■■'■ ■^*':- m-. ;«?;?■,. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from University of British Columbia Library http://www.archive.org/details/somesalientpoiOOdaws SOME SALIENT POINTS SCIENCE OF THE EARTH BY SIR J. WILLIAM DAWSON C.M.G., LL.D., F.R.S., F.G.S., ETC. WITH FORTY-SIX ILLUSTRATIONS Montreal W. DRYSDALE AND CO. 232, ST. JAMES STREET .Mucccxciii WORKS BY THE SAME AUTHOR. Modern Science in Bible Lands. With Illus- trations. Popular Edition, Revised. Crown 8vo, 6/- The Origin of the World, according to Revela- tion and Science. Sixth Edition. Crown 8vo, cloth, 7/6. The Story of the Earth and Man. Tenth Edition, with Twenty Illustrations. Crown Svo, cloth, 7/6. Fossil Men and Their Modern Representa- tives. .\n atteniiit to illustrate the Characters and Con- dition of Pre-historic Men in Europe, by those of the American Races. With numerous Illustrations. Third Edition. Crown Svo, cloth, 7/6. LONDON : HODDER AND STOUGHTON. PREFACE. 'T^HE present work contains much that is new, and much in correction and ampHfication of that which is old ; and is intended as a closing deliverance on some of the more important questions of geology, on the part of a veteran worker, conversant in his younger days with those giants of the last generation, who, in the heroic age of geological science, piled up the mountains on which it is now the privilege of their successors to stand. J. W. D. Montreal, 1893. CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. PACE The Starting-Poini 3 CHAPTER n. World-Making 9 CHAPTER HI. The Imperfection' of the Geological Record • • • 39 CHAPTER IV. The History of the North Atlantic 57 CHAPTER V. The Dawn of Life 95 CHAPTER VL What may be Learned from Eozoon 135 CHAPTER VII. The Apparition and Succession of Animal Forms . . 169 CHAPTER VHI. The Genesis and Migrations of Plants .... 201 CHAPTER IX. The Growth of Coai 233 vm CONTENTS. CHAPTER X. 'A-.t The Oldest Aik-bre.viiiers 257 CHAPTER XI. Markings, Footprints, and Eucoids 311 CHAPTER XH. Pre-determination in Nature 329 CHAPTER XHI. The Great Ice Ace 345 CHAPTER XIV. Causes of Climatal Change 383 CHAPTER XV, The Distkiuution ov Animals and Plants as Related to Geographical and Geological Changes . . . 401 CHAPTER X\ I. Alpine AND Arctic Plants in Connection with Geological History 425 CHAPTER XVII. Early Man 459 CHAI'IKR XVIII. Man in Nature 481 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. Cape Trinity on the Saguenay Folding of the Earth's Crust . Cambro-Sihirian Sponges Map of the North Atlantic Nature-print of Eozoon . Laurentian Hills, Lower St. Lawrence Section from Petite Nation Seigniory to St. Jerome The Laurentian Nucleus of the American Continent Attitude of Limestone at St. Pierre Weathered Eozoon and Canals Group of Canals in Eozoon Amoeba and Actinophrys Minute Foraminiferal Forms , Section of a Nummulite Portion of Shell of Calcarina Weathered Eozoon with Oscular tubes Diagram showing different States of Fossilization Tubulate Coral ...... Slice of Crystalline Lower Silurian Limestone Walls of Eozoon penetrated with Canals Joint of a Crinoid ..... Shell from a Silurian Limestone, Wales . Casts of Canals of Eozoon in Serpentine Canals of Eozoon . Primordial Trilobites Primitive Fishes Devonian Forest . Coal Section in Nova Scotia . of I'AGE Frontispiece To face 9 39 57 95 100 lOI 103 109 112 "3 "5 119 123 127 128 135 To face To fac Cell of To face 139 141 141 145 146 147 147 169 185 201 233 ILLUSTRATIONS. Skeleton of Hylonomus Lyelli Footprints of Hylopits Logani Humerus and Jaws of Dendrerpeioji Replilifeious Tree . Microsaurian, restored Dolkhosoma longissiinian, restored Pupa and Coniihis . Millipedes and Insect Footprints of Limiiliis Ritsichniles Grenvillensis Restoration of Protospongia ietrauema Giant Net-sponge ..... Boulder Beach, Little Metis . Palaeography of North .\merica Distribution of Animals in Time Tuckerman's Ravine and Mount Washington Pre-historic Skulls ..... Primitive .Sculpture . ' . 7;-> PAGE 261 277 279 287 289 295 329 337 343 383 401 425 459 481 TABLE OF GEOLOGICAL HISTORY. Non-geological readers will find in the following table a condensed explanation of the more important technical terms used in the following pages. The order is from older to newer. GREATER SYSTEMS OF PERIODS. FORMATIONS. characteristic fossils. i Arch.«an or Eozoic Pre-Laurentian Laurentian Protozoa Protophyta PAi,.4i:ozoic Huronian Cambrian Cambro- Silurian* Silurianf Devonian Carboniferous Permian Crustaceans Alga.> Molluscs Cryptogamous Worms and Corals, etc. Gymnospermous Fishes Plants. Amphibians Mesozoic Triassic Jurassic Cretaceous C Reptiles Pines and i Birds Cycads [Earliest Mammals. Trees of modern types. Kainozoic or Tertiary Eocene Miocene Pliocene Pleistocene Modern Higher Mammals of extinct forms Recent Mammals Modern Plants. and Man. Ordovician of Lapworth. f Salopian of Lapworth. ERRATA IN LIST AND LEGENDS OF ILLUSTRATIONS, ETC. Owing to an illness while the work was in press, the author was unable to revise proofs of the Legends of the Illustrations ; hence the following errata. List of Illustrations. Page ix, for "Tabulate" read " Trzbulate." Page X, for ' ' Palaeography "* read ' ' Pateo^^ography. " Cambro-silitrian Sponges, page 39. For " Lanotkrix " read " Lasiothrix." ,, " Palasosaa'us " read " PalKosamis." Sped tn en cf Eozoon, page 135. For " Genera " read " Genera/." Diagram of Coral, page 139. For " T?/bulate" read " Tabulate." Primitive Fishes, page 185. For " Pterichth?/s " read " Pterichthrs." Pupa and Conulus, page 289. For " Darwin" read " Dawson." ,, " prisca "read " priscus." In note for figured " above " read figured " here." Carboniferous Millipedes, page 295. For " Darwin " read " Dawson." Footprints of Limulus, page 311. For " Protfchnites " read " Prot/chnites." Restoration of Protospongia, page 329. For " Giluru-" read " Siluro-." Maps of North America, page 383. For " surmergence" read "submergence." Distribution of Animals, page 401. After ' ' Cuttlefishes " insert " 6. Brachiopods. " Page 485, line 10 from bottom, for " physical" read " psychical.' THE STARTING-POINT. DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF PROF, ROBERT JAMESON, Of the University of Edinburgh, my first Teacher in Geology, WHOSE Lectures I attended, and whose kind Advice and Guidance I enjoyed, in the Winter of 1840-1841. S. E. Hkadlands and Spurs— Popular Papers on Leading Topics — Revisitinc Old Localities — Dedications — General Scope oe thi; Work CHAPTER I. THE STARTING-POINT. AN explorer trudging along some line of coast, or traversing some mountain region, may now and then reach a pro- jecting headland, or bold mountain spur, which may enable him to command a wide view of shore and sea, or of hill and valley, before and behind. On such a salient point he may sit down, note-book and glass in hand, and endeavour to cor- relate the observations made on the ground he has traversed, and may strain his eyes forward in order to anticipate the features of the track in advance. Such are the salient points in a scientific pilgrimage of more than half a century, to which I desire to invite the attention of the readers of these papers. In doing so, I do not propose to refer, except incidentally, to subjects which I have already discussed in books accessible to general readers, but rather to those which are imbedded in little accessible transactions, or scientific periodicals, or which have fallen out of print. I cannot therefore pretend to i)lace the reader on all the salient points of geological science, or even on all of those I have myself reached, but merely to lead him to some of the viewing-places which I have found particu- larly instructive to myself. For similar reasons it is inevitable that a certain personal element shall enter into these reminiscences, though this auto- biograi)hical feature will be kept as much in the background as possible. It is also to be anticipated that the same subject THE STARTING-POINT may appear more than once, but from different points of view, since it is often useful to contemplate certain features of the landscape from more than one place of observation. To drop the figure, the reader will find in these papers, in a plain and popular form, yet it is hoped not in a superficial manner, some of the more important conclusions of a geo- logical worker of the old school, who, while necessarily giving attention to certain specialties, has endeavoured to take a broad and comprehensive view of the making of the world in all its aspects. The papers are of various dates ; but in revising them for publication I have endeavoured, without materially changing their original form, to bring them up to the present time, and to state any corrections or changes of view that have com- mended themselves to me in the meantime. Such changes or modifications of view must of necessity occur to every geologi- cal worker. Sometimes, after long digging and hammering in some bed rich in fossils, and carrying home a bag laden with treasures, one has returned to the spot, and turned over the debris of previous excavation, with the result of finding some- thing rare and valuable, before overlooked. Or, in carefully trimming and chiselling out the matrix of a new fossil, so as to uncover all its parts, unexpected and novel features may develop themselves. Thus, if we were right or partially right before, our new experience may still enable us to enlarge our views or to correct some misapprehensions. In that spirit I have endeavoured to revise these papers, and while I have been able to add confirmations of views long ago expressed, have been willing to accept corrections and modifications based on later discoveries. In the somewhat extended span of work which has been allotted to me, I have made it my object to discover new facts, and to this end have spared no expenditure of time and labour; but I have felt that the results of discoveries in the THE STARTING-POINT works of God should not be confined to a coterie, but should be made public for the benefit of all. Hence I have gladly embraced any opportunities to popularise my results, whether in lectures, articles, popular books, or in the instruction of students, and this in a manner to give accurate knowledge, and perhaps to attract the attention of fellow-workers to points which they might overlook if presented merely in dry and technical papers. These objects I have in view in connection with the present collection of papers, and also the fact that my own pilgrimage is approaching its close, and that I desire to aid others who may chance to traverse the ground I have passed over, or who may be preparing to pass beyond the point I have reached. To a naturalist of seventy years the greater part of life lies in the past, and in revising these papers I have necessarily had my thoughts directed to the memory of friends, teachers, guides, and companions in labour, who have passed away. I have therefore, as a slight token of loving and grateful remem- brance dedicated these papers to the memory of men I have known and loved, and who, I feel, would sympathise with me in spirit, in the attempt, however feeble, to direct attention to the variety and majesty of those great works of the Creator which they themselves delighted to study. Since the design of these papers excludes special details as to Canadian geology, or that of those old eastern countries to which I have given some attention, I must refer for them to other works, and shall append such reference of this kind as may be necessary. At the same time it will be observed that as my geological work has been concerned most largely with the oldest and newest rocks of the earth, and with the history of life rather than with rocks and minerals, there must neces- sarily be some preponderance in these directions, which might however, independently of personal considerations, be justified by the actual value of these lines of investigation, and by the THE STARTING-POINT special interest attaching to them in the present state of scien- tific discovery. Having thus defined my starting-point, I would now with all respect and deference ask the reader to accompany me from ])oint to point, and to examine for himself the objects which may appear either near, or in the dim uncertain distance, in illustration of what the world is, and how it became what it is. Perhaps, in doing so, he may be able to perceive much more than I have been able to discover ; and if so, I shall rejoice, even if such further insight should correct or counteract some of my own impressions. It is not given to any one age or set of men to comprehend all the mysteries of nature, or to arrive at a point where it can be said, there is no need of farther exploration. Even in the longest journey of the most adven- turous traveller there is an end of discovery, and, in the study of nature, cape rises beyond cape and mountain behind moun- tain interminably. The finite cannot comprehend the infinite, the temporal the eternal. We need not, however, on that account be agnostics, for it is still true that, within the scope of our narrow powers and opportunities, the Supreme Intelli- gence reveals to us in nature His power and divinity ; and it is this, and this alone, that gives attraction and dignity to natural science. WORLD-MAKIXG. DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF ADAM SEDGWICK AND SIR RODERICK IMPEY MURCHISON', Whose joint Labours cakkisd OUR Knowledge of the History of the Earth TWO Stages farther back, AND WHOSE Differences of Opinion served to render MORE glorious THEIR VICTORIES. Vision of a Xascent World — Thk Oi.ukst Rocks — De- velopment OF Lite — Fok>l\tiox of Continents — In what Sense Permanent — America as an Example ^2- - '^ CHAPTER II. WORLD-MAKING. GEOLOGICAL reading, especially when of a strictly uniformitarian character and in warm weather, some- times becomes monotonous ; and I confess to a feeling of drowsiness creeping over me when preparing material for a pre- sidential address to the American Association for the Advance- ment of Science in August, 1883. In these circumstances I became aware of the presence of an unearthly visitor, who announced himself as of celestial birth, and intimated to me that being himself free from those restrictions of space and time which are so embarrassing to earthly students, he was pre- pared for the moment to share these advantages with me, and to introduce me to certain outlying parts of the universe, where I might learn something of its origin and €arly history. He took my hand, and instantly we were in the voids of spac2. Turning after a moment, he pointed to a small star and said, "That is the star you call the sun ; here, you see, it is only about the third magnitude, and in a few seconds it will disappear." These few seconds, indeed, reduced the whole visible firma- ment to a mere nebulous haze like the Milky ^^'ay, and we seemed to be in blank space. But pausing for a moment I became aware that around us were nmltitudes of dark bodies, so black that they were, so to speak, negatively visible, even in the almost total darkness around. Some seemed large and massive, some a mere drift of minute particles, formless and without distinct limits. Some were swiftly moving, others lO WORLD-MAKING stationary, or merely revolving on their own axes. It was a " horror of great darkness," and I trembled with fear. "This," said my guide, "is vdiat the old Hebrew seer called tohu ve bohii, ' formless and void,' the ' Tiamat ' or abyss of the old Chaldeans, the ' chaos and old night ' of the Greeks. Your nmndane physicists have not seen it, but they speculate re- garding it, and occupy themselves with questions as to whether it can be lightened and vivified by mere attractive force, or by collision of dark bodies impinging on each other with vast momentum. 'J'heir speculations are vain, and lead to nothing, because they ha\-e no data wherefrom to calculate the in- finite and eternal Power who determined either the attraction or tlie motion, or who willed which portion of this chaos was to become cosmos, and which was to remain for ever dead and dark. Let us turn, however, to a more hopeful prospect." We sped away to another scene. Here were vast luminous bodies, such as we call nebulae. Some were globular, others disc-like, others annular or like spiral wisps, and some were composed of several concentric shells or rings. All were in rapid rotation, and presented a glorious and bril- liant spectacle. "This," said my guide, " is matter of the same kind with that we have just been considering ; but it has been set in active motion. The fiat ' Let there be light ! ' has been issued to it. Nor is its motion in vain. Each of these ne- bulous masses is the material of a system of worlds, and they will produce systems of different forms in accordance with the various shapes and motions which you observe. Such bodies are well known to earthly astronomers. One of them, the great nebula of Andromeda, has been photographed, and is a vast system of luminous rings of vapour placed nearly edgewise to the earth, and hundreds of times greater than the whole solar system, but now let us annihilate lime, and consider the^e gigantic bodies as they will be in the course of many millions of years." Listantaneously these vast nebuUxj had concentratetl WORLD- MAKING II themselves into systems of suns and planets, but with this difference from ours, that the suns were very large and sur- rounded with a wide luminous haze, and each of the planets was self-luminous, like a little sun. In some the planets were dancing up and down in spiral lines. In others they were moving in one plane. In still others, in every variety of direction. Some had vast numbers of little planets and satellites. Others had a few of larger size. There were even some of these systems that had a pair of central suns of con- trasting colours. The whole scene was so magnificent and beautiful that I thought 1 could never weary of gazing on it. " Here," said he, " we have the most beautiful condition of systems of worlds, when considered from a merely physical point of view : the perfection of solar and planetary luminousness, but which is destined to pass away in the interest of things more important, if less showy. This is the condition of the great star Sirius, which the old priest astronomers of the Nile Valley made so much of in their science and religion, and which they called Sothis. It is now known by your star- gazers to be vastly larger than your sun, and fifty times more brilliant.^ Let us select one of these systems somewhat similar to the solar system, and suppose that the luminous atmospheres of its nearer i)lanets are beginning to wane in brilliancy. Here is one of them, through whose halo of light we can see the body of the planet. What do you now per- ceive ?" The planet referred to was somewhat larger in appear- ance than our earth, and, approaching near to it, I could see that it had a cloud-bearing firmament, and that it seemed to have continents and oceans, though disposed in more regular forms than on our own planet, and with a smaller proportion of land. Looking at it more closely, I searched in vain for * In evidence of these and other statements I may refer to Iluggins' recent address as President of the British Association, and to tlie " Story of the Heavens," etc., by Sir Robert Ball. 12 WORLD-MAKING any sign of animal life, but I saw a vast profusion of what might be plants, but not like those of this world.^ These were trees of monstrous stature, and their leaves, which were of great size and shaped like fronds of seaweeds, were not usually green, but variegated with red, crimson and orange. The sur- face of the land looked like beds of gigantic specimens ot Colias and similar variegated-leaved plants, the whole present- ing a most gorgeous yet grotesque spectacle. " This," said my guide, " is the primitive vegetation which clothes each of the planets in its youthful state. The earth was once so clothed, in the time v,-hen vegetable life alone existed, and there were no animals to prey upon it, and when the earth was, like the world you now look upon, a paradise of plants ; for all things in nature are at first in their best estate. This vegetation is known to you on the earth only by the Carbon and Graphite buried in your oldest rocks. It still lingers on your neighbour Mars,~ which has, however, almost passed beyond this stage, and we are looking forward before long to see a still more gigantic though paler development of it in altogether novel shapes on the great continents that are being formed on the surface of Jupiter. But look again." And time being again annihilated, I saw the same world, now destitute of any luiiiinous envelope, with a few dark clouds in its atmosphere, and presenting just the same appearance which I would sup- pose our earth to present to an astronomer viewing it with a powerful telescope from the moon. " Here we are at home again,"' said my guide; "good-bye." I found myself nodding over my table, and that my ])en had just dropped from my hand, making a large blot on my paper. My dream, however, * We shall see farther on that there is reason to believe that the primitive land vegetation was more diflerent from that of the Devonian and Carboni- ferous than it is from that of the present day. '^ Mars is probably a stage behind the earth in its development, and the ruddy line of its continents would seem to be due to some organic covering. WORI.D-MAKING 1 3 gave me a hint as to a subject, and I determined to devote my address to a consideration of questions whicli geology has not solved, or has only imperfectly and hypothetically dis- cussed. Such unsolved or partially solved questions must necessarily exist in a science which covers the whole history of the earth in time. At the beginning it allies itself with astronomy and physics and celestial chemistry. At the end it runs into human history, and is mixed up with archaeology and anthro- pology. Throughout its whole course it has to deal with tjuestions of meteorology, geography and biology. In short, there is no department of physical or biological science, with which this many-sided study is not allied, or at least on which the geologist may not presume to trespass. When, therefore, it is proposed to discuss in the present chapter some of the unsolved problems and disputed questions of this universal science, the reader need not be surprised if it should be some- what discursive. Perhaps we may begin at the utmost limits of the subject by remarking that in matters of natural and physical science we are met at the outset with the scarcely solved question as to our own place in the nature which we study, and the bearing of this on the difficulties we encounter. The organism of man is decidedly a part of nature. We place ourselves, in this aspect, in the sub-kingdom vertebrata and class mammalia, and recognise the fact that man is the terminal link in a chain of being, extending throughout geological time. But the or- ganism is not all that belongs to man, and when we regard him as a scientific inquirer, we raise a new question. If the human mind is a part of nature, then it is subject to natural law, and nature includes mind as well as matter. Indeed, without being absolute idealists we may hold that mind is more potent than matter, and nearer to the real essence of things. Our science is in any case necessarily dualistic, being the product 14 WORLD-MAKING of the reaction of mind on nature, and must be largely sub- jective and anthropomorphic. Hence, no doubt, arises much of the controversy of science, and much of the unsolved diffi- culty. We recognise this when we divide science into that which is experimental, or depends on apparatus, and that which is observational and classificatory — distinctions these which relate not so much to the objects of science as to our methods of pursuing them. This view also opens up to us the thought that the domain of science is practically boundless, for who can set limits to the action of mind on the universe, or of the universe on mind. It follows that science, as it exists at any one time, must be limited on all sides by unsolved mysteries ; and it will not serve any good purpose to meet these with clever guesses. If we so treat the enigmas of the sphinx nature, we shall surely be devoured. Nor, on the other hand, must we collapse into absolute despair, and resign ourselves to the confession of inevitable ignorance. It becomes us rather boldly to confront the unsolved questions of nature, and to wrestle with their difficulties till we master such as we can, and cheerfully leave those we cannot overcome to be grappled with by our successors. Fortunately, as a geologist, I do not need to invite attention to those transcendental questions which relate to the ultimate constitution of matter, the nature of the ethereal medium filling space, the absolute difference or identity of chemical elements, the cause of gravitation, the conservation and dissipation of energy, the nature of life, or the primary origin of bioplasmic matter. I may take the much more humble role of an in- quirer into the unsolved or partially .solved problems which meet us in considering that short and imperfect record which geology studies in the rocky layers of the earth's crust, and which leads no farther back than to the time when a solid rind had already formed on the earth, and was already covered with an ocean. This record of geology covers but a small WORLD-MAKING 1 5 part of the history of the earth and of the system to which it belongs, nor does it enter at all into the more recondite problems involved ; still it forms, I believe, some necessary preparation at least to the comprehension of these. If we are to go farther back, we must accept the guidance of physicists rather than of geologists, and I must say that in this physical cosmology both geologists and general readers are likely to find themselves perplexed with the vagaries in which the most sober mathematicians may indulge. We are told that the original condition of the solar system was that of a vaporous and nebulous cloud intensely heated and whirling rapidly round, that it probably came into this condition by the impact of two dark solid bodies striking each other so violently, that they became intensely heated and resolved into the smallest possible fragments. Lord Kelvin attributes this impact to their being attracted together by gravitative force. Croll ^ argues that in addition to gravitation these bodies must have had a proper motion of great velocity, which Lord Kelvin thinks " enormously " improbable, as it would require the solid bodies to be shot against each other with a marvellously true aim, and this not in the case of the sun only, but of all the stars. It is rather more improbable than it would be to affirm that in the artillery practice of two opposing armies, cannon balls have thousands of times struck and shattered each other midway between the hostile batteries. The ques- tion, we are told, is one of great moment to geologists, since on the one hypothesis the duration of our system has amounted to only about twenty millions of years ; on the other, it may have lasted ten times that number.- In any case it seems a strange way of making systems of worlds, that they should result from the chance collision of multitudes of solid bodies ^ " Stellar Evolution." - Other facts favour the sliorter time (Clarence King, Am. Jl. of Science, vol. xlv. , 3rd series), S. E. 2 l6 WORLD-MAKING rushing hither and thither in space, and it is almost equally strange to imagine an intelligent Creator banging these bodies about like billiard balls in order to make worlds. Still, in that case we might imagine them not to be altogether aimless. The question only becomes more complicated when with Grove and Lockyer we try to reach back to an antecedent condition, when there are neither solid masses nor nebulas, but only an inconceivably tenuous and universally diffused medium made up of an embryonic matter, which has not yet even resolved itself into chemical elements. How this could establish any motion within itself tending to aggregation in masses, is quite inconceivable. To plodding geologists labori- ously collecting facts and framing conclusions therefrom, such flights of the mathematical mind seem like the wildest fan- tasies of dreams. We are glad to turn from them to examine those oldest rocks, which are to us the foundation stones of the earth's crust. What do we know of the oldest and most primitive rocks ? At this moment the question may be answered in many and discordant ways ; yet the leading elements of the answer may be given very simply. The oldest rock formation known to geologists is the Lower Laurentian, the Fundamental Gneiss, the Lewisian formation of Scotland, the Ottawa gneiss of Canada, the lowest Archaean crystalline rocks. This forma- tion, of enormous thickness, corresponds to what the older geologists called the fundamental granite, a name not to be scouted, for gneiss is only a stratified or laminated granite. Perhaps the main fact in relation to this old rock is that it is a gneiss ; that is, a rock at once bedded and crystalline, and having for its dominant ingredient the mineral orthoclasc, a compound of silica, alumina and potash, in which are imbedded, as in a paste, grains and crystals of quartz and hornblende. We know very well from its texture and composition that it cannot be a product of mere heat, and being a bedded rock WORLD-MAKING 1 7 we infer that it was laid down layer by layer in the manner of aqueous deposits. On the other hand, its chemical com- position is quite different from that of the muds, sands and gravels usually deposited from water. Their special charac- ters are caused by the fact that they have resulted from the slow decay of rocks like these gneisses, under the operation of carbon dioxide and water, whereby the alkaline matter and the more soluble part of the silica have been washed away, leaving a residue mainly silicious and aluminous. Such more modern rocks tell of dry land subjected to atmospheric decay and rain-wash. If they have any direct relation to the old gneisses, they are their grandchildren, not their parents. On the contrary, the oldest gneisses show no pebbles or sand or limestone — nothing to indicate that there was then any land undergoing atmospheric waste, or shores with sand and gravel. For all that we know to the contrary, these old gneisses may have been deposited in a shoreless sea, hold- ing in solution or suspension merely what it could derive from a submerged crust recently cooled from a state of fusion, still thin, and exuding here and there through its fissures heated waters and volcanic products. This, it may be observed here, is just what we have a right to expect, if the earth was once a heated or fluid mass, and if our oldest Laurentian rocks consist of the first beds or layers deposited upon it, perhaps by a heated ocean. It has been well said that " the secret of the earth's hot youth has been well kept." But with the help of physical science we can guess at an originally heat-liquefied ball with denser matter at its centre, lighter and oxidised matter at its surface. We can imagine a scum or crust form- ing at the surface ; and from what we know of the earth's in- terior, nothing is more likely to have constituted that slaggy ' Carbon dioxide, the great agent in the decay of silicious rocks, must then have constituted a very much larger part of the atmosphere than at present. WORLD-MAKING crust than the material of our old gneisses. As to its bedded character, this may have arisen in part from the addition of cooling layers below, in part from the action of heated \Yater above, and in part from pressure or tension ; while, wherever it cracked or became broken, its interstices would be injected with molten matter from beneath. All this may be conjecture, but it is based on known facts, and is the only probable con- jecture. If correct, it would account for the fact that the gneissic rocks are the lowest and oldest that we reach in every part of the earth. In short, the fundamental gneiss of the Lower Laurentian may have been the first rock ever formed ; and in any case it is a rock formed under conditions which have not since re- curred, except locally. It constitutes the first and best example of those chemico-physical, aqueous or aqueo-igneous rocks, so characteristic of the earliest period of the earth's history. "\'iewed in this way the Lower Laurentian gneiss is probably the oldest kind of rock we shall ever know — the limit to our backward progress, beyond which there remains nothing to the geologist except physical hypotheses respecting a cooling incan- descent globe. For the chemical conditions of these primitive rocks, and what is known as to their probable origin, I may refer to the writings of my friends, the late Dr. Sterry Hunt and Dr. J. G. Bonney, to whom we owe so much of what is known of the older crystalline rocks^ as well as of their literature, and the questions which they raise. My purpose here is to sketch the remarkable difference which \vc meet as we ascend into the Middle and Upper Laurentian. In the next succeeding formation, the middle part of the Laurentian of Logan, the Grenville series of Canada, we meet with a great and significant change. It is true we have still a predominance of gneisses which may have been formed in the ' Hunt, "Essays on Chemical Geology"; Bonney, "Addresses to ]5iilish Association and Geological Society of London." WORLD-MAKING IQ same manner with those below them ; but we find these now- associated with great beds of limestone and dolomite, which must have been formed by the separation of cnlcium and mag- nesium carbonates from the sea water, either by chemical pre- cipitation or by the agency of living beings. We have also quartzite, quartzose gneisses, and even pebble beds, which in- form us of sandbanks and shores. Nay, more, we have beds containing graphite which must be the residue of plants, and iron ores which tell of the deoxidation of iron oxide by organic matters. In short, here we have evidence of new factors in world-building, of land and ocean, of atmospheric decay of rocks, of deoxidizing processes carried on by vegetable life on the land and in the waters, of limestone-building in the sea. To afford material for such rocks, the old Ottawa gneiss must have been lifted up into continents and mountain masses by bendings and foldings of the original crust. Under the slow but sure action of the carbon dioxide dissolved in rainwater, its felspar had crumbled down in the course of ages. Its potash, soda, lime, magnesia, and part of its silica had been washed into the sea, there to enter into new combinations and to form new deposits. The crumbling residue of fine clay and sand had been also washed down into the borders of the ocean, and had been there deposited in beds. Thus the earth had entered into a new phase, which continues onward through the geological ages ; and I place in the reader's hands one key for unlocking the mystery of the world in affirming that this great change took place, this new era was inaugurated in the midst of the Laurentian period, the oldest of our great divisions of the earth's geological history.' ' I follow the original arrangement oi Logan, who first delintd lliis succession in the extensive and excellent exposures of these rocks in Canada. Klsewlicre the subject h.is often been confused and mixed with local de- tails. The same facts, though sometimes under dilTerent names, are re- corded by the geologists of Scandinavia, Britain, and the United States, 20 WORLD-MAKING Was not this a fit period for the first appearance of life? should we not expect it to appear, independently of the evidence of the fact, so soon at least as the temperature of the ocean falls sufficiently low to permit its existence ? ^ I do not propose to enter here into that evidence. This we shall have occasion to consider in the sequel. I would merely say here that we should bear in mind that in this latter half of the Lower Laurentian, or if we so choose to style it, Middle Laurentian period, we have the conditions required for life in the sea and on the land ; and since in other periods we know that life was always present when its conditions were present, it is not unreasonable to look for the earliest traces of life in this forma- tion, in which we find, for the first time, the completion ot those physical arrangements which make life, in such forms of it as exist in the sea, possible. This is also a proper place to say something of the disputed doctrine of what is termed metamorphism, or the chemical and molecular changes which old rocks have undergone. The Laurentian rocks are undoubtedly greatly changed from their original state, more especially in the matters of crystalli- zation and the formation of disseminated minerals, by the action of heat and heated water. .Sandstones have thus passed into quartzites, clays into slates and schists, limestones into mar- bles. So far, metamorphism is not a doubtful question ; but when theories of metamorphism go so far as to suppose an actual change of one element for another, they go beyond the bounds of chemical credibility ; yet such theories of meta- morphism are often boldly advanced and made the basis of important conclusions. Dr. Hunt has happily given the name " metasomatosis " to this imaginary and improbable kind of and the acceptance of tlie conclusions of Nicol and Lapworlli lias served to bring even the rocks of the Iliglilands of Scotland more into line with those of Canada. ' Dana stales this al iSo ]•'. for plants and uo for animals. WORLD-MAKING 21 metamorphism. I would have it to be understood that, in speaking of the metamorphism of the older crystaUine rocks, it is not to this metasomatosis that I refer, and that I hold that rocks which have been produced out of the materials decom- posed by atmospheric erosion can never by any process of metamorphism be restored to the precise condition of the Laurentian rocks. Thus, there is in the older formations a genealogy of rocks, which, in the absence of fossils, may be used with some confidence, but which does not apply to the more modern deposits, and which gives a validity to the use of mineral character in classifying older rocks which does not hold for later formations. Still, nothing in geology abso- lutely perishes, or is altogether discontinued ; and it is prob- able that, down to the present day, the causes which produced the old Laurentian gneiss may still operate in limited locali- ties. Then, however, they were general, not exceptional. It is further to be observed that the term gneiss is sometimes of wide and even loose application. Beside the typical orthoclase and hornblendic gneiss of the Laurentian, there are micaceous, quartzose, garnetiferous and many other kinds of gneiss ; and even gneissose rocks, which hold labradorite or anorthite in- stead of orthoclase, are sometimes, though not accurately, in- cluded in the term. The Grenville series, or Middle Laurentian, is succeeded by what Logan in Canada called the Upper Laurentian, and which other geologists have called the Norite or Norian series. Here we still have our old friends the gneisses, but somewhat peculiar in type, and associated with them are great beds and masses, rich in lime-felspar, the so-called labradorite and anorthite rocks. The precise origin of these is uncertain, but this much seems clear, namely, that they originated in circumstances in which the great limestones deposited in the Lower or Middle Lauren- tian were beginning to be employed in the manufacture, prob- ably by a([ueo-igneous agencies, of iime-felspars. This proves 22 WORLD-MAKING the Norian rocks to be younger than the Lower Laurentian, and that, as Logan supposed, considerable earth movements had occurred between the two, implying lapse of time, while it is also evident that the folding and crumpling of the Lower Lau- rentian had led to great outbursts of igneous matter from below the crust, or from its under part. •Next to the Laurentian, but probably after an interval, the rocks of which are yet scarcely known, we have the Huronian of Logan, a series much less crystalline and more fragmentary, and affording more evidence of land elevation and atmo- spheric and aqueous erosion than those preceding it. It has extensive beds of volcanic rock, great conglomerates, some of them made up of rounded fragments of Laurentian rocks, and others of (juartz pebbles, which must have been the remains of rocks subjected to very perfect decay. The pure quartz-rocks tell the same tale, while slates and limestones speak also of chemical separation of the materials of older rocks. The Hu- ronian evidently tells of previous movements in the Lauren- tian, and changes which allowed the Huronian to be deposited along its shores and on the edges of its beds. Yet the Huronian itself is older than the Palaeozoic series, and affected by power- ful earth movements at an earlier date. Life existed in the waters in LIuronian times. We have spicules of sponges in the limestone, and organic markings on the slaty beds ; but they are few, and their nature is uncertain. Succeeding the Huronian, and made up of its dcbrii and that of the Laurentian, we have the great Cambrian series, that in which we first find undoubted evidence of abundant marine life, and which thus forms the first chapter in the great Palaeozoic book of the early history of the world. Here let it be observed we have at least two wide gaps in our history, marked by the crum])ling up, first, of the Laurentian, and then of the Huronian beds. After what has been said, the reader will perhaps nut be WORLD-MAKING 23 astonished that fierce geological battles have raged over the old crystalline rocks. By some geologists they are almost entirely explained away, or referred to igneous action, or to the alteration of ordinary sediments. Under the treatment of another school they grow to great series of Pre-Cambrian rocks, constituting vast systems of formations, distinguishable from each other chiefly by differences of mineral character. Facts and fossils are daily being discovered, by which these disputes will ultimately be settled. After the solitary appearance of Eozoon in the Laurentian, and of a few uncertain forms in the Huronian, we find our- selves, in the Cambrian, in the presence of a nearly complete invertebrate fauna of protozoa, polyps, echinoderms, moUusks and Crustacea, and this not confined to one locality merely, but apparently extended simultaneously throughout the ocean, over the whole world. This sudden incoming of animal life, along with the subsequent introduction of successive groups of invertebrates, and finally of vertebrate animals, furnishes one of the greatest unsolved problems of geology, which geologists were wont to settle by the supposition of successive creations. In the sequel I shall endeavour to set forth the facts as to this succession, and the general principles involved in it, and to show the insufficiency of certain theories of evolution suggested by biologists to give any substantial aid to the geologist in these questions. At present I propose merely to notice some of the general principles which should guide us in studying the development of life in geological time, and the causes which have baffled so many attempts to throw light on this obscure portion of our unsolved problems. It has been urged on the side ot rational evolution— and there are both rational and irrational forms of this many-sided doctrine — that this hypothesis does not profess to give an explanation of the absolute origin of life on our planet, or even of the original organization of a single cell, or of a simple mass 24 WORLD-MAKING of protoplasm, living or dead. All experimental attempts to produce by synthesis the complex albuminous substances, or to obtain the living from the non-living, have so far been fruitless, and indeed we cannot imagine any process by which such changes could be effected. That they have been effected we know, but the process employed by their maker is still as mysterious to us as it probably was to him who wrote the words : — " And God said, Let the waters swarm with swarmers." How vast is the gap in our knowledge and our practical power implied in this admission, which must, however, be made by every mind not absolutely blinded by a superstitious belief in those forms of words which too often pass current as philosophy. But if we are content to start with a number of organisms ready made — a somewhat humiliating start, however — we still have to ask — How do these vary so as to give new species ? It is a singular illusion, and especially in the case of men who I)rofess to be believers in natural law, that variation may be boundless, aimless and fortuitous, and that it is by spontaneous selection from varieties thus produced that development arises. But surely the supposition of mere chance and magic is un- worthy of science. Varieties must have causes, and their causes and their effects must be regulated by some law or laws. Now it is easy to see that they cannot be caused by a mere innate tendency in the organism itself. Every organism is so nicely equilibrated that it has no such spontaneous tendency, except within the limits set by its growth and the law of its }>eriodical changes. There may, however, be equilibrium more or less stable. I believe all attempts hitherto made have failed to account for the fixity of certain, nay, of very many, types throughout geological time, but the mere consideration that one may be in a more stable state of equilibrium than another, so far explains it. A rocking stone has no more spontaneous tendency to move than an ordinary boulder, hut WORLD-MAKING 2$ it may be made to move with a touch. So it probably is with organisms. But if so, then the causes of variation are external, as in many cases we actually know them to be, and they must depend on instability with change in surroundings, and this so arranged as not to be too extreme in amount, and to operate in some determinate direction. Observe how remarkable the unity of the adjustments involved in such a supposition ! — how superior they must be to our rude and always more or less unsuccessful attempts to produce and carry forward varieties and races in definite directions ! This cannot be chance. If it exists, it must depend on plans deeply laid in the nature of things, else it would be most monstrous magic and causeless miracle. Still more certain is this conclusion when we con- sider the vast and orderly succession made known to us by geology, and which must have been regulated by fixed laws, only a few of which are as yet known to us. Beyond these general considerations we have others of a more special character, based on palceontological facts, which show how imperfect are our attempts as yet to reach the true causes of the introduction of genera and species. One is the remarkable fixity of the leading types of living beings in geological time. If, instead of framing, like Haeckel, fanciful phylogenies, we take the trouble, with Barrande and Gaudry, to trace the forms of life through the period of their existence, each along its own line, we shall be greatly struck with this, and especially with the continuous existence of many low types of life through vicissitudes of physical conditions of the most stupendous character, and over a lapse of time scarcely conceivable. What is still more remarkable is that this holds in groups which, within certain limits, are perhaps the most variable of all. In the present world no creatures are individually more variable than the protozoa ; as, for example, the foraminifera and the sponges. Yet these groups are fundamentally the same, from the beginning of the Palceo- 26 WORLD-MAKING zoic until now, and modern species seem scarcely at all to differ from specimens procured from rocks at least half-way back to the beginning of our geological record. If we suppose that the present sponges and foraniinifera are the descendants of those of the Silurian period, we can affirm that in all that vast lapse of time they have, on the whole, made little greater change than that which may be observed in variable forms at present. The same remark applies to other low animal forms. In types somewhat higher and less variable, this is almost equally noteworthy. The pattern of the venation of the wings of cockroaches, and the structure and form of land snails, gally-worms and decapod crustaceans were all settled in the ('arboniferous age, in a way that still remains. So were the foliage and the fructification of club-mosses and ferns. If, at any time, members of these groups branched off, so as to lay the foundation of new species, this must have been a very rare and exceptional occurrence, and one demanding even some suspension of the ordinary laws of nature. We may perhaps be content on this question to say with Gaudry,^ that it is not yet possible to " pierce the mystery that surrounds the development of the great classes of animals," or with Prof. Williamson,- that in reference to fossil plants " the time has not yet arrived fur the appointment of a botanical King-at-arms and Constructor of pedigrees." A\'c shall, how- ever, find that by abandoning mere hypothetical causes and carefully noting the order of the development and the causes in operation, so far as known, we may reach to ideas as to cause and mode, and the laws of succession, even if unable to pene- trate the mystery of origins. .\nother caution which a pakieontologist has occasion to give with regard to theories of life, has reference to the tendency of biologists to infer that animals and plants were iiitrodiiced ' " EnchaiiiemciUs dii Moiule Animal,'' Paris, 1SS3. - Address before Royal Institution, Feb., 18S3. WORLD-MAKING 2/ under embryonic forms, and at first in few and imperfect species. Facts do not substantiate this. The first appearance of leading types of life is rarely embryonic, or of the nature of immature individuals. On the contrary, they often appear in highly perfect and specialized forms, often, however, of compo- site type and expressing characters afterwards so separated as to belong to higher groups. The trilobites of the Cambrian are some of them of few segments, and so far embryonic, but the greater part are many-segmented and very complex. The batrachians of the Carboniferous present many characters higher than those of their modern successors and now appropriated to the true reptiles. The reptiles of the Permian and Trias usurped some of the prerogatives of the mammals. The ferns, lycopods and equisetums of the Devonian and Carboniferous were, in fructification, not inferior to their modern representa- tives, and in the structure of their stems" far superior. The shell-bearing cephalopods of the Paleeozoic would seem to have possessed structures now special to a higher group, that of the cuttle-fishes. The bald and contemptuous negation of these facts by Haeckel and other biologists does not tend to give geologists much confidence in their dicta. Again, we are now prepared to say that the struggle for existence, however plausible as a theory, when put before us in connection with the productiveness of animals and the few survivors of their multitudinous progeny, has not been the determining cause of the introduction of new species. The periods of rapid introduction of new forms of marine life were not periods of struggle, but of expansion — those periods in which the submergence of continents afforded new and large space for their extension and comfortable subsistence. In like manner, it was continental emergence that afforded the oppor- tunity for the introduction of land animals and plants. Fur- ther, in connection with this, it is now an established conclusion tliat the great aggressive faunas and floras of the continents 28 WORLD-MAKING have originated in the north, some of them within the arctic circle, and this in periods of exceptional warmth, when the perpetual summer sunshine of the arctic regions coexisted with a warm temperature. The testimony of the rocks thus is that not struggle but expansion furnished the requisite conditions for new forms of life, and that the periods of struggle were characterized by depauperation and extinction. But we are sometimes told that organisms are merely mechanical, and that the discussions respecting their origin have no significance any more than if they related to rocks or crystals, because they relate merely to the organism considered as a machine, and not to that which may be supposed to be more important, namely, the great determining power of mind and will. That this is a mere evasion by which we really gain nothing, will appear from a characteristic extract of an article by an eminent biologist in the new edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica, a publication which, I am sorry to say, instead of its proper role as a repertory of facts, has admitted partisan papers, stating extreme and unproved speculations as if they were conclusions of science. The statement referred to is as follows : — "A mass of living protoplasm is simply a molecular machine of great complexity, the total results of the working of which, or its vital phenomena, depend on the one hand on its construction, and on the other, on the energy supplied to it ; and to speak of vitality as anything but the name for a series of operations is as if one should talk of the horologity of a clock." It would, I think, scarcely be possible to put into the same number of words a greater amount of unscientific assumption and unproved statement than in this sentence. Is " living proto[)lasm " different in anyway from dead protoplasm, and if so, what causes the difference ? What is a " machine "? Can we conceive of a self-produced or uncaused machine, or one not intended to work out some definite results ? The results of the machine in question are said to be " vital phenomena '" ; WORLD-MAKING 29 certainly most wonderful results, and greater than those of any machine man has yet been able to construct. But why " vital " ? If there is no such thing as life, surely they are merely physical results. Can mechanical causes produce other than physical effects ? To Aristotle life was " the cause of form in organ- isms." Is not this quite as likely to be true as the converse pro- position ? If the vital phenomena depend on the " construction " of the machine, and the "energy supplied to it," whence this construction and whence this energy ? The illustration of the clock does not help us to answer this question. The construc- tion of the clock depends on its maker, and its energy is de- rived from the hand that winds it up. If we can think of a clock which no one has made, and which no one winds, a clock constructed by chance, set in harmony with the universe by chance, wound up periodically by chance, we shall then have an idea parallel to that of an organism living, yet without any vital energy or creative law ; but in such a case we should certainly have to assume some antecedent cause, whether we call it "horologity " or by some other name. Perhaps the term evolution would serve as well as any other, were it not that common sense teaches that nothing can be spontaneously evolved out of that in which it did not previously exist. There is one other unsolved problem in the study of life by the geologist to which it is still necessary to advert. This is the inability of palaeontology to fill up the gaps in the chain of being. In this respect we are constantly taunted with the im- perfection of the record, a matter so important that it merits a separate treatment ; but facts show that this is much more complete than is generally supposed. Over long periods of time and many lines of being we have a nearly continuous chain, and if this does not show the tendency desired, the fault is as likely to be in the theory as in the record. On the other hand, the abrupt and simultaneous appearance of new types in many specific and generic forms and over wide and 30 WORLU-MAKIXG separate areas at one and the same time, is too often repeated to be accidental. Hence palaeontologists, in endeavouring to establish evolution, have been obliged to assume periods of exceptional activity in the introduction of species, alternating \vith others of stagnation, a doctrine differing very little from that of special creation, as held by the older geologists. The attempt has lately been made to account for these breaks by the assumption that the geological record relates only to periods of submergence, and gives no information as to those of elevation. This is manifestly untrue. In so far as marine life is concerned, the periods of submergence are those in which new forms abound for very obvious reasons, already hinted ; but the periods of new forms of land and fresh-water life are those of elevation, and these have their own records and monuments, often very rich and ample, as, for example, the swamps of the Carboniferous, the transition from the great Cretaceous sub- sidence, when so much of the land of the Northern Hemisphere was submerged, to the new continents of the Tertiary, the Tertiary lake-basins of Western America, the Terraces and raised beaches of the Pleistocene. Had I time to refer in detail to the breaks in the continuity of life which cannot be explained by the imperfection of the record, I could show at least that nature in this case does advance per saltuin — by leaps, rather than by a slow continuous process. Many able reasoners, as Le Conte, in America, and Mivart and CoUard in England, hold this view. Here, as elsewhere, a vast amount of steady conscientious work is required to enable us to solve the problems of the history of life. But if so, the more the hope for the patient student and investigator. I know nothing more chilling to re- search, or unfavourable to progress, than the promulgation of a dogmatic decision that there is nothing to be learned but a merely fortuitous and uncaused succession, amenable to no law, and only to be covered, in order to hide its shapeless and WORLD-MAKING 31 uncertain proportions, by the mantle of bold and gratuitous hypothesis. So soon as we find evidence of continents and oceans we raise the question, Have those continents existed from the first in their present position and form, or have the land and water changed places in the course of geological time? This ques- tion also deserves a separate and more detailed consideration. In reality both statements are true in a certain limited sense. On the one hand, any geological map whatever suffices to show that the general outline of the existing land began to be formed in the first and oldest crumplings of the crust. On the other hand, the greater part of the surface of the land consists of marine sediments which must have been deposited when the continents were in great part submerged, and whose materials must have been derived from land that has perished in the process, while all the continental surfaces, except, perhaps, some high peaks and ridges, have been many times submerged. Both of these apparently contradictory statements are true ; and without assuming both, it is impossible to explain the existing contours and reliefs of the surface. In exceptional cases even portions of deep sea have been elevated, as in the case of the Polycistine deposits in the West Indies ; but these exceptions are as yet scarcely sufficient to prove the rule. In the case of North America, the form of the old nucleus of Laurentian rock in the north already marks out that of the finished continent, and the successive later formations have been laid upon the edges of this, like the successive loads of earth dumped over an embankment. But in order to give the great thickness of the Palaeozoic sediments, the land must ha\e been again and again submerged, and for long periods of time. Thus, in one sense, the continents have been fixed ; in another, they have been constandy fluctuating. Hall and Dana have well illustrated these points in so far as eastern North America s. E. 3 WORLD-MAKING is concerned. Prof. Hull of the Geological Survey of Ireland has had the boldness to reduce the fluctuations of land and water, as evidenced in the British Islands, to the form of a series of maps intended to show the physical geography of each successive period. The attempt is probably premature, and has been met with much adverse criticism ; but there can be no doubt that it has an element of truth. When we attempt to calculate what could have been supplied from the old Eozoic nucleus by decay and aqueous erosion, and when we take into account the greater local thickness of sediments towards the present sea-basins, we can scarcely avoid the conclusion that extensive areas once occupied by high land are now under the sea. But to ascertain the precise areas and position of these perished lands may now be impossible. In point of fact we are obliged to believe in the contempo- raneous existence in all geological periods, except perhaps the very oldest, of three sorts of areas on the surface of the earth : (i) Oceanic areas of deep sea, which must always have oc- cupied the bed of the present ocean, or parts of it ; (2) Conti- nental plateaus sometimes existing as low flats, or as higher table-lands, and sometimes submerged ; (3) Areas of plication or folding, more especially along the borders of the oceans, forming elevated lands rarely submerged and constantly afford- ing the material of sedimentary accumulations. We shall find, however, that these have changed places in a remarkable man- ner, though always in such a way that neither the life of the land nor of the waters was wholly extinguished in the process. luery geologist knows the contention which has been occasioned by the attempts to correlate the earlier Palaeozoic deposits of the Atlantic margin of North America with those forming at the same time on ihe interior plateau, and with those of intervening lines of plication and igneous disturbance. Stratigraphy, lithology and fossils are all more or less at fault in dealing with these questions, and while the general nature WORLD-MAKING 33 of the problem is understood by many geologists, its solution in particular cases is still a source of apparently endless debate. The causes and mode of operation of the great movements of the earth's crust which have produced mountains, plains and table-lands, are still involved in some mystery. One patent cause is the unequal settling of the crust towards the centre ; but it is not so generally understood as it should be, that the greater settlement of the ocean-bed has necessitated its pressure against the sides of the continents in the same manner that a huge ice-floe crushes a ship or a pier. The geological map of North America shows this at a glance, and impresses us with the fact that large portions of the earth's crust have not only been folded but bodily pushed back for great distances. On looking at the extreme north, we see that the great Laurentian mass of central Newfoundland has acted as a projecting pier to the space immediately west of it, and has caused the gulf of St. Lawrence to remain an undisturbed area since Palaeozoic times. Immediately to the south of this, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick are folded back. Still farther south, as Guyot has shown, the old sediments have been crushed in sharp folds against the Adirondack mass, which has sheltered the table-land of the Catskills and of the great lakes. South of this again the rocks of Pennsylvania and Maryland have been driven back in a great curve to the west. Move- ments of this kind on the Pacific coast of America have been still more stupendous, as well as more recent. Dr. G. M. Dawson ^ thus refers to the crushing action of the Pacific bed on the rocks of British Columbia, and this especially at two periods, the close of the Triassic and the close of the Cretace- ous : " The successive foldings and crushings which the Cor- dillera region has suffered have resulted in an actual change of position of the rocks now composing its western margin. ' Trans. Royal Society of Canada, 1S90. 34 WORLD-MAKING This change may have amounted since the beginning of Mesozoic time to one-third of its whole present width, which would place the line of the coast ranges about two degrees of longitude farther west." Here we have evidence that a tract of country 400 miles wide and consisting largely of mountain ranges and table-lands, has been crushed bodily back over two degrees of longitude ; and this applies not to British Columbia merely, but to the whole west coast from Alaska to Chili. Yet we know that any contraction of the earth's nucleus can crumple up only a very thin superficial crust, which in this case must have slid over the pasty mass below. ^ Let it be observed, however, that the whole lateral pressure of vast areas has been condensed into very narrow lines. Nothing, I think, can more forcibly show the enormous pressure to which the edges of the continents have been exposed, and at the same time the great sinking of the hard and resisting ocean- beds. Complex and difficult to calculate though these move- ments of plication are, they are more intelligible than the apparently regular pulsations of the flat continental areas, whereby they have alternately been below and above the waters, and which must have depended on somewhat regularly recurring causes, connected either with the secular cooling of the earth or with the gradual retardation of its rotation, or with both. There is, however, good reason to believe that the suc- cessive subsidences alternated with the movements of plication, and depended on upward bandings of the ocean floor, and also on the gradual slackening of the rotation of the earth. Throughout these changes, each successive elevation exposed the rocks for long ages to the decomposing influence of the atmosphere. Each submergence swept away and deposited as ' This view is quite consistent with the practical solidity of the earth, and with the action of local expansion by heat, of settlement of areas overloaded with sediment, and of primitive or downward sliding of beds. This we shall see in the sequel. WORLD-MAKING 35 sediment the material accumulated by decay. Every change of elevation was accompanied with changes of climate, and with modifications of the habitats of animals and plants. Were it possible to restore accurately the physical geography of the earth in all these respects, for each geological period, the data for the solution of many difficult questions would l>e furnished. We have wandered through space and time sufficiently for one chapter, and some of the same topics must come up later in other connections. Let us sum up in a word. In human history we are dealing with the short lives and limited plans of man. In the making of worlds we are conversant with the plans of a Creator with whom one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. ^^'e must not measure such things by our microscopic scale of time. Nor should we fail to see that vast though the ages of the earth are, they are parts of a continuous plan, and of a plan probably reaching in space and time immeasurably beyond our earth. When we trace the long history from an incandescent fire-mist to a finished earth, and vast ages occupied by the dynasties of plant and animal life, we see not merely a mighty maze, an almost endless pro- cession of changes, but that all of these were related to one another by a chain of causes and effects leading onward to greater variety and complexity, while retaining throughout the traces of the means employed. The old rocks and the ancient lines of folding and the perished forms of life are not merely a scaffolding set up to be thrown down, but the foundation stones of a great and symmetrical structure. Is it yet com- pleted ? Who can tell ? The earth may still be young, and infinite ages of a better history may lie before it. Rki EKENXES ' : Presidential Address to the American Association for the Advancement of Science, meeting at Minneapolis, 1S83. "The Story of the Earth and Man." Nintli edition, London, 1887. ^ The references in this and succeeding chapters are exclusively to papers and works by tlie author, on which the several chapters are based. THE IMPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD. DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF JOACHIN BARRANDE, One of the most successful Labourers IN THE Completion of the History of Life in its earlier stages. Nature of the Imperfection — Questions as to its ARISING from Want of Continuity, from Lack of Preservation, from Imperfect Collecting. Ex- amples— Land Snails, CARnoNiFEROus Batrachians, Paleozoic Sponges, Pleistocene Shells, Devonian and Cardoniferous Plants — ■ Comparative Perfec- tion IN the Case of Marine Shells, etc. — Possible Camhrian Scjuids — Questions as to A\'ant of First Chapters of thi: Rf.coki) Pracikai. Conclusions / CHAPTER III. THE IMPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD. COMPLAINTS of the imperfection of the geological record are rife among those biologists who expect to find continuous series of fossils representing the gradual trans- mutation of species. No doubt these gaps are in some cases portentous, and unfortunately they often occur just where it is most essential to certain general conclusions that they should be filled up. Instead, however, of making vague lamentations on the subject, it is well to inquire to what causes these gaps may be due, to what extent they invalidate the completeness of geological history for scientific purposes, and how they may best be filled. Here we may first remark that it is not so much the physical record of geology that is imperfect as the organic record. Ever since the time of Hutton and Playfair we have learned that the processes of mineral detrition and deposition are contin- uous, and have been so throughout geological time. The erosion of the land is constantly going on, every shower carries its tribute of earthy matter toward the sea, and every wave that strikes against a beach or cliff does some work toward the grinding of shells, pebbles or stone. Thus, everywhere around our continents there is a continuous deposition of beds of earthy matter, and it is this which, when elevated into new land, has given us our chronological series of geological forma- tions. True, the elevating process is not continuous, but, so 40 IMPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD far as we know, intermittent ; but it has been so often repeated that we have no reason to doubt that the wasting continents afford a complete series of aqueous deposits, since the time when the dry land first appeared. In recent years the Challenger expedition and similar dredg- ings have informed us of still another continuity of deposition in the depths of the ocean. There, where no detritus from the land, or only a very little fine volcanic ash or pumice has ever reached, we have, going on from age to age, a deposit of the hard parts of abyssal animals and of those that swim in the open sea ; so that if it were possible to bore or sink a shaft in some parts of the ocean, we should find not only a continu- ous bed, but a continuous series of pelagic life from the Laurentian to the present day. Thus we have continuous physical records, could we but reach or completely put them together, and eliminate the disturbing influence of merely local vicissitudes. It is when we begin to search the geological formations for fossils, that imperfection in our record first becomes painfully manifest. In tlic case of many groups of marine animals, as, for example, the shell-fish and the corals, and I may add the l)ivalve crustaceans, so admirably worked up by my friend Prof. Rupert Jones, we have very complete series. "With the land snails the case is altogether different. As stated in an- other paper of this series, a few species of these animals appear in the later PaLxozoic age, and after that they have no suc- cessors known to us in all the great periods covered by the Permian, the Trias, and the earlier Jurassic. A few air-breath- ing water-snails appear in the upper Jurassic, and true land snails are not met with again until the Tertiary, ^\'ere there no land snails in this vast la[)se of time? Have we two suc- cessive creations, so to speak, of these creatures at distant intervals ? ^^'ere they only diminished in numbers and distri- bution in the intervening time? Is the hiatus owing merely IMPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD 4 1 to the unlikelihood of such shells being preserved? Or is it owing to the lack of diligence and care in collecting? In this particular case we are, no doubt, disposed to say that the series must have been continuous. But we cannot be sure of this. In whatever way a few species of land snails were so early introduced in the time of the Devonian or of the Coal formation, if from physical vicissitudes or lack of proper pabulum they became extinct, there is no reason known to us why, when circumstances again became favourable, they should not be reintroduced in the same manner as at first, whether by development from allied types or otherwise. The fact that the few Devonian and Carboniferous species are very like those that still exist, perhaps makes against this supposition, but does not exclude it. If we suppose that new forms of life of low grade are introduced from time to time in the course of the geological ages, and if we adopt the Darwinian hypo- thesis of evolution, we arrive, as Naegeli has so well pointed out, at the strange paradox, that the highest forms of life must be the oldest of all, since they will be the descendants of the earliest of the lower animals, whereas the animals now of low grade may have been introduced later, and may not have had time to improve. But all our attempts to reduce nature to one philosophic expression necessarily lead to such paradoxes. On the other hand, the chances of the preservation of land snails in aqueous deposits are vastly less than those in favour of the preservation of aquatic species. The first Carboniferous species found ^ had been preserved in the very exceptional circumstances afforded by the existence of hollow trunks of Sigillariae on the borders of the Coal formation flats, and the others subsequently found were in beds no doubt receiving the drainage of neighbouring land areas. Still it is not un- common on the modern sea-shore, anywhere near the mouths of rivers, to find a few freshwater shells here and there. The ' Pupa vetusta of the Nova Scotia coal formation. 42 IMPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD carbonaceous beds of the Trias, the fossil soils of the Portland series, the estuarine Wealden beds would seem to be as favour- ably situated as those of the coal formation for preserving land shells, though possibly the flora of the Mesozoic was less suit- able for feeding such creatures than that of the Coal period, and they may consequently have become few and local. After all, perhaps more diligent collecting and more numerous col- lectors might succeed, and may succeed in the future, in filling this and similar gaps. It is a great mistake to suppose that discoveries of this kind are made by chance. It is only by the careful and painstaking examination of much material that the gaps in the geological record can be filled up, and I propose in the sequel of this article to note a few instances, in a country where the range of territory is altogether out of proportion to the number of observers, and which have come within my own knowledge. It was not altogether by accident that Sir C. Lyell and the writer discovered a few reptilian bones and a land snail in breaking up portions of the material filling an erect Sigillaria in the South Joggins coal measures. We were engaged in a deliberate survey of the section, to ascertain as far as might be the conditions of accumulation of coal, and one point which occurred to us was to inquire as to the circumstances of preservation of stumps of forest trees in an erect position, to trace their roots into the soils on which they stood, and to ascertain the circumstances in which they had been buried, had decayed, and had been filled with mineral matter. It was in questioning these erect trees on such subjects — and this not without some digging and hammering — that we made the dis- covery referred to. But we found such remains only in one tree, and they were very imperfect, and indicated only two species of batrachians and one land snail. There the discovery might have rested. But I undertook to follow it up. In successive visits to the I.\JPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD 43 coast, a large number of trees standing in the cliff and reefs, or fallen to the shore, were broken up and examined, the result being to discover that, with one unimportant exception, the productive trees were confined to one of the beds at Coal Mine Point, that from which the original specimens had been obtained. Attention was accordingly concentrated on this, and as many as thirty trees were at different times extracted from it, of which rather more than one-half proved more or less productive. By these means bones representing about sixty specimens and twelve species were extracted, besides numerous remains of land shells, millipedes, and scorpions. In this way a very complete idea was obtamed of the land life, or at least of the smaller land animals, of this portion of the coal formation of Nova Scotia. It is not too much to say that if similar repositories could be found in the succeeding forma- tions, and properly worked when found, our record of the history of land quadrupeds might be made very complete. When in 1855 I changed my residence from Nova Scotia to Montreal, and so was removed to some distance from the carboniferous rocks which I had been accustomed to study, I naturally felt somewhat out of place in a Cambro-Silurian dis- trict, more especially as my friend Billings had already almost exhausted its fossils. I found, however, a congenial field in the Pleistocene shell beds ; more especially as I had given some attention to recent marine animals when on the sea coast. The very perfect series of Pleistocene deposits in the St. Lawrence valley locally contain marine shells from the bottom of the till or boulder clay up to the overlying sands and gravels. The assemblage was a more boreal one than that on the coast of Nova Scotia, though many of the species were the same, and both the climatal and bathymetrial conditions differed in different parts of the Pleistocene beds themselves. The gap in the record here could at that time be filled up only by col- lecting recent shells. In addition to what could be obtained 44 IMPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD by exchanging with naturahsts who had collected in Greenland, Labrador, and Norway, I employed myself, summer after summer, in dredging both on the south and north shore of the St. Lawrence, until able at length to discover in a living state, but under different conditions as to temperature and depth, nearly every species found in the beds on the land, from the lower boulder clay to the top of the formation, and from the sea-level to the beds six hundred feet high on the hills. Not only so : 1 could ascertain in certain places and conditions all the peculiar varieties of the species, and the special modes of life which tliey indicated. Thus, in the cases of the Peter Redpath Museum, and in notes on the Post- pliocene of Canada, the gap between the Modern and the Glacial age was completely filled up in so far as Canadian marine species are concerned. The net result was, as I have elsewhere stated, that no change other than varietal had occurred. In studying the fossil plants of the Carboniferous, so abundant in the fine exposures of the coal formation in Nova Scotia, two defects struck me painfully. One was the fragmentary and imperfect state of the specimens procurable. Another was the question. What preceded these plants in the older rocks ? The first of these was to be met only by thorough exploration. When a fragment of a plant was disclosed it was necessary to inquire if more existed in the same bed, and to dig, or blast away or break up the rock, until some remaining portions were disclosed. In this way it has been possible to obtain entire specimens of many trees of the Carboniferous ; and to such an extent has the laborious and somewhat costly ])rocess been effectual, that more species of carboniferous trees are probably known in their entire forms from the Coal forma- tions of Nova Scotia than from any other part of the world. I have been amused to find that so little are experiences of this kind known to some of my confreres abroad, that they IMPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD 45 are disposed to look with scepticism on the information obtained by this laborious but certain process, and to suppose that they are being presented with imaginary *' restorations." I think it right here to copy a remark of a German botanist, who has felt himself called to criticise my work : " Dawson's description of the genus {Fsi/ophyton) rests chiefly on the impression made on him in his repeated researches," etc. " He puts us off with an account of the general idea which he has drawn from the study of them." This is the remark of a closet naturalist, with reference to the kind of work above referred to, which, of course, cannot be represented in its entirety in figures or hand specimens.^ As to the precursors of the Carboniferous flora, in default of information already acquired, I proceeded to question the Erian or Devonian rocks of Canada, in which Sir William Logan had already found remains of plants which had not, however, been studied or described. Laboriously coasting along the cliffs of Gaspe and the Baie des Chaleurs, digging into the sandstones of Eastern Maine, and studying the plants collected by the New York Survey, I began to find that there was a rich Devonian flora, and that, like that of the Carboni- ferous, it presented different stages from the base to the summit of the formation. But here a great advance was made in a somewhat unexpected way. My then young friends, the late Prof Hartt and Mr. Matthew, of St. John, had found a few remains of plants in the Devonian, or at least pre-Carboniferous beds of St. John, which were placed in my hands for descrip- tion. They were so novel and curious that inquiry was stimu- lated, and these gentlemen, with some friends of similar tastes, explored the shales exposed in the reefs near St. John, and when they found the more productive beds, broke them up by 1 Solms-Laubacli, " Fossil Botany." A pretentious book, which should not have been translated into English without thorough revision and correction. S. E. 4 46 IMPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD actual quarrying operations in such a way that they soon obtained the richest Devonian plant collections ever known. I think I may truly say that these young and enthusiastic explorers worked the St. John plant-beds in a manner pre- viously unexampled in the world. Their researches were not only thus rewarded, but incidentally they discovered the first known Devonian insects, which could not have been found by a less painstaking process, and one of them discovered what I believe to be the oldest known land shell. Still more, their studies led to the separation from the Devonian beds of the Underlying Cambrian slates, previously confounded with them ; and this, followed up by the able and earnest work of Mr. Matthew, has carried back our knowledge of the older rocks in Canada several stages, or as far as the earliest Cambrian previously known in Europe, but not before fully recognised in America, and has discovered in these old rocks the precursors of many forms of life not previously traced so far back. The moral of these statements of fact is that the imper- fections of the record will yield only to patient and painstaking work, and that much is in the power of local amateurs. I would enforce this last statement by a reference to a little research, in which I have happened to take part at a summer resort on the Lower St. Lawrence, at which I have from time to time spent a few restful vacation weeks. Little Metis is on the Quebec Group of Sir William Logan, that peculiar local representative of the lower part of the Cambro-Silurian and Upper Cambrian formations which stretches along the soutli side of the St. Lawrence all the way from Quebec to Cape Rosier, near Gaspe, a distance of five hundred miles. This great series of rocks is a jumble of deposits belonging at tliat early time to the marginal area of what is now the American continent, and indicating the action not merely of ordinary causes of aqueous deposit, but of violent volcanic ejections, IMPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD 47 accompanied perhaps by earthquake waves, and not improb- ably by the action of heavy coast ice. The result is that mud rocks now in the form of black, grey, and red shales and slates alternate with thick and irregular beds of hard sandstone, sometimes so coarse that it resembles the angular debris of the first treatment of quartz in a crusher. With these sandstones arc thick and still more irregular conglomerates formed of pebbles and boulders of all sizes, up to several feet in diameter, some of which are of older limestones containing Cambrian fossils, while others are of quartzite or of igneous or volcanic rocks. The whole formation, as presented at Metis, is of the most unpromising character as regards fossils, and after visiting the place for ten years, and taking many long walks along the shore and into the interior, and scrutinising every exposure, I had found nothing more interesting than a few fragments of graptolites, little zoophytes, ancient representatives of our sea mosses, and which are quite characteristic of several portions of the Quebec Group. With these were some marks of fucoids and tracks or burrows of worms. The explorers of the Geological Survey had been equally unsuccessful. Quite accidentally a new light broke upon these unpromis- ing rocks. My friend, Dr. Harrington, strolling one day on the shore, sat down to rest on a stone, and picked up a piece of black slate lying at his feet. He noticed on it some faintly traced lines which seemed peculiar. He put it in his pocket and showed it to me. On examination with a lens it proved to have on it a few spicules of a hexactinellid sponge— little crosses forming a sort of mesh or lattice-work similar to that which Salter had many years before found in the Cambrian rocks of Wales, and had named Protospongia — the first sjjonge. The discovery seemed worth following up, and we took an early opportunity of proceeding to the place, where, after some search, we succeeded in tracing the loose pieces to a ledge of 48 IMPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD shale on the beach, where there was a Uttle band, only about an inch thick, stored with remains of sponges, a small bivalve shell and a slender branching seaweed. This was one small layer in reefs of slate more than one hundred feet thick. We sub- sequently found two other thin layers, but less productive. Tools and workmen were procured, and we proceeded to quarry in the reef, taking out at low tide as large slabs as possible of the most productive layer, and carefully splitting these up. The results, as published in the Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada,^ show more than twelve species of siliceous sponges belonging to six genera, besides fragments indicating other species, and all of these living at one time on a very limited space of what is practically a single surface of muddy sea-bottom.^ The specimens show the parts of these ancient sponges much more perfectly than they were previously known, and indeed, enable many of them to be perfectly re- stored. They for the first time connect the modern siliceous sponges of the deep sea with those that flourished on the old sea-bottom of the early Cambro-Silurian, and thus bridge over a great gap in the history of this low form of life, showing that the principles of construction embodied in the remarkable and beautiful siliceous sponges, like Euplectella, the " "\'enus flower-basket," now dredged from the deep sea, were already perfectly carried out in this far-back beginning of life. This little discovery further indicates that portions of the older PaUieozoic sea-bottoms were as well stored with a varied sponge life as those of any part of the modern ocean. I figure ^ a number of species, remains of all of which may be gathered from a few yards of a single surfoce at Little Metis. The multitude of interesting details embodied in all this it is impossible to enter into here, but may be judged of from ' Aiiditioncil collections made in 1892 sliow two or three .idditional species, one of them the type of a new and remarkable genus. -' 1S89, section iv. p. 39. ' Frontispiece to chapter. IMPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD 49 the forms reproduced. These examples tend to show that the imperfection of the record may not depend on the record itself, but on the incompleteness of our work. We must make large allowance for imperfect collecting, and especially for the too prevalent habit of remaining content with few and incomplete specimens, and of grudging the time and labour necessary to explore thoroughly the contents of special beds, and to work out all the parts of forms found more or less in fragments. The point of all this at present is that patient work is needed to fill up the breaks in our record. A collector passing along the shore at Metis might have picked up a fragment of a fossil sj)onge, and recorded it as a fossil, or possibly described the fragment. This fact alone would have been valuable, but to make it bear its full fruit it was necessary to trace the fragment to its source, and then to spend time and labour in extracting from the stubborn rock the story it had to tell. Instances of this kind crowd on my memory as coming within my own ex- perience and observation. It is hopeful to think that the re- cord is daily becoming less imperfect ; it is stimulating to know that so much is only waiting for investigation. The his- tory never can be absolutely complete. Practically, to us it is infinite. \"et every series of facts known may be complete in itself for certain purposes, however many gaps there may be in the story. Even if we cannot find a continuous series be- tv»-een the snails of the Coal formation or the sponges of the (Quebec Group and their successors to-day, we can at least see that they are identical in plan and structure, and can note the differences of detail which fitted them for their places in the ancient or the modern world. Nor need we be too discontented if the order of succession, such as it is, does not exactly square with some theories we may have formed. Perhaps it may in the end lead us to greater and better truths. Another subject which merits attention here is the evidence which mere markings or other indications mav sometimes give 50 IMPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD as to the existence of unknown creatures, and thus may be as important to us as the footprints of Friday to Robinson Crusoe. As I have been taking Canadian examples, I may borrow one here from Mr. Matthew, of St. John, New Brunswick. He remarks in one of his papers the manner in which the Trilobites of the early Cambrian are protected with defensive spines, and asks against what enemies they were intended to guard. That there were enemies is further proved by the oc- currence of Coprolites or masses of excrement, oval or cylin- drical in form, and containing fragments of shells of Trilobites, of Pteropods (Hyolithes) and of Lingula. There must there- fore have been marine animals of considerable size, which preyed on Trilobites. Dr. Hunt and myself have recorded similar facts from the Upper-Cambrian and Canibro- Silurian of the Province of Quebec. No remains, however, are known of animals which could have produced such coprolites, except, indeed, some of the larger worms of the period, and they seem scarcely large enough. In these circumstances Mr. Matthew falls back on certain curious marks or scratches with which large surfaces of these old rocks are covered, and which he names Ctenichnites or " Comb tracks." These markings seem to indicate the rapid motion of some animal touching the bottom with fins or other organs ; and as we know no fishes in these old rocks, the question recurs, What could it have been ? From the form and character of the markings Mr. Matthew infers (i) That these animals lived in "schools," or were social in their habits ; (2) That they had a rapid, direct, darting motion ; (3) That they had three or four (at least) flexible arms ; (4) That these arms were furnished with hooks or spines; (5) That the creatures swam with an easy motion, so that sometimes the arms of one side touched the bottom, sometimes those of the other. These indications point to animals allied to the modern scjuids or cuttlefishes, and as these animals may have had no hard parts capable of pre- IMPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD 5 1 servation, except their homy beaks, nothing might remain to indicate their presence except these marks on the bottom. Mr. Matthew therefore conjectures that there may have been large cuttlefishes in the Cambrian. Since, however, these are animals cf very high rank in their class, and are not certainly known to us till a very much later period, their occurrence in these old rocks would be a very remarkable and unexpected fact. A discovery made by Walcott in the Western States since Mr. Matthew's paper was written, throws fresh light on the question. Remains of fishes have been found by the former in the Cambro Silurian rocks nearly as far back as Mr. Matthew's comb-tracks. Besides this, Pander in Russia has found in these old rocks curious teeth, which he refers conjecturally to fishes (Conodonts). Why may there not have been in the Cambrian large fishes having, like the modern sharks, cartilage or gristle instead of bone — perhaps destitute of scaler, and with small teeth which have not yet been de- tected. The fin rays of such fishes may have left the comb tracks, and in support of this I may say that there are in the Lower Carboniferous of Horton Bluff, in Nova Scotia, very similar tracks in beds holding many remains of fishes. Which- ever view we adopt we see good evidence that there were in the early Cambrian animals of higher grade than we have yet dreamt of. Observe, however, that if we could complete the record in this point it would only give us higher forms of life at an earlier time, and so push farther back their possible development from lower forms. I fear, indeed, that I can hold out little hopes to the evolutionists that a more complete geological record would help them in any way. It would possibly only render their position more difficult. But the saddest of all the possible defects of the geological record is that it may want the beginning, and be like the Bible of some of the German historical critics, from which they 52 IMPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD eliminate as mythical everything before the time of the later Hebrew kings. Our attention is forcibly called to this by the condition of the fauna of the earliest Cambrian rocks. The discoveries in these in Wales, in Norway, and in America show us that the seas of this early period swarmed with animals re- presenting all the great types of invertebrate marine life, ^^'e have here highly organized Crustaceans, Worms, Mollusks and other creatures which show us that in that early age all these distinct forms of life were as well separated from each other as in later times, that eyes of different types, jointed limbs with nerves and muscles, and a vast variety of anatomical contrivances were as highly developed as at any subsequent time.^ To a Darwinian evolutionist this means nothing less than that these creatures must have existed through countless ages of development from their imagined simple ancestral form or forms — how long it is impossible to guess, since, unless change was more speedy in the infancy of the earth, the term of ages required must have far exceeded that from the Cam- brian to the Modern. Yet, to represent all this we have abso- lutely nothing except Eozoon in its solitary grandeur, and a * Walcott and Matthew record more than i6o species of 67 genera, in- cluding Sponges, Zoophytes, Echinoderms, Brachiopods, Bivalve and Univalve shellfishes, Trilobites and other Crustaceans from the Lower Cambrian of the United States of America and Canada alone ; and these are but a portion of the inhabitants of the early Cambrian seas. There is a rich Scandinavian fauna of the same early date, and in England and Wales, Sailer, Hicks and Lap worth have described many fossils of the basal Cambrian. From year to year, also, discoveries of fossil remains are being made, both in America and Europe, in beds of older date than those previously known to be fossilifcrous. At present, however, these remains are still few and imperfectly known, and it is not in all cases certain whether the beds in which they occur are pre-Cambrian or belong to the lowest members of that great system. It is unfortunate that so many of the strata between the Laurentian and the Cambrian seem to be of a character little likely to contain fossils ; being littoral deposits produced in times of much physical disturbance. Yet there must have been con- temporaneous beds of a different character, which may yet be discovered. IMPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD 53 few other forms, possibly of Protozoa and worms. An im- aginary phylogeny of animal life from Monads to Trilobites would be something as long as the whole geological history. Yet it would be almost wholly imaginary, for the record of the rocks tells little or nothing. In face of such an imperfection as til is, geologists should surely be humble, and make confes- sion of ignorance to any extent that may be desired. Yet we may at least, with all humility and self-abasement, ask our critics how they know that this great blank really exists, and whether it may not be possible that the swarming life of the early Cambrian may, after all, have appeared suddenly on the stage in some way as yet unknown to us and to them. References : " Fossil Sponges from the Quebec Group of Little Metis, Lower St. Lawrence": Transactions Royal Society of Canada, 1890. "Resume of the Carboniferous Land Shells of North America": American Journal of Science, 18S0. "Burrows and Tracks of In- vertebrate Animals": Journal Geological Society of London, 1890. "Notes on the Pleistocene of Canada" : Canadian A^aturalisf, 1876. " Air-breathers of the Coal Paiod " : Ibid., 1863. THE HISTORY OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC. DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF TROF. JOHN THIIXIPS, OF OXFORD, One of the most able, earnest, and genial of Engllsh Geologists ; and of other Eminent Scientific Men, now passed away, who supported him as President of the British Association, at its Meeting in Birmingham, in 1865. Distribution of Land and Water — Causes of Irregu- larities OF THE Surface Crust and Interior — Position of Continents — Past History of the Atlantic — Its Relations to Life — Its Future ma w-Ki LJt VI A'^ r =" ^' J»-»^ .^-ng— .^— ^^■ CHAPTER IV. THE HISTORY OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC. I HAD the pleasure of being present at the meeting of the British Association at Birmingham, in 1865 : a meeting attended by an unusually large number of eminent geologists, under the presidency of my friend Phillips. I had the further pleasure of being his successor at the meeting in the same place, in 1886; and the subject of this chapter is that to which I directed the attention of the Association in my Presidential address. I fear it is a feeble and imperfect utter- ance compared with that which might have been given forth by any of the great men present in 1865, and who have since left us, could they have spoken with the added knowledge of the intervening twenty years. The geological history of the Atlantic appeared to be a suitable subject for a trans-Atlantic president, and to a Society which had vindicated its claim to be British in the widest sense by holding a meeting in Canada, while it was also meditating a visit to Australia — a visit not yet accomplished, but in which it may now meet with a worthy daughter in the Australian Association formed since the meeting of 1886. The subject is also one carrying our thoughts very far back in geological time, and connecting itself with some of the latest and most important discussions and discoveries in the science of the earth, furnishing, indeed, too many salient points to be profitably occupied in a single chapter. If we imagine an observer contemplating the earth from a 58 THE HISTORY OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC convenient distance in space, and scrutinizing its features as it rolls before him, we may suppose him to be struck with the fact that eleven-sixteenths of its surface are covered with water, and that the land is so unequally distributed that from one point of view he would see a hemisphere almost exclusively oceanic, while nearly the whole of the dry land is gathered in the opposite hemisphere. He might observe that large portions of the great oceanic areas of the Pacific and Antarctic Oceans are dotted with islands — like a shallow pool with stones rising above its surface — as if the general depth were small in com- parison with the area. Other portions of these oceans he might infer, from the colour of the water and the absence of islands, cover deep depressions in the earth's surface. He might also notice that a mass or belt of land surrounds each pole, and that the northern ring sends off to the southward three vast tongues of land and of mountain chains, terminating respectively in South America, South Africa, and Australia, towards which feebler and insular processes are given off by the antarctic continental mass. This, as some geographers have observed, ^ gives a rudely three-ribbed aspect to the earth, though two of the ribs are crowded together, and form the Eurasian mass or double continent, while the third is isolated in the single continent of America. He might also observe that the northern girdle is cut across, so that the Atlantic opens by a wide space into the Arctic Sea, while the Pacific is contracted toward the north, but confluent with the Antarctic Ocean. The Atlantic is also relatively deeper and less cum- bered with islands than the Pacific, which has the highest ridges near its shores, constituting what some visitors to the Pacific coast of America have not inaptly called the " back of the world," while the wider slopes face the narrower ocean. The Pacific and Atlantic, though both depressions or flat- ' Dana, " Manual of Geology," introcluclory part. Green, " Vestiges of a Molten Globe," has summed up these facts. THE HISTORY OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC 59 tenings of the earth, are, as we shall find, different in age, character, and conditions; and the Atlantic, though the smaller, is the older, and, from the geological point of view, in some respects, the more important of the two ; while, by virtue of its lower borders and gentler slope, it is, though the smaller basin, the recipient of the greater rivers, and of a proportionately great amount of the drainage of the land.^ If our imaginary observer had the means of knowing any- thing of the rock formations of the continents, he would notice that those bounding the North Atlantic are, in general, of great age — some belonging to the Laurentian system. On the other hand, he would see that many of the mountain ranges along the Pacific are comparatively new, and that modern igneous action occurs in connection with them. Thus he might see in the Atlantic, though comparatively narrow, a more ancient feature of the earth's surface ; while the Pacific belongs to more modern times. But he would note, in con- nection with this, that the oldest rocks of the great continental masses are mostly toward their northern ends ; and that the borders of the northern ring of land, and certain ridges en- tending southward from it, constitute the most ancient and permanent elevations of the earth's crust, though now greatly surpassed by mountains of more recent age nearer the equator, so that the continents of the northern hemisphere seem to have grown progressively from north to south. If the attention of our observer were directed to more modern processes, he might notice that while the antarctic continent freely discharges its burden of ice to the ocean north of it, the arctic ice has fewer outlets, and that it mainly dis- charges itself through the North Atlantic, where also the great mass of Greenland stands as a huge condenser and cooler, * Mr. Mellard Reade, in two Presidential addresses before the Geo- logical Society of Liverpool, lias illustrated tliis point and its geological consequences. S. E. S 6o THE HISTORY OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC unexampled elsewhere in the world, throwing every spring an immense quantity of ice into the North Atlantic, and more especially into its western part. On the other hand, he might learn from the driftage of weed and the colour of the water, that the present great continuous extension and form of the American continent tend to throw northward a powerful branch of the equatorial current, which, revolving around the North Atlantic, counteracts the great flow of ice which otherwise would condemn it to a perpetual winter. Further, such an observer would not fail to notice that the ridges which lie along the edges of the oceans and the ebul- litions of igneous matter which proceed, or have proceeded from them, are consequences of the settling downward of the great oceanic depressions, a settling ever intensified by their receiving more and more of deposit on their surfaces ; and that this squeezing upward of the borders of these depressions into folds has been followed or alternated with elevations and depressions without any such folding, and proceeding from other causes. On the whole, it would be apparent that these actions are more vigorous now at the margins of the Pacific area, while the Atlantic is backed by very old foldings, or by plains and slopes from which it has, so to speak, dried away without any internal movement. Thus it would appear that the Pacific is the great centre of earth-movement, while the Atlantic trench is the more potent regulator of temperature, and the ocean most likely to be severely affected in this respect by small changes of its neighbouring land. Last of all, an observer, such as I have supposed, would see that the oceans are the producers of moisture and the conveyors of heat to the northern regions of the world, and that in this respect and in the immense condensation and delivery of ice at its north end, the Atlantic is by far the more active, though the smaller of the two. So much could be learned by an extra-mundane observer • THE HISTORY OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC 6l but unless he had also enjoyed opportunities of studying the rocks of the earth in detail and close at hand, or had been favoured by some mundane friend with a perusal of " Lyell's Elements," or "Dana's Manual," he would not be able to ap- preciate as we can the changes which the Atlantic has seen in geological time, and in which it has been a main factor. Nor could he learn from such superficial observation certain secrets of the deep sea, which have been unveiled by the sounding lead, the inequalities of the ocean basin, its few profound depths, like inverted mountains or table-lands, its vast nearly flat abyssmal floor, and the sudden rise of this to the hundred fathom line, forming a terrace or shelf around the sides of the continents. These features, roughly represented in the map prefixed, he would be unable to perceive. Before leaving this broad survey, we may make one further remark. An observer, looking at the earth from without, would notice that the margins of the Atlantic and the main lines of direction of its mountain chains are north-east and south-west, and north-west and south-east, as if some early causes had determined the occurrence of elevations along great circles of the earth's surface tangent to the polar circles. We are invited by the preceding general glance at the surface of the earth to ask certain questions respecting the Atlantic. (i) What has at first determined its position and form? (2) What changes has it experienced in the lapse of geological time ? (3) What relations have these changes borne to the development of life on the land and in the water? (4) ^^'hat is its probable future ? Before attempting to answer these questions, which I shall not take up formally in succession, but rather in connection with each other, it is necessary to state, as briefly as possible, certain general conclusions respecting the interior of the earth. It is popularly supposed that we know nothing of this beyond a superficial crust perhaps averaging 50,000 to 100,000 feet in 62 THE HISTORY OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC thickness. It is true we Inave no means of exploration in the earth's interior, but the conjoined labours of physicists have now proceeded sufficiently far to throw much inferential light on the subject, and to enable us to make some general affirma- tions with certainty ; and these it is the more necessary to state distinctly, since they are often treated as mere subjects of speculation and fruitless discussion. (i) Since the dawn of geological science, it has been evi- dent that the crust on which we live must be supported on a plastic or partially liquid mass of heated rock, approximately uniform in quality under the whole of its area. This is a legitimate conclusion from the wide distribution of volcanic phenomena, and from the fact that the ejections of volcanoes, while locally of various kinds, are similar in every part of the world. It led to the old idea of a fluid interior of the earth, but this seems now generally abandoned, and this interior heated and plastic layer is regarded as merely an under-crust, resting on a solid nucleus. ^ (2) We have reason to believe, as the result of astronomical investigations, 2 that, notwithstanding the plasticity or liquidity of the under-crust, the mass of the earth — its nucleus as we may call it — is practically solid and of great density and hardness. Thus we have the apparent paradox of a solid yet fluid earth ; solid in its astronomical relations, liquid or ' I do not propose to express any definite opinion as to this question, as either conclusion will satisfy the demands of geology. It would seem, however, that astronomers now admit a slight periodical deformation of the crust. See Lord Kelvin's Anniversary Address to Royal Society, 1892. - Hopkins, Mallet, Lord Kelvin, and Prof. G. II. Darwin maintain the solidity and rigidity of the earth on astronomical grounds ; but different conclusions have been reached by Fisher, Ilennesey, Delaunay, and Airy. In America, Hunt, Barnard and Crosby, Dutton, Le Conte and Wadsworth have discussed these questions. Bonney has suggested that a mass may be slowly mobile under long-continued pressure, while rigid with reference to more sudden movements. THE HISTORY OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC 63 plastic for the purposes of volcanic action and superficial move- ments. (3) The plastic sub-crust is not in a state of dry igneous fusion, but in that condition of aqueo-igneous or hydrothermic fusion which arises from the action of heat on moist substances, and which may either be regarded as a fusion or as a species of solution at a very high temperature. This we learn from the phenomena of volcanic action, and from the composition of the volcanic and plutonic rocks, as well as from such chemical experiments as those of Daubree, and of Tilden, and Shenstone.^ It follows that water or steam, as well as rocky matter, may be ejected from the under-crust. (4) The interior sub-crust is not perfectly homogeneous, but may be roughly divided into two layers or magmas, as they have been called ; an upper, highly silicious or acidic, of low specific gravity and light-coloured, and corresponding to such kinds of plutonic and volcanic rocks as granite and trachyte ; and a lower, less silicious or more basic, more dense, and more highly charged with iron, and corresponding to such igneous rocks as the dolerites, basalts, and kindred lavas. It is interesting here to note that this conclusion, elaborated by Durocher and Von Waltershausen, and usually connected with their names, appears to have been first announced by John Phillips, in his " (Geological Manual," and as a mere common- sense deduction from the observed phenomena of volcanic action and the probable results of the gradual cooling of the earth. It receives striking confirmation from the observed succession of acidic and basic volcanic rocks of all geological periods and in all localities. It would even seem, from recent spectroscopic investigations of Lockyer, that there is evidence of a similar succession of magmas in the heavenly bodies, and the discovery by Nordenskiold of native iron in Greenland • Phil. Trans., 1SS4. Also Crosby in Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., 1883. 64 THE HISTORY OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC basalts, affords a probability that the inner magma is in part metallic, and possibly, that vast masses of unoxidised metals exist in the central portion of the earth. (5) Where rents or fissures form in the upper crust, the material of the lower crust is forced upward by the pressure of the less supported portions of the former, giving rise to volcanic phenomena either of an explosive or quiet character, as may be determined by contact with water. The underlying material may also be carried to the surface by the agency of heated water, producing those quiet discharges which Hunt has named crenitic. It is to be observed here that explosive volcanic phenomena, and the formation of cones, are, as Prestwich has well remarked, characteristic of an old and thickened crust ; quiet ejection from fissures and hydro- thermal action may have been more common in earlier periods and with a thinner over-crust. This is an important con- sideration with reference to those earlier ages referred to in chapter second. (6) The contraction of the earth's interior by cooling and by the emission of material from below the over-crust, has caused this crust to press downward, and therefore laterally, and so to effect great bends, folds, and plications ; and these, modified subsequently by surface denudation, and the piling of sediments on portions of the crust, constitute mountain chains and continental plateaus. As Hall long ago pointed out,^ such lines of folding have been produced more especially where thick sediments had been laid down on the sea-bottom, and where, in consequence, internal expansion of the crust had occurred from heating below. Thus we have here another apparent paradox, namely, that the elevations of the earth's crust occur in the places where the greatest burden of de- * Hall (American Association Address, 1S57, subsequently republislied, with additions, as "Contributions to the Geological History of the American Continent "), Mallet, Rogers, Dana, La Conte, etc. THE HISTORY OF THE NORTH ATLAxXTIC 05 tritus has been laid down upon it, and where, consequently, the crust has been softened and depressed. A\'e must beware, in this connection, of exaggerated notions of the extent of con- traction and of crumpling required to form mountains. Bonney has well shown, in lectures delivered at the London Institu- tion, that an amount of contraction, almost inappreciable in comparison with the diameter of the earth, would be sufficient ; and that, as the greatest mountain chains are less than -g^oth of the earth's radius in height, they would, on an artificial globe a foot in diameter, be no more important than the slight inequalities that might result from the paper gores overlapping each other at the edges. This thinness of the crushed crust agrees with the deductions of physical science as to the shallowness of the superficial layer of compression in a cooling globe. It is perhaps not more than five miles in thickness. A singular proof of this is seen by the extension of straight cracks filled with volcanic rock in the Laurentian districts of Canada. 1 The beds of gneiss and associated rocks are folded and crumpled in a most complex manner, yet they are crossed by these faults, as a crack in a board may tear a sheet of paper or a thin veneer glued on it. We. thus see that the crumpled Laurentian crust was very thin, while the uncrushed sub-crust determined the line of fracture. (7) The crushing and sliding of the over-crust implied in these movements raise some serious questions of a physical character. One of these relates to the rapidity or slowness of such movements, and the consequent degree of intensity of the heat developed, as a possible cause of metamorphism of rocks. Another has reference to the possibihty of changes in the equilibrium of the earth itself, as resulting from local collapse and ridging. These questions in connection with the * As, for instance, the great dyke running nearly in a straiglit line from near .St. Jerome along the Ottawa to Templeton, on the Ottawa, and be- yond, a distance of more than a hundred miles. 66 THE HISTORY OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC present dissociation of the axis of rotation from the magnetic poles, and with changes of chmate, have attracted some atten- tion,^ and probably deserve further consideration on the part of physicists. In so far as geological evidence is concerned, it would seem that the general association of crumpling with metamorphism indicates a certain rapidity in the process of mountain-making, and consequent development of heat ; and the arrangement of the older rocks around the Arctic basin for- bids us from assuming any extensive movement of the axis of rotation, though it does not exclude changes to a limited extent. (8) It appears from the above that mountains and conti- nental elevations may be of three kinds. (^7) They may con- sist of material thrown out of volcanic rents, like earth out of a mole burrow. Mountains like ^'esuvius and Aiina are of this kind. (/^) They may be parts of wide ridges or chains variously cut and modified by rains and rivers. The Lebanon and the Catskill Mountains are cases in point, {c) They may be lines of crumpling by lateral pressure. The greatest moun- tains, like the Cordillera, the Alps, and the Appalachians are of this kind, and such mountains may represent lateral pressure occurring at various times, and whose results have been greatly modified subsequently. I wish to formulate tliese princi|)les as distinctly as possible, and as the result of all the long series of observations, calcu- lations, and discussions since the time of Werner and Hutlon, and in which a vast number of able physicists and naturalists have borne a part, because they may be considered as certain deductions from our actual knowledge, and because they lie at the foundation of a rational physical geology. We may roughly popularise these deductions by comparing the earth to a drupe or stone-fruit, sucli as a i)lum or peach ' See leceiit papers of Olillinm ainl ]"islicr, in Gori U. S. Gcol. SufZ'cy, 1882-83. THE HISTORY OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC 89 bottoms of Norway and Scotland, on the top of Moel Tryfaen, in Wales, and at similar great heights on the hills of America, many of which can be traced back to early Tertiary times, and can be found to have extended themselves over all the seas of the northern hemisphere. They apply in like manner to the ferns, the conifers, and the broad-leaved trees, many of which we can now trace without specific change to the Eocene and Cretaceous. They all show that the forms of living things are more stable than the lands and seas in which they live. If we were to adopt some of the modern ideas of evolution, we might cut the Gordian knot by supposing that, as like causes produce like effects, these types of life have originated more than once in geological time, and need not be genetically connected with each other. But while evolutionists repudiate such an appli- cation of their doctrine, however natural and rational, it would seem that nature still more strongly repudiates it, and will not allow us to assume more than one origin for one species. Thus the great question of geographical distribution remains in all its force ; and. by still another of our geological paradoxes, mountains become ephemeral things in comparison with the delicate herbage which covers them, and seas are in their pre- sent extent but of yesterday, when compared with the minute and feeble organisms that creep on their sands or swim in their waters. The question remains : Has the Atlantic achieved its des- tiny and finished its course, or are there other changes in store for it in the future ? The earth's crust is now thicker and stronger than ever before, and its great ribs of crushed and folded rock are more firm and rigid than in any previous period. The stupendous volcanic phenomena manifested in Mesozoic and early Tertiary times along the borders of the Atlantic have apparently died out. These facts are in so far guarantees of permanence. On the other hand, it is known that move- ments of elevation, along with local depression, are in progress 90 THE HISTORY OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC in the Arctic regions, and a great weight of new sediment is being deposited along the borders of the Atlantic, especially on its western side ; and this is not improbably connected with the earthquake shocks and slight movements of depression which have occurred in North America. It is possible that these slight and secular movements may go on uninterruptedly, or with occasional paroxysmal disturbances, until considerable changes are produced. It is possible, on the other hand, that after the long period of quiescence which has elapsed, there may be a new settlement of the ocean bed, accompanied with foldings of the crust, es- pecially on the western side of the Atlantic, and possibly with renewed volcanic activity on its eastern margin. In either case, a long time relatively to our limited human chronology may intervene before the occurrence of any marked change. On the whole, the experience of the past would lead us to ex- pect movements and eruptive discharges in the Pacific rather than in the Atlantic area. It is therefore not unlikely that the Atlantic may remain undisturbed, unless secondarily and in- directly, until after the Pacific area shall have attained to a greater degree of quiescence than at present. But this subject is one too much involved in uncertainty to warrant us in follow- ing it farther. In the meantime the Atlantic is to us a practically permanent ocean, varying only its tides, its currents, and its winds, which science has already reduced to definite laws, so that we can use if we cannot regulate them. It is ours to take advantage of this precious time of quietude, and to extend the blessings of science and of our Christian civilisation from shore to shore, until there shall be no more sea, not in the sense of that final drying-up of old ocean to which some physicists look forward, but in the higher sense of its ceasing to be the emblem of un- rest and disturbance, and the cause of isolation. I must now close this chapter with a short statement of some THE HISTORY OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC 9 1 general truths which I have had in view in directing attention to the geological development of the Atlantic. We cannot, I think, consider the topics to which I have referred with- out perceiving that the history of ocean and continent is an example of progressive design, quite as much as that of living beings. Nor can we fail to see that, while in some important directions we have penetrated the great secret of nature, in reference to the general plan and structure of the earth and its w^aters, and the changes through which they have passed, we have still very much to learn, and perhaps quite as much to unlearn, and that the future holds out to us and to our suc- cessors higher, grander, and clearer conceptions than those to which we have yet attained. The vastness and the might of ocean and the manner in which it cherishes the feeblest and most fragile beings, alike speak to us of Him who holds it in the hollow of His hand, and gave to it of old its boundaries and its laws ; but its teaching ascends to a higher tone when we consider its origin and history, and the manner in which it has been made to build up continents and mountain-chains, and, at the same time, to nourish and sustain the teeming life of sea and land. References : — Presidential Address to the British Association for tlie Advancement of Science, Birmingham, 1SS6. " Geology of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Prince Edward Island." Fourth Edition, London, 1S91. S. E. THE DAWX OF LIFE. DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF SIR WILLIAM E. LOGAX, The UNWEARIED Explorer of the Laurentlvn Rocks, AND THE Founder OF THE Geological Survey of Canada. What are the Oldest Rocks, and where? — Conditions OF their Formation — Indications of Life— What its probable" Nature XATURE-rRiXT 01" Eozoox, showiiig laiiiinateJ, acervuline, and fragniental portions. This is printed from an electrotype taken from an etched slab of Eozoon, and not touched with a graver except to remedy some accidental flaws in the plate. Tlie diagonal white line marks the course of a calcite vein. CHAPTER V. THE DAWN OF LIFE DO we know the first animal ? Can we name it, explain its structure, and state its relations to its successors ? Can we do this by inference from the succeeding types of being ; and if so, do our anticipations agree with any actual reality disinterred from the earth's crust ? If we could do this , either by inference or actual discovery, how strange it would be to know that we had before us even the remains of the first creature that could feel or will, and could place itself in vital relation with the great powers of inanimate nature. If we believe in a Creator, we shall feel it a solemn thing to have access to the first creature into which He breathed the breath of life. If we hold that all things have been evolved from collision of dead forces, then the first molecules of matter which took upon themselves the responsibility of living, and, aiming at the enjoyment of happiness, subjected themselves to the dread alternatives of pain and mortality, must surely evoke from us that filial reverence which we owe to the authors of our own being ; if they do not involuntarily draw forth even a superstitious adoration. The veneration of the old Egyptian for his sacred animals would be a comparatively reasonable idolatry, if we could imagine any of these animals to have been the first that emerged from the domain of dead matter, and the first link in a reproductive chain of being that produced all the population of the world. Independently of any such hypotheses, all students of nature must regard with surpassing 96 THE DAWN OF LIFE interest the first bright streaks of h'ght that break on the long reign of primeval night and death, and presage the busy day of teeming animal existence. No wonder, then, that geologists have long and earnestly groped in the rocky archives of the earth in search of some record of this patriarch of the animal kingdom. But after long and patient research there still remained a large residuum of the oldest rocks destitute of all traces of living beings, and designated by the hopeless name " Azoic," — the formations destitute of remains of life, the stony records of a lifeless world. So the matter remained till the Laurentian rocks of Canada, lying at the base of these old Azoic formations, afforded forms believed to be of organic origin. The dis- covery was hailed with enthusiasm by those wlio had been prepared by previous study to receive it. It was regarded with feeble and not very intelligent faith by many more, and was met with half-concealed or open scepticism by others. It pro- duced a copious crop of descriptive and controversial literature, but for the most part technical, and confined to scientific trans- actions and periodicals, read by very few except specialists. Thus, few even of geological and biological students have clear ideas of the real nature and mode of occurrence of these ancient organisms, if organisms they are, and of their relations to better known forms of life ; while the crudest and most in- accurate ideas have been current in lectures and popular books, and even in text-books. -This state of things has long ceased to be desirable in the interests of science, since the settlement of the questions raised is in the highest degree important to the history of life. We cannot, it is true, aflirm that Eo/.oon is in reality the long- sought prototype of animal existence ; but it was for us, at least until recently, the last organic foothold, on which we can poise ourselves, that we may look back into the abyss of the infi- nite past, and forward to the long and varied progress of life in THE DAWN OF LIFE 9/ geological time. Now, however, we have announcements to be referred to in the sequel of other organisms discovered in the so-called Archaean rocks ; and it is not improbable that these will rapidly increase. The discussion of its claims have also raised questions and introduced new points, certain, if properly entered into, to be fruitful of interesting and valuable thought, and to form a good introduction to the history of life in con- nection with geology. As we descend in depth and time into the earth's crust, after passing through nearly all the vast series of strata consti- tuting the monuments of geological history, we at length reach the Eozoic or Laurentian rocks,' deepest and oldest of all the formations known to the geologist, and more thoroughly altered or metamorphosed by heat and heated moisture than any others. These rocks, at one time known as Azoic, being sup- posed destitute of all remains of living things, but now more properly Eozoic, are those in which the first bright streaks of the dawn of life make their appearance. The name I.aurentian, given originally to the Canadian develoi)ment of these rocks by Sir William Logan, but now applied to them throughout the world, is derived from a range of hills lying north of the St. Lawrence valley, which the old French geographers named the Laurentides. In these hills the harder rocks of this old formation rise to considerable heights, and form the highlands separating the St. Lawrence valley from the great plain fronting on Hudson's Bay and the Arctic Sea. At first sight it may seem strange that rocks so ancient should anywhere appear at the surface, especially on the tops of hills ; but this is a necessary result of the mode of formation of our continents. The most ancient sediments deposited in the sea were those first elevated into land, and first altered and hardened. Upheaved in the folding of the earth's crust into high and rugged ridges, they have either re- ^ Otherwise named "Archiran." 98 THE DAWN OF LIFE mained uncovered with newer sediments, or have had such as were deposited on them washed away ; and being of a hard and resisting nature, they have remained comparatively unworn when rocks much more modern have been swept off by denud- ing agencies.^ But the exposure of the old Laurentian skeleton of mother earth is not confined to the Laurentide Hills, though these have given the formation its name. The same ancient rocks appear in the Adirondack mountains of New York, and in the patches which at lower levels protrude from beneath the newer formations along the American coast from Newfoundland to Maryland. The older gneisses of Norway, Sweden, and the Hebrides, of Bavaria and Bohemia, of Egypt, Abyssinia and Arabia, belong to the same age, and it is not unlikely that similar rocks in many other parts of the old continent will be found to be of as great antiquity. In no part of the world, however, are the Laurentian rocks more extensively distributed or better known than in Canada ; and to this as the grandest and most instructive development of them we may more especially devote our attention. The Laurentian rocks, associated with another series only a little younger, the Huronian, form a great belt of broken and hilly country, extending from Labrador across the north of Canada to Lake Superior, and thence bending northward to the Arctic Sea. Everywhere on the lower St. Lawrence they appear as ranges of billowy rounded ridges on the north side of the river, and as viewed from the water or the southern shore, especially when sunset deepens their tints to blue and violet, they present a grand and massive appearance, which, in the eye of the geologist, who knows that they have endured the battles and the storms of time longer than any other moun- ' This iinplics tlie permanence of continents in llieir main features, a doctrine the writer lias maintained for tliirty years, and wliich is discussed elsewhere. THE DAWN OF LIFE 99 tains, invests them with the dignity which their mere elevation would fail to give. (Fig. i.) In the isolated mass of the Adirondacks, south of the Canadian frontier, they rise to a still greater elevation, and form an imposing mountain group, almost equal in height to their somewhat more modern rivals, the White Mountains, which face them on the opposite side of Lake Champlain. The grandeur of the old Laurentian ranges is, however, best displayed where they have been cut across by the great trans- verse gorge of the Saguenay, and where the magnificent preci- pices, known as Capes Trinity and Eternity, look down from their elevation of 1,500 feet on the fiord, which at their feet is more than 100 fathoms deep. The name Eternity applied to such a mass is geologically scarcely a misnomer, for it dates back to the very dawn of geological time, and is of hoar antiquity in comparison with such upstart ranges as the Andes and the Alps. (See Frontispiece.) On a nearer acquaintance, the Laurentian country appears as a broken and hilly upland and highland district, clad in its pristine state with magnificent forests, but affording few attrac- tions to the agriculturist, except in the valleys, which follow the lines of its softer beds, while it is a favourite region for the angler, the hunter, and the lumberman. ]\Lany of the Lauren- tian townships of Canada are, however, already extensively settled, and the traveller may pass through a succession of more or less cultivated valleys, bounded by rocks or wooded hills and crags, and diversified by running streams and roman- tic lakes and ponds, constituting a country always picturesque and often beautiful, and rearing a strong and hardy population. To the geologist it presents in the main immensely thick beds of gneiss, bedded diorite and quartzite, and similar crystalline rocks, contorted in the most remarkable manner, so that if they could be flattened out they would serve as a skin much too large for mother earth in her present state, so much has THE DAWX OF LIfE .\ir.M. lit I 1 "^i. '''y'm Z I ,;i.l THE DAWN OF LIFE lOI she shmnk and vnnkled ance those youthful days when the Lanroitian roc^ woe her outer covering. I cannot describe such locks, but their names, as givoi in the section. Fig. 2. win teQ something to those who have any knowledge of the older crystalline materials of the earth s crusL To those who have not, I would advise a visit to some cUff on the lower Sl Lawrence^ or the Hebridean coasts, or the shore of Norway, whoe the old hard crystalline and gnaried beds {nresent their sharp edges to the ever raging sea, and show tfadr endless alternations of various kinds and colours of strata, often diversified with veins and nests of crystalline minerals. He who has seen and studied such a section of Laurentian rock carmot forget it The elaborate stradgrai^cal work of Sir WllUam Logan has proved that these old ajstalUne rocks are bedded or stratified, and that they must have been deposited in succession by some process of aqueous action. They have, however, through geological ages of vast duration been subjected to pressure and chemical action, which have, as stated in a pre- vious chapter, much modified their struc- ture, while it is also certain that they must have differed originally 6rom the sands, clays and other materials laid down in the sea in later times. 102 THE DAWN OF LIFE It is interesting to notice here that the Laurentian rocks thus interpreted show that the oldest known portions of our continents were formed in the waters. They are oceanic sedi- ments deposited perhaps when there was no dry land, or very little, and that little unknown to us, except in so far as its debris may have entered into the composition of the Lauren- tian rocks themselves. Thus the earliest condition of the earth known to the geologist is one in which old ocean was already dominant on its surface ; and any previous condition when the surface was heated, and the water constituted an abyss of vapours enveloping its surface, or any still earlier con- dition in which the earth was gaseous or vaporous, is a matter of mere inference, not of actual observation. The formless and void chaos is a deduction of chemical and physical prin- ciples, not a fact observed by the geologist. Still we know, from the great dykes and masses of igneous or molten rock which traverse the Laurentian beds, that even at that early period there were deep-seated fires beneath the crust ; and it is quite possible that volcanic agencies then manifested them- selves, not only with quite as great intensity, but also in the same manner, as at subsequent times. It is thus not unlikeh- that much of the land undergoing waste in the earlier Lauren- tian time was of the same nature with recent volcanic ejections, and that it formed groups of islands in an otherwise boundless ocean. However this may be, the distribution and extent of these pre-Laurentian lands is, and probably ever must be, unknown to us ; for it was only after the Laurentian rocks had been deposited, and after the shrinkage and deformation of the earth's crust in subsecjuent times had bent and contorted them, that the foundations of the continents were laid. The rude sketch map of America given in Fig. 3 will show this, and will also show that the old Laurentian mountains mark out the future form of the American continent. THE DAWN OF LIFE 103 Some subsequent writers have, it is true, treated with dis- behef Logan's great discoveries ; but no competent geologist who has traced the regularly bedded limestones and other rocks of his original fields of investigation could continue to doubt. On this subject I may quote from my friend Dr. Bonney, one of the most judicious of the builders who under- take hypothetically to lay the foundation stones of the earth's -Tlie Laurentian Nucleus of th ilLl- I Fig. 3.- crust for our enlightenment in those later days. In an address delivered at the Bath meeting of the British Association he says : — "The first deposits on the solidified crust of the earth would obviously be igneous. As water condensed from the atmo- sphere on the cooling surface, aqueous waste or condensation would begin, and stratified deposits in the ocean would become 104 'THE DAWN OF LIFE possible in addition to detrital volcanic material. But at that time the crust itself, and even later stratified deposits would often be kept for a considerable period at a high temperature. Thus, not only rocks of igneous origin (including volcanic ashes) would predominate in the lowest foundation stones, but also secondary changes would occur more readily, and even the sediments or precipitates might be greatly modified. As time went on, true sediments would predominate over volcanic materials, and these would be less and less affected by chemical changes, and would more and more retain their original char- acter. Thus we should expect that as we retraced the earth's course through ' the corridor of time ' we should arrive at rocks which, though crystalline in structure, were evidently in great part sedimentary in origin, and should behind them find rocks of more coarsely crystalline texture and more dubious character, which, however, probably were in part of a like origin, and should at last reach coarsely crystalline rocks, in which, while occasional sediments would be possible, the majority were originally igneous, though modified at a very early period of their history. This corresponds with what we find in nature, when we apply, cautiously and tentatively, the principles of interpretation which guide us in stratigraphical geology." ^ This expresses very well the general result of the patient stratigraphical and chemical labours of Logan and Sterry Hunt, as applied to the vast areas of old crystalline stratified rocks in Canada, and which I have had abundant opportunities to verify on the ground. Under the undoubted Cambrian beds of Canada lies the Huronian, a formation largely of hardened sands, clays and gravels, now forming sandstones, slates, and conglomerates, but with great beds of igneous or volcanic rock, and hardened and altered ash beds. Under ^ "The Foundation Stones of the Earth's Ciust," 1888. The extract is slightly condensed. THE DAWN OF LIFE I05 this, in the upper portion of the Laurentian, we have regularly bedded rocks, quartzites, limestones, and quartzose, and gra- phitic and ferruginous gneisses, evidently altered aqueous sediments ; but intermixed with other rocks, as diorites and hornblendic gneisses, which are plainly of different origin. Lastly, on the bottom of all, we have nothing but coarse crystalline gneiss, representing perhaps the earliest crust of a cooling globe. Broadly, and without entering into details or theoretical views as to the precise causes of formation and alteration of these rocks, this is the structure of the Archasan or Eozoic system in Canada ; and it corresponds with that of the basement or foundation stones of our continents in every country that I have been able to visit, or of which T have trustworthy accounts. In the lower or fundamental gneiss, and in the igneous beds which succeed it, we need not look for any indications of living beings; but so soon as the sea began to deposit sand, mud, limestone, iron ore, carbon, there would be nothing to exclude the presence of some forms of marine life ; while, as land must have already existed, there would be a possibility of life on it. This, therefore, we may begin to look for so soon as we ascend to those beds of the Laurentian in, which lime- stone, iron ore, and quartzite appear ; and it is precisely at this point in the Laurentian of Canada that indications of life are supposed to have been found. Certain it is that if we cannot find some sign of life in the Laurentian or Huronian, we shall have to face as the beginnings of life the swarms of marine creatures that appear all over the globe at once, in the early Cambrian age. Is it likely, then, that such rocks should afford any traces of living beings, even if any such existed when they were formed? Geologists who had traced organic remains back to the lowest Cambrian might hope for such remains, even in the Lauren- tian ; but they long looked in vain for their actual discovery. s. E. 8 I06 THE DAWN OF LIFE Still, as astronomers have suspected the existence of unknown planets from observing perturbations not accounted for, and as voyagers have suspected the approach to unknown regions by the appearance of floating wood or stray land birds, antici- pations of such discoveries have been entertained and ex- pressed from time to time. Lyell, Dana, and Dr. Sterry Hunt more especially have committed themselves to such specula- tions. The reasons assigned may be stated thus : — Assuming the Laurentian rocks to be altered sediments, tliey must, from their great extent, have been deposited in the ocean ; and if there had been no living creatures in the waters, we have no reason to believe that they would have consisted of anything more than such sandy and muddy debris as may be washed away from wasting rocks originally of igneous origin. But the Laurentian beds contain other materials than these. No formations of any geological age include thicker or more extensive limestones. One of the beds measured by the officers of the Geological Survey is stated to be 1,500 feet in thickness, another is 1,250 feet thick, and a third, 750 feet; making an aggregate of 3,500 feet.^ These beds may be traced, with more or less interruption, for hundreds of miles. What- ever the origin of such limestones, it is plain that they indicate causes equal in extent, and comparable in power and duration, with those which have produced the greatest limestones of the later geological periods. Now, in later formations, limestone is usually an organic rock, accumulated by the slow gathering from the sea-water, or its plants, of calcareous matter, by corals, foraminifera, or shell fish, and the deposition of their skeletons, either entire or in fragments, in the sea bottom. The most friable chalk and the most crystalline limestones have alike been formed in this way. We know of no reason why it should be different in the Laurentian period. When, * Logan : "Geology of Canada," p. 45. THE DAWN OF LIFE I07 therefore, we find great and conformable beds of limestone, such as those described by Sir William Logan in the Lauren- tian of Canada, we naturally imagine a quiet sea bottom, in which multitudes of animals of humble organization were accumulating limestone in their hard parts, and depositing this in gradually increasing thickness from age to age. Any attempts to account otherwise for these thick and greatly extended beds, regularly interstratified with other deposits, have so far been failures, and have arisen either from a want of comprehension of the nature and magnitude of the appear- ances to be explained, or from the error of mistaking the true bedded limestones for veins of calcareous spar. The Laurentian rocks contain great quantities of carbon, in the form of graphite or plumbago. This does not occur wholly, or even principally, in veins or fissures, but in the sub- stance of the limestone and gneiss, and in regular layers. So abundant is it, that I have estimated the amount of carbon in one division of the Lower Laurentian of the Ottawa district at an aggregate thickness of not less than twenty to thirty feet, an amount comparable with that in the true coal formation itself Now we know of no agency existing in present or in past geological time capable of deoxidizing carbonic acid, and fixing its carbon as an ingredient in permanent rocks, except vegetable life. Unless, therefore, we suppose that there existed in the Laurentian age a vast abundance of vegetation, either in the sea or on the land, we have no means of explaining the Laurentian graphite. The Laurentian formation contains great beds of oxide of iron, sometimes seventy feet in thickness. Here, again, we have an evidence of organic action ; for it is the deoxidizing power of vegetable matter which has in all the later formations been the efficient cause in producing bedded deposits of iron. This is the case in modern bog and lake ores, in the clay iron- stones of the coal measures, and apparently, also, in the great Io8 THE DAWN OF LIFE ore beds of the Silurian rocks. May not similar causes have been at work in the Laurentian period ? Any one of these reasons might, in itself, be held insufficient to prove so great and, at first sight, unlikely a conclusion as that of the existence of abundant animal and vegetable life in the Laurentian ; but the concurrence of the whole in a series of deposits unquestionably marine, forms a chain of evidence so powerful that it might command belief even if no fragment of any organic and living form or structure had ever been recognised in these ancient rocks. Such was the condition of the matter until the existence of supposed organic remains was announced by Sir W. Logan, at the American Association for the Advancement of Science, in Springfield, in 1859 ; and we may now proceed to narrate the manner of this discovery, and how it has been followed up. Before doing so, however, let us visit Eozoon in one of its haunts among the Laurentian Hills. One of the most noted repositories of its remains is the great Grenville band of lime- stone; and one of the most fruitful localities is at a place called Cote St. Pierre on this band. Leaving the train at Papineauville, we find ourselves on the Laurentian rocks, and pass over one of the great bands of gneiss for about twelve miles, to the village of St. Andre Avelin. On the road we see on either hand abrupt rocky ridges, partially clad with forest, and sometimes showing on their flanks the stratification of the gneiss in very distinct parallel bands, often contorted, as if the rocks, when soft, had been wrung as a washerwoman wrings clothes. Between the hills are little irregular valleys, from which the wheat and oats have just been reaped, and the tall Indian corn and yellow pumpkins are still standing in the fields. Where not cultivated, the land is covered with a rich second growth of young maples, birches, and oaks, among which still stand the stumps and tall scathed trunks of enor- mous pines, which constituted the original forest. Half way THE DAWN OF LIFE IO9 we cross the Nation River, a stream nearly as large as the Tweed, flowing placidly between wooded banks, which are mirrored in its surface ; but in the distance we can hear the roar of its rapids, dreaded by lumberers in their spring drivings of logs. Arrived at St. Andre, we find a wider valley, the indication of the change to the limestone band, and along this, with the gneiss hills still in view on either hand, and often encroaching on the road, we drive for five miles more to Cote St. Pierre. At this place the lowest depression of the valley is occupied by a little pond, and, hard by, the limestone, pro- FiG. 4. — Attiuule of Limestone .it .St. Pierre, (a) Gneiss band in the Limestone. (/') Limestone with Lozoon. {c) Dioiite and Gneiss. tected by a ridge of gneiss, rises in an abrupt wooded bank by the roadside, and a little farther forms a bare white promontory, projecting into the fields. The limestone is here highly inclined and nmch contorted, and in all the excavations a thickness of about 100 feet of it may be exposed. It is white and crystalline, varying much, however, in coarseness in different bands. It is in some layers pure and white ; in others it is traversed by many grey layers of gneissose and other matter, or by irregular bands and nodules of pyroxene and serpentine, and it contains subordinate beds of dolomite. In one layer only, and this but a few feet thick, does the Eozoon occur in abundance in a perfect state, though no THE DAWN OF LIFE fragments and imperfectly preserved specimens abound in other parts of the bed. It is a great mistake to suppose that it constitutes whole beds of rock in an uninterrupted mass. Its true mode of occurrence is best seen on the weathered sur- faces of the rock, where the serpentinous specimens project in irregular patches of various sizes, sometimes twisted by the contortion of the beds, but often too small to suffer in this way. On such surfaces the projecting patches of the fossil exhibit laminae of serpentine so precisely like the Stromatopone of the Silurian rocks, that any collector would pounce upon them at once as fossils. In some places these small weathered speci- mens can be easily chipped off from the crumbling surface of the limestone ; and it is perhaps to be regretted that they have not been more extensively shown to palaeontologists, with the cut slices which to many of them are so problematical. One of the original specimens, brought from the Calumet, and now in the Museum of the Geological Survey of Canada, was of this kind, and much finer specimens from Cote St. Pierre are now in that collection and in my own. A very fine example is represented on the plate facing this chapter, which is taken from an original photograph. In some of the layers are found other and more minute vesicular forms, which may be organic, and these, together with fragmental remains, as ingredients in the limestone, will be discussed in the sequel. We may merely notice here that the most abundant layer of P^ozoon at this place occurs near the base of the great limestone band, and that the upper layers, in so far as seen, are less rich in it. Further, there is no necessary connection between Eozoon and the occurrence of serpentine, for there are many layers full of bands and lenticular masses of that mineral without any Eozoon except occasional fragments, while the fossil is some- times partially mineralised with pyroxene, dolomite, or common limestone. The section in Fig. 4 will serve to show the atti- tude of the limestone at this place, while the more general THE DAWN OF LIFE I I I section, Fig. 2, page loi, taken from Sir William Logan, shows its relation to the other Laurentian rocks. We may now notice the manner in which the specimens discovered in this and other places in the Laurentian country came to be regarded as organic. It is a trite remark that most discoveries are made, not by one person, but by the joint exertions of many, and that they have their preparations made often long before they actually appear. For this reason I may be excused here for introducing some personal details in relation to the discovery of Eozoon, and which are indeed necessary in vindication of its claims. Li this case the stable foundations were laid years before the discovery of Eozoon, by the careful surveys made by Sir William Logan and his assistants, and the chemical examination of the rocks and minerals by Dr. Sterry Hunt, which established beyond all doubt the great age and truly bedded character of the Lauren- tian rocks and their probable original nature, and the changes which they have experienced in the course of geological time. On the other hand, Dr. Carpenter and others in England were examining the structure of the shells of the humbler inhabitants of the modern ocean, and the manner in which the pores of their skeletons become infiltrated with mineral matter when deposited in the sea bottom. These laborious and apparently dissimilar branches of scientific inquiry were destined to be united by a series of happy discoveries, made not fortuitously but by painstaking and intelligent observers. The discovery of the most ancient fossil was thus not the chance picking up of a rare and curious specimen. It was not likely to be found in this way ; and if so found, it would have remained unnoticed and of no scientific value, but for the accumulated stores of zoological and palseontological knowledge, and the surveys previously made, whereby the age and distribution of the Laurentian rocks and the chemical conditions of their deposi- tion and metamorphism were ascertained. 112 THE DAWN OF LIFE The first specimens of Eozoon ever procured, in so far as known, were collected at Burgess, in Ontario, by a veteran Canadi.ui mineralogist, Dr. Wilson, of Perth, and were sent to Sir William Logan as mineral specimens. Their chief interest at that time lay in the fact that certain laminae of a dark green mineral present in the specimens were found, on analysis by Dr. Hunt, to be composed of a new hydrous silicate, allied to serpen- tine, and which he named loganite. The form of this mineral was not suspected to be of organic origin. Some years after, in 1858, other specimens, differently mineralized with the minerals serpentine and pyroxene, were found by Mr. J. McMullen, an explorer in the service of the Geological Survey, in the limestone of the Grand Calumet on the River Ottawa. These seem to have at once struck Sir W. E. Logan as resembling the Silurian fossils known as Stroniatopora, and he showed them to Mr. Billings, the paleontologist of the survey, and to the writer, with this suggestion, confirming it with the sagacious consideration that inasmuch as the Ottawa and Burgess speci- mens were mineralized by different substances, yet were alike in form, there was little probability that they were merely mineral or concretionary. Mr. Billings was naturally unwilling to risk his reputation in affirming the organic nature of such specimens ; and my own suggestion was that they should be sliced, and examined microscopically, and that if fossils, as they presented merely concentric laminoi and no cells, they would probably prove to be protozoa rather than corals. A few slices were accordingly made, but no definite structure could be detected. Nevertheless, Sir William Logan took some of the specimens to the meeting of the American Association at Springfield, in 1859, and exhibited them as possibly Laurentian fossils ; but the announcement was evidently received with some incredulity. Li 1862 they were exhibited by Sir William to some geological friends in London, but he remarks that "few seemed disposed to believe in their organic character, Fig. I. FjG. 2. Fk Fig. I. Small aPLCi.MEN of Eozoon, weathered out, natural size, from a photograph. Fig. 2. Canal System of Eozoon injected with serpentine (magni- fied). Fig. 3. Very fine Canals and Tukuli filled with Dolumite (magni- fied). (From Micro-photographs.-) THE DAWN OF LIFE 113 with the exception of my friend, Professor Ramsay." In 1863 the general Report of the Geological Survey, summing up its P"iG. 5. — Weathered Specimen of Eozoon from the Calumet. (Collected by Mr. McMullen.) \ MSSS1''V'1:.\ Fu;. 6. — Cross Section of the Specimen represented in Fig. 8. The dark parts are the lamince of calcareous matter converging to the outer surface. 114 THE DAWN OF LIFE work to that time, was published, under the name of the " Geology of Canada," and in this, at page 49, will be found two figures of one of the Calumet specimens, here reproduced, and which, though unaccompanied with any specific name or technical description, were referred to as probably Laurentian fossils. (Figs. 5 and 6.) About this time Dr. Hunt happened to mention to me, in connection with a paper on the mineralization of fossils which he was preparing, that he proposed to notice the mode of preservation of certain fossil woods and other things with which I was familiar, and that he would show me the paper in proof, in order that I might give him any suggestions that occurred to me. On reading it, I observed, among other things, that he alluded to the supposed Laurentian fossils, under the impression that the organic part was represented by the serpentine or loganite, and that the calcareous matter was the filling of the chambers. I took exception to this, stating that though in the slices I had examined no structure was apparent, still my impression was that the calcareous matter was the fossil, and the serpentine or loganite the filling. He said- — " In that case, would it not be well to re-examine the specimens, and try to discover which view is correct ? " He mentioned, at the same time, that Sir ^\"illiam had recently shown him some new and beautiful specimens collected by Mr. Lowe, one of the explorers on the staff of the Survey, from a third locality, at Grenville, on the Ottawa. It was supposed that these might throw further light on the subject ; and accordingly Dr. Hunt suggested to Sir ^\'illiam to have additional slices of these new specimens made by Mr. Weston, of the Survey, whose skill as a preparer of these and other fossils has often done good service to science. A few days thereafter some slices were sent to me, and were at once put under the microscope. I was delighted to find in one of the first specimens examined a beautiful group of tubuli penetrating THE DAWN OF LIFE II5 one of the calcite layers. Here was evidence, not only that the calcite layers represented the true skeleton of the fossil, but also of its affinities with the foraminifera, whose tubulated supplemental skeleton, as described and figured by Dr. Car- penter, and represented in specimens in my collection, pre- sented by him, was apparently of the same type with that preserved in the canals of these ancient fossils. Hg. 7 is an accurate representation of the group of canals first detected by me. } I ( ( Fig. 7. — Group of Canals in the Supplemental Skeleton of Eozoon. Taken from the specimen in which they were first recognised. Magnified. (Camera tracing by Mr. H. S. Smith.) On showing the structures discovered to Sir William Logan, he entered into the matter with enthusiasm, and had a great number of slices, as well as decalcified specimens, prepared, which were placed in my hands for examination. Feeling that the discovery was most important, but that it would be met with determined scepticism by a great many geologists, I was not content with examining the typical speci- .mens of Eozoon, but had slices prepared pf every variety of Il6 THE DAWN OF LIFE Laurentian limestone, of altered limestones from the Primordial and Silurian, and of serpentine marbles of all the varieties furnished by our collections. They were examined with ordi- nary and polarized light, and with every variety of illumination. They were also examined as decalcified specimens, after the carbonate of lime had been removed by acids. An extensive series of notes and camera tracings were made of all the appearances observed ; and of some of the more important structures beautiful drawings were executed by the late Mr. H. S. Smith, the then palteontological draughtsman of the Survey. The result of the whole investigation was a firm con- viction that the structure was organic and foraminiferal, and that it could be distinguished from any merely mineral or crystalline forms occurring in these or other limestones. At this stage of the matter, and after exhibiting to Sir William all the characteristic appearances, in comparison with such concretionary, dendritic and crystalline structures as most resembled them, and also with the structure of recent and fossil Foraminifera, I suggested that the further prosecution of the matter should be handed over to Mr. Billings, as paleontologist of the Survey. I was engaged in other re- searches, not connected with the Survey or with this particular department, and I knew that no little labour must be devoted to the work and to its publication, and that some controversy might be expected. Mr. Billings, however, with his character- istic caution and modesty, declined. His hands were full of other work. He had not given any special attention to the microscopic appearances of Foraminifera or of mineral sub- stances. It w^as finally arranged that I should prepare a de scription of the fossil, which Sir William would take to London, along with the more important specimens, and a detailed list stating all the structures observed in each. Sir AN'illiam was to submit the manuscript and specimens to Dr. Carpenter, or, failing him, to Prof. T. Rupert Jones, in the hope that these THE DAWN OF LIFE II7 eminent authorities would confirm my conclusions, and bring forward new facts which I might have overlooked or been ignorant of. Sir William saw both gentlemen, who gave their testimony in favour of the organic and foraminiferal character of the specimens ; and Dr. Carpenter, in particular, gave much attention to the subject, and worked out more in detail many of the finer structures, besides contributing valuable suggestions as to the probable affinities of the supposed fossil. Dr. Carpenter thus contributed in a very important manner to the perfecting of the investigations begun in Canada, and on him fell the greater part of their illustration and defence,^ in so far as Great Britain is concerned. The immediate result was a composite paper in the Pro- ceedings of the Geological Society, by Sir W. E. Logan, Dr. Car- penter, Dr. Hunt, and myself, in which the geology, palaeonto- logy and mineralogy of Eozoon Canadense and its containing rocks were first given to the world.^ It cannot be wondered at that when geologists and palseontologists were thus required to believe in the existence of organic remains in rocks regarded as altogether Azoic and hopelessly barren of fossils, and to carry back the dawn of life as far before those Primordial rocks, which were supposed to contain its first traces, as these are before the middle period of the earth's life history, some hesita- tion should be felt Further, the accurate appreciation of the evidence for such a fossil as Eozoon required an amount of knowledge of minerals, of the more humble types of animals, and of the conditions of mineralization of organic remains, pos- sessed by few even of professional geologists. Thus Eozoon has met with some scepticism and not a little opposition, — though the latter has been weaker than we might have expected when ^ In Quaiterly Journal of Geological Society, vol. xxii. ; Proc. Royal Society, vol. xv. ; Intellectual Observer, 1S65. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 1874 ; and other papers and notices. '^ Journal Ceolooical Society, February, 1865. IlS THE DAWN OF LIFE we consider the startling character of the facts adduced, and has mostly come from men imperfectly informed. But what is Eozoon, if really of animal origin ? The shortest answer to this question is, that this ancient fossil is supposed to be the skeleton of a creature belonging to that simple and humbly organized group of animals which are known by the name Protozoa. If we take as a fi^miliar example of these the gelatinous and microscopic creature found in stagnant ponds, and known as the Amceba ^ (Fig. 8), it will form a convenient starting-point. Viewed under a low power, it appears as a little patch of jelly, irregular in form, and constantly changing its aspect as it moves, by the extension of parts of its body into finger-like processes or pseudopods which serve as extempore limbs. When moving on the surface of a slip of glass under the microscope, it seems, as it were, to flow along rather than creep, and its body appears to be of a semi-fluid consistency. It may be taken as an example of the least complex forms of animal life known to us, and is often spoken of by naturalists as if it were merely a little particle of living and scarcely organ- ized jelly or protoplasm. When minutely examined, however, it will not be found so simple as it at first sight appears. Its outer layer is clear and transparent, and more dense than the inner mass, which seems granular. It has at one end a curious vesicle which can be seen gradually to expand and become filled with a clear drop of liquid, and then suddenly to contract and expel the contained fluid through a series of pores in the adjacent part of the outer wall. This is the so-called pulsating vesicle, and is an organ both of circulation and excretion. In another part of the body may be seen the nucleus, which is a little cell capable, at certain times, of producing by its division new individuals. Food, when taken in through the wall of the body, forms little pellets, which become surrounded by a ^ The allemnting animal, alluding to its change of form. THE DAWN OF LIFE 119 digestive liquid exuded from the enclosing mass into rounded cavities or extemporised stomachs. Minute granules are seen to circulate in the gelatinous interior, and may be substitutes for blood-cells, and the outer layer of the body is capable of protrusion in any direction into long processes, which are very mobile, and used for locomotion and prehension. Further, this creature, though destitute of most of the i)arts which we are accustomed to regard as proper to animals, seems to exer- cise volition, and to show the same appetites and passions with animals of higher tyi)e. I have watched one of these animal- FlG. 8. Amoeba. FiG. 9. Actinophrys. From original sketches. cules endeavouring to swallow a one-celled plant as long as its own body; evidently hungry and eager to devour the tempting morsel, it stretched itself to its full extent, trying to envelope the object of its desire. It failed again and again ; but renewed the attempt, until at length, convinced of its hopelessness, it flung itself away as if in disappointment, and made off in search of something more manageable. With the Amoeba are found other types of equally simple Protozoa, but somewhat differently S. E. 9 I20 THE DAWN OF LIFE organized. One of these, Acfinofhrys (Fig. 9), has the body globular and unchanging in form, the outer wall of greater thick- ness ; the pulsating vesicle like a blister on the surface, and the pseudopods long and thread-like. Its habits are similar to those of the Amoeba, and I introduce it to show the variations of form and structure possible even among these simple creatures. The Amoeba and Actinophrys are fresh-water animals, and are destitute of any shell or covering. But in the sea there ex- ist swarms of similar creatures, equally simple in organization, but gifted with the power of secreting around their soft bodies beautiful little shells or crusts of carbonate of lime, having one orifice, and often in addition multitudes of microscopic pores through which the soft gelatinous matter can ooze, and form outside finger-like or thread-like extensions for collecting food. In some cases the shell consists of a single cavity only, but in most, after one cell is completed, others are added, forming a series of cells or chambers communicating with each other, and often arranged spirally or otherwise in most beautiful and symmetrical forms. Some of these creatures, usually named Foraminifera, are locomotive, others sessile and attached. Most of them are microscopic, but some grow by multiplication of chambers till they are a quarter of an inch or more in breadth. The original skeleton or primary cell wall of most of these creatures is seen under the miscroscope to be perforated with innumerable pores, and is extremely thin. When, however, owing to the increaseol size of the shell, or other wants of the creature, it is necessary to give strength, this is done by add- ing new portions of carbonate of lime to the outside, and to these Dr. Carpenter has given the appropriate name of " sup- plemental skeleton " ; and this, when covered by new growths, becomes what he has termed an " intermediate skeleton." The supplemental skeleton is also traversed by tubes, but these are THE DAWN OF LIFE 121 often of larger size than the pores of the cell-wall, and of greater length, and branched in a complicated manner. Thus there are microscopic characters by which these curious shells can be distinguished from those of other marine animals ; and by applying these characters we learn that multitudes of creatures of this type have existed in former periods of the world's history, and that their shells, accumulated in the bottom of the sea, constitute large portions of many limestones. The manner in which such accumulation takes place we learn from what is now going on in the ocean, more especially from the result of the recent deep-sea dredging expeditions. The Foraminifera are vastly numerous, both near the surface and at the bottom of the sea, and multiply rapidly ; and as suc- cessive generations die, their shells accumulate on the ocean bed, or are swept by currents into banks, and thus, in process of time, constitute thick beds of white chalky material, which may eventually be hardened into limestone. This process is now depositing a great thickness of white ooze in the bottom of the ocean ; and in times past it has produced such vast thicknesses of calcareous matter as the chalk and nummulitic limestone of Europe and the orbitoidal limestone of America. The chalk which alone attains a maximum thickness of i,ooo feet, and, according to Lyell, can be traced across Europe for i,ioo geographical miles, may be said to be entirely composed of shells of Foraminifera imbedded in a paste of smaller calcareous bodies, the Coccoliths, which are probably products of marine vegetable life, if not of some animal organism still simpler than the Foraminifera. Lastly, while we have in such modern forms as the masses of Polytrema attached to corals, and the Loftusa of the Eocene and the carboniferous, large fossil foraminiferal species, there is some reason to believe that in the earlier geo- logical ages there existed much larger animals of this grade than are found in our present seas ; and that these, always 122 THE DAWN OF LIFE sessile on the bottom, grew by the addition of successive chambers, in the same manner with the smaller species.^ Let us, then, examine the structure of Eozoon, taking a typical specimen, as we find it in the limestone of Grenville or Petite Nation. In such specimens the skeleton of the animal is represented by a white crystalline marble, the cavities of the cells by green serpentine, the mode of whose introduction we shall have to consider in the sequel. The lowest layer of ser- pentine represents the first gelatinous coat of animal matter which grew upon the bottom, and which, if we could have seen it before any shell was formed upon its surface, must have resembled a minute patch of living slime. On this primary layer grew a delicate calcareous shell, perforated by innumer- able minute tubuli, and resting on the slimy matter of the animal, though supported also by some perpendicular plates or septa. Upon this again was built up, in order to strengthen it, a thickening or supplemental skeleton, more dense, and desti- tute of fine tubuli, but traversed by branching canals, through which the soft gelatinous matter could pass for the nourish- ment of the skeleton itself, and the extension of pseudopods be- yond it. (Figs. 11,12.) So was formed the first layer of Eozoon, which probably was at its beginning only of very small dimen- sions. On this the process of growth of successive layers of animal sarcode and of calcareous skeleton w-as repeated again and again, till in some cases even a hundred or more layers were formed (nature-print. Chap. VI.) As the process went on, however, the vitality of the organism became exhausted, prob- ably by the deficient nourishment of the central and lower layers making greater and greater demands on those above, and so the succeeding layers became thinner, and less sup- plemental skeleton was developed. Finally, toward the top, the regular arrangement in layers was abandoned, and the cells * I refer to some of the Stromatoporrc of the Silurian and the Cryptozoon of the Cambrian. See note appended to this chapter. THE DAWN OF LIFE 123 became a mass of rounded chambers, irregularly piled up in what Dr. Carpenter has termed an "acervuline" manner, and with very thin walls unprotected by supplemental skeleton. Then the growth was arrested, and possibly these upper layers gave off reproductive germs, fitted to float or swim away and to establish new colonies. We may have such reproductive germs in certain curious globular bodies, like loose cells, found in connection with Eozoon in many of the Laurentian lime- i:^/mm> 1 '/ 1/ -I . .^ ' Ik imm Fig. 10. — Minute Foraminiferal forms from the Lnurcntiaii of Long Lake. Highly magnified, {a) Single cell, showing tubulated wall. {^>, f) Portions of same more highly magnified. (if) Serpentine cast of a similar chamber, decalcified, and showing casts of tubuli. stones.^ At St. Pierre, on the Ottawa, these bodies occur on the surface of layers of the limestone in vast numbers, as if they had been growing separately on the bottom, or had been drifted over it by currents. They may have served as repro- ' It would be interesting to compare these bodies with the forms re- cently found by Barrois and Cayeux in the "Azoic " quartzite of Brittany, which should certainly now be called Eozoic. 124 THE DAWN OF LIFE ductive buds or germs to establish new colonies of the species. Such was the general mode of growth of Eozoon, and we may now consider more in detail some questions as to its gigantic size, its precise mode of nutrition, the arrangement of its parts, its relations to more modern forms, and the effects of its growth in the Laurentian seas. , AVith respect to the size of Eozoon, this was rivalled by some succeeding animals of the same humble type in later geo- logical ages ; and, as a whole, foraminiferal animals have been diminishing in size in the lapse of geological time. This is indeed a fact of so frequent occurrence that it may almost be regarded as a law of the introduction of new forms of life, that they assume in their early history gigantic dimensions, and are afterwards continued by less magnificent species. The relations of this to external conditions, in the case of higher animals, are often complex and difficult to understand ; but in organisms so low as Eozoon and its allies, they lie more on the surface. Such creatures may be regarded as the simplest and most ready media for the conversion of vegetable matter into animal tissues, and their functions are almost entirely limited to those of nutrition. Hence it is likely tliat they will be able to appear in the most gigantic forms under such conditions as afford them the greatest amount of pabulum for the nourishment of their soft parts and for their skeletons. There is reason to believe, for example, that the occurrence, both in the chalk and the deep-sea mud, of immense quanti- ties of the minute bodies known as Coccoliths along with P'oraminifera, is not accidental. The Coccoliths appear to be grains of calcareous matter formed in minute plants adapted to a deep-sea habitat ; and these, along with the vegetable and animal debris constantly being derived from the death of the living things at the surface, afford the material both of sarcode and shell. Now if the Laurentian graphite represents an exuberance of vegetable growth in those old seas propor- THE DAWN OF LIFE I25 tionate to the great supplies of carbonic acid in the atmosphere and in the waters, and if the Eozoic ocean was even better supphed with salts of lime than those Silurian seas whose vast limestones bear testimony to their richness in such material, we can easily imagine that the conditions may have been more favourable to a creature like Eozoon than those of any other period of geological time. Growing, as Eozoon did, on the floor of the ocean, and covering wide patches with more or less irregular masses, it must have thrown up from its whole surface its pseudopods to seize whatever floating particles of food the waters carried over it. There is also reason to believe, from the outline of certain specimens, that it often grew upward in conical or club- shaped forms, and that the broader patches were penetrated by large pits or oscula, admitting the sea-water deeply into the substance of the masses. In this way its growth might be rapid and continuous ; but it does not seem to have possessed the power of growing indefinitely by new and living layers covering those that had died, in the manner of some corals. Its life seems to have had a definite termination, and when that was reached, an entirely new colony had to be commenced. In this it had more affinity with the Foraminifera, as we now know them, than with the corals, though practically it had the same power with the coral polyps of accumulating limestone in the sea bottom^a power indeed still possessed by its fora- miniferal successors. In the case of coral limestones we know that a large proportion of these consist not of continuous reefs, but of fragments of coral mixed with other calcareous organisms, spread usually by waves and currents in continuous beds over the sea bottom. In like manner we find in the limestones containing Eozoon, layers of fragmental matter which show in places the characteristic structures, and which evidently represent the debris swept from the Eozoic masses and reefs by the action of the waves. It is with this frag- 126 THE DAWN OF LIFE mental matter that the small rounded organisms already re- ferred to most frequently occur ; and while they may be distinct animals, they may also be the fry of Eozoon, or small portions of its acer\-uline upper surface floated off in a living state, and possibly capable of living independently and of founding new colonies. It is only by a somewhat wild poetical licence that Eozoon has been represented as a " kind of enormous composite animal stretching from the shores of Labrador to Lake Superior, and thence northward and southward to an unknown distance, and forming masses 1,500 feet in depth."' We may, it is true, readily believe in the composite nature of masses of Eozoon, and we see in the corals evidence of the great size to which composite animals of a higher grade can attain. In the case of Eozoon we must imagine an ocean floor more uniform and level than that now existing. On this the organism would establish itself in spots and patches. These might finally be- come confluent over large areas, just as massive corals do. As individual masses attained maturity and died, their pores would be filled up with limestone or silicious deposits, and thus could form a solid basis for new generations, and in this way limestone to an indefinite extent might be produced. Further, wherever such masses were high enough to be attacked by the breakers, or v.here portions of the sea bottom were elevated, the more fragile parts of the surface would be broken up and scattered widely in beds of fragments over the bottom of the sea, while here and there beds of mud or sand, or of volcanic debris would be deposited over the li\ing or dead organic mass, and would form the layers of gneiss and other schistose rocks interstratified with the Laurentian limestone. In this way, in short, Eozoon would perform a function combining that which corals and Foraminifera perform in the modern seas ; forming both reef limestones and exten- sive chalky beds, and probably living both in the shallow and THE DAWN OF LTFE 12/ the deeper parts of the ocean. If in connection with this we consider the rapidity with which the soft, simple, and almost structureless sarcode of these Protozoa can be built up, and the probability that they were more abundantly supplied with food, both for nourishing their soft parts and skeletons, than any similar creatures in later times, we can readily understand the great volume and extent of the Laurentian limestones which they aided in producing. I say aided in producing, because I would not care to commit myself to the doctrine that the Laurentian limestones are wholly of this origin. There may have been other limestone builders than Eozoon, w Fig. II. — Section of a Niimmulite, from Eocene Limestone of Syria. Showing chambers, tubuli, and canals. Compare this and Fig. 12 witli Fig. 7 and Nature-print of Eozoon. and there may have been limestones formed by plants like the modern Nulliporcs, or by merely mineral deposition. Its relations to modern animals of its type have been very clearly defined by Dr. Carpenter. In the structure of its proper wall and its fine parallel perforations, it resembles the NuvuHuUtes and their allies ; and the organism may therefore be regarded as an aberrant member of the Nummuline group, which affords some of the largest and most widely distributed of the fossil Foraminifera. This resemblance may be seen in Fig. II. To the Nummulites it also conforms in its tendency to form a supplemental or intermediate skeleton with canals, 128 THE DAWN OF LIFE though the canals themselves in the arrangement more nearly resemble Calcarina, which is represented in Fig. 12. In its superposition of many layers, and in its tendency to a heaped up or acervuline irregular growth it resembles Fofyfrema and Tinoporus, forms of a different group in so far as shell-struc- ture is concerned. It may thus be regarded as a composite type, combining peculiarities now observed in two groups, or it may be regarded as representing one of these in another series. At the time when Ur. Carpenter stated these 1lk Fig. 12. — Portion of shell of Calcarina. Magnified, after Carpenter. {a) Cells. (i>) Original cell wall with tubuli. (<) Supplementary skeleton with canals. affinities, it might be objected that P'oraminifera of these families are in the main found in the modern and Tertiary periods. Dr. Carpenter has since shown that the curious oval Foraminifer called Fusuli)ia, found in the coal formation, is alHed to both Nummulites and Rotalines ; and Mr. Brady has discovered a true Numnuilite in the Lower Carboniferous of Belgium. I have myself found small Foraminifera in the Silurian and Cambro-Silurian of C'anada. This group being THE DAWN OF LIFE 1 29 now brought down to the Palaeozoic, we may hope to trace it to the Primordial, and thus to bring it still nearer to Eozoon in time. Though Eozoon was probably not the only animal of the Laurentian seas, yet it was in all likelihood the most con- spicuous and important as a collector of calcareous matter, filling the same place afterwards occupied by the reef-building corals. Though probably less efficient than these as a con- structor of solid limestones, from its less permanent and con- tinuous growth, it formed wide floors and patches on the sea bottom, and when these were broken up, vast quantities of limestone were formed from their debris. It must also be borne in mind that Eozoon was not everywhere infiltrated with ser- pentine or other silicious minerals ; quantities of its substance were merely filled with carbonate of lime, resembling the chamber w'all so closely that it is nearly impossible to make out the difference, and thus is likely to pass altogether unobserved by collectors, and to baffle even the microscopist. Although, therefore, the layers which contain well characterised Eozoon are few and far between, there is reason to believe that in the composition of the limestones of the Laurentian it bore no small part, and as these limestones are some of them several hundred feet in thickness, and extend over vast areas, Eozoon may be supposed to have been as efficient a world-builder as the Stromatoporae of the Silurian and Devonian, the Globi- gerinas and their allies in the chalk, or the Nummulites and Miliolites in the Eocene. It is a remarkable illustration of the constancy of natural causes and of the persistence of animal types, that these humble Protozoans, which began to secrete calcareous matter in the Laurentian period, have been continuing their work in the ocean through all the geological ages, and are still busy in accumulating those chalky muds with which recent dredging operations in the deep sea have made us so familiar. (See Note appended.) All this seems sufficiently reasonalile, more especially since 130 THE DAWN OF LIFE no mineralogist has yet succeeded in giving a feasible inor- ganic explanation of the combination of canals, lamince, tubu- lation and varied mineral character existing in Eozoon. But then comes the strange fact of its apparent isolation with- out companions in highl}' crystalline rocks, and with appa- rently no immediate successors. This has staggered many, and it certainly, if taken thus baldly, seems in some degree improbable. Recent discoveries, however, are removing this reproach from Eozoon. The Laurentian rocks have yielded other varieties, or perhaps species of the genus, those which I have described as variety Acervulina, and variety Minor, and still another form, more like a Stromatopora, which I have provisionally named E. /afior, from the breadth and uniformity of its plates.^ There are also in the Laurentian limestone cylindrical bodies apparently originally tubular, and with the sides showing radiating markings in the manner of corals, or of the curious Cambrian Arch?eocyathus. Matthew, a most careful observer, has found in the Laurentian limestone of New Brunswick certain laminated bodies of cylindrical form, constituting great reefs in the limestone, and in the slates linear flat objects resembling Algcc or Graptolites, and spicular structures resembling those of sponges.- Britton has also de- scribed from the Laurentian limestone of New Jersey certain ribbon-like objects of graphite which he regards as vegetable, and names Ar-chceophyton Newberryii? Should these objects prove to be organic, Eozoon will no longer be alone. Besides this the peculiar bodies named Cryptozoum by Hall, and which are intermediate in structure between Eozoon and Loftusia, have now been found as low as the Lower Cambrian.' Barrois * Notes on .Specimens of Eozoon, " .Memoirs of Peter Reilp.TlIi Museum,"' 1 888. 2 Bid. Nat. Hist. New Brunsioick, No. IX., 1S90. •" Annals N.Y. Academy of Science, 18SS. ^ Walcolt, Lower Cambrian, 1892. THE DAWN OF LIFE 131 has also recently announced the discovery of forms which he regards as akin to the modern Radiolaria, creatures of a little higher grade than the Foraminifera, in the " Archgean " rocks of Brittany.^ Thus Eozoon is no longer isolated, but has companions of the same great age with itself. The progress of discovery is also daily carrying the life of the Cambrian to lower beds, and thus nearer to the Laurentian. It is not un- likely that in a few years a pre-Cambrian fauna will force itself on the attention of the most sceptical geologists. References: — "Life's Da\sn on Earth," London, 1875. (^'o\v out of print.) "Specimens of Eozoon Canadense in the Peter Redpath Museum, Montreal," 1S88. (This memoir contains reference to pre- vious papers.) ^ Natural Science, Oct., 1892. Appended Notes. 1. Stromatopora-. — It has been usual of late to regard these as allies of the modern Millepores and HydrsetiniEe ; but careful study of large series of specimens has convinced me that some species, notably the Stroinalo- cerium of the Cambro-Silurian and the cryptozoum of the Cambrian, cannot be so referred. I hope to establish this in the future, if time permit. 2. Modern Foraminifera. — The discovery by Brady and Lister of reproductive chamberlets at the margin of the modern orbitolites, tends to connect this with Eozoon. The gigantic foraminiferal species discovered by Agassiz at the Gallipagos, has points of affinity with Eozoon ; and its arenaceous nature does not affect this, as we know sandy species in this group closely allied to others that are calcareous. WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON. DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF DR. WILLIAM B. CARPENTER, Who, among his many Services to Science, devoted much time and labour to the investigation OF EoZOON, AND BY HIS Knowledge of Foraminifera AND unrivalled POWER OF UNRAVELLING DIFFICULT Structures DID much to Render it Intelligible. The Microscope in Geology — Contributions of the Study of Eozoon to our Kno\vledce of the Mode OF Preservation of Fossils — Its Teaching Rela- tively to the Origin of Life and the Laws of its Introduction and Progress S. E. Specimen ok Eozoon Canadense (Dawson), showing Genera) Fori and Osculiform Tubes, (Reproduced from Photograph.) CHAPTER VI. WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON. THE microscope has long been a recognised and valued aid of the geological observer, and is perhaps now in danger of being somewhat overrated by enthusiastic specialists. To the present writer its use is no novelty. When, as a very young geologist, collecting fossil plants in the coal fields of Novia Scotia, I obtained access to the then recently published work of Witham on the " Internal Structure of Fossil Vege- tables." ^ Fired by the desire to learn something of the structure of the blocks of fossil wood in my collection, I at once procured a microscope of what would now be considered a very im- perfect kind, and proceeded to make attempts to slice and examine my specimens, and was filled with joy when these old blackened stems for the first time revealed to me their wonderful structures. At the same time I extended my studies to every minute form of life that could be obtained from the sea or fresh waters. A few years later (in 1841), when a student in Edinburgh, I made the acquaintance of Mr. Sanderson of that city, who had worked for Nicol and Witham in the preparation of specimens, and learnt the modes which he had employed. Since that time I have been accustomed to subject every rock, earth or fossil which came under my notice to microscopic scrutiny, not as a mere specialist in that mode of observation, or with the parade of methods and details now customary, but with the view of obtaining valuable facts bear- ' Edinburgh, 1 833. I3S 136 WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON ing on any investigation I might have in hand. It was this habit which induced my old friend, Sir William Logan, in 1858 and subsequent years to ask my aid in the study of the forms believed or suspected to be organic, which had been discovered in the course of his surveys of the Laurentian rocks. In one respect this was unfortunate. It occupied much time, inter- fered to some extent with other researches, led to unpleasant controversies. But these evils were more than compensated by the insight which the study gave into the fact of the persistence of organic structures in highly crystalline rocks, and to the modes of ascertaining and profiting by these obscure remains, while it has guided and stimulated enquiry and thought as to the origin and history of life. These benefits entitle the re- searches and discussions on Eozoon to be regarded as marking a salient point in the history of geological discovery, and it is to these principally that I would attract attention in the pre- sent chapter. Perhaps nothing excites more scepticism as to the animal nature of Eozoon than the prejudice existing among geologists that no organism can be preserved in rocks so highly crystalline as those of the Laurentian series. I call this a prejudice, be- cause any one who makes the microscopic structure of rocks and fossils a special study, soon learns that fossils and the rocks containing them may undergo the most remarkable and complete mechanical and chemical changes without losing their minute structure, and that limestones, if once fossiliferous, are hardly ever so much altered as to lose all traces of the organisms which they contained, while it is a most common occurrence to find highly crystalline rocks of this kind abound- ing in fossils preserved as to their minute structure. Let us, however, look at the precise conditions under which this takes place. When calcareous fossils of irregular surface and porous or cellular texture, such as Eozoon may have been, or corals were WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON 1 37 and are, become imbedded in clay, marl, or other soft sedi- ment, they can be washed out and recovered in a condition similar to that of recent specimens, except that their pores or cells, if open, may be filled with the material of the matrix, or if not so open that they can be thus filled, they may be more or less incrusted with mineral deposits introduced by water percolating the mass, or may even be completely filled up in this way. But if such fossils are contained in hard rocks, they usually fail, when these are broken, to show their external sur- faces, and, breaking across with the containing rock, they ex- hibit their internal structure merely, — and this more or less distinctly, according to the manner in which their cells or cavities have been filled with mineral matter. Here the microscope becomes of essential senice, especially when the structures are minute. A fragment of fossil wood which to the naked eye is nothing but a dark stone, or a coral which is merely a piece of grey or coloured marble, or a specimen of common cr)'stalline limestone made up originally of coral frag- ments, presents, when sliced and magnified, the most perfect and beautiful structure. In such cases it will be found that ordinarily the original substance of the fossil remains in a more or less altered state. Wood may be represented by dark lines of coaly matter, or coral by its white or transparent calcareous lamince; while the material which has been introduced, and which fills the cavities, may so differ in colour, transparency, or crystallization, as to act differently on light, and so reveal the original structure. These fillings are very curious. Sometimes they are mere earthy or muddy matter which has been washed into the ca^■ities. Sometimes they are transparent and cr}stal- line. Often they are stained with oxide of iron or coaly materials. They may consist of carbonate of lime, silica or silicates, sulphate of bar)ta, oxides of iron, carbonate of iron, iron pyrite, or sulphides of copper or lead, all of which are common materials. They are sometimes so complicated that 138 WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON I have seen even the minute cells of woody structures, each with several bands of differently coloured materials deposited in succession, like the coats of an onyx agate. A further stage of mineralisation occurs when the substance of the organism is altogether removed and replaced by foreign matter, either little by little, or by being entirely dissolved or decomposed, leaving a cavity to be filled by infiltration. In this state are some silicified woods, and those corals which have been not filled with but replaced by silica, and can thus sometimes be obtained entire and perfect by the solution in an acid of the containing limestone, or by its removal in weathering. In this state are the beautiful silicified corals ob- tained from the corniferous limestone of Lake Erie, which are so perfectly replaced by flinty matter that when weathered out of the limestone, or treated with acid till the latter is removed, we find the coral as perfect as when recent. It may be well to present to the eye these different stages of fossilization. I have attempted to do this in Fig. 13, taking a tabulate coral of the genus Favosites for an example, and supposing the material employed to be calcite and silica. Precisely the same illustra- tion would apply to a piece of wood, except that the cell wall would be carbonaceous matter instead of carbonate of lime. In this figure the dotted parts represent carbonate of lime, the diagonally shaded parts silica or a silicate. Thus we have in the natural state the walls of carbonate of lime and the cavities empty (a). When fossilized the cavities may be merely filled with carbonate of lime, or they may be filled with silica ((^, c) ; or the walls themselves may be replaced by silica, and the cavities may remain filled with carbonate of lime (d) ; or both the walls and cavities may be represented by or filled with silica or silicates (r). The ordinary specimens of Eozoon are supposed to be in the third of these stages, though some exist in the second, and I have reason to believe that some have reached to the fifth. I have not met with any in the WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON 139 fourth stage, though this is not uncommon in Silurian and Devonian fossils. I have further to remark that the reason why wood and the cells of corals so readily become silicified is that the organic matter which they contain, becoming oxidized in decay, produces carbon dioxide, which, by its affinity for alkalies, can decompose soluble silicates and thus throw down their silica in an insoluble state. Thus a fragment of decay- ing wood imbedded in a deposit holding water and alkaline silicates almost necessarily becomes silicified. It is also to be remarked that the ordinary specimens of Eozoon have actually not attained to the extreme degree of mineralization seen in some much more recent silicified woods and corals, inasmuch a i:L_. '.'I'm , c- r A ri rr=cr Fk;. 13.- — Diagram sliowiiig different States of Fossilization of a cell of a Tul)ulate Coral, {a) Natural condition — -walls calcite, cell empty. (l>) \N'alis calcite, cell filled with the same, (c) Walls calcite, cell filled with silica or silicate, (d) Walls silicified, cell filled with calcite. {c) Walls silicified, cell filled with silica or silicate. as the portion believed to have been the original calcareous test has not usually been silicified, but still remains in the state of calcium carbonate. With regard, then, to the calcareous organisms with which we have now more especially to do, when these are embedded in pure limestone and filled with the same, so that the whole rock, fossils and cavities, is one in composition, and when meta- morphic action has caused the whole to become crystalline, and has perhaps removed the remains of carbonaceous matter, it may be very difficult to detect any traces of structure. But 140 WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON even in this case careful management of light may reveal some indications. In many instances, however, even where the limestones have become perfectly crystalline, and the cleavage planes cut freely across the fossils, these exhibit their forms and minute structures in great perfection. This is the case in many of the Lower Silurian limestones of Canada, as I have elsewhere shown. ^ The grey crystalline Trenton limestone of Montreal, used as a building stone, is an excellent illustration. To the naked eye it is a grey marble composed of cleavable crystals ; but when examined in thin slices, it shows its or- ganic fragments in the greatest beauty, and all their minute parts are perfectly marked out by delicate carbonaceous lines. The only exception in this limestone is in the case of the crinoids, in which the cellular structure is filled with trans- parent calc-spar, perfectly identical with the original solid matter, so that they appear solid and homogeneous, but there are examples in which even the minute meshes of these become apparent. The specimen represented in Fig. 14 is a mass of Corals, Polyzoa, and Crinoids, and shows these under a low power, as represented in the figure. The specimen in Fig. 15 shows the Faurentian Eozoon in a similar state of preservation. It is from a sketch by Dr. Carpenter, and exhibits the delicate canals partly filled with calcite or dolomite, as clear and colour- less as that of the shell itself, and distinguishable only by careful management of the light. In the case of recent and fossil Foraminifers, these very frequently have their chambers filled solid with calcareous matter, and as Dr. Carpenter well remarks, even well preserved Tertiary Nummulites in this state often fail greatly in showing their structures, though in the same condition they occasionally show these in great perfection. Among the finest I have seen are specimens from tlie Mount of Olives, and Dr. Carpenter ' Canadian Naturalist, 1S59 : "Microscopic Structure of C.anatlian Limestones." WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON 141 mentions as equally good those of the London clay at Brackle- sham. But in no condition do modern Foraminifera, or those of the Tertiary and Mesozoic rocks appear in greater perfection than when filled with the hydrous silicate of iron and potash Fig. 14. — Slice of Crystalline Lower Silurian Limestone ; showing Crinoicls, Bryozoa, and Corals in fragments. f^^^rZCR^J^IS^^^Uj Fig. 15. — Walls of Eozoon penetrated with Canals. The unshaded portions filled with Calcite. (After Carpenter.) called glauconite or green earth, a substance now forming in some parts of the ocean, and which gives, by the abundance of its little bottle-green concretions the name of " greensand " to formations of the Cretaceous age both in Europe and America. 142 WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON In some beds of greensand every grain seems to have been moulded into the interior of a microscopic shell, and has re- tained its form after the frail envelope has been removed. In some cases the glauconite has not only filled the chambers but has penetrated the fine tubulation, and when the shell is removed, either naturally or by the action of an acid, the silicious fillings of the interior of the tubes project in minute needles or bundles of threads of marvellous delicacy from the surface of the cast. It is in the warmer seas, and especially in the bed of the Egean and of the Gulf Stream, that such specimens are now most usually found.' If we ask why this mineral glauconite should be associated with foraminiferal shells, the answer is that they are both products of one kind of locality. The same sea bottoms in which Foraminifera most abound are also those in which the chemical conditions for the formation of glauconite exist. Hence, no doubt, the association of this mineral with the great foraminiferal forma- tion of the chalk. It is indeed by no means unlikely that the selection by these creatures of the pure carbonate of lime from the sea water or its minute plants, may be the means of setting free the silica, iron, and potash, in a state suitable for their combination. Similar silicates are found associated with marine limestones, as far back as the Cambro-Silurian age ; and Dr. Sterry Hunt, than whom no one can be a better authority on chemical geology, has argued on chemical grounds that the occurrence of serpentine with the remains of Eozoon is an association of the same character. However this may be, the infiltration of the pores of Eozoon with serpentine and other silicates has evidently been one main means of its i)reservation. When so infiltrated no meta- mori)hism short of the complete fusion of the containing rock ' Ikautiful specimens of Numnnilites preseived in this way, from tlie Eocene of Kumpfen in 15avaria, have been comnninicated to me lliiougli the kindness of Dr. Otto Hahn. WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON I43 could obliterate the minutest points of structure ; and that such fusion has not occurred, the preservation in the Laurentian rocks of the most delicate lamination of the beds shows con- clusively ; while, as already stated, it can be shown that the alteration which has occurred might have taken place at a temperature far short of that necessary to fuse limestone. Thus has it happened that these most ancient fossils have been handed down to our time in a state of preservation com- parable, as Dr. Carpenter states, to that of the best preserved fossil Foraminifera from the more recent formations that have come under his observation in the course of all his long ex- perience. Let us now look more minutely at the nature of the typical specimens of Eozoon as originally observed and described, and then turn to those preserved in other ways, or more or less de- stroyed or defaced. Taking a polished specimen from Petite Nation, we find the shell represented by white limestone, and the chambers by light green serpentine. By acting on the surface with a dilute acid we etch out the calcareous part, leaving a cast in serpentine of the cavities originally occupied by the soft animal substance, and when this is done in polished slices, these may be made to print their own characters on l)aper, as has actually been done in the plate prefixed, which is an electrotype from an etched specimen, and shows both the laminated and acervuline parts of the fossil. If the pro- cess of decalcification has been carefully executed, we find in the excavated spaces delicate ramifying processes of opaque serpentine or transparent dolomite, which were originally im- bedded in the calcareous substance, and which are often of extreme fineness and complexity.^ (Figs. 18, 19.) These are casts of the canals which traversed the shell when still inhabited by the animal, and have subsequently been filled with mineral • Very fine specimens can be produced by polishing thin slices, and then etching them slightly with a very weak acid. (Plate prefixed.) 144 WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON matter. In evidence of this we sometimes find in a single canal an outer tubular layer of serpentine and an inner filling of dolomite, just as vessels of fossil plants are sometimes filled with successive coats of different materials. In some well preserved specimens we find the original cell wall represented by a delicate white film, which under the microscope shows minute needle-like parallel processes representing its still finer tubuli. It is evident that to have filled these tubuli, the ser- pentine must have been introduced in a state of actual solution, and must have carried with it no foreign impurities. Conse- quently we find that in the chambers themselves the serpentine is pure ; and if we examine it under polarized light, we see that it presents a singularly curdled or irregularly laminated appear- ance, as if it had an imperfectly crystalline structure, and had been deposited in irregular lamince, beginning at the sides of the chambers, and filling them toward the middle, and had afterward been cracked by shrinkage, and the cracks filled with a second deposit of serpentine.^ Now, serpentine is a hydrous silicate of magnesia, and all that we need to suppose is that in the waters of the Laurentian sea magnesia was present instead of iron, alumina or potash, and we can understand that the Laurentian fossil has been petrified by infiltration with ser- pentine, as more modern Foraminifera have been with glaucon- ite, which, though it does not contain magnesia, often has a considerable percentage of alumina. Further, in specimens of Eozoon from Burgess, the filling mineral is loganite, a com- pound of silica, alumina, magnesia and iron with water, while in other specimens the filling mineral is pyroxene. In like ' The same structures may be well seen in ihin slices polished, to be viewed as transparent objects. I may, however, explain tliat if these are made roughly, and lieated in the process, they may often show only mineral structures and cleavage planes, whereas, if polished with great care and slowly, and afterwards cleaned with an acid, they may show tlic canals in great perfection. WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON I45 manner, in certain Silurian limestones from New Brunswick and Wales, in which the delicate microscopic pores of the skeletons of stalked starfishes or crinoids have been filled with mineral deposits, so that when decalcified these are most beau- tifully represented by their casts, Dr. Hunt has proved the filling mineral to be ^ intermediate between serpentine and glauconite. We have, therefore, ample warrant for adhering to his con- FiG. 16. — ^Joint of a Crinoid, having its Pores injected with a Hydrous Silicate. Upper Silurian Limestone, Pole Hill, New Brunswick. Magni- fied 25 diameters. elusion that the Laurentian serpentine was deposited under conditions similar to those of the modern greensand. Indeed, independently of Eozoon, it is impossible that any geologist who has studied the manner in which this mineral is associated with the Laurentian limestones could believe it to have been * Silicate of alumina, iron, magnesia, and potash. 146 WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON formed in any other way. Nor need we be astonished at the fineness of the infiltration by which these minute tubes, perhaps Tooo 0 of ^" '"^h i"^ diameter, are filled with mineral matter. The micro-geologist well knows how, in more modern deposits, the finest pores of fossils are filled, and that mineral matter in solution can penetrate the smallest openings that the micro- scope can detect. Wherever the fluids of the living body can penetrate, there also mineral substances can be carried, and ^'"/,VM ir Fig. 17.— Shell from a Silurian Limestone, Wales ; its cavity filled with Hydrous Silicate. Magnified 25 diameters. tliis natural injection, effected under great pressure and with the advantage of ample time, can surpass any of the feats of the anatomical manipulator. Fig. 16 represents a microscopic joint of a Crinoid from the Upper Silurian of New Brunswick, injected with the hydrous silicate already referred to, and Fig. 17 shows a microscopic chambered or spiral shell, from a Welsh Silurian limestone, with its cavities filled with a similar substance. Taking the specimens preserved by serpentine as typical, we now turn to certain other and, in some respects, less character- WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON 147 istic specimens, which are nevertheless very instructive. At the Calumet some of the masses are partly filled with serpen- tine and partly with white pyroxene, an anhydrous silicate of lime and magnesia. The two minerals can readily be distin- guished when viewed with polarized light ; and in some slices I have seen part of a chamber or group of canals filled with Fig. iS. — Casts of Canals of Eozoon in Serpentine, decalcified and highly magnified. Fin. 19. — Canals of Eozoon. Highly Magnified. serpentine and part with pyroxene. In this case the pyroxene, or the materials which now compose it, must have been intro- duced by infiltration, as well as the serpentine. This is the more remarkable as pyroxene is most usually found as an in- gredient of igneous rocks ; but Dr. Hunt has shown that in the Laurentian limestones, and also in veins traversing them, it IX:> WHAT ilAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOOX occurs under conditions which imply its deposition from water, either cold or warm. Gombel remarks on this : — " Hmit, in a Tarr ingenious manner, compares this formation and deposition of serpentine, pyroxene and loganite, with that of glauconite, whose formation has gone on uninterruptedly from the Silurian to the Tertiary period, and is even now taking place in the depths of the sea ; it being well known that Ehrenberg and others have already shown that many of the grains of glauconite are casts of the intmor of foraminiferal shells. In the light of parison, the notion that the serpentine and such-like : of the primitive limestones have been formed, in a similar niannerj in the chambers of Eozoic Foraminifera, loses any traces of improbability which it might at first seem to possess." In many ports of the skeleton of Eozoon, and even in the best infiltrated serpentine specimens, there are portions of the cell wall and canal system which have been filled with cal- careous ^)ar or with dolomite, so similar to the skeleton that it ran be detected only under the most favourable lights and with great care (Fig. 15, supra). It is further to be remarked that in al the specimens of true Eozoon, as well as in many '"'""-" -/[careous fossils preserved in ancient rocks, the cal- - .".latter, even when its minute structures are not pre- served, or are obscured, presents a minutely granular or curdled appearance, arising, no doubt, from the original presence of organic matter, and not recognised in purely inorganic cakxte. Other specimens of fragmental Eozoon 'from the Petite Natkm localities have thdr canals filled with dolomite, which probably penetrated them after they were broken up and im- bedded \xx the rocL I have ascertained, with respect to these firagments of Eozoon, that they occur abundandy in certain layers of the Laurentian limestone, beds of some thickness beii^ in great part made up of them, and coarse and fine frag- WHAT iL\Y BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON 149 molts occur in altanate Livers, lite the broken corals in sorae Silurian limestones. Finally, on this part of the subject, careful obsaration of many specimens of Laurentian limestone which present no trace of Eozoon when viewed by the naked eye. and no evi- dence of structure when acted on with acids, are nevertheless organic, and consist of fragments of Eozoon, and possibly of other organisms, not infiltrated with silicates, but only with carbonate of hme, and consequendy revealing only obscure indications of their minute structure. I have satisfied myself of this by long and patient investigations, which scarcely admit of any adequate representation, either by words or figures. Even,- worker m those applications of the microscope to geological specimens which have been termed micro-geology, is familiar with the fiict that crvstaHine forces and mechanical movements of material often play the most tintastic tricks with fossihzed organic matter. In fossil woods, for example, we otten have the tissues disorganized, with radiating crvstaHiza- tions of calcite and little spherical concretions of quartz, or dis- seminated cubes and grains of pyrite, or Htde veins filled with sulphate of barium or other minerals. We need no^ therefore, be surprised to find that in the venerable rocks rnnrnming Eozoon. such things occur in the highly crysmllfne Laurentian Umestoaes, and even in some still showing the traces of Eozoon. We find many disseminated crystals of magnetite, pyrite, spineL mica and other minerals, curiously curved prisms of vermicular mica, bundles of aciculi of tremohte and similar substances, veins of calcite and crysodle or fibrous serpentine, which often traverse the best specimens. WTiere these occur abundantly, we usually find no organic structures remaining, or if they exist, they are in a very defective state of preservaaon. Even in specimens presentingt he lamination of Eozoon to the naked eye. these crystalline actions have often destroyei the minute structure : and I fear that some micrcscopists have S. E. H I50 WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON been victimized, by having under their consideration only specimens in which the actual characters had been too much defaced to be discernible. No mistake can be greater than to suppose that any and every specimen of Laurentian limestone must contain Eozoon. More especially have I hitherto failed to detect traces of it in those carbonaceous or graphitic lime- stones which are so very abundant in the Laurentian country. Perhaps where vegetable matter was very plentiful Eozoon did not thrive, or, on the other hand, the growth of Eozoon may have diminished the quantity of vegetable matter. It is also to be observed that much compression and distortion have oc- curred in the beds of Laurentian limestone and their contained fossils, and also that the specimens are often broken by faults, some of which are so small as to appear only on microscopic examination, and to shift the plates of the fossil just as if they were beds of rock. This, though it sometimes produces puzzling appearances, is an evidence that the fossils were hard and brittle when this faulting took place, and is consecjuently an additional proof of their extraneous origin. Li some speci- mens it would seem that the lower and older part of the fossil had been wholly converted into serpentine or pyroxene, or had so nearly experienced this change that only small parts of the calcareous wall can be recognised. These portions correspond with fossil woods altogether silicified, not only by the filling of the cells, but also by the conversion of the walls into silica. I have specimens which manifestly show the transition from the ordinary condition of filling with serpentine to one in which the cell-walls are represented obscurely by one shade vi this mineral and the cavities by another. In general, however, it will be gathered from the above explanations that the specimens of Eozoon fall short in thoroughness of mineralization of some fossils in much more modern rocks. I have specimens of ancient sponges whose spicular skeletons, originally silicious, have been replaced by pyrite or bisulphide of iron, and of WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON 15I Tertiary fossil woods retaining perfectly their most minute struc- tures, yet entirely replaced by silica, so that not a particle of the original wood remains. The above considerations as to mode of preservation of Eozoon concur with those in the previous chapter in showing its oceanic character, if really a fossil ; but the ocean of the Eozoic period may not have been so deep as at present, and its waters were probably warm and well stocked with mineral matters derived from the newly formed land, or from hot springs in its own bottom. On this point the interesting in- vestigations of Dr. Hunt with reference to the chemical con- ditions of the Silurian seas allow us to suppose that the Lau- rentian ocean may have been much more richly stored, more especially with salts of lime and magnesia, than that of subse- quent times. Hence the conditions of warmth, light, and nutri- ment required by such gigantic Protozoans would all be present, and hence, also, no doubt, some of the peculiarities of their mineralization. I desire by the above statement of facts to show, on the one hand, that the study of Eozoon, regarded as probably an ancient form of marine life, aids us in understanding other ancient fossils, and their manner of preservation ; and on the other hand, that those who deny the organic origin of Eozoon place us in the position of being unable, in any rational manner, to account for these forms, so characteristic of the Laurentian limestones, and set at naught the fair conclusions deducible from the mode of preservation of fossils in the later formations. The evidence of organic origin is perhaps not conclusive, and in the present state of knowledge it is certain to be met with much scepticism, more especially by certain classes of specialists, whose grasp of knowledge is not sufficiently wide to cover, on the one hand, fossilization and metamorphism, and on the other, to under- stand the lower forms of life. It may, however, be sufficient to qualify us in turning our thoughts for a few moments to con- 152 WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON siderations suggested by the probable origin of animal life in the seas of the Laurentian period. Looking down from the elevation of our physiological and mental superiority, it is difficult to realize the exact conditions in which life exists in creatures so simple as the Protozoa. There may perhaps be higher intelligences, that find it equally difficult to realize how life and reason can manifest themselves in such poor houses of clay as those we inhabit. But placing ourselves near to these creatures, and entering, as it were, into sympathy with them, we can understand something of their powers and feelings. In the first place it is plain that they can vigorously, if roughly, exercise those mechanical, chemical, and vegetative powers of life which are characteristic of the animal. They can seize, swallow, digest, and assimilate food ; and, employing its albuminous parts in nourishing their tissues, can burn away the rest in processes akin to our respi- ration, or reject it from their system. Like us, they can sub- sist only on food which the plant has previously produced ; for in this world, from the beginning of time, the plant has been the only organism which could use the solar light and heat as forces to enable it to turn the dead elements of matter into living, growing tissues, and into organic compounds capable of nourishing the animal. Like us, the Protozoa ex- pend the food which they have assimilated in the production of animal force, and in doing so cause it to be oxidized, or burnt away, and resolved again into dead matter. It is true that we have much more complicated apparatus for performing these functions, but it does not follow that these give us much real superiority, except relatively to the more difficult condi- tions of our existence. The gourmand who enjoys his dinner may have no more pleasure in the act than the Amoeba which swallows a Diatom ; and for all that the man knows of the subsequent processes to which the food is subjected, his in- terior might be a mass of jelly, with extemporised vacuoles, WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON 1 53 like that of his humble fellow-animal. The clay is after all the same, and there may be as much difficulty in the making of a simple organism with varied powers, as a more complex frame for doing higher work. In order that we may feel, a complicated apparatus of nerves and brain cells has to be constructed and set to work ; but the Protozoon, without any distinct brain, is all brain, and its sensation is simply direct. Thus vision in these creatures is probably performed in a rough way by any part of their transparent bodies, and taste and smell are no doubt in the same case. Whether they have any perception of sound as distinct from the mere -vibrations ascertained by touch, we do not know. Here, also, we are not far removed above the Pro- tozoa, especially those of us to whom touch, seeing and hear- ing are direct acts, without any thought or knowledge of the apparatus employed. We might, so far, as well be Amoebas. As we rise higher we meet with more differences. Yet it is evident that our gelatinous fellow being can feel pain, dread danger, desire possessions, enjoy pleasure, and in a direct un- conscious way entertain many of the appetites and passions that affect ourselves. The wonder is that with so little of organization it can do so much. Yet, perhaps, life can mani- fest itself in a broader and more intense way where there is little organization, and a highly strung and complex organism is not so much a necessary condition of a higher life as a mere means of better adapting it to its present surroundings. A similar lesson is taught by the complexity of their skeletons. We speak in a crude, unscientific way of these animals accumulating calcareous matter, and building up reefs of limestone. We must, however, bear in mind that they are as dependent on their food for the materials of their skeletons as we are, and that their crusts grow in the interior of the sarcode just as our bones do within our bodies. The provision even for nourishing the interior of the skeleton by 154 WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOOX tubuli and canals is in principle similar to that involved in the canals, cells, and canalicules of bone. The Amoeba, of course, knows neither more nor less of this than the average English- man. It is altogether a matter of unconscious growth. The process in the Protozoa strikes some minds, however, as the more wonderful of the two. It is, says an eminent modern physiologist, a matter of " profound significance " that this "particle of jelly [the sarcode of a Foraminifer] is capable of guiding physical forces in such a manner as to give rise to these exquisite and almost mathematically arranged structures." Respecting the structures themselves there is no exaggeration in this. No arch or dome framed by human skill is more perfect in beauty or in the realization of mechanical ideas than the tests of some Foraminifera, and none is so complete and wonderful in its internal structure. The particle of jelly, how- ever, is a figur J of speech. The body of the humblest Foram- inifer is much more than this. It is an organism with divers parts, and it is endowed with the mysterious forces of life which in it guide the physical forces, just as they do in building up phosphate of lime in our bones, or indeed, just as the will of the architect does in building a palace. The profound signi- ficance which this has, reaches beyond the domain of the physical and vital, even to the spiritual. It clings to all our conceptions of living things : "quite as much, for example, to the evolution of an animal with all its parts from a one-celled germ, as to the connection of brain cells with the manifesta- tions of intelligence." Viewed in this way, we may share with the author of the sentence I have quoted his feeling of venera- tion in the presence of this great wonder of animal life, " burn- ing, and not consumed," nay, building up, and that in many and beautiful forms. We may realize it most of all in the presence of the organism which was perhaps the first to mani- fest on our planet these marvellous powers. We must, how- ever, here also, beware of that credulity which makes too many WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON 1 55 thinkers limit their conceptions altogether to physical force in matters of this kind. The merely materialistic physiologist is really in no better position than the savage who quails before the thunderstorm, or rejoices in the solar warmth, and seeing no force or power beyond, fancies himself in the immediate presence of his God. In Eozoon we must discern not only a mass of jelly but a being endowed with that higher vital force which surpasses vegetable life, and also physical and chemical forces ; and in this animal energy we must see an emanation from a Will higher than our own, ruling vitality itself ; and this not merely to the end of constructing the skeleton of a Protozoon, but of elaborating all the wonderful developments of life that were to follow in succeeding ages, and with re- ference to which the production and growth of this creature were initial steps. It is this mystery of design which really constitutes the " profound significance " of the foraminiferal skeleton. Another phenomenon of animality forced upon our notice by the Protozoa is that of the conditions of life in animals not individual, as we are, but aggregative and cumulative in in- definite masses. What, for instance, the relations to each other of the Polyps, growing together in a coral mass, or the separate parts of a Sponge, or the separate lobes of a Foram- inifer. In the case of the Polyps we may believe that there is special sensation in the tentacles and oral opening of each individual, and that each may experience hunger when in want, or satisfaction when it is filled with food, and that in- juries to one part of the mass may indirectly affect other parts, but that the nutrition of the whole mass may be as much unfelt by the individual Polyps as the processes going on in our own liver are by us. So in the case of a large Sponge, or Foraminifer, there may be some special sensation in individual cells, pseudopods, or segments, and the general sensation may be very limited, while unconscious living powers pervade the 156 WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON whole. In this matter of aggregation of animals we have thus various grades. The Foraminifers and Sponges present us with the simplest of all, and that which most resembles the aggregation of buds in the plant. The Polyps and complex Bryozoons present a higher and more specialized type ; and though the bilateral symmetry which obtains in the higher animals is of a different nature, it still at least reminds us of that multiplication of similar parts which we see in the lower grades of being. It is worthy of notice here that the lower animals which show aggregative tendencies present but im- perfect indications, or none at all, of bilateral symmetry. Their bodies, like those of plants, are for the most part built up around a central axis, or they show tendencies to spiral modes of growth. It is this composite sort of life which is connected with the main geological function of the Foraminifer. While active sensation, appetite, and enjoyment pervade the pseudopods and external sarcode of the mass, the hard skeleton common to the whole is growing within ; and in this way the calcareous matter is gradually removed from the sea water, and built up in solid reefs, or in piles of loose foraminiferal shells. Thus it is the aggregative or common life, alike in Foraminifers as in Corals, that tends most powerfully to the accumulation of calcareous matter ; and those creatures whose life is of this complex character are best suited to be world builders, since the result of their growth is not merely a cemetery of their osseous remains, but a huge communistic edifice, to which multitudes of lives have contributed, and in which successive generations take up their abode on the remains of their an- cestors. This process, so potent in the progress of the earth's geological history, began, as far as we know, with Eozoon. Whether, then, in questioning our proto-foraminifer, we have reference to the vital functions of its gelatinous sarcode, to the complexity and beauty of its calcareous test, or to its capacity WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON 1 57 for effecting great material results through the union of in- dividuals, we perceive that we have to do, not with a low condition of those powers which we designate life, but with their manifestation through the means of a simple organism ; and this in a degree of perfection which we, from our point of view, would have in the first instance supposed impossible. If we imagine a world altogether destitute of life, we still might have geological formations in progress. Not only would volcanoes belch forth their liquid lavas and their stones and ashes, but the waves and currents of the ocean and the rains and streams on the land, with the ceaseless decomposing action of the carbonic acid of the atmosphere, would be piling up mud, sand, and pebbles in the sea. There might even be some formation of limestone taking place where springs charged with bicarbonate of lime were oozing out on the land or the bottom of the waters. But in such a world all the carbon would be in the state of carbon dioxide, and all the limestone would either be diffused in small quantities through various rocks or in limited local beds, or in solution, perhaps as chloride of calcium, in the sea. Dr. Hunt has given chemical grounds for supposing that the most ancient seas were largely supplied with this very soluble salt, instead of the chloride of sodium, or common salt, which now prevails in the sea water. Where in such a world would life be introduced ? on the land or in the waters ? All scientific probability would say in the latter.^ The ocean is now vastly more populous than the land. The waters alone afford the conditions necessary at once for the most minute and the grandest organisms, at once for the simplest and for others of the most complex character. Especially do they afford the best conditions for * A recent writer (Simrolh) lias, however, unilertaken to iiiaintain the thesis that land life preceded that in the sea. It is unnecessary to say that he is an evolutionist, influenced by the necessity laid upon tliat pliilosopliy to deduce whales, seals, etc., from land animals. 158 WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON those animals which subsist in complex communities, and which aggregate large quantities of mineral matter in their skeletons. So true is this that up to the present time all the species of Protozoa and of the animals most nearly allied to them are aquatic. Even in the waters, however, plant life, though possibly in very simple forms, must precede the animal. Let humble plants, then, be introduced in the waters, and they would at once begin to use the solar light for the jiurpose of decomposing carbonic acid, and forming carbon compounds which had not before existed, and which, independently of vegetable life, would never have existed. At the same time lime and other mineral substances present in the sea water would be fixed in the tissues of these plants, either in a minute state of division, as little grains or Coccoliths, or in more solid masses like those of the Corallines and Nullii)ores. In this way a beginning of limestone formation might be made, and quantities of carbonaceous and bituminous matter, resulting from the decay of vegetable substances might accumulate on the sea bottom. Now arises the opportunity for animal life. The plants have collected stores of organic matter, and their minute germs, along with microscopic species, are floating everywhere in the sea. The plant has fulfilled its function as far as the waters are concerned, and now a place is prepared for the animal. In what form shall it ajipear? Many of its higher forms, those which depend upon animal food or on the more complex plants for subsistence, would obviously be un- suitable. Further, the sea water is still too much saturated with saline matter to be fit for the higher animals of the waters. Still further, there may be a residue of internal heat forbidding coolness, and that solution of free oxygen which is an essential condition of existence to the higher forms of life. Something must be found suitable for this saline, imperfectly oxygenated, tepid sea. Something, too, is wanted that can aid in introduc- WHAT MAY BE LEAl^NED FROM EOZOON 1 59 ing conditions more favourable to higher Hfe in the future. Our experience of the modern world shows us that all these conditions can be better fulfilled by the Protozoa than by any other creatures. They can live now equally in those great depths of ocean where the conditions are most unfavourable to other forms of life, and in tepid unhealthy pools overstocked with vegetable matter in a state of putridity. They form a most suitable basis for higher forms of life. They have re- markable powers of removing mineral matters from the waters and of fixing them in solid forms. So, in the fitness of things, a gigantic Foraminifer is just what we need, and after it has spread itself over the mud and rock of the primeval seas, and built up extensive reefs therein, other animals may be intro- duced, capable of feeding on it, or of sheltering themselves in its stony masses, and thus we have the appropriate dawn of animal life. But what are we to say of the cause of this new series of facts, so wonderfully superimposed upon the merely vegetable and mineral? Must it remain to us as an act of creation, or was it derived from some pre-existing matter in which it had been potentially present ? Science fails to inform us, but con- jectural " phylogeny " steps in and takes its place. Haeckel, the prophet of this new philosophy, waves his magic wand, and simple masses of sarcode spring from inorganic matter, and form diffused sheets of sea slime, from which are in time separated distinct amoeboid and foraminiferal forms. Ex- perience, however, gives us no facts whereon to build this supposition, and it remains neither more nor less scientific or certain than that old fancy of the Egyptians, which derived animals from the fertile mud of the Nile. If we fail to learn anything of the origin of Eozoon, and if its life processes are just as inscrutable as those of higher creatures, we can at least enquire as to its history in geolo- logical time. In this respect we find, in the first place, that l60 WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON the Protozoa have not had a monopoly in their profession of accumulators of calcareous rock. Originated by Eozoon in the old Laurentian time, this pro- cess has been proceeding throughout the geological ages ; and while Protozoa, equally simple with the great prototype of the race, have been and are continuing its function, and producing new limestones in every geological period, and so adding to the volume of the successive formations, new workers of higher grades have been introduced, capable of enjoying higher forms of animal activity, and equally of labouring at the great task of continent building; of existing, too, in seas less rich in mineral substances than those of the Eozoic time, and for that very reason better suited to higher and more skilled artists. It is to be observed in connection with this, that as the work of the Foraminifers has thus been assumed by others, their size and importance have diminished, and the larger forms of more recent times have some of them been fain to build up their hard parts of cemented sand instead of limestone. ^^'hen the marvellous results of recent deep-sea dredgings were first made known, and it was found that chalky foram- iniferal earth is yet accumulating in the Atlantic, with sponges and sea urchins, resembling in many respects those whose remains exist in the chalk, the fact was expressed by the state- ment that we still live in the chalk period. Thus stated the conclusion is scarcely correct. We do not live in the chalk period, but the conditions of the chalk period still exist in the deeper portions of the sea. We may say more than this. To some extent the conditions of the Laurentian period still exist in the sea, except in so far as they have been removed by the action of the Foraminifcra and other limestone builders. To those who can realize the enormous lapse of time involved in the geological history of the earth, this conveys an impression almost of eternity in the existence of this oldest of all the families of the animal kingdom. WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON l6l We are still more deeply impressed with this when we bring into view the great physical changes which have occurred since the dawn of life. When we consider that the skeletons of Eozoon contribute to form the oldest hills of our continents ; that they have been sealed up in solid marble, and that they are associated with hard crystalline rocks contorted in the most fantastic manner ; that these rocks have almost from the beginning of geological time been undergoing waste to supply the material of new formations ; that they have witnessed in- numerable subsidences and elevations of the continents ; and that the greatest mountain chains of the earth have been built up from the sea since Eozoon began to exist, — we acquire a most profound impression of the persistence of the lower forms of animal life, and know that mountains may be removed, and continents swept away and replaced, before the least of the humble gelatinous Protozoa can finally perish. Life may be a fleeting thing in the individual, but as handed down through successive generations of beings, and as a constant animating power in successive organisms, it appears, like its Creator, eternal. This leads to another and very serious question. How long did lineal descendants of Eozoon exist, and do they still exist ? We may for the present consider this question apart from ideas of derivation and elevation into higher planes of existence. Eozoon as a species, and even as a genus, may cease to exist with the Eozoic age, and we have no evidence whatever that any succeeding creatures are its modified descendants. As far as their structures inform us, they may as much claim to be original creations as Eozoon itself. Still descendants of Eozoon may have continued to exist, though we have not yet met with them. I should not be surprised to hear of a veritable speci- men being some day dredged alive in the Atlantic or the Pacific. It is also to be observed that in animals so simple as this many varieties may appear, widely different from the l62 WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON original. In these the general form and habit of life are the most likely things to change, the minute structures much less so. We need not, therefore, be surprised to find its descend- ants diminishing in size or altering in general form, while the characters of the fine tubulation and of the canal system would remain. We need not wonder if any sessile Foraminifer of the Nummuline group should prove to be a descendant of Eozoon. It would be less likely that a Sponge or a Foraminifer of the Rotaline type should originate from it. If one could only secure a succession of deep-sea limestones with Foraminifers extending all the way from the Laurentian to the present time, I can imagine nothing more interesting than to compare the whole series, with the view of ascertaining the limits of descent with variation, and the points where new forms are introduced. We have not yet such a series, but it may be obtained ; and as these creatures are eminently cosmopolitan, occurring over vastly wide areas of sea bottom, and are very variable, they would afford a better test of theories of derivation than any that can be obtained from the more locally distributed and less variable animals of higher grade. I was much struck with this recently, in examining a series of Foraminifera from the Cretaceous of Manitoba, and comparing them with the varietal forms of the same species in the interior of Nebraska, 500 miles to the south, and with those of the English chalk and of the modern seas. In all these different times and places wo had the same species. In all they existed under so many varietal forms passing into each other, that in former times every species had been multiplied by naturalists into several. Yet, in all, the identical varietal forms were repeated with the most minute markings the same. Here were at once constancy the most remarkable, and variations the most extensive. If we dwell on the one to the exclusion of the other, we reach only one-sided conclusions, imperfect and unsatisfactory. By taking both into connection we can alone reali/.c the full significance WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM E02OON 163 of the facts. We cannot yet obtain such series for all geological time ; but it may even now be worth while to enquire, What do we know as to any modification in the case of the primeval Foraminifers, whether with reference to the derivation from them of other Protozoa or of higher forms of life ? There is no link in geological fact to connect Eozoon with any of the Mollusks, Radiates, or Crustaceans of the succeed- ing Cambrian. What may be discovered in the future we can- not conjecture ; but at present these stand before us as distinct creations. It would of course be more probable that Eozoon should be the ancestor of some of the Foraminifera of the Primordial age, but strangely enough it is very dissimilar from all these, except Cryptozoum and some forms of Stromatopora; and here, as already stated, the evidence of minute structure fails to a great extent. Of actual facts, therefore, we have none ; and those evolutionists who have regarded the dawn animal as an evidence in their favour have been obliged to have recourse to supposition and assumption. We may imagine Eozoon itself, however, to state its experi- ence as follows : — " I, Eozoon Canadense, being a creature of low organization and intelligence, and of practical turn, am no theorist, but have a lively appreciation of such facts as I am able to perceive. I found myself growing upon the sea bottom, and know not whence I came. I grew and flourished for ages, and found no let or hindrance to my expansion, and abundance of food was always floated to me without my having to go in search of it. At length a change came. Certain creatures with hard snouts and jaws began to prey on me. \V'^hence they came I know not ; I cannot think that they came from the germs which I had dispersed so abundantly throughout the ocean. Unfortunately, just at the same time lime became a little less abundant in the waters, perhaps because of the great demands I myself had made, and thus it was not so easy as before to produce a thick supplemental skeleton for defence. l64 WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON So I had to give way. I have done my best to avoid extinc- tion ; but it is clear that I must at length be overcome, and must either disappear or subside into a humbler condition, and that other creatures better provided for the new conditions of the world must take my place." In such terms we may suppose that this patriarch of the seas might tell his history, and mourn his destiny, though he might also congratulate himself on hav- ing in an honest way done his duty and fulfilled his function in the world, leaving it to other and perhaps wiser creatures to dispute as to his origin and fate, while perhaps much less perfectly fulfilling the ends of their own existence. Thus our dawn animal has positively no story to tell as to its own introduction or its transmutation into other forms of existence. It leaves the mystery of creation where it was, but in connection with the subsequent history of life we can learn from it a little as to the laws which have governed the succes- sion of animals in geological time. First, we may learn that the plan of creation has been progressive, that there has been an advance from the few low and generalized types of the primeval ocean to the more numerous, higher, and more specialized types of more recent times. Secondly, we learn that the lower types, when first introduced, and before they were subordinated to higher forms of life, existed in some of their grandest modifications as to form and complexity, and that in succeeding ages, when higher types were replacing them, they were subjected to decay and degeneracy. Thirdly, we learn that while the species has a limited term of existence in geological time, any large type of animal existence, like that of the Foraminifera or Sponges, for example, once introduced, continues and finds throughout all the vicissitudes of the earth some appropriate residence. Fourthly, as to the mode of in- troduction of new types, or whether such creatures as Eozoon had any direct connection with the subsequent introduction of MoUusks, Worms, or Crustaceans, it is altogether silent, nor WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON 1 65 can it predict anything as to the order or manner of their introduction. Had we been permitted to visit the Laurentian seas, and to study Eozoon and its contemporary Protozoa when aHve, it is plain that we could not have foreseen or predicted from the consideration of such organisms the future development of life. No amount of study of the prototypal Foraminifer could have led us distinctly to the conception of even a Sponge or a Polyp, much less of any of the higher animals. Why is this ? The answer is that the improvement into such higher types does not take place by any change of the elementary sarcode, either in those chemical, mechanical, or vital properties which we can study, but in the adding to it of new structures. In the Sponge, which is perhaps the nearest type of all, we have the movable pulsating cilium and true animal cellular tissue, and along with this the spicular or fibrous skeleton, these structures leading to an entire change in the mode of life and subsistence. In the higher types of animals it is the same. Even in the highest we have white blood corpuscles and germinal matter, which, in so far as we know, carry on no higher forms of life than those of an Amoeba ; but they are now made subordinate to other kinds of tissues, of great variety and complexity, which never have been observed to arise out of the growth of any Protozoon. There would be only a few conceivable inferences which the highest finite intelligence could deduce as to the development of future and higher animals. He might infer that the Foraminiferal sarcode, once introduced, might be the substratum or founda- tion of other but unknown tissues in the higher animals, and that the Protozoon type might continue to subsist side by side with higher forms of living things, as they were successively introduced. He might also infer that the elevation of the animal kingdom would take place with reference to those new properties of sensation and voluntary motion in which the humblest animals diverge from the Hfe of the plant, s. E. 12 l66 WAHT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON It is important that these points should be clearly before our minds, because there has been current of late among natural- ists a loose way of writing with reference to them, which seems to have imposed on many who are not naturalists. It has been said, for example, that such an organism as Eozoon may include potentially all the structures and functions of the higher animals, and that it is possible that we might be able to infer or calculate all these with as much certainty as we can calcu- late an eclipse or any other physical phenomenon. Now, there is not only no foundation in fact for these assertions, but it is, from our present standpoint, not conceivable that they can ever be realized. The laws of inorganic matter give no data whence any a priori deductions or calculations could be made as to the structure and vital forces of the plant. The plant gives no data from which we can calculate the functions of the animal. The Protozoon gives no data from which we can calculate the specialties of the Mollusk, the Articulate, or the Vertebrate. Nor, unhappily, do the present conditions of life of themselves give us any sure grounds for predicting the new creations that may be in store for our old planet. Those who think to build a philosophy and even a religion on such data are mere dreamers, and have no scientific basis for their dogmas. They are as blind guides as our primaeval Protozoon himself would be in matters whose real solution lies in the harmony of our own higher and immaterial nature with the Being who is the Author of all life — the Father " from whom every family in heaven and earth is named."' Rf.fekences :—" Life's Dawn on Eailli." London, 18S5. Specimens of Eozoon in the Peter Redpath Museum, Montreal, 1888. THE APPARITION AND SUCCESS/ON OF ANIMAL FORMS. DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF THE EMINENT SWISS AND AMERICAN ZOOLOGIST LOUIS AGASSIZ, The Founder of the Modern School of American Biolcgv, AND OF SIR RICHARD OWEN, A Great and Phh.osophical Naturalist, TO whose Teaching I and very many Others owe our earliest introduction to the Principle of Homology IN THE Animal Kingdom. Modern Ideas of Derivation — Development of Animal Forms in Time — Various Theories of Derivation — History of Organic Types — History of Organs — Testimony of the Geological Record — Laws of the Succession — Development and Evolution — Evolu- tionist Theologians Old forms of Triloeites, from tlie Lower Cambrian (p. 173 el saj. Oleiielliis Thompsoui, Emmons. Apiostus vir, Matthew. Parndoxides regiua, Matthew. CHAPTER VII. THE APPARITION AND SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS. TIME was when naturalists were content to take nature as they found it, without any over-curious inquiries as to the origin of its several parts, or the changes of which they might be susceptible. Geology first removed this pleasant state of repose, by showing that all our present species had a beginning, and were preceded by others, and these again by others. Geologists were, however, too much occupied with the facts of the succession to speculate on the ultimate causes of the appearance and disappearance of species, and it re- mained for zoologists and botanists, or as some prefer to call themselves, biologists, to construct hypotheses or theories to account for the ascertained fact that successive dynasties of species have succeeded each other in time. I do not propose in this paper so much to deal with the various doctrines as to derivation and development now current, as to ask the ques- tion. What do we actually know as to the origin and history of life on our planet ? This great question, confessedly accompanied with many difficulties and still waiting for its full solution, has points of intense interest both for the Geologist and the Biologist. " If," says the great founder of the uniformitarian School of Geology, " the past duration of the earth be finite, then the aggregate of geological epochs, however numerous, must con- stitute a mere moment of the past, a mere infinitesimal portion of eternity." Yet to our limited vision, the origin of life fades 170 THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS away in the almost illimitable depths of past time, and we are ready to despair of ever reaching, by any process of discovery, to its first steps of progress. At what time did life begin ? In what form did dead matter first assume or receive those mysterious functions of growth, reproduction and sensation ? Only when we picture to ourselves an absolutely lifeless world, destitute of any germ of life or organization, can we realize the magnitude of these questions, and perceive how necessary it is to limit their scope if we would hope for any satisfactory answer. We may here dismiss altogether that form in which these questions present themselves to the biologist, when he experi- ments as to the evolution of living forms from dead liquids or solids attacking the unsolved problem of spontaneous genera- tion. Nor need we enter on the vast field of discussion as to modern animals and plants opened up by Darwin and others. I shall confine myself altogether to that historical or palreonto- logical aspect in which life presents itself when we study the fossil remains entombed in the sediments of the earth's crust, and which will enable me at least to show why some students of fossils hesitate to give in their adhesion to any of the cur- rent notions as to the origin of species. It will also be desir- able to avoid, as far as possible, the use of the term "evolution,'' as this has recently been employed in so many senses, whether of development or causation, as to have become nearly useless for any scientific purpose ; and that when I speak of creation of species, the term is to be understood not in the arbitrary sense forced on it by some modern writers, but as indicating the continuous introduction of new forms of life under definite laws, but by a power not emanating from within themsehes, nor from the inanimate nature surrounding them.^ ' The terms Derivalion, Development and Causatit)n have elear and definite meanings, and it is preferable, wherever possible, to use one or other of these. THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS I7I If we were to follow the guidance of those curious analogies which present themselves when we consider the growth of the individual plant or animal from the spore or the ovum, and the development of vegetable and animal life in geological time — analogies which, however, it must be borne in mind can have no scientific value whatever, inasmuch as that similarity of conditions which alone can give force to reasoning from an- alogy in matters of science, is wholly wanting — we should ex- pect to find in the oldest rocks embryonic forms alone, but of course embryonic forms suited to exist and reproduce them- selves independently.^ I need not say to palaeontologists that this is not what we actually find in the primordial rocks. I need but to remind them of the early and remarkable development of such forms as the Trilobites, the Lingulidce and the Pteropods, all of them highly complex and specialized types, and remote from the embryonic stages of the groups to which they severally belong. In the case of the Trilobites, one need merely consider the beautiful symmetry of their parts, both transversely and longi- tudinally, their division into distinct regions, the necessary com- plexity of their muscular and nervous systems, their highly complex visual organs, the superficial ornamentation and micro- scopic structure of their crusts, their advanced position among Crustaceans, indicated by their strong affinity with the Arach- nidans or spiders and .scorpions. (See figures prefixed.) ^ I may be pardoned for taking an example of the confusion of thought which this mode of reasoning has introduced into Biology from a clever article in the Contemporary written by a very able and much-esteemed biologist. He says : " The morphological distance between a newly hatched frog's tadpole and tiie adult fiog is almost as great as that between the adult lancelet and the newly hatched larva; of the lamprey." The "mor- phological distance" truly, but what of the physiological distance between the young and adult of the same animal and two adult animals between which is placed the great gulf of specific and generic diversity which w ith- in human experience neither has been known to pass ? 172 THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS All these characters give them an aspect far from embryonic, while, as Barrande has pointed out, this advanced position of the group has its significance greatly strengthened by the fact that in early primordial times we have to deal not with one species, but with a vast and highly differentiated group, embrac- ing forms of many and varied subordinate types. As we shall see, these and other early animals may be regarded as of generalized types, but not as embryonic. Here, then, meets us at the outset the fact that in as far as the great groups of annu- lose and molluscous animals are concerned, we can trace these back no farther than to a period in which they appear already highly advanced, much specialized and represented by many diverse forms. Either, therefore, these great groups came in on this high initial plane, or we have scarcely reached half way back in the life-history of our planet. We have, here, however, by this one consideration, attained at once to two great and dominant laws regulating the his- tory of life. First, the law of continuity, whereby new forms come in successively, throughout geological time, though, as we shall see, with periods of greater or less frequency. Secondly, the law of specialization of types, whereby general- ized forms are succeeded by those more special, and this pro- bably connected with the growing specialization of the inorganic world. It is this second law which causes the paralleHsm between the history of successive species and that of the embryo. We have already considered the claims which Eozoon and its contemporaries may urge to recognition, as beginnings of life ; but when we ascend from the Laurentian beds, we find ourselves in a barren series of conglomerates, sandstones, and other rocks, indicating shore rather than sea conditions, and remarkably destitute of indications of life. These are the Huronian beds, and possibly other series associated with them. They have afforded spicules of sponges, casts of burrows of THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS 1/3 worms, obscure forms, which may represent crustaceans or molhisks, markings of unknown origin, and some laminated forms which may perhaps represent remains of Eozoon, though their structures are imperfectly preserved. These are sufficient to show that marine life continued in some forms, and to en- courage the hope that a rich pre-Cambrian fauna may yet be discovered. But let us leave for the present the somewhat isolated case of Eozoon, and the few scattered forms of the Huronian, and go on farther to the early Cambrian fauna. This is graphi- cally presented to us in the sections in South Wales, as de- scribed by Hicks. Here we find a nucleus of ancient rocks, supposed to be T.aurentian, though in mineral character more nearly akin to the Huronian, but which have hitherto afforded no trace of fossils. Resting unconformably on these is a series of slates and sandstones, regarded as Lower Cambrian, the Caerfai group of Hicks, and which are the earliest holding organic remains. The lowest bed which contains indications of life is a red shale near the base of the series, which holds a few organic remains. The species are a Linguklla, worm bur- rows and a Trilobite.^ Supposing these to be all, it is remark- able that we have no Protozoa or Corals or Echinoderms, and that the types of Brachiopods and Crustaceans are of compara- tively modern affinities. Passing upward through i,ooo feet of barren sandstone and shale, we reach a zone in which many Trilobites of at least five genera are found, along with Pteropods, Brachiopods and Sponges. Thus it is that life comes in at the base of the Cambrian in ^^'ales, and it may be regarded as a fair specimen of the facts as they appear in the earlier fossiliferous beds succeeding the Laurentian. Taking the first of these groups of fossils, we may recognise in the worms representatives of those that still haunt our shores, in the Trilobite a Crustacean or Arachnoid of no mean grade. ' Probably of the genus Olenelliis. 174 THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS The Linguiella;, whether we regard them as moUuscoids, or, with Professor Morse, as singularly specialized worms, represent a peculiar and distinct type, handed down, through all the vicissitudes of the geological ages, to the present da)'. Had the Primordial life begun with species altogether inscrutable and unexampled in succeeding ages, this would no doubt have been mysterious ; but next to this is the mystery of the oldest forms of life being also among the newest. One great fact shines here with the clearness of noon-day. Whatever the origin of these creatures, they represent families which have endured till now in the struggle for existence without either elevation or degradation. Here, again, we may formulate an- other creative law. In every great group there are some forms much more capable of long continuance than others. Lingula among the Brachiopods is a marked instance. But when, with Hicks, we surmount the mass of barren beds underlying these remains, which from its unfossiliferous charac- ter is probably a somewhat rapid deposit of Arctic mud, like that which in all geological time has constituted the rough fill- ing of our continental formation.s, and have suddenly sprung upon us many genera of Trilobites, including the fewest-jointed and most many-jointed, the smallest and the largest of their race, our astonishment must increase, till we recognise the fact that we are now in the presence of another great law of creation, which provides that every new type shall be rapidly extended to the extreme limits of its power of adaptation. That this is not merely local is evidenced by the researches of Matthew and Walcott in the oldest Cambrian of America, where a similar succession occurs, but with this difference, that in the wider area presented by the American continent we find a greater variety of forms of life. Walcott records up to 1893 no less than 67 genera and 165 species in the oldest Cambrian of America. These include representatives of the Sponges, Hydroids, Corals, Echinoderms, Worms, Brachiopods, Bivalve THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS 1 75 and Univalve MoUusks and Crustaceans, or in other words, all the leading groups of invertebrate animals that we find in the sea at present. Of these the dominant group is the Crustaceans, including Trilobites, numbering one-third of the whole ; and these with the univalve MoUusks and the Brachiopods constitute the majority, the other groups having comparatively few species. What a marvellous incoming of life is here ! Walcott may well say that on the theory of gradual development we must suppose that life existed at a period far before the Cambrian — as far, indeed, as the Cambrian is before our own time. But this would mean that we know only half of the history of life ; and perhaps it is more reasonable to suppose that when the conditions became favourable, it came in with a rush. Before considering the other laws that may be inferred from these facts, however, let us in imagination transfer ourselves back to the Primordial age, and suppose that we have in our hands a living specimen of one of the larger Trilobites, recently taken from the sea, flapping vigorously its great tail, and full of life and energy ; an animal larger and heavier than the modern king-crab of our shores, furnished with all the complexity of external parts for which the crustaceans are so remarkable, and no doubt with instincts and feelings and modes of action as pro- nounced as those of its modern allies, and, if Woodward's views are correct, on a higher plane of rank than the king-crab itself, inasmuch as it is a composite type connecting Limuli with Isopods, and even with scorpions. We have obviously here, in the appearance of this great Crustacean or Arachnoid, a repe- tition of the facts which we met with in Eozoon ; but how vast the interval between them in geological time, and in zoological rank ! Standing in the presence of this testimony, I think it is only right to say that we possess no causal solution of the appearance of these early forms of life ; but in tracing them and their successors upward through the succeeding ages, we may hope at least to reach some expressions of the laws of 1/6 THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS their succession, in possession of which we may return to attack the mystery of their origin. First, it must strike every observer that there is a great same- ness of plan throughout the whole history of marine inverte- brate life. If we turn over the pages of an illustrated textbook of geology, or examine the cases or drawers of a collection of fossils, we shall find extending through every succeeding for- mation, representative forms of Crustaceans, Mollusks, Corals, etc., in such a manner as to indicate that in each successive period there has been a reproduction of the same type with modifications ; and if the series is not continuous, this appears to be due rather to abrupt physical changes ; since sometimes, where two formations pass into each other, we find a gradual change in the fossils by the dropping out and introduction of species one by one. Thus, in the whole of the great Palaeozoic Period, both in its Fauna and Flora, we have a continuity and similarity of a most marked character. It is evident that there is presented to us in this similarity of the forms of successive faunas and floras, a phenomenon which deserves very careful sifting as to the question of identity or diversity of species. The data for its comprehension must be obtained by careful study of the series of closely allied forms occurring in successive formations, and the great and undisturbed areas of the older rocks in America seem to give special facilities for this, which should be worked, not in the direction of constituting new species for every slightly diver- gent form, but in striving to group these forms into large specific types. ^ There is nothing to preclude the supposition that some of the groups mentioned in the note are really specific types, with ^ The Rynchonella; of Ihe type of R. plena, the Oi tbids, of the type of O. testiuiinaria, the Strophouienie of the types of 6". (7//tV7/aAi ancKS". Rhom- boidalis, the Atrypne of tlie type of -•/. rdicuhiiis, furnish cases in point among the Brachiopods. THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS 1 7/ numerous race modifications. My own provisional conclusion, based on the study of Palaeozoic plants, is that the general law will be found to be the existence of distinct specific types, in- dependent of each other, but liable in geological time to a great many modifications, which have often been regarded as distinct species.^ While this unity of successive faunae at first sight presents an appearance of hereditary succession, it loses much of this character when we consider the number of new types introduced without apparent predecessors, the necessity that there should be similarity of type in successive faunae on any hypothesis of a continuous plan ; and above all, the fact that the recurrence of representative species or races in large proportion marks times of decadence rather than of expansion in the types to which they belong. To turn to another period, this is very manifest in that singular resemblance which obtains between the modern mammals of South America and Australia, and their immediate fossil predecessors — the phenomenon being here manifestly that of decadence of large and abundant species into a few depauperated representatives. This will be found to be a very general law, elevation being accompanied by the apparent abrupt appearance of new types and decadence by the apparent continuation of old species, or modifications of them. This resemblance with difference in successive faunas also connects itself very directly with the successive elevations and depressions of our continental plateaus in geological time. Every great Palaeozoic limestone, for example, indicates a depression with succeeding elevation. On each elevation marine animals were driven back into the ocean, and on each depression swarmed in over the land, reinforced by new species, either then introduced, or derived by migration from other localities. In like manner, on every depression, land ' "Geological History of Plants." 178 THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS plants and animals were driven in upon insular areas, and on re-elevation, again spread themselves widely. Now I think it will be found to be a law here that periods of expansion were eminently those of introduction of new specific types, and periods of contraction those of extinction, and also of continu- ance of old types under new varietal forms. It must also be noticed that all the leading types of in- vertebrate life were early introduced, that change within these was necessarily limited, and that elevation could take place mainly by the introduction of the vertebrate orders. So in plants. Cryptogams early attained their maximum as well as GymnospermSj and elevation occurred in the introduction of Phsenogams, and this not piecemeal, but as we shall see in a succeeding chapter, in great force at once. We may further remark the simultaneous appearance of like types of life in one and the same geological period, over widely separated regions of the earth's surface. This strikes us es- pecially in the comparatively simple and homogeneous life- dynasties of the Palaeozoic, when, for example, we find the same types of Silurian Graptolites, Trilobites and Brachiopods ap- pearing simultaneously in Australia, America and Europe. Perhaps in no department is it more impressive than in the introduction of the Devonian and Carboniferous Ages of that grand cryptogamous and gymnospermous flora which ranges from Brazil to Spitzbergen, and from Australia to Scotland, accompanied in all by^the same groups of marine invertebrates. Such facts may depend either on that long life of specific types which gives them ample time to spread to all possible habitats, before their extinction, or on some general law where- by the conditions suitable to similar types of life emerge at one time in all parts of the world. Both causes may be influential, as the one does not exclude the other, and there is reason to believe that both are natural facts. Should it be ultimately proved that species allied and representative, but distinct in THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS 179 origin, come into being simultaneously everywhere, we shall arrive at one of the laws of creation, and one probably con- nected with the gradual change of the physical conditions of the world. Another general truth, obvious from the facts which have been already collected, is the periodicity of introduction of species. They come in by bursts or flood tides at particular points of time, while these great life waves are followed and preceded by times of ebb in which little that is new is being produced. We labour in our investigation of this matter under the disadvantage that the modern period is evidently one of the times of pause in the creative work. Had our time been that of the early Tertiary or early Mesozoic, our views as to the question of origin of species might have been very dif- ferent. It is a striking fact, in illustration of this, that since the glacial age no new species of mammal, except, possibly, man himself, can be proved to have originated on our continents, while a great number of large and conspicuous forms have disappeared. It is possible that the proximate or secondary causes of the ebb and flow of life production may be in part at least physical, but other and more important efficient causes may be behind these. In any case these undulations in the history of life are in harmony with much that we see in other departments of nature. It results from the above and the immediately preceding statement, that specific and generic types enter on the stage in great force, and gradually taper off towards extinction. They should so appear in the geological diagrams made to illustrate the succession of living beings. This applies even to those forms of life which come in with fewest species and under the most humble guise. What a remarkable swarming, for ex- ample, there must have been of Marsupial Mammals in the early Mesozoic, and in the Coal formation the only known Pulmonate snails, five or six in number, belong to four generic S. E. 13 l8o THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS types, while the Myriapods and Amphibians ahke appear in a crowd of generic forms. I have already referred to the permanence of species in geological time. We may now place this in connection with the law of rapid origination and more or less continuous transmission of varietal forms. A good illustration will be afforded by a group of species with which I am very familiar, that which came into our seas at the beginning of the Glacial age, and still exists. With regard to their permanence, it can be affirmed that the shells now elevated in Wales to 1,200, and in Canada to 600 feet above the sea, and which lived be- fore the last great revolution of our continents — a period very remote as compared with human history — differ in no tittle from their modern successors after hundreds or thousands of generations. It can also be afifirmed that the more variable species appear under precisely the same varietal forms then as now, though these varieties have changed much in their local distribution. The real import of these statements, which might also be made with regard to other groups, well known to pale- ontologists, is of so great significance that it can be realized only after we have thought of the vast time and numerous changes through which these humble creatures have survived. I may call in evidence here a familiar New England animal, the common sand clam, Jlfva arenaria, and its relative Mya fniiicaia, the short sand clam, which now inhabit together all the northern seas ; for the Pacific specimens, from Japan and California, though differently named, are undoubtedly the same. Alva tritncata appears in Europe in the Coralline Crag, and was followed by M. arenaria in the Jvcd Crag. Both shells occur in the Pleistocene of America, and their several varietal forms had already developed themselves in the Crag, and re- main the same to-day ; so that these humble mollusks, littoral in their habits, and subjected to a great variety of conditions, have continued for a very long period to construct their shells THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS l8l precisely as at present ; while in many places, as on the Lower St. Lawrence, we find them living together on the same banks, and yet preserving their distinctness. ^ Nor are there any in- dications of a transition between the two species. I might make similar statements with regard to the Astartes, Bucci- nums and Tellinje of the drift, and could illustrate them by extensive series of specimens from my own collections. Another curious illustration is that presented by the Tertiary and modern faunce of some oceanic islands far separated from the continents. In ALadeira and Porto Santo, for example, according to Lyell, we have fifty-six species of land shells in the former, and forty-two in the latter, only twelve being com- mon to the two, though these islands are only thirty miles apart. Now in the Pliocene strata of Madeira and Porto Santo we find thirty-six species in the former, and thirty-five in the latter, of which only eight per cent, are extinct, and yet only eight are common to the two islands. Further, there seem to be no transitional forms connecting the species, and of some of them the same varieties existed in the Pliocene as now. The main difference in time is the extinction of some species and the introduction of others without known connect- ing links, and the fact that some species, plentiful in the Pliocene, are rare now, and vice versa. All these shells differ from those of modern Europe, but some of them are allied to Miocene species of that continent. Here we have a case of continued existence of the same forms, and in circumstances which, the more we think of them, the more do they defy all our existing theories as to specific origins. Perhaps some of the most remarkable facts in connection with the permanence of varietal forms of species are those furnished by that magnificent flora which burst in all its majesty on the American continent in the Cretaceous period, and still survives among us, even in some of its specific types. ' Paper in Record of Science, on Shells at Little Metis. 1 82 THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS I say survives ; for we have but a remnant of its forms living, and comparatively little that is new has probably been added since. The confusion which has obtained as to the age of this flora, and its mistaken reference to the Miocene Tertiary, have arisen in part from the fact that this modern flora was in its earlier times contemporary with Cretaceous animals, and survived the gradual change from the animal life of the Creta- ceous down to that of the Eocene, and even of the Miocene. In collections of these plants, from what may be termed beds of transition from the Cretaceous to the Tertiary, we find many plants of modern species, or so closely related that they may be mere varietal forms. Some of these v. ill be mentioned in the next paper, and they show that modern plants, some of them small and insignificant, others of gigantic size, reach back to a time when the Mesozoic Dinosaurs were becoming extinct, and the earliest Placental mammals being introduced. Shall we say that these plants have propagated themselves unchanged for half a million of years, or more ? ' Take from the western Mesozoic a contrasting yet illustrative fact. In the lowest Cretaceous rocks of Queen Charlotte's Island, Mr. Richardson and Dr. G. M. Dawson find Ammon- ites and allied Cephalopods similar in many respects to those discovered farther south by the California Survey, and Mr. Whiteaves finds that some of them are apparently not distinct from species described by the Palteontologists of the Geological Survey of British India. On both sides of the Pacific these shells lie entombed in solid rock, and the Pacific rolls between, as of yore. Yet these species, genera, and even families are all extinct — why, no man can tell, while land plants that must have come in while the survivors of these Cephalopods still lived, reach down to the present. How mysterious is all this, ^ Among these are living species of ferns, one of tliem our common " Sensitive Fern," of Eastern America, two species of Hazel still extant, and Sequoias or giant pines, like those now surviving in California. THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS 1 83 and how strongly does it show the independence in some sense of merely physical agencies on the part of the manifestations of life ! We have naturally been occupied hitherto with the lower tribes of animals and with plant life, because these are pre- dominant in the early ages of the earth. Let us turn now to the history of vertebrate or back-boned animals, which presents some peculiarities special to itself. Many years ago Pander ^ described and figured from the Cambro-silurian of Russia, a number of minute teeth, some conical and some comb-like, which he referred to fishes, and to that low form of the fish type represented by the modern lampreys. Much doubt was thrown on this determination, more especially as the teeth seemed to be composed not of bone earth, but of carbonate of lime, and it was suggested that they may have belonged to marine worms, or to the lingual ribbons of Gastropod mol- lusks. Some confirmatory evidence seems to have been sup- plied by the discovery of great numbers of similar forms in the shales of the coal formation of Ohio, by the late Dr. Newberry. I have had an ojiportunity to examine these, and find that they consist of calcium phosphate,- or bone earth, and that their microscopic structure is not dissimilar from that of the teeth of some of the smaller sharks (Uiplodus) found with them. I have therefore been inclined to believe that there may have already been, even in the Cambrian or Lower Silurian seas, true fishes, related partly to the lampreys and partly to sharks ; so that the history of the back-boned animals may have gone nearly as far back as that of their humbler relations. This conjecture has recently received further support from the discovery in rocks of Lower Silurian age, in Colorada of a veritable bone bed, rich in fragmentary remains of fishes. ' More recently Rohan has described conical teeth (St. Petersburg Academy, 18S9), but I have not seen his paper. - Analysis of Dr. B. J. Harrington. 184 THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS They are unfortunately so comminuted as to resemble the debris of the food of some larger animal ; but in so far as I can judge from specimens kindly given to me/ they resemble the bony coverings of some of the familiar fishes of the Devonian. Thus they would indicate, with Pander's and Rohan's speci- mens, already two distinct types of fishes as existing almost as early as the higher invertebrates of the sea. In the Silurian (Upper Silurian of Murchison) we have un- doubted evidence of the same kind, on both sides of the Atlantic, in teeth and spines of sharks, and the plates which protected the heads and bodies of the plate-covered fishes (Placo-ganoids). But it is in the Devonian that these types appear to culminate, and we have added to them that remark- able type of " lung fish," as the Germans call them, represented in our modern world only by the curious and exceptional Burramunda of Australia, and the mud fishes of Africa and South America,^ creatures which show, as do some of the mailed fishes, or ganoids, of equally great age, the intermediate stages between a swimming bladder and a lung, and thus ap- proach nearer to the air-breathing animals than any other fishes. Many years ago, in "Acadian Geology," I referred to the probability that the mailed and lung fishes of the Devonian and Carboniferous possessed airb ladders so constructed as to enable them to breathe air, as is the case with their modern representatives. In the modern species this, no doubt, enables them to haunt badly aerated waters, in swamps and sluggish streams, and in some cases even to survive when the water in which they live is dried up. In the Carboniferous and Devonian it may have served a similar purpose, litting them to inhabit the lagoons and creeks of the coal swamps, the water of which must often have been badly aerated. It makes against this that some sharks followed them into these waters, 1 By Mr. F. D. Adams ami Dr. Walcott. - Ceratodus, Lipidosiren, Protopterus. '"'^'^^^OfloaaBOO^^^ Two Primitive VERTEiiRATFS, PalaosponJylns (enlarged) and PtirkhtJnis (reduced), (After Woodward, with some modifications.) THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS 1 85 and the modern sharks have no swim-bladders. Possibly, however, the sharks habitually haunted the open sea, and only made occasional raids on the dangerous waters tenanted by the ganoids. It is also true that only certain genera of sharks are found to be represented in the carbonaceous shales, and they may have differed in this respect from the ordinary forms of the order. It has been suggested that only a small change would be necessary to enable some of these lung fishes to become Batrachians, and no doubt this is the nearest approach of the fish to the reptile ; but we have not yet found connecting links sufficient to bridge over the whole distance. The plate-bearing ganoids of the Silurian and Devonian, at one time supposed to be allied to Crustaceans, but whose dignity as " Forerunners of the back-boned animals "' is now generally admitted,^ are clearly true fishes, and of somewhat high rank, their strange bony armour being evidently a special protection against the attacks of contemporary sharks and gigantic crustaceans ; and if we may judge by the Colorado specimens, their existence dates back almost to the close of the Cambrian, and they were probably contemporary with small sharks ; while as early as the Silurian and Devonian, if we regard the scaly ganoids as a distinct type, we have already four types of fishes, and these akin to those which in modern time Ave must regard as the highest of their class. One very little fish of the Devonian, of which specimens have been kindly sent me by a friend in Scotland,^ the Pala^o- ' A. Smith Woodward, " Natuial Science," 1892, and Annals and Alaga. Nat. Hist,, October, 1S90. This able naturaHst, in introducing his subject, remarks, from the point of view of an evolutionist : — "Whether some form of 'v/orm' gave origin to the forerunners of the great back-boned race, or whether a primeval relative of the King-crab turned upside down and rearranged limbs and head — these are questions still admitting of endless discussion, no doubt fruitless in their main object, liut desirable from the new lines of investigation they continually suggest." - James Reed, Esq., of Allan House, Blairgowrie. 1 86 THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS spondylus of Traquair, may raise still higher hopes for the early vertebrates. It is a little creature, an inch to two inches in length, destitute or nearly destitute of bony covering, having a head which suggests the presence of external gills, large eyes, and even elongated nasal bones,^ a long vertebral column composed of separate bony rings, more than fifty in number, with possible indications of ribs in front and distinct neural and haemal processes behind. One cannot look at it with- out the suggestion occurring of some of the smaller snake- like Batrachians of the Carboniferous and Permian ; and I should not be surprised if it should come to be regarded either as a forerunner of the Batrachians or as a primitive tadpole. However this may be, the upper part of the Devonian, though rich in fishes and plants, has afforded no higher vertebrates than its lower parts, and in the lowest Carboniferous beds we suddenly find ourselves in the presence of Batrachians with well-developed limbs and characters which ally them to the Lizards. True lizard-like reptiles appear in the Permian, and then we enter on that marvellous reign of reptiles, in which this class assumed so many great and remarkable forms, and asserted itself in a manner of which the now degraded reptilian class can afford no conception. The mammals and birds make their first appearance quietly in small and humble forms in the reign of reptiles, in which there was little place left for them by the latter ; but the mammals burst upon us in all their number and magnitude in the Eocene and Miocene, jn which quadrupedal mammalian life may be said to have culminated in grandeur, variety, and geographical distribution ; far excelling in these respects the time in which we live. The development in time of the back-boned animals thus stands in some degree by itself; but it illustrates the same ' I .im aware that Woodward regards these parts differently. THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS 1 8/ laws of early generalised types, and sudden and wide introduc- tion of new forms, which we have seen in the case of the in- vertebrates and the plants. Such facts as those to which I have referred, and many others, which want of space prevents me from noticing, are in one respect eminently unsatisfactory, for they show us how difficult must be any attempts to explain the origin and succes- sion of life. For this reason they are quietly put aside or explained away in most of the current hypotheses on the sub- ject. But we must, as men of science, face these difficulties, and be content to search for facts and laws, even if they should prove fatal to preconceived views. A group of new laws, indeed, here breaks upon us. (i) The great vitality and rapid extension and variation of new specific types. (2) The law of spontaneous decay and mor- tality of species in time. (3) The law of periodicity and of simultaneous appearance of many allied forms. (4) The abrupt entrance and slow decay of groups of species. (5) The extremely long duration of some species in time. (6) The grand march of new forms landwards, and upwards in rank. Such general truths deeply impress us at least with the conclu- sion that we are tracing, not a fortuitous succession, but the action of power working by law. I have thus far said nothing of the bearing of the prevalent ideas of descent with modification on this wonderful pro- cession of life. None of these, of course, can be expected to take us back to the origin of living beings ; but they also fail to explain why so vast numbers of highly organized species struggle into existence simultaneously in one age and disappear in another, why no continuous chain of succession in time can be found gradually blending species into each other, and why, in the natural succession of things, degradation under the influence of external conditions and final extinction seem to be laws of organic existence. It is useless here to appeal to the 1 88 THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS imperfection of tlie record, or to tine movements or migrations of species. Tlie record is now, in many important parts, too complete, and the simultaneousness of the entrance of the faunas and floras too certainly established, and moving species from place to place only evades the difficulty. The truth is that such hypotheses are at present premature, and that we require to have larger collections of fiicts. Independently of this, however, it appears to me that from a philosophical i)oint of view it is extremely probable that all theories of evolution, as at present applied to life, are fundamentally defective in being too partial in their character; and perhaps I cannot better group the remainder of the facts to which I wish to refer than by using them to illustrate this feature of most of our attempts at generalization on this subject. First, then, these hypotheses are too partial, in their tendency to refer numerous and complex phenomena to one cause, or to a few causes only, when all trustworthy analogy would indicate that they must result from many concurrent forces and deter- minations of force. We have all, no doubt, read those ingenious, not to say amusing, speculations in which some entomologists and botanists have indulged with reference to the mutual relations of flowers and suctorial insects. Geologically the facts oblige us to begin with Cryptogamous plants and chewing insects, and out of the desire of insects for non-existent honey, and the adaptations of plants to the requirements of non- existent suctorial apparatus, we have to evolve the marvellous complexity of floral form and colouring, and the exquisitely delicate apparatus of the mouths of haustellate insects. Now. when it is borne in mind that this theory implies a mental con- fusion on our part precisely similar to that which, in the depart- ment of mechanics, actuates the seekers for perpetual motion, that we have not the smallest tittle of evidence that the changes required have actually occurred in any one case, and that the thousands of other structures and relations of the plant and the THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS 1 89 insect have to be worked out by a series of concurrent develop- ments so complex and absolutely incalculable in the aggregate, that the cycles and epicycles of the Ptolemaic astronomy were child's play in comparison, we need not wonder that the com- mon sense of mankind revolts against such fancies, and that we are accused of attempting to construct the universe by methods that would baffle Omnipotence itself, because they are simply absurd. In this aspect of them, indeed, such speculations are necessarily futile, because no mind can grasp all the com- plexities of even any one case, and it is useless to follow out an imaginary line of development which unexplained facts must contradict at every step. This is also, no doubt, the reason why all recent attempts at constructing " Phylogenies " are so changeable, and why no two experts can agree about almost any of them. A second aspect in which such speculations are too partial, is in the unwarranted use which they make of analogy. It is not unusual to find such analogies as that between the em- bryonic development of the individual animal and the succes- sion of animals in geological time placed on a level with that reasoning from analogy by which geologists apply modern causes to explain geological formations. No claim could be more unfounded. When the geologist studies ancient lime- stones built up of the remains of corals, and then applies the phenomena of modern coral reefs to explain their origin, he brings the latter to bear on the former by an analogy which in- cludes not merely the apparent results, but the causes at work, and the conditions of their action, and it is on this that the validity of his comparison depends, in so far as it relates to similarity of mode of formation. But when we compare the development of an animal from an embryo cell with the pro- gress of animals in time, though we have a curious analogy as to the steps of the process, the conditions and causes at work are known to be altogether dissimilar, and therefore we have no 190 THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS evidence whatever as to identity of cause, and our reasoning becomes at once the most transparent of fallacies. P'urther, we have no right here to overlook the fact that the conditions of the embryo are determined by those of a previous adult, and that no sooner does this hereditary potentiality produce a new adult animal, than the terrible external agencies of the physical world, in presence of which all life exists, begin to tell on the organism, and after a struggle of longer or shorter duration it succumbs to death, and its substance returns into inorganic nature, a law from which even the longer life of the species does not seem to exempt it. All this is so plain and manifest that it is extraordinary that evolutionists will continue to use such partial and imperfect arguments. Another illustration may be taken from that application of the doctrine of natural selection to explain the introduction of species in geological time, which is so elaborately discussed by Sir C. Lyell in the last edition of his " Principles of Geology." The great geolo- gist evidently leans strongly to the theory, and claims for it the " highest degree of probability," yet he perceives that there is a serious gap in it ; since no modern fact has ever proved the origin of a new species by modification. Such a gap, if it existed in those grand analogies by which he explained geo- logical formations through modern causes, would be admitted to be fatal. A third illustration of the partial character of these hypo- theses may be taken from the use made of the theory deduced from modern physical discoveries, that life must be merely a product of the continuous operation of physical laws. The assumption — for it is nothing more — that the phenomena of life- are produced merely by some arrangement of physical forces, even if it be admitted to be true, gives only a partial explana- tion of the possible origin of life. It docs not account for the fact that life, as a force, or combination of forces, is set in antagonism to all other forces. It does not account for the THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS IQI marvellous connection of life with organization. It does not account for the determination and arrangement of forces implied in life. A very simple illustration may make this plain. If the problem to be solved were the origin of the mariner's compass, one might assert that it is wholly a physical arrangement, both as to matter and force. Another might assert that it involves mind and intelligence in addition. In some sense both would be right. The properties of magnetic force and of iron or steel are purely physical, and it might even be within the bounds of possibility that somewhere in the universe a mass of natural loadstone may have been so balanced as to swing in harmony with the earth's magnetism. Yet we would surely be regarded as very credulous if we could be in- duced to believe that the mariner's compass has originated in that way. This argument applies with a thousandfold greater force to the origin of life, which involves even in its simplest forms so many more adjustments of force and so much more complex machinery. Fourthly, these hypotheses are partial, inasmuch as they fail to account for the vastly varied and correlated interdepen- dencies of natural things and forces, and for the unity of plan which pervades the whole. These can be explained only by taking into the account another element from without. Even when it professes to admit the existence of a God, the evolu- tionist reasoning of our day contents itself altogether with the physical or visible universe, and leaves entirely out of sight the power of the unseen and spiritual, as if this were something with which science has nothing to do, but which belongs only to imagination or sentiment. So much has this been the case, that when recently a few physicists and naturalists have referred to the " Unseen Universe," they have seemed to be teaching new and startling truths, though only reviving some of the oldest and most permanent ideas of our race. From the dawn of human thought it has been the conclusion alike of philoso- 192 THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS phers, theologians, and the common sense of mankind, that the seen can be explained only by reference to the unseen, and that any merely physical theory of the world is necessarily partial. This, too, is the position of our sacred Scriptures, and is broadly stated in their opening verse, and indeed it lies alike at the basis of all true religion and all sound philosophy, for it must necessarily be that "the things that are seen are temporal, the things that are unseen, eternal." With reference to the primal aggregation of energy in the visible universe, with refer- ence to the introduction of life, with reference to the soul of man, with reference to the heavenly gifts of genius and pro- phecy, with reference to the introduction of the Saviour Himself into the world, and with reference to the spiritual gifts and graces of God's people, all these spring, not from sporadic acts of intervention, but from the continuous action of God and the unseen world ; and this, we must never forget, is the true ideal of creation in Scripture and in sound theology. Only in such exceptional and little influential philosophies as that of Demo- critus, and in the speculations of a few men carried off their balance by the brilliant physical discoveries of our age, has this necessarily partial and imperfect view been adopted. Never, indeed, was its imperfection more clear than in the light of modern science. Geology, by tracing back all present things to their origin, was the first science to establish on a basis of observed facts the necessity of a beginning and end of the world. But even physical science now teaches us that the visible universe is a vast machine for the dissipation of energy; that the processes going on in it must have had a beginning in time, and that all things tend to a final and helpless equilibrium. This necessity implies an unseen power, an invisible universe, in which the visible universe must have originated, and to which its energy is ever returning. The hiatus between the seen and the unseen may be bridged over by the conceptions of atoiuic vortices of THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS I93 force, and by the universal and continuous ether ; but whether or not, it has become clear that the conception of the unseen, as existing, has become necessary to our belief in the possible existence of the pliysical universe itself, even without taking life into account. It is in the domain of life, hov^-ever, that this necessity be- comes most apparent ; and it is in the plant that we first clearly perceive a visible testimony to that unseen which is the counterpart of the seen. Life in the plant opposes the out- ward rush of force in our system, arrests a part of it on its way, fixes it as potential energy, and thus, forming a mere eddy, so to speak, in the process of dissipation of energy, it accumu- lates that on which animal life and man himself may subsist, and assert for a time supremacy over the seen and temporal on behalf of the unseen and eternal. I say, for a time, because life is, in the visible universe, as at present constituted, but a temporary exception, introduced from that unseen world where it is no longer the exception but the eternal rule. In a still higher sense, then, than that in which matter and force testify to a Creator, organization and life, whether in the plant, the animal, or man, bear the same testimony, and exist as outposts put forth in the succession of ages from that higher heaven that surrounds the visible universe. In them, too, Almighty power is no doubt conditioned or limited by law ; yet they bear more distinctly upon them the impress of their Maker, and, while all explanations of the physical universe which refuse to recognise its spiritual and unseen origin must necessarily be partial and in the end incomprehensible, this destiny falls more quickly and surely on the attempt to account for life and its succession on merely materialistic principles. Here again, however, we must bear in mind that creation, as maintained against such materialistic evolution, whether by theology, philosophy, or Holy Scripture, is necessarily a con- tinuous, nay, an eternal, influence, not an intervention of dis- .s. E. 14 194 THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS connected acts. It is the true continuity, which inckides and binds together all other continuity. It is here that natural science meets with theology, not as an antagonist, but as a friend and ally in its time of greatest need ; and I must here record my belief that neither men of science nor theologians have a right to separate what God in Holy Scripture has joined together, or to build up a wall between nature and religion, and write upon it, " no thorough- fare." The science that does this must be impotent to explain nature, and without hold on the higher sentiments of man. The theology that does this must sink into mere superstition. In conclusion, can we formulate a few of the general laws, or perhaps I had better call them the general conclusions, respecting life, in which all Palaeontologists may agree. Per- haps it is not possible to do this at present satisfactorily, but the attempt may do no harm, ^^'e may, then, I think, make the following afifirmations : — 1. The existence of life and organization on the earth is not eternal, or even coeval with the beginning of the physical uni- verse, but may possibly date from Laurentian or immediately pre-Laurentian ages. 2. The introduction of new species of animals and plants has been a continuous process, not necessarily in the sense of derivation of one species from another, but in the higher sense of the continued operation of the cause or causes which intro- duced life at first. This, as already stated, I take to be the true theological or Scriptural as well as scientific idea of what we ordinarily and somewhat loosely term creation. 3. Though thus continuous, the process has not been uni- form ; but periods of rapid production of species have alter- nated with others in which many disappeared and few were introduced. This may have been an effect of physical cycles reacting on the progress of life. 4. Species, like individuals, have greater energy ami \ iuility in THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS 1 95 their younger stages, and rapidly assume all their varietal forms, and extend themselves as widely as external circumstances will permit. Like individuals also, they have their periods of old age and decay, though the life of some species has been of enormous duration in comparison with that of others ; the difference appearing to be connected with degrees of adaptation to different conditions of life. 5. Many allied species, constituting groups of animals and plants, have made their appearance at once in various parts of the earth, and these groups have obeyed the same laws with the individual and the species in culminating rapidly, and then slowly diminishing, though a large group once introduced has rarely disappeared altogether. 6. Groups of species, as genera and orders, do not usually begin with their highest or lowest forms, but with intermediate and generalized types, and they show a capacity for both eleva- tion and degradation in their subsequent history. 7. The history of life presents a progress from the lower to the higher, and from the simpler to the more complex, and from the more generalized to the more specialized. In this progress new types are introduced, and take the place of the older ones, which sink to a relatively subordinate place, and become thus degraded. But the physical and organic changes have been so correlated and adjusted that life has not only always maintained its existence, but has been enabled to assume more complex forms, and thus older forms have been made to prepare the way for newer, so that there has been, on the whole, a steady elevation culminating in man himself. Elevation and specialization have, however, been secured at the expense of vital energy and range of adaptation, until the new element of a rational and inventive nature was introduced only in the case of man. 8. In regard to the larger and more distinct types, we cannot find evidence that they have, in their introduction, 196 THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS been preceded by similar forms connecting them with previous groups ; but there is reason to beheve that many supposed representative species in successive formations are really only races or varieties. 9. In so far as we can trace their history, specific types are permanent in their characters from their introduction to their extinction, and their earlier varietal forms are similar to their later ones. 10. Palaeontology furnishes no direct evidence, perhaps never can furnish any, as to the actual transformation of one species into another, or as to the actual circumstances of creation of a species ; but the drift of its testimony is to show that species come in per saltiim, rather than by any slow and gradual process. 11. The origin and history of life cannot, any more than the origin and determination of matter and force, be explained on purely material grounds, but involve the consideration of power referable to the unseen and spiritual world. Different minds may state these principles in different ways, but I believe that in so far as palaeontology is concerned, in substance they must hold good, at least as steps to higher truths. And now allow me to say that we should be thankful that it is given to us to deal with so great questions, and that in doing so, deep humiliation, earnest seeking for truth, patient collection of all facts, self-denying abstinence from hasty generalizations, forbearance and generous estimation with regard to our fellow labourers, and reliance on that Divine Spirit which has breathed into us our intelligent life, and is the source of all true wisdom, arc the qualities which best be- come us. But while the principles noted above may be said to be known laws of the apparition of new forms of life, they do not reach to the secondary efficient causes of the introduction of new species. "What these may ultimately prove to be, to THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS IQ/ what extent they can be known by us, and to what extent they may include processes of derivation, it is impossible now to say. At present we must recognise in the prevailing theories on the subject merely the natural tendency of the human mind to grasp the whole mass of the unknown under some grand general hypothesis, which, though perhaps little else than a figure of speech, satisfies for the moment. We are dealing with the origin of species precisely as the alchemists did with chemistry, and as the Plutonists and Neptunists did with geology ; but the hypotheses of to-day may be the parents of investigations which will become real science to-morrow. In the meantime it is safe to affirm that whatever amount of truth there may be in the several hypotheses which have engaged our attention, there is a creative force above and beyond them, and to the threshold of which we shall inevitably be brought, after all their capabilities have been exhausted by rigid in- vestigation of facts. It is also consolatory to know that species, in so far as the Modern period, or any one past geo- logical period may be concerned, are so fixed that for all practical purposes they may be regarded as unchanging. They are to us what the planets in their orbits are to the astronomer, and speculations as to the origin of species are merely our nebular hypotheses as to the possible origin of worlds and systems. References : — Address as Vice-President of American Associalioii at Detroit, 1875. " Tlie Chain of Life in Geological Time," London, 1879. Addresses to Natural History Society of Montreal, published in Canadian A'atnralist, "Apparition of Animal Yovm^," PiincetoJi /\e7'ici<.'. THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS. DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF DR. OSWALD HEER, The Able and Successful Student of the later Flokas OF THE Northern Hemisphere. Geologicai, Periods as Related to Plants — Arctic Orioix OF Floras — The Devonl\n Fi ora — Arctic CLnL\TES OF the Past — History of Some Modern Forms — Laws of the Succession Win W* Vegetation of the Middle Devonian or Erian, restored from actual specimens (p. 202). CHAPTER VIII. THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS. IF, for convenience of reference, we divide the whole history of the earth, from the time when a sohd crust first formed on its surface and began to be ridged up into islands or moun- tains in the primeval ocean, into four great periods, we shall find that each can be characterized by some features in relation to the world of plants. That Archean age, in which the oldest known beds of rocks were produced — rocks now greatly crumpled by the first move- ments of the thin crust, and hardened and altered by heat and pressure — has, it is true, little to tell us. But, as elsewhere stated, even it has beds of Carbon in the form of Graphite — veritable altered coal seams — which the analogy of later forma- tions would lead us to believe must have been accumulated by the growth of plants. This growth is indeed the only known cause capable of producing such effects. If we should ever be fortunate enough to find beds of the Laurentian series in an unaltered state, we may hope to know something of this old flora. Nor need we be surprised if it should prove of higher grade and more noble development than we should at first sight anticipate. If there ever was a time when vegetation alone possessed the earth, and when there were no animals to devour or destroy it, we might expect to find it in its first and best estate, perhaps not comparable in variety and complexity of parts with the flora of the modern world, but grand in its luxuriance and majesty. Of such discoveries, however, we have no certain indication at present. 202 THE GENESIS AND MIGRATION OF PLANTS If such a primeval flora as that above indicated ever ex- isted, it must have perished utterly before the incoming of the next great age of the world — that known as the Palaeozoic, whose rocks are surpassingly rich in the remains of animals, especially those of the lower or invertebrate classes and those that inhabit the waters. In the oldest Palaeozoic rocks we find no plants certainly terrestrial, but abundance of Algae or seaweeds, and some gigantic members of the vegetable kingdom which seem to have been trees, with structures more akin to those of aquatic than to those of land plants.^ At a somewhat early stage, how- ever, in the rocks of this period, we discover a few undoubted land plants.^ These seem to be allied to the modern Club- mosses and to their humble relations, the pilhvorts -^ and other small plants of similar structure found in ponds and swamps. Some of them, indeed, appear to be intermediate between these groups. All these plants are Cryptogams, or destitute of true flowers, but do not belong to the lowest forms of that type. Thus, so far as we know, plant life on the land began possibly with certain large trees of algoid structures, and more certainly with the club mosses and pilhvorts and their allies, and these last in the form of species not tree-like in dimensions, but of very moderate size. The structures of these plants are already sufficiently well known to inform us that the plan and functions of the root, stem and leaf, and of spores and spore case were set up ; and that the structures and functions of vegetable cells, fibres and some kinds of vessels were perfected, and all the apparatus introduced necessary for the fertilization and reproduction of plants of some degree of complexity. At the same time, the peculiar structures of the higher Algae were brought to a pitch of perfection not surpassed * Nematopliyloii, etc. Sec " Gcolpt;ical History of Plants. "' - Psilophyton, rrotannularia, etc. ■* Rhizocarpeiv. THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF TLANTS 203 if equalled in modern times, and which may have enabled plants so constructed to exist even on the land. From these beginnings in the early Palaeozoic, the progress of the vegetable kingdom went on, until, in the later parts of that great period, the Devonian and Carboniferous eras, it culminated in those magnificent forests ^Yhich have left so many interesting remains, and which accumulated the materials of our great beds of coal. In these the famihes of the Club mosses, the Ferns and the Mare's-tails attained to a perfection in structure and size altogether unexampled in the modern world, and may be said to have overspread the earth almost to the exclusion of other trees. Here, however, two new families come in of higher grade, and leading the way to the flowering plants. These are the Pines and their allies and the Cycads, and certain intermediate forms, neither Pines nor Cycads, but allied to both.^ This wonderful flora, which we have now the materials to reproduce in imagination almost in its entirety, decays and passes away in the Permian system, the last portion of the Palaeozoic, and in entering into the third great period of the earth's history — the Mesozoic, we again find an almost entire change of vegetation. Here, however, we are able to understand something of the reasons of this. The Palceozoic floras seem to have originated in the North, and propagated themselves southward till they replenished the earth, and they were favoured by the existence at that time of vast swampy flats extending over great areas of the yet imperfectly elaborated continents. The Mesozoic floras, on the other hand, seem to have been of Southern or equatorial origin, and to have fol- lowed up the older vegetation as it decayed and disappeared, ' Cordaitis, etc. As I have elsewliere shown, these are distinct sub- floras in the Lower, Middle and Upper Devonian, and in the Lower, Middle and Upper Carboniferous and Permian, sufficiently different to allow these periods to be determined by the evidence of these fossil plants. Reports prepared for Geological Survey of Canada. 204 THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS or retreated in its old age to its northern home. There is, of course, much in all this that we do not understand, but the general fact seems certain. The early Mesozoic is altogether peculiar. It shows a vast predominance of Cycads, Pines and Ferns, to the exclusion both of the gigantic Cryptogams of the Palaeozoic and of the ordinary exogenous trees of the modern time. It has a strange, weird aspect, and more resembles that of some warm i.slands of the southern hemisphere at present, than anything else known to us. It is as if the flora of some southern island had migrated and invaded all parts of the world. The geographical and climated conditions which permitted this must have been of a character different from those both of earlier and later times. As we approach to the termination of the Mesozoic, which, in regard to animal life, is the age of reptiles, a new and strange development meets us. We find beds filled with leaves of broad-leaved plants similar to those of our modern woods, and in most cases apparently belonging to the same genera with plants now living, and this new type of vege- tation persists to the present, though with marked differences of species in successive eras, as in the Middle and Upper Cretaceous, and the Lower, Middle and Upper Kainozoic, or Tertiary. It is noteworthy that while this new vegetation not only altogether supersedes the great Cryptogamous forests of the Palaeozoic, but replaces the Cycads of the immediately preceding eras, the Pines retain all their prominence and grandeur, and even seem to excel in number of species, in breadth of dispersion, and in magnitude of growth their successors in the present world. While in the latter Cretaceous and Early Tertiary, the northern hemisphere at least seems to have enjoyed an ex- ceptionally warm climate, the later Tertiary introduces that period of cold known as the Glacial age. ^Vhile there is no doubt that the intensity of this glaciation lias been greatly THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS 205 exaggerated by extreme glacialists, and while it is certain that some vegetation, and this not altogether of Arctic types, con- tinued to exist throughout this period, even in the now tem- perate regions of our continents, it is evident that a great reduction of the exuberance of the flora occurred by the removal of many species, and that the present flora of the northern hemisphere is inferior in variety and magnificence to that of the Middle Tertiary, just as it is found that the Mammalian fauna of our continents has since that time been reduced both in the number and magnitude of its species. If the reader has followed this general sketch, he will be prepared to appreciate some examples of a more detailed character relating to the floras of different periods, and some discussions of general points relating to the genesis and vicis- situdes of the vegetable kingdom. The origination of the more important floras which have occupied the northern hemisphere in geological times, not, as one might at first sight suppose, in the sunny climates of the South, but under the arctic skies, is a fact long known or suspected. It is proved by the occurrence of fossil plants in Greenland, in Spitzbergen, and in Grinnell Land, under cir- cumstances which show that these were their primal homes. The fact bristles with physical difficulties, yet is fertile of the most interesting theoretical deductions, to reach which we may well be content to wade through some intricate questions. Though not at all a new fact, its full significance seems only re- cently to have dawned on the minds of geologists, and within recent years it has produced a number of memoirs and ad- dresses to learned societies, besides many less formal notices. 1 ' Sapoiata, " Aiicienne Vegetation Tolaire " ; Hooker, Presidential Address to Royal Society, 1878; Thistleton Dyer, "Lecture on Plant Distribution " ; Mr. Starkic Gardner, Letters in Nature, 1S78, etc. Tlie basis of most of the.>c brochures is to be found in I leer's " Flora Fossilis Arctica." 2o6 THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS The earliest suggestion on this subject known to the writer is that of my old and dear friend, Professor Asa Gray, in 1867, with reference to the probable northern source of the related floras of North America and FLastern Asia. With the aid of new facts disclosed by Heer and Lesquereux, Gray returned to the subject in 1872, and more fully developed this conclu- sion with reference to the Tertiary floras, '^ and still later he further discussed these questions in an able lecture on " Forest Geography and Archseology." ^ In this he puts the case so well and tersely that I may quote the following sentences as a text for what follows : — " I can only say, at large, that the same species (of Tertiary fossil plants) have been found all round the world ; that the richest and most extensive finds are in Greenland ; that they comprise most of the sorts w^hich I have spoken of, as Ameri- can trees which once lived in Europe— Magnolias, Sassafras, Hickories, Gum-trees, our identical Southern Cypress (for all we can see of difference), and especially Sequoias, not only the two which obviously answer to the two Big-trees now peculiar to California, but several others ; that they equally comprise trees now peculiar to Japan and China — three kinds of Gingko- trees, for instance, one of them not evidently distinguishable from the Japan species which alone survives : that we have evidence, not merely of Pines and Maples, Poplars, Birches, Lindens, and whatever else characterize the temperate-zone forests of our era, but also of particular species of these, so like those of our own time and country, that we may fairly reckon them as the ancestors of several of ours. Long genealogies always deal more or less in conjecture ; but we appear to be within the limits of scientific inference when we announce that our existing temperate trees came from the north, and within the bounds of high probability when we ' Address to American Associ.ition. * American Journal 0/ Science, y.\\, 1S7S. THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS 20/ claim not a few of them as the originals of present species. Remains of the same plants have been found fossil in our temperate region, as well as in Europe." Between i860 and 1870 the writer was engaged in working out all that could be learned of the Devonian plants of Eastern America, the oldest known flora of any richness, and which consists almost exclusively of gigantic, and to us grotesque, representatives of the Club mosses. Ferns, and Mares'-tails, with some trees allied to the Cycads and Pines. In this pursuit nearly all the more important localities were visited, and access was had to the large collections of Professor Hall and Professor Newberry in New York and Ohio, as well as to those of the Geological Survey of Canada, and to those made in the remarkable plant-bearing beds of St. John, New Brunswick, by Messrs. Matthew and Hartt. In the progress of these researches, which developed an unexpectedly rich assemblage of species, the northern origin of this old flora seemed to be established by its earlier culmination in the north-east, in connection with the growth of the American land to the southward, which took place after the great Upper Silurian subsidence, by elevations which began in the north, while those portions of the continent to the south-west still remained under the sea. When, in 1870, the labours of those ten years were brought before the Royal Society of London, in the Bakerian Lecture of that year, and in a memoir illustrating no less than one hundred and twenty-five species of plants older than the great Carboniferous system, these deductions were stated in con- nection with the conclusions of Hall, Logan, and Dana, as to the distributions of sediment along the north-east side of the American continent, and the anticipation was hazarded that the oldest Palaeozoic floras would be discovered to the north of Newfoundland. Mention was also made of the apparent earlier and more copious birth of the Devonian flora in s. E, ic 2oS THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS America than in Europe, a fact which is itself connected with the greater northward extension of this continent. Unfortunately the memoir containing these results was not published by the Royal Society, and its publication was secured in a less perfect form only in the reports of the Geo- logical Survey of Canada. The part of the memoir relating to Canadian fossil plants, with a portion of the theoretical de- ductions, was published in a report issued in 1871.^ In this report the following language was used : — " In Eastern America, from the Carboniferous period on- ward, the centre of plant distribution has been the Appalachian chain. From this the plants and sediments extended west- ward in times of elevation, and to this they receded in times of depression. But this centre was non-existent before the Devonian period, and the centre of this must have been to the north-east, whence the great mass of older Appalachian sedi- ment was derived. In the Carboniferous period there was also an eastward distribution from the Appalachians, and links of connection in the Atlantic bed between the floras of Europe and America. In the Devonian such connection can have been only far to the north-east. It is therefore in New- foundland, Labrador, and Greenland that we are to look for the oldest American flora, and in like manner on the border of the old Scandinavian nucleus for that of Europe."' "Again, it must have been the wide extension of the sea of the Corniferous limestone that gave the last blow to the re- maining flora of the Lower Devonian : and the re-elevation in the middle of that epoch brought in the Appalachian ridges as a new centre, and established a connection with Europe which introduced the Upper Devonian and Carboniferous floras. Lastly, from the comparative richness of the later Erian '' flora 1 " Fossil Plants of the Devonian and Upper .Silurian Formations of Canada," pp. 92, twenty plates. Montreal, 1S71. * The term Erian is used as synonymous with Devonian, and prob- THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS 209 in Eastern America, especially in the St. John beds, it might be a fair inference that the north-astern end of the Appala- chian ridge was the original birthplace or centre of creation of what we may call the later Palaeozoic flora, or a large part of that flora." When my paper was written I had not seen the account published by the able Swiss paloeobotanist Heer, of the re- markable Devonian flora of Bear Island, near Spitzbergen.^ From want of acquaintance with the older floras of America and Western Europe, Heer fell into the unfortunate error of regarding the Bear Island plants as Lower Carboniferous, a mistake which his great authority has tended to perpetuate, and which has even led to the still graver error of some Euro- pean geologists, who do not hesitate to regard as Carboni- ferous the fossil plants of the American deposits from the Hamilton to the Chemung groups inclusive, though these be- long to formations underlying the oldest Carboniferous, and characterized by animal remains of unquestioned Devonian age. In 1872 I addressed a note to the Geological Society of London on the subject of the so-called " Ursa stage " of Heer, showing that though it contained some forms not known at so early a date in temperate Europe, it was clearly Devonian when tested by North American standards ; but that in this high latitude, in which, for reasons stated in the report above re- ferred to, I believed the ]3evonian plants to have originated, there might be an intermixture of the two floras. But such a mixed group should in that latitude be referred to a lower horizon than if found in temperate regions. Between 1870 and 1873 my attention was turned to the two subfloras intermediate between those of the Devonian and the ably should be preferred to it, as poinling to the best development of this formation known, which is on the shores of Lake Erie. ' Trans. Swedish Academy, 187 1, Journal London Geological Sociely, vol. xxviii. 2IO THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS coal formation, the floras of the Lower Carboniferous (Sub- carboniferous of some American geologists) and the Millstone Grit, and in a report upon these ^ similar deductions were ex- pressed. It was stated that in Newfoundland and Northern Cape Breton the coal formation species come in at an early part of that period, and as we proceed southward they belong to progressively newer portions of the Carboniferous system. 'J'he same fact is observed in the coal beds of Scotland, as compared with those of England, and it indicates that the coal formation flora, like that of the Devonian, spread itself from the north, and this accords with the somewhat extensive occurrence of Lower Carboniferous rocks and fossils in the Parry Islands and elsewhere in the Arctic regions. ^ Passing over the comparatively poor flora of the earlier Mesozoic, consisting largely of cycads, pines, and ferns, which, as we have seen, is probably of southern origin, and is as yet little known in the arctic, though represented, according to Heer, by the supposed Jurassic flora of Cape Boheman, we find, especially at Kome' and Atane in Greenland, an interest- ing occurrence of those earliest precursors of the truly modern forms of plants which appear in the Cretaceous, the period of the English chalk, and of the New Jersey greensands. There are two plant groups of this age in Greenland, one, that of Kome consists almost entirely of ferns, cycad.s, and pines, and is of decidedly Mesozoic aspect. This was regarded by Heer as Lower Cretaceous. The other, that of Atane, holds remains of many modern temperate genera, as Fopuhis, JMyrica, Ficus, Sassafras, and AIai:;nolia. This he regards as IMiddle Creta- ceous. Above this is the Patoot series, with many exogenous trees of modern genera, and representing the Upper Creta- ceous. Resting u[)on these Upper Cretaceous beds, without * " Fossil Plants of Lower Carboniferous and Millstone Grit Formations of Canada," pp. 47, 10 plates. Montreal, 1S73. * G. M. Dawson, " Report on Arctic Regions of Canada." THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS 211 the intervention of any other formation/ are beds rich in plants of much more modern appearance, and referred by Heer to the Miocene period, a reference which appeared at the time to be warranted by comparison with the Tertiary plants of Europe, but, as we shall see, not with those of America. Still farther north this so-called Miocene assemblage of plants appears in Spitzbergen and Grinnell Land ; but there, owing to the predominance of trees allied to the spruces, it has a decidedly more boreal character than in Greenland, as might be anticipated from its nearer approach to the pole.^ If now we turn to the Cretaceous and Tertiary floras of Western America, as described by Lesquereux, Newberry, and Ward, we find in the lowest Cretaceous rocks known there until very recently — those of the Dakota group, which may be in the lower part of the Middle Cretaceous — a series of plants •'' essentially similar to those of the Middle Cretaceous of Greenland. To these I have been able to add, through the researches of Mr. Richardson and Dr. G. M. Dawson, a still earlier flora, that of the Kootanie and Queen Charlotte Island formations, as old as the Gault and Wealden. It wants the broad-leaved plants of the Dakota, and consists mainly of pines, cycads, and ferns ; and only in its upper part contains a few forerunners of the exogens.'* These plants occur in beds indicating shallow sea conditions as prevalent in the interior of America, causing, no doubt, a warm climate in the north. Overlying this plant-bearing formation we have an oceanic limestone (the Niobrara), corresponding in many respects to * Nordenskiold, Expedition to Greenland, Geological Alagazijit', 1872. ^ Yet even here the Bald Cypress {Taxodiitni distichiiin), or a tree nearly allied to it, is found, though this species is now limited to the Southern States. Fielden and Dc Y^-xwzq, Journal of Geological Society, 1878. ^ Lesquereux, Rejiort on Cretaceous Flora. The reader not interested in American details may pass over to the middle of page 213. ■* This flora has since been described in Virginia and Maryland by l'"()ntaine, and has been recognised in Montana by Newberry. 212 THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS the European chalk, and containing similar microscopic organ- isms. This extends far north into the British territory,^ indi- cating farther subsidence and the prevalence of a vast Mediter- ranean Sea, filled with warm water from the equatorial cur- rents, and not invaded by cold waters from the north. This is succeeded by Upper Cretaceous deposits of clay and sand- stone, with marine remains, though very sparsely distributed ; and these show that further subsidence or denudation in the north had opened a way for the arctic currents, producing a fall of temperature at the close of the Cretaceous, and partially filling up the Mediterranean of that period. Of the flora of the Middle and Upper Cretaceous periods, which must have been very long, we know something in the interior regions through the plants of Dunvegan and Peace River ; ^ and on the coast of British Columbia we have the remarkable Cretaceous coalfield of Vancouver's Island, which holds the remains of plants of modern genera, including species of fan palm, ginkgo, evergreen oak, tulip tree, and other forms proper to a warm temperature or subtropical climate. They probably indicate a warmer climate as then prevalent on the Pacific coast than in the interior, and in this respect corre- spond with a meagre transition flora, intermediate between the Cretaceous and Eocene or earliest Tertiary of the interior re- gions, and named by Lesquereux the Lower Lignitic. Immediately above these Upper Cretaceous beds we have the great Lignite Tertiary of the west — the T-aramie group or recent American reports ^ — abounding in fossil plants, proper to a temperate climate, at one time regarded as Miocene, but now known to be Lower Eocene.' These beds, with their ' G. M. Dawson, Report on Foily-niiUli Paiallcl. - Trans. Royal Society of Canada. ^ Ward, Repts. and Bulletins Am. Geol. Survey. * Lesquereux's Tertiary Flora ; White and Ward on the Laramie Group; Stevenson, Geological Relations of Lignitic Groups, Am. Phil. Soc. , Tune, 1875- THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS 213 characteristic plants, have been traced into the British territory north of the forty-ninth parallel, and it has been shown that their fossils are identical with those of the McKenzie River Valley, described by Heer as Miocene, and probably also with those of Alaska, referred to the same age.^ Now this truly Eocene flora of the temperate and northern parts of America has so many species in common with that called Miocene in Greenland, that its identity can scarcely be doubted. These facts have led me to doubt the Miocene age of the upper plant-bearing beds of Greenland, and more recently Mr. J. Starkie Gardner has shown from comparison with the Eocene flora of England and other considerations, that they are really of that earlier date.- In looking at these details, we might perhaps suppose that no conditions of climate could permit the vegetation of the neighbourhood of Disco in Greenland to be identical with that of Colorado and Missouri, at a time when little difference of level existed in the two regions. Either the southern flora migrated north in consequence of a greater amelioration of climate, or the northern flora moved southward as the climate became colder. The same argument, as Gardner has ably shown, applies to the similarity of the Tertiary plants of tem- perate Europe to those of Greenland. If Greenland required a temperature of about 50°, as Heer calculates, to maintain its " Miocene " flora, the temperature of England must have been at least 70°, and that of the south-western States still warmer. It is to be observed, however, that the geographical arrange- * G. M. Dawson, Report on the Geology of the Forty-ninth Parallel, 1875, where full details on these points may be found. 2 Nature, Dec. 12th, 1878 ; Publications Palreontographical Society ; Reports to British Association. It seems certain that the so-called Miocene of Rovey Tracey in Devon, and of Mull in Scotland, is really Eocene. The Tertiary plant-bearing beds of Greenland are said by Nathorst to rest un- cnnformably on the Cretaceous, and are characterized by JirClinlockia and other forms known in the Eocene of Great Britain and Ireland. 214 THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS merits of the American land in Cretaceous and early Eocene times, included the existence of a great inland sea of warm water extending at some periods as far north as the latitude of 55°, and that this must have tended to much equality of clima- tical conditions. We cannot certainly affirm anything respecting the origin and migrations of these floras, but there are some probabilities which deserve attention. The ferns and cycads of the so- called Lower Cretaceous of Greenland are nothing but a continuation of the previous Jurassic flora. Now this was established at an equally early date in the Queen Charlotte Islands,^ and still earlier in Virginia.- The presumption is, therefore, that it came from the south. It has indeed the facies of a southern hemisphere and insular flora, and pro- bably spread itself northward as far as Greenland at a time when the American land was long, narrow, and warm, and when the ocean currents were carrying tepid water far toward the arctic regions. The flora which succeeds this in the sec- tions at Atane and Patoot has no special affinities with the southern hemisphere, and is of a warm, temperate and conti- nental character. It is very similar in its general aspect to that of the Dakota group farther to the south, and this is probably Middle Cretaceous. This flora must have originated either somewhere in temperate America, or within the arctic circle, and it must have replaced the older one by virtue of increasing subsidence and gradual change of climate. It must therefore have been connected with the depression of the land which took place in the course of the Cretaceous. During this movement it spread over all Western America, and as the land again arose from the sea of the Niobrara chalk, it assumed an aspect more suited to a cool climate, or moved southward, ' Reports Geological .Survey of Canad.i. - Fontaine has well describeil the Mcsozoic flora of Virginia, Aincrican journal of Science^ January, 1S79. THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS 21 5 and finally abandoned the Arctic regions, perhaps continuing to exist on the Pacific coast, and in sheltered places in the north, till the warm inland seas of the Upper Cretaceous had given place to the wide plains and landlocked brackish seas or fresh-water lakes of the Laramie period (Eocene). Thus the true Upper Cretaceous marks in the interior a cooler period intervening between the Middle Cretaceous and the Lower Eocene floras of Greenland. This latter established itself in Greenland, and probably all around the Arctic circle, in the mild period of the earliest Eocene, and as the climate of the northern hemisphere became gradually reduced from that time till the end of the Pliocene, it marched on over both continents to the southward, chased behind by the modern arctic flora, and eventually by the frost and snow of the Glacial age. This history may admit of cor- rection in details ; but, so far as present knowledge extends, it is in the main not far from the truth. Perhaps the first great question which it raises is that as to the causes of the alternations of warm and cold climates in the north, apparently demanded by the vicissitudes of the vegetable kingdom. Here we may set aside the idea that in former times plants were suited to endure greater cold than at present. It is true that some of the fossil Greenland plants are of un- known genera, and many are new species to us ; but we are on the whole safe in affirming that they must have required conditions similar to those necessary to their modern repre- sentatives, except within such limits as we now find to hold in similar cases among existing plants. Still we know that at the present time many species found in the equable climate of England will not live in Canada, though species to all ajipear- ance similar in structure are natives of the latter. There is also some reason to suppose that species, when new, may have greater hardiness and adaptability than when in old age, and verging toward extinction. In any case, these facts can account 2l6 THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS for but a small part of the phenomena, which require to be ex- plained by physical changes affecting the earth as a whole, or at least the northern hemisphere. Many theoretical views have been suggested on this subject, which will be found dis- cussed elsewhere, and perhaps the most practical way to deal with them here will be to refer to the actual conditions known to have prevailed in connection with the introduction and distribution of the principal floras which have succeeded each other in geological history. If we can assume that all the carbon now sealed up in lime- stones and in coal was originally floating in the atmosphere as carbon dioxide, then we would have a cause which might seriously have affected the earlier land floras — that, for instance, which may have existed in the Eozoic age, and those well known to us in the Palaeozoic. Such an excess of carbonic acid would have required some difference of constitution in the plants themselves ; it would have afforded them a super- abundance of wood-forming nutriment, and it would have acted as an obstacle to the radiation of heat from the earth, almost equal to the glass roof of a greenhouse, thus constituting a great corrective of changes of temperature. Under such cir- cumstances we might expect a peculiar and exuberant vegeta- tion in the earlier geological ages, though this would not apply to the later in any appreciable degree. In addition to this we know that the geographical arrangements of our continents were suited to the production of a great uniformity of climate. Taking the American continent as the simpler, we know that in this period there existed in the interior plateau between the rudimentary eastern and western mountains a great inland sea, so sheltered from the north that its waters contained hun- dreds of species of corals, growing with a luxuriance unsur- passed in the modern tropics. On the shores and islands of such a sea we do not wonder that there should have been tree ferns and gigantic lycopods. In the succeeding Carboniferous, THE GKNESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS 21/ vast areas, both on the margins and in the interior of the continent, were occupied with swampy flats and lagoons, the atmosphere of which must have been loaded with vapour, and rich in compounds of carbon, though the temperature may have been lower than in the Devonian. There still remained, however, more especially in the west, a remnant of the old inland sea, which must have greatly aided in carrying a warm temperature to the north. If now we pass to the succeeding Jurassic age, we find a more meagre and less widely distributed flora, corresponding to less favourable geographical and climatal conditions, while in the Cretaceous and Eocene ages a return to the old con- dition of a warm Mediterranean in continuation of the Gulf of Mexico gave those facilities for vegetable growth, which carried plants of the temperate zone as far north as Greenland. It thus appears that those changes of physical geography and of the ocean currents to which reference is so often made in these papers, apply to the question of the distribution or plants in geological time. These same causes may help us to deal with the peculiarities of the great Glacial age, which may have been rendered ex- ceptionally severe by the combination of several of the conti- nental and oceanic causes of refrigeration. We must not imagine, however, that the views of those extreme glacialists, who suppose continental ice caps reaching half way to the equator, are borne out by facts. In truth, the ice accumulat- ing round the pole must have been surrounded by water, and there must have been tree-clad islands in the midst of the icy seas, even in the time of greatest refrigeration. This is proved by the fact that in the lower Leda clay of Eastern Canada, which belongs to the time of greatest submergence, and whose fossil shells show sea water almost at the freezing point, there are leaves of poplars and other plants which must have been drifted from neighbouring shores. Similar remains occur in 2l8 THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS clays of similar origin in the basin of the great lakes and in the West, and are not Arctic plants, but members of the North Temperate flora.^ These have been called " interglacial," but there is no evidence to prove that they are not truly glacial. Thus, while the arctic flora must have continued to exist within the Arctic circle in the Glacial age, we have evidence that those of the cold temperate and subarctic zones continued to exist pretty far north. At the same time the warm temperate flora would be driven to the south, except where sustained in insular spots warmed by the equatorial currents. It would return north- ward on the re-elevation of the land and the return of warmth. If, however, our modern flora is thus one that has returned from the south, this would account for its poverty in species as compared with those of the early Tertiary. Groups of plants descending from the north have been rich and varied. Re- turning from the south they are like the shattered remains of a beaten army. This, at least, has been the case with such re- treating floras as those of the Lower Carboniferous, the Per- mian, and the Jurassic, and possibly that of the Lower Eocene of Europe. The question of the supply of light to an Arctic flora is much less difficult than some have imagined. The long summer day is in this respect a good substitute for a longer season of growth, while a copious covering of winter snow not only protects evergreen plants from those sudden alternations of temperature which are more destructive than intense frost, and prevents the frost from penetrating to their roots, but by the ammonia which it absorbs preserves their greenness. According to Dr. Brown, the Danish ladies of Disco long ago solved this problem.'' He informs us that they cultivate in ' Pleistocene Plants of Cannda, Dawson and Penhallow, Bull. Gcol. Soij., America, 1S90. In Europe the Arctic flora extended, relatively to present climate, farther south. * /''Ion/la Discoaiia, Botanical Society of Edinburgh, 1S6S. THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS 219 their houses most of our garden flowers, as roses, fuchsias, and geraniums, showing that it is merely warmth, and not light that is required to enable a subtropical flora to thrive in Green- land. Even in Canada, which has a flora richer in some re- spects than that of temperate Europe, growth is effectually arrested by cold for nearly six months, and though there is ample sunlight there is no vegetation. It is indeed not im- possible that in the plans of the Creator the continuous summer sun of the Arctic regions may have been made the means for the introduction, or at least for the rapid growth and multiplication, of new and more varied types of plants. It is a matter of familiar observation in Canada that our hardy garden flowers attain to a greater luxuriance and intensity of colour in those more northern latitudes where they have the advan- tage of long and sunny summer days. Much, of course, remains to be known of the history of the old floras whose fortunes I have endeavoured to sketch, and which seem to have been driven like shuttlecocks from north to south, and from south to north, especially on the American continent, whose meridional extension seems to have given a field specially suited for such operations. This great stretch of the western continent from north to south is also connected with the interesting fact that, when new floras are entering from the Arctic regions, they appear earlier in America than in Europe ; and that in times when the old floras are retreating from the south, old genera and species linger longer in America. Thus, in the Devonian and Cre- taceous new forms of those periods appear in America long before they are recognised in Europe, and in the modern epoch forms that would be regarded in Europe as Miocene still exist. Much confusion in reasoning as to the geological ages of the fossil flora has arisen from want of attention to this circumstance. What we have learned respecting this wonderful history has 220 THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS served strangely to change some of our preconceived ideas. We must now be prepared to admit that an Eden might exist even in Spitzbergen, that there are possibihties in this old earth of ours which its present condition does not reveal to us ; that the present state of the world is by no means the best possible in relation to climate and vegetation ; that there have been and might be again conditions which could con- vert the ice-clad Arctic regions into blooming paradises, and which, at the same time, would moderate the fervent heat of the tropics. We are accustomed to say that nothing is impossible with God ; but how little have we known of the gigantic pos- sibilities which lie hidden under some of the most common of His natural laws. Yet these facts have been made the occasion of speculations as to the spontaneous development of plants without any direct creative intervention. It would, from this point of view, be a nice question to calculate how many revolutions of climate would suffice to evolve the first land plant ; what are the chances that such plant would be so dealt with by physical changes as to be preserved and nursed into a meagre flora like that of the Upper Silurian or the Jurassic ; how many trans- jjortations to (ireenland would suffice to promote such meagre flora into the rich and abundant forests of the Upper Creta- ceous, and to people the earth with the exuberant vegetation of the early Tertiary. Such problems we may never be able to solve. Probably they admit of no solution, unless we invoke the action of a creative mind, operating through long ages, and correlating with boundless power and wisdom all the energies inherent in inorganic and organic nature. Even then we shall perhaps be able to comprehend only the means by which, after specific types have been created, they may, by the culture of their Maker, be " sported " into new varieties or sub-species, and thus fitted to exist under different conditions, or to occupy higher places in the economy of nature. THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS 221 Before venturing on such extreme speculations as some now current on questions of this kind, we would require to know the successive extinct floras as perfectly as those of the modern world, and to be able to ascertain to what extent each species can change, either spontaneously or under the influence of struggle for existence, or expansion under favourable conditions, and under Arctic semi-annual days and nights, or the shorter days of the tropics. Such knowledge, if ever acquired, it may take ages of investigation to accumulate. In any case the sub- ject of this paper indicates one hopeful line of study with the object of arriving at some comprehension of the laws of creation. While the facts above slightly sketched impress us with the grand progress of the vegetable kingdom in geological time, they equally show the persistence of vegetable forms as com- pared with that of the dead continental masses and the decay of some forms of life in favour of the introduction of others. AVhen we find in the glacial beds the leaves of trees still living in North America and Europe, and consider the vicissi- tudes of elevation and submergence of the land, and of Arctic and temperate climates which have occurred, we are struck with the persistence of the weak things of life, as com- pared with the changeableness of rocks and mountains. A superficial observer might think the fern or the moss of a granite hill a frail and temporary thing as compared with solid and apparently everlasting rock. But just the reverse is the ca.se. The plant is usually older than the mountain. But the glacial age is a very recent thing. We have facts older than this. As hinted in a previous paper, in the Laramie clays associated with the Lignite beds of North-western Canada — beds of Lower Eocene or early Tertiary age — which were de- posited before the Rocky Mountains or the Himalayas had reared their great peaks and ridges, and at a time when the whole geography of the northern hemisphere was different 222 THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS from what it is at present — are remains of very frail and deli- cate plants which still live. I have shown that in these clays there exist, side by side, the Sensitive Fern, Onoclea scnsibi/is, and one of the delicate rock ferns, Davallia tenuifolia} The first is still very abundant all over North America. The second has ceased to exist in North America, but still survives in the valleys of the Himalayas. These two little plants, once prob- ably very widely diffused over the northern hemisphere, have continued to exist through the millenniums separating the Cretaceous from the present time, and in which the greater part of our continent was again and again under the sea, in which great mountain chains have been rolled up and sculptured into their present forms, and in which giant forms, both ot animal and plant life, have begun, culminated and passed away. Truly God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound those that are strong. Other plants equally illustrate the decadence of important types of vegetable life. In the beautiful family of the Magnolias there exists in America a most remarkable and elegant tree, whose trunk attains sometimes a diameter of 7 feet and a height of 80 or 90 feet. Its broad deep green leaves are singularly truncate at the end, as if artificially cut off, and in spring it puts forth a wealth of large and brilliant orange and yellow fiowers, from which it obtains the name of Tulip tree. It is the Liriodendron tullpifera of botanists, and the sole species of its genus. This Tulip tree has a history. All through the Tertiary beds we find leaves referable to the genus, and belonging not to one species only, but to several, and as we go back into the Cretaceous, the species seem to become more numerous. Many of them have smaller leaves than the modern species, others larger, and some have forms even more quaint than that of the existing Tulij) tree. The oldest that I have seen in Canada is one from the Upper Cretaceous of * Report on 49th Parallel, 1875. THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS 223 Port McNeil in the north of Vancouver Island, which is as large as that of the modern species, and very similar in form. Thus this beautiful vegetable type culminated long geological ages ago, and was represented by many species, no doubt occu- pying a prominent place in the forests of the northern hemi- sphere. To-day only a single species exists, in our warmer re- gions, to keep up the memory of this almost perished genus ; but that species is one of our most beautiful trees. The history of the Sequoias or giant Cypresses, of which two species now exist in limited areas in California, is still more striking. These giant trees, monsters of the vegetable king- dom, are, strange to say, very limited in their geographical range. The greater of the two. Sequoia gigantea, the giant tree par excelknce, seems limited to a few groves in California. At first sight this strikes us as anomalous, especially as we find that the tree will grow somewhat widely both in Europe and America when its seeds are sown in suitable soil. The mystery is solved when we learn that the two existing species are but survivors of a genus once diffused over the whole northern hemisphere, and represented by many species, constituting, in the Later Cretaceous and Eocene ages, vast and dark forests extending over enormous areas of our continents, and forming much of the material of the thick and widely distributed Lignite beds of North-western America. Thus the genus has had its time of expansion and prevalence, and is now prob- ably verging on extinction, not because there are not suitable habitats, but either because it is now old and moribund, or because other and newer forms have now a preference in the existing conditions of existence. The Plane trees, the Sassafras, the curious Ginkgo tree or fern-leaved yew of Japan, are cases of similar decadence of genera once represented by many species, while other trees, like the Willows and Poplars, the Maples, the Birches, the Oaks and the Pines, though of old date, are still as abundant as S. E, 16 224 THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS they ever were, and some genera would seem even to have increased in number of species, though on the whole the flora of our modern woods is much less rich than those of the Miocene and Eocene, or even than that of the Later Cre- taceous. The early Tertiary periods were, as we know, times of exuberant and gigantic animal life on the land, and it is in con- nection with this that the vegetable world seems to have attained its greatest variety and luxuriance. Even that early post-glacial age in which primitive man seems first to have spread himself over our continents was one richer both in animal and plant life than the present. The geographical changes which closed this period and inaugurated the modern era seem to have reduced not only the area of the continents but the variety of land life in a very remarkable manner. Thus our last lesson from the genesis and migrations of plants is the humbling one that the present world is by no means the best possible in so far as richness of vegetable and animal life is concerned. Reference has been made to the utility of fossil plants as evidence of climate ; but the subject deserves more detailed notice. I have often pondered on the nature of the climate evidenced by the floras of the Devonian and Carboniferous; but the problem is a difficult one, not only because of the peculiar character of the plants themselves, so unlike those of our time, but because of the probably different meteorological conditions of the period. It is easy to see that a flora of tree-ferns, great lycopods and pines is more akin to that of oceanic islands in warm latitudes than anything else that we know. But the Devonian and Carboniferous })lants did not flourish in oceanic islands, but for the most part on continental areas of consider- able dimensions, though probably more flat and less elevated than those of the present day. They also grew, from Arctic latitudes, almost, if not altogether, to the equator ; and though there are generic differences in the plants of these periods in THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS 225 the southern hemisphere, yet these do not affect the general facies. There are, for example, characteristic Lepidodendroids in the Devonian and Carboniferous of Brazil, Australia, and South Africa. If now we consider the plants a little more in detail, coniferous and taxine trees grow now in very different latitudes and climates. There is therefore nothing so very remarkable in their occurrence. The great group of Cordaites may have been equally hardy ; but it is noteworthy that their geographical distribution is more limited. In Europe, for example, they are more characteristic in France than in Great Britain. Ferns and Lycopods and Mares'-tails are also cosmo- politan, but the larger species belong to the warmer climates, and nowhere at present do they become so woody and so com- plex in structure as they were in the older geological periods. At the present day, however, they love moisture rather than aridity, and uniformity of temperature rather than extreme light and heat. The natural inference would be that in these older periods geographical and other conditions must have conspired to produce a uniform and moist climate over a large portion of the continents. The geographical conditions of the Carboniferous age, and the distribution of animal life on the sea and land, confirm the conclusion based on the flora. Further, if, as seems probable, there was a larger proportion of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere than at present, this would not only directly affect the growth of plants, but would im- pede radiation, and so prevent escape of heat by that means, while the moisture exhaled from inland seas and lagoons and vastly extended swamps, would tend in the same direction. It would, however, be a mistake to infer that there were not local differences of climate. I have elsewhere^ advocated the theory that the great ridge of boulders, the New Glasgow con- glomerate, which forms one margin of the coal field of Picton, * " Acadian Geology,'" Caiboniferous ol Picton. 226 THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS in Nova Scotia, is an ice-formed ridge separating the area of accumulation of the great thirty-six feet seam from an outer area in which aqueous conditions prevailed, and little coal was formed. In this case, an ice-laden sea, carrying boulders on its floes and fields of ice, must have been a few miles distant from forests of Lepidodendra, Cordaites, and Sigillarice, and the climate must have been anything but warm, at least at certain seasons. Nor have we a right to infer that the growth of the coal-plants was rapid. Stems, with woody axes and a thick bark, containing much fibrous and thick-walled cellular tissue, are not to be compared v/ith modern succulent plants, es- pecially when we consider the sparse and rigid foliage of many of them. Our conclusion should, therefore, be that geographi- cal conditions and the abundance of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere favoured a moist climate and uniform temperature, and that the flora was suited to these conditions. As to the early Mesozoic flora, I have already suggested that it must have been an invader from the south, for which the intervening Permian age had made way by destroying the Palaeozoic flora. This was probably effected by great earth- movements changing geographical conditions. But in the Mesozoic the old conditions to some extent returned, and the Carboniferous plants being extinct, their places were taken by pines, lycopods, and ferns, whose previous home had been in the insular regions of the tropics, and which, as climatal conditions improved, pushed their way to the Arctic circle. But, being derivatives of warm regions, their vitality and capacity for variation were not great, and they only locally and in favourable conditions became great coal producers. The new flora of the Later Cretaceous and the Tertiary, as previously stated, origi- nated in the Arctic, and marched southward. These newer Cretaceous plants presented from the first the generic aspects of modern vegetation, and so enable us much better to gauge their climatal conditions. In general, they do THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS 22/ not indicate tropical heat in the far north, but only that of the warm temperate zone ; but this in some portions of the period certainly extends to the middle of Greenland, unless, without any evidence, we suppose that the Cretaceous and lower Tertiary plants differed in hardiness of constitution from their modern representatives. They prove, however, considerable oscillations of climate. Gardner, Nathorst and Reid have shown this in Europe, and that it extends from the almost tropical flora of the lower Eocene to the Arctic flora of the Pleistocene. In America, owing, as Grey has suggested, to its great north and south extension, the changes were more regular and gradual. In the warmer periods of the Cretaceous, the flora as far north as 55° was similar to that of Georgia and Northern Florida at the present day, while in the cooler period of the Laramie (Lower Eocene, or more probably Paleocene) it was not un- like that of the Middle States. In the Pleistocene, the flora indicates a boreal temperature in the Glacial age. Thus there are no very extreme contrasts, but the evident fact of a warm temperate or sub-tropical climate extending very far north at the same times when Greenland had a temperate climate. As I have elsewhere shown, ^ discoveries in various parts of North America are beginning to indicate the precise geographical conditions accompanying the warmer and colder climates. It would be wrong to leave this subject without noticing that remarkable feature in the southward movement of the later floras, to which I believe Prof Gray was the first to direct attention. In those periods when a warm cliniate pre- vailed in the Arctic regions, the temperate flora must have been, like the modern Arctic flora, circumpolar. When obliged to migrate to the south, it had to follow the lines of the con- tinents, and so to divide into separate bands. Three of these at present are the floras of ^^'estern Europe, Eastern Asia, and Eastern America, all of which have many re[)resentative ' Trans. Royal Society of Canaila, 1S90-1. 228 THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS species. They are separated by oceans and by belts of land occupied by plants which have not been obliged to migrate. Thus, while the flora of the Eastern United States resembles that of China and Japan, that of California and Oregon is distinct from both, and represents a belt of old species retained in place by the continued warmth of the Pacific shore, and the continuous extension of the American continent to the south affording them means of retreat in the Glacial age. Were the plants of China and Eastern America enabled to return to the Arctic, they would then reunite into one flora. Gray compares the process of their separation to the kind of selection which might be made by a botanical distributor who had the whole collection placed in his hands, with instructions to give one species of each genus to Europe, to Eastern Asia, and to Eastern America ; and if there was only one species in a genus, or if one remained over, this was to be thrown into one of the regions, with a certain preference in favour of America and Asia. This remarkable kind of geographical selection opens a wide field not only for thought, but for experiment on the actual relationship of the representative species. There is a similar field for comparison between the trees of Georgia in latitude 30° to 35°, and the same species or their representa- tives as they existed in Cretaceous times in the latitudes of 50° and 60°. The two floras, as I know from actual com- parison, are very similar. One word may be said here as to use of fossil [ilants in determining geological time. In this 1 need only point to the fact of my having defined in Canada three Devonian floras, a Lower, Middle, and Upper, and that Mr. Whiteaves, in his independent study of the fossil fishes, has vindicated my conclusions. There arc also in Nova Scotia three distinctive sub-floras of the Tower, Middle, and Upper Carboniferous.' I ' Transactions Royal Society of Canada, 1SS3 to 1S91. THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS 229 have verified these for the Devonian and Carboniferous of the United States, and to some extent also for those of Europe. To the same effect is the recognition of the Kootanie or Lower Cretaceous, the Middle Cretaceous, Upper Cretaceous, Laramie and Miocene in Western Canada. These have in all cases corresponded with the indications of animal fossils ^ and of stratigraphy. Fossil plants have been less studied in this connection than fossil animals, but I have no hesitation in affirming that, with reference to the broader changes of the earth's surface, any competent paleeobotanist is perfectly safe in trusting to the evidence of vegetable fossils. It may be objected that such evidence will be affected by the migrations of plants, so that we cannot be certain that identical jpecies flourished in Greenland and in temperate America at the same time. If such species originated in Greenland and migrated southward, the specimens found at the south may be much newer than those in the north. This, no doubt, is locally true, but the migrations of plants, though slow, occupy less time than that of a great geological period. It may also be objected that the flora of swamps, plains, and mountain tops would differ at any one period. This also is true, but the same difiiculty applies to animals of the deep sea, the shore, and the land ; and these diversities of station have always to be taken into account by the paleontologist. References : — Report on the Eiian or Devonian Plants of Canada, Montreal, 1871. Article in Princeton Keview on Genesis and Migrations of Plants. " The Geological History of Plants," London and New York, 188S and 1892. Papers on Fossil Plants of Western Canada, 1883, and following volumes of Transactions of Royal Society of Canada. Note. — Since writing the above, I have obtained access to Dal! and Harris' " Neocene Correlation Papers," which throw some additional ' Reports on Fossil Plants of the Devonian and Lower Carboniferous. 230 THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS light on the Cretaceous and Eocene Floras of Alaska, which, from its high northern latitude, affords a good parallel to Greenland. It would appear that plant beds occur in that territory at two horizons. One of these (Cape Beaufort), according to Lesquereux and Ward, holds species ot Neocomian Age, and apparently equivalent to the Kootanie of British Columbia and the Kome of Greenland. The other, which occurs at several localities (Elukak, Port Graham, etc.), has a flora evidently of Laramie (Eocene) age, equivalent to the "Miocene" of Heer and Les- quereux, and to the Lignite Tertiary of Canada. The plants are accom- panied by lignite, and evidently in siiii, and clearly prove harmony with Greenland and British Cohimbia in two of the periods of high Arctic temperature indicated above. THE GROWTH OF COAL. DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF DR. SCHIMPER, OF STRASBURG, The Author of "La Flore du Monde Primitif," and many other contributions to fo.ssil botanv, AND OF DR. H. R. GOEPPERT, WHOSE Essay on the Structure and Formation of Coal WAS One of my first Guides in its Study. Questions of Growth and Driftage — Testimony of a Block of Coal under the Microscope — Different Kinds of Coal — Conditions Necessary to Accumu- lation IN situ — Coal Beds and their Accompani- ments— Underclays and Roofs — Vegetable Remains — History of Coal Groups— Summary of Evidence — Subsidence of Coal Areas— Stigmaria and other Coal Plants — Later Coal Accumulations — The Story and Uses of Coal Part of a Com. Group, at the South Joggins, wiili uikI-ji clays am erect trees and Calamites (p. 238). CHAPTER IX. THE GROWTH OF COAL. MY early boyhood was spent on the Coal formation rocks and in the vicinity of collieries ; and among my first natural history collections, in a childish museum of many kinds of objects, were some impressions of fern leaves from the shales of the coal series. It came to pass in this way that the Carboniferous rocks were those which I first studied as an embryo geologist, and much of my later work has consisted in collecting and determining the plants of that ancient period, and in studying microscopic sections of coals and fossil woods ac- companying them. For this reason, and because I have pub:- lished so much on this subject, my first decision was to leave it out of these Salient Points: but on second thoughts it seemed that this might be regarded as a dereliction of duty ; more especially as some of the conclusions supposed to be the best established on this subject have recently been called in question. Had I been writing a few years ago, I might have referred to the mode of formation of coal as one of the things most surely settled and understood. The labours of many eminent geolo- gists, microscopists and chemists in the old and the new worlds had shown that coal nearly always rests upon old soil-surfaces penetrated with roots, and that coal beds have in their roofs erect trees, the remains of the last forests that grew upon them. Logan and the writer have illustrated this in the case of the series of more than eighty successive coal beds exposed at the 234 THE GROWTH OF COAL South Joggins, and of the great thirty feet seam of the Picton coal series, whose innumerable laminre have all been subjected to careful scrutiny, and have shown unequivocal evidence of land surfaces accompanying the deposition of the coal. Micro- scopical examination has proved that these coals are composed of the materials of the same trees whose roots are found in the underclays, and their stems and leaves in the roof shales ; that much of the material of the coal has been partially subjected to subaerial decay at the time of its accumulation ; and that in this, ordinary coal differs from bituminous shale, earthy bit- umen and some kinds of cannel, which have been formed under water ; that the matter remaining as coal consists almost entirely of epidermal tissues, which being suberose or corky in char- acter are highly carbonaceous, very durable and impermeable by water, and are, hence, the best fitted for the production of pure coal ; and finally, that the vegetation and the climatal and geographical features of the coal period were eminently fitted to produce in the vast swamps of that period precisely the effects observed. All these points and many others have been thoroughly worked out for both European and American coal fields, and seemed to leave no doubt on the subject. But several years ago certain microscopists observed in slices of coal, thin layers full of spore cases, a not unusual circumstance, since these were shed in vast abundance by the trees of the coal forests, and because they contain suberose matter of the same character with epidermal tissues generally. Immediately we were informed that all coal consists of spores, and this being at once accepted by the unthinking, the results of the labours of many years are thrown aside in favour of this crude and partial theory. A little later, a German microscopist has thought proper to describe coal as made up of minute algne, and tries to reconcile this view with the appearances, devising at the same time a new and formidable nomenclature of generic and specific names, which would seem largely to represent mere THE GROWTH OF COAL 235 fragments of tissues. Still later, some local facts in a French coal field have induced an eminent observer of that country to revive the drift theory of coal, in opposition to that of growth in situ. Views of this kind have also recendy been advanced in England by some of those younger men who would earn dis- tinction rather by overthrowing the work of their seniors than by building on it. These writers base their conclusions on a few exceptional facts, as the occasional occurrence of seams of coal without distinct underlays, and the occurrence of clay partings showing aquatic conditions in the substance of thick coals ; and they fail to discern the broader facts which these ex- ceptions confirm. Let us consider shordy the essential nature of coal, and some of the conditions necessary to its forma- tion. A block of the useful mineral which is so important an element in national wealth, and so essential to the comfort of our winter homes, may tell us much as to its history if properly interro- gated, and what we cannot learn from it alone we may be taught by studying it in the mine whence it is obtained, and in the cliffs and cuttings where the edges of the coaly beds and their accompaniments are exposed. Our block of coal, if anthracite, is almost pure carbon. It bituminous coal, it contains also a certain amount of hydrogen, which in combination with carbon enables it to yield gas and coal tar, and which causes it to burn with flame. If, again, we examine some of the more imperfect and more recent coals, the brown coals, so called, we shall find that in composition and texture they are intermediate between coal proper and hardened or compressed peat. Now such coaly rocks can, under the present constitution of nature, be produced only in one way, namely, by the accumulation of vegetable matter, for vegetation alone has the power of decomposing the carbonic acid of the atmosphere, and accumulating it as carbon. This we see in modern times in the vegetable soil, in peaty beds, and in 236 THE GROWTH OF COAL vegetable muck accumulated in ponds and similar places. Such vegetable matter, once accumulated, requires only pressure and the changes which come of its own slow putrefaction to be converted into coal. But in order that it may accumulate at all, certain conditions are necessary. The first of these includes the climatal and or- ganic arrangements necessary for abundant vegetable growth. The second is the facility for the preservation of the vegetable matter, without decay or intermixture with earthy substances ; and this, for a long time, till a great thickness of it accumulates. The third is its covering up by other deposits, so as to be com- pressed and excluded from air. It is evident that when we have to consider the formation of a bed of coal several feet in thick- ness, and spread, perhaps, over hundreds of square miles, many things must conduce to such a result, and the wonder is perhaps rather that such conditions should ever have been effectively combined. Yet this has occurred at difierent periods of geo- logical history and in many places, and in some localities it has been so repeated as to produce many beds of coal in succes- sion. Let us now question our block of coal as to its origin, sup- posing it to be a piece of ordinary bituminous coal, or still better, a specimen of one of the impure somewhat shaly coals which one sometimes finds accidentally in the coal bin. In look- ing at the edge of our specimen we observe that it has a " reed " or grain, which corresponds with the lamination or bedding of the seam of coal from which it came. Looking at this carefully, we shall see that there are many thin layers of bright shining coal, and the more of these usually the better the coal. These layers, in tracing them along, we observe often to thin out and disappear. They are not very continuous. If our specimen is an impure coal, we will find that it readily splits along the sur- faces of these layers, and that when so split, we can see that each layer of shining coal has certain markings, perhaps the flattened THE GROWTH OF COAL 237 ribs and scars of Sigillaria or other coal-formation trees on its surface. In other words, the layers of fine coal are usually flattened trunks and branches of trees, or perhaps rather of the imperishable and impermeable bark of such trees, the wood having perished. A few very thin layers of shining coal we may also find to consist of the large-ribbed leaves of the plant known as Cordaites. This kind of coaly matter then usually represents trunks of trees which in a prostrate and flattened state may constitute more than half of the bulk of ordinary coal-formation coal. Under the microscope this variety of coal shows little structure, and this usually the thickened cells of cortical tissue. Intervening between these layers we perceive lamina, more or less thick and continuous, of what we may call dull coal, black but not shining ; resembling, in fact, the appearance of cannel coal. If we split the coal along one side of these layers, and examine it in a strong light, we may see shreds of leaf stalks and occasionally even of fern leaves, or skeletons of these, show- ing the veins, and many flattened disc-like bodies, spore cases and macrospores, shed by the plants which make up the coal. These layers represent what may be called compressed vegetable mould or muck, and this is by no means a small constituent of many coals. This portion of the coal is the most curious and interesting in microscopic slices, showing a great variety of tissues and many spores and spore cases. Lastly, we find on the surface of the coal, when split parallel to the bedding, a quantity of soft shining fibrous material, known as mineral charcoal or mother coal, which in some varieties of the mineral is very abundant, in others much more rare. This is usually too soft and incoherent to be polished in thin slices for the microscope ; but if boiled for a length of time in nitric acid, so as to separate all the mineral matter contained in it, the fibres sometimes become beautifully translucent and reveal the tissues of the wood of various kinds of Carboniferous trees, more especially of Calamites, Cordaites and Sigillaria;. Fibres s. E. 17 TflE GROWTH OF COAL of mineral charcoal prepared in this way are often very beauti- ful microscopic objects under high powers ; and this material of the coal is nothing else than little blocks of rotten wood and fibrous bark, broken up and scattered over the surface of the forming coal bed. All these materials, it must be observed, have been so compressed that the fragments of decayed wood have been flattened into films, the vegetable mould consolidated into a stony mass, and trunks of great trees converted by enormous pressure into laminae of shining coal, a tenth of an inch in thick- ness, so that the whole material has been reduced to perhaps one-hundredth of its original volume. Restoring the mass in imagination to its original state, what do we find ? A congeries of prostate trunks with their interstices filled with vegetable muck or mould, and occasional surfaces where rotten wood, disintegrated into fragments, was washed about in local floods or rain storms, and thus thrown over the surface. Lyell seems very nearly to have hit the mark when he regarded the conditions of the great dismal swamp of Virginia as representing those of a nascent coal field. We have only to realize in the coal period the existence of a dense vegetation very different from that of modern Virginia, of a humid and mild climate, and of a vast extension of low swampy plains, to restore the exact conditions of the coal swamps. But how does this correspond with the facts observed in mines and sections ? To the late Sir William Logan is due the merit of observing that in South \^■ales the underclays or beds of indurated clay and earth underlying the coal seams are usually filled with the long cyUndrical rootlets and branching roots of a curious plant, very common in the coal formation, the Stigmaria. He afterwards showed that the same fact occurs in the very numerous coal beds exposed in the fine section cut by the tides of the Bay of Fundy, in the coal rocks of Nova Scotia. In that district I have myself followed up THE GROWTH OF COAL 239 his observations, examining in detail every one of eighty-one Coal Groups, as I have called them, each consisting of at least one bed of coal, large or small, with its accompaniments, and in many cases of several small seams with intervening clays or shales. ^ In nearly every case the Stigmaria "under- clay " is distinctly recognisable, and often in a single coal group there are several small seams separated by underclays with roots and rootlets. These underclays are veritable fossil soils ; sometimes bleached clays or sands, like the subsoils of modern swamps ; sometimes loamy or sandy, or of the nature of hardened vegetable mould. They rarely contain any remains of aquatic animals, or of animals of any kind, but are filled with stigmaria roots and rootlets, and sometimes hold a few prostrate stems of trees.- While the underclay is thus a fossil soil, the roof or bed above the coal, usually of a shaly char- acter, is full of remains of leaves and stems and fruits, and often holds erect stumps, the remains of the last trees that grew in the swamp before it was finally covered up. Some of the thinnest coals, and some beds so thin and impure that they can scarcely be called coals at all, are the most instructive. Witness the following from my section ol the South Joggins. Coal Group i, of Division 3, is the highest of the series. Its section is as follows : — " Grey argillaceous shale. Coal, I inch. Grey argillaceous underclay, Stigmaria. "The roof holds abundance of fern leaves {Alethopteris * For details stt Journal Geol. Society of London, 1865 ; and " Acadian Oeology," last edition, 1S91. - At the South Joggins, in two or three cases, beds of bituminous shale full of Naiadites and Cyprids have by elevation and drying become fit for the growth of trees with stigmaria roots ; but this is quite e.xceptional, no doubt arising from the accidental draining of lakes or lagoons on their elevation above the sea level. 240 THE GROWTH OF COAL lonchitica). The coal is coarse and earthy, with much epider- mal and bast tissue, spore cases, etc., vascular bundles of ferns and impressions of bark of Sigillaria and leaves of Cordaites. It may be considered as a compressed vegetable soil resting on a subsoil full of rootlets of Stigmaria." In this case the coal is an inch in thickness, but there are many beds where the coal is a mere film, and supports great erect stems of Sigillaria, sending downward their roots in the form of branching Stigmarise into the underclay, thus proving that the Stigmaria:; of the underclays are the roots of the Sigillarias of the coals and their roofs. Here is another example which may be called a coal group, and is No. 1 1 of the same division : " Grey argillaceous shale, erect Calamites. Coal, I inch. Grey argillaceous underclay, Stigmaria, ift. 6in. Coal, 2 inches. Grey argillaceous underclay, Stigmaria, 4 in. Coal, I inch. Grey argillaceous underclay, Stigmaria. " This is an alternation of thin, coarse coals with fossil soils. The roof shale contains erect Calamites, which seem to have been the last vegetation which grew on the surface of the upper coal." Such facts, with many minor varieties, extend through the whole eighty-one coal groups of this remarkable section, as any one may see by referring to the paper and work cited in the preceding note. It is possibly because in most coal fields the smaller and commercially useless beds are so little open to observation, that so crude ideas derived merely from imperfect access to the beds that are worked exist among geologists. The following summary of facts may perhaps serve to place the evidence as to the mode of accumulation of coal fairly before the reader : — THE GROWTH OF COAL 24 1 (i) The occurrence of Stigmaria under nearly every bed of coal proves, beyond question, that the material was accum- ulated by growth /;/ situ, while the character of the sediments intervening between the beds of coal proves with equal cer- tainty the abundant transport of mud and sand by water. In other words, conditions similar to those of the swampy deltas of great rivers, or the swampy flats of the interiors of great con- tinents, are implied. (2) The true coal consists principally of the flattened bark of sigillaroid and other trees, intermixed with leaves of ferns and Cordaiies, and other herbaceous debris, including vast numbers of spores and spore cases, and with fragments of decayed wood constituting "mineral charcoal,'' all their materials having manifestly alike grown and accumulated where we find them. (3) The microscopical structure and chemical composition of the beds of cannel coal and earthy bitumen, and of the more highly bituminous and carbonaceous shales, show them to have been of the nature of the fine vegetable mud which accumulates in the ponds and shallow lakes of modern swamps. These beds are always distinct from true subaerial coal. When such fine vegetable sediment is mixed, as is often the case, with mud, it becomes similar to the bituminous lime- stone and calcareo-bituminous shales of the coal measures. (4) A few of the underclays which support beds of coal are of the nature of the vegetable mud above referred to ; but the greater part are argillo-arenaceous in composition, v^-ith little vegetable matter, and bleached by the drainage from them of water containing the products of vegetable decay. They are, in short, loamy or clay soils in the chemical con- dition in which we find such soils under modern bogs, and must have been sufficiently above water to admit of drainage. The absence, or small quantity of sulphides, and the occur- rence of carbonate of iron in connection with them, prove that 242 THE GROWTH OF COAL when they existed as soils, rain water, and not sea water, per- colated them. (5) The coal and the fossil trees present many evidences of subaerial conditions. Most of the erect and prostrate trees had become hollow shells of bark before they were finally imbedded, and their wood had broken into cubical pieces of mineral charcoal. Land snails and galley worms {Xy/obius) crept into them, and they became dens or traps for reptiles. Large quantities of mineral charcoal occur on the surfaces of all the larger beds of coal. None of these appearances could have been produced by subaqueous action. (6) Though the roots of Sigi/iaria bear some resemblance to the rhizomes of certain aquatic plants, yet structurally they have much resemblance to the roots of Cycads, which the stems also resemble. Further, the Sigi/Iarhi; grew on the same soils which supported conifers, Lepidodendra, Cordaitcs, and ferns, plants which could not have grown in water. Again, with the exception, perhaps, of some Pinnularue and Astero- phyllites, and Rhizocarpean spores, there is a remarkable absence from the coal measures of any form of properly aquatic vegetation. (7) The occasional occurrence of marine or brackish-water animals in the roofs of coal beds, or even in the coal itself, affords no evidence of subaqueous accumulation, since the same thing occurs in the case of modern submarine forests. Such facts merely imply that portions of the areas of coal accumulation were liable to inundation of a character so temporary as not finally to close the process, as happened when at last a roof shale was deposited by water over the coal. Cannel coals and bituminous shales holding mussel-like shells, fish scales, etc., imj)ly the existence sometimes for long periods of ponds, lakes or lagoons in the coal swamps, but ordinary coal did not accumulate in these. It is in the cannels and similar subaqueous coals that the macrospores which I THE GROWTH OF COAL 243 attribute in great part to aquatic plants, allied to modern Salvinia, etc., are chiefly found. ^ For these and other reasons, some of which are more fully stated in the papers referred to, while I admit that the areas of coal accumulation were frequently submerged, I must maintain that the true coal is a subaerial accumulation by vegetable growth on soils wet and swampy, it is true, but not submerged. I would add the further consideration, already urged elsewhere, that in the case of the fossil forests associated with the coal, the conditions of submergence and silting-up which have pre- served the trees as fossils, must have been precisely those which were fatal to their existence as living plants, a fact sufficiently evident to us in the case of modern submarine forests, but often overlooked by the framers of theories of the accumulation of coal. It seems strange that the occasional inequalities of the floors of the coal beds, the sand or gravel ridges which traverse them, the channels cut through the coal, the occurrence of patches of sand, and the insertion of wedges of such material splitting the beds, have been regarded by some able geologists as evidences of the aqueous origin of coal. In truth, these appearances are of constant occurrence in modern swamps and marshes, more especially near their margins, or where they are exposed to the effects of ocean storms or river inun- dations. The lamination of the coal has also been adduced as a proof of aqueous deposition ; but the miscroscope shows, as I have elsewhere pointed out, that this is entirely different from aqueous lamination, and depends on the superposition of successive generations of more or less decayed trunks of trees and beds of leaves. The lamination in the truly aqueous can- nels and carbonaceous shales is of a very different character. It is scarcely necessary to remark that in the above summary ' "Geological History of Plants," Bulletin Chicago Academy oj Sciences, 1886. 244 I'HE GROWTH OF COAI- I have had reference principally to my o'.vn observations in the coal formation of Nova Scotia; but similar facts have been detailed by many other observers in other districts. ^ A curious point in connection with the origin of coal is the question how could vegetable matter be accumulated in such a pure condition ? There is less difficulty in regard to this if we consider the coal as a swamp accumulation in situ. It is in this way that the purest vegetable accumulations take place at present, whereas in lakes and at the mouths of rivers vege- table matter is always mixed up with mud. Coal swamps, however, must have been liable to submergences or to tem- porary inundations, and it is no doubt to these that we have to attribute the partings of argillaceous matter often found in coal beds, as well as the occasional gulches cut into the coal and filled with sand and lenticular masses of earthy matter. To a similar cause we must also attribute the association of cannel with ordinary coal. The cannel is really a pulpy, macerate mass of vegetable matter accumulated in still water, surrounded and perhaps filled with growing aquatic herbage. Hence it is in such beds that we find the greatest accumulations of macro- spores, derived, probably, in great part from aquatic plants. Euckland long ago compared the matter of cannel to the semifluid discharge of a bursting bog, and Alex. Agassiz has more recently shown that in times of flood the vegetable muck of the Everglades of Florida flows out in thick inky streams, and may form large beds of vegetable matter having the character of the materials of cannel. It is evident that in swamps of so great extent as those of the coal formation, there must have been shallow lakes and ponds, and wide sluggish streams, forming areas for the accumulation of vegetable debris and this readily accounts for the association of ordinary beds of coal with those of cannel, and with bituminous shales or ' Especially Brongniart, Goeppert, Hawkshaw, Lyell, Logan, De la Boclie, Beaumont, Biiiney, Rogers, Lcsquereux, Williamson, Grand' Eury. THE GROWTH OF COAL 245 earthy bitumen, as well as fur the occurrence of scales of fish and other aquatic animals in such beds. Lyell's interesting observation of the submerged areas at New Madrid, keeping free of Mississippi mud, because fringed with a filter of cane- brake, shows that the areas of coal accumulation might often be inundated v.ithout earthy deposit, if, as seems probable, they were fringed with dense brakes of calamites, sheltering them from the influx of muddy water. It seems also certain that the water of the coal areas would be brown and laden with imperfect vegetable acids, like that of modern bogs, and such water has usually little tendency to deposit any mineral matter, even in the pores of vegetable fragments. The only exception to this is one which also occurs in modern swamps, namely, the tendency to deposit iron, either as carbonate (Clay Ironstone), or sulphide (Iron Pyrite), both of which are products of modern bogs, and equally characteristic of the coal swamps. Where great accumulations of sediment are going on, as at the mouths of modern rivers, there is a tendency to subsidence of the area of the deposit, owing to its weight. This applies, perhaps, to a greater extent to coal areas. Thus the area of a coal swamp would ultimately sink so low as to be overflowed, and a roof shale would be deposited to bury up the bed of coal, and transmit it to future ages, chemically, and mechanically changed by pressure and by that slow decomposition which gradually converts vegetable matter into carbon and hydrocar- bons. The long continuance and great extent of these alterna- tions of growth and subsidence is perhaps the most extraordinary fact of all. At the South Joggins, if we include the surfaces having erect trees with those having beds of coal, the process of growth of a forest or bog, and its burial by subsidence and deposition must have been repeated about a hundred times before the final burial of the whole under the thick sandstones of the Upper Carboniferous and Permian. 246 THE GROWTH OF COAL Mention has been made of Sigillaria and other trees of the coal formation period. These trees and others alHed to them, of which there were many kinds, may be Hkened to gigantic club mosses, which they resembled in fruit and foliage, though vastly more complex in structure of stem and branch. Some of them, perhaps, were of much higher rank than any of the modern plants most nearly allied to them. One of their most remarkable features was that of their roots — those Stigmarise, to which so frequent reference has been made. They differed from modern roots, not only in some points of structure, but in their regular bifurcation, and in having huge root fibres articulated to the roots, and arranged in a regular spiral manner, like leaves. They radiate regularly from a single stem, and do not seem to have sent up buds or secondary stems. They thus differed from the botanical definition of a root, and also from that of a rhizoma, or root stock ; being, in short, a primitive and generalized contrivance, suited to trees them- selves primitive and generalized, and to special and peculiar circumstances of growth. Some botanists have imagined that they were aquatic plants, growing at the bottom of lakes, but their mode of occurrence negatives this. I have elsewhere stated this as follows : — ^ " It is quite certain that Stigmariai are not ' rhizomes which floated in water, or spread themselves out on the surface of mud.' Whether rhizomes or not, they grew in the soil, or in the upper layers of peaty deposits since changed into coal. The late Richard Brown and the writer have shown that they grew in the underclays or fossil soils, and that their rootlets radiated in these soils in all directions." In one of my papers I have figured a Stigmarian root penetrating through an erect Sigilla?-ia, and Logan, in his Report of 1845, had already ' Natural Science, May, 1S92. '' Quart. Jourii. Geol. Soc, vol. ii. p. 394 (1846) ; //'/7* « v\-"m.'^^ •^^\fl 5 ?'' V-" z ^ -3 1) ^ u p c o p*. ^ o ^ S d rt '/i tn i) "*; o ^ ^ •*-' " c/) O Y. t) ^ < rt o ^ ^ ^ _o 7. "jj < C u tn £ 'w D 'u U U. O B c in *^ t/; r! 3 o s J:^ H ri THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 273 in each case, it is often impossible in breaking up the hard matrix to recover more than a portion of them. The original description by Owen was therefore based on somewhat imperfect material, but additional specimens subsequently found have supplemented it in such a manner as to enable us somewhat completely to restore in imagination the form of the animal, which, though much smaller than Baphetes, agrees with it in its sculptured bones, in its bony armature, especially beneath, and in its plicated teeth. In form, Detidrerpeton Acadianutn was probably lizard-like ; with a broad flat head, short stout Umbs and an elongated tailj and having its skin, and more particularly that of the belly, protected by small bony plates closely overlapping each other, and arranged en chevron, in oblique rows meeting on the mesial line, where in front was a thoracic plate. It may have attained the length of two feet. The form of the head is not unlike that of Baphetes, but longer in proportion ; and much resembles that of the labyrinthodont reptiles of the Trias. The bones of the skull are sculptured as in Baphefes, but in a smaller pattern. The fore limb of the adult animal, including the toes, must have been four or five inches in length, and is of massive proportions. The bones were hollow, and in the case of the phalanges the bony walls were thin, so that they are often crushed flat. The humerus, or arm bone, however, was a strong bone, with thick walls and a cancellated structure toward its extremities ; still even these have sometimes yielded to the great pressure to which they have been subjected. The cavity of the interior of the limb bones is usually filled with calcspar stained with organic matter, but showing no struc- ture ; and the inner side of the bony wall is smooth without any indication of cartilaginous matter lining it. The vertebrce, in the external aspect of their bodies, remind one of those of fishes, expanding toward the extremities, and 2/4 THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS being deeply hollowed by conical cavities, which appear even to meet in the centre. There is, however, a large and flattened neural spine. The vertebrre are usually much crushed, and it is almost impossible to disengage them from the stone. The ribs are long and curved, showing a reptilian style of chest. The posterior limb seems to have been not larger than the anterior, perhaps smaller. The tibia, or principal bone of the fore leg is much flattened at the extremity, as in some Labyrin- thodonts, and the foot must have been broad, and probably suited for swimming, or walking on soft mud, or both. That the hind limb was adapted for walking is shown, not merely by the form of the bones, but also by that of the pelvis. The external scales are thin, oblique-rhomboidal or elon- gated-oval, marked with slight concentric lines, but otherwise smooth, and having a thickened ridge or margin, in which they resemble those of Anhegosaiiri/s, and also those of Pholi- dogaster piscifonnis, described by Huxley from the Edinburgh coal field, — an animal which indeed apppears in most respects to have a close affinity with Dendrcrpeton. The microscopic structure of the scales is quite similar to that of the other bones, and different from that of the scales of ganoid fishes, the shape of the cells being batrachian. For other particulars of its structure reference may be made to the papers named at the end of the chapter. With respect to the affinities of the creature, I think it is obvious that it is most nearly related to the group of Labyrin- thodonts, and that it has the same singular mixture of batra- chian and reptilian characters which distinguish these ancient animals, and which give them the appearance of prototypes of the reptilian class. A second and smaller species of Den- drerpeton was subsequently obtained at the Joggins, and others have been found, more especially by Fritsch, in the Carboni- ferous and Permian of Europe. This ancient inhabitant of the coal swamps of Nova Scotia THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 2/5 was, in short, as we often find to be the case with the earUest forms of Hfe, the possessor of powers and structures not usu- ally, in the modern world, combined in a single species. It was certainly not a fish, yet its bony scales and the form of its vertebra3, and of its teeth, might, in the absence of other evi- dence, cause it to be mistaken for one. AVe call it a Batrachian, yet its dentition, the sculpturing of the bones of its skull, which were certainly no more external plates than the similar bones of a crocodile, its ribs, and the structure of its limbs, remind us of the higher reptiles ; and we do not know that it ever possessed gills, or passed through a larval or fish-like condition. Still, in a great many important characters, its structures are undoubtedly batrachian. It stands, in short, in the same position with the Lepidodendra and Siginafics under whose shade it crept, which, though placed by palaeobotanists in alliance with certain modern groups of plants, manifestly differed from these in many of their characters, and occupied a different position in nature. In the coal period the distinc- tions of physical and vital conditions were not well defined. Dry land and water, terrestrial and aquatic plants and animal.s, and lower and higher forms of animal and vegetable life, are consequently not easily separated from each other. This is no doubt a state of things characteristic of the earlier stages of the earth's history, yet not necessarily so ; for there are some reasons, derived from fossil plants, for believing that in the preceding Devonian period there was less of this, and conse quently that there may then have been a higher and more varied animal life than in the coal period. ^ The dentition of Dendrerpeton shows it to have been car- nivorous in a high degree. It may have captured fishes and smaller reptiles, either on land or in water, and very probably fed on dead carcases as well. If, as seems likely, any of the * See the author's paper on Devonian plants, Journal of the Geological Society, vol. xviii. p. 328. 2/6 THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS footprints referred to previously belong to this animal, it must have frequented the shores, either in search of garbage, or on its way to and from the waters. The occurrence of its remains in the stumps of Sigillaria, with land snails and milli- pedes, shows also that it crept in the shade of the woods in search of food ; and in noticing coprolitic matter, in a subse- quent page, I shall show that remains of excrementitious substances, probably of this species, contain fragments attri- butable to smaller reptiles, and other animals of the land. All the bones of Detidrerpeton hitherto found, as well as those of the smaller reptilian species hereafter described, have been obtained from the interior of erect Sigillariae, and all of these in one of the many beds, which, at the Joggins, contain such remains. The thick cellular inner bark of Sigillaria was very perishable ; the slender woody axis was somewhat more durable ; but near the surface of the stem, in large trunks, there was a layer of elongated cells, or bast tissue, of consider- able durability, and the outer bark was exceedingly dense and indestructible. ^ Hence an erect tree, partly imbedded in sediment, and subjected to the influence of the weather, be- came a hollow shell of bark ; in the bottom of which lay the decaying remains of the woody axis, and shreds of the fibrous bark. In ordinary circumstances such hollow stems would be almost immediately filled with silt and sand, deposited in the numerous inundations and subsidences of the coal swamps. Where, however, they remained open for a considerable time, they would constitute a series of pitfalls, into which animals walking on the surface might be precipitated ; and being prob- ably often partly covered by remains of prostrate trunks, or by vegetation growing around their mouths, they would be places of retreat and abode for land snails and such creatures. When the surface was again inundated or submerged, all such ' See a paper by the author, on the Structures of Coal, Journal of the Geological Society, vol. xv. ; also " Supplement to Acadian Geology." A REPTII.IFEROUS Tree ill sitit. South Joggins, N. Scotia. This is a sketch of a tree which afforded remains of Dendrerpeton, Pupae, etc. THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 2// animals, with the remains of those which had fallen into the deeper pits, would be imbedded in the sediment which would then fill up the holes. These seem to have been the precise conditions of the bed which has afforded all these remains. The history of a bed containing reptiliferous erect trees would thus be somewhat as follows : — ■ A forest or grove of the large-ribbed trees known as Sigil- laricE, was either submerged by subsidence, or, growing on low ground, was invaded with the muddy waters of an inundation, or successive inundations, so that the trunks were buried to the depth of several feet. The projecting tops having been removed by subaerial decay, the buried stumps became hollow, while their hard outer bark remained intact. They thus be- came hollow cylinders in a vertical position, and open at top. The surface having then become dry land, covered with vegeta- tion, was haunted by small quadrupeds and other land animals, which from time to time fell into the open holes, in some cases nine feet deep, and could not extricate themselves. On their death, and the decomposition of their soft parts, their bones and other hard portions remained in the bottom of the tree intermixed with any vegetable debris or soil washed in by rain, and which formed thin layers separating successive animal deposits from each other. Finally, the area was again sub- merged or overflowed by water, bearing sand and mud. The hollow trees were filled to the top, and their animal contents thus sealed up. At length the material filling the trees was by pressure and the access of cementing matter hardened into stone, not infrequently harder than that of the containing beds, and the whole being tilted to an angle of 20°, and elevated into land exposed to the action of the tides and waves, these singular coffins present themselves as stony cylinders projecting from the cliff or reef, and can be extracted and their contents studied. The singular combination of accidents above detailed was, s. E. 20 278 THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS of course, of very rare occurrence, and in point of fact we know only one set of beds at the South Joggins in which such remains so preserved occur ; nor is there, so far as I am aware, any other known instance elsewhere. Even in the beds in question only a portion of the trees, about fifteen in thirty, have afforded animal remains. We have, however, thus been enabled to obtain specimens of a number of species which would probably otherwise have been unknown, being less likely than others to be preserved in properly aqueous de- posits. Such discoveries, on the one hand impress us with the imperfection of the geological record ; on the other, they show us the singular provisions which have been made in the course of geological time for preserving the relics of the ancient world, and which await the industry and skill of collectors to disclose their hidden treasures. I may add that I believe all the trees, about thirty in num- ber, which have become exposed in this bed since its dis- covery, have been ransacked for such remains ; and that while the majority have afforded some reward for the labour, some have been far more rich than others in their contents. It is also to be observed that owing to the mode of accumulation of the mass filling the trees, the bones are usually found scat- tered in every position, and those of different species inter- mingled ; and that being often much more friable than the matrix, much labour is required for their development ; while after all has been done, the result is a congeries of fragments. A few specimens only have been found, showing skeletons complete, or nearly so, and I shall endeavour to figure one or two of these by way of illustration in the present chapter. The beds on a level with the top of the reptiliferous erect trees are arenaceous sandstones, with numerous erect Cala- 7nites. I have searched the surfaces of these beds in vain for bones or footprints of the reptiles which must have traversed them, and which, but for hollow erect trees, would apparendy ^^^ ^.».^- '^■ >' ^T'<.: A TYi'icAL Carboniferous IMicrosauriax, Hylonomus Lyeni—V.c- storation showing dermal armour and ornaments. Skeleton restored from measurements of the bones of the type specimen figured at the beginning of the chapter. THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 279 have left no trace of their existence. On a surface of s'milar character, sixty feet higher, and separated by three coals, with their accompaniments, and a very thick compact sandstone, I observed a series of footprints, which may be those of Deudrer- feton or Hylonomus. Species of Microsauria. Hylonomus Lyelli. In the original reptilifcrous tree discovered by Sir C. Lyell and the writer, at the Joggins, in 1851, there were, beside the bones of Dendrerpeton Acadianian, some small elongated vertebrae, evidently of a different species. These were first detected by Prof. Wyman, in his examination of these speci- mens, and were figured, but not named, in the original notice of the specimens. In a subsequent visit to the Joggins I obtained from another erect stump many additional remains of these smaller reptiles, and, on careful comparison of the .speci- mens, was induced to refer them to three species, all appa- rently generically allied. I proposed for them the generic name Hylonomus, " forest dweller." They were described in the Proceedings of the Geological Society for 1859, with illustra- tions of the teeth and other characteristic parts. ^ The smaller species first described I named H. ]Vyma>u' ; the next in size, that to which this article refers, and which was represented by a larger number of specimens, I adopted as a type of the genus, and dedicated to Sir Charles Lyell. The third- and largest, represented only by a few fragments of a single skeleton, was named H. aciedcntatus. This I had subsequently to remove to a new genus, Smilerpetoii. Hylonomus Lyelli was an animal of small size. Its skull is about an inch in length, and its whole body, including the tail, could not have been more than six or seven inches long. The bones appear to have been thin and easily separable ; and even ^Journal of Geological Society, vol. xvi. 28o THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS when they remain together, are so much crushed as to render the shape of the skull not easily discernible. They are smooth on the outer surface to the naked eye ; and under a lens show- only delicate, uneven striae and minute dots. They are more dense and hard than those of Dendrerpeton^ and the bone cells are more elongated in form. The bones of the snout would seem to have been somewhat elongated and narrow. A speci- men in my possession shows the parietal and occipital bones, or the greater part of them, united and retaining their form. ^Ve learn from them that the brain case was rounded, and that there was a parietal foramen. There would seem also to have been two occipital condyles, as in modern Batrachians. Several well-preserved specimens of the maxillary and mandibular bones have been obtained. They are smooth, or nearly so, like those of the skull, and are furnished with numerous sharp, conical teeth, anchylosed to the jaw, in a partial groove formed by the outer ridge of the bone. In the anterior part of the lower jaw there is a group of teeth larger than the others. The total number of teeth in each ramus of the lower jaw was about forty, and the number in each maxillary bone about thirty. The teeth are perfectly simple, hollow within, and with very fine radiating tubes of ivory. The vertebrae have the bodies cyclindrical or hour-glass shaped, covered with a thin, hard, bony plate, and having within a cavity of the form of two cones, attached by the apices. This cavity was com- pletely surrounded by bone, as it is filled with stained calcspar in the same manner as the cavities of the limb bones. It was probably occupied by cartilage. The vertebrae were apparently bi-concave, and are furnished with upper and lateral processes similar to those of small lacertian animals. The ribs are long, curved, and at the proximal end have a shoulder and neck. They are hollow, with thin hard bony walls. The anterior limb, judging from the fragments procured, seems to have been slender, with long toes, four or possibly five in number. The THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 28 1 posterior limb was longer and stronger, and attached to a pelvis so large and broad as to give the impression that the creature enlarged considerably in size toward the posterior ex- tremity of the body, and that it may have been in the habit of sitting erect. The thigh bone is large and well formed, with a distinct head and trochanter, and the lower extremity flattened and moulded into two articulating surfaces for the tibia and fibula, the fragments of which show that they were much shorter. The toes of the hind feet have been seen only in detached joints. They seem to have been thicker than those of the fore foot. Detached vertebrae, which seem to be caudal, have been found, and show that the tail was long and probably not flattened. The limb bones are usually somewhat cru.shed and flattened, especially at their articular extremities, and this seems to have led to the error of supposing that this flattened form was their normal condition ; there can be no doubt, how- ever, that it is merely an effect of pressure. The limb bones present in cross section a wall of dense bone with elongated bone- cells, surrounding a cavity now filled with brown calcspar, and originally occupied with cartilage or marrow. I desire to specify the above points because I believe that most of the creatures referred by Fritsch, Credner, and other European naturalists to the Microsauria are of inferior grade to Hylonomus, though admitted to present points of approximation to the true rep- tiles. Woodward has recently described the remains of a Microsaurian from the English coal formation. Nothing is more remarkable in the skeleton of this creature than the con- trast between the perfect and beautiful forms of its bones, and their imperfectly ossified condition, a circumstance which raises the question whether these specimens may not represent the young of some reptile of larger size. The dermal covering of this animal is represented in part by oval bony scales, which are so constantly associated with its bones that I can have no doubt that they belonged to it, being, ^Sj the oldest air-breathers perfsapsw ttte cfedung: of its low^r or abdominal parts. But the - - , ,:re ^&s^ >tod<«ti Bastescimits aie cfearjectenstKaLBT nabei ami feisesv One of the specimens ot HrloncwiTS had associated ^ " ■ ■ " '; " -' ^ -" ' ■ ' ':^'k and ca.r- . .:r.ed and so pKsarved br the water liliing the hollow tree impregnared — - ;-----.-- --- - — ;- --,.-:,--i-^ This skm iras coverevi -, - - -'x under the microscope, showed the structure ot bom rather than of bone. Besides these onSrraiT scales there were bonr pcominences. like rhose ot the homed taig, on the hack and shoulders, and a - - " ■ n- Beiades dsese there were in front arsd at the side rows of per»- t%rrr> or Iappe::s. oil - ■ -jT, thocgh nowpertectiT :_,_■_ _, :____ _. :_;_____ __:_, :._- :.ie Tsse of the ornsece covering,, and perhaps the questioo raises . . . _^ : - _ - - - ^ - ;>e of BaJiachians. ScTjdder suggests a somewhat prosaic use in - - " ;ra to be _ - - - :r- ae tne --s. aead some oc them almost as large m aze. But the word " ver>- : - -w-ae v^ - _ .lid traces of an imiired joint at tne aid of the taii in some :^?ecimai5. We :' the scc" - p«;hnrf«r it xmda" uic >.< ; n. were perieczed a: tois eariy usie. Thus we have in the ir back C^-~-"""""e-:'US ajre a creature as THR '■ air-j^^kath; ekboratdy ornameaited arid protected a$ st»y of ^iosed to cofi£orm. I isaay add be:ts, tho«^ tfaey <&1 jskX appear liO isiajsre tr>e 'Ilie answer k tiiat ^ae cascBaaastaiJoes of preserve of reptikrs f^jnnn m the Carv/n/f-ero^a^ It 13 evwient frocn true rerr :: in ffylonorf .'^ - ■ - -^ - ^- arijd stout <:a5*- strong and thdr articulaiioc y finaa, to have . 'J leap. _ - ., ... , . -. , - '^ more finraly knit tiaan tiioee of De»drirfet'm. YwCe^. 'Sm. ryaexrdy a more hi^lj viialized jaaoscular srsseia. If to do^se puzzling in its afiiruEtjes vben a.raatoms.':-. ^ered. k ciearir not to be ranked as Lo^r ir -' : -. - - ' "viem tailed Barrach:ajis. or even -. . . - imasi add to these also, as importaia pc-n^ o«r' cusereace, ir^ bocj icales widi irBidi it vas armed bekyir,. and ti^ie oraaaie apcja- 284 THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS ratus of horny appendages, with which it was clad above. These last, as described in the last section, show that this little animal was not a squalid, slimy dweller in mud, like Meno- branchiis and its allies, but rather a beautiful and sprightly tenant of the coal-formation thickets, vying in brilliancy, and perhaps in colouring, with the insects which it pursued and devoured. Remains of as many as eight or ten individuals have been obtained from three erect Sigillariae, indicating that these creatures were quite abundant, as well as active and ter- restrial in their mode of life. With respect to the affinities of this species, I think it is abundantly manifest that it presents no close relationship with any reptile hitherto discovered in the Carboniferous system, except perhaps some of the smaller forms in the Permian of Europe, with which Credner and Fritsch have compared it. It is scarcely necessary to say that the characters above described entirely remove this animal from the Labyrinthodonts. Equal difficulties attend the attempt to place it in any other grou}) of recent or extinct Batrachians or proper reptiles. The struc- tures of the skull, and of some points in the vertebra?, certainly resemble those of Batrachians ; but, on the other hand, the well-developed ribs, evidently adapted to enlarge the chest in respiration, the pelvis, and the cutaneous covering, are un- exampled in modern Batrachians, and assimilate the creature to the true lizards. I ha\e already, in my original description of the animal in 1859, expressed my belief that Hylonovitis may have had lacertian affinities, but I do not desire to speak too positively in this matter ; ^ and thall content myself with stating the following alternatives as to the probable relations of these animals, (i) They may have been true reptiles of low type, and with batrachian tendencies. (2) They may have been representatives of a new family of Batrachians, exhibit- ing in some points lacertian affinities. (3) They may have * I am glad to say that Fritsch and Credner now lean to the same view. THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 285 been the young of some larger reptile, too large and vigorous to be entrapped in the pitfalls presented by the hollow Sigil- laria stumps, and in its adult state losing the batrachian pecu- liarities apparent in the young. Whichever of these views we may adopt, the fact remains, that in the structure of this curi- ous little creature we have peculiarities both batrachian and lacertian, in so far as our experience of modern animals is concerned. It would, however, accord with observed facts in relation to other groups of extinct animals, that the primitive Batrachians of the coal period should embrace in their struc- tures points in after times restricted to the true reptiles. On the other hand, it would equally accord with such facts that the first-born of Lacertians should lean towards a lower type, by which they may have been preceded. My present impression is, that they may constitute a separate family or order, to w'hich I would give the name of Microsauria, and which may be regarded as allied, on the one hand, to certain of the humbler lizards, as the Gecko or Agama, and, on the ot];er, to the tailed Batrachians. It is likely that Hyloiionius Lyelli was less aquatic in its habits than Dendrerpeton. Its food consisted, apparently, of insects and similar creatures. The teeth would indicate this, and near its bones there are portions of coprolite, containing remains of insects and myriapods. It probably occasionally fell a prey to Dendrerpeton, as bones, which may have belonged either to young individuals of this species or to its smaller congener H. Jlyniani, are found in larger coprolites, which may be referred with probability to Dendrerpeton Acadianuin. This coprolitic matter, which is somewhat plentiful on some of the surfaces in the erect trees, also informs us that the im- prisoned animals may in some cases have continued to live for some time, feeding on such animals as may have fallen into their place of confinement, which was destined also to be their tomb. Some other points of interest appear on the 286 THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS examination of this excrementitious matter. It contains much carbonate of Hme, indicating that snails or other moUusks furnished a considerable part of the food of the smaller rep- tiles. Some portions of it are filled with chitinous fragments, parts of millipedes or insects, but usually so broken up as scarcely to be distinguishable. One curious exception was a part of the head of an insect containing a portion of one of its eyes. The facets of this can be readily seen with the micro- scope, and are similar to those of modern cockroaches. About 250 of these little eyes are discernible, and they must have been much more numerous. Two points are of interest here : First, the perfection of the compound eye for vision in air. It had long before, in the case of the Trilobites, been used for seeing under water. Secondly, the great age of the still ubi- quitous and aggressive family of the cockroaches. In point of fact the oldest known insect, the Protoblattina of the Silurian, is one of these creatures, and they are the most abundant in- sects in the Carboniferous, so that if they now dispute with us the possession of our food, they may at least put in the claim of prior occupancy of the world. In one mass a quantity of thickish crust or shell appears, which under the microscope presents a minutely tubular and laminated appearance. It may have belonged to some small crustacean or large scorpion on which a Dendrerpeton may have been feeding before it fellinto the pit in which it was entombed. In addition to the reptilian species above noticed, the erect trees of Coal Mine Point have afforded several others. There is a second and smaller species of Dendrerpeton {D. Oiveni) and other forms belonging to the group of Microsauria of which Hylonomus is the type. A second species of that genus (//. liy/na/ii) has already been mentioned. A similar creature, but of larger size and with teeth of a wedge or chisel shape, has been referred to a distinct genus, Smikrpeton. It seems to have been rare, and the only skeleton found is very imperfect. Dolichosotna longissimuin, a serpentiform rennian Batrachian after Fritsch. This and Hylonomus are opposite or extreme types in regard to general form. THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 287 Its teeth are of a form that may have served even for vegetable food, as their sharp edges must have had considerable cutting power. Another curious form of tooth appears in the genus Hylerpeton. It has the points worked into oblique grooves separated by sharp edges, which must have greatly aided in piercing tough integument. These creatures seem to have been of stout and robust build, with large limbs. Still another generic type {Frifschia) is represented by a species near to Hylonomus in several respects, and with long and beau- tifully formed limb bones, but with the belly protected with rod-like bodies instead of scales. In this respect Hylerpeton is somewhat intermediate, having long and narrow scales on the belly instead of the oval or roundish scales of Hylonomus. All these last-mentioned forms are Microsaurians, with simple teeth and well-developed ribs and limbs, and smooth cranial bones. Two other species are represented by portions of single skeletons too imperfect to allow them to be certainly determined. I would emphasize here that the vertebrate animals found in the erect trees are necessarily a selection from the most exclusively terrestrial forms, and from the smaller species of these. The numerous newt-like and serpentiform species found in the shales of the coal formation could not find access to these peculiar repositories, nor could the larger species of the Laby- rinthodonts and their allies, even if they were in the habit of occasionally prowling in the forests in search of prey, and this would scarcely be likely, more especially as the waters must have afforded to them much more abundant supplies of food. Of the numerous species figured by Fritsch, Cope and Huxley, only a few approach very near to the forms entrapped in the old hollow Sigillariae, though several have characters half ba- trachian and half reptilian. 288 THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS Invertebrate Air-breathers. The coal formation rocks have afforded Land Snails, jSIilli- pedes, Spiders, Scorpions and Insects, so that all the great types of invertebrate life which up to this day can live on land already had representatives in this ancient period. Some of them, indeed, we can trace further back, the land snails prob- ably to the Devonian, the Millipedes to the same period, and the Scorpions and insects as far as the Silurian. No land ver- tebrate is yet known, older than the Lower Carboniferous, but there is nothing known to us in physical condition, to preclude the existence of such creatures at least in the Devonian. It would take us too far afield to attempt to notice the in- vertebrate land life of the Palaeozoic in general. This has been done in great detail by Dr. Scudder. I shall here limit myself to the animals found in our erect trees, and merely touch in- cidentally on such others as may be connected with them. I have already mentioned the occurrence of a land snail, a true pulmonate moUusk, in the first find by Lyell and my- self at Coal Mine Point, and this was the first animal of this kind known in any rocks older than the Purbeck formation of England. It is one of the groups of so-called Chrysalis-shells, scarcely distinguishable at first sight from some modern West Indian species, and distinctly referable to the modern genus Pupa. It was named Pupa vetusta, and a second and smaller species subsequently found was named P. P/[i,^s/>r/, and a third of different form, and resembling the modern snails, bears the name Zonites priscus. The only other Palaeozoic land mol- lusks known at present are a few species found in the coal formation of Ohio, and a fragment supposed to indicate another species from the Devonian plant beds of St. John's, New Brunswick. This last is the oldest known evidence of pulmon- ate snails. If we ask the precise relations of these creatures to modern snails, it may be answered that of the two leading sub- S. E *s:5Mr^^ n^ Carbumferol's Land Snails. Pufa vetusla, Baiwin, and Coiiulus pnsca. Carpenter, with egg of Pupa vettista — Ihe whole considerably magnified. I published in iSSo, in the A'lteri- cait Journal of Science, a fragment of what seemed to be a land snail, from the Middle Erian plant beds of St. John, New Brunswick {Strophia grand- tcva, figured above), but have mentioned it with some doubt in the te.xt. Mr. G. F. Matthew has, however, recently communicated to the Royal Society of Canada a second species, found by Mr. W. I. Wilson in the same beds, and which he names Pupa priuurva. It is accompanied with a scorpion and a millipede. Thus the existence of Land Snails of the Pupa type in the Devonian may be considered as established. A Dkvonian Land Snail. THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 289 divisions of the group of air-breathing snails {Pitlmonifera), the Operculate, or those with a movable plate to close the mouth of the shell, and the Inoperculate, or those that are destitute of any such shelly lid or operculum to close the shell, the first has been traced no farther back than the Eocene. The second or inoperculate division, includes some genera that are aquatic and some that are terrestrial. Of the aquatic genera no re- presentatives are known in formations older than the Wealden and Purbeck, and these only in Europe. The terrestrial group, or the family of the Ifeh'cidie, which, singularly enough, is that which diverges farthest from the ordinary gill-bearing Gastero- pods, is the one which has been traced farthest back, and includes the Palaeozoic species. It is further remarkable that a very great gap exists in the geological history of this family. No species are known between the Carboniferous and the early Tertiary, though in the intervening formations there are many fresh-water and estuarine deposits in which such remains might be expected to occur. There is perhaps no reason to doubt the continuance of the Helicidas through this long por- tion of geological time, though it is probable that during the interval the family did not increase much in the numbers of its species, more especially as it seems certain that it has its culmination in the modern period, where it is represented by very many and large species, which are dispersed over nearly all parts of our continents. The mode of occurrence of the Palaeozoic Pulmonifcra in the few localities where they have been found is characteristic. The earliest known species, Pi/pa retiista, was found, as already stated, in the material filling the once hollow stem of a Sigillaria at the South Joggins in Nova Scotia, and many additional specimens have subsequently been obtained from similar repositories in the same locality, where they are associ- ated with bones of Batrachians and remains of Millipedes. Other specimens, and also the species Zonites pn'scus, have 290 THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS been found in a thin, shaly layer, containing debris of plants and crusts of Cyprids, and which was probably deposited at the outlet of a small stream flowing through the coal-formation forest. The two species found in Illinois occur, according to Bradley, in an underclay or fossil soil which may have been the bed of a pond or estuary, and subsequently became a forest subsoil. The Erian species occurs in shales charged with remains of land plants, and which must consequently have received abundant drainage from neighbouring land. It is only in such deposits that remains of true land snails can be expected to occur ; though, had fresh water or brackish water Pulmonates abounded in the Carboniferous age, their remains should have occurred in those bituminous and calcareo-bitu- minous shales which contain such vast quantities of debris of Cyprids, Lamellibranchs and fishes of the period, mixed with fossil plants. The specimen first obtained in 1887 having been taken by Sir Charles Lyell to the United States, and submitted to the late Prof. Jeffries Wyman, the shell in question was recognised by him and the late Dr. Gould, of Boston, as a land shell. It was subsequently examined by M. Deshayes and Mr. Gwyn Jeffries, who concurred in this determination ; and its micro- scopic structure was described by the late Prof. Quekett, of London, as similar to that of modern land shells. The single specimen obtained on this occasion was somewhat crushed, and did not show the aperture. Hence the hesitation as to its nature, and the delay in naming it, though it was figured and described in the paper above cited in 1852. Better specimens showing the aperture were afterward obtained by the writer, and it was named and described by him in his "Air-breathers of the Coal Period," in 1863. Owen, in his " Palaeontology," subsequently proposed the generic name Deiidropiipa. This I have hesitated to accept, as expressing a generic distinction not warranted by the facts ; but should THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 29 1 the shell be considered to require a generic or sub-generic distinction, Owen's name should be adopted for it. There seems, however, nothing to prevent it "from being placed in one of the modern sub-genera of simple-lipped Pupae. With regard to the form of its aperture, I may explain that some currency has been given to an incorrect representation of it, through defective specimens. In the case of delicate shells like this, imbedded in a hard matrix, it is of course difficult to work out the aperture perfectly ; and in my published figure in the "Air-breathers," I had to restore somewhat the broken specimens in my possession. This restoration, speci- mens subsequently found have shown to be very exact. As already stated, this shell seems closely allied to some modern Pupae. Perhaps the modern species which approaches most nearly to it in form, markings and size, is MacrocheUus Gossei from the West Indies, specimens of which were sent to me some years ago by Mr. Bland, of New York, with the remark that they must be very near to my Carboniferous species. Such edentulous species as Pupa {Leucoc/iila) fallax of Eastern America very closely resemble it ; and it was re- garded by the late Dr. Carpenter as probably a near ally of those species which are placed by some European concholo- gists in the genus Pupilla. Pupa vetusta has been found at three distinct levels in the coal formation of the South Joggins. The lowest is the shale above referred to. The next, 1,217 feet higher, is that of the original discovery. The third, 800 feet higher, is in an erect Sigillaria holding no other remains. Thus, this shell has lived in the locality at least during the accumulation of 2,000 feet of beds, including a number of coals and erect forests, as well as beds of bituminous .shales and calcareo-bituminous shale, the growth of which must have been very slow. In the lowest of these three horizons the shells are found, as already stated, in a thin bed of concretionary clay of dark 292 THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS grey colour, though associated with reddish beds. It contains Zonitcs priscus as well, though this is very rare, and there are a few valves of Cythere and shells of Naiadiies as well as carbonaceous fragments, fronds of ferns, 2^rigo)wcarpa, etc. The Piipce are mostly adult, but many very young shells also occur, as well as fragments of broken shells. The bed is evidently a layer of mud deposited in a pond or creek, or at the mouth of a small stream. In modern swamps multitudes of fresh-water shells occur in such places, and it is remarkable that in this case the only Gasteropods are land shells, and these very plentiful, though only in one bed about an inch in thickness. This would seem to imply an absence of fresh- water Pulmonifera. In the erect Sigillarice of the second horizon the shells occur either in a sandy matrix, more or less darkened with vegetable matter, or in a carbonaceous mass composed mainly of vegetable debris. Except when crushed or flattened, the shells in these rei)Ositories are usually filled with brownish calcite. From this I infer that most of them were alive when imbedded, or at least that they contained the bodies of the animals ; and it is not improbable that they sheltered themselves in the hollow trees, as is the habit of many similar animals in modern forests. Their residence in these trees, as well as the characters of their embryology, are illustrated by the occurrence of their mature ova. One of those, which I have considered worth figuring, has been broken in such a way as to show the embryo shell. They may also have formed part of the food of the reptilian animals whose remains occur with them. In illustration of this I have elsewhere stated that I have found as many as eleven unbroken shells of Fhysa heierostropha in the stomach of a modern Menobianchus. I think it certain, however, that both the shells and the reptiles occurring in these trees must have been strictly terrestrial in their habits, as they could not have found admission to the erect trees unless the ground had THE OLDEST AIR-DREATIIERS 20^ been sufficiently dry to allow several feet of the imbedded hollow trunks to be free from water. In the highest of the three horizons the shells occurred in an erect tree, but without any other fossils, and they had apparently been washed in along with a greyish mud.^ If we exclude the alleged Palieorbis referred to below, all the Palaeozoic Pulmonifera hitherto found are American. Since, however, in the Carboniferous age, Batrachians, Arach- nidans, Insects and Millipedes occur on both continents, it is not unlikely that ere long European species of land snails will be announced. The species hitherto found in Eastern America are in every way strangely isolated. In the plant beds of St. John, about 9,000 feet in thickness, and in the coal formation of the South Joggins, more than 7,000 feet in thickness, no other Gasteropods occur, nor, I believe, do any occur in the beds holding land snails in Illinois. Nor, as already stated,- are any of the aquatic Pulmonifera known in the Palceozoic. Thus, in so far as at present known, these Palreozoic snails are separated not only from any predecessors, if there were any, or successors, but from any contemporary animals allied to them. It is probable that the land snails of the Erian and Carboni- ferous were neither numerous nor important members of the faunae of those periods. Had other species existed in any considerable numbers, there is no reason why they should not have been found in the erect trees, or in those shales which contain land plants. More especially would the discovery of any larger species, had they existed, been likely to have occurred. Further, what we know of the vegetation of the Palreozoic period would lead us to infer that it did not abound ' The discovery of the shells in this tree was made by Albeit I. Hill, C.E. The tree is in Group XXVI. of Division 4 of my Joggins section. Tlie original rcpliliferous trees aic in Ciroiip X V., and ihe lowest bed in Groiip VIII. 294 THE OLDEST AIR BREATHERS in those succulent and nutritious leaves and fruits which are most congenial to land snails. It is to b^ observed, however, that we know little as yet of the upland life of the Erian or Carboniferous. The animal life of the drier parts of the low country is indeed as yet very little known ; and but for the revelations in this respect of the erect trees in one bed in the coal formation of Nova Scotia, our knowledge of the land snails and Millipedes, and also of an eminently terrestrial group of reptiles, the Microsanria, would have been much more imperfect than it is. We may hope for still further revelations of this kind, and in the meantime it would be premature to speculate as to the affinities of our little group of land snails with animals either their contemporaries or belonging to earlier or later formations, except to note the fact of the little change of form or structure in this type of life in that vast interval of time which separates the Erian period from the present day. It may be proper to mention here the alleged Pulmonifera of the genus Palxorbis described by some German naturalists. These I believe to be worm tubes of the genus Spirorbis, and in fact to be nothing else than the common ^. carbonariiis or S. piisillus of the coal formation. The history of this error may be stated thus. The eminent palasobotanists Germar, Goeppert and Geinitz have referred the Spirorbis, so common in the Coal measures to the fungi, under the name Gyromyccs, and in this they have been followed by other naturalists, though as long ago as 1868 I had shown that this little organism is not only a calcareous shell, attached by one side to vegetable inatters and shells of mollusks, but that it has the microscopic structure characteristic of modern shells of this type.^ More recently Van Beneden, Ca^nius, and Goldenberg, perceiving that the fossil is really a calcareous shell, but ' "Acadian Cleology,'" 2nd eilition, p. 205. Carhonifekous Mii.i.irEDES, Xylohiits Sii^illaihc, Darwin (-!ce and their con- temporaries must often have been placed in conditions un- favourable or fatal to them, and when their remains are preserved to us in these conditions, we may form very incorrect inferences as to their mode of life. Further, it is to be observed that the conditions of submergence and silting up which were favourable to the preservation of specimens of Sigillaricp as fossils, must have been precisely those which ' It is unfortunate that few writers on this subject have combined with the knowledge of the geological features of the coal a sufficient acquaint- ance with the phenomena of modern marshes and swamps, and with the conditions necessary for the growth of plants such as those of the coal. It would be easy to show, were this a proper place to do so, that the " swells," " rock faults," splitting of beds, and other appearances of coal seams quite accord with the tlieory of swamp accumulation ; that the plants associated with SigiliaricB could not have lived with their roots immersed in salt water ; that the chemical character of the underclays implies drainage and other conditions impossible under the sea ; that the composition and minute structure of the coal are incompatible with the supposition that it is a deposit from water, and especially from salt water; and that it would be more natural to invoke wind driftage as a mode of accumulation for some of the sandstones, than water driftage for the forma- tion of tlie coal. At the same tinve it is pretty certain that such beds as the cannels and earthy bitumens which appear to consist of finely com- minuted vegetable matter, without mineral charcoal, may have been de- posits of muck in shallow lakes or lagoons. " Journal of Ceol. Socy., vols. x. and xv. , and "Acadian Geology." too THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS were destructive to them as living plants ; and on the contrary, that the conditions in which these forests may have flourished for centuries must have been those in which there was little chance of their remains being preserved to us, in any other condition at least than that of coal, which reveals only to careful microscopic examination the circumstances, whether aerial or aquatic, under which it was formed. It is also noticeable that, in conditions such as those of the coal formation, it would be likely that some plants would be specially adapted to occupy newly emerged flats and places liable to inundation and silting up. I believe that many of the Sigillarice, and still more eminently the Calamilcs, were suit- able to such stations. There is direct evidence that the nuts named Trigonocarpa were drifted extensively by water over submerged flats of mud. Many Cardiocarpa were winged seeds which may have drifted in the air. The Calamites may, like modern Eqitiseta^ have produced spores with elaters cap- able of floating them in the wind. One of the thinner coals at the Joggins is filled with spores or spore cases that seem to have carried hairs on their surfaces, and may have been suited to such a mode of dissemination. I have elsewhere proved ^ that at least some species of Calamites were, by their mode of growth, admirably fitted for growing amid accumulating sedi- ment, and for promoting its accumulation. The reptiles of the coal formation are [probably the oldest known to us, and possibly, though this we cannot aftirm, the highest products of creation in this period. Supposing, for the moment, that they are the highest animals of their time, and, what is perhaps less likely, that those which we know are a fair average of the rest, we have the curious fact that they are all carnivorous, and the greater part of them fitted to find food in the water as well as on the land. 'J'he plant feeders of the period, on the land at least, are all invertebrates, as snails, * "Acadian Geology," chapter on Coal Plants. THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 30I millipedes, and perhaps insects. The air-breathing vertebrates are not intended to consume the exuberant vegetable growth, but to check the increase of its animal enemies. Plant life would thus seem to have had in every way the advantage. The millipedes probably fed only on roots and decaying sub- stances, the snails on the more juicy and succulent plants growing in the shadow of the woods, and the great predomi- nance of the family of cockroaches among carboniferous insects points to similar conclusions as to that class. While, moreover, the vegetation of the coal swamps was most abundant, it was not, on the whole, of a character to lead us to suppose that it supported many animals. Our knowledge of the flora of the coal swamps is sufficiently complete to exclude from them any abundance of the higher phaenogamous plants. We know little, it is true, of the flora of the uplands of the period ; but when we speak of the coal-formation land, it is to the flats only that we refer. The foliage of the plants on these flats with the exception of that of the ferns, was harsh and meagre, and there seem to have been no grasses or other nutritious herbaceous plants. These are wants of themselves likely to exclude many of the higher forms of herbivorous life. On the other hand, there was a profusion of large nut-like seeds, which in a modern forest would probably have afforded subsistence to squirrels and similar animals. The pith and thick soft bark of many of the trees must at certain seasons have contained much nutri- tive matter, while there was certainly sufficient material for all those insects whose larvae feed on living and dead timber, as well as for the creatures that in turn prey on them. It is re- markable that there seem to have been no vertebrate animals fitted to avail themselves of these vast stores of food. The question : " What may have fed on all this vegetation ? " was never absent from my mind in all my explorations of the Nova Scotia coal sections ; but no trace of any creature other than those already mentioned has ever rewarded my search. In S. E. 2 2 302 THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS Nova Scotia it would seem that a few snails, gally-worms, and insects were the sole links of connection between the plant creation and air-breathing vertebrates. Is this due to the paucity of the fauna, or the imperfection of the record ? The fact that a few erect stumps have revealed nearly all the air- breathers yet found, argues strongly for the latter cause ; but there are some facts bearing on the other side. A gally-worm, if, like its modern relatives, hiding in crevices of wood in forests, was one of the least likely animals to be found in aqueous deposits. The erect trees gave it its almost sole chance of preservation. Pupa vetiista is a small species, and its shell very thin and fragile, while it probably lived among thick vegetation. Further, the measures 2,000 feet thick, separating the lowest and highest beds in which it occurs, in- clude twenty-one coal seams, having an aggregate thickness of about twenty feet, three beds of bituminous limestone of animal origin, and perhaps twenty beds holding Stigfuaria in situ, or erect Sigil/a?-i(e and Calamites. The lapse of time implied by this succession of beds, many of them necessarily of very slow deposition, must be very great, though it would be mere guess work to attempt to resolve it into years. Yet long though this interval must have been, Pupa vetusta lasted without one iota of change through it all ; and, more remarkable still, was not accompanied by more than two other species of its fomily. Where so many specimens occur, and in situations so diverse, without any additional species, the inference is strong that no other of similar habits existed. If in any of those subtropical islands, whose climate and productions somewhat resemble those of the coal period, after searching in and about decaying trees, and also on the bars upon which rivers and lakes drifted their burdens of shells, we should find only three species, but one of these in very great numbers, we would surely conclude that other species, if present, were very rare. Again, footprints referable io Dend re >pe to u, or similar animals, THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 303 occur in the lower Carboniferous beds below the marine lime- stones, in the middle coal measures, and in the upper coal formation, separated by a thickness of beds which may be estimated at 15,000 feet, and certainly representing a vast lapse of time. Did we know the creature by these impressions alone, we might infer its continued existence for all this great length of time; but when we also find its bones in the princi- pal repositories of reptile remains, and in company with the other creatures found with it, we satisfy ourselves that of them all it was the most likely to have left its trail in the mud flats. We thus have reason to conclude that it existed alone during this period, in so far as its especial kind of habitat was con- cerned ; though there lived with it other reptiles, some of which, haunting principally the woods, and others the water, were less likely to leave impressions of their footprints. These may be but slight indications of truth, but they convey strong impressions of the persistence of species, and also of the pau- city of species belonging to these tribes at the time. If we could affirm that the Air-breathers of the coal period were really the first species of their families, they might acquire additional interest by their bearing on this question of origin of species. We cannot affirm this ; but it may be a harmless and not uninstructive play of fancy to suppose for a moment that they actually are so, and to inquire on this supposition as to the mode of their introduction. Looking at them from this point of view, we shall first be struck with the fact that they belong to all of the three great leading types of animals which include our modern Air-breathers — the Vertebrates, the Arthro- pods, and the IMollusks. We have besides to consider in this connection that the breathing organs of an insect are air tubes opening laterally (trachere), those of a land snail merely a modification of the chamber which in marine species holds the gills, while those of the reptiles represent the air bladder of the fishes. Thus, in the three groups the breathing organs are 304 THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS quite distinct in their nature and affinities. This at once ex- cludes the supposition that they can all have been derived from each other within the limits of the coal period. No transmu- tationist can have the hardihood to assert the convertibility, by any direct method, of a snail into a millipede or an insect, or of either into a reptile. The plan of structure in these crea- tures is not only different, but contrasted in its most essential features. It would be far more natural to suppose that these animals sprang from aquatic species of their respective types. We should then seek for the ancestors of the snail in aquatic Gasteropods, for those of the millipede in worms or Crustaceans, and for those of the reptiles in the fishes of the period. It would be easy to build up an imaginary series of stages, on the principle of natural selection, whereby these results might be effected ; but the hypothesis would be destitute of any sup- port from fact, and would be beset by more difficulties than it removes. Why should the result of the transformation of water snails breathing by gills be a Pupa 1 Would it not much more likely be an Auricula or a Limnca ? It will not solve this difficulty to say that the intermediate forms became ex- tinct, and so are lost. On the contrary, they exist to this day, though they were not, in so far as we know, introduced so early. But negative evidence must not be relied on ; the record is very imperfect, and such creatures may have existed, though unknown to us. It may be answered that they could not have existed in any considerable numbers, else some of their shells would have appeared in the coal-formation beds, so rich in crustaceans and bivalve moUusks. Further, the little Pupa remained unchanged during a very long time, and shows no tendency to resolve itself into anything higher, or to descend to anything lower, while in the lowest bed in which it occurs it is associated with a round snail of quite different type. Here, if anywhere, in what appears to be the first introduction of air-breithing invertebrates, we should be able to find the THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 305 evidences of transition from the gills of the Prosobranchiate and the Crustacean to the air sac of the Pulmonate and the tracheae of the millipede. It is also to be observed that many other structural changes are involved, the aggregate of which makes a Pulmonate or a millipede different in every particular from its nearest allies among gill-bearing Gasteropods or Crustaceans. It may be said, however, that the links of connection be- tween the coal reptiles and fishes are better established. All the known coal reptiles have leanings to the fishes in certain characters ; and in some, as in Anhegosaurus, these are very close. Still the interval to be bridged over is wide, and the differences are by no means those which we should expect. \\'ere the problem given to convert a ganoid fish into an A>r/iegvsai/riis or Deiidrerpeton, we should be disposed to retain unchanged such characters as would be suited to the new habits of the creature, and to change only those directly related to the objects in view. We should probably give little attention to differences in the arrangement of skull bones, in the parts of the vertebra, in the external clothing, in the micro- scopic structure of the bone, and other peculiarities for serving similar purposes by organs on a different plan, which are so conspicuous so soon as we pass from the fish to the Batrachian. It is not, in short, an improvement of the organs of the fish that we witness so much as the introduction of new organs.^ The foot of the batrachian bears, perhaps, as close a relation to the fin of the fish as the screw of one steamship to the paddle wheel of another, or as the latter to a carriage wheel ; and can be just as rationally supposed to be not a new instrument, but the old one changed. In this connection even a footprint in the sand startles us as much as that of Friday did Robinson ^ An ingenious attempt by Prof. Cope, to deduce the batrachian foot from the fins of certain carboniferous fishes, will be found in the Froceed- iiigs of the Philos. Academy of Philadelpliia for the present year. 306 THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS Crusoe. We see five fingers and toes, and ask how this numerical arrangement started at once from fin rays of fishes all over the world ; and how it has continued unchanged till now, when it forms the basis of our decimal arithmetic. Again, our reptiles of the coal do not constitute a continuous series, and belong to a great number of distinct genera and families, nor is it possible that they can all, except at widely different times, have originated from the same source. It either happened, for some unknown reason, that many kinds of fishes put on the reptilian guise in the same period, or else the vast lapse of ages required for the production of a reptile from a fish must be indefinitely increased for the production of many dissimilar reptiles from each other; or, on the other hand, we must suppose that the limit between the fish and reptile being once overpassed, a facility for comparatively rapid changes became the property of the latter. Either supposition would, I think, contradict such facts bearing on the subject as are known to us. We commenced with supposing that the rejitiles of the Coal might possibly be the first of their fiiniily, but it is evident from the above considerations, that on the doctrine of natural selection, the number and variety of reptiles in this period would imply that their predecessors in this fi)rni must have existed from a time as early as any in which even fishes are known to exist ; so that if we adopt any hypothesis of deriva- tion, it would probably be necessary to have recourse to that which supposes at particular periods a sudden and as yet un- accountable transmutation of one form into another; a view whi(-h, in its remoteness from anything includeil under ordinary natural laws, does not materially differ from that currently re- ceived idea of creative intervention, with whith, in so far as our coal repfiles can inform us, we are for the present satisfied. There is one other point which strikes the naturalist in con- sidering these animals, and whicli has a certain bearing on such THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 307 hypothesis. It is the combination of various grades of reptihan types in these ancient creatures. It has been well remarked by Hugh Miller, and more fully by Agassiz, that this is charac- teristic of the first appearance of new groups of animals. Now selection, as it acts in the hands of the breeder, tends to specialization ; and natural selection, if there is such a thing, is supposed to tend in the same direction. But when some dis- tinctly new form is to be introduced, an opposite tendency seems to prevail, a sort of aggregation in one species of char- acters afterward to be separated and manifested in distinct groups of creatures. The introduction of such new types also tends to degrade and deprive of their higher properties pre- viously existing groups of lower rank. It is easy to perceive in all this, law and order, in that higher sense in which these terms express the will and plan of the Supreme Mind, but not in that lower sense in which they represent the insensate operation of blind natural forces. Refekexcls : — " Air-bieathurs of the Coal rciiod."' Montreal, 1S86. Papers on Reptiles, etc., in South Joggins Coal Field, Journal 0/ Geological Society of London, vols. ix. x. xi. xvi. Remains of Ani- mals in Erect Trees in the Coal Formation of Nova Scolia, Trans. Koyal Society, 1881. "Acadian Geology," fourth edition, 1891. Re- vision of Land Snails of the Pahcozoic Era, Am. Journal of Science, vol. XX., 1880. Supplementary Report to Royal Society of London, Proceedings, 1S92. Notice of additional Reptilian Remains, Geo- logical Magazine of London, 1891. MARKINGS. FOOTPRINTS AND FUCOIDS. DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF THE LATE DR. J. J. BIGSBY, F.R.S., OF LONDON, The painstaking and accukate Author OF THE Thesaurus Siluricus and Devonico-Carbomferus, A warm and kind Friend and Christian Gentleman and one ok the Pioneers of Canadian Geology. Reminiscences of Lvei.l"s Work — Tidal Flats of the Bay of Funuv— -Rill Marks and Shrinkage Cracks — Worm Trails and Burrows — The Paces of Limu- lus — FucoiDS versus Trails — Footprints of ^'ER- tebrates os";- i:'W\\< ^|^mH,\ \ }' ^ ^ 5n r t 7 S ' ' \ i ~ !•■ \ .'\. \ Track of Limulus. — Modern, Oichaid Beach. Showing its resemblance to the Protechnites of the Cambrian. (Tage 320.) CHAPTER XI. MARKINGS, FOOTPRINTS AND FUCOIDS. I BELIEVE my attention was first directed to the markings made by animals on the surfaces of rocks, when travelling with the late Sir Charles Lyell in Nova Scotia, in 1842. He noticed with the greatest interest the trails of worms, insects, and various other creatures, and the footprints of birds on the surface of the soft red tidal mud of the Bay of Fundy, and subsequently published his notes on the various markings in these deposits in his "Travels in North America," and in a paper presented to the Geological Society of London. I well re- member how, in walking along the edge of the muddy shore, he stopped to watch the efforts of a grasshopper that had leaped into the soft ooze, and was painfully making a most complicated trail in his effort to escape. Sir Charles re- marked that if it had been so fortunate as to make these strange and complicated tracks on some old formation now hardened into stone and buried in the earth, it might have given occasion to much learned discussion. At a later period I found myself perplexed in the study of fossil plants by the evident errors of many palaeobotanists un- acquainted with modern markings on shores, in referring all kinds of mere markings to the vegetable kingdom, and espe- cially to the group of fucoids or seaweeds, which had become a refuge for destitute objects not referable to other kinds of fossils. It thus became necessary to collect and study these objects, as they existed in rocks of different ages, and to com- 312 MARKINGS, FOOTPRINTS AND FUCOIDS pare them with the examples afforded by the modern beach ; and perhaps no locaUty could have afforded better opportuni- ties for this than the immense tidal flats of the finest mud left bare by the great tides of the Bay of Fundy in Nova Scotia. At a more recent period still, the subject has come into great prominence in Europe, and if we are to gauge its importance by the magnitude of the costly illustrated works devoted to it by Delgado, Saporta, Nathorst, and others, and the multitude of scattered papers in scientific periodicals, we should regard it as one of the most salient points in Geology.^ It may be well further to introduce the subject by a few extracts from Lyell's work above referred to. "The sediment with which the waters are charged is ex- tremely fine, being derived from the destruction of cliffs of red sandstone and shale, belonging chiefly to the coal measures. On the borders of even the smallest estuaries communicating with a bay, in which the tides rise sixty feet and upwards, large areas are laid dry for nearly a fortnight between the spring and neap tides, and the mud is then baked in summer by a hot sun, so that it becomes solidified and traversed by cracks caused by shrinkage. Portions of the hardened mud may then be taken up and removed without injury. On ex- amining the edges of each slab we observe numerous layers, formed by successive tides, usually very thin, sometimes only one-tenth of an inch thick, of unequal thickness, however, because, according to Dr. ^\'ebster, the night tides rising a foot higher than the day tides throw down more sediment. When a shower of rain falls, the highest portion of the mud- covered flat is usually too hard to receive any impressions ; while that recently uncovered by the tide, near the water's edge, is too soft. Between these areas a zone occurs almost as smooth and even as a looking-glass, on which every drop forms a cavity of circular or oval form ; and if the shower be ^ Journal of Londo)! dologiial Society, \o\. vii. p. 239. MARKINGS, FOOTPRINTS AND FUCOIDS 313 transient, these pits retain their shape permanently, being dried by the sun, and being then too firm to be effaced by the action of the succeeding tide, which deposits upon them a new layer of mud. Hence we find, on splitting open a slab an inch or more thick, on the upper surface of which the marks of recent rain occur, that an inferior layer, deposited perhaps ten or fourteen tides previously, exhibits on its under surfiice perfect casts of rain prints which stand out in relief, the moulds of the same being seen in the layer below." After mentioning that a continued shower of rain obliterates the more regular impressions, and produces merely a blistered or uneven surface, and describing minutely the characteristics of true rain marks in their most perfect state, Sir Charles adds : — "On some of the specimens the winding tubular tracks of worms are seen, which have been bored just beneath the surface. Sometimes the worms have dived beneath the sur- face, and then re-appeared. Occasionally the same mud is traversed by the footprints of birds {Tringa mhnifa), and of musk-rats, minks, dogs, sheep and cats. The leaves also of the elm, maple and oak trees have been scattered by the winds over the soft mud, and having been buried under the deposits of succeeding tides, are found on dividing the layers. When the leaves themselves are removed, very faithful im- pressions, not only of their outline, but of their minutest veins, are left imprinted on the clay." This is a minor illustration of that application of recent causes to explain ancient effects of which the great English geologist was the apostle and advocate, and which he so admirably practised in his own work. It is also an illustration of the fact that things the most perishable and evanescent may, when buried in the crust of the earth, become its most durable monuments. Footprints in the sand of the tidal shore are in the ordinary course of events certain to be obliterated 314 MARKINGS, FOOTPRINTS AND FUCOIDS by the next tide ; but when carefully filled up by gently de- posited new material, and hardened into stone, there is no limit to their duration. Let us inquire how this may take place, and the tidal flats of the Bay of Fundy and Basin of Minas may supply us with the information desired. In the upper parts of the Bay of Fundy and its estuaries the rise and fall of tide, as is well known, are excessive. I quote the following description of the appearance they present from a work of earlier date : — " The tide wave that sweeps to the north-east, along the Atlantic coast of the United States, entering the funnel-like mouth of the Bay of Fundy, becomes compressed and elevated, as the sides of the bay gradually approach each other, until in the narrower parts the water runs at the rate of six or seven miles per hour, and the vertical rise of the tide amounts to sixty feet or more. In Cobequid and Chiegnecto Bays these tides, to an unaccustomed spectator, have rather the aspect of some rare convulsion of nature than of an ordinary daily phenomenon. At low tide wide flats of broNyn mud are seen to extend for miles, as if the sea had altogether retired from its bed ; and the distant channel appears as a mere strip of muddy water. At the commencement of flood a slight ripple is seen to break over the edge of the flats. It rushes swiftly forward, and, covering the lower flats almost instantaneously, gains rapidly on the higher swells of mud, which appear as if they were being dissolved in the turbid waters. At the same time the torrent of red water enters all the channels, creeks and estuaries ; surging, whirling, and foaming, and often having in its front a white, breaking wave, or ' bore,' which runs steadily forward, meeting and swallowing up the remains of the ebb still trickling down the channels. The mud flats are soon covered; and then, as the stranger sees the water gaining with noiseless and steady rapidity on the steep sides of banks and cliffs, a sense of insecurity creeps over him, as if no limit MARKINGS, FOOTPRINTS AND FUCOIDS 315 could be set to the advancing deluge. In a little time, how- ever, he sees that the fiat, ' Hitherto shalt thou come, and no farther,' has been issued to the great bay tide : its retreat com- mences, and the waters rush back as rapidly as they entered. " The rising tide sweeps away the fine material from every exposed bank and cliff, and becomes loaded with mud and extremely fine sand, which, as it stagnates at high water, it deposits in a thin layer on the surface of the flats. This layer, which may vary in thickness from a quarter of an inch to a quarter of a line, is coarser and thicker at the outer edge of the flats than nearer the shore ; and hence these flats, as well as the marshes, are usually higher near the channels than at their inner edge. From the same cause, — the more rapid de- position of the coarser sediment, — the lower side of each layer is arenaceous, and sometimes dotted over with films of mica, while the upper side is fine and slimy, and when dry has a shining and polished surface. The falling tide has little effect on these deposits, and hence the gradual growth of the flats, until they reach such a height that they can be overflowed only by the high spring tides. They then become natural or salt marsh, covered with the coarse grasses and carices which grow in such places. So far the process is carried on by the hand of nature ; and before the colonization of Nova Scotia, there were large tracts of this grassy alluvium to excite the wonder and delight of the first settlers on the shores of the Bay of Fundy. Man, however, carries the land - making process farther; and by diking and draining, excludes the sea water, and produces a soil capable of yielding for an indefinite period, without manure, the most valuable cultivated grains and grasses." The mud of these great tidal flats is at the surface of a red colour, and so fine that when the tide leaves it and its surface becomes dry, it shines in the sun as if polished. It is thus capable of taking the finest impressions. When the tide is in, S. E. 23 3l6 MARKINGS, FOOTPRINTS AND FUCOIDS numerous small fish of various species occupy the ground and may leave marks of their fins and tails as they gambol or seek their food. Shell fishes, worms, and Crustaceans scramble over the same surface, or make burrows in it. As the tide recedes flocks of sandpipers and crows follow it down, and leave an infinity of footprints, and even quadrupeds like the domestic hog go far out at low water in search of food. It is said that in some parts of the Bay the hogs are so assiduous in this pursuit that they even awake and go out on the flats in the night tide, and that they have so learned to dread the dangers of the flood, that when in the darkness they hear the dull sound of the approaching bore, they squeal with fear and rush madly for the shore. If we examine it minutely, we shall find that the tidal de- posit is laminated. The tidal water is red and muddy, and holds in suspension sediment of various degrees of coarseness. This, undergoes a certain process of levigation. In the first run of the flood the coarser material falls to the bottom. As its force diminishes the finer material is deposited, and at full tide, when the current has ceased, the finest of all settles, forming a delicate coat of the purest and most tenacious clay. Thus, if a block of the material is taken up and allowed to dry, it tends to separate into thin laminae, each of which re- presents a tide, and is somewhat sandy below, and passes into the finest moulding clay above. The tracks and impressions preserved are naturally made on the last or finest deposit, and filled in with the coarser or more sandy of the next tide. But this may take place in difi"erent ways. Impressions made under water at flood tide, or on the surface left bare by the ebb, may in favourable localities be sufiiciently tenacious or firm to resist the abrading action of the flood, and may thus be covered and preserved by the next layer, and in this way they may be seen on splitting up a block of the dried mud. But in shallow places and near the shore, where the deposit MARKINGS, FOOTPRINTS AND FUCOIDS 317 has time to consolidate and become dried by the sun and air before the next tide, much better impressions are preserved ; and lastly, on those parts of the shore which are reached only by the spring tides, the mud of the highest tide of course may have several days to harden before the next tide reaches it, and in this case it becomes cracked by an infinity of shrinkage cracks, which, when it is next covered with the tide, are filled with new sediment. In this way is produced in great perfec- tion that combination of footprints, or even of impressions of rain, with casts of cracks, which is so often seen in the older rocks. Where on the sides of channels or near the shore the mud has a considerable slope, another and very curious effect results. As the tide ebbs the water drains off the surface, or oozing out of the wet sand and mud, forms at the top of the bank minute grooves often no larger than fine threads. These coalesce and form small channels, and these, again, larger ones, till at low tide the whole sloping surface is seen to be covered with a smooth and beautiful tracery resembling the rivers on a map, or the impressions of the trunks and branches of trees, or the fronds of gigantic seaweeds. These " rill marks," as they have been called, are found in great abundance in the coal formation and triassic sandstones and shales, and I am sorry to say, have often been named and described as Fucoids, and illustrated by sumptuous plates. Sometimes these im- pressions are so fine as to resemble the venation of leaves, sometimes so large as to simulate trees, and I have even seen them complicated with shrinkage cracks, the edges of which were minutely crenulated by little rills running into them from the surface. It is further to be noticed that all these markings and im- pressions on tidal shores may, when covered by succeeding deposits, appear either in intaglio or relief. On the upper surface they are of course sunken, but on the lower surface of the bed deposited on them they are in relief. It often happens 3l8 MARKINGS, FOOTPRINTS AND FL'COIDS also that these casts in relief are the best preserved. This arises from the fact that the original moulds or impressions are usually made in clay, whereas the filling material is sandy, and the latter, infiltrated with calcareous or siliceous matter, may become a hard sandstone, while the clay may remain a comparatively soft shale. This tendency of casts rather than of moulds to be preserved sometimes produces puzzling effects. A cylindrical or branching trail thus often assumes the appear- ance of a stem, and any pits or marginal impressions assume the form of projections or leaves, and thus a trail of a worm or Gastropod or a rill mark may easily simulate a plant. It is to be observed, however, that these prominent casts are on the under side of the beds, that their material is continuous with that of the beds to which they belong, and that they are destitute of any carbonaceous matter. There are, however, cases where markings may be in relief, even on the upper surfaces of beds. The following are illustrations of this. Just as a man walking in newly fallen snow compresses it under his feet, and if the snow be afterwards drifted away or melted away by the sun, the compressed part resists longest, and may appear as a raised footmark, so tracks made on soft material may consolidate it so that if the soft mud be afterwards washed away the tracks may remain projecting. Again, worms eject earthy matter from their burrows, forming mounds, patches or raised ridges of various forms on the surface, and some animals burrow immediately under the surface, pushing up the mud over them into a ridge, while others pile up over their bodies pellets of clay, forming an archway or tunnel as they go. Zeiller has shown that the mole cricket forms curious roofed trails of this kind, and it seems certain that Crustaceans and marine worms of different kinds execute similar works, and that their roofed burrows, either entire or fallen in, produce curious imitations of branches of plants. The great and multiform army of the sea worms is indeed MARKINGS, FOOTPRINTS AND FUCOIDS 319 the most prolific source of markings on sea-formed rocks. Sometimes they cover very large surfaces of these, or penetrate the beds as perforations, with tortuous furrows, or holes per- fectly simple, or marked with little stride made by bristles or minute feet, sometimes with a fringe of little footmarks at each side, sometimes with transverse furrows indicating the joints of the animal's body. Multitudes of these markings have been described and named either as plants or as worm- tracks. Again, these creatures execute subterranean burrows, sometimes vertical, sometimes tortuous. These are often mere cylindrical holes afterwards filled with sand, but some- times they have been lined with a membranous tube, or with the rejectamenta of the food of the animals, or with little fragments of organic matter cemented together. Sometimes they open on the surface as simple apertures, but again they may be surrounded with heaps of castings, sometimes spiral in form, or with dumps of sand produced in their excavation, and which may assume various forms, according to circum- stances. Sometimes the aperture is double, so that they seem to be in pairs. Sometimes, for the convenience of the animal, the aperture is widened into the form of a funnel, and some- times the creature, by extending its body and drawing it in, surrounds its burrow with a series of radiating tracks simulat- ing the form of a starfish or sea anemone, or of the diverging branches of a plant. Creatures of higher grade, provided with jointed limbs, naturally make their actions known in more complicated ways. Some years ago I had the pleasure of spending a few weeks at the favourite sea-side resort of Orchard Beach on the New England coast, and there made my first acquaintance with that very ancient and curious creature the Limulus, or Horse-shoe Crab, or King-crab, as it is sometimes called. Orchard Beach is, I presume, near its northern range on our coast, and the specimens seen were not very large in size, though by no means 3-0 MARKINGS, FOOTPRINTS AND FUCOIDS rar^ and noc fnfreqnentLy cast on shore in storms. But the best fiicilities for studying their habits were found in a marsh aE no great distance from the hoteL where there were numerous rhannelss, ditches and little ponds filled with sea water at high tide. In these were multitudes of young T.imuli, varying firom an inch to three or four inches in breadth, and though many were dead or merely cast shells, it was easy to take young specimens with a hnding net. A number of these were se- cured, and I made it my busines for some rime to study their habits and mode of life, and especially the tracks which they made in sand or mud. The King-crabj viewed from above, consists ot three parts. The antarior shi^dd or carapace is semi-circular in form, with rs or projecting points at the angles, raised in the — .md sloping down to a smooth or moderately sharp edge ra fixtnt- The eyes are set like windows in this shield. Two large ones at the sides, which are compound eyes con- ssting of numerous ocelli or little eyes, and two microscopic oo^ in front, at the base of a little spine, which are simple. The second : - ' ~ -al part is also in one piece, somewhat quadrate in :"; : ridges and serratiires at the sides armed with spines, and which may be said to simulate the separate - ' ' '- the abdomen of an ordinary Crastacean is ^ : . - : --"d part is a long tail spine, triangular in cross section, sharply pointed, and so jointed to the posterior end of the abdomen that it can be freely moved in any direction as a bayonet-like weapon of defence. "When unable to escape &«MQ an enetny it is the habit of the creature to double itself up by be- i'- z ''- : " ' : " " :a against the carapace, and erecting the shar . . —lih fixed bayonet it awaits attack, like the kneeimg soldier in froat of a square. r :' '-•- :-— ;r shield, which is thin and papery in the jiomy in the adult, are the numerous limbs -ta:ure. wirfi which we are at present most concerned MARKINGS, FOOTPRINTS, AND FUCOIDS 32 1 Under the carapace are several pairs of jointed limbs differing in size and form. The two anterior are small and peculiarly formed claws, used apparently in manipulating the food. The four next are larger in size, and are walking feet, each furnished with two sharp points which form a pincer for holding. The last pair is much larger and stronger than any of the others, and armed not only ^yith a pair of pincers, but with four blunt nail- like points. Under the abdomen are flat swimming feet, as they have been called, each composed of a broad plate notched and divided in the middle. When at rest these lie flat on each other, but they can be flapped back and forth at the will of the animal. Let us now see what use the creature can make of these numerous and varied pedal appendages, and for distinctness' sake we shall call the anterior set thoracic and the posterior abdominal. When placed in shallow water on fine sand it walked slowly forward, and its tracks then consisted of a number of punctures on the sand in two lines. If, however, the water was very shallow or the sand very soft or inclined upward the two edges of the carapace touched the bottom, making a slight furrow at each side ; and if the tail was trailed on the bottom, this made a third or central furrow. When climbing a slope, or when placed at the edge of the water, it adopted another mode of locomotion, pushing with great force with its two posterior limbs, and thus moving forward by jerks. It then made four deep marks with the toes of each hind limb, and more or less interrupted marks with the edges of the cara- pace and the tail. In these circumstances the marks were al- most exactly like those of some forms of the Protichnites of the Potsdam sandstone. When in sufficiently deep water and de- sirous to escape, it flapped its abdominal feet, and then swam or glided close to the bottom. In this case, when moving near the soft bottom, it produced a series of transverse ridges and furrows like small ripple marks, with a slight ridge in the middle. 5--^ MARKING?, FOOTPRINTS AND FUCOIDS and sometimes, when the edges of the carapace touched the bottom, with lateral furrows. In this way the animals were able to swim with some ease and rapidity, and on one occasion I observed an individual, confined in a tub of water, raise itself from the bottom and swim around the tub at the surface in search of a way of escape. Lastly, the young Limuli were fond of hiding themselves by burrowing in the sand. They did this by pushing the anterior rounded end of the carapace under the sand, and then vigorously shoveUing out the material from below with their feet, so that they gradually sank under the surface, and the sand flowed in upon them till they were entirely covered. If carefully removed from the hollow they had made, this was found to be ovoid or hoof shaped in form and bilobed, not un- like the curious hollows {Riisophycus Grenvillensis of Billings) which I have supposed to be burrows of Trilobites. I thus found that the common King-crab could produce a considerable variety of tracks and burrows comparable with those which have been named Protichnites, Climactichnites, Bilobites, Cruziana, Rusichnites, etc. ; and that the kind of markings depended partly on the differences of gait in the animal, and partly on the circumstances in which it was placed ; so that different kinds of tracks do not always prove diversity in the animals producing them. The interest of this investigation as applied to Limulus is increased by the fact that this creature is the near ally of Trilobites, Eurypterids and other Crustaceans which were abundant in the earlier geological ages, and whose footprints are probably among the most common we find on the rocks. Lastly, on this part of the subject, it is to be observed that many other marine animals, both crustaceans and worms, make impressions resembling in general character those of Limulus. In addition to those already mentioned, Nathorst and Bureau have shown that various kinds of shrimps and lobster-like Crustaceans, when swimming rapidly by successive strokes ot Ru-siciiNiTES Grenvii.lensis, Uillings— a " IJilobiu Probably the Cast of a Crustacean bunow . MARKINGS, FOOTPRINTS AND FUCOIDS 323 the tail, make double furrows with transverse ridges resembling those of Bilobites, and there are even some moUusks which by the undulations of the foot or the hook-like action of its an- terior part, can make similar trails. A question arises here as to the value of such things as fossils. This depends on the fact that many creatures have left their marks on the rocks when still soft on the sea bottom, of which we have no other indica- tions, and it also depends on our ability to understand the import of these unconscious hieroglyphics. They will certainly be of little use to us so long as we persist in regarding them as vegetable forms, and until we have very carefully studied all kinds of modern markings. ^ Nor does it seem of much use to assign to them specific names. The same trail often changes from one so-called species, or even genus, to another in tracing it along, and the same animal may in different circumstances make very different kinds of tracks. There will eventually, perhaps, arise some general kind of nomenclature for these markings under a separate sub-science of Ichnology or the doc- trine of Footprints. I have said nothing of true Algs or seaweeds, of which there are many fossil species known to us by their forms, and also by the carbonaceous or pyritous matter, or discharge of colour from the matrix, which furnishes evidence of the presence of organic material ; nor of the marks and trails left by sea- weeds and land plants drifting in currents, some of which are very curious and fantastic ; nor of those singular trails referred to the arms of cuttlefishes and the fins of fishes, or to sea jellies and starfishes. These might form n-saterials for a treatise. My object here is merely to indicate the mode of dealing with such things, and the kind of information to be derived from them. When we come to the consideration of actual footprints of ^ Geologists are greatly indebted to Dr. Nathorst of Stockholm for his ]iainstaln\T/mofns), a densely tufted mountain shruK with 448 ALPINE AND ARCTIC PLANTS hard glossy leaves, that look as if constructed to brave ex- tremest hardships. It is found on the mountains of Norway, at the height of 3,550 feet on the Scottish hills, according to Watson, and according to Fuchs, at the height of 7,000 feet in the milder climate of the Venetian Alps. In America it is found in Newfoundland, in Labrador, at 4,000 feet on jMount Albert, Gaspe,' and in the barren grounds from lat. 65" to the extreme Arctic islands. Gray does not mention its occurrence elsewhere in the United States than the summits of the ^^'hite Mountains. A member of the same family of the heaths, the yew-leaved phyllodoce {F. tnxifolia), presents a still more singular distribution. It is found on all the higher mountains of New England and New York, and occurs also on the moun- tains of Scotland and Scandinavia, but its only known station in northern America is, according to Hooker, in Labrador. As many as nine or ten of the Alpine plants of the White Mountains belong to the order of the Heaths {Ericacece). Another example from this order is Rhododendron Lapponiciim, a northern European species, as its name indicates, and scat- tered over all the high mountains of New England and New York, occurring also in Labrador, on the Arctic sea coasts, and the northern part of the Rocky Mountains, and at 4,000 feet . on Mount Albert, Gaspe (Macoun). It would be tedious to refer in detail to more of these plants, hut I must notice two herbaceous species belonging to differ- ent families, but resembling each other in size and habit — the Alpine epilobium {E. alpiniim or ahinefolium), and the Alpine .speedwell ( /vnw/W? alpina). Both are in the United States confined to the highest mountain tops. Both occur as alpine northern plants in Europe, being found on the Alps, on the Scottish Highlands, and in Scandinavia. Both are found in Labrador and on the Reeky Mountains, and the J'eronica ex- ' >'aco'.in. ALPINE AND ARCTIC PLANTS 449 tends as far as Greenland. The Alpine epilobium is one of the few White Mountain plants that have attained the bad emi- nence of being regarded as doubtful species. Gray notes as the typical form, that with obtuse and nearly entire leaves, and as a variety, that with acute and slightly toothed leaves, which some other botanists seem to regard as distinct specifically. Thus we find that this little plant has been induced to assume a suspicious degree of variability ; yet it is strange that both species or varieties are found growing together, as if the little peculiarities in the form of the leaves were matters of indiffer- ence, and not induced by any dire necessities in the struggle for life. Facts of this kind are curious, and not easily explained under the supposition either of specific unity or diversity. For why should this plant vary without necessity ? and why should two species so much alike be created for the same locality ? Perhaps these two species or varieties, wandering from far distant points of origin, have met here fortuitously, while the lines of migration have been cut off by geological changes ; and yet the points of difference are too constant to be removed, even after the reason for them has disappeared. If this could be proved, it would afford a strong reason for believing the existence of a real specific diversity in these plants. I have said nothing of the grasses and sedges of these moun- tains ; but one of them deserves a special notice. It is the Alpine herd's grass {Phleum alpinum), a humble relation of our common herd's grass. This plant not only occurs on the White Mountains, in Arctic America, in the Canadian Moun- tains, from the summit of Mount Albert, in Gaspe, to the mountains of British Columbia, and on the hills of Scotland and Scandinavia, but has been found on the Mexican Cordil- lera and at the Straits of Magellan. The seeds of this giass may perhaps be specially suited for transportation by water, as well as by land. It is observed in Nova Scotia that when the wide flats of mud deposited by the tides of the Bay of Fundy, 450 ALPINE AND ARCTIC PLANTS are dyked in from the sea, they soon become covered with grasses and carices, the seeds of which are supposed to be washed down by streams and mingled with the marine silt ; and fragments of grasses abound in the Post-tertiary clays of the Ottawa. It seems almost ridiculous thus to connect the persistence ot the form of a little plant with the subsidence and elevation of whole continents, and the lapse of enormous periods of time. Yet the Power which preserves unchanged from generation to generation the humblest animal or plant, is the same with that which causes the permanence of the great laws of physical nature, and the continued revolutions of the earth and all its companion spheres. A little leaf, entombed ages on ages ago in the Pleistocene clays of Canada, preserves in all its minutest features the precise type of that of the same species as it now lives, after all the prodigious geological changes that have intervened. An Arctic and Alpine plant that has survived all these changes maintains, in its now isolated and far removed stations, all its specific characters unchanged. The flora of a mountain top is precisely what it must have been when it was an island in the glacial seos. These facts relate not to hard crystalline rocks that remain unaltered from age to age, but to little delicate organisms that have many thousands of times died and been renewed in the lapse of time. They show us that Avhat we call a species represents a decision of the un- changing creative will, and that the group of qualities which constitutes our idea of the species goes on from generation to generation animating new organisms constructed out of difter- ent particles of matter, 'i'lie individual dies, but the species lives, and will live until the Power that has decreed its creation shall have decreed its extinction ; or until, in the slow process of physical change depending on another section of His laws, it shall have been excluded from the jiossibility of existence anywhere en the surface of the rarih, unless we suppose with ALPINE AND ARCTIC PLANTS 45 I modern evolutionists that there is a possibility of these plants so changing their characters that in the lapse of ages they might appear to us to be distinct specific types. The fact, however, that the Arctic species have migrated around the whole Arctic circle, and have advanced southward and retreated to the north, again and again, without changing their constitutions or forms, augurs for" them at least a remarkable fixity as well as con- tinuity. ^Vhile the huge ribs of mother earth that project into moun- tain summits, and the grand and majestic movement of the creative processes by which they have been formed, speak to us of the majesty of Him to whom the sea belongs, and whose hand formed the dry land, the continuance of these little plants preaches the same lessons of humble faith in the Divine pro- mises and laws, which our Lord drew from the lilies of the field. It is suggestive, in connection with the antiquity and migra- tions of these plants, to consider the differences in this respect of some closely allied species of the same genera. Of the blueberries that grow on the White Mountains, one species, Vacciniuni uliginosum, is found in Behring's Straits and very widely in Arctic and boreal America,^ also in northern Europe. V. ccespitosum has a wide northern range in America, but is not European. V. Peniisy/vaiiiciait and V. Caiia- deiise, from their geographical distribution, do not seem to belong to the Arctic flora at all, but to be of more southern origin. The two bearberries {Arctostaphylos uvn-iirsi and alpifia) occur together on the White Hills, and on the Scottish and Scandinavian mountains : but the former is a plant of much wider and more southern distribution in America than the latter. Two of the dwarf willows of the White Mountains [Sa/ix repcns and .S'. herbacea) are European as well as ' Macouii, Catalogue of Canadian plants. 452 ALPINE AND ARCTIC PLANTS American, but S. uva-ursi seems to be confined to America. Rubus trifloriis, the dwarf raspberry, and R. cha??iaemorus, the cloud berry, cUmb about equally high on Mount Washington ; but the former is exclusively American, and ranges pretty far southward, while the latter extends no farther south than the northern coast of Maine, and is distributed all around the Arctic regions of the Old and New ^^'orlds. It is to be observed, however, that the former can thrive on rich and calcareous soils, while the latter loves those that are barren and granitic ; but it is nevertheless probable that R. triflorus belongs to a later and more local flora. Similar reasons would induce the belief that the American dwarf cornel or pigeon- berry {Cor?iiis Canade?isis), whose distribution is solely Ameri- can, and not properly Arctic, is of later origin than the C. Suecica,'^ which occurs in northern America locally, and is ex- tensively distributed in northern Europe. I can but glance at such points as these ; but they raise great questions which are to be worked out, not merely by the patient collection of facts, but by a style of scientific thought very much above those which, on the one hand, escape such prob- lems by the supposition of multiplied centres of creation, or on the other, render their solution worthless by confounding races due to external disturbing causes with species originally distinct. Difficulties of various kinds are easily evaded by either of these extreme views ; but with the fact before him of specific diversity and its manifestly long continuance, on the one hand, and the remarkable migrations of some species on the other, the true naturalist must be content to work out the problerns presented to him with the data afforded by the actual observation of nature, following carefully the threads of guid- ' I have found C. Stwcica growing along witli C. Caiiai/ciisis in shaded and northern exposures on the south side of the St. Lawrence, near Ca- conna and Metis. Its seeds may have been brought over from Labrador by migratory birds. ALPINE AND ARCTIC PLANTS 453 ance thus indicated, not rudely breaking them by too hasty generalizations. But it is time to leave the scientific teachings of our little Alpine friends, and to inquire if they can teach anything to the heart as well as to the head. The mountains themselves, heaving their huge sides to the heavens, speak of forces in comparison with which all human power is nothing ; and we can scarcely look upon them in their majesty without a psalm of praise rising up within us to Him who made the sea, and from whose hands the dry land took its form. As we ascend them, and as our vision ranges more and more widely over the tops of wooded hills, along the courses of streams, over cultivated valleys, and to the shores of the blue sea itself, our mental vision widens too. We think that the great roots of these hills run beneath a whole con- tinent, that their tops look down on the wide St. Lawrence plain, on the beautiful valleys of New England, and on the rice fields of the sunny south. We are reminded of the bro- therhood of man, which overleaps all artificial boundaries, and should cause us to pray that throughout their whole extent these hills may rise amidst a happy, a free, and a God-fearing people. Our Alpine plants have still higher lessons to teach. They are fitting emblems of that little flock, scattered everywhere, yet one in heart, and in all lands having their true citizenship in heaven. They tell us that it is the humble who are nearest God, and they ask why we should doubt the guardian care of the Father who cares for them. They witness, too, of the lowly and hidden ones who may inhabit the barren and lowly spots of earth, yet are special subjects of God's love, as they should be of ours. We may thus read in the Alpine plants truths that beget deeper faith in God, and closer brotherhood with His people. The history of these plants has also a strange significance. 454 ALPINE AND ARCTIC PLANTS It might have been written of them, " Though the dry land be removed out of its place, and the mountains cast into the midst of the sea, yet the Lord will not forsake the work of His hands " ; for this has been literally their history. In this they hold forth an omen of hope to the people of God in that once happy land through which these hills extend, and who now mourn the evil times on which they have fallen. The moun- tain plants may teach them that though the floods of strife should rise even to the tops of the hills, and leave but scattered islets to mark the place of a united land, their rock is sure, and their prayers will prevail.^ The power that has waked the storm is after all their Father's hand. For years a cry has risen high above these hills : the cry of the bondman who has reaped the fields and received no hire. That cry is sure to be heard in heaven, whatever other prayers may go unanswered. An apostle tells us that it enters directly into the ears of the God of Sabaoth, and is potent to call down the day of slaughter on the proud ones of earth. The prayer of the slave has been answered ; and the tempest is abroad, sweeping away his oppressors and their abettors. Yet God rules in all this, and those whom He has chosen will be spared, even like the hardy plants of the hill tops, to look again on a renewed and smiling land, from which many monsters and shapes of dread have for ever passed away. But last of all, the Alpine flowers have a lesson that should come near to all of us individually. They tell us how well natural law is observed, as compared with moral. Obeying with unchanging fidelity the law of their creation, they have meekly borne the cold and storms of thousands of winters, yet have thankfully expanded their bosoms to the returning sun of every summer, and have not once forgot to open their tiny buds, and bring forth flowers and fruit, doing thus their little part to the ' This paper was oiiginally written at tlic time wlien tlie Anicriean Civil War was racinp-. ALPINE AND ARCTIC PLANTS 455 glory of their Maker and ours. How would the moral wastes of earth rejoice and be glad, did the sunshine of God's daily favours evoke a similar response from every human heart ! References: — Paper on Destruction and Renewal of Forests in North America, Edinburgh PhilosopJiical Journal, 1847-8. Alpine and Arctic Plants, Canadian Naturalist, 1862. "The Geological History of Plants," International Scientific Series, 2nd edition, 1891. "The Pleistocene Flora of Canada," Dawson and Penhallow, BuUetin, American Geological Society, 1890. Papers on Pleistocene Climate of Canada, Canxdian Naturalist, 1S57 to 1890. EARLY MAN. DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF THE LATE SIR DANIEL WILSON, LL.D., F.R.S.E., a dear and valued priend, and one of the most eminent and judicious students of Pre-historic Man both in Europe and America. Summary of the Story of Early Man — Classification OF Tertiary Time — Probabilities as to the Intro- duction OF Man — The Anthropic Age as distin- guished from the Pleistocene — Its Division into Palanthropic and Neanthropic — Sketches of Palan- thropic Man and his Immediate Successors Four Pre-historic Skulls, (p. 472.) Outer outline, Cromagno7t ; second, Engis ; third, Camtsfadt ; fourth, Canadian Hochelagan on smaller scale. CHAPTER XVII. EARLY MAN. THE science of the earth has its culmination and terminus in man ; and at this, the most advanced of our salient points, as we look back on the long process of the development of the earth, we may well ask. Was the end worthy of the means ? We may well have doubts as to an affirmative answer if we do not consider that the means were perfect, each in its own time, and that man, the final link in the chain of life, is that which alone takes hold of the unseen and eternal. He alone can comprehend the great plan, and appre- ciate its reason and design. Without his agency in this respect nature would have been a riddle without any solution — a column without a capital, a tree without fruit. Besides this, even science may be able to perceive that man may be not merely the legatee of all the ages that lie behind, but the heir of the eternity that lies before, the only earthly being that has implanted in him the germ and instinct of immortality. Whatever view we may take of these questions, it is of inter- est to us to know, if possible, how and when this chief corner stone was placed upon the edifice of nature, and what are the ])recise relations of man to the later geological ages, as well as to the present order of nature, of which he is at once a part, and its ruler and head. Let us put this first in the form of a narrative based on geological facts only, and then consider some of its details and relations to history. The Glacial age had passed away. The lower land, in great part a bare expanse of mud, sand, and gravel, had risen from s, E. «' 33 46o EARLY MAN the icy ocean in which it had been submerged, and most of the mountain tops had lost their covering of perennial snow and ice. 'J'he climate was ameliorated, and the sun again shone warmly on the desolate earth. Gradually the new land became overspread with a rich vegetation, and was occupied by many large animals. There were species of elephant, rhinoceros, hippopotamus, horse, bison, ox and deer, multiplying till the plains and river valleys were filled with their herds, in spite of the fact that they were followed by formidable carnivorous beasts fitted to prey on them. At this time, somewhere in the warm temperate zone, in an oasis or island of fertility, appeared a new thing on the earth, a man and woman walking erect in the forest glades, bathing in the waters, gathering and tasting every edible fruit, watching with curious and inquiring eyes the various animals around them, and giving them names which might eventually serve not merely to designate their kinds, but to express actions and emotions as well. When, where, and how did this new departure, fraught with so many possibilities, occur — introducing as it did the dexterous fingers and inventive mind of Man upon the scene ? The last of these, questions science is still unable to answer, and though we may frame many hypotheses, they all remain destitute of certain proof in so iar as natural science is concerned. A\"e can here only fall back on the old traditional and historical monuments of our race, and believe that man, the child of God, and with God-like intellect, will, and consciousness, was placed by his Maker in an Edenic region, and commissioned to multiply and replenish the earth. The when and where of his introduction, and his early history when introduced, are more open to scientific investigation. That man was originally frugivorous, his whole structure testifies. That he originated in some favourable climate and fertile land is equally certain, and that his surroundings must liave been of such a nature as to give him immunity from the EARLY MAN 46 1 attacks of formidable beasts of prey, also goes without saying. These are all necessary conditions of the successful introduc- tion of such a creature as man, and theories which suppose him to have originated in a cold climate, to struggle at once with the difficulties and dangers of such a position, are, from a scientific point of view, incredible. But man was introduced into a wide and varied world, more wide and varied than that possessed by his modern descend- ants. The earliest men that we certainly know inhabited out continents in the second Continental age of the Kainozoic Period, when, as we know from ample geological evidence, the land of the northern hemisphere was much more extensive than at present, with a mild climate, and a rich flora and fauna. If he was ambitious to leave the oasis of his origin the way was open to him, but at the expense of becoming a toiler, an inventor, and a feeder on animal food, more especially when he should penetrate into the colder climates. The details of all this, as they actually occurred, are not within the range of scien- tific investigation, for these early men must have left few, if any, monuments ; but we can imagine some of them. Man's hands were capable of other uses than the mere gathering of fruit. His mind was not an instinctive machine, like that of lower animals, but an imaginative and inventive intellect, capable of adapting objects to new uses peculiar to himself. A fallen branch would enable him to obtain the fruits that hung higher than his hands could reach, a pebble would enable him to break a nut too hard for his teeth. He could easily weave a few twigs into a rough basket to carry the fruit he had gathered to the cave or shelter, or spreading tree, or rough hut that served him for a home ; and when he had found courage to snatch a brand from some tree, ignited by lightning, or by the friction of dry branches, and to kindle a fire for himself, he had fairly entered on that path of invention and discovery which has enabled him to achieve so many conquests over nature. 462 EARLY MAN Our imagination may carry us yet a little farther with reference to his fortunes. If he needed any weapon to repel aggressive enemies, a stick or club would serve his purpose, or perhaps a stone thrown from his hand,.' Soon, however, he might learn from the pain caused by the sharp flints that lay in his path the cutting power of an edge, and, armed with a flint chip held in the hand, or fitted into a piece of wood, he would become an artificer of many things useful and pleasing. As he wan- dered into more severe climates, where vegetable food could not be obtained throughout the year, and as he observed the habits of beasts and birds of prey, he would learn to be a hunter and a fisherman, and to cook animal food ; and with this would come new habits, wants and materials, as well as a more active and energetic mode of life. He would also have to make new weapons and implements, axes, darts, harpoons, and scrapers for skins, and bodkins or needles to make skin garments. He would use chipped flint where this could be procured, and failing this, splintered and rubbed slate, and for some uses, bone and antler. Much ingenuity would be used in shaping these materials, and in the working of bone, antler and wood, ornament would begin to be studied. In the mean- time the hunter, though his weapons improved, would become a ruder and more migratory man, and in anger, or in the desire to gain some coveted object, might begin to use his weapons against his brother man. In some more favoured localities, however, he might attain to a more settled life ; and he, or more likely the woman his helpmeet, might contrive to tame some species of animals, and to begin some culture of the soil. It was probably in this early time that metals first attracted the attention of men. The ages of stone, bronze, and iron believed in by some arch^ologists, are more or less mythical to the geologist, who knows that these things depend more on locality and on natural products than on stages of culture. The analogy of America teaches us that the use of EARLY MAN 463 different metals may be contemporaneous, provided that they can be obtained in a native state. At the time of the dis- covery of America the Esquimaux were using native iron, which, though rare in most parts of the world, is not uncom- mon in some rocks of Greenland. The people of the region of the great lakes, and of the valleys of the Mississippi and Ohio, were using native copper from Lake Superior for similar purposes. Gold was apparendy the only metal among the natives of Central America. The people of Peru had invented bronze, or had brought the knowledge of it with them from beyond the sea. Thus the Peruvians were in the bronze age, the Mexicans and Mound builders in the copper age, and the Esquimaux in the iron age, while at the same time the greater part of the aboriginal tribes were at one and the same time in the ages of chipped and polished stone and in these ages what have been called paleolithic and neolothic weapons were contemporaneous, the former being most usually unfinished examples of the latter, or extemporized tools roughly made in emergencies.! How long this had lasted, or how long it would have continued, had not Europeans introduced from abroad an iron age, we do not know. It was probably the same in other parts of the world, in pre-historic times. In any case, the dis- covery of native metals must have occurred very early. ISIen searching in the beds of streams for suitable pebbles to form hammers and other implements, would find nuggets of gold and copper, and the properties of these, so different from those of other pebbles, would at once attract attention, and lead to useful applications. Native iron is of rarer occurrence, but in certain localities would also be found.'- It must have been 1 "Fossil Men," by llie Aullior. \V. II. Holmes, " Americin Anthro- pologist," 1890. ^ The rarity of native iron, whether meteoric or telluric, and its rapid decay by rusting, suft'iciently account for its absence in deposits where im- plements of stone and bone have been preserved. 464 EARLY MAN experiments on these ores, which resemble the native metals in colour, lustre and weight, that led to the first attempts at smelt- ing metals, and these must have occurred at a very early period. Yet for ages the metals must have been extremely scarce, and we know that in comparatively modern times civil- ized nations like the Egyptians were using flint flakes after they had domesticated many animals, had become skilful agricultu- rists and artisans, and had executed great architectural works. Probably all these ends had been to some extent, and in some localities, attained in the earliest human period, when man was contemporary with many large animals now extinct, l>ut a serious change was to occur in human prospects, 'inhere is the best geological evidence that in the northern hemisphere the mild climate of the earlier Post-glacial period relapsed into comparative coldness, though not so extreme as that of the preceding Glacial age. Hill tops, long denuded of the snow and ice of the Glacial period, were again covered, and cold winters sealed up the lakes and rivers, and covered the ground with wintry snows of long continuance, and with this came a cliange in animal lite and in human habits. The old southern elephant {E. antiqiiiis), the southern rhinoceros {E. leptorhinns), and the river hippopotamus (//. niajo/-), which had been contemporaries, in Europe at least, of primitive man, retired from the advancing cold, and ultimately perished, while their places were taken by the hairy mammoth {E. /'/i/ziii^i'/iii/s), the woolly rhinoceros (A^ iichorJiimis), the rein- deer, and even the musk ox. Now began a fierce struggle for existence in the more northern districts inhabited by man — a struggle in which only the hardier and ruder races could sur- vive, except, perhaps, in some of the more genial portions of the warm temperate zone. Men had to become almost wholly carnivorous, and had to contend with powerful and fierce animals. Tribe contended with tribe for the possession of the most productive and sheltered habitats. Thus the struggle EARLY MAN 46; with nature became aggravated by that between man and man. Violence disturbed the progress of civih'zation, and favoured the increase and power of the rudest tribes, while the more deli- cately organized and finer types of humanity, if they continued to exist in some favoured spots, were in constant danger of being exterminated by their fiercer and stronger contemporaries. In mercy to humanity, this state of things was terminated by a great physical revolution, the last great subsidence of the continents — that Post-glacial flood, which must have swept away the greater part of men, and many species of great beasts, and left only a few survivors to re-people the world, just as the mammoth and other gigantic animals had to give place to smaller and feebler creatures. In these vicissitudes it seemed determined, with reference to man, that the more gigantic and formidable races should perish, and that one of the finer types should survive to re-people the world. The age of which we have been writing the history, is that which has been fitly named the Anthropic, in that earlier part of it preceding the great diluvial catastrophe, which has fixed itself in all the earlier traditions of men, and which separates what may be called the Palanthropic or Antediluvian age from the Neanthroj)ic or Postdiluvian. Independently altogether of human history, these are two geological ages distinguished by different physical conditions and different species of animals ; and the time has undoubtedly come when all the speculations of archaeologists respecting early man must be regulated by these great geological facts, which are stamped upon those later deposits of the crust of the earth, which have been laid down since man was its inhabitant. If they have only recently as- sumed their proper place in the geological chronology, this is due to the great difficulty in the case of the more recent deposits in establishing their actual succession and relations to each other. These difficulties have, however, been overcome, and new facts are constantly being obtained to render our 466 EARLY MAN knowledge more definite. Lest, however, the preceding sketch of the Palanthropic age — that in which gigantic men were con- temporaries of a gigantic fauna now extinct — should be re- garded as altogether fanciful, we may proceed to consider the geological facts and classification as actually ascertained. The Tertiary or Kainozoic period, the last of the four great " times " into which the earth's geological history is usually divided, and that to which man and the mammalia belong, was ingeniously subdivided by Lyell, on the ground of per- centages of marine shells and other invertebrates of the sea. According to this method, which with some modification in details is still accepted, the Eocene, or dawn of the recent, includes those formations in which the percentage of modern species of marine animals does not exceed 3^, all the other species found being extinct. The Miocene (less recent) in- cludes formations in which the percentage of living species does not exceed 35, and the Pliocene (more recent) contains formations having more than 35 per cent, of recent species. To these three may be added the Pleistocene, in which the great majority of the species are recent, and the Modern or Anthropic, in which we are still living. Dawkins and (iaudry give us a division substantially the same with Lyell's, except that they prefer to take the evidence of the higher animals instead of the marine shells. The Eocene thus includes those formations in which there are remains of mammals or ordinary land quadrupeds, but none of these belong to recent species or genera, though they may be included in the same families and orders with the recent mammals. This is a most im- portant fact, as we shall see, and the only exception to it is that Gaudry and others hold that a few living genera, as those of the dog, civet, and marten, are actually found in the later Eocene. The Miocene, on the same mammalian evidence, will include formations in which there are living genera of mammals, but no species which survive to the present time. EARLY MAN 467 The Pliocene and Pleistocene show living species, though in the former these are very few and exceptional, while in the latter they become the majority. With regard to the geological antiquity of man, no geologist expects to find any human remains in beds older than the Tertiary, because in the older periods the conditions of the world do not seem to have been suitable to man, and because in these periods no animals nearly akin to man are known. On entering into the Eocene Tertiary we fail in like manner to find any human remains ; and we do not expect to find any, because no living species and scarcely any living genera of mammals are known in the Eocene ; nor do we find in it remains of any of the animals, as the anthropoid apes, for in- stance, most nearly allied to man. In the Miocene the case is somewhat different. Here we have living genera at least, and we have large species of apes ; but no remains of man have been discovered, if we except some splinters of flint found in beds of this age at Thenay, in France, and some notched bones. Supposing these objects to have been chipped or notched by animals, which is by no means certain in the case of the flints, the question remains, Was this done by man ? Gaudry and Dawkins prefer to suppose that the artificer was one of the anthropoid apes of the period. It is true that no apes are known to do such work now ; but then other animals, as beavers and birds, are artificers, and some extinct animals were of higher powers than their modern representatives. But if there were Miocene apes which chipped flints and cut bones, this would, either on the hypothesis of evolution or that of creation by law, render the occurrence of man still less likely than if there were no such apes. The scratched and notched bones, on the other hand, indicate merely the gnawing of sharks or other carnivorous animals. For these reasons neither Daw- kins nor Gaudry, nor indeed any geologists of authority in the Tertiary fauna, believe in Miocene man. 468 EARLY MAN In the Pliocene, though the facies of the mammahan fauna of Europe becomes more modern, and a few modern species occur, the chmate becomes colder, and in consequence the apes disappear, so that the chances of finding fossil men are lessened rather than increased in so far as the temperate regions are concerned. In Italy, however, Capellini has de- scribed a skull, an implement, and a notched bone supposed to have come from Pliocene beds. To this it may be objected that the skull — which I examined in 1883 in the museum at Florence — and the implement are of recent type, and probably mixed with the Pliocene stuff by some slip of the ground. As the writer has elsewhere pointed out,^ similar and apparently fatal objections apply to the skull and implements alleged to have been found in Pliocene gravels in California. Dawkins further informs us that in the Italian Pliocene beds supposed to hold remains of man, of twenty-one mammalia whose bones occur, all are extinct species, except possibly one, a hippo- ])otamus. This, of course, renders very unlikely in a geological point of view the occurrence of human remains in these beds. In the Pleistocene deposits of Europe — and this applies also to America — we for the first time find a predominance of recent species of land animals. Here, therefore, we may look with some hope for remains of man and his works, and here, in the later Pleistocene, or the early Modern, they are actually found. When we speak, however, of Pleistocene man, there arise some questions as to the classification of the deposits, which it seems to the writer Dawkins and other Ikitish geolo- gists have not answered in accordance with geological facts, and a misunderstanding as to which may lead to serious error. They have extended the term Pleistocene over that Post-glacial period in which we find remains of man, and thus have split the " Anthropic " period into two ; and they proceed to divide the latter part of it into the Pre-historic and Historic periods, ' " l\)ssil Men,"" iSSo. EARLY MAN ■ 469 whereas the name Pleistocene should not be extended to the Post-glacial age. The close of the Glacial period, introducing great physical and climatal changes, some new species of mammalia and man himself, should be regarded as the end of the Pleistocene, and the introduction of what some French geologists have called the Aiithropic period, which I have else- where divided into Palanthropic, corresponding to the so-called Palnsolithic age, and Neanthropic, corresponding to the later stone and metal ages.^ These may be termed respectively the earlier and later stages of the Modern period as distinguished from the Pleistocene Tertiary. In point of logical arrangement, and especially of geological classification, the division into historic and pre-historic periods is decidedly objectionable. Even in Europe the historic age of the south is altogether a different thing from that of the north, and to speak of the pre-historic period in Greece and in Britain or Norway as indicating the same portion of time is altogether illusory. Hence a large portion of the discussion of this subject has to be properly called " the overlap of history." Further, the mere accident of the presence or absence of his- torical documents cannot constitute a geological period com- parable with such periods as the Pleistocene and Pliocene, and the assumption of such a criterion of time merely confuses our ideas. On the one hand, while the whole Tertiary or Kaino- zoic, up to the present day, is one great geological period, characterized by a continuous though gradually changing fauna and series of physical conditions, and there is consequently no good basis for setting apart, as some geologists do, a Quaternary as distinct from the Tertiary period ; on the other hand, there is a distinct physical break between the Pliocene and the Modern in the great Glacial age. This, in its Arctic climate and enormous submergence of the land, though it did not exterminate the fauna of the northern hemisphere, * " Modern Science in Bible Lands." 470 EARLY MAN greatly reduced it, and at the close of this age some new forms came in. For this reason the division between the Pleistocene and Anthropic ages should be made at the beginning of the Post-glacial age. The natural division would thus be : — - I. Pleistocene, including — (a) Early Pleistocene, or first continental period. Land very extensive, moderate climate. This passes into the pre- ceding Pliocene. {b) Later F/eistocene, or glacial, including Dawkins' " Mid Pleistocene." In this there was a great prevalence of cold and glacial conditions, and a great submergence of the northern land. II. Anthropic, or period of man and modern mammals, including — {a) Palanthropic, Post-glacial, or second continental period, in which the land was again very extensive, and Paleocosmic man was contemporary with some great mammals, as the mammoth, now extinct, and the area of land in the northern hemisphere was greater than at present. This includes a later cold period, not equal in intensity to that of the Glacial period proper, and was terminated by a great and very general subsi- dence, accompanied by the disappearance of Paleocosmic man and some large mammalia, and which may be identical with the historical deluge. (/>) N^eanthropic or Recent, when the continents attained their present levels, existing races of men colonized I^uropc, and living species of mammals. This includes botli the Pre- historic and Historic periods. On geological grounds tlie above should clearly be our arrangement, though of course there need be no objection to such other subdivisions as historians and antiquarians may find desirable for their pur[)oscs. On this classification the earliest certain indications of the presence of man in Europe, Asia, or America, so far as yet knoivn, belong to the Modern or Anthropic EARLY MAN 47 I period alone. That man may have existed previously no one need deny, but no one can at present positively affirm on any ground of actual fact. It may be necessary here to explain the contentions often made that in Britain and Western Europe man belongs to an interglacial period. When with Dr. James Geikie, the great Scottish glacialist, we hold that there were several interglacial periods, the Glacial age may be extended by including the warm period of the Palanthropic, and the cold at its termination, as one of the interglacial and Glacial periods. In this way, as a matter of classification, man appears in the latest Interglacial periods. This, however, as above stated, I regard as an error in arrangement ; but it makes no practical difference as to the facts. Inasmuch, however, as the human remains of the Post-glacial epoch are those of fully developed men of high type, it may be said, and has often been said, that man in sorhe lower stage of development 7nust have existed at a far earlier period. That is, he must, if certain theories as to his evolution from lower animals are to be sustained. This, however, is not a mode of reasoning in accordance with the methods of science. When facts fail to sustain certain theories we are usually in the habit of saying " so much the worse for the theories," not " so much the worse for the facts," or at least we claim the right to hold our judgment in suspense till some confirmatory facts are forth- coming. We have now to inquire as to the actual nature of the indi- cations of man in Europe and Western Asia at the close of the Glacial or Pleistocene period. These are principally such of his tools or weapons as could escape decay when embedded in river gravels, or in the earth and stalagmite o( caverns or rock shelters, or buried with his bones in caves of sepulture. \'ery valuable accessory fossils are the broken bones of the animals he has used as food. Most valuable, and rarest of all, are well- preserved human skulls and skeletons. Some doubt may attach 472 EARLY MAN to mere flint flakes, in tlie absence of other remains ; but the other indications above referred to are indisputable, and when proper precautions are taken to notice the succession of beds, and to eUminate the effects of any later disturbance of the de- posits, human fossils become as instructive and indisputable as any others. When the whole of the facts thus available are put together, we find that the earliest men of whom we have osseous remains, and who, undoubtedly, inhabited Europe and Western Asia in the second continental period, before the establishment of the present geography, and before the disappearance of the mam- moth and its companions, were of two races or subraces, agree- ing in certain respects, differing in others. Both have long or dolichocephalic heads, and seem to have been men of great strength and muscular energy, with somewhat coarse counte- nances of Mongolian type, and they seem to have been of roving habits, living as hunters and fishermen in a semi-barbar- ous condition, but showing some artistic skill and taste in their carvings on bone and other ornaments. -The earliest of the two races locally, though, on the whole, they were contemporaneous, is that known as the Cannstadt or Neanderthal people, who are characterized by a low forehead, with beetling brows, massive limb bones and moderate stature. So far as known they were the ruder and less artistic of the two races. The other, the Engis or Cromagnon race, was of higher type, with well-formed and capacious skull, and a countenance which, if somewhat broad, with high cheek bones, eyes length- ened laterally, and heavy lower jaw, must have been of some- what grand and impressive features. These men are of great stature, some examples being seven feet in height, and with massive bones, having strong muscular impressions. The Engis skull found in a cave in Belgium, with bones of the mammoth, the skeletons of the Cromagnon cave in the valley of the Vezere, in France, and those of the caves of Mentonc, in Italy, repre- EARLY MAN 473 sent this race. Doubts, it is true, have been entertained as to whether the last mentioned race is really palanthropic ; but the latest facts as to their mode of occurrence and associations seem to render this certain. These men were certainly contem- poraneous with the mammoth, and they disappeared in the cataclysm which closed the earlier anthropic period. Attempts have, however, been made to separate them into groups ac- cording to age, within this period ; ^ and there can be no doubt that both in France and England the lower and older strata of gravels and caves yield ruder and less perfect implements than the higher. Independently, however, of the fact that the very earliest men may have been peaceful gatherers of fruit, and not hunters or warriors, having need of lethal weapons, such facts may rather testify to local improvement in the condition of certain tribes than to any change of race. Such local im- provement would be very likely to occur wherever a new locality was taken possession of by a small and wandering tribe, which, in process of time, might increase in numbers and in wealth, as well as in means of intercourse with other tribes. A similar succession would occur when caves, used at first as temporary places of rendezvous by savage tribes, became afterwards places of residence, or were acquired by conquest on the part of tribes a little more advanced, in the manner in which such changes are constantly taking place in rude communities. Yet on facts of this nature have been built extensive generali- zations as to a race of river-drift men, in a low and savage con- dition, replaced, after the lapse of ages, by a people somewhat more advanced in the arts, and specially addicted to a cavern life ; and this conclusion is extended to Europe and Asia, so that in every case where rude flint implements exist in river gravels, evidence is supposed to be found of the earlier of these races. But no physical break separates the two periods ; the ' Morlillet, " Pic-hisloric Men." 474 EARLY MAN fauna remained the same ; the skulls, so far as known, present little difference ; and even in works of art the distinction is in- validated by grave exceptions, which are intensified by the fact, which the writer has elsewhere illustrated, that in the case of the same people their residences in caves, etc., and their places of burial are likely to contain very different objects from those which they leave in river gravels. It is admitted that the whole of these Palaeocosmic men are racially distinct from modern men, though most nearly allied in physical characters to some of the Mongoloid races of the northern regions. Some of their characters also appear in the native races of America, and occasional cases occur, when even the characters of the Cannstadt skull reappear in modern times. The skull of the great Scottish king Robert Bruce was of this type ; and his indomitable energy and governing power may have been connected with this fact. Attempts have even been made ^ to show an intimate connection between the cave men and the Esquimaux of Greenland and Arctic America, but, as Wilson has well shown, ^ this is not borne out by their cranial' characters, and the resemblances, such as they are, in arts and implements, are common to the Esquimaux and many other American tribes. In many respects, however, the arts and mode of life, as well as some of the physical characters of the Palaeocosmic men of Europe were near akin to those of the ruder native races of America. Perhaps one of the most curious examples of this is the cave at Sorde, in the western Pyrenees. On the floor of this cave lay a human skeleton, covered with fallen blocks of stone. With it were found forty canine teeth of the bear, and three of the lion, perforated for suspension, and several of these teeth are skilfully engraved with figures of animals, one bearing the engraved figure of an embroidered glove. This necklace, no * Dawkins, " Early Man in Britain." * Address to Anthropological section of the American Association, 1SS2. EARLY MAN 475 doubt just such a trophy of the chase as would now be worn by a red Indian hunter, though more elaborate, must have belonged to the owner of the skull, who would appear to have perished by a fall of rock, or to have had his body covered after death with stones. In the deposit near and under these remains were flint flakes. Above the skull were several feet of refuse, stones, and bones of the horse, reindeer, etc., and " Paleolithic" flint implements, and above all were placed the remains of thirty skulls and skeletons with beautifully chipped flint imple- ments, some of them as fine as any of later age. After the burial of these the cave seems to have been finally closed with large stones. The French explorers of this cave refer the lower and upper skulls to the same race, that of Cromagnon ; but others consider the upper remains as "Neolithic," though there is no reason why a man who possessed a necklace of beautifully carved teeth should not have belonged to a tribe which used well-made stone implements, or why the weapons buried with the dead should have been no better than the chips and flakes left by the same people in their rubbish heaps. In any case the interment — and this applies also to the Mentone caves — ■ recalls the habits of American aborigines. In some of these cases we have even deposits of red oxide of iron, representing the war paint of the ancient hunter. Widely different opinions have been held by archaeologists as to the connection of the Palanthropic and Neanthropic ages. It suits the present evolutionist and exaggerated unlformitarian- ism of our day to take for granted that the two are continuous, and pass into each other. But there are stubborn facts against this conclusion. Let us take, for example, the area represented by the British Islands and the neighbouring continent. In the earlier period Britain was a part of the mainland, and was occu- pied by the mammoth, the woolly rhinoceros, and other animals, now locally or wholly extinct. The human inhabit- ants were of a large-bodied and coarse race not now found S. E. 34 476 EARLY MAN anywhere. In the later period all this is changed. Britain has become an island. Its gigantic Post-glacial fauna has dis- appeared. Its human inhabitants are now small in stature and delicate in feature, and represented to this day by parts of the population of the south of Wales and Ireland. They buried their dead in the peculiar cemeteries known as long barrows, and their implements and weapons are of a new type, previously unknown. All this shows a great interval of physical and organic mutation. In connection with this we have the high- level gravel and rubble, which Prestwich has shown to belong to this stage, and which proves a subsidence even greater than that to be inferred from the present diminution of the land area. Knowing as we do that the close of the Glacial period was not more than 8,000 years ago, and deducting from this the probable duration of the Palanthropic age on the one hand, and that of modern history on the other, we must admit that the. interval left for the great physical andfaunal changes above referred to is too small to permit them to have occurred as the re;sult of slow and gradual operations. Considerations of this kind have indeed some of the best authorities on the subject, as Cartailhac, Forel, and de IMortillet, to hold that there is "an immense space, a great gap, during which the fauna was renewed, and after which a new race of men suddenly made its appearance, and polished stone instead of chipping it, and sur- rounded themselves with domestic animals."^ There is thus, in the geological history of man an interval of physical and organic change, corresponding to that traditional and historical deluge which has left its memory with all the more ancient nations. Thus our men of the Palanthropic, Post-glacial or Mammoth age are the same we have been accustomed to call Antediluvians, and their immediate successors are identical with the Basques ^ Quatrefages, "The Human Species." The interval should not, how- ever, be placed after the reindeer period, as this animal occurs in both ages. EARLY MAN 477 and ancient Iberians, a non-Aryan or Turanian people who once possessed nearly the whole of Europe, and included the rude Ugrians and Laps of the north, the civilized Etruscans of the south, and the Iberians of the west, with allied tribes occu- pying the British Islands. This race, scattered and overthrown before the dawn of authentic history in Europe by the Celts and other intrusive peoples, was unquestionably that which succeeded the now extinct Palsocosmic race, and constituted the men of the so-called " Neolithic period," which thus con- nects itself with the modern history of Europe, from which it is not separated by any physical catastrophe like that which divides the older men of the mammoth age and the widely spread continents of the Post-glacial period from our modern days. This identification of the Neolithic men with the Iberians, which the writer has also insisted on, Dawkins de- serves credit for fully elucidating, and he might have carried it farther, to the identification of these same Iberians with the Berbers, theGuanches of the Canary Islands, and the Caribbean and other tribes of eastern and central America. On these hitherto dark subjects light is now rapidly breaking, and we may hope that much of the present obscurity will soon be cleared away. Supposing, then, that we may apply the term Anthropic to that portion of the Kainozoic period which intervenes between the close of the Glacial age and the present time, and that we admit the division of this into two portions, the earlier, called the Palanthropic, and the later, which still continues, the Nean- thropic, it will follow that one great physical and organic break separates the Palanthropic age from the preceding Glacial, and a second similar break separates the two divisions of the An- thropic from each other. This being settled, if we allow say 2,500 years from the Glacial age for the first peopling of the world and the Palanthropic age, and if we consider the modern history of the European region and the adjoining parts of Asia 47^ EARLY MAN and Africa to go back for 5,000 years, there will remain a space of from 500 to 1,000 years for the destruction of the Palaeo- cosmic men and the re-peopling of the old continent by such survivors as founded the Neocosmic peoples. These later peoples, though distinct racially from their predecessors, may represent a race contemporary with them in some regions in which it was possible to survive the great cataclysm, so that we do not need to ask for time to develop such new race.^ We cannot but feel some regret that the grand old Pala^o- cosmic race was destined to be swept away by the flood, but it was no doubt better for the world that it should be replaced by a more refined if feebler race. When we see how this has, in some of its forms, reverted to the old type, and emulated, if not surpassed it in filling the earth with violence, we may, perhaps, congratulate ourselves on the extinction of the giant races of the olden time. References : — " Fossil Men," London, 18S0. The Antiquity of Man, Princeton Kevieiv. " Pre-liistoric ALin in Egypt and the Lebanon," Trans. Vict. Institute, 1884. Pre-historic Times in Egypt and Palestine, North American Kivinv^ June and July, 1S92. ' For details of the physical characters of the older races of men I may refer to the works mentioned below, or to the writings of Dawkins anil Quatrefages. MAN IN NATURE. DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF MY DEAR FRIEND DR. P. P. CARPENTER, at once an eminent naturalist and Educator — equally a lover of nature, OF HIS Fellow Men and of God, What is Nature — Man a part of Nature — Distinction BETWEEN Man and other Animals — Man as an Imitator of Nature — Man as at War with Nature — Man in Harmony with Nature Carving ok the rALANTiiRoru- Agf. — Cave of Mas d'Azil, France ; after Carlailliac. Heads of the wild horse, carved on antler of the reindeer, and showing accurate imitation of nature, with ideal and adaptive art on the part of the antediluvian sculptor. (See p. 490.) CHAPTER XVIIl. MAN IN NA TURE. FF-W words are used among us more loosely than "nature." Sometimes it stands for the material universe as a whole. Sometimes it is personified as a sort of goddess, working her own sweet will with material things. Sometimes it expresses the forces which act on matter, and again it stands for material things themselves. It is spoken of as subject to law, but just as often natural law is referred to in terms which imply that nature itself is the lawgiver. It is supposed to be opposed to the equally vague term "supernatural" ; but this term is used not merely to denote things above and beyond nature, if there are such, but certain opinions held respecting natural things. On the other hand, the natural is contrasted with the artificial, though this is always the outcome of natural powers, and is certainly not supernatural. Again, it is applied to the inherent properties of beings for which we are unable to account, and which we are content to say constitute their nature. We can- not look into the works of any of the more speculative writers of the day without meeting with all these uses of the word, and have to be constantly on our guard lest by a change of its meaning we shall be led to assent to some proposition alto- gether unfounded. For illustrations of this convenient though dangerous ambi- guity, I may turn at random to almost any page in Darwin's celebrated work on the "Origin of Species." In the beginning of Chapter III. he speaks of animals " in a state of nature '' 482 MAN IN NATURE that is, not in a domesticated or artificial condition, so that here nature is opposed to the devices of man. Then he speaks of species as "arising in nature,'' that is, spontaneously produced in the midst of certain external conditions or environment out- side of the organic world. A little farther on he speaks of use- ful varieties as given to man by " the hand of Nature," which here becomes an imaginary person ; and it is worthy of notice that in this place the printer or proof-reader has given the word an initial capital, as if a proper name. In the next section he speaks of the " works of Nature " as superior to those of art. Here the word is not only opposed to the artificial, but seems to imply some power above material things and comparable with or excelling the contriving intelligence of man. I do not mean by these examples to imply that Darwin is in this respect more inaccurate than other writers. On the contrary, he is greatly surpassed by many of his contemporaries in the varied and fixntastic uses of this versatile word. An illustration which occurs to me here, as at once amusing and instructive, is an expression used by Romanes, one of the cleverest of the fol- lowers of the great evolutionist, and which appears to him to give a satisfactory explanation of the mystery of elevation in nature. He says, " Nature selects the best individuals out of each generation to live." Here nature must be an intelligent agent, or the statement is simply nonsensical. The same alter- native applies to much of the use of the favourite term " natural selection." In short, those who use such modes of expression would be more consistent if they were at once to come back to the definition of Seneca, that nature is " a certain divine purpose manifested in the world." The derivation of the word gives us the idea of something produced or becoming, and it is curious that the Greek p/iysis, though etymologically distinct, conveys the same meaning — a coincidence which may perhaps lead us to a safe and service- able definition. Nature, rightly understood, is, in short, an MAN IN NATURE 483 orderly system of things in time and space, and this not invari- able, but in a state of constant movement and progress, whereby it is always becoming something different from what it was. Now man is placed in the midst of this orderly, law-regulated yet ever progressive system, and is himself a part of it ; and if we can understand his real relations to its other parts, we shall have made some approximation to a true philosophy. The subject has been often discussed, but is perhaps not yet quite exhausted.^ Regarding man as a part of nature, we must hold to his entering into the grand unity of the natural system, and must not set up imaginary antagonisms between man and nature as if he were outside of it. An instance of this appears in Tyn- dall's celebrated Belfast address, where he says, in explanation of the errors of certain of the older philosophers, that "the ex- periences which formed the weft and woof of their theories were chosen not from the study of nature, but from that which lay much nearer to them — the observation of Man ": a statement this which would make man a supernatural, or at least a preter- natural being. Again, it does not follow, because man is a part of nature, that he must be precisely on a level with its other parts. There are in nature many planes of existence, and man is no doubt on one of its higher planes, and possesses distin- guishing powers and properties of his own. Nature, like a per- fect organism, is not all eye or all hand, but includes various organs, and so far as we see it in our planet, man is its head, though wc can easily conceive that there may be higher beings in other parts of the universe beyond our ken. The view which we may take of man's position relatively to the beings which are nearest to him, namely, the lower animals, will depend on our point of sight— whether that of mere anatomy ' " Man's Place ill Nature, " /'/■///tr/t;;/ y^t^vcTc, November, 1S78. "The Unity of Nature," by tlie Duke of Argyll, 1SS4, may be considered as sug- gestive of the thoughts of this chapter. 484 MAN IX NATURE and physiolog}', or that of psychology and pneumatology as well. This distinction is the more important, since, under the somewhat delusive term ''l)iology," it has been customary to mix up all these considerations, while, on the other hand, those anatomists who regard all the functions of organic beings as merely mechanical and physical, do not scruple to employ this term biology for their science, though on their hypothesis there can be no such thing as life, and consequently the use of the word by them must be either superstitious or hypocritical. Anatomically considered, man is an animal of the class MammaUa. In that class, notwithstanding the heroic efforts of some modern detractors from his dignity to place him with the monkeys in the order Primates, he undoubtedly belongs to a distinct order. I have elsewhere argued that, if he were an ex- tinct animal, the study of the bones of his hand, or of his head, would suffice to convince any competent palaeontologist that he represents a distinct order, as far apart from the highest apes as they are from the carnivora. That he belongs to a distinct family no anatomist denies, and the same unanimity of course obtains as to his generic and specific distinctness. On the other hand, no zoological systematist now doubts that all the races of men are specifically identical. Thus we have the anatomical })osition of man firmly fixed in the system of nature, and he must be content to acknowledge his kinship not only with the higher animals nearest to him, but with the humblest animalcule. With all he shares a common material and many common fea- tures of structure. When we ascend to the somewhat higher plane of physiology we find in a general way the same relationship to animals. Of the four grand leading functions of the animal, nutrition, repro- duction, voluntary motion, and sensation, all are performed by man as by other animals. Here, however, there are some marked divergences connected with special anatomical struc- tures, on the one hand, and with his higher endowments on the MAN IN NATURE 485 Other. With regard to food, for example, man might be sup- posed to be limited by his masticatory and digestive apparatus to succulent vegetable substances. But by virtue of his inven- tive faculties he is practically unlimited, being able by artificial processes to adapt the whole range of vegetable and animal food substances to his use. He is very poorly furnished with natural tools to aid in procuring food, as claws, tusks, etc., but by invented implements he can practically surpass all other creatures. The long time of helplessness in infancy, while it is necessary for the development of his powers, is a practi- cal disadvantage which leads to many social arrangements and contrivances specially characteristic of man. Man's sensory powers, while inferior in range to those of many other animals, are remarkable for balance and completeness, leading to percep- tions of differences in colours, sounds, etc., which lie at the foundation of art. The specialization of the hand again connects itself with contrivances which render an animal naturally de- fenceless the most formidable of all, and an animal naturally gifted with indifferent locomotive powers able to outstrip all others in speed and range of locomotion. Thus the physiolo- gical endowments of man, while common to him with other animals, and in some respects inferior to theirs, present in com- bination with his higher powers points of difference which lead to the most special and unexpected results. In his ^hft^^leal- relations, using this term in its narrower sense, we may see still greater divergencies from the line of the lower animals. These may no doubt be connected with his greater volume of brain ; but recent researches seem to show that brain has more to do with motory and sensory powers than with those that are intellectual, and thus, that a larger brain is only indirectly connected with higher mental manifestations. Even in the lower animals it is clear that the ferocity of the tiger, the constructive instinct of the beaver, and the sagacity of the elephant depend on psychical powers which 486 MAN IN NATURE are beyond the reach of the anatomist's knife, and this is still more markedly the case in man. Following in part the in- genious analysis of Mivart, we may regard the psychical powers of man as reflex, instinctive, emotional, and intellectual ; and in each of these aspects we shall find points of resemblance to other animals, and of divergence from them. In regard to re- flex actions, or those which are merely automatic, inasmuch as they are intended to provide for certain important functions without thought or volition, their development is naturally in the inverse ratio of psychical elevation, and man is conse- quently, in this respect, in no way superior to lower animals. The same may be said with reference to instinctive powers, which provide often for complex actions in a spontaneous and unreasoning manner. In these also man is rather deficient than otherwise ; and since, from their nature, they limit their possessors to narrow ranges of activity, and fix them within a definite scope of experience and efiiciency, they would be incompatible with those higher and more versatile inventive powers which man possesses. The comb-building instinct of the bee, the nest-weaving instinct of the bird, are fixed and invariable things, obviously incompatible with the varied con- trivance of man ; and while instinct is perfect within its narrow range, it cannot rise beyond this into the sphere of unlimited thought and contrivance. Higher than mere instinct are the powers of imagination, memory, and association, and here man at once steps beyond his animal associates, and develops these in such a variety of ways, that even the rudest tribes of men, who often appear to trust more to these endowments than to higher powers, rise into a plane immeasurably above that of the highest and most intelligent brutes, and toward which they are unable, except to a very limited degree, to raise those of the more domesticable animals which they endeavour to train into companionship with themselves. It is, however, in these domesticated animals that we find the highest degree of approx- MAN IN NATURE 487 imation to ourselves in emotional development, and this is perhaps one of the points that fits them for such human asso- ciation. In approaching the higher psychical endowments, the affinity of man and the brute appears to diminish and at length to cease, and it is left to him alone to rise into the domain of the rational and ethical. Those supreme endowments of man we may, following the nomenclature of ancient philosophy and of our Sacred Scrip- tures, call " pneumatical " or spiritual. They consist of con- sciousness, reason, and moral volition. That man possesses these powers every one knows ; that they exist or can be de- veloped in lower animals no one has succeeded in proving. Here, at length, we have a severance between man and material nature. Yet it does not divorce him from the unity of nature, except on the principles of atheism. For if it separates him from animals, it allies him with the Power who made and planned the animals. To the naturalist the fact that such capacities exist in a being who in his anatomical structure so closely resembles the lower animals, constitutes an evidence of the independent existence of those powers and of their spiritual character and relation to a higher power which, I think, no metaphysical reasoning or materialistic scepticism will suffice to invalidate. It would be presumption, however, from the standpoint of the naturalist to discuss at length the powers of man's spiritual being. I may refer merely to a few points which illustrate at once his connection with other creatures, and his superiority to them as a higher member of nature. And, first, we may notice those axiomatic beliefs which lie at the foundation of human reasoning, and which, while appa- rently in harmony with nature, do not admit of verification except by an experience impossible to finite beings. Whether these are ultimate truths, or merely results of the constitution bestowed on us, or effects of the direct action of the creative mind on ours, they are to us like the instincts of animals — in- 488 MAN IN NATURE fallible and unchanging. Yet, just as the instincts of animals unfailingly connect them with their surroundings, our intui- tive beliefs fit us for understanding nature and for existing in it as our environment. These beliefs also serve to connect man with his fellow man, and in this aspect we may associate with them those universal ideas of right and wrong, of immortality, and of powers above ourselves, which pervade humanity. Another phase of this spiritual constitution is illustrated by the ways in which man, starting from powers and contrivances common to him and animals, develops them into new and higher uses and results. This is markedly seen in the gift ot speech. Man, like other animals, has certain natural utterances expressive of emotions or feelings. He can also, like some of them, imitate the sounds produced by animate or inanimate objects; while the constitution of his brain and vocal organs gives him special advantages for articulate utterance. But when he develops these gifts into a system of speech expres.s- ing not mere sounds occurring in nature, but by association nd analogy with these, properties and relations of objects and general and abstract ideas, he rises into the higher sphere of the spiritual. He thus elevates a power of utterance common to him with animals to a higher plane, and connecting it with his capacity for understanding nature and arriving at general truths, asserts his kinship to the great creative mind, and fur- nishes a link of connection between the material universe and the spiritual Creator. The manner of existence of man in nature is as well illus- trated by his arts and inventions as by anything else ; and these serve also to enlighten us as to the distinction between the natural and the artificial. Naturalists often represent man as dependent on nature for the first hints of his useful arts. There are in animal nature tailors, weavers, masons, potters, carpenters, miners, and sailors, independently of man, and many of the tools, implements, and machines which he is said MAN IN NATURE 489 to have invented were perfected in the structures of lower ani- mals long before he came into existence. In all these things man has been an assiduous learner from nature, though in some of them, as for example in the art of aerial navigation, he has striven in vain to imitate the powers possessed by other animals. But it may well be doubted whether man is in this respect so much an imitator as has been supposed, and whether the resemblance of his plans to those previously realized in nature does not depend on that general fitness of things which suggests to rational minds similar means to secure similar ends. But in saying this we in effect say that man is not only a part of nature, but that his mind is in harmony with the plans of nature, or, in other words, with the methods of the creative mind. Man is also curiously in harmony with ex- ternal nature in the combination in his works of the ideas of plan and adaptation, of ornament and use. In architecture, for example, devising certain styles or orders, and these for the most part based on imitations of natural things ; he adapts these to his ends, just as in nature types of structure are adapted to a great variety of uses, and he strives to combine, as in nature, perfect adaptation to use with conformity to type or style. So, in his attempts at ornament he copies natural forms, and uses these forms to decorate or conceal parts intended to serve essential purposes in the structure. This is at least the case in the purer styles of construction. It is in the more de- based styles that arches, columns, triglyphs, or buttresses are placed where they can serve no useful purpose, and become mere excrescences. But in this case the abnormality resulting breeds in the beholder an unpleasing mental confusion, and causes him, even when he is unable to trace his feelings to their source, to be dissatisfied with the result. Thus man is in harmony with that arrangement of nature which causes every ornamental part to serve some use, and which unites adaptation with plan. s. E. 35 490 MAN IN NATURE The following of nature must also form the basis of those fine arts which are not necessarily connected with any utility, and in man's pursuit of art of this kind we see one of the most recondite and at first sight inexplicable of his correspondences with the other parts of nature ; for there is no other creature tliat pursues art for its own sake. Modern archaeological dis- covery has shown that the art of sculpture began with the oldest known races of man, and that they succeeded in produc- ing very accurate imitations of natural objects. But from this primitive starting-point two ways diverge. One leads to the conventional and the grotesque, and this course has been followed by many semi-civilized nations. Another leads to accurate imitation of nature, along with new combinations .arising from the play of intellect and imagination. Let us look for a moment at the actual result of the development of these diverse styles of art, and at their effect on the culture of hu- manity as existing in nature. ^Ve may imagine a people who have wholly discarded nature in their art, and have devoted themselves to the monstrous and the grotesque. Such a people, so far as art is concerned, separates itself widely from nature and from the mind of the Creator, and its taste and j)Ossibly its morals sink to the level of the monsters it pro- duces. Again, we may imagine a people in all respects following nature in a literal and servile manner. Such a people would probably attain to but a very moderate amount of cul- ture, but having a good foundation, it might ultimately build up higher things. Lastly, we may fancy a people who, like the old Greeks, strove to add to the copying of nature a higher and ideal beauty by combining in one the best features of many natural objects, or devising new combinations not found in nature itself. In the first of these conditions of art we have a falling away from or caricaturing of the beauty of nature. In the second we have merely a pupilage to nature. In the third we find man aiming to be himself a creator, but basing his MAN IN NATURE 491 creations on what nature has given him. Thus all art worthy of the name is really a development of nature. It is true the eccentricities of art and fashion are so erratic that they may often seem to have no law. Yet they are all under the rule of nature ; and hence even uninstructed common-sense, unless dulled by long familiarity, detects in some degree their incon- gruity, and though it may be amused for a time, at length becomes wearied with the mental irritation and nervous dis- quiet which they produce. I may be permitted to add that all this applies with still greater force to systems of science and philosophy. Ultimately these must be all tested by the verities of nature to which man necessarily submits his intellect, and he who builds for aye must build on the solid ground of nature. The natural environ- ment presents itself in this connection as an educator of man. From the moment when infancy begins to exercise its senses on the objects around, this education begins — training the powers of observation and comparison, cultivating the concep- tion of the grand and beautiful, leading to analysis and abstract and general ideas. Left to itself, it is true this natural educa- tion extends but a little way, and ordinarily it becomes ob- scured or crushed by the demands of a hard utility, or by an artificial literary culture, or by the habitude of monstrosity and unfitness in art. Yet, when rightly directed, it is capable of becoming an instrument of the highest culture, intellectual, aesthetic, and even moral. A rational system of education would follow nature in the education of the young, and drop much that is arbitrary and artificial. Here I would merely remark, that when we find that the accurate and systematic study of nature trains most effectually some of the more prac- tical powers of mind, and leads to the highest development of taste for beauty in art, we see in this relation the unity of man and nature, and the unity of both with something higher than either. 492 MAN IN NATURE It may, however, occur to us here, that when we consider man as an improver and innovator in the world, there is much that suggests a contrariety between him and nature, and that, instead of being the pupil of his environment, he becomes its tyrant. In this aspect man, and especially civilized man, appears as the enemy of wild nature, so that in those districts which he has most fully subdued, many animals and plants have been exterminated, and nearly the whole surface has come under his processes of culture, and has lost the characteristics which belonged to it in its primitive state. Nay more, we find that by certain kinds of so-called culture man tends to exhaust and impoverish the soil, so that it ceases to minister to his com- fortable support, and becomes a desert. Vast regions of the earth are in this impoverished condition, and the westward march of exhaustion warns us that the time may come when even in comparatively new countries, like America, the land will cease to be able to sustain its inhabitants. Behind this stands a still farther and portentous possibility. The resources of chemistry are now being taxed to the utmost to discover methods by which the materials of human food may be pro- duced synthetically, and we may possibly, at some future time, find that albumen and starch may be manufactured cheaply from their elements by artificial processes. Such a discovery might render man independent of the animal and vegetable kingdoms. Agriculture might become an unnecessary and un- profitable art. A time might come when it would no longer be possible to find on earth a green field, or a wild animal ; and when the whole earth would be one great factory, in which toiling millions were producing all the materials of food, cloth- ing, and shelter. Such a world may never exist, but its pos- sible existence may be imagined, and its contemplation brings vividly before us the vast powers inherent in man as a sub- verter of the ordinary course of nature. Yet even this ultimate annulling of wild nature would be brought about not by any- MAN IN NATURE 493 thing preternatural in man, but simply by his placing himself in alliance with certain natural powers and agencies, and by their means attaining dominion over the rest. Here there rises before us a spectre which science and philosophy appear afraid to face, and which asks the dread question, — What is the cause of the apparent abnormality in the relations of man and nature? In attempting to solve this question, we must admit that the position of man, even here, is not without natural analogies. The stronger preys upon the weaker, the lower form gives place to the higher, and in the progress of geological time old species have died out in favour of newer, and old forms of life have been exterminated by later successors. Man, as the newest and highest of all, has thus the natural right to subdue and rule the world. Yet there can be little doubt that he uses this right unwisely and cruelly, and these terms themselves explain •why he does so, because they imply freedom of will. Given a system of nature destitute of any being higher than the instinctive animal, and introduce into it a free rational agent, and you have at once an element of instability. So long as his free thought and purpose continue in harmony with the arrangements of his environment, so long all will be har- monious ; but the very hypothesis of freedom implies that he ■can act otherwise, and so perfect is the equilibrium of existing things, that one wrong or unwise action may unsettle the nice balance, and set in operation trains of causes and effects producing continued and ever-increasing disturbance. Thus the most primitive state of man, though destitute of all me- chanical inventions, may have been better in relation to the other parts of nature than any that he has subsequently attained to. His " many inventions " have injured him in his natural relations. This " fall of man " we know as a matter of observation and experience has actually occurred, and it can be retrieved only by casting man back again into 494 ^lAN IN NATURE the circle of merely instinctive action, or by carrying him forward until, by growth in wisdom and knowledge, he becomes, fitted to be the lord of creation. The first method has been proved unsuccessful by the rebound of humanity against all the attempts to curb and suppress its liberty. The second has been the effort of all reformers and philanthropists since the world began, and its imperfect success affords a strong ground for clinging to the theistic view of nature, for soliciting the intervention of a Power higher than man, and for hoping for a final restitution of all things through the intervention of that Power. Mere materialistic evolution must ever and necessarily fail to account for the higher nature of man, and also for his moral aberrations. These only come rationally into the system of nature under the supposition of a Higher Intelligence, from whom man emanates, and whose nature he shares. But on this theistic view we are introduced to a kind of unity and of evolution for a future age, which is the great topic of revelation, and is not unknown to science and philo- sophy, in connection with the law of progress and develop- ment deducible from the geological history, in which an ascending series of lower animals culminates in man himself. Why should there not be a new and higher plane of existence to be attained to by humanity — a new geological period, so to speak, in which present anomalies shall be corrected, and the grand unity of the universe and its harmony with its- Maker fully restored. This is what Paul anticipates when he tells us of a " pneumatical " or spiritual body, to succeed ta the present natural or " psychical " one, or what Jesus Himself tells us when He says that in the future state we shall be like to the angels. Angels arc not known to us as objects of scientific observation, but such an order of beings is quite conceivable, and this not as supernatural, but as part of the order of nature. They are created beings like ourselves^ MAN IN NATURE 495 subject to the laws of the universe, yet free and intelHgent and hable to error, in bodily constitution freed from many of the limitations imposed on us, mentally having higher range and grasp, and consequently masters of natural powers not under our control. In short, we have here pictured to us an order of beings forming a part of nature, yet in their powers as miraculous to us as we might be supposed to be to lower animals, could they think of such things. This idea of angels bridges over the great natural gulf between humanity and deity, and illustrates a higher plane than that of man in his present state, but attainable in the future. Dim per- ■ceptions of this would seem to constitute the substratum of the ideas of the so-called polytheistic religions. Christianity itself is in this aspect not so much a revelation of the super- natural as the highest bond of the great unity of nature. It reveals to us the perfect Man, who is also one with God, and the mission of this Divine Man to restore the harmonies of God and humanity, and consequently also of man with his natural environment in this world, and with his spiritual en- vironment in the higher world of the future. If it is true that nature now groans because of man's depravity, and that man himself shares in the evils of this disharmony with nature around him, it is clear that if man could be restored to his true place in nature he would be restored to happiness and to harmony with God, and if, on the other hand, he can be restored to harmony with God, he will then be restored also to harmony with his natural environment, and so to life and happiness and immortality. It is here that the old story of Eden, and the teaching of Christ, and the prophecy of the New Jerusalem strike the same note which all material nature gives forth when we interrogate it respecting its relations to man. The profound manner in w-hich these truths appear in the teaching of Christ has perhaps not been appreciated as it should, because we have not sought in that teaching the 49^ MAN IN NATURE philosophy of nature which it contains. When He points to the common weeds of the fields, and asks us to consider the garments more gorgeous than those of kings in which God has clothed them, and when He says of these same wild flowers, so daintily made by the Supreme Artificer, that to-day they are, and to-morrow are cast into the oven. He gives us not merely a lesson of faith, but a deep insight into that want of unison which, centring in humanity, reaches all the way from the wild flower to the God who made it, and requires for its rectification nothing less than the breathing of that Divine Spirit which first evoked order and life out of primeval chaos. References : — Articles in Princeton Review on Man in Nature and on Evolution. "The Story of the Earth and Man." London, 1890. " Modern Ideas of Evolution." London, 1891. Nature as an Educator. Canadian Record of Science, 1890. INDEX OF PRINCIPAL TOPICS. Airbreathers, their Origin and His- tory, 257, 303. Alpine and Arctic Plants, their Geological History, 425. American Stone Age, 464. Animals, their Apparition and Succession, 169. their Geological History, 176, 187, 194. Permanent Forms of, 87, 180. Anthropic Age, 461. Antiquity of Man, 469. Arctic Climates in the Past, 213. Atlantic, its Origin and History, 57. ■ Cosmical Functions of, 72. its Influence on Climate, 81. Deposits in, 83. Migrations across, 84. Future of, 90. Azores, their Animals, 40S. Baphetes planiceps, 263. Bay of Fundy, its Deposits, 312. Footprints on Shores of, 311. Bermudas, their Flora, etc., 85. Boulders, Belts of, on Lower St. Lawrence, 345. Boulder-Clay, Nature, etc. , of, 360. Cave Men, 476. Canstadt Race, 474. Chaos, Vision of, 90. Chronology of Pleistocene, 470. S. E. Climate, its Causes, 81. as related to Plants, 215. Climatal Changes, 382. Coal, its Nature and Structure, 235. its Origin and Growth, 233. Summary of Facts relating to, 241. of Mesozoic and Tertiary, 249. its Connection with Erect Forests, 296. Continents and Islands, 402. Permanence of, 31, 403. Contrast of land and sea-borne Ice, 360. Cordilleran Glaciers, 369. Cro-magnon Race, 474. Crust and Sub-crust, 62. Dawn of Life, 95. Deluge, The, 467. Dendrerpeton Acadianuni, 270. Determination in Nature, 329. Development of Life, 23. Laws of, 194. Distribution of Animals and Plants, 401. Drift of Western Canada, 369. Early Man, 459. Engis Race, 472. Eozoon, Discovery of, iii. Nature of, 112. Contemporaries of, 129. Teachings of, 135. 497 3^6 498 INDEX OF PRINCIPAL TOPICS. Eozoon, Preservation of and Struc- ture, 143. Eyes, earliest Types of, 331. Evolution, its partial Character, 188. Flora of White Mountains, 421. Floras originate in the Arctic, 297. Floating Ice, 360. Footprints of Reptiles, 260. of Limulus, 319. Fossils, Preservation of, 136. Fucoids, 311. Galapagos, how Peopled, 412. Geographical Changes and Climate, 390. Geological Record, Imperfection of, 40. Glaciers, Work of, 353. Glacial Period, Conditions of, 375. Gulf Stream, 3S8. Hydrous Silicates, 144. Huronian as a Geological System, 104. Hylonomus Lyelli, 279. Icebergs, their Nature and Work, 348. Ice Age, the, 343. Imperfection of the Geological Re- cord, 40. Land and Water, 58. Land Snails, Earliest, 247. Labyrinthodonts, their Origin and History, 265. Laurentian System, 97. Life in the, 107. Laurentide Glaciers, 3^64, 368. Leda Clay of Lower St. Lawrence, 365. Life, First Appearance of, 19, 96, 157. Limbs, the Earliest, 337. Limulus, Footprints of, 319. Magmas under Crust of the Earth, 63- Mammoth Age, 466. Man in Nature, 484. Early, 461. an Imitator of Natural Objects, 490. at War with other Natural Agencies, 495. in harmony with Nature, 496. Markings, Footprints, etc., 301. Rill and Rain, etc., 317. Microsauria, 279, Migrations of Plants, 434. Millipedes of Carboniferous Age, 295. Mineral Charcoal, 237. Missouri Coteau, 271. Mountains, Origin of, 33. Classes of, 66. Mount Washington, 426. Nature, Various Senses ot the Term, 483. Neanthropic Age, 472. Ocean, the Atlantic, 58, 67. Oceanic Islands, 407. Palanthropic Age, 462. Permanence of Continents, 31, 403. of Animal Forms, 87, 180. Plants, Geological History of, 202. as Indicators of Time and Climate, 229. of the Erian, Carboniferous, etc., 202. of the Pleistocene, 439. INDEX OF PRINCIPAL TOPICS. 499 Pleistocene, Tabular View of, 472. Polygenesis of Species, 418. Predetermination in Nature, 329. Primitive Rocks, 16. Protozoa, their Place in Nature, 152. Pseudo-Fucoids, 318. Pupa Vetusta, 288. Races of Early Men, 474. Rill Marks, 317. Scorpions, Carboniferous, 295. Sigillaria', Erect, 276. Sorde, Cave of, 476. Species, Permanence of, 87, 180. Origin of, 418. Sponges in Cambro-Silurian, 46. Spore-cases in Coal, 234. Stigmaria, 246. Stone Age in America, 464. Terraces of Lower St 346. Lawrence, Tides of the Bay of Fundy, 312. Time, Geological, 416. Tracks of Animals, 51. Trees, Erect, with Animal Remains, 276. Tuckerman's Ravine, 427. Underclays, their Origin and Nature, 236. Vegetable Life, the Earliest, 338. Vegetable Kingdom, its History, 202. Vertebrates, History of, 183. Vision of Creation, 90. Worlds, the Making of, 9, 14. Worm Tracks, 318. White Mountains, 426. Zoological Regions, 405. Butler & Tanner, The Selwood Printing Works, Frome, and London. Date Due / ■'■ i^w_/*^>4: .' ^^'^f ■C(.l.&...:...-.-<' cEB 13 ^* ':^ jf7T# n Ir- 3^979 kf^-^- 6 "f?7# Te>o ^ (7^ ' iPR.2 4.MZ9.9H a JIVERSITY OF B.C. LIBRARY 3 9424 02477 0221 ■ v.. '->>, ,.*r-U?^J ■i^