illetin Number 472 Dereinher. 1961 1^ The EHecl of Rale of Nitrogen Ferlilizalion and Dale of Harvest on Yield, Peisislency and Nnliilive Value of Brome^rass Hay Yield and Persistency as Influenced by Nitrogen Rate and Time of Harvest. by Nobel K. Peterson and Paul T. Blood. Department of Agronomy TI. Nutriti\ e Value. by Nicholas F. Colovos and Harry A. Keener. Department of Dairy Science and Henry A. Davis. Department of Biochemistry New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station Durham, New Hampshire ilU'lin iNuniher 472 Deceinher. 1961 1?- The El'fecl of Rale (if Nitrogen Ferlilizalion and Dale of Harvest on Yield, Peisislency and Nnliilive Valne of l^roine^rass Hay Yield and Persistency as Influenced by Nitrogen Rate an- 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.2 1st 2>«1 3>^ 1st 2r^ 3tTl 1st 2«<) 3>t1 1st 2^ 3vxl 50 100 aoo 4-00 POUHDS OF MjTRO&EN Per AcRE PeR YE^R It severe loniparis<»n of 1'. k. (la (ioiitrni of IJroniegrass Forage 1957 1958 1959 Stage of Maturity and Nitrogen Percent Percent Percent Rate Per Acre * P K Ca P K Ca P K Ca 501b. nitrogen /acre Stage of maturity No. 1 .20 5.00 1.18 .26 4.23 1.18 .23 4.15 1.18 Stage of maturity No. 2 .14 3.90 1.19 .23 4.33 1.18 .20 3.98 1.32 Stage of maturity No. 3 .14 3.50 1.13 .25 4.88 1.30 .17 3.57 1.32 100 11] • . nitrogen acre Stage of maturity No. 1 .22 4.65 1.28 .23 4.73 1.30 .21 4.71 1.33 Stage of maturity No. 2 .15 4.20 1.20 .21 4.52 1.20 .18 3.93 1.33 Stage of maturity No. 3 .11 3.00 1.20 .16 3.80 1.25 .16 3.49 1.23 200 11] 1. nitrogen/acre Stage of maturity No. 1 .24 4.93 1.40 .19 4.R3 1.26 Stage of maturity No. 2 .22 6.00 1.37 .18 4.00 1.32 Stage of maturity No. 3 .18 3.90 1.33 .13 3.20 1.14 400 lb. nitrogen/acre Stage of maturity No. 1 .28 5.90 1.28 .19 4.65 1.48 * Stage of maturity No. 1 cut about June 1. Stage of maturity No. 2 cut about June 10. Stage of maturity No. 3 cut about June 20. -•5 Figure 3. Fifty Pounds of Nitrogen Per .4crc. 5 (>-& -^hJ Table 3. Weather Data for 1957-1959 Growiiig Seasons at Northwood, N. II. Month 1957 1958 1959 Rainfall (inches) April May June July August April May June July August 2.22 2.70 1.95 3.50 1.41 Temperature °F. Max., Min., Avg. 79:21:48 84:28:57 93:42:68 93:47:69 89:44:66 5.63 2.60 1.78 3.56 1.67 80:29:48 86:30:53 86:37:60 91:50:69 86:45:69 3.32 0.81 4.93 2.47 3.73 74:21:48 90:30:60 94:39:62 91:46:71 94:41:69 Figure 4. One Hundred Pounds of Nitrogen Per Acre. Figure 5. Two Hundred Pounds of Nitrogen Per Acre. Figure 6. Four Hundred Pounds of Nitrogen Per Acre. Note Lodging. Figiirf 7. Fil'tv i'ouiuis of iSitrogen Per Acre on the I^ei't, One Hundred Pounds of Nitrogen on the Right. M' ■t • a^-^-.f^, Figure 8. Invasion of Ked (Hover in Bromegrass Plots I'ertilized at the Rate of Fifty Pounds of Nitrogen Per Acre Per Year. Conclusions Yield: Broniegrass fertilized with high rates of nitrogen properly bal- anced with phosphorue and potassium produced the highest dry matter yield in the third stage of maturity. Nitrogen applied after the first cut- ting greatly increased the yield of the second cutting. Fertilization: The best results were obtained where nitrogen was ap- plied at the rate of seventy-five to one-hundred pounds per acre before the first cutting. After an early harvest ( middle of June I . fifty to seventy- five pounds of nitrogen per acre should be applied to encourage rapid growth of the second crop. Whei*e the nitrogen carrier is acid and ap- plied at a high rate, additional lime should l)e used. For, where a total of eight-hundred pounds of urea nitrogen was applied over a two year period the pH of the plots dropped from 6.2 to 5.5. Persistency : Without sufficient phosphorus and potassium, high rates of nitrogen resulted in severe lodging and a reduction in persistency. At the low rates of nitrogen, the persistency of the stand was lowered by the invasion of red clover. Figure 8. Protein: The protein content of broniegrass generally increased as the rate of nitrogen increased. II. Effect of Different Levels of Nitrogen Fertilization and Dates of Harvest on Nutritive Value of Bromegrass Hay Introduction Economical milk production depends on maximum use of home-grown feeds. The northeast is mainly a forage-growing section and in order for dairying to remain profital)le in this area it is necessary to continue to place more emphasis on maximum use of high quality forages grown in this section. In the last ten years the northeastern agricultural experi- ment stations have heen concerned with extensive studies related to the hreeding, persistency and nutritive evaluation of various forage crops adapted to this region. Because of the difficulty in holding stands of legumes in this area, the New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Sta- tion has centered its attention on certain grasses which appear to have possihilities of yielding large crops of high quality feed, if fertilized sufficiently, managed properly and harvested at the right stage of ma- turity. If a forage makes up a high percentage of the cow's ration, it must he high in feeding value, acceptahle by the animal, and produce a high yield per acre. Work done, at this station and elsewhere, clearly established that the early cutting of certain species of forage improves their nutritive value. The stage of growth in a forage greatly influences the acceptability of the forage bv the animal. Early-cut forage is much more acceptable to the animal than late-cut. Protein content is also higher per unit weight when the forage is harvested early. Digestibilities of protein and energ\', as determined by digestion experiments with dairy cattle, are signifi- cantly higher in early-cut forages as compared to the same forage when harvested at a later stage of maturity. Recent research has also indicated that liberal use of fertilizer in the soil increases dry matter yield per acre. There is limited information on the effects of such practices on the nutritive value, yield per acre, and persistency of the species of forage. To obtain answers to some of these questions, a cooperative study be- tween the Dairy Science, Agronomy, and Biochemistry departments was undertaken. The over-all objectives of this cooperative effort were: 1. To study the effect of different levels of nitrogen fertilization and date of cutting on the nutritive value of forage. 2. To study the effect of the above conditions on the yield of nutri- ents per acre and also on the persistency of the species of the forage. 3. To determine the nutritive value of the forage crops on the basis of digestible dry matter, total digestible nutrients, digestible protein and digestible energy. 11 Review of Literature Prince ct al. (8) reported dige*tion experiments conducted in 1931 by Ritznian and associates to compare the nutritive value of timothy hay cut June 20 and July 20. The digestihility of j)rotein decreased 15 per cent, the digestiliilitv of energy decrea'^ed 12 j)er cent and the daily l)al- ance of energy decreased from 5510 Calories to 1280 Calories in the late cut hay. Each of the four animals received about 20 pounds of hay daily as the sole ration. Observations after each feeding revealed that the animals accepted tlie earlier-cut hay much more readily than they did the hay that was cut July 20. Hay cut about August 7 from another por- tion of the same field, showed a digestibility of 32 per cent in the pro- tein. 49 per cent of energy, and tlie daily ])alance of energy about 1000 Calories which was an additional 17 percent decrease of the digestibility of the protein and a 6 per cent decrease in the energy lialance. Colovos et al. (3 I 1949 compared the nutritive value and acceptal)ility of timothy hay cut at different stages of maturity with clover hay. The results of this experiment showed a decrease in nutritive value similar to that in the experiment with timothy hay in 1931 at this Station. (8). Poulton et al. (7l 1957 reported the effect of nitrogen fertilization at levels of 100. 200. and 400 11). per acre on the nutritive evaluation of or- chardgrass hay. The hays thus grown were compared to alfalfa liay. The conclusion was tliat the total digestilile nutrients of the three orchard- grass liays were higher tlian the values found for alfalfa. Nellin et al. (6l 1960 studied the effects of date of harvest on tlie nu- tritive value of timothy. Climax timothy grown under 100 pounds per acre of 10-10-10 fertilizer was harvested at eleven stages of maturity be- ginning May 27 and ending August 5. Delayed harvest decreased the di- gestible energy and total digestible nutrients of the forage materially until the first week in July after which the decrease was not as pro- nounced. Browning et al. ( 1 ) 1960 reported that liberal nitrogen fertilization of Coastal Bermuda and Johnsongrass improved the feeding value and yield of the resulting hays. Spahr et al. (12) I960, noted that advancing stage of maturity of the forages tested resulted in lower daily milk production per cow and lower body weight gains when the forages were fed ad libitum as the only source of roughage. Chalupa et al. (2) 1961. studied the nutritive value of reed canary grass hays grown with 0 lb., 100 lb., and 200 lb. nitrogen per acre and compared them to alfalfa. Lloyd et al. (5) 1961. determined the effect of nutrient digestibility of timothy hay harvested at four stages of maturity and compared the nutritive value index of the hays. In general there was a decrease in the apparent digestibility of all fractions of timothy hay with increasing ma- turity. Experimental The nutritive evaluation of bromegrass hay grown under different levels of nitrogen fertilization was carried out over a three-year period. 12 1957 - 1958 The first hays, grown under two levels of nitrogen fertilization. 50 and 200 pounds per acre, were harvested at three stages of maturity during the Spring of 1957. The digestion balance experiments were run during the period of October 1957 and May 1958. The animals used in this experiment were identical twin Holstein steers. These same animals were used throughout the three years' experi- mental period. 1958-1959 The hromegrass hays for this year's experiments were grown under four levels of nitrogen fertilization, 50 lb.. 100 11)., 200 lb., and 400 lb. per acre, and harvested at three stages of maturity June 4. June 13. and June 23, 1958. Due to severe lodging in the 400 11). N acre, digestion balance experiments were run only on the June 4 cutting. The nutritive value of ten hays was determined during this year. Digestion balances were run fluring the period of September 1958 and June 1959. A second cutting of the crop on all fertilizations was made on July 20, 1958 on representative })lots to determine the total crop on each treat- ment but no digestion balances were obtained with the animals. 1959 - 1960 The experiment was repeated with the ten hays grown and harvested as in the previous years. A second cutting crop estimate was made on all fertilizations from representative plots harvested on July 20 as in the previous year. Digestion balances were run during the period of Septem- ber 1959 and June 1960. Procedures The procedure and methods followed in this experiment differed very little from those used in previous research reported from this laboratory except in the method of the excreta collection. A brief description of the procedure and methods is presented below together with the changes made. Feed The hays were chopped and mixed thoroughly before they were trans- ported into the laboratory in large burlap bags. The hays were fed to the animals twice a day at which time an aliquot sample was taken to com- posite it for analysis. A salt block was kept in front of each animal at all times. A preliminary period of 15-18 days was allowed before each di- gestion balance collection. Collection periods were of 8 days duration. During the collection peri- ods any refuse was carefully recovered, dried and compounded for an- alysis. Gross energy determinations of the feed and refuse were made by the use of an adiabatic bomb calorimeter. Proximate analyses were made on both feed and refuse. The nitrogen and the energy in the refuse were sub- 13 z u oc a. 72 68 64 60 73 69 65 61 57 53 70 66 62 58 1- 5f 7e 68 64 60 56 Dry /Matter NITRO&EN PER ACRE - 50 lb. Protein ENERS.Y Total Di&estible Nutrients June 1 June 10 June zo Figure 1. Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization and Stage of Maturity on Digestibilities. 14 tractcd from the amount fed in order to determine the protein and en- ergy consumed hy the animal and aL* r— ( 00 CO On '^ re f— I re (M O -^ re t^ re I— I re '^ 00 LC r- r— I NO ue NO LO -4— ■i— On to ^ re O' CO CC ^ 1— le re NO CO '^ c ue re t— NO tNj ON LC NO ^- in in ON CO O CO r^ NO ON ON re re CnI CNl On r^ Le -rt re (M 1—1 o 1—1 o m CO t^ in ■1- r— (M NO ON t^ in •- r- '- U, C O K! e i^ o-^ cu « "^ re en ++ On -* re ON NO t^ re 1— 1 1—1 CNI re re NO '* T? ON re Cn| t— re r— -* O rH 1— I Csl M (M CC CO O' CC I — I On CNI ue (M m '* t— re 1—1 -^ re ■J— •4— ^ 1— I re un "* in re CO ■<* "* CO o r- re •^ re oo o SSI CO IM in o On in in re r: z o CS o © ZZ a; OJ 03 53 c75 an, u rH cni re CO z o o Z ajj CO *H o o ZZ V V CO CO *^ *-* in cTi ■^ OS NO NO ■Tf OS NC rH •^ r— e-^^ in re CNI re csl rH in re ON ■^ ON in On NO 00 t— NO re ^^ "^ (M l—t o t— rH re «Nq ON CC r- CNI re re u •— ^