■■'■ ■^*':-
m-.
;«?;?■,.
Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2010 with funding from
University of British Columbia Library
http://www.archive.org/details/somesalientpoiOOdaws
SOME SALIENT POINTS
SCIENCE OF THE EARTH
BY
SIR J. WILLIAM DAWSON
C.M.G., LL.D., F.R.S., F.G.S., ETC.
WITH FORTY-SIX ILLUSTRATIONS
Montreal
W. DRYSDALE AND CO.
232, ST. JAMES STREET
.Mucccxciii
WORKS BY THE SAME AUTHOR.
Modern Science in Bible Lands. With Illus-
trations. Popular Edition, Revised. Crown 8vo, 6/-
The Origin of the World, according to Revela-
tion and Science. Sixth Edition. Crown 8vo, cloth, 7/6.
The Story of the Earth and Man. Tenth
Edition, with Twenty Illustrations. Crown Svo, cloth, 7/6.
Fossil Men and Their Modern Representa-
tives. .\n atteniiit to illustrate the Characters and Con-
dition of Pre-historic Men in Europe, by those of the
American Races. With numerous Illustrations. Third
Edition. Crown Svo, cloth, 7/6.
LONDON : HODDER AND STOUGHTON.
PREFACE.
'T^HE present work contains much that is new, and
much in correction and ampHfication of that
which is old ; and is intended as a closing deliverance
on some of the more important questions of geology,
on the part of a veteran worker, conversant in his
younger days with those giants of the last generation,
who, in the heroic age of geological science, piled up
the mountains on which it is now the privilege of their
successors to stand.
J. W. D.
Montreal, 1893.
CONTENTS.
CHAPTER I. PACE
The Starting-Poini 3
CHAPTER n.
World-Making 9
CHAPTER HI.
The Imperfection' of the Geological Record • • • 39
CHAPTER IV.
The History of the North Atlantic 57
CHAPTER V.
The Dawn of Life 95
CHAPTER VL
What may be Learned from Eozoon 135
CHAPTER VII.
The Apparition and Succession of Animal Forms . . 169
CHAPTER VHI.
The Genesis and Migrations of Plants .... 201
CHAPTER IX.
The Growth of Coai 233
vm CONTENTS.
CHAPTER X. 'A-.t
The Oldest Aik-bre.viiiers 257
CHAPTER XI.
Markings, Footprints, and Eucoids 311
CHAPTER XH.
Pre-determination in Nature 329
CHAPTER XHI.
The Great Ice Ace 345
CHAPTER XIV.
Causes of Climatal Change 383
CHAPTER XV,
The Distkiuution ov Animals and Plants as Related to
Geographical and Geological Changes . . . 401
CHAPTER X\ I.
Alpine AND Arctic Plants in Connection with Geological
History 425
CHAPTER XVII.
Early Man 459
CHAI'IKR XVIII.
Man in Nature 481
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.
Cape Trinity on the Saguenay
Folding of the Earth's Crust .
Cambro-Sihirian Sponges
Map of the North Atlantic
Nature-print of Eozoon .
Laurentian Hills, Lower St. Lawrence
Section from Petite Nation Seigniory to St. Jerome
The Laurentian Nucleus of the American Continent
Attitude of Limestone at St. Pierre
Weathered Eozoon and Canals
Group of Canals in Eozoon
Amoeba and Actinophrys
Minute Foraminiferal Forms ,
Section of a Nummulite
Portion of Shell of Calcarina
Weathered Eozoon with Oscular tubes
Diagram showing different States of Fossilization
Tubulate Coral ......
Slice of Crystalline Lower Silurian Limestone
Walls of Eozoon penetrated with Canals
Joint of a Crinoid .....
Shell from a Silurian Limestone, Wales .
Casts of Canals of Eozoon in Serpentine
Canals of Eozoon .
Primordial Trilobites
Primitive Fishes
Devonian Forest .
Coal Section in Nova Scotia .
of
I'AGE
Frontispiece
To face 9
39
57
95
100
lOI
103
109
112
"3
"5
119
123
127
128
135
To face
To fac
Cell of
To face
139
141
141
145
146
147
147
169
185
201
233
ILLUSTRATIONS.
Skeleton of Hylonomus Lyelli
Footprints of Hylopits Logani
Humerus and Jaws of Dendrerpeioji
Replilifeious Tree .
Microsaurian, restored
Dolkhosoma longissiinian, restored
Pupa and Coniihis .
Millipedes and Insect
Footprints of Limiiliis
Ritsichniles Grenvillensis
Restoration of Protospongia ietrauema
Giant Net-sponge .....
Boulder Beach, Little Metis .
Palaeography of North .\merica
Distribution of Animals in Time
Tuckerman's Ravine and Mount Washington
Pre-historic Skulls .....
Primitive .Sculpture . ' .
7;->
PAGE
261
277
279
287
289
295
329
337
343
383
401
425
459
481
TABLE OF GEOLOGICAL HISTORY.
Non-geological readers will find in the following table a
condensed explanation of the more important technical terms
used in the following pages. The order is from older to
newer.
GREATER SYSTEMS OF
PERIODS. FORMATIONS.
characteristic fossils.
i
Arch.«an or
Eozoic
Pre-Laurentian
Laurentian
Protozoa Protophyta
PAi,.4i:ozoic
Huronian
Cambrian
Cambro- Silurian*
Silurianf
Devonian
Carboniferous
Permian
Crustaceans Alga.>
Molluscs Cryptogamous
Worms and
Corals, etc. Gymnospermous
Fishes Plants.
Amphibians
Mesozoic
Triassic
Jurassic
Cretaceous
C Reptiles Pines and
i Birds Cycads
[Earliest Mammals. Trees of modern
types.
Kainozoic or
Tertiary
Eocene
Miocene
Pliocene
Pleistocene
Modern
Higher Mammals
of extinct forms
Recent Mammals Modern Plants.
and
Man.
Ordovician of Lapworth.
f Salopian of Lapworth.
ERRATA IN
LIST AND LEGENDS OF ILLUSTRATIONS, ETC.
Owing to an illness while the work was in press, the author was
unable to revise proofs of the Legends of the Illustrations ; hence
the following errata.
List of Illustrations.
Page ix, for "Tabulate" read " Trzbulate."
Page X, for ' ' Palaeography "* read ' ' Pateo^^ography. "
Cambro-silitrian Sponges, page 39.
For " Lanotkrix " read " Lasiothrix."
,, " Palasosaa'us " read " PalKosamis."
Sped tn en cf Eozoon, page 135.
For " Genera " read " Genera/."
Diagram of Coral, page 139.
For " T?/bulate" read " Tabulate."
Primitive Fishes, page 185.
For " Pterichth?/s " read " Pterichthrs."
Pupa and Conulus, page 289.
For " Darwin" read " Dawson."
,, " prisca "read " priscus."
In note for figured " above " read figured " here."
Carboniferous Millipedes, page 295.
For " Darwin " read " Dawson."
Footprints of Limulus, page 311.
For " Protfchnites " read " Prot/chnites."
Restoration of Protospongia, page 329.
For " Giluru-" read " Siluro-."
Maps of North America, page 383.
For " surmergence" read "submergence."
Distribution of Animals, page 401.
After ' ' Cuttlefishes " insert " 6. Brachiopods. "
Page 485, line 10 from bottom, for " physical" read " psychical.'
THE STARTING-POINT.
DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF
PROF, ROBERT JAMESON,
Of the University of Edinburgh, my first Teacher in Geology,
WHOSE Lectures I attended, and whose kind Advice and
Guidance I enjoyed, in the Winter of 1840-1841.
S. E.
Hkadlands and Spurs— Popular Papers on Leading
Topics — Revisitinc Old Localities — Dedications —
General Scope oe thi; Work
CHAPTER I.
THE STARTING-POINT.
AN explorer trudging along some line of coast, or traversing
some mountain region, may now and then reach a pro-
jecting headland, or bold mountain spur, which may enable
him to command a wide view of shore and sea, or of hill and
valley, before and behind. On such a salient point he may
sit down, note-book and glass in hand, and endeavour to cor-
relate the observations made on the ground he has traversed,
and may strain his eyes forward in order to anticipate the
features of the track in advance. Such are the salient points
in a scientific pilgrimage of more than half a century, to which
I desire to invite the attention of the readers of these papers.
In doing so, I do not propose to refer, except incidentally, to
subjects which I have already discussed in books accessible to
general readers, but rather to those which are imbedded in
little accessible transactions, or scientific periodicals, or which
have fallen out of print. I cannot therefore pretend to i)lace
the reader on all the salient points of geological science, or
even on all of those I have myself reached, but merely to lead
him to some of the viewing-places which I have found particu-
larly instructive to myself.
For similar reasons it is inevitable that a certain personal
element shall enter into these reminiscences, though this auto-
biograi)hical feature will be kept as much in the background
as possible. It is also to be anticipated that the same subject
THE STARTING-POINT
may appear more than once, but from different points of view,
since it is often useful to contemplate certain features of the
landscape from more than one place of observation.
To drop the figure, the reader will find in these papers, in a
plain and popular form, yet it is hoped not in a superficial
manner, some of the more important conclusions of a geo-
logical worker of the old school, who, while necessarily giving
attention to certain specialties, has endeavoured to take a
broad and comprehensive view of the making of the world in
all its aspects.
The papers are of various dates ; but in revising them for
publication I have endeavoured, without materially changing
their original form, to bring them up to the present time, and
to state any corrections or changes of view that have com-
mended themselves to me in the meantime. Such changes or
modifications of view must of necessity occur to every geologi-
cal worker. Sometimes, after long digging and hammering in
some bed rich in fossils, and carrying home a bag laden with
treasures, one has returned to the spot, and turned over the
debris of previous excavation, with the result of finding some-
thing rare and valuable, before overlooked. Or, in carefully
trimming and chiselling out the matrix of a new fossil, so as
to uncover all its parts, unexpected and novel features may
develop themselves. Thus, if we were right or partially right
before, our new experience may still enable us to enlarge our
views or to correct some misapprehensions. In that spirit I
have endeavoured to revise these papers, and while I have
been able to add confirmations of views long ago expressed,
have been willing to accept corrections and modifications based
on later discoveries.
In the somewhat extended span of work which has been
allotted to me, I have made it my object to discover new facts,
and to this end have spared no expenditure of time and
labour; but I have felt that the results of discoveries in the
THE STARTING-POINT
works of God should not be confined to a coterie, but should
be made public for the benefit of all. Hence I have gladly
embraced any opportunities to popularise my results, whether
in lectures, articles, popular books, or in the instruction of
students, and this in a manner to give accurate knowledge,
and perhaps to attract the attention of fellow-workers to points
which they might overlook if presented merely in dry and
technical papers. These objects I have in view in connection
with the present collection of papers, and also the fact that my
own pilgrimage is approaching its close, and that I desire to
aid others who may chance to traverse the ground I have
passed over, or who may be preparing to pass beyond the
point I have reached.
To a naturalist of seventy years the greater part of life lies
in the past, and in revising these papers I have necessarily had
my thoughts directed to the memory of friends, teachers,
guides, and companions in labour, who have passed away. I
have therefore, as a slight token of loving and grateful remem-
brance dedicated these papers to the memory of men I have
known and loved, and who, I feel, would sympathise with me
in spirit, in the attempt, however feeble, to direct attention to
the variety and majesty of those great works of the Creator
which they themselves delighted to study.
Since the design of these papers excludes special details as
to Canadian geology, or that of those old eastern countries to
which I have given some attention, I must refer for them to
other works, and shall append such reference of this kind as
may be necessary. At the same time it will be observed that
as my geological work has been concerned most largely with
the oldest and newest rocks of the earth, and with the history
of life rather than with rocks and minerals, there must neces-
sarily be some preponderance in these directions, which might
however, independently of personal considerations, be justified
by the actual value of these lines of investigation, and by the
THE STARTING-POINT
special interest attaching to them in the present state of scien-
tific discovery.
Having thus defined my starting-point, I would now with all
respect and deference ask the reader to accompany me from
])oint to point, and to examine for himself the objects which
may appear either near, or in the dim uncertain distance, in
illustration of what the world is, and how it became what it is.
Perhaps, in doing so, he may be able to perceive much more
than I have been able to discover ; and if so, I shall rejoice,
even if such further insight should correct or counteract some
of my own impressions. It is not given to any one age or set
of men to comprehend all the mysteries of nature, or to arrive
at a point where it can be said, there is no need of farther
exploration. Even in the longest journey of the most adven-
turous traveller there is an end of discovery, and, in the study
of nature, cape rises beyond cape and mountain behind moun-
tain interminably. The finite cannot comprehend the infinite,
the temporal the eternal. We need not, however, on that
account be agnostics, for it is still true that, within the scope
of our narrow powers and opportunities, the Supreme Intelli-
gence reveals to us in nature His power and divinity ; and it is
this, and this alone, that gives attraction and dignity to natural
science.
WORLD-MAKIXG.
DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF
ADAM SEDGWICK AND SIR RODERICK IMPEY MURCHISON',
Whose joint Labours cakkisd
OUR Knowledge of the History of the Earth
TWO Stages farther back,
AND WHOSE Differences of Opinion served to render
MORE glorious THEIR VICTORIES.
Vision of a Xascent World — Thk Oi.ukst Rocks — De-
velopment OF Lite — Fok>l\tiox of Continents —
In what Sense Permanent — America as an Example
^2- - '^
CHAPTER II.
WORLD-MAKING.
GEOLOGICAL reading, especially when of a strictly
uniformitarian character and in warm weather, some-
times becomes monotonous ; and I confess to a feeling of
drowsiness creeping over me when preparing material for a pre-
sidential address to the American Association for the Advance-
ment of Science in August, 1883. In these circumstances I
became aware of the presence of an unearthly visitor, who
announced himself as of celestial birth, and intimated to me
that being himself free from those restrictions of space and
time which are so embarrassing to earthly students, he was pre-
pared for the moment to share these advantages with me, and
to introduce me to certain outlying parts of the universe,
where I might learn something of its origin and €arly history.
He took my hand, and instantly we were in the voids of spac2.
Turning after a moment, he pointed to a small star and said,
"That is the star you call the sun ; here, you see, it is only about
the third magnitude, and in a few seconds it will disappear."
These few seconds, indeed, reduced the whole visible firma-
ment to a mere nebulous haze like the Milky ^^'ay, and we
seemed to be in blank space. But pausing for a moment I
became aware that around us were nmltitudes of dark bodies,
so black that they were, so to speak, negatively visible, even
in the almost total darkness around. Some seemed large
and massive, some a mere drift of minute particles, formless
and without distinct limits. Some were swiftly moving, others
lO WORLD-MAKING
stationary, or merely revolving on their own axes. It was a
" horror of great darkness," and I trembled with fear. "This,"
said my guide, "is vdiat the old Hebrew seer called tohu ve
bohii, ' formless and void,' the ' Tiamat ' or abyss of the old
Chaldeans, the ' chaos and old night ' of the Greeks. Your
nmndane physicists have not seen it, but they speculate re-
garding it, and occupy themselves with questions as to whether
it can be lightened and vivified by mere attractive force, or by
collision of dark bodies impinging on each other with vast
momentum. 'J'heir speculations are vain, and lead to nothing,
because they ha\-e no data wherefrom to calculate the in-
finite and eternal Power who determined either the attraction
or tlie motion, or who willed which portion of this chaos
was to become cosmos, and which was to remain for ever
dead and dark. Let us turn, however, to a more hopeful
prospect." We sped away to another scene. Here were
vast luminous bodies, such as we call nebulae. Some were
globular, others disc-like, others annular or like spiral wisps,
and some were composed of several concentric shells or rings.
All were in rapid rotation, and presented a glorious and bril-
liant spectacle. "This," said my guide, " is matter of the same
kind with that we have just been considering ; but it has been
set in active motion. The fiat ' Let there be light ! ' has been
issued to it. Nor is its motion in vain. Each of these ne-
bulous masses is the material of a system of worlds, and they
will produce systems of different forms in accordance with the
various shapes and motions which you observe. Such bodies
are well known to earthly astronomers. One of them, the great
nebula of Andromeda, has been photographed, and is a vast
system of luminous rings of vapour placed nearly edgewise to
the earth, and hundreds of times greater than the whole solar
system, but now let us annihilate lime, and consider the^e
gigantic bodies as they will be in the course of many millions
of years." Listantaneously these vast nebuUxj had concentratetl
WORLD- MAKING II
themselves into systems of suns and planets, but with this
difference from ours, that the suns were very large and sur-
rounded with a wide luminous haze, and each of the planets
was self-luminous, like a little sun. In some the planets were
dancing up and down in spiral lines. In others they were
moving in one plane. In still others, in every variety of
direction. Some had vast numbers of little planets and
satellites. Others had a few of larger size. There were even
some of these systems that had a pair of central suns of con-
trasting colours. The whole scene was so magnificent and
beautiful that I thought 1 could never weary of gazing on it.
" Here," said he, " we have the most beautiful condition of
systems of worlds, when considered from a merely physical point
of view : the perfection of solar and planetary luminousness, but
which is destined to pass away in the interest of things more
important, if less showy. This is the condition of the great
star Sirius, which the old priest astronomers of the Nile
Valley made so much of in their science and religion, and
which they called Sothis. It is now known by your star-
gazers to be vastly larger than your sun, and fifty times more
brilliant.^ Let us select one of these systems somewhat
similar to the solar system, and suppose that the luminous
atmospheres of its nearer i)lanets are beginning to wane in
brilliancy. Here is one of them, through whose halo of light
we can see the body of the planet. What do you now per-
ceive ?" The planet referred to was somewhat larger in appear-
ance than our earth, and, approaching near to it, I could see
that it had a cloud-bearing firmament, and that it seemed to
have continents and oceans, though disposed in more regular
forms than on our own planet, and with a smaller proportion
of land. Looking at it more closely, I searched in vain for
* In evidence of these and other statements I may refer to Iluggins'
recent address as President of the British Association, and to tlie " Story
of the Heavens," etc., by Sir Robert Ball.
12 WORLD-MAKING
any sign of animal life, but I saw a vast profusion of what
might be plants, but not like those of this world.^ These were
trees of monstrous stature, and their leaves, which were of
great size and shaped like fronds of seaweeds, were not usually
green, but variegated with red, crimson and orange. The sur-
face of the land looked like beds of gigantic specimens ot
Colias and similar variegated-leaved plants, the whole present-
ing a most gorgeous yet grotesque spectacle. " This," said my
guide, " is the primitive vegetation which clothes each of the
planets in its youthful state. The earth was once so clothed,
in the time v,-hen vegetable life alone existed, and there were
no animals to prey upon it, and when the earth was, like the
world you now look upon, a paradise of plants ; for all things
in nature are at first in their best estate. This vegetation is
known to you on the earth only by the Carbon and Graphite
buried in your oldest rocks. It still lingers on your neighbour
Mars,~ which has, however, almost passed beyond this stage,
and we are looking forward before long to see a still more
gigantic though paler development of it in altogether novel
shapes on the great continents that are being formed on the
surface of Jupiter. But look again." And time being again
annihilated, I saw the same world, now destitute of any
luiiiinous envelope, with a few dark clouds in its atmosphere,
and presenting just the same appearance which I would sup-
pose our earth to present to an astronomer viewing it with a
powerful telescope from the moon. " Here we are at home
again,"' said my guide; "good-bye." I found myself nodding
over my table, and that my ])en had just dropped from my
hand, making a large blot on my paper. My dream, however,
* We shall see farther on that there is reason to believe that the primitive
land vegetation was more diflerent from that of the Devonian and Carboni-
ferous than it is from that of the present day.
'^ Mars is probably a stage behind the earth in its development, and the
ruddy line of its continents would seem to be due to some organic covering.
WORI.D-MAKING 1 3
gave me a hint as to a subject, and I determined to devote
my address to a consideration of questions whicli geology has
not solved, or has only imperfectly and hypothetically dis-
cussed.
Such unsolved or partially solved questions must necessarily
exist in a science which covers the whole history of the earth
in time. At the beginning it allies itself with astronomy and
physics and celestial chemistry. At the end it runs into
human history, and is mixed up with archaeology and anthro-
pology. Throughout its whole course it has to deal with
tjuestions of meteorology, geography and biology. In short,
there is no department of physical or biological science, with
which this many-sided study is not allied, or at least on which
the geologist may not presume to trespass. When, therefore,
it is proposed to discuss in the present chapter some of the
unsolved problems and disputed questions of this universal
science, the reader need not be surprised if it should be some-
what discursive.
Perhaps we may begin at the utmost limits of the subject by
remarking that in matters of natural and physical science we
are met at the outset with the scarcely solved question as to
our own place in the nature which we study, and the bearing
of this on the difficulties we encounter. The organism of man
is decidedly a part of nature. We place ourselves, in this
aspect, in the sub-kingdom vertebrata and class mammalia,
and recognise the fact that man is the terminal link in a chain
of being, extending throughout geological time. But the or-
ganism is not all that belongs to man, and when we regard him
as a scientific inquirer, we raise a new question. If the human
mind is a part of nature, then it is subject to natural law,
and nature includes mind as well as matter. Indeed, without
being absolute idealists we may hold that mind is more potent
than matter, and nearer to the real essence of things. Our
science is in any case necessarily dualistic, being the product
14 WORLD-MAKING
of the reaction of mind on nature, and must be largely sub-
jective and anthropomorphic. Hence, no doubt, arises much
of the controversy of science, and much of the unsolved diffi-
culty. We recognise this when we divide science into that
which is experimental, or depends on apparatus, and that which
is observational and classificatory — distinctions these which
relate not so much to the objects of science as to our methods
of pursuing them. This view also opens up to us the thought
that the domain of science is practically boundless, for who
can set limits to the action of mind on the universe, or of the
universe on mind. It follows that science, as it exists at any
one time, must be limited on all sides by unsolved mysteries ;
and it will not serve any good purpose to meet these with
clever guesses. If we so treat the enigmas of the sphinx
nature, we shall surely be devoured. Nor, on the other hand,
must we collapse into absolute despair, and resign ourselves to
the confession of inevitable ignorance. It becomes us rather
boldly to confront the unsolved questions of nature, and to
wrestle with their difficulties till we master such as we can,
and cheerfully leave those we cannot overcome to be grappled
with by our successors.
Fortunately, as a geologist, I do not need to invite attention
to those transcendental questions which relate to the ultimate
constitution of matter, the nature of the ethereal medium filling
space, the absolute difference or identity of chemical elements,
the cause of gravitation, the conservation and dissipation of
energy, the nature of life, or the primary origin of bioplasmic
matter. I may take the much more humble role of an in-
quirer into the unsolved or partially .solved problems which
meet us in considering that short and imperfect record which
geology studies in the rocky layers of the earth's crust, and
which leads no farther back than to the time when a solid
rind had already formed on the earth, and was already covered
with an ocean. This record of geology covers but a small
WORLD-MAKING 1 5
part of the history of the earth and of the system to which it
belongs, nor does it enter at all into the more recondite
problems involved ; still it forms, I believe, some necessary
preparation at least to the comprehension of these. If we are
to go farther back, we must accept the guidance of physicists
rather than of geologists, and I must say that in this physical
cosmology both geologists and general readers are likely to
find themselves perplexed with the vagaries in which the most
sober mathematicians may indulge. We are told that the
original condition of the solar system was that of a vaporous
and nebulous cloud intensely heated and whirling rapidly
round, that it probably came into this condition by the impact
of two dark solid bodies striking each other so violently, that
they became intensely heated and resolved into the smallest
possible fragments. Lord Kelvin attributes this impact to
their being attracted together by gravitative force. Croll ^
argues that in addition to gravitation these bodies must have
had a proper motion of great velocity, which Lord Kelvin
thinks " enormously " improbable, as it would require the
solid bodies to be shot against each other with a marvellously
true aim, and this not in the case of the sun only, but of all
the stars. It is rather more improbable than it would be to
affirm that in the artillery practice of two opposing armies,
cannon balls have thousands of times struck and shattered
each other midway between the hostile batteries. The ques-
tion, we are told, is one of great moment to geologists, since
on the one hypothesis the duration of our system has amounted
to only about twenty millions of years ; on the other, it may
have lasted ten times that number.- In any case it seems a
strange way of making systems of worlds, that they should
result from the chance collision of multitudes of solid bodies
^ " Stellar Evolution."
- Other facts favour the sliorter time (Clarence King, Am. Jl. of Science,
vol. xlv. , 3rd series),
S. E. 2
l6 WORLD-MAKING
rushing hither and thither in space, and it is almost equally
strange to imagine an intelligent Creator banging these bodies
about like billiard balls in order to make worlds. Still, in that
case we might imagine them not to be altogether aimless.
The question only becomes more complicated when with
Grove and Lockyer we try to reach back to an antecedent
condition, when there are neither solid masses nor nebulas,
but only an inconceivably tenuous and universally diffused
medium made up of an embryonic matter, which has not yet
even resolved itself into chemical elements. How this could
establish any motion within itself tending to aggregation in
masses, is quite inconceivable. To plodding geologists labori-
ously collecting facts and framing conclusions therefrom, such
flights of the mathematical mind seem like the wildest fan-
tasies of dreams. We are glad to turn from them to examine
those oldest rocks, which are to us the foundation stones of
the earth's crust.
What do we know of the oldest and most primitive rocks ?
At this moment the question may be answered in many and
discordant ways ; yet the leading elements of the answer may
be given very simply. The oldest rock formation known to
geologists is the Lower Laurentian, the Fundamental Gneiss,
the Lewisian formation of Scotland, the Ottawa gneiss of
Canada, the lowest Archaean crystalline rocks. This forma-
tion, of enormous thickness, corresponds to what the older
geologists called the fundamental granite, a name not to be
scouted, for gneiss is only a stratified or laminated granite.
Perhaps the main fact in relation to this old rock is that it is a
gneiss ; that is, a rock at once bedded and crystalline, and
having for its dominant ingredient the mineral orthoclasc, a
compound of silica, alumina and potash, in which are imbedded,
as in a paste, grains and crystals of quartz and hornblende.
We know very well from its texture and composition that it
cannot be a product of mere heat, and being a bedded rock
WORLD-MAKING 1 7
we infer that it was laid down layer by layer in the manner
of aqueous deposits. On the other hand, its chemical com-
position is quite different from that of the muds, sands and
gravels usually deposited from water. Their special charac-
ters are caused by the fact that they have resulted from the
slow decay of rocks like these gneisses, under the operation of
carbon dioxide and water, whereby the alkaline matter and
the more soluble part of the silica have been washed away,
leaving a residue mainly silicious and aluminous. Such
more modern rocks tell of dry land subjected to atmospheric
decay and rain-wash. If they have any direct relation to the
old gneisses, they are their grandchildren, not their parents.
On the contrary, the oldest gneisses show no pebbles or sand
or limestone — nothing to indicate that there was then any
land undergoing atmospheric waste, or shores with sand
and gravel. For all that we know to the contrary, these
old gneisses may have been deposited in a shoreless sea, hold-
ing in solution or suspension merely what it could derive
from a submerged crust recently cooled from a state of fusion,
still thin, and exuding here and there through its fissures
heated waters and volcanic products. This, it may be observed
here, is just what we have a right to expect, if the earth was
once a heated or fluid mass, and if our oldest Laurentian rocks
consist of the first beds or layers deposited upon it, perhaps by
a heated ocean. It has been well said that " the secret of the
earth's hot youth has been well kept." But with the help of
physical science we can guess at an originally heat-liquefied
ball with denser matter at its centre, lighter and oxidised
matter at its surface. We can imagine a scum or crust form-
ing at the surface ; and from what we know of the earth's in-
terior, nothing is more likely to have constituted that slaggy
' Carbon dioxide, the great agent in the decay of silicious rocks, must
then have constituted a very much larger part of the atmosphere than at
present.
WORLD-MAKING
crust than the material of our old gneisses. As to its bedded
character, this may have arisen in part from the addition of
cooling layers below, in part from the action of heated \Yater
above, and in part from pressure or tension ; while, wherever
it cracked or became broken, its interstices would be injected
with molten matter from beneath. All this may be conjecture,
but it is based on known facts, and is the only probable con-
jecture. If correct, it would account for the fact that the
gneissic rocks are the lowest and oldest that we reach in every
part of the earth.
In short, the fundamental gneiss of the Lower Laurentian
may have been the first rock ever formed ; and in any case it
is a rock formed under conditions which have not since re-
curred, except locally. It constitutes the first and best example
of those chemico-physical, aqueous or aqueo-igneous rocks,
so characteristic of the earliest period of the earth's history.
"\'iewed in this way the Lower Laurentian gneiss is probably
the oldest kind of rock we shall ever know — the limit to our
backward progress, beyond which there remains nothing to the
geologist except physical hypotheses respecting a cooling incan-
descent globe. For the chemical conditions of these primitive
rocks, and what is known as to their probable origin, I may
refer to the writings of my friends, the late Dr. Sterry Hunt and
Dr. J. G. Bonney, to whom we owe so much of what is known
of the older crystalline rocks^ as well as of their literature, and
the questions which they raise. My purpose here is to sketch
the remarkable difference which \vc meet as we ascend into the
Middle and Upper Laurentian.
In the next succeeding formation, the middle part of the
Laurentian of Logan, the Grenville series of Canada, we meet
with a great and significant change. It is true we have still a
predominance of gneisses which may have been formed in the
' Hunt, "Essays on Chemical Geology"; Bonney, "Addresses to
]5iilish Association and Geological Society of London."
WORLD-MAKING IQ
same manner with those below them ; but we find these now-
associated with great beds of limestone and dolomite, which
must have been formed by the separation of cnlcium and mag-
nesium carbonates from the sea water, either by chemical pre-
cipitation or by the agency of living beings. We have also
quartzite, quartzose gneisses, and even pebble beds, which in-
form us of sandbanks and shores. Nay, more, we have beds
containing graphite which must be the residue of plants, and
iron ores which tell of the deoxidation of iron oxide by organic
matters. In short, here we have evidence of new factors in
world-building, of land and ocean, of atmospheric decay of
rocks, of deoxidizing processes carried on by vegetable life on
the land and in the waters, of limestone-building in the sea.
To afford material for such rocks, the old Ottawa gneiss must
have been lifted up into continents and mountain masses by
bendings and foldings of the original crust. Under the slow
but sure action of the carbon dioxide dissolved in rainwater,
its felspar had crumbled down in the course of ages. Its
potash, soda, lime, magnesia, and part of its silica had been
washed into the sea, there to enter into new combinations
and to form new deposits. The crumbling residue of fine clay
and sand had been also washed down into the borders of the
ocean, and had been there deposited in beds. Thus the
earth had entered into a new phase, which continues onward
through the geological ages ; and I place in the reader's hands
one key for unlocking the mystery of the world in affirming
that this great change took place, this new era was inaugurated
in the midst of the Laurentian period, the oldest of our great
divisions of the earth's geological history.'
' I follow the original arrangement oi Logan, who first delintd lliis
succession in the extensive and excellent exposures of these rocks in Canada.
Klsewlicre the subject h.is often been confused and mixed with local de-
tails. The same facts, though sometimes under dilTerent names, are re-
corded by the geologists of Scandinavia, Britain, and the United States,
20 WORLD-MAKING
Was not this a fit period for the first appearance of life?
should we not expect it to appear, independently of the evidence
of the fact, so soon at least as the temperature of the ocean falls
sufficiently low to permit its existence ? ^ I do not propose to
enter here into that evidence. This we shall have occasion
to consider in the sequel. I would merely say here that
we should bear in mind that in this latter half of the Lower
Laurentian, or if we so choose to style it, Middle Laurentian
period, we have the conditions required for life in the sea
and on the land ; and since in other periods we know that life
was always present when its conditions were present, it is not
unreasonable to look for the earliest traces of life in this forma-
tion, in which we find, for the first time, the completion ot
those physical arrangements which make life, in such forms of
it as exist in the sea, possible.
This is also a proper place to say something of the disputed
doctrine of what is termed metamorphism, or the chemical
and molecular changes which old rocks have undergone.
The Laurentian rocks are undoubtedly greatly changed from
their original state, more especially in the matters of crystalli-
zation and the formation of disseminated minerals, by the action
of heat and heated water. .Sandstones have thus passed into
quartzites, clays into slates and schists, limestones into mar-
bles. So far, metamorphism is not a doubtful question ; but
when theories of metamorphism go so far as to suppose an
actual change of one element for another, they go beyond the
bounds of chemical credibility ; yet such theories of meta-
morphism are often boldly advanced and made the basis of
important conclusions. Dr. Hunt has happily given the name
" metasomatosis " to this imaginary and improbable kind of
and the acceptance of tlie conclusions of Nicol and Lapworlli lias served to
bring even the rocks of the Iliglilands of Scotland more into line with
those of Canada.
' Dana stales this al iSo ]•'. for plants and uo for animals.
WORLD-MAKING 21
metamorphism. I would have it to be understood that, in
speaking of the metamorphism of the older crystaUine rocks, it
is not to this metasomatosis that I refer, and that I hold that
rocks which have been produced out of the materials decom-
posed by atmospheric erosion can never by any process of
metamorphism be restored to the precise condition of the
Laurentian rocks. Thus, there is in the older formations a
genealogy of rocks, which, in the absence of fossils, may be
used with some confidence, but which does not apply to the
more modern deposits, and which gives a validity to the use of
mineral character in classifying older rocks which does not
hold for later formations. Still, nothing in geology abso-
lutely perishes, or is altogether discontinued ; and it is prob-
able that, down to the present day, the causes which produced
the old Laurentian gneiss may still operate in limited locali-
ties. Then, however, they were general, not exceptional. It is
further to be observed that the term gneiss is sometimes of wide
and even loose application. Beside the typical orthoclase and
hornblendic gneiss of the Laurentian, there are micaceous,
quartzose, garnetiferous and many other kinds of gneiss ; and
even gneissose rocks, which hold labradorite or anorthite in-
stead of orthoclase, are sometimes, though not accurately, in-
cluded in the term.
The Grenville series, or Middle Laurentian, is succeeded by
what Logan in Canada called the Upper Laurentian, and which
other geologists have called the Norite or Norian series. Here
we still have our old friends the gneisses, but somewhat peculiar
in type, and associated with them are great beds and masses, rich
in lime-felspar, the so-called labradorite and anorthite rocks.
The precise origin of these is uncertain, but this much seems
clear, namely, that they originated in circumstances in which
the great limestones deposited in the Lower or Middle Lauren-
tian were beginning to be employed in the manufacture, prob-
ably by a([ueo-igneous agencies, of iime-felspars. This proves
22 WORLD-MAKING
the Norian rocks to be younger than the Lower Laurentian, and
that, as Logan supposed, considerable earth movements had
occurred between the two, implying lapse of time, while it is
also evident that the folding and crumpling of the Lower Lau-
rentian had led to great outbursts of igneous matter from below
the crust, or from its under part.
•Next to the Laurentian, but probably after an interval, the
rocks of which are yet scarcely known, we have the Huronian
of Logan, a series much less crystalline and more fragmentary,
and affording more evidence of land elevation and atmo-
spheric and aqueous erosion than those preceding it. It has
extensive beds of volcanic rock, great conglomerates, some of
them made up of rounded fragments of Laurentian rocks, and
others of (juartz pebbles, which must have been the remains of
rocks subjected to very perfect decay. The pure quartz-rocks
tell the same tale, while slates and limestones speak also of
chemical separation of the materials of older rocks. The Hu-
ronian evidently tells of previous movements in the Lauren-
tian, and changes which allowed the Huronian to be deposited
along its shores and on the edges of its beds. Yet the Huronian
itself is older than the Palaeozoic series, and affected by power-
ful earth movements at an earlier date. Life existed in the
waters in LIuronian times. We have spicules of sponges in
the limestone, and organic markings on the slaty beds ; but
they are few, and their nature is uncertain.
Succeeding the Huronian, and made up of its dcbrii and
that of the Laurentian, we have the great Cambrian series,
that in which we first find undoubted evidence of abundant
marine life, and which thus forms the first chapter in the great
Palaeozoic book of the early history of the world. Here let it
be observed we have at least two wide gaps in our history,
marked by the crum])ling up, first, of the Laurentian, and then
of the Huronian beds.
After what has been said, the reader will perhaps nut be
WORLD-MAKING 23
astonished that fierce geological battles have raged over the
old crystalline rocks. By some geologists they are almost
entirely explained away, or referred to igneous action, or to the
alteration of ordinary sediments. Under the treatment of
another school they grow to great series of Pre-Cambrian
rocks, constituting vast systems of formations, distinguishable
from each other chiefly by differences of mineral character.
Facts and fossils are daily being discovered, by which these
disputes will ultimately be settled.
After the solitary appearance of Eozoon in the Laurentian,
and of a few uncertain forms in the Huronian, we find our-
selves, in the Cambrian, in the presence of a nearly complete
invertebrate fauna of protozoa, polyps, echinoderms, moUusks
and Crustacea, and this not confined to one locality merely,
but apparently extended simultaneously throughout the ocean,
over the whole world. This sudden incoming of animal life,
along with the subsequent introduction of successive groups of
invertebrates, and finally of vertebrate animals, furnishes one of
the greatest unsolved problems of geology, which geologists
were wont to settle by the supposition of successive creations.
In the sequel I shall endeavour to set forth the facts as to this
succession, and the general principles involved in it, and to
show the insufficiency of certain theories of evolution suggested
by biologists to give any substantial aid to the geologist in
these questions. At present I propose merely to notice some
of the general principles which should guide us in studying the
development of life in geological time, and the causes which
have baffled so many attempts to throw light on this obscure
portion of our unsolved problems.
It has been urged on the side ot rational evolution— and
there are both rational and irrational forms of this many-sided
doctrine — that this hypothesis does not profess to give an
explanation of the absolute origin of life on our planet, or even
of the original organization of a single cell, or of a simple mass
24 WORLD-MAKING
of protoplasm, living or dead. All experimental attempts to
produce by synthesis the complex albuminous substances, or to
obtain the living from the non-living, have so far been fruitless,
and indeed we cannot imagine any process by which such
changes could be effected. That they have been effected we
know, but the process employed by their maker is still as
mysterious to us as it probably was to him who wrote the
words : — " And God said, Let the waters swarm with swarmers."
How vast is the gap in our knowledge and our practical power
implied in this admission, which must, however, be made by
every mind not absolutely blinded by a superstitious belief in
those forms of words which too often pass current as
philosophy.
But if we are content to start with a number of organisms
ready made — a somewhat humiliating start, however — we still
have to ask — How do these vary so as to give new species ?
It is a singular illusion, and especially in the case of men who
I)rofess to be believers in natural law, that variation may be
boundless, aimless and fortuitous, and that it is by spontaneous
selection from varieties thus produced that development arises.
But surely the supposition of mere chance and magic is un-
worthy of science. Varieties must have causes, and their
causes and their effects must be regulated by some law or laws.
Now it is easy to see that they cannot be caused by a mere
innate tendency in the organism itself. Every organism is so
nicely equilibrated that it has no such spontaneous tendency,
except within the limits set by its growth and the law of its
}>eriodical changes. There may, however, be equilibrium
more or less stable. I believe all attempts hitherto made have
failed to account for the fixity of certain, nay, of very many,
types throughout geological time, but the mere consideration
that one may be in a more stable state of equilibrium than
another, so far explains it. A rocking stone has no more
spontaneous tendency to move than an ordinary boulder, hut
WORLD-MAKING 2$
it may be made to move with a touch. So it probably is with
organisms. But if so, then the causes of variation are external,
as in many cases we actually know them to be, and they must
depend on instability with change in surroundings, and this so
arranged as not to be too extreme in amount, and to operate
in some determinate direction. Observe how remarkable the
unity of the adjustments involved in such a supposition ! —
how superior they must be to our rude and always more or less
unsuccessful attempts to produce and carry forward varieties
and races in definite directions ! This cannot be chance. If
it exists, it must depend on plans deeply laid in the nature of
things, else it would be most monstrous magic and causeless
miracle. Still more certain is this conclusion when we con-
sider the vast and orderly succession made known to us by
geology, and which must have been regulated by fixed laws,
only a few of which are as yet known to us.
Beyond these general considerations we have others of a
more special character, based on palceontological facts, which
show how imperfect are our attempts as yet to reach the true
causes of the introduction of genera and species.
One is the remarkable fixity of the leading types of living
beings in geological time. If, instead of framing, like Haeckel,
fanciful phylogenies, we take the trouble, with Barrande and
Gaudry, to trace the forms of life through the period of their
existence, each along its own line, we shall be greatly struck
with this, and especially with the continuous existence of many
low types of life through vicissitudes of physical conditions of
the most stupendous character, and over a lapse of time
scarcely conceivable. What is still more remarkable is that
this holds in groups which, within certain limits, are perhaps
the most variable of all. In the present world no creatures
are individually more variable than the protozoa ; as, for
example, the foraminifera and the sponges. Yet these groups
are fundamentally the same, from the beginning of the Palceo-
26 WORLD-MAKING
zoic until now, and modern species seem scarcely at all to
differ from specimens procured from rocks at least half-way
back to the beginning of our geological record. If we suppose
that the present sponges and foraniinifera are the descendants
of those of the Silurian period, we can affirm that in all that
vast lapse of time they have, on the whole, made little greater
change than that which may be observed in variable forms at
present. The same remark applies to other low animal forms.
In types somewhat higher and less variable, this is almost
equally noteworthy. The pattern of the venation of the wings
of cockroaches, and the structure and form of land snails,
gally-worms and decapod crustaceans were all settled in the
('arboniferous age, in a way that still remains. So were the
foliage and the fructification of club-mosses and ferns. If, at
any time, members of these groups branched off, so as to lay
the foundation of new species, this must have been a very rare
and exceptional occurrence, and one demanding even some
suspension of the ordinary laws of nature.
We may perhaps be content on this question to say with
Gaudry,^ that it is not yet possible to " pierce the mystery that
surrounds the development of the great classes of animals," or
with Prof. Williamson,- that in reference to fossil plants " the
time has not yet arrived fur the appointment of a botanical
King-at-arms and Constructor of pedigrees." A\'c shall, how-
ever, find that by abandoning mere hypothetical causes and
carefully noting the order of the development and the causes
in operation, so far as known, we may reach to ideas as to cause
and mode, and the laws of succession, even if unable to pene-
trate the mystery of origins.
.\nother caution which a pakieontologist has occasion to give
with regard to theories of life, has reference to the tendency of
biologists to infer that animals and plants were iiitrodiiced
' " EnchaiiiemciUs dii Moiule Animal,'' Paris, 1SS3.
- Address before Royal Institution, Feb., 18S3.
WORLD-MAKING 2/
under embryonic forms, and at first in few and imperfect
species. Facts do not substantiate this. The first appearance
of leading types of life is rarely embryonic, or of the nature of
immature individuals. On the contrary, they often appear in
highly perfect and specialized forms, often, however, of compo-
site type and expressing characters afterwards so separated as
to belong to higher groups. The trilobites of the Cambrian are
some of them of few segments, and so far embryonic, but the
greater part are many-segmented and very complex. The
batrachians of the Carboniferous present many characters higher
than those of their modern successors and now appropriated
to the true reptiles. The reptiles of the Permian and Trias
usurped some of the prerogatives of the mammals. The ferns,
lycopods and equisetums of the Devonian and Carboniferous
were, in fructification, not inferior to their modern representa-
tives, and in the structure of their stems" far superior. The
shell-bearing cephalopods of the Paleeozoic would seem to
have possessed structures now special to a higher group, that
of the cuttle-fishes. The bald and contemptuous negation of
these facts by Haeckel and other biologists does not tend to
give geologists much confidence in their dicta.
Again, we are now prepared to say that the struggle for
existence, however plausible as a theory, when put before us in
connection with the productiveness of animals and the few
survivors of their multitudinous progeny, has not been the
determining cause of the introduction of new species. The
periods of rapid introduction of new forms of marine life were
not periods of struggle, but of expansion — those periods in
which the submergence of continents afforded new and large
space for their extension and comfortable subsistence. In like
manner, it was continental emergence that afforded the oppor-
tunity for the introduction of land animals and plants. Fur-
ther, in connection with this, it is now an established conclusion
tliat the great aggressive faunas and floras of the continents
28 WORLD-MAKING
have originated in the north, some of them within the arctic
circle, and this in periods of exceptional warmth, when the
perpetual summer sunshine of the arctic regions coexisted with
a warm temperature. The testimony of the rocks thus is that
not struggle but expansion furnished the requisite conditions
for new forms of life, and that the periods of struggle were
characterized by depauperation and extinction.
But we are sometimes told that organisms are merely
mechanical, and that the discussions respecting their origin
have no significance any more than if they related to rocks or
crystals, because they relate merely to the organism considered
as a machine, and not to that which may be supposed to be
more important, namely, the great determining power of mind
and will. That this is a mere evasion by which we really gain
nothing, will appear from a characteristic extract of an article
by an eminent biologist in the new edition of the Encyclopedia
Britannica, a publication which, I am sorry to say, instead of
its proper role as a repertory of facts, has admitted partisan
papers, stating extreme and unproved speculations as if they
were conclusions of science. The statement referred to is as
follows : — "A mass of living protoplasm is simply a molecular
machine of great complexity, the total results of the working of
which, or its vital phenomena, depend on the one hand on its
construction, and on the other, on the energy supplied to it ;
and to speak of vitality as anything but the name for a series
of operations is as if one should talk of the horologity of a
clock." It would, I think, scarcely be possible to put into
the same number of words a greater amount of unscientific
assumption and unproved statement than in this sentence. Is
" living proto[)lasm " different in anyway from dead protoplasm,
and if so, what causes the difference ? What is a " machine "?
Can we conceive of a self-produced or uncaused machine, or
one not intended to work out some definite results ? The results
of the machine in question are said to be " vital phenomena '" ;
WORLD-MAKING 29
certainly most wonderful results, and greater than those of any
machine man has yet been able to construct. But why " vital " ?
If there is no such thing as life, surely they are merely physical
results. Can mechanical causes produce other than physical
effects ? To Aristotle life was " the cause of form in organ-
isms." Is not this quite as likely to be true as the converse pro-
position ? If the vital phenomena depend on the " construction "
of the machine, and the "energy supplied to it," whence this
construction and whence this energy ? The illustration of the
clock does not help us to answer this question. The construc-
tion of the clock depends on its maker, and its energy is de-
rived from the hand that winds it up. If we can think of a
clock which no one has made, and which no one winds, a clock
constructed by chance, set in harmony with the universe by
chance, wound up periodically by chance, we shall then have
an idea parallel to that of an organism living, yet without any
vital energy or creative law ; but in such a case we should
certainly have to assume some antecedent cause, whether we
call it "horologity " or by some other name. Perhaps the term
evolution would serve as well as any other, were it not that
common sense teaches that nothing can be spontaneously
evolved out of that in which it did not previously exist.
There is one other unsolved problem in the study of life by
the geologist to which it is still necessary to advert. This is
the inability of palaeontology to fill up the gaps in the chain of
being. In this respect we are constantly taunted with the im-
perfection of the record, a matter so important that it merits a
separate treatment ; but facts show that this is much more
complete than is generally supposed. Over long periods of
time and many lines of being we have a nearly continuous
chain, and if this does not show the tendency desired, the
fault is as likely to be in the theory as in the record. On the
other hand, the abrupt and simultaneous appearance of new
types in many specific and generic forms and over wide and
30 WORLU-MAKIXG
separate areas at one and the same time, is too often repeated
to be accidental. Hence palaeontologists, in endeavouring to
establish evolution, have been obliged to assume periods of
exceptional activity in the introduction of species, alternating
\vith others of stagnation, a doctrine differing very little from
that of special creation, as held by the older geologists.
The attempt has lately been made to account for these breaks
by the assumption that the geological record relates only to
periods of submergence, and gives no information as to those of
elevation. This is manifestly untrue. In so far as marine life
is concerned, the periods of submergence are those in which
new forms abound for very obvious reasons, already hinted ; but
the periods of new forms of land and fresh-water life are those
of elevation, and these have their own records and monuments,
often very rich and ample, as, for example, the swamps of the
Carboniferous, the transition from the great Cretaceous sub-
sidence, when so much of the land of the Northern Hemisphere
was submerged, to the new continents of the Tertiary, the
Tertiary lake-basins of Western America, the Terraces and
raised beaches of the Pleistocene. Had I time to refer in
detail to the breaks in the continuity of life which cannot be
explained by the imperfection of the record, I could show at
least that nature in this case does advance per saltuin — by
leaps, rather than by a slow continuous process. Many able
reasoners, as Le Conte, in America, and Mivart and CoUard in
England, hold this view.
Here, as elsewhere, a vast amount of steady conscientious
work is required to enable us to solve the problems of the
history of life. But if so, the more the hope for the patient
student and investigator. I know nothing more chilling to re-
search, or unfavourable to progress, than the promulgation of
a dogmatic decision that there is nothing to be learned but a
merely fortuitous and uncaused succession, amenable to no
law, and only to be covered, in order to hide its shapeless and
WORLD-MAKING 31
uncertain proportions, by the mantle of bold and gratuitous
hypothesis.
So soon as we find evidence of continents and oceans we
raise the question, Have those continents existed from the first
in their present position and form, or have the land and water
changed places in the course of geological time? This ques-
tion also deserves a separate and more detailed consideration.
In reality both statements are true in a certain limited sense.
On the one hand, any geological map whatever suffices to show
that the general outline of the existing land began to be formed
in the first and oldest crumplings of the crust. On the other
hand, the greater part of the surface of the land consists of
marine sediments which must have been deposited when the
continents were in great part submerged, and whose materials
must have been derived from land that has perished in the
process, while all the continental surfaces, except, perhaps, some
high peaks and ridges, have been many times submerged.
Both of these apparently contradictory statements are true ; and
without assuming both, it is impossible to explain the existing
contours and reliefs of the surface.
In exceptional cases even portions of deep sea have been
elevated, as in the case of the Polycistine deposits in the West
Indies ; but these exceptions are as yet scarcely sufficient to
prove the rule.
In the case of North America, the form of the old nucleus of
Laurentian rock in the north already marks out that of the
finished continent, and the successive later formations have
been laid upon the edges of this, like the successive loads of
earth dumped over an embankment. But in order to give the
great thickness of the Palaeozoic sediments, the land must ha\e
been again and again submerged, and for long periods of time.
Thus, in one sense, the continents have been fixed ; in another,
they have been constandy fluctuating. Hall and Dana have
well illustrated these points in so far as eastern North America
s. E. 3
WORLD-MAKING
is concerned. Prof. Hull of the Geological Survey of Ireland
has had the boldness to reduce the fluctuations of land and
water, as evidenced in the British Islands, to the form of a
series of maps intended to show the physical geography of each
successive period. The attempt is probably premature, and
has been met with much adverse criticism ; but there can be no
doubt that it has an element of truth. When we attempt to
calculate what could have been supplied from the old Eozoic
nucleus by decay and aqueous erosion, and when we take into
account the greater local thickness of sediments towards the
present sea-basins, we can scarcely avoid the conclusion that
extensive areas once occupied by high land are now under the
sea. But to ascertain the precise areas and position of these
perished lands may now be impossible.
In point of fact we are obliged to believe in the contempo-
raneous existence in all geological periods, except perhaps the
very oldest, of three sorts of areas on the surface of the earth :
(i) Oceanic areas of deep sea, which must always have oc-
cupied the bed of the present ocean, or parts of it ; (2) Conti-
nental plateaus sometimes existing as low flats, or as higher
table-lands, and sometimes submerged ; (3) Areas of plication
or folding, more especially along the borders of the oceans,
forming elevated lands rarely submerged and constantly afford-
ing the material of sedimentary accumulations. We shall find,
however, that these have changed places in a remarkable man-
ner, though always in such a way that neither the life of the
land nor of the waters was wholly extinguished in the process.
luery geologist knows the contention which has been
occasioned by the attempts to correlate the earlier Palaeozoic
deposits of the Atlantic margin of North America with those
forming at the same time on ihe interior plateau, and with
those of intervening lines of plication and igneous disturbance.
Stratigraphy, lithology and fossils are all more or less at fault
in dealing with these questions, and while the general nature
WORLD-MAKING 33
of the problem is understood by many geologists, its solution
in particular cases is still a source of apparently endless
debate.
The causes and mode of operation of the great movements
of the earth's crust which have produced mountains, plains
and table-lands, are still involved in some mystery. One
patent cause is the unequal settling of the crust towards the
centre ; but it is not so generally understood as it should be,
that the greater settlement of the ocean-bed has necessitated
its pressure against the sides of the continents in the same
manner that a huge ice-floe crushes a ship or a pier. The
geological map of North America shows this at a glance, and
impresses us with the fact that large portions of the earth's
crust have not only been folded but bodily pushed back for
great distances. On looking at the extreme north, we see that
the great Laurentian mass of central Newfoundland has acted
as a projecting pier to the space immediately west of it, and
has caused the gulf of St. Lawrence to remain an undisturbed
area since Palaeozoic times. Immediately to the south of this,
Nova Scotia and New Brunswick are folded back. Still farther
south, as Guyot has shown, the old sediments have been
crushed in sharp folds against the Adirondack mass, which has
sheltered the table-land of the Catskills and of the great lakes.
South of this again the rocks of Pennsylvania and Maryland
have been driven back in a great curve to the west. Move-
ments of this kind on the Pacific coast of America have been
still more stupendous, as well as more recent. Dr. G. M.
Dawson ^ thus refers to the crushing action of the Pacific bed
on the rocks of British Columbia, and this especially at two
periods, the close of the Triassic and the close of the Cretace-
ous : " The successive foldings and crushings which the Cor-
dillera region has suffered have resulted in an actual change
of position of the rocks now composing its western margin.
' Trans. Royal Society of Canada, 1S90.
34 WORLD-MAKING
This change may have amounted since the beginning of
Mesozoic time to one-third of its whole present width, which
would place the line of the coast ranges about two degrees of
longitude farther west." Here we have evidence that a tract
of country 400 miles wide and consisting largely of mountain
ranges and table-lands, has been crushed bodily back over two
degrees of longitude ; and this applies not to British Columbia
merely, but to the whole west coast from Alaska to Chili.
Yet we know that any contraction of the earth's nucleus can
crumple up only a very thin superficial crust, which in this
case must have slid over the pasty mass below. ^ Let it
be observed, however, that the whole lateral pressure of vast
areas has been condensed into very narrow lines. Nothing, I
think, can more forcibly show the enormous pressure to which
the edges of the continents have been exposed, and at the
same time the great sinking of the hard and resisting ocean-
beds. Complex and difficult to calculate though these move-
ments of plication are, they are more intelligible than the
apparently regular pulsations of the flat continental areas,
whereby they have alternately been below and above the
waters, and which must have depended on somewhat regularly
recurring causes, connected either with the secular cooling of
the earth or with the gradual retardation of its rotation, or with
both. There is, however, good reason to believe that the suc-
cessive subsidences alternated with the movements of plication,
and depended on upward bandings of the ocean floor, and
also on the gradual slackening of the rotation of the earth.
Throughout these changes, each successive elevation exposed
the rocks for long ages to the decomposing influence of the
atmosphere. Each submergence swept away and deposited as
' This view is quite consistent with the practical solidity of the earth,
and with the action of local expansion by heat, of settlement of areas
overloaded with sediment, and of primitive or downward sliding of beds.
This we shall see in the sequel.
WORLD-MAKING 35
sediment the material accumulated by decay. Every change
of elevation was accompanied with changes of climate, and
with modifications of the habitats of animals and plants.
Were it possible to restore accurately the physical geography
of the earth in all these respects, for each geological period,
the data for the solution of many difficult questions would l>e
furnished.
We have wandered through space and time sufficiently for
one chapter, and some of the same topics must come up later
in other connections. Let us sum up in a word. In human
history we are dealing with the short lives and limited plans of
man. In the making of worlds we are conversant with the
plans of a Creator with whom one day is as a thousand years,
and a thousand years as one day. ^^'e must not measure such
things by our microscopic scale of time. Nor should we fail
to see that vast though the ages of the earth are, they are parts
of a continuous plan, and of a plan probably reaching in space
and time immeasurably beyond our earth. When we trace the
long history from an incandescent fire-mist to a finished earth,
and vast ages occupied by the dynasties of plant and animal
life, we see not merely a mighty maze, an almost endless pro-
cession of changes, but that all of these were related to one
another by a chain of causes and effects leading onward to
greater variety and complexity, while retaining throughout the
traces of the means employed. The old rocks and the ancient
lines of folding and the perished forms of life are not merely a
scaffolding set up to be thrown down, but the foundation
stones of a great and symmetrical structure. Is it yet com-
pleted ? Who can tell ? The earth may still be young, and
infinite ages of a better history may lie before it.
Rki EKENXES ' : Presidential Address to the American Association for the
Advancement of Science, meeting at Minneapolis, 1S83. "The
Story of the Earth and Man." Nintli edition, London, 1887.
^ The references in this and succeeding chapters are exclusively to papers
and works by tlie author, on which the several chapters are based.
THE IMPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL
RECORD.
DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF
JOACHIN BARRANDE,
One of the most successful Labourers
IN THE
Completion of the History of Life
in its earlier stages.
Nature of the Imperfection — Questions as to its
ARISING from Want of Continuity, from Lack of
Preservation, from Imperfect Collecting. Ex-
amples— Land Snails, CARnoNiFEROus Batrachians,
Paleozoic Sponges, Pleistocene Shells, Devonian
and Cardoniferous Plants — ■ Comparative Perfec-
tion IN the Case of Marine Shells, etc. — Possible
Camhrian Scjuids — Questions as to A\'ant of First
Chapters of thi: Rf.coki) Pracikai. Conclusions
/
CHAPTER III.
THE IMPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL
RECORD.
COMPLAINTS of the imperfection of the geological
record are rife among those biologists who expect to
find continuous series of fossils representing the gradual trans-
mutation of species. No doubt these gaps are in some cases
portentous, and unfortunately they often occur just where it is
most essential to certain general conclusions that they should
be filled up. Instead, however, of making vague lamentations
on the subject, it is well to inquire to what causes these gaps
may be due, to what extent they invalidate the completeness
of geological history for scientific purposes, and how they may
best be filled.
Here we may first remark that it is not so much the physical
record of geology that is imperfect as the organic record. Ever
since the time of Hutton and Playfair we have learned that
the processes of mineral detrition and deposition are contin-
uous, and have been so throughout geological time. The
erosion of the land is constantly going on, every shower carries
its tribute of earthy matter toward the sea, and every wave
that strikes against a beach or cliff does some work toward
the grinding of shells, pebbles or stone. Thus, everywhere
around our continents there is a continuous deposition of beds
of earthy matter, and it is this which, when elevated into new
land, has given us our chronological series of geological forma-
tions. True, the elevating process is not continuous, but, so
40 IMPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD
far as we know, intermittent ; but it has been so often repeated
that we have no reason to doubt that the wasting continents
afford a complete series of aqueous deposits, since the time
when the dry land first appeared.
In recent years the Challenger expedition and similar dredg-
ings have informed us of still another continuity of deposition
in the depths of the ocean. There, where no detritus from
the land, or only a very little fine volcanic ash or pumice has
ever reached, we have, going on from age to age, a deposit of
the hard parts of abyssal animals and of those that swim in
the open sea ; so that if it were possible to bore or sink a shaft
in some parts of the ocean, we should find not only a continu-
ous bed, but a continuous series of pelagic life from the
Laurentian to the present day. Thus we have continuous
physical records, could we but reach or completely put them
together, and eliminate the disturbing influence of merely local
vicissitudes. It is when we begin to search the geological
formations for fossils, that imperfection in our record first
becomes painfully manifest.
In tlic case of many groups of marine animals, as, for
example, the shell-fish and the corals, and I may add the
l)ivalve crustaceans, so admirably worked up by my friend
Prof. Rupert Jones, we have very complete series. "With the
land snails the case is altogether different. As stated in an-
other paper of this series, a few species of these animals appear
in the later PaLxozoic age, and after that they have no suc-
cessors known to us in all the great periods covered by the
Permian, the Trias, and the earlier Jurassic. A few air-breath-
ing water-snails appear in the upper Jurassic, and true land
snails are not met with again until the Tertiary, ^\'ere there
no land snails in this vast la[)se of time? Have we two suc-
cessive creations, so to speak, of these creatures at distant
intervals ? ^^'ere they only diminished in numbers and distri-
bution in the intervening time? Is the hiatus owing merely
IMPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD 4 1
to the unlikelihood of such shells being preserved? Or is it
owing to the lack of diligence and care in collecting?
In this particular case we are, no doubt, disposed to say
that the series must have been continuous. But we cannot
be sure of this. In whatever way a few species of land snails
were so early introduced in the time of the Devonian or of
the Coal formation, if from physical vicissitudes or lack of
proper pabulum they became extinct, there is no reason known
to us why, when circumstances again became favourable, they
should not be reintroduced in the same manner as at first,
whether by development from allied types or otherwise. The
fact that the few Devonian and Carboniferous species are very
like those that still exist, perhaps makes against this supposition,
but does not exclude it. If we suppose that new forms of life
of low grade are introduced from time to time in the course
of the geological ages, and if we adopt the Darwinian hypo-
thesis of evolution, we arrive, as Naegeli has so well pointed
out, at the strange paradox, that the highest forms of life must
be the oldest of all, since they will be the descendants of the
earliest of the lower animals, whereas the animals now of low
grade may have been introduced later, and may not have had
time to improve. But all our attempts to reduce nature to
one philosophic expression necessarily lead to such paradoxes.
On the other hand, the chances of the preservation of land
snails in aqueous deposits are vastly less than those in favour
of the preservation of aquatic species. The first Carboniferous
species found ^ had been preserved in the very exceptional
circumstances afforded by the existence of hollow trunks of
Sigillariae on the borders of the Coal formation flats, and the
others subsequently found were in beds no doubt receiving
the drainage of neighbouring land areas. Still it is not un-
common on the modern sea-shore, anywhere near the mouths
of rivers, to find a few freshwater shells here and there. The
' Pupa vetusta of the Nova Scotia coal formation.
42 IMPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD
carbonaceous beds of the Trias, the fossil soils of the Portland
series, the estuarine Wealden beds would seem to be as favour-
ably situated as those of the coal formation for preserving land
shells, though possibly the flora of the Mesozoic was less suit-
able for feeding such creatures than that of the Coal period,
and they may consequently have become few and local. After
all, perhaps more diligent collecting and more numerous col-
lectors might succeed, and may succeed in the future, in filling
this and similar gaps.
It is a great mistake to suppose that discoveries of this kind
are made by chance. It is only by the careful and painstaking
examination of much material that the gaps in the geological
record can be filled up, and I propose in the sequel of this
article to note a few instances, in a country where the range
of territory is altogether out of proportion to the number of
observers, and which have come within my own knowledge.
It was not altogether by accident that Sir C. Lyell and the
writer discovered a few reptilian bones and a land snail in
breaking up portions of the material filling an erect Sigillaria
in the South Joggins coal measures. We were engaged in a
deliberate survey of the section, to ascertain as far as might
be the conditions of accumulation of coal, and one point
which occurred to us was to inquire as to the circumstances
of preservation of stumps of forest trees in an erect position,
to trace their roots into the soils on which they stood, and to
ascertain the circumstances in which they had been buried,
had decayed, and had been filled with mineral matter. It was
in questioning these erect trees on such subjects — and this not
without some digging and hammering — that we made the dis-
covery referred to.
But we found such remains only in one tree, and they were
very imperfect, and indicated only two species of batrachians
and one land snail. There the discovery might have rested.
But I undertook to follow it up. In successive visits to the
I.\JPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD 43
coast, a large number of trees standing in the cliff and reefs,
or fallen to the shore, were broken up and examined, the
result being to discover that, with one unimportant exception,
the productive trees were confined to one of the beds at Coal
Mine Point, that from which the original specimens had been
obtained. Attention was accordingly concentrated on this,
and as many as thirty trees were at different times extracted
from it, of which rather more than one-half proved more or
less productive. By these means bones representing about
sixty specimens and twelve species were extracted, besides
numerous remains of land shells, millipedes, and scorpions.
In this way a very complete idea was obtamed of the land life,
or at least of the smaller land animals, of this portion of the
coal formation of Nova Scotia. It is not too much to say that
if similar repositories could be found in the succeeding forma-
tions, and properly worked when found, our record of the
history of land quadrupeds might be made very complete.
When in 1855 I changed my residence from Nova Scotia to
Montreal, and so was removed to some distance from the
carboniferous rocks which I had been accustomed to study, I
naturally felt somewhat out of place in a Cambro-Silurian dis-
trict, more especially as my friend Billings had already almost
exhausted its fossils. I found, however, a congenial field in
the Pleistocene shell beds ; more especially as I had given
some attention to recent marine animals when on the sea coast.
The very perfect series of Pleistocene deposits in the St.
Lawrence valley locally contain marine shells from the bottom
of the till or boulder clay up to the overlying sands and gravels.
The assemblage was a more boreal one than that on the coast
of Nova Scotia, though many of the species were the same,
and both the climatal and bathymetrial conditions differed in
different parts of the Pleistocene beds themselves. The gap
in the record here could at that time be filled up only by col-
lecting recent shells. In addition to what could be obtained
44 IMPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD
by exchanging with naturahsts who had collected in Greenland,
Labrador, and Norway, I employed myself, summer after
summer, in dredging both on the south and north shore of
the St. Lawrence, until able at length to discover in a living
state, but under different conditions as to temperature and
depth, nearly every species found in the beds on the land,
from the lower boulder clay to the top of the formation, and
from the sea-level to the beds six hundred feet high on the
hills. Not only so : 1 could ascertain in certain places and
conditions all the peculiar varieties of the species, and the
special modes of life which tliey indicated. Thus, in the cases
of the Peter Redpath Museum, and in notes on the Post-
pliocene of Canada, the gap between the Modern and the
Glacial age was completely filled up in so far as Canadian
marine species are concerned. The net result was, as I have
elsewhere stated, that no change other than varietal had
occurred.
In studying the fossil plants of the Carboniferous, so abundant
in the fine exposures of the coal formation in Nova Scotia,
two defects struck me painfully. One was the fragmentary
and imperfect state of the specimens procurable. Another
was the question. What preceded these plants in the older
rocks ? The first of these was to be met only by thorough
exploration. When a fragment of a plant was disclosed it was
necessary to inquire if more existed in the same bed, and to
dig, or blast away or break up the rock, until some remaining
portions were disclosed. In this way it has been possible to
obtain entire specimens of many trees of the Carboniferous ;
and to such an extent has the laborious and somewhat costly
])rocess been effectual, that more species of carboniferous trees
are probably known in their entire forms from the Coal forma-
tions of Nova Scotia than from any other part of the world.
I have been amused to find that so little are experiences of
this kind known to some of my confreres abroad, that they
IMPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD 45
are disposed to look with scepticism on the information
obtained by this laborious but certain process, and to suppose
that they are being presented with imaginary *' restorations."
I think it right here to copy a remark of a German botanist,
who has felt himself called to criticise my work : " Dawson's
description of the genus {Fsi/ophyton) rests chiefly on the
impression made on him in his repeated researches," etc.
" He puts us off with an account of the general idea which he
has drawn from the study of them." This is the remark of a
closet naturalist, with reference to the kind of work above
referred to, which, of course, cannot be represented in its
entirety in figures or hand specimens.^
As to the precursors of the Carboniferous flora, in default
of information already acquired, I proceeded to question the
Erian or Devonian rocks of Canada, in which Sir William
Logan had already found remains of plants which had not,
however, been studied or described. Laboriously coasting
along the cliffs of Gaspe and the Baie des Chaleurs, digging
into the sandstones of Eastern Maine, and studying the plants
collected by the New York Survey, I began to find that there
was a rich Devonian flora, and that, like that of the Carboni-
ferous, it presented different stages from the base to the summit
of the formation. But here a great advance was made in a
somewhat unexpected way. My then young friends, the late
Prof Hartt and Mr. Matthew, of St. John, had found a few
remains of plants in the Devonian, or at least pre-Carboniferous
beds of St. John, which were placed in my hands for descrip-
tion. They were so novel and curious that inquiry was stimu-
lated, and these gentlemen, with some friends of similar tastes,
explored the shales exposed in the reefs near St. John, and
when they found the more productive beds, broke them up by
1 Solms-Laubacli, " Fossil Botany." A pretentious book, which should
not have been translated into English without thorough revision and
correction.
S. E. 4
46 IMPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD
actual quarrying operations in such a way that they soon
obtained the richest Devonian plant collections ever known.
I think I may truly say that these young and enthusiastic
explorers worked the St. John plant-beds in a manner pre-
viously unexampled in the world. Their researches were not
only thus rewarded, but incidentally they discovered the first
known Devonian insects, which could not have been found
by a less painstaking process, and one of them discovered
what I believe to be the oldest known land shell. Still more,
their studies led to the separation from the Devonian beds of
the Underlying Cambrian slates, previously confounded with
them ; and this, followed up by the able and earnest work of
Mr. Matthew, has carried back our knowledge of the older
rocks in Canada several stages, or as far as the earliest
Cambrian previously known in Europe, but not before fully
recognised in America, and has discovered in these old rocks
the precursors of many forms of life not previously traced so
far back.
The moral of these statements of fact is that the imper-
fections of the record will yield only to patient and painstaking
work, and that much is in the power of local amateurs. I
would enforce this last statement by a reference to a little
research, in which I have happened to take part at a summer
resort on the Lower St. Lawrence, at which I have from time
to time spent a few restful vacation weeks. Little Metis is on
the Quebec Group of Sir William Logan, that peculiar local
representative of the lower part of the Cambro-Silurian and
Upper Cambrian formations which stretches along the soutli
side of the St. Lawrence all the way from Quebec to Cape
Rosier, near Gaspe, a distance of five hundred miles. This
great series of rocks is a jumble of deposits belonging at tliat
early time to the marginal area of what is now the American
continent, and indicating the action not merely of ordinary
causes of aqueous deposit, but of violent volcanic ejections,
IMPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD 47
accompanied perhaps by earthquake waves, and not improb-
ably by the action of heavy coast ice. The result is that mud
rocks now in the form of black, grey, and red shales and slates
alternate with thick and irregular beds of hard sandstone,
sometimes so coarse that it resembles the angular debris of the
first treatment of quartz in a crusher. With these sandstones
arc thick and still more irregular conglomerates formed of
pebbles and boulders of all sizes, up to several feet in diameter,
some of which are of older limestones containing Cambrian
fossils, while others are of quartzite or of igneous or volcanic
rocks.
The whole formation, as presented at Metis, is of the most
unpromising character as regards fossils, and after visiting the
place for ten years, and taking many long walks along the
shore and into the interior, and scrutinising every exposure, I
had found nothing more interesting than a few fragments of
graptolites, little zoophytes, ancient representatives of our sea
mosses, and which are quite characteristic of several portions
of the Quebec Group. With these were some marks of
fucoids and tracks or burrows of worms. The explorers of the
Geological Survey had been equally unsuccessful.
Quite accidentally a new light broke upon these unpromis-
ing rocks. My friend, Dr. Harrington, strolling one day on
the shore, sat down to rest on a stone, and picked up a piece
of black slate lying at his feet. He noticed on it some faintly
traced lines which seemed peculiar. He put it in his pocket
and showed it to me. On examination with a lens it proved
to have on it a few spicules of a hexactinellid sponge— little
crosses forming a sort of mesh or lattice-work similar to that
which Salter had many years before found in the Cambrian
rocks of Wales, and had named Protospongia — the first sjjonge.
The discovery seemed worth following up, and we took an
early opportunity of proceeding to the place, where, after some
search, we succeeded in tracing the loose pieces to a ledge of
48 IMPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD
shale on the beach, where there was a Uttle band, only about an
inch thick, stored with remains of sponges, a small bivalve shell
and a slender branching seaweed. This was one small layer
in reefs of slate more than one hundred feet thick. We sub-
sequently found two other thin layers, but less productive.
Tools and workmen were procured, and we proceeded to
quarry in the reef, taking out at low tide as large slabs as
possible of the most productive layer, and carefully splitting
these up. The results, as published in the Transactions of
the Royal Society of Canada,^ show more than twelve species
of siliceous sponges belonging to six genera, besides fragments
indicating other species, and all of these living at one time on
a very limited space of what is practically a single surface of
muddy sea-bottom.^ The specimens show the parts of these
ancient sponges much more perfectly than they were previously
known, and indeed, enable many of them to be perfectly re-
stored. They for the first time connect the modern siliceous
sponges of the deep sea with those that flourished on the old
sea-bottom of the early Cambro-Silurian, and thus bridge over
a great gap in the history of this low form of life, showing that
the principles of construction embodied in the remarkable
and beautiful siliceous sponges, like Euplectella, the " "\'enus
flower-basket," now dredged from the deep sea, were already
perfectly carried out in this far-back beginning of life. This
little discovery further indicates that portions of the older
PaUieozoic sea-bottoms were as well stored with a varied
sponge life as those of any part of the modern ocean. I
figure ^ a number of species, remains of all of which may be
gathered from a few yards of a single surfoce at Little Metis.
The multitude of interesting details embodied in all this it is
impossible to enter into here, but may be judged of from
' Aiiditioncil collections made in 1892 sliow two or three .idditional
species, one of them the type of a new and remarkable genus.
-' 1S89, section iv. p. 39. ' Frontispiece to chapter.
IMPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD 49
the forms reproduced. These examples tend to show that the
imperfection of the record may not depend on the record itself,
but on the incompleteness of our work. We must make large
allowance for imperfect collecting, and especially for the too
prevalent habit of remaining content with few and incomplete
specimens, and of grudging the time and labour necessary to
explore thoroughly the contents of special beds, and to work
out all the parts of forms found more or less in fragments.
The point of all this at present is that patient work is needed
to fill up the breaks in our record. A collector passing along
the shore at Metis might have picked up a fragment of a fossil
sj)onge, and recorded it as a fossil, or possibly described the
fragment. This fact alone would have been valuable, but to
make it bear its full fruit it was necessary to trace the fragment
to its source, and then to spend time and labour in extracting
from the stubborn rock the story it had to tell. Instances of
this kind crowd on my memory as coming within my own ex-
perience and observation. It is hopeful to think that the re-
cord is daily becoming less imperfect ; it is stimulating to
know that so much is only waiting for investigation. The his-
tory never can be absolutely complete. Practically, to us it is
infinite. \"et every series of facts known may be complete in
itself for certain purposes, however many gaps there may be
in the story. Even if we cannot find a continuous series be-
tv»-een the snails of the Coal formation or the sponges of the
(Quebec Group and their successors to-day, we can at least see
that they are identical in plan and structure, and can note the
differences of detail which fitted them for their places in the
ancient or the modern world. Nor need we be too discontented
if the order of succession, such as it is, does not exactly square
with some theories we may have formed. Perhaps it may in
the end lead us to greater and better truths.
Another subject which merits attention here is the evidence
which mere markings or other indications mav sometimes give
50 IMPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD
as to the existence of unknown creatures, and thus may be as
important to us as the footprints of Friday to Robinson Crusoe.
As I have been taking Canadian examples, I may borrow one
here from Mr. Matthew, of St. John, New Brunswick.
He remarks in one of his papers the manner in which the
Trilobites of the early Cambrian are protected with defensive
spines, and asks against what enemies they were intended to
guard. That there were enemies is further proved by the oc-
currence of Coprolites or masses of excrement, oval or cylin-
drical in form, and containing fragments of shells of Trilobites,
of Pteropods (Hyolithes) and of Lingula. There must there-
fore have been marine animals of considerable size, which
preyed on Trilobites. Dr. Hunt and myself have recorded
similar facts from the Upper-Cambrian and Canibro- Silurian
of the Province of Quebec. No remains, however, are known
of animals which could have produced such coprolites, except,
indeed, some of the larger worms of the period, and they seem
scarcely large enough. In these circumstances Mr. Matthew
falls back on certain curious marks or scratches with which
large surfaces of these old rocks are covered, and which he
names Ctenichnites or " Comb tracks." These markings
seem to indicate the rapid motion of some animal touching
the bottom with fins or other organs ; and as we know no fishes
in these old rocks, the question recurs, What could it have
been ? From the form and character of the markings Mr.
Matthew infers (i) That these animals lived in "schools," or
were social in their habits ; (2) That they had a rapid, direct,
darting motion ; (3) That they had three or four (at least)
flexible arms ; (4) That these arms were furnished with hooks
or spines; (5) That the creatures swam with an easy motion,
so that sometimes the arms of one side touched the bottom,
sometimes those of the other. These indications point to
animals allied to the modern scjuids or cuttlefishes, and as
these animals may have had no hard parts capable of pre-
IMPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD 5 1
servation, except their homy beaks, nothing might remain to
indicate their presence except these marks on the bottom.
Mr. Matthew therefore conjectures that there may have been
large cuttlefishes in the Cambrian. Since, however, these are
animals cf very high rank in their class, and are not certainly
known to us till a very much later period, their occurrence in
these old rocks would be a very remarkable and unexpected
fact.
A discovery made by Walcott in the Western States since
Mr. Matthew's paper was written, throws fresh light on the
question. Remains of fishes have been found by the
former in the Cambro Silurian rocks nearly as far back as
Mr. Matthew's comb-tracks. Besides this, Pander in Russia
has found in these old rocks curious teeth, which he refers
conjecturally to fishes (Conodonts). Why may there not have
been in the Cambrian large fishes having, like the modern
sharks, cartilage or gristle instead of bone — perhaps destitute
of scaler, and with small teeth which have not yet been de-
tected. The fin rays of such fishes may have left the comb
tracks, and in support of this I may say that there are in the
Lower Carboniferous of Horton Bluff, in Nova Scotia, very
similar tracks in beds holding many remains of fishes. Which-
ever view we adopt we see good evidence that there were in
the early Cambrian animals of higher grade than we have yet
dreamt of. Observe, however, that if we could complete the
record in this point it would only give us higher forms of life
at an earlier time, and so push farther back their possible
development from lower forms. I fear, indeed, that I can
hold out little hopes to the evolutionists that a more complete
geological record would help them in any way. It would
possibly only render their position more difficult.
But the saddest of all the possible defects of the geological
record is that it may want the beginning, and be like the
Bible of some of the German historical critics, from which they
52 IMPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD
eliminate as mythical everything before the time of the later
Hebrew kings. Our attention is forcibly called to this by the
condition of the fauna of the earliest Cambrian rocks. The
discoveries in these in Wales, in Norway, and in America show
us that the seas of this early period swarmed with animals re-
presenting all the great types of invertebrate marine life, ^^'e
have here highly organized Crustaceans, Worms, Mollusks and
other creatures which show us that in that early age all these
distinct forms of life were as well separated from each other
as in later times, that eyes of different types, jointed limbs
with nerves and muscles, and a vast variety of anatomical
contrivances were as highly developed as at any subsequent
time.^ To a Darwinian evolutionist this means nothing less
than that these creatures must have existed through countless
ages of development from their imagined simple ancestral
form or forms — how long it is impossible to guess, since, unless
change was more speedy in the infancy of the earth, the term
of ages required must have far exceeded that from the Cam-
brian to the Modern. Yet, to represent all this we have abso-
lutely nothing except Eozoon in its solitary grandeur, and a
* Walcott and Matthew record more than i6o species of 67 genera, in-
cluding Sponges, Zoophytes, Echinoderms, Brachiopods, Bivalve and
Univalve shellfishes, Trilobites and other Crustaceans from the Lower
Cambrian of the United States of America and Canada alone ; and these
are but a portion of the inhabitants of the early Cambrian seas. There is
a rich Scandinavian fauna of the same early date, and in England and
Wales, Sailer, Hicks and Lap worth have described many fossils of the
basal Cambrian. From year to year, also, discoveries of fossil remains are
being made, both in America and Europe, in beds of older date than those
previously known to be fossilifcrous. At present, however, these remains
are still few and imperfectly known, and it is not in all cases certain
whether the beds in which they occur are pre-Cambrian or belong to the
lowest members of that great system. It is unfortunate that so many
of the strata between the Laurentian and the Cambrian seem to be of a
character little likely to contain fossils ; being littoral deposits produced
in times of much physical disturbance. Yet there must have been con-
temporaneous beds of a different character, which may yet be discovered.
IMPERFECTION OF THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD 53
few other forms, possibly of Protozoa and worms. An im-
aginary phylogeny of animal life from Monads to Trilobites
would be something as long as the whole geological history.
Yet it would be almost wholly imaginary, for the record of the
rocks tells little or nothing. In face of such an imperfection
as til is, geologists should surely be humble, and make confes-
sion of ignorance to any extent that may be desired. Yet we
may at least, with all humility and self-abasement, ask our
critics how they know that this great blank really exists, and
whether it may not be possible that the swarming life of the
early Cambrian may, after all, have appeared suddenly on the
stage in some way as yet unknown to us and to them.
References : " Fossil Sponges from the Quebec Group of Little Metis,
Lower St. Lawrence": Transactions Royal Society of Canada, 1890.
"Resume of the Carboniferous Land Shells of North America":
American Journal of Science, 18S0. "Burrows and Tracks of In-
vertebrate Animals": Journal Geological Society of London, 1890.
"Notes on the Pleistocene of Canada" : Canadian A^aturalisf, 1876.
" Air-breathers of the Coal Paiod " : Ibid., 1863.
THE HISTORY OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC.
DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF
TROF. JOHN THIIXIPS,
OF OXFORD,
One of the most able, earnest, and genial of
Engllsh Geologists ;
and of other Eminent Scientific Men, now passed away,
who supported him as
President of the British Association, at its
Meeting in Birmingham, in 1865.
Distribution of Land and Water — Causes of Irregu-
larities OF THE Surface Crust and Interior —
Position of Continents — Past History of the
Atlantic — Its Relations to Life — Its Future
ma w-Ki LJt
VI
A'^
r
=" ^' J»-»^ .^-ng— .^— ^^■
CHAPTER IV.
THE HISTORY OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC.
I HAD the pleasure of being present at the meeting of the
British Association at Birmingham, in 1865 : a meeting
attended by an unusually large number of eminent geologists,
under the presidency of my friend Phillips. I had the further
pleasure of being his successor at the meeting in the same
place, in 1886; and the subject of this chapter is that to
which I directed the attention of the Association in my
Presidential address. I fear it is a feeble and imperfect utter-
ance compared with that which might have been given forth by
any of the great men present in 1865, and who have since left
us, could they have spoken with the added knowledge of the
intervening twenty years.
The geological history of the Atlantic appeared to be a
suitable subject for a trans-Atlantic president, and to a Society
which had vindicated its claim to be British in the widest
sense by holding a meeting in Canada, while it was also
meditating a visit to Australia — a visit not yet accomplished,
but in which it may now meet with a worthy daughter in the
Australian Association formed since the meeting of 1886. The
subject is also one carrying our thoughts very far back in
geological time, and connecting itself with some of the latest
and most important discussions and discoveries in the science
of the earth, furnishing, indeed, too many salient points to be
profitably occupied in a single chapter.
If we imagine an observer contemplating the earth from a
58 THE HISTORY OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC
convenient distance in space, and scrutinizing its features as it
rolls before him, we may suppose him to be struck with the
fact that eleven-sixteenths of its surface are covered with water,
and that the land is so unequally distributed that from one
point of view he would see a hemisphere almost exclusively
oceanic, while nearly the whole of the dry land is gathered in
the opposite hemisphere. He might observe that large portions
of the great oceanic areas of the Pacific and Antarctic Oceans
are dotted with islands — like a shallow pool with stones rising
above its surface — as if the general depth were small in com-
parison with the area. Other portions of these oceans he
might infer, from the colour of the water and the absence of
islands, cover deep depressions in the earth's surface. He
might also notice that a mass or belt of land surrounds each
pole, and that the northern ring sends off to the southward
three vast tongues of land and of mountain chains, terminating
respectively in South America, South Africa, and Australia,
towards which feebler and insular processes are given off by
the antarctic continental mass. This, as some geographers
have observed, ^ gives a rudely three-ribbed aspect to the earth,
though two of the ribs are crowded together, and form the
Eurasian mass or double continent, while the third is isolated
in the single continent of America. He might also observe
that the northern girdle is cut across, so that the Atlantic
opens by a wide space into the Arctic Sea, while the Pacific is
contracted toward the north, but confluent with the Antarctic
Ocean. The Atlantic is also relatively deeper and less cum-
bered with islands than the Pacific, which has the highest
ridges near its shores, constituting what some visitors to the
Pacific coast of America have not inaptly called the " back of
the world," while the wider slopes face the narrower ocean.
The Pacific and Atlantic, though both depressions or flat-
' Dana, " Manual of Geology," introcluclory part. Green, " Vestiges
of a Molten Globe," has summed up these facts.
THE HISTORY OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC 59
tenings of the earth, are, as we shall find, different in age,
character, and conditions; and the Atlantic, though the smaller,
is the older, and, from the geological point of view, in some
respects, the more important of the two ; while, by virtue of its
lower borders and gentler slope, it is, though the smaller basin,
the recipient of the greater rivers, and of a proportionately
great amount of the drainage of the land.^
If our imaginary observer had the means of knowing any-
thing of the rock formations of the continents, he would notice
that those bounding the North Atlantic are, in general, of
great age — some belonging to the Laurentian system. On the
other hand, he would see that many of the mountain ranges
along the Pacific are comparatively new, and that modern
igneous action occurs in connection with them. Thus he
might see in the Atlantic, though comparatively narrow, a
more ancient feature of the earth's surface ; while the Pacific
belongs to more modern times. But he would note, in con-
nection with this, that the oldest rocks of the great continental
masses are mostly toward their northern ends ; and that the
borders of the northern ring of land, and certain ridges en-
tending southward from it, constitute the most ancient and
permanent elevations of the earth's crust, though now greatly
surpassed by mountains of more recent age nearer the equator,
so that the continents of the northern hemisphere seem to
have grown progressively from north to south.
If the attention of our observer were directed to more
modern processes, he might notice that while the antarctic
continent freely discharges its burden of ice to the ocean north
of it, the arctic ice has fewer outlets, and that it mainly dis-
charges itself through the North Atlantic, where also the great
mass of Greenland stands as a huge condenser and cooler,
* Mr. Mellard Reade, in two Presidential addresses before the Geo-
logical Society of Liverpool, lias illustrated tliis point and its geological
consequences.
S. E. S
6o THE HISTORY OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC
unexampled elsewhere in the world, throwing every spring an
immense quantity of ice into the North Atlantic, and more
especially into its western part. On the other hand, he might
learn from the driftage of weed and the colour of the water,
that the present great continuous extension and form of the
American continent tend to throw northward a powerful branch
of the equatorial current, which, revolving around the North
Atlantic, counteracts the great flow of ice which otherwise
would condemn it to a perpetual winter.
Further, such an observer would not fail to notice that the
ridges which lie along the edges of the oceans and the ebul-
litions of igneous matter which proceed, or have proceeded
from them, are consequences of the settling downward of the
great oceanic depressions, a settling ever intensified by their
receiving more and more of deposit on their surfaces ; and
that this squeezing upward of the borders of these depressions
into folds has been followed or alternated with elevations and
depressions without any such folding, and proceeding from
other causes. On the whole, it would be apparent that these
actions are more vigorous now at the margins of the Pacific
area, while the Atlantic is backed by very old foldings, or by
plains and slopes from which it has, so to speak, dried away
without any internal movement. Thus it would appear that
the Pacific is the great centre of earth-movement, while the
Atlantic trench is the more potent regulator of temperature,
and the ocean most likely to be severely affected in this respect
by small changes of its neighbouring land. Last of all, an
observer, such as I have supposed, would see that the oceans
are the producers of moisture and the conveyors of heat to the
northern regions of the world, and that in this respect and in
the immense condensation and delivery of ice at its north end,
the Atlantic is by far the more active, though the smaller of
the two.
So much could be learned by an extra-mundane observer •
THE HISTORY OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC 6l
but unless he had also enjoyed opportunities of studying the
rocks of the earth in detail and close at hand, or had been
favoured by some mundane friend with a perusal of " Lyell's
Elements," or "Dana's Manual," he would not be able to ap-
preciate as we can the changes which the Atlantic has seen in
geological time, and in which it has been a main factor. Nor
could he learn from such superficial observation certain secrets
of the deep sea, which have been unveiled by the sounding
lead, the inequalities of the ocean basin, its few profound depths,
like inverted mountains or table-lands, its vast nearly flat
abyssmal floor, and the sudden rise of this to the hundred
fathom line, forming a terrace or shelf around the sides of
the continents. These features, roughly represented in the
map prefixed, he would be unable to perceive.
Before leaving this broad survey, we may make one further
remark. An observer, looking at the earth from without,
would notice that the margins of the Atlantic and the main
lines of direction of its mountain chains are north-east and
south-west, and north-west and south-east, as if some early
causes had determined the occurrence of elevations along
great circles of the earth's surface tangent to the polar circles.
We are invited by the preceding general glance at the surface
of the earth to ask certain questions respecting the Atlantic.
(i) What has at first determined its position and form? (2)
What changes has it experienced in the lapse of geological
time ? (3) What relations have these changes borne to the
development of life on the land and in the water? (4) ^^'hat
is its probable future ?
Before attempting to answer these questions, which I shall
not take up formally in succession, but rather in connection
with each other, it is necessary to state, as briefly as possible,
certain general conclusions respecting the interior of the earth.
It is popularly supposed that we know nothing of this beyond
a superficial crust perhaps averaging 50,000 to 100,000 feet in
62 THE HISTORY OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC
thickness. It is true we Inave no means of exploration in the
earth's interior, but the conjoined labours of physicists have
now proceeded sufficiently far to throw much inferential light
on the subject, and to enable us to make some general affirma-
tions with certainty ; and these it is the more necessary to
state distinctly, since they are often treated as mere subjects of
speculation and fruitless discussion.
(i) Since the dawn of geological science, it has been evi-
dent that the crust on which we live must be supported on a
plastic or partially liquid mass of heated rock, approximately
uniform in quality under the whole of its area. This is a
legitimate conclusion from the wide distribution of volcanic
phenomena, and from the fact that the ejections of volcanoes,
while locally of various kinds, are similar in every part of the
world. It led to the old idea of a fluid interior of the earth,
but this seems now generally abandoned, and this interior
heated and plastic layer is regarded as merely an under-crust,
resting on a solid nucleus. ^
(2) We have reason to believe, as the result of astronomical
investigations, 2 that, notwithstanding the plasticity or liquidity
of the under-crust, the mass of the earth — its nucleus as we
may call it — is practically solid and of great density and
hardness. Thus we have the apparent paradox of a solid yet
fluid earth ; solid in its astronomical relations, liquid or
' I do not propose to express any definite opinion as to this question, as
either conclusion will satisfy the demands of geology. It would seem,
however, that astronomers now admit a slight periodical deformation of
the crust. See Lord Kelvin's Anniversary Address to Royal Society,
1892.
- Hopkins, Mallet, Lord Kelvin, and Prof. G. II. Darwin maintain
the solidity and rigidity of the earth on astronomical grounds ; but different
conclusions have been reached by Fisher, Ilennesey, Delaunay, and Airy.
In America, Hunt, Barnard and Crosby, Dutton, Le Conte and Wadsworth
have discussed these questions. Bonney has suggested that a mass may be
slowly mobile under long-continued pressure, while rigid with reference to
more sudden movements.
THE HISTORY OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC 63
plastic for the purposes of volcanic action and superficial move-
ments.
(3) The plastic sub-crust is not in a state of dry igneous
fusion, but in that condition of aqueo-igneous or hydrothermic
fusion which arises from the action of heat on moist substances,
and which may either be regarded as a fusion or as a species
of solution at a very high temperature. This we learn from
the phenomena of volcanic action, and from the composition
of the volcanic and plutonic rocks, as well as from such
chemical experiments as those of Daubree, and of Tilden, and
Shenstone.^ It follows that water or steam, as well as rocky
matter, may be ejected from the under-crust.
(4) The interior sub-crust is not perfectly homogeneous, but
may be roughly divided into two layers or magmas, as they
have been called ; an upper, highly silicious or acidic, of low
specific gravity and light-coloured, and corresponding to such
kinds of plutonic and volcanic rocks as granite and trachyte ;
and a lower, less silicious or more basic, more dense, and
more highly charged with iron, and corresponding to such
igneous rocks as the dolerites, basalts, and kindred lavas. It
is interesting here to note that this conclusion, elaborated by
Durocher and Von Waltershausen, and usually connected with
their names, appears to have been first announced by John
Phillips, in his " (Geological Manual," and as a mere common-
sense deduction from the observed phenomena of volcanic
action and the probable results of the gradual cooling of the
earth. It receives striking confirmation from the observed
succession of acidic and basic volcanic rocks of all geological
periods and in all localities. It would even seem, from recent
spectroscopic investigations of Lockyer, that there is evidence
of a similar succession of magmas in the heavenly bodies, and
the discovery by Nordenskiold of native iron in Greenland
• Phil. Trans., 1SS4. Also Crosby in Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist.,
1883.
64 THE HISTORY OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC
basalts, affords a probability that the inner magma is in part
metallic, and possibly, that vast masses of unoxidised metals
exist in the central portion of the earth.
(5) Where rents or fissures form in the upper crust, the
material of the lower crust is forced upward by the pressure
of the less supported portions of the former, giving rise to
volcanic phenomena either of an explosive or quiet character,
as may be determined by contact with water. The underlying
material may also be carried to the surface by the agency of
heated water, producing those quiet discharges which Hunt
has named crenitic. It is to be observed here that explosive
volcanic phenomena, and the formation of cones, are, as
Prestwich has well remarked, characteristic of an old and
thickened crust ; quiet ejection from fissures and hydro-
thermal action may have been more common in earlier periods
and with a thinner over-crust. This is an important con-
sideration with reference to those earlier ages referred to in
chapter second.
(6) The contraction of the earth's interior by cooling and
by the emission of material from below the over-crust, has
caused this crust to press downward, and therefore laterally,
and so to effect great bends, folds, and plications ; and these,
modified subsequently by surface denudation, and the piling
of sediments on portions of the crust, constitute mountain
chains and continental plateaus. As Hall long ago pointed
out,^ such lines of folding have been produced more especially
where thick sediments had been laid down on the sea-bottom,
and where, in consequence, internal expansion of the crust had
occurred from heating below. Thus we have here another
apparent paradox, namely, that the elevations of the earth's
crust occur in the places where the greatest burden of de-
* Hall (American Association Address, 1S57, subsequently republislied,
with additions, as "Contributions to the Geological History of the American
Continent "), Mallet, Rogers, Dana, La Conte, etc.
THE HISTORY OF THE NORTH ATLAxXTIC 05
tritus has been laid down upon it, and where, consequently, the
crust has been softened and depressed. A\'e must beware, in
this connection, of exaggerated notions of the extent of con-
traction and of crumpling required to form mountains. Bonney
has well shown, in lectures delivered at the London Institu-
tion, that an amount of contraction, almost inappreciable in
comparison with the diameter of the earth, would be sufficient ;
and that, as the greatest mountain chains are less than -g^oth
of the earth's radius in height, they would, on an artificial
globe a foot in diameter, be no more important than the slight
inequalities that might result from the paper gores overlapping
each other at the edges. This thinness of the crushed crust
agrees with the deductions of physical science as to the
shallowness of the superficial layer of compression in a cooling
globe. It is perhaps not more than five miles in thickness.
A singular proof of this is seen by the extension of straight
cracks filled with volcanic rock in the Laurentian districts of
Canada. 1 The beds of gneiss and associated rocks are folded
and crumpled in a most complex manner, yet they are crossed
by these faults, as a crack in a board may tear a sheet of
paper or a thin veneer glued on it. We. thus see that the
crumpled Laurentian crust was very thin, while the uncrushed
sub-crust determined the line of fracture.
(7) The crushing and sliding of the over-crust implied in
these movements raise some serious questions of a physical
character. One of these relates to the rapidity or slowness
of such movements, and the consequent degree of intensity
of the heat developed, as a possible cause of metamorphism
of rocks. Another has reference to the possibihty of changes
in the equilibrium of the earth itself, as resulting from local
collapse and ridging. These questions in connection with the
* As, for instance, the great dyke running nearly in a straiglit line from
near .St. Jerome along the Ottawa to Templeton, on the Ottawa, and be-
yond, a distance of more than a hundred miles.
66 THE HISTORY OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC
present dissociation of the axis of rotation from the magnetic
poles, and with changes of chmate, have attracted some atten-
tion,^ and probably deserve further consideration on the part
of physicists. In so far as geological evidence is concerned,
it would seem that the general association of crumpling with
metamorphism indicates a certain rapidity in the process of
mountain-making, and consequent development of heat ; and
the arrangement of the older rocks around the Arctic basin for-
bids us from assuming any extensive movement of the axis of
rotation, though it does not exclude changes to a limited extent.
(8) It appears from the above that mountains and conti-
nental elevations may be of three kinds. (^7) They may con-
sist of material thrown out of volcanic rents, like earth out of
a mole burrow. Mountains like ^'esuvius and Aiina are of
this kind. (/^) They may be parts of wide ridges or chains
variously cut and modified by rains and rivers. The Lebanon
and the Catskill Mountains are cases in point, {c) They may
be lines of crumpling by lateral pressure. The greatest moun-
tains, like the Cordillera, the Alps, and the Appalachians are of
this kind, and such mountains may represent lateral pressure
occurring at various times, and whose results have been greatly
modified subsequently.
I wish to formulate tliese princi|)les as distinctly as possible,
and as the result of all the long series of observations, calcu-
lations, and discussions since the time of Werner and Hutlon,
and in which a vast number of able physicists and naturalists
have borne a part, because they may be considered as certain
deductions from our actual knowledge, and because they lie
at the foundation of a rational physical geology.
We may roughly popularise these deductions by comparing
the earth to a drupe or stone-fruit, sucli as a i)lum or peach
' See leceiit papers of Olillinm ainl ]"islicr, in Gori U. S. Gcol. SufZ'cy, 1882-83.
THE HISTORY OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC 89
bottoms of Norway and Scotland, on the top of Moel Tryfaen,
in Wales, and at similar great heights on the hills of America,
many of which can be traced back to early Tertiary times, and
can be found to have extended themselves over all the seas of
the northern hemisphere. They apply in like manner to the
ferns, the conifers, and the broad-leaved trees, many of which
we can now trace without specific change to the Eocene and
Cretaceous. They all show that the forms of living things are
more stable than the lands and seas in which they live. If we
were to adopt some of the modern ideas of evolution, we might
cut the Gordian knot by supposing that, as like causes produce
like effects, these types of life have originated more than once
in geological time, and need not be genetically connected with
each other. But while evolutionists repudiate such an appli-
cation of their doctrine, however natural and rational, it would
seem that nature still more strongly repudiates it, and will not
allow us to assume more than one origin for one species.
Thus the great question of geographical distribution remains
in all its force ; and. by still another of our geological paradoxes,
mountains become ephemeral things in comparison with the
delicate herbage which covers them, and seas are in their pre-
sent extent but of yesterday, when compared with the minute
and feeble organisms that creep on their sands or swim in their
waters.
The question remains : Has the Atlantic achieved its des-
tiny and finished its course, or are there other changes in store
for it in the future ? The earth's crust is now thicker and
stronger than ever before, and its great ribs of crushed and
folded rock are more firm and rigid than in any previous period.
The stupendous volcanic phenomena manifested in Mesozoic
and early Tertiary times along the borders of the Atlantic
have apparently died out. These facts are in so far guarantees
of permanence. On the other hand, it is known that move-
ments of elevation, along with local depression, are in progress
90 THE HISTORY OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC
in the Arctic regions, and a great weight of new sediment is
being deposited along the borders of the Atlantic, especially
on its western side ; and this is not improbably connected with
the earthquake shocks and slight movements of depression
which have occurred in North America. It is possible that
these slight and secular movements may go on uninterruptedly,
or with occasional paroxysmal disturbances, until considerable
changes are produced.
It is possible, on the other hand, that after the long period
of quiescence which has elapsed, there may be a new settlement
of the ocean bed, accompanied with foldings of the crust, es-
pecially on the western side of the Atlantic, and possibly with
renewed volcanic activity on its eastern margin. In either
case, a long time relatively to our limited human chronology
may intervene before the occurrence of any marked change.
On the whole, the experience of the past would lead us to ex-
pect movements and eruptive discharges in the Pacific rather
than in the Atlantic area. It is therefore not unlikely that the
Atlantic may remain undisturbed, unless secondarily and in-
directly, until after the Pacific area shall have attained to a
greater degree of quiescence than at present. But this subject
is one too much involved in uncertainty to warrant us in follow-
ing it farther.
In the meantime the Atlantic is to us a practically permanent
ocean, varying only its tides, its currents, and its winds, which
science has already reduced to definite laws, so that we can
use if we cannot regulate them. It is ours to take advantage
of this precious time of quietude, and to extend the blessings
of science and of our Christian civilisation from shore to shore,
until there shall be no more sea, not in the sense of that final
drying-up of old ocean to which some physicists look forward,
but in the higher sense of its ceasing to be the emblem of un-
rest and disturbance, and the cause of isolation.
I must now close this chapter with a short statement of some
THE HISTORY OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC 9 1
general truths which I have had in view in directing attention
to the geological development of the Atlantic. We cannot,
I think, consider the topics to which I have referred with-
out perceiving that the history of ocean and continent is an
example of progressive design, quite as much as that of living
beings. Nor can we fail to see that, while in some important
directions we have penetrated the great secret of nature, in
reference to the general plan and structure of the earth and
its w^aters, and the changes through which they have passed,
we have still very much to learn, and perhaps quite as much to
unlearn, and that the future holds out to us and to our suc-
cessors higher, grander, and clearer conceptions than those to
which we have yet attained. The vastness and the might of
ocean and the manner in which it cherishes the feeblest and
most fragile beings, alike speak to us of Him who holds it in
the hollow of His hand, and gave to it of old its boundaries
and its laws ; but its teaching ascends to a higher tone when
we consider its origin and history, and the manner in which it
has been made to build up continents and mountain-chains,
and, at the same time, to nourish and sustain the teeming life
of sea and land.
References : — Presidential Address to the British Association for tlie
Advancement of Science, Birmingham, 1SS6. " Geology of Nova
Scotia, New Brunswick, and Prince Edward Island." Fourth
Edition, London, 1S91.
S. E.
THE DAWX OF LIFE.
DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF
SIR WILLIAM E. LOGAX,
The UNWEARIED Explorer of the Laurentlvn Rocks,
AND THE Founder
OF THE
Geological Survey of Canada.
What are the Oldest Rocks, and where? — Conditions
OF their Formation — Indications of Life— What its
probable" Nature
XATURE-rRiXT 01" Eozoox, showiiig laiiiinateJ, acervuline, and fragniental
portions.
This is printed from an electrotype taken from an etched slab of Eozoon,
and not touched with a graver except to remedy some accidental flaws in
the plate. Tlie diagonal white line marks the course of a calcite vein.
CHAPTER V.
THE DAWN OF LIFE
DO we know the first animal ? Can we name it, explain
its structure, and state its relations to its successors ?
Can we do this by inference from the succeeding types of
being ; and if so, do our anticipations agree with any actual
reality disinterred from the earth's crust ? If we could do this ,
either by inference or actual discovery, how strange it would
be to know that we had before us even the remains of the first
creature that could feel or will, and could place itself in vital
relation with the great powers of inanimate nature. If we
believe in a Creator, we shall feel it a solemn thing to have
access to the first creature into which He breathed the breath
of life. If we hold that all things have been evolved from
collision of dead forces, then the first molecules of matter
which took upon themselves the responsibility of living, and,
aiming at the enjoyment of happiness, subjected themselves to
the dread alternatives of pain and mortality, must surely evoke
from us that filial reverence which we owe to the authors of
our own being ; if they do not involuntarily draw forth even a
superstitious adoration. The veneration of the old Egyptian
for his sacred animals would be a comparatively reasonable
idolatry, if we could imagine any of these animals to have
been the first that emerged from the domain of dead matter,
and the first link in a reproductive chain of being that produced
all the population of the world. Independently of any such
hypotheses, all students of nature must regard with surpassing
96 THE DAWN OF LIFE
interest the first bright streaks of h'ght that break on the long
reign of primeval night and death, and presage the busy day
of teeming animal existence.
No wonder, then, that geologists have long and earnestly
groped in the rocky archives of the earth in search of some
record of this patriarch of the animal kingdom. But after
long and patient research there still remained a large residuum
of the oldest rocks destitute of all traces of living beings, and
designated by the hopeless name " Azoic," — the formations
destitute of remains of life, the stony records of a lifeless
world. So the matter remained till the Laurentian rocks of
Canada, lying at the base of these old Azoic formations,
afforded forms believed to be of organic origin. The dis-
covery was hailed with enthusiasm by those wlio had been
prepared by previous study to receive it. It was regarded with
feeble and not very intelligent faith by many more, and was
met with half-concealed or open scepticism by others. It pro-
duced a copious crop of descriptive and controversial literature,
but for the most part technical, and confined to scientific trans-
actions and periodicals, read by very few except specialists.
Thus, few even of geological and biological students have clear
ideas of the real nature and mode of occurrence of these
ancient organisms, if organisms they are, and of their relations
to better known forms of life ; while the crudest and most in-
accurate ideas have been current in lectures and popular books,
and even in text-books.
-This state of things has long ceased to be desirable in the
interests of science, since the settlement of the questions raised
is in the highest degree important to the history of life. We
cannot, it is true, aflirm that Eo/.oon is in reality the long-
sought prototype of animal existence ; but it was for us, at
least until recently, the last organic foothold, on which we can
poise ourselves, that we may look back into the abyss of the infi-
nite past, and forward to the long and varied progress of life in
THE DAWN OF LIFE 9/
geological time. Now, however, we have announcements to be
referred to in the sequel of other organisms discovered in the
so-called Archaean rocks ; and it is not improbable that these
will rapidly increase. The discussion of its claims have also
raised questions and introduced new points, certain, if properly
entered into, to be fruitful of interesting and valuable thought,
and to form a good introduction to the history of life in con-
nection with geology.
As we descend in depth and time into the earth's crust,
after passing through nearly all the vast series of strata consti-
tuting the monuments of geological history, we at length reach
the Eozoic or Laurentian rocks,' deepest and oldest of all the
formations known to the geologist, and more thoroughly altered
or metamorphosed by heat and heated moisture than any
others. These rocks, at one time known as Azoic, being sup-
posed destitute of all remains of living things, but now more
properly Eozoic, are those in which the first bright streaks of
the dawn of life make their appearance.
The name I.aurentian, given originally to the Canadian
develoi)ment of these rocks by Sir William Logan, but now
applied to them throughout the world, is derived from a range
of hills lying north of the St. Lawrence valley, which the old
French geographers named the Laurentides. In these hills
the harder rocks of this old formation rise to considerable
heights, and form the highlands separating the St. Lawrence
valley from the great plain fronting on Hudson's Bay and the
Arctic Sea. At first sight it may seem strange that rocks so
ancient should anywhere appear at the surface, especially on
the tops of hills ; but this is a necessary result of the mode of
formation of our continents. The most ancient sediments
deposited in the sea were those first elevated into land, and
first altered and hardened. Upheaved in the folding of the
earth's crust into high and rugged ridges, they have either re-
^ Otherwise named "Archiran."
98 THE DAWN OF LIFE
mained uncovered with newer sediments, or have had such as
were deposited on them washed away ; and being of a hard
and resisting nature, they have remained comparatively unworn
when rocks much more modern have been swept off by denud-
ing agencies.^
But the exposure of the old Laurentian skeleton of mother
earth is not confined to the Laurentide Hills, though these
have given the formation its name. The same ancient rocks
appear in the Adirondack mountains of New York, and in
the patches which at lower levels protrude from beneath the
newer formations along the American coast from Newfoundland
to Maryland. The older gneisses of Norway, Sweden, and
the Hebrides, of Bavaria and Bohemia, of Egypt, Abyssinia
and Arabia, belong to the same age, and it is not unlikely that
similar rocks in many other parts of the old continent will be
found to be of as great antiquity. In no part of the world,
however, are the Laurentian rocks more extensively distributed
or better known than in Canada ; and to this as the grandest
and most instructive development of them we may more
especially devote our attention.
The Laurentian rocks, associated with another series only a
little younger, the Huronian, form a great belt of broken and
hilly country, extending from Labrador across the north of
Canada to Lake Superior, and thence bending northward to
the Arctic Sea. Everywhere on the lower St. Lawrence they
appear as ranges of billowy rounded ridges on the north side
of the river, and as viewed from the water or the southern
shore, especially when sunset deepens their tints to blue and
violet, they present a grand and massive appearance, which, in
the eye of the geologist, who knows that they have endured
the battles and the storms of time longer than any other moun-
' This iinplics tlie permanence of continents in llieir main features, a
doctrine the writer lias maintained for tliirty years, and wliich is discussed
elsewhere.
THE DAWN OF LIFE 99
tains, invests them with the dignity which their mere elevation
would fail to give. (Fig. i.) In the isolated mass of the
Adirondacks, south of the Canadian frontier, they rise to a
still greater elevation, and form an imposing mountain group,
almost equal in height to their somewhat more modern rivals,
the White Mountains, which face them on the opposite side of
Lake Champlain.
The grandeur of the old Laurentian ranges is, however, best
displayed where they have been cut across by the great trans-
verse gorge of the Saguenay, and where the magnificent preci-
pices, known as Capes Trinity and Eternity, look down from
their elevation of 1,500 feet on the fiord, which at their feet is
more than 100 fathoms deep. The name Eternity applied to
such a mass is geologically scarcely a misnomer, for it dates
back to the very dawn of geological time, and is of hoar
antiquity in comparison with such upstart ranges as the Andes
and the Alps. (See Frontispiece.)
On a nearer acquaintance, the Laurentian country appears
as a broken and hilly upland and highland district, clad in its
pristine state with magnificent forests, but affording few attrac-
tions to the agriculturist, except in the valleys, which follow the
lines of its softer beds, while it is a favourite region for the
angler, the hunter, and the lumberman. ]\Lany of the Lauren-
tian townships of Canada are, however, already extensively
settled, and the traveller may pass through a succession of
more or less cultivated valleys, bounded by rocks or wooded
hills and crags, and diversified by running streams and roman-
tic lakes and ponds, constituting a country always picturesque
and often beautiful, and rearing a strong and hardy population.
To the geologist it presents in the main immensely thick beds
of gneiss, bedded diorite and quartzite, and similar crystalline
rocks, contorted in the most remarkable manner, so that if
they could be flattened out they would serve as a skin much
too large for mother earth in her present state, so much has
THE DAWX OF LIfE
.\ir.M. lit
I
1
"^i.
'''y'm Z I
,;i.l
THE DAWN OF LIFE lOI
she shmnk and vnnkled ance those
youthful days when the Lanroitian roc^
woe her outer covering.
I cannot describe such locks, but their
names, as givoi in the section. Fig. 2.
win teQ something to those who have
any knowledge of the older crystalline
materials of the earth s crusL To those
who have not, I would advise a visit to
some cUff on the lower Sl Lawrence^ or
the Hebridean coasts, or the shore of
Norway, whoe the old hard crystalline
and gnaried beds {nresent their sharp
edges to the ever raging sea, and show
tfadr endless alternations of various kinds
and colours of strata, often diversified
with veins and nests of crystalline
minerals. He who has seen and studied
such a section of Laurentian rock carmot
forget it
The elaborate stradgrai^cal work of
Sir WllUam Logan has proved that these
old ajstalUne rocks are bedded or
stratified, and that they must have been
deposited in succession by some process
of aqueous action. They have, however,
through geological ages of vast duration
been subjected to pressure and chemical
action, which have, as stated in a pre-
vious chapter, much modified their struc-
ture, while it is also certain that they
must have differed originally 6rom the
sands, clays and other materials laid
down in the sea in later times.
102 THE DAWN OF LIFE
It is interesting to notice here that the Laurentian rocks
thus interpreted show that the oldest known portions of our
continents were formed in the waters. They are oceanic sedi-
ments deposited perhaps when there was no dry land, or very
little, and that little unknown to us, except in so far as its
debris may have entered into the composition of the Lauren-
tian rocks themselves. Thus the earliest condition of the
earth known to the geologist is one in which old ocean was
already dominant on its surface ; and any previous condition
when the surface was heated, and the water constituted an
abyss of vapours enveloping its surface, or any still earlier con-
dition in which the earth was gaseous or vaporous, is a matter
of mere inference, not of actual observation. The formless
and void chaos is a deduction of chemical and physical prin-
ciples, not a fact observed by the geologist. Still we know,
from the great dykes and masses of igneous or molten rock
which traverse the Laurentian beds, that even at that early
period there were deep-seated fires beneath the crust ; and it
is quite possible that volcanic agencies then manifested them-
selves, not only with quite as great intensity, but also in the
same manner, as at subsequent times. It is thus not unlikeh-
that much of the land undergoing waste in the earlier Lauren-
tian time was of the same nature with recent volcanic ejections,
and that it formed groups of islands in an otherwise boundless
ocean.
However this may be, the distribution and extent of these
pre-Laurentian lands is, and probably ever must be, unknown
to us ; for it was only after the Laurentian rocks had been
deposited, and after the shrinkage and deformation of the
earth's crust in subsecjuent times had bent and contorted them,
that the foundations of the continents were laid. The rude
sketch map of America given in Fig. 3 will show this, and will
also show that the old Laurentian mountains mark out the
future form of the American continent.
THE DAWN OF LIFE
103
Some subsequent writers have, it is true, treated with dis-
behef Logan's great discoveries ; but no competent geologist
who has traced the regularly bedded limestones and other
rocks of his original fields of investigation could continue to
doubt. On this subject I may quote from my friend Dr.
Bonney, one of the most judicious of the builders who under-
take hypothetically to lay the foundation stones of the earth's
-Tlie Laurentian Nucleus of th
ilLl- I
Fig. 3.-
crust for our enlightenment in those later days. In an address
delivered at the Bath meeting of the British Association he
says : —
"The first deposits on the solidified crust of the earth would
obviously be igneous. As water condensed from the atmo-
sphere on the cooling surface, aqueous waste or condensation
would begin, and stratified deposits in the ocean would become
104 'THE DAWN OF LIFE
possible in addition to detrital volcanic material. But at that
time the crust itself, and even later stratified deposits would
often be kept for a considerable period at a high temperature.
Thus, not only rocks of igneous origin (including volcanic
ashes) would predominate in the lowest foundation stones, but
also secondary changes would occur more readily, and even
the sediments or precipitates might be greatly modified. As
time went on, true sediments would predominate over volcanic
materials, and these would be less and less affected by chemical
changes, and would more and more retain their original char-
acter. Thus we should expect that as we retraced the earth's
course through ' the corridor of time ' we should arrive at
rocks which, though crystalline in structure, were evidently in
great part sedimentary in origin, and should behind them find
rocks of more coarsely crystalline texture and more dubious
character, which, however, probably were in part of a like
origin, and should at last reach coarsely crystalline rocks, in
which, while occasional sediments would be possible, the
majority were originally igneous, though modified at a very
early period of their history. This corresponds with what we
find in nature, when we apply, cautiously and tentatively, the
principles of interpretation which guide us in stratigraphical
geology." ^
This expresses very well the general result of the patient
stratigraphical and chemical labours of Logan and Sterry
Hunt, as applied to the vast areas of old crystalline stratified
rocks in Canada, and which I have had abundant opportunities
to verify on the ground. Under the undoubted Cambrian
beds of Canada lies the Huronian, a formation largely of
hardened sands, clays and gravels, now forming sandstones,
slates, and conglomerates, but with great beds of igneous or
volcanic rock, and hardened and altered ash beds. Under
^ "The Foundation Stones of the Earth's Ciust," 1888. The extract is
slightly condensed.
THE DAWN OF LIFE I05
this, in the upper portion of the Laurentian, we have regularly
bedded rocks, quartzites, limestones, and quartzose, and gra-
phitic and ferruginous gneisses, evidently altered aqueous
sediments ; but intermixed with other rocks, as diorites and
hornblendic gneisses, which are plainly of different origin.
Lastly, on the bottom of all, we have nothing but coarse
crystalline gneiss, representing perhaps the earliest crust of a
cooling globe. Broadly, and without entering into details or
theoretical views as to the precise causes of formation and
alteration of these rocks, this is the structure of the Archasan
or Eozoic system in Canada ; and it corresponds with that of
the basement or foundation stones of our continents in every
country that I have been able to visit, or of which T have
trustworthy accounts.
In the lower or fundamental gneiss, and in the igneous beds
which succeed it, we need not look for any indications of
living beings; but so soon as the sea began to deposit sand,
mud, limestone, iron ore, carbon, there would be nothing to
exclude the presence of some forms of marine life ; while, as
land must have already existed, there would be a possibility of
life on it. This, therefore, we may begin to look for so soon
as we ascend to those beds of the Laurentian in, which lime-
stone, iron ore, and quartzite appear ; and it is precisely at this
point in the Laurentian of Canada that indications of life are
supposed to have been found. Certain it is that if we cannot
find some sign of life in the Laurentian or Huronian, we shall
have to face as the beginnings of life the swarms of marine
creatures that appear all over the globe at once, in the early
Cambrian age.
Is it likely, then, that such rocks should afford any traces of
living beings, even if any such existed when they were formed?
Geologists who had traced organic remains back to the lowest
Cambrian might hope for such remains, even in the Lauren-
tian ; but they long looked in vain for their actual discovery.
s. E. 8
I06 THE DAWN OF LIFE
Still, as astronomers have suspected the existence of unknown
planets from observing perturbations not accounted for, and
as voyagers have suspected the approach to unknown regions
by the appearance of floating wood or stray land birds, antici-
pations of such discoveries have been entertained and ex-
pressed from time to time. Lyell, Dana, and Dr. Sterry Hunt
more especially have committed themselves to such specula-
tions. The reasons assigned may be stated thus : —
Assuming the Laurentian rocks to be altered sediments,
tliey must, from their great extent, have been deposited in the
ocean ; and if there had been no living creatures in the waters,
we have no reason to believe that they would have consisted of
anything more than such sandy and muddy debris as may be
washed away from wasting rocks originally of igneous origin.
But the Laurentian beds contain other materials than these.
No formations of any geological age include thicker or more
extensive limestones. One of the beds measured by the
officers of the Geological Survey is stated to be 1,500 feet in
thickness, another is 1,250 feet thick, and a third, 750 feet;
making an aggregate of 3,500 feet.^ These beds may be traced,
with more or less interruption, for hundreds of miles. What-
ever the origin of such limestones, it is plain that they indicate
causes equal in extent, and comparable in power and duration,
with those which have produced the greatest limestones of the
later geological periods. Now, in later formations, limestone
is usually an organic rock, accumulated by the slow gathering
from the sea-water, or its plants, of calcareous matter, by
corals, foraminifera, or shell fish, and the deposition of their
skeletons, either entire or in fragments, in the sea bottom.
The most friable chalk and the most crystalline limestones
have alike been formed in this way. We know of no reason
why it should be different in the Laurentian period. When,
* Logan : "Geology of Canada," p. 45.
THE DAWN OF LIFE I07
therefore, we find great and conformable beds of limestone,
such as those described by Sir William Logan in the Lauren-
tian of Canada, we naturally imagine a quiet sea bottom, in
which multitudes of animals of humble organization were
accumulating limestone in their hard parts, and depositing
this in gradually increasing thickness from age to age. Any
attempts to account otherwise for these thick and greatly
extended beds, regularly interstratified with other deposits,
have so far been failures, and have arisen either from a want
of comprehension of the nature and magnitude of the appear-
ances to be explained, or from the error of mistaking the true
bedded limestones for veins of calcareous spar.
The Laurentian rocks contain great quantities of carbon, in
the form of graphite or plumbago. This does not occur
wholly, or even principally, in veins or fissures, but in the sub-
stance of the limestone and gneiss, and in regular layers. So
abundant is it, that I have estimated the amount of carbon in
one division of the Lower Laurentian of the Ottawa district at
an aggregate thickness of not less than twenty to thirty feet, an
amount comparable with that in the true coal formation itself
Now we know of no agency existing in present or in past
geological time capable of deoxidizing carbonic acid, and
fixing its carbon as an ingredient in permanent rocks, except
vegetable life. Unless, therefore, we suppose that there existed
in the Laurentian age a vast abundance of vegetation, either in
the sea or on the land, we have no means of explaining the
Laurentian graphite.
The Laurentian formation contains great beds of oxide of
iron, sometimes seventy feet in thickness. Here, again, we
have an evidence of organic action ; for it is the deoxidizing
power of vegetable matter which has in all the later formations
been the efficient cause in producing bedded deposits of iron.
This is the case in modern bog and lake ores, in the clay iron-
stones of the coal measures, and apparently, also, in the great
Io8 THE DAWN OF LIFE
ore beds of the Silurian rocks. May not similar causes have
been at work in the Laurentian period ?
Any one of these reasons might, in itself, be held insufficient
to prove so great and, at first sight, unlikely a conclusion as
that of the existence of abundant animal and vegetable life in
the Laurentian ; but the concurrence of the whole in a series
of deposits unquestionably marine, forms a chain of evidence
so powerful that it might command belief even if no fragment
of any organic and living form or structure had ever been
recognised in these ancient rocks.
Such was the condition of the matter until the existence of
supposed organic remains was announced by Sir W. Logan, at
the American Association for the Advancement of Science, in
Springfield, in 1859 ; and we may now proceed to narrate the
manner of this discovery, and how it has been followed up.
Before doing so, however, let us visit Eozoon in one of its
haunts among the Laurentian Hills. One of the most noted
repositories of its remains is the great Grenville band of lime-
stone; and one of the most fruitful localities is at a place
called Cote St. Pierre on this band. Leaving the train at
Papineauville, we find ourselves on the Laurentian rocks, and
pass over one of the great bands of gneiss for about twelve
miles, to the village of St. Andre Avelin. On the road we see
on either hand abrupt rocky ridges, partially clad with forest,
and sometimes showing on their flanks the stratification of the
gneiss in very distinct parallel bands, often contorted, as if the
rocks, when soft, had been wrung as a washerwoman wrings
clothes. Between the hills are little irregular valleys, from
which the wheat and oats have just been reaped, and the tall
Indian corn and yellow pumpkins are still standing in the
fields. Where not cultivated, the land is covered with a rich
second growth of young maples, birches, and oaks, among
which still stand the stumps and tall scathed trunks of enor-
mous pines, which constituted the original forest. Half way
THE DAWN OF LIFE IO9
we cross the Nation River, a stream nearly as large as the
Tweed, flowing placidly between wooded banks, which are
mirrored in its surface ; but in the distance we can hear the
roar of its rapids, dreaded by lumberers in their spring drivings
of logs. Arrived at St. Andre, we find a wider valley, the
indication of the change to the limestone band, and along this,
with the gneiss hills still in view on either hand, and often
encroaching on the road, we drive for five miles more to Cote
St. Pierre. At this place the lowest depression of the valley is
occupied by a little pond, and, hard by, the limestone, pro-
FiG. 4. — Attiuule of Limestone .it .St. Pierre, (a) Gneiss band in the
Limestone. (/') Limestone with Lozoon. {c) Dioiite and Gneiss.
tected by a ridge of gneiss, rises in an abrupt wooded bank by
the roadside, and a little farther forms a bare white promontory,
projecting into the fields.
The limestone is here highly inclined and nmch contorted,
and in all the excavations a thickness of about 100 feet of it
may be exposed. It is white and crystalline, varying much,
however, in coarseness in different bands. It is in some layers
pure and white ; in others it is traversed by many grey layers of
gneissose and other matter, or by irregular bands and nodules
of pyroxene and serpentine, and it contains subordinate beds of
dolomite. In one layer only, and this but a few feet thick,
does the Eozoon occur in abundance in a perfect state, though
no THE DAWN OF LIFE
fragments and imperfectly preserved specimens abound in
other parts of the bed. It is a great mistake to suppose that it
constitutes whole beds of rock in an uninterrupted mass. Its
true mode of occurrence is best seen on the weathered sur-
faces of the rock, where the serpentinous specimens project in
irregular patches of various sizes, sometimes twisted by the
contortion of the beds, but often too small to suffer in this way.
On such surfaces the projecting patches of the fossil exhibit
laminae of serpentine so precisely like the Stromatopone of the
Silurian rocks, that any collector would pounce upon them at
once as fossils. In some places these small weathered speci-
mens can be easily chipped off from the crumbling surface of
the limestone ; and it is perhaps to be regretted that they have
not been more extensively shown to palaeontologists, with the
cut slices which to many of them are so problematical. One
of the original specimens, brought from the Calumet, and now
in the Museum of the Geological Survey of Canada, was of
this kind, and much finer specimens from Cote St. Pierre are
now in that collection and in my own. A very fine example is
represented on the plate facing this chapter, which is taken
from an original photograph. In some of the layers are found
other and more minute vesicular forms, which may be organic,
and these, together with fragmental remains, as ingredients in
the limestone, will be discussed in the sequel. We may merely
notice here that the most abundant layer of P^ozoon at this
place occurs near the base of the great limestone band, and
that the upper layers, in so far as seen, are less rich in it.
Further, there is no necessary connection between Eozoon
and the occurrence of serpentine, for there are many layers full
of bands and lenticular masses of that mineral without any
Eozoon except occasional fragments, while the fossil is some-
times partially mineralised with pyroxene, dolomite, or common
limestone. The section in Fig. 4 will serve to show the atti-
tude of the limestone at this place, while the more general
THE DAWN OF LIFE I I I
section, Fig. 2, page loi, taken from Sir William Logan, shows
its relation to the other Laurentian rocks.
We may now notice the manner in which the specimens
discovered in this and other places in the Laurentian country
came to be regarded as organic.
It is a trite remark that most discoveries are made, not by one
person, but by the joint exertions of many, and that they have
their preparations made often long before they actually appear.
For this reason I may be excused here for introducing some
personal details in relation to the discovery of Eozoon, and
which are indeed necessary in vindication of its claims. Li this
case the stable foundations were laid years before the discovery
of Eozoon, by the careful surveys made by Sir William Logan
and his assistants, and the chemical examination of the rocks
and minerals by Dr. Sterry Hunt, which established beyond all
doubt the great age and truly bedded character of the Lauren-
tian rocks and their probable original nature, and the changes
which they have experienced in the course of geological time.
On the other hand, Dr. Carpenter and others in England were
examining the structure of the shells of the humbler inhabitants
of the modern ocean, and the manner in which the pores of
their skeletons become infiltrated with mineral matter when
deposited in the sea bottom. These laborious and apparently
dissimilar branches of scientific inquiry were destined to be
united by a series of happy discoveries, made not fortuitously
but by painstaking and intelligent observers. The discovery
of the most ancient fossil was thus not the chance picking up
of a rare and curious specimen. It was not likely to be found
in this way ; and if so found, it would have remained unnoticed
and of no scientific value, but for the accumulated stores of
zoological and palseontological knowledge, and the surveys
previously made, whereby the age and distribution of the
Laurentian rocks and the chemical conditions of their deposi-
tion and metamorphism were ascertained.
112 THE DAWN OF LIFE
The first specimens of Eozoon ever procured, in so far as
known, were collected at Burgess, in Ontario, by a veteran
Canadi.ui mineralogist, Dr. Wilson, of Perth, and were sent to
Sir William Logan as mineral specimens. Their chief interest
at that time lay in the fact that certain laminae of a dark green
mineral present in the specimens were found, on analysis by Dr.
Hunt, to be composed of a new hydrous silicate, allied to serpen-
tine, and which he named loganite. The form of this mineral
was not suspected to be of organic origin. Some years after, in
1858, other specimens, differently mineralized with the minerals
serpentine and pyroxene, were found by Mr. J. McMullen,
an explorer in the service of the Geological Survey, in the
limestone of the Grand Calumet on the River Ottawa. These
seem to have at once struck Sir W. E. Logan as resembling the
Silurian fossils known as Stroniatopora, and he showed them
to Mr. Billings, the paleontologist of the survey, and to the
writer, with this suggestion, confirming it with the sagacious
consideration that inasmuch as the Ottawa and Burgess speci-
mens were mineralized by different substances, yet were alike
in form, there was little probability that they were merely
mineral or concretionary. Mr. Billings was naturally unwilling
to risk his reputation in affirming the organic nature of such
specimens ; and my own suggestion was that they should be
sliced, and examined microscopically, and that if fossils, as they
presented merely concentric laminoi and no cells, they would
probably prove to be protozoa rather than corals. A few slices
were accordingly made, but no definite structure could be
detected. Nevertheless, Sir William Logan took some of the
specimens to the meeting of the American Association at
Springfield, in 1859, and exhibited them as possibly Laurentian
fossils ; but the announcement was evidently received with
some incredulity. Li 1862 they were exhibited by Sir William
to some geological friends in London, but he remarks that
"few seemed disposed to believe in their organic character,
Fig. I.
FjG. 2.
Fk
Fig. I. Small aPLCi.MEN of Eozoon, weathered out, natural size, from
a photograph.
Fig. 2. Canal System of Eozoon injected with serpentine (magni-
fied).
Fig. 3. Very fine Canals and Tukuli filled with Dolumite (magni-
fied).
(From Micro-photographs.-)
THE DAWN OF LIFE
113
with the exception of my friend, Professor Ramsay." In 1863
the general Report of the Geological Survey, summing up its
P"iG. 5. — Weathered Specimen of Eozoon from the Calumet.
(Collected by Mr. McMullen.)
\
MSSS1''V'1:.\
Fu;. 6. — Cross Section of the Specimen represented in Fig. 8. The
dark parts are the lamince of calcareous matter converging to the outer
surface.
114 THE DAWN OF LIFE
work to that time, was published, under the name of the
" Geology of Canada," and in this, at page 49, will be found
two figures of one of the Calumet specimens, here reproduced,
and which, though unaccompanied with any specific name or
technical description, were referred to as probably Laurentian
fossils. (Figs. 5 and 6.)
About this time Dr. Hunt happened to mention to me, in
connection with a paper on the mineralization of fossils which
he was preparing, that he proposed to notice the mode of
preservation of certain fossil woods and other things with
which I was familiar, and that he would show me the paper in
proof, in order that I might give him any suggestions that
occurred to me. On reading it, I observed, among other
things, that he alluded to the supposed Laurentian fossils,
under the impression that the organic part was represented by
the serpentine or loganite, and that the calcareous matter was
the filling of the chambers. I took exception to this, stating
that though in the slices I had examined no structure was
apparent, still my impression was that the calcareous matter
was the fossil, and the serpentine or loganite the filling. He
said- — " In that case, would it not be well to re-examine the
specimens, and try to discover which view is correct ? " He
mentioned, at the same time, that Sir ^\"illiam had recently
shown him some new and beautiful specimens collected by Mr.
Lowe, one of the explorers on the staff of the Survey, from a
third locality, at Grenville, on the Ottawa. It was supposed
that these might throw further light on the subject ; and
accordingly Dr. Hunt suggested to Sir ^\'illiam to have
additional slices of these new specimens made by Mr. Weston,
of the Survey, whose skill as a preparer of these and other
fossils has often done good service to science. A few days
thereafter some slices were sent to me, and were at once put
under the microscope. I was delighted to find in one of the
first specimens examined a beautiful group of tubuli penetrating
THE DAWN OF LIFE II5
one of the calcite layers. Here was evidence, not only that
the calcite layers represented the true skeleton of the fossil,
but also of its affinities with the foraminifera, whose tubulated
supplemental skeleton, as described and figured by Dr. Car-
penter, and represented in specimens in my collection, pre-
sented by him, was apparently of the same type with that
preserved in the canals of these ancient fossils. Hg. 7 is an
accurate representation of the group of canals first detected by
me.
}
I
(
(
Fig. 7. — Group of Canals in the Supplemental Skeleton of Eozoon.
Taken from the specimen in which they were first recognised. Magnified.
(Camera tracing by Mr. H. S. Smith.)
On showing the structures discovered to Sir William Logan,
he entered into the matter with enthusiasm, and had a great
number of slices, as well as decalcified specimens, prepared,
which were placed in my hands for examination.
Feeling that the discovery was most important, but that it
would be met with determined scepticism by a great many
geologists, I was not content with examining the typical speci-
.mens of Eozoon, but had slices prepared pf every variety of
Il6 THE DAWN OF LIFE
Laurentian limestone, of altered limestones from the Primordial
and Silurian, and of serpentine marbles of all the varieties
furnished by our collections. They were examined with ordi-
nary and polarized light, and with every variety of illumination.
They were also examined as decalcified specimens, after the
carbonate of lime had been removed by acids. An extensive
series of notes and camera tracings were made of all the
appearances observed ; and of some of the more important
structures beautiful drawings were executed by the late Mr.
H. S. Smith, the then palteontological draughtsman of the
Survey. The result of the whole investigation was a firm con-
viction that the structure was organic and foraminiferal, and
that it could be distinguished from any merely mineral or
crystalline forms occurring in these or other limestones.
At this stage of the matter, and after exhibiting to Sir
William all the characteristic appearances, in comparison with
such concretionary, dendritic and crystalline structures as
most resembled them, and also with the structure of recent and
fossil Foraminifera, I suggested that the further prosecution
of the matter should be handed over to Mr. Billings, as
paleontologist of the Survey. I was engaged in other re-
searches, not connected with the Survey or with this particular
department, and I knew that no little labour must be devoted
to the work and to its publication, and that some controversy
might be expected. Mr. Billings, however, with his character-
istic caution and modesty, declined. His hands were full of
other work. He had not given any special attention to the
microscopic appearances of Foraminifera or of mineral sub-
stances. It w^as finally arranged that I should prepare a de
scription of the fossil, which Sir William would take to London,
along with the more important specimens, and a detailed list
stating all the structures observed in each. Sir AN'illiam was to
submit the manuscript and specimens to Dr. Carpenter, or,
failing him, to Prof. T. Rupert Jones, in the hope that these
THE DAWN OF LIFE II7
eminent authorities would confirm my conclusions, and bring
forward new facts which I might have overlooked or been
ignorant of. Sir William saw both gentlemen, who gave their
testimony in favour of the organic and foraminiferal character
of the specimens ; and Dr. Carpenter, in particular, gave much
attention to the subject, and worked out more in detail many
of the finer structures, besides contributing valuable suggestions
as to the probable affinities of the supposed fossil.
Dr. Carpenter thus contributed in a very important manner
to the perfecting of the investigations begun in Canada, and on
him fell the greater part of their illustration and defence,^ in so
far as Great Britain is concerned.
The immediate result was a composite paper in the Pro-
ceedings of the Geological Society, by Sir W. E. Logan, Dr. Car-
penter, Dr. Hunt, and myself, in which the geology, palaeonto-
logy and mineralogy of Eozoon Canadense and its containing
rocks were first given to the world.^ It cannot be wondered at
that when geologists and palseontologists were thus required to
believe in the existence of organic remains in rocks regarded as
altogether Azoic and hopelessly barren of fossils, and to carry
back the dawn of life as far before those Primordial rocks,
which were supposed to contain its first traces, as these are
before the middle period of the earth's life history, some hesita-
tion should be felt Further, the accurate appreciation of the
evidence for such a fossil as Eozoon required an amount of
knowledge of minerals, of the more humble types of animals,
and of the conditions of mineralization of organic remains, pos-
sessed by few even of professional geologists. Thus Eozoon has
met with some scepticism and not a little opposition, — though
the latter has been weaker than we might have expected when
^ In Quaiterly Journal of Geological Society, vol. xxii. ; Proc. Royal
Society, vol. xv. ; Intellectual Observer, 1S65. Annals and Magazine of
Natural History, 1874 ; and other papers and notices.
'^ Journal Ceolooical Society, February, 1865.
IlS THE DAWN OF LIFE
we consider the startling character of the facts adduced, and
has mostly come from men imperfectly informed.
But what is Eozoon, if really of animal origin ? The shortest
answer to this question is, that this ancient fossil is supposed
to be the skeleton of a creature belonging to that simple and
humbly organized group of animals which are known by the
name Protozoa. If we take as a fi^miliar example of these the
gelatinous and microscopic creature found in stagnant ponds,
and known as the Amceba ^ (Fig. 8), it will form a convenient
starting-point. Viewed under a low power, it appears as a
little patch of jelly, irregular in form, and constantly changing
its aspect as it moves, by the extension of parts of its body into
finger-like processes or pseudopods which serve as extempore
limbs. When moving on the surface of a slip of glass under
the microscope, it seems, as it were, to flow along rather than
creep, and its body appears to be of a semi-fluid consistency.
It may be taken as an example of the least complex forms of
animal life known to us, and is often spoken of by naturalists
as if it were merely a little particle of living and scarcely organ-
ized jelly or protoplasm. When minutely examined, however,
it will not be found so simple as it at first sight appears. Its
outer layer is clear and transparent, and more dense than the
inner mass, which seems granular. It has at one end a curious
vesicle which can be seen gradually to expand and become
filled with a clear drop of liquid, and then suddenly to contract
and expel the contained fluid through a series of pores in the
adjacent part of the outer wall. This is the so-called pulsating
vesicle, and is an organ both of circulation and excretion. In
another part of the body may be seen the nucleus, which is a
little cell capable, at certain times, of producing by its division
new individuals. Food, when taken in through the wall of the
body, forms little pellets, which become surrounded by a
^ The allemnting animal, alluding to its change of form.
THE DAWN OF LIFE
119
digestive liquid exuded from the enclosing mass into rounded
cavities or extemporised stomachs. Minute granules are seen
to circulate in the gelatinous interior, and may be substitutes
for blood-cells, and the outer layer of the body is capable of
protrusion in any direction into long processes, which are very
mobile, and used for locomotion and prehension. Further,
this creature, though destitute of most of the i)arts which we
are accustomed to regard as proper to animals, seems to exer-
cise volition, and to show the same appetites and passions with
animals of higher tyi)e. I have watched one of these animal-
FlG. 8. Amoeba. FiG. 9. Actinophrys.
From original sketches.
cules endeavouring to swallow a one-celled plant as long as its
own body; evidently hungry and eager to devour the tempting
morsel, it stretched itself to its full extent, trying to envelope
the object of its desire. It failed again and again ; but renewed
the attempt, until at length, convinced of its hopelessness, it
flung itself away as if in disappointment, and made off in search
of something more manageable. With the Amoeba are found
other types of equally simple Protozoa, but somewhat differently
S. E. 9
I20 THE DAWN OF LIFE
organized. One of these, Acfinofhrys (Fig. 9), has the body
globular and unchanging in form, the outer wall of greater thick-
ness ; the pulsating vesicle like a blister on the surface, and the
pseudopods long and thread-like. Its habits are similar to
those of the Amoeba, and I introduce it to show the variations
of form and structure possible even among these simple
creatures.
The Amoeba and Actinophrys are fresh-water animals, and
are destitute of any shell or covering. But in the sea there ex-
ist swarms of similar creatures, equally simple in organization,
but gifted with the power of secreting around their soft bodies
beautiful little shells or crusts of carbonate of lime, having one
orifice, and often in addition multitudes of microscopic pores
through which the soft gelatinous matter can ooze, and form
outside finger-like or thread-like extensions for collecting food.
In some cases the shell consists of a single cavity only, but in
most, after one cell is completed, others are added, forming
a series of cells or chambers communicating with each other,
and often arranged spirally or otherwise in most beautiful and
symmetrical forms. Some of these creatures, usually named
Foraminifera, are locomotive, others sessile and attached.
Most of them are microscopic, but some grow by multiplication
of chambers till they are a quarter of an inch or more in
breadth.
The original skeleton or primary cell wall of most of these
creatures is seen under the miscroscope to be perforated with
innumerable pores, and is extremely thin. When, however,
owing to the increaseol size of the shell, or other wants of the
creature, it is necessary to give strength, this is done by add-
ing new portions of carbonate of lime to the outside, and to
these Dr. Carpenter has given the appropriate name of " sup-
plemental skeleton " ; and this, when covered by new growths,
becomes what he has termed an " intermediate skeleton." The
supplemental skeleton is also traversed by tubes, but these are
THE DAWN OF LIFE 121
often of larger size than the pores of the cell-wall, and of
greater length, and branched in a complicated manner. Thus
there are microscopic characters by which these curious shells
can be distinguished from those of other marine animals ; and
by applying these characters we learn that multitudes of
creatures of this type have existed in former periods of the
world's history, and that their shells, accumulated in the bottom
of the sea, constitute large portions of many limestones. The
manner in which such accumulation takes place we learn from
what is now going on in the ocean, more especially from the
result of the recent deep-sea dredging expeditions. The
Foraminifera are vastly numerous, both near the surface and
at the bottom of the sea, and multiply rapidly ; and as suc-
cessive generations die, their shells accumulate on the ocean
bed, or are swept by currents into banks, and thus, in process
of time, constitute thick beds of white chalky material, which
may eventually be hardened into limestone. This process
is now depositing a great thickness of white ooze in the bottom
of the ocean ; and in times past it has produced such vast
thicknesses of calcareous matter as the chalk and nummulitic
limestone of Europe and the orbitoidal limestone of America.
The chalk which alone attains a maximum thickness of i,ooo
feet, and, according to Lyell, can be traced across Europe for
i,ioo geographical miles, may be said to be entirely composed
of shells of Foraminifera imbedded in a paste of smaller
calcareous bodies, the Coccoliths, which are probably products
of marine vegetable life, if not of some animal organism still
simpler than the Foraminifera.
Lastly, while we have in such modern forms as the masses
of Polytrema attached to corals, and the Loftusa of the
Eocene and the carboniferous, large fossil foraminiferal
species, there is some reason to believe that in the earlier geo-
logical ages there existed much larger animals of this grade
than are found in our present seas ; and that these, always
122 THE DAWN OF LIFE
sessile on the bottom, grew by the addition of successive
chambers, in the same manner with the smaller species.^
Let us, then, examine the structure of Eozoon, taking a
typical specimen, as we find it in the limestone of Grenville or
Petite Nation. In such specimens the skeleton of the animal
is represented by a white crystalline marble, the cavities of the
cells by green serpentine, the mode of whose introduction we
shall have to consider in the sequel. The lowest layer of ser-
pentine represents the first gelatinous coat of animal matter
which grew upon the bottom, and which, if we could have
seen it before any shell was formed upon its surface, must have
resembled a minute patch of living slime. On this primary
layer grew a delicate calcareous shell, perforated by innumer-
able minute tubuli, and resting on the slimy matter of the
animal, though supported also by some perpendicular plates or
septa. Upon this again was built up, in order to strengthen it,
a thickening or supplemental skeleton, more dense, and desti-
tute of fine tubuli, but traversed by branching canals, through
which the soft gelatinous matter could pass for the nourish-
ment of the skeleton itself, and the extension of pseudopods be-
yond it. (Figs. 11,12.) So was formed the first layer of Eozoon,
which probably was at its beginning only of very small dimen-
sions. On this the process of growth of successive layers of
animal sarcode and of calcareous skeleton w-as repeated again
and again, till in some cases even a hundred or more layers
were formed (nature-print. Chap. VI.) As the process went on,
however, the vitality of the organism became exhausted, prob-
ably by the deficient nourishment of the central and lower
layers making greater and greater demands on those above,
and so the succeeding layers became thinner, and less sup-
plemental skeleton was developed. Finally, toward the top,
the regular arrangement in layers was abandoned, and the cells
* I refer to some of the Stromatoporrc of the Silurian and the Cryptozoon
of the Cambrian. See note appended to this chapter.
THE DAWN OF LIFE
123
became a mass of rounded chambers, irregularly piled up in
what Dr. Carpenter has termed an "acervuline" manner, and
with very thin walls unprotected by supplemental skeleton.
Then the growth was arrested, and possibly these upper layers
gave off reproductive germs, fitted to float or swim away and
to establish new colonies. We may have such reproductive
germs in certain curious globular bodies, like loose cells, found
in connection with Eozoon in many of the Laurentian lime-
i:^/mm>
1 '/ 1/ -I
. .^ ' Ik
imm
Fig. 10. — Minute Foraminiferal forms from the Lnurcntiaii of Long
Lake. Highly magnified, {a) Single cell, showing tubulated wall. {^>, f)
Portions of same more highly magnified. (if) Serpentine cast of a
similar chamber, decalcified, and showing casts of tubuli.
stones.^ At St. Pierre, on the Ottawa, these bodies occur on
the surface of layers of the limestone in vast numbers, as if
they had been growing separately on the bottom, or had been
drifted over it by currents. They may have served as repro-
' It would be interesting to compare these bodies with the forms re-
cently found by Barrois and Cayeux in the "Azoic " quartzite of Brittany,
which should certainly now be called Eozoic.
124 THE DAWN OF LIFE
ductive buds or germs to establish new colonies of the species.
Such was the general mode of growth of Eozoon, and we may
now consider more in detail some questions as to its gigantic
size, its precise mode of nutrition, the arrangement of its
parts, its relations to more modern forms, and the effects of
its growth in the Laurentian seas.
, AVith respect to the size of Eozoon, this was rivalled by
some succeeding animals of the same humble type in later geo-
logical ages ; and, as a whole, foraminiferal animals have been
diminishing in size in the lapse of geological time. This is
indeed a fact of so frequent occurrence that it may almost be
regarded as a law of the introduction of new forms of life,
that they assume in their early history gigantic dimensions,
and are afterwards continued by less magnificent species. The
relations of this to external conditions, in the case of higher
animals, are often complex and difficult to understand ; but in
organisms so low as Eozoon and its allies, they lie more
on the surface. Such creatures may be regarded as the
simplest and most ready media for the conversion of vegetable
matter into animal tissues, and their functions are almost
entirely limited to those of nutrition. Hence it is likely tliat
they will be able to appear in the most gigantic forms under
such conditions as afford them the greatest amount of pabulum
for the nourishment of their soft parts and for their skeletons.
There is reason to believe, for example, that the occurrence,
both in the chalk and the deep-sea mud, of immense quanti-
ties of the minute bodies known as Coccoliths along with
P'oraminifera, is not accidental. The Coccoliths appear to be
grains of calcareous matter formed in minute plants adapted
to a deep-sea habitat ; and these, along with the vegetable
and animal debris constantly being derived from the death of
the living things at the surface, afford the material both of
sarcode and shell. Now if the Laurentian graphite represents
an exuberance of vegetable growth in those old seas propor-
THE DAWN OF LIFE I25
tionate to the great supplies of carbonic acid in the atmosphere
and in the waters, and if the Eozoic ocean was even better
supphed with salts of lime than those Silurian seas whose vast
limestones bear testimony to their richness in such material,
we can easily imagine that the conditions may have been more
favourable to a creature like Eozoon than those of any other
period of geological time.
Growing, as Eozoon did, on the floor of the ocean, and
covering wide patches with more or less irregular masses, it
must have thrown up from its whole surface its pseudopods
to seize whatever floating particles of food the waters carried
over it. There is also reason to believe, from the outline of
certain specimens, that it often grew upward in conical or club-
shaped forms, and that the broader patches were penetrated by
large pits or oscula, admitting the sea-water deeply into the
substance of the masses. In this way its growth might be
rapid and continuous ; but it does not seem to have possessed
the power of growing indefinitely by new and living layers
covering those that had died, in the manner of some corals. Its
life seems to have had a definite termination, and when that
was reached, an entirely new colony had to be commenced.
In this it had more affinity with the Foraminifera, as we now
know them, than with the corals, though practically it had the
same power with the coral polyps of accumulating limestone
in the sea bottom^a power indeed still possessed by its fora-
miniferal successors. In the case of coral limestones we
know that a large proportion of these consist not of continuous
reefs, but of fragments of coral mixed with other calcareous
organisms, spread usually by waves and currents in continuous
beds over the sea bottom. In like manner we find in the
limestones containing Eozoon, layers of fragmental matter
which show in places the characteristic structures, and which
evidently represent the debris swept from the Eozoic masses
and reefs by the action of the waves. It is with this frag-
126 THE DAWN OF LIFE
mental matter that the small rounded organisms already re-
ferred to most frequently occur ; and while they may be
distinct animals, they may also be the fry of Eozoon, or small
portions of its acer\-uline upper surface floated off in a living
state, and possibly capable of living independently and of
founding new colonies.
It is only by a somewhat wild poetical licence that Eozoon
has been represented as a " kind of enormous composite
animal stretching from the shores of Labrador to Lake
Superior, and thence northward and southward to an unknown
distance, and forming masses 1,500 feet in depth."' We may,
it is true, readily believe in the composite nature of masses of
Eozoon, and we see in the corals evidence of the great size to
which composite animals of a higher grade can attain. In the
case of Eozoon we must imagine an ocean floor more uniform
and level than that now existing. On this the organism would
establish itself in spots and patches. These might finally be-
come confluent over large areas, just as massive corals do.
As individual masses attained maturity and died, their pores
would be filled up with limestone or silicious deposits, and
thus could form a solid basis for new generations, and in this
way limestone to an indefinite extent might be produced.
Further, wherever such masses were high enough to be
attacked by the breakers, or v.here portions of the sea bottom
were elevated, the more fragile parts of the surface would
be broken up and scattered widely in beds of fragments over
the bottom of the sea, while here and there beds of mud or
sand, or of volcanic debris would be deposited over the li\ing
or dead organic mass, and would form the layers of gneiss
and other schistose rocks interstratified with the Laurentian
limestone. In this way, in short, Eozoon would perform a
function combining that which corals and Foraminifera perform
in the modern seas ; forming both reef limestones and exten-
sive chalky beds, and probably living both in the shallow and
THE DAWN OF LTFE 12/
the deeper parts of the ocean. If in connection with this we
consider the rapidity with which the soft, simple, and almost
structureless sarcode of these Protozoa can be built up, and
the probability that they were more abundantly supplied with
food, both for nourishing their soft parts and skeletons, than
any similar creatures in later times, we can readily understand
the great volume and extent of the Laurentian limestones
which they aided in producing. I say aided in producing,
because I would not care to commit myself to the doctrine
that the Laurentian limestones are wholly of this origin.
There may have been other limestone builders than Eozoon,
w
Fig. II. — Section of a Niimmulite, from Eocene Limestone of Syria.
Showing chambers, tubuli, and canals. Compare this and Fig. 12 witli Fig.
7 and Nature-print of Eozoon.
and there may have been limestones formed by plants like the
modern Nulliporcs, or by merely mineral deposition.
Its relations to modern animals of its type have been very
clearly defined by Dr. Carpenter. In the structure of its
proper wall and its fine parallel perforations, it resembles the
NuvuHuUtes and their allies ; and the organism may therefore
be regarded as an aberrant member of the Nummuline group,
which affords some of the largest and most widely distributed
of the fossil Foraminifera. This resemblance may be seen in
Fig. II. To the Nummulites it also conforms in its tendency
to form a supplemental or intermediate skeleton with canals,
128
THE DAWN OF LIFE
though the canals themselves in the arrangement more nearly
resemble Calcarina, which is represented in Fig. 12. In its
superposition of many layers, and in its tendency to a heaped
up or acervuline irregular growth it resembles Fofyfrema and
Tinoporus, forms of a different group in so far as shell-struc-
ture is concerned. It may thus be regarded as a composite
type, combining peculiarities now observed in two groups, or
it may be regarded as representing one of these in another
series. At the time when Ur. Carpenter stated these
1lk
Fig. 12. — Portion of shell of Calcarina. Magnified, after Carpenter.
{a) Cells. (i>) Original cell wall with tubuli. (<) Supplementary
skeleton with canals.
affinities, it might be objected that P'oraminifera of these
families are in the main found in the modern and Tertiary
periods. Dr. Carpenter has since shown that the curious oval
Foraminifer called Fusuli)ia, found in the coal formation, is
alHed to both Nummulites and Rotalines ; and Mr. Brady has
discovered a true Numnuilite in the Lower Carboniferous of
Belgium. I have myself found small Foraminifera in the
Silurian and Cambro-Silurian of C'anada. This group being
THE DAWN OF LIFE 1 29
now brought down to the Palaeozoic, we may hope to trace it to
the Primordial, and thus to bring it still nearer to Eozoon in time.
Though Eozoon was probably not the only animal of the
Laurentian seas, yet it was in all likelihood the most con-
spicuous and important as a collector of calcareous matter,
filling the same place afterwards occupied by the reef-building
corals. Though probably less efficient than these as a con-
structor of solid limestones, from its less permanent and con-
tinuous growth, it formed wide floors and patches on the
sea bottom, and when these were broken up, vast quantities of
limestone were formed from their debris. It must also be borne
in mind that Eozoon was not everywhere infiltrated with ser-
pentine or other silicious minerals ; quantities of its substance
were merely filled with carbonate of lime, resembling the
chamber w'all so closely that it is nearly impossible to make out
the difference, and thus is likely to pass altogether unobserved
by collectors, and to baffle even the microscopist. Although,
therefore, the layers which contain well characterised Eozoon
are few and far between, there is reason to believe that in the
composition of the limestones of the Laurentian it bore no
small part, and as these limestones are some of them several
hundred feet in thickness, and extend over vast areas, Eozoon
may be supposed to have been as efficient a world-builder as
the Stromatoporae of the Silurian and Devonian, the Globi-
gerinas and their allies in the chalk, or the Nummulites
and Miliolites in the Eocene. It is a remarkable illustration
of the constancy of natural causes and of the persistence of
animal types, that these humble Protozoans, which began to
secrete calcareous matter in the Laurentian period, have been
continuing their work in the ocean through all the geological
ages, and are still busy in accumulating those chalky muds with
which recent dredging operations in the deep sea have made
us so familiar. (See Note appended.)
All this seems sufficiently reasonalile, more especially since
130 THE DAWN OF LIFE
no mineralogist has yet succeeded in giving a feasible inor-
ganic explanation of the combination of canals, lamince, tubu-
lation and varied mineral character existing in Eozoon.
But then comes the strange fact of its apparent isolation with-
out companions in highl}' crystalline rocks, and with appa-
rently no immediate successors. This has staggered many,
and it certainly, if taken thus baldly, seems in some degree
improbable. Recent discoveries, however, are removing this
reproach from Eozoon. The Laurentian rocks have yielded
other varieties, or perhaps species of the genus, those which I
have described as variety Acervulina, and variety Minor, and
still another form, more like a Stromatopora, which I have
provisionally named E. /afior, from the breadth and uniformity
of its plates.^ There are also in the Laurentian limestone
cylindrical bodies apparently originally tubular, and with the
sides showing radiating markings in the manner of corals, or
of the curious Cambrian Arch?eocyathus. Matthew, a most
careful observer, has found in the Laurentian limestone of
New Brunswick certain laminated bodies of cylindrical form,
constituting great reefs in the limestone, and in the slates
linear flat objects resembling Algcc or Graptolites, and spicular
structures resembling those of sponges.- Britton has also de-
scribed from the Laurentian limestone of New Jersey certain
ribbon-like objects of graphite which he regards as vegetable,
and names Ar-chceophyton Newberryii? Should these objects
prove to be organic, Eozoon will no longer be alone. Besides
this the peculiar bodies named Cryptozoum by Hall, and which
are intermediate in structure between Eozoon and Loftusia,
have now been found as low as the Lower Cambrian.' Barrois
* Notes on .Specimens of Eozoon, " .Memoirs of Peter Reilp.TlIi Museum,"'
1 888.
2 Bid. Nat. Hist. New Brunsioick, No. IX., 1S90.
•" Annals N.Y. Academy of Science, 18SS.
^ Walcolt, Lower Cambrian, 1892.
THE DAWN OF LIFE 131
has also recently announced the discovery of forms which he
regards as akin to the modern Radiolaria, creatures of a little
higher grade than the Foraminifera, in the " Archgean " rocks
of Brittany.^ Thus Eozoon is no longer isolated, but has
companions of the same great age with itself. The progress of
discovery is also daily carrying the life of the Cambrian to
lower beds, and thus nearer to the Laurentian. It is not un-
likely that in a few years a pre-Cambrian fauna will force itself
on the attention of the most sceptical geologists.
References: — "Life's Da\sn on Earth," London, 1875. (^'o\v out of
print.) "Specimens of Eozoon Canadense in the Peter Redpath
Museum, Montreal," 1S88. (This memoir contains reference to pre-
vious papers.)
^ Natural Science, Oct., 1892.
Appended Notes.
1. Stromatopora-. — It has been usual of late to regard these as allies of
the modern Millepores and HydrsetiniEe ; but careful study of large series
of specimens has convinced me that some species, notably the Stroinalo-
cerium of the Cambro-Silurian and the cryptozoum of the Cambrian,
cannot be so referred. I hope to establish this in the future, if time
permit.
2. Modern Foraminifera. — The discovery by Brady and Lister of
reproductive chamberlets at the margin of the modern orbitolites, tends to
connect this with Eozoon. The gigantic foraminiferal species discovered
by Agassiz at the Gallipagos, has points of affinity with Eozoon ; and its
arenaceous nature does not affect this, as we know sandy species in this
group closely allied to others that are calcareous.
WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON.
DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF
DR. WILLIAM B. CARPENTER,
Who, among his many Services to Science,
devoted much time and labour to the investigation
OF EoZOON,
AND BY HIS Knowledge of Foraminifera
AND unrivalled POWER OF UNRAVELLING DIFFICULT
Structures
DID much to Render it Intelligible.
The Microscope in Geology — Contributions of the
Study of Eozoon to our Kno\vledce of the Mode
OF Preservation of Fossils — Its Teaching Rela-
tively to the Origin of Life and the Laws of its
Introduction and Progress
S. E.
Specimen ok Eozoon Canadense (Dawson), showing Genera) Fori
and Osculiform Tubes, (Reproduced from Photograph.)
CHAPTER VI.
WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON.
THE microscope has long been a recognised and valued
aid of the geological observer, and is perhaps now in
danger of being somewhat overrated by enthusiastic specialists.
To the present writer its use is no novelty. When, as a very
young geologist, collecting fossil plants in the coal fields of
Novia Scotia, I obtained access to the then recently published
work of Witham on the " Internal Structure of Fossil Vege-
tables." ^ Fired by the desire to learn something of the structure
of the blocks of fossil wood in my collection, I at once procured
a microscope of what would now be considered a very im-
perfect kind, and proceeded to make attempts to slice and
examine my specimens, and was filled with joy when these
old blackened stems for the first time revealed to me their
wonderful structures. At the same time I extended my
studies to every minute form of life that could be obtained
from the sea or fresh waters. A few years later (in 1841), when
a student in Edinburgh, I made the acquaintance of Mr.
Sanderson of that city, who had worked for Nicol and Witham
in the preparation of specimens, and learnt the modes which he
had employed. Since that time I have been accustomed to
subject every rock, earth or fossil which came under my notice
to microscopic scrutiny, not as a mere specialist in that mode
of observation, or with the parade of methods and details now
customary, but with the view of obtaining valuable facts bear-
' Edinburgh, 1 833.
I3S
136 WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON
ing on any investigation I might have in hand. It was this
habit which induced my old friend, Sir William Logan, in 1858
and subsequent years to ask my aid in the study of the forms
believed or suspected to be organic, which had been discovered
in the course of his surveys of the Laurentian rocks. In one
respect this was unfortunate. It occupied much time, inter-
fered to some extent with other researches, led to unpleasant
controversies. But these evils were more than compensated by
the insight which the study gave into the fact of the persistence
of organic structures in highly crystalline rocks, and to the
modes of ascertaining and profiting by these obscure remains,
while it has guided and stimulated enquiry and thought as to
the origin and history of life. These benefits entitle the re-
searches and discussions on Eozoon to be regarded as marking
a salient point in the history of geological discovery, and it is
to these principally that I would attract attention in the pre-
sent chapter.
Perhaps nothing excites more scepticism as to the animal
nature of Eozoon than the prejudice existing among geologists
that no organism can be preserved in rocks so highly crystalline
as those of the Laurentian series. I call this a prejudice, be-
cause any one who makes the microscopic structure of rocks
and fossils a special study, soon learns that fossils and the
rocks containing them may undergo the most remarkable and
complete mechanical and chemical changes without losing
their minute structure, and that limestones, if once fossiliferous,
are hardly ever so much altered as to lose all traces of the
organisms which they contained, while it is a most common
occurrence to find highly crystalline rocks of this kind abound-
ing in fossils preserved as to their minute structure.
Let us, however, look at the precise conditions under which
this takes place.
When calcareous fossils of irregular surface and porous or
cellular texture, such as Eozoon may have been, or corals were
WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON 1 37
and are, become imbedded in clay, marl, or other soft sedi-
ment, they can be washed out and recovered in a condition
similar to that of recent specimens, except that their pores or
cells, if open, may be filled with the material of the matrix, or
if not so open that they can be thus filled, they may be more
or less incrusted with mineral deposits introduced by water
percolating the mass, or may even be completely filled up in
this way. But if such fossils are contained in hard rocks, they
usually fail, when these are broken, to show their external sur-
faces, and, breaking across with the containing rock, they ex-
hibit their internal structure merely, — and this more or less
distinctly, according to the manner in which their cells or
cavities have been filled with mineral matter. Here the
microscope becomes of essential senice, especially when the
structures are minute. A fragment of fossil wood which to
the naked eye is nothing but a dark stone, or a coral which is
merely a piece of grey or coloured marble, or a specimen of
common cr)'stalline limestone made up originally of coral frag-
ments, presents, when sliced and magnified, the most perfect
and beautiful structure. In such cases it will be found that
ordinarily the original substance of the fossil remains in a more
or less altered state. Wood may be represented by dark lines
of coaly matter, or coral by its white or transparent calcareous
lamince; while the material which has been introduced, and
which fills the cavities, may so differ in colour, transparency, or
crystallization, as to act differently on light, and so reveal the
original structure. These fillings are very curious. Sometimes
they are mere earthy or muddy matter which has been washed
into the ca^■ities. Sometimes they are transparent and cr}stal-
line. Often they are stained with oxide of iron or coaly
materials. They may consist of carbonate of lime, silica or
silicates, sulphate of bar)ta, oxides of iron, carbonate of iron,
iron pyrite, or sulphides of copper or lead, all of which are
common materials. They are sometimes so complicated that
138 WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON
I have seen even the minute cells of woody structures, each
with several bands of differently coloured materials deposited
in succession, like the coats of an onyx agate.
A further stage of mineralisation occurs when the substance
of the organism is altogether removed and replaced by foreign
matter, either little by little, or by being entirely dissolved or
decomposed, leaving a cavity to be filled by infiltration. In
this state are some silicified woods, and those corals which
have been not filled with but replaced by silica, and can thus
sometimes be obtained entire and perfect by the solution in
an acid of the containing limestone, or by its removal in
weathering. In this state are the beautiful silicified corals ob-
tained from the corniferous limestone of Lake Erie, which are
so perfectly replaced by flinty matter that when weathered out
of the limestone, or treated with acid till the latter is removed,
we find the coral as perfect as when recent. It may be well
to present to the eye these different stages of fossilization. I
have attempted to do this in Fig. 13, taking a tabulate coral of
the genus Favosites for an example, and supposing the material
employed to be calcite and silica. Precisely the same illustra-
tion would apply to a piece of wood, except that the cell wall
would be carbonaceous matter instead of carbonate of lime.
In this figure the dotted parts represent carbonate of lime,
the diagonally shaded parts silica or a silicate. Thus we have
in the natural state the walls of carbonate of lime and the
cavities empty (a). When fossilized the cavities may be merely
filled with carbonate of lime, or they may be filled with silica
((^, c) ; or the walls themselves may be replaced by silica, and
the cavities may remain filled with carbonate of lime (d) ; or
both the walls and cavities may be represented by or filled
with silica or silicates (r). The ordinary specimens of Eozoon
are supposed to be in the third of these stages, though some
exist in the second, and I have reason to believe that some
have reached to the fifth. I have not met with any in the
WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON
139
fourth stage, though this is not uncommon in Silurian and
Devonian fossils. I have further to remark that the reason
why wood and the cells of corals so readily become silicified is
that the organic matter which they contain, becoming oxidized
in decay, produces carbon dioxide, which, by its affinity for
alkalies, can decompose soluble silicates and thus throw down
their silica in an insoluble state. Thus a fragment of decay-
ing wood imbedded in a deposit holding water and alkaline
silicates almost necessarily becomes silicified. It is also to be
remarked that the ordinary specimens of Eozoon have actually
not attained to the extreme degree of mineralization seen in
some much more recent silicified woods and corals, inasmuch
a
i:L_.
'.'I'm ,
c-
r A
ri
rr=cr
Fk;. 13.- — Diagram sliowiiig different States of Fossilization of a cell of
a Tul)ulate Coral, {a) Natural condition — -walls calcite, cell empty. (l>)
\N'alis calcite, cell filled with the same, (c) Walls calcite, cell filled with
silica or silicate, (d) Walls silicified, cell filled with calcite. {c) Walls
silicified, cell filled with silica or silicate.
as the portion believed to have been the original calcareous
test has not usually been silicified, but still remains in the state
of calcium carbonate.
With regard, then, to the calcareous organisms with which we
have now more especially to do, when these are embedded in
pure limestone and filled with the same, so that the whole rock,
fossils and cavities, is one in composition, and when meta-
morphic action has caused the whole to become crystalline,
and has perhaps removed the remains of carbonaceous matter,
it may be very difficult to detect any traces of structure. But
140 WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON
even in this case careful management of light may reveal some
indications. In many instances, however, even where the
limestones have become perfectly crystalline, and the cleavage
planes cut freely across the fossils, these exhibit their forms
and minute structures in great perfection. This is the case in
many of the Lower Silurian limestones of Canada, as I have
elsewhere shown. ^ The grey crystalline Trenton limestone of
Montreal, used as a building stone, is an excellent illustration.
To the naked eye it is a grey marble composed of cleavable
crystals ; but when examined in thin slices, it shows its or-
ganic fragments in the greatest beauty, and all their minute
parts are perfectly marked out by delicate carbonaceous lines.
The only exception in this limestone is in the case of the
crinoids, in which the cellular structure is filled with trans-
parent calc-spar, perfectly identical with the original solid
matter, so that they appear solid and homogeneous, but there
are examples in which even the minute meshes of these become
apparent. The specimen represented in Fig. 14 is a mass of
Corals, Polyzoa, and Crinoids, and shows these under a low
power, as represented in the figure. The specimen in Fig. 15
shows the Faurentian Eozoon in a similar state of preservation.
It is from a sketch by Dr. Carpenter, and exhibits the delicate
canals partly filled with calcite or dolomite, as clear and colour-
less as that of the shell itself, and distinguishable only by careful
management of the light.
In the case of recent and fossil Foraminifers, these very
frequently have their chambers filled solid with calcareous
matter, and as Dr. Carpenter well remarks, even well preserved
Tertiary Nummulites in this state often fail greatly in showing
their structures, though in the same condition they occasionally
show these in great perfection. Among the finest I have seen
are specimens from tlie Mount of Olives, and Dr. Carpenter
' Canadian Naturalist, 1S59 : "Microscopic Structure of C.anatlian
Limestones."
WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON
141
mentions as equally good those of the London clay at Brackle-
sham. But in no condition do modern Foraminifera, or those
of the Tertiary and Mesozoic rocks appear in greater perfection
than when filled with the hydrous silicate of iron and potash
Fig. 14. — Slice of Crystalline Lower Silurian Limestone ; showing
Crinoicls, Bryozoa, and Corals in fragments.
f^^^rZCR^J^IS^^^Uj
Fig. 15. — Walls of Eozoon penetrated with Canals. The unshaded
portions filled with Calcite. (After Carpenter.)
called glauconite or green earth, a substance now forming in
some parts of the ocean, and which gives, by the abundance of
its little bottle-green concretions the name of " greensand " to
formations of the Cretaceous age both in Europe and America.
142 WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON
In some beds of greensand every grain seems to have been
moulded into the interior of a microscopic shell, and has re-
tained its form after the frail envelope has been removed. In
some cases the glauconite has not only filled the chambers
but has penetrated the fine tubulation, and when the shell is
removed, either naturally or by the action of an acid, the
silicious fillings of the interior of the tubes project in
minute needles or bundles of threads of marvellous delicacy
from the surface of the cast. It is in the warmer seas, and
especially in the bed of the Egean and of the Gulf Stream, that
such specimens are now most usually found.' If we ask why
this mineral glauconite should be associated with foraminiferal
shells, the answer is that they are both products of one kind
of locality. The same sea bottoms in which Foraminifera
most abound are also those in which the chemical conditions
for the formation of glauconite exist. Hence, no doubt, the
association of this mineral with the great foraminiferal forma-
tion of the chalk. It is indeed by no means unlikely that the
selection by these creatures of the pure carbonate of lime from
the sea water or its minute plants, may be the means of setting
free the silica, iron, and potash, in a state suitable for their
combination. Similar silicates are found associated with
marine limestones, as far back as the Cambro-Silurian age ;
and Dr. Sterry Hunt, than whom no one can be a better
authority on chemical geology, has argued on chemical grounds
that the occurrence of serpentine with the remains of Eozoon
is an association of the same character.
However this may be, the infiltration of the pores of Eozoon
with serpentine and other silicates has evidently been one main
means of its i)reservation. When so infiltrated no meta-
mori)hism short of the complete fusion of the containing rock
' Ikautiful specimens of Numnnilites preseived in this way, from tlie
Eocene of Kumpfen in 15avaria, have been comnninicated to me lliiougli the
kindness of Dr. Otto Hahn.
WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON I43
could obliterate the minutest points of structure ; and that
such fusion has not occurred, the preservation in the Laurentian
rocks of the most delicate lamination of the beds shows con-
clusively ; while, as already stated, it can be shown that the
alteration which has occurred might have taken place at a
temperature far short of that necessary to fuse limestone.
Thus has it happened that these most ancient fossils have
been handed down to our time in a state of preservation com-
parable, as Dr. Carpenter states, to that of the best preserved
fossil Foraminifera from the more recent formations that have
come under his observation in the course of all his long ex-
perience.
Let us now look more minutely at the nature of the typical
specimens of Eozoon as originally observed and described, and
then turn to those preserved in other ways, or more or less de-
stroyed or defaced. Taking a polished specimen from Petite
Nation, we find the shell represented by white limestone, and
the chambers by light green serpentine. By acting on the
surface with a dilute acid we etch out the calcareous part,
leaving a cast in serpentine of the cavities originally occupied
by the soft animal substance, and when this is done in polished
slices, these may be made to print their own characters on
l)aper, as has actually been done in the plate prefixed, which
is an electrotype from an etched specimen, and shows both
the laminated and acervuline parts of the fossil. If the pro-
cess of decalcification has been carefully executed, we find in
the excavated spaces delicate ramifying processes of opaque
serpentine or transparent dolomite, which were originally im-
bedded in the calcareous substance, and which are often of
extreme fineness and complexity.^ (Figs. 18, 19.) These are
casts of the canals which traversed the shell when still inhabited
by the animal, and have subsequently been filled with mineral
• Very fine specimens can be produced by polishing thin slices, and then
etching them slightly with a very weak acid. (Plate prefixed.)
144 WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON
matter. In evidence of this we sometimes find in a single canal
an outer tubular layer of serpentine and an inner filling of
dolomite, just as vessels of fossil plants are sometimes filled
with successive coats of different materials. In some well
preserved specimens we find the original cell wall represented
by a delicate white film, which under the microscope shows
minute needle-like parallel processes representing its still finer
tubuli. It is evident that to have filled these tubuli, the ser-
pentine must have been introduced in a state of actual solution,
and must have carried with it no foreign impurities. Conse-
quently we find that in the chambers themselves the serpentine
is pure ; and if we examine it under polarized light, we see that
it presents a singularly curdled or irregularly laminated appear-
ance, as if it had an imperfectly crystalline structure, and had
been deposited in irregular lamince, beginning at the sides of
the chambers, and filling them toward the middle, and had
afterward been cracked by shrinkage, and the cracks filled with
a second deposit of serpentine.^ Now, serpentine is a hydrous
silicate of magnesia, and all that we need to suppose is that in
the waters of the Laurentian sea magnesia was present instead
of iron, alumina or potash, and we can understand that the
Laurentian fossil has been petrified by infiltration with ser-
pentine, as more modern Foraminifera have been with glaucon-
ite, which, though it does not contain magnesia, often has a
considerable percentage of alumina. Further, in specimens of
Eozoon from Burgess, the filling mineral is loganite, a com-
pound of silica, alumina, magnesia and iron with water, while
in other specimens the filling mineral is pyroxene. In like
' The same structures may be well seen in ihin slices polished, to be
viewed as transparent objects. I may, however, explain tliat if these are
made roughly, and lieated in the process, they may often show only
mineral structures and cleavage planes, whereas, if polished with great care
and slowly, and afterwards cleaned with an acid, they may show tlic
canals in great perfection.
WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON I45
manner, in certain Silurian limestones from New Brunswick
and Wales, in which the delicate microscopic pores of the
skeletons of stalked starfishes or crinoids have been filled with
mineral deposits, so that when decalcified these are most beau-
tifully represented by their casts, Dr. Hunt has proved the filling
mineral to be ^ intermediate between serpentine and glauconite.
We have, therefore, ample warrant for adhering to his con-
FiG. 16. — ^Joint of a Crinoid, having its Pores injected with a Hydrous
Silicate. Upper Silurian Limestone, Pole Hill, New Brunswick. Magni-
fied 25 diameters.
elusion that the Laurentian serpentine was deposited under
conditions similar to those of the modern greensand. Indeed,
independently of Eozoon, it is impossible that any geologist
who has studied the manner in which this mineral is associated
with the Laurentian limestones could believe it to have been
* Silicate of alumina, iron, magnesia, and potash.
146
WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON
formed in any other way. Nor need we be astonished at the
fineness of the infiltration by which these minute tubes, perhaps
Tooo 0 of ^" '"^h i"^ diameter, are filled with mineral matter.
The micro-geologist well knows how, in more modern deposits,
the finest pores of fossils are filled, and that mineral matter in
solution can penetrate the smallest openings that the micro-
scope can detect. Wherever the fluids of the living body can
penetrate, there also mineral substances can be carried, and
^'"/,VM
ir
Fig. 17.— Shell from a Silurian Limestone, Wales ; its cavity filled with
Hydrous Silicate. Magnified 25 diameters.
tliis natural injection, effected under great pressure and with
the advantage of ample time, can surpass any of the feats of
the anatomical manipulator. Fig. 16 represents a microscopic
joint of a Crinoid from the Upper Silurian of New Brunswick,
injected with the hydrous silicate already referred to, and Fig.
17 shows a microscopic chambered or spiral shell, from a
Welsh Silurian limestone, with its cavities filled with a similar
substance.
Taking the specimens preserved by serpentine as typical, we
now turn to certain other and, in some respects, less character-
WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON
147
istic specimens, which are nevertheless very instructive. At
the Calumet some of the masses are partly filled with serpen-
tine and partly with white pyroxene, an anhydrous silicate of
lime and magnesia. The two minerals can readily be distin-
guished when viewed with polarized light ; and in some slices
I have seen part of a chamber or group of canals filled with
Fig. iS. — Casts of Canals of Eozoon in Serpentine, decalcified and highly
magnified.
Fin. 19. — Canals of Eozoon. Highly Magnified.
serpentine and part with pyroxene. In this case the pyroxene,
or the materials which now compose it, must have been intro-
duced by infiltration, as well as the serpentine. This is the
more remarkable as pyroxene is most usually found as an in-
gredient of igneous rocks ; but Dr. Hunt has shown that in the
Laurentian limestones, and also in veins traversing them, it
IX:> WHAT ilAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOOX
occurs under conditions which imply its deposition from water,
either cold or warm. Gombel remarks on this : — " Hmit, in a
Tarr ingenious manner, compares this formation and deposition
of serpentine, pyroxene and loganite, with that of glauconite,
whose formation has gone on uninterruptedly from the Silurian
to the Tertiary period, and is even now taking place in the
depths of the sea ; it being well known that Ehrenberg and
others have already shown that many of the grains of glauconite
are casts of the intmor of foraminiferal shells. In the light of
parison, the notion that the serpentine and such-like
: of the primitive limestones have been formed, in a
similar niannerj in the chambers of Eozoic Foraminifera, loses
any traces of improbability which it might at first seem to
possess."
In many ports of the skeleton of Eozoon, and even in the
best infiltrated serpentine specimens, there are portions of the
cell wall and canal system which have been filled with cal-
careous ^)ar or with dolomite, so similar to the skeleton that it
ran be detected only under the most favourable lights and
with great care (Fig. 15, supra). It is further to be remarked
that in al the specimens of true Eozoon, as well as in many
'"'""-" -/[careous fossils preserved in ancient rocks, the cal-
- .".latter, even when its minute structures are not pre-
served, or are obscured, presents a minutely granular or curdled
appearance, arising, no doubt, from the original presence of
organic matter, and not recognised in purely inorganic
cakxte.
Other specimens of fragmental Eozoon 'from the Petite
Natkm localities have thdr canals filled with dolomite, which
probably penetrated them after they were broken up and im-
bedded \xx the rocL I have ascertained, with respect to these
firagments of Eozoon, that they occur abundandy in certain
layers of the Laurentian limestone, beds of some thickness
beii^ in great part made up of them, and coarse and fine frag-
WHAT iL\Y BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON 149
molts occur in altanate Livers, lite the broken corals in sorae
Silurian limestones.
Finally, on this part of the subject, careful obsaration of
many specimens of Laurentian limestone which present no
trace of Eozoon when viewed by the naked eye. and no evi-
dence of structure when acted on with acids, are nevertheless
organic, and consist of fragments of Eozoon, and possibly of
other organisms, not infiltrated with silicates, but only with
carbonate of hme, and consequendy revealing only obscure
indications of their minute structure. I have satisfied myself
of this by long and patient investigations, which scarcely admit
of any adequate representation, either by words or figures.
Even,- worker m those applications of the microscope to
geological specimens which have been termed micro-geology, is
familiar with the fiict that crvstaHine forces and mechanical
movements of material often play the most tintastic tricks with
fossihzed organic matter. In fossil woods, for example, we
otten have the tissues disorganized, with radiating crvstaHiza-
tions of calcite and little spherical concretions of quartz, or dis-
seminated cubes and grains of pyrite, or Htde veins filled with
sulphate of barium or other minerals. We need no^ therefore,
be surprised to find that in the venerable rocks rnnrnming
Eozoon. such things occur in the highly crysmllfne Laurentian
Umestoaes, and even in some still showing the traces of Eozoon.
We find many disseminated crystals of magnetite, pyrite,
spineL mica and other minerals, curiously curved prisms of
vermicular mica, bundles of aciculi of tremohte and similar
substances, veins of calcite and crysodle or fibrous serpentine,
which often traverse the best specimens. WTiere these occur
abundantly, we usually find no organic structures remaining, or
if they exist, they are in a very defective state of preservaaon.
Even in specimens presentingt he lamination of Eozoon to the
naked eye. these crystalline actions have often destroyei the
minute structure : and I fear that some micrcscopists have
S. E. H
I50 WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON
been victimized, by having under their consideration only
specimens in which the actual characters had been too much
defaced to be discernible. No mistake can be greater than to
suppose that any and every specimen of Laurentian limestone
must contain Eozoon. More especially have I hitherto failed
to detect traces of it in those carbonaceous or graphitic lime-
stones which are so very abundant in the Laurentian country.
Perhaps where vegetable matter was very plentiful Eozoon did
not thrive, or, on the other hand, the growth of Eozoon may
have diminished the quantity of vegetable matter. It is also
to be observed that much compression and distortion have oc-
curred in the beds of Laurentian limestone and their contained
fossils, and also that the specimens are often broken by faults,
some of which are so small as to appear only on microscopic
examination, and to shift the plates of the fossil just as if they
were beds of rock. This, though it sometimes produces
puzzling appearances, is an evidence that the fossils were hard
and brittle when this faulting took place, and is consecjuently
an additional proof of their extraneous origin. Li some speci-
mens it would seem that the lower and older part of the fossil
had been wholly converted into serpentine or pyroxene, or had
so nearly experienced this change that only small parts of the
calcareous wall can be recognised. These portions correspond
with fossil woods altogether silicified, not only by the filling of
the cells, but also by the conversion of the walls into silica. I
have specimens which manifestly show the transition from the
ordinary condition of filling with serpentine to one in which
the cell-walls are represented obscurely by one shade vi this
mineral and the cavities by another. In general, however, it
will be gathered from the above explanations that the specimens
of Eozoon fall short in thoroughness of mineralization of some
fossils in much more modern rocks. I have specimens of
ancient sponges whose spicular skeletons, originally silicious,
have been replaced by pyrite or bisulphide of iron, and of
WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON 15I
Tertiary fossil woods retaining perfectly their most minute struc-
tures, yet entirely replaced by silica, so that not a particle of
the original wood remains.
The above considerations as to mode of preservation of
Eozoon concur with those in the previous chapter in showing
its oceanic character, if really a fossil ; but the ocean of the
Eozoic period may not have been so deep as at present, and its
waters were probably warm and well stocked with mineral
matters derived from the newly formed land, or from hot
springs in its own bottom. On this point the interesting in-
vestigations of Dr. Hunt with reference to the chemical con-
ditions of the Silurian seas allow us to suppose that the Lau-
rentian ocean may have been much more richly stored, more
especially with salts of lime and magnesia, than that of subse-
quent times. Hence the conditions of warmth, light, and nutri-
ment required by such gigantic Protozoans would all be present,
and hence, also, no doubt, some of the peculiarities of their
mineralization.
I desire by the above statement of facts to show, on the one
hand, that the study of Eozoon, regarded as probably an ancient
form of marine life, aids us in understanding other ancient
fossils, and their manner of preservation ; and on the other hand,
that those who deny the organic origin of Eozoon place us in
the position of being unable, in any rational manner, to account
for these forms, so characteristic of the Laurentian limestones,
and set at naught the fair conclusions deducible from the mode
of preservation of fossils in the later formations. The evidence
of organic origin is perhaps not conclusive, and in the present
state of knowledge it is certain to be met with much scepticism,
more especially by certain classes of specialists, whose grasp of
knowledge is not sufficiently wide to cover, on the one hand,
fossilization and metamorphism, and on the other, to under-
stand the lower forms of life. It may, however, be sufficient to
qualify us in turning our thoughts for a few moments to con-
152 WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON
siderations suggested by the probable origin of animal life in
the seas of the Laurentian period.
Looking down from the elevation of our physiological and
mental superiority, it is difficult to realize the exact conditions
in which life exists in creatures so simple as the Protozoa.
There may perhaps be higher intelligences, that find it equally
difficult to realize how life and reason can manifest themselves
in such poor houses of clay as those we inhabit. But placing
ourselves near to these creatures, and entering, as it were, into
sympathy with them, we can understand something of their
powers and feelings. In the first place it is plain that they
can vigorously, if roughly, exercise those mechanical, chemical,
and vegetative powers of life which are characteristic of the
animal. They can seize, swallow, digest, and assimilate food ;
and, employing its albuminous parts in nourishing their
tissues, can burn away the rest in processes akin to our respi-
ration, or reject it from their system. Like us, they can sub-
sist only on food which the plant has previously produced ;
for in this world, from the beginning of time, the plant has
been the only organism which could use the solar light and
heat as forces to enable it to turn the dead elements of matter
into living, growing tissues, and into organic compounds
capable of nourishing the animal. Like us, the Protozoa ex-
pend the food which they have assimilated in the production
of animal force, and in doing so cause it to be oxidized, or
burnt away, and resolved again into dead matter. It is true
that we have much more complicated apparatus for performing
these functions, but it does not follow that these give us much
real superiority, except relatively to the more difficult condi-
tions of our existence. The gourmand who enjoys his dinner
may have no more pleasure in the act than the Amoeba which
swallows a Diatom ; and for all that the man knows of the
subsequent processes to which the food is subjected, his in-
terior might be a mass of jelly, with extemporised vacuoles,
WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON 1 53
like that of his humble fellow-animal. The clay is after all
the same, and there may be as much difficulty in the making
of a simple organism with varied powers, as a more complex
frame for doing higher work.
In order that we may feel, a complicated apparatus of
nerves and brain cells has to be constructed and set to work ;
but the Protozoon, without any distinct brain, is all brain, and
its sensation is simply direct. Thus vision in these creatures
is probably performed in a rough way by any part of their
transparent bodies, and taste and smell are no doubt in the
same case. Whether they have any perception of sound as
distinct from the mere -vibrations ascertained by touch, we do
not know. Here, also, we are not far removed above the Pro-
tozoa, especially those of us to whom touch, seeing and hear-
ing are direct acts, without any thought or knowledge of the
apparatus employed. We might, so far, as well be Amoebas.
As we rise higher we meet with more differences. Yet it is
evident that our gelatinous fellow being can feel pain, dread
danger, desire possessions, enjoy pleasure, and in a direct un-
conscious way entertain many of the appetites and passions
that affect ourselves. The wonder is that with so little of
organization it can do so much. Yet, perhaps, life can mani-
fest itself in a broader and more intense way where there is
little organization, and a highly strung and complex organism
is not so much a necessary condition of a higher life as a mere
means of better adapting it to its present surroundings.
A similar lesson is taught by the complexity of their
skeletons. We speak in a crude, unscientific way of these
animals accumulating calcareous matter, and building up
reefs of limestone. We must, however, bear in mind that they
are as dependent on their food for the materials of their
skeletons as we are, and that their crusts grow in the interior
of the sarcode just as our bones do within our bodies. The
provision even for nourishing the interior of the skeleton by
154 WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOOX
tubuli and canals is in principle similar to that involved in the
canals, cells, and canalicules of bone. The Amoeba, of course,
knows neither more nor less of this than the average English-
man. It is altogether a matter of unconscious growth. The
process in the Protozoa strikes some minds, however, as the
more wonderful of the two. It is, says an eminent modern
physiologist, a matter of " profound significance " that this
"particle of jelly [the sarcode of a Foraminifer] is capable of
guiding physical forces in such a manner as to give rise to
these exquisite and almost mathematically arranged structures."
Respecting the structures themselves there is no exaggeration
in this. No arch or dome framed by human skill is more
perfect in beauty or in the realization of mechanical ideas than
the tests of some Foraminifera, and none is so complete and
wonderful in its internal structure. The particle of jelly, how-
ever, is a figur J of speech. The body of the humblest Foram-
inifer is much more than this. It is an organism with divers
parts, and it is endowed with the mysterious forces of life which
in it guide the physical forces, just as they do in building up
phosphate of lime in our bones, or indeed, just as the will of
the architect does in building a palace. The profound signi-
ficance which this has, reaches beyond the domain of the
physical and vital, even to the spiritual. It clings to all our
conceptions of living things : "quite as much, for example, to
the evolution of an animal with all its parts from a one-celled
germ, as to the connection of brain cells with the manifesta-
tions of intelligence." Viewed in this way, we may share with
the author of the sentence I have quoted his feeling of venera-
tion in the presence of this great wonder of animal life, " burn-
ing, and not consumed," nay, building up, and that in many
and beautiful forms. We may realize it most of all in the
presence of the organism which was perhaps the first to mani-
fest on our planet these marvellous powers. We must, how-
ever, here also, beware of that credulity which makes too many
WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON 1 55
thinkers limit their conceptions altogether to physical force in
matters of this kind. The merely materialistic physiologist is
really in no better position than the savage who quails before
the thunderstorm, or rejoices in the solar warmth, and seeing
no force or power beyond, fancies himself in the immediate
presence of his God. In Eozoon we must discern not only a
mass of jelly but a being endowed with that higher vital force
which surpasses vegetable life, and also physical and chemical
forces ; and in this animal energy we must see an emanation
from a Will higher than our own, ruling vitality itself ; and
this not merely to the end of constructing the skeleton of a
Protozoon, but of elaborating all the wonderful developments
of life that were to follow in succeeding ages, and with re-
ference to which the production and growth of this creature
were initial steps. It is this mystery of design which really
constitutes the " profound significance " of the foraminiferal
skeleton.
Another phenomenon of animality forced upon our notice
by the Protozoa is that of the conditions of life in animals not
individual, as we are, but aggregative and cumulative in in-
definite masses. What, for instance, the relations to each
other of the Polyps, growing together in a coral mass, or the
separate parts of a Sponge, or the separate lobes of a Foram-
inifer. In the case of the Polyps we may believe that there
is special sensation in the tentacles and oral opening of each
individual, and that each may experience hunger when in
want, or satisfaction when it is filled with food, and that in-
juries to one part of the mass may indirectly affect other parts,
but that the nutrition of the whole mass may be as much
unfelt by the individual Polyps as the processes going on in
our own liver are by us. So in the case of a large Sponge, or
Foraminifer, there may be some special sensation in individual
cells, pseudopods, or segments, and the general sensation may
be very limited, while unconscious living powers pervade the
156 WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON
whole. In this matter of aggregation of animals we have thus
various grades. The Foraminifers and Sponges present us
with the simplest of all, and that which most resembles the
aggregation of buds in the plant. The Polyps and complex
Bryozoons present a higher and more specialized type ; and
though the bilateral symmetry which obtains in the higher
animals is of a different nature, it still at least reminds us of
that multiplication of similar parts which we see in the lower
grades of being. It is worthy of notice here that the lower
animals which show aggregative tendencies present but im-
perfect indications, or none at all, of bilateral symmetry.
Their bodies, like those of plants, are for the most part built
up around a central axis, or they show tendencies to spiral
modes of growth.
It is this composite sort of life which is connected with the
main geological function of the Foraminifer. While active
sensation, appetite, and enjoyment pervade the pseudopods
and external sarcode of the mass, the hard skeleton common
to the whole is growing within ; and in this way the calcareous
matter is gradually removed from the sea water, and built up
in solid reefs, or in piles of loose foraminiferal shells. Thus
it is the aggregative or common life, alike in Foraminifers as
in Corals, that tends most powerfully to the accumulation of
calcareous matter ; and those creatures whose life is of this
complex character are best suited to be world builders, since
the result of their growth is not merely a cemetery of their
osseous remains, but a huge communistic edifice, to which
multitudes of lives have contributed, and in which successive
generations take up their abode on the remains of their an-
cestors. This process, so potent in the progress of the earth's
geological history, began, as far as we know, with Eozoon.
Whether, then, in questioning our proto-foraminifer, we have
reference to the vital functions of its gelatinous sarcode, to the
complexity and beauty of its calcareous test, or to its capacity
WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON 1 57
for effecting great material results through the union of in-
dividuals, we perceive that we have to do, not with a low
condition of those powers which we designate life, but with
their manifestation through the means of a simple organism ;
and this in a degree of perfection which we, from our point of
view, would have in the first instance supposed impossible.
If we imagine a world altogether destitute of life, we still
might have geological formations in progress. Not only would
volcanoes belch forth their liquid lavas and their stones and
ashes, but the waves and currents of the ocean and the rains
and streams on the land, with the ceaseless decomposing action
of the carbonic acid of the atmosphere, would be piling up
mud, sand, and pebbles in the sea. There might even be
some formation of limestone taking place where springs charged
with bicarbonate of lime were oozing out on the land or the
bottom of the waters. But in such a world all the carbon
would be in the state of carbon dioxide, and all the limestone
would either be diffused in small quantities through various
rocks or in limited local beds, or in solution, perhaps as
chloride of calcium, in the sea. Dr. Hunt has given chemical
grounds for supposing that the most ancient seas were largely
supplied with this very soluble salt, instead of the chloride of
sodium, or common salt, which now prevails in the sea water.
Where in such a world would life be introduced ? on the
land or in the waters ? All scientific probability would say
in the latter.^ The ocean is now vastly more populous than
the land. The waters alone afford the conditions necessary
at once for the most minute and the grandest organisms, at
once for the simplest and for others of the most complex
character. Especially do they afford the best conditions for
* A recent writer (Simrolh) lias, however, unilertaken to iiiaintain the
thesis that land life preceded that in the sea. It is unnecessary to say that
he is an evolutionist, influenced by the necessity laid upon tliat pliilosopliy
to deduce whales, seals, etc., from land animals.
158 WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON
those animals which subsist in complex communities, and
which aggregate large quantities of mineral matter in their
skeletons. So true is this that up to the present time all the
species of Protozoa and of the animals most nearly allied to
them are aquatic. Even in the waters, however, plant life,
though possibly in very simple forms, must precede the
animal.
Let humble plants, then, be introduced in the waters, and
they would at once begin to use the solar light for the jiurpose
of decomposing carbonic acid, and forming carbon compounds
which had not before existed, and which, independently of
vegetable life, would never have existed. At the same time
lime and other mineral substances present in the sea water
would be fixed in the tissues of these plants, either in a minute
state of division, as little grains or Coccoliths, or in more solid
masses like those of the Corallines and Nullii)ores. In this
way a beginning of limestone formation might be made, and
quantities of carbonaceous and bituminous matter, resulting
from the decay of vegetable substances might accumulate on
the sea bottom. Now arises the opportunity for animal life.
The plants have collected stores of organic matter, and their
minute germs, along with microscopic species, are floating
everywhere in the sea. The plant has fulfilled its function as
far as the waters are concerned, and now a place is prepared
for the animal. In what form shall it ajipear? Many of its
higher forms, those which depend upon animal food or on the
more complex plants for subsistence, would obviously be un-
suitable. Further, the sea water is still too much saturated
with saline matter to be fit for the higher animals of the waters.
Still further, there may be a residue of internal heat forbidding
coolness, and that solution of free oxygen which is an essential
condition of existence to the higher forms of life. Something
must be found suitable for this saline, imperfectly oxygenated,
tepid sea. Something, too, is wanted that can aid in introduc-
WHAT MAY BE LEAl^NED FROM EOZOON 1 59
ing conditions more favourable to higher Hfe in the future.
Our experience of the modern world shows us that all these
conditions can be better fulfilled by the Protozoa than by any
other creatures. They can live now equally in those great
depths of ocean where the conditions are most unfavourable
to other forms of life, and in tepid unhealthy pools overstocked
with vegetable matter in a state of putridity. They form a
most suitable basis for higher forms of life. They have re-
markable powers of removing mineral matters from the waters
and of fixing them in solid forms. So, in the fitness of things,
a gigantic Foraminifer is just what we need, and after it has
spread itself over the mud and rock of the primeval seas, and
built up extensive reefs therein, other animals may be intro-
duced, capable of feeding on it, or of sheltering themselves in
its stony masses, and thus we have the appropriate dawn of
animal life.
But what are we to say of the cause of this new series of
facts, so wonderfully superimposed upon the merely vegetable
and mineral? Must it remain to us as an act of creation, or
was it derived from some pre-existing matter in which it had
been potentially present ? Science fails to inform us, but con-
jectural " phylogeny " steps in and takes its place. Haeckel,
the prophet of this new philosophy, waves his magic wand,
and simple masses of sarcode spring from inorganic matter,
and form diffused sheets of sea slime, from which are in time
separated distinct amoeboid and foraminiferal forms. Ex-
perience, however, gives us no facts whereon to build this
supposition, and it remains neither more nor less scientific or
certain than that old fancy of the Egyptians, which derived
animals from the fertile mud of the Nile.
If we fail to learn anything of the origin of Eozoon, and if
its life processes are just as inscrutable as those of higher
creatures, we can at least enquire as to its history in geolo-
logical time. In this respect we find, in the first place, that
l60 WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON
the Protozoa have not had a monopoly in their profession of
accumulators of calcareous rock.
Originated by Eozoon in the old Laurentian time, this pro-
cess has been proceeding throughout the geological ages ; and
while Protozoa, equally simple with the great prototype of the
race, have been and are continuing its function, and producing
new limestones in every geological period, and so adding to
the volume of the successive formations, new workers of higher
grades have been introduced, capable of enjoying higher forms
of animal activity, and equally of labouring at the great task
of continent building; of existing, too, in seas less rich in
mineral substances than those of the Eozoic time, and for that
very reason better suited to higher and more skilled artists. It
is to be observed in connection with this, that as the work of
the Foraminifers has thus been assumed by others, their size
and importance have diminished, and the larger forms of
more recent times have some of them been fain to build up
their hard parts of cemented sand instead of limestone.
^^'hen the marvellous results of recent deep-sea dredgings
were first made known, and it was found that chalky foram-
iniferal earth is yet accumulating in the Atlantic, with sponges
and sea urchins, resembling in many respects those whose
remains exist in the chalk, the fact was expressed by the state-
ment that we still live in the chalk period. Thus stated the
conclusion is scarcely correct. We do not live in the chalk
period, but the conditions of the chalk period still exist in the
deeper portions of the sea. We may say more than this. To
some extent the conditions of the Laurentian period still exist
in the sea, except in so far as they have been removed by the
action of the Foraminifcra and other limestone builders. To
those who can realize the enormous lapse of time involved in
the geological history of the earth, this conveys an impression
almost of eternity in the existence of this oldest of all the
families of the animal kingdom.
WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON l6l
We are still more deeply impressed with this when we bring
into view the great physical changes which have occurred since
the dawn of life. When we consider that the skeletons of
Eozoon contribute to form the oldest hills of our continents ;
that they have been sealed up in solid marble, and that they
are associated with hard crystalline rocks contorted in the
most fantastic manner ; that these rocks have almost from the
beginning of geological time been undergoing waste to supply
the material of new formations ; that they have witnessed in-
numerable subsidences and elevations of the continents ; and
that the greatest mountain chains of the earth have been built
up from the sea since Eozoon began to exist, — we acquire a
most profound impression of the persistence of the lower forms
of animal life, and know that mountains may be removed, and
continents swept away and replaced, before the least of the
humble gelatinous Protozoa can finally perish. Life may be
a fleeting thing in the individual, but as handed down through
successive generations of beings, and as a constant animating
power in successive organisms, it appears, like its Creator,
eternal.
This leads to another and very serious question. How long
did lineal descendants of Eozoon exist, and do they still exist ?
We may for the present consider this question apart from ideas
of derivation and elevation into higher planes of existence.
Eozoon as a species, and even as a genus, may cease to exist
with the Eozoic age, and we have no evidence whatever that
any succeeding creatures are its modified descendants. As far
as their structures inform us, they may as much claim to be
original creations as Eozoon itself. Still descendants of Eozoon
may have continued to exist, though we have not yet met with
them. I should not be surprised to hear of a veritable speci-
men being some day dredged alive in the Atlantic or the
Pacific. It is also to be observed that in animals so simple as
this many varieties may appear, widely different from the
l62 WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON
original. In these the general form and habit of life are the
most likely things to change, the minute structures much less
so. We need not, therefore, be surprised to find its descend-
ants diminishing in size or altering in general form, while the
characters of the fine tubulation and of the canal system would
remain. We need not wonder if any sessile Foraminifer of the
Nummuline group should prove to be a descendant of Eozoon.
It would be less likely that a Sponge or a Foraminifer of the
Rotaline type should originate from it. If one could only
secure a succession of deep-sea limestones with Foraminifers
extending all the way from the Laurentian to the present time,
I can imagine nothing more interesting than to compare the
whole series, with the view of ascertaining the limits of descent
with variation, and the points where new forms are introduced.
We have not yet such a series, but it may be obtained ; and as
these creatures are eminently cosmopolitan, occurring over
vastly wide areas of sea bottom, and are very variable, they
would afford a better test of theories of derivation than any
that can be obtained from the more locally distributed and
less variable animals of higher grade. I was much struck with
this recently, in examining a series of Foraminifera from
the Cretaceous of Manitoba, and comparing them with the
varietal forms of the same species in the interior of Nebraska,
500 miles to the south, and with those of the English chalk and
of the modern seas. In all these different times and places wo
had the same species. In all they existed under so many
varietal forms passing into each other, that in former times
every species had been multiplied by naturalists into several.
Yet, in all, the identical varietal forms were repeated with the
most minute markings the same. Here were at once constancy
the most remarkable, and variations the most extensive. If we
dwell on the one to the exclusion of the other, we reach only
one-sided conclusions, imperfect and unsatisfactory. By taking
both into connection we can alone reali/.c the full significance
WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM E02OON 163
of the facts. We cannot yet obtain such series for all geological
time ; but it may even now be worth while to enquire, What do
we know as to any modification in the case of the primeval
Foraminifers, whether with reference to the derivation from
them of other Protozoa or of higher forms of life ?
There is no link in geological fact to connect Eozoon with
any of the Mollusks, Radiates, or Crustaceans of the succeed-
ing Cambrian. What may be discovered in the future we can-
not conjecture ; but at present these stand before us as distinct
creations. It would of course be more probable that Eozoon
should be the ancestor of some of the Foraminifera of the
Primordial age, but strangely enough it is very dissimilar from
all these, except Cryptozoum and some forms of Stromatopora;
and here, as already stated, the evidence of minute structure
fails to a great extent. Of actual facts, therefore, we have
none ; and those evolutionists who have regarded the dawn
animal as an evidence in their favour have been obliged to have
recourse to supposition and assumption.
We may imagine Eozoon itself, however, to state its experi-
ence as follows : — " I, Eozoon Canadense, being a creature of
low organization and intelligence, and of practical turn, am no
theorist, but have a lively appreciation of such facts as I am
able to perceive. I found myself growing upon the sea bottom,
and know not whence I came. I grew and flourished for ages,
and found no let or hindrance to my expansion, and abundance
of food was always floated to me without my having to go in
search of it. At length a change came. Certain creatures
with hard snouts and jaws began to prey on me. \V'^hence
they came I know not ; I cannot think that they came from
the germs which I had dispersed so abundantly throughout the
ocean. Unfortunately, just at the same time lime became a
little less abundant in the waters, perhaps because of the great
demands I myself had made, and thus it was not so easy as
before to produce a thick supplemental skeleton for defence.
l64 WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON
So I had to give way. I have done my best to avoid extinc-
tion ; but it is clear that I must at length be overcome, and
must either disappear or subside into a humbler condition, and
that other creatures better provided for the new conditions of
the world must take my place." In such terms we may suppose
that this patriarch of the seas might tell his history, and mourn
his destiny, though he might also congratulate himself on hav-
ing in an honest way done his duty and fulfilled his function in
the world, leaving it to other and perhaps wiser creatures to
dispute as to his origin and fate, while perhaps much less
perfectly fulfilling the ends of their own existence.
Thus our dawn animal has positively no story to tell as to
its own introduction or its transmutation into other forms of
existence. It leaves the mystery of creation where it was, but
in connection with the subsequent history of life we can learn
from it a little as to the laws which have governed the succes-
sion of animals in geological time. First, we may learn that
the plan of creation has been progressive, that there has been
an advance from the few low and generalized types of the
primeval ocean to the more numerous, higher, and more
specialized types of more recent times. Secondly, we learn that
the lower types, when first introduced, and before they were
subordinated to higher forms of life, existed in some of their
grandest modifications as to form and complexity, and that
in succeeding ages, when higher types were replacing them,
they were subjected to decay and degeneracy. Thirdly, we
learn that while the species has a limited term of existence in
geological time, any large type of animal existence, like that of
the Foraminifera or Sponges, for example, once introduced,
continues and finds throughout all the vicissitudes of the earth
some appropriate residence. Fourthly, as to the mode of in-
troduction of new types, or whether such creatures as Eozoon
had any direct connection with the subsequent introduction
of MoUusks, Worms, or Crustaceans, it is altogether silent, nor
WHAT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON 1 65
can it predict anything as to the order or manner of their
introduction.
Had we been permitted to visit the Laurentian seas, and to
study Eozoon and its contemporary Protozoa when aHve, it is
plain that we could not have foreseen or predicted from the
consideration of such organisms the future development of life.
No amount of study of the prototypal Foraminifer could have
led us distinctly to the conception of even a Sponge or a Polyp,
much less of any of the higher animals. Why is this ? The
answer is that the improvement into such higher types does not
take place by any change of the elementary sarcode, either in
those chemical, mechanical, or vital properties which we can
study, but in the adding to it of new structures. In the Sponge,
which is perhaps the nearest type of all, we have the movable
pulsating cilium and true animal cellular tissue, and along with
this the spicular or fibrous skeleton, these structures leading to
an entire change in the mode of life and subsistence. In the
higher types of animals it is the same. Even in the highest we
have white blood corpuscles and germinal matter, which, in so
far as we know, carry on no higher forms of life than those of an
Amoeba ; but they are now made subordinate to other kinds of
tissues, of great variety and complexity, which never have been
observed to arise out of the growth of any Protozoon. There
would be only a few conceivable inferences which the highest
finite intelligence could deduce as to the development of future
and higher animals. He might infer that the Foraminiferal
sarcode, once introduced, might be the substratum or founda-
tion of other but unknown tissues in the higher animals, and
that the Protozoon type might continue to subsist side by side
with higher forms of living things, as they were successively
introduced. He might also infer that the elevation of the
animal kingdom would take place with reference to those new
properties of sensation and voluntary motion in which the
humblest animals diverge from the Hfe of the plant,
s. E. 12
l66 WAHT MAY BE LEARNED FROM EOZOON
It is important that these points should be clearly before our
minds, because there has been current of late among natural-
ists a loose way of writing with reference to them, which seems
to have imposed on many who are not naturalists. It has been
said, for example, that such an organism as Eozoon may include
potentially all the structures and functions of the higher
animals, and that it is possible that we might be able to infer
or calculate all these with as much certainty as we can calcu-
late an eclipse or any other physical phenomenon. Now, there
is not only no foundation in fact for these assertions, but it is,
from our present standpoint, not conceivable that they can ever
be realized. The laws of inorganic matter give no data whence
any a priori deductions or calculations could be made as to
the structure and vital forces of the plant. The plant gives no
data from which we can calculate the functions of the animal.
The Protozoon gives no data from which we can calculate the
specialties of the Mollusk, the Articulate, or the Vertebrate.
Nor, unhappily, do the present conditions of life of themselves
give us any sure grounds for predicting the new creations that
may be in store for our old planet. Those who think to build
a philosophy and even a religion on such data are mere
dreamers, and have no scientific basis for their dogmas. They
are as blind guides as our primaeval Protozoon himself would
be in matters whose real solution lies in the harmony of our
own higher and immaterial nature with the Being who is the
Author of all life — the Father " from whom every family in
heaven and earth is named."'
Rf.fekences :—" Life's Dawn on Eailli." London, 18S5. Specimens
of Eozoon in the Peter Redpath Museum, Montreal, 1888.
THE APPARITION AND SUCCESS/ON OF ANIMAL
FORMS.
DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF
THE EMINENT SWISS AND AMERICAN ZOOLOGIST
LOUIS AGASSIZ,
The Founder of the Modern School of American Biolcgv,
AND OF
SIR RICHARD OWEN,
A Great and Phh.osophical Naturalist,
TO whose Teaching I and very many Others owe our earliest
introduction to the Principle of Homology
IN THE Animal Kingdom.
Modern Ideas of Derivation — Development of Animal
Forms in Time — Various Theories of Derivation —
History of Organic Types — History of Organs —
Testimony of the Geological Record — Laws of the
Succession — Development and Evolution — Evolu-
tionist Theologians
Old forms of Triloeites, from tlie Lower Cambrian (p. 173 el saj.
Oleiielliis Thompsoui, Emmons.
Apiostus vir, Matthew.
Parndoxides regiua, Matthew.
CHAPTER VII.
THE APPARITION AND SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL
FORMS.
TIME was when naturalists were content to take nature as
they found it, without any over-curious inquiries as to
the origin of its several parts, or the changes of which they
might be susceptible. Geology first removed this pleasant
state of repose, by showing that all our present species had
a beginning, and were preceded by others, and these again
by others. Geologists were, however, too much occupied with
the facts of the succession to speculate on the ultimate causes
of the appearance and disappearance of species, and it re-
mained for zoologists and botanists, or as some prefer to call
themselves, biologists, to construct hypotheses or theories to
account for the ascertained fact that successive dynasties of
species have succeeded each other in time. I do not propose
in this paper so much to deal with the various doctrines as to
derivation and development now current, as to ask the ques-
tion. What do we actually know as to the origin and history of
life on our planet ?
This great question, confessedly accompanied with many
difficulties and still waiting for its full solution, has points of
intense interest both for the Geologist and the Biologist.
" If," says the great founder of the uniformitarian School of
Geology, " the past duration of the earth be finite, then the
aggregate of geological epochs, however numerous, must con-
stitute a mere moment of the past, a mere infinitesimal portion
of eternity." Yet to our limited vision, the origin of life fades
170 THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS
away in the almost illimitable depths of past time, and we are
ready to despair of ever reaching, by any process of discovery,
to its first steps of progress. At what time did life begin ? In
what form did dead matter first assume or receive those
mysterious functions of growth, reproduction and sensation ?
Only when we picture to ourselves an absolutely lifeless world,
destitute of any germ of life or organization, can we realize
the magnitude of these questions, and perceive how necessary
it is to limit their scope if we would hope for any satisfactory
answer.
We may here dismiss altogether that form in which these
questions present themselves to the biologist, when he experi-
ments as to the evolution of living forms from dead liquids or
solids attacking the unsolved problem of spontaneous genera-
tion. Nor need we enter on the vast field of discussion as to
modern animals and plants opened up by Darwin and others.
I shall confine myself altogether to that historical or palreonto-
logical aspect in which life presents itself when we study the
fossil remains entombed in the sediments of the earth's crust,
and which will enable me at least to show why some students
of fossils hesitate to give in their adhesion to any of the cur-
rent notions as to the origin of species. It will also be desir-
able to avoid, as far as possible, the use of the term "evolution,''
as this has recently been employed in so many senses, whether
of development or causation, as to have become nearly useless
for any scientific purpose ; and that when I speak of creation
of species, the term is to be understood not in the arbitrary
sense forced on it by some modern writers, but as indicating
the continuous introduction of new forms of life under definite
laws, but by a power not emanating from within themsehes,
nor from the inanimate nature surrounding them.^
' The terms Derivalion, Development and Causatit)n have elear and
definite meanings, and it is preferable, wherever possible, to use one or other
of these.
THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS I7I
If we were to follow the guidance of those curious analogies
which present themselves when we consider the growth of the
individual plant or animal from the spore or the ovum, and the
development of vegetable and animal life in geological time —
analogies which, however, it must be borne in mind can have
no scientific value whatever, inasmuch as that similarity of
conditions which alone can give force to reasoning from an-
alogy in matters of science, is wholly wanting — we should ex-
pect to find in the oldest rocks embryonic forms alone, but of
course embryonic forms suited to exist and reproduce them-
selves independently.^
I need not say to palaeontologists that this is not what we
actually find in the primordial rocks. I need but to remind
them of the early and remarkable development of such forms
as the Trilobites, the Lingulidce and the Pteropods, all of them
highly complex and specialized types, and remote from the
embryonic stages of the groups to which they severally belong.
In the case of the Trilobites, one need merely consider the
beautiful symmetry of their parts, both transversely and longi-
tudinally, their division into distinct regions, the necessary com-
plexity of their muscular and nervous systems, their highly
complex visual organs, the superficial ornamentation and micro-
scopic structure of their crusts, their advanced position among
Crustaceans, indicated by their strong affinity with the Arach-
nidans or spiders and .scorpions. (See figures prefixed.)
^ I may be pardoned for taking an example of the confusion of thought
which this mode of reasoning has introduced into Biology from a clever
article in the Contemporary written by a very able and much-esteemed
biologist. He says : " The morphological distance between a newly hatched
frog's tadpole and tiie adult fiog is almost as great as that between the
adult lancelet and the newly hatched larva; of the lamprey." The "mor-
phological distance" truly, but what of the physiological distance between
the young and adult of the same animal and two adult animals between
which is placed the great gulf of specific and generic diversity which w ith-
in human experience neither has been known to pass ?
172 THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS
All these characters give them an aspect far from embryonic,
while, as Barrande has pointed out, this advanced position of
the group has its significance greatly strengthened by the fact
that in early primordial times we have to deal not with one
species, but with a vast and highly differentiated group, embrac-
ing forms of many and varied subordinate types. As we shall
see, these and other early animals may be regarded as of
generalized types, but not as embryonic. Here, then, meets us
at the outset the fact that in as far as the great groups of annu-
lose and molluscous animals are concerned, we can trace these
back no farther than to a period in which they appear already
highly advanced, much specialized and represented by many
diverse forms. Either, therefore, these great groups came in on
this high initial plane, or we have scarcely reached half way
back in the life-history of our planet.
We have, here, however, by this one consideration, attained
at once to two great and dominant laws regulating the his-
tory of life. First, the law of continuity, whereby new forms
come in successively, throughout geological time, though,
as we shall see, with periods of greater or less frequency.
Secondly, the law of specialization of types, whereby general-
ized forms are succeeded by those more special, and this pro-
bably connected with the growing specialization of the inorganic
world. It is this second law which causes the paralleHsm
between the history of successive species and that of the
embryo.
We have already considered the claims which Eozoon and
its contemporaries may urge to recognition, as beginnings of
life ; but when we ascend from the Laurentian beds, we find
ourselves in a barren series of conglomerates, sandstones, and
other rocks, indicating shore rather than sea conditions, and
remarkably destitute of indications of life. These are the
Huronian beds, and possibly other series associated with them.
They have afforded spicules of sponges, casts of burrows of
THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS 1/3
worms, obscure forms, which may represent crustaceans or
molhisks, markings of unknown origin, and some laminated
forms which may perhaps represent remains of Eozoon, though
their structures are imperfectly preserved. These are sufficient
to show that marine life continued in some forms, and to en-
courage the hope that a rich pre-Cambrian fauna may yet be
discovered.
But let us leave for the present the somewhat isolated case
of Eozoon, and the few scattered forms of the Huronian, and
go on farther to the early Cambrian fauna. This is graphi-
cally presented to us in the sections in South Wales, as de-
scribed by Hicks. Here we find a nucleus of ancient rocks,
supposed to be T.aurentian, though in mineral character more
nearly akin to the Huronian, but which have hitherto afforded
no trace of fossils. Resting unconformably on these is a
series of slates and sandstones, regarded as Lower Cambrian,
the Caerfai group of Hicks, and which are the earliest holding
organic remains. The lowest bed which contains indications
of life is a red shale near the base of the series, which holds a
few organic remains. The species are a Linguklla, worm bur-
rows and a Trilobite.^ Supposing these to be all, it is remark-
able that we have no Protozoa or Corals or Echinoderms, and
that the types of Brachiopods and Crustaceans are of compara-
tively modern affinities. Passing upward through i,ooo feet
of barren sandstone and shale, we reach a zone in which
many Trilobites of at least five genera are found, along with
Pteropods, Brachiopods and Sponges. Thus it is that life
comes in at the base of the Cambrian in ^^'ales, and it may be
regarded as a fair specimen of the facts as they appear in the
earlier fossiliferous beds succeeding the Laurentian. Taking
the first of these groups of fossils, we may recognise in the
worms representatives of those that still haunt our shores, in
the Trilobite a Crustacean or Arachnoid of no mean grade.
' Probably of the genus Olenelliis.
174 THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS
The Linguiella;, whether we regard them as moUuscoids, or,
with Professor Morse, as singularly specialized worms, represent
a peculiar and distinct type, handed down, through all the
vicissitudes of the geological ages, to the present da)'. Had
the Primordial life begun with species altogether inscrutable
and unexampled in succeeding ages, this would no doubt have
been mysterious ; but next to this is the mystery of the oldest
forms of life being also among the newest. One great fact
shines here with the clearness of noon-day. Whatever the
origin of these creatures, they represent families which have
endured till now in the struggle for existence without either
elevation or degradation. Here, again, we may formulate an-
other creative law. In every great group there are some forms
much more capable of long continuance than others. Lingula
among the Brachiopods is a marked instance.
But when, with Hicks, we surmount the mass of barren beds
underlying these remains, which from its unfossiliferous charac-
ter is probably a somewhat rapid deposit of Arctic mud, like
that which in all geological time has constituted the rough fill-
ing of our continental formation.s, and have suddenly sprung
upon us many genera of Trilobites, including the fewest-jointed
and most many-jointed, the smallest and the largest of their
race, our astonishment must increase, till we recognise the fact
that we are now in the presence of another great law of creation,
which provides that every new type shall be rapidly extended
to the extreme limits of its power of adaptation.
That this is not merely local is evidenced by the researches
of Matthew and Walcott in the oldest Cambrian of America,
where a similar succession occurs, but with this difference, that
in the wider area presented by the American continent we find
a greater variety of forms of life. Walcott records up to 1893
no less than 67 genera and 165 species in the oldest Cambrian
of America. These include representatives of the Sponges,
Hydroids, Corals, Echinoderms, Worms, Brachiopods, Bivalve
THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS 1 75
and Univalve MoUusks and Crustaceans, or in other words, all
the leading groups of invertebrate animals that we find in the
sea at present. Of these the dominant group is the Crustaceans,
including Trilobites, numbering one-third of the whole ; and
these with the univalve MoUusks and the Brachiopods constitute
the majority, the other groups having comparatively few species.
What a marvellous incoming of life is here ! Walcott may
well say that on the theory of gradual development we must
suppose that life existed at a period far before the Cambrian —
as far, indeed, as the Cambrian is before our own time. But
this would mean that we know only half of the history of life ;
and perhaps it is more reasonable to suppose that when the
conditions became favourable, it came in with a rush.
Before considering the other laws that may be inferred from
these facts, however, let us in imagination transfer ourselves
back to the Primordial age, and suppose that we have in our
hands a living specimen of one of the larger Trilobites, recently
taken from the sea, flapping vigorously its great tail, and full of
life and energy ; an animal larger and heavier than the modern
king-crab of our shores, furnished with all the complexity of
external parts for which the crustaceans are so remarkable, and
no doubt with instincts and feelings and modes of action as pro-
nounced as those of its modern allies, and, if Woodward's views
are correct, on a higher plane of rank than the king-crab itself,
inasmuch as it is a composite type connecting Limuli with
Isopods, and even with scorpions. We have obviously here,
in the appearance of this great Crustacean or Arachnoid, a repe-
tition of the facts which we met with in Eozoon ; but how vast
the interval between them in geological time, and in zoological
rank ! Standing in the presence of this testimony, I think it
is only right to say that we possess no causal solution of the
appearance of these early forms of life ; but in tracing them
and their successors upward through the succeeding ages, we
may hope at least to reach some expressions of the laws of
1/6 THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS
their succession, in possession of which we may return to
attack the mystery of their origin.
First, it must strike every observer that there is a great same-
ness of plan throughout the whole history of marine inverte-
brate life. If we turn over the pages of an illustrated textbook
of geology, or examine the cases or drawers of a collection of
fossils, we shall find extending through every succeeding for-
mation, representative forms of Crustaceans, Mollusks, Corals,
etc., in such a manner as to indicate that in each successive
period there has been a reproduction of the same type with
modifications ; and if the series is not continuous, this appears
to be due rather to abrupt physical changes ; since sometimes,
where two formations pass into each other, we find a gradual
change in the fossils by the dropping out and introduction of
species one by one. Thus, in the whole of the great Palaeozoic
Period, both in its Fauna and Flora, we have a continuity and
similarity of a most marked character.
It is evident that there is presented to us in this similarity
of the forms of successive faunas and floras, a phenomenon
which deserves very careful sifting as to the question of identity
or diversity of species. The data for its comprehension must
be obtained by careful study of the series of closely allied
forms occurring in successive formations, and the great and
undisturbed areas of the older rocks in America seem to give
special facilities for this, which should be worked, not in the
direction of constituting new species for every slightly diver-
gent form, but in striving to group these forms into large
specific types. ^
There is nothing to preclude the supposition that some of
the groups mentioned in the note are really specific types, with
^ The Rynchonella; of Ihe type of R. plena, the Oi tbids, of the type of
O. testiuiinaria, the Strophouienie of the types of 6". (7//tV7/aAi ancKS". Rhom-
boidalis, the Atrypne of tlie type of -•/. rdicuhiiis, furnish cases in point
among the Brachiopods.
THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS 1 7/
numerous race modifications. My own provisional conclusion,
based on the study of Palaeozoic plants, is that the general law
will be found to be the existence of distinct specific types, in-
dependent of each other, but liable in geological time to a
great many modifications, which have often been regarded as
distinct species.^
While this unity of successive faunae at first sight presents
an appearance of hereditary succession, it loses much of this
character when we consider the number of new types introduced
without apparent predecessors, the necessity that there should
be similarity of type in successive faunae on any hypothesis of
a continuous plan ; and above all, the fact that the recurrence
of representative species or races in large proportion marks
times of decadence rather than of expansion in the types to
which they belong. To turn to another period, this is very
manifest in that singular resemblance which obtains between
the modern mammals of South America and Australia, and
their immediate fossil predecessors — the phenomenon being
here manifestly that of decadence of large and abundant
species into a few depauperated representatives. This will be
found to be a very general law, elevation being accompanied
by the apparent abrupt appearance of new types and decadence
by the apparent continuation of old species, or modifications
of them.
This resemblance with difference in successive faunas also
connects itself very directly with the successive elevations and
depressions of our continental plateaus in geological time.
Every great Palaeozoic limestone, for example, indicates a
depression with succeeding elevation. On each elevation
marine animals were driven back into the ocean, and on each
depression swarmed in over the land, reinforced by new
species, either then introduced, or derived by migration from
other localities. In like manner, on every depression, land
' "Geological History of Plants."
178 THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS
plants and animals were driven in upon insular areas, and on
re-elevation, again spread themselves widely. Now I think it
will be found to be a law here that periods of expansion were
eminently those of introduction of new specific types, and
periods of contraction those of extinction, and also of continu-
ance of old types under new varietal forms.
It must also be noticed that all the leading types of in-
vertebrate life were early introduced, that change within these
was necessarily limited, and that elevation could take place
mainly by the introduction of the vertebrate orders. So in
plants. Cryptogams early attained their maximum as well as
GymnospermSj and elevation occurred in the introduction of
Phsenogams, and this not piecemeal, but as we shall see in
a succeeding chapter, in great force at once.
We may further remark the simultaneous appearance of like
types of life in one and the same geological period, over widely
separated regions of the earth's surface. This strikes us es-
pecially in the comparatively simple and homogeneous life-
dynasties of the Palaeozoic, when, for example, we find the same
types of Silurian Graptolites, Trilobites and Brachiopods ap-
pearing simultaneously in Australia, America and Europe.
Perhaps in no department is it more impressive than in the
introduction of the Devonian and Carboniferous Ages of that
grand cryptogamous and gymnospermous flora which ranges
from Brazil to Spitzbergen, and from Australia to Scotland,
accompanied in all by^the same groups of marine invertebrates.
Such facts may depend either on that long life of specific
types which gives them ample time to spread to all possible
habitats, before their extinction, or on some general law where-
by the conditions suitable to similar types of life emerge at one
time in all parts of the world. Both causes may be influential,
as the one does not exclude the other, and there is reason to
believe that both are natural facts. Should it be ultimately
proved that species allied and representative, but distinct in
THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS 179
origin, come into being simultaneously everywhere, we shall
arrive at one of the laws of creation, and one probably con-
nected with the gradual change of the physical conditions of
the world.
Another general truth, obvious from the facts which have
been already collected, is the periodicity of introduction of
species. They come in by bursts or flood tides at particular
points of time, while these great life waves are followed and
preceded by times of ebb in which little that is new is being
produced. We labour in our investigation of this matter
under the disadvantage that the modern period is evidently
one of the times of pause in the creative work. Had our time
been that of the early Tertiary or early Mesozoic, our views as
to the question of origin of species might have been very dif-
ferent. It is a striking fact, in illustration of this, that since
the glacial age no new species of mammal, except, possibly, man
himself, can be proved to have originated on our continents,
while a great number of large and conspicuous forms have
disappeared. It is possible that the proximate or secondary
causes of the ebb and flow of life production may be in part at
least physical, but other and more important efficient causes
may be behind these. In any case these undulations in the
history of life are in harmony with much that we see in other
departments of nature.
It results from the above and the immediately preceding
statement, that specific and generic types enter on the stage in
great force, and gradually taper off towards extinction. They
should so appear in the geological diagrams made to illustrate
the succession of living beings. This applies even to those
forms of life which come in with fewest species and under the
most humble guise. What a remarkable swarming, for ex-
ample, there must have been of Marsupial Mammals in the
early Mesozoic, and in the Coal formation the only known
Pulmonate snails, five or six in number, belong to four generic
S. E. 13
l8o THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS
types, while the Myriapods and Amphibians ahke appear in a
crowd of generic forms.
I have already referred to the permanence of species in
geological time. We may now place this in connection with
the law of rapid origination and more or less continuous
transmission of varietal forms. A good illustration will be
afforded by a group of species with which I am very familiar,
that which came into our seas at the beginning of the Glacial
age, and still exists. With regard to their permanence, it can
be affirmed that the shells now elevated in Wales to 1,200,
and in Canada to 600 feet above the sea, and which lived be-
fore the last great revolution of our continents — a period very
remote as compared with human history — differ in no tittle
from their modern successors after hundreds or thousands of
generations. It can also be afifirmed that the more variable
species appear under precisely the same varietal forms then as
now, though these varieties have changed much in their local
distribution. The real import of these statements, which might
also be made with regard to other groups, well known to pale-
ontologists, is of so great significance that it can be realized
only after we have thought of the vast time and numerous
changes through which these humble creatures have survived.
I may call in evidence here a familiar New England animal,
the common sand clam, Jlfva arenaria, and its relative Mya
fniiicaia, the short sand clam, which now inhabit together all
the northern seas ; for the Pacific specimens, from Japan and
California, though differently named, are undoubtedly the same.
Alva tritncata appears in Europe in the Coralline Crag, and
was followed by M. arenaria in the Jvcd Crag. Both shells
occur in the Pleistocene of America, and their several varietal
forms had already developed themselves in the Crag, and re-
main the same to-day ; so that these humble mollusks, littoral
in their habits, and subjected to a great variety of conditions,
have continued for a very long period to construct their shells
THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS l8l
precisely as at present ; while in many places, as on the Lower
St. Lawrence, we find them living together on the same banks,
and yet preserving their distinctness. ^ Nor are there any in-
dications of a transition between the two species. I might
make similar statements with regard to the Astartes, Bucci-
nums and Tellinje of the drift, and could illustrate them by
extensive series of specimens from my own collections.
Another curious illustration is that presented by the Tertiary
and modern faunce of some oceanic islands far separated from
the continents. In ALadeira and Porto Santo, for example,
according to Lyell, we have fifty-six species of land shells in
the former, and forty-two in the latter, only twelve being com-
mon to the two, though these islands are only thirty miles
apart. Now in the Pliocene strata of Madeira and Porto
Santo we find thirty-six species in the former, and thirty-five in
the latter, of which only eight per cent, are extinct, and yet
only eight are common to the two islands. Further, there
seem to be no transitional forms connecting the species, and
of some of them the same varieties existed in the Pliocene as
now. The main difference in time is the extinction of some
species and the introduction of others without known connect-
ing links, and the fact that some species, plentiful in the
Pliocene, are rare now, and vice versa. All these shells differ
from those of modern Europe, but some of them are allied to
Miocene species of that continent. Here we have a case of
continued existence of the same forms, and in circumstances
which, the more we think of them, the more do they defy all
our existing theories as to specific origins.
Perhaps some of the most remarkable facts in connection
with the permanence of varietal forms of species are those
furnished by that magnificent flora which burst in all its
majesty on the American continent in the Cretaceous period,
and still survives among us, even in some of its specific types.
' Paper in Record of Science, on Shells at Little Metis.
1 82 THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS
I say survives ; for we have but a remnant of its forms living,
and comparatively little that is new has probably been added
since. The confusion which has obtained as to the age of
this flora, and its mistaken reference to the Miocene Tertiary,
have arisen in part from the fact that this modern flora was in
its earlier times contemporary with Cretaceous animals, and
survived the gradual change from the animal life of the Creta-
ceous down to that of the Eocene, and even of the Miocene.
In collections of these plants, from what may be termed beds
of transition from the Cretaceous to the Tertiary, we find many
plants of modern species, or so closely related that they may be
mere varietal forms. Some of these v. ill be mentioned in the
next paper, and they show that modern plants, some of them
small and insignificant, others of gigantic size, reach back to a
time when the Mesozoic Dinosaurs were becoming extinct, and
the earliest Placental mammals being introduced. Shall we
say that these plants have propagated themselves unchanged
for half a million of years, or more ? '
Take from the western Mesozoic a contrasting yet illustrative
fact. In the lowest Cretaceous rocks of Queen Charlotte's
Island, Mr. Richardson and Dr. G. M. Dawson find Ammon-
ites and allied Cephalopods similar in many respects to those
discovered farther south by the California Survey, and Mr.
Whiteaves finds that some of them are apparently not distinct
from species described by the Palteontologists of the Geological
Survey of British India. On both sides of the Pacific these
shells lie entombed in solid rock, and the Pacific rolls between,
as of yore. Yet these species, genera, and even families are
all extinct — why, no man can tell, while land plants that must
have come in while the survivors of these Cephalopods still
lived, reach down to the present. How mysterious is all this,
^ Among these are living species of ferns, one of tliem our common
" Sensitive Fern," of Eastern America, two species of Hazel still extant,
and Sequoias or giant pines, like those now surviving in California.
THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS 1 83
and how strongly does it show the independence in some sense
of merely physical agencies on the part of the manifestations
of life !
We have naturally been occupied hitherto with the lower
tribes of animals and with plant life, because these are pre-
dominant in the early ages of the earth. Let us turn now to
the history of vertebrate or back-boned animals, which presents
some peculiarities special to itself. Many years ago Pander ^
described and figured from the Cambro-silurian of Russia, a
number of minute teeth, some conical and some comb-like,
which he referred to fishes, and to that low form of the fish
type represented by the modern lampreys. Much doubt was
thrown on this determination, more especially as the teeth
seemed to be composed not of bone earth, but of carbonate of
lime, and it was suggested that they may have belonged to
marine worms, or to the lingual ribbons of Gastropod mol-
lusks. Some confirmatory evidence seems to have been sup-
plied by the discovery of great numbers of similar forms in the
shales of the coal formation of Ohio, by the late Dr. Newberry.
I have had an ojiportunity to examine these, and find that they
consist of calcium phosphate,- or bone earth, and that their
microscopic structure is not dissimilar from that of the teeth
of some of the smaller sharks (Uiplodus) found with them. I
have therefore been inclined to believe that there may have
already been, even in the Cambrian or Lower Silurian seas,
true fishes, related partly to the lampreys and partly to sharks ;
so that the history of the back-boned animals may have gone
nearly as far back as that of their humbler relations. This
conjecture has recently received further support from the
discovery in rocks of Lower Silurian age, in Colorada of a
veritable bone bed, rich in fragmentary remains of fishes.
' More recently Rohan has described conical teeth (St. Petersburg
Academy, 18S9), but I have not seen his paper.
- Analysis of Dr. B. J. Harrington.
184 THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS
They are unfortunately so comminuted as to resemble the
debris of the food of some larger animal ; but in so far as I can
judge from specimens kindly given to me/ they resemble the
bony coverings of some of the familiar fishes of the Devonian.
Thus they would indicate, with Pander's and Rohan's speci-
mens, already two distinct types of fishes as existing almost as
early as the higher invertebrates of the sea.
In the Silurian (Upper Silurian of Murchison) we have un-
doubted evidence of the same kind, on both sides of the
Atlantic, in teeth and spines of sharks, and the plates which
protected the heads and bodies of the plate-covered fishes
(Placo-ganoids). But it is in the Devonian that these types
appear to culminate, and we have added to them that remark-
able type of " lung fish," as the Germans call them, represented
in our modern world only by the curious and exceptional
Burramunda of Australia, and the mud fishes of Africa and
South America,^ creatures which show, as do some of the
mailed fishes, or ganoids, of equally great age, the intermediate
stages between a swimming bladder and a lung, and thus ap-
proach nearer to the air-breathing animals than any other fishes.
Many years ago, in "Acadian Geology," I referred to the
probability that the mailed and lung fishes of the Devonian and
Carboniferous possessed airb ladders so constructed as to
enable them to breathe air, as is the case with their modern
representatives. In the modern species this, no doubt, enables
them to haunt badly aerated waters, in swamps and sluggish
streams, and in some cases even to survive when the water
in which they live is dried up. In the Carboniferous and
Devonian it may have served a similar purpose, litting them
to inhabit the lagoons and creeks of the coal swamps, the
water of which must often have been badly aerated. It makes
against this that some sharks followed them into these waters,
1 By Mr. F. D. Adams ami Dr. Walcott.
- Ceratodus, Lipidosiren, Protopterus.
'"'^'^^^OfloaaBOO^^^
Two Primitive VERTEiiRATFS, PalaosponJylns (enlarged) and
PtirkhtJnis (reduced),
(After Woodward, with some modifications.)
THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS 1 85
and the modern sharks have no swim-bladders. Possibly,
however, the sharks habitually haunted the open sea, and
only made occasional raids on the dangerous waters tenanted
by the ganoids. It is also true that only certain genera of
sharks are found to be represented in the carbonaceous shales,
and they may have differed in this respect from the ordinary
forms of the order. It has been suggested that only a small
change would be necessary to enable some of these lung fishes
to become Batrachians, and no doubt this is the nearest
approach of the fish to the reptile ; but we have not yet found
connecting links sufficient to bridge over the whole distance.
The plate-bearing ganoids of the Silurian and Devonian, at
one time supposed to be allied to Crustaceans, but whose
dignity as " Forerunners of the back-boned animals "' is now
generally admitted,^ are clearly true fishes, and of somewhat
high rank, their strange bony armour being evidently a special
protection against the attacks of contemporary sharks and
gigantic crustaceans ; and if we may judge by the Colorado
specimens, their existence dates back almost to the close of the
Cambrian, and they were probably contemporary with small
sharks ; while as early as the Silurian and Devonian, if we
regard the scaly ganoids as a distinct type, we have already
four types of fishes, and these akin to those which in modern
time Ave must regard as the highest of their class.
One very little fish of the Devonian, of which specimens
have been kindly sent me by a friend in Scotland,^ the Pala^o-
' A. Smith Woodward, " Natuial Science," 1892, and Annals and
Alaga. Nat. Hist,, October, 1S90. This able naturaHst, in introducing
his subject, remarks, from the point of view of an evolutionist : —
"Whether some form of 'v/orm' gave origin to the forerunners of the
great back-boned race, or whether a primeval relative of the King-crab
turned upside down and rearranged limbs and head — these are questions
still admitting of endless discussion, no doubt fruitless in their main object,
liut desirable from the new lines of investigation they continually suggest."
- James Reed, Esq., of Allan House, Blairgowrie.
1 86 THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS
spondylus of Traquair, may raise still higher hopes for the early
vertebrates. It is a little creature, an inch to two inches in
length, destitute or nearly destitute of bony covering, having a
head which suggests the presence of external gills, large eyes,
and even elongated nasal bones,^ a long vertebral column
composed of separate bony rings, more than fifty in number,
with possible indications of ribs in front and distinct neural
and haemal processes behind. One cannot look at it with-
out the suggestion occurring of some of the smaller snake-
like Batrachians of the Carboniferous and Permian ; and I
should not be surprised if it should come to be regarded
either as a forerunner of the Batrachians or as a primitive
tadpole.
However this may be, the upper part of the Devonian, though
rich in fishes and plants, has afforded no higher vertebrates
than its lower parts, and in the lowest Carboniferous beds we
suddenly find ourselves in the presence of Batrachians with
well-developed limbs and characters which ally them to the
Lizards. True lizard-like reptiles appear in the Permian, and
then we enter on that marvellous reign of reptiles, in which
this class assumed so many great and remarkable forms, and
asserted itself in a manner of which the now degraded reptilian
class can afford no conception.
The mammals and birds make their first appearance quietly
in small and humble forms in the reign of reptiles, in which
there was little place left for them by the latter ; but the
mammals burst upon us in all their number and magnitude in
the Eocene and Miocene, jn which quadrupedal mammalian
life may be said to have culminated in grandeur, variety, and
geographical distribution ; far excelling in these respects the
time in which we live.
The development in time of the back-boned animals thus
stands in some degree by itself; but it illustrates the same
' I .im aware that Woodward regards these parts differently.
THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS 1 8/
laws of early generalised types, and sudden and wide introduc-
tion of new forms, which we have seen in the case of the in-
vertebrates and the plants.
Such facts as those to which I have referred, and many
others, which want of space prevents me from noticing, are in
one respect eminently unsatisfactory, for they show us how
difficult must be any attempts to explain the origin and succes-
sion of life. For this reason they are quietly put aside or
explained away in most of the current hypotheses on the sub-
ject. But we must, as men of science, face these difficulties,
and be content to search for facts and laws, even if they should
prove fatal to preconceived views.
A group of new laws, indeed, here breaks upon us. (i)
The great vitality and rapid extension and variation of new
specific types. (2) The law of spontaneous decay and mor-
tality of species in time. (3) The law of periodicity and of
simultaneous appearance of many allied forms. (4) The
abrupt entrance and slow decay of groups of species. (5) The
extremely long duration of some species in time. (6) The
grand march of new forms landwards, and upwards in rank.
Such general truths deeply impress us at least with the conclu-
sion that we are tracing, not a fortuitous succession, but the
action of power working by law.
I have thus far said nothing of the bearing of the prevalent
ideas of descent with modification on this wonderful pro-
cession of life. None of these, of course, can be expected to
take us back to the origin of living beings ; but they also fail
to explain why so vast numbers of highly organized species
struggle into existence simultaneously in one age and disappear
in another, why no continuous chain of succession in time can
be found gradually blending species into each other, and why,
in the natural succession of things, degradation under the
influence of external conditions and final extinction seem to be
laws of organic existence. It is useless here to appeal to the
1 88 THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS
imperfection of tlie record, or to tine movements or migrations
of species. Tlie record is now, in many important parts, too
complete, and the simultaneousness of the entrance of the
faunas and floras too certainly established, and moving species
from place to place only evades the difficulty. The truth is
that such hypotheses are at present premature, and that we
require to have larger collections of fiicts. Independently of
this, however, it appears to me that from a philosophical i)oint
of view it is extremely probable that all theories of evolution, as
at present applied to life, are fundamentally defective in being
too partial in their character; and perhaps I cannot better group
the remainder of the facts to which I wish to refer than by
using them to illustrate this feature of most of our attempts at
generalization on this subject.
First, then, these hypotheses are too partial, in their tendency
to refer numerous and complex phenomena to one cause, or to
a few causes only, when all trustworthy analogy would indicate
that they must result from many concurrent forces and deter-
minations of force. We have all, no doubt, read those ingenious,
not to say amusing, speculations in which some entomologists
and botanists have indulged with reference to the mutual
relations of flowers and suctorial insects. Geologically the
facts oblige us to begin with Cryptogamous plants and chewing
insects, and out of the desire of insects for non-existent honey,
and the adaptations of plants to the requirements of non-
existent suctorial apparatus, we have to evolve the marvellous
complexity of floral form and colouring, and the exquisitely
delicate apparatus of the mouths of haustellate insects. Now.
when it is borne in mind that this theory implies a mental con-
fusion on our part precisely similar to that which, in the depart-
ment of mechanics, actuates the seekers for perpetual motion,
that we have not the smallest tittle of evidence that the changes
required have actually occurred in any one case, and that the
thousands of other structures and relations of the plant and the
THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS 1 89
insect have to be worked out by a series of concurrent develop-
ments so complex and absolutely incalculable in the aggregate,
that the cycles and epicycles of the Ptolemaic astronomy were
child's play in comparison, we need not wonder that the com-
mon sense of mankind revolts against such fancies, and that we
are accused of attempting to construct the universe by methods
that would baffle Omnipotence itself, because they are simply
absurd. In this aspect of them, indeed, such speculations are
necessarily futile, because no mind can grasp all the com-
plexities of even any one case, and it is useless to follow out an
imaginary line of development which unexplained facts must
contradict at every step. This is also, no doubt, the reason
why all recent attempts at constructing " Phylogenies " are so
changeable, and why no two experts can agree about almost
any of them.
A second aspect in which such speculations are too partial,
is in the unwarranted use which they make of analogy. It is
not unusual to find such analogies as that between the em-
bryonic development of the individual animal and the succes-
sion of animals in geological time placed on a level with that
reasoning from analogy by which geologists apply modern
causes to explain geological formations. No claim could be
more unfounded. When the geologist studies ancient lime-
stones built up of the remains of corals, and then applies the
phenomena of modern coral reefs to explain their origin, he
brings the latter to bear on the former by an analogy which in-
cludes not merely the apparent results, but the causes at work,
and the conditions of their action, and it is on this that the
validity of his comparison depends, in so far as it relates to
similarity of mode of formation. But when we compare the
development of an animal from an embryo cell with the pro-
gress of animals in time, though we have a curious analogy as
to the steps of the process, the conditions and causes at work
are known to be altogether dissimilar, and therefore we have no
190 THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS
evidence whatever as to identity of cause, and our reasoning
becomes at once the most transparent of fallacies. P'urther, we
have no right here to overlook the fact that the conditions of
the embryo are determined by those of a previous adult, and
that no sooner does this hereditary potentiality produce a new
adult animal, than the terrible external agencies of the physical
world, in presence of which all life exists, begin to tell on the
organism, and after a struggle of longer or shorter duration it
succumbs to death, and its substance returns into inorganic
nature, a law from which even the longer life of the species
does not seem to exempt it. All this is so plain and manifest
that it is extraordinary that evolutionists will continue to use
such partial and imperfect arguments. Another illustration
may be taken from that application of the doctrine of natural
selection to explain the introduction of species in geological
time, which is so elaborately discussed by Sir C. Lyell in the
last edition of his " Principles of Geology." The great geolo-
gist evidently leans strongly to the theory, and claims for it the
" highest degree of probability," yet he perceives that there is
a serious gap in it ; since no modern fact has ever proved the
origin of a new species by modification. Such a gap, if it
existed in those grand analogies by which he explained geo-
logical formations through modern causes, would be admitted
to be fatal.
A third illustration of the partial character of these hypo-
theses may be taken from the use made of the theory deduced
from modern physical discoveries, that life must be merely a
product of the continuous operation of physical laws. The
assumption — for it is nothing more — that the phenomena of life-
are produced merely by some arrangement of physical forces,
even if it be admitted to be true, gives only a partial explana-
tion of the possible origin of life. It docs not account for the
fact that life, as a force, or combination of forces, is set in
antagonism to all other forces. It does not account for the
THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS IQI
marvellous connection of life with organization. It does not
account for the determination and arrangement of forces
implied in life. A very simple illustration may make this
plain. If the problem to be solved were the origin of the
mariner's compass, one might assert that it is wholly a physical
arrangement, both as to matter and force. Another might
assert that it involves mind and intelligence in addition. In
some sense both would be right. The properties of magnetic
force and of iron or steel are purely physical, and it might even
be within the bounds of possibility that somewhere in the
universe a mass of natural loadstone may have been so balanced
as to swing in harmony with the earth's magnetism. Yet we
would surely be regarded as very credulous if we could be in-
duced to believe that the mariner's compass has originated in
that way. This argument applies with a thousandfold greater
force to the origin of life, which involves even in its simplest
forms so many more adjustments of force and so much more
complex machinery.
Fourthly, these hypotheses are partial, inasmuch as they fail
to account for the vastly varied and correlated interdepen-
dencies of natural things and forces, and for the unity of plan
which pervades the whole. These can be explained only by
taking into the account another element from without. Even
when it professes to admit the existence of a God, the evolu-
tionist reasoning of our day contents itself altogether with the
physical or visible universe, and leaves entirely out of sight the
power of the unseen and spiritual, as if this were something
with which science has nothing to do, but which belongs only
to imagination or sentiment. So much has this been the case,
that when recently a few physicists and naturalists have referred
to the " Unseen Universe," they have seemed to be teaching
new and startling truths, though only reviving some of the
oldest and most permanent ideas of our race. From the dawn
of human thought it has been the conclusion alike of philoso-
192 THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS
phers, theologians, and the common sense of mankind, that the
seen can be explained only by reference to the unseen, and
that any merely physical theory of the world is necessarily
partial. This, too, is the position of our sacred Scriptures, and
is broadly stated in their opening verse, and indeed it lies alike
at the basis of all true religion and all sound philosophy, for it
must necessarily be that "the things that are seen are temporal,
the things that are unseen, eternal." With reference to the
primal aggregation of energy in the visible universe, with refer-
ence to the introduction of life, with reference to the soul of
man, with reference to the heavenly gifts of genius and pro-
phecy, with reference to the introduction of the Saviour Himself
into the world, and with reference to the spiritual gifts and
graces of God's people, all these spring, not from sporadic acts
of intervention, but from the continuous action of God and the
unseen world ; and this, we must never forget, is the true ideal
of creation in Scripture and in sound theology. Only in such
exceptional and little influential philosophies as that of Demo-
critus, and in the speculations of a few men carried off their
balance by the brilliant physical discoveries of our age, has
this necessarily partial and imperfect view been adopted. Never,
indeed, was its imperfection more clear than in the light of
modern science.
Geology, by tracing back all present things to their origin,
was the first science to establish on a basis of observed facts
the necessity of a beginning and end of the world. But even
physical science now teaches us that the visible universe is a
vast machine for the dissipation of energy; that the processes
going on in it must have had a beginning in time, and that all
things tend to a final and helpless equilibrium. This necessity
implies an unseen power, an invisible universe, in which the
visible universe must have originated, and to which its energy
is ever returning. The hiatus between the seen and the unseen
may be bridged over by the conceptions of atoiuic vortices of
THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS I93
force, and by the universal and continuous ether ; but whether
or not, it has become clear that the conception of the unseen,
as existing, has become necessary to our belief in the possible
existence of the pliysical universe itself, even without taking
life into account.
It is in the domain of life, hov^-ever, that this necessity be-
comes most apparent ; and it is in the plant that we first
clearly perceive a visible testimony to that unseen which is the
counterpart of the seen. Life in the plant opposes the out-
ward rush of force in our system, arrests a part of it on its
way, fixes it as potential energy, and thus, forming a mere eddy,
so to speak, in the process of dissipation of energy, it accumu-
lates that on which animal life and man himself may subsist,
and assert for a time supremacy over the seen and temporal on
behalf of the unseen and eternal. I say, for a time, because
life is, in the visible universe, as at present constituted, but a
temporary exception, introduced from that unseen world where
it is no longer the exception but the eternal rule. In a still
higher sense, then, than that in which matter and force testify
to a Creator, organization and life, whether in the plant, the
animal, or man, bear the same testimony, and exist as outposts
put forth in the succession of ages from that higher heaven
that surrounds the visible universe. In them, too, Almighty
power is no doubt conditioned or limited by law ; yet they bear
more distinctly upon them the impress of their Maker, and,
while all explanations of the physical universe which refuse to
recognise its spiritual and unseen origin must necessarily be
partial and in the end incomprehensible, this destiny falls more
quickly and surely on the attempt to account for life and its
succession on merely materialistic principles.
Here again, however, we must bear in mind that creation, as
maintained against such materialistic evolution, whether by
theology, philosophy, or Holy Scripture, is necessarily a con-
tinuous, nay, an eternal, influence, not an intervention of dis-
.s. E. 14
194 THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS
connected acts. It is the true continuity, which inckides and
binds together all other continuity.
It is here that natural science meets with theology, not as an
antagonist, but as a friend and ally in its time of greatest
need ; and I must here record my belief that neither men of
science nor theologians have a right to separate what God in
Holy Scripture has joined together, or to build up a wall
between nature and religion, and write upon it, " no thorough-
fare." The science that does this must be impotent to explain
nature, and without hold on the higher sentiments of man.
The theology that does this must sink into mere superstition.
In conclusion, can we formulate a few of the general laws,
or perhaps I had better call them the general conclusions,
respecting life, in which all Palaeontologists may agree. Per-
haps it is not possible to do this at present satisfactorily, but
the attempt may do no harm, ^^'e may, then, I think, make
the following afifirmations : —
1. The existence of life and organization on the earth is not
eternal, or even coeval with the beginning of the physical uni-
verse, but may possibly date from Laurentian or immediately
pre-Laurentian ages.
2. The introduction of new species of animals and plants has
been a continuous process, not necessarily in the sense of
derivation of one species from another, but in the higher sense
of the continued operation of the cause or causes which intro-
duced life at first. This, as already stated, I take to be the
true theological or Scriptural as well as scientific idea of what
we ordinarily and somewhat loosely term creation.
3. Though thus continuous, the process has not been uni-
form ; but periods of rapid production of species have alter-
nated with others in which many disappeared and few were
introduced. This may have been an effect of physical cycles
reacting on the progress of life.
4. Species, like individuals, have greater energy ami \ iuility in
THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS 1 95
their younger stages, and rapidly assume all their varietal forms,
and extend themselves as widely as external circumstances will
permit. Like individuals also, they have their periods of old
age and decay, though the life of some species has been of
enormous duration in comparison with that of others ; the
difference appearing to be connected with degrees of adaptation
to different conditions of life.
5. Many allied species, constituting groups of animals and
plants, have made their appearance at once in various parts of
the earth, and these groups have obeyed the same laws with
the individual and the species in culminating rapidly, and then
slowly diminishing, though a large group once introduced has
rarely disappeared altogether.
6. Groups of species, as genera and orders, do not usually
begin with their highest or lowest forms, but with intermediate
and generalized types, and they show a capacity for both eleva-
tion and degradation in their subsequent history.
7. The history of life presents a progress from the lower to
the higher, and from the simpler to the more complex, and
from the more generalized to the more specialized. In this
progress new types are introduced, and take the place of the
older ones, which sink to a relatively subordinate place, and
become thus degraded. But the physical and organic changes
have been so correlated and adjusted that life has not only
always maintained its existence, but has been enabled to
assume more complex forms, and thus older forms have been
made to prepare the way for newer, so that there has been, on
the whole, a steady elevation culminating in man himself.
Elevation and specialization have, however, been secured at the
expense of vital energy and range of adaptation, until the new
element of a rational and inventive nature was introduced only
in the case of man.
8. In regard to the larger and more distinct types, we
cannot find evidence that they have, in their introduction,
196 THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS
been preceded by similar forms connecting them with previous
groups ; but there is reason to beheve that many supposed
representative species in successive formations are really only
races or varieties.
9. In so far as we can trace their history, specific types are
permanent in their characters from their introduction to their
extinction, and their earlier varietal forms are similar to their
later ones.
10. Palaeontology furnishes no direct evidence, perhaps
never can furnish any, as to the actual transformation of one
species into another, or as to the actual circumstances of
creation of a species ; but the drift of its testimony is to show
that species come in per saltiim, rather than by any slow and
gradual process.
11. The origin and history of life cannot, any more than the
origin and determination of matter and force, be explained on
purely material grounds, but involve the consideration of power
referable to the unseen and spiritual world.
Different minds may state these principles in different ways,
but I believe that in so far as palaeontology is concerned, in
substance they must hold good, at least as steps to higher
truths. And now allow me to say that we should be thankful
that it is given to us to deal with so great questions, and
that in doing so, deep humiliation, earnest seeking for truth,
patient collection of all facts, self-denying abstinence from
hasty generalizations, forbearance and generous estimation with
regard to our fellow labourers, and reliance on that Divine
Spirit which has breathed into us our intelligent life, and is
the source of all true wisdom, arc the qualities which best be-
come us.
But while the principles noted above may be said to be
known laws of the apparition of new forms of life, they do
not reach to the secondary efficient causes of the introduction
of new species. "What these may ultimately prove to be, to
THE SUCCESSION OF ANIMAL FORMS IQ/
what extent they can be known by us, and to what extent they
may include processes of derivation, it is impossible now to
say. At present we must recognise in the prevailing theories
on the subject merely the natural tendency of the human mind
to grasp the whole mass of the unknown under some grand
general hypothesis, which, though perhaps little else than a
figure of speech, satisfies for the moment. We are dealing
with the origin of species precisely as the alchemists did with
chemistry, and as the Plutonists and Neptunists did with
geology ; but the hypotheses of to-day may be the parents of
investigations which will become real science to-morrow. In
the meantime it is safe to affirm that whatever amount of truth
there may be in the several hypotheses which have engaged
our attention, there is a creative force above and beyond them,
and to the threshold of which we shall inevitably be brought,
after all their capabilities have been exhausted by rigid in-
vestigation of facts. It is also consolatory to know that
species, in so far as the Modern period, or any one past geo-
logical period may be concerned, are so fixed that for all
practical purposes they may be regarded as unchanging. They
are to us what the planets in their orbits are to the astronomer,
and speculations as to the origin of species are merely our
nebular hypotheses as to the possible origin of worlds and
systems.
References : — Address as Vice-President of American Associalioii at
Detroit, 1875. " Tlie Chain of Life in Geological Time," London,
1879. Addresses to Natural History Society of Montreal, published
in Canadian A'atnralist, "Apparition of Animal Yovm^," PiincetoJi
/\e7'ici<.'.
THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS.
DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF
DR. OSWALD HEER,
The Able and Successful Student of the later Flokas
OF THE Northern Hemisphere.
Geologicai, Periods as Related to Plants — Arctic Orioix
OF Floras — The Devonl\n Fi ora — Arctic CLnL\TES
OF the Past — History of Some Modern Forms —
Laws of the Succession
Win W*
Vegetation of the Middle Devonian or Erian, restored from
actual specimens (p. 202).
CHAPTER VIII.
THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS.
IF, for convenience of reference, we divide the whole history
of the earth, from the time when a sohd crust first formed
on its surface and began to be ridged up into islands or moun-
tains in the primeval ocean, into four great periods, we shall
find that each can be characterized by some features in relation
to the world of plants.
That Archean age, in which the oldest known beds of rocks
were produced — rocks now greatly crumpled by the first move-
ments of the thin crust, and hardened and altered by heat and
pressure — has, it is true, little to tell us. But, as elsewhere
stated, even it has beds of Carbon in the form of Graphite —
veritable altered coal seams — which the analogy of later forma-
tions would lead us to believe must have been accumulated by
the growth of plants. This growth is indeed the only known
cause capable of producing such effects. If we should ever
be fortunate enough to find beds of the Laurentian series in
an unaltered state, we may hope to know something of this old
flora. Nor need we be surprised if it should prove of higher
grade and more noble development than we should at first sight
anticipate. If there ever was a time when vegetation alone
possessed the earth, and when there were no animals to devour
or destroy it, we might expect to find it in its first and best
estate, perhaps not comparable in variety and complexity of
parts with the flora of the modern world, but grand in its
luxuriance and majesty. Of such discoveries, however, we have
no certain indication at present.
202 THE GENESIS AND MIGRATION OF PLANTS
If such a primeval flora as that above indicated ever ex-
isted, it must have perished utterly before the incoming of the
next great age of the world — that known as the Palaeozoic,
whose rocks are surpassingly rich in the remains of animals,
especially those of the lower or invertebrate classes and those
that inhabit the waters.
In the oldest Palaeozoic rocks we find no plants certainly
terrestrial, but abundance of Algae or seaweeds, and some
gigantic members of the vegetable kingdom which seem to
have been trees, with structures more akin to those of aquatic
than to those of land plants.^ At a somewhat early stage, how-
ever, in the rocks of this period, we discover a few undoubted
land plants.^ These seem to be allied to the modern Club-
mosses and to their humble relations, the pilhvorts -^ and
other small plants of similar structure found in ponds and
swamps. Some of them, indeed, appear to be intermediate
between these groups. All these plants are Cryptogams, or
destitute of true flowers, but do not belong to the lowest forms
of that type. Thus, so far as we know, plant life on the land
began possibly with certain large trees of algoid structures, and
more certainly with the club mosses and pilhvorts and their
allies, and these last in the form of species not tree-like in
dimensions, but of very moderate size. The structures of
these plants are already sufficiently well known to inform us
that the plan and functions of the root, stem and leaf, and of
spores and spore case were set up ; and that the structures and
functions of vegetable cells, fibres and some kinds of vessels
were perfected, and all the apparatus introduced necessary for
the fertilization and reproduction of plants of some degree of
complexity. At the same time, the peculiar structures of the
higher Algae were brought to a pitch of perfection not surpassed
* Nematopliyloii, etc. Sec " Gcolpt;ical History of Plants. "'
- Psilophyton, rrotannularia, etc.
■* Rhizocarpeiv.
THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF TLANTS 203
if equalled in modern times, and which may have enabled
plants so constructed to exist even on the land.
From these beginnings in the early Palaeozoic, the progress
of the vegetable kingdom went on, until, in the later parts of
that great period, the Devonian and Carboniferous eras, it
culminated in those magnificent forests ^Yhich have left so
many interesting remains, and which accumulated the materials
of our great beds of coal. In these the famihes of the Club
mosses, the Ferns and the Mare's-tails attained to a perfection
in structure and size altogether unexampled in the modern
world, and may be said to have overspread the earth almost to
the exclusion of other trees. Here, however, two new families
come in of higher grade, and leading the way to the flowering
plants. These are the Pines and their allies and the Cycads,
and certain intermediate forms, neither Pines nor Cycads, but
allied to both.^ This wonderful flora, which we have now the
materials to reproduce in imagination almost in its entirety,
decays and passes away in the Permian system, the last portion
of the Palaeozoic, and in entering into the third great period of
the earth's history — the Mesozoic, we again find an almost
entire change of vegetation. Here, however, we are able to
understand something of the reasons of this. The Palceozoic
floras seem to have originated in the North, and propagated
themselves southward till they replenished the earth, and they
were favoured by the existence at that time of vast swampy
flats extending over great areas of the yet imperfectly elaborated
continents. The Mesozoic floras, on the other hand, seem to
have been of Southern or equatorial origin, and to have fol-
lowed up the older vegetation as it decayed and disappeared,
' Cordaitis, etc. As I have elsewliere shown, these are distinct sub-
floras in the Lower, Middle and Upper Devonian, and in the Lower,
Middle and Upper Carboniferous and Permian, sufficiently different to
allow these periods to be determined by the evidence of these fossil
plants. Reports prepared for Geological Survey of Canada.
204 THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS
or retreated in its old age to its northern home. There is, of
course, much in all this that we do not understand, but the
general fact seems certain.
The early Mesozoic is altogether peculiar. It shows a vast
predominance of Cycads, Pines and Ferns, to the exclusion
both of the gigantic Cryptogams of the Palaeozoic and of the
ordinary exogenous trees of the modern time. It has a strange,
weird aspect, and more resembles that of some warm i.slands
of the southern hemisphere at present, than anything else
known to us. It is as if the flora of some southern island had
migrated and invaded all parts of the world. The geographical
and climated conditions which permitted this must have been of
a character different from those both of earlier and later times.
As we approach to the termination of the Mesozoic, which,
in regard to animal life, is the age of reptiles, a new and
strange development meets us. We find beds filled with
leaves of broad-leaved plants similar to those of our modern
woods, and in most cases apparently belonging to the same
genera with plants now living, and this new type of vege-
tation persists to the present, though with marked differences
of species in successive eras, as in the Middle and Upper
Cretaceous, and the Lower, Middle and Upper Kainozoic, or
Tertiary. It is noteworthy that while this new vegetation not
only altogether supersedes the great Cryptogamous forests of
the Palaeozoic, but replaces the Cycads of the immediately
preceding eras, the Pines retain all their prominence and
grandeur, and even seem to excel in number of species, in
breadth of dispersion, and in magnitude of growth their
successors in the present world.
While in the latter Cretaceous and Early Tertiary, the
northern hemisphere at least seems to have enjoyed an ex-
ceptionally warm climate, the later Tertiary introduces that
period of cold known as the Glacial age. ^Vhile there is no
doubt that the intensity of this glaciation lias been greatly
THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS 205
exaggerated by extreme glacialists, and while it is certain that
some vegetation, and this not altogether of Arctic types, con-
tinued to exist throughout this period, even in the now tem-
perate regions of our continents, it is evident that a great
reduction of the exuberance of the flora occurred by the
removal of many species, and that the present flora of the
northern hemisphere is inferior in variety and magnificence
to that of the Middle Tertiary, just as it is found that the
Mammalian fauna of our continents has since that time been
reduced both in the number and magnitude of its species.
If the reader has followed this general sketch, he will be
prepared to appreciate some examples of a more detailed
character relating to the floras of different periods, and some
discussions of general points relating to the genesis and vicis-
situdes of the vegetable kingdom.
The origination of the more important floras which have
occupied the northern hemisphere in geological times, not,
as one might at first sight suppose, in the sunny climates of
the South, but under the arctic skies, is a fact long known or
suspected. It is proved by the occurrence of fossil plants in
Greenland, in Spitzbergen, and in Grinnell Land, under cir-
cumstances which show that these were their primal homes.
The fact bristles with physical difficulties, yet is fertile of the
most interesting theoretical deductions, to reach which we may
well be content to wade through some intricate questions.
Though not at all a new fact, its full significance seems only re-
cently to have dawned on the minds of geologists, and within
recent years it has produced a number of memoirs and ad-
dresses to learned societies, besides many less formal notices. 1
' Sapoiata, " Aiicienne Vegetation Tolaire " ; Hooker, Presidential
Address to Royal Society, 1878; Thistleton Dyer, "Lecture on Plant
Distribution " ; Mr. Starkic Gardner, Letters in Nature, 1S78, etc. Tlie
basis of most of the.>c brochures is to be found in I leer's " Flora Fossilis
Arctica."
2o6 THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS
The earliest suggestion on this subject known to the writer
is that of my old and dear friend, Professor Asa Gray, in 1867,
with reference to the probable northern source of the related
floras of North America and FLastern Asia. With the aid of
new facts disclosed by Heer and Lesquereux, Gray returned
to the subject in 1872, and more fully developed this conclu-
sion with reference to the Tertiary floras, '^ and still later he
further discussed these questions in an able lecture on " Forest
Geography and Archseology." ^ In this he puts the case so
well and tersely that I may quote the following sentences as a
text for what follows : —
" I can only say, at large, that the same species (of Tertiary
fossil plants) have been found all round the world ; that the
richest and most extensive finds are in Greenland ; that they
comprise most of the sorts w^hich I have spoken of, as Ameri-
can trees which once lived in Europe— Magnolias, Sassafras,
Hickories, Gum-trees, our identical Southern Cypress (for all
we can see of difference), and especially Sequoias, not only the
two which obviously answer to the two Big-trees now peculiar
to California, but several others ; that they equally comprise
trees now peculiar to Japan and China — three kinds of Gingko-
trees, for instance, one of them not evidently distinguishable
from the Japan species which alone survives : that we have
evidence, not merely of Pines and Maples, Poplars, Birches,
Lindens, and whatever else characterize the temperate-zone
forests of our era, but also of particular species of these, so
like those of our own time and country, that we may fairly
reckon them as the ancestors of several of ours. Long
genealogies always deal more or less in conjecture ; but we
appear to be within the limits of scientific inference when we
announce that our existing temperate trees came from the
north, and within the bounds of high probability when we
' Address to American Associ.ition.
* American Journal 0/ Science, y.\\, 1S7S.
THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS 20/
claim not a few of them as the originals of present species.
Remains of the same plants have been found fossil in our
temperate region, as well as in Europe."
Between i860 and 1870 the writer was engaged in working
out all that could be learned of the Devonian plants of
Eastern America, the oldest known flora of any richness, and
which consists almost exclusively of gigantic, and to us
grotesque, representatives of the Club mosses. Ferns, and
Mares'-tails, with some trees allied to the Cycads and Pines.
In this pursuit nearly all the more important localities were
visited, and access was had to the large collections of Professor
Hall and Professor Newberry in New York and Ohio, as well
as to those of the Geological Survey of Canada, and to those
made in the remarkable plant-bearing beds of St. John, New
Brunswick, by Messrs. Matthew and Hartt. In the progress
of these researches, which developed an unexpectedly rich
assemblage of species, the northern origin of this old flora
seemed to be established by its earlier culmination in the
north-east, in connection with the growth of the American
land to the southward, which took place after the great Upper
Silurian subsidence, by elevations which began in the north,
while those portions of the continent to the south-west still
remained under the sea.
When, in 1870, the labours of those ten years were brought
before the Royal Society of London, in the Bakerian Lecture
of that year, and in a memoir illustrating no less than one
hundred and twenty-five species of plants older than the great
Carboniferous system, these deductions were stated in con-
nection with the conclusions of Hall, Logan, and Dana, as to
the distributions of sediment along the north-east side of the
American continent, and the anticipation was hazarded that
the oldest Palaeozoic floras would be discovered to the north
of Newfoundland. Mention was also made of the apparent
earlier and more copious birth of the Devonian flora in
s. E, ic
2oS THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS
America than in Europe, a fact which is itself connected with
the greater northward extension of this continent.
Unfortunately the memoir containing these results was not
published by the Royal Society, and its publication was
secured in a less perfect form only in the reports of the Geo-
logical Survey of Canada. The part of the memoir relating
to Canadian fossil plants, with a portion of the theoretical de-
ductions, was published in a report issued in 1871.^ In this
report the following language was used : —
" In Eastern America, from the Carboniferous period on-
ward, the centre of plant distribution has been the Appalachian
chain. From this the plants and sediments extended west-
ward in times of elevation, and to this they receded in times
of depression. But this centre was non-existent before the
Devonian period, and the centre of this must have been to the
north-east, whence the great mass of older Appalachian sedi-
ment was derived. In the Carboniferous period there was
also an eastward distribution from the Appalachians, and
links of connection in the Atlantic bed between the floras of
Europe and America. In the Devonian such connection can
have been only far to the north-east. It is therefore in New-
foundland, Labrador, and Greenland that we are to look for
the oldest American flora, and in like manner on the border of
the old Scandinavian nucleus for that of Europe."'
"Again, it must have been the wide extension of the sea of
the Corniferous limestone that gave the last blow to the re-
maining flora of the Lower Devonian : and the re-elevation in
the middle of that epoch brought in the Appalachian ridges as
a new centre, and established a connection with Europe which
introduced the Upper Devonian and Carboniferous floras.
Lastly, from the comparative richness of the later Erian '' flora
1 " Fossil Plants of the Devonian and Upper .Silurian Formations of
Canada," pp. 92, twenty plates. Montreal, 1S71.
* The term Erian is used as synonymous with Devonian, and prob-
THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS 209
in Eastern America, especially in the St. John beds, it might
be a fair inference that the north-astern end of the Appala-
chian ridge was the original birthplace or centre of creation of
what we may call the later Palaeozoic flora, or a large part of
that flora."
When my paper was written I had not seen the account
published by the able Swiss paloeobotanist Heer, of the re-
markable Devonian flora of Bear Island, near Spitzbergen.^
From want of acquaintance with the older floras of America
and Western Europe, Heer fell into the unfortunate error of
regarding the Bear Island plants as Lower Carboniferous, a
mistake which his great authority has tended to perpetuate,
and which has even led to the still graver error of some Euro-
pean geologists, who do not hesitate to regard as Carboni-
ferous the fossil plants of the American deposits from the
Hamilton to the Chemung groups inclusive, though these be-
long to formations underlying the oldest Carboniferous, and
characterized by animal remains of unquestioned Devonian
age. In 1872 I addressed a note to the Geological Society of
London on the subject of the so-called " Ursa stage " of Heer,
showing that though it contained some forms not known at so
early a date in temperate Europe, it was clearly Devonian when
tested by North American standards ; but that in this high
latitude, in which, for reasons stated in the report above re-
ferred to, I believed the ]3evonian plants to have originated,
there might be an intermixture of the two floras. But such a
mixed group should in that latitude be referred to a lower
horizon than if found in temperate regions.
Between 1870 and 1873 my attention was turned to the two
subfloras intermediate between those of the Devonian and the
ably should be preferred to it, as poinling to the best development of
this formation known, which is on the shores of Lake Erie.
' Trans. Swedish Academy, 187 1, Journal London Geological Sociely,
vol. xxviii.
2IO THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS
coal formation, the floras of the Lower Carboniferous (Sub-
carboniferous of some American geologists) and the Millstone
Grit, and in a report upon these ^ similar deductions were ex-
pressed. It was stated that in Newfoundland and Northern
Cape Breton the coal formation species come in at an early
part of that period, and as we proceed southward they belong
to progressively newer portions of the Carboniferous system.
'J'he same fact is observed in the coal beds of Scotland, as
compared with those of England, and it indicates that the
coal formation flora, like that of the Devonian, spread itself
from the north, and this accords with the somewhat extensive
occurrence of Lower Carboniferous rocks and fossils in the
Parry Islands and elsewhere in the Arctic regions. ^
Passing over the comparatively poor flora of the earlier
Mesozoic, consisting largely of cycads, pines, and ferns, which,
as we have seen, is probably of southern origin, and is as yet
little known in the arctic, though represented, according to
Heer, by the supposed Jurassic flora of Cape Boheman, we
find, especially at Kome' and Atane in Greenland, an interest-
ing occurrence of those earliest precursors of the truly modern
forms of plants which appear in the Cretaceous, the period of
the English chalk, and of the New Jersey greensands. There
are two plant groups of this age in Greenland, one, that of
Kome consists almost entirely of ferns, cycad.s, and pines, and is
of decidedly Mesozoic aspect. This was regarded by Heer as
Lower Cretaceous. The other, that of Atane, holds remains
of many modern temperate genera, as Fopuhis, JMyrica, Ficus,
Sassafras, and AIai:;nolia. This he regards as IMiddle Creta-
ceous. Above this is the Patoot series, with many exogenous
trees of modern genera, and representing the Upper Creta-
ceous. Resting u[)on these Upper Cretaceous beds, without
* " Fossil Plants of Lower Carboniferous and Millstone Grit Formations
of Canada," pp. 47, 10 plates. Montreal, 1S73.
* G. M. Dawson, " Report on Arctic Regions of Canada."
THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS 211
the intervention of any other formation/ are beds rich in
plants of much more modern appearance, and referred by
Heer to the Miocene period, a reference which appeared at
the time to be warranted by comparison with the Tertiary
plants of Europe, but, as we shall see, not with those of
America. Still farther north this so-called Miocene assemblage
of plants appears in Spitzbergen and Grinnell Land ; but
there, owing to the predominance of trees allied to the spruces,
it has a decidedly more boreal character than in Greenland, as
might be anticipated from its nearer approach to the pole.^
If now we turn to the Cretaceous and Tertiary floras of
Western America, as described by Lesquereux, Newberry, and
Ward, we find in the lowest Cretaceous rocks known there
until very recently — those of the Dakota group, which may
be in the lower part of the Middle Cretaceous — a series of
plants •'' essentially similar to those of the Middle Cretaceous
of Greenland. To these I have been able to add, through the
researches of Mr. Richardson and Dr. G. M. Dawson, a still
earlier flora, that of the Kootanie and Queen Charlotte Island
formations, as old as the Gault and Wealden. It wants the
broad-leaved plants of the Dakota, and consists mainly of
pines, cycads, and ferns ; and only in its upper part contains
a few forerunners of the exogens.'* These plants occur in beds
indicating shallow sea conditions as prevalent in the interior
of America, causing, no doubt, a warm climate in the north.
Overlying this plant-bearing formation we have an oceanic
limestone (the Niobrara), corresponding in many respects to
* Nordenskiold, Expedition to Greenland, Geological Alagazijit', 1872.
^ Yet even here the Bald Cypress {Taxodiitni distichiiin), or a tree nearly
allied to it, is found, though this species is now limited to the Southern
States. Fielden and Dc Y^-xwzq, Journal of Geological Society, 1878.
^ Lesquereux, Rejiort on Cretaceous Flora. The reader not interested
in American details may pass over to the middle of page 213.
■* This flora has since been described in Virginia and Maryland by
l'"()ntaine, and has been recognised in Montana by Newberry.
212 THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS
the European chalk, and containing similar microscopic organ-
isms. This extends far north into the British territory,^ indi-
cating farther subsidence and the prevalence of a vast Mediter-
ranean Sea, filled with warm water from the equatorial cur-
rents, and not invaded by cold waters from the north. This
is succeeded by Upper Cretaceous deposits of clay and sand-
stone, with marine remains, though very sparsely distributed ;
and these show that further subsidence or denudation in the
north had opened a way for the arctic currents, producing a
fall of temperature at the close of the Cretaceous, and partially
filling up the Mediterranean of that period.
Of the flora of the Middle and Upper Cretaceous periods,
which must have been very long, we know something in the
interior regions through the plants of Dunvegan and Peace
River ; ^ and on the coast of British Columbia we have the
remarkable Cretaceous coalfield of Vancouver's Island, which
holds the remains of plants of modern genera, including species
of fan palm, ginkgo, evergreen oak, tulip tree, and other forms
proper to a warm temperature or subtropical climate. They
probably indicate a warmer climate as then prevalent on the
Pacific coast than in the interior, and in this respect corre-
spond with a meagre transition flora, intermediate between the
Cretaceous and Eocene or earliest Tertiary of the interior re-
gions, and named by Lesquereux the Lower Lignitic.
Immediately above these Upper Cretaceous beds we have
the great Lignite Tertiary of the west — the T-aramie group or
recent American reports ^ — abounding in fossil plants, proper
to a temperate climate, at one time regarded as Miocene, but
now known to be Lower Eocene.' These beds, with their
' G. M. Dawson, Report on Foily-niiUli Paiallcl.
- Trans. Royal Society of Canada.
^ Ward, Repts. and Bulletins Am. Geol. Survey.
* Lesquereux's Tertiary Flora ; White and Ward on the Laramie Group;
Stevenson, Geological Relations of Lignitic Groups, Am. Phil. Soc. , Tune,
1875-
THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS 213
characteristic plants, have been traced into the British territory
north of the forty-ninth parallel, and it has been shown that
their fossils are identical with those of the McKenzie River
Valley, described by Heer as Miocene, and probably also with
those of Alaska, referred to the same age.^ Now this truly
Eocene flora of the temperate and northern parts of America
has so many species in common with that called Miocene in
Greenland, that its identity can scarcely be doubted. These
facts have led me to doubt the Miocene age of the upper
plant-bearing beds of Greenland, and more recently Mr. J.
Starkie Gardner has shown from comparison with the Eocene
flora of England and other considerations, that they are really
of that earlier date.-
In looking at these details, we might perhaps suppose that
no conditions of climate could permit the vegetation of the
neighbourhood of Disco in Greenland to be identical with
that of Colorado and Missouri, at a time when little difference
of level existed in the two regions. Either the southern flora
migrated north in consequence of a greater amelioration of
climate, or the northern flora moved southward as the climate
became colder. The same argument, as Gardner has ably
shown, applies to the similarity of the Tertiary plants of tem-
perate Europe to those of Greenland. If Greenland required
a temperature of about 50°, as Heer calculates, to maintain its
" Miocene " flora, the temperature of England must have been
at least 70°, and that of the south-western States still warmer.
It is to be observed, however, that the geographical arrange-
* G. M. Dawson, Report on the Geology of the Forty-ninth Parallel,
1875, where full details on these points may be found.
2 Nature, Dec. 12th, 1878 ; Publications Palreontographical Society ;
Reports to British Association. It seems certain that the so-called Miocene
of Rovey Tracey in Devon, and of Mull in Scotland, is really Eocene. The
Tertiary plant-bearing beds of Greenland are said by Nathorst to rest un-
cnnformably on the Cretaceous, and are characterized by JirClinlockia and
other forms known in the Eocene of Great Britain and Ireland.
214 THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS
merits of the American land in Cretaceous and early Eocene
times, included the existence of a great inland sea of warm
water extending at some periods as far north as the latitude of
55°, and that this must have tended to much equality of clima-
tical conditions.
We cannot certainly affirm anything respecting the origin
and migrations of these floras, but there are some probabilities
which deserve attention. The ferns and cycads of the so-
called Lower Cretaceous of Greenland are nothing but a
continuation of the previous Jurassic flora. Now this was
established at an equally early date in the Queen Charlotte
Islands,^ and still earlier in Virginia.- The presumption is,
therefore, that it came from the south. It has indeed the
facies of a southern hemisphere and insular flora, and pro-
bably spread itself northward as far as Greenland at a time
when the American land was long, narrow, and warm, and
when the ocean currents were carrying tepid water far toward
the arctic regions. The flora which succeeds this in the sec-
tions at Atane and Patoot has no special affinities with the
southern hemisphere, and is of a warm, temperate and conti-
nental character. It is very similar in its general aspect to
that of the Dakota group farther to the south, and this is
probably Middle Cretaceous. This flora must have originated
either somewhere in temperate America, or within the arctic
circle, and it must have replaced the older one by virtue of
increasing subsidence and gradual change of climate. It must
therefore have been connected with the depression of the land
which took place in the course of the Cretaceous. During this
movement it spread over all Western America, and as the land
again arose from the sea of the Niobrara chalk, it assumed an
aspect more suited to a cool climate, or moved southward,
' Reports Geological .Survey of Canad.i.
- Fontaine has well describeil the Mcsozoic flora of Virginia, Aincrican
journal of Science^ January, 1S79.
THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS 21 5
and finally abandoned the Arctic regions, perhaps continuing
to exist on the Pacific coast, and in sheltered places in the
north, till the warm inland seas of the Upper Cretaceous had
given place to the wide plains and landlocked brackish seas or
fresh-water lakes of the Laramie period (Eocene). Thus the
true Upper Cretaceous marks in the interior a cooler period
intervening between the Middle Cretaceous and the Lower
Eocene floras of Greenland.
This latter established itself in Greenland, and probably all
around the Arctic circle, in the mild period of the earliest
Eocene, and as the climate of the northern hemisphere became
gradually reduced from that time till the end of the Pliocene,
it marched on over both continents to the southward, chased
behind by the modern arctic flora, and eventually by the frost
and snow of the Glacial age. This history may admit of cor-
rection in details ; but, so far as present knowledge extends, it
is in the main not far from the truth.
Perhaps the first great question which it raises is that as to
the causes of the alternations of warm and cold climates in the
north, apparently demanded by the vicissitudes of the vegetable
kingdom. Here we may set aside the idea that in former
times plants were suited to endure greater cold than at present.
It is true that some of the fossil Greenland plants are of un-
known genera, and many are new species to us ; but we are
on the whole safe in affirming that they must have required
conditions similar to those necessary to their modern repre-
sentatives, except within such limits as we now find to hold in
similar cases among existing plants. Still we know that at the
present time many species found in the equable climate of
England will not live in Canada, though species to all ajipear-
ance similar in structure are natives of the latter. There is
also some reason to suppose that species, when new, may have
greater hardiness and adaptability than when in old age, and
verging toward extinction. In any case, these facts can account
2l6 THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS
for but a small part of the phenomena, which require to be ex-
plained by physical changes affecting the earth as a whole, or
at least the northern hemisphere. Many theoretical views
have been suggested on this subject, which will be found dis-
cussed elsewhere, and perhaps the most practical way to deal
with them here will be to refer to the actual conditions known
to have prevailed in connection with the introduction and
distribution of the principal floras which have succeeded each
other in geological history.
If we can assume that all the carbon now sealed up in lime-
stones and in coal was originally floating in the atmosphere
as carbon dioxide, then we would have a cause which might
seriously have affected the earlier land floras — that, for instance,
which may have existed in the Eozoic age, and those well
known to us in the Palaeozoic. Such an excess of carbonic
acid would have required some difference of constitution in
the plants themselves ; it would have afforded them a super-
abundance of wood-forming nutriment, and it would have
acted as an obstacle to the radiation of heat from the earth,
almost equal to the glass roof of a greenhouse, thus constituting
a great corrective of changes of temperature. Under such cir-
cumstances we might expect a peculiar and exuberant vegeta-
tion in the earlier geological ages, though this would not apply
to the later in any appreciable degree. In addition to this
we know that the geographical arrangements of our continents
were suited to the production of a great uniformity of climate.
Taking the American continent as the simpler, we know that
in this period there existed in the interior plateau between the
rudimentary eastern and western mountains a great inland
sea, so sheltered from the north that its waters contained hun-
dreds of species of corals, growing with a luxuriance unsur-
passed in the modern tropics. On the shores and islands of
such a sea we do not wonder that there should have been tree
ferns and gigantic lycopods. In the succeeding Carboniferous,
THE GKNESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS 21/
vast areas, both on the margins and in the interior of the
continent, were occupied with swampy flats and lagoons, the
atmosphere of which must have been loaded with vapour, and
rich in compounds of carbon, though the temperature may
have been lower than in the Devonian. There still remained,
however, more especially in the west, a remnant of the old
inland sea, which must have greatly aided in carrying a warm
temperature to the north.
If now we pass to the succeeding Jurassic age, we find a
more meagre and less widely distributed flora, corresponding
to less favourable geographical and climatal conditions, while
in the Cretaceous and Eocene ages a return to the old con-
dition of a warm Mediterranean in continuation of the Gulf of
Mexico gave those facilities for vegetable growth, which
carried plants of the temperate zone as far north as Greenland.
It thus appears that those changes of physical geography
and of the ocean currents to which reference is so often made
in these papers, apply to the question of the distribution or
plants in geological time.
These same causes may help us to deal with the peculiarities
of the great Glacial age, which may have been rendered ex-
ceptionally severe by the combination of several of the conti-
nental and oceanic causes of refrigeration. We must not
imagine, however, that the views of those extreme glacialists,
who suppose continental ice caps reaching half way to the
equator, are borne out by facts. In truth, the ice accumulat-
ing round the pole must have been surrounded by water, and
there must have been tree-clad islands in the midst of the icy
seas, even in the time of greatest refrigeration. This is proved
by the fact that in the lower Leda clay of Eastern Canada,
which belongs to the time of greatest submergence, and whose
fossil shells show sea water almost at the freezing point, there
are leaves of poplars and other plants which must have been
drifted from neighbouring shores. Similar remains occur in
2l8 THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS
clays of similar origin in the basin of the great lakes and in
the West, and are not Arctic plants, but members of the North
Temperate flora.^ These have been called " interglacial," but
there is no evidence to prove that they are not truly glacial.
Thus, while the arctic flora must have continued to exist within
the Arctic circle in the Glacial age, we have evidence that those
of the cold temperate and subarctic zones continued to exist
pretty far north. At the same time the warm temperate flora
would be driven to the south, except where sustained in insular
spots warmed by the equatorial currents. It would return north-
ward on the re-elevation of the land and the return of warmth.
If, however, our modern flora is thus one that has returned
from the south, this would account for its poverty in species
as compared with those of the early Tertiary. Groups of plants
descending from the north have been rich and varied. Re-
turning from the south they are like the shattered remains of
a beaten army. This, at least, has been the case with such re-
treating floras as those of the Lower Carboniferous, the Per-
mian, and the Jurassic, and possibly that of the Lower Eocene
of Europe.
The question of the supply of light to an Arctic flora is
much less difficult than some have imagined. The long
summer day is in this respect a good substitute for a longer
season of growth, while a copious covering of winter snow not
only protects evergreen plants from those sudden alternations
of temperature which are more destructive than intense frost,
and prevents the frost from penetrating to their roots, but
by the ammonia which it absorbs preserves their greenness.
According to Dr. Brown, the Danish ladies of Disco long ago
solved this problem.'' He informs us that they cultivate in
' Pleistocene Plants of Cannda, Dawson and Penhallow, Bull. Gcol.
Soij., America, 1S90. In Europe the Arctic flora extended, relatively to
present climate, farther south.
* /''Ion/la Discoaiia, Botanical Society of Edinburgh, 1S6S.
THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS 219
their houses most of our garden flowers, as roses, fuchsias, and
geraniums, showing that it is merely warmth, and not light
that is required to enable a subtropical flora to thrive in Green-
land. Even in Canada, which has a flora richer in some re-
spects than that of temperate Europe, growth is effectually
arrested by cold for nearly six months, and though there is
ample sunlight there is no vegetation. It is indeed not im-
possible that in the plans of the Creator the continuous
summer sun of the Arctic regions may have been made the
means for the introduction, or at least for the rapid growth and
multiplication, of new and more varied types of plants. It is a
matter of familiar observation in Canada that our hardy garden
flowers attain to a greater luxuriance and intensity of colour
in those more northern latitudes where they have the advan-
tage of long and sunny summer days.
Much, of course, remains to be known of the history of the
old floras whose fortunes I have endeavoured to sketch, and
which seem to have been driven like shuttlecocks from north
to south, and from south to north, especially on the American
continent, whose meridional extension seems to have given a
field specially suited for such operations.
This great stretch of the western continent from north to
south is also connected with the interesting fact that, when
new floras are entering from the Arctic regions, they appear
earlier in America than in Europe ; and that in times when the
old floras are retreating from the south, old genera and species
linger longer in America. Thus, in the Devonian and Cre-
taceous new forms of those periods appear in America long
before they are recognised in Europe, and in the modern
epoch forms that would be regarded in Europe as Miocene
still exist. Much confusion in reasoning as to the geological
ages of the fossil flora has arisen from want of attention to
this circumstance.
What we have learned respecting this wonderful history has
220 THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS
served strangely to change some of our preconceived ideas.
We must now be prepared to admit that an Eden might exist
even in Spitzbergen, that there are possibihties in this old
earth of ours which its present condition does not reveal to
us ; that the present state of the world is by no means the
best possible in relation to climate and vegetation ; that there
have been and might be again conditions which could con-
vert the ice-clad Arctic regions into blooming paradises, and
which, at the same time, would moderate the fervent heat of the
tropics. We are accustomed to say that nothing is impossible
with God ; but how little have we known of the gigantic pos-
sibilities which lie hidden under some of the most common of
His natural laws.
Yet these facts have been made the occasion of speculations
as to the spontaneous development of plants without any
direct creative intervention. It would, from this point of view,
be a nice question to calculate how many revolutions of climate
would suffice to evolve the first land plant ; what are the
chances that such plant would be so dealt with by physical
changes as to be preserved and nursed into a meagre flora like
that of the Upper Silurian or the Jurassic ; how many trans-
jjortations to (ireenland would suffice to promote such meagre
flora into the rich and abundant forests of the Upper Creta-
ceous, and to people the earth with the exuberant vegetation
of the early Tertiary. Such problems we may never be able
to solve. Probably they admit of no solution, unless we invoke
the action of a creative mind, operating through long ages, and
correlating with boundless power and wisdom all the energies
inherent in inorganic and organic nature. Even then we shall
perhaps be able to comprehend only the means by which, after
specific types have been created, they may, by the culture of
their Maker, be " sported " into new varieties or sub-species,
and thus fitted to exist under different conditions, or to occupy
higher places in the economy of nature.
THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS 221
Before venturing on such extreme speculations as some now
current on questions of this kind, we would require to know
the successive extinct floras as perfectly as those of the modern
world, and to be able to ascertain to what extent each species
can change, either spontaneously or under the influence of
struggle for existence, or expansion under favourable conditions,
and under Arctic semi-annual days and nights, or the shorter
days of the tropics. Such knowledge, if ever acquired, it may
take ages of investigation to accumulate. In any case the sub-
ject of this paper indicates one hopeful line of study with
the object of arriving at some comprehension of the laws of
creation.
While the facts above slightly sketched impress us with the
grand progress of the vegetable kingdom in geological time,
they equally show the persistence of vegetable forms as com-
pared with that of the dead continental masses and the decay
of some forms of life in favour of the introduction of others.
AVhen we find in the glacial beds the leaves of trees still
living in North America and Europe, and consider the vicissi-
tudes of elevation and submergence of the land, and of
Arctic and temperate climates which have occurred, we are
struck with the persistence of the weak things of life, as com-
pared with the changeableness of rocks and mountains. A
superficial observer might think the fern or the moss of a
granite hill a frail and temporary thing as compared with solid
and apparently everlasting rock. But just the reverse is the
ca.se. The plant is usually older than the mountain. But the
glacial age is a very recent thing. We have facts older than
this. As hinted in a previous paper, in the Laramie clays
associated with the Lignite beds of North-western Canada —
beds of Lower Eocene or early Tertiary age — which were de-
posited before the Rocky Mountains or the Himalayas had
reared their great peaks and ridges, and at a time when the
whole geography of the northern hemisphere was different
222 THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS
from what it is at present — are remains of very frail and deli-
cate plants which still live. I have shown that in these clays
there exist, side by side, the Sensitive Fern, Onoclea scnsibi/is,
and one of the delicate rock ferns, Davallia tenuifolia} The
first is still very abundant all over North America. The second
has ceased to exist in North America, but still survives in the
valleys of the Himalayas. These two little plants, once prob-
ably very widely diffused over the northern hemisphere, have
continued to exist through the millenniums separating the
Cretaceous from the present time, and in which the greater
part of our continent was again and again under the sea, in
which great mountain chains have been rolled up and sculptured
into their present forms, and in which giant forms, both ot
animal and plant life, have begun, culminated and passed
away. Truly God hath chosen the weak things of the world to
confound those that are strong.
Other plants equally illustrate the decadence of important
types of vegetable life. In the beautiful family of the Magnolias
there exists in America a most remarkable and elegant tree,
whose trunk attains sometimes a diameter of 7 feet and a
height of 80 or 90 feet. Its broad deep green leaves are
singularly truncate at the end, as if artificially cut off, and in
spring it puts forth a wealth of large and brilliant orange and
yellow fiowers, from which it obtains the name of Tulip tree.
It is the Liriodendron tullpifera of botanists, and the sole
species of its genus. This Tulip tree has a history. All
through the Tertiary beds we find leaves referable to the genus,
and belonging not to one species only, but to several, and as
we go back into the Cretaceous, the species seem to become
more numerous. Many of them have smaller leaves than the
modern species, others larger, and some have forms even more
quaint than that of the existing Tulij) tree. The oldest that I
have seen in Canada is one from the Upper Cretaceous of
* Report on 49th Parallel, 1875.
THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS 223
Port McNeil in the north of Vancouver Island, which is as
large as that of the modern species, and very similar in form.
Thus this beautiful vegetable type culminated long geological
ages ago, and was represented by many species, no doubt occu-
pying a prominent place in the forests of the northern hemi-
sphere. To-day only a single species exists, in our warmer re-
gions, to keep up the memory of this almost perished genus ;
but that species is one of our most beautiful trees.
The history of the Sequoias or giant Cypresses, of which two
species now exist in limited areas in California, is still more
striking. These giant trees, monsters of the vegetable king-
dom, are, strange to say, very limited in their geographical
range. The greater of the two. Sequoia gigantea, the giant
tree par excelknce, seems limited to a few groves in California.
At first sight this strikes us as anomalous, especially as we find
that the tree will grow somewhat widely both in Europe and
America when its seeds are sown in suitable soil. The mystery
is solved when we learn that the two existing species are but
survivors of a genus once diffused over the whole northern
hemisphere, and represented by many species, constituting,
in the Later Cretaceous and Eocene ages, vast and dark forests
extending over enormous areas of our continents, and forming
much of the material of the thick and widely distributed
Lignite beds of North-western America. Thus the genus has
had its time of expansion and prevalence, and is now prob-
ably verging on extinction, not because there are not suitable
habitats, but either because it is now old and moribund, or
because other and newer forms have now a preference in the
existing conditions of existence.
The Plane trees, the Sassafras, the curious Ginkgo tree or
fern-leaved yew of Japan, are cases of similar decadence of
genera once represented by many species, while other trees, like
the Willows and Poplars, the Maples, the Birches, the Oaks
and the Pines, though of old date, are still as abundant as
S. E, 16
224 THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS
they ever were, and some genera would seem even to have
increased in number of species, though on the whole the flora
of our modern woods is much less rich than those of the
Miocene and Eocene, or even than that of the Later Cre-
taceous. The early Tertiary periods were, as we know, times of
exuberant and gigantic animal life on the land, and it is in con-
nection with this that the vegetable world seems to have
attained its greatest variety and luxuriance. Even that early
post-glacial age in which primitive man seems first to have
spread himself over our continents was one richer both in
animal and plant life than the present. The geographical
changes which closed this period and inaugurated the modern
era seem to have reduced not only the area of the continents
but the variety of land life in a very remarkable manner. Thus
our last lesson from the genesis and migrations of plants is
the humbling one that the present world is by no means the
best possible in so far as richness of vegetable and animal life
is concerned.
Reference has been made to the utility of fossil plants as
evidence of climate ; but the subject deserves more detailed
notice. I have often pondered on the nature of the climate
evidenced by the floras of the Devonian and Carboniferous; but
the problem is a difficult one, not only because of the peculiar
character of the plants themselves, so unlike those of our time,
but because of the probably different meteorological conditions
of the period. It is easy to see that a flora of tree-ferns, great
lycopods and pines is more akin to that of oceanic islands in
warm latitudes than anything else that we know. But the
Devonian and Carboniferous })lants did not flourish in oceanic
islands, but for the most part on continental areas of consider-
able dimensions, though probably more flat and less elevated
than those of the present day. They also grew, from Arctic
latitudes, almost, if not altogether, to the equator ; and though
there are generic differences in the plants of these periods in
THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS 225
the southern hemisphere, yet these do not affect the general
facies. There are, for example, characteristic Lepidodendroids
in the Devonian and Carboniferous of Brazil, Australia, and
South Africa. If now we consider the plants a little more in
detail, coniferous and taxine trees grow now in very different
latitudes and climates. There is therefore nothing so very
remarkable in their occurrence. The great group of Cordaites
may have been equally hardy ; but it is noteworthy that their
geographical distribution is more limited. In Europe, for
example, they are more characteristic in France than in Great
Britain. Ferns and Lycopods and Mares'-tails are also cosmo-
politan, but the larger species belong to the warmer climates,
and nowhere at present do they become so woody and so com-
plex in structure as they were in the older geological periods.
At the present day, however, they love moisture rather than
aridity, and uniformity of temperature rather than extreme
light and heat. The natural inference would be that in these
older periods geographical and other conditions must have
conspired to produce a uniform and moist climate over a large
portion of the continents. The geographical conditions of
the Carboniferous age, and the distribution of animal life on
the sea and land, confirm the conclusion based on the flora.
Further, if, as seems probable, there was a larger proportion of
carbon dioxide in the atmosphere than at present, this would
not only directly affect the growth of plants, but would im-
pede radiation, and so prevent escape of heat by that means,
while the moisture exhaled from inland seas and lagoons and
vastly extended swamps, would tend in the same direction.
It would, however, be a mistake to infer that there were not
local differences of climate. I have elsewhere^ advocated the
theory that the great ridge of boulders, the New Glasgow con-
glomerate, which forms one margin of the coal field of Picton,
* " Acadian Geology,'" Caiboniferous ol Picton.
226 THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS
in Nova Scotia, is an ice-formed ridge separating the area of
accumulation of the great thirty-six feet seam from an outer
area in which aqueous conditions prevailed, and little coal was
formed. In this case, an ice-laden sea, carrying boulders on
its floes and fields of ice, must have been a few miles distant
from forests of Lepidodendra, Cordaites, and Sigillarice, and the
climate must have been anything but warm, at least at certain
seasons. Nor have we a right to infer that the growth of the
coal-plants was rapid. Stems, with woody axes and a thick
bark, containing much fibrous and thick-walled cellular tissue,
are not to be compared v/ith modern succulent plants, es-
pecially when we consider the sparse and rigid foliage of many
of them. Our conclusion should, therefore, be that geographi-
cal conditions and the abundance of carbon dioxide in the
atmosphere favoured a moist climate and uniform temperature,
and that the flora was suited to these conditions.
As to the early Mesozoic flora, I have already suggested that
it must have been an invader from the south, for which the
intervening Permian age had made way by destroying the
Palaeozoic flora. This was probably effected by great earth-
movements changing geographical conditions. But in the
Mesozoic the old conditions to some extent returned, and the
Carboniferous plants being extinct, their places were taken by
pines, lycopods, and ferns, whose previous home had been in the
insular regions of the tropics, and which, as climatal conditions
improved, pushed their way to the Arctic circle. But, being
derivatives of warm regions, their vitality and capacity for
variation were not great, and they only locally and in favourable
conditions became great coal producers. The new flora of the
Later Cretaceous and the Tertiary, as previously stated, origi-
nated in the Arctic, and marched southward.
These newer Cretaceous plants presented from the first the
generic aspects of modern vegetation, and so enable us much
better to gauge their climatal conditions. In general, they do
THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS 22/
not indicate tropical heat in the far north, but only that of the
warm temperate zone ; but this in some portions of the period
certainly extends to the middle of Greenland, unless, without
any evidence, we suppose that the Cretaceous and lower Tertiary
plants differed in hardiness of constitution from their modern
representatives. They prove, however, considerable oscillations
of climate. Gardner, Nathorst and Reid have shown this in
Europe, and that it extends from the almost tropical flora of
the lower Eocene to the Arctic flora of the Pleistocene. In
America, owing, as Grey has suggested, to its great north and
south extension, the changes were more regular and gradual.
In the warmer periods of the Cretaceous, the flora as far north
as 55° was similar to that of Georgia and Northern Florida at
the present day, while in the cooler period of the Laramie
(Lower Eocene, or more probably Paleocene) it was not un-
like that of the Middle States. In the Pleistocene, the flora
indicates a boreal temperature in the Glacial age. Thus there
are no very extreme contrasts, but the evident fact of a warm
temperate or sub-tropical climate extending very far north at
the same times when Greenland had a temperate climate. As
I have elsewhere shown, ^ discoveries in various parts of North
America are beginning to indicate the precise geographical
conditions accompanying the warmer and colder climates.
It would be wrong to leave this subject without noticing
that remarkable feature in the southward movement of the
later floras, to which I believe Prof Gray was the first to
direct attention. In those periods when a warm cliniate pre-
vailed in the Arctic regions, the temperate flora must have been,
like the modern Arctic flora, circumpolar. When obliged to
migrate to the south, it had to follow the lines of the con-
tinents, and so to divide into separate bands. Three of these
at present are the floras of ^^'estern Europe, Eastern Asia,
and Eastern America, all of which have many re[)resentative
' Trans. Royal Society of Canaila, 1S90-1.
228 THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS
species. They are separated by oceans and by belts of land
occupied by plants which have not been obliged to migrate.
Thus, while the flora of the Eastern United States resembles
that of China and Japan, that of California and Oregon is
distinct from both, and represents a belt of old species retained
in place by the continued warmth of the Pacific shore, and the
continuous extension of the American continent to the south
affording them means of retreat in the Glacial age. Were the
plants of China and Eastern America enabled to return to the
Arctic, they would then reunite into one flora. Gray compares
the process of their separation to the kind of selection which
might be made by a botanical distributor who had the whole
collection placed in his hands, with instructions to give one
species of each genus to Europe, to Eastern Asia, and to
Eastern America ; and if there was only one species in a
genus, or if one remained over, this was to be thrown into one
of the regions, with a certain preference in favour of America
and Asia. This remarkable kind of geographical selection
opens a wide field not only for thought, but for experiment on
the actual relationship of the representative species. There is
a similar field for comparison between the trees of Georgia in
latitude 30° to 35°, and the same species or their representa-
tives as they existed in Cretaceous times in the latitudes of
50° and 60°. The two floras, as I know from actual com-
parison, are very similar.
One word may be said here as to use of fossil [ilants in
determining geological time. In this 1 need only point to
the fact of my having defined in Canada three Devonian
floras, a Lower, Middle, and Upper, and that Mr. Whiteaves, in
his independent study of the fossil fishes, has vindicated my
conclusions. There arc also in Nova Scotia three distinctive
sub-floras of the Tower, Middle, and Upper Carboniferous.' I
' Transactions Royal Society of Canada, 1SS3 to 1S91.
THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS 229
have verified these for the Devonian and Carboniferous of the
United States, and to some extent also for those of Europe.
To the same effect is the recognition of the Kootanie or
Lower Cretaceous, the Middle Cretaceous, Upper Cretaceous,
Laramie and Miocene in Western Canada. These have in all
cases corresponded with the indications of animal fossils ^ and
of stratigraphy. Fossil plants have been less studied in this
connection than fossil animals, but I have no hesitation in
affirming that, with reference to the broader changes of the
earth's surface, any competent paleeobotanist is perfectly safe
in trusting to the evidence of vegetable fossils.
It may be objected that such evidence will be affected by the
migrations of plants, so that we cannot be certain that identical
jpecies flourished in Greenland and in temperate America at
the same time. If such species originated in Greenland and
migrated southward, the specimens found at the south may be
much newer than those in the north. This, no doubt, is
locally true, but the migrations of plants, though slow, occupy
less time than that of a great geological period. It may also be
objected that the flora of swamps, plains, and mountain tops
would differ at any one period. This also is true, but the same
difiiculty applies to animals of the deep sea, the shore, and the
land ; and these diversities of station have always to be taken
into account by the paleontologist.
References : — Report on the Eiian or Devonian Plants of Canada,
Montreal, 1871. Article in Princeton Keview on Genesis and
Migrations of Plants. " The Geological History of Plants," London
and New York, 188S and 1892. Papers on Fossil Plants of Western
Canada, 1883, and following volumes of Transactions of Royal
Society of Canada.
Note. — Since writing the above, I have obtained access to Dal! and
Harris' " Neocene Correlation Papers," which throw some additional
' Reports on Fossil Plants of the Devonian and Lower Carboniferous.
230 THE GENESIS AND MIGRATIONS OF PLANTS
light on the Cretaceous and Eocene Floras of Alaska, which, from its high
northern latitude, affords a good parallel to Greenland. It would appear
that plant beds occur in that territory at two horizons. One of these
(Cape Beaufort), according to Lesquereux and Ward, holds species ot
Neocomian Age, and apparently equivalent to the Kootanie of British
Columbia and the Kome of Greenland. The other, which occurs at
several localities (Elukak, Port Graham, etc.), has a flora evidently of
Laramie (Eocene) age, equivalent to the "Miocene" of Heer and Les-
quereux, and to the Lignite Tertiary of Canada. The plants are accom-
panied by lignite, and evidently in siiii, and clearly prove harmony with
Greenland and British Cohimbia in two of the periods of high Arctic
temperature indicated above.
THE GROWTH OF COAL.
DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF
DR. SCHIMPER,
OF STRASBURG,
The Author of "La Flore du Monde Primitif," and
many other contributions to fo.ssil botanv,
AND OF
DR. H. R. GOEPPERT,
WHOSE Essay on the Structure and Formation of Coal
WAS One of my first Guides in its Study.
Questions of Growth and Driftage — Testimony of a
Block of Coal under the Microscope — Different
Kinds of Coal — Conditions Necessary to Accumu-
lation IN situ — Coal Beds and their Accompani-
ments— Underclays and Roofs — Vegetable Remains
— History of Coal Groups— Summary of Evidence —
Subsidence of Coal Areas— Stigmaria and other
Coal Plants — Later Coal Accumulations — The
Story and Uses of Coal
Part of a Com. Group, at the South Joggins, wiili uikI-ji clays am
erect trees and Calamites (p. 238).
CHAPTER IX.
THE GROWTH OF COAL.
MY early boyhood was spent on the Coal formation rocks
and in the vicinity of collieries ; and among my first
natural history collections, in a childish museum of many
kinds of objects, were some impressions of fern leaves from the
shales of the coal series. It came to pass in this way that the
Carboniferous rocks were those which I first studied as an
embryo geologist, and much of my later work has consisted in
collecting and determining the plants of that ancient period, and
in studying microscopic sections of coals and fossil woods ac-
companying them. For this reason, and because I have pub:-
lished so much on this subject, my first decision was to leave
it out of these Salient Points: but on second thoughts it
seemed that this might be regarded as a dereliction of duty ;
more especially as some of the conclusions supposed to be the
best established on this subject have recently been called in
question.
Had I been writing a few years ago, I might have referred to
the mode of formation of coal as one of the things most surely
settled and understood. The labours of many eminent geolo-
gists, microscopists and chemists in the old and the new worlds
had shown that coal nearly always rests upon old soil-surfaces
penetrated with roots, and that coal beds have in their roofs
erect trees, the remains of the last forests that grew upon them.
Logan and the writer have illustrated this in the case of the
series of more than eighty successive coal beds exposed at the
234 THE GROWTH OF COAL
South Joggins, and of the great thirty feet seam of the Picton
coal series, whose innumerable laminre have all been subjected
to careful scrutiny, and have shown unequivocal evidence of
land surfaces accompanying the deposition of the coal. Micro-
scopical examination has proved that these coals are composed
of the materials of the same trees whose roots are found in the
underclays, and their stems and leaves in the roof shales ; that
much of the material of the coal has been partially subjected to
subaerial decay at the time of its accumulation ; and that in
this, ordinary coal differs from bituminous shale, earthy bit-
umen and some kinds of cannel, which have been formed under
water ; that the matter remaining as coal consists almost entirely
of epidermal tissues, which being suberose or corky in char-
acter are highly carbonaceous, very durable and impermeable
by water, and are, hence, the best fitted for the production of
pure coal ; and finally, that the vegetation and the climatal and
geographical features of the coal period were eminently fitted
to produce in the vast swamps of that period precisely the
effects observed. All these points and many others have been
thoroughly worked out for both European and American coal
fields, and seemed to leave no doubt on the subject. But
several years ago certain microscopists observed in slices of
coal, thin layers full of spore cases, a not unusual circumstance,
since these were shed in vast abundance by the trees of the
coal forests, and because they contain suberose matter of the
same character with epidermal tissues generally. Immediately
we were informed that all coal consists of spores, and this being
at once accepted by the unthinking, the results of the labours
of many years are thrown aside in favour of this crude and
partial theory. A little later, a German microscopist has
thought proper to describe coal as made up of minute algne, and
tries to reconcile this view with the appearances, devising at the
same time a new and formidable nomenclature of generic and
specific names, which would seem largely to represent mere
THE GROWTH OF COAL 235
fragments of tissues. Still later, some local facts in a French
coal field have induced an eminent observer of that country to
revive the drift theory of coal, in opposition to that of growth
in situ. Views of this kind have also recendy been advanced
in England by some of those younger men who would earn dis-
tinction rather by overthrowing the work of their seniors than
by building on it. These writers base their conclusions on a
few exceptional facts, as the occasional occurrence of seams of
coal without distinct underlays, and the occurrence of clay
partings showing aquatic conditions in the substance of thick
coals ; and they fail to discern the broader facts which these ex-
ceptions confirm. Let us consider shordy the essential nature
of coal, and some of the conditions necessary to its forma-
tion.
A block of the useful mineral which is so important an element
in national wealth, and so essential to the comfort of our winter
homes, may tell us much as to its history if properly interro-
gated, and what we cannot learn from it alone we may be taught
by studying it in the mine whence it is obtained, and in the
cliffs and cuttings where the edges of the coaly beds and their
accompaniments are exposed.
Our block of coal, if anthracite, is almost pure carbon. It
bituminous coal, it contains also a certain amount of hydrogen,
which in combination with carbon enables it to yield gas and
coal tar, and which causes it to burn with flame. If, again, we
examine some of the more imperfect and more recent coals, the
brown coals, so called, we shall find that in composition and
texture they are intermediate between coal proper and hardened
or compressed peat. Now such coaly rocks can, under the
present constitution of nature, be produced only in one way,
namely, by the accumulation of vegetable matter, for vegetation
alone has the power of decomposing the carbonic acid of the
atmosphere, and accumulating it as carbon. This we see in
modern times in the vegetable soil, in peaty beds, and in
236 THE GROWTH OF COAL
vegetable muck accumulated in ponds and similar places.
Such vegetable matter, once accumulated, requires only pressure
and the changes which come of its own slow putrefaction to be
converted into coal.
But in order that it may accumulate at all, certain conditions
are necessary. The first of these includes the climatal and or-
ganic arrangements necessary for abundant vegetable growth.
The second is the facility for the preservation of the vegetable
matter, without decay or intermixture with earthy substances ;
and this, for a long time, till a great thickness of it accumulates.
The third is its covering up by other deposits, so as to be com-
pressed and excluded from air. It is evident that when we have
to consider the formation of a bed of coal several feet in thick-
ness, and spread, perhaps, over hundreds of square miles, many
things must conduce to such a result, and the wonder is perhaps
rather that such conditions should ever have been effectively
combined. Yet this has occurred at difierent periods of geo-
logical history and in many places, and in some localities it has
been so repeated as to produce many beds of coal in succes-
sion.
Let us now question our block of coal as to its origin, sup-
posing it to be a piece of ordinary bituminous coal, or still better,
a specimen of one of the impure somewhat shaly coals which
one sometimes finds accidentally in the coal bin. In look-
ing at the edge of our specimen we observe that it has a " reed "
or grain, which corresponds with the lamination or bedding of
the seam of coal from which it came. Looking at this carefully,
we shall see that there are many thin layers of bright shining
coal, and the more of these usually the better the coal. These
layers, in tracing them along, we observe often to thin out and
disappear. They are not very continuous. If our specimen is
an impure coal, we will find that it readily splits along the sur-
faces of these layers, and that when so split, we can see that each
layer of shining coal has certain markings, perhaps the flattened
THE GROWTH OF COAL 237
ribs and scars of Sigillaria or other coal-formation trees on
its surface. In other words, the layers of fine coal are usually
flattened trunks and branches of trees, or perhaps rather of the
imperishable and impermeable bark of such trees, the wood
having perished. A few very thin layers of shining coal we may
also find to consist of the large-ribbed leaves of the plant known
as Cordaites. This kind of coaly matter then usually represents
trunks of trees which in a prostrate and flattened state may
constitute more than half of the bulk of ordinary coal-formation
coal. Under the microscope this variety of coal shows little
structure, and this usually the thickened cells of cortical tissue.
Intervening between these layers we perceive lamina, more or
less thick and continuous, of what we may call dull coal, black
but not shining ; resembling, in fact, the appearance of cannel
coal. If we split the coal along one side of these layers, and
examine it in a strong light, we may see shreds of leaf stalks
and occasionally even of fern leaves, or skeletons of these, show-
ing the veins, and many flattened disc-like bodies, spore cases
and macrospores, shed by the plants which make up the coal.
These layers represent what may be called compressed
vegetable mould or muck, and this is by no means a small
constituent of many coals. This portion of the coal is the
most curious and interesting in microscopic slices, showing a
great variety of tissues and many spores and spore cases.
Lastly, we find on the surface of the coal, when split parallel to
the bedding, a quantity of soft shining fibrous material, known
as mineral charcoal or mother coal, which in some varieties of
the mineral is very abundant, in others much more rare. This
is usually too soft and incoherent to be polished in thin slices
for the microscope ; but if boiled for a length of time in nitric
acid, so as to separate all the mineral matter contained in it,
the fibres sometimes become beautifully translucent and reveal
the tissues of the wood of various kinds of Carboniferous trees,
more especially of Calamites, Cordaites and Sigillaria;. Fibres
s. E. 17
TflE GROWTH OF COAL
of mineral charcoal prepared in this way are often very beauti-
ful microscopic objects under high powers ; and this material of
the coal is nothing else than little blocks of rotten wood and
fibrous bark, broken up and scattered over the surface of the
forming coal bed. All these materials, it must be observed, have
been so compressed that the fragments of decayed wood have
been flattened into films, the vegetable mould consolidated into
a stony mass, and trunks of great trees converted by enormous
pressure into laminae of shining coal, a tenth of an inch in thick-
ness, so that the whole material has been reduced to perhaps
one-hundredth of its original volume.
Restoring the mass in imagination to its original state, what
do we find ? A congeries of prostate trunks with their interstices
filled with vegetable muck or mould, and occasional surfaces
where rotten wood, disintegrated into fragments, was washed
about in local floods or rain storms, and thus thrown over the
surface. Lyell seems very nearly to have hit the mark when
he regarded the conditions of the great dismal swamp of
Virginia as representing those of a nascent coal field. We
have only to realize in the coal period the existence of a dense
vegetation very different from that of modern Virginia, of a
humid and mild climate, and of a vast extension of low
swampy plains, to restore the exact conditions of the coal
swamps.
But how does this correspond with the facts observed in
mines and sections ? To the late Sir William Logan is due the
merit of observing that in South \^■ales the underclays or beds
of indurated clay and earth underlying the coal seams are
usually filled with the long cyUndrical rootlets and branching
roots of a curious plant, very common in the coal formation,
the Stigmaria. He afterwards showed that the same fact
occurs in the very numerous coal beds exposed in the fine
section cut by the tides of the Bay of Fundy, in the coal rocks
of Nova Scotia. In that district I have myself followed up
THE GROWTH OF COAL 239
his observations, examining in detail every one of eighty-one
Coal Groups, as I have called them, each consisting of at
least one bed of coal, large or small, with its accompaniments,
and in many cases of several small seams with intervening
clays or shales. ^ In nearly every case the Stigmaria "under-
clay " is distinctly recognisable, and often in a single coal
group there are several small seams separated by underclays
with roots and rootlets. These underclays are veritable fossil
soils ; sometimes bleached clays or sands, like the subsoils of
modern swamps ; sometimes loamy or sandy, or of the nature
of hardened vegetable mould. They rarely contain any remains
of aquatic animals, or of animals of any kind, but are filled
with stigmaria roots and rootlets, and sometimes hold a few
prostrate stems of trees.- While the underclay is thus a fossil
soil, the roof or bed above the coal, usually of a shaly char-
acter, is full of remains of leaves and stems and fruits, and
often holds erect stumps, the remains of the last trees that
grew in the swamp before it was finally covered up.
Some of the thinnest coals, and some beds so thin and
impure that they can scarcely be called coals at all, are the
most instructive. Witness the following from my section ol
the South Joggins.
Coal Group i, of Division 3, is the highest of the series. Its
section is as follows : —
" Grey argillaceous shale.
Coal, I inch.
Grey argillaceous underclay, Stigmaria.
"The roof holds abundance of fern leaves {Alethopteris
* For details stt Journal Geol. Society of London, 1865 ; and " Acadian
Oeology," last edition, 1S91.
- At the South Joggins, in two or three cases, beds of bituminous shale
full of Naiadites and Cyprids have by elevation and drying become fit
for the growth of trees with stigmaria roots ; but this is quite e.xceptional,
no doubt arising from the accidental draining of lakes or lagoons on their
elevation above the sea level.
240 THE GROWTH OF COAL
lonchitica). The coal is coarse and earthy, with much epider-
mal and bast tissue, spore cases, etc., vascular bundles of ferns
and impressions of bark of Sigillaria and leaves of Cordaites.
It may be considered as a compressed vegetable soil resting on
a subsoil full of rootlets of Stigmaria." In this case the coal is
an inch in thickness, but there are many beds where the coal
is a mere film, and supports great erect stems of Sigillaria,
sending downward their roots in the form of branching
Stigmarise into the underclay, thus proving that the Stigmaria:;
of the underclays are the roots of the Sigillarias of the coals
and their roofs.
Here is another example which may be called a coal group,
and is No. 1 1 of the same division :
" Grey argillaceous shale, erect Calamites.
Coal, I inch.
Grey argillaceous underclay, Stigmaria, ift. 6in.
Coal, 2 inches.
Grey argillaceous underclay, Stigmaria, 4 in.
Coal, I inch.
Grey argillaceous underclay, Stigmaria.
" This is an alternation of thin, coarse coals with fossil soils.
The roof shale contains erect Calamites, which seem to have
been the last vegetation which grew on the surface of the upper
coal."
Such facts, with many minor varieties, extend through the
whole eighty-one coal groups of this remarkable section, as
any one may see by referring to the paper and work cited in
the preceding note. It is possibly because in most coal fields
the smaller and commercially useless beds are so little open to
observation, that so crude ideas derived merely from imperfect
access to the beds that are worked exist among geologists. The
following summary of facts may perhaps serve to place the
evidence as to the mode of accumulation of coal fairly before
the reader : —
THE GROWTH OF COAL 24 1
(i) The occurrence of Stigmaria under nearly every bed of
coal proves, beyond question, that the material was accum-
ulated by growth /;/ situ, while the character of the sediments
intervening between the beds of coal proves with equal cer-
tainty the abundant transport of mud and sand by water. In
other words, conditions similar to those of the swampy deltas
of great rivers, or the swampy flats of the interiors of great con-
tinents, are implied.
(2) The true coal consists principally of the flattened bark
of sigillaroid and other trees, intermixed with leaves of ferns
and Cordaiies, and other herbaceous debris, including vast
numbers of spores and spore cases, and with fragments of
decayed wood constituting "mineral charcoal,'' all their
materials having manifestly alike grown and accumulated where
we find them.
(3) The microscopical structure and chemical composition
of the beds of cannel coal and earthy bitumen, and of the
more highly bituminous and carbonaceous shales, show them
to have been of the nature of the fine vegetable mud which
accumulates in the ponds and shallow lakes of modern swamps.
These beds are always distinct from true subaerial coal.
When such fine vegetable sediment is mixed, as is often the
case, with mud, it becomes similar to the bituminous lime-
stone and calcareo-bituminous shales of the coal measures.
(4) A few of the underclays which support beds of coal
are of the nature of the vegetable mud above referred to ; but
the greater part are argillo-arenaceous in composition, v^-ith
little vegetable matter, and bleached by the drainage from
them of water containing the products of vegetable decay.
They are, in short, loamy or clay soils in the chemical con-
dition in which we find such soils under modern bogs, and
must have been sufficiently above water to admit of drainage.
The absence, or small quantity of sulphides, and the occur-
rence of carbonate of iron in connection with them, prove that
242 THE GROWTH OF COAL
when they existed as soils, rain water, and not sea water, per-
colated them.
(5) The coal and the fossil trees present many evidences of
subaerial conditions. Most of the erect and prostrate trees
had become hollow shells of bark before they were finally
imbedded, and their wood had broken into cubical pieces of
mineral charcoal. Land snails and galley worms {Xy/obius)
crept into them, and they became dens or traps for reptiles.
Large quantities of mineral charcoal occur on the surfaces of
all the larger beds of coal. None of these appearances could
have been produced by subaqueous action.
(6) Though the roots of Sigi/iaria bear some resemblance
to the rhizomes of certain aquatic plants, yet structurally they
have much resemblance to the roots of Cycads, which the
stems also resemble. Further, the Sigi/Iarhi; grew on the
same soils which supported conifers, Lepidodendra, Cordaitcs,
and ferns, plants which could not have grown in water. Again,
with the exception, perhaps, of some Pinnularue and Astero-
phyllites, and Rhizocarpean spores, there is a remarkable
absence from the coal measures of any form of properly
aquatic vegetation.
(7) The occasional occurrence of marine or brackish-water
animals in the roofs of coal beds, or even in the coal itself,
affords no evidence of subaqueous accumulation, since the
same thing occurs in the case of modern submarine forests.
Such facts merely imply that portions of the areas of coal
accumulation were liable to inundation of a character so
temporary as not finally to close the process, as happened when
at last a roof shale was deposited by water over the coal.
Cannel coals and bituminous shales holding mussel-like shells,
fish scales, etc., imj)ly the existence sometimes for long periods
of ponds, lakes or lagoons in the coal swamps, but ordinary
coal did not accumulate in these. It is in the cannels and
similar subaqueous coals that the macrospores which I
THE GROWTH OF COAL 243
attribute in great part to aquatic plants, allied to modern
Salvinia, etc., are chiefly found. ^
For these and other reasons, some of which are more fully
stated in the papers referred to, while I admit that the areas of
coal accumulation were frequently submerged, I must maintain
that the true coal is a subaerial accumulation by vegetable
growth on soils wet and swampy, it is true, but not submerged.
I would add the further consideration, already urged elsewhere,
that in the case of the fossil forests associated with the coal, the
conditions of submergence and silting-up which have pre-
served the trees as fossils, must have been precisely those
which were fatal to their existence as living plants, a fact
sufficiently evident to us in the case of modern submarine
forests, but often overlooked by the framers of theories of the
accumulation of coal.
It seems strange that the occasional inequalities of the floors
of the coal beds, the sand or gravel ridges which traverse them,
the channels cut through the coal, the occurrence of patches
of sand, and the insertion of wedges of such material splitting
the beds, have been regarded by some able geologists as
evidences of the aqueous origin of coal. In truth, these
appearances are of constant occurrence in modern swamps
and marshes, more especially near their margins, or where
they are exposed to the effects of ocean storms or river inun-
dations. The lamination of the coal has also been adduced
as a proof of aqueous deposition ; but the miscroscope shows,
as I have elsewhere pointed out, that this is entirely different
from aqueous lamination, and depends on the superposition of
successive generations of more or less decayed trunks of trees
and beds of leaves. The lamination in the truly aqueous can-
nels and carbonaceous shales is of a very different character.
It is scarcely necessary to remark that in the above summary
' "Geological History of Plants," Bulletin Chicago Academy oj
Sciences, 1886.
244 I'HE GROWTH OF COAI-
I have had reference principally to my o'.vn observations in the
coal formation of Nova Scotia; but similar facts have been
detailed by many other observers in other districts. ^
A curious point in connection with the origin of coal is the
question how could vegetable matter be accumulated in such
a pure condition ? There is less difficulty in regard to this if
we consider the coal as a swamp accumulation in situ. It is
in this way that the purest vegetable accumulations take place
at present, whereas in lakes and at the mouths of rivers vege-
table matter is always mixed up with mud. Coal swamps,
however, must have been liable to submergences or to tem-
porary inundations, and it is no doubt to these that we have to
attribute the partings of argillaceous matter often found in coal
beds, as well as the occasional gulches cut into the coal and
filled with sand and lenticular masses of earthy matter. To a
similar cause we must also attribute the association of cannel
with ordinary coal. The cannel is really a pulpy, macerate
mass of vegetable matter accumulated in still water, surrounded
and perhaps filled with growing aquatic herbage. Hence it is
in such beds that we find the greatest accumulations of macro-
spores, derived, probably, in great part from aquatic plants.
Euckland long ago compared the matter of cannel to the
semifluid discharge of a bursting bog, and Alex. Agassiz has
more recently shown that in times of flood the vegetable muck
of the Everglades of Florida flows out in thick inky streams,
and may form large beds of vegetable matter having the
character of the materials of cannel. It is evident that in
swamps of so great extent as those of the coal formation, there
must have been shallow lakes and ponds, and wide sluggish
streams, forming areas for the accumulation of vegetable debris
and this readily accounts for the association of ordinary beds
of coal with those of cannel, and with bituminous shales or
' Especially Brongniart, Goeppert, Hawkshaw, Lyell, Logan, De la
Boclie, Beaumont, Biiiney, Rogers, Lcsquereux, Williamson, Grand' Eury.
THE GROWTH OF COAL 245
earthy bitumen, as well as fur the occurrence of scales of fish
and other aquatic animals in such beds. Lyell's interesting
observation of the submerged areas at New Madrid, keeping
free of Mississippi mud, because fringed with a filter of cane-
brake, shows that the areas of coal accumulation might often
be inundated v.ithout earthy deposit, if, as seems probable,
they were fringed with dense brakes of calamites, sheltering
them from the influx of muddy water. It seems also certain
that the water of the coal areas would be brown and laden
with imperfect vegetable acids, like that of modern bogs, and
such water has usually little tendency to deposit any mineral
matter, even in the pores of vegetable fragments. The only
exception to this is one which also occurs in modern swamps,
namely, the tendency to deposit iron, either as carbonate (Clay
Ironstone), or sulphide (Iron Pyrite), both of which are
products of modern bogs, and equally characteristic of the coal
swamps.
Where great accumulations of sediment are going on, as at
the mouths of modern rivers, there is a tendency to subsidence
of the area of the deposit, owing to its weight. This applies,
perhaps, to a greater extent to coal areas. Thus the area of a
coal swamp would ultimately sink so low as to be overflowed,
and a roof shale would be deposited to bury up the bed of
coal, and transmit it to future ages, chemically, and mechanically
changed by pressure and by that slow decomposition which
gradually converts vegetable matter into carbon and hydrocar-
bons. The long continuance and great extent of these alterna-
tions of growth and subsidence is perhaps the most extraordinary
fact of all. At the South Joggins, if we include the surfaces
having erect trees with those having beds of coal, the process
of growth of a forest or bog, and its burial by subsidence and
deposition must have been repeated about a hundred times
before the final burial of the whole under the thick sandstones
of the Upper Carboniferous and Permian.
246 THE GROWTH OF COAL
Mention has been made of Sigillaria and other trees of the
coal formation period. These trees and others alHed to them,
of which there were many kinds, may be Hkened to gigantic
club mosses, which they resembled in fruit and foliage, though
vastly more complex in structure of stem and branch. Some
of them, perhaps, were of much higher rank than any of the
modern plants most nearly allied to them. One of their most
remarkable features was that of their roots — those Stigmarise,
to which so frequent reference has been made. They differed
from modern roots, not only in some points of structure, but
in their regular bifurcation, and in having huge root fibres
articulated to the roots, and arranged in a regular spiral
manner, like leaves. They radiate regularly from a single stem,
and do not seem to have sent up buds or secondary stems.
They thus differed from the botanical definition of a root, and
also from that of a rhizoma, or root stock ; being, in short, a
primitive and generalized contrivance, suited to trees them-
selves primitive and generalized, and to special and peculiar
circumstances of growth. Some botanists have imagined that
they were aquatic plants, growing at the bottom of lakes, but
their mode of occurrence negatives this. I have elsewhere
stated this as follows : — ^
" It is quite certain that Stigmariai are not ' rhizomes which
floated in water, or spread themselves out on the surface of
mud.' Whether rhizomes or not, they grew in the soil, or in
the upper layers of peaty deposits since changed into coal.
The late Richard Brown and the writer have shown that they
grew in the underclays or fossil soils, and that their rootlets
radiated in these soils in all directions." In one of my papers
I have figured a Stigmarian root penetrating through an erect
Sigilla?-ia, and Logan, in his Report of 1845, had already
' Natural Science, May, 1S92.
'' Quart. Jourii. Geol. Soc, vol. ii. p. 394 (1846) ; //'/,, vol. iv. p. 47
(1847) ; Ilnd., vol. v. p. 355 (1849); Ibid., vol. v. pp. 23, 30.
THE GROWTH OF COAL 247
figured a similar example. The penetration of decaying stems
by the rootlets of Stiginaria is a fact well known to all who
have studied slices of Carboniferous plants/ while Stigmari^
are often found creeping inside the bark of erect and prostrate
trunks. Besides this, as I have shown in ' Acadian Geology,'
in the section of 5,000 feet of coal measures at the South
Joggins (including eighty-one distinct coal groups, and a larger
number of soils with Stigmaria, or erect trees), Sigillaria and
Stigmaria occur together, and the latter nearly always either
in argillaceous soils, or sands hardened into ' Gannister,' which
are often filled with roots or rootlets, or on the surfaces of
coal beds. On the other hand, the numerous bituminous
limestones, and calcareous and other shales holding remains
of fishes, crustaceans, and bivalve shells do not contain
Stigmaria in situ — the only exceptions being two beds of bitu-
minous limestone, the upper parts of which have been converted
into underclays. This section, and that of North Sydney — two
of the most complete and instructive in the world — have
afforded conclusive proof of this mode of growth of Sigillaria
and Stigmaria.
" The objection to calling the Stigmariae roots and their
processes rootlets, appears to me a finical application of modern
botanical usages to times for which they do not hold. We
might equally object to the application of the term roots to
those which spring from the earthed- up stems of Calamites,
radiating as they do from nodes which, in the air, would pro-
duce branchlets. Grand' Eury's figures show abundant in-
stances of this. We might also object to the exogenous stems
described by Williamson, which belong to cryptogamous
plants ; and, unlike anything modern, are made up exclusively
of scalariform tissue. If the articulation and regular arrange-
ment of those gigantic root hairs, the rootlets, or ' leaves ' of
' Williamson has noticed this in his excellent Memoirs in the Phil.
Trans.
248 THE GROWTH OF COAL
Siig/iiaria, are to be regarded as depriving them of the name
which clearly describes their function, we may call them under-
ground branches, though, by so doing, we set at nought both
their function and their mode of growth."
Dr. Williamson, in a recent paper, expresses the same view
in the following terms ^ : — " At that period (the Carboniferous
age) no Angiosperms existed on the earth, and even the
Gymnosperms were very far from reaching their modern
development. Under these circumstances the Cryptogams
chiefly became the giant forest trees of that remote age. To
become such, they required an organization very different
in some respects from that of their degraded living representa-
tives. Hence we must not appeal to these degenerate types
for illustrations and explanations of structures no longer
existing. Still less must we turn to what we find in the
Angiosperms, that wholly distinct race which has taken the
place of the primceval Cryptogams in our woods. The primaeval
giants of the swampy forests had doubtless a morphology
assigned to them, adapted to the physical conditions by which
they were surrounded ; but if even their dwarfed and other-
w^'se modified descendants fail to throw light upon morphologi-
cal details once so common, still less must we expect to obtain
that light from the living and wholly different flowering
plants."
With the remarkable trees above referred to, there co-existed
a vast multitude of ferns, some arborescent, others herbaceous,
tall, reed-like plants, the Calamitcs, allied to modern Marcs'-
tails, a very remarkable family of plants allied to modern
Cycads and Pines ; the Cordaites, which seem to have grown
plentifully in certain parts of the coal areas — probably the
drier parts, so that their remains sometimes constitute the
greater part of small seams of coal. There were also true pine-
like trees, though these would seem to have grown most abun-
' Niitu7-al Scieine, July, 1892.
THE GROWTH OF COAL 249
dantly on the higher levels. Nor was strictly aquatic vegetation
wanting. We find, both in the preceding Devonian and the
Carboniferous, that the little aquatic plants now known as
Rhizocarps, and structurally allied to the Ferns — such plants
as the floating Salvinia, and the Pillworts of our swamps, were
vastly abundant, and they may have filled and choked up with
their exuberant growth many of the lakes and slow streams of
the period, furnishing layers of cannel and " macrospore "
coal, and earthly bitumen or Torbanite.
We have hitherto confined our attention to the great Car-
boniferous period, so called, as emphatically the age of coal ;
but this mineral, and allied forms of carbon, were produced
both before and after. Even in that old Laurentian age,
which includes the oldest rocks that we know, formed when
the first land had just risen out of the waters, there are thick
beds of graphite, or plumbago, chemically the same with
anthracite coal, and which must have been produced by the
agency of plants, whether terrestrial or aquatic. We may sup-
pose that the plants of this remote age were of very humble
type as much lower than those of the coal formation as these
are lower than those of the present day ; but if so, then, on the
analogy of the Carboniferous, they would be high and complex
representatives of those low types. But there is another and
more startling possibility ; that the Laurentian may have been
a period when vegetable life culminated on the earth, and
existed in its most complete and grandest forms in advance of
the time when it was brought into subordination to the higher
life of the animal. In the meantime, the Laurentian rocks are
in a state of so extreme metamorphism that they have afforded
no certain indication of the forms or structures of the vegeta-
tion of the period.
We find indications of plant life through all the Palaeozoic
groups succeeding the Laurentian ; but it is not till we reach
the Devonian, the system immediately preceding the Carboni-
250 THE GROWTH OF COAL
ferous, that we find an abundance of forms not essentially
different from those of the Carboniferous, though similar in
details. Only a few and very small beds of coal were accumu-
lated in this age ; but there was an immense abundance of
bituminous shale enriched with the macrospores of Rhizocarps.
The Ohio black shale, which is said to extend its outcrop
across that state with a breadth of ten to twenty miles, and a
thickness of 550 feet, is filled with macrospores of Protosalvinia,
as is its continuation in Canada.
Above the great coal formation the Permian and Jurassic
contain beds of coal, though of limited extent, and formed in
the case of the two latter of very different plants from those of
the Carboniferous. In the Cretaceous and Tertiary ages,
after the abundant introduction of species of forest trees still
living, coal making seems to have obtained a new impulse, so
that in China and the western part of America there are coals
of great extent and value, all made of plants ot genera still
existing. In the Cretaceous coal of Vancouver Island there
are remains of such modern trees as the Poplars, Magnolias,
Palmettos, Sequoias, and a great variety of other genera still
living in America. Out of the remains of these, under favour-
ing conditions, quite as good coal as that of the coal formation
has been made, although the plants are so different. There
is, indeed, reason to believe that those now rare trees, the
Sequoias, represented at the present time only by the big trees
of California, and their companion, the redwood, were then
spread universally over the northern hemisphere, and formed
dense forests on swampy flats which led to the accumulation of
coal beds in which the trunks and leaves of the Sequoias
formed main ingredients, so that Sequoia and its allies in this
later age take the place of the Sigillarias of the coal formation.
Last of all, coal accumulation is still going on in the Ever-
glades of Florida, the dismal swamp of Virginia, and the peat-
bogs of the more northern regions. So the vegetable kingdom
THE GROWTH OF COAL 25 I
has, throughout its long history, been continually depriving the
atmosphere of its carbon dioxide, and accumulating this in
beds of coal. In the earlier ages indeed, this would seem to
us to have been its main use.
To the modern naturalist, vegetable life, with regard to its
uses, is the great accumulator of pabulum for the sustenance
of the higher forms of vital energy manifested in the animal.
In the Paleozoic this consideration sinks in importance. In
the Coal period we know few land animals, and these not vege-
table feeders, with the exception of some insects, millipedes,
and snails. But the Carboniferous forests did not live in vain,
if their only use was to store up the light and heat of those
old summers in the form of coal, and to remove the excess of
carbonic acid from the atmosphere. In the Devonian period
even these utilities fail, for coal does not seem to have been
accumulated to any great extent, though the abundant petro-
leum of the Devonian is, no doubt, due to the agency of aquatic
vegetation. In addition to scorpions, a few insects are the
only known tenants of the Devonian land, and these are of
kinds whose larvc'e probably lived in water, and were not
dependent on land plants. We may have much yet to learn
of the animal life of the Devonian ; but for the present, the
great plan of vegetable nature goes beyond our measures of
utility; and there remains only what is perhaps the most
wonderful and suggestive correlation of all, namely, that our
minds are able to trace in these perished organisms structures
similar to those of modern plants, and thus to reproduce in
imagination the forms and habits of growth of living things
which so long preceded us on the earth.
In another way Huxley has put the utilitarian aspect of the
case so admirably, that I cannot refrain from quoting his clever
apotheosis of nature in connection with the production of coal.
"Nature is never in a hurry, and seems to have had always
before her eyes the adage, ' Keep a thing long enough, and
252 THE GROWTH OF COAL
you Avill find a use for it.' She has kept her beds of coal for
miUions of years without being able to find a use for them ;
she has sent them beneath the sea, and the sea beasts could
make nothing of them ; she had raised them up into dry land,
and laid the black veins bare, and still for ages and ages there
was no living thing on the face of the earth that could see any
sort of value in them ; and it was only the other day, so to
speak, that she turned a new creature out of her workshop,
who, by degrees, acquired sufficient wits to make a fire, and
then to discover that the black rock would burn.
" I suppose that nineteen hundred years ago, when Julius
Caesar was good enough to deal with Britain as we have dealt
with New Zealand, the primaeval Briton, blue with cold and
woad, may have known that the strange black stone which he
found here and there in his wanderings would burn, and so
help to warm his body and cook his food. Saxon, Dane, and
Norman swarmed into the land. The English people grew
into a powerful nation ; and Nature still waited for a return
for the capital she had invested in ancient club mosses. The
eighteenth century arrived, and with it James Watt. The
brain of that man was the spore out of which was developed
the steam engine, and all the prodigious trees and branches
of modern industry which have grown out of this. But coal
is as much an essential of this growth and development as
carbonic acid is of a club moss. Wanting the coal, we could
not have smelted the iron needed to make our engines ; nor
have worked our engines when we got them. But take away
the engines, and the great towns of Yorkshire and Lancashire
vanish like a dream. Manufactures give place to agriculture
and pasture, and not ten men could live where now ten thou-
sand are amply supported.
" Thus all this abundant wealth of money and of vivid life
is Nature's investment in club mosses and the like so long
ago. But what becomes of the coal which is burnt in yielding
THE GROWTH OF COAL 253
the interest ? Heat conies out of it, light comes out of it, and
if we could gather together all that goes up the chimney, and
all that remains in the grate of a thoroughly burnt coal fire,
we should find ourselves in possession of a quantity of carbonic
acid, water, ammonia, and mineral matters exactly equal in
weight to the coal. But these are the very matters with which
Nature supplied the club mosses which made coal. She is
paid back principal and interest at the same time ; and she
straightway invests the carbonic acid, the water, and the
ammonia in new forms of life, feeding with them the plants
that now live. Thrifty Nature, surely ! no prodigal, but the
most notable of housekeepers." ^
All this is true and well told ; but who is " Nature," this
goddess who, since the far-distant Carboniferous age, has
been planning for man ? Is this not another name for that
Almighty Maker who foresaw and arranged all things for His
people " before the foundation of the world."
References : — On Structures in Coal, Journal Geological Society of
Lojtdon, XV., 1853. Contains results of microscopic study of Nova
Scotia coals. Conditions of Accumulation of Coal, Ibid., xxii.,
1866. Contains South Joggins section. Spore cases in Coal, Am.
/'ournal of Science, 3rd series, vol. I, 1871. Rhizocarps in the
Devonian, Bulletin Chicago Academy, vol. i, 1886. "Acadian
Geology and Supplement," 3rd edition, 1891, Cumberland Coal Field.
"Geological History of Plants," chap, iv., London and New York,
2nd edition, 1892.
' Contemporary Review, 187 1.
S. E. 18
THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS.
DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF
MY FRIEND AND EARLY PATRON AND GUIDE
SIR CHARLES LYELL,
To WHOM WE ARE INDEBTED FOR SO MUCH
OF THE Scientific Basis of Modern Geology.
Earliest Discoveries — Footprints of Batrachians —
Labyrinthodents of the Carboniferous — Micro-
sauria of the Carboniferous — Other Types — Dis-
coveries IN Erect Trees — Invertebrate Air-
breathers, Land Snails, Millipedes, Insects, Spiders
and Scorpions — General Conclusions
- OK HvL'jNi'M' - . ..:";.
Photograph of Type specimen somewhat enlarfjetl, Geol. JSfa^aziru, 1891 (p. 279).
(i) Cranial bones and mandibles; {la) Sternal and shoulder bones; (2) Mandible ;
(3) Humerus, ribs and vertebne ; {4) Hind limb ; (5) Pehns ; (6) Caudal vertebne.
CHAPTER X.
THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS.
ANIMAL life had its beginning in the waters, and to
this day the waters are the chief habitat of animals,
especially of the lower forms. If we divide the animal kingdom
into great leading types, the lowest of these groups, the
Protozoa, includes only aquatic forms ; the next, that of the
coral animals and their allies, is also aquatic. So are all the
species of the Sea Urchins and Star Fishes. Of the remaining
groups, the Mollusks, the Crustaceans, and the Worms are
dominantly aquatic, only a small proportion being air-breathers.
It is only in the two remaining groups, including the Insects
and Spiders on the one hand, and the Vertebrate animals on
the other, that we have terrestrial species in large proportion.
The same fact appears in geological time. The periods
represented by the older Palaeozoic rocks have been termed
ages of invertebrates, and they might also be termed ages
of aquatic animals. It is only gradually, and as it were with
difficulty, that animals living in the less congenial element of
air are introduced — at first a few scorpions and insects, later,
land snails and amphibian reptiles, later still, the higher rep-
tiles and the birds, and last of all the higher mammalia.
We need not wonder at this, for the conditions of life with
reference to support, locomotion, and vicissitudes of temper-
ature are more complex and difficult in air, and require more
complicated and perfect machinery for their maintenance.
Thus it was that probably half of the whole historj- of our
258 THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS
earth had passed away before the land became the abode
of any large number and variety of animals ; while it was only
about the same time that the development of the vegetable
kingdom became so complete as to afford food and shelter
for air-breathers.
It is also worthy of note that it is only in comparatively
recent times that we have been able to discover the oldest
air-breathing animals, and geologists long believed that the
time when animals had existed on the land was even shorter
than it had actually been. This arose in part from the in-
frequency and rarity of preservation of the remains of the
earliest creatures of this kind, and perhaps partly from the
fact that collectors were not looking for them.
That there was dry land, even in the Cambro-Silurian
period, we know, and can even trace its former shores. In
Canada our old Laurentian coast extends for more than a
thousand miles, from Labrador to Lake Superior, marking the
southern border of the nucleus of the American continent in
the Cambrian and Cambro-Silurian periods. Along a great
part of this ancient coast we have the sand flats of the Potsdam
Sandstone, affording very favourable conditions for the im-
bedding of land animals, did these exist ; still, notwithstanding
the zealous explorations of the Geological Survey, and of many
amateurs, no trace of an air-breather has been found. I have
myself followed the oldest Palneozoic beds up to their ancient
limits in some localities, and collected the shells which the
waves had dashed on the beach, and have seen under the
Cambro-Silurian beds the old pre-Cambrian rocks pitted and
indented with weather marks, showing that this shore was then
gradually subsiding; yet the record of the rocks was totally
silent as to the animals that may have trod the shore, or the
trees that may have waved over it. All that can be said is
that the sun shone, the rain fell, and the wind blew as it does
now, and that the sea abounded in living creatures. The eyes
THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 259
of Trilobites, the weathered Laurentian rocks, the wind ripples
in the Potsdam sandstone, the rich fossils of the limestones,
testify to these things. The existence of such conditions
would lead us to hope that land animals may yet be found in
these older formations. On the other hand, the gradual failure
of one form of life after another, as we descend in the geo-
logical series, and the rarity of fishes and land plants in the
Silurian rocks and their absence from the Cambrian, might
induce us to believe that we have here reached the beginning
of animal life, and have left far behind us those forms that
inhabit the land.
Even in the Carboniferous period, though land plants
abound, air-breathers are not numerous, and most of them
have only been recently recognised. We know, however,
with certainty that the dark and luxuriant forests of the coal
period were not destitute of animal life. Reptiles ^ crept
under their shade, land snails and millipedes fed on the
rank leaves and decaying vegetable matter, and insects flitted
through the air of the sunnier spots. Great interest attaches
to these creatures ; perhaps the first-born species in some of
their respective types, and certainly belonging to one of the
oldest land faunas, and presenting prototypes of future forms
equally interesting to the geologist and the zoologist.
It has happened to the writer of these pages to have had
some share in the finding of several of these ancient animals.
The coal formation of Nova Scotia, so full in its development,
so rich in fossil remains, and so well exposed in coast cliffs,
has afforded admirable opportunities for such discoveries,
which have been so far improved that at least twenty-five out
of the not very large number of known Carboniferous land
animals have been obtained from it. - The descriptions of
' I shall use the term reptile here in its broad, popular sense, as including
Batrachians as well as reptiles proper.
- It appears that about a hundred species of Carboniferous reptiles
26o THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS
these creatures, found at various times and at various places,
are scattered through papers ranging in date from 1844 to
1891,^ and are too fragmentary to give complete information
respecting the structures of the animals, and their conditions
of existence.
Footprints.
It has often happened to geologists, as to other explorers of
new regions, that footprints on the sand have guided them to
the inhabitants of unknown lands, and such footprints, pro-
verbially perishable, may be so preserved by being filled up
with matter deposited in them as to endure for ever. This we
may see to-day in the tracks of sandpipers and marks of rain-
drops preserved in the layers of alluvial mud deposited by the
tides of the Bay of Fundy, and which, if baked or hardened
by pressure, might become imperishable, like the inscriptions
of the old Chaldeans on their tablets of baked clay. The
first trace ever observed of reptiles in the Carboniferous
system consisted of a series of small but well-marked foot-
prints found by Sir W. E. Logan, in 1841, in the lower coal
measures of Horton Bluff, in Nova Scotia ; and as the authors
of most of our general works on geology have hitherto, in so
far as I am aware, failed to do justice to this discovery, I shall
notice it here in detail. In the year above mentioned, Sir
William, then Mr. Logan, examined the coal fields of Penn-
sylvania and Nova Scotia, with the view of stud\ing their
structure, and extending the application of the discoveries as
to beds with roots, or Stigmaria underclays, which he had made
have been recognised on the conthient of l^urope, in (Ireat Britain, and in
the United States. They belong to a number of distinct types, all, however,
being of batrachian aflhiities.
^ Papers by Lyell, Owen, and the author, in the Journal of the Geolo-
gical Society of London, i. ii. i.x. x. xi. xvi. xvii. xviii. ; "Acadian Geology,"
by the author ; Papers in I'rans. Royal Society of London, Am. Jl. of
Science, and Geological Magazine.
Fuotpiinls ol Hylopns Lc^aiii, Dawson, Lower Carboniferous,
Nova Scotia.
Natural size and reduced.
These footprints were tlie first indications of Carboniferous land ^■erte-
brates ever observed; they were probably made by a Microsaurian anei one
of the earliest species of this type. They show a remarkable length of
stride and development of limb.
THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 261
in the Welsh coal fields. On his return to England he read
a paper on these subjects before the Geological Society of
London, in which he noticed the subject of reptilian footprints
at Horton Bluff. The specimen was exhibited at the meeting
of the Society, and was, I believe, admitted, on the high
authority of Prof. Owen, to be probably reptilian. Unfortu-
nately Sir William's paper appeared only in abstract in the
Transactions ; and in this abstract, though the footprints are
mentioned, no opinion is expressed as to their nature. Sir
William's own opinion is thus stated in a letter to me, dated
June, 1843, when he was on his way to Canada, to commence
the survey which has since developed so astonishing a mass
of geological facts.
" Am.ong the specimens which I carried from Horton Bluff,
one is of very high interest. It exhibits the footprints of some
reptilian animal. Owen has no doubt of the marks being
genuine footprints. The rocks of Horton Bluff are below the
gypsum of that neighbourhood ; so that the specimen in ques-
tion (if Lyell's views are correct^) comes from the very bottom
of the coal series, or at any rate very low down in it, and
demonstrates the existence of reptiles at an earlier epoch than
has hitherto been determined ; none having been previously
found below the magnesian limestone, or, to give it IMurchison's
new name, the ' Permian era.' "
This extract is of interest, not merely as an item of evidence
in relation to the matter now in hand, but as a mark in the
progress of geological investigation. For the reasons above
stated, the important discovery thus made in 1841, and pub-
lished in 1842, was overlooked; and the discovery of reptilian
bones by Von Dechen, at Saarbruck, in 1844, and that of
footprints by Dr. King in the same year, in Pennsylvania,
^ Sir Charles Lyell had then just read a paper announcing his discovery
that the gypsiferous system of Nova Scotia is Lower Carboniferous, in
which he mentions the footprints referred to, as being reptilian.
262 THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS
have been uniformly referred to as the first observations of
this kind. Insects and Arachnidans, it may be observed, had
previously been discovered in the coal formation in Europe.
The original specimen of these footprints is still in the
collection of the Geological Survey of Canada, and a cast
which Logan kindly presented to me is exhibited in the Peter
Redpath Museum of McGill University. It is a slab of dark-
coloured sandstone, glazed with fine clay on the surface ; and
having a series of seven footprints in two rows, distant about
three inches ; the distance of the impressions in each row being
three or four inches, and the individual impressions about one
inch in length. They seem to have been made by the points
of the toes, which must have been armed with strong and
apparently blunt claws, and appear as if either the surface had
been somewhat firm, or the body of the animal had been
partly water-borne. In one place only is there a distinct mark
of the whole foot, as if the animal had exerted an unusual
pressure in turning or stopping suddenly. One pair of feet—
the fore feet, I presume — appear to have had four toes touching
the ground ; the other pair show only three or four, and it is
to be observed that the outer toe, as in the larger footprints
discovered by Dr. King, projects in the manner of a thumb,
as in the cheirotherian tracks of the Trias. At a later date
another series of footprints, possibly of the same animal, was
obtained at the same place by Prof. Elder, and is now in the
Peter Redpath Museum. Each foot in this shows five toes,
and it is remarkable that the animal was digitigrade and took
a long step for its size, indicating a somewhat high grade
of quadrupedal organization. No mark of the tail or belly
appears. The impressions are such as may have been made
by animals similar to some of those to be described in the
sequel.
Shortly afterward. Dr. Harding, of Windsor, when examining
a cargo of sandstone which had been landed at that place from
THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 263
Parrsboro', found on one of the slabs a very distinct series of
footprints, each with four toes, and a trace of the fifth. Dr.
Harding's specimen is now in the museum of King's College,
Windsor. Its impressions are more distinct, but not very
different otherwise from those above described, as found at
Horton Bluff. The rocks at that place are probably of nearly
the same age with those of Parrsboro'. I afterward examined
the place from which this slab had been quarried, and satisfied
myself that the beds are Carboniferous, and probably Lower
Carboniferous. They were ripple-marked and sun-cracked,
and I thought I could detect some footprints, though more
obscure than those in Dr. Harding's slab. Similar footprints
are also stated to have been found by Dr. Gesner, at Parrs-
boro'. All of these were from the lowest beds of the Carboni-
ferous system.
I have since observed several instances of such impressions
at the Joggins, at Horton, and near Windsor, showing that
they are by no means rare, and that reptilian animals existed
in no inconsiderable numbers throughout the coal field of
Nova Scotia, and from the beginning to the end of the Carbo-
niferous period. Most of these, when well preserved, shew five
toes both on the anterior and posterior limb. On comparing
these earlier Carboniferous footprints with one another, it will
be observed that they are of similar general character, and
may have been made by one kind of animal, which must have
had the fore and hind feet nearly of equal size, and a digiti-
grade mode of walking. Footprints of similar form are found
in the coal formation, as well as others of much larger size.
The latter are of two kinds. One of these shows short hind
feet of digitigrade character and a long stride, in this resem-
bling the smaller footprints of the Lower Carboniferous, which
are remarkable for the length of limb which they indicate by
the distance between the footprints. The other kind shows
long hind feet, as if the whole heel were brought down to the
264 THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS
ground in a plantigrade manner. These have also the outer
toe separated from the others, and sometimes provided with
a long claw. The fore foot is sometimes smaller than the
hind foot, and differently formed.^ In these respects they
resemble the great Labyrinthodont Batrachians of the sub-
sequent Trias. Their stride also is comparatively short, and
the rows of impressions wide apart, as if the body of the
animal had been broad, and its limbs short.
We have thus two types of quadrupedal footprints, to the
first of which I have given the name Hylopus, and have
restricted the term Sauropus,^ to the second. The first
apparently belongs to the usually small reptiles of the group
Microsauriii^ which had a well-marked lizard-like form, with
well-developed limbs, and perhaps also to some of the smaller
Labyrinthodonts, the second to the group of Labyrinthodontia^
which were often of large size and with stout and short limbs
and plantigrade hind feet. There are also some small and
uncertain tracks, which may have been made by newt-like
animals with short feet, and a singular trail of large size, and
with a row of impressions at each side (Diplichnites),-' which,
if made by a vertebrate animal, would seem to indicate that
serpentiform shape which we know belonged to some Carbo-
niferous Batrachians.
The bones of these animals, however, hitherto found in
Nova Scotia, may all have belonged to the two groups first
named, the Labyrinthodontia and Microsauria, and I shall
proceed to give some examples of each of these.
In leaving the footprints, I may merely mention that the
animals which produced them may, in certain circumstances,
have left distinct impressions only of three or four toes,
' Fine slabs of these footprints have been presented by ^h\ Sandford
Fleming to the Geological Survey of Canada,
^ Given by King.
^ Impressions and Footprints of Animals, Am. Jour. Set., 1873.
THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 265
when they actually possessed five, while in other circumstances
all may have left marks ; and that, when wading in deep mud,
their footprints were altogether different from those made on
hard sand or clay. In some instances the impressions may
have been made by animals wading or swimming in water,
while in others the rain marks and sun cracks afford evidence
that the surface was a subaerial one. They are chiefly inter-
esting as indicating the wide diffusion and abundance of the
creatures producing them, and that they haunted tidal flats
and muddy shores, perhaps emerging from the water that they
might bask in the sun, or possibly searching for food among
the rejectamenta of the sea, or of lagunes and estuaries.
The Labyrinthodonts of the Coal Period, Baphetes
Planiceps and Dendrerpeton Acadianum.
In the summer of 185 1 I had occasion to spend a day
at the Albion Mines in the eastern part of Nova Scotia, and
on arriving at the railway station in the afternoon, found my-
self somewhat too early for the train. By way of improving
the time thus left on my hands, I betook myself to the ex-
amination of a large pile of rubbish, consisting of shale and
ironstone from one of the pits, and in which I had previously
found scales and teeth of fishes. In the blocks of hard car-
bonaceous shale and earthy coal, of which the pile chiefly
consisted, scales, teeth and coprolites often appeared on the
weathered ends and surfaces as whitish spots. In looking
for these, I observed one of much greater size than usual on
the edge of a block, and on splitting it open, found a large
flattened skull, about six inches broad, the cranial bones of
which remained entire on one side of the mass, while the palate
and teeth, in several fragments, came away with the other half.
Carefully trimming the larger specimen, and gathering all the
smaller fragments, I packed them up as safely as possible, and
s, E. 19
266 THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS
returned from my little excursion much richer than I had
hoped.
The specimen, on further examination, proved somewhat
puzzling. I supposed it to be, most probably, the head of a
large ganoid fish ; but it seemed different from anything of
this kind with which I could compare it ; and at a distance
from comparative anatomists, and without sufficient means of
determination, I dared not refer it to anything higher in the
animal scale. Hoping for further light, I packed it up with
some other specimens, and sent it to the Secretary of the
Geological Society of London, with an explanatory note as to
its geological position, and requesting that it might be sub-
mitted to some one versed in such fossils. For a year or
two, however, it remained as quietly in the Society's collection
as if in its original bed in the coal mine, until attention
having been attracted to such remains by the discoveries
made by Sir Charles Lyell and myself in 1852, at the South
Joggins, and published in 1853,1 the Secretary or President of
the Society re-discovered the specimen, and handed it to Sir
Richard Owen, by whom it was described in December, 1853,2
under the name of Baphetes pla?iiceps, which may be inter-
preted the "flat-headed diving animal," in allusion to the
flatness of the creature's skull, and the possibility that it may
have been in the habit of diving.
The parts preserved in my specimen are the bones of the
anterior and upper part of the skull in one fragment, and
the teeth and palatal bones in others. These parts were
carefully examined and described by Owen, and the details
will be found in his papers referred to in the note. We
may merely observe here that the form and arrangement of
the bones showed batrachian affinities, that the surface of the
cranium was sculptured in the maimer of the group of
* Jottrnal of Geological Society of London, vol. ix.
^ Journal of Geological Society, vol. x. ; and additional notes, vol. xi.
THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 26/
Labyrinthodonts, and that the teeth possessed the pecuHar
and compUcated pUcation of the ivory and enamel seen in
creatures of this type. The whole of these characters are
regarded as allying the animal with the great crocodilian frogs
of the Trias of Europe, first known as Cheirotherians, owing
to the remarkable hand-like impressions of their feet, and
afterwards as Labyrinthodotits, from the beautifully complicated
convolutions of the ivory of their teeth.
Unfortunately the original specimen exhibited only the
head, and after much and frequent subsequent searching, the
only other bones found are a scapula, or shoulder bone, and
one of the surface scales which served for protection, and
which indicate at least that the creature possessed walking
limbs and was armed with bony scales sculptured in the
same manner with the skull bones.
Of the general form and dimensions of Bap/ietes, the facts
at present known do not enable us to say much. Its
formidable teeth and strong maxillary bones show that it must
have devoured animals of considerable size, probably the
fishes whose remains are found with it, or the smaller reptiles
of the coal. It must, in short, have been crocodilian, rather
than frog-like, in its mode of life ; but whether, like the
Labyrinthodonts, it had strong limbs and a short body, or
like the crocodiles, an elongated form and a powerful
natatory tail, the remains do not decide. One of the limbs
or a vertebra of the tail would settle this question, but neither
has as yet been found. That there were large animals of
the labyrinthodontal form in the coal period is proved by
the footprints discovered by Dr. King in Pennsylvania, which
may have been produced by an animal of the type of Baphetes,
as well as by those of Sauropus unguifer from the Carboni-
ferous of Nova Scotia, and which would very well suit an
animal of this size and probable form. On the other hand,
that there were large swimming reptiles seems established
268 THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS
by the discovery of the vertebrse of Eosaurus Acadia/ius, at
the Joggins, by Marsh. ^ The locomotion of Baphetes must
have been vigorous and rapid, but it may have been effected
both on land and in water, and either by feet or tail, or Ijoth.
A jawbone found at the Joggins in Nova Scotia, and to
which I have attached the name Baphetes minor, may have
belonged to a second species. Great Batrachians allied to
Baphetes, but different specifically or generically, have since
been found in the coal formations of Great Britain, the conti-
nent of Europe and the United States.
With the nature of the habitat of this formidable creature
we are better acquainted. The area of the iMbion Mines coal
field was somewhat exceptional in its character. It seems to
have been a bay or indentation in the Silurian land, separated
from the remainder of the coal field by a high shingle beach,
now a bed of conglomerate. Owing to this circumstance,
while in the other portions of the Nova Scotia coal field the
beds of coal arc thin, and alternate with sandstones and shales,
at the Albion Mines a vast thickness of almost unmixed vege-
table matter has been de[)osited, constituting the " main seam "
of thirty-eight feet thick, and the " deep seam," twenty-four feet
thick, as well as still thicker beds of highly carbonaceous
shale. But, though the area of the Albion coal measures was
thus separated, and preserved from marine incursions, it must
have been often submerged, and probably had connection
with the sea, through rivers or channels cutting the enclosing
beach. Hence beds of earthy matter occur in it, containing
remains of large fishes. One of the most important of these
is that known as the "Holing stone," a band of black highly
carbonaceous shale, coaly matter, and clay ironstone, occur-
ring in the main seam, about five feet below its roof, and vary-
ing in thickness from two inches to nearly two feet. It was
from this band that the rubbish heap in which I found the
* Silliman^sjourftal, 1859.
THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 269
skull of Baphetes planiceps was derived. It is a laminated bed,
sometimes hard and containing much ironstone, in other
places soft and shaly, but always black and carbonaceous,
and often with layers of coarse coal, though with few fossil
plants retaining their forms. It contains large round flat
scales and flattened curved teeth, which I attribute to a fish of
the genus Rhizodus, resembling, if not identical with, R.
hi/icifer, Newberry. AVith these are double-pointed shark-like
teeth, and long cylindrical spines of a species of Dip/odus,
which I have named D. achiaces} There are also shells of
the minute Spirorbis, so common in the coal measures of
other parts of Nova Scotia, and abundance of fragments of
coprolitic matter, or fossil excrement, sometimes containing
bones and scales of fishes.
It is evident that the " Holing stone " indicates one ot
those periods in which the Albion coal area, or a large part of
it, was under water, probably fresh or brackish, as there are no
properly marine shells in this, or any of the other beds of this
coal series. We may then imagine a large lake or lagune,
loaded with trunks of trees and decaying vegetable matter,
having in its shallow parts, and along its sides, dense brakes of
Calamites, and forests of Sigil/aria, Lepidodeiidro/i, and other
trees of the period, extending far on every side as damp pesti-
lential swamps. In such a habitat, uninviting to us, but no
doubt suited to Baphetes, that creature crawled through
swamps and thickets, wallowed in flats of black mud, or swam
and dived in search of its finny prey. It was, in so far as we
know, the monarch of these swamps, though there is, as
already stated, evidence of the existence of similar creatures of
this type quite as large in other parts of the Nova Scotia coal
field. We must now notice a smaller animal belonging to the
same family of Labyrinthodonts.
1 "Supplement to .\cadian Geology," ]ip. 43 and 50. These fishes are
now known under the generic name Leplacanthus.
2/0 THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS
The geology of Nova Scotia is largely indebted to the world-
embracing labours of Sir Charles Lyell. Though much had
previously been done by others, his personal explorations in
1842, and his paper on the gypsiferous formation, published in
the following year, first gave form and shape to some of the
more difficult features of the geology of the country, and
brought it into relation with that of other parts of the world.
In geological investigation, as in many other things, patient
plodding may accumulate large stores of fact, but the magic
wand of genius is required to bring out the true value and
significance of these stores of knowledge. It is scarcely too
much to say that the exploration of a few weeks, and subse-
quent study of the subject by Sir Charles, with the impulse
and guidance given to the labours of others, did as much for
Nova Scotia as might have been effected by years of laborious
work under less competent heads.
Sir Charles naturally continued to take an interest in the
geology of Nova Scotia, and to entertain a desire to explore
more fully some of those magnificent coast sections which he
had but hastily examined; and when, in 185 1, he had occa-
sion to revisit the United States, he made an appointment
with the writer of these pages to spend a few days in renewed
explorations of the cliffs of the South Joggins. The object
specially in view was the thorough examination of the beds of
the true coal measures, with reference to their contained
fossils, and the conditions of accumulation of the coal ; and
the results were given to the world in a joint paper on "The
remains of a reptile and a land shell discovered in the interior
of an erect tree in the coal measures of Nova Scotia," and in
the writer's paper on the " Coal Measures of the South
Joggins";^ while other important investigations grew out ot
the following up of these researches, and much matter in
^ Journal of the Geological Socictj' of London, vols, ix, and x, ; and
"Acadian Geology,"
THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 27 1
relation to the vegetable fossils still remains to be worked up.
It is with the more striking fact of the discovery of the remains
of a reptile in the coal measures that we have now to do.
The South Joggins Section is, among other things, remark-
able for the number of beds which contain remains of erect
trees imbedded in situ : these trees are for the most part
Sigillariae, those great-ribbed pillar-like trees which seem to
have been so characteristic of the forests of the coal formation
flats and swamps, and so important contributors to the forma-
tion of coal. They vary in diameter from six inches to five feet.
They have grown on underclays and wet soils, similar to those
on which the coal was accumulated ; and these having been
submerged or buried by mud carried down by inundations,
the trees, killed by the accumulations around their stems,
have decayed, and their tops being broken off at the level of
the mud or sand, the cylindrical cavities left open by the dis-
appearance of the wood, and preserved in their form by the
greater durability of the bark, have been filled with sand and
clay. This, now hardened into stone, constitutes pillar-like
casts of the trees, which may often be seen exposed in the
cliffs, and which, as these waste away, fall upon the beach.
The sandstones enveloping these pillared trunks of the ancient
Sigillariae of the coal, are laminated or bedded, and the
laminae, when exposed, split apart with the weather, so that the
trees themselves become broken across ; this being often
aided by the arrangement of the matter within the trunks, in
layers more or less corresponding to those without. Thus one
of these fossil trees usually falls to the beacli in a series of
discs, somewhat resembling the grindstones which are exten-
sively manufactured on the coast. The surfaces of these
fragments often exhibit remains of plants which have been
washed into the hollow trunks, and have been imbedded
there ; and in our explorations of the shore, we always care-
fully scrutinized such specimens, both with th? view of observ-
2/2 THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS
ing whether they retained the superficial markings of Sigillarise,
and with reference to the fossils contained in them. It was
while examining a pile of these " fossil grindstones " that we
were surprised by finding on one of them what seemed to be
fragments of bone. On careful search other bones appeared,
and they had the aspect, not of remains of fishes, of which
many species are found fossil in these coal measures, but
rather of limb bones of a quadruped. The fallen pieces of the
tree were carefully broken up, and other bones disengaged, and
at length a jaw with teeth made its appearance. We felt quite
confident, from the first, that these bones were reptilian ; and
the whole, being carefully packed and labelled, were taken by
Sir Charles to the United States, and submitted to Prof. J.
Wyman of Cambridge ; who recognised their reptilian char-
acter, and prepared descriptive notes of the principal bones,
which appeared to have belonged to two species. He also
observed among the fragments an object of different character,
apparently a shell ; which was recognised by Dr. Gould of
Boston, and afterward by M. Deshayes, as probably a land-
snail, and has since been named Pupa vetusta.
The specimens were subsequently taken to London and re-
examined by Prof. Owen, who confirmed Wyman's inferences,
added other characters to the description, and named the
larger and better preserved species Dejidrerpeton Acadianiaii,
in allusion to its discovery in the interior of a tree, and to its
native country of Acadia or Nova Scotia. It is necessary to
state in explanation of the fragmentary character of the remains
obtained, that in the decay of the animals imbedded in the
erect trees at the Joggins, their skeletons have become disar-
ticulated, and the portions scattered, either by falling into the
interstices of the vegetable fragments in the bottom of the
hollow trunks, or by the water with which these may have
sometimes been partly filled. A\'e thus usually obtain only
separate bones ; and though all of these are no doubt present
>7*
« v\-"m.'^^
•^^\fl
5 ?''
V-"
z ^
-3
1)
^ u
p
c
o
p*.
^
o
^
S
d
rt
'/i
tn
i)
"*;
o
^
^
•*-'
"
c/)
O
Y.
t)
^
<
rt
o
^
^
^
_o
7.
"jj
<
C
u
tn
£
'w
D
'u
U
U.
O
B
c
in
*^
t/;
r!
3
o
s
J:^
H
ri
THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 273
in each case, it is often impossible in breaking up the hard
matrix to recover more than a portion of them. The original
description by Owen was therefore based on somewhat imperfect
material, but additional specimens subsequently found have
supplemented it in such a manner as to enable us somewhat
completely to restore in imagination the form of the animal,
which, though much smaller than Baphetes, agrees with it in its
sculptured bones, in its bony armature, especially beneath, and
in its plicated teeth.
In form, Detidrerpeton Acadianutn was probably lizard-like ;
with a broad flat head, short stout Umbs and an elongated tailj
and having its skin, and more particularly that of the belly,
protected by small bony plates closely overlapping each other,
and arranged en chevron, in oblique rows meeting on the
mesial line, where in front was a thoracic plate. It may have
attained the length of two feet. The form of the head is not
unlike that of Baphetes, but longer in proportion ; and much
resembles that of the labyrinthodont reptiles of the Trias.
The bones of the skull are sculptured as in Baphefes, but in a
smaller pattern.
The fore limb of the adult animal, including the toes,
must have been four or five inches in length, and is of
massive proportions. The bones were hollow, and in the case
of the phalanges the bony walls were thin, so that they are
often crushed flat. The humerus, or arm bone, however, was
a strong bone, with thick walls and a cancellated structure
toward its extremities ; still even these have sometimes yielded
to the great pressure to which they have been subjected. The
cavity of the interior of the limb bones is usually filled with
calcspar stained with organic matter, but showing no struc-
ture ; and the inner side of the bony wall is smooth without
any indication of cartilaginous matter lining it.
The vertebrce, in the external aspect of their bodies, remind
one of those of fishes, expanding toward the extremities, and
2/4 THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS
being deeply hollowed by conical cavities, which appear even
to meet in the centre. There is, however, a large and flattened
neural spine. The vertebrre are usually much crushed, and it
is almost impossible to disengage them from the stone. The
ribs are long and curved, showing a reptilian style of chest.
The posterior limb seems to have been not larger than the
anterior, perhaps smaller. The tibia, or principal bone of the
fore leg is much flattened at the extremity, as in some Labyrin-
thodonts, and the foot must have been broad, and probably
suited for swimming, or walking on soft mud, or both. That
the hind limb was adapted for walking is shown, not merely
by the form of the bones, but also by that of the pelvis.
The external scales are thin, oblique-rhomboidal or elon-
gated-oval, marked with slight concentric lines, but otherwise
smooth, and having a thickened ridge or margin, in which
they resemble those of Anhegosaiiri/s, and also those of Pholi-
dogaster piscifonnis, described by Huxley from the Edinburgh
coal field, — an animal which indeed apppears in most respects
to have a close affinity with Dendrcrpeton. The microscopic
structure of the scales is quite similar to that of the other
bones, and different from that of the scales of ganoid fishes, the
shape of the cells being batrachian. For other particulars of
its structure reference may be made to the papers named at
the end of the chapter.
With respect to the affinities of the creature, I think it is
obvious that it is most nearly related to the group of Labyrin-
thodonts, and that it has the same singular mixture of batra-
chian and reptilian characters which distinguish these ancient
animals, and which give them the appearance of prototypes of
the reptilian class. A second and smaller species of Den-
drerpeton was subsequently obtained at the Joggins, and others
have been found, more especially by Fritsch, in the Carboni-
ferous and Permian of Europe.
This ancient inhabitant of the coal swamps of Nova Scotia
THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 2/5
was, in short, as we often find to be the case with the earUest
forms of Hfe, the possessor of powers and structures not usu-
ally, in the modern world, combined in a single species. It
was certainly not a fish, yet its bony scales and the form of its
vertebra3, and of its teeth, might, in the absence of other evi-
dence, cause it to be mistaken for one. AVe call it a Batrachian,
yet its dentition, the sculpturing of the bones of its skull,
which were certainly no more external plates than the similar
bones of a crocodile, its ribs, and the structure of its limbs,
remind us of the higher reptiles ; and we do not know that it
ever possessed gills, or passed through a larval or fish-like
condition. Still, in a great many important characters, its
structures are undoubtedly batrachian. It stands, in short, in
the same position with the Lepidodendra and Siginafics under
whose shade it crept, which, though placed by palaeobotanists
in alliance with certain modern groups of plants, manifestly
differed from these in many of their characters, and occupied
a different position in nature. In the coal period the distinc-
tions of physical and vital conditions were not well defined.
Dry land and water, terrestrial and aquatic plants and animal.s,
and lower and higher forms of animal and vegetable life, are
consequently not easily separated from each other. This is
no doubt a state of things characteristic of the earlier stages of
the earth's history, yet not necessarily so ; for there are some
reasons, derived from fossil plants, for believing that in the
preceding Devonian period there was less of this, and conse
quently that there may then have been a higher and more
varied animal life than in the coal period. ^
The dentition of Dendrerpeton shows it to have been car-
nivorous in a high degree. It may have captured fishes and
smaller reptiles, either on land or in water, and very probably
fed on dead carcases as well. If, as seems likely, any of the
* See the author's paper on Devonian plants, Journal of the Geological
Society, vol. xviii. p. 328.
2/6 THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS
footprints referred to previously belong to this animal, it
must have frequented the shores, either in search of garbage,
or on its way to and from the waters. The occurrence of its
remains in the stumps of Sigillaria, with land snails and milli-
pedes, shows also that it crept in the shade of the woods in
search of food ; and in noticing coprolitic matter, in a subse-
quent page, I shall show that remains of excrementitious
substances, probably of this species, contain fragments attri-
butable to smaller reptiles, and other animals of the land.
All the bones of Detidrerpeton hitherto found, as well as
those of the smaller reptilian species hereafter described, have
been obtained from the interior of erect Sigillariae, and all of
these in one of the many beds, which, at the Joggins, contain
such remains. The thick cellular inner bark of Sigillaria was
very perishable ; the slender woody axis was somewhat more
durable ; but near the surface of the stem, in large trunks,
there was a layer of elongated cells, or bast tissue, of consider-
able durability, and the outer bark was exceedingly dense and
indestructible. ^ Hence an erect tree, partly imbedded in
sediment, and subjected to the influence of the weather, be-
came a hollow shell of bark ; in the bottom of which lay the
decaying remains of the woody axis, and shreds of the fibrous
bark. In ordinary circumstances such hollow stems would be
almost immediately filled with silt and sand, deposited in the
numerous inundations and subsidences of the coal swamps.
Where, however, they remained open for a considerable time,
they would constitute a series of pitfalls, into which animals
walking on the surface might be precipitated ; and being prob-
ably often partly covered by remains of prostrate trunks, or
by vegetation growing around their mouths, they would be
places of retreat and abode for land snails and such creatures.
When the surface was again inundated or submerged, all such
' See a paper by the author, on the Structures of Coal, Journal of the
Geological Society, vol. xv. ; also " Supplement to Acadian Geology."
A REPTII.IFEROUS Tree ill sitit. South Joggins, N. Scotia.
This is a sketch of a tree which afforded remains of Dendrerpeton,
Pupae, etc.
THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 2//
animals, with the remains of those which had fallen into the
deeper pits, would be imbedded in the sediment which would
then fill up the holes. These seem to have been the precise
conditions of the bed which has afforded all these remains.
The history of a bed containing reptiliferous erect trees
would thus be somewhat as follows : — ■
A forest or grove of the large-ribbed trees known as Sigil-
laricE, was either submerged by subsidence, or, growing on low
ground, was invaded with the muddy waters of an inundation,
or successive inundations, so that the trunks were buried to
the depth of several feet. The projecting tops having been
removed by subaerial decay, the buried stumps became hollow,
while their hard outer bark remained intact. They thus be-
came hollow cylinders in a vertical position, and open at top.
The surface having then become dry land, covered with vegeta-
tion, was haunted by small quadrupeds and other land animals,
which from time to time fell into the open holes, in some cases
nine feet deep, and could not extricate themselves. On their
death, and the decomposition of their soft parts, their bones
and other hard portions remained in the bottom of the tree
intermixed with any vegetable debris or soil washed in by rain,
and which formed thin layers separating successive animal
deposits from each other. Finally, the area was again sub-
merged or overflowed by water, bearing sand and mud. The
hollow trees were filled to the top, and their animal contents
thus sealed up. At length the material filling the trees was by
pressure and the access of cementing matter hardened into
stone, not infrequently harder than that of the containing beds,
and the whole being tilted to an angle of 20°, and elevated into
land exposed to the action of the tides and waves, these singular
coffins present themselves as stony cylinders projecting from
the cliff or reef, and can be extracted and their contents
studied.
The singular combination of accidents above detailed was,
s. E. 20
278 THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS
of course, of very rare occurrence, and in point of fact we
know only one set of beds at the South Joggins in which such
remains so preserved occur ; nor is there, so far as I am aware,
any other known instance elsewhere. Even in the beds in
question only a portion of the trees, about fifteen in thirty,
have afforded animal remains. We have, however, thus been
enabled to obtain specimens of a number of species which
would probably otherwise have been unknown, being less
likely than others to be preserved in properly aqueous de-
posits. Such discoveries, on the one hand impress us with
the imperfection of the geological record ; on the other, they
show us the singular provisions which have been made in the
course of geological time for preserving the relics of the ancient
world, and which await the industry and skill of collectors to
disclose their hidden treasures.
I may add that I believe all the trees, about thirty in num-
ber, which have become exposed in this bed since its dis-
covery, have been ransacked for such remains ; and that while
the majority have afforded some reward for the labour, some
have been far more rich than others in their contents. It is
also to be observed that owing to the mode of accumulation
of the mass filling the trees, the bones are usually found scat-
tered in every position, and those of different species inter-
mingled ; and that being often much more friable than the
matrix, much labour is required for their development ; while
after all has been done, the result is a congeries of fragments.
A few specimens only have been found, showing skeletons
complete, or nearly so, and I shall endeavour to figure one or
two of these by way of illustration in the present chapter.
The beds on a level with the top of the reptiliferous erect
trees are arenaceous sandstones, with numerous erect Cala-
7nites. I have searched the surfaces of these beds in vain for
bones or footprints of the reptiles which must have traversed
them, and which, but for hollow erect trees, would apparendy
^^^
^.».^- '^■
>'
^T'<.:
A TYi'icAL Carboniferous IMicrosauriax, Hylonomus Lyeni—V.c-
storation showing dermal armour and ornaments. Skeleton restored from
measurements of the bones of the type specimen figured at the beginning
of the chapter.
THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 279
have left no trace of their existence. On a surface of s'milar
character, sixty feet higher, and separated by three coals, with
their accompaniments, and a very thick compact sandstone, I
observed a series of footprints, which may be those of Deudrer-
feton or Hylonomus.
Species of Microsauria. Hylonomus Lyelli.
In the original reptilifcrous tree discovered by Sir C. Lyell
and the writer, at the Joggins, in 1851, there were, beside the
bones of Dendrerpeton Acadianian, some small elongated
vertebrae, evidently of a different species. These were first
detected by Prof. Wyman, in his examination of these speci-
mens, and were figured, but not named, in the original notice
of the specimens. In a subsequent visit to the Joggins I
obtained from another erect stump many additional remains of
these smaller reptiles, and, on careful comparison of the .speci-
mens, was induced to refer them to three species, all appa-
rently generically allied. I proposed for them the generic
name Hylonomus, " forest dweller." They were described in
the Proceedings of the Geological Society for 1859, with illustra-
tions of the teeth and other characteristic parts. ^ The smaller
species first described I named H. ]Vyma>u' ; the next in size,
that to which this article refers, and which was represented by
a larger number of specimens, I adopted as a type of the genus,
and dedicated to Sir Charles Lyell. The third- and largest,
represented only by a few fragments of a single skeleton, was
named H. aciedcntatus. This I had subsequently to remove
to a new genus, Smilerpetoii.
Hylonomus Lyelli was an animal of small size. Its skull is
about an inch in length, and its whole body, including the tail,
could not have been more than six or seven inches long. The
bones appear to have been thin and easily separable ; and even
^Journal of Geological Society, vol. xvi.
28o THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS
when they remain together, are so much crushed as to render
the shape of the skull not easily discernible. They are smooth
on the outer surface to the naked eye ; and under a lens show-
only delicate, uneven striae and minute dots. They are more
dense and hard than those of Dendrerpeton^ and the bone cells
are more elongated in form. The bones of the snout would
seem to have been somewhat elongated and narrow. A speci-
men in my possession shows the parietal and occipital bones,
or the greater part of them, united and retaining their form.
^Ve learn from them that the brain case was rounded, and that
there was a parietal foramen. There would seem also to have
been two occipital condyles, as in modern Batrachians. Several
well-preserved specimens of the maxillary and mandibular
bones have been obtained. They are smooth, or nearly so,
like those of the skull, and are furnished with numerous sharp,
conical teeth, anchylosed to the jaw, in a partial groove
formed by the outer ridge of the bone. In the anterior part of
the lower jaw there is a group of teeth larger than the others.
The total number of teeth in each ramus of the lower jaw was
about forty, and the number in each maxillary bone about
thirty. The teeth are perfectly simple, hollow within, and
with very fine radiating tubes of ivory. The vertebrae have
the bodies cyclindrical or hour-glass shaped, covered with a
thin, hard, bony plate, and having within a cavity of the form
of two cones, attached by the apices. This cavity was com-
pletely surrounded by bone, as it is filled with stained calcspar
in the same manner as the cavities of the limb bones. It was
probably occupied by cartilage. The vertebrae were apparently
bi-concave, and are furnished with upper and lateral processes
similar to those of small lacertian animals. The ribs are long,
curved, and at the proximal end have a shoulder and neck.
They are hollow, with thin hard bony walls. The anterior
limb, judging from the fragments procured, seems to have been
slender, with long toes, four or possibly five in number. The
THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 28 1
posterior limb was longer and stronger, and attached to a
pelvis so large and broad as to give the impression that the
creature enlarged considerably in size toward the posterior ex-
tremity of the body, and that it may have been in the habit of
sitting erect. The thigh bone is large and well formed, with a
distinct head and trochanter, and the lower extremity flattened
and moulded into two articulating surfaces for the tibia and
fibula, the fragments of which show that they were much
shorter. The toes of the hind feet have been seen only in
detached joints. They seem to have been thicker than those
of the fore foot. Detached vertebrae, which seem to be caudal,
have been found, and show that the tail was long and probably
not flattened. The limb bones are usually somewhat cru.shed
and flattened, especially at their articular extremities, and this
seems to have led to the error of supposing that this flattened
form was their normal condition ; there can be no doubt, how-
ever, that it is merely an effect of pressure. The limb bones
present in cross section a wall of dense bone with elongated bone-
cells, surrounding a cavity now filled with brown calcspar, and
originally occupied with cartilage or marrow. I desire to specify
the above points because I believe that most of the creatures
referred by Fritsch, Credner, and other European naturalists
to the Microsauria are of inferior grade to Hylonomus, though
admitted to present points of approximation to the true rep-
tiles. Woodward has recently described the remains of a
Microsaurian from the English coal formation. Nothing is
more remarkable in the skeleton of this creature than the con-
trast between the perfect and beautiful forms of its bones, and
their imperfectly ossified condition, a circumstance which raises
the question whether these specimens may not represent the
young of some reptile of larger size.
The dermal covering of this animal is represented in part by
oval bony scales, which are so constantly associated with its
bones that I can have no doubt that they belonged to it, being,
^Sj the oldest air-breathers
perfsapsw ttte cfedung: of its low^r or abdominal parts. But the
- - , ,:re
^&s^ >tod<«ti Bastescimits aie cfearjectenstKaLBT nabei ami
feisesv One of the specimens ot HrloncwiTS had associated
^ " ■ ■ " '; " -' ^ -" ' ■ ' ':^'k and ca.r-
. .:r.ed and so
pKsarved br the water liliing the hollow tree impregnared
— - ;-----.-- --- - — ;- --,.-:,--i-^ This skm iras coverevi
-, - - -'x under the microscope,
showed the structure ot bom rather than of bone. Besides
these onSrraiT scales there were bonr pcominences. like
rhose ot the homed taig, on the hack and shoulders, and a
- - " ■ n-
Beiades dsese there were in front arsd at the side rows of per»-
t%rrr> or Iappe::s. oil - ■ -jT,
thocgh nowpertectiT :_,_■_ _, :____ _. :_;_____ __:_, :._- :.ie
Tsse of the ornsece covering,, and perhaps the questioo raises
. . . _^
: - _ - - - ^ - ;>e
of BaJiachians. ScTjdder suggests a somewhat prosaic use in
- - " ;ra to be _ - - - :r-
ae tne --s.
aead some oc them almost as large m aze. But the word " ver>-
: - -w-ae v^ - _ .lid traces of
an imiired joint at tne aid of the taii in some :^?ecimai5. We
:' the scc" -
p«;hnrf«r it xmda" uic >.< ; n. were perieczed a: tois eariy usie.
Thus we have in the ir back C^-~-"""""e-:'US ajre a creature as
THR '■ air-j^^kath;
ekboratdy ornameaited arid protected a$ st»y of ^iosed to cofi£orm. I isaay add be:ts, tho«^ tfaey <&1 jskX appear liO isiajsre tr>e
'Ilie answer k tiiat ^ae cascBaaastaiJoes of preserve
of reptikrs f^jnnn m the Carv/n/f-ero^a^
It 13 evwient frocn true rerr ::
in ffylonorf .'^ - ■ - -^ - ^-
arijd stout <:a5*-
strong and thdr articulaiioc y finaa, to
have . 'J
leap. _ - ., ... , . -. , - '^
more finraly knit tiaan tiioee of De»drirfet'm. YwCe^. 'Sm.
ryaexrdy a more hi^lj viialized jaaoscular srsseia. If to do^se
puzzling in its afiiruEtjes vben a.raatoms.':-. ^ered. k ciearir
not to be ranked as Lo^r ir -' : -. - - ' "viem
tailed Barrach:ajis. or even -. . . - imasi
add to these also, as importaia pc-n^ o«r' cusereace, ir^ bocj
icales widi irBidi it vas armed bekyir,. and ti^ie oraaaie apcja-
284 THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS
ratus of horny appendages, with which it was clad above.
These last, as described in the last section, show that this little
animal was not a squalid, slimy dweller in mud, like Meno-
branchiis and its allies, but rather a beautiful and sprightly
tenant of the coal-formation thickets, vying in brilliancy, and
perhaps in colouring, with the insects which it pursued and
devoured. Remains of as many as eight or ten individuals
have been obtained from three erect Sigillariae, indicating that
these creatures were quite abundant, as well as active and ter-
restrial in their mode of life.
With respect to the affinities of this species, I think it is
abundantly manifest that it presents no close relationship with
any reptile hitherto discovered in the Carboniferous system,
except perhaps some of the smaller forms in the Permian of
Europe, with which Credner and Fritsch have compared it. It
is scarcely necessary to say that the characters above described
entirely remove this animal from the Labyrinthodonts. Equal
difficulties attend the attempt to place it in any other grou})
of recent or extinct Batrachians or proper reptiles. The struc-
tures of the skull, and of some points in the vertebra?, certainly
resemble those of Batrachians ; but, on the other hand, the
well-developed ribs, evidently adapted to enlarge the chest in
respiration, the pelvis, and the cutaneous covering, are un-
exampled in modern Batrachians, and assimilate the creature
to the true lizards. I ha\e already, in my original description
of the animal in 1859, expressed my belief that Hylonovitis
may have had lacertian affinities, but I do not desire to speak
too positively in this matter ; ^ and thall content myself with
stating the following alternatives as to the probable relations
of these animals, (i) They may have been true reptiles of low
type, and with batrachian tendencies. (2) They may have
been representatives of a new family of Batrachians, exhibit-
ing in some points lacertian affinities. (3) They may have
* I am glad to say that Fritsch and Credner now lean to the same view.
THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 285
been the young of some larger reptile, too large and vigorous
to be entrapped in the pitfalls presented by the hollow Sigil-
laria stumps, and in its adult state losing the batrachian pecu-
liarities apparent in the young. Whichever of these views we
may adopt, the fact remains, that in the structure of this curi-
ous little creature we have peculiarities both batrachian and
lacertian, in so far as our experience of modern animals is
concerned. It would, however, accord with observed facts in
relation to other groups of extinct animals, that the primitive
Batrachians of the coal period should embrace in their struc-
tures points in after times restricted to the true reptiles. On
the other hand, it would equally accord with such facts that
the first-born of Lacertians should lean towards a lower type, by
which they may have been preceded. My present impression
is, that they may constitute a separate family or order, to w'hich
I would give the name of Microsauria, and which may be
regarded as allied, on the one hand, to certain of the humbler
lizards, as the Gecko or Agama, and, on the ot];er, to the
tailed Batrachians.
It is likely that Hyloiionius Lyelli was less aquatic in its
habits than Dendrerpeton. Its food consisted, apparently, of
insects and similar creatures. The teeth would indicate this,
and near its bones there are portions of coprolite, containing
remains of insects and myriapods. It probably occasionally
fell a prey to Dendrerpeton, as bones, which may have belonged
either to young individuals of this species or to its smaller
congener H. Jlyniani, are found in larger coprolites, which
may be referred with probability to Dendrerpeton Acadianuin.
This coprolitic matter, which is somewhat plentiful on some of
the surfaces in the erect trees, also informs us that the im-
prisoned animals may in some cases have continued to live for
some time, feeding on such animals as may have fallen into
their place of confinement, which was destined also to be
their tomb. Some other points of interest appear on the
286 THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS
examination of this excrementitious matter. It contains much
carbonate of Hme, indicating that snails or other moUusks
furnished a considerable part of the food of the smaller rep-
tiles. Some portions of it are filled with chitinous fragments,
parts of millipedes or insects, but usually so broken up as
scarcely to be distinguishable. One curious exception was a
part of the head of an insect containing a portion of one of its
eyes. The facets of this can be readily seen with the micro-
scope, and are similar to those of modern cockroaches. About
250 of these little eyes are discernible, and they must have
been much more numerous. Two points are of interest here :
First, the perfection of the compound eye for vision in air.
It had long before, in the case of the Trilobites, been used for
seeing under water. Secondly, the great age of the still ubi-
quitous and aggressive family of the cockroaches. In point of
fact the oldest known insect, the Protoblattina of the Silurian,
is one of these creatures, and they are the most abundant in-
sects in the Carboniferous, so that if they now dispute with us
the possession of our food, they may at least put in the claim
of prior occupancy of the world. In one mass a quantity of
thickish crust or shell appears, which under the microscope
presents a minutely tubular and laminated appearance. It may
have belonged to some small crustacean or large scorpion on
which a Dendrerpeton may have been feeding before it fellinto
the pit in which it was entombed.
In addition to the reptilian species above noticed, the erect
trees of Coal Mine Point have afforded several others. There
is a second and smaller species of Dendrerpeton {D. Oiveni)
and other forms belonging to the group of Microsauria of which
Hylonomus is the type. A second species of that genus (//.
liy/na/ii) has already been mentioned. A similar creature, but
of larger size and with teeth of a wedge or chisel shape, has
been referred to a distinct genus, Smikrpeton. It seems to
have been rare, and the only skeleton found is very imperfect.
Dolichosotna longissimuin, a serpentiform rennian Batrachian after
Fritsch. This and Hylonomus are opposite or extreme types in regard to
general form.
THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 287
Its teeth are of a form that may have served even for
vegetable food, as their sharp edges must have had considerable
cutting power. Another curious form of tooth appears in the
genus Hylerpeton. It has the points worked into oblique
grooves separated by sharp edges, which must have greatly
aided in piercing tough integument. These creatures seem to
have been of stout and robust build, with large limbs. Still
another generic type {Frifschia) is represented by a species
near to Hylonomus in several respects, and with long and beau-
tifully formed limb bones, but with the belly protected with
rod-like bodies instead of scales. In this respect Hylerpeton
is somewhat intermediate, having long and narrow scales on
the belly instead of the oval or roundish scales of Hylonomus.
All these last-mentioned forms are Microsaurians, with simple
teeth and well-developed ribs and limbs, and smooth cranial
bones. Two other species are represented by portions of
single skeletons too imperfect to allow them to be certainly
determined.
I would emphasize here that the vertebrate animals found
in the erect trees are necessarily a selection from the most
exclusively terrestrial forms, and from the smaller species of
these. The numerous newt-like and serpentiform species found
in the shales of the coal formation could not find access to these
peculiar repositories, nor could the larger species of the Laby-
rinthodonts and their allies, even if they were in the habit of
occasionally prowling in the forests in search of prey, and this
would scarcely be likely, more especially as the waters must
have afforded to them much more abundant supplies of food.
Of the numerous species figured by Fritsch, Cope and Huxley,
only a few approach very near to the forms entrapped in the
old hollow Sigillariae, though several have characters half ba-
trachian and half reptilian.
288 THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS
Invertebrate Air-breathers.
The coal formation rocks have afforded Land Snails, jSIilli-
pedes, Spiders, Scorpions and Insects, so that all the great
types of invertebrate life which up to this day can live on land
already had representatives in this ancient period. Some of
them, indeed, we can trace further back, the land snails prob-
ably to the Devonian, the Millipedes to the same period, and
the Scorpions and insects as far as the Silurian. No land ver-
tebrate is yet known, older than the Lower Carboniferous, but
there is nothing known to us in physical condition, to preclude
the existence of such creatures at least in the Devonian.
It would take us too far afield to attempt to notice the in-
vertebrate land life of the Palaeozoic in general. This has been
done in great detail by Dr. Scudder. I shall here limit myself
to the animals found in our erect trees, and merely touch in-
cidentally on such others as may be connected with them.
I have already mentioned the occurrence of a land snail,
a true pulmonate moUusk, in the first find by Lyell and my-
self at Coal Mine Point, and this was the first animal of this
kind known in any rocks older than the Purbeck formation of
England. It is one of the groups of so-called Chrysalis-shells,
scarcely distinguishable at first sight from some modern West
Indian species, and distinctly referable to the modern genus
Pupa. It was named Pupa vetusta, and a second and smaller
species subsequently found was named P. P/[i,^s/>r/, and a third
of different form, and resembling the modern snails, bears the
name Zonites priscus. The only other Palaeozoic land mol-
lusks known at present are a few species found in the coal
formation of Ohio, and a fragment supposed to indicate another
species from the Devonian plant beds of St. John's, New
Brunswick. This last is the oldest known evidence of pulmon-
ate snails. If we ask the precise relations of these creatures to
modern snails, it may be answered that of the two leading sub-
S. E
*s:5Mr^^
n^ Carbumferol's Land Snails.
Pufa vetusla, Baiwin, and Coiiulus pnsca. Carpenter, with egg of Pupa
vettista — Ihe whole considerably magnified.
I published in iSSo, in the A'lteri-
cait Journal of Science, a fragment of
what seemed to be a land snail, from
the Middle Erian plant beds of St.
John, New Brunswick {Strophia grand-
tcva, figured above), but have mentioned
it with some doubt in the te.xt. Mr. G.
F. Matthew has, however, recently
communicated to the Royal Society of
Canada a second species, found by Mr.
W. I. Wilson in the same beds, and
which he names Pupa priuurva. It is
accompanied with a scorpion and a
millipede. Thus the existence of Land
Snails of the Pupa type in the Devonian
may be considered as established.
A Dkvonian Land Snail.
THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 289
divisions of the group of air-breathing snails {Pitlmonifera), the
Operculate, or those with a movable plate to close the mouth
of the shell, and the Inoperculate, or those that are destitute
of any such shelly lid or operculum to close the shell, the first
has been traced no farther back than the Eocene. The second
or inoperculate division, includes some genera that are aquatic
and some that are terrestrial. Of the aquatic genera no re-
presentatives are known in formations older than the Wealden
and Purbeck, and these only in Europe. The terrestrial group,
or the family of the Ifeh'cidie, which, singularly enough, is that
which diverges farthest from the ordinary gill-bearing Gastero-
pods, is the one which has been traced farthest back, and
includes the Palaeozoic species. It is further remarkable that
a very great gap exists in the geological history of this family.
No species are known between the Carboniferous and the early
Tertiary, though in the intervening formations there are many
fresh-water and estuarine deposits in which such remains
might be expected to occur. There is perhaps no reason to
doubt the continuance of the Helicidas through this long por-
tion of geological time, though it is probable that during the
interval the family did not increase much in the numbers of
its species, more especially as it seems certain that it has its
culmination in the modern period, where it is represented by
very many and large species, which are dispersed over nearly
all parts of our continents.
The mode of occurrence of the Palaeozoic Pulmonifcra in
the few localities where they have been found is characteristic.
The earliest known species, Pi/pa retiista, was found, as
already stated, in the material filling the once hollow stem of
a Sigillaria at the South Joggins in Nova Scotia, and many
additional specimens have subsequently been obtained from
similar repositories in the same locality, where they are associ-
ated with bones of Batrachians and remains of Millipedes.
Other specimens, and also the species Zonites pn'scus, have
290 THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS
been found in a thin, shaly layer, containing debris of plants
and crusts of Cyprids, and which was probably deposited at
the outlet of a small stream flowing through the coal-formation
forest. The two species found in Illinois occur, according to
Bradley, in an underclay or fossil soil which may have been
the bed of a pond or estuary, and subsequently became a
forest subsoil. The Erian species occurs in shales charged
with remains of land plants, and which must consequently
have received abundant drainage from neighbouring land. It
is only in such deposits that remains of true land snails can be
expected to occur ; though, had fresh water or brackish water
Pulmonates abounded in the Carboniferous age, their remains
should have occurred in those bituminous and calcareo-bitu-
minous shales which contain such vast quantities of debris of
Cyprids, Lamellibranchs and fishes of the period, mixed with
fossil plants.
The specimen first obtained in 1887 having been taken by
Sir Charles Lyell to the United States, and submitted to the
late Prof. Jeffries Wyman, the shell in question was recognised
by him and the late Dr. Gould, of Boston, as a land shell. It
was subsequently examined by M. Deshayes and Mr. Gwyn
Jeffries, who concurred in this determination ; and its micro-
scopic structure was described by the late Prof. Quekett, of
London, as similar to that of modern land shells. The single
specimen obtained on this occasion was somewhat crushed,
and did not show the aperture. Hence the hesitation as to
its nature, and the delay in naming it, though it was figured
and described in the paper above cited in 1852. Better
specimens showing the aperture were afterward obtained by
the writer, and it was named and described by him in his
"Air-breathers of the Coal Period," in 1863. Owen, in his
" Palaeontology," subsequently proposed the generic name
Deiidropiipa. This I have hesitated to accept, as expressing
a generic distinction not warranted by the facts ; but should
THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 29 1
the shell be considered to require a generic or sub-generic
distinction, Owen's name should be adopted for it. There
seems, however, nothing to prevent it "from being placed in
one of the modern sub-genera of simple-lipped Pupae. With
regard to the form of its aperture, I may explain that some
currency has been given to an incorrect representation of it,
through defective specimens. In the case of delicate shells
like this, imbedded in a hard matrix, it is of course difficult
to work out the aperture perfectly ; and in my published
figure in the "Air-breathers," I had to restore somewhat the
broken specimens in my possession. This restoration, speci-
mens subsequently found have shown to be very exact.
As already stated, this shell seems closely allied to some
modern Pupae. Perhaps the modern species which approaches
most nearly to it in form, markings and size, is MacrocheUus
Gossei from the West Indies, specimens of which were sent to
me some years ago by Mr. Bland, of New York, with the
remark that they must be very near to my Carboniferous
species. Such edentulous species as Pupa {Leucoc/iila) fallax
of Eastern America very closely resemble it ; and it was re-
garded by the late Dr. Carpenter as probably a near ally of
those species which are placed by some European concholo-
gists in the genus Pupilla.
Pupa vetusta has been found at three distinct levels in the
coal formation of the South Joggins. The lowest is the shale
above referred to. The next, 1,217 feet higher, is that of the
original discovery. The third, 800 feet higher, is in an erect
Sigillaria holding no other remains. Thus, this shell has lived
in the locality at least during the accumulation of 2,000 feet
of beds, including a number of coals and erect forests, as well
as beds of bituminous .shales and calcareo-bituminous shale,
the growth of which must have been very slow.
In the lowest of these three horizons the shells are found,
as already stated, in a thin bed of concretionary clay of dark
292 THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS
grey colour, though associated with reddish beds. It contains
Zonitcs priscus as well, though this is very rare, and there are
a few valves of Cythere and shells of Naiadiies as well as
carbonaceous fragments, fronds of ferns, 2^rigo)wcarpa, etc.
The Piipce are mostly adult, but many very young shells also
occur, as well as fragments of broken shells. The bed is
evidently a layer of mud deposited in a pond or creek, or at
the mouth of a small stream. In modern swamps multitudes
of fresh-water shells occur in such places, and it is remarkable
that in this case the only Gasteropods are land shells, and
these very plentiful, though only in one bed about an inch in
thickness. This would seem to imply an absence of fresh-
water Pulmonifera. In the erect Sigillarice of the second
horizon the shells occur either in a sandy matrix, more or less
darkened with vegetable matter, or in a carbonaceous mass
composed mainly of vegetable debris. Except when crushed
or flattened, the shells in these rei)Ositories are usually filled
with brownish calcite. From this I infer that most of them
were alive when imbedded, or at least that they contained the
bodies of the animals ; and it is not improbable that they
sheltered themselves in the hollow trees, as is the habit of
many similar animals in modern forests. Their residence in
these trees, as well as the characters of their embryology, are
illustrated by the occurrence of their mature ova. One of
those, which I have considered worth figuring, has been broken
in such a way as to show the embryo shell.
They may also have formed part of the food of the reptilian
animals whose remains occur with them. In illustration of
this I have elsewhere stated that I have found as many as
eleven unbroken shells of Fhysa heierostropha in the stomach
of a modern Menobianchus. I think it certain, however, that
both the shells and the reptiles occurring in these trees must
have been strictly terrestrial in their habits, as they could not
have found admission to the erect trees unless the ground had
THE OLDEST AIR-DREATIIERS 20^
been sufficiently dry to allow several feet of the imbedded
hollow trunks to be free from water. In the highest of the
three horizons the shells occurred in an erect tree, but without
any other fossils, and they had apparently been washed in
along with a greyish mud.^
If we exclude the alleged Palieorbis referred to below, all
the Palaeozoic Pulmonifera hitherto found are American.
Since, however, in the Carboniferous age, Batrachians, Arach-
nidans, Insects and Millipedes occur on both continents, it is
not unlikely that ere long European species of land snails will
be announced. The species hitherto found in Eastern
America are in every way strangely isolated. In the plant
beds of St. John, about 9,000 feet in thickness, and in the
coal formation of the South Joggins, more than 7,000 feet in
thickness, no other Gasteropods occur, nor, I believe, do any
occur in the beds holding land snails in Illinois. Nor, as
already stated,- are any of the aquatic Pulmonifera known in
the Palceozoic. Thus, in so far as at present known, these
Palreozoic snails are separated not only from any predecessors,
if there were any, or successors, but from any contemporary
animals allied to them.
It is probable that the land snails of the Erian and Carboni-
ferous were neither numerous nor important members of the
faunae of those periods. Had other species existed in any
considerable numbers, there is no reason why they should not
have been found in the erect trees, or in those shales which
contain land plants. More especially would the discovery of
any larger species, had they existed, been likely to have
occurred. Further, what we know of the vegetation of the
Palreozoic period would lead us to infer that it did not abound
' The discovery of the shells in this tree was made by Albeit I. Hill,
C.E. The tree is in Group XXVI. of Division 4 of my Joggins section.
Tlie original rcpliliferous trees aic in Ciroiip X V., and ihe lowest bed in
Groiip VIII.
294 THE OLDEST AIR BREATHERS
in those succulent and nutritious leaves and fruits which are
most congenial to land snails. It is to b^ observed, however,
that we know little as yet of the upland life of the Erian or
Carboniferous. The animal life of the drier parts of the low
country is indeed as yet very little known ; and but for the
revelations in this respect of the erect trees in one bed in the
coal formation of Nova Scotia, our knowledge of the land
snails and Millipedes, and also of an eminently terrestrial group
of reptiles, the Microsanria, would have been much more
imperfect than it is. We may hope for still further revelations
of this kind, and in the meantime it would be premature to
speculate as to the affinities of our little group of land snails
with animals either their contemporaries or belonging to
earlier or later formations, except to note the fact of the little
change of form or structure in this type of life in that vast
interval of time which separates the Erian period from the
present day.
It may be proper to mention here the alleged Pulmonifera
of the genus Palxorbis described by some German naturalists.
These I believe to be worm tubes of the genus Spirorbis, and
in fact to be nothing else than the common ^. carbonariiis or
S. piisillus of the coal formation. The history of this error
may be stated thus. The eminent palasobotanists Germar,
Goeppert and Geinitz have referred the Spirorbis, so common
in the Coal measures to the fungi, under the name Gyromyccs,
and in this they have been followed by other naturalists,
though as long ago as 1868 I had shown that this little
organism is not only a calcareous shell, attached by one side
to vegetable inatters and shells of mollusks, but that it has the
microscopic structure characteristic of modern shells of this
type.^ More recently Van Beneden, Ca^nius, and Goldenberg,
perceiving that the fossil is really a calcareous shell, but
' "Acadian Cleology,'" 2nd eilition, p. 205.
Carhonifekous Mii.i.irEDES, Xylohiits Sii^illaihc, Darwin (-!ce and their con-
temporaries must often have been placed in conditions un-
favourable or fatal to them, and when their remains are
preserved to us in these conditions, we may form very incorrect
inferences as to their mode of life. Further, it is to be
observed that the conditions of submergence and silting up
which were favourable to the preservation of specimens of
Sigillaricp as fossils, must have been precisely those which
' It is unfortunate that few writers on this subject have combined with
the knowledge of the geological features of the coal a sufficient acquaint-
ance with the phenomena of modern marshes and swamps, and with the
conditions necessary for the growth of plants such as those of the coal.
It would be easy to show, were this a proper place to do so, that the
" swells," " rock faults," splitting of beds, and other appearances of coal
seams quite accord with the tlieory of swamp accumulation ; that the
plants associated with SigiliaricB could not have lived with their roots
immersed in salt water ; that the chemical character of the underclays
implies drainage and other conditions impossible under the sea ; that the
composition and minute structure of the coal are incompatible with the
supposition that it is a deposit from water, and especially from salt water;
and that it would be more natural to invoke wind driftage as a mode of
accumulation for some of the sandstones, than water driftage for the forma-
tion of tlie coal. At the same tinve it is pretty certain that such beds as
the cannels and earthy bitumens which appear to consist of finely com-
minuted vegetable matter, without mineral charcoal, may have been de-
posits of muck in shallow lakes or lagoons.
" Journal of Ceol. Socy., vols. x. and xv. , and "Acadian Geology."
too THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS
were destructive to them as living plants ; and on the contrary,
that the conditions in which these forests may have flourished
for centuries must have been those in which there was little
chance of their remains being preserved to us, in any other
condition at least than that of coal, which reveals only to
careful microscopic examination the circumstances, whether
aerial or aquatic, under which it was formed.
It is also noticeable that, in conditions such as those of the
coal formation, it would be likely that some plants would be
specially adapted to occupy newly emerged flats and places
liable to inundation and silting up. I believe that many of the
Sigillarice, and still more eminently the Calamilcs, were suit-
able to such stations. There is direct evidence that the nuts
named Trigonocarpa were drifted extensively by water over
submerged flats of mud. Many Cardiocarpa were winged
seeds which may have drifted in the air. The Calamites may,
like modern Eqitiseta^ have produced spores with elaters cap-
able of floating them in the wind. One of the thinner coals
at the Joggins is filled with spores or spore cases that seem to
have carried hairs on their surfaces, and may have been suited
to such a mode of dissemination. I have elsewhere proved ^
that at least some species of Calamites were, by their mode of
growth, admirably fitted for growing amid accumulating sedi-
ment, and for promoting its accumulation.
The reptiles of the coal formation are [probably the oldest
known to us, and possibly, though this we cannot aftirm, the
highest products of creation in this period. Supposing, for
the moment, that they are the highest animals of their time,
and, what is perhaps less likely, that those which we know are a
fair average of the rest, we have the curious fact that they are
all carnivorous, and the greater part of them fitted to find food
in the water as well as on the land. 'J'he plant feeders of the
period, on the land at least, are all invertebrates, as snails,
* "Acadian Geology," chapter on Coal Plants.
THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 30I
millipedes, and perhaps insects. The air-breathing vertebrates
are not intended to consume the exuberant vegetable growth,
but to check the increase of its animal enemies. Plant life
would thus seem to have had in every way the advantage.
The millipedes probably fed only on roots and decaying sub-
stances, the snails on the more juicy and succulent plants
growing in the shadow of the woods, and the great predomi-
nance of the family of cockroaches among carboniferous insects
points to similar conclusions as to that class. While, moreover,
the vegetation of the coal swamps was most abundant, it was
not, on the whole, of a character to lead us to suppose that it
supported many animals. Our knowledge of the flora of the
coal swamps is sufficiently complete to exclude from them any
abundance of the higher phaenogamous plants. We know
little, it is true, of the flora of the uplands of the period ; but
when we speak of the coal-formation land, it is to the flats only
that we refer. The foliage of the plants on these flats with the
exception of that of the ferns, was harsh and meagre, and there
seem to have been no grasses or other nutritious herbaceous
plants. These are wants of themselves likely to exclude many
of the higher forms of herbivorous life. On the other hand,
there was a profusion of large nut-like seeds, which in a modern
forest would probably have afforded subsistence to squirrels
and similar animals. The pith and thick soft bark of many of
the trees must at certain seasons have contained much nutri-
tive matter, while there was certainly sufficient material for all
those insects whose larvae feed on living and dead timber, as
well as for the creatures that in turn prey on them. It is re-
markable that there seem to have been no vertebrate animals
fitted to avail themselves of these vast stores of food. The
question : " What may have fed on all this vegetation ? " was
never absent from my mind in all my explorations of the Nova
Scotia coal sections ; but no trace of any creature other than
those already mentioned has ever rewarded my search. In
S. E. 2 2
302 THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS
Nova Scotia it would seem that a few snails, gally-worms, and
insects were the sole links of connection between the plant
creation and air-breathing vertebrates. Is this due to the
paucity of the fauna, or the imperfection of the record ? The
fact that a few erect stumps have revealed nearly all the air-
breathers yet found, argues strongly for the latter cause ; but
there are some facts bearing on the other side.
A gally-worm, if, like its modern relatives, hiding in crevices
of wood in forests, was one of the least likely animals to be
found in aqueous deposits. The erect trees gave it its almost
sole chance of preservation. Pupa vetiista is a small species,
and its shell very thin and fragile, while it probably lived among
thick vegetation. Further, the measures 2,000 feet thick,
separating the lowest and highest beds in which it occurs, in-
clude twenty-one coal seams, having an aggregate thickness of
about twenty feet, three beds of bituminous limestone of animal
origin, and perhaps twenty beds holding Stigfuaria in situ, or
erect Sigil/a?-i(e and Calamites. The lapse of time implied by
this succession of beds, many of them necessarily of very slow
deposition, must be very great, though it would be mere guess
work to attempt to resolve it into years. Yet long though this
interval must have been, Pupa vetusta lasted without one iota
of change through it all ; and, more remarkable still, was not
accompanied by more than two other species of its fomily.
Where so many specimens occur, and in situations so diverse,
without any additional species, the inference is strong that no
other of similar habits existed. If in any of those subtropical
islands, whose climate and productions somewhat resemble
those of the coal period, after searching in and about decaying
trees, and also on the bars upon which rivers and lakes drifted
their burdens of shells, we should find only three species, but
one of these in very great numbers, we would surely conclude
that other species, if present, were very rare.
Again, footprints referable io Dend re >pe to u, or similar animals,
THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 303
occur in the lower Carboniferous beds below the marine lime-
stones, in the middle coal measures, and in the upper coal
formation, separated by a thickness of beds which may be
estimated at 15,000 feet, and certainly representing a vast lapse
of time. Did we know the creature by these impressions
alone, we might infer its continued existence for all this great
length of time; but when we also find its bones in the princi-
pal repositories of reptile remains, and in company with the
other creatures found with it, we satisfy ourselves that of them
all it was the most likely to have left its trail in the mud flats.
We thus have reason to conclude that it existed alone during
this period, in so far as its especial kind of habitat was con-
cerned ; though there lived with it other reptiles, some of
which, haunting principally the woods, and others the water,
were less likely to leave impressions of their footprints. These
may be but slight indications of truth, but they convey strong
impressions of the persistence of species, and also of the pau-
city of species belonging to these tribes at the time.
If we could affirm that the Air-breathers of the coal period
were really the first species of their families, they might acquire
additional interest by their bearing on this question of origin
of species. We cannot affirm this ; but it may be a harmless
and not uninstructive play of fancy to suppose for a moment
that they actually are so, and to inquire on this supposition as
to the mode of their introduction. Looking at them from this
point of view, we shall first be struck with the fact that they
belong to all of the three great leading types of animals which
include our modern Air-breathers — the Vertebrates, the Arthro-
pods, and the IMollusks. We have besides to consider in this
connection that the breathing organs of an insect are air tubes
opening laterally (trachere), those of a land snail merely a
modification of the chamber which in marine species holds the
gills, while those of the reptiles represent the air bladder of the
fishes. Thus, in the three groups the breathing organs are
304 THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS
quite distinct in their nature and affinities. This at once ex-
cludes the supposition that they can all have been derived from
each other within the limits of the coal period. No transmu-
tationist can have the hardihood to assert the convertibility, by
any direct method, of a snail into a millipede or an insect, or
of either into a reptile. The plan of structure in these crea-
tures is not only different, but contrasted in its most essential
features. It would be far more natural to suppose that these
animals sprang from aquatic species of their respective types.
We should then seek for the ancestors of the snail in aquatic
Gasteropods, for those of the millipede in worms or Crustaceans,
and for those of the reptiles in the fishes of the period. It
would be easy to build up an imaginary series of stages, on
the principle of natural selection, whereby these results might
be effected ; but the hypothesis would be destitute of any sup-
port from fact, and would be beset by more difficulties than it
removes. Why should the result of the transformation of
water snails breathing by gills be a Pupa 1 Would it not much
more likely be an Auricula or a Limnca ? It will not solve
this difficulty to say that the intermediate forms became ex-
tinct, and so are lost. On the contrary, they exist to this day,
though they were not, in so far as we know, introduced so
early. But negative evidence must not be relied on ; the
record is very imperfect, and such creatures may have existed,
though unknown to us. It may be answered that they could
not have existed in any considerable numbers, else some of
their shells would have appeared in the coal-formation beds, so
rich in crustaceans and bivalve moUusks. Further, the little
Pupa remained unchanged during a very long time, and shows
no tendency to resolve itself into anything higher, or to descend
to anything lower, while in the lowest bed in which it occurs
it is associated with a round snail of quite different type.
Here, if anywhere, in what appears to be the first introduction
of air-breithing invertebrates, we should be able to find the
THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 305
evidences of transition from the gills of the Prosobranchiate
and the Crustacean to the air sac of the Pulmonate and the
tracheae of the millipede. It is also to be observed that many
other structural changes are involved, the aggregate of which
makes a Pulmonate or a millipede different in every particular
from its nearest allies among gill-bearing Gasteropods or
Crustaceans.
It may be said, however, that the links of connection be-
tween the coal reptiles and fishes are better established. All
the known coal reptiles have leanings to the fishes in certain
characters ; and in some, as in Anhegosaurus, these are very
close. Still the interval to be bridged over is wide, and the
differences are by no means those which we should expect.
\\'ere the problem given to convert a ganoid fish into an
A>r/iegvsai/riis or Deiidrerpeton, we should be disposed to
retain unchanged such characters as would be suited to the
new habits of the creature, and to change only those directly
related to the objects in view. We should probably give little
attention to differences in the arrangement of skull bones, in
the parts of the vertebra, in the external clothing, in the micro-
scopic structure of the bone, and other peculiarities for serving
similar purposes by organs on a different plan, which are so
conspicuous so soon as we pass from the fish to the Batrachian.
It is not, in short, an improvement of the organs of the fish that
we witness so much as the introduction of new organs.^ The
foot of the batrachian bears, perhaps, as close a relation to the
fin of the fish as the screw of one steamship to the paddle
wheel of another, or as the latter to a carriage wheel ; and can
be just as rationally supposed to be not a new instrument, but
the old one changed. In this connection even a footprint in
the sand startles us as much as that of Friday did Robinson
^ An ingenious attempt by Prof. Cope, to deduce the batrachian foot
from the fins of certain carboniferous fishes, will be found in the Froceed-
iiigs of the Philos. Academy of Philadelpliia for the present year.
306 THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS
Crusoe. We see five fingers and toes, and ask how this
numerical arrangement started at once from fin rays of fishes
all over the world ; and how it has continued unchanged till
now, when it forms the basis of our decimal arithmetic.
Again, our reptiles of the coal do not constitute a continuous
series, and belong to a great number of distinct genera and
families, nor is it possible that they can all, except at widely
different times, have originated from the same source. It
either happened, for some unknown reason, that many kinds of
fishes put on the reptilian guise in the same period, or else the
vast lapse of ages required for the production of a reptile from
a fish must be indefinitely increased for the production of many
dissimilar reptiles from each other; or, on the other hand, we
must suppose that the limit between the fish and reptile being
once overpassed, a facility for comparatively rapid changes
became the property of the latter. Either supposition would,
I think, contradict such facts bearing on the subject as are
known to us.
We commenced with supposing that the rejitiles of the Coal
might possibly be the first of their fiiniily, but it is evident
from the above considerations, that on the doctrine of natural
selection, the number and variety of reptiles in this period
would imply that their predecessors in this fi)rni must have
existed from a time as early as any in which even fishes are
known to exist ; so that if we adopt any hypothesis of deriva-
tion, it would probably be necessary to have recourse to that
which supposes at particular periods a sudden and as yet un-
accountable transmutation of one form into another; a view
whi(-h, in its remoteness from anything includeil under ordinary
natural laws, does not materially differ from that currently re-
ceived idea of creative intervention, with whith, in so far as
our coal repfiles can inform us, we are for the present satisfied.
There is one other point which strikes the naturalist in con-
sidering these animals, and whicli has a certain bearing on such
THE OLDEST AIR-BREATHERS 307
hypothesis. It is the combination of various grades of reptihan
types in these ancient creatures. It has been well remarked
by Hugh Miller, and more fully by Agassiz, that this is charac-
teristic of the first appearance of new groups of animals. Now
selection, as it acts in the hands of the breeder, tends to
specialization ; and natural selection, if there is such a thing, is
supposed to tend in the same direction. But when some dis-
tinctly new form is to be introduced, an opposite tendency
seems to prevail, a sort of aggregation in one species of char-
acters afterward to be separated and manifested in distinct
groups of creatures. The introduction of such new types also
tends to degrade and deprive of their higher properties pre-
viously existing groups of lower rank. It is easy to perceive in
all this, law and order, in that higher sense in which these
terms express the will and plan of the Supreme Mind, but not
in that lower sense in which they represent the insensate
operation of blind natural forces.
Refekexcls : — " Air-bieathurs of the Coal rciiod."' Montreal, 1S86.
Papers on Reptiles, etc., in South Joggins Coal Field, Journal 0/
Geological Society of London, vols. ix. x. xi. xvi. Remains of Ani-
mals in Erect Trees in the Coal Formation of Nova Scolia, Trans.
Koyal Society, 1881. "Acadian Geology," fourth edition, 1891. Re-
vision of Land Snails of the Pahcozoic Era, Am. Journal of Science,
vol. XX., 1880. Supplementary Report to Royal Society of London,
Proceedings, 1S92. Notice of additional Reptilian Remains, Geo-
logical Magazine of London, 1891.
MARKINGS. FOOTPRINTS AND FUCOIDS.
DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF THE LATE
DR. J. J. BIGSBY, F.R.S.,
OF LONDON,
The painstaking and accukate Author
OF THE Thesaurus Siluricus and Devonico-Carbomferus,
A warm and kind Friend and Christian Gentleman
and one ok the
Pioneers of Canadian Geology.
Reminiscences of Lvei.l"s Work — Tidal Flats of the
Bay of Funuv— -Rill Marks and Shrinkage Cracks
— Worm Trails and Burrows — The Paces of Limu-
lus — FucoiDS versus Trails — Footprints of ^'ER-
tebrates
os";- i:'W\\< ^|^mH,\ \
}'
^ ^
5n
r
t
7
S ' '
\
i
~ !•■
\
.'\.
\
Track of Limulus. — Modern, Oichaid Beach.
Showing its resemblance to the Protechnites of the Cambrian. (Tage 320.)
CHAPTER XI.
MARKINGS, FOOTPRINTS AND FUCOIDS.
I BELIEVE my attention was first directed to the markings
made by animals on the surfaces of rocks, when travelling
with the late Sir Charles Lyell in Nova Scotia, in 1842. He
noticed with the greatest interest the trails of worms, insects,
and various other creatures, and the footprints of birds on the
surface of the soft red tidal mud of the Bay of Fundy, and
subsequently published his notes on the various markings in
these deposits in his "Travels in North America," and in a paper
presented to the Geological Society of London. I well re-
member how, in walking along the edge of the muddy shore,
he stopped to watch the efforts of a grasshopper that had
leaped into the soft ooze, and was painfully making a most
complicated trail in his effort to escape. Sir Charles re-
marked that if it had been so fortunate as to make these
strange and complicated tracks on some old formation now
hardened into stone and buried in the earth, it might have
given occasion to much learned discussion.
At a later period I found myself perplexed in the study of
fossil plants by the evident errors of many palaeobotanists un-
acquainted with modern markings on shores, in referring all
kinds of mere markings to the vegetable kingdom, and espe-
cially to the group of fucoids or seaweeds, which had become
a refuge for destitute objects not referable to other kinds of
fossils. It thus became necessary to collect and study these
objects, as they existed in rocks of different ages, and to com-
312 MARKINGS, FOOTPRINTS AND FUCOIDS
pare them with the examples afforded by the modern beach ;
and perhaps no locaUty could have afforded better opportuni-
ties for this than the immense tidal flats of the finest mud left
bare by the great tides of the Bay of Fundy in Nova Scotia.
At a more recent period still, the subject has come into great
prominence in Europe, and if we are to gauge its importance
by the magnitude of the costly illustrated works devoted to it
by Delgado, Saporta, Nathorst, and others, and the multitude
of scattered papers in scientific periodicals, we should regard
it as one of the most salient points in Geology.^
It may be well further to introduce the subject by a few
extracts from Lyell's work above referred to.
"The sediment with which the waters are charged is ex-
tremely fine, being derived from the destruction of cliffs of red
sandstone and shale, belonging chiefly to the coal measures.
On the borders of even the smallest estuaries communicating
with a bay, in which the tides rise sixty feet and upwards,
large areas are laid dry for nearly a fortnight between the
spring and neap tides, and the mud is then baked in summer
by a hot sun, so that it becomes solidified and traversed by
cracks caused by shrinkage. Portions of the hardened mud
may then be taken up and removed without injury. On ex-
amining the edges of each slab we observe numerous layers,
formed by successive tides, usually very thin, sometimes only
one-tenth of an inch thick, of unequal thickness, however,
because, according to Dr. ^\'ebster, the night tides rising a
foot higher than the day tides throw down more sediment.
When a shower of rain falls, the highest portion of the mud-
covered flat is usually too hard to receive any impressions ;
while that recently uncovered by the tide, near the water's
edge, is too soft. Between these areas a zone occurs almost
as smooth and even as a looking-glass, on which every drop
forms a cavity of circular or oval form ; and if the shower be
^ Journal of Londo)! dologiial Society, \o\. vii. p. 239.
MARKINGS, FOOTPRINTS AND FUCOIDS 313
transient, these pits retain their shape permanently, being dried
by the sun, and being then too firm to be effaced by the
action of the succeeding tide, which deposits upon them a new
layer of mud. Hence we find, on splitting open a slab an
inch or more thick, on the upper surface of which the marks
of recent rain occur, that an inferior layer, deposited perhaps
ten or fourteen tides previously, exhibits on its under surfiice
perfect casts of rain prints which stand out in relief, the moulds
of the same being seen in the layer below."
After mentioning that a continued shower of rain obliterates
the more regular impressions, and produces merely a blistered
or uneven surface, and describing minutely the characteristics
of true rain marks in their most perfect state, Sir Charles
adds : —
"On some of the specimens the winding tubular tracks of
worms are seen, which have been bored just beneath the
surface. Sometimes the worms have dived beneath the sur-
face, and then re-appeared. Occasionally the same mud is
traversed by the footprints of birds {Tringa mhnifa), and of
musk-rats, minks, dogs, sheep and cats. The leaves also of
the elm, maple and oak trees have been scattered by the
winds over the soft mud, and having been buried under the
deposits of succeeding tides, are found on dividing the layers.
When the leaves themselves are removed, very faithful im-
pressions, not only of their outline, but of their minutest veins,
are left imprinted on the clay."
This is a minor illustration of that application of recent
causes to explain ancient effects of which the great English
geologist was the apostle and advocate, and which he so
admirably practised in his own work. It is also an illustration
of the fact that things the most perishable and evanescent
may, when buried in the crust of the earth, become its most
durable monuments. Footprints in the sand of the tidal shore
are in the ordinary course of events certain to be obliterated
314 MARKINGS, FOOTPRINTS AND FUCOIDS
by the next tide ; but when carefully filled up by gently de-
posited new material, and hardened into stone, there is no limit
to their duration.
Let us inquire how this may take place, and the tidal flats
of the Bay of Fundy and Basin of Minas may supply us with
the information desired. In the upper parts of the Bay of
Fundy and its estuaries the rise and fall of tide, as is well
known, are excessive. I quote the following description of
the appearance they present from a work of earlier date : —
" The tide wave that sweeps to the north-east, along the
Atlantic coast of the United States, entering the funnel-like
mouth of the Bay of Fundy, becomes compressed and elevated,
as the sides of the bay gradually approach each other, until in
the narrower parts the water runs at the rate of six or seven
miles per hour, and the vertical rise of the tide amounts to
sixty feet or more. In Cobequid and Chiegnecto Bays these
tides, to an unaccustomed spectator, have rather the aspect of
some rare convulsion of nature than of an ordinary daily
phenomenon. At low tide wide flats of broNyn mud are seen
to extend for miles, as if the sea had altogether retired from
its bed ; and the distant channel appears as a mere strip of
muddy water. At the commencement of flood a slight ripple
is seen to break over the edge of the flats. It rushes swiftly
forward, and, covering the lower flats almost instantaneously,
gains rapidly on the higher swells of mud, which appear as if
they were being dissolved in the turbid waters. At the same
time the torrent of red water enters all the channels, creeks
and estuaries ; surging, whirling, and foaming, and often having
in its front a white, breaking wave, or ' bore,' which runs
steadily forward, meeting and swallowing up the remains of
the ebb still trickling down the channels. The mud flats are
soon covered; and then, as the stranger sees the water gaining
with noiseless and steady rapidity on the steep sides of banks
and cliffs, a sense of insecurity creeps over him, as if no limit
MARKINGS, FOOTPRINTS AND FUCOIDS 315
could be set to the advancing deluge. In a little time, how-
ever, he sees that the fiat, ' Hitherto shalt thou come, and no
farther,' has been issued to the great bay tide : its retreat com-
mences, and the waters rush back as rapidly as they entered.
" The rising tide sweeps away the fine material from every
exposed bank and cliff, and becomes loaded with mud and
extremely fine sand, which, as it stagnates at high water, it
deposits in a thin layer on the surface of the flats. This layer,
which may vary in thickness from a quarter of an inch to a
quarter of a line, is coarser and thicker at the outer edge of
the flats than nearer the shore ; and hence these flats, as well
as the marshes, are usually higher near the channels than at
their inner edge. From the same cause, — the more rapid de-
position of the coarser sediment, — the lower side of each layer
is arenaceous, and sometimes dotted over with films of mica,
while the upper side is fine and slimy, and when dry has a
shining and polished surface. The falling tide has little effect
on these deposits, and hence the gradual growth of the flats,
until they reach such a height that they can be overflowed only
by the high spring tides. They then become natural or salt
marsh, covered with the coarse grasses and carices which grow
in such places. So far the process is carried on by the hand
of nature ; and before the colonization of Nova Scotia, there
were large tracts of this grassy alluvium to excite the wonder
and delight of the first settlers on the shores of the Bay of
Fundy. Man, however, carries the land - making process
farther; and by diking and draining, excludes the sea water,
and produces a soil capable of yielding for an indefinite period,
without manure, the most valuable cultivated grains and
grasses."
The mud of these great tidal flats is at the surface of a red
colour, and so fine that when the tide leaves it and its surface
becomes dry, it shines in the sun as if polished. It is thus
capable of taking the finest impressions. When the tide is in,
S. E. 23
3l6 MARKINGS, FOOTPRINTS AND FUCOIDS
numerous small fish of various species occupy the ground and
may leave marks of their fins and tails as they gambol or seek
their food. Shell fishes, worms, and Crustaceans scramble
over the same surface, or make burrows in it. As the tide
recedes flocks of sandpipers and crows follow it down, and
leave an infinity of footprints, and even quadrupeds like the
domestic hog go far out at low water in search of food. It is
said that in some parts of the Bay the hogs are so assiduous
in this pursuit that they even awake and go out on the flats in
the night tide, and that they have so learned to dread the
dangers of the flood, that when in the darkness they hear the
dull sound of the approaching bore, they squeal with fear and
rush madly for the shore.
If we examine it minutely, we shall find that the tidal de-
posit is laminated. The tidal water is red and muddy, and
holds in suspension sediment of various degrees of coarseness.
This, undergoes a certain process of levigation. In the first
run of the flood the coarser material falls to the bottom. As
its force diminishes the finer material is deposited, and at full
tide, when the current has ceased, the finest of all settles,
forming a delicate coat of the purest and most tenacious clay.
Thus, if a block of the material is taken up and allowed to
dry, it tends to separate into thin laminae, each of which re-
presents a tide, and is somewhat sandy below, and passes into
the finest moulding clay above. The tracks and impressions
preserved are naturally made on the last or finest deposit, and
filled in with the coarser or more sandy of the next tide. But
this may take place in difi"erent ways. Impressions made
under water at flood tide, or on the surface left bare by the
ebb, may in favourable localities be sufiiciently tenacious or
firm to resist the abrading action of the flood, and may thus
be covered and preserved by the next layer, and in this way
they may be seen on splitting up a block of the dried mud.
But in shallow places and near the shore, where the deposit
MARKINGS, FOOTPRINTS AND FUCOIDS 317
has time to consolidate and become dried by the sun and air
before the next tide, much better impressions are preserved ;
and lastly, on those parts of the shore which are reached only
by the spring tides, the mud of the highest tide of course may
have several days to harden before the next tide reaches it,
and in this case it becomes cracked by an infinity of shrinkage
cracks, which, when it is next covered with the tide, are filled
with new sediment. In this way is produced in great perfec-
tion that combination of footprints, or even of impressions of
rain, with casts of cracks, which is so often seen in the older
rocks. Where on the sides of channels or near the shore the
mud has a considerable slope, another and very curious effect
results. As the tide ebbs the water drains off the surface, or
oozing out of the wet sand and mud, forms at the top of the
bank minute grooves often no larger than fine threads. These
coalesce and form small channels, and these, again, larger ones,
till at low tide the whole sloping surface is seen to be covered
with a smooth and beautiful tracery resembling the rivers on
a map, or the impressions of the trunks and branches of trees,
or the fronds of gigantic seaweeds. These " rill marks," as
they have been called, are found in great abundance in the
coal formation and triassic sandstones and shales, and I am
sorry to say, have often been named and described as Fucoids,
and illustrated by sumptuous plates. Sometimes these im-
pressions are so fine as to resemble the venation of leaves,
sometimes so large as to simulate trees, and I have even seen
them complicated with shrinkage cracks, the edges of which
were minutely crenulated by little rills running into them from
the surface.
It is further to be noticed that all these markings and im-
pressions on tidal shores may, when covered by succeeding
deposits, appear either in intaglio or relief. On the upper
surface they are of course sunken, but on the lower surface of
the bed deposited on them they are in relief. It often happens
3l8 MARKINGS, FOOTPRINTS AND FL'COIDS
also that these casts in relief are the best preserved. This
arises from the fact that the original moulds or impressions
are usually made in clay, whereas the filling material is sandy,
and the latter, infiltrated with calcareous or siliceous matter,
may become a hard sandstone, while the clay may remain a
comparatively soft shale. This tendency of casts rather than
of moulds to be preserved sometimes produces puzzling effects.
A cylindrical or branching trail thus often assumes the appear-
ance of a stem, and any pits or marginal impressions assume
the form of projections or leaves, and thus a trail of a worm
or Gastropod or a rill mark may easily simulate a plant. It is
to be observed, however, that these prominent casts are on
the under side of the beds, that their material is continuous
with that of the beds to which they belong, and that they are
destitute of any carbonaceous matter. There are, however,
cases where markings may be in relief, even on the upper
surfaces of beds. The following are illustrations of this. Just
as a man walking in newly fallen snow compresses it under his
feet, and if the snow be afterwards drifted away or melted
away by the sun, the compressed part resists longest, and may
appear as a raised footmark, so tracks made on soft material
may consolidate it so that if the soft mud be afterwards washed
away the tracks may remain projecting. Again, worms eject
earthy matter from their burrows, forming mounds, patches or
raised ridges of various forms on the surface, and some animals
burrow immediately under the surface, pushing up the mud
over them into a ridge, while others pile up over their bodies
pellets of clay, forming an archway or tunnel as they go.
Zeiller has shown that the mole cricket forms curious roofed
trails of this kind, and it seems certain that Crustaceans and
marine worms of different kinds execute similar works, and
that their roofed burrows, either entire or fallen in, produce
curious imitations of branches of plants.
The great and multiform army of the sea worms is indeed
MARKINGS, FOOTPRINTS AND FUCOIDS 319
the most prolific source of markings on sea-formed rocks.
Sometimes they cover very large surfaces of these, or penetrate
the beds as perforations, with tortuous furrows, or holes per-
fectly simple, or marked with little stride made by bristles or
minute feet, sometimes with a fringe of little footmarks at
each side, sometimes with transverse furrows indicating the
joints of the animal's body. Multitudes of these markings
have been described and named either as plants or as worm-
tracks. Again, these creatures execute subterranean burrows,
sometimes vertical, sometimes tortuous. These are often
mere cylindrical holes afterwards filled with sand, but some-
times they have been lined with a membranous tube, or with
the rejectamenta of the food of the animals, or with little
fragments of organic matter cemented together. Sometimes
they open on the surface as simple apertures, but again they
may be surrounded with heaps of castings, sometimes spiral
in form, or with dumps of sand produced in their excavation,
and which may assume various forms, according to circum-
stances. Sometimes the aperture is double, so that they seem
to be in pairs. Sometimes, for the convenience of the animal,
the aperture is widened into the form of a funnel, and some-
times the creature, by extending its body and drawing it in,
surrounds its burrow with a series of radiating tracks simulat-
ing the form of a starfish or sea anemone, or of the diverging
branches of a plant.
Creatures of higher grade, provided with jointed limbs,
naturally make their actions known in more complicated ways.
Some years ago I had the pleasure of spending a few weeks
at the favourite sea-side resort of Orchard Beach on the New
England coast, and there made my first acquaintance with that
very ancient and curious creature the Limulus, or Horse-shoe
Crab, or King-crab, as it is sometimes called. Orchard Beach
is, I presume, near its northern range on our coast, and the
specimens seen were not very large in size, though by no means
3-0 MARKINGS, FOOTPRINTS AND FUCOIDS
rar^ and noc fnfreqnentLy cast on shore in storms. But the
best fiicilities for studying their habits were found in a marsh
aE no great distance from the hoteL where there were numerous
rhannelss, ditches and little ponds filled with sea water at high
tide. In these were multitudes of young T.imuli, varying firom
an inch to three or four inches in breadth, and though many
were dead or merely cast shells, it was easy to take young
specimens with a hnding net. A number of these were se-
cured, and I made it my busines for some rime to study their
habits and mode of life, and especially the tracks which they
made in sand or mud.
The King-crabj viewed from above, consists ot three parts.
The antarior shi^dd or carapace is semi-circular in form, with
rs or projecting points at the angles, raised in the
— .md sloping down to a smooth or moderately sharp
edge ra fixtnt- The eyes are set like windows in this shield.
Two large ones at the sides, which are compound eyes con-
ssting of numerous ocelli or little eyes, and two microscopic
oo^ in front, at the base of a little spine, which are simple.
The second : - ' ~ -al part is also in one piece, somewhat
quadrate in :"; : ridges and serratiires at the sides armed
with spines, and which may be said to simulate the separate
- ' ' '- the abdomen of an ordinary Crastacean is
^ : . - : --"d part is a long tail spine, triangular in cross
section, sharply pointed, and so jointed to the posterior end
of the abdomen that it can be freely moved in any direction
as a bayonet-like weapon of defence. "When unable to escape
&«MQ an enetny it is the habit of the creature to double itself
up by be- i'- z ''- : " ' : " " :a against the carapace, and erecting
the shar . . —lih fixed bayonet it awaits attack,
like the kneeimg soldier in froat of a square.
r :' '-•- :-— ;r shield, which is thin and papery in the
jiomy in the adult, are the numerous limbs
-ta:ure. wirfi which we are at present most concerned
MARKINGS, FOOTPRINTS, AND FUCOIDS 32 1
Under the carapace are several pairs of jointed limbs differing
in size and form. The two anterior are small and peculiarly
formed claws, used apparently in manipulating the food. The
four next are larger in size, and are walking feet, each furnished
with two sharp points which form a pincer for holding. The
last pair is much larger and stronger than any of the others, and
armed not only ^yith a pair of pincers, but with four blunt nail-
like points. Under the abdomen are flat swimming feet, as they
have been called, each composed of a broad plate notched and
divided in the middle. When at rest these lie flat on each
other, but they can be flapped back and forth at the will of the
animal.
Let us now see what use the creature can make of these
numerous and varied pedal appendages, and for distinctness'
sake we shall call the anterior set thoracic and the posterior
abdominal. When placed in shallow water on fine sand it
walked slowly forward, and its tracks then consisted of a
number of punctures on the sand in two lines. If, however, the
water was very shallow or the sand very soft or inclined upward
the two edges of the carapace touched the bottom, making a
slight furrow at each side ; and if the tail was trailed on the
bottom, this made a third or central furrow. When climbing a
slope, or when placed at the edge of the water, it adopted
another mode of locomotion, pushing with great force with its
two posterior limbs, and thus moving forward by jerks. It
then made four deep marks with the toes of each hind limb,
and more or less interrupted marks with the edges of the cara-
pace and the tail. In these circumstances the marks were al-
most exactly like those of some forms of the Protichnites of the
Potsdam sandstone. When in sufficiently deep water and de-
sirous to escape, it flapped its abdominal feet, and then swam
or glided close to the bottom. In this case, when moving near
the soft bottom, it produced a series of transverse ridges and
furrows like small ripple marks, with a slight ridge in the middle.
5--^
MARKING?, FOOTPRINTS AND FUCOIDS
and sometimes, when the edges of the carapace touched the
bottom, with lateral furrows. In this way the animals were
able to swim with some ease and rapidity, and on one occasion
I observed an individual, confined in a tub of water, raise itself
from the bottom and swim around the tub at the surface in
search of a way of escape. Lastly, the young Limuli were fond
of hiding themselves by burrowing in the sand. They did this
by pushing the anterior rounded end of the carapace under the
sand, and then vigorously shoveUing out the material from below
with their feet, so that they gradually sank under the surface,
and the sand flowed in upon them till they were entirely covered.
If carefully removed from the hollow they had made, this was
found to be ovoid or hoof shaped in form and bilobed, not un-
like the curious hollows {Riisophycus Grenvillensis of Billings)
which I have supposed to be burrows of Trilobites.
I thus found that the common King-crab could produce a
considerable variety of tracks and burrows comparable with
those which have been named Protichnites, Climactichnites,
Bilobites, Cruziana, Rusichnites, etc. ; and that the kind of
markings depended partly on the differences of gait in the
animal, and partly on the circumstances in which it was placed ;
so that different kinds of tracks do not always prove diversity
in the animals producing them.
The interest of this investigation as applied to Limulus is
increased by the fact that this creature is the near ally of
Trilobites, Eurypterids and other Crustaceans which were
abundant in the earlier geological ages, and whose footprints
are probably among the most common we find on the rocks.
Lastly, on this part of the subject, it is to be observed that
many other marine animals, both crustaceans and worms, make
impressions resembling in general character those of Limulus.
In addition to those already mentioned, Nathorst and Bureau
have shown that various kinds of shrimps and lobster-like
Crustaceans, when swimming rapidly by successive strokes ot
Ru-siciiNiTES Grenvii.lensis, Uillings— a " IJilobiu
Probably the Cast of a Crustacean bunow .
MARKINGS, FOOTPRINTS AND FUCOIDS 323
the tail, make double furrows with transverse ridges resembling
those of Bilobites, and there are even some moUusks which by
the undulations of the foot or the hook-like action of its an-
terior part, can make similar trails. A question arises here as
to the value of such things as fossils. This depends on the fact
that many creatures have left their marks on the rocks when
still soft on the sea bottom, of which we have no other indica-
tions, and it also depends on our ability to understand the
import of these unconscious hieroglyphics. They will certainly
be of little use to us so long as we persist in regarding them as
vegetable forms, and until we have very carefully studied all
kinds of modern markings. ^ Nor does it seem of much use to
assign to them specific names. The same trail often changes
from one so-called species, or even genus, to another in tracing
it along, and the same animal may in different circumstances
make very different kinds of tracks. There will eventually,
perhaps, arise some general kind of nomenclature for these
markings under a separate sub-science of Ichnology or the doc-
trine of Footprints.
I have said nothing of true Algs or seaweeds, of which there
are many fossil species known to us by their forms, and also
by the carbonaceous or pyritous matter, or discharge of colour
from the matrix, which furnishes evidence of the presence
of organic material ; nor of the marks and trails left by sea-
weeds and land plants drifting in currents, some of which are
very curious and fantastic ; nor of those singular trails referred
to the arms of cuttlefishes and the fins of fishes, or to sea
jellies and starfishes. These might form n-saterials for a
treatise. My object here is merely to indicate the mode of
dealing with such things, and the kind of information to be
derived from them.
When we come to the consideration of actual footprints of
^ Geologists are greatly indebted to Dr. Nathorst of Stockholm for his
]iainstaln\T/mofns), a densely tufted mountain shruK with
448 ALPINE AND ARCTIC PLANTS
hard glossy leaves, that look as if constructed to brave ex-
tremest hardships. It is found on the mountains of Norway,
at the height of 3,550 feet on the Scottish hills, according to
Watson, and according to Fuchs, at the height of 7,000 feet in
the milder climate of the Venetian Alps. In America it is
found in Newfoundland, in Labrador, at 4,000 feet on jMount
Albert, Gaspe,' and in the barren grounds from lat. 65" to the
extreme Arctic islands. Gray does not mention its occurrence
elsewhere in the United States than the summits of the ^^'hite
Mountains. A member of the same family of the heaths, the
yew-leaved phyllodoce {F. tnxifolia), presents a still more
singular distribution. It is found on all the higher mountains
of New England and New York, and occurs also on the moun-
tains of Scotland and Scandinavia, but its only known station
in northern America is, according to Hooker, in Labrador.
As many as nine or ten of the Alpine plants of the White
Mountains belong to the order of the Heaths {Ericacece).
Another example from this order is Rhododendron Lapponiciim,
a northern European species, as its name indicates, and scat-
tered over all the high mountains of New England and New
York, occurring also in Labrador, on the Arctic sea coasts, and
the northern part of the Rocky Mountains, and at 4,000 feet .
on Mount Albert, Gaspe (Macoun).
It would be tedious to refer in detail to more of these plants,
hut I must notice two herbaceous species belonging to differ-
ent families, but resembling each other in size and habit — the
Alpine epilobium {E. alpiniim or ahinefolium), and the Alpine
.speedwell ( /vnw/W? alpina). Both are in the United States
confined to the highest mountain tops. Both occur as alpine
northern plants in Europe, being found on the Alps, on the
Scottish Highlands, and in Scandinavia. Both are found in
Labrador and on the Reeky Mountains, and the J'eronica ex-
' >'aco'.in.
ALPINE AND ARCTIC PLANTS 449
tends as far as Greenland. The Alpine epilobium is one of the
few White Mountain plants that have attained the bad emi-
nence of being regarded as doubtful species. Gray notes as
the typical form, that with obtuse and nearly entire leaves, and
as a variety, that with acute and slightly toothed leaves, which
some other botanists seem to regard as distinct specifically.
Thus we find that this little plant has been induced to assume
a suspicious degree of variability ; yet it is strange that both
species or varieties are found growing together, as if the little
peculiarities in the form of the leaves were matters of indiffer-
ence, and not induced by any dire necessities in the struggle
for life. Facts of this kind are curious, and not easily explained
under the supposition either of specific unity or diversity. For
why should this plant vary without necessity ? and why should
two species so much alike be created for the same locality ?
Perhaps these two species or varieties, wandering from far
distant points of origin, have met here fortuitously, while the
lines of migration have been cut off by geological changes ; and
yet the points of difference are too constant to be removed,
even after the reason for them has disappeared. If this could
be proved, it would afford a strong reason for believing the
existence of a real specific diversity in these plants.
I have said nothing of the grasses and sedges of these moun-
tains ; but one of them deserves a special notice. It is the
Alpine herd's grass {Phleum alpinum), a humble relation of our
common herd's grass. This plant not only occurs on the
White Mountains, in Arctic America, in the Canadian Moun-
tains, from the summit of Mount Albert, in Gaspe, to the
mountains of British Columbia, and on the hills of Scotland
and Scandinavia, but has been found on the Mexican Cordil-
lera and at the Straits of Magellan. The seeds of this giass
may perhaps be specially suited for transportation by water, as
well as by land. It is observed in Nova Scotia that when the
wide flats of mud deposited by the tides of the Bay of Fundy,
450 ALPINE AND ARCTIC PLANTS
are dyked in from the sea, they soon become covered with
grasses and carices, the seeds of which are supposed to be
washed down by streams and mingled with the marine silt ;
and fragments of grasses abound in the Post-tertiary clays of
the Ottawa.
It seems almost ridiculous thus to connect the persistence ot
the form of a little plant with the subsidence and elevation of
whole continents, and the lapse of enormous periods of time.
Yet the Power which preserves unchanged from generation to
generation the humblest animal or plant, is the same with that
which causes the permanence of the great laws of physical
nature, and the continued revolutions of the earth and all its
companion spheres. A little leaf, entombed ages on ages ago
in the Pleistocene clays of Canada, preserves in all its minutest
features the precise type of that of the same species as it now
lives, after all the prodigious geological changes that have
intervened. An Arctic and Alpine plant that has survived all
these changes maintains, in its now isolated and far removed
stations, all its specific characters unchanged. The flora of a
mountain top is precisely what it must have been when it was
an island in the glacial seos. These facts relate not to hard
crystalline rocks that remain unaltered from age to age, but to
little delicate organisms that have many thousands of times
died and been renewed in the lapse of time. They show us
that Avhat we call a species represents a decision of the un-
changing creative will, and that the group of qualities which
constitutes our idea of the species goes on from generation to
generation animating new organisms constructed out of difter-
ent particles of matter, 'i'lie individual dies, but the species
lives, and will live until the Power that has decreed its creation
shall have decreed its extinction ; or until, in the slow process
of physical change depending on another section of His laws,
it shall have been excluded from the jiossibility of existence
anywhere en the surface of the rarih, unless we suppose with
ALPINE AND ARCTIC PLANTS 45 I
modern evolutionists that there is a possibility of these plants
so changing their characters that in the lapse of ages they might
appear to us to be distinct specific types. The fact, however,
that the Arctic species have migrated around the whole Arctic
circle, and have advanced southward and retreated to the north,
again and again, without changing their constitutions or forms,
augurs for" them at least a remarkable fixity as well as con-
tinuity.
^Vhile the huge ribs of mother earth that project into moun-
tain summits, and the grand and majestic movement of the
creative processes by which they have been formed, speak to
us of the majesty of Him to whom the sea belongs, and whose
hand formed the dry land, the continuance of these little plants
preaches the same lessons of humble faith in the Divine pro-
mises and laws, which our Lord drew from the lilies of the
field.
It is suggestive, in connection with the antiquity and migra-
tions of these plants, to consider the differences in this respect
of some closely allied species of the same genera. Of the
blueberries that grow on the White Mountains, one species,
Vacciniuni uliginosum, is found in Behring's Straits and
very widely in Arctic and boreal America,^ also in northern
Europe. V. ccespitosum has a wide northern range in America,
but is not European. V. Peniisy/vaiiiciait and V. Caiia-
deiise, from their geographical distribution, do not seem to
belong to the Arctic flora at all, but to be of more southern
origin. The two bearberries {Arctostaphylos uvn-iirsi and
alpifia) occur together on the White Hills, and on the Scottish
and Scandinavian mountains : but the former is a plant of
much wider and more southern distribution in America than
the latter. Two of the dwarf willows of the White Mountains
[Sa/ix repcns and .S'. herbacea) are European as well as
' Macouii, Catalogue of Canadian plants.
452 ALPINE AND ARCTIC PLANTS
American, but S. uva-ursi seems to be confined to America.
Rubus trifloriis, the dwarf raspberry, and R. cha??iaemorus, the
cloud berry, cUmb about equally high on Mount Washington ;
but the former is exclusively American, and ranges pretty far
southward, while the latter extends no farther south than the
northern coast of Maine, and is distributed all around the
Arctic regions of the Old and New ^^'orlds. It is to be
observed, however, that the former can thrive on rich and
calcareous soils, while the latter loves those that are barren
and granitic ; but it is nevertheless probable that R. triflorus
belongs to a later and more local flora. Similar reasons would
induce the belief that the American dwarf cornel or pigeon-
berry {Cor?iiis Canade?isis), whose distribution is solely Ameri-
can, and not properly Arctic, is of later origin than the C.
Suecica,'^ which occurs in northern America locally, and is ex-
tensively distributed in northern Europe.
I can but glance at such points as these ; but they raise great
questions which are to be worked out, not merely by the patient
collection of facts, but by a style of scientific thought very
much above those which, on the one hand, escape such prob-
lems by the supposition of multiplied centres of creation, or
on the other, render their solution worthless by confounding
races due to external disturbing causes with species originally
distinct. Difficulties of various kinds are easily evaded by
either of these extreme views ; but with the fact before him of
specific diversity and its manifestly long continuance, on the
one hand, and the remarkable migrations of some species on
the other, the true naturalist must be content to work out the
problerns presented to him with the data afforded by the actual
observation of nature, following carefully the threads of guid-
' I have found C. Stwcica growing along witli C. Caiiai/ciisis in shaded
and northern exposures on the south side of the St. Lawrence, near Ca-
conna and Metis. Its seeds may have been brought over from Labrador
by migratory birds.
ALPINE AND ARCTIC PLANTS 453
ance thus indicated, not rudely breaking them by too hasty
generalizations.
But it is time to leave the scientific teachings of our little
Alpine friends, and to inquire if they can teach anything to the
heart as well as to the head.
The mountains themselves, heaving their huge sides to the
heavens, speak of forces in comparison with which all human
power is nothing ; and we can scarcely look upon them in their
majesty without a psalm of praise rising up within us to Him
who made the sea, and from whose hands the dry land took
its form. As we ascend them, and as our vision ranges more
and more widely over the tops of wooded hills, along the
courses of streams, over cultivated valleys, and to the shores
of the blue sea itself, our mental vision widens too. We think
that the great roots of these hills run beneath a whole con-
tinent, that their tops look down on the wide St. Lawrence
plain, on the beautiful valleys of New England, and on the
rice fields of the sunny south. We are reminded of the bro-
therhood of man, which overleaps all artificial boundaries, and
should cause us to pray that throughout their whole extent
these hills may rise amidst a happy, a free, and a God-fearing
people.
Our Alpine plants have still higher lessons to teach. They
are fitting emblems of that little flock, scattered everywhere,
yet one in heart, and in all lands having their true citizenship
in heaven. They tell us that it is the humble who are nearest
God, and they ask why we should doubt the guardian care of
the Father who cares for them. They witness, too, of the lowly
and hidden ones who may inhabit the barren and lowly spots
of earth, yet are special subjects of God's love, as they should
be of ours. We may thus read in the Alpine plants truths that
beget deeper faith in God, and closer brotherhood with His
people.
The history of these plants has also a strange significance.
454 ALPINE AND ARCTIC PLANTS
It might have been written of them, " Though the dry land be
removed out of its place, and the mountains cast into the midst
of the sea, yet the Lord will not forsake the work of His
hands " ; for this has been literally their history. In this they
hold forth an omen of hope to the people of God in that once
happy land through which these hills extend, and who now
mourn the evil times on which they have fallen. The moun-
tain plants may teach them that though the floods of strife
should rise even to the tops of the hills, and leave but scattered
islets to mark the place of a united land, their rock is sure, and
their prayers will prevail.^ The power that has waked the storm
is after all their Father's hand. For years a cry has risen high
above these hills : the cry of the bondman who has reaped the
fields and received no hire. That cry is sure to be heard in
heaven, whatever other prayers may go unanswered. An apostle
tells us that it enters directly into the ears of the God of
Sabaoth, and is potent to call down the day of slaughter on
the proud ones of earth. The prayer of the slave has been
answered ; and the tempest is abroad, sweeping away his
oppressors and their abettors. Yet God rules in all this, and
those whom He has chosen will be spared, even like the hardy
plants of the hill tops, to look again on a renewed and smiling
land, from which many monsters and shapes of dread have for
ever passed away.
But last of all, the Alpine flowers have a lesson that should
come near to all of us individually. They tell us how well
natural law is observed, as compared with moral. Obeying with
unchanging fidelity the law of their creation, they have meekly
borne the cold and storms of thousands of winters, yet have
thankfully expanded their bosoms to the returning sun of every
summer, and have not once forgot to open their tiny buds, and
bring forth flowers and fruit, doing thus their little part to the
' This paper was oiiginally written at tlic time wlien tlie Anicriean Civil
War was racinp-.
ALPINE AND ARCTIC PLANTS 455
glory of their Maker and ours. How would the moral wastes
of earth rejoice and be glad, did the sunshine of God's daily
favours evoke a similar response from every human heart !
References: — Paper on Destruction and Renewal of Forests in North
America, Edinburgh PhilosopJiical Journal, 1847-8. Alpine and
Arctic Plants, Canadian Naturalist, 1862. "The Geological History
of Plants," International Scientific Series, 2nd edition, 1891. "The
Pleistocene Flora of Canada," Dawson and Penhallow, BuUetin,
American Geological Society, 1890. Papers on Pleistocene Climate
of Canada, Canxdian Naturalist, 1S57 to 1890.
EARLY MAN.
DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF THE LATE
SIR DANIEL WILSON, LL.D., F.R.S.E.,
a dear and valued priend,
and one of the most eminent and judicious students of
Pre-historic Man both in Europe and America.
Summary of the Story of Early Man — Classification
OF Tertiary Time — Probabilities as to the Intro-
duction OF Man — The Anthropic Age as distin-
guished from the Pleistocene — Its Division into
Palanthropic and Neanthropic — Sketches of Palan-
thropic Man and his Immediate Successors
Four Pre-historic Skulls, (p. 472.)
Outer outline, Cromagno7t ; second, Engis ; third, Camtsfadt ; fourth,
Canadian Hochelagan on smaller scale.
CHAPTER XVII.
EARLY MAN.
THE science of the earth has its culmination and terminus
in man ; and at this, the most advanced of our salient
points, as we look back on the long process of the development
of the earth, we may well ask. Was the end worthy of the
means ? We may well have doubts as to an affirmative
answer if we do not consider that the means were perfect,
each in its own time, and that man, the final link in the chain
of life, is that which alone takes hold of the unseen and
eternal. He alone can comprehend the great plan, and appre-
ciate its reason and design. Without his agency in this respect
nature would have been a riddle without any solution — a
column without a capital, a tree without fruit. Besides this,
even science may be able to perceive that man may be not
merely the legatee of all the ages that lie behind, but the heir
of the eternity that lies before, the only earthly being that
has implanted in him the germ and instinct of immortality.
Whatever view we may take of these questions, it is of inter-
est to us to know, if possible, how and when this chief corner
stone was placed upon the edifice of nature, and what are the
])recise relations of man to the later geological ages, as well as
to the present order of nature, of which he is at once a part,
and its ruler and head. Let us put this first in the form of a
narrative based on geological facts only, and then consider
some of its details and relations to history.
The Glacial age had passed away. The lower land, in great
part a bare expanse of mud, sand, and gravel, had risen from
s, E. «' 33
46o EARLY MAN
the icy ocean in which it had been submerged, and most of the
mountain tops had lost their covering of perennial snow and
ice. 'J'he climate was ameliorated, and the sun again shone
warmly on the desolate earth. Gradually the new land became
overspread with a rich vegetation, and was occupied by many
large animals. There were species of elephant, rhinoceros,
hippopotamus, horse, bison, ox and deer, multiplying till the
plains and river valleys were filled with their herds, in spite of
the fact that they were followed by formidable carnivorous
beasts fitted to prey on them. At this time, somewhere in the
warm temperate zone, in an oasis or island of fertility, appeared
a new thing on the earth, a man and woman walking erect in
the forest glades, bathing in the waters, gathering and tasting
every edible fruit, watching with curious and inquiring eyes
the various animals around them, and giving them names
which might eventually serve not merely to designate their
kinds, but to express actions and emotions as well. When,
where, and how did this new departure, fraught with so many
possibilities, occur — introducing as it did the dexterous fingers
and inventive mind of Man upon the scene ? The last of
these, questions science is still unable to answer, and though
we may frame many hypotheses, they all remain destitute of
certain proof in so iar as natural science is concerned. A\"e
can here only fall back on the old traditional and historical
monuments of our race, and believe that man, the child of
God, and with God-like intellect, will, and consciousness, was
placed by his Maker in an Edenic region, and commissioned to
multiply and replenish the earth. The when and where of his
introduction, and his early history when introduced, are more
open to scientific investigation.
That man was originally frugivorous, his whole structure
testifies. That he originated in some favourable climate and
fertile land is equally certain, and that his surroundings must
liave been of such a nature as to give him immunity from the
EARLY MAN 46 1
attacks of formidable beasts of prey, also goes without saying.
These are all necessary conditions of the successful introduc-
tion of such a creature as man, and theories which suppose
him to have originated in a cold climate, to struggle at once
with the difficulties and dangers of such a position, are, from a
scientific point of view, incredible.
But man was introduced into a wide and varied world, more
wide and varied than that possessed by his modern descend-
ants. The earliest men that we certainly know inhabited out
continents in the second Continental age of the Kainozoic
Period, when, as we know from ample geological evidence, the
land of the northern hemisphere was much more extensive
than at present, with a mild climate, and a rich flora and fauna.
If he was ambitious to leave the oasis of his origin the way
was open to him, but at the expense of becoming a toiler, an
inventor, and a feeder on animal food, more especially when he
should penetrate into the colder climates. The details of all
this, as they actually occurred, are not within the range of scien-
tific investigation, for these early men must have left few, if any,
monuments ; but we can imagine some of them. Man's hands
were capable of other uses than the mere gathering of fruit.
His mind was not an instinctive machine, like that of lower
animals, but an imaginative and inventive intellect, capable of
adapting objects to new uses peculiar to himself. A fallen
branch would enable him to obtain the fruits that hung higher
than his hands could reach, a pebble would enable him to
break a nut too hard for his teeth. He could easily weave a
few twigs into a rough basket to carry the fruit he had gathered
to the cave or shelter, or spreading tree, or rough hut that
served him for a home ; and when he had found courage to
snatch a brand from some tree, ignited by lightning, or by the
friction of dry branches, and to kindle a fire for himself, he had
fairly entered on that path of invention and discovery which
has enabled him to achieve so many conquests over nature.
462 EARLY MAN
Our imagination may carry us yet a little farther with reference
to his fortunes. If he needed any weapon to repel aggressive
enemies, a stick or club would serve his purpose, or perhaps a
stone thrown from his hand,.' Soon, however, he might learn
from the pain caused by the sharp flints that lay in his path the
cutting power of an edge, and, armed with a flint chip held
in the hand, or fitted into a piece of wood, he would become
an artificer of many things useful and pleasing. As he wan-
dered into more severe climates, where vegetable food could
not be obtained throughout the year, and as he observed the
habits of beasts and birds of prey, he would learn to be
a hunter and a fisherman, and to cook animal food ; and with
this would come new habits, wants and materials, as well as a
more active and energetic mode of life. He would also have
to make new weapons and implements, axes, darts, harpoons,
and scrapers for skins, and bodkins or needles to make skin
garments. He would use chipped flint where this could be
procured, and failing this, splintered and rubbed slate, and for
some uses, bone and antler. Much ingenuity would be used
in shaping these materials, and in the working of bone, antler
and wood, ornament would begin to be studied. In the mean-
time the hunter, though his weapons improved, would become
a ruder and more migratory man, and in anger, or in the desire
to gain some coveted object, might begin to use his weapons
against his brother man. In some more favoured localities,
however, he might attain to a more settled life ; and he, or more
likely the woman his helpmeet, might contrive to tame some
species of animals, and to begin some culture of the soil.
It was probably in this early time that metals first attracted
the attention of men. The ages of stone, bronze, and
iron believed in by some arch^ologists, are more or less
mythical to the geologist, who knows that these things depend
more on locality and on natural products than on stages of
culture. The analogy of America teaches us that the use of
EARLY MAN 463
different metals may be contemporaneous, provided that they
can be obtained in a native state. At the time of the dis-
covery of America the Esquimaux were using native iron,
which, though rare in most parts of the world, is not uncom-
mon in some rocks of Greenland. The people of the region
of the great lakes, and of the valleys of the Mississippi and
Ohio, were using native copper from Lake Superior for similar
purposes. Gold was apparendy the only metal among the
natives of Central America. The people of Peru had invented
bronze, or had brought the knowledge of it with them from
beyond the sea. Thus the Peruvians were in the bronze age,
the Mexicans and Mound builders in the copper age, and the
Esquimaux in the iron age, while at the same time the
greater part of the aboriginal tribes were at one and the same
time in the ages of chipped and polished stone and in these
ages what have been called paleolithic and neolothic weapons
were contemporaneous, the former being most usually unfinished
examples of the latter, or extemporized tools roughly made in
emergencies.! How long this had lasted, or how long it would
have continued, had not Europeans introduced from abroad an
iron age, we do not know. It was probably the same in other
parts of the world, in pre-historic times. In any case, the dis-
covery of native metals must have occurred very early. ISIen
searching in the beds of streams for suitable pebbles to form
hammers and other implements, would find nuggets of gold
and copper, and the properties of these, so different from those
of other pebbles, would at once attract attention, and lead to
useful applications. Native iron is of rarer occurrence, but in
certain localities would also be found.'- It must have been
1 "Fossil Men," by llie Aullior. \V. II. Holmes, " Americin Anthro-
pologist," 1890.
^ The rarity of native iron, whether meteoric or telluric, and its rapid
decay by rusting, suft'iciently account for its absence in deposits where im-
plements of stone and bone have been preserved.
464 EARLY MAN
experiments on these ores, which resemble the native metals in
colour, lustre and weight, that led to the first attempts at smelt-
ing metals, and these must have occurred at a very early
period. Yet for ages the metals must have been extremely
scarce, and we know that in comparatively modern times civil-
ized nations like the Egyptians were using flint flakes after they
had domesticated many animals, had become skilful agricultu-
rists and artisans, and had executed great architectural works.
Probably all these ends had been to some extent, and in
some localities, attained in the earliest human period, when
man was contemporary with many large animals now extinct,
l>ut a serious change was to occur in human prospects,
'inhere is the best geological evidence that in the northern
hemisphere the mild climate of the earlier Post-glacial period
relapsed into comparative coldness, though not so extreme as
that of the preceding Glacial age. Hill tops, long denuded of
the snow and ice of the Glacial period, were again covered, and
cold winters sealed up the lakes and rivers, and covered the
ground with wintry snows of long continuance, and with this
came a cliange in animal lite and in human habits. The old
southern elephant {E. antiqiiiis), the southern rhinoceros {E.
leptorhinns), and the river hippopotamus (//. niajo/-), which
had been contemporaries, in Europe at least, of primitive man,
retired from the advancing cold, and ultimately perished,
while their places were taken by the hairy mammoth {E.
/'/i/ziii^i'/iii/s), the woolly rhinoceros (A^ iichorJiimis), the rein-
deer, and even the musk ox. Now began a fierce struggle for
existence in the more northern districts inhabited by man — a
struggle in which only the hardier and ruder races could sur-
vive, except, perhaps, in some of the more genial portions of
the warm temperate zone. Men had to become almost wholly
carnivorous, and had to contend with powerful and fierce
animals. Tribe contended with tribe for the possession of the
most productive and sheltered habitats. Thus the struggle
EARLY MAN 46;
with nature became aggravated by that between man and man.
Violence disturbed the progress of civih'zation, and favoured
the increase and power of the rudest tribes, while the more deli-
cately organized and finer types of humanity, if they continued
to exist in some favoured spots, were in constant danger of
being exterminated by their fiercer and stronger contemporaries.
In mercy to humanity, this state of things was terminated
by a great physical revolution, the last great subsidence of the
continents — that Post-glacial flood, which must have swept
away the greater part of men, and many species of great beasts,
and left only a few survivors to re-people the world, just as the
mammoth and other gigantic animals had to give place to
smaller and feebler creatures. In these vicissitudes it seemed
determined, with reference to man, that the more gigantic and
formidable races should perish, and that one of the finer types
should survive to re-people the world.
The age of which we have been writing the history, is that
which has been fitly named the Anthropic, in that earlier part
of it preceding the great diluvial catastrophe, which has fixed
itself in all the earlier traditions of men, and which separates
what may be called the Palanthropic or Antediluvian age from
the Neanthroj)ic or Postdiluvian. Independently altogether of
human history, these are two geological ages distinguished by
different physical conditions and different species of animals ;
and the time has undoubtedly come when all the speculations
of archaeologists respecting early man must be regulated by
these great geological facts, which are stamped upon those later
deposits of the crust of the earth, which have been laid down
since man was its inhabitant. If they have only recently as-
sumed their proper place in the geological chronology, this is
due to the great difficulty in the case of the more recent
deposits in establishing their actual succession and relations to
each other. These difficulties have, however, been overcome,
and new facts are constantly being obtained to render our
466 EARLY MAN
knowledge more definite. Lest, however, the preceding sketch
of the Palanthropic age — that in which gigantic men were con-
temporaries of a gigantic fauna now extinct — should be re-
garded as altogether fanciful, we may proceed to consider the
geological facts and classification as actually ascertained.
The Tertiary or Kainozoic period, the last of the four great
" times " into which the earth's geological history is usually
divided, and that to which man and the mammalia belong,
was ingeniously subdivided by Lyell, on the ground of per-
centages of marine shells and other invertebrates of the sea.
According to this method, which with some modification in
details is still accepted, the Eocene, or dawn of the recent,
includes those formations in which the percentage of modern
species of marine animals does not exceed 3^, all the other
species found being extinct. The Miocene (less recent) in-
cludes formations in which the percentage of living species
does not exceed 35, and the Pliocene (more recent) contains
formations having more than 35 per cent, of recent species.
To these three may be added the Pleistocene, in which the
great majority of the species are recent, and the Modern or
Anthropic, in which we are still living. Dawkins and (iaudry
give us a division substantially the same with Lyell's, except
that they prefer to take the evidence of the higher animals
instead of the marine shells. The Eocene thus includes those
formations in which there are remains of mammals or ordinary
land quadrupeds, but none of these belong to recent species
or genera, though they may be included in the same families
and orders with the recent mammals. This is a most im-
portant fact, as we shall see, and the only exception to it is
that Gaudry and others hold that a few living genera, as those
of the dog, civet, and marten, are actually found in the later
Eocene. The Miocene, on the same mammalian evidence,
will include formations in which there are living genera of
mammals, but no species which survive to the present time.
EARLY MAN 467
The Pliocene and Pleistocene show living species, though in
the former these are very few and exceptional, while in the
latter they become the majority.
With regard to the geological antiquity of man, no geologist
expects to find any human remains in beds older than the
Tertiary, because in the older periods the conditions of the
world do not seem to have been suitable to man, and because
in these periods no animals nearly akin to man are known.
On entering into the Eocene Tertiary we fail in like manner to
find any human remains ; and we do not expect to find any,
because no living species and scarcely any living genera of
mammals are known in the Eocene ; nor do we find in it
remains of any of the animals, as the anthropoid apes, for in-
stance, most nearly allied to man. In the Miocene the case is
somewhat different. Here we have living genera at least, and
we have large species of apes ; but no remains of man have
been discovered, if we except some splinters of flint found in
beds of this age at Thenay, in France, and some notched
bones. Supposing these objects to have been chipped or
notched by animals, which is by no means certain in the case
of the flints, the question remains, Was this done by man ?
Gaudry and Dawkins prefer to suppose that the artificer was
one of the anthropoid apes of the period. It is true that no
apes are known to do such work now ; but then other animals,
as beavers and birds, are artificers, and some extinct animals
were of higher powers than their modern representatives. But
if there were Miocene apes which chipped flints and cut bones,
this would, either on the hypothesis of evolution or that of
creation by law, render the occurrence of man still less likely
than if there were no such apes. The scratched and notched
bones, on the other hand, indicate merely the gnawing of sharks
or other carnivorous animals. For these reasons neither Daw-
kins nor Gaudry, nor indeed any geologists of authority in the
Tertiary fauna, believe in Miocene man.
468 EARLY MAN
In the Pliocene, though the facies of the mammahan fauna
of Europe becomes more modern, and a few modern species
occur, the chmate becomes colder, and in consequence the
apes disappear, so that the chances of finding fossil men are
lessened rather than increased in so far as the temperate
regions are concerned. In Italy, however, Capellini has de-
scribed a skull, an implement, and a notched bone supposed
to have come from Pliocene beds. To this it may be objected
that the skull — which I examined in 1883 in the museum at
Florence — and the implement are of recent type, and probably
mixed with the Pliocene stuff by some slip of the ground. As
the writer has elsewhere pointed out,^ similar and apparently
fatal objections apply to the skull and implements alleged to
have been found in Pliocene gravels in California. Dawkins
further informs us that in the Italian Pliocene beds supposed
to hold remains of man, of twenty-one mammalia whose bones
occur, all are extinct species, except possibly one, a hippo-
])otamus. This, of course, renders very unlikely in a geological
point of view the occurrence of human remains in these beds.
In the Pleistocene deposits of Europe — and this applies also
to America — we for the first time find a predominance of
recent species of land animals. Here, therefore, we may look
with some hope for remains of man and his works, and here,
in the later Pleistocene, or the early Modern, they are actually
found. When we speak, however, of Pleistocene man, there
arise some questions as to the classification of the deposits,
which it seems to the writer Dawkins and other Ikitish geolo-
gists have not answered in accordance with geological facts,
and a misunderstanding as to which may lead to serious error.
They have extended the term Pleistocene over that Post-glacial
period in which we find remains of man, and thus have split
the " Anthropic " period into two ; and they proceed to divide
the latter part of it into the Pre-historic and Historic periods,
' " l\)ssil Men,"" iSSo.
EARLY MAN ■ 469
whereas the name Pleistocene should not be extended to the
Post-glacial age. The close of the Glacial period, introducing
great physical and climatal changes, some new species of
mammalia and man himself, should be regarded as the end of
the Pleistocene, and the introduction of what some French
geologists have called the Aiithropic period, which I have else-
where divided into Palanthropic, corresponding to the so-called
Palnsolithic age, and Neanthropic, corresponding to the later
stone and metal ages.^ These may be termed respectively the
earlier and later stages of the Modern period as distinguished
from the Pleistocene Tertiary.
In point of logical arrangement, and especially of geological
classification, the division into historic and pre-historic periods
is decidedly objectionable. Even in Europe the historic age
of the south is altogether a different thing from that of the
north, and to speak of the pre-historic period in Greece and in
Britain or Norway as indicating the same portion of time is
altogether illusory. Hence a large portion of the discussion of
this subject has to be properly called " the overlap of history."
Further, the mere accident of the presence or absence of his-
torical documents cannot constitute a geological period com-
parable with such periods as the Pleistocene and Pliocene, and
the assumption of such a criterion of time merely confuses our
ideas. On the one hand, while the whole Tertiary or Kaino-
zoic, up to the present day, is one great geological period,
characterized by a continuous though gradually changing fauna
and series of physical conditions, and there is consequently
no good basis for setting apart, as some geologists do, a
Quaternary as distinct from the Tertiary period ; on the other
hand, there is a distinct physical break between the Pliocene
and the Modern in the great Glacial age. This, in its Arctic
climate and enormous submergence of the land, though it
did not exterminate the fauna of the northern hemisphere,
* " Modern Science in Bible Lands."
470 EARLY MAN
greatly reduced it, and at the close of this age some new forms
came in. For this reason the division between the Pleistocene
and Anthropic ages should be made at the beginning of the
Post-glacial age. The natural division would thus be : — -
I. Pleistocene, including —
(a) Early Pleistocene, or first continental period. Land
very extensive, moderate climate. This passes into the pre-
ceding Pliocene.
{b) Later F/eistocene, or glacial, including Dawkins' " Mid
Pleistocene." In this there was a great prevalence of cold and
glacial conditions, and a great submergence of the northern
land.
II. Anthropic, or period of man and modern mammals,
including —
{a) Palanthropic, Post-glacial, or second continental period,
in which the land was again very extensive, and Paleocosmic
man was contemporary with some great mammals, as the
mammoth, now extinct, and the area of land in the northern
hemisphere was greater than at present. This includes a later
cold period, not equal in intensity to that of the Glacial period
proper, and was terminated by a great and very general subsi-
dence, accompanied by the disappearance of Paleocosmic man
and some large mammalia, and which may be identical with
the historical deluge.
(/>) N^eanthropic or Recent, when the continents attained their
present levels, existing races of men colonized I^uropc, and
living species of mammals. This includes botli the Pre-
historic and Historic periods.
On geological grounds tlie above should clearly be our
arrangement, though of course there need be no objection to
such other subdivisions as historians and antiquarians may find
desirable for their pur[)oscs. On this classification the earliest
certain indications of the presence of man in Europe, Asia, or
America, so far as yet knoivn, belong to the Modern or Anthropic
EARLY MAN 47 I
period alone. That man may have existed previously no one
need deny, but no one can at present positively affirm on any
ground of actual fact. It may be necessary here to explain
the contentions often made that in Britain and Western Europe
man belongs to an interglacial period. When with Dr. James
Geikie, the great Scottish glacialist, we hold that there were
several interglacial periods, the Glacial age may be extended
by including the warm period of the Palanthropic, and the cold
at its termination, as one of the interglacial and Glacial periods.
In this way, as a matter of classification, man appears in the
latest Interglacial periods. This, however, as above stated, I
regard as an error in arrangement ; but it makes no practical
difference as to the facts.
Inasmuch, however, as the human remains of the Post-glacial
epoch are those of fully developed men of high type, it may be
said, and has often been said, that man in sorhe lower stage of
development 7nust have existed at a far earlier period. That
is, he must, if certain theories as to his evolution from lower
animals are to be sustained. This, however, is not a mode of
reasoning in accordance with the methods of science. When
facts fail to sustain certain theories we are usually in the habit
of saying " so much the worse for the theories," not " so much
the worse for the facts," or at least we claim the right to hold
our judgment in suspense till some confirmatory facts are forth-
coming.
We have now to inquire as to the actual nature of the indi-
cations of man in Europe and Western Asia at the close of the
Glacial or Pleistocene period. These are principally such of
his tools or weapons as could escape decay when embedded in
river gravels, or in the earth and stalagmite o( caverns or rock
shelters, or buried with his bones in caves of sepulture. \'ery
valuable accessory fossils are the broken bones of the animals
he has used as food. Most valuable, and rarest of all, are well-
preserved human skulls and skeletons. Some doubt may attach
472 EARLY MAN
to mere flint flakes, in tlie absence of other remains ; but the
other indications above referred to are indisputable, and when
proper precautions are taken to notice the succession of beds,
and to eUminate the effects of any later disturbance of the de-
posits, human fossils become as instructive and indisputable as
any others.
When the whole of the facts thus available are put together,
we find that the earliest men of whom we have osseous remains,
and who, undoubtedly, inhabited Europe and Western Asia in
the second continental period, before the establishment of the
present geography, and before the disappearance of the mam-
moth and its companions, were of two races or subraces, agree-
ing in certain respects, differing in others. Both have long or
dolichocephalic heads, and seem to have been men of great
strength and muscular energy, with somewhat coarse counte-
nances of Mongolian type, and they seem to have been of
roving habits, living as hunters and fishermen in a semi-barbar-
ous condition, but showing some artistic skill and taste in their
carvings on bone and other ornaments.
-The earliest of the two races locally, though, on the whole,
they were contemporaneous, is that known as the Cannstadt or
Neanderthal people, who are characterized by a low forehead,
with beetling brows, massive limb bones and moderate stature.
So far as known they were the ruder and less artistic of the two
races. The other, the Engis or Cromagnon race, was of higher
type, with well-formed and capacious skull, and a countenance
which, if somewhat broad, with high cheek bones, eyes length-
ened laterally, and heavy lower jaw, must have been of some-
what grand and impressive features. These men are of great
stature, some examples being seven feet in height, and with
massive bones, having strong muscular impressions. The Engis
skull found in a cave in Belgium, with bones of the mammoth,
the skeletons of the Cromagnon cave in the valley of the Vezere,
in France, and those of the caves of Mentonc, in Italy, repre-
EARLY MAN 473
sent this race. Doubts, it is true, have been entertained as to
whether the last mentioned race is really palanthropic ; but the
latest facts as to their mode of occurrence and associations
seem to render this certain. These men were certainly contem-
poraneous with the mammoth, and they disappeared in the
cataclysm which closed the earlier anthropic period. Attempts
have, however, been made to separate them into groups ac-
cording to age, within this period ; ^ and there can be no doubt
that both in France and England the lower and older strata
of gravels and caves yield ruder and less perfect implements
than the higher. Independently, however, of the fact that the
very earliest men may have been peaceful gatherers of fruit, and
not hunters or warriors, having need of lethal weapons, such
facts may rather testify to local improvement in the condition
of certain tribes than to any change of race. Such local im-
provement would be very likely to occur wherever a new
locality was taken possession of by a small and wandering
tribe, which, in process of time, might increase in numbers
and in wealth, as well as in means of intercourse with other
tribes. A similar succession would occur when caves, used
at first as temporary places of rendezvous by savage tribes,
became afterwards places of residence, or were acquired by
conquest on the part of tribes a little more advanced, in the
manner in which such changes are constantly taking place in
rude communities.
Yet on facts of this nature have been built extensive generali-
zations as to a race of river-drift men, in a low and savage con-
dition, replaced, after the lapse of ages, by a people somewhat
more advanced in the arts, and specially addicted to a cavern
life ; and this conclusion is extended to Europe and Asia, so
that in every case where rude flint implements exist in river
gravels, evidence is supposed to be found of the earlier of these
races. But no physical break separates the two periods ; the
' Morlillet, " Pic-hisloric Men."
474 EARLY MAN
fauna remained the same ; the skulls, so far as known, present
little difference ; and even in works of art the distinction is in-
validated by grave exceptions, which are intensified by the fact,
which the writer has elsewhere illustrated, that in the case of
the same people their residences in caves, etc., and their places
of burial are likely to contain very different objects from those
which they leave in river gravels.
It is admitted that the whole of these Palaeocosmic men are
racially distinct from modern men, though most nearly allied
in physical characters to some of the Mongoloid races of the
northern regions. Some of their characters also appear in the
native races of America, and occasional cases occur, when even
the characters of the Cannstadt skull reappear in modern times.
The skull of the great Scottish king Robert Bruce was of this
type ; and his indomitable energy and governing power may
have been connected with this fact. Attempts have even been
made ^ to show an intimate connection between the cave men
and the Esquimaux of Greenland and Arctic America, but, as
Wilson has well shown, ^ this is not borne out by their cranial'
characters, and the resemblances, such as they are, in arts and
implements, are common to the Esquimaux and many other
American tribes. In many respects, however, the arts and
mode of life, as well as some of the physical characters of the
Palaeocosmic men of Europe were near akin to those of the
ruder native races of America.
Perhaps one of the most curious examples of this is the cave
at Sorde, in the western Pyrenees. On the floor of this cave
lay a human skeleton, covered with fallen blocks of stone.
With it were found forty canine teeth of the bear, and three of
the lion, perforated for suspension, and several of these teeth
are skilfully engraved with figures of animals, one bearing the
engraved figure of an embroidered glove. This necklace, no
* Dawkins, " Early Man in Britain."
* Address to Anthropological section of the American Association, 1SS2.
EARLY MAN 475
doubt just such a trophy of the chase as would now be worn by
a red Indian hunter, though more elaborate, must have belonged
to the owner of the skull, who would appear to have perished
by a fall of rock, or to have had his body covered after death
with stones. In the deposit near and under these remains
were flint flakes. Above the skull were several feet of refuse,
stones, and bones of the horse, reindeer, etc., and " Paleolithic"
flint implements, and above all were placed the remains of
thirty skulls and skeletons with beautifully chipped flint imple-
ments, some of them as fine as any of later age. After the
burial of these the cave seems to have been finally closed with
large stones. The French explorers of this cave refer the lower
and upper skulls to the same race, that of Cromagnon ; but
others consider the upper remains as "Neolithic," though there
is no reason why a man who possessed a necklace of beautifully
carved teeth should not have belonged to a tribe which used
well-made stone implements, or why the weapons buried with
the dead should have been no better than the chips and flakes
left by the same people in their rubbish heaps. In any case
the interment — and this applies also to the Mentone caves — ■
recalls the habits of American aborigines. In some of these
cases we have even deposits of red oxide of iron, representing
the war paint of the ancient hunter.
Widely different opinions have been held by archaeologists
as to the connection of the Palanthropic and Neanthropic ages.
It suits the present evolutionist and exaggerated unlformitarian-
ism of our day to take for granted that the two are continuous,
and pass into each other. But there are stubborn facts against
this conclusion. Let us take, for example, the area represented
by the British Islands and the neighbouring continent. In the
earlier period Britain was a part of the mainland, and was occu-
pied by the mammoth, the woolly rhinoceros, and other
animals, now locally or wholly extinct. The human inhabit-
ants were of a large-bodied and coarse race not now found
S. E. 34
476 EARLY MAN
anywhere. In the later period all this is changed. Britain
has become an island. Its gigantic Post-glacial fauna has dis-
appeared. Its human inhabitants are now small in stature and
delicate in feature, and represented to this day by parts of the
population of the south of Wales and Ireland. They buried
their dead in the peculiar cemeteries known as long barrows,
and their implements and weapons are of a new type, previously
unknown. All this shows a great interval of physical and
organic mutation. In connection with this we have the high-
level gravel and rubble, which Prestwich has shown to belong
to this stage, and which proves a subsidence even greater than
that to be inferred from the present diminution of the land
area. Knowing as we do that the close of the Glacial period
was not more than 8,000 years ago, and deducting from this
the probable duration of the Palanthropic age on the one hand,
and that of modern history on the other, we must admit that
the. interval left for the great physical andfaunal changes above
referred to is too small to permit them to have occurred as the
re;sult of slow and gradual operations. Considerations of this
kind have indeed some of the best authorities on the subject,
as Cartailhac, Forel, and de IMortillet, to hold that there is
"an immense space, a great gap, during which the fauna was
renewed, and after which a new race of men suddenly made its
appearance, and polished stone instead of chipping it, and sur-
rounded themselves with domestic animals."^ There is thus, in
the geological history of man an interval of physical and organic
change, corresponding to that traditional and historical deluge
which has left its memory with all the more ancient nations.
Thus our men of the Palanthropic, Post-glacial or Mammoth
age are the same we have been accustomed to call Antediluvians,
and their immediate successors are identical with the Basques
^ Quatrefages, "The Human Species." The interval should not, how-
ever, be placed after the reindeer period, as this animal occurs in both
ages.
EARLY MAN 477
and ancient Iberians, a non-Aryan or Turanian people who
once possessed nearly the whole of Europe, and included the
rude Ugrians and Laps of the north, the civilized Etruscans of
the south, and the Iberians of the west, with allied tribes occu-
pying the British Islands. This race, scattered and overthrown
before the dawn of authentic history in Europe by the Celts
and other intrusive peoples, was unquestionably that which
succeeded the now extinct Palsocosmic race, and constituted
the men of the so-called " Neolithic period," which thus con-
nects itself with the modern history of Europe, from which it
is not separated by any physical catastrophe like that which
divides the older men of the mammoth age and the widely
spread continents of the Post-glacial period from our modern
days. This identification of the Neolithic men with the
Iberians, which the writer has also insisted on, Dawkins de-
serves credit for fully elucidating, and he might have carried it
farther, to the identification of these same Iberians with the
Berbers, theGuanches of the Canary Islands, and the Caribbean
and other tribes of eastern and central America. On these
hitherto dark subjects light is now rapidly breaking, and we
may hope that much of the present obscurity will soon be
cleared away.
Supposing, then, that we may apply the term Anthropic to
that portion of the Kainozoic period which intervenes between
the close of the Glacial age and the present time, and that we
admit the division of this into two portions, the earlier, called
the Palanthropic, and the later, which still continues, the Nean-
thropic, it will follow that one great physical and organic break
separates the Palanthropic age from the preceding Glacial, and
a second similar break separates the two divisions of the An-
thropic from each other. This being settled, if we allow say
2,500 years from the Glacial age for the first peopling of the
world and the Palanthropic age, and if we consider the modern
history of the European region and the adjoining parts of Asia
47^ EARLY MAN
and Africa to go back for 5,000 years, there will remain a space
of from 500 to 1,000 years for the destruction of the Palaeo-
cosmic men and the re-peopling of the old continent by such
survivors as founded the Neocosmic peoples. These later
peoples, though distinct racially from their predecessors, may
represent a race contemporary with them in some regions in
which it was possible to survive the great cataclysm, so that we
do not need to ask for time to develop such new race.^
We cannot but feel some regret that the grand old Pala^o-
cosmic race was destined to be swept away by the flood, but it
was no doubt better for the world that it should be replaced by
a more refined if feebler race. When we see how this has, in
some of its forms, reverted to the old type, and emulated, if not
surpassed it in filling the earth with violence, we may, perhaps,
congratulate ourselves on the extinction of the giant races of the
olden time.
References : — " Fossil Men," London, 18S0. The Antiquity of Man,
Princeton Kevieiv. " Pre-liistoric ALin in Egypt and the Lebanon,"
Trans. Vict. Institute, 1884. Pre-historic Times in Egypt and Palestine,
North American Kivinv^ June and July, 1S92.
' For details of the physical characters of the older races of men I may
refer to the works mentioned below, or to the writings of Dawkins anil
Quatrefages.
MAN IN NATURE.
DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF
MY DEAR FRIEND DR. P. P. CARPENTER,
at once an eminent naturalist and
Educator —
equally a lover of nature,
OF HIS Fellow Men and of God,
What is Nature — Man a part of Nature — Distinction
BETWEEN Man and other Animals — Man as an
Imitator of Nature — Man as at War with Nature
— Man in Harmony with Nature
Carving ok the rALANTiiRoru- Agf. — Cave of Mas d'Azil, France ;
after Carlailliac.
Heads of the wild horse, carved on antler of the reindeer, and showing
accurate imitation of nature, with ideal and adaptive art on the part of the
antediluvian sculptor. (See p. 490.)
CHAPTER XVIIl.
MAN IN NA TURE.
FF-W words are used among us more loosely than "nature."
Sometimes it stands for the material universe as a whole.
Sometimes it is personified as a sort of goddess, working her
own sweet will with material things. Sometimes it expresses
the forces which act on matter, and again it stands for material
things themselves. It is spoken of as subject to law, but just
as often natural law is referred to in terms which imply that
nature itself is the lawgiver. It is supposed to be opposed to
the equally vague term "supernatural" ; but this term is used
not merely to denote things above and beyond nature, if there
are such, but certain opinions held respecting natural things.
On the other hand, the natural is contrasted with the artificial,
though this is always the outcome of natural powers, and is
certainly not supernatural. Again, it is applied to the inherent
properties of beings for which we are unable to account, and
which we are content to say constitute their nature. We can-
not look into the works of any of the more speculative writers
of the day without meeting with all these uses of the word, and
have to be constantly on our guard lest by a change of its
meaning we shall be led to assent to some proposition alto-
gether unfounded.
For illustrations of this convenient though dangerous ambi-
guity, I may turn at random to almost any page in Darwin's
celebrated work on the "Origin of Species." In the beginning
of Chapter III. he speaks of animals " in a state of nature ''
482 MAN IN NATURE
that is, not in a domesticated or artificial condition, so that here
nature is opposed to the devices of man. Then he speaks of
species as "arising in nature,'' that is, spontaneously produced
in the midst of certain external conditions or environment out-
side of the organic world. A little farther on he speaks of use-
ful varieties as given to man by " the hand of Nature," which
here becomes an imaginary person ; and it is worthy of notice
that in this place the printer or proof-reader has given the word
an initial capital, as if a proper name. In the next section he
speaks of the " works of Nature " as superior to those of art.
Here the word is not only opposed to the artificial, but seems
to imply some power above material things and comparable
with or excelling the contriving intelligence of man. I do not
mean by these examples to imply that Darwin is in this respect
more inaccurate than other writers. On the contrary, he is
greatly surpassed by many of his contemporaries in the varied
and fixntastic uses of this versatile word. An illustration which
occurs to me here, as at once amusing and instructive, is an
expression used by Romanes, one of the cleverest of the fol-
lowers of the great evolutionist, and which appears to him to
give a satisfactory explanation of the mystery of elevation in
nature. He says, " Nature selects the best individuals out of
each generation to live." Here nature must be an intelligent
agent, or the statement is simply nonsensical. The same alter-
native applies to much of the use of the favourite term " natural
selection." In short, those who use such modes of expression
would be more consistent if they were at once to come back to
the definition of Seneca, that nature is " a certain divine purpose
manifested in the world."
The derivation of the word gives us the idea of something
produced or becoming, and it is curious that the Greek p/iysis,
though etymologically distinct, conveys the same meaning — a
coincidence which may perhaps lead us to a safe and service-
able definition. Nature, rightly understood, is, in short, an
MAN IN NATURE 483
orderly system of things in time and space, and this not invari-
able, but in a state of constant movement and progress, whereby
it is always becoming something different from what it was.
Now man is placed in the midst of this orderly, law-regulated
yet ever progressive system, and is himself a part of it ; and if
we can understand his real relations to its other parts, we shall
have made some approximation to a true philosophy. The
subject has been often discussed, but is perhaps not yet quite
exhausted.^
Regarding man as a part of nature, we must hold to his
entering into the grand unity of the natural system, and must
not set up imaginary antagonisms between man and nature as
if he were outside of it. An instance of this appears in Tyn-
dall's celebrated Belfast address, where he says, in explanation
of the errors of certain of the older philosophers, that "the ex-
periences which formed the weft and woof of their theories were
chosen not from the study of nature, but from that which lay
much nearer to them — the observation of Man ": a statement
this which would make man a supernatural, or at least a preter-
natural being. Again, it does not follow, because man is a part
of nature, that he must be precisely on a level with its other
parts. There are in nature many planes of existence, and man
is no doubt on one of its higher planes, and possesses distin-
guishing powers and properties of his own. Nature, like a per-
fect organism, is not all eye or all hand, but includes various
organs, and so far as we see it in our planet, man is its head,
though wc can easily conceive that there may be higher beings
in other parts of the universe beyond our ken.
The view which we may take of man's position relatively to
the beings which are nearest to him, namely, the lower animals,
will depend on our point of sight— whether that of mere anatomy
' " Man's Place ill Nature, " /'/■///tr/t;;/ y^t^vcTc, November, 1S78. "The
Unity of Nature," by tlie Duke of Argyll, 1SS4, may be considered as sug-
gestive of the thoughts of this chapter.
484 MAN IX NATURE
and physiolog}', or that of psychology and pneumatology as
well. This distinction is the more important, since, under the
somewhat delusive term ''l)iology," it has been customary to
mix up all these considerations, while, on the other hand, those
anatomists who regard all the functions of organic beings as
merely mechanical and physical, do not scruple to employ this
term biology for their science, though on their hypothesis there
can be no such thing as life, and consequently the use of the
word by them must be either superstitious or hypocritical.
Anatomically considered, man is an animal of the class
MammaUa. In that class, notwithstanding the heroic efforts of
some modern detractors from his dignity to place him with the
monkeys in the order Primates, he undoubtedly belongs to a
distinct order. I have elsewhere argued that, if he were an ex-
tinct animal, the study of the bones of his hand, or of his head,
would suffice to convince any competent palaeontologist that he
represents a distinct order, as far apart from the highest apes as
they are from the carnivora. That he belongs to a distinct
family no anatomist denies, and the same unanimity of course
obtains as to his generic and specific distinctness. On the other
hand, no zoological systematist now doubts that all the races of
men are specifically identical. Thus we have the anatomical
})osition of man firmly fixed in the system of nature, and he
must be content to acknowledge his kinship not only with the
higher animals nearest to him, but with the humblest animalcule.
With all he shares a common material and many common fea-
tures of structure.
When we ascend to the somewhat higher plane of physiology
we find in a general way the same relationship to animals. Of
the four grand leading functions of the animal, nutrition, repro-
duction, voluntary motion, and sensation, all are performed by
man as by other animals. Here, however, there are some
marked divergences connected with special anatomical struc-
tures, on the one hand, and with his higher endowments on the
MAN IN NATURE 485
Other. With regard to food, for example, man might be sup-
posed to be limited by his masticatory and digestive apparatus
to succulent vegetable substances. But by virtue of his inven-
tive faculties he is practically unlimited, being able by artificial
processes to adapt the whole range of vegetable and animal
food substances to his use. He is very poorly furnished with
natural tools to aid in procuring food, as claws, tusks, etc.,
but by invented implements he can practically surpass all other
creatures. The long time of helplessness in infancy, while
it is necessary for the development of his powers, is a practi-
cal disadvantage which leads to many social arrangements and
contrivances specially characteristic of man. Man's sensory
powers, while inferior in range to those of many other animals,
are remarkable for balance and completeness, leading to percep-
tions of differences in colours, sounds, etc., which lie at the
foundation of art. The specialization of the hand again connects
itself with contrivances which render an animal naturally de-
fenceless the most formidable of all, and an animal naturally
gifted with indifferent locomotive powers able to outstrip all
others in speed and range of locomotion. Thus the physiolo-
gical endowments of man, while common to him with other
animals, and in some respects inferior to theirs, present in com-
bination with his higher powers points of difference which lead
to the most special and unexpected results.
In his ^hft^^leal- relations, using this term in its narrower
sense, we may see still greater divergencies from the line of
the lower animals. These may no doubt be connected with
his greater volume of brain ; but recent researches seem to
show that brain has more to do with motory and sensory
powers than with those that are intellectual, and thus, that a
larger brain is only indirectly connected with higher mental
manifestations. Even in the lower animals it is clear that the
ferocity of the tiger, the constructive instinct of the beaver, and
the sagacity of the elephant depend on psychical powers which
486 MAN IN NATURE
are beyond the reach of the anatomist's knife, and this is still
more markedly the case in man. Following in part the in-
genious analysis of Mivart, we may regard the psychical powers
of man as reflex, instinctive, emotional, and intellectual ; and
in each of these aspects we shall find points of resemblance to
other animals, and of divergence from them. In regard to re-
flex actions, or those which are merely automatic, inasmuch as
they are intended to provide for certain important functions
without thought or volition, their development is naturally in
the inverse ratio of psychical elevation, and man is conse-
quently, in this respect, in no way superior to lower animals.
The same may be said with reference to instinctive powers,
which provide often for complex actions in a spontaneous and
unreasoning manner. In these also man is rather deficient
than otherwise ; and since, from their nature, they limit their
possessors to narrow ranges of activity, and fix them within
a definite scope of experience and efiiciency, they would be
incompatible with those higher and more versatile inventive
powers which man possesses. The comb-building instinct of
the bee, the nest-weaving instinct of the bird, are fixed and
invariable things, obviously incompatible with the varied con-
trivance of man ; and while instinct is perfect within its narrow
range, it cannot rise beyond this into the sphere of unlimited
thought and contrivance. Higher than mere instinct are the
powers of imagination, memory, and association, and here man
at once steps beyond his animal associates, and develops these
in such a variety of ways, that even the rudest tribes of men,
who often appear to trust more to these endowments than to
higher powers, rise into a plane immeasurably above that of
the highest and most intelligent brutes, and toward which they
are unable, except to a very limited degree, to raise those of
the more domesticable animals which they endeavour to train
into companionship with themselves. It is, however, in these
domesticated animals that we find the highest degree of approx-
MAN IN NATURE 487
imation to ourselves in emotional development, and this is
perhaps one of the points that fits them for such human asso-
ciation. In approaching the higher psychical endowments, the
affinity of man and the brute appears to diminish and at length
to cease, and it is left to him alone to rise into the domain of
the rational and ethical.
Those supreme endowments of man we may, following the
nomenclature of ancient philosophy and of our Sacred Scrip-
tures, call " pneumatical " or spiritual. They consist of con-
sciousness, reason, and moral volition. That man possesses
these powers every one knows ; that they exist or can be de-
veloped in lower animals no one has succeeded in proving.
Here, at length, we have a severance between man and material
nature. Yet it does not divorce him from the unity of nature,
except on the principles of atheism. For if it separates him
from animals, it allies him with the Power who made and
planned the animals. To the naturalist the fact that such
capacities exist in a being who in his anatomical structure so
closely resembles the lower animals, constitutes an evidence of
the independent existence of those powers and of their spiritual
character and relation to a higher power which, I think, no
metaphysical reasoning or materialistic scepticism will suffice
to invalidate. It would be presumption, however, from the
standpoint of the naturalist to discuss at length the powers of
man's spiritual being. I may refer merely to a few points
which illustrate at once his connection with other creatures,
and his superiority to them as a higher member of nature.
And, first, we may notice those axiomatic beliefs which lie at
the foundation of human reasoning, and which, while appa-
rently in harmony with nature, do not admit of verification
except by an experience impossible to finite beings. Whether
these are ultimate truths, or merely results of the constitution
bestowed on us, or effects of the direct action of the creative
mind on ours, they are to us like the instincts of animals — in-
488 MAN IN NATURE
fallible and unchanging. Yet, just as the instincts of animals
unfailingly connect them with their surroundings, our intui-
tive beliefs fit us for understanding nature and for existing in it
as our environment. These beliefs also serve to connect man
with his fellow man, and in this aspect we may associate with
them those universal ideas of right and wrong, of immortality,
and of powers above ourselves, which pervade humanity.
Another phase of this spiritual constitution is illustrated by
the ways in which man, starting from powers and contrivances
common to him and animals, develops them into new and
higher uses and results. This is markedly seen in the gift ot
speech. Man, like other animals, has certain natural utterances
expressive of emotions or feelings. He can also, like some of
them, imitate the sounds produced by animate or inanimate
objects; while the constitution of his brain and vocal organs
gives him special advantages for articulate utterance. But
when he develops these gifts into a system of speech expres.s-
ing not mere sounds occurring in nature, but by association
nd analogy with these, properties and relations of objects and
general and abstract ideas, he rises into the higher sphere of
the spiritual. He thus elevates a power of utterance common
to him with animals to a higher plane, and connecting it with
his capacity for understanding nature and arriving at general
truths, asserts his kinship to the great creative mind, and fur-
nishes a link of connection between the material universe and
the spiritual Creator.
The manner of existence of man in nature is as well illus-
trated by his arts and inventions as by anything else ; and
these serve also to enlighten us as to the distinction between
the natural and the artificial. Naturalists often represent man
as dependent on nature for the first hints of his useful arts.
There are in animal nature tailors, weavers, masons, potters,
carpenters, miners, and sailors, independently of man, and
many of the tools, implements, and machines which he is said
MAN IN NATURE 489
to have invented were perfected in the structures of lower ani-
mals long before he came into existence. In all these things
man has been an assiduous learner from nature, though in
some of them, as for example in the art of aerial navigation,
he has striven in vain to imitate the powers possessed by other
animals. But it may well be doubted whether man is in this
respect so much an imitator as has been supposed, and whether
the resemblance of his plans to those previously realized in
nature does not depend on that general fitness of things which
suggests to rational minds similar means to secure similar
ends. But in saying this we in effect say that man is not only
a part of nature, but that his mind is in harmony with the
plans of nature, or, in other words, with the methods of the
creative mind. Man is also curiously in harmony with ex-
ternal nature in the combination in his works of the ideas of
plan and adaptation, of ornament and use. In architecture,
for example, devising certain styles or orders, and these for
the most part based on imitations of natural things ; he adapts
these to his ends, just as in nature types of structure are adapted
to a great variety of uses, and he strives to combine, as in
nature, perfect adaptation to use with conformity to type or
style. So, in his attempts at ornament he copies natural forms,
and uses these forms to decorate or conceal parts intended to
serve essential purposes in the structure. This is at least the
case in the purer styles of construction. It is in the more de-
based styles that arches, columns, triglyphs, or buttresses are
placed where they can serve no useful purpose, and become
mere excrescences. But in this case the abnormality resulting
breeds in the beholder an unpleasing mental confusion, and
causes him, even when he is unable to trace his feelings to
their source, to be dissatisfied with the result. Thus man is
in harmony with that arrangement of nature which causes
every ornamental part to serve some use, and which unites
adaptation with plan.
s. E. 35
490 MAN IN NATURE
The following of nature must also form the basis of those
fine arts which are not necessarily connected with any utility,
and in man's pursuit of art of this kind we see one of the most
recondite and at first sight inexplicable of his correspondences
with the other parts of nature ; for there is no other creature
tliat pursues art for its own sake. Modern archaeological dis-
covery has shown that the art of sculpture began with the
oldest known races of man, and that they succeeded in produc-
ing very accurate imitations of natural objects. But from this
primitive starting-point two ways diverge. One leads to the
conventional and the grotesque, and this course has been
followed by many semi-civilized nations. Another leads to
accurate imitation of nature, along with new combinations
.arising from the play of intellect and imagination. Let us look
for a moment at the actual result of the development of these
diverse styles of art, and at their effect on the culture of hu-
manity as existing in nature. ^Ve may imagine a people who
have wholly discarded nature in their art, and have devoted
themselves to the monstrous and the grotesque. Such a
people, so far as art is concerned, separates itself widely from
nature and from the mind of the Creator, and its taste and
j)Ossibly its morals sink to the level of the monsters it pro-
duces. Again, we may imagine a people in all respects
following nature in a literal and servile manner. Such a people
would probably attain to but a very moderate amount of cul-
ture, but having a good foundation, it might ultimately build
up higher things. Lastly, we may fancy a people who, like
the old Greeks, strove to add to the copying of nature a higher
and ideal beauty by combining in one the best features of
many natural objects, or devising new combinations not found
in nature itself. In the first of these conditions of art we have
a falling away from or caricaturing of the beauty of nature. In
the second we have merely a pupilage to nature. In the third
we find man aiming to be himself a creator, but basing his
MAN IN NATURE 491
creations on what nature has given him. Thus all art worthy
of the name is really a development of nature. It is true the
eccentricities of art and fashion are so erratic that they may
often seem to have no law. Yet they are all under the rule
of nature ; and hence even uninstructed common-sense, unless
dulled by long familiarity, detects in some degree their incon-
gruity, and though it may be amused for a time, at length
becomes wearied with the mental irritation and nervous dis-
quiet which they produce.
I may be permitted to add that all this applies with still
greater force to systems of science and philosophy. Ultimately
these must be all tested by the verities of nature to which man
necessarily submits his intellect, and he who builds for aye must
build on the solid ground of nature. The natural environ-
ment presents itself in this connection as an educator of man.
From the moment when infancy begins to exercise its senses
on the objects around, this education begins — training the
powers of observation and comparison, cultivating the concep-
tion of the grand and beautiful, leading to analysis and abstract
and general ideas. Left to itself, it is true this natural educa-
tion extends but a little way, and ordinarily it becomes ob-
scured or crushed by the demands of a hard utility, or by an
artificial literary culture, or by the habitude of monstrosity and
unfitness in art. Yet, when rightly directed, it is capable of
becoming an instrument of the highest culture, intellectual,
aesthetic, and even moral. A rational system of education
would follow nature in the education of the young, and drop
much that is arbitrary and artificial. Here I would merely
remark, that when we find that the accurate and systematic
study of nature trains most effectually some of the more prac-
tical powers of mind, and leads to the highest development of
taste for beauty in art, we see in this relation the unity of man
and nature, and the unity of both with something higher than
either.
492 MAN IN NATURE
It may, however, occur to us here, that when we consider
man as an improver and innovator in the world, there is much
that suggests a contrariety between him and nature, and that,
instead of being the pupil of his environment, he becomes its
tyrant. In this aspect man, and especially civilized man, appears
as the enemy of wild nature, so that in those districts which
he has most fully subdued, many animals and plants have been
exterminated, and nearly the whole surface has come under his
processes of culture, and has lost the characteristics which
belonged to it in its primitive state. Nay more, we find that
by certain kinds of so-called culture man tends to exhaust and
impoverish the soil, so that it ceases to minister to his com-
fortable support, and becomes a desert. Vast regions of the
earth are in this impoverished condition, and the westward
march of exhaustion warns us that the time may come when
even in comparatively new countries, like America, the land will
cease to be able to sustain its inhabitants. Behind this stands
a still farther and portentous possibility. The resources of
chemistry are now being taxed to the utmost to discover
methods by which the materials of human food may be pro-
duced synthetically, and we may possibly, at some future time,
find that albumen and starch may be manufactured cheaply
from their elements by artificial processes. Such a discovery
might render man independent of the animal and vegetable
kingdoms. Agriculture might become an unnecessary and un-
profitable art. A time might come when it would no longer
be possible to find on earth a green field, or a wild animal ;
and when the whole earth would be one great factory, in which
toiling millions were producing all the materials of food, cloth-
ing, and shelter. Such a world may never exist, but its pos-
sible existence may be imagined, and its contemplation brings
vividly before us the vast powers inherent in man as a sub-
verter of the ordinary course of nature. Yet even this ultimate
annulling of wild nature would be brought about not by any-
MAN IN NATURE 493
thing preternatural in man, but simply by his placing himself
in alliance with certain natural powers and agencies, and by
their means attaining dominion over the rest.
Here there rises before us a spectre which science and
philosophy appear afraid to face, and which asks the dread
question, — What is the cause of the apparent abnormality in
the relations of man and nature? In attempting to solve
this question, we must admit that the position of man, even
here, is not without natural analogies. The stronger preys
upon the weaker, the lower form gives place to the higher,
and in the progress of geological time old species have died
out in favour of newer, and old forms of life have been
exterminated by later successors. Man, as the newest and
highest of all, has thus the natural right to subdue and rule
the world. Yet there can be little doubt that he uses this
right unwisely and cruelly, and these terms themselves explain
•why he does so, because they imply freedom of will. Given
a system of nature destitute of any being higher than the
instinctive animal, and introduce into it a free rational agent,
and you have at once an element of instability. So long as
his free thought and purpose continue in harmony with the
arrangements of his environment, so long all will be har-
monious ; but the very hypothesis of freedom implies that he
■can act otherwise, and so perfect is the equilibrium of existing
things, that one wrong or unwise action may unsettle the nice
balance, and set in operation trains of causes and effects
producing continued and ever-increasing disturbance. Thus
the most primitive state of man, though destitute of all me-
chanical inventions, may have been better in relation to the
other parts of nature than any that he has subsequently
attained to. His " many inventions " have injured him in
his natural relations. This " fall of man " we know as a
matter of observation and experience has actually occurred,
and it can be retrieved only by casting man back again into
494 ^lAN IN NATURE
the circle of merely instinctive action, or by carrying him
forward until, by growth in wisdom and knowledge, he becomes,
fitted to be the lord of creation. The first method has been
proved unsuccessful by the rebound of humanity against all
the attempts to curb and suppress its liberty. The second
has been the effort of all reformers and philanthropists since
the world began, and its imperfect success affords a strong
ground for clinging to the theistic view of nature, for soliciting
the intervention of a Power higher than man, and for hoping
for a final restitution of all things through the intervention of
that Power. Mere materialistic evolution must ever and
necessarily fail to account for the higher nature of man, and
also for his moral aberrations. These only come rationally
into the system of nature under the supposition of a Higher
Intelligence, from whom man emanates, and whose nature he
shares.
But on this theistic view we are introduced to a kind of
unity and of evolution for a future age, which is the great
topic of revelation, and is not unknown to science and philo-
sophy, in connection with the law of progress and develop-
ment deducible from the geological history, in which an
ascending series of lower animals culminates in man himself.
Why should there not be a new and higher plane of existence
to be attained to by humanity — a new geological period, so
to speak, in which present anomalies shall be corrected, and
the grand unity of the universe and its harmony with its-
Maker fully restored. This is what Paul anticipates when he
tells us of a " pneumatical " or spiritual body, to succeed ta
the present natural or " psychical " one, or what Jesus Himself
tells us when He says that in the future state we shall be like
to the angels. Angels arc not known to us as objects of
scientific observation, but such an order of beings is quite
conceivable, and this not as supernatural, but as part of the
order of nature. They are created beings like ourselves^
MAN IN NATURE 495
subject to the laws of the universe, yet free and intelHgent
and hable to error, in bodily constitution freed from many of
the limitations imposed on us, mentally having higher range
and grasp, and consequently masters of natural powers not
under our control. In short, we have here pictured to us
an order of beings forming a part of nature, yet in their
powers as miraculous to us as we might be supposed to be
to lower animals, could they think of such things. This idea
of angels bridges over the great natural gulf between humanity
and deity, and illustrates a higher plane than that of man
in his present state, but attainable in the future. Dim per-
■ceptions of this would seem to constitute the substratum of
the ideas of the so-called polytheistic religions. Christianity
itself is in this aspect not so much a revelation of the super-
natural as the highest bond of the great unity of nature. It
reveals to us the perfect Man, who is also one with God, and
the mission of this Divine Man to restore the harmonies of
God and humanity, and consequently also of man with his
natural environment in this world, and with his spiritual en-
vironment in the higher world of the future. If it is true
that nature now groans because of man's depravity, and that
man himself shares in the evils of this disharmony with nature
around him, it is clear that if man could be restored to his
true place in nature he would be restored to happiness and
to harmony with God, and if, on the other hand, he can be
restored to harmony with God, he will then be restored also
to harmony with his natural environment, and so to life and
happiness and immortality. It is here that the old story of
Eden, and the teaching of Christ, and the prophecy of the
New Jerusalem strike the same note which all material nature
gives forth when we interrogate it respecting its relations to
man. The profound manner in w-hich these truths appear in
the teaching of Christ has perhaps not been appreciated as it
should, because we have not sought in that teaching the
49^ MAN IN NATURE
philosophy of nature which it contains. When He points to
the common weeds of the fields, and asks us to consider the
garments more gorgeous than those of kings in which God
has clothed them, and when He says of these same wild
flowers, so daintily made by the Supreme Artificer, that to-day
they are, and to-morrow are cast into the oven. He gives us
not merely a lesson of faith, but a deep insight into that want
of unison which, centring in humanity, reaches all the way
from the wild flower to the God who made it, and requires
for its rectification nothing less than the breathing of that
Divine Spirit which first evoked order and life out of primeval
chaos.
References : — Articles in Princeton Review on Man in Nature and on
Evolution. "The Story of the Earth and Man." London,
1890. " Modern Ideas of Evolution." London, 1891. Nature as an
Educator. Canadian Record of Science, 1890.
INDEX OF PRINCIPAL TOPICS.
Airbreathers, their Origin and His-
tory, 257, 303.
Alpine and Arctic Plants, their
Geological History, 425.
American Stone Age, 464.
Animals, their Apparition and
Succession, 169.
their Geological History, 176,
187, 194.
Permanent Forms of, 87, 180.
Anthropic Age, 461.
Antiquity of Man, 469.
Arctic Climates in the Past, 213.
Atlantic, its Origin and History, 57.
■ Cosmical Functions of, 72.
its Influence on Climate, 81.
Deposits in, 83.
Migrations across, 84.
Future of, 90.
Azores, their Animals, 40S.
Baphetes planiceps, 263.
Bay of Fundy, its Deposits, 312.
Footprints on Shores of, 311.
Bermudas, their Flora, etc., 85.
Boulders, Belts of, on Lower St.
Lawrence, 345.
Boulder-Clay, Nature, etc. , of, 360.
Cave Men, 476.
Canstadt Race, 474.
Chaos, Vision of, 90.
Chronology of Pleistocene, 470.
S. E.
Climate, its Causes, 81.
as related to Plants, 215.
Climatal Changes, 382.
Coal, its Nature and Structure, 235.
its Origin and Growth, 233.
Summary of Facts relating to,
241.
of Mesozoic and Tertiary, 249.
its Connection with Erect
Forests, 296.
Continents and Islands, 402.
Permanence of, 31, 403.
Contrast of land and sea-borne
Ice, 360.
Cordilleran Glaciers, 369.
Cro-magnon Race, 474.
Crust and Sub-crust, 62.
Dawn of Life, 95.
Deluge, The, 467.
Dendrerpeton Acadianuni, 270.
Determination in Nature, 329.
Development of Life, 23.
Laws of, 194.
Distribution of Animals and Plants,
401.
Drift of Western Canada, 369.
Early Man, 459.
Engis Race, 472.
Eozoon, Discovery of, iii.
Nature of, 112.
Contemporaries of, 129.
Teachings of, 135.
497 3^6
498
INDEX OF PRINCIPAL TOPICS.
Eozoon, Preservation of and Struc-
ture, 143.
Eyes, earliest Types of, 331.
Evolution, its partial Character,
188.
Flora of White Mountains, 421.
Floras originate in the Arctic, 297.
Floating Ice, 360.
Footprints of Reptiles, 260.
of Limulus, 319.
Fossils, Preservation of, 136.
Fucoids, 311.
Galapagos, how Peopled, 412.
Geographical Changes and Climate,
390.
Geological Record, Imperfection of,
40.
Glaciers, Work of, 353.
Glacial Period, Conditions of, 375.
Gulf Stream, 3S8.
Hydrous Silicates, 144.
Huronian as a Geological System,
104.
Hylonomus Lyelli, 279.
Icebergs, their Nature and Work,
348.
Ice Age, the, 343.
Imperfection of the Geological Re-
cord, 40.
Land and Water, 58.
Land Snails, Earliest, 247.
Labyrinthodonts, their Origin and
History, 265.
Laurentian System, 97.
Life in the, 107.
Laurentide Glaciers, 3^64, 368.
Leda Clay of Lower St. Lawrence,
365.
Life, First Appearance of, 19, 96,
157.
Limbs, the Earliest, 337.
Limulus, Footprints of, 319.
Magmas under Crust of the Earth,
63-
Mammoth Age, 466.
Man in Nature, 484.
Early, 461.
an Imitator of Natural Objects,
490.
at War with other Natural
Agencies, 495.
in harmony with Nature, 496.
Markings, Footprints, etc., 301.
Rill and Rain, etc., 317.
Microsauria, 279,
Migrations of Plants, 434.
Millipedes of Carboniferous Age,
295.
Mineral Charcoal, 237.
Missouri Coteau, 271.
Mountains, Origin of, 33.
Classes of, 66.
Mount Washington, 426.
Nature, Various Senses ot the
Term, 483.
Neanthropic Age, 472.
Ocean, the Atlantic, 58, 67.
Oceanic Islands, 407.
Palanthropic Age, 462.
Permanence of Continents, 31, 403.
of Animal Forms, 87, 180.
Plants, Geological History of, 202.
as Indicators of Time and
Climate, 229.
of the Erian, Carboniferous,
etc., 202.
of the Pleistocene, 439.
INDEX OF PRINCIPAL TOPICS.
499
Pleistocene, Tabular View of, 472.
Polygenesis of Species, 418.
Predetermination in Nature, 329.
Primitive Rocks, 16.
Protozoa, their Place in Nature, 152.
Pseudo-Fucoids, 318.
Pupa Vetusta, 288.
Races of Early Men, 474.
Rill Marks, 317.
Scorpions, Carboniferous, 295.
Sigillaria', Erect, 276.
Sorde, Cave of, 476.
Species, Permanence of, 87, 180.
Origin of, 418.
Sponges in Cambro-Silurian, 46.
Spore-cases in Coal, 234.
Stigmaria, 246.
Stone Age in America, 464.
Terraces of Lower St
346.
Lawrence,
Tides of the Bay of Fundy, 312.
Time, Geological, 416.
Tracks of Animals, 51.
Trees, Erect, with Animal Remains,
276.
Tuckerman's Ravine, 427.
Underclays, their Origin and
Nature, 236.
Vegetable Life, the Earliest, 338.
Vegetable Kingdom, its History,
202.
Vertebrates, History of, 183.
Vision of Creation, 90.
Worlds, the Making of, 9, 14.
Worm Tracks, 318.
White Mountains, 426.
Zoological Regions, 405.
Butler & Tanner, The Selwood Printing Works, Frome, and London.
Date Due
/ ■'■
i^w_/*^>4:
.' ^^'^f
■C(.l.&...:...-.-<'
cEB 13 ^*
':^
jf7T#
n
Ir-
3^979
kf^-^-
6 "f?7#
Te>o
^ (7^ '
iPR.2
4.MZ9.9H
a
JIVERSITY OF B.C. LIBRARY
3 9424 02477 0221
■ v..
'->>,
,.*r-U?^J
■i^