REYNOLDS HISTORICAL GENEALOGY COLLECTION ALLEN COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY 3 1833 00855 1787 GENEALOGY 942.4501 SH84T 1895 i Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2014 https://archive.org/details/transactionsofsh07shro, TRANSACTIONS. OF THE SHROPSHIRE ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND NAT PR A L HISTORY SOCIETY. ESTABLISHED 1877. a u h 111 o 11 r a 11 ic a re 11 v re d 2nd SERIES, JL § . 7 VOL. VII., 18 95 __\L J_ P HINTED FOU THE SOCIETY S H REWSBURY: ADNITT AND NAUITO N , T H E S Q IJ A l< K . OSW E S T It Y : WOOD ALL, MINSIIALL AND Go. 1895139 L WOODALL, M IN SHALL, AND CO. PRINTERS, ETC., OSWESTRY AND WREXHAM. SHROPSHIRE ARCHiEOLOGIAL AND NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY, CONTENTS of 2nd Series, Vol. VII. Page. The Members of Parliament for Ludlow. By Henry T. Weyman 1 Whitchurch in the Reign of Queen Elizabeth. By The Rev. H. B. Finch, M.A, Vicar of Ash 55 Shropshire Topographical and Genealogical Manuscripts pre- served in the Bodleian Library, Oxford. By the Rev. W. G. D. Fletcher, M.A., F.S.A., and Miss Auden... 79 Shropshire Topographical and Genealogical Manuscripts in the William Salt Library at Stafford. By the Rev. W. G. D. Fletcher, M.A.r F.S.A 94 An Inventory taken at Park Hall in 1761, with a Notice of the Families of Powell, Charlton, and Kinchant. By Stanley Leiqhton, M.P., F.S.A. 97 Notes on the Church, Castle, and Parish of Shra war dine. By the Rev. John Ernest Auden, M.A., Curate of Shrawar- dinc 120 The Registers of Shrawardine, 1G45 to 1812. Transcribed by the Rev. John Ernest Auden, M.A ♦ 162 The Berrington Love Feast. By the Rev. A. Tiiursby- Pelham, M.A 203 Selattyn : A History of the Parish — The Rectors (continued) By the lion. Mrs. Bulkeley-Owen ... ... ... 207 Parish of High Ercall. Churchwardens' Accounts. By the Hon. and Rev. Gilbert H. F. Vane, M.A., Vicar of High Ercall 235 Postscript to the Paper entitled An Inventory taken at Park Hall in 1701. By Stanley Leighton, M P., F.S.A. ... 239 The Ottley • Papers relating to the Civil War. Edited by William Phillips, F.L.S. ... ... ... ... 241 The Family of Ottley of Pitchford. By the Right Hon. Lord Hawkesbury — Pedigree of Ottley ... 361 Extracts from the Parish Registers of Pitchford ... 369 Monuments in Pitchford Church ... ... ... 375 Monumental Brasses in Shropshire. By Mill Stephenson. B.A., F.S.A ... 381 The History of Myddlc. By the Rev. Canon Egerton, M.A. vii, t SHROPSHIRE ARCHAEOLOGICAL AN I) NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY. ANNUAL MEETING. The Annual General Meeting of the members of this Society was held at the Shirehall, Shrewsbury, on Saturday, February 23rd, 1895. The Rev. G. H. Egcrton, M.A , Hector of Mjddle, and Prebendary of Lichfield, presided, and there were also present Sir OfHey Wakeman, Bart., the Rev. T. Audcn, E.S.A. (Chairman of the Council), Rev. W. II. Egerton, Rev C. H. Drink water Rev, I). 1). Bennett, Rev. W. G. D. Fletcher, F.S.A., Mrs. G. H. Egerton, Miss Audcn, Messrs. W. Beacall, G. S. Corser, H. W. Adnitt, W. Burson, W. Bowdlcr, and F. Goyne (secretary). ANNUAL REPORT. The Secretary read the Annual Report of the Council, as follows: — The chief event of the pasb year was the visit to Shrewsbury, in July, of the Royal Archaeological Institute, on the invitation of this Society. The members of the Institute, under the presidency of Sir Henry Howarth, were welcomed to the town by his Worship the Mayor, and. during the week of their visit, excursions were made to the principal objects of archaeological interest in tho county. At the sectional meetings also, papers of great local interest were read, both by members of the institute and those of our own Society. These will be preserved permanently in the Journal of the Institute and our own Transactions. It is pleasing to record that our visitors were unanimous in their expressions of gratification with the arrange- ments made on their behalf by our Society, and the cordial welcome they received in the town and county generally. The Council wish to take the opportunity of this report to express their indebtedness to Messrs. Clement and Herbert Southam, who organised a lecture in April last, for the purpose of raising funds for the illustrations of the Transactions. A sum of more than £15 was secured by this means, and members of the Society will be pleased to think that the first important draft upon it will be made to illustrate the able and exhaustive paper on " Shropshire Monumental Brasses," which was read in July last by Mr. Mill Stephenson, the Hon. Secretary of the Archaeological Institute. The Council believe that tho "Transactions" during the past year have maintained their character, and have not been wanting either in general or local interest, but it is still a matter of regret that the roll of members of the Society falls far short of what might reasonably be expected in such a county as our own — Signed, Thomas Auden, F.S.A., Chairman of the Council. The General Balance Sheet showed that the balance in the Bank was £4 10s. 7d ; arrears of subscriptions, £49 7s., which the Secretary estimates, to produce i. 25 4s., making a deficiency of £27 18s. 4d., as compared with a deficiency last year of £50 Ds. 7d. The Chairman moved that the Report and Statement of Accounts be received and adopted, lie said he was very glad to lind that the VI. amount of the debt owing by tbe Society had been reduced nearly one-half. Rev. T. Auden, in seconding the motion, said he was very pleased to see ladies present at the meeting. It was an innovation that began last year, and he hoped it would go on and increase. (Hear, hear.) The report of the Council allucjed to the great event of the past year, namely, the visit of the Archaeological Institute. He believed that the members thoroughly enjoyed themselves, and were very much interested in what they saw in Shropshire j and he was quite sure that some of them went home greatly impressed with the enormous amount of archaeological interest there was in the county. (Hear, hear.) He thought the visit not only gave pleasure to the members themselves, but he hoped it also secured for tlicm some archaeological information which they did not possess before. The visit of the Institute, as might be expected, bad had a good effect upon themselves as members of the local society. He might mention one matter which lately came under his notice. A very interesting paper on " The Brasses of Shropshire " was read by Mr. Stephenson, the lion, secretary of the Institute, who took an immense amount of pains with his subject, and he (Mr Auden) had a letter from him two or three days ago, in which he stated that a clergyman in the county had succeeded since the visit of the Institute in getting possession of one of the lost brasses, which had gone into private hands. It had now been recovered, and no doubt would be taken great care of. Mr. Stephenson would deal with it in his paper, which would be published not only in the Journal of the Institute, but in the Transactions of the Shropshire Society, and it would ultimately, he hoped, be restored to its original place in the church to which it belonged. (Hear, hear.) He desired to express his satisfaction that the finances of the Society presented a better appearance than they did this time last year. They were gradually getting into a better position than they were in previously ; but while he said that they were improving from a financial point of view, he could not help calling attention to the paragraph in the report which stated that the number of members of the Society was still very far from what he thought it ought to be. He sincerely hoped that, as a result of that meeting, there would be an increased interest awakened on the part of those who lived in the county, and who, he knew, were interested in these matters, but who somehow never got quite to the point of becoming members of the Society. (Hear, hear.) The Report was unanimously adopted. THE COUNCIL. Sir Offley Wakeman moved the re-election of the retiring members of the Council. He remarked that many of these gentlemen had served in that capacity for some time, and he was sure that all present appreciated the work they had done for the Society. (Hear, hear.) No year had been more important than the one which had passed for archioologists, for the reasons stated in the report. fie wished to vii. / reiterate very strongly what had been said about the lack of interest shown by the inhabitants of the county in the Society. The list of members, he was quite sure, did not at all adequately represent the number of persons who ought to belong to such a Society, and who would belong to it if they could only bring its claims before them in a sufficiently forcible manner. (Hear, hear). No doubt the Council j had done all they could in this direction, but if the Council itself, or j some individual members of it, could think out a scheme for bringing i the claims of the Society more before the public, he thought many i gentlemen in the county would join. (Hear, hear.) The Rev. W. H. Egerton seconded the motion, which was carried. ELECTION OP AUDITOR. Mr. Beacall moved " That the best thanks of the meeting be given to the Auditor, Dr Calvert, for his services in the past, and that he j be again appointed for the current year." He remarked that Dr. ' Calvert most kindly undertook the duty, and the members of the Society were very much indebted to him for his services. Mr. Corser seconded the motion, which was carried. i THE niSTORY OF MYDDLE. The Chairman then read the following interesting paper on this subject : — I am surprised at finding myself in my present position, for I am learned neither in Arclueolo^y nor in Natural History, but I value both sciences greatly, and have been a member of this Society almost, I believe, if not quite from its commencement. When your Council, therefore, did me the honour, through their Chairman, of asking me to discharge the duties of Chairman at your Annual Meeting, I felt that, notwithstanding my unfitness for the post, it would be ungracious of me to refuse, and that I ought to try and do what little I could in the interests of the Society. In making known to mo the request of the Council, Mr. Auden suggested I that I should have no difficulty in writing a suitable paper, as there were t many objects of interest in my own parish of Myddle. I have taken the hint, f and have simply set down what those objects arc, with a few remarks upon each. At the same time, I feel that I can tell most of you nothing with which you are not already familiar. As our parish history, at least up to j about 200 years ago has been written, and of late years published, I cannot do better than begin with a few words respecting that very remarkable work, I Cough's History of Myddle, to which I am indebted for much of that I am going to lay before you. Mr. Richard Gough was born in the middle of the 17th century, and. lived I on his own estate at Newton-on-the Hill, in the Parish of Myddle. He wrote the History of the Parish in the year 1701, and after describing the parish \ itself, with its boundaries, streams, meres, its Church, and Castle, and so forth, he writes the history of the chief families in the parish, in a way which k is paid to be quite unique. He gives a plan of the Parish Church, with every ) pew marked on it, and numbered, and then proceeds to take each pew in j order, and to write a genealogical history of those who sat in it. In these days he most certainly would have found himself involved in not a few actions j for slander. He, however, takes the bull by the horns, and thus quaintly I defends himself, "If any man shall blame me for that I have declared the various lives or actions of their ancestors, let him take care to avoid such evil f courses, that ho leaves not a blemish on his name when ho is dead ; and let i viii him know that I have written nothing out of malice." The original manu- script is in possession of Mrs. Biokerton, now living at Harmer Hill, and I can certify to the correctness of the copy that was printed by Messrs. Adnitt and Naunton in 1875, having myself compared every proof sheet with the original, and having carefully traced the title pages and plans from those of the manuscript. Sir Thomas Phillips in the year 1834, printed this work for private circulation only. It was, however, a very imperfect copy, and could not have been taken from the original manuscript. In proceeding to speak of Myddlo itself, I will say first that I shall feel greatly obliged for any cluo to the origin of the name. I have taken pains to ascertain the various ways in which the word has been spelt. Previous to Domesday Book it was " Mutla ;" in Domesday Book it is Mulleht. Query, Millhcad? No mill mentioned in Domesday. But in 1172, John le Strange is recorded in a Bull of Pope Alexander III. to have given to Haughmond Abbey the Mill of Mudle. There is now no stream strong enough to turn a mill, though possibly thero might have been before Harmere Moss was drained. Then Malde and Madia till near the end of the 12th century, it became Mudle ; then Medle, and in the Va'or Ecclesiasticus in 1535, Medell. When I came to Middle, it was always spelt with an w i," as many spell it now, but I have done my best to substitute a " y," which is the way in which it is mostly spelt in Gough's Manuscript. I have found the common way of spelling it with an W at times to cause confusion, giving strangers the idea that Middle Rectory, Shrewsbury, meant a Rectory attached to one of the churches in Shrewsbury. If, as there used to be at Malpas, for instance, an upper rectory and a lower, why should there not also be in Shrewsbury a Middle Rectory as well. Only the other day I received a letter addressed to me at Middle St. Peter's, Shrewsbury, and a few years ago, a clergyman who had been my guost, writing afterwards, addressed his letter to me at " Inside Rectory ." 1 Passing from the name to the Church itself, the structure has nothing very ancient about it, the body having been built at the worst of all periods of Church architecture, the middle of the 18th century, 1744. Gough tells us that the tower was built in his father's time, about the year 1634, and that its predecessor was only of stone as high as the wall plate of the Church, and upwards from that it was built of timber. It became very ruinous in Mr. Kynaston's time, who was Rector of Myddle at the close of the 16th century (1596 to 1629). He offered to rebuild it from the foundations to his own height above the ground, at his own cost, if the parishioners would do the rest ; but they refused, and soon after his death it fell down. This Mr. Kynaston was buried in the chancel, where there is a brass plate bearing the following inscription : — "Here lyeth the Body of Ralph Kinaston, M.A., Prebend of St. Asaph, Chaplino to King James, Parson of Myddle ; where after 33 years he had carefully and religiously performed his calling his soule went unto his Maker to give an account thereof Nov. 8th A.D. 1629. A0 iEtat 69." The mason who rebuilt it was one John Dod, who received £5 for every yard in height from tho bottom of the foundation to the top of the battle- ments. That this John Dod must have had other masons to holp him is evident by the number and variety of the masons' marks still to be seen on the stones. Within the tower we have only three bells, but one of them bears l Since the above was written, tlio following letter lias been placed in my hands:— " Tho name ' My.ldle' must have undergone ever so many changes in spelling, consequently it is very difficult to find out its etymology, But I am of opinion that wo can rely upon tho form given in Domesday as much as anything, viz., ' Mulleht '—Gael, Mull = M call— any rising ground of a spherical shape, Probably the Welsh Aloel and the English Hill are of the same origin, because according to Grimm's Law, m and li interchange. The termina- tion eht, or, as I fancy, eth is of less importonce, because evidently the weight of its import lies in 1 Mull;' and as an Englishman is generally perplexed at the pronunciation of the Welsh or British '^."particularly in old times, when learning was likely backward, naturally the aspirated 1 11' had to bo pronounced i die, ; hence M uddle ! and Myddle ! I More than this, if thero bo an elevation of ground there, or near, an old Uritish Eortlll- cation might be formerly on the top, which may be another reason for willing it ' Mulleht ' f ix. ' an inscription, which I have never heard of anywhere else. It runs thus : — " Coeteros voco ipse non intro" ("I summon others, but I enter not myself "). I have no doubt that the author of this legend was our friend the historian, for the name of Richard Gough is on the bell as Churchwarden, the date (1GG8) proving that of the eight Richard Goughs of which he tells us, it could only have been himself who at that date would have been 34 years old. Moreover, he was specially proud of his scholarship, his History being full of Latin quotations, and this was just the kind of quaint conceit in which, to judge from his book, he would much delight. With respect to the other two bells, there is nothing specially worthy of notice, beyond the fact that one of them is dedicated to St. Peter and St. Paul, whereas we have always under- stood that the Church is dedicated to St. Peter alone. The legend on the bell runs thus : — " Petrus Apostolus et Paulus Doctor Gentium." I can find no date on it. Entering the Church itself, the object most worthy of interest is a some- what remarkable brass to the memory of Arthur dhambre of Petton, and Patron of Myddlo. The brass is in vory good preservation, and consists of offigics of himself, his wife, and two children, with his coat of arms at tho head and tho inscription below. It runs thus " Hero lyeth buried in tho mercy of Jhesus Christ, ye bodye of Arthur Chambro Gentleman trewe Patron of this Parish Church of Myddle, and Margarett his Wife. By her he had issue one sonno and one daughter, whiche Arthur deceased 19 August in tho yore of our Lord God 1564, whoso bodye and Soul God grant a joyful insurrection. Amon." * Haines in his list of Brasses, published in 1861 , gives us credit for having two other Brasses in our Church, which he thus describes : — I. "A man in armour, c. M90, peculiar (i.e., by a local or Warwickshire artist) inscription lost." II. "A Fragment Seven Sons (Corbet Family ?) circa 1530." I can only say I have never seen a vestige of these Brasses, and when we restored the Church many years ago, I took the greatest care that nothing of interest should be lost. I received a letter only yesterday about these missing Brasses from Mr. Mill Stephenson, who has of late been hunting up the Shropshire Brasses. He tells mo he has been to tho British Museum and endeavoured in vain to discover any traces of them. They do not appear among the drawings of the Salop Brasses taken by the Rev. E. Williams, who visited Myddje in 1706, nor are they mentioned by a Mr. Parke, who also visited Myddle at a later period ; nor does Gough mention them, and therefore he concludes, and I think rightly, that Mr. Haines was mistaken, and attributed to Myddle Church Brasses that belonged elsewhere. Throe of the old chained books still remain in tho Church, tho actual chains are gone, but the links remain on tho books. They are : — 1. Paraphrase of Erasmus, black letter, 1522. 2. Jewel's Apology, 1560. 3. Whitgift's Defence, 1574. The only other objei t of any archaeological interest in the Church is the old Chest, which I believe to be the one that existed not only in Gough's time, but long before, for in the plan that he gives of the Church, not as it was in his own time, but " anticntly," a chest is drawn, which from its shape and its three locks, that are specially marked, appears to have been a rude representation of our present chest. In tho same plan also a chancel screen is drawn, not a vestigo of which now remains. We come next to our Registors, which are very old, going back to the time of Henry VIII , tho first entry being dated Dec. 8, 1541, which will bo within three years of their first introduction. The oldest is, however, a copy, but every page is signed and certified by the Rector and Churchwardens, the former being a Mr. Ralph Kinaston, the same who offered to rebuild the tower to his own .height. From the year 1598 the Register is genuine. In the year 1553 thero is the following entry : — "Tho Regester wanteth for all tho Raino of Quoeno Mario, being 5 years." Tho second Register, which is hardly in such good preservation' as the other, bogins in 1617, and ends in 1645, from which time thero are no entries to bo found till tho year 1681. Leaving the Church, the next object of interest is the Castlo, which stands yory near it. Tho staircase turret is all that now remains of tho building X. itself, but the moat round it is still perfect, as is also a great part of the wall within the moat, which supported the Court yard, and two sets of stone steps leading down to the moat side. The exact date of the first building that was erected on this spot is unknown ; but Gough in giving a curious account of the hostility which in early times existed between the Welsh and the English, seems to suggest the origin of the Castle in the following traditions. He says: — "There was such enmity between the Britons and Saxons that the Welshmen accounted all for a lawful prize which they stole from the English, and wee have a tradition that the inhabitants of the neighbouring Townes (townships) had in every towne a piece of ground adjoining to their homes, which was mooted about with a large ditch, and fenced with a strong fence and pole, wherein they kept their cattell every night, with persons to watch them ; and that there was a light horseman maintained in every towne with a good horse sword and spear who was always ready upon the least notice to ride straight to Piatt Bridge there to meet his companions, and if they found any Welshman on this side the Piatt Bridge and the river of Perry, if they could apprehend him he was sure to be put to death. The place of execution or gallows in this lordship was on Myddle Hill, in that field formerly called the Callow tree field, now the Hill field. I have often heard that stile on Myddle Hill called the Gallow tree stile. Richard Wolph of Myddle, a very old man who died in my time, would promise to show the very place where the gallows stood." To return to the Castle, there is a Patent of the time of King Edward II., dated April 1st, 1308, allowing John Le Strange to " fortify and crenellate his Mansion of Mcdle with a wall of Stone and Lime." Gough tells us that the Lords Strange were owners of the Manor of Myddle about 420 years, and during the reign of 18 Kings, and then it passed into the Stanley Family, and then into that of the Egertons, Earls of Bridgewater. After their time Sir Humphrey Kinaston was by commission made Castle Keeper both of Myddle and lvnockin Castle His son Humphrey — who for his dissolute and riotous living was called Wild Humphrey, was for some time tenant of this Castle, and then being outlawed for debt he went and sheltered himself in a cave at Ness Cliff which is still called by his name. Gough gives the following account of Wild Humphrey's leap over the Severn. "On a time when he was got over M on ford Bridge and was on that side Severn which is next Shrewsbury, and must needs return over the Bridge, the Under Sheriff came with a considerable company of men to the Bridge (which then was made with Stone Pillars and wooden Planks) and having taken up several planks and made such a Trench as they thought no horse was able to leap over, they laid themselves in ambush — and when Wild Humphrey returned and was about to enter upon the Bridge, they rose up to apprehend him, which he perceiving put spur to his horse and riding full speed, leaped cleverly over the breach. The measure of this leap was afterwards marked out upon Knocki n Heath upon a green plot by the wayside that leads from Knockin towards Nesscliff with an H and a K cut in the ground at the end of the leap. The letters were about an ell long, and a spade graft broad and a spade graft deep. ''These letters," adds Gough, "were usually repaired yearly by Mr. Kinastone of Ruyton. I confess I have seen the letters but did not take the measure of the distance." After Wild Humphrey's time the Castle of Myddle was never inhabited but went utterly to ruin. Of the one Turret that remains at the present time, Gough says : — Part of the top of this Tower fell down in an earthquake, about the year 1688." When I first came to Myddle in 1847 the appearance of the top of the turret corresponded with Gough's account, but when the late Lord Alford visited Myddle a short time after, he gave his agent orders to preserve the Tower from getting any worse. The agent did so and at the same time crenellated the top in the manner in which it now is. There was also at that time a stone in the wall by the moat with a Coat of Arms on it in good preservation. A Lion passant, which I imagine was that of the Lords Strange. One day on taking some friends to see it, to my horror I found it had disappeared, nor for a long time could 1 discover what had become of it, till I heard it had been takon by the Agent to Ellesmoi'o to beautify his own Rockery. His successor kindly I XI restored it and it is now placed on the side of the Tower, where it can be easily seen but not easily removed. One other little object of interest I may mention and then I have done. Some 20 years ago the Gamekeeper and. his son were ferreting rabbits on the Moss Fptfm, when after digging out a ferret the boy saw something glitter in the hole and putting his hand in lie pulled out a gold ring, which I will show you presently. It got into my hands and proves to be of some interest and value. I am told by the British Museum Authorities, to whom I have shown it, that it is what is called a Serjeant's Ring, and it has on it the following appr opriate inscription — " Thenk on Mercie and- Latbe right." 1 sent it to the Lord of the Manor, but he kindly gave it up to me. Of much less interest and value is a gold Seal which a man dug up when cleaning out a ditch only a few weeks ago. Unfortunately, the spade has struck the Seal itself and damaged it considerably. It is quite time now that I came to an end. I will only say therefore, in conclusion, that if any of you should think it worth your while to pay a visit to Myddleyou will be most welcome. And "I think I can guarantee that if you will entrust yourself to my guidance — In Medio tutissimus ibis. The Rev. W. G. D. Fletcher moved a vote of thanks to Canon Egerton for his paper, lie remarked that it was one of those popular papers, some of which had appeared in the Transactions lately, and which proved most interesting to the majority of their readers. (Hear, hear.) It had been said that day that they wanted a few more members for the Society, and lie might state that the Council had tried every method to get those members. They sent circulars round to nearly every gentleman in the county, containing a full description of the Society and a full account of the papers which it published, but that did not seem to have been very successful in its results, and. he was of opinion that there was only one way of attaining the object in view, and that was by personal effort. (Hear, hear.) If they could only get 30 or 40 members they would be in a solvent state, and able to carry on without getting into debt at all. To get that number ought not to be a diflicult thing in a county like Shropshire. (Hear, hear.) He did not think that the Transactions were altogether devoid of interest. They had tried lately to have as many interesting papers as possible, and had had a good many papers of Mr. Blakeway's put in, and there would be a good many more. If each member would do his utmost to speak about the Society among his friends, he felt sure that the membership would bo increased and the Society put in a nourishing condition. (Hear, hear.) Mr. Adnitt seconded the vote of thanks, remarking that it was more than 20 years since his firm printed Cough's History of Middle, and that this edition Canon Egerton compared word by word with the original MS., a very formidable work, for winch Shropshire is deeply indebted, the original printed edition of Sir Thomas Phillipps's being thoroughly inaccurate and incomplete. The vote was unanimously accorded, and suitably acknowledged. The Rev. C. H Duinkwater observed that the Society required just such papers as the one read that day. It necessitated a good deal of work perhaps to prepare such a paper, but it was valuable because it awakened interest and frequently research on the part of xi). others, and lie hoped it would go forth to the public that they wanted locally interesting papers. (Hear, hear.) PARISH DOCUMENTS. Sir Offley Wakeman called the attention of those present who came from rural parishes to the' opportunity which would arise for looking into the ancient manuscripts connected with those parishes. As they probably knew, all manuscripts had now to be divided between the secular authorities of parishes and the ecclesiastical, and as they would have to be gone through, it would be a good oppor- tunity for seeing whether they contained anything of importance. THE FORTHCOMING VISIT OF THE PHOTOGRAPHIC CONVENTION. Mr. Burson said reference had been made to the visit of the Archaeological Institute last year, and he wished to state that there would be an equally important gathering in July next, when the Photographic Convention of Great Britain and Ireland would come to Shrewsbury ; and he desired to enlist the sympathies of gentlemen belonging to the Archaeological Society on the occasion. The photographers would exceed the archaeologists four or live times in point of numbers, and they would be glad to receive any hints or suggestions as to objects of interest in the county. (Hear, hear.) THE PROPERTY OF THE SHROPSHIRE ARCHAEO- LOGICAL AND NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY TRANSFERRED TO THE CORPORATION. A special general meeting of members of the above-named Society was held at Messrs. Adnitt and Naunton's Rooms, Shrewsbury, on Friday, March 29th, 1895. The Rev. T. Auden presided, and there were also present— the Revs. C. H. Drinkwater, W. G. D Fletcher, E. Myers, Canon Allen, Dr. Calvert, Messrs. H. W. Adnitt, H. R. H. Southam, Clement Southam, W. Burson, Sandford Corser, W. Beacall, Dovaston, aud Mr. F. Goyne (secretary) — The Chairman explained the object of the meeting, which was to consider the desirability of transferring the whole of the contents of the Museum, together with all printed and written books, the property of the Society in the Reference Library, to the Shrewsbury Corporation, as absolute owners for the use of the public. He said most of those present were awrare how that matter had arisen. There had been various delinquencies committed at the Museum lately and valuable articles lost, and the Free Library Committee very naturally felt a heavy responsibility laid upon them. It was, therefore, thought desirable to make arrangements for the better custody of the articles in the Museum. The Council of the Archaeological Society, after discussing the question of the guardianship of the Museum, felt that Xlll. the desirable step to take was that which he had already referred to. When the Museum was transferred from the Society to the Corporation, certain trustees were appointed, in whom the property was vested for the time being. When the} were empowered to treat with the Corporation, the trustees reserved to themselves — or the Society reserved for them — the power to take charge of the articles in the Museum if the Corporation did not properly care for them. They never for a moment thought that would occur, and it had not occurred, for the Corporation were most anxious to look after the articles in the Museum. It had, however, been felt for some little time by the members of the Council and the Free Library Committee that this sort of dual ruling of the Museum was not altogether a desirable thing, inasmuch as, like all other dual management, it did not work absolutely well. So at the last meeting of the Council of the Society they arrived at a unanimous resolution that it was desirable, in the interests of the Museum and the interests of the public, to transfer absolutely to the Corporation the property of the Society, it being understood, of course, that it was for the use of the public. He therefore proposed the following resolution : — "That the whole of the contents of the Museum, together with all printed and written books, the property of the Society now in the Reference Library, be transferred to the Corporation as absolute owners for the use of the public." — This was seconded by Mr. Dovaston. — Mr. Myers : I suppose there is no question that the Town Council will accept them ? — The Chairman : No ; practically they are theirs now. — The resolution was carried unanimously. THE ANNUAL EXCURSION. Turn Annual Excursion bf thq Shropshire Archaeological and Natural IIIM.Mv N«HJi*M\Y ioult hitlVO on TluuMday, August 8 th, 1805. The \m% Ui Iho oouulv ohosou fur invowl tgut ion this year was the district lying oust of Ludlow, and the members who joined the excursion met at (hat station nt 11 6 on Mio morning in question, the majority having travelled from Shrewsbury by the train then due. Anions the party were the Rev. T. Audeii, F.S.A. (Chairman of the Council)^ who acted as guide, Rev. C. H. Drinkwater, Rev. 0. M. Fcilden, Rev. J. Neale, Mr J. Dovaston and Miss Dovaston, Mr. H. H. Hughes and Miss Hughes, Mr. Folliott Sandford and Mrs. Sandford, Miss Hutton, (Cape Town), Miss Corser, Miss Hawkins and Miss E. Hawkins, Mr! Clement Southam, Mr. C. Fortey, and the Secretary, Mr. F. Coyne. From Ludlow Station, where carriages awaited them, the party pro- ceeded to Bitterley Court, where the hospitable owner, Rev. John Walcot, was awaiting them with a party of friends. The first visit was made to the church, of which the salient points were explained by Rev. — Burton. Bitterley is one of the wido parishes of the county whose history goes back to Saxon times, the Domesday Survey XlV. bearing witness to the existence of a church and priest before the Norman conquest. The present edifice has possibly incorporated in its walls fragments of early work, and the font (engraved in Ey ton's Antiquities of Shropshire) is a fine specimen of the tub shape, of which so many exist in the county, and date back to Saxon or Early Norman times. The church, however, has been added to and partly rebuilt in modern days, so that it is difficult to judge of the original period of erection. It contains the upper part of a fine oak screen of 15th century workmanship and an oak chest of early type. The tower is of characteristic Shropshire form, and contains three bells which are said to belong to the reign of King Edward I. From the church the party proceeded to the churchyard, where the cross still stands in its completeness. It is of decorated design with very elegant details, and on the whole is perhaps one of the most perfect in England. The treasures of Bitterley Court itself next engaged the attention of the visi- tors, and these are of the greatest possible interest, as well as extremely numerous. Among them are original pedigrees of the Walcot family dating from the Heralds' visitations, a christening robe of 16th century work, valuable letters and other MSS. mainly relating to the period of the Civil War in which Humphrey Walcot played a conspicuous part, but including a letter of Judge Jeffreys and others of later date, and one relic which is in some respects the most interesting of all, namely, half of the cloak worn by Charles I. on the scaffold, and given with bloodstains still upon it to William Walcot, who attended him in his last hours as page. These and other objects received in turn the attention of those present, and the time was all too short to examine them, or to discuss the refreshments for the body which Mr. Walcot had added to these refreshments for the mind. The feelings of the whole party were expressed to him in a few wrords of hearty thanks from Mr. Auden, and the brakes being re-entered members made their way to Whitton Court. Here a similar wrelcome awaited them from Miss Mills and her sister, who, with the assistance of Mr. S. C Whitefoord, spared no pains to show them whatever was of interest both inside and outside. The house presents some architectural problems difficult to solve. One side of the inner court yard is half timbered, and is a rather elaborate specimen of such work, probably dating from about the middle of the lGth century. A solitary fragment of oak on the opposite side shows that it was originally similar ; but it is difficult to assign a date to the wall of the house which connects these two sides. Perhaps the safest conjecture is that the stonework of which it is composed is part of an older edifice incorporated, and partly remodelled, when the present front of the house was added. This took place, as appears from dates upon it, in the years which followed 1630, and is an extremely good type of the brick work of the period. Covered as it now largely is with creepeis, its quaint gables, its elaborate chimneys and its mullioned windows are a picture to delight the heart of the photographer as well as interest the antiquarian. The wainscoting which ornaments almost every room of tho interior is of various dates, the bulk of it contemporary XV. with the front of the house, but some of it considerably earlier. There is also a very elaborate plaster ceiling of the early part of the 17th century, and the room in which this occurs contains some fine tapestry of apparently the same date. When these and other objects had received due attention, the party gathered in the old hall of the house to partake of the tea to which they had been kindly invited. In dispensing this very refreshing and acceptable meal, the hostess was assisted by her nieces, the Misses Whitefoord, who by their diligent attention to the wants of their guests made it doubly pleasant, and they were fittingly included in the expression of thanks with which the visit was brought to a close. After a short glance in passing at Whitton Church, of which the lower part of the tower and some of the windows show Norman work- manship, the party made their way to Burford, Mr. S. C. Whitefoord kindly accompanying them. At the church they were met by the Rector, Rev. E. C. L McLaughlin, who explained to them the objects of interest in it. The church itself has been so elaborately restored that it can hardly be described any longer as an old church at all, and though the monuments have to some extent been subjected to the same process, they are of very .great interest. They include a recumbent elhgy of stone to the memory of Princess Elisabeth, daughter of John of Gaunt, who married Sir John Cornwall, and died 1426, and one of wood to another member of the Cornwall family, besides a brass of 14th century date, and an incised slab of lead or some similar metal used instead of brass, but the most interesting memorial is a large triptych to the memory of Edmund Cornwall, Baron of Burford, who was Sheriff of Shropshire in 1580. The triptych bears the signature of the painter, Melchior Salaboss, with the date 1588, and is one of the very few ancient specimens remaining in England. It had been planned for the party to pay a visit on the way home to CaynhamCamp, but by the time that Burford Church had been in- spected it was not only too late to attempt this, but the clouds which had been gathering for some time past burst into a heavy shower, which lasted the rest of the afternoon. Ludlow Station was reached about 5-45, and in spite of the drawback of the rain on the return drive, it was universally agreed that the expedition had been one of the most interesting and successful excursions made by the Society in recent years. XVI, LIST OF MEMBERS, 1895, Adnitt, Mr. H. W., Shrewsbury Allen, Vory Rev. Canon, Belmont, Shrewsbury Auclon, Rev. T., M,A., F S.A., Condover Vicarage, Shrewsbury Bradford, Right Hon. Earl of, Lord Lieutenant of Shropshire {President) Brownlow, Right Hon. Earl, Belton, Grantham Barnard, Right Hon. Lord, Raby Castle, Durham Baldwyn-Childe, Rev Prebendary, M.A., J. P., Kyre Park, Tenbury Barnes, Thomas, Esq., The Quinta, Chirk Barnes, Colonel J. R., J. P., Brookside, Chirk Beaeall, W., Esq., J. P., Sunfield, Shrewsbury Benthall, E., Esq , Glantwreh, Ystalyfcra, Swansea Valo Beresford, Robert de la Poer, Esq., M.D., Oswestry Bowdler, W., Esq., Penybont, Sutton Lane, Shrewsbury Bridgeman, The Hon. and Rev. Canon, M.A , J. P., The Hall, Wigan Bridgeman, The Hon. and Rev. J., M.A., J. P., Weston-undcr-Lizard, Shifnal Browne, W. Lyon, Esq, J. P., Ashley House, Shrewsbury Burd, Rev. Prebendary, M.A , Chirbury Vicarage, Salop Bulkcley-Owen, Rev. T. M., B.A., J.P., Tedsmore Hall, West Fclton Burson, Mr. W., Whitehall Street, Shrewsbury Burton, Rev. R. Lingon, Little Aston Vicarage, Sutton Coldiield, Birmingham Burton, G. R. Lingen, Esq., Whitton Hall, Westbury Calvert, E., Esq., LL.D., Shrewsbury Cavan, James, Esq., M.A., Eaton Mascott Hall, Shrewsbury Chance, A. F., Esq., M.A., The Schools, Kingsland Cholmondeley, Rev. R. H., M.A., Hodnet Rectory Churchill, Rev. C. J. S., M.A., The Schools, Shrewsbury Clark, G. T., Esq., F.S.A., Talygarn, Llantrissant, Pontyclown, R.S.O. Clarke, Rev. J. H. Courtney, M.A., Tong Vicarage, Shifnal Clay, J. Cecil, Esq., Market Drayton Clayton, Rev. Prebendary, M.A., The Rectory, Ludlow Clowes, Rev. Albert, M.A , Clec S. Margaret, Bromfield, Salop Cock, Alfred, Esq., Q.C., 8, Kensington Park Gardens, W. Cock, James, Esq., Kingsland, Shrewsbury Colville, H. K., Esq., Bellaport, Market Drayton Corbet, Sir W, 0., Bart.,. Acton Reynald, Shrewsbury Corficld, Liont.-Col. F. Channcr, J.P., Ormondo Fields, Codnor, Derby- xvii. Corser, G. Sandford, Esq., Shrewsbury- Cranage, D. H. S., Esq., M.A., Wellington, Salop Corbett, John, Esq., M.P., Impney, Droitwich Davis, Rev. J,, The College, Cleobury Mortimer Dovaston, Adolphus, Esq., Twyford, Sunnysido Road, Ealing- London, W. Dovaston, J., Esq., West Felton Drinkwater, Rev. C. H., M.A., St. George's Vicarage, Shrewsbury Duignan, W. H., Esq., St. Ronans, Walsall Egerton, Rev. Canon, M.A., Middle Rectory, Shrewsbury Egerton, Rev. W. H., M.A., The Rectory, Whitchurch, Salop Eyton, T. Slaney, Esq., D.L., J. P., Walford Hall, Baschurch Feilden, Rev. 0. M., M.A., Frankton Rectory, Oswestry Fletcher, Rev. W. G. Dimock, M.A., F.S.A., St. Michael's Vicarage Shrewsbury Foley, P. H., Esq., M.A., F.S.A., Prestwood, Stourbridge, Worcester shire Fortey, Charles, Esq , Ludlow, Salop Fisher, Ed., Esq., F.S.A. Scot., Abbotsbury, Newton Abbot George, A. Brooke, Esq., Dodington, Whitchurch, Salop Gill, Arthur, Esq., Preston Street, Shrewsbury Gough, Fred. H., Esq., Chilton Moor Vicarage, Fence Houses, Durham Greene, H. D., Esq., Q.C., M.P., The Grove, Craven Arms Gregory, G. W., Esq., Wyle Cop, Shrewsbury Griffin, Harcourt, Esq., J. P., Pell Wall, Market Drayton Griffiths, George, Esq., Weston, Shifnal Guildhall Library, London, E C. — C. Welch, Esq. Greensill, Frank, Esq., 4, Windsor Terrace, Douglas, Isle of Man Harlech, Right Hon. Lord, Brogyntyn, Oswestry Hawkesbury, Right Hon. Lord, F.S.A., Cocklode, Ollerton, Newark Hall, Rev. G. T., M.A., The Schools, Shrewsbury Harding, W. E., Esq., Shrewsbury Hawkins, Miss, St. Mary's Court, Shrewsbury Herbert, Hon. R. C, M.A., D.L., J.P., Orleton, Wellington, Salop Heywood-Lonsdale, A. P., Esq., B.A., D.L., J. P., Shavington, Market Drayton Hignett, T. H., Esq., Oswestry Hodges, E., Esq Edgmond, Newport, Salop How, T. M., Esq., Near well, Shrewsbury Howells, T. Middleton, Esq., Highfield, Shrewsbury Hughes, Edward, Esq., 37, Wrexham Fcchan, Wrexham Hughes, W. If., Esq., G, Telford Avenue, Strcatham Hill, London,, S.W. XVlll Humphreys-Owen, A. C, Esq., M.A., M.P., J.P., D.L., Garthmyl, Mont gomeryshire Jones, Miss Edith A., Shelton House, Shrewsbury Jones, H., Esq., 1, Church Court, Clement's Lane, London, E.C. Jones, J. Parry, Esq., Beechfield, Oswestry Juson, Mrs , Monklands, Shrewsbury Kenyon, Right Hon. Lord, Gredington, Whitchurch, Salop Kenyon, R. Lloyd, Esq., M.A., J. P., Pradoe, West Felton, Oswestry King, Roff, Esq., Islington, Shrewsbury Kittermaster, Rev. F. W., M.A., Bayston Hill Vicarage, Shrewsbury Lichfield, Right Rev. The Lord Bishop of, The Palace, Lichfield Lane, Cecil N., Esq., C.M.G., J.P., Winston Hall, Albrighton, Wolver- hampton Langley, Alfred F., Esq., Golding, Peterston Super Ely, Cardiff Leighton, Stanley, Esq., M.A., M.P., F.S.A., Sweeney Hall, Oswestry Leslie, Henry, Esq., J. P., Bryntanat, LlansantlTraid, R.S.O., Mont- gomeryshire Lewis, Mr. Henry, Oswald Road, Oswestry Lloyd, Ven. Archdeacon, M.A., Edgmond, Newport, Salop Mainwaring, S. Kynaston, Esq., D.L., J. P., Otcley, Ellesmcre McMichael, J. W., Esq., Bridgnorth Minshall, Philip H., Esq., J. P., Bronwylfa, Oswestry Morris, S. M., Esq., Swan Hill Court, Shrewsbury Moss, Rev. Prebendary, M.A., The Schools, Shrewsbury Myers, Rev. E., F.G.S., The Parsonage, Shrewsbury Naunton, Mr. W. W., Shrewsbury Newman, H. F., Esq., High Street, Shrewsbury Norton, Rev. F. C, Ditchling Vicarage, Sussex Oswell, A. E. LLoyd, Esq., Shrewsbury •Oswestry Free Library Powis, Right Hon. Earl of, Powis Castle, Welshpool Peele, E. C , Esq , Kingsland, Shrewsbury Pelham, Rev. A. Thursby, M.A., Cound Rectory, Shrewsbury Phillips, Richard, Esq., Bradford Street, Shrewsbury Phillips, W., Esq., F.L.S., J.P., Canonbury, Shrewsbury Pickering, T. E., Esq,, M.A., The Schools, Shrewsbury Poole, T. Frank, Esq., Kingsland, Shrewsbury Potts, E. B , Esq., Broseley Purton, Rev. Ralph C, B.A., Wcthorham, St. Tudy, R.S 0., Cornwall xix Robinson, Brooke, Esq., M.P., Barford House, Warwick Rogers, Henry Exell, Esq., Shrewsbury Rowland, G. J., Esq., 14, Parkdale, Wolverhampton Rouse-Boughton, Sir C. H., Bart., D.L , J.P., Downton Hall, Ludlow Sutherland, His Grace the Duke of, Lilleshall Salt, G. M., Esq., Shrewsbury Salter, J. B., Esq., Castle Street, Shrewsbury Salwey, T. J., Esq., The Cliff, Ludlow Sandford, Humphrey, Esq., M.A., J.P., The Isle, Shrewsbury Sandford, Folliott, Esq , Belmont, Shrewsbury Sec. Science and Art Department, London S.W. Severn Valley Field Club Shrewsbury, Right Rev. The Bishop of, Quarry House, Shrewsbury Sitwell, Willoughby Hurt, Esq., Ferney Hall, Craven Aims Smith, H. Percy, Esq., Tong Priory, near Shifnal Smith, F. Rawdon, Esq., Eastfield, Ironbridge Southam, Herbert R. H. Esq., Sutton Lane, St. Giles, Shrewsbury Southam, S. C, Esq., Elmhurst, Shrewsbury Southam, T., Esq., J. P., The Hollies, Shrewsbury Sparrow, Arthur, Esq., F.S.A., D.L., J.P., Preen Manor, Shrewsbury Spaull, W. H., Esq., J. P., Oswestry Stanier, F,, Esq , J. P., Peplow Hall, Market Drayton Stokes, Rev. Hudlestone, M.A., Stapleton Rectory, Salop Swainson, Rev. J. G, M.A., Wistanstow Rectory, Craven Arms Taylor, R., Esq., J. P., Abbey House, Shrewsbury Thursfield, T. H., Esq., J. P., Barrow, Broseley Timmis, Percy Freeman, Esq., Dry ton, Wroxeter Vaughan, H. F. J., Esq., B.A., 30, Edwardes Square, Kensington, London Vane, Hon. and Rev. Gilbert H. F., M.A., The Rectory, Wem Venables, R. G., Esq., B.A., J.P., The Lodge, Ludlow Wakeman, Sir Omey, Bart., M.A., D.L., J.P., Yeaton-Peverey Walker, C. C, Esq., J.P., Lilleshall Old Hall, Salop Walton, F. R. B., Esq., 19, Crescent Place, Shrewsbury Wateridge, F, W., Esq., Belmont, Shrewsbury Watts, W. W., Esq., M.A., F.G.S., 28, Jermyn Street, London, S.W. Weyman, H. T., Esq., Ludlow, Salop Whitcombe, Robert H., Esq., Bewdley Williams, Philip, Esq,, J. P., Hinstock Hall, Market Drayton Williams-Freeman, Captain, Ivy House, Meole Brace Williams- Vaughan, E., Esq., Broom Hall, Oswestry Woods, Sir Albert W., C.B., F.S.A., Garter King of Arms, Queen Victoria Street, London XX. Woodall, Mr. E., Oswestry and Border Cowities Advertizer, Oswestry Wright, Philip, Esq., J.P., Mellington Hall, Churchstoko Whittingham, E., Esq., Newport, Salop HONORARY MEMBER. Randall, Mr. J , F.G.S., Madeley, Salop Members are requested to notify any change of residence, or error of description, to the Secrotary, Mr. F. Goyne, "Dogpole, Shrewsbury. SOCIETIES IN COMMUNICATION WITH THIS SOCIETY. Archaeological Section of Birmingham and Midland Institute. Cambrian Archaeological Association. Cumberland and Westmoreland Archaeological and Antiquarian Society Derbyshire Archaeological Society. East Riding Antiquarian Society, Yorkshire. Essex Field Club. Folk-Lore Society. Glasgow Archaeological Society. Historic Society of Lancashire and Cheshire. Kent Archaeological Society. Leicestershire Architectural and Archaeological Society. Powys-Land Club, Montgomeryshire. Royal Archaeological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. Society of Antiquaries of London. Society of Antiquaries of Newcastle-on-Tyne. Society of Antiquaries of Scotland. Somerset Archaeological Society. Surrey Archaeological Society. Sussex Archaeological Society. Worcester Diocesan Archaeological Society. William Salt Archaeological Society, Stafford. Yorkshire Archaeological and Topographical Association. Bodleian Library. British Museum. Natural History Department of British Museum. 5» 3 o o o o © © oc o © © O O «H © 1ft o © © •-+> © O 10 CO fH >c 00 CM CO • 43 : c o o 3 :<*! .— I 43 sS ^ G serf 's M 80 C as Ui •r< fn CO H CO co CL co CD 0.) pq : : ft * & o ho < C ci ' ©* l ^ 8 CO 43 . 03 bps £ ©43 . o « > 0 qj 03 03 COPStf ;° il ©V r^ : § 1 8 :|.p o £3 S O co ,© o : < 03 5C4-J Mi toro § |4I : 3 co 53 • qq «! : a © d o . 43 CO T5 M S4 cj 03 Ski CO CO o o Ph Pw. 0 d o o b . CO q 03 x< QQ a 00 U ci c to CO © - © co © to !£> CD © © lO CI O IO © r-t O O ci co © g _H o - .2 © 03 JO Xi N CO • 2 x d 2 e rrt 5 "3 S 1 o _g 3 s bog g ^CO a.* o © 03 ^ o 3 ^rJ1m co co THE MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOR LUDLOW. By HENRY T. WEYMAN. The Parliamentary representation of the Borough of Ludlow appears to have escaped the notice of those who have handed down to us so much that is interesting and instructive in its past history. The list of the Bailiffs of the town appears in Wrights History, that of the Rectors in Mr. Olive's, but nowhere do we find a record of those who have, in the four hundred years during which Ludlow has returned Members to Parliament, represented her in the chief Council of the kingdom. The list of such members appears, however, to be well worthy of record, containing as it does the names of many men who in their day and generation have won their way to the front in many of the departments of the State. Ludlow in the latter part of the 15th and in the 16th and 17th centuries was the seat of the Council of the Marches of Wales, and the residence of the Lord President of that Council, as well as of the Prince of Wales, so that it is natural to find amongst its Parlia- mentary representatives the names of many eminent men connected with the Council, and of high legal luminaries. Ludlow, among other representatives scarcely less noticeable, has sent to Parliament a Speaker of the House of Commons (Sir Job Charlton), two Lord Chief Justices of the King's Bench (Sir Edward Herbert and Sir Robert Raymond), a Commissioner of the Great Seal in Lord Raymond, at least five Chief Justices of Vol. VII., 2nd S. A 2 MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOR LUDLOW Chester (whose jurisdiction included the district covered by the Court of the Marches), seven Judges of the High Court of Justice, two such prominent citizens as Sir Josiah Child and Colonel Silas Titus, and distinguished soldiers in the 2nd Marquis of Northampton, who fell while gallantly leading the Royal troops in Staffordshire in 1642, Edward, Lord Clive, who received the thanks of both Houses of Parliament for his services in the Mahratta war at the commencement of this century, and his descendant, General Sir Percy Egerton Herbert. It is not proposed to enter at all on the general history of Ludlow, or to trespass on ground which has been appropriated by -far abler chroniclers, but an effort will be made to confine this paper strictly to the Par- liamentary representation of the borough, and those who have been from time to time returned as her members. Ludlow first appeared as a Borough in 29 Edward I., 1300 (Merre wether's Boroughs), but did not return members to Parliament until Edward the Fourth's reign. In the Wars of the Roses, Ludlow supported the cause of Picharcl, Duke of York (who was the then owner of Ludlow Castle) , and after his death gave great assistance to his son, Edward Mortimer, Earl of March, who was residing at his Castle of Wigmore. When Edward, Earl of March, ascended the throne of England after the battle of Mortimer's Cross as Edward IV., he was not slow to acknowledge the assistance he had received from his own town, and in 1461 he granted to Ludlow its first Charter of Incorporation, in which he recited as the motives for this mark of Ins royal favour, "The good and faithful services which the well beloved faithful and liege burgesses of the Town of Ludlow had done in aid of recovering the right of the Crown in the gre^it hazard of their lives, and of (he rapines, plunders, oppression and g'ri^vanc^s they had suflfepd, &e.M By this charter, dated 1,461, the privilege of returning two members to Parliament was granted to the town, but. MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOR LUDLOW. 3 for some unexplained reason no writ1 was issued for the return of members, and none were returned until the year 1472, from which date until the year 1885, when Ludlow as a Parliamentary Borough ceased to exist, there was a continual representation in the House of Commons. It is not certain who were the persons who in the earliest period of Ludlow's Parliamentary representation returned the members or exercised the franchise. The Charter of Edward IV. states that " The Bur- gesses of the Town of Ludlow and their successors for ever shall and may elect from among themselves or others two Burgesses for the Borough aforesaid to come to the Parliament of us and of our heirs, &c, &c, &c." How this was at first interpreted is doubtful, but it is clear from the Corporation Minute Books, which from the year 1590 still exist, that between the years 1G0O and 1678 " Burgesses of the Parliament" were elected solely by the Corporation, or as they were then styled, " the 12 and 25." The records of these elections can be found in such Minute Books. In 1614 the Corpora- tion went even further and resolved, " It is at this day ordered with the full assent of this Company that from henceforth the 2 Burgesses of the Parliament shall be elected out of the number of the 12 and 25 Councillors and Capital Burgesses of this town and none other persons to be employed in that service at any time hereafter, which said order is made per- manent and perpetual according to the liberties and statutes of this realm in that case made and provided." The resolution does not, however, appear to have been acted upon very consistently, as in May, 1614, only a few months after it was passed, we find the record of the election u as burgess of the Parliament/' of Bobert Lloyd, Esquire, Gentleman, Sewer to the 1 Since this was written one entry has been discovered in the Ludlow Accounts for 1467-8, from which it would appear that a writ for the eloction of members was received in that year, but no members soom to liavo been electod in obedience to the writ. 4 MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOR LUDLOW. Queen's Most Excellent Majestie," who was not one of the select twelve and twenty-five. 11th May, 161Jh At this day Robert Lloyd, Esq., Gent., Sewer to the Queen's Most Excellent Majesty, for good causes this Company moving is elected Burgess to the Parliament for this town in the place of Mr. Bailiff Berry, by virtue of his Majesty's Writ to the Sheriff of the County directed and by virtue of a Mandate from the said Sheriff to the Bailiffs adwarded the said Robert Lloyd is therefore this day ordered by this Company to give his attendance for this Town with Sir Henry Townshend, Knight, the other Burgess for the same Town, for his Majesty's service in his High Court of Parliament now holden without any allowance for the same, any former order heretofore made to the contrary notwithstanding for this time and Parliament only. In 1661 there was a petition against the election of Serjeant Timothy Littleton on the ground that the choice of Parliamentary representatives lay with the select number of 12 Aldermen and 25 Common Coun- sellors only, when it was resolved " that the right of election was in the Common Burgesses resiant," as well as in the 12 and 25, and that Sergeant Littleton was duly elected. In 1689 the right of election was thoroughly threshed out upon a petition by the defeated candidates Fitton Gerard and Francis Lloyd, against the return of Thomas Hammer and William Gower, which petition alleged that " Lord Chancellor JefTrys had extorted from the town the surrender of the Charter of Edward IV. and of the powers of electing Burgesses, &c, whereupon James II. re-incorporated the said town, but conferred the election of Members of Parliament on the 12 and 25, and that Francis Charlton assumed Mayorship, and by combination with the Sheriff proceeded to the election of members by the new Corporation men and about 28 new Burgesses, and had returned his own brother-in- law, Thomas ITanmer and William Gower, though the petitioners were on the same day fairly chosen by the unanimous consent of those qualified under the old charter.' ' MEMBERS OF* PARLIAMENT FOR LUDLOW. 5 This petition was, as usual, referred to a Committee, and eventually in 1690 it was resolved that the Charter of James II. was illegal and void, and Messrs. Hanmer and Gower were unseated. This decision made it clear that the right of election still lay with the Common Burgesses resident within the Borough. It was then laid down that the sons of burgesses and those that married the daughters of burgesses had a right to be made burgesses, but must demand it by petition. Apparently from the said year 1690 the right of election was exercised by the resident Common Burges- ses, who at first appear to have been numerous, as in 1727 upwards of 700 actually voted. However, the numbers gradually dwindled down, and at the commencement of the present century the electors were very few, as we learn from Felton's Ladlow, 1811, u Above 65 burgesses are resident here, by whom the members are returned," and from his larger edition of 1821, " Here are nearly 300 male housekeepers, whose houses are valued at JU0 a year and upwards, who have no vote in the election of Members of Parliament. " In a Parliamentary report for 1832 it was stated that the greatest number of electors who had polled within the then last 30 years was 16. So it remained until the Reform Act of 1832, when the old close boroughs and ancient elections by " free burgesses" only were abolished, and an uniform franchise was fixed for all boroughs alike. It is curious to note that payment of Parliamentary representatives, which is a tenet of modern Radicalism, is no new doctrine, but is rather a return to old customs. The Records of Ludlow^ contain many allusions to the payment of the members in the 16th and 17th centuries, the rate of allowance being the uniform one of two shillings per day for the time occupied in Parliamentary duties. The same rate prevailed in the City of Here- ford, and a somewhat larger one in Shrewsbury. Occasionally, sometimes at the instance of the members MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOR LUDLOW. themselves, sometimes as a condition of election, the borough was freed from any claim for expenses. This is specially shown in the case of Mr. Aston, M.P., in 1654 and 1656 ; in the first year he was allowed 2s. a day, in the last he was elected "to go at his own expense," and it is curious to note in the Church- wardens' Accounts that on this occasion the Church bells were rung. It is worthy of note that (as will be seen from the subjoined list) at least five of Ludlow's members, viz., William Foxe and his sons Charles Foxe and Edmund Foxe, John Bradshaw and Sir John Pryce, all obtained considerable properties from the dissolution of the Monasteries. The list, unfortunately, is not complete, the Members of the Parliament between 1495 and 1515 being omitted, most of the constituencies throughout the country being in the same position. Ilesort has been had to the Records of the House of Commons, the Hecord Office, the British Museum, and the Borough Records, but without success. Thanks to the Ludlow Bailiffs' Accounts, Minute Books, and other local documents, several names have been filled in which are blank in the Plouse of Commons returns ; but it is a source of un- availing regret to the compiler of the list that he has been unable to present a complete record from Edward IVs first writ to the extinction of the borough as a Parliamentary unit in 1885, An effort has been made to trace something of the personality of each member, and though in this respect mistakes may unwittingly have been made, no effort has been spared to make the notes as well as the list a true and faithful record of those who for upwards of four centuries have represented the Parliamentary Borough of Ludlow in the Council of the nation. The writer draws largely upon the information con- tained in various Shropshire and Ludlow books,especially Wright's History of Ludlow, Mr. Clive's Documents of the Lords Marchers, and the Transactions of the Shrop- MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOE, LUDLOW. 7 shire Archaeological Society, as well as Mr. Foster's Oxoniensis Alumni, and other like works. He has received kindly help from the Recorder of Ludlow (Mr. Greene, Q.C., M.P.), and others, but he especially desires to acknowledge the invaluable assistance he has received from Mr. W. Duncomb Pink, to whom the public are indebted for the discovery of the members of the lost Parliament of 1491, and without whose help the following list would never have been made so complete. LUDLOW M.P.'S. 1472-5. (1) PETRUS BEAUPIE and (2) JOHANNES SPARCHEFORD. Elected 17 Sept., 1472. (1) Petrus, i.e., Piers Beaupie, was Cofferer to King Edward IV., an office in those days of considerable importance. In the Act of Resumption, 1464, it was provided that nothing therein should pre- judice "any grant by us under our letters patent of the Earldom of March to our servant Piers Beaupie, Esquire." Mr. Beaupie was a Barrister-at-Law, and was probably the first Recorder, as well as the first M.P. for Ludlow. He was certainly Recorder 14G6-1474, and in that capacity received a salary of £1 Gs. 8d. per annum. He founded a Chantry at the altar of St. Mary and St. Gabriel the Arch- angel in the nave of Ludlow Church, and was buried there, but all trace of his tomb has long since disappeared. In the deed of settle- ment of Hosyer's Charity, dated 8 December, 1486, we find a direction inserted that "Six of the best voiced singing children on every Sunday and other Festival day immediately after the Mass of our Lady done shall go in their surplices unto the tomb of Piers Beaupie Esquire, in the said Church, and there say for the souls of the said Piers Beaupie and Agnes his wife certain Psalms and Collects." The endowment of Beaupie's Chantry was in 1535 valued at £7 16s. Od. per annum, arising from lands and tenements. Churchyard, the Shropshire poet, whose grandfather lived in Ludlow, and was buried in Ludlow Church, calls Beaupie "a great ritch and verteous man, he made another Chantrie," and says : — Yet Beaupy must be named, good reason why, For he bestowed great charge before he dyde To keep poore men & now his bones doth lye Full near the Fonte upon the foremoste side Thus in those days the poore was looked unto The rich was glad to fling their wealth away So that their ;dmefe the poore some good might do In poore mens boxe who doth his treasure lay Shall Undo agaitio tenfold for one ho leaves Or elso my hope and knowledgo me deceives. 8 MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOR LUDLOW. Piers Beaupie'fi will was proved in the prerogative Court of Canter- bury in 1480. (2) John Sparcheford was Bailiff of Ludlow 1466. He and the succeeding member, Richard Sherma'n, are both mentioned in a deed dated 20 Edward IV., which was a lease for 300 years of Portman Meadow (lying between the Corvo and Fishmore Brook) from the Palmers' Guild to John Sparcheford. 1477-8. (3) RICARDUS SHERMAN (Armiger) and (4) THOMAS STEVENES. Elected 1 January., 1477-8. (3) Richard Sherman was one of the executors of John Hosyer, and a party to the deed of 1486, in which the tomb of the first member, Piers Beaupie, is mentioned. As first trustee of Hosyer's Almshouse he has great claims on the kindly remembrance of Ludlow. He was Custos of the Palmers' Guild 1487, 1488, and 1489. It may be of interest to know that he lived in the corner houso in Dinliam (occupied so long by the Rev. Robert Meyricke), opposite the Chapel of St. Thomas of Canterbury. He died in 1495. His grand-daughter married Richard Vaughan, who was "Solicitor" of Queen Elizabeth in the Marches of Wales. (4) Thomas Stevenes was Bailiff in 1465 and in 1476. In the latter year he was the successor of John Hosyer, the well-known founder of the much appreciated Hosyer's Almshouse at Ludlow, of whom his fellow member, Richard Sherman, was one of the executors. 1482-1487. There are no returns for these years in the House of Commons or the Record Office. A search in Ludlow Record Room has also been fruitless. 1491. (a) RICHARD LYTTLETON and THOMAS PRATTE. (a) Richard Lyttleton was the second son of Sir Thomas Lyttle ton, who was Judgo of the Court of Common Pleas 1466, Knight of the Bath 1475, a celebrated logal author, and died 1481. Richard Lyttleton himself was a barrister, and ancestor of the present Lord Hatherton. Richard Lyttleton's mother was Joan widow of Sir Philip Chctwynd, and daughter of Sir William Burley, of Broncroft Castle, Shropshire, and Speaker of the House of Commons. Ho inherited extensive estates, including, doubtless, Broncroft Castle from his mother, and hence his connection with Ludlow. 1495-1515. No records for these years exist. 1523, April. It would appear from an entry in the Ludlow Bail ills' Accounts that William Foxo and John Cother (5 and G below) wore members for Ludlow in this short Parliament, but it is open to doubt, MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOR LUDLOW. 9 1529-36. (5) WILLIAM FOXE and (6) JOHN COTTIER. (5) William Foxe was the founder of one of the most important and influential families of his own and several succeeding generations in tho neighbourhood of Ludlow. Ho i"s described as "de St. John's Ludlow." Two of his sons were M.IVs for Ludlow. His son Charles was Secretary of the Council of the Marches and Sheriff of Shropshire; two grandsons and one great-grandson were knighted, and were members of the Council of the Marches. The following among other estates appear to have belonged to this family at the end of the 16th and early part of the 17th centuries, viz., Bromfield (including Oakly Park), Caynham, Stoke, Whitton, Greet, Ludford, Steventon, Whitch- cote, Gwernoga (Montgomeryshire), Adforton, Pedwardine, besides considerable property in tho town of Ludlow. They also acquired St. Giles' Hospital, Ludford, St. John's Hospital, St. Leonard's, and tho White Friars in Ludlow, and Bromfield Priory, so that they must have possessed enormous wealth and influence. In the north aislo of Ludford Church is a tomb of the member, William Foxe, as having " founded this aisle and re-edified the alms- house of St. Giles, being decayed." He was descended from John Foxe of Knighton, who was slain in the war with Owen Glyndwr. William Foxe married Jane, daughter of Richard Downe of Ludlow. He became Alderman of Ludlow 1525, and was certainly M.P. up to 1534, for there aro entries in tho Bailiffs' Accounts of that year, "To Mr. Foxe at his going to Parliament a bottel of Muscatel," and again, " Item more paid to William Foxe of this sum when he went to the Parliament Anno 26 Hen. VIII. by Mr. Rogers 40 shillings." He died in 1551, was buried in Ludford Church, and his will was proved in the same year. J (6) John Cotuuji was Bailiff of Ludlow 1511 and 1521. He bore a name of frequent occurrence in tho Ludlow Records and papers of jthose days. 1536. WILLIAM FOXE and JOHN COTHER. There is no return for this year in either the Record Office or the House of Commons, but various entries in the ^accounts of the Eailiffs of Ludlow for the year 1538 leave no doubt that Messrs. Foxe and Cotber were the members for Ludlow in this Parliament. No Christian names are, however, given, and as there were several of both names in Ludlow, there is no way of defining them with certainty, but there is little doubt that they were either William Foxe and John Cother, the same representatives as in the previous Parliament, or possibly William Foxe and a Thomas Cother, who was Bailiff in 1537. YoL VII., 2nd S. B 10 MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOll LUDLOW; 1539-1540. (7) CHARLES FOXE and (8) THOMAS WHEELER. Here again there is no return in either the House of Commons or the Record Office, but on' referring to the Bailiffs' Accounts for 1540 there is no difficulty in ascertaining that the above were the members. The following entries appear : — 'Paid to Mr. Wheeler on his first going to London to the Parliament 53/4." " Item more paid to Mr. Wheeler in part of £3 10s. Od. for the house is in debt for the Burgesses expenses." " Item paid to Mr. Charles Foxe for the last pro- rogation of Parliament 13/4." (7) Charles Foxe was the second son of William Foxe (No. 5 above). He purchased the Priory of Hromfickl, and is described in the Register there as " Right Worshipful. n He attained great power and estate, but appears from the various incidents which have been handed down, to have been of a somewhat troublesome nature. In 1537 a grant was made to him and his brother and afterwards fellow M.P. Edmund Foxe " in survivorship of the reversion of the office of Clerk of the "Council in the Marches of Wales, now held by Thomas Hakluyt in "as full manner as Thomas Hakluyt or Henry Knight, or any other " held the office, and of the reversion of the office of Clerk of the Signet " now held by John Russell; in as full manner as the said John Russell "and Peter Newton and Henry Knight have held it." In 1510 he was summoned to appear before the Privy Council by John A. Price for breach of covenant, which was evidently in con- nection with the above offices, as shortly afterwards the Privy Council decided that John A. Price should have the office of Secretary of the Council with fees of 20 marks a year, and that Charles Foxe should have the office of Clerk of the Signet, according to the patent to hirri, and his brother Edmund, and an order was made that "all suca matters of variance as were depending between Price and Foxe shouldl be ended." Matters apparently, however, did not go smoothly, as in February, 1512, Charles Foxe and his brother Edmund were charged before the Privy Council with having made malicious allegations against the President of the Council of the Marches, and were ordered to be committed, to the Fleet prison; but being Burgesses of Parliarj" ment, and claiming the privilege of the House, were not imprisoned,' but were bound in recognizances to appear once a week before? the Privy Council during Parliament, and afterwards from time to time until they should have licence to depart. In this manner they were kept from Ludlow and the Council, and in their absence an order was made by the Privy Council that some person should be appointed to do their work, and the fees should be sequestered. In the following June they were ordered " to appear before tho Privy Council every Sunday." Charles Foxe was a member of the Council of the Marches, but does not seem MEMBERS OE PARLIAMENT EOR LUDLOW. 11 to have obtained the actual Secretaryship until 1574, and he never seems to have obtained the Clerkship to the Signet, as in 1581 he was defeated for that office (said to have been worth .£2000 a year) by Sir Philip Sydney's schoolfellow and friend, Sir Fulke Creville, after- wards Lord Brooke. Mr. Foxe was M.P. for Much Wcnlock 15G3-7, and Sheriff of Shropshire in 1583, and his eldest son, Sir Charles Foxe, who was also a member of the Council of the Marches, was Sheriff in 1598, while his third son also held both offices, being Sheriff in 1G08. In 1582 Charles Foxe was defendant in a Commission as to the Church and tithes of Cleobury Mortimer, " late parcel of the Abbey of Wigmore," and in 1581 his son Charles Foxe, jun. (afterwards Sir Charles Foxe), was joined with him as a defendant in that suit. Charles Foxe was Steward of Holdgate 1551, and was Recorder of Ludlow 157G-7. In 1588 he contributed £100 towards the defence of the country from the Spanish Armada. In 1511 he obtained a lease of Bromfield and the Rectory thereof, and of all kinds of tenths thereunto belonging, and this was after- wards merged into a freehold. Bromfield and Oakley Park passed from him to his son, Sir Charles Foxe, whose daughter married Matthew Herbert, and through her the property descended to her son, Francis Herbert, the ancestor of the Earls of Powis, and (through the female line) of the present owner, Lord Windsor. Shortly before his death he purchased St. Leonard's Chapel, Ludlow, and the adjoining land, and began to erect almshouses. He died before they were completed, but by his will, dated 1500, October 12th, ho directed them to be finished and endowed, out of the fund so constituted. St. Leonard's Chapel has been rebuilt and Foxe's Almshouse has been endowed (having now an income of about .£250 a year), so that his name still is and long will be gratefully remem- bered in Ludlow. He was buried at Bromfield on 21st December, 1590. There was formerly in the recess on the south side of the chancel in the ruins of the Priory adjoining Bromfield Church a stone, pro- bably marking the entrance to a vault and bearing the initials C. F. and E. F., these being, no doubt, the initials of Charles Foxe and his first wife Elizabeth, the daughter of Milo Crosby of Suffolk. This is now in the chancel of the Church. (8) Mr. Wheeler was Bailiff of Ludlow 1538, 1542, 1554, 1565. He was again M.P. 1511-1517, and 1552-1551. Ho was a member of an old Ludlow family, which is mentioned in Shro2)shire Visitation, 1583. He married Anna, daughter of William Foxo (No. 5 above), and sister of his eolleague Charles Foxe. Mr. Wheeler was Seneschal of the Palmers' Guild in 1534. Ho was buried at Ludlow 1574, July 15. 1542-44. (9) CHARLES FOXE and (10) EDMUND FOXE. Elected 21 Dec, 1541. (9) Also M.P. 1539-1.542, and 1547-1553. (See 7 abovo). (10) Edmund Foxic of laid ford was eldest son of William Foxo of ' 12 MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOR LUDLOW. St. John's (No. 5 above), and brother of Charles Foxe. He married the widow of Richard Hackluit, from whose family Hackluyt's Close at Ludford is named, and who was, no doubt, a relative of Thomas Hackluit, who was then Clerk of the Council of the Marches. He died 1569, and his will was proved in' the prerogative Court of Canterbury. In Eyton it is recorded that the Master and Brethren of St. John's Hospital conveyed it with all its possessions to Edmund Foxe, by a lease dated the 20th September, 1535. Is it not quite likely that this Edmund Foxe was identical with our M.P., the son of " William Foxe de St. John's," rather than (as stated by Duke) Edward Foxe, Bishop of Hereford (born at Dursley, who seems to have had no connection with Ludlow, and who was not consecrated Bishop of Hereford till 26 September, 1535)? In any case the entire interest in St. John's Hospital was granted to Edmund Foxe and his father, William Foxe, by grant dated 1537, October. Edmund Foxe, with his younger brother and fellow member, Charles Foxe, obtained the grant of the reversion of the offices of Clerk of the Council of the Marches and Clerk of the Signet, as stated in the notice of Charles Foxe (No. 7), and with him got into trouble with the Privy Council, as also there stated. It is worthy of notice that in 1536, the year before the grant of these offices, one Edmund Foxe was servant to Thomas Cromwell (Henry VIII. 's Prime Minister), and this may explain the grants of these offices and the power and influence which the Foxe family obtained, but we have nothing beyond supposition that this was the same man as the M.P. for Ludlow. 1545-7. (11) JOHN BRADSHAW and (12) THOMAS WHEELER. (11) Joiitf Bradshaw was Bailiff of Ludlow 1531, 1535, 1541. He was clearly a person of considerable importance, as the Bailiffs' Accounts for 1538 contain payments for Sack and Claret" at the coming of my Lord President's Kinswoman through Ludlow to be married to. John Bradshaw." Rowland Lee, Bishop of Coventry, was then Lord President. He benefited greatly by the dissolution of the Monasteries, as .we find that Bilbury, near Richard's Castle (formerly attached to Wigmore Abbey), was granted to him by Henry VIII. , and in the book of the Court of Augmentations for 1536 is a lease to him of St. Dogmael's Abbey, in the Diocese of St. David's, with the Manor of Fystyngard and Rectories there. He also obtained about tho same time a grant of the tithes of Walton, near Wenlock. In 1546 his pew in Ludlow Church was granted to the Bailiffs in consequence of his absence. Mr. Bradshaw was High Sheriff of Radnorshire in 154-6, and again in 1556 and 1558. (12) Also M.P. 1539-1542, and 1552-1554. See No. 8 above. MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOR LUDLOW. 13 1547-1552. (13) CHARLES FOXE and (13a) ROBERT BLOUNT. These names are inserted through the kindness of Mr* Dancorab Pink, and are taken from a MS. list at Hatfield- Mr. Blount's name is far more likely to be correct than that of Edmund Molineux given by Brown Willis in his Notitia Par- liamentaria. (13a) Robert Blount was the third son (out of 20 children) of Sir Thomas Blount of Kinlet, in the County of Salop, who was Sheriff of the county in 1480. Mr. Robert Blount is described as "Ante ambulo " in the Visitation, the note being "Ante ambulo means Serjeant-at-Macc, and is sometimes used for Gentleman Usher," so that, doubtless, Mr. Blount held office in the Court of the Marches. He married Anne, daughter of Sir Richard Croft, and died in 1580. 1517-1552. Return as given by Brown Willis, but probably in error. (13) CHARLES FOXE and (14) EDMUND MOLINEUX (13) See No. 7 above, also M.P. 1539, 1544, and 1552-3. (14) There is considerable doubt as to this member, as there is no return in the House of Commons Blue Book, and a query is added in Willis. If he was member, lie was almost certainly the Edmund Molineux who was King's Sergeant (corresponding to the modern Attornoy-Ccncral) in 1543, aftorwards became a Judge of the Court of Common Pleas, 1550, and was knighted. He was one of the then newly established "Council in the North." He died in 1562. It is very doubtful, however, whether he ever was M.P. for Ludlow. If so, he was possibly succeeded by Robert Blount upon his elevation to the Bench in 1550. 1552-3, March 1st to 31st, CHARLES FOXE and (15) THOMAS WHEELER. Elected 3 January, 1552-3. (15) See No. 7 and 8 above. 1553, Oct. to Dec. (16) JOHN PASSIE and THOMAS WHEELER (re-elected). Elected 26 Sept., 1553. (16) Bailiff of Ludlow 1529, 1546, 1557. 14 MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOR LUDLOW. 1554. (17) SIR JOHN PRICE, Knight, and (18) THOMAS BLASHFIELD. Elected 18 March, 1553-4. (17) Sir John Price was of Broadgate's Hall, Oxford. He was Fellow of All Souls, Oxford, 1523, Knighted 1546-7, March 2, B.C.L. 1525, Chancellor of Diocese of St. Asaph 1559, Canon of St. Asaph 15G0, M.P. County of Brecon 1547-52, Hereford 1553, Sheriff of Herefordshire, 1553, and Secretary of the Marches of Wales. His Arms were in Ludlow Castle. He married Joane, daughter of John Williams, alias Cromwell, of London, and appears to have been seated at Porteham, County of Hereford. This is, doubtless, the John A. Price with whom Charles Foxe had the differences which came before the Privy Council in 1540, when the Secretaryship was awarded to Price, and the Clerkship of the Signet to Charles Foxe. Sir John Price appears to have benefited greatly by the dissolution of the monasteries, for we find that St. Guthlac's Priory, with its extensive and valuable possessions in the County of Hereford, was granted to him about 1540. Doubtless, this arose from his connection by marriage with the great Thomas Cromwell, Earl of Essex, whose nephew, Richard Cromwell, and his descendants styled themselves " Cromwell alias Williams," and it is possiblo that Sir John Price's wifo Joano was a niece of the great " Mauler of Monasteries." (See Carlyle's Cromwell). Oliver Cromwell, the Lord Protector, was of the same family. (18) Thomas Blasiifield was Bailiff of Ludlow 154G, 1551, 1559, and was Sergeant-at-Arms to the Council of the Marches. He was buried at Ludlow on 15 March, 1573-4. His daughter married John Weaver of Stapleton, who was High Sheriff of Radnorshire 1588. 1554-5. (19) JAMES WARNCOMBE and (20) JOHN ALSOP. Elected 26 Oct., 1554. (19) James Warncombe was one of the Warncombes of Ivington, near Leominster. Ho was M.P. for Leominster 1535, County of Hereford 15G3-7, and Hereford City 1571-1583. As standing Counsel to Leominster he was intimately connected with that borough, and was Mayor of Hereford 1571. His daughter and heiress married one of the Harley family. He was Recorder of Ludlow from 1550 to 1561. (20) John Alsop was Bailiff of Ludlow in 1543, 1552, 15G2. He is • mentioned as paying 40s. to tlio repairs of Mill Street Mills which then belonged to the Crown, and about which a law sui afterwards involved the town in great expense. Mr. Alsop was Tow Clerk of Ludlow for many years, and was Recorder of the town. I was buried at Ludlow on 29th June, 15G9, when ho was described the Rogistor as " Recorder of this Towno." MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOR LUDLOW. 15 1555, October to December. (21) WILLIAM HEATH and (22) THOMAS CROFT. Elected 28 Sept., 1555. (21) William Heath was, doubtless, a' relative of Nicholas Heath* Bishop of Worcester, and Archbishop of York, who was then Lord President of the Marches, and who was Lord Chancellor under Queen Mary, but refusing to crown Queen Elizabeth was imprisoned for a short time. Tho present member probably married a daughter of Thomas Blount of Sodington. (22) There is nothing actually proving that Thomas Croft was one of the great family of Croft of Croft Castle, but he is described as Esquire in the return, and there is little or no doubt on the subject. Sir James Croft, the Controller of the Household to Queen Elizabeth, one of the Privy Council, and a foremost statesman of that day, had a younger brother, Thomas Croft, born about 1520, who was, doubt- less, the member for Ludlow. Thomas Croft married the daughter of Sir Philip Paris. Sir Herbert Croft is now the representative of the family. 1558, January to November. (23) RICHARD PRYNCE AND (24) ROBERT MASON. Elected 8 January, 1557-8. (23) Richard Prynce was a celebrated lawyer of Shrewsbury, who built Whitohall there. He was styled " Counsel at the Barre in the Court of the Marches." He married the daughter of William Leighton of Plash, Salop. Two of his sons were knighted, and one was Sheriff of Shropshire. He was M.P. for Bridgnorth in 1559. He is described in Owen and Blakeway as " Literatus M when admitted as a Burgess of Shrewsbury in 1551, which title it is there said was probably in- tended to denote his destination to the study of the law. In 1569 he was Fcodary of Shropshire, who is described in the History of Shrews hurt/ as the officer to attend on tho Inquisitions after the death of tenants in Chivalry under the feudal system, and to watch over the' Crown dues. Richard Prynce was buried 5 October, 1598. (24) Robert Mason is described in a subsequent return as a " Tanner." He was one of the Masons of Diddlebury and Minton, then a well-known family. He was Bailiff of Ludlow 1555, 1563, and Churchwarden 1551, and was buried at Ludlow, 13th November, 1591. In 1552 a lease was granted to him of the "Town Ditch from Broad St. Cute to Old St. Catc, with the Fish Pool in the same." 1558-9. (25) WILLIAM PO UGH NILE and ROBERT MASON re-elected. Elected 16 January, 1558-9. (25) William Pol/gunill was Bailiff of Ludlow 1561, 1570, 1575, 1582, IJe was, doubtless, the member from whom the name was 16 MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOR LUDLOW. given to Poughnill, now the residence of Mr. Charlton, and once the great printing press of the neighbourhood, where the works of Mrs. Chapone and other authors were printed by Mr. Nicholson. Church- warden of Ludlow 1570. He died 1583. 1562-1567. WILLIAM POUGHNILL and (26) RICHARD LANGFORD. Elected about December, 1562. (26) Richard Lanoford was Bailiff 1544, 1549, and was probably the father of Charles Langford, Dean of Hereford, who by his will in 1607 founded the Langfordian Scholarships at Ludlow Grammar School for four boys " out of such poor and towardlie for learning as are born in the said town," which scholarships are still existing, and have recently been remodelled. 1571, April to May. WILLIAM POUGHNILL and ROBERT MASON re-elected. 1572-1583. Do. and Do. Re-elected 20 April, 1572. 1584-5. (28) ROBERT BERRIE and (29) RICHARD FFARR. Elected 8 November, 1584. (28) Robert Berrie was admitted a Burgess of Ludlow 1579, when he was described as a gentleman, and was Bailiff of Ludlow 1589, 1592, 1601, 1611. His son was Supervisor of Herefordshire and Shropshire 1623. In the State papers we find him as Bailiff of Ludlow reporting to the Privy Council that Jane Shelley had by will left money to the Papists, and he goes on " Having £3000 a year and living sparingly.'' He seems to have held the office of porter of Ludlow Castle, for in the State Papers under the date of 1597, May 31, we find the follow- ing entries : — " Grant to Robert Hartgell of the portership of Ludlow Castle and the Tennis play there on the surrender of Robert Berry. Fee £4 a year." Mr. Berrie was, probably, appointed porter in 1589-90, when in the Churchwardens' Accounts of Ludlow there is an entry, "Paid for the ringing at Mr. Berries appointment the 1st Septemberl2d." Robert Berrie died 1618, May 26, and was buried in Ludlow Church. (29) Richard Ffarr was Bailiff 1568, 1578. He seems from his admission as a Burgess in 1551, and from a lease of 1552, to hav^ been a Mercer in Ludlow. MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOR LTJDLOW. 17 1586-87. ROBERT BERRIE and (30) THOMAS CANDLAND. Elected 5 Oct, 1586. (30) Thomas Candland was Bailiff 1576, 1584, 1591, 1606, Churchwarden 1571. He was founder of one of the minor charities of Ludlow, which still exists, 20s. a year being charged on premises at the head of Pepper Lane (now in the occupation of Mr. Mickle- wright), which the founder directed should pass to the Corporation of Ludlow if the 20s. yearly be not paid. Thomas Candland as Bailiff signed tho instrument of association for the protection of Queen Elizabeth in 1584. There was a monument to his memory in the South Chapel of Ludlow Church, which bore this inscription — " Here lieth the body of Thomas Canlande, Gent., who died 12 Sept., 1617, then eldest , Alderman of Ludlow, and five times one of the Burgesses of Parlia- ^ ment of the same town." 1588-9. ROBERT BERRIE and THOMAS CANDLAND. Elected 29 Oct., 1588. 1592-3, DITTO and DITTO. Elected Jan., 1592-3, 1597-8. (31) HUGH SANFORD (Esq.), and DITTO. \ Elected 7 Oct., 1597. (31) Hugh Sanford is possibly an error for " Humphrey," as, so far tas oan be ascertained, no " Hugh " Sanford then existed in Shropshire, \and if the name were abbreviated " Hu," tho mistake is easily intelli- gible. The member was certainly a man of consequence, as in the return jhe is styled " Esquire," a title not so frequently used in the 16th century 'as now. Humphrey Sanford (born 1543) was the son of Richard ^Sanford and his wife Margaret, daughter of Humphrey Plowden of (Plowden, and sister of the famous lawyer, Edmund Plowden. He appears to have been implicated in the conspiracies in favour of Mary Queen of Scots, for in 1580 a pardon for treason was granted to him .under the Great Seal. He died in 1G11, and was buried at Lydbury iNorth. There was, however, a Hugh Sanford who was M.P. for 'Wilton in the next two Parliaments of 1601 and 1604 until his Vlecease in 1607, who may have been the member for Ludlow. ( This return is taken from the Official Blue Book. Browno Willis ;names as tho Ludlow members in this Parliament tho old mombers, Robert Berrie and Thomas Candland, but adds a query. Vol. VII., 2nd S. < 0 i ) 18 MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOR LUDLOW. 16C\ (32) ROBERT BERRIE and (33) THOMAS CANDLAND. Elected 5 Oct., 1601. (32) See 28 above. (33) See 30 above. 1603-11. DITTO and (34) RICHARD BENSON. Elected 1st March, 1603-4. (34) Richard Benson was Bailiff of Ludlow 1596, 1603, Church- warden 1588-9 ; died 1609. 1609. (35) RICHARD FISHER vice RICHARD BENSON, deceased. Elected 7 Dec, 1609. (35) Richard Fisher was son of John Fisher of Worcester, and was an Alderman of Ludlow and Bailiff 1604, 1609, 1618. He is \ mentioned as Alderman in the curious tract published by Mr. Clive, " The Lovo of Wales to their Soueraigno Prynce," and as the com- poser of the English verses read in 1616 at the Pageant in Ludlow or the occasion of the proclamation of Charles (afterwards Charles I.) as,:' Prince of Wales. In 1561 ho was a pupil at Shrewsbury School, whoro, no doubt, lie acquired his scholarship, and is entered in tho Register as " alienus." Mr. Fisher was in 1627 mado the first. Capital Master of Ludlow. There is a curious document in the State papers with regard to> this election, in the form of a letter from the Corporation of Ludlow to the Earl of Salisbury, in which they decline to elect (as requested^) John Leveson as Burgess in place of Richard Benson, deceased, a/s they can elect "none but a Resident, and have refused Lord Eure's: request for his brother, Sir Francis Eure." This Lord Salisbury was Robert Cecil (son of Queen Elizabeth's ; favourite minister), who was Lord Treasurer and Prime Minister until 1 his death in 1612, and the ancestor of the present Marquis of Salisbury . 1614. (36) ROBERT BERRIE and (37) HENRY TOWNSHEND. Elected March, 1614. I This return is taken from the original Minute Book of tho Corporation, and is undoubtedly correct. There is said to b o no entry in any Record Office of the members of this Parlia ,- ment. Willis's Parliamentaria Notitia gives Will. Walter, Knt., and Robert Berry as members for Ludlow, but adds a query, and this, so far as Sir Will. Walter is concerned, i*s clearly a mistake. Richard Tomlyns was a candidate for Pa/r- MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOR LUDLOW. 19 liamentary honours at this election, but was rejected on the gi Aind that he was not a sworn Burgess of the Borough. (36) Mr. Berrie had been member from 1584, but on this occasion his election was declared invalid, on the ground that he was Bailiff of Ludlow, and as such returned himself* (See No. 28 above). (37) Sir Henry Townsiiend was the third son of Sir Robert Towns- hend, Chief Justice of Chester, whose monument is still in Ludlow Church. Henry Townshcnd married the daughter of Sir Rowland Hay ward of Cound. He was M.P. for Bridgnorth 1571-83, Justice of Chester 1579, Steward of Shrewsbury 1597, Burgess of Ludlow 1584, Recorder of Ludlow 1577-1G21, one of the Council of the Marches of Wales 1586, Knighted 1604, first Recorder of Oswestry 1617, Recorder of Leominster 1590. He presented two silver gilded spoons to the Ludlow Corporation, who appear to have entertained him frequently. In the Bailiff's Accounts 1616-17 we find payments for " 1 quart of burnt sack given to him," and also for " 1 dozen of fine cakes, 4 pounds of cherries, a gallon of white and claret wine, three quarters of a .pound of fine sugar, rose water and lemon, mackerons half a pound, confeytes a pound and half, all is 8/8 a gift to the Lady Townshend." ) This is a curious commentary on the manners of the time. The k like seems to have been done for Sir Henry when he visited Leo- 1 minster. He died in 1621, and was buried at Cound. { Sir Henry occupied when in Ludlow " a faire house in St. Austen's Snce a Friarie." h614. (38) ROBERT LLOYD in place of ROBERT BERRIE J, unseated. \ Elected 11 May, 1614. * This return is taken from the Minute Book of the Corpora- ti'on, and is undoubtedly correct, though it appears nowhere j else. This entry is not given in the only known list of members lof this Parliament, viz., that found among the Kimbolton MSS., tand late the property of the Duke of Manchester. J (38) Robert Lloyd is recorded as Burgess of the Parliament in the pblace of Mr. Berrie, whose election was invalidated as having been V Bailiff returning himself." In the entry in the Minute Book Mr. iLloyd is described as " Robert Lloyd, Esquire, Sewer to the Queen's (Most Excellent Majestie." The full entry has been transcribed on (page 4 above. He seems to have been high in favour with Anne of iDenmark (James I.'s Queen), and from the following curious and {interesting extracts from the State papers, he rose to be an admiral and to be knighted (1616, July 19). i 1616, March 25. — Grant to Lord Knyvctt and Robert Lloyd, Admiral to the Queen, of £12,000, moiety of old debts due to the (prown in lieu of a similar grant to Ralph Ewens, the Queen's late Auditor, frustrated by his decease. 20 MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOR LUDLOW. 1617 y March 13. — Sir Robert Lloyd, Admiral to the Queen, was appointed with another a collector of Customs on Northern Cloth for 21 years. 1618, Feb. 14, \ The Queen is justly implacable against Sir Robert London. / Lloyd (Floyd), who got,, from her a lease of the Royalties of all her lands. Those about her feed her anger, for Lloyd had slandered them all to her when he was highest in her favours. He rose from a serving man to an estate of £800 a year, and is likely to fall as suddenly. Sir Robert Lloyd was evidently disgraced, for in the " Court and Times of James I." we find that Sir George Reynolds and another were discharged tho Queen's service for having visited Sir Robert in his disgrace. Ho appears, however, to have recovered to some extent , his position, as the following will show : — ( 1620. Grant to Sir Robert Lloyd of the office of engrossing wills t and Inventories for life. ( In 1621 he was returned as M.P. for Minehead, when he again got \ into disgrace. The Committee of Grievances reported to tho House ( of Commons on 21 March, 1621, that the patent for wills was tho 1 worst grievance of all, and that Sir R. Lloyd had the solo ingrossing of all Wills and Inventories. After a debate Sir Robert was ordered to / be removed out of the House for being a projector and maintainer of f the Patent. He was then called to the Bar, and directed by the Speaker to be expelled, and his name was removed from the list of members. L; Leominster in James I.'s reign was vested in his Queen, Anno of Denmark, as part of her jointure, which may possibly account for Sii ' Robert Lloyd's presence in these parts. y 1620-22. (39) HENRY SPENCER, LORD COMPTOnI and (40) RICHARD TOMLYNS. ( f Elected 2 January, 1G20-1. \ j (39) Henry Spencer, Lord Compton, was the eldest son of the first Marquis of Northampton, K.G., who was Lord President of the,/ Marches of Wales 1617 to 1630. |, Our member, Lord Compton, became second Marquis of North- ampton on his father's death in 1630. He was firmly attached to tin') royal party in tho Civil Wars, was a very gallant soldier, fought a(; Edgehill, and was slain in March, 16*12-3, when fighting victoriously at the head of his troops at Hopton Heath, in the moorlands of : Staffordshire. He was offered his life, but refused to take it, sayings that he " scorned to take quarter from such base rogues and rebel1?)', as they were." He was ono of the Council of tho Marches of Waley in his father's presidency, 1627. Ho accompanied Charles I. whem Prince of Wales to Madrid, as Master of tho Robes, and though hih life was passed in tho luxury of tho Court, ho is said to have bee-a 1 Sans reprocho " as ho was " Sans pour." His mother was thjo MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOR LUDLOW. 21 daughter of Sir John Spenser, Alderman and Clothworker, of London, one of the richest heiresses of the day, and the story runs that Lorl William Compton carried her off in the disguise of a baker's man. (40) Richard Tomlyns was a native of Ludlow, who seems to have gone to reside at Richmond and Westminster, and was a cousin of Richard Tomlyns, a Baron of the Exchequer, with whom he must not be confounded. Richard Tomlyns in 1649 gave a rent-charge of £33 6s. 8d. (which sum is still paid) for the education and benefit of the poor of Ludlow. He afterwards appeared to revoke this gift under a power reserved in tho original deed, and litigation ensued. Thanks, ■•lowevcr, to the good offices of Baron Tomlyns, the town did not lose the member's benefaction, as it was confirmed by a deed dated in 1652, aDd given in trust for the "good, benefit and relief of the poor of Ludlow." The rent is at present applied to the National Schools. > Tho following letters written by Mr. Tomlyns, &c., with reference to his representation of Ludlow may be of interest as illustrative of he times of Charles I. * Worshipful Mr. Bailiffs and the rest, I doubt not but that you have received his Majesty's proclamation for the Parliament wherein you are to choose your burgesses, I did offer my service to have been one of them the last Parliament, but because I was not then sworn, exceptions were taken against it, as there was just cause. Since, as ' ome of you know, I have been admitted and sworn, whereby I am ( pw incorporated as well by birth as by order and record. Now I i^vo thought good to renew my suit unto you, that if you shall think * i, >e worthy, I may be chosen one of your burgesses for this Parlia- ment. I assure myself you will be importuned by letters from greater persons, but I hope you will be constant to hold your ancient and laudable custom, namely to choose none but your native and sworn burgesses. I do confess that I distrust my ability as not worthy to be a member of that honorable, learned, and grave assembly, but being confident in myself to be a true hearted Englishman, to \\ove my country and commonwealth, as becometh every good subject, ^ am encouraged to bear suit in this behalf, in which, if it shall ]blcase you to accept my services, I shall do my uttermost and best endeavour, according to that power of judgment and reason which pod hath enabled mo with, and because my residence for the most part is here at Westminster, I will acquit you from all charge and bear it myself concerning this service. Besides, it is not unknown unto some of my near friends among you that long since I had a purpose out of my poor estate to do some good for the town. It may be in part while I live, but sure after my decease, if it please God, and so leaving this my request unto your mature consideration, I commend my best wishes and hearty commendations unto you all from my lodgings in Westminster this 22nd of tho November, 1620. " Your affectionate loving friond and always to command, "Richard Tomlyns." 22 MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOR LUDLOW. " Mr. Bailiffs, I have nothing else to write of, only my being your burgess of the last Parliament cost me dear, for in the late benevolenco my name was found in the roll of burgesses, by reason whereof I was sent for unto -the Council table before the Lords, and there between fair persuasions and otherwise I was brought to give thirty pounds, which I paid, whereas many with great estates, and lands and office gave little more, and I have neither lands nor office, thus much by the way that is in my mind. " Westminster this 20th of June, 1622, " Your very loving friend, "Richard Tomlyns." " Right Worshipful. Whereas I do heartily wish for good reasons" that you are pleased to elect Mr. Tomlins, ono of the Burgesses of the Parliament for your town, and do hear that there is some suspicior' or objection that he is inclinable to Popery, and will (if he be chosen) expect or sue for his charges of attendance in Parliament according- to the statute from the Corporation. I assure you both the one and* the other is injurious to the gent., for I assure you he is as sincere and dovoted to the Church of England and common weal hereof as* any man I know, and do so undertake to you and your Corporation horcby that ho shall never demand or suo for his said charges, and so I commend and commit him to your confidence, and love and rest always your loving friend to command, ; "George Holland. "Bromfield, 27 January, 1623 (4). "To the Right Worshipful the Bailiffs of the Town of Ludlol give these." v " Mr. Bailiffs and the rest, the breach of the last Parliament at Oxford being the first of King Charles and the no great good success of Parliaments in tho latter times of King James, in all which, with your loves and good opinions I have been chosen, thongh unworthy,, to be one of your burgesses, hath almost disheartened and discouraged me to desire to be of any more Parliaments ; nevertheless, we musi not be faint and wearied in our minds, but hope and pour out om: continual and hearty prayers that Almighty God will inspire the King to enquire and do that which shall be for the glory of his great name; the honour and safety of this state, and the welfare of this Church and Commonwealth, and that our good and gracious God would aver't his judgments which yet hang over this kingdom. The late grievou's and dovouring pestilence is yet fresh in memory, though now almost extinguished through God's extraordinary a] id abundant mercy, yet the sword is more than threatened after this long peace, the purchase whereof I am afraid will cost us dear. We hear of no good success of our groat navy, some four of the ships are come homo, and we must pray God to send the rest in safety. It is resolved his Majesty will call a Parliament to bogin tho 1st Fobmary noxt, and it may be MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOR LUDLOW. 23 the writ for choice of your burgesses is already come to your hands, wherein if you shall be pleased to elect me for one, I shall give my attendance and do my utmost endeavours to do my country and you serv.ee, and if you shall think upon any other choice more able and worthy, whereof I am assured there are many, I shall not take it in ill part, only let me advise that in your election you do choose suoh as are approved and known sound religious honest men, who respect I the good of the republic more than any man's favour or private ends, '^and surely I am of opinion (if ever) this Parliament will require such 'persons to be of the house, and so I shall pray with other true hearted /subjects that Almighty God will pour down his blessings thereupon that the beginning and end thereof may bo happy and profitable both ffor tho King and subject, and so with my best wishes and hearty commendations unto all your brethren and associates, I shall ever i bmain your assured and affectionate loving friend to command, ®' " Richard Tomlyns. v/ "London, 30th Dec, 1625." j "P.S. — I wrote unto my cousin Cupper that 40s. should be given lout of my rent unto your poor, which I pray you be careful to dis- tribute to such persons as stand in most need, especially old men or .women." ( " Good Mr. Bailiffs, it hath pleased the King now at last to call a ^Parliament, when there was little hope of any. I understand the writs of summons arc gone unto Wales, but unto the English shires ; one have as yet, which causeth some doubt whether it will hold or hfe, but I hope it will be without all doubt. I have served for your borough with your good allowance now four Parliaments past, of which threo of them hayo been broke and fruitless, to the great grievance of all good subjects, and the unspeakable hindrance and damage of the commonwealth, whereof the whole kingdom suffers in a great measure. I had resolvod with myself, being now grown into years and sickly, not to have been in any more Parliaments, never- theless, some gentlemen of worth and others my familiar friends have ^,')rsuadcd mo onco moro to bo of this Parliament, in hope of better success, which God grant ; that tho King and his people may accord to the glory of tho Almighty and tho public good and welfare of the commonwealth, wherefore if it shall please you to make choice of me to serve in this Parliament as heretofore, I shall give my attendance and do my best endeavours. If otherwise in your discretions you shall think of any other more able and worthy, as there aro many, I shall be well contented therewith, and so leaving it wholly to your consideration, I shall in this or any other service for the good of the Corporation be right glad to do my best endeavours. With my right hearty commendations, prayers, and well wishes for the welfare and prosperity of the whole society, I shall ever remain your assured loving friend and brother, " Rio. Tomlyns. " Westminster, 8th February, 1027 (8)." t 24 MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOR LUDLOW. Extract from letter from Bailiffs with regard to alleged revocation by Mr. Tomlyns, deceased, of the rent-oharge granted by him to the town. " We received a letter of the 14th present, by which you demand £15 of this Corporation by virtue of a deed from Mr. Tomlyns our good friend deoeased, which being so contrary, not only to his professed affection and engagement to this his native place, which had. honored him so often with a burgess place in Parliament, when persons of honour were to its prejudice denied, and to his often promises thereupon, and that of late years too, but also to his own deliberate act contrived by advice of a learned and able counsel as y e land could afford, to ye end it might remain inviolable, and of which being done he presently gave ample signification unto this Corporation to keep by them as a real assurance of his love and gratitude that cannot imagino he should unless in weakness act anything in p>) > judice thereof. Now if any praotisc hath been made upon him in fcMt condition (a thing often attempted by some) as we well know, it will prove invalid. "Deoember, 1650." j 1623-5. (41) RALPH GOODWIN and RICHARD TOMLYNS. Elected about January, 1623-4. (41) Ralph Goodwin is described in the return of 1625 as of Ludlow Castle. He was the son of Ralph Goodwin (probably of Bristol), agd he is described in the Borough Records when admitted as a Burglss of Ludlow as Ralph Goodwin, junior. He was probably B.A. Cambridge 1611, and M.A. Oxford 1615. Either he, or possibly his father, was Muster Master at Ludlow, as we find an order from the President of the Marches, Lord Northampton, in 1621 to levy money to pay him. He was deputy both to Sir Adam Newton and Lord Goring as Secretary and Clerk of the Council in the Marches of Wales, to which office he was admitted on October 28, 1628. j In connection with his services under Lord Goring wo ascertah^a good many facts about him, for in 1646 his lordship laid an informa- tion that moneys were owing to him from Ralph Goodwin as deputy Clerk of the Signet. Mr. Goodwin stated in reply : — " I was deputy Secretary 16 years, and had to attend the President and the Committee, write letters and certificates, but not to interfere with money matters. I had a salary from his lordship. I received none of the profits, but others did." In answer to this, is an interesting statement " that Ralph Goodwin was an M.P., but deserted his trust, and became Secretary to Prince Rupert. When he came out of Bristol he had 1,500 gold pieces, his lands were worth ,£300 a year, and his personalty <£6,000 to .£8,000. He had lately had £3,000 by marriage with his wife." The "coming out of Bristol " may have referred to tho siege of Bristol whon it was IJ MEMBERS-*^ | —^MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOR LUDLOW. 25 ti urrendered by Prince Rupert to the Parliamentary forces in Septem- >r, 1645, for we find Mr. Goodwin forwarding from Bristol in May, ^ j45, intercepted letters. Nothing seems to have resulted from the proceedings against Mr. Goodwin. , He belonged to the King's party in the Civil Wars, and in February, J 643-4, was "disabled from the service of the House for desertion, Icing of the King's party." He was mentioned in Prince Rupert's Commission " To the Loyal Men of Shropshire." In 1646 he compounded for delinquency for "being in Ludlow whilst it was a garrison for the King, which he could not avoid," and was fined £412 10s. 0d., which sum was paid, and a lease of his property by the County Committee, was declared void, and he was allowed to take possession. When a candidate for Parliament in 1639 it is said of him in a letter of that date, after speaking of Mr. Baldwyn, his afterwards colleague, "Mr. Goodwyn appears no less earnest, and with his Xmas Cheare hath feasted the Burgesses, and endeavours by their bellies to gain tlien tongues, but it is thought the Burgesses are not well affected towards him." He married Dorothy, youngest daughter of Sir Walter Long of Wraxall, M.P. for Wiltshire, and thus became connected with the Fox family, as his wife's sister married Sir Edward Fox, grandson of Charles Fox (No. 7), and her mother married in sccondes noces Sir Edward Fox himself. In 1616 ho was with Henry Townscnd and others in the garrison of Worcester at its surrender. In 1625 ho obtained the office of Examiner of the Court of the Marches, which is stated in 1660 to be vacant by the death of Ralph Goodwin and Samuel Eure, but to be "of small yearly value." Ralph Goodwin is said by Aubrey to have been an author of learn- ing and an excellent poet. His wife Dorothy died in 1643, and he was evidently married a second time, for when in 1658 he died in- testate letters of administration were on 23rd August 1658, granted to his relict, Elizabeth Goodwin. He was buried in the high chancel of Ludlow Church, where there was a monument with this simple inscription : " Here lieth the body of Ralph Goodwin, Esq., who died 1st May, 1658." He left no issue, as we find that Somerset Fox, M.P. for Ludlow in 1669, petitions for the grant of tho reversion of certain estates in Cowarne Magna Herefordshire, "now in tho Crown for want of issue of Ralph Goodwin." 1635. RALPH GOODWIN and RICHARD TOMLYNS. Elected 3 May, 1625. 1625-6. DITTO and DITTO. Elected Jan., 1625-6. Upon this, as on several other occasions, the gentlemen elected undertook to relieve the town from the sums usually paid to tho members. Vol. VII., 2nd S. ' 1) 26 MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOR LUDLOW 1627-8. RALPH GOODWIN and RICHARD TOMLYN^ Elected March, 1627-8. - 1640. Ditto and (42) Charles Baldwyn. Elected March, 1639-40. Sir Robert Knepper (Napier), who was son-in-law of the Earl of Bridgwater, the Lord President of the Marches, was aa unsuccessful candidate at this election. Further in a letter from Ludlow Castle under date 1639-40, January, it is stated that " Mr. Solicitor (Timothy Turneur, Solicitor of the Court of the Marches) has received an answer from his townsmen not answerable to his expectations, declines the desire of his being a Burgess, and recommends his friends to vote for Mr. Baldwyn." In this year the members again remitted the usual members' allowances. (42) Charles Baldwyn was one of the family of Baldwyns of Elsich, and the first of four generations of that family who represen- ted Ludlow. He was a man of considerable estate. He was "dis- abled" from the service of the House for desertion, being "of the King's party," in February, 1643-4. He was born 1593, married Mary, daughter of Francis Holland of Burwarton ; died 16tli Feb- ruary, 1674, and was buried at Diddlebury. In the Calendar of Proceedings for the advance of money 1642-1046 Mr. Baldwyn was on 28th July, 1644, assessed at £1,000, and on 30th October, 1646, at £400, and in March, 1647, was allowed 14 days to produce acquittances. In 1646 he compounded for his "delinquency" in living in " the King's quarters ard signing warrants for advancing money for his Majesty's service, and was comprised within the articles of Ludlow, being a Burgess thereof." He was fined £880, which, was reduced in September, 1646, to £586 13s. 4d. When candidate for Parliamentary honours in 1639 he is said in a letter of that day "to importunately labour with his friends and purse with the Burgesses," so that between him and his fellow member, Mr. Goodwin, the Burgesses must have had high festivities. The following extract from a letter from Mr. Baldwyn to 'he Bailiffs of Ludlow may be of interest : — "Mr. Bailiffs, "On Monday last the Knights and Burgesses of Shropshire attended at Court touching the Composition for provision money for that county, wherein little is yet done, only an offer made to the honourable persons of the green cloth that the said county will give £150 composition for his Majesty's provision out of that county, which offer tho next wcelco will bo resolved on, and not before. * * * * * * L " MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOR LUDLOW. 27 "News, little determined yet in Parliament. The trial of the Earl of Strafford hinders proceeding this week. Agreement is with the Scotts for one month's treaty longer at the former rate of £25,000 I the month, wluch ends the 16 April next, by which time I hope all I that treaty will happily end. Bishops arc voted in our House of ^Commons not to have legislative or judicial power in the Lords Mouse in Parliament, nor they or any clergymen to have any power ]jn Star Chamber, nor to be on Commission of the Peace, or in any civil Court to have any authoritie, and order given that a bill be presently drawn to take all this power from them. A bill is read t jiat no minister have but one benefice, and to rcsigne the other hefore the 1st day of February next. I intend, God willing, to get lejave to come down in the beginning of April at furthest. I then in tend, God willing, to waite on you at Ludlow, in the interim I shall bo ready to do what I am able for your Corporation, and so with my b est respects to you and all the rest of my good friends in Ludlow remembered, I rest and remain ever ready to serve you, " C. Baldwyn. i "London, 13 March, 1640 (1)." / " The Earl of StrajFprd will come to trial the next wceke.' 1640, Long Parliament. RALPH GOODWIN and CHARLES I BALDWYN. Elected 10 Oct., 1640. \ 1646. (43) THOMAS MACK WORTH and (44) THOMAS I MOOR. . Elected 8 August, 1646. \ 43 and 44. These were two Parliamentarians returned in obedience to the writ of Thomas Mytton, who was Sheriff for tlje Parliament (Sir F. Ottley being Sheriff for the King) in p|ace of Ralph Goodwin and Charles Baldwyn, " disabled." B'pth were removed from being Burgesses of Ludlow after the Restoration. ,(43) Thomas Mackwortit, according to Mr. Blakeway, the Shrop- shire historian, was son of Thomas Mackworth of Bctton Strange, aiAd uncle of Humphrey Mackworth, the well-known Governor of Shrewsbury, and prominent Parliamentarian, who was justice of the County Palatine, Recorder of Bridgnorth, and one of Cromwell's Council of State. [Though it is the height of presumption to differ from him, the writer ventures in this instance to doubt whether Mr. Blakeway is correct. It would seem far more likely that the Ludlow M.P. was Thomas Mack- worth (the son oi" Col. Humphrey Mackworth, the Governor of Sh!rewrsbury), who was born 1627. It is true that he would be only 19l^at the date of the election, but this was no insuperable objection in I i 28 MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOR LUDLOW. the case of the son of so powerful a father. The identity of our rncmbor is proved by the following interesting letter from Humphrey Mackworth, which has been found among the Ludlow Records : — " Mr. Bail yes, j " 1 acknowledge it as a special respect from you that you were/ pleased to ingagc yourselves for the election of my sonne to be a! Burgcsse for your Towno. I have now sent him over to waite upon, you and the rest of your house, when if you please to prepare him1; the better to lit him to receive your courtesy by making him ex Burgesse, I shall rest then the better satisfyed of the reality of your intentions. And though he be younge, yet I assure you he has beem so well seasoned with the breeding bestowed upon him that I am content the disgrace light upon me if he prove not fit for the employ- ment I desire he may now be entrusted withal. I have ever dedi- cated him in my thoughts to the service of the Commonwealth, and shall be glad he may grow up therein, which if it happen, as I hope it will, by your sending of him out I know not only the firstfruits1, but the continued current of his endeavours will be spent and irri- ployed in obtaining the welfare and prosperity of your town, which also shall be seconded by setting a work the best counsels and friends} I have for the same purpose, reckoning myself in as great a measure; to be ingaged for you by your courtesy to my son as if you had^ bestowed it upon myself. I have not been wanting already to prevent what detriment or damage I could from your town, and I know yo;u have not fared the worse for my care of you. I intrcat you to think 'it is not done only until my own turne be served, but believe you shall always find the like .espects from / Your assured loving friend to serve you " H. Mackworth.' ff Salop, 22 June, 1646. j 11 To the right worshipful his much respected friends the Bailiffs, of Ludlow these." ■ - Thomas Mackworth was M.P. for Shropshire in the Parliaments of 165G and 1659, Sheriff of Shropshire 1GG9, and Farmer of the Excise in Lancashire. Tie married first, Anne, daughter of Richard Bulkclcy; and secondly, Sarah, daughter of General Thomas Mytton of Halston. He was fined £100 for non-attendance by the Rump on September 30,1659. He died in 1696, aged 70. ' (44) Thomas Moor or More was a brother of Samuel More, the prominent Parliamentarian officer, famous for his defence of HopJton Castle, the massacre of whoso defenders after their surrender is one of the most painful and indefensible events in the Civil Wars. J The presumption that the M.P. for Ludlow was a brother of Colonel Samuel More arises partly from the fact that he was certainly a Parliamentarian, and partly from a letter written by Colonel Afore to tho Bailill's of Bishop's Castle, in which he recommends for election MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOR LUDLOW. 29 as one of the members for that borough in 1G45 "my brother, Mr. Thomas More, whom you know, but for him I say no more, for I know he will serve you the best he can." He was, however, not elected for Bishop's Castle, but the Ludlow election took place a few months afterwards, and he was, no doubt, ) elected for our borough. Mr. Robert Jasper More, M.P. for the Ludlow Division, is the present representative of the family, which is one of the oldest Shropshire families. Thomas More was one of the secluded members of 1648, whose return was enforced by Monk. In " The Mystery of a good old Cause" iie is described as " Officer of the Custom House, whose brother was Governor of Ludlow Castle." He was a Commissioner of Taxes 1649 1653, Little or Barebones Parliament, to which no writ was issued to any Borough. ( (45) JOHN ASTON \ (45) Mn. Aston was a Barrister, and perhaps had another business? was an Alderman of the Borough, BaililF 1649, 1652, and of course, a Parliamentarian. In 1662 he was removed from being Alderman and Burgess. He is mentioned in a letter which appears in the Bridg- water Manuscripts, and which runs : — " Here in Ludlowe hath been some sturre this last wceke by means of a letter sent by post on Wcnsday at night last directed for his Majesties special service to Mr. John Astone at Ludlow and in his absence to Richard Griffiths who has taken his shoppe Look well to yure Townc for the papeists are said to have a bloody designe." The following extract from a letter written by John Aston, M.P., from Westminster, dated 1654, February 7, and addressed to the Bailitis of Ludlow, will be of general interest : — "And now I shall givo you an accompt of my single agitation (because I hearc it is gone abroad and taken notice of) with the Protector about ye jurisdiction of the Marches. I had access to His Highness 3 times whilst ye Parliament sate, who relished it well, but since ye Parliament rose I have attended almost 20 times and cannot speak with him, save only that himself putt meo into a roome pro- mising to speak with mce presently, but he came not, though I at- tended till 9 at night, and at another time he opened the doore and spake to mec, telling meo he would gladly speak with mee, but ho could not then. The business is so great, what with the Plot and other seriouse affairs since ye dissolving of ye House that ye attend- ance is exceeding great, for I waite sometimes from morning till night and most times from noone till night. This I assure you is true although i desire you will kcepc it as privato as yon can, takeing no noyco you have heard any such thing, and that for special reasons Only one member returned. 30 MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOR LUDLOW. When the Terme is ended, I purpose to come down (God willing) if you order not the contrary, so with tender of my deere respects and service to you and the rest of the Corporation I remaine " Your faithfull servant, "Jo. Aston." The Plot alluded to in this letter was, doubtless, the Gerard and : Vowell Plot, for participation in which Somerset Foxe, a Ludlow man, V and afterwards M.P. for the Borough, was condemned to death, but reprieved. 1659. (46) JOB CHARLTON and (47) SAMUEL BALD W YN. Elected January, 1658-9. There is no return in the official lists but this is taken from the local records. (46) Sir Job Charlton (born 1614) was a son of Eobert Charlton of Whitton, a prominent goldsmith of London, who suflered much for his loyalty to Charles I. Job Charlton was a most distinguished man. He matriculated at Magdalen Hall, Oxford, 1632, aged 17 ; ben came B.A. 1632, was a barrister 1633, became Serjeant-at-law 166C, Chief Justice of Chester 1662, knighted 1662, and was elected Speaker of the House of Commons 1673, with a pension of <£1,000 a year. In 1680 he was induced to resign the Chief Justiceship of Chester to make way for the notorious Judge Jeffreys (also a Burgess of Ludlow) when he was made a Judge of the Court of Common Pleas. In 1686 he was removed from the Bench for giving judgment agains; the dispensing power of the king, but was afterwards re-appointed Chief Justice of the Court of the Marches, and had a patent to wear a judge's robe. He was created a baronet in 1686, and in 1687 enter- tained King James II. at his residence, Ludford House. Sir Job Charl- ton re-founded the Ludford Hospital. He was Recorder 1675 to 1692, and was an Alderman of Ludlow. He was a descendant of Sir John Charlton, Chief Justice in the reign of Edward I., and an ancestor of the Charltons who held Ludford down to 1854, when it passed to the Lechmeres, their kinsfolk, and subsequently to other kinsfolk, the Parkinsons, the present owners. In 1667 he purchased Ludford House, which had formed a part of the Hospital of St. John, founded by a Burgess of Ludlow in the 13th century. He and Sir Thomas Walcot (No. 53 below) were the trustees of Lane's Charity in Ludlow, and built the first Workhouso there out of their trust funds. In 1662 he (Sir J. Charlton) received a grant of £3,700 for services rendered to Charles I. He was married in Ludlow Church to Dorothy Blunden on 31st March, 1645. He died 24 May, 1697, aged 83, and his monument is still in Ludford Church. (47) Sru Samuefj Ualdwyn (born 1618, and baptised at Burwarton), was til© son of Char Ids lialdwyn (No. 42 above). Ho was a very distinguished lawyer. He matriculated at Balliol College, Oxford, 1634, was admitted to Inner Temple 1646, Bencher 1662, Serjeant-at-law MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOR LUDLOW. 31 1670, King's Serjeant (corresponding to Attorney-General) 1672. He was knighted 1G72-3, February. Ho married Elizabctli Walcott 1648. During the Civil Wars he held Stokesay Castle, which was garrisoned for the King. He died 15 July, 1683,, and was buried in the Temple I Church, where there is a tablet to his memory, on which he is ^described as of Stoke Castle. This he held on a long lease from jLord Craven. His son was member for Ludlow 1681 and 1688 (No.