r s 581.529 ^ Vestern TechnoLosv and Engineerinet mi''^'' inc Rare plant inventory and plant connuni ty ■-.■I.- ..-'"^ i* ''S^^^^^^^^^E MONTANA STATE LIBRARY ^^^^fcr/o« MAR 1 2 2004 RARE PLANT INVENTORY AND PLANT CQ^-UNITY DESCE^IPTIONS OF THE SVJEET GRASS HILLS PROPOSED AREA OF CRITICAL ENVIRON^-EOTAL CO^JCERN (PACEC), TOOLE AND LIBERTY COUNTIES, NDNTANA Prepared for: L'nited States Department of Interior Bureau of Land Managsrent 812 14th Street North P.O. Box 2865 Great Falls, Montana 59401 Prepared by: Vfestem Technology and Engineering, Inc. P.O. Box 6045 Helena, Montana 59604 In Cooperation With: Montana Natural Heritage Program Montana State Library Building 1515 East 6th Avenue Helena, Montana 59620 ORDER.^r®. Mir950 - PH9 - 366 Decanber, 1989 CaVTENTS Page 1 . 0 INTRODUCTION ' 1 2 . 0 METHODS 3 3.0- RESULTS 5 3.1 RARE PL^M" EVALUATION ' . 5 3.1.1 Ranunculus cardiophyllus (Heart-leaved buttertrup) 5 " 3.1.2 Claytcnia lanceolata variety (Springbeauty) 7 3.1.3 Halimolobos virgata (?) (Tvri.ggy halimolobos) - 8 3.2 SPECIES LIST 8 • 3.3 VEGETATION TYPE DESCRIPTiaNS 11 3.3.1 Literature Review 11 3.3.2 Habitat/Ccmmunity Types of the Sweet Grass Hills 19 4 . 0 MANAGEKENT REOCM-ENDATIONS 31 5 . 0 LITERATURE CITED 34 APPENDICES APPENDIX A. VASCULAR PLANT SPECIES BY CLASS, SWEET GRASS HILLS, TOOLE COUNTY AND LIBERTY COUNTY, tCNTANA, 1989 A-1 APPENDIX B. PHOTOGRAPHS B-1 TABLES Paqe TABLE 1. Subalpire and alpine plant taxa v;hich may represent range extensions in the Sv;eet Grass Hills PACEC 10 TABLE 2. Habitat or ccjTTnunity types identified in or peripheral to the Sv;eet Grass Hills 20 TABLE 3. Percent cxrnposition (by v/eight) of three near-pristine sites in foothills grassland of the Svjeet Grass ' Hills . . 24 TABLE 4. Percent conposition (by v.'eight) of ijngrazed and grazed foothills prairie in the Sweet Grass Hills (Gold Butte cerretery) 25 FIGURES FIGURE 1. Sv;eet Grass Hills ertphasis area - surface a-.';rership map 2 FIGURE 2. Vegetation profiles along two north- south transects through the nxntane regions of East Butte 14 11 1.0 INTFDDUCTION' The Sv;eet Grass Hills proposed Area of Critical Environrrental Concern (PACEC) ccmprises about 3,220 hectares of Bureau of Land KanageiTent surface in Toole and Liberty counties of north-central Montana (Figure 1). The Hills are the smallest and, in many respects, the most isolated of the intrusive "island" mountain ranges of the northern Great Plains (Thcrrpson and Kuijt 1976a). High peaks rise abruptly from the surrounding prairie, supporting montane to sutelpine plant ccrmrunities . Elevations within the PACEC range frcm about 1340 m to over 2100 m en tog of Vfest Butte. The geographic position, rugged topography and elevational range support a diversity of plant ccnrnunities more closely related to the Rocky Mountains than the Northern Great Plains. The presence of both floras results in a unique ass3Tiblage of plant ccrrmunities . The purpose of this inventory was to assess the status of any rare plants potentially occurring within the PACEC. Secondary objectives v.'ere to generate a cctrprehensive species list and briefly describe the major plant carrnunities of t2~e PACEC. 2.0 METHODS Tasks ccnpleted prior to the field inventory included: 1. Search of Montana Natural Heritage Program data base to determine rare plants previously identified in the area. 2. Review of local and regional literature regarding rare plants and plant ccmmunities pertinent to the area. 3. Cbtain USGS topographic iraps and outline PACEC boundaries. 4. Ccxitact landc^,Ters and obtain acosss across private lands. Field work was ccrducted June 13-14, 1989 ard July 18-21, 1989. The range of vegetaticxi types en West, East and Middle (Gold) Buttes was surveyed by pedestrian reccxinaissance. Species lists v^ere made at selected locations; taxa not readily identified in the field were collected and pressed for verification in the office. Photograjiis were taken of representative plant ocnnmunities . The site previously recorded for Ranunculus cardic^yllus Hock. (Thcnpscn and Kuijt 1975b) was intensively surveyed, although it is located outside the PACEC boundary. Likely habitats for R. cardicphyllus within the PACEC were also inventoried. Plant specimens \-^£re identified in the office using a stereozocm dissecting microscope. Taxonomic manuals used for plant identification included Hitchcock and Crcnquist (1973), Hitchcock et al. (1955-59), Dom (1984), Great Plains Flora Associaticn (1986) and Scoggan (1978). 3.0 RESULTS 3.1 PJ^FE PLJ^KT EV?lLiATION Lesica et al. (1934) list 34 vascular plant species of limited distribution in the north-central region of Montana. Of those listed, only one, heart-leaved buttercup (Ranunculus cardiophyllus ) vras listed by Thcrrpson and Kuijt (1975b) as occucring in the S\veet Grass HilJ,s. Because of the relative paucity of botanical information for the Hills, all species not readily identified in the field were collected to evaluate other potentially rare taxa, and to obtain as ccnplete a species list as possible. Three species have been identified as meriting additional investigation: heart-leaved buttercup, springbeauty (Claytcma lanceolata Pursh var. flava (A. Nels.) C.L. Hitcho. ) and t\-7iggy halimolobos (Halimolobos virgata) (Nutt. ) Schulz. 3.1.1 Ranunculus cardiophyllus (Heart-leaved buttercup) F?anunculus cardio^T/Uus has been recorded frcm only six locations in Montana: four staticns in Glacier County, one in Stveetgrass County, and one in Toole County (Montana Natural Heritage Progra-n database, Helena . ) The locaticn din Toole County is frcm the Vtest Butte in the S\-,eet Grass Hills, erd \s'as collected by Miller and Hassinger (4828) on West Butte on June 30, 1975. The collection site ;-;as described as a "flat, exposed, meaoa.sy area near Fred and George Creek" (University of Lethbridge herbarium label ) . Hitchcock and Cronquist (1973) list heart-leaved buttencup as occurrirg in rrountain rreada.'.'S frcm British Columbia to Alberta and Sasl:on is apparently poorly understood (Welsh et al. 1987) and is similar to R^ inamoenus Greene and R^ pedatifidus Smith. It is considered by Scoggan (1978) to be a variety of R. pedatifidus. Heart- leaved buttercup has been reported for both the Saskatcha-ran and Alberta portions of the Cypress Hills, approximately 112 km northeast of the Svjeet Grass Hills (Breitung 1954; de Vries and Bird 1968). To the rorthv?est, Kuijt (1982) lists the species as occurring on rather dry grassy meadot^ra at lcf,-7 elevations in Watertcn Lakes National Park. Moss (1959) lists heart-leaved buttercup as ccnmon in moist prairie and mountain rreadows of Alberta, ^vtdle Locman and Best (1979) report the species as unocrrmDn in v.^stem parklands of the Canadian prairie provinces. In the Cypress Hills, it is ccrrmon in grasslands of the plateau (Breitung 1954). Habitat affinity for heart-leaved buttercup changes frcm north to south. In the north it is characterized as occurring primarily in mountain iTeadCTv's at lav to mid-elevations (Hitchcock and Cronquist 1973, Kuijt 1982, Vteber 1975, Van Bruggen 1976, Harrington 1964 and Dom 1988). In Arizona, ha-^ver, it is found in pine forests frcm 7,CX)0 to 9,500 feet (Kearney and Peebles 1960). Vfest Butte v.-as revisited in an atterrpt to relocate hsart-leaved buttercup. Several Ranunculus specimens v.'ere collected, but R. cardiophyllus v.-as not found. Given the inprecise location reported on the herbarium label frcm the previous collection, a gereral site traverse was conducted in suitable habitats in and near the PACBC. The veracity of the previous collection is not questioned; failure to relocate the population may indicate that it is very small, or that it has been extirpated. Also, the previous collection may have been made on private land outside the Sv/eet Grass Hills PACEC. 3.1.2 Claytcnia lanceolata variety (Springbeauty) Springbeauty (Claytcsiia lanceolata var. flava) is listed as critically imperiled in Montana because of extreme rarity; it is designated "C2" by t±>e U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (current information indicates that proposing to list as endangered or threatened is possibly appropriate but substantial biological infoxmation is not on file to support an iirrrediate ruling); and as sensitive by the U.S. Forest Service (Shelly 1989). Claytonia lanceolata is ccmrron in the Hills and several specirrens v;ere collected. Specirrens collected have v.Mte floisers and narrow leaves, and may represent either variety multiscapa or a v;hite form of variety flava (Shelly pers. ccrnn. ). Systematic studies of these ta>3, by J.S. Shelly and P. Lesica, ere not yet ccnpleted, and a positive identification cannot te irade at this tirre. Upon ccnpletion of these studies, the Montana Natural Heritage Rnogram v;ill update the Bureau of Land t>^anagement as to the identification of these plants. The taxon is ccmrron on East and Vfest Buttes in grassland habitats, and no imrediate threats are apparent. 3.1.3 Hali'molobos virgata (?) ( Tv;iggy halimolobos ) Plant specimens tentatively identified as tv;iggy halimolobos \ l-\l^' "" ( Halimolobos virgata) v/ere collected near a rock outcrop en foothills north of Mount Brcs-n in the East Butte area. The specimens depart from A^ the published species descriptions, in having pubescent siliques and shorter petals. Specimens are beirg sent to the New— York— Botanic :'xt^ i'i^>^^'.'Jv.w '\ 1 ' V / Garden- for verification. Shelly (pers. ccnrn. , Etecenber, 1989) also \- ,,■ collected specimens tentatively identified as Halimolobos from the Bull _ \ River in northwestern Montana. If correctly identified, these collections represent new state records for Montana. Twiggy halimolcixs is previously documented frcm open prairies to la.',er mountains, ficm Yukon to Aiberta and Saskatche;-ran, south to eastern Idaho, Wycming, Utah and Colorado (Hitchcock and Cronquist 1973). 3.2 SPECIES LIST Thcrpson and Kuijt (1976b) prepared a comprehensive species list for the S\seat Grass Hills during their investigations in 1972-1975. Hagener (1972) and Hagener and Hagener (1977) list common plants of north-central I-'ontana. ^pendix A lists plant species encountered during the 1989 rare plant inventory. Appendix A also lists additional species recorded for the Sweet Grass Hills area by Thcnpson and Kuijt (1976b), but v.-hich v/ere not observed in the rare plant inventory conducted by VJESTECH. A total of 339 species v;ere recorded, of v±iich 71 were gramiroids, 228 \'?er^ forbs, 27 v;erB Icf^i shrubs and subshrubs and 13 v.ere trees and tall shrubs. Seme of the taxa listed by Thcrtpson and Kuijt (1976b) may not occur vd-thin the PACEC boundaries surveyed by VESTECH; ha.'^ver they are at least proxirral and are included in Appendix A since many of these species are expected to occur in the PACEC. Although very few rare plant species have been listed for the Sv^eet Grass Hills and vicinity (Lesica et al. 1984), a number of taxa are of phytogeographical interest due to island biogeography considerations. Sore species within the PACEC which may represent range extensions of subalpine/alpine taxa are included in Table 1. Thcrrpson and Kuijt (1976a) listed cordilleran species of phytogeographic interest in the a-reet Grass Hills. Table 1. Subalpins and alpine plant ta: 0 v_ c V_ ii 0 iS 0 0 00 — to 0 Gras Rubb c 0 D. 10- CD ■3 0 0 > >• < Q z < ^ ^ ^ < [tJ9|»u;] uoijOAdig (fj9)»u;j uoiiOA^ig 14 Creek and SirnTDns Creek. Understory ccnsists largely of dense shrubbery including Rocky Mountain maple, serviceberxy, dcgvxDod, hav/thom, chokecherry and v;illcws. Potholes and reservoirs. Saiall glacial kettles, from a f&^ square meters to several hectares, are found as high as 1300 m and are abundant north and west of East Butte. Pcnds are shallow, and most are usually dry by late July. Scrre sutport cattail, rushes, bulxushes and sedges. Since no natural lakes or marshes are found within the Hills prcper, natural wetland ccrrmunities similar to marshes of the Cypress Hills (Breitung 1954) are absent from the Sweet Grass Hills. MKTANE COvNUNITIES Nfcntane grassland. Dry south- facing slopes and foothills between 1500 and 2000 m, and many ncn-forested portions of north-faciiX[ slcpes, are dcminated by rough fescue, Idaho fescue and shrubby cinquef oil . Subalpine grassland. Small grassland areas above timberline on the sumnaits of Kjount Royal and Viest. Butte appear distinct frcrn the Ic^-^r-elevation mcntane grassland, and somewhat resemble alpire turdra. Caespitose vegetaticn is dcminated by stunted rough fescue and shrubby cinquef oil, with American bistort a irejor 15 ccmpo-ent. A more rroist grassland found on the ste^, shady north face of Mount Royal is dcminated by sedge species. Douglas-fir forest. Douglas-fir forest ccnprises the la,-«st coniferous forest of the Hills. Pcnderosa pine, more carmen in other isolated mountain rarges, is absent; apparently, base elevations of the Hills are above the cold limits of pcrderosa pine. The understory of Douglas-fir forest is the most developed of all coniferous forests found in the Hills. Shrubs are abundant, including serviceberry, Oregon grape, prince's pine, ocmmcn juniper, russet buffal(±eny and v^iite spirea. Ccnspicuous forbs include bluntleaf sandwort, orange arnica, clematis, spotted coralrodt, Virginia strawberry, northern bedstxaw, Richardscn's geranium, stcrecrop, starry Solcmcn's seal and rreadcwrue. A drier Douglas-fir savannah occurs on some south slcpes, while Douglas- fir and limber pine are found en the rocky, Icwer south slope of Vfest Butte. Limber pine woodland. Limber pine occurs alcrg forest edges throughout the montane region, forming pure stands en dry ridges east of KDunt Brown. Lodgepole pine forest. Dense, even-aged stands of lodgepole pire occur en steeper, north-facing slopes from 1500 to 2100 m. The understory is sparse and includes heart-leaved arnica, twinflcwer, white spirea, sidecells pyrola, ore-flas'ered wintergreen, green 16 wintergreen, dwarf huckleberry, blue huckleberry, myrtle huckleberry and grouse v;hortleberry. Spruce-lodgepole pire forest. This type is found en north-facing slopes ard alcxg streams from 1600 to 2100 m on East Butte cxily. Lodgepole pine ard spruce dcminate a sparse understory similar in ccmpositicn to the lodgepole pine forest. Temperate subalpire fir forest. Subalpine fir and spruce dcminate steep, shady north-facing slcpes from 1650 to 1800 m above Rittocn Gulch (west side of East Butte). This unusually low-elevation oocurrence of subalpine fir rray be due to cold air drainage down the canycn. Scattered lodgepole pine and Douglas-fir are found in the type. Tne understory includes Rocky fountain maple, harebell, fireweed, twinflower, one-flowered wintergreen, russet buffaloberry and grouse whorU-eberxy. Subalpine forest. V/hitebark pine is a major conpcrient of forests near the sunmits of Nfeunt Brcwn and Mount Royal. Lodgepole pine, limber pire, spruce, and, en the north face of Mount Brown, subalpine fir also occur. These stands are apparently above the cold limits of Dcxiglas-fir. VJhitebark pine and lodgepole pine dominate forest stands at timber line en the summit of Vtest Butte. On Vfest Butte, subalpine fir is found only en the dry, rocky ridge south of the summit, v^-^ere its stunted, wind-blo^sTi form resembles 17 kxummholz. Understory plants acre virtually absent frcm most subalpine forest stands. Aspen groveland. Groves of aspen surrouri^ed by grassland are found up to 1800 m. These stands support a dense understory of herbaceous and shruMDy species, and are similar to the aspen groveland described by Lynch (1955) on the east slcpe of tie Rockies. Aspen woodland. Clcnes of aspen occur within the Douglas-fir forest at elevations between about 1400 and 1600 m. These stands have understories similar to the Douglas- fir forest and prcbably represent a fire-caused serai stage. Mountain ravines. In the higher mcntane regions, between 1500 and 2000 m, major streams flew through steep rocky ravines. These ravines are generally bordered by coniferous forest and support stands of aspen and Rocky Mountain maple. Rubble slopes . ' Higher montane steep slcpes v;ith loose, lichen- covered rocks (1 to 4-dm diameter) are sparsely vegetated, occasicnally supporting clunps of spruce or lodgepole pine. Other species found on these rul±)le slopes Include sulfur buckwheat, klnikinnick, matted saxifrage and raspberry. 18 Several vegetaticn inventories of other isolated mountain ranges in Montana ard Canada may be pertinent to the Sv;eet Grass Hills. The flora of the Cypress Kills has been described by Breitung (1954), deVries and Bird (1968) and Newscme and Dix (1968). Forest habitat types of the Bear's Pav; Mountains have been classified by Roberts and Sibibemsen (1979a) and Roberts (1980). Forest habitat types of the Little Rocky Kjountaip.s have also been classified by Rcterts and Sitbemsen (1979b) and Rtierts (1980). Culv;ell et al. (1989) have described vegetation types of a porticxi of the Little Rocky Mountains. Forest habitat types of tl^ Blackfeet Indian Reservation have been classified by Cooper (1981), and Lynch (1955) has inventoried aspen groveland in Glacier County, Montana. Table 2 lists habitat types and ccnrnunity types reported in pertinent vegetaticn inventories. 3.3.2 Habitat/CoTTTiunity Types of the Sv.eet Grass Hills A preliminary assessrrent of habitat/oGrrmunity types of the PACEC is possible utilizing general descriptions provided by Thcmpscn and Kuijt (1976a), qualitative notes frcm the rare plant inventory, and extrapolaticn of reports from adjacent, isolated mountain ranges. This assessment of types —List be cansidered speculative given the lack of quantitative ecological data. Photographs of representative vegetaticn types are presented in Arpendix B. 19 i m 4-' CO 0 at u (C *M JC c u a a ^ r-4 •c C3 c »-< O -t K a o o a 2: ■Q O X 3 X 4-> _2 CT I4 3 U *J <0 u i-) CT ^ J= 0 a 1 « f •a d U ja -H t> -a £ T3 c u 3 ^ a u «-^ c 5 C a X .H 0 □ -< \ ej c .-) 3 J3 D c -I « C U C U > O iJ O 3 C £ J 01 -^ O « 3 W C 3 -H O « e J} 3 « C 3 0 cr '-I c 3 0 __;^ 0 -o v< JZ iJ e *J X X ft) 0 c J^ 'J JZ 0 j: u Ji U 4 3 " iJ u u u 0 U *J ^ Si >, "V. >» •^ V '^ ■^ \ iJ ^ "N^ ■^ X u u u u. n u c U • U X u ■-* u .^ u .^ 0 .H c —4 X •-^ -H -< •3 a 4M 0 1-) u 1-1 M H^ (M JJ Vl «-l 0 J3 1 Si 1 _4 1 -i: 1 ft) 1 0 1 1 c J u 3 a > a *H ta c (0 .-1 e c 3 0 0 0 c ki 0 c c 0 0 0 c c r» c c ^ 0 ^ •H w u •H -H —< ^^ 0 u> w 0 01 a CT ji: D> D» tn > Di 0 •3 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 20 a -I •H -a o c o -< AJ 0 r u — . o. — u \ a \ u CO c c • c c 3 ■ 0. -^^ . iJ C X X 0 u u e tl r-i 0 0 J •H ■H u jj 0 a L. •X. c -H jj V u 0 J= •-4 o CT ■^ E c a «H 0 0 • JZ u « o u -* c u J3 >• c >. u « H o u en ji: N U 6 u ti u _4 V Q e V c « JT a Z O O 3 O e O C ^avjzvoa:x C7^ CT a -o T D* U D> JJ V V C O V to U 3 u o 3-^33 [1. c a c a tr a --H 3 >-< o d c c c a c. -t 3 3 -< 3 a a o 2 C O C O -< < W X -< CI J3 M Q. -^ > "X J3 3 < < c e 21 •a a c O o» O -I a ~ -< •a 3 c C » I. J3 C 0. ^ a a >• >i = w >• " a o c c ^ e 0. €> J3 E O I a c a u u -H 4J q: 3 E -1 O O "O -H S S C X O O u r^ c o u r-* c O^ 0 c o o ^^ O « J3 rH c E XI -c — X z -o « o ■" s: -I « .-" c >i Id r-4 o CO J3 a j: u 0. -I flJ J >-. t) -» -H u CO u c3 J a tl ^ a a O J3 O 3 (J IS 22 GRASSLAND TfPES Prairie grassland. Several types potentially occur in the prairie surrouTiiing the Sv/eet Grass Hills; however, the PACEC is primarily above elevaticns characteristic of Northern Great Plains prairie associaticns . AJ^sence of fescue species differentiates the prairie grassland from foothills, montane and subalpine grasslands. Ecminant species include wheatgrasses (primarily western in association with thickspike and bluebunch), needlegrasses (primarily needle-and-thread with seme green needlegrass ) , blue grama and dryland sedges (threadleaf ard needleleaf ). Foothi 1 1 s grassland . This type is dominant in the Buttes iirmediately above prairie grassland. Fescues doninate most stands. Table 3 presents qualitative data en ccnpositicn of three ... vicinity stands sanpled by Ross et al. (1973) in their assessnent of near-pristine sites in Mcntana. Each site is clearly dcminated by rough fescue. Idaho fescue is present in each stand, but ccnpositicn is lew. Perennial forbs contribute 4 to 10 percent ccnpositicn by v.eight. The foothills grassland most closely fits the rough fescue/Idaho fescue habitat type of. Mueggler and Stewart (1980). It differs in the ftLlls by a paucity of Idaho fescue and perennial forbs, and a very high ccnpositicn of rough fescue. Table 4 presents a ccnpariscn of ungrazed and grazed stands at the Gold Butte Coretery (Ross et al. 1973). Needle-and-thread, not recorded in the ungrazed stand, increased 23 Table 3. Percent ccnposition (by v«ight) of three near-pristire sites in foothills grassland of the Sv.ieet Grass Hills (Ross et al. (1973)). Species Gold Butte CefTetery Rough fesov^. 80 Ifiaho fescue T VtestPtn & Thickspike wheatyi-ass 5 Green needlegrass 5 Cusick bluegiciss T Threadleaf sedge T Perennial forbs 10 Annuals and hipnm'al.c? T Thcnpson Ranc±i SE of Whitlash 92 2 T 1 T 5 Osvcod F?arch SE of VJhitlash 93 1 Prairie rose 1 4 T 1 24 Table 4. Percent ccrposition (by weight) of ungrazed and grazed foothills prairie in the Sweet Grass Hills (Gold Butte Canetexy) (Ross et al. (1973)). Species Ungrazed Grazed Rough rescue 80 5 Idaho fescue T Western wheatgrass 5 5 Green needlegrass 5 Threadleaf sedge T 5 Needle-and-thread 50 Prairie junegrass 15 Cusick bluegrass T Perennial forbs 10 15 Annuals T 3 Brocm snakeweed 2 25 to 50 percent ccrrposition (by v^eight) vath grazing. Ptough fescue decreased dramatically with grazing frcm 80 to 5 percent cornposition, indicating a grazing-induced serai ccmmunity daninated by needle-and- thread. This grazing response also indicates a substantial deviation frcm I-lisggler and Stew-art's (1980) rough fescue/Idaho fescue habitat type, since their paired stands for the type do not shew needle- and- thread as a primary increaser. Grassland similar to the rough fescue/bluebunch wheatgrass habitat type was observed en slightly drier sites. It is likely that additicxial investigaticns will delineate several associations for foothills grassland, reflecting the range of site differences within this zone. Mcntane grassland . As in the foothills grassland zone, rough fescue is the dominant species over most of the montane grassland. Potential habitat types within this zore include: Rough fescue/ Idaho fescue Rough fescue/bluebunch wheatgrass Idaho fescue/bluebunch v^eatgrass These types were identified by Culwell et al. (1989) in the montane zone of the Little Rocky Fountains. Qualitative 26 observations indicate ccmpositional differences frcrr, :-l:eggler and Stewart's (1980) tj^pes. The rough fescue/bluebunch '.•.rsatgrass and Idaho fescue/bluebunch v;heatgrass types are much rore limited than the rough fescue/Idaho fescue type in the Sv;eet Grass Hills. Subalplne grassland. The subalpins grassland is limited to relatively small areas above timber line on the sumrits of Kount Royal and West Butte. Ftough fescue is dcminant in scrre stands, but ccrTTTiunity stature and associated species ccnpositicn indicate dissimilarities vdth mcntane grassland. Tvro tentative types based on Thompson and Kuijt's (1976a) description are rough fescue/ shrubby cinquefoil and sedge rveado^i. Idaho fescue and shruttoy cinquefoil are dcminant on the top of Mt. Royal, suggesting a third type (possibly a serai phase of the rough fescue type ) . Herbaceous species indicative of the subalpine zone are listed in Table 1. UPLAND SHRUB Shrubby cinquefoil grassland. Relative cover of shrubby cinquefoil in sctre areas warrants separation fran grassland types. Rough fescue, usually the dcminant grass, identifies the shrubby cinquefoil/rough fescue habitat type of Mieggler and Stewart (1980). Idaho fescue is dcminant in other stands, implying a shrul±y cinquef oil/Idaho fescue type. Since shrubby cinquefoil generally increases with grazing, additional investigations ^ould be required to determine ^-rf^ether the t^pe is 27 climax or a grazing-irduced serai cxxmunity in 1±e Sv^eet Grass Hills. Western sro'.-berTy/rose. Sv.'ales, upland drainages and other sna.v acxrijmulation areas support a la,'/ shrub type dominated by v^estem snc^±)erTY and rose. Understory species are similar to the adjacent grasslands v/ith higher abundance of rresic-site species. Kentucky bluegrass has generally invaded these stands. oo^^:FEROUs forest and savannah types Limber pine series . Limber pine is present as a codcminant or subdcminant in the Douglas-fir series, and forms pure stands on dry ridges east of Mt. Brc^•n. Limt)er pine stands are frequently open, appearing as a woodland or savannah. Idato fescue is the dcminant understory species, ijiplying the limber pine/Idaho fescue type of Pfister et al. (1977). Douglas-fir series. Douglas-fir occurs as dense forests on north- facing aspects at la^/er elevations and as a savannah on drier south- facing slopes. It is a serai ccrrponent of higher elevation forest in the spruce or subalpine fir series. Thcrpson and Kuijt (1976a) describe the understory as the most well-developed of coniferous types in the Hills. Etouglas-fir types described for the Bear's Paw r-'ountains and Little Rocky Fountains that may be present in the Si-.-eet Grass Hills include Douglas-fir/westem 28 snovjberry, Douglas-fir/sexviceberry, Douglas- fir/kinikinnick, Douglas-fir/Oregon grape, Douglas-fir/Canac3a violet, Douglas- fir/ t-v;infla.'.'er and Douglas- fir /burx^hterxy dogvxxx3. Lodgepple pine series . Lodgepole is extensive at mid to upper elevations on cool, mesic slopes. It is likely serai, related to fire history. Succession rrey be very slo,'/, hov^ver, reflecting possible soil loss follc^^ing extensive bums. Understory is depauperate, iraking classification difficult. Types that may be present include lodgepole pine/twinflo/,er, lodgepole pine/mixed shrub, lodgepole pine/huckleberry species, and lodgpole pine/ccnrron juniper. Spruce series. Spruce is found on East Butte (Figure 2) at mid to upper elevaticns. Potential types include spruce/tvrinflc^•.■er, spruce/ccmnxDn juniper and perhaps spruce/matted clematis on limestone substrates. Subalpine fir series. Subalpine fir/carmon juniper and subalpine fir/twinf lower are found in the Bear's Paw Mountains (Roberts, 1980), and nay be present in the S\-.eet Grass Hills. Other possible subalpine fir types include subalpine fir/grouse whortleberry and subalpine fir-^siTitebark pine at the highest elevaticns. 29 DECIDUOUS FOREST ^■spen series. Aspen cccurs as groves surrounded by grassland, and as voDdland in coniferous forest. Understory is dense and diverse. Possible types include aspen/si'ieetroot in the groves and aspen/ tv7infloi',er or aspen/westem srov-iDerry in the coniferous forest. i scree/t;^xus/rcck outcrop Most rocky slopes are poorly vegetated and can be designated technically as scree, talus or rock outcrop. Scattered trees occur en seme rocky slopes and may be designated as limber pine/ scree, spruce/scree or lodgepole pine/scree, depending on tree species dcminance. 30 4.0 KANAGEKENT RBCa-MENDATIONS Rare plants Field investigaticns should be ccntinued to determine the status of heart-leaved buttercup in the Sv-eet Grass Hills. Bureau of Lard Nfanagement or contract botanists should periodically ccnduct botanical investigations during spring or early summer to determine if heart- leaved buttercup is present in the PACBC. Investigaticns should be conducted prior to any changes in land management policies that might affect the taxcn. If no threats are posed to suitable habitat, the priority for additicnal investigaticns is considered lew. Because access is limited, and the Hills are rugged, a detailed field inventory to document the status of heart-leaved buttercup will require a substantial field effort. The status of springbeauty and twiggy halimolcfcos should be determined following verification of the voucher specirrens. Habitat type descriptions Habitat types of the Sv,eet Grass Hills have not been quantitatively described. Previous investigaticns by Thcnpscn and Kuijt (1976a) have been qualitative. Although plant ccmmunities in the ?iills resemble seme habitat types described for I-tntana by Pfister et al. (1977) and Mueggler and Stewart (1980), neither study specifically addressed or sampled types within the Hills. Sana similarities are apparent with other prairie mountain ranges in north-central ^tntana; hois'sver, each range ccntains unique types. A detailed quantitative evaluaticn of 31 habitat types of the Hills vould alla^ caorparison with otr»2r isolated mountain ranges (e.g. Bears Paw Mountains and Little Rocky .'-'ountains ) , and identify unique tyx^es that may merit protection or special management. Vegetation mapping Vegetatia-i mapping was beyond the scqpe of the rare plant inventory. Mapping of general vegetaticn types identified by Thcrrpscn ard Kuijt (1976) could be accctrplished using aerial ji^otographs and field verificaticn. Preparation of a habitat type map would be of more value to land management decisions. Noxious weeds Three state- listed noxious weeds were encountered en the PACEC during the rare plant inventory: leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula), spotted knap;';eed (Centaurea maculosa), and Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Identified populaticns included: Leafy Spurge - two locations on l-fest Butte: ere in the tottcm of Pratt Canyon bordering ccniferous forest (10m by 10m) and ere along a mining road en the west side of West Butte (Im x 5m); Spotted knapweed - A sizeable population on the edge of the quarry en the east side of East Butte - isolated plants were pulled; Canada thistle - A small population in a drainage north of Mount Brcxsn in a moderately to heavily grazed pasture. Reocmmsndations for noxious weed control include: 32 1) Conduct additional surveys to identify populations of noxious weeds. 2) Mali tor knom populations. 3) Selectively spray the quarry area for spotted knapweed. 4) Mechanically control isolated populations of spotted knap;';eed by hand pullirg. 5) Consider spot spraying of Canada thistle and/or modificaticns to the grazing plan. 33 5.0 LITERATURE CITED Breitung, A.J. 1954. A botanical survey of thie Cypress Hills. Can. Field-Natural. 68:55-92. Cooper, S.V. 1981. Forest habitat types of the Blackfeet Indian Reservation. In coop with Intermountain For. and Range Exp. Stn. Forest Sci. Lab, R.D. Pfister. Prep, for Bur. Ind. Affairs, Wind River Agency, Fort V/ashakie, t'^ycming. 87 p. + apperd. Culv^ell, L.D., K.L. Sco;-/ and L.A. Larsen. 1989. Vegetation resources of the Landusky and Zortman life-of-mine area. Little Rocky Mountains, Montana. Tech I^t. for Zortman Mining, Inc. by VESTBCH, Helena, Mcxitana. 40 p. + append. deVries, B. and CD. Bird. 1968. Additions to the vascular flora of the Cypress Hills, Albei-fca. Blue Jay 26:98-100. Dom, R.D. 1977. Flora of the Black Hills. Publ. by R.D. and J.L. Dom. 377 p. Dom, R.D. 1984. Vascular plants of Mcntana. Mtn. Vfest Publ., Cheyenne, VJycming. 175 p. Dom, R.D. 1988. Vascular plants of Wyoning. Mtn. West Publ., Cheyenne, V^ycming. 340 p. Great Plains Flora Associaticn. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Univ. Press of Kansas, Lav/rence. 1392 p. Hagener, L.W. 1972. Wild flowers, shrubs and trees of north central Mcntana. Botany Dept., Northern Mcntana College. Ashtcn Printing, Butte, I-fcntana. 79 p. Hagener, L.V/. and A.R. Hagener. 1977. Free for all - edible and useful wild plants of north central Montana. Hill County Printing Co., Havre, Montana. 76 p. Hansen, P.L., S.W. Chadde and R.D. Pfister. 1988. Riparian dominance types of Nixitana. Misc. Publ. No 49. Montana Forest and Ccnserv. Exp. Station, School of Forestry, Univ. of Mcxitana, Missoula. 411 p. Harrington, H.D. 1964. Manual of the plants of Colorado. Auth. by the Colorado State Board of Agriculture and prepared with the cooperation of Colorado State Univ. The Swallow Press, Inc., Chicago. 666 p. Hitchcock, C.L., A. Cronquist, M. CXvnbey and J.W. Thcrpson. 1955-1969. Vascular plants of the Pacific Northwest. Vols. 1-5, Univ. of Washington Press, Seattle. 34 Hitchcxxi<, C.L. and A. Cronquist. ' 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. Urav. of VJashington Press, Seattle, Washington. 730 p. Kearney, T.H. end R.H. Peebles (eds). 1960. Arizona flora. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley. 1085 p. Kuchler, A.W. 1964. Potential natural vegetation of the ccnterminous Untied States (rrap). An-erican Geograf^iic Society, special publication No. 36. Kuijt, J. 1982. A flora of Vfetertcn Lakes National Park. Univ. of Alberta Press, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 584 p. Lesica,, P., G. t-toore, K.M. Petersen and J.H. Rurrely. 1984. Vascular plants of limited distrihuticn in Montana. Koitana Academy of Science r-fcn. No. 2. 61 p. Locman, J. and K.F. Best. 1979. Budd's flora of the Canadian praixie provinces. Res. Branch Agriculture Canada, Publ. 1662, Ottawa. 863 p. Lynch, D. 1955. Ecology of the aspen groveland in Glacier County, Mcxitana. Ecological t'fcnographs 25:322-345. Moss, E.H. 1959. Flora of Alberta. Univ. of Toronto Press. Toronto. 546 p. Mueggler, W.F. and W.L. Stewart. 1980. Grassland and shrubland habitat types of western Kcxitana. USDA Forest Service, Cgden, Utah. General Tech. Rept. I^)T-66. 154 pp. Newscme, R.D. and R.L. Dix. 1968. The forests of the Cypress Hills, Alberta and Saskatchewan, Canada. American Midland Naturalist 80:118- 185. Payne, G.F. 1973. Vegetative rangeland types in Montana. Montana Agricultural Experirrent Station Bulletin 671. ^fcntana State Univ., Bozeman. Pfister, R.D., B.L. Kovalchick, S.F. Amo and R.C. Presby. 1977. Forest habitat types of Montana, USDA Forest Service. General Tech. Report INT-34. Roberts, D.W. 1980. Forest habitat types of the Bear's Paw Mountains and Little Rocky Mountains, Montana. Master's Thesis. University of M:xitana, Missoula. 116 p. Rci)erts, D.W. and J.I. Sibbemsen. 1979a. Forest habitat types of the Bear's Paw Mountains. Unpublished report on file at the Montana Forest and Conservation Experirrent Station, Univ. of Montana, Missoula. Unpaged. 35 Ftoberts, D.W. and J.I. SUbbemsen. 1979b. Forest and woodland habitat types of north-central Montana. Vol. 1. The Little Rod^INOIDS Agrcpyron caninum Agropyron dasystachyua Agropyron splcatum Agrostis scabra Agrostis thurberiana* Alopecurus aequalis Bouteloua gracilis BroBus carlnatus Broaus ciliatus* Calanagrostis canadensis Calamagrostis purpurascens Calamagrostis rubescens Carex albonigra* Carex aquatilis* Carex athrostachya Carex atrata* Carex aurea Carex caplllaris Carex eleocharls* Carex filifolla Carex hoodi i Carex hystricina £?)• Carex nicroptera Carex nebrascensis Carex obtusata Carex parryana* Carex pensylvanica Carex petasata Carex phaeocephala* Carex raynoldsii Carex ros s i i Carex s Icca t a Carex sprengelil Carex xerantica Catabrosa aquatica Danthonia californica Danthonia inte media Deschampsla cespitosa Festuca idahoensis Festuca ovina Festuca scabrella ,:••- ■e^ «•-■ -«' aT;:--' V* e^? J, ».v- V"-^-^*t igj"':;,".- -'■ Wi .>^fr-.--.. ■ SjV'* ^f(l 'a;S^- ■ ?* -5* i::;^'" I Q) 3