HARVARD UNIVERSITY ey Ls LIBRARY OF THE Museum of Comparative Zoology HARVARD COLLEGE | LIBRARY MUS. COMP. ZOOL | LIBRARY JUN 17 1958 HARYZED “Hey VERSITY ie) fai: ¥ anid er ' TRANSACTIONS OF THE TYNESIDE NATURALISTS’ FIELD CLUB. 1863-64. VOLU MEV I. Aelwcastle-upon-Gyne : F. & W. DODSWORTH, COLLINGWOOD STREET. 1864, LIBERAL MUS COMPR ZQ0LUGY, CAN BDRIDGEE, MAS HARVARD COLLEGE LIBRARY INGRAHAM FUND © $1927 = o Ree” The Committee of the Tyneside Naturalists’ Field Club beg to state that the Authors alone are responsible for the facts and opinions entertained in their respective Papers. MUS. COMP. Z69L LIBRARY UN 17 1958 HARVARD URIVER SITY A p j L : f a + 2 : ij a Ae ' % Je rad iWiiad We * Fj } » ff # i Bir sg id a 2 N ; z R es : T LA SS ‘ wer TRANSACTIONS OF TILE TYNESIDE NATURALISTS FIELD CLUB. P<, ee ADDRESS TO THE MEMBERS OF THE TYNESIDE NATURALISTS’ FIELD CLUB, READ BY THE PRESIDENT, THE REV. WILLIAM GREENWELL, M.A., AT THE SEVENTEENTH ANNIVERSARY MEETING, HELD ON THURS- DAY, THE 19TH OF MARCH, 1863. GEeNTLEMEN—I feel that some apology is due from me, in ad- dressing you as President of a Naturalists’ Field Club, when I can lay claim to no greater acquaintance with any branch of Natural History than is possessed by most persons of education at the present day. } My apology is, that I address you as an archeologist, for it is to my knowledge on matters connected with that science, that I owe the distinguished honour of having been elected President of so flourishing a society as the Tyneside Naturalists’ Field _ Club. It may at first sight seem strange, that as Naturalists you should have elected an archeologist for your President, but the anomaly is more apparent than real, for like all other Naturalists’ Field Clubs, the Tyneside has always devoted much consideration to subjects connected with the antiquities of the district. And, indeed, such a conjunction of subjects for investi- gation could scarcely be avoided, when we visit, at almost all our meetings, places as remarkable for the handy-work of man, as for the natural products with which man works and makes. And I must here be allowed most strongly to impress upon our VOL. VI. PT. I. A 2 PRESIDENT’S ADDRESS. members how desirable it is, that they should foster an interest in the relics of our ancestors, and of the early inhabitants of our country; subjects of the deepest moment and of the most enticing character, which relate to the social condition, the know- ledge of art and manufacture, the habits and religion of the different races, which have occupied this district, and whose remains are found so abundantly when once our attention is drawn towards them. Had societies like our own been in existence some years ago, what treasures of architecture, of sculpture, of painting, and of various arts might have been preserved, which are now for ever lost tous! And it is one great use of a Club like ours, that a taste for such pursuits is generated, and that a knowledge is acquired, which, whilst it gives ourselves great pleasure, leads us to preserve for others, and for future ages, those most valuable records which time has stiil left us. And indeed, on subjects like these, almost unlimited opportunities are afforded us, for the district, over which our Club extends its visits and researches, is rich beyond measure in ancient remains. Of the works of those tribes which occupied the land before the Roman invasion, there are found most perfect examples in their fortified places, and in their dwellings, in their peculiar mode of terraced cultivation, and in their manner of sepulture, as shown in the numerous tumuli which still exist untouched by the plough. Of the same people we have the mysterious circular markings on rocks and stones to be more fully considered later on, and great numbers of weapons and implements of stone, bronze and iron, as well as specimens of fictile manufacture and of personal ornaments. Of Roman civilization and power we have relics unsur- passed by any other part of England, for though we have no large and wealthy city to excavate like Wroxeter ( Uriconium), we have, besides numerous military stations and ways, that gigantic work of Roman skill and energy, the wall of Hadrian, with its several adjunctive forts, so learnedly, and at the same time so popularly illustrated by our fellow-member Dr. Bruce. And here I cannot but most cordially thank him for that work, than which I know none more ably, none more completely PRESIDENT’S ADDRESS. 8 executed, and withal, with such simplicity and clearness as to make it a book, which, unlike many on such subjects, may be read with pleasure by all. Of Anglo-Saxon date we have not so much to occupy us as is afforded by some other districts in England. We have no cemeteries like those of Kent, rich in goldsmith’s work of high artistic merit, or of Hast Anglia, with their sepulchral urns, weapons, implements and ornaments. Yet we are not without objects of deep interest of those times. We have the remarkable crypt at Hexham, almost a repetition of one in Ripon Cathedral, cer- tainly of Bishop Wilfrith’s building,* and near to which was discovered, in 1832, a large quantity of Northumbrian money, some thousand stycas of the kings LHanred, Ethelred, and Redulf, and of the archbishops Eanbald and Vigmund; we have also several fragments of crosses of Anglo-Saxon date and work, especially two almost complete ones at Aycliffe, the monk’s stone near Tynemouth,} and portions of two or three at Hexham.t Some remains of what has been called Anglo-Saxon architecture exist at Norton, Billingham, Monk Wearmouth, Jarrow, Oving- ham, Bywell St. Andrew’s, Corbridge, Whittingham, and other places, but it is impossible to say decidedly whether these remains are of pre-Norman times, certainly if not of a date before 1066, they are of one very soon after. A few scattered burials of the Anglo-Saxon period have been discovered; one, a cemetery, supposed to have been attached to a monastic body at Hartle- pool, where, with the skeletons, were found several remarkable grave-stones, with the names of the persons interred engraved upon them, in some cases inrunes; another at Castle Eden, with which occurred a glass vase of curious shape and make, specimens of which have been also found in Kent and Gloucestershire, and in a Frankish place of interment at Selzen near Mayence; another at East Boldon, with which was found a bronze pendant article, * Wilfrith, consecrated Bishop of York, a.D. 664, was a great church builder. He restored the church which Paulinus had built at York, covering the roof with lead, and filling the windows with glass, till then unused in England. He built also the churches at Ripon and Hexham; both extraordinary works for that time. t Probably one of the boundary stones of the Anglo-Saxon sanctuary. t It is quite possible that the two fragments, in the possession of Mr. Fairless, are por- tions of the crosses which stood at the head and foot of the grave of Acca. 4 PRESIDENT’S ADDRESS. ornamented with coloured glass, set in gold. The only burial that has come under my own notice was a sepulchral barrow at Cam- boise, removed last year, in which remained several bodies, with one of which was associated an enamelled bronze fibula and bone comb, both of undoubted Anglo-Saxon work. f hope to be able to give a full account of this discovery in our Transactions. : But the field widens when we come to medieval times. In remains of ecclesiastical and civil buildings the district abounds. The cathedral church of Durham, with the remains of the various monastic buildings there, may claim the first place, and we have noble examples of the skill and taste of our early architects in the conventual buildings of Finchale, Tynemouth, Hexham, Brinkburn, Hulne, and Holy Island, and in St. Nicholas’ Newcastle, Darlington, Staindrop, St. Andrew’s Auckland, Hartlepool, Lanchester, Easington, and numerous other most valuable examples of collegiate or parochial churches. As might be expected, from the neighbourhood of the borders, in castellated buildings, the two counties of Northumberland and Durham afford remarkable instances; without considering Norham, which is rather beyond our limits, there are the great castles of Alnwick, Warkworth, Newcastle, Prudhoe, Durham, Raby, and Barnard Castle, and the smaller ones of Chillingham, Edlingham, Bothal, Langley, Houghton in Tynedale, Witton on the Wear, Ravensworth, and Brancepeth, the two last containing valuable ' portions of old work, though sadly barbarised by modern so called Gothic alterations and additions. Abundant instances of the fortified houses of the smaller gentry are found in the Peel houses, among which may be mentioned Cockle Park Tower, Morpeth, Hexham, Bellister, Blenkinsopp, Thirlwall, Cocklaw, Halton, and Belsay, and many others still remaining in a more or less perfect state. Ayden Castleisa choice and perfect specimen ofa fortified manor house of early date; and Lumley and Hylton Castles, the embattled residences of two of the oldest Durham families, afford us instances of buildings which do not quite fall into the list of castles or Peel towers. Some interesting fragments, little known, remain at Hollingside near Whickham, the old residence of the Hardings. Bishop Auckland possesses, in the palace of PRESIDENT’S ADDRESS. 5 the old Counts Palatine, many fragments of architectural interest, among others the fine, though mutilated chapel, built by Bishop Beck, and in Newcastle and other places we find here and there examples of the houses of the sixteenth and seven- teenth centuries. In Seaton Delaval, where is also, closely adjoin- ing the house, a small early chapel, we have a noble example of the artistic skill of Vanbrugh, the greatest architectural genius who adorned the eighteenth century. All these are within our reach, and cannot fail to give an additional zest to our meetings, whilst we are led to admire therein the skill and science of our forefathers, and by considering their interior domestic arrangements, and ex- terior capabilities for defence, we are enabled to obtain some insight into the social habits and manners of the people who lived in them, and to judge of the relations in which they lived with their neighbours on both sides of the Tweed. But to go back to a period incalculably earlier than any to which I have already referred, to show how intimately arche- ology and the natural sciences are connected, I need only draw your attention to the question which is now causing so much discussion,—that of the antiquity of man upon the earth. The most curious discoveries of flint implements, of human manu- facture, in the drift, associated with remains of animals which have not existed within historic times, has led to much contro- versy, but as yet the facts are too scanty to allow any decided conclusion to be arrived at. Of one thing there can be no doubt, that the implements in question are of man’s handywork; anyone who has seen them might as well say that the steel pen he writes with was accidental, as that these remarkable relics are formed by natural fracture and cleavage. Nor indeed can I see any ground for a denial of the fact, that the animals, whose remains are found in the drift, and the people who produced the flint implements were cowval. It does not appear on most careful examination,. by competent and various geologists, that the deposit in which they are found is a secondary one, caused by the breaking up of two distinct strata, each of which had its several ‘and separate remains, or, as it has been asserted, that the flint implements have worked down to the lower stratum in which 6 PRESIDENT’S ADDRESS. they are now found, from a higher one in which they had been at first deposited. On the contrary, all the investigations which have taken place shew, most distinctly, that the human and animal remains have been laid side by side at the same time and by the same agency. The great question which has yet to be settled is this—at what period was the drift in which the flints are found deposited? And side by side with this is another im- portant query—down to what time did these now extinct animals occupy any part of our continent? Unquestionably the time of this deposit was a very remote one, to speak in an historical and not a geological sense. Near Abbeville the flints and bones are found some fifteen or twenty feet below the surface, whilst Gallic and Roman remains, deposited some 2000 years ago, are found a few feet from the present level of the soil, above the undisturbed stratum, which contains these still more ancient relics; that stratum bearing unmistakeable evidence, from its position with regard to the present level of the river basin in which it exists, and from other geological facts, such as the appear- ances of ice-action, of a vast lapse of time having occurred since its deposit. In our own country, under very similar circum- stances, the like remains have been found. In Gray’s Inn Lane, London, at Reculver in Kent, in Bedfordshire, and more especi- ally at Hoxne in Suffolk, many flint implements, identical with the French specimens, and like them associated with bones of Elephas primigenius, Rhinoceros tichorhinus, §c., have been found in beds, posterior to the deposit of the glacial period, named the boulder clay. In caverns also, the same implements and also human bones have been found, both on the continent and in England, associated with the bones of animals, long since extinct, such as the cave bear ( Ursus speleus), the cave lion (Felis spelea), the mammoth, (Elephas primigenius.) We have lately had a discovery, at Heathery Burn Cave, near Stanhope, of human and animal remains associated together, and alike enclosed beneath a layer of stalagmitic matter, but in this case the bones are of animals which inhabited our district to within a few centuries ago, such as the wolf, the wild boar, and roe-deer, and the implements of human manufacture are of a date scarcely earlier than our era, and probably of one a century or two later. I have PRESIDENT’S ADDRESS. 7 in preparation a full account of this valuable find, which I hope before long to bring before our Club. The attention of our members being drawn to this subject, I think it probable that some facts may occur in our own district» which will bear upon this most deeply interesting subject. It is not impossible that in deposits, within our limits, similar to those in which they have occurred in France and in the south and other parts of England, some of these singular implements may be found, and I trust our members will keep their eyes and ears well open to any discovery of flint articles, whether they be of the ruder kind, like those above mentioned, or of the more elaborate and highly polished kind, the relics of a much later yet still early period. Having justified, I hope, the appointment of ‘an archeologist to your Presidential chair, I will now pass to a short.account of the various places we visited and the objects we noted on our field meetings during the past year. Tur First Mzetine, on May 29, was at Finchale Abbey and Durham. The members met at the Leamside station of the North-Eastern Railway, and from there walked to Finchale, crossing the river Wear by a colliery railway bridge, a few yards below which are the remains of the first habitation of Godric, the saint of Finchale. Bishop Flambard, about the year 1110, had granted this spot to Godric, who, having been merchant and sailor and having visited many holy places, among others, Jeru- salem, at last settled down toa life of themost complete mortification and solitude, literally fulfilling the command to sell all he had, and give to the poor, and follow Christ. No more remarkable instance of the ascetic can be found in the whole annals of christian heremitical life than that of Godric; he lived here, cultivating the small plot of ground, whence he obtained his sustenance, subject to the inroads of wild beasts and of men not less savage, to the flooding of his hut by the overflowing of the Wear, and adding, to all these miseries from without, the self inflicted torments of flagellations, vigils, of coarse and unwhole- some food, for he mixed his half-crushed grain with ashes, and never eat the herbs, which he gathered round his dwelling, until they became fetid by long keeping. ‘The stone, which served 8 PRESIDENT’S ADDRESS. him for a table, became his pillow during the short intervals he allotted to sleep, and whole nights were passed by him, during the frosts of winter, immersed up to his neck in the half frozen river. He died in 1170, having removed to the site of the present ruin, sometime previously, on account of its more favour- able position. Bishop Flambard had, before his death, granted the place to the monks of Durham, and two of the body had occupied the cell after Godric’s death. On the failure of Henry Pudsey, son of Bishop Pudsey, to establish a monastery, in con- nection with the Augustinian church of Gisborough, at Baxtanford, on the Browney, about a mile from Durham, he transferred, in 1196, the land, which he had granted to those ecclesiastics, to Finchale, and hence arose the establishment at that place. Finchale,* deriving its name from the corner or elbow of the river on which it is situated, possesses that beauty of position which characterizes most monastic places. To secure warmth, shelter is required, and hence steep rocky banks, clothed with wood, so frequently hem in the buildings; a river is almost demanded by the requirements of a monastic body, for fish formed a staple article of their food,t and hence to the charm of rock and foliage is added the soft murmuring of streams, and the placid reflection of sky, clouds and sunshine in the still waters. Of the original building, of Norman times, nothing was ulti- mately retained but the tomb of St. Godric, which was situated under the large window at the east end of the south transept, built in 1266. The ruins, as they now exist, are the remains of the building commenced in 1242 and finished about 1268, and form 'a valuable specimen of the architecture of that day, though of a very * Most of our old towns possess a Fenkle or corner street. + The river Wear then abounded in salmon, for no impassable lock existed at Lumley, and the streams were not polluted with lead and coal washing, or by the foul overflowing of collieries. Now that the question of re-stocking our rivers with that most valuable and delicious fish, the salmon, occupies so much attention, a few notes as to the quantity of fish that was formerly taken in the Finchale fishery may not be without use. In 1348 the monks sold fish to the amount of £9 12s. 8d, and this we must remember was over and above the consumption within the house; in 1355 they received from the sale of salmon £11 2s. 1d., and to show the value of money in the same year, for three cows and a bull they received 32s.; in 1358 for salmon £12 5s. 6d., and for a cow and a calf 10s.; in 1438 £16 for salmon; and in 1441 £14 6s. 3d. for salmon, whilst for 35 quarters 3 bushels of barley, and 42 quarters 4 bushels of oats they gave £6 11s. 6d, PRESIDENT’S ADDRESS. 9 simple and unornate kind. Soon after the erection of the church, the aisles, for some cause, which we cannot now understand, were removed, and the arches being blocked up, windows of a date about 1365 were inserted, one of which still remains. Several relics of the domestic part of the monastery, and of the Prior’s lodging, of various dates, exist, more or less perfect, and the old park wall, with its characteristic masonry, and some traces of the entrance gateway, are found to the south of the buildings. After leaving Finchale, the members proceeded up the stream of the Wear, by Kepier Wood to Durham, passing through wooded glades, rich, at their various seasons of flowering, in the scarlet lychnis, the veronica, myosotis, wild garlic, and hyacinth. The site of Kepier Hospital, founded by Bishop Flambard in 1112, was visited.* The only portion of the building which is left is the gateway, a piece of fourteenth century work, in which was noticed, in a row of sunk quatrefoils above the archway, the remains of coloured plaster, a very unusual feature in English work, At Durham the members visited the Cathedral and Castle, which are both too well known to require comment, and which would, if noticed at all, require more space than the limits of my address allow. In the library attached to the Cathedral they inspected the large collection of Roman altars and inscriptions from various stations in the district, and the very valuable articles of Anglo-Saxon date, taken from the tomb of St. Cuthbert, amongst them the gold pectoral cross, probably a reliquary, and a portable altar, both personal relics of the saint. The cross is a choice specimen of Anglo-Saxon goldsmith’s work, and is of the same style of workmanship as some of the rich broaches found in the Kentish cemeteries. The beautiful stole and maniple of embroidery, worked by command of