OE Cpe ae afr MEF i ae eet tee Atel > ” Pe es t v 7 = = 7 Se ART TAA OE A AOD LT tel p tS mY a they MP " ; needa we va a r - . ne TT na Bn ee Ee ee ee I eh cm te ; }- : . : ; ‘ - ‘ + ‘ ae ae aad tS Et te te mr rat hee , ol " an . ty : == : * : zs we . en lets Me ee ee eh ede alg Nat ; ; . . . = | a a es HOU Na led Laren lt ng nie wcrc . 7 | = | ramen poebew ite htt Ny ¥ ‘ “mY : oN “4 ; . . . mene canee . 2 . oe ; ~ ay Sco ar Ce ee kn ates chodediad ; oe tak 2, deem ehaieedl oie Pr ee RPO IA a bey tee “ rise ~~ ie: he . too rr ee Aer, a »% & >t sf *’ PSR i s E3 OS ee of + ere Maines ® aged veoh pa ed ; . ere wt py ; : Se Te Ope. > migra. ~ 3 ter, 0, gt ook LIBRARY OF THE Museum of Comparative Zoology ety ~'J Le “4 ‘ Spor e+ es — ae , tay AND PROCEEDINGS. = AND “REPORT a . OF THE OAL SOCET of SOUTH AUSTHALIA a _ (INCORPORATED). 4 a ee i ot, xe KIL: ee i [Wits EicHTexn PLates AND Forty-two FIGURES IN THE TExtT. ] coe x Ris; by j , = % i. : se a ra th . : RED G Bont, PRICE, NINE SHILLINGS. ' Ba F a relaine: : iW. ©. RIGBY, 74, KING WILLIAM STREET. DECEMBER, 1908. " Cheapside, London.” - 34 ry TEM ater & PY ‘ Pears ‘ ee. | (01d ‘ei TRANSACTIONS AND PROCEEDINGS RE PO RT ROYAL SOCIETY of SOUTH AUSTRALI rs. Se ee Ee [With E1G¢HTEEN PLATES AND Forty-two FIGURES IN THE TEXT. ] - EDITED BY WALTER HOWCHIN, FE.GS. PRICE, NINE SHILLINGS. Adelaide : W. ©. RIGBY, 74, KING WILLIAM STREET. DECEMBER, 1908. Parcels for transmission to the Royal Society of South Australia from Europe and America should be addressed “per W. C. Rigby, care Messrs. Thos. Meadows & Co., 34, Milk Street, Cheapside, London.” Rapal Society of South Australia (INCORPORATED). Patron: HIS EXCELLENCY SIR GEORGE R. LEHUNTE, K.C.M.G. — ag — OFFICERS FOR 1408-4. Presioent : JOSEPH: C. VERCO, M.D. FRC: Vice=Presidents: PROF. E. H. RENNIE, M.A., D.Sc., F.C.S. REV. THOMAS BLACKBURN, B.A. tbon. Treasurer: WALTER RUTT, C.E. bon. Secretary and Sealholder: G. G. MAYO, CE. Members of Council: W. HOWCHIN, F.G.S. (Editor and Representative Governor) W. B. POOLE. . R. S. ROGERS, M.A., M.D. SAMUEL DIXON. W. H. SELWAY. E. ASHBY. Fluditor : J: S>LhOXD, FE AsSoAs Cuee i Est Ne ES se Page. Brage, Prof. W. H., and Dr. J. P. V. Mapsen: An Experi- mental Investigation of the Nature of the y Rays. No. 1. Rogers, Dr. R. S.: Description of a New Species of Orchid Mapsen, Dr. J. P. V.: The Ionization Remaining in Gases after Bore from the Influence of the Ionizing Agent Brace, Prof. W. H., and Dr. J. P. V. Mapsen: An Experi- mental Investigation of the Nature of the y Rays. No. u. Turner, Dr. A. J.: New Australian his aR of the Families Noctuide and Pyralidz ..: Lower, O. B.: New Australian Lepidoptera. ‘No. xxv. ... WooLNovuGH, Dr. W. G.: Notes on the Geology of the Mount Lofty Ranges, Chiefly the Portion East of the Onka- paringa River. Plates i. and ii. Baker, W. H.: Notes on Some Species of the Tsopod Family Sphxromidee, from the South Australian Coast. Plates a TO 2G. Pee = any Mapsen, Dr. J. P. V.: Secondary y Radiation | VERCO, Dr. J. C.: Notes on South Australian Marine Mol- lusea, with Descriptions of New Species. Part vill. Plates xi. to xiii. ae Lea, A. M.: Descriptions of Australian Curculionide, with Notes on previously-described Species. Part vi. Mawen, J. H.: A Contribution to the Botany of South Australia Biers, A. : Description of a hitherto Undescribed Species of Shark from Investigator Strait : ————— A Synopsis of the Fishes of South Australia. Pariys: A Synopsis of the Fishes of South Australia. Part: i. : Beage, Prof. W. H.:- On a Want of Symmetry shown by Secondary X-Rays. (Abstract.) .. Brace, Piof. W. H., and J. L. Guasson: On a Want of Symmetry shown by Secondary X-Rays ... Lower, O. B.: Descriptions of New yi cas Hesperiadz —__—— New Australian Tortricina Cuapman, Prof. R. W.: The Strength of South Australian Timbers... sé Verco, Dr. J. C.: Notes on 1 South Australian Marine Mol- lusca, with Descriptions of New Tec Part ix. Plates xiv. to xviil. Brackpurn, Rev. T.: Further Notes on | Australian Coleop- tera, with Descriptions of New Genera and aig Mo, XXxXvili. ‘ 2, i Ns. er a , ABSTRACT OF PROCEEDINGS ... ANNUAL REPORT : BALANCE-SHEET EnpowMeEnt FunD Donations To THE LIBRARY. List or Fettows, Erc. ar APPENDICES. Annual Report, etc., of Field Naturalists’ Section ... Twentieth Annual Report of the Native Fauna and Flora Protection Committee of the Field Naturalists’ Section Annual Report, etc., of the Malacological Section . i ents: ete., of the Microscopical Section ... naex 56 ~e. iavk See aoate ara ms 1 ll 12 = Pepe aie. Baar TF eG ae bow ES ORES a a eS TO NOLeee it bagkiort®s tee arose 199 11 Bats Aenmetiesis df | RED, RO Uke IGT Ost BT. eae Si Hoek weeetdeh: aad a warn be RAREQAMS oF oh he tl bag. ' 7 ay / At at adi ty) (ise a1) \f RS ave wh) Fi) Tess epee a: 1) Sept si) O70) J . tate 5) } s. Ou gael: idtestey with & ek Es 0) OS EE Ai) Ses. oN é "Tis h2 t Pais J ie (tea ave re. a. ad i) per Ay ; { pel ee A asi: ; 7 1) sve 3: vite” Viti) b Aaipey “. Toh ee ree ar! ATO rey / , . Zara h ; f ; Th Foor Te) é ee theye poe I hte) | ey her suLaitey) , Kies } Thy 't F eee ' ‘ - > 4 se r yi Pe en ea be a, aM AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE NATURE OF THE y RAYS.—NO. 1. By W. H. Brace, M.A., F.R.S., Elder Professor of Mathe- matics and Physics in the University of Adelaide, and J. P. V. Manpsen, D.Sc., Lecturer on Electrical En- gineering. [Received January 2, 1908; read May 5, 1908.1] In papers recently published in the ‘Proceedings of the Royal Society of South Australia” (May and June, 1907) and in the “Philosophical Magazine” (October, 1907) an at- tempt was made to show that the ether-pulse theory of y and X-rays might prove to be incorrect after all, and that most of the known properties of these rays could be explained more simply and directly on the supposition that they were material and consisted of neutral pairs. The arguments were based on comparison of known phenomena with deduc- tions from each of the two opposing hypotheses. At that time there did not seem to be any opportunity of appeal to a decisive experiment. The object of this paper is to give a preliminary account of an investigation which appears to us to give a final answer as regards the 7 rays, and to show that they are material in nature. Secondary radiation, which is excited in an atom by a passing wave or pulse, must be distributed symmetrically with regard to a plane passing through the atom perpendicu- lar to the direction of motion of the pulse. If we speak of the primary pulse as going forwards, the secondary radia- tion is just as likely to go backwards as forwards. This is a well-recognized principle. For example, J. J. Thomson divides the secondary radiation, due to 7 rays, into two equal parts, which he supposes to move away symmetrically in opposite directions, and, for convenience of calculation, paral- lel to the direction of the primary rays (Cond. of Electricity through Gases, p. 406). Supposing, therefore, a pencil of y rays to pass normally through a plate so thin that its absorption may be neglected, the secondary radiation should be exactly the same on the two sides of the plate—in amount, in quality, and in distribution; and it ought not to be pos- sible to discover, by any comparison of the secondary radia- tions on the two sides, which is the face of entry and which of emergence. A 2 Consider now the ionization-chamber represented in fig. 1. The two ends are closed by plates, of which A and A’ are alike; so also are B and B’. The substance of A and A’ is different to that of B and B’. The nature of the side walls is immaterial. A pencil of y rays passes along the axis of the chamber, which is re- presented by a dotted line. The ionization current. within the chamber is measured as usual by inserting a high potential electrode | Fig. i connected to an electroscope. When the plates 4 and B are inverted, there is a change in the amount of the current; so also when A’ and B’ are inverted. By an extension of the principle already stated, it ought not to be possible, on the ether-pulse theory, to dis- cover which way the rays are going, up or down in the fig- ure, by comparing the consequence of inverting A and B with that of inverting 4’ and B’. As a matter of fact, the direction can be discovered with ease; the more easily the greater the difference between the atomic weights of A and B. For example, in one experiment of ours the chamber was of cylindrical form, 3 inches 1 1 i ‘ | A 6) high and 10 inches diameter. 7 The plates used were of alumin- ium and lead. The thickness of ; each plate was a little less than | cf = 2mm. Inversion of the top plates Ad Po SS “ante <---> _——_—::-* A and B made a _ difference in p——— favour of Al of less than 1 per cent., 2.e., the current was slightly larger when Al was next the chamber. On the other hand, inversion of the kottom plates made a difference of 44 per cent. in favour of Pb, 2¢., the current was 44 per cent. larger when the Pb was on top. The details are shown in the figure. Allowance was made for all radiation other than that which proceeded down the conical opening in the lead block. It may be well to point out that this effect cannot be ascribed to any complication due to secondary or tertiary rays. No doubt the radiation in the chamber is very com- plex; but the fact is immaterial. Provided that the cham- ber is symmetrical in the first place, then the secondaries 3 must be symmetrical also if the ether-pulse theory is cor- rect, and therefore the tertiaries and so on. Nor is it neces- sary to consider whether the secondary radiations are B rays or scattered y rays. Also, it must be remembered that the secondary radiations which enter the chamber have their origin almost entirely in a very few millimetres of material bordering on the chamber. Therefore, the y rays are in almost exactly the same condition, both as to quality and as to quantity, when they excite secondary radiations from the top plate as they enter the chamber, and secondary radia- tions from the bottom plate as they leave. The details of the experiment may be varied greatly ; but in all the cases we have tried the want of symmetry is obvious. Jn fig. 3 are shown the details of one other case, in which carbon and lead were the materials used, and the form of the (/) Curent untl plate Bomieed au. alent = S98. (2) " Sih | A akect 02 eevrordadt -5-- 3. = SLL (3) Qe cult) but base PQ hauged Gcavtrn = SOF Fig. 3. chamber was different. It seems unnecessary to give more, because, in the first place, the experiments are easy to re- peat; and in the second place, the complete quantitative analysis of the figures depends on several factors, the influ- ence of which is imperfectly understood, such as the previous screening of the rays, the form of the pea ber: and the re- spective parts played by the original y rays, cathode rays, and secondary y rays, if any such exist. The experiments, as they stand, show how far away is that symmetry which the ether- pulse ‘theory demands. It seems to us that there is no escape from the conclusion that the y rays are not ether pulses. Let us, therefore, proceed to consider the hypothesis that the y rays are material. In the paper already mentioned, it was argued that they might well consist of neutral pairs, liable to be broken up on encountering atoms or parts of A2 4 atoms; and that the secondary cathode radiations might be the negative particles thus set free. Let us suppose, provi- sionally, that the particles, when set free, move at first in the direction of the y stream, but are subsequently scattered in the usual manner of B rays. [It is_ here that the absence of symmetry arises. On the pulse theory the particles should go equally backwards and forwards; indeed, if they were ejected by atomic explosions, the result of energy accumulated from passing pulses, as sug- gested by J. J. Thomson in the case of X-rays, they would move equally in all directions. | Wigger gives a table (Jahrbuch der Radioaktivitaét, Bd. il., p. 431) showing that the y rays are absorbed according to a density A BC D law pretty strictly, except for small thicknesses of substances of large P atomic weight. ee lll Assume this law to hold good, and also assume for the present that the ab- A’ BCD sorption of 8 rays follows the density Pp law. The latter is only roughly true, of ___|__ course ; but we may deal with quanti- ties in a broad fashion first, and make the proper amendments afterwards. Fig. 4. We can now compare the quan- tities of cathode radiation which should emerge from the far sides of two plates of different densities p and p’. Let these be represented by AD and A’'D' in the figure, and let BC and B'C" be corresponding strata of equal weight: in fact, let AB/A'’B’=BC{B'C' =CD/(CD =p (ae the plates be crossed by equal pencils of y rays, as shown in the figure. A certain quantity of y radiation is absorbed in crossing BC’. In the language of our present hypothesis we should say that a certain number of y particles are stripped of their positives, and the negative remainders go on. An equal number of negatives are set free in B’'C’ because the two strata are of equal weight. Of those set free in BC only a certain number emerge from the face D, because of the absorption of the plate CD. Since CD and C’'D’ are of equal weight, a similar absorption occurs in the case of the particles set free in B’C’. Thus the same number emerge from each plate. Integrating for all effective strata, the whole cathode radiations emerging from the two plates are equal. We thus find that if the absorption of 8B and y rays both followed the density law, the secondary cathode radiation on the far side of a plate—we may call it the ‘““emergence”’ radia- 5 tion—would be the same for all materials. There should be no such relation between the amount of the radiation and the atomic weight of the plate, as various observers have shown to be true for the secondary cathode radiation of ‘incidence,’ a relation which is closely parallel to that found in the case of 8 rays. Experiment is in agreement with this theory, for it shows that no such relation exists in respect to the emergence radia- tions; in marked contrast to what happens in the case of the radiations from the front sides of plates of various mate- rials, the incidence radiations. It is true that the emergence radiations are not all equal, but this is to be expected, because (1) the amount of second- ary cathode radiation depends, as Kleeman has shown, on the previous screening of the y rays; (2) the B rays are not ab- sorbed strictly according to a density law; (3) the y rays also depart from this law. We have made no serious attempt as yet to disentangle the effects of these various disturbing factors. In fact, the task promises to be long and intricate, for it will be necessary to find out how much of the ioniza- tion in the chamber is due to each class of rays; to discover the law of distribution of the radiations in space, so that the form of the chamber may be allowed for, if necessary; to find out the nature of the departures from the density law of those 8 and y rays which are in question; and so on. Nevertheless, the results are satisfactory, so far as we have gone. The amount of emergence radiation is found to depend on the previous screening of the rays. In one case the in- version of a C, Pb pair of plates from C, Pb to Pb, C, altered the current in the ratio 1:1:11 when the rays had been pre- viously screened by Pb; but in the ratio 1 :°96 when the screen was changed to C. Again, when the rays had previously pass- ed through an iron screen, the inversion Pb Fe to Fe Pb changed the current in the proportion 1:1°12, but when a lead screen was substituted for an iron one the change was 1:1°04. In illustration of the effect of the second disturb- ing factor mentioned above, we have found that, other things being equal, the substances of small atomic weight give the most secondary radiation, in a general way; and it may be no coincidence that in some cases we have found Sn and Fe to give surprisingly small amounts. This is in agreement with what is to be expected, for it is clear, on consideration of the argument already given, that the greater the B ray absorption of a substance in proportion to its density, the less “emergence” radiation should issue from it. Some observers have found Sn and Fe to possess exceptional absorbing pow- ers. We do not wish, however, to lay any stress upon these 6 last observations, some of which we may not have interpreted correctly ; but we mention them in order to show that the ine- qualities that are found to exist between the emergence radia- tions of various substances promise to be reducible to order as soon as the difficulties of interpretation have been sur- mounted. Let us now consider the cathode radiations on the front sides of the plates. Of the cathode particles set free in BU and moving at first in the direction of the y rays, a certain proportion, say p, is returned by what is beyond. These move towards the face A, and a certain number of them succeed in reaching it and emerging therefrom. In the case of the other plate the proportion returned is p’. The absorption in B'A' is the same as in BA, because the weights are the same. Comparing the two plates, stratum by stratum, we find that the “incidence” radiation of one plate is to the ‘nci- dence radiation of the other plate as p to p’. Now p and p' are the well-known constants of the B rays. : When a stream of y rays is allowed to fall upon a plate the cathode radiation which issues from the place of inci- dence must be divisible into two parts. One consists of scat- tered B particles derived from the stream of such particles which was travelling with the y rays before incidence, and which was formed during the previous transit of the screens employed, solid, liquid, or gaseous. This part is scattered to an extent which depends on the atomic weight of the plate, according to the usual law of B particles. The other part, is originated in the plate itself in the manner just described, and the amount of it is also regulated according to the B ray law. When, therefore, observers have measured the second- ary radiation, due to y rays, and have found a law corre- sponding to that for B rays, the reason of the correspondence has been that they really were measuring the secondary radia- tion due to B rays. Properly speaking, the secondary radia- tion, produced by y rays, or, rather, from y rays, is propor- tional to the density of the substance traversed (cf. Wigger’s table), and this is only another form of the law of absorption of yy rays. The relative importance of the two parts of the incidence radiation just mentioned must depend on the circumstances of the experiment.) The researches of Kleeman (Phil. Mag., Nov., 1907) show very well how the second part, which is influenced by previous screening, modifies the effect of the (1) In a recent letter addressed by one of us to ‘‘Nature,”’ too great a preponderance was assigned to the first part under all circumstances. 7 first part, which is not so influenced, but which follows the law of B rays strictly. It is easy to show, by comparing corresponding strata at the front and back of one plate, that the incidence radia- tion should be somewhat less than p times the transmitted radiation. Somewhat less, because the cathode radiation, which is turned back, is scattered and softened in the process. To sum up:—On the ether-pulse theory we ought to find perfect symmetry in the secondary radiations from the two sides of a plate. But experiment shows nothing of the kind. On the material or neutral-pair theory, the “incidence’’ radiations should follow the 8 ray law. This is known to be the case. The emergence radiations should not follow the B ray law, and experiment shows that they do not. If the density law held for both 6 and y rays, and if the y rays were homogeneous, the emergence radiations should all be equal. As already explained, experiment shows that the ob- served inequalities give promise of ready explanation, on the ground that no one of these suppositions is quite true. It is, perhaps, better not to extend the preliminary ac- count of these experiments by any lengthy discussion of the . issues arising from them. Many points that invite considera- tion have been discussed already in the papers first referred to. Moreover our own further experiments are incomplete, and their full interpretation is not yet certain. We will, therefore, confine ourselves to one or two questions which seem of special interest. The X-rays resemble the y rays so closely. that it is practically inconceivable that the two radiations should be essentially different. The secondary cathode radia- tions, which are set free when X-rays impinge on any mate- rial, must therefore have been part of the X-ray stream, and must start their independent existence by moving on in the line of the X-ray motion. Their velocity is much smaller than that of the secondary cathode rays due to y rays, and they are much more readily scattered. It may still remain an open question whether or no the X-ray stream contains ether pulses. Perhaps their existence must be supposed in order to explain the velocity experiment of Marx, and the diffraction experi- ment of Haga and Windt. Possibly they are also required in order to explain Barkla’s polarization experiments; but we do not think that the experiment described by Barkla in “Nature” (October 31, 1907) is in any way decisive. It seems proper to consider a possibility that the nega- tive particle, when it moves on in the original line of motion of the pair from which it came, retains also its original velo- city. It is a striking fact that the cathode particle, due to the y rays, has the same speed, very nearly, as the B particle 8 issuing from the original radioactive material. And it looks quite unlike a coincidence that similar comparisons can be made in the case of the X-rays. The secondary cathode radia- tions due to these rays have velocities which, at the least, are of the same order as the velocities of the cathode particles in the X-ray bulb. If we examine the table given by Innes (Proc. Roy. Soc., Aug. 2, 1907, p. 461), and if we may be allowed to adopt an interpretation differing somewhat from the author’s, but more natural, it seems to us, in view of the conclusions of this paper, we find that the velocities of the electrons emitted by all the metals are practically the same, zinc being an exception, because it is unable to break up the hardest rays. We find that the velocities range from about 6x 10° to 75x 10° for soft rays, and 6x10° to 8x10° for hard rays. Remembering that bundles of X-rays are very heterogeneous, the natural conclusion seems to be that the softest rays give the slowest speeds, and that the velocity of the secondary rays increases with the hardness of the X-rays from which they are derived.'?) Now the hardness of the rays grows with the speed of the cathode particles in the bulb. Is it then possible that the cathode particle is first set in motion by the electromotive force in the bulb, strikes the anticathode, and picks up a positive there, becomes neutral, and is now called an X-ray, is subsequently stripped of the positive, and becomes a secondary cathode particle, the iden- tity of the negative remaining the same throughout, and its speed invariable, or nearly so? The difficulty comes in when we try to consider the part played by the mass of the positive. Probably it becomes necessary to consider it as small compared to the mass of the negative. In many ways such a supposi- tion would fit in very well. We should then understand why the positive is so hard to isolate: also a radioactive atom, in ejecting a y particle would not lose appreciably in weight. Lilienfeld believes he has found the positive electron to be less massive than the negative. (Deutsch. Phys. Gesell. Verh., 9, 7, April 15, 1907.) And, again, may not the 8 and y forms be interchange- able at times? A y particle, which had been stripped of its positive, and become a secondary cathode, or 8 ray, would be lost to measurement as a y ray; and we should thus have an explanation of how the y rays are “absorbed,” and why the absorption follows an exponential law. And in the same way, if a B particle picked up a positive, it would disappear from view as a B particle, it would be “absorbed.” eee (2) By independent experiment, Bestelmeyer (Ann. d. Phys., xxii., p. 429, 1907) and Cooksey (Amer. Jour. of Science, Oct., 1907) arrive at the same conclusion. 9 Although we have made a few experiments with mag- netic fields, we have not yet come to any conclusions as to whether or no there are y pairs which have become loosened in the attachment of positive to negative, forming a softer and more ionizing radiation. Their existence might be suspected since there is an analogous effect in the case of X-rays; and probably they would be found more at the back of the pene- trated plate than in front of it. A few further experimental illustrations are shown dia- grammatically in Figs. 5-7, with the explanations attached. ee SAC ——— fl ee oOrs eae 0 aaa WERE & gts for 63 0 : ——— es P| b-----—-—-----4 So Fig. 5 The upper figure shows the general arrangement. The lower figures are diagrammatic, and show the currents for different ar- rangements of the Pb and Al at the bottom of the chamber, and at the top, with the exception of the plate through which the y rays enter. Inverting the top plates makes little difference where the upper of the two plates at the bottom is Al, but an appreciable difference when it is Pb, because in the latter case a good deal of secondary radiation is thrown upwards by the Pb, and there is a tertiary from the top plate. The same, when the conical opening is completely filled by a Pb stopper :— 12°6 12°6 si ear 18°3 The differences show the effects of those rays only which do not pass through the Pb stopper :— 27°7 28-7 39°9 44-7 nt ies WhoiDa. asiuei These show the effect of Tae RPS (Co al inverting that portion only of the top plate Jhe sane, unth Pb shpp=r where the y rays enter. oe ie Three Pb plates=-*55 cm., Al plate =-16 cm Wheel “4-2 Fig. 6. 10 10 Crt : s——=s ae a Ss === === Ss a seni pest eg! ial ' ' cane pe eee meee — === a === === Fig. 7. The upper figure shows the general arrangement. The wall of the cylindrical vessel was of brass; a Pb or an Al lining could be inserted as shown. The lower figures are diagrammatic, and show the currents for different arrangements of Pb and Al at top, bottom, and sides. Inversion of the plates, through which the y rays pass into the chamber, makes little difference; but there is a great alteration if the material is changed on which the y rays fall, or the emergence radiation from the top plate. The base is of less importance than in fig. 5; but the sides of more importance. This should clearly be so, for geometrical rea- sons. When the conical opening was filled by a Pb stopper, the currents were all reduced considerably, but retained the same proportions pretty nearly. On the other hand, when a small pencil of 8 rays was ad- mitted through a hole in the centre of the top plate, a change of the material of the bottom became more effective, and of the sides less effective than before; but this difference became smaller when thin Al sheets were so placed as to scatter the B rays on their entry into the chamber. . In conclusion, we should like to add that Wigger was the first, so far as we know, to show clearly that the secondary radiation of Al, on the far side of the plate, might be greater than that of Pb. A comparison of the emergence radiations of different metals was made by Dawes (Phys. Rev., xx., p. 182), who showed that they did not follow the law of the incidence radiations. The same effect was indicated in the experiments of Eve (Phil. Mag., Dec., 1904). We have little doubt that the interesting experiment of Mackenzie (Phil. Mag., July, 1907) is to be explained on the lines indicated in this paper. In fact, it is clear that this is the case in a broad sense; but it is difficult to give a complete explanation until the laws are so completely worked out that they can be applied to the interpretation of experiments, which are really very compli- cated, although at first sight they may seem to be simple. 11 DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPECIES OF ORCHID. By R. 8. Rocsers, M.A., M.D. [Read November 5, 1907.] Prasophyllum occidentale, sp. nov. Plant.—A somewhat dwarfed species, varying from 5 to 8 in. in height; the fistula in the sheath placed high up, sometimes immediately below the spike. Leaf-lamina greatly exceeding the spike, extending in my smallest specimen 4} in. beyond the fistula, and in my tallest 6 in. beyond this point. The spike not crowded, consisting of from ten to fourteen green flowers. Flowers.—Uateral sepals about 3 lines long, slightly bi. dentate, united except in their distal fourth. Dorsal sepal somewhat shorter (23 lines), erect, acuminate, concave. Late- ral petals-narrow-lanceolate, very slightly shorter than dorsal sepal. Labellum. silo, about 2 lines. iene reflexed about the middle, tip acuminate ; membranous portion fairly wide and shightly crenulated, callous part continues a short distance beyond the bend; does not protrude bibs the free fees we sepals. Column.—Middle lobe quadrangular. Lateral appen- dages about same height as rostellum; unequally lobed, the smaller one being given off about middle of appendage. Stig- matic plate speckled in my specimens. ‘I found this orchid growing close to the shore at Streaky Bay on September 26, 1907. Only four specimens were col- lected, and three of these were seeding, so that it should be looked for at. the beginning of the month. - It bears a superficial resemblance to the Western Aus- tralian form, P. macrostachyum, from which, however, it may be distinguished by its relatively long and narrow petals, by the extent to which its lateral sepals cohere, and by the great length of its leaf- lamina. There is no recorded member of the genus in this State with which it is likely to be confused, unless it be P. fuscum. In this species the lateral sepals are free, whereas in the new form they are connate, a feature which at once makes the diagnosis easy. 7 THE IONIZATION REMAINING IN GASES AFTER REMOVAL FROM THE INFLUENCE OF THE IONIZING AGENT. By J. P. V. Mapsen, D.Sc., B.E. (Read April 7, 1908.] INTRODUCTION. Jn a paper by Professor Bragg and Mr. Kleeman,” a theory of initial recombination was advanced to explain the cause of the lack of saturation in gases exposed to the action of the @ particles of radium. The effect was found to be due to the immediate action between a parent molecule and the electron which was ejected from it as a result of the ionizing influence of the a particle. It was shown that it was easy to reconcile with this theory the result of an experiment described by Professor Rutherford,'?) which suggested that it is easier to obtain the saturation current in a gas when the gas is quickly removed from the influence of the ionizing agent before testing. Rutherford’s experiment would, of course, indicate that the process of initial recombination would be completed in a very short time after a molecule had been ionized. However, as explained in a later paper by Professor Bragg,‘5) it was not essential to the theory of initial recom- bination that the process should be completed within any set time, in which case many important considerations would result. The author undertook the repetition of Rutherford’s ex- periment, and the non-success of some preliminary attempts led to the further suggestion that for a certain length of time it was conceivable that the positive and negative ions might remain in a state of incomplete combination, their final re- combination being precipitated by some change of conditions. The existence of such partially combined pairs of ions would help to explain much of the mechanism of phosphorescence, and would appear to have some connection with the clusters described by J. B. B. Burke,4) which were the product of ionization, and gave rise under some conditions to phosphor- escent glow, contained energy, and yet were not electrified. (1) Trans. Roy. Soc., S.A., vol. xxix., 1905. (2) Phil. Mag., vol. 47, p. 158. (3) Phil. Mag., May, 1906. (4) Phil. Mag., vol. i., p. 342, 1901. 13 Again, in some experiments described by C. D. Child © upon the arc through mercury vapour, clusters very similar in nature to those described by Burke are met with, and their behaviour was only explained on the hypothesis that recom- binations between positive and negative ions were not always complete or stable, and that the clusters so formed were, under suitable conditions, readily broken up, giving rise to ionization. It may not be out of place at this point to remark that the nucleus of such clusters might possibly be formed either by the partial recombination of a positive and a negative ion which have each had time to become attached to neutral molecules of the gas or by the immediate partial recombina- tion of a parent molecule and the electron ejected from it by the process of ionization. Just as this paper was near completion the results of an investigation by Von Erich Barkow ‘® came to hand, in which the existence of neutral pairs of ions, evidently produced in the former manner, offers a ready explanation of the effects observed. It was, however, more with the idea of finding out whether a cluster is formed in the latter way that the work of this present paper was carried out. When two oppositely charged ions, approaching each other, are at. a distance apart “7” (in the present case “r” is of the order of the molecular free pathy) the particles ein revolve in closed orbits around each other, if the kinetic energy due to their relative motion is less than 2 (e being the charge on an ion). An electrical field will tend to disturb this motion, and it is one of the purposes of the present paper to decide whether some such state of semi- combination can persist for an appreciable time, and a separ- ation of the ion be eventually effected by an electrical field, or by a field conjointly with other causes. Returning to the experiment described by Rutherford, little detail information is given in regard to the apparatus used. It is stated that instead of measuring the current with the uranium oxide covering one electrode, the air which had passed over the uranium was forced between two concentric cylinders between which the electromotive force was acting. It seemed probable that the apparatus described by him earlier in the same paper (p. 144) had been used, in which air, after passing through cotton wool and over the uranium surface, was forced through a wire gauze, and then between (5) Phys. Rev., vol. xxii., pp. 221-231, April, 1906. (6) Annalen der Physik, p. 317, No. 7, 1907. 14 two cylinders of 2°8 and 1°6 cms. diameter respectively, a potential difference of 32 volts between the cylinders being found sufficient to completely remove all the ions from the gas. The distance of the gauze from the central electrode and the size of gauze used are not definitely stated. It will be To Elechrorneter Sulphur Insulation To Earth aarp [Uranium U 2) eee Rig. a: shown in the present paper that the form of the saturation curve obtained in such an apparatus depends largely upon these two latter factors, as well as upon the potential differ- ence between the cylinders, and also their size. In attacking the question of the ionization in gases after their removal from the action of the ionizing agent, two direct 15 methods suggest themselves. In the first place; ionized gas may, as in Rutherford’s experiment, be blown into a chamber in which the ions are to be collected by an electric field. In this case care must be taken to enable the ions to be passed rapidly into a uniform electric field, so as not to subject them at first to a weaker field. . | To pass the ionized gas through a fine gauze as Ruther- ford did would appear the most convenient method to adopt in such a case, although, as will be shown later, it by ne means, in all cases, approaches the ideal condition. In the second method, the ionizing agent may be allowed to act upon the gas which is enclosed in a suitable ionization chamber, and then either the chamber or, what is usually more convenient, the ionizing agent may be removed before the electromotive force is applied between the electrodes. Both these methods have been used in the present in- vestigation. Since the shape of the ionization curve obtained in the presence of the ionizing agent is found ‘) to depend upon the effects of both general and initial recombination, it is import- ant, no matter which of the above methods is used, in com- paring the saturation curves with and without the presence of the ionizing agent, to eliminate the effects of general re- combination. Also, diffusion of the ions to conducting sur- faces would produce many of the effects which one might ex- pect to be shown by clusters which could be separated by a sufficiently intense field. § bel Tue ACTION OF GAUZES. The first experiments were carried out with an apparatus as shown in fig. 1. Air was used in these experiments, and after passing through a plug of cotton wool was drawn by a water-pump, with suitable pressure regulator, at a speed of 10 cms. per second, over the surface of uranium oxide. Thence it passed through a gauze and between two cylindrical electrodes of 2 cms. and 4 cms. diameter respectively. The outer electrode was connected to a set of small accumulators, the other terminal of the cells being connected to earth. The central electrode was 10 cms. in length, and was supported in a sulphur plug, which in turn was protected by an earthed ring. By suitable keys the central electrode could be con- nected either to the electrometer or to earth. A Thompson Quadrant Electrometer was used, giving a deflection of 75 scale divisions per volt. (7) Bragg and Kleeman, Trans. Roy. Soc., S.A., vol, xxix., 1905. 16 As a similar form of apparatus has been frequently em- ployed where the introduction of a gauze suggested a ready means of localizing the field which was to be used for collect- ing the ions which were blown along a tube—as, for example, in the experiments of Townsend ) upon diffusion of ions and (9) in experiments upon the ions which are produced from flames, etc.—it is of some additional interest to know what effects may arise from the introduction of such a gauze. A short account will therefore be given of some preliminary ex- Tbk tok $i oe Lok TT Come genders Bev gil ome dan odie Vere hs Saar pea pester | hog peers meer ane ae ba ~ Ss 0D 0G U0 4) 00 0 Figs. 2 and 3. periments in which the size and nature of the gauze and the distance between the central electrode and the gauze were varied. The curves, fig. 2, show the results of experiments with a brass gauze having 40 strands to the inch, two sets of wires being interlaced at right angles to each other, each wire (2) Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., excii., A 1900, pp. 129-158. (9) Langevin and Block, Comptes Rendus, exxxix., 1904, p. 792. 17 being of ‘0065 inches diameter. The curves (A+), (Bt), (C+), show the relation between the potential difference of the electrodes, and the corresponding electrometer deflections per 0°5 minute for distances of 7, 14, and 28 mm. between the gauze and the flat end of the central cylindrical electrode, the gauze being positive to the central electrode. The curves (A —), (B—), (C—), are corresponding curves obtained when the gauze was negative. Fig. 3 shows similar curves using a brass guaze with 20 strands to the inch, each wire being °010 in. in diameter. TABLE A. Diameter of Deflection for 400 volts. Wires, in. Deflection for 50 volts. Material. Strands per in. Brass~x_.... 20 ‘010 1:4 Rrassx ... 11 -0185 1°25 rassx ... 14 °015 1°33 rass x |... 40 “007 L7 Iron x ne 14 °013 125 Iron x “at 21 -016 1°34 Galv. Iron x 14 -0135 1:26 Copper || ... 16 "013 1-14 Copper || ... 32 °013 1°5 x Represents crossed wire-mesh gauzes. || Represents parallel wire gauzes. A large number of other gauzes were similarly tested, in- cluding some which were built in the form of grids, with one set only of straight wires arranged parallel to each other. As figs. 2 and 3 are, however, typical, the results obtained with some of the other gauzes are given in Table A in terms of the deflections per 0°5 minute at potential differences of 400 and 50 volts respectively between the cylinders with the central electrode in all cases 28 mm. from the gauze. The state of the surface of the gauze was found to have little effect, even when the gauze was wetted, and in the case of iron allowed to rust slightly. At intervals during each set of experiments the draught was stopped and a reading taken of the amount of ionization which entered the chamber independently of the draught. No special precautions were taken to dry the air, and on one or two occasions the amount of ionization produced by the uranium showed changes which were apparently due to slight dampness of the uranium surface. This accounted for the reduction in the amount of ionization which was observed on such occasions, as the path of the a particles through the gas would be slightly reduced. it will be observed in both figs. 2 and 3 that there is no very close approach to saturation, although the approach is 18 much closer in fig. 3 than in fig. 2, even when large poten- tial differences are applied between the electrodes. The re- sults with the gauze positive are in all cases larger than with the gauze negative. Also, the number of ions reaching the central electrode in a given time decreases for any given value of potential difference between the cylinders, as the distance ! jes 2 a re, ee | a RE | saling 5 tein en adios hs Meal eh ane 1S) in aa I | ' ' ! \ t , os To Cells + or- | t ' eve} oom ee ! ! | ' ‘ ‘ 1 ' ' ne aes CAs Mercury hap | { ' ; : Ok. expen (ae | . 7o Earth | dl erempnnee= =~ OTL ara a i ae 3 — Es : flectrometer. eet ie a eb nnees | 7 Weer © { | : ; | ury trap | ; uy Tear | ! : ; ace iaae \Nn | ' Al Sulphur | | ! | ' Fe Top Gauze Bers 4) | | oo! @ Middle. « insides th A CORR | Ee oc ee \ | R Bottom . ' / 1 between the gauze and the end of the central electrode is in- creased. When, therefore, even very large potential differ- ences are maintained between the electrodes, the number of ions which reach the central electrode in a given time may give a very false measurement of the number of ions which actually reach the gauze in that time. i It appears from the curves that it is the strength of field in the immediate neighbourhood of the gauze and not. so much the actual difference of potential between the inner and outer cylinders that determines the number of ions received by the central electrode. As in the experiments so far de- scribed, this field was by no means uniform, it was decided to re-design the apparatus so as to provide for this condition. An apparatus as shown in fig. 4 was constructed, hav- ing three gauzes set parallel to each other with their planes at right angles to the axis of the tube. The central gauze, to which the electrometer was connected, consisted of a brass gauze with 20 strands to the inch, each wire being ‘01 in. in diameter, soldered to a thin metal ring and carefully at- tached to a ring of sulphur.in such a way as to allow the air to pass only through the gauze. Earthed metal rings, as shown in the diagram, were found necessary to protect the sulphur from the direct influence of the high-potential plates. On each side of this middle gauze were arranged: gauzes which could be easily replaced, and so that their distance from the middle gauze could be varied. In the first set of experiments these gauzes were of brass with 40 strands to the inch, the distance between the top and middle gauzes being 6°5 mm., that between the bottom and middle gauzes 75 mm.. In fig. 5, curve (A —), is shown the effect. of varying -the potential applied.to the top gauze, always, however, keeping 20 it negative, while maintaining the bottom gauze at a nega- tive potential of 41 volts. A draught of 10 cms. per second was maintained as in the earlier experiments. It will be seen from the curve, that with 50 volts applied to the top gauze, a much larger current passes to the middle electrode than when the top gauze is connected to earth; but that fur- ther increases in the potential of the top gauze cause very little further increase in the current. Curve (4+), in the same figure, shows how the current varies when the bottom gauze is still maintained at a potential of —41 volts, but with the potential of the top gauze varied through a range of positive values. With the bottom gauze at —41 volts, and the top gauze at +500, practically no current passed to the middle electrode—that is to say, a large number of negative ions which would otherwise be drawn to the middle elec- trode are now completely dragged through it. Similar re. sults occurred when the bottom gauze was maintained at a positive potential of 41 volts, the greatest diminution in the current to the middle gauze being observed when the top gauze was made negative. To prevent any interaction of the two fields above and below the middle screen, the gauze was replaced by a screen consisting of two gauzes, similar to the first, set parallel to each other and at a distance apart equal to 2 mm. Curves (B—) and (B+), fig. 5, were then obtained by following out the procedure described in the previous test, from which the curves (A —) and (A+) were derived. The same type of re- sult is obtained, but greatly reduced. Single gauzes with finer mesh produced much the same effect as the double gauze. It appears from these results that when the wider single gauze is used for the central electrode, some of the ions which it should apparently stop are blown completely through it, and more the wider the gauze; but that these are collected by the gauze when the field in the top chamber drives them with sufficient force against the draught. If, then, the top gauze be of the same sign as the bottom gauze, any field in the top chamber greater than about 100 volts per cm. ensures practically all the ions being caught by the middle electrode. In subsequent experiments the top chamber was always so arranged, and the screen of two gauzes was used as the central electrode. The strength of field in the lower chamber was varied and corresponding currents measured. Curves were obtained for depths of bottom chamber, 75 mm., 11°55 mm., and 23°5 mm., respectively. The capacity was determined by an auxil- lary condenser in each case, and after correcting the read- 21 ings for the slight alterations in capacity produced by the change in position of the gauzes, the curves for the different width chambers were found to practically coincide for all except very weak fields. When, therefore, the bottom gauze is negative, we may conclude that for fields stronger than 50 volts per cm. very few, if any, positive ions penetrate far into the bottom cham- ber through the lower gauze; otherwise, effects due to recombination in that chamber should have been observed clearly when the depth of the lower chamber was varied. The smaller values of current, obtained when the bottom gauze was negative and the top positive, were due to the action of the field in the top chamber, more particularly its arrangement in the immediate vicinity of the wires of the middle gauze. Of 8. 6. 2432.40 wires pe lotted line Curves + Crossed Brass Wire Gauzes B20. » 20Strands per - 40 - . In fig. 6 are shown the results obtained with different gauzes for the bottom electrode, and varying fields applied to the lower chamber; the field in the top chamber being maintained, in all experiments, at 100 volts per cm., arranged in such a direction as to prevent the escape of the ions through the middle gauze. The depth of the lower chamber was 11 mm.; the dotted curves are for bottom gauzes of crossed strands of 50, 40, and 20 meshes to the inch re- spectively. The full line curves are for bottom gauzes made of copper-wire ‘016 in. in diameter, set parallel, and equi- 22 distant from each other, and of 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40 wires to the inch respectively. The crossed gauzes give results falling very well into line with those from the paralled wire grid, in which the smaller the mesh the harder it was to obtain saturation. It is not- able that with all the intermediate gauzes..an approach is shown to the same value of. maximum current as the field strength is increased. With very fine gauzes very intense fields would seem. necessary to drag all the ions through the gauze, while with gauzes much broader than about 16 to the inch ions are apparently readily, drawn from distances considerably below the gauze. All the curves given were obtained from results of ex- periments in which the bottom gauze was positive. When it is made negative, and the top gauze also negative, very little difference is found in curves for strong fields : with weak fields the values obtained with the gauze positive are as-a-rule slightly higher than with the gauze negative. Of numerous gauzes tested, the 20 to the inch crossed brass gauze, with diameter of strand ‘01 in., gave the nearest approach to an early saturation, and was used in suheaaen experiments: Rutherford, in his paper already referred to, has shown that.gauzes exert a large influence in discharging ions from gas blown through them ; he finds that the effect depends, ap- parently, upon the ratio of the space occupied by the air between the meshes, and the extent of metal in the gauze. As,.-however, his experiments were performed with a field acting upon one side of the gauze, it seemed necessary to repeat the experiments with no field acting on the gauze, as from the experiments described above it would seem that under this condition the discharging power of the gauze should be even greater than as determined by Rutherford. The experiment was arranged so that gauzes could be set parallel to and ‘5 cm. below the bottom gauze of the chamber used in the previous experiments. A field of 300 volts per cm. was applied to the lower side of the electro- meter gauze and 100 volts per cm. above it, thus preventing ions from escaping through the electrometer gauze. Read- ings of the current were taken with and without the gauze which was to be tested, in position. The ratio of these two readings was taken as a measure of the discharging power of the gauze. In fig. 7 are plotted the results for parallel grids: cor- responding to Table B. There appears a certain value of 23 the ratio—air to metal surface—below which the discharg- ing power rises very rapidly. This effect is similar to that which would result from considering the gauze as a limiting s = ers ==ane = TABLE B. Discharging Powers of Gauzes. Oe Diam. of Distance Air. : is? Material. wien Wires, in between Wires, - oii hcl Pe oie aches, in inches. Metal. : Copper || 8 ‘016 "127 8-0 Nea | Copper || 16 ‘016 ‘050 32 13 Copper || ... 24 ‘016 027 Es 175 Copper ||... 32 ‘016 016 10 30 Copper || ... 40 ‘016 010 6 12°0 Copper || 16 ‘013 054 38 125 Copper || ... 32 018 020 14 2°12 races)... 11. °0185 ‘O72 1°0 1°35 prasix ..... lo *0155 *051 10 15 Iron x bette be ‘013 ‘058 13 15 Tron x aa i ‘010 ‘05 2°6 1:45 Iron x age lg ‘013 ‘046 118 18 Iron x gr aU 018 ‘032 1. 2°7 Brassx ... 20 ‘010 ‘04 12 1°65 Bras x... 25 ‘0095 ‘03 11 2°5 Iron x a GN "0245 "0245 6 3°85 Brassx. ... 40 ‘007 ‘018 11 0°45 Copper x ... 120 °0025 037 1:2 49-0 x Represents crossed mesh gauzes. || Represents parallel wire grids. 24 case of a set of parallel tubes of small diameter as used by Townsend in his experiment upon the diffusion of ions. Comparing these results with those of fig. 6, it is seen that, taking for comparison the brass gauze of 40 meshes per inch, each wire, ‘007 in. diameter, and the brass gauze of 20 meshes per inch, each wire ‘010 in. diameter; although their discharging powers are as 5°45 to 1°65, nevertheless with a field of 700 volts per cm., applied to their upper sur- faces, exactly the same number of ions are drawn through each. Again, twice the number of ions are drawn through the parallel wire gauze having 24 strands to the inch, as through the similar wire gauze having 40 strands per inch— when a field of about 1,060 volts to the cm. is appled in each case—although their discharging powers are respectively 1°75 and 12. § 2. Returning to the result shown in fig. 5. It has so far been assumed that the effects observed were due solely to the intensity and distribution of the field around the wires of the middle electrode. A question, however, suggests itself as to whether the whole, or only part, of the diminution in cur- rent which is observed when the fields on either side of the middle gauze are in the same direction is due to the with- drawal of ions from the lower chamber; for when the two fields are opposed in direction no ions cross the top chamber, while when the fields are in the same direction, some appa- rently do cross it. It seemed conceivable that there still might be something akin to partialiy combined sets of ions which, although un- affected by the weaker field of the lower chamber, produced ionization in the top chamber under the influence, not merely of an intense field, but as the result of ions moving in an intense field, through clusters such as have been already sug- gested. This would also explain the lack of saturation shown in the curves of fig. 6. An experiment was performed in an independent appa- ratus. Two ionization chambers, provided with aluminium windows, through which Rontgen rays could pass, were bal- anced electrically against each other. Through the one was drawn air which had been just previously subjected to the influence of either radium or uranium, the ionization having been subsequently removed by a weak field; through the other chamber a supply of air was drawn at the same speed. No alteration in the balance could be observed. Again, a ring of copper-wire was made active by exposure to thorium emanation, and placed on the upper surface of the 25 middle gauze. Readings were taken—/(a) With the copper ring active, and air which had previously passed over the uranium surface drawn through the chamber. (4) With the ring active, but the uranium removed, and still using the draught. (cj) With air passed over the uranium surface after the activity of the ring had disappeared. The results showed that the amount of ionization produced by the copper ring in air was the same as in the air which had just pre- viously passed under the influence of uranium. Again, had the want of saturation, shown in the curves of fig. 6, been due to the presence of clusters, or partially com- bined pairs of ions, an alteration of the shape of these curves might have been, expected if the number of ions was reduced withont altering the number of clusters. No alteration in the shape of the curves could, however, be detected when the uranium was moved some distance further from the gauze, or even when the ionization was still further reduced by plac- ing along the axis of the tube leading to the gauze a wire maintained at a few volts difference of potential from its surroundings. Recently a paper by M. de Broglie () has appeared, in which tests similar to those just described have been per- formed upon the gases coming from flames. His results are in agreement with the foregoing in so far that no clusters are found when water vapour is not present. Having found no support to the cluster theory, we must look to diffusion for an explanation of the curves in fig. 6. The distortion of the field in the imme- diate neighbourhotd of the wires of the middle gauze and its penetration through the wider gauzes have accounted for the results shown in fig. 5. The came cause, in gradually pre- venting diffusion of the ions to the lower side of the bottom gauze, will explain the difference in shape of the ionization curves obtained with broad- and with narrow-mesh gauzes, also the approach, in many cases, to the same final value of current, as the field strength is increased. One difficulty which arises in the foregoing explanation is that while the field exerts its influence through the air spaces of the bottom gauze, if the gauze be positively electri- fied, negative ions will, of course, be more readily drawn to the lower surfaces and sides of the wires of the gauze than if the gauze were uncharged; and positive ions should, appa- rently, be similarly repelled with a force which depends upon the strength of the field. Now, it is known “0 that when a ' (a) Le Radium, tome iv., No. 7, July, 1907. (10) J. J. Thomson, Elements of Electricity and Magnetism. 26 positively charged body of small, size is brought very close to a body of much larger dimensions similarly charged, the repulsion which normally exists reduces.in value to zero and changes to an attraction when the small charged body is brought within a certain critical: distance of the surface, this distance depending upon the charges on the small body and the surface, respectively, and on the curvature of the surfaces. This seems to offer the explanation of the marked difference which exists in the shapes of the ionization curves obtained with broad- and with narrow-mesh gauze, as the field strength is varied; for in the case considered positive ions are blown by. the current of air against the lower gauze surface, which is but weakly electrified “when the field in the chamber above is weax. As the field in the chamber is increased the fringe, which passes through the gauze, is strengthened, and the force which is exerted upon the positive ions by the draught is not sufficient to bring them to within the critical distance of the lower surface of the gauze to cause attraction. As the positive ions in air are larger and more massive than the negative, it is to be expected, when the lower gauze is nega- tive, that for a given field in the chamber above, less negative ions would be received by the electrometer gauze than in the corresponding case where the bottom gauze is positive. This, we have seen, does occur when the field is weak. Since, when a strong enough field is apphed, the same maximum value of current is obtained, whether the bottom gauze be positive or negative, and also for a large range of gauzes exposing very different amounts of surface, the most natural conclusion is that under such circumstances all the ions,of one sign which reach the lower surface of the gauze are drawn through the gauze without loss in number and are then collected by the central electrode. § 3. It has been shown by Bragg and Kleeman that the lack of saturation in a mixture of air and ethyl-chloride is con- siderably greater than for air. Their theory of initial re- combination explains this difference, and one of the objects in view at the commencement of the present experiment was to decide whether such an effect persisted for a time after the act of ionization by an a particle had been completed. As the results so far obtained show the difficulty there exists in eliminating the effects of diffusion when the ions are blown through gauzes, a comparative test between the behaviour of such a vapour as ethyl-chloride and air seemed as much as could at the time be safely derived. It was arranged to pass a mixture of ethyl-chloride with a small proportion of air from one gasometer through the 27 gauze chambers which have been described in fig. 4 to a second gasometer. A gauze was inserted, and enabled the draught to be carefully adjusted during each observation. Readings were taken with the lower gauze at potentials of 50 and 600 volts respectively. The depth of the chamber was 11 mm. The mean value of the ratio of the readings with the fields of 555 volts per cm. and 45 volts per cm. was found to be the same for the mixture of ethyl-chloride and air as it was for air only, its value being 1:05. Nitrous oxide was similarly tested, and gave a similar result. The velocity of the gas through the chamber was, in these experi- ments, about 5 cm. per second. The uranium was 5 cm. below the bottom gauze, so that approximately two seconds elapsed before the products of ionization from the centre of the uranium cylinder reached the gauze. Change in velocity of the draught was found to have no appreciable effect upon the result. The experiment indicates that air, ethyl-chloride, and nitrous oxide, although giving distinctly different ioniza- tion curves when the ionization.is measured in the presence and during the influence of the ionizing agent, show no difference in behaviour from each other when the ionization is collected from them after their removal for a period of two seconds or more from the influence of the ionizing agent. § 4. It: was now deemed advisable to make use of the second method of experiment, as mentioned in the introduction. The general arrangement of the experiment was such as to allow the a radiation from radium to act for some little time upon the gas to be experimented upon, this being en- closed in a suitable ionization-chamber, and both electrodes meanwhile being connected to earth. A lead screen was quickly interposed between the radium and the chamber ; the electrometer electrode was simultaneously disconnected from earth, and a strong field immediately applied between the electrodes. The field was left on for a time, sufficient to en- sure all the ions to reach the electrodes. It was then re- moved, and the charge, which had been collected on the in- sulated electrode, was measured by a quadrant electrometer. The radium bromide was held in a small metal cup placed at A (fig. 8) some little distance below the floor of the ioni- zation-chamber B. This chamber. consisted of a brass case connected to earth; in its floor was cut a circular opening of 1°2 cm. diameter. The hole was covered by a thin sheet of mica, F', which rendered the case gas-tight, but was thin enough to enable the a radiation to penetrate between the 28 Fl itt ~~ F ag 3: electrodes. For introducing gas to the chamber a metal plug was provided, which could be screwed into the opening be- low the mica, and while air was being exhausted from the chamber a small screw, operated from the outside, enabled a by-pass to be opened between the space on either side of the mica sheet. The lower electrode, (’, consisted of a brass gauze insulated from the case, attachment to it being made from the outside by an insulated wire. The upper electrode, D, consisted of a brass plate 8 cm. diameter, supported by a rod passing through sulphur insulation and being connected to one set of plates of a sliding condenser as in the experi- ments of Langevin.) An aluminium semaphore, G, enabled the a rays to be entirely shut off, when necessary, during the swing of the pen- dulum without reducing to any great extent the B and y radia- tion which entered the chamber. A plate of lead, //, about 2 mm. thick, attached to the pendulum, was arranged so as to swing between the radium and the opening in the ioni- zation-chamber. In this lead plate was cut a hole 1°5 cm. square, and the amplitude of swing was such that the a rays (1) Ann. de Chim. and Phys., 7me ser., tome 28-39, 1903. 29 could pass into the chamber only for a short period during the motion of the pendulum. The pendulum at the same time operated a contact A, by means of the pin L,, and this operation connected the electrode, (’, to a high potential de- rived from the small accumulator cells, 7, joined in series with a high resistance, #. Prior to the movement of the pendulum these cells were connected to earth through the key, K,. 3 ot 3 & 200 oO S o ap u o £ =) o (2) 1 Atomic Weight of Screen—> Fig. 3. 44 was rather too thin. In fig. 3 are drawn several curves, each showing the result of using some particular plug. In order to avoid confusion the representative points are not marked. The effect under discussion is clearly seen on comparing, for example, the curve for 161 cm. of Pb with that for. 3 cm. of Zn. Kleeman was the first to show that the distinction made by the y rays between different atoms in regard to the amount of secondary radiation produced by them could be modified by screening (Phil. Mag., Nov., 1907). Our results agree with his to this extent, but they do not show any true selective absorption, such as he supposes. . We may add that when using a different specimen of radium, with which we were able to allow the y rays to act with a minimum of previous screening, the emergence radia- _ tion of Pb was greater than that of C. It would appear pro- bable that with very soft rays other atoms lighter than Pb would surpass C in the same way, and that it is quite con- ceivable that the emergence radiations should increase with the atomic weight throughout the whole range. Ina letter to “Nature” (April 2, 1908, p. 509) Cooksey shows that in the case of X-rays the emergence radiations are greater than the incident, thus proving the parallel.to our own results in the case of y rays. He also finds that the emergence radiation increases with the atomic weight. This is the opposite to what we have found true of the y rays in most cases; but it is clear that it can be quite in accord with our theory. When the screen through which the y rays pass on their way into the chamber is gradually increased in thickness, the emergence radiation rises rapidly to a maximum, and then slowly decreases. The rise is due to increasing B radiation from the thickening screen ; the decrease to the absorption of the y rays by the screen. There is a maximum when the two effects balance. This was clearly shown by Wigger (Joc. cif., p. 429). If we determine the thickness which gives half the maximum value, we obtain an easy and fairly accurate mea- sure of the penetration of the secondary B rays. It is easily shown that this particular thickness is also that which would absorb half the equally penetrating radiation from a radio- active layer, assuming an exponential law, which it is per- missible to do with sufficient accuracy. The results are shown graphically in figs. 4 to 8. In each case the curve A represents the result of an experiment in which the lead plug, 1°61 cm. in thickness, was used to screen the y rays. The curve B shows the result with the plug removed. From each curve can be determined the thickness of screen, which gives half the full value of the emergence radiation ; the points are marked on the diagrams. The re- Smergence fadiation—* 500 £ a A See ol Se Se le ai ‘a , J cae i ee 400 Emergence Radiation—> & a ° a) r= ° o *lma. "2am. “oman 4mm. oma. *Ges. *7an. “Sun. nn. Thickness of Screen—> $00) wt o “ °o 18 Foils +029 mm.) +0 a) Co So iy °o 2 Pe e eee Emergence Radiation —~> eT all 100) a —— ral ‘lnm 2mm. -Snm “40m -Sam *onm *7an. Soa. eOmm. rOmm. fhickness of Screen— 46 + < 300 to) a 3 co] a i 200 2 to 3) co) & = t & of | Eo leas at a 100 a farsi cee ie} lmn. 40m. Thicknes of Screen > 600 509, ee ° = nod a ee f= 3 © ° < ° 9 Emer nw : 1m 2m Thickness an Screen —> Fig. oe. sults for the hard rays are collected and shown in the second column of the following table: — I. tI. LT, IV; Substance. Thickness of Screen A Calculated A for B rays. to give half-value from IL., in (McClelland and in mm. cm! Hackett). Lead saree “O83 ra 84 sie 93 Tin eee, 5 Ae. ve 50 me 52 Copper ey mre eh Phe 51 ae 55 Aluminium 2. “50 ay 14 At 14 Celluloid a 98 hye — bat — 47 The third column shows the values of A calculated from the results in the second column. The fourth column shows the values of A for the primary 8 rays of radium, as given by McClelland and Hackett. (Trans. Roy. Soc. Dub., March 22, 1907, p. 49.) A comparison of the two last columns shows clearly that the secondary 8 rays excited by the y rays possess nearly the same velocity, no matter in what substance they are excited, and that this velocity is the same as that of the primary 8 rays. Only hard y rays have been used to excite the B rays in these experiments, while the values of McClel- land and Hackett refer to 8 rays of ordinary heterogeneity. It is scarcely possible in the present state of knowledge to estimate what allowance should be made for this difference, but it is clear that the main conclusion cannot be affected by it. The value of A varies rapidly with the speed of the B par- ticle, and there is room for considerable alteration of the values in the table without any important alteration in the associated speed. Nor does much error arise from neglect of the correction discussed above, which makes the emergence radiations too small. The various curves of figs. 4 to 8 should really run a little way past the point taken as origin of co- ordinates. If we consider the corresponding values for the soft rays, or rather, soft together with hard rays, we find, as expected, that the 8 rays which they produce are of a much less pene- trating character. Also, the difference between the curves A and B is most marked in the case of lead and tin, a re- sult which is in agreement with what has gone before. For these metals the thicknesses of screen required to give half the full emergence radiation are ‘030 mm. and ‘048 mm. re- spectively, which may be compared with the values 083 and "141 obtained when hard rays were used. The amount of soft radiation is so large that we may consider the effect of the hard radiation mixed with it as a correction to be allowed for. The effect of the hard radiation which has been passed through the plug, 1°61 cm. of lead, is, of course, shown by the curve A. It is a little difficult to say precisely what it would have been if the rays had not gone through the plug, since the absorption co-efficient for y rays varies so much with the hardness. From ‘8 cm. Pb to 1°25 cm. Pb, the value of A is given by McClelland as 44 cm.—'; from 2°8 cm. Pb onwards Wigger gives ‘241 cm.—'. We have taken a value between these, towards the harder side, and drawn the curve 4’ for each metal, derived from A by increasing the ordinates of 4 by two-thirds, a factor calculated from the absorption co- efficient chosen. Subtracting A’ from B, we obtain B’, a curve which may be taken as representing approximately the beha- 48 viour of soft y rays alone. The form of the curve for both Pb and Sn seems to suggest that the operation has been a success. The half-values are now °024 and ‘029 respectively. Thus the B rays due to these soft y rays have only one-quarter the penetration of those derived from the harder y rays. Pos- sibly we have here an association with the facts stated by H. W. Schmidt (Ann. der Phys., Bd. 21, p. 654), viz., that the B rays emitted by RaC consist of two groups, of which one has four times the penetration of the other. The thickness of Al screen necessary to reduce the harder set to half-value was °53, which agrees with the 50 given in the table above ; for the softer rays the value was ‘131, nearly a quarter of the other. If there are two main groups of 8 rays we should cer- tainly expect to find two corresponding groups of y rays. Kleeman has also argued in the same direction, though for different reasons. As will be seen from figs. 6 to 8 we have made the same attempt to sort the ‘soft from the hard rays in respect to Cu, Al, and celluloid as in the case of Pb and Sn. The propor- tion of soft y rays converted into B rays is now much less relatively. The results for soft rays are therefore of less accuracy, and depend appreciably on the allowance made for the hard rays. Nevertheless, they are of considerable interest. They show clearly the difference between the effects of hard and soft rays, and the varying proportion of soft to hard from substance to substance. It may be gathered from consideration of all these curves that. secondary y rays play a very small part in ionizing the air within the chamber. If there were any appreciable amount of it we should expect a gradual rise long after the effect of the secondary 8 rays had reached its maximum value. StL. We may now give a short summary of the results of this and our previous paper : — (1) When y radiation is diminished in quantity in con- sequence of its passage through matter, 6 radiation appears in its place, moving at the outset in the ori- ginal direction of the y radiation, and subsequently undergoing scattering in the ordinary manner of B rays. (2) The speed and penetration of the 8 radiation thus produced increase with the penetration of the y radiation to which it is due. (3) The speed of the B radiation does not depend on the nature or condition of the atom in which it arises. (4) In the case of radium the speed of the 8 radiation 49 produced is nearly equal to the speed of the B rays emitted by radium itself. In the case of uranium, thorium, and actinium there are indications that the law holds good also, but no exact measurements have yet been made. (5) When very hard y rays traverse matter the absorp- tion and the consequent production of 8 rays are almost independent of the atomic structure of the matter, and a density law follows. Softer rays are affected by atomic structure, in that the heavier atoms are more absorbent than the lighter, weight for weight ; and the softer the rays are the more pro- minent this effect becomes. (6) If there are secondary y rays, the ionization which they produce is negligible compared with that pro- duced by the secondary 8 radiation, at least within a moderate distance (say 100 cm. of air) of the radiator. § III. Various hypotheses have been suggested as to the mode in which the secondary § radiation is produced by the interac- tion of the y (or X-) ray and the atom. It is convenient to divide them into three classes, and to consider to what extent each class is able to furnish an explanation of the properties set out in the summary just given. To the first class belong those hypotheses which suppose both the energy and the material of the 8 radiation to be furnished by the atom alone; the y ray is a pulse which merely pulls the trigger. In its most recent form this idea is put for- ward by W. Wien (Gottingen Nachrichten, 1907, p. 598). Secondly, it may be supposed that the energy of the B radiation comes from the y ray, but the material from the atom. The y ray is a bundle of electric energy, possessing mass, which impinges on the atom and drives out the elec- tron before it. This is the view now held by J. J. Thomson (Camb. Phil. Soc. Proc., vol. xiv., pt. iv., p. 417). Thirdly, both the energy and the material of the 8 ray may be supposed to be derived from the y ray. The latter is not a pulse but a neutral pair, positive and negative ; in pass- - ing through some atom the bonds are dissolved, and the nega- tive flies on. (Trans. Roy. Soc. of 8.A., May, 1907; Phil. Mag., Oct., 1907.) Consider first the theory which considers that the whole of the energy of the expelled electron comes from the internal energy of the atom. It is to be supposed that the pulse as it widens finds an atom here and there which is in an explosive 50 condition, and that in some unknown way it precipitates a catastrophe. There is, of course, one point which is imme- diately cleared up by such a hypothesis, viz., that the speed of the expelled electron is independent of the intensity or quantity of the primary radiation. But here we stop short, for we have also to explain why the speed of the electron is not independent of the quality of the primary radiation. Why should the speed be great when the primary ‘y rays are hard, and small when they are soft? Why should the velo- city of the shot depend on the way in which the trigger is pulled? We might get out of the difficulty by supposing an atom to be like a battery which contained a number of diffe- rent kinds of guns, and that the pulses were selective, each pulling the trigger of its own particular gun. But even if we have presumed some highly artificial arrangement of this kind, we have greater difficulties still to face. How is it that the pulses always find the guns pointing in the direction in which they are travelling themselves, so that the motion of the shot is a continuation of their own line of flight? For if the speed of the electron is independent of the strength of the pulse, then, so to speak, the touch on the trigger must be very light indeed, and can have nothing to do with the laying of the gun. We might perhaps suppose that there were guns in the battery pointing in all directions, and that the pulse only fired the one which pointed in that direction in which it was travel- ling itself; but this would require a special atomic structure to meet the case, and it would be out of all proportion to frame such a hypothesis to explain the observed effect. Nor do our difficulties end here. For if the expulsion of the elec- tron is the result of an atomic disintegration, should we not expect the velocity of the electron to vary from atom to atom, as it does in the case of the radio-active substances? It is in- conceivable that the explosion of a light atom should result in the expulsion of an electron with exactly the same speed as in the case of the heavy atom. And, further, assuming the same hypothesis, how can the production of 6 rays, in the case of the hard y rays, be absolutely independent of atomic structure in all respects whatever ? Thus, after its first small success, the theory breaks down at every point. It is true that Wien makes a tentative appli- cation of a theory of Planck, viz., that energy emitted from atoms is divided into definite units, the size of which is in- versely proportional to the associate wave length. He thence deduces the law v?A=constant, where v is the velocity of the ejected electron, and A the thickness of the X-ray pulse which he is considering. He thus passes by the need of explaining certain of the difficulties just discussed, and arrives at a for- 51 mula from which the second and third properties in the above summary may be derived. Even then his theory fails to ex- plain the first and fourth properties. It seems to us to be clear that the application of Planck’s theory is not justified. And, generally, we conclude that the energy of the secondary B ray does not come from the atom. We now come to the second case. In this there is no sug- gestion of trigger action ; the energy of the B radiation is sup- posed to be entirely derived from that of the ether pulses. As already mentioned, this theory has lately been maintained by J. J. Thomson (Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., vol. xiv., pt. iv., p. 417). It is also discussed by N. R. Campbell (“Modern Elec- trical Theory’). Since an ether pulse of the orthodox form spreads its energy over wider and wider surfaces as it radiates from its origin, and since the energy of the ejected secondary particle is immensely greater than can be imparted to it during the passage of the weak, and always weakening, pulse, it becomes a necessity on this hypothesis to concentrate the energy of the pulse along radial lines, having their centre at the place where the primary cathode particle is suddenly stopped or accelerated. Thomson speaks of “bundles of energy” occupying only a very small portion of the wave- front, the rest of the front being blank. Of course this at once suggests explanations of some of the difficulties of the y and X-rays, such as the ionization of only a few of the atoms swept over by the wave, and the absence of relation be- tween the velocity of the secondary electron, on the one hand, and, on the other, the intensity of the radiation and the nature of the atom. Also, it makes provision for a concentration of momentum. This theory, however, postulates a very special and complicated structure of the ether. And, in the second place, it does not even then offer an explanation of all the phenomena. If a “bundle of energy” provides the energy with which the secondary cathode particle leaves the atom, then the energy-content of the bundle must be greater than the energy of the particle. If, on the other hand, as in the case of the X. rays, the energy of the bundle is derived from that of the arrested cathode particle, the former must be less than the latter. Now, it seems quite clear that the energy of the secondary electron is at least nearly as great as that of the primary cathode particle. For in the case of the X-rays the velocity of the secondary electron is nearly 10?°, and is there- fore much the same as that of the cathode rays in the bulb. And we have shown above, in the analogous case of y rays, that the velocity of the.secondary B ray, produced by the y ray, is practically the same as that of the primary 8 ray, which is- sues with the y ray. We must, therefore, conclude on this 52 hypothesis that the energies of the primary electron, the bundle, and the secondary electron are all equal. The whole of the energy of the cathode particle in the X-ray tube is converted into one energy bundle. This darts away from the anticathode, and sooner or later causes the ejection of an electron from some atom which it traverses, handing over to the electron the whole of its own store of energy. Replace the bundle of energy by a neutral pair, and the whole affair seems simple enough. But surely the complications of the ether structure increase the more closely we examine the pro- cess under which rapidly moving electrons in the X-ray tube disappear, and similar electrons, moving at the same rate, ap- pear elsewhere, if we are to consider that the only links be- tween them are little bundles of energy moving with the speed of light. . It might be said, perhaps, that one bundle contains the energy of several arrested electrons; but in that case we should have bundles of all sizes and secondary electrons of all speeds: or that several bundles might pile up their ener- gies in one atom until there was enough for the ejection of one secondary electron ; but then we should return to the dif- ficulty of explaining why the speed is independent of the na- ture of the atom. A cathode particle cannot give all its energy to a pulse unless its arrest is brought about in a very sudden and spe- cial way. The thickness of the pulse must not be greater than the diameter of the electron or corpuscle (Cond. of Elect.,” p. 660). If the pulse is thicker than this, only a pro- portional fraction of the energy of the cathode particle can be converted into the energy of the pulse. Now it is gene- rally believed that the phenomena of the X-rays require a pulse many thousands of times as thick as the diameter of an electron. It does not seem possible to reconcile these op- posite requirements. The bundle must be excessively small. If it is larger than an atom, or even than an electron, the whole of its energy cannot be given up to one electron on which it im- pinges. There would not be time for the energy to move in from the outskirts of the bundle to the place where it is being transformed into the motion of the electron. It must not expand or contract its borders as it moves, or else its effect will vary as it travels. The difficulties of this theory are exactly those which would naturally arise in the attempt to transfer the proper- ties of a material particle to an immaterial disturbance. Let us now consider the third form of hypothesis, ac- cording to which both the energy and the material of the 53 secondary electron are derived from the primary ray. In our previous paper on this subject, and in papers on “The Properties and Natures of Various Electric Radiations’ (Trans. Roy. Soc. of 8.A., May and June, 1907; Phil. Mag., Oct., 1907), it was shown that the hypothesis offered a rea- sonable explanation of all the phenomena known to date. It is only necessary now to show to what extent it fits with the properties of the y rays enumerated in § II. of this paper. We will take the properties in turn. As regards (1) we have simply to suppose that the nega- tive and positive, passing united into an atom, are separat- ed if they happen to traverse a very strong field anywhere therein; the negative flies on and the positive becomes in- effective. The second property is also an obvious consequence of the hypothesis. The faster the y particle is moving the greater the initial speed of the negative. The third is readily explainable: the electric field of the atom merely dissolves the bonds that connect the pair. It is not able to affect the speed of the negative set free. The fourth may be taken to imply that the radio-active atom (say RaC) ejects electrons at certain speeds, some of which start off in company with a positive counterpart, some without. The former constitute the y rays, the latter the B rays. When the y rays break up, the negatives so produced have the same speed as the primary 8 rays. The fifth would show that there are stronger fields in- side heavy atoms than light ones, and that the chance of separation of a pair increases with (a) the strength of the field, (6) the time taken to cross it. This is all the explanation that is necessary. We can at least claim that it is much simpler and more complete than any explanation which the ether-pulse theory seems likely to afford, even in its latest form. It is true that the neutral - pair hypothesis requires the existence of a positive counterpart to the negative electron. In a previous paper it was suggested that this might be an a particle; the results of this paper seem rather to suggest that its mass is only small, and that it may really be a posi- tive electron. Now the positive electron has hitherto been re- ceived with little favour; but the argument has been not so much against its existence as against its presence in metals in a free state. The latter is not at all necessary to our hypo- thesis. We require only that the positive shall exist, that it can be torn from its attachment and carried away by a passing negative electron, and, again, that it can be left behind in some atom which the pair subsequently traverses. 54 The recent determination by Cooksey of the want of symmetry between the emergence and incidence radiations due to X-rays is the last experiment required to show that all the properties in the summary of § II. are true for X-rays as well as for y rays, mutatis mutandis. All the properties except the first have been already shown to be true (see our first paper on this subject). ~The complete parallelism be- tween X- and y rays stands out more strongly than ever. In conclusion, there is one aspect of the problem which seems to invite a little further consideration. The charac- teristics of the secondary 8 ray are independent, as we have seen, of the nature of the atom in which it arises, and de- pend only on the nature of the y ray to which it is due. This is all the more remarkable when we consider that the characteristics of primary B rays are peculiarly dependent on the nature of the atoms whence they emerge, and are ab- solutely independent of physical agencies acting from with- out. In the one case, that of secondary 8 radiation, we can determine that a given material shall emit 6 rays of definite speed and direction, and can carry out our determination by the use of suitable agencies and dispositions. In the other case, that of primary 6B radiation, the whole process is com- pletely beyond our control. It is one example of this con- trast that the radio-active substances do not emit secondary radiations to an abnormal extent. It is clear that there is a sharp line of distinction between the emission of an elec- tron from an atom as a primary § ray, and the emergence of an electron from an atom as a secondary B ray. On our hypothesis the origin of the distinction is simply that in the former case the electron was part of the atom which ejected it; in the latter case, it was no part of the atom: it came in with the exciting ray. All the experimental evidence ac- cords with this view. We come very close to the complete realization of an anticipation made twelve months ago (Trans. Roy. Soc. of S.A., May 7, 1907, pp. 84, 85), “All secondary radiation, other than the 6 rays, seems to be in general a rough reflection or scattering of the primary . . . The only cases in which a secondary radiation appears, that is neither 5 radiation nor reflected primary rays, are those in which B rays are produced at the impact of X- or y rays, and in which X-rays are produced by cathode rays. » ott may well be that further research will bring these cases into better agreement with the rest.” On the neutral-pair hypo- thesis the exceptions mentioned here practically disappear. There remains a broad generalization, which, with all the faults natural to its kind, seems to us to be applicable to every case of which we have knowledge, and to be an import- ant principle of the theory of secondary radiation. 55 NEW AUSTRALIAN LEPIDOPTERA OF THE FAMILIES NOCTUIDZ AND PYRALIDEA. By A. JEFFERIS Turner, M.D., F.ES., Brisbane. [Read April 7, 1908.] Family NOCTUID. Subfamily AGARISTIN A. ARGYROLEPIDIA ZTHRIAS, Nl. sp. (dthria, the sky.) 3, 39 mm. Head blackish, a pair of spots on crown and sides of face yellowish-white. Palpi yellowish-white, terminal joint, and a spot on external surface of second joint before apex, blackish. Antenne blackish. Thorax blackish with some whitish scales ; posterior edge and two longitudinal lines on patagia yellowish-white. Abdomen grey; tuft, ex- cept on dorsum, and under-surface orange. Legs blackish, irrorated, and tarsi annulated with white; anterior coxe yel- lowish-white ; middle tibiz orange on external surface. Fore- wings triangular, costa moderately arched, apex rounded, ter- men bowed, slightly cblique; blackish; basal area strigu- lated and spotted with greenish-white; a squarish greenish- white spot on dorsum before middle; succeeded by a small spot, constricted in middle, beyond mid-dorsum; a small bluish-white spot in cell; an outwardly-oblique yellowish- white spot from costa beyond middle, constricted beneath costa; beyond and beneath this a larger spot of the same colour, divided posteriorly into three obtuse teeth; a sub- terminal series of pale-blue spots; cilia blackish, on apex and tornus white. Hindwings with termen rounded, irregularly dentate ; blackish ; a large triangular basal area pale metallic blue; cilia white. This attractive species is nearest A. nove-hiberme, Bdv. Type in Coll. Turner. N.Q., Cape York; one specimen. Section AGROTIN A. PROTEUXOA LOXOSEMA, D. sp. (Loxosemos, obliquely marked.) 3 Q, 35-40 mm. Head, palpi, and thorax dark-reddish- brown. Antenne fuscous, towards bases whitish; in ¢ minutely ciliated (+) with slightly longer bristles. Abdomen pale fuscous. Legs grey, mixed with whitish and brownish. 56 Forewings elongate-oblong, costa nearly straight, apex rounded, termen rounded beneath; dark-reddish-brown ; veins obscurely marked by fuscous and pale-grey irroration ; orbicular represented by a minute white dot, reniform by an outwardly oblique, rather irregularly shaped, white bar; a dark oblique subterminal shade, sometimes outlined with whitish, nearly straight, but with small subcostal tooth ;. beyond this ground colour is paler; cilia dark-grey, mixed with pale-grey. Hindwings with termen rounded, slightly wavy ; pale-fuscous; cilia whitish, with a fuscous median line. Type in Coll. Drake. V., Leopold, Gisborne, Beaconsfield, in March and April ;. four specimens received from Dr. Drake and Mr. G. Lyell. PROTEUXOA SPODIAS, 0. sp. (Spodos, ashes.) 3, 34 mm. Head, palpi, and thorax whitish-grey. An- tenne pale-grey; in ¢ minutely ciliated (4), with slightly longer bristles. Abdomen pale-grey. Legs whitish. . Fore- wings elongate, costa straight, except close to base and apex, apex rounded, termen rounded beneath ; whitish-grey ; orbicu- lar and reniform faintly indicated in darker grey; a barely perceptible line of grey dots parallel to termen, midway be- tween that and reniform; cilia pale-grey. Hindwings with termen rounded, somewhat wavy; pale-grey; cilia whitish, with a grey median line at apex. Type in Coll. Drake. V., Black Rock, near Melbourne, in March; one specimen: received from Dr. Drake. Section HADENINA. CIRPHIS ORTHOMITA, N. sp. (Orthomitos, with straight threads.) 3d 2,38 mm. Head, palpi, and thorax whitish-ochreous.. Antenne pale-fuscous, towards base whitish-ochreous; in 6 serrate with moderate cilia (1) arranged in fascicles. Abdo- men with dense lateral tufts; whitish-ochreous. Legs whitish- ochreous; three terminal tarsal joints dark-fuscous. Fore- wings elongate, costa slightly arched, apex rounded, termen rounded beneath; whitish-ochreous; a slender blackish line from base along fold to 4; a shorter, similar line immediately above submedian in posterior part of cell, extending slightly beyond cell; a terminal series of blackish dots between veins ; cilia whitish-ochreous, apices barred with dark-fuscous. Hind- wings with termen rounded, sinuate; grey ; some fuscous ter- minal dots; cilia ochreous-whitish. 57 Type in Coll. Lyell. V., Leopold, in April; two specimens received from Mr. G Lyell. | Section CUCULLIANZ. EUMICHTIS MESOPHHA. (Mesophaios, dusky in the middle.) Eumichtis mesophea, Hmps., Cat. Lep. Phal. VI., p. 348. 3, 32-34 mm. Head and palpi brown-fuscous. Anten- nz fuscous; in ¢ simple with short ciliations (4). Thorax with a bifid posterior crest; brown-fuscous, an inwardly oblique whitish streak on each patagium. Abdomen with two or three dorsal crests and dense lateral tufts; fuscous. Legs brown-fuscous, tarsi annulated with whitish. Forewings not elongate, costa scarcely arched, apex rounded, termen crenu- late, rounded beneath ; brown-fuscous ; markings dark-fuscous ; seven short costal strigule between base and #; three minute whitish costal dots on apical 4+; a triangular spot above + dorsum ; an irregular discal blotch narrower towards dorsum, much expanded towards costa, including orbicular and reni- form as transversely elongate, medially constricted, pale areas ; posterior edge of reniform outlined with ferruginous; a dentate subterminal line mixed with ferruginous; a fine interrupted terminal line; cilia fuscous, base pale ferruginous. Hindwings with termen rounded, obtusely dentate; fuscous ; cilia ochreous-whitish with a fuscous median line not reaching tornus. | re Type in Coll. Drake. V., Beaconsfield, in January ; two specimens. Section ACRONYCTIN 4. PROMETOPUS POLIOPHRACTA, Nl. Sp. (Poliophraktos, grey-bordered.) 3, 32-34 mm. Head grey: upper half of face dark-fus- cous. Palpi whitish; basal 3 of external surface dark-fus- cous. Antenne fuscous, towards base whitish; in <¢_ serrate and shortly ciliated (4) in tufts. Thorax whitish-grey ; bases of tegule fuscous. Abdomen pale-grey. Legs whitish, irro- rated with dark-fuscous; tarsi fuscous, with whitish annula- tions. Forewings elongate, costa slightly arched near ex- tremities, apex rounded, termen rounded beneath; whitish- grey, with scattered fuscous scales: lines dark-fuscous; an incomplete line near base; a strongly dentate line, varitly double, from } costa to 4 dorsum; some brownish suffusion basal to this line: a circular brownish dot edged with dark- fuscous representing orbicular; reniform represented by a 58 short transverse brownish streak, to the posterior edge of which is closely applied a crescentic whitish streak, edged pos- teriorly with dark-fuscous; a fine dentate posterior trans- verse line; some dark-fuscous suffusion in mid-disc and again beyond posterior line, the latter containing some blackish streaks and brownish scales, and forming a sharp wavy sub- terminal edge ; terminal area whitish-grey ; a fine fuscous ter- minal line; cilia grey, with a fine basal brownish line. Hind- wings with termen rounded, slightly sinuate ; grey ; cilia white with a grey antemedian line, on apex and dorsum grey. Type in Coll. Drake. V., Black Rock, near Melbourne, in March; two speci- mens. CARADRINA CRYPHA, N. Sp. (Kruphaios, hidden.) 3 9, 32-36 mm. Head and thorax fuscous or brownish- fuscous. Palpi dark-fuscous, apex of second joint more or less whitish. Antennzpale-fuscous; in ¢ serrate and shortly ciliated (4). Abdomen grey; sometimes mixed with whitish- ochreous. Legs fuscous, tarsi annulated with whitish; pos- terior, femora, and tibie clothed with long whitish hairs. Forewings elongate, costa scarcely arched, apex rounded, ter- men rounded beneath ; whitish-grey, with some brownish suf- fusion, especially towards termen, or grey mixed with ochre- ous-whitish ; basal line obsolete, represented by two fuscous dots on costa; a fine dentate transverse line at 4, sometimes double; orbicular obsolete, sometimes a transverse fuscous median shade, from mid-costa obliquely outwards, then bent inwards and again bent to dorsum beyond middle; reniform faintly indicated by a brownish or pale-ochreous suffused spot; a finely dentate postmedian line from 3 costa to % dor- sum, succeeded by some dark streaks on veins; a dark sub- terminal shade sharply defined posteriorly ; a terminal series of indistinct dark-fuscous dots, sometimes obsolete ; cilia con- colorous. Hindwings with termen rounded; whitish, to- wards termen suffused with fuscous; cilia fuscous at apex, becoming whitish towards tornus. Type in Coll. Lyell. V., Gisborne, Castlemaine, and Murtoa, in March and April; a series received from Mr. G. Lyell. CaRADRINA LEUCOSTICTA, Nl. Sp. (Leucostiktos, white-spotted.) Q, 26-28 mm. Head and thorax brown; lower edge of face ochreous-whitish. Palpi dark-fuscous; terminal joint 59 and apex of second joint ochreous-whitish, with a few fus- cous scales. Antenne fuscous. Abdomen brown-whitish, ir- rorated with brown. Legs fuscous, irrorated, and tarsi annu- lated, with ochreous-whitish; posterior pair paler. Fore- wings elongate-oblong, costa straight, apex rounded, termen rounded beneath; brown with a few scattered whitish and dark-fuscous scales; a fine transverse, rather wavy dark-fus- cous line at 4; a white spot at 3, representing reniform, some- times preceded by a similar spot representing orbicular ; imme- diately succeeded by an interrupted dark-fuscous transverse line ; a terminal series of white dots; cilia brown mixed with fuscous. Hindwings with termen rounded ; ochreous-whitish ; cilia ochreous-whitish. Type in Coll. Drake. V., Black Rock, near Melbourne; three specimens. CARADRINA MELANOGRAPHA, 0D. sp. (Melanographos, inscribed with black.) 3, 27-29 mm. Head and thorax whitish-ochreous, irro- rated with fuscous. Palpi dark-fuscous; apex of second joint whitish ; terminal joint whitish, with a few dark-fuscous scales. Antenne dark-fuscous; An d shortly ciliated (4). Abdomen ochreous-whitish, irrorated with pale fuscous. Legs dark-fuscous, tibie and tarsi annulated with ochreous-whit- ish ; posterior pair mostly ochreous-whitish. Forewings elong- ate-oblong, costa straight, slightly arched near _ base and apex, apex rounded, termen rounded beneath; ochreous- whitish, irrorated with brownish-fuscous ; a blackish line from eosta near base, not reaching dorsum; a white, black-edged dot in disc at 4; a dentate transverse blackish line at $; a second white black-edged dot at 4; five or six fuscous dots on apical half of costa; a fine blackish dentate line from 3 costa, bent outwards in disc, to 2 dorsum; a dark subterminal shade, twice dentate; a terminal series of black dots; cilia pale-fuscous. Hindwings with termen rounded ; whitish, with fuscous suffusion; a crescentic fuscous mark at end of cell; a fine fuscous terminal line; cilia whitish. Ab. Fore- wings suffused with dark-fuscous, white discal dots sometimes obsolete, subterminal shade edged by an ochreous-whitish line. Type in Coll. Drake. _V., Black Rock, near Melbourne; four specimens, includ- ing two of the dark form. CARADRINA AMATHODES, Nn. Sp. (Amathodes, sandy.) 3 9, 34 mm. Head and thorax pale-ochreous. Palpi dark-fuscous, terminal joint and apical third of second joint 60 ochreous-whitish. Abdomen ochreous-whitish. Legs pale- ochreous; tarsi fuscous, with ochreous-whitish annulaticns. Forewings elongate, costa slightly arched near base, then straight, apex rounded, termen rounded beneath; pale-ochre- ous; a dark-fuscous dot on costa near base; another at 4, in a line with one at mid-disc, and another above dorsum at 4; a dot on costa beyond middle, from which proceeds a row of fine dots obliquely outwards, then curved downwards to #? dorsum ; orbicular obsolete, reniform represented by a faint crescentic fuscous streak ; a darker subterminal shade, sharply outlined posteriorly, with a subcostal tooth; a fine, inter- rupted fuscous terminal’ line; cilia pale-ochreous. Hindwings with termen rounded; whitish-ochreous; cilia’ whitish-ochre- ous. Type in Coll. Drake. V., Black Rock, near Melbourne, in Febrageee two speci- mens. . CARADRINA NYCTERIS, ND. sp. (Nukteris, a night-bird.) Q, 32 mm. Head, thorax, palpi, and antennz fuscous. Abdomen fuscous, irrorated with whitish. Legs fuscous, irro- rated, and tarsi annulated with whitish ; posterior pair mostly whitish. Forewings elongate-oblong, posteriorly dilated, costa scarcely arched, apex rounded, termen somewhat obliquely rounded ; fuscous, with some paler scales ; an indistinct dark- fuscous dentate line from + costa to 4 dorsum; orbicular in- dicated by a minute whitish dot; reniform obscure, pet fus- cous; a very indistinct outwardly-curved pale line at #; an irregular interrupted pale subterminal line preceded . a darker shade of fuscous; a terminal series of minute whitish dots; cilia fuscous. Hindwings with termen rounded, some- what sinuate beneath apex ; fuscous; cilia fuscous, Type in Coll. Turner. N.S.W., Emu Plains, near Sydney ; one specimen received from Mr. G. A. Waterhouse. CARADRINA BASISTICHA, N. Sp. (Basisteikos, with basal streak.) 3,28 mm. Head pale brownish-ochreous. Palpi dark- fuscous, apex and internal surface pale brownish-ochreous. Antenne fuscous; in dg serrate with short ciliations (4). Thorax pale brownish-ochreous mixed with fuscous. Abdo- men whitish-ochreous, irrorated with pale-fuscous. Legs fus- cous irrorated, and = tarsi annulated with whitish-ochreous ; posterior pair mostly whitish-ochreous. Forewings elongate- oblong, costa straight except near base and apex, apex 61 rounded, termen rounded, scarcely oblique; brownish irro- rated with fuscous; a fine dark-fuscous streak from base along fold to 4; orbicular and reniform indicated by pale spots with darker outlines; indications of dark-fuscous streaks along veins toward termen, ending in terminal dots; cilia brownish- fuscous. Hindwings with termen rounded, somewhat wavy beneath apex ; whitish, towards apex and termen suffused with fuscous; cilia whitish with a fuscous line near bases. The type is not in the best condition; it is somewhat similar to C. acallis, Turn., but a browner insect, and readily distinguishable by the basal streak on forewings. Type in Coll. Turner. Q., Brisbane, in October; one specimen. . Genus ELEsMaA. Elesma, Wlk., Brit. Mus. Cat. xxxii., p. 608. Amaloptila, Turn., Tr.R.S.S.A., 1903, p. 6. This genus appears to have real affinity with the Voline. ELESMA SUBGLAUCA. Elesma subglauca, Wlk., Brit. Mus. Cat. xxxii., p. 608. Amaloptila triorbis, Turn., Tr.R.S.S.A., 1903, p. 6. N.S.W., Newcastle. V., Beaconsfield. Genus EPpicyRrTIca, nov. (LE pikurtikos, hump-backed.) Frons with a rounded, horny projection, covered with scales. Tongue very small. Palpi slender, porrect, hairy, not reaching beyond frontal projection. Antenne in gd simple, minutely ciliated. Thorax with a dense rounded posterior crest. Abdomen smooth. Forewings with 2 from {, 3 from angle, 2, 3, and 4 well separated at bases, 6 from upper angle of cell, 7, 8, 9 stalked, 10 connected by a bar with 7, 8, 9. Hindwings with 3 and 4 stalked, 5 imperfectly de- veloped from middle of discocellulars, 6 and 7 stalked, 8 ana- stomizing with 7 near base. | The affinities of this genus are uncertain. EPICYRTICA LATHRIDIA, N. sp. (Lathridios, stealthy, secret.) 36, 22 mm. Head, palpi, thorax, and abdomen grey mixed with fuscous and whitish. Antenne grey-whitish; in 6 with short ciliations ($3). Legs fuscous irrorated, and tarsi annulated, with whitish; posterior pair mostly whitish. Forewings elongate-triangular, costa gently arched, apex : rounded, termen obliquely rounded; grey; markings dark- _ fuscous; a distinct line near base, angled beneath costa; a fine line from § costa to 4 dorsum, irregularly dentate; an 62 incomplete circle in disc before middle; an irregularly den- tate line from mid-costa to 4 dorsum; three roughly parallel lines from terminal third of costa, converging towards tor- nus; an interrupted terminal line; cilia grey, apices whitish. Hindwings with termen somewhat sinuate ; whitish irrorated with grey; indistinct grey median and postmedian lines; a dark-grey terminal line, obsolete towards tornus ; cilia whitish. Type in Coll. Lyell. V., Leopold, near Melbourne, in: April; one specimen. Section ACONTIAN Z. Genus ACACHMENA, nov. (Akachmenos, sharp; in allusion to the thoracic crest.) Frons flat. Tongue well developed. Palpi ascending; second joint with a strong triangular anterior tuft; terminal joint short, obtuse. Antenne in ¢ (unknown). Thorax with a sharp, elongate keel-like posterior crest. Abdomen with dorsal crests on first two segments. Forewings with 7, 8, 9 stalked, 10 connected by a bar with 8+9 beyond 7. Hind- wings with 3 and 4 separate, 5 from mid-way between 4 and middle of cell, 6 and 7 separate. ACACHMENA CENOCROSSA, Nl. sp. (Oinokrossos, with vinous border.) 2, 20 mm. Head, palpi, and thorax whitish-red with some reddish-purple irroration. Antenne fuscous, towards base whitish-red. Abdomen whitish ; crests whitish-red. Legs whitish ; anterior pair reddish. Forewings triangular, costa straight, slightly arched towards base and apex, apex pointed, termen nearly straight, oblique; whitish-red with sparsely- scattered fuscous-purple scales; two very fine’ purplish lines, one median, the second at #; a reddish dot on costa at origin of second line; cilia reddish-purple, apices whitish. Hind- wings with termen rounded; whitish, towards termen suf- fused with pale-fuscous; cilia whitish. Type in Coll. Turner. N.Q., Kuranda, in March; one specimen received from Mr. VP. Dodds Genus ALYPOPHANES, nov. (Alypophanes, of cheerful appearance. ) Frons rounded, somewhat protuberant. Tongue well de- veloped. Palpi moderate, slender, smooth-scaled, ascending, not reaching vertex; second joint moderate; terminal joint short, tolerably acute. Antenne in ¢ simple, minutely cili- ated. Thorax and abdomen smooth. Legs with outer tibial spurs half length of inner or less. Forewings with a slender 63 bar-like retinaculum in ¢;7, 8, 9 stalked, 10 free, no areole. Hindwings with 3 and 4 stalked, 5 from mid-way between 4 and middle of cell, 6 and 7 stalked. ALYPOPHANES IRIDOCOSMA, Nl. Sp. (Iridokosmos, variegated.) 3 9, 18-20 mm. Head rosy; face pale-yellow. Palpi ochreous-whitish. Antenne whitish; in ¢ with minute cili- ations (+). Thorax rosy, apices of tegule and patagia grey. Abdomen grey with some rosy scales; a conspicuous snow- white spot on dorsum of second segment with a lateral rosy spot on each side of it; tuft pale-ochreous. Legs whitish ; anterior tibie and tarsi fuscous. Forewings elongate-trian- gular, costa nearly straight for %, then moderately arched, apex rounded, termen bowed, oblique; ochreous-yellow; a grey spot containing some rosy scales at base; a somewhat quadrangular grey blotch on costa before middle, extending to near dorsum, indented on dorsal aspect, containing a rosy central spot; a large grey terminal blotch reaching to tornus and on costa nearly to apex, its costal edge rosy; leaving a narrow streak of ground colour on apical part of termen; cilia ochreous-yellow. Hindwings with termen rounded ; ochreous-yellow ; a short median crimson streak from base ; a large grey blotch containing some rosy suffusion occupying whole of dorsal and terminal areas, except edge of termen, acutely indented by ground colour in mid-disc; cilia ochre- ous-yellow, on dorsum grey. Type in Coll. Turner. N.Q., Kuranda, in October, April, and May; five speci- mens received from Mr. F. P. Dodd. Section NOCTUIN A. OPHIDERES PYROCRANA, ND. Sp. (Purokranos, with fiery head.) 3, 64 mm. Head iridescent purple, posterior edge red- dish-brown. Palpi, second joint iridescent purple, internal surface ochreous; terminal joint long (2 second), and dilated before apex, fuscous, an iridescent blue spot on subapical dilation on internal and external surfaces, extreme apex pale- ochreous. Antenne fuscous; in ¢ naked. Thorax reddish- brown with some purplish reflections anteriorly. Abdomen deep yellow, terminal joint fuscous. Legs ochreous, tarsi and apices of tibiz fuscous, anterior tibiz densely hairy, above fuscous, towards base reddish-brown, with a pale-ochreous median spot, beneath ochreous. Forewings triangular, costa strongly arched, apex tolerably acute, termen scarcely bowed, 64 oblique, dorsum with a strong antemedian tooth; dark-green- ish; a darker line from 4 costa to + dorsum succeeded by a bluish-purple iridescent suffusion; an irregularly pentagonal darker discal spot; a postmedian line from # costa to mid- dorsum, preceded by a bluish-purple iridescent suffusion; a similar but less marked suffusion along termen; cilia con- colorous.. Hindwings with termen rounded; deep-yellow ; a blackish terminal band, very broad at apex, narrowing to a point at tornus; cilia fuscous. . Type in Coll. Turner. N.Q., Kuranda, in May; one specimen received from Mr. F. P. Dodd. IscHyJA CYANOPASTA, n. sp. (A-uanopastos, sprinkled with bluish.) 3, 64 mm. , Head, palpi, thorax, and abdomen dark- fuscous, very sparsely irrorated with white specks. Antenne dark-fuscous; in