A TAXONOMIC REVISION OF THE GENUS CHAMAESYCE (EUPHORBIACEAE) IN THE CARIBBEAN By DEREK GEORGE BURCH A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE COUNQL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA August, 1%5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I should like to express my thanks to Dr. Daniel B, Ward for his advice and helpful criticism in his capacity as Chairman of the supervisory committee for this study. I should also like to thank the other members of the committee, Dr. W. 0. Ash and Dr. D. A. Roberts, for reading and evaluating the manuscript. I am grateful to the Curators and staff of the herbaria listed in the introduction for lending their material, including type- specimens, for use in this study, and my thanks are also due to Mr. W. T. Stearn of the British Museum (Natural History) and Dr. R. K. Rechinger of the Naturhi stor i skmuseum, Vienna, for searching their collections for additional specimens of interest. The Department of Botany and the Graduate School of the Uni- versity of Florida contributed to the expenses of a visit to several important European herbaria, which added greatly to the coverage of this work. Finally, my thanks are due to the anonymous assistants for the final stages of the preparation of the dissertation, and particularly to my wife Nancy, who rounded out two years of "herbarium-widowhood" by finding out just how 1 had been spending my nights during that time. All photographic work in the dissertation was done by Mr. Jerry Uelsmann, and I am grateful to him both for the long hours of work that went into the plates, and for their leavening effect in the mass of text. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii LIST OF MAPS vl LIST OF PLATES vili INTRODUCTION 1, GENERAL DISCUSSION k. I. HISTORY k. II, THE SEGREGATION OF THE GENUS CHAMAESYCE 10. III. MORPHOLOGY \k. SYSTEMATIC TREATMENT 21. Chamaesyce 21 . Key to the species of Chamaesyce in the Caribbean 23. 1 . Chamaesyce vaq i nul ata 29. 2. Chamaesyce a rt i cu lata 33. 3. Chamaesyce buxi fol ia 36. 4. Chamaesyce lecheo ides A-2. 5. Chamaesyce cayensis 51. 6. Chamaesyce porter iana 5^. 7. Chamaesyce myrt i 1 1 i fol ia 63. 8. Chamaesyce nutans 65. 9. Chamaesyce hyper ici fol ia 71. TABLE OF CONTENTS, Continued SYSTEMATIC TREATMENT, Continued Page Chamaesyce 10. Chamaesyce hyssop! fol ia 76. 11. Chamaesyce lasiocarpa 86. 1 2 . Chamaesyce pare! f lora 88 , 13. Chamaesyce brittonii 90. 14. Chamaesyce cowe 1 1 i i 93. 15. Chamaesyce blodqettii 97. 16. Chamaesyce serpens 107. 17. Chamaesyce centunculoides 111. 18. Chamaesyce torralbasii 117. 19. Chamaesyce camaguayens i s 121. 20. Chamaesyce cord i fol ia ]2k. 21. Chamaesyce pol ygon i fo 1 ia 128. 22. Chamaesyce ammannioides I30. 23. Chamaesyce cumul icola 13^. 24. Chamaesyce prostrata I38. 25. Chamaesyce mendezi i 144, 26. Chamaesyce hepat ica 148. 27. Chamaesyce hel wig! i 150. 28. Chamaesyce h i rta 152. 29. Chamaesyce opthalmica I6O. 30. Chamaesyce berter iana I65. 3 1 . Chamaesyce maculata 1 68 . TABLE OF CONTENTS, Continued SYSTEMATIC TREATMENT, Continued Page Chamaesyce 32. Chamaesyce thymi folia 175. 33. Chamaesyce adenoptera I80. 34. Chamaesyce conferta 190. 35. Chamaesyce garberi 193. 36. Chamaesyce mul t i nodi s 203. 37. Chamaesyce minutula 205. 38. Chamaesyce turp i ni i 207. 39. Chamaesyce paredonensis 210. 40. Chamaesyce pinetorum 213. 41. Chamaesyce deltoidea 216. 42. Chamaesyce tumistyla 224. 43. Chamaesyce leonardii 226. DOUBTFUL SPECIES 229. PHYLOGENY 231. BIBLIOGRAPHY 239. APPENDIX 243. BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH 244. LIST OF MAPS Page Map 1. Distribution of _C. vagi nulata 32. Map 2. Distribution of _C. buxi fol ia 32. Map 3. Distribution of _C. lecheoides var, wi 1 soni i kS. Map 4. Distribution of _C. 1 echeoides var. lecheoides 49. Map 5. Distribution of _C. lecheoides var. exumens i s 50. Map 6. Distribution of _C. cayens i s 50. Map 7. Distribution of _C, porter iana var. keyens is 6l. Map 8. Distribution of _C. porter iana var. porter iana 61. Map 9. Distribution of C^. porter iana var. scopar ia 62. Map 10. Distribution of _C. art iculata and _C. myrt i I 1 i fol ia 62. Map 11. Distribution of _C. nutans 70. Map 12. Distribution of _C. hyper ici fol ia 70. Map 13. Distribution of _C. hyssop i fol ia 85. Map 14, Distribution of _C. las iocarpa 85. Map 15. Distribution of _C. parci flora 89. Map 16. Distribution of _C. bri ttoni i 89. Map 17. Distribution of C_. cowel 1 i i 96, Map 18. Distribution of _C. blodgetti i 96. Map 19. Distribution of _C. serpens 112. Map 20. Distribution of _C. centunculoides 112. Map 21. Distribution of _C. torral basi i 120. Map 22. Distribution of _C. camaguayens i s 120, LIST OF MAPS, Continued Page Map 23. Distribution of _C. cordifol ia 127, Map 24. Distribution of _C. polyqonifol ia 127. Map 25. Distribution of _C. ammannioides I35. Map 26. Distribution of _C. cumul icola 135, Map 27. Distribution of _C. prostrata 143. Map 28. Distribution of _C. mendezi i I43. Map 29. Distribution of _C, hi rta 159. Map 30. Distribution of C. opthalmica I59, Map 31. Distribution of _C. berteriana I67. Map 32, Distribution of _C. macuiata I67, Map 33. Distribution of _C. helwiqi i and _C. paredonensis 179. Map 34. Distribution of _C. thymifo] ia I79. Map 35. Distribution of _C. adenoptera ssp. adenoptera 188. Map 36. Distribution of _C. adenoptera ssp. pergamena 188. Map 37. Distribution of _C. adenoptera ssp. qundlachi i I89, Map 38. Distribution of _C. conferta ■ I89. Map 39. Distribution of _C. garber i 202. Map 40. Distribution of C. turpini i • 202. Map 4]. Distribution of _C. pinetorum 215. Map 42. Distribution of _C. del to idea ssp. serpyl 1 um 215. Map 43. Distribution of _C. del toidea ssp. del to idea var. del toidea 223, Map 44. Distribution of _C. del toidea ssp. del toidea var. adhaerens 223. LIST OF PLATES Plate 1. CHAMAESYCE VAGINULATA (Griseb.) Mi lisp. Plate 2. CHAMAESYCE ARTiCULATA (Aubl.) Britton Plate 3. CHAMAESYCE BUXIFOLIA (Lam.) Small Plated. C. LECHEOIDES (Millsp.) Millsp. var. WILSONli (Mi 1 1 sp.) i ned, Plate 5. CHAMAESYCE LECHEOIDES (Millsp.) Millsp. var. LECHEOIDES Plate 6. C. LECHEOIDZS (Millsp.) Millsp. var. EXUMENSIS (Mi 1 1 sp. ) ined. Plate 7. CHAMAESYCE CAYENSIS (Millsp.) Millsp. Plate 8. CHAMAESYCE PORTERIANA Small var. KEYENSIS (Small) i ned. Plate 9. CHAMAESYCE PORTERIANA Small var. PORTERIANA Plate Plate Plate Plate Plate Plate Plate Plate Plate Plate 0. CHAMAESYCE PORTERIANA Small var. SCOPARIA (Small) I ned. 1. CHAMAESYCE MYRTI LLI FOL I A (L.) Millsp. 2. CHAMAESYCE NUTANS (Lag.) Small 3. CHAMAESYCE HYPERI C I FOLI A (L.) Millsp. k. CHAMAESYCE HYSSOPIFOLIA (L.) Small 5. CHAMAESYCE HYSSOPIFOLIA (L.) Small 6. CHAMAESYCE HYSSOPIFOLIA (L.) Small 7. CHAMAESYCE BRITTONII (Millsp.) Millsp. 8. CHAMAESYCE COWELLII Millsp. in Britton 9. CHAMAESYCE BLODGETTII (Engelm. ex Hitchc.) Small Page 31. 35. 38. ^6. 47. 48. 53. 58. 59. 60. 64. 67. 73. 79. 80. 81. 92. 95. 99. LIST OF PLATES, Continued Page Plate 20. CHAMAESYCE BLODGETTI I (Engelm. ex Hitchc.) Small 100. Plate 21. CHAMAESYCE BLODGETTI! (Engelm, ex Hitchc.) Small 101. Plate 22. CHAMAESYCE SERPENS (HBK.) Small 109. Plate 23. CHAMAESYCE CENTUNCULO 1 DES (HBK.) Mi lisp. 115. Plate 2k. CHAMAESYCE CENTUNCULOI DES (HBK.) Mi lisp. 116. Plate 25. CHAMAESYCE TORRALBASII (Urb.) Mi lisp. 119. Plate 26. CHAMAESYCE CAMAGUAYENS I S Mi lisp. 123. Plate 27. CHAMAESYCE CORDIFOLIA (Ell.) Small 125. Plate 28. CHAMAESYCE POLYGON 1 FOLIA (L.) Small 129. Plate 29. CHAMAESYCE AMMANNIOIDES (HBK.) Small 132. Plate 30. CHAMAESYCE CUMULICOLA Small 137. Plate 31. CHAMAESYCE PROSTRATA (Ait.) Small l40. Plate 32. CHAMAESYCE MENDEZII (Boiss.) Mi lisp. 146. Plate 33. CHAMAESYCE HEPATICA (Urb. & Ekm.) ined. 1^9. Plate 34. CHAMAESYCE HELWIGII (Urb. & Ekm.) ined. 151. Plate 35. CHAMAESYCE H 1 RTA (L.) Mi lisp. 154. Plate 36. CHAMAESYCE OPTHALMICA (Pers.) ined. 162. Plate 37. CHAMAESYCE MACULATA (L.) Small 170. Plate 38. CHAMAESYCE MACULATA (L.) Small 171. Plate 39. CHAMAESYCE THYMIFOLIA (L.) Millsp. 177. Plate 40. C. ADENOPTERA (Bertol.) Small var. PERGAMENA (Small) ined. 185. Plate 41. C. ADENOPTERA (Bertol.) Small var. PERGAMENA (Small) ined. 186. LIST OF PLATES, Continued Page Plate 42. C. ADENOPTERA (Bertol.) Small var. GUNDLACHI I (Urban) Ined. 187. Plate 43. CHAMAESYCE CONFERTA Small 192. Plate kk. CHAMAESYCE GARBERI (Engelm. ex Chapm.) Small 196. Plate 45. CHAMAESYCE GARBERI (Engelm. ex Chapm.) Small 197. Plate 46. CHAMAESYCE GARBERI (Engelm. ex Chapm.) Small 198. Plate 47. CHAMAESYCE GARBERI (Engelm. ex Chapm.) Small 199. Plate 48. CHAMAESYCE MULTl NODI S (Urb.) Millsp. 204. Plate 49. CHAMAESYCE TURPINI I (Boiss.) Millsp. 209. Plate 50. CHAMAESYCE PAREDONENSIS Millsp. 212. Plate 51. CHAMAESYCE PINETORUM Small 214. Plate 52. CHAMAESYCE DELTOIDEA (Engelm. ex Chapm.) Small ssp, SERPYLLUM (Small) ined. 219. Plate 53. CHAMAESYCE DELTOIDEA (Engelm. ex Chapm.) Small ssp. DELTOIDEA var. DELTOIDEA 221. Plate 54. CHAMAESYCE DELTOIDEA (Engelm. ex Chapm.) Small ssp. DELTOIDEA var. ADHAERENS (Small) ined. 222. Plate 55. EVOLUTION OF BRANCHING PATTERN IN CHAMAESYCE 234. INTRODUCTION The genus Chamaesyce (Euphorb iaceae) is represented on all continents, and, while many species are widespread in temperate areas, the genus reaches Its greatest diversity in tropical and subtropical reg ions. In 1941 Wheeler revised the group in North America exclusive of Mexico and southern Florida, treating it as a subgenus of the Linnaean genus Euphorb ia. He found areas with high concentrations of species centered in Arizona and in Texas, and suggested that a similar concen- tration might exist in south Florida involving species with a Caribbean affinity. The most recent treatment of the genus in Florida by Small (1933) indicates the same thing, since eighteen species confined to Florida are included in the twenty-nine that he lists for the state. Many of these are from the pinelands around Miami or on the lower Keys, areas with very distinctive plant associations, but not generally rich in endemic species. The plants of south Florida are known to have strong floristic ties both with Cuba and the Yucatan peninsula, and with the Bahama Islands, and it was clear that the Florida species could not be dealt with effectively without considering those of the surrounding area. The Caribbean as a whole - here considered to include southern Florida as well as the Bahamas and the Greater and Lesser Antilles, but excluding Trinidad and the islands of the Dutch West Indies off the coast of Venezuela - does, however, make up a contained unit f lor i st i ca 1 1 y , and is a convenient area for study. It has the added advantage that no synthesis of the genus for this area has been attempted since Boissier's treatment of Euphorb ia sensu lato on a worldwide basis in 1862, although certain regions have been extensively collected since that time, and the genus revised in these localities. Regional floras with relevant material include The Bahama Flora by Britton and Millspaugh (1920), which draws on Millspaugh's strong interest in Chamaesyce, Fawcett and Rendle's Flora of Jamaica (1920), Scientific Survey of Porto Rico and the Virgin Islands by Britton and Wilson (1924), and Flora de Cuba by Alain (1953). There is also material relating to Hispaniola and to Cuba in Urban's Symbolae Antillanae (I898- 1928), and in the reports of Ekman's collecting trips in Haiti (Urban and Ekman, 1929). The consequence of this publication of works covering only small geographic areas has been the description of the same plant under different names from different parts of its range. It is fortunate that much of the type material for these names is still accessible, and it has proved possible in the course of the study to reduce many of them to synonymy. Material from twenty-two herbaria has been examined, and the large number of specimens available of many species has given valuable indications of the extent of morphological variation to be expected and taken into account when considering the validity of names about which there is doubt. Some 4500 sheets have been studied and additional material, as well as valuable type specimens, examined during visits to other insti- tutions. The herbaria from which material has been seen are listed below, together with the abbreviations (most from Lanjouw and Stafleu, 19^4), by which they will be referred to in the text. A " Arnold Arboretum, Cambridge, Massachusetts BM British Museum (Natural History), London BRASS Herbarium of Archbold Biological Station, Lake Placid, Florida BUS University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida DUKE Duke University, Durham, North Carolina E Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh, Great Britain F Chicago Natural History Museum, Chicago, Illinois FLAS University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida FSU Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida GH Gray Herbarium of Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts IJ Institute of Jamaica, Kingston, Jamaica K Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, Great Britain LINN Linnaean Society Herbarium, London MO Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, Missouri NCU University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina NSC North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina NY New York Botanical Garden, New York PUR Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana RUS Louisiana Technical College, Ruston, Louisiana UCWl University of the West Indies, St. Andrews, Jamaica US U. S. National Museum, Washington, D. C. USF University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida GENERAL DISCUSSION I , History Many taxonomists have treated Chamaesyce as no more than a subdivision of the large, diverse genus Euphorbia L. To a certain extent the choice of which of these generic names to use is an academic matter, but, insofar as the schemes of biological classifi- cation are intended to have a natural basis, the collection of species into a genus should reflect a close degree of common ancestry, and the thesis of workers who would split Euphorb ia into several genera is that such a division represents this close relationship better than would the maintenance of the broad genus. The genus Euphorbia was described by Linnaeus in Genera Plantarum ed. 5 (175^), and was delimited on the basis of its floral characters. Reference was made to the earlier names Euphorb ium proposed by D'lsnard in 1720 for much the same group, and to Ti thymal us and Ti thymaloides , both of which were used by Tournefort (1700), one of the first botanists to make such formal definitions of groups rather than simply listing species. The "sexual system" of classification followed by Linnaeus divided plants into Classes according to the number of stamens present in the flower, with these Classes then divided into Orders, usually formed by reference to the number of styles. The genus Euphorb ia was placed in the third Order of the eleventh Class, DODECANDRIA TRIGYNIA, k. 5. since Linnaeus had found that twelve or more stamens were usually present, and that there were three styles. The description in Genera PI antarum stresses the characteristic calyx of the genus, with its segments joined to form a four-or five-toothed cup and petals set on the margin alter- nating with the teeth, and also the tricoccate capsule with a single seed in each locule. Some of the variety to be found in the shape of the petals and in the form of the stem is also mentioned. Linnaeus was familiar with some fifty-six species at this time, and his descriptions in Species Plantarum (1753) indicate that he felt the characteristic flower to be a strong enough factor to hold together in one genus such diverse morphological forms as the cactus- 1 i ke _E. mamm i 1 lar is , the small, prostrate E. maculata , and the erect _E. lathyrus with its umbellate branches and crescent-shaped petals. The genus, characterized by the flower type, was accepted by most authors of the period, although Wheeler (19^3) points out that as early as 1754 Miller had proposed that part of the genus, homogeneous for cer- tain morphological characters, be split off under another name. In 1818 Robert Brown, an Edinburgh surgeon and keen botanist, published the results of anatomical work which showed that the flower which Linnaeus described was, in fact, an inflorescence. The tricoccate ovary was actually a terminal female flower with the perianth parts re- duced to a vestigial calyx, and below this in the inflorescence were groups of male flowers, each reduced to a single stamen. The cup-like calyx which Linnaeus described was an involucre of fused bracts, while the petals were glands and associated appendages set on the upper rim of the involucre. The name cyathium was given to this type of inflorescence. This work of Brown weakened the case for maintaining the diverse forms under one genus because It is inconsistent with usage In the rest of the plant kingdom, and because Linnaeus would presumably not have defined a genus on this basis of a shared inflorescence type. The parallel has been drawn with the situation in the Compositae, which are defined as a family by the capitate inflorescence and by reduction in some flower parts, and which would form a genus of some 20,000 species if these were considered generic rather than family characters. This obviously represents neither a realistic appraisal of the close degree of common ancestry which is usually sought for a genus, nor an efficient means of data retrieval which Is one of the tacit aims in setting up such a system of classification. In spite of this - or perhaps because Brown's results were not universally accepted at first (Haber, 1925) - many of the diverse species described in the hundred years after the publication of Species Plantarum v/ere named using Euphorb ia in its broad sense, and the stamp of approval was given to the practice by Boissier In a series of publications cul- minating in his monumental treatment of the family with J, Muller in de Candolle's Prodromus (1862). The characters of the inflorescence were still used to define the genus, but by this time the number of species known had swollen to the point at which Internal subdivision of the genus was standard practice. Persoon (1806), Rafinesque (1817), and Reichen- bach (1841) had all set up subgenera, while Haworth (1827) and Roeper (1828) had divided the genus Into sections, Boissier himself used sec- tions and subsections, but was apparently dissatisfied with the bases for his division, since he comments In his notes on the genus (1862) "The characters of the sections are often trifling and open to exception but better ones cannot be found" (translation by Croizat, 1936a), We may assume from this that Boissier maintained the genus Euphorb ia in its widest sense not only because of the common inflorescence type, but also because he could find no consistent characters on which to divide it. Many more species have been added to the genus since the time of Boissier, until today Scholz (1964) estimates that it includes some 1 dOO ent i t ies. The retention of the genus in Its broad sense has been opposed on a number of grounds, and attempts have been made from time to time to justify the segregation of certain groups, Croizat (1936a) has pointed out that the possession of a cyathlum is not restricted to this genus, but occurs in several others recognized by even the most con- servative taxonomlsts. Among these Pax (who had written the account of the family for Engler and Prantl's Pf lanzenfami 1 ien In I89O) is quoted as saying In 1924 that the cyathlum was the main character of the Tribe Euphorbieae rather than the genus Euphorbia. Croizat also suggests that the species in Euphorbia are more variable In their degree of evolution than would be expected In a single genus, and that the cyathlum is not an anatomic constant, and concludes that the use of the single character of the presence of a broadly similar inflorescence, cutting across other indications of relationship as It does, is unsound from a taxonomic point of view. Evidence from new areas of taxonomic research confirms the lack of homogeneity in the genus. Perry (19^3) reports that a survey of 8. somatic chromosomes in the Euphorb iaceae showed a considerable degree of uniformity in size, shape, and basic number within all genera except Euphorb ia , which seemed to include three distinct groups. Studies on the electrophoresis of latex by Moyer (193^) gave groupings within the genus corresponding roughly to the sections of Boissier, The work on pollen morphology by Erdtman (1952) and Punt (1962), however, gave no clear divisions, although some of the patterns of exine surface showed differences through the genus. A difficulty with interpreting these studies lies in the fact that no voucher speci- mens are available, so that any conclusions drawn must be tempered by the uncertainty as to the exact taxonomic entities represented by the names used. Haber (1925), while not favoring a division of the genus, found that the sections described by Pax in Engler and Prantl's Pf lanzen- fami 1 ien (I89O) showed little affinity in terms of anatomy and morphology of the cyathium. For these reasons, together with the diversity of habit and form in the group, it is hard to accept that Euphorbia fulfills the condition of relatively close ancestry which is usually imposed when judging the soundness of a genus. It is unfortunate that no comprehensive evaluation has been made since Boissier's work more than a century ago, since many of the proposals for segregating groups which have seemed inconsistent with usage in the rest of the unchanged genus, might well have been perfectly acceptable in the light of an overall revision. One such segregation to which this criticism of inconsistency might apply is the separation of Chamaesyce as a genus without considering the equally valid genera Ti thymal us , Aqaloma and Po i n s e 1 1 i a . It is beyond the scope of the present wori< to examine all these genera, but Chamaesyce is such a discrete group in the area under consideration, and so easily distinguishable from other members of Euphorbia sensu lato, that i t wi 1 1 be accepted here as a distinct genus. A case will be presented for this division below, but final judgment of its validity must wait until a revision of the complete Tribe Euphorb ieae of the Family Euphorb iaceae has been under- taken. I I . The Segregation of the Genus Chamaesyce Chamaesyce was first proposed as a segregate genus by S. F. Gray in 1821 with a single species which would appear automatically to become the type species. Wheeler (19^3), however, supports Millspaugh (1909) in designating Euphorb ia pep 1 i s L. as type since Gray was clearly describ- ing this species under his name C. mar i t ima and, in fact, gave _E. pepl is in synonymy, thus making the later name illegitimate. The type specimen of _E. pepl i s L. in the Linnaean Herbarium becomes the type of _C. mar i t ima S. F. Gray and of the genus Chamaesyce S, F, Gray, Wheeler (19^3) points out that the name had been validly pub- lished as a subgenus, and suggested provisionally as a genus, by Rafinesque in 1817, but such provisional publication is not acceptable. Gray was justified in selecting this generic name even though Anisophyl 1 um had been proposed for the same group at this taxonomic level by Haworth in 1812, since that name was preoccupied by Jacquin's use of it in another sense in I763. Gray took the name Chamaesyce from Dioscorides, a Greek herbalist of the first century A.D., who compiled lists of plant names and uses from medical works and from herb-gatherers and peasants (Gunther, 1959)- The word is a transliteration of two Greek components, chamae, of the ground or lov;-growi ng , and Syce which was one of the names used for the fig, and the association is probably due to the presence in members of the genus Euphorbia of a milky latex similar to that found in fig trees. The name was listed as a synonym for the genus Euphorb ia by Wiman (1752) 10. with a similar comment that it was a type of low-growing fig (quas i humi 1 i s f i cus) , Gray's name was not widely adopted for a number of years after publication, but the cohesion of the species which belong in the genus is indicated by their treatment by subsequent authors. Roeper pub- lished the group as Euphorbia sect ion Anisophyl 1 um in 1828, whi le Rafinesque changed his mind after his publication of the subgenus Chamaesyce in 1817 to treat them as a set of related genera in I838. They were put bacl< into a single category as Euphorb ia subgenus Ani sophyl 1 um Caesalp, ex Reichenbach in l84l , treated as the genus An isophyl 1 um by Klotzsch and Garcke (1859), and finally the definitive work by Boissier in 1862 followed Roeper by using section Ani sophyl 1 um for the group, Croizat (1936a, 1936b, 1937) has examined these species which have been combined so consistently by authorities on the family. They share a number of morphological characters, which have been used by the various authors in an attempt to delimit the group at the particular taxonomic level which they favored. Boissier (1862), for example, used leaf arrangement and shape, stipule shape, inflorescence type, number and form of glands and the ecarunculate nature of the seed in his com- parisons with the other twenty-six sections which he recognized, while Wheeler (19^1), considering only New World species, separated four sub- genera on the basis of number and form of glands and their appendages, and on leaf arrangement and stipule development, Boissier's dissatis- faction with his separation has already been mentioned, and Wheeler is equally pessimistic about his success in defining his divisions. There 12. is general agreement In the literature, however, about the characters shared by this group of species. They all have opposite, petiolate leaves with oblique bases and i nterpet iol ar stipules. All have an interesting distribution of chlorophyll-bearing tissue in the leaves, where it surrounds the veinlets leaving clear areas between them, and all have cyathia with four glands whose appendages, if present, are petalloid, never lunate. The fifth gland is either obsolete or much reduced and set in a sinus through which the capsule stalk often droops at maturity, and, finally, the seeds are ecarunculate. None of these characters is restricted to this group of species, but Croizat (1936a, 1936b) has demonstrated that a particular type of branching, in which the main axis aborts early and is replaced by one or more secondary axes. Is peculiar to the group, and serves as a diagnostic feature. Here, then, is a discrete character of a fundamental nature - the presence or absence of a type of branching - which gives an absolute separation of a group of species from the heterogeneous Euphorbia sensu lato. What is more, the species showing this type of branching share many other morphological features, and have been accepted as a cohesive group by most authorities on the family. On these grounds their segregation as the distinct genus Chamaesyce appears well justified. This separation has been adopted in the present work, and Is particularly appropriate In the New World where the species of Chamaesyce are easily distinguishable from other members of the family on even a casual examination. The usage is by no means novel in this area in that, of the floras mentioned in the Introduction, only those by Urban and by Favycett and Rendle maintain Euphorb I a sensu lato. The split has not been 13. js widely adopted in other regions, however, and an assessment of its value on a worldwide basis must await a more comprehensive study. III. Morphology The largest members of the genus Chamaesyce are found in the Hawaiian Islands where some species have become arborescent. In the Caribbean no such development is found, although one species, _C. vaq i nulata (Griseb,) Millsp,, has strong affinities with species of the Galapagos Islands, and exhibits some of the peculiarities of structure otherwise found only in endemics of that group. The remarks in the following sections are intended to be limited to species grow- ing under natural conditions in the Caribbean, which include annual and perennial herbs of prostrate, ascending or erect habit, and shrubs and subshrubs of open form reaching a height of one to six meters. Roots The root system is not extensive, and the laterals are slender and branching. The main root in annual species is substantial and little branched, and may become quite thick in plants living beyond their normal season. Some of the perennials develop a short, thick taproot, which develops buds at or below the surface of the ground throughout the life of the plant, and often regardless of whether the above-ground portions have died back or maintained their growth. Stems The main axis is interrupted by the abortion of the growing point after the production of one pair of true leaves. Lateral branches (secondary axes) develop from a point below the apex with no apparent relation to the position of the pair of leaves (Croizat, 1936b). If 14.- 15. only one secondary axis develops its thickening may obscure and eventually conceal its origin, but In species In which a number of branches grow (particularly those in which they lie prostrate) this apex is well marked. On these secondary axes laterals (tertiary axes) may develop, either throughout the length, or only near the lower or upper end, A common form is the production of short, rather congested laterals from the upper nodes on which most of the cyathia develop. Branching appears to be alternate, with occasional production of other weaker branches at the node, often becoming dichotomous near the apex, and may be at an obtuse or acute angle with the stem. In the herbaceous species, stems are wiry and brittle, or wider and of softer texture, often becoming woody at the base. Rooting at the nodes is common in some species. Prostrate species form tight or loose mats to 5 dm, diameter, the erect herbaceous species may reach 6-8 dm, Crolzat (1936b) describes the growth of the secondary axes as sympodlal with each node terminated by a bud, a cyathium or a capitulum, and the tertiary axes developed lateral to these. This Is In agreement with Roeper (1824) who explains the apparently normal lateral branching as actually a reduction from the potential dichotomy which is expressed at times at the tips of branches (Wheeler, 19^1) , The strongly alternate branching which many species exhibit merely requires that the reduction of the branches of the dichotomy alternates at the nodes. The same pattern of branching may develop on tertiary axes, and rarely on those of higher orders. In the systematic part of this study the word "stem" will be used to Indicate the secondary axes, and "laterals" or "side branches" will 16. be used for tertiary and higher order axes. The aborted apex of the stem, from which the secondary axes develop, will be called the crown of the root for convenience in making comparisons with descriptions by other authors. Leaves Leaves are opposite on the stem, and more or less two-ranked. The blades are simple, membranous or sometimes coriaceous or sometimes somewhat fleshy, and broad or rarely almost linear, 1x1 to 35 x 15 mm. The base is inequilateral, usually markedly so, the margin entire or variously toothed and plane or somewhat revolute, and the apex round to acute or sometimes minutely apiculate. The veins are rarely promi- nent, but in thin leaves the concentration of chlorophyll-bearing cells around the conducting tissue with clear spaces between marks out the reticulation of the veinlets. Petioles are short, and the i nterpet iolar stipules may be separate, or those on either side of the stem may be joined to the corresponding one from the paired leaf. Their texture is usually mem- branous, and the margins may be entire or variously toothed or parted. In some species the pairs of leaflets droop at night in well-marked nastic movement, Cyathia These are solitary and terminal, but often appear axillary when the growth of a lateral continues the axis. They are often borne on congested leafy laterals or in short-stalked lateral and terminal dichasia, and sometimes, by reduction, in leafless dichasial glomerules. Each cyathium is itself a compound inflorescence, but strongly 17. simulates a single flower, A single terminal female flower with, at most, a vestigial calyx to represent the perianth, is surrounded by groups of male flowers, each flower reduced to a single stamen and interspersed by bracteoles. These are enclosed in a cup-like involucre made up of five fol iaceous structures, united at their margins but with free tips. Between these, glands are borne on the rim of the cup, supplied by a trace from each of the adjacent foliar structures (Haber, 1925) and often with a petal loid appendage, which may be as long as, and up to four times as wide as, the subcircular or transversely ellip- tic gland. The fifth gland is obsolete or reduced to a linear structure, and the space between the two lobes which it would occupy becomes a sinus into which the stalk of the capsule often droops at maturity. The cyathia are short- peduncled or rarely sessile. The term lobe is used here and in the systematic section to indicate the free portion of the foliar structures which are fused to make up the involucre. The glands appear moist under magnification, and may produce a substance attractive to insects, A large number of ants are often found on and around the plants, and may be the agent for cross-pollination, Male Flower An articulation between the pedicel and stamen indicates that these monandrous structures are each a reduced flower rather than simply floral parts. Each is subtended by a bracteole which may grow up between the flowers. The staminate flowers form in five fascicles, arranged opposite the lobes of the involucre, and In each fascicle the flowers develop cent r I fugal 1 y with respect to the cyathium axis. In our species five, or rarely fewer, to about thirty is the usual number of staminate 18. flowers to each cyathium. The number is relatively constant in a given species. The stamens are exserted at maturity, carried on elongated glabrous pedicels (Wheeler's term "androphore" is adopted for this pedicel in the systematic section). Dehiscence of the anthers is transverse, and the serial maturation of the flowers spans the time during which the female flower is developing. Female Flowers The single terminal flower is pedicillate (Wheeler's term "gynophore" will be used for this pedicel), with the perianth reduced to a vestigial three-lobed calyx or a mere disc below the ovary. The pistil has three united carpels, each with a single pendulous, anatropous ovule. The three styles are joined at the base or rarely free or connate for a greater distance, and are bifid for part of their length. The gynophore is glabrous or variously pubescent, and in most cases elongates with age and bends to lie in the sinus that marks the position of the fifth gland. Frui t This is a trilocular capsule with one seed in each chamber, usually roundly looed or triangular but sometimes subspher i cal , Dehiscence is by longitudinal splitting at the sutures, and to a smaller extent at the angles. The base of the capsule is released first, and the seed may be thrown a short distance from the flower by the parting of the capsule wall. Seed The caruncle, which is so well developed in other species of Euphorb ia sensu lato, is completely absent in Chamaesyce. The embryo 19. and endosperm are surrounded by a membrane and the testa, which may in turn be covered by a persistent cellulose layer. This layer and the testa may be patterned or sculpted. The shape of the seed follows that of the trilocular capsule in which it develops. In the systematic section the faces to the outside of the capsule will be referred to as the dorsal faces, subtending the dorsal angle, and the other two as the ventral faces subtending the ventral angle. The seed is irregularly ovoid in longitudinal section with the ventral side flattened. In cross section it is four-angled, often obscurely so, but with the dorsal angle usually more acute and pronounced than the ventral, and the lateral angles intermediate between the two. Vesture The stems, leaves, cyathia, ovary and capsules may be glabrous or variously long- or short-hairy. The hairs are all simple, and may be single-or several-celled. in some species the surface of the leaves and young stems may be entirely minutely white-papillose, appearing almost granular under magnification. Latex All species have a milky latex to which various caustic properties have been ascribed. / Morphological characters have proved to be very plastic within many of the species examined. The habit of the herbaceous species often varies widely, with occasional erect specimens in species which are usually prostrate to decumbent, and with sprawling plants from species which are normally completely upright to ascending. The number of stems 20. growing from the root is a more constant feature, with prostrate plants more likely to have multiple stems than erect species, but the number often changes with the change in habit in the case of erect specimens of prostrate species. The pubescence of the plant is usually reliable as a character when contrasted with the absence of hairs (there are exceptions to this among the south Florida species), but the degree of pubescence and even the form of the hairs present is likely to vary over a wide range within a species. Leaf shape is variable, as might be expected, but in most cases there is also a strong likelihood of toothed margins on occasional leaves (or whole plants) of species which normally have entire leaves, Cyathial characters in general show less plasticity, but the size and form of appendages Is rarely reliable, and vestlture may differ vyidely from plant to plant or branch to branch. The same Is true of capsular characters, but the seed has proved to be stable enough that characters relating to its morphology are often sufficient to key plants out, and certainly to confirm doubtful identifications. SYSTEMATIC TREATMENT CHAMAESYCE S. F. Gray, Nat. Arr. Brit. PI., 2: 260. 1821. Type: Chamaesyce maritima S. F, Gray. This is a superfluous name for Euphorb i a pep 1 i s L. , and the type specimen of this species in the Linnaean Herbarium (sheet 63O-I8) is thus the type for _C. mar i t ima and for the genus. Euphorb ia subgenus Chamaesyce (S. F. Gray) House, Bull. N. Y. State Mus. 25^: 470. 1924, Anisophyl 1 urn Haworth, Syn. PI. Succ. , I59, I8l2. Type: Anisophyllum pepHs (L.) Haw., designated by Wheeler, Rhodora 4-3: 110. 1941. Euphorb ia section Ani sophyl lum (Haw.) Pax in Engler £■ Prantl, Nat. Pflanzenfam., 3(5): 104. I89I. Euphorb ia subgenus Chamaesyce Raf . , Amer. Monthly Mag. 2: 1 I9. 1817. Type: Euphorbia supina Raf. Euphorbia section Ani sophyl 1 um Roeper in Duby, A. P. de Candolle, Bot. Gall, ed 2, 1: 412. I828. Type: Euphorbia pep! is L. , designated by Wheeler, Rhodora 43: 111. 1941. Euphorb ia subgenus Chamaesyce Caesalp, ex Reichenbach, Fl. Germ. Excurs. , 755. 1832. Type: Euphorbia chamaesyce L. , designated by Wheeler, Rhodora 43: 111. 1941. Ditritra Raf., Fl, Tell., 4: 114. I838. Type: Ditritra hirta Raf., designated by Wheeler, Am. Mid. Nat. 30: 465. 1943. Endoisila Raf., Fl. Tell., 4: 114. I838. Type: Endoisila myrs ini tes Raf. 21. 22, Aplarina Raf., New Fl. N. Amer., 99. I838. Type: Aplarina prostrata Raf., designated by V/heeler, Rhodora ^3: 111. 1941. Annual or perennial herbs, often suf f rutescent , or shrubs; prostrate to ascending or erect; glabrous or variously pubescent; milky latex in all parts. Main axis aborting, secondary axes few to many, wiry or thicker, sometimes rooting at nodes. Leaves opposite, petiolate with i nter-petiol ar stipules; blades expanded, bases inequilateral. Cyathia terminal but appearing axillary, solitary at nodes or clustered in cymules; lobes five, approximating glands; glands four or with fifth vestigial, alternating with lobes, with or without petalloid appendages. Staminate flovyers monandrous, naked, few to many, maturing serially, - exserted when mature, anther dehiscence transverse. Pistillate flower solitary, terminal; perianth reduced to pad of tissue or vestigial calyx; overy three-celled, each v/ith a single ovule; styles three, free or joined at base, usually bifid for part of length. Capsule dehiscent at sutures. Seed ecarunculate, coat smooth or variously sculptured. Plants of disturbed habitats, probably poor competitors in many cases. Many species favor sandy soils, either coastal or inland and often unstable, while others are restricted to pinelands whose characteristic flora is maintained by periodic burning. The most common species, _C. maculata in Florida and _C. hyssopi fol ia in the New World tropics as a v/hole, follow man, and are frequent as weeds in paved areas and cultivated or abandoned ground. Many species have a wide geographic range, passing unfavorable periods of the year as seed or with growth almost quiescent and quickly resumed when conditions improve. Seed pro- duction is abundant in most species. 23. The use of the taxonomic categories "species", subspecies", and "variety" in this work follows conventional lines (see, for example, Davis and Heywood, I963). They are considered to constitute an hier- archy, and the increasing degree of morphological homogeneity as the rank of the group decreases is taken to imply a greater freedom of gene interchange within the group. The use of these three ranks is a compromise between the naming as a distinct taxon of any population which is prevented by any means from exchanging genes with other popu- lations, whether or not morphological differences have become established, and the more classical approach of applying names only to taxa which are discrete by a set number of morphological characteristics. Key to the Species of Chamaesyce in the Caribbean 1. Much-branched shrub, low-growing or 2-6 m. tall 2, 1. Annual or perennial herbs, often woody at the base and suf f rutescent, but rarely reaching 1 m. 3. 2. Leaves fleshy, subglobose or linear; closely branched with stems often almost prostrate 1. C^. vaginulata. 2. Leaves membranous, ovate to ligulate; branching divaricate, stems upright 2. C_, articulata. 3. Capsule glabrous ^« 3. Capsule pubescent 24. k. Plants erect or ascending 5. k. Plants prostrate to decumbent 12. 5. Leaf margins manifestly toothed, or, if entire, leaves ligulate "• 5. Leaf margins entire or obscurely toothed below apex, leaves never ligulate 10. Ih. 6. Stems several to many from the crown of a heavy root- ..^... stock, wiry, rarely more than 1 mm. diameter 13. £. brittoni i. 6. Stems few to several, thick, sometimes ^ reaching 4 mm. diameter 7. Cyathia few, borne singly or rarely in groups of two ^_ ..,^^3 or three; plant perennial ^^' ^' £ • 7 Cyathia many, grouped on short leafy laterals or in glomerules; annual but sometimes perennating 8. Capsule less than l.^f mm. long; cyathia usually in . ^ . -.^U, peduncled leafless glom,erules 9. C. hvper . ci fol . a. 8. Capsule more than 1.6 mm. long; cyathia on ^^ leafy laterals 9 Tips of shoots pubescent, at least in lines on * the side of the stem; leaves pilose beneath; seed ^ ^ nutans, with a rippled surface -* * 9 Tips glabrous; leaves glabrous or sparsely pilose beneath; seed with 1-k lateral ridges ^^^ ^^ hvssopi fol ia. on each face — ,0. (5) Leaves and young ste.s fleshy; stipules conspicuous membranous, ca. 1 mm. long, white ->• _• 10 (5) Leaves membranous or somewhat coriaceous, young stems not fleshy; stipules not conspicuous unless because of ciliate inner surface, coriaceous, ..11. ca. 0.5 mm. long, brown 11 Stipules densely white ciliate on surface nearest stem; leaf and young stem surface minutely white-pap. Hose; .^.^^^ glands dark, appendages obsolete '+• ii* • 11 Stipules not ciliate; stem surface smooth, somewhat waxy, leaf surface with raised markings but not papillose; glands green or red, appendages small or to twice ^ ^ porteriana. width of gland -* 12. (4) Stems wiry and stiff, rarely exceeding 0.5 mm. diameter, usually many from root stock 12 {k) Stems flexible rather than wiry, few to several from rootstock, either reaching 2-3 mm. diameter or ^ ^^^ ^^^ minute, threadlike 14. 13. Leaf margins enti re 25. 13. Leaf margins serrate, at least In basal leaves 15. 14. Leaves deltoid, margin somewhat revolute; glands fleshy, appendages obsolete or minute k] , _C. del toidea ssp, del toidea var. del toidea 14. Leaves orbicular to elliptic, plane; glands cupped, appendages prominent, to three times as wide as gland 19. £. camaquayensis. 15. All leaves serrate, most 4-8 mm. long; plants usually decumbent 18. C_, torralbas I I . 15. Only basal leaves serrate, most 2-3 mm. (rarely to 5 mm.) long; plants usually forming a lax, prostrate mat 17. C^. centunculoldes. 16. (12) Leaves and stems pubescent 39. £. paredonens i s. 16. (12) Leaves and stems glabrous 17. 17. Stems minute, threadlike, tomentose on upper surface; cyathia subsessile; styles undivided at apex; capsule less than 0.7 mm. long 42. _C. tumistyla. 17. Stems often reaching 2-3 mm. diameter, glabrous; cyathia with an obvious peduncle, styles bifid for part of length; capsule more than 1 mm. long 18. 18. Stipules not united, or minutely so at base, deeply parted or laclniate 19. 18. Stipules joined, at least on upper or lower surface of tips of branches, fringed or entire, never laclniate 22. 19. Seeds strongly angled; appendages conspicuous; leaves ovate to ovate-oblong, almost as wide as long 20. _C. cordi fol ia. 19. Seeds terete to obscurely angled; appendages incon- spicuous or absent; leaves narrowly elliptic to oblong, much longer than wide 20. 20. Capsule more than 2.5 mm. long; seed cuneiform, more than 2 mm. long 21. C. polygonlfol la. 20. Capsule less than 2.5 mm. long; seed ovoid, less than 2 mm. long 21 . 21. Seed 1.4-1.9 mm. long; leaves usually fleshy, size often widely different on main stem and laterals 22. C. ammannioides. 26. 21. Seed 1-1.4 mm. long; leaves not fleshy, all similar in size 23. C_. cumul icola. 22. (18) Stipules toothed at apex, white, prominent although only ca. 0,5 mm. long; faces of seed smooth; glands brown or deep purple, appendages white 16. _C. serpens. 22. (18) Stipules toothed or bifid almost to base, green or tan colored, not conspicuous although often more than 1 mm. long; faces of seed obscurely transversely ridged; glands greenish, appendages white, yellor or pink 23. 23. Stipules short, to 0.4 mm.; texture of all parts of plant subcor iaceous; leaf and stem surface somewhat papillose 14. _C. cowe 1 1 i i . 23. Stipules long, often more than 1 mm.; leaf texture only rarely firmer than membranous; leaf and stem surface smooth 15. £. blodqett i i . 24. (3) Leaf margins manifestly serrate 25. 24. (3) Leaf margins entire or obscurely toothed 36. 25. Plants erect with one or few thick stems 11. _C. las iocarpa. 25. Plants prostrate to decumbent with several to many stems which rarely exceed 2 mm. diameter 26. 26, Cyathia solitary at leafy nodes, appearing clustered if on congested laterals, but not in glomerules 27. 26. Cyathia in peduncled glomerules 34. 27. Appendages of glands subequal in size, often much reduced, or if two appendages much longer than other two, capsule not fully exserted, splitting one side of cyathium at maturity, glands subcircular or some- what transversely elongated ..... 28. 27. Appendages of glands greatly unequal in size, one pair longer than the other pair; capsule fully exserted and nutant at maturity, often concealed by long appendages; glands enlarged in length, to extend much of the distance around rim of cyathium 33. 28. Capsule pubescent only along the angles 29. 28. Capsule pubescent all over 30. 27. 29. Stem short-pubescent in lines at sides and sometimes on upper surface; faces of seed with deep, transverse furrows ..... 2k. C_. prostrata. 29. Stem long-hirsute, at least in lines at sides; surface of seed rippled 25. C_. mendez i i . 30. Capsule not completely exserted, splitting one side of cyathium at maturity ..... 32. _C. thymi fol ia. 30. Capsule completely exserted at maturity 31. 31. Leaf margin and coarsely serrate, often incised 1/2-1/3 distance to midrib; stems wiry, scarcely reaching 1 mm. diameter, many from heavy root stock 26. _C. hepat ica. 31. Leaf margin serrate but not deeply incised; stems not wiry, usually 1 mm. or more in diameter, few to several from annual or perennating root stock 32. 32. Stem deliquescent through dichotomous branching in upper part; leaf texture heavy; seeds with two broad faces and one angle acute, almost triangular in cross-section ..... 27. C. helwigi i . 32. Stem excurrent, forming only congested leafy laterals in upper part; leaf texture membranous; seeds with all faces subequal, angles obtuse, almost square in cross-section 31. C_. maculata. 33. (27) Stems long-pilose on upper surface; leaf apex acute; cyathia congested on short laterals 3^. C^. conferta. 33. (27) Stems short- tomentose or strigose on upper surface; leaf apex obtuse or rounded; cyathia borne singly or in small groups at upper nodes, if on laterals not congested 33. £. adenoptera. 34. (26) Leaf margins crenate-dentate or roundly serrate, apex obtuse 30. C. berteriana. 3k. (26) Leaf margins sharply serrate, apex acute 35. 35. Cymules terminal and lateral on leafless peduncles; stem branching at base but only infrequently near tips (when plant may appear to have cymules on laterals with a pair of subtending leaves); mostly robust, ascending, large-leaved plants 28. _C. hi rta. 35. Cymules terminal and on leafy laterals; stem branching freely; mostly low, small-leaved plants 29. C,. opthalmica. 28. 36. (24) Plants suf f rutescent; branches to 5 dm. long 37. 36. (24) Plants herbaceous, or, if woody at the base, of small stature, branches rarely exceeding 1 dm, long 39. 37. Appendages obsolete; glands deep purple 5. C_. cayens i s. 37. Appendages prominent; glands yellow or green ..... 38, 38. Open shrubs, branched from base; capsules more than 2 mm. long 7. C^. myrt i 1 1 i fol ia. 38, Suf f rutescent, base mostly unbranched; capsules 1.3~1.5 Tim. long 6. _C, porteriana var. keyens i s. 39. (3o) Stems pubescent on only one surface kO. 39. (36) Stems pubescent on all surfaces k\ , kO, Stems tufted, upright, usually less than 0.5 mm. diameter; leaf surface glabrous 37. £_. mi nutula. kO. Stems prostrate, usually ca. 1 mm, diameter; scattered white hairs on surface of leaf 36, _C. mul t i nod i s, k] . Cyathia in groups of 2-5 at nodes 43. _C. leonardi i . 41. Cyathia solitary at nodes 42. 42. Plants robust, stems 1-3 mm. diameter, to 3 dm. long, leaves 4-9 mm. long 35. C^. garber i . 42, Plants delicate, stems wiry, scarcely reaching 1 mm. diameter even in old plants, to 2 dm. long, leaves 2-5 mm. long 43, 43, Plants closely appressed forming a dense mat, sometimes becoming diffuse with age 41. C, deltoidea. 43. Plants decumbent at tips or erect 44, 44, Stems almost unbranched, vi 1 lous-h i rsute, tips canescent; capsule reniform, sharply three-lobed, angles acute 40. _C, p i netorum. 44, Stems branched freely, particularly in upper part of stem, sparsely or densely short-pilose, tips only occasionally canescent; capsule ovoid, roundly lobed, angles obtuse 38. _C. turpini i. 29. 1. CHAMAESYCE VAGINULATA (Griseb.) Mi lisp., Field Mus. Bot. 2: 302. 1909. Euphorbia vaqinulata Griseb., Fl. Brit. W. 1. Islands, 52. 1859- Type: Turk Islands, Hjalm. (Lectotype: K 1, fragment NY !). Designation of the lectotype is made here. The specimen at Kew was chosen because there is a strong probability that it was examined by Grisebach. Many of Hjalmarsson ' s collections were deposited at Systema- t i sch-Geobotan i sches Institute, Goettingen, and an isotype may exist there. The photograph of a Hjalm. sheet from Kew at IJ can have no standing as type material since it is not of this species but of C_. ? lecheoides (Millsp.) Millsp, Shrub; prostrate or ascending to 2 m. Stem to 1.5 cm. diameter, internodes to 3 cm. or congested; branching from base and throughout length, laterals often lying in one plane, not rooting at nodes, glabrous, becoming dark brown with age. Leaves fleshy; blades subglobular or linear-elliptic, 1.5 mm. diameter or 5 x 1-1.5 mm., base subequal, sub- cordate or rounded, margin entire, apex rounded, subart iculate from petiole, glabrous, yellow-green to purple-brown; petiole 0.3-1 mm, long; stipules sheathing stem and persistent, short, ciliate, white. Cyathia solitary at nodes, often on vestigial branches; peduncle short, somewhat expanded into obconical involucre, to 1 mm. diameter at mouth, lobes fleshy, equalling glands, triangular, glabrous on outside, ciliate within, glands transversely elliptic, 0.5 x 0.3 mm., fleshy, deep purple, append- ages absent, fifth gland triangular, large, equalling lobes or rarely of same form as other glands, sinus shallow. Staminate flowers 3-5 per cyathium or absent, androphores glabrous, scarcely exserted. Gynophore glabrous, to 1.5 mm. long at maturity, exserted, usually upright; 30. calyx a triangular pad of tissue; ovary glabrous; styles spreading, o.k mm. long, joined at base, bifid for 1/2 length. Capsule glabrous, globose, 1.5 mm. long, 1,8-2 mm. at equator, roundly three-lobed, angles rounded. Seed ovoid, 1.5 x 1.2 mm., scarcely angled, usually whi te. Restricted to a few islands of the southern Bahamas, but locally frequent on these in rocky and sandy areas behind the shore (Map 1). Representative specimens seen: BAHAMAS. Inagua, 6 Mar. 1962, Dunbar 107 (GH) ; Turtle Cove, Inagua, 19 Oct. 1904, Nash & Taylor 1170, (l^Y); Caicos Islands: North Caicos, 24 Apr. 1954, Lewis s.n. (GH, IJ); Bambarra, Middle Caicos, 2 July 1954, Proctor 9096 (IJ); South Caicos, 14-16 Dec. 1907, Wilson 768I (GH, NY). Turks Islands: Waterloo, Grand Turk, 20 Feb. -24 Mar. I9II, Millspaugh & Millspaugh 9055 (GH, NY); Grand Turk, 27 Aug.-] Sept. 1905, Nash £■ Taylor 3764 (NY); Long Cay, 12 June 1954, Proctor 8793 (GH, IJ). Watling's Island: Southeast End, 27, 28 Nov. 1907, Wilson 7259 (NY). Castle Island, 22 Dec. 1907, Wilson 7790 (NY). The fleshy leaves and involucres, and the shrubby habit with the closely branched stems often held almost prostrate, make this quite different from any other species in the area, Boissier (1862) grouped it with endemics of the Galapagos Islands on the basis of its appearance, fleshiness, and the persistent, ciliate stipules that ring the stem, but this morphological similarity is probably fortuitous and not an indi- cation of close common ancestry. Many species of other families grow in 31 *-»^ new rORK BOTANICAL GAROEK CLO MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORy I AI'tllKAlK IS I 11 I III n ill iV 1- 2.3":? THE CAICOS GROUP |itii[iiii|iniiiiii|llii|iiii|iiiii Plate 1. CHAMAESYCE VAGINULATA (Griseb.) MiHsp. C vaqinulata (Griseb.) Mi lisp., Long Cay, Ca i cos Group, Bahamas, 7 Mar. Tgll, Millspa'ugh & Mlllspaugh 9237 (NY). 32. Map 1. Distribution of _C. vag inulata Map 2. Distribution of _C, buxi fol ia 33. both the Bahamas and the Galapagos, but most of these are common through- out the intervening tropics, and give no hint of a disjunction of range such as this species would show from those which it resembles. 2. CHAMAESYCE ARTICULATA (Aubl.) Britton, Mem. N.Y. Bot. Card. 6: 51h. 1916, Euphorbia articulata Aubl., PI. Guian., 1: 480, 1775. Type in Herb. Brit. Mus. if extant. Euphorb ia 1 i near is Retz. , Observat iones Botanicae, 3: 32. 1783. Type: Bot. Mus., Lund, Sweden, if extant. _E. linearis heterophylla Kuntze, Rev. Gen. PI., 605. I89I. _C. 1 i near is (Retz.) Millsp., Field Mus. Bot. 2: 410. I9I6. Anisophyl 1 um vahl i i Kl. £• Gke. , Monats. Akad. Berlin 1859: 36. 1859. Type: Specimen by Willdenow, in Bot. Mus. Berlin, if extant. Euphorbia vahl i i Willd. ex Kl. S- Gke,, loc. cit. 37. 1859. Chamaesyce vahl ii (Kl. & Gke.) P. Wilson, Bull. N.Y. Bot. Gard. 8: 395. 1917. Shrub; to 6m., erect. Stems to 2 cm. at base, internodes to 5 cm. long; divaricate-branched throughout length, glabrous or canescent at tips, light brown becoming black with age. Leaves membranous; blades elliptic, broadly so to linear, 20-60 x 2-12 mm., base subequal, rounded, margin entire, slightly thickened, apex obtuse, mucronate, midrib promi- nent on underside, glabrous or short pubescent, light green; petiole 1 to 1.5 mm. long; stipules joined, deltoid, to 0.5 mm. long, densely ciliate on inner surface, somewhat persistent. Cyathia solitary; peduncles 5 to 7 mm. long, involucre obconical, to 2 mm. diameter at mouth, lobes scarcely equalling glands, deltoid, glabrous on outside, densely ciliate within, glands broadly transversely elliptic, to 1 mm. long, broadly cupped, appendages absent, fifth gland deltoid, short, sinus broad, shallow. 3^. Staminate flovvers 8-20 per cyathium, androphores glabrous, to 2.5 nim. long at maturity. Gynophore glabrous, to 3 n™. long at maturity, ex- serted, nutant; calyx vestigial; ovary glabrous; styles erect, to 3 mm. long, joined for half length, bifid in apical 1/3. Capsule glabrous or minutely pubescent, ovoid or conical, 2.3 nim. long, 2.3 mm. wide above base, roundly three-lobed, angles rounded. Seed elliptic-ovoid, 1.8 - 2 mm. long, 1.2 - 1.4 mm. radial width at equator, four-angled, the dorsal faces longer and dorsal angle more acute than others, surface pitted and wrinkled, brown or ashen. Frequent from Puerto Rico south through the Lesser Antilles to the northern coast of South America. No collections have been seen from the Bahamas since those of Millspaugh in 1911 from East Caicos, but these specimens are undoubtedly of the species (Map 10). Representative specimens seen: BAHAMAS. East Caicos: Rocky plain, Jacksonville and vicinity, 26-27 Feb. 1911, Millspaugh S- Millspaugh 9086 (F, NY); Low scrub, Jacksonville and vicinity, 26-27 Feb. 1911, Millspaugh & Millspaugh 9102 (F, NY). PUERTO RICO. Susua State Forest, 28 June I96I, Alain 9265 (U); Yauco, 2 Apr. I88O, Garber s.n. (GH) ; Seashore, Fajardo, 17 Feb. I9OO, Heller 4608 (F, GH, MO, NY); Santurce, 21 Feb, 1900, Heller 4678 (F, MO, NY); Rio Piedras, Fajardo, k July 1913, Johnston 792 (NY); Guayanilla to Tallahoa, 13 Mar. 1913, Shafer 1993 (F, NY); Fajardo, 19 May 1885, Sintenis 16)2 (MO, NY). LESSER ANTI LLES. Culebra, 3-12 Mar. I906, Britton & Wheeler k (F, NY); Culebras Island, 19-20 Jan. 1899, Millspaugh I78I (F); Racoon Bay, St. Thomas, 31 Jan.- k Feb. 1913, Britton, Britton & Shafer 167 (F, NY); St. Thomas, Jan. I887, Eggers s.n. (F) ; Tortola, 16 Nov. I9I8, Fishlock 263 (F, GH, NY); Anagada, 19-20 Feb. 1913, Britton S- Fishlock 978 (NY); Barbuda, 6 Apr. 1956, Smith 10466 (GH, IJ). St. Kitts: Canada Estate, 8 Sept. -5 Oct. I9OI, Britton £- 35. .... .^..- ''^Y |iiiiiitii|iJM|iiii|iiii|iiimiii|im|iiii|iui|ilii|iili|iiii|iiii|liiiiiiiiiii!n^ 3lkyilil!liiilililililJ5iklllJiul5iliii:. '' Plate 2. CHAMAESYCE ARTICULATA (Aub1.) Britton E. linearis Retz., St. Thomas, ? Bertero (MO). 36. Cowell 263 (NY); Sir Timothy's Hill, 24 Dec. 1958, Proctor l84l8 ( IJ) ; Nag's Head, 27 Dec, 1958, Proctor 18514 (iJ). Antigua: Santa Maria Hill, 25 Apr. 1937, Box 756 (MO); Nook Hill, 3 Oct. 1937, Box 1134 (MO), Montserrat, 8 Feb. 1959, Proctor 19079 (U); Guadeloupe, 1892, Duss 2451 (NY); Martinique, Sieber 392 (F) ; St. Lucia, 22 Apr.-l8 May 1950, Howard 11417 (iJ). St. Vincent: Mt, Pleasant, 22 Mar. I962, Cooley 8534 (GH); Bequia, 26-31 Mar. 1950, Howard 11269 (GH). The affinities of this species are with _C. myrt i 1 1 i fol ia (L.) Mi lisp, and with coastal species of the Bahamas and Florida such as _C. lecheoides (Mi lisp.) Mi lisp, and _C. porter iana Small. These, however, differ in size, habit, cyathial and stipular characters. A number of pubescent collections of _C. art iculata have been compared with the more common glabrous plants, but these prove to be only the extremes of a range, with many intermediates showing occasional shoots with minute velvety pubescence. The name is accepted although no type material has been seen. There is general agreement in the literature with this application, and that _E, 1 i near i s is a synonym. 3. CHAMAESYCE 3UXIF0LIA (Lam.) Small, Fl. SE. uS., 712. I9O3. Euphorbia buxi fol ia Lam., Encyc. 2: 421, 1786. Type: plate in manuscript of Botanicum Americanum t.4, f.2 by Plumier, in the Bibliotheque General, Museum D'Histoire Naturelle, Paris. _E. qlabrata Sw, , Prodr., 76, 1 788 . Type: unknown. A specimen from Swartz v;ith this name is reported from Herb. Stockholm, Fawcett & Rendle, Fl. Jam., 4(2): 336. 1920. _E. 1 itoral is HBK, , Nov, Gen, et Sp., 2: 44. I8I7. Type: Cumana, prope Bordones (Herb. Mus. Paris, not seen). _E. f lexuosa HBK., Nov. Gen. et Sp., 2: 44. I8I7. Type: Cumana, 37. Bonpland (Herb. Mus. Paris, not seen). _E. bux i fol ia Lam. var. f lexuosa (HBK.) Boiss. in DC, Prod., 15(2): 15. 1862. Perennial shrub or subshrub; erect to ascending, or nearly decumbent in shifting sand, to 6 dm. Stems to 8 mm. diameter at nalwi^<' _ ?^^ .'^~ Plate 9, CHAMAESYCE PORTERIANA Small \iar . PORTERIANA Holotype: C, porteriana Small, Miami, Florida, 1877, Garber s.n. (NY) 60. 1 J^ :^..- a^rft^sg THE NEW YORK BOTANICAL CAHOC 111 II \2 11 II 1 .', Plate 10. CHAMAESYCE PORTERIANA Small var. SCOPARIA (Small) ined. Holotype: _C. scopar ia Small, Big Pine Key, Monroe County, Florida, 17 Nov. 1912, Smal 1 3819 (NY). Map 7. Distribution of _C. porter iana var. keyens i s Map 8. Distribution of _C. porter iana var. porter iana Map 9. Distribution of C. porteriana var scopar ia /-,--,- i" --^ ^M, , Map 10. Distribution of C. articulata and C. myrtlllifoM^ 63. not hold up on examination of a range of collections. Pubescence seems to be, in general, a very plastic character in the genus, and can rarely be trusted as a major character for the differentiation of species. The texture of the leaves and the coloring of the plant appear to be correlated with habitat, and the branching pattern changes radically with the accompanying vegetation and the period of time since the area was exposed to fire. In consideration of these factors it was deemed more realistic to reduce the species to varietal status until some clear distinction between them can be demonstrated. 7. CHAMAESYCE MYRTI LLI FOL I A (L.) Mi lisp.. Field Mus. Bot. 2: 410. 1916. Euphorbia myrtill ifol ia L. Syst. Nat. ed. 10, 10U8. 1759. Shrub, erect, to 1 m. Stems to 5 mm, diameter, internodes to 4 cm. long; branching open, throughout length, short-pubescent, brown. Leaves membranous; blades elliptic or obovate, 7-15 x 5-iO mm,, base oblique, obtuse or cuneate, margin serrate, often only in upper half, apex emarginate, obscurely mucronate, midrib prominent on lower surface, upper surface glabrous or sparsely pilose, lower pilose-pubescent, yellow- green; petiole to 1 mm. long, short-pubescent; stipules joined for half length, free part narrow, ciliate or toothed. Cyathia solitary at upper nodes; peduncle to 2 mm. long, involucre obconical, to 1.5 mm. diameter at mouth, lobes equalling glands, deltoid, toothed, pilose on outside and within, glands transversely elliptic, 0.5 x 0.2 mm., dark brown, appendages longer than glands and as wide, margin somewhat dentate, creamy- ye I low, fifth gland linear, short or obsolete, sinus shallow. Staminate flowers 18-30 per cyathium, androphores glabrous, to 1.5 mm. long at maturity, Gynophore short-pubescent, to 3 mm. long at maturity, exserted, upright; 64 I -^ II II I .) ■--riTni. „r Mim, j ir.r)lt\ or J.v.MAK V i'",.h SI.. AJiBRrir Plate 11. CHAMAESYCE MYRTI LL I FOL I A (L.) Millsp. L' myrtillifoli^ L., Gordon Proctor 9595 (NY). Town, St. Andrew, Jamaica, 8 Dec. I954, 65. calyx a pad of tissue or obsolete; ovary sparsely pilose; styles spread- ing, to 1 mm. long, joined at base, bifid for one-third length. Capsule sparsely pubescent, glabrate, ovoid with truncate or cordiform base, 2,2 mm. long, 2.3 nim, wide above base, broadly three-lobed, angles rounded. Seed long-conical, to 1.8 mm. long, triangular with ventral angle obso- lete, others acute, dorsal faces convex, strongly wrinkled, base truncate, dark reddish-brown. Reported only from the Gordon Town and Guava Ridge area of the Blue Mountains of Jamaica (Map 10), Specimens seen: JAMAICA. St. Andrew: Near Gordon Town, 23 May 189^, Harris 5196 (NY); Valley of Hog Hole River above Gordon Town, 8 Dec. 195^, Proctor 9595 (iJ, NY); lA mile northeast of Gordon Town, 20 Mar. 1956, Proctor 118?^ (GH, IJ) . The affinities of this species are with the shrubby £. art iculata, but it differs from that species in being smaller and having elliptic leaves which are pilose on the under surface. The involucre of C. myr- t i 1 1 i f o 1 i a is smaller, with less prominent glandular appendages, and the style and other floral parts are reduced proportionally. 8. CHAMAESYCE NUTANS (Lag.) Small, Fl. SE, US. 712. 1903. Euphorbia nutans Lag., Gen. et Spec, PI. 17. I8l6, Type: "Habit, [at] in N.[ova] H.[ispania]. Perhaps at Madrid , , ," (Wheeler, 19^+1). _E. presl i i Guss. , Fl, Sic, Prod, 1: 539- 1827. Type: Palermo, Italia, Todaro (fragment F seen by Wheeler), C. presl i i (Guss,) Arthur, Torreya 11: 260, 1912. _E. hyper ici fol ia L. var. communi s Engelm. in Emory, U.S, & Mex. Bound, Surv. 2: 188. 1859. Type: New Mexico, 1851-52, C. Wright 18^+2 66. (fragment F seen by Wheeler). _E. hyper i c i f o 1 ia L, sensu Michaux, Fl. Bor.-Am., I803; Torrey, Fl. State New York, 1843. E^, maculata L. sensu Wheeler. Contr. Gray Herb, 127: 7^. 1939. Annual; erect or ascending to 8 dm. Stem to k mm, thick at some- what woody base, internodes to 3 cm, long; branched mostly from upper nodes, young tips and a line on older stem densely tomentose, glabrate, straw-colored or darker brown. Leaves membranous; blades ovate- lanceolate, often somewhat oblong or falcate, 10-30 x 6-10 mm., base inequilateral, rounded, margin serrate, apex acute to obtuse, glabrous or sparsely long-pilose on upper surface, more generally long-pilose below, both surfaces mid-green often with a red spot on upper surface or the whole suffused with red; petiole 1-2 mm. long; stipules joined or nearly distinct near tip of shoot, triangular to 1 mm. long, margin toothed and ciliate, thin textured, brown. Cyathia borne singly in lateral and terminal short-stalked compound dichasia; peduncle 0.5 - 2 mm. long, involucre campanulate, 0.7 - 1 mm. diameter, lobes triangular exceeding glands, subentire or deeply laciniate, glabrous outside, slightly hairy within, glands broadly transversely elliptic, 0.1 - 0.3 mm. long, appendages obsolete or to three times width of gland, white or pink, fifth gland linear, shorter than lobes, sinus shallow. Staminate flowers 5-l4 per cyathium, androphores glabrous, 1 mm. long at maturity. Gynophore glabrous, to 2 mm. long at maturity, exserted, upright or nutant; calyx obsolete; ovary glabrous; styles spreading, O.k - 1 mm. long, minutely joined at base, bifid for 1/3 - 1/2 length. Capsule glabrous, broadly ovoid with somewhat flattened base, 1.8 - 2.3 mm. long, 2 - 2.3 mm. diameter 67. 91 (1.-1 5 la !'< >• Plate 12. CHAMAESYCE NUTANS (Lag.) Small r nut^n^ aaa ) Small, between Marianna and Campbell ton, Jackson County, ?io7fS7^7 Nov! 196U, Godfrey 6U932 (FLAS). 68, below equator, strongly three-Iobed, angles subacute. Seed oblong-ovoid, to 1.3 mm. long, 0.8 mm. wide at equator, ventral angle rounded and obscure, others well marked, faces convex, rippled, black, often with 1 ight ang les. A common weed of the eastern United States reaching its southern limit in north Florida. it is possible that it was present as a weed of cultivated ground in Puerto Rico and many of the Caribbean islands as reported by Britton and Wilson (1924), but almost all of the speci- mens in NY and F on which these records might have been based prove to be mis ident i fi cat ions of plants of _E. hyssopi fol ia L. and E^. hyper ici fol ia L. The collections by Fredholm and by Hitchcock from central Florida are correctly named, but no more recent records have been obtained from this area in spite of heavy collecting, and it is doubtful that the species is present as more than a short-lived, casual introduction, (Map 11). Specimens seen: FLORIDA. Alachua: June-July I898, Hitchcock 1697 (F), Brevard: Okeechobee region, 17 Sept, I9O3, Fredholm 60l4 (GH, NY), Citrus: June-July I898, Hitchcock 1699 (F, MO), Gadsden: Jim Woodruff Dam, Chattahoochee, 19 Oct, I963, Burch 207 (FLAS, IJ, US); River Junction, 7 Aug. 1927, Wiegand & Manning I8I8 (GH) ; Chattahoochee, 7 Aug. 1927, Wiegand & Manning I8I9 (GH) ; Chattahoochee, 8 Sept. 1931, West s.n, (FLAS). Jackson: Marianna, 19 Oct. I963, Burch 210 (FLAS); near Cottondale, 26 Oct. 1964, Burch 504 (FLAS, MO, NCU, NY); between Marianna and Campbel 1 town, 7 Nov. 1964, Godfrey 64932 (FLAS, FSU) ; Marianna State Park, 15 Sept. I96O, Mitchell 839 (FSU); Marianna Caverns State Park, 19 Nov, I96O, Mitchell 903 (FSU). Leon: Tallahassee, 11 Sept, 1942, Henry & Baggs s.n. (FLAS); 18 Sept. 1942, Kurz s.n. (FLAS); Tallahassee, 2-3 Sept. 1895, Nash 2519 69. (F, GH, NY). Levy: June-July I898, Hitchcock 1 698 (F). Wakuila: Newport, 13 Sept. I96U, Godfrey 64618 (FLAS). Walton: Northwest section, 9 July 1964, Hume s.n. (FLAS), Washington: west side of Careyville, 26 Oct, 1964, Burch 499 (FLAS). Extra-territorial specimens: BERMUDA, North Shore, 31 Aug. -20 Sept. 1905, Brown & Britton 8 (F, NY); Devonshire, 31 Aug. -20 Sept. 1905, Brown & Britton 79 (F, NY); Devonshire, 19 Aug. I963, Manuel 265 (A). This species bears a strong resemblance to C_. hyper ici fol ia (L.) Millsp., _C. hyssopi fol ia (L.) Small and C. las iocarpa (Klotzsch) Arth., but may be distinguished by its stem pubescence, limited to the tips and lines at the side of older parts; by the cyathia carried in a leafy dichasium; by the large capsules and by the black, plump seed with a rippled surface. The application by Wheeler (1939) of the name E, maculata L. to this species, rather than to the prostrate plant for which it has been widely used, deserves comment. His case, based on the selection of a specimen from Herb. Linn, as the type, was never proved, since there was some doubt about the identification that Linnaeus made for this sheet. The description of _E. maculata in Species Plantarum is placed among the low- growing rather than the erect species, suggesting that Linnaeus intended it for a prostrate plant and that the traditional application is correct. The use of the name _E. hyperici fol ia L, for this species may be traced to annotations on the Linnaean specimens made by Sir J. E. Smith during the years when he owned the herbarium. Michaux (I8O3) may have examined the material and arrived at the decision independently, but the use in this fashion was confirmed by correspondence between Smith and Torrey when his Flora of the State of New York (1843) was in preparation. 70. Map 11. Distribution of C. nutan; Map 12. Distribution of C. hvper yperici fol ia 71. The basis for Smith's actions was sound in that the description of E. hypericifo] ia in Linnaeus' early works was written from this northern plant. The specific limits were widened to include a tropical plant, however, before the publication of Species Plantarum. and since the name has been used most widely for this entity, the interests of stability of nomenclature are best served by maintaining this application, Burch (I965) deals more fully with the questions relating to the name of this species. 9. CHAMAESYCE HYPERICIFOLIA (L.) Millsp. Field Mus. Bot. 2: 302, 1909. Euphorbia hypericifol ia L., Sp, PI. ed. 1, ^5^. 1753. Type: Sloane Hist. 1, t. 126. (lectotype, designated by Burch, Rhodora 67. I965, in press) . _E. pi lul ifera L. sensu Wheeler, Contr. Gray Herb. 127: 76. 1939. (But see disclaimer, loc. cit, 78). _C. qlomer ifera Millsp. Field Mus. Bot. 2: 377. 1913. Type: El Rancho, Dept. Jalapa, Guatemala, 20 Jan. I908, W. A, Kellerman 8053 (F I). _E, qlomerifera (Millsp,) L, C, Wheeler, Contr, Gray Herb. 127: 78. 1939. Annual or perennating in tropics; erect to ascending, or sprawling to k dm. Stem to 3 mm. diameter at somewhat woody base, internodes to 3 cm. long; branching throughout length particularly in upper part of stem, glabrous, tan to darl< brown. Leaves membranous, blades ovate-elliptic to el 1 ipt ic-obovate, at times somewhat falcate, 15-35 x 8-1^ mm., base inequi- lateral, rounded or cuneate, margin serrate, apex acute, glabrous, green, sometimes purple-spotted above and lighter green on underside; petiole to 1 mm. long; stipules joined, sheathing, 1 - 1.5 mm. long, margin serrate, inner surface pubescent at least at apex, light-brown, or, at upper nodes, separate, to 0.5 mm. long, entire or deeply 2-k cleft. Cyathia in 72. short-stalked, lateral and terminal, congested dichasia forming glomerules with a few basal leaves; involucre short-pedunc led with stipule-like bracts at junction with pedicel, narrow campanulate or more flaring, to 0.8 mm. diameter at mouth, lobes equalling or exceeding glands, triangular, toothed or cleft, glabrous on outside, sparsely long-pilose within, glands subcircular to 0.1 mm. diameter, appendages obsolete or prominent, to 1 mm. wide, entire, white or pink, fifth gland obsolete, sinus shallow, Stami nate flowers 10-12 or rarely only k per cyathium, androphores glabrous, to 0,6 mm, long at maturity. Gynophore glabrous, to 1 mm, long at matu- rity, exserted, nutant; calyx a triangular pad of tissue; ovary glabrous; styles 0,3 mm, long, spreading, minutely joined at base, bifid for 1/2 length. Capsule glabrous, subspher i ca I , to 1,2 mm. diameter, roundly three-lobed, angles rounded. Seed ovoid, to 0.8 mm, long, 0,5 mm, wide, strongly four-sided, ventral angle more obtuse than others, faces flat or convex, wrinkled, light brown. A frequent plant of waste places in Old and New World tropics and subtropics. Common in the southern part of Florida with isolated collec- tions as far north as Sapelo Island, Georgia, and present throughout the Greater and Lesser Antilles (Map 12), Representative specimens seen: FLORIDA, Alachua: University of Florida campus, Gainesville, 30 Oct, 1964, Burch 521 (FLAS) . Broward: Fort Lauderdale, 19-25 Nov. 1903, Small & Carter Gkk (NY), Collier: road to Marco Island, 15 Apr, 1954, West, Arnold & Cooley 14? (FLAS). Dade: vicinity of Homestead, 22 Nov, 1964, Godfrey 65583 (FLAS, FSU) ; Buena Vista, 1 Jan, 1930, Moldenke 330 (DUKE, NY); Miami, 14 May 1904, Tracy 9127 (F, MO, NY). Glades: Ca loosahatchee River bank, 7 Nov. 1964, 73. iiitittiliiitili ■ 1 : ■ rm«i]iin|inmni[nii|nii|iin|nnjiiii|im|iiii]iii:]nii|iiil| i5iiiiiLiiUl3iiiiiliiiiiiJ5iiii Plate 13. CHAMAESYCE HYPERI C I FOL I A (L.) Millsp. C. hypericifol ia (L.) Millsp., University of Florida campus, Gainesville, Alachua County, Florida, 30 Oct. 196^, Burch 521 (FLAS). Ih. Hodgson 230 (FLAS), Highlands: Rd, 25, south of Sebring, 22 June 19^8, Garrett s.n. (FLAS), Lee: Sanibel Island, 13 Apr, 195^, West & Cooley 2630 (USF). Manatee: U.S. k\ & U.S. 19, 29 Nov. I962, Ward & Burch 3I63 (FLAS). Monroe: Upper Mateconbe Key, June, ?? , Curtiss 2486 (F, MO) ; No Name Key, 21 Mar. I898, Pollard, Collins & Morris 126 (F, NY); Key Vaca, 3 Sept. 195^, Thorne 15177 (U); Key Largo, north end, 27 June I96O, Webster & Samuel 10239 (DUKE, PUR). Palm Beach: Jupiter Inlet, west of DuBoise Park, 27 Aug. 1964, Christensen RC-44a (FLAS, FSU). Pinellas: Don Caesar Hotel, St. Petersburg Beach, 24 May 1964, Taylor s.n. (FLAS). Polk: Haines City, 25 June I963, Conard s.n. (FSU). Sarasota: Laurel, 21 Nov. 1964, Godfrey 65273 (FLAS, FSU) . Sumter: Wildwood exit, 1-75, 18 Nov. 1964, Burch 524 (FLAS). Volusia: Pierson, 17 Sept. 1943, West £. Arnold s.n. (FLAS). BAHAMAS. Great Bahama, 5-13 Feb, 1905, Britton £■ Millspaugh 2476 (F, NY); North Bimini, I6 Apr. 1904, Millspaugh 2399 (F, NY). Andros: Mastic Point, 19-28 Mar. I907, Brace 7087 (F, NY); Nicholl's Town, 4-5 Feb. I9IO, Small & Carter 8937 (F, NY). New Providence, Nassau, Nov. 1890, Hitchcock s.n. (F, MO) . Eleuthera: Gregory Town, 6 July 1903, Coker 371 (NY); Governor's Harbor, 14 Nov. I89O, Hitchcock s.n. (F). Cat Island, the Bight £■ vicinity, 1-6 Mar. 1907, Britton 5- Millspaugh 58I6 (F, NY); Watling's Island, Cockburn Town, 12-13 Mar. 1907, Britton & Millspaugh 6053 (F, NY); Great Exuma, 22-28 Feb. 1905, Britton & Millspaugh 2945 (F, NY); Long Cay, 7-17 Dec. 1905, Brace 4036 (F, NY); Inagua, 3 Dec. 1890, Hitchcock s.n. (F, MO) . CUBA. Camaguey: Atalaya, 20 Mar. 1909, Shafer 983 (F, NY). Havana: Havana, 5 May 1905, Curtiss 743 (F, MO, NY). Oriente: Monte Verdi, Jan. -July 1859, Wright 1422 (F, MO, NY). Santa Clara: Cienequita, Cienfuegos, 2 May 1895, Combs 4 (F, MO, NY); Limones, Soledad, 75. Cienfuegos, 27 Sept, 1924, Jack 633^ (MO). GRAND CAYMAN, Georgetown, 2 June 1963, Crosby, Hespenheide, £■ Anderson 50 (DUKE, UCWl); Spot Bay, 13-14 Feb. 1899, Millspaugh 1304 (F), JAMAICA, Portland: Kildare, 21 Aug, 1962, Adams 11555 (UCWl); Port Antonio, 4 Jan. I9O6, Wight 2 (F, NY). St. Andrew: Mount Pleasant, Stony Hill, 21 July 1912, Harris 11134 (F, NY, UCWl); Long Mountain, June 1953, Robbins 434 (UCWl). St. Ann: Mosely Hill Cave, 1 mile west of Blacks tonedge, 12 Dec, 1952, Proctor 7474 (IJ). St, James: Ironshore, May 1953, Asprey 432 (UCWl), Trelawny: Cowie Park near Troy, 19 Oct. 1917, Harris 12646 (F, MO, NY, UCWl). Westmoreland: Negri!, 29 Mar, I962, Adams IO98O (UCWl). HAITI. Jeremie, 13 July 1941, Seibert 1725 (MO) ; Port au Prince, 21-23 Feb. 1920, Leonard 2778 (NY); St. Michel de I'Abalaye, 1927, Ekman 8394 (F, IJ). DOMINICAN REPUBLIC, Barahona, June I9IO, Fuertes 255 (F, MO, NY); San Pedro de Macoris, 26 Mar. 1913, Rose, Fitch & Russell 4154 (NY); Santo Domingo City, 9-10 Mar. 1913, Rose, Fitch & Russell 3769 (NY). PUERTO RICO. Camuey, 14 June-22 July I9OI, Underwood & Griggs 204 (NY); Fajardo Light House, 17 Apr. 1899, Heller 1179 (F, NY); Guanica, 22 Jan. 1899, Millspaugh 753 (F); Guayama, May 1874, Kuntze 554a (NY); Penuelas, 16 July I886, Sintenis 4823 (MO, NY); Rio Piedras, 9 Apr. 1912, Johnston 216 (NY); San Juan, Dec. 1913, Hiorani s.n. (NY), LESSER ANTILLES. St. Thomas: Charlotte Amalie, 17-18 Jan. 1899, Millspaugh 382 (F); Forts Square, Jan. 1877, Eggers s.n. (MO, NY). St. Croix: Bassin Yard, 15 Nov. 1895, Ricksecker 75 (F, MO, NY); Peter's Rest, 2 June 1924, Thompson 772 (NY). Tortola, 18 Sept. I9I8, Fishlock 144 (NY). St, Kitts, 8 Sept.- 5 Oct. 1901, Britton & Cowel 1 (NY). Guadeloupe, Poi nte-a-Pi t re, 19 May 1936, Stehle 1190 (NY); Dominica, Soufriere, 1903, Lloyd 490 (NY). 76. Martinique: Case Pilots, 1879, Duss ^88 (F, MO, NY); Ste. Anne village, 29 July 1939, Egler 39-208 (NY). Barbados: Batinsheba, Apr. -June, 1895, Waby 101 (F); Waterford, St. Michael, 15 Aug. 1906, Dash 166 (F). Grenada, St. George's, 29 Sept, I9O6, Broadway s.n. (F). Extra-territorial specimens: BERMUDA. St. David's Isle, 22 May-6 June 191^, Brown, Britton £■ Bisset 2093 (F, NY); neglected field, 7 July 1921, Degener 1003 (MO). GEORGIA. S.W. section, Sapelo island, 13 Oct. 1956, Duncan 20624 (DUKE, NCU, NSC). The Linnaean name _E. hyper ici fol ia has been applied to this species and to the one known here as _C. nutans. Both elements were represented in the diagnosis and in the synonymy of the original publication in Species PI antarum, and the choice of this species to carry the name was made on the basis of its widespread application in this way dating from Miller's Gardener's Dictionary edition 8 (I768). This matter, and Wheeler's appli- cation of the name to the plant known here as _C. las iocarpa, are discussed in more detail by Burch (1965). The use of the name _E, p i 1 ul i fera L. for this species cannot be accepted if the sheet (63O-8) in the Linnaean Herbarium bearing this name is allowed any status as type material. The identity of the specimen is not clear, but the small part of a seed visible in one capsule showed none of the surface markings character i st ic of seed of _C. hyper i ci fol ia, and the general aspect of the plant was closer to that of _C. hi rta. 10. CHAMAESYCE HYSSOPIFOLIA (L.) Small,J,N.Y. Bot. Card, 3: ^29. 1905. Euphorbia hyssopifol ia L. Syst. Nat. ed 10, 1048. 1759. Type: in Herb, Linn, sheet 63O-9 ! Anisophyllum hyssop i fol i urn (L.) Haw,, Syn. PI. Succ, 161. 1812. _E. hyperi cifol ia L." fi hyssop i fol ia L." Griseb, Fl, Br. 77. W. Ind. Isl., 5^. 1859. E.. bras i 1 iens i s Lam. var. hyssopi fol ia Boiss. in DC. Prod, 15(2): 24. 1862. E. bras I 1 iens is Lam., Encyc. 2: 423. 1786. Type: Mus. Nat., Paris, if extant. _C. brasi 1 iensis (Lam.) Small, Fl. SE, US., 712. 1903. C. ni rurioides Millsp., Field Mus, Bot. 2: 394. 1914, Type: Malvern, Santa Cruz Mountains, Jamaica, 5 Sept. 1907, Britton II86 (holotype: F 1, isotype: NY !). _E. ni rurioides (Millsp,) Fawcett & Rendle, Fl, Jam., 4(2): 339. 1920, _C, jenninqsi i Millsp. in Britton, Bull. Torr. Bot. Club 43; 465, 1916. Type: near Vivijagua, Isle of Pines, Cuba, 7 May 1910, Jennings 621 (Holotype: Herb. Carnegie Mus., portion of holotype F 1; Isotype: NY !). Annual, occasionally perennating; erect or ascending or rarely decumbent, to 6 dm. Stem to 4 mm. thick at somewhat woody base, internodes to 3 cm. long; branched at all levels but most in upper part of plant, glabrous or sparingly long hairy near base, rarely strongly short-pubescent at lower nodes particularly in plants from more tropical areas, straw- colored or darker brown. Leaves membranous; blades very variable, linear- lanceolate, 15-35 X 3-6 mm., with subcordate inequilateral base, margin serrate in upper half, apex acute, to ovate-elliptic, occasionally some- what falcate, 10-30 x 6-10 mm,, with rounded to subcordate inequilateral base, margin generally serrate, apex obtuse, glabrous or sparsely long pilose, on shoots near base of plant, both surfaces mid-green; petiole 1-2 mm, long; stipules joined or nearly free at upper nodes, almost obsolete to deltoid, 0.8 mm. long, margin short-fringed, Cyathia borne singly, terminal and axilary in short-stalked, diffuse or compact, leafy dichasia; peduncle short, involucre commonly narrowly tubular, 0.7 - 1 mm. diameter, 78. sometimes f lar i ng-campanu late, lobes triangular, deep cleft, exceeding glands, glabrous outside, sparsely pilose within, glands transversely elliptic or almost circular, 0.1 - 0.3 mm. long, appendages obsolete to prominent, elliptic, twice as long and three times as wide as gland, white or pink, fifth gland obsolete or tiny, linear, sinus shallow. Staminate flowers 9-20 per cyathium, androphores glabrous, 0.6 - 1 mm. long. Gynophore glabrous, ca. 1 mm. long at maturity, exserted, usually nutant; calyx a triangular pad; ovary glabrous; styles upright or spread- ing, to 0.4 mm. minutely joined at base, bifid for 1/3 - 1/2 length. Capsule glabrous, truncate-cuneiform to broadly ovoid, 1.5-2 mm. long, 1.6 - 1.8 mm. wide just above base, strongly three-lobed, angles subacute. Seed oblong-ovate, to 1 mm. long, 0.5 mm. wide, four-angled with ventral angle less acute than others, faces flat, marked with transverse ridges, a central longitudinal ridge sometimes on dorsal faces, brown or black, angles sometimes light. Widespread throughout Florida and sporadically to South Carolina, common in all parts of the Caribbean except the Bahamas, where the reports for New Providence and Eleuthera (Britton and Millspaugh, 1920) are probably based on collections by Britton and Coker (NY !) which prove to be mi s ident i f icat ions of plants of _C. hyper ici fol ia (L.) Millsp. (Map 13). Representative specimens seen: FLORIDA. Alachua: Pineland, Gaines- ville, 15 June 1910, Hood 24465 (FLAS, MO); University of Florida campus, Gainesville, 10 Sept. 1956, Jackson 707 (FLAS). Baker: Olustee National Forest, 28 Nov. 1955, Krai 1572 (FSU). Brevard: Melbourne, 22 Aug. 1958, Krai 7971 (FLAS, GH, NY, USF). Broward: Pinelands, Ft. Lauderdale, 19 & 25 Nov. 1903, Small £■ Carter ll4l (F, NY); U.S. 27, north of Andytown, 79. Plate lU, CHAMAESYCE HYSSOPIFOLIA (L.) Small C. hyssop i fol ia (L.) Small, Fairchild Tropical Gardens, Dade County, ?iorida, 31 December 1962, Burch 52 (FLAS). oitAiiAJiSTCS NIRUHIOIDRE sp.noT. 80, |JIII|llll|llll|lllllll ijiiiinii|iiii|iiii|iiii|iiii|iiii|rni|iiiiniii|Tiii|iiii|iiir|iin|jiM|iniinii|iiii|in iiii|nii|iiii|iiiinm|iiii|iMi|ini|Jiii|iiimiiimii|nim^ !?iliuliiiJiiiHiliiikwJilii liiiiUiLiJiii THE NEW YORK BOTANICAt GARDEN A/ n e ./?-'' Plate 15. CHAMAESYCE HYSSOPIFOLIA (L.) Small Isotype: C, nirurioides Mi lisp., Malvern, Santa Cruz Mountains, Jamaica- 5 Sept. 1907, Britton 1186 (NY). ' i:|illl|llll|nil|IHI|llll|llll|llll|llll|llll|llll|llll|ll!l|llii|ilijilil|iHI|ilMM PLANTS OF ISLE OF PINES Plate 16. CHAMAESYCE HYSSOPIFOLIA (L.) Small Isotype: _C. jenn i ngs i i Millsp. in Britton, near Vivijagua, Isle of Pines Cuba, 7 May 1910, Jennings 621 (NY). 82. 26 Jan, I963, Ward & Burch 3338 (FLAS) . Calhoun: N.W. of Blountstown, 25 Oct, 1964, Burch 506 (FLAS). Charlotte: Charlotte Harbor, 21 Nov. 1964, Godfrey 65360 (FLAS); Peace River, 13 Aug, I963, Burch I85 (FLAS), Citrus: Dunnellon, 16 June 1958, Krai 69OI (FLAS, FSU, USF) . Collier: Immokalee, 26 Sept. 1964, Lakela 27492 (USF). Dade: Buena Vista, 1 Jan, 1930, Moldenke (DUKE, F, MO, NY); Miami-Kenda 1 1 Station, 5 Nov, I9O6, Small & Carter 2521 (NY), Duval: Jacksonville, 17 Nov, 1929, Moldenke 5232 (NY). Franklin: Apa lach i cola , 2 Nov. 1875, Chapman 3844a (MO, NY), Gadsden: Greensboro, 9 July 1955, Godfrey 53614 (DUKE, FSU, NY). Hendry: La Belle, 19 Apr. 1930, Moldenke 5911 (NY). Hernando: Brooksville, 3 Sept. 1959, Ray 9461 (USF). Highlands: Childs, 3 Mar. 1945, Brass 14744 (US); Sebring, 25 Apr. I96O, Ray, Gleason & Eaton 9728 (USF). Hillsborough: Tampa, 20 Mar. 1923, Churchill 546 (MO, US); Oldsmar, 12 Aug. i960, Ray, Lakela & Patman IOOO6 (USF), Jackson: between Mari- anna & Campbell ton, 7 Nov, 1964, Godfrey 64933 (FSU). Lake: Eustis, 16-30 June I894, Nash 1076 (F, MO, NY), Lee: Ft. Myers, July-Aug. I9OO, Hitchcock 324 (F, MO, NY); 5 miles east of Ft. Myers Beach, 1 Aug. 1958, Krai 7539 (GH, USF). Leon: Tallahassee, 30 June 1955, Godfrey 53571 (DUKE, FSU, NY). Marion: Silver Springs, 1 Oct. I963, Godfrey 63145 (FSU), Manatee: Bradenton, 13 June I9I6, Cuthbert 1312 (NY); Cortez, 19 July 1958, Jackson 732 (FLAS), Martin: Stuart, 3 Sept, 1944, West & Arnold s,n, (FLAS), Monroe: Key Largo, 26 Jan. I963, Ward £■ Burch 3332 (FLAS). Nassau: Fort Clinch, 12 Oct. I963, Burch 195 (FLAS). Okaloosa: Ft. Walton Beach, 24 Oct. 1964, Burch 470 (FLAS), Okeechobee, 27 Dec. 1964, Burch 589 (FLAS), Orange: Orlando, 21 June 1900, Curtiss 667O (MO, NY), Osceola: St, Cloud, 27 Feb. 1952, Cooley 1032 (USF). Palm Beach: between Palm Beach & Lake 83. Worth, 7 Aug. I963, Burch 119 (FLAS), Pasco: Land O'Lakes, 10 July 1958, (FLAS, GH, NY). Pinellas: St. Petersburg, 23 Sept. 1907, Deam 2758 (MO). Polk: Lake Hamilton, 30 Sept, 1962, Conard s.n. (FLAS), Putnam: Welaka, 5 Aug. 19^0, Laessle s.n. (FLAS). St. Lucie: Ft, Pierce, 7 Aug. I963, Burch 122 (FLAS). St, Johns: Ponte Vedra, 11 Oct, 1964, Burch 437 (FLAS). Sarasota: Osprey, 10 Mar, 1904, Smith 712 (DUKE). Sumter: Wi thlacoochee River bridge, 8 Nov. 19^6, West & Arnold s.n. (FLAS), Suwannee: Live Oak, k Oct. 196^, Elam s.n. (FLAS). Volusia: Daytona Beach Shores, 3 Aug. I962, Ray 11159 (USF). Wakulla: 3 Nov. 1964, Godfrey 64887 (FLAS, FSU). Washington: Chipley, 31 July 1954, Ford & Arnold 386O (FLAS). CUBA. Camaguey: La Gloria, Feb. 1909, Shafer 285 (F, NY). Cienfuegos: Colonia Limones, Ingenio Soledad, 24 Jan, 1903, Pringle 59 (F, MO, NY); 2 May 1895, Combs 3 (F, MO, NY), Havana: Guanabacoa, 27 Jan. 1905, Curtiss 6I8 (F, MO, NY); Havana, Apr. 1903, Shafer 91 (F). Isle of Pines: Nueva Gerona, 19 Dec, 1903, Curtiss 244 (F, NY), Oriente: Bayate, I8 July 191^, Ekman 2012 (NY), Pinar del Rio: Herradura, 26-30 Aug. 1910, Britton, Britton, Earle & Gager 6332 (F, NY); between Vinales and Pinar del Rio, I6 June 1953, Webster 4670 (PUR). San Pedro: banks of Ariguanaba lagoon, 5 Apr. 1923, Leon 11417 (NY), Santa Clara: Hoyo de Manicaragua, 26-28 Feb. I9IO, Britton, Britton £• Wilson 4660 (F, NY); Rio Hondo Plains, 5 May 1903, Cook & Doyle 528 (F). JAMAICA. Clarendon: Alley, 11 Feb. 1947, von der Porten s.n. (IJ); Kupuis, 23 June 1955, Proctor 10330 (IJ). Hanover: Negri 1 to Bloody Bay, 12 Sept. 1962, Adams II663 (UCWl). Manchester: Lititz, 5 Nov, I96I, Adams 9864 (UCWl). Portland: Port Antonio, Dec. I89O, Hitchcock s.n, (MO) . St, Andrew: Con- stant Spring to Bardowie, 2 Aug, 1915, Harris 12112 (F, MO, NY, UCWl); Sk. Hope, 18 Aug. 1897, Harris 6803 (F, NY, UCWl); road to Constitution Hill, 20 Oct. 1905, Harris 9035 (F, NY, UCWl); University of West Indies campus, 4 June I963, Crosby, Hespenheide S- Anderson 60 (F). St, Catherine: Bog Walk, 17 Dec. I89O, Hitchcock s.n. (MO). St. Thomas: Morant Bay, 6 Dec. 1959, Adams 5678 (UCWl); Port Morant, 2k Dec. I89O, Hitchcock s.n. (MO). Westmoreland: Bluefields & vicinity, 6-7 Mar, I9O8, Britton £■ Hollick 19^3 (F, NY). HAITI. Gonaives, Dec. 1899, Buch 278 (IJ); La Gonave, 9 Aug. 1927, Ekman 8862 (A); Mt. La Porte, near Pilate, 21 Aug. 1903, Nash 628 (NY); Pol nte-a-p I tre, 12 July I936, Stehle 497 (NY); Port de Paix, 9 Jan. 1929, Leonard & Leonard 135^3 (NY); St. Michel de I'Atalaye, 1 Jan. 1926, Leonard 8501 (MO); San Michel, 5 Aug. 1905, Nash £■ Taylor 1417 (NY). DOMINICAN REPUBLIC. Barahona, Feb. I9IO, Fuertes l49 (F, NY). San Juan: Rio Arriba, 9-14 Sept. 1946, Howard & Howard 8821 (GH, NY). Santo Domingo: Villa Allagracia, 19 Jan. 1929, Ekman Hi 1229 (PUR). PUERTO RICO. Guayani 1 la-Tal lahoa, 13 Mar. 1913, Shafer I976 (F, MO); Martin Pena Station, 20 Feb. 1900, Heller 4665 (F, MO); Punta Arenas, 15 Feb, 1914, Shafer 2896 (F, NY); Rio Piedras, Station Grounds, 2 Oct, 1937, Otero 123 (MO); Utuado, 15-20 Mar, I9O6, Britton & Cowell 409 (F, NY), LESSER ANTILLES. Charlotte Amalie, 17-18 Jan. 1899, Millspaugh 398 (F); Antigua, Belvidere, 15 Aug. 1937, Box 964 (MO); Montserrat, 5 Aug. 1939, Friend 51 (NY); Guadeloupe, Manlve, 1893, Duss 2920 (NY); Martinique, Case-Pi lote, I9OI, Duss 4641 (F, NY); St. Lucia, 7 Sept. 1935, Potter 5508 (GH); St. Vincent, Kingstown, 2 Dec. 1945, Beard 1397 (MO, NY); Grenada, St. George's, 30 Oct. -II Dec. 1957, Proctor 16812 (IJ). _C. hyssopi fol ia (L.) Small may be distinguished from similar species by its combination of usually glabrous stems, cyathia In a leafy dichasium, 85. Map 13. Distribution of _C. hyssop i fol ia \.^-— — I" tfV' Map ]k. Distribution of _C. 1as iocarpa large capsules and seed with prominent transverse ridges on at least the tangential faces. The specimen in the Linnaean Herbarium is of a plant with linear leaves and rather few cyathia in a diffuse dichaslum. This form occurs in most of the islands of the Greater Antilles, and is particularly well- marked on Hispaniola, but grades into the broader leaf form (often on the same plant), and the type specimen represents only the extreme leaf shape of this very variable species. 11. CHAMAESYCE LASIOCARPA (Klotzsch) Arthur, Torreya 11: 260. 1911. Euphorbia lasiocarpa Klotzsch, Nov. Act. Nat, Cur. 19, supp. 1: h]k. 1843. Type: Bot. Mus., Berlin, if extant. _E. hyperici fol ia L. " lasiocarpa Kl." Griseb., Fl. Brit. W. 1. isl. 5^. 1859. (excl. syn. Ba1b.). E. hypericifol ia L. sensu Wheeler, Contr. Gray Herb. 127: 73. 1939. Annual; erect or ascending to 1 m. Stem to 5 mm. thick at somewhat woody base, internodes to 3 cm. long; branched throughout, densely tomen- tose, straw-colored becoming darker with age. Leaves membranous; blades ovate- lanceolate to obovate, somewhat falcate, 15-^0 x 8-20 mm., base inequilateral, rounded to obtuse, margin sharp-serrate, apex acute to ob- tuse, densely gray pubescent, rarely glabrate, green; petioles 2 to 3 nim, long; stipules joined, deltoid to 1 mm., toothed or ciliate, sometimes deeply bifid near tips of shoot. Cythia solitary in lateral and terminal short-stalked compound dichasia; peduncle ca, 1 mm. long, involucre campanulate, 1.2 mm. diameter at mouth, lobes triangular equalling glands, toothed or cleft, densely pubescent on outside, pilose within, glands trans- versely elliptic 0.3 mm. x 0,1 mm., appendages lunate, to three times as 87. long and broad as gland, white, fifth gland deltoid, short or obsolete, sinus to one fourth depth of involucre. Staminate flowers ten to eighteen per cyathium, androphores glabrous, to 1 mm, long at maturity. Gynophore pilose to 1.5 m.n. long at maturity, exserted, nutant; calyx a triangular pad of tissue; ovary strigose; styles upright, to 0.7 mm. long, joined at base, bifid for 1/3 length. Capsule densely pilose, broadly ovoid or conical, 1.5 - 2 mm. long, 2 mm, wide below equator, broadly three-lobed, angles acute. Seed oblong-ovoid, to 1 mm. long, 0,6 mm. wide, strongly four-angled, ventral angle more obtuse and rounded than other three, faces flat, with 2-4 deep transverse ridges, dorsal faces with an additional central longitudinal ridge, black, often with light angles. A common roadside weed in Jamaica and Haiti, less common in Puerto Rico. Collections have been seen from Barbados and Tobago, and the plant is reported from Central America and northern South America (Wheeler, 1939) (Map 14). Specimens seen: JAMAICA. St. Andrew: Kingston, 29 Aug. 1908, Britton 2978 (NY); Irish Town, 17 June I963, Crosby, Hespenheide & Anderson 186 (DUKE, PUR); Liguanea, 7 Feb. I96O, Proctor 20564 (IJ, NY, PUR); Stony Hill, 21 July 1912, Harris 11136 (NY, UCWl), St. Thomas: Easington Bridge, 23 Mar. 1954, Proctor 8512 (IJ). Manchester: Warwick, 8 Nov. I962, Proctor 22886 (IJ). St. Elizabeth: Unity Hill, Aug. I96I, Robertson 9136 (UCWl). HAITI. Port-au-Prince, Sept, 1919, Buch 1713 (U); St. Marc, 25-28 Feb. 1920, Leonard 2954 (NY); Petionville, 15-28 June 1920, Leonard 4967 (NY); St. Michel de I'Atalaye, 26 Dec. 1925, Leonard 8483 (MO); Jean Rabel , 27 Jan.-9 Feb, 1929, Leonard & Leonard 12789 (NY), PUERTO RICO, Coamo, 23 Nov, 1899, Goll 756 (NY); Juana Diaz, 3 Nov. 1913, Hess 4002 (NY). LESSER ANTILLES. Barbados, 30 July I9OI, Freeman s.n. (UCWl); Tobago, 6 Feb. 1913, Broadway 4415 (GH, MO) . This species is distinguishable by the dense pubescence of its stem and leaves, which even the most heavily pubescent specimens of _C. hyssop i fol ia do not approach. in most other characters there is a close resemblance between the two. Wheeler' s appl i cat ion of the name Euphorbia hyper i ci fol ia L. to this species was based on a mi s ident i f led specimen in the Linnaean Herbarium, which was not seen or annotated by Linnaeus until long after the publication of the name. 12. CHAMAESYCE PARC! FLORA (URB.) comb. nov. Euphorbia parciflora Urban in Fedde, Repert. 15: 411, 1919. Type: prope Marmelade, Haiti, 1-2 Aug. 1905, G. V. Nash & N. Taylor 1269 (in Herb, Bot. Mus, Berlin, if extant; Isotype: NY !). Perennial; erect or ascending to 3 dm. Stem to 2 mm. diameter, internodes to 3 mm. long; branched sparsely throughout length, glabrous or sparingly short- tomentose on one surface, dark brown. Leaves membranous; blades ovate, 6-10 x 3-5 mm., base inequilateral, rounded, margin sharply serrate, apex acute to obtuse, midrib distinct, glabrous, olive-green; petiole 1 mm. long; stipules joined, triangular to 1 mm, long, toothed or deeply cleft, sometimes bifid and almost distinct, Cyathia solitary at upper nodes; peduncle slender, to 3 mm. long, involucre campanulate, to 1.8 mm. diameter at mouth, lobes barely exceeding g lands, attenuate, glabrous on outside, densely ciliate within, glands transversely elliptic, 0.6 X 0.1 mm., cupped, appendages as long as gland and up to four times as wide, creamy white, margin entire or crenulate, fifth gland linear, 89. Map 15. Distribution of _C. parci flora Map 16. Distribution of _C. br i tton i i 90. almost equalling lobes, sinus shallow. Staminate flowers 4-12 per cyathium, androphores glabrous, to 1.3 n\m, long at maturity, Gynophore glabrous, to 2.5 mm. long at maturity, exserted, nutant; calyx obsolete or a subcircular pad of tissue; ovary glabrous; styles spreading, 0.5 mm. long, joined at base, bifid for 1/2 length. Capsules glabrous, broadly ovoid, 2 - 2.2 mm. long, 2.5 - 2.8 mm. wide above base, narrowly three- lobed, angles acute. Seed ovate, to 1,3 mm. long, 1 mm. diameter just above base, four-angled, dorsal faces larger than ventral, dorsal angle acute, ventral angle flattened, faces flat, wrinkled, white. Reported only from the mountains of Haiti, at elevations of 500- 2000 m. in pineland or open woods (Map 15). Specimens seen: HAITI. Badeau, 21 Feb. 1927, Ekman H4968 (IJ); Gonaives, June 1901, Buch 63^ (IJ); M, Bonfiere, 29 Sept. 1925, Ekman H7627 (IJ); Petionville, 24 Aug. 1924, Ekman H1593 (U); San Michel to Marmelade, 6 Aug. 1905, Nash & Taylor 1466 (NY). The affinities of this species are not clear. Some of the extreme forms of _C. hyssopi fol ia in Hispaniola have similar cyathia but are narrow- leaved, and plants growing strongly usually develop lateral dichasia of cyathia as they get older. 13, CHAMAESYCE BRITTONI! (Millsp.) Millsp., Field Mus. Bot. 2: 303. 1909. Euphorbia brittonii Millsp., Field Mus, Bot, 2: 159. 1906. Type: Race course. New Providence, 26 Aug. 1904, Britton £• Brace 839 (Lectotype: F '. ; Isotype: NY '.) . Chamaesyce paucipi la (Urb.) Millsp., Field Mus. Bot. 2: 410. I9I6. Euphorbia paucipila Urban, Symb. Ant., 5: 389. 1908. Type: Prope Guanabacoa, Habana, Cuba, August, Baker and Hasselbring 7199 (Holotype: 91. Herb. Estac. Agron,, Havana, Cuba, not seen). Euphorbia niqueroana Urban in Fedde, Repert. 28: 23^. 1930. Type: South of Nlquero, peninsula de Cabo Cruz, Oriente, Cuba, I? Jan. 1923, E. L. Ekman I6I76 (Holotype: Mus. Bot. Stockholm, not seen, photo- graph of holotype and Isotype: NY !). Chamaesyce niqueroana (Urb.) Alain, Contr. Ocas. Mus. Hist. Nat., Col. 'de la Salle', Habana 11: 12. 1952. Perennial; erect or ascending to 1.5 dm. Stem to 1 mm. diameter at base, internodes to 2 mm. long, sparsely branched throughout, sparsely long-pilose particularly at nodes, brown. Leaves membranous; blades ovate-elliptic or somewhat orbicular, 2-5 x 1.5 - 3 mm., base inequilateral, rounded, margin entire or rarely crenate, apex rounded to obtuse, glabrous, or with scattered long hairs, green; petiole 0.5 mm. long; stipules sepa- rate, triangular, to 0.5 mm. long, toothed or 2-3 cleft. Cyathia solitary at upper nodes; peduncles to 0.3 mm. long, involucre campanulate, to 0.7 mm. diameter at mouth, lobes equalling glands, triangular, toothed, glab- rous on outside, ciliate at mouth within, glands broadly transversely elliptic, to 0.2 mm. long, cupped and somewhat stipitate, appendages a rim to twice as wide as gland, fifth gland linear, short, sinus shallow. Staminate flowers 5-10 per cyathia, androphores glabrous, to 0.7 mm. long at maturity. Gynophore glabrous to 0.8 mm. long at maturity, exserted, nutant; calyx a triangular pad of tissue; ovary glabrous; styles spreading, to 0.3 mm. long, minutely joined at base, bifid for 1/3 length. Capsule glabrous, broadly ovoid with somewhat flattened base, 1.2 mm, long, 1.5 mm. wide just above base, broadly three-lobed, angles acute. Seed broadly conical-ovoid, 0.8 mm. long, 0.6 mm. wide below equator, four-angled, dor- sal faces larger than ventral, dorsal angle more acute than others, brown. 92. i|iNiiiiii{iiii{iiii|iiii|iiii|iiii|iiii|iiii|iiii|iiii|iiii|iiii|iiii|iiii|ini|iiii|iiii|iiii|iiii|iMi|iiii|i 2| ' 3| '4 ' 6 iii|iiii|nii|iMi|iiiiiMimiii|iiiiiiHi|iiiiiiiii|ini|iiii|iiii|iiiiiiiiiiiMiiiiiiiiiii| l?iltljlllllllll^lllllllhiiliRllthlllllllil^illlJllllllll^llililililihUililllllililJ Plate 17. CHAMAESYCE BRITTONll (Millsp.) Millsp. Isotype: E. bri ttoni i Mi 1 1 sp. , Race course, New Providence, Bahamas, 26 August 1904, Britton & Brace 839 (NY). 93, Sandy areas and barrens of several Cuban provinces, and from whitelands of New Providence, Bainamas (Map 1 6) , Specimens seen: BAHAMAS. New Providence, near race course, 26 Aug. 1904, Britton & Brace 279 (NY). CUBA. Havana, Loma de la Cruz, 27 Oct. 1927, Leon I3O89 (NY). Las Villas: west of Santa Clara, 1-20 July 1950, Howard, Briggs, et al. 4l6-b (A). Matanzas: Corral Nueva, 13 Oct. 1927, Leon I3IOI (NY); San Miguel de los Banos, 10 Oct. 1950, Alain A 157^ (NY). Oriente: Guantanamo Bay, 17-30 Mar. I9O9, Britton 2159 (NY). Santa Clara: Loma de Belen, 2k June 1932, Leon I5628 (NY); Placetas del sur, 10 Aug. I9I8, Leon S-Roca 8l45 (NY); Sti. Spiritus, 27 Aug, 1909, Leon 1352 (NY); Serpentine Barrens near Santa Clara, June 1941 , Howard 5106 (GH). The three species, which are here combined, vary in the degree of pubescence which they show but have no characters on which to base a consistent separation. The group differs from the least pubescent forms of _C. turp in i i only in habit and in the pubescent capsule of that species, and f rom _C. i nsulaesal is only in its complete lack of pubescence. When more collections are available, the species limits set here may well need revi s Ion. 14. CHAMAESYCE COWELLII Mi lisp, in Britton, Bull. Torr. Club 43: 457. 1916. Type: Cayo Muertos, Puerto Rico, 9-12 Mar. 1915, Britton, Cowell & Brown 5007 (Holotype: F 1; Isotype: NY !). Perennial from a thickened rootstock; prostrate, forming mats to 15 cm. diameter. Stems many, wiry, ca. 0.5 mm. diameter, Internodes to 1 cm.; branching throughout length, nodes not rooting, glabrous, brown or ashen. Leaves chartaceous; blades ovate-elliptic, somewhat reniform near 9^. base of stem, 2-5 x 1-3 mm,, base oblique, cordate or obtuse, margin entire, apex emarginate, rounded or obtuse, glabrous, obscurely papillose, green or ashen; petiole 0.4 - 0.6 mm. long; stipules joined at base, 0,3 mm, long, deeply cleft, sometimes ciliate on surface near stem, Cyathia solitary at upper nodes; peduncle short, involucre obconical, to 0,6 mm. diameter at mouth, lobes equalling glands, deltoid, glabrous on outside, ciliate within, glands transversely elliptic, 0.2 mm. long, somewhat cupped, appendages a rim to slightly wider than gland, fifth gland short or obsolete, sinus to one-third depth of involucre. Staminate flowers 6-]k per cyathia, androphores glabrous, to 0.8 mm. long at maturity. Gyno- phore glabrous, to 1 mm. long at maturity, exserted, nutant; calyx obsolete; ovary glabrous; styles spreading, to 0,2 mm. long, joined at base, bifid for half length. Capsule glabrous, ovoid, 1.2 mm. long, 1.4 mm, wide at equator, sharply three-lobed, angles acute. Seed long-ellipsoid, to 1 mm. long, strongly four-angled with ventral angle somewhat rounded, other angles acute, surface slightly convex, obscurely wrinkled, tan or darker brown. Found in crevices of coastal limestone cliffs, Antigua and Cayo Muertos, Puerto Rico (Map 17). Specimens seen: PUERTO RICO. Sardinera, Mona Island, 20-26 Feb, 1914, Britton, Cowell & Hess 1670 (NY). LESSER ANTl LLES. Antigua: Soldier Point, Half-Moon Bay, 1 May 1938, Box 1426 (NY); near English Harbor, 18 July 1937, Box 900 (BM, NY) , The resemblance between this species and C. turpinii in all charac- ters except the pubescence of the latter suggests a close relationship. Future collections may indicate that the two should be separated at only the varietal level, but until more material is available the existing names 95. -i-?-.-^ iiiiiiiiij •aJiiJiiiliii fpp^ EW VOHK BOTANICAL txitomTi' IN ut i' (-:._■ t- CATO MuCKTOt ("^ Plate 18. CHAMAESYCE COWELLII MiHsp. in Britton Isotype: Z. cowel 1 i i Millsp., Cayo Muertos, Puerto Rico, 9-12 March 1915, Britton, "Cowe 1 1 & Brown 5007 (NY). 96. A^^- Map 17. Distribution of C. cov/e 1 li i Map 18. Distribution of C. blodqetti 97. will be malnta ined. There is a description of the species filed with the type specimen in F which was probably drawn up by Millspaugh and sent with the name to Britton for the publication. The citation was made in the form that reflects this authorship. 15. CHAMAESYCE BLODGETTI I (Engelm. ex Hitchc.) Small, Fl. SE. US. 712. 1903. Euphorbia blodgett i i Engelm. ex Hitchc, Ann. Rep. Mo. Bot. Gard. 4: 126, I893. Type: Key West, Florida, Blodgett s.n. (Lecto- type: MO '. , fragment F !, isotype: NY 1). _E. bermudiana Millsp., Field Mus. Bot. 2: 65. 1900. Type: Walsing- ham, Bermuda, 31 Dec. I898, Millspaugh 6OIOI (Holotype: F i, Isotype: F I, NY i). E_. cozumelensis Millsp., Field Mus. Bot. 2: 61. I9OO. Type: East Shore, Cozumel Island, 21 Feb. I899, Millspaugh 6I6O6 (Holotype: F !). jC. nashi i Small, Fl. SE. US., 709. I9O3. Type: Tampa, Hillsborough County, Florida, 20 August 1895, Geo. V. Nash 2427 (Distributed as Euphor- bia maculata) (Holotype: NY 1, Isotypes: F i, GH 1, US i). Chamaesyce chiogenes Small, Fl. SE. US. 709. 1903. Type: Key West, Florida, Blodgett s.n. (Holotype: Herb. Columbia College, if extant; most of this herbarium now in NY, but sheet there not marked with Columbia stamp, ? isotype 1; portion of isotype F !). _E. batabanensis Urb., Symb. Ant., 5: 390. I9O8. Type: Prope Batabano, prov. Havana, Cuba, October, Baker £• Wilson 2212, 2341, 2375 (Syntypes: Herb. Bot. Mus. Berlin, if extant; Baker & Wilson 2301 NY '. - mistake in number?). Annual, sometimes persisting; prostrate to decumbent forming mats to 6 dm. diameter, rarely erect to 3 dm. Stem to 2 mm. diameter, larger in single-stemmed erect plants, internodes to 2 or rarely 3 cm. long; branching throughout length, sometimes rooting at nodes, glabrous, green or brov/n, often with reddish cast. Leaves membranous; blades oblong- elliptic k-6 X 2-3 mm., base inequilateral, rounded or subcordate, margin entire or toothed in upper third, apex mucronulate or obtuse, blades of leaves of laterals smaller, uniform, base usually cuneate, glabrous, green, often suffused red; petiole to 1 mm.; stipules joined on upper surface to I mm. long, deeply bifid with each half several-cleft or toothed, on lower surface longer, triangular, several-cleft, sometimes deeply bifid, light-colored. Cyathia solitary at upper nodes or appearing clustered on congested leafy laterals; peduncle ca. 0.5 mm. long, involucre campanulate, to 0.5 nim. diameter at mouth, lobes equalling glands, tri- angular, entire or toothed, glabrous on outside, pilose within, glands transversely elliptic-oblong, 0.2 x 0.05 mm., appendages obsolete or semi- lunate, to twice as wide as glands, the two nearer the sinus larger than the other pair, white or pink, fifth gland linear, short, sinus shallow. Staminate flowers 8-12 per cyathium, androphores glabrous, to 0.5 mm. long at maturity. Gynophore glabrous, to 0.7 mm. long at maturity, exserted, nutant; calyx a three-cornered pad of tissue; ovary glabrous; styles spreading, to 0.3 mm. long, minutely joined at base, bifid for 1/3 to 1/2 length. Capsule glabrous, conical-ovoid, truncate at base and apex, 1.2 - 1.4 mm. long, 1.4 - 1,6 mm, wide above base, roundly three-lobed, angles acute to obtuse. Seed oblong-ovoid, to 1 mm. long, equally four- angled with rounded angles, faces flat or slightly convex, obscurely wrin- kled, brown or gray-brown. 99. — ^ — = « — M _ ^ 0 111 — z ill 1 1 = r-{ Illlllll 9 i 1 1 nil nil 8 u — • Illlllll 7 — * — 9 Illlllll 4i.- Illlllll 5 — = ^ — — — = w 01- ^ — Z nil II — — 1 Plate 19. CHAMAESYCE BLODGETTIi (Engelm. ex Hitchc.) Small Lectotype: E. blodgett i i Engelm. ex Hitchc., Key West, Florida, Blodgett s.n. (MO). 100, iii|i(ii|iiii|iiiiiinf|iiiiiiiii|irirfiiii|iin|HHiMMi Plate 20. CHAMAESYCE BLODGETTII (Engelm. ex Hitchc.) Small Holotype: C_. nashi i Small, Tampa, Hillsborough County, Florida, 20 August 1895, Geo. V. Nash 2if27 (NY). 101 :i;M|iiii|iin|ini|iiii|iiit|iiii|HH|mMHiMiMi|iMi|iiiiiH:iihii|iiiin^^ iSjiiiLijliiiHiliiJiuliiJftJailuiliiiL^ldJailaJSiiaJailiiiWiU^^ Plate 21. CHAMAESYCE BLODGETTII (Engelm. ex Hitchc.) Small ?|sotype: C. chiogenes Small, Key West, Florida, Blodgett s.n. (NY) 102, A very common component of beach scrub and dune vegetation, and also sandy inland areas, in the southern half of Florida, Bermuda, the Bahamas, Cuba, Jamaica and the Caymans. Only one specimen has been seen from the Virgin Islands, and the absence of the species from Hispaniola south through the Antilles is in striking contrast with its abundance in the other islands (Map 18). Representative specimens seen: FLORIDA. Brevard: Patrick AFB, 24 Sept. 1957, Crawford s.n. (FLAS) ; St, Johns River valley west of Mims, 24 June 1957, Krai S- Sincock 5008 (FSU). Charlotte: Bermont, 7 Nov. 1964, Hodgson 213 (FLAS); Charlotte Harbor, 21 Nov. 1964, Godfrey 65361 (FLAS, FSU), Collier: Naples Beach, 21 Nov. 1964, Godfrey 6544! (FLAS, FSU) ; Tamiami Trail, 1 Apr. 1930, Moldenke 869 (NY); Vanderbilt Beach, 13 Aug. 1963, Burch 184 (FLAS). Dade: Adams Key, 11 Mar. 1915, Small £• Hosier 5729 (NY); Biscayne Bay, Indian River, 1874, Palmer 500 (NY); Cutler to Point Creek, 1 July I9I5, Small, Hosier £■ Small 6689 (HO, NY, US); Homestead Bayfront Park, 20 July 1964, Lakela 27316 (FLAS, USF) ; Hiami Beach, 11 Jan, 1930, Holdenke 390 (DUKE, HO, NY). Glades: Moore Haven, 28 Dec, 1963, Burch 236 (FLAS). Hendry: Big Cypress Seminole Reser- vation, 8 June 1964, Brass 33229 (FLAS); near Clewiston, 9 Apr. 1950, Killip S- Svyallen 40498 (US). Hernando: County line N.E. of Brooksville, 15 Oct. 1964, Burch 449 (FLAS). Highlands: Junction FLA 70 & FLA 17, I8 Nov. 1964, Burch S- Ward 527 (FLAS). Hillsborough: Tampa airport, 7 Sept. 1953. Garrett s.n. (FLAS). Lee: Punta Rassa, 24 June I9I6, Standley 274 (MO, US). Levy: mouth of Wi thl acoochee River, I6 Sept. 1959, Cooley, Eaton Sr V/ard 6984 (DUKE, FLAS, FSU). Manatee: north end Longboat Key, 1 Aug. 1950, Wilbur £- Webster 2509 (US); Manatee, 11 Sept. 1899, Tracy 103. 6374 (F, MO, NY); Sneeds Island, 12 Sept. 1899, Tracy 6373 (F). Monroe: Big Pine Key, 27 Feb. 1911, Small, Carter & Small 3563 (NY); Flamingo, Cape Sable, 26 Nov, I9I6, Small 799^ (NY); Key West, I836, Blodgett s.n, (MO); Lower Matecumbe Key, 18 Mar. 1930, Moldenke 784 (DUKE, MO, NY); Pine Crest, 1 Apr. 1930, Moldenke 853 (DUKE, F, MO, NY, US); Upper Matecumbe Key, Curtiss 2487 (FLAS, GH, MO, NY, US). Okeeclnobee: 3 miles east of Okeechobee City, 3 Feb. 1945, Brass 14593 (US). Pinellas: Maximo Point, St. Petersburg, 10 Sept. 1954, Thorne 15411 (FSU, IJ, NCS, US); north end of Sunshine Skyway Bridge, St. Petersburg, 5 June 1964, Burch 359 (FLAS). St. Johns: Crescent Beach, 14 Oct. 1941, West & Arnold s.n. (FLAS). Sarasota: Longboat Key, 27 Sept. 1964, Burch 426 (FLAS); 2 miles south of Venice, 30 Dec. 1956, Krai 3833 (FSU). Volusia: 9 miles south of New Smyrna Beach at Turtle Mound, 27 Apr, I96I, Ray, Wood et al. IO78O (FSU), BAHAMAS. Grand Bahama: 3 miles SE of Freeport, 1 Nov. 1964, McDaniel & Schmiederer 5428 (FSU); Eight Mile Rocks, 5-13 Feb. I905, Britton £■ Millspaugh 2470 (F, NY). Great Sturrup Cay, 1 Feb. 1905, Britton & Millspaugh 2257 (F, NY); Bimini, 16 Apr, 1904, Millspaugh 2204 (F, NY); Andros, I8 Aug. -10 Sept. I9O6, Brace 5115 (F, NY). New Providence: Ocean Hole, Coral Harbor, 7 July I96O, Webster £• Williams 10328 (PUR); Hog Island, 30 May I9O9, Wilson 8259 (F, MO, NY). Eleuthera, Glass Window, 26 July i960, Webster & Williams IO636 (PUR); Salt Key Bank, Anguilla Isles, 15-18 May 1909, Wilson 7946 (MO, NY); Exuma Chain, Ship Channel Cay, 17 Feb. 1905, Britton S- Millspaugh 2755 (F, NY); Little San Salva- dor, 25-26 Feb. 1907, Britton & Millspaugh 566O (F, NY); Watling's Island, 27-28 Nov. 1907, Wilson 7286 (F, NY); Crooked Island, 24 Nov. I89O, Roth- rock 241 (F, NY). Inagua: South of Matthewtown, 15-25 Aug. I96O, Williams 104. 102 (DUKE, iJ, PUR); 8 miles N.E. of Matthewtown, 15-25 Aug. I96O, Williams 37 (DUKE, PUR). South Caicos: Cockburn Harbour, 26 June 195^, Proctor 8938 (IJ); East Bay, 24 June 1954, Proctor 8915 (U). Grand Turk, between Commissioner's House & airfield, 22-27 Apr. 1954, Lewis s.n. (IJ). CUBA. Camaguay: Cayo Cruz, 27 Oct. 1909, Shafer 2783 (F, NY); Cayo Paredon Grande, 25 Oct. 1909, Shafer 2756 (F, NY). Havana: Batabano, 10 Apr. I903, Shafer 514 (NY). Isle of Pines: Vivijagua, 20 Feb, 1916, Britton, Britton & Wilson, 14692 (F, NY). Pinar del Rio: Coloma, 6 Sept. 1910, Britton, Britton £■ Gager 7007 (F, NY). Santa Clara: Rio San Juan, 24-25 Mar. I9IO, Britton, Earle & Wilson 5915 (F, NY). CAYMAN ISLANDS. Grand Cayman: north of Georgetown, 1 June I963, Crosby, Hespenheide & Anderson 18 (DUKE, UCWl); North Side village, 19 Apr. 1956, Proctor 15123 (iJ); Bodden Bay Road, 13 Feb. 1899, Millspaugh 1333 (F); Jan. I89I, Hitchcock s.n. (MO); Spot Bay, 13-14 Feb. 1899, Millspaugh 1314 (F). JAMAICA. Clarendon: between Portland & Rocky Point, 5 Mar. I908, Britton I9II (F, NY). Kingston: Palisadoes, near Harbour Head, 4 Oct. I96O, Proctor 21392 (IJ, NY, PUR). St. Andrew: Palisadoes, 5 Nov. 1957, Yuncker 17299 (F, MO) . St. Catherine: Cayamanas, June 1952, Asprey 437 (UCWl); Ft. Clarence Hill, 9 Dec. I9O6, Harris 9536 (NY, UCWl). St. Elizabeth: Great Pedro Bay, 6-8 Sept. 1907, Britton 1250 (F, NY); Pedro Bluff, 7 Sept. 1907, Harris 9731 (F, NY, UCWl). Westmoreland: West Point lighthouse, 26 July 1954, Webster £- Wilson 5057 (IJ). LESSER ANTILLES. Tortola, Lower Estate, 8 Oct. I9I8, Fishlock 222 (NY). Extra-territorial specimens: BERMUDA. Hamilton Bay Islets, 29 Dec. I888, Millspaugh 9 (F) ; Jew's Bay, 23 July 1913, Collins 332 (F, NY); North Shore, 31 Aug. -20 Sept. 1905, Brown & Britton 4 105. (F, NY); Warwick March, Sept. 1913, Brown £■ Britton 1719 (F, NY). Hitchcock described this plant after collecting it a number of times in the West Indies, adopting a name used by Engelmann on herbarium sheets but not published. A specimen in Herb. Torrey and Herb. Engelmann is cited as type, and the article is illustrated with a plate in which the habit drawing was made from the upper right hand plant on a sheet which he collected in Grand Cayman in I89I (MO i). Detail on the plate is from sketches probably made by Engelmann. The sheet from Herb. Engelmann (now Mo. Bot. Gard.# 1792993) was probably made from a specimen sent by Torrey for identification, and may well have come from his much fuller sheet which is now in NYBG. it seems likely that only Engelmann's sheet would have been readily available to Hitchcock, and it is designated as lectotype for that reason. The sheet nov; in NYBG is an isotype since it is from the same collection. The sheet from Millspaugh's private herbarium in F includes two numbers. The origin of 196079 is not obvious, but the label data clearly indicates that I96078 is fragments from the Herb. Engelmann specimen and may be considered part of the lectotype. The variability of this species is reflected in the number of attempts which have been made to segregate portions of it as discrete taxa. None of the criteria by which Millspaugh, Small and Urban distin- guished their species holds when a long series Is examined, but there appear to be certain trends which may merit recognition if this seems desirable at a later date. The habit of the plant is most commonly prostrate or decumbent, with several stems from the crown of the root. In Cuba, In Florida on 106. the coast south of Miami, and particularly in the islands on the Atlantic edge of the Bahama chain, there are plants of this species which are strongly ascending or completely erect with one or a few stems from ground level. In all other respects - stipules, leaf-shape, and cyathlal and seed characters - they fall within the limits of variability usual for the species, and often grow interspersed with "normal" plants. Branching pattern shows a similar break from the usual, rather sparingly branched form with cyachia on short laterals, to a much-branched, almost dichotomous form with cyathia solitary and spaced rather widely. Leaf size is often small in these plants. Others show an extreme reduction in laterals, and, with their many small leaves, have a superficial resem- blance to _C. maculata. Branching on some plants shows more than one of these patterns, but in some areas, such as Hendry and Glades counties in Florida, the much-branched habit with small leaves is almost the only form found. The form distinguished by Small as _C. chiogenes is quite widespread in dry, saline areas. The plants have a more chartaceous texture, with the stipules reduced in size, but no way of making a positive identification of the species was found, and it seemed more in keeping with treatment elsev/here in the group to reduce it to synonymy. Chamaesyce blodgettii comes close to C_. serpens in many characters, but can be distinguished by the obscurely wrinkled seed even when the difference in habit and size is less clear than usual. The two occupy a similar set of habitats in their respective ranges, which overlap only in Cuba and Jamaica. w 107. 16. CHAMAESYCE SERPENS (HBK.) Small, Fl, SE. US., 709. I9O3. Euphorbia serpens HBK., Nov. Gen. et Sp., 2: 52. 1817. Type: Cumana, Venezuela, Bonpland 407 (Herb. Mus. Paris, not seen, photograph G and fragment F seen by Wheeler, Rhodora 43: I98. 1941.). Anisophy] 1 urn serpens (HBK.) Kl. S- Gke., Abh. Akad. Berlin, Rhys. 1859: 23. i860. Euphorbia crassinodis Urb., Symb. Ant., 1: 3^0. I899. Type: Cuba, Wright 54-7 p.p., 2014 (Herb. Mus. Bot., Berlin, if extant; sheets i th these collection numbers in GH i, but both are _E. gundlachi i (Urb.)). C. crassinodis (Urb.) Millsp., Field Mus. Bot. 2: 408. I9I6. Placed here in synonymy on the basis of other sheets identified as this species by Urban. _E. pi leoides Millsp., Field Mus. Bot. 2: 62. 1900. Type: Guanica, Porto Rico, 22 Jan. I899, C F. Millspaugh 743 (Holotype: F. not found; Isotype: F '.) . C. pi leoides (Millsp.) Millsp., Field Mus. Bot. 2: 411. 1916. _E. microclada Urb., Symb. Ant., 9: 215. 1924. Type: prope Daiquiri, Oriente Province, Cuba, 23 Nov. I9I6, E. L. Ekman 8430 (Holo- type: Mus. Bot. Stockh. , not seen; Isotype NY i). _C. microclada (Urb.) Alain, Contr. Ocas. Mus. Hist. Nat., Col.'de la Salle', Habana 11: 12. 1952. E.. excisa Urb. & Ekman, Arkiv. Bot. Stockh. 22A(8): 66. 1929. Type: Anse-a-Pi tre, Haiti, 15 Sept. 1926, E. L. Ekman H 6986 (Holotype: Mus. Bot. Stockh., not seen; Isotypes: iJ i, K 1, NY !). _E. biramensis Urb. in Feddes, Repert. 28: 232. 1930. Type: Cienaga de Birama, Oriente Province, Cuba, 10 Jan. 1923, E. L. Ekman 16137 (Holotype: Mus. Bot. Stockh., not seen; Isotypes: NY '. , US i). 108. _C. bi ramensis (Urb.) Alain, Contr. Ocas. Mus. Hist. Nat., Col.'de la Sa.le', Habana 11: 12. 1952. _E. manqjeti Urb. in Feddes, Repert. 28: 233. 1930. Type: Castillo de Atares, Habana, Cuba, 2 Oct. 1921, E. L. Ekman 13293 (Holo- type: Mus. Bot. Stockh., not seen; Isotype: NY i). _C. manqlet i (Urb.) Alain, Contr. Ocas. Mus. Hist. Nat., Col.'de la Salle', Habana 11: 12. 1952. The unpublished name _E. ant iquens is used by Millspaugh on a plant collected in Antigua, 16-17 Jan. 1907, Shafer 20 (NY ;, F 1) should be referred here. Perennial or winter killed; prostrate, forming mats to k dm, diameter. Stem several from somewhat thickened root, to 1 mm. wide, internodes to 3 cm. long; branching throughout length, often rooting at nodes, glabrous, yellowish-green. Leaves membranous; blades ovate, some- times orbicular, 2-6 x 1.5 - ^ mn^.. , base inequilateral, rounded to sub- cordate, margin entire, apex rounded, mucronulate or emarginate, midrib prominent on underside, glabrous, green; petiole ca. 0,5 mm. long; stipules united, deltoid, toothed at apex, to 0.5 mm. long, white. Cyathia soli- tary at upper nodes; peduncle to 1 mm., involucre campanulate, to 0.7 mm. diameter at mouth, lobes equalling glands, deltoid, toothed, glabrous on outside and within, glands transversely elliptic to 0.2 mm. long, usually deep purple, sometimes brown or olive, appendages longer than glands and narrower to twice as wide, margin entire or crenulate, white, fifth gland linear equalling lobes, sinus shallow. Staminate flowers 3-10 per cyathium, androphores glabrous, to 0,5 mm. long at maturity. Gynophore glabrous, to 0.7 mm. long at maturity, exserted, nutant; calyx three-lobed, i09. Plate 22. CHAMAESYCE SERPENS (HBK.) Small C serpens (HBK.) Small, Vicinity of Port de Paix, Haiti, 1 May 1929, leonarcl & Leonard 15242 (NY). no. each lobe often toothed and recurved, to 0.3 nim. long; ovary glabrous; styles spreading, 0.2 mm. long, joined at base, bifid for 1/2 length. Capsule glabrous, ovoid, 1.2 - 1.4 mm. long, 1.4 - 1.6 mm. wide below equator, three-lobed, angles obtuse. Seed oblong-ovoid, to 1 mm. long, equally four-angled with rounded angles, faces flat or slightly convex, smooth, usually brown or gray-brown. A common plant of the Mississippi valley and of scattered occur- rence in most states east of the Rocky Mountains. Collected only as a ballast plant in Florida, and the last collection from the site in Pensacola was in 1897. Present in Cuba, Jamaica, Hispaniola, Puerto Rico and islands of the Lesser Antilles to South America (Map 19). Representative specimens examined: FLORIDA. Ballast ground, Pensacola, Escambia County, 2 July 1897, Curtiss 5920 (MO, FLAS, NY, US); Apalachicola, ex herb. Chapman, no further data (MO), CUBA. Oriente Province. Baitiquiri 27 Dec. 1954, Alain £• Figueras 7 (OH); Daiquiri, 14-16 Mar, 1912, Britton & Cowell 12692 (F, NY); near Cajobabo, 12 Jan. 1956, Alain £• Morton 5015 (GH), Habana Province. Vedado, Feb. 1948, Clemente 5936 (NY). JAMAICA, St, Thomas, 3 July 1964, Powell & Green 1634 (IJ); St. Catherine, 4 Feb. 1953, Proctor 7607 (U). HAITI. Gonave island, Aug. 1927, Eyerdam 228 (F, GH, MO); near Hervee, 27 Feb. 1925, Ekman 3341 (NY); Gonaives, 24 Dec. 1927, Ekman 9453; vicinity Port-de-Pa ix, 9 Jan. 1929, Leonard & Leonard 11776 (GH) ; vicinity Port-de-Pa ix, 1 May 1929, Leonard & Leonard 15242 (NY), DOMINICAN REPUBLIC. Province of Barahona, I9IO, Fuertes 134 (NY), Fuertes 485 (F, GH, MO, NY), 1911 Fuertes 970b (GH) , Fuertes 992b (GH). PUERTO RICO. Paraquera, 24 Feb. 1924, Britton & Britton 8044 (GH, NY); Aguirre, 14 Feb, 1922, Britton, Ill Britton & Brown 6030 (F, NY); San Juan, 14 June-22 July 1901, Underwood & Griggs 913 (F, NY). LESSER ANTILLES. St. Thomas, 31 Jan. -4 Feb. I913, Britton, Britton & Shafer 5 (F, MO, NY); St. Croix, 17-25 Mar, I923, Britton, Britton & Kemp 132 (NY); Mar ie-Ga lante, 26 Mar. I936, Stehle 480 (NY); Martinique, k July I939, Egler 39-65 (NY); Martinique, 11 Jan. 1939, Stehle 3466 (GH) ; Martinique, April I903, Duss 4722 (F, NY); Barbados, Apr. -June 1895, Waby 94 (F) ; St. Lucia, 27 Nov. I96O, Proctor 2I638 (IJ); Cannuoan island, 26-31 Mar. 8-20 Apr. 1950, Howard IIII3 (FLAS, GH, IJ, NY); Grenada, 24 Feb. -6 Mar. 1950, Howard 10547 (GH, IJ). There seems no reason for the absence of this species from Florida but an intensive search in most parts of the state has failed to find any. The plants from the United States usually have brown or pale glands rather than the deep purple type found in the West Indies, but this is not considered significant. The slight tendency to enlargement of the nodes which occurs throughout the range is particulary pronounced in the plants which Urban named _E. crass i nod i s and _E. exci sa , and _E, exci sa also has a higher frequency of leaves with an emarginate apex than is common in the remainder of the range. Both species tend to be of a somewhat heavier texture than the average run of plants, but in spite of these differences, all specimens examined appear to fall within the range of variation expected from the species. The species is interesting for the marked development of the calyx, which forms a toothed and recurved three-lobed structure, much more prominent than in any other species examined. 17. CHAMAESYCE CENTUNCULOI DES (HBK.) Mi lisp.. Field Mus. Bot. 2: 408. 1916, Euphorbia centuncu loides HBK., Nov. Gen. et Sp. 2: 51. 1817. 1 12, Map 19. Distribution of C. seroen5 AS^-;- >-sa-^.. Map 20. Distribution of C, centuncu lo i des 113. Type: Prope Guanavacoa et portum Havanae, Cuba, (Herb. Mus. Paris, not seen). Fragments of collections by Poeppig "in maritimus Cubae" are In MO(i) and F(l) - the fragments are from Herb. Martius, Herb. Univ. Prague and Herb. Bernhardi, so the collection must have been widely distributed, and may have been seen by Kunth. There is also a fragment in MO(i) of a collection from Havana by Humboldt. These are regarded as supporting the use of the name which is maintained here, but their status as possible type material cannot be decided until Herb. Mus. Paris has been examined. Euphorbia bal bi s i i Boiss,, Cent. Euph., 11. i860. Placed here in synonymy on the basis of the description by Boissier in DC. Prod. 15(2): 38. 1862. Chamaesyce insulaesalis MiHsp., Field Mus. Bot. 2: 395. 191^. Type: Sandy places, Salt Key, Salt Key Bank, Bahamas, 21 May 1909, P. Wilson 8082 (Holotype: F, not seen: Isotypes: MO i, NY i). Euphorbia filicaulis Urban, Symb. Ant., 9: 217. 1924. Type: Cerro de Fraile prope Holguin, Oriente, Cuba, 28 Oct. 191^, E. L. Ekman 3237 (Holotype: Mus. Bot. Stockholm, not seen; Isotypes: K i, NY i, US 1). Chamaesyce f i 1 icaul is (Urb.) Alain, Contr. Ocas. Mus. Hist. Nat., Col.'de la Salle' , Habana II: 12. 1952. Euphorbia pachypoda Urban, Symb. Ant., 9: 216. 1924. Type: Prope Vedado, Habana, Cuba, 21 April 1914, E. L. Ekman 146 (Holotype: Mus. Bot. Stockholm, not seen; photograph of holotype, and Isotype: NY !). Chamaesyce pachypoda (Urb.) Alain, Contr. Ocas. Mus. Hist. Nat., Col.'de la Salle', Habana 11: 12. 1952. Perennial; prostrate forming mats to 2 dm. diameter. Stems many from crown of root, wiry, 0.3 mm. diameter, internodes to 1.5 cm.; 114. branching throughout length, sparsely at base, not rooting at nodes, glabrous, straw-colored or brown. Leaves membranous; blades elliptic, sometimes broadly so, to subcordate, 2-5 x 1-3 mm., base oblique, rounded to subcordate, margin entire or crenate in lower leaves of stem, apex rounded, midrib sometimes prominent on lower surface of leaf, glabrous, green; petiole ca. 0.3 mm. long; stipules joined, sometimes only at base, triangular to 0.2 mm., variously toothed or deep cleft. Cyathia solitary; peduncle to 0.5 mm., involucre broadly obconical, to 0.7 mm. diameter at mouth, lobes slightly exceeding glands, triangular, entire, glabrous on outside, densely pilose within, glands transversely elliptic to 0.2 mm. long, cupped, appendages as long as gland and twice as wide, margin entire or lobed, yellowish, fifth gland linear, short or obsolete, sinus shallow. Staminate flowers 8-20 per cyathium, andro- phores glabrous, to 0.5 mm. long at maturity. Gynophore glabrous, to 1.3 mm. long at maturity, exserted, upright or nutant; calyx vestigial; ovary glabrous; styles 0.2 mm. long, spreading, to 0.3 mm. long joined at base, bifid for 1/3 - 1/2 length, slightly clavate. Capsule glabrous, ovoid, 1.2 mm. long, 1.2 mm. wide between base and equator, roundly three-lobed, angles obtuse to acute. Seed triangular-ovoid, 0.8 mm. long, 0.5 mm. wide below equator, strongly four-angled, ventral angle somewhat obtuse, others acute, faces flat or slightly convex, obscurely wrinkled, brown or white. In sand and coastal rocks. Salt Key Bank and Salt Cay, New Providence, Bahamas, and Cuba (Map 20). Specimens seen: BAHAMAS. New Providence: Salt Cay, Feb. 1890, Northrop & Northrop 277 (F, GH, NY). CUBA. Camaguey: Cayo Paredon Grande, 15. ■/ *t.}>^ • L |mHimiHii|iiHmi liHi|mi|Hii|iiH|wi|iiii|miiiHi|iiii|)iM|thmtii{iiii|iiii|iMi|nii lll|llll|Mltlllll|IHI|llll|llll|ltll|llll|nM|llll|lltl|llll|llll|lllll i^iiiiiliiifiilSi ilililililihlililiil ^'•iiiiiiiiBiiiiiliiiiiiil^i' ' '■ ■ -..rvpf 01 Chamatsyca n fi«l Till'. It.Mi GARDEN lAMAS fO^i. WILSON, COLLECTOR U^ > « ^y A^i^> Plate 23. CHAMAESYCE CENTUNCULO I DES (HBK.) Mi lisp, Isotype: C. insulaesal is Millsp., Salt Key, Salt Key Bank, Bahamas, 21 May 1909, P. Wilson 8O82 (NY). lll|ljllll|llll|llll|IMI|lllilHH|IMI|IIH|HIYHt|)tWNI|IIHHtH|mi|Him l3tlllllllllllll!fllllllllllllll5llllfUitltlStlllllllll-* PlanU of Fiori-:^^'' Map 32. Distribution of _C. rnacu ia ta 168. Ponce to Penuelas, 22 Mar. I906, Britton & Cowel 1 I3O8 (F, NY); Yauco to Guayanilla, 14 June-22 July I9OI, Underwood & Griggs 602 (F, NY); 8 miles west of Ponce, 1 Dec. 1902, Heller 6164 (F, MO, NY). LESSER ANTILLES. Antigua, 1849, Wul 1 schlaegel 518 (MO); Guadeloupe, ex herb. Grisebach, (MO); Guadeloupe, Desirade, 12 Jan. 1936, Stehle 290 (NY). The species has clear affinities with _C. hi r ta and _C. opthalmi ca, but has a somewhat more upright habit, rounder leaves with merely crenulate margins, and usually smaller glomerules of cyathia. These are terminal, and for this reason the species is felt to be closer to _C. opthalmi ca than to _C. hi rta. 31. CHAMAESYCE MACULATA (L.) Small, Fl. SE. US., 713. 1903. Euphorbia maculata L., Sp. PI. ed. 1: 455. 1753. Type: Herb. Linn, sheet 630-1 1 i E_. supina Raf., Amer. Monthly Mag. 2: 119. I8I7. Type: Unknown, probably not extant. C. supina (Raf.) Moldenke, An annotated and classi- fied list of H. N. Moldenke's collection numbers from No. 1 to 11, 277 inclusive, 135. 1939. _C. tracyi Small, Fl. SE, US. 713. 1903. Type: Biloxi, Miss., 15 July 1894, Tracy 2913 (NY i). _C. mathews i i Small, Man. SE. Flora, 797. 1933. Type: Dunes opposite Miami, Florida, 26 Nov. -20 Dec. 1913, Small, J. K. £■ Small, G. J. 4556 (Holotype: NY !; Isotypes: DUKE i, FLAS !, FSU !, NCU '.) . Annual; prostrate to decumbent forming loose mats to 5 dm. diameter, Stem 1-2 mm. thick, internodes to 2 cm. or congested, branching through- out length, subd i chotomous near base, alternate above with short leafy laterals, not rooting at nodes, vi 1 lous-pubescent or tomentose or rarely 169. velutinous, on all parts of stem, or lower surface glabrate or rarely entirely glabrous, green or red. Leaves membranous; blades ovate- elliptic or somewhat oblong or linear, 5-15 x 2-5 mm., base inequilateral, rounded or obtuse, margins serrate, rarely subentire, apex rounded or obtuse, vi 1 lous-pubescent, often glabrate above, rarely completely glabrous, green or red, often with a red or purple spot in the middle of the upper surface; petioles 1- 1.5 mm. long; stipules distinct, linear, 0.7 - 1 mm. long, toothed or 2-3 parted. Cyathia solitary, appearing clustered when borne on short congested leafy laterals near the tip of the stem; peduncle 0.5 - 1 mm. long, cyathia obconical, 0.6 - 0.8 mm. diameter near mouth, lobes triangular, slightly exceeding glands, entire or minutely toothed, sparsely villous on outside, pilose within, glands transversely elliptic or lunate, 0.1 - 0,25 mm. long, appendages narrower than to twice as wide as gland, margin entire or lobed, white or pink, fifth gland linear, almost equalling glands, sinus deep. Staminate flowers rarely more than five per cyathium, androphores glab- rous, 1 mm. long at maturity. Gynophore pilose, occasionally glabrous, 1 - 1.5 mm. long at maturity, barely exserted and bent to lie deep in sinus; calyx a triangular pad of tissue; ovary strigose, rarely sub- glabrous; styles spreading, 0.2 - 0.4 mm. long, minutely joined at base, bifid for 1/3 - 1/2 length. Capsule strigose, often glabrate, ovoid, to 1.5 mm. long, 1.5 mm. wide below equator, strongly three-lobed, angles acute. Seed oblong-ovoid, 0.8 - 1 mm. long, 0.6 mm. wide below equator, strongly four-angled, angles subequal, faces flat or somewhat convex, obscurely transversely ridged or almost smooth, ridges sometimes passing into angles, tan, red-brown or ashen. 170, Plaota ui FloixU Plate 37. CHAMAESYCE MACULATA (L.) Small C. maculata (L.) Small, Charlotte Harbor, Charlotte County, Florida, ll Sept. 1964, Burch 4l8 (FLAS). 171 TYPE Chanaesyce MathewsH onall, SE ?!., 797, 1505. 1933. Louis c. (Theeler 19; Plate 38. CHAMAESYCE MACULATA (L.) Small Holotype- C. ma thews i i Small, sand dunes opposite Miami, Dade County, Florida, '26 Nov. -20 Dec. 1913, Small & Small 4556 (NY). 72. A common weedy plant of the United States. Found In disturbed habitats throughout Florida except on the Keys where _C. b lodgett i i replaces It as the characteristic plant of sidewalk cracks and gas station forecourts. Present in Bermuda but not in the Bahamas or any part of the Caribbean (Map 32). Representative specimens seen: FLORIDA. Alachua: University of -lorlda campus, Gainesville, 9 Oct. 1956, Jackson 702 (FLAS, FSU). Say: Gulf Resort Beach, 19 Oct. I963, Burch 213 (FLAS). Bradford: iampton, 29 July 1927, Wiegand and Manning I8I6 (GH). Brevard: Canova 3each, 17 April 1965, Burch 63O (FLAS); Okeechobee region, 6 Sept. 1903, -redholm 5990 (GH, NY). Broward: New River Sound, 18 Nov. 1903, Small r Carter 1 1 63 (NY); Deerfleld, 20 March I965, Lakela 28291 (FLAS, USF). :alhoun: Blountstown, 25 Oct. 1964, Burch 508 (FLAS). Charlotte: New ^olnt Comfort, 5 June 1964, Burch 351 (FLAS); Punta Gorda, 8 July 19^8, jarrett s.n. (FLAS). Citrus: Hernando, 18 May I965, Ward and Beckner t676 (FLAS); Lake Tsala Apopka, 8 June I96I, Godfrey S- Reinert 60884 ;FSU). Collier: Cape Romano, 28 Aug. 1922, Small, Small & DeWinkeler 10620 (NY); Naples, 6 June 1964, Burch 36? (FLAS); Marco Island, 26 Sept. 1964, Burch 405 (FLAS). Dade: Sand dunes opposite Miami, 26 Nov. -20 Dec. 1913, Small & Small 4553 (DUKE, FLAS, NY); Border of Everglades, 7 March 1892, Simpson 557 (GH); Biscayne Bay, 1874, Palmer 7404 (MO); Key B i s- ;ayne, 6 May 1958, Atwater M-42 (FLAS). DeSoto: Arcadia, 29 Nov. I962, yard & Burch 3217 (FLAS). Dixie: Shamrock, 24 Nov. 1964, Godfrey 65684 ;FLAS, FSU). Duval: Jacksonville, 11 October 1894, Curtiss 5118 (MO, JY); Jacksonville, 22 Dec. 1924, Small II56I (NY). Escambia: Pensacola, Jl July 1941, Brinker 356 (MO) . Flagler: Andulusia, 10 Oct. 1940, West & 173. Arnold s.n. (FLAS). Franklin: Lanark, 6 Oct. 1955, Godfrey 5^128 (DUKE, FSU, GH, NY). Gadsden: Chattahoochee, 13 Sept. 1956, Krai 6- Godfrey 355^ (FSU, GH) . Gilchrist: Trenton, 5 Oct. 19^0, West £■ Arnold s.n. (FLAS). Gulf: Cape Sand Bias, 8 Nov. 1959, Godfrey 59163 (FSU). Hamilton: White Springs, 26 July 19^6, West & Arnold ih (FLAS). Hardee: Wauchula, 26 Sept. 196^+, Burch 389 (FLAS). Hernando: Brooks- ville, 12 July 1958, Godfrey 57208i (FSU). Highlands: Sebring, 23 Apr. 19^8, Garrett 7 (FLAS); Junction US 27 & FLA 64, 2 January I963, Burch 60 (FLAS). Hillsborough: University of South Florida campus, Tampa, 13 Aug. 1964, Burch 192 (FLAS); 5 Nov. 1904, Fredholm 6469 (GH, MO, NY). Holmes: 9 miles E. of Walton County line, 25 Oct. 1964, Burch 494 (FLAS). Indian River: Vero Beach, 7 August 1963, Burch 115 (FLAS). Jackson: Marianna, 19 Oct. I963, Burch 211 (FLAS). Jefferson: Monticello, 4 Oct. 1964, Elam s.n. (FLAS); Capps, 9 Oct. 1954, Godrey & Morrill 52542 (FSU, GH). Lafayette: Dowling Park, 15 July I96I, Ramsey, Godfrey £■ Mitchell 247 (FSU). Lake: Eustis, I6-3O June 1894, Nash 1058 (GH, MO, NY). Lee: Alva, July-August I9OO, Hitchcock 328 (GH, MO, NY); Sanibel, outer island, 20 July 1954, Cooley 2330 (USF). Leon: Tallahassee, 30 June 1955, Godfrey 53572 (DUKE, GH, FSU, NY). Levy: Seahorse Key, 1 Dec. 1962, Ward 3256 (FLAS). Liberty: Jackson Bluff, 30 Sept. 1964, Godfrey 64677 (FLAS, FSU). Manatee: Longboat Key, 27 Sept. 1964, Burch 443 (FLAS); Bradenton, 20 Nov. 1964, Godfrey 65192 (FLAS, FSU). Marion: Lake Kerr, 24 Sept. 1941, West & Arnold s.n. (FLAS). Martin: Jupiter Island, 7 Aug. I963, Burch 126 (FLAS). Nassau: Fort Clinch State Park, 12 Oct. 1963, Burch 197 (FLAS). Okaloosa: Destin, 24 Oct. 1964, Burch 467 (FLAS). Okeechobee: Okeechobee, 27 Dec. 1964, Burch 588 (FLAS). 174. Orange: 6 Aug. 1902, Fredholm 5^5^ (GH, NY). Osceola: k miles E. of Polk County line on FLA 60, 7 Aug. I963, Burch IO6 (FLAS). Palm Beach: Jupiter Island, 27 July 1956, Cooley, West S- Daggy 4778 (GH, USF) ; Boca Raton Lake, 19 Nov. 1903, Small & Carter 1146 (NY). Pasco: Land o'Lakes, 10 July I958, Krai 7257 (FLAS, GH) . Pinellas: Sunshine Sky- way Bridge, St. Petersburg, 15 Oct. 1964, Burch 452 (FLAS); Fort DeSoto County Park, Mullet Key, 10 Sept. I963, Thorne, Long & Lakela 26325 (USF). Polk: Timberlane, Lake Wales, 1 Oct. 1964, Conard s.n. (FLAS). Putnam: Welaka, 12 July 1940, Laessle s.n. (FLAS). St. Johns: North River, St. Augustine, 12 Oct. I963, Burch 203 (FLAS). St. Lucie: South side Ft. Pierce, 7 Aug. 1963, Burch 124 (FLAS). Santa Rosa: Navarre, 24 Oct. 1964, Burch 477 (FLAS). Sarasota: Longboat Key, 21 Nov. 1964, Godfrey 65239 (FLAS, FSU). Sumter: Wildwood Exit from 1-75, 18 Nov. 1964, Burch & Ward 523 (FLAS). Suwannee: East of Ellaville, 15 July 1961, Ramsey, Godfrey &■ Mitchell 286 (FSU). Taylor: Adams Beach, 21 Oct. i960, Godfrey & Houk 60458 (FSU, GH) . Union: Worthington, 24 Aug. 1964, Warren s.n. (FLAS). Volusia: Green Mound, south of Daytona Beach, 23 Aug. 1922, Small, Small £■ DeWinkeler 10571 (GH) ; Daytona Beach Shores, 3 Aug. I962, Ray 11144 (USF). Wakulla: St. Marks Wild- life Refuge, 6 Oct. 1955, Godfrey & Krai 54104 (FSU, GH, USF). Wash- ington: Careyville, 25 Oct. 1964, Burch 498 (FLAS). Extra-territorial specimens: BERMUDA. Old Ferry Road, 9 Aug. 1913, Collins 217 (GH, NY); North Shore, 31 Aug. -20 Sept. 1905, Brown & Britton 12 (GH, NY). A very variable species in growth habit, color, pubescence and appearance of seed. The very similar Euphorbia humistrata, reported by Wheeler (1941) from Alabama, has not been found in Florida although 175, some collections are suggestive of this species in their pubescence and seed. Small's species, _C. t racy i and C_. ma thews i i are based on extreme forms of this species, and examination of a long series has shown a range of intermediates that span the differences, Wheeler's rejection (1939, I960) of the long-established name for this species has been mentioned in the commentary on _C, nutans. His case was never proved, and the traditional application of the epithet to this prostrate species should be maintained. The matter is discussed at some length in Burch (1965), which also gives a list of contributions to the controversy stirred up by Wheeler's proposal. 32. CHAMAESYCE THYMIFOLIA (L.) Millsp., Field Mus. Bot. 2: 412. 1916. Euphorbia thymifol ia L., Sp. PI. ed. 1: kSk, 1753. Type: not sheet 63O-IO in Herb. Linn. No specimen known to have been seen by Linnaeus has been found. Anisophyllum thymifol ium (L.) Haw., Syn. PI. Succ, 160. 1812. "_E. maculata L. (var. thymifol ia L.)" Griseb., Fl. Brit. W. I. Islands, 53. 1859., cited in this form. Annual; perhaps perennating by thick rootstock, prostrate, forming mats to k dm. diameter. Stem 1-2 mm. thick, internodes to 1.5 cm. long or congested; sparingly branched near base, and with short, congested laterals or unbranched at tips of stem, not rooting at nodes, vi 1 lous-pubescent or tomentose on upper surface, often glabrate, naked on under surface, green or light brown. Leaves membranous; blades oblong-elliptic, often narrow and very uniform on side shoots, 4-10 X 2-5 mm,, base oblique or subequ i latera 1 on side shoots, margin coarsely serrate, apex rounded to acute, upper surface usually glabrous, lower 176. sparsely tomentose, glabrate, green or yellowish; petioles 0.5 - 1 mm, long; stipules distinct, sometimes partly joined on underside of stem near tip, linear and toothed or 2-3 parted, 0.7 - 1 mm. long. Cyathia solitary or in pairs or even few-flowered glomerules at nodes by reduction of branches, sometimes appearing clustered on congested laterals; peduncle short, involucre obconical, O.k - 0.6 mm. diameter, lobes triangular, shorter than or equalling the glands, strigose out- side, glabrous inside, glands broadly elliptic or subcircular, 0.05 - 0.2 mm. long, pink or red, appendages small, rimming gland or to twice width, the pair nearest sinus sometimes extended in length toward sinus, pink, fifth gland absent, sinus extending almost depth of involucre. Staminate flowers rarely more than five per cyathium, androphores glab- rous, 1 mm. long. Gynophore strigose, ca. 0.5 mm. long, not exserted but forcing cyathium apart as it bends to push capsule through sinus; calyx obsolete; ovary strigose; styles upright, O.k - 0.6 mm. long, minutely joined at base, bifid for 1/3 length. Capsule strigose, long- ovoid, 0.8 - 1 mm. long, 1 mm. wide below equator, three-lobed, angles acute. Seed conical-ovoid, to 0.9 mm. long, 0.5 mm. wide below equator, strongly four-angled, faces concave, obscurely transversely ridged, ridges extending somewhat into angles, tan-colored. Present in three counties on the west coast of Florida. Not known from the Bahamas, and no specimens seen from Cuba, but a weed of waste places, often near salt water, through the remainder of the Antilles and in Central and South America (Map 3^). Representative specimens seen: FLORIDA. Charlotte: Charlotte Har- bour, 27 Sept. 1964, Burch 417 (BM, FLAS, GH, NY, US). Lee: Fort Myers, 177. Plate 39. CHAMAESYCE THYMIFOLIA (L.) Mi lisp. C. thymi fol ia (L.) Millsp,, Charlotte Harbor, Charlotte County, Florida, 27 Sept. \3Gk, Burch 417 (FLAS). 178. 13 Aug. 1963, Burch l86a (FLAS) ; Fort Myers, 27 Sept. 196^, Burch 4l3 (BM, F, FLAS, FSU, GH, NY, US). Pinellas: Dunedin, 15 Oct. 1964, Burch 451 (FLAS). JAMAICA. St. Mary: Green Castle, 5 July I963, Crosby, Hespenheide £• Anderson 476 (DUKE, PUR, UCWl); Sea Wall, 3 Sept. 1957, Robertson 3333 (UCWl). St. Andrew: Mona, 25 Mar. I96O, Adams 6598 (UCWl). DOMINICAN REPUBLIC. Peninsula de Samana, 28 Apr. 1930, Ekman HI4792 (A, F); Higuey, Seybo, 14 Apr. 1929, Ekman H12179 (PUR). PUERTO RICO. Catano, 1 Apr. 1930, Britton & Britton 9550 (NY); Mayaguez, 17 Oct. 1884, Sintenis 34b (GH, NY). LESSER ANTILLES. Guadeloupe, Desirade, 1893, Duss 2738 (NY); Dominica: Resale Valley, I903, Lloyd 739 (F); mouth of Pagoua River, 18 Apr. 1940, Hodge 5- Hodge 306I. Martinique: Ancien Riviera Blanche, 18 Feb. 1939, Stehle 3468 (A); Military Cemetery, St. Pierre, 1899, Duss 4056 (F, NY); Fort de France, Marigot, Aug. I89O, Duss 4455 (NY). St. Vincent: Byera, Charlotte Parish, 9 Mar. I962, Cooley 8479 (GH). Grenada: vicinity of St. Georges, 30 Oct. -11 Dec. 1957, Proctor 16824 (A, IJ); The Bower, St. Georges, 26 Dec. 1904, Broadway s.n. (F). It is not certain whether Linnaeus ever saw the plant to which his name _E. thymi fol ia is usually applied, since the sheet labelled "20 E. thymifolia" in the Linnaean Herbarium is not that species but C_. maculata. The descriptions to which he refers in synonymy are scarcely explicit enough to give a positive identification of the plant involved, but the application of the name is so uniform, at least in the New World, that it should be maintained unless it can be demonstrated that Linnaeus had some other intention. The species is very close to the group of species with greatly 179. Map 33. Distribution of _C. helwiqi i and _C. paredonens i s Map 34. Distribution of _C. thytnifol la 180. enlarged glandular-appendages in two pairs of unequal size. it differs from them in having very small glands, and in its much smaller appendages, which are usually insignificant even when one pair can be seen to be larger than the other. The capsule in _C, thymi fol ia is not exserted, but splits the cyathium as it enlarges. This is sometimes seen in other species, but not to the same degree as in _C. thymi fol ia where the cyathium finishes life as a fringe at the lower end of one side of the mature capsule. 33. CHAMAESYCE ADENOPTERA (Bertol.) Small, Fl. SE. US., 71^. 1903. Perennial; prostrate or decumbent, forming tufted mats to 2 dm. diameter, or more open, to 3 dm. Stem ca. 1 mm. diameter, internodes to 2 cm. long or much shorter in Florida plants; sparsely branched, mostly from upper part of stem, not rooting at nodes, strigose or rarely pilose on upper surface, glabrous below, straw-colored or darker. Leaves mem- branous to coriaceous; blades oblong-elliptic or reniform, 4-10 x 2-6 mm., base oblique, rounded or cordate, margin serrate, sometimes recurved, apex obtuse, glabrous or strigose on lower or both surfaces, green, often suffused purple; petiole ca. 1 mm. long; stipules separate or joined at base, attenuate, to 1 mm. long. Cyathia solitary at nodes, often collected on short laterals; peduncle short, involucre campanulate, to 0.6 mm. diameter at mouth, lobes scarcely equalling glands, deltoid, strigose on outside, ciliate within, glands transversely elliptic, cupped, to 0.5 mm. long, the pair flanking the sinus longer than the other, appendages prominent, the pair by sinus larger, to 2 mm. long and three times width of gland, margin entire or crenulate, white, fifth gland short 181 or obsolete, sinus deep. Staminate flowers 8-18 per cyathium, andro- phore glabrous, to 1 mm. long at maturity. Gynophore strigose, to 1,2 mm. long at maturity, exserted, strongly nutant, capsule almost hidden by appendages; calyx obsolete; ovary strigose; styles upright, 0,6 mm. long, joined at base, bifid for 1/3 length. Capsule strigose, globose-ovoid, base truncate, to 1,2 mm. long, 1.4 mm. wide just above base, angles rounded. Seed ovoid, 1 mm. long, 0.4 - 0.6 mm. wide below equator, angular or with angles obscure, faces flat with transverse ridges or broadly convex with short transverse grooves, dark red or wh i te. Key to subspecies of Z_, adenoptera 1, Stems few, sparingly branched, usually ca. 1 mm. diameter, often strongly decumbent; leaves usually 5-10 mm. long; seed angular, faces flat with transverse ridges a. ssp, adenoptera. 1. Stems several to many, often branching freely in upper part, rarely exceeding 0.5 mm. diameter, usually prostrate; leaves rarely reach- ing 5 mm. long; seed plump, angles rounded, obscure, faces marked with short transverse grooves 2. 2. Stems several, internodes short forming a compact plant; appendages of glands prominent, larger pair usually more than 1 mm. long b. ssp. perqamena. 2. Stems many, internodes often long, giving plant an open appearance; appendages of glands prominent but larger pair usually less than 1 mm. long c. ssp. qundlachi i. 182. 33a. C. ADENOPTERA (Bertol.) Small ssp. ADENOPTERA Euphorbia adenoptera Bertol., Misc. Bot., 3: 20, t. 23. 1843. Pinelands and dry rocky areas in the mountains of Hispaniola (Map 35). Representative specimens seen: HAITI. Hinche, Artibonite, 23 Sept. 1955, Proctor 10931 (j); Bassin Bleu, 14-27 April 1929, Leonard & Leonard 15010 (GH, NY); Fond Parisien, Etang Saumatre, 5-13 May 1920, Leonard 4092 (NY); Marmelade, 25 Aug. 1903, Nash 799 (F, NY); Morne des Commissa i res , 14 Sept. 1955, Proctor 10712 (IJ); Morne Rochelois, Miragoane, 17 Nov. 1926, Ekman H7242 (A, F) ; Port au Prince, 1-2 Apr. 1920, Leonard 3459 (NY); San Michel, 5 Aug. 1905, Nash £■ Taylor 1436 (F, NY). DOMINICAN REPUBLIC. Barahona: Trail between Pedernales and Aceitial, 8-12 Aug. 1946, Howard & Howard 8I36 (GH, NY); 1912, Fuertes 693 (F, GH, NY). Constanza, February I9IO, von Turckheim 2930 (F, GH, NY); Moncion, Monte Cristy, 9 June 1930, Valeur 92 (MO, NY); S. Jose, Santiago, 8 Apr. 1933, Valeur 970 (NY); Sabana de Santa Rosa, Santo Domingo, 11 Oct. 1947, Allard 15936 (MO, NY). This Is a stronger and much more diffuse plant than the other two subspecies. It is maintained at this level because some collections come close to ssp. pergamena in leaf shape and pubescence, but the seed differs so much that a good case could be made for separating it at the level of species. 33b. C. ADENOPTERA (Bertol.) Small ssp. PERGAMENA (Small) comb, nov. Euphorbia pergamena Small, Bull. Torr. Bot. Club 25: 615. I898. Type: Miami, November I878, A. P. Garber s.n.; Lemon City, 2 March I892, J. H. Simpson 523 (Syntypes: NY 1); duplicate collections Simpson 523: 183. F i, GH 1, NY 1, US I). Chamaesyce perqamena (Small) Small, Fl. SE. US., 713. 1903. Euphorbia lindeniana A. Rich, in Sagra, Hist, Cub., II: 197. 1850. Type: Cuba, 18^3-44, Linden 1706 (Herb. Mus. Paris, not seen; isotypes: F 1, NY i). Anisophyllum lindenianum Kl. & Gke., Tricocc., 33. 1859. Chamaesyce monensis Mi lisp.. Field Mus. Bot. 2: 389. 191^. Type: Limestone Plateau, Ubero, Mona Island, 20-26 Feb. 191^, Britton, Cowell £- Hess l84l (Holotype: F !; isotype: NY i). Crevices in limestone rock or in sand, usually at low altitudes, Dade and Monroe counties of southern Florida, Cuba, Hispaniola and Mona Island (Map 36). Representative specimens seen: FLORIDA. Dade: Campbell Drive, Homestead, 23 June I96O, Webster and Samuel 1009^ (DUKE, PUR); Arch Creek Prairie, 3 July I9I5, Small, Mosier & Small 6809 (DUKE, FLAS, NY); Lemon City, 30 July I9IO, Harper 83 (MO, NY); Miami, 17 March 1930, Moldenke 5827 (NY); Between Cocoanut Grove and Cutler, 31 Oct.- 4 Nov. 1903, Small & Carter 757 (NY); Long Pine island between Camp Jackson and Long Key, Everglades, 9 Jan. 1909, Small 5- Carter 3I89 (NY); Pinelands south of the Miami River, 20 Nov. 1912, Small 3851 (NY). Monroe: Big Pine Key, k Feb. 1952, Killip 41882 (F); Big Pine Key, 4 Sept. 1957, Brass 28985 (FLAS); Big Pine Key, 2 Dec. 1912, Small 3980 (NY). HAITI. Jean Rabel , 2 7 Jan.-9 Feb. 1929, Leonard & Leonard 12867 (NY). This subspecies is very close to the next, and is separated mostly because the Florida plants form such a homogeneous group. They differ on the size of appendages and in having a more compact growth \8k. habit than ssp. gundlachl i . _C. monens i s is known only from the type collection, and is included here until it can be shown that the lack of appendages on the glands is a constant character. 33c. C. ADENOPTERA (Bertol.) Small ssp. GUNDLACHII (Urban) comb, nov. Euphorbia qundlachii Urban, Symb. Ant., 5: 392. I9O8. Type: Cuba, 1865, Wright s.n. (Herb. Mus. Bot., Berlin, if extant). In sand or rocky places, often at the coast, Cuba (Map 37). Representative specimens seen: CUBA. Havana: Cojimar, 2k Aug. 1910, Britton, Earle & Gager 6281 (F, NY); Guanabo, August I9I6, Cazanas 340 (F, NY); Between Rio de Cojimar and Playa de Bacuranao, 26 Dec. I9IO, Wilson 9532 (F, NY). Isle of Pines: Caleta cocodrilos, 8 March I9I6, Britton, Wilson £■ Leon 15250 (F, NY); Pedernales Point, I6 Feb. 1899, Millspaugh 14-36 (F). PInar del Rio: Laguna jovero and vicinity, 5-7 Dec. 1911, Shafer 10840 (F, NY); Las Martinas to the coast, 19 Dec. I9II, Shafer 11093 (F, NY). Oriente: Baracoa, 26 Jan. 1915, Ekman 4436 (NY). Santa Clara: Castillo de Jagua, Sept. I9II, Cuesta 248 (F, NY); Cien- fuegos, Aug. 1913, Cuesta 746 (F, NY); Playa de Buenaventura, Bahia de Cochinos, 14 Aug. 1920, Leon & Loustalot 9547 (F, NY). The application of this name seems to be well-understood, and has been followed here although no type material has been seen. The usual appearance of the plant is very diffuse with many fine wiry stems, and long internodes holding the small leaves well apart. Other specimens approach ssp. pergamena in general appearance, but have much smaller appendages to the glands than is typically found In that taxon. These subspecies were combined as a single species, C. adenoptera , 185. )PTERA (Bertol.) Small var. PERGAMENA (Small) ined. Plate '.O. C. ADENOf p oerqamena Small, Miami, Florida, Nov. I878, Garber s.n. (NY) Syntype: E. £3^^ 186. i^-4.- r^ ilililililililililililililili Jll|llll|liil|ilil|iiii|illljnnpilt|iiii|iiiniiii|iMinnijiiH|iiii|Mn|mmi«m^ fflilllllllilillUhllllllllllJllllllllllllllRllllllllllllIll!! i i.iirvn or FiciA Nji.K'dt- 14,-j Ku to? ^ J»r. ' IME NEW YORK BOIANICAL CAKOt >. ' ' Wt-LuSATlOfi f.r »^p»Ti> tilt, Plate 41. C. ADENOPTERA (Bertol.) Small var. PERGAMENA (Small) ined. Isotype: C. monensis Mi lisp,, Mona Island, Porto Rico 20-?fi f^k low Britton, Cowell & Hess 18^+1 (NY). ' ^° ' '9"^, 187. J* <|ill|MMI|IMI|llll|ltll|l|ll|IMI|lltl|ltll|l'i' ' YORK BOTANICAL QAROCN ilniliiJiiiliiimi 1,1,1, i,l,iJ^,liiJ,i,uf^~'" Plate 42. C. ADENOPTERA (Bertol.) Small var, GUNDLACHII (Urban) ined. _C. adenoptera (Bertol.) Small, between Rio Coj imar and Playa de Bacuranao, Prov. of Havana, Cuba, 26 Dec. 1910, Wilson 9532 (NY). ^ \ Map 35. Distribution of C. ad enoptera ssp. adenoptera Map 36. Distribution of C. adenopt noptera ssp. pergamena 189. Map 37. Distribution of _C. adenoptera ssp. gundlachi Map 38. Distribution of C. conferta 190, by Millspaugh, Field Mus. Bot. 2: 388. 1914. In this he followed Boissier in DC. Prod. 15(2): 49. 1862., but differed in accepting _E. d ioica Kunth as a distinct species, while Boissier rejected even the name on the grounds that the plants were monoecious. Millspaugh's treatment was, perhaps, too sweeping in the combination of taxa, although the three separated as subspecies here are certainly too close to be considered distinct at the specific level. 34. CHAMAESYCE COiMFERTA Small, Fl. SE. US., 713. 1903. Type: Cocoanut Grove, Florida, 2 S- 5 Nov. 1901, J. K. Small & G. V. Nash s.n. (Lectotype: lower RH plant on sheet, NY 1; Isotypes: NY '. , F !). Euphorb ia conferta (Small) B. E. Smith, J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 62: 82. 1946. Annual or perennating; prostrate or decumbent, one to several stems from crown of root, to 2 dm. long. Stem to 1.5 mm. diameter, nodes to 1.5 cm. or congested; branched throughout length, upper laterals short and congested, villous on upper surface, naked below, red or rarely green. Leaves membranous, somewhat coriaceous; blades oblong-oblanceolate, 5-10 X 3-5 mm., base markedly oblique, margin serrate, somewhat thickened, apex acute to obtuse, sparsely pilose, quickly glabrate, red or rarely green; petiole 0.5 - 1 mm. long; stipules distinct or minutely joined at base, subulate, to 1 mm. long, sometimes toothed or slightly parted. Cyathia solitary at nodes of congested laterals in upper part of stem; peduncles short, involucre narrowly campanulate, 0.7 mm. diameter at mouth, lobes scarcely equalling glands, deltoid, strigose on outside, pilose within, glands transversely elliptic, to 0.3 mm. long, curved to follow rim of cyathium, cupped, dark red, appendages unequal, the pair near the sinus twice as wide as gland and elongated in length toward sinus concealing 191 the cyathium, the other pair to twice as wide as gland but not elongated, margin crenate, pink or red, rarely white, fifth gland obsolete or small, sinus deep. Staminate flowers 5-8 per cyathium, androphores glabrous, to 1 mm. long at maturity. Gynophore pilose, to 0.8 mm. long, bent and short exserted through sinus but not distorting cyathium; calyx a triangular pad of tissue; ovary strigose; styles upright to 0.6 mm. long, joined at base, bifid for 1/3 length; capsule strigose, conical or truncate-ovoid, 1.2 mm. long, 1.2 mm. wide above base, three-sided, angles obtuse. Seed ovoid, 1 mm. long, 0.^ - 0.6 mm. wide between base and equator, angular, faces flat or convex with transverse ridges, some- times very plump and faces grooved rather than ridged, red or white. Pinelands and oolitic limestone of Everglades Keys and lower Florida Keys (Map 38). Representative specimens seen: FLORIDA. Dade: Pinelands about Sykes Hammock, 4 Mar. 1915, Small, Mosier, £■ Small 5655 (DUKE, FLAS, GH, NY); Biscayne Bay, 19 June 1895, Curtiss 5^86 (FLAS, GH, MO, NY); Jenkins to Everglades, 10 Nov. 1903, Eaton 206 (F) ; Pinelands near Long Prairie, 2k Mar. 1904, Britton 211 (F, NY); Florida City, 23 Nov. 1964, Godfrey 65653 (FLAS, FSU); Long Pine Key, 9 Mar. 1956, Craighead s.n. (FLAS); Junction of Old Cutler Road and Red Road, 11 Aug. I963, Burch I56 (FLAS); Brickell Hammock, Feb. I9II, Small, Carter & Small 3277 (NY). Monroe: Big Pine Key, 25 Mar. -7 Apr. 1950, Killip £- Swallen kOkGj (BUS); Big Pine Key, 1 Sept. 195^, Thorne 15085 (U); Big Pine Key, 20 Nov. 1964, Burch & Ward 539 (FLAS). This taxon may prove to be referable to Chamaesyce dioica (HBK.) Mi lisp.. Field Mus. Bot. 2: 384. 1914. In making the combination 192. iJ0M 4^ A , < |niiMiii|iiii|nii|iiii|iiii|iniiirii|iiii|nii|iiiiimi|iiii|nii|iin|iiiiinn|iiim^ EVERGUDE KEYS *ORK aOTANICAt. OAnOih r^j ,a.^..-^^ Pla te i+3. CHAMAESYCE CONFERTA Smal Lectotype: C. conferta Small, Cocoanut Grove, Florida, 2 & 5 Nov. 1901 Small & Nash s.n, (NY). 193. Millspaugh gives the range of the species as Brazil to Colombia and through Central America to Lower California, and also cites a single collection from Santo Domingo. No authentic material of the species has been seen, but the description suggests that it has a strong morphological resemblance to the plants here carried under Small's name _C. conferta. and the possibility that the two are conspecific cannot be ignored. Some collections of _C. thymi fo1 ia come very close to this species, but can usually be distinguished by the marked splitting and distortion of the cyathium as their capsules enlarge, the smaller appendages to the glands, and the small glands which rarely show any of the cupping or enlargement to outline the rim of the cyathium that is found in _C. conferta. The phylogenetic relationship of the two species is a matter for conjecture, and an examination of _C. dioica and the other species of Central and South America discussed by Millspaugh (loc. cit.) might be illuminating in this respect. 35. CHAMAESYCE GARBERI (Engelm. ex Chapm.) Small, Fl. SE. US., 710. 1903. Euphorbia garberi Engelm. ex Chapm., Fl. Southern US. ed. 2, 646. 1883. Type: Coast of South Florida, undated, Garber (Lectotype: MO 1; Isotype: MO 1, F i). Chamaesyce adicioides Small, Fl. SE. US., 710. 1903. Type: E. of Bahia Honda, Monroe County, Florida, 20 Jan. 1920, J. H. Simpson 464 (Holotype: NY 1; Isotypes: F i US 1). Chamaesyce brachypoda Small, Fl. SE. US., 709. 1903. Type: Miami, Dade County, Florida, 4-7 Apr. I898, C. L. Pollard and G. N. Collins 244 (Holotype: NY 1; Isotype: US 1). 19^. Chamaesyce mosieri Small, Torreya 27: 93. 1927. Type: Pine- lands about Brogdon Hammock, Dade County, Florida, 19 June 1915, J. K. Small and C. A. Hosier 63^7 (Holotype: NY I). Annual or perennating; prostrate to strongly decumbent, forming mats to 4 dm. diameter. Stems few to several from root stock, to 2 mm. diameter, internodes to 3 cm. long or congested on laterals; branching throughout length with few, subequal branches near base and small con- gested laterals near tip, not rooting at nodes but occasionally acting as runners to form new plants, strigose to long-pilose, sometimes woolly and canescent, tan or purple-brown. Leaves membranous; blades ovate to oblong-elliptic, 4-9 x 3-6 mm., base inequilateral, obtuse or rounded, margin entire or rarely obscurely toothed near apex, apex rounded or obtuse, sometimes minutely apiculate, midrib sometimes prominent on under surface, strigose or long-pilose, sometimes glabrate, yellow-green or suffused with red or purple; petiole 0.5 to 1 mm. long; stipules joined, deeply bifid, toothed, to 0,6 mm. long. Cyathia solitary, collected on congested laterals; peduncle short, involucre campanulate, to 1 mm. diameter at mouth, lobes exceeding glands, deltoid, somewhat attenuate, entire or few-toothed, strigose, sometimes glabrate on outside, ciliate within, glands broadly transversely elliptic, 0.3 x 0.2 mm., appendages minute to approximately equalling glands, margin entire or crenulate, fifth gland obsolete, sinus narrow, to half depth of cyathium. Staminate flowers 8-20 per cyathium, androphores glabrous, to 0.8 mm. long at maturity. Gynophores glabrous, to 1.5 mm. long at maturity, exserted, upright or nutant; calyx a triangular pad of tissue; ovary strigose; styles spreading, to O.k mm. long, joined at base, bifid for half length. Capsule 195. strigose or pilose, broadly ovate, to 1,6 mm. long, 2.1 mm. wide below equator, broadly three-lobed, angles acute to obtuse. Seed oblong-ovoid, to 1.2 mm. long, 0.6 to 0.8 mm, wide between base and equator, four- angled, angles subequal, ventral faces slightly concave, smooth, dorsal faces flat or convex, obscurely wrinkled, red-brown or ashen. Restricted to pinelands and coastal sands of Dade and Monroe counties, Florida (Map 39). Representative specimens seen: FLORIDA. Dade: Pineland south of Miami River, 26 Nov. -20 Dec. 1913, Small and Small 4752 (NY); Between Miami and Kendall Station, 5 Nov. 1906, Small & Carter 2508 (NY); Between Homestead and Camp Jackson, 1 Nov. 1906, Small & Carter 2517 (NY). Monroe: Middle Cape Sable, 18 Apr. 1964, Burch 306 (BM, DUKE, E, F, FLAS, GH, IJ, MO, NCU, NSC, NY, PUR, UCWI , US, USF) ; Middle Cape, Cape Sable, 2 Apr. I960, Small 7687 (DUKE, FLAS, MO, NY); Upper Matecumbe Key, 26 Nov. 1912, Small 3900 (NY); No Name Key, 30 July 1895, Curtiss 5511 (F, GH, MO, NY); Long Key, 28 Feb. 1921, Hunnewell 7316 (GH); Grassy Key, 28-29 Jan. 1909, Small & Carter 3195 (F, NY); Vacca Keys, 28-29 Jan. 1909, Small & Carter 31^5 (F, NY); Big Pine Key, 27 Feb. I9II, Small, Carter and Small 3568 (NY); Summerland Key, 28 Feb. 1911, Small, Carter and Small 3591 (NY); Key West, 28-30 Mar. I906, Hitchcock s.n. (F) ; Boca Grande Key, Marquesas Group, 13 Mar. 1904, Lansing 2271 (F, NY). Chapman gives little help in typifying this species since his Flora gives no collector and only "Sandy coast. South Florida" as the locality. There are a number of collections extant which come from such an area. Curtiss distributed (#2479) a plant labelled "E. garberi, Chapm. n.sp. Sandy Field at Cape Sable, Florida". The date of distribution of 196. •;■' ■I.i.. <.:.rl,i,i, ';;:^:'l'''"'i"j'»wii"fNi|infjflnp(pii^ ^ ^ ^^-^^IF 8| » I c I! Uiiilihljhll Plate kk. CHAMAESYCE GARBERI (Engelm. ex Chapm.) Small 197. JHI|HII|IIM|llll|llll|llll|llll|IMI|IIM|llimilllllH|WljHHIHH|ini|IIM|ini{IMIIIIIIii;;lL ■^i| l«| I 31 Nl l»| l>| I7I ' H ^ 4| I i|d ' ill iS^UJilillllSlllliltllllillllilillUlilJSn., 12 1 n II ^ .'^ ■ ^A^ Plate i+5. CHAMAESYCE GARBERI (Engelm. ex Chapm.) Small Holotype- C. adicioides Small, E. of Bahia Honda, Monroe County, Florida, 20 Jan. 1920, Simpson U6i+ (NY), . i: cl.^etc t,i*... very 3!-.ort Ir.terr.odes: Inavesnucerous; Hades - ;•: or elliptic, nalnly 3-6 n.-i. lone, acute or acutish, entire, hir- "", r.ll.-htlv lne<]ullaceral, short-pstloled: Involucres approxlr^te ■ : rar.cMets, about 1 rea. hl^h, hirsute, the lobes deltoid; n-''*'"^- " t 0.5 nm. wide, the appendacen very nario-.i nndi rrecular : capsuleo "- . ~lde, hircute: seeds ovoid, 1 mt, lone, rediiish, t!^^art!>ier. obt-ise, tto races scarcely wrinkled. In plnelands, southern peninsular Florida. >• 6 i^^^y^^ -r/iy/T-^ t^< PLANTS OF SUBTROPICAL FLORID MMt^ bu. Cv Plate it6. CHAMAESYCE GARBERI (Engelm. ex Chapm.) Small Holotype: _C. brachypoda Small, Miami, Dade County, Florida, 4-7 Apr 1898, Pollard & Collins 2kk (NY). 199. '.L\? if|iin|iiiniiiipli|(i"|iiii|Hii|iiijiH^"iPfiTi"|"¥"|^ rrT^r.iii.i.i^.u.i.i.i.i.iVi.iii.ui.i, Plate 't?. CHAMAESYCE GARBERI (Engelm. ex Chapm.) Small intvoe- C mosieri Small, pinelands about Brogdon Hammock, Dade county^ FloridTTirJune 1915. Small & Mosier 6347 (NY). 200. this number has not yet been established, but he is known to have collected Cape Sable before 1880 (Rodgers, IS^). There is a sheet from Herb. Engelmann, now in MO, which may well be from this same collection although labelled only "Florida, A. H. Curtiss". This sheet is named _E. qarber i Engelm. ap Chapm. and dated I88O. There are sheets in F and MO (ex herb. Engelmann) collected on Cape Sable by Garber in October I878 (misread by Millspaugh as I888), and also an undated sheet by Garber from "Coast of South Florida" which was bought by MO as part of Chapman's herbarium. The name on this is _E. qarber i Engelm.. A comment on Garber's Cape Sable sheet "nowhere else seen" might indicate that these three were part of one collection. The presence of these plants in their private herbaria seems to indicate that both Chapman and Engelmann were familiar with this species, and that Chapman was given the name in correspondence probably on the basis of the Garber material. In any case, since Garber died in I88I his specimen was probably in Chapman's hands before this time and during the preparation of the supplementary list that constitutes the changes in second edition of the Flora. The description in the Flora was probably based at least in part on this specimen and it is possible that only the name should be credited to Engelmann. It is for this reason that author- ship will be cited in the form used. The same argument governs the choice of type specimen. Chapman is assumed to have used the specimen in his herbarium in writing the description, making this the obvious choice as lectotype. The specimen of Garber's in the possession of Engelmann is an isotype on the assumption that it is part of the same collection. The specimens distributed by Curtiss may never have been available to Chapman, and cannot be allowed any status as types. 201. Chamaesyce qarberi, as here delimited, shows a wide range of pubescence and branching characters. Examination of herbarium material and observations in the field do not support Small's separation of the group into three or four species, although his type specimens represent rather distinctive portions of the spectrum of variation. The name _E. qarberi was applied by Engelmann and Chapman to a plant from the coast of south Florida, and specimens that show the same characters have been collected at intervals from various dry areas behind the beach on Cape Sable at the southwestern extremity of the Everglades. The branching of these plants rarely goes beyond the production of laterals from the main branches, with the cyathia developed at the upper nodes of these, in contrast with specimens from other parts of south Florida where the laterals themselves often carry congested sideshoots on which most of the cyathia form. Pubescence on the plants from Cape Sable is of long, somewhat velutinous hairs, while in the plants recognized as _C, adicioides by Small the pubescence is short and more appressed. Small's C. brachypoda and _C. mosieri have straight pubescence even longer, stiffer, and more erect than that of the Cape Sable plants. This type of pubescence is almost confined to collections from the pinelands immediately south of Miami, but is occasionally found in plants from the Lower Keys. The close-appressed pubescence occurs on plants from all parts of the Keys and from pinelands south of Miami, together with plants whose pubescence falls between the three types described. Small's C. brachypoda and C. mosieri sometimes have a tendency towards a wiriness of stem, particularly when sprouting back after a fire, but plants occur which show grades of 202. Cy \«n Map 39. Distribution of _C. garberi Map ^0. Distribution of _C. turpini 203. heaviness of stem between this and the stouter, less brittle type which is more common on the Keys. The plants do not root at the node, but instances were noted on Cape Sable of stems acting as runners with the buried tips rooting to produce new plants. This has not been observed in any other species treated in this study. The type specimen of _C. adicioides appears to be a s i ngl e- stemmed, erect plant, but closer examination suggests that it may simply be a very old specimen of a decumbent plant, from which any other branches which were present have been lost. 36. CHAMAESYCE MULTINODIS (Urb.) Mi lisp.. Field Mus. Bot. 2: 410. 1916. Euphorbia mul tinodis Urban, Symb. Ant., 1: 34l. 1899. Type: prope Vieux-Fort, Guadeloupe, 1895, Duss 27^0 (Herb. Mus. Bot., Berlin, If extant; Isotypes: GH 1, NY i). Perennial; prostrate, forming mats to 15 cm. diameter. Stem to 1 mm. diameter, internodes to 1 cm. long; branched throughout length or mostly from upper part, not rooting at nodes, glabrous on lower surface, tomentose or short-pilose above, green or brown. Leaves membranous or of somewhat heavier texture; blades broadly ovate to orbicular 3-5 x 3-5 mm., base oblique, subcordate , margin obscurely serrate in upper half, apex blunt or emarginate, scattered long white hairs on both surfaces, green; petiole 0.5 - 1 mm. long; stipules joined, short 3 to 5-cleft, often longer on lower surface of stem and merely toothed, ciliate on surface toward stem. Cyathia solitary at upper nodes; peduncle to 0.5 mm. long, involucre campanulate, to 1 mm. diameter at mouth, lobes barely exceeding glands, deltoid, strigose on outside, ciliate within, glands transversely 20^+, jiijnM|iiii|nn|im[MjM[im|iiti|iiiiliin|im|iiii|iiiip •Vi^ulJSil.hliilaJWa^^ Symb. hntUI. / J4i. t9^~j Plate ^8. CHAMAESYCE MULTINODIS (Urb.) Millsp. Isotype: E. multinodis Urb., prope Vieux-Fort, Guadeloupe, 1895, Duss 27^0 (NY). 205. elliptic, 0.3 mm. long, dark and fleshy, appendages a crenulate rim or as wide as gland, light-colored, fifth gland linear, short, sinus shallow. Staminate flowers 5-16 per cyathium, androphore glabrous, 0.7 mm, long at maturity. Gynophore pilose, to 1 mm. long at maturity, exserted, nutant; calyx a triangular pad of tissue, to 0,6 mm, broad; ovary pilose; styles upright or spreading, 0.3 mm, long, joined at base, bifid for half length. Capsule sparsely pilose, ovoid, 1,6 mm, long, 1.8-2 mm. wide just below equator, broadly three-lobed, angles rounded. Seed oblong-ovoid, 1.1 mm, long, 0.6 mm. wide below equator, strongly four-angled, angles subequal, dorsal more acute than ventral, faces al- most flat or slightly sunken, obscurely wrinkled, chestnut brown. Known only from type locality on Guadeloupe, by type specimens, and by a collection from IJ (Vieux Fort, Basse-Terre, Guadeloupe, 30 Nov. 1959, Proctor 20204). The species is distinct from others encountered in the Caribbean, and has no obvious close affinities with them; but bears a general resemblance to _C. br i ttoni i , C_. cowe 1 1 i i and _C. centunculoi des. It will be carried under Urban's name unless it can be shown later that it is an introduction from some other area. 37. CHAMAESYCE MINUTULA (Boiss,) comb. nov. Euphorbia minutula Boissier in DC. Prod. 15(2): 1263. 1862, Type: Cuba, 1864-65, Wright 2013 (Herb, Conserv, et Jard, Bot,, Geneva, not seen; Isotype: GH i). The specimen examined has, in addition to Wright's standard label, a handwritten annotation "Euphorbia liliputiana. On rocks in river San Sebastian, Lagunillas, Jurisdiccion Pinar del Rio, Dec. 14" (punctuation added) . 206, Known only from collections by Wright (type and #3707) from the same locality in Pinar del Rio, Cuba. The glabrous, entire leaves separate these plants from depauperate specimens of _C. thymi fol ia or _C. adenoptera ssp, gund lachi i , and the stems pubescent on the upper surface, and the pubescent capsules distinguish between this and the glabrous _C. centunculoides. The species is accepted here, with some hesitation, on the basis of Wright's material. The name _E. 1 i 1 iput iana Wr. has not been validly published, it appears on the herbarium sheets, and is mentioned in a note by Urban (Symb. Ant., 1: 3^2. 1899), as a presumed synonym for _E. mi nutula Boiss., but has no standing beyond this. Perennial, ascending to 5 cm. Stems tufted, wiry, 0,3 mm, diameter, internodes to 5 mm. long; almost unbranched, tomentose on upper surface, glabrous below, brown. Leaves membranous; blades ovate, 2-3 x 1-2 mm., base oblique, rounded, margin entire or obscurely toothed, apex rounded, midrib sometimes prominent on lower surface, glabrous, green; petiole 0.3 mm. long; stipules joined, deltoid, toothed, 0.3 mm. long on upper nodes; peduncle 0.2 mm. long, involucre obconical, 0.6 mm, diameter at mouth, lobes equalling glands, deltoid, strigose on outside, ciliate within, glands transversely elliptic, 0.2 mm. long, appendages to twice as wide as gland and longer, pairs perhaps of unequal size, fifth gland linear, short, sinus deep. Staminate flowers ca. 5 per cyathium, androphores glabrous, to 0.5 mm. long at maturity. Gynophore glabrous, to 0.5 mm. long at maturity, scarcely exserted, bent through sinus; calyx obsolete, ovary strigose; styles spreading, 0.2 mm, long, joined at base, bifid at apex. Capsule not seen, described by Boissier as "adpresse hirtula". Seed not seen, "obsolete ruguloso". 207. 38. CHAMAESYCE TURPINll (Boiss.) Mi lisp.. Field Mus. Bot., 2: 412. 1916. Euphorbia turpinii Boissier, Cent. Euph. 12. i860. Type: in Ins. Santo Domingo, Turpin (Herb. Lenormand, not seen). _E. qarkeana Boiss. in DC. Prod. 15(2): 38. 1862. Type: In Santo Domingo, Schomb. 167 (Herb. Bot. Mus., Berlin, if extant). Chamae- syce qarkeana (Boiss.) Millsp., Field Mus. Bot., 2: 409. 1916. E_. portoricensis Urban, Symb. Ant., 1: 338. 1899. E^. portoricens is Urb. var. genuina Urb., loc. cit. 339. Type: in Portorico prope Ponce, prope Guanica, prope Salinas de Cabo-Rojo, et ad Los Morillos, Sintenis 635, 637, 3^59, 3492b, 4807 (Syntypes: Herb. Mus. Bot., Berlin, if ex- tant; duplicate coll., Sintenis 637, F !, NY 1; Sintenis 3492b, F !). _E. portoricensis Urb. var. albescens Urb., loc. cit. 399. Type: in Porto- rico prope Guanica, Sintenis 3439 (Herb. Mus. Bot., Berlin, if extant; isotype: F !, GH !). C_. portoricensis (Urb.) Millsp., Field Mus. Bot. 2: 394. 1914, C. albescens (Urb.) Millsp., Field Mus. Bot. 2: 408. 1916. Chamaesyce aneqadensis Mi 1 Isp. , Field Mus. Bot. 2: 394. 1914. Type: near settlement, Anegada, Dutch West indies, 19-20 Feb. 1913, N. L. Britton & W. C. Fishlock 998 (Holotype: F !; isotypes: GH i, MO i, NY !). Dry sites, often among rocks, at low altitudes, Cuba, Haiti, Puerto Rico and Anagada (Map 40) . Representative specimens seen: CUBA. Guantanamo, Oriente province, 24 Sept. 1914, Ekman 2901 (NY). HAITI. Les Gonaives, 24 Dec, 1927, Ekman H9455 (A); Passe David, May 1900, Buch 392 (iJ); Ennery, Artibonite, 13 Jan. 1926, Leonard 88O6 (NY). PUERTO RICO. Salinas de Cabo Rojo, 27 Feb. 1915, Britton, Cowell and Brown 4703 (F, GH, MO, NY); Los Morrillos, Cabo Rojo, 14 Feb. 1885, Sintenis 636 (A, F, GH, K, MO, NY); Guanica, 208, 5-18 Mar. I915, Britton, Cowell and Brown kS]k (F, NY); Guanica, 19 Sept. 1913, Stevens and Hess 303^ (F, NY); Guanica State Forest, 23 June 1962, Alain 9138 (IJ); Mona Island, 20-26 Feb. 1914, Britton, Cowell and Hess 1844 (F, NY); Punta Aguila, 27 Feb. I9I5, Britton, Coweil and Brown 4692 (F, NY). Perennial; erect or sprawling to 1 dm. Stems several to many from heavy rootstock, to 1 mm. diameter, internodes to 1 cm. long; branching from base and heavily in upper part of stem, sparsely or densely short-pilose on all surfaces, sometimes canescent at tips, brov;n. Leaves somewhat chartaceous or thickened; blades long-ovate or lanceolate, 2-6 X I-3 mm., base inequilateral, cordate to obtuse, margin entire, somewhat recurved, apex obtuse, midrib sometimes prominent on lower surface, both surfaces pilose or tomentose, sometimes sparsely so, some- times almost woolly-pubescent, green, often suffused red or gray; petiole 0.5 - 1 mm. long; stipules separate or joined at base, to 0.3 mm. long, toothed. Cyathia solitary at upper nodes; peduncle to 0.5 mm. long, involucre obconical, to 0.6 mm. diameter at mouth, lobes scarcely exceed- ing glands, deltoid, toothed, glabrous or sparsely pilose on outside, ciliate within, glands transversely elliptic, 0.1 mm. long, appendages obsolete to as wide as gland, fifth gland linear or obsolete, sinus shallow. Staminate flowers 5-12 per cyathium, androphores glabrous, to 0.8 mm. at maturity. Gynophore glabrous, to 1 mm. at maturity, exserted, nutant; calyx a triangular pad of tissue; ovary strigose; styles spread- ing, 0.3 mm. long, minutely joined at base, bifid for 1/2 - 2/3 length. Capsule broadly ovoid, base truncate, 1.2 mm. long, 1.8 mm. wide just above base, broadly three-lobed, angles obtuse. Seed ovoid, 0.8 - 1 mm. 209. 1 h iill|llil|lllllllll{llll|llli|ini|illl|ilii|lMl|illl|llll|lill|liii{iHi|nii|iiii|iiiiMi>iiiiii|iii|-<.f.i .,,. ,|. {;,ii<;|iH i\ < »\ ' »\ ' 4\ ' i ' »| ' 7\ ' ■! ' «1 ' iln n 12 ill n '^^t^lllilllllSlilljlUllliltUlttlLilliljSil.a 1'. MNTKMS: I'LOTAK IMMtTDKK I.NM.s. /..■r ■i/,..... ^-v Plate U9. CHAMAESYCE TURPINI I (Boiss.) Mi lisp. Duplicate Coll. of Syntype: E. portor i cens i s Urban. Salinas de Cabo-Rojo, Porto Rico, 17 Feb. 1885, Sintenis 637 (NY). 210. long, 0.5 mm. wide below equator, strongly four-angled, dorsal angles more prominent than others, faces flat or convex, sometimes slightly sunken, obscurely ridged, brown. The variation in degree of pubescence of this species was recognized by Urban in setting up the two varieties which he published. The range of material examined in the present study showed no point at which to make such a separation consistently, but confirmed that a wide range of pubescence states exists. No authentic material of _C. turp i n i i was seen, but specimens given this name by Urban appear to fall within the variation of his _E. portor i cens i s. There is an overall similarity between the plants given these names, and it seemed more reasonable to combine them as one species than to formulate diagnostic characters which would separate only the extremes of the range. 39. CHAMAESYCE PAREDONENSIS Mi lisp.. Field Mus. Bot. 2: 393. 191^. Type: Cayo Paredon Grande, Cuba, 25 Oct. 1909, J. A. Shafer 2763 (Holo- type: NY i, Isotype: F i). Perennial; prostrate forming dense mat to 2 dm. Stems wiry, many from crown of root, to 1 mm. diameter, internodes to 1 cm, long; branching throughout length, not rooting at nodes, tomentose, brown. Leaves mem- branous or slightly coriaceous; blades elliptic to obovate, 2-4 x 1.5 - 2.5 mm., base strongly inequilateral, rounded to cuneate, margin coarsely serrate, somewhat revolute, apex blunt, tomentose, green or reddish; petiole to 0.5 mm,; stipules joined at least at base, broadly triangular, margin toothed or lacerate, inner surface densely ciliate. Cyathia soli- tary at uppermost nodes; peduncle to 0.3 mm. long, involucre obconical, to 0.8 mm. diameter at mouth, lobes triangular, equalling glands, sparsely 211 pilose outside, densely ciliate within, glands transversely elliptic, 0.45 X 0.1 mm., dark brown, cupped, appendages longer than glands and to twice as wide, white, margin entire or somewhat crenate, fifth gland tiny or obsolete, sinus shallow. Staminate flowers rarely more than 8 per cyathium, sometimes absent, androphores glabrous, to 0.5 mm. long at maturity. Gynophores glabrous, to 1.5 mm. long at maturity, exserted, upright; calyx a triangular pad of tissue; ovary densely pilose; styles spreading, to 0.3 mni. long, joined at base, bifid for more than half length, somewhat clavate. Capsule sparsely pubescent, glabrate, ovoid, 1.3 mm. long, 1.6 mm, wide just above base, three-lobed, angles acute. Seed not seen, described by Millspaugh as "seed pink, farinose, ovoid- triangular, 1.2 X 0.8 mm., acute, the dorsal angle very sharp, the facets smooth, the two ventral about equal to one dorsal". Chamaesyce helwigii from Haiti, and this species are very similar, and, to judge by Millspaugh's description, share a very distinctive type of seed. The type specimens differ in several respects - stems of _C. helwi qi i fractionally stouter than those of _C. paredonens i s , leaves of the former ap i cu late- toothed near the apex and sparsely long-pilose while the latter has leaves with serrate edges which are sparsely tomen- tose, ciliate stipules are not as evident in _C. helwiq i i as in _C. paredon- ens is, and the appendages of the glands are less prominent. Only the type collections have been seen, and a wider range of material might indicate that these two taxa would be better considered one species, but, until further evidence Is available, they will be maintained under the separate names used here (Map 33). 212. ^7^.3 Plate 50. CHAMAESYCE PAREDONENSIS Mi lisp. Holotype: C. paredonensis Mi lisp., Cayo Paredon Grande, Camaquev fuh;, 25 Oct. 1909, Shafer 2763 (NY). ^ ^' ^' 213. 40. CHAMAESYCE PINETORUM Small, Bull. N.Y. Bot. Card., 3: 429. 1905. Type: Homestead trail between Cutler and Camp Longvlew, Dade County, Florida, 9-12 Nov. 1903, J. K. Small 6- J. J. Carter 836 (Holotype: NY i). Perennial from root stock to 5 mm. diameter; erect or decumbent to 10 cm. Stems wiry, to 0.5 mm. diameter, internodes to 2 cm. long; branching sparse throughout, vi 1 lous-hi rsute, tips canescent, dark brown. Leaves membranous or slightly thickened; blades reniform to ovate 2-5 X 2-k mm., base inequilateral, cordate to rounded, margin entire, somewhat revolute, apex obtuse or rounded, vi 1 lous-hi rsute, gray-green above, suffused red-brown below; petioles 1 mm. long; stipules distinct, to 0.3 mm., deltoid, sometimes deep-cleft, ciliate, light- colored. Cyathia solitary at upper nodes; peduncle to 1,5 mm., involucre campanulate to 1.3 mm. diameter at mouth, lobes triangular equalling glands, sparsely pilose on outside, densely hairy within, glands sub- circular, O.k by 0.3 mm., appendages a rim to slightly wider than glands, fifth gland triangular, short, sinus broad and shallow. Staminate flowers 8-14 per cyathium, androphores glabrous, to 0.5 mm. long at maturity. Gynophore sparsely pilose, to 1.5 mm. at maturity, exserted, upright; calyx a triangular pad of tissue; ovary strigose; styles spreading, to 0.4 mm. long, bifid for 1/2 length, minutely joined at base, obscurely clavate at tips. Capsule tomentose, reniform, to 1,5 mm. long, 2 mm, wide just above base, sharply three-lobed, angles acute. Seed ovoid, 0,8 mm. long, 0.5 - 0.6 mm. wide above base, strongly angled, ventral angle usually obscure, faces convex, obscurely wrinkled, red-brown. Found only in the pinelands on oolitic limestone of Dade County, Florida (Map 4l). 21^+. UAP EVERGLADE KEYS I I 12 1.1 M 1ft .III M W ViillK l»iT»Ml\l. I.»li|.l \ I '■'^Z, Plate 51. CHAMAESYCE PINETORUM Small Holotype: _C. pi netorum Small, between Cutler and Longview Camp, Florida 9-12 Nov. 1903, Small & Carter 836 (NY). 215. Map 41. Distribution of _C. pi netorum Map k2. Distribution of _C. del toidea ssp. serpyl 1 urn 216, Representative specimens seen: FLORIDA. Dade: Coral Gables, 25 June i960, Webster S- Williams 1015^ (DUKE, IJ); Everglades National Park on FLA 27, 11 Aug. I963, Burch I76 (FLAS) ; Florida City, 29 Nov. 1963, Burch 223 (FLAS); Hammer Key, Everglades, 12 May I9I8, Small 8605 (NY, US); Homestead, I8 Kay 195^, Killip 44241 (US); Long Key, Everglades, 18-26 Jan. 1909, Small & Carter 2930 (NY); near Long Prairie, 24 Mar. 1904, Britton 193 (NY); near Murden Hammock, 22 June 1915, Small, Hosier S- Small 6451 (FLAS, NY); pinelands about Sykes Hammock, 2 July 1915, Small, Hosier S- Small 676 1 (FLAS, NY). The strongly decumbent or ascending habit of this species together with its overall vi 1 lous-pubescence, distinguish it from the prostrate and glabrous or tomentose _C. del toidea. In most other respects the species are very close, but maintain their integrity although sym- patric over the whole range of _C. p i netorum. Some collections of _C. mos ier i (here placed under _C. garber i ) , perhaps even the type sheet, should be referred to this _C. p inetorum. 41. CHAMAESYCE DELTOIDEA (Engelm. ex Chapm.) Small, Fl. SE. US., 710. 1903. Perennial with swollen rootstock to 1.5 cm. diameter, 4 cm. long; prostrate forming dense mats to 3 dm. diameter. Stems many from crown of root, wiry, 0.3 - 0.6 mm. thick, internodes to 1 cm. long; sparingly or much branched throughout length, not rooting at nodes, glabrous to sparsely or densely tomentose, light or dark brown. Leaves membranous, somewhat thickened; blades reniform, orbicular or ovate, 2-4 x 1-4 mm., base inequilateral, cordate or subcordate, margins entire or rarely isolated leaves deeply and coarsely serrate, somewhat revolute or plane. 217. apex rounded to obtuse, glabrous to sparsely or densely tomentose, young leaves and stem tip sometimes canescent, yellowish-green or gray; petiole 0.5 - 1 mm. long; stipules joined 0,2 - 0.3 mm, long, subentire or several times parted almost to base, tine linear segments sometimes dark-colored. Cyathia solitary at tips of branches; peduncles 1 - 1.5 mm. long, involucre broadly campanulate, 1.5 mm. diameter, lobes triangular, equalling or slightly exceeding glands, pilose on outside, sometimes sparsely so or glabrous, densely hairy within, glands fleshy, yellow-green or occasionally drying black, transversely elliptic, 0.4 mm. long, 0,3 mm. wide, appendages obsolete or a rim to gland, fifth gland linear, shorter than lobes, sinus up to 1/3 depth of cyathium. Staminate flowers 8-14 per cyathium, androphores glabrous, to 1 mm. long at maturity. Gynophore glabrous, 1 mm. long at maturity, exserted, nutant; calyx a subcircular pad of tissue; ovary sparsely to densely strigose; styles up- right or spreading, 0.4 mm. long, joined at base, bifid for 1/3 length, somewhat flattened at tip; capsule pilose, glabrate, broadly deltoid or reniform, 1.2 mm. long, 1.5 mm, wide just above base, sharply and narrowly three-angled. Seed oblong-ovoid, 0.8 - 1 mm. long, 0.4 - 0.6 mm. wide below base, three angles prominent, obtuse, ventral angle rounded, faces convex, plump, obscurely wrinkled, brown or deep red-brown. Key to subspecies of _C. del toidea 1. Plants forming mats, but becoming diffuse with age; leaves much longer than wide a, ssp, serpyl lum. 1, Plants maintaining tight mat form with age; leaves about as long as wide ^- ^^P* del toidea. 218. 4la. CHAMAESYCE DELTOIDEA (Engelm. ex Chapm.) Small ssp. SERPYLLUM (Small) comb, no v. Chamaesyce serpyllum Small, Fl. Florida Keys, 8l. 1913. Type: Big Pine Key, Monroe County, Florida, 17 Nov. 1912, J. K. Small 3811 (Holotype: NY '.) . Found only in pinelands on oolitic limestone on Big Pine Key, Monroe County Florida (Map 42). Representative specimens seen: FLORIDA. Monroe: Pinelands, Big Pine Key, 17 Dec. 1913, Small & Small 5027 (DUKE, FLAS, NY); PInewoods, Big Pine Key, 30 Jan. -4 Feb. 1940, Martin I368 (DUKE, NY); near Watson Hammock, Big Pine Key, 1 Sept. 1954, Thorne 15011 (IJ); Big Pine Key, 10 Dec. 1921, Small, Small & Matthews IOI96 (NY); Big Pine Key, 4 Sept. 1957, Brass 28978 (FLAS); bridge over Pine Channel, Big Pine Key, 10 Aug. 1963, Burch 139 (FLAS). The diffuse habit distinguishes this from the other subspecies, which also has much broader leaves on young parts of the stems. The seed of this subspecies is usually somewhat plumper, and sometimes longer, than that of ssp. del to idea. 4lb. CHAMAESYCE DELTOIDEA (Engelm. ex Chapm.) Small ssp. DELTOIDEA Key to varieties of ssp. del to idea 1. Stems and leaves glabrous or with a few tiny hairs on underside of 'eaves 1^ var. deltoidea. 1. All parts of plant tomentose, often densely so, and young shoots canescent II. var. adhaerens. 4lb. 1. CHAMAESYCE DELTOIDEA (Engelm. ex Chapm.) Small ssp. DELTOIDEA var. DELTOIDEA Euphorbia deltoidea Engelm. ex Chapm., Fl. Southern U.S. ed. 2: 647. I883. Type: Biscayne Bay, Florida, June, Curtiss 2474 219. .'? 4 •^|X|"t;i'"'i"^""iT"'"r«; ^ ' i lL!lhli!J3iJ:il!JuJW.i.i::S:... _ ''■ Plate 52. CHAMAESYCE DELTOIDEA (Engelm, ex Chapm.) Small ssp. SERPYLLUM (Small) ined. Holotype: £. serpyl 1 um Small, Big Pine Key, Monroe County, Florida, 17 Nov. 1912, Smal 1 381 1 (NY) . 220, (Lectotype: MO i; Isotypes: F '. , NY !). _C. del to idea (Engelm. ex Chapm.) Smal 1 , Fl. SE. US., 710. 1903. Locally frequent on oolitic limestone of pinelands and Everglades Keys of Dade County, Florida (Map 43). Representative specimens seen: FLORIDA. Dade: Pinelands south of the Miami River, 20 Nov. 1912, Small 3850 (NY); rocky pine woods near Miami, 11 July 1895, Curtiss 5468 (F, FLAS, GH, MO, NY); Miami, 13 May 1904, Tracy 9114 (F, MO, NY); Buena Vista, 26 Dec. 1929, Moldenke 291 (MO, NY); Miami, 28 Oct. -28 Nov. 1903, Small £■ Carter 520 (F, NY); Perrine, 23 Mar. 1904, Britton 145 (F, NY); between Cocoanut Grove and Cutler, 31 Oct. -4 Nov. 1903, Small £■ Carter 755 (F, NY); N.E. of Perrine, 7 June 1964, Burch 376 (FLAS). Often found growing with the next variety and resembling it closely in all features except its pubescence and rather more compact growth habit, 41b. 11. CHAMAESYCE DELTOIDEA (Engelm. ex Chapm.) Small ssp. DELTOIDEA var. ADHAERENS (Small) comb. nov. Chamaesyce adhaerens Small, Torreya 27: 104. 1927. Type: Pinelands between Peter's Prairie and Homestead, Florida, 10 Nov. 190&, J. K. Small & J, J. Carter 2531 (Holo- type: NY i). Locally frequent on oolitic limestone of pinelands and Everglades Keys of Dade County, Florida (Map 44). Representative specimens seen: FLORIDA. Dade: 2 miles south of Florida City, 30 Aug. 1954, Thorne 14868 (IJ); north of Goulds, 10 Aug. 1963, Burch l44a (FLAS); Homestead, 22 Nov. 1964, Godfrey 65587 (FLAS, FSU); Naranja, 23 June I96O, Webster £■ Williams 10107 (PUR); between 221 pg i|iiii{iiii{ini|nii|nii|iiii|iiu|iiiiiiiii|ini{iiii|nn|ini|iin|iiiiiiiii|ini|iin|iin|iiii|iiii|iiii|iiii|nii|i iiniiiii|iiii|iiii|iiii|nii|iiiii InililililJililffililiLlilihl^JthlilililJ^ilililililililffilililil^ ilililililihl deft r. .t,^c ^.U) / BOTAr -«. t ,*j c^ a^ Plate 5h. CHAMAESYCE DELTOIDEA (Engelm. ex Chapm ) Small ssp. DELTOIDEA van. ADHAERENS (Small) ined. Holotype: C. adhaerens Small, Pinelands between Peter's Pralr;« ^ Homestead, Florida, 10 Nov. I9O6, Small s Carter 253I (NY) '"' Map 43. Distribution of _C. del to idea ssp. del toidea var. deltoide Map kk. Distribution of C. del toidea ssp. deltoidea var. adhaerens 224, Peter's Prairie and Homestead, 10 Nov. 1906, Small & Carter 2530 (NY); near Shields Hammock, 10 July 1915, Small, Hosier 5- Small 6948 (DUKE, NY). Between Homestead and Naranja, 29 Nov, I963, Burch 226 (FLAS). Tine type specimens of tlnese two varieties represent the two ex- tremes of pubescence, and could stand convincingly as the types of two distinct species. Examination of a long series of collections, however, has shown a range of intermediates, and it is more consistent with obser- vations of pubescence difference within other species of the genus to consider the presence or absence of hairs as no more than a varietal character! sti c. Chapman refers only to Curtiss as the collector of this species, but his collection (#2474) has been generally accepted as the type. The sheet in Missouri Botanical Garden is designated lectotype because it is from Engelmann's herbarium, and because no other sheet seen is in better condition or seems to have any stronger claim to be selected. Merrill (1948) discusses the pagination and dates of publication of Chapman's Flora. Author citation is made in this form since there is no reason to suppose that Engelmann supplied more than the name to Chapman. This species has a strong resemblance to _C. turp Ini I , C_. paredonen- sis, and _C. helwigl i of the Greater Antilles, but differs in having fleshy glands with appendages much reduced, and In the del toi d-reni form capsule with three narrow lobes. 42. CHAMAESYCE TUMISTYLA sp. nov. Type: aviation field north of city. Mole St. Nicholas, Haiti, 13-19 Feb. 1929, E. C. S- G. M. Leonard 13146 (Holotype: NY i; isotype: GH I), 225. Annual or perennating; prostrate, forming mats to 2 dm. diameter. Stem to 0.5 mm. diameter, internodes to 5 mm. long; branched freely in upper part, rooting at nodes, nodes thickened, sparsely strlgose on upper surface, glabrous beneath, light-colored. Leaves membranous, somewhat thickened; blades ovate-orbicular, 2-3 x 2-3 mm., base oblique, rounded or obtuse, margin entire or somewhat erose in drying, apex rounded, glabrous, green; petiole 0.3 mm. long; stipules joined at base, sheathing parted into linear segments 0.1 mm. long. Cyathia solitary at upper nodes; sessile or minutely peduncled, broadly campanulate, to 0.6 mm. diameter at mouth, lobes scarcely equalling glands, deltoid, glabrous on outside, sparsely hairy within, glands transversely elliptic, fleshy, 0.3 mm. long, appendages obsolete, fifth gland short, deltoid, sinus shallow. Staminate flowers 5-12 per cyathium, androphores glab- rous, to 0.4 mm. long at maturity. Gynophore glabrous, to 1.2 mm. long at maturity, exserted, upright; calyx obsolete or a rim of tissue; ovary glabrous; styles upright or spreading, 0.3 mm. long, joined at base, swollen at apex, undivided. Capsule glabrous, broadly ovoid, 0.6 mm. long, 0.7 mm, wide below equator, broadly three-lobed, angles rounded. Seed ovoid, 0.4 mm. long, 0.2 mm. wide below equator, four-angled, ventral angle sometimes obscure, others rounded, faces convex, plump, smooth, dark tan. Known only from the type collection, Haiti. There are marked differences between this tiny plant and any other species examined. The prostrate habit with stems rooting at the enlarged nodes is reminiscent of C. serpens , but the stems are tomentose on one surface, and are threadlike and much more slender than those of that 226. glabrous species. The stipules differ, too, in being somewhat sheathing and yellow, rather than simply fused in pairs and white. The subsessile cyathium has not been seen elsev^here, but the most distinctive feature is the undivided style, sv^ollen for the upper thi rd of i ts length. This is considered to be a distinct species on the basis of these characters, and will be published as such under an appropriate name. The epithet "tumistyla" (which is used here for purposes of identification within the work, and not in any sense as an attempt at publication) refers to the enlarged apical portion of the undivided style and stigma. 43. CHAMAESYCE LEONARDll sp. nov. Type: bluff east of Bord de Mer, vicinity of Jean Rabel , Haiti, 27 Jan. -9 Feb. 1929, E. C. S- G. M. Leonard 12888 (Holotype: NY i; isotypes: GH !, K i). Annual; prostrate, fruiting when stems 2-3 cm. long. Stem to 0.5 mm. diameter at base, internodes to 5 mm.; branches reduced to groups of cyathia, not rooting at nodes, tomentose on all surfaces, greenish-yellow suffused purple. Leaves membranous or of a heavier tex- ture; blades ovate-elliptic, 5-8 x 2.5-^, base oblique, subcordate or rounded, margin obscurely serrated, thickened, apex obtuse, midrib prominent on lower surface, both surfaces strigose or sparsely tomen- tose, upper surface glabrate, lower surface minutely papillose, green suffused purple; petiole ca. 1 mm. long; stipules joined at base, 0.3 mm. long, deeply bifid, strigose. Cyathia in leafless clusters of 2-5 at nodes; peduncle 0.3 mm. long, involucre obconical, to 0,6 mm. diameter at mouth, lobes equalling glands, deltoid, strigose on outside, densely ciliate within, glands transversely elliptic, 0.05 mm. long, somev/hat 227. stipitate, appendages obsolete, fifth gland short, deltoid, sinus broad, shallow. Stamlnate flowers 3-10 per cyathia, androphores glabrous, to 0.6 mm, long at maturity. Gynophore strigose, to 1 mm, long at maturity, exserted, upright or nutant; calyx a triangular pad of tissue; ovary densely whi te-str igose; styles spreading, 0.4 mm. long, joined at base, bifid for half to two-thirds length. Capsule densely whi te-strl gose, broadly ovoid, 1 mm. long, 1.2 mm. wide at equator, broadly three-lobed, angles rounded. Seed ovoid, 0.7 mm. long, 0.4 mm, wide, strongly angled, ventral angle rounded, faces convex, strongly wrinkled, red-brown or ashen, angles often lighter. Known only from type collection, Haiti, The cyathia of this species are borne in a manner not encountered in other species examined. The laterals near the tip of the stem are given over entirely to cyathia production, and consist of a group of one to a few cyathia congested on a stem' a few m i 1 1 imeters long. This probably represents an extreme reduction of the type shown by _C. maculata or _C. thymi fol ia, in which cyathia are formed on congested leafy laterals in the upper part of the stem, rather than a further reduction from the glomerules of _C. berter iana or _C. hi rta, since close observation shows that these cyathia alternate on the short stems, while in glomerules they fall at the nodes of a dichasium. The white, stri gose-pubescence of the capsules and the prominent midrib below the purple-flushed leaves are further distinctive features of the plant, and the wrinkled seed is also unusual. The epithet "leonardii' in honor of the very active collector of the Haitian flora, will be used here for identification, and not in an attempt to publish the name. 228. No close affinities a.-nong species of tiie area are apparent for this species, but more mature plants may show features which suggest possible relationships. DOUBTFUL SPECIES CHAMAESYCE GYMNADENIA (Urb.) Mi lisp.. Field Mus. Bot. 2: 409. 1916. Euphorbia gymnadenia Urban, Symb. Ant., 5: 390. I9O8. Type: Cuba, Wright 3706 (Herb. Mus. Bot., Berlin, if extant; Isotypes: GH :). The sheet from GH which was seen holds three plants; one is _C, qund 1 ach i i , and the other two are referrable to _C. mi nutul a as under- stood here. Urban makes comparisons with these two species in his notes, but the points of difference are not apparent on the specimens. The name will probably fall into the synonymy of one of these two species, but, until the original material has been seen, cannot be assigned to either one with confidence. CHAMAESYCE INFLEXA (Urb. & Ekm.) comb. nov. Euphorbia inflexa Urban & Ekman, Arkiv. Bot., Stockh. 22A (8): 64. 1929. Type: Pineland toward Peu-de-Temps , Morne Vi ncent ,Gaul thier , Massif de la Selle, Haiti, 3 Mar. 1927, E. L. Ekman H7764 (Holotype: Herb. Naturhistor i ska Riksmuseum, Stockholm, not seen; Isotype: K i). No fruiting material of this species has been seen. The vegetative plants seen at K were suggestive of the Cuban species _C. camaqueyens is, but cyathial characters must be checked before any decision on the dis- tinctness of the species can be made. CHAMAESYCE URBANl! Millsp., Field Mus. Bot. 2: 412. I9I6. Euphorbia vi 1 losula Urban, Symb. Ant., 1: 340. 1899. Type: in Ste. Domingo, prope Tamboril, May, Eggers 1944c (Herb. Mus. Bot., Berlin, if extant), non 229. 230. E. vj] losula Pax, Bot. Jahrb. 19: 118. 189^. Urban's comment on the species compares it with E. turp i n I i , but the name seems to have been used for plants which resemble _C. adenoptera, perhaps because the description mentions that the glands are not all the same size. Since no authentic material has been seen the position of this species cannot be decided with confidence. PHYLOGENY The relationships within Euphorbi a sensu lato are far from clear. No study of the genus at the specific level has been completed since that of Boissier in 1862, and the treatments of the tribe Euphorb ieae by Pax (18S0) and Pax and Hoffman (1931) in Die N'aturlichen Pflanzen- fami 1 ien, and of the family by Scholz (1964) in the Syl labus , are limited by the format laid down by Engler and Prantl when they originated these works. The study by Haber (1925) of the anatomy of the cyathium did not provide much basis for speculation on the relationship of the divisions proposed by various authors, although she suggests that there are con- siderable differences between species in the degree of specialization shown, A similar pattern of demonstrating the possible utility of characters without drawing phylogenetic conclusions exists in the chromo- some studies by Perry (19^3) and the work on electrophoresis of latex by Moyer (193^). It was disappointing to find that Punt (I962) could give so little indication of possible phylogenetic paths within the genus Euphorb la in view of some of the remarkable results obtained from pollen studies in the rest of the family and many other parts of the plant ki ngdom. Wheeler (19^0 has correlated the type of branching described by Crolzat (1936b, 1937) for the genus Chamaesyce with the suggestions for the origin of the group first made by Roeper in 1824. He feels that the development of branches from the crown of the stem after the abortion of 231. 232. the main axis in Chamaesyce is parallel with the formation of a pleiochasium in Euphorbi a subgenus Esula Pers. after the main axis has produced a terminal cyathium. The stems of Chamaesyce would, then, be homologous to the rays of subgenus Esula which are usually d ichotomous ly branched. This explanation is in accord with Croizat's description of the growth of the stems in Chamaesyce by successive production of nodes terminating in a bud or cyathium, and with extension beyond this by the development of laterals. A pleiochasial development similar to that in subgenus Esula is shown by some members of Euphorbia subgenus Aqaloma. Both groups have alternate leaves on the main axis but opposite leaves on the rays, and it is suggested that Chamaesyce has developed from one or the other by the reduction of this main axis to one or two nodes. This is illustra- ted in Figures 1 and 2 of the series of diagrams (adapted in part from Wheeler) in Plate 55. This origin for Chamaesyce seems entirely reasonable, and implies that dichotomous branching is a primitive characteristic within the genus. Dichotomous branching for the full length of the stems (secondary axes) is rare in the species under consideration, but many show a tendency toward dichotomy at the tips of the branches and apparently lateral branching in the lower parts of the stem. This transition is illustrated in Figure 3. The lateral branching comes about by the unequal development of the lateral buds at each node, and in most cases the partial suppression of one lateral alternates up the stem. This type of branching Is found in most of the upright, large-leaved species such as _C. hyssop i fol ia and _C. hyper i ci fol ia. 233. The production of cyathia is usually confined to the upper parts of the stem, and the solitary cyathium is terminal at each node, although a lateral may extend the axis so that it appears to be lateral. In some species such as C_. hyssopifol ia. production is concentrated on the partially suppressed member of the pair of laterals, which develops into a compound dichasium bearing many cyathia. Condensation of the internodes of the dichasium, and reduction or loss of leaves gives rise to the glomerulate grouping of cyathia in _C. hyper i ci fol i a and to the tight glomerules of C_. hi rta and similar species (Figures k and 5). in many of the prostrate species, such as _C. maculata, there is very little tendency to dichotomy in any part of the stem, and there is apparently a normal alternate lateral branching system. This represents an extreme suppression of one or other lateral, which then shows the same suppression in its own branching. Reduction of internodes in these laterals gives rise to the congested production of cyathia which is often seen at the upper nodes of these species (Figure 6). Two paths can thus be traced in the evolution of branching pattern in the group of species under consideration. Dichotomous branching appears to be the primitive condition, and, in almost all cases, has given way to unequal development of the two branches of the dichotomy. In one series the partially suppressed branch has retained its dichotomous tendency, and the cyathia are carried in compound dichasia, which, by uniform reduc- tion of internodes, have given rise to tight glomerules. The second series Involves a continuation of the suppression of one of the branches of the dichotomy into the branching of these sideshoots themselves. Reduction of the internodes of these shoots has given the congested branchlets on which 23^. Fig. 1 Plate 55. EVOLUTION OF BRANCHING PATTERN IN CHAMAESYCE 235, most of the cyathia are developed in many species. These are usually leafy, but further reduction in _C. 1 eonard i i has resulted in the produc- tion of small groups of cyathia on a leafless axis. There is no evidence to suggest that reduction in either of these series has proceeded to the point at which there has been much loss in the number of cyathia, and in particular it seems safe to assume that the production of a single terminal cyathium at a node is a primitive rather than a derived condition. No other characters in the genus show transitions which are as easily recognizable as are those in the branching and the position of cyathia production. Croizat pointed out, while describing the abortion of the primary axis which characterizes the genus, that the ability to produce buds at this aborted apex, or for them to be held back by factors of the environ- ment, makes the plant very efficient under adverse conditions. Many species grow very slowly under drought or an unfavorable temperature regime, but produce heavy growth and abundant seed when conditions im- prove for even a short period. This must have represented a selective advantage over plants which had to produce a large basic branch system before forming cyathia, such as those of Euphorbia subgenus Esula. An aborted primary axis from which grow many fruiting branches, homologous to the rays of subgenus Esula, is taken to be the primitive state in Chamaesyce. Once this character was established, evolution was probably from a small to a much enlarged root in the unfavorable habitats in which the appropriate selection pressure was present, and this type of root, and the associated long life-span, are probably derived characters, 236. The situation is not clear-cut, however, since in less stringent environments it is unlikely that the same pattern of development would have occurred. The maximum seed production under uniformly favorable conditions would come from steady growth and fruiting, and in this case a single- or few-stemmed plant might be derived from the basic type in which many stems grow from the crown of the root. The shrub habit is probably also derived, and represents another response to environment, perhaps in species in which the ability to produce multiple stems from ground level had already been lost. Pubescence is widespread in the family Euphorb iaceae, often with complex stellate or branched hairs. it is not common in the groups close to Chamaesyce, but presumably represents a primitive condition. All pubescence in the genus is of simple hairs, although most are multicelled, and in some cases are large and heavily pigmented. Most characters of the inflorescence are rather stable in the genus. The perianth of the female flower is reduced to a vestigial calyx represented by a pad of tissue and in only one species, _C, serpens, do the three lobes develop to about 0.3 fTini. long, and recurve. it would be necessary to examine the vascular traces to decide if this is more than a casual elaboration of tissue. The number of male flowers varies greatly from species to species, and Haber (1925) traced a series through Euphorbia sensu lato in which the numbers in each fascicle in the cyathium were reduced, from the primitive state with many present, by loss of terminal and lateral flowers in various combinations. The examples that she gives from Chamaesyce fall throughout the series. 237. The same is true of the elaboration or reduction of the bracts which subtend the male flowers in their inflorescences inside the cyathium. These bracteoles are fused, large and much divided in most species of Chamaesyce and this is probably derived from the simple, un- joined type that Haber suggests as the basic form for the genus Euphorbia. The fifth gland and the sinus in which it lies seem variable with- in species but are broadly similar through the genus Chamaesyce. The fifth gland occasionally develops in the full glandular form in C_, vagin- ul ata, indicating perhaps, that the primitive condition with five equal glands is not completely lost from the group. The glandular appendages are petal loid through most of the group, and their loss is a derived condition which is found consistently in only a few species. It is more common for pairs of appendages to develop to a different extent. This is of very frequent occurrence, and in one set of species the condition has developed to such a marked degree that the cyathium is covered at maturity by the greatly elongated pair which flank the sinus. These characters, and others in which changes are even less marked, give little insight into possible phylogenetic paths in the genus. With the large number of species to consider it is surprising that no grouping can be made, at the taxonomic level of ser i es for example, within the genus, The only groups which suggest themselves are those such as the species with expanded appendages, or those in which all cyathia are carried on congested laterals, which have no features to give a constant separation from the remainder of the genus. It is interesting to note that Wheeler (19^-1), in his study of approximately the same number of species from the 238. area north of the Caribbean, was equally unwilling to lay down lines, and Boissier (1862) divided his section An isophyl 1 um on patently arti- ficial grounds, and as a matter of convenience rather than phylogeny. The impression gained from this work with the genus in the Caribbean is that speciation is proceeding at a relatively rapid pace. The treatment here has been conservative in that many taxa recognized as species by earlier authors have been reduced to a lower taxonomic rank. This is due in some cases to the availability of a wider range of material than other workers used, which has shown their species to be merely the extremes of a continuous series, but more often to a different assessment of the degree of interchange of genetic material still taking place. The potential for complete separation in many of these cases appears to be high. Neither the pollen nor the seed is adapted for wide distribution, and this may account for the high degree of endemism shown by the group. All parts of the area studied had endemic species, in some cases restricted to a single island. In many cases it was possible to recog- nize similar species from the area, but others must relate more closely to taxa from other parts of the world, and emphasize the difficulties of phylogenetic speculation based on even as apparently contained an area as the Caribbean. BIBLIOGRAPHY ALAIN, Hermano. 1953. Flora de Cuba, 3. Contr. Ocas. 13, Mus. Hist. Nat. "Col. de la Salle", Habana, BOISSIER, E. 1862. Euphorbieae, in de Candolle, Prodromus systematis natural is regni vegetabilis, 15(2): 3-188. Paris. BRITTON, N. L. and MILLSPAUGH, C. F. 1920. The Bahama Flora. Pub- lished by the authors, New York. BRITTON, N. L. and WILSON, P. 1924. Scientific Survey of Porto Rico and the Virgin Islands, 5: Botany of Porto Rico and the Virgin Islands. New York Academy of Sciences, New York. BROWN, H. E. 1911. Euphorbia, in Thi s t 1 edon-Dyer , Flora of Tropical Africa, 6(1): 470-603. Reeve & Co., London. BROWN, R. I8l8. Observations on the natural family of plants called Compositae. Trans. Linn. Soc. 12: 76-142. BURCH, D. G. 1965. The application of the Linnaean names to some New World species of Euphorbia subgenus Chamaesyce. Rhodora, in press. BURMAN, J. 1737. Thesaurus Zeylanicus. Amsterdam. CROIZAT, L. 1936a. On the classification of Euphorbia. I. How important is the cyathium? Bull. Torr. Bot. Club 63: 525-531. . 1936b. Chamaesyce. in Degener, Fl. Hawaii, family 190, Chamaesyce 1 £• 4. Published by the author, Honolulu. . 1937. Chamaesyce, in Degener, Fl. Hawaii, family 190, Chamaesyce 2 & 3. Published by the author, Honolulu. DAVIS, P. H. and HEYWOOD, V. H. I963. Principles of Angiosperm Taxonomy. Van Nostrand Co., New York. D'ISNARD, A. T. D. 1720. Mem. Acad. Roy. Sci., Paris. ERDTMAN, G. 1952. Pollen Morphology and Plant Taxonomy. Chronica Botanica Co., Waltham, Mass. FARWELL, 0. A. 1936. Euphorbia pi 1u1 ifera in Michigan. Rhodora 38: 331-332. 239. 2^0. FAWCETT, W. and RENDLE, A. B. 1920. Flora of Jamaica, 4. British Museum, London. GRAY, S. F. 1821. A Natural Arrangement of British Plants, 2. Baldwin, London. GUNTHER, R. T. 1959. The Greek Herbal of Dioscorides. Oxford Uni- versity Press, Oxford. HABER, J, M. 1925. The anatomy and morphology of the flower of Euphorbia. Ann. Bot. 39: 657-707. HAWORTH, A. H. 1812. Synopsis Plantarum Succu lentarum. Taylor, London. . 1827. Descriptions of new succulent plants. Philos. Mag. S- Ann. Philos. n.s. 1: 271-277. JACQUIN, N. J. 1763. Select. Stirp. Amer. Hist. Vienna. KLOTZSCH, J. and GARCKE, H. 1859. Linne's Naturliche Pf lanzenklasse Tricoccae. Abh. Akad. Berlin 1859 (Phys.): I-IO8. LANJOUW, J. and STAFLEU, F. A. 1964. Index Herbariorum: 1. The Herbaria of the World, edition 5. International Bureau for Plant Taxonomy and Nomenclature, Utrecht. LINNAEUS, C. 1753. Species Plantarum, ed. 1. Stockholm. . 1754. Genera Plantarum, ed. 5. Stockholm. MERRILL, E. D. 19^8. Unlisted binomials in Chapman's Flora of the Southern United States. Castanea 13: 6I-83. MICHAUX, F. A. 1803. Flora Boreal i-Americana. Paris. MILLER, P. 1754. The Gardeners Dictionary, abridged ed. k, London. . 1768. The Gardeners Dictionary, ed. 8. London. MILLSPAUGH, C. F. 1909. Praenunclae Bahamensis II. Field Mus. Bot. 2: 289-322. MOVER, L. S. 1934. Species relationships in Euphorbia as shown by the electrophoresis of latex. Am. J. Bot. 21: 293-313. PAX, F. 1890. Euphorbiaceae, in Engler £- Prantl, Die Naturlichen Pf lanzenfami 1 ien, 3(5): 1-119. Leipzig. . 1924. Die phylogenie der Euphorbiaceae. Bot. Jahrb. 59: 129-176. 2k] PAX, F. and HOFFMANN, K. 1931. Euphorb iaceae, in Engler & Prantl, Die Naturlichen Pf lanzenfam i 1 ien, 2 Aufl,, 19c: 11-233, Leipzig. PERRY, B. A. 19^3. Chromosome number and phylogenetic relationships in the Euphorbiaceae. Am. J. Bot. 30: 527-5^1. PERSOON, C. H. 1806. Synopsis Plantarum. Paris. PUNT, J. 1962. Pollen morphology in the Euphorbiaceae with special reference to taxonomy. Wentia 7: 1-1 16. RAFINESdUE, C. S. 1817. Second decade of undescribed American plants. Amer. Monthly Mag. 2: 119-120. . 1838. Flora Telluriana, k. Philadelphia. REICHENBACH, H. G. L. 1841. Repertorium Herbarii s i ve Nomenclator Genera Plantarum. Dresden, RODGERS, A. D. 1944, American Botany 1873-1892. Princeton University Press, Princeton. ROEPER, J. 1824, Enumeratio Euphorb iarum. Gottingen, 1828, Euphorb ia, in de Candolle, Botanicon Gallicum, 1: 412-417. SCHOLZ, H, 1964, Euphorbiaceae, in Engler, Syllabus der Pf 1 anzenfami 1 ien , II. Dicoty ledoneae, 255-261. Gebruder Borntraeger, Berlin. SMALL, J, K. 1933. Manual of the Southeastern Flora. Published by the author. New York. TORREY, J. 1843. A Flora of the State of New York, Albany, New York, TOURNEFORT, J. P, de. 1700. 1 ns t i tut iones Rei Herbariae. Paris. URBAN, I. 1898-1928. Symbolae Antillanae seu Fundamenta Florae Indiae Occidental i s. Nine volumes. Berlin. URBAN, 1. and EKMAN, E. L, 1929. Ark. f, Bot,, Stockh. 22A: parts 8-I6, WHEELER, L, C. 1939. A miscellany of the New World Euphorbiaceae. Contr. Gray Herb. 127: 48-78. . 1941. Euphorb ia subgenus Chamaesyce in Canada and the United States exclusive of southern Florida. Rhodora 43: 97-154, 168-205, 223-286. Reprinted as Contr. Gray Herb. I36. 242. WHEELER, L. C. 1943. The genera of living Euphorbieae. Am. Mid. Nat. 30: 456-503. _. i960. Typification of Euphorb ia macul ata. Rhodora 62: 134-141. WIMAN, J. 1752. Euphorbia ejusque Historia Natural is. Uppsala. Re- printed in Amoen. Acad. 3: IOO-I3I. APPENDIX The following new names and combinations are used in this work, and will be validated by publication at a later date. New species Chamaesyce 1 eonard i i Chamaesyce tumi styl a New combi nat ions Chamaesyce lecheoides (Millsp.) Millsp. var. wi 1 soni i (Millsp.) Chamaesyce lecheoides (Millsp.) Millsp. var. exumensis (Millsp.) Chamaesyce porteriana Small var, keyens is (Small) Chamaesyce porteriana Small var. scopar i a (Small) Chamaesyce parci flora (Urb.) Chamaesyce hepatica (Urb. S- Ekm.) Chamaesyce helwigii (Urb. & Ekm,) Chamaesyce opthalmica (Pers,) Chamaesyce adenoptera (Bertol.) Small ssp, pergamena (Small) Chamaesyce adenoptera (Bertol.) Small ssp. qundlachi i (Urb.) Chamaesyce minutula (Boiss.) Chamaesyce deltoidea Small ssp. serpyl 1 um (Small) Chamaesyce deltoidea Small ssp. deltoidea var. adhaerens (Small) 243, BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Derek George Burch was born on June 26th, 1933, in Caerphilly, Glamorgan, Great Britain. He attended school in London, and college at University College of Wales, Aberystwyth, where he received a B.Sc. (Hons.) in Agricultural Botany in 195^. He carried out graduate work at that institution and at the University of Nottingham leading to an M.Sc. in 1957. After working for a sugar company in the Dominican Republic, and in various areas of horticulture in Miami and Montreal, Mr. Burch was admitted to the Graduate School of the University of Florida in September, I96I. He has been employed as a teaching and research assistant and as an Instructor In the Department of Botany, and as herbarium correspondent for the Agricultural Extension Service while pursuing his work toward the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Mr. Burch is a member of the Association of Applied Biologists, the Society for Experimental Biology, the Classification Society, and the Royal Geographical Society. Mr. Burch is married to the former Nancy Hudgins of Lake Wales, Florida, and they have no children. 2^. This dissertation was prepared under the direction of the chairman of the candidate's supervisory committee and has been approved by all members of that committee. it was submitted to the Dean of the Coli.^cje of Agriculture and to the Graduate Council, and was approved as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Ph i losophy. August, 1965 yC)P>>d€a^n, College of Agriculture Dean, Graduate School Supervisory Committee: Cha i rman ^242