A PUBLICATION CONCERNED WITH NATURAL HISTORY AND CONSERVATION TRAIL & LANDSCAPE Vol.ll No.l p.1-36 Ottawa, Jan.- Feb. 1977 TRAIL & LANDSCAPE Editors: Anne Hanes 18 Briarcliffe Drive, Ottawa, Ont. KIJ 6E4 Sharon Godkin Joyce Reddoch Production Staff: Marjorie Bond Leone Brown Dorothy Greene Rosemary Wallbank Business and Production Manager: Harry A. Thomson THE OTTAWA FIELD-NATURALISTS’ CLUB - Founded 1879 - President: Dr. Ewen C.D. Todd, 1818 Paisley Ave., Ottawa Corr. Secretary: P.J. Narraway, Box 3264 Stn. C, Ottawa Objectives of the Club : To promote the appreciation preservation and conservation of Canada’s natural heritage; to encourage investigation and publish the results of research in all fields of natural history and to diffuse information on these fields as widely as possible; to support and co-operate with organiz¬ ations engaged in preserving, maintaining or restoring environments of high quality for living things. Club Publications : THE CANAVIAN EJELV-hlATURALlST, devoted to publishing research in natural history. TRAIL S LANVSCAPE, a non-technical publication of general interest to local naturalists. Field Trips , Lectures and other natural history activities are arranged for local members. See inside back cover. Membership Fees : INDIVIDUAL MEMBERSHIP: (per year) $7.00 FAMILY MEMBERSHIP: (per year) $9.00 SUSTAINING MEMBERSHIP: (per year) $25.00 LIFE MEMBERSHIP: (one payment) $200.00 Libraries and other institutions may subscribe to Trail & Landscape at the rate of $7.00 per year (Vol.) Apply for Membership to : THE MEMBERSHIP COMMITTEE, Ottawa Field-Naturalists’ Club, Box 3264, Postal Station "C", Ottawa, Canada KlY 4J5 Second Class Mail - Registration #2777 Vol 11 No 1 © Published by THE OTTAWA FIELD-NATURALISTS’ CLUB Box 3264 Postal Station C, Ottawa, Ontario KlY 4J5 On the Path to the Present - - - _ 2 A. Pawley OTTAWA-CARLETON REGIONAL FOREST Introduction J. Reddoch - - - - 6 The Richmond Wetlands I. Bayly - - 9 One Naturalist’s Discovery A. Hanes 13 Prairie White Fringed-Orchid J. Reddoch 16 Birds A.J. Erskine ----- 20 Rare Plant Survey D.J. White - - 22 Winter Camping part two - - - - 26 S. Hamill How to See 200 Species of Birds in the Ottawa Area This Year ----- 29 P. Matthews, R. Poulin Autumn Birds 1976 ------ 32 J.A. Murray Coming Events - _ - inside back cover 1 Sally Pawley We present-day naturalists follow a primrose path compared to our predecessors. Naturalists today need only reach to the bookshelf for a field guide to almost any branch of natural history chosen to investigate. There are complete vegetation, climatic, soil and topographical maps, air photos, and lists of species belonging to the various divisions of natural history for each geographical area. We can thank the earliest OFNC members for a great deal of our present- day knowledge. It was the organized field work started in the late 1800’s that cleared the trail for OFNC members of today. The first lists of shells and flora in the Ottawa district were published during the first year of the Club’s existence. Bird lists appeared the following year; fishes, insects and mosses appearing soon after. The efforts that went into these inventories are impressive. In 1881, its third year, the Club organized itself into groups to take charge of five different branches of natural science: geology, botany, entomology, ornithology and o8logy, and conchology. A general zoology group was formed the following year. Each division had a leader. Working parties were formed in each group for the assistance of beginners and ”for the fuller development of the area”. The groups helped to serve as an inducement to members to take up study in one or more branches. Under this system began the valuable work from which we benefit today. 2 Work being conducted by each branch was reported to council once a year and prizes were awarded for collections made. Prizes were also offered by the president to members making the largest additions to the lists of species. One can imagine the fun of competition that enveloped those early activities. The Club’s success was due to membership participation coupled with good organization and the enthusiastic dedication of the leaders, whose attention to the Club’s development propelled it through the in¬ fant years. ”I’m surprised more members haven’t turned their eye to the study of ornithology”. James Fletcher once observed in an address to the Club — a surprising remark in view of the number of ’birders’ in the Club today. ”The number of entomologists in our Club is very small, I am sorry to say”, he remarked on another occasion (1880). (Fletcher himself became Honorary Entomologist for the Department of Agriculture several years later.) Dr. H.B. Small, Club president from 1883 to 1885, often urged members to not satisfy themselves just with fact-collecting and observing. Proper records, he in¬ sisted, were a necessity if future generations were going to benefit. Such remarks, recorded in the min¬ utes and Transactions, reveal the attentiveness given to the Club’s future by those leaders. A series of elementary lectures in botany was given by Fletcher during the winter of 1881. A success¬ ful effort, lectures became an important club activity for the next few years. Not only members but also the public received instruction in the various branches of natural science. This indicated, as H.B. Small proudly pointed out, that the Club was becoming more and more recognized as both willing and able to impart instruction in the natural sciences. The instructional lectures were quite separate from the regular soirees which continued during winter evenings. Papers read at the soirees, if on a member’s original research or if dealing with the natural history of the Ottawa district, continued to be published in the ’Transactions’. 3 In addition to regular summer outings, sub-excur¬ sions were started, and they too became a valuable club activity. These were half-day events organized by the various branches for the specific purpose of studies in each branch. The sub-excursions, though most success¬ ful, did not detract from the major club outings as had at first been feared. Rather, they involved members in good field work projects. In the meantime, pleasant summer outings continued. A memorable one found the naturalists roaming the grounds and museum of L.J. Papineau’s residence. This was a joint excursion with the Montreal Natural History Society to Montebello, where the hospitality "increased materially the enjoy¬ ment of the day". Another outing sent the group to Black Rapids, then "15 miles outside the city", in Dr. Wickstead’s steam yacht. With soirees, lectures, outings and sub-excursions one would believe the Club’s slate to be full, but there were other irons in the fire. In order to help carry on the work, council decided to apply for a grant from the Ontario Government. To do this, and "to improve its standing", the Club became incorporated in 1884. At this change in status the Club rules were modified to allow more "satisfactory" management of the organization, but it was several years before a grant was received. A dream of building up a national museum began to crystallize when the Royal Society of Canada was formed in 1882. The Society aimed to "cultivate and encourage all branches of intellectual culture" in Canada, and it was a great honour for the Ottawa Field-Naturalists to be invited to send a representative to the Society’s annual meeting. H.B. Small, representing the Club in 1883, reported back to his colleagues: "When the reports were read I was proud of the Club I represented, as no other showed such practical work and usefulness as our own." There were other honours, too. At the 1884 Dominion Exhibition the OFNC received a silver medal and a diploma for its exhibits of collections in various branches. Individual members also won prizes: Dr. Small for his collection of reptiles, Henry H. Ami for his 4 geological specimens, F.R. Latchford for his collection of land and freshwater shells, W.L. Scott for his col¬ lection of eggs, Mrs. Chamberlin for her paintings of fungi, H.B. Brunell for minerals, James Fletcher for insects, and R.B. Whyte for botanical specimens. With the opening of the Canada Atlantic Railway in 1883 new districts came under the eager scrutiny of the naturalists. Perhaps the broadening of territory also broadened H.B. Small’s visions for the Club’s future: "Could our example but start similar clubs in other districts, their work when added to ours would complete a system... There are naturalists in every district, to start whose energies some central force only is required. Could our na¬ tional centre of natural history but see its way clear to assume this duty, the most favour¬ able results would inevitably follow." Certainly as a result of the vision and energy within the Ottawa club the most favourable results did follow. The Club not only has contributed a great deal to local natural history, but also to naturalists’ activities across the country. RIDEAU TRAIL BOUNDARY ' / ” '*» t/» ^ •. /•/' I REGIONAL FOREST OTTAWA - CARLETON ^0/ies^ INTRODUCTION We naturalists only really discovered the Regional Forest last summer, and what an exciting place it is turning out to be I I guess it is because the mixture of habitats is new to us - wetlands and woodlands over limestone. The wetlands include not only cattail marshes, but also meadows, wooded swamps of several kinds, and both open and wooded bogs. Isabel Bayly des¬ cribes the area in the first of five articles we have put together to give you our impressions of this varied and extensive Conservation Area. Tony Erskine writes of the birds he noticed during a Club excursion there in early June. You will read about the plants: discovery of ginseng by Anne Hanes; an orchid new to the Ottawa area, reported by Joyce Reddoch; plants new and rare in the Ottawa area, by David White. The Ottawa-Carleton Regional Forest is designated as a Forest Management and Recreational Area in the Offi¬ cial Plan of the Regional Municipality of Ottawa Carleton. (See T&L 9(1) 17;1975). The Forest covers 46,300 acres in area, of which 8,300 acres are owned by the Region. At present about half of the Region’s land is managed by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. An addi¬ tional 480 acres of the Forest belong to the Ministry. The rest is still privately owned. The Regional Forest is not terribly scenic. In fact, it is not really a forest. It is a very flat land, drained by three wandering, shallow creeks,and the Jock River. And it is, for the most part, either very wet or very dry. In addition to its plants and birds, the Forest is home to many different mammals: deer, beaver, coyote, snowshoe hare, muskrat, mink, raccoon, skunk, and weasel. There is even evidence of lynx. Why not see what you can find there yourself this summer? Or try it out for skiing and snowshoeing. The Rideau Trail runs right down the middle. J.R. 7 A tamarack swamp along the Klondyke Road, Regional Forest. The railway runs through the middle of the Richmond Marsh (Bog) providing access to this vast area of cattail marsh, meadow, willows, and shrubby bog, surrounded by tamarack swamp, cedar swamp, and ash-elm swamp. (J & A Reddoch) 8 Natural History in the Regional Forest THE RICHMOND WETLANDS Isabel Bayly Between Richmond on the north and the Rideau River on the south, and encompassing at least 6000 acres, lies an area of wetland variously known as "Richmond Swamp" or "Richmond Bog". As the names imply, there are both bog and swamp components in the area, together with a much larger component which might best be called fresh¬ water wetlands. The area is not continuous wetland, but is subdivided by dry ridges into many pockets, large and small, where water collects, and where the water- oriented flora and fauna abound. From the point of view of individuals whose interests lie in the aquatic and semi-aquatic organisms, these areas provide a rich and varied terrain, where there is indeed "something for everyone". Present management of the area is divided among a number of agencies. Some of the areas are Provincial Crown Land, while others belong to the Regional Munici¬ pality of Ottawa-Carleton. The Canadian National Rail¬ way has a right-of-way through one of the major marsh areas. The Regional Municipality has given over the management of most of their lands to the Ontario Minis¬ try of Natural Resources (Forestry and Wildlife), and a management proposal exists which considers mainly the use of timber resources and the trapping of muskrats. The use of the area by wildlife, with the exception of the muskrat, has yet to be considered. In the wetlands there exists a number of distinct and diverse community types, each with its own distinc¬ tive flora and fauna. Many of the cedar swamp and beaver meadow communities have obviously enjoyed their high water levels by virtue of beaver activity, and beaver are still very active. In some places, dirt roads have become flooded and passage is difficult if not impossible. The swampy areas, rich with Mountain Holly (Nemopanthus ), Buckthorn (Rhamnus ) and Marsh Fern (Thelypteris palustris ), support significant populations of deer and grouse. The beaver meadows, with their 9 Combinations of open water, cover and food sources make por¬ tions of the Richmond wetlands ideal habitat for waterfowl. Old beaver meadows offer excellent food sources plus a range of diverse habitats for many species of birds. (G.C. Bayly) 10 forests of bare drowned trees, rich stands of Manna Grass ( Glyceria borealis ) and sedges ( Carex spp.)> plus the many pools of shallow fresh water, support resident broods of waterfowl, together with a good population of Great Blue Herons. Some places are a bird-watcher’s paradise, where Rose-breasted Grosbeaks pursue their nesting activities and the daily round of food-gathering as though observers were quite invisible. On pockets of ground which are slightly above water level following the spring melt period, one can find superb colonies of the now fairly rare Fringed Gentian ( Gentiana crinita ), and in the shallow waters Mermaid-weed ( Proserpinaca) can be found. Most of the common (and very beautiful) minor components of freshwater wetlands are readily observable. Low-grading willows are common in the area, as are vast colonies of cattails, and these tend to en¬ croach and restrict access of the waterfowl to this potentially rich area. Despite this, waterfowl are common, even abundant, not only in periods of migration but in the summer months as well. The CN railway line, which runs through a major part of the marsh, plays an important role for the resident fauna. Ballast along the right-of-way is used extensively by the turtle populations for egg-laying, incubation and sunning, and these activities in turn are monitored by the raccoons, which enthusiastically dig for turtle eggs in the dry ballast. The line also offers a good look at the marsh, and certainly many en¬ thusiastic observers have walked those long straight tracks armed with binoculars! Open moving waters are rather limited, but of course these support a strong population of lotic species, such as Potamogeton epihydrus , certainly not rare, but indicative of diversity of the marsh. The lentic waters support many species as well, particularly Bladderwort ( Utricularia vulgaris ) and some Frog’s-bit ( Hydrocharis morsus-ranae ). Of course the many minor species are also present, and reward the keen observer. Wetlands are important places. Not only do they function for man as a perennial water source in times of drought, a welcome reservoir in a dry land, but they serve as staging and nesting areas for the water- fowl, one of our important Canadian natural heritages. 11 The fact that the Richmond wetlands are so close to urbanized centres, and are thus endangered in many ways by the possibility of unplanned development and land- filling, suggests that a sound conservation programme should be undertaken now to preserve them. They are important places, beautiful places too, and they defi¬ nitely deserve to be maintained and conserved. To increase the value of wetlands in the Richmond area for wildlife populations, some form of management might be considered. Important prerequisites for waterfowl utilization are adequate open water, coupled with good cover and food sources. Both cover and food sources are certainly available, but there are sections of the marsh which might be opened up to increase the open water surfaces. Such pondings would encourage even more waterfowl to visit and nest. There is no need to institute practices such as controlled water levels which might easily flood the railroad right-of-way, and in any event a high water level is neither needed nor desired, since present water levels are entirely adequate. With very little work, the area could support many more waterfowl. The benefits to local wildlife would increase enormously by this simple (and minimal) form of wetland management. To the casual observer, or to those who think neither one way nor the other regarding natural habi¬ tats, marshes usually represent a wasteland — empty, wet and uninviting. To those who are willing to learn or who are already knowledgeable, a wetland teems with life, often rare and beautiful. Whether rare or common, that life is capable of existence only within the sanc¬ tuary of the wetlands themselves. The Richmond wetlands are one such sanctuary, close to man and yet a place apart, still mysterious, still challenging. Let us learn to value and conserve these important areas, so that man and nature may mutually benefit from their continuing presence. 12 Natural History in the Regional Forest ONE NATURALIST’S DISCOVERY Anne Hanes It was billed as a "working but fun" excursion of the OFNC to investigate bird life in an area little explored by naturalists, the Ottawa-Carleton Regional Forest — and I nearly passed it up. One had to be up and alert at an ungodly hour to arrive on site when the birds could best be counted. If my crystal ball had shown beforehand the birds I would find that day, I might well have stayed in bed, letting the dozen other naturalists do the counting. However, morning dawned magnificently with a full moon glowing softly, and in a pink haze at 5:45 a.m. we began our walk. Although our group made no outstanding discoveries birdwise, a bluebird family was an unexpected delight, and a novelty to most of us to find them nesting in a natural cavity rather than a man-made box. But Fate had an ace of a different suit up her sleeve, so to speak. My surprise that day was a botanical one, and I wouldn’t have missed my very own discovery of the fabulous ginseng for all the Yellow Rails in Richmond Marsh. Freezing hands and sopping feet were forgotten when the magic spot was reached and the treasure revealed. My fellow birders must be forgiven for not leaping in wild excitement over my find. Ginseng is nothing special to look at, but one aware of its curious history and present rarity couldn’t fail to be ( \ fascinated. Local bo tan- ists have been guarded in admitting they know places where it grows, and I have been sworn to secrecy regarding certain stands — with good reason, as you will see. 13 Used as a medicine for many centuries in China and Japan, the root of ginseng (Panax schinseng ) has made old men young and prevented all manner of ills. Manchurian ginseng was considered most effective, and at one time became so scarce that an imperial edict prohibited its collection there; it is recently reported to sell for $3000 a pound. Other sources were Korea and Chinese Turkestan. The demand for ginseng continued down the ages, and in 1716 someone with a sharp eye and a knowledge of Chinese custom made a startling connec¬ tion in the eastern woodlands of the New World: we had ginseng too, and in great quantity. American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius ) grew in huge patches in deciduous woods from southern Ontario and Quebec to Georgia and Oklahoma, and the market was waiting, across the Pacific. The discovery, wrote Marie^-Victorin in Flore Laurentienne, produced at that time as much excitement and cupidity as the news, much later, of gold in California. "The farmers, finding more profit in seeking Ginseng than in sowing wheat, abandoned their lands to roam the woods. Unfortunately, instead of letting the roots dry slowly in the loft, they put them in the oven to dry more quickly. This was the cause of the depreciation of Canadian Ginseng, and soon, of this great traffic there remained only the popular saying *C*est tombe comme le Ginseng’ — its gone the way of the Ginseng." The excitement was certainly over by 1834 in the Peterborough area of Ontario. In that year Catherine Parr Traill, describing her life as a pioneer in The Backwoods of Canada, tells of various wild plants re¬ appearing after clearing of land. "I have been obliged this spring to root out with remorseless hand hundreds of sarsaparilla plants, and also the celebrated ginseng, which grows abundantly in our woods: it used formerly to be an article of export to China from the States, the root being held in high estimation by the Chinese." Ginseng, a weed, yeti However, export from Canada continued, and by the late 1800’s ginseng must have been nearly extirpated around Ottawa. The settlers, bless their progressive pioneering hearts, had nearly wiped out the resource. In spite of active botanists from our Club’s beginnings to the present, very few local specimens of ginseng are in the National Herbariums. In fact, only one seems to 14 have been collected within 40 miles of Ottawa on the Ontario side - from "Gloucester, Ont." dated 1879. (There are 8 or 9 sites in Quebec nearby.) Let’s hope the Regional Forest discovery indicates a revival of ginseng wherever its habitat is maintained - another reason to urge protection of this rich and varied area. With the great ginseng hunt about over, cultivation of ginseng began, especially in Ontario in the 1920’s. Today you can buy stratified ginseng seed to grow in your own woods (real or simulated) and sell the roots in four to seven years. The average return for the dried root is $40 a pound for cultivated ginseng. One source states that the cultivated root is worth about 60% of the price paid for wild roots. With interest increasing in folk remedies, natural cures and herbal medicine, the market isn’t about to disappear. Is ginseng really a wonder drug? The Encyclopaedia Britannica (1963) dismisses the Chinese belief tersely, "There is no evidence... to indicate that ginseng has any value, either as a drug or as an aphrodisiac." Surely all those Chinese can’t be wrong. Nor is it only Orientals who rely on ginseng to put them back in shape. Johnny Rodgers, the "ordinary superstar" of the Montreal Alouettes, credits to ginseng his speedy recovery from a knee injury last fall. "The doctors told me I’d be out six to eight weeks with this leg and I made it back in half that time. It was ginseng that did it." (Ottawa Citizen, Oct 12/76). Now, all this emphasis on health and youth might tempt an unscrupulous middle-aged botanist to experiment with a loss to the Regional Forest of a few dozen plants However, I take to heart the words of the Ontario Naturalist on ginseng (Lindsay & Cruise, June 1975), "... its survival in Ontario is now precarious. Because of its rarity, nothing justifies the removal of the wild plant." I did, however, liberate a few of the handsome scarlet fruits on an August visit to the site, hoping to re-establish a colony in a safe and suitable habitat close to home. If, some day about eight years hence, you notice that my wrinkles have gone and I bounce with vim and vigour, you’ll know my experiment has succeeded. Never underestimate the possibilities of an OFNC excursion’. 15 PRAIRIE WHITE FRINGED-ORCHIDS IN THE RICHMOND MARSH. The plants varied in height from 81 cm down to 33 cm. The average height of the 40 plants at this station was 63 cm. The photographs were taken on July 11, 1976 by the author. 16 Natural History in the Regional Forest PRAIRIE WHITE FRINGED ORCHID A NEW ORCHID FOR THE OTTAWA AREA Joyce Reddoch For the first time Prairie White Fringed-Orchid (Habenaria leucophaea) has been found in the Ottawa areZ O^Tjuly 3, 1976, OFNC President Ewen Todd dis¬ covered several dozen plants, mostly still in bud, at various places in the Richmond Marsh, A week later, with Ewen now in Scotland, the author confirmed the identity of the now fully—flowering plants . Three weeks previously, David White had peeked into the tight bud of a Habenaria" *" in the eastern part of the Marsh and had seen a fringed lip - a hopeful sign for Prairie White Fringed-Orchid in that particular habitat. The distribution of Prairie White Fringed-Orchid is centered about the lower Great Lakes and includes ^ the upper Mississippi valley. The species is extremely rare in Ontario, Only two other stations have been dis¬ covered by the Native Orchid Location Survey, one sta¬ tion in eastern Ontario, the other in south—central On¬ tario. (See Ed Greenwood’s article in T&L 2(4), 110 (1968).) The late Canadian author of Our Wild Orchids , Frank Morris, had known two stations at the turn of the century, one "on the margin of a mud lake near Smiths Falls", and the other "in the moist heart of a tamarac swamp near Port Hope". Both stations had disappeared by the 1920’s, during which time he found an additional station in the Murray Bog 40 miles from Peterborough. There are a few other, mostly older, records from south¬ western Ontario. The Prairie White Fringed-Orchid often grows in soil which is favorable for farming, so that many suitable habitats have been drained and cultivated. Other sites have been flooded out by beaver activity, possibly including Morris’s station near Smiths Falls. did not collect any of these plants; I have deposited copies of some of the photographs accompanying this ar¬ ticle in the National Herbarium of Canada (CAN) and the herbarium of the Department of Agriculture (DAO ). '^This genus is called Dlatanthera by some authors. 17 A PRAIRIE WHITE FRINGED-ORCHID BEING MEASURED BY ALLAN REDDOCH IN THE RICHMOND MARSH. The orchids were growing in ankle-deep, standing water of pH 6.6, in an open, grassy meadow surrounded by cattails. Marsh Fern (Thel- ypteris palustris ) was common. Other species noted by Anne Hanes and the author were Marsh Marigold (Caltha palustris) , Buckbean ( Menyanthes trifoliata) , Swamp Horsetail ( Equisetum fluviatile) , Swamp Milkweed ( Asclep- ias incarnata ), Spotted Joe-Pye-Weed ( Eupatorium maculat- um) , Common Skullcap ( Scutellaria galericulata) , Bugle- weed ( Lycopus uniflorus ), Marsh Bedstraw ( Galium palus- tre) , Royal Fern ( Osmunda regalis) , Swamp Rose ( Rosa palustris) , and Wild Iris ( Iris versicolor) . No Pitcher Plants nor Sphagnum mosses were observed; however, there were some plants of these typical bog species further east where Gary Hanes spotted several additional plants of Prairie White Fringed-Orchid in a habitat which was shrubbier than that just described. right - PRAIRIE WHITE FRINGED-ORCHID has a raceme of -> fragrant, cream-white flowers with a deeply fringed, three-parted lip. Note the cleft in the central section of the lip. 18 Natural History in the Regional Forest BIRDS Anthony J. Erskine The Regional Forest is one of the largest tracts of undeveloped land in the Ottawa area south of the river. It is hardly virgin wilderness, as a railway track and a major road cross it, and various old roads and farmsteads are distributed through its northern parts. Besides woodland and old fields and the edges between them, it includes one of the largest marshes (strictly a bog or fen rather than a marsh) in the en¬ tire Ottawa region, so the variety of habitats is such as to be attractive to a variety of birds. However, the more interesting areas are inside and away from motor roads, which may explain why it was virtually neglected by local birders until Yellow Rails were reported in the bog last spring (T&L 10(4) 101). An excursion by the Club on 13 June 1976 was the occasion for observations by several parties in different parts of the Forest. The ’’Great Richmond Marsh” has been visited in re¬ cent years mainly as the site of a major concentration of Short-billed Marsh Wrens, an uncommon bird elsewhere in the region. But many other water birds may be seen there from the railway - ducks rise quacking from the wooded swamps to the east of the marsh or from the water-filled ditches by the track; blackbirds drift in and out in clouds from roosts there in late summer and fall; the stutter of Swamp Sparrows and Yellowthroats and the grunts of Bitterns are familiar sounds, while the Marsh Hawks sway and sweep far off across the sedge meadows. The Jock River, one’s constant companion for the walk in from Richmond, and also the main water sup¬ ply for the marsh, seldom offers more water birds than the odd Kingfisher or heron. Another marsh, partly im¬ pounded by beavers, lies between the North Gower—Smiths Falls road and the next concession north. I saw various ducks and a Black Tern there on the excursion day, but it is difficult of access as well as posted against trespass by a duck club. 20 Since old field succession is commonplace in the Ottawa area, the other main interest of the Regional Forest is its woodlands. These have survived in quan¬ tity largely because much of the land was too swampy to be useful if cleared. The area is now a patchwork of old fields, upland hardwoods, and cedar swamps, with occasional stands of dryland conifers such as hemlock and spruce. Wooded bogs in temperate latitudes are often looked on as "boreal islands", whose cool conifer stands sometimes harbour species typical of more north¬ ern regions. Nevertheless, most species so designated are actually distributed both in boreal and temperate areas in suitable habitats; Brewer (Wilson Bulletin 79: 371-396, 1967) concluded that in southern Michigan the "boreal island" hypothesis could not be sustained for birds, and our findings in the Regional Forest agree. Myrtle and Magnolia Warblers and Golden-crowned Kinglets were some of the birds seen that are typical of conifers and thus seldom seen in the largely cleared lands south of the Ottawa River during the breeding season. But such birds might well be found in suitable habitats in Lanark County, which are seldom visited at present since the much more extensive and accessible forests of Gatineau Park and points north are even closer. The mosaic of forest types in the Regional Forest gave rise to some odd juxtapositions, however. From one spot I could hear both the Crested Flycatcher of open hardwood forest and the Olive-sided Flycatcher of open conifer edge. A few minutes later, from a different spot, both the House Wren of hardwood shrubbery and the Winter Wren of conifer tangles could be heard singing. All the evidence indicates that we can expect these "boreal birds" here in suitable habitats, if we are prepared to walk in to them. Their preferred habitats are scarce near roads, and they won’t come far from their nesting areas in response to "spishing" in summer. There were plenty of birds to be found in the Regional Forest last summer — I noted 63 species during my walk there that day, and people in the other parties saw lots more. The important thing about that excursion, however, was not the number of bird species found, which could sure¬ ly have been exceeded by a motor tour of the local hot¬ spots, but rather that it fulfilled its dual objective of giving the participants a good time outdoors while adding to what we know about the Ottawa area. 21 RARE PLANT SURVEY: REVISIONS David J. White It has been two years since the publication of the Ottawa District Plant Survey (Lafontaine & White, 1974) and it now seems timely to bring it up to date. First, a number of new records have come in from the continu¬ ing botanical exploration of the district. Several of these records have come from the Richmond swamp complex - a vast wetland area, little botanized until last year. Undoubtedly, many more new ’finds’ will be made as this area is explored more fully. Second, Jack Gillett and I have just completed the new ’’Checklist of Vascular Plants of the Ottawa/Hull Region” and in so doing we have un¬ covered a number of previously overlooked records and excluded several erroneous records. There are also several additions to be made of plants which occur in sufficiently restricted areas to be regarded as rare, even though they may be rather common within those areas. In the new Checklist we have used basically the same def¬ inition of rarity as Don Lafontaine and I used in the initial rare plant survey (3 records or fewer) so that the plants listed as rare in the survey and in this up¬ date are more or less the same as those listed as rare in the new Checklist. We are hoping that the Checklist will be available this year. It includes English and French common names and an estimate of abundance for each plant, as well as a complete index. Here, then, are the changes to the survey of rare plants. Do you have any rare plant records? If so, send the information along to Jack Cillet or to me at the National Herbarium, National Museum of Natural Sciences, Ottawa, KIA 0M8. ADDITIONS Platanthera leucophaea ( Habenaria leucophaea ) - a lovely orchid considered rare anywhere in Ontario; found last year in the north end of the Richmond swamp. Interest¬ ingly, an old obscure record turned up from the south end of the same swamp complex, outside the district near Smiths Falls. (Reddoch, 1977). 22 Splranthes easel - the new name for the so-called intermedia * or the 'northern* vernalis ; known from two stations just outside the District (Merrickville and NW of Thurso) and likely to be found elsewhere as people look more closely for it. (Reddoch & Reddoch 1974). glandulifera - known from several collections within the Richmond swamp complex, and near Casselman. Prunes americana - known from several collections in the vicinity of Carleton University, Woodroffe Ave (Ottawa) and from Papineau Co. americana - known only from Cunningham Island in the Ottawa River. Staphylea trlfolia - only three areas known: Rideau River near Billings Bridge, Casselman (Dore, 1962) and the North Castor River; perhaps extirpated at the former two. Hellanthemum canadense - locally common at Constance Bay. fimbriatula - locally common at Constance Bay. Lycopus asper - long known from near Carleton University on the Rideau River, and found recently near Richmond. Pycnanthemum tenuifolium - a recent addition from Burritts Rapids on the Rideau River. Galium labradoricum - an old collection from Ottawa. NEW RECORDS OF PLANTS STILL CONSIDERED RARE Scheuchzeria palustris - previously known from a bog in Gatineau Park and Mer Bleue, this sedge-like plant was found last year in the Richmond swamp. Triglochin maritima - known previously from Mer Bleue (old records); found last year in the Richmond swamp and in a bog near Stittsville. Platanthera blephariglottis ( Habenarla blephariglottis ) - previously known from Mer Bleue (Lafontaine 1971); found in a bog near St. Francois de Masham. 23 Platanthera dila tata ( Habenaria dilatata) - found last year in a bog near Stittsville; Poltimore is the only other extant location known. Saururus cernuus - several records have been found from branches of the Castor River to augment the known Casselman collection, Carya ovata - known from Deschenes and an old collection from Casselman (Lafontaine & White 1974); a nice stand of mixed aged trees was found last fall in a ravine near Casselman. Hypericum canad ense — previously known only from old re¬ cords, this plant has been found in the Larose Forest. Zizia aurea — known only from Casselman (1903); found last year in the Richmond swamp. DELETIONS AND OTHER CHANGES Pellaea atropu rpurea - sparse; found near Low, and known from near Poltimore and a number of sites along the Gatineau Park escarpment. Spiranthes lucida - sparse; known from the north end of the Rideau River, Innis Point, Fitzroy Harbour, Carleton Place and Merrickville. Ranunculus trichophyllus (^. aquatilis var. capill aceus) sparse; two older records have been found. Dentaria maxima — material from both herbaria is still on loan to the USA for study, thus it is still unclear whether or not this plant occurs in the District. Erysimum inconspicuum - sparse; a few older records have turned up. Potentilla gracilis - a western species; the two records for the district are undoubtedly introductions and not native. Potentilla trid entata - well known from an exposed site on the Gatineau Park escarpment; another record listed pre¬ viously from Wrights Cove along the Rideau River is un¬ doubtedly a label error as the area lacks suitable habitat. 24 Rosa nitida - based on a misdetermination. Viola affinis - based on several misdetermined specimens. Lythrum alatum - reported from Shirley’s Bay but a detailed search has failed to find it. Until a specimen or photo verifies its occurrence it should be deleted. Myriophyllum heterophyllum - based on a poor sterile speci¬ men which cannot be determined with certainty. Until better material is found this plant should be deleted from our flora. Bartonia virginica - does not occur in the district, and its inclusion in the original rare plant survey was an unfortunate error. Phlox maculata - known only from High Falls (1895). Due to lack of recent records and the fact that this loca¬ tion is outside the District, it should be deleted. Utricularia minor - sparse; previously known only from an old record (McKay Lake), it has been found in Meach Lake, the Richmond swamp and a bog near Stittsville. It is perhaps more overlooked than rare as it seldom flowers in this area. Aster sagittifolius - based on several misidentified specimens. References Dore, W.G. 1962. The Bladdernut Shrub at Ottawa. Can. Field-Nat. 76: 100-103. Gillett, J.M., and D.J. White. Checklist of Vascular Plants of the Ottawa/Hull Region. In press. Lafontaine, J.D. 1971. The White Fringed-Orchid. T&L 5(5): 134-136. Lafontaine, J.D., and D.J. White. 1974. Ottawa District Plant Survey. T&L 8(3): 85-88. Lafontaine, J.D., and D.J. White. 1974. Shagbark Hickory in the Vicinity of Deschenes, Quebec. T&L 8(4): 110-111 Reddoch, A., and J. Reddoch. 1974. A New Ladies-tresses Orchid: Spiranthes intermedia . T&L 8(5): 135-137. Reddoch, J. 1977. Prairie White Fringed-Orchid. T&L 11(1): 16-19. 25 WIMTEK CAiUPIKi; part two SHARPENING WINTER SENSES Stew Hamill If you do venture out into the wintry blasts this year, either overnight (like the intrepid adventurers in the last issue) or just for the day, keep your senses sharpened: there are lots of things to see, hear, smell, taste, and think about. One of the most obvious things to look for is the record of past occurrences in the snow — the meander¬ ing trail of a fox as it searched for voles, the swoop marks of an owl which ended the track-making of an un¬ fortunate mouse, or the toboggan slide of a fun-loving otter. Don’t be fooled by the hare’s track; it has the curious habit of placing its hind feet before its front feet when hopping. Look carefully into holes in the snow. A small hole may lead to a vole tunnel, but a large hole with droppings in the bottom marks the spot where a grouse spent the night under a cosy blanket of snow, then exploded out the next day. You may cause one of these ’explosions’ by walking near a grouse still under the snow. Field guides are avail¬ able if you are not sure of your track identification. Information can be learned about wildlife popu¬ lations by watching for winter signs. Beaver tracks in the snow probably indicate that the beaver did not store enough food or a suitable variety of trees. A definite browse line on cedars and many twigs bitten off shrubs and lower branches may tell of an overabun¬ dance of deer. Incidentally, a twig bitten clean off was eaten by a hare; a twig bitten halfway through, then torn the remainder, was done by a deer, which has no upper front teeth. Be on the watch for the residents themselves. Winter birds are easy to detect but you must look closely to see a camouflaged snowshoe hare in its form. Small things can be interesting too. The bulge on the stalk of the goldenrod contains a fruit fly larva, waiting for the warmth of next spring before it emerges 26 as an adult. Some of these galls may have been drilled into by a downy woodpecker in its search for food. Tree identification is an entirely new project in winter. The maple you identified by its leaf last summer now has a different appearance, and offers only buds, bark, and form as clues. With a good book you may become familiar with these aspects of trees and use them to advantage next summer on difficult specimens. If you are out on a crisp winter night, you may hear a hunting owl, its call giving away both its loca¬ tion and identity. A camp in the northern woods is a good location to try howling for wolves. Your imita¬ tion need not be accurate; the writer managed to call a wolf to close quarters on the first attempt. I'm sure you will be feeling the nip of the air if you are out on skis or snowshoes, but if you put it out of mind momentarily you can feel other things. The sharp thorns of a hawthorn bush discourage herbi¬ vorous animals, while the barbs on the dried head of a burdock cling to clothing and fur, thus distributing the seeds. (Don't use your mitten to feel this oneI) Natural foods are available in winter, as well as summer, if you find yourself in a desperate situation. Rose hips provide vitamin C and the red buds of bass¬ wood form a tasty gum. Cattail roots and white birch inner bark are difficult to collect and not very flavourful, but they can keep a person alive. A. Hanes/ A. Reddoch 27 As you walk or ski or camp outdoors this winter, think about your fragility against the cold of nature. What would you do without your warm house to come back to? Then think about the plants and animals which must adapt to this time of hardship. Most birds just pack up and leave — the insect eater and those that depend on water would soon starve if they remained in this climate. Some animals, such as the squirrels, gather food and store it for winter use, only rarely venturing forth from their warm dens. Others store food in an¬ other way: by eating voraciously they put on enough fat to supply them during the winter season. The jumping mouse, chipmunk, and woodchuck become totally dormant and go into hibernation; while the bear, skunk, and coon merely sleep deeply, awaking from time to time and occasionally emerging during warm spells. The plants also have a variety of methods for coping with winter. The annuals produce enough seed to perpetuate the species next season, and are sacri¬ ficed at the end of summer. Other plants draw energy into their roots for storage, and leave exposed only woody parts with sufficient bark for protection against the cold. The spectacular leaf colours of autumn are a response to the approaching winter, as the leaves are cut off from their source of nourishment and are dis¬ carded. The conifers, however, have developed leaves which are cold-resistant and can survive the winter. You should also think about how the area you use will look in the spring. Will the trail you travel be marked by your litter? Will the sensitive bog you crossed show the impact of your beaten path? Will your campsite be marked by broken and stripped trees? If you are careful to cut only dead wood, to place your campfire in a location respecting tree roots, and to carry out all non-burnables, there should be no indication remaining of your passing. Suggested Guide Books Field Guide to Animal Tracks - Peterson Series *' Trees and Shrubs " ” Birds Birds of North America - Robbins et al. 28 HOW TO SEE 200 SPECIES OF IN THE OTTAWA AREA THIS YEAR Paul Matthews with Richard Poulin If you think seeing 200 species of birds in Ottawa this year will be difficult, you’re probably right. But by showing a lot of determination and by visiting a wide variety of habitats during the course of the year, it can be done. Rick Poulin had already found 222 species in Ottawa by August first of 1976. There will be five articles in this series, each covering the same period of time as the issue of Trail & Landscape in which it appears. We hope this series will help readers to see more birds in 1977 than ever before. We have to make a few assumptions for the purpose of this article. The first is that people will be able to identify the birds mentioned (some will be difficult I) Secondly, the birder will devote considerable time and effort to his hobby and be willing to travel to the areas referred to. Access to a car is essential to cover, at the right time, all the places mentioned. Remember that the philosophy that enables a bird¬ watcher to get a high year’s list is "see the rarity as soon as possible after hearing about it". This should always be his motto. For example, last year there was a Harlequin Duck in the early part of January, but by the middle of the month it had vanished. Those who went out right away saw it. Those who waited missed it. The place names mentioned are those of the NCC map of the Ottawa region. The names of the birds are those of the AOU 5th edition checklist of 1957 with the 1973 amendment. Now here is the first article dealing with birds one can see in January and February: The winters in Ottawa are harsh and one cannot expect to see a great variety of species. Some, however, will be very interesting and a few cannot be seen at any other time of the year. 29 You should be aware of the unusual birds found on the Christinas census (the newspaper columns are the best source of this information), and try to see them during the first weekend if they are still here. Don’t delay. Also try to find out whether there are any Gray Jays, Boreal Chickadees, Cardinals and Hoary Redpolls in the area and if so, where. The Cardinal (1) is best seen between first light and dawn. The search will probably bring you to some feeders where you should get Black-capped Chickadee (2), White-breasted Nuthatch (3), Downy Woodpecker (4), Hairy Woodpecker (5), Evening Grosbeak (6), Blue Jay (7), and Tree Sparrow (8) fairly easily; Rock Dove (9), Common Crow (10) , Common Star¬ ling (11) and House Sparrow (12) having been seen pre¬ viously. Hopefully you will already have one or two rarities on your list. Last year was an extremely good one for the Common Redpoll (13) but since these birds seem to follow a two-year cycle, they may be scarce in 1977. We’ll assume you will see some this year although per¬ haps not this early. Look for Hoary Redpolls among the flocks of Commons. The following trips should be made in January. There is a pair of Screech Owls (14) at Billings Bridge woods. This is a good time of year to find them. You can see Snowy Owl (15) in the Limebank, Ander¬ son and Leitrim Rd area behind Upland Airport in the east, or along Fallowfield Rd near Woodroffe and Green- bank Rd in the west. Also in these open areas watch for Northern Shrike (16) and Snow Bunting (17). In large flocks of Snow Buntings look for Lapland Longspur (18). Ring-necked Pheasant (19) can be seen at Green Valley Crescent near Base Line and Highway 16, or an¬ other good place is Forest Hill Rd south of Baseline Rd. Another expedition involves looking for Black-backed Three-toed Woodpecker (20) and Northern Three—toed Wood¬ pecker (21). These will be difficult to find, unless we have an invasion similar to that of two years ago. Best bets are areas with large dead or dying elms such as old swamps. Next check the Central Experimental Farm (Ash Lane) for Pine Grosbeak (22) and Gray Partridge (23) near the beef showcase manure pile. Finally try the Arboretum for Bohemian Waxwing (24). 30 During February you should try Vydon Acres near Galetta and Alrnprior for Goshawk (25) and Pileated Woodpecker (26). You might also go up to Denholm Dump west of Poltimore for Common Raven (27) and possibly Gray Jay (28) in this area. Check the tall pines for Red Crossbill (29) and White-winged Crossbill (30) if you haven’t already seen them. Great Horned Owl (31) is common but sometimes dif¬ ficult to see. Try Carlington ski hill woods (north end of Clyde Ave). Great Gray Owl will be a bonus bird - check for it in cedar patches in semi-open country throughout the winter. Hawk Owl and Gyrfalcon are spe¬ cialties to be on the watch for at this time of year. There has been a male Barrow’s Goldeneye (32) appearing near the Champlain Bridge for five winters in a row (a record.’?). To see him, park at the Kitchissippi Lookout and walk back towards the bridge. About halfway there, where a slight bend occurs in the path, look downriver toward a log crib out in midstream. The Barrow’s will be in this area. Check all the Goldeneyes carefully and you are sure to see this most beautiful duck. February is mainly a month when you can see the things you missed in January. Visit the feeders to see if any starving waifs show up and be aware of any rarities that are around. Remember that bird numbers dwindle as the winter advances, so that February can be a very bleak time of year. Don’t despair if some birds don’t turn up. Winter birds, especially finches, are very erratic - abundant some years, almost absent in others. Birds you miss at this time of year may be more common in November and December. If you get des¬ perate you can go to Manotick to see Mallards, Black Ducks, Common Goldeneye, Common Mergansers and a lot of hybrids, but this is hardly necessary as you’ll see these later on while looking for rarer species. The bird columns in newspapers, as well as the people named in them, are a good source of information - use them’. Areas to check whenever possible: the bird feeder at the Jack Pine Trail off Moodie Drive, and the open water at Britannia and the Champlain Bridge. If further details are required as to the places mentioned in this article, don’t hesitate to contact Rick Poulin at 232-4687. 31 The autumn of 1976 will perhaps be remembered for two things: shorebirds, and abrupt weather changes. During migration, birders watch the weather patterns as well as the birds. Weather during September was cooler than usual. Early October was warm, but an unseasonable snowfall on Thanksgiving weekend gave us a taste of winter, and most southbound land birds moved out. Water levels during the period reached lows for the year, producing suitable shorebird habitat; Ottawa Beach, Shirley's Bay and Munster Sewage Lagoons were especially productive. Rarities included Hudsonian Godwits, Whimbrel, Little Blue Heron and Long-billed Dowltcher. More about these, and others, later. Common Loons were very slow to move through the area. Pied-billed Grebes became conspicuous in late September. Two Double-crested Cormorants appeared in mid-September, followed by another, five weeks later. Bruce Dllabio saw an adult Little Blue Heron flying near Graham's Bay on September 17. Great Blue and Black-crowned Night Herons were scarce after the first of October. The largest flocks of Canada Geese appeared near the end of September, and a Snow Goose lingered at Ottawa Beach for several weeks. Brant moved through 32 during the third week in October. Duck migration pro¬ ceeded normally, with the winter population arriving as expected. For the fifth consecutive fall, a male Barrow's Goldeneye appeared on the Ottawa River between the Kitchissippi Lookout and the Champlain Bridge. It was seen first on October 21. The same day, a female Harlequin Duck was observed downriver on the Quebec side, near Val Tetreau in Hull. A female Harlequin spent a good part of last winter in the same place. The river rapids and rocky shore there seem to be to a Harlequin's liking. How many other Harlequins may have visited such places in our area, unnoticed, over the years? This fall's sighting is the third record for the Ottawa area. An account of the other records, "The Harlequin Duck in the Ottawa Valley", by Dan Brunton, appeared in the Nov-Dec 1976 issue of Trail & Landscape. Only two Turkey Vultures were seen this fall, both in September. All three accipiters were observed in usual numbers. Last summer, four young Peregrines were released north of Hull. Subsequent sightings of immature Peregrines, believed to be the same birds, indicates that they were doing well. Four Peregrines reported in early September may also have been these. Two others later in the month may have been migrants. A spectacular flock of 51 Hudsonian Godwits and a Whimbrel were found at Ottawa Beach on October 1 by Bruce Dilabio, Rick Killeen and Ron Auger. Other Hudsonians appeared September 19-21 (the first Hudson- ians to be logged on the annual fall count) at Shirley's Bay, and October 3 at Munster Sewage Lagoon. Two Long¬ billed Dowitchers were seen and heard at the Munster Sewage Lagoon on September 25. These were subsequently photographed. A flock of 350 Golden Plover were at the Experimental Farm on September 2. White-rumped Sand¬ pipers were seen in flocks of up to 10. A Sandhill Crane was observed again at Ashton on September 17 and October 3. Wilson's Phalaropes were seen on September 4 and 5. Only five Northerns were reported, one-third the record numbers of last year. Ten Red Phalaropes were spotted on just one day, October 23. A pair of Franklin's Gulls was reported on Sep¬ tember 10. Bob Gorman saw a Sabine's Gull at Britannia 33 on October 6. But the best place for gull-watching continued to be the Ottawa Dump where Iceland, Great Black-backed and Thayer’s Gulls could be seen in ones and twos daily, among thousands of Herring and Ring¬ billed Gulls. The first Glaucous Gull was reported on October 29. Flycatchers were gone by the end of September, except for the hardy Phoebe. These continued to be seen here and there throughout October. Horned Larks began to appear in flocks of up to 50 by mid-October. Flocks of more than a thousand Tree Swallows were seen on September 23 and 25. Few swallows were found after that. Some Tree and Rough-winged Swallows seen on October 20 near the Champlain Bridge represent very late stragglers. Two Mockingbirds were still present through the period. Hermit Thrushes could be found throughout October, but Swainson’s Thrushes were not seen after the early part of the month. A Gray-cheeked Thrush was reported on October 10. Robin flocks built up until mid-October when approximately 400 swarmed into Pinhey Forest during the late afternoon of the 16th. Robin sightings decreased through the remainder of the month. Four late Bluebirds were at Shirley’s Bay on October 24. Three Blue-gray Gnatcatchers were seen during the second week in September. A Solitary Vireo was still present on October 23. A noticeably heavy wave of small land bird migra¬ tion took place the night of September 16, apparently mainly warblers. This wave was also noted as far away as Toronto, and coincided with heavy kills at tall buildings there. As usual, the warbler migration was mainly over by early October, except for Yellow-rumps and a few other stragglers. By mid-September, mixed flocks of Blackbirds num¬ bering 10,000 were roosting at Thurso and Ramsayville. A Cardinal was still seen occasionally in Aylmer. ’’Winter” finches were scarce. A few Evening Grosbeaks appeared by mid-October, but crossbills were hard to find. According to a report in the Toronto 34 Globe and Mail of October 27, crossbills had arrived in that part of the province a month early. This suggests a poor cone crop and a food shortage for the finches farther north. Will these birds remain scarce here all winter? Time will tell. While bird-banding at Ottawa Beach on October 2, Colin Griffiths netted a Sharp-tailed Sparrow, a rarely seen migrant. The bird obligingly stayed the next day and was appreciated by many observers. Tree Sparrows began to appear by the second week in October. As ex¬ pected, Fox Sparrow reports increased during the second half of October. A flock of more than 30 Lapland Long- spurs decorated a field near Antrim, and 50 Snow Buntings occurred in a flock on the 23rd. Farther afield, a Northern Wheatear was discovered at Deep River, Ontario on October 16, an exciting find indeed! Wheatears breed in the far north and winter in Europe. This thrush-like species has been seen in migration several times before in southern Ontario (including Manotick) and southern Quebec. At the time of writing (Nov 7), waterfowl and some shorebirds continue to move through our area. Raptor and passerine winter populations are becoming stabilized. Feeders are in operation. What rarities will this winter bring? Will watchers be rewarded with another Fieldfare? Varied Thrush? A Townsend’s Solitaire, perhaps? Wait and see. 35 NEST NEEDED The National Museum of Canada requires a multi¬ storied warbler nest caused by cowbird para¬ sitism. Payment offered. Call 993-3028 in Ottawa, or write to the Design and Display Division, 39 McArthur Rd., Ottawa. Anyone interested in par¬ ticipating in Sunday field trips with the Senior group of the Macoun Field Club as drivers or leaders, or in simply sharing the learning and fun of our weekly outings, please contact David Gray at 998-4141 or 521-9000. MEMBERSHIP FEES It is that time of year when Membership fees fall due for 1977. Please renew your member¬ ship with the FIRST NOTICE and save the Club money, time and effort. In 1976 the Club sent out 319 SECOND NOTICES at a cost of over $25 for stamps plus ten man¬ hours of labour. It also costs money to ask the computer for the Second Notice label run. M.W. Ney, chairman. Membership Committee In the last issue, p 130, the point in the upper left corner of the distribution map of LARGE PURPLE FRINGED- ORCHID got left off. The point represents the 1975 collection on the Picanoc River near Kazabazua, Que. Although the site is outside the recognized (30-mile circle) study area, it is within the somewhat larger study area of the Native Orchid Location Survey. An article about the Survey and its work will appear in the next issue. 36 OFNC EVENTS IN JANUARY AND FEBRUARY Arranged by the Excursions and Lectures Committee Roger Taylor (731-9270), Chairman. Monday 31 January ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING Meet: Auditorium, National Research Council 100 Sussex Drive Time: 8:00 p.m. Films and/or slides will be shown as time permits after the business meeting. Tuesday 8 February OFNC MONTHLY MEETING A LOOK AT THE SOUTH-WEST Speakers: Meet: Time: Jo Ann Murray and Hue MacKenzie Activity Centre, National Museum of Man, Metcalfe and MacLeod 8:00 p.m. -^5 - V V An illustrated presentation of a naturalist tour through New Mexico, Arizona and Texas. Sunday 20 February FIELD TRIP: WINTER BIRDS Leader: Steve O’Donnell (737-5270) Meet: Loblaw’s, Carlingwood Shopping Centre, Carling at Woodroffe Time: 8:00 a.m. Half-day trip - bring a snack. ISSN 0041-0748 TRAIL & LANDSCAPE published by THE OTTAWA FIELD-NATURALISTS' CLUB Second Class Mail - Registration Number 2777 Postage paid in cash at Ottawa Change of Address Notices and undeliverable Copies Box 3264 Postal Station C, Ottawa, Ont. KlY 4J5 Return postage guaranteed Lithographed by John Marquardt, Printer