Te cage Mae Pa ate SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS. Wehs ee xte DET, poeeelSong “EVERY MAN IS A VALUABLE MEMBER OF SOCIETY WHO BY HIS OBSERVATIONS, RESEARCHES, AND EXPERIMENTS PROCURES KNOWLEDGE FOR MEN.’’—SMITHSON. WASHINGTON: CLT Y : PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION. 1901. ~~ Sane tu, thy oe _ eer ee a ee ADVERTISEMENT. . The present series, entitled ‘‘ Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collec- tions,” is intended to embrace all the publications issued directly by the Smithsonian Institution in octavo form; those in quarto constitut- ing the ‘‘ Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge.” The quarto series includes memoirs, embracing the records of extended original investigations and researches, resulting in what are believed to be new truths, and constituting positive additions to the sum of human knowl- edge. The octavo series is designed to contain reports on the present state of our knowledge of particular branches of science; instructions for collecting and digesting facts and materials for research; lists and synopses of species of the organic and inorganic world; museum cata- logues; reports of explorations; aids to bibliographical investigations, ete., generally prepared at the express request of the Institution, and at its expense. In the Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, as well as in the present series, each article is separately paged and indexed, and the actual date of its publication is that given on its special title-page, and not that of the volume in which it is placed. In many cases works have been published and largely distributed, years before their com- bination into volumes. : DNL EY, ' Secretary S. 1. II! gigs nen ¥ <4 a a ; a 7 oa ; ( ms a “ iv ge Vy 4 a = yi * Fi Tau ie = << wy a a vi : ys i. « £* VS Coie w * ‘ am “ o _ + ~~ r " oF dale -* r : , o -_ i _ -_ fi ee a SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION DOCUMENTS RELATIVE TO ITS ORIGIN AND HISTORY. Mik Die Ooo COMPILED AND EDITED BY IW PAL JOQinjS bbe sS- EM EAV GO; VOLUMES. Vol. LI—1887-1899. FIFTIETH CONGRESS TO FIFTY-FIFTH CONGRESS WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. j L9OL. ieee CONTENTS OF VOLUMES I AND II. VOLUME I. Page an MP rRPET UEC ots aS oe Se SA SA ag noha ian cictin cee melind aeee II RenrnMeeenesR rayne. Sie a Pe SO ge es oes See supa Aoewie cee III Sons no pile Ulin Ie Se fone Sica eR ib lied eae ie Blin a pe ei Rm nde SE V OS eee Et glee IP IEP CAE pe A Do a VII Act of organization of the Institution and amendments, ete. to March 3, 1899.. xxr Acts and joint resolutions of Congress referred to in this work .-........-..-- XXVII PART I. Will of James Smithson /made October 23, 1826; proved June 27, 1829) ....-. 5 Correspondence between attorneys in England, the Department of State, Richard Rush, etc., relative to the bequest of Smithson (July 21, 1835- ME Perea ees ote Sa Pe ey eet Nd es bony lt a ee 7-111 The case of the United States Government against the English Government in pie court of chancery to obtain the bequest..-.:.....2-..2222-22-22.---2-0% 13 Bpmennoe ane Tnlist: Counsel .\y 2.5 U4 lee ese te te 14 Decree in chancery awarding Smithson’s bequest to the United States, May eRe ee ron tenee hy PRL. wt WML hei cay ey eM 56 eParE CIRCCIMED Ce LIVE: O°NNG tan ee Se ke ee 70 Peeenny OF expences OF Richard. Rush)... 2252 oo te ee 98 Penemue OF tie personal effects of Smithson: 5.2202... s eee oe seen 98 Smithson bequest paid into the Treasury of the United States ............_-- 109 Residuary bequest of Smithson (May 16, 1861-February 22, 1867) .........-- 112 Increase of the Smithson fund: Perincn fund: (Pebtuary 24,°1874)) 2st ooo ke eS 120 Pereees me EUINIEe ERECHY LD PGGO)\ 2 0 oi Eee oo 120 Hodgkins fund (October 22, 1891-May 19, 1894).................--2---- 120 Other bequests and gifts to the Institution: umeernMtaE EG) MLSE ar Nsom 9s aac as I ee ek eee et 121 BEEN MESO 32 ooo cet Sen, ee hae) i et Ae ee 121 oe | ETT (GM 21) ee 2 aes Ry nee Cee o> SENOS 9 SNe TEA © ae 121 PART II. Legislation relative to the establishment of the Smithsonian Institution, 1835- ee Re Nl So PE fe aoe ne ee Soca Oe Ce 123 Twenty-fourth Congress, 1835-1837: Message of President Jackson, December 17, 1835_...........--.--..---- 125 Report of Senate Committee on the Judiciary (Leigh) ................-- 135 Heport.of House select committee (Adams) ..:.................---...-- 150 Dena on acceptance. obtihe bequest’... 4.25. .5221-/.4.2.222.-225-.20-- 136 Act to authorize and enable the President to prosecute the claim for the yout 7 ee 1 re gh a RS Ti 0 ee re Tn on 142 Iv CONTENTS. Twenty-fifth Congress, 1837-1839: Page. Bequest considered ....-._ 222 tenes eee... .....-. enn 143 Message of President Van Buren, December 6, 1838_.....--------------- 145 Memorial of Prof. Walter BR.) Johbnsonpeaesre 45. ¢.-...-......-.4.—e 146 Memorial of Charles Lewis Fleischmann -_ =. 2:____..........-------22088 155 Speeches on application of the bequest...................-.---------- 163, 173 Bill for disposition of the bequest (Robbins)_...--._.....-..-------+-228 ilerale Debate on establishment of the Smithsonian Institution .....------.----- 173 Twenty-sixth Congress, 1839-1841: Bill offered for disposition of the bequest (Adams).............--------- 184 Estimates of cost of an astronomical observatory...........-.----------- 206 Statement of investment of Smithson bequest in State stocks .......----- 215 Bill for disposition of the bequest (Linn); -seeweeee ee. ae 215 Incorporationionthe Nahonal institaiions seer ee ae 217 Bill to esfiblish the Smithsonian Institution (Preston) -........---.---- 219 Care or Goverment collechons s..o. 2.2.55 Sas eee me es en ou See 219 Intem~atonaexchanves' 22 2.52 2. < foo ee ee A oe eres 220 Twenty-seventh Congress, 1841-1843: Repeal of.act to invest Smithson fund in State stocks --......-.---.------ 220 Message of President Tyler, December 7, 1841 ...-...-..--.--.--2+-+--<- 225 Report of House select committee (Adams) -..-.-..2.-.2--..--.-4--2064 226 Copies of State bonds procured from Smithson fund ......-.-....------- 229 Statement of stocks in which the fund was invested ...........---------- 235 Bill to establish the Smithsonian Institution (Adams) -----------.------ 235 United ‘States exploring expedition... .:- 22... 2223-5225... eee 239 Twenty-eighth Congress, 1843-1845: Message. of President Tyler, December 5,°1843........---.--. 22g 0sseeee 241 Condition.of the Smithson fund; January, 1844-_- 2... aoe eee 243 Bonds and stocks purchased from Smithsonian Institution .......--.---- 245 Imberest onl stocks’. -0': 22 Sone CS cee Cee ee See eee hel 246 Correspondence relative to purchase of stocks ........--.-.-----------<- 250 Biull tovestablish the Institution: ((Vappan.))Se2e22— 2-22.22 eo 266 Report from House select committee (Adams) ..-.-..--.---------------- 268 Bill toestablish+the instubuwon. (Adams) 222. soe) ee ee ese aoe ae eee 273 Hill to establish the Institution (Tappan) 22.2.2 ->..- 222-52. 5.5. eee 276 Debate on bills to establish the Institution -..........-.------.--------- 280 Exploring expeditionae hse. te. sae n= ee = oe eee ar ee 320 Twenty-ninth Congress, 1845-1847: Bill to establish the Institution (Owen))2---2--- === os eee eee 321 Debate in House on establishment of Institution.-.....-.-...----------- 333 Bill to.establish the Institution (Morse) 222525042 355222 eee. eee 388 Bill to‘establish the Institutiom (Hough))) passed 225222) 52 ae 423 Act to establish the Institution, approved August 10, 1846.....-.-...---- 429 International exchanges. <2. .s2 bl Stas sees eee ee eee 454 Exploring expedition. .2.2 5222.2 .i bose age e eee ee ee 435 Catlin Indiam. gallery... 4e5-062 2b 2 a LE ee eh ee 435 Anpointment, of Repents .2.~ 22 22) sc aacase sees > pe esses 2 ee 436 Purchase of city hall for Smithsonian Institution (proposed) .......----- 438 Reportiof the Smithsonian Institation |... 22.2222 -5<-her cheese eee 439 PART TEE Legislation relative to the Institution and its depenaencies, 1847-1899. ....... 441 Thirtieth Congress, 1847-1849: Committee on the Smithsonian Institution. ......2.22.2.22...--2oeeeeeee 443 ae CONTENTS. Vv - Thirtieth Congress, 1847-1849—Continued. Page. eIOmMmneY Ol tepemtes |: = 5.205 - =~ aanqanes-cccens lan ccaieccceeee ss ce 463 Pepor: or cue eaithsonian Institution --.-1.-...-.--..--2-- 2 cn. wens se- 464 RnenminenmiO ACL Ol OFPANIZAtION... 2. 22 co5 5 ssecc ence ewe ewe a eween--- 466 Pane cea ee ORCUANEOS) 5. 266.2 62a ode ance cease co usencwisc coe eens 466 ane RUT al eo oe wan 2 eye ee wo tle oS sine oataie cl © 467 Thirty-first Congress, 1849-1851: eee re ED ROUTE pe Sel eo Be = Re eis w= io aac 468 amen covermuient, collections /../2.- 2. 52-2. .-agde--- snc 25h Ue See eee 970 imternationaliexchanges - 22 a joes Sess See 6 ee a te aan 974, 1840 estimates... i s.o2 22 See ee ee ee Soe 978 appropriations: = S22. eo see ieee 979 Smithsonian building, estimates- "=... eee tee eee eee SaaS 980 APPTOPTIAMONS |. 2 ye ees ae Ley oe 981 Bureau of Ethnology, estimates:...2-. 55-2. se set ous eee ence ae 981 aAppropniations:< 252. cape ees. 981 Ibtireaw of (meres 2s 2 oe cee ee ee Re eee tee Oe cote, ial 981 Nelson's report on Alaskan. 2 0522552. 3 bo ee eee sot ee 982 ‘urner'd report on Alaska <2 soo. 222k oe eee os ee 983 Report of the Smithsonian Institution _.=--_.--- 5222.-22---4-<-4--~-e0ee 986 Capron Japaneseiepllection: 222255025525 Vl ee ee en Soe 988 Hibnology, ull@hime Sono oS so cece eos Oo ec aoe ae ne ee ee 1002 Great NOU GH en, Seton ee aes see ety ae ae Sema eel ee ee 1009 National Museum, Government collections. ..-.....-.........--..-----. 1011 Binds y Opetine: Too. th ee oo en eee 1014 section of transportation <5 22202222... see. See 1014 estimates: i250) 524575 oe eee een eee eee 1018 appropriations 22 222.25' +4 sel eee 1022 Manusorints: commission <1 2.50.22. Se ee 1032 Expositions, Centennial celebration of the Constitution --_.....-.------- 1033 Minneapolis 2.2 2..2i<-< .2cc2h = SULERESE Ee ee 103' Rock (Creek Parkes tes 221 22h s2522 ssc eee eee tee ae eee eee 1040 Neumann’s suk flag... o.cos Jo cs¢cices cesses tee bets Lee eee 1041 SBoulthsoniam fone, oe sess ose theccad beoted sete cee ee 1042 Public printing and bindings... ...2..0..22b2ul2 9: 2 eee eae 1042 Smithsonian erounds).226..2255. 22/0 See 2. eee ee 1043 School of Research and Medicine. ... 2c s2selU. Lo .e. Ce 1043 Anny Medical, Museum.and. Libtary- 2: 22..2.22- /tutsie se eee 1043 RemVeAWOPRG. noi Ceseds eo mcee cs ccbeeeeepreres-s 225 5seeeee eee 1044 VOLUME II. Fiftieth Congress, 1887-1889: Bureau of Ethnology, estimates... a [oo ue oe eh ns 2 1045 BpPrOpriaWoOns.—.- 4a ose en sesh sees 1045 Spencer BF: Baird, services Of 2:5. 52 Siiteen eee. 4-5-2 2lo ee 1045 Static Olt 2 I. Sekt See eee a: a. eee Bea Lil)! Bureau. of FmMecArts See oS. eee ere ne ee eee 1105 G. Brown’ Goode; Fish\Commissioner: —32 52 eens +2 oe oes. eee 1106 Rock Creek Nattonal Park's 2228 0S. oe eee ee ee eee bs: oe 1106 Appointment’ ol RevenitssS2— ees ett ttt es eee 2 OF Capron Japanese collection= 5.222.222.2227 i: * Soo ee oe ee 1110 Army Medical Museum and’ Library: +:2:22-222 212222220. 3-2 ee 1112 Senon: Bache '& Go 2222252 tSstc boss ee See Se ee 1112 Expositions, Washington 2.2.0. Cece ieee ee 1113 Melbourne !: i. 222.2. shite Se ee ee 1118 Barcelona <2 2.22/18 PSS Be ee ee 1114 Paris o2.3..04.dcuck. Sock ee eec elec eee ee eee eee eee ee 1114 Brussels . 20222. Lecce Meee aie aie Se ee oe 1119 Gincinmattia. = <2 /.s,2 Ee ge eee 1119 Marietta... -- a ancle sh ein ea ee ae 1122 x £ rT CONTENTS. Fiftieth Congress, 1887-1889—Continued. mau ep MENG ie ee nee. atiekeetesetesbet i022 ssctele isl seks. {WEF} ON MS SIS ae 2 OV aS or ee nee ne a (SER CIOS TS EL HS) ot [Cae a a ee epore or amithsonian Institution ....\.......2-...2 vs 2202 eee. eee MMMM NUR HM TCOMITMMACTON oc oles fees eee e PA Le le JL el ole P nn UAT SSNs Eos SEE ay ence ae 2 Oe) eae RE Oy MRC i Sa Privilege of floor of the House of Representatives......-..-....-.-.-.--.- eee mnineiath PAIN eGo cL sel os. snuck la bcte dees ewe ee coe Senos ab Goverment WON. ..<.2222.2.- 222 bee teed le ose aed eds Pron nanert. Wale Owen t > .00dvel 25 eof Use te linthereraegai@naenil’ hel abn olste\y ce anys get a nee ee ee Ac te RR Sm Ree Rie CSUN gies ne ekepea tans ater a a Oe ...2.2. 5.4 4a es ee ee 1584, 1840 Philadelphia Centennial: -2iu-ceelyeel eae ee oe eee ene 1595 Use of Government collections in Washington by studenis, ete ---------- 1595 Tnshot employees. 2.2... . 560... ea eee eee ee eee eee eee 1596 Astrophysical! Observatory 4-eeeeeee ese ee ee eee eee 1597 CONTENTS. XIll Fifty-second Congress, 1891—1893—Continued. Page. List of employees, International exchanges .........-.....-.-.--------- 1597 f National Aoolopical Wark oo. 2.02... scent loos eee ee 1597 yi PaO UE NETSEUT | eM et aaa in 2a oo Debs eae 1598 | Meuehters’of the American Revolution....-:2.-.--.-.-.-.-...-....----- 1600 Select committee on the Smithsonian Institution......-.-...-.---------- 1600 Perens collection of copper implements .- -. 2... sess 225.2 22 adage lle. 1600 Sep prorciinone d@incussed 2G l2bF so1s. 22s i eaee! F228 ee GSU 1601 National Society of Colonial Dames of America......-...-.-.---...----- 1623 i Amencany Enstoricall Associations Report... ....-.. Suse obs se. teak 1624 mepon of aintheonian- Institution ..2.....-.2.2.222225.2.. 2.02 ee 1625 ema nun atic, Ramin on. Ss te ee ssl ok 1628 MVetiiy Ch gue UmMibed sigtes: 22262 2.7L Peete cS su leek sass. ee elk 1629 Monae IstOnenl Saclkeby. --- 4--- = tee ee se eee ee cose eens aie 1632 Public buildings. .......--- Peer a ee aS Baa eae hres ato eC 1632 LS Fifty-third Congress, 1893-1895: Pemrrmminielinth Mesemia 6 40. .0 Slee ecb ke eo etal aan 1632 PreneCcHaiIen OhUOCUIMENIS 22 th2on. 20 lonsn seas ttiads cUaee see nace 1635 emRreaGnin- alr ni ranCIsCO. CL ~ SYS LL eee ot ose Sasha ces cee voles o UNS. 1635 UT EEE 0 Ne ep eset A th Pat ee Puen) hg a a 1636 LMA MUSG TENG One ch take aR net ren Aes ol ate a TH OE Ah ea 1639 MSY ee Se i SP ae aleve he Bei ec ihe e GAN penn iia pee Rae 1639 ENG AIRTO DED Ste Pelee hee REN Seah i ha pe eR ee 1640 oem ee eee ee nt tie ess erence onge tee oak, Sy 2 eae 1643 Teton Peay aE Mee Bek Ak “AEN Oy an Acted oa Sed gig nc Bi a eat anil oi 1 1643 IBANCClONA eee neta Aaa tee etree eee Senate a= tie eee a es 1644 LCL ENG IROTE gi) 019) 5 REID, OS a ee te ee a > eae Ree 1644 Pemiversiny or une United States... 223-2 be eseo4 ede enone oes 1654 enema Ia hOrienl NOGIELY EMR Eel lel fo ees Soe e ede Se 1661 Pemos| Museum, armory building 02-2. .2 30.2. eek sete eens ccsle 1661 new building.......-.- Zar seaport cath 2 ka ple bio eee 1661 Sunday and evening opening..........2....2..2..2-- 1662 COS UHINTET TSS Fak 8 Dhue las aie Pica re EEL Nea ee esa 1662 SURO SPR niaeie ese ee kek ah eee ce eae eee 1668 Documents for the Smithsonian Institution...........--.-----+----L---- 1670 SMmion Er Suppilce sine. ea nase anos as et Gat ha ee apne are ee ata 1670 Report of SMmibisomian Institution: .s252 S224 05 20d Soto se bee eee 1672 fmeport on expenditures... -2-.. ss. ) 1692 aApPropriakwoneze sass wee SL | 5 ee 1694 Act for public printing and binding and distribution of public documents. 1695 Appropriations debated. 2c. . 4: _s26 gab eee Pate eee ee oat eee 1697 Weighing coal and measuring wood for public service. __.......---.----- 1698 Arrears of (busimessan publiciotiicess sa. ees ea ee eee 2 ee 1699 Bonds of «disbursing. officers. 225222 su-.cte eee eed eee 1700 Fifty-fourth Congress, 1895-1897: at International-exchanges; estimates... uso soe ee ead see 2) + ic ae Se 1700 APPLOpriahions.- fea te eee eh eee ee er 1766 Smithsonian bureaus under civil service .........-.-.------------------ 1767 International catalogue of scientific literature .......--.---.------------ 1769 Covernment of Library of Conpress-< 222: 2220. seer eae ee 1773 Fifty-fifth Congress, 1897-1899: Appoimtment of Reventss2 2.2.5 Soo. 2 fas cece oe oe eee ee ee 1775 Settlement between the United States and State of Arkansas -...-....--- 177 ASiropmysical Observatory, annals: Joos oe cca ete ee 1787 estimates | ....24,22 an). 22 eee Ser ee ae appropriations! +42. 22 ore tee e ee ee 1788 CONTENTS. XV Fifty-afth Congress, 1897-1899—Continued. Page. a AUER) 012) °C |e i ns > nS ce eee sae 1789, 1841 ‘ 129 TE tela, Se pale da iS ais A LA ea lg a 1792 Pi [Eels Ei LUE TT a need a he UR Bt ae er Oe eae 1795 if Gavusa tmand. or PtiialG. 3 22 7sai2 she 4s ok dee ee ew om 1796 & OI eats ont ia, cae SEE ioe oe eat 1801 bf ree ek ee ees ly ag ela: 1841 ' Prisvelomey mm port esos... el ed 1842, 1844 : RAE rca Spe Se ee ee, eer eee eee © 1805 International catalogue of scientific literature...-..............--.------ 1806 : Rock Creek Park-.-.--- ah is So id ic we, oh acters Draka Boyd 2 1807 ‘ PuermanOnl) CxXCHANGeS, CSIMAles:...-. 2.5. 2255 -..-50 27 ee scene cee 1809 § MOP EA EIINS ly oe ei, ae ae 1810 Bureau of American’ Ethnology, estimates ..........--..--2.-.-2.--..-- 1812 ; apUMUPpieMONNs soo sole lo oe 1813 : MEAD ERIE, OPCW LIE CH 952.) Se ich thee oo Sim hn EG he es ie 1813 Bawounl Museum, Sunday opening... 222. o.65-—on04 sae nn cee en eee 1814 : printing bulletins and proceedings. -................- 1814 SSS VENEDUOHY Mee Nae ei ae patna ETT Ue Mia 1814 ENTE C) CUE 51707 01 Rae yee Nad Nn SR a oo a 1820 Bomerny Gr the Winited piates 22.55.5526) esse oles VAL kee 1823 Leaves of absence to public employees-_-.............-.---------------- 1825 Spe eeeemrrrOr re ONCCHOM <2. 2 3255525000225 ok a eel e eee en eta e ees ck 1826 Preservation of game in the District of Columbia -.---..-----.-.2-..--..-- 1826 Purchase of books to be specifically provided for --............-..----.- 1829 Quarterly reports on condition of business ..............---.-...-.----- 1829 Natwonal Zoolosical Park, exchange of lands..........--..:..----------- 1829 Studiovtox Brbistsias 22s 440 no)” e Bae eee 1831 readjustment of boundaries. ...............--- 1832 PEASE ADIDAS 12) a EN leptin ia era ER eRe 1834 PTE 11 eo cnc he- es So eee 1852 Governors of the District of Columbia) 22> 220225 oe ac. Ss. 2 See 1852 Senators | 2252.08 Le ee ee eee ee on 1852 Representatives ..< .-. . s22 22.0220 See pe eee 2 eee 1853 Citizens from: States .... 0. 22. ee ee eee eee tee - =~. cee 1853 Citizens ‘from “Washington ‘City-"- cee eee eee eee lee ee 1854 List of Regents aecording to residence .*~ 22225 Sous 2-2 S222. --. - ee 1854 Tast of officers of tie Tnstitditon 2c. 52 ee ee 1856 CoRRIGENDAL S222 eee. obese ne cee a cose ee eee eee eee 1857 ET aE Oe ae! ee hee eee FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1045 FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. BUREAU OF ETHNOLOGY—ESTIMATES. December 5, 1887—House. Estimates for 1889. For the purpose of continuing ethnological researches among the American Indians, under the direction of the Secretary of the Smith- sonian Institution, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $50,000. December 3, 1888—House. Estimates for 1890. For the purpose of continuing ethnological researches among the American Indians, under the direction of the Smithsonian Institution, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $50,000. BUREAU OF ETHNOLOGY—APPROPRIATIONS. March 30, 1888. Deficiency act for 1888. For North American ethnology, Smithsonian Institution, $49.09. (Stat., XXV, 63.) [To cover claim reported in House Executive Document No. 90, Fiftieth Congress; first session. ] October 2, 1888. Sundry civil act for 1889. For the purpose of continuing ethnological researches among the American Indians, under the direction of the Secretary of the Smith- sonian Institution, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $40,000. (Stat., XXV, 529.) March 2, 1889. Sundry civil act for 1890. For the purpose of continuing ethnological researches among the American Indians, under the direction of the Secretary of the Smith- sonian Institution, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $40,000. (Stat., XXV, 952.) SERVICES OF SPENCER F. BAIRD. December 12, 1887—Senate. Mr. Grorce F. Epmunps introduced a bill (S. 533) to pay Mrs. Mary C. Baird, widow of the late Spencer F. Baird, the sum of 50,000, in full compensation for the services and expenses of the said 1046 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Spencer F. Baird during his administration of the office of Commis- sioner of Fish and Fisheries, from February 25, 1871, to the time of his death, in August, 1887. Mr. Epmunps. This is not a claimant’s bill, but is a bill to provide for paying the widow of the late Professor Baird for about sixteen years of gratuitous service that he performed as Commissioner of Fish and Fisheries. I move that the bill be referred to the Commit- tee on Appropriations, who have been familiar with the subject and made appropriations for it, and I hope that they will report upon it very early, indeed, as I believe it myself to be a very meritorious and just bill. Referred to Committee on Appropriations. January 12, 1888.—House. The first bill on the Calendar was read, as follows: A bill! (S. 261) to amend the law concerning the Commissioner of Fish and Fisheries. Be it enacted, etc., That section 4395 of the Revised Statutes ce the United States be, and the same is ee amended to read as follows: ‘‘That there shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and con- sent of the Senate, a person of scientific and practical acquaintance with the fish and fisheries to be a Commissioner of Fish and Fisheries, and he shall receive a salary of $5,000 a year, and he shall be removable at the pleasure of the President. Said Commissioner shall not hold any other office or employment under the authority of the United States or any State.”’ The report (by Mr. PoiInpExTER Dunn) was read, as follows: The Committee on the Merchant Marine and Fisheries, to whom was referred the bill (S. 261) entitled ‘‘An act to amend the law concerning the Commissioner of Fish and Fisheries,’’ have considered the same, and report it back to the House without amendment and recommend its passage without delay. The United States Fish Commission was established by act of February 9, 1871, which provided for the appointment by the President, with the consent of the Sen- ate, of a Commissioner of Fish and Fisheries from among the civil officers or employees of the Government, who shall serve without additional salary. The act contemplated simply an investigation, ‘‘ with the view of ascertaining whether any, and what, diminution in the number of food-fishes’’ had taken place, and also what ‘* protective, prohibitory, or precautionary measures should be adopted, and report upon the same to Congress.”’ The act of March 3 of the same year to provide for deficiencies, etc., appropriated $5,000 for the expenses of the inquiry ordered. Prof. Spencer F. Baird, then assistant secretary of the Smithsonian Institution and an employee of the Government, he having charge of the National Museum, was appointed Commissioner. He prosecuted the inquiries with so much zeal, energy, and ability that the act of 1871 was reenacted, and the deficiency bill of May 18, 1872, made an additional appropriation of $3,500 to continue the inquiry and $500 for the preparation of illustrations, tables, and report. So impressed was Congress with the wisdom of Professor Baird’s recommenda- tions, based on the investigations he had made into the condition of our fisheries, that the act of June 10, 1872, contained an appropriation of $5,000 to continue those 1The bill (S. 261) passed Senate on December 21, 1887. FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1047 investigations auring the fiscal year, and $15,000 was provided ‘‘ for the introduction of shad into the waters of the Pacific States, the Gulf States, and of the Mississippi Valley; and of salmon, whitefish, and other useful food fishes into the waters of the United States to which they are best adapted.’’ Each succeeding year appropria- tions have been increased as the work was extended under the wise and successful management of the Commissioner. The act limiting the appointment of the Commissioner to the detail of some one at the time in the employ of the Government appears to have contemplated only an inquiry occupying perhaps a few summer months. At the time of the selection of Professor Baird his duties under his salaried posi- tion were comparatively light, as he was charged with the administration, under the Secretary, of the Museum, which was in those days contained in the small space which could be allowed in the Smithsonian building. Under Professor Baird’s masterly, wise, and energetic management both the Fish Commission and the National Museum have grown to large proportions, so that at his death the work of the Fish Commission had developed from an inquiry in 1871, on an appropriation of $5,000, to the production, transportation, and distribution of over 100,000,000 young fish and the administration of some 16 hatching and rearing stations—2 in Maine, at Grand Lake Stream and Bucksport; 2 in Massachusetts, at Gloucester and Woods Hole; 2 in Michigan, at Northville and Alpena; 1 at Duluth; 1 on the Columbia River; 2 in California, on the Sacramento; 1 on the Susquehanna, at Havre de Grace; 1 at the mouth of the Potomac; 2 within the city of Washington; 1 at Fort Washington, and 1 at Wytheville, Va.—besides the administration of scientific investigations and fish hatching done by three steam and one sailing vessel and of three transporting cars specially designed to transfer fish from one end of the coun- try to the other. The National Museum has had a corresponding expansion, for in addition to the hall of the Smithsonian, which held the collections in 1871, and whose administra- tion cost $20,000, a building covering 33 acres has been built and equipped, and it has been found necessary to appropriate $168,000 for their care this year. The necessity arose for husbanding and increasing our food resources, and Pro- fessor Baird created and expanded the Fish Commission, and although the act of 1871 may have been prudent and a wise measure at the time it was enacted, and although the work of the Fish Commission as well as that of the Museum was well done by him, perhaps at sacrifice of some years of his valuable and honored life, it is to be doubted if, at the time of his appointment as Fish Commissioner, the Smith- sonian, the National Museum, and the Fish Commission had been of their present magnitude, Congress would have provided for their conduct being placed even on his broad shoulders and the work of three assigned to his well-trained and culti- vated intellect. The work of the Fish Commission has become so extensive and the results so important to the country that it should be made, as this bill proposes, the sole object of the Commissioner. It should occupy all his time. This bill, therefore, while giving the President the greatest latitude in making his choice, takes away the limitation that that choice shall be confined to those who may be otherwise employed by the Government. This bill repeals the provision of the act of 1871 which requires that the now important and all-engrossing duties of the Fish Com- missioner shall be performed at the expense of some other department and some other appropriation. Under the present law the Commissioner must either hold a sinecure, receive a Government salary which he does not earn, or he must neglect duties for which he is paid in order that he might perform others for which he is not paid, or perhaps, as in the case of Professor Baird, devote hours which nature demands for rest and recreation to Government work without compensation. The first two alternatives 1048 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. are neither right nor proper, and the Government is not so impecunious or needy that we should ask for it or accept such gratuitous services. The rate of salary named in the bill is the same as has been fixed for and paid to the assistant commissioner for years. With a Commissioner charged, as his sole duty, with the work of the Fish Com- mission there will be no further need for an assistant commissioner. The bill, therefore, does not contemplate any additional expense. The further details of the administration will be looked to when the appropriation bills are made up. It is best not to encumber the present bill with other matter than the provision for the head of the Commission, as it is of the first importance that a permanent head of the Commission should be provided for at once. As soon as the new Com- missioner provided for by this act shall have been appointed and installed he can be called before the committees of the House, and if further legislation be needed it can be predicated on his reports and after a revision of any projects for the prosecution of the work which he may submit. Mr. PornpExtTER Dunn. I do not know of anything that I can add to the explanation given in the report if members have attended to the reading of it. The simple question is whether the Fish Commis- sion shall be retained and given a thorough business organization, with a distinctive, independent, and responsible head to it, or whether it shall be abandoned. I presume that members generally know that it originated at the instance of Professor Baird in the institution of a mere inquiry in 1871, and that it has grown now to be one of the most important bureaus of the Government in the estimation of a great many thoughtful and considerate people. Appropriations have been made from year to year and placed at the disposal, practically, of Professor Baird almost without limitation, and I believe during most of the time without detailed report as to the manner of their expenditure, so great was the confidence which Congress and the country had in his wisdom and in his integrity, and the results have justified that confidence. But Professor Baird is dead, and there is now no practical head to that bureau. And it is thought wise and to be best that an inde- pendent head be created, in order that the bureau may be administered on a basis of responsibilty, as the other departments or bureaus of the Government are and should be. Mr. W. C. Oates. Will the gentleman from Arkansas permit me a question ? Mr. Dunn. Yes, sir. Mr. Oates. Will the gentleman inform us what authority Con- gress has for legislation creating this bureau? Mr. Dunn. Well, Mr. Chairman, that is a very large question, undoubtedly, in the estimation of my friend from Alabama; but it seems that Congress created this bureau in 1871 and has maintained it since. It was perhaps unfortunate that my friend from Alabama was not here just then to intercept it; but we have the bureau in OE a FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1049 existence, and it is for Congress to determine now not whether it will create such a bureau, but whether or not it will retain it. Really, time would fail me to undertake to go into a general disquisition as to the exact authority of Congress to do or not to doa great many things which it has done in the past. Mr. Oates. Will the gentleman answer another question ? Mr. Dunn. If I can. Mr. Oates. Was not the origin of this bureau merely a resolution authorizing the detail of an officer of the Government to inquire into the destruction of fish along the coast? Mr. Dunn. Yes, sir; that was its origin, as is stated in the report of the committee. Inquiry made under that authority led to the making of the appropriations by Congress from time to time for the creation of hatching stations, for the construction and equipment of vessels, for the construction and maintenance of railway cars to trans- port spawn and young fish, and distribute them over the country, and for doing all the things that the Fish Commission has done. There has been created and brought into existence a plant costing the Goy- ernment perhaps more than a quarter million dollars, possibly a half million. We now have sixteen hatching stations, several vessels with their equipments, and some railway cars constructed for the express purpose of transporting spawn and young fish to different parts of the country, where they are deposited in the water for development and propagation. That is the situation. The bureau is now actually in existence. Heretofore the appropriations have been intrusted to Pro- fessor Baird, but, unfortunately for science and the good of mankind, Professor Baird is no longer alive, and it now devolves upon the Goy- ernment to put that bureau upon a business basis or else to abandon it. It is not believed that there is any strong sentiment in the country in favor of abandoning it, because everybody is aware of the great bene- fits that have resulted from its establishment. Mr. G. W. Sreevx. Can the gentleman inform us whether Profes- sor Baird’s successor has been appointed ? Mr. Dunn. There has been designated an officer to take charge of that bureau temporarily, Professor Goode, who is now away on leave of absence, I believe. By reference of the question to the Solicitor- General, it was found that the assistant commissioner, who had been really the administrative officer of the Government, was not eligible for appointment to the position of Commissioner. Mr. Sreete. Is Professor Baird’s successor at the head of the Smithsonian Institution ? Mr. Dunn. Professor Goode? Mr. Sreee. Yes. Mr. Dunn. I can not answer that question. Professor Baird, I believe, was one of the secretaries of the Institution. 1050 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Mr. 8. S. Cox. Professor Goode is assistant secretary of the Smith- sonian Institution, but he will probably be compelled to resign by reason of ill health. Mr. STEELE. Professor Baird’s successor, if appointed, will receive $8,000. Mr. Dunn. Oh, no. Mr. Streets. Professor Baird received that. Mr. Dunn. Professor Baird received nothing as Fish Commissioner. Mr. STEELE. But in connection with the Smithsonian Institution he received $8,000. Mr. Dunn. He received $8,000 for performing the duties of that office and of two others. Mr. Cox. But not from the Government. Mr. Dunn. Not from the Government. Mr. STEELE. I want to ask the gentleman from Arkansas whether, within his knowledge, the President of the United States has canvassed the country to find a man who can perform the duties which Professor Baird performed as secretary of the Smithsonian Institution and as Fish Commissioner. Mr. Dunn. I must respectfully refer the gentleman to the President himself. The question would not be a respectful one for me to ask, and I must decline to make the inquiry; and, in the absence of any information on the subject, I can not undertake to answer the gentle- man’s question. Mr. SteeLtx. Do you not think it would be possible for the Presi- dent to find a suitable successor to Professor Baird? Mr. Dunn. I have never doubted the President’s ability to discharge all the duties devolving upon him by law as Chief Executive with great ability and great benefit to the country. Mr. Streets. As I understand it now, the party of ‘‘economy and reform” propose to pay $13,000 to some one for performing the same duties that were performed by Professor Baird for $8,000. Mr. Dunn. The gentleman is greatly in error. I sympathize with him, and I shall be patient in enlightening him. The Government has never paid one dollar as a salary to any person for acting as Fish Commissioner. Mr. Steeve. Professor Baird did that work in addition to his other duties? Mr. Dunn. Yes; Professor Baird was a great naturalist and scient- ist and an enthusiast about this particular matter. He rendered the Government a very valuable service as a labor of love, and his labors produced such valuable results that it is now deemed wise for Con- gress to preserve and extend them by preserving this bureau and leaving the President to find a fit successor to carry on Professor Baird’s work. FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1051 Mr. Sreetr. Would it not be economy to defer this matter for a while in order to see whether a successor can not be found to per- form the same duty that Professor Baird did and for the same pay ? Mr. Dunn. The President will scarcely ‘‘search” for a Commis- sioner, for he is authorized to appoint one. Mr. Sreee. He has already made a designation, as I understand. Mr. Wu. L. Wiuson, of West Virginia. The gentleman from Arkansas [Mr. Dunn] yields to me for a few moments. As to the question of the gentleman from Indiana [Mr. Steele], I will simply make this explanation, that the salary of Professor Baird was never paid out of the Treasury or by the Government of the United States. As Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, elected by the Regents of that Institution, not appointed by the President, he was paid out of the income of the Institution. He was designated as the head of the Fish Commission, and for his services in that capacity he received no salary whatever. Professor Baird’s successor as Secretary of the Smithsonian Institu- tion has been selected by the Regents, and is performing his duties. This Fish Commission has grown to such an extent that the adminis- trative work requires an executive officer at the head of it. It will be no longer proper to devolve the duties of the head of this Commission upon an officer paid out of a private fund, and who, having been selected for his high scientific abilities and attainments, can not prop- erly be required to give to the administrative duties of an office like this the time and attention which they demand, and who is not expected to have the special qualifications which would fit him for work’of this character. While on the floor I will say only one other word with reference to the appointment of a head for this Commission. By the language of the bill it is provided, I observe, that the President shall appoint as Commissioner of Fish and Fisheries a person of scientific and practical acquaintance with the fish and fisheries of the coast. The gentleman from Arkansas [Mr. Dunn] informs me that this language has been modified so as to include the inland waters of the country. With the respect which I have for Professor Baird’s memory and which I had for him while he was living, I would be the last man to make any crit- icism upon the past management of the Fish Commission; but I think there is danger that the scientific side of this question may be given a prominence not designed by Congress in the establishment of this Com- mission. I do not understand that the appropriations made by Con- gress for this work, amounting to several hundred thousand dollars per annum, and increasing from year to year, are given for the purpose of investigations in natural history. In my view, the work of this Commission is designed to be economic and practical, looking to an increase of the food supply in the fisheries of the United States. The 1052 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. practical and economic side of the work of this Commission is the one which should have prominence, and the scientific work should be only an adjunct. I think the danger to be apprehended in the future, especially if we should have a purely scientific man at the head of this Commission, is that he will consider the appropriations given by Con- gress as designed rather for the purpose of conducting scientific experi- ments and investigations than to be applied to the actual economic work contemplated by Congress in the creation of the Commission. Mr. A. J. Hopxins, of Illinois. Does not the gentleman’s argument apply more to the question of the appointment which may be made by the President than to the phraseology of the bill? Mr. Wison, of West Virginia. I am not objecting to the phra- seology of the bill, for it includes both terms—‘‘ scientific” and ‘‘ prac- tical.” Mr. Hopkins, of Illinois. Of course the appointee must have some special knowledge with reference to the subjects intrusted to the Com- mission. Mr. Wuson, of West Virginia. If I were going to write the bill I would give the word ‘‘ practical” preference over the other. Mr. Dunn. I yield to my colleague on the committee, the gentle- man from California [Mr. Felton]. Mr. Cuarues N. FEtton. I wish to state for the information of gen- tlemen here that while Professor Baird received no salary other than that paid from the funds of the Smithsonian Institution Mr. STEELE. A salary of $8,000. Mr. #revron. He had an assistant who performed, under the super- vision of the professor, most of the duties connected with the work of the Fish Commission, and this assistant was paid for his services $5,000 per annum. It is now proposed to dispense with this assistant and to put at the head of this Commission some competent gentleman who will receive the salary of $5,000. Consequently there will be no increased expenditure in the matter of salaries for conducting the work of the Commission. This work having grown to such magnitude as to justify the creation of a distinct bureau, with an official head, it is important that this officer should give to the work of the Commis- sion his entire time, instead of attending to matters connected with two or three different institutions. There will be no increase of salary and no additional expenditure of money. Mr. Stee te. Does the gentleman refer to Mr. Ferguson? Mr. Fetron. I do refer to Mr. Ferguson, a gentleman as to whom Professor Baird is upon record as saying that there was not in the United States a man who was his equal in iii of these fish industries. Mr. Cox. Mr. Chairman, I think I can answer satisfactorily th queries which haye been propounded on the other side. I would FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 10538 not obtrude myself in connection with this matter but for some rela- tion which I had in the early days to the Smithsonian Institution and my regard for the gentlemen who have been associated through that institution with the Fish Commission. Professor Baird, as we all know, became, after the death of Professor Henry, the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. He received a salary, but not from the Government. He was a beneficiary under the will of an Englishman—James Smithson. When we undertook, through the agency of the Government, to investigate the propagation of food-fishes in America, a measure was passed by Congress on the 9th of February, 1871, authorizing the President to appoint, for the purpose of taking charge of this work, someone connected either with the Smithsonian Institution or with the Government. Professor Baird at that time was connected with the Government ‘‘ National Museum.” He was an employee of the Government. Being an enthusiast in rela- tion to the propagation of food-fishes, having a thorough scientific training, he entered upon these researches con amore. He was selected by the President to undertake it. He undertook it with- out pay. The pay he received as secretary was perhaps adequate for his run- ning expenses as a citizen of Washington in such an eminent position, but he died a comparatively poor man, and his family, consisting of an infirm wife and an infirm daughter, are living in a house which they must sell or give up, unless they are more or less supported from some other source than remained to him at his death. After all his gratui- tous and beneficent services for the Government, they must yield up that comfort which they enjoyed while the husband and father was serving the Government. But of that I may speak on another and ‘more fitting occasion. I do not wish to discuss the question whether there is any necessity for this bureau. It exists. The only question now is, whether we shall sustain it in its present efficiency. Professor Baird inaugurated the inquiry to which I have adverted in 1871. He continued his service until the last year, when he died. On his decease Professor Goode was called to take his place. He was and is in frail health. He had been an assistant to Professor Baird and has been receiving $5,000 as such Assistant Fish Commissioner. Pro- fessor Goode, at the express request of the President, took charge of this trust temporarily, as understood. He is not able to keep up his relation with the Smithsonian and the Museum and with the Fish Commission also; so that he is see to resign that position as Fish Commissioner. Now the question comes up pation we shall continue this bureau. ‘%t does not call on us to pay any more money out of the Treasury as salary than has been paid to the Asssistant Commissioner. This was 1054 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. well stated by the gentleman. We propose to give the same sum to the officer created under this act as was paid to the assistant, namely, $5,000. The business of propagating our food-fishes is well appreciated by the people all over our country. Since Professor Baird began this work there has been sent out by tank, cans, and otherwise, throughout the land, from Texas to Maine, and from the Columbia River to the St. Johns, one hundred millions of young fish, or spawn for the propagation of this food. The report of Professor Goode (H. Mis. Doc. No. 39) to the present Congress shows the cost during the last fiscal year of the production, transportation, and distribution of these hundred millions from their sixteen hatching and rearing stations. ‘The propagation expenses was $130,000, the cost of fish ponds and distribution was $45,000; and the same sum for vessels engaged in the service. There are existing other appliances for the founding of this extensive and humane object, which J will not now dwell upon. The time has almost come prophesied by Professor Huxley, when an acre of water will almost produce as much food for the support of human life as an acre of land. The science of fish propagation is one of the marvels of our time. It is one of the miracles of physical culture. We have understood, appreciated, and encouraged by law this wonderful multiplication of food-fishes. If I am permitted to refer modestly to my travels, I will say that when I was coasting around Norway a scientist informed me—point- ing out over the Arctic Ocean, which we were inspecting—that there had been the year before a shoal of codfish near the Loféden Islands 1 mile in superficial extent, containing 150,000,000 cod; and that those - codfish had fed on 420,000,000 herring. There is no limit to the wonderful infinitude of these finny creatures of the deep. Professor Baird saw with generous vision this result of natural law. Although I believe the invention or discovery of this remarkable fecundity and mode of propagation in fish was made at an earlier date than 1871, still he utilized it. To be just in this connection, I may remark that before Professor Baird undertook this service, Dr. Gar- lick, an Ohio man, discovered the process. His is not a happy name, but his discovery was felicity itself to millions. Is it not a curious fact that Ohio always seem to be a little ahead of other States in cer- tain affairs—political or otherwise? Excuse my seeming forwardness in speaking of Ohio products, for I was born there myself. Nevertheless, Mr. Speaker, there never was an interest in this country so cared for by the Government as this of fish. Our first efforts, at least in New England, began with fish. -When our ances- tors—I refer to New England where I was educated—when our an- FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1055 cestors went to King James for a charter to go across seas and colonize Massachusetts, the King asked the Puritans— ‘* What is your object? What do you intend?” Their answer was: ‘‘To worship God and catch fish!” Then the king rejoined: ‘‘I give you the charter. ’ Fore Gad! it is the Apostle’s own calling!” Why, sir, even in the early churches of New England the early and pious Puritans used to sing: Ye monsters of the bubbling deep, Your Maker’s name upraise; Up from the sands ye codlings peep, And wag your tails always. So that in early New England the cure and care of fish was concom- itant with commerce, liberty, and sanctity. In later times New Eng- land has obtained Congressional enactments giving free salt for her fish, while the miserable man in Chicago can not get free salt for his pork. Congress has always had a kindly word for the fishermen. For many decades it gave bounties at so much per cod. These fishermen have not become less tenacious of their rights since the bounty ceased. They are a power in numbers and influence. They number a million or more of men constantly engaged in their hardy and hazardous occu- pation. Their calling is associated at the present time with some curi- ous wriggling in diplomacy. But wherever they are, and wherever they adventure, they should be cared for by the fostering arm of the Government. The main object of this bill, sir, is not to assist the fishermen so much as the consumers of fish. It would send out the seed broadcast, that food harvests may grow in all the waters of this land. I trust there will be nothing done here to impair the usefulness of this Bureau. I trust, as this bill takes no money out of the Treasury, that no further objection will be made to its passage; that the President may be able to select a good, practical man of science and energy, whether he be a Democrat or not, to occupy and honor the position. Iam not sure but that there may be found some good scientific Democrat in the country to administer this office. All the sciences can not be monopolized by the Republican party. There may be a Democrat discovered with the qualities of a good scientific fisherman. The President will find him. The President himself is somewhat of an expert in that line. At all events let us by this enactment enable him to select the right man for the position. So far as I am individually concerned I am not over eager whether he selects a Democrat or a Republican to carry out the humane and beneficent provisions proposed by this bill reported by my honored friend from Arkansas [Mr. Dunn], to whom I tender my thanks for the privilege of these desultory remarks. 1056 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Mr. Dunn. Mr. Speaker, I trust that the committee is now in the humor to rise and report this bill to the House; and I make that motion unless some other gentleman desires to be heard upon it. The motion was agreed to. The committee accordingly rose; and the Speaker having resumed the chair, Mr. SPRINGER reported that the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union, having had under consideration the bill (S. 261), had directed him to report the same to the House without amendment. The bill was passed. July 17, 1888. Statement of G. F. Edmunds to Committee on Appropriations Mr. James B. Breck. To what part of the bill do you wish to call the attention of the committee? Mr. G. F. Epmunps. I propose that you shall insert an amendment to pay Mrs. Professor Baird $50,000 for the fifteen years and a half of unrequited service that Professor Baird did for the United States; and this is my statement as a witness, which I have condensed as much as possible, to save your time: By the act of 9th February, 1871 (vol. 16, p. 594), Revised Statutes, section 4395, page 851, it was provided that— There shall be appointed by the President, with the advice and consent of the Senate, from among the civil officers or employees of the Government, a Commis- sioner of Fish and Fisheries, who shall be a person of proved scientific and practical acquaintance with the fish of the coast, and who shall serve without additional salary. Section 4396— The Commissioner of Fish and Fisheries shall prosecute investigations and inquir- ies on the subject, with the view of ascertaining whether any and what diminution in the number of the food-fishes of the coast and the lakes of the United States has taken place, and, if so, to what cause the same is due; and also whether any and what protective, prohibitory, or precautionary measures should be adopted in the premises, and shall report upon the same to Congress. From this it will be seen that the scope of the duties of the Com- missioner was limited to a purely scientific inquiry into an existing state of things, and it is apparent from the language of the statute that it was to be a temporary affair. Under this act Professor Baird (who was chon assistant secretary of the Smithsonian Institution at a salary of dollars) was appointed Commissioner to make these investigations, and he immediately entered upon the vigorous prosecution of his duties, and after his report Congress, in 1872, made provision for continuing the inquiry; and by the act of 10th June, 1872 (vol. 17, p. 350), it extended the FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1057 duties of the Commissioner to the entirely new work of the introduc- tion of shad into the waters of the Pacific States, Gulf States, and the Mississippi Valley, and of salmon, whitefish, and other useful food- fishes into the waters of the United States to which aey were best adapted. This enactment changed the character of the duties of the Com- missioner from that of mere scientific investigation into an extensive and most important administrative work, Sed! time, labor, and ‘responsibility many times greater than the inquiry to be made under the act first above mentioned into the causes of the decrease of food- fishes. From 1872 down to the time of Professor Baird’s death, in 1887, his work was continually increasing under the provisions of the acts a Congress passed from year to year, enlarging the area of his labors in respect of the hatching of fish and their establishment in all the waters of the United States, as well as the shipment of eggs and young fish to other countries having similar establishments, etc. And in addition to all this Professor Baird was required to take the respon- sibility of and provide for the exhibition of the fishery products, etc., of the United States at the Berlin International Exhibition, at the British International Exhibition, at the Philadelphia Centennial Exhibition, and at the New Orleans Exhibition, and he was also required to devote a great amount of time and labor, in the prepara- tion of statistics and furnishing facts for use on behalf of the United States before the Halifax Commission. And yet it was not until the year 1883 that provision was made for his having any responsible and official assistant. In all this work, scientific and administrative, he made himself familiar with every detail and gave many hours of - nearly every day in each year to the personal management and super- vision of it, to the great advancement not only of science and scien- tific knowledge, but to the successful development of the scheme of restocking the waters of the United States with fish as provided for in the acts of Congress; and his management of the fishery exhibits of the United States at the various exhibitions referred to conferred the greatest honor upon his country. ; During all this period of more than fifteen years I was a near neigh- bor and intimate friend, and saw him and his work almost constantly from week to week, and so I can state from personal knowledge that in my deliberate opinion his work as Commissioner of Fish and Fisheries occupied not less than six hours on an average of every day of the whole period. During a large part of this time he had his office at his house, occupying rooms set apart and devoted exclusively to these pur- poses, and he had the almost. constant assistance of his daughter in the examination of the very voluminous correspondence, the writing and revision of letters, and in all such incidental ways as that most compe- tent young lady was able to help her father; and a few years ago he H. Doe, 7832——67 1058 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. enlarged his house at an expense of many thousand dollars from the controlling motive of having more space for carrying on his Fish Com- mission work. From early morning until nearly noon he devoted him- self to itat his house constantly. He would then go to the Smithsonian Institution and spend several hours there in intense personal applica- tion and labor to his duties as assistant secretary and, after the death of Professor Henry, as secretary; and having fully performed all his duties there would return to his house and devote most of his evenings, and often far into the night again, to the work of the Fish Commission. I speak of all these details during these long years from intimate per- sonal knowledge of his course of life. He could almost never be per- suaded to take a holiday, when year after year his family and his inti- mate friends, who knew that he was overworking himself, would remon- strate and beg him to leave some share of these great responsibilities and exacting labors in other hands. The result with him was what many of his friends feared would happen—he literally worked himself to death in most valuable and meritorious and honorable service to the United States, the largest part of which was never contemplated nor provided for when his office of scientific investigation was created with- out a salary. In such a case it appears to me that both the dignity and the justice of the United States require that a suitable recognition of this unre- quited labor should be made to his widow, who has been for many years a great invalid, and who, with their daughter, is left in decidedly slender circumstances. i Here is a memorandum which I think was mostly made by Professor Baird himself about his work in the last year of his life, when he knew, and bis family did not know, that he was going to die, which I will read. Iam certain, privately, that Professor Baird left this memoran- dum, except perhaps the last word or two of it, among his papers for his wife. I will add that I dictated the paper, my own statement as a witness, without knowledge or recollection of the fact that such a mem- orandum as this existed. Then I came up again and asked Mr. Cleaves to let me see the papers, and I found this, which I had entirely forgotten. MEMORANDUM AS TO THE RELATIONSHIPS OF S. F. BAIRD TO THE U. S. FISH COM- MISSION. The Commission was established in 1871, with myself as Commissioner, solely for the purpose of investigating the alleged decrease of the food fishes of the seacoast and lakes of the United States, and its causes and remedies. The service was only expected to occupy the summer months of one or, at most, two years, requiring com- ~ paratively little trouble and responsibility, and an appropriation of $5,000 was made for the purpose the first year. The law expressly stipulated that no additional com- pensation was to be paid to the Commissioner for his work. In 1872 the subject of fish culture was added to the work to be done by the Com- mission, and an appropriation of $15,000 was made for continuing the inquiry into the food fishes and meeting the cost of the new division. FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1059 Year by year the appropriations were increased, the scope of the work enlarged, -and the labors of the Commissioner amplified in proportion, until, including the ap- propriations for the fiscal year 1886, the sum amounted (in all) to over $2,000,000. The average amount of time required of the Commissioner exclusively for the duties of the Commission is not less than six hours a day, mostly in the early morn- ing and in the evening, after the office work of the Smithsonian is completed. The Commission is organized on a business basis, corresponding to that of other bureaus of the Government, although more completely than most of them. The correspondence of the Commission is enormous; the letters received, and re- quiring the attention more or less direct of the Commissioner, amounting to at least 15,000 per annum, and as many more circulars and blanks. The letters written by the dictation of the Commissioner, or by his direction, and reviewed by him before signing, represent half that number. ‘The death of Professor Henry, in 1878, and the succession of the present Commis- sioner to the office of Secretary of the Smithonian Institution so greatly increased his work as to make it necessary to give up all outside work which has enabled him to add to his private revenue. For a number of years all the office accommodations and conveniences required by the Commission were furnished gratuitously by the Commissioner in his private resi- dence. From 1871 to 1875 one of the best rooms of his house on New York avenue was given up for the needs of the Commission, including office accommodation of the clerks. The increasing magnitude of the work made other additional space neces- sary, and the Commissioner built a large house on Massachusetts avenue, mainly for this purpose, arranging it entirely in the interest of the Commission. These accom- modations included two basement rooms with iron safe, closet, and other necessities. This for a time answered all the purposes of the Commission, but with the increasing growth it became inadequate, and an appropriation was obtained from Congress for renting a house next door to the Commissioner’s residence, and connected with it by an iron door, allowing free access between the two buildings. A few years later the accommodations again became insufficient, and the Commis- sioner extended his private residence for the purpose of obtaining an additional room. No rent was ever asked or received by the Commissioner for any of the quarters fur- nished by him. At present all the expenses of lighting, heating, etc., in the rooms of No. 1445 Massachusetts avenue are borne by the Commissioner. The rent paid by the Commissioner for his house on New York avenue was $55 per month, and the house was quite sufficient for his own needs. The cost of the building on Massachu- setts avenue has been not less than $30,000, plus the taxes and insurance and extra expense of maintaining so large an establishment, representing the increased cost to him of hardly less than $1,500 for continuing for fifteen years to act as the unpaid servant of the Government in connection with Fish Commission work. The alternation of the headquarters of the Fish Commission office for three or four months in the summer from Washington to some point on the seacoast from which investigations could be prosecuted made it necessary for the Commissioner to take his family with him, involving much additional expense in passenger fares, board, etc. The necessity of spending the summer in small fishing villages along the coast has also involved more or less inconvenience and almost privation. _ The construction of the Commissioner’s residence on Massachusetts avenue was made in part at the expense of Mrs. Baird’s share of her father’s property, and in part of the moneys earned by his own editorial work. If his money had not been invested in this manner it would have been invested otherwise, so as to have pro- duced a corresponding income, the house on New York avenue being amply suffi- cient for his needs. It may be safely said, therefore, that apart from any question of compensation for services rendered, the many questions connected with the accommodations of the Commission and the loss of interest on the investment—the 1060 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Commissioner has been a loser to the amount of from $1,800 to $2,000 a year; this, independent of the expenses of furnishing gas and coal, unreturned cost of the sum- mer work, etc. é Since the completion of the buildings at Woods Hole for the accommodation of the work of the commission, the commissioner has paid all expenses of board of visi- tors to the commission; this sum, in 1885 (including the board of his own family and that of visitors to the station), amounting to over $300. It may here be distinctly and emphatically stated that all the subsistence of visitors to the commission has been paid from the commissioner’s private funds. In conclusion, attention may be called to the fact that the commissioner receives his entire pay from the Smithsonian Institution, which is not a Government estab- lishment, and that consequently the Government does not make one cent of compen- sation to him either for his work as U. S. Fish Commissioner or as director of the National Musuem. There is and has been nothing to prevent his receiving pay as commissioner, even under the law of prohibition of double salaries. It may also be stated that, on several occasions, when it was proposed to pay him a salary he declined to entertain the proposition, on the ground that it might impair his usefulness as commissioner by the impression that he derived benefit from appropriations made for its maintenance. The fact may be well emphasized that the clause providing for noncompensation of the commissioner was inserted at the request of the commissioner; but that the increase in the duties and responsibilities was made by Congress at the suggestion of an outside association and not at that of the commissioner. ADDITIONAL MEMORANDA IN REGARD TO THE RELATIONSHIPS OFS. F. BAIRD TO THE U. 8. FISH COMMISSION. The act establishing the U. 8. Fish Commission provided that the commissioner should serve without additional salary. From the time of the appointment of the present commissioner to the secretaryship of the Smithsonian Institution, he has re- ceived no salary whatever from the Government; and therefore any compensation for the service would technically not be additional to anything already received. In view of this fact Mr. Edmunds proposed to ask for a specific appropriation to pay a salary, but the commissioner discountenanced the movement, on the ground that it would take away from that disinterestedness and freedom of action in requesting appropriations which were desirable under the circumstances. Some years ago the commissioner, feeling the burden of furnishing quarters to the commission, asked for an appropriation to pay for the renting of rooms or a building outside; but Mr. Holman, who was then chairman of the Appropriations Committee, declined to entertain the proposition, as he was opposed to anything ‘‘that looked like fastening an additional Bureau upon the Government.”’ It will, of course, be understood that the expense of keeping up a house large enough to furnish a number of rooms for the service of the Fish Commission, in addition to the needs of his own family, will be much greater than that of an ordinary private residence. The house contains twenty rooms, of which three are in constant use by the commission. The expense of lighting and heating a house of this magnitude amounts to about $600 per annum. Mr. Eugene Harr. Why did we not take this matter in hand years ago, and give Professor Baird a salary ? Mr. Epmunps. I proposed it to Professor Baird (and that is what his daughter or somebody must have referred to in making the end of that memorandum after he died), and Professor Baird said, ‘‘ No; Congress will do whatever they think is proper for me in the end, and I do not FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1061 want to have anybody say, as this thing is expanding all the time, that I am nagging around Congress to get something for myself; I am will- ing to trust the future for all that sort of thing when my work is done.” That was the reply he made to me. I.talked with Mr. Randall about it once, and Mr. Randall said it ought to be done, but the professor was so reluctant to bring himself in, that, under the circumstances, we never did anything. I introduced a bill, and I want to turn that bill into an amendment. The CHarrMAN. You want to have whatever we do put on this bill? Mr. Epmunps. Yes; that is exactly what I want, and it is perfectly suitable and proper if it is right to do it at all, because it is not a pri- vate claim, but is a miscellaneous donation that under the circumstances it is proper for Congress to make, if you think so. Mr. Hatz. How much is the amount? Mr. Epmunps. Fifty thousand dollars, which is just about $1,500 a year, including the rent of all the rooms; and, according to the rates you are paying for other rents, if they had been hired by the United States you would have paid more than that for the rent of rooms for doing this business. I will just change the bill to an amendment, so as to read: To enable the Secretary of the Treasury to pay Mrs. Mary H.C. Baird, widow of the late Spencer F. Baird, the sum of $50,000, full compensation for the services and expenses of the said Spencer F. Baird during his administration of the office of Com- missioner of Fish and Fisheries, from February 25, 1871, to the time of his death, in August, 1887. That is the amendment I desire to have made. Mr. Brecx. You have Professor Langley’s letter? ‘Mr. Epmunps. I have a copy of it here. The Cuarrman. We had better put that in the record. Mr. Brecx. I think so. It is a very full statement. Mr. Epmunps. It is an exact copy. The letter is as follows: SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, Washington, D. C., February 4, 1888. My Dear Sir: I have before me your letter asking for eserastiod in regard to the public services of the late Prof. Spencer F. Baird. It would have given me much pleasure to prepare a fuller statement than that which I now send od but I have here done what the time allowed. Professor Baird was appointed assistant secretary of the Smithsonian Institution July 5, 1850, and on October 3, at the age of 27, he entered upon his life work in connection with that foundation for ‘‘the increase and diffusion of knowlege among men.’’ In May, 1878, after the death of Professor Henry, he was, by the unani- mous vote of the Regents of the Institution, elected secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, a position which he held until his death, August 19, 1887. He was for thirty-seven years continuously in the scientific service of the Govern- ment. In connection with his duties as an officer of the Smithsonian Institution, his principal work was the development and care of the National Museum of the United 1062 - CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. States, which, under his wise administration, has always been an important element in the scientific and educational progress of this country, its scale of operations becom- ing each year greater and more highly appreciated both in this country and abroad. He was also especially instrumental in organizing the system of international exchanges of publications, which was always under his direct charge, and which has been one of the most important agencies in the development of the public libraries of the United States, particularly in the departments of pure and applied science. He was, furthermore, during his entire official career, directly or indirectly concerned in the organization and administration of the scientific work of the numerous expe- ditions and surveys sent out under Government auspices, from the time of the Wilkes ° exploring expedition until his death. The reports upon the natural history of the Pacific Railroad survey, Mexican Boundary survey, and many of the other surveys of the West, were prepared under his direction, and the two volumes of the Report of the Pacific Railroad Survey devoted to mammals and birds were written by him and are still standard works of reference. In addition to these reports, he was the author of several hundred important papers upon the natural history and natural resources of the United States. In 1876 he was a member of the board on behalf of the United States Executive Departments at the International Exhibition of 1876, and the collections prepared under his direction were acknowledged to be among the ~ most instructive and impressive exhibited on that occasion. I have thus briefly alluded to these labors to show that his position as an officer of the Smithsonian Institution was not a sinecure, but that he devoted to it, to the Museum, and to other allied Government interests the full time and labors of an excep- tionally active and conscientious official. In spite of this, and in addition to it, his most important work, from an administrative and economic standpoint, and certainly the most self-sacrificing work of his life, was begun at the time of the organization of the United States Commission of Fish and Fisheries in 1871, when Professor Baird was appointed commissioner, an office which he held in addition to all the preceding, and to the duties of which he gave himself uninterruptedly during the remainder of his life. I mean to say that he served continuously in both capacities, doing, not figuratively but literally, more than the work of two active men, in order to do this working ordinarily and constantly over twelve or fourteen hours a day, on Sundays as well as week days. During the sixteen years in which he was constantly at his post he never deputed his responsibilities to another, except during the five months pre- ceding hisdeath. There can be no doubt that his death was hastened many years, not by his independent regular labors as an officer of the Smithsonian, but by the labor, anxieties, and responsibilities of his peculiar position as Fish Commissioner, which became more burdensome each year with the expansion of his work.! After this, it is saying little to add that out of his slender private means he gave the equivalent of at least $1,500 per annum, for sixteen years, to the commission, in the form of uncharged house and office rent. As Commissioner of Fisheries he rendered a twofold service. The scientific work, which was considered by him to be of the utmost value as a foundation for the prac- tical work which was to follow, has been exceedingly extensive and important, and the achievements of the United States Government in this direction are recognized throughout the world as evidence of its enlightened and liberal attitude toward sci- entific research. Fifteen years ago less was known in this country of the natural history of our waters than perhaps in any other civilized country of the world. In 1887, however, it was generally conceded by foreign naturalists that the United States was further advanced than any other country in this department of science. ' Norr.—It is, at the same time, but proper to say that this expansion was depre- cated rather than recommended by him, and was the result of the interest exhibited by the public at large in the advancement of the work of fish culture. FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1063 The scientific work of the Commission has always been conducted with reference to definite and practical results, and thé economic side of the work of the Fish Commis- sion is comparatively in a still more advanced condition. It seems scarcely necessary to dwell upon the results in fish-culture attained by the Commission under Professor Baird’s direction. You are thoroughly familiar with the manner in which certain fisheries, such as the shad fishery of the Atlantic coast, the salmon fishery of the Pacific coast, and the whitefish fishery of the Great Lakes, have been saved from destruction; how the Asiatic carp has been planted in the 20,000 or more ponds and lakes in almost every township in the United States; how the shad fishery has been established in unfamiliar waters, such as the Ohio River and Pacific Ocean; and, in addition to this, how many other steps of great magnitude have been made in the art of fish-culture. I dare not attempt to estimate the practical value of the work of the Commission to the country, but can not doubt that it amounts to very many millions of dollars, I presume you are familiar with Mr. Goode’s ‘‘ Review of what has been accomplished by the Fish Commission in fish-culture and in the investigation of American fisheries;”’ but I venture to send herewith a copy of this pamphlet, and to direct your special attention to pages 26 to 34, in which are quoted numerous commendations of the Fish Commission from the principal authorities of Great Britain, Norway, Holland, Ger- many, Belgium, France, and other European nations. Professor Huxley, in an ad- dress at the London Fisheries Exhibition, said that he did not think ‘‘that any nation at the present time had comprehended the question of dealing with fish in so thorough, excellent, and scientific a spirit as that of the United States;’’ while M. Raveret- Wattel, the principal French authority on this subject, states that ‘‘to this day pisciculture has nowhere produced results which can be compared with those obtained in the United States.’’ No one can question that the peculiar excellence of the work of our Government has been directly or indirectly due to the presence of Professor Baird at the head of.the Commission. He had no rivals, and during his administra- tion no word of criticism was ever uttered by competent persons. All this, it may well be remembered, was accomplished while filling effectively the distinct duties of an officer of the Smithsonian Institution, for which alone he was paid. And it may be added that during the first half of his term of service as Com- missioner, and while he was assistant secretary of the Smithsonian, his entire salary was less than that received by several of his assistants during the last few years. In reference to the possible precedent of the action of Congress in the case of the late Professor Henry, I would state that a communication from the Secretary of the Treasury was received by the House of Representatives June 4, 1878, and by the Sen- ate June 5, 1878, recommending an appropriation of $500 for each year during which the late Professor Henry was employed as a member of the Light-House Board, for the benefit of his family. On June 20, 1878, an act was passed ‘‘to pay to the legal representatives of the late Joseph Henry, for services rendered by him as member and president of the Light-House Board, $11,000.’’ (Second session, Forty-fifth Congress, p. 214. ) In the absence of time for a fuller statement, let me ask your attention to the few words in which the benefits to his country of Professor Baird’s labors were described by a recent most competent biographer: “‘The Fish Commission was an agency of research; but it was more. He made it an agency by which science is applied to the relief of the wants of mankind; by which a cheap, nutritious, healthful, and luxurious food is to be given to the millions of men. .He affirmed that for the production of food an acre of water was more than equal to 10 acres of land, thus giving to the gloomy doctrine of Malthus its ultimate refutation, and clearing away the veil of despair from the horizon of the poor; for when the sea shall serve man with all the food that can be gathered from its broad expanse, the land will not contain the millions whom it is thus possible to supply.” 1064 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Professor Baird’s services as Fish Commissioner were entirely unremunerated. When he knew he was dying, looking to the position of his family and the slender provision that the sacrifice of all opportunities for private gain had left, he only told them that he could not but think that Congress, in view of these sixteen years of unrequited service to his country, might be trusted to see that justice was done. I am, sir, yours, very respectfully, S. P. LANGLEY. Hon. James B. BEcx, U. S. Senate. July 27, 1888—Senate. The sundry civil bill being under consideration, an amendment was offered to insert, on page 49, after line 19: To enable the Secretary of the Treasury to pay Mrs. Mary H.C. Baird, widow of the late Spencer F. Baird, $50,000, in full compensation for the services and expenses of the said Spencer F. Baird during his administration of the office of Commissioner of Fish and Fisheries, from February 25, 1871, to the time of his death, in August, 1887. Mr. James H. Berry. I would like to inquire of the Senator from Iowa how itis that, although Professor ‘Baird was to receive no salary, this full sum is now due for the entire time of his service? My recol- lection of the law is that the Fish Commission should be appointed from employees of the Government and was to receive no additional salary. This appropriation of $50,000 is for the entire time that Pro- fessor Baird was in office, from 1871 to the date of his death. I would like to inquire how this comes. | Mr. Auuison. If the Senator from Arkansas will take the report of the committee (Report No. 1814), and will turn to page 100 of that report, and read carefully the statement made there respecting the services of Professor Baird in this regard, and his relations to the Government as Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, I think he will be convinced that this is a just and proper appropriation for the eminent services of Professor Baird during the long period of his sery- ice as Chief of the Fish Commission. And in order to give Senators an opportunity to make an examination of this testimony and statement, I will ask that this amendment may be passed over until the bill is gone through with, or at least until Senators may have an opportunity of examining the report. The Presipinc Orricer. That will be agreed to if there be no objection. July 28, 1888—Senate. The sundry civil bill was considered as in Committee of the Whole. Mr. James H. Berry. When the amendment now under considera- tion was reached yesterday I asked the Senator from Iowa [Mr. Alli- son] to state why the salary of Professor Baird had not been previ- ously paid. He referred me to the report of- the committee, and especially to a statement made by the Senator from Vermont [Mr. OE EEE eee FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1065 Edmunds]. I have carefully examined that statement, and find the facts to be about as follows: In February, 1871, there was an act of Congress passed providing that the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, should appoint from the civil officers or employees of the Government a Commissioner of Fish and Fisheries, and it was especially and particularly provided in the act that he should receive no additional salary. It is stated in the report that Professor Baird at that time was assistant secretary of the Smithsonian Institu- tion. He was appointed as such Commissioner. It is stated in this report that he was not an officer or employee of the Government at the time of this appointment, and therefore that the question of a double salary, which is prohibited by the statute, could not apply. If he was not an officer or an employee of the Gov- ernment, then he was appointed contrary to the provisions of the act of Congress, because the act specially provided that the Commissioner should be a civil officer or employee of the Government. It is stated in the report also that subsequently to that time additional duties were imposed upon the Commissioner of Fish and Fisheries, and it is stated and I admit that Professor Baird performed the duties successfully and well for the period of about fifteen and a half years. At no time during his life did he ever apply for any salary for act- ing as Fish Commissioner. It is further stated in the report that he occupied and used two rooms in his private dwelling as an office for the purpose of discharging the duties pertaining to this commission; and it is also stated that a reasonable rental for those rooms, or, rather, if they were paid for as the Government usually pays for renting prop- erty in this city, they would have been worth probably $1,500 a year. The Senator from Vermont [Mr. Edmunds] says that this is not a private claim. I submit, Mr. President. that if Professor Baird hada claim against the Government for rent paid for the Government, then it should be presented as a claim, and it ought to go to the Committee on Claims, and there be reported to the Senate and take the usual course of any other claim. Mr. I. G. Harris. I wish to ask the Senator from Arkansas if his investigation has enabled him to inform the Senate what salary Pro- fessor Baird received as Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution; and if he is not able to answer, then I should be glad to have the chairman of the Committee on Appropriations or some other Senator give that information. Mr. Berry. I am able to answer that. He received a salary of $6,000 per annum as Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution; that was the sum he received in that capacity from the time of his appoint- ment in 1878 until his death in 1887. As I was stating, if this is a claim against the Government, either for salary or for house rent, then it ought to take the usual course of 1066 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. claims and ought not to be placed on this sundry civil bill. The Senator from Vermont, however, in his statement says that it is not a claim; he says that it is ‘‘a miscellaneous donation;” and because it is a miscellaneous donation, Mr. President, I am opposed to it. If the Government is indebted to Professor Baird, then the Government ought to pay whatever it owes him; but if this is a donation, miscella- neous or otherwise, as stated by the Senator from Vermont, then I submit that we have no right to make it. The money in the Treasury of the United States comes from taxes collected from the people. The money is collected for public pur- poses, not for private purposes. It is collected by authority of the Constitution, which authorizes it to be collected to pay public debts, to provide for the common defense and the general welfare, and if it is to be treated as a fund which belongs simply to members of Congress to donate to whomsoever they may think worthy and deserving, then it simply becomes a question as to what persons can bring the most influence to bear on these two Houses in order to receive that donation. If the Senator from Vermont is correct when he says this is a dona- tion, then Congress has no right to donate the money. If it is a pri- waite claim or debt, then it ha no business upon this appropriation bill. I submit, caihacaidte: that when the law expressly provided that no salary showld be paid, eee for fifteen years Professor Baird made no claim for salary, it can be nothing else than an absolute donation or gift to Professor Baird’s widow. If he was not willing to perform those duties without salary, if it was intended that eventually the Government should be called upon to pay a salary, then it ought to have been stated in the act of Congress under which he was appointed, and we ought not to have been misled by saying that no salary should be paid and now come in with a claim of $50,000 as salary. If it is true that he was not an officer of the Government, if he was not an employee of the Government, then he was appointed in direct contradiction to and in the face of the statute which provided for this appointment. If he was such officer, then he was receiving a salary of $6,000 a year, and I care not whether it was paid by the Government or paid by the Smithsonian Institution. There is a general statute that says that no officer employed by the Government shall be paid a double salary; and in either case this can not be paid. I have no doubt Professor Baird performed the duties attending the position which he held with great fidelity; I have no doubt his widow is a worthy lady; but I insist if he has no claim, if we do not owe him this money, Congress has no right to make an appropriation to ane her this money. Another thing: If this is a donation or gift, why shall it be put upon the sundry civil bill, a general appropriation bill? It may be held, and the President of the United States may conclude, that Ganges FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1067 has no right to donate the public money; he may take that view of it, that his oath of office and the Constitution of the United States require him not to sign a bill which is a mere gift, as the Senator from Ver- mont says this is. If that be true, then you propose to put upon a general appropriation bill and force him either to approve that which his conscience does not approve, or to veto one of the general appro- priation bills of this session of Congress. That, it seems to me, ought to be a sufficient objection to putting it upon this appropriation bill. If there is a just and valid claim either for rent or for salary, let it go to the Committee on Claims and let it take its chances with every other claim that comes before this body, and not seek upon this general appropriation bill to give $50,000 of the money which we have no right to give, which does not belong to us, which the Constitution does not authorize us to give. If we do not owe the money, then it is simply a gift and can be nothing more and nothing less. The PRESIDENT pro tempore (Mr. J. J. InGauus). The question recurs upon agreeing to the amendment proposed by the Committee on Appropriations. Is the Senate ready for the question ? Mr. J. H. Reacan. Mr. President, I knew Professor Baird very well during his life time and respected him very greatly, and I take it that no one knew him but did respect him and respects his memory; and in what I shall say I shall bear in mind the great value of his services and his worth as a citizen and as a man. This amendment proposes to give his widow $50,000 in considera- tion of services rendered by Professor Baird to the Government. The question is raised whether he was an officer of the Government of the United States in his capacity as Secretary of the Smithsonian Institu- tion. By the act of Congress of 1846 for the organization of the Smithsonian Institution, it is provided that a Secretary shall be appointed. It does not specify what his compensation shall be, and I understand that his compensation has been paid out of the fund arising from the interest on the donation given by Mr. Smithson. So, while he was not compensated out of the Public Treasury, he was appointed under an act of Congress. I do not. know whether that would pre- clude his right to receive an additional salary or not, and it is not material, in the view I take of the question, whether it would or not. In Europe, under Great Britain, Germany, and other governments, we find large appropriations made for individuals out of the public treasury. The amounts paid annually out of the public treasury of Great Britain to the royal family go up into millions, because it is the policy of that country to maintain royalty and to maintain an aristoc- racy. In this country it has not until lately been any part of our policy. Weare gradually drifting into the policy of creating an aris- tocracy supported out of the Treasury, who render no service and who are paid at the expense of other people. I do not wish to see this go 1068 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. further than it has already gone if it can be arrested. IJ do not think there is any hope of arresting it, for the tendency for a good many years past has been not only to build upa central republic, but to build up with it by class legislation an aristocracy. Any person watching the operations of the Government can not fail to see that this is the drift of the Government, to centralism and to an aristocracy, besides general privileged classes. Professor Baird was not a very great sufferer. From 1878 to 1887, a period of nine years and three months, he was receiving a salary of $6,000 a year, aggregating $55,500, that he received during that period as Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. Previous to 1878 he received a salary of $2,500 a year as Assistant Secretary. If it is thought that his services as Fish Commissioner merit addi- tional compensation to that which he received for the services which he rendered as Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, I would not object to a reasonable appropriation, if it can be lawfully made; but when it comes to adding $3,333 extra compensation annually for fifteen successive years, making $50,000 more to his compensation, it seems to me that it is going too far. That is what it would be; $3,333 a year for fifteen years in order to get $50,000 after his having received $55,500 during thatsame period. Unless the committee sees proper to modify and to reduce this amount to a reasonable compensation I shall vote against its adoption; and while I do not wish to raise a question of order upon this amendment unless they do so, I shall raise a question _ of order under Rule XVI, which provides: And no amendments shall be received to any general appropriation bill, the effect of which will be to increase an appropriation already contained in the bill, or to add anew item of appropriation, unless it be made to carry out the provisions of some existing law, or treaty stipulation, or act, or resolution previously passed by the Senate during that session, or unless the same be moved by direction of a stand- ing or select committee of the Senate, or proposed in pursuance of an estimate of the head of some one of the departments. This amendment does not come under the authority of either of those provisions. I take it that being reported by the Committee on Appropriations is not a compliance with the meaning and purpose of that part of the rule which says: All amendments to general appropriation bills moved by direction of a standing or select committee of the Senate, proposing to increase an appropriation already contained in the bill, or to add new items of appropriation, shall, at least one day before they are considered, be referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and when actually proposed to the bill no amendment proposing to increase the amount stated in such amendment shall be received. This evidently shows that the rule means that some other committee shall recommend it to the Committee on Appropriations; but if that > FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1069 view were not sustainable, then under the fourth clause I think the amendment would clearly not be allowable, which clause provides that 4. No amendment, the object of which is to provide for a private claim, shall be received to any general appropriation bill unless it be to carry out the provisions of an existing law or a treaty stipulation, which shall be cited on the face of the amendment. | This is purely a private claim in the nature of a relief bill, and, as suggested by the Senator from Arkansas [Mr. Berry], a donation by the Government. It has not been estimated for by any department that I am aware of. It does not arise under any law or under any treaty, and is not, therefore, receivable. I said that I did not propose to ask the President of the Senate to rule upon the point of order unless the committee refuse to make a reduction so as to make a reasonable allowance to the widow of Pro- fessor Baird for the services he rendered as Fish Commissioner. If they will put the sum at $10,000, or even at $15,000, I will not oppose it if there is authority for the passage of such a bill, as to which ques- tion I hardly feel prepared to determine now, vecause I do not know whether his being appointed under an act of Congress and compen- sated out of the Smithsonian fund would constitute him an officer of the Government receiving salary so as to preclude the payment of another salary. As I have doubt on that subject, and as I know that Professor Baird rendered most valuable services to the Government while he was receiving a large salary for other services, still I will not object to voting $10,000 or $15,000 to his widow. Mr. 8. M. Cuttom. Iam inclined to think myself that the sum speci- fied in the committee’s amendment is too large. I appreciate the serv- ices of Professor Baird to this country and to the world very greatly, but it seems to me that the sum of $50,000 is too much money, and I should be inclined to propose an amendment to the amendment of the Committee on Appropriations reducing the amount to $25,000. Mr. Harris. Mr. President, I suppose there is no Senator on this floor who did not appreciate very highly the ability, the patriotism, and the public services of Professor Baird. It does not matter, how- ever, to me how the question may be decided as to whether he was or was not technically an officer of the Government. It is certainly true that he accepted a public service. He accepted it on terms satisfactory to himself. He rendered the service in a way eminently satisfactory to the country, and he received the salary for which he agreed to ren-- der it. After his death, to appeal to the sympathies of the two Houses of Congress to donate to his widow or to his estate the sum of $50,000, or $25,000 as suggested by the Senator from Illinois, or any other sum, is a precedent to which I do not intend to commit myself. It is wrong 1070 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. in principle. It is a precedent that will return to haunt us for every day and every year that we may continue here. I shall vote against the amendment in any form it may be presented. Mr. W. Cau. Mr. President, I take it that it will not be disputed that every act of legislation to be justified must be based upon some public policy, or it must be in the line of some wise and reasonable public policy. Suppose we examine the proposition of the Senator from Tennessee, and the Senator from Texas, and the Senator from Arkansas in the light of this truth. What is the proposition, and what is the public policy which they avow upon this floor as the foun- dation of their action here? It is to discourage all devotion to the public service, superior merit, and disinterestedness. A man may serve the country. faithfully, fie may be a great public benefactor, as Professor Baird was; he may give his services to the Government ane the people asa penebrobar: and those services are not to be measured by the gratitude of the people and the value to the world and to his country, but by the idea that he did not drive a hard bargain with the Government; that he was disinterested in his devotion to the public service; that, like Shylock the Jew, he must make a contract and take the pound literally, and take it as his pay. Mr. President, governments are not based upon the idea of contract- ing for services. They act with the power of the law and of command, and they compensate according to the service rendered. There is no other correct principle upon which to found our action. The public policy of every government must be to encourage emi- nent virtue, eminent ability. And how encourage it? By refusing to reward it? By saying that this man’s wife shall be left in comparative destitution after he devoted his life and gave the service of his house to the Government, giving to the Government the offices in which these duties were performed for fifteen years, which is in itself, I am told, very nearly worth, at the price the Government is paying rent in this city, the amount proposed to be given to this man, who devoted himself to what? To enlarging the field of subsistence, the food sup- ply of mankind. He gave his nights and his days, and it is said lost his life at a comparatively early age from the severity and continuous- ness of his labor. Because he refused to receive compensation and gave this service voluntarily we are told that the public policy and-safe precedent for- bid that we should be generous and liberal to those whom he has left behind; that‘is, that we shall say to everybody, ‘‘ Our public policy is to discourage and to censure and to punish the man who exhibits superior capacity, superior morality, devotion, and disinterestedness in the country’s service.” FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1071 Mr. President, there never was and there never will be a govern- ment, and there ought not to be a government, that is based upon such principles and such a policy. Mr. Cuttom. I move, in line 22, to strike out the word “fifty,” before ‘‘ thousand,” and to insert ‘‘ twenty-five,” if the amendment is in order. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The amendment of the Senator from Illinois to the amendment of the Committee on Appropriations will be stated. Mr. Cuttom. I ask the chairman of the committee whether he will not accept the amendment I propose? The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The amendment will be stated. The CureF CLERK. On page 49, line 22, in the amendment of the Committee on Appropriations, it is proposed to strike out ‘‘ fifty” and insert ‘‘ twenty-five,” so as to read ‘*$25,000.” The PrEstpENT pro tempore. The question is on agreeing to the amendment of the Senator from Illinois to the amendment of the Committee on Appropriations. Mr. Wii. B. Atuison. If it is the general sense of the Senate that the sum of $50,000 is too large, I shall yield, of course, to that judgment. I shall be glad if the sense of the Senate will be that some sum is equitably and fairly due to the widow of Professor Baird. He certainly performed very eminent service, and I do not think that he was, in the sense stated by the Senator from Tennessee and others, an employee of the Government. He received his compensation from and his services were rendered for an institution founded by a person not a citizen of his own country. His salary was paid from the Smithsonian fund and was not appro- priated from the Treasury. He devoted the years of his life from 1871 largely to this service, and, as has been stated by the Senator from Florida, he not only did that, but contributed what others would have charged a considerable sum for annually, namely, the place where the work of the Fish Commission was done. I think Professor Baird’s services deserve some recognition at the hands of Congress. Mr. Harris. Will the Senator from Iowa allow me to ask him if he holds that the Government owes to the estate of Professor Baird a debt? Mr. Atuison. If the Government could be sued as a citizen could be sued in the courts, it is probable that Professor Baird’s representa- tives could not recover from the Government for the service, because he never made any charge for the service or pretended to do so. Mr. Harris. Will the Senator allow me to ask him if he does not recognize the amendment as proposing to take out of the Treasury and donate in the form of a gift in recognition of distinguished services the amount of money proposed to be appropriated 1072 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Mr. Auuison. Practically that is just what it does. Mr. Harris. That is what I know. Mr. Atuison. It proposes to give a sum of money for distinguished services rendered to our Government and to our people and to mankind without compensation. Somebody has said that he is a public bene- factor who makes two blades of grass grow where one grew before. Professor Baird made thousands of fish grow where only one grew before, and he rendered in that scientific work of his a service, not only to our own country, but to every country on the globe, which deserves the recognition of some government, and I think it is a small recognition to give him the sum proposed by the report of the Senate Committee on Appropriations. Mr. Harris. If the Senator will allow me to ask him one other question, I will promise to ask no more. Iam charmed with the frankness of the answers of the Senator. My question is this, and it is a pretty broad one: Does the Senator from lowa hold that we have the constitutional power to levy and collect taxes and donate the money so collected to any object that we may think meritorious? Mr. Auuison. The constitutional question I prefer not to argue just now. I could cite numerous precedents where we have done a great many things in that direction. Mr. Harris. I have no respect for those. I want the opinion of the Senator from Iowa as to the constitutional question. Mr. W. M. Stewart. I should like in this connection to ask the Sen- ator from Tennessee a question. Mr. Harris. I am very ready to answer any question the Senator from Nevada desires to ask me. Mr. Stewart. Does not the Senator think that the Government of the United States is under the same moral obligation to pay for bene- ficial services rendered that an individual would be where the services were rendered without a contract, or where for some technical reason no recovery could be had? Mr. Harris. I commenced my inquiry by asking if the Government owed a debt, and that certainly meant whether by express or implied contract. The answer was that it did not. The second answer was that this was a donation. The Senator can deal with that question as he pleases. If the Government owes a debt, no matter whether by express or implied contract, no Senator would go further in the direc- tion of paying it than I would; but I am not here to make donations. Mr. Stewart. If the Senator means by a debt only such matter as can be collected in a court, then we had better abolish the Committee on Claims and all other committees which are here daily considering equitable claims, claims which appeal to the conscience of the Govern- ment where services have been rendered and the party has not been compensated. I understand that Congress has regarded itself from FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1073 _ time immemorial asa kind of court of chancery to consider claims against the Government which could not be recognized, which the Goy- ernment does not regard as legal obligations, and Congress will not delegate to any tribunal the power to enforce them; but it has been in the habit, during all the time it has been constituted, to consider claims of an equitable character. It seems to me that whena man voluntarily, without compensation, renders services of the great value that this man did, to say that he should not be compensated, that it did not raise an equitable obligation which Congress should consider, is to repudiate all considerations of equitable claims in Congress. It seems to me that the services in this case were meritorious accord- ing to any idea I can conceive of, and that they were vastly more valuable than $50,000. They were rendered through years of diligent service by an eminent man who was not in the habit of driving hard bargains, but who was devoted to his country, and who developed a great industry. The Government and the people have had the advan- tage of his services. It appears to me that the Government would be very unmindful of its duties and obligations to its citizens if it would not reward such services as these. > Mr. Henry W. Buarr. I should like to ask the Senator from Ten- nessee a question. I ask him where he finds the constitutional power for the Government to pay the expenses of burying a dead Senator who dies at home in vacation ? Mr. Harris. I do not know that I can find that at all; I finda i thou- sand things done that I regret to see. The records Beasts with uncon- stitutional usurpations of power. I regret that it is so. Mr. Buarr. Does the Senator think that an assumption of unconsti- tutional power? Mr. Harris. I am not prepared to say that I do or that I do not, because I have not looked narrowly to that question; but does the Senator from New Hampshire hold this to be a debt to Professor Baird? Mr. Buarr. I do not know the circumstances of the case. Mr. Harris. I suppose not. Mr. Buatr. I have been present only a few ionic during the discussion, but from what I know of Professor Baird and his work I think we should give $25,000 if there is any want on the part of his family, and I would give it in the same way that I think it is essential that the Government of the United States shall be empowered to do a decent and fair thing, exactly as much so as an individual citizen. Mr. G. F. Hoar. Mr. President, the case is exactly this: A citizen of a foreign country made a munificent donation to the people of the United States for the advancement of science, and a distinguished man whose life had been devoted to natural science was appointed to admin- ister, that fund, and was paid for it. He gave one man’s full work, H. Doc. 732 68 1074 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. “in the prime of life, when he was at his best in body and intellect. He received from that fund a moderate'salary, a salary probably nota tenth part of what he could have commanded by giving his scientific attainments to the service of manufacturing or railroad or other busi- ness interests. He was one of the great men of his day. Being paid for his services to science, not by salary, but by simply having ren- dered them, that account was made up. But in addition to one man’s work he did voluntarily and without compensation in the service of this people the full work of two men more. He originated, organized, administered the great National Museum, and he rendered in that a service which as business men pay business agents would not have been half compensated by any salary like that which he was receiving as Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. In addition to that he originated and executed experiments and sci- entific work, the result of which by the common consent of all men conversant with the subject is to be that it will be much easier not only to supply the present generation of Americans with healthful, abund- ant, and cheap food, but he has shown us how to support and feed the hundreds of millions who are to come to this continent from all parts of the world and who are to be born here for generations upon ger erations to come. That wasa gratuity. That was the greatest bene- faction, with very few exceptions if with any exception, which God. has given it to any human being in our day to render to his kind. I wish I could have the attention of the Senate fora moment. I think I have something to say which is worth while for my honorable friends to hear, if they will do me the great favor to listen. I say that this man in devising and executing successfully these experiments has not only furnished our generation with cheap and abundant food, but has made it possible hereafter, in all probability, unless the judgment of scientific men is mistaken, to feed amply and cheaply the hundreds upon hundreds of millions who are to people this continent in no remote future. In rendering that benefit to us and to future time this man sacrificed his life. After a full day’s work in his other office he devoted without vacation, without rest, without pause, spring, summer, autumn, and winter, the year through, every hour, every minute, every second which he could snatch from his sleep. In rendering that service the strong, vigorous brain and body broke down. Professor Baird gave his life in rendering this service to mankind in the very prime and glory of his great intellect and his great physical frame just as certainly as any soldier ever gave his life on the field of battle. Mr. President, I do not believe that the American people have such a constitution of government that there is‘nobody authorized so far to express the gratitude of the American people for that illustrious sery- ice as to make a decent provision for the widow that shall not come a FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1075 - from private charity. If the American Congress can not do this thing, the result is it can not be done on this continent. If the authority is not vested in these Chambers, it is not vested anywhere. This was not a service to the State of Tennessee or to the State of Massachusetts; it was a service to the United States of America; and we have the same constitutional right to see that when this man gave his life for us in this way without asking terms, without demanding compensation, without thinking of pay, that at least there shall be some little pittance which shall save his wife and his daughter from. the almshouse. I want to know if on the narrowest construction of the terms it is not for the general welfare to Have it understood and to have a policy adopted that when men do these things they shall be compensated. ’ When these things are done in other governments, the man is raised to the peerage, vast tracts of land and vast funds are provided from the public treasury, and the family goes down fora thousand years, it goes down until it is extinct, honored and respected and raised above the rest of its fellow-citizens for the single service. Can we not do for the widow of Professor Baird a thousandth part as much as England has been doing for ten centuries for the race of some Norman robber who came over the sea with William the Conqueror? It is for the general welfare that when men are sacrificing themselves in such services to this country they should at least know that the country has a power and a disposition which will not let their* widows and their children go to the poorhouse. We have done it a hundred times. A man in the Treasury a few years ago, after doing his duty asa clerk ata salary of $1,200 or $1,500 a year, devised some salary tables, which he worked on at night, and saved to the people who had to pay the vast number of salaries which are paid the labor of calculating in each one the fraction of a quarter, the fraction of a month, and the income tax, and all the deductions. We sent to the Court of Claims by the authority of this body last year that case, and the Senate passed for that little paltry year’s service a bill within three or four weeks giving to that man $1,200 or. $1,500, I do not remember exactly how much; the chairman of the Committee on Claims knows what compensation was given for that service. Is it possible that we have a Constitution which has banished from this whole American continent, from the Atlantic to the Pacific, and from Canada to the Gulf, the power to be exercised anywhere of show- ing our gratitude to a national benefactor? Is the one supreme lux- ury which is given to the human soul, the luxury of gratitude, denied by our Constitution to this great American people? The Senator from Tennessee may believe it; I do not. Would not the Senator from Tennessee vote for a monument to the memory of Professor Baird? Has he not voted for a hundred monu- 1076 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. © ~ ments to great soldiers and sailors of the war of the Revolution and of the later war? ; Mr. Harris. He allowed the Senator from Massachusetts to vote for them. Mr. Hoar. Who would like to see the monument to Professor Baird, with the inscription of this splendid and magnificent service, paid for by the Congress of the United States, and then have it written on its reverse: ‘‘N. B. His wife and children died in the poorhouse because the Senator from Tennessee did not think it constitutional to give them $25,000?” Mr. W. M. Evarrs. Mr. President, I can not allow this item to pass without some notice from me. © I certainly can not think that the Senator from Tennessee supposes that there is not lodged in the two Houses of Congress the power of disposing of money in the Treasury as the two Houses shall regard useful to the public interest. No court, if there were courts with strict authority to keep us within our duties, could say that an effort by a nation to recognize and com- pensate services of a citizen was ultra vires for the nation that had power to apply money to the public welfare. If the public welfare can be consulted in advance for what it will gain for public welfare, it can examine for itself after the service has been performed, seeing whether it was not for the public welfare, and whether it is not for the public welfare that such services should be rewarded. It is therefore a figure of speech to say that to a nationa debt is not a debt because it is one of gratitude, of duty, and of encouragement in the future as well as reward in the past, and that a debt of a nation is to be measured on a book-account debt and on proof in a piepoudre court. Mr. President, I want to look at the situation relieved from every- thing but the most distinct and direct examination of the attitude of the family of Professor Baird to this nation upon what none dispute about as the facts of thesituation. Professor Baird, it seems, notwith- standing great occupations and valuable and brilliant services to science and the world, was so in love with this industry that if he did not invent it he raised it from the condition of an amusement to that of the feeding of a nation. He would not let it go because he would serve his family, his name, his patriotism, and the welfare of this country. He knew, we knew, we now know, that if these years of service had been relinquished by Professor Baird there was nobody who would carry on with the same volume and the same rapidity the development of thisaffairas he did. When he has died, in the strength of his man- hood, entitled to calculate upon as long a life and as enduring a health as any man who ever undertook the trust and services of life, when it is over and ends at the zenith, it is discovered that besides these double services the compensation received has every dollar of it been FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1077 - consumed in the support of himself and his wife and his daughter. In looking back at the record of the service, it is discovered that it had passed sub silentio, without the observation of this people or of Con- gress, that all this had been done by him without stipulating for pay- ment or exacting compensation; and now it is said that when looking at the past we see that though these services might be done by the ‘strong man in his life and his confidence in its endurance, in the actual - situation of his death it has all been done at the expense of his wife -and his daughter. The nation looking at that can not say, ‘We might have accepted it from you, we might have endured it without being too careful of our own duties toward you;” but when we find at the end all that we are asked to do is to do afterwards what would have been just to have done at the time, how are we to discharge that obligation and upon what direct proposition or consideration on both sides? Read the simple clause of the amendment of the committee in the bill: To enable the Secretary of the Treasury to pay Mrs. Mary H. C. Baird, widow of the late Spencer F. Baird, $50,000, in full compensation for the services and expenses of the said Spencer F. Baird during his administration of the office of Commissioner of Fish and Fisheries, from February 257 1871, to the time of his death, in August, 1887. , Supposing I will not say a munificent but a just employer, finding that his salaries had been punctually paid in the lifetime of his employee, _ had found in the calculation of opportunities of future provision for those dependent on him that he had been cut off, and it had been the habit to give extraordinary value to this employer’s administration in his affairs, could he not without seeming to defraud any rightful claims upon him say, ‘‘I will now reckon up what is proper to be paid, not as a gift, not as a gratuity, not as a bounty, but in my own calculation of what I will have measured as a just satisfaction of these long enumerated and uncompensated services ?” It is thus, then, Mr. President, that we are absolutely free from any pretension that we have not the power under the Constitution of estimating services to the public welfare and fixing their compensation. I must think, then, there is nothing left for us but to say, ‘‘As this was not done in advance and has passed long without recognition as needing compensation, it should be done now.” It is too late, they say, for us, because there is no such relation of stipulation and obligation as to permit us to measure and compensate as we now see to be just. Mr. Cuttom. Mr. President, I do not believe there is any Senator on this floor who appreciates more highly the very distinguished work of Professor Baird than Ido. It so happened, by the favor of the Presiding Officer of the Senate, that I was thrown with him in con- nection with the administration of the affairs of the Smithsonian Institute, and thereby came to know more of his life and services than 1078 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. perhaps I should have been able to learn otherwise. Iam ready to admit that when we come to attempt to make an estimate of what Professor Baird’s services to the world, and to this country especially, have been we can not do so in dollars and cents. When I offered the amendment a few minutes ago to reduce the appropriation from $50,000 to $25,000 I did it feeling that we should probably fail to do anything toward recognizing that great service, and for Mrs. Baird and the daughter, unless a smaller amount should be agreed upon than that which was proposed to be inserted in the bill- by the Committee on Appropriations. Hence it was that I offered the amendment. I am ready to say now that so far as I am personally concerned I shall have no hesitation in voting for $50,000. I believe that we have the power, in the first place, to do whatever in the judgment of the Congress of the United States is right to be done in the way of voting money to the widow and family of the late Professor Baird. I have no compunctions or doubts in my mind upon that question. But I am desirous that some appropriation shall be retained in the bill for the family of Professor Baird. It was with the feeling that there was doubt whether the provision as it was reported by the committee could be retained that I moved the amendment I did. I am willing now, tf it is permitted by the Senate, to withdraw the amendment which I offered, and allow a vote to be taken upon the original amount before any amendment is offered, unless some other Senator shall see proper to offer one. Mr. Reacan. I-wish the Senator would not eee the amend- ment, for I do not want to make the point of order, and I can not con- sent to an appropriation of $50,000. Mr. Cuttom. The Senator from Texas indicated that he desired to make a point of order. Iam not prepared to say whether the Presi- dent of the Senate would sustain the point of order. It was on account of the suggestion made by the Senator from Texas, as well as the suggestion indicated by him that he would not make the point of order if a smaller amount was proposed, that I came to the conclusion that it was best, all things considered, to move, as I did, to amend the amendment reported by the committee. As it is probable that some other Senator will renew it if I should withdraw it, it may be as well that I should let it stand and let the Senate vote on it. I do not, therefore, withdraw my amendment. ft Mr. H. L. Dawes. Mr. President, there is one view of the case which I feel ought not to be lost sight of by the Senate when they come to vote upon this question. The connection of Professor Baird with this matter dates earlier than the statute of 1871. Before there was any such office or any duties imposed upon anyone with reference to this matter Professor Baird volunteered his services and came, as the Senator from Ken- FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1079 tucky knows, to the Committee on Appropriations of the House and stated to them what his ideas were and what he thought was a possi- bility. He stated that if the Committee on Appropriations of the House would give him $5,000 he would devote his time without cost to the Government in experimenting to such’an extent as to demon- strate the possibility of accomplishing something of value to the people of this country in the line of producing food-fish, and $5,000.two years before the date of the law, when there was no law regulating it, was appropriated for that purpose. When Professor Baird had demonstrated freely to his own satisfac- tion and everybody else’s what he could do, he drew the statute, and that it might not appear that he was seeking a place of gain or profit to himself, but that it was solely in the interest of the poor people of this country, he said: ‘‘I do not ask anything for this work; I am willing to devote all the time I have left from my duties at the Smith- sonian Institution to the work.” Then the law was adopted. He created an institution; he created the: law governing it; and under it from $5,000 a year we have imposed upon the officer created by that law the disbursement of more than $100,000 a year. From one single station for hatching fish close by him here at the Smith- ’ sonian Institution he has been required by appropriations from time -to time and by the duties of an office voluntarily taken upon him to establish stations all over the country, first in the Lakes, then on the Pacific coast, down on the shores of Massachusetts and Maine, and down on the Southern waters. Everywhere where it was possible to make the experiment useful and demonstrate its possibility, the serv- ices of Professor Baird were required in the discharge of duties that he.never could possibly have pinion Gite when he tendered his services. Mr. Harris. Will the esultia from Massachusetts allow me? I believe the Senator from Massachusetts has been in one or the other of the Houses of Congress for the last eighteen or twenty years. If the Senator from Massachusetts regarded this service as meriting a higher degree of compensation than was being ‘allowed and paid to that very distinguished and able official or person, whichever he may have been, why did not the Senator see that he was paid to the extent that his services merited ? : Mr. Dawes. That is not an inquiry, it seems to me, becoming the Senator from Tennessee to make of me. I am showing what Professor Baird voluntarily took upon himself, and what we in addi- tion, and beyond any possibility of a conception on his part, put upon him, and that without murmur or complaint or reference to the fact that the statute required it should be done for nothing, he willingly took the new burdens we imposed upon him until the end, seventeen years after it had grown up into an institution that no man could be 1080 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. procured to discharge the duties of for any such sum as we found it necessary after he died to affix to an office created to do just what he had been doing voluntarily, without requirement from anybody, for nothing. When he died the President found it impossible to procure any man under the description here from among the civil officers of the Government to discharge these duties. He tried the experiment of a distinguished officer of the Treasury Department, and he declined. He tried others, and they would not undertake the work. -It was found necessary to seek an employee of the Smithsonian Institution to discharge these duties until an act could be passed by Congress creating an office with a salary of $5,000 a year to do that which Professor Baird had done for nothing. Now, because of the suggestion that it is quite vad our province and our duty to compensate for the services of this office, is raised this queer constitutional question. As has been so Suncililys said by my colleague and the Senator from New York, we have been doing it daily. It occurs to me that we at one time took out of the Treasury a large sum and paid it to Professor Morton for the value, not only to the United States, but to mankind, of a discovery which he had made. Every day ina smaller way it is done. I believe in the legislative, executive, and judicial appropriation bill just passed there was a small — appropriation which involved all this. A clerk in the Interior Depart-. ment, a valuable clerk there, was sent by the Interior Department upon responsible duties in the far West, and there was no law by which he could draw anything but his meager salary in the Interior Department. Without a word from anybody there was put into the legislative appropriation bill what the committee thought was a proper and a fair additional compensation to him for the increased duties and burdens imposed upon him. He had to disburse about $15,000. Professor Baird had to disburse and become personally responsible for $100,000 year after year for many years. Yet we can not find it in our power or in our disposition, one or the other, to recognize the value of sery- ices imposed upon a willing and enthusiastic servant of the people by - the Congress of the United States, and we are unwilling to make fair and decent compensation to his representatives. Mr. Spooner. I offer two amendments to the pending bill and move that they be referred to the Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds. The motion was agreed to. Mr. A. P. Gorman. Mr. President, I should very much prefer that no case of this kind should come up for consideration, and except for the extraordinary circumstances surrounding it I would not be -in favor of making an appropriation of this character. But unfortu- nately, and I think it is unfortunate, the parsimony of Congress in- FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1081 providing proper compensation for the valuable officers of this Govy- ernment isalmost acrime. There has not been a session, I think, since I have had the honor of a seat upon this floor when some case has not been presented where such injustice has been done the individual that’ provision was made for extra compensation for some officer of the Government. There is no case that has ever been brought to my attention where the equities were so strong as in this case. As has been well said by other Senators, the services of Professor Baird excelled those of any other man in this generation. Not only did he perform the extra duties, as stated by the Senators from Massachusetts and New York, but I have the very best reason for believing that his own private property, the use of his own dwelling, was freely given to the Govy- ernment in order that the great work he had in hand might go on. In this very bill, and inevery appropriation bill, I think, since 1 have been a member of the Senate, you have made provision for your ofli- cers who have performed not half the duty, to my best belief, and I say this with a full knowledge of the careful consideration which the chairman of the Committee on Appropriations gives to every item of this character. If there is any criticism on him and the members of the committee it is that they are too close, too parsimonious. In the very bill under consideration we have appropriated several thousand dollars for officers of our own body, men who have performed extra- ordinary duties and who are entitled to compensation. We required two or three of the most efficient clerks that we have in this body to give their time out of office hours to make an index and compile the records of the executive sessions from 1829 to the end of the Fortieth Congress, and it would have been cruel not to have compensated them for that work. Others who have compiled indexes and papers for the Senate have been paid for it. Their compensation has not been so great in the aggregate as the amount proposed to be given in this case, but it has been equally as great, and indeed greater, when you compare the service that was rendered. Therefore, Mr. President, in the committee and here I take great pleasure in saying that in my best judgment this is a proper appro- - priation to be made, and I shall vote for it with great pleasure. Mr. J. B. Becx. Mr. President, I agreed to this appropriation in the committee very cheerfully. I did so, perhaps, because I was as familiar with the great work performed by Professor Baird from the beginning as most men. When Congress first began to investigate the questions as to the cause of the decrease of food fishes in this country it was an experiment; a small appropriation was made, as the Senator from Massachusetts [Mr. Dawes] very well said, to see what could be done. Professor Baird was an employee of the Smithsonian Institution, 1082 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. drawing from it the only salary he received, it being a scientific insti- tution, established by Mr. Smithson for the purpose of ‘diffusing knowledge among men. We knew that Professor Baird was the best man to do the work, and he was willing to help us develop it and see what could be done in that direction, and he did it cheerfully. Two years afterwards Congress passed a law largely extending his duties, labors, and responsibilities. The experiment was progressing satisfactorily; nobody could do the work but Professor Baird. Con- — gress was anxiously looking to see the development, often without making the proper appropriations to carry it on. In fact, it grew up, as many things have done, as the Signal Service grew- up, and as very many of the great institutions here have grown into great impor- tance from small beginnings, from experiments to established facts, so the Fish Commission kept on progressing until it became one of the great institutions of the country. While many leading men in both Houses were iting: whether it would be a success, Professor Baird was entirely confident that it would be, and he went on developing by his experiments that it would — be, proving it by results year by year, until it became assured. In the meantime I know, as the Senator from Massachusetts knows, for I visited his house time and again when we were working together in the House of Representatives, that Professor Baird was living in a plain house on New York avenue, plenty big enough for him and his family, for it was a small one and an unpretentious one, but he carried the clerks of the Fish Commission, our employees for whom we were bound to provide, to his own house, furnished them with workrooms for nothing, and when the work increased so that it could not be done ° there, using, as his statement and that of Senator Edmunds shows, in large part the money which belonged to his wife, inherited from her father, he built a house on Massachusetts avenue, and used the base- ment and other rooms of that building for our employees to do our work, not only charging no rent, but furnishing fuel, lights, and ~ everything needed to carry it on. Afterwards, at an expense of thou- sands of dollars, which he had no sort of need to expend on his own account or for the comfort of his family, he added to his house for the purpose of better and more effectually carrying on the work of the Fish Commission. In short, he actually spent for the Govern- ment, if only moderate rent and actual costs, without interest, is allowed, more than half the amount now proposed to be restored to his family in this bill. I need not tell Senators what Professor Baird did. They know its The country knows it. I remember his coming to the Appropriations Committee room one day, after he had proved how most of the different varieties of fish could be hatched and where they could be most advan- tageously distributed, with a new discovery, of which he was very FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1083 proud—one of the best of our food-fishes they had never before been _able to produce by artificial means. It was the Chesapeake or North Carolina rock bass. Many experiments had been failures because of not knowing exactly how to rock its cradle. He had finally had it worked out, and brought in a glass case, which he carried with great care, to the Committee on Appropriations, a lot of young rock which he was developing. The development of that fish alone artificially was worth millions to this country. So it was with other varieties—with _ the whitefish of the lakes and the salmon, the trout, and the carp, which are now circulated all over the country. All that work was developed under him. He carried on experiments along the New England coast for years to increase the supply of codfish. When he had established the commission on that coast and men went to visit the _ works, and he sought to induce gentlemen to visit them and take interest in the work, he entertained them all at his own expense when. they went there. The Government never paid a dollar of the expenses of anybody who went to the works under his charge in order to get information. Mr. President, I repeat that he spent in the rent of his house ata fair rental, in furnishing rooms to our clerks, in fuel, in lights, in entertaining men to educate them in the great public work he was doing and taking them to the different establishments of the Fish Com- mission, all of which he paid himself, more than the $50,000 which it is now proposed shall be given to his widow and daughter. Mr. Dawes. I wish the Senator from Kentucky would tell the Sen- ate what Professor Baird said on the very clause in the bill that his services should be without compensation. Mr. Brcx. The Senator from Massachusetts knows about that as well as I do. Mr. Dawes. I presume the Senator remembers that when the bill was drawn, after the two years’ experiments, and there were persons in the House of Representatives opposing it and saying that it was a job, he said that in order to have it clear before the world that he would promote no job we might put into the bill that he should not have any compensation. Mr. Brcx. Certainly; I remember that well. Mr. Dawes. He was prompted to do that in order to have the world understand that he was promoting no job. | Mr. Brcx. I meant to say in addition that when Congress did not have faith enough in the work of the Commission even to furnish room for our own clerks to work in, he took them to his own house and provided means for them. Mr. Cuttom. Will the Senator from Kentucky yield tome? In the light of the information which has been given and the disposition I see manifested on the part of the Senate to support the original 1084 ' CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. amendment reported by the Committee on Appropriations, I desire to withdraw the amendment I offered. Mr. Brcx. I am very glad of it. The sum ought to be $50,000. The PresipENtT pro tempore. The amendment of the Senator from Illinois to the amendment of the Committee on Appropriations is withdrawn. Mr. Reacan. I offer a substitute for the amendment of the Gaia mittee on Appropriations, which I ask to have read. The PrEestDENT pro tempore. The Senator from Kentucky is entitled to the floor. Does he yield to the Senator from Texas? Mr. Brecx. Certainly; I have no object or purpose except to tell what I know and give my reasons for voting as I propose to do. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The amendment proposed by the Sen- ator from Texas to the amendment of the Committee on Appropria- tions will be read. The Chief Clerk read as follows: For rent of house of the late Spencer F. Baird for the United States Fish Commis- sion, and for his services as United States Fish Commissioner from 1871 to 1886, $25,000. Mr. Beck. Mr. President, another thing I might add as an instance. The Senator from Massachusetts [Mr. Dawes] very well knows that until Professor Baird took charge of the Fish Commission work and amplified it, and spent every hour that any man could very well spend at labor, up to that time he was writing, as he had the right to do, for scientific magazines and works all over the world, and was realizing large sums of money to eke out the salary that was paid him by the Smithsonian Institution. : When he took up this work and found that its success depended on his exertions he devoted all his time to it, and all that source of income was cut off from him and his family, and he was unable to earn a dol- lar because of the immense labor he was performing in the Fish Com- mission, added to his Smithsonian work, and I doubt if he ever after- wards earned anything for himself, which he was well able to do by the use of his pen or by his scientific researches that would have brought him in large sums of money from that source. Mr. Harris. What was his salary ? Mr. Brcx. Six thousand dollars. He has never drawn a dollar from the United States—not a penny—in all these years, and he could , have made $6,000 more a year with his ability by the use of his pen otherwise than in the employment of the Smithsonian Institution and not lost an hour nor a’ minute from the work of the Smithsonian: but for the work he was doing for us. Mr. James Z. Grorcr. Can the Senator state about the condition of his family at present? ‘ FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1085 Mr. Brox. I am not accurately informed as to the circumstances of his family, but I understand from the Senator from Vermont [Mr. Edmunds] that they have an income of about $1,200 or $1,500 a year. _ I think that is the statement of Senator Edmunds, but I do not know about it personally. ' Mr. Harris. If I understand the Senator from Kentucky, the Sen- ator from Maryland, the Senator from Massachusetts, and the Senator from New York, they all claim and make statements that amount to the establishment of a debt against the Government for rent and the services of Professor Baird. Now, if the Government owes to the estate of Professor Baird $1 or.$50,000 or $100,000, it ought to be paid. No one’appreciates the distinguished services of that very distinguished and eminent man more than I; but the thing that I pro- tested against and now protest against is levying and collecting taxes and donating the money to the estate of Professor Baird or any other human being; and I simply desired to know if I understood the Sen- ator from Kentucky and other Senators correctly. Whatever we owe we ought to pay, and nobody is more ready to pay than I am, but I am not here to make donations. Mr. Brecx. Mr. President, I do not believe that the estate of Pro- fessor Baird has any claim that it could go into court and collect by law, but I believe that we morally and equitably owe every dollar of this money to Professor Baird and his family just as much as any debt that we owe for labor honestly done and for accommodations for our employees in our service fairly furnished. I consider it as just an obligation as was ever paid out of the Treasury. I do not care about stating what we have done in many other regards, what we have given to generals and their widows and their families, for I do not desire to make any contrasts of that sort; but I repeat that, while I do not believe the estate could collect it in the Court of Claims, it is an honest debt, and I shall vote for it cheerfully, and I believe my people will cheerfully consent to be taxed to pay it, because I insist that we owe this debt morally and equitably, if not legally, as much so as any debt ever due by the Government. The very fact that we are not forced to pay it adds, I think, to the reputation of the United States for doing justice when the facts are laid before Congress. I remember the pride we all took in the great expositions that were held abroad, when Professor Baird arranged all our exhibits to be sent, making a contrast between the progress made by our people and the people of other nations. Even the fishermen of Sweden and Norway, who were thought to be ahead of all the world, were astonished at the development we had made in that direction. Professor Langley wrote me a letter, which I filed with the committee, in which he said: I dare not attempt to estimate the practical value of the work of the Commission to the country, but can not doubt that it amounts to very many millions of dollars. 1086 . CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. I presume you are familiar with Mr. Goode’s ‘‘ Review of what has been accom- plished by the Fish Commission in fish-culture and in the investigation of American — fisheries,’’ but I venture to send herewith a copy of this pamphlet and to direct your special attention to pages 26 to 34, in which are quoted numerous commenda- tions of the Fish Commission from the principal authorities of Great Britain, Nor- way, Holland, Germany, Belgium, France, and other European nations. Professor Huxley, in an address at the London Fisheries Exhibition, said that he did not think ‘‘that any nation at the*present time had comprehended the question of dealing with fish in so thorough, excellent, and scientific a spirit as that of the United States.” Until Professor Baird took hold of it we had done nothing worth | mentioning in that direction; we did not even know our own resources; we had taken no steps to develop.them, and yet in a few years the energetic, intelligent action of this single man, oné of the few scien- tific men I ever saw who could do all he talked about, who knew how — to show others how to do it, who, knew how to pull off his coat and do it himself, until he impressed the world with his great efficieney and the greatness of this people in a great enterprise that all the world was struggling to carry on. Professor Langley goes on to say: While M. Rayeret-Wattel, the principal French authority on this subject, states that ‘‘to this day pisciculture has nowhere produced results which can be compared with those obtained in the United States,’’ no one can question that the peculiar excellence of the work of our Government has been directly or indirectly due to the presence of Professor Baird at the head of the commission. He had no rivals, and dur- ing his administration no word of criticism was ever uttered by competent persons. All this, it may well be remembered, was accomplished while filling effectively the distinct duties of an officer of the Smithsonian Institution, for which alone he was paid. And it may be added that during the first half of his term of service as Com- missioner, and while he was assistant secretary of the Smithsonian, his entire salary was less than that received by several of his assistants during the last few years. In this same letter he shows how Professor Henry was employed as a member of the Light-House Board, and how Congress recognized the value of the work done by him. In relation to that he says: In reference to the possible precedent of the action of Congress in the case of the late Professor Henry, I would state that a communication from the Secretary of the Treasury was received by the House of Representatives June 4, 1878, and by the Sen- ate June 5, 1878, recommending an appropriation of $500 for each year during which the late Professor Henry was employed as a member of the Light-House Board,. for the benefit of his family. On June 20, 1878, an act was passed ‘‘to pay to the legal representatives of the late Joseph Henry, for services rendered by him as member and president of the Light-House Board, $11,000.’’ (Second session Forty-fifth Con- gress, page 214.) These payments were made, and purposely made, in recognition of the eminent services of that distinguished gentleman. Congress was under no legal obligation, if you please, to Professor Henry, but for the benefit he had done the country, which was well known, Congress paid for his services as a debt, not a legal but a moral and equitable - FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1087 one, and $11,000 was therefore given, or paid—call it what you like— to Professor Henry, together with $500 a year while he was a member of the Light-House Board. 1 have not time to state even half of what I know in regard to the great services rendered to the people of the - United States by Professor Baird, though it would perhaps be proper todoso. From my knowledge of him and his work I could tell of hundreds of things of immense benefit to the country which he did that no amount of money can repay. He made a practical survey of the bottom of the ocean from the' coast of New England to the bank of the Gulf Stream. He took great interest in establishing many of the scientific things, such as the elec- tric sounding bell, or whatever it is called. Whatever he did he threw open for the benefit of the world. I never heard of his securing a patent for anything; and I have no more doubt than that I am standing on this floor that but for his determination to make this great work a success, but for the overwork he did, he would have been a living man to-day. I believe he killed himself by overwork and overzeal in the service of the United States, and left his wife and daughter dependent, measurably at least, instead of being supported by him in affluence as they would have been, for his own wants were few and his tastes sim- ple, but for the fact that he was the victim of overwork in the public interest. That adds very largely, in my mind, to our obligation, and that is one of the reasons why I propose to vote for the full amount asked for in this amendment. Mr. Berry. Mr. President, I wish to submit a few remarks in response to those made by the Senator from Kentucky [Mr. Beck]. The Senator has raised the point that this is not a donation, but that it is a private claim against the Government of the United States. The Senator from Kentucky is a member of the Committee on Appro- priations. That committee have made a report, and they have adopted as their report the statement made by the Senator from Vermont [Mr. Edmunds] as to the character of this claim, and I wish to read to the ‘Senate the opinion of the Senator from Vermont, which the committee of which the Senator from Kentucky is a member have adopted and made to the Senate. | In response to the question by the chairman of the committee, ‘‘ You want to have whatever we do put on this bill,” Mr. Edmunds said: Yes; that is exactly what I want, and it is perfectly suitable and proper, if it is right to do it at all, because it is not a private claim, but is a miscellaneous donation that under the circumstances it is proper for Congress to make, if you think so. Now, Mr. President, if this is a claim for house rent, and if it is a claim for salary which can be enforced against the Government of the United States, the Senator from Kentucky well knows that it has no place upon this general appropriation bill: The rule read by the Sen- ator from Texas [Mr. Reagan] absolutely prohibits the attaching of 1088 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. any private claim to a general appropriation bill. No claim that this was a legal obligation upon the part of the Government or that it was © a debt was ever made until it came here to-day; and now, when the ~ committee find that it can not be sustained as a donation, they shift the premises and say that it is a private claim for services rendered and house rent furnished. If we owe to Professor Baird anything for house rent, then I agree with the Senator from Tennessee [Mr. Har- ris] that we should pay it, and I will cheerfully vote for it; but, Mr. President, when it comes to say that the Congress of the United States, as was said by the Senator from Florida [Mr. Call], can take from the Treasury of the United States $50,000, or any other sum of money, and donate it to any person whom a majority of members may think most worthy, then I say that is a proposition to which I can not and will not yield my consent. This is money collected from the people by taxation; it is collected for public purposes, and, however pleasant it may be to donate money to individuals, I conceive that we have no right to donate other peo-_ ple’s money, however sympathetic and generous we may feel. If, however, it is a claim, let it come in the regular way; let it be proved how much the house rent was, and I shall be ready to vote for it, as I will vote for the payment of any other debt that the Government owes. But the Senator from Kentucky appeals to our sympathies by saying that this lady’s income is only $1,200 or $1,500 a year, and therefore | the Government of the United States should add to it, although it was expressly provided in the law under which Professor Baird served that he should not receive any additional compensation to the $6,000 he received as Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. There are widows all over this land of ours whose income is not more than $125 a year—widows of men, too, who rendered service to the Government and offered all they had and gave their lives to the country—who are receiving certainly not more than $250 a year. If we are going into the private donation business; if we are going to take the people’s money and give it to whomsoever we please; if that be true, it simply comes down to a question as to what persons can secure the good will of the greatest number of Senators and mem- bers of Congress in order to take not only the money now in the Treasury of the United States, but all that can be placed there under any system of taxation that can be devised. The Senator from Vermont has said that it was a donation, not a’ ~ private claim; and if it be not a donation it has no place upon this bill. I for one will not vote for the $50,000, nor will I vote for the $25,000 in the amendment offered by the Senator from Texas. If we have a right to donate one dollar, then the right is unlimited, and we will soon find that the demands will be such that our generosity will only be limited by the capacity of the people to pay taxes. FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1089 Mr. Reaaan. Mr. President, I desire to say a few words in refer- ence to the amendment which I have presented; but before I do that I wish to state that in the remarks I made at the opening of this dis- cussion I referred to the question as to whether we could pay this money to Professor Baird’s widow on account of his having been an officer of the Government and having received compensation for another service. . I have thought more of that. While he was appointed Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution under authority of an act of Congress, he received his compensation from the fund donated by Mr. Smithson for that Institution, and I take it that it would be held to be in the nature of any other corporation that might be created under an act of Con- gress and the employees of which were paid by the corporation and not by the Government, and would not, on that account, give rise to the question as to whether he could be compensated for his services as Fish Commissioner, in view of the fact that he had received this com- pensation as Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. So I dismiss that branch of the subject. As stated by the Senator from Arkansas [Mr. Berry], the Senator from Vermont [Mr. Edmunds] before the Committee on Appropria- tions suggested that this was in the nature of a miscellaneous donation, and that idea seems to have been assented to, perhaps without a very full consideration of the subject, by the chairman of the Committee on Appropriations. If it is a donation simply, I do not see how we have a right to appropriate money as a donation. The Senator from Arkansas will see clearly the distinction between the amendment which I have presented and the clause reported by the committee. Let the Secretary read the amendment which I have presented. The Presiding Officer (Mr. Coartes F. Manperson in the chair). The Secretary will report the amendment. The Curer CLERK. In lieu of the proposed donnie it is now proposed to insert: For the rent of the house of the late Spencer F. Baird for the use of the United States Fish Commission, and for his services as United States Fish Commissioner from 1871 to 1886, $25,000. Mr. Reacan. That places the compensation on the ground that it had been earned. It has been stated by all those who are familiar with the transactions of Professor Baird that he furnished rooms in his house and enlarged his house for the purpose of furnishing rooms for the use of the Fish Commission, for which he was never compensated by the Government, and he also rendered very important services as Fish Commissioner for which he was not compensated. I have no objection, as I stated in the outset, to a proper and rea- sonable compensation for the services and the use of the property of Professor Baird. I do object to the $50,000 which it is proposed to H. Doc. 732-69 1090 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. give; and when I do that I call attention to the fact which I presented before—that during the last nine years and three months of his service as Fish Commissioner he received $55,500 as his compensation as Sec- retary of the Smithsonian Institution. ' Now, then, receiving this large amount, though it did not come from the Government, he was acting under the authority of an act of Con- gress, and at least it shows that he was not under the necessity of being entirely compensated and it shows how he could consent to perform the important services he performed for the Government without compensation. We manage here, whenever a claim of somebody is presented, to work up a great deal of sympathy and to value that sympathy by the amount we can appropriate out of the Federal Treasury. Has it occurred to Senators that $50,000 would give $100 apiece to five hundred poor families and make them feel happy? Is there no sympathy for those five hundred poor families that work from the rising to the setting of the sun, toiling to make a living? Have we forgotten here the mil- lions of dollars we are collecting as taxes for the purpose of furnish- ing the funds we appropriate for the use of the Government and for the use of private persons, to a large extent? I know, sir, and I am sorry to know it, that he who speaks as I now © speak is, if not regarded as a crank, regarded as a very impracticable man in the Senate of the United States; but I can not help it. My way of looking at it is that I do not represent those who seek to plun- der the Treasury of the United States, but I represent those who pay the taxes which support the Government and which ought to be employed in the legitimate support of the Government and the fulfill- ing of the obligations of the Government; and I desire to balance my _ sympathies between the claimants and the people who toil for the money that they obtain, and I expressed the other day the hope— Mr. Grorer. Will the Senator allow me to ask him a question? Mr. ReaGan. Certainly. Mr. Grorer. What proportion of the people of Texas do not have - $1,200 per annum income from property, leaving out their own indi- vidual exertions Mr. Reagan. I do not suppose there is one in a hundred who has an income of $1,200. I doubt if there is one in-a thousand. Mr. Groreer. Independent of their own individual exertions 4 Mr. Reacan. Independently of their own exertions. Mr. President, the question which the Senator from Mississippi asks causes me to look back to the people whom I in part represent upon this floor and the condition of the people of other States represented upon this floor, where there are thousands and tens of thousands of toilers that.can not make enough by hard labor under the existing condition of things to support their families in decency, and to call attention to the fact that FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1091 the farmers of this country, once an independent and a happy class, are year by year becoming impoverished, year by year encumbering their little farms by mortgages, year by year unable to meet their lia- bilities, and it will not be long, under the existing condition of things, ‘till their homes will be swept from under them and they will become beggars or tramps. ' - Mr. Buarr. Will the Senator allow me to ask him a question 4 Mr. Reagan. I will. Mr. Buarr. Does the Senator, in this description of the farmers, mean to be understood as stating that it is the condition of the farm- ing population of Texas? Mr. Reaaan. I mean to say that that is the condition of the farm- ing population throughout the United States. _ Mr. Buarr. Of course, then, in Texas. Mr. Reagan. I mean to say that by class legislation and by the transfer of the wealth of this country by law from the many to the few farming has become a degraded occupation, and that the young men of this country will no longer pursue the occupation of farming if they can get into the humblest employment in towns that does not involve agricultural labor. That is what I mean to say; and if the Senator will go among the people in the farming States he can every day of his life verify the truth of what Iam saying. It is that class, and it is a class once happy, once loving and respecting their Govern- ment, but who are now discontented and murmuring and making organ- izations such as Grangers’ alliances, Union Labor parties, Knights of Labor, making up organizations to protect themselves against the aggressions of the money power and those who are pressing class leg- islation. That is the kind of people to whom I am referring. The policy of Congress ought not to be to add to the discontent of the people, but it ought to pursue a course which shall make them feel that they have the protection of the Government in common with all others, and that no others are being given advantages by law of which they are deprived. They ought to be allowed to learn that this Gov- ernment is not to be run in the interest of millionaires, in the interest of aggregated capital, either individual or corporate, in the interest of those who are piling up their hundreds of millions while discontent pervades the whole working masses of this country, while want and wretchedness are spreading their dark wings over the toiling people of this country. We may hide it from ourselves, but we can not hide it from them. We may think men are ignorant and that they do not know what we are doing, but if we think so we are mistaken. They know what Congress is doing; they know the acts of extravagance we are guilty of; they know whether we act so as to promote the general welfare or whether we act so as to promote the interests of particular individuals at the expense of the great mass of the people. rosz- - CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Mr. Groree. Will the Senator allow me to interrupt him? Mr. Reagan. Certainly. Mr. Grorer. The modern way of promoting the general welfare, I believe, is to take the money from the people at large and give it to a few. Mr. Reacan. That is the effect of the Tecan which has prevailed for a great many years past. Mr. Buarr. Will the Senator allow me to ask him a question? Mr. Reaaan. Certainly. Mr. Buarr. When a little while ago it was proposed to take $79,000,000 and spread it among the poor people of this country and the children of this country, was that an effort to take the money of the many and give it to a few? Mr. Reacan. ‘‘Still harping on my daughter.” Mr. Buarr. And will the Senator bear in mind his own speeches about the enormous wealth and growing prosperity of the people of Texas which he made upon the education bill? Mr. Reagan. Mr. President, I made no statements about the enor- mous wealth of the people of Texas. The idea of making the people mendicants is the thing that I am resisting. The idea that the whole _ American people shall be made beggars from the Federal Treasury, debased and deprived of their manhood and patriotism, is a thing that Iam resisting. That educational bill simply made States come hat in hand to a school commissioner to make reports and to ask privileges. It took away from the States and from the people the feeling of man- hood and of independence by which they propose to educate their own children. But I do not propose to go into the educational bill. Mr. Buarr. I was going to suggest to the Senator that I would turn him over to the Senator from Mississippi [Mr. George] so far as that part of it is concerned. Mr. Reacan. We will settle that in our own way. I think perhaps the Senator from New Hampshire will learn something before that bill comes up again. Mr. Buarr. I hope the people BE Texas will, and there _ be somebody here to advocate it. Mr. Reacan. Mr. President, in submitting the amendment which I presented I had two objects. One was to reduce the amount of this appropriation, and the other to place it upon a basis upon which we can justify our action; that is, as compensation for rent and services. If that is not done—of course I can not speak or think for other Sena- tors—I do not see where the authority is to come from to makea ‘* miscellaneous donation.” That is what it was called before the com- mittee, and what I understand it is called by the committee here in the Senate—a ‘‘ miscellaneous donation.” I agree with the Senator from Tennessee [Mr. Harris] that we have FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 10938 no power to make miscellaneous donations of $50,000, nor of 50 cents. We have the right, I think, to compensate for services where we believe those services have been rendered and have been valuable. I agree with Senators that Professor Baird in his lifetime and his family since his death could not be paid in dollars and cents for the services he rendered his country. While I believe that, I do not wish to excite popular indignation by giving an unreasonable amount in view of the fact that in the last nine years and three months of his service he was the recipient of $55,500. This $50,000 which we propose in our sympathy to give to this partic- ular lady, as worthy of it as any other lady no doubt, would make happy five hundred families of poor people if it could be given to them in hundred-dollar sums; and I have thought always, if this Govern- ment is to be converted simply into a charitable, eleemosynary institu- tion, that we ought to exercise good judgment and Christian charity in selecting the objects of our charity, and we ought to begin with the poor and unfortunate. Mr. President, I hope that my amendment will be adopted in lieu of the original proposition of the Committee on Appropriations. Mr. Stewart. I am constrained to say a word. I deprecate as much as the Senator from Texas any laws that have a tendency to take the money from the masses and give it to the few, and I have expressed myself pretty distinctly on that subject on various occasions during the present session; but I think that his speech was particularly ill- timed as applied to the present case. There is no man who has lived in this country who has done as much as Professor Baird for the poor, for the laboring men. I have traveled over a large portion of the United States, and at almost every railroad station now you will find a kind of fish that is not common to that sec- tion, that has been cultivated by reason of developing this industry by Professor Baird. Away up in Oregon, on Puget Sound, in San Fran- cisco, we have as fine shad as you have anywhere, and all over the country the poor people, who avail themselves of this food as much as any other, have had it brought home to their doors. ‘There has been more food placed within the reach of the poor by this man’s exertion ‘than by those of any other man. He has distributed wealth and food among the masses, and, by the statement of the Senator from Kentucky and other Senators who are familiar with what he did, we are only giving to his family a reasonable compensation, a small compensation, for this great service he rendered, and there is no poor man who has had fish brought home to him who will complain of the compensation that is given to Professor Baird for this great good. So I do not think the speech of the Senator from Texas applies to this case. He may get sundry cases to which it does apply, but it does not apply here. This is the case of a man who has fed the poor 1094 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. during his lifetime and has provided means for feeding them during the ages, bringing a kind of food that is cheap to their doors. There is hardly a stream of any importance in America that is not now stocked with fish, and you find it on the tables of the poor and the rich everywhere. He has provided a great industry, more important than any other man has done in the United States, and by his sacrifice, according to the testimony here. I repeat, he gave up his own house to it, gave up everything, and left his family poor. ' I think the poor will sympathize with them and will be willing to reward any man who will do a tenth part of this. The masses of the people, I say, would vote ten times this amount to any man who will confer a tenth of this benefit on them. And Iam glad that the peo- ple do watch what is being done here. I want them to watch this act. I want the people to know that Congress has been just in this respect and has appreciated the great blessing that has been conferred upon them by the efforts and the genius of this man. Mr. Cau. I do not propose to detain the Senate, but I am not content to give my vote on this amendment without one or two statements. The Senator from Arkansas [Mr. Berry] said that the Senator from Florida had stated that we had the power to make a donation of any amount that we pleased. 1 did make that remark to the Senator from Tennessee [Mr. Harris]. I did not, however, say that we could right- fully exercise the power to make a gift without some object, some sound public policy, to sustain it. , I apprehend there is not a Senator on this floor who does not acknowledge that Congress has the power. Whether it is rightfully exercised or not is another question. But who is to prevent? If the two Houses of Congress make the appropriation the money must be paid. Is not that power, I ask the Senator from Arkansas, whether | it is rightfully exercised or not, if the Constitution of the United States has not referred it to the sovereign judgment of Senators who represent the States, and the people’s Representatives, not for one Congress, but for every recurring Congress, to decide when and how and for what purpose the money in the Treasury shall be appropriated ? To Congress alone, with the President, is committed the power and duty of deciding whether or not an appropriation of money is within the limitations of the Constitution. Now, I say that this Government can make no appropriation of money which is not a gift or grant. It does-not operate by contract. “Who ever heard of the Government saying you shall or shall not do this unless you agree to it? Why, look at your Constitution here. Congress shall have power to do this, Congress shall have power to do the other—not by consent. What is power? Power is mandatory. It commands; and when Congress says ‘‘Be it enacted that so much = FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1095 money shall be paid as the salary of an office” it does not say it shall be paid if the incumbent agrees it shall be done. It does not say that certain public functions or duties shall be per- formed if some particular person shall contract or agree to perform them, and that the Government then agrees to pay him so much; but it declares that the duties or function shall be performed and that a certain sum of money shall be paid. It punishes the failure to obey this command and requires in all cases obedience, and not consent. It says if you accept of this office we command that you perform these duties attached to it; we command that a certain designated offi- cer shall pay this money. ‘There is no place.for contracts in the oper- ations of government, and it is so recognized everywhere. It is soy- ereign power, not consent, not agreement, but the exercise of attributes. Now, the Senator from Tennessee says if we owe a debt we must pay it. The Government owes no debts in the sense in which he uses the word; that is, arising from contract, from agreement. Bonds are simple declarations that the Government of the United States will pay so and so; and the fact that all appropriations of money must be made by or subject to the consent of each succeeding Congress every two years forbids the idea or obligation of a contract and makes the con- tinuance a reenactment of an appropriation dependent on the public faith and the sound policy of maintaining it. Mr. Harris. Is it not a contract? Mr. Cau. No; not a contract in the sense that it arises from con- sent and agreement. A debt is an obligation. It may be by contract, it may be by virtue of some other consideration ex debito justitie, as the obligation of justice, the result of law; but it is not a mere mat- ter of agreement between two persons, and does not derive its obliga- tion from an agreement between the Government and a person, but from the higher idea that the public faith is by law pledged or com- mended to be used for some public purpose. The Government owes what? The Government owes protection and the proper exercise of the powers conferred upon it. It owes the cre- ation of a sound policy in the exercise of those attributes of power which, by the Constitution, are vested in it. The Government is the people, all the people, not a part, requiring with power, not consent, policies, public policies, affecting the whole people and generations of people, to be declared and carried into effect, and each specific act required to be done or forbidden to be done must be in the line of and a part of some public policy. Now, the Senator from Texas [Mr. Reagan] undertakes to repre- sent the people, and he does not allow any other Senator who does not agree with him to do so. He asks why not give this money, $100 apiece, to so many people? Why does not the Senator from Texas 1096 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. give his salary, so much money, $100 apiece, to the people to do this charity? He.will say because the Government commands it to be paid to him, and for what? For services rendered. Suppose Profes- sor Baird has rendered greater service than he or I or any other Sen- ator; suppose he has rendered to these poor people in this whole country, to each one of the poor people for generations, services a thousand times greater than the Senator or I or all other Senators or members of Congress, and he rises here to say, ‘‘I will take the $5,000; I will not give it to the people, but I will not compensate the man who rendered the far greater service. Jam the friend of the poor; I rep- resent them. I represent the oppressed, the farmer; but I will keep my $5,000; I will vote this to myself, but I will not vote anything to the man who has fed all these starving millions. This is no debt of the people, because he did not make a contract with the people to do it. He has done a service which I have not done, but I have a right to the money, service or no service, because it is a contract.” Mr. Harris. Iam tempted to ask the Senator from Florida, if he will allow me—and yet I know how he will answer before I oe the question, for he utterly repudiates the idea of contract between the Government and employees, in which I totally disagree with him—but I want to ask him this question: Does he hold that he as a Senator, that a majority of the Senate and a majority of the House of Rep- resentatives can levy, collect and appropriate the money to any charitable object that they may think charitable and deserving as a donation ? Mr. Cau. I will ask the Senator to answer me this question-—— Mr. Harris. I would rather you would answer my question, and then I will answer any question you please to propound to me. Mr. Cauxi. But if the Senator will answer my question he will refute his own statement and answer his own question himself. I ask him if it is true or untrue that an act passed by a majority of this body and by a majority of the other House of Congress and signed by the President appropriating money to any object whatever is the law of this land or is it not, and are or are not all persons and powers required to obey it? Mr. Harris. Whether the act be within the limits of constitutional delegated power or not, I suppose it would get the money out of the Treasury, and I suppose if a thief were to break into the Treasury and get the money out he would have the money all the same. But I ask the Senator from Florida a question that involves his construction of the constitutional powers of Congress and not what may have been done or what possibly may be done in the future. Mr. Cau. The rightful exercise of power and power itself are dif- ferent things. Every use of money by Government is a grant, and FIFTIETH CONGRESS; 1887-1889. 1097 the Senator’s statement is no answer to the argument. The use of public money may or may not be a charity. Mr. Harris. The Senator dodges the question I asked. Mr. Cau. The Senator from Tennessee dodges the conclusion, but Ido not. When the Senator from Tennessee says that an act of Con- gress passed by a majority of each of the two Houses and approved by the President is the same as a thief breaking into the Treasury and taking the money out, then there is no argument about it. In the one case the people’s representatives, appointed by the Con- stitution to decide what is a proper use of the public money, decide and perform the constitutional duty assigned to them, and not to the Senator from Tennessee, and he says this, if it does not agree with his opinion, is very absurd. Mr. Grorer. Mr. President, right here I want to put on record an extract from an old-fashioned and now almost forgotten paper. It is the eighth section of the first article of the Constitution of the United States: The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States. Mr. Catu. The Senator from Tennessee and all others who maintain his argument do not allow the words ‘‘ Congress of the United States ” to have any meaning. Now, Mr. President, this is a matter of argument, and it has been argued a hundred times; but every time Congress exercises this power, if it does not suit a Senator’s fancy, like the Senator from Tennessee or the Senator from Texas, this same question is raised. I remember some years ago the Senator from Tennessee thought that charity and the general welfare required an ice ship to be built to freeze out the yellow fever that had been decimating and destroying Memphis, and if I recollect aright there was some amount, over a hundred thousand dollars, I think, for this charity donated, granted, appropriated out of the Treasury of the United States. As to the money that Congress appropriates in the forms of the Constitution, the argument is that the Constitution is an assemblage of powers—not of ideas, but of powers. That is an instance, and the Senator’s vote can not dodge, but answers his question. It is true there are declaratory phrases in the Constitution which say the powers ought to be exercised so and so, but the power is distinct from the direction; the power is given to the two Houses, to the people through their representatives. Mr. President, that is what I said, and I say the fathers who made the Constitution, when they gave to the people the power to send Rep- resentatives here every two years and the people as States to send them 1098 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. to this body every six years, knew what they were doing, knew that responsibility to them was the sole preservation of the Government. But, Mr. President, whence come these ideas of the Senator from Texas? They have no foundation in reason; they are not in behalf of the people. They are oppressive of the people. They are destructive of these starving millions, for whom the inventions of science and the devices of philanthropists discovered food products; and wise public policies, instead of starving, give life and energy and comfort. The Senator’s - ideas, however well intended, are in this instance the support of monopoly and oppression to the great mass of the people. Put the iron hand of power on the friends of the poor, like Professor Baird, refuse them all compensation, and say the rich alone shall labor for the people, and what will become of us? The policies of the Senator from Texas would destroy the inventions and the virtue of the age, would destroy philanthropy, would punish devotion to the toiling mil- lions, instead of encouraging those who, in the the providence of the Almighty, are permitted to be great benefactors. It is a wise public policy that gives life to these things, and not tho pitiful sum of a hun- dred dollars here and there. Mr. President, that is my reply. The people want knowledge and comfort. They want philanthropists. They want the benefaction of wise public policies which reach to every poor man’s cabin and clothe his naked children and feed the starving millions. And among these benefactors Professor Baird was first and foremost in furnishing food to the millions that are to come here. Let us, in the people’s name and with the people’s money, reward him who gave his money, his labor, his life, with true devotion to the people—of this and future generations—and let us not, in the interest of monopoly and tyranny, refuse to reward devotion to the people—on the ground of injury to the people to reward a man for his devotion to them. Mr. Axuison. Mr. President, I think we have now reached a point where we understand this matter, and I am willing to go as far as I can in aid of my friend from Texas, so as to put this upon the right ground. Therefore I will move, in line 1, page 50, after the word ‘‘ Fisheries,” to insert ‘‘including rent of rooms for the use of said commission.” Although I think I could make a long speech on this amendment, I will not occupy time. If we can have a vote upon it and then upon the main amendment, I shall gratify Senators by moving an adjourn- ment. The Presiding Officer (Mr. Manprrson in the chair). The amend- ment will be stated for the information of the Senate. The Chair is of the impression that it is not now in order, there being now an amendment to an amendment pending. FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1099 The Secretary. After the word ‘‘ Fisheries,” in line 1; page 50, it is proposed to insert: Including rent for rooms for the use of said commission. Mr. Buarr. How will the whole clause read? Mr. Axuison. The Senator from Texas moved to strike out the paragraph and insert another paragraph. I think I can amend it first. The Presrpine Orricer. By unanimous consent the amendment will be considered as perfecting the text. It will be again stated. The Srcrerary. It is proposed to amend so as to make the clause read: To enable the Secretary of the Treasury to pay Mrs. Mary H.C. Baird, widow of the late Spencer F. Baird, $50,000, in full compensation for the services and expenses of the said Spencer F. Baird during his administration of the office of Commissioner of Fish and Fisheries, including rent of rooms for the use of said commission, from February 25, 1871, to the time of his death, in August, 1887. The Presipine Orricer. The question is on the amendment pro- posed by the Senator from Iowa to the amendment of the committee. The amendment to the amendment was agreed to. The Prestprne Orricer. Does the Senator from Texas now insist on his amemdment ? Mr. Reaaan. Yes, sir. The Presrpine Orricer. The amendment will be reported. The Secretary. It is proposed to strike out the amendment of the committee from line 20, on page 49, down to and including line 3, on page 50, and in lieu thereof to insert: For the rent of the house of the late Spencer F. Baird for the United States Fish Commission, and for his services as United States Fish Commissioner from 1871 to 1886, $25,000. . The Presipine Orricer. The question is on the amendment of the Senator from Texas to the amendment of the committee. The amendment to the amendment was rejected. The Prestpine Orricer. The question is on the amendment of the Committee on Appropriations. Mr. Berry. | ask for the yeas and nays on the adoption of the amendment proposed by the committee. The yeas and nays were ordered. Yeas, 29; nays 11. So the amendment was agreed to. August 1, 1888—Senate. In considering the sundry civil bill for 1889 (H. 10540)— The President pro tempore (Mr. Joun J. Incatts). Is a separate vote desired on any of the amendments made as in Committee-of the Whole? 1100 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Mr. J. H. Reaaan. I desire a separate vote on the amendment to give $50,000 to the widow of Professor Baird. x ee, x x % * x The PrestmpENT pro tempore. Is a separate vote desired on any amendment made in Committee of the Whole other than that reserved | by the Senator from Texas [Mr. Reagan]? If not, the Chair will put the question on concurring in the other amendments made as in Com- mittee of the Whole. | The amendments were concurred in. The PrEesIDENT pro tempore. The question recurs on the amendment . reserved, which will be stated. The CutEeF CLERK. On page 49, after line 19, the Senate, as in Com- mittee of the Whole, inserted the following: To enable the Secretary of the Treasury to pay Mrs. Mary H. C. Baird, widow of the late Spencer F. Baird, $50,000, in full compensation for the services and expenses of the said Spencer F. Baird during his administration of the office of Commissioner of Fish and Fisheries, including rent of rooms for the use of said commission, from February 25, 1871, to the time of his death, in August, 1887. ‘The PrEstDENT pro tempore. Will the Senate concur in this amendment? Mr. Reaaan. I ask for the yeas and nays on concurring in the amendment. The yeas and nays were ordered. Yeas, 28; nays, 11. Adopted. Mr. JoHn SHERMAN. IJ have no amendment to offer, but I wish to say a few words in regard to one amendment which has been adopted. I did not vote on the proposition simply because, while I was very much in favor of the allowance to Mrs. Baird of a reasonable sum, I thought the amount voted was too large, and therefore did not vote at all. . But I wish to state that the Senate has set a precedent in this matter. In the case of Professor Baird’s predecessor, Professor Henry, a very eminent man, and perhaps even more eminent in some respects than Professor Baird, he was allowed by the generosity of Congress $500 a year for the twenty-two years he served at the head of the Light-House Board, a scientific position, where he rendered great service to the Government. He died and the claim was made, and I had the honor of submitting it, and Congress generously allowed $10,000, expended for a house in which Professor Henry’s wife and children now live. The amount of $50,000 for fifteen years’ services of Professor Baird seems too large, but if it followed the precedent in Professor Henry’s case, or even if twice the amount was given that was allowed to Mrs. Henry, I should have voted for the amendment with pleasure. Mr. G. F. Epmunps. Mr. President, having now the right to speak on 4 FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1101 the question of the engrossment of the amendments and the third read- ing of the bill, I will say that the cases of Professor Henry and Mr. Baird were entirely different; but if you take the $500 a year extra allow- ance to Professor Henry for twenty-two years, that would make $11,000 of that. Then $11,000 more was given to Professor Henry; that made $22,000. He got $500 a year, it is stated, extra allowance during that period of time. Mr. SHerman. That was the only allowance ever made to Professor Henry, to my knowledge. Mr. Epmunps. I think the Senator is quite mistaken in that respect, but no matter about that. The difference between these two cases is so wide and obvious that if the Senator knew the facts I am sure he would agree to the propo- sition before the Senate; and that was this, that the amount of labor and responsibility as distinguished between a member of the Light- House Board and the enormous labor that was imposed upon Professor Baird in this administrative work is too obvious to require any length of time to state it. I merely refer to it. But during the whole of these fifteen years, when the Fish Commission work of propagating, etc., was going on, Professor Baird furnished, as Professor Henry did not, the rooms and appliances necessary to carry on that work out of his own private fortune and out of his own private rent; and if those rooms, thus necessarily occupied for the public interests, had been hired by the United States in the regular way from anybody else at an average of the rate that the United States is paying in this city of Washington all the time, it would take up a great deal more than half of this $50,000. Then, when you add to that the furniture, the attend- ance, the fuel, the lights, and everything which, besides the mere rent, goes into the account against the Treasury when we hire rooms and furnish them and take care of them, it would take one- -halt of the remainder that is left. So that, for the mere service of Professor Baird for these fifteen years which destroyed his life, you give his widow really about $10,000 or $12,000; and as to the rest youare merely returning the money that he actually spent out of his own pocket to promote your service. Mr. Suerman. Mr. President, Iam perfectly willing to be generous, and if we measure the work of both these officers at what it is really worth to science and the world, we could not pay for it in money. I agree tothat. Both of these gentlemen were scientific men, who devoted their lives to their pursuits. The idea, however, of paying $50,000 for fifteen years’ work seems to be an exaggeration, and it would be more in accordance with the character of Professor Baird to make the sum moderate. He never made any claim for any of this duri ing his lifetime. He rented a house probably worth $1,000 or $1,200 a year, a very respectable residence, 1102 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. and he occupied it and devoted a portion of it to scientific purposes, some of which was out of doors and some of which was indoors. At the same time, I think a very reasonable sum would be to allow from $15,000 to $20,000, and it would be more in accordance with the well- known position of Professor Baird, who never, I believe, in his life time made a demand for this sum, nor did Professor Henry, and I think it was greatly to their credit. I simply wished to explain why, though present in my seat, I did not vote upon that proposition. I trust that in the committee of con- ference the conferees on the part of the Senate may be able to estimate carefully the items that go to make up this sum. Mr. Cuanpuer. Mr. President, may I ask what is the question — before the Senate ? The PrEestpENT pro tempore. Shall the amendments be engrossed, and the bill be ordered to a third reading? Mr. CHAanpDLER. | desire to avail myself of the opportunity which has been occasioned by the debate between the Senator from Vermont [Mr. Edmunds] and the Senator from Ohio [Mr. Sherman] to say that for the reason given by the Senator from Ohio for not voting at all I voted against the amendment giving to the heirs of Professor Baird $50,000. I disagree entirely with the argument that the Congress of the United States can not vote money in a case of this kind unless the Goy- ernment of the United States owes a debt which can be recovered in the Court of Claims. I agree entirely with the argument of the Sen- ator from Massachusetts [Mr. Hoar] and the Senator from New York [Mr. Evarts] that there rests in this Government the power to recog- nize the services of those citizens who have been able in their lifetime to render distinguished service to the country or to illustrate the patri- otism of an American citizen, and therefore it was with no misgivings on the question of the power of Congress to make this donation that I declined to vote for the $50,000. I am willing to vote as a miscellaneous donation, but not as services or rent due but not collected, for the sum of $25,000. I am not will- ing to vote for the sum of $50,000; and as I am not willing to vote for that sum, I concluded that the natural and legitimate and appropriate method of expressing that dissent was to vote ‘‘nay” when the yeas and nays were Cmte Mr. J. R. Hawtey. Just a single Hat 8 In estimating the sum to be given here I would not only take into consideration the actual expenditures of that distinguished professor, but I would measure that donation, if you choose to call it so, by his distinguished services in general. In estimating what his labors were worth we have some guide in the sum that is fixed in the annual compensation of his Sue- cessor. Professor Baird was, in a measure, the originator and builder FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1108 of this greatly improved system. Mr. McDonald takes it from Mr. Baird well established in the general confidence, and we give him $5,000 a year, and for fifteen and a half years that would be nearly $80,000. Iam content to vote for the $50,000. The PrestpENT pro tempore. Shall the amendments be engrossed, and the bill be ordered to a third reading? The amendments were ordered to be engrossed, and the bill to be read a third time. The bill was read the third time and passed. August 17, 1888—Senate. Notice having been received that the House disagreed to certain Senate amendments, conferees were appointed: Mr. W. B. Allison, Mr. Eugene Hale, and Mr. J. B. Beck. August 20, 1888—House. Mr. W. H. Forney, Mr. James N. Burnes, and Mr. T. Ryan appointed conferees. Angust 27, 1888—Senate. Conferees reported disagreement. August 29, 1888 —Senate. Conferees appointed: Mr. Allison, Mr. Hale, and Mr. Beck. August 31, 1888—House. In considering the sundry civil bill for 1889, ven W. H. Forney moved that the House insist upon its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 105. - Amendment No. 105 was read, as follows: (105) To enable the Secretary of the Treasury to pay Mrs. Mary H. C. Baird, widow of the late Spencer F. Baird, $50,000, in full compensation for the services and expenses of the said Spencer F. Baird during his administration of the office of Com- missioner of Fish and Fisheries, including rent of rooms for the use of said Commis- sion, from February 25, 1871, to the time of his death, in August, 1887. Mr. T. Ryan. I suggest to my colleague that he pass that over for the present, as the gentleman from Ohio [Mr. Butterworth] desires to make some observations upon it. Mr. Forney. Very well; I ask unanimous consent that it be passed over informally. There was no objection. September 13, 1888—Senate. Mr. J. B. Beck excused as conferee and Mr. F. M. Cockrell appointed. September 18, 1888—House. Mr. W. H. Forney, from committee of conference, reported inability of conferees to agree to Senate amendment No. 105. September 20, 1888.—House. Further disagreement of conferees. 1104 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. September 21, 1888.—Senate. Mr. W. B. Allison reported from committee of conference that the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate No. 105 and agree to the same with an amendment: In lieu of the sum named in said amendment insert ‘‘$25,000 ;” and the Senate agree to the same. Passed. September 21, 1888.—House. Passed. September 24, 1888.—House. Mr. James N. Burnes submitted dnenes report that the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate No. 105, and agree to the same with an amendment: In lieu of the sum named insert ‘*$25,000.” | Conferees appointed: Mr. Forney, Mr. Burnes, and Mr. Ryan. October 2, 1888. Sundry civil act for 1889. To enable the Secretary of the Treasury to pay Mrs. Mary H. C. Baird, widow of the late Spencer F. Baird, $25,000, in full compen- sation for the services and expenses of the said Spencer F. Baird dur- ing his administration of the office of Commissioner of Fish and Fisheries, including rent of rooms for the use of said Commission from February 25, 1871, to the time of his death, in Spent? 1887. (Stat. XXV, 52 2.) STATUE OF SPENCER F. BAIRD. ogee 12, 1887—Senate. Mr. J.S. Morrill introduced a bill (S. 140): That the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution be, and are hereby, authorized to contract for a statue in bronze of Spencer F. Baird, late Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, to be erected upon the groundsin front of the National Museum; and for this purpose, and for the entire expense of the foundation and pedestal of the monument, the sum of $15,000, or so much of said sum as may be needed, is hereby appropriated, out of any moneys in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated. Referred to Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds. December 21, 1887—Senate. Mr. J. S. Morrill reported bill (S. 140) without amendment. February 9, 1888—Senate. Mr. J. S. Morritu. I ask unanimous consent to take up Senate bill 140. Mr. H. W. Brarr. I ask that the request be put in such a form that the unfinished business will be informally laid aside to consider the bill indicated by the Senator from Vermont. The PrestpENT pro tempore (Mr. J. J. Iyeauzs). The Senator from Vermont asks unanimous consent for the present consideration ’ FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1105 of the bill (S. 140) for the erection of a bronze statue of Spencer F. Baird, late Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. By unanimous consent, the Senate, as in Committee of the Whole, proceeded to consider the bill. Mr. Morr. The bill proposes a monument in front of the National Museum for perhaps the most distinguished civilian who has died in our country during the past year. His eminent scientific sery- ices are known to all of us. His unselfish and untiring work as Sec- retary of the Smithsonian Institution, with all the branches attached to it, has been conspicuous for years; and I think that perhaps there has been no measure proposed for a monument that will receive a more hearty response than this. Passed. February 13, 1888.—House. The bill (S. 140) referred to Committee on the Library. February 11, 1889—Senate. Mr. J. S. Morrill, from Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds, reported an amendment to be proposed to the sundry civil bill for 1890: That the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution be, and are hereby, authorized to contract for a statue in bronze of Spencer F. Baird, late Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, to be erected upon the grounds in front of the National Museum; and for this purpose, and for the entire expense of the foundation and pedestal of the monu- ment, the sum of $15,000, or so much of said sum as may be needed, is hereby appro- priated, out of any moneys in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated. Referred to Committee on Appropriations. BUREAU OF FINE ARTS. December 12, 1887—Senate. Mr. Wilkinson Call introduced a bill (S. 243): That there be, and is hereby, created in the Smithsonian Institution a bureau called the Bureau of the Fine Arts, the management of which is intrusted to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. Sec. 2. That the purpose and duties of this bureau shall be to aid in the develop- ment of the fine arts in the several States and Territories of the United States, by the reproduction, for the use of art schools and academies, of casts of statuary and other objects used in giving instruction in art; by preparing and distributing plans for the construction of buildings and the adaptation of rooms suitable for use as art schools, with printed plans for the organization of various grades of art academies and classes; by causing to be held annually, in Washington, District of Columbia, a public exhibition of works of art, open to all desiring to exhibit, in which the fairest possible opportunity for exposition shall be afforded all contributors; and by the publication of an annual register containing an account of new discoveries, inven- tions, and methods of instruction useful to students of art, together with a report of the progress of the fine arts in the United States. Sec. 3. That the reproductions and publications of the bureau shall be distributed among institutions of art, under such regulations as the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution may establish. H. Doce. 732 70 1106 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Src. 4. That the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution shall provide suitable quarters for the holding of the annual art exhibition. Src. 5. That for the purpose of carrying on the operations of this bureau there be, and is hereby, appropriated, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 188—, the sum of $———, to be paid by the Secretary of the Treasury out of any moneys in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, and expended under the direction of the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. Referred to Committee on the Library. G. B. GOODE, FISH COMMISSIONER. December 12, 1887—Senate. Executive nomination: G. Brown Goode, to be Commissioner of Fish and Fisheries, vice Spencer F. Baird, deceased. ROCK CREEK NATIONAL PARK. December 13, 1887—Senate. Mr. J. J. Ingalls introduced bill (S. 588) to establish Rock Creek Park. Referred to Committee on the District of Columbia. January 9, 1888—House. Mr. Jonathan H. Rowell introduced bill (H. 3328) to establish Rock Creek Park, in the District of Columbia. Referred to Committee on the District of Columbia. July 20, 1888—House. Mr. J. H. Rowell, from Committee on the District of Chee reported bill (H. 33 28. ) Referred to Calendar. December 21, 1888—Senate. Mr. J. S. Morrill proposed amendment: Provided, That in the event of the creation of a public park in the valley of Rock Creek the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution shall cooperate with the commis- sioners of the same in providing a common roadway or roadways through the tract of land assigned for the uses of the Zoological Park, and also in such other respects as may be deemed advisable in promoting the benefits and enjoyment of the people. January 14, 1889—House. Mr. J. J. Hemphill intr sawed bill (H. ieee! to establish a public park in the District of Columbia. Referred to Committee on the District of Colne January 25, 1889—Senate. Mr. G. F. Edmunds offered amendment to the bill for the District of Columbia for 1890: Src. —. For the establishment of a national park in the District of Columbia, $1,300,000, to be expended under and in accordance with the provisions following, that is to say: That, in order to establish a park in the District of Columbia, a commission shall be constituted, composed of three persons, namely, the Secretary of the Treasury, FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1107 the Secretary of the Interior, and the Attorney-General, which shall be known and designated as the commission for the establishment of a park. That the said commission is hereby authorized and directed to make an inspection of the country along Rock Creek, beginning at the point on that creek at Massachu- setts avenue extended, and extending upward along its course to where said creek is crossed by the road leading west from Brightwood, and to select from that district of country such a tract of land, including said creek and not more than one-fourth of a mile on each side thereof, on an average, as said commission shall deem to be suitable and appropriate for a park. That the said commission shall cause to be made a careful map of said park, show- ing the location, quantity, and character of each parcel of private property to be taken for such purpose, with the names of the respective owners inscribed thereon, and the said map shall be filed and recorded in the public records of the District of Columbia; and from and after that date the several tracts and parcels of land embraced in such park shall be held as condemned for public uses, subject to the payment of just compensation, to be determined by the said commission and approved by the President of the United States: Provided, That such compensation be accepted by the owner or owners of the several parcels of land. That if the said commission shall be unable to purchase any portion of the land so selected and condemned within thirty days after such condemnation, by agreement with the respective owners, at the price approved by the President of the United States, it shall, at the expiration of such period of thirty days, make application to the supreme court of the District of Columbia, by petition, at a general or special term, for an assessment of the value of such land, and said petition shall contain a particular description of the property selected and condemned, with the name of the owner or owners thereof, and his, her, or their residences, as far as the same can be ascertained, together with a copy of the recorded map of the park; and the said court is hereby authorized and required, upon such application, without delay, to notify the owners and occupants of the land, and to ascertain and assess the value of the land so selected and condemned by appointing three commissioners to appraise the value or values thereof, and to return the appraisement to the court; and when the values of such land are thus ascertained, and the President shall deem the same reasonable, said values shall be paid to the owner or owners, and the United States shall be deemed to have a valid title to said lands. That the said commission is hereby authorized to call upon the Superintendent of the Coast and Geodetic Survey, or the Director of the Geological Survey, to make such surveys as may be necessary to carry into effect the provisions of this section; and the said officers are hereby authorized and required to make such surveys under the direction of said commission. Mr. Grorcr F. Hoar. I desire to raise the question of order on that amendment. Mr. Epmunps. 1 will modify my amendment first, if the Senator will pardon me fora moment. Instead of ‘‘ $1,300,000” I wish it to read ‘* $500,000.” The President pro tempore (Mr. J. J. Incatus). The Secretary will state the proposed modification. . Mr. Epmunps. Everybody understands it. I propose to appropri- ate $500,000 instead of $1,300,000. The Srecrerary. In line 2 of the amendment it is proposed to strike out ‘‘one million three” and to insert ‘‘five;” so as to read: ** $500,000.” 1108 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Mr. Exr Sautsspury. I should like to ask the Senator from Ver- mont if there is any provision made for an appeal in case of condem- nation ? Mr. Epmunps. The amendment provides that if this commission of three heads of Departments can not agree upon the value of the land, they shall apply to the supreme court of the District, which proceeds judicially, and then, as in such cases, no appeal is provided for unless a question of law arises, and in that case an appeal is vested by gen- eral law. Mr. Hoar. I desire to raise the question that the amendment is not competent under Rule XVI. Mr. Epmunps. It is, I think. The PrestmbDENT pro tempore. Will the Senator indicate the clause of the rule? Mr. Epmunps. The amendment has been referred to the Committee on Appropriations, I think. Mr. Hoar. I raise the question that the amendment is irrelevant to the matter of the bill, and also the question that it proposes general legislation. I should like to inquire whether it has been reported by a standing committee and referred to the Committee on Appropriations more than twenty-four hours before being offered here / Mr. Morritz. I have reported from the Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds an amendment for a zoological park, not the amendment for a general park. Mr. Hoar. This is a separate amendment, and has not been referred to the Committee on Appropriations, I understand, twenty-four hours before being offered in the Senate. Mr. Epmunps. Mr. President The PresIpENT pro tempore. While the question of order is not strictly debatable, as an appeal would lie, the Chair will hear the Sen- ator from Vermont on the subject. Mr. Epmunps. I was under the impression that my colleague had reported from the Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds the amendment for a general park, but he says he only reported the one for a zoological park at $200,000. Therefore I think myself that the amendment would be subject to the point of order that it proposes a new item of appropriation which had not been referred to the Com- mittee on Appropriations. The other parts of the point of order I do not think are well founded. Mr. Hoar. If it would be out of order for any purpose, I suppose it is not necessary to pass on the other points at present. Mr. Epmunps. But the Chair may differ with my friend. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Chair would be compelled to hold that under the second paragraph of Rule XVI, technically the amend- FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1109 ment is open to the point of order suggested by the Senator from Massachusetts. January 26, 1889—House. Mr. J. J. Hempnuiwy reported, with amendments, bill (H. 12136) for establishment of a public park. Referred. January 28, 1889—House. * Mr. J. J. Hempnry asked for consideration by Committee of Whole of bill (H. 12136). Not agreed to. February 15, 1889—Senate. Mr. I. G. Harris reported with an amendment bill (S. 588) to estab- lish Rock Creek Park. Same as reported by Mr. Penn in the House, January 26, 1889. Referred to Daten of Whole. February 19, 1889—Senate. Mr. G. F. Epmunps. I move—and Senators all know what it is—the printed amendment’ that I offered to the District of Columbia appro- priation bill regarding the national park. I ask that it be referred to the Committee on Appropriations, so that, if they shall report it, it will be in order to-morrow. The President pro tempore (Mr. Joun J. Iyeatus). It will be so ordered, if there be no objection. Referred to Committee on Appropriations. APPOINTMENT OF REGENTS By the Vice-President. December 19, 1887—Senate. The President pro tempore (Mr. Joun J. Incauus.) The Chair appoints Randall Lee Gibson, Senator from the State of Louisiana, to serve upon the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, under the provisions of the Revised Statutes relating to that Institution, in the place of Samuel Bell Maxey, of Texas, whose term of office has expired. APPOINTMENT OF REGENTS By the Speaker. January 5, 1888—House. The Speaker (Mr. Jonn G. Car.isLE) announced the appointment of Samuel §. Cox, of New York, as Regent of the Smithsonian Insti- tution. 1See Senate proceedings, January 25, 1889. 1110 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. January 10, 1888—House. The Speaker (Mr. Joun G. CaRLisLE) announced the appointment of Joseph Wheeler and William Walter Phelps as Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. APPOINTMENT OF REGENTS By Joint Resolution. February 8, 1888—Senate. Mr. J. S. Morritx introduced a joint resolution (S. 50): That the existing vacancy in the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution of the class ‘‘ other than members of Congress’’ shall be filled by the appointment of Andrew D. White, of the State of New York, in place of Asa Gray, deceased. The President pro tempore (Mr. Joun J. InGauts). The joint reso- lution will be referred to the Committee on the Library. Mr. Morritu. I hardly think it necessary to refer the joint resolu- tion. Let it be printed and lie on the table. The PrEsIDENT pro tempore. It will be so ordered, if there be no objection. February 9, 1888—Senate. Mr. J. S. Morrimu. I ask for the consideration of Senate joint res- olution No. 50, for the appointment of a Regent for the Smithsonian Institution. The motion was agreed to; and the Senate, as in Committee of the Whole, considered and passed the joint resolution (S. 50). February 10, 1888—House. Mr. 8. S. Cox. With the permission of the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Lanham], I ask by unanimous consent to call up from the Speak- er’s table joint resolution (S. 50) appointing Andrew D. White a member of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, and to put it upon its passage. There was no objection, and the joint resolution was passed. February 15, 1888. Resolved, etc., That the existing vacancy in the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution of the class ‘‘other than members of Congress”, shall be filled by the appointment of Andrew D. White, of the State of New York, in place of Asa Gray, deceased. (Stat. XXV, 617.) CAPRON JAPANESE COLLECTION. December 21, 1887—Senate. Mr. Dante, W. VooruHEEs introduced a bill (S. 1033): That the sum of $10,000 be, and the same is hereby, appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the purchase of “‘the Capron collection of Japanese works of art,’’ now on temporary deposit in the National Museum, at Washington, D. C. Referred to Committee on the Library. Se a FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. DEEL February 23, 1888—Senate. Reported by Mr. D. W. Voorness, from Committee on the Library. March 1, 1888—Senate. Recommitted to Committee on the Library and bill (S. 2215) substi- tuted. March 5, 1888—House. Mr. R. H. M. Davipson, of Florida, introduced a bill (H. 8026): That the sum of $14,675 be, and the same is hereby, appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the purchase of ‘‘the Capron collection of Japanese works of art,’? now on temporary deposit in the National Museum, at Washington, District of Columbia. Referred to Committee on the Library. March 15, 1888—Senate. S. 1033, reported by Mr. Wirui1am M. Evarts; amended to appro- priate $14,675 instead of $10,000. March 31, 1888—Senate. S. 1033 considered and postponed indefinitely. March 31, 1888—Senate. S. 2215 passed. April 3, 1888—House. The bill (S. 2215) providing for the purchase of ‘‘ the Capron collec- tion of Japanese works of art” referred to Committee on the Library. August 8, 1888—House. Mr. Cuartres O’Neri1i, of Pennsylvania, from the Committee on the Library, submitted Report (H. 3221), on bill (S. 2215): The Committee on the Library, to which was referred the bill (S. 2215) providing for the purchase of *‘the Capron collection of Japa- nese works of art,” reports the same favorably and recommends its passage. This collection was made by the late Gen. Horace Capron, a gentle- man of great refinement, culture, and learning, while he was United States minister to Japan. It was carefully examined by Prof. G. Brown Goode, the assistant to the late Prof. Spencer F. Baird, Direc- tor of the National Museum, who estimated its value at about the sum proposed in the bill to be appropriated. The committee thinks the Government should have the ownership of this collection. It would be placed in the National Museum, where the many visitors from all parts of the country could see it. . Committed to Committee of the Whole. February 8. 1889—Senate. Mr. W. M. Evarts, from Joint Committee on the Library, reported an amendment to be proposed to the sundry civil bill for 1890: For the purchase of ‘tthe Capron collection of Japanese works of art,’’? now on temporary deposit in the National Museum at Washington, District of Columbia, $14,675. Referred to Committee on Appropriations, LIAB CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. February 19, 1889—House. Sundry civil bill considered. The next amendment was, on page 41, after line 9, to insert: Purchase of Capron collection of Japanese works of art: For the purchase of the Capron collection of Japanese works of art, now on temporary deposit in the National Museum at Washington, D. C., $10,000, or so much thereof as may be necessary. The amendment was agreed to. [This item failed, but was passed March 3, 1891. | ARMY MEDICAL MUSEUM AND LIBRARY. December 22, 1887—House. Deficiency estimates for 1887, ete. To reimburse the appropriation for the erection of a building for the Army Medical Museum and Library by the amount expended in moving a large wooden building belonging to the National Museum, so as to clear the site selected for the building in question, $245. SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, Washington, D. C., January 6, 1887. Str: I respectfully ask that the following item be inserted in the deficiency bill which you are about transmitting to Congress: To reimburse the appropriation for the erection of a building for the Army Medical Museum and Library by the amount for the building in question, $245. The annexed building in question was erected several years ago, for the pur- pose of carrying out a provision of Congress for the participation by the National Museum, United States Fish Commission, and the United States Geological Survey in the New Orleans National Exhibition, and had been placed where it was most con- venient at the time. Subsequently, when a site was selected for the new building for the Army Medical Museum, this construction was found to encroach to such an extent as to make it necessary to move it some 50 or more feet, and as there was no appropriation available for the purpose, it was done at the expense of the appropria- tion for the construction of the Army Medical Museum building, the demands upon which have been very great, so as to naturally induce the desire for reimbursal. Unfortunately the National Museum has no funds applicable to this purpose, and the subject is respectfully transmitted to Congress for its action. Very respectfully, Spencer F. Barrp, Secretary Smithsonian Institution. Hon. Danie, MANNING, Secretary of the Treasury, Washington, D. C. Referred to Committee on Appropriations. SEMON BACHE & CO. December 22, 1887—House. Deficiency estimates for 1887, etc. To refund the duty paid by Semon Bache & Co., of New York, upon glass from imported stock furnished to the National Museum and FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1113 the New Orleans, Louisville, and Cincinnati expositions, for exhibition cases, $3,562.56. Norr.—In explanation I would state that from time to time for several years past the Treasury Department has, at the request of the Smithsonian Institution, granted free permits for importations of glass to offset the duty paid on that furnished from stock to the National Museum, and the New Orleans, Cincinnati, and Louisville expo- sitions by the firm in question; but in the summer of 1884 an order was issued by the Treasury Department declining to grant further permits unless the glass came directly through the custom-house to this city, this order proving retroactive with regard to Messrs. Bache & Co. Theamount of duties now asked to be refunded we have found to be correct, and covers the entire liability of the Government on this account to the firm mentioned, to the present date. September 26, 1888. Be it enacted, etc., That the Secretary of the Treasury be, and he is hereby, authorized to pay to Semon Bache & Company, of New York, the sum of $3,562.56, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the purpose of refunding the duty paid by said firm upon glass from imported stock furnished to the National Museum and the New Orleans, Louisville, and Cincinnati expositions for exhibition cases. (Stat., X XV, 1190.) EXPOSITIONS. Washington, D. C., Exposition. January 5, 1888—Senate. Mr. George F. Hoar introduced a bill (S. 1165) to provide for a world’s exposition at the national capital in 1892, and thereafter a permanent exposition of the three Americas in honor of the four hundredth anniversary of the discovery of America. * * * * * * * Sec. 5. That space be assigned in some Government reservation in the city of Washington for the following permanent governmental buildings, namely: (1) Space for the enlargement of the present National Museum into a continental or three Americas museum, said space to be available whenever the necessary funds are provided for said purpose. (2) Space for a permanent building, under the control of the Interior Department, for the exhibit of working models of important American inventions, said space to be available whenever the necessary funds are provided for said purpose. Referred to Committee on the Centennial of the Constitution and the Discovery of America. Melbourne Exposition. February 1, 1888. Joint resolution. Whereas the British Government has extended to the Government of the United States an invitation to participate in the international exhibition which is to be held at Melbourne, beginning on the 1st day 1114 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. of August, 1888, to celebrate the centenary of the founding of New South Wales: Therefore, Resolved, etc., That said invitation is accepted, and that there be, and there hereby is, appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury of the United States not otherwise appropriated, the sum of $50,000, or so much thereof as may be necessary to effect the purpose of this resolution, to be expended in the discretion of the Secretary of State for the purpose of such representation at said exhibition. Src. 2. That it shall be the duty of the Secretary of State to trans- mit to Congress a detailed statement of the expenditures which may have been incurred under the provisions of this resolution, together with any reports which may be made by the representatives of this country at said exhibition. (Stat., XXV, 617.) Barcelona Exposition. April 11, 1888. Joint resolution. Whereas the Spanish Government has extended to the Government of the United States an invitation to participate in the international exhibition which is to be held at Barcelona, Spain, commencing in the month of April, 1888: Resolved, ctc., That said invitation is accepted, and that there be, and there hereby is, appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury of the United States not otherwise appropriated, the sum of $25,000, or so much thereof as may be necessary to effect the purpose of this resolution, to be expended in the discretion of the Secretary of State for the purpose of such representation at said exhibition. Src. 2. That it shall be the duty of the Secretary of State to trans- mit to Congress a detailed statement of the expenditures which may have been incurred under the provisions of this resolution, together with any reports which may be made by the representatives of this country at said exhibition. (Stat. XXV, p. 620.) Paris Exposition. May 10, 1888. Joint resolution. Whereas the United States have been invited by the Republic of France to take part in an exposition of works of art and the products of manufactures and agriculture of all nations, to be held in Paris, commencing the 5th day of May and closing the 31st day of October, 1889: Therefore, Resolved, etc., That said invitation is accepted, and that the governors of the several States and Territories be, and are hereby, requested to FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1115 invite the people of their respective States and Territories to assist in the proper representation of the productions of our industry and of the natural resources of the country, and to take such further measures as may be necessary in order to secure to their respective States and Territories the advantages to be derived from this beneficent under- taking. Src. 2. That the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint a commissioner-general to represent the United States in the proposed exposition, and under the general direc- tion of the Secretary of State, to make all needful rules and regula- tions in reference to the contributions from this country, and to control the expenditures incident to the proper installation and exhibit thereof; the pay of jurors, and the preparation of the reports on the exposition, and the general results thereof; and an assistant commissioner-general to act under the direction of the commissioner-general, who shall perform the duties of commissioner-general in case of his death or disability; and that the President may also appoint as assistants to the commissioner-general nine scientific experts, corresponding to and specifically assigned to the nine groups into which the exposition will, under the official regulations be divided; that the allowance to said commissioner-general for salary and personal expenses shall not exceed $10,000 for his whole term of office; that the allowance of said assistant commissioner-general for salary and personal expenses shall not exceed $5,000 for his term of office, and the allowance of the nine scientific experts for salary and personal expenses shall not exceed $1,500 each, not including such clerical service as may be allowed by the commis- sioner-general, which shall not exceed $15,000. Src. 3. That in order to defray the necessary expenses above authorized, and for the proper installation of the exhibition, and the expenditures of the commissioner-general made under the direction of the Secretary of State, and with his approval, and not otherwise, there be, and hereby is, appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury of the United States not otherwise appropriated, the sum of $250,000, or so much thereof as may be necessary for the purposes herein specified, which sum shall be expended under the direction of the Secretary of State; the Commissioner of Agriculture is hereby authorized to collect and prepare suitable specimens of the agricultural productions of the several States and Territories of the Union for exhibition at the Paris Exposition and accompany the same with a report respecting such productions, to be printed in the English, French, and German lan- guages, the expense of the same to be paid out of said appropriation. Src. 4. That it shall be the duty of the Secretary of State to transmit to Congress a detailed statement of the expenditures which may have been incurred under the provisions of this resolution, together with all reports called for under section 2 of this resolution, which reports 1116 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. shall be prepared and arranged with a view to concise statement and convenient reference. (Stat., XX'V, 620.) October 10, 1888—Senate. Mr. J. N. Doxrn introduced a joint resolution (S. 115): Resolved, etc., That the Executive and other Departments of the Government, the National Museum, the Geological Survey, and the Smithsonian Institute, be, and they are hereby, authorized to use for exhibition at the Paris Exposition of 1889 such articles and cases as may be on hand and for which space can be obtained; and that any unexpended balance of the appropriation for the Cincinnati Exhibition of 1888 may be applied for the preparation and boxing of such exhibits. Mr. Dotex. This joint resolution was handed to me by an officer of the State Department to-day. He came here to see the chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations, who is absent. The resolution, I think, will meet no opposition. I have consulted all the members of the Committee on Foreign Relations who are present to-day, and all are in favor of the resolution and agree to its being pat upon its pas- sage now. Mr. Gro. F. Hoar. What does the joint a Aaiees comprehend? It seems to be pretty vague in description. I should like to have it read once more. The President pro tempore (Mr. J. J. Incauts). The joint resolu- tion will be read the second time at length. The joint resolution was read the second time. Mr. Hoar. I do not understand what the phrase means, ‘‘the Executive and other Departments of the Government.” _ What are the ‘other Departments ” ? Mr. Dorn. I understand that the articles which it is proposed to place on exhibition at the Paris Exposition are the articles which are now on exhibition at Cincinnati, Ohio. Mr. Hoar. The joint resolution does not say so. Mr. Dorn. I send to the desk and ask to have read a letter from the Acting Secretary of State to the chairman of the committee, which was handed to me in the absence of the chairman. The PresmpENT pro tempore. The letter will be read, if there be no objection. The Secretary read as follows: DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Washington, October 10, 1888. Sir: The attention of this Department has been called to the fact that, without Congressional action, the Director of the National Museum will have no authority to have articles shipped from that collection to Paris. The same is true of articles in the possession of the Smithsonian Institution and the Bureau of Ethnology, all of which departments of the Goyernment would be able at trifling expense, if author- ized to do so, to make a satisfactory and creditable display at the Paris Exposition which opens in May, 1889. EE — a FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1117 It will be quite unnecessary to make any further appropriation of funds for the purpose indicated if the unexpended balance of the sum appropriated for the Cincin- nati Exposition may be devoted to packing and preparing the exhibits made by the Government there, and transferring them to Paris. All that is desired is that authority should be given to the various Departments of the Government that have articles on hand to use them in the direction indicated. It is proposed by the com- missioner-general, who, I believe, has been in correspondence with the authorities of the Smithsonian Institution and the Geological Survey, that little more should be done than transfer the articles now on exhibition at Cincinnati to Paris. A form of a proposed resolution is hereto appended. I have the honor to be, sir, your obedient servant, G. L. Rives, Acting Secretary. Hon. JoHN SHERMAN, Chairman Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate. Inclosure: Joint resolution (proposed). Mr. Hoar. The joint resolution is slovenly, unmeaning, and utterly unworthy of the Senate or of a legislative body. The Senator from Oregon ought to put it in proper shape before it is passed. The Geological Survey— What is the ‘‘ Geological Survey” as an official ? The Geological Survey is hereby authorized to use for exhibition at the Paris Exposition of 1889 such articles and cases as may be on hand. Where? It is accompanied by a letter saying that it refers to the articles which have been already exhibited at Cincinnati. The executive and other departments of the Government— are also authorized. There is no limitation im the joint resolution to articles which have been exhibited at Cincinnati. Mr. Dorn. I will ask the Senator if he knows of any such resolu- tion that has been passed which specifies the articles in the different departments which are to be put on exhibition? Mr. Hoar. The resolution might at least state, not indicating the several articles, that the responsibility of selecting such articles should be put upon some official or person named. Mr. Dorn. I understand the resolution to do that. It specifies the heads of the various bureaus or departments which have the articles. Mr. Hoar. It seems to me very extraordinary legal phraseology to say that the Geological Survey is authorized to send to Paris ‘‘such articles and cases as may be on hand.” Mr. Doxpu. | am not going to get up a controversy with the Sena- tor from Massachusetts about the joint resolution. I did not draw it. It was transmitted here by the Department of State Mr. Hoar, I shall object to it until it is put in proper form. 1118 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Mr. Doten. Otherwise I might feel disposed to defend the joint resolution and its phraseology. Mr. Hoar. I object to its present consideration. Mr. H. M. Tetter. While ‘‘ the Geological Survey” is a common term, perhaps it is not technically correct. That designation ought to be stricken out and the Interior Department inserted. The Geo- logical Survey is but a bureau under the Secretary of the Interior. Mr. Dorn. I have no objection to that amendment being made. I will modify the joint resolution in that manner if it will be satisfac- tory to the Senator from Massachusetts; but if the rest of the resolu- tion is not satisfactory to him, of course it must go over. The PresipeNT pro tempore. The joint resolution having been read twice, is there objection to its present consideration ? Mr. Hoar. I object. The PRrEsIDENT pro tempore. The resolution will be referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations or placed on the Calendar, at the option of the Senator from Oregon. Mr. Dotpn. Let it go on the Calendar. The PrEsIDENT pro tempore. The joint resolution will be placed on the Calendar. October 15, 1888—Senate. Joint resolution (S. 115) relating to the Paris Exposition of 1889 being considered, Mr. Jonn T. Morean said: Mr. President—— The President pro tempore (Mr. Jonn J. IncAuus). Does the Sena- tor from Georgia yield to the Senator from Alabama? -Mr. JoserH E. Brown. I will yield to the Senator from Alabama, but I shall not yield further. My remarks will not be lengthy. Mr. Morean. I desire to call up the joint resolution (S. 115) author- izing the departments of the Government to use articles in their possession for exhibition at the Paris Exhibition of 1889. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Is there objection to the present con- sideration of the joint resolution ? Mr. GrorcE F. Hoar. Let it be read for information. Mr. Morean. I offer a substitute for it. Mr. Hoar. Let the substitute be read. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The amendment will be read. The Secretary. It is proposed to strike out all after the resolving clause and insert: That the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of War, the Secretary of the Navy, the Postmaster-General, the Secretary of the Interior, the Attorney-General, the Commissioner of Agriculture, the Secretary of the Smith- sonian Institution, the Director of the National Museum, the Commissioner of the Fish Commission, and the Commissioner of Labor be, and they are severally hereby, authorized, in their discretion, to use for exhibition at the Paris Universal Expo- sition of 1889 such articles as may be available for said exposition, and that any FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1119 unexpended balances of the appropriations for the Cincinnati Exhibition of 1888 may be applied for that purpose. By unanimous consent, the Senate, as in Committee of the Whole, proceeded to consider the joint resolution. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The question is on agreeing to the amendment proposed by the Senator from Alabama [Mr. Morgan]. The amendment was agreed to. The joint resolution as amended was passed. Brussels Exposition. May 11, 1888. Joint resolution. Whereas the Belgian Government has extended to the Government of the United States an invitation to participate in the International Exhibition which is to be held at Brussels, Belgium, commencing in the month of May, 1888: Resolwed, etc., That said invitation is accepted and that there be, and there hereby is, appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury of the United States not otherwise appropriated, the sum of $30,000, or so much thereof as may be necessary, to effect the purpose of this resolution, to be expended in the discretion-of the Secretary of State for the purpose of such representation at said exhibition. Src. 2. That it shall be the duty of the Secretary of State to trans- mit to Congress a detailed statement of the expenditures which may have been incurred under the provisions of this resolution, together with any reports which may be made by the representatives of this country at said exhibition. (Stat., X XV, 622.) Cincimmati Exposition. May 28, 1888. An act, ete. Whereas the States which comprise the Northwest Territory and the adjacent States will hold at Cincinnati, Ohio, from July 4 to October 27, 1888, a centennial exposition commemorative of the organization of the Northwest Territory, under the ordinance of 1787, in which exposition all the States and Territories of the United States and the General Government have been invited to participate, the object being in said exposition to present a panorama of the nation’s resources and present state of progressive development by an exhibi- tion of the products of agriculture, of the various industries and fine arts; also the results of advancement made in the sciences; the whole illustrating the opportunities secured to and the possibilities which wait upon the citizens of this Republic; and Whereas the citizens of the Ohio Valley and the several States adja- cent thereto have made suitable and adequate preparation and arrange- 1120 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. ments for holding said exposition, and are desirous—and it being fit and proper—that the several Executive Departments of the Govern- ment, the Department of Agriculture, the Smithsonian Institution, including the National Museum and Commission of Fish and Fisher- ies, should participate in said exhibition: Therefore, Be it enacted, etc., That the head of each of the several Executive Departments of the Government, the Commissioner of Agriculture, and the Smithsonian Institution, including the National Museum, and Commission of Fish and Fisheries, under the direction of the Presi- dent of the United States, be, and they are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and make suitable exhibits at the said Centennial Exposition of the Ohio Valley and Central States, to be held at Cin- cinnati, beginning on the 4th of July and closing October 27, 1888. That there shall be appointed a committee of Congress composed of ten members, five to be appointed by the President of the Senate and five by the Speaker of the House of Representatives. Said committee is authorized and directed to visit said exposition and make such report to Congress in that behalf as they may deem needful and proper: /ro- vided, That the President may in the exercise of his discretion allow such documents and exhibits as relate to early settlement at Marietta, Ohio, and the establishment of civil government in the territory north- west of the Ohio River, to be taken to Marietta, and exhibited during the time from July 15th to 19th, 1888, inclusive, under such restric- tions and custody as he may direct. That to enable the several Executive Departments of the Govern- ment, the Department of Agriculture and the Smithsonian Institution, including the National Museum, and the Commission of Fish and Fish- eries, to participate in said exposition, to be held as aforesaid, there is hereby appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $147,750, apportioned as follows: For the War Department, $7,150. For the Navy Department, $15,000. For the State Department, $2,500. For the Treasury Department, $7,500. For the Interior Department, $36,100. For the Department of Agriculture, $20,000. For the Post-Office Department, $5,000. For the Department of Justice, $2,000. For the Smithsonian Institution, including the Commission of Fish and Fisheries, $50,000. For expenses of the committee of Congress, $2,500. That the President may, if in his judgment it shall be deemed nec- essary and expedient in order to secure the best results with greatest economy, transfer a part of the fund hereby apportioned to one department or bureau to another department or bureau. The term —_———_—- FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. Ned bureau wherever used herein shall be construed to include the Agri- cultural Department, the Smithsonian Institution, and Commission of Fish and Fisheries. ' That the President of the United States is hereby authorized to detail an officer of the Pay Department of the Army or Navy to dis- burse the fund appropriated by this act. The payments on account of expenses incurred in carrying out and into effect the provisions hereof shall be made on itemized vouchers approved by the representative of the department incurring the lia- bility, and a person to be designated by the President to make final audit of said accounts: Provided, That payment of the expenses incurred by the committee of Congress shall be made on vouchers approved by the chairman of said committee. That the head of each of said Executive Departments and of the Department of Agriculture, Smithsonian Institution, and Commission of Fish and Fisheries shall, from among the officers or employees thereof, appoint a suitable person to act as representative of such department or bureau, and said representative shall, under the direc- tion and control of the head of the department or bureau, supervise the preparation and conduct of the exhibits herein provided for. That no officer or employee appointed as aforesaid shall be paid extra or additional compensation by reason of services rendered in virtue of such employment; but nothing herein shall be so construed as to prevent the payment of the just and reasonable expenses of any committee, officer, or employee appointed or employed under and by virtue of the provisions of this act. That all articles imported from the Republic of Mexico or the Dominion of Canada for the purpose of being exhibited at said expo- sition shall be admitted free of duty, subject, however, to such condi- tions and regulations as the Secretary of the Treasury may impose and prescribe. (Stat., X XV, 159.) June 28, 1888—Senate. Mr. John Sherman, Mr. W. B. Allison, Mr. C. F. Manderson, Mr. A. H. Colquitt, and Mr. J. H. Berry, appointed by President of the Senate to attend the Ohio Exposition. June 28, 1888—House. Mr. B. Butterworth, Mr. W. M. Springer, Mr..W. C. P. Breckin- ridge, Mr. G. W. Steele, and Mr. M. H. Ford, by the Speaker of the House. July 16, 1888. Joint resolution. Resolved, etc., That it is the true intent and meaning of the act of Congress approved May 28, 1888, by the President of the United States, entitled ‘“‘An act making appropriation to enable the several H. Doe. 732 71 Lee CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Executive Departments of the Government, and the Bureau of Agri- culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, including the National Museum and the Commission of Fish and Fisheries, to participate in the Centennial Exposition of the Ohio Valley and Central States, to be held at Cincinnati, Ohio, from July 4 to October [2]7, 1888,” that the President of the United States may, in his discretion, make an order directing that any documents, papers, maps not original, books or other exhibits which properly and pertinently relate to the establishment of civil government in the territory northwest of the . Ohio River, may be sent upon an Executive order from any of the several departments in said act named, or from the exhibits now at Cincinnati, and that the appropriation of money in said act to defray the expenses of such exhibits may be made applicable, in so far as the Pres- ident of the United States may direct, to the payment of the expenses. of the care, transportation to, and return of such exhibits from Mari- etta. And the same shall be paid from such fund heretofore set apart for each department as the President may order. Nor shall anything in said act be so construed as to prevent the purchase of suitable mate- rials and the employment of proper persons to complete or modify series of objects and classes of specimens when in the judgment of the head of any department such purchase or employment or both is nec- essary in the proper preparation and conduct of an exhibit. Nor to authorize the removal from their places of deposit in Washington of any original paper or document or laws or ordinances whatever. (Stat., XXV, 626.) October 20, 1888. Joint resolution. Resolved, etc., That authority is hereby granted to continue until and including November 15, 1888, the exhibits made by the Govern- ment at the Centennial Exposition of the Ohio Valley and Central States, at Cincinnati, Ohio, under authority of the act approved May 28, 1888. (Stat., XXV, 634.) Marietta Exposition. (See Cincinnati Exposition.) ETHNOLOGY—BULLETINS. January 9, 1888—House. Mr. A. G. Carutu introduced a joint resolution (H. 50): That there be printed at the Government Printing Office 6,000 copies of any matter furnished by the Bureau of Ethnology relating to researches and discoveries con- nected with the study of the North American Indians; the same to be issued in parts os FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1128 and the whole to form an annual yolume of bulletins; 1,000 of which shall be for the use of the Senate, 2,000 for the use of the House of Representatives, and 3,000 for distribution by the Bureau of Ethnology. Referred to Committee on Printing. [Never acted on. | June 18, 1888—Senate. Mr. James K. Jones, of Arkansas, introduced a joint resolution (S. 95) to print bulletins of Bureau of Ethnology. Referred to Committee on Printing. July 20, 1888—Senate. Mr. C. F. Manprrson, from Committee on Printing, submitted a report (S. 1875) on (S. joint resolution 95). ; Section 3795 of the Revised Statutes provides that ‘‘all propositions in either House of Congress for printing extra copies of documents, the cost of which exceeds $500, shall be by concurrent resolution.” The committee, proposing to report in favor of the printing of the report above mentioned, and desiring to comply with the law, recom- mend that the joint resolution be indefinitely postponed, and that in lieu thereof the Senate pass a concurrent resolution herewith reported. The number of copies proposed to be printed is less by 4,000 than authorized by the resolution for printing the bulletins of the previous year. The estimated cost, as per the Public Printer’s letter herewith sub- mitted, is $3,990. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, Washington, D. C., July 2, 1888. Str: The estimated cost of printing the ‘‘matter furnished by the Bureau of Eth- nology relating to researches and discoveries connected with the study of the North American Indians,’’ as provided for in Senate resolution No. 95, is $3,990. The approximate cost of the amount of printing previously estimated upon for Congress within the present fiscal year is $1,365,705.90. Very respectfully, G. H. BENEDICT, Chief Clerk for the Public Printer. Hon. Cuas. F. MANDERSON, Chairman Committee on Printing, United States Senate. Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That there be printed at the Government Printing Office 6,000 copies of any matter furnished by the Bureau of Ethnology relating to researches and discoveries connected with the study of the North American Indians; the same to be issued in parts and the whole to form an annual volume of bulletins, 1,000 of which shall be for the use of the Senate, 2,000 for the use of the House of Representatives, and 3,000 for distribution by the Bureau of Ethnology. Passed. : July 28, 1888—House. Passed. 1124 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. ETHNOLOGY—REPORTS. June 18, 1888—Senate. Mr. J. K. Jones introduced a joint resolution (S. 98), to print eighth and ninth Reports of the Bureau of EOE Ne Referred to Committee on Printing. July 19, 1888—Senate. Mr. Cuares F. Manperson, from Committee on Printing, reported adversely S. 98, providing for printing the eighth and ninth Annual Reports of the inieewny of the Bureau of Ethnology, with the recom- mendation that it be indefinitely postponed, and in lieu thereof reported a concurrent resolution, and asked for its consideration. (The estimated cost of usual number, $2,103.85; for 15,500 copies, bound in cloth, $31,869.65.) The President pro tempore (Mr. J. J. Incas). The adverse report will be agreed to if there be no objection, and the joint resolution will be indefinitely postponed. Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That there be printed at the Government Printing Office 15,500 copies each of the Eighth and Ninth Annual Reports of the Director of the Bureau of Ethnology, with accompanying papers and illustrations, and uniform with the preceding volumes of the series, of which 3,500 shall be for the use of the Senate, 7,000 for the use of the House of Representatives, and 5,000 for distribution by the Bureau of Ethnology. Agreed to. July 24, 1888—House. : Mr. J. D. RicHarpson reported Senate concurrent resolution. July 28, 1888—House. Passed. GENERAL JAMES SHIELDS’S SWORDS. January 9, 1888—House. Mr. C. H. Mansour introduced bill (H. 37 96) for purchase of Shields’s swords. Referred to Committee on Military Affairs. January 9, 1888—House. A bill (H. 3814) introduced by Mr. M. L. Crarpy. Referred to Committee on Military Affairs. February 8, 1888—House. H. 3796 reported by Mr. G. D. Truman and referred to Committee of the Whole. March 8, 1888—House. Remarks were made by Mr. George D. Tillman, Mr. George W. Steele, Mr. C. H. Mansur, Mr. William H. Hatch, Mr. Jehu Baker, Mr. J. L. MacDonald, Mr. William M. Springer, Mr. Binger Her- man, Mr. W. C. Oates, Mr. Silas Hare, Mr. Joseph Wheeler, Mr. J. FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1125 M. Glover, Mr. C. R. Buckalew, and Mr. B. M. Cutcheon in favor of purchasing certain swords of the widow and children of the late Gen. James Shields. Mr. C. A. Boute.ie. Before the previous question is called, I ask the gentleman from South Carolina if the bill [H. 3796] is not slightly ambiguous in its closing words as to the disposition of these trophies? It says: When so purchased the same to be deposited with the other military archives of the nation. Is that phraseology well understood? What disposition will be made of these swords under the bill? All the gentlemen who have spoken have referred to the importance of the purchase of these relics and their ownership by the Govern- ment as pointing to an example of illustrious patriotism and giving an incitement to the emulation of future generations. It strikes me this bill is slightly vague in its provision in the closing lines, so as to leave some doubt as to whether these trophies shall be placed in a position where they can be seen by the people. Mr. Titiman. In reply to the gentleman from Maine I will say this bill was drawn by the gentleman from Missouri [Mr. Mansur] and was reported back to the House by the Military Committee without amendment. We thought it was very modest in the price it fixed, and we also thought that the provision leaving the whole matter in the hands of the Secretary of War was ample protection for the Goy- ernment to dispose of these mementos properly. I presume they will be deposited either in the National Museum or in the War Department. Mr. Bouretxe. The Secretary of War, in a recent communication to the House, has stated that the lack of legislation or of instructions by Congress as to the disposition of certain relics and trophies has prevented the War Department from making any such disposition of them. Mr. Truuman. Iam ready to accept any amendment which may be suggested by the gentleman from Maine to accomplish his object, and will thank him to suggest one. It occurs to me the National Museum would be the appropriate place. Mr. Bouretie. I am not particular about the place, but I would suggest some such amendment as this. Let the last clause of the bill be so amended as to read: When so purchased the same to be deposited and publicly displayed, with the other military archives of the nation, in some appropriate place at the national seat of government. 1126 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. I am willing to leave the selection with the Secretary of War. Mr. Tirruman. | should prefer it if the gentleman would suggest in his amendment the National Museum. That seems to me the most appropriate place. Mr. G. W. E. Dorsry. That is right. Mr. BourE.ue. I would prefer not to specify the place, for I do not like to dictate the selection. My only object is to provide that they shall be displayed, as was provided by the original law of 1814 in regard to matters of this kind, at some place to be designated by the President and the Secretary of War. Mr. Benton McMitu1n. Let the amendment be reported. The amendment was read. Mr. McMurry. I wish to ask the gentleman from Maine [Mr. Boutelle] one other question; what other trophies or archives he has reference to in the amendment he has offered and in the explanation he has made? Mr. BourEiue. I asked the question as to what was referred to in the bill in relation to that. Mr. McMiurn. Some are in one place, some in another. They are not all together. It may be convenient to put these in one place. Is it designed to collect them all in one place and make a public exhibit? Mr. Bouretie. The amendment does not require that they shall all be displayed in the same place. Mr. McMrruin. Does this seek to control the dspiny of other mementos or archives of the war than the two swords? Mr. Boutrtie. I had nothing to do with preparing the proposition providing for this purchase. I do not favor the purchase. I am sim- ply amending the wording of the original bill. Mr. McMruuiy. Your only object, I understand, is to control these swords as to where they shall be placed ? Mr. Bouter tye. To perfect the reading of this bill. Mr. McMiturn. But is your only object to control the location of these swords? Mr. Bouretie. If the gentleman will be kind enough to make a distinct statement of what he wants to know from me, I will try to answer him. Mr. McMuu1n. I want to know what object you wish to accomplish by your amendment? Mr. Bourettez. I will endeavor to inform the gentleman very sim- ply. I took up this bill a few minutes ago; I did not frame the bill; I did not originate it, and I know nothing about it. I find, however, that it says, in effect, that the Secretary o War, after the parchhies of these pos, shall deposit them with the other military archives of the . : : FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. LiZ7 nation. Now, I do not pretend to say what those are; I do not know; I have no idea what was intended by the wording of that portion of the bill. I presume something was meant; but I suggested that it left the matter vague, that there was no provision that these swords should be placed anywhere for public inspection; and inasmuch as the Secre- tary of War has stated in a recent report that the want of legislation of that character has prevented him, or prevented the War Department, for many years from making any public disposition or display of . articles which may come under the general classification of ‘military archives,” I suggested that if these relics were to be purchased for the purpose of being exhibited to the people, we had better provide for that in the bill. For that reason I suggested such additional words, by way of amendment, as would accomplish precisely that result. So far as the other words that are left in the bill are concerned, I have no responsibility for them and no intention in connection with them. Mr. McMinn. But you spoke of the fact that a report has been made from the War Department stating that there is an absence of legislation concerning the public exhibition of the other archives referred to. Now, is it your object to accomplish anything, with ref- erence to those other military archives beyond these particular swords? I suspect that is the object, and oppose it. SeveRAL Mempers. Regular order! Mr. Titiman. Mr. Speaker, I yield two minutes to the gentleman from New York [Mr. Charles 8. Baker]. Mr. Baxer of New York. Mr. Speaker, I think this whole difficulty may be composed by a suggestion in the nature of an amendment pro- viding that these swords be placed on permanent exhibition in the National Museum. SEVERAL Members. That is right. Mr. Baker of New York. I move that amendment as a substitute for the amendment of the gentleman from Maine [Mr. Boutelle]. The Speaker pro tempore (Mr. S. S. Cox). The clerk will report the proposed substitute. The Crier read as follows: In line 9, after the word ‘‘nation,’’ insert ‘‘in some public place at the National Museum.”’ The substitute offered by Mr. Baker of New York was agreed to. Mr. Mansur. Mr. Speaker, I move to amend, in line 50, by striking out the words ‘‘actual cost not to exceed,” leaving the amount $10,000. Mr. McMuiun. I hope the gentleman from Missouri will not insist on that. Mr. B. M. Curcutron. I hope that will be withdrawn. It never has been before the committee. 1128 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Mr. Mansur. Well, let the amendment stand, but change the word “ten” to ‘‘eight”, making $8,000, which is the actual amount the two legislatures paid for the swords. SrverAL Mempers. Oh,no. Withdraw your amendment. - Mr. Mansur. Well, Mr. Speaker, I withdraw the amendment. Mr. Trttman. I now move the previous question on the bill as amended. The previous question was ordered. The bill as amended was ordered to be engrossed and read a third. time; and being engrossed, it was accordingly read the third time. Mr. W. C. Oates. Mr. Speaker, let us have the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were refused, one-fifth not voting in favor thereof. The bill (H. 3796) as amended was then passed. March 8, 1888—Senate. Referred to Committee on Library. March 15, 1888—Senate. Reported by Mr. W. M. Evarts. April 11, 1888—Senate. Passed. ‘April 19, 1888. An act, ete. Whereas the State of Illinois and the State of South Carolina, after the war with Mexico, each presented to the late Gen. James Shields a sword, in consideration of gallant and meritorious services rendered by him in said war; and Whereas he has left surviving him a widow and three minor chil- dren, with but limited means of support, and said swords, though costly and valuable, can not be divided and apportioned between said children, and their value is needed for the education and support of said children: Therefore, Be it enacted, etc., That the Secretary of War be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to purchase of said widow and children said swords, at their actual cost, not to exceed the sum of $10,000, to be paid for out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, and when so purchased the same to be deposited with the other mili- tary archives of the nation, in some public place at the National Museum. (Stat., XXV, 86.) July 23, 1888 —House. Mr. Cuarutes H. Mansur introduced a joint resolution (H. 202; Report 3400) to construe an act passed at this session entitled ‘‘An ot, ten “ll ie "eS FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1129 act to purchase of the widow and children of the late Gen. James Shields certain swords:” Whereas the State of Illinois and the State of South Carolina, after the war with Mexico, each presented to the late Gen. James Shields a sword, in consideration of gallant and meritorious services rendered by him in said war; and Whereas he has left surviving him a widow and three minor children, with but limited means of support, and said swords, though costly and valuable, can not be divided and apportioned between said children, and their value is needed for the education and support of said children: Therefore, Be it enacted, etc., That the Secretary of War be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to purchase of said widow and children said swords, at their actual cost, not to exceed the sum of $10,000, to be paid for out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, and when so purchased the same to be deposited with the other military archives of the nation in some public place at the National Museum. Whereas these swords. were presented forty years ago; and Whereas that presented by the State of Illinois was paid for out of the contingent fund of the governor, of which no record remains in the department of state at Springfield, Ill.; and Whereas the Beh ivss of the State of South Carolina were bamed at Columbia dur- ing the civil war, and no record remains of the amount paid for the sword presented by the State of South Carolina, and no record or authenticated evidence can be obtained; and Whereas tradition says that the sword presented by the State of Illinois cost $3,000, and the one by the State of South Carolina $5,000: Therefore, Resolved, etc., That the Secretary of War be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to construe the words ‘‘at their actual cost’’ in the above-recited act of Congress to mean the sum of $8,000. Referred to Committee on Military Affairs. September 4, 1888—House. Mr. R. W. TownsHEnp, from Committee on Military Affairs, reported favorably. September 25, 1888—House. Mr. C. H. Mansur asked for consideration. Mr. C. B. Kinecore objected, and the resolution went over. REPORT OF SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION. January 16, 1888—House. Mr. 8. 8. Cox introduced a concurrent resolution to print reports of Smithsonian Institution and National Museum for the years 1886 and 1887. Referred to Committee on Printing. January 16, 1888—House. Mr. 8. 8. Cox offered a memorial of the Smithsonian Institution as to printing reports. . Referred to Committee on Printing. 1130 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. January 16, 1888—House. Mr. PornpexterR Dunn. I wish simply to ask a question of the chairman of the Committee on Printing. Iam satisfied there is some delay in printing which is inconveniencing this House, and I wish to ask that gentleman whether the rumor I have heard is true—that the Public Printer has alleged as a reason of the delay that large orders for printing have heretofore been made, and that he feels bound to give those prior orders precedence over the current work of Congress? Mr. J. D. Ricnarpson. I can not answer the gentleman’s question. I know that the Public Printer is engaged in the execution of previous orders. Mr. Dunn. I do not assert that such is the fact; I have heard such a rumor, and if the Printer is exercising his discretion in that way he is perhaps in error, because, certainly, printing connected with the cur- rent business of Congress ought to take priority of everything else. Mr. 8. 8. Cox: I think I can answer my friend from Arkansas [Mr. Dunn]. Asa Regent of the Smithsonian Institution I had occasion to inquire the other day in relation to the Smithsonian report for the year ending June 30,1886. It had not been printed. I found out from the Public Printer that the reason he has not been able to print the report of the Smithsonian Institution and the National Museum for the last two years is that he has been so thoroughly occupied in doing other work, including the current work of Congress. He has never neglected that current work; and by ‘‘current work” we understand bills and reports such as are necessary to assist us in the daily business of legislation. I think I can say, without any hesitation, for the Pub- lic Printer that he never for one moment neglects to assist the House in its business by performing as promptly as possible the ordinary work of his office. Mr. Ricnarpson offered a resolution and asked its immediate con- sideration: That the Committee on Printing be instructed to investigate what amount of delayed work in the shape of public documents of various kinds and of all other matter is in the Government Printing Office which was ordered printed by former laws and now remains unpublished. The committee shall report to the House what documents and other. matter deemed worthless by them are now remaining, and whether, in their opinion, the laws ordering such publication may not be repealed, and shall accompany their report with a bill or joint resolution repealing all laws or sections of laws ordering the publication of documents or other matter which may in their judgment be dispensed with. Agreed to. January 31, 1888—House. Mr. J. A. Hrestanp, from the Committee on Printing, submitted report (H. 207): The Committee on Printing, to whom was referred the House reso- FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. {isl lution authorizing the printing of the report of the Smithsonian Insti- tution and of the National Museum for the years ending June 30, 1886 and 1887, in two octavo volumes for each year, 16,000 extra copies of each, at a cost of $14,949, or so much thereof as may be necessary, report the same with the recommendation that the following concur- rent resolution do pass: That there be printed of the report of the Smithsonian Institution and of the National Museum for the years ending June 30, 1886 and 1887, in two octavo volumes for each year, 16,000 extra copies of each, of which 3,000 copies shall be for the use of the Senate, 6,000 copies for the use of the House of Representatives, and 7,000 copies for the use of the Smithsonian Institution. Committed to Committee of the Whole. July 28, 1888—House. Passed. October 1, 1888—Senate. Mr. C. F. Manpverson, from the Committee on Printing, submitted report (S. 2296), on concurrent resolution to print Smithsonian reports: The Committee on Printing, to whom was referred the above con- current resolution, having considered the same, report it back with the recommendation that it do pass, and that there be printed, in two octavo volumes, 16,000 extra copies of each report for the years 1886 and 1887, of which 3,000 copies shall be for the use of the Senate, 6,000 copies for the use of the House, and 7,000 copies for the use of the Smithsonian Institution. The number of copies provided for in the resolution is about the same number of copies printed in previous years, the number author- ized by the Forty-eighth Congress being 17,960 copies. The cost will be, as per the estimate of the Public Printer, about — $11,000. - Passed. December 7, 1888—House. Mr. S. S. Cox submitted a concurrent resolution: That there be printed of the report of the Smithsonian Institution and of the National Museum for the year ending June 30, 1888, in two octavo volumes, 16,000 extra copies, of which 3,000 copies shall be for the use of the Senate, 6,000 copies for the use of the House of Representatives, and 7,000 copies for the use of the Smithsonian Institution. Referred to Committee on Printing. NATIONAL ART COMMISSION. January 18, 1888—Senate. A pill (S. 1514) introduced by Mr G. F. Hoar. Referred to Committee on the Library. L132 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. February 29, 1888—Senate. Passed with amendment. March 2, 1888—House. Referred to Committee on the Library. NEUMANN’S SILK FLAG. January 317, 1888—Senate. The President pro tempore (Mr. Joun J. Incas) presented the petition of Joseph Neumann, of San Francisco, Cal., praying for the preservation of the flag made of American silk presented by him to the Government and deposited in the Smithsonian Institution. Referred to Committee on the Library. PRIVILEGE OF FLOOR OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. February 18, 1888—House. Letter from the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. February 18, 1888. Hon. 8.8. Cox, House of Representatives, Washington, D. C. Str: My attention has been called to a resolution offered in the House of Repre- sentatives by Mr. Oates, February 6, 1888, and referred to the Committee on Rules, “‘That Rule XXXIV of the House of Representatives be so amended as to admit of the privileges of the floor to the Interstate Commerce Coypmissioners, the Commis- sioners of Agriculture, Pensions, Indian Affairs, Patents, Railroads, Education, Printing and Engraving, and the Public Printer.’’ I venture to suggest that the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution be also included in the list of those entitled to the privileges of the floor of the House of Representatives, and would state in this connection that this courtesy has been accorded by the Senate of the United States. I have the honor to be, your obedient servant, 8. P. Laneuery, Secretary. March 26, 1888—House. Mr. 8S. S. Cox submitted a resolution: That Rule XXXIV of the House of Representatives be amended by inserting after ‘‘foreign ministers,’’ in line 14, ‘‘the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution.”’ Referred to Committee on Rules. STANLEY INDIAN PAINTINGS. March 7, 1888—Senate. . : Mr. THomas W. PALMER submitted a resolution: That the Committee on the Library be, and it is hereby, directed to inquire into the propriety of purchasing from the administratrix of the late John M. Stanley the historical Indian paintings by the said John M. Stanley now in the custody of the Smithsonian Institution. FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1133 March 12, 1888—House. Mr. J. L. CureMan introduced a resolution same as that submitted by Mr. Palmer in Senate, March 7. Referred to Committee on the Library: ‘METHODS OF GOVERNMENT WORK. March 8, 1888—Senate. Mr. F. M. Cocxreti, from Select Committee on ‘‘ Methods of business and work” in the several Government departments, made a report (S. 507). [Extract.] From letter of J. W. Powell, Director of the United States Geolog- ical Survey, to the Secretary of the Interior, August 23, 1887: THE MUSEUM SYSTEM. The production of museum property. * * * Although the building up of a museum is not a function of the Geological Survey, yet considerable collections of rocks, minerals, ores, fossils, ete., are made for purposes of necessary study in the prosecution of the work of the different divi- sions. Such materials are ultimately transferred to the United States National Museum, it being provided by law that all collections made for the Government of the United States, when no longer needed for investigations in progress, shall be deposited there. It should be observed that the collections made by institutions or individuals engaged in investigating the natural resources of a country are of unequal value. There are certain collections, embracing rare and beautiful minerals, the ores of the precious metals, etc., which possess intrinsic value and are readily marketable; and there are certain other materials, embracing well-preserved fossils, typical rocks, ores, minerals, etc., for which there is a demand for educational and museum pur- poses. Of recent years museums, both independent and connected with educational and scientific institutions, have greatly multiplied; there is a constant demand for museum material, and a trade in such material hassprungup. Thus there is a class of museum material which has money value, and it is desirable that a definite system of preserving and accounting for such property shall be followed. But there is another class of material collected by the investigator, comprising rocks, soils, some ores and minerals, and common or ill-preserved fossils, which have no money value, would be worthless in a museum, and are useful only in elaborating the field notes of the geologist or paleontologist. It would manifestly be unwise to preserve such material in the National Museum, and it is accordingly destroyed. Since the collector is best able to judge of the value of his own collection, and will be very unlikely to underestimate it, provision is made for allowing each investigator to select from the material collected in the progress of his work that which shall be permanently preserved. The acquisition, custody, and transfer of collections. The employees of the Survey are provided with printed label blanks, which are filled out and attached to specimens as collected in the field, and a field number is given to each specimen upon the label and in the notebook of the collector. The labels used are appended. 1134 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. FIELD LABELS. UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. Cascade Mountain collection, No. 9-30. Name: Basalt. Remarks: Probably recent. Locality : . Crater Lake, Oregon. Collector: Dutton. Date: January Donor: E. Dut- 1, 1887. ton. Notebook : AS Page: 35, 36. Field label. UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. Notebook “ B.”’ Date: January 1, 1887. Page 30. Locality: San Francisco Mt., Grand Cafion district, Arizona. Collector: E. M. Blank. id Field label. U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY—APPALACHIAN DIVISION. No. 39. Date: January 1, 1887. Locality: 3 miles southwest of Warrenton, Va. Collector: J. B. Wright. U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY.—DIVISION OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS. State or Territory : Colorado. Coll. No. 91. County: Lake. Town or district: Leadville. Mine: ‘Dirty Devil.” Precise locality: 30 feet from pit of shaft “A.” Local designation: Granite. Determined Collected by Emmons, 1887. by Meade. S. F. Emmons, Geologist in Charge. - U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. Yellowstone Park survey. ARNOLD HAGUE, geologist in charge. Field No., 33. Date, October 10, 1887. N. B.,3 B. Page, 21-23. Collected near Upper Geyser basin. Collected by Shuster. FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1135 Sometimes specimens are collected by persons not connected with the Survey, and are transmitted either as gifts or with requests for identification or for more extended information. When it is believed that the public interest will be subserved thereby, all such inquiries are answered as fully as seems to be desirable. If it is requested, the specimens are returned; but if no such request is made, they are either destroyed or, if of sufficient value, labeled by the collaborator by whom they are examined, and thus become Survey property subject to the regulations controlling the collections made by its employees. . The material collected by the specialists employed upon the Survey is of exceedingly diverse value and character; the specific purposes for which it is employed are also diverse; and it is therefore inexpedient to prescribe regulations for the use and dis- position of the material so long as it remains in the hands of the collector. Fre- quently there is no record oi the material produced by the collector, except in his own notebooks, lists, and catalogues, and he is not charged with it upon any of the general records of the Survey. If, however, the material in the possession of an employee has been acquired by gift through the Director, or has been transferred to him by another officer of the Survey for examination, a record of his acquisition of the prop- erty is contained in the correspondence files of the Survey, and he is held accountable for it. Moreover, when the collections are shipped at the expense of the Government they become subjects of record, and their custodians are accountable for them in a general way. , There are three ways in which collectors dispose of their acquisitions: First, if the material is worthless except for immediate study, it is preserved as long as may be required for that purpose and is then destroyed. In this case there is no account of the production and disposition of the naa except in the records of the collector, and in the transportation records if it has been shipped as public property. Second, if the material is of value for museum purposes, if it promises to be useful in subsequent researches, or if for any other reason it is deemed wise to preserve it in the National Museum, it is transferred to that institution by one of the two methods described in a subsequent paragraph; and there isa record of such transfer both in the Geological Survey and in the National Museum. Third, if the maker of the collection is, for any reason, unable to investigate the material in the desired manner, it is transferred, through the Director, to some specialist, generally within but sometimes without the Survey, for the requisite examination; and the material thus becomes a subject of general record in the Survey. The person to whom material is transferred, either from collectors or from outside parties, disposes of it after investigation in one of these ways; but since there is a record of his custody of the material, greater caution is always exercised in disposing of it when so obtained than when it is obtained by collection. There are two modes of transferring material collected in the progress of the work of the Survey to the National Museum: (1) Certain of the collaborators of the Survey are honorary curators of the National Museum, and have charge in the Museum of the classes of objects which, as members of the Survey, they are engaged in investi- gating. When a collaborator has completed his investigation of a specimen or collec- tion; and has prepared, identified, and suitably labeled it, he formally transfers it to the National Museum through the accessions clerk of that institution, and receives from him a Museum number which is inscribed upon the label or labels. The material then becomes the property of the Museum, and is arranged upon the shelves, or in the drawers provided for the purpose. To facilitate such transfer, some of these collab- orators keep in their offices parts of the catalogue of the Museum, upon which there is a duplicate record of the transfer. The principal record of transfer is, however, that of the accessions clerk of the National Museum. (2) When acollaborator of the Survey who is not a curator of the National Museum desires to transfer specimens or collections to that institution, they are prepared, labeled, and packed, a suitable list 1136 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. or catalogue is added, and the whole is transferred to the Museum by means of a for- mal letter addressed to the Director and by him referred to the officers of the Museum. Material so transferred is unpacked, entered into the Museum catalogue, numbered in the Museum series, and arranged for preservation or exhibition in the Museum in accordance with the plans of that institution; and the principal record of the transfer, in which all such collections are credited to the Geological Survey, is kept by the accessions clerk of the Museum. The following officers of the Survey are honorary curators of the National Museum: Name. Function. Division. Museum department. Wee Dalliz:ts Paleontologist..| Cenozoic Division of Invertebrate | IX. Mollusks. Paleontology. C.D. Walcott ..| Paleontologist..| Paleozoic Division of Invertebrate | XII. A. Invertebrates. Paleontology. C. A. White ..-.| Paleontologist..| Meso-Cenozoic Division of Inverte- XII B. Invertebrate fossils. brate Paleontology. | XIII. A. Fossil plants. L. F. Ward ..... Paleontolopist..| Fosstl Plants’ 32. 755 2. 2es isso. shee ae { an 8 XIII. B. Recent plants, F. W. Clarke ...}| Chemist ........ Chemistry and Physics............-.- XIV. Minerals. The work of the Survey is greatly facilitated by the cooperation existing between it and the National Museum. STATUE OF ee DALE OWEN. March 19, 1888—House. Mr. A. P. Hovey introduced a joint resolution (H. 134): That the sum of $15,000, or so much thereof as may be necessary to carry out the object of this resolution, be, and the same is hereby, appropriated, to be paid out of any money in the Treasury of the United States not otherwise appropriated, for the purpose of erecting onthe grounds or in the building of the Smithsonian Institution, in the city of Washington, District of Columbia, under the direction of the Regents of the said Smithsonian Institution, a statue of the late Robert Dale Owen, a distin- guished citizen and statesman of the United States, and one of the principal pro- moters and architects of the building of said Institution. : Referred to Committee on the Library. May 11, 1888—House. Mr. W. A. STAHLNECKER, from the Committee on the Library, sub- mitted a report (H. 2091): James Smithson, a son of the Duke of Northumberland, England, on the 26th of October, 1826, by his last will and testament, bequeathed to the ‘‘ United States of America his property to found at Wash- ington City, under the name of the Smithsonian Institution, an estab- lishment for the increase and diffusion of knowledge among men.” When the bequest was received by the United States, June, 1829, it amounted to a little over $500,000, and was accepted as a trust under an act of Congress. For many years this large sum was in the vaults of the United States or under its control, and several unsuccessful efforts were made in Congress to pass bills to carry the trust into execution. FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1137 In the Twenty-ninth Congress, December 19, 1845, Robert Dale Owen introduced ‘‘a bill to establish the eatcanian ineoanaen for the increase and diffusion of knowledge among men,” which, after long debate and bitter opposition, was to some extent remodeled by a substitute and became a law April 29 [August 10], 1846. The vote in the House on its final passage stood 85 ayes to 76 nays. Mr. Owen was regarded as the champion of the measure, and was appointed chairman of the Board of Regents in July [August], 1846. From the date of his appointment to the completion of the Smith- sonian building he devoted all his time and energy to the organization and completion of the work. Few men could have been found in any country whose talents, edu- cation, and sympathies would have so well qualified them to carry out the munificent bequest of Mr. Smithson. Mr. Owen was a ripe scholar, had traveled much, and was familiar with the best institutions of Europe. He was fond of architecture and was one of the most active members of the Board of Regents in forming the plans for the building. During this period, and growing out of his labors, he published his work on architecture. Robert Dale Owen was distinguished in literature and as a moral and legal reformer. He was chosen by his people to hold many high positions. He was several times a member of the house and senate of Indiana, member of the constitutional convention that formed the present constitution of that State, and a member of this House in the Twenty-ninth Congress. He was subsequently United States minister to, Naples. In private life he was a model of the highest type and a true gen- tleman. He was a man of great and untiring energy, with the cour- age that never shrank from openly avowing his honest convictions. It would be only an act of simple justice to place his statue by the side of that of the illustrious Professor Henry. Your committee recommend that the joint resolution do pass, with the following amendments, viz: In line 9, after the word ‘‘Columbia,” insert ‘‘ to be located;” and in line 13, after the word ‘‘ Institution,” insert: Provided, however, That the expenditure of said money shall be made under and by the direction of the Secretary of the Treasury. INTERNATIONAL EXCHANGES. April 5, 1888—Senate. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Washington, April 4, 1888. Srr: I have the honor to transmit herewith, for the consideration of the Senate, a copy of a note to this Department from the British niinister at this capital, commu- nicating a proposal from the government of the Dominion of Canada for a direct and H. Doc. 732 12 1138 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. immediate exchange of the parliamentary publications of this Government and that of Canada. : I have the honor to be, sir, your obedient servant, T. F. Bayarp. Hon. Joun J. INGALLS, President pro tempore of the Senate. Wasuineton, March 19, 1888. Str: I have the honor to inform you that the Marquis of Salisbury has forwarded to me a report of the privy council of Canada, expressing the desire of that govern- ment to arrange for the interchange of official documents, and his lordship has requested me to communicate with you on the subject. The report statesthat by an arrangement entered into by the library of the Dominion parliament with the Smithsonian Institution copies of public documents are exchanged between them, but that the reports from the United States arrive sometimes two or three years after date, and are therefore practically useless. The United States official publications have aspecial value in the eyesof Canadian public men, and the Dominion government is desirous of obtaining them by a more direct means. They would be glad, therefore, if an arrangement could be made by which they could be furnished with four full sets of the United States official publications through Her Majesty’s legation at Washington, and for the purpose of reciprocating the favor of exchange of official documents with the United States Government, they will direct the ministers of the several departments to furnish copies of every publication issued by them, through Her Majesty’s legation. Trusting that you will kindly submit this proposal to the competent authorities on such matters, I have the honor to be, with the highest consideration, sir, Your most obedient, humble servant, L. 8. SAcKVILLE WEst. Hon. THomas F. Bayarp, etc. Referred to Committee on Printing. December 10, 1888—Senate. The President pro tempore (Mr. Jonn J. InGaAs) laid before the Senate a communication from the Secretary of State, transmitting a note from the minister of Chile, communicating a request of the Speaker of the Chilean Chamber of Deputies for a regular exchange of publications between the legislative bodies of the United States and Chile. Referred to Committee on Printing. December 11, 1888—House. The Speaker (Mr. Jonn G. Cartise) laid before the House a letter from the Secretary of State. (See Senate, Dec. 10, 1888.) Referred to Committee on the Library. ———— ae FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1139 Convention between the United States of America, Belgium, Brazil, Italy, Portugal, Servia, Spain, and Switzerland for the international exchange of official documents, scientific and literary publications, concluded at Brussels, March 15, 1886; ratifi- cation advised by the Senate, June 18, 1888; ratified by the President, July 19, 1888; ratifications exchanged, January 14, 1889; proclaimed, January 15, 1889. January 15, 1889. By THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. A PROCLAMATION. Whereas a convention to establish a system of international ex- changes of the official documents and of the scientific and literary publications of the States adhering thereto, was concluded and signed at Brussels, Belgium, on the 15th day of March, 1886, by the Pleni- potentiaries of the United States of America, Belgium, Brazil, Italy, Portugal, and the Algarves, Servia, Spain and the Swiss Confeder- ation, which convention being in the French language, is word for word as follows: Le Président des Etats-Unis d’Amérique, Sa Majesté le Roi des Belges, Sa Majesté l’Empereur du Brésil, Sa Majesté la Reine Ré- gente d’Espagne, Sa Majesté le Roi d’Italie, Sa Majesté le Roi de Portugal et des Algarves, Sa Ma- jesté le Roi de Serbie, le Conseil Fédéral de la Confédération Suisse, désirant établir sur les bases adop- tées par la Conférence réunie 4 Bruxelles du 10 au 14 Avril 1883, un systeme d’échanges interna- tionaux pour les documents ofli- ciels et pour les publications scientifiques et littéraires de leurs Etats respectifs, ont nommé pour leurs Plénipotentiaires, savoir: Le Président des Etats-Unis d Amérique, Mr. Lambert Tree, Ministre Résident des Etats-Unis d’ Amérique a Bruxelles, Sa Majesté le Roi des Belges, Mr. le Prince de Caraman, Son [Translation.] The President of the United States of America, His Majesty the King of the Belgians, His Majesty the Emperor of Brazil, Her Majesty the Queen Regent of Spain, His Majesty the King of Italy, His Majesty the King of Portugal and of the Algarves, His Majesty the King of Servia, The Federal Council of the Swiss Confederation, desiring to estab- lish, on the bases adopted by the Conference which met at Brus- sels from the 10th to the 14th April, 1883, a system of interna- tional exchanges of the official documents and of the scientific and literary publications of their respective States, have appointed for their Plenipotentiaries, to wit: The President of the United States of America, Mr. Lambert Tree, Minister Resident of the United States of America at Brus- sels, His Majesty the King of the Belgians, The Prince de Caraman, 1140 Ministre des Affaires Etrangéres, et Mr. le Chevalier de Moreau, Son Ministre de P Agriculture, de l’In- dustrie et des Travaux publics, Sa Majesté ’Empereur du Bré- sil, Mr. le Comte de Villeneuve, Son Envoyé Extraordinaire et Ministre Plénipotentiaire prés Sa Majesté le Roi des Belges, Sa Majesté la Reine Régente d’Espagne, Mr. de Tavira, Chargé d’ Affaires ad interim d’Espagne a Bruxelles, Sa Majesté le Roi d’Italie, Mr. le Marquis Maffei, Son Envoyé Extraordinaire et Ministre Pléni- potentiaire prés Sa Majesté le Roi des Belges, Sa Majesté le Roi de Portugal et des Algarves, Mr. le Baron de Sant? Anna, Enyoyé Extraordi- naire et Ministre Plénipotentiaire de Sa Majesté Trés-Fidéle, Sa Majesté le Roi de Serbie, Mr. Marinovitch, Son Envyoyé Ex- traordinaire et Ministre Plénipo- tentiaire prés Sa Majesté le Roi des Belges, Le Conseil Fédéral de la Con- fédération Suisse, Mr. Rivier, Son Plénipotentiaire spécial. Lesquels, aprés s’étre commu- niqué leurs pleins pouvoirs, ‘trouvés en bonne et due forme, sont convenus de articles suivants: ARTICLE I. Il sera établie, dans chacun des Etats contractants, un bureau chargé du service des échanges. CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. His Minister of Foreign Affairs, and the Chevalier de Moreau, His Minister of Agriculture, Industry and Public Works, His Majesty the Emperor of Brazil, The Count de Villeneuve, His Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary near His Majesty the King of the Belgians, Her Majesty the Queen Regent of Spain, Mr. de Tavira, Chargé d’ Affaires ad interim of Spain at Brussels, His Majesty the King of Italy, the Marquis Maffei, His Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plen- ipotentiary near His Majesty the King of the Belgians, His Majesty the King of Portu- gal and of the Algarves, the Baron de Sant? Anna, Enyoy Extraor- dinary and Minister Plenipoten- tiary of His Very Faithful Maj- esty, His Majesty the King of Servia, Mr. Marinovitch, His Envoy Ex- traordinary and Minister Plenipo- tentiary near His Majesty the King of the Belgians, The Federal Council of the Swiss Confederation, Mr. Rivier its special plenipotentiary. Who, after having communi- cated between themselves their full powers, which are found in good and due form, have agreed upon the following Articles: ARTICLE I. There shail be established in each of the contracting States, a bureau charged with the duty of the exchanges. FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. ARTICLE II. Les publications que les Etats contractants s’engagent a échan- ger sont les suivants: 1°. Les documents officiels, par- lementaires et administratifs qui sont livrés 4 la publicité dans le lieu C’origine. 2°. Les ouvrages exécutés par ordre et aux frais des Gouverne- ments. ARTICLE III. Chaque bureau fera imprimer la liste des publications qu’il peut mettre a la disposition des Etats contractants. Cette liste sera corrigée et com- plétée chaque année et adressée réguliérement & tous les bureaux déxchange. ARTICLE FY. Les bureaux d’éxchange s’en- tendront sur le nombre d’exem- plaires qui pourront étre deman- dés et fournis. ARTICLE V. Les envois se feront directe- ment de bureau a bureau. II sera adopté des modéles et des for- mules uniformes pour les borde- reaux du contenu des caisses, ainsi que pour toutes les piéces de correspondance administra- tive, demandes, accusés de récep- tion, ete. ArtIcLE VI. Pour lexpédition 4 l’extérieur, chaque Etat se charge des frais 1141 _Articie II. The publications which the con- tracting States agree to exchange are the following: 1st. The Official documents, parliamentary and administrative, which are published in the coun- try of their origin. 2nd. The works executed by order and at the expense of the Government. ARTICLE ILI. Each bureau shall cause to be printed a list of the publications that it is able to place at the dis- posal of the contracting States. This list shall be corrected and completed each year and regu- larly addressed to all the bureaus of exchange. ARTICLE IV. The bureaus of exchange will arrange between themselves the number of copies which they may be able eventually to demand and furnish. ARTICLE V. The transmissions shall be made directly from bureau to bureau. Uniform models and formulas will be adopted for the memo- randa of the contents of the cases, as well as for all the administra- tive correspondence, requests, ac- knowledgments of reception, etc. ARTICLE VI. For exterior transmissions, each State assumes the expense of 1142 demballage et de port jusqu’ a destination. Toutefois, quand Yexpédition se fera par mer, des arrangements particuliers régle- ront la part de chaque Etat dans les frais de transport. ARTICLE VIL. Les bureaux d’échange servi- ront d’intermédiaires officieux entre les corps savants et les so- ciétés littéraires, scientifiques, &e. des Etats contractants pour la ré- ception et ’envoi de leurs publi- cations. Mais il demuerera bien entendu que, dans ce cas, le rdle des bu- reaux d’échange se bornera a la transmission en franchise des ouvrages échangés et que ces bu- reaux ne prendront aucunement Pinitiative de proroquer )’établis- sement de ces relations. ArticLeE VIII. Ces dispositions ne sont appli- cables qu’aux documents et ouvrages publiés a partir de la date de la présente convention. ARTICLE IX. Les Etats qui n’ont pas pris part a la présente Convention sont admis a y adhérer sur leur de- mande. Cette adhésion sera notifiée par la voie diplomatique, au Gouver- nement belge et par ce gouver- nement a tous les autres Etats signataires. CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. packing and transportation to the place of destination. Neverthe- less when the transmissions shall be made by sea, special arrange- ments will regulate the share of each State in the expense of transportation. ARTICLE VII. The bureaus of exchange will serve, in an officious capacity, as intermediaries between the learn- ed bodies and literary and scien- tific societies, etc. of the contract- ing States for the reception and transmission of their publications. It remains however well under- stood that, in such case, the duty of the bureaus of exchange will be confined to the free transmis- sion of the works exchanged and that these bureaus will not in any manner take the initiative to bring about the establishment of such relations. ARTICLE VIII. These provisions apply only to the documents and works pub- lished after the date of the present Convention. ARTICLE IX. The States which have not taken part in the present Convention are admitted to adhere to it on their request. This adhesion will be notified diplomatically to the Belgian Government and by that Goy- ernment to all the other signatory States. FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. ARTICLE X. La présente Convention sera ratifiée et les ratifications seront échangées a4 Bruxelles aussit6t que faire se pourra. Elle est con- clue pour dix ans, 4 partir du jour de l’échange des ratifications, et elle continuera 4 subsister au dela de ce délai tant que Pun des Gouvernements n’aura pas dé- elaré six mois 4 l’avance quwil y renonce. En foi de quoi, les Plénipoten- tiaires respectifs Pont signée et y ont apposé leurs cachets. Fait 4 Bruxelles, en huit exem- plaires, le 15 Mars 1886. [SEAL] LAMBERT TREE [SEAL] Pr. DE CARAMAN [SEAL] CH’WLIER D. MorREAU [SEAL] CTE. DE VILLENEUVE [sEAL] José Ma. pE Tavira [SEAL] MAFFEI [SEAL] B’on DE Sant’ ANNA [sEAL] I. MarrInovircH [SEAL] ALPHONSE RIVIER 11438 ARTICLE X. The present Convention will be ratified and the ratifications will be exchanged at Brussels, as soon as practicable. It is concluded for ten years, from the day of the exchange of ratifications, and it will remain in force beyond that time, so long as one of the Gov- ernments shall not have declared six months in advance that it re- nounces it. In witness whereof, the re- spective Plenipotentiaries have signed it, and have thereunto af- fixed their seals. Done at Brussels in eight copies the 15th of March, 1886. [L. s.] LamBrert TREE [L. s.] Pr. DE CARAMAN [L. s.] Ca’vw LIER D. Moreau [L. s.] Cre. DE VILLENEUVE [u. s.] José Ma. pe Tavira [u. s.] MAFFEI [L. s.]| Bon DE Sant’ ANNA [L. s.] J. MartnovitcH [L. s.| ALPHONSE RIVIER And whereas the Plenipotentiary of the United States of America did, on the 17th day of November, 1888, deposit the President’s rati- fication of the said Convention with His Excellency the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Belgium, for delivery to the Plenipotentiaries of the other signatory States, on the occasion of their reassembling to exchange the ratifications of the said Convention; And whereas the Plenipotentiaries of the several Contracting Par- ties did, on the 14th day of January, 1889, exchange the ratifications of the said Convention; Now, therefore, be it known that I, Grover Cleveland, President of the United States of America, have caused the said Convention to be made public, to the end that the same and every article and cause thereof may be observed and fulfilled with good faith by the United States and the citizens thereof. In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the United States of America to be affixed. Done at the City of Washington this 15th day of January in the 1144 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and eighty-nine, and of the Independence of the ELIE States the one hundred and thirteenth. [SEAL] GROVER CLEVELAND By the President: T. F. Bayarp Secretary of State. March 1, 1889—Senate. The President pro tempore (Mr. J. J. Ineauus) laid before the Sen- ate a communication from the Secretary of State, transmitting a letter from Professor S. P. Langley, Secretary of the Smithsonian Institu- tion. (Ex. Doc. 139). DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Washington, February 28, 1889. Sir: I have the honor to inclose a copy of a letter from Prof. 8. P. Langley, Secre- tary of the Smithsonian Institution, in reference to the legislative measures necessary for carrying into effect the convention between the United States and Belgium, Brazil, Italy, Portugal, Servia, and Spain for the immediate exchange of public documents, concluded at Brussels, March 15, 1886. The most efficient means for the purpose would seem to be a joint resolution of both Houses of Congress, and I therefore have the honor to suggest the inclosed draft as embodying Professor Langley’s views. I have the honor to be, sir, your obedient servant, T. F. Bayarp. Hon. Joun J. INGALLS, President of the Senate pro tempore. Resolved, etc., That for the purpose of carrying into effect the provisions of the convention between the United States of America, Belgium, Brazil, Italy, Portugal, Servia, and Spain, concluded at Brussels, March 15, 1886, and ratified by the President July 19, 1888, the Public Printer is hereby authorized to supply the inter- national exchange office, with due promptness, a sufficient number of public docu- ments; and that, to meet the additional expense entailed for clerk hire and postage, the sum of $2,000, or so much thereof as may be necessary, be, and the same is hereby, appropriated out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to be expended under the direction of the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, Washington, D. C., February 26, 1889. Srr: In reply to your letter of the 12th instant, inclosing printed copies of the two conventions relative to the international exchange of official and other docu- ments, proclaimed on the 15th ultimo, and inquiring as to the ability of the Smith- sonian Institution to execute all of the provisions of those conventions without further legislation by Congress, I haye the honor to state that the convention first named in your letter does not change the usage now prevailing in the conduct of the exchange with the contracting nations, and that no further legislative action is _ required thereon. For the fulfillment of the obligations incurred by the second convention (for the immediate exchange of official journals, etc.), however, it will be necessary— (1) That the documents referred to be promptly and frequently furnished to the international exchange office; FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1145 (2) That provision be made for the salary of an additional clerk, who shall attend especially to this duty; and ‘ (3) That provision be made for the considerable increase in the cost of postage which will be required. It is difficult to estimate with precision beforehand the cost of a service the extent of which is not yet accurately known. From the best information at hand, however, I incline to the opinion that the additional service, so far as the United States is con- cerned, should not exceed $2,000 a year. I am, sir, very respectfully, yours, S. P. Laney, Secretary. Hon. Tuomas F. Bayarp, Secretary of State. * * * * * * * Referred to Committee on Foreign Relations. March 2, 1889—House. The above communications laid before the House. Referred to Committee on Foreign Affairs. INTERNATIONAL EXCHANGES—ESTIMATES. December 5, 1887—House. Estimates for 1889. For expenses of the system of international exchanges between the United States and foreign countries, under the direction of the Smith- sonian Institution, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $15,000. . June 1, 1888—House. TREASURY DEPARTMENT, May 31, 1888. Sir: I have the honor to transmit herewith, for the consideration of Congress, copy of a communication from the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution of this date, submitting an amended estimate for the expenses of international exchanges, under the direction of said Institution, for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1889, amounting to $27,050. Respectfully, yours, C. 8. FarrcHixp, Secretary. The SPEAKER OF THE Housk or REPRESENTATIVES. SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, Washington, D. C., May 31, 1888. Sir: In the ‘‘ Estimates for Appropriations,’’ page 212, appears the item: ‘* For expenses of the system of international exchanges between the United States and foreign countries, under the direction of the Smithsonian Institution, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $15,000.”’ An investigation made after this first estimate was sent in showed that at this time an amount of matter (virtually presented to the United States) could be secured which would make it of advantage to the Government to appropriate the sum of $27,050. This estimate was to have taken the place of the $15,000, and I learned only yesterday that it has not, as I had supposed, done so. In view of the pressing importance to the interests of the Government and of the fact that the Appropriations Committee of the House is now passing upon these 1146 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. items, I have the honor to request that you will send in the amended estimate, $27,050, at as early a date as possible. I am, sir, very respectfully, yours, 8. P. LANGLEY, Secretary. Hon. CHARLES S. FarRcHILpD, Secretary of the Treasury. Referred to Committee on Appropriations. December 3, 1888—House. Estimates for 1890. For expenses of the system of international exchanges between the United States and foreign countries, under the direction of the Smith- sonian Institution, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $27,500. INTERNATIONAL EXCHANGES—APPROPRIATIONS. July 11, 1888. Legislative, executive, and judicial act for 1889. Library of Congress: For compensation of * * * assistant librarians, * * * eight at $1,400 each, one of whom shall be in charge of international exchanges. * * * * * * * For expenses of exchanging public documents for the publications of foreign governments, $1,500. (Stat., XXV, 262.) (This pays one clerk at $900 and one clerk at $600.) Naval Observatory: For payment to the Smithsonian Institution for freight on Observatory publications sent to foreign countries, $136. (Stat., XXV, 283.) Patent Office: For purchase of books, and expenses of transporting publications of patents issued by the Patent Office to foreign govern- ments, $3,000. (Stat., X XV, 287.) July 28, 1888—Senate. Sundry civil bill for 1889 considered. The next amendment was under the head of ‘*‘ Under the Smithsonian Institution,” on page 68, line 20, to strike out ‘‘ fifteen” and insert ‘*twenty,” so as to make the clause read: International exchanges: For expenses of the system of international exchanges between the United States and foreign countries, under the direction of the Smith- sonian Institution, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $20,000. Agreed to. Mr. J. H. Reaaan. Will the chairman of the committee state the items which make up this $20,000? FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1147 Mr. W. B. Axuison. I can not state them in detail. There are of course a great number of items. The Smithsonian Institution has charge of the entire exchange of our public documents for the public documents of other countries. Of course this includes all services in connection with the exchanges. Mr. Reacan. What I was trying to get at was what part of this appropriation would be for salaries and what part would be for the exchange of public documents and books. Mr. Auuison. I have a memorandum here which discloses the way this money is to be spent: INTERNATIONAL EXCHANGES. Present system established by act of Congress approved March 2, 1867, and sub- sequent legislation. Fifty copies of all Government publications put at disposal of Committee on Library for international exchange. Uniform system agreed upon at international geographical conference, Paris, 1875, and modified by conferences for this particular purpose at Brussels in 1880, 1883, and 1886. Treaty now before Senate is result of these conferences. There is now no completed treaty obligation. England, Germany, and France have declined to ratify the treaty and were not represented at the last conference. The Smithsonian is not concerned with the system otherwise than as the agent of the Government, but has paid a material part of the cost annually from its pri- vate fund. As the office is now organized, the annual expenditure is at the following rates: STC Ee MetePee TONE coho ee ta sexe ne coke tee ou tet ang aa Sne $11, 580. 00 EE RE oOo oii aaa one ane tera a bn auwclnme gh oeeeae 1, 500. 00 Sema ateieiin, cle. (estimated) .. 222.2-2-221-..5-4205- 0h 22 oot oe: 3, 000. 00 16, 080. 00 This means ‘‘slow’’ freight, and for the most part gratuitous on the ocean. The average time for transmission of a parcel to western Europe is now thirty-six days. By ordinary fast freight it could be reduced to sixteen days. Extraordinary delays occur frequently because of the fact that the freight is carried gratuitously. Boxes shipped from Rome, for example, in December last were held in Naples three months by the steamship line because its steamer space was all filled by paying freight. The same thing has occurred frequently on this side of the ocean. As at present organized, the Smithsonian sends out about one-third of the United States Government publications and receives from foreign governments less than one- tenth of their official publications. Very much is thus lost which is of great interest and value to our Government offices. Many of the Executive Departments which wish to use the exchange system are obliged to adopt other measures, at considerably increased cost. Some of them have special appropriations to defray part of the cost of special transmissions by the Smithsonian. The sum estimated for, $27,050, is the result of careful calculation, based upon a comparison of the details of the business for several years back. It is the Secretary’s opinion that it will far more than repay itself by an increased efficiency in the service and by the number of valuable works which it will bring to Congress and the Executive Departments of the Government. (Instance Hydrographic Office, Nautical Almanac, Naval Observatory, and Signal Office; also Bureaus of Education and of Statistics.) 1148 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. The committee, under this statement and a letter from the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, increased the anfount in the bill $5,000 and did not allow them the $27,000 they asked for. Mr. Reacan. I think a criticism of the terms of this item is proper. The language is: International exchanges: For expenses of the system of international exchanges between the United States and foreign countries, under direction of the Smithsonian Institution, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $20,000. It seems to me, if it is necessary that the Government should make appropriations at all for this purpose, that what they are made for should be specified, and not brought in in a lump in this way. For instance, if there is a secretary provided for at $6,000, it ought to be so stated. If there is an assistant secretary at $5,000, the clause ought to say so. Mr. Auuison. I will say to the Senator from Texas that I believe there is no person employed in this work who receives a salary greater than $960. The entire exchange system involves the transfer to the Library of Congress of all the books obtained from abroad. Mr. Reacan. I dislike to be causing delay and perhaps annoyance to the chairman of the Committee on Appropriations, but when he says no person receives more than $960, let me ask if that statement is meant to embrace the Secretary of the association ? Mr. Auuison. The Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution ? Mr. Reacan. Yes, sir. Mr. Atxison. Oh, no; the Secretary is not paid out of this appro- priation. Some years ago Congress directed that the exchanges of books with foreign countries should be under the direction of the Sec- retary of the Smithsonian Institution. Now, it is but fair that the Government of the United States should be at the expense, whatever it may be. Of course those exchanges require more or less clerical service, correspondence, etc., and also require that a careful statement shall be made there and an account kept of all the books that are trans- mitted or are transferred to the Library of Congress, and it is for this service that this appropriation is made. The President pro tempore (Mr. J. J. Incauts). The amendment has been agreed to. October 2, 1888. Sundry civil act for 1889. Geological Survey: For the purchase of necessary books for the library, and the payment for the transmission of public documents through the Smithsonian exchange, $5,000. (Stat., XXV, 527.) For expenses of the system of international exchanges between the United States and foreign countries, under the direction of the Smith- FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1149 sonian Institution, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $15,000. (Stat., X XV, 529.) War Department: For the transportation of reports and maps to foreign countries, through the Smithsonian Institution, $100. (Stat., XXV, 538.) February 26, 1889. Legislative, executive, and judicial act for 1890. Library of Congress: For compensation of * * * assistant libra- rians, * * * eight, at $1,400 each, one of whom shall be in charge of international exchanges. % * * * * * % For expenses of exchanging public documents for the publications of foreign governments, $1,500. (Stat., XXV, 711.) (This pays one clerk at $900 and one clerk at $600.) Naval Observatory: For payment to Smithsonian Institution for freight on Observatory publications sent to foreign countries, $136. (Stat., X XV, 733.) Patent Office: For purchase of books and expenses of transporting publications of patents issued by the Patent Office to foreign govern- ments, $3,000. (Stat., X XV, 737.) March 2, 1889. Sundry civil act for 1890. For expenses of the system of international exchanges between the United States and foreign countries, under the direction of the Smith- sonian Institution, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $15,000. (Stat., XXV, 952.) Geological Survey: For the purchase of necessary books for the library and the payment for the transmission of public documents through the Smithsonian exchange, $5,000. (Stat., X XV, 960.) War Department: For the transportation of reports and maps of foreign countries, through the Smithsonian Institution, $100. (Stat., X XV, 970.) NATIONAL ZOOLOGICAL PARK. April 23, 1888—Senate. Mr. J. B. Brox introduced a bill (S. 2752): Be it enacted, etc., That, in order to establish a zoological park in the District of Columbia, for the adyancement of science and the instruction and recreation of the people, a commission shall be constituted, composed of three persons, namely, the 1150 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Secretary of the Interior, the president of the Board of Commissioners of the Dis- trict of Columbia, and the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, which shall be known and designated as the commission for the establishment of a zoological park. Sec. 2. That the said commission is- hereby authorized and directed to make an inspection of the country along Rock Creek, beginning at the point on that creek where the Woodley road crosses said creek, and extending upward along its course to where said creek is crossed by the Klingle road, and to select irom that district of country such a tract of land, of not more than 100 acres, which shall include a sec- tion of the creek, as said commission shall deem to be suitable and appropriate for a zoological park. Sec. 3. That the said commission shall cause to be made a careful map of said zoological park, showing the location, quantity, and character of each parcel of pri- vate property to be taken for such purpose, with the names of the respective owners inscribed thereon, and the said map shall be filed and recorded in the public records of the District of Columbia; and from and after that date the several tracts and par- cels of land embraced in such zoological park shall be held as condemned for public uses, subject to the payment of just compensation, to be determined by the said com- mission and approved by the President of the United States, provided that such compensation be accepted by the owner or owners of the several parcels of land. Src. 4. That if the said commission shall be unable to purchase any portion of the land so selected and condemned within thirty days after such condemnation, by agreement with the respective owners, at the price approved by the President of the United States, it shall, at the expiration of such period of thirty days, make applica- tion to the supreme court of the District of Columbia, by petition, at a general or special term, for an assessment of the value of such land, and said petition shall con- tain a particular description of the property selected and condemned, with the name of the owner or owners thereof, and his, her, or their residences, as far as the same can be ascertained, together with a copy of the recorded map of the park; and the said court is hereby authorized and required, upon such application, without delay, to notify the owners and occupants of the land and to ascertain and assess the value of the land so selected and condemned by appointing three commissioners to appraise the value or values thereof, and to return the appraisement to the court; and when the values of such land are thus ascertained, said values shall be paid to the owner or owners, and the United States shall be deemed to have a valid title to said lands. Sec. 5. That when the said commission shall haye obtained the land for a zoolog- ical park, as herein provided, it shall have power to lay out the same as a park and to erect such building or buildings thereon as may be necessary for the scientific pur- poses to which the park is dedicated and proper for the custody, care, and exhibi- tion of a collection of animals. ‘ Src. 6. That when the said commission shall have established a zoological park in the District of Columbia under the provisions of this act, by acquiring the necessary lands and by laying out the same as a park and by the erection of the necessary buildings, thereupon it shall be the duty of said commission to turn over the said zoological park, with all its buildings and appurtenances, to the custody and care of the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution; and when such transfer of the custody and care of the zoological park shall be made, the duties of said commission shall cease and its existence terminate. Src. 7. That when the said commission shall tender to the Regents of the Smith- sonian Institution the care and custody of the zoological park provided for in this act, the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution are hereby authorized to assume the care and custody of the same; and the said Regents of the Smithsonian Institution are hereby authorized to make such rules and regulations for the management of the park, and of the property, appurtenances, and collections of the park, as they may FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1151 deem necessary and wise to secure the use of the same for the advancement of science and the instruction and recreation of the people. Sec. 8. That the said commission is hereby authorized to call upon the Director of the Geological Survey to make such surveys as may be necessary to carry into effect the provisions of this act; and the Director of the Geological Survey is hereby authorized and required to make such surveys under the direction of said commission. Src. 9. That for the purpose of carrying into effect the provisions of this act there is hereby appropriated, from any moneys in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, the sum of dollars. Mr. Beck. I ask that the bill be referred to the Committee on Pub- lic Grounds. I do not propose to refer it to the Committee on the District of Columbia, because it provides for the appointment of a commission to be composed of the Secretary of the Interior, the president of the Board of Commissioners of the District of Columbia, and the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, and the friends of the measure believe that the enterprise can succeed better with such a commission than any other. June 4, 1888—Senate. Mr. J. S. Morriu offered, from the Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds, an amendment to the sundry civil bill for 1889. (Same as bill of Mr. J. B. Beck of April 23, 1888.) Referred to Committee on Appropriations. August 28, 1888—Senate. The sundry civil bill for 1889 (H. 10540) being debated, Mr. Wix- L1AM B, ALLison remarked: The next item is the establishment of a zoological park, $200,000. Of course, the House conferees disagree to that. They seem to share rather the view of the Senator from Missouri [Mr. George G. Vest], that if we were to have a zoological garden we ought to have it in the mountains, and inasmuch as we had 60 miles square of ground in the neighborhood of the Yellowstone Park set apart and devoted to the growth of wild animals we had better dedicate a portion of that to a zoological garden. The Senate conferees did not take that view. August 31, 1888—House. Mr. K. Nretson. Mr. Speaker, I move that the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate No. 256, relating to the proposed zoological garden, and agree to the same. At the proper time I wish to be heard on that amendment. September 12, 1888—House. Mr. K. Nretson. I now move that the House concur in the two hun- dred and fifty-sixth amendment of the Senate. Mr. J. H. Buounr. I ask that it be read. The Speaker (Mr. J. G. Caruisyz). The Clerk will report the amendment. * * * * x * . * 1152 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Mr. W. H. Forney. I move that the House insist on its disagree- ment to that amendment. Before the gentleman from Minnesota com- mences I should like to know how much time is proposed to be taken up in debate? Iam willing to consent to. an hour’s debate [cries of | ‘*No!”], and that each side shall have 30 minutes. Mr. Netson. I should like to inquire of the gentleman from Ohio [Mr. Foran] how long a time he wants? Mr. M. A. Foran. Ten minutes. Mr. Netson. Very well, then; I am willing to agree to the debate being limited to one hour, to be equally divided—thirty minutes on each side. The Speaker. Is there objection? There was no objection, and it was ordered accordingly. Mr. W. C. P. Brecxinriper, of Kentucky. I ask, by unanimous consent, to print in the Record a paper prepared on this subject. There was no objection, and it was ordered accordingly. Mr. BreckinripGr, of Kentucky. I do not object to the proposition to limit the debate, but Lask leave to have read the accompanying paper, prepared at my request. My friend, the senior Senator from Kentucky [Mr. Beck], whose enforced absence from this city by rea- son of sickness, took great interest in this project, and this, as well as other reasons, induced me to look into it; and that the House may have the benefit of this paper, I put it into the Record, The paper indicated is as follows: OBJECTS. The object of the zoological park for which this Senate amendment provides is declared to be ‘‘the advancement of science, and the instruction and recreation of the people.’’ Probably no one will deny that the advancement of science and the instruction of the people are objects for the support of which every enlightened gov- ernment is in duty bound to provide. Every zoological garden or park is in the strictest sense an educational institution of a high order, the same as is every museum of science, art, or industry, every marine laboratory and aquarium, and every botanic garden; and one may also add without fear of contradiction every public library. Although the United States is to-day perhaps the wealthiest nation on the earth, and the most prosperous, in comparison with all the nations of Europe, almost with- out exception, we are actually poor in such institutions as those mentioned above. True, we have in some ways made a good beginning, as for instance in the National Museum, the National Library, and a few other similar institutions. But although we have made a good beginning in the higher educational institu- tions—those which must be established and maintained by national aid everywhere— the public is clamorous for more, and, what is more, the public is willing and even anxious to pay for what it asks. Just as breech-loading fire-arms of precision have been invented by the score and manufactured by the hundred thousand, so have the living creatures of our fields and forests disappeared, until now he who would seek to study or even to see repre- sentatives of what were once our commonest quadrupeds and birds must seek them either in museums or zoological gardens. With a fauna that is almost unsurpassed in richness and variety of forms, and boundless resources of every kind, the United — —————————————ooOooeereeerereererererereerrrereree FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1153 States to-day is without a zoological garden, or even the semblance of one. With our quadrupeds and birds both great and small being rapidly swept out of existence, we have as yet taken no steps whatever to preserve a good collection of living speci- mens for the advancement of science and the instruction of the people. NEED. It surely is unnecessary to urge the great desirability and even the necessity that exists for the immediate establishment of such an institution as that contemplated in this Senate amendment; but it is possible that many members of this House, who have been engrossed in other questions of public importance, have not until recently had their attention called to this matter, and it may be as well to briefly direct atten- tion to the reasons for urgency in the consideration of this measure. In the first place, many specimens of our most important and conspicuous North American quad- rupeds are very rapidly approaching extermination. So far as his existence in the wild state is concerned, the great American bison, the grandest and once the most valuable ruminant on the earth, is already considered by naturalists as an extinct animal. In the whole of the British possessions not a single wild buffalo remains. In the whole of the United States, where it is estimated between eight and ten millions existed as late as the building of the Union Pacific Railroad in 1868, only twenty short years ago, there exist to-day not over 125 buffaloes in a wild state. Of these, 50 head, or less, are in northern Texas, and will all be slaughtered by hunters next fall and winter. The remaining 75 head are in the Yellowstone Park, but every year a number of head wander out on the north and west and are promptly killed by the hunters who eagerly watch for them. Six months ago the Government had not a live buffalo anywhere in its possession, nor had any means been taken to provide against the total extermination of the species. It is true that various private parties own captive buffaloes, but the species is in danger of being lost through crossbreed- ing with domestic cattle. The naturalists of this country, and even of England, declare that it is the duty of the National Government to secure a herd of American bison, and preserve it under the best conditions, not only for the public of to-day, but for future generations. But for the wise forethought of the Czar of Russia, exercised many years ago in a similar direction toward the last representatives of the European bison, or aurochs, that spe- cies would have been utterly exterminated long ago. Science and the public demand that the United States Government should do as well by the last representatives of our most characteristic quadruped. Three months ago a New York patron of science, Mr. E. G. Blackford, purchased a pair of buffaloes in Nebraska and presented them to the National Museum, where they may be seen to-day—the only living representa- tives of the species in the possession of the Government. But instead of two only we should have a herd of at least twenty head. It has been predicted by those who are in possession of all the facts that within five years the rare and really wonderful Rocky Mountain goat will also be totally extinct in the United States. At the Cincinnati exposition, in the Smithsonian exhibit, there are now displayed seventy skins of the mountain goat, which were brought into Denver and sold for the paltry sum of 50 cents apiece. And yet this animal exists in so few localities and is really so scarce in numbers that only the largest scientific museums in this country and Europe have even stuffed skins. American naturalists and sportsmen assure us that the elk, moose, antelope, cari- bou, black-tailed deer, grizzly bear, wolf, beaver, otter, wolverine, and many other large quadrupeds that could be named if time permitted, are rapidly approaching extermination. Railroads are being built everywhere, and sportsmen now go every- where in pursuit of every living thing that is large enough to shoot with a gun or H. Doe. 732 73 1154 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. catch with a hook. If we are ever going to bring together a national collection of living creatures to illustrate the animal life of our forests, fields, and waters, it must be done now. Weare permitting all these great animals to be exterminated, just as we permitted the extermination of the buffalo, and if we take no steps to preserve living examples of them—at least in a zoological garden—in the eyes of science, of the public, and the world, we will be inexcusable. THE PLAN. In order to hasten the establishment of a national zoological garden, and to make it immediately possible, three eminent persons, a distinguished Senator from the State which I have the honor in part to represent, the Secretary of the Smithsonian Insti- tution, and the Director of the United States Geological Survey, assisted by the judg- ment of a practical naturalist whose whole life has been spent among animals—these gentlemen, I say, have selected a spot and formulated a plan for the establishment of a zoological park or garden in the District of Columbia. That plan, in the form of this amendment, comes to us from the Senate with the unanimous approval of the Senate itself, the Senate Committee on Appropriations, and also the Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds. It contemplates the appropriation of $200,000 for the purchase of a site of not less than 100 acres, lying in a certain region, the nature of which most of the members of the House are acquainted with, and the balance of $50,000 or $75,000 that will remain after the purchase of the 120 acres desired is to be devoted to improvements. The amendment provides that the purchase of the site and the making of the improvements shall be under the direction of a commis- sion composed of the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, and the president of the Board of District Commissioners. When the park establishment is complete it is to be turned over by the Commissioners to the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, who are empowered to receive it and assume control of it. THE LOCATION AND COST. It is declared by those whose judgment in such matters is worthy of acceptance, that the site selected on Rock Creek, between the crossing of Woodley road and the Klingle road, is incomparably the best that could be found within a radius of 5 miles of the city of Washington, and by its natural features is magnificently adapted to the purpose in view. It has features of beauty and utility possessed by no similar insti- tution in the world. The abundance of water in the stream, and the course of the stream itself, are worth more than $100,000 to any such an institution. The pictur- esque features of valley, hill, slope, and cliff are unrivaled. A large portion of the tract is covered with a fine growth of virgin forest, which affords an abundance of shade, and the drainage is perfect. The maximum estimate of the cost of the site of 121 acres is $142,000, but there is good ground for the belief that this estimate is too high, and that no board of appraisement could reasonably consider the whole tract worth more than an average of $1,000 per acre, or $121,000. By many eventhat is regarded too high an estimate. The ground is owned by seven different parties, but the largest portion of the site desired—55 acres of the Evans estate—has never been in the market. The ground lies sufficiently near the city to render the garden easy of access, which is a very important point. The London Zoo lies in the heart of London, and no one will deny that an accessible location is a matter of prime importance. This site was not chosen until all the Government reservations around Washington had been carefully exam- ined from the Arlington Cemetery around to the Eastern Branch of the Potomac. The Potomac flats were fully considered, but it was believed that while it would be almost impossible to make so low a piece of land a suitable habitation for mountain- FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1155 loving animals, it would also cost four times as much to make it habitable at all as it would cost to purchase the site on Rock Creek. A zoological garden must have dry knolls and well-drained slopes to make it even habitable for wild beasts in rainy weather. It was decided that it would be a serious and costly mistake to locate the gardens on the flats, even though the ground cost nothing in purchase money. The site on Rock Creek is to-day, without the expenditure of a single dollar, a beautiful and picturesque park, with features of loveliness for which the city of New York would gladly pay $1,000,000 were it possible to place them in Central Park by the expenditure of money. It is not too much to assert that the character of the three men who have proposed the plan makes the plan itself stand, like Czesar’s wife, above suspicion. Not one of the promoters of the plan owns a dollar’s worth of property anywhere in that region, nor do any of them expect to own any there. It is the sincere conviction of the dis- tinguished Senator who introduced this measure, and of the other Senators who have by every means in their power facilitated its passage thus far, that it would be a boon to the public, not only of this city but of the whole United States as well, to secure that beautiful spot to the people forever, and establish there a great national zoologi- cal garden to instruct not only the millions of the present but also the millions whica will come after us. COLLECTIONS. It has been proven conclusively by the records of the Department of Living Ani- mals, lately established by the National Museum, that an institution of this kind could and would acquire fully three-quarters of all its collections of American ani- mals by donation. This has actually been the experience of that department during the eight months of its existence. It has made 30 purchases and received 114 gifts, and the cash value of the gifts is declared to be six times as great as the value of all the specimens purchased. As has been proven by the receipt of rare and valuable gifts of live animals from Texas, Kentucky, New York, Alabama, Nebraska, Montana, and Utah, to say nothing of the city of Washington, Virginia, and Maryland, the people of the United States will take unbounded pride in such an institution as it is proposed to establish. Gifts will come pouring in from every direction the moment it is known that a place has been provided for them, that they will be thankfully received, carefully and comfortably cared for, and exhibited under the name of the donor. It is in just this way that all such national collections are kept up. To-day the figures show that the Philadelphia Zoological Garden receives nearly three-fourths of its accessions as gifts. Already the United States Consul at Maracaibo, Venezuela, has written to the Secretary of State and offered to send jaguars, pumas, monkeys, and other objects innumerable to the national zoological garden which he hears is to be established here. Can it be doubted that nearly all our consuls would take pride in doing the same? Can it be doubted that any member’s constituents would rejoice at the establishment here of such a source of national pride, which he feels is free to him and his children forever, because it is partly his own? No one need fear that anyone will find fault with Congress if it appropriates this money. The news- papers of the country, from Boston to New York, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Chicago, and even far away San Francisco, say in so many words, ‘‘Give us a National Zoo! Give it to us before all our great game animals are exterminated.”’ The entire public is certainly behind the measure. There is no opposition to it in any quarter. The Smithsonian has been urged to further the end sought by this amendment. The plan challenges the closest scrutiny and invites criticism, for to know the details of the plan and the public need for this institution is to become an advocate of it. Every great nation on the earth, excepting this, has its national zoological garden, for the advancement of science and the instruction of the people. 1156 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Like the collections of the National Museum, the people, no matter how ignorant of natural history, will feel it is for them, and they will support it accordingly. Under the management provided for in this amendment, no man who votes for this amend- ment will ever regret it. We have lost too much time already in the prosecution of this enterprise; let us delay no longer, but begin at once to build up the grandest collection of American quadrupeds, birds, and reptiles on the face of the earth. Mr. Knute Netson. Mr. Speaker, I do not propose to enter upon any extended discussion of this matter. I think on its face it will commend itself to the favorable consideration of every member of the legislative department of so great a country as that of the United States. This city, sir, ought to be something more than a mere political center, something more than a mere gathering place for statesmen and poli- ticians. The people coming from every part of the country expect at the national capital to see something else than to come into these gal- leries and look down upon members of Congress to see us perform our duties in a listless and perfunctory manner, as we often do. This city ought to be not only the political center, but it ought to be the great art and educational center toward which the attention of our people should be directed. The people of this country, Mr. Speaker, are not endowed with the little and mean spirit some persons suppose. Amongst the great insti- tutions we have established in this city, which are now in successful operation, are the Smithsonian Institution and the National Museum. I venture to say there is not a man or woman who comes to this capital throughout the year who does not visit those institutions to examine carefully the specimens and study the object lessons there presented, and who does not go away satisfied and content that the Government has established those institutions, and who does not cheerfully acqui- esce in the taxation necessary to supply the money to carry them on. All great governments have recognized the fact that such scientific establishments as the National Museum and the Smithsonian Institu- tion and a zoological garden are well calculated to train and educate the people and to cement the nation into one harmonious, intellectual whole. All great countries on the face of the globe have these zoological gardens or institutions of a similar character established in some form or other. There is scarcely one—indeed, I doubt if there is one—that has not already made a beginning in this direction except the United States of America. And now, Mr. Speaker, when we have an abun- dance of money in our national Treasury, when the country is so rich, powerful, and prosperous, can there be any valid reason assigned why we should not inaugurate this establishment, this great scientific instructor that all nations have the benefit of to a greater or less extent? Shall we, claiming a higher grade of civilization than many of the other nations of the world, be the only one which is to deprive FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1157 its people of the lessons to be taught and the education to be obtained from such an establishment as a zoological garden? In addition to this there is another consideration which is pressing upon us at this moment, and which ought to make us anxious to make a beginning in this direction, and it is the fact that many of the unique and peculiar zoological specimens which were once common to this country are fast passing away and very few of them now remain. The time will not be far distant when many species of animals which once existed in vast herds on this continent will be entirely extinct. Let us begin and preserve a few specimens before all are gone. But a dozen years ago I could purchase buffalo robes cheaper at my village home in Minnesota than I could purchase calfskins, while now the buffalo is almost a thing of the past in America; and what is the case with that animal is also the case with a great many other specimens which once roamed this country. Now is the time to gather up the remains of our animals and con- centrate them here, where they can be properly cared for, and become a scientific link between our past and present. It is now or never, Mr. Speaker, I have looked into this matter further, and I find that the proposition is to establish this park on that beautiful little creek in the northwest section of the city known as ‘‘ Rock Creek,” and to take about 120 acres of land for the purpose of this garden. I am satisfied from what I have been able to learn on a personal examina- tion of the matter, for I have taken particular pains to look into it, that there is no real-estate job or speculation connected with it. On the contrary, those people now owning real estate in that immediate neighborhood are averse, as I am informed, to the establishment of a zoological garden in their midst. It is proposed to appropriate about $140,000 to secure the site, and about $50,000 for the preliminary plant and a year’s operating expenses. Mr. E. Payson. I would like to ask the gentleman where he finds that in the bill, or where he finds any limit to the amount of land which is to be acquired? There is no limit whatever on it. Mr. Netson. The limitation is on the amount of the appropriation. Mr. Payson. Yes; but not as to the quantity of land that may be acquired. The bill does not limit them and does not specify the lands. Mr. Newtson. Certainly not. The bill does not go on and describe the lands, because this tract is composed of a multitude of little tracts varying from 6 to 20 acres in extent. They have to secure these sey- eral tracts in order to get the site. Mr. Payson. But my point is this: That this bill provides for an unlimited acquisition of lands in that region, and the minimum amount is fixed in the amendment, which is to be not less than 100 acres, but as much more as these gentlemen choose to incorporate into the tract. Now, if it is to be adopted at all, there ought to be some limit. 1158 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Mr. Netson. I want to say in reply to the gentleman from Illinois that that is a pure matter of detail, and if he thinks that there is any- thing in this which is susceptible of a misconstruction it can be coy- ered by a suitable and proper amendment, which I am perfectly willing to accede to. Mr. D. B. Henperson, of Iowa. The amount fixed in the Senate amendment is 100 acres. Mr. Netson. Yes, sir; and so far as I know the gentlemen with whom I have conversed, and I may say, indeed, about the only gentle- man I have talked with is a man who is interested in this from a purely scientific standpoint—I refer to Mr. Hornaday, of the Smithsonian Institution—informs me that all that is contemplated and all that is desired is 121 acres. It has nothing of the element of speculation about it. It is to establish a zoological garden for the benefit of the great body of our people who visit this city and for no other purpose. Now, by establishing the institution, sir, in this manner, we will make a beginning; and knowing what our experience has been in ref- erence to the Smithsonian Institution, we are safe in saying that a large number of valuable specimens which we are likely to acquire in the future will be given us as a free gift whenever we have the place to put them and take care of them. I urge every gentleman in this Chamber, no matter what his politics may be, as he looks upon the greatness of this country and regards its abilities and resources, vast and unparalleled as they are, under all these circumstances, to join with me to aid in establishing this institution here, and thereby place us on a par with other great countries of the world, and in this manner do what intelligence, civilization, and public spirit has done for all other countries. There are no people in the country, no class of our people, who would begrudge the sum—the few thousands of dollars— necessarily involved in this establishment. This city is the great center which attracts all of our people. They do not feel that anything is too grand for this city or Government. They go away from here often feeling perhaps that with the exception of the Capitol our public buildings, particularly the White House, are most insignificant and incompatible with the high character and dig- nity of the country. They feel that here, in the capital of a great nation, everything should be on the grandest scale, in consonance with the dignity of our nation, and that all that appertains to culture, art, and science ought to have a home and abiding place here on a grand and ample scale, commensurate with our resources, greatness, and dignity as a nation. Mr. W. H. Forney. It is proposed by this amendment of the Senate to establish a zoological park in the District of Columbia by the appropriation of $200,000 at this time. Now, when this $200,000 is expended, what have you got? You simply have 121 acres out here FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1159 on Rock Creek, for which it is proposed to pay $142,000. - In the first place, that is an immense price for that. kind of land. Then, after we have spent $142,000 for the 121 acres of land, there are $58,000 left with which to commence building houses. Next year we will be called upon to appropriate $200,000 to buy buffaloes, tigers, lions, monkeys, and other animals to put in there. The next year after that we will have to appropriate another $200,000, because we will have to buy reptiles, snakes, and things of that kind. So really, Mr. Speaker, it simply means $200,000 this year, and $200,000 a year for the next five years, and then we have a zoological garden. There is a zoological garden in New York and another in Cincinnati. Of course we must rival them, and it will cost $100,000 every year for all time to come. ‘Now, are we ready to commence this business? I say not; and why? Because the Government has no business to enter into this matter until we are out of debt, and if the gentleman will postpone this measure until 1907, when we have paid our debt, I will join in the business. - I now yield to the gentleman from Alabama [Mr. Herbert. |* Mr. J. G. Cannon. Mr. Speaker, I doubt the wisdom of providing for this expenditure at the present time. I have no hesitation about the right and expediency, at the proper time and in a proper way, of improving the parks about our cities and establishing, at proper places and under proper safeguards, zoological gardens. In nearly all of our great cities you find them. Since this measure has been pending I got on my horse and went up Rock Creek road along the northern and the southern boundary of the proposed zoological garden. I went along the creek, and, as nearly as I could, found the boundary of that pro- posed park. Nature has done a great deal for that location; and I am very frank to say that I hope to live a good many years after the zoological garden shall have been established there or at some other good point; and I doubt whether any better location can be found any where. Yet I am frank to say I do not favor this measure at this time, because we are not ready. I believe the time is near at hand when there ought to be a park established, commencing at Massachusetts avenue and running a considerable distance north of the proposed northern boundary of this garden; and in that park ought to be placed, I believe, the zoological garden. It may be, and I think it quite likely, that a portion of the expense of this park proper ought to be borne by the District of Columbia; but whether that shall be done or not, we are not ready at this time to establish the park; 1 mean as disconnected with the zoological garden. If you establish the garden there now, and the Government begins to spend money upon it, my opinion is that the cost for the land north 'The remarks then made by Mr. Hiliary A. Herbert were held over for revision, but were never recorded. 1160 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. and south of it for a park proper would be very greatly increased, I think it wise, therefore, to let this matter go over until the next session of Congress; and in the mean time let the Committee on Appro- priations, if you choose, or the Committee on the District of Colum- bia, or both committees, as well as members generally, look into this subject. Mr. W. P. TautBer. Would it disturb the gentleman if I should ask him a question ? Mr. Cannon. Not at all. Mr. Tavuipes. If I understand the gentleman, his position is that the District of Columbia ought to pay half the expense of this park, while the Government acquires the title tothe property. Now, if the District of Columbia is to pay half of the expense, is it not right under the present system of taking care of the parks of this city and of dividing the general expenses of the city, that the title should be vested in the District of Columbia? If the Government owns the property, why require the District of Columbia to pay half the expense ? Mr. Cannon. The Government does not own the property. Mr. TaviBer. I understood that was the purpose. Mr. Cannon. That is a matter for adjustment in the future. The Government of the United States may pay all the expense, or the District of Columbia pay one-half; that would depend upon the pro- visions of the law which may be passed at the time we acquire the park. It may be that the District of Columbia ought not to pay any- thing, so far as the zoological garden is concerned. But my particular objection to this provision at the present time is that, after having gone over that portion of the District and examined it pretty closely, the impression rests strongly on my mind that we ought to have not only the ground proposed, but north of it a consid- erable distance—a mile or two—and south of it to Massachusetts ave- nue for a general park, in which this garden ought to be located. Mr. TautBeer. That is the same plan, I believe, which was consid- ered some weeks ago in the time belonging to the District of Colum- bia, when we had a bill before us proposing to establish a park. Mr. Cannon. I do not say that I approve of that plan at all. I say generally that I approve of acquiring this land for that purpose. [Here the hammer fell. ] Mr. Foran. Mr. Speaker, I am sorry to differ on this question with some of my colleagues on the Committee on Appropriations. The gentleman from Alabama [Mr. Forney] is usually right, although somewhat possessed of a parsimonious spirit in respect to public expenditures, as is the gentleman from Alabama [Mr. Herbert]. The gentleman from Alabama [Mr. Forney], when he says that the adop- tion of this amendment will involve an annual expenditure of $100,000, draws largely, I think, on his imagination. FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1161 Mr. Forney. I will ask the gentleman whether he understands what is the cost of maintaining the parks in New York and other large cities ? I understand that in New York the expense is $50,000; and of course we shall have to go ahead of New York. Mr. Foran. Fifty thousand dollars! I do not care whether the zoo- logical garden in New York costs $50,000 or $500,000 or $5,000,000. Mr. Forney. That is the right way to meet the question. Mr. Foran. ‘That park, the Central Park in the city of New York, is the institution which above all others attracts the attention and admi- ration of visitors. It is the one bright spot, the great oasis in the des- ert of misery and selfishness known as New York. And so, too, when a person visits Philadelphia the first place he is likely to go to is the zoological garden. The same is true in respect to Cincinnati. Mr. Speaker, I think I know something as well as other gentlemen about public opinion in respect to expenditures of the public money, and I wish to say right here that when we go upon the political plat- form this fall to discuss political questions before the people we shall not be asked about the expenditures of the public money as much as we shall be interrogated in regard to other questions. I have made many a canvass, and I know that the people of the United States are not so much concerned about the amount of public expenditures, if they are properly expended, as they are about other great and leading issues. Of course, when public moneys are improperly expended, when there is peculation and fraud, the people have a right to com- plain, but the expenditure of the public money for scientific and other useful purposes has never been complained of by the people. Espe- cially is this true when money is appropriated and expended for the benefit, the education, and the edification of the people. Money expended for public parks and botanical and zoological gardens, where the poor, who can not afford these luxuries as the wealthy can, may breathe fresh air, enhance their health, and improve their minds, is never condemned, but is always commended and appreciated by those who pay taxes, for these parks are the recreation grounds of the poor. Why, sir, the people of the Old World have for years and centuries encouraged art and science. Hence you find there a Humboldt, an Agassiz, a Muncaczy, and a Meissonier. But you do not find such men in this country, and you will not until our public men rise to the height they should and encourage art and science in this country. The hard, sharp struggle for existence keeps many of the brightest minds in the Republic chained to the bench or the desk. With proper encouragement our artists, scientists, and naturalists would become shining stars in the great galaxy of human science and genius. I am strongly in favor, Mr. Speaker, of a zoological garden in this city or some other place under the control of the United States. The sciences of biology and biogenesis are attracting wide attention at this 1162 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. time, and that part of biology which embraces zoology, the structure, habits, distribution, classification, and derivation of animals receives the most earnest consideration of scientific men everywhere. There is in Paris the Jardin des Plantes, which has been the nursery and educator of naturalists for hundreds of years. They have in Regent’s Park, London, a great zoological garden, which has over 5,000 ani- mals in it to-day, and although it is an admission garden more people visit it than visit any other quarter of London or England. It is the haunt of the poor, the woman and child as well as the man, the haunt of the naturalist, the scientist, the traveler—the pride and the glory of the British metropolis. And why should we not have such a garden? We proudly boast of our greatness, our prosperity, our intelligence asa people. Let us show by our acts, our encouragement to art and science, that we are worthy of the distinction we claim. Look at this city to-day. Has the United States encouraged art, even in so meager a way as to provide fora national art gallery? No, sir. If it were not for the munificence and generosity of one man— I refer to the late lamented Mr. Corcoran—the capital of the United States would not have a single work of art free to the student, the people—all who love and admire the beautiful and the artistic. Thank God, there was one man who recognized that property was not an individual fact, but the creation of social agencies, and, recognizing his duty to society, this great and good man gave to the people the Corcoran Art Gallery. He recognized a principle that wealthy men do not recognize generally. Were it not for the generosity of that one man the visitor to this city to-day could find no place where might be seen specimens of the art of this and other countries, this and past ages. It has been well said by the gentleman from Minnesota | Mr. Nelson] that a great many of the animals which were found in this country are fast becoming extinct—such as the buffalo, the caribou, the Rocky Mountain goat, the moose, and other species. Are these animals, this part of our natural history, to be blotted out and lost forever? Must future generations know of them only by seeing their remains or by reading what naturalists say of them? The science of zoology is closely related to the cognate sciences of biology and anthropology and ethnology, and all questions relating to human life and life itself. They are all of vast and unbounded inter- est to science and to everybody. I know myself from practical expe- rience how interested the people generally are in all that relates to animal life—to the fauna of this as well as other countries. A small park in the city of Cleveland has recently had donated to it a little alligator, a very small specimen, from the region of my friend from Alabama. This saurian has heid levees, matinees, and noon-day recep- tions all summer, and has had more visitors than any other attractions FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1168 in the city of Cleveland. His audiences number hundreds of thou- sands. Man has a peculiar interest in all living things. The animals of a circus have ever had more interest for the youth than the contor- tions of the clown. Thestudy of life always has, and always will have, a fascinating interest for the human mind, and where can lower forms of life be better studied than in zoological gardens ? It is something we need in this city, and the expenditure of $200,000 in a matter of this kind is a mere bagatelle compared with its necessity and its usefulness for the advancement of science. I do not care if it does cost $50,000 or a $100,000 next year, although there is no warrant for that assumption. You have to-day a National Museum, with a large ethnological collection, in this city, and with a large collection of the fauna and flora of the country. As you have gone that far, why not in addition have a zoological garden ? I understand that in the Smithsonian Institution or the National Museum there are fifty or a hundred animals already, donated by men interested in the zoological geography of the country. Instead of having to pay for the animals for this park they will be donated by persons from all parts of the United States, because there are large- hearted and generous men in the United States everywhere who are anxious to enrich and perpetuate this science. Until recently our knowledge of extinct animals was so very limited that the science hardly deserved the name, but within a few years the discovery of extinct fossil remains has enabled the scientist, by an examination of these records of past ages, to solve many mysteries, not only of rela- tion, but of structure as well. In this research dwarfed organs have been found in full development and widely separated forms linked together. The zoology of the future will include the past as well as the present. It is already a most wonderful as well as a most useful science, and it is to stimulate and advance it that this measure is pro- posed. All scientists now agree that the germ of life, the bioplasm, the clay from which the Great Potter molds living beings, is identic- ally the same in all animals, man included. It is for this reason that the study of life, its origin, its purpose, its existence has so great an interest to the human mind. Therefore I say, Mr. Speaker, that the expenditure of this money will be productive of great and lasting benefit to science. | Let me say, in conclusion, that the people do not scan too closely the expenditures of money out of the Treasury provided it is ex- pended for their benefit. Persons coming to this city and seeing this magnificent structure, the Capitol of the United States, are not filled with envy because it is located in Washington. It is the nation’s building, and each citizen has a part in it. As the visitors go through the beautiful grounds of the Botanic Garden or through the National Museum and the Smithsonian Institution they are conscious these 1164 OONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. institutions belong to them as well as to the people of Washington. You have a National Observatory here, too. It is national in its char- acter and belongs to the whole country. This zoological garden will belong not to this city alone, but to the whole United States. It will be a place where every resident, every sojourner, and visitor will delight to go, for there will be found types of all living animals in our zoological geography, as well as specimens of the remains of all extinct fauna found in the same zone. Animals and specimens of fauna from other countries will also be found there. It will be a great national educator, and I am heartily in favor of it. Mr. Forney. I yield now to the gentleman from Missouri [Mr. Bland]. Mr. R. P. Buanp. Mr. Speaker, I think my friend from Alabama has not made a very good comparison when he compared this appro- priation with the one which has just been made in another bill... The object of that was to subserve the interests of the great mass of the people. It was an antimonopoly measure, to prevent certain things from going into the hands of monopoly, in aid of which there was an expenditure of the money of the people. But here is an aristocratic measure, just the reverse of that, intended to beautify and adorn pri- vate property and enhance the value of real estate in the city of Washington at the public expense. While it is doing so it fails to provide that these private individuals shall contribute one cent to the expense of it. . Now, if the States throughout the country have established the parks for their own adornment, use, and benefit, let the city of Washington do the same, and if the people here want to go into the show business, let them do so at their own expense. So far as the people of this country are concerned, they are quite willing, if left to themselves, in a proper manner to provide parks and adornments for their own cities and the capitals of the States; but it is not right and proper to tax, for the purpose of ‘‘ bulling” the real-estate market of the city of Wash- ington, the people of this country; and that is all this does. Why, Mr. Speaker, if gentlemen want to study this science, and the habits of monkeys, bears, and elephants, I suppose it would be better to go into the country where they are grown and reared, and study their habits in their native homes. But to bring them here for ‘*scientific” purposes is not a proper use of the word. It is not in the interest of science in any manner, but simply in the interest of , curiosity; and hundreds of the people of my State would prefer, if this circus is to be inaugurated, that it shall be carried around; and that if it is for their benefit, and for the benefit of their science, that it shall be put on wheels. Let us organize it in that way. I believe the gentleman from Texas has an amendment to that effect. Let us organize the menagerie, appoint the clown, get all the actors, and visit FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1165 all the States and capitals of the country, and give the people the benefit, as they have to foot the bill for the performance, and not restrict it alone to the city of Washington. I am opposed to the amendment and to all appropriations of the public money that go simply to the benefit of the rich and aristocratic classes; and I repeat if they desire the menagerie here, and the estab- lishment of a zoological garden for the benefit of the people of the city of Washington, let them foot the bill. The people of this country ought not to be expected to do it. Mr. Netson. Has the time in opposition been exhausted 4 The Speaker. There are seven minutes remaining to the gentleman from Alabama, and twelve minutes to the gentleman from Minnesota. Mr. Netson. I propose to close the debate, and I hope the gentle- man from Alabama will exhaust the time on that side. Mr. D. Kerr. I would like a minute or two. Mr. Forney. On which side? Mr. Kerr. On your side. Mr. Forney. I yield two minutes to the gentleman. Mr. Kerr. Mr. Speaker, I do not think that we ought to appro- priate the public money for any such purpose. There are certain pur- poses connected with the administration of the Government in the District of Columbia in which it is necessary for us to appropriate money and incidentally thereby to improve the city. This necessarily results in large benefit to the city; but I do not see why the city of Washington ought not to be left to provide its own zoological garden if it desires one. There is not one boy or man in five hundred through- out this country that ever comes here, or will come and get any benefit from the establishment of the garden here, and for that reason I do not think the public money ought to be appropriated for any such purpose. * * * * * * * Mr. Forney. I yield now to the gentleman from Georgia [Mr. Blount]. Mr. Jas. H. Buounr. Mr. Speaker, I do not rise to go into the gen- eral discussion of the pending matter, but to call attention to one sin- gle fact, one paragraph of this amendment [to the sundry civil bill for 1890], and that is: That the said commission is hereby authorized and directed to make an inspection of the country along Rock Creek, beginning at the point on that creek where the Woodley road crosses said creek, and extending upward along its course to where said creek is crossed by the Klingle road, and to select from that district of country such a tract of land, of not less than 100 acres, which shall include a section of the creek, as said commission shall deem to be suitable and appropriate for a zoological park. There never happens a time, sir, when the Government of the United States needs land for any purpose that the land it owns or is in pos- 1166 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. session of is suitable for it. While we have vast areas in reserve, whenever a public building is to be located for governmental purposes the sites owned by the Government are never found to be suitable. We are now expending vast sums of money which will run up into millions of dollars along the river front here in what is known as the Potomac flats improvement. More than 700 acres of land, we have been told, are to be reclaimed, and yet under the provisions of this very bill, true to the instincts that seem to prompt all efforts on the part of certain persons to bring about expenditures of the public money here, they go away from that vast area of reclaimed and reclaimable land and provide for the purchase of a particular body of land for this garden. If there was nothing else in this bill but that, it is enough to cause this House to stop and say we will not load down appropria- tion bills with all manner of schemes merely under the semblance of promoting science, when a little examination is well calculated to excite the suspicion, at least, that it is nothing more than a grand raid upon the public Treasury. Out on the grounds of Rock Creek we are to buy 100 acres of land at a cost of you do not know what, and at the very same instant you are expending millions of dollars in the reclamation of the Potomac flats, in extent about 700 acres. I say, sir, that we have always found when we have sought to sell lands of the Government they were always val- uable until the Government come into possession of them; but having got into possession then the lands were utterly useless for another purpose. We have now some hundreds of acres, perhaps—certainly we will have before we shall have concluded the reclamation of the Potomac flats. Will any gentleman undertake to say that when they shall have been reclaimed that land may not be utilized; and could not a part of it that has been reclaimed be utilized for that purpose? May we not delay this matter until such time as it could be done? I trust, sir, that there is no occasion for any alarm about not having this zoological garden now. Mr. Benton McMrturn. Does my friend think it will be advisable to establish a bear garden there after we have the land? Mr. Buountr. I do not care to go into a bear garden at all. Mr. McMixur. It does not seem to be advisable. Mr. Buount. I do not think I have any zeal about purchasing the buffaloes and reptiles that my friend from Alabama [Mr. Forney] spoke of having to put in there. It may become necessary [Here the hammer fell. | The Speaker. The time of the gentleman has expired. Mr. Newson. Has the time allotted to those opposed to this amend- ment expired ? The Speaker. It has. Mr, Netson. I yield to the gentleman from Iowa. FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1167 Mr. D. B. Henprerson, of Iowa. My first impressions were decidedly against this measure, for the reason that I entertained some fear that it was a real-estate speculation, and I have taken some interest while I have been in Congress in endeavoring to keep out legislation in the interest of real-estate speculators. When we had the officers of the Smithsonian Institution before us in regard to this matter I took pains to probe this question carefully, and satisfied myself that instead of real-estate men being in favor of this zoological garden they are against it. Men owning real estate in that vicinity do not care to have their property condemned and the title taken from them and given to the Government. Condemnation juries do not always give verdicts to suit real-estate owners, especially when they have a strong public sentiment back of the movement, and favoring reasonable compensation. Let this park be established, and real estate will tumble in the vicinity. The specu- Jators desire residences built, and not parks for animals. The truth is, I found out that the owners of real estate are against this movement. They want fancy and fictitious prices for their prop- erty, and not prices fixed by a jury of the people. On that point my mind is at rest. : Now, then, as to the cost of this matter. Mr. Hornaday, of the Smith- sonian Institution, who has given this matter a very great deal of attention, has urged this matter upon our attention. He is a man of established reputation and high character and ability, who is interested in the question from high-minded, patriotic motives. He has studied the habits of animals of this country, after having first taken an initia- tion of between two and three years in the African jungles. He is also a close student of the character and habits of our own American animals. They of the Smithsonian prepared careful estimates of what it would cost to buy this 121 acres, and they estimated that it would not exceed $142,000. They took the advice of real-estate agents, among them Mr. Fisher, whom most gentlemen here know by reputation, and he says it could not cost more than $140,000. One hundred and forty-two thousand dollars is the outside estimate. I think when the jury get hold of this estimate they will cut them out of some of that even. The annual cost is estimated by the officers of the Smithsonian Institution at $50,000 a year at present. This is to include maintenance, salaries of employees, improvements in buildings, for the construction of yards, cages, and all that sort of thing. That is a cost that will obtain for a few years until this place shall have been established. After that the annual cost, it is estimated, will not exceed thirty-five or forty thousand dollars. So far as the estimate of the cost is concerned, let me remark in passing—-what most gentlemen are familiar with—that the Smith- sonian Institute has never involved the Government in a deficit. The 1168 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. officers there are careful, prudent men, and know at all times what they are talking about. Now, as to the views of my colleague [Mr. Cannon] that it ought to go over to another Congress, it must be borne in mind if we are to have a zoolgical garden, where every animal of this country is to be gathered, it is time we were moving. Already a large number of animals that were indigenous to this coun- try have passed away. The buffalo is almost a creature of the past; and if it is desirable to have such places, and if we are to preserve all these curiosities in this country, I think it is time we were moving in it. Besides, a year or two of delay will see the land contemplated for it cut up and largely occupied as residences, and we will then be too late. The objection is made that we are going into the ‘‘ show business.” That kind of remark, sometimes coupled with a sneer—I do not say that it has been so in this debate—can be urged against the Medical Museum, the National Museum, and public parks and gardens every- where; but it will not do to make that an argument in a case like this. Mr. Speaker, this is a democratic movement. It is a movement in the interest of the masses of the people. He who favors parks, where the people can take recreation and come in contact with nature; he who favors public libraries, where the masses of the people can acquire knowledge, is taking an advanced stand in the interest of the masses. But some gentlemen say that this garden should not be established at Washington; that it should be in the National Park. Gentlemen, you will find that a very large number of your constituents will from year to year visit the national capital, while very few of them, compara- tively, will ever go to the National Park. Besides, I am opposed to sending this garden to the National Park. That institution is practi- cally owned now by a great hotel monopoly. That great National Park is owned and controlled practically by one corporation, and I understand that there is now a bill in this House to put the rivets into it and fasten it as an attachment to that corporation. Mr. Speaker, let this garden be established at this great national center, where with our increasing railroad facilities more and more of our citizens will visit it every year, for there is no nation in the world whose people move about their country as ours do. More of our people will get the benefit of this garden in Washington than at any other point where it could be located. In connection with this discussion let it not be forgotten that this is a proposition which has been introduced into Congress by Senator Beck, a patriotic citizen, a man conservative in thought and in legislation, a man whom no mem- ber of this Congress will charge with being extravagant or favoring real-estate speculations. Let it be borne in mind also that the scien- tific men of this country stand back of this bill, urging it upon the consideration of Congress. Not only that, but the great agricultural -FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1169 journals and the leading journals of this nation have urged upon us to pass this bill establishing a zoological garden. The sentiment of the country is back of this proposition. It is not designed for the benefit of the citizens of Washington, though I am perfectly willing that they, as a respected part of our people and entitled to every advantage of other citizens, shall have all the advan- tage which they can derive from it. This garden is demanded as an educator, as a preserver of elements of education and interest that are passing away like the morning mist, and will soon pass away entirely unless preserved by intelligent leeidlative action. Mr. Speaker, I have said all that I desire to urge upon the House in connection with this subject and I now yield back my remaining time to the gentleman from Minnesota [Mr. Nelson]. Mr. Neuson. I yield that time to the gentleman from New York [Mr. Baker]. Mr. Cuarues S. Baker, of New York. Mr. Speaker, it seems to me that the argument in favor of this proposition is very tersely stated by a Democratic newspaper, the Boston Globe, of Saturday last, and I propose to read as part of my remarks its article on the subject. It is as follows: ce 7 TIME FOR A NATIONAL ZOO. Senator Beck’s bill to establish a national zoological garden at Washington is still pending. It ought to pass at the present session of Congress. This is the only great nation in the world that does not possess such.an institution. And of all the nations this is the one that needs it most. In no other country are the native wild animals becoming so rapidly extinct. Only a few years ago the great Western plains were black with bison; now that huge animal is a curiosity even to the dwellers on the plains. -A thousand other varieties and species are being exterminated with equal rapidity. If the children of the coming generations are to know anything of the kind of animals that once roamed over the United States, except from books, something like what Senator Betk’s bill contemplates must be done at once. The price of land in Washington, already enormous, is rapidly rising, and for that reason, if no other, delay will be costly. At present land can be had for the purpose at a reasonable price, but every month adds to its value. At a cost that would be trifling compared with the benefits to be derived Con- gress might give the country the largest and most interesting collection of live animals in the world. The primary object of the proposed ‘‘zoo’’ should be to preserve perfect specimens of American animals; but there is no reason why the wild denizens of Asiatic jungles and South American forests should not have a department to themselves. The ‘‘national zoo”’ is a good object on which Democrats and Republicans can unite for the credit of their common country. Congress ought to give it to us, and any person in private life can help secure the ‘‘zoo’”’ by writing to request his Congressman to vote for Senator Beck’s bill. Now, Mr. Speaker, this is one of the few wise Democratic proposi- tions that have been brought before this Congress. My worthy friend from Alabama [Mr. Herbert] suggests, and I think very H. Doc. 732 74 1170 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. properly, that he is opposed to taxing the many for the benefit of the few. I agree with him, and for once we stand together on a common platform. But, Mr. Speaker, it is as an educator of the peo- ple that this institution is desired. Like the Smithsonian Institution, like the National Museum, like the many statues that decorate the parks and streets of Washington, this garden will educate the people, will teach them to love their country, to take an interest in the products of their country, and for that reason I think it is a very proper thing to be created and maintained by the General Government. I am thoroughly in favor of the proposition. Whether the garden shall be located at the point proposed or not I do not care particularly; but at some proper place within the District of Columbia such an institution ought to be established and maintained. The argument of the gentle- man from Alabama [Mr. Herbert], if it is good against this, is equally forcible against all the institutions that are maintained now at the public expense, such as those which have been enumerated by my friend from Jowa [Mr. Henderson]. We have here, moreover, the talent, the knowledge, and the energy of Mr. Hornaday, which are to be given to this garden if it is established. I have known him for many years, and I know that he possesses intelligence, experience, and capacity that would be very valuable in connection with an insti- tution of this kind. The SpraKker. The time of the gentleman has expired. The ques- tion is on the motion that the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment and agree to the same. The question was taken; and there were—ayes, 36; noes, 56. So the motion was not agreed to. Mr. Forney. I move that the House insist upon its disagreement. The motion was agreed to. Mr. Forney. I now move that the House agree to the further con- ference requested by the Senate. The motion was agreed to. December 17, 1888—House. Mr. W. C. P. BreckryripeGr, of Kentucky, introduced a bill (H. 11810), the same as bill (S. 2752), introduced by Mr. J. B. Beck in the Senate, April 23, 1888, with the following change in section 2: ‘‘ of not Jess than 100 acres.” Referred to Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds. December 21, 1888—Senate. Mr. Justin S$. Morrixy introduced a bill (8. 3757) for the estab- lishment of a zoological park in the District of Columbia; same as introduced in House by Mr. W. C. P. Breckinridge, of Kentucky (H. 11810), December 17, 1888. January 16, 1889—Senate. Mr. J. S. Morritt, from Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds, offered the following amendments to sundry civil bill for FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1171 1890; same as introduced by Mr. W. C. P. Breckinridge in House, December 17, 1888 (H. 11810), with the following exceptions: Src. 6. That when the said commission shall have established a zoological park in the District of Columbia under the provisions of this section, by acquiring the neces- sary lands and by laying out the same as a park and by the erection of the necessary buildings thereupon, it shall be the duty of said commission to turn over the said zoological park, with all its buildings and appurtenances, to the custody and care of the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution; and when such transfer of the custody and care of the zoological park shall be made, the duties of said commission shall cease and its existence terminate. Sec. 7. That when the said commission shall tender to the Regents of the Smith- sonian Institution the care and custody of the zoological park provided for herein, the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution are hereby authorized to assume the care and custody of the same; and the said Regents of the Smithsonian Institution are hereby authorized to make such rules and regulations for the management of the park, and of the property, appurtenances, and collections of the park, as they may deem necessary and wise to secure the use of the same for the advancement of science and the instruction and recreation of the people. Sec. 8. That the said commission is hereby authorized to call upon the Superin- tendent of the Coast and Geodetic Survey, or the Director of the Geological Survey to make such surveys as may be necessary to carry into effect the provisions of this section; and the said officers are hereby authorized and required to make such sur- veys under the direction of said commission. January 25, 1889—Senate. The sundry civil bill for 1890 under consideration. Mr. G. F. Epmunps. Now, I offer an amendment which has been reported from the Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds and referred to the Committee on Appropriations. The Secretary. It is proposed to add to the bill the following addi- tional section [the same as introduced by Mr. W. C. P. Breckinridge on December 17, 1888]: Src. —. For the establishment of a zoological park in the District of Columbia, $200,000, to be expended under and in accordance with the provisions following, that is to say: That in order to establish a zoological park in the District of Columbia, for the advancement of science and the instruction and recreation of the people, a commis- sion shall be constituted, composed of three persons, namely, the Secretary of the Interior, the president of the Board of Commissioners of the District of Columbia, and the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, which shall be known and desig- nated as the commission for the establishment of a zoological park. That the said commission is hereby authorized and directed to make an inspection of the country along Rock Creek, between Massachusetts avenue extended and where said creek is crossed by the road leading west from Brightwood crosses said creek, and to’select from that district of country such a tract of land, of not less than 100 acres, which shall include a section of the creek, as said commission shall deem to be suitable and appropriate for a zoological park. That the said commission shall cause to be made a careful map of said zoological park, showing the location, quantity, and character of each parcel of private property to be taken for such purpose, with the names of the respective owners inscribed thereon, and the said map shall be filed and recorded in the public records of the District of Columbia; and from and after that date the several tracts and parcels of ite CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. land embraced in such zoological park shall be held as condemned for public uses, subject to the payment of just compensation, to be determined by the said commis- sion and approved by the President of the United States, provided that such com- pensation be accepted by the owner or owners of the several parcels of land. That if the said commission shall be unable to purchase any portion of the land so selected and condemned within thirty days after such condemnation, by agreement with the respective owners, at the price approved by the President of the United States, it shall, at the expiration of such period of thirty days, make application to the supreme court of the District of Columbia, by petition, at a general or special term, for an assessment of the value of such land, and said petition shall contain a particular description of the property selected and condemned, with the name of the owner or owners thereof, and his, her, or their residences, as far as the same can be ascertained, together with a copy of the recorded map of the park; and the said court is hereby authorized and required, upon such application, without delay, to notify the owners and occupants of the land and to ascertain and assess the value of the land so selected’ and condemned by appointing three commissioners to appraise the value or values thereof, and to return the appraisement to the court; and when the values of such land are thus ascertained, and the President shall deem the same reasonable, said values shall be paid to the owner or owners, and the United States shall be deemed to have a valid title to said lands. That the said commission is hereby authorized to call upon the Superintendent of the Coast and Geodetic Survey, or the Director of the Geological Survey, to make such surveys as may be necessary to carry into effect the provisions of this section; and the said officers are hereby authorized and required to make such surveys under the direction of said commission. The President pro tempore, (Mr. J. J. Incauts). The question is on agreeing to the amendment proposed by the Senator from Ver- mont [Mr. Edmunds]. Mr. Grorce F. Hoar. I raise the question of the relevancy of the amendment to the bill to which it is proposed. Mr. J. S. Morr. [hope the Senator from Massachusetts will allow this amendment to go on the bill. Mr. Epmunps. I trust the Chair will pass on the question of order. Mr. Morritz. It is a matter of very great importance, involving the question as to whether we shall preserve the animals that pecul- iarly belong to this continent Mr. Hoar. I rise to a question of order. I call the attention of the Chair to the third clause of Rule XVI. The Prestpent pro tempore. The Chair is familiar with the rule, but supposed there would be no objection to the Senator from Vermont [Mr. Morrill] proceeding. If the Senator from Massachusetts desires to prevent debate Mr. J. C. Spooner. I ask unanimous consent that the Senator from Vermont [ Mr. Morrill] may be allowed to proceed. Mr. Hoar. Let the Chair submit the question for unanimous con- sent that the debate may proceed. Mr. Epmunps. I hope the Chair will rule on the question of order. The PresipENT pro tempore. The point of order is well taken. KIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. bg bf The question of relevancy must be submitted to the Senate without debate. Mr. Hoar. Mr. President The PrEsIpENT pro tempore. The question recurs on the proposi- tion submitted by the Senator from Massachusetts, Is the amendment relevant ? Mr. Hoar. I ask unanimous consent The Prestpent pro tempore. The Chair can not entertain debate. Mr. Hoar. I do not propose to debate, but I ask unanimous consent that the Senator from Vermont [Mr. Morrill] may proceed. The PresipEnt pro tempore. The Chair regards that as in the nature of debate. Mr. Epmunps. Let us take the question. The PrestpENnT pro tempore. The question will be taken on the relevancy of the proposed amendment. Is the amendment relevant? [Putting the question.] By the sound, the ayes have it. Mr. Hoar. J eall for a division. There were on a division—ayes 15, noes 4. The PrestpENT pro tempore. No quorum voting, the Secretary will call the roll of the Senate. The Secretary called the roll. The PrEsIDENT pro tempore. Thirty-nine Senators have answered to their names. A quorum is present. The question recurs on the point of order raised by the Senator from Massachusetts [Mr. Hoar] upon the relevancy of the proposed amendment, which, under the rules, must be decided by the Senate without debate. Mr. Epmunps. I ask the Chair to read the rule. The PrestpENT pro tempore. The Chief Clerk will read the third paragraph of Rule X V1, omitting the last clause. The Chief Clerk read as follows: 3. No amendment which proposes general legislation shall be received to any gen- eral appropriation bill, nor shall any amendment not germane or relevant to the subject-matter contained in the bill be received; nor shall any amendment to any item or clause of such bill be received which does not directly relate thereto; and all questions of relevancy of amendments under this rule, when raised, shall be sub- mitted to the Senate and be decided without debate, etc. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Is the proposed amendment relevant under therule? [Putting the question.] By the sound the ayes have it. Mr. Hoar. | will withdraw any further call for the yeas and nays, as the Senate seems to be decidedly of the opinion that the amend- _ment is relevant. The PresIDENT pro tempore. Does the Chair understand the ques- tion of relevancy to be withdrawn, or shall the decision stand in favor of the amendment? Mr. Hoar. I withdraw the call for the yeas and nays. 1174 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. The PrestpENT pro tempore. The Chair holds that the Senate decides that the amendment is relevant. The question recurs upon agreeing to the amendment of the Senator from Vermont [Mr. Edmunds]. Mr. Morritu. Mr. President, 1 was observing merely that it was important to have early action if it was intended to preserve the ani- mals peculiar to this continent. I understand that the Smithsonian Institution have had quite a number already donated to them, and although they are not seeking the employment of taking care of this zoological park or of these animals, yet if the duty is devolved upon them by Congress they will undertake it. So far as the park is concerned it is absolutely indispensable that action shall be taken at an early day if it is intended to have this park, which is said to be the most desirable spot, perhaps, in the whole coun- try and which has already been surveyed. Unless it is taken hold of immediately it is very likely to be grabbed by a syndicate of specula- tors, and when it shall be undertaken to improve it with streets and with city lots it would be entirely ruined as a zoological park. Therefore the earliest action possible is necessary if we would be sure to locate the park where it is supposed to be very desirable to have it located. Mr. Hoar. Mr. President, | had my attention called to this scheme some time since, and have always very earnestly favored it. I think the establishment of such a place of wholesome recreation and instruc- tion for the youth, for the children,and for the poorer people of a large city is eminently wise, and that it is entirely fitting that it should be procured here at the national capital at the national expense. The purpose in raising the question has not been to defeat or to attempt to defeat the proposition, but only to have the Senate decide asa precedent for other cases the question of order, which has been raised sometimes in like cases where I thought it could not be fairly sustained; and having accomplished that purpose I am content. The Presiding Officer (Mr. J. K. Jones of Arkansas in the chair). The question is on the adoption of the amendment offered by the Senator from Vermont [Mr. Edmunds]. The amendment was agreed to. The bill was read the third time and passed. Mr. Preston B. PLums. I move that the Senate insist on its amend- ments to the bill and request a conference with the House of Repre- sentatives on the bill and amendments. The motion was agreed to. February 2, 1889—House. Mr. Samurt Diese, from the Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds, submitted a report (H. 3907) to accompany bill (H. 11810): The Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds to which was FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1175 referred the bill (H. 11810) for ‘‘the establishment of a zoological park in the District of Columbia,” having had the same under con- sideration, respectfully submit the following report: Appended hereto is a letter of Prof. S$. P. Langley, Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, portraying the necessity of such a park and the advantages to be derived from its establishment; and, for the rea- sons therein set forth, your committee respectfully recommend the passage of the bill. SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, Washington, D. C., January 18, 1889. My Dear Sir: I write what follows in accordance with the suggestion of your yes- terday’s letter, intending it for your consideration and that of the committee. From all parts of the country, for many years, presents of live animals have been made to the Government through the Smithsonian Institution or the Museum, but the absence of any appropriation for their care has led to their being sent away (though most reluctantly) to increase the collections of the zoological parks in Phila- delphia, New York, London, and other cities. It should be better known than it is that everywhere through the country there is a disposition on the part of private individuals to give to the Government in this way, and without any expectation of return, remarkable specimens, which the donor (very commonly a poor man) some- times refuses advantageous pecuniary offers for, and it seems hard to decline gifts made in such a spirit, or, accepting them, to give them away again. But little over a year ago I gave instructions that these live specimens should be retained temporarily, as an experiment, and although a very few have been pur- chased, the collection, which is a subject of so much local popular interest, has been thus formed, substantially by gift, within perhaps fifteen months, and this though many proffers have been declined for want of means to carefor them. Iam persuaded that if it were generally known that the Government would receive and care for such gifts within a very few years the finest collection of American animals in the world might be made here in this way, with comparatively no expenditure for purchase. Among the many interested in the incipient collection was Senator Beck, whose bill for the formation of a zoological park was brought before the Senate on April 23, 1888. The writer directed the Senator’s attention to the fact that a piece of ground singularly suitable, by the variety of its features, to the provision for the wants of all the different kinds of animals, existed in the picturesque valley of Rock Creek, in the part nearest to the city. Here not only the wild goat, the mountain sheep, and their congeners would find the rocky cliffs, which are their natural home, but the beavers brooks in which to build their dams, the buffalo places of seclusion in which to breed and replenish their dying race, aquatic birds and beasts their natural home, and in general all animals would be provided for on a site almost incomparably bet- ter than any now used for this purpose in any other capital in the world. With this is the preeminently important consideration that the immediate neigh- borhood to the city would make it accessible not only to the rich but to the poor, and therefore a place of recreation to the great mass of the residents, as well as to the hundreds of thousands of citizens from all parts of the country who now annually visit the capital. It may be added that, so far as is known to the writer, all those interested in the desirable but larger plan for a public park along the whole Rock Creek region—that is to say, all those acquainted with the beauties and advantages of the site—regard the establishment of the proposed zoological park there with favor. It is very diffi- cult for anyone who has not visited the region to understand its singularly attractive character, due to the good fortune which has preserved its picturesque features intact until now, although the growing city is sweeping around and enveloping it. 1176 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. The Smithsonian Institution has not customarily received with favor the proposi- tions continually made it to place different local or national interests under its charge; but the very special reasons which seem in this case to enable it to at once secure a home and city of refuge for the vanishing races of the continent, and a place for the health and recreation of the inhabitants of the city and citizens of the United States, together with an opportunity for the carrying out an enterprise of national scientific value, and the formation of what, as regards its site at least, is the finest zoological garden in existence—all these considerations have moved it to see in this an oppor- tunity to carry out its legitimate work, ‘‘the increase and diffusion of knowledge among men.”’ When, therefore, Senator Beck made the understanding that the Smithsonian Institution would accept the charge of such a park the primary condition on which he would undertake to recommend it to Congress, the Secretary fe authorized to say that he believed it probable that the proposition would be favorably viewed by the Regents, and the matter once brought before Congress, he has not disguised his own interest in the success of the measure. The bill brought in by Mr. Breckinridge in the House (and by Senator Morrill in the Senate) appropriates $200,000 for the purchase of not less than 100 acres of land. The land actually most desired for the zoological park covers about 120 acres, being precisely that portion of the Rock Creek valley which will be soonest destroyed, as regards its picturesque and attractive features, by the laying out of streets and lots. Nevertheless, and largely owing to the very fact that the picturesqueness of the local- ity implies the existence of rocks, precipices, and valleys, which it would cost much to level and fill in, this land can still be obtained at rates which, considering its neighborhood to the city, are remarkably cheap. The most thorough examination that I have been ableto make, the testimony of various real-estate experts and others, have satisfied me that the purchase may and will be completed for somewhat less than the sum named in the appropriation, even leaving a small margin for the erection of a preliminary shelter for the animals. I beg most respectfully to urge upon the attention of the committee the fact that it is at once the strength and weakness of this measure that, so far as is known, it isan entirely disinterested one, the real-estate holders in the vicinity being generally indifferent or opposed to it, for reasons which can be explained, if desired, and that it is*being thus pressed upon Congress by those who have the measure at heart because anything that is done must be done soon. It is probable that within a year or two more the good fortune which has kept this singularly interesting spot intact, while the growing city is encircling it, will protect it no longer. It is not the mere space on the map which is to be secured, but natural advantages which have no rela- tion to the number of acres, and which can not be restored if once destroyed, since it is not in the power of Congress itself by any expenditure of money to recreate a rock or a tree. Iam, very respectfully, yours, 8. P. Lanewey, Secretary. Hon. Samvurt Drssxe, House of Representatives. Committed to Committee of the Whole. February 27, 1889—House. In considering the District of Columbia bill for 1890, Mr. Judson C. Clements submitted a conference report: The next and last item involving any expenditure of money is an appropriation of $200,000 for a zoological park, proposed to be pur- chased through the instrumentality of a commission provided for in FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. LEV? the Senate amendment. The conferees on the part of the House have not thought proper to yield on that question. Mr. W. H. Harcn. And I hope they will not. Mr. W. S.-Hotman. I hope not. Mr. James H. Buount. I wish to ask my colleague in relation to one point. I understood him to say that there is an item there for the purchase of a park. Mr. Crements. Yes, a zoological park; an amendment put in by the Senate. The appropriation is $200,000. Mr. Buount. At what point? Mr. 8. J. Ranpati. At no point. Wherever they may select. Mr. Cuiements. I think there is some intimation as to the locality, but it is very loose. Mr. Ranpatu. It is very loose indeed. Mr. Davin B. Henperson, of Iowa. Mr. Speaker, this question of a national park or a zoological garden is a matter to which I would like to have the House give its attention. It will be observed that we have practically agreed upon all matters in controversy between the two Houses except the amount to be given for street improvements and the question of this national park. Nearly all the remaining matters in issue between the two Houses have been agreed upon. In regard to this park, I would be glad if the House would give some expression of its views. In the House bill there was no provision for a park. The Senate amended the bill by providing for the purchase of 200 acres of ground for a zoological park or garden. Since that time a sentiment has developed in this city, and it has been pressed upon us by a citizens’ committee, that we should inaugurate here a national park embracing some 2,000 acres of land. Now, if it is the sentiment of the House that we should have a park at all, I would be glad to have some expression of that kind at this time, so that we may act intelligently in the conference. For myself, I say that I incline very strongly in favor of a park in thiscity. We have not one now. Mr. Joun A. ANDERSON, of Kansas. How much will it cost? Mr. Henperson, of Iowa. It is estimated that it will cost, all told, to get the land about a million and a half of dollars. I am satisfied that a provision can be drafted in the conference that will bring the amount much below that sum, by compelling the property owners whose land will abut on this park to contribute largely to the expense. If some general instructions were given to us declaring that the senti- ment of the House favors a park at all, I believe we can provide for carrying out that judgment ina wise manner. But if the House is against any park, the sooner we know that the better, that we may terminate this issue in conference. Mr. AnvrErson, of Kansas. How much is it estimated will be the cost of maintaining the park after it is established ? 1178 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Mr. Hrenperson, of Iowa. No estimate has been made in that respect as to the national park. As to the zoological park, the esti- mate was about $25,000 a year—probably $40,000 for the first year or two, when the Government would be putting in accommodations for the animals. Our experience would probably be about the same as that of other cities in regard to their parks. I will say, for the information of those who desire to know, that, according to the figures furnished to us, the parks in London embrace 2,200 acres; in Paris, 58,000 acres; Vienna, 8,000 acres; Tokyo, 6,000 acres; Berlin, 5,000 acres; Dublin, 1,900 acres; Versailles, 3,000 acres; Central Park, New York City, 840 acres. Chicago has just author- ized a park of 2,000 acres. I do not know what number of acres may be embraced in the present parking system of that city. San Fran- cisco has 1,200 acres of park. The city of Washington has no park. It is a question for grave thought and earnest consideration whether the time has not arrived when our national capital should have a park in keeping with the capitals of other nations. I think that we should have the judgment of our associates in this House on that subject. I believe in this park; I am for it; but I will yield my judgment to that of the House and will devote my efforts to carrying out its wish. I repeat that I would be glad to have an expression of the sentiment of the House before we again go into conference. Mr. Hatcn. Does the gentleman wish to be understood as saying that there is in the Senate amendment provision for two parks—one a general park and one a zoological garden ? Mr. Henperson, of Iowa. No, sir. The original amendment which was put on the bill by the Senate provides for the purchase of 200 acres for a zoological garden. The proposition now urged upon us is to have a national park embracing some 2,000 acres, running clear out to the boundary, and which shall include a zoological garden—the greater to include the less. Mr. Hatcu. How much of this proposed appropriation is to be devoted to the establishment of the zoological garden ? Mr. HenpeErson, of Iowa. It was estimated that for the first year about $40,000 would be required to equip and run the zoological park. Mr. Harcu. That is aside from the purchase of the land? Mr. Hrenperson, of Jowa. I think the amount embraced in the amendment of the Senate for the purchase of the ground for the zoo- logical garden is about $200,000. I desire to say in this connection, as suggested to me by the gentle- man from Pennsylvania [Mr. O’Neill], that Philadelphia has 2,900 acres of park. Mr. Hartcu. If the gentleman would include in this bill an amend- ment providing for inclosing the Capitol as a ‘‘ zoological park,” I think the country would indorse the proposition, for we have now as big a ‘‘ bear garden” here as anybody could want. FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1179 Mr. Henperson, of Iowa. No doubt there are in the Capitol some animals that ought to be taken in. But let us not turn this matter to mirth. It is a serious question and I think it should be seriously considered by the House. Mr. Ranpau. Does the gentleman from Iowa maintain that the conferees representing the House and the Senate upon a controversy involving $200,000 for a zoological garden can entertain a proposition for purchasing, not 200 acres, but 2,000 acres, at an expense of a million of dollars? Mr. Henverson, of Iowa. I think it is within the power of the two Houses to do that. Mr. Ranpatu. Well, then, I hope this House will take that fact into consideration in the vote which it will give. Mr. Henperson, of Iowa. That is why I have said in perfect candor that I do not want to do anything on this question until we have an expression of the sense of the House; I have frankly presented the question with that view. I certainly would not venture on such a proposition without some expression from the House in favor of it. Mr. Brount. Will the gentleman from Iowa permit me to ask him a question ? Mr. Henperson, of Iowa. With great pleasure. Mr. Buiount. The proposition is for a zoological park? Mr. Henpverson, of Iowa. Yes, sir. Mr. Biount. The gentleman says there is being pressed on them a plan for a national park, an entirely distinct one from this zoological park? Mr. Henperson, of Iowa. It is to be an enlargement of this, and embraces animals as well as a general park. Mr. Buounrt. Is it to be a national park? Mr. Henperson, of Iowa. It isa national park, embracing a zoo- logical collection. That is what they are pressing upon us. A num- ber of bills have been introduced into the Senate and House embracing that idea. Iam not certain but favorable reports have been made on them. The gentleman from Illinois [Mr. Rowell], on the District Committee, says favorable report has been made on that proposition. Mr. Burount. What is the extent to which they propose to enlarge? Mr. Henperson, of Iowa. They propose to take in about 2,000 acres. The park proposed by the amendment is to be located on Rock Creek. The larger park would take in the smaller. Mr. Buounr. I understand that is being discussed by the conferees. Mr. Henverson, of Iowa. We have only discussed the zoological features so far. Mr. Biounr. But it is being pressed. Mr. Henpverson, of Iowa. It is being pressed by the citizens’ com- mittee. A committee came and asked us to consider it. 1180 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Mr. Biount. Do the conferees consider it is competent for them to entertain the proposition ? Mr. Henprerson, of Iowa. We can enlarge or decrease it, but I think some expression should come from the House before we enter on any such proposition. Mr. Breckrnriper, of Kentucky. Will the gentleman yield to me? Mr. Henperson, of Iowa. Yes, sir. Mr. BreckInripGr, of Kentucky. As the amendment now stands it is limited to a zoological park. Mr. Henperson, of Iowa. Yes, sir, Mr. Breckrnriper, of Kentucky. What the gentleman wants is instructions to go further and make an amendment for a national park. Mr. Henperson, of Iowa. We want an expression from the House whether they want a park or not. Mr. BreckrnrinGe, of Kentucky. There is the difficulty with those of us who are in favor of a zoological park and against a national park. For one I am in favor of a zoological park. I think if we can appropriate money for the purpose of making archeological and ethnological researches and to send out the Adbatross to find fossils at the bottom of the sea we can certainly spend a few thousand dollars to keep the animals now nearly extinct from becoming entirely so by the establishment of a zoological park in this city. I think that is a wise thing, but I am not willing to go into a real estate speculation to the extent of 2,000 acres for a national park. Mr. Henperson, of Iowa. I wish to impress upon the House if we are going to have a park here it must be provided soon, for when houses are built and the city extends into the region where the park is proposed to be built, the only available ground for it will be taken up. It is now within our reach, and citizens are eager to contribute from their own pockets to aid in building it. If the larger scheme can be made the property holders will contribute largely toward it. Mr. BrecxinrinGr, of Kentucky. I do not wish to be understood as wishing to prevent any liberal citizens from buying 1,800 acres of land and presenting it to the Government or city for that purpose if they choose. I wish to be understood only as favoring the zoological park instead of the other; and, if possible, I should like to have some expression of sentiment on the part of the House which would enable the conferees to act on that proposition. Mr. Henperson, of Iowa. But for the fact that a few men planted in the midst of the proposed park, having the power of refusing to sell their lands or fix any price upon them, are able to block the way of their fellow-citizens in this respect, there would probably be not so much necessity for this action. But the power to condemn must be given to reach that class of people. That is why the citizens of the FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1181 District of Columbia insist upon some legislation to reach them. Efforts were made by subscription; a large amount has already been obtained by subscription, and, as I understand, a considerable amount has been promised; but because of the fact that here and there some person will refuse to give way or allow his property to be used for the purpose at any compensation, hoping to be able at some time or other to demand from his fellow-citizens blackmail of 200 or 300 per cent over the value of the property, it is necessary that some such steps should be taken to allow the exercise of the right of eminent domain, if this work is ever to be prosecuted. Because, as I have said, when this land is built up, it will be very difficult and very expensive to get possession of it. Mr. Biount. Will the gentleman permit me a moment? Mr. Henverson, of Iowa. Certainly. Mr. Birounr. For many years we have been told when making the appropriations pertaining to the Potomac Flats that the Government would gain thereby about 700 acres of land. I wish:to ask my friend if in the investigation of this matter that subject has been considered. Mr. Henperson, of Iowa. We did not have that matter before us, I will state to my friend from Georgia. Mr. Brounr. If my friend had heard my question I think he would not have answered me in that way. He has just stated, when he was referring to the need of securing the land which it was desirable to secure possession of for the purposes of a national park, that it would be difficult after awhile, or in a few years, to get suitable lands; and in that connection I asked the gentleman whether he or his fellow-con- ferees in discussing the feasibility of getting lands for this purpose had turned their attention to the large amount of land which would prob- ably be reclaimed from the Potomac Flats. Mr. Henperson, of Iowa. No, sir; it has not been urged upon us as either desirable or available for that purpose. On the contrary, the region of Rock Creek, it is represented, is a beautiful region of coun- try for the purposes of the park, equally adapted for that purpose as the Philadelphia park, and better perhaps than Central Park in New York. I do not know as to the accuracy of that, for I have not inspected them. I simply lay the matter before the House and ask an expression of its judgment. Now I would like to answer my friend from Ohio who is on his feet. Mr. Bens. Burrerworrnu. I wish to ask if it is not possible to make substantial progress in this matter by ascertaining first what lands can be obtained, surveying the outlines, and then get the next Congress to act upon it, if we are not now ready to do so? I understand that neither the price of the ground is known, nor in fact the exact limits the park is proposed to occupy. Mr. Henperson, of Iowa. They have made and submitted very care- ful estimates of the-cost. 1182 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Mr. Burrerwortnu. But I only wish to suggest whether it is not possible to insert a provision here looking in the direction the gentle- man contemplates. Mr. Henperson, of Iowa. The citizens’ committee have that matter well in hand. The region is well mapped out, and the only difficulty is in the want of power to condemn for the purpose of acquiring title for the Government. I will yield to the gentleman from South Carolina [Mr. Hemphill], unless some other gentleman desires to be heard. Mr. Joun J. Hemputiy. I would like to offer the following instruc- tion to the committee of conference. The Speaker (Mr. Jonn G. Car.isLE). It is not now in order to instruct the conferees. It can be read for information, if the gentle- man desires. Mr. Hempuity. Then I ask that it be read for information. The Clerk read as follows: Resolved, That the House managers on the District of Columbia appropriation bill are hereby instructed by the House to endeavor to secure such action by the mana- gers on the part of the two Houses on the Senate amendment numbered 124 as will secure to the District of Columbia a national park. Mr. Hempeuitt. I| offer that resolution with a view of getting the sense of the House on this question. As those of us who have been here for a year or two remember, an effort has been constantly made on the part of the Senate to so provide in the appropriation bill for the District of Columbia that some legislation may be had for the establishment of a zoological park. At the same time there have been bills pending before this and the other branch of Congress for a national park, and if the national park project is adopted then the provision for the zoological park as a separate institution will be entirely unneces- sary. The bill for the national park has been reported favorably and unanimously by the Committee on the District of Columbia, who have taken a great deal of pains in this respect to investigate the subject and ascertain all of the details. Inasmuch as no opportunity will be afforded us in this session of Congress to present this matter to the House, and as in the view of the committee it is important that it should at the present time be acted upon, I would like to submit the views which influenced the committee in reporting this bill favorably. Now, Mr. Speaker, there has been a great deal said heretofore about how much has been spent upon the District of Columbia in the way of public improvements, but if gentlemen will look out upon this city they will see that there has been less done for the people of the District of Columbia, as citizens of this District of Columbia, than for the people of any other city in the United States. Now I do not say that the people here do not get more benefit from the public FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1183 buildings and parks than we get in South Carolina or any other city, but they have no general park here that belongs to the public. They have no public buildings where the city authorities have a permanent abiding place. They have no post-office fit for any city of this country or any country that is civilized. In fact, there has been nothing done for the people of this city that has not been done for people of other cities of this Union not as large. Therefore I trust that gentlemen will not view this question unfavorably upon the theory that there has already been as much done for the people of this District as the Government is under obligation to do. Now there is scarcely a city of any size in the United States that has not a public park. While there are a number of small parks in this city, there is not a single one of any size, where the people can go out into the country, as it were, and get the fresh air and have all the invigorating influences that come from the country, that does not belong to some private party. There is, it is true, a number of small reservations, but they do not accommodate the large portion of the city growing out toward the west, and if the same spirit governs us in the future that has in the past, the whole of the park in which the Smithsonian Institution is situated will be occupied by public buildings. Mr. Bianp. Does not the gentleman from South Carolina think that if the obstructions were taken away that have been created by the Pennsylvania Railroad and the ground cleared that that would be a very desirable park ? * * * * % * * Mr. Hempuiti. I will state, Mr. Speaker, that if there is any por- tion of this District in which we could well have a park it is this portion through which Rock Creek passes, and I would say that if the people of this District are to have a park for such portion as would be an honor to this city, being the capital of this nation, they can not get it unless they get it under action of this Congress. There is no power in any governmental officer here to condemn land or to put his finger for a public purpose upon a single piece of property in this District, and therefore whatever is done must be done by action of Congress. Now I know, Mr. Speaker, that 2,000 acres of land is a very large park for a city of the size of the city of Washington, and if we were to legislate for to-day or for the near future it would be too large; but we all know that this city is growing rapidly, that property is going up in price, and that if we are to have a national park in this city this is the most opportune time the Congress of the United States will ever see. We can get a park here in this District now at a cost which will not be any more than one-fifth or one-sixth of what has already been expended for the purchase of land by the city of Phila- delphia or New York or any of the large cities in this country. In 1184 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Brooklyn, where they have a large park, they spent $3,919,000 in the purchase of the land alone. In St. Louis, where they have a new park of about 788 acres, they paid $849,000. In addition to that they have a number of other parks in the city of St. Louis, and I do not under- stand, Mr. Speaker, why the people of this District and the people of the United States should not be willing to expend as much money for the benefit of the people residing in this capital city as is ordinarily spent by people who control their own expenses. Mr. Himary A. Herspert. Will the gentleman state how much is the annual expense of keeping any of these parks in order that he has mentioned? Can the gentleman give us any idea of the annual expense of keeping up one of these immense parks? Mr. Hemenity. No, sir; I have not any information upon that sub- ject. I will say, however, to my friend from Alabama that I presume the people of those cities are well satisfied with the expense that is found to be necessary to keep up these parks, because there is not a single instance where such a public park has ever been dedicated and the people have taken it back and put it to any other use, as they might do if they were dissatisfied, and not only have those cities which have parks kept them up and improved them, but nearly every other city of any importance in the country is now seeking to acquire such a park. Mr. W. P. TauBer. I will ask the gentleman from South Carolina whether it is not a fact, so far as he has observed with regard to this matter of public parks, that a large portion of the expense which is necessary in order to maintain them is derived from the leasing of proper privileges to citizens within the parks? Mr. Hemeuity. I think that might be made available to quite a large extent in maintaining a park. Mr. A. J. Horxins, of Illinois. I desire to ask the gentleman a question as to the propriety of this legislation on an appropriation bill. Is there anything in the proposed amendment that would limit or control the purchase of this property, or protect the interests of the people at large against the privileged few who would be benefited? Mr. Hemputtu. My resolution was presented simply to test the sense of the House upon this question, so that if the resolution is adopted and the report comes back from the conferees, the House, if it be satisfied that the amendment is a properly drawn one, can adopt it; if not, can give the conferees further instructions, or can reject the amendment. This leaves it to the conferees upon the part of the House, if this resolution is adopted, to prepare a suitable amendment by which the interests of the public will be properly guarded. Mr. Benton McMinn. Will the gentleman from South Carolina permit me to ask him a question? Mr. Hempuity. Yes, sir. FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1185 Mr. McMrxurn. The gentleman has referred to parks that have been purchased or made by other cities, and to the expenditures incurred therefor. Mr. Hempnuity. Yes, sir. Mr. McMixun. Does the gentleman propose that the city of Wash- ington shall do what those other cities have done, pay for the parks that it gets, or does he propose that they, in conjunction with the bal- ance of the people of the United States, shall pay for it, and that his constituents and mine shall pay for part of it? Mr. Hempuitt. I will say to the gentleman that so far as I am con- cerned I would propose that the citizens of the United States should do with reference to this public park as they do with reference to all other public improvements in this District; that is, that they should pay their fair share of the cost of the park. We own one-half of the property in the District. It belongs to the United States, and the concurrence of opinion has been up to this time that the Government of the United States ought not to own half the property here unless it is willing to pay half the expenses. Mr. McMixurn. Will the gentleman permit another question ? Mr. Hempuitt. Yes, sir. Mr. McMiuu1n. The gentleman says that the people of the United States own one-half of the property here? Mr. HempuHity. Yes, sir. Mr. McMru1n. In order to arrive at that estimate is it not a fact that the parks themselves which are now established here have been charged to the people of the United States as a part of their property ? Mr. Hempuiiy. Well, sir, if they are a part of the property of the United States, and if the United States is not satisfied to hold them or to pay taxes upon them, let the Government sell them or erect public buildings on them. Mr. McMurry. Furthermore, is it not the fact that the streets have been charged against the United States in order to make up that estimate ? Mr. Hemputiiy. Ob, that is neither here nor there. Mr. McMrxuin. I will say to my friend that that is here. That is a fact, and is going to remain here. Mr. Hempuityu. Well, that may be a fact; but if so, it is a fact by the action of Congress, and it is not fair to blame the people of the District for something which Congress has done of its own free will. Mr. McMiuun. But you are endeavoring now to get Congress to do something more in the same direction. Mr. Hempurtyi. Well, if we have done an erroneous thing in the past, the proper remedy is not to deny to the people of this District a public park such as the people of other cities have. The proper remedy is to go to work now to regulate properly the proportion of H. Doc. 732 15 1186 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. the expenses of the District which the people here ought to pay, and the proportion which the people of the United States ought to pay. But let us not visit the punishment upon the people of the District, when they have had no voice in the action that has been taken in the past, and when it has been done by — itself, which has had sole authority to act in the premises. Mr. Herpert. I wish to ask the gentleman from South Carolina whether it is not also a fact that in order to make the showing of the Government owning one-half of the property here, all the Government buildings have been charged to the people of the United States? And is it not also a fact that the Government itself, without any help from the people of the District, takes care of every public building here? Mr. Hempniiy. I presume that is all true, but I do not see that it has anything to do with the question at issue here. Mr. Herpert. It is an answer to your argument about the Govern- ment owning one-half of the property. Mr. Hempniiy. It is not an answer to my argument; and if the gentleman thinks it is, 1 am quite satisfied that he has a monopoly of that opinion. We did this ourselves. Congress fixed the matter to suit itself, and not the people of the District, and if anything is wrong Congress is responsible, and Congress alone has the power to change it. Mr. Herpert. The facts I have stated, though, go to your argument, based upon the estimate of the Government owning one-half the property here. Mr. Hempntiyi. That does not make any difference. I simply say that that is the estimate which has been recognized heretofore, and that Congress, which has had the power, has not changed it. The gentleman from Alabama is entitled to his opinion, and I may agree with him, but at the same time it is not fair to make the people of the District responsible for the existing state of affairs. Now, there is something else I would like to say in regard to this park. It is well known that Rock Creek flows right through the District from one end to the other, until it empties into the Potomac River. Along a considerable portion of Rock Creek the banks have been built up with dwelling houses, and as a natural consequence the creek has become in some parts the natural sewer for everything in the shape of refuse coming from those dwellings. Rock Creek has thus become a stench in the nostrils of the people in that portion of the city. There has been pressed most urgently upon the District Committee a proposition to arch over Rock Creek in part, and to tunnel another part, so as to get rid of these noxious odors coming from the creek. If we should undertake to do that work, although it would apply to only a very small part of Rock Creek, it would cost, according to the estimate, $600,000, and in all probability by the time we had finished it the cost would be a great deal more. FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1187 Now, as a pure matter of dollars and cents, I submit whether it is not better to keep the banks of this creek free from dwelling houses, and dedicate the land to some public purpose. I do not hesitate to say that something must be done for the protection of the people living in the neighborhood 6f Rock Creek, where buildings have been con- structed on its border. Unless something be done, that whole stream will become the deposit of the sewerage and refuse of people living upon its banks, and that portion of the city will soon have to be abandoned, or given over to people who can live in the midst of those stenches. Besides, Mr. Speaker, there will never be a time when this property can be purchased as cheaply as it can be purchased to-day. The people who own the land that is expected to be purchased along Rock Creek, if any be purchased at all, are the original owners of the property; and as a member of the District Committee I can say that not a single one of them, nor the representative of one of them, has come to me, or so far as I know to any member of the committee, urging this park project upon our consideration. Although I have heard the names of a number of these owners, I know but a single one; and although he bought a piece of property there four or five years ago he says, “‘If you want this land for a public park, I will sell it at a price that any gentleman in whom I have confidence will put upon it.” I think that is a fair proposition. He has not asked Congress to appropriate one cent; but he says that, on the contrary, he would prefer to hold the land that he might realize the advance in price. It is true that a part of the property along this creek has become very valuable. I know a gentleman in this city who, according to repute—I have no personal knowledge of the fact—purchased, seven or eight years ago, a piece of property adjacent to this creek which he could now sell for $250,000 or $300,000. If we are ever going to get a park, now is the time; it is in my opinion the only time when the people’s representatives will be willing to vote the sum necessary to secure it. In addition to that, Mr. Speaker, if this park is purchased the Dis- trict under the usage and the existing law will have to pay one-half of the expenses. It is proper that the people owning property along the line of this park should pay their just proportion in view of any increased value which may arise from the dedication of this land to public use. The District is in a better condition to pay its share of this money now than it will probably ever be for years to come. There is a considerable surplus in the treasury of the District, amount- ing to several hundred thousand dollars—between six hundred thou- sand and seven hundred thousand. Mr. Biount. How about the debt? 1188 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Mr. Hempnuiny. Of course there is a debt due by the District, but it is not payable. Mr. Ranpauu. The District is in debt to the Federal Government to the extent of a million dollars, on account of the expense of the work ~ on the aqueduct, and I suggest, if there is any surplus in the treasury, the District should devote it to paying that indebtedness. Mr. Hempuity. I want to remind the gentleman from Pennsylvania that, as I understand, this aqueduct was controlled entirely by officials of the United States. Mr. Ranpautu. The gentleman was stating that the District has $600,000 in its treasury undisposed of. I wanted to say that I thought the best appropriation of that amount would be for the District to pay something toward the million of dollars advanced by the Government on the aqueduct, which has proved an utter failure. Mr. Hemputtt. I think before the District pays any money on that account there ought to be instituted an investigation to see whether the Government of the United States has not swindled the people of this District out of a great deal of that money. As I understand, there is an investigation now going on at our expense A Memper. The committee has reported. Mr. Hempuiiu. Yes, the investigation is finished, I believe; and 1 understand there is a very black report, so far as the Government of the United States is concerned. If we have taken the money of the people of this District, or at least run them into debt to the extent of a million of dollars, and if, according to the report made by members of this body, we have misappropriated the money designed for the construction of that tunnel Mr. Ranpauu. That was done against the remonstrance of the Com- mittee on Appropriations. Mr. Hempumy. That may be true. Yet the District is not respon- sible, as the gentleman will admit. It is by the fault of officials of the United States Government that this misappropriation has happened, and it is not right to visit our sins upon the people of this District. Now, Mr. Speaker, they talk a great deal about having a ‘‘monkey show” here, and all that sort of thing, just the same kind of language we heard when this question was before the House on a former occa- sion. We spend a great deal of money in keeping in order the hor- ticultural garden down here. The gentleman from Kentucky [Mr. Breckinridge] very properly says that we ought to provide for the preservation of the animals on this continent before they become extinct; but I think it much more important that we should furnish some outlet, some breathing place, for the poor people of this city, who can not get away in the hot weather, and to give them fresh air, sunlight, and a chance for health and life. Those who live here and can not get away, and those of us who were kept here last summer FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1189 during the long discussion upon the tariff, have seen the poor people sitting out and lying out on the streets iy day and night, under the baking sun of the day or the reflected heat of the streets at night, unable to get relief from the intense heat; and I do not know that we can do a better thing than to furnish to the children of the poor peo- ple some shaded places where they can go and get rid of the hot glow of the summer sun. If, then, it is important to preserve the animals of the country, how much more important is it to do something toward preserving the health of the people, and especially those of our people who can not: get away in the summer time? I trust we will not be niggardly and unjust to these people; and while we are willing to establish a park here for animals, forget them and their wants, but that we will rise to a proper consideration of the question, and I believe when we have done so we will give to the people of this city what is given to the people of other cities, who have the privilege of electing their own city officials, their own city council and mayor, a proper and suitable public park. Mr. Ciements. Mr. Chairman, I will occupy not exceeding five minutes in this discussion. The gentleman from South Carolina has spoken of the injustice to the people of this District in refusing this appropriation, and intimates illiberality on the part of the Govern- ment. Mr. Hempniiy. Well, I do not mean to say that the Government is illiberal, but I tried to show that the people of the District did-not receive as much benefit as some of our friends seem to think they have already received, and as I myself thought they received before I got here and served upon the committee. Mr. Criements. I wish to show, Mr. Speaker, something of the obligations of the District to the United States in connection with the District government. The bonded debt of the District of Columbia which the Govern- ment of the United States has assumed—that is to say, one half of it, principal and interest—on the 1st day of July was $20,581,000, as shown by the following statement from the last report of the Treas- urer of the United States. * * * The annual interest on this sum at that time was $906,000, of which the Government of the United States is paying one-half. In addition to the funded debt—and by the way I will state that the principal part of this has been for improvements in the District of Columbia—in addition to the funded debt there is one-half of the amount recently expended on the aqueduct tunnel for the increase of the water supply of the city; so that the amount due on the 1st day of July by the Dis- trict to the United States for money already advanced for the tunnel was $1,038,000. The debt of the District, funded and otherwise, of 1190 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. which the United States has assumed and is paying to the sinking fund one-half of the principal as it is discharged and annually one-half of the interest as it accrues, amounts in the aggregate to the immense sum of over $21,000,000. Now that we have a surplus of about a million in the treasury (which, if the Senate amendment prevails, would leave it only about a half million or a little less) the gentleman says is an opportune time to spend money for a zoological park, and at the same time adopt the larger provision for a national park, the one which he is advocating, which is to swallow up the zoological garden and make it a part of it. The provision inserted in the bill to which he refers, reported by his committee, as I understand, provides not for the immediate payment, but for the creation of a debt running along for future years, adding up and piling up against the people of the United States outside as well as those inside of the District a further accumulation of debt for the luxury of a park. Why not, in the interest of the taxpayer, apply it to the water debt or to the three and a half millions of bonds that will be due July 1, 1891—-within a year after the expiration of the year for which the appropriations of this bill are made? In my judgment there is no necessity in this city for a national park such as is proposed, as there is in other cities. The Government of the United States has reserved plats of ground all over the city, in addition to the larger reservations which we find everywhere, breathing places where the people can go; and: we have broad streets, and the Government has expended money in their improvement; and in the sundry civil bill each year is carried a large sum of money for paving the walkways through the reserva- tions, and paid for entirely out of the revenues of the Government; no part of it is paid by the District, nor is anything paid by the Dis- trict for the lighting of the reservations, for the convenience of the people of the District much more than for the people outside. And the gentleman himself has referred to the Soldiers’ Home, a place near by, which, while it does not belong to the city or the National Government strictly, yet it is a great place of resort and will remain there. Now, I believe the time has come when the Government of the United States is paying largely more than its proper share for the expenses of the District and that it ought to be reduced, and if the people of this city and District desire a park it is their business to provide it at their own expense ina larger measure than is provided in the amendment which it is proposed to incorporate in this bill. I yield to the gentleman from Texas [Mr. Mills] for five minutes. Mr. R. Q. Mirus. I was a member of the Forty-third Congress, when this strange copartnership was entered into between the Fed- eral Government and the government of the District of Columbia. ————————e Ce ee FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1191 When the local government of this District was abolished by the Forty-third Congress I then very seriously questioned the wisdom of that action, and every year since that time has satisfied me more fully that the government now held over the people of this District is wrong. Itis un-American. It is not in accordance with the princi- ples upon which we have organized local governments in this country. The people of this District ought to have a local government of their own, and the Federal Government ought to have such jurisdiction and control over the public property of the Federal Government as is nec- esssary to take care of it. Inthe arrangement of the compromise the interests of the Federal Government, which would apply in that gov- ernment, were abolished, and it was then determined that the Federal Government should pay one-half of all the expenses annually incurred in the administration of the government of the people. At that time, perhaps, it was a fair apportionment. The city was small; perhaps not exceeding. 100,000 inhabitants. It has passed beyond that, and the property owned by the Federal Government then was around this Capitol and in the streets and parks belonging to the Federal Government, which were retained by the Government for its use at that time. Now the city has extended, and is continuing to extend. The interest of the Federal Government is constantly decreasing in proportion as the interest of the people is constantly increasing. As my friend from Pennsylvania said a few moments ago, the apportionment is now excessive upon the Federal Government, and the people under the local government are not contributing what they ought to contribute toward the Government. I believe, sir, that we ought to stop this unnatural partnership, and the Federal Govern- ment ought to appropriate each year out of its own funds whatever is necessary and its equitable proportion for the protection of its public property and the interests of the city. But, sir, what interest has the Government in buying a park for the people of the District of Columbia? The park belongs to the people, not to the Federal Government. It is not for the interest of the Federal Government that there should be a park on Rock Creek or in the midst of the city. It is for the comfort and convenience of the people, and not for the Government, and the people ought to pay for it. We will continue this condition of things until we dissolve this unnatural government and give the people of the District of Columbia the same rights that we give the people of Texas—repre- sentation upon their population, charging them with their own local self-government. Mr. CLrements. Mr. Chairman, I now yield ten minutes to the gen- tleman from Georgia |Mr. Blount]. Mr. Biount. It is singular what a prejudice against the Treasury of the United States is manifested in connection with all the arguments 1192 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. made touching expenditures for this District. The distinguished gentleman who is now the chairman of the Committee on the District of Columbia alleges that the Federal Government ought to be liberal in the matter of appropriations here because it owns one-half of the property. The gentleman from Tennessee rightly suggested that in ascertaining the one-half of the property of the United States it con- sisted mostly in streets, alleys, and parks. Now, sir, I wish to know if any gentleman will gainsay the question that the streets and parks are for the people of this city; and if they are, will you undertake to close your eyes to it and charge it as a mat- ter inuring to the benefit of other people outside of this District? Why, sir, it is strange that such argumentation should obtain in so intelligent a body as this. In reference to the water supply here, the Government originally paid for it out of the Federal Treasury, and this people got it asa gratuity. Then these same people came in a few years ago and insisted that the Government of the United States should give them an additional water supply; and because, forsooth, there may have been some mismanagement in some given place, anwill: ing to take their own misfortune, they turn upon the Federal Govern- ment and charge it as a crime, wild insist that we shall make it good. It is said, sir, that the city a Washington has not been and is not fairly treated, is not liberally treated, and has not the same opportu- nities that other cities have. What city, sir, in this country—is it New York, Philadelphia, or any city in this country—that has the Federal Government come to it and take one-half of its burdens in the shape of taxation? Yet, sir, that was their singular argument. Again, sir, only a few years ago the people of this District com- plained that the public health was affected by the Potomac Flats, and if we would appropriate, as we have done, millions of dollars for the - reclamation of it—and it is going on to-day—we would reclaim 700 acres of beautiful land lying along the Potomac. A large part of it has been reclaimed, a large part is being reclaimed, and yet none of the gentlemen who have come before the House conferees, none of the gentlemen who appeared before the Committee on the District of Columbia, offer to use any portion of the 700 acres or any other area owned by the Government of the United States. It is always private property that we are to buy. No matter what we have, we can not utilize it. There is always some special reason why the necessary improvement should not be put on Government land, where it would take nothing out of the Treasury. My friend from Iowa says he has not heard of this matter at all in his interviews with the Senate conferees. It does not appear that that committee or the Committee on the District of Columbia ever hear of anything in connection with this question of the pur chase of land except Rock Creek Park. My friend, the chairman of the Committee FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1198 on the District of Columbia, says that no gentleman interested in that property has ever approached him. I take his statement as true. I take it as true, subject to this qualification: I do not suppose that my friend ever inquired into that matter at all. But, sir, there does come to us through other sources, there does come from citizens of this District who are in communication with members of this House the statement that there are persons engaged in a large real-estate specu- lation about this proposed Rock Creek Park. They have their attor- neys, who do approach other members of this House and who do press that project. It is doubtless being urged by them, and all of this word painting as to the beauty and importance and value to the city of this park is the work of those artists. Now, sir, so far as I am concerned, I am not willing to do anything that will put into the hands of the House conferees at such a time as this, with little opportunity for deliberation, with little opportunity to ascertain whether it is true, as stated by honorable citizens of this Dis- trict, that real estate speculations are involved—I am not willing, I say, to put into the hands of the House conferees authority at such a time to take action upon this important question. If it is true that speculators are organized to urge the sale of this park, let us beware, for the best of us may be misled. Let us postpone .this matter until we have time to investigate through a committee of this House the questions that are raising doubts in our own minds, and when we shall have done that and the matter shall have come up before us for delib- erate action, then let us give it due consideration. Sir, let us bear in mind the situation. Up to this hour the House of Representatives has refused to take up this question. It has been apprehensive about the parties in interest who were behind this proj- ect. It has been apprehensive lest it should be misled in this matter. It has been interested to preserve its own good name free from any possible imputation of scandal. While this is true of the House, the Senate has tacked on to this bill an appropriation of $200,000 for a zoo- logical garden, and when the conferees get together certain interested persons will be there pressing not for the $200,000 but to sell 2,000 acres of land. They tell you of what is done in Paris, of what is done in London, of what is done in Philadelphia; they appeal to your national pride to take up this matter now and not to postpone it. In the closing hours of the session, in that hurried conference, shall we make haste to dispose of the public treasure? My colleague has just stated that the Senate amendments to this bill involve an increase of expenditures in one year of 25 per cent. What city in this country would not make a halt at such a suggestion? It is enough of itself to cause us to stop short, and now, in the closing hours of this Congress, to put an end to this question, for the present at least, by instructing 1194 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. the House conferees that we will not entertain this project further at this time. [Cries of ‘* Vote!” ‘* Vote!”’] The CuatrMan. The time of the gentleman has expired. Mr. CLEMENTS was recognized, and yielded five minutes to Mr. Hopkins, of Illinois. Mr. Horxrys, of Illinois. Mr. Speaker, the arguments already made in favor and against the amendment offered by the gentleman from South Carolina [Mr. Hemphill] by members who have preceded me are as strong proof as any man can desire against the policy of adopting it. Gentlemen of intelligence and experience in such mat- ters contend that there is no necessity for the creation of a public park in the city of Washington of the character contemplated in the pro- posed amendment, while others of equal intelligence and experience insist that such a park is not only a necessity, but that members of the House who oppose it do not appreciate the importance of this great project. This, then, presents the issue as to whether the members of this House should favor a bill authorizing the laying out of a great national park in this the capital city of our country. Now, until this question is settled it seems to me, sir, that it is not wise legislation to attempt to appropriate a million and a half of dollars that may be used for such purpose. The gravity of the measure demands that it should be presented in a separate and distinct bill and brought before the House by a committee in the manner provided by the rules which we have adopted. In no other way can there be a full and a fair discussion of this proposition. If this vast sum of money is to be expended, as the gen- tleman from South Carolina [Mr. Hemphill] contends, for the good of the public, let the representatives of the public have a voice in determining the manner of its expenditure. The way in which the question is presented in the amendment takes from the members of the House all opportunity to be heard upon perfecting a bill for the pur- chase of the land for the creation of the proposed park and providing against illegitimate speculations by syndicates or real-estate dealers. We know that unless legislation for this object is properly guarded scandals are liable to arise. Now, before I am called to vote upon a proposition which takes from the public Treasury nearly a million and a half of money I would like to listen to the arguments of those who believe that a public park of the character proposed in the amendment should be established in Washington. When I have satisfied my mind as to the necessity of the park I will then be ready to assist in perfecting the legislation by which this is to be accomplished. But I protest against the summary manner in FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1195 which the friends and advocates of this proposed park are forcing this question. The gentleman from South Carolina [Mr. Hemphill] talks in a way that indicates that he has given much thought and study to the sub- ject. But I take it, sir, that the great majority of the members of the House feel as I do—that they would like more light upon the subject. I am opposed to this amendment for other reasons, but my time is too limited, I fear, to permit me to present them now. The Speaker. The time of the gentleman has expired. Mr. CLEMENTS was recognized, and yielded four minutes to Mr. MeMillin. Mr. McMnur. Mr. Speaker, I rise for the purpose of entering my protest against the proposition that is involved in the amendment now under discussion. The people of the United States have given to the city of Washington a greater area of parks and more park adornment than is possessed by any other city in the country in proportion to pop- ulation. This statement will not be denied by any one of the Repre- sentatives of sixty millions of people sitting around me. We have here Judiciary Square, Lafayette Square, Franklin Square, and Lincoln Park. Then we have the immense park and grounds extending from the Capitol to the Potomac, nearly 2 miles, to which we are adding hundreds of acres by the lands we are reclaiming from the © Potomac River at a cost of millions of dollars. The Capitol grounds and White House grounds also contribute their beauty. All this has been given by the United States to this city. But, not content with this, we are asked to go still further and sell the homes of the people in order to make them the habitations of monkeys. The gentleman from Iowa complains that some of the citizens living on the land which it is contemplated to purchase for this purpose are holding it back and attempting to *‘ blackmail” the Government by fixing a high price upon it. Itseems to be a crime in the eyes of some that the spot associated with school-boy days should have any pleasant memories to cause the grown-up man to linger there and_ be reluctant to turn it over as a residence for the bison and den for the snake. This is not designed simply as a park for the people; that is not the object. The purpose is to establish zoological grounds to be inhabited by rabbits, snakes, and all kinds of animals that will be delightful to the eye as objects for the inspection of those who visit here. What- ever the debate may claim to the contrary, the amendment itself shows that it is designed for a zoological garden. If the people of Washing- ton want that kind of a display, let them have it; but Jet them pay for it themselves. Mr. Jonn T. Hearp. Will the gentlemen yield for a question ? Mr. McMiiry. I would like to do so, but I have only four min- utes; the gentleman, therefore, will pardon me for declining. 1196 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. The amendment provides for the establishment of a zoological park in the District of Columbia ‘‘for the advancement of science!” A bear garden is to be established ‘‘for the advancement of science!” You are already paying, gentlemen, as the representatives of a hard- worked, tax-paying people one-half of the expenses connected with the government of this city. This itself is unjust and should not have been begun. Youare required by the proposed amendment not only to pay for this land, but to buy the monkeys and then pay for their keeping. Barnum is to have a new rival in his ‘‘animal industry,” and the people of the United States who can not get to Washington are to ‘‘pay the fiddler” for others’ dancing. Gibbon tells us love of the circus and fights of wild beasts characterized the degeneracy of the Romans. To gratify this morbid fondness for display of wild beasts one of Rome’s distinguished statesmen urged Cicero to hurry and send to the ‘* Eternal City ” the tigers, lions, etc., necessary for his approach- ing show. . Are we following in their footsteps and anxious to imitate their decline? I must enter my most solemn protest against saddling still further indebtedness upon the people of the United States for the pur- chase of land at $2,000 an acre, to be followed by the expense of keep- * ing up a zoological garden here in this city. Let us perform the duties legitimately devolving upon us, and not attempt to rival circus and menagerie owners in the show business. [Here the hammer fell. | Mr. Cxiements. I would like to inquire whether the gentleman from South Carolina [Mr. Hemphill] proposes to— Mr. Hempuitt. I will state that I am quite anxious to reach a vote, for the hour is now late; but I promised five minutes to the gentleman from Missouri [Mr. Heard] and five minutes to the gentleman from Maryland; and after that I want to say a word or two myself. I will then call the previous question. Mr. Ranpatu. Oh, no; you have not the control of this bill. Mr. Hempniiy. | mean the previous question on the resolution. Mr. Ranpauu. That has only been read for information. Mr. Hemputtt. I yield five minutes to the gentleman from Missouri [Mr. Heard]. Mr. Hrarp. Mr. Speaker, I am not unmindful of the fact that the House is impatient for a vote. I can not afford to ignore that fact any more than my audience can afford to listen to me when it is already tired. But I rise to protest mildly against the course of argumenta- tion which has been pursued in opposition to the position of my friend from South Carolina [Mr. Hemphill]. It may be all right for the dis- tinguished gentleman from Tennessee [Mr. McMillin] to inveigh in general against the policy of establishing zoological gardens, although FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1197 many eminent and patriotic statesmen favor it. It may be that it is all wrong, as the gentleman from Texas [Mr. Mills] argues, that the form of government which we find in this District exists. But, in the language of the gentleman from South Carolina, I beg leave to remind these gentlemen, respectfully, that we are not respon- sible for the existing law, but that there can be no ground purchased for the purposes of a zoological park or park of any kind, and no money expended for the maintenance and care of such park unless by the consent of Congress. I would remind the gentleman from Texas that it is not the fault of the people of this District that this ‘‘un- American system of government” exists here. This, as has been said by the gentleman from South Carolina, is due to the act of the Amer- ican Congress and without the agency or consent of these people. Let Congress assume the responsibility for its own misdeeds; if it did wrong, let it correct that wrong, and not lay the responsibility for it at the door of the District. Now, a word in reply to my friend from Georgia [Mr. Blount]. A few days ago, when a certain measure was under discussion in this House, that gentleman remarked in my presence that he would not give much for a man who always saw a ‘“‘job” in everything, and therefore opposed it. I responded that I agreed with him cordially in that feeling. Now, I want to call the attention of the House, and especially of my friend from Georgia, to the fact that, losing sight, I think, of the spirit of that sentiment, hé has made a speech against this proposition based primarily upon .the assumption by him that there is a ‘‘job” in it; that there is some great real estate organiza- tion behind it and pushing it; and he intimates that although the gen- tleman from South Carolina disclaims having been approached upon the subject by interested parties, perhaps others have been approached. Now, I have heard no man on the floor of the House or elsewhere, except the gentleman from Georgia, intimate that anybody had been approached. I do not believe he was ever approached—— Mr. Buount. If the gentleman wants to press that matter, I have no objection to answering very fully. Mr. Hxearp. I do not fear to press it. More than that, I invite the gentleman to make any disclosures in his knowledge. I challenge him todo so; for if he knows anything behind this scheme which makes it disreputable or liable to bring scandal upon the American people, I say it is his duty to disclose it for the benefit of his associates on this floor, that they, being warned by such knowledge, may be prepared to act as intelligently as he. Mr. Buiounr. Will the gentleman allow me—— Mr. Hearp. Not now; I want to finish my sentence. I want to say to the gentleman, however, in the presence of this House, every member of which who hears me knows that I speak truly, that the gentleman, 1198 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. while claiming a desire now to have this proposition discussed on its merits and fully, has always, to the extent of his power, obstructed the consideration of the same when the effort was made to bring it before the House in a separate bill; that when the chairman of the District Committee asked for the fixing of a day for District business the gentleman from Georgia resisted the granting of any time to that committee unless the consideration of this bill should be excluded. I say that the Committee on the District of Columbia, which reported this measure or a measure of this character, has been always anxious to have the matter discussed upon its merits and to have the House act intelligently upon it. But I am not willing to let the gentleman from Georgia intimate, without showing the reason for the intimation, that the ‘‘schemes” of which he talks may influence some gentleman other than himself to the conclusions at which they may arrive. If the gen- tleman knows of any improper scheme connected with this whole mat- ter, I repeat, let him now give the information to the House and the country in order that we may be duly warned. ‘This House will then act as intelligently and I believe as patriotically as will the gentleman from Georgia. I insist, Mr. Chairman, that the position taken by my friend from South Carolina is right. If the people of the United States pay more of the expenses of conducting the District government than they ought, it rests with Congress to change that rule. And let not this House forget that it is the duty of Congress to so change that rule as to secure justice alike to the whole country outside the District and to the Dis- trict of Columbia. This House should not forget, and I ask that in our instructions to the committee we should consider it, that it is com- petent for Congress to fix and determine the proportion of such expense as the District should bear. These conferees have come like honest men asking us for an expression of our opinion as to the merits of the proposition for a national park which they have been discussing in conference, and for our instructions as to what they shall do. Now, Mr. Chairman, let us discuss this matter like honest men deal- ing fairly with each other. If the sense of the House is against the measure on its merits, let us so instruct these gentlemen on the con- ference committee. But bear in mind, as the gentleman from South Carolina [Mr. Hemphill] has truly stated the proposition, if the peo- ple of this citv are to have the park privileges which they desire, they have got to be obtained through authority of this Congress. Nothing can be done by them without our permission. Even if they are willing to pay the entire expense of carrying out the plan, they can not do so on their own motion. It must be done, if done at all, under the authority of the Govern- ment of the United States. Congress can expend millions of dollars of the money belonging to the people of this District and waste it in | | FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1199 an aqueduct tunnel or otherwise, because it has the authority to do so; but the people of this District before they can do anything of the kind proposed, and before even they can expend their own money for any public purpose, must first get the authority of Congress to do it. If you are in favor of it, then it becomes all right; but otherwise they can do nothing. Mr. Harcn. Will my colleague permit me to ask him a question 4 Mr. Hearp. Certainly. Mr. Hatcn. Does the gentleman say that a million of dollars was wasted on the aqueduct tunnel? Mr. Hearp. I understand two millions of dollars were wasted upon that tunnel; and one million comes out of the treasury of the District of Columbia, though the waste occurred through no fault of hers, but by the negligence or misconduct of those acting for the Government. Mr. Harcu. Was not that bill reported by the Committee on the District of Columbia? . Mr. Harp. No, sir; it was not. That committee had nothing what- ever to do with it. Mr. Harcu. Who made the appropriation / Mr. Hearp. I am not prepared to answer who made the appropria- tion; but the District of Columbia could not do it, and I suppose of course the Committee on Appropriations. Mr. Buount. I can answer that question if I am allowed to do so. The Speaker. The gentleman’s time has expired. Mr. Ranpauu. I want to put the saddle on the right horse. If I remember correctly, that proposition originated in the Forty-seventh Congress. Mr. Hearp. That is beyond my memory of things here. I mean it did not come from the present Committee on the District of Columbia. Mr. Ranpautu. The gentleman said that it did not come from the District Committee. Mr. Hearp. Not since I have been a member of that committee, during the last four years. Mr. Ranpatu. I do not want any misunderstanding in this matter. My impression is, and I make the statement subject to review here- after when I have made examination, that this aqueduct-tunnel project came from the Senate in the Forty-seventh Congress. Mr. Hearp. But not from the District Committee. Mr. Ranpa.u. It came originally from that committee, if I recollect aright, and my friend from West Virginia [Mr. Wilson] corroborates that statement. As the gentleman from Missouri [Mr. Heard] has alluded to the Committee on Appropriations, I will merely remark that committee has resisted all along, under the leadership of the gentleman from West Virginia, the whole of this procedure. 1200 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS Mr. Hrarp. Allow me? Mr. Ranpatu. Certainly. Mr. Hearp. I am advised by my friend from Gann gia [Mr. Blount |—— Mr. Buiount. Do not put it too strong. Mr. Hearp. The gentleman from Georgia said it came from the Senate in the nature of an amendment to your bill. Mr. Ranpatu. I think not. Mr. Hearp. That is what the gentleman from Georgia says. Mr. Ranpau. Let us get this matter right. Mr. Hearp. I want no controversy with the gentleman from Penn- sylvania on this subject, because I do not assume to be prepared to contradict him or to correct him if he is wrong. My statement was based upon that received by me from the gentleman from Georgia [Mr. Blount]. Mr. Hempuitu. There is no need of controversy about it. I now yield the floor to the gentleman from Maryland [Mr. Shaw]. Mr. Frank T. SHaw. Mr. Speaker, I know the House is impatient to vote on this proposition and I will only detain it for a moment or two. Gentlemen seem to be oblivious of the fact that this is our capital city when they assert that in proportion to its population and extent it has larger park privileges than any other city of the United States and offer that as an argument against the pending measure. Not one of the constituents of any member of this House has come to this city but that member has felt a pride in showing him its beamlines its public buildings, broad avenues, and reservations. I understand the proposition has been made in the Senate to expend a certain amount of money for the purpose of still further beautifying and adorning this city. I feel a pride in this city, and am willing to vote to place a reasonable amount of money in the hands of trustworthy agents for the purpose of still further improving it. Improvements should here keep pace with the growth of our country. This capital should be so adorned as to be an incentive to patriotism, and thus be made to contribute toward perpetuating our republican form of gov- ernment. Money expended in this way is assuredly wisely invested. As this is the capital of the greatest nation upon the earth, so it should be made the most beautiful city in the world. Mr. Hempniwy. I desire merely to say a word or two more. Mr. Ciements. How much time does the gentleman propose to take? Mr. Hempuiii. How much time have I remaining? The SpreakeR. The Chair understood the gentleman was speaking in the time of the gentleman from Iowa [Mr. Henderson], and that being the case there are seventeen minutes remaining. aE FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1201 Mr. Hempuity. Does the gentleman from Georgia desire to go on this evening? Mr. Haren. Oh, let us finish this up. Mr. Hempuru. I only want to say that there seem to be some of our friends here who always manage to work themselves up into a state of undue excitement when anything of this kind is proposed because of apprehended real-estate speculations. It is not a question of whether somebody is going to make a little money or whether the District of Columbia is going to get full value received for the pro- posed expenditure, because if the scheme is undertaken it is the duty of Congress to see that the money is properly expended. It should be remembered, Mr. Speaker, that the people of the Dis- trict of Columbia, having no representation here on the floor, ought not be denied the right of having that which every other city is allowed to enjoy; and I will say if they object to this that there has not been a single man who came before the District Committee and made that objection known. In addition to that, all this talk about the people of the United States paying for ‘‘ monkeys,” and the homes of the people being taken away from them in order to establish places here to keep monkeys, has nothing whatever to do with the question. The people of the United States are not ‘‘ paying the money” in any sense in which these words are used in the speeches of gentlemen who are opposed to this measure. The property of the United States Government is paying its appropriate share of the taxes here. The amount that has been fixed by Congress is the amount that was believed to represent the proper proportions of the General Govern- ment toward the payment of taxes here, and if Congress thinks it is too large, it can change it if it is not satisfactory. Hence it has nothing whatever to do with the question; and it is not coming out of my pocket, nor your pocket, but is a tax levied upon the Government of the United States upon property which it holds in this city, and which pays only its share of the taxation. Now, there is nothing whatever in the idea that this thing is being pushed upon the House at the closing hours of the session of Con- gress. This measure has been pending in various forms since 1865, and was reported to Congress and thoroughly and fully investigated, and Mr. B. Gratz Brown, a gentleman who afterwards ran upon the national Democratic ticket, and ought therefore to receive the respect- ful consideration of this side of the House at least, reported in favor of it. Mr. Hatcu. I beg the gentleman’s pardon; he did not run upon the Democratic ticket; he ran on the Greeley ticket. Mr. Hemenrt. Oh, he ran on the ticket which the Democrats set up and voted for. It is too late now to deny it. The Democrats nominated him. H. Doc. 732——%6 1202 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Mr. Haron. I beg the gentleman’s pardon again; they did not nomi- nate him. Mr. Hempuiny. Well, whether they did or not, he ran on the Demo- cratic ticket, and the Democrats voted for him as a representative of Democracy, and he is an honorable man so far as I know his record. He reported in favor of this measure, and spoke in behalf of it in the Senate of the United States in 1866, and the question has been before Congress ever since that time. It was before the last Congress, and has been before every Congress for a long time, and will be before all Congresses to come, I suppose, until some definite action is taken in regard to it. I hope, therefore, the members of the House will vote upon this as a pure business transaction without reference to the other irrelevant questions which have been sought to be lugged into the debate. I yield the balance of the time back to the gentleman from Iowa. Mr. Henperson, of Iowa. Mr. Speaker, this debate has been run- ning about in the way I wanted it to run, because I desired an expres- sion of sentiment on the part of the House in regard to this proposition. There are one or two things in connection with the matter which either are not understood or which seem to be obscure to the minds of some gentlemen, and to which I desire to call the attention of the House briefly. The first parties that agitated the question of a zoologi- cal park or garden in this city were gentlemen connected with the Smithsonian Institution, and the central figure among them was Mr. Hornaday, a very intelligent gentleman, a man of large experience, who spent much time in the jungles of Africa and in other places, and felt a patriotic interest in preserving the remaining animals of this country. He came before the Committee on Appropriations with the proposi- tion, but the committee rejected it, and I was influenced somewhat by the idea suggested by my friend from Georgia at the time that proba- bly there was a real-estate scheme back of the proposition. I think | this House knows pretty well the fact that I have been quite an aggres- sive party in making attacks on such things as that when I thought they had as an inspiring motive such underlying influences. I have fought them vigorously, and have had some experience and hard fights in conferences with my friend from West Virginia [Mr. Wilson] on the same question. But after looking into this matter my investiga- tion satisfied me that the real-estate speculators were against the park. Now, the Senate has put on an amendment here providing for a 200- acre proposition. The citizens finding it at that stage, took it up and wanted to enlarge the appropriation into a national park, keeping the zoological garden as a feature of it. I had no part in getting up the bill or in reporting it, not being a member at that time of the District Committee, favoring the national part. So far as I have investigated | FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 12038 it, and so far as the question of every great city having breathing places for its population is concerned, that feature comes to me with force in favor of the proposition. If it embraces a real-estate specu- lation, if it is for that purpose, I am for hitting that with an iron hand; but I am not prepared to sacrifice it because it might be an inci- dent. I know nothing of the kind. No one approached mé on the subject excepting the citizens’ committee, ably represented and ably spoken for, who came before the conferees on the part of the House to represent their views. I thought it my duty before entering upon so important a question to lay it before the House and invite instruc- tions. I care not whether it be voted up or voted down upon this bill. I will endeavor to carry out the instructions of the House. Iam for the park, I am for a zoological garden, but Iam frank in telling you that whatever is the judgment of this House in its action on this mat- ter will be law for me. Mr. Horxrns, of Illinois. Does the gentleman not think it would be better to have that project in a separate bill? Mr. Henperson, of Iowa. I am not prepared to answer that for this time. Mr. Ciements. Mr. Speaker, how much time is there remaining? The Speaker. There are only six minutes remaining. Mr. CLements. I yield two minutes to the gentleman from New Jersey [Mr. McAdoo]. Mr. Witi1am McApoo. The combination between the United States Government and the: District of Columbia is, in my opinion, an infamous outrage upon the taxpayers of the United States; and so long as it exists this capital city of the nation will be disgraced as the Mecca of speculators and professional boomers. This is the best parked city in the world. It has no districts of congested population; it has no commerce; it has no manufacturers; it has uniform, broad, open, healthful, well-paved avenues; it has no towering tenements and blind alleys; its numerous well-kept parks are brought to the homes and the very doorsteps of the rich and poor people alike. It does not need this park. The city might as well buy an iceberg from Alaska as this park. The gentleman from Tennessee [Mr. McMillin] spoke a moment ago about a monkey garden. The monkey is the central figure in the theory of evolution; and this project has evoluted as from the jelly- fish to the elephant. It was originally suggested that there should be a zoological garden attached to the Smithsonian Institute for all the animals of the United States. There would be plenty of room there for that. Then came the demand for an independent zoological park, with monkeys from Africa to gambol with the native buffalo, and the great American rattlesnake to play with the foreign boaconstrictor, while the native raccoon slept peacefully with the Numidian lion. 1204 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Then, from the zoological garden, pure and simple, came the grandly organized boom for Rock Creek Park. The monkey garden, true to its nature, has evoluted into this gigantic demand on the national taxpayer. The ‘‘greatest show on earth” can crowd under canvas, but the proposed zoo wants half a township. There is nothing mean about local enterprise when it can draw drafts on the United States Treasury. Where is this park to be located? The gentleman from South Carolina [Mr. Hemphill] grew eloquent and pathetic asking breathing places for the poor; but he asks us to put this park, not on the redeemed lands near the river, but away off in the region of the suffering and oppressed rich people, of whom you can not find enough to redeem Sodom remaining in the city, during the hot, sultry days of which he speaks. Where are the petitions from the great mass of the citizens for this park? If Dives demands, why does not Lazarus even petition? There is and can be no blackmail in raising the price of this land, because we do not want this park now nor will we ever want it in the future. If the backers of the movement want this land let them buy it them- selves. The people of the United States do not want it. Iam a true friend of this beautiful city and its people. The trouble is a few here undertake to speak for the majority. It is hard here to get gen- uine public opinion on local questions. In my opinion what is needed is good, old-fashioned, American local self-government. Let the people rule. Divorce this unnatural partnership between the District and United States Government. Let the people choose their rulers, and through them say what they want, and then put their hands in their own pockets and pay for it like the manly, inde- pendent Americans they claim to be. In the meantime down brakes, hard and strong, on speculative adventures at the expense, to a large extent, of the Federal taxpayers. ; The Speaker. The time of the gentleman has expired. Mr. Ciements. Mr. Speaker, I yield two minutes to the gentleman from West Virginia [Mr. Wilson]. Mr. Wiiui1am L. Winson, of West Virginia. Mr. Speaker, I do not want to participate in this discussion, but I have a great interest in questions affecting the District of Columbia, and in questions which are of great interest to my friend from Iowa [Mr. Henderson]. I have still a recollection of the strong comradeship that grew up between us in the last Congress when we had very hard battles over the District appropriations in the closing hours of the session. I have been called upon to confirm the statement made by the gentleman from Pennsyl- vania recently as to the origin of the appropriation for the water- works of the District of Columbia. That appropriation, Mr. Speaker, was not made upon the regular appropriation bill for the District of Columbia. It will be found in the statutes of the Forty-seventh Con- FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1205 gress in an independent act, which was approved on the 15th day of July, 1882, entitled ‘‘ Ansact to increase the water supply of the city of Washington, and for other purposes.” My recollection of the origin of that act is that it came to the House from the Senate; that it first passed at the other end of the Capitol and came to this House. I venture to make the statement that it was considered and reported to this House by the Committee on the Dis- trict of Columbia in the Forty-seventh Congress. Mr. Hempnityi. Will the gentleman state who was the chairman of ’ the Committee on the District of Columbia in that Congress? Mr. Wriison, of West Virginia. In the Forty-seventh Congress? I was not a member of that Congress. Mr. Ciements. Mr. Neal, of Ohio. - Mr. Witson, of West Virginia. Mr. Neal,-of Ohio, was chairman of that committee. My recollection is that this bill was passed at a night session devoted to the business of the District of Columbia. Mr. Butrrerworru. I understand that the fault is not in the law, but in the execution of the law. Mr. Wizson, of West Virginia. I was going to make that statement— that the trouble is not in the law so much as it is in its execution. Mr. James Bucuanan. The water supply has not been increased, but ‘‘the other purposes” have been faithfully carried on. Mr. Wuson, of West Virginia. The whole trouble has come from the plans adopted for a subterranean tunnel. If the plans proposed by General Meigs or those proposed by Colonel Casey had been adopted it would have been completed years ago and at an expense of not one- fourth of what has already been expended, which seems now to have been wasted, and an adequate water supply obtained for the elevated portions of the city of Washington. The SpeAKER. The time of the gentleman has expired. Mr. Ciements. I yield two minutes to the gentleman from Missouri [Mr. Bland]. Mr. Buanp. I only want a few minutes in which to enter my protest, inasmuch as these parks and Government reservations are under con- sideration, against the manner in which they are used and abused on public occasions; and I do not allude to the occasion of the present inauguration, but to four years past and since, and to every oppor- tunity since I have been a member of this House. We talk of the people of the United States, and of the benefit that they derive from these reservations and parks. It is said that the streets belong to the people of the United States; that the parks are the property of the people of the United States; that the public buildings belong to the people of the United States; and yet we see all these reservations partitioned off to-day with scantling for seats, ' where no citizen of the United States who comes to Washington can 1206 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. get a sight of the inauguration ceremonies without paying a high fee to the monopolists, whoever they are, wherbelong in this District. Now, if we are to have public parks ae the benefit of the people, and public streets and public reservations for the citizens of the United States, let us tear down the seats of these monopolists and let the free citizens of the United States have an opportunity of seeing the cele- brations on public occasions without having to contribute their money to these monopolists of this District, who undertake to crowd every- body out by their great structures upon our public reservations. Let us have free parks and free streets. The Speaker. The time allowed for debate has expired. The ques- tion is on agreeing to the report. Mr. Dresxe. I desire to move that the House recede from its dis- agreement. 7 The SpeakER. This is not the time to make that motion. Mr. Ciements. I ask the previous question on the adoption of the report. Mr. Hempnutin. That, I understand, relates only to those things that have been agreed upon. The Speaker. The report states that the conferees: have agreed as to certain matters and have disagreed as to certain other matters. If the report is adopted the matters upon which the conferees agree will be disposed of, and the other matters upon which they disagree will be open for the action of the House or for future conference. The previous question was ordered. The conference report was adopted. Mr. CLEMENTS moved to reconsider the vote by which the confer- ence report was adopted, and also moved that the motion to reconsider be laid on the table. The latter motion was agreed to. Mr. Herbert, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Randall, and Mr. Clements rose. Mr. Crements. Mr. Speaker, I wish to inquire whether or not the instructions proposed to be given by the resolution of the con from South Carolina [Mr. Hemphill] are pending. The Speaker. They are not. They have been read for informiatien Mr. Criements. Then I offer the resolution which I send to the desk. The resolution was read, as follows: Resolved, That in the opinion of this House the conferees on the part of the House on the District of Columbia appropriation bill should adhere to their action in con- ference of a disagreement as to this amendment. Mr. Hempninu. Does that relate to the park? The Speaker. The resolution does not mention any particular amendment. Mr. Henperson, of Iowa. That is offered as a substitute for the FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1207 resolution offered by the gentleman from South Carolina [Mr. Hemp- hill], I understand. The Speaker. That resolution was not formally. offered. It was read for information, but it is not pending. Mr. HENDERSON, iat Iowa. Now, Mr. Speaker, in order that the effect of the vote may be fully understood, I wish to say that, as I understand, an affirmative vote on the resolution offered by the gen- tleman from Georgia [Mr. Clements] will be a declaration against the zoological garden and against the park. The Spraxer. Undoubtedly. Mr. Ciements. I move to insert in the resolution, after the word ‘*amendment,” the words ‘*‘ numbered 124.” The motion was agreed to. Mr. Ciements. I demand the previous question on the adoption of the resolution. Mr. Diesie. Mr. Speaker The Spraker. For what purpose does the gentleman rise ? Mr. Diese. I rise to move that the House recede from its disagree- ment to the amendment numbered 124. Mr. Ranpauu. That is not in order. The Speaker. The motion to recede takes precedence, but in effect it is simply the converse of the other proposition, and a vote on either one settles the other. Mr. Dreste. I believe I have the floor. Mr. Ranpatu. The previous question has.been demanded. The Speaker. The previous question was demanded on the resolution; but pending that, the gentleman from South Carolina[Mr. Dibble] makes amotion which under the practice of parliamentary bodies has priority, a motion that the House recede from its disagreement. - As this motion tends to bring the two Houses to an agreement, it has precedence. Mr. Miiis. But has the gentleman the floor to debate the question when the previous question has been demanded? The SPEAKER. It was not demanded on this proposition, but on the resolution offered by the gentleman from Georgia. This is a motion of superior dignity. Mr. Dreste. I yield five minutes to the gentleman from Kentucky [Mr. Breckinridge]. Mr. Hempury. I would like to submit a motion to be read in con- nection with that already pending—a motion that the House recede with instructions The Speaker. The House can not recede ack instructions. The House can recede from its disagreement to an amendment, and can concur in the amendment with an amendment; but the House can not recede and at the same time instruct the conferees. 1208 . CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Mr. Witriam L. Scorr. I move that the House adjourn. Mr. Herpert. | hope that motion will not carry. I desire to ask that there be a session to-night for the consideration of the naval appropriation bill. The question being taken on the motion to adjourn, there were— ayes 87, noes 46. i Mr. Cuarues T. O’FERRALL. I call for the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were not ordered, there being—ayes 11, noes 85; less than one-fifth voting in the affirmative. So the motion to adjourn was agreed to; and accordingly (at 5 o’clock and 30 minutes p. m.) the House adjourned. February 28, 1889—House. The Speaker (Mr. Jonn G. Caruiste). The matter before the House is the motion made by the gentleman from South Carolina [Mr. Dibble], that the House recede from its disagreement to the Senate amendment numbered 124. Mr. Samuet Dripsue. | yield five minutes to the gentleman from Kentucky [Mr. Breckinridge]. Mr. S. J. Ranpauu. I rise to a parliamentary inquiry. The Speaker. The gentleman will state it. Mr. Ranpatu. On yesterday evening, during the confusion incident to the close of the session, the Chair recognized, pending a demand made by the gentleman from Georgia [Mr. Clements] for the previous question, the gentleman from South Carolina [Mr. Dibble] to make a motion to recede, which is equivalent to concurring. That, no doubt, was correctly made, and was a prior motion, because it tended to bring the two Houses together on legislation. But the gentleman from South Carolina [Mr. Dibble] took the floor and claimed the right to one hour for-debate. I want to direct the attention of the Chair to the fact that the effect of that was to take the gentleman from Georgia [Mr. Clements], in charge of the conference report, which he pre- sented, off the floor and dispossess him of control of that report when there had been no adverse vote by the House in so far as the control of that bill was concerned. The Speaker. The Chair thinks that it was undoubtedly correct to recognize the gentleman from South Carolina [Mr. Dibble] for the purpose of making the motion to recede from the disagreement, not- withstanding the fact that the gentleman from Georgia had at the time pending a proposition insisting on the disagreement, and had demanded the previous question. But the Chair, upon reflection, feels disposed to say that the gentleman from Georgia, under the practice heretofore prevailing in the House, was still entitled to the floor for the purpose of controlling the matter, having charge of the general subject, there having been no adverse action, and therefore the Chair thinks that the gentleman from South Carolina was not then entitled, under this usage, FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1209 to recognition for the purpose of debate, but the Chair actually recog- nized the gentleman from South Carolina, and he yielded to the gen- tleman from Kentucky five minutes. While the Chair thinks now this action was not strictly in accord- ance with the practice, the gentleman states that he will not occupy more time than would be allowed if the previous question was ordered, and the Chair wil] not undertake to reverse the action taken, but the Chair desires that the action taken yesterday shall not be a precedent. Mr. Ranpau. | am quite content that the proceedings shall go that way; but I wanted it just as the Chair has stated, not to go as a prec- edent, for I want to illustrate for a moment what the effect would be. There are 200 amendments to the sundry civil appropriation bill; and if any gentleman on this floor would have the right to make that motion of concurrence to each one of these amendments, in case they were reported back as disagreements, there would be many hours occupied, and it might take thirty days to reach a conclusion. The Speaker. The Chair sees the difficulty which might result from that practice. The gentleman from South Carolina yields five minutes to the gentleman from Kentucky. Mr. W. C. P. Brecxinriper, of Kentucky. I simply wanted to state in answer to certain statements made by certain gentlemen, and more particularly by my friend from Georgia [Mr. Blount], for whom I have great respect and whose statement ought not to go unchal- lenged, that there has been no haste in the presentation of this matter. It was introduced by my senatorial colleague from Kentucky [Mr. Beck] at the last session, and was put on the bill by the Senate at that session and discussed in this House. It was also introduced by me on December 17, and reported by the Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds. It has been considered, therefore, at both sessions of this Congress, and favorably reported by the proper committee of the House. There is, therefore, no ground for the statement that it has been suddenly and unexpectedly precipitated into this House at the tail end of the session. I want to make one more statement. This being the District of Columbia and under the power of Congress, the constitu- tional power is absolutely clear. The question is a pure question of expediency. There can be no lack of precedents when we walk down to the museums and the other public institutions here, and it is a clear question whether such expenditure of $200,000 is a wise expenditure when we are giving millions upon millions for public buildings in Washington. Iam not in favor of the national park nor of the pur- chase of a large tract of land under the pretense of a zoological park. Iappend the report of the Committee on Public Grounds, that the record may show the exact object in view. 1210 ' CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. There is absolute protection from jobbery in the fact that this is to be under the supervision of the Smithsonian Institution. At this period of the session I content myself with this statement. * * * * * * * Mr. Dresie. Mr. Speaker, the bill providing for the establishment of a zoological park in the District of Columbia was referred to the Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds, and, after due con- sideration, that committee determined to report it favorably to the House. I will print with my remarks the report of the committee, but in the meantime will state briefly, for the purpose of saving time, the reasons which induced the committee to recommend the passage of the bill. | In the first place, Mr..Speaker, the project as set forth in the bill is for the purchase of not less than 100 acres of land. As members will see from the design and plan in front of the reporter’s desk—— Mr. A. J. Hopkins, of Illinois. Will the gentleman permit a ques- tion ? Mr. Diseie. I must decline to be interrupted now, because my time is so limited. Otherwise I should be glad to hear the gentleman’s | question. . Mr. Hopkins, of Illinois. I merely wanted to ask the gentleman whether his remarks were directed to the amendment of his colleague, or, rather, that part of it embraced in the bill introduced in the House by the gentleman from Kentucky [Mr. Breckinridge], relating to the zoological garden ¢ Mr. Dresir. I am speaking to the zoological park bill, a bill reported by the Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds, in accordance with the design now in front of the reporter’s desk. Mr. Hopkins, of Lllinois. But does the amendment Mr. Drepie. Mr. Speaker, I have answered the gentleman’s ques- tion, and I must decline to yield further, although I would gladly do so if I had the time. This piece of land embraces about 120 acres. The bill provides for the purchase of not less than 100 acres. It is estimated, as the committee are informed, that the sum of $200,000 will purchase the land and will provide for the structures that will be immediately necessary. ° But, Mr. Speaker, even if the entire $200,000 were expended for thé land alone, gentlemen will tind that that would be a very reasonable price, because it can be ascertained by calculation that the cost per foot would be only about 43 cents, which is much less than property commands in that vicinity. Therefore I say that even if we purchase with this amount of money 100 acres of land it will cost us only 4$ cents per foot, and if we purchase 120 acres of course the cost per foot will be less; and I am informed, in fact, that a large portion of the land can be purchased at less than that price, so that the committee will be enabled by this appropriation FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1211 not only to purchase 20 acres in excess of the limit of the bill, but also to erect the necessary structures. The reason of this is that the ground is very undulating and there- fore is not so suitable for the erection of dwellings, as has been sug- gested by gentlemen who oppose this measure. It is just because of the natural beauty of the ground that it is not suitable for buildings, and the establishment of some such park is necessary for the purpose of preserving certain species of animals which are rapidly becoming extinct. Mr. Speaker, I shall not go into platitudes about the benefit of scientific education or the advantages of fostering scientific insti- tutions. We have the Smithsonian Institution. We are proud of the Smithsonian, and the Smithsonian has already, by gift, not by purchase, the nucleus of a collection. It has the buffalo; it has the white bear; it has-other animals which are passing away in this coun- try, and I am informed by the Secretary of the Smithsonian, Profes- sor Langley, that this place furnishes the right kind of location and the proper temperature for the propagation and perpetuation of these rapidly disappearing species of American animals, while at the same time it will serve the purposes of a public park. This is an enter- prise to be connected with a Government institution for a Govern- ment purpose, and I do not think that the Government should stand upon expending this small amount of money, in view of the important objects to be attained, especially when the property to be acquired will never depreciate in value, so that if the Government should here- after choose to abandon the experiment it will be able to get back its money two, three, or four fold. Mr. Wiiu1am H. Haron. As this subject has been before the gentle- man’s committee, will he state, for the information of the House, whether he wishes to be understood as saying that this $200,000 is all that is necessary to establish this zoological garden, or is this merely the first installment? Mr. Diepie. I am informed that the inquiries, estimates, and offers indicate that the 120 acres which is included in the design now in front of the reporter’s desk can be purchased for something less than $200,000; that is, for a sum which will leave enough to erect the structures necessary in the meantime for the accommodation of the animals. Of course there will have to be further appropriations in the future; and as to that gentlemen are informed from the estimates of others. I have not examined the subject; but the statement was made here’ yesterday that this will add about $25,00C a year, fora couple of years or so, to the annual appropriations for the Smithsonian Institution. Mr. Hinary A. HERBERT rose. Mr. Dresxe. I do not yield for further questions, and I do not wish to detain the House longer. I yield five minutes to my colleague [Mr. Hemphill]. [Cries of ‘‘ Vote!” ‘‘ Vote!”] 1212 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Mr. Joun J. Hemeniiy. I desire simply to submit an amendment to the amendment of my colleague [Mr. Dibble], which I will ask to have read. The Clerk read as follows: Amend by adding— ‘‘And agree to the same with an amendment as folows: “That the sum of $1,000,000, or so much thereof as may be necessary, be, and the same is hereby, appropriated, from any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to procure a national park in the District of Columbia of not less than 1,000 acres: Provided, That one-half of said sum shall be paid from the revenues of the District of Columbia and the balance from any money in the Treasury not other- wise appropriated: Provided further, That the abutting property that may be bene- ~ fited by the laying out of said park shall be charged with the amount of the increased value arising from the same, and the sum soassessed and recovered shall be returned to the United States Treasury and the District of Columbia in the proportion in which their funds are herein appropriated.’”’ Mr. Ranpatu. I do not think that proposition is in order as an amendment to the proposition of the gentleman from South Carolina [Mr. Dibble]. The Speaker. The gentleman from Pennsylvania makes a point of order against this amendment. The Chair thinks that while no point of order can be made in the House against any provision inserted in a conference report, except upon the ground that it changes or strikes out some provision previously agreed to by both Houses, yet when the House itself comes to adopt amendments to Senate amendmerts, the amendments offered here must be germane and are governed by the rules which govern the ordinary proceedings of the House in the con- sideration of appropriation bills. Mr. Ranpauu. The point I make, however, is that this amendment is not admissible as an amendment to the amendment of the gentleman from South Carolina, for it would not have been in order originally in the House. The SPEAKER. This is a proposition to agree to a Senate amendment with an amendment which the Chair thinks is not germane to the Sen- ate amendment. . Mr. Hemeniwy. If | change my proposition so as to provide for a zoological park of 1,000 acres, will not that be in order? The Speaker. Anything relating to the zoological park, which is the subject of the Senate amendment, would be in order if germane to the provisions of that amendment, which the Chair has not yet read. Mr. Hempuiiy. I modify my amendment by striking out ‘‘ national park” and inserting *‘ zoological park.” Mr. Ranpatu. I submit that the gentleman can not do indirectly what he can not do directly. The Speaker. The gentleman from South Carolina [Mr. Hemp- hill] proposes now to withdraw his previous proposition and offer one ; _ FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1213 for the purchase of a zoological park, which is the subject of the Sen- - ate amendment, as the Chair understands, though he has not read the amendment of the Senate. Mr. James BucHanan. It seems to me that the proposition, even as modified by the gentleman from South Carolina, is subject to another point of order. I submit that it involves new legislation, because it provides that a certain proportion of this expense shall be borne by the owners of the adjacent property. The Speaker. The Chair has not yet read the Senate amendment himself; he will examine it. Mr. Ranpatu. I desire to call attention to this point—that the propo- sition now presented would not in my judgment have been in order if it had originated in the House as an amendment to this bill before it went to the Senate. The Speaker. That is the very point which the Chair is examining; for the Chair thinks, as he has already stated, that if the committee of conference should embrace in its report to the House an agreement upon some proposition which would not have been in order in the House originally, a point of order could not be made against it; but when it is proposed that the House shall concur in a Senate amend- ment with an amendment, the latter must be of such a character that it would have been in order if the original proposition were before the House. Upon this ground the Chair thinks that the amendment offered by the gentleman from South Carolina is not in order. Mr. Hempuity. On what grounds? The Spraker. On the ground that it would not have been in order in the House in the consideration of this bill originally; and it is not in order simply as an amendment to the Senate amendment, because it propgses to change existing law in regard to the payment for this property. The law now provides that the expenditures in connection with the District shall be borne one-half by the United States and one- half by the District of Columbia. Mr. Hempuiiy. I then withdraw that part of my proposition which proposes to assess owners of adjoining property. The Spraker. If the amendment in the shape now offered relates simply to the purchase of a park for zoological purposes, the Chair thinks it is in order; beyond that it is not. Mr. Hempuity. | withdraw all except that part of the proposition. Mr. Ranpatu. I call for the yeas and nays. Mr. Bucuanan. I desire to inquire of the Chair whether the amend- ment of the gentleman from South Carolina as now modified does anything to enlarge the Senate amendment except in the matter of price ? The Spraker. That is all; but that is a matter for the House; it does not present any question of order. 1214 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. | . Mr. Bucrkanan. I did not raise a question of order; I submitted a parliamentary inquiry. Mr. Ranpatu. I am unwilling to permit this amendmen to be dis- posed of without a statement on my part that I deny the right of a conference committee to originate, either directly or indirectly, a proposition on a subject which was never considered by either House when the bill was passed by the respective Houses. The Speaker. The Chair does not say that a conference committee has the right to originate legislation on a subject not previously con- sidered in either House. Mr. Haren. I rise to a parliamentary inquiry. The Speaker. The gentleman will state it. Mr. Harcn. I ask whether the Chair has decided the point of order. The SprEaker. The Chair has decided it. Mr. Harcu. The point of order is that the motion of the gentleman from South Carolina, that the House recede from its disagreement, is not amendable. The Speaker. The effect of receding i is to concur in the amendment, but the gentleman from South Carolina [Mr. Hemphill] moves to amend it by agreeing with an amendment. Mr. Ranpatu. The effect will be to involve the Government of the United States in the expenditure of many bundreds of thousands of dollars. The Speaker. The question is on the amendment moved by the gentleman from South Carolina | Mr. Hemphill }. Mr. Ranpauu. Let us have the yeas and nays on that. Mr. Hempniuu. I believe my time has not expired. The Speaker. The gentleman has five minutes of his time remaining. Mr. Drpsxe. I rise to a parliamentary inquiry. The Speaker. The gentleman will state it. Mr. Dizeste. I desire the amendment to be read for the information of the House. The Speaker. It will be read if gentlemen will resume their seats and preserve order. The Clerk read as follows: And agree to the same with an amendment as follows: That $1,000,000, or so much thereof as may be necessary, be, and the same is hereby, appropriated, from any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to purchase a zoological garden in the District of Columbia of not less than 1,000 acres: Provided, One-half of said sum shall be paid from the revenues of the District of Columbia, and the balance from any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated. Mr. HEMPHILL rose. Mr. Bucuanan. Will the gentleman yield to me for a qpeshoms Mr. Hemeniwe. Certainly. Mr. Bucuanay. Is it not a fact the pr oposition, 2 as the ventlenita FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1215 now offers it, is an increase in the amount the Senate put on the bill from $200,000 to a million of dollars; and is it not the fact further that instead of purchasing 200 acres, as the Senate recommends, it provides for the purchase of over a thousand acres? A Memprr. Eighteen hundred acres. — Mr. Hemenity. Mr. Speaker, the object of the proposition sub- * mitted to the House, and upon which it is called to vote, is to procure ' a suitable park for this city. Ido not say the city needs it especially now, but it will need it if it continues to grow, and this is the proper time to getit. It is not only a proper expenditure, but it is economy to do it, for if this Rock Creek is allowed to flow through the city and be an open sewer to the people along its banks it will cost us not only more in the loss of health, but in money, than the expenditure here — proposed. ; Mr. Ranpatu. There is no healthier city on the Atlantic coast than the city of Washington. Mr. Hempuitt. There is a difference of opinion about that. If it be true that it is the healthiest city on the Atlantic coast, then it is the duty of Congress to keep itso. In one part of the city this stream is so polluted that it has become a stench to everybody living along its banks. Mr. Benzamin A. Entoxr. Will the gentleman yield to me for a question ? Mr. Hempeniiy. Certainly. Mr. Enitor. Would the gentleman have any objection to agreeing to an amendment to his amendment providing for the distribution among members of Congress of the increase of animals in this zoolog- ical garden, to be franked through the mails by members of Congress to their constituents ? Mr. Hempniiu. That has nothing at all to do with it, any more than the flowers that bloom in the spring have. The question is whether this city shall have a park like every other city, or whether it shall not. Mr. Diese. Let me call attention to the fact that if the proposition prevails in its present shape you will not only appropriate $200,000 for a zoological park, but you will appropriate in addition $1,000,000 for another zoological park. What I want to say is, so far as the zoological park is concerned, $200,000 is all that is asked and all that is needed to purchase the ground desired for that purpose. That appro- priation is accomplished by voting for the motion I made to recede from disagreement to amendment 124, as published in the Record. That will accomplish the plan in front of the official reporter’s desk. Mr. Ciements. I demand the previous question. ‘Mr. Dress. I promised to yield to the gentleman from Maryland [Mr. Compton]. T2LG CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. The Speaker. There are two minutes remaining. Mr. Ranpatu. I do not know that the gentleman has any time under the decision of the Chair. Mr. Dresue. I ask how long a time I have occupied ? The Speaker. There have been over thirty minutes consumed; but a part of the time, it is true, was in the discussion of the point of order. ‘The Chair understands the gentleman from Maryland to desire only ~ two or three minutes. Mr. Ciements. As the gentleman is a member of the District Com- mittee and wants but a short time I shall not make any objection. . Mr. Barnes Compton. Mr. Speaker, I regret very much that my col- - league on the committee has seen proper to press this proposition at - this time. For one, sir, as a member of the Committee on the District of Columbia, I have never been in favor of this scheme for a national park. I have never, I will confess, expressed my views fully in the committee, or stated the opposition that I had to it, as perhaps I should have done in view of my position, because I never expected to be called upon to debate the proposition before the House. I supposed from the action taken by the committee that the proposition would never come before the House for consideration at all, and hence that it was unnecessary to interpose objection at that time. But as it is here now, I feel impelled to say what my views are on the subject. In the first place, I maintain that no city can be found on this con- tinent or elsewhere where the demand for a park of this nature nas so little weight or is entitled to so little consideration as in this city. Why, look around your great capital and what do you see? Here are the Arlington Heights within easy reach, the Soldiers’ Home in our immediate vicinity; here are four railroads running in every direction leading from the capital city of the nation; here are our street rail- roads running on almost every street that points to your center; here are the various city parks, the broad streets, beautified with shade trees and broad, ample walks, perhaps to a greater extent than any city in this country. Mr. PoInpEXTER Dunn. Or any other. Mr. Compton. And while I do not charge, because I do not know, that there is a real-estate scheme behind this, and I do know, sir, that my honored colleague and those associated with him in the Committee on the District of Columbia have no knowledge of it or any apprehen- sion of such a state of things, still, sir, there is one thing which can not be denied, and that is that this will add immensely to the real- estate boom in the immediate vicinity of where this park is to be located. Mr. Bucuanan. And add to the taxes in every other part. Mr. Compton. In conclusion, but a single word. My friend, Mr. Dibble, of South Carolina, has, in my judgment, struck the keynote FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1217 of this whole controversy; that is to say, that the national park is a park for the city of Washington, while the zoological park is a park for the nation at large, and as between the two I am for the zoological park as against the other. The Speaker. The question is on ordering the’previous question on the report of the committee and the amendment of the gentleman from South Carolina. The previous question was ordered. The Speaker, The first question is on the proposition submitted by the gentleman from South Carolina |[Mr. Hemphill], which will be again read, if there be no objection. Mr. Ranpa.u. I object to its being again read. ~The Speaker. The Chair understands the gentleman from Pennsy1- vania to demand the yeas and nays. Mr. Ranpatu. I will take the vote first by sound and division. The question was taken; and the Speaker stated that the ‘‘ noes ” seemed to prevail. Mr. Hemeniiy. Let us have a division. The House proceeded to divide; and the Speaker announced—ayes 5(-—— Before the negative vote was counted, Mr. CLemeEnts said: I demand the yeas and nays. Mr. Hempuiny. That is not necessary; let this vote decide. Mr. CLemMEnts and others. Yes; it is necessary. The yeas and nays were ordered. Mr. Netson. I rise to a parliamentary inquiry. Are we voting upon the amendment of the gentleman from South Carolina [Mr. Hemphill]? The Speaker. That is the pending amendment. Mr. Bensamin ButrerwortH. We are to vote, for the $200,000 proposition now, or the $1,000,000 proposition, which? | The Speaker. The $1,000,000 proposition. The Spraxer. The yeas and nays have been ordered, and the Clerk will call the roll. The question is on the amendment of the gentleman from South Carolina |[Mr. Hemphill]. The question was taken; and it was decided in the negative—yeas, 94; nays, 131; not voting, 98. Mriendiient was rejected.. The Speaker pro tempore (Mr. W. H. Hatcu). The question recurs on the motion of the gentleman from South Carolina that the House recede from its disagreement to the Senate amendment numbered 124. Mr. CLEMEntTs. On that I demand the yeas and nays. H. Doc. 732——77 . 1218 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Mr. Wiuiiam H. Sowpen. [I request that the amendment be reported, so that we may know how to vote. Mr. Dresux. A parliamentary inquiry. The SpEakeER pro tempore. The gentleman will state it. ° Mr. Diresux. The question I desire to ask is whether a vote ‘‘ aye” now is an agreement to an expenditure of $200,000 for a zoological garden, reported by the Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds? The SPEAKER pro tempore. That is the pending question. The gen- tleman from South Carolina submitted a motion to the House that the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 124, appropriating $200,000 for a zoological garden, and upon that question the gentleman from Georgia demands the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The question was taken; and it was decided in the affirmative—yeas, 131; nays, 98; not voting, 94. So the House receded from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate numbered 124, and the act passed the House, including a provision for the establishment of the zoological park. 1889, March 2. District of Columbia act for 1890. Src. 4. For the establishment of a zoological park in the District of Columbia, $200,000, to be expended under and in accordance with the provisions following, that is to say: That in order to establish a zoological park in the District of Colum- bia, for the advancement of science and the instruction and recreation of the people, a commission shall be constituted, composed of three persons, namely: The Secretary of the Interior, the president of the Board of Commissioners of the District of Columbia, and the Secre- tary of the Smithsonian Institution, which shall be known and desig- nated as the commission for the establishment of a zoological park. That the said commission is hereby authorized and directed to make an inspection of the country along Rock Creek, between Massachu- setts avenue extended and where said creek is crossed by the road leading west from Brightwood crosses said creek, and to select from that district of country such a tract of land, of not less than 100 acres, which shall include a section of the creek, as said commission shall deem to be suitable and appropriate for a zoological park. That the said commission shall cause to be made a careful map of said zoological park, showing the location, quantity, and character of each parcel of private property to be taken for such purpose, with the names of the respective owners inscribed thereon, and the said map FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1219 shall be filed and recorded in the public records of the District of Columbia; and from and after that date the several tracts and parcels . of land embraced in such zoological park shall be held as condemned for public uses, subject to the payment of just compensation, to be determined by the said commission and approved by the President of the United States, provided that such compensation be accepted by the owner or owners of the several parcels of land. That if the said commission shall be unable to purchase any portion of the land so selected and condemned within thirty days after such condemnation, by agreement with the respective owners, at the price approved by the President of the United States, it shall, at the expira- tion of such period of thirty days, make application to the supreme court of the District of Columbia, by petition, at a general or special term, for an assessment of the value of such land, and said petition shall contain a particular description of the property selected and con- demned, with the name of the owner or owners thereof, and his, her, or their residences, as far as the same may be ascertained, together with a copy of the recorded map of the park; and the said court is hereby authorized and required, upon such application, without delay, to notify the owners and occupants of the land and to ascertain and assess the value of the land so selected and condemned by appointing three commissioners to appraise the value or values thereof, and to return the appraisement to the court; and when the values of such land are thus ascertained and the President shall deem the same rea- sonable, said values shall be paid to the owner or owners, and the United States shall be deemed to have a valid title to said lands. That the said commission is hereby authorized to call upon the superintendent of the Coast and Geodetic Survey or the Director of the Geological Survey to make such surveys as may be necessary to carry into effect the provisions of this section; and the said officers are hereby authorized and required to make such surveys under the direction of said commission. (Stat., XXV, 808.) AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION. May 21, 1888—Senate. _ My. G. F. Hoar introduced a bill (S. 2986) to incorporate the Amer- ican Historical Association. Referred to Committee on the Library. May 25, 1888—Senate. Reported by Mr. G. F. Hoar. June 1, 1888—Senate. Amended and passed. June 4, 1888—House. A bill (H. 10323) introduced by Mr. J. Phelan. Referred to Committee on the Library. 1230 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. July 28, 1888—House. Mr. R. H. M. Davripson, of Florida, from Committee on the Library, submitted report (H. 3101), on bill (H. 10328): The committee have had this bill under consideration. The Amer- ican Historical Association embraces about 400 of the best historical specialists in America, who are engaged in promoting the historical interests of the whole country. The bill has been carefully drawn, with the full understanding of the Secretary of the Smithsonian Insti- tution. The Association asks for no money, but merely wants a local establishment in the District of Columbia. The committee recommend the passage of the bill. W. G. STAHLNECKER. R. H. M. Davipson. Referred to House Calendar. December 17, 1888—House. Mr. James Puenan. Mr. Speaker, I ask by unanimous consent to take from the House Calendar the bill (H. 10323) to incorporate the American Historical Association, and to put it upon its passage. The Speaker (Jonn G. Caruistx). Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from Tennessee for the present consideration of this bill? Mr. W. M. Sprincer. I will not object if it is understood that the consideration of the bill shall be concluded within ten minutes. Mr. Puewan. I am willing to agree to that. There was no objection, and it was ordered accordingly. Mr. PHELAN. I offer an amendment, which I ask the Clerk to read. The Clerk read as follows: After the words ‘‘real and personal estate,’ in lines 14 and 15, insert the words ‘“in the District of Columbia.’’? Also, in line 17, strike out the word ‘‘headquar- ters’’ and insert the words ‘‘ principal office.”’ Mr. C. D. Kincors. I wish to ask the gentleman in charge of this bill whether it carries an appropriation 4 Mr. PHetan. None. Mr. Kincorr. And they do not propose to come before the next Congress and ask an appropriation 4 Mr. PHELAN. No, sir. ; Mr. Kincore. Then I have no objection to the bill. The amendment was agreed to and bill passed. December 17, 1888—Senate. The bill (H. 10323) to incorporate the American Historical Associa- tion was read twice by its title: That Andrew D. White, of Ithaca, in the State of New York; George Bancroft, of Washington, in the District of Columbia; Justin Winsor, of Cambridge, in the State of Massachusetts; William F. Poole, of Chicago, in the State of Illinois; Herbert B. Adams, of Baltimore, in the State of Maryland; Clarence W. Bowen, of Brooklyn, ie FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1221 in the State of New York, their associates and successors, are hereby created a body corporate and politic, by the name of the American Historical Association, for the promotion of historical studies, the collection and preservation of historical manu- scripts, and for kindred purposes in the interest of American history and of history in America. Said association is authorized to hold real and personal estate in the District of Columbia to an amount not exceeding $500,000, to adopt a constitution and to make by-laws. Said association shall have its principal office at Washington, in the District of Columbia, and shall hold its annual meetings in such places as the said incorporators shall determine. Said association shall report annually to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution concerning its proceedings and the condition of historical study in America. Said Secretary shall communicate to Congress the whole of such reports, or such portion thereof as he shall see fit. The Regents of the Smithsonian Institution are authorized to permit said association to deposit its collections, manuscripts, books, pamphlets, and other material for history in the Smithsonian Institution or in the National Museum, at their discretion, upon such conditions and under such rules as they shall prescribe. ‘Mr. G. F. Hoar. That bill is in substance a bill which has already passed the Senate. The American Historical Association is a very important body, a meeting of which is to be held in this city in the course of two or three weeks, and I should like the leave of the Senator who has the tariff bill in charge to allow it to pass at this time. The President pro tempore (Mr. J. J. Inaauus). It will be read at length for information. The bill was read at length. Mr. G. F. Epmunps. Has that bill been reported from a committee of the Senate ? Mr. Hoar. That bill is in substance the same as a bill reported from the Library Committee which has ‘passed the Senate. The House bill has come here, the only difference being that the House thought fit to limit the place of allowing ownership of the real estate to the District -of Columbia, while the Senate bill allows them to hold it anywhere. Mr. Epmunps. I see that the first meeting is to be held in the Dis- trict of Columbia, and after that wherever the stockholders choose to meet, which raises to my mind a pretty serious question as to how far the power of Congress may go into the States to create corporations all over the country; and I should wish, unless there is some very immediate and urgent reason to the contrary, that the bill should go to a committee. Mr. Hoar. There is an immediate and urgent reason which I stated, and that is that the American Historical Association is one of the most important learned bodies in the country, composed, as the Senator will see from the names of the corporators, of very distinguished scholars. I know a good deal about the gentlemen composing it. Their plan is to have their meetings in different parts of the country, just as the American Institute [ Association] for the Advancement of Science have, but their headquarters and their collections are to be deposited in the District of Columbia, and their first meeting is to be held here. [229 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. The fact that they will hold meetings about the country to interest the people in the different cities in their work does not give it any the less a national character. Mr. Epmunps. I think we had better see the bill in print, not that I have the slightest objection to this particular thing, because it is a most useful and I dare say valuable arrangement, but it would make avery strong precedent for incorporating business corporations with power to do business all over the country, and I think the bill ought to be printed so as to give us a chance to look at it. The PrEsIDENT pro tempore. Shall the bill be referred to a com- mittee or lie on the table? Mr. Hoar. My honorable friend the chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary has himself recently promoted the formation of a corporation whose whole business is to be done at Nicaragua, outside of the United States, and it strikes me that this objection is a little hypercritical, but I have no objection to the reference if he desire it. Mr. Epmunps. I may say in reply to my honorable friend from Massachusetts that I have promoted to the best of my ability a cor- poration to be incorporated by Congress to carry on business in Nica- ragua, which I think is an entirely different thing from Congress incorporating a body of people to carry on business anywhere in the United States, for I believe it concerns our foreign relations and, in a very broad sense, the public welfare. That is within the Constitution, and I do not think there is any comparison in respect of the power of Congress to create a corporation to colonize Africa, if you please, or to build a canal through Nicaragua or Panama and a corporation to do business in the State of Kansas or of Massachusetts or of Vermont. So I must say, with great respect to my honorable friend, that I think his implied criticism of my inconsistency is entirely unfounded. The PresIDENT pro tempore. Shall the bill be referred to a com- mittee or lie on the table? ‘ Mr. Epmunps. I move that it be referred to the proper committee. The PrestpENT pro tempore. It will be referred to the Committee on the Library, if there be no objection, and printed. December 19, 1888—Senate. Mr. Wiit1am M. Evarts. I am instructed by the Committee on the Library, to which was referred the bill (H. 10323) to incorporate the American Historical Association, to report it with amendments, which are rather in reference to the exactitude of expression than otherwise. I ask that the bill may be .put upon its passage. The Senate passed a bill at the last session equivalent to this, and the House has passed this bill. The changes here made, as will appear from the reading of the amendments which I send up, are merely as to the exactitude of phrases. The President pro tempore (Mr. J. J. Incautus). The Senator from FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1223 New York asks that the bill just reported by him may be now considered. Mr. G. F. Epmunps. Let it be read at length for information, with the amendments reported by the committee. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. It will be read at length, with the amendments proposed by the committee, subject to objection. The Chief Clerk read the bill as proposed to be amended. The PrEsIDENT pro tempore. Is there objection to the present con- sideration of the bill? If there be none, it is before the Senate, as in Committee of the Whole, and having been read at length the amend- ments proposed by the committee will be stated. The amendments reported by the Committee on the Library -were: In line 9, after the word ‘‘created,” to insert ‘‘in the District of Columbia;” in line 15, after the word ‘‘ Columbia,” to insert ‘‘so far only as may be necessary to its lawfyl ends;” in line 17, after the word ‘* by-laws,” to insert ‘‘ not inconsistent with law;” ahd at the end of line 18, before the word ‘‘ hold,” to strike out ‘‘ shall” and insert 66 may. ” The amendments were agreed to. The bill was reported. to the Senate as suited, the amendments were concurred in, and the bill passed. December 20, 1888—Senate. Mr. G. F. Hoar. I notice that the Secretary, in eee the Journal, read the title of the bill reported by the Senator from New York [Mr. Evarts] as a bill to incorporate the American Historical Society. I wish the Secretary would be kind enough to see whether the bill is so journalized. . The title is the American Historical Association. The President pro tempore (Mr. J. J. Incas). The entry will be read. The Secretary read as follows: Mr. Evarrs, from the Committee on the Library, to whom was referred the bill (H. R. 10323) to incorporate the American Historical Society, reported it with amendments. Mr. Hoar. The bill is to incorporate the American Historical Asso ciation. The préper correction should be made. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The title of the bill will be ascertained and the Journal entry made to correspond therewith. January 4, 1889. An act, ete. Be it enacted, etc., That Andrew ‘D. White, of Ithaca, in the State of New York; George Bancroft, of Washington, in ae District of Columbia; Justin. Winsor, of Cambridge, in the State of Massachu.- setts; William F. Poole, of Chicago, in the State of Illinois; Herbert B. Adams, of Baltimore, in the State of Maryland; Clarence W. 1224 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Bowen, of Brooklyn, in the State of New York, their associates and successors, are hereby created in the District of Columbia a body cor- porate and politic, by the name of the American Historical Association, for the promotion of historical studies, the collection and preservation of historical manuscripts, and for kindred purposes in the interest of American history and of history in America. Said association is authorized to hold real and personal estate in the District of Columbia so far only as may be necessary to its lawful ends to an amount not exceeding $500,000, to adopt a constitution, and to make by-laws not inconsistent with law. Said association shall have its principal office at Washington, in the District of Columbia, and may hold its annual meetings in such places as the said incorporators su.all determine. Said association shall report annually to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution concerning its proceedings and the condition of historical study in America. Said Secretary shall communicate to Congress the whole of such reports or such portion thereof as he shall see fit. The Regents of the Smithsonian Institution are authorized to permit said association to deposit its collections, manuscripts, books, pamphlets, and other material for history in the Smithsonian Institution or in the National Museum; at their discretion, upon such conditions and under such rules as they shall prescribe. (Stat., X XV, 640.) FIREPROOFING SMITHSONIAN BUILDING. May 21, 1888—Senate. Mr. J. 5. Morrmu. I am directed by the Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds to report a bill (S. 2972) to provide for making the west end of the Smithsonian Institution fireproof and for other purposes, which has been requested by the Secretary of the Smith- sonian Institution. That for the purpose of making the roof of the Gothic chapel at the west end of the Smithsonian building fireproof, and for other purposes, under the direction of the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, the sum of $17,500, or so much thereof as may be necessary, is hereby appropriated out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated. Mr. Morriuu. I am also directed by the committee to ask for imme- diate consideration of the bill. The President pro tempore (Mr. J. J. InGauus). Is there objection ? There being no objection, the Senate, as in Committee of the Whole, proceeded to consider the bill. Mr. Morrill explained the object of the bill. A citizen of the United States, long resident abroad, proposed to give to the Smith- sonian Institution a very large collection of armor from the Middle FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1225 Ages—some of it connected with the most eminent historical names— including horse armor, helmets, swords, and all the paraphernalia of ancient warfare. These objects, numbering some 5,000, had been collected at vast expense, and the collection was said to be the most valuable collection of the kind in the world. The condition of the presentation was that the Smithsonian Institution would furnish a fire- proof building for its protection. Passed. May 22, 1888—House. The bill (S. 2972) to provide for making the west end of the Smith- sonian building fireproof, and for other purposes, referred to Com- mittee on Public Buildings and Grounds. June 28, 1888—Senate. Mr. J. S. Morrini, from Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds, reported an amendment to be proposed to the sundry civil bill for 1889 (H. 10540): For the purpose of making the roof of the Gothic chapel at the west end of the Smithsonian building fireproof, and for other purposes, under the direction of the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, $17,500. Referred to Committee on Appropriations. February 19, 1889—Senate. The sundry civil bill for 1890 being under consideration, an amend- ment was proposed, on page 40, after line 8, to insert: Repairs, Smithsonian building: To make fireproof the roof of the Gothic chapel at the west end of the Smithsonian building and for other portions of the roof of said building, $17,500; to be expended under the charge of the Architect of the Capitol, according to the direction of the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. Agreed to. VAIL TELEGRAPHIC INSTRUMENT. May 22, 1888—House. Mr. W. W. Pue tps introduced a bill (H. 10110) authorizing the purchase of the original telegraphic instrument. Referred to Committee on the Library. DOCUMENTS. June 7, 1888—Senate. Mr. Francis M. CockrE tu introduced a bill (S. 3068) providing for the distribution of public documents to depositories and other public libraries, which provided that one copy of each document printed by order of Congress, bound in cloth, should be sent to the Smithsonian Institution. Referred to Committee on Printing. 1226 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. NATIONAL MUSEUM—NEW BUILDING. June 12, 1888—Senate. - Mr. J. S. Morrmz, from Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds, reported a bill (S. 3134): That the sum of $500,000 is hereby appropriated, out of any money in the Treas- ury not otherwise appropriated, or so much thereof as may be necessary, for the erection of a fire-proof building for the use of the National Museum, to cover 300 feet square, and to consist of two stories and basement, to be erected under the direction of the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in accordance with the plans now on file with the Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds, on the southwestern portion of the grounds of the Smithsonian Institution. Said building to be placed west of the Smithsonian Institution, leaving a roadway between it and the latter of not less than 40 feet, with the north front on a line with the south face of the build- ing of the Agricultural Department and of the Smithsonian Institution; and all expenditures for the purpose herein mentioned shall be audited by the proper officers of the Treasury Department. Mr. Morri1z, from the same committee, submitted a report (S. 1539) to accompany bill (S. 3134): To demonstrate the pressing necessity for additional accommodations for the vast amount of materials which has been accumulated for exhi- bition in the National Museum, it will perhaps be sufficient to present the communication of the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, and the statements made showing the immense number of entries to the catalogues of the Museum since 1882. The plans presented, viz, the basement, gr ound floor, at sodatiee story plans, with front plesiiiod: do not give all the dncomiaed fea- tures of the building, but are complete enough to be the subject of careful estimates, and although competitive estimates have not been made, the estimators on these figures agree to give bonds that the work shall be efficiently done without exceeding the amount. It is probable if the work is let out by contract that it would be completed for some- thing considerably less, Your committee therefore recommend the passage of the bill. SMITHSONIAN InstituTION, Unirep Srares Nationa Museum, Washington, June 2, 1888. My Dear Sir: I send herewith, in accordance with your suggestion, a plan of one. of the floors of the proposed Museum building, together with a perspective drawing in color on a smaller scale. I hayealso plans for the basement and first floor together with an elevation and transverse section. These are at your service if you desire them. They have been prepared with the utmost care and represent the results of an exhaustive study, which has extended over several years, of the plans of the best modern museum buildings in Europe and America, nearly all of which have been personally inspected by officers of the Smithsonian Institution. The building, as proposed, covers the same area as the present Museum, but is intended to consist of two stories and a basement, thus affording nearly three times as much accommodation under the same area of roof as the building now in use. The arrangement of the interior of the proposed new structure is, however, consid- erably modified as the result of the experience of seven years’ occupation of the FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1227 present building. The eighteen exhibition halls on the two main floors are com- pletely isolated from each other and are capable of subdivision into smaller halls. The lighting will be equally as good as in the present building, the ventilation will be much better, and in other important respects the sanitary arrangements will be far more satisfactory. A basement story is absolutely necessary, not only with a view to promoting the comfort and health of visitors and employees as well as for securing greater dryness and better preservation of the specimens, but also for the purpose of providing large apartments for storerooms and workshops. These proposed improvements in arrange- ment will not, however, interfere with the possibility of constructing a building which shall conform in the essential points of exterior proportion with the main features of the present building. The present building contains about 80,000 square feet of floor space available for exhibition and storage. The building proposed will contain about 220,000 square feet. The amount of room for offices and laboratories would be about the same in each. The net area in the new building available for exhibitions, storage, and office rooms, as estimated, would be between 5 and 6 acres. For the construction of the present Museum building an appropriation of $250,000 was made. This sum was supplemented by the following special appropriations: $25,000 for steam-heating apparatus; $26,000 for marble floors; $12,500 for water and gas fixtures and electrical apparatus, and $1,900 for special sewer connections. The total amount expended on this building was therefore $315,400, and it is generally admitted that the cost of its construction was considerably cheaper than that of any other similar building in existence; in fact, perhaps too cheap to secure the truest economy. The proposed structure can be erected at a proportionately smaller cost. I have obtained from responsible bidders, who are willing to give bonds for the completion of the work in accordance with the bids which they have submitted, estimates for the erection of the building complete, with steam-heating apparatus and all other essential appliances excepting the electrical equipment, amounting in the aggregate to $473,000; bids upon which the estimates of cost have been made were not com- petitive, and it is possible that something may be saved through competition. It is, however, necessary to provide also for the architect’s superintendence, and for the removal and reconstruction of the Smithsonian stable, which now occupies the site. I therefore think it advisable to make request for the sum of $500,000, in order that these additional items and other contingencies may be covered. The sketches of the exterior of the proposed building were made in great haste, and by no means exhibit its architectural possibilities. The main entrance is far less imposing, for instance, than a proper arrangement of the steps and arches would make it. The ‘‘lovore,’’ or dormer windows, which will appear in the roof, are absent, and the variety of color, which in the actual building will be given by the use of colored brick and terra cotta, is not shown. I am, sir, your obedient servant, Hon. J. S. Morriit, United States Senate, Washington. P.S. With the other plans herewith transmitted I send a copy of the plan of the Smithsonian grounds, showing the location of the present buildings and that of the proposed structure, whose site is indicated by a dotted line. S. P. Lanarey, Secretary. Unirep Sratres Natronat Museum, Washington, June 7, 1888. My Dear Sr: I take pleasure in responding to your request for information con- cerning the character and extent of the material which renders necessary the con- struction of a new building for the accommodation of the National Museum. 1228 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Since the erection of the present Museum building there have been more than 12,000 accessions to the collections, chiefly by gifts. From the year 1859 to 1880 the accessions numbered 8,475. It is thus evident that within the last eight years the number of accessions has been half as large again as during the previous twenty-one. Many of the more recent accessions are of very great extent, as for instance the bequest of the late Isaac Lea, of Philadelphia, which contains 20,000 specimens of shells, besides minerals and other objects; the Jeffreys collection of fossil and recent shells of Europe, including 40,000 specimens; the Stearns collection of mollusks, numbering: 100,000 specimens; the Riley collection of insects, containing 150,000 specimens; the Catlin collection of Indian paintings, about 500 in number; the col- lection of the American Institute of Mining Engineers, for the transportation of which to Washington several freight cars were required. There are also the extensive collections obtained at.the Fisheries Exhibitions at Berlin and London, and at the close of the New Orleans Cotton Centennial; the Shepard collection of meteorites; the Wilson collection of archzeological objects (more than 12,000 specimens); the Lorillard collection of Central American antiqui- ties, and very many others nearly as extensive. In addition to these are the annual accretions from the work of the United States Fish Commission, the United States Geological Survey, and the Bureau of Ethnology, as well as the contributions from several expeditions of the Government, from army and navy officers, and from other Government officials. These are very extensive and are yearly increasing in bulk and value. In the Armory building are stored many hundreds of boxes of valuable material which we have not room to unpack, and the great vaults under the Smithsonian building and many of the attic and tower rooms are similarly occupied. For several important departments of the Museum no exhibition space whatever is available, and no portion of the collection can be publicly displayed. Indeed, the growth of many of the departments is in large measure prevented by the fact that we have no room for additional exhibition cases, or even forstorage. Many valuable collections elsewhere than in Washington are at the service of the Museum, but we have no space for their reception. At the close of the last fiscal year (June 30, 1887) a very careful estimate showed that the collections were sixteen times as great in number of specimens as in the year 1882. I desire to call your attention especially to the inclosed statement bearing upon this point. The Museum is growing, as it is fitting that the national museum of a great country. should grow, and it is not only necessary to care for what is already here, but to pro- vide for the reception and display of what is certain to be placed in our hands within the next few years. The present Museum building is not more than large enough for the ethnological and technological material already available. The proposed new building will afford accommodation for the natural history collections which are at present very inade- quately housed. For instance, the amount of space assigned to the collection of mammals is about 6,500 feet. At least double that amount of space will be needed to accommodate the material now on hand as soon as the taxidermists of the Museum shall have been able to prepare it for exhibition, it being our desire to have mounted groups similar to the buffalo family recently finished, in order to preserve for future generations representations of the large quadrupeds native to this continent, which are on the verge of extinction. in the world, is very inadequately shown and requires double the case room now available. The collection of mollusks, which is one of the most complete in the world and contains more than 450,000 specimens, is at present almost entirely unprovided for. Ee es 8 ee eee Si FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1229 The collection of insects, which though smaller is so far as North America is con- cerned equally perfect, is also practically without any exhibition space. And so I might continue. It should be borne in mind that under the roofs of the Smithsonian and new Museum buildings are grouped together collections which in London, Paris, or any other of the European capitals are provided for in a group of museums for the accom- modation of which a much larger number of equally commodious buildings is found needful. Yours, very respectfully, 8. P. Lana.ey, Secretary. Hon. Justin 8. Morritt, United States Senate. Number of entries’ in the catalogues of the National Museum since 1882. Name of department, 1882. 1883. 1884. 1885.2 1885-86. 1886-87. Arts and industries: Vist MONT TLC OL Cele orale laieinicinlciwieleteisin wal|ecain ate sin(ee.« 4, 000 BAAD |e aaislersiaie 4, 850 5,516 HPI Meee eens atic esdc ee elation simeies 1, 244 15580! ce et ene 822 877 SHE RELeS Masse casos eae ccee ec Sede clo yoewedacclessee tt cee 2000) E2s2h ese 3, 064 3, 154 DULG CHES 3 co ae See e Ene CREE] Keener Eee er Br Q008|S2es een. 9, 870 10, 078 Pere MU LOGUGtSios ceca cen- ccc ma| sarees ese ste geek L000: |352525-c 2,792 2, 822 NEV IPEMCDILCCLULG. 2 7a u roan cts clic coce mace seco sew as GUO HS rina ee sex ok ae, cialis ce ates. 6 TRE Pore yctl te) Gs e Se A eee deel a eed [ol ee ee Nee ee ee eee 1, 002 18, 634 PEEL GRY OSes sar ae ce oie eer estks | aden es 4uss|ex cee cecs|laai ane mes scalaeeaesins 77 100 COME Chitlthel (Ce Bil Gy RY ie aes ee ees ee Se ee | ee |e ee |e HOON Poses se BEIVSL Ca AREAS =e = aoe ie «aid ane cies acirnnis| Seaencwcleleewesiseioce s|ccesewlels 250 251 TUE VH TG LEE ee SI SoS Se Se Ee oe el bee See a | ee eee) ee ee 197 198 PMESEE CoN DTOOUICES =< soe asa | sae acioniion| Skea et enact Naceene se cies locos ee 659 661 MSc rT MUBUMNCL US sete aaecee ace lene, cone lmascseitee albeasdatenoeelaessooe 400 417 BERS EIA ONLEE oreo steno Hoa staal) ee cok ne Ieee ed cmscaaelcameen co PPA Ec eee seg Moar ecdalsspapey; money jete is. ./25- 39303 LT ee eae es Si OG" lisse sass MRIS LI Ree eee Senin Seca sa.alis aoet 2 cee don cecdiow es 200000 Pe een ce. 500, 000 503, 764 Amencanabonpinal pottery ...2---22-|s LE ——— SS ee ee NY FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. *1237 [Extract.] U. S. Commission oF FisH AND FISHERIES, Washington, D. C., January 31, 1889. Sir: ~ * * * * * * In regard to the item for rent of office (page 33, lines 1, 2, and 3 of the bill), the general opinion seems to be that the quarters now occupied by the Commission for offices should be vacated, and that the so-called Armory building, situated on the Government reservation south of the Baltimore and Potomac depot, should be fitted up for its use, and an amendment to the bill was accordingly presented in and adopted by the House. In my opinion, however, that amendment does not fully cover the needs of the Commission, and I would recommend that it be changed so as to read: “For altering, adapting, and extending the Armory building, on the Mall, in the city of Washington, for offices of the United States Fish Commission, including heat- ing apparatus and other equipments, $10,000, or so much thereof as may be neces- sary, the sum to be immediately available and to be expended under the direction of the Architect of the Capitol; and the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution is hereby required to move from the said building all properties under his control. And the Architect of the Capitol is hereby directed to examine and make report to Congress at its next regular session as to the practicability and cost of constructing a basement story under the National Museum building.”’ In regard to the increase of the item, attention is called to the fact that provision is simply made for fitting up the interior of the building, while, in my opinion, the exterior of the building should also receive some attention. Without doubt there should be an entire new roof, the present roof being in exceedingly bad condition, and a number of the upper layers of brick need relaying. Respecting the giving of the building in its entirety to the Commission, I would state that the character of the work performed under the direction of the Smith- sonian Institution is such as to render the prosecution of office duties and the keep- ing of archives a serious one, the work being principally the taxidermic preparation of animals, the making of plaster casts of fishes, relief maps, etc., rendering neces- sary a great deal of noise and creating much dust and other dirt and offensive odors. The attic of the building is stored with a number of large packages of such weight as to have rendered necessary the bracing of the floor by additional girders of great strength. In order that the exact condition of affairs may be seen, an inspection of the building by the committee is respectfully requested. * * * * * * * Very respectfully, Hon. W. B. ALtison, Chairman Senate Committee on Appropriations. February 19, 1889—House. Sundry civil bill for 1890 considered. The next amendment was on page 42, to strike out the clause from line 3 to line 21, inclusive. (See House proceedings of January 25, 1889.) M. McDonatp, Commissioner. For altering and fitting up the interior of the Armory building, on the Mall, city of Washington, now occupied as a hatching station, for the accommodation of the offices of the United States Fish Commission, and for general repairs to said build- ing, including the heating apparatus, and for repairing and extending the outbuild- ings, $7,000, or so much thereof as may be necessary, the same to be immediately available and to be expended under the direction of the Architect of the Capitol; and for the purpose above named the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution is 1238 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. hereby required to move from the second and third stories of this building all prop- erties, except such as are connected with the workshops hereinafter named, under his control; and the workshops now in the second story of said building shall be trans- ferred to and provided for in the third story thereof. And the Architect of the Capitol is hereby directed to examine and make report to Congress at its next regu- lar session as to the practicability and cost of constructing a basement story under the National Museum building. And in lieu thereof to insert: For altering, adapting, and extending the Armory building, on the Mall, in the city of Washington, for offices of the United States Fish Commission, including heating apparatus and other equipment, $10,000, or so much thereof as may be necessary, this sum to be immediately available and to be expended under the direction of the Architect of the Capitol; and the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution is hereby required to move from the said building all properties under his control. And the Architect of the Capitol is hereby directed to examine and make report to Congress at its next regular session as to the practicability and cost of constructing a basement story under the National Museum building. Agreed to. March 2, 1889. Sundry civil act for 1890. Fish Commission: For altering and fitting up the interior of the Armory building, on the Mall, city of Washington, now occupied as a hatching station, for the accommodation of the offices of the United States Fish Commission, and for general repairs to said ‘building, including the heating apparatus, and for repairing and extending the outbuildings, $7,000, or so much thereof as may be necessary, the same to be immediately available and to be expended under the direction of the Architect of the Capitol; and for the purpose above named the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution is hereby required to move from the second and third stories of this building all properties except . such as are connected with the workshops hereinafter named, under his control; and the workshops now in the second story of said build- ing shall be transferred to and provided for, in the third story thereof. And the Architect of the Capitol is hereby directed to examine and make report to Congress at its next regular session as to the practica- bility and cost of constructing a basement story under the National Museum building. (Stat. XXV, 953.) NATIONAL MUSEUM—CLASSIFIED SERVICE. October 8, 1888—Senate. Mr. James F. Wixson, of Lowa, offered a resolution, and asked for its present consideration: Resolved, That the Regents and Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, and Director of the United States National Museum, be, and hereby are, directed to for- mulate and transmit to the Senate, at their earliest convenience, a schedule of classi- fied service of the officers and employees of the National Museum, arranged accord- ing to duty and salary, as the same is required for the proper working of the Museum. aoe FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1239 Mr. G. F. Hoar. From what committee does that come? Mr. Witson, of Iowa. From none. It is a resolution that I intro- duced in order to get the information. Mr. Hoar. I should like to inquire for information—I have no doubt it is all right—have we authority to impose directions on the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution and the Director of the National Museum ? ; Mr. Witson, of Iowa. The resolution relates mainly to the National Museum, which, I suppose, we have a right to call upon for informa- tion. It might be different as to the Smithsonian Institution, but as the resolution relates to the Museum, I presume we have that authority. There is no reason why we should not have it. Mr. Hoar. We have authority to give such directions to the heads of departments, which rests on unbroken usage from the beginning of the Government, but I am not aware that one House of Congress has a right to order an executive officer of the Government to do anything for its convenience, especially that we have such control over the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. It may be there is such authority reserved by statute. I shall not interpose an. objection to the resolution, because I know personally the officers referred to would be anxious to communicate the information, and it is the desire of the Senator from Iowa. The President pro tempore (Mr. Joun J. Ineatts). If there be no objection to the present consideration of the resolution, the question is on agreeing to the same. The resolution was agreed to. March 2, 1889—Senate. Letter of the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution in reference to Senate resolution of October 8, 1888, asking for ‘a schedule of the classified service of the officers and employees of the National Museum.” SmiTHsonIAN Institution, March 2, 1889. Sir: In response to the Senate resolution asking for ‘‘a schedule of the classified service of the officers and employees of the National Museum,”’ I have the honor to transmit the accompanying schedule, which represents the present actual necessities of the service. The service for the fiscal year of 1887-88 was reported upon in a letter to the _ Speaker of the House of Representatives, dated December 1, 1888 (H. R. Mis. Doc. No. 55, Fiftieth Congress, second session). In this the aggregate expenditures for service were shown to have been $122,750.47, of which sum $97,493.32 was paid from the appropriation for preservation of collec- tions, $19,203.79 from that for furniture and fixtures, and $6,053.36 from that for heating, lighting, and electrical and telephonic service. A schedule of the number of persons employed in the various departments of the Museum was also given in this letter (pages 4, 9,11). This schedule should, how- ever, be regarded only as an approximate one, since many of the employees were actually engaged only a part of the year and others were temporarily transferred to the pay rolls of the Cincinnati exhibition, and were engaged in special work in con- nection with that exhibition. 1240 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. It is estimated that the aggregate expenditures for services for the present fiscal year (1888-89) will be $129,710, of which amount $103,000 will be paid from the appropriation for preservation of collections, $20,000 from that for furniture and fixtures, and $5,710 from that for heating, lighting, and electrical and telephone service. i ‘In the schedule herewith transmitted it is shown that for the proper working of the Museum the amount required for services would be as follows: For salaries of scientific assistants Sa Gh pleco ee 2S ee pene -...--- $56, 300. 00 Porrelerical forces 62 Mie Coes Sees RESP E SSE Sere CE eer a Renee 36, 920. 00 For services in preparing, mounting, and installing the collections -.--.. 22, 060. 00 For services in policing, caring for, and cleaning the buildings -....-.--- 36, 740. 00 For services in repairing buildings, cases, and objects in the collections... 14, 163, 50 For salaries and wages in designing, making, and inspecting cases and other appliances for the exhibition and safe-keeping of the collections. 18, 337.50 For services in connection with the heating, lighting, and electrical tele- phonic service 22.20 50-s8set db 2seUs Us Cees reee Eke eee 6, 620. 00 For services of miscellaneous employees, including draftsmen, messen- BOER, (GUC = os cca nan pene ns Shoe deed bee nace = + as ea eee 7, 980. 00 Motel 3 ivy. fe hieoe Gili he Soe eee hee ie Oe Ee 199, 121. 00 The increase in the total expenditure as indicated is due partly to the addition of a number of officers to the scientific staff and also to the necessity for a few addi- tional clerks and a considerable number of watchmen, laborers, cleaners, and mes- sengers, whose services are essential to the safety of the collections as well as to provide for the cleanliness and proper care of the buildings and for the comfort of visitors. The rates of pay indicated are in most cases considerably lower than are customar- ily allowed for similar service in the Executive Departments. In the schedule now presented expenditure for services only is taken into consideration. Tr No attempt has been made to present the needs of the Museum in regard to the purchase or collecting of specimens, the purchase of general supplies, preservatives, materials for mounting and installing collections, books, exhibition cases, furniture, fuel and gas, the maintenance of the heating and lighting appliances, freight and cartage, traveling expenses of collectors and agents, ete. For these various purposes the expenditure in the last fiscal year amounted to $45,249.53, and that for the present fiscal year will, it is estimated, amount to about $48,000, a sum very inadequate to the needs of the service. It does not include the expenditures for printing the labels and blanks, and pro- ceedings and bulletins of the Museum, for which the appropriation for many years past has been $10,000, and for which I have asked $15,000 for the coming fiscal year. I must not omit to call your attention to the fact that owing to the peculiar consti- tution of the Museum as a scientific establishment, it has hitherto been ‘possible to secure a special economy, owing to the fact that its officers and employees are not scheduled as in the Executive Departments. In thus presenting, in obedience to the request of the Senate, a schedule of a dura- ble organization of the service, I wish to remark emphatically that there are pressing needs in other directions—needs that merit the serious consideration of Congress, in order that the National Museum may be enabled to maintain a satisfactory position in comparison with those of European nations. I have the honor to be, your most obedient servant, S. P. Laneey, Secretary. Hon. JoHn J. INGALLS, President pro tempore of the Senate. FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1241 Schedule of the classified service of the officers and employees of the United States National Museum, arranged according to duty and salary, as required for the proper working of the Museum. Designation. pei a Scientific staff. Secretary Smithsonian Institution, director ex officio..........-...-..--.----------------- Bacttieeom wees Assistant secretary Smithsonian Institution, in charge of National Museum.........---- $4, 000. 00 RETA NE CROCUTLV ES ONIGON jatass in oicee isinemSnyaeie aiaiam Sind laicje)8 LUI a Bakte Hoc aa ee eiaclsemter 3, 000. 00 PRE EV ENTE EEE NT SA TAAp eo AOO lo cciae atccree ater Snare cae -ininaw amine ais siae'a Sn seciciocted heeae Sane hee 12, 000. 00 TTP PA LOTS into OU leas cer Wace n ac acca ecee a Simcisatet/qelaainsl= aectem aq, sale isincis te ae aciails he | 10, 500. 00 Four assistant curators, at SGU area woe sas teas saaes ate ene as Sasso seg4 sae teas Jeheep 6, 400. 00 ROH MARSIN GIT CUEATOIS, Gingl AU's cnsiqekcrciste «estas oa cae sseeeis eine calc soteecmn eres scel aa] 5, 600. 00 MIG et aE COO cana c ee ones Ste caer soscac gece ade e tees se eh seueinaiuceccnisns secs eaeneces 4, 800. 00 IPE Abie GOO: ae cicls, « Siena osecloe.c.c5 asc casesesesinceseas Lic REE ope Ree wane SOBs peso see eee 6, 000. 00 Rrnuip sence pyiCOl Ura C has saaes anos ams noone eee eanase nc srems seaamaas sansa sae 4,000. 00 56, 300. 00 Clerical staff. iE ener eae sete SEAR EELS Sahin onica ph ape ciissmockis soca ease seme = 2, 200. 00 Four chiefs of divisions: Correspondence; transportation, storage, and record; publica- Hansanelabels: metalation, ab $2000 oo. c ke oie sean dsec ces ctenwcet= = nceeens adam's 8, 000. 00 PINCHED ETRIN Es CLOTHS ON: aera ia ote sina eseee ccc ccisiaie acs ecw le en fa el a my ie eo 1, 200. 00 inp Gens (itd BRC sabes ooccbs sence oe pene See Heb p BSE nonn HSS SS— Sas eno anes shennan aevsesecr 1, 800. 00 OR CEERONCISSA Sasa eames cals jac nee ne ad css aiainrn Sean alas Sate mew ae once hes aes Sele 3, 200. 00 TTS CAML ATO at CORE Ae aS Da ns ee Ce i ee es Re re ee eo ee ee 4, 200. 00 Pogiviy CSTELRE Gi (C)IEG hae ent EE ee ee ee eS Ae ae eee Se 4, 800. 00 ; ISAT CyB) MASTS GILDA UR Bors cen dasbonco se COoH tio one Her Gbrs SE EpSEGn sero Nero Seeman aa Ee= 3, 600. 00 REE COD VINO Wat p70 ates alse ene eae Niele ie ote See nie tals wichinle wo omeeacisa= Seceeniencas 2, 880. 00 “SEE GUT MRL PAD cepa an 6 Ses eeebe Das SOe Oooo ReC ROR EeBeE AS eae DESC oSSenroeece esse aor ne se 3, 600. 00 SPRTEEICODVISiS Hl CACO a ats cae sonnet tae a oa nica no a eae aos se emieine anne =e emma 1, 440. 00 36, 920. 00 Preparators. JU CED TEN Be se sobs bosene sec Gece b ness eee Sao Se Se SRE BR Specr SeSe tens cen Senae ne mohoee reas 2, 000. 00 | NETUS STD AG (ahi OLE Soe Speco Ne GES O SP EE aCnt Bes SechR AEE Doo SaR Per DARE E eo ACeeE SAEnre ae 1, 000. 00 2 OUI) hoon oo SuSE tbs OOS SES HBSS Se aos Seo Seas Se SES SSE Be ice ner -OnboNee Ten eCneOSarness oc rener 1, 320, 00 ENGH Tite 0 aT ae SS A SORE ie et Bc ee SESS E SCE MME Heer ate eos oe. nt en aaa ty 2,000, 00 ye a: (era TG FETS Tn ES ee SS SOS ae ae PEE Ae ey ne gee EE aE et Dee ee eee 1, 500. 00 MOU ENINISEN AUpl’ OOO 2.1 setae ow te stole cee eee ascents is © siaiamalela ot aleniate hae aie iste 2,000. 00 WO IOeLIMISLS, Ab SI 20s 20-2 ees ae cede as Soe ceeciceceeseeses ry S0 es) Ia SS NII SS eR 1, 440. 00 ROMCIIU IRN asec ar eae ne anima tases meee eee dees tate taal see Soe donde eae 2, 000. 00 SITET REICH GUC ener aa. tae ae arte sean | cco n cataracts ene A pttnmme at eae ee aoaiene Soe anwtecmlalmeicae 1, 200. 00 vive erie Dilys eyeing Oe ea ae ee ee eee Se POE AS JS SCRE ee eaase nS CRE ee 1, 200. 00 (Cee eared (renee a ee eee = OCP mer GEE DOANE Se SOGGeS> 149s 3o 2s Kau ape ser sae eae pe a5 shee 900. 00 Special service by contract........--.....--- Be) es oye Be ae ee 5, 500. 00 22, 060. 00 Buildings and labor. One superintendent of buildings ....... wane eece en nee coc peceer nnn nenansseetnneecancesccnees 1, 620. 00 SIMO ASAISLan LSU peLINtenGents, ah O10 @.< ac nie enic 2 5\n\sinicjnnic in scemisinc sls wemieccce sees a aaslnnces 2,000. 00 Four watchmen, at $780....-....--.. See ee ee ae aa eee ee ee eee oes a oa ee SS 3, 120.00 Twenty-four watchmen and doorkeepers, at $600.......--.. 2-2-2202 2c e cece eee e ene ene eneee 14, 400. 00 RCo EC esis HOPCENS OLNEE SO serio tects oi src laine ce alee paisa = none emi pe eteteiietaim gra ale eo siete oie cote 5, 760. 00 PRNTeO ELON O DIMEN AIUIMASO se se ncaa eS neice 6 aot cto vuln. cups eae see seine sie wntlclsice cise lsiapieleitne von 1, 440. 00 IREMALLCROAMLS BTCC PHMCIS Cat O00 ls .c2cnene ns Soec ono as seas pede ssebeusscenceneeer casos 38, 600. 00 Special service of laborers and cleaners, to be paid by the hour ..............---.-------- 4, 800. 00 36, 740. 00 aThis officer receives pay also from the Smithsonian Institution for similar services. 1242 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Schedule of the classified service of the officers and employees of the United States National Museum, etc.—Continued. Designation. one Mechanics (repairing buildings, cases, and objects in the collections) . Cabinetmaker; at:$3:50 per:day 2.25.52 25e3 25 eee Se ee ee ee ee a ae ee $1,095. 50 Two painters; at $2.50 per day sa... errs ts Se ne ee URE Be Ee ae abt OL LU eared 1, 565. 00 One tinner; at $2 per day 2.225924 L6 estan te ggee se tees Git ocd cmeet- = See oe 626. 00 One Stonecutter and mason; at:$2 per day acccceke. on cee ene eeeeeeRee ee soe Laas Ooo eee eee 626. 00 Six skilled laborers, at $2.50 per day- <2. <2. <-2 <2 beeen seen eee sieocecnme ee cease 4, 695. 00 Six skilled Jaborers, at $2) per Gay cc s:¢ cose se a ae ae ee loin ar a emt apoio teers ae 3, 756. 00 Special service by contract o.0.508e Sec oen een eee aene eee eeeeEwouce tue kweas teeee ete ~ 1,800.00 14, 163. 50 Enpraecer Ol Property - oc «ee en eae ee gece eee ae ee Eee ROP eee OR ee ee See eRe eee eae 2,000. 00 ONE COPYING. oo. = on - eater ee ectele ee eninnt lea see he ek hese Reece eee Eee ee een an etetee as ener 900. 00 (CIELO OA Bite Bee) SOR EE RO Re IC BOOS CON OS SOSH SOT GCAES Ss AAS GaSInTndc See Sconcateoseeasocice 720. 00 OTC CODY IS bn aoe ae arene a ea ee nee ees eee el teen ee ee 600. 00 ONEICOPYISbi sont cases teeswacce ae awe cee enspe cea cke ts ser see sen eee ete sok ote easae 480. 00 Six carpenters and cabinetmakers; ato dn. = 2-- -qms oa eam eic nee us demi ae eee ees 5, 634. 00 Three painters, Ab $2.5 2-25-55 oe oc snc sae ooe nine oe acer ene aetna eee or eee eee eee 1, 978.00 Two skilled laborers, at $2.50....-.- Cowes nee Cea see ioe temo Seinen ieee es eae ee eee 1, 565. 00 Tro skied IAbOLers, Alls s oscc- Hane ceases sce men tester ecimemceebeebone o see eneMmacer ance 1, 252. 00 Ti theseyilhsy ey eres tye oe Be Re a ee me Se pot oe ae ee oe Sa ee ASE Re ereeisss 1, 408. 50 RDECISL SENVICl OY CONMUAC Es aoa inm cee aietetel= eseleieae atete ee rele eee ee eee er are err 1, 800. 00 "18,337. 50 Heating, lighting, and electrical service. a Toiebegh ils i enn nae aoa Hage eee ees ach eri the SSS soca eto sSs obese Ssoee de acsos 1, 400. 00 One/assistant engineer; « < .5 i5ss5 Mar.31.| Mar. 31. Preservation of collections: DHIAPICKor toe tatccneeeeesisccs a FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1263 of the fixed instruments at the U. 8. Naval Observatory, and of work performed with them. (3) Meteorological instruments of all kinds. (4) Surveying instruments of all kinds. (5) Logs, registering logs, log lines, reels, time glasses. (6) Sounding implements, hand and deep sea leads, registering leads, deep-sea sounding machines and appurtenances. (7) Signaling apparatus of various kinds for day and night signaling. (8) Electric-light apparatus. (9) Nautical charts and books. (10) Ship’s library. (11) Flags of all kinds. (12) Relics and models. The Chief Signal Officer of the Army states that he could readily furnish a large number of articles which illustrate the very interesting work to which that branch of the service is devoted. The Chief of the Bureau of Steam Engineering of the Navy says: If the museum is to be made use of as an aid to technical education, as well as a place of public interest, I would suggest that a collection of models, both working and sectional, representing the evolution of naval machinery, would be of great value. The cost of making a series of such models representative of the various stages in the growth of the marine engine would be considerable, but would be of great value, as there is nothing of the kind extant in this country. In the future the collection could be kept up at a moderate expense, models of engines representing various types being made from time to time as improvements may be introduced. Commodore Walker, in his letter from which we have already quoted, remarks: The real interest in a military and naval museum centers in the exhibition of means for offensive and defensive warfare. To such features of the proposed museum the ordnance departments of the Army and Navy would be the principal contributors, and the replies which have been sent in by the chiefs of those departments show that it would be an easy matter to arrange an exhibition of great value, illustrating the progress which has been made in the methods of war- fare and the important work which the Government is now carrying on for the purpose of providing itself with sufficient means of conducting a successful offensive and defensive contest with any foreign nation, should such a contest ever be forced upon us. When it is considered what a vast quantity of material the Govern- ment possesses which could be embodied in an exhibition of artillery, ancient and modern, it seems strange that no steps have been taken hitherto to bring together an artillery collection in the city of Wash- ington. It is safe to say that in none of the collections now accessible to the public here is there anything which would equal in interest the exhibit of field guns and heavy cannons which might be made by sim- ply bringing together specimens of the weapons, old and new, of which the Government possesses such an extensive supply. 1264 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. National pride of itself, if no other consideration existed, should prompt us to authorize the establishment of a museum in which the guns captured in foreign wars since the earliest times in which Ameri- can forces were engaged in battle can be assembled. But there is an additional incentive to such action in the fact that for many years the United States was far in advance of the other governments of the world in the production of artillery and ordnance, and no less interest- ing and desirable would it be to show that once again we are well to the front in those important matters. It is probable that such an exhibition of field and heavy guns as could now be made by our War and Navy Departments would be second to no other collection of this character now existing in any country in Europe. One of the most important objects to be accomplished by. the estab- lishment of a national military and naval museum will be the early preparation of a series of relief plans of the great spectacular battles of the late civil war. These plans will appropriately supplement and illustrate the official documentary history of the war now publishing under the auspices of the War Department. With the aid of the prominent officers of the armies of the Union and of the late Southern Confederacy who still survive, it will be possible to construct at a mod- erate cost models in plaster of Gettysburg, Nashville, Chickamauga, Chattanooga, and other fields of great battles, and to indicate by means of miniature figures representing the troops engaged the general char- acter of the movements of the contending forces. Such plans of bat- tlefields have been brought to a high degree of perfection in the National Museum of Germany and other European countries. The visitor to the Royal Ordnance Museum in Berlin finds there large relief plans of the character indicated, representing nearly. all the great national battlefields on which Prussian armies have contended for the mastery. It is not necessary to point out the great interest which would attach to such battle plans when placed on exhibition in the city of Washing- ton. If they were constructed with proper care and due attention to historical accuracy, it would be possible for any visitor to the museum in a few hours to gain from them a clearer idea of how the great battles of the war of the rebellion were actually fought than could be obtained from days of study of the literature of the war. To the veteran soldiers of all sections of the country such battle plans would prove intensely interesting, enabling them to recali the stirring events in which they participated, and to refresh their memories concerning the history of the great struggle in which they were engaged. As the years pass, the veteran officers and soldiers who were antagonists in’ the battles of the civil war manifest an increasing disposition to meet and fraternize upon the fields where they fought a quarter of a century ago. ‘The recent reunion of Northern and Southern veterans on the field of Gettysburg = Sy FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1265 and the coming reunion of Union and ex-Confederate officers on the field of Chickamauga may be cited as noteworthy instances of the development of this sentiment. Constant efforts are making to determine and to indicate by appro- priate monuments the relative positions of the different troops on these battlefields, and it is safe to assert that the provision by the Govern- ment of facilities for the exhibition in the proposed museum of accurate relief plans of the great battles of the civil war will be universally _ regarded as not only a wise act, but as an important and necessary step for the preservation of the facts of our military. history, which must possess ever-increasing interest as the years roll on. It is a well-known fact that during the present century no nation in the world has contributed more to the remarkable development in fire- arms that has taken place than the United States. In European capi- tals great pains are taken to preserve and publicly exhibit collections of small arms showing the progress of invention in this field of effort. It is a singular fact that at the present time no similar collections exist at the capital city of the United States. The statements furnished by the Secretary of War and Secretary of the Navy show that the Goy- ernment is already in possession of specimens of the firearms in use in ancient and modern times which would furnish the nucleus of a most valuable and extensive collection if brought together in a museum building here. The establishment of a military and naval museum may subserve the important purpose of the formation of special exhibits of mate- rials and specimens belonging to the Army and Navy for temporary use in such industrial and historical expositions as may be organized in the large cities of the country fromtime to time. When suchexpo- sitions are organized, the Army and Navy of the United States are always called upon to furnish collections, which are regarded with great interest by the citizens of the country. Hitherto when thus called upon the Secretaries of War and Navy have been required to detail officers to prepare the necessary collections, and when the expo- sitions have been closed it has been necessary to allow the collections to be disposed of without regard to their possible future utilization on similar occasions. With a properly organized and equipped national museum there will be at all times stores and materials which can be loaned for the occa- sion and returned to the national museum when the several exhibitions shall have terminated. The Congress has at different times appropri- ated considerable sums of money for the preparation of these exhibits which should have continued to exist, but for which there has been no proper storehouse. The large and highly interesting contributions of the National Government to the Centennial Exposition at Philadel- phia, to the New Orleans Exposition, and to the recent exposition at H. Doc. 732 80 1266 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Cincinnati, may be instanced in this connection. It frequently hap- pens that the Army and Navy are called upon to fit out expeditions — for special purposes which require much care in preparation and are worthy of illustration ina national museum. It would have been a public benefit if the various special devices which the Navy Depart-— ment was compelled to provide for the expedition for the relief of the Greely Arctic party could have been placed in some national repository. - When the expedition under the command of Commodore Schley returned from. the successful execution of the work intrusted to it the novel and useful appliances and supplies which were then accumu- lated were scattered among the different bureaus of the Department, there being no other way of disposing of them, and many things which could and should have been preserved as models of what were then produced for use in any possible contingency of the same sort in the future were lost sight of. : The statements furnished from the War and Navy Departments in response to the resolution mentioned show that the Government is possessed of a very large number of war trophies, none of which seem to have been: kept at Washington. The largest single collection is that of the flags captured during the Mexican and earlier wars, which is at the Naval Academy. If these trophies are to be exhibited they should be made accessible to the largest possible number of visitors, and this can only be done by placing them in the proposed military and naval museum. The same may be said of the guns and swords captured in foreign wars which are now at Annapolis. There are a considerable number of Revolutionary trophies at the Military Academy at West Point, including the great chain stretched across the Hudson River, which should be transferred wholly or in part tothe National Museum. Neither the Naval nor Military Academy should be deprived of all the interesting trophies deposited with them, but a sufficiently interesting portion will be left with them if most of their collections of that kind are transferred {6 the proposed national museum. ‘The reports show valuable historical relics at Frankfort Arsenal, Allegheny Arsenal, the National Armory, Governors’ Island, Rock Island Arsenal, Madison Barracks, Fort Pickens, Norfolk Navy- Yard, the Naval Home at Philadelphia, Mare Island Navy-Yard, and other points, which could be much better cared for ina central national museum than if allowed to remain scattered at the different posts and stations in the Army and Navy. From the information furnished in the reply of the Secretary of War to the resolution of inquiry concerning the material available for the proposed museum, it appears that there will be no difficulty in supplying at once a complete collection of army uniforms, beginning with those used by the ‘‘ Continentals” and including all the changes a a ee eee FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1267 ‘made in uniforms down to the present time. The Quartermaster- General of the Army, Gen. S. B. Holabird, states that the existing collection at the Philadelphia general depot is being duplicated. These uniforms, when suitably mounted, will form an exceedingly interest- ing department of the proposed museum, and the existence of such a collection will have much historical value in the future as well as immediate popular interest. The same may be said of the uniforms of the Navy. The statements sent to Congress by the Secretaries of War and the Navy, in reply to the resolution of the House of Representatives, show that it will be an easy matter to organize a historical collection of American inventions in small arms which will be of great interest and value. At present we have no such collection which is accessible to the public. The arms which the Government now possess are scattered among the arsenals and navy-yards of the country. . It is well known that the citizens of this country have shown great inge- nuity in the development of firearms, and have contributed many of the most important inventions in this field which have been made dur- ing the past century. All the other great governments of the world have instituted collections of small arms to illustrate what their citi- zens have accomplished in this department of effort. The United States should not be behind other nations in providing a place where such a collection can be assembled and kept accessible to inventors and to all who are interested in the subject. The very large collec- tion at the National Armory, at Springfield, Mass., fai furnish an admirable nucleus for the department of small arms which it is proposed to place in the national military and naval museum. After careful consideration, the committee unanimously recommend the enactment of the accompanying bill, introduced by Mr. Townshend, of Illinois, and referred to the committee. Committed to Committee of the Whole. DETAILED STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES REQUIRED. October 2, 1888. Sundry civil act for 1889. The Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution shall submit to Con- gress at its next session a detailed statement of the expenditures of the fiscal year 1888, under appropriations for ‘‘ International Exchanges,” ‘** North American Ethnology,” and the ‘‘ National Museum,” and annually thereafter a detailed statement of expenditures under said appropriations shall be submitted to Congress at the beginning of each regular session thereof. (Stat., XXV, 529.) 1268 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. December 18, 1888—House. Letter presented from the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution (S. P. Langley) concerning expenditures for International Exchanges, the National Museum, and North American Ethnology for the fiscal year 1888. December 19, 1888—House. Above letter referred to Committee on Appropriations. GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS RESTRICTED TO PUBLIC BUSINESS. October 2, 1888. Sundry civil act for 1889. The heads of the Executive Departments, before transmitting their annual reports to Congress, the printing of which is chargeable to — this appropriation, shall cause the same to be carefully examined, and shall exclude therefrom all matter, including engravings, maps, draw- ings, and illustrations, except such as they shall certify in their letters transmitting such reports to be necessary and to relate entirely to the transaction of public business. (Stat., XXV, 547.) GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BUILDING. December 10, 1888—Senate. Mr. O. H. Puart introduced a bill (S. 3684): That a fireproof building for the accommodation of the Geological Survey shall be erected on the Government reservation between the National Museum and the Army Medical Museum, in the city of Washington; said building shall be constructed on the plan submitted by the Director of the Geological Survey, with such modifica- tions as shall be found necessary or advantageous without materially increasing the cost thereof, and the construction of said building shall be in charge of a commission composed of the First Assistant Secretary of the Interior, the Architect of the Capi- tol, and the Director of the Geological Survey, who shall be authorized to make contracts for the construction thereof, after proper advertisements have been made, and to employ the necessary persons; the money appropriated for said building shall be disbursed by the chief disbursing clerk of the Geological Survey, and the sum of $600,000 is hereby appropriated, out of any moneys in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the construction of said building, and the cost of said building shall not exceed said amount; and it shall be the duty of the said commission carefully to scrutinize the plan which may be deemed preferable, and to adopt it only on condi- tion that the entire cost of the completion of the said building shall fall within the amount above specified in this act. Referred to Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds. December 10, 1888—House. Mr. W. H. Sowpen introduced a bill (H. 11689): That a fireproof building for the use and accommodation of the United States Geological Survey shall be erected on the Government reservation between the National Museum and the Army Medical Museum, in the city of Washington, D. C.; and the said building shall be constructed on the plan submitted by the Director of FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1269 the Geological Survey, with such modifications as shall be found necessary or advan- tageous without materially increasing the cost thereof, and the construction of said building shall be in charge of a commission composed of the Supervising Architect of the Treasury, the Architect of the Capitol, and the Director of the Geological Sur- vey, who shall be authorized to make contracts for the construction thereof, after proper advertisements have been made, and to employ the necessary persons; and the money appropriated for said building shall be disbursed by the chief disbursing clerk of the Geological Survey. Src. 2. The sum. of $500,000 is hereby appropriated, out of any moneys in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the construction of said building, and the cost of said building shall not exceed said amount. Sec. 3. It shall be the duty of the said commission carefully to scrutinize the plan which may be deemed preferable, and to adopt it only on condition that the entire cost of the erection and completion of said building shall not exceed the amount specified in this act. _ Referred to Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds. February 16, 1889 —House. My. Samuret Drssie, from Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds, submitted report (H. 4089) to accompany bill (H. 11689): The Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds, to which was referred the bill (H. 11689) for the erection of a public building for the use and accommodation of the United States Geological Survey’ upon the Government reservation in the city of Washington, D. C., has had the same under consideration and respectfully reports as follows: The United States Geological Survey is at present in rented quarters, occupied at an annual rental of $10,000, besides occupying temporarily twenty-two rooms in the National Museum; and these rooms are now needed for the purposes of the Museum itself. The nature and impor- tance of the work with which the Geological Survey is now intrusted, and which is of incalculable value to the Government, requires for its expeditious and convenient prosecution twice the space now available for the purpose; and the location of the building near to the National Museum will enable the officers of the Survey to use the Museum as a depository of their collections, as now provided by law, and at the same time have easy access to them for reference and comparison in prosecuting their scientific researches. By the outlay of $300,000, recommended by the committee, a build- ing can be erected specially adapted to the scientific work of the Survey, and one needs only to visit the rooms now occupied by the Survey to be satisfied that, in their overcrowded condition, work must necessarily be hindered and obstructed for want of sufficient space. The committee therefore recommends the passage of the bill, amended in the limit of cost by reducing the sect: proposed from $500, 000 down to $300,000, as follows: In the first line of section 2 strike out the word “five” and insert the word ‘‘ three” in lieu thereof. e 1270 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. A communication on the subject from the Director of the Geological Survey is appended as a part of this report. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Unitep Statres GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, Washington, D. C., February 15, 1889. ‘ Sir: I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 17th of January, 1889, relating to the necessity for a building for the accommodation of the Geological Survey, and in reply thereto the following statement is made: The building now occupied by the Survey is rented by the Government at the rate of $10,000 per annum. It has eighty-four large and commodious rooms, but they are all so crowded with cases, desks, apparatus, and with the personnel of the Survey that it is with difficulty that the business of the Survey is transacted, and this crowded condition entails serious loss, many times greater in amount, expressed in dollars and cents, than would be sufficient to rent a building twice as large. There are about four hundred persons in the Survey during the winter months, and desks for the accommodation of such a number of persons fill the rooms and halls. In addition to the rooms in the rented building, through the courtesy of the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, the Survey is permitted to use twenty-two roomsin | the National Museum, and these are all crowded in such manner that work is seri- ously obstructed. The rooms in the National Museum were temporarily given to the Survey ata time when there was no pressing necessity for their use by the officers of the Museum; but at the present time the entire Museum is so crowded that the Secretary of the Smithsonian and the Director of the Museum are anxious to have these rooms. surrendered for their use. It will thus be seen that there is pressing necessity for more than twice the amount of room space that is now available for the Survey. I beg permission to set forth somewhat in detail what these necessities are: . (1) It is necessary to have a chemical laboratory with no fewer than twelve large rooms, that the chemical analyses and investigations may be carried on withaccuracy and economy. (2) It is necessary to have a mineralogic laboratory, where minerals, ores, rocks, and soils can be studied, and for this purpose four spacious rooms are needed. (3) It is necessary to have a paleontologic laboratory of sixteen spacious rooms for the accommodation of a large corps of pe oat with apparatus and appliance necessary for their work. (4) It is necessary to have a large room or hall for the library, together with two smaller rooms for the librarian and clerks having charge of the library. (5) It is necessary to have a number of storage rooms for documents, rocks, min- erals, ores, and fossils. (6) It is necessary to have seven rooms for the disbursing officers and their clerks and for the files, records, and documents belonging to that branch of the work. (7) Three rooms are necessary to manage properly the work of the editorial division of the Survey. (8) Six rooms are necessary for the accommodation of the director, chief clerk, stenographers, and the letter and record clerks. _ (9) In addition to the above, 200 rooms are necessary for the proper accommoda- tion of the geologists, geographers, topographers, hydrographers, and engineers. In the Geological Survey it is very important that the scientific assistants should not be unreasonably crowded into rooms with a number of persons in each. * To use large rooms with many persons in them is greatly disadvantageous. The work of the scientific force is multifarious and diverse, and men engaged in research must be to a greater or less extent isolated, that they may quietly work out their results with- EE. a FIFTIETH CONGRESS, 1887-1889. 1271 out disturbance from others. Complex mathematical computations can not be suc- cessfully carried on by aman occupying a room in common with others; he needs to be alone. And the same conditions prevail in all lines of research. What is needed, therefore, for the accommodation of the scientific workers of the Survey is a great number of small rooms, where every man engaged in abstruse study may be alone. . I have ‘planned a building which I believe is well adapted to the needs of the Survey, and if this building is constructed in a simple manner, but substantially and fireproof, it will cost $640,000 as estimated by me, and in making this estimate I have had the advice of architects and builders and have studied carefully the various items of cost. If an appropriation of $300,000 is made, about one-half of this building can be erected and immediately utilized before the other half is finished. It would practi- cally be a complete building in itself, but would not meet the full needs of the Survey. Nevertheless, it may be wise to erect the building in part and to make the first appropriation $300,000. The building planned does not provide for museum space. The statutes now pro- vide that the collections of the Geological Survey, when no longer needed for investigations in progress, shall be deposited in the National Museum. The plan contemplated in the bill before your committee provides that the building for the Geological Survey shall be near to the National Museum, between that building and the Army Medical Museum building. -Such an arrangement of buildings will be highly advantageous to the Survey, as the offices of the Survey would be adjacent to the National Museum, and the materials stored in the Museum building would be accessible for reference and comparison, as constantly needed. ~ s I am, with respect, your obedient servant, J. W. PowEtu, Director Hon. SamvurL DIBBLeE, Chairman Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds, House of Representatives. . Committed to Committee of the Whole. ASTROPHYSICAL OBSERVATORY. December 18, 1888. December 18, 1888. Dear Sir: You were good enough to say last evening that you were prepared to write officially to authorize the Smithsonian Institution to occupy the site in Arling- ton Cemetery for an astrophysical laboratory, devoted to investigations especially requiring seclusion and quiet. I did not, I fear, then express the gratification with which I learned that no obstacle existed, or thank you as earnestly as I now desire to do for your disposition to further the Institution’s wishes. J have the honor to request that you will authorize me to oceupy the ground indi- cated in the accompanying plat and memorandum for the purpose in question. With much respect, I am your obedient servant, 8. P. Lane.ey, Secretary. Hon. W. C. Enpicort, Secretary of War. (Memorandum and blue print inclosed. ) War DEPARTMENT, ‘Washington City, January 9, 1889. Str: I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 18th ultimo, requesting that the Smithsonian Institution be authorized to occupy a site in the Arlington National Cemetery, as indicated in a memorandum and plat inclosed by you, for the purposes of an astrophysical laboratory. 1972 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. In reply I beg to advise you that there is no objection to the occupation, in the manner stated, of a piece of ground not exceeding 2 acres indicated on a plat! which may be examined in the office of the Quartermaster-General, provided that the ground in question be vacated whenever it is required by this Department. Very respectfully. : Wm. C. Enpicort, Secretary of War. Prof. §. P. LANGLEY, Secretary Smithsonian Institution. FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. APPOINTMENT OF REGENTS By the Vice-President. March 28, 1889—Senate. The Vicr-PrestpEnt (Mr, Levi P. Morton). Under the provisions of section 5581 of the Revised Statutes the chair appoints as Regents of the Smithsonian Institution Shelby M. Cullom, of Illinois, and Randall L. Gibson, of Louisiana, to fill vacancies which occurred on the 3d instant. ° APPOINTMENT OF REGENTS By the Speaker. January 6, 1890—House. The Speaker (Mr. T. B. Reep) announced the appointment of the following Regents of the Smithsonian Institution: Benjamin Butterworth, of Ohio, Henry Cabot Lodge, of Massachu- setts, and Joseph Wheeler, of Alabama. APPOINTMENT OF REGENTS By Joint Resolution. April 23, 1890—Senate. Mr. 8. M. Cuntom. I introduce a resolution and ask that it be now considered. It is a matter about which there will be no controversy. The PrEsIDENT pro tempore. The resolution will be read. The Chief Clerk read as follows: Resalved by the Senate, ete.— The PRESIDENT pro tempore. This is in form a joint resolution, and will require three separate readings, like a bill. Mr. Cuttom. The statute requires that it shall be a joint resolution. 1«“The plat in question shows the location of the lot near the center and highest part of the unoccupied wooded ridge, near the colored soldiers’ portion of the ceme- tery. The site, however, is so distant that I should not propose to occupy it while any better could be procured.’’ (Secretary’s Report, 1889, p. 33.) FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 19738 The PresipENT pro tempore. Does the Senator desire to introduce it as such 4 Mr. Cuttom. Yes, sir; and I should like to have it acted on at this time. m The PresipenT pro tempore. It will be read the first time at length, if there be no objection. The joint resolution (S. 77) was read: Resolved, etc., That the vacancies in the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Insti- tution, of the class other than members of Congress, shall be filled by the appoint- ment of Charles Devens, of Massachusetts, in place of Noah Porter, of Connecticut, resigned; and by the reappointment of James C. Welling, of Washington City, whose term of service has expired. The joint resolution was read the second time, and considered as in Committee of the Whole. Mr. I. G. Harris. Lask the Senator from Illinois how these Regents have heretofore been appointed—by joint resolution of Congress? Mr. Cuttom. Yes, sir; I have the statute here. Mr. Harris. I do not care to look to it if the Senator has looked to it. Mr. Cutiom. I have the statute, and I am following it exactly. Mr. F. M. Cockreti. What is the joint resolution / Mr. Cuttom. A joint resolution providing for the appointment of a Regent in place of Dr. Porter, who resigned, and for the reappoint- ment of Dr. James C. Welling, who is now connected with the Smith- sonian, whose term has expired, a matter about which the Regents have all agreed, the committees of both Houses, and the Secretary of the Institution as well. Passed. April 24, 1890— House. Mr. H. C. Lopes. I ask unanimous consent for the immediate con- sideration of a joint resolution to fill vacancies in the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. Immediate action is necessary. The joint resolution (H. 153) was read. (Same as 8. 77.) Passed. April 26, 1890— House. Joint resolution (S. 77) referred to Committee on the Library. May 17, 1890—Senate. Mr. S. M. Cuttom. I wish to interrupt the progress of the Calendar long enough to call up a House joint resolution which has been lying on the table for some time. The Senate had previously passed a joint resolution similar to the one which has been passed by the House. I desire now to have the House joint resolution taken up and acted upon. It is in reference to the appointment of Regents of the Smithsonian . Institution. 1274 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. By unanimous consent, the Senate, as in Committee of the Whole, proceeded to consider the joint resolution (H. R. 153). Passed. May 22, 1890. Joint resolution. Resolved, etc., That the vacancies in the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, of the class other than members of Congress, - shall be filled by the appointment of Charles Devens,’ of Massachu- setts, in the place of Noah Porter, of Connecticut, resigned; and by the reappointment of James C. Welling, of Washington City, whose term of office has expired. (Stat., XX VI, 673.) January 29, 1891—Senate. Mr. Justin S. Morriwy introduced joint resolution (S. 153). That the vacancy in the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, of the class other than members of Congress, shall be filled by the appointment of William Preston Johnston, of Louisiana, in the place of Noah Porter, of Connecticut, resigned. January 29, 1891—House. , Mr. JosepH WHEELER, of Alabama, introduced joint resolution (H. R. 276). (Same as S. 153.) Referred to Committee on the Library. January 31, 1891—Senate. S. 153 passed. February 2, 1891—House. S. 153 referred to Committee on the Library. February 18, 1891—House. Mr. Cuarutes O’NerLx, of Pennsylvania, from the Committee on the Library, submitted report (H. 3863) on §. 153. The Committee on the Library, to whom was referred Senate Joint Resolution No. 153, to fill vacancy in the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, of the class other than members of Congress, by the appointment of William Preston Johnston, of Louisiana, in the place of Noah Porter, of Connecticut, resigned, do hereby report the same favorably and recommend its passage by the House. Referred to House Calendar. (Not acted on until the Fifty-second Congress.) FIREPROOFING SMITHSONIAN BUILDING. December 2, 1889—House. : Estimates for 1891. For the purpose of making fire-proof the roof of the gothic hall.at the west end of the Smithsonian building and for other portions of 1Mr. Devens declined the appointment September 20, 1890. (See Smithsonian Report for 1891.) FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1275 the roof of the said building, to be expended under the direction of the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, $17,500. Norr.—This appropriation passed the Senate at the last session, May 21, 1888, but was not acted on by the House. January 15, 1890—Senate. Mr. J. S. Morritx introduced bill (S. 2033): That, for the purpose of fireproofing the roof of the main hall, and that of the so-called chapel in the west wing of the Smithsonian building, and to put in a sky- light and a well-hole to admit light intg the central portion of the lower hall of said building, and also to replace some woodwork of the towers, and other repairs, under the direction of the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, the sum of $45,000 shall be, and hereby is, appropriated out of any moneys in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated. Referred to Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds. January 27, 1890—Senate. Mr. J. S. Morrity reported bill (S. 2033) with amendments: That, for the purpose of fireproofing the roof of the main hall, and that of the so-called chapel in the west wing of the Smithsonian building, and to put in a sky-light and a well-hole to admit light into the central portion of the lower hall of said build- ing, and also to replace some woodwork of the towers, and other repairs, said work to be done under the direction of the Architect of the Capitol, with the approval of the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, the sum of $45,000 shall be, and hereby is, appropriated out of any moneys in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated. February 10, 1890—Senate. Mr. J. S. Morritu. [ask for the consideration of a couple of bills concerning the Smithsonian Institution. By unanimous consent, the Senate, as in Committee of the Whole, proceeded to consider the bill (S. 2033). The bill was reported from Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds with amendments.’ The amendments were agreed to, and the bill was passed. March 3, 1890—House. Mr. Samuet Diesie, from. Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds, submitted ae on (H. 592) on bill (S. 2083), recommending its passage. Committed to aseeiaes of the Whole. March 6, 1890. March 6, 1890. Sir: I beg to submit herewith some renesties relative. to Senate bill No. 2033, pro- viding for ‘‘ fireproofing the roof of the Smithsonian building,’’ reported favorably by the House Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds March 3, 1890. James Sinithson, in 1829, left the Government $541,000, and out of this small sum the relatively large one $318,000 was spent in erecting the well-known Smithsonian building, which was made partially, but not completely, fireproof, and for whose complete fireproofing and repair this appropriation of $45,000 is asked. This build- ing, with the exception of a small portion of the eastern end, is, and has been for — qe _—- wm — 1See January 27, 1890—Senate. 1276 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. the past fifteen years, employed by the Government rent free, though it has been devoted to purely national purposes, principally for the Government collections (which there is not room for in the Museum building), but also for a suite of rooms devoted chiefly to the transportation of the Congressional Record and like strictly Government documents, under the act of March 2, 1867. In making these preliminary remarks it is not meant that the Government has at any time dealt in any illiberal spirit with the Institution, but these obseryations seem to be pertinent to the subject of the bill, which appropriates a sum wholly to the safety and repair of a building in which even the general repairs have been, to a considerabie extent, paid for hitherto from the limited fund of James Smithson, while it is devoted, with a slight exception, to the uses of the General Government. The portion of the building used for collections includes three large halls and some smaller ones, aggregating about 33,000 square feet of purely exhibition space, with the addition of a large number of office and work rooms. On the 27th of September, 1877, a commission was appointed by the President of the United States to examine the public buildings and report what additional means should be provided to secure them from destruction or injury by fire, consisting of Colonel Casey, Commissioner of Public Buildings; Mr. Clark, Architect of the Capi- tol; and Mr. Hill, Architect of the Treasury. This commission visited and inspected the Smithsonian building and made the following report in regard to it, which was submitted to Congress December 10, 1877 (House Ex. Doc. No. 10, Forty-fifth Congress, second session): ‘‘Smithsonian Institution: All the combustible materials used in the exhatvantieel of the Museum portion of the building should be removed and the parts renewed of fireproof construction.”’ In accordance with this recommendation, Congress appropriated on March 3, 1879, ‘for providing additional security against fire in the Smithsonian building, $3,000;” and in accordance with estimates submitted by the Institution, has subsequently appropriated for the same purposes— By act of Congress, sundry civil act: March 3, 1883.2... .<0-~2-.e>ondeeeg= -ge- bandana ne eee $50, 000 SUNY 1p WOO. oc ap oe eta Gok soe tng = ee ewas Shae ep ose cs ae eee 15, 000 March 3, 1885.....-- eeesbecaddese sempre cnt cekenen tay ke ae oe eee 5, 600 March 3;y1887 2 22e 22s. eee ote ER Oe eee 15, 000 It is therefore evident that the justice and propriety of appropriations for this pur- pose have been well established. The portions of the building which are not fireproof are— The roof of the so-called ‘‘chapel’’ in the west wing, which contains collections whose mere money value is estimated at over $250,000, but whose value to science is inestimable. This is also the only portion of the building which is suitable to devote to donations of art objects, which may be expected when the Government provides a safe depository for them. The ceiling and part of the roof of the main exibition hall, now occupied by prob- ably the most extensive and valuable archeological collection in the United States, is of combustible material and in urgent need of repairs, the ceiling threatening to fall, in part, and crush the cases and their valuable contents, and possibly endanger the safety of visitors and employees. Both roofs are leaking, and these changes involve the replastering and repainting of the walls. The floor of the main hall, 200 by 50 feet, is worn out and needs renewal, and all this implies special temporary provision for the collection. The lower hall is now very dark, and in replacing the roof and ceiling of the upper story it is desirable that a large skylight and wellhole be inserted, which would greatly add to the comfort of visitors by increasing the light and providing better ventilation. FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1277 The rooms occupied by the Bureau of International Exchanges are in less need of repair, but some portion of the amount asked is intended to be devoted to the extreme east wing, occupied by these offices. In addition to what has been mentioned, there are wooden floors and other wood- work in the towers which are a source 6f danger, and it is to be observed that owing ‘to the crowded condition of the Museum it has been necessary to erect a paint shop filled with combustible material immediately against the south wall of the building and close to the roof, whose dangerous condition has just been described. The present state of things is one of continual menace. I have only to say that I shall be happy to submit, if desired, the detailed estimates on which the general estimate is founded. The sum asked for is believed to be necessary to make the whole of the Smithsonian building fireproof where it is not so, and to put it otherwise in such condition as to insure the safety of the collections and the visitors. Very respectfully, yours, S. P. Lanatey, Secretary. Hon. Sern L. MILiiken, Chairman Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds, House of Representatives. June 24, 1890—Senate. Mr. Justin S. Morriiz, from Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds, reported an amendment to be proposed to sundry civil bill for 1891. Referred to Committee on Appropriations. July 9, 7890—Senate. Mr. W. B. Atuison, from Committee on Appropriations, reported item of $45,000 in sundry civil bill. July 14, 1890—Senate. The reading of the sundry civil bill for 1891 (H. 10884) was resumed. The amendment of the Committee on Appropriations was, on page 32, under the head of ‘‘Smithsonian Institution,” after line 11, to insert: [The same as S. 2033, of January 27, 1890. | Mr. F. M. Cockrety. Has any bill been passed by the Senate pro- viding for the erection of that building ¢ Mr. W. B. Arison. The bill has passed the Senate, I understand, for this; and the amendment was offered from the Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds and sent to the Committee on Appro- priations. Mr. O. H. Prarr. I think the bill passed early in the session. Mr. G. F. Epmunps. This amendment is apparently for mere repa- ration. Mr. Axuison. It is. It is repairs for the west wing of the Smith- sonian Institution. Mr. Epmunps. There is no new building about it that I can see. Mr. Auuison. If the Senator from Missouri will take a walk through the park there, he will see that it is very necessary, The amendment was agreed to. ; 1278 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. August 2, 1890—House. Sundry civil bill for 1891 under consideration: The Speaker (Mr. T. B. Reep). The question is on nonconcurring in the Senate amendment [to fireproof Smithsonian building]. The question was put, and the SpEaKER announced that the ‘‘ayes” seemed to have it. Mr. W. C. P. Brecxinriper, of Kentucky. Division. The House divided; and there were ayes 93, noes 36. Mr. J. H. Roecrrs. Let us have tellers. The question was taken on ordering tellers. The Speaker. Thirty gentlemen have arisen in support of the demand, and tellers are ordered. The gentleman from Arkansas [Mr. Rogers] and the gentleman from Illinois [Mr. Cannon] will take their places as tellers. Mr. Cannon. Mr. Speaker, we had just as well have the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. Yeas, 144; nays, 18; not voting, 165. The amendment not concurred in. August 7, 1890—Senate. ; Mr. Wri11am B. Axuiison, from conference committee on sundry civil bill, reported that the House recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the Senate and agree to the same with an amendment: For fireproofing the so-called chapel of the west wing of the Smithsonian building, and for repairing the roof of the main building and the ceiling and plastering of the main hall of the building, $25,000; said work to be done under the supervision of the Architect of the Capitol, with the approval of the Regents of the Smithsonian Insti- ‘tution, and no portion of the appropriation to be used for sky-lights in the roof nor for well-hole in the floor of the main building. Agreed to. August 7, 1890—House. Passed. August 30, 1890. Sundry civil act for 1891. For fire-proofing the so-called chapel of the west wing of the Smith- sonian building, and for repairing the roof of the main building and the ceiling and plastering of the main hall of the building, $25,000, said work to be done under the supervision of the Architect of the Capitol, with the approval of the Regents of the Smithsonian Institu- tion, and no portion of the appropriation to be used for sky-lights in the roof nor for well-hole in the floor of the main building, $25,000. (Stat. XX VI, 383.) . FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1279 BUREAU OF FINE ARTS. December 4, 1889—Senate. Mr. W. Catt introduced bill (S. 39): That there be, and is hereby, created in the Smithsonian Institution a Bureau called the Bureau of the Fine Arts, the management of which isintrusted to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. Sxc. 2. That the purpose and duties of this Bureau shall be to aid in the development of the fine arts in the several States and Territories of the United States by the repro- duction, for the use of art schools and academies, of casts of statuary and other objects used in giving instruction in art; by preparing and distributing plans for the construc- tion of buildings and the adaptation of rooms suitable for use as art schools, with printed plans for the organization of various grades of art academies and classes; by causing to be held annually, in Washington, District of Columbia, a public exhibition of works of art, open to all desiring to exhibit, in which the fairest possible oppor- tunity for exposition shall be afforded all contributors; and by the publication of an annual register containing an account of new discoveries, inventions, and methods of instruction useful to students of art, together with a report of the progress of the fine arts in the United States. Src. 3. That the reproductions and publications of the Bureau shall be distributed among institutions of art, under such regulations as the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution may establish. Src. 4. That the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution shall provide suitable quarters for the holding of the annual art exhibition. Src. 5. That for the purpose of carrying on the operations of this Bureau there be, and is hereby, appropriated, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 188 , the sum of $———, to be paid by the Secretary of the Treasury out of any moneys in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, and expended under the direction of the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. Referred to Committee on the Library. VAIL ORIGINAL TELEGRAPHIC RECEIVER. December 4, *889—Senate. Mr. J. R. McPuerson introduced bill (S. 256): Whereas Stephen Vail, of Morristown, New Jersey, has in his possession the orig- inal telegraphic instrument or recording receiver, invented by his father, Alfred Vail, used upon the first telegraphic line ever constructed (that between Washington and Baltimore), and to transmit the first message ever sent, ‘‘What hath God wrought”’ and Whereas Mr. Vail has in his possession abundant and satisfactory proof of its authenticity, and the proposed disposition of it is strongly recommended by the offi- cers of the Smithsonian Institution (where it is now on exhibition) : Therefore, Be it enacted, etc., That the sum of $10,000 be, and the same is hereby, appropri- ated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the purchase of said telegraph instrument or recording receiver, upon the production of such evi- dence of its authenticity as shall be satisfactory to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. Referred to Committee on the Library. CAPRON JAPANESE COLLECTION. December 4, 1889—Senate. Mr. D. W. VoorHers introduced bill (S. 321): That the sum of $14,675 be, and the same is hereby, appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the purchase of ‘‘the Capron 1280 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. collection of Japanese works of art,’? now on 2 iiccary deposit in the National Museum at Washington, District of Columbia. Referred to Committee on the Library. December 18, 1889—House. Mr. C. A. Russewu introduced bill (H. 2753) same as 8. 321. February 18, 1890—Senate. Mr. VoorHEEs, from Committee on the Library, submitted report (S. 317) on bill (S. 321). The Committee on the Library, to which was referred the bill (S. 321) providing for the purchase of ‘‘the Capron collection of Jap- anese works of art,” reports the same favorably, and recommends its passage. This collection was made by the late Gen. Horace Capron, a gentle- man of great refinement, culture, and learning, while he was United States minister [commissioner] to Japan. It was carefully examined by Prof. G. Brown Goode, the assistant to the late Prof. Spencer F. Baird, Director of the National Museum, who estimated its value at about the sum proposed in the bill to be appropriated. The committee thinks the Government should have the ownership of this collection. It would be placed in the National Museum, where the many visitors from all parts of the country could see it. ‘‘THE ORDER OF THE RISING SUN.’ The honor conferred upon a distinguished American by the Emperor of Japan. As matter of peculiar and entertaining interest, the Post has been permitted to make the following extracts from the records of Gen. Horace Capron, formerly Commissioner of Agriculture, who resigned that position in 1871 to accept one from the Japanese Government, together with translations of the documents accom- panying the late honor conferred upon him by the Emperor of Japan. When it is considered that eight years have passed since General Capron retired from the service of that Government, during which the various works inaugurated by him have been gradually developed under the eye of His Imperial Majesty, it can but be considered creditable to American enterprise. The work commenced by him was not the simple improvement of the agriculture of Japan, as many have supposed, but comprehended the development of a great island of 35,739 square miles, which to that period had remained a ‘‘terra incognita,”’ and the inauguration of a state, with all the industries and appliances, scientific and practical, of a new civilization, the influences of which works have extended over the whole Empire. It can not be better explained than in copying the following abstract from a correspondence of our minister to Japan as follows: ‘Tt may well be said there was no state in Yesso in the sense that men constitute a state when General Capron first took charge of that island, and it may also be said that when he left it a state was inaugurated with the introduction of the various industries and appliances which will secure food, clothing, and shelter to a nation.” The following are translations of the papers accompanying the decoration conferred upon him:by the Emperor: (No. 1.) ; January 16, 1884. Drar Str: His Excellency Ito Hirobumi, the acting minister of foreign affairs, Tokyo, instructs me by cablegram to inform you that His Majesty the Emperor of FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1281 Japan has been pleased to confer upon you the decoration of the Second Order of the Rising Sun. I trust that the same will be transmitted to you in due course. Iam, sir, very respectfully, your obedient servant, Naito Ruwiro, Chargé @ Affaires. Gen. Horace Capron, Washington City. (No. 2.) ForEIGN OFFICE, Tokyo, January 18, 1884. (The 17th Year of Meiji.) Str: Gen. Horace Capron, of the United States of America, formerly commissioner and adviser in chief to the Kai Taki Shi, discharged his duties with great diligence “and much satisfaction for more than four years, from the fourth to the eighth Meiji inclusive. He visited the island of Hokkaido or Yesso many times and traversed its wilderness to observe its climate and to ascertain its mineral and other resources. He laid out the full plan and gave orders for the execution of various works, and he submitted all necessary reports with courtesy and kindness. Now the work of the said department has been nearly completed and the island placed in a condition to insure its future prosperity, with roads, harbors, factories, and public works established therein, showing the results and benefits of General Capron’s services. His Imperial Majesty has appreciated his work, and is now pleased to confer upon him the ‘‘Decoration of the Seeond Order of the Rising Sun.”’ I send you the said decoration, together with its indicative button, and the diploma for the decoration, which you will deliver to General Capron on their arrival. You will deliver the decoration to General Capron through the Department of State, thus to show our special appreciation of his services in a formal way, he haying resigned his office under the United States Government to accept one under ours. I hope General Capron may feel thus more honored for this formal way of transmitting the decoration. Ito Hirosumt, Counselor of State, Acting Minister of Foreign Affairs. Narro Rurt1ro, Chargé @ Affaires, Legation of Japan, Washington, D. C., U. S.A. (No. 3.) DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Washington, February 25, 1884. It gives me pleasure to transmit to you, at the instance of the Japanese legation at this capital, the accompanying decoration and diploma conferred upon you by His Imperial Majesty the Emperor of Japan, and to congratulate you upon this compli- mentary recognition of your personal services in that country. F I am, sir, your obedient servant, Frepx. T. FRELINGHUYSEN. Hon. Horace Capron, . Washington City, D. C. [Translation of diploma. ] Mutsu Hito, by the grace of Heaven, Emperor of Japan, and seated upon a throne occupied by the same dynasty from time immemorial, doth in token of our esteem hereby confer the Second Order of the ‘‘ Rising Sun”’ upon Horace Capron, late com- missioner and adviser in chief to the Kai Takti Shi department of our Government. In testimony whereof, we have set our hand and caused the Great Seal of Japan to be thereto affixed. H. Doc. 732——81 32 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Done at our palace in the city of Tokyo, on the eleventh day of the first month of the seventeenth year of Meiji, and the two thousand five hundred and forty- fourth year after the accession of the Emperor Jimmu. Mursu Hiro, Yomigemaie Laikamiton Ogin Ko, Keeper of the Order of the Rising Sun. March 22, 1890—Senate. Bill (S. 321) was announced as next in order on the Calendar. Mr. Francis M. CockreEu. I do not think, in view of everything in the country, the condition of the agricultural interests, and everything of the kind, that there is any pressing necessity for spending $14,000 ~ to buy that collection. So we will let the bill pass over. The Presrpine Orricer. The Senator from Missouri objects, and the bill will be passed over informally. March 29, 1890—Senate. Mr. Danie W. Vooruens. Task the indulgence of the Senate to call up Senate bill 321. Mr. J. SHerman. What is the amount appropriated? Mr. S. M. Cuttom. Fourteen thousand dollars. Mr. Voorueers. The Senator from Ohio is familiar with this subject. I will state that it is the amount fixed by the authorities of the Smith- sonian a year or more ago. The bill was reported after a very full examination by the Committee on the Library. It passed, I think, twice through the committee and was passed once by the Senate in a former Congress. The Senator from Massachusetts [Mr. Hoar], of the committee, is present. The Senator from New York [Mr. Evarts] is not here, but I hope the Senate will pass the bill. Mr. O. H. Prarr. Will the Senator be kind enough to explain to those Senators who have not had the time and opportunity to visit the National Museum what this collection of Japanese works consist of ¢ I simply want information about it. Mr. VoorHees. General Capron was abroad a number of years in the service of the Government in Japan, and when he returned he | brought a rare collection of those peculiar works of art for which Japanese civilization and skill are famous. The collection has been valued by those who are experts in that business, and this is the value placed on the collection by Spencer F. Baird and others connected with the Smithsonian Institution and the National Museum. The col- lection now belongs to Mrs. Capron, a very aged lady, General Capron being dead.. The matter, as the Senator from Massachusetts, as well as myself, can assure the Senate, has had very careful consideration, and I trust that no obstacle will be presented to the passage of the bill. Mr. I. G. Harris. What is the amount involved? Mr. Voorueers. Fourteen thousand and some hundred dollars. Mr. G. G. Vesr. I should like to ask my friend from Indiana a question. FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. ~ 1283 I do not know anything in the world about this matter, except that, I know that the prices paid for Japanese curios have gone down very much in the last two or three years. They used to be considered quite rare, but now hardly a week passes when there are not large auction sales in this city of Japanese articles. JI have never seen this collec- tion, and I do not know whether it consists of articles that can not be obtained elsewhere or whether they are antiques, which would give particular value to such articles, but I happen to know that all the large cities to-day are filled with Japanese curios. I simply want to inquire whether this price is considered as being the value to-day, or whether there has been any recent valuation, so as to know whether $14,000 is an exorbitant sum or not. Mr. Henry L. DAwEs rose. Mr. Vooruers. I yield to the Senator from Massachusetts. Mr. Dawes. I do not profess to know the value of such things, but 1 have had the opportunity to see the selections made by Mr. Capron, and they are not of any ordinary character, like those which are in the shops of cities. Mr. Voornesrs. Oh, no. Mr. Dawes. They are of a very rare kind and are nowhere to be found in any of the shops, and they are of inestimable value as com- pared with all those that are seen in shops. I would not undertake to express an opinion as to their value, but there are no such specimens of the wonderful art of the Japanese people as those that were collected by Mr..Capron. They are peculiarly valuable specimens of what is done in that country, and they are of great value of themselves, as compared with other specimens, though I am not able to express an opinion upon their money value. IJ know that heretofore they have been valued by those in whose judgment I should have great confi- dence as being of great value to this country to obtain the possession of and keep in the National Museum. Mr. Vooruees. In further answer to the Senator from Missouri I will state that during the last session of Congress there was a letter read here which is in the Congressional Record. It ought to be on file now. I tried to find it a little whileago. The Senator from Mas- sachusetts knows of the existence of the official communication which we secured from the Smithsonian in respect to the value of these rich and rare specimens of works of art in Japan, and the amount appro- priated in the bill is the value placed by them. We did not pretend to appraise them ourselves; we did not know how; and so we secured the written official statement. of what such works would be worth at this time, and that was within the last year or eighteen months. Mr. E. Hate. Mr. President, these works are of such transcendent value that it raises a condition of wonderment in the human mind that has ever considered them why they were ever allowed to be brought 1284 ; CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. from the country where they were made. They are not works that can be estimated by any valuation or appraisal, but depend largely upon the imagination. Having had some experience in committees that have viewed and investigated such matters, I have found that no two persons agree as to their value. They are somewhat like the Sibylline Leaves. They come to us first with an estimate of a few thousand dollars, as these did originally Mr. Voorness. The Senator is mistaken about that. Mr. Hate. And they have been constantly increasing in value. It is an additional argument in favor of passing this bill and getting rid of it, that if we do not pass it now at $14,000 it will come in next year at $20,000. The Senator from Massachusetts [Mr. Dawes] says to me in an aside that he has no doubt that will be so. The Senator from Indiana will appreciate that consideration. It may be that he would favor it if more money should be called for. Mr. Voorness. That is an argument in favor of the passage of the bill now. Mr. Dawes. Will the Senator allow me to interrupt him? Mr. Hate. Certainly. Mr. Dawes. I have no doubt that as years go on more and more the real value of these specimens will be appreciated, and that will increase their value in the market. I agree with the Senator that if we had purchased them five years ago in the market we could have got them for much less than now. Every year that we come to be more and more familiar with what is done there these specimens will be prized above all others. Mr. Harr. What I was coming at is that there is a pronounced demand for this kind of appropriation from the laboring men and the farmers of the country. The representatives of that sentiment which the Senator from Indiana so earnestly and eloquently urged upon the Senate the other day, the downtrodden and oppressed farmers of the country, who are disregarded by Congress, who are passed over in their claims in favor of fanciful things and in favor of monopolists, desire this appropriation! Nothing can carry to the breast of the Western farmer so complete and thrilling a feeling of satisfaction with the Congress of the United States as to know that it is hunting up old relics from Japan, collections that have been for years and years here in Washington, and without which the Government has gone on in avery respectable fashion, but which now, in obedience to their demand, are being purchased for their benefit! It is not a fanciful thing, Mr. President; it is a real thing, the desire that the great West has for the purchase of these products of Japanese art! Fourteen thousand dollars is a small sum to the farmer of the West. He is willing to expend it for these objects; he is entirely satisfied; and the Senator from Indiana is doing much in this cause that he is FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1285 now pleading to pacify the farmers whom the other day he unduly stirred up. I congratulate him that he is engaged now in a crusade that will be beneficial to the farmers of the country and will tend to make them more content. And for that reason, and to relieve the burdens under which they exist, I am going to yote with him, because I thought the other day that he was stimulating a feeling of discon- tent on the part of the farmers, and now I see that he has slept over it and that he has found something that they are interested in, and that he knows will go through, and we are all going to join him and put him in favor in sending this appropriation through. Mr. Voornesgs. Mr. President, I will forgive the very mean speech that preceded a very excellent conclusion and will ask for a vote, only saying that General Capron was a very acceptable Commissioner of Agriculture in his day, and this little appropriation goes to his widow in her poverty. Now I hope we shall have a vote. Mr. J. H. Berry. I desire to ask the Senator from Indiana if ‘it is true that these works of art have been offered for $2,000? Mr. Vooruess. I will not put it in any offensive way, but I will answer in this way: I was trying to tax my best recollection when the Senator made that statement, and my best recollection is—I am not to be held responsible if it is a little different from that-—that I introduced a bill for the purchase of the Capron collection for $10,000. Then the committee asked officially the officers who had these works in charge at the Smithsonian Institution for an estimate of their value, and they made an estimate over the amount that was asked for them. Then I amended the bill myself in accordance with it. I represent a constituency, Mr. President, who would not abolish the Smithsonian Institution or the National Museum, and I suppose the Senator from Maine [Mr. Hale] would criticise *them for not doing so; but, as I stated, I forgive him for his speech for the sake of the vote he is going to give. Mr. G. F. Hoar. Isuppose everybody is in favor of ornamenting this capital and making it to the American people who come here attractive to a reasonable and proper extent with works of art. A good many of us have voted for larger expenditures than this for single objects which hardly come within that designation when they are completed. I remember Mr. Sumner said that the most polite thing he ever knew in his life was when a distinguished Englishman walked with him straight by the statue of Andrew Jackson and did not manifest the slightest consciousness that there was such a thing in sight. Now, I thinkin the selection of these works we can trust, better than we can ourselves, the judgment of the men who have the charge of the Smithsonian Institution and the National Museum. Professor Baird, I believe, reserved this large space in the National Museum to their custody and exhibition; they are among the most attractive and 1286 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS interesting objects which are examined by the persons who go there, and he desired their purchase. I think I am not mistaken in making that assertion. The Senator from Indiana knows whether I am correct or not in that statement. Mr. VoorHeeEs. The Senator is correct about that. Mr. Hoar. When the present accomplished Secretary of the Smith- sonian Institution, who is not only one of the most distinguished and learned men in the country, but who has been a special student of the history of art, who is familiar with the history of the great works of art in the world, and who has been a special student in that most . delicate art matter of engraving, desires a small appropriation of this kind for an object of art to be preserved in his National Museum, and sets a price on it, I, for one, am willing to act upon his authority, and I do not think there is better authority in the country. The bill was reported to the Senate without amendment. Mr. J. Z. Georcr. Mr. President, in the absence of the Senator from Texas [Mr. Reagan], in order to guard the people against suck extrava- gant appropriations as this, I shall be compelled to put in my feeble protest against any such expenditure of the public money. I will not make any speech about it, for the reason that I can not get—let me see, what is the word/—I can not get the forgiveness of the Senator from Indiana |Mr. Voorhees] for making a mean speech in opposition to this bill by voting for it. My position is that I shall have to vote against it. Mr. Berry. Mr. President, I desire to say that while $14,000 is a small sum, it is an appropriation that ought not to be made. I fully agree with all the Senator from Indiana [Mr. Voorhees] so well said a few days ago in regard to the condition of the farmers of the country, and I furthernyore agree that this character of appropriation is not the kind that they approve, and I do not believe that it should be made by the Senate of the United States. It is practically admitted that these articles are not worth this sum of money and that the bill was originally introduced for a far less amount. The persons who own these works did not consider them worth $14,000, and yet the Senator from Indiana says he changed the amount on his own motion when the lady for whose benefit the appro- priation is to be made did not expect that amount. _ My. President, if it was our own money with which we were dealing we should have the right to take it and give it to this lady, to give her more than she asked, to give her more than it is admitted these articles are worth, and to give her more than they are valued’at, but I do not believe that I,as a Senator, here have the right to vote the people’s money in any such way, and therefore I am in earnest against this and all kindred appropriations. Mr. Vooruesgs. I am astonished at the inaccuracy of the Senator ~~ Fee we FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1287 from Arkansas [Mr. Berry], who is usually very accurate and fair. The amount was not changed on a claim of the claimant or on an esti- mate of more than the works were worth. I stated that I changed the face of the bill upon an official estimate made by experts in the Smith- sonian Institution upon the official request of the committee, and that that was the basis of changing the amount. That was the statement. Mr. Berry. I understood the Senator to state that the bill was originally introduced for $10,000, with which sum the owner of these articles was content. Is that correct? Mr. Voornesgs. | did not say whether she was content or not. I did not ask the poor, old, impoverished lady on that subject, but I did find out what the articles were said to be worth by those who were competent tojudge. I never jew and I never haggle and I never beat down, especially a widow woman in poverty, and I represent a con- stituency who do not expect me to do it. Mr. Berry. In regard to jewing and beating down the poor, and talking about a poor old woman, there are thousands of poor old women in the State of Indiana and.in Arkansas who are as much entitled to the consideration of the Congress of the United States as this lady or any other lady. When the Senator talks about never trying to beat down, that argu- ment goes very well with a man’s own property and his own money, but when we are dealing with other people’s money, I, for one, do not believe that we have a right to vote any more than the article we purchase is worth, and the fact that the lady is old and poor makes no difference in that particular, if we are dealing with her for articles which the Government desires to possess. That is my idea of the right and wrong of the proposition, and no remarks about the character of constituency the Senator represents, or that I may represent, will affect me when it comes to voting away money which we adimit is not ours, and when the Senator admits that the bill has been changed from the amount provided for when it was originally introduced. I ask for the yeas and nays on the passage of the bill. The Vice-PREstIDENT (Mr. Levi P. Morron). The question is on ordering the bill to be engrossed for a third reading. Does the Sena- tor from Arkansas desire the yeas and nays on that question ? Mr. Berry. No; | ask for the yeas and nays on the passage of the bill. The bill was ordered to be engrossed for a third reading, and was read the third time. The Vick-PRESsIDENT. On the passage of the bill the Senator from Arkansas asks for the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered; and the Secretary proceeded to call the roll. 1288 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Mr. Hae (when his name was called). I am paired with the Senator from Kentucky [Mr. Beck]. Mr. Wapr Hampron (when his name was called). I am paired with the Senator from Rhode Island [Mr. Dixon]. Mr. M. S. Quay (when his name was called). I am paired with the junior Senator from West Virginia [Mr. Faulkner]. If he were pres- ent, I should vote ‘‘ yea.” Mr. P. Sawyer (when his name was called). I am paired with the Senator from Georgia [Mr. Colquitt] on all political questions; but I do not consider this as a question of that kind, and I vote ‘‘ yea.” Mr. W. C. Squire (when his name was called). I am paired with the Senator from Virginia [Mr. Daniel]. If he were present, I should vote ee yea. 9 Mr. D. Turpre (when his name was called). I am paired with the Senator from Minnesota [Mr. Davis] and withhold my vote. Mr. G. G. Vesr (when his name was called). I am paired with the Senator from Kansas [Mr. Plumb]. I do not know how he would vote on this question and withhold my vote. Mr. E. K. Witson of Maryland (when his name was called). I am paired with the Senator from Iowa [Mr. Wilson]. The roll call was concluded. Mr. G. F. Epmunps. I believe the Senator from Alabama [Mr. Pugh] has not voted. The Vicr-PrestpEnt. He has not voted. Mr. Epmunps. I am paired with him, subject to making a quorum, and so I withhold my vote unless it be necessary to make a quorum. Mr. Quay. I understand from Senators on the other side that my pair with the Senator from West Virginia [Mr. Faulkner] does not apply to this bill in case my vote is necessary to make a quorum. _ Understanding that a quorum has not yet voted, 1 feel at liberty to vote, and I vote ‘‘yea.” . Mr. Squire. I understand the Senator from Virginia [Mr. Daniel] with whom I am paired, if present, would vote ‘‘ yea,” and therefore I am at liberty to vote, and I vote ‘‘ yea.” Mr. A. S. Pappock. I am assured that the Senator from Louisiana [Mr. Eustis] with whom I am paired, if here, would vote ‘‘ yea,” and I vote ‘‘ yea.” Mr. Epmunps. May I ask if a quorum has voted? The Vicr-PresipEnT. Not yet. Mr. Epmunps. I will respond to my name then. I vote ‘‘ nay.” Mr. Vest. I am at liberty to vote to make a quorum, and I vote 74 nay. 93 Mr. Wutson, of Maryland. In order to make a quorum I vote. I vote ‘‘nay.” ee ey ae FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1289 The result was announced—yeas 27, nays 15; as follows: Yeras.—Allen, Blackburn, Blair, Butler, Call, Chandler, Cullom, Dawes, Dolph, Gorman, Hoar, Kenna, McMillan, Manderson, Mitchell, Morrill, Paddock, Payne, Quay, Sawyer, Sherman, Spooner, Squire, Stockbridge, Teller, Voorhees, Wash- burn—27. Nays.—Bate,’ Berry, Casey, Cockrell, Coke, Edmunds, Frye, George, Ingalls, Pierce, Platt, Reagan, Vest, Walthall, Wilson of Maryland—15. ' AssEntT.—Aldrich, Allison, Barbour, Beck, Blodgett, Brown, Cameron, Colquitt, . Daniel, Davis, Dixon, Eustis, Evarts, Farwell, Faulkner, Gibson, Gray, Hale, Hampton, Harris, Hawley, Hearst, Higgins, Hiscock, Jones of Arkansas, Jones of Nevada, McPherson, Moody, Morgan, Pasco, Pettigrew, Plumb, Pugh, Ransom, Stanford, Stewart, Turpie, Vance, Wilson of Iowa, Wolcott. So the bill was passed. May 13, 1890—House. Mr. Cuarzes O’NerxL1, from Committee on the Library, submitted report (H. 1983) on H. 2753: The Committee on the Library, to which the bill (H. 2753) for the _ purchase of ‘‘the Capron collection of Japanese works of art” was referred, recommends its passage. This isa very valuable and instruc- tive collection, and it should be purchased and placed in the National Museum. The late Prof. Spencer F. Baird advised the purchase while he was Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, as have other scientists. Committed to Committee of the Whole. May 19, 1890—House. Mr. Cuarues O’NEILL, from Committee on the Library, submitted report (H. 2036) to accompany S. 321: The Capron collection consists of a large number of works of art, such as gold lacquers, bronzes, porcelains, screens, enamels, vases, swords, carvings in ivory and wood, gold and silver coins, and many other articles of curious workmanship, all illustrative of the history of Japan. They are displayed in cases at the National Museum, and for the last few years have been seen by thousands of visitors from all parts of the country. General Capron (formerly United States Commissioner of Agricul- ture) lived for several years in Japan, in high official position under the Government of that-country. He had special opportunities of gathering specimens of art, etc. Most of the lacquered work came from the private stores of the Tycoons, confiscated at the close of their reign by the government of the Mikado. These pieces bear the armorial insignia of the princely families in which, for centuries, they had been treasured. Some of the articles, it should be added, were derived from imperial sources as. presents. The collection was got together before attempts had been made to imitate these rare and unrivaled works of Old Japan. The old style of lacquered work required from four to six years to harden the 1290 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. . successive coatings; the productions of the present period are in every way inferior. The articles in this collection are not to be confounded with what of late years has been brought to America, and sold in quantities as works of Japanese art. In the first session of the Forty-ninth Congress Senator Voorhees submitted a report of the Committee on the Library recommending the purchase of the collection. The report, No. 196, contains a descriptive catalogue of 144 articles, and reference to it will afford a detailed description of these various specimens, their material, and what they signify in Japanese legend or history. Upon his return to the United States, General Capron generously placed these treasures in the Smithsonian Institution that the people visiting Washington might see and enjoy them. After his death (early in 1885) his widow, believing it to have been her husband’s wish that the collection should be kept together as a whole and ultimately become the property of the Government, signified her desire to leave it in the custody of the Smithsonian. When the National Museum was com- pleted the cases were removed thither, where the collection has con- tinued to the present time to be a conspicuous attraction. It interests not alone the art student and the designer, but all classes of visitors from every part of the country. This committee in the Forty-ninth and in the Fiftieth Congresses recommended its purchase, but no action was had upon the bills in the House. Professor Baird, writing January 14, 1887, to Mr. Singleton, then chairman of this committee, after speaking of the quality of the workmanship, etc., says: We should consider the acquisition of the collection of great importance, and its removal. from our cases would make a noticeable gap in the Japanese series. The price at which the collection is offered is a reasonable one; as the articles, if sold separately, would probably bring a considerably larger amount. (House Report No. 4000, second session, Forty-ninth Congress. ) The price of $14,675 was fixed by impartial and trustworthy officials of the Government, four years ago, and accompanied by the statement that the collection ‘‘ is constantly increasing in value.” In view of these facts, and believing it to be an unusual opportunity, in the line of a wise and judicious expenditure for that great resort of our people, the National Museum, to acquire a collection of very great value, your committee report the bill back with the recommendation that it do pass. Committed to Committee of the Whole. ‘ June 14, 1890—Senate. Mr. Wiuram M. Evarts, from Committee on the Library, reported an amendment to be proposed to sundry civil bill for 1891 (H. 10884): ‘For the purchase of the Capron collection, now on exhibition at the National Museum, of the estate of the late Horace Capron, the sum of $14,675. | . FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1291 Referred to Committee on Appropriations. March 3, 1897. Sundry civil act for 1892. For the purchase of ‘‘the Capron collection of Japanese works of art,” now on temporary deposit in the National Museum at Washington, District of Columbia, $10,000. (Stat., XX VI, 963.) REPORT OF SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION. December 4, 1889—Senate. Mr. J. S. Morrixz introduced joint resolution (S. 3): That hereafter there be printed of the annual reports of the Smithsonian Institu- tion and of the National Museum, in two octavo volumes, annually, 16,000 extra copies, of which 3,000 copies shall be for the use of the Senate, 6,000 for the use of the House of Representatives, and 7,000 for the use of the Smithsonian Institution. Referred to Committee on Printing. December 5, 1889—Senate. Mr. 8. M. Cuttom introduced joint resolution (S. 13): e That there be printed of the report of the Smithsonian Institution and of the National Museum for the years ending June 30, 1888, and June 30, 1889, in two octavo volumes for each year, 19,000 extra copies, of which 3,000 shall be for the use of the Senate, 6,000 for the use of the House of Representatives. and 10,000 for the use of the Smithsonian Institution. Referred to Committee on Printing. April 26, 1890—House. Mr. JosEpH WHEELER introduced resolution (H. 157), to print report of the Smithsonian Institution and National Museum. Referred to Committee on Printing. May 27, 1890—House. Mr. C. A. Russevu reported substitute concurrent resolution. Passed. June 17, 1890—Senate. ' Mr. J. R. Hawrey, from Committee on Printing, submitted report (S. 1375), to accompany House concurrent resolution authorizing the printing of 16,000 copies of the report of the Smithsonian Insti- tution and National Museum for the year ending June 30, 1888, and for the year ending June 30, 1889, in two octavo volumes for each year, 16,000 copies of each report, of which 3,000 copies shall be for the use of the Senate, 6,000 copies for the use of the House of Repre- sentatives, and 7,000 copies for the use of the Smithsonian Institution. The Committee on Printing, to whom was referred the above con- current resolution, having considered the same, report it back with the recommendation that it do pass. The number of copies provided for and the distribution of the same is the same as in previous years, and the cost will be about $8,000 for each report. Adopted. 1292 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. December 10, 1890—House. Mr. JosrpH WHEELER introduced concurrent resolution to print report of Smithsonian Institution and National Museum for year end- ing 30th of June, 1890. Referred to Committee on Printing. March 2, 1891—House. Passed. March 3, 1891—Senate. Mr. Cuarues F. Manperson, from Committee on Printing, reported favorably the concurrent resolution: Resolved, etc., That there be printed of the reports of the Smithsonian Institution and of the National Museum for the year ending June 30, 1890, in two octavo vol- umes, 19,000 extra copies, of which 3,000 copies shall be for the use of the Senate, 6,000 copies for the use of the House of Representatives, 7,000 copies for the use of the Smithsonian Institution, and 3,000 copies for the use of the National Museum. Mr. ArtHur P. Gorman. I ask my colleague of the Committee on Printing what is the estimated cost of printing these reports for this year. Mr. Manperson. The Smithsonian report was made to the House of Representatives. I can only give an approximate estimate. Mr. Gorman. Is any special appropriation made? Mr. Manperson. No; this is a concurrent resolution in the usual form. The Vicr-Prestpent (Mr. Levi P. Morton). The question is on concurring in the resolution. Concurred in. ROCK CREEK PARK. December 4, 1889—Senate. Mr. Jonn SHERMAN introduced Dill (S. 4), establishing the Rock Creek Park. Referred to Committee on the District of Columbia. Mr. J. J. IN@ALts introduced bill (S. 494). Referred to Committee on the District of Columbia. December 21, 1889—Senate. Mr. J. J. Ineays reported with amendments bill (S. 4). Referred to Calendar. January 28, 1890—Senate. Bill (S. 4) amended and passed. February 6, 1890—House. Bill (S. 4) laid before the House. Referred to Committee on the District of Columbia. March 18, 1890—House. ; Mr. W. W. Grout reported with amendments 5. 4. Referred to Committee of Whole. FLFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. ° 12938 March 24, 1890—Housé. Mr. W. W. Grout called up. Not acted upon by Committee of Whole. April 26, 1890—House. Mr. J. C. Burrows reported with amendments and Mr. L. KE. Ark1n- son asked House to agree. Refused to pass. May 26, 1890—House. S. 4 passed amended. June 6, 1899—Senate. House amendments to $. 4 disagreed to and conferees appointed: Mr. I. G. Harris, Mr. S. J. McMinuan, and Mr. A. Hieerns. June 12, 1890—House. ’ House insisted on amendments to 8. 4, and appointed conferees: Mr. W. W. Grout, Mr. L. E. Arxrnson, and Mr. J. J. Hempuiiy. June 17, 1890—Senate. Mr. J. J. INGALLS appointed as conferee in place of Mr. McMILuan, excused. : September 25, 1890—House. The statement of the House conferees was read, as follows: The managers on the part of the House submit the following explana- tion of the report of the committee of conference on Senate bill No. 4, authorizing the establishing of a public parkin the District of Columbia: The Senate conferees agreed to recede from the disagreement of the Senate to the amendments of the House and to report a substitute con- taining practically all the provisions of the bill as it passed the House. It became necessary to prepare a substitute because of the many verbal and other’amendments that had to be adopted to make the bill as amended by the House complete and congruous. The first amendment adopted by the House provided that the park south of Broad Branch road and Blagden Mill road should be not less than 1,200 feet in width, including the bed of the creek, ‘‘ of which not less than 300 feet should be on either side of said creek, nor less than * 600 feet on either side of said creek.” This was manifestly a mistake, and the committee of conference adopted as a substitute for this a provision that the width of that portion of the park should not be more than 1,200 feet nor less than 600 feet, of which not less than 200 feet should be on either side of said creek. That makes the provision clear and carries out the intention of the House as the committee understood it. The second amendment relates to the commission. As the bill passed the House two commissions were provided for— one by section 2 of the original bill and one by the amendment offered by the gentleman from Illinois, Mr. Payson; and the duties imposed 1294 © CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. upon these two commissions were conflicting. The committee has provided for a commission of five persons and placed upon it all the duties laid upon the two commissions by the House bill as amended. The amendment offered by the gentleman from Illinois, Mr. Payson, and adopted by the House made necessary a change in the plan of condemning and paying for the property selected by the commission. Sections 3 and 4 of the House bill, which set out the mode of con- demnation, were stricken out by the committee of conference, and section 3 of the substitute bill inserted in their stead. In making these changes we have adopted the plan followed by the House for the condemnation of the zoological park as near as practica- ble. Section 6 of the substitute provides for the assessment of the value of the land taken upon the property directly benefited. It is the same provision as was contained in section 7 of the bill as it passed the House except as to some verbal amendments and one relating to the payment of persons whose lands may be taken. The committee were satisfied that the Government could not take the private property of the citizen without paying him for it, and as the House had provided that the benefits assessed upon the property directly benefited should be paid in one, two, three, and four years, and as the District appropriation bill, as agreed on in conference, exceeds the revenues of the District for this fiscal year, there seemed to be no alternative but to allow the District to borrow from the General Government temporarily that portion of expense required of the District, and that the same be paid in equal annual installments with interest at 3 per cent. This plan has been agreed on by the committee and made a part of the substitute bill. The numerous verbal amendments need not be specified in detail, as they do not alter the bill in any material way. Louis E. ATKINSON, JOHN J. HEMPHILL, Managers on the part of the House. The Speaker (Mr. T. B. REED). The question is on the adoption of the report. Mr. James BucHanan, of New Jersey. Mr. Speaker, I would like to get some information from the gentleman [Mr. Hemphill] who has presented this report before the vote is taken. I gather from the statement attached to this conference report that it will be nec- essary, in case this project goes through, for the District of Columbia to borrow temporarily from the General Government a certain amount of money to pay for the property to be condemned for the purposes of this park. Am I correct in that? EE ee ey ee ee ee FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1295 Mr. J. J. Hempuiiy. | will state to the gentleman that at the time this report was prepared we were in the last fiscal year, and we put that provision in it because the appropriation seemed to carry all the money that was then in the District treasury. Mr. Bucuanan, of New Jersey. Then am I correct in under stand- ing the gentleman to say that it will not be necessary for the District to borrow money for this purpose? Mr. Hempurtu. No; I can not say that it will not be necessary dur- ing this fiscal year. We have provided in the bill that the District may borrow the money at 3 per cent. Mr. Bucuanan, of New Jersey. That is what I am trying to get at, whether if this park is established it necessitates the District making a loan and paying for the land. Mr. Hemputtt. It does. Mr. Bucuanan, of New Jersey. To what extent? Mr. Hemputtt. To the extent of one-half the amount. Mr. Bucuanan, of New Jersey. What is the amount? Mr. Hempuiiy. Twelve hundred thousand dollars. Mr. Bucuanan, of New Jersey. Then if this bill becomes a law it will be necessary for the District of Columbia to borrow $600,000 to pay for this land. Mr. Hempni. Yes, sir. Mr. Bucuanan, of New Jersey. Does the gentleman think the Dis- trict ought to do that? _ Mr. Hempentiy. I do; and the House has practically agreed to that already by a large vote. I will say to the gentleman that the value of the improvement to adjacent property is to be assessed upon that property, which assessmept the bill passed by the House allows the owners of the property to pay in four annual installments. Until the revenue comes in from the assessments upon the benefited property there must be a borrowing by the District. Mr. Bucwanan, of New Jersey. And the General Government, which forces this park upon the people of the District, generously compels them to pay interest meanwhile. Mr. Hemeniiy. It may be generous or not, as the gentleman may look at it. Mr. Bucuanan, of New Jersey. I do not think it is. Mr. Hempuiiy. Well, that has already been agreed upon. Mr. Bucnanan, of New Jersey... I opposed the proposition when it was up before. Mr. Cannon. I wish to inquire of the gentleman from South Caro- lina [Mr. Hemphill] whether the conference ‘committee took into con- sideration the necessity or propriety of increasing the rate of taxation in this District, so that this park may be established and the legitimate expenses of the District in other directions may be borne. 1296 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Mr. Hemenuitu. That matter was in a general way discussed, but the conference committee, I would suppose, had no authority to pro- vide for levying any additional tax; such levy must be made by separate action. Mr. J. G. Cannon. It seems to me that when a conference committee submits a report which necessitates an expenditure of $1,200,000 and a large expenditure in perpetuity, the committee could at least have submitted a proposition to raise the necessary funds—first, by borrow- ing (which has been provided for); and, secondly, by levying a tax to pay for this property which you think it wise to buy. Mr. Hempuity. Well, Mr. Speaker, the increase that has taken place in the value of property in this District on account of the street railroads and various other improvements will certainly bring about the collection of a very large additional revenue, though the rate of assessment may remain the same. But, of course, I can not figure on that until the returns come in. Mr. Cannon. I have been hearing statements of that kind for a great many years; but somehow the expenditures for one thing and another seem to increase a little faster than the revenues, notwithstand- ing the growth and improvement of the city. Mr. Hempuiti. Well, I will join the gentleman in trying to regu- late that matter by any bill which may come up here. Mr. Cannon. I would be very gladif this report could be sent back to the conference committee, so that between now and next December they may ascertain, first (and they can tell by that time), what the revenues ought to be for this fiscal year; secondly, if those revenues should not be sufficient to purchase this park or the District’s share of it, then to ascertain to what extent taxatign should be increased for the purpose of meeting this expenditure. It seems to me that in the closing days of this session of Congress, with the revenues of the Dis- trict for the fiscal year unascertained, it would be wise either to let this conference report go over without final action or to vote the report down and send the matter back to the conference committee, that fuller inquiry may be made and the result embodied in a report at the beginning of the next session. Mr. Hempuity. Well, Mr. Speaker Mr. W. J. Sronn, of Kentucky. In addition to what has been said by the gentleman from Illinois [Mr. Cannon], I would like to suggest’ that this conference committee be directed to report some plan by which the Government of the United States can be assured of the repayment of this money. Mr. Hemenity. Why, under this bill there is no doubt in the world in regard to that; it is just as clear as-the nose on a man’s face. Mr. Sronr, of Kentucky. What sort of security has the Govern- ment in that respect ? — = ee ee FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1297 Mr. Hempur. It has the right to levy special assessments upon the adjoining property in proportion to the benefit of this improve- ment, and not only adjoining property, but all property directly benefited. Mr. A. J. Hopkins. And does not the expense so levied become a lien on the property ? Mr. Hempum. Oh, yes; and it bears interest. Under this bill we simply provide for a temporary loan as to a large part of the expense for the purpose of getting control of this property at once, instead of waiting until it shall be more valuable. Mr. Srone, of Kentucky. Do you regard it as a wise thing for the Government to enter into the business of lending money to cities, cor- porations, or anybody else? Mr. Hempurii. No; I do not say it is wise for the Government to enter into any such business; but I do say that when the Government undertakes to govern the capital of the nation and to legislate for it through Congress, and undertakes to bear half the expenses of the government of the city, it is wise and proper to make such financial arrangements as will save the people expense. Mr. D. Kerr, of Iowa. If the assessments on the adjacent property * do not cover this expense, then there is no other provision at all for meeting it. Mr. Hempnry. No, sir; the overinaont stands whatever part of the expense may not ie recovered from the property owners; but from the best information I can gather (of course I can not tell what is going to be ascertained as the value of the property) the amount of actual expense to the Government under this bill will be comparatively small; and some gentlemen say it will be nothing. Of course I simply give my opinion, founded upon the best information I can gather. Mr. Horxtns. It must be something. Mr. Hempnuity. There have been instances in this country where every cent of the expenses of a park of this kind has been assessed on the adjoining property, and it was thought a wise thing. Mr. Kerr, of Iowa. Has that ever happened except in a single instance in Chicago ? Mr. Hempntty. I can cite that one case of my own er Mr. G. E. Apams. There were three instances in Chicago. Mr. Bucuanan, of New Jersey. This bill as now reported provides, I understand, for a loan by the Government to the District, and as security for that loan there is the contingency that,money may be obtained by“assessments levied upon the property which may be bene- fited—property adjoining or elsewhere. I understand the gentleman from South Carolina to say that there is no other contingency under which repayment of this loan may be assured; and he calls this a slight expense. Now, I want to ask the gentleman this question: Does he not H. Doc. 7832——82 1298 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. know that every Democratic newspaper will charge this amount of $1,200,000 to the sum total of appropriations made by Congress this year? Does he not know that the orators of his party will flaunt this from every stump as a part of the ‘‘ wasteful extravagance of a Repub- lican Congress ?” Mr. Hempniiu. Well, if any Democratic orator or Democratic newspaper chooses to make capital out of this, that is something they have a right to do, as a matter of course. But I will state here, and I will state anywhere, that I think it a wise and judicious expenditure, and in so far as my knowledge goes of the business of the District of Columbia I have never known money spent which, in my judgment, will be of more benefit to the people of the country and of the District than this. I believe it will save hundreds of thousands of dollars and give many benefits in addition. That is my honest conviction. Mr. Bucuanan, of New Jersey. Then I am authorized to quote that in opposition to such statements of Democratic orators or news- papers / Mr. Hempuity. You are, so far as I am concerned. Mr. C. A. Hixu. Let me ask the gentleman a question. If I remem- ber the reading of the report, the bill provides in substance that upon | making a map or plat of the proposed park and filing it of record the title shall pass to the United States. Mr. Hempuiiy. Provided the money is paid. Mr. Hitz. Well, it says ‘‘subject to the payment of compensation as hereinafter provided.” Mr. Hempuimt. Yes, sir; but the money must be paid before the title passes. Provision is made that when the hands of the Govern- ment is laid on the property it shall remain in sta¢w quo until the money is paid. Mr. Hitu. You do not understand, then, that it passes title before the compensation is made? Mr. Hemputiy. Not at all. On the contrary, we considered that fully, and were satisfied that we could not appropriate any man’s. property until he was paid for it. Mr. JosErpH D. Taytor. Let me ask the gentleman whether the people who are to pay the assessment levied upon their property, by the supposed increase of value which will accrue from this park, are in favor of the passage of the bill and are consenting to the proposition to lay out a park to take possession of a portion of their property 4 Mr. Hempumn. Well, I do not know exactly who the owners of the property will be. Some are in favor of the park provided it is located in one place, and some are in favor of it at another place; but the majority have expressed no decided conviction, I think. Mr. JosepH D. Taytor. They have not been here protesting against it? —E —_—sr FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1299 Mr. Hempuiiu. No, sir; not at all. Mr. JosepH D. Taytor..And the plan has been made public for some time? Mr. Hempniuyi. Oh, yes; it has been a matter of consideration for a long time. The Spraxer. The question is on the adoption of the report. The question was taken; and the SPEAKER announced that the report was adopted. Mr. W. S. Hotman. I demand a division. Mr. Hempuiiy. Let me state this, Mr. Speaker: The Senate has practically agreed to the House bill except that the form of the bill has been necessarily changed to meet the action of the House itself. Gen- tlemen will remember the amendment of the gentleman from Illinois which was inserted in the bill, and we were obliged to shape the bill so as to make it symmetrical in order to conform to that action. Now, I think the best thing to do is to adopt this provision as we have got it. It is about the first time that the Senate has agreed to anything we have done here, and we had better take advantage of it and make the most of it. The Speaker. The Chair will remind the gentleman that the House is dividing. Mr. W. McApoo. Let me ask the gentleman from South Carolina this question: Whether the Senate have changed the boundaries pro- vided in the House bill? Mr. Hemputiru. Practically not at all. The Speaker. The Chair will again remind gentlemen that the House is dividing, and the question is on the adoption of the report, on which the gentleman from Indiana demands a division. The question was taken; and upon a division there were—ayes 90, noes 41. Mr. Hotman. No quorum. Mr. J. A. ANDERSON, of Kansas, and Mr. Kerr, of Iowa, demanded the yeas and nays. . The yeas and nays were ordered. The question was taken; and there were—yeas 123, nays 65, not voting 137. So the report was adopted. September 25, 1890—Senate. Mr. J. J. Incatts. I rise to a privileged question. I present the report of the committee of conference on the bill (S. 4) authorizing the establishing of a public park in the District of Columbia. The Prestpine Orricer (Mr. Frye in the chair). The conference report presented by the Senator from Kansas will be read. Mr. Inearis. I would suggest for the convenience of Senators that this report is somewhat long and will take perhaps ten or fifteen min- 1300 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. utes to read. I will ask, if there be no ee that it may be con- sidered to-night. The Presipine Orricer. The question is on concurring in the report of the committee of conference. Mr. A. P. Gorman. Does the Senator from Kansas desire this report to be acted upon now, or will he permit it to be printed and go over until to-morrow ? Mr. Ineatts. I should prefer, unless there is some reason to the contrary, that it may be now considered. Mr. Gorman. I trust the Senator from Kansas will favor us with an explanation of the report. Mr. Ineatts. Its provisions are generally known, and they are simple. It provides for the acquisition of a tract of land not exceed- ing 2,000 acres in the valley of Rock Creek, at an expenditure of not to exceed $1,200,000, one-half of which is to be paid by the Govern- ment of the United States and one-half from the revenues of the Dis- trict, in four equal annual installments. It has been discussed in both ‘Houses. The provisions have been generally disseminated through the press, and I believe that the measure, while not all that can be desired and in some respects not in accord with my own views, is generally approved. I think, unless the Senator from Maryland has some particular reason why further inquiry should be made, that I should prefer to have the report acted upon to-night. Mr. Gorman. I am very heartily in favor of the general proposi- tion, but in the reading of the report one or two things struck me as rather novel to be introduced in the District in an enterprise of this sort. The first was the fact that you assess, by a commission to be named by the bill, the benefits that accrue to the adjoining property. Mr. Incas. I did not like that. That was not in accord with my own views, but agreeing to it was the result of a compromise. Mr. Gorman. I am perfectly well aware that in quite a number of the large cities of the country such is the rule in the opening of streets and other improvements within the corporate limits, where the prop- erty advances in value rapidly and where the owner derives benefit from it, but, as I understand, this park is out some distance from the city of Washington, in the country. Mr. Ineatts. In the valley of Rock Creek. Mr. Gorman. The valley of Rock Creek, and it extends to the Mary- land line. Mr. Ineatts. It will extend to the District line, if the money holds out. Mr. Gorman. Very good, but the whole of it is located outside of the limits of the city of Washington, and the surrounding country con- sists of farms and dwellings and property not of very great value to-day. It does seem to me that to choose a commission of our own selection FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1301 for the purpose of ascertaining what benefit the park will be to the farming country that adjoins, without the right of appeal, as I under- stood from the reading, is a very extraordinary provision to introduce into a measure here. It is rather a hardship to these people, who practically have only farms and gardens. The other proyision to which I allude is that we are not only to have the engineer officer of the District of Columbia, who is an Army officer, but we add to the military government of this District, at least so far as this park is concerned, and intrust the expenditure of the money of the people of the District to another Army officer, the Chief of Engi- neers, a gentleman for whom I have the highest regard, and who, I believe from what I have seen of him, is probably the most capable officer I have ever known to occupy that position, and we all have per- fect confidence in him. But to put the money, one-half of which is to come from the tax-payers of the District of Columbia, practically under two Army officers, appointed for life, with no control of it by the people of the District and no way to reach it, is going beyond any- thing heretofore contemplated. I had hoped we would in the course of time, and in a very short time, eliminate that military feature from the management of the affairs of the District of Columbia and put it all in the hands of civilians; but under the provisions of this report we are adding to and extending their power and authority. As I caught the reading of the report, these are the two prominent features in it, and I suggest to the Senator from Kansas, as it is late in the evening, for it is now twenty minutes past 5 o’clock, that he let this matter go over until to-morrow morning and have the report printed, so that we may have an opportunity to look into it. Probably it is true that at this late day in the session, after the long conference which has been had, nothing better can be done; but with no disposition in the world, as the Senator understands perfectly well, to obstruct the adoption of the report, I think it is due that the Senator should permit us to look at it in print to-morrow morning. Mr. I. G. Harris. I will say to the Senator from Maryland that the report is already printed. It was printed by order of the committee. By sending to the room of the District Committee I doubt not we can get any number of printed copies that the Senators may desire to see. Mr. Gorman. I was not aware of that. I suggest to the Senator to let the report go over until to-morrow morning, so that we may have an opportunity to examine it. § Mr. Incauts. The request of the Senator from Maryland is reasona- ble, and if he desires to familiarize himself further with the provisions of the report I can not object. I can only add, however, that the report is in many particulars more obnoxious to me than it can be to the Sen- ator from Maryland. I believe that the provision that imposes one- half of the cost of the improvement upon the people of this District is 1302 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. wrong in principle and pernicious in practice. I think it is an unjust burden upon the already overtaxed resources of this people. The other points.the Senator makes are somewhat in accord with my own views, but the report, as is usual in such cases, was the result of a compromise. I do not think anything else can be done. I‘may add that the provisions of the report have been submitted to the people through the newspapers, and have been the subject of con- sideration and discussion for a number of months, the conferees hay- ing agreed, I think, in July last. There has been, so faras I know, no protest on the part of the people of the District against the report; on the contrary, it has been generally approved, and the decision has been regarded with favor and cordially acquiesced in by those most nearly interested. . Mr. H. W. Buarr. May I ask the Senator as to the extent of the surface that is appropriated by this bill? Mr. Ineatus. The quantity of land is not to exceed 2,000 acres and the expense not to exceed $1,200,000. Mr. Buatr. Can the Senator indicate the general form of this piece of land? Mr. Ineatzs. It follows the sinuosities of Rock Creek, beginning where the Zoological Park ends, and thence extending westward along the windings of the creek, comprising the banks and cliffs, if you may so describe them, on both sides of the creek to the line of Maryland. Mr. Buatr. With something like a uniform width of park? Mr. Ineauts. Not to exceed a certain amount on each side, the object being to exclude improved property, as far as possible, and establish a park that shall be limited to the valley of the creek, along which a road is to be maintained that shall run as at present and be pro- tected from any further change in the natural aspect of the region. If there is objection to the present consideration of the report, of course I consent that it may go over, but I ask that it may be printed, giving notice that at the earliest opportunity to-morrow I shall ask for its consideration. The Presipinc Orricer. Does the Senator ask that the report be printed ? Mr. Ineatts. I ask that it may be printed. Mr. Harris. I suppose that there are printed copies in the commit- tee room ? Mr. Ineatts. It can be printed without delay. Mr. Harris. I suppose so. I have no objection to the printing, but I should like, if the report goes over, that it be the understanding that we proceed with it early to-morrow morning. Mr. Ineatts. I have given that notice. Mr. Buatr. I hope it may be, as the Senator suggests, at the very earliest opportunity in the morning hour. aiid FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1303 Mr. Ineatts. I shall move the consideration of it at the close of the formal morning business, being allowed to do so under the usages and precedents and in accordance with the understanding of the Senate. The Prestipine Orricer. Without objection, the further considera-. tion of the conference report will be postponed until to-morrow morn- ing immediately after the morning business, and the report will be printed. : September 26, 1890—Senate. Conference report adopted. September 27, 1890. Be it enacted, etc., That a tract of land lying on both sides of Rock Creek, beginning at Klingle Ford Bridge and running northwardly, following the course of said creek, of a width not less at any point than 600 feet, nor more than 2,000 feet, including the bed of the creek, of which not less than 200 feet shall be on either side of said creek, south of Broad Branch road and Blagden Mill road and of such greater width north of said roads as the commissioners designated in this act may select, shall be secured, as hereinafter set out, and be perpetually dedicated and set apart as a public park or pleasure ground for the benefit and enjoyment of the people of the United States, to be known by the name of Rock Creek Park: Provided, however, That the whole tract so to be selected and condemned under the provisions of this act shall not exceed 2,000 acres nor the total cost thereof exceed the amount of money herein appropriated. Src. 2. That the Chief of Engineers of the United States Army, the Engineer Commissioner of the District of Columbia, and three citi- zens to be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, be, and they are hereby, created a commission to select the land for said park, of the quantity and within the limits aforesaid, and to havé the same surveyed by the assistant to the said _ Engineer Commissioner of the District of Columbia in charge of public highways, which said assistant shall also act as executive officer to the said commission. Sec. 3. That the said commission shall cause to be made an accurate map of said Rock Creek Park, showing the location, quantity, and character of each parcel of private property to be taken for such pur- pose, with the names of the respective owners inscribed thereon, which map shall be filed and recorded in the public records of the District of Columbia, and from and after the date of filing said map the several tracts and parcels of land embraced in said Rock Creek Park shall be held as condemned for public uses, and the title thereof vested in the United States, subject to the payment of just compensation, to be determined by said commission, and approved by the President of the United States: Provided, That such compensation be accepted by the owner or owners of the several parcels of land. 1304 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. That if the said commission shall be unable by agreement with the respective owners to purchase all of the land so selected and condemned within thirty days after such condemnation, at the price approved by the President of the United States, it shall, at the expiration of such period of thirty days, make application to the supreme court of the District of Columbia, by petition, at a general or special term, for an assessment of the value of such land as it has been unable to purchase. Said petition shall contain a particular description of the property selected and condemned, with the name of the owner or owners thereof, if known, and their residences, as far as the same may be ascertained, together with a copy of the recorded map of the park; and the said court is hereby authorized and required, upon such application, with- out delay, to notify the owners and occupants of the land, if known, by personal service, and if unknown, by service by publication, and to ascertain and assess the value of the land so selected and condemned by appointing three competent and disinterested commissioners to appraise the value or values thereof, and to return the appraisement to the court; and when the value or values of such land are thus ascer- tained, and the President of the United States shall decide the same to be reasonable, said value or values shall be paid to the owner or owners, and the United States shall be deemed to have a valid title to said land; and if in any case the owner or owners of any portion of said land shall refuse or neglect, after the appraisement of the cash value of said lands and improvements, to demand or receive the same from said court, upon depositing the appraised value in said court to the credit of such owner or owners, respectively, the fee simple shall in like manner be vested in the United States. Sec. 4. That said court may direct the time and manner in which possession of the property condemned shall be taken or delivered, and may, if necessary, enforce any order or issue any process for giving possession. Src. 5. That no delay in making an assessment of compensation, or in taking possession, shall be occasioned by any doubt which may arise as to the ownership of the property, or any part thereof, or as to the interests of the respective owners. In such cases the court shall require a deposit of the money allowed as compensation for the whole property or the part in dispute. In all cases as soon as the said commission shall have paid the compensation assessed, or secured its payment by a deposit of money under the order of the court, posses- sion of the property may be taken. All proceedings hereunder shall be in the name of the United States of America and managed by the commission. Src. 6. That the commission having ascertained the cost of the land, including expenses, shall assess such proportion of such cost and expenses upon the lands, lots, and blocks situated in the District of FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 13805 Columbia specially benefited by reason of the location and improve- ment of said park, as nearly as may be, in proportion to the benefits resulting to such real estate. If said commission shall find that the real estate in said District directly benefited by reason of the location of the park is not benefited to the full extent of the estimated cost and expenses, then they shall assess each tract or parcel of land specially benefited to the extent of such benefits as they shall deem the said real estate specially benefited. The commission shall give at least ten days’ notice, in one daily news- paper published in the city of Washington, of the time and place of their meeting for the purpose of making such assessment and may adjourn from time to time till the same be completed. In making the assessment the real estate benefited shall be assessed by the description as appears of record in the District on the day of the first meeting; but no error in description shall vitiate the assessment: Provided, That the premises are described with substantial accuracy. The commission shall estimate the value of the different parcels of real estate benefited as aforesaid and the amount assessed against each tract or parcel, and enter all in an assessment book. All persons interested may appear and be heard. When the assessment shall be completed it shall be signed by the commission or a majority (which majority shall have power always to act) and be filed in the office of the clerk of the supreme court of the District of Columbia. The commission shall apply to the court for a confirmation of said assessment, giving at least ten days’ notice of the time thereof by publication in one daily newspaper published in the city of Washington, which notice shall state in general terms the subject and the object of the application. The said court shall have power, after said notice shall have been duly given, to hear and determine all matters connected with said assessment; and may revise, correct, amend, and confirm said assess- ment, in whole or in part, or order a new assessment, in whole or in part, with or without further notice or on such notice as it shall pre- scribe; but no order for a new assessment in part, or any partial adverse action, shall hinder or delay confirmation of the residue, or col- lection of the assessment thereon. Confirmation of any part of the assessment shall make the same a lien on the real estate assessed. The assessment, when confirmed, shall be divided into four equal installments, and may be paid by any party interested in full or in one, two, three, and four years, on or before which times all shall be paya- ble, with 6 per centum annual interest on all deferred payments. All payments shall be made to the Treasurer of the United States, who shall keep the account as a separate fund. The orders of the court shall be conclusive evidence of the regularity of all previous proceed- ings necessary to the validity thereof, and of all matters recited in said orders. The clerk of said court shall keep a record of all proceedings 1306 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. in regard to said assessment and confirmation. The commission shall furnish the said clerk with a duplicate of its assessment book, and in both shall be entered any change made or ordered by the court as to any real estate. Such book filed with the clerk when completed and certified shall be prima facie evidence of all facts recited therein. In case assessments are not paid as aforesaid the book of assessments certified by the clerk of the court shall be delivered to the officer charged by law with the duty of collecting delinquent taxes in the Dis- trict of Columbia, who shall proceed to collect the same as delinquent real estate taxes are collected. No sale for any installment of assess- ment shall discharge the real estate from any subsequent installment; and proceedings for subsequent installments shall be as if no default had been made in prior ones. All money so collected may be paid by the Treasurer on the order of the commission to any persons entitled thereto as compensation for land or services. Such order on the Treasury shall be signed by a majority of the commission and shall specify fully the purpose for ~ which it is drawn. If the proceeds of assessment exceed the cost of the park the excess shall be used in its improvement, under the direc- tion of the officers named in section 8, if such excess shall not exceed the amount of $10,000. If it shall exceed that amount that part above $10,000 shall be refunded ratably. Public officers performing any duty hereunder shall be allowed such fees and compensation as they would be entitled to in like cases of collecting taxes. The civilian members of the commission shall be allowed $10 per day each for each day of actual service. Deeds made to purchasers at sales for delin- quent assessments hereunder shall be prima facie evidence of the right of the purchaser, and anyone claiming under him, that the real estate was subject to assessment and directly benefited, and that the assess- ment was regularly made; that the assessment was not paid; that due advertisement had been made; that the grantee in the deed was the purchaser or assignee of the purchaser, and that the sale was con- ducted legally. Any judgment for the sale of any real estate for unpaid assess- ments shall be conclusive evidence of its regularity and validity in all collateral proceedings except when the assessment was actually paid, and the judgment shall estop all persons from raising any objection ‘thereto, or to any sale or deed based thereon, which existed at the date of its rendition, and could have been presented as a defense-to the application for such judgment. To pay the expenses of inquiry, survey, assessment, cost of lands taken, and all other necessary expenses incidental thereto, the sum of $1,200,000, or so much thereof as may be necessary, is hereby appro- priated out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated: Provided, That one-half of said sum of $1,200,000, or so much thereof FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1307 as may be expended, shall be re-imbursed to the Treasury of the United States out of the revenues of the District of Columbia, in four equal annual installments, with interest at the rate of 3 per centum per annum upon the deferred payments: And provided further, That one- half of the sum which shall be annually appropriated and expended for the maintenance and improvement of said lands as a public park shall be charged against and paid out of the revenues of the District of Columbia, in the manner now provided by law in respect to other appropriations for the District of Columbia, and the other half shall be appropriated out of the Treasury of the United States. Sec. 7. That the public park authorized and established by this act shall be under the joint control of the Commissioners of the Dis- trict of Columbia and the Chief of Engineers of the United States Army, whose duty it shall be, as soon as practicable, to lay out and pre- pare roadways and bridle paths, to be used for driving and for horse- back riding, respectively, and footways for pedestrians; and whose duty it shall also be to make and publish such regulations as they deem neces- sary or proper for the care and management of the same. Such regu- lations shall provide for the preservation from injury or spoliation of all timber, animals, or curiosities within said park, and their retention in their natural condition, as nearly as possible. (Stat., XXX, 492.) STATUE OF CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS. Biccmbor 9, 1889—Senate. Mr. J. S. Morritx introduced joint resolution (S. 15): That the Secretary of the Navy, the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, and the Chief of Engineers, United States Army, be, and are hereby, authorized to con- tract for a statue in bronze of Christopher Columbus, to be erected on the circle at the western entrance to the Capitol grounds from Pennsylvania ayenue; and for this purpose, and for the entire expense of the foundation and pedestal of the monument, the sum of $50,000, or so much thereof as may be needed, is hereby appropriated, out of any moneys in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated: Provided, That the naval monument now standing upon the circle herein mentioned shall be removed and placed upon the triangular reservation bounded by Connecticut avenue, Twen- tieth street, and Q street; and any expense attending such removal shall be paid out . of the sum herein appropriated. Referred to Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds. NATIONAL MILITARY AND NAVAL MUSEUM. December 18, 1889—House. Mr. B. M. Curcueon introduced bill (H. 479) to establish a national mnilitary and naval museum in the city of Washington. Referred to Committee on Military Affairs. liy 23, 1890—House. © Reported by Mr. B. M. Cutcheon with amendment (Report H. 2084). Referred to Committee of the Whole. 1308 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BUILDING. December 19, 1889—Senate. Mr. H. M. TELLER (by request) introduced bill (S. 1553): That a fireproof building for the use and accommodation. of the United States Geological Survey shall be erected on the Government reservation between the National Museum and the Army Medical Museum, in the city of Washington, District of Columbia, and the said building shall be constructed on the plan submitted by the Director of the Geological Survey, with such modifications as shall be found necessary or advantageous without materially increasing the cost thereof; and the construction of said building shall be in charge of a commission composed of the Supervising Architect of the Treasury, the Architect of the Capitol, and the Director of the Geological Survey, who shall be empowered to make contracts for the con- struction thereof, after proper advertisements have been made, and to employ the necessary persons, and the money appropriated for said building shall be disbursed by the chief disbursing clerk of the Geological Survey. Src. 2. That the sum of $800,000 is hereby appropriated, out of any moneys in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the construction of said building; and the cost of said building shall not exceed said amount. Src. 3. That it shall be the duty of the said commission carefully to scrutinize the plan which may be deemed preferable, and to adopt it only on condition that the entire cost for the erection and completion of said building shall not exceed the amount specified in this act. Referred to Committee on Appropriations. January 6, 1890—House. Mr. Puitre 8. Posr introduced bill (H. 3827), same as 8S. 1553, December 19, 1896. Referred to Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds. March 22, 1890—House. Mr. Samurt Dresie, from Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds, submitted Report (H. 1007), to accompany bill (H. 3827). The Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds, to «which was referred the bill (H. 3827) for the erection of a public building for the use and accommodation of the United States Geological Survey upon the Government reservation in the city of Washington, D. C., has had the same under consideration, and recommends its passage. The United States Geological Survey is at present located in the Hooe Building, the Adams Building, the National Museum, and in nine cities in various parts of the Union. The force consists of 395 persons, now occupying 68,605 square feet of space. This space is entirely too limited for effective work, as anyone going through the Hooe Building will see at a glance that the employees of the Survey are crowded into small and inconvenient quarters. Estimates have been made of the cost of a fireproof building of six stories, with an area of 20,000 square feet on each floor, and the estimates have been submitted to the Supervising Architect of the Treasury, whose opinion fixes the cost at $800,000. FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1309 The needs of the Survey are of a peculiar nature, for laboratory space for chemistry, geology, paleontology, physics, and photography also for study rooms, where experts may enjoy the isolation necessary for undisturbed scientific labors, so that the requirements can only be met by the erection of a building specially designed to meet all the exigencies of the scientific work with which the Survey is charged by Congress. A proper administration demands that the Director should be able to have his entire force accommodated at Washington in one building, instead of having the members scattered in several buildings, and some in buildings in remote cities. The Government is now paying heavy rents for insufficient space, is encroaching on the space of the National Museum, now needed’ for museum purposes, and is dependent on the generosity of several col- leges for laboratory rooms necessary for carrying on the work of the Survey. Committed to Committee of the Whole. NATIONAL MUSEUM—EVENING OPENING. December 20, 1889—House. Mr. W. H. Crain introduced bill (H. 3341): That the National Museum and the Smithsonian Institution shall be kept open to the public from 10 antemeridian until 6 postmeridian during the months of Noyem- ber, December, January, February, and March, and from 11 antemeridian until 7 postmeridian during the remaining months of the year. Referred to Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds. March 1, 1890—House. Mr. W. H. Crain introduced bill (H. 7671): That the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution be, and are hereby, authorized to provide, as soon as possible, for the opening of the National Museum building and the museum halls in the Smithsonian Institution until sunset on every week day and until 10 postmeridian on at least two days in every week throughout the year; and the sum of $60,000, or such portion thereof as may be necessary, is hereby appropriated out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated to carry out the provisions of this act, said sum to be expended as follows: For an electric-light plant, with engines of at least 225 horsepower and a lighting capacity equivalent to at least 100 2,000-candlepower arc lights and 1,000 16-candle- power glow lights, $50,000, the same to be expended under the direction of the Sec- retary of the Smithsonian Institution, who is authorized to appoint a commission to select engines, dynamos, and other machinery, and to have wiring, construction of engine power, and other permanent work done by day labor if deemed by him desirable. For the maintenance of the lighting system during the last six months of the fiscal year of 1891, with necessary additional attendance, policing, and heating of the buildings, including all necessary services, $10,000. Referred to Committee on the Library. 1310 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. NATIONAL MUSEUM—ARMORY BUILDING. December 21, 1889—House. Mr. Louis E. McComas, from Committee on Appropriations, sub- mitted Report (H. 3) to accompany bill (H. 3711): [Extract.] HEADQUARTERS MILITIA OF THE DistTRICT oF COLUMBIA, Washington, D. C., December 16, 1889. Sir: The appropriations estimated for the District militia are for expenses author- ized by the act of March 1, 1889. The largest item is for rent of armories, and is not only required by law, but justified by previous equities. Under an appropriation made in 1855 a.building known as the Armory was erected on the Mall, and dedicated by law to the use of the District militia. In 1876 the building was unoccupied, the District militia not having been reorganized after the war, and the building was availed of to store the foreign exhibits from the Centennial Exhibition presented to our Government, and under that authority was used by the Smithsonian Institution, National Museum, and Fish Commission until 1885, after which time they continued in possession of it without any specific authority. In 1887, the District militia having been reorganized, the Secretary of War made a demand upon the parties in possession to surrender the building to him, as its cus- todian under the law, for its legitimate uses. The matter was subsequently brought to the attention of the Senate Committee on Appropriations by a request from the Secretary of War either that the Fish Commission be provided with quarters else- where, or that provision be made for the District militia elsewhere (S. Report 1814, first session, Fiftieth Congress). It being deemed inexpedient to remove the Fish Commission, a clause was inserted in the sundry civil appropriation bill to transfer the building to them, and subsequently an appropriation was reported and passed by the Senate to enable the Secretary of War to rent armories for the District militia elsewhere. This appropriation was dropped in conference between the two Houses. on account of the passage of the bill specifically providing by law for such armories to be rented. The only other items requiring special notice are those for the cost of the annual camp of instruction, and the majority of those items are for permanent necessities and comparatively few for current expenses. It is proper to observe that in most of the States the militia are paid for all time served on duty in camps of instruction, but that the District militia do their work and submit to instruction without pay, the appropriations being solely for actual expenses incurred. Under the act of March 1 the militia of the District has been thoroughly reorgan- ized and completely equipped and uniformed, and consists of eight battalions of infantry, one separate company, one battery of light artillery, one signal company, and one ambulance company, having an aggregate strength of about 2,000 men. Respectfully, yours, ALBERT ORDWAY, Brigadier-General, District of Columbia Militia. Hon. L. E. McComas, Chairman Sabcommittee on District Appropriation Bill, January 12, 1891—House. Deficiency estimates for 1891. For raising the walls, providing a new roof, and fitting up the interior of the third and attic stories of the Armory building on the Mall, city of Washington, for offices, files, and storage rooms, and FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1311 their equipment, and for the enlargement and extension of the heating and water apparatus, and the purchase of all necessay gas fixtures, $12,000. And the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution is hereby required to remove the workshops under his direction, now in the third story of said Armory building, to other buildings under his con- trol, and the whole of said Armory building shall hereafter be under the care and custody of the United States Commissioner of Fish and Fisheries. Norr.—See appropriation December 21, 1893, in Fifty-third Congress, second session. NATIONAL MUSEUM—NEW BUILDING. February 19, 1890—Senate. Mr. Justin S. Morriti, from Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds, reported a bill (S. 2740): That for an additional fireproof building for the use of the National Museum, 300 feet square, with two stories and a basement, to be erected under the direction of the Architect of the Capitol, with the approval of the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in accordance with plans now on file with the Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds, on the southwestern portion of the grounds of the Smith- sonian Institution, there shall be appropriated, out of any moneys in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, the sum of $500,000; said building to be placed west of the Smithsonian Institution, leaving a roadway between it and the latter of not less than 50 feet, with its north front on a line with the south face of the Agricultural Department and of the Smithsonian Institution, and constructed as far as practicable, after proper advertisement, by contract or contracts, awarded to the lowest responsi- ble bidder, and all expenditures for the purposes herein mentioned shall be audited by the proper officers of the Treasury Department. March 29, 1890—Senate. Mr. J. S. Morrimu. I ask the Senate to take up order of business 461, being the bill (S. 2740). ae F. M. Cockrett. I hope the Senator will not do that. That is out of order and in violation of our understanding that we should pro- ceed regularly with the Calendar. Mr. Morrit.. I should be very glad to have the bill acted on. Mr. Cockreu. I am in favor of the bill and should like to see it pass. March 31, 1890—Senate. Mr. J. S. Morrii, from Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds, presented a letter of the Secretary of the Smithsonian Insti- tution: SMITHSONIAN InstiTuTION, U. S. Natronat Museum, Washington, January 21, 1890. Str: I send you herewith a set of sketch plans intended to show, in a general way, the extent and character of a building such as would seem to be necessary for the accommodation of the Museum collections in the present and immediate future, and respectfully request for them your attention and a recommendation to Congress of the necessary means for such a building. 1312 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. These plans and sketches are provisional, but although not presented in detail they represent the results of studies, extending over many years, of the plans of the best modern museum buildings in Europe and America, nearly all of which have been inspected by officers of the Smithsonian Institution. The proposed building covers the same area as that finished in 1881. It isintended to consist of two stories and a basement, except in the central portion, which consists of one lofty hall open from the main floor to the roof, the height of which will be 90 feet, galleries being placed on the level of the second floor in other parts of the building. Its interior arrangements are, as you will see, different from those in the actual Museum, all the changes having been planned in the light of the experience of nine years’ occupation of the present building. It will afford between two and three times as much available space for exhibition and storage under the same area of roof. The fifteen exhibition halls are completely isolated from each other, and may readily be subdivided, when necessary, into smaller rooms. The light will be as good as in the old building, and the ventilation perhaps still better. The sanitary arrangements have been carefully considered. The necessity for a basement is especially great. In this, place has been provided for many storage rooms and workshops. The existence of a basement will promote the comfort and health of visitors and employees, and by increasing the dryness of the air in the exhibition halls will secure the better preservation of the collections. These proposed changes in the internal arrangements will not interfere with con- formity with the other points of the present Museum building in the essential features of exterior proportion. The total capacity of this present building in avail- able floor space is about 100,000 square feet; that of the new building somewhat exceeds 200,000. The present Museum building contains about 80,000 feet of floor space available for exhibition. That proposed will contain about 103,300 square feet for exhibition. The space devoted to offices and laboratories would not be much more, but the area available for exhibition halls, storage rooms, and workshops far greater. Theappropriation for the construction of the present building was $250,000. This sum was supplemented by several special appropriations: $25,000 for steam- heating apparatus; $26,000 for marble floors; $12,500 for water and gas fixtures and electrical apparatus, and $1,900 for special sewer connections, so that the total cost was $315,400. The structure was probably completed for a smaller sum of money than any other similar one of equal capacity in the world, and at an expense relative to capacity which the present prices of material make it certain can not be repeated. The estimates of cost on this building vary greatly with regard to details of con- struction on which I do not here enter further than to say that the whole should be absolutely fireproof throughout, and in view of the further great variation of the cost of building materials within the past two years I am not prepared to state the sum which would be necessary for its completion. It is certain, however, that $500,000, if not sufficient to complete it, would be all that would be required to be expended during the present year, and I would respectfully represent the desirability of an appropriation of this amount for the purpose in question. Your attention is directed to certain facts in regard to the character of the mate- rials for the accommodation of which this building is desired. The collections of the Smithsonian Institution and of the Government are especially rich in collections of natural history, which may be grouped in three general classes: The zoological collections, the botanical collections, and the geological collections, including not only all the geological and mineralogical material, but the greater portion of that belonging to paleontology, the study of fossil animals and plants forming an essential part of modern geological work. Besides the natural history collections, there are equally important anthropological collections which illustrate the history of mankind at all periods and in every land, and which serve to explain the development of all human arts and industries. In FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1313 - everything that relates to the primitive inhabitants of North America, Eskimo as . well as Indian, these collections are by far the richest in the world, and with the necessary amount of exhibition space the material on hand will be arranged in a manner which will produce the most impressive and magnificent effect, the educa- - _ tional importance of which can not be overestimated. Again there are collections of considerable extent which illustrate the processes and products of the various arts and industries, as well as what are termed the historical collections, which are of especial interest to a very large number of the visitors to the Museum on account of the associations of the objects exhibited with the personal history of representative -men, or with important events in the history of America. The collections illustrating the arts and the art industries are relatively small, and, although in themselves of great interest and value, not to be compared in importance with those in natural history.and ethnology. In a letter addressed on June 7, 1888, to the Hon. Justin 8. Morrill, and which will be found in a report of June 12 of the same year from the Senate Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds, I made a statement of the rapidity of the recent growth of the Museum, mentioning that in the five years from 1882 to 1887 the number of speci- mens in the collection have multiplied no less than sixteen times, and endeavored to give an idea, though perhaps an inadequate one, of the extent to which the pressure for want of space was felt. The evil has grown rapidly worse, and, as I have had occasion to mention, it has been felt in the last year in a partial arrest of the growth of the collections, which emphasizes the demand for more room. The present Museum building is not large enough even for the natural history collections alone, a number of which are without any exhibition space whatever. The proposed building will afford accommodations for the ethnological and technological material already on hand, and for a large part of the natural history material also. The collections are still increasing, and the number of specimens, as estimated, is now not far from 3,000,000. The appended table (A) shows the annual increase since 1882. The increase during the last year was comparatively small. This may be accounted for by the fact that our exhibition halls and storage rooms being filled to their utmost capacity, it has. seemed necessary to cease in a large degree the cus- tomary efforts for the increase of the Museum. Unless more space is soon provided the development of the Government collections will of necessity be almost completely arrested. So long as there was room for storage, collections not immediately required could. be received and packed away for future use. This can not longer be done. The Armory building, since 1877 assigned to the Museum for storage and work- shops, is now entirely occupied by the U.S. Fish Commission, with the exception of four rooms, and by some of the Museum taxidermists, who are now working in yery contracted space, and whom it is impossible to accommodate elsewhere. _ Increased space in the exhibition halls is needed, the educational value of the collec- tions being seriously diminished by the present crowded system of installation. Still more necessary, however, is room for storage, for rearranging the great reserve col-, lections, for eliminating duplicate material for distribution to college and school museums, and for the use of the taxidermists and preparators engaged in preparing objects for exhibition. Space is also required for the proper handling of the costly outfit of the museum cases and appliances for installation, of which there is always a considerable amount temporarily out of use or in process of construction. The appended table (B) shows the amount of floor space now assigned to the various collections and the amount required for the proper display of material already in hand, making a reasonable allowance for the expansion during the three years which would probably pass before a new building could be completed and proyided with necessary cases. H. Doc. 732——83 13i4r CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. The appended table (C) shows the number of feet of floor space (the average height being 10 feet) required for laboratories, workshops, and for the several depart- ments. This is in addition to storage space under the cases in the exhibition halls, and a considerable portion may be in cellars and attics. ° In summarizing what has just been said, it may be stated in general terms that the © amount of space already required for exhibition purposes alone, being (Table B) 207,500 feet as against 100,675 now occupied, and this being exclusive of the (Table C) 108,900 square feet needed for other objects, the accumulations have now reached such a point of congestion that the actual space needs to be doubled, even independ- ently of future increase; and I beg to repeat that, unless more space is provided, the _ development of the Government collection, which is already partly arrested, will be almost completely stopped. ; ' Your obedient servant, S. P. Laneuey, Secretary. Hon. LELAND STANFORD, Chairman Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds, United States Senate. TABLE A.—Annual increase in the collections. Department. 1882. | 1883. 1884. 1885-86. 1886-87. | 1887-88. | 1888-89. NATURAL HISTORY Zoology itanrniale 220 Pee 4, 660 4, 920 5, 694 7,451 7,811 8, 058 8,275 Birds). SAA RAS 44, 354 47, 246 50, 350 55, 945 54, 987 56, 484 57, 974 Birds Gees (se ee SASL Lae ee 40, 072 44,163 | a48,173 50, 055 50, 173 Reptiles and batrachians..|........-.|...---.--- 23, 495 25, 344 27, 542 27, 664 28, 405 MisheR acces ad-§ acecyeore xen 50, 000 65, 000 68, 000 75,000 | 100,000 | 101,350 107, 350 Mol risks isp ts 22 kop oman Sect 1 Sy 5 ee 400,000 | ¢460,000 | 425, 000 4 455, 000 468, 000 Marine invertebrates cs (other than mollusks) ..| 011,781 | b 14,825 |@200,000 |d@350,000 | @450,000 | 515, 000 515, 300 12 2 te Spall pa hae CWO ee €151,000 | 500,000 |@585,000 | 595,000 | 603, 000 Comparative anatomy..... 3,605 | ~ 8,742 7,214 | 10,210} @11,022] 11,558 11, 758 PAVING AUIS. oso oocs cell oeace os ce] eck soc b eee] acne ceeee lee saws ses leeeteee ase 220 491 Botany: oi} Retent plante fy, Cc SsS eee Os. ee ieo eS cee ae 30,000 | @32,000 38, 000 38, 459 Paleontology: Invertebrate— Paleozoic..-.8s.d3tcnt cles toe oe 20,000} 73,000} 80,482] 84,491] 84,649 91, 126 Wenge Mt 5950. .s a cede nat eee woe 100, 000 69, 742 70,775 70, 925 71, 236 Cenozoic (included with . MOMUSES) sonics sna onee| semen ee ss|annesgusce ec aedns seal s~cpab eed -saoec cea | oe eee ees ae PIGS: cece cree caw eesees|eaereeeers 4,624 S7, 291 S7, 429 8, 462 10, 000 10,178 Geology: Minerals’ 2 vas. ROMS ' 14,550 | 16,610] 18, 401 18,601 | 21,896 27, 690 Wdthioligny ys C24 sss. Sto k9,075 | 12,500} 18,000} 20,647] 421,500] 22,500 27,000 Metallurgy ~ .222 ease scbe)iee a tess 30, 000 40, 000 48,000 | 449,000 51, 412 52, 076 ANTHROPOLOGY. Prehistoric archeology........ 35, 512 40, 491 45, 252 65,314 | 101,659 | 108,631 116, 472 Ethnology) -.< <3. -tecesccncs|sseos ee lee |secek cases 200,000 |@500,000 | 503,764 | 505, 464 506, 324 American aboriginal pottery..):.........|...--.---- 12, 000 25,000 | d 26,022 27,122 28, 222 Oriental antiquities. 6. 350.20} ese Re ae es Se io A eee 850 2,235 are nests. 3 b Catalogue entries. cIncluding Cenozoic fossils. d ¥stimated. eProfessor Riley’s collection numbers 150,000 specimens. f Exclusive of Professor Ward’s collection, g No entries of material received during the year have been made on catalogue. h Duplicates not included, Department. ARTS AND INDUSTRIES. Animal products Naval architecture .......-.... Historical relics Coins, medals, paper money, Modern pottery, and bronzes Paints and dyes porcelain, 1882, Musical instruments ..........|.......008 i ed Sees FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. TasBLeE A.—Annual increase in the collections—Continued. “The Catlin Gallery” Physical apparatus 13815 ° a aI i I h Duplicates not included. Department. NATURAIJ HISTORY. Zoology: memsnirinie..--.-.-..--.--. Reptiles and batrachians. Fishes and fisheries. ...... ' DRG T ING! SS jae ip i oe Marine invertebrates (other than mollusks)... Insects Comparative anatomy.... Botany: Systematic and economic (ineluding forestry)... Paleontology: ; Invertebrate (including Paleozoic, Mesozoic, -and Cenozoic) wee ee ene ee ce we eee ee SUITS. Gua ee a eR ae Boece eee ee oe aie tIncluding paints, pignients, and oils. N. B.—No estimate of increase ef collection taken in 1885. TaBLE B.—Exhibition space. Floor space now oc- cupied. Sq. feet. 6,500 6, 000 1, 000 7, 600 3, 500 3, 000 1, 600 « 4,500 Amount required. Department. NATURAL HISTORY—cont’d. Sq. feel. || Paleontology—continued. 12, 000 VGrbeGDIMLG.- occ ne esos 14, 000 Mineralogy and geology. . 3, 000 ANTHROPOLOGY. 14, 000 ; , 5, 000 Prehistoric archzology...--- General ethnology..-.-..--.-.-- 5,500 au and industries ....-.-..- 4, 000 HIStory) caacuew ace sminccie esters 10, 000 heeture hall 2ecJ 3 ck . Sees Pots: Sescstecetssstaces 4,000 7,500 Floor space now oc- cupied. Sq. feet. 1,500 12, 000 10, 000 10, 400 22, 000 3, 000 4,575 100, 675 1883, 1884. 1885-86. | 1886-87. | 1887-88. | 1888-89. 4, 000 4, 442 4, 850 5, 516 5, 762 5, 942 71, 244 1,580 h822 j877 9 877 911 4 i. EERE 2, 000 3, 064 3,144] 3,144 3, 222 -|eese--+---| 5,000} 49,870] 10,078 | g10,078 | g10,078 ated... | 1,000 2,792 2,822 | 2,822 2, 948 pennihc.. ) DISA, Ce EL IAD 600 el a ee 1, 002 13, 634 14, 640 g 14, 640 Neier a. se}. ARS 2a! 1, 055 pists tales |p tee a's) 400 417 427 b 427 pseu ee! 2,278 2, 238 3, 011 g3, 011 os eet 77 100 g 100 109 Eaiseineiseelecs secs see 500 500 500 g 500 250 251 g 251 g 251 h197 198 g 198 213 h659 661 g 661 688 263,143 |1, 472, 600 |2, 420, 944 |2, 666,335 |2, 803, 459 | 2, 863, 894 j Foods only. kIn reserve series. Amount required. Sq. Seet. 10, 000 17,000 10, 000 40, 000 40, 000 5, 000 6, 500 207, 500 ‘1316 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. TABLE C.—Storage, workshops, offices, laboratories, etc. Square Department. 8 a Department. at! NATURAL HISTORY. NATURAL HISTORY—continued. Zoology: Geology: f Mammals... .20bidie cece cteete noes 3, 000 Mineralogy and geology (including |. Birds 26 SRE is bes 8. coe aete ee ese 4,000 WODKS RODS) om emcmamemseeiodagaeaae 4,000 Reptiles and batrachians....-....-.--. 2,500 ||} Anthropology: rs Wishes Ssse0 i830 sea ebro ees 5, 000 Prehistoric archeology. ..---......-.- 2,000 (IMolMENkS tk ss bee eee 4,000 General ethnology. .....-.---..........- 6, 000 Marine invertebrates (other than Arts andindustries (several divisions)| 15,000 mollusks) 5 See OPN eee Scns 4,000 | Taxidermists, osteologists, modelers, IMSCCIBe oF. wcicn cc scree ce nse seat eee ses 2,400 PLCPALALOIS se. ae egeeke en eer pees See oei|. « £0000 ‘Comparative anatomy...........----- 3,000)! Mechanics << <5 <.

sawtaene ce eenlcaee nnn aie See 13. 360 40, 000. 00 Mrs Ganev et cet ae aw ches Sten as coma de ietemes ne ae 1. 440 | 3, 000. 00 Mirah: an eae lee Se 58° 2eo Ser e he ee Uo te eee . 392 | 170.76 Motel Ae Ol ee gee eck ete ot Neglet, ae a eb he ee 131, 145 158, 356.76 List of property which must be acquired by condemnation. Valuation of- fered by com- Owner. Acres. mission and approved by President. PARCINCUBIORG 32225 de: Sus Ss deans fo ee. RE bee are Sn 24. 570 $9, 828. 00 JP Riinple-o5 6 .tht 3s oe ce B aijee Pog knees so ehineeeeeie- pames sae eee ~ 6.180 4, 994. 00 Part‘colored Gemeétery): = ..<'=- 33 jets > Pace kn ashes sere eeeeperte saaerineeeee = 1.700 3, 000. 00 Ey Ee Biay@en 205. o eee ioe 25 see eae sane ORO eee eee . 670 800. 00 McPherson a Winlkeyes. ste ic. 0 teolupes se tan Peete sea te eer eset eee eee. .315 200. 00 33. 435 18, 772. 00 Quarry Troad)(public property)... .i0.sccscecsh- 2. seeeeeekecee aweehne cesianien FAG |p S52 teeters Section in stream bed of unclaimed ownership ..........--.-----------++- 1 O60} era as samenrese ae Total. .2... ....- Se eee. Le Se eee Ce eee eae T5906 {)sc-0c 22 eee Grand total ... 02.2.5 5008 5 o0sees osu caes Se bee ee ee 166, 486 177, 128. 76 The commission calls attention to the fact that the accuracy of the estimates of the probable cost of this land, submitted by the Smithsonian Institution to the appro- priation committees of both Houses of Congress, and repeatedly referred to in debate, has been verified by the cost of the purchases made up to date. Of the site of 121 . 5 ; ae ~ Klingle ae Oe J.P. Klingle. 6.18Acres Miss A.E.J.Evans. 94.05 Acres 13.36 Acres ‘ss 98 303 Lig ROAD af 13 men gee a Union 52 —~ Benevolent — Association y S (Colored), S MAP OF THE NATIONAL ZOOLOGICAL PARK AS SURVEYED AND PLATTED BY C2 RS THE U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, AND RECORDED BY THE ZOOLOGICAL PARK COMMISSION, NOVEMBER 2i, 1889. Scale: 1 inch = 300 feet Area: 10048 sores of the Commission. Redrawn and engraved to accompany the report ¢ FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 13837 acres that was originally marked out on the maps and models submitted to Congress, 90 acres have now been purchased by agreement. The estimate to Congress of the cost of these 90 acres, taken separately, was $109,750, whereas the actual cost of this ground, by agreement, is $104,316. The plans herewith submitted show— (1) The relative area and location of the park, on a general map of the city and suburbs. (2) The actual metes and bounds with the names of the original owners, on a copy of the map described in the act. Judging from the progress thus far, it now seems probable that the land remaining to be acquired by condemnation and appraisement proceedings will cost the Gov- ernment a sum not widely differing from the commission’s valuation; and if this should prove to be the case, after allowing for incidental expenses, the total cost of the entire site will fall so far within the $200,000 appropriated, even after the purchase of about 45 acres beyond the originally contemplated area, as to leave a balance, ’ which may be applied to necessary preliminary expenses. Before the expiration of the present fiscal year the Zoological Park Commission will have completed the duties with which it was charged by the act of Congress which called it into existence, and the title to the lands it has purchased will be vested in the United States. Pending the completion of the condemnation proceedings now in progress and the submission of a final report, it is extremely desirable that Con- gress should enact further legislation in regard to the park. The commission has no authority to put up fences and lay out roads or grounds, or to erect buildings, nor is it even certain that it has the right to accept donations. The park is declared by Congress to be ‘‘ for the advancement of science and the instruction and recreation of the people.’’ In the construction of ponds and lakes, and the erection of inclosures and buildings for the purposes of zoological science, a stage will soon be reached where scientific direction seems obviously desirable; and it is respectfully represented to Congress that any means for laying out and improving the grounds can be most advantageously used in view of the purpose of Congress as to the ultimate disposi- tion of the park now when the foundations of its future usefulness are being laid.’ If the very considerable collection of living animals now in the custody of the Smith- sonian Institution is to form the nucleus of the zoological park collection, its transfer should be effected by legislative enactment and suitable measures taken for its main- tenance. The commission is of the opinion that the collection referred to should, with the consent of the Regents of the Institution, be transferred to the zoological park as soon as possible after the Government takes full possession of the site. Joun W. Nostez, Secretary of the Interior, J. W. Douauass, Prest. Board Com. Dis. Col., S. P. LANGLEY, Secretary Smithsonian Institution, Commissioners for the Establishment of a Zoological Park in the District of Columbia. 1 (Congressional Record, March 1, 1889, p. 2662.) Mr. BreckinripGe. I append the report of the Committee on Public Grounds that the record may show the exact object in view. There is absolute protection from jobbery in the fact that this is to be under the supervision of the Smithsonian Institution. (P. 2663.) Mr. Drssie. We are proud of the Smithsonian, and the Smithsonian has already, by gift, not by purchase, the nucleus of a collection, * * * andIam informed by the Secretary of the Smithsonian that this place furnishes the right kind of location * * * forthe propagation and perpetuation of these rapidly disap- pearing species of American animals, while at the same time it will serve the pur- poses of a public park. 1338 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. ExnHisit A. OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONERS OF THE ZOOLOGICAL PARK, SMITHSONIAN InstITUTION, Washington, D. C., April 15, 1889. Sr: In accordance with an act of Congress approved March 2, 1889 (Public, No. 113), for the establishment of a zoological park in the District of Columbia, the com- missioners created by this act, and charged with the duty of its fulfillment, give notice that they have been ‘‘authorized and directed to make an inspection of the country along Rock Creek, between Massachusetts avenue extended and where said creek is crossed by the road leading west from Brightwood (commonly known as the Military road), and to select from that district of country such a tract of land, of not less than 100 acres, which shall include a section of the creek, as said commission shall deem to be suitable and appropriate for a zoological park.’’ They further give notice that the act declares: ‘‘That the said commission shall cause to be made a careful map of said zoological park, showing the location, quantity, and character of each parcel of private property to be taken for such purpose, with the names of the respective owners inscribed thereon, and the said map shall be filed and recorded in the public records of the District of Columbia; and from and after that date the several tracts and parcels of land embraced in such zoological park shall be held as condemned for public uses, subject to the payment of just compensation, to be determined by the said commis- sion and approved by the President of the United States, provided that such com- pensation be accepted by the owner or owners of the several parcels of land. ‘‘That if the said commission shall be unable to purchase any portion of the land so selected and condemned within thirty days after such condemnation, by agree- ment with the respective owners, at the price approved by the President of the United States, it shall, at the expiration of such period of thirty days, make application to the supreme court of the District of Columbia, by petition, at a general or special term, for an assessment of the value of such land, and said petition shall contain a particular description of the property selected and condemned, with the name of the owner or owners thereof, and his, her, or their residences, as far as the same may be ascertained, together with a copy of the recorded map of the park; and the said court is hereby authorized and required, upon such application, without delay, to notify the owners and occupants of the land and to ascertain and assess the value of the land so selected and condemned by appointing three commissioners to appraise the value or values thereof, and to return the appraisement to the court; and when the values of such land are thus ascertained, and the President shall deem the same reasonable, said values shall be paid to the owner or owners, and: the United States shall be deemed to have a valid title to said lands.”’ In view of the desirability, in selecting said site, of taking into account the value of the various parcels of land which the commission has the power to include, the commissioners hereby invite you, as an owner of property in the region indicated, to furnish them not later than May 1, 1889, with a written statement of the lowest price at which you will agree to sell, for the purpose named above, the following-described real estate, which they understand is owned by you, viz: There is open for inspection in this office, between the hours of 2 and 4p. m., a map showing the Rock Creek region, on which are laid down the names of real estate holders, and the bounds and contents of their properties, so far as these are known. to the commissioners. JoHN W. Nos ez, Secretary of the Interior, Wiu1am B. Wess, Pres. Board Com. Dis. Col., S. P. LANGLEy, Secretary Smithsonian Institution, ? Commissioners. Referred to Committee on Appropriations. — FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1339 ! January 20, 1890—Senate. - The Vicre-Preswwent (Mr. Levi P. Morton) laid before the Senate a communication from the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution and Zoological Park Commission, transmitting a report of the com- mission for the establishment of a zoological park in the District of Columbia. Referred to Committee on the District of Columbia. (Same as in House January 18, 1890.) January 20, 1890—HdHouse. Mr. JoserpH WHEELER submitted concurrent resolution: That there be printed of the report of the Zoological Park Commission and its accompanying maps 1,000 extra copies, of which 200 copies shall be for the use of the Senate, 500 copies for the use of the House of Representatives, and 300 copies for the use of the Zoological Park Commission. Referred to Committee on Printing. February 7, 1890—House. Passed. March 24, 1890—Senaie, Passed. May 12, 1890—Senate. Mr. R. F. Prerrigrew submitted a resolution: Resolved, That the Secretary of the Interior is hereby directed to inform the Senate whether commissioners have been appointed to appraise the land authorized to be condemned for a zoological park in the District of Columbia; if so, their names and the salaries of each, with the amounts paid to each, and what services they, or either of them, have performed. Also, if an attorney has been appointed as legal adviser to said commissioners; if so, his name, salary, the length of time for which he -is appointed, what services he has rendered and the amount paid to him on account ‘of such services, and under what authority he was appointed. Also, whether either of said commissioners or the attorney has any interest in real estate in the neigh- borhood of said proposed park; and whether the Attorney-General has caused the titles to said land to be examined. Agreed to. May 21, 1890—Senate. Letter from the Secretary of the Interior transmitting information in regard to the condemnation of land for a zoological park in the Dis- trict of Columbia. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Washingjon, May 19, 1890. Srr: I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of the resolution of the Senate of the United States dated May 12, 1890, whereby the Secretary of the Interior is “directed to inform the Senate whether commissioners have been appointed to appraise the land authorized to be condemned for a zoological park in the District of Columbia; if so, their names and the salaries of each, with the amounts paid to each, and what services they, or either of them, have performed. Also, if an attor- ney has been appointed as legal adviser to said commissioners; if so, his name, sal- ary, the length of time for which he is appointed, what services he has rendered and the amount paid to him on account of such services, and under what authority 13840 CONGRESSIONAL “PROCEEDINGS. he was appointed. Also, whether either of said commissioners, or the attorney, has any interest in real estate in the neighborhood of said proposed park; and whether the Attorney-General has caused the titles to said land to be examined.”’ By reference to the United States Statutes at Large (vol. 25, p. 808), it will be found that in order to establish the zoological park referred to in the resolution a commission was constituted, composed of three persons, namely, the Secretary of the Interior, the president of the Board of Commissioners of the District of Colum- bia, and the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, and which was to be known and designated as ‘‘The commission for the establishment of a zoological park.’’ It will therefore be seen that the commission thus established has no relation to the Department of the Interior, and that the Secretary of the Interior is merely ex officio president of an independent board established by statute. This board, in pursuance of the authority given it, proceeded personally on several occasions during the last summer to examine the country along Rock Creek described in the law, made appraisements, prepared a map of all that region they deemed best for the park, and filed the same; whereupon, by force of the statute named, all of the tracts therein contained were condemned to the use of the United States for the purposes expressed, but subject to the payment of just compensation, to be deter- mined by the said commission and approved by the President of the United States, provided that such compensation was accepted by the owner or owners of the sey- eral parcels of land. Such just compensation was determined upon by the commis- sion and submitted to the President of the United States, who approved the same, and compensation was accepted by the owners of most of the land described in the map. A few, however, refused to accept the amount assessed; whereupon, under the provisions of the law, the commission, being unable to purchase the same by agreement within thirty days after the filing of the map and consequent condemna- tion, made application to the supreme court of the District of Columbia, by petition, for an assessment of the value, in accordance with the statute, of such land yet unpurchased. Thereupon the court became authorized and required, without delay, to notify the owners and occupants of such land and to ascertain and assess the value thereof, by appointing three commissioners to appraise the value or values thereof, and to return the appraisement to the court. These are the commissioners about whom the resolution of the Senate makes inquiry. “ The court proceeded under the law and appointed as commissioners to appraise the values of the several tracts, the owners whereof would not agree to sell, Messrs. Henry A. Willard, B. D. Carpenter, and E. E. White. Mr. Willard declined to act, | and on the 18th of February Mr. Samuel E. Wheatley was appointed in his place. The commissioners appointed by the court dre the officers of the court, and their compensation will be such as the court may determine to pay them. The Secretary of the Interior as president of the commission, or the commission itself, has nothing to do therewith, as plainly appears from the statute and as is known from the com- mon practice in such cases. The services of these commissioners appointed to appraise this land are under the direction of the court, and what they have per- formed appears in the records of the court, which are not within the control of the Secretary of the Interior. The Secretary of the Interior is not informed whether an attorney has been appointed as legal adviser to said commissioners, but inasmuch as these officers of the court can at any time apply for direction or advice to the court itself, it is highly improbable that any attorney has been appointed for them. It is believed that no such attorney has been appointed, and consequently that no salary is to be paid him. Whether either of the commissioners appointed as above mentioned, or their attorney, if their be such, has any interest in real estate in the neighborhood of such proposed park the Secretary of the Interior is unable to inform the Senate; but FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1341 such commissioners having been appointed by a court of record at the seat of Gov-’ ernment, it is presumed that all the ordinary precautions were taken to avoid the appointment of those who, by reason of their interest, would not be proper persons to make the assessments. The legal proceedings in the court for condemnation are being conducted by the United States attorney for the District’of Columbia and an assistant, Mr. Webb, appointed by the Attorney-General at the request of the commission. The Attorney-General has caused the titles to so much land as has been purchased to be examined, and is engaged in still examining the titles to those parts concerning which agreements have been made and upon which payments will be made as fast as the titles are favorably reported upon. No.money has been paid by the commission upon any purchase except where the Attorney-General has thus reported upon the title. The above report answers, it is believed, all of the inquiries made by the resolu- tion, directly and positively, but owing to the peculiar nature of the resolution and the matters therein inquired of, as if there might be something wrong, the Secretary begs leave further to say in reply thereto that a report was made by the commission to this Congress in full, concerning all the matters transacted by the commission from its organization to the date of the report, January 17,1890. This report will be found in extenso, in the House Misc. Doc. No. 72 (a copy of which is herewith transmitted), and it thereby appears that there has been procured by purchase a little over 131 acres of land, and that by proceedings in condemnation, or as public or unclaimed land, about 35 acres additional will be acquired, making in all about 1663 acres; that the price agreed upon by purchase is stated to be $158,356.76.. The valuation offered by the commission and approved by the President for the land to be acquired by condemnation is stated at $18,772, making a total probable cost of the whole, $177,128.76. The act under which the commission was formed appropriated $200,000 and author- ized the purchase of not less than 100 acres. The purchase of 1664 acres, therefore, at $177,128.76 shows that the commission has performed its duties so carefully and efficiently as to come far within the limits*prescribed by the bill both as to amount of land and price. It may be said also that the lands were purchased at most reasonable prices. It is to be further observed that when the commissioners appointed by the court to appraise the values of the land condemned under legal proceedings make their award, and the same is approved by the court, it is necessary still further that the President shall express his opinion that such values are reasonable before the sums assessed shall be paid to the owners. Most respectfully, Joun W. Noste, Secretary. THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE. Referred to Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds. January 21, 1891—House. Letter from the Secretary of the Commission. SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, Washington, D. C., January 19, 1891. Str: I am instructed by the commission for the establishment of a zoological park in the District of Columbia to present this its final report. The report, signed in duplicate, I have the honor to inclose to you. : Very respectfully, yours, S. P. LANGLEY, Secretary Smithsonian Institution and Secretary Zoological Park Commission. THE SPEAKER OF THE House or REPRESENTATIVES. ‘ 1342 - CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. REPORT OF COMMISSION. January 19, 1891. To the Senate and House of Representatives in Congress assembled: The commission for the establishment of a zoological park has the honor to state that the purchase of the 166.48 acres of land mentioned in its report to Congress of January 16, 1890, has been completed by the condemnation of certain lands, at prices which have been approved by the President, as follows: cia Condemna- umber | tion price a Owner. of acres. |proved by the President. Pacilone One. nos. oee eet. tee Ree ee ae et eae. We 24.570 | a$16, 696.73 JP SKdinelen ees eee eee eee ee ee eee ee Oe 6.180 9, 270. 00 Pent OF COMECUCEN: © ot ae sans oe crests soe cen 5 os Meera Ee Oot c= sree ae eee 1.700 3, 000. 00 Dig) igs BEA C0 ha) tes al Se he Aa RE as SR eS. eee . 670 1, 897. 00 IMePHersome Hinkey 2 252 2sc okt obsess tals Joe see tee eet ee das ee ae ee a as 815 1, 372.00 JE MER vand 2¢ 23622 SAPO Se EET EN FEE Re LR eee gee b 1.060 233.10 32, 468. 83 aThe actual condemnation price was $16,836.48, but the Government has deducted $139.75 on account of unpaid taxes. b At the date of the last report of the commission this land was unclaimed, but since then Mr. Ker- yand has established his claim to it. The entire cost of the land and the expenses incidental to the work ef commission are shown in the subjoined abstract; Cost of land acquired by agreement.-...........----.----- $158, 355. 76 Cost of land acquired by condemnation..............---- "32, 468. 83 —————. $190, 824. 59 Clerical; legalj:andtother. expenses.2s2: = 22saea 28 tetas? seh Sa ee 8, 789. 57 Gta pe ONbONG = 2-5 Se ono eee owe Ee ee eee eee eee 199, 614. 16 It will be seen that the expense of purchase has been brought within the $200,000 appropriated by Congress, and that there remains a balance of $385.84. That the purchase has been an advantageous one for the Government appears to be shown by the fact that in the two years since it was made the value of land in that region has increased considerably over 100 per cent. The commissioners desire to add that from their care not to exceed the limits of the appropriation they were obliged to omit, on account of its higher cost, the pur- chase of about eight acres of land on the southern side of the park, as indicated on’ the accompanying map, in spite of the fact that the nature of the ground makes it, in their opinion, for the interest of the Government to secure it, and they respect- fully recommend its acquisition at a cost of not over $50,000. Having covered into the United States Treasury all the funds remaining in its pos- session, the Zoological Park Commission believes that it has completed the duties with which it was charged by the act of Congress of March 2, 1889, and respectfully presents this as its final report. ° , JOHN W. Nose, Secretary of the Interior. J. W. Dovatass, President of the Boar d of Commissioners of the District of Columbia. S. P. LANGLEY, Secretary Smithsonian Institution. Commissioners for the Establishment of a Zoological Park in the District of Columbia. Referred to Committee on the District of Columbia. WVINMA 13° Ral" | SNK COMMI22ISMEKS DEOROZED IM BEDOKL OF VVLIOVNT SOOTORINE EWHK' OU LHE EV2LEBU 21DE Ok LHE bTOL OL YODLLIOM ~ ~ . ™. wit. . . te) os = . wa ae SS. . . : ~ or ~. ae “q aie . se = a -. ae =f Ss "Sa . o. . 7. ~ Sars ms . 7. ‘ cies a os ars ' ees =e ’ ’ oy == ’ , mr — ’ ~ - ‘ ?; nc es =. ’ ’ Sal ~- ’ iv = aie r . — - ’ , Nise ’ . Fs ’ i ie ree) = . . ry X ‘ . — # ’ 2 ' ’ be A ’ uf a ace “ a. . ’ Secs a iu eee Z - eae ’ > Tao, * - ’ os, t es pean | . 1 ' . ' ' sit es . Ss . . alr ‘Q: ii 1 ths Coes . ‘ 3 if ’ : t ’ » ‘ ' ' ’ , ee | LS bee! be *e ee osm enn ce ee “s NG . oe - Rea 5 "a Te ' sie | y" ! rt ee A el ee PLOT OF ADDITION ON THE EASTERN SIDE OF THE NATIONAL ZOOLOGICAL PARK, : PROPOSED IN REPORT OF PARK COMMISSIONERS JANUARY 19 ™, 1691. 6.83 ACRES. POPLAR ao s ~ FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1348 January 22, 1891—Senate. The Vicre-PREsIDENT (Mr. Levi P. Morron) laid before the Sen- ate the final report of the commission for the establishment of a zoological park in the District of Columbia, which, with the accom- panying papers, was referred to Committee on the District of Colum- bia. Mr. Witu1am B. Axuison subsequently said: What became of the report respecting the zoological park ? The Vicr-PRreEsIDENT. It was referred to the Committee on the Dis- trict of Columbia. Mr. Auuison. I do not object to the reference. I think the subject will have to be considered by the Committee on Appropriations, but I have no objection to its going to the District Committee. The Vicr-PRrEsIDENT. The Chair is under the impression that the Committee on the District of Columbia has heretofore had considera- tion of the subject, but if agreeable the report will be referred to the Committee on Appropriations. Mr. F. M. Cocxretu. There is nothing but an appropriation about it. It ought to go to the Committee on Appropriations. The Vicr-PREsIDENT. The communication, with the accompanying papers, will be referred to the Committee on Appropriations, if there be no objection. Mr. Auuison. Very well. NATIONAL ZOOLOGICAL PARK—ORGANIZATION. January 23, 1890—Senate. Mr. J. S. Mokrixu introduced a bill (S. 2284): That there be, and hereby is, appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the organization, improvement, and maintenance of the National Zoological Park, to be expended under the direction of the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, the following sums of money: For the shelter of animals, $15,000. For shelter barns, cages, fences, and inclosures, and other provisions for the custody of animals, $9,000. For repairs to the Holt mansion, to make the same aati for occupancy, and for office furniture, $2,000. For the creation of artificial ponds and other provisions for aquatic animals, $2,000. For water supply, sewerage, and drainage, $7,000. For roads, walks, and bridges, $15,000. For miscellaneous supplies, materials, and sundry incidental expenses not other- wise provided for, $5,000. For current expenses, including the maintenance of collections, food supplies, sala- ries of all necessary employees, and the acquisition and transportation of specimens, $37,000. Sec. 2. That the National Zoological Park is hereby placed under the direction of the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, who are authorized to-transfer to it any living specimens, whether of animals or plants, now or hereafter in their charge, to accept gifts for the park at their discretion, in the name of the United States, to ‘ 1344 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. make exchanges of specimens, and to administer the said Zoological Park for the advancement of science and the instruction and recreation of the people. Sec. 3. That the heads of Executive Departments of the Government are hereby authorized and directed to cause to be rendered all necessary and practicable aid to the said Regents in the acquisition of collections for the Zoological Park. Referred to Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds. January 27, 1890—Senate. Mr. J. S. Morrix, from the Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds, to whom was referred the bill (S. 2284), reported it without amendment. ; February 10, 1890—Senate. — Mr. J. S. Morritx. I now ask for the consideration of Order of Business 253, Senate bill 2284. There béing no objection, the bill (S. 2284) for the organization, improvement, and maintenance of the National Zoological Park was considered as in Committee of the Whole. The bill was reported to the Senate without amendment, and ordered _ to be engrossed for a third reading. Mr. Morriww. Instead of making a speech, I have taken pains to collect a good many facts in relation to this matter, which I ask to have printed in the Record instead of making any remarks upon the subject. The Vicr-PrestpEent (Mr. L. P. Morton). The paper submitted will be printed in the Record if there be no objection. The Chair hears none. The paper presented by Mr. Morrill was as follows: SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, Washington, D. C., February 6, 1890. Dear Sir: I beg, in handing you the accompanying specifications in detail of the estimates for the expenses of the National*Zoological Park for 1890-91, to say that, while only the numbered items are intended to form heads of appropriations, it would be advantageous if these were rather lumped together than subdivided into even as many items as there now are; and I trust, if there be any amendment, that it will be in the directfon rather of uniting than subdividing them. In particular, I hope that the amount for current expenses, now set at $37,000, will be given in a lump sum. R I think that a simple inspection will show that all these items are not estimates made large with the expectation of their being cut down, but an economical and, I trust, evidently carefully considered statement of what seems necessary for a begin- ning. The only item which may seem to need explanation is that of the salaries of the twenty-four employees for the first year, when, as everything is in a state of preparation merely, it might be supposed that fewer would be needed; but it will. be remembered that the park is not like a building, from which the public can be excluded during the process of construction, and that the public will doubtless insist upon making itself present everywhere from the first, so that I am rather apprehensive that more. watchmen and laborers, rather than less, will be needed, with perhaps the possible occasion for the cost of consultation with a landscape a eee a eee FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1345 gardener, I think I may feel entirely justified in stating also, from my past experi- ence, that as soon as it is known that the Regents of this Institution are ready to accept donations for the Government donations will come to them from all parts of our national territory, so that the need for accommodation will be more immediate and more pressing than would be inferred from the list of animals already under the charge of the Regents, which I inclose. It now seems probable that there will be a small surplus from the appropriation of $200,000 for purchase. It is impossible to say what this surplus, if any, will be until the courts have fixed the condemnation prices, but the commissioners hope it will be over $10,000. You will be the best judge whether to provide in the bill for the application of any such contingent residue to general purposes, and also whether any provision for immediate availability is needed. I inclose the list just referred to of animals now under the charge of the Regents on the Smithsonian grounds. It will be remembered that this represents the accessions of only two years, principally by gift, although there has been no wide publicity given to the fact that such a collection was commenced, and though the Secretary has been obliged in many cases to ask intendihg donors to delay their gifts until better provision could be made for caring for them. I am, with great respect, yours, very respectfully,’ S. P. Lanewery, Secretary. Hon. J. S. Morrit1, United States Senate. Explanations in detail of the estimates in the bill (S. 2284) for the eapenses of the National Zoological Park for 1890-91. ReneNoe— hor the shelter-or animaise+---42o-c + chats eee. ce sa see a 5 ae $15, 000 Includes— 1, Large animal house (half permanent structure) to furnish imme- diate accommodations for subtropical animals; and for lions, tigers, ostriches, kangaroos, camels, etc.; to cost $10,000. 2. An aviary, monkey, and reptile house, combined temporarily; to be the central portion of a permanent building for birds alone, < but at first-it must also provide for monkeys-and reptiles; to cost ~ about $5,000. Item No. 2— For shelter barns, cages, fenees, and inelosures, and other pro- 28" visions for the custody of the animale 2232.22 5 2. Sect - 9, 000 Includes— 1. Barn for buffalo and elk herds, $1,500. 2. Fences for 8 ruminant yards, and 6 shelter barns, $3,000. .3. Series of 4 bear dens and cages, $3,000. 4. Series of 15.iron cages for wolves, foxes, etc., $1,500. Item No. 8—For repairs to the Holt mansion to make the same suitable for occupancy, and for office. furniture... 5-6-5 <-n= 15-ahe- CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Mr. McComas. I yield five minutes to the gentleman from Penn- sylvania [Mr. Atkinson]. Mr. L. E. Arxrnson, of Pennsylvania. Mr. Speaker, I have serious doubts whether the chairman of the Committee on Appropriations would oppose concurrence in the Senate amendment if he had exam- ined into this question as carefully as perhaps he might have done. If I understood his remarks he stated that the title to this land is vested jointly in the United States and in the District of Columbia. Am I right as to that? Mr. Cannon. I said, or should have said, that this property was bought with an appropriation made payable one-half from the District revenues and.one-half from the Federal Treasury, but bought under the direction of Congress, Congress being supreme as to the District treasury as well as the Federal Treasury. Mr. Arxrnson, of Pennsylvania. I wish, then, to call attention to the fact that although the District of Columbia contributed half the money for the purchase of this land, yet the title was vested in the United States by virtue of the act of Congress making this appropria- tion. That act declares that— The value shall be paid to the owner or owners; and the United States shall be deemed to have a valid title to said land. That is the act of March 2, 1889, passed only a little more than a year ago for the purpose of acquiring title to this land. The title is not in the District and never can become a portion of the property of the District without an act of Congress. Mr. Cannon. But so far as that is concerned (if the gentleman will allow me), Congress is supreme; and when as a matter of convenience the title was deemed to be in the United States, the District revenues paying one-half the expense, the gentleman understands that the Dis- trict has a half interest in the property. Mr. Arxrinson, of Pennsylvania. It does not so appear upon the face of the papers. Now, the question arises whether it is proper to impose an addi- tional burden upon this District for that which is declared in the act a national enterprise, established for the benefit of, science. Is this District in such a financial condition that it should have additional - charges imposéd upon it, especially without good and sufficient rea- sons? Any one taking up the annual report of the Commissioners of the District of Columbia will see that there is already resting upon this District a debt of almost $19,000,000. There is more than $14,000,000 of bonded indebtedness bearing interest at 3.65 per cent, the rest bearing interest at a higher rate. If the debt of this District were compared with that of almost any other city in the United States it would be found that it is greater in proportion to the assessed value of the land than the indebtedness of any other city. — eC FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1385 My friend from Illinois says the tax rate here is remarkably low. I can not speak for other Pea istios, I do not know what the average tax rate of the cities of the United States may be. But the tax rate of this city on real and personal estate is $1.50 per $100, not such a trifle after all; and I am told that property is assessed at a very full valuation here. That being so, I take it the interests of the city should be considered; and it should not be compelled to pay one-half the expense of setting up and maintaining a park national in its char- acter which under the circumstances can not be considered local in any sense of the word. It is not purely for the benefit of the people of this District, it is not only for the present benefit of the whole people of the United States, but. it is intended to preserve animals likely to become extinct, and in that way to benefit succeeding gener- ations. I take it that the Senate amendment to this bill should be concurred in. Mr. L. E. Payson. Will the gentleman from Pennsylvania yield to me for a question ? Mr. Arxrnson, of Pennsylvania. Certainly. Mr. Payson. Will the gentleman take the same ground next Mon- day when the Rock Creek Park bill comes here? Mr. Arxinson, of Pennsylvania. I can not now say what ground I will take. Mr. Payson. I should be glad of the gentleman’s help on that question. Mr. Arxinson, of Pennsylvania. I will meet that question when it _ arises. [Here the hammer fell. ] Mr. McComas. I will reserve the remainder of my time. Mr. Cannon. I have the close and would be glad if the gentleman from Maryland would use his time now. Mr. F. B. Spryoia. How much time is there left? [Cries of ‘‘ Vote!” **Vote!”] The Spraxer. The Chair is of the opinion the gentleman from IIli- nois [Mr. Cannon] in charge of the bill is entitled to open and close on this question. It is very true this is a motion that has priority, but after all it is but the reversal of the same motion made by the gentleman from Illinois; and if it is carried in the negative the effect of it at once is to nonconcur. Mr. McComas. I will yield to the gentleman from Massachusetts Mr. Candler]. Mr. J. W. Canpier, of Massachusetts. Mr. Speaker, I am in favor of the motion of the gentleman from Maryland [Mr. McComas], because I claim it is not wise for the Government to enter into copartnership with the District of Columbia in her public museum or zoological garden. If the Fiftieth Congress introduced that idea, I think it 1386 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. would be better for the Fifty-first Congress to close up and dissolve the copartnership. . It is not a fair proposition that representation and taxation shall not go together. If the Government of the United States and the people of the United States propose to tax the District of Columbia on this measure, then they should give representation to it. Mr. Speaker, I go further than that Mr. Buiount. As to giving them representation, does not the gen- tleman know that representation has been taken from the District of Columbia at its own request? Is not that the present status? Mr. Canpuer, of Massachusetts. But that does not change my proposition—that if you tax the people here, justly you should give them representation. Mr. Biount. The people here are not suffering any grievance as to the matter of representation. Mr. Canpuer, of Massachusetts. We are discussing a general prin- ciple, and so far as the Government is concerned I do not believe in the wisdom of the United States Government entering into a copart- nership with the District of Columbia in any of her public buildings or museums. As a business proposition it is not wise. It is not wise or fair to the District for the 60,000,000 of people to enter into an expenditure with this District of 200,000 population. Perhaps in the future, if you desire to develop this institution as this wealthy nation may desire, if it is to be useful and creditable to the country, the Government may find it necessary to incur a larger expenditure than the District of Columbia could afford with its limited population. Let us meet the question here, and if we think the Government should continue this enterprise, if it can afford to tax the people in behalf of this enterprise to-day, let us meet it here and let us not organize a measure to establish and add to a great public museum and tax one- half the expense on the 200,000 people in the District of Columbia, who have no direct control to limit the expenditure. I go further than that. It is not a fair illustration to compare the city of Chicago or the city of New York with the District of Columbia. They have great wealth, millions of people, whereas we are entering into nothing else than a kind of copartnership with 200,000 people here; burdening a small District with a heavy and yearly tax, continuous but uncertain as to the amount. Mr. BreckinripGk, of Kentucky. Many only temporarily here. Mr. Canpier, of Massachusetts. And we should be extremely cautious when we organize any enterprise which may put a heavy bur- den of taxation upon the population in the District of Columbia. Many of them are men whose salaries are not sufficiently remunerative to enable them to enter into any uncertain expenditure. Something has been said, Mr. Speaker, about the low rate of taxa- | FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1387 tion prevailing in this city. I say that it ought to be low.. If you wish to be economical in the salaries of the employees of the Govern- ment, you should be careful not to enter upon the policy of extravagant expenditures that will lay heavy burdens upon them. But the three propositions I have presented here are those which influence me in regard to this matter. The people, if they erect a National Museum, should control it for all the citizens of the country, but not unite with the people of the District of Columbia in that control. Mr. Benton McMinn. Will the gentleman allow me to interrupt him for a question just there? Your position, as I understand it, is that it encourages a partnership in taxation or expenditure between the United States and the government of the District of Columbia. Mr. CanpieEr, of Massachusetts. In regard to the public Museum and the Smithsonian, and institutions of that character. Mr. McMurry. Does not the gentleman know that there is a part- nership already entered into between the National Government and the District of Columbia to-day ? ' Mr. Canpier, of Massachusetts. I beg pardon, but it has no rel- evancy to the question I am discussing. But, Mr. Speaker, I do not think it necessary to elaborate the prop- ositions I have already presented. I say if the Government of the United States can not afford, in a dignified way, as the representative of the whole people, to carry on a measure of this public importance— a public museum in a proper manner—then let us drop the whole mat- ter; let us stop right here and not shift half of the expenditures to the people of the District. Mr. Brecxryrivcr, of Kentucky. If the gentleman will permit me just one moment, in the line of the question suggested by the gentle- man from Tennessee, I wish to say that the District of Columbia does not pay anything for repairs for the Patent Office, for instance; nor does it pay for the Library. Mr. McMirurn. I did not make any such statement. All that I desired to call attention to is just this, that there is a debt incurred for - the benefit of the city of Washington, and the Government is now paying one-half of the interest on it and is burdened with one-half of the expense of running the government of the District. Mr. Brecxinriner, of Kentucky. But that is the very point. The District of Columbia and the General Government do not go partners as to the permanent appropriations that the United States make for permanent improvements. It is a temporary arrangement by which the Government of the United States, the largest land owner in the District, pays one-half of the taxation for the running of the city govy- ernment and certain expenses. But as to all of the appropriations which are of a permanent char- acter, and which belong to the Government of the United States as a 1888 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Government exclusively, the District of Columbia is not taxed. For instance, they pay nothing for the erection of the building—the Library —we are putting up, nothing for the public buildings in the city, nothing for the repairs of the Treasury Department, which is in the urgent deficiency bill. The Government runs itself, pays its own expenses, builds its own buildings, makes its own permanent improve- ments. All it does in this matter is, that the Smithsonian Institution, with its several collateral bureaus, is under the control of the Govern- ment. The President of the United States is ex officio its president; the Chief Justice of the United States is its chancellor, and we select its directors; now why should the District of Columbia pay any part of the expense or be allowed to have any voice in the matter? Mr. CanpuEr, of Massachusetts. I do not care, Mr. Speaker, to enter into the question of the technical relations between the Govern- ment of the United States and the District of Columbia, or what rela- tions may have existed in the past between them. I wish simply to present the propositions which I have already expressed in regard to this museum. I will conclude what I desired to say by suggesting that in my judgment it is most unwise legislation, for if we are to have a museum at all for the nation, one controlled by the Government, then the Government should pay the expense of it, and if we can not afford to have one on such terms then let us give it up altogether and not attempt it. Mr. McComas. I yield two minutes to the gentleman from Ken- tucky. Mr. Brecxinriper, of Kentucky. Mr. Speaker, 1 wish simply to draw a distinction between this so-called park and the proposed Rock Creek Park. Iam opposed to the latter—to the Rock Creek park— for the reason that it is a ‘‘dress-parade” park, a park intended for beautification, for adornment. But the suggestion embodied in this bill has these elements only as incidents, and has nothing to do with the purposes of the other park atall. This stands upon the same footing as the Bureau of Ethnology, for instance, which is under the control of the Smithsonian Institu- tion. It stands precisely upon the same ground as expenditures for the Smithsonian itself, and is of the same general nature as a bill which passed the other day to authorize the Treasury Department to employ a man at $10 a day and send him to Alaska to study and learn, if possible, the habits of the seal. That is to enable us to understand how we shall make contracts about the seal fisheries. These are for purposes arising from scientific investigation. I only refer to that as an illustration; and the two institutions referred to—the two parks—have nothing in common, except that both are lands to be purchased by public money. Mr. McComas. I now yield to the gentleman from Illinois [Mr. Hill]. i ; FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1389 Mr. C. A. Hix. Mr. Speaker, I hope the Senate amendment will be adopted. Ithinkitisright. I can see nosubstantial reason why it should not be adopted. This is a national park and it should be pur- chased and paid*for at the national expense. The title to this Zoological Park is, or will be when completed, wholly in the United States. It is true that it has been paid for in part by taxes levied on the people of the District of Columbia; but’ nevertheless it is national in its character, and the title to it rests in part in the United States, and when the condemnation proceedings are completed the title to the entire park will be in the Government of the United States. The Zoological Park, Mr. Speaker, contains 1664 acres, and is located about 2 miles from the President’s mansion, in a northwestern direction, on what is known as Rock Creek. The object and purpose of that bill is fully explained by the second section, in which it is said: That the National Zoological Park is hereby placed under the direction of the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, who are authorized to transfer to it any living specimens, whether of animals or plants, now or hereafter in their charge, to accept gifts for the park at their discretion, in the name of the United States, to make exchanges of specimens, and to administer the said Zoological Park for the advancement of science and the instruction and recreation of the people. Mr. Speaker, that is not a local matter. It is not, except in its name, and to some extent in its purpose, even a national matter. It is for the benefit of the world of science, not merely of America, but in the world at large. This section provides that all the plants and animals now in charge of the Smithsonian Institution shall be placed in this park and taken care of. By whom? By the people of the District of Columbia? Not at all. By officers appointed and selected by them? Notatall. But by the Regents of the Smithsonian Insti- tution, a national institution. It is thus placed in the direct charge of the officials of the United States Government. | The title to this property rests as much in the United States as the title to the Capitol grounds on which this building stands. It is as much for the benefit of the entire United States as the Museum or any other public institution to which any gentlemen on this floor can point. And I can see no good reason why the people of the District of Columbia should be made to bear a part of the expense, not merely to-day, to-morrow, this year or next, but for all time to come, because the precedent which we set in this appropriation will be for the guid- ance of future Congresses for all time. I say it is unwise and unprecedented; and, Mr. Chairman, if I could have a word more in reply to the question put by my colleague from Illinois, as to whether gentlemen upon this floor will vote for another park project called the Columbus Park. We had a bill of that kind up a few days since. The distinction is clear. That is directly for 1390 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. the benefit of the people of the locality where Columbus Park is to be inaugurated or established. Do gentlemen propose to place upon it exhibits belonging to the United States Government? The title, even, will not rest in the United States, but’in the District of Columbia. Here in this case the title to this property is in the United States; it will remain in the people of the United States. The property that is to be placed there, such as plants and animals, is the property of the United States; and I close as I began, with the remark that I can see no reason why the people of the United States should not bear the expenses of maintaining this Zoological Park. Mr. McComas. I now yield three minutes to the gentleman from New Jersey [Mr. Buchanan]. Mr. Bucuanan, of New Jersey. Mr. Speaker, the gentleman from Kentucky [Mr. Bree ide has very well described the difference between the Zoological Park and that other park which was proposed here the other day, and I need add no word upon that point. He well said that the one is for beauty and for adornment, a place, if you please— Where love may wander amid the leafy bowers And beauty hold the reins along the circling drives. I only hope that when love does thus wander, and beauty does thus hold the reins, my dear colleagues, you may re there to see—yea, to participate. Mr. BurrerworrtH. But not in crowds, though. Mr. Bucuanan, of New Jersey. The Zoological Park is for an alto- gether different purpose. It is for a scientific purpose, and it is only because it is for that purpose that the Congress of the United States has, in my judgment, any authority to appropriate one dollar for its organization and its maintenance. It is a legitimate outgrowth of the scientific work of the Smithsonian Institution, and the purpose of its establishment in the Government was purely scientific. Because it is for that purpose there should be no call upon the people of any par- ticular locality to help the Government to contribute toward its sup- port. You might justas well say that the people of the District when they wander down the aisles of the National Museum and see there those magnificent groups which Professor Hornaday has mounted, and mounted with all the excellence of the taxidermist’s art until they almost rival nature herself, should pay one-half of the expense. You might as well say that because they wander at times through the grounds of the Smithsonian Institute and of the Agricultural Depart- ment and see and study there and in the Botanical Gardens the differ- ent kinds of rare plants grouped at so much expense they must con- tribute one-half of the expense of operating those institutions. The very statement of the proposition shows that it is unsound. a a a a FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1391 Sir, there is another side to the question of how the people of the District of Columbia are treated by Congress. In many respects they have been treated well, but in some other respects the record is dark and disgraceful. The construction of the Aqueduct is an instance. Over in yonder ridge back of the city lie buried a round million of their dollars, useless—stolen. [Here the hammer fell. | The SPEAKER pro tempore. The time of the gentleman has expired. The pending question is the motion of the gentleman from Maryland. Mr. Cannon. I yield five minutes to the gentleman from Georgia [Mr. Clements], and if he wants more I will try to give it. Mr. Speaker, how much time have I remaining? The SprakerR pro tempore. The Chair under stands that the gentle- man has eleven minutes remaining. Mr. Cannon. I believe the Chair has made a mistake, if I had an hour in the first instance. Mr. Ciements. There must be some mistake about that. The SPEAKER pro tempore. That is the information the Chair has. Mr. Cannon. That is on the theory that I had an hour or half an hour ? The SprakeER pro tempore. The gentleman had an hour. Mr. Cannon. There has not been any of my time taken up except what I took myself, and I am sure I only took about ten minutes. Mr. Buount. The gentleman yielded ten minutes to me. The SpEaKER pro tempore. The Chair is informed that the gentle- man yielded ten minutes to the gentleman from Georgia. Mr. Cannon. Then how much did I usé myself ? The Speaker pro tempore. The Chair is not advised as to that. The gentleman has now twenty-one minutes remaining. Mr. Cannon. I hope the Chair will inquire about the matter. I will now yield five minutes to my colleague on the committee [Mr. Clements]. Mr. Ciements. I am very much obliged to the gentleman from Illinois [Mr. Cannon]. I think there must be some mistake about the time consumed by him. In the little time allotted to me I would be glad to have the attention of the House. I do not propose to be drawn by the gentleman from Massachusetts [Mr. Morse] into the question as to whether this is a nation, or a union of States, or both, nor will I now discuss the former tendency of Massachusetts toward secession. I want to talk about this as a business question. It seems to me that there has been a good deal of confusion about the matter. In the discussion the point is made that this appropriation will create a partnership between the District and the General Government in the management of this park. The tendency of courts as well as of legislators in our time is to drive to the. substance of questions 1392 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. involved and not to deal with technicalities, except to leave them. This bill, upon its face and in terms, provides for a national park, and it puts that park entirely under the management of the Smithsonian _ Institution; so the only feature in which there is to be a participation by the District is in contributing a part of the money to maintain it. Now, Congress has supreme power in this District of legislation and taxation, and if, under the present system, a certain amount of money, which is just and equitable, is taken from the people of this District by way of taxation, it is totally immaterial whether this park is paid for out of a fund gathered partly from the District or totally from the revenues of the Government of the United States, so that in making this provision we do no injustice to the tax-payers of the District of Columbia. The gentleman from New Jersey [Mr. Buchanan] alluded to the $1,000,000 paid by the District for the tunnel. I would call his attention to the fact that the records of the War Department show that to inaugurate the Aqueduct, the water system which brings water into this city, the Government of the United States, before the war and during the war and up to 1866, expended $3,250,000 of which the District did not contribute one cent. Since that time more than $500,000 have been applied by the Government to the enlargement of the Aqueduct and the water supply of this District, of which the District government has not contributed one cent. I would remind the gentleman that when the District sunk $1,000,000 in the tunnel the United States also sunk $1,000,000. Mr. Bucwanan, of New Jersey. Will the gentleman permit a ques- tion ? Mr. Ciements. I have not the time. If I had I would be glad to hear the gentleman’s question. Mr. Bucuanan, of New Jersey. The people pay a water tax. Mr. CuLeMENtTs. The water takers do pay their water tax for the current maintenance of the system, but they did not pay one cent for the establishment of the system, except in the bill of last year to increase the water supply. Of that expenditure they paid one-half, the whole of it being about $575,000. Further than that, the supreme court of the District of Columbia sits here and adjudicates cases nine- tenths of which arise between citizens of this District, and the Goy- ernment of the United States pays every dollar of its expenses, the salaries of the judges, the salaries of the marshals, even the fees of the witnesses and jurors. Every dollar of those expenses is paid out of the Federal Treasury. And yet, as I have said, it is a court almost wholly for the people of this District. Not only that, but there was expended last year for the Freedman’s Hospital, which is substantially a municipal affair, $54,000; $12,500 for the Garfield Hospital; for the maintenance of Providence Hos- FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1393 pital, $17,000, and for the improvement and care of public grounds, $116,000. The parks throughout this city The SPEAKER pro tempore. The time of the gentleman has expired. Mr. Cannon. [ will yield the gentleman some additional time. Mr. Ciements. I thank my friend from Illinois. The expenses of the supreme court of the District of Columbia for the last fiscal year, so far as paid, including marshals’, clerks’, prosecuting attorneys’, jurors’ fees and witnesses’ fees, amount to $116,776. Of this expendi- ture the District contributes no part. It contributes no part of the large amount that is appropriated annually for the maintenance of the parks within this city, their lighting, their pavements, their walks, the watchmen that guard and protect them, mainly for the benefit of the people of the District. The whole of that expenditure falls upon the Federal Government. The jail in which prisoners convicted of crimes committed in this District are imprisoned is maintained at the expense of the Federal Government, no part of its maintenance. being contributed by the District except in relation to the police court. Now, I do not wish to be unfair with the people of this District, and this Government is not so. I would remind my friend from Ohio [Mr. Butterworth] and other gentlemen of a little history in connec- tion with this zoological park. At the first session of the last Con- gress it came here from the Senate on the sundry civil bill, as a matter the expense of which was to be paid by the Federal Government. This House upon consideration deliberately rejected the propepition in that form. The proposition having been defeated at that time, Congress not being willing to establish this as a national park and pay the whole expense out of the general revenues, the friends of the measure brought it here at the second session of that Congress as an amendment to the District appropriation bill, and then we heard our friends here talking about the importance of a ‘‘ breathing place” out there, a spot where ’ the crowded multitudes of the city of Washington might go and enjoy pure, fresh air. Mr. Burrerwortn. Which park ii is the gentleman speaking of—the Rock Creek park ? Mr. CLEMENTS. Both have been urged upon the same grounds in this respect. Mr. Burrerwortu. Oh, no! Mr. Ciements. We have heard the same talk in regard to both enterprises. We had the same sort of arguments in favor of this bill as in support of the other. To-day the gentleman from Illinois [Mr. | Payson] asked the gentleman from Pennsylvania [Mr. Atkinson] whether he would be willing to take the same position on the Rock Creek park that he occupies on this question. I want to say to the H. Doce. 732 1394 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. gentleman from Illinois that he will find that the people of this Dis- trict who advocate the Rock:Creek park will be willing to take it as a partnership arrangement between the United States and the District until it has been established, and then at the next session it will be urged that it must be treated as national. We shall then hear that it is undignified to have the people of this District pay half of the expense of supporting such an institution, and that it must be unloaded upon the Government. Now, the appropriations for the District of Columbia for the present fiscal year amount to $5,682,000. In 1881 the amount was $3,426,000. It will be seen that for the present fiscal year the amount is nearly double what it was in 1881. One-half of the amount for the present fiscal year, which is charged to the Federal Government, is $2,841,000, in addition to the expenses of the supreme court of the District, the hospitals, and the other things which I have enumerated, and for the public parks of this District, all of which the Federal Government pays. Mr. McComas. In all the estimates for the District of Columbia was one dollar asked for this park? Did they want it? Mr. Ciements. They wanted this park; there was a great clamor here for it. The title is in the Federal Government; its management is vested in the Smithsonian Institution. The question simply is, whether, when the Government is already paying largely more than is its share in this District, is it just that the whole support of this Zoological Park shall be assumed by the General Government? I think the District should pay half of it. Mr. Burrerwortn. I think it is but fair to call my friend’s atten- tion to the fact that he was not heroic in resisting these enormous appropriations for the District of Columbia. Mr. Crements. Well, I did my best. I did not support this park. 1 was not here when the District bill was up at this session. I was sick, and you rushed it through. I have always supported what I believed necessary for the District. It should be remembered that when the District government was abolished the debt of the District was over $20,000,000 and its bonds were far below par. The United States has assumed and is paying one-half of this, as well as current expenses. . Mr. Cannon. I now yield to the gentleman from Missouri [Mr. Dockery] ten minutes, or so much thereof as he may desire. Mr. Dockery. I am obliged to the gentleman from Illinois, and will endeavor to repay the courtesy by not occupying the entire time. Mr. Speaker, the question at issue here is whether the Government should pay the entire expense of maintaining the Zoological Park, or whether the District of Columbia should be required to pay one-half. In determining, at least, the moral responsibility of Congress it is FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1395 well to consider the circumstances under which the act authorizing the park was passed. If I am not incorrectly advised, the act estab- lishing it originated in the Senate in the form of an amendment to the District of Columbia appropriation bill—presumably reflecting the views of eitizens and others here who were urging the establishment of the park. The original proposition authorizing it provided that one-half of the sum appropriated, which was $200,000, should be paid by the District of Columbia; and the gentleman from South Carolina [Mr. Hemphill], then chairman of the Committee on the District of Colum- bia, stated on this floor, as an argument and inducement for the House to pass the bill, that one-half of the entire expenditure was to be paid by the District. And yet, Mr. Speaker, although the date of the approval of that act was March 2, 1889, now but a little more than thirteen months subsequent to its approval, a proposition originates in the Senate that the Government shall bear the entire burden of this enterprise. Mr. Speaker, I did not support the original proposition; I voted against it; but as a member of the Committee on Appropriations, I - consented to this appropriation, conceiving it to be my duty (the law having established the park) to provide for its maintenance and sup- port. But, sir, | must confess’ my surprise at the position taken by seme members in the course of this debate. Why, sir, the gentleman from Ohio [Mr. Butterworth], as I understand, puts this proposition for the maintenance of a zoological park virtually ‘‘on all fours” with a proposition to erect a Government building. Why, Mr. Speaker, a Government building is essential to the dis- charge of the functions of Government, whereas for the one hundred years of our constitutional existence this Government has been main- tained (passing meanwhile through a great civil war) without the aid of any zoological park. The gentleman from Massachusetts, in the same line of observation, spoke of a new policy as having been inaugurated in regard to this District subsequent to 1861. I do not desire, Mr. Speaker, to trench upon any partisan ground; but I wish to correct that statement of the gentleman. I have before me an exhibit of the expenditures made by the Government for the District of Columbia from 1800 to 1871. I find that in 1800 these expenditures for streets, alleys, and other improvements amounted to $10,000, and in 1871—ten years after the date named by the gentleman from Massachusetts—the expenditures were still $10,000. I further find that in 1860 the expenditures were $13,518.87—$3,518.87 more than they were in 1871. The record of appropriations, therefore, acquits this side of the House of the charge of a want of proper regard for the capital city of our country during the long period that the Democratic party con- trolled the Government prio1 to 1861 13967 ~ CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Mr. Butrerwortu. Does my friend think that the Yellowstone National Park is essential to carry on the Government, or that the National Museum in this city is so . Mr. Dockery. No, sir; Ido not. I think the gentleman misappre-— hended my statement. I understood him, in reply to a question of the gentleman. from Massachusetts [Mr. Cogswell], to put a Govern- ment building ‘‘on all fours” as to its purposes and necessities with the proposed park. | Mr. Butrerwortn. Or any of the educational institutions of the — country more than this scientific institution ? Mr. Dockxsery. Mr. Speaker, it seems to me that the analogy sug- gested by the gentleman from Ohio wholly fails. I know of no fune- tions connected with a monkey, tiger, or lion which are in any wise essential to the public defense or necessary to discharge the functions of Government, whilst a Government building does facilitate the trans- action of public business in the matter of collecting revenues, the dispatch of the mails, and in various other ways. Mr. BurrerwortH. Is my friend opposed to the zoological park? Mr. Dockery. Iam. I stated a moment ago that I favored this appropriation, not because I was an advocate of the park, but Con- gress having already, after full discussion, inaugurated the enterprise, I thought it my duty, as a member of the Committee on Appropria- tions, to obey the mandate of the law authorizing it, which law also provides that the District of Columbia shall pay one-half of the expense. Mr. McComas. The law does not do it. Mr. BreckrinrinGr, of Kentucky. Will the gentleman allow me to ask him a question # Mr. Dockery. Certainly. Mr. BrecxinrinGr, of Kentucky. If the partnership between the General Government and the District of Columbia is dissolved and this District is given a government of its own, with a council and cor- poration, then how will my friend agree to the division of the zoologi- cal park and the various rights in equity which will grow up under this system 4 | Mr. Dockery. ‘‘Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof.” Now, Mr. Speaker, one word as to the question of a local government, sug- gested by my friend from Kentucky. I do not wish to say anything that will offend gentlemen on the other side of this Chamber, but the gentleman from Massachusetts [Mr. Candler] announced the proposi- tion that taxation and representation should go hand in hand. ‘That proposition is fundamental and has my hearty approval. The gentle- man from Ohio [Mr. Butterworth] had something to say in the same direction. He insisted that there should be some modification of the existing District government. In reply to this suggestion, Mr. Speaker, I desire to state in behalf of the Democratic party that it is no fault of ours that the District of FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1397 Columbia is without a local government; for, if I remember aright, it was the Forty-third Congress, which was Republican in both branches, that passed the bill denying representation and a local government to the people of this District. At that time the Republican party exer- cised almost unchallenged sway in all the departments of the Govern- ment. The repeal was thought by our Republican friends to bea necessity, confronted as they were with an expenditure of four or five millions of dollars, piled up under two years of local rule. Mr. Speaker, I ami perhaps willing to favor the reestablishment of a local govern- ment in this District for the one reason, if for no other, that we may have right here under the very shadow of the Capitol an exemplifica- tion of the peculiar virtues of that type of government which some gentlemen in this countr ae wrcte anxious to impose upon the people of the South. Mr. McComas. My friend wits to be right in his history ¢ Mr. Dockery. Certainly. Mr. McComas. He will find the act of 1878 passed during the Forty- fifth Congress, which was Democratic. The law was a wise one, although it happened to be a Democratic Congress. Mr. Dockery. If my recollection is not at fault, and I will put my recollection against his Mr. McComas. It is the act of 1878, and you can count it up yourself. Mr. Docxrry. Mr. Speaker, my recollection is that the ‘‘colored troops” in the District of Columbia were disfranchised by the Repub- lican party in the Forty-third Congress, when that party had a two- thirds majority in this House, a majority in the Senate, and the eehaed tive. If, however, the act was passed, as stated by my friend, 1878, iter poriuinky it will not be denied that the Republican eae Biitrolied the Senate at that time, and there was a Republican gentle- man in the White House who was acting as President of the United States. Mr. McComas. I misunderstood the original statement of the gen- tleman from Missouri. I was referring to the date of the organic act authorizing the present government of the District of Columbia, which was approved June 11, 1878. The gentleman is correct in the state- ment that the bill repealing the local government in the District was passed in the Forty-third Congress. Mr. Docxmry. I am glad to have the accuracy of my statement con- firmed by my friend from Maryland. I find upon investigation that the repealing act was approved June 20, 1874, when the Democratic party was in the minority in all the departments of the Government. [Here the hammer fell. | Mr. Cannon. I now yield five minutes to my colleague from Illinois [Mr. Hopkins]. 1398 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. ~ Mr. A. J. Hopkins: Mr. Speaker, I can express in less than the time allotted to me all that I desire to say on this subject. I trust that every member of this House will understand that a vote in favor of the motion made by the gentleman from Maryland is a vote to saddle upon the General Government the entire expense of main- taining this park, and that a vote against his motion is a vote in favor of making the District of Columbia divide that expense. The gentleman from Ohio [Mr. Butterworth], as well as the gentle- man from Kentucky [Mr. Breckinridge], has spoken eloquently of making this a national park and compelling the General Government to pay the entire expense. As I understand it, sir, it is no less a national! park if we compel the wealthy inhabitants of Washington and the District of Columbia to bear their fair proportion of the expense. It is under the control of the General Government now, and will continue under the control of the General Government for all time, whether that division of expense is made or not. But the District of Columbia is likewise under the control of the General Goy- ernment, and it is entirely proper that the legislators in the two bodies of Congress should determine whether it is equitable and proper to take the entire amount out of the Treasury of the United States, or to compel the people of the District of Columbia to pay one part of it. Now, it goes without argument that the establishment of the park and the-maintenance of it has largely enhanced the value of property in all sections of the city of Washington; and, as a matter of equity, as a matter of just law, I can see no good reasen why the people who have these special advantages and benefits from that great park should not pay correspondingly for the advantages they enjoy. No such benefits can be said to arise in favor of the taxpayers generally throughout the country. Will any gentleman say that a resident in my district has the same advantages and can enjoy this park as well as a person residing in Washington City? Will anyone say that anyone residing in the State of Alabama has the same rights and the same privi- leges that he may enjoy from day to day as the person residing within the limits of this city? If not, then why should we compel these people by our votes to pay for this? The statement made on the floor to-day that the taxes imposed upon the property owners of Washington will not average one-half of the taxes imposed upon people in any other city of the United States, is a statement that has not been contradicted. It has not been denied by the men who favor the Government paying this entire cost. We can well understand, Mr. Speaker, why it is that wealthy men from all sections of the Union are coming to Washington and making it their home. It is because they can enjoy the special advantages granted to the people of this city which are given by the United States and paid for out of the public Treasury, while the people in the other cities and States of this Union, who are deprived largely of all these e . FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1399 - advantages, are ground down under burdens of: taxation to pay for a them. In view of these facts, Mr. Speaker, I say that this House should stand by the amendment that was proposed by the Committee on Appropriations and adopted by the House. They should say to these people and to the country that they propose that this expense shall be equitably divided between those who enjoy the results as special advantages and those who can only enjoy them for a brief season while here on pleasure trips. Mr. Cannon. Now, Mr. Speaker, in conclusion I desire to say that there has been much talk about the purposes of this park; much has been said that, to my mind, is misleading. Let us, then, go back to the main fact. One year ago, on the suggestion of the Senate, the House of Repre- sentatives, after full debate, concurred in the appropriation of $200,000 to buy this Zoological Park, one-half payable by the District of Colum- bia and one-half to come from the Federal Treasury. The property has been purchased. It was after the fullest consideration, and my friend from Ohio [Mr. Butterworth] and my friend from Kentucky [Mr. Breckinridge] were present and participated. . After this site has been bought and paid for, the Senate of the United States, by the pending proposition, says that now we are committed to the project we will release the revenues of the District of Columbia and will require the whole expense to be paid from the Federal Treasury. Against that I protest. It is not fair. That was not contemplated when this site was bought. On the contrary, the very provisions of the bill itself show that such was not the idea. Therefore, in my opinion, it is not just; it is not proper. Now, gentlemen have talked a good deal about the taxes in the Dis- trict. The truth is, I say again, taxation is not half as burdensome in this city as in most of the cities of the country. Asa result, many times millionaires from my own State and from New England and from Ohio and other parts of the nation come here and make their homes that they may enjoy the surroundings of Washington and escape with half the taxation they would necessarily pay if they remained where they made their fortunes. But gentlemen say that this is a national object, a national park. I ask is it not proper that this city, as the other cities of the country, should have its own zoological garden? Cincinnati, I believe, has one, Philadelphia has one, New York, and probably other cities. But they say the District of Columbia has no voice in the matter. No; that is true. The District of Columbia is controlled by Congress. The Con- gress of the United States is the government of the District and appro- priates the money for it; and at the same time we, for the time being, are masters of the Federal Treasury. I, for one, Mr. Speaker, am not willing to take the burden of one-half off the District of Columbia, 1400 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. where it was deliberately placed twelve months ago, and put it upon the people of the country at large. You may do it, gentlemen, if you want to. I will not. But, they say, this is under the control of the Smithsonian Institution. It is competent for Congress to put it anywhere it pleases, because Congress is the government for the District of Columbia; and so that there is nothing in that position. Now, I ask that the motion of the gentleman from Maryland be voted down, and for the purpose of getting a vote I move the previ- ous question. Mr. McComas. I ask unanimous consent that the previous question be considered as ordered. Mr. Cannon. Very well, let us have a vote. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The pending question is upon the notion of the gentleman from Maryland that the House recede from its amendment to the Senate bill. The question was put; and the SPEAKER pro tempore announced that the noes seemed to have it. Mr. McComas. Division. Mr. Buounr. Yeas and nays. [After a pause.] I withdraw that “demand. The House divided; and there were—ayes 18, noes 109. So the motion of Mr. McComas was rejected. The SpeaKER pro tempore. The question now is upon the motion -of the gentleman from Illinois [Mr. Cannon] that the House insist upon its amendment and ask a conference. The motion was agreed to. April 12, 1890—House. The Speaker (Mr. T. B. Reep) appointed conferees, Mr. J. G. Cannon, Mr. W. Cogswell, and Mr. J. D. Sayers. April 18, 1890—House. ; Mr. J. G. Cannon presented the report of a committee of con- ference: The committee of conference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses on the amendment of the House to the bill (S. 2284) for the organization, improvement, and maintenance of the National Zoolog- -ical Park, having met, after full and free conference, has been unable to agree. J. G. CANNON, JosEPH D. SAYERS, Managers.on the part of the House. Justin S. Morri1, JOHN C. SPOONER, G. G. Vrs; Managers on the part of the Senate. FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1401 Mr. Cannon. I move the adoption of this report. Adopted. . Mr. Cannon. I now move that the House further insist on its amendment. Mr. Louis E. McComas. Mr. Speaker, I would like to know from the gentleman in charge of this report what likelihood there is of an agreement between the two Houses, and also what are the grounds of difference. The report does not give us any information on those matters. ; Mr. Cannon. I will state so much as it is proper to state—that the House conferees met the Senate conferees; and the result is announced in the report which has been adopted by the House, that result being a disagreement. Now, ‘I can not say whether another conference would lead to an agreement or not. The House conferees felt them- selves substantially instructed—and were in harmony with that instruction, if it be an instruction—to insist Mr. James B. McCreary. Will the gentleman allow me a moment? Mr. Cannon. Let me finish my sentence—to insist upon the House amendment, which provides that the appropriation for the improve- ment of this park be payable one-half from the revenues of the Dis- trict of Columbia and one-half from the Treasury of the United States. Mr. McCreary. I wish to say that I am in favor of the position taken by the gentleman from Illinois [Mr. Cannon]. I am in favor of the District paying one-half of the amount appropriated by the bill. Mr. Cannon. Then the gentleman would be in favor of my motion, which is to insist upon the House amendment, and there stop. The Senate, if it desires any further conference, can, of course, make known its desire, or if the Senate wishes to concur in the amendment _It can do so. Mr. McComas. I wish to suggest to the gentleman in charge of the bill that perhaps there might be some agreement upon a consistent plan which would include the Army and Navy Museum, the National Museum, and this park, which is an adjunct of the Museum, so as to place them all under one general system. If we could agree upon a general system it would certainly be desirable; for it is inconsistent that as to a portion of these institutions which are under the scientific supervision of the Smithsonian Institution the expense should be paid by the General Government alone, while as to another portion under the supervision of this same institution for the advancement of science and knowledge the expenses should be paid by the local government of the District. The Government has its Museum for the exhibition of dead species of animals, and this park has been proposed in order that the living animals may be transferred from where they are now, back of the museum, to a separate inclosure. It does seem to me that if we are to have a national supervision of the whole thing, there ought 1402 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. to be a payment of the expenses of the whole from the National Treas- ury.: It is scarcely fair or just to impose on the people of this Dis- trict, who do not want this institution, who hope you will not have it Mr. Payson. Why does the gentleman say that? Mr. McComas. Has the gentleman from Illinois [Mr. Paseea heard of a single request or petition from anybody in the District of Colum- bia in behalf of this business? I have not. Mr. Payson, Yes; there have been scores of such requests. They came in here on the District bill, and this proposition now to saddle the entire cost of this park on the General Government is a fraud on the House, and every old member of the House knows it. Mr. A. C. THomeson. This institution ought not to be forced on the people of the District if they do not want it. ; Mr. McComas. And if they do not want it you ought to abolish this park—— Mr. Payson. I think so, too. Mr. McComas. But if you are going to have the park, then the Government, which proposes to force this whole thing on these peeple, and to move its buffaloes and camels to the park, ought to pay the expense. Mr. Cannon. I believe I have the floor. The SPEAKER. The House will be in order. Mr. McCreary. I would like to ask the gentleman from Maryland a question. Mr. Cannon. I believe I have the floor. Will the gentleman from ° Maryland have the kindness to indicate how much time he would like? Mr. McComas. I will yield until the gentleman from Illinois has finished. Mr. Cannon. I hope to be able to hold the floor, yielding a short time to the gentleman from Maryland, and- perhaps other gentlemen, and then to move the previous question. Several Members. All right. Mr. Cannon. I would be glad to yield a short time to the gentleman from Maryland if he will indicate how much. Mr. J. W. Canpuer, of Massachusetts. I hope the gentleman from Illinois will not call the previous question without giving some of us an opportunity to be heard. Mr. Cannon. Gentlemen were heard the other day. Mr. McComas. What is the gentleman’s motion ? Mr. Cannon. Before I yield to the gentleman, it is perhaps fair I should state that the other day, when this matter was fully discussed in the House, the vote stood 18 in favor of the House receding, and nearly 100 in favor of the House insisting. Mr. Ciemments. Over a hundred. or; wre — e-arrres . PORE HIG Os Ee ee ee eee FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. ~ 1408 Mr. CogswE.u. Yes; considerably more. Mr. Cannon. We met in conference with the Senate conferees, and an intimation, if it is proper for me to so state, was made there that perhaps the House would have to recede from its position or the park would be lost. I will make a reply here to any such suggestion—will not say whether it was made elsewhere or not—that this amendment originated in the Senate in the last Congress, and was put on the Dis- trict bill in the Senate and passed. It came to the House and the House reluctantly assented to the proposition, making it payable half and half, and the $200,000 were so appropriated. Now, in the Senate arises a new proposition to improve this ie park at the sole expense of the United States. And I say here and now, Mr. Speaker, that if it is the sense of the Senate to insist upon that amendment, so far as I am concerned the Zoological Garden may go into a state of ‘‘innocuous desuetude.” Mr. J. A. ANDERSON, of Kansas. Let it go. Mr. Cannon. Now, if nobody desires to be heard further, I move the previous question. Mr. McComas. I hope the gentleman will yield to me for a few moments; but before that, I wish to submit a parliamentary inquiry to the Chair. The Speaker. The gentleman will state it. . Mr. McComas. If the motion is made to recede, does that not take precedence of the motion to insist? The SPEAKER. It does. Mr. McComas. And does not that give the mover the floor? The Speaker. The Chair thinks not. Mr. McComas. There is, then, simply a right to make the motion, without any accompanying privilege? The Speaker. The Chair thinks the gentleman in charge of the bill is entitled to the control of it until some action of the House, shows that in its judgment the opposition should assume control. Mr. Cannon. I will yield to the gentleman from Maryland five min- utes, if he desires it, after which I hope to move the previous question. Mr. McComas. There are other gentlemen, I believe, who wish to be heard. Mr. Canpuier, of Massachusetts. I wish to have a few moments. Mr. McComas. Mr. Speaker, my proposition is this: That either we ought to have no park at all by the action of Congress, or if Congress undertakes to make a park of living animals, as an adjunct to the museum of extinct species of animals, both under the same control— the Smithsonian—that the nation, which organizes both, ought to sup- port both. Both ought to be made local or made enema: As the museum of extinct species is national, the living species of animals preserved in the park, which is alle to the same scientific object, 1404 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. ought to be owned and controlled by the nation, as in fact it is now. Such as they have now are on Government land over yonder, owned and controlled by the Government, not the land of the District. Mr. McCreary. Will the gentleman yield for a question 4 - Mr. McComas. Ina moment. Such as they have ought to be under the same control; and, under the law which makes this park, the con- trol absolute and exclusive in the land is preserved in the Government of the United States in the act that was passed in the last Congress. That act was forced on the District bill. Mr. J. D. Savers. Will the gentleman yield for a question 4 Mr.-McComas. Presently. It was put on in the Senate; and from the day of its discussion until now, I ask the gentleman from Illinois in charge of this report, if he has been pressed and besieged by petitions or requests of any sort from the people of this District asking the expenditure of this money for this purpose, and to have the park maintained at their expense? Now, in his own time, if he has had that pressure he can say so. Mr. Speaker, in my judgment, it is unjust to require these people to submit to this sort of a charge for an object in which they have no domestic or local concern, and whose only purpose, object, and prov- ince is a national effort to advance science and preserve from extinc- tion the rare species of animals of this country. And in conclusion I say the proper thing to do is to keep it on a national basis or wipe it out altogether. Mr. AnprERsON, of Kansas. Wipe it out. Mr. McComas. The gentleman from Kentucky said he desired to ask a question. I will be glad to answer him now. Mr. Sayers. I would like to ask the gentleman this question: Were not petitions presented and requests made from the citizens of the District of Columbia asking, in the last Congress, for an appropriation for the purchase of the land for this specific purpose 4 Mr. McComas. I, on the committee which ought to have heard of it, happening to be on the subcommittee of the Committee on Appro- priations, which under ordinary practice would have charge of this very bill, if a District matter, have never to my recollection heard of any request from any man or organization of men of this District, or any agitation in the press or otherwise for this matter, and have always believed it to be entirely the result of an effort on the part of the Smithsonian Institution, its officers and Regents, to have the Gen- eral Government do this thing. That is my answer. Mr. Sayers. Your answer, then, refers as well to the present bill as to the former measure for the purchase of the land? Mr. McComas. All I have to say is that I have understood it to be an effort on the part of the Smithsonian Institution itself, and not on the part of the people here. ee ee —————— . FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1405 Mr. Canpier, of Massachusetts. Will the gentleman from Illinois allow me a few minutes? Mr. Cannon. I have promised to yield a few minutes to the gentle- man from Kentucky first, after which I will yield to the gentleman. Mr. McCreary. Mr. Speaker, I am heartily in favor of the motion of the gentleman from Illinois [Mr. Cannon]. I believe we ought to insist upon the amendment offered by the gentleman from Illinois. The original act passed by Congress—and that was the question I sought to ask the gentleman from Maryland Mr. McComas. And I offered to answer it. Mr. McCreary. The original act passed by Congress with respect to the establishment of the park provided that one half of the money should be furnished by the District of Columbia and the other half by the Government of the United States. Mr. McComas. I will answer that. Mr. McCreary. I was not asking the gentleman any question. Mr. McComas. I thought you tried to get me to answer a question. Mr. McCreary. I was simply stating the proposition a Mr. Cannon. Interrogatively. Mr. McCreary. As that was the original arrangement, and as that was a proper arrangement, I believe we should adhere to it. Now, this same proposition came up a few days ago, and the gentleman from Illinois [Mr. Cannon], in accordance with the original requirement, offered an amendment to carry out that arrangement, to adhere to the © position we took in the beginning, which was that the District of Columbia should furnish one half of the money and the United States the other half. That passed the House by a vote of 114, with only 18 against it. Then this bill goes over to the Senate, and there the Senate seek to make the United States pay the full amount. Now, Mr. Speaker, that is going back upon the original arrange- ment, if we are to have a Zoological Park. Iam one of those not in favor of that Zoological Park. I do not think we came here to legis- late for the purpose of furnishing homes for monkeys, zebras, and lions, but rather to legislate for the white people and the people at large. Mr. McComas. And for the colored people. Mr. McCreary. I said for the people at large. I say we came here to legislate for the people—white people, colored people, and all the people. A Member. And saddle colored. Mr. McCreary. But we did not come here to legislate for monkeys. Now, Mr. Speaker, I see no reason why this House should go back upon the position which it took before, and I hope the House will adhere to and insist upon this amendment. It is right, and if it does insist on its proposition as to this Zoological Park, let it be strangled. I applaud and indorse the position taken by the gentleman from Illinois. 1406 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. " The Speaker. The gentléman will suspend for‘a moment. Unless demonstration ceases in the gallery, the Chair will order the gallery - cleared. Mr. McCreary. I want to say, Mr. Speaker, that I for one am tired of the propositions that come in here seeking in a covert way to get the United States committed to build these parks and gardens. If fair propositions are brought here I am ready to support them. If they come in here and ask us to furnish half the money and we agree to do so, and they to furnish the other half, then we should stand up to the proposition we have made and adhere to it. Jam not in favor of lay- ing out beautiful parks to increase the value of the property of those _ men who happen to have property in the suburbs of this beautiful city. [Here the hammer fell. ] The Speaker. The time of the gentleman from Kentucky has expired. Mr. Cannon. I now yield five minutes to the gentleman from Massa- chusetts [Mr. Candler], and then I will move the previous question. Mr..Canpuer, of Massachusetts. Mr. Speaker, when the chairman of the committee made his motion here he quoted the number of mem- bers that were in favor of his proposition in the last discussion and the small minority against it. Sometimes truth is found where ‘‘two or three are gathered together.” I believe that the Senate is right in the legislation which they propose. There is some contention as to how this came here. 1 take the legislation as it stands to-day. Some gen- tlemen have suggested that they do not believe in zoological gardens and other scientific developments of that kind. Ido. I believe in the Smithsonian Institution and the Museum and everything of that kind in connection with the United States Government. They educate the people, and they have been a blessing to the people; and more than that, these institutions have been so conducted that they are a credit to the United States. And for one, if we are to continue these insti- tutions and extend and enlarge the National Museum, I believe in con- tinuing the management under the Smithsonian Institution, and not change it so as to put it partially under the charge of the District of Columbia, or to tax the people of this District to pay for it. I am in favor of every measure that in an economical and proper way tends to elevate, educate, and instruct the American people; and this city of Washington is a city that must continually receive aid from the Government and be benefited from what the Government has inaugurated here. Mr. Speaker, I am opposed to the principle involved in this legisla- tion. Ido not believe in the Government having a copartnership in these museums for art and science in this District of Columbia I do not believe in burdening this city with a continuing appropriation FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1407 from year to year in which they have no voice to say what that amount shall be. I believe that the American people in some previous Con- gresses have initiated this measure and desire to have it carried out in an economical way; and when I heard the statement of the chair- man of the Appropriations Committee, appealing, it seems to me, rather to the prejudices of this House, that this was substantially in favor of legislation for the men who dodge from taxes in Washington, I can only say that his experience is different from mine, and I consider it an exaggerated statement. I believe that some of the American people have selected the city of Washington on account of its beauty, on account of its climate, and on account of the advantages it affords them, but that the number of rich men that come here to dodge taxes is so insignificant that it is not worthy to be introduced to create a preju- dice in the minds of this House. I would rather remember this, Mr. Speaker, that the city of Wash- ington to-day and in the future is to be the home of great numbers of families that should not be burdened with heavy taxes. We should endeavor to provide and legislate with the view that these men in the Departments, with their families, should have every advantage that it is possible to have without a large expenditure of money. If this was for the schools of the District, if it concerned the people in a regular and a proper appropriation for the municipality, I should then say defeat the amendment of the United States Senate; but-if this great Government, representing 60,000,000 of people, proposes to extend the Smithsonian Museum, let the Government do it. Some gentleman the other day in the debate upon this floor stated that his constituency had only a small comparative interest in the matter. It is not the constituency of any single district in this Union. It represents the constituents of the whole, of all of the districts, and when you take the aggregate we can well see that the American people have a larger interest than a single city like Washington. It is too large and ina different form, a different kind of an appropriation from those we should make continuing from year to year in a district or city like this. It is $78,000 to-day; it may be $100,000 next year. And every man who is familiar with this city, without any manufactures to tax, knows that it is a place where many of very moderate means locate with their families, where numbers of retired officers make their homes, and they should not be burdened with heavy taxation, and you should not tax this city, with its requirements for new streets, for its schools, for developing these institutions that are to educate the people of the nation under direction and sole control of the Govern- ment of the United States. I hope we shall agree with the Senate. [Here the hammer fell. ] The Speaker. The time of the gentleman has expired. Mr. Cannon. Now, Mr. Speaker, I ask for the previous question, 1408 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. with the understanding that if the House insists and does not ask for a conference, without the further instruction of the House that ends it. The previous question was ordered. - The question was taken on the motion that the House insist upon its amendment, and the Speaker declared that the ayes seemed to have it. Mr. Bayne. I ask for a division. > The House divided; and there were-—ayes 118, noes 27. So the motion to insist was agreed to. April 22, 1890—Senate. Mr. J. S. Morritu. I ask permission to make a report from a com- mittee of conference. The Vicr-Presipent (Mr. Levi P. Mokrton). The report will be received and read. The Curer CLERK read the report. (See April 12, 1890—House.) Mr. Morriu. The difference between the two Houses is in relation to the expenditure on the part of the District. The House made an amendment to our bill putting one-half of the expenditure on the Dis- trict of Columbia. I have ascertained that the vote in the House in the first instance was only 18 for the Senate provision, and they have taken the question again and there were only 28, and therefore I ask that we recede from our disagreement and concur with the House amendment. - It is the only method in which we can get the bill passed. Mr. Joun J. Incatus. Mr. President, I think that should not be done without further deliberation by the Senate. While it is notin | order to refer to the votes in either House as a means of affecting the judgment of the other, it is undoubtedly true that the sentiment of the Senate was practically unanimous, and it seems to me that it is an obvious and a flagrant and glaring injustice to compel the people of this District to bear one-half of the expenses involved in this under- taking. They might just as well be called upon to’bear one-half the expense of the National Museum, of the Smithsonian Institution, or any other of our national exhibitions and museums here; and therefore, before the subject is passed upon, I hope there may be some further expression on the part of the Senate. Mr. Morritu. I hope not, Mr. President. I am quite satisfied that with the temper of the House it is utterly impossible to get the bill through there in any other shape. — If the land itself had been origi- nally bought and paid for by the United States instead of one-half of it by the District, then perhaps without that precedent we might have. carried the latter proposition for the expense of conducting it, being entirely assumed by the United States; but it is already late. It is important that the park should be fitted for the introduction of the animals. Buildings, and houses, and fences, and roads are to be made. FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1409 I am absolutely certain that there is no possibility of getting the bill through at all unless we consent to the amendment of the House. Mr. Jonn R. McPuerson. May I ask the Senator from Vermont what is the amount of appropriation carried by the bill? Mr. Morritz. Ninety-two thousand dollars is the whole amount, I believe. One-half of it will be paid by the District. Mr. Ineatis. There is certainly more than that involved. Mr. Morritu. No; there is not. Mr. Ineatis. What was the amount of the purchase? Mr. Morrity. Two hundred thousand dollars. Mr. Ineatrs. One-half of that is to be paid by the Government, and one-half by the District? Mr. Morrixu. [| think so. Mr. Ineauts. I think that is a mistake. The Vicr-PrestpENtT. The question is on the motion of the Senator from Vermont that the Senate recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the House, and agree to the amendment made by the House of Representatives to the Senate bill. Mr. McPuerson. I do not think the Senate entirely understand this question. Certainly I do not. I now wish to inquire as to the appropriation of money made for the purchase of the land. Was the Government to pay one-half of that cost and the District of Columbia the other half? Mr. Morrixu. I so understand it. Mr. McPuerson. I did not so understand it. I understand the cost was to be entirely defrayed by the Government Treasury. Mr. Wituiam B. Attison. I will say to the senator, I have the District of Columbia bill of last year before me— For the establishment of a Zoological Park in the District of Columbia, $200,000, to be expended under and in accordance with the provisions following; that is to say— One-half the expenses to be paid by the District of Columbia. Mr. McPuerson. What was the amount of the appropriation ? Mr. Axuison. Two hundred thousand dollars. In the bill now under consideration there is an extension of this amount to the District for twenty-five years. Mr. J. SuHerMAn. The second section of the bill now pending here provides for apportioning this one-half to the District of Columbia into twenty-five equal annual payments. I hope that when we reach the second section of the District appropriation bill we shall amend it, so as to declare that the District of Columbia should pay no part of the cost of this Zoological Park. It would more properly come up for consideration on the very bill we have before us. I hope there- fore that the Senate will recede from its position so far as the first year’s expenses are concerned. All that is involved in this bill is the H. Doc. 732——89 1410 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. expenditures to be made this year in preparing the park for the pur- pose for which it is designed. Mr. Incatrs. The bill is not long. JI should like to hear it read, Mr. President. The Vick-PresipENtT. The bill will be read. The Cuter Cierk read bill (S. 2284) as it passed the Senate. That there be, and hereby is, appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the organization, improvement, and maintenance of the National Zoological Park, to be expended under the direction of the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, the following sums of money: For the shelter of animals, $15,000. For shelter-barns, cages, fences, and inclosures, and other provisions for the custody cf animals, $9,000. For repairs to the Holt mansion, to make the same suitable for occupancy, and for office furniture, $2,000. For the creation of artificial ponds and other provisions for aquatic animals, $2,000. For water supply, sewerage, and drainage, $7,000. For roads, walks, and bridges, $15,000. For miscellaneous supplies, materials, and sundry incidental expenses not other- wise provided for, $5,000. For current expenses, including the maintenance of collections, food supplies, sal- aries of all necessary employees, and the acquisition and transportation of specimens, $37,000. Src. 2. That the National Zoological Park is hereby placed under the direction of the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, who are authorized to transfer to it any living specimens, whether of animals or plants, now or hereafter in their charge, to accept gifts for the park at their discretion, in the name of the United States, to make exchanges of specimens, and to administer the said Zoological Park for the advance- ment of science and the instruction and recreation of the people. Src. 3. That the heads of Executive Departments of the Government are hereby authorized and directed to cause to be rendered all necessary and practicable aid to the said Regents in the acquisition of collections for the Zoological Park. Amendments of the House: Page 1, in lines 3 and 4 of the bill, strike out the words ‘‘ there be, and hereby is, appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated,’”’ and insert ‘‘the one-half of the following sums named, respectively, is hereby appropri- ated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, and the other half out of the revenues of the District of Columbia.’’ Page 1, line 7, strike out all after the word ‘‘Institution,’’ and in lieu thereof insert ‘‘and to be drawn on their requisition and disbursed by the disbursing officer for said Institution.”’ Mr. Ineatus. Mr. President, the government of this District is an absolute despotism, but I do not think that I ever knew of an illustra- tion of more perfect tyranny than is evinced by that provision in this bill. The people of the District of Columbia have absolutely nothing whatever to do with that park or with its maintenance or its manage- ment. It is to be under the control of the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. The people of the District have no representation on the board, no connection with its management, no disposition whatever of the finances which are to be appropriated and disbursed. FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1411 The Senator from Vermont speaks about the precedent already es- tablished. If there has been one established, which I do not know— of course I am bound to accept his statement—it was a most pernicious precedent, and if we allow this one to be established there will be no escape from it hereafter. They can then plead that the money for the original investment having been shared by the District, and the money for the first annual appropriation having been shared by the District, it has crystallized and passed into the form of law, and can not be changed. How far this expenditure will extend nobody can tell. It may go into the millions. It will go into the millions. It is to be a great national institution, and I protest in the name of the people here against imposing upon them this invidious and unjust and unnecessary burden in addition to what they already endure. Mr. Morr. I shall be quite ready to vote for refunding this to the District any time hereafter, but I consider the necessity now for the passage of the bill in its present shape as very great. So far as the Regents and the officers of the Smithsonian are concerned, they will perform all their duties without any charge so far as the conduct of the Zoological Park is concerned. Mr. F. M. Cocxrett. I hope the conference report will be agreed to. We never heard a solitary word in the Senate Chamber about the people of the United States assuming the burden of this Zoological Park when the bill was passed. The District was only too glad to get the bill through appropriating $200,000—$100,000 to be paid by the people of the United States and the other $100,000 by the District— and it is not until after the ground has been purchased and the park established that the claim is brought in here that the people of the United States must assume the whole burden of the matter. The people of the District wanted it; they sought for it. At their instance Congress passed the bill authorizing the purchase of this park for $200,000, one-half to be paid by the District and the other half by the United States of America. As I understand it, there was no op- position to it at that time, and now the effort is being made to saddle the whole thing on the taxpayers of the United States. Mr. M. C. Burter. May I ask the Senator whether this is a District institution that is to be established any more than a public building in St. Louis, Mo., belongs to the city of St. Louis. Why should the city of St. Louis be required to pay one-half the expense because the public building is put up there? . Mr. Cockreu. This is for the convenience of the people of the District of Columbia nine hundred and ninety-nine times more than for the people of the United States. Not one in ten thousand, not one in a hundred thousand, of the great mass of the taxpayers of the United States will ever see this park; and it is for the beautifying of the city of Washington; it is for the increase of the value of property here, 1412 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. and for the benefit of the citizens who reside here and who will fre- quent it. Mr. Butter. So would the public building in St. Louis be for the entire benefit of the people of St. Louis and no other portion of the American Union; and yet I suppose they would think it a great hard- ship if St. Louis should be called upon to pay half the expense of the court-house and post-office building there. I do not understand that the District of Columbia has anything to do with this public park more than that it is within the limits of the District of Columbia. It isa Government institution which all the people have a right to get the benefit of, not alone the people of the District; and it would seem to me to be a very great hardship to require the District of Columbia to pay one-half of the expense of the park which is intended solely as a national affair. The Vick-PRESIDENT. The question is on the motion made by the Senator from Vermont [Mr. Morrill]. Mr. Incatus. The Senator from Missouri suggests that this is the first time that the claim has ever been heard that the people of the Dis- trict ought not to pay a moiety of this expenditure. It appears that the appropriation was made on the deficiency appropriation bill which was signed on the 2d day of March, 1889, and I presume it was brought in here by the Appropriations Committee at the close of the session, that being, I believe, the last appropriation bill brought in. Mr. Axtison. It was in the regular District of Columbia appropria- tion bill. Mr. Ineatis. The Senator from Iowa informs me it was provided for in the District of Columbia appropriation bill, but it was signed on the 2d day of March. Mr. CockrEtu. But it had been passed long before then. Mr. Ineatts. It could not have been passed long before that time. Mr. Cockretu. It had been passed by the Senate long before, and was in conference. Mr. Ineatts. I do not remember personally any time when the sub- ject was ever brought directly to the attention of the Senate. There- fore, it seems to me that the suggestion of the Senator from Missouri is not properly to be applied to the consideration of this question. I move that the Senate still further insist upon its disagreement to the House amendments, if that is the proper motion. Mr. Cuttom. I think the motion made by the Senator from Ver- mont takes precedence. Mr. Morritz. I think my motion must first be put. Mr. Ineatts. Oh, yes; that is right. The VicE-PRESIDENT. The question is on the motion of the Senator from Vermont that the Senate recede from its disagreement and agree to the amendments made by the House of Representatives to the bill. FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 14138 Mr. Morritu. I ask for the yeas and nays. Mr. Cocxretu. Let us have the yeas and nays. Mr. Morr. It is entirely useless to have another conference. The yeas and nays were ordered. Mr. C. J. FaAuLKNER. I understand the question is on the motion of the Senator from Vermont to recede from our disagreement to the amendments of the House. The Vick-PRESIDENT. It is; and to agree to the amendments made by the House to the Senate bill. Mr. S. M. Cuttom. Mr. President Mr. P. B. Puump. If this question is to be debated any further, | shall certainly interpose an objection. I gave way on the supposition that it would be strictly a formal matter. Mr. Morritu. I did not suppose it would be debated. Mr. Cuttom. I simply desire to say that I was against the amend- ment attached to the bill by the other House because I believed with other Senators here that this was a Government affair and ought to be conducted and paid for by the Government, but I am so anxious to get something done in this respect that I am inclined to favor the motion of the Senator from Vermont and will vote that the Senate shall concur in the House amendment. Mr. R. L. Greson. I am as much opposed to the House amendment as any Senator here. I think it is a great injustice to the people of this District to tax them with the cost of half of the park or the cost of equipping the park or imposing any tax whatever with respect to the park; but I shall vote to concur in the House amendment because it is the best we can get under the circumstances. Mr. J. C. Spooner. I do not intend to debate this matter, but I desire to say as a member of the conference committee that it is, in my opinion, absolutely useless to order another conference. From what took place I am entirely satisfied that the other House will not yield on this question, and it means this proposition or no bill. Mr. H. L. Dawes. When this matter was before the Senate at first I stated my view, that I was in favor of relieving the District from its share of this burden. I am still of that opinion, and I should vote against the motion of the Senator from Vermont were it not for the statements which he and the other conferees have made to the Senate and what we all know has transpired elsewhere. It is necessary, in my opinion, in order to obtain the passage of the bill, that we should recede; and therefore, without changing my opinion as to the justice of the matter, I shall vote to recede. Mr. McPuerson. There seems to be a consensus of opinion here in the minds of Senators who have spoken upon this question that it is a very great injustice that you propose to visit this expense upon the taxpayers of the city of Washington, who have no representative on 1414 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. this floor, who have no vote in this District; but rather than lose this great animal show we propose to vote to fix this injustice upon the people of the District. That is practically the question, and nothing else. It is to establish a precedent for all time in which we are to deal with the unrepresented people of this great city. It is well known to every Senator here that the expenditure incurred for years in this District with respect to opening, grading, paving, and sewering streets has been simply enormous. They have been just putting in a new water supply which has entailed a large expense upon the people of the city. Now, I have no objection whatever to voting an appropriation of money for the purchase of land, because the meaning of that is that it can be converted into a public park and will be of interest to the people of the city of Washington as much as it will be to the Govern- ment itself; but the Government proposes here in the city of Wash- ington, of its own volition, without ever consulting the wishes of a taxpayer in this city touching it, to establish a great national show of animals. So far as I am concerned, I do not think this zoological garden is a good thing for the city of Washington, anyway. It is proposed to impose that tax upon the people of this city in addition to other taxes imposed without consulting them at all, and I shall vote against the whole scheme. I should infinitely rather see the measure go by the board entirely than to establish any such precedent. The Vicr-PREsIDENT. The question is on the motion of the Senator from Vermont, on which the yeas and nays have been ordered. ~ The Secretary proceeded to call the roll. Mr. W. Catt (when his name was called). Iam paired with the Sen- ator from South Dakota [Mr. Pettigrew]. If there be no objection, however, this not being a political question, I will vote ‘‘ nay.” Mr. Morr. There is no objection. Mr. McPuerson (when his name was called). I am paired with the Senator from Delaware [Mr. Higgins]. I do not see him in his seat. If he were present, I should vote ‘‘ nay.” Mr. C. F. Manprerson (when his name was called). Iam paired with the Senator from Kentucky [Mr. Blackburn], and therefore abstain from voting. Mr. S. Pasco (when his name was called). Iam paired with the Sen- ator from Illinois [Mr. Farwell]. In his absence I withhold my vote. Mr. D. Turrre (when his name was called). I am paired with the senior Senator from Minnesota [Mr. Davis]. The roll-call was concluded. Mr. E. C. Warrnaty. My colleague [Mr. George] is absent in attendance upon a committee, and is paired with the Senator from New Hampshire [Mr. Blair]. FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1415 The result was announced—yeas 33, nays 20; as follows: Yeras.—Aldrich, Allen, Berry, Chandler, Cockrell, Coke, Colquitt, Cullom, Dawes, Dixon, Evarts, Gibson, Gorman, Gray, Jones of Nevada, Morgan, Morrill, Payne, Pierce, Platt, Plumb, Power, Pugh, Quay, Reagan, Sanders, Sherman,Spooner, Stewart, Stockbridge, Voorhees, Washburn, Wilson of Maryland—33. Nays.—Allison, Barbour, Bate, Blodgett, Butler, Call, Casey, Eustis, Faulkner, Hale, Hampton, Harris, Hawley, Ingalls, McMillan, Moody, Teller, Vance, Walthall, Wilson of lowa—20. Axssent.—Beck, Blackburn, Blair, Brown, Cameron, Daniel, Davis, Dolph, Ed- munds, Farwell, Frye, George, Hearst, Higgins, Hiscock, Hoar, Jones of Arkansas, Kenna, McPherson, Manderson, Mitchell, Paddock, Pasco, Pettigrew, Ransom, Saw- yer, Squire, Stanford, Turpie, Vest, Wolcott. So the Senate receded from its disagreement to the amendments of the House. April 30, 1890. Be it enacted, etc., That the one half of the following sums named, respectively, is hereby appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, and the other half out of the revenues of the District of Columbia, for the organization, improvement, and maintenance of the National Zoological Park, to be expended under the direction of the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, and to be drawn on their requisition and disbursed by the disbursing officer for said Institution: For the shelter of animals, $15,000. For shelter-barns, cages, fences, and inclosures, and other provisions for the custody of animals, $9,000. For repairs to the Holt mansion, to make the same suitable for occupancy, and for office furniture, $2,000. For the creation of artificial ponds and other provisions for aquatic animals, $2,000. For water supply, sewerage, and drainage, $7,000. For roads, walks, and bridges, $15,000. For miscellaneous supplies, materials, and sundry incidental expenses not otherwise provided for, $5,000. For current expenses, including the maintenance of collections, food supplies, salaries of all necessary employees, and the acquisition and transportation of specimens, $37,000. Src. 2. That the National Zoological Park is hereby placed under the directions of the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, who are authorized to transfer to it any living specimens, whether of animals or plants, now or hereafter in their charge, to accept gifts for the park at their discretion, in the name of the United States, to make exchanges of specimens, and to administer the said Zoological Park for the advancement of science and the instructien and recreation of ' the people. 1416 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Src. 8. That the heads of Executive Departments of the Government are hereby authorized and directed to cause to be rendered all neces- sary and practicable aid to the said Regents in the acquisition of collections for the Zoological Park. (Stat., XX VI, 78.) January 7, 1891—House. Mr. Bengamin A. ENLOE introduced a resolution: Resolved, That the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution be, and they are hereby, requested and directed to furnish to the House of Representatives a detailed and itemized statement of the expenditures which have been made from the appropria- tion provided in the act approved April 30, 1890, entitled ‘‘An act for the organiza- tion, improvement, and maintenance of the National Zoological Park;’’ and they are further directed and requested to report whether or not any of the land purchased for park purposes has been reserved from the public, or set apart for scientific or other purposes than those for the Zoological Park; also to report whether or not any part of the said appropriation has been expended in violation of the provisions of said act. Referred to Committee on Expenditures in the Interior Department. January 27, 1891—House. Mr. Bengamin A. ENLOE introduced a resolution: Resolved, That the Secretary of the Treasury be requested to inform the House of Representatives whether or not the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution have accepted the trust imposed by the act approved April 20, 1890, entitled ‘‘An act for the organization, improvement, and maintenance of the National Zoological Park,’’ and to report by what legal authority the Treasury Department has paid out that portion of the appropriation made by said act, which has been expended up to and including the 27th day of January, 1891. Referred to Committee on Expenditures in the Treasury Department. * * * * * * * Mr. ENLOE called up resolution introduced on January 7, 1891. The Speaker. Upon what ground does the gentleman make that a question of privilege? Mr. Enxor. I call it a privileged question on the ground that the resolution has been introduced a sufficient length of time to make it privileged, it being an inquiry addressed to the Regents of the Smith- sonian Institution. The matter has been before the Committee on Expenditures in the Interior Department, and the committee agreed to report a resolution striking out the portion of the resolution as read which calls for an itemized statement of the expenditures. The Speaker. The rule applies only to resolutions of inquiry addressed to the heads of Executive Departments. Mr. Entor. On that point, Mr. Speaker, I desire to say that the reason why the resolution was framed as it is and also the reason why I consider this as presenting a question of privilege is because it is addressed to the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, who are made trustees for the disbursement of this fund and for the organization of this park, and are not under the control of any Department of the Gov- ernment. FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1417 The Speaker. ‘‘ Heads of Executive Departments” is the language of the rule. Mr. Entor. I understand; but the Regents of the Smithsonian are not under the jurisdiction of any Department of the Government. A Member. And consequently do not come under the rule. Mr. Entor. They are virtually the head of a Department, and I should think they come within the meaning of the rule. The Speaker. They are not heads of any Executive Department. Mr. Entor. Furthermore, I will state that on yesterday morning - the gentleman from Massachusetts, the chairman of the Committee on Expenditures in the Interior Department [Mr. Banks], told me that he would bring the matter up and that the Speaker had agreed that it should be brought up and considered this morning. Upon that ground I passed it over yesterday morning, and I would like to have it disposed of now, because the Regents meet to-morrow. The Speaker. The gentleman from Massachusetts [Mr. Banks] did speak to the Chair with regard to it, and the fault, if there be any, is not his. The Chair was not aware that the matter would come up now. There is apparently some misunderstanding; but the Chair makes this statement so that the gentleman from Massachusetts may be exonerated from any responsibility for it. Mr. Enxtorz. Dol understand the Chair to hold that this is not a privileged resolution 4 The Speaker. The Chair does not see how it comes under the priv- ilege for which the rule provides. Mr. Entor. Then I will ask the Chair, to whom should such a reso- lution of inquiry be addressed in order to make this a privileged matter? What department has jurisdiction of the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution 4 The Speaker. The Chair could not tell that without some investi- gation. Mr, Entor. J admit that this does not come within the rule tech- nically, but there is no other way to get the information than by addressing the inquiry directly to the Regents. I ask that the reso- lution be considered now. It will take but a few minutes. ‘The Speaker. The Chair thinks it is clearly not one of the cases contemplated by the rule, and the Speaker resumed the chair while a division was going on because he saw that the gentleman temporarily occupying the chair had not talked with the gentleman from Tennes- see on the subject. If the gentleman can at any time show that this is a question of privilege, the Chair will entertain his motion at the proper time, but at present there does not seem to be any foundation laid for it. Mr. Entor. Then at some other time the Chair will listen to an argument on the question of its being privileged ? be Seovae CONGRESS.ONAL PROCEEDINGS. The Speaker. At any time that the gentleman will show that this is a question of privilege the Chair will do his best to entertain the gentleman’s motion. Mr. Entor. I want to give a little attention to the matter which I attempted to bring before the House this morning. I introduced a resolution some time in the early part of the month, calling upon the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution for certain information in regard to the management of the Zoological Park. Congress at its last session appropriated the sum of $92,000 for the organization, maintenance, and improvement of the National Zoological Park, and I find, according to the precedents that have been established, and I believe under the terms of the act, it was necessary and proper that the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution should assume that trust and devise ways and means to execute it, or vest the authority some where to use the appropriation in accordance with the direction of Congress. Iam informed that the Board of Regents have not had a meeting since the passage of that act; that it has never assumed the trust; that the money appropriated has not so far been expended by due authority of law. I think it is clear that no one had the right to draw one dollar of the money from the Treasury and expend it with- out the direction of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institu- tion. Mr. 8S. L. Minurken. Let me ask the gentleman who has drawn the money and expended it? Mr. Entor. I answer the gentleman’s question by saying I under- ‘stand that Mr. Langley, the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, has drawn the money and has expended it as he saw proper in the improvement of the park. Mr. MitxrKken. One other question for information. How could he do that if there has been no authorization by law for it to be done in that way 4 Mr. Entor. I will call the gentleman’s attention torthe language of the act appropriating this money, and also to a precedent which I . think covers the case exactly. Section 2, of the act approved April 30, for the organization and ‘maintenance of the National Zoological Park, provided that the ‘‘ said park is hereby placed under the direc- tion of the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, who are authorized to transfer to itany living specimens, whether of animals or plants, now or hereafter in their charge, to accept gifts for the park at their dis cretion in the name of the United States, and to make exchange of specimens, and to administer the said Zoological park for the advance- ment of science and the instruction and recreation of the people.” Now, I find that in 1879 when Congress passed an act providing for the establishment of the National Museum it was provided that a fire- proof building should be erected for the use of the National Museum FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1419 under the direction and supervision of the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, etc. When that act was passed the Board of Regents accepted the trust and appointed a board or commission to supervise the construction of the building and to see that it was constructed in accordance with the plans and specifications, to subserve the purposes had in view by Congress in establishing the Museum. Every dollar of the money that was appropriated and expended was expended under the direction of that board or commission. All this you will find in the Smithsonian report for 1879. Now, when Congress passed the act providing for the establishment of the National Zoological Park and placed the park under the control of the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, I hold that not a dollar of that money could be lawfully expended without the acceptance of the trust by the Board of Regents, and that has not been done. In order to bring the matter before the House and get at the facts a little more fully, I have introduced to-day another resolution of inquiry which is addressed to the Secretary of the Treasury, asking him to inform Congress by what authority this money has been expended and whether it has been paid out and expended in accordance with law. Mr. B. M. Curcuron. If the Board of Regents proceeded to admin- ister the trust, would not that be as much an acceptance of it as if they had taken formal action to that effect? Mr. Entor. Certainly, if they proceeded to administer it; but they have had no meeting since the trust was imposed upon them, and therefore they can not have taken any action of that kind. But the Secretary and the executive board have assumed, I suppose, that the Board of Regents, when it did meet, would approve whatever had been done by them. Mr. Miuirken. Let me ask the gentleman why this whole matter should not be taken charge of by the Supervising Architect of the Treasury ? Mr. Entor. I suppose that is governed by the act making the appropriation. No one else is directed or authorized to accept this trust but the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, and they could only carry it forward in pursuance of the designs of Congress. There has been no official acceptance of the trust by the Regents, but the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution has been acting, I suppose, on the assump- tion that his acts would be approved by the board when it met. Now, the board holds its meeting to-morrow, and I wanted to call attention to the matter to-day so that it might be brought to the attention of the board at this meeting. It seems to me that it is a very loose way of doing business to provide a national park and place it under the control of such a body as the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, made up as that is, consisting of the Vice- 1420 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. President, members of Congress, and citizens who reside in distant States, gentlemen who, in my judgment, are about as little fitted, by reason of their positions, for such a trust as anybody could be. My opinion is that members of the board do not know anything about what is done with the money, except as they get the information from the reports of their officers. They have no practical knowledge of the matter committed to them, and they pay little or no attention to what is done. Mr. Miturcen. If it does not take too much of the gentleman’s time, I would like to know what his resolution is which is now before the House. Mr. Entor. The gentleman should understand that there is no res- olution now before the House. Mr. Mirirken. The gentleman seems to be finding fault, and it seems to me that there is something in the fault which he finds, but what remedy does he propose? It seems to me that all this business should be done by the Supervising Architect of the Treasury, and he might be held responsible for it. Mr. Entor. That would require another act of Congress directing that it should be placed under his control. At the time this bill was before Congress great anxiety was manifested to get it disposed of as quickly as possible. A letter on the subject was addressed, I believe, to the gentleman from Maine himself [Mr. Milliken], stating the necessity for early action, so that the animals in the zoo at the Smithsonian Institution might be got away from those pens there and put into this park. Congress was urged to act upon the matter immediately, but I under- stand the.Secretary says there has been so much difficulty in getting title to the land that the accommodations for the animals were still! unprovided, and the animals themselves are still in their pens and are likely to be there during the remainder of the winter. Now, it is a very interesting thing Mr. Mruuiken. I would simply suggest to my friend that if it is proposed to get title to these lands in the same way as has been done in other cases of which I haye some knowledge—by condemnation— the chances are that the animals now existing will be dead by the time the land is acquired, and another generation of animals hereafter to be born will have an opportunity to occupy this park. Mr. Curcuron. The condemnation has been completed. Mr. Entor. I understand that the condemnation proceedings are completed, and that now the title to the property is vested in the Government. The commission appointed to make the purchase has made its final report. Mr. Miiurken. Then this case is contrary to my observations in other cases. FIFTY-FIRST CONGRESS, 1889-1891. 1421 Mr. Cutcuron. The condemnation has been completed, and the balance of the appropriation is going back to the Treasury. Mr. Entor. I was about to say it is a very important matter if we are going into the business of establishing a zoological park or menag- erie that we should have a first-class, respectable place of resort for the people who visit this city. I opposed the original appropriation; I did not like the Government going into the business of raising ani- mals and running a menagerie; but as it has embarked in the business I think the money appropriated by Congress ought to be properly expended. Now, I understand that the park has been inclosed by a picket fence. Ido not think it was the intention of Congress to fence the public out of the park, but that the appropriation for fencing was intended to fence in the animals. That, however, is a matter in which the Secretary has exercised some latitude, claiming that he has good reasons for doing so. But it seems to me that every street or road that is traveled ought to be open, so that the public may drive through this park, and that nothing ought to be shut out or reserved from the public except what is necessary for the protection and preservation of the animals. I have here a list of the animals, which I will publish with my remarks, showing that we have a very expensive menagerie so far as it has gone. We have appropriated $199,614.16 in the first place to buy the property. We have spent $17,000 of the $92,000 appropri- ated last session; and we are asked for $110,000 at this session to pro- ceed with this work and to maintain the zoo. FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. 1567 NATIONAL ZOOLOGICAL PARK—APPROPRIATIONS. February 16, 1892—Senate. Mr. Joun SHERMAN. Before the bill [urgent deficiency bill (H. 5399) | 1s reported to the Senate there is one provision in it that I should like to have read, that in relation to the Zoological Garden, and to call the attention of the Senate to it. The Vicr-PrestpENT (Mr. Levi P. Morton). The part referred to by the Senator from Ohio will be read. National Zoological Park: For care, subsistence, and transportation of animals for the National Zoological Park, and for the purchase of raré specimens not otherwise obtainable, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees and general incidental expenses not otherwise provided for, being a deficiency for the fiscal year 1892, $4,434; to reimburse the Smithsonian fund for assuming the expenses of labor and materials for repairs urgently necessary for the preservation of the Holt mansion, $499.45; in all, $4,933.45; one-half of which sum shall be paid from the revenues of the District of Columbia and the other half from the Treasury of the United States. Mr. SHERMAN. Does the provision about the payment of one-half the expenses apply to the Zoological Garden? Mr. Euerenre Hate. Yes, that applies to the Zoological Garden. Mr. SHermaAn. That question ought to be met, and I think it ought to be met now. It seems to me it is an act of gross injustice to the people of this District, who are getting to be pretty heavily taxed, to have to pay one-half of the expenses of the Zoological Garden. I think this is about as good a time as any to make the question whether it is right and just that the expenses of the Zoological Garden, the creature of the United States, belonging as much to the people of one State as another, certainly as much as to the people of the District of Colum- bia, should be required to be paid one-half by the people of the Dis- trict. I have no doubt it will be a somewhat expensive toy to the people of the United States, but is it right, is it just, to take from the limited means of the people of the District of Columbia to pay for this thing? It is not in any sense a part of the government of this District. It is admitted on all hands that the city of Washington, a city of 200,000 inhabitants, is totally unable to maintain a zoological garden. The city of London can do it, the city of Paris can do it, and some other cities have undertaken the task, but most of them have made failures. The great cities of the world which maintain zoological gardens for the instruction and for the interest of the inhabitants of the empire to which those cities belong are very large and very wealthy; but to charge one-half of this expense—and an expense constantly growing and increasing—upon the District is unjust. The Government estab- lishes this entirely under its own management. The Commissioners of the District have nothing to do with it. We have an organized force for the purpose of maintaining and caring for it. I hope now the Senate will at least take the ground that it will not put this expense 1568 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. upon the District of Columbia, upon the few people here. Let it be borne by the people of the United States, where it will be a very small addition to their burden, while to the people of the District it might be a very serious one before it goes very far. Mr.. Hate. Does the Senator from Ohio move to strike out the clause ? Mr. Suerman. I move to strike out so much as relates to the Dis- taict of Columbia paying one-half for the Zoological Garden. Mr. Hate. The committee in reporting this bill has taken no new ground on the subject. The provision that is found at the end of the amendment which obliges the District to pay half of the bills for the running of the Zoological Garden is the present law, the present rule, and all action in regard to that park was taken deliberately in the ae Congress. It was discussed most fully. Mr. SuermMan. This is a mere limitation in an appropriation bill. Mr. Hatz. Of course it can be changed at any time. It is law so far as appropriations have been made heretofore and which did not pass sub silentio. It was thoroughly debated here and in the other branch during the Fifty-first Congress, and the deliberate decision of Congress was that this park was so largely for the benefit of citizens of Washington, for the benefit of the taxpayers of Washington and their families, that the most which should be asked of the General Government was that it should pay one-half of the bills and the Dis- trict the other half. I suppose, Mr. President, that the agitation for the erinehalld of this property, the movement which resulted finally in its purchase, and the setting it up as a great institution and a great feature of Wash- ington, came largely from the citizens of the District. But I do not choose to go largely into that question now, only saying to the Senate that the Committee on Appropriations has sim- ply followed in the line that was set for it in the last Congress, and it is for the Senate to decide now. It is a question upon which a good deal, as Roger de Coverley remarked, can be said on both sides, and which side has the better of the bargain I am not certain, for one, but we do not want to open it, we do not want to attempt to countervail what the House of Representatives has done, and the Senate has done, and the law has done, and raise a conflict upon it, and therefore it seems to me that under present conditions it is better to let the clause stand as itis. If the question is to come up, let it be investi- gated by the District committee or whatever other committee can give more time to it, and make a fixed policy, if any new policy is needed. Mr. J. 8. Morriiz. Mr. President, I desire to correct a statement of the Senator from Maine in one respect. The bill for the estab- lishment of the Zoological Park was reported from the Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds, and so far as I know no citizen of this District appeared before that committee or any of its members in AE SE FIFTY-SECOND CONGRAKSS, 1891-1893. 1569 relation toit. It was a conception of the late Senator from Kentucky, Mr. Beck, and the Senator from Vermont, Mr. Edmunds, who orig- inated the idea of having a park, and neither of them, I am very sure, ever expected that it would be anything but a national park. Mr. Hate. This is what was done last year: . For care, subsistence, and transportation of animals for the National Zoological Park, and for the purchase of rare specimens not otherwise obtainable, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, and general incidental expenses not otherwise provided for, $17,500— Including previous appropriations for this purpose— in all, $50,500, one-half of which sum shall be paid from the revenues of the District of Columbia and the other half from the Treasury of the United States. The Committee on Appropriations has simply followed that lan- guage in terms in describing the appropriations, the objects for which they are made, and the sources from which the money shall be derived. Mr. Wriu1am M. Stewart. I fully concur with the views expressed by the Senator from Ohio, and also with the views expressed by the Senator from Vermont, that this park was originated as a national park and should be maintained by the General Government. But I will suggest to them that this is an urgent deficiency bill, and the items charged to the District are very small in this bill. It is very necessary to have the money appropriated by this bill for use at the earliest possible moment, as there are animals there that must be fed. To raise this question now, which has been so much debated in both Houses of Congress, will delay the bill and defeat its object. I think we had better let it pass and take up that question when it can be con- sidered more deliberately and considered on some other bill where the question will properly come up. Mr. Hae. On a general bill making larger appropriations? Mr. Srewart. Yes; this isan urgent deficiency bill for immediate use. Ido not think it is worth while to delay its passage to dispose of this question. Mr. Witiram A. Perrer. Is there an amendment proposed to a par- ticular clause in the bill now? The Vick-PRrEsIDENT. The Chair understood the Senator from Ohio to move an amendment. Mr. Prerrer. I thought it was a mere suggestion. I wish to offer an amendment to another part of the bill. Mr. J. H. Berry. I should like to hear read the amendment offered by the Senator from Ohio. The Vice-Prestipent. The amendment will be stated. The Secretary. On page 4, line 17, after the word ‘‘ cents,’ proposed to strike out: ? Ties One-half of which sum shall be paid from the revenues of the District of Colum- bia, and the other half from the Treasury of the United States. i Doc: 132 99 1570 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Mr. SHerman. In view of what has been said by the Senator from Nevada [Mr. Stewart], I do not wish to delay the passage of this bill, which I know is very important and urgent on account of the defi- ciency in regard to the Census Bureau, etc. I withdraw the amend- ment for the present. The question may be raised when the regular appropriation bill comes up, but I hope the Committee on the District of Columbia, which ought to take charge of this matter now—the park hitherto has come from some of the other committees—will be charged with the care and just limitations of the expenses imposed upon the people of this District. I hope that that committee will take it into early consideration whether the whole of this ought not to be stricken out of the law before the regular bill comes before us toward the close of the session. It seems to me that this is-a charge that will be growing more and more every year, as the Zoological Park grows in importance, and the maintenance of this garden may become one of the large charges on the Government. I hope the committee will take that matter into consideration and determine once for all whether this is a just charge against the people of this District. I withdraw the amendment. The Vicr-Presipent. The amendment is withdrawn. March 8, 1892. Deficiency act (special). For care and subsistence of animals for the National Zoological Park, fiscal year 1892, $1,000, one-half of which sum shall be paid from the revenues of the District of Columbia, and the other half from the Treasury of the United States. (Stat., XX VII, 6.) , April 4, 1892—Senate. ° The Vicr-PREsIDENT (Mr. L. P. Morron) presented a letter from the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution (Mis. Doe. 114): SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, Washington, April 2, 1892. Str: In accordance with the instruction of the Regents of the Smithsonian Institu- tion, I have the honor to transmit a resolution passed by them on the 29th of March, 1892, together with the following preliminary statement of the considerations on which it is based: The National Zoological Park was placed under the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution by the act of April 30, 1890, to be administered by them, first, ‘‘ for the advancement of science’’ and, second, ‘‘for the instruction and recreation of the people.” | The necessity of protecting the unexpectedly large crowd of people that have been attracted to the park and of providing for their access to the animals, as well as for the protection of the latter, has made it necessary to assign to this secondary object a disproportionate share of the appropriations, and it seems unavoidable that this subordinate feature should thus claim the larger portion of the expenses, as long as the collections are open to the public, as in ordinary zoological gardens. The appropriations {for the fiscal year 1891-92 were made under three heads: Improvements and care of grounds, $15,000; buildings, $18,000; and maintenance, a FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. 1571 $17,500, these amounts being about one-half those that were submitted to Congress as necessary to make preliminary provision for the security and accessibility of the collections and to administer their trust with safety to the public. The Regents recognized the impossibility of doing this with such means; but, con- sidering that the animals were already in the park, in view of this public safety, and regarding the act as mandatory upon them, they, with the aid of a balance econo- mized in anticipation from the original appropriation made for the organization of the park, and a deficiency item of $1,000, to meet urgent needs, have endeavored to get through the year until relief could be had from Congress. In doing so they have been obliged to reduce the number of watchmen and employees of the park in every grade till the public safety threatens to be endangered, while yet a considerable part of these watchmen have been called on to labor continuously through Sundays and holidays ten to twelve hours a day without extra compensation, and haye in other respects felt obliged to carry economy to a degree which would have been unjustifi- able, except upon compulsion under such circumstances. They would, in their opinion, have been unable to administer the park to the close of the fiscal year, even under these conditions, had they not, in view of the emer- gency, also given without charge the services of officials and employees paid from the private Smithsonian fund. The total expenditure for maintenance during the current year may, under these conditions, be expected to be $23,600. These facts were represented by them through the Secretary of the Institution in a letter dated January 23, 1892, to the Secretary of the Treasury (a copy of which is appended) and by him transmitted to Congress. For the year 1892-93 the following estimates were sent to the Treasury Department: Improvements, $20,000; buildings, $27,000, and maintenance, $26,000. In the sundry civil bill (H. 7520) as now reported to the House of Representa- tives, there is appropriated for improvements $9,000, for buildings $10,000, and for maintenance $10,000; in all, $29,000. If the Regents considered, as they must, $9,000 as inadequate for a year’s expenditure in laying out the roads and grounds in a new park of 167 acres, they yet would not have felt compelled to make this present repre- sentation, since such improvements may await the action of a future Congress; but, under the appropriation for ‘‘ buildings,’’ the security of the animals must be pro- vided for without delay, while under ‘‘ maintenance ’’ come not only their food and warmth, but the protection of the public; and that the case of animals which are helpless to provide for themselves and dangerous if not guarded can not wait future action, has been a pressing consideration to them. The Regents think it proper to remark that the roads of the park in the vicinity of the cages have been crowded with visitors, to the number of as many as 10,000 in a day, before there was time to make any means for the permanent care of the animals, or provide proper roads to get to them, even had the means for these been appropri- ated, and that there is, in their judgment, every reason to expect during the coming . summer the visit of still larger throngs, composed not only of adults but of children. The Regents feel desirous to represent that they can not be held responsible for the imminent danger which must result, under the contemplated withdrawal even of these means for protection which experience has already shown to be absolutely insufficient. They would also ask attention to the fact that small as the appropria- tion is, it is in several items, and that under no emergency is any discretion allowed them as to their relative amounts, although the whole matter of expenditure is here for a novel purpose, on which only experience could decide the relative exigency of each part. If Congress intended that the park must be maintained on the appropriation under which the Regents have been unable to administer it the last year (improve- ment, $15,000; buildings, $18,000; maintenance, $17,500), they deem it reasonable to bring the attention of Congress to the fact that a discretion might properly be exer- cised by them as to what proportion they should apply to the imminent needs of the 1572 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. public safety and what to matters of less urgency, and that they should either be allowed to expend on the part upon which the safety of the public and the existence of the animals especially depends, that which their experience has shown to be indispensable, or that they should be relieved of responsibility for the consequences. They desire to add in further explanation that they do not suppose that with the total appropriation of $50,000, of which $26,000 is for ‘‘maintenance’’ (mentioned in the resolution), the park can be properly conducted, and that they believe this sum to be in fact inadequate for such conduct, their intent being to state to Congress the sum below which, according to their experience, it is impossible to undertake that the park shall be carried on another year, though not creditably, yet without most probable danger. The resolutions are as follows: Resolved, That the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution would respect- fully represent to Congress the impossibility of maintaining the United States National Zoological Park, required by the act of Congress of April 30, 1890, with a less total appropriation than $50,000, of which at least $26,000 will be required for maintenance. . Resolved, That the Secretary of the Institution be requested to communicate this resolution to the President of the Senate and Speaker of the House, with a prelimi- nary statement of the reasons and considerations on which it is based. I have the honor to be, sir, with great respect, your obedient servant, S. P. Lanauery, Secretary. . Hon. Leyr P. Morton, President of the Senate. Referred to Committee on Appropriations. July 28, 1892. Deficiency act for 1892, etc. To pay Melville Lindsay for rubber boots furnished to employees engaged to work in water in the National Zoological Park, being a deficiency for the fiscal year 1891, $38. (Stat., X XVII, 284.) August 5, 1892. Sundry civil act for 1893. For,continuing the construction of roads, walks, bridges, water sup- ply, sewerage, and drainage; and for grading, planting, and otherwise improving the grounds; erecting, and repairing buildings and inclo- sures for animals; and for administrative purposes, care, subsistence, and transportation of animals, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, and general incidental expenses not otherwise provided for, $50,000, one-half of which sum shall be paid from the revenues of the District of Columbia and the other half from the Treasury of the United States; and a report in detail of the expenses on account of the National Zoological Park shall be made to Congress at the beginning of each regular session. (Stat., XX VIT, 360.) January 28, 1893—House. The sundry civil bill for 1894 (H. 10238) under consideration: Mr. Witu1am 8. Hotman. Mr. Chairman, only a word. I sympa- ee ee FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. 1573 thize with my friend from Mississippi generally. I do not like to appropriate money when it does not inure to the benefit of all the people. I admit that there is a very large portion of the population of the United States who will never see the Yellowstone Park; but there has been some sentiment about this matter. Iam in favor of keeping up the Botanical Garden. I have spent very many pleasant hours in going through these trees and shrubs, and I never knew a ~ gentleman on the floor of this House with a flower in his lapel that did not conduct himself properly. I never-saw anyone cavorting up and down the aisles with a flower in his coat. I say that there is some sentiment about this matter. I have often visited that park myself, along with other people, and it is necessary that we should have good roads in that park so that visitors can get through it. Mr. Tuomas R. Srockpae. I would like to ask the gentleman from Indiana a question, if he will permit me. Mr. Houtman. Certainly. Mr. Strocxpate. Is this appropriation of $40,000 a good sentiment? Mr. Horman. Oh, I will come to that. Iam coring to the senti- ment of the proposition ] am going to make. To enable people to visit those curiosities, the Upper Geyser, the Yellowstone Falls, and other objects of extraordinary interest, the roads have to be kept up. When we commenced the appropriations, as I remarked a while ago, the whole amount expended for the roads was about $19,000 a year. Then we had a body of civilians, a superin- tendent, and nineteen watchmen to guard the park. Now we have the military there upon the ground with a company or two of cavalry. So that my friend misapprehends. This money is not for the purpose of protecting those objects of extraordinary interest, perhaps the most remarkable in the world, but for the purpose of constructing and keep- ing in repair the roads through the park. Mr. Benton McMituiy. Are the troops kept there for the purpose of virtually policing the park? Mr. Hoitman. Yes; that is what they are there for. Mr. McMitrrn. Does not my friend think that that is rather an unsoldierly business ? Mr. Hortman. Oh, it is a very pleasant duty. They are not there very long each year. And, Mr. Chairman, instead of this Zoological Park here in Washington buying elephants and other foreign animals, why should we not keep up this great natural park and preserve from utter extinction specimens of the animals, natives of this continent, that once roamed over the plains and hid themselves in the rocks and mountains? Instead of importing and trying to keep alive at great expense these animals from remote regions, let us have a collection of the American animals which are now rapidly disappearing—the bear, the buffalo, the elk 1574 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Mr. J. Stupson. The mugwump. Mr. Hotman. A place where these and other animals can be pre- served, Let us have a park for that purpose, which shall be really national in its character. To that end I believe that an appropriation of $20,000 at this time will be sufficient. I therefore move to strike out ‘‘forty” and insert ‘‘ twenty.” Mr. J. H. BAankKHEAD. Mr. Chairman, I would like to ask the gen- tleman a question. I have no desire to destroy the beauties of this national park, but I will ask the gentleman whether he has any inti- mation as to what amount of money is now to the credit of the com- missioner for the benefit of these improvements ? . March 3, 1893. Sundry civil act for 1894. For continuing the construction of roads, walks, bridges, water sup- ply, sewerage, and drainage; and for grading, planting, and otherwise improving the grounds; erecting, and repairing buildings and inclos- ures for animals; and for administrative purposes, care, subsistence, and transportatidn of animals, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, and general incidental expenses not otherwise provided for, $50,000; one half of which sum shall be paid from the revenues of the District of Columbia and the other half from the Treasury of the United States. (Stat., XX VIT, 582.) NATIONAL MUSEUM—NIGHT OPENING. January 11, 1892—House. Mr. W. H. Crarn introduced bill (H. 2762): Be it enacted, etc., That the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution be, and are hereby, authorized to provide, as soon as possible, for the opening’of the National Museum building and the Museum halls in the Smithsonian Institution until sunset on every day and until 10 postmeridian on at least two days in every week through- out the year; and the sum of $60,000, or such portion thereof as may be necessary, is hereby appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropri- ated, to carry out the provisions of this act, said sum to be expended as follows: For an electric-light plant with engines of at least 225 horsepower and a lighting capacity equivalent to at least 100 2,000-candlepower are lights and 1,000 16-candle- power glow lights, $50,000; the same to be expended under the direction of the Sec- retary of the Smithsonian Institution, who is authorized to appoint a commission to select engines, dynamos, and other machinery, and to have wiring, construction of engine power, and other permanent work done by day labor, if deemed by him desirable.. For the maintenance of the lighting system during the last six months of the fiscal year of 1891, with necessary additional attendance, policing, and heating of the buildings, including all necessary services, $10,000. Referred to Committee on the Library. > FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. 1575 NATIONAL MUSEUM—NEW BUILDING. January 21, 1892—Senate. Mr. J. S. Morrtitx introduced bill (S. 1758): That for an additional fireproof building for the use of the National Museum, 300 feet square, with two stories and a basement, to be erected under the direction of, the Architect of the Capitol, with the approval of the Regents of the Smith- sonian Institution, in accordance with plans now on file with the Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds, on the southwestern portion of the grounds of the Smithsonian Institution, there shall be appropriated, out of any moneys in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, the sum of $500,000; said building to be placed west of the Smithsonian Institution, leaving a roadway between it and the latter of not less than 50 feet, with its north front on a line with the south face of the Agri- cultural Department and of the Smithsonian Institution, and constructed as far as practicable, after proper advertisement, by contract or contracts awarded to the lowest responsible bidder; and all expenditures for the purposes herein mentioned shall be audited by the proper officers of the Treasury Department. Referred to Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds. February 26, 1892—Senate. ; “Mr. J. S. Morrix reported, without amendment, bill (S. 1758). April 13, 1892—Senate. The bill (S. 1758) was announced as next in order. Mr. F. M. Cocxrety. The Senator reporting and introducing that bill is not here. Let it be passed over without prejudice, retaining its place on the present Calendar. The Vicr-PreEsipEnT (Mr. Levi P. Morton). The bill will be passed over without prejudice. April 14, 1892—Senate. S. 1758 passed. April 16, 1892—House. S. 1758 referred to Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds. NATIONAL MUSEUM—ESTIMATES. December 7, 1891—House. ; Estimates for 1893. For printing labels and blanks, and for the bulletins and annual volumes of the proceedings of the National Museum, $18,000. Notre.—The sum of $18,000 was asked for last year for the purpose of enlarging the mailing list so as to include in it the more important public libraries and educational institutions, and to render it possible, in response to urgent requests, to send the pub- lications of the Museum to individuals who need them for use in connection with scientific investigations. The sum appropriated ($15,000) enabled the Museum to enlarge considerably its mailing list, but the full amount estimated for will be necessary to insure a satisfac- tory distribution. 1576 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. For continuing the preservation, exhibition, and increase of the col- lections from the surveying and exploring expeditions of the Govern- ment, and from other sources, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $145,000. (The Smithsonian Institution estimates for an increase in this item of $35,000 over the present appropriation. ) Norr.—The constant growth of the collections, the steady increase in the number of visitors, and the yearly extending demands of educational institutions and of the public upon the Museum render the appropriations of last year insufficient, although expended with the strictest economy. A small amount of money is also essential for the purchase of specimens which can not be obtained otherwise, and which are indispensable for completing series in the collections. It is desirable that the number of persons in the paid scientific staff should be increased. At present much of the scientific work is performed by volunteers with- out compensation—a system which is found advantageous to a limited extent only. Even with this aid from scientists not connected with the Museum, it is impossible for the curators and their assistants to perform the urgent work of their departments. This is attributable in a degree to the growing frequency of the demands of educa- tional institutions and the outside public upon the staff for information and aid. The salaries paid the scientific staff should be greater, their compensation being at present less for actual service than that of teachers of the higher grades in the public schools. The salaries of clerks and other administrative employees are much smaller than the compensation for similar ‘services in the Executive Departments’ of the Goy- ernment. ! A greater number of watchmen is required to insure the safe-keeping of the yvalua- ble collections, and, in order that the number of hours of service of the laboring force may not be increased, more laborers and cleaners are necessary for the care and arrangement of the cases and collections and for keeping the buildings in proper condition. To meet customs-duties on glass, tin, and other dutiable articles and supplies imported for the National Museum, $1,000. Y (The Smithsonian Institution estimates for an increase in this item of $1,000 over the present appropriation. ) Nore.—Rendered necessary under the provisions of the act of October 1, 1890, “to reduce the revenue,’’ etc. For cases, furniture, fixtures, and appliances required for the exhi- bition and safe-keeping of the collections of the National Museum, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $25,000. (The Smithsonian Institution estimates for an increase in this item of $5,000 over the present appropriation. ) Norr.—To keep pace with the constant increase in the number of objects, espe- cially in the educational and study series, and with the growing demands of the pub- lic, and to care properly for the valuable objects now in the custody of the Museum and constantly being added to the series, provision must be made for the construc- tion of additional cases; especially is this true of the valuable lay figures illustrating the characteristics of the races of mankind, many of which it has so far been neces- sary to leave unprotected. About one-half the amount heretofore appropriated has SS es eS eee ee nn eas 5 “ FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. L577 been needed year by year to pay for the services of constructors, carpenters, engi- neer of property, and two clerks, leaving only about $12,000 for other purposes. It is therefore hoped that the entire amount asked for will be appropriated. For expense of heating, lighting, electrical, telegraphic, and tele- phonic service for the National Museum, including salaries or compen- sation of all necessary employees, $12,000. (The Smithsonian Institution estimates for an increase in this item of $3,000 over the present appropriation. ) Norr.—It is necessary to keep the buildings at a nearly unifcrm temperature throughout the twenty-four hours. Unless this course is followed, as stated last year, the safety of the collections will be endangered. Should the winter prove a severe one, unless the entire amount asked for is appropriated, a deficiency estimate will be found necessary. ) For increasing the electric-light plant of the National Museum by the addition of one engine, two dynamos, and complement of arc and incandescent lamps, including all necessary expenses of installation, $5,000. Norr.—There is at present in use in the Museum building twenty-five arc lights, but this number is not sufficient to illuminate the entire building, there being no lights in the courts and an insufficient number in the halls. It is thought that with this additional plant the building may be so lighted that it can be thrown open occasionally to the public at night, to the advantage of those persons who are unabie to avail themselves of the regular hours of exhibition. The purchase of an addi- tional engine will also render it possible to provide against the contingency of total darkness in case of damage to dynamo, line, or motor. For the erection of two galleries, one in the southwest court, the other in the southeast range, National Museum building; said galleries to be constructed of iron beams, supported by iron pillars, and pro- tected by iron railings, and provided with suitable staircases; the work to be done under the direction of the Architect of the Capitol, and in accordance with the approval of the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, $8,000. Norr.—The erection of these galleries will add materially to the area now ayaila- ble for exhibition purposes. The space needed for their construction can be used without disadvantage to the exhibits already in the halls. For postage stamps and foreign postal cards and postage for the Smithsonian Institution, National Museum, and international exchanges, $500. ; January 26, 1892—House. Deficiency estimates for 1892, etc. To meet customs duties on glass imported for the National Museum, being for the service of the fiscal year 1892, $500. Norr.—Rendered necessary under the provisions of the act of October 1, 1890, “to reduce the revenue,’’ etc. 1578 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. May 10, 1892—House. Mr. Wiuu1aAM CoGswELL. The National Museum has been cut down ‘from the estimate $25,000, notwithstanding the estimate states that ‘Sa greater number of watchmen is required to insure the safe-keeping of the valuable collections; and in order that the number of hours of service of the laboring force may not be increased, more laborers and cleaners are necessary for the care and arrangement of the cases and collections, and for keeping the building in proper condition.” For ‘‘cases, permanent fixtures, and appliances” required for the exhibition and safe-keeping of the collections of the Museum, the estimate has been cut $15,000, although the fact that it was required for the safe-keeping of the collections is emphasized; and, notwith- standing it is necessary to keep the temperature uniform throughout the twenty-four hours, the appropriation for heating, lighting, ete., for the Museum has been cut $2,000 less than it was last year. December 5, 1892—House. Estimates for 1894. For printing and binding for the National Museum, to be executed under the direction of the Public Printer, as follows: Printing labels and blanks, and for the Bulletins and annual volumes of the Proceedings of the National Museum, $18,000. Binding scientific books and pamphlets presented to and acquired by the National Museum Library, $1,000. Norr.—The Proceedings and Bulletins of the National Museum, printed under this appropriation, are not ‘‘ public documents,’’ hence no part of the edition is reg- ularly apportioned for distribution by the Senate and House, or to the legal deposi- tories. The edition of 3,000 copies now printed is only sufficient to supply, in limited measure, the very urgent requests from public libraries, educational institu- tions, and scientific investigators in the United States and throughout the world. One of the principal objects in asking for a larger appropriation is to enable the Museum to place a full series of its publications in representative libraries in different parts of each State. Jt is not the intention that the annual number of issues of the Proceedings and Bulletins should be increased, but that a larger edition of each should be printed. On account of the small edition the Museum fails to receive in exchange the valuable publications of many scientific institutions. The amounts hitherto appropriated, though expended with strict economy, have been found inadequate. For postage stamps and foreign postal cards and postage for the Smithsonian Institution, National Museum, Bureau of International Exchanges, Bureau of Ethnology, and National Zoological Park, $500. For continuing the preservation, exhibition, and increase of the col- lections from the surveying and exploring expeditions of the Govern- ment and from other sources, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $180,000. Norr.—The growth of the collections, the increase in the number of visitors, and in the number and variety of the demands of educational institutions and the public render it extremely desirable that the appropriation for the Museum should be larger. a =* ee ee ——— FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. 1579 The appropriations for 1893 were not only less than for the preceding year, but scarcely exceeded those for 1887, although the collections have increased, chiefly through donations, by nearly a million specimens since that time. On account of the reduc- tion in the appropriations for 1893, it is impossible to meet the increased demands of the year, and no attention can be given to many important matters lying over from preceding years. For these reasons, and others of equal moment, it is greatly . to be hoped that the entire sum of $180,000, which has twice been estimated for, but not received, may now be granted. For the welfare of the Museum it is desirable that an increase should be made in the number of paid assistants on the scientific staff. Much work is performed by volunteers, without compensation, but this sys- tem has only a limited usefulness. Even with this assistance it is impossible, in many departments, to keep pace with the growth of the collections, and the con- stantly increasing demand of educational establishments and the public for informa- tion and aid. Many of the salaries are too low to secure efficient service. The compensation of the members of the scientific staff is less than that of teachers in the higher public schools, although the service rendered is of a very special character. The clerical employees are paid less than in the Executive Departments; hence many leave after a short period of service, to the serious detriment of the Museum, which _ is constantly compelled to train new employees. For the safe-keeping of the collec- tions, which have greatly increased in intrinsic value as well as extent, a larger number of watchmen is necessary. The force is now so small that it is difficult to grant the usual leaves of absence without exposing the collections to danger. It is also with difficulty that the cleanliness of the floors and cases is maintained, on account of the limited number of laborers and cleaners which the present appropria- tion will permit the Museum to employ. For cases, furniture, fixtures, and appliances required for the exhi- bition and safe-keeping of the collections of the National Museum, in- cluding salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $30,000. Norr.—Although the Museum halls are already in a crowded condition, it is necessary, without regard to the width of aisles and the established arrangement of exhibits, to find room for the collections which are constantly received by donation. Many valuable objects are still exposed to dust and vandalism from the lack of suffi- cient money to procure the necessary cases. Collections, such as the great Lacoe collection of fossil plants, received in 1892, are frcquently offered, with the condition that suitable cases be provided. Judging by the experience of the Museum in connection with the Philadelphia, London, New Orleans, and Cincinnati -exhibitions, it will be necessary during 1893 to make provision for the large number of collections which will be presented to the Government at the close of the World’s Columbian Exposition. For the safe-keeping of these objects numerous storage and exhibition cases will be required, and it is therefore hoped that the sum of $30,000 will be appropriated. For expense of heating, lighting, electrical, telegraphic, and tele- phonic service for the National Museum, including salaries or com- pensation of all necessary employees, $15,000. Norr.—The larger part of this appropriation is expended for fuel and gas. As has been explained in connection with the estimates for previous years, it is neces- sary for the safety of the collections that the building should be kept at a nearly even temperature day and night throughout the winter. The reduction of this appropriation in 1893 below the minimum of $12,000 makes a deficiency for that year necessary. From lack of fuel required to maintain the proper temperature, some of the offices had to be abandoned on several occasions during the winter of 1892. 1580 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. The longer the heating apparatus is used the less effective it becomes, and of late it has been necessary each successive year to expend a aeer sum for replacing _ worn-out parts. The wires of the burglar alarms, watchmen’s call boxes, and other electrical appa- ratus have deteriorated from long use. Some of these have already been renewed, and others need immediate attention. For the erection of two galleries, one in the southwest court, the other in the southeast range, National Museum building; said galleries to be constructed of iron beams, supported by iron pillars, and pro- tected by iron railings, and provided with suitable staircases; the work to be done under the direction of the Architect of the Capitol and in accordance with the approval of the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, $8,000. Notr.—The erection of these galleries will add materially to the area available in the present Museum building for exhibition purposes. Such galleries were provided for in the original plans of the building. They can be supported in such a manner as not to detract from the appearance of the halls or to interfere with the present installation of the collections. December 9, 1892—House. Deficiency estimates for 1893, ete. For continuing the preservation, exhibition, and increase of the col- lections from the surveying and exploring expeditions of the Govern- ment, and from other sources, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, being a deficiency for the fiscal year. ending June 30; 18938, $14,770 Norr.—The reduction of the force of taxidermists and other preparators, rendered necessary by the smaller appropriations granted for the current year, has made it impossible to properly care for the numerous collections which have been given to the Government with the understanding that they should be preserved. Unless relief is afforded it is feared that much material, valuable to science and educational institutions, will go to destruction. Unexpected emergencies have arisen, such as the necessity for roaee the entire outfit of fire hose in the two buildings. The present force of employees is insufficient to properly carry on the work of the Museum, since reductions detrimental to the service have been made in order to obviate the necessity for a larger deficiency estimate. More watchmen are required in order to insure the safety of the collections, and more laborers and cleaners to keep the exhibition halls in a presentable condition. The regular clerical work of the Museum has fallen in arrears, owing to the fact that it has been necessary for the clerks to devote much of their time to matters connected with the World’s Colum- bian Exposition. It will be necessary, about February 1, to restore to the Museum roll the names.of at least nine employees temporarily engaged in work for the Expo- sition, and now paid from the Exposition appropriation. For expenses of heating the U. S. National Museum for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1893, $2,000. For rent of eight telephones, $240. Norre.—It will be impossible to heat the buildings properly throughout the win- ter unless additional fuel is provided. Last year, when the appropriation was $1,000 more than this year, and the greatest care was used to prevent waste, it was found FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. 1581 necessary to close the offices on several occasions, on account of lack of fuel to heat the building. A deficiency of $2,000 is therefore asked for. It was necessary to reduce the number of telephones in order that money should be available to renew the wires, which, from long use, had become entirely worn out. January 7, 1893—House. Supplemental deficiency estimates for 1893 by the U. 8. Fish Commission, ete. Office building, U. S. Fish Commission esis building): For new roof, construction of annex for boiler room, coal vault, and fireproof storage room; the purchase and introduction of new boilers for heat- ing and the necessary connections, and for miscellaneous repairs and equipment, $2,500; and the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution is hereby directed to vacate the rooms under his charge in said build- ing. For fitting up said rooms as offices for the U.S. Fish Commission, $1,400; in all, $3,900. NATIONAL MUSEUM—APPROPRIATIONS. July 28, 1892. Deficiency act for 1892, ete. To pay amounts found due by the accounting officers of the Treas- ury on account of preservation of collections, National Museum, being for the services of the fiscal year 1890, as follows: To pay the Balti- more and Ohio Railroad Company, $4.47; to pay the Atlantic and Pacific Railroad Company, $2.50; in all, $6.97. (Stat., XX VIL, 283.) For preservation of collections, National Museum, $1. 34. (Stat. XX VII, 309.) (To cover claim reported in House Ex. Doc. No. 199, Fifty-second Congress, first session.) August 5, 1892. Sundry civil act for 1893. For continuing the preservation, exhibition, and increase of the col- lection from the surveying and exploring expeditions of the Govern- ment, and from other sources, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $132,500. For cases, furniture, ne and appliances required for the exhi- bition and safe-keeping of the collections of the National Museum, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $15,000. For expense of heating, lighting, electrical, telegraphic and tele- phonic service for the National Museum, $11,000. For postage stamps and foreign postal cards for the National Museum, $500. (Stat., XX VII, 360.) For the-Smithsonian Institution, for printing labels and blanks and for the ‘* Bulletins” and annual volumes of the ‘‘ Proceedings” of the National Museum, $12,000. (Stat., XX VII, 388.) 1582 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. March 3, 1893. Sundry civil aet for 1894. _ For continuing the preservation, exhibition, and increase of the col- lections from the surveying and exploring expeditions of the Govern- ment, and from other sources, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $132,500. (Stat., XX VIT, 581.) For cases, furniture, fixtures, and appliances required for the exhi- bition and safe-keeping of the collections of the National Museum, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $10,000. For expense of heating, lighting, electrical, telegraphic, and tele- phonic service for the National Museum, $11,000. For postage stamps and foreign postal cards for the National Museum, $500. (Stat., X XVII, 582.) For the Smithsonian Institution, for printing labels and blanks and for the ‘‘ Bulletins” and annual volumes of the ‘*‘ Proceedings ” of the National Museum, $12,000. (Stat., XX VII, 611.) March 3, 1893. Deficiency act for 1893, etc. For expenses of heating the United States National Museum, $2,000. For continuing the preservation, exhibition, and increase of the col- lection from the surveying and exploring expeditions of the Govern- ment, and from other sources, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $2,000. (Stat., X XVII, 649.) Under Smithsonian Institution: For preservation of collections, National Museum, $1.37. (Stat., XX VII, 668.) EXPOSITIONS. Madrid Exposition. February 8, 1892—Senate. Mr. JoHN SHERMAN presented a communication from the Secretary of State: DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Washington, D. C., February 3, 1892. Sir: I desire to suggest that the bill providing for the appointment of representa- tives from the United States to the Columbian Historical Exposition at Madrid in 1892, introduced in the Senate through your courtesy, be amended so that the first section will read: ‘‘That the President of the United States be, and he hereby is, authorized and requested to appoint a commissioner-general and two assistant com- missioners, who shall serve without compensation,”’ ete. This is to be an historical exposition, and only the United States and the other republics and colonies of America have been invited to participate. It is proposed a. FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. 1583 therefore to confine the exhibit from this country to such appropriate archeological, ethnological, and historical objects and articles as are now in the museums and archives of the Government, or may be contributed or loaned by private individuals. It may be found practicable also to include in the exhibit some portion of the collec- tions that are now being made by the Executive Departments of the Government for the World’s Columbian Exposition at Chicago in 1893. At the request,ef the minister of Spain at this capital voluntary committees have already been formed in Washington, New York, and other States of the Union to promote an interest in the Spanish exposition, and to secure collections for exhibi- tion there. These committees have already made gratifying progress, and it is believed that under the direction of an experienced and competent commissioner- general an excellent display may be made. As Spain was one of the first of the foreign g governments to accept the invitation of the United States to participate in the proposed exposition at Chicago, it would only be ordinary courtesy to a friendly nation for us to do all in our power to promote the success of the plans she has formed to commemorate an event in which we are equally interested.- I would call your attention dighee e to the fact that the Madrid Exposition opens on the 12th of September next, and that early action by Congress is therefore desir- able. It will be necessary only to provide the means to pay the expenses of the commissioners, and also the expense of preparing, packing, transporting, and install- ing the exhibit at Madrid and its return to the United States. I have the honor to be, sir, your obedient servant, JAMES G. BLAINE. Hon. JoHN SHERMAN, Chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate. May 13, 1892. . Urgent deficiency act for 1892. For the expense of representation of the United States at the Colum- bian Historical Exposition to be held in Madrid in 1892 in commem- oration of the four hundredth anniversary of the discovery of America, $15,000, or so much thereof as may be necessary, to be expended under the direction and in the discretion of the Secretary of State; and the Président is hereby authorized to appoint a commissioner-general and two assistant commissioners, who may, in his discretion, be selected from the active or retired list of the Army or Navy, and shall serve without other compensation than that to which they are now entitled by law, to represent the United States at said exposition; that it shall be the duty of such commissioners to select from the archives of the United States, from the National Museum, and from the various Execu- tive Departments of the Government such pictures, books, papers, documents, and other articles as may relate to the discovery and early settlement of America and the aboriginal inhabitants thereof; and they shall be authorized to secure the loan of similar articles from other museums and private collections, and arrange, classify, and install them as the exhibit of the United States at the said exposition; that the President is authorized to cause the detail of officers from the ‘active or retired list of the Army and Navy, to serve without compen- sation other than that to which they are now entitled by law, as assist- 1584 CONGRESSIONAL * PROCEEDINGS. ants to said commissioners; and the said commissioners shall beauthor- ized to employ such clerical and other assistance as may be necessary, subject to the approval of the Secretary of State. (Stat., XXXVI, 34.) [ Nore.—In accordance with this act the following-named gentlemen were appointed: Rear-Admiral 8. B. Luce, United States Navy (retired), commissioner-general; James C. Welling, LL. D., president Columbian University, and George Brown Goode, LL. D., assistant secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, commissioners; Lieut. John C. Colwell, United States Navy, special disbursing officer; Mr. William E. Curtis and Prof. Thomas Wilson, assistants; Mr. Stewart Culin, secretary, and Mr. Walter Hough, assistant. ] . August 5, 1892. Sundry civil act for 1893. Columbian Historical Exposition at Madrid: For expenses of repre- sentation of the United States at said exposition, $10,000. (Stat., XX VIT, 350.) Chicago Exposition. March 11, 1892—House. Mr. James B. Rerixy introduced joint resolution (H. 106) that the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution send exhibit illustrative of industries of women to Woman’s Building, Chicago Exposition. Referred to Select Committee on the Columbian Exposition. February 8, 1893—Senate. S. 148 introduced by Mr. R. F. PETTIGREW. February 17, 1893—Senate. S. 148 passed. March 3, 1893—House. S. 148 passed. March 3, 1893. Resolved, etc., That the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution be, and he hereby is, authorized to prepare and send, for exhibition in the Woman’s Building of the World’s Columbian Exposition, any article now in his custody, or on exhibition in the National Museum, illus- trative of the life and development of the industries of women. (Stat., XX VIL, 757.) March 18, 1892. Be it enacted, etc., That the act of the sixteenth lopiiniditiee assembly of the Territory of Arizona, approved March 19, 1891, making an appropriation of $30,000 for the collection and display of the products of Arizona at the World’s Columbian Exposition of 1893, and made dependent on ratification by Congress, is hereby approved and ratified. (Stat., XX VII, 7.) March 24, 1892. Resolwed, etc., That ie Librarian of Congress be, and he hereby is, authorized to exhibit at the World’s Columbian Baposiiad such howls FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. 1585 papers, documents, and other articles from the Library of Congress as may relate to Christopher Columbus and the discovery and early history of America. (Stat., XX VII, 394.) April 6, 1892. k Be it enacted, ete., That no citizen of any other country shall be held liable for the infringement of any patent granted by the United States, or of any trade-mark or label registered in the United States, where the act complained of is or shall be performed in connection with the exhibition of any article or thing at the World’s Columbian Exposi- tion at Chicago. (Stat., XX VII, 14.) May 12, 1892. Be tt enacted, etc., That any national bank located in the city of Chicago and State of Illinois may be designated by the World’s Columbian Exposition to conduct a banking office upon the exposition grounds, and upon such designation being approved by the Comp- troller of the Currency said bank is hereby authorized to open and conduct such office as a branch of the bank, subject to the same restrictions and having the same rights as the bank to which it belongs: Provided, That the branch office authorized hereby shall not be oper- ated fora longer period than two years, beginning not earlier than July 1, 1892, and closing not later than July 1, 1894. (Stat., XXX VII, 33.) July 13, 1892. Post-Office act for 1893. Src. 4. That the Postmaster-General is hereby authorized to estab- lish in the Government building, upon the ground of the World’s Columbian Exposition, a branch station of the Chicago, IIl., post- office; and there is hereby appropriated the sum of $40,000 for clerks, letter carriers, and incidental expenses necessary to maintain the same, . and a further sum of $23,000 for transportation of mails by railroad and mail-messenger service, the branch office herein provided to begin not earlier than January 1. 1893. (Stat., XX VII, 148.) July 19, 1892. Naval act for 1893. Toward the expenses of the international naval rendezvous and review, as provided in section 8 of the act creating the World’s Columbian Exposition, including pay and drill of seamen temporarily enlisted and used for said review in addition to the regular number of enlisted men and including the construction by the Secretary of the Navy of reproductions in Spain of two of the caravels, the Pinta and the Vina, which composed the fleet of Columbus on his voyage of H. Doe. 732 L100 1586 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. discovery, to be taken after the review to Chicago as a part of the Government exhibit, $50,000. (Stat., XX VII, 250.) July 23, 1892. Resolwed, etc., That the President be, and he hereby is, authorized to request of the Government of Her Majesty the Queen Regent of Spain, of the municipal government of Genoa, of the Duke of Vera- gua, the descendants of Columbus, and of such other persons or cor- porations as may be thought proper, the loan of articles, papers, books, maps, documents, and other relics of Christopher Columbus and those who were associated with him or with the discovery and early settlement of America, for exhibition at the World’s Columbian Exposition; that the Secretary of State shall make such provision as may be necessary for their reception, exhibition, safe custody, and return; and that the Secretary of the Navy shall have authority, if necessary, to detail one or more vessels for their transportation. (Stat., XX VII, 399.) July 26, 1892. Resolved, etc., That the Secretary of the Interior be, and he hereby is, authorized to prepare and send for exhibition in the Woman’s Building of the World’s Columbian Exposition any articles, models, or drawings now in his custody, or deposited in the Patent Office, pre- pared or invented by women. (Stat., XX VII, 400). August 4, 1892. Be tt enacted, etc., That the date for the dedication of the buildings of the World’s Columbian Exposition is hereby changed from the 12th day of October, 1892, to the 21st day of October, 1892. (Stat., XX VII, 347). August 5, 1892. Sundry civil act for 1893. For establishing new life-saving stations and lifeboat stations on the sea and lake coasts of the United States, authorized by law, $45,000: Provided, That no part of this sum, or of the sums heretofore appro- priated for establishing life-saving stations, shall be used for erecting a life-saving station on the grounds of the World’s Columbian Expo- sition at Chicago, Ill., unless the right to use and occupy the site selected therefor so long as the Government may desire to maintain a life-saving station thereon shall first have been donated to the United States, in which case so much of this appropriation or of the sums heretofore appropriated for establishing life-saving stations as may be necessary shall be available for the purpose; and such station shall take - the place of the existing Chicago station, the crew of which shall be transferred to the new station. (Stat., XX VII, 354). a ee es ee ae i ‘ FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. 1587 To make offshore soundings along the Atlantic coast, and current and temperature observations in the Gulf Stream, and to transport the steamer Blake to Chicago and keep her there during the Columbian Exposition, for the purpose of exhibiting the instruments and methods of deep-sea sounding, $6,400. (Stat., XX VII, 356). Government Exhibit: For the selection, purchase, preparation, transportation, installation, care and custody, and arrangement of such articles and materials as the heads of the several Executive Departments, the Smithsonian Institution, and National Museum, and the U. S. Fish Commission may decide shall be embraced in the Goy- ernment exhibit, and such additional articles as the President may designate for said Exposition, and for the employment of proper per- sons as Officers and assistants to the Board of Control and Management of the Government exhibit, appointed by the President, of which not exceeding $5,000 may be expended by said board for clerical services, $408,250: Provided, That all expenditures for the purposes and from the appropriation specified herein shall be subject to the approval of the said Board of Control: and Management and of the Secretary of the Treasury, as now provided by law. World’s Columbian Commission: For the World’s Columbian Com- mission, $230,000, of which sum $110,000 shall be used for the Board of Lady Managers: Provided, That all expense of administration and ° installation in the Woman’s Building shall be paid by the World’s Columbian Exposition: Provided, That the salaries of the Director- General and Secretary of the Commission shall not exceed $8,000 and $3,000, respectively, per annum, and a sum not exceeding $5,000 may be used by the Director-General in his discretion for incidental and contingent expenses of his office, and there shall not be more than two meetings of the World’s Columbian Commission or of the Board of Lady Managers during the fiscal year 1893. And the sums herein appropriated for the World’s Columbian Exposition shall be in full of the liability of the United States on account thereof: Prowded, That the Government exhibits at the World’s Columbian Exposition shall not be opened to the public on Sundays. That the Secretary of War be, and he hereby is, authorized at his discretion to detail for special duty, in connection with the World’s Columbian Exposition, such officers of the Army as may be required, to report to the general commanding the Department of the Missouri, and the officers thus detailed shall not be subject to loss of pay or rank on account of such detail, nor shall any officer or employee of the United States receive additional pay or compensation because of service connected with said Exposition from the United States or from said Exposition. (Stat., XX VII, 362.) 1588 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Public printing and binding: Sec. 2. And it is hereby declared that all appropriations herein made for, or pertaining to, the World’s Columbian Exposition are made upon the condition that the said Ex- position shall not be opened to the public on the first day of the week, commonly called Sunday; and if the said appropriations be accepted by the corporation of the State of Illinois, known as the World’s Columbian Exposition, upon that condition, it shall be, and it is hereby, made the duty of the World’s Columbian Commission, created by act of Congress of April 25th, 1890, to make such rules or modification of the rules of said corporation as shall require the closing of the Exposition on the said first day of the week, commonly called Sunday. (Stat., XX VII, 388.) August 5, 1892. Be it enacted, etc., That for the purpose of aiding in defraying the cost of completing in a suitable manner the work of preparation for inaugurating the World’s Columbian Exposition, authorized by the act of Congress approved April 25th, anno Domini 1890, to be held at the city of Chicago, in the State of Illinois, there shall be coined at the mints of the United States silver half-dollars of the legal weight and fineness, not to exceed five million pieces, to be known as the Colum- bian half-dollar, struck in commemoration of the World’s Columbian Exposition, the devices and designs upon which shall be prescribed by the Director of the Mint, with the approval of the Secretary of the Treasury; and said silver coins shall be manufactured from uncurrent subsidiary silver coins now in the Treasury, and all provisions of law relative to the coinage, legal-tender quality, and redemption of the present subsidiary silver coins shall be applicable to the coins issued under this act, and when so recoined there is hereby appropriated from the Treasury the said five millions of souvenir half-dollars, and the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to pay the same to the World’s Columbian Exposition, upon estimates and vouchers certified by the president of the World’s Columbian Exposition, or in his absence or inability to act, by the vice-president, and by the director-general of the World’s Columbian Commission, or in his absence or inability to act, by the president thereof, and the Secretary of the Treasury, for labor done, materials furnished, and services performed in prosecuting said work of preparing said Exposition for opening as provided by said act approved April 25th, 1890; and all such estimates and vouch- ers shall be made in duplicate, one to be filed with the Secretary of the Treasury, the other to be retained by the World’s Columbian Exposition: Provided, however, That before the Secretary of the Treasury shall pay to the World’s Columbian Exposition any part of the said five million silver coins, satisfactory evidence shall be furnished him showing that the sum of at least $10,000,000 has been collected and disbursed as required by said act: And provided, That the said World’s FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. 1589 Columbian Exposition shall furnish a satisfactory guaranty to the Sec- retary of the Treasury that any further sum actually necessary to com- plete the work of said Exposition to the opening thereof has been or will be provided by said World’s Columbian Exposition; but nothing herein shall be so construed as to delay or postpone the preparation of the souvenir coins hereinbefore provided for. And there is hereby appropriated, out of any moneys in the Treasury not otherwise appro- priated, the sum of $50,000, or so much thereof as may be necessary, to reimburse the Treasury for loss on the recoinage herein authorized. Src. 2. That the appropriation provided in section one of this act shall be upon condition that the said World’s Columbian Exposition maintain and pay all the expenses, costs, and charges of the great departments organized for the purpose of conducting the work of the Exposition, said expenses, costs, and charges to be paid out of the funds of the said World’s Columbian Exposition. Sec. 3. That fifty thousand bronze medals and the necessary dies therefor, with appropriate devices, emblems, and inscriptions commem- orative of said Exposition celebrating the four hundredth anniversary of the discovery of America by Christopher Columbus, shall be pre- pared under the supervision of the Secretary of the Treasury at a cost not to exceed $60,000, and the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, under the supervision of the Secretary of the Treasury, shall prepare plates and make therefrom fifty thousand vellum impressions for diplomas at a cost not to exceed $43,000. Said medals and diplomas shall be delivered to the World’s Columbian Commission, to be awarded to exhibitors in accordance with the provisions of said act of Congress approved April 25th, 1890, and there is hereby appropriated, from any moneys in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, the sum of 103,000, or so much thereof as may be necessary, to pay the expendi- tures authorized by this section; and authority may be granted by the Secretary of the Treasury to the holder of a medal, properly awarded to him, to have duplicates thereof made at any of the mints of the United States from gold, or silver, or bronze, at the expense of the person desiring the same. Src. 4. That it is hereby declared that all appropriations herein made for, or pertaining to, the World’s Columbian Exposition are made upon the condition that the said Exposition shall not be opened to the public on the first day of the week, commonly called Sunday; and if the said appropriations be accepted by the corporation of the State of Illinois, known as the World’s Columbian Exposition, upon that condition, it shall be, and it is hereby, made the duty of the World’s Columbian Commission, created by the act of Congress of April 25th, 1890, to make such rules or modification of the rules of said corporation as ' shall require the closing of the Exposition on the said first day of the week, commonly called Sunday. 1590 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Src. 5. That nothing contained in this act shall be construed to sup- ersede or in any manner alter or impair the force or validity of the provisions of section 15 of the act of Congress approved April 25th, anno Domini 1890. (Stat., XX VIL, 389.) August 5, 1892. Resolved, etc., That the President of the United States be, and he hereby is, authorized and requested to extend to His Majesty Alfonso Thirteenth, to Her Majesty the Queen Regent of Spain, and to Cristo- bal Colon de la Cerda, the Duke of Veragua; second, the Marquis de Barboles, his brother, and, third, Don Cristobal de Larreategul y Aguilar, his son, their wives and children, if any, the living descend- ants of Christopher Columbus, an invitation to attend the opening ceremonies of the World’s Columbian Exposition as the guests of the Government and people of the United States; and that under his direc- tion the Secretary of State shall make suitable arrangements for their reception and entertainment. (Stat., XX VII, 401.) August 5, 1892. Whereas, under and in pursuance of the act approved April 25th, anno Domini 1890, the President of the United States has invited the governments and citizens of foreign nations to participate in the inter- national exhibition authorized by the act above recited; and Whereas the invitations so extended have been accepted by the sev- eral nations, and space for installing foreign exhibits has been applied for and duly apportioned, and concessions and privileges granted by the Exposition management to the citizens and subjects of foreign nations; and Whereas, for the purpose of securing the production upon the Exposition grounds of scenes illustrative of the architecture, dress, habits, and modes of life, occupation, industries, means of locomo- tion and transportation, amusements, entertainments, etc., of the natives of foreign countries, it has been necessary for the World’s Columbian- Exposition to grant concessions and privileges to certain firms and corporations conceding the right to make such productions: Therefore, Resolved, etc., That the actof Congress approved February 26th, 1885, prohibiting the importation of foreigners under contract to perform labor, and the acts of Congress prohibiting the coming of Chinese per- sons into the United States, and the acts amendatory of these acts, shall not be so construed nor shall anything therein operate to prevent, hinder, or in any wise restrict any foreign exhibitor, representative, or citizen of a foreign nation or the holder who is a citizen of a foreign ~ FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. 1591 nation of any concession or privilege from the World’s Columbian Exposition, from bringing into the United States, under contract, such mechanics, artisans, agents, or other employees, natives of their respective foreign countries, as they, or any of them, may deem nec- essary for the purpose of making preparation for installing or con- ducting their exhibits or of preparing for installing or conducting any business authorized or permitted under or by virtue of or pertain- ing to any concession or privilege which may have been granted by the World’s Columbian Exposition in connection with such Exposi- tion: Provided, however, That no alien shall by virtue of this act enter the United States under contract to perform labor except by express permission, naming such alien, of the.Secretary of the Treasury; and any such alien who may remain in the United States for more than one year after the close of said Exposition shall thereafter be subject to all the processess and penalties applicable to aliens coming in violation of the alien contract labor laws aforesaid. (Stat., XX VII, 402.) December 22, 1892—Senate. Mr. Lyman R. Casey introduced joint resolution (S. 127): That the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution be, and he hereby is, author- ized to loan to the World’s Fair Commission of the State of North Dakota for use as part of its exhibit at the Columbian Exposition the Red River cart. now in the National Museum, and originally received from Pembina, Dakota, in 1882: Provided, That such loan be made entirely on the responsibility of said North Dakota Com- mission, and shall be returned to the Smithsonian Institution in good order, and without expense to the Government, within one month after the close of the said Columbian Exposition. Passed. January 5, 1893—House. The joint resolution (S. 127) referred to Committee on the Library. January 17, 1893—House. Mr. Amos J. Cummines, from Committee on the Library, reported back favorably joint resolution (S. 127). Referred to the House Calendar. February 13, 1893. Lesolved, etc., That the Architect of the Capitol be, and he hereby is, authorized to loan to the Department of State the picture in the’ Capitol entitled ‘‘The Recall of Columbus,” by Augustus G. Heaton, for exhibition at the World’s Columbian Exposition. (Stat., XX VII, 754.) 1592 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. February 13, 1893—Senate. Mr. Wiiu1aM B. Autison, from Committee on Appropriations, sub- mitted report (5S. 1287): ; [Extract.] [By Prof. G. Brown Goode, Assistant Secretary, representing Smithsonian Institution and National Museum, February 6, 1893.] * * * * * * * The plan and estimates submitted to you on June 30, 1892, was largely reduced from the original plan furnished to the Secretary of the Treasury on March 12, 1890, which was by no means an extravagant one to have undertaken, in view of the importance of the occasion and the great expectations of the people who will attend the exposition. Indeed, the exhibition of the-Institution, as at that time limited, would not have been so extensive as that made at the exhibition of 1876, though in nearly every respect a better one. As we are at present situated, unless Congress should appropriate the additional sum for which we have been hoping, a still further reduction will be necessary. We shall, of course, send the objects which have been- prepared at the expense of the appropriation, but many very conspicuous gaps exist in the series which we had hoped to exhibit. These can not be filled without addi- tional money, and, furthermore, many objects from the Museum itself, which we had hoped to be able to send, can not go owing to the lack of money to provide suitable cases and to pay the expenses of transportation. The charges imposed by the railroads and by the people in Chicago for the storage of packing boxes are so enormous in comparison with what has been paid by the Government on previous occasions, that it isevident that the incidental expenses will be very much larger than ever before, and that in order to carry out, with present resources and without incurring a deficiency, even the modified plan will necessitate the closest economy and a very considerable diminution of the effect of the exhibition in every direction. In the matter of the decoration of the walls of the exhibition halls with striking objects in keeping with the collection on the floor below, it will be impossible for us to do anything except in the most meager way. With rigid economy an additional $30,000 to our allotment, such as I understand would come to us if Congress grants the sum asked for, would enable us to make a creditable exhibition. The effect of any diminution of this amount will, in spite of our best efforts, undoubtedly be perceptible to visitors, and will prevent the send- ing of things which would add much to the effect and value of our display. March 3, 1893. Sundry civil act for 1894. Government Exhibit: For the selection, purchase, preparation, transportation, installation, care and custody, and return of such arti- cles and materials as the heads of the several Executive Departments, _the Smithsonian Institution and National Museum, and the United States Fish Commission may decide shall be embraced in the Govern- ment exhibit, and such additional articles as the President may desig- nate for said exposition, and for the employment of proper persons as officers and assistants to the Board of Control and Management of the Government exhibit, appointed by the President, of which not exceed- ing $10,000 may be expended by said board for clerical services $150,750; of which sum $50,000 shall be immediately available: Pro- vided, That the sum of $8,000, or so much thereof as may be necessary, may be expended under the supervision of the Board of Control of FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. 15938 the United States Government exhibit in the collection, preparation, packing, transportation, installation, and care while exhibited of arti- cles loaned or donated by the colleges of agriculture and mechanic arts in the several States for the display in the agricultural building of the exposition, of the means and methods of giving instruction in the so-called land-grant college of the United States, and for repacking and returning this property at the close of the exposition, the same to be taken from the stm apportioned to the Agricultural Department; ~ and $10,000 additional for special expenses attending the naval exhibit of the model of a battle ship. World’s Columbian Commission: For the World’s Columbian Com- mission, $211,375, of which sum $93,190 shall be used for the Board of Lady Managers; and $25,000 of the last sum is hereby made imme- diately available; and $10,000 of the appropriation for the Board of Lady Managers shall be paid in souvenir coins of the denomination of 25 cents, and for that purpose there shall be coined at the mints of the United States silver quarter dollars of the legal weight and fine- ness, not to exceed forty thousand pieces, the devices and designs upon which shall be prescribed by the Director of the Mint, with the approval of the Secretary of the Treasury; and said silver coins shall be manu- factured from uncurrent subsidiary silver coins now in the Treasury; and all provisions of law relative to the coinage, legal-tender quality, and redemption of the present subsidiary silver coins shall be applica- ble to the coins herein authorized to be issued; and a sum not exceed- ing $5,000 may be used by the Director-General in his discretion for incidental and contingent expenses of his office. To enable said commission and the Board of Lady Managers to give effect to and execute the provisions of section 6 of the act of Con- gress approved April 25, 1890, authorizing the World’s Columbian Exposition, and appropriating money therefor, relating to commit- tees, judges, and examiners for the exposition, and the granting of awards, $570,880, or so much thereof as in the judgment of the Lady Managers may be necessary, of which sum $25,000 shall be immediately available: Provided, That of this sum $100,000 shall be devoted to the payment of judges, examiners, and members of committees to be appointed by the Board of Lady Managers, as authorized by said sec- tion. And provided further, That said sum of $570,880 shall be a charge against the World’s Columbian Exposition, and that of the moneys appropriated for the benefit of the World’s Columbian Expo- sition, amounting to $2,500,000, under the act of August 5, 1892, $570,880 shall be retained by the Secretary of the Treasury until said World’s Columbian Exposition shall have furnished, to the satisfaction of the Secretary of the Treasury, full and adequate security for the return and repayment, by said World’s Columbian Exposition to the Treasury, of the sum of $570,880, on or before October 1, 1893; 1594 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. and until such security shall have been furnished by said World’s Columbian Exposition, this appropriation, or any portion thereof, shall not be available. That section 3 of the act in aid of the Columbian Exposition, approved August 5, 1892, is hereby amended to read as follows: Src. 3. That not to exceed fifty thousand bronze medals and the necessary dies therefor, with appropriate devices, emblems, and inscriptions commemorative of the said exposition celebrating the four hundredth anniversary of the discovery of Amer- ica by Christopher Columbus, shall be prepared under the supervision of the Secre- tary of the Treasury; and the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, under the super- vision of the Secretary of the Treasury, shall prepare plates and make therefrom not to exceed fifty thousand impressions for diplomas, at a total cost not to exceed $103,000. Said medals and diplomas shall be delivered to the World’s Columbian Commission, to be awarded to exhibitors in accordance with the provisions of said act of Congress approved April 25, 1890, and there is hereby appropriated from any moneys in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, the sum of $103,000, or so much thereof as may be necessary, to pay the expenditures authorized by this section. And every person who within the United States or any Territory thereof, without lawful authority, makes, or willingly aids or assists in making, or causes or procures to be made, any dies, hub, plate, or mold, either in steel or of plaster, or any other substance whatsoever, in the likeness or similitude as to the design, or inscription thereon, of any die, hub, plate, or mold, designated for the striking of the medals and diplomas of award for the World’s Columbian Exposition, as pro- vided in section 3 of the act approved August 5, 1892, or conceals or shall have in his possession, any such die, hub, plate, or mold herein- before mentioned, with intent to fraudulently or unlawfully use the same for counterfeiting the medals and diplomas hereinbefore men- tioned, or who shall fraudulently or unlawfully have in his possession or cause to be circulated any duplicate or counterfeit medal or diploma not authorized by the Secretary of the Treasury, shall upon conviction thereof be punished by a fine of not more than $5,000, and be impris- oned at hard labor not more than ten years, or both, at the discretion of the court. | (Stat., XX VII, 585.) March 3, 1893. Indian act for 1894. To enable the Commissioner of Indian Affairs under the direction of the Secretary of the Interior to complete a suitable Indian exhibit at the World’s Columbian Exposition at Chicago, $25,000, to be immediately available. - (Stat., XX VII, 634.) March 3, 1893. ~ Post-Office act for 1894. That so much of the appropriation of $40,000 made by section 4 of the act of Congress approved June 13, 1892, making appropriations for the postal service for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1893, for FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. 1595 clerks, letter-carriers, and incidental expenses necessary to maintain a branch station of the Chicago (Illinois) post-office in the Government building upon the ground of the World’s Columbian Exposition. (Stat., XX VII, 734.) March 3, 1893. Resolved, etc., That the Architect of the Capitol, with the approval of the Chief Justice, is hereby authorized to loan to the Department of Justice the portraits of the Chief Justices of the United States, for exhibition at the World’s Columbian Exposition. (Stat., XX VII, 757.) Philadelphia Centennial Exposition. June 6, 1892. Act approved to enable the Centennial Board of Finance, incorpo- rated by act of June 1, 1872, to close its affairs and dissolve the corpo- ration, any unclaimed money to be paid to the Pennsylvania Museum and School of Industrial Art, in Philadelphia. (Stat., XX VII, 45.) USE OF GOVERNMENT COLLECTIONS IN WASHINGTON BY STUDENTS. February 25, 1892—House. Mr. J. J. Hempniy introduced a joint resolution (H. 92). February 26, 1892—Senate. Mr. James McMit1an introduced a joint resolution (S. 55). March 28, 1892—House. H. 92 passed. March 31, 1892—Senate. H. 92 passed. April 12, 1892. ; Joint resolution. Whereas large collections illustrative of the various arts and sciences and facilitating literary and scientific research have been accumulated by the action of Congress through a series of years at the national capital; and Whereas it was the original purpose of the Government thereby to promote research and the diffusion of knowledge, and is now the set- tled policy and present practice of those charged with the care of these collections specially to encourage students who devote their time to the investigation and study of any branch of sauwrodae by allowing them all proper use thereof; and Whereas it is eed that the enumeration of these facilities and the formal statement of this policy will encourage the establish- ment and endowment of institutions of learning at the seat of Govern- ment, and promote the work of education by attracting students to ‘avail themselves of the advantages aforesaid under the direction of competent instructors: Therefore, 1596 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. | Resolved, etc., That the facilities for research and illustration in the following and any other Governmental collections now existing or hereafter to be established in the city of Washington for the pro- motion of knowledge shall be accessible, under such rules and restric- tions as the officers in charge of each collection may prescribe, subject to such authority as is now or may hereafter be permitted by law, to the scientific investigators and to students of any institution of higher education now incorporated or hereafter to be incorporated under the laws of Congress or of the District of Columbia, to wit: 1. Of the Library of Congress. . Of the National Museum. Of the Patent Office. Of the Bureau of Education. Of the Bureau of Ethnology. Of the Army Medical Museum. Of the Department of Agriculture. . Of the Fish Commission. 9. Of the Botanic Gardens. 10. Of the Coast and Geodetic Survey 11. Of the Geological Survey. 12. Of the Naval Observatory. (Stat., XX VII, 395). Gea ee ie.2) LIST OF EMPLOYEES. March 23, 1892—Senate. Mr. E. O. Wotcorr submitted resolution directing heads of several Departments and of the other branches of public service in Washing- ton to transmit lists of all their subordinates, names, legal residences, compensation, and duties, who were on the 1st of March, 1892, employed in Washington, not as laborers or workmen, nor as members of the classified civil service, and were not specifically authorized or appropriated for by law, but were appointed or employed according to the discretion of the official appointing or employing them, and paid from some general or special fund subject to his control, and lists of all persons employed or paid as laborers or workmen who have performed clerical or other higher duty. March 24, 1892—Senate. Mr. E. O. Wotcorr modified his resolution offered March 23, to insert after the word ‘‘ workmen” the words ‘‘or as printers, binders, or pieceworkers.” Adopted. April 5, 1892—Senate. t The Vicr-Presipent (Mr. Levi P. Morton) presented a communi- cation from the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution (S. Mise. Doe. 116): FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. 1597 SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, Washington, D. C., April 5, 1892. Sir: In response to the Senate resolution of March 24, I beg leave to inclose here- with lists of the subordinates employed under the Smithsonian Institution on the lst day of March, 1892, giving the State from which each was appointed or legal residence, the compensation per month, and nature of the duties. Persons employed as laborers are not included. There are none employed under the Smithsonian Institution and paid as laborers who have performed clerical or other higher duty. Very respectfully, yours } 8. P. Lane ery, Secretary. Hon. Levi P. Morton, President of the United States Senate, Washington, D. C. List of persons employed in Washington, D. C., except laborers and workmen; as called for by Senate resolution of March 24, 1892. BY THE ASTROPHYSICAL OBSERVATORY. Compensa- Names. Whence appointed. tion per Duties. month. PIBMOGES WEIN o 22s wes ccewcccenesconeccs Connecticut: 2... = $200.00 | Senior assistant. SCOUT Crs hd Ort a ee Maryland) 2<..:<22-..< 45.00 | Assistant. BY THE BUREAU OF INTERNATIONAL EXCHANGES. * IED GCA IS Ce a Massachusetts .......- $225.00 | Curator. - TES cine Cs a ee er a [Kansas)sccet- ceases 160.00 | Chief clerk. That, TY NG eae ee aes ene District of Columbia. . 120.00 | Clerk. PRISTON VO Wises oasis ecaananiccensciciccone losses GO a eteiescectenes 85. 00 Do. MURIRGO MOMMA tems Soins) eaa caicenseeeeecs'seuete|auee GOL roe settee 80. 00 Do. LAR 12 0, ee ee ee) Pee GOs csascbecien ches 75. 00 Do. NGUOCHM Gos foc cm uanconn Sess sense cnceeasllesva< OO eas csckeewoit wae 75. 00 Do. Pr CUn Gils o sec cca eaiasce boc seek cscinaesen Kentucky .....<6<<.<: 65. 00 Do. LINES OA 02 ee eS a Meee ere ers District of Columbia. . 45.00 | Stenographer. DEMESTA TN Mea Mt earn lnra loins omic mm Wisjaielsielewie siaiorais a. ellle.ciete’s DO Gencaseisjcewasiec 45.00 | Clerk. DAO TERE eno Oa SS Oe ee After sat oll: ae See a 40.00 | Copyist. = IN THE NATIONAL ZOOLOGICAL PARK. LTR Lin tin ga aie ey ee ee New York =22555-:0.- $208.33 | Acting manager of park. ISRIOn CAN Dineen cncusccessuenec de ceetosd Ceca KWansasiac. actcseccaslare 100.00 | Property clerk. BEA HED ed so ac cwicsc sists acleccacvdsesasicees District of Columbia... 50.00 | Clerk engaged on accounts. PERV IOR OM Cl atiiaiae cteime ne eicisicivia sien ws cais esos sate DO cease esos "62.50 Stenographer em- ployed in corre- spondence. PTS TIC DES Se en ee Maryland ............ 25.00 | Office messenger. PISCE WW 5) EM oa icjnintaieya cininisio,~'mielersia,s'ace is ccs tees. se acco aeons ObiGaccsds MHOMmaS). 2. 224 tot tees sees sect ote. District of Columbia. . 175.00 | Curator. 1600 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. List of persons employed in Washington, D. C., except laborers and workmen; as called for by Senate resolution of March 24, 1892—Continued. BY THE NATIONAL MUSEUM—Continued. Compensa- . Names. Whence appointed. tion per Duties. month. Wingaters ds. We sees sso dsecas wos Scta sec cs peekes Maryland (2 s.s6-2s252 20.00 | Messenger. Woltzy G. Watiie sd 2k SR tee va ceeysiesiesaneaes District of Columbia. . 50.00 | Watchman. Wight, CiSu2es. 022-2 Jee See o.oo. etetaente| Sees COE eeeesssese elt 30.00 | Messenger. Yeates; WeSrastesse-s seestans st casenq sees ewes North Carolina....... 133.33 | Assistant curator. Yeatman, Miss!M A: 25= tees eee cs acewas District of Columbia. . 30.00 | Copyist. EXPLANATORY NOTE.—A curator is a scientific expert, and as such is the head of one of the scientifie departments of the Museum. An assistant curator is an officer of scientific attainments, who assists the curator in the scientific and administrative work of the department to which he may be assigned, and who, during the absence of a curator, is called upon to act as the head of the department. An aid assists a curator in minor scientific and administrative work. List of employees of the National Museum on March 1, 1892, paid as laborers or workmen, but performing higher duty, as called for by Senate resolution of March 24, 1892. Name. Whence appointed. Rating and pay. | Nature of service rendered. Bannister, W. F....| District of Columbia........-. Laborer at $40....| Temporary watchman. Referred to Committee on Civil Service and Retrenchment. DAUGHTERS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION. April 5, 1892—House. Mr. W. L. Wirson, of West Virginia, introduced a bill (H. 7889) to incorporate National Society of Daughters of the American Revolution. Referred to Committee on the Judiciary. SELECT COMMITTEE ON SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION. April 8, 1892—House. Mr. JosepH WHEELER introduced resolution: That a select committee consisting of three members be appointed by the Speaker, to be called the Committee on the Smithsonian Institution, to which committee all bills will be referred which refer to the Smithsonian Institution. Referred to Committee on Rules. ‘PERKINS COLLECTION OF COPPER IMPLEMENTS. April 26, 1892—Senate. Mr. Pumetus Sawyer proposed an amendment to sundry civil bill — for 1893 (H. 7520): To enable the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution to purchase from Frederick S. Perkins, of Wisconsin, for the United States National Museum, his collection of prehistoric copper implements, 422 in number, and his collection of 1,000 water-color FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. 1601 drawings of prehistoric copper objects, and 1,000 pen and pencil drawings, with the records and written descriptions of these things, for the sum of $17,000; and in the event the said drawings and drawings and descriptions should be printed and pub- lished by the Smithsonian Institution 50 copies thereof shall be furnished and deliy- ered to the said Frederick 8. Perkins without charge. Referred to Committee on Appropriations. APPROPRIATIONS DISCUSSED. May 12, 1892—House. The sundry civil bill for 1893 under consideration: The Cuarrman (Mr. J. H. Biount). The Chair regrets very much that he can not depart from the order of the committee. Mr. B. A. Entoz. The Chair did not submit to the Committee of the Whole the question of passing these paragraphs over. The Cuarrman. The gentleman is mistaken. Mr. Entor. I did not hear it. I certainly should not have con- sented. I adjourned the special investigating committee in order to be here to offer amendments to this part of the bill at this time. Mr. W. 8. Horman. You will have the opportunity hereafter. Mr. Entor. I do not know whether I shall have an opportunity to be in the House when this part of the bill is taken up hereafter. Mr. Horman. There will be no trouble about that. I suggest that if the gentleman has the amendment prepared the committee may consent now that it be printed. Mr. Entor. I would be very glad to have this matter settled now. The Clerk resumed the reading of the bill: UNDER SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION. National Museum: For continuing the preservation, exhibition, and increase of the collections from the surveying and exploring expeditions of the Government and from other sources, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $120,000: Provided, That all articles imported for the permanent use of the National Museum shall be admitted without the payment of duties. Mr. Wiii1am Coaswetu. I desire to submit a point of order on the proviso just read. The ruling of the Chair upon a similar provi- sion, attached to the appropriation for the Light-House Establish- ment, was that it was not germane; that it changed existing law, and therefore was not inorder. I make the same point upon this proviso. The CuarrMaAn. The Chair sustains the point of order. Mr. CocswELu. I now move to amend so as to make the amount of this appropriation $145,000 instead of $120,000. This increase in the appropriation is made necessary by the fact that in the item as reported the estimate is cut down $15,000, and the ruling of the Chair striking out the proviso makes an additional reduction below the sum absolutely necessary, as the officers of the Museum contend, for the H. Doc. 7382 101 1602 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. safe-keeping of the valuable collections already there. I hope the amendment will be adopted. Mr. Homan and others. Vote! Vote! The question being taken, the amendment was rejected. The Clerk read as follows: For cases, fufniture, fixtures, and appliances required for the exhibition and safe- keeping of the collections of the National Museum, including salaries or compensa- tion of all necessary employees, $10,000. Mr. CocgswELu. I move to amend so as to make the amount of this appropriation $25,000 instead of $10,000. [Cries of ‘‘ Vote!” “Vote!”] | The question being taken, the amendment was rejected. The Clerk read as follows: For expense of heating, lighting, electrical, telegraphic, and telephonic service for the National Museum, $10,000. Mr. CogswELu. I move to amend by striking out ‘*$10,000” and inserting ‘‘$12,000.” I read a note in regard to this matter from the Book of Estimates: This is a provision for the heating and lighting of this Institution. It is necessary to keep the buildings at nearly a uniform temperature throughout the twenty-four hours. Unless this course is followed, as stated last year, the safety of the collec- tions will be endangered. Should the winter prove severe, unless the entire amount asked for is appropriated a deficiency estimate will be found necessary. Now, this is a small matter upon which the estimate can be easily and correctly made. The last bill carried $12,000 for this purpose; that appropriation’ was used because it was found necessary. In this bill we have a cut of $2,000 in the matter of the coal bill and gas bill of this Institution. I hope the amendment will prevail. Mr. H. H. Brncuam. Mr. Chairman, I am in receipt of a communica- tion from Professor Langley on this very point, and I think it empha- sizes the remarks just made by the gentleman from Massachusetts [Mr. Cogswell]. Professor Langley, whose judgment is, of course, entitled to great weight, writes on this subject as a practical every-day question, and says: The amount under this head in the Book of Estimates is $12,000; in the sundry civil bill it is reduced to $10,000. With the latter amount it will be impossible to heat and light the buildings properly during the coming year. With the most stringent economy, the sum of $12,000 has been found inadequate during the present year, and on several occasions some of the employees have been unable to work in their rooms. The number of firemen now employed is four, which is less than it should be for the most efficient management of the heating apparatus; and, with a smaller amount of coal, it will be impossible, as has already been stated, to heat the buildings to a proper temperature. If it is the purpose of the committee to make appropriations for the conduct of this Institution, they can cut as much as they see proper q : FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. 1603 on what they call the subordinate force of the building, cut as much as they see proper as to the compensation of the employees; but in the name of humanity give men who work there at least the con- veniences and the comforts that the humblest workingman demands in his own home. Mr. Hotman. We will make that all right. The question was taken, and on a division (demanded by Mr. Bingham) there were—ayes 33, noes 127. Mr. T. B. Reep. I think if they can not give us explanations they had better give us a quorum. Mr. Coesweu. I demand tellers. Mr. H. C. Lover. I make the point that no quorum has voted, and demand tellers. The CHarrMAN appointed Mr. Lodge and Mr. Holman as tellers. The committee again divided, and the tellers reported—ayes 6, noes 143. Mr. Loper. No quorum. Mr. Reep. Let us have the regular order. The CuarrMAn. The tellers will continue the count until it is “com- pleted. Gentlemen who have not voted will please come forward. Mr. ReEp. But the vote has been announced. The rule provides what shall be done. The CuarrmMan. The Chair understands the rule. The tellers have not completed the count. The tellers reported—ayes 8, noes 160. So the amendment was rejected. The Clerk read as follows: National Zoological Park: For continuing the construction of roads, walks, bridges, water supply, sewerage, and drainage, and for grading, planting, and otherwise improving the grounds of the National Zoological Park, including salaries or com- pensation of all necessary employees, $9,000. Mr. CocswE.tu. Mr. Chairman, I move to strike out in the eighth line, on page 24, the word ‘‘nine” and insert ‘‘fifteen;” so that it will read ‘*$15,000.” Now, there is no disposition whatever on this side of the House to delay the passage of this bill; but all along the line we find that large cuts have been made in the estimates, and from the appropriations of last year; and this House and this country is entitled to learn from the majority of this committee, when a member of the minority in good faith offers an amendment to increase the appropriation to what he honestly believes is the living limit of these Departments, the object of these reductions. We should be told the reasons for these extraordinary cuts. But if they desire to be mute for reasons or purposes of their own, and remain in their seats silent in response to such amendments, or simply ask for 1604 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. a vote on such amendments, not made for any other purposes than those of good faith, why then I ar they will not expedite the bill as rapidly as we expect. Now, here in this half dozen following items on this page are reduc- tions ee to my mind are not justified except upon the theory that you intend to annihilate the Zoological Park. If that is the pur- pose of the majority of the House then let it come up manfully and repeal the act establishing the park, and not by piecemeal, with mouths closed, attempt to starve and bleed this institution to death. My amendment carries up this appropriation to the amount esti- mated as necessary by the officer of that institution, and I hope it will be adopted by the committee. Mr. J. W. Battery. If in order, Mr. Chairman, I move to amend the motion of the gentleman from Massachusetts by striking out the entire paragraph. The CHatrMan. The motion to strike out would not be in order until the text of the paragraph is perfected. The question is on agreeing to the amendment of the gentleman from Massachusetts. The question was taken; and on a division there were—ayes 37, noes 161. 7 Mr. Brnenam. I demand tellers. As long as there is no explanation of these items of reduction we will’call for tellers. Tellers were ordered. Mr. Bryeuam and Mr. Horman were appointed tellers. The committee again divided, and the tellers reported—ayes 4, noes 163. So the amendment was rejected. The Cuarrman. The Clerk will read the next paragraph. Mr. Reep. I understand there is a motion to strike out the para- graph pending somewhere in space. Mr. Battey. I move to amend by striking out all the paragraph which has been read, beginning with line 3 and ending with line 8, on page 24 of this bill. I make that motion, Mr. Chairman, because it does not appear to me that the Federal Government ought ever to have engaged in the business of establishing parks, and providing this or like places of entertainment for the people. But I make it at this particular time in view of the frequently repeated declaration on this floor that there will be a deficiency in the present fiscal year. Not only once, but several times, from members on both sides of this House has this declaration come. Mr. N. Drnexry, Jr. I beg the gentleman’s pardon, not from this side of the House. No gentleman here has made such a statement. Mr. Battey. And I beg the gentleman’s pardon. There are some Democrats on that side of the House. FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. 1605 Mr. Dinetry. But when you use the term ‘‘ both sides of the House” the meaning is obvious that it means the political sides. Mr. Barmy. So far as I am concerned I do not believe that it is ever proper to tax men and women to support monkeys and bears, and if the Treasury vaults were bursting open with the money that had already been wrongfully taken from the people, I should say, rather than misspend it after this fashion, let us emancipate the people from taxation. In view of this deficiency, I have prepared and shall offer, at the conclusion of this bill, an amendment designed to cover it. In order that it may be before the members of this House and that it may be read by them in the Record to-morrow morning, I will ask the Clerk to read the amendment which, in its proper order, I shall pro- pose. I send the amendment to the Clerk’s desk. The Clerk read: That in order to provide for the expenditures authorized by this act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall cause to be engraved and printed an amount of legal-tender Treasury notes, in addition to the amount now authorized by law, equal to the sum of all appropriations herein made, and with said legal-tender Treasury notes he shall pay all charges, obligations, and expenses which may arise under this act. The said legal-tender Treasury notes shall be engraved and printed and be redeemable and be reissued when taken up in the Treasury in all respects as now provided by law for legal-tender Treasury notes. Mr. Barney. Mr. Chairman, we have reached a point where this has become necessary, or at least it is much the best course open to us. Jam not one of those who believe that the Government can or ought to stamp everything and make it money. I do believe, how- ever, that when we find ourselves confronted with a condition where we must either increase our taxes or our interest-bearing debt, or issue Treasury notes, which can not possibly produce the slightest inflation, it is infinitely better that we increase the circulation, thus giving the people at least some benefit from these burdens. And when we do find ourselves confronted with such a condition it is indeed time to call a halt and to relieve the people from burdens so useless as this. This and the subsequent paragraphs in this bill provide for a tax of $29,000 upon the people with no corresponding benefit, unless they will be benefited to know that their public servants are spending their money © to support parks and animals. Mr. J. A. Pickter. Why do you not abolish the Smithsonian Insti- tution while you are about it, too? Mr. Coeswetu. I understand that the gentleman from Texas [Mr. Bailey] has moved to strike out several of these paragraphs. The Cuairman. The gentleman from Texas [Mr. Bailey] moves to strike out the whole paragraph. Mr. Cocswetx. Now, I will ask if there is not a parliamentary diffi- culty in moving to strike out certain portions of the bill which have not yet been read? As the gentleman’s motion includes several para- 1606 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. graphs, no opportunity will be given to amend those paragraphs. We should have the right to do that. Mr. Bartey. If the Chair will permit me, I will say to the gentle- man that my present motion only covers the paragraph which has just been read, but I have indicated that the cost of the garden will be $29,000, and I say that, pursuing the same line, I shall move to strike out each paragraph as it is reached. Mr. B. McMrxurn. I would suggest that all the paragraphs be read to which this motion is to apply. The CHarrmMan. The motion of the gentleman from Massachusetts [Mr. Cogswell] was to strike out $9,000 and insert $15,000, which amendment was lost. Now the gentleman from Texas [Mr. Bailey] moves to strike out that whole paragraph. Mr. McMittiin. I suggest, as the purpose which the gentleman from Texas seeks to accomplish applies to the two succeeding paragraphs, that they be read through. Then if there is a design to offer amend- ments to them, let that be done and let the motion apply to all. Mr. ReEp. Some gentlemen may want to strike out some parts and not others. Different persons have different views of the Con- stitution. Mr. McMiiurn. If my friend from Maine [Mr. Reed] thinks the Constitution is in peril and that this proposition increases that peril, I shall not insist. Nothing is further from me than to discourage any disposition that he may manifest to revere the Constitution. The CuarrMan. Does the gentleman from Texas insist on his motion to strike out? Mr. Barney. I do. The CHatrMANn. Then the question is on the motion of the gentleman from Texas to strike out. Mr. W. H. Burier. Mr. Chairman, the gentleman from Massachu- setts said just before the last vote was taken that the Republicans in this House had no desire to delay this bill. Of course he understands exactly what the Republican side of this House desire, and I know that he would not state it otherwise than truthfully. We know also that the Republicans of this House pride themselves in their obedience to the constitutiona] provision, as they call it, and especially the ex-Speaker has often said that we do not harmonize with the Constitution in the matter of a quorum; but here we have provided in the Constitution that each House may make the rules for its own government, and we have adopted a rule which says— It shall be the duty of each member to be present and vote upon each question put. Now, as the Republican members of this House are always ready to obey the rules, and the gentleman from Massachusetts says they have no desire to delay the bill, then it comes as a matter of fact that every a FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. 1607 Republican in the House must have voted on this question. I find that on the last vote but three of them voted, and I want the people of this country to know that there are but three Republicans present in this House by their own declaration, and a record of it by vote. Mr. ReeEp. Now, that is a very touching statement. I think my friend from Massachusetts [Mr. Cogswell] is not at all right in the position which he has taken; that is, that the gentleman from Indiana [Mr. Holman] should afford an explanation to this - House for his action. He has not any. That is the reason why he is silent. The only explanation that can really be given is a simple one, and he does not like to present it; but I am going to suggest to the House precisely what it is. I am going to do it simply because I have had experience, and have seen this thing time and again. If we could only attract in some way or other the attention of the people of this country to performances like this, I think we would get rid of them; but, unfortunately, if there is anything that this country does not care about, it is the House of Representatives and the Senate. Mr. W. H. Care. That is a fact. Mr. Reep. You can see that by the hands they have recently put it in. Now, I have seen this performance—at least ten times—a great many times under the leadership of a very great man, whose tactics to-day are being imitated by the present chairman of the Committee on Appropriations. Having no reasons to give except the reason of brute force, he gives that. .Three to one—that is the argument in favor of these appropriations. Mr. Butter. It counts just the same. Mr. Rerep. There are three of you to one of us. There is no other reason on the face of the earth except that. Now, what is the purpose demonstrated here? The object, the purpose is, to deceive the people of the United States as to the action of the Democratic party. Mr. J. H. Watxer. That is what I said. Mr. Reep. It is an attempt to obtain the good ail of the American people upon their economic side, without actually benefiting them the least in the world. Nobody knows better than the chairman of the Committee on Appropriations, at this minute, that all these appropri- ations that we are going through now have to be revised, and have got to be added to by the Senate of the United States in accordance with their official duty, which they will have to perform. He knows the Government will not be starved, because the Senate will put on the amendments; and after a decent little performance, with a natural coyness, he will accept many of them—almost all of them. Then he will go to the country and say: ‘‘ Look! see what a virtuous House we had, and what a profligate Senate.” This is the tenth repetition within my recollection of this kind of 1608 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. , business. Is it not too bad for grown men to be doing this? These appropriations come in here with the approval of the Committee on Appropriations. A portion was stricken out under the rules of the House, and they decline to offer the amendment necessary in order to bring them up to the standard they set up themselves. They stand condemned out of their own mouths, and yet here they are. What is the object of it? The object of it is to go to the country with a faise token; to charge the Senate of the United States, and the political party which it represents, with extravagance that these men themselves have justified by their own votes and hands. And you are all going to follow him. This exposition of it would not make any difference, nor have I the slighest hope that I shall attract the attention of the country to it. Mr. G. D. Wisk. You have never said anything more truthful than that. Mr. Reep. I have never said anything more truthful, and I have said a great many truthful things in this House, as the gentleman from Virginia knows. Now, Mr. Chairman, I think we had better go into particulars to show this thing. I sincerely hope the gentleman from Indiana will attempt something that for decency’s sake looks like an explanation. Mr. Hotman. Now, Mr. Chairman, I hope we will have a vote. The CHAIRMAN. The question is on ie motion of the gentleman from Texas [Mr. Bailey]. The amendment was rejected. The Clerk read as follows: For er recting and repairing buildings and inclosures for animals, and for administra- tive purposes, in the National Zoological Park, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $10,000. Mr. Cocswetu. Mr. Chairman, I offer the amendment which I send to the desk. The amendment was read, as follows: Strike out from line 12 the word ‘‘ten’’ and insert ‘‘eighteen;’’ so that it will read ‘‘$18,000.”’ Ir. Coaswetit. Mr. Chairman, this additional appropriation is required to erect the necessary structures for the collection that has already been made for this park. The committee have cut the estimate far below what is necessary to properly provide for and protect the collection, and I again express the hope that some explanation will be given of this extraordinary cut. The question was taken on the amendment of Mr. Cogswell; and the Chairman declared that the noes seemed to have it. Mr. Coeswetu. I ask for a division. The committee divided; and there were—ayes 41, noes 160. Mr. Cocswe ... I ask for tellers. FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. 1609 Tellers were ordered; and the Chairman appointed Mr. CocswEeLi and Mr. Houtman. The committee again divided; and the tellers reported—ayes 14, noes 163. So the amendment was rejected. Mr. Battery. Mr. Chairman, I move to strike out the whole para- graph beginning with line 9 and ending with line 12. I suppose it is useless to ask the House to strike out this paragraph, inasmuch as they have just refused to strike out the preceding one, but I desire to remind Democrats who were in the last Congress that nearly all of them voted then against establishing this park, yet to-day they are refusing to strike out this appropriation for its maintenance. I submit to my friend from Georgia [Mr. Livingston] that it is precisely like voting to tax his constituents and mine to establish a bear garden in the District of Columbia. Mr. L. F. Livrneston. I am with the gentleman entirely. Mr. Barer. I know you are, and lam glad that it is so. ButI want to ask the Democrats of this House how they can justify them- selves to their constituents for having voted away. the public money for such an improper and indefensible object of expenditure as this? Mr. Chairman, so long as we continue this kind of legislation, just so long will the distinguished gentleman from Maine and his associates be justified in standing here and deriding our professions of economy. I am one of those who believe that when you make a declaration you ought to live up to it like men or publicly retract it; and if you fail to do that here, the people will compel you when you go home to answer them why in your resolution you pronounce in favor of economy while by your votes you sustain extravagant appropriations. If Democrats here believe that the Federal Government can not only go a distance of 2,000 miles and establish the great Yellowstone Park as a pleasure resort for the people of the Old World and the wealthy people of this, and spend $75,000 a year on it, producing scandals in the administration of the Government, but also can come to the District of Columbia and take the people’s money, a sacred trust fund, and devote it to such uses as this, then, indeed, we have passed the line that separates our private pleasures from our public affairs. Mr. Hotman. Just a single word, Mr. Chairman. The Committee on Appropriations recommended these items of appropriation purely, I think, upon the ground that the law of the last Congress had pro- vided for these expenditures Mr. Barney. Will the gentleman permit me to ask him a question? Mr. Hoiman. Yes, sir. Mr. Battery. If i animals that are out in this park atone to the people of the country, and if the case is put on that ground, then I say if you submit the question to the people, ninety-nine out of a hundred 1610 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. of them would rather give the animals away than expend another dollar in maintaining them. Mr. Horan. I think that is probably true. The provision which the gentleman now moves to strike out is somewhat different from the one on which the committee voted a while ago. That had relation to the improvement of the grounds, but the paragraph which the gentle- man now proposes to strike out goes to the heart of this matter, because it is the appropriation for buildings, etc., required for the actual administration of the park. The question of striking out this paragraph stands, therefore, upon an entirely different footing from the question in the other case. This and the succeeding paragraph are the ones that are of vital consequence to this Zoological Garden. Con- gress ought never to have established this garden. The Federal Gov- ernment ought not to undertake such enterprises. The State govern- ments do not do it. Parks of this kind are always designed for the © embellishment of cities, and the Federal Government ought to have shrunk from entering upon a kind of expenditure of the public money which every State has virtualky condemned by refraining from it. Great cities establish these parks. The city of Washington at her own expense might well have afforded to establish a park of this kind, but it is a matter with which the Federal Government has nothing to do, and which it ought not have entered into. I ask for a vote. Mr. C. T. Boatner. One question before the gentleman takes his seat. Does he think we are justified in refusing to make an appropriation to execute a law, a valid law of the United States? Mr. Hotman. Hardly, until it is repealed. Mr. Boatner. I thought the gentleman must concede that. A Memper. Is not this one way to repeal the law? Mr. H. C. SNoperass. Mr. Chairman, | do not propose to speak more than a moment on this question. As I understand the Constitution of our country, Congress has no right to appropriate the money of the people for a purpose of this kind. I voted for the motion of the gen- tleman from Texas | Mr. Bailey] to strike out the preceding clause, and I shall vote to strike out this, because I believe it is fundamentally wrong. I do not believe the American people, hundreds and thou- sands of whom are to-day without homes, ought to be taxed to afford shelter and erect homes for snakes, raccoons, opossums, bears, and all the creeping and slimy things of the earth. Mr. Chairman, we would have no right under the Constitution to tax the whole people to build even a home for the homeless or the thousands of shelterless human beings of this country; and I want to know with what propriety this House can claim the right to lay the heavy hand of taxation upon the whole people for the purpose of affording shelter for bears, raccoons, snakes, and all the nasty things that can be gathered together for the edification of the élite of the District of Columbia. 4 | | FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. 1611 Mr. Picker. Are you in favor of perpetuating the Smithsonian Institution / ; Mr. Snoperass. I am in favor of abolishing the institution now under consideration, and abolishing it ut once. When we take up the Smithsonian Institution I will give you an answer as to that. Mr. Loper. Mr. Chairman, as one of the Regents of the Smithso- nian Institution appointed by this House, I wish to say a word in regard to the treatment which the appropriations for the support of that Insti- tution, and also these special appropriations for the park, have received at the hands of the committee. If we are going to do anything about the Zoological Park it is just as well to come squarely up to the ques- * tion, as the gentleman from Texas [Mr. Bailey] proposes, and kill the institution, as it is to starve it to death with the pretense of giving it an appropriation. On the whole, I prefer the plan of the gentleman from Texas, who would refuse all appropriations to the park, to that of the gentleman from Indiana. I think it is a more honest one. But, Mr. Chairman, a word as to the merits of this question. This great park was established by the Fiftieth Congress, when there was a Democratic House. It was continued and maintained by the Fifty- first Congress. It is in line with the general character of the appro- priations which have been made by this Government in the interest of education and science, and I think from some of the observations that I have heard here in regard to these appropriations the cause of educa- tion needs promotion. . The Smithsonian Institution was founded by the bequest of a private individual. Within the last year it has received another bequest of $200,000. The income of those great bequests is spent for the benefit of the people of the United States. The Government of the United States has always helped the Smithsonian Institution in its work in the interest of science and education, and I have never heard or read an adverse criticism upon the appropriations so made. Scientific collec- . tions are part of their work, and among them comes properly a collec- tion of the wild animals of our country, many of which are disappear- ing. If this collection of animals, established in a suitable park, furnishes pleasure and amusement to the people of Washington and to thousands of other people who come here from all over the coun- try, I am heartily glad of it, and I believe the American people thoroughly approve of it. When this park was established it was placed by Congress under the direction of the Smithsonian Institution. The officers of that Institu- tion did not seek this duty; they did not ask to be intrusted with it; but the park was put in their hands by Congress. It has been admin- istered honestly and economically. But the appropriations as proposed in this bill would make it impossible to continue this work. It would be unsafe to undertake to maintain it on such appropriations as this committee now offers. Not only would the animals starve, but they 1612 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. could not be properly guarded, and persons visiting the park would be in danger. I submit, Mr. Chairman, that unless we are prepared to abandon all appropriations in the interest of education and science, which it has been the settled policy of the Government to promote, there is no reason for slaughtering this institution. When this House, which within a week has passed a river and harbor bill carrying millions upon millions of dollars, turns round and without a word, in order, I suppose, to compensate for such expenditures, undertakes to cut down a beggarly appropriation of a few thousands to be expended in the interest of science and popular education, it is guilty of hypocrisy of the meanest kind. Mr. Battey. Mr. Chairman, in reply to the suggestion of the gen- tleman from Massachusetts that somebody needs to be educated, I have this to say: That the crying need in this House is not for education in books, but for an education that would enable members to distinguish between what is ours and what we hold in trust. If I desire to give for the pleasure or the profit or the education of people in this Dis- trict something belonging to myself—if I desire to make a benevolent or charitable gift, as was done in the bequest of the Smithsonian Insti- tution, there can be no ground for objection or question; but when a great Government puts its hands in my pocket and against my will exacts tribute for the mere amusement and gratification of others, it is downright robbery and injustice. I want to say to him, besides, that I sat here and saw this House vote down a proposition to buy schoolbooks for the-children of the public schools, and now, for the sake of education, as they claim, they propose to maintain a bear garden! I voted with the majority on that occasion, and I: regret that the majority does not vote with me on this. I submit, Mr. Chairman, that if we must enter upon the work of educating the people—if the Federal Government is to become a great eleemosynary and educational institution—let us go about it in a proper manner and establish schools and send teachers to take charge of them and teach the children. Sir, what man will be wiser because you maintain bears and monkeys and snakes in a public park here? What woman will derive refinement or grace from such an institution? What child will be taught to tread the path of virtue our fathers trod before us by this particular process of education? Let us meet the matter directly and openly, and determine, first, if the Federal Gov- ernment should support this institution for the purpose which gentle- men claim. [Here the hammer fell. ] The CuarrmMan. The question is on agreeing to the motion to strike out the paragraph. FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. 16138 The question was taken; and on a division there were—ayes 48, noes 88. So the amendment was rejected. The Clerk read: For care, subsistence, and transportation of animals for the National Zoological Park, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees and general incidental expenses not otherwise provided for, $10,000; in all, $29,000, one-half of _which sum shall be paid from the revenues of the District of Columbia and the other half from the Treasury of the United States; and hereafter all estimates for the National Zoological Park shall, each year, be submitted in the annual estimates for the expenses of the Government of the District of Columbia. Mr. Coeswetu. I move to strike out, in line 16, ‘‘$10,000” and insert ‘‘ $17,500.” The question was taken; and on a division there were—ayes 30, noes 141. Mr. Cogswetu. I demand tellers. Tellers were not ordered, there being 27 members only voting in favor thereof. So the amendment was rejected. May 16, 1892—House. The House resolved itself into Committee of the Whole for the pur- pose of further considering the sundry civil bill for 1893, with Mr. R. E. Lester in the chair. The CuatrMan. The House is in Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union, and the clerk will read the next paragraph. The clerk read: International exchanges: For expenses of the system of international exchanges between the United States and foreign countries, under the direction of the Smith- sonian Institution, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $12,000. Mr. H. H. Brncuam. Mr. Chairman, I offer an amendment to that clause. The Clerk read: On page 25, line 7, strike out ‘‘twelve thousand’’ and insert ‘‘seventeen thou- sand.’’ Mr. BrneHam. On that, Mr. Chairman, I desire to say a few words. In the discussion of this bill I have no desire in any way to retard or delay its consideration and passage; but having been a member of the subcommittee, and having listened daily for almost a month to hearings on the part of the heads of the various bureaus of the Goy- ernment, with no disposition to delay, I feel it is due, that the Com- mittee on Appropriations having fully considered these items, the Committee of the Whole should also have some knowledge upon them, and if you see proper to reduce or adhere to the reduction recom- mended in the bill, I, of course, can enter no demurrer. 1614 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. The item of international exchanges between this and other coun- tries is an item of some dignity and some character. It is part and parcel of treaty stipulations with many governments of the world, signed in 1886 by the President, and heretofore carried out in accord- ance with the provisions of the statute. I have in my district many distinguished professional and scientific men, who for a generation have had relations with the Smithsonian Institution, knowing fully its value and its worth to the scientific world, as well as to the higher _ conditions of general education. I hold in my hand a letter from Professor Langley, the head of that Institution, wherein he says to me: I can not express to you too emphatically the injury that will result to the public interests intrusted to the Smithsonian Institution if the serious reductions contem- plated in the bill as now reported shall be effected. The estimates have been made with care, not with the idea of asking for sums necessary to accomplish at once all that is desired, but to provide for maintaining the present efficiency and adequate care of these Government interests upon the most economical basis possible, and with but little allowance for natural growth and improvement. The necessary expenses are, moreover, retained at a low figure by reason of the fact that a large portion of the Smithsonian Institution is occupied by the Government, and at the expense of the private funds of the Institution. The Smithsonian Institution having established in 1852 an interna- tional exchange service for the purpose of facilitating the exchange of scientific writings between governmental departments, societies, and individuals in different parts of the world, carried on this service for many years at the expense of its own private fund, transmitting pub- lications of the United States Government as well as those purely sci- entific. It is now more formally charged with this duty in carrying out the provisions of a treaty ratified by the President of the United States in 1886, and is chiefly engaged in transporting purely govern- mental and not scientific documents. | An appropriation is made by Congress direct to the Smithsonian Institution, and a portion of the expense is also met from specific or contingent appropriations, paid by various Government bureaus to the Institution. This does not cover the entire cost of the service as the Institution is under obligations to most of the trans-Atlantic steamship companies for the privilege of free freight, accorded in the early his- tory of the exchange in recognition of its disinterested services to science. [From letter of Secretary Langley to Mr. Bingham, under date of April 2, 1892. ] [The appropriation for the year 1890-91 was $17,000, the total cost of the service $20,400—the pay roll of necessary employees being over $14,000—and this I repeat does not allow for the full payment of freight. For the current year, 1891-92, the same appropriation of $17,000 was made and the expenses will be restricted to the same scale as in previous years. The items of expenditure for the year 1890-91 are contained in the following clip- ping from the report of the secretary: FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. 1615 It has been urged that the entire exchange appropriation be included in one item, instead of being contained in different bills, and that a provision be made for carry- ing out a second treaty, proclaimed by the President of the United States on January 15, 1889, for the immediate exchange of Official Journals, ete., for which no appro- priation has yet been made, and for which purpose it is estimated that $2,000 would be sufficient. The estimate submitted therefore for the year 1891-92 was $23,000, omitting the increase in freight facilities desired. The sundry civil bill (H. 7520), now reported, allows $12,000. With this sum it is evident that the exchange serv- ice can not bé carried on even in its present limited scope, and it should also be remembered that the expense is far below what would be required for the independ- ent conduct of such a service, not only on account of the freight privilege, but because the experience and facilities of the Institution, perhaps the most extensive in the world, are given together with the service of its officials without charge, and also because the exchange offices occupy a very considerable portion of the Smith- sonian building, without consideration of rent, heating, lighting, etc. Not only has no profit accrued to the Institution for that portion of the service which has been for the exchange of purely Government publications, such as the Congressional Record, and which is not connected with its scientific work, but it has in past years advanced from its private funds the sum of $45,175.82 for such Government exchanges for which it has never been reimbursed. ] Oy The sundry civil bill now reported allows $12,000. I do not know, sir, whether this committee, in its judgment and con- clusion upon this bill, is antagonistic to all the scientific works that the Government in the past has determined to aid, assist, and advance; but from the conclusion you have reached when you have struck $71,000 from the appropriation for the Coast and Geodetic Survey, _ when you have struck upwards of $200,000 from the Geological Sur- vey, when you have struck radically at the Fish Commission, also light-houses and beacons, and when you now strike at this other scien- tific Institution which the Government has been aiding for a genera- tion, the Smithsonian Institution, it does seem to me that it is well for the scientific world to know that you have no sympathy with those . scientific labors which the Government has been wisely aiding for many years, built up and developed to the highest conditions of effi- ciency and usefulness. We hear a great deal in this House about the agricultural sections of the country. The agriculturists of this country know that the highest and safest growth and development of agriculture goes hand in hand with science; science always leading, and agriculture following, reaping benefit and wealth. Let it be known, then, that in this Dem- ocratic House of Representatives consideration of the Smithsonian Institution as in the consideration of coordinate questions of science connected with the Government, this bill radically, almost from the root up, has destroyed and weakened the proper administration of not only one but all of these scientific bureaus of the Government. The CuarrMan. The question is on the amendment of the gentleman from Pennsylvania [Mr. Bingham]. Mr. W.S. Horman. Mr. Chairman, I only wish to say to my friend 1616 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. from Pennsylvania [Mr. Bingham] that this appropriation of $12,000 is quite a reasonable one. My friend must bear in mind that we are deal- ing now with a state of things the like of~which has not existed in this country for many years; we have not got the money in sufficient quan- tity to justify a larger appropriation. That is the only answer I have to make. The amendment of Mr. Bingham was rejected. The Clerk read: North American Ethnology: For continuing ethnological researches among the American Indians, under the direction of the Smithsonian Institution, including sal- aries or compensation of all necessary employes, $35,000. Mr. C. L. Mosrs. Mr. Chairman, I move to strike out the paragraph which has just been read, and I ask the members of the House to read for themselves that paragraph, which proposes to appropriate $35,000 ‘*for continuing ethnological researches among the American Indians.” I move, sir, to strike the paragraph from'the bill, because I know that if the people, not only of my district, but of the entire country, were here to-day, they would vote ten to one that they were not willing to tax themselves $35,000 per annum to hold inquests over the bones of Indians who died before Columbus landed on the shores of America. I understand that we have already appropriated, or squandered, about $150,000 for these ‘* researches.” Let us respect the will of the people who sent us here, and vote down such appropriations. 1 suppose that the gentleman from Maine [Mr. Reed] or ‘‘the scholar in politics” from Massachusetts [Mr. Lodge] will demand of us, according to their custom, a better reason why this appropriation should be stricken out. They seem to assume that the House is responsible to them and not to the people. The distinguished gentleman from Harvard University will doubt- less again charge that we are opposed to education because we are opposed to voting such appropriations as this. On last Thursday, when the gentleman from Texas [Mr. Bailey] moved to strike out the appropriation of $29,000 to maintain a zoological park for the benefit of the people of Washington, he raised his hands in holy horror, and said that such speeches showed that there were some sections of the country where the cause of education needed promotion. If that is the way we are to educate our people, why not take your bears and your elephants and put them in the hands of Barnum or Bailey and send them all over the country so that the people of the entire country may receive the benefits of your glorious ‘‘ education?” Mr. Chairman, we are told that we should not strike out hess **beg- garly” sums. That is the cry upon every item. Take the value of the entire wheat crop of the North and the cotton crop of the South, and you will still lack $100,000,000 to pay the aggregate of these ‘* beg- garly sems.” You spend $16 per capita of population. Georgia’s FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. 1617 pro rata of the tax is thirty-two millions. Her cotton crop does not sell for that much money. Iam opposed to voting one dollar to sus- tain the Smithsonian Institution above the income which actually belongs to it from the fund provided by the donor. Now, sir, where are we to begin cutting down these beggarly amounts if we do not begin at such things as this? Why not begin here? Where can there be a more appropriate place? We have already expended $140,000 for the purpose of this ethnological inves- tigation; we have $140,000 worth of ethnological knowledge, and surely that is enough until we can digest the information already obtained. The CHarrman. The time of the gentleman has expired. Mr. Brncuam was recognized. Mr. Mosss. I move to strike out the last word. The Cuatrman. The Chair has recognized the gentleman from Penn- sylvania. Mr. Moszs. I would like to complete my remarks. The CuarrmMANn. The Chair will recognize the gentleman hereafter. Mr. Bryewam. Mr. Chairman, this is another one of the provisions for what may be called a part of the scientific work of the Govern- ment. I have in my hand a telegram from the Public Printer in reply to my inquiries addressed to him a few days ago in order to ascertain to what degree of popularity the reports of the Bureau of Ethnology had reached before the people, as well as to ascertain the action of Congress heretofore on that subject. Of the reports pub- lished I find that there have been 15,000 copies, in addition to the usual number, which is 1,734, published for distribution. I shall address myself to this subject briefly, because I have little hope of changing the view of the committee in regard to this appropriation. It would seem that the popular expression of the policy in Committee of the Whole has been to cut out of the bill rather than to insert any- thing in it. The work of the Bureau of Ethnology is practically confined to the United States, and right in connection with that I desire to state that the appropriation in this bill of $35,000 is the lowest sum of money appropriated for this service at any date since 1885. In 1885, 1886, 1887, 1888, 1889, 1890, and 1891 the appropriations were $40,000, and for the present year—the current year—it was $50,000. This bill cuts lower than you cut during those years when you had control of the Government not only in this House but in the administration of the Executive chair. You cut this bill, without rhyme or reason, $5,000 lower than during the four years of your administration in this House and in the Executive chair. Mr. J. D. Sayers. Will the gentleman yield for a question? Mr. Brneuam. Certainly. He Dac, Tae 102 1618 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. ‘Mr. Sayers. Can the gentleman point to a period when the public funds have ever been so small as they are to-day, in comparison with the expenditures? Mr. Brnenam. The gentleman from Texas well knows that there is no trouble to-day with the appropriations with reference to the future or the next fiscal year. That question has been fully debated on this floor. Mr. Sayers. A very distinguished member of your party in the other branch of Congress does not believe that the danger is imminent or threatening. Mr. Brneuam. Well, the Senate will keep within the limits. There was an intimation given out in that body a few days ago, I know. But I submit this, as I have given the matter some considerable attention, with a view to placing this question clearly before the committee. The work of the Bureau of Ethnology is practically confined to the United States. When America was discovered the Indians or aborig- inal inhabitants of the United States were organized in many hundreds of tribes, speaking many hundreds of languages; but these languages belong to a little more than sixty radically distinct stocks. The arts, the languages, the institutions, the mythologies, and religions of these . peoples were various, and prove on investigation to be of intense interest to the scholars of America and to the world. These peoples are rapidly disappearing as tribes. Their arts are almost wholly transformed; their institutions by which tribal society was maintained are almost lost; their languages are rapidly disappearing—some are lost; their mythologies and religions are vanishing. If any consistent, truthful, and thorough account of these peoples is ever obtained it must be obtained now; already much is gone and much is obscured, and with every year more and more disappears. These are the sibylline leaves of American history, in which all the people are interested. The discoveries made by the Bureau of Eth- nology are rapidly diffused into the literature of the country, and its reports become standard works in all the schools, from the lowest to the highest. It may be fairly said that universally the people are interested in the preservation of this historic material’ The appro- priation of $50,000 made for the current year is inadequate to prop- erly carry on these investigations, and to cut the work down is greatly to cripple it. To cut the work down temporarily is to lose the services of trained men, which is necessarily a serious loss. lam free to say I do not expect this approprition to be added to, but I must repeat that my constituents are largely interested in this kind of work, and in their behalf I protest against cutting down this appropriation to a figure which is lower than at any period since 1885. The Committee of the Whole resumed its session, FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. 1619 Mr. H. C. Snoperass. Mr. Chairman, for the purpose of saying a few words on the pending paragraph, I move a pro forma amendment. I think this item should be stricken from the bill. I believe that it is a useless expenditure. I do not believe it will add anything to science ~ or education to expend $35,000 to send a set of political employees over the country to dig into Indian mounds and publish accounts of of whatever they may find there. Now, I desire to ask the Chairman of the Committee on Appropriation [Mr. Holman] whether, in his opinion, this item is necessary to the public good, or whether it is not a useless expenditure of the public funds? Mr. Hotman. After my friend has concluded I will say a word on that point. Mr. Snoperass. Well, I have said about all that I want to say. I can not see that any good is to result from this appropriation. - Mr. Hotman. Mr. Chairman, for many years prior to the present year we have appropriated $40,000 for this service. For the present fiscal year $50,000 was appropriated. Every gentleman here is, of course, familiar with the character of this work with reference to American ethnology. It is an enterprise carried on under the Smith- sonian Institution; but Major Powell, who is connected with the Inte- — rior Department, and is one of the most accomplished scientists that our age has produced, has the supervision and control of the work. It has certainly been well performed. I think that no publication made by the Government, especially of a scientific character, has been more valuable or more interesting; and if any such work should be, at the present time, conducted to its conclusion, this is a work of that kind. It is in progress; it is approaching completion. I believe that ten volumes embracing results of this work have already been pub- lished. Some of the most valuable matters connected with our history in connection with the Indian tribes, their cessions of land to the United States, etc., are embodied only in this publication. In preparing this bill we have thought that under the circumstances the appropriation should be reduced from $50,000 to $35,000, the amount named in the bill. The gentleman from Pennsylvania [ Mr. Bingham] complains that this is not enough; the gentleman from Georgia [|Mr. Moses] complains that it is $35,000 too much, that the whole item ought to be stricken out. I think that the Committee on Appropriations have acted reasonably and prudently in leaving this item at $35,000. If the Committee of the Whole, however, should think it can be properly reduced, the Committee on Appropriations, of course, will not object; but I hope the entire item will not be struck out. I think the material on hand ought to be made use of, and this work completed as soon as practicable. Mr. C. E. Hooxrr. I want to ask the chairman of the Committee on Appropriations [Mr. Holman] if he will be kind enough to state to this House when this Bureau was created, how long it has been 1620 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. in existence, what appropriations have been made for it during the several years of its existence, and what appropriations were made by the last Congress. I have been very much struck with the somewhat feeble defense which the chairman of the Committee on Appropriations has made of this item of the bill, contenting himself with expressing: the hope that the Committee of the Whole would not strike it all out. If the Appropriations Committee have acted wisely, economically, and properly in the presentation of this reduced appropriation of $35,000, we might expect it would find at the hands of the chairman of the com- mittee and the body of the committee a proper representation and defense before the House. Mr. Sayers. For the information of the gentleman from Mississippi [Mr. Hooker] I will state that the appropriation for this Bureau (if it may be called a bureau) has been $40,000 from and including the fiscal year 1885 until the present fiscal year, when it is $50,000. Mr. Hortman. Oh, away back of that this work commenced—about the year 1879. Mr. Sayers. I am speaking of the appropriations. Mr. Hotman. I think my friend will find that the appropriations have been about $40,000 a year since about 1879. That is my recol- lection. Mr. Sayers. I speak only of the period since 1885, in regard to which I have knowledge. Mr. W. S. Hortman. I ought to correct the statement I just made. The earlier appropriations were less than those made since; they were about $20,000 a year. Mr. Sayers. If the gentleman from Indiana will allow me, I will state only such facts as I know. What may be in the region of spec- ulation, I will leave others to speak of. The annual appropriation since the year 1885, including that year, and up to the present fiscal year, was $40,000. For the present fiscal year, however, the appropriation was increased $10,000, the reason of the increase being this: Major Powell said he was getting old, expected to retire from the service in a very short time, and that he wanted to complete the work before he retired; hence Congress, upon the rec- ommendation of the Committee on Appropriations, gave $50,000 for the present fiscal year. That is the only reason I know why the appro- priation was increased from $40,000 to $50,000. Mr. Hooxrer. What is the reason for decreasing it now from $40,000 to $35,000? Mr. Sayers. Because, in the judgment of the majority of the com- mittee, $35,000 is an abundance. Mr. Hooxerr. That is the opinion of the committee now? Mr. Sayers. Yes, sir; a majority of the committee think that $35,000 is amply sufficient. FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. 1621 Mr. Hooker. I merely wanted to get an expression of opinion from the committee that they believe in their own bill. Mr. Sayers. I certainly believe in it, for one. Mr. Hotman. Well, I am perfectly content with the $35,000, but I shall make no fuss about it. Mr. L. M. Mier. Is it regarded by the committee as a worthy object, for which this appropriation should be continued 4 Mr. Saynrs. I think so, until this work shall have been completed. I believe it ought to be completed. There is a large amount of mate- rial on hand that ought to be published and put in book form for dis- tribution throughout the country, and if you strike this appropriation out, of course this material can not be utilized. Mr. Mosrs. Mr. Chairman, I move to strike out the last word. If there has been any reason given why this money should be expended, I do not think that the House has heard it. Indeed, Mr. Chairman, to sit here and witness the squandering of money upon such items as this is enough to fatigue human indignation. If you are determined to spend this money, spend it for something that the people want. They would infinitely prefer that you give them something they need, such as the book on Diseases of the Horse. Should you leave it to them they would say, ‘‘Away with your ‘ethnological researches’ and spend our money for something we need.” No reason has been given why we should appropriate this money, except that $40,000 has already been wasted annually upon it. I say that is a reason why we should not put another dollar there. The people of the country are not in favor of such appropriations. We are told that this is in the interests of education, and that education is good for the people. You might as well tell me that we can ie priate money for religion. Religion is to the interests of the people; but we have no right rita the Constitution of our country to appropriate the people’s money to support churches, schools, or colleges, however worthy they may be. Neither Georgia nor Massachusetts nor Maine nor any of the States of the Union are clamoring for any such legislation by this House; and I call upon every member to voice the sentiment of his people. If we do not vote as they wish us to vote, how can you have a representative government? Mr. Hotman. I wish to occupy the attention of the committee but for a moment, to havea paragraph of the appropriating act of the sun- dry civil bill for the year 1880 read. It will explain the origin of this - work. The Clerk read: For completing and preparing for publication the contributions to North Ameri- can Ethnology, under the Smithsonian Institution, $20,000: Provided, That all the archives, records, and materials relating to the Indians of North America, collected 1622 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. by the Geographical and Geological Survey of the Rocky Mountain Region, shall be turned over to the Smithsonian Institution, that the work may be completed and prepared for publication under its direction: Provided, That it shall meet the approval of the Secretary of the Interior and of the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. Mr. Hortman. Mr. Chairman, for some time the appropriation was $20,000. From the year 1885 down to the present time, as has already been remarked, it has been $40,000, and was increased to $50,000 for the current year, for the reason given by the gentleman from Texas [Mr. Sayers]. I think the gentleman from Georgia [Mr. Moses] is mistaken in one thing at least. This is really a very valuable work. It is one of those things that may he postponed temporarily; but the material-has been gathered together. The work has extended beyond the original purpose, as is manifest from the reading of the paragraph which has been read, but it has always been a valuable and instructive work. Every successive volume has been, if possible, still more interesting and valuable than its predecessors. I think the work is coming to a close. I doubt whether any further appropriation will be required, although I am not certain as to that, for I have not talked with Major Powell upon the subject. But at an early period this work will be completed, and I think the Committee on Appropriations have acted with entire fairness and good judgment in proposing an appropriation of $35,000 for this work. Mr. Moses. Will the gentleman yield for a question ? Mr. Hotman. Certainly. Mr. Mosss. I understood the gentleman to say that this is one of those appropriations that may be postponed. Does not the gentleman believe it to be the duty of this House, in view of the situation of the finances of the Government, to postpone everything that can be post- poned ¢ Mr. Hotman. Well, I think that works of actual value ought to be continued in a fair degree. I think there ought to be a reduction all along the line, and the Committee on Appropriations have indicated that by this reduction of $15,000. Mr. Moses. Does the gentleman not believe, further, that the Com- mittee on Appropriations have cut down the appropriations for things which the people desire more than they do the work of this Bureau? For instance, for opening up the public lands in the West. Mr. Hortman. I can not say as to that. I think this is almost as valuable as the surveys of the public lands, especially when we remem- ber the fact that there are already 129,000,000 acres of land surveyed and undisposed of, sufficient in area to form seven or eight States. Mr. Hooxer of Mississippi. ‘Mr. Chairman, I am glad I have evoked from the Committee on Appropriations some explanation and appro- EE ——— ee EE ee ee eee FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. 1623 bation of their own bill. It seems to me, sir, that it is a very singular proposition now to propose to abandon this scientific investigation, which was instituted originally for the purpose of inquiring into the habits, manners, history, and race features of that wonderful people who once dominated this country. I am glad to see that the appro- priation meets the approbation of my economical friend, the chairman of the Committee on Appropriations; and the appeal which the gen- tleman from Georgia [Mr. Moses] has made to the new members here for the purpose of preventing the continuation of this scientific work, it seems to me, if legitimately extended, might tear down your splen- did Smithsonian Institution, and leave all the great works that science has collected and deposited there to the worms, to rust and to rot. I think, sir, it is one of the most important scientific investiga- tions that the Government has entered upon. It has been conducted with rare ability by Major Powell, who is at the head of this Bureau. With wonderful physical exertion, he has ridden thousands of miles on horseback every year, as the head of this Institution, for the pur- pose of making this investigation, wherever an Indian mound or an Indian device has been erected, and he has given to the civilized world the history of these people that would probably be lost. It seems to me, Mr. Chairman, as a matter of economy, it would be an act of unwisdom to stop this scientific investigation or reduce the appropriations necessary to its proper conduct and its final suecess- ful completion. _ Mr. Horman. Mr. Chairman, I hope we will now have a vote on the motion to strike out. The CuarrmMan. The question is on the amendment of the gentleman from Georgia [Mr. Moses] to strike out this paragraph. The question was taken and the CuarrMAN announced that the noes seemed to have it. Mr. Mosss. I call for a division, Mr. Chairman. The committee divided; and there were—-ayes, 27; noes, 105. So the amendment was rejected. January 23, 1893—House. In considering the sundry civil bill for 1894, Mr. Witt1am CogswELL remarked: Mr. Chairman, in this bill the Smithsonian Institution is again the victim of a niggardly parsimony. NATIONAL SOCIETY OF COLONIAL DAMES OF AMERICA. May 25, 1892—House. Mr. J. E. Reysurn introduced bill (H. 9016) to incorporate the National Society of the Colonial Dames of America. Referred to Committee on Education. 1624 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. May 26, 1892—Senate. Mr. J. D. Cameron introduced bill (S. 3215) to incorporate the National Society of the Colonial Dames of America: Be it enacted, etc., That Emily B. Banning (Mrs. Henry E. Banning), M. Louisa Spruance, Miss Spottswood, Mrs. W. P. Johnston, and Mrs. John B. Rodney, of Delaware; Deborah Brown Coleman (Mrs. G. Dawson Coleman), Elizabeth Duane Gillespie, Fanny Hollingsworth Arnold (Mrs. Crawford Arnold), Elizabeth McKean (Mrs. Thomas McKean), and Julia Rush Biddle, of Pennsylvania; Elizabeth Alford Smith, Mary Dickinson, Caroline E. Nixon, Mrs. Cleaveland Hetson, and Mrs. Elmer E. Green, of New Jersey; Anne Smith Von Kapff (Mrs. Frederick Von Kapff), Ellen Howard Bayard (Mrs. Richard Bassett Bayard), Eleanor Rogers Goldsborough (Mrs. George Robbins Goldsborough), Emilie McKim Reed (Mrs. William Reed), Mrs. Rebecca Chapman, and Mrs. Eugene Blackford, of Maryland, and Florence Kidder, of North Carolina, trustees of the said society, and their associates and suc- | cessors, are hereby created a body corporate and politic, by the name and title of the National Society of the Colonial Dames of America, for patriotic, historical, and educational purposes. The particular business of the said society is the collection and preservation of relics, manuscripts, and traditions of the founders and builders of the thirteen original States of the Union, the perpetuation of the memory cf their deeds and achievements, the promotion of celebrations of great historic events of national importance, the diffusion of information on all subjects concerning Ameri- can history, and the cultivation of the spirit of patriotism and reverence for the founders of American constitutional liberty. Said society is authorized to hold real and personal estate in the District of Columbia so far only as may be necessary to its lawful ends to an amount not exceeding the limits prescribed by law; and it may adopt a constitution and make by-laws not inconsistent with law. Said society shall have its principal office in the city of Washington, and may hold its annual meeting in such places as the trustees thereof shall designate. Said society shali report annually to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution concerning its proceedings, and said Secretary shall communicate to Congress the whole of said mepOrs or such portion thereof as he shall see fit. Referred to Committee on Library. AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION REPORT. June 6, 1892—Senate. The PresiIpENT pro tempore (Mr. CHarues F. MAnperson) laid before the Senate a communication from the Secretary of the Smith- sonian Institution transmitting the annual report of the American Historical Association for the year 1891. Ordered to lie on the table and be printed. ; February 27, 1893—Senate. The Vick-PresipEnt (Mr. Levi P. Morton) laid before the Senate a communication from S. P. Langley, Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, transmitting, in accordance with law, the annual report of the American Historical Association for the year 1892. Referred to Committee on Printing. March 2, 1893—Senate. Mr. Cuarutes F. Manperson, from Committee on Printing, sub- mitted report (S. 1871) on printing the report for 1892, with the recommendation that the usual number be printed: | ; FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. 1625 This report is made in accordance with the act of incorporation of the American Historical Association, approved January 4, 1889. This act requires that the association shall report annually to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution concerning its proceedings and the condition of historical study in America. * * * * * * * The reports of 1890 and 1891 have been printed. The former con- tained 310 and the latter 496 pages. The report for 1892 will contain about the same number of pages as that of 1891, and will cost $1,322. Resolution to print the usual number passed. REPORT OF SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION. June 13, 1892—House. Mr. JoserH WHEELER offered concurrent resolution to print Report of Smithsonian Institution and National Museum for year ending June 30, 1891. Referred to Committee on Printing. July 14, 1892—Senate. . Mr. R. L. Grsson introduced concurrent resolution to print 19,000 extra copies of Report of the Smithsonian Institution and National Museum for year ending June 30, 1891, 7,000 for the Smithsonian Institution and 3,000 for the Museum. Referred to Committee on Printing. July 21, 1892—Senate. Mr. J. R. Hawxey, from Committee on Printing, submitted report (S. 1035), on Senate concurrent resolution with certain proposed amendments, and as thus amended recommend that it do pass: In line 3 strike out ‘‘19,000” and insert ‘* 10,000.” In line 4 strike out ‘‘3,000” and insert ‘*1,000.” In line 5 strike out ‘‘6,000 ” and insert ‘* 2,000.” In line 6 strike out ‘*‘7,000” and insert ‘*5,000.” In line 7 strike out ‘*3,000” and insert ‘* 2,000.” These changes make the resolution conform to bill (8. 1549), provid- ing for the public printing and binding and the distribution of public documents, passed by the Senate January 12, 1892, and reported favor- ably by the House Committee on Printing. . The cost of printing 10,000 copies, as proposed in the amended reso- lution, will be $15,200. _ Passed. August 5, 1892—House. Mr. Wituiam M. McKare, from Committee on Printing, submitted report (H. 2141) on Senate concurrent resolution of July 21, with the recommendation that it do pass, the cost of printing 10,000 copies to be $15,200. Passed. 1626 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. December 8, 1892—House. Public Printing bill under consideration. Mr. James D. Ricnarpson. In the Smithsonian Report there is a reduction of from 19,000 to 10,000 copies. . Mr. Joun A. PickLER. What is the estimate as to the number of volumes or documents that this will take away froma member? How much does it cut down the number to be distributed? How many less documents will a member have for distribution than he has now? Mr. Ricuarpson. Not one single solitary scrap of paper will be taken from a member which he has now. Mr. Pickter. Where does all this reduction come in on the ethno- logical reports and the reports of the Smithsonian Institution? Is not the number of them cut down considerably ? Mr. Ricuarpson. Yes. Mr. Pickier. Then it does curtail the number which a member can get. Mr. RicHarpson. The law will curtail the number printed. That is all that is done. Mr. Pickier. That is the question Iam asking. How much will it curtail the list of documents that a member will be entitled to send out? Mr. Rrcnarpson. In the case of the ethnological reports Mr. Pickter. Well, taking everything together. Mr. RicHarpson. I have not made any estimate in that respect. It cuts down the number largely, and there is no other way to reduce the printing except by cutting down the number printed. Mr. Ricuarp P. BLanp. Cut it down one-half, and that would not be too much. Mr. Ricwarpson. That is what we have done. We have cut down the Ethnological Report 8,000. Mr. Pickiter. From the list the gentleman read here, it seems that they struck the scientific departments of the Government altogether. Mr. RicHarpson. Oh, no. Mr. Picker. I should be glad if the gentleman could state from - his list the number of the Smithsonian Reports. Mr. Ricuarpson. I do not know what the number is, as I have not my figures on that document before me. February 6, 1893—Senate. Mr. J. S. Morrtiyi introduced concurrent resolution, ‘‘to print 10,000 extra copies of the Reports of the Smithsonian Institution and of the National Museum for the year ending June 30, 1892, in two octavo volumes, 1,000 copies for the Senate, 2,000 for the House, 5,000 for the Smithsonian Institution, and 2,000 for the National Museum.” Referred to Committee on Printing. . | : ee eeeeEEeEeEeeEeEeEEeEeeEEeEeEeEeeEEeEEE a ee ee FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. 1627 February 8, 1893—-Senate. Mr. Cuartes F. MAanperson, from Committee on Printing, sub- _ mitted report (S. 1278) on concurrent resolution introduced in Senate, February 6, with the recommendation that it do pass: The provisions of the resolutions respecting the number to be printed and distribution conform to Senate bill 1549, providing for the public printing and binding and the distribution of public documents now in conference committee. The cost of the printing and binding will be $18,000. Mr. Manperson. This is the regular report of the Smithsonian Institution and the National Museum, and the number provided for accords with the public printing bill, which has passed both Houses of Congress. Mr. F. M. Cockreti. Would there be any reasonable chance of getting these publications issued a little closer to the time they pretend to represent; that is, to bring them up within a short time of the cur- rent year? Mr. Manperson. I hope it may be so. Of course that depends very largely upon the amount of labor which may be thrown upon the Government Printing Office. The Senator must be aware of the fact that the Public Printer is the head of that concern and not the Com- mittee on Printing. The amount of work thrown upon the Govern- ment Printing Office during the sessions of Congress is very great, and of course matter of this character must step to one side while that which is more pressing is printed. The amount of work per- formed at the Public Printing Office for the Executive Departments grows with every succeeding day, and naturally so, because the work _ of the departments grows with the increase of the country. I have simply to say of the present management of the Government Printing Office that I think it has made some very great improve- ments, and that matter is issued more promptly than has been the case heretofore. This is not only because of the pressure upon the Public Printer by Congress and by members of Congress, but because of the efficiency of that officer, as I think all must recognize. I realize that there is great trouble in this direction, but I do not see how it can be remedied unless we make a very large increase in the force of the Government Printing Office and give it greater facili- ties than it now possesses. The loss to the Government in the output of the establishment, caused by the eight-hour system (against which I have no objection, and I merely mention it as producing a result in the slowness of work) and the thirty days’ leave granted to all employ- ees, which is equal to about 10 per cent of their labor as well as their pay, of course produce delay in the printing of important matter. The effort of the Joint Committee on Printing has been to procure dispatch in printing these publications, and I hope there may be even 1628 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. a bettering of the condition as we run along during the remainder of the present fiscal year. The concurrent resolution was agreed to. February 9, 1893—House. The SPEAKER (Mr. Cuarues F. Crisp) laid before the House Senate concurrent resolution to provide for printing the annual reports of the Smithsonian Institution and of the National Museum for the year ending June 30, 1892. Mr. James D. RicHarpson. Mr. Speaker, the Committee on Print- ing have considered that resolution and reported it favorably. Imove that it be concurred in. The SPEAKER. The gentleman from Tennessee, the chairman of the Committee on Printing, asks unanimous consent that this Senate reso- lution be concurred in. Mr. Ricuarpson. It does not require unanimous consent, Mr. Speaker. The SpEaAKER. Why not? It is a Senate resolution. Mr. Ricwarpson. It does not require an appropriation. The SpeakER. But it is not a House resolution, and under the rule it can be considered at this time only by unanimous consent. Mr. RicHarpson. The House has already provided for printing the identical number provided for in this Senate resolution, and the adoption of this resolution simply prevents a waste of time. Mr. Netson Dincrey, jr. What does it provide for the printing of? Mr. Ricuarpson. The regular annual report of the Smithsonian Institution. As I have said, we have already in the printing bill passed a provision to print this number. The Speaker. The gentleman from Tennessee [Mr. Richardson] asks unanimous consent for the present consideration.of this Senate resolution. Is there objection? Mr. Omer M. Kem. I object. The Speaker. The resolution will be referred to the Committee on Printing. February 14, 1893—House. Mr. James D. RicHarpson, from Committee on Printing, sub- mitted report (H. 2496), on Senate concurrent resolution, with the recommendation that it be agreed to by the House. The estimated cost thereof was $18,000. Passed. PUBLIC PRINTING AND BINDING. August 5, 1892. Sundry civil act for 1893. And the heads of the Executive Departments, before transmitting their annual reports to Congress, the printing of which is chargeable to this appropriation, shall cause the same to be carefully examined, and shall exclude therefrom all matter, including engravings, maps, FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. 1629 and drawings, and illustrations, except such as they shall certify in their letters transmitting such reports to be necessary and to relate entirely to the transaction of public business. (Stat., XXX VII, 387.) UNIVERSITY OF THE UNITED STATES. February 4, 1893—Senate. . Mr. REDFIELD Proctor introduced bill (S. 3824): That an institution shall be, and is hereby, established in the District of Columbia, to be called ‘‘The University of the United States,’’ where instruction shall be given in the higher branches of all departments of knowledge, practical as well as literary and scientific, and where facilities shall be furnished for research and investigation. Sec. 2. That the government of the university shall be vested in a board of regents and a council of faculties. Sec. 3. That the board of regents shall consist of one member from each State of the United States, to be appointed by the governor thereof, with the concurrence of the chief justice and the chief educational officer of his State, six members to be appointed by the President of the United States, with the advice and consent of the Senate, the following members ex officio, to wit, the President of the United States, who shall be honorary president of the board; the Vice-President of the United States, the Chief Justice of the United States, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Commissioner of Education, the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, and the president of the university; fifteen to be a quorum. The regents and their suc- cessors are hereby created a body politic and corporate, with the name of ‘‘ The Regents of the University of the United States,’’ and with power, subject to limita- tions herein prescribed, to adopt statutes for the government of the university, to elect the officers thereof, to determine the conditions of admission to the university, to confer such degrees, and such only, as are recommended by the council of faculties, and in general to perform any and all acts not inconsistent herewith or with the Con- stitution and laws of the United States, which may be necessary to the ends herein proposed. Sec. 4. That the first meeting of the board of regents shall be called by the Presi- dent of the United States, and shall be held in the city of Washington within three months after the passage of this act. At such meeting all members representing the several States shall be divided, as nearly as possible, into six equal classes, such division being according to an alphabetical arrangement of the States by them repre- sented. The classes thus formed shall be numbered in the order of such arrangement, and shall retire in such order at the end of one, two, three, four, five, and six years, respectively; and their successors shall be appointed thereafter for the term of six years. If the governor of any State shall neglect to make such appoint- ment within three months after the notice of a vacancy for such State, the board may fill the same by the election of some suitable citizen thereof. The regents first appointed by the President shall retire in the order of their names on the list of appointments at the end of one, two, three, four, five, and six years, and their suc- cessors thereafter shall be appointed for the term of six years. In order to the fullest efficiency, the board of regents shall designate seven of its members, including the president of the university as chairman ex officio, to act as an executive committee, with authority to choose the members of faculties and all employees of the university and fix their compensation, as well as to transact ordinary current business, and to perform such other duties as are imposed. The six members appointed shall be chosen for one, two, three, four, five, and six years, respectively, and their successors shall be appointed for the term of six years. 1630 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Meetings of the board shall be held annually for the transaction of general busi- ness and the conferring of degrees. Special meetings may also be held upon call of the executive committee as the exigencies of the university shall require. Sec. 5. That the chief officer of the university shall be a president chosen by the board of regents and hold office during their pleasure. He shall be president of the board of regents and of the council of faculties, shall have general supervision of the university, and discharge such other duties as are prescribed by the board or by the council of faculties. The treasurer of the university shall also be appointed by the regents, and give bonds approved by them. He shall perform the duties usually required of such officers, and such other duties as are imposed by the board — of regents. 4 Sec. 6. That the council of faculties, embracing the president of the university and all heads of faculties, shall be charged with the planning and direction of instruction and discipline in the ‘several departments, and with the other duties prescribed in the statutes or designated by the regents. Sec. 7. That the immediate government of each faculty shall be entrusted to its own members. Its chairman, to be known as dean of the faculty, shall be chosen by the executive committee on the recommendation of the president of the univer- sity, and shall be responsible for the supervision of its internal affairs. Sec. 8. That no chair for instruction sectarian in religion or partisan in politics shall be maintained upon funds derived from the general university endowment, or permitted in any form, and no sectarian or partisan test shall be allowed in the appointment of professors to the chairs so endowed and maintained, or in the selec- tion of any officer of the university; but chairs or faculties for instruction in any department of learning may be endowed by gift, devise, or bequest, and the parties endowing the same, or their legally authorized trustees, shall have the privilege, subject to the approval of the board of regents, of designating the titles thereof and the instruction to which such endowments shall be devoted. No amount less than $100,000, however, shall be considered a full endowment for any chair in the university. Existing institutions, which are free from controlling obligations of a sectarian or partisan nature, and have endowments sufficient to support a faculty, may, with the approval of the regents, and on terms prescribed by them, become faculties or departments of the university, still retaining or adopting such titles as they may prefer. Src. 9. That the facilities afforded by the university shall be open to all who are competent to use them, on conditions prescribed by the executive committee, with . the advice of the faculties and officers directly concerned; but degrees shall be con- ferred upon such persons only as have previously received the degree of bachelor of arts, or some equivalent degree, from some institution recognized for this purpose by the university authorities. Sec. 10. That in order to extend the privileges of the university and to improve the collegiate and other grades of public instruction in the country, it is provided that each State and Territory of the United States, in the ratio of population, shall be entitled to free scholarships of such number, not less than one for each Represent- ative and Delegate in Congress and two for each Senator, as the board of regents shall determine. The executive committee of the board of regents may, for suf- ficient reasons, withhold the award of any scholarship, or cancel its privileges, or those of any student in the university. Sec. 11. That for the advancement of science and learning by means of researches and investigations, there shall be established fellowships in the university of such character and number as the interests to be represented and the resources at com- mand shall warrant, which fellowships shall yield a partial or a full support, as the regents shall determine. They may be provided for out of the university income, or may be endowed by gift or otherwise, and the persons, organizations, corporate bodies, or States endowing them may, subject to the approval of the board of FIFTY-SECOND CONGRESS, 1891-1893. 1631 regents, designate their titles and the researches or investigations they shall be used to encourage. Src. 12. That in the admission and appointment of persons to places in the univer- sity, character and competency shall be the sole test of qualifications. Sec. 13. That as a means of partially providing building sites for the several depart- ments of the university, the following tract of land selected and appropriated by President Washington for the site of the national university proposed by him and in part actually endowed by provisions of his last will and testament, to wit, that tract in the city of Washington long known as ‘‘ University Square,’’ and now occupied by the National Observatory, is hereby granted and set apart for the use and benefit of the university of the United States when no longer required for observatory purposes, Sec. 14. That for the practical establishment, support, and maintenance of the university there is hereby appropriated and set apart one-half the net proceeds of the sales of the public lands, as the same shall accrue from year to year. Of this amount, one-half shall be held by the Treasurer of the United States for use in secur- ing and improving grounds for the seat of the university, for providing the necessary buildings and equipments, and for conducting the institution after its opening; but the remaining one-half shall be allowed to accumulate in the Treasury as a perma- nent fund, yielding interest at the rate of 5 per centum per annum as a further revenue, until such fund, together with the endowments from other sources, shall be sufficient for the support of the university, after which all the net proceeds of the sales of public lands so used for university purposes shall be passed to the general fund or otherwise used, as Congress shall determine. All moneys held by the Treasurer of the United States under the provisions of this act shall be subject to requisitions drawn, as may be necessary, by the president and secretary of the board of regents under its order, but with this limitation, namely, that after the first five years subsequent to the organization of the board not more than 10 per centum of the aforementioned proceeds available for the erection of buildings and providing equipments shall be so used in any one year. Sec. 15. That the board of regents shall have power to receive and administer all such gifts, devises, and bequests as are made for the benefit of the university; which gifts, devises, and bequests, if in money, shall be deposited with the Treasurer of the United States, who shall pay interest thereon quarterly at the rate of 5 per centum per annum. Sec. 16. That after the formal opening of the university for instruction the mem- bers thereof, under rules approved by the officers, subject to any regulations pre- scribed by Congress, shall have access to all institutions, collections, and opportunities for study and research under control of the Government, so far as the same can be accorded without detriment to the public service; and to the end that all such facili- ties may be utilized to the fullest extent and that the Government service may in turn derive the largest benefit from the work done in the university, the heads of all bureaus, institutions, and other organizations of the Government, whose work is of a sort to justify it, shall be by the executive committee of the board brought into such advisory and co-operative relations with the heads of corresponding departments of the university as such committee, with the advice of the heads of faculties, and the aforesaid officers of the Government shall agree upon as being advantageous. Sec. 17. That at the close of the fiscal year the board of regents shall make a report to Congress, showing the operations, condition, and wants of the university; one copy of which shall be transmitted free to all institutions of learning endowed by the Government under any act of Congress, and to all other institutions of learn- ing in the United States whose degrees are recognized by this university. Referred to Select Committee to Establish the University of the United States. 1632 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. NATIONAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY. February 10, 1893—House. Mr. J. W. Covert introduced bill i 10472) to incorporate the National Historical Society. Referred to Committee on Library. February 10, 1893—Senate. Mr. G. F. Hoar presented memorial of citizens of Massachusetts praying the passage of a law for the incorporation of the National Historical Society. Referred to Committee on the Library. PUBLIC BUILDINGS. May 3, 1893. . Legislative, executive, and judicial act for 1894. Src. 3. That hereafter no building owned, or used for public pur- poses, by the Government of the United States, shall be draped in mourning and no part of the public fund shall be used for such purpose. Sec. 4. That hereafter the Executive Departments of the Govern- ment shall not be closed as a mark to the memory of any deceased ex-oflicial of the United States. - (Stat., XX VII, 715.) FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS, 1893-1895. APPOINTMENT OF REGENTS By the Vice-President. March 20, 1893—Senate. The Vicr-PresrpENT (Mr. A. E. Stevenson). Pursuant to section 5581 of the Revised Statutes, the Vice-President appoints the Senator from Delaware, George Gray, to bea Regent of the Smithsonian Insti- tution, to fill the vacancy occasioned by the expiration of his term of office. APPOINTMENT OF REGENTS By the Speaker. August 11, 1893—House. The SprakerR (Mr. Cuarzes F. Crisp). To fill the-vacancy in the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution occasioned by the resignation of H. C. Lodge, of Massachusetts, the Chair announces the appointment of R. R. Hitt, of Illinois. January 4, 1894—House. The SPEAKER (Mr. CuHarues F. Crisp). To fill the vacancies in the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution occasioned by the FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS, 1892-1895. 1633 expiration of the terms of Joseph Wheeler, of Alabama W. C. P. Breckinridge, of Kentucky, and R. R. Hitt, the Speake1 appoints _ Joseph Wheeler, of Alabama, W. C. P. Breckinridge, of Kentucky, and R. R. Hitt. APPOINTMENT OF REGENTS By Joint Resolution. February 15, 1894—Senate. Mr. J. S. Morrixt introduced joint resolution (S. 62): That the vacancy in the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, of the class other than members of Congress, shall, be filled by the reappointment of Andrew D. White, of New York, whose term of office expires on February 15, 1894. February 16, 1894—Senate. Mr. J. S. Morritu. I desire to have the joint resolution on the table providing for the reappointment of Andrew D. White as one of the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution acted upon this morning, in order that it may be sent to the other House. The Vicr-PresipEent (Mr. A. E. Stevenson). The Senator from Ver- mont asks for the present consideration of the joint resolution [S. 62] to fill vacancies of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. The joint resolution will be read for information. The Secretary read the joint resolution: Resolved, etc., That the vacancy in the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Insti- tution, of the class other than members of Congress, shall be filled by the reappoint- ment of Andrew D. White, of New York, whose term of office expires on February 15, 1894. The Vicr-PrREsIDENT. Is there objection to the present consideration of the joint resolution? There being no objection, the joint resolution was considered as in Committee of Whole. The joint resolution was passed. On motion of Mr. S. M. Cuttom the title was amended so as to read: ‘fA joint resolution to fill a vacancy in the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.” March 6, 1894—House. The SpraKker (Mr. Cuarues F. Crisp) laid before the House joint resolution (S. 62). Referred to Committee on the Library. March 14, 1894—House. Mr. Barnes Compton, from Committee on the District of Columbia, submitted favorable report (H. 584) on S. 62. Passed. March 19, 1894. Lesolwed, etc., That the vacancy in the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, of the class other than members of Congress, Hi. Doe. (32 103 1634 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. shall be filled by the reappointment of Andrew D. White, of New York, whose term of office expires on February 15, 1894. (Stat., XXVIII, 579.) December 3, 1894—House. Mr. Wiiu1aM M. Sprincer introduced joint resolution (H. 230): That Martin F. Morris, of the District of Columbia, is hereby elected a Regent of the Smithsonian Institution to fill a vacancy occasioned by the death of James C. Welling. Referred to Committee on the Library. December 5, 1894—House. Mr. JoserpH WHEELER, of Alabama, introduced joint resolution (H. 232): That the vacancy in the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, other than members of Congress, caused by the death of James C. Welling, of the ‘city of Washington, be filled by the appointment of Gardiner G. Hubbard, a citizen of the District of Columbia. Referred to Committee on the Library. December 10, 1894—Senate. Mr. J. S. Morrtiu introduced a resolution (S. 109) same as H. 232. Passed. January 30, 1895—House. Mr. Franxuin Bartietr, from Committee on the Library, sub- mitted report (H. 1718) on S. 109: The Committee on the Library, to whom was referred the Senate joint resolution (S. 109) to fill vacancies in the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, have had the resolution under considera- tion, and report back the same with the recommendation that it do pass. The purpose of the resolution is to fill the vacancy in the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution created by the death of James C. Welling, of the city of Washington. Referred to House Calendar. February 25, 1895—House. S. 109 passed. February 27, 1895. Resolved, etc., That the vacancy in the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution other than members of Congress, caused by the death of James C. Welling, of the city of Washington, be filled by the appointment of Gardiner G. Hubbard, a citizen of Washington, of the District of Columbia. (Stat., XXVIII, 972.) ee ee a a —— oe eee ee ‘ FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS, 1893-1895. 1635 FREE EXCHANGE OF DOCUMENTS. August 14, 1893—Senate. Mr. J. H. Gauurncer introduced bill (8. 300,) to provide for the free exchange through the mails between the several States of the United States of America and between said States and foreign nations of public printed reports and documents of the several States of the United States. Referred to Committee on Post-Offices and Post-Roads. EXPOSITIONS. San Francisco Haposition. September 1, 1893. Whereas there will be held in the city and county of San Francisco, State of California, from and after January 1, 1894, an exposition to be known as the California Midwinter International Exposition, in which foreign nations and foreign exhibitors have been invited and have agreed to participate: Therefore, Be it enacted, etc., That all articles which shall be imported from foreign countries for the sole purpose of exhibition at said exposition, upon which there shall be a tariff or customs duty, shall be admitted free of payment, of duty, customs fees, or charges, under such regu- lations as the Secretary of the Treasury shall prescribe, and all articles which have been imported from foreign countries and which are now on exhibition at the World’s Columbian Exposition at Chicago, upon which there is a tariff or customs duty, and which have been hereto- fore admitted free of payment of duty, customs fees, or charges, may, under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury, be removed to the city of San Francisco, in the State of California, for the sole purpose of exhibition at said California Midwinter Interna- tional Exposition. Src. 2. That it shall be lawful at any time during such exposition to sell for delivery at the close of the exposition any of the goods or property imported for and actually on exhibition in the exposition buildings or on its grounds, subject to such regulations for the security of the revenue and for the colléction of the import duties as the Secretary of the Treasury shall prescribe: Provided, That all such articles when sold or withdrawn for consumption in the United States shall be subject to the duty, if any, imposed upon such articles by the revenue laws in force at the date of the importation; and all pen- alties prescribed by law shall be applied and enforced against such articles and against the persons who may be guilty of any illegal sale or withdrawal thereof. Src. 3. That all of the provisions of public resolution numbered thirty, entitled ‘‘ Joint resolution authorizing foreign exhibitors at 1636 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. the World’s Columbian Exposition to bring to this country foreign laborers from their respective countries for the purpose of preparing for and making their exhibits,” approved August 5, 1892, are hereby extended to and made applicable to said California Midwinter Inter- national Exposition to the same extent as if said California Midwinter International Exposition was therein specifically named. (Stat., XXVIII, 1.) Chicago Exposition. October 28, 1893. Resolwed, etc., That it is the sense of Congress that the acknowledg- ments of the Government and people of the United States be tendered to the various foreign governments of the world who have so gener- ously and effectively cooperated in the Quadri-centennial Exposition held in Chicago in commemoration of the discovery of America by Christopher Columbus. : That the President of the United States be requested to communicate to each foreign government that has participated in said exposition the acknowledgment of Congress for its contribution. (Stat., XXVIII, 13.) November 3, 1893. Joint resolution (No. 14) permitted foreign exhibits at the World’s Columbian Exposition acquired by contribution or purchase by the Columbian Museum of Chicago for its own use to be wholly released from all customs duties. (Stat., XXVIII, 13.) November 3, 1893. Resolved, etc., That on the termination of the World’s Columbian Exposition at Chicago, Il., in November, 1893, the exhibit of the Navy Department of the United States Government, better known as the model battle ship Z//inois, a facsimile of the battle ships /ndiana, Massachusetts, and Oregon, with such of her boats, equipments, and appurtenances now on exhibition as the Secretary of the Navy shall deem proper, be transferred to the State of Illinois as a naval armory for the use of the naval militia of the State of Illinois: Provided, That such articles as may or have been loaned by the various bureaus of the Navy Department, the United States Marine Corps, the Naval Academy and Hydrographic Office be not included in the said transfer except as hereinbefore provided. (Stat., XXVIII, 14.) December 15, 1893. Resolved, etc., That a diploma of honorable mention may be con- ferred upon designers, inventors, and expert artisans who have assisted in the production and perfection of such exhibits as are awarded diplo- mas in the World’s Columbian Exposition or are formally commended ae rae ee pe Free NC eee Oe eee . - er SP * 2 a Sve ae FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS, 1893-1895. 1637 by the director-general thereof; and authority is hereby given to the board of lady managers of the World’s Columbian Commission to pre- sent said diplomas of honorable mention to said designers, inventors, and expert artisans whenever a certificate is filed with said board of lady managers by an exhibitor who has received a medal and diploma or the formal commendation of the director-general, setting forth the name or names of designers,.inventors, and expert artisans who have assisted in the production and perfection of the exhibits for which said medals and diplomas were awarded or commendation made, the aggre- gate expense thereof not to exceed $5,000, to be paid from the sum of $100,000 appropriated by an act approved March 3, 1893, making appropriations for the sundry civil expenses of the Government for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1894, and for other purposes, for the payment of judges, examiners, and members of the committees to be appointed by the board of lady managers as authorized by section 6 of an act approved April 25, 1890, authorizing the World’s Columbian Exposition and appropriating money therefor. (Stat., XCX VIII, 575.) August 18, 1894. Sundry civil act for 1895. , The Secretary of State is hereby authorized and directed to inves- tigate and report to Congress at its next session what amount of losses was sustained by the Republic of France and by French exhib- itors at the World’s Columbian Exposition at Chicago by fire on the night of January 8 and 9, 1894, in the building of manufactures and liberal arts of said exposition. He shall cause proofs to be taken, satisfactory to himself, to determine the amount of such losses sus- tained by the French Government and by the several French exhibitors, and also by whose fault or negligence, if any, the losses occurred. The President of the United States is hereby authorized, in such form and manner as he shall deem most suitable, to signify to the governments of the several countries duly represented at the World’s Columbian Exposition, and to their leading official representatives thereat, the grateful appreciation of the Government and people of the United States of America for their valued contributions to the success of said exposition, and for their friendly participation in the commemoration of one of the most important events in human history; and the sum of $2,500, or so much thereof as may be necessary, is hereby appropriated for this purpose, to be paid upon the order of the President. To enable the committee on final report to arrange the reports of the various departments and prepare a synopsis of the same, $3,500, or so much as may be necessary, to be expended in the discretion of the committee; and said reports, with synopsis, including index for 1638 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. each volume, shall not exceed 10 quarto volumes in all, of not exceeding 1,000 pages each. (Stat., XXVIII, 387.) For taking down the Government main building erected for the Government exhibit at the World’s Columbian Exposition and its transportation, or so much of the material thereof as may be avail- able, and its reerection upon the site selected for the Cotton, States and International Exposition, including the purchase of such new material as may be found necessary, $50,000, or so much thereof as may be necessary, to be disbursed by the Secretary of the Treasury: Provided, That if it be found impracticable to take down, transport, and re-erect said building for the sum herein appropriated, then the Secretary of the Treasury shall cause a new building to be erected upon said site of the Cotton States and International Exposition for the Government exhibit, at a cost not to exceed $50,000. (Stat., XX VIIT, 421.) March 2, 1895. Naval act for 1896. That the Secretary of the Navy be, and he hereby is, authorized to transfer to the trustees of the Columbian Museum of Chicago the reproductions of the caravels of Columbus, the Santa Maria, Nina, and Pinta, which were exhibited at the World’s Columbian Exposition. (Stat., XXVIII, 842.) March 2, 1895. The deficiency act for 1895 authorized the Secretary of State to transfer to the Columbian Museum at Chicago all of the exhibit of the Department of State exhibited in the building known as the Convent of La Rabida and the east gallery of the United States Gov- | ernment building, except such articles as had been transferred to the National Museum or other Government establishments at Washington, (Stat., XXVIII, 843.) March 2, 1895. Sundry civil act for 1896. World’s Columbian Commission: That the Secretary of the Treasury be, and he is hereby, authorized to procure suitable cases for the bronze medals awarded exhibitors at the World’s Columbian Exposi- tion, and to pay for the same and also the expense of distributing said medals from the appropriation contained in the third section of an act entitled ‘‘An act to aid in carrying out the act of Congress approved April 25th, 1890, entitled ‘An act to provide for celebrating the four hundredth anniversary of the discovery of America by Christopher Columbus, by holding an international exposition of aits, industries, manufactures, and products of the soil, mine, and sea, in the city of FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS. 1893-1895. 16389 Chicago, in the State of Illinois,’ and appropriating money therefor,” approved August 5th, 1892. That the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, under the supervision of the Secretary of the Treasury, be authorized to print upon the blank diplomas authorized by section 3 of the said act of August 5, 1892, as amended by the act of March 3, 1893, making appropriations for the sundry civil expenses of the Government for the fiscal year 1894, the names of the persons to whom the diplomas are to be awarded by the World’s Columbian Commission, and the language of the awards as furnished by the committee on awards of the World’s Columbian Commission; and the expense thereof shall be paid from the appropriation of $103,000 contained in said sundry civil act to carry out section 3 as amended, which appropriation is hereby made available for such purpose until expended. And the Secretary of the Treasury is hereby authorized to furnish electrotypes or photographs of the medal of award of the World’s Columbian Exposition, to exhibitors to whom medal has been awarded, at the expense and cost of such exhibitors, and also to furnish the same to newspapers and periodicals for publication, provided the pub- lishers to whom the electrotypes or photographs are furnished pay the expenses thereof, but that no electrotypes or photographs shall be furnished to any persons except those to whom medal has been awarded and to newspapers and periodicals paying for the same, and any other person printing facsimiles of said electrotypes or photographs of said medals shall be liable to the penalty prescribed by act of August 5, 1892. (Stat., XXVIII, 928.) Antwerp Exposition. March 12, 1894. Joint resolution No. 12 accepted invitation of the Government of Belgium to the International Exposition to be held at Antwerp, May, 1894, and authorized the appointment of five commissioners to repre- sent the United States. The heads of Departments of the Govern- ment of the United States were authorized and instructed to co-operate with the commission, no liabilities to be created on the United States, and no appropriation made for a Government exhibit. (Stat., XXVIII, 578.) Tacoma Exposition. August 3, 1894. Act exempted articles of foreign exhibitors at the Interstate Fair at Tacoma, Wash., from payment of duties, ete. (Stat., XX VILL, 224.) 1640 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Atlanta Exposition. August 18, 1894. Sundry civil act for 1895. For an exhibit by the Government of the United States of such articles and materials as illustrate the function and administrative fac- ulty of the Government, to be made at the Cotton States and Interna- tional Exposition, to be held at Atlanta, Georgia, in the year 1895, and for the employment of proper persons as officers and assistants by the board of management hereinafter created, and for the mainte- nance of the building hereinafter provided for, and for other contin- gent expenses incidental to the Government exhibit, to be approved by the chairman of the board of management and by the Secretary of the Treasury upon itemized accounts and vouchers, $150,000, or so much thereof as may be necessary, to be disbursed by the board of management, of which not exceeding $10,000 shall be expended for clerical services. And to secure a complete and harmonious arrange- ment of said Government exhibit a board of management shall be created, to be charged with the selection, purchase, preparation, transportation, arrangement, safe-keeping, exhibition, and return of such articles and materials as the heads of the Executive Departments, the Smithsonian Institution and National Museum, and the United States Fish Commission may respectively decide shall be embraced in said Government exhibit. The President may also designate addi- tional articles for exhibition. Such board shall be composed of one member to be detailed by the head of each Executive Department, one by the head of the Smithsonian Institution and National Museum, and one by the head of the United States Fish Commission, and the President shall name one of said members as chairman. But the United States shall not, in any manner nor under any cir- cumstances, be liable for any of the acts, doings, proceedings, or repre- sentations of the said Cotton States and International Exposition, organized under the laws of the State of Georgia, its officers, agents, servants, or employees, or any of them, or for the service, salaries, labor, or wages of said officers, agents, servants, or employees, or any of them, or for any subscriptions to the capital stock, or for any cer- tificates of stock, bonds, mortgages, or obligations of any kind issued by said corporation, or for any debts, liabilities, or expenses incidental to the exposition: Provided, however, That all articles which shall be imported from foreign countries for the sole purpose of exhibition at said exposition, upon which there shall be a tariff or customs duty, shall be admitted free of duty, customs fees, or charges, under such regulations as the Secretary of the Treasury shall prescribe; but it shall be lawful at any time during the exposition to sell, for delivery at the close of the exposition, any goods or property imported for and FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS, 1893-1895. 1641 actually on exhibition, in the exposition buildings or on its grounds, subject to such regulation for the security of the revenue and for the collection of the import duties as the Secretary of the Treasury shall prescribe; and all such articles, when sold or withdrawn for consump- tion in the United States, shall be subject to the duty, if any, imposed upon such article by the revenue laws in force at the date of importa- tion, and all penalties prescribed by law shall be applied and enforced against such articles and against the persons who may be guilty of any illegal sale or withdrawal: And provided further, That medals, with appropriate devices, emblems, and inscriptions commemorative of said Cotton States and International Exposition, and of the awards to be made to exhibitors thereat, be prepared at some mint of the United States for the board of directors thereof, subject to the provisions of the fifty-second section of the coinage act of 1873, upon the payment of a sum not less than the cost thereof; and all the provisions, whether penal or otherwise, of said coinage act against the counterfeiting or imitating of coins of the United States shall apply to the medals struck and issued under this section. ; For taking down the Government main building erected for the - Government exhibit at the World’s Columbian Exposition and its trans- portation, or so much of the material thereof as may be available, and its reerection upon the site selected for the said Cotton States and Inter- national Exposition, including the purchase of such new materials as may be found necessary, $50,000, or so much thereof as may be neces- sary, to be disbursed by the Secretary of the Treasury: Provided, That if it be found impracticable to take down, transport, and re-erect said building for the sum herein appropriated, then the Secretary of the Treasury shall cause a new building to be erected upon said site of the Cotton States and International Exposition for the Government exhibit, at'a cost not to exceed $50,000, for which purpose the amount herein appropriated is hereby made available: Provided always, That the United States shall in no manner, and under no circumstances, be liable for any bond, debt, contract, expenditure, expense, or liability of any kind whatever of the said Cotton States and International Exposition, its officers, agents, servants, or employees, or incident to or growing out of said exposition, nor for any amount whatever in excess of the $150,000 and of the $50,000 herein authorized; and the heads of Executive Departments, the Smithsonian Institution and National Museum, and the United States Fish Commission, and the board of management herein authorized, their officers, agents, servants, or employees shall in no manner and under no circumstances expend, or create any liability of any kind for, any sum in excess of the appropriations herein made, or create any deficiency. (Stat., XX VIII, 420.) 1642 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. . January 21, 1895. Resolved, ctc., Whereas the Cotton States and International Expo- sition Company of Atlanta, Georgia, have extended invitations, which have been accepted by the several nations and space for installing foreign exhibits has been applied for and duly apportioned, and con- cessions and privileges granted by the exposition management to the citizens and subjects of foreign nations; and whereas for the purpose of securing the production upon the exposition grounds of scenes illustrative of the architecture, dress, habits, and modes of life, occu- pation, industries, means of locomotion and transportation, amuse- ments, entertainments, and so forth, of the natives of foreign countries, it has been necessary for the Cotton States and International Exposition Company to grant concessions and privileges to certain firms and corporations conceding the right to make such productions: Therefore, Resolved, etc., That the act of Congress approved February 26, 1885, prohibiting the importation of foreigners under contract to perform labor, and the acts of Congress prohibiting the coming of Chinese per- sons into the United States, and the acts amendatory of these acts, shall not be so construed, nor shall anything therein operate to pre- vent, hinder, or in any wise restrict any foreign exhibitor, represen- tative, or citizen of a foreign nation, or the holder, who is a citizen of a foreign nation, of any concession or privilege from the Cotton States and International Exposition Company of Atlanta, Georgia, from bringing into the United States, under contract, such mechanics, arti- sans, agents, or other employees, natives of their respective foreign countries, as they or any of them may deem necessary for the purpose of making preparations for installing or conducting their exhibits or of preparing for installing or conducting any business authorized or permitted under or by virtue of or pertaining to any concession or privi- lege which may have been granted by the Cotton States and Interna- tional Exposition Company of Atlanta, Georgia, in connection with such exposition: Provided, however, That no alien shall by virtue of this act enter the United States under contract to perform labor except by express permission, naming such alien, of the Secretary of the Treasury; and any such alien who may remain in the United States for more than one year after the close of said exposition shall there- after be subject to all the processes and penalties applicable to aliens coming in violation of the alien-contract-labor law aforesaid. (Stat., XXVIII, 967.) FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS, 1893-1895. 16438 r Paris Exposition. August 23, 1894. Deficiency act for 1894, ete. For International Exposition at Paris in 1889, $4.66. [To cover claim reported in Senate Executive Document 164, Fifty-third Con- gress, second session. | (Stat., XXVIII, 486.) Portland Exposition. January 8, 1895. Whereas there will be held in the city of Portland and county of Multnomah, State of Oregon, from and after December 1, 1894, an exposition to be known as the Portland Universal Exposition, in which foreign nations and foreign exhibitors have been invited and have agreed to participate: Therefore, Be tt enacted, etc., That all articles which shall be imported from foreign countries for the sole purpose of exhibition at said exposition upon which there shall be a tariff or customs duty shall be admitted free of payment of duty, customs fees, or charges, under such regula- tions as the Secretary of the Treasury shall prescribe; and all articles which have been imported from foreign countries and which have been on exhibition at the World’s Columbian Exposition at Chicago, or which have been on exhibition at the California Midwinter International Exposition, or at the Interstate Fair at Tacoma, Washington, upon which there is a tariff or customs duty, and which have been hereto- fore admitted free of the payment of duty, customs fees, or charges, may, under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury, be transferred to the city of Portland, in the State of Oregon, for the sole purpose of exhibition at said exposition. Src. 2. That it shall be lawful at any time during such exposition to sell for delivery at the close of the exposition any of the goods or property imported for and actually on exhibition in the exposition buildings or on its grounds, subject to such regulations for the security of the revenue and for the collection of import duties as the Secretary of the Treasury shall prescribe: Provided, That all such articles when sold or withdrawn for consumption in the United States shall be sub- ject to the duty, if any, imposed upon such articles by the revenue laws in force at the date of sale; and all penalties prescribed by law shall be enforced and applied against such articles and against the persons who may be guilty of any illegal sale or withdrawal thereof. Suc. 3. That all of the provisions of public resolution numbered 30, entitled ‘* Joint resolution authorizing foreign exhibitors at the World’s Columbian Exposition to bring to this country foreign laborers from their respective countries for the purpose of preparing for and making their exhibits,” approved August 5, 1892, are hereby extended to and 1644 CONGRESSIONAL. PROCEEDINGS. made applicable to said Portland Universal Exposition to the same extent as if said exposition was therein specifically named. (Stat., XXVIII, 600.) Barcelona Exposition. March 2, 1895. | Sundry civil act for 1896. That the Secretary of the Treasury be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to allow and pay to Emile M. Blum, late United States commissioner-general to the International Exposition at Barcelona, Spain, the sum of $3,380.96 in the adjustment of his accounts, being the amount of money by him disbursed in furthering American inter- ests at said exposition not heretofore allowed by the accounting officers of the Treasury. (Stat., XXVIII, 934.) ETHNOLOGY—REPORT. September 6, 1893—House. : Mr. J. D. RicHarpson introduced concurrent resolution to print the Thirteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology. Referred to Committee on Printing. October 14, 1893—House. Mr. J. D. Ricuarpson offered concurrent resolution to print 8,000 copies of the Fourteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology. Referred to Committee on Printing. October 18, 1893—House. The Clerk continued the reading of the bill (H. 2650) for printing public documents, ete.: Of the report of the Bureau of Ethnology, 8,000 copies; 1,000 for the Senate, 2,000 for the House, and 5,000 for distribution by the Bureau of Ethnology. Mr. James C. C. Buack. Mr. Chairman, it seems to me that we are proceeding with undue haste. The suggestion which was made to us by the chairman of the Committee on Appropriations [Mr. Sayers] was, it seems to me, very timely, and one which ought to attract the attention and command the consideration of this committee. We are taking action here now which will come back to us hereafter when we are called upon to make appropriations. I would like to ask the chairman of the Committee on Printing whether it is not a fact that we have now stored somewhere in this building, or perhaps in other ‘buildings, a large number of the documents mentioned in this bill, or such documents as we are now providing shall be printed? Mr. J. D. Ricuarpson. I think not. These reports that we are now providing for are annual reports. They are printed from year FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS, 1893-1895. 1645 to year, and there can not be stored away any of these reports which have not yet been printed. Mr. Buack. I am not referring especially to the reports for this year, but I say, have we not stored away copies of like reports? Mr. Ricuarpson. It may be that some such are stored away. Mr. Brack. Is it not true that we have been called upon to provide a storehouse for these documents? * Has not the Government been called on to rent various places for the storage of documents of this kind? Mr. Ricuarpson. Yes, sir; that is true. . Mr. Bruack. Now, I would like to ask the gentleman, what is the necessity for our printing these documents when it has been demon- strated by actual experience that nobody wants them; that nobody will take them? Mr. Ricuarpson. I think the gentleman assumes a little too much when he says that ‘‘nobody” wants them. Because of the fact that we find here occasionally a number of members, two or three or a half dozen, who do not want them, and thereby these works accumu- late, that does not represent the whole number by any means. We take the publications as a. rule, and are glad to get them and send them out. I would like to have more of them myself. We send all out that we can get. There will be no accumulation of these, I am satisfied. Mr. Chairman, these publications mentioned in the paragraph of the bill we are now considering are the annual publications of the Goy- - ernment, and I beg the attention of the committee to this fact: That we have reduced every one of them, I believe, without exception, largely. Take the one that has just been read—the report of the Bureau of Ethnology. There is a reduction by this bill in that publication of 7,500 copies. They cost about $2.25 a copy, as nearas I can get at it; at all events, a little over $2. So that in this one publication, by the amendment of the committee in reporting this bill, we have saved 15,000 a year to the Government, and therefore it seems to me it ought to be passed without objection. Mr. Buackx. Ought it to pass if we can save $10,000 more? Mr. Ricwarpson. I think we have reduced the number as low as pos- sible with safety to the Government. We called the superintendent of the Bureau before us, and he testified that this number of copies that we left in the bill is absolutely necessary for distribution. Mr. Brack. Let me ask the gentleman further, do you think that the provision for 3,000 copies of the report of the Bureau of Ethnol- ogy for the use of the House is absolutely essential ? Mr. Ricuarpson. I thinkso. I think itis avery good and important publication. It is a valuable work certainly; a very valuable one to many members from sections where there are scientific schools or estab- 1646 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. lishments of that kind. There is quite a demand for it in mane parts of the country. Mr. JoserH W. Bartry. I would like to ask the gentleman from Tennessee what is the purpose of the work? Mr. RicHarpson. This is the report on ethnology. Mr. Batmry. Yes; but what is = object of publishing it by the Government ? Mr. Ricuarpson. Has the gentleman ever examined it? Mr. Batter. Yes, sir; I have. Mr. Ricwarpson. Then the gentleman is just as competent to testify. as I am. Mr. Barry. The gentleman answers my question by asking another. I hope he will give the information I have asked for. Mr. Ricnarpson. I can not say, of course, what would suit the taste of my friend from Texas. If he would like to inquire and learn any- thing about ethnology, he will find the information in this work. Mr. Frank E. BettzHoover. Mr. Chairman, I rise to a question of order. What proposition is pending before the committee? The CHarrMan (Mr. A. M. Docxsry). There is no amendment pend- ing. The Chair has been indulging this debate by consent of the committee. Mr. Buack. Then I will offer an amendment if necessary. Mr. Ricnarpson. If the gentleman will permit me, I will move to . strike out the last word—a pro forma amendment. I was going to say, Mr. Chairman, that these are very scientific and valuable productions, and are valuable not only to ourselves and our Government, but to all scientific people everywhere. I do not under- take to say that they would suit my friend from Texas or his taste for literature, but they do suit the taste of many people. Mr. Barry. That is precisely the point that I wanted to develope. Then this is an effort to promote science, as I understand it. Now, the only power of Congress to promote science is derived from the Constitution, which expressly authorizes it ‘‘ to promote the progress of science and the useful arts.” How? Not by publishing and dis- tributing such works as these, but by securing to authors and invent- ors the exclusive use of their writings or inventions for a limited time. And, as I take it, when Congress has done that it has exhausted its power to promote the progress of science and the useful arts. Mr. BettzHoover. Mr. Chairman, I offer an amendment to this section or paragraph of the bill. , The Clerk read: Amend by increasing the number in line 46, page 35, to ‘‘14,000;’’ and in line 47 change ‘1,000” to ‘‘3,000,”’ and ‘‘2,000”’ to ‘‘6,000.’’ Mr. BeitzHoover. Mr. Chairman, if the gentleman in charge of this bill, the chairman of the committee, will give me his attention, I FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS, 1893-1895. 1647 desire to say that this is one of the most valuable publications made by the Government. The demand for it by the institutions of learn- ing and by gentlemen of culture throughout the country, is as great relatively as the demand for the Agricultural Report. I believe, therefore, that while I might agree with the gentleman from Texas [Mr. Bailey] as to the paternalism of the Government involved in this question, and that I might justify myself in voting against publishing anything whatever by the Government, yet, if we do publish these books, I favor the publication of the valuable ones which are most sought after and are believed to be most useful as a means of conveying information to the people. The Committee on Printing, instead of reducing the numbers of these books that outside parties are entitled to, have cut down the number that members of Congress have hitherto received from 6,000 to 2,000, and have increased the number for-the Bureau of Ethnology. I can see no reason why we, the representatives of the people, in appropriating the money for publications for our constituents, shall not have the right to control the distribution of those documents in a ratable proportion among our districts without the intervention of people who may distribute them entirely in a few sections and toa few institutions and persons. If this number is to be 5,000 for the Bureau of Ethnology, then the number ought to be increased, as my amendment proposes, for the Senate and the House. There is no reason why this Bureau of Ethnology should have the right, with the little knowledge they have of the people requiring them in our several districts, to distribute them as they please without consulting members of the Senate or House. Therefore, if the number is to remain, as the Committee on Printing have reported it, at 5,000 for the Bureau of Ethnology, the number ought to be increased at least to 6,000 for this House of 356 members. Iam in favor of economy as much as any gentleman can be, but I dislike this cheese-paring economy in small matters that we sometimes _ see in this’ House, and which excites the contempt and derision of the country. If we are going to print these books, let us print the val- uable ones, and print them in such quantities that it will be worth while to take the trouble to distribute them. The number now reported will give us but 6 volumes apiece, to be distributed among an average population of 30,000 voters, whereas we ought to have more than double that number to supply the public libraries alone. Mr. Jerry Srmeson. I wish to offer an amendment to the amend- ment. -The Cuarrman. The gentleman will send it up. Mr. Suvpson. After the word ‘‘ copies,” in line 47, add the word ‘‘two” and strike out the word ‘‘one.” And in the same line, after the word ‘‘Senate,” strike out the word ‘*‘two” and insert the word 1648 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. ‘*five;” and in line 48 strike out the word ‘‘five” and add the word “Sone,” so as to read: Of the report of the Bureau of Ethnology, 8,000 copies—2,000 for the Senate, 5,000 for the House, and 1,000 for distribution by the Bureau of Ethnology. I think that will cure the evil complained of. Mr. BetrzHoover. That proposition being voted on first, if it is adopted, I will withdraw my amendment. Mr. Smpson. I think that will cure the evil the gentleman complains of, of giving so large a proportion to the Bureau. I agree entirely with the gentleman from Pennsylvania [ Mr. Beltzhoover | that this is a very valuable book, which ought to go out to the people. There is a large demand for it in my country. Perhaps in the district of the gentleman from Missouri [ Mr. Hall] they will consider it, like him, stuff and rot, but in my country and in the gentleman’s State I am satisfied that there is a large demand for the book. Mr. Jonn A. PickierR. Does the gentleman know whether 1,000 copies will be sufficient for the Bureau to enable them to make the exchanges that they make with the various nations of the earth? Mr. Suvpson. I should think it would be plenty. Mr. Pickier. I would not want to cut them below what they ought to have for making these exchanges. Mr. Smeson. That will be a sufficient number. Mr. Joun S. Wreiiams. Mr. Chairman, I am of the opinion, gener- ally speaking, that the less members of Congress and Senators have to do with anything in this Government, outside of the duties of legisla- tion, the better for them and for the people. There is a great deal of selfishness in everything, and I understand that; and I have it to as large an extent as the average member of the ~ body of which I am a member. I understand perfectly the feeling upon the part of a member of Congress that he is the proper party to distribute documents; but it is a mistaken feeling, and I think the sooner we go back to the idea that these documents are published for the purpose of disseminating useful information among the people and - not for the purpose of being used by us in order to advance our own political fortunes the better for the United States, and, in the long run, the better for us. Mr. Jounn Davis. But who knows better the people of the various districts than the Representatives from those districts ? Mr. Wriu1ams. Ah, Mr. Chairman, no man knows the people of the Fifth district of Mississippi better than I do, and nobody knows better where a public document will aid in my reelection than I do. Mr. Witu1am H. Doorrrrir. Do you not want to be reelected ? Mr. Wittrams. Now, Mr. Chairman, the people can get these docu- ments just as well through the Departments; and the Departments, as we all know, will take above all things else a list from a mem- FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS, 1893-1895. 1649 ber of Congress and advice from him as to how to distribute these documents. Mr. BettzHoover. Will the gentleman allow me to ask him if he ever tried that experiment? Mr. Wiiuiams. I have, and I am trying it to-day in the Interior Department. Mr. BretrzHoover. Have you ever gone to one of those bureaus with twenty-five or fifty names and got a favorable reply ? Mr. Wituiams. I will say this, that I am a new member of Congress and do not pretend to know the one hundred and sixty-fifth part of what I ought to know, much less what is to be known about things lying around loose in Washington about the Departments; but I do know this, that one of the first communications I received from the Agricultural Department was to send a number of names of parties to whom I wanted articles distributed. One of the first communications I received from the Interior Department was a like communication, and I was glad to comply with both so far as that was concerned. Now, what I want to impress upon the committee is that we should control this distribution, which is carried on at a large expense. Mr. Stvpson. Will the gentlemen allow me to ask him a question? I want to ask the gentleman when he received that communication from the Agricultural Department did not they suggest to him that the gen- tleman’s name should be sent on the articles to be sent from that Department, so that the parties receiving them would understand that the gentleman had sent them ? Mr. Wriu1ams. I believe they did. Mr. Stvpson. Well, then, did not that have the same effect as if the gentlemen had sent them, and while the Departments are distributing them in this way at your request are you not in effect distributing the books? Mr. Wriu1ams. I am not talking about the effect, but I will come to it in this way. In my district Senators distribute documents; in my district I distribute them, and the Departments also distribute them. Here is a man known to be a live, talking Democrat. He gets four documents; and another man, who, perhaps, would get more good out of these documents, gets none. Now, my idea is that the object of these publications is to distribute them where they will do the most good. The next idea in my mind is this, that the very main object in the mind of the Democratic party at present is to put the Government back upon an economic footing. Now, you have just had the chairman of the Committee on Appropriations call- ing your attention to the fact that if we go on increasing these reports of committees that there will come up behind us the necessity finally to make appropriations to pay for these things. I shall oppose this proposition, and I desire to offer amendments to the section. H. Doc. 732——104 1650 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Mr. Srvpson. Will the gentleman allow me just a moment? I know he wants to be fair. Now, he thinks that these 5,000 copies should be left for distribution by the Department. You leave them in control of their distribution. I think it is dangerous legislation to leave them for their distribution, and it is a matter of patronage with the Department. . Mr. Wiiu1ams. I will offer an amendment that I think the gentle- man will agree to, that this distribution shall be given with the advice of the Senators and Representatives from the State. The Cuarrman. The time of the gentleman has expired. Mr. Ricuarpson. Mr. Chairman, I desire to oppose the amendment offered by the gentleman from Pennsylvania. é Mr. WiiutiaMs. I wanted to offer some amendments. - Mr. Rrcuarpson. I will yield to the gentleman so that he may offer his amendment. Mr. Wiiu1ams. Mr. Chairman, I am going to offer some amendments which are rather radical in their nature. In lines 12 and 13 The Cuarrman. The Chair will state to the gentleman that there is, an amendment now pending, and an amendment to the amendment. At this stage a substitute would be in order. Mr. Ricnwarpson. Mr. Chairman, I want to say that these amend- ments offered by these gentlemen ought not to prevail. If we are going to economize the only way to do it is to reduce the number of documents printed. We have reduced this from 15,500 to 8,000, a saving of about $15,000 or $16,000 in this one publication. Now, the distribution we make is 1,000 for the Senate and 2,000 for the House and 5,000 for the Department. Now, I say Mr. Smueson. Will the gentleman permit me? Mr. Ricuarpson. I can not do that. I must make this statement. That is the best distribution that could be made of this document. I assert that, Mr. Chairman. Gentlemen go upon the idea that if the Department gets these copies they are lost to the country, but if my friend, after distributing his share, wants to get a copy, or 2 copies, or 3 copies, all he has to do is to ask the chief of this Bureau to supply A, B, or C with a copy or copies of the document, and if the chief has got them he will send them to the gentleman’s constituent and accom- pany them with a letter stating that they are sent at the request of the Representative. The gentleman from Pennsylvania [Mr. Beltzhoover] complains that each member does not get enough of these documents under the biJl, but what does he propose? He says that the number proposed in the bill, 6, is not sufficient, that it must be increased, and thereupon he proposes to increase it to 11. Now, if 6 copies will not meet the demand, certainly 11 will not. Mr. BreurzHooverR. It will come nearer to it, though. Mr. Ricnarpson. And the gentleman from Kansas [Mr. Simpson] FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS, 1893-1995. 1651 comes along and proposes to increase the number so that each mem- ber shall have about 13. Mr. Stmpson. I do not increase the number to be printed at all. Mr. Ricnarpson. You do increase the allowance of members, though, giving them about 13 each, instead of 6, as the bill proposes. Now, each member represents about from 30,000 to 35,000 male voters, and there are about as many ladies, making 60,000 or 70,000 grown people in each district. It is obvious that you can not supply all those people with 13 or with 11 copies of these documents any more than you could with 6, and I insist that we ought not to undertake to supply any- thing like the demand that may be created in a Congressional district for a valuable publication like this. Let each member have 6 copies, and inasmuch as this is more or less a scientific publication, if he wants to supply the libraries in his dis- trict, he will have his 6 copies for that purpose, but we can not under- take to meet the whole demand unless we are prepared to bankrupt the Treasury. I think We have provided copies enough. I think we ought to begin to economize and to keep it up upon every Government publication. The Committee on Printing, recognizing that, have put the knife to every annual publication of the Government, except that of the Department of Agriculture. Gentlemen here have railed about discrimination against the report of the Secretary of Agriculture, but the fact is that we have treated that more liberally than any other publication; we make no reduction in the number of the Agricultural Reports published, while, as I say, we have applied the knife to every other publication; and I do insist that members on this side of the House especially ought not to increase these publications beyond the number contained in the bill. Gentlemen have demanded that we shall economize, and the only way to do it is to reduce the number of these documents published, and the committee propose to do that. Mr. BetrzHoover. Will the gentleman yield for a question ? The Cuartrman. The time of the gentleman from Tennessee has expired. Mr. BeirzHoover. Well, I will move to strike out the last word, and ask him a question which he may answer in my time. If these publications are made, as I understand they are, for the benefit of institutions of learning and public libraries, ought we not to publish enough of them to be able to send a copy to each public library in our districts? This allowance of 6 copies, which the gentleman proposes, is not half enough to supply the libraries in my district, and will com- pel me to make an unpleasant discrimination against a majority of these beneficent institutions. Mr. Ricwarpson. This bill provides that whenever there is an edi- tion of 5,000 copies printed, 10 per cent of them shall be sent to the superintendent of documents in the Interior Department, and he appor- 1659 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. tions them to the designated depositories throughout the country, so that the gentleman’s district will get its share. Mr. BeitzHoover. I beg the gentleman’s pardon. That number— 500—will not allow members and Senators more than 1 additional vol- ume, for there are 440 members and Senators in both bodies. Mr. RicHarpson. There are 6 copies for each member. Mr. BettzHoover. Well, there are 14 public libraries in my dis- trict, and even if I should get the odd volume which his generosity offers I would have only 7 copies. Mr. Ricwarpson. But they are not all designated depositories. Mr. BreuttzHoover. They are all designated depositories under the law, and can not get these books under this provision, and I hold that in printing a valuable book like this, while we do not undertake to dis- tribute it indiscriminately, we eupha to print enough copies to be able to supply all the public libraries with it. Mr. Ricuarpson. You can not do that without bankrupting the Government. ‘ Mr. BettzHoover. Oh, it isa mere pretense to assert that this would bankrupt the Government. The CHarrMANn. The question is on the amendment of the gentleman from Kansas. Mr. Smuupson. Before that vote is taken, Mr. Chairman, | wish to say that my amendment does not increase the number of these docu- ments to be printed. It merely takes 4,000 copies from the Bureau and distributes them amongst the members of the House and the Senate. Therefore it does not increase the expense of the publication at all. The Cuarrman. The question is on the amendment to the amendment offered by the gentleman from Kansas [Mr. Simpson], which will be reported by the Clerk. The amendment was read: Page 33, line 47, strike out ‘‘one’’ after the word ‘‘copies’’ and insert ‘‘two;”’ same line strike out ‘‘two”’ after the word ‘‘Senate’’ and insert ‘“‘ five;’’ line 48, after the word ‘‘and,’’ strike out ‘‘five’’ and insert ‘‘one,’’ so that the provision will read: ‘‘Of the report of the Bureau of Ethnology, 8,000 copies; 2,000 for the Senates5,000 for the House, and 1,000 for distribution by the Bureau of Ethnology.” The amendment to the amendment was agreed to. The CHarrMAN. The question now is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Pennsylvania | Mr. Beltzhoover] as amended by the amendment of the gentleman from Kansas | Mr. Simpson]. The amendment as amended was adopted. January 8, 1894—House. Mr. J. D. Rrcuarpson introduced concurrent resolution to print 8,000 copies of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Annual Reports of the Bureau of Ethnology. Referred to Committee on Printing. FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS, 1893-1895. 1653 January 12, 1894—Senate. Mr. A. P. GormAN submitted report in favor of printing the Thir- teenth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology. Senate concurrent resolution passed to print the Thirteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology, 1,000 for the Senate, 2,000 for the House, and 5,000 copies for the use of the Bureau. January 15, 1894—House. The Speaker (Mr. Cuaruss F. Crisp) laid before the House a Senate concurrent resolution providing for the printing of 8,000 copies of the Thirteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology, which was read. Mr. JoserH D. Sayers. Mr. Speaker, I wish to ask the gentleman a question in regard to that resolution. My recollection is that the printing of the Geological Survey, under which the Bureau of Eth- nology operates, at least in part, is provided for in the sundry civil bill. Now, I want to ask the gentleman whether this resolution pro- poses to make an additional appropriation for that printing? Mr. James D. Ricuarpson. No, sir. The appropriation of which the gentleman speaks as being carried in the sundry civil bill is for the current printing of the Bureau of Ethnology. There is no pro- vision there for printing the extra copies which are provided for in this resolution, and which are intended for Congress and for distri- bution by the Bureau. This resolution is to provide for printing the same number of extra copies that is provided for in the printing bill which passed this House in the extraordinary session and is now pend- ing in the Senate; but, lest that bill should not pass the Senate in time, the Bureau and its officers have thought it wise to ask us to provide for these extra copies by a special concurrent resolution in order that they may go on with the work and not be delayed while waiting for the passage of the printing bill. That is the reason this resolution is proposed. Mr. Sayers. I ask the gentleman to let the resolution lie over until I can confer with him about it. Mr. Ricuarpson. I have no objection to that, Mr. Speaker. Let it lie on the Speaker’s table. January 18, 1894—House. Concurrent resolution to print the Thirteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology passed. June 11, 1894—House. Mr. James D. Ricnarpson, from Committee on Printing, submitted report (H. 1060) on concurrent resolution: The Committee on Printing have considered House concurrent reso- lution to print 8,000 copies of the thirteenth and fourteenth annual reports of Director of the Bureau of Ethnology with illustrations, ete., and report same with recommendation that it do pass with an amend- 1654 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. ment striking out so much thereof as provides for the printing of thirteenth annual report, as same has heretofore been ordered printed, The estimated cost of fourteenth report is $12,000. Resolution passed. June 12, 1894—Senate. Referred to Committee on Printing. UNIVERSITY OF THE UNITED STATES. September 6, 1893—House. Mr. James W. Covert introduced bill (H. 389): That there shall be, and is hereby, established in the District of Columbia a uni- versity of the United States, which is hereby incorporated by such name, with seal, and subject to the acts of Congress at any time hereafter to be made. Src. 2. The trustees of such corporation, in whom shall vest in trust all property, real and personal, and all power to receive, collect, convert, invest, and apply said property, shall be the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institute, who may appoint a committee of ten of such regents to serve for five years, and preside over and direct the proceedings of said university. Sec. 3. That said committee of ten of said regents shall be the governors and trustees of said university during their term of appointment, and shall have exclusive charge and control thereof. They may select and nominate to the Board of Regents for appointment as professors and assistant professors, direct the studies, provide the apparatus and library, preside over examinations and admission of students, and prescribe rules and discipline, and enforce the same, and shall report all their acts and proceedings herein at the first meeting of the Board of Regents thereafter, and if the same be confirmed by said board, such acts and proceedings of said commit- tee of governors shall be valid, or may be amended or repealed by said board, but until said order of said board all said acts and proceedings of said governors shall be valid; that each acting member of said committee of governors shall be paid the same compensation as Members of the House of Representatives, monthly, except mileage allowance, for his services during said term of office. Src. 4. That there shall be granted’ to the said university, as a perpetual endow- ment, so many sections of public land, with no subdivision less than quarter sections, and excepting mineral lands, at $1.25 per acre, as shall amount to at least $5,000,000; said lands to be selected by said regents, subject’ to the control of the Secretary of the Interior, who is hereby directed to issue to the said university all patents or script as may be required to vest valid title in said land. Said lands shall be gradu- ally sold by said university at the highest market value, and said university is hereby authorized to receive further perpetual endowments from any sources, by gifts, bequest of property. Sec. 5. All moneys derived from the sale of said lands or from any other sources at any time, shall by said regents be invested without delay in the stocks of the United States, or other safe public securities yielding at least 5 per cent per annum interest on their par value, with power to said regents, with approval of the Secre- tary of the Treasury, at any time when necessary, to change said securities. All said investments shall be made under the direction of the Secretary of the Treasury, and all said securities shall be deposited by said regents and kept on special deposit, separate from the public funds in the Treasury of the United States, and said regents shall every three months make to the Secretary of the Treasury a sworn statement by their secretary or committee duly appointed therefor of the amount of capital to date, its investment in detail, and its net income and accumulations thereof to date FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS, 1893-1895. 1655 of report. Said secretary or committee of said regents appointed to make and report such investments and collect said income shall receive a yearly salary of $ payable monthly by said regents. Sxc. 6. That said capital shall never in any way be used by said university, but only to secure a definite income; that all outlay for lands, buildings, furniture, cabi- nets, libraries, apparatus, and salaries, etc., shall be paid from the said income exclusively, and said regents are hereby prohibited from incurring any debt or liabil- ity beyond the actual income aforesaid. Sec. 7. That the object and aim of said university is to furnish gratuitously to all qualified students a thorough practical knowledge, to the most advanced degree, of every science useful to an accomplished engineer, civil, military, or naval, besides the study of the history, constitution, and laws of the United States and of the sey- eral States, as well as those of Europe, with their languages and literature, the theory of practical agriculture, irrigation, and forestry. Sec. 8. That students, to enter, must not be over the age of 18 years, of good moral character, residents or natives of the United States, who must pledge them- selves to serve the United States when needed, after graduation. They must suc- cessfully pass a rigid examination in the highest branches of science or learning taught in any State college or university, and they must bind themselves to punctual attendance on all instruction and examinations of said university, unless necessarily prevented, for and during the course of five years before graduation. Graduates must pass a rigid examination on each subject pursued, and shall receive, besides academical degrees, appointments as assistant United States engineers. Sec. 9. That the salaries of all professors of said university shall be not less than $5,000 per year, and of the assistant professors $3,000 a year, payable quarterly; they shall hold office during good behavior; they shall arrange all terms, courses, subjects of instruction, examinations, and report all delinquents to the governors. Sec. 10. That in the selection and appointment of said professors in every case, when qualified, the scientific experts now employed in the several bureaus of the Government service shall be preferred. Referred to Joint Committee on the Library. February 27, 1894—Senate. Mr. James H. Kyux introduced bill (S. 1708): That an institution shall be, and is hereby, established in the District of Columbia, to be called ‘The University of the United States,’’ where instruction shall be given in the higher branches of all departments of knowledge (practical as well as literary and scientific) and where facilities shall be furnished for research and investigation. Sec. 2. That the government of the university shall be vested in a board of regents and a council of faculties. Sec. 3. That the board of regents shall consist of one member from each State of the United States, to be appointed by the governor thereof, with the concurrence of the chief justice and the chief educational officer of his State; six members to be appointed by the President of the United States, with the advice and consent of the Senate; the following members ex officio, to wit: The President of the United States, who shall be honorary president of the board; the Vice-President of the United States, the Chief Justice of the United States, the Speaker of the House of Repre- sentatives, the Commissioner of Education, the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institu- tion, and the president of the university; fifteen to be a quorum. The regents and their successors are hereby created a body politic and corporate, with the name of ‘The Regents of the University of the United States,’’ and with power, subject to limitations herein prescribed, to adopt statutes for the government of the university, to elect the officers thereof, to determine the conditions of admission to the univer- 1656 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. sity, to confer such degrees, and such only, as are recommended by the council of faculties, and in general to perform any and all acts (not inconsistent herewith or with the Constitution and laws of the United States) which may be necessary to the ends herein proposed. Sec. 4. That the first meeting of the board of regents shall be called by the President of the United States, and shall be held in the city of Washington within three months after the passage of this act. At such meeting all members represent- ing the several States shall be divided, as nearly as possible, into six equal classes, such division being according to an alphabetical arrangement of the States by them represented. The classes thus formed shall be numbered in the order of such arrangement, and shall retire in such order at the end of one, two, three, four, five, and six years, respectively, and their successors shall be appointed thereafter for the term of six years. Ifthe governor of any State shall neglect to make such appoint- ment within three months after the notice of a vacancy for such State, the board may fill the same by the election of some suitable citizen thereof. The regents first appointed by the President shall retire in the order of their names on the list of appointments at the end of one, two, three, four, five, and six years, and their sue- cessors thereafter shall be appointed for the term of six years. In order to the full- est efficiency, the board of regents shall designate seven of its members, including the president of the university as chairman ex officio, to act as an executive commit- tee, with authority to choose the members of faculties and all employees of the university and fix their compensation, as well as to transact ordinary current business, and to perform such other duties as are imposed. The six members appointed shall be chosen for one, two, three, four, five, and six years, respectively, and their suc- cessors shall be appointed for the term of six years. Meetings of the board shall be held annually for the transaction of general business and the conferring of degrees. Special meetings may also be held upon call of the executive committee as the exigencies of the university shall require. Sec. 5. That the chief officer of the university shall be a president chosen by the board of regents, and hold office during their pleasure. He shall be president of the board of regents and of ;the council of faculties; shall have general supervision of the university, and discharge such other duties as are prescribed by the board or by the council of faculties. The treasurer of the university shall also be appointed by the regents and give bonds approved by them. He shall perform the duties usually required of such officers and such other duties as are imposed by the board of regents. Src. 6, That the council of faculties, embracing the president of the university and all heads of faculties, shall be charged with the planning and direction of instruction and discipline in the several departments, and with the other duties prescribed in the statutes or designated by the regents. Sec. 7. That the immediate government of each faculty shall be intrusted to its own members. Its chairman, to be known as dean of the faculty, shall be chosen by the executive committee on the recommendation of the president of the univer- sity, and shall be responsible for the supervision of its internal affairs. Sec. 8. That no chair for instruction sectarian in religion or partisan in politics shall be maintained upon funds derived from the general university endowment, or permitted in any form, and no sectarian or partisan test shall be allowed in the appointment of professors to the chairs so endowed and maintained, or in the selec- tion of any officer of the university; but chairs or faculties for instruction in any department of learning may be endowed by gift, devise, or bequest, and the parties endowing the same, or their legally authorized trustees, shall have the privilege, sub- ject to the approval of the board of regents, of designating the titles thereof and the instruction to which such endowment shall be devoted. No amount less than $100,000, however, shall be considered a full endowment for any chair in the univer- — FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS, 1893-1895. 1657 sity. Existing institutions which are free from controlling obligations of a sectarian or partisan nature and have endowments sufficient to support a faculty may, with the approval of the regents, and on terms prescribed by them, become faculties or departments of the university, still retaining or adopting such titles as they may prefer. Src. 9. That the facilities afforded by the university shall be open to all who are competent to use them, on conditions prescribed by the executive committee, with the advice of the faculties and officers directly concerned; but degrees shall be con- ferred upon such persons only as have previously received the degree of bachelor of arts, or some equivalent degree, from some institution recognized for this purpose by the university authorities. Src. 10. That in order to extend the privileges of the university and to improve the collegiate and other grades of public instruction in the country, it is provided that each State and Territory of the United States, in the ratio of population, shall be entitled to free scholarships of such number, not less than one for each Repre- sentative and Delegate in Congress and two for each Senator, as the board of regents shall determine. The executive committee of the board of regents may, for suffi- cient reasons, withhold the award of any scholarship or cancel its privileges or those of any student in the university. Src. 11. That for the advancement of science and learning by means of researches and investigations, there shall be established fellowships in the university of such character and number as the interests to be represented and the resources at com- mand shall warrant, which fellowships shall yield a partial or a full support, as the regents shall determine. They may be provided for out of the university income, or may be endowed by gift or otherwise, and the persons, organizations, corporate bodies, or States endowing them may, subject to the approval of the board of regents, designate their titles and the researches or investigations they shall be used to encourage. Sec. 12. That in the admission and appointment of persons to places in the uni- versity, character and competency shall be the sole test of qualifications. Src. 13. That as a means of partially providing building sites for the several departments of the university, the following tract of land, selected and appropriated by President Washington for the site of the national university proposed by him and in part actually endowed by provisions of his last will and testament, to wit, that tract in the city of Washington long known as ‘‘ University Square,’’ and now occupied by the National Observatory, is hereby granted and set apart for the use and benefit of the university of the United States when no longer required for observatory purposes. Sec. 14. That for the practical establishment, support, and maintenance of the uni- versity, there is hereby appropriated and set apart one-half the net proceeds of the sales of the public lands, as the same shall accrue from year to year. Of this amount one-half shall be held by the Treasurer of the United States for use in securing and improving grounds for the seat of the university, for providing the necessary build- ings and equipments, and for conducting the institution after its opening; but the remaining one-half shall be allowed to accumulate in the Treasury as a permanent fund, yielding interest at the rate of 5 per centum per annum, as a further revenue, until such fund, together with the endowments from other sources, shall be sufficient for the support of the university, after which all the net proceeds of the sales of public land so used for university purposes shall be passed to the general fund, or otherwise used, as Congress shall determine. All moneys held by the Treasurer of the United States under the provisions of this act shall be subject to requisitions drawn, as may be necessary, by the president and secretary of the Board of Regents under its order, but with this limitation, namely, that, after the first five years sub- sequent to the organization of the board, not more than 10 per centum of the afore- 1658 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. mentioned proceeds available for the erection of buildings and providing equipments shall be so used in any one year. Sec. 15. That the Board of Regents shall have power to receive and administer all such gifts, devises, and bequests as are made for the benefit of the university; which gifts, devises, and bequests, if in money, shall be deposited with the Treasurer of the United States, who shall pay interest thereon quarterly at the rate of 5 per centum per annum. Src. 16. That after the formal opening of the university for instruction the members thereof, under rules approved by the officers, subject to any regulations prescribed by Congress, shall have access to all institutions, collections, and opportunities for study and research under control of the Government, so far as the same can be accorded without detriment to the public service; and to the end that all such facili- ties may be utilized to the fullest extent and that the Government service may in turn derive the largest benefit from the work done in the university, the heads of all bureaus, institutions, and other organizations of the Government, whose work is of a sort to justify it, shall be, by the executive committee of the board, brought into such advisory and co-operative relations with the heads of corresponding depart- ments of the university as such committee, with the advice of the heads of faculties, and the aforesaid officers of the Government shall agree upon as being advantageous. Sec. 17. That at the close of the fiscal year the board of regents shall make a report to Congress, showing the operations, conditions, and wants of the university, one copy of which shall be transmitted free to all institutions of learning endowed by the Government under any act of Congress and to all other institutions of learn- ing in the United States whose degrees are recognized by this university. Referred to Select Committee to Establish the University of the United States. May 10, 1894—Senate. Mr. Eppa Hunton reported with aeeeeis bill (S. 1708): That a body corporate shall be, and is hereby, established in the District of Colum- bia, to be called ‘‘ The University of the United States,’”’ in which instruction shall be given in the higher branches of all departments of knowledge (practical as well as literary and scientific) and where facilities shall be furnished for scientific and literary research and investigation, which suid corporation shall have the power to make and adopt a corporate seal, to sue and be sued, to take by devise or gift any real or personal property, and all other powers proper and necessary to carry out the provisions of this act. Sec. 2. That the government of the university shall be vested in a board of regents and a council of faculties, as hereinafter constituted. Sec. 3. That the board of regents shall consist of eight members, no two of whom shall be from the same State, and who shall be citizens of the United States and citizens of the State, Territory, or district from which they are selected, and who shall be appointed by the President of the United States, with the advice and consent of the Senate, the following members ex officio, to wit: The President of the United States, who shall be honorary president of the board, the Vice-President of the United States, the Chief Justice of the United States, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Commissioner of Education, the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, and the president of the university. The board of regents shall have power, subject to limitations hevein prescribed, to adopt rules and regulations for the government of the university, to elect the officers thereof, to establish faculties, to determine the conditions of admission to the university, to confer such degrees, and such only, asare recommended by the council of faculties, and in general to perform ee ee ee ee FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS, 1893-1895. 1659 any and all acts (not inconsistent herewith or with the Constitution and laws of the United States) which may be necessary to the ends herein proposed. Src. 4. That the first meeting of the board of regents shall be called by the Presi- dent of the United States, and shall be held in the city of Washington within three months after the passage of this act. At such meeting all appointive members shall be divided, as nearly as possible, into four equal classes. The classes thus formed shall be numbered in the order of such division, and shall retire from the board in such order at the end of one, two, three, and four years, respectively, and their suc- cessors shall be appointed thereafter for the term of four years. In order to the fullest efficiency the board of regents shall annually designate five of its members, includ- ng the president of the university as chairman ex officio, to act as an executive com- mittee, with authority to choose the members of faculties and all employees of the university and fix their compensation and pay the same, as well as to transact ordinary current business and to perform such other duties as are imposed. Meetings of the board shall be held annually for the transaction of general business and the conferring of degrees. Special meetings may also be held upon call of the executive committee as the exigencies of the university shall require. Sec. 5. That the chief officer of the university shall be a president chosen by the board of regents and shall hold office during their pleasure. He shall be president of the board of regents and of the council of faculties, shall have general super- vision of the university, and discharge such other duties as are prescribed by the board or by the council of faculties. The treasurer of the university shall also be appointed by the regents and give bonds, to be approved by them. He shall per- form the duties usually required of such officers and such other duties as are imposed by the board of regents. Sec. 6. That the council of faculties shall consist of the president of the university and the deans of faculties, and shall be charged with the planning and direction of instruction and discipline in the several departments and with the other duties prescribed in the statutes or designated by the regents. Sec. 7. That the immediate government of each faculty shall be intrusted to its own members. Its chairman, to be known as dean of the faculty, shall be chosen by the executive committee on the recommendation of the president of the university and shall be responsible for the supervision of its internal affairs. Sec. 8. That no chair for instruction sectarian in religion or partisan in politics shall be permitted in any form, and no sectarian or partisan test shall be required or allowed in the appointment of professors or in the selection of any officer of the university. No amount less than $100,000 shall be considered a full endowment for any chair in the university. Existing institutions which are free from controlling obligations of a sectarian or partisan nature and have endowments sufficient to support a faculty may, with the approval of the regents and on terms prescribed by them, become faculties or departments of the university, still retaining or adopt- ing such titles as they may prefer. Sec. 9. That the facilities afforded by the university shall be open to all who are competent to use them, on conditions prescribed by the executive committee, with the advice of the faculties directly concerned; but degrees shall be conferred upon such persons only as have previously received the degree of bachelor of arts, or some equivalent degree, or who have received certificates of graduation from some State educational institution. Sec. 10. That in order to extend the privileges of the university and to improve the collegiate and other grades of public instruction in the country it is provided that each State and Territory of the United States, in the ratio of population, shall be entitled to free scholarships of such number, not less than one for each Representa- tive and Delegate in Congress and two for each Senator, as the Board of Regents shall determine. The executive committee of the Board of Regents may, for sufficient 1660 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. reasons, withhold the award of any scholarship, or cancel its privileges or the privi- leges of any student in the university. Src. 11. That for the advancement of science and learning by means of researches and investigations there shall be established fellowships in the university of such character and number as the interests to be represented and the resources at com- mand shall warrant, which fellowships shall yield a partial or a full support, as the regents shall determine. They may be provided for out of the university income, or may be endowed by gift or otherwise, and the persons, organizations, corporate bodies, or States endowing them may, subject to the approval of the Board of Regents, designate their titles and the researches or investigations they shall be used to encourage. Src. 12. That in the admission and appointment of persons to places or privileges in the university character and competency shall be the sole test of qualifications. Src. 13. That as a means of partially providing building sites for the several depart- ments of the university, the following tract of land, selected and appropriated by President Washington for the site of the national university proposed by him and in part actually endowed by provisions of his last will and testament, to wit, that tract in the city of Washington long known as ‘‘ University Square’’ and heretofore occupied by the National Observatory, is hereby granted and set apart for the use and benefit of the university of the United States. Src. 14. That for the practical establishment, support, and maintenance of the university there is hereby appropriated and set apart one-third of the net proceeds of the sales of the public lands, as the same shall accrue from year to year, for the period of ten years from the passage of this act, after which the appropriation hereby provided for shall cease. Of this amount one-half shall be held by the Treasurer of the United States for use in securing and improving grounds for the seat of the uni- versity, for providing the necessary buildings and equipments, and for conducting the institution after its opening; but the remaining one-half shall be allowed to accu- mulate in the Treasury of the United States as a permanent fund, yielding interest at the rate of 5 per centum per annum asa further and permanent revenue, which interest shall be used for the purpose of conducting the university and defraying its expenses. All moneys held by the Treasurer of the United States under the provisions of this act shall be subject to such requisitions drawn, as may be necessary, by the president and secretary of the Board of Regents, under the order of said board, but with this limitation, namely, that after the first five years subsequent to the organization of the board not more than 10 per centum of the aforementioned proceeds available for the erection of buildings and providing equipments shall be so used in any one year. Src. 15. That the Board of Regents shall have power to receive and administer all such gifts, devises, and bequests as are made for the benefit of the university, which gifts, devises, and bequests, if in money, shall be deposited with the Treasurer of the United States, who shall pay interest thereon quarterly at the rate of 5 per centum per annum. 7 Src. 16. That after the formal opening of the university for instruction the mem- bers thereof, under rules approved by the officers, subject to any regulations pre- scribed by Congress, shall have access to all institutions, collections, and opportuni- ties for study and research under control of the Government, so far as the same can be accorded without detriment to the public service; and to the end that all such facilities may be utilized to the fullest extent and that the Government service may in turn derive the largest benefit from the work done in the university, the heads of all bureaus, institutions, and other organizations of the Government whose work is of a sort to justify it, shall be, by the executive committee of the board, brought into such advisory and co-operative relations with the heads of corresponding departments of the university as such committee, with the advice of the heads of faculties, and the aforesaid officers of the Government shall agree upon as being advantageous. FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS, 1893-1895. 1661 Src. 17. That at the close of the fiscal year the Board of Regents shall make a report to Congress, showing the operations, conditions, and wants of the university, one copy of which shall be transmitted free to all institutions of learning endowed by the Government under any act of Congress, and to all other institutions of learning in the United States whose degrees are recognized by this university. . NATIONAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY. September 6, 1893—House. Mr. J. W. Covert introduced bill (H. 385) to incorporate the National Historical Society. Referred to Committee on the Library. NATIONAL MUSEUM—ARMORY BUILDING. September 12, 1893—House. Letter from the Treasury Department with estimates for $12,000 for repairing, etc., Armory building.’ _ Referred to Committee on Appropriations. December 21, 1893. Urgent deficiency act for 1894, ete. For supporting roof, strengthening of floors, and general repairs to the so-called Armory building, now occupied jointly by the United States Commission of Fish and Fisheries and the United States National Museum, including reconstructing elevator, and for standpipes and fire- escapes, the work to be done under the supervision and direction of the Architect of the Capitol, $7,100. (Stat., XXVIII, 17.) NATIONAL MUSEUM—NEW BUILDING. December 6, 1893—Senate. Mr. J. S. Morrixz introduced bill (S. 1195): That for an additional fireproof building for the use of the National Museum, 300 feet square, with two stories and a basement, to be erected under the direction of the Architect of the Capitol, with the approval of the Regents of the Smithsonian Insti- tution, in accordance with plans now on file with the Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds, on the southwestern portion of the grounds of the Smithsonian Institu- tion, there shall be appropriated, out of any moneys in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, the sum of $500,000; said building to be placed west of the Smithsonian Institution, leaving a roadway between it and the latter of not less than 50 feet, with its north front on a line with the south face of the Agricultural Department and of the Smithsonian Institution, and constructed as far as practicable, after proper adver- tisement, by contract or contracts, awarded to the lowest responsible bidder; and all expenditures for the purposes herein mentioned shall be audited by the proper officers of the Treasury Department. Referred to Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds. 1 Fifty-third Congress, first session, House Ex. Doc. 7,10 pp. Twolargeplans. Let- ters from officials and laws passed relative to occupancy of Armory by the National Museum and U. 8. Fish Commission, 1662 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. NATIONAL MUSEUM—SUNDAY AND EVENING OPENING. May 28, 1894—House. Mr. AtteN C. DurBorrow, Jr., introduced joint resolution (H. 183): That the officers in charge of the Smithsonian Institution, the National Museum, the Botanical Gardens, and the Washington Monument be, and hereby are, instructed to keep those properties open to the public on every week day from 9 antemeridian to 6 postmeridian, and on Sunday from 9 antemeridian to 4 postmeridian, and on not less than three evenings every week from 7 to 10 o’clock. Referred to Committee on Public Buildings and Grounds. NATIONAL MUSEUM—ESTIMATES. December 4, 1893—House. For the Smithsonian Institution, for printing labels and blanks, and for the ‘‘ bulletins” and annual volumes of the ‘‘ proceedings” of the National Museum, $18,000. Notr.—The proceedings and bulletins of the National Museum, printed under this appropriation, are not ‘‘ public documents,”’ hence no part of the edition is regularly apportioned for distribution by the Senate and House or to the legal depositories. The edition of 3,000 copies now printed is only sufficient to supply, in limited meas- ure, the very urgent requests from public libraries, educational institutions, and scientific investigators in the United States and throughout the world. One of the principal objects in asking for a larger appropriation is to enable the Museum to place a full series of its publications in representative libraries in different parts of each State. It is not the intention that the annual number of issues of the proceedings and bul- letins should be increased, but that a larger edition of each should be printed. On account of the small edition the Museum fails to receive in exchange the valuable publications of many scientific institutions. The amounts hitherto appropriated, though expended with strict economy, have been found inadequate. For binding scientific books and pamphlets presented to and acquired by the National Museum library, $1,000. Norr.—There being no appropriation for binding, many valuable books in the Museum library are rendered practically useless and are in danger of damage, and many valuable publications, chiefly gifts, and important scientific serials can not be used for fear of injuring them, and are, in spite of care, in danger of destruction. Formerly, when the Museum was more closely connected with the Department of the Interior, the books in its library were bound at the Government bindery at the expense of that Department, but since this connection has ceased no books what- ever have been bound. For continuing the preservation, exhibition, and increase of the collections from the surveying and exploring expeditions of the Gov- ernment, and from other sources, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $132,500. (The Smithsonian Institution estimates for an increase in this item of $47,500 over the present appropriation. ) EN a FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS, 1893-1895. 1668 Norre.—From this appropriation are paid all expenses, not only for the preserva- tion and increase of the collections, but for watchmen, cleaners, and other employees whose duty it is to keep the exhibition halls in order and provide for the comfort of visitors. The appropriations for 1893 and 1894 were greatly reduced from those of the preceding years and scarcely exceeded that for 1887, although the collections are very much larger and more yaluable and the number of visitors and students has largely increased. It is impossible with the present force to properly provide for the care of the Museum, and in several departments it has been necessary to suspend work almost entirely, especially since during the last two years the time of the employees has been diverted very largely to preparation for the World’s Columbian Exposition. More assistants, especially in the lower grade, are needed, as well as a somewhat larger number of paid curators, for a majority of the curators are now volunteers, receiving no compensation and only able to devote their leisure to the work of the Museum. For the safe-keeping of the collections, whose increase in value has ren- dered the responsibility of custody much greater, the force of watchmen should also be increased; while to insure proper cleanliness of the floors and cases a larger num- ber of laborers and cleaners should be employed than is possible with the appropri- ation for the present year. For cases, furniture, fixtures, and appliances required for the exhibi- tion and safe-keeping of the collections of the National Museum, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $10,000. (The Smithsonian Institution estimates for an increase in this item of $20,000 over the present appropriation.) Note.—From this appropriation are paid the expenses of construction of new cases and the keeping of the old ones in repair, the latter being an item of considerable expense owing to the necessary wear and damage occasioned by the large number of visitors to the exhibition halls. From this appropriation also, in accordance with long usage, expenses for the repair and maintenance of the Museum buildings, such as patching and painting the roofs, painting the woodwork, relaying wooden floors, the maintenance and improvement of the public-comfort rooms, and the sewerage system, are paid; and this—a matter which is becoming more expensive as years go by—renders it necessary that a number of competent mechanics should be employed. Aiter the expenses of maintenance of buildingsand of the numerous cases already on hand have been paid, very little remains for new cases and fixtures, although it is necessary that a considerable number of these shall be built every year for the recep- tion of objects added to the collections, since valuable collections are constantly being offered as gifts on the condition that suitable receptacles shall be made for them. During the coming year it will be necessary to provide for a considerable number of important exhibits acquired as a result of the World’s Columbian Expo- sition, either by gift from foreign governments or from other Departments of the Government, in accordance with the law establishing the Museum. The appropria- tion for 1894 was insufficient for current needs, necessitating a reduction of the regu- lar foree of mechanics and laborers to two carpenters, one painter, three skilled laborers, and one laborer; and it is therefore especially important that the entire amount asked for shall be granted. For the expense of heating, lighting, electrical, telegraphic, and telephonic service for the National Museum, $11,000. (The Smithsonian Institution estimates for an increase in this item of $4,000 over the present appropriation.) 1664 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Norr.—The reduction of this appropriation in 1893 to $11,000 made a deficiency necessary for that year. The same conditions exist in 1894, and there is no reason to suppose that in 1895 any reduction will be possible. With a less amount than that asked for it is impossible to maintain a sufficiently high temperature in winter for the comfort of visitors and employees, and at the same time to make the neces- sary repairs of the steam boilers and pipes, burglar alarms, telephone wires, and other steam and electrical apparatus. The force of firemen is inadequate, and should be increased. For postage stamps and foreign postal cards for the National Museum, $500. For the erection of two galleries, one in the southwest court, the other in the southeast range, National Museum building; said gal- leries to be constructed of iron beams, supported by iron pillars and protected by iron railings, and provided with suitable staircases; the work to be done under the direction of the Architect of the Capitol and in accordance with the approval of the Secretary of the Smith- sonian Institution, $8,000. Norr.—The erection of these galleries will add materially to the area available in the present Museum building for exhibition and storage purposes. Such galleries were provided for in the original plans of the building. They can be supported in such a manner as not to detract from the appearance of the halls or to interfere with the present installation of the collections. For tearing down and rebuilding the brick walls of the steam boilers, providing tie-rods and buck staves and grates for the same; removing, replacing, and resetting the fronts; and replacing worn-out boiler tubes, and for covering heating pipes with fireproof material, includ- ing all necessary labor and material, $4,000. Norr.—The walls of the steam boilers have been under fire for thirteen years, and are now in such condition that safety requires that they should be immediately rebuilt. The fronts are cracked and a large proportion of the tubes are worn out and unserviceable. February 1, 1894—House. The Secretary of the Treasury transmitted a list of claims allowed by the First Comptroller of the Treasury Department [Executive Document No. 93]. Smithsonian Institution: Baltimore and Ohio R. R. Co., preservation of collections, National Museum ‘(certifted claims), for 1890-0 [22 ie enon om penn on eecueeee $18. 12 Sioux City and Pacific Railway Co., same, for 1890 -........----------- .O1 Atlantic. angseacmic R.'R: Coz, same, tor 1890 22eee se ee eee eee 1.50 Central Paciiic Railway Co.,'same, for 1891 2. .-22 25202 oe oe cece ae 3. 51 Southern Pacthie)Co., same; ford89lio-5 se. see ee eee eee walls; Motdl - 22. 2....... 12 Sota. See ee eee 23, 29 Referred to Committee on Appropriations. FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS, 1893-1895. 1665 February 8, 1894—House. Deficiency estimates for 1894, ete. _ For the expenses of heating the United States National Museum for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1894, $1,000. Norr.—The appropriation this year is $11,000. It will be impossible to properly heat the Museum buildings and workshops for the remainder of the season unless additional fuel is procured. The sum of $2,000 was appropriated to cover the defi- ciency last year, but it is believed that on account of the mildness’ of the present winter the addition of $1,000 to the current appropriation this year will be sufficient to meet all demands. December 3, 1894—House. Estimates for 1896. For the Smithsonian Institution, for printing labels and blanks, and for the ‘* Bulletins” and annual volumes of the ‘‘ Proceedings” of the National Museum, and binding scientific books and pamphlets presented to and acquired by the National Museum library, $18,000. .Notr.—The Museum has several important works on the natural history of the United States ready to print, and others nearly ready. Notwithstanding the fact that there is a constantly increasing demand for information of this kind from the schools and public libraries, which the Museum staff is quite able to meet without asking more money for the purpose, the appropriation for printing is scarcely greater than it was six years ago ($10,000), and much less than in 1892, and the publication of these works upon the natural resources of the country is delayed, and not so effectively done as is desired. One of the principal objects in asking for a larger appropriation is to enable the Museum to place a full series of its publications in representative libraries in different parts of each State. The Proceedings and Bulletins of the National Museum, printed under this appropriation, are not ‘‘ public docu- ments;’’ hence no part of the edition is regularly apportioned for distribution by the Senate dnd House, or to the legal depositories. The edition now printed is only sufficient to supply in limited measures the very urgent requests from public libraries, educational institutions, and scientific investigators in the United States and through- out the world. On account of the small edition, the Museum fails to receive in exchange the valuable publications of many scientific institutions. The amounts hitherto appropriated, though expended with strict economy, have been found inadequate. The latter portion of this title of appropriation is, in the present year, covered by a separate appropriation of $1,000. For continuing the preservation, exhibition, and increase of the col- lections from the surveying and exploring expeditions of the Govern- ment, and from other sources, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $180,000. Nore.—From this appropriation are paid all expenses, not only for the preservation and increase of collections, but for cleaners, watchmen, and other employees whose duty it is to keep the exhibition halls in proper condition and provide for the comfort of visitors. The constant growth of the collections, the steady increase in the number of visitors, and the yearly extending demands of educational institutions and of the public upon the Museum, render the appropriations of the present year insufficient, though slightly increased above the appropriation for the preceding year. It is H. Doc. 732 105 1666 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. desirable that a certain amount of money be appropriated for the purchase of specimens which can not be obtained otherwise, and which are indispensable for completing series in the collections, and which, if not secured, are constantly being bought by the museums of Europe. It is also very desirable that the number of persons in the paid scientific staff should be increased. At present much of the scientific work is performed by volunteers without compensation, a system which is found advantageous to a limited extent only. With this aid from specialists, not even connected with the Museum, it is impossible for the curators and their assistants to perform the urgent work of their departments. In a degree this is attributable to the growing frequency of the demands of educational institutions and the outside public upon the staff for information and aid. For the safe-keeping of the collections, whose increase in value has rendered the responsibility of custody much greater, the force of watchmen should also be increased, while to insure proper cleanliness of the floors and cases a larger number of laborers and cleaners should be employed than is possible with the appropriation of the present year. For cases, furniture, fixtures, and appliances required for the exhi- bition and safe-keeping of the collections of the National Museum, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $30,000. Norr.—Valuable collections are constantly being offered to the Museum ag gifts, on the condition that suitable cases be made for them. In view of the great reduc- tion of the appropriation for furniture and fixtures, the necessary annual expenditures for receptacles and other fittings for the preservation and exhibition of specimens, and the cost of keeping the cases already on hand in repair and adapting them to other purposes, a very small amount is left for providing the necessary number of new cases. For the expense of heating, lighting, electrical, telegraphic, and telephonic service for the National Museum, $15,000. Norr.—With a less amount than that asked for it is impossible to maintain a suffi- ciently high temperature in winter for the comfort of employees and visitors, and at the same time to make necessary repairs of the burglar alarms, telephone wires, and other steam and electrical apparatus. The force of firemen is inadequate and should be increased. . For postage stamps and foreign postal cards for the National Museum, $500. For the erection of galleries in two or more halls of the National Museum building; said galleries to be constructed of iron beams, supported by iron pillars, and protected by iron railings, and pro- vided with suitable staircases; the work to be done under the direc- tion of the Architect of the Capitol, and in accordance with the approval of the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, $8,000. Nore.—The erection of these galleries will add materially to the area available in the present Museum building for exhibition and storage purposes. Such galleries were provided for in the original plans of the building. They can be supported in such a manner as not to detract from the appearance of the halls or to interfere with the installation of the collections. For repairs to buildings, shops, and sheds, National Museum, includ- ing all necessary labor and material, $8,000. FLFTY-THIRD CONGRESS, 1893-1895. 1667 Nore.—The repairs required for the buildings of the Museum become more expen- sive as years go by. The slate and tin roofs of the main building are growing old; the gutters and down-spouts need constant care; the woodwork exposed to the weather needs paint; many window sash and frames should be repaired or replaced; and there are 10,000 feet of rotten floors and timbers, both unsightly and dangerous, which should be removed and replaced by granolithic blocks or artificial stone. For expenses of putting in four additional fire plugs in the Smith- sonian grounds for the better protection of the Smithsonian Insti- tution, National Museum, and Astrophysical Observatory, and the purchase of necessary fire hose, $800. Norr.—These plugs were recommended by the chief engineer of the fire depart- ment, District of Columbia, in a letter dated February 23, 1894, a copy of which is herewith transmitted: District or CoLumsrIA Fire DEPARTMENT, Washington, D. C., February 23, 1894. Sir: I have the honor to state that I made an examination of the water protection for the ‘‘Smithsonian Institution and National Museum”’ buildings in case of fire. I find there is only one plug in the grounds, and I would therefore respectfully rec- ommend that three additional fire plugs be erected, to be placed at convenient distances, as I consider them necessary for the public safety. Very respectfully, JosEPH Parris, Chief Engineer. Hon. §. P. Lanciey, Secretary Smithsonian Institution. December 7, 1894—House. Letter from the Acting Secretary of the Treasury. TREASURY DEPARTMENT, December 6, 189}. Str: I have the honor to transmit herewith, for the consideration of Congress, an estimate of appropriation submitted by the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution under date of November 24, 1894, for rent of workshops and for storage for the National Museum for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1896, $2,000. Respectfully, yours, W. E. Curtis, Acting Secretary. The SPEAKER OF THE House oF REPRESENTATIVES. SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, Washington, D. C., November 24, 1894. Str: I have the honor to submit herewith an estimate for the sum of $2,000, for the rent of workshops and storage for the National Museum. This estimate was by mistake omitted from the estimates of the Smithsonian Institution for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1896. Yours, very respectfully, S. P. Lanetry, Secretary. 1668 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Estimates of appropriations required for the service of the fiscal year ending June 30, 1896, by the Smithsonian Institution, United States National Museum. Total amount | Amount ap- to be appro- |propriated for priated the current under each | fiscal year head of ap- | ending June propriation. 30, 1895 Detailed objects of expenditure, and explanations. National Museum: For workshops [and storage] for National Museum (Mar. 12, 1894, vol. 28, p. 48, sec.1; Aug. 18, 1894, vol. 28, p. 383, sec.1) .........-...-.- $2, 000. 00 $600. 00 Nore.—This estimate is made necessary by act approved March 12, 1894, giving the Fish Commission possession of the so-called Armory Building, used by the National Museum for workshops and storage purposes. A building, No. 1005 B street NW., was rented at the rate of $900 a year, but it is not large enough to hold workshops and the collections given to the Museum at the close of the World’s Fair in Chicago, for which there isno roomin the present building. Much valuable material is now stored in wooden sheds which are not fireproof. It is thought that with the sum asked for it will be possible to obtain enough storage room to relieve the pressure in part until additional building accommodations of some kind are provided. Referred to Committee on Appropriations. NATIONAL MUSEUM—APPROPRIATIONS. February 3, 1894—House. Mr. Josep D. Sayers, from Committee on Appropriations, sub- mitted report (H. 348) on H. 5575 (sundry civil bill for 1895), which contained item: Appropriation | Estimate for | Recommended for 1894. 1895. for 1895. National) Museum.) os5y555.6-.6 cheb sb Ae oe $154, 000 $154, 000 $170, 500 March 12, 1894. Urgent deficiency act for 1894, ete. For rent for workshops for the National Museum and for expenses of transfer from the so-called Armory building, $1,000, or so much thereof as may be necessary. (Stat., XXVIII, 43.) August 18, 1894. Sundry civil act for 1895. For continuing the preservation, exhibition, and increase of the col- lections from the surveying and exploring expeditions of the Govern- ment, and from other sources, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $143,000. For cases, furniture, fixtures, and appliances required for the exhi- bition and safe-keeping of the collections of the National Museum, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $10,000. For expense of heating, lighting, electrical, telegraphic, and tele- phonic service for the National Museum, $13,000. For postage stamps and foreign postal cards for the National Museum, $500. FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS, 1893-1895. 1669 For tearing down and rebuilding the brick walls of the steam boilers, providing tie-rods and buck staves and grates for the same; removing, replacing, and resetting the fronts; and replacing worn-out boiler tubes, and for covering heating pipes with fireproof material, including all necessary labor and material, $4,000. ° For rent for workshops for the National Museum, $600. (Stat., XXVIII, 383.) For the Smithsonian Institution, for printing labels and blanks and for the ‘‘ Bulletins” and annual volumes of ‘‘ Proceedings” of the National Museum, $11,000. ' For binding scientific books and pamphlets presented to and acquired by the National Museum library, $1,000. (Stat., XXVIII, 420.) August 23, 1894. Deficiency act for 1894, ete. For preservation of collections, National Museum, except for service over Pacific railroads, $19.62. _ [To cover claim reported in House Ex. Doc. 93, Fifty-third Congress, second session. | (Stat., XXVIII, 477. ) For preservation of collections, National Museum, $26.67. [To cover claim reported in Senate Ex. Doe. 152, _ Kifty-third Con- gress, second session. | (Stat., XXVIII, 482.) March 2, 1895. Sundry civil act for 1896. For continuing the preservation, exhibition, and increase of the col- lections from the surveying and exploring expeditions of the Govern- ment, and from other sources, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $143,225. For cases, furniture, fixtures, and appliances required for the exhi- bition and safe-keeping of the collections of the National Museum, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $12,500. For expense of heating, lighting, electrical, telegraphic, and tele- phonic service for the National Museum, $13,000. For postage stamps and foreign postal cards for the National Museum, $500. For repairs to buildings, shops, and sheds, National Museum, includ- ing all necessary labor and material, $4,000. For rent of workshops for the National Museum, $900. For expenses of putting in four additional fire plugs in the Smith- sonian grounds for the better protection of the Smithsonian Insti- tution, National Museum, and Astrophysical Observatory, and the purchase of necessary fire hose, $800. (Stat., XXVIII, 924.) 1670 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. For the Smithsonian Institution, for printing labels and blanks and for the ‘‘ Bulletins” and annual volumes of the ‘‘ Proceedings” of the National Museum, and binding scientific books and pamphlets, pre- sented to and acquired by the National Museum library, $12,000. (Stat., XX VIII, 960.) ; DOCUMENTS FOR THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION. October 19, 1893-House. A bill (H. 2650) providing for public printing, and the distribution of public documents being under consideration, the clerk read: To the library of each of the eight Executive Departments, and to the Naval Observ- atory, one bound copy. Mr. James D. Ricuarpson. I offer the amendment which I send: to the desk. Amend line 321, after the word ‘‘ Observatory,’’ by inserting ‘‘ Smithsonian Insti- tution and the United States National Museum.”’ Agreed to. CONTRACTS FOR SUPPLIES. October 25, 1893-House. Mr. ALExANDER M. Dockery introduced bill (H. 4248): That section 3709 of the Revised Statutes is amended by adding thereto the fol- lowing: That hereafter in the several Executive Departments, the Department of Labor, United States Fish Commission, Interstate Commerce Commission, Smithsonian Insti- tution, Government Printing Office, and the offices of the government of the District of Columbia the bids for annual supplies of fuel, ice, stationery, and other miscella- neous articles, including those for the State, War, and Navy building, shall be opened at 2 o’clock post meridian upon the same day; that the Secretary of the Treasury, or an official named by him, shall designate the day in each year upon which bids shall be opened in said Executive Departments and other Government establishments in the city of Washington, and notice of such designation shall be given to each of them at least 40 days before the date named; that before contracts are awarded under bids submitted hereunder, schedules of all such bids shall be prepared and submitted to a board consisting of the chief clerks of the Treasury, Interior, and Post-Office Departments, or such other official representative of each of said Executive Depart- ments as the heads thereof may designate, and it shall be the duty of said board, ora majority thereof, ata meeting or meetings to be called by the representative thereon of the Treasury Department, who shall be the chairman of said board, to make careful comparison of all of the bids contained in such schedules, and to recommend to the persons authorized to make contracts acceptance or rejection of any or all of said bids. If all of the bids for any one or more articles for any of said Executive Departments and other Government establishments are rejected on the recommendation of the board, proposals for such articles shall again be invited, after due advertisement, which said proposals shall be submitted by the Departments or offices receiving the same to the said board for comparison. and recommendation. Referred to Joint Commission of Congress to inquire into the status of Laws Organizing the Executive Departments. an FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS, 1893-1895. 1671 October 30, 1893—House. A bill (H. 4292) reported in lieu of H. 4248 and passed. January 18, 1894—Senate. H. 4292 passed with amendment. January 20, 1894—House. The Speaker (Mr. Cuaruzs F. Crisp) laid before the House the bill (H. 4292) to amend section 3709 of the Revised Statutes, relating to contracts for supplies in the Departments at Washington, with Senate amendment. Mr. Newson DINGLEY, I r. Mr. Speaker, although this appears to be entirely a new bill, the Senate having struck out the House proposition and inserted a substitute, yet the only change made by the Senate has been to except the printing materials for both the Government Print- ing Office and Bureau of Printing and Engraving from the operation of the bill, and it was not the intention of the House to cover those materials, they being provided for elsewhere by law; but in making this substitute the Senate has made an error in taking it for granted that there was but one Assistant Secretary of the Treasury and Assist- ant Secretary of the Interior, and to correct that I offer an amendment to concur in the Senate amendment with the following amendment: On page 2 of the Senate amendment, strike out all after the word ‘‘board’’ in line 20 down to and including the word ‘‘ Department’ in line 25, and insert in lieu thereof the following: ‘‘Consisting of one of the Assistant Secretaries of the Treasury and Interior Departments, and one of the Assistant Postmasters-General, who shall be designated by the heads of said Departments and the Postmaster-General, respec- tively.” Senate amendment as amended agreed to. January 23, 1894—Senate. House amendment agreed to. January 27, 1894. Be vz enacted, etc., And the advertisement for such proposals shall be made by all the Executive Departments, including the Department of Labor, the United States Fish Commission, the Interstate Commerce Commission, the Smithsonian Institution, the Government Printing Office, the government of the District of Columbia, and the Superin- tendent of the State, War, and Navy building, except for paper and materials for use of the. Government Printing Office and materials used in the work of the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, which shall continue to be advertised for and purchased as now provided by law on the same days, and shall each designate 2 o’clock post meridian of such days for the opening of all such proposals in each Department and other Government establishments in the city of Washington; and the Secretary of the Treasury shall designate the day or days in each year for the opening of such proposals and shall give due notice thereof to the other Departments and Government establishments. 1672 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Such proposals shall be opened in the usual way and schedules _ thereof duly prepared, and, together with the statement of the pro- posed action of each Department and Government establishment thereon, shall be submitted to a board consisting of one of the Assist- ant Secretaries of the Treasury and Interior Departments and one of the Assistant Postmasters-General, who shall be designated by the heads of the said Departments and the Postmaster-General, respec- tively, at a meeting to be called by the official of the Treasury Depart- ment, who shall be chairman thereof, and said board shall carefully examine and compare all the proposals so submitted and recommend the acception or rejection of any or all of said proposals. And if any or all of such proposals shall be rejected, advertisements for proposals shall again be invited and proceeded with in the same manner. (Stat., XXVIII, 33.) REPORT OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION. November 3, 1893—Senate. Mr. J. S. Morrixx submitted concurrent resolution to print 10,000 copies of the Report of the Smithsonian Institution and National Museum for the year ending June 30, 1893, in two octavo volumes, 1,000 for Senate, 2,000 for House, 5,000 for Smithsonian Institution, and 2,000 for National Museum. Referred to Committee on Printing. December 5, 1893—House. Mr. J. D. Ricuarpson introduced Senate concurrent resolution. Referred to Committee on Printing. January 17, 1894—Senate. Mr. A. P. Gorman, from Committee on Printing, submitted report (S. 167) on. Senate concurrent resolution, with the recommendation that it pass. The number and distribution of this document provided for in the resolution are the same as regulated in the general printing bill passed by the Senate of the last Congress and now pending before this committee. The cost will be about $18,000. Passed. January 18, 1894—House. Passed. REPORT ON EXPENDITURES. December 4, 1893—House. The Spraxer (Mr. Cuarues F. Crisp) laid before the House a letter from the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution transmitting a detailed statement of expenditures of the appropriations committed FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS, 1893-1895. 1673 by Congress to the care of the Smithsonian Institution for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1893. Referred to Committee on Appropriations. December 22, 1894—House. The Speaker (Mr. Cares F. Crisp) laid before the House a com- munication from the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution (H. Misc. Doe. 40) transmitting a detailed statement of the expenditures of the appropriations committed by Congress to the care of the Smith- sonian Institution for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1894. Referred to Committee on Appropriations. INTERNATIONAL EXCHANGES—ESTIMATES. December 4, 1893—House. Estimates for 1895. For the expenses of the system of international exchanges between the United States and foreign countries under the direction of the Smithsonian Institution, including salaries or compensation of all nec: essary employees, $14,500. (The Smithsonian Institution estimates for an increase in this item of $8,500 over the present appropriation. ) Norr.—For 1892-93 $12,000 were appropriated, and a deficiency appropriation of $5,000 was subsequently made, and $1,483.99 were received from different Govern- ment bureaus. The service has been curtailed on account of the reduced appropriation for 1893-94, but to continue the work throughout the year a deficiency of about $2,500 is inevitable. Attention is called to the fact that the United States is under formal treaty obliga- tion to maintain this service. Advantage is now taken of the free freight privileges accorded the Institution by many steamship companies, thus materially reducing the cost. To meet the entire freight expense and give effect to a further treaty for the ‘‘immediate exchange of parliamentary documents,’”’ for which no appropriation has yet been made, the sum of $23,000 is estimated. February 8, 1894—House. Deficiency estimates for 1894. For the expenses of the system of international exchanges between the United States and foreign countries under the direction of the Smithsonian Institution, including salaries or compensation of all nec- essary employees, being a deficiency for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1894, $1,500. December 3, 1894—House. Estimates for 1896. For the expenses of the system of international exchanges between the United States and foreign countries under the direction of the Smithsonian Institution, including salaries or compensation of all nec- essary employees, $23,000. 1674 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Nors.—The exchange service is maintained in part by direct appropriations to the Smithsonian Institution and in part by specific appropriations to Government Departments, or by payments from their contingent funds for the transportation of reports abroad. In the estimate of $23,000 it is sought to bring these items under a single head, to make proper compensation to the many trans-Atlantic steamship lines that have hitherto accorded to the Institution the privilege of free freight, and to carry into effect a special treaty for the ‘‘immediate exchange of parliamentary docu- ments,’’ for which no appropriation has yet been made. INTERNATIONAL EXCHANGES—APPROPRIATIONS. February 3, 1894—House. Mr. JoserH D. Sayrrrs, from Committee on Appropriations, sub- mitted report (H. 348) on sundry civil bill for 1893 (H. 5575), which contained item: International exchanges: Appropriation for 1894, $14,500; estimate for 1895, $14,500; recommended for 1895, $17,000. July 31, 1894. Legislative, executive, and judicial act for 1895. Library of Congress: For compensation of * * * 8 [assistant_ librarians] at $1,400 each, one of whom shall be in charge of interna- tional exchanges. For expenses of exchanging public documents for the publications of foreign governments, $1,500. [This pays one clerk at $900 and one clerk at $600. | (Stat., XXVIII, 168.) Naval Observatory: For repairs [ete.] * * * freight (including transmission of public documents through the Smithsonian exchange), foreign postage and expressage [etc. ], $2,500. (Stat. XXVIII, 192.) Patent Office: For purchase of professional and scientific books and expenses of transporting publications of patents issued by the Patent Office to foreign governments, $2,000. (Stat., XXVIII, 196.) August 18, 1894. Sundry civil act for 1895. For expenses of the system of international exchanges between the United States and foreign countries, under the direction of the Smith- sonian Institution, including salaries or compensation of at necessary employees, $17, 000. (Stat., XXVIII, 384.) Gatloviea Beeccy: For the purchase of necessary books for the library, and the payment for the anaes of public documents through the Smithsonian exchange, $2,000. (Stat., XXVIII, 398.) War apartment: For the transportation of reports and maps to foreign countries through the Smithsonian Institution, $100. (Stat., XXVIII, 405.) FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS, 1893-1895. 1675 March 2, 1895. Legislative, executive, and judicial act for 1896. Library of Congress: For compensation of * * * 8 [assistant librarians] at $1,400 each, one of whom shall be in charge of interna- tional exchanges. : For expenses of exchanging public documents for the publications of foreign governments, $1,500. [This pays 1 clerk at $900 and 1 clerk at $600. ] (Stat., XXVIII, 771.) Naval Observatory: For repairs to buildings, [etc.] freight (includ- ing transmission of public documents through the Smithsonian exchange), foreign postage, and expressage, * * * $2,500. (Stat., XXVIII, 792.) Patent Office: For purchase of professional and scientific books and expenses of transporting publications of patents issued by the Patent Office to foreign Governments, $2,000. (Stat., XCX VIII, 797.) March 2, 1895. Sundry civil act for 1896. For expenses of the system of international exchanges between the United States and foreign countries, under the direction of the Smith- sonian Institution, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $17,000. (Stat., XXVIII, 924.) Geological Survey: For the purchase of necessary books for the library, and the payment for the transmission of public documents through the Smithsonian exchange, $2,000. (Stat., XXVIII, 940.) War Department: For the transportation of reports and maps to foreign countries through the Smithsonian Institution, $100. (Stat., XXVIII, 950.) BUREAU OF ETHNOLOGY—ESTIMATES. December 4, 1893—House. Estimates for 1895. For continuing ethnological researches among the American Indians, under the direction of the Smithsonian Institution, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $40,000, of which sum not exceding $1,000 may be used for rent of building, $40,000. (The Smithsonian Institution estimates for an increase in this item of $10,000 over the present appropriation.) December 3, 1894—House. Estimates for 1896. For continuing ethnological researches among the American Indians, under the direction of the Smithsonian Institution, including salaries 1676 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. or compensation of all necessary employees, of which sum not exceed- ing $1,000 may be used for rent of building, $50,000. BUREAU OF ETHNOLOGY—APPROPRIATIONS. February 3, 1894—House. a Mr. JoserpH D. Sayers, from Committee on Appropriations, sub- mitted. report (H. 348) on H. 5575 (sundry civil bill for 1895), which — contained the following item: North American Ethnology: Appropriation for 1894, $40,000; esti- mate for 1895, $40,000; recommended for 1895, $40,000. August 18, 1894. Sundry civil act for 1895. For continuing ethnological researches among the American Indians, under the direction of the Smithsonian Institution, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $40,000, of which sum not exceeding $1,000 may be used for rent.of building. (Stat., XXVIII, 384.) March 2, 1895. Sundry civil act for 1896. For continuing ethnological researches among the American Indians, under the direction of the Smithsonian Institution, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, $40,000, of which sum not exceeding $1,000 may be used for rent of building. (Stat., XXVIII, 925.) ASTROPHYSICAL OBSERVATORY—ESTIMATES. December 4, 1893—House. Estimates for 1895. For maintenance of astrophysical observatory, under the direction of the Smithsonian Institution, including salaries of assistants, apparatus, and miscellaneous expenses, $9,000. (The Smithsonian Institution estimates for an increase in this item of $1,000 over the present appropriation. ) Nore.—An astrophysical observatory has been established under the Smithsonian Institution, in part from the Smithsonian fund and in part by subscriptions of private individuals. Researches of great scientific and economic value are carried on by every consid- erable civilized government at well-equipped astrophysical observatories. The investigations here contemplated are not provided for by any other observatory in this country. December 3, 1894—House. Estimates for 1896. For maintenance of astrophysical observatory, under the direction of the Smithsonian Institution, including salaries of assistants, apparatus, and miscellaneous expenses, $10,000. pee OTN FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS, 1893-1895. 1677 Norr.—An astrophysical observatory has been established under the Smithsonian Institution, in part from the Smithsonian fund and in part by subscriptions of private individuals. Researches of great scientific and econmic value are carried on by every consid- erable civilized government at well-equipped astrophysical observatories. The investigations here contemplated are not provided for by any other observatory in this country. ASTROPHYSICAL OBSERVATORY—APPROPRIATIONS. February 3, 1894—House. Mr. JoserH D. Sayers, from Committee on Appropriations, sub- mitted report (H. 348) on H. 5575 (sundry civil bill for 1895), which contained the following item: Astrophysical Observatory: Appropriation for 1894, $9,000; esti- mate for 1895, $9,000; recommended for 1895, $9,000. August 18, 1894. d Sundry civil act for 1895. For maintenance of Astrophysical Observatory, under the direction of the Smithsonian Institution, including salaries of assistants, appa- ratus, and miscellaneous expenses, $9,000. (Stat., XXVIII, 384.) March 2, 1895. Sundry civil act for 1896. For maintenance of Astrophysical Observatory, under the direction of the Smithsonian Institution, including salaries of assistants, appa- ratus, and miscellaneous expenses, $9,000. (Stat., XXVIII, 924.) OBJECTS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION. December 14, 1893. The PRESIDENT: The Smithsonian Institution is organized under the act of Congress approved August 10, 1846." Under this act, the President, the Vice-President, the Chief Justice, the then Bead of Departments, the Commissioner a the Patent Office, the Governor of the District of Columbia, and such other persons as they may elect honorary mem- - bers, are constituted an ‘‘ Establishment,” by the name of the Smith- sonian Institution. The Commissioner of the Patent Office has now an official superior in the Secretary of the Interior, whose name, nev- ertheless, does not appear upon the “Establishment” any more than that of the more recently created office of the Secretary of Agriculture. The members of the Institution may hold stated and special meet- ings for the supervision of its affairs, and the advice and instruction of the Board of Regents, at which the President, and in his absence ‘Revised Statutes, Title LX XIII. 1678 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. the Vice-President, shall preside. Such meetings, which were for- merly held, have of late years been discontinued, the last one having been held at the Smithsonian Institution on May 5, 1877. The by- laws of the Institution provide that the stated meetings are to be held on the first Tuesday of May, annually, and also that special meet- ings will be convened by the direction of the President. The business of the Institution is conducted by a Board of Regents, composed of the Vice-President, the Chief Justice, three members of the Senate, and three members of the House, together with six_per- sons other than members of Congress. The Senators are appointed by the President of the Senate, and members of the House by the Speaker. The six other persons (no two of whom shall be residents of the same State) are appointed by joint resolution of Congress. The Chancellor of the Institution is elected by the Board of Regents. The Secretary of the Institution is also elected by the Board of Regents, and he is at the same time the Secretary of the ‘‘ Establish- ment,” and the Secretary of that board. As the non-Congressional Regents reside in all parts of the Union, the Regents meetings, though regular, are not frequent, and the duty of carrying out their wishes in the interim falls chiefly upon the Secretary. But the board elects three of their own body as an Exec- utive Committee, whose relations to the Secretary are not defined, but with whom, as a matter of fact, he advises on any important mat- ters outside of the established conduct of the Institution. The object of Congress in founding the Smithsonian Institution, as inferable from the prolonged debates which preceded the fixing its constitution, as well as from the language of the act, was, primarily, to open a way for the encouragement of art as well as science without the expenditure of public money. Consistently with this, the policy of the Institution, inaugurated by its first Secretary, Joseph Henry, approved by the Regents, and continued by them through subsequent Secretaries, has been, in the words of its founder, to provide ‘*‘ for the increase and diffusion of knowledge among men.”’ It may be said, consequently, ‘‘to have taken all knowledge to be its province,” looking to increase it by the encouragement of creative art and origi- nal discovery, and to diffuse it by publication and exchange with its body of correspondents in every country. ; It is not, then, a local institution, nor even only a national one, but an‘ international one, reaching out in its operations to every portion of the world. While the Institution’s charter is thus ample, however, it has natu- rally been more occupied in furthering the useful ends which are 1These few important words, which form the spirit of the Institution, appear to have been taken from Washington’s farewell address (‘‘ Promote, as an object of primary importance, institutions for the general diffusion of knowledge’’). it oe oh eee FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS, 1893-1895. 1679 nearest at hand; that is, in first promoting the increase and diffusion of knowledge in these United States. This national work has lain not only in scientific inquiry, but in . stimulating the progress of national art and literature, in initiating and developing interests in all branches of useful knowledge, and in making new and useful discoveries. It diffuses this knowledge by publishing it to the world and by bringing about an interchange of thought between all those engaged in promoting the increase of knowl- edge everywhere—primarily in this country, but also by association _ and correspondence with other countries. It is in this last connection that a great part of its work lies. As an illustration of the extent of this special part of its activities, it may be stated that the Institution now has about 24,000 active correspondents, of whom 14,000 are in Europe, 200 in Africa, 500 in Australasia, and about 9,000 in the various countries of the Western Hemisphere. In the course of this work the Institution has gathered at Washing- ton an immense collection of books, found nowhere else to so great an extent, bearing chiefly upon discovery and invention, which, with others, now occupy nearly 300,000 titles. These are deposited tempo- rarily with the national library at the Capitol. It has also formed a National Museum, with special reference to the illustration of the resources of the continent of North America. The Museum is referred to in the organic act, but Congress has since placed under the charge of the Institution other interests, such as the Bureau of International Exchanges, by means of which Congressional and other Government publications are exchanged with those of all leading foreign governments for the benefit of the nation; and a sys- tem of intercourse, through the just-mentioned correspondents (and otherwise impossible), is kept up between thinkers and inventors of this country with those of the rest of the world. Among other interests placed by Congress under the Institution are the Bureau of Ethnology, the National Zoological Park, and the Astro- physical Observatory. It will be seen from what has just been stated that while a portion of the Institution’s duty, as originally designed by Congress, was the furtherance of national art as well as science, yet it has on the whole leaned more to utilitarian interests in its functions, ‘‘ the increase of knowledge ” directly due to it being represented by such contributions as the labors of Henry, its first Secretary, toward the establishment of the electric telegraph’ and the improvement of our light-house sys- tem (which is so largely due to him), and of its second Secretary, who -was the founder of public fish-culture, which he took from its infancy and extended to such a degree that it now contributes enormously to the food supply of the United States. The Institution’s private fund received from James Smithson was 1680 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. somewhat over $700,000, to which enough has been added since by private gifts to bring the amount up to nearly $1,000,000, on which first million Congress has authorized the Treasury to pay 6 per cent interest. It is to be observed that this high rate of interest is given for purposes which, in fact, have caused it to be reexpended upon national objects, a considerable portion of it having been in the past absorbed in the administration of trusts laid upon it by Congress, and insufficiently appropriated for. This interest on the fund is expended by the Board of Regents, chiefly through the Secretary, with a quar- terly auditing of accounts by the Executive Committee. The future prosperity of the Institution seems to depend much upon the increase of this original fund, which has lately been considerably added to, and which it is believed would be given to still more largely by American citizens if the national character of the Institution and the true nature of the objects pursued by it were better known. There is a widely spread but erroneous impression that its chief function is in making collections in natural history. This misconception is per- haps due to the fact that the well-known castellated building occupied by it, and called by its name, is, owing to the crowded condition of the National Museum, largely used as a repository of natural-history collections, which, it will be understood from what has preceded, are merely incidental to a single side of its multifarious activities, and are not an index of the Institution’s real character. For the President’s personal information. Respectfully submitted. S. P. Lanatry, Secretary. By Tue Cuier JUSTICE. AMENDMENT TO ACT OF ORGANIZATION OF SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION. January 15, 1894—House. Mr. Davin B. Cunperrson introduced bill (E.. 5219): That ‘‘An act to establish the Smithsonian Institution for the increase and diffu- sion of knowledge among men,’’ approved August 10, 1846, Revised Statutes, title 73, be, and the same is hereby, amended in section 5579 of said act, by striking out the words, ‘‘the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of War, the Secretary of the Navy, the Postmaster-General, the Attorney-General, the Com- missioner of the Patent Office, and the governor of the District of Columbia, and such other persons as they may elect honorary members,”’ and inserting the words, ‘‘the heads of the Executive Departments,’’ so that the section will read: ‘Suc. 5579. The President, the Vice-President, the Chief Justice, and the heads’ of the Executive Departments are hereby constituted an establishment by the name of the ‘Smithsonian Institution’ for the increase and diffusion of knowledge among men; and by that name shall be known and have perpetual succession, with the powers, limitations, and restrictions hereinafter contained, and no other.” That section 5591 of the Revised Statutes be amended by the addition of these words: ‘‘ But this shall not operate as a limitation on the power of the Smithsonian FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS, 1893-1895. 1681 Institution to receive money or other property by gift, bequest, or devise, and to hold and dispose of the same in promotion of the purposes thereof, and as provided in the next section.”’ Referred to Committee on the Judiciary. January 17, 1894—Senate. Mr. 8S. M. Cuttom introduced bill (S. 1446) to amend the ‘‘Act to establish the Smithsonian Institution.” Same as H. 5219, January 15, 1894. Referred to Committee on the Judiciary. January 18, 1894—Senate. Mr. J. S. Morrrt introduced bill (8. 1460): That ‘‘An act to establish the Smithsonian Institution for the increase and diffu- sion of knowledge among men,’’ approved August 10, 1846, Revised Statutes, title 73, be, and the same is hereby, amended by striking out section 5579 and inserting in lieu thereof, as follows: ‘Src. 5579. That the President, Vice-President, the ChiefJustice, and the heads of Executive Departments are hereby constituted an establishment by the name of the Smithsonian Institution, for the increase and diffusion of knowledge among men; and by that name shall be known and have perpetual succession, with powers, limitations, and restrictions hereinafter contained, and no other.”’ And that the act aforesaid be further amended by adding to section 5591 as follows: ‘Provided, That this shall not operate as a limitation on the power of the Smith- sonian Institution to receive money or other property by gift, bequest, or devise, and to hold and dispose of the same in promotion of the purposes thereof, and as pro- vided in the next section.”’ Referred to Committee on the Judiciary. January 19, 1894—House. Mr. Stwon P. Wotverton, from Committee on the Judiciary, sub- mitted report (H. 269) on H. 5219: On the 10th day of August, 1846, an act was passed entitled ‘‘An act to establish the Smithsonian Institution for the increase and diffusion of knowledge among men,” in pursuance of the will of James Smith- son, of London, who, by his last will and testament, gave the whole of his property to the United States of America to found at Washington, under the name of the ‘‘ Smithsonian Institution,” an establishment for the increase and diffusion of knowledge among men. By the first section of this act, being section 5579 of the Revised Statutes of the United States, it is provided ‘‘that the President and Vice-President of the United States, the Secretary of State, the Sec- retary of the Treasury, the Secretary of War, the Secretary of the Navy, the Postmaster-General, the Attorney-General, the Chief Jus- tice, the Commissioner of the Patent Office of the United States, and the governor of the city of Washington, during the time for which they shall hold their respective offices, and such other persons as they may elect honorary members, be, and are hereby, constituted an estab- lishment by the rame of the ‘Smithsonian Institution.’” Since the passage of this act two Executive Departments of the Government H. Doe. 732 106 1682 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. have been created, the heads of which being the ‘‘Secretary of the Interior” and the ‘‘ Secretary of Agriculture.” The place filled by the Commissioner of Patents under the act of incorporation should naturally be filled by the Secretary of the Inte- rior, being the head of an Executive Department, and the Secretary of Agriculture should be added as the head of an Executive Department created since the incorporation of the institution. The amendment proposed by this bill is to strike out the words ‘‘the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of War, the Secretary of the Navy, the Postmaster-General, the Attor- ney-General, the Commissioner of the Patent Office, and the governor of the District of Columbia, and such other persons as they may elect honorary members,” and insert in lieu of the words stricken out ‘‘the heads of Executive Departments,” so that section 5579 will read: ‘‘ The President, the Vice-President, the Chief Justice, and the heads of Executive Departments are hereby constituted an establishment by the name of the Smithsonian Institution for the increase and diffusion of knowledge among men, and by that name shall be known and have perpetual succession, with the powers, limitations, and restrictions hereinafter contained, and no other.” As the original act of incorporation named as one of the corporators the governor of the District of Columbia, which office no longer exists, and as there has been created since a court in the District of Colum- bia consisting of one chief justice and two associate justices, to be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, who shall hold office during good behavior, it would seem to be consistent that the evident intention of the framers of the original act of incorporation to name some officer of the District as one of the corporators, your committee recommends that the bill be amended by adding after the words ‘‘ Executive Departments,” in the seventeenth line of section 5579, the words ‘‘and the chief justice of the court of appeals of the District of Columbia,” and to strike out the word ‘*and,” in the same line, after the words ‘‘ Chief Justice,” so that the section will read: Src. 5579. The President, the Vice-President, the Chief Justice, the heads of the Executive Departments, and the chief justice of the court of appeals of the District of Columbia are hereby constituted an establishment by the name of the ‘‘Smith- sonian Institution’”’ for the increase and diffusion of knowledge among men. . Section 5591 of the Revised Statutes is as follows: The Regents are authorized to make such disposal of any other moneys which have accrued or shall hereafter accrue as interest upon the Smithsonian fund, not herein appropriated or not required for the purposes herein provided, as they shall deem best suited for the promotion of the purpose of the testator. The amendment proposed by this bill is for the purpose of avoiding any possible construction of the statute as it now exists restricting FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS, 1893-1895. 16838 the right of the Regents of this Institution from holding property out- side of the million of dollars mentioned in this section. The amend- ment is for the purpose of removing any reasonable doubt as to the power of the Smithsonian Institution to receive money or other prop- erty and hold the same for the promotion of the purposes of its incor- poration. The amendments proposed by this bill are recommended by the Regents of the Institution and have the approval of the Chief Justice. The additional amendment proposed to this bill, to add the name of the chief justice of the court of appeals of the District of Columbia, is suggested by the Chief Justice of the United States [Supreme] Court. The committee therefore recommends the passage of the bill with the amendment suggested. Referred to House Calendar. February 20, 1894—Senate. Mr. O. H. Puarr. I am directed by the Committee on the Judiciary, to whom was referred the bill (S. 1460) to amend an act entitled ‘‘ An act to establish the Smithsonian Institution for the increase and diffu- sion of knowledge among men,” to report it with an amendment and submit a report thereon. This is a measure which ought to be acted on as speedily as may be, but as I have made a written report I shall not ask to have the bill taken up until the report has been printed. I give notice that I shall call the bill up at an early day after the routine business of the morning hour. The Vicr-Presipent (Mr. A. E. Stevenson). Meanwhile the bill will be placed on the Calendar. March 5, 1894—Senate. Mr. O. H. Puarr. I ask the unanimous consent of the Senate to consider at this time the bill (S. 1460) to amend an act entitled ‘‘An act to establish the Smithsonian Institution for the increase and dif- fusion of knowledge among men.” The bill was reported by the Com- mittee on the Judiciary, and I gave notice at the time [ reported it that I should call it up at an early day. I was authorized by the com- mittee to ask for its passage at that time. There being no objection, the Senate, as in Committee of the Whole, proceeded to consider the bill, which had been reported from the Com- mittee on the Judiciary, with an amendment, to strike out all after the enacting clause and insert: That the Revised Statutes, Title LX XIII, being a reenactment of ‘“‘An act to establish the Smithsonian Institution for the increase and diffusion of knowledge among men,’’ approved August 10, 1846, be, and the same is hereby, amended so that section 5579 shall read as follows: “Sec. 5579. That the President, the Vice-President, the Chief Justice, and the heads of Executive Departments are hereby constituted an establishment by the name of the Smithsonian Institution for the increase and diffusion of knowledge 1684 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. among men, and by that name shall be known and have perpetual succession with the powers, limitations, and restrictions hereinafter contained, and no other.”’ And be further amended by striking out of section 5580 the words ‘‘the governor of the District of Columbia.”’ And be further amended by adding to section 5591 as follows: ‘* Provided, That this shall not operate as a limitation on the power of the Smith- sonian Institution to receive money or other property by gift, bequest, or devise, and and to hold and dispose of the same in promotion of the purposes thereof.’’ The amendment was agreed to. Mr. Wiixrinson Catt. I should be glad to hear the Senator from Connecticut explain the changes proposed to be made in the existing law and the purpose of them. Mr. Puatt. The first change is to substitute the ‘‘ Secretary of the Interior ” for the ‘‘ Commissioner of Patents” among the corporators. The law now embraces all the heads of Departments except the Secre- tary of the Interior, and for that Department the Commissioner of Patents is named. It is thought that there should be no distinction between the Departments in that respect. That is all with regard to the first change. The second proposition is to strike out from the present statutes ‘the governor of the District of Columbia.” There is no such officer. The amendment is merely to perfect the law in that respect. The third removes a possible doubt as to whether the Smithsonian Institution is authorized to receive bequests and gifts. That is all there is to the bill. Mr. Cat. I shall make no objection to the passage of the bill, but I should like to suggest for the consideration of the Senate and of the committee from which this bill comes that there ought to be a scientific department of this Government. This great Institution should be under the charge of scientists who are directly connected with the great questions which are submitted to that Institution for examination. It seems to me to be quite an anomaly that the extraordinary bequest of Mr. Smithson, which ought to be capable of so much benefi- cence and of such vast and extended influence should be set aside under the charge of Cabinet officers, never to receive any considera- tion and only to be treated in occasional notices in bills of appro- priation. The bill was reported to the Senate as amended, and the amendment was concurred in. The bill was passed. The title was amended so as to read: ‘‘A bill to amend an act entitled ‘An act to establish the Smithsonian Institution for the increase and diffusion of knowledge among men,’ being Title LXXIII of the Revised Statutes.” FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS, 1893-1895. 1685 March 7, 1894—House. S. 1460 ordered to lie on the table. March 8, 1894—House. The Speaker (Mr. Cuartes F. Crisp) laid before the House the bill (S. 1460). Mr. Smwon P. Wotverton. I ask unanimous consent for the pas- sage of this Senate bill in place of the bill (H. 5219) reported from the House Committee on the Judiciary on the same subject. The Speaker. Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from Pennsylvania ? Mr. Ropert R. Hirr. That bill is identically the same as the House bill, is it not? Mr. Wotverron. Yes. Mr. Hirr. I have no objection. The Spraker. Is there objection to the present consideration of the bill? There was no objection. The bill was passed. H. 5219 ordered to lie on the table. March 12, 1894. Be it enacted, etc., That the Revised Statutes, title 73, being a re-enactment of ‘‘ An act to establish the Smithsonian Institution for the increase and diffusion of knowledge among men,” approved August 10, 1846, be, and the same is hereby, amended so that section 5579 shall read as follows: ‘Sec. 5579. That the President, the Vice-President, the Chief Justice, and the heads of the Executive Departments are hereby con- stituted an establishment by the name of the Smithsonian Institution for the increase and diffusion of knowledge among men, and by that name shall be known and have perpetual succession with the powers, limitations, and restrictions hereinafter contained, and no other.” And be further amended by striking out of section 5580 the words **the governor of the District of Columbia.” And be further amended by adding to section 5591 as follows: ‘* Provided, That this shall not operate as a limitation on the power of the Smithsonian Institution to receive money or other property by gift, bequest, or devise, and to hold and dispose of the same in pro- motion of the purposes thereof.” (Stat., XXVIII, 41.) DEPOSIT OF SECURITIES IN THE TREASURY VAULTS. January 30, 1894. January 30, 1894. Drar Sir: I venture to ask your interest, as a member. of the Smithsonian Institution, in securing the deposit and safe-keeping in the Treasury vaults of certain bonds and securities belonging to the 1686 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. Institution. 1 may add that they are of small bulk, and that it will not be necessary to have such frequent access to them as to give rise to any inconvenience. In view of the fact that the Institution as constituted by law con- sists of the President and the highest officers of Government, it would appear proper that the securities referred to should be placed in a Government depository rather than with some private company. May I ask, therefore, that if not inconsistent with the interests of the Department you will authorize the Treasurer of the United States to receive the securities referred to and deposit them in the Treasury vaults? Iam, sir, your obedient servant, . S. P. Lanetry, Secretary. The SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY. February 1, 1894. TREASURY DEPARTMENT, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY, Washington, D. C., February 1, 1894. My. S. P. Lane ey, Secretary Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. Sir: I have to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 30th ultimo, in which you ask that the Treasurer of the United States be authorized to receive on special deposit certain bonds and securities belonging to the Smithsonian Institution, and to inform you that the letter has this day been referred to the Treasurer with the suggestion that, if he sees no objection thereto, the Institution be allowed to keep the papers mentioned in Vault No. 7 of the Treasurer’s ofhice. Accord- ingly please arrange with the Treasurer for the reception of the securities. Respectfully yours, W. E. Curtis, Acting Secretary. February 2, 1894. TREASURY DEPARTMENT, OFFICE OF THE TREASURER, Washington, D. C., February 2, 1894. Hon. 8. P. Lanewey, Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. Str: I have been authorized by the Secretary of the Treasury to receive and keep on deposit, in Vault No. 7 of the Treasury, certain bonds and securities belonging to the Smithsonian Institution. As the Secretary authorizes the deposit subject to any objection I might make,-I will accept it upon these conditions: I will assume no responsibility in reference to it and it shall be wholly at your risk. The bonds and securities are to be placed ina convenient receptacle and securely. locked, and the key kept in your possession. ewe FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS, 1893-1895. 1687 If you desire any other person than yourself to inspect the bonds at any time, I will require a written request from you to that effect, Respectfully yours, D. N. Morean, Treasurer United States. PERMANENT APPROPRIATIONS—SMITHSONIAN FUND. February 8, 1894—House. Letter from the Secretary of the Treasury (Mr. J. G. Carlisle) relative to permanent specific appropriations [bill (H. 2001), H. Mis. Doe. 86], urged that the laws should not be repealed providing for ‘*nermanent specific appropriations looking to the maintenance of institutions, or the manner of payment of compensation for certain official services, which, if it be the will of Congress to abandon, it were better to repeal the law creating them rather than to subject such institutions or officials to an equivocal existence or support, through the vicissitudes of annual legislation necessary to maintain them.” [Extract. ] Statement of appropriations for permanent specific objects during the fiscal years 1892 and 1893. 1892. 1893. SMU RURO HIAT aL AULEULION sc ccsmm poecceis to cc Sse ate os orisias memece eee beans sees $44, 481.36 | $54, 180.00 AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION. March 5, 1894—Senate. The Vicr-Presipent (Mr. A. E. Stevenson) laid before the Senate a communication from the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, transmitting the annual report of the American Historical Association for the year 1898, in accordance with the act of incorporation. Mr. JoserH R. Hawxey. Is the matter accompanying the report sufficient to make a large document? If so, it ought to be referred to the Committee on Printing. I see the size of the package. Mr. Francis M. Cockretu. Let the communication be printed any- way, with the accompanying papers, and referred to the Committee on Printing. Mr. GrorcE F. Hoar. The usual number? Mr. Hawiry. Theusualnumber. Let them be printed and referred. The Vicr-PREsIDENT. The communication, with the accompanying papers, will be referred to the Committee on Printing and ordered to be printed. 1688 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. OWEN STATUE. March 14, 1894—House. Mr. ArtHuR H. Taytor, of Indiana, introduced bill (H. 6289) for the erection of a statue of the late Robert Dale Owen to be placed in the grounds of the Smithsonian Institution. Referred to Committee on the Library. January 17, 1895—Senate. Mr. D. W. VoorHess introduced bill (S. 2600): Whereas Robert Dale Owen, then a Representative in Congress from the State of Indiana, on the 19th of December, 1845, introduced in the Twenty-ninth Congress a bill ‘‘to establish the Smithsonian Institution for the increase and diffusion of knowl- edge among men,’’ and in the face of strong opposition secured its substantial enactment April 29, 1846; and Whereas he was appointed chairman of the first Board of Regents? of said Institu- tion and devoted many years of his life to its organization and success: Therefore, Be it enacted, etc., That the sum of $20,000, or so much thereof as may be necessary, be, and the same is hereby, appropriated, to be paid out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the erection on the grounds of the Smithsonian Institution, in the city of Washington, District of Columbia, ‘under the direction of the Regents of the said Smithsonian Institution, astatue of the late Robert Dale Owen: Provided, however, That the expenditure of said money shall be made under and by direction of the Secretary of the Treasury; the sculptor to be designated by a com- mission consisting of the chairman of the Joint Committee on the Library of Con- gress, the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, and a representative chosen by the surviving members of the family of Robert Dale Owen; and said commission shall be governed in the choice of a sculptor by the merits of the models which may be submitted for their inspection. Referred to Committee on the Library. OBJECTS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION. March 19, 1894. In answer to numerous inquiries the following supplementary cir- cular, descriptive of the general character and work of the Institu- tion, and making mention of the Hodgkins fund, was prepared and translated into French and German, and through the courtesy of the Department of State a number of copies were sent to several of the American embassies in Europe for their general use, in answering questions concerning the Smithsonian Institution: SmirHsONIAN Institution, Washington, , 189—. Sir: In answer to your inquiry I am authorized to furnish the following informa- tion: The Smithsonian Institution was originally constituted by an act of the National Legislature, to administer a bequest made to the Government of the United States in the early years of the present century. The purpose of the bequest was declared to be ‘‘the increase and diffusion of knowledge among men,”’ and its acceptance by 1Chairman of the Executive Committee not of the Board. FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS, 1893-1895. 1689 the nation is the only instance of such an action in its history. The Institution, then, occupies a peculiar relation to the Government. It is composed as follows: MEMBERS OF THE INSTITUTION. Presiding officer (ex officio): The President of the United States. Chancellor: The Chief Justice of the United States. The Vice-President of the United States. The Secretary of State. The Secretary of the Treasury. The Secretary of War. The Secretary of the Navy. The Postmaster-General. The Attorney-General. The Secretary of the Interior. The Secretary of Agriculture. The high functionaries above-mentioned are its members ex officio, with the exception of the chancellor, who is elected. The law also creates a secretary of the above body, whom it calls ‘‘the Secretary of the Institution.” ADMINISTRATION. The law further directs that the business of the Institution shall be managed by a Board of Regents, composed of the Vice-President and the Chief Justice of the United States, three Senators, three members of the House of Representatives, and six other eminent persons nominated by a joint resolution of the Senate and the House of Representatives. The Secretary of the Institution is also the Secretary of the Board of Regents and their principal executive officer. His duties in this regard are analogous to those of a director. All correspondence should be addressed to him. It will be observed that the immediate and primary object of the Smithsonian Institution, as above constituted, is to administer a certain fund, of which the United States has accepted the custody, for the especial purpose of ‘‘ the increase and dif- fusion of knowledge among men,”’ so that its purpose in its most general sense is not limited to the people of the United States of America, but extends to all mankind. This has been interpreted as indicating such a direction of the activities of the Insti- tution as shall result— (1) In the increase of knowledge by original investigation and study, either in science or literature. . (2) In the diffusion of this knowledge by publication, not only through the United States, but everywhere, and especially by promoting an interchange of thought among those prominent in learning among all nations, through its correspondents. These embrace institutions or societies conspicuous in art, science, or literature throughout the world. Its publications are in three principal issues, namely, the Contributions to Knowl- edge, the Miscellaneous Collections, and the Annual Report. Numerous works are published annually by it under one of these forms and distributed to its principal correspondents, while there is also published, at the expense of the Government, an edition of the Report of the Board of Regents, containing an account of the operations of the Institution during each year, which is distributed throughout the country by the Congress. The Institution has been authorized by law to deposit its original fund in the Treasury of the United States, and it has further been authorized to accept certain special bequests made by individuals, where these have been such as to promote its general purpose, ‘‘ the increase and diffusion of knowledge among men.’’ Thus, for 1690 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. example, the Institution has accepted and administered a fund which, under the name of the donor, is called ‘‘the Hodgkins fund,”’ and which is given for the especial purpose of ‘‘the increase and diffusion of more exact knowledge in regard to the nature and properties of atmospheric air in connection with the welfare of man.’’ This fund is also deposited in the Treasury of the United States. Other dona- tions have been received and are administered for other specific purposes. The seat of the Institution is at Washington, but its activities reach throughout the world in various ways, and principally through the system of correspondence already referred to. The present number of correspondents is about 24,000, and by means of this system the Institution not only gives, but receives, communications from men of learning in all countries. In this and other ways it has gathered at Washington a special library of books bearing upon the history of arts, sciences, discoveries, and inventions. The library now includes 300,000 titles, the greater proportion of which is, by permission of Congress, deposited in the same building and accessible with the National Library. Besides the above activities, which are carried on with the special fund already referred to, of which the nation has consented to act as the guardian, there are cer- tain bureaus or divisions of the Government which the Legislature has placed in its especial charge, and for the cost of which Congress has, at different times, made special appropriations. In this way it has placed under the charge of the Institution the United States National Museum, the Bureau of International Exchanges, the Bureau of Ethnology, the National Zoological Park, and the Astrophysical Observa- tory. These also are administered by the Secretary, under the direction of the Board of Regents. The present Secretary of the Institution is 8. P. Langley, to whom all communications should be addressed, at Washington. NATIONAL ZOOLOGICAL PARK—ENTRANCE TO PARK. April 30, 1894—Senate. Mr. Witi1am M. Stewart proposed an amendment to sundry civil bill for 1895 (H. 5575): For improving the Adams Mill road for a driveway into the Zoological Park from the entrance thereof, $15,000. Referred to Committee on Appropriations. June 22, 1894—Senate. Mr. I. G. Harris reported favorably amendment proposed by Mr. William -M. Stewart to District of Columbia bill for 1895 (H. 5481): * * * * * * * For grading and macadamizing the Adams Mill road from Columbia road to the Zoological Park, $3,000. August 7, 1894. District of Columbia act for 1895. For opening entrance into Zoological Park, from Woodley Lane road, and opening driveway into Zoological Park, from said entrance along the west bank of Rock Creek, $2,500, to be paid wholly from the revenues of the District of Columbia. (Stat., XXVIII, 251.) FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS, 1893-1895. 1691 January 10, 1895—House. Letter from the Acting Secretary of the Treasury. TREASURY DEPARTMENT, January 9, 1895. Str: I have the honor to transmit herewith, for the consideration of Congress, an estimate of appropriation submitted by the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, under date of the 7th instant, for the construction of a road from the Holt Mansion entrance, on Adams Mill road, into the National Zoological Park, to connect with the roads now in existence, including a bridge across Rock Creek, $15,000. Respectfully, yours, C. S. Hamuin, Acting Secretary. The SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, Washington, D. C., January 7, 1895. Srr: I have the honor to forward herewith an estimate for the sum of $15,000, for the construction of a road in the National Zoological Park. It is desired that, if possible, this estimate be inserted in the **Act making appropriations for sundry civil expenses of the Govern- ment for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1896, and for other purposes.” I have the honor to be, sir, with great respect, your obedient servant, S. P. Lanetzy, Secretary. The SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY. National Zoological Park: For the construction of a road from the Holt Mansion entrance (on Adams Mill road) into the park, to connect with the roads now in exist- ence, including a bridge across Rock Creek, $15,000. Referred to Committee on Appropriations. February 25, 1895—Senate. Mr. I. G. Harris. On page 40 [of the sundry civil bill], after the legis- lation in respect to the Zoological Park, I move to insert, after line 21: For continuing the entrance into the Zoological Park from Woodley Lane and opening driveway into the Zoological Park from said entrance along the west bank of Rock Creek, $5,000, to be immediately available, which sum is hereby appro- priated out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, one-half chargeable to the revenues of the District of Columbia. I merely desire to state that the owners of the real estate have dedi- cated the land free of cost. The roadway is partially constructed and it requires, as I am informed by the District Commissioners, this appropriation to complete it. Agreed to. March 2, 1895. Sundry civil act for 1896. For continuing the entrance into the Zoological Park from Woodley Lane, and opening driveway into Zoological Park from said entrance 1692 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. along the west bank of Rock Creek, $5,000, to be immediately available, which sum is hereby appropriated out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, one-half chargeable to the revenues of the District of Columbia. (Stat., XXVIII, 924.) NATIONAL ZOOLOGICAL PARK—REPORT OF EXPENSES. August 18, 1894. The sundry civil act for 1895 provided that ‘‘ hereafter a report in detail of the expenses on account of the National Zoological name shall be made to Congress at the beginning of each regular session.’ (Stat., XXVIII, 384.) NATIONAL ZOOLOGICAL PARK—ESTIMATES. December 4, 1893—House. Estimates for 1895. For continuing the construction of roads, walks, bridges, water-sup- ply, sewerage, and drainage, and for grading, planting, and otherwise improving the grounds; for erecting and repairing buildings and inclo- sures; and for care, subsistence, transportation, and purchase of ani- mals, including salaries or compensation of all necessary employees, and general incidental expenses not otherwise provided for, $50,000. (The Smithsonian Institution estimates for an increase in this item of $25,000 over the present appropriation.) February 8, 1894—House. Deficiency estimates for 1894. For repairs to the Holt mansion to make the same suitable for occu- pancy, and for office furniture: To pay Devereux & Gaghan, plumbing and gas fitting ...-...--.---------- $320. 47 ‘To pay Jule Banseoreh, Chairs... io. ccawcetae ns == 505 = 5e es neem eee 14. 00 owpay. Bar bends itor, erates | lo Jsos occ. ab k ue Seetpaee Jee cee 46. 00 Togay.Geonge Breipoarth, chairs. 2. 2:0 sas28 slr dasicon- Seles tee ae eee 25. 75 ‘To pay AS Eberly pibens, stoves uae sed vere: te oat os enema 20. 35 426. 57 Norr.—When the above liabilities were incurred it was supposed that they could be properly paid from the item for “‘ miscellaneous expenditures.”” The property has been actually in use in the public service for two years past. To reimburse the Smithsonian fund for assuming expenses of labor and materials for repairs urgently necessary for the preservation of the Holt mansion, including the following: C. Burlew, concreting and pitching... 5. .-osaase-nab> -> = -n2 eee nee ene $60. 48 Belt & Dyer doorsand moldings: 1): o2seaeaeee == - << - cee - eeeee 37.11 EH: CO Mounielathing and plastering 02.) ci 02992002 2k USE ee eee 173. 64 C, -W: (Dawes; compentry =~ 5-2-1 nS - cle

. cccus sc accns senuereeeee nana tse ce eee ames 12, 948 14, 4382 . FIFTY-FOURTH CONGRESS, 1895-1897. 1716 Department. 1894. 1895. SUE Beat necitceenbhBonsdicirnit Ss ASS BAS ie Se eS 8 Seis doc oc pean ee 73, 325 78, 824 Birds’ eggs and nests........ ister aedsica cence stints cine aicadaeeaksecmesw escort teswcnene 58, 041 60, 064 EERIE AEG De UA GUIBEIN ete oe cco an annie an a aim weno baehine ot tae teins woe teen 34,215 35, 308 URIS ETL Se SAS a te ae BR BE Si dE ep ne ae SL i fen) eS To 8 na AP BS 125,000 | 131,000 SID eRe UU) oe Se SRE BOOSIE TOE ESS OO SE CEGBOCED ISS° BHCE Osea eae 1,595 1, 660 PMMA ne ludine Cenozoic: fossils)) 522 soos - sess ss seca cence niece cee seocincscee+ 510, 256 524, 388 LE 5 DV ooo Se S Rob SSG Sd cd 2 BOS Regt ge » COQ DE BEL HOE DOLE DOSE EO BE Ey De nogeoc eho eos 610, 000 623, 000 Ro DEME EL CULECULMLCK sean tana oie a Senten ae essa ees ons emesest sotee eee aera ce beens 520, 000 522,378 Pee ELH OIC COMECHOM: salaiteh Jew oe ae dec emis orem eine Reinccese ies eccae es ccricdcsh|eet-neciee ne 106 Comparative anatomy: ee bak aaa | eR Ip PILE tle via Sry § See oe ee oe a 2s EE eae ene ee ee ee ee 95, 631 RODS TIATED PSUS) SE Se ae aS Ce Pe ee a ne ee 89, 493 305, 451 DP UDHIDTBUDEST "0S “SoS SSos SQ Ree B See DB Ge PS) Ope es ate Bene EE DASE ee ane a antes aera 118, 685 ECP IME TIP IN Se ec oc cree wcicttnc ofc cost ee ces Se ce cl cae eee seca cee odes ceeeacieseues 252, 111 269, 008 NOS TERING p53 Ae Set 28 ee See ae Se eae A aa es REPT Ree Sn tye ee b 25, 431 26, 484 Geology cee e eee e ec ee etree eee reece eee n eee e ence ewer ence eect ener eneceeecenaceencrens 063, 606 66, 846 Hiteii ny eee ey ae meLe eee Pipe ye Eas TIS A Oe A ee ee ey 3,279,581 | 3, 406, 920 aNo estimate of the number of specimens in the duplicate series can be given at this time. bIn addition there is a large quantity of material in storage. cThese figures include the duplicates, which are estimated at 12,000. The intrinsic value of such collections as these can not well be expressed in figures. There are single specimens worth hundreds, others worth thousands, of dollars, and still others which are unique and priceless. Many series of specimens which owe their value to their completeness and to the labor which has been expended on them can not be replaced at any price. The collections at a forced sale would realize more than has been expended on them, and a fair appraisal of their value would amount to several millions of dollars. In the direct purchase of specimens but little money has been spent, less, perhaps, in fifty years than either France, England, Germany, or Austria expends in a single year on similar objects. The entire Museum is the outgrowth of Government expeditions and expositions, and of the gifts prompted by the generosity of the American people. = If there were more space it would be possible to devote a special hall to the collections illustrating the life of the races of the far North— the Eskimos and their kin. A large hall might be filled with the wonderful groups of models of the races of mankind, and particularly of the different tribes of the North American Indians, clothed in their characteristic-costumes and engaged in the arts and occupations pecu- liar to each. These groups are recognized in Europe as having no equal, and are now temporarily placed in the lecture room and in vari- ous out-of-the-way corners, where their effect and usefulness are largely lost. No other museum in the world has such rich material in this field, but at present only a small number of exhibition cases can be “2716 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. devoted to them, and the remainder of the material is stowed away in drawers and packing boxes. 7 The magnificent mounted groups of the larger animals of America, unsurpassed by anything of the kind in the world, are now so crowded together in the midst of other collections that they are scarcely visible, | and some of which are packed away. A considerable portion of the collection of the great fossil vertebrate animals of North America, of which there is a magnificent series, is now stored in the basement of the museum at Yale College for lack of room to receive it here, although it is much needed by the geologists of the Geological Survey for purposes of study. Another hall is needed which might well be devoted to economic geology, illustrating the wonderful material wealth of our country and its utilization; and still another is needed “to illustrate the material resources of the country, classified by States. With the present accom- modations the materials and ores of each State are confined to one or two small cases. A hall of proper extent, arranged upon this geo- graphical plan, would be one of the most impressive displays of the kind to be seen anywhere in the world. The building devoted especially to the Museum was erected after the Centennial Exhibition in Philadelphia, as a temporary accommodation for the collections given to the United States by the foreign govern- ments and private exhibitors represented on that occasion. It is the cheapest public building of a permanent character ever erected, having cost only $2.25 a square foot of floor space available for exhibition. | The museum buildings in Central Park, New York, have cost from $30 to $40 a square foot. The building in Washington has served a good purpose, but is defi. cient in one of the most important particulars; it has no cellars what- ever, and very little provision for workshops and laboratories. In consequence of this it has been necessary to use all kinds of devices for storing material which can not be exhibited in the exhibition halls in the bases under the-exhibition cases, in small recesses, so ingeniously contrived that their presence is not suspected. It has been necessary to do this, but the result has been to still further increase the crowded condition. Another disagreeable result is that much noisy work has to be done in the Museum halls in spaces shut off from the public by screens, and that when preparations for exhibitions or unpacking are*going on, not only are a portion of the collections closed to the public, but there isa constant and unpleasant noise of hammers. A temporary relief was secured some years ago by placing the great herbarium, one of the most important collections of American plants in the world, in the custody of the Agricultural Department; but last year the Secretary of Agriculture found himself unable to longer give / FIFTY-FOURTH CONGRESS, 1895-1897. Lay these collections houseroom; and since the building in which they were kept is not fireproof, and the destruction of the collection would be an incalculable loss to science, there was nothing to do but to receive this, and up to the present time a considerable portion of the collection still remains in danger of destruction by fire, at the Department of Agriculture. There is also a large amount of other material which ought to be arranged for public exhibition in a fireproof building which is now in the inflammable wooden structure adjoining the Department of Agri- culture, and which the Secretary is desirous of transferring if accom- modation can be found for it. All the collections of the Geological Survey are stored in this build- ing, and a considerable number of the scientific experts employed by the Survey have office room and accommodations to enable them to study in the Museum building. These accommodations have become absolutely inadequate, and there is no more room to receive the collec- tions which the Director of the Survey deems absolutely necessary to have here in Washington in connection with his investigations of the material wealth of the country. The crowded condition of the exhibition halls has been dwelt upon, but that of the storage rooms is still more congested. In the base- ment of the old Smithsonian building, in its towers, and in various small rooms about the new building, there is a space equivalent to per- haps 200,000 cubic feet, crowded to its utmost capacity with boxed material. This material is all carefully recorded, and the location and contents of every box is definitely fixed, so that when necessary any desired object can be referred to; but satisfactory use of the collec- tions is impossible. In one basement room, for instance, are crowded 50,000 skins of birds, and 50,000 in an adjacent gallery, altogether twelve times as many as are shown in the exhibition hall. So closely are they crowded that it is impossible even to rearrange them, and their study is attended with great difficulty. It is desired to separate from among these the duplicates for distribution to the colleges and schools throughout the country, and an attempt has been made to accomplish this, but it has been found practically impossible. The great collection of alcoholic fishes (the result in part of the explorations of the Fish Commission), the most extensive in America and one of the most extensive in the world, is stored in two basement rooms and only accessible with the greatest difficulty. Furthermore, the crowding of such a mass of alcoholic material in a small space is very dangerous, and in case of fire would lead to disastrous results. Properly equipped museums, like the British Museum in London, have a special fireproof building for collections of this kind, separate from other buildings, and provided with special devices for the prevention of fire. 1718 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. In addition to the storage within the fireproof buildings there are a number of sheds whose capacity is roughly estimated at 170,000 cubic feet; which are packed with valuable material, and in which most of the workshops are placed. Two of these are immediately south of the - Smithsonian building, another at the southeast corner of the Museum building, two others to the southwest of the old Armory building, and another, temporarily hired, halfway between the Museum and the Capi- tol. Until 1888 two floors of the old Armory building were used for the storage of Museum material. It then became necessary to give up one floor to accommodate the increasing necessities of the Fish Commission, and in 1894 to give it up entirely to the Commission. At that time an appropriation was made to rent storage rooms in the city. Suitable storage rooms can not be rented; we have had to move twice and are now being forced to a third move. These moves are destruc- tive and expensive. The two sheds adjoining the Armory building are getting old and some of the timbers are rotting away. They can not be repaired because there is no place to put the material they contain while the work is being done, and they are so crowded that temporary readjustments for this purpose are not possible. All of the wooden storage sheds are in constant danger from destruc- tion by fire. This isa matter especially serious in connection with two long sheds near the Smithsonian building. In his report to the Regents, presented to Congress in 1894, Secretary Langley made an earnest appeal for relief in the following words: I have the assurance of experts that a fire communicated to these rooms would. sweep through the entire length of the building, and although the building itself is fireproof as against any ordinary danger, it may well be doubted whether any of the collections therein exhibited can be regarded as safe if the rooms immediately below should be exposed to so peculiarly severe a conflagration as would be caused by the ignition of these large quantities of inflammable material. Besides this, these wooden sheds, which (as I have already intimated) are used not only for storerooms, © but for workshops, for the preservation of specimens, and also as sheds for the car- penters, are likewise liable to cause serious losses should a fire be kindled in any of them, and all of these, I repeat, are immediately under the windows of the Smith- sonian building. In a report recently submitted by one of the inspectors of the Association of Fire Underwriters, in response to a request from me for a statement as to what insurance rates would be fixed upon the sheds in question, the Smithsonian building is referred to as an undesirable risk, owing solely to the presence of all this inflammable mate- rial underneath and in the adjoining sheds, on which latter insurance can not be placed for less than $40 per $1,000. This is, Iam informed, nearly ten times the rate which would be charged on an ordinary warehouse. The chief danger, how- ever, is not to the sheds themselves or their contents, but to the adjoining collec- tions, which, without reference to their scientific interest but merely to their intrinsic value, represent a very large sum of money. The result of all this crowding and lack of facility for work is that what is accomplished for public education by the Museum requires oy a a Aas 242 ES oy TA ee FIFTY-FOURTH CONGRESS, 1895-1897. 1719 unnecessary and unusual effort, and that the fullest results are not realized from the appropriations which are made for this branch of the (OUTS | i Another result is that the value of the collections, the property of the nation, is not increasing as rapidly as it would otherwise do. The amount of valuable material presented and bequeathed to the Museum is not as great as it seemed likely to be a few years ago. Nothing which is offered is refused, but the authorities of the Museum do not feel at liberty to ask for gifts when they can not assure the givers that they can be suitably cared for; and persons having collections to give, being aware of the lack of room, naturally prefer to place their gifts in institutions where there is room to receive them. Notwithstanding these hindrances to the Museum’s progress, the increment from legitimate sources, especially from the various Depart- ments of the Government, which are required by law to deposit their accumulations here, was during the year 1895 about 127,000 specimens. In 1894 the accéssions were more numerous, the total exceeding 171,000. This large increase was in part at least due to the fact that a large number of collections were acquired at the close of the World’s Fair in Chicago. These were almost without exception collections which had been prepared by foreign exhibitors with the Smithsonian Institution in mind as the ultimate place of deposit. It would have been possible to have obtained an immense number of specimens on this occasion, but it was deemed proper to refrain from efforts in this direction, not only because of the considerations just referred to, but also on account of the desire of the people of Chicago to retain such objects in their own city as a beginning toward a great civic museum which might serve as a permanent memorial of the World’s Columbian Exposition. It has always been the policy of the Smithsonian Institution to encourage the development of such institutions throughout the United States, and to assist in developing them, and on this account many proffers of specimens were declined, with the recommendation that they be offered to the Chicago museum, and, so far as it was possible to do so, the attention of exhibitors who had collections to dispose of was directed toward that institution. A census of the number of specimens now contained in the various ’ departments of the Museum shows that the total is about 3, 500,000, almost all of which have been acquired by gift, in exchange for other specimens, or as an equivalent for publications. 1720 CONGRESSIONAL PROCEEDINGS. The following statement shows the number of specimens received during the years 1893-94 and 1894-95: Department. 1893-94. | 1894-95. Arts and industries: TOXtiles) 2.2252 ccc snecascecle tc ceed saa eccee Se adeseeatet cen cmncaesee te Te renters 18 a Aniimial products: o22e5. 3. Sh SSR LEE Sess Seek eee ne eee Ee eee oo aN erate Graphic arte! £$75 48253. <4 ieee es ae cet ee eee Sone 270 70 FOLeSUnY fa5 25 et = pea win ose eae sae eed wet aos eee eae ee eee nee oe 1 23 Transportavion/ and enomeenNegn. ns. hse e a Seaanas oo nsec ee eee eee Eee 19 6 Naval architectare 22: a3s2 oe cee 2a nee oe ee ee ces tee eee eens 202))| 223222. Historical collections:: . sess 3a 3 4b ores ag Se Bee sek wat on eee 608 298 Musical instruments .......--. oR SORE oe 3 OR AR aL EES STE SUC cm orci: 138 81 Modern pottery, porcelain, bronzes, etc.......... Fe Uehaw nis aac ee ene oer eae 39 14 PRYSICHIPaPpPATAUG 2220 foes o oases Fee ne hee eee eres nee Meee retadee 25) | S#ise ee Homesti¢ Animalsss:b 2. 265225 jone 223s) hese ees ~ asain cae ee s Shave copper 28 41 PE NWOLOR Vise te aistys sede sok ons ab - ba cee eisnesscemen = Scab ybions apo cee ace melee 5, 088 2,642 American: abonginel poulery -t. 5 = 252... + ssaece nea cnanacseneeeneas cages endoe eeeameeine 99 7D Oriential antiquities and religious ceremonials...............- 20-22 -eee eens cece neeene 200 171 PrehistoriG anthropolopy.c: f:. cscs sege tet ce wee e eee « eteecese ees cee eee 13,242 | 50,096 Mamnials(Skins ang glCOnOliGS) fe Se ios cca anes es ahem acer see ane Oana 2,744 1, 484 Ty ie Se See 8 Soe SR SeG ASE cle ope sea Esraceeta rate Rss sawieriosccaée cacsecs 4,367 5, 499 Birds ieess ANG NesIs.s ss enss a> oe ene ae Coe aan esc eae setae aaa eae t = eee 4,133 2,023 Repiiledand) batrachinvs; = 2-2-0 2 sheer ten ancinde neem a acted eee ae aise ee aes =a eee 894} 1,093 TON Pere Se oe oo SAE A Say SS Re SESE Seep acr Seca sdsed Sen Scer smectioscsis ne 6, 200 6,000 Mollusks' (including Cenozoic tossils) <7. 0c. scecccee senen can ccm cadences enamels se een gamer 21,931 | 14,132 THSCCtIS . d.<.cedeeesewucdscecedes chee Vcere adeeb tence me Cea bees Res ct tet = eeac eee be iiemae 11, 800 13, 000 Marine invertebrates. .........-......-- Ga Samoa = Sake Jaa vee pase wae aes eae 3, 684 2,378 elmintnolorical Comeenon . . oo <6 ake sw eens ketene wanes emake oes cce sce <6 smiece ase tae eee 106 Comparative anatomy: MEIN WIA kee cee ee cee oO oe eee aaa IS DOLE She Eee eae Rea: See ips y, RRS Eek Sees sal: . aS ae sade eee retell. oheas ontee