a! ee _ <> i i af \ > . " ‘ * a i . ; 4 ¥ + > ~e a a ’ Le : Ane < . » * * a4 ‘ a © . ay a z - ap res Merrill’s English Cexts WALDEN BY ; HENRY DAVID THOREAU } EDITED WITH AN INTRODUCTION AND NOTES BY J. MILNOR DOREY, A. M. (HARV.), INSTRUCTOR iN ENGLISH, HIGH SCHOOL, TRENTON, —N..._J. i NEW YORK CHARLES E. MERRILL CO. 44-60 East TWENTY-THIRD STREET Copyricut, 1910 BY CHARLES E. MERRILL CO, E c.A256696 - ene See ee - * oN aes kee, Rn a eee a! PUBLISHERS’ NOTE Merrill's English Cexts Tus series of books will include in complete editions those masterpieces of English Literature that are best adapted for the use of schools and colleges. The editors of the several volumes will be chosen for their special qualifications in connection with the texts to be issued under their individual supervision, but familiarity with the practical needs of the classroom, no less than sound scholarship, will characterize the editing of every book in the series. In connection with each text, a critical and historical intro- duction, including a sketch of the life of the author and his re- lation to the thought of his time, critical opinions of the work in question chosen from the great body of English criticism, and, where possible, a portrait of the author, will be given. Ample explanatory notes of such passages in the text as call for special attention will be supplied, but irrelevant annotation and explana- tions of the obvious will be rigidly excluded. CHARLES E. MERRILL CO. PREFACE The aim of preparing an edition of Thoreau’s Walden for school use is to furnish one text, at least, which can be studied wholly for its stimulus. But it will have to be carefully taught. There are in Walden pure nature descriptions, arraignments of national and social life, mystic speculations lost in metaphor and allusion, and a great deal of talk about real happiness, ideals, and the things of the soul. To present these matters to young people so that they get an idea, not a fact; catch a noble vision, ’ not mere comments on life, the teacher should know much more of Thoreau than Walden contains. There is no book on the list which demands that the teacher shall be the key and the inspira- tion more than this one. Here is a ripe opportunity for teacher and pupil. Call this an industrial age, if you will, materialistic, self-seeking, sordid; nevertheless there are many signs that the nation is considering it a short-sighted policy. Philanthropy, the development of the suburbs, the country home, fresh air funds, playgrounds, scientific and art associations, the pall of social round, the in- creasing regard for the value of life, and the development of the individual,—all prove one thing, that Mother Nature knows best how to care for her own. The cry is still to be yourself, to ex- press yourself, to be simple, eliminate the unnecessary, be pa- tient, complacent, let the soul expand. There is much truth in this, and Walden, with the right kind of teaching, can make young people see it. The introduction and notes are intended to furnish only such 5 6 PREFACE information as will be a help and not a hindrance. If some things have been omitted, it is because they are irrelevant, or obvious; if too much has been said in places, it can be passed by. A teacher should surely have the utmost freedom with such a book as this. J: MB: October 1, 1909. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH THOREAU’S PHILOSOPHY . CRITICAL OPINIONS BIBLIOGRAPHY WALDEN Economy . WHERE I LIVED, AND Does I lavas FoR READING SOUNDS SOLITUDE . VISITORS THE BusesPauas THE VILLAGE THE Ponpbs BAKER FARM HicHer Laws Brute NEIGHBORS Housre-W ARMING FORMER INHABITANTS; AND ‘Wiese Weaevons : WINTER ANIMALS . THe Ponp IN WINTER SPRING CONCLUSION . 1 EE Sa ae eae dS ela IXXAMINATION QUESTIONS - + + = > INTRODUCTION BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862), poet, naturalist, and seer, was one of that famous group of men in New England at the be- ginning of the nineteenth century who stirred the people up to a sense of the realities in themselves and life about them, and who made the best American literature that we have. His life was uneventful, part of it spent in seclusion, he tried to teach school, lectured at intervals, made lead pencils, tilled the soil, helped build houses, wrote a considerable amount of prose, and some poetry, meditated much, and, despite the fact that he was almost constantly in the open air, died of consumption at the age of forty-five. What, then, has he said and done which should give him high place among American writers and thinkers? What was his mission? Are his works of permanent value? To answer these questions satisfactorily, let us briefly examine his life in the light of the times and community in which he lived. Thoreau was born on his grandmother’s farm, a mile or so outside of Concord, Massachusetts, on July 12, 1817. His father, John Thoreau, had come to this town a few years before to con- tinue his father’s business of general merchandise, but failing, returned to the farm, only taking up residence in Concord again when the pencil-making industry drew his attention and energy. Silent, deaf, plain of speech and habit, he eked out a common- place existence in this business, varied only by rare trips to Boston, from whence he originally came, and occasional out- breaks of abolition. With none of the inherent vivacity of his 9 10 INTRODUCTION French ancestors, who emigrated from the Isle of Jersey, he made an admirable foil to his sprightly, dark-haired wife, Cynthia Dunbar, of good, Yankee, New Hampshire stock. It was im- possible to hold conversation when Mrs. Thoreau was about. Her stock of town gossip and work-a-day matters was exactly proportional to her garrulity. Such was Thoreau’s parentage. But the children made ample compensation. Helen, the oldest, was learned, practical, and kind of heart; John, Junior, was a sunny, gentle, dreamy lad to whom Mr. Emerson’s pa- thetic phrase “the hyacinthine boy” can be applied; Sophia inherited her mother’s animation, a love of art and nature, and real skill in singing and the pianoforte. And they all, Henry included, taught school,—the girls at Roxbury, the boys at Concord. The home life of these children was ideal. ‘“ Loving ~ and being loved, serving and being served,” they lived in ab- solute devotion to simplicity of taste, loftiness of aim, and the stern call of duty and learning. As Mr. Sanborn says,—‘To meet one of the Thoreaus was not the same as to encounter any other person who might happen to cross your path. Life to them was something more than a parade of pretensions, a con- flict of ambitions, or an incessant scramble for the common ob- jects of desire. They were fond of climbing to the hill-top, and could look with a broader and kindlier vision than most of us on the commotions of the plain and the mists of the valley. Without wealth, or power, or social prominence, they still held a rank of their own, in scrupulous independence, and with qual- ities that put condescension out of the question.” Out of this atmosphere evolved the paradoxical Henry,— tender to the point of sentimentality; austere to the extent of Stoicism. Dubbed “the Judge” by his playmates when ten years old, listening with patience until his mother’s volubility ceased, and then gravely continuing his interrupted remarks, stoically enduring physical pain or moral injustice, the boy would startle the family and community with sudden bursts of merriment, fantastic romps, or sallies of ardent affection. But if he loved to wander for hours in the woods or by the streams, BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH 11 gathering berries, hunting game, or fishing, or if he could doze by the hour on his father’s doorstep in some poetic reverie, he yet knew when it was “time to fetch the cows,” carry in the wood, or draw the water. In the old Concord Academy he faithfully conned his Latin and Greek, if not with ardent memory, at least with “a good understanding.”’ We can also fancy him seriously listening to Mr. Emerson lecture, on his return from Kurope, in the famous Concord Lyceum. But what to do with him? As all roads then led to Harvard College, so thither went Henry at sixteen years,—largely on the devoted Helen’s money. Harvard College at that time was a stepping stone to the gentlemanly professions, and the touchstone thereto was strict adherence to prescribed rules, creeds, and courses, the knack of making a good impression, and the exhibition of a good memory. Thoreau set all these at defiance, and consequently was grad- uated in 1837 with little distinction. He was not a bad student, but he never did his work in the prescribed way; he was not unorthodox, though the air was full of theological and phil- osophical quibbling, but he often uttered strange inconsistencies and vagaries; he was unsocial and reclusive, for he was proud, critical, and independent; he did not attain high rank or attract much scholastic attention, for he preferred to follow his genius rather than to commit to memory. But he came under the in- fluence of such men as Emerson, Lowell, Longfellow, Professor Channing, and President Quincy; he associated with such men as Edward Everett Hale, the singular poet, Jones Very, Rich- ard Henry Dana, the great scholar, Charles Stearns Wheeler, and the reformer, John Weiss. He steeped in the classics, and the Elizabethan and Reformation poets, and imbibed the new thought of Goethe, Carlyle, and Tennyson. In consequence of all this he finished his course—with nothing to do. He was un- fitted for law, medicine, or the ministry. He had no taste for business, therefore he followed the line of least resistance,—he taught school. Supplementing a little teaching experience at Canton, Massa- 12 INTRODUCTION chusetts, during a college winter, under the oversight of the Rev. Orestes Brownson, and fortified with introductory letters from his town pastor, Dr. Ezra Ripley, Emerson, and Presi- dent Quincy, he went to Maine to seek a school. Whatever the reason, he returned shortly, unsuccessful, and went at once home, resolved to try his fortunes in his native town. Setting up a private school in the famous Parkman house, he mingled instruction of Concord youth with trips on the river, into the woods, romps with the children, and fitful contributions of mystie prose to his voluble Journal, and intermittent verse to The Dial, the organ of the Transcendentalists. In 1841 he resigned school teaching with disgust, primarily because the committeemen wished him to ferule obstreperous pupils. This stretch of time was marked by two events,—his introduction to the lecture platform before he was twenty-one, and a memorable trip on the Concord and Merrimack rivers with his favorite brother John—the brother for whom he gave up his dearest possession,—the love of a woman. Between the years 1841-1845, at the invitation of his friend Emerson, he took up his residence with him, partly to tutor the Emerson children, partly to revive his father’s business of lead pencil making, partly to carry on his miscellaneous handi- crafts of surveying, farming, carpentering, and largely to muse, write, tramp about, and “ find himself.’’ This period was marked by two important events,—the death of his brother John, from which he never really recovered, and a few months’ sojourn in the home of Mr. William Emerson, Staten Island. His friends hoped that this trip would end with profitable literary acquaint- ances in New York, but, apart from the genuine friendship of the eccentric Horace Greeley, who did give him real service, nothing came of it, and we behold Henry once more in Concord as much at sea as ever. But in March, 1845, he determined once and for all to test the worth of the philosophy which had been de- veloping within him. Unable to adapt himself to life as he found it, and conscious of peculiar physical, mental, and spiritual needs of his own, he went to dwell by himself on the banks of Walden BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH 13 _ pond, near Concord, there to live a life of self-productiveness, self-culture, and simplicity. The experiment was to be the su- preme test of his life. For two years Thoreau lived this life of solitude and medita- tion, at an average cost of twenty-seven cents a week for food. The life was to be a development of his personality, and in this sense only it was a success. He studied nature, the names and habits of the flowers, the ways of the animals, and, when visitors intruded on him, or he condescended to intrude himself on the town, he studied human nature. In Walden we have his best thought, his choicest style, his noblest visions, and his common- est sense. As he states, he did not propose a scheme for all men. All he asked was to be let alone to try it. If it turned out well, others might reasonably imitate him; if ill, he would have harmed no one. Mr. Salt says: “He was a student when he went to Walden; when he returned to Concord, he was a teacher.” The fifteen years from September, 1847, when he returned to Concord, until his death were full of many interests. He first returned to Mr. Emerson’s home as business agent for his affairs while the latter was in England, later going to his old home, where he divided his time between whitewashing and lecturing; tending garden and taking tramps to Cape Cod or Canada; sur- veying land or farming, and writing no end of wonderful ob- servations in his Journal, or editing the accounts of his trips for later publication. These trips were made for the most part with his intimate friend, Ellery Channing, who styled them- selves, “Knights of the Umbrella and the Bundle.” Their most notable trip was to Canada in 1850; their last one in 1858 to the Maine Woods. His lectures, delivered mostly in Concord, but a few elsewhere, covered everything from “Wild Apples,’ at which everyone laughed, but later voted the best lecture of the course, to “The Connection between Man’s Employment and his Higher Life,’’ delivered in Worcester, the home of his friend Blake. Two significant incidents mark this work of his later life. He manufactured one thousand dollars’ worth of pencils to pay a debt of one hundred dollars, and having made a perfect 14 INTRODUCTION pencil refused to make another one. In 1857 the famous John Brown came to Concord to visit Mr. Sanborn, and was intro- duced to Thoreau. At intervals before this, Thoreau had had much to say, and in burning language, about the Fugitive Slave Law, and abolition in general. From the moment of meeting, he idolized Brown, became his champion, and when, after Brown’s arrest in October, 1859, he delivered that keen, prophetic speech which for boldness and power was unequaled, and which is still read with wonder, the world awoke to the fact that the poet- naturalist, the recluse, had something to say about man, society, and national affairs which must be reckoned with. Concord now had an illustrious townsman, American Literature a new name, and the world a heritage. Thoreau wanted to die in the harness. His premonitory ill- ness in 1841 and again in 1855 only made him work the harder, and exhibit his unfailing optimism. He said: “Sickness should not be allowed to extend farther than the body.” All through the waning days, he wrote, walked, when able, edited, lectured, ever conscious of the tightening grip of his inheritance,—con- sumption. Writing when not able to sit up, surrounded with flowers and other tokens of a host of friends, and with unfailing patience, resignation, and trust in God, he died, May 6, 1862. His sister Sophia said: “I feel as if something very beautiful had happened,—not death.” Thoreau lies in a quiet nook in “Sleepy Hollow,” the village cemetery. The writings of Thoreau may be classified as follows: 1840-1844. The Dial. A few contributions to this journal un- collected. The poetical translations, notably Prometheus Bound. 1849. A Week on the Concord and Merrimack Rivers. A record — of observations made by Thoreau and his brother John of all phases of nature for one week beginning Saturday, August 31, 1839, while boating on these rivers. 1854. Walden; or, Life in the Woods. 1863. Excursions. A collection of observations made on walks, and some lectures written at different times, and treating BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH 15 such themes as “ Night and Moonlight,” “ Wild Apples,”’ “A Winter Walk,” “Autumnal Tints,” ete. 1864. The Maine Woods. Contains the accounts of three trips to the Maine Woods made in 1846, 1853, and 1857 for the purpose of studying the trees, plants, birds, animals, and Indians. Edited by his friend Channing. 1864. Cape Cod. An account of the people, beach, lights, towns, occupations, and the ocean in this locality, made in three trips from 1849 to 1855. Edited by Channing. 1865. Letters to Various Persons. Containing some of his more intimate letters, and his shorter poems, such as “Sym- pathy,” “The Fisher’s Boy,’ “Smoke,” ete. Edited by Emerson. 1866. A Yankee in Canada, with Anti-Slavery and Reform Papers. A trip of one week in the province of Quebec made in the fall of 1850, and describing the people, country, and city of Quebec. The second part of the book contains the famous John Brown lectures, dis- cussions of slavery in general, a sketch of Thomas Car- lyle, ete. Edited by Channing. 1881. Early Spring in Massachusetts. Extracts taken from his Journal, written down at various times about spring, and edited by his friend H. G. O. Blake. 1884. Summer. The same, for this season. 1887. Winter. The same, for this season. 1894. Familiar Letters. Supplementary to the edition of 1865. Edited by F. B. Sanborn. Note.—On May 27, 1909, there were sold in New York eleven manuscripts of poems written before the year 1841, and be- lieved to be unpublished, on such themes as “The Soul’s Season,” “Farewell,” “Life is a Summer’s Day,” “Inspiration,” “The Fall of the Leaf,’’ and several shorter ones with no titles. THOREAU’S PHILOSOPHY Although Thoreau may well stand on his own feet, no one doubts that much of his belief is a product of the times in which he lived, and in particular, of the town in which he lived. The times bred a new creed, and a new philosophy,—Unitarianism, and Transcendentalism; and Concord, Massachusetts, nourished many of their leading spirits. Unitarianism was a revolt against orthodox Calvinism. Where Calvinism said that man is essentially bad, Unitarianism said he was born in the image of God, and God is good. Where the one said that obedience to established authority is the way of salvation, the other said that spiritual freedom meant spiritual growth. Sin and sorrow to the one were eternal facts, to the other they were shadows. The one taught terror, formalism, divine partiality; the other taught faith and love, freedom of thought, divine sympathy and justice for all. Ellery Channing, Thoreau’s close friend, was a chief exponent of the creed. Old Dr. Ripley, the town pastor of Concord, who lived in the “Manse,” the home of Hawthorne and Emerson in turn, was dyed in the wool. Transcendentalism was an enlargement of Unitarianism, al- though the adherents of the two beliefs could not agree. The new creed harked back to the traditional religion of our Puritan forefathers in England; the new philosophy crystallized the stern doctrine of work of Carlyle, the socialistic tendencies of Coleridge and Southey, the vagaries of Shelley, in England, and the rationalism of Kant, Richter, and Goethe in Germany. These two general streams are divergent; but they had one source. They believed in the inherent good in human nature, and the right and tendency of man to express himself. Its very name 16 THOREAU’S PHILOSOPHY 17 implies a belief in a life which goes beyond mere laws or scientific facts. In America, Emerson, Bronson Alcott, father of the fa- mous Louisa Alcott, Margaret Fuller, editor of The Dial, and others spread this new thought. To the above they added the Pantheism of Wordsworth, and there you have a complete unit. There is an invisible world enveloping the real; man is endowed with innate perceptions to penetrate this world, each for him- self. Emerson summarizes the belief in a note in his diary. “A man contains all that is needful to his government within himself. . . . All real good or evil that can befall him must be from himself.’ . . . There is a correspondence between the human soul and everything that is known to man. Instead of studying things without, the principles of them all may be penetrated into within him. . . . The purpose of life seems to be to acquaint man with himself. . . . The highest revelation is that God is in every man.’ But not all votaries of this mystic philosophy could keep a clear head and preserve their mental equilibrium. Twice, some of the faithful formed socialistic or communistic societies near Boston which they called “Brook Farm,” and “Fruitlands,’’ where each one was to have some daily, manual toil, all were to have possessions in common, and much time for thought. Both schemes failed for the reasons which Emerson, who could not share in these tan- gents of the belief, states. ‘They hold themselves aloof. They are striking work and erying out for somewhat worthy to do. They are lonely; the spirit of their writing and conver- sation is lonely; they repel influences; they shun general so- ciety. . . . They are not good citizens, not good members of society; unwillingly they bear their part of the public and private burdens; they do not willingly share in the public char- ities, in the public religious rites, in the enterprise of education, of missions, foreign or domestic, in the abolition of the slave trade, or in the temperance society. They do not even like to vote.” To-day there is no such recognized school of doctrine, but the influence of this school of thinkers is still widening. It has taught revolt against tradition, hope for and belief in the 18 INTRODUCTION individual, and the purity of spiritual things. Both creed and philosophy truly created the New England Renaissance. At Concord Thoreau basked in the sunlight of this inspiring thought, and associated all his days with those who produced the light. Concord was the center of a solar system. There was the eccentric, mystic Alcott, the dreamy Hawthorne, the fan- tastic poet, Channing, the sturdy farmer, Hosmer, the brilliant essayist, Curtis, Margaret Fuller, the ‘‘new woman” of her day, Emerson, the seer, Webster, the orator, Hoar, “the first citi- zen of Concord,” and Dr. Ripley, the preacher. Besides these there were Horace Greeley, who, from his office at the Tribune in New York, helped Thoreau to publishers; Walt Whitman in New Jersey, Blake in Worcester, Mrs. Brown at Plymouth, and Mr. Ricketson at New Bedford. All these by their ideas, writ- ings, friendship, or sympathy, helped create the atmosphere which Thoreau breathed. Concord itself was the home of the “embattled farmers,’ whose very revolutionary spirit made that “very dissidence of dissent,” of which Burke spoke. It was the hot-bed of abolition, a foree which was nothing less than a prac- tical expression of the New England creed and philosophy be- fore discussed. It was the pioneer town of culture, the origi- nator of the Reading Room and the Lyceum. It was the mecca of the literary clientele of America, whose visits only added their piece to this intellectual mosaic. Besides, Concord, repos- ing on the banks of the placid river of that name, slumbering in the many historic and literary memories, amid rolling hills, calm lakes, and inviting stretches of woodland, was the spot for meditation, development of the inner life, a love of nature, and a stimulus to “Orphie utterances.’’ As Thoreau himself says of the features of this town and environment: “Here I have been these forty years learning the language of these fields that I may the better express myself.”’ The personality of Thoreau was so unique, both from heredity and environment, that it will be necessary to examine it before studying the philosophy of the man. Channing describes him as having a face once seen, could not be forgotten, with aquiline THOREAU’S PHILOSOPHY 19 nose, large, overhanging brows, deep-set, blue eyes, expressive of all shades of feeling; a forehead full of concentrated energy and purpose, a mouth with prominent lips, pursed up with thought, dark brown hair, fine and abundant. He walked with clenched hands, his eyes bent on the ground, in a long, swinging gait, all expressive of an intensity of mind. His voice was musical. In dress he was plain to the point of affectation. And he was plain in manners. He talked with a natural gravity and openness. He did not gossip.| He attracted the children, farm- ers, illiterate, and animals, giving out much, and getting some- thing in return. If he avoided society in general it was for temperamental, not constitutional reasons. He seemed cold, but he exhaled love. Truth, Love, and Life were his trilogy. He objected to being called a hermit. | If Louisa Alcott defined a philosopher as “a man up in a balloon, with his friends holding the ropes and trying to haul him to earth,’’ Thoreau believed that he always had his anchor out. He was simply independ- ent, self-satisfied, boastful. His varied crafts prove him prac- tical. As a friend said, “Henry Thoreau was fifty years in ad- vance of his times.’’ Probably this was due to his buoyant health, vitality, optimistic spirit, abstemious habits, and clear brain. He could walk interminably, climb impossible hills, and see everything that was going on. Emerson says that he knew the country like a fox; always carried knives, twine, spyglasses, and books about with him; climbed trees and waded pools; that snakes coiled round his leg, fishes swam into his hand, and foxes came to him for protection. Thoreau’s account in his Journal of meeting a heifer is one of the purest idyls in the English language. We know that he could run, fish, hunt, skate, swim, and row. Emerson also says: “He was bred to no profession; he never married; he lived alone; he never went to church; he never voted; he refused to pay a tax to the State; he ate no flesh, he drank no _ wine, he never knew the use of tobacco; and, though a naturalist, he used neither trap nor gun. He chose, wisely, no doubt, for himself to be the bachelor of thought and nature. He had no talent for wealth, but he knew how to be poor. He had no 20 INTRODUCTION temptations to fight; no taste for trifles. He much preferred a good Indian to a dinner-party, and the chickadees to the D. Ds. No truer American existed than Thoreau.” Thoreau was a lover of Truth, and his aim in life was to seek it. He sought it, and he taught others to seek it in the things of daily life, in society, business, friendship, nature, and religion. As Burroughs says, ‘It is Thoreau’s heroic moral fibre that takes us.’’ Let us consider this aim in relation to his attitude toward Nature, Society, and Life, following with a brief dis- cussion of his Style, and Place in Literature. Thoreau is usually called the poet-naturalist, and surely this title is apt, for he viewed nature not with the analyst’s eye but with the poet’s. He had studied all the naturalists, and could name all the flowers, trees, birds, and animals, and could talk sympathetically about their ways. In early life he was fond of fishing and trapping, but he soon came to feel that there was something behind the bird or fish which helped to interpret the mood you were in, and which you lost if you snared the creature. He put himself on friendly terms with turtles, jays, squirrels, and frogs; he loved fogs, wind, marshes, and weeds. He was alive to every sound and sight, a sort of barometer to nature. And when he talked or wrote of these things, he used the lan- guage of a poet. He spoke of the plain sorrel as “blood mantling in the cheek of the beautiful year,” or the “marriage of flowers spotting the meadows and fringing the hedges with pearls and diamonds.’ He had no patience with the dissector, and always said that sympathy with intelligence was higher than knowledge. But he knew all the books about nature, from Aristotle to Lin- neus, and in his own works we have valuable contributions to geology, botany, and general nature study. We have the names of rocks, the ways of streams, the soundings of ponds, and the formation of hills; but we have the color of the trees, and water, the smell of the soil, and the blessings of work. We have in- numerable Latin names of flowers, but we have the exalted mood of mind which they suggest. We have the characteristics of storms, the changes in weather, and the minute doings of small THOREAU’S PHILOSOPHY a1 creatures; but back of it all is deeper vision, purer messages, and a loving soul. He was always catching some vision, seeing some mental sunset, finding some mystic truth. What he lost in man he found in nature. His tendency to seclusion probably made him seem eccentric, and bred a half contempt for man, but he disclaimed any hatred of society, and really believed that his idea of living was more truely social. He uttered from time to time tirades on the luxury, commercial ambitions, and materialism of men, and no doubt often missed the reasons for the existence of organized society as we have it. But he was undoubtedly right in preaching that the simplifica- tion of life and a wholesome love of nature were sure roads to peace and happiness. As he said: “In society you will not find health, but in nature. Society is always diseased and the best is the most so.’’ Naturally, then, Thoreau lacked social graces and general geniality. He was polite, and grave, but usually cold and awkward in manner. He would not gossip, and his humor was either commonplace or grotesque. His whole bear- ing was of the self-improver. Society, friendship, business re- lations, love itself were considered only as elements in his self- culture. Roberts believes that his renunciation of the only love that came to him was not so much to make his brother happy, as to enjoy the “fine ectasy of self-sacrifice.” In short, his conception of social development was individualistic rather than organic. He had little sympathy for reforms, arguing that “Life is not for complaint but for satisfaction.’’ Look within, find where your roots are; do not patch up on the surface. Hap- piness does not come from adding to the machinery of civiliza- tion, but in reducing it to its lowest terms. If we all cannot follow his lead, we have learned something about the relation of industry to leisure, and the doctrine of contentment. If he once refused to pay a tax, and went to jail, because his con- science told him the state was unjust, he was still the “simpli- fier, and not the nullifier of civilization.” If he was an egoist, he gave of his best to the world; if he scorned man’s ways, he mastered nature’s. And in all, he was truly religious. When 22 INTRODUCTION finally exhorted to make his peace with God, he replied: “I have never quarreled with him.” Thoreau’s style was the product of three forces,—his exten- sive reading, his intimacy with nature, and the variety of themes he chose for expression of himself. Add to this a painstaking and methodical authorship. His scholarship in the classics was sound. He knew his Latin and Greek, and possessed a good knowledge of French, with some acquaintance of the other modern languages. In his reading he favored the classics, Homer, Pindar, Aristotle, Pliny, Virgil, and the rest; while in English he read constantly of Chaucer, Milton, the Elizabethan lyric poets, the ballads, and, of modern times, only Carlyle. He loved to study the Hindoo books of religion, but he never waded deep. Each of the above writers contributed something of nature, elegance of style, philosophy, or general inspiration. He did not care for novels, and could not abide the newspaper. Because of this type of reading, then, we see in his style, a marked scholarship, a purity, and dignity of utterance which puts him on a high plane. The next element was contributed by his wild love of nature, a sense of kinship which gave a pungency, or tang to his phrases which carry one to the tops of the hills, to the bottom of the streams, and to the secrets of the dells. It combined quaintness with charm, humor with loving sincerity. Roberts, in speaking of Walden, says that it “is a book in which homely sense and heavenly insight jostle each other on the page”; and that “its style is a kind of celestial homespun, plain, often harsh, but interwoven not seldom with the radiance of a white and soaring imagination.’’ The variety of his themes,— morality, bird life, philosophy, economics, Indian lore, climate, personal traits, religion, politics, sunsets, rabbits, love, ete., developed a tendency to antithesis, even paradox, which has given American literature some of its best epigrams. They all possess poetic flavor, though in poetical expression Thoreau can hardly be called metrical. He was a poet only in the philosophic sense that Emerson was. As Emerson himself said of Thoreau’s poetry, “The thyme and marjoram are not yet honey.’ Most THOREAU’S PHILOSOPHY 23 of his epigrammatic sayings have been culled from his Journal or those works which were but enlargements of this prolific diary and commonplace book. He wrote carefully each day in this book thoughts as they would come to him, often noting them down in a smaller book which he carried with him on his walks. But he never let it stand as complete until he had cut and pol- ished it into the gem he wanted. The following will illustrate this dominant quality of his style. ‘Conscience is instinct bred in the house.’”’ ‘Nature made ferns for pure leaves, to show what she could do in that line.” “Fire is the most tolerable third party.” ‘The bluebird carries the sky on his back.” “Nothing is so much to be feared as fear.” “A little thought is sexton to all the world.’”’ ‘How can we expect a harvest of thought who have not had seed-time of character?” “A man is rich in proportion to the number of things which he can afford to let alone.”” ‘The heart is forever inexperienced.” “It takes two to speak the truth,—one to speak, and another to hear.” He speaks of the call of the marsh-hawk as “a split squeal,” “the locust’s z-ing,” “a rill, purling round its storied pebble,” “a gull pure white, a wave of foam in the air.” And so it goes. As Professor Wendell says, “the man was in his own way a literary artist of unusual merit.”’ And Thoreau himself, when comment- ing on the effusiveness of De Quincey’s style, could give no better verdict on his own sentences which are what De Quincey’s are not,—“ his sentences are not concentrated and nutty,—sentences which suggest far more than they say, which have an atmosphere about them. . . . Sentences which are expressive, towards which so many volumes, so much life, went; which lie like boul- ders on the page up and down, or across; which contain the seed of other sentences, not mere repetition, but creation.” As to Thoreau’s final resting place in literature, many have been and will be divided in opinion. Roberts calls him a Stoic; Stevenson says he is an Epicure. Hawthorne found him a “del- icate observer of nature”; Lowell said “he was not by nature an observer,’’ that he saw “only the things he looked for.’’ Em- erson said he was an “idealist with robust common sense,” a 24 INTRODUCTION “truth-seeker, made for the noblest society.”” Lowell speaks of his “intellectual selfishness,” says “to be misty is not to be mystic,” that he had “not a healthy mind,” “no humor,” that “eommunion with nature made him cynical,” and that he was “not a strong thinker, but a sensitive feeler.”” Stevenson calls him a “prig,”’ “skulker,” “egoist,” “dry,” and his philosophy as ‘a bald-headed picture of life.’”’” One has said that “his works give one the feeling of a sky full of tears”; others have devoted whole articles to The New England Quack, and The Yankee Hum- bug. All these things may be true, seen from one’s peculiar angle. He may have been eccentric, unsocial, as the world de- fines the word, austere, intolerant, self-satisfied, lacking in the warm blood of life, but he lived his life as he had planned it, left his heritage, and delivered his message. As Stevenson says, “his needle pointed steadily north.” If he did not get down in the stream, he stood on the heights and pointed the way. He lived in the present, but he conceived it as only a fragment of time. When he died he felt that he had just begun to live, but no one could have resigned himself to the inevitable with greater patience. His complacence was born of conviction. If, as Madam Hoar said, he talked about Nature as if she had been born and brought up in Concord, he merely lacked a conception of size, and, as Emerson said, the Atlantic was but a large Wal- den Pond. If he was averse to society in the popular sense, no one had a purer conception of love and friendship. If he was indifferent to fame, he thereby earned the right to it. He lacked a sense of social and political organization, but got at the heart of things through the individual. He lacked ambition for the things man usually craves, but he had few wants, real pleasures, and had found his work. His nature may have been too mystic to fit in with shifting times, but thereby he speaks for all time. He had defects of temperament, but his sincerity, simplicity, and intensity of soul made them trivial. He may be a solitary figure in American history and literature, but he was the one figure who cleared the atmosphere in that day of “struggle for fresh air.’’ His voice was heard and felt on both sides of the THOREAU’S PHILOSOPHY 25 Atlantic, and the echoes are increasing to-day. This may be a day of organization and commercialism, but we are seeing the folly of a lot of it. There is a universal call from Mother Nature to come back. What is Thoreau’s rank and service? Carlyle taught the gospel of Work; Ruskin taught the blessings of Hu- manity; Arnold preached Culture; Emerson encouraged one to Self-reliance, but Thoreau has given us the way to Truth and the Simple Life. Let him speak for himself: THE FISHER’S BOY My life is like a stroll upon the beach, As near the ocean’s edge as I can go; My tardy steps its waves sometimes o’erreach, Sometimes I stay to let them overflow. My sole employment ’tis, and scrupulous care, To place my gains beyond the reach of tides,— Each smoother pebble, and each shell more rare, Which Ocean kindly to my hand confides. I have but few companions on the shore: They scorn the strand who sail upon the sea; Yet oft I think the ocean they’ve sailed o’er Is deeper known upon the strand to me. The middle sea contains no crimson dulse, Its deeper waves cast up no pearls to view; Along the shore my hand is on its pulse, And I converse with many a shipwrecked crew. CRITICAL OPINIONS Thoreau, though a naturalist by habit, and a moralist by con- stitution, was inwardly a poet by force of that shaping and con- trolling imagination, which was his strongest faculty. His mind naturally tended to the ideal side. He would have been an idealist in any circumstances; a fluent and glowing poet, had he been born among a people to whom poesy is native, like the Greeks, the Italians, the Irish. As it was, his poetic hight illu- mined every wide prospect and every narrow cranny in which his active, patient spirit pursued its task.—F. B. Sanborn, in his Life of Thoreau. Thoreau’s strength was in his moral nature, and in his obsti- nate refusal to mortgage himself, his time, or his opinions, even to the State or the Church. The haughtiness of his independence kept him from a thousand temptations that beset men of less courage and self-denial.—J/bid. Though often ranked as an unbeliever, and too scornful in some of his expressions concerning the religion of other men, Thoreau was in truth deeply religious. Sincerity and devotion were his most marked traits.—Ibid. Thoreau’s traits readily yield themselves to paradox. A primal delight in wild, rank nature was combined with a rare fineness of sense and intellect. A stoical self-control and com- placency coexisted with a supersensitive and tender heart to- wards all forms of life. A keen inventive and manual skill, with much practical sagacity, was directed by a brain which daily speculated upon problems of Attic philosophy and Transcenden- talism. He was at the same time conservative and radical, self- reliant and self-depreciative, industrious and leisurely.—A.. R. Marble, in her Thoreau, His Home, Friends, and Books. 26 CRITICAL OPINIONS 27 If simplicity, sincerity, leisure, industry, contentment, were at the roots of his philosophy, its branches were truth, purity, justice, and faith. It would be tautologic to example these traits in Thoreau’s life. They were its firm, increasing elements, they became the motors of steadfast, noble acts and words. Truth was the beacon of his character, and its full glare he turned upon his ideals, his deeds, and his faith.—Jbid. He can speak as a seer to these later decades. He foretold the necessary conditions, the foundation-stones of a moral and up- lifting community,—simplicity, integrity, work, and content- ment. He prophesied the decadence of fibres of intellect and soul in a civilization which becomes careless of the higher nature, which becomes absorbed in materialism, luxuries, and artificial society. To guard against such temptations for himself and mankind, he found sanative blessings in joyful industry, nature- comradeship, simple tastes, and spiritual refreshment and se- renity. Many of the conditions of contemporaneous life evi- dence the sure vision and the moral insight of the philosopher. In retrospect, as well as in prophecy, we can recognize his prac- tical wisdom, we can still gain recuperation and inspiration in his messages, that seem to have added pertinence and potency in these later decades, thrilling with the spirit of reform for the sociological and industrial evils that confront this new century.— Ibid. Thoreau was a friend, deeply loved and eagerly sought by men and women of diverse natures. With all his ideal demands, he mingled a rare charity for actual words and acts; he was per- sonally humble and full of practical aid. He was ready to ap- preciate the services of his friends, capable of understanding their generous motives, even better than their impulsive acts, he was a cheerful, intellectual comrade, though always disparag- ing his own merits in idealizing the qualities of his friends.—Jbzd. It is Thoreau’s heroic moral fibre that takes us. It is never relaxed; it is always braced for the heights. He was an unusual mixture of the poet, the naturalist, and the moralist; but the moralist dominated. . . . Thoreau’s virtue is a kind of 28 INTRODUCTION stimulating contrariness; there is no compliance in him: he always says and does the unexpected thing, but always leaves us braced for better work and better living. . . . Asa naturalist Thoreau’s aim was ulterior to science: he loved the bird, but he loved more the bird behind the bird,—the idea it suggested, the mood of his mind it interpreted. . . . His fame has increased from year to year. Other names in our literature have faded; while his own has grown brighter and brighter, and the meridian is not yet.—John Burroughs. A truth-speaker he, capable of the most deep and strict con- versation; a physician to the wounds of any soul; a friend, knowing not only the secret of friendship, but almost worshipped by those few persons who resorted to him as their confessor and prophet, and knew the deep value of his mind and great heart. His soul was made for the noblest society; he had in a short life exhausted the capabilities of this world; wherever there is knowledge, wherever there is virtue, wherever there is beauty, he will find a home.—Emerson, at Thoreau’s funeral. Truth, audacity, force, were among Thoreau’s mental char- acteristics, devoted to humble uses. His thoughts burned like flame, so earnest was his conviction. He was transported in- finitely beyond the regions of self when pursuing his objects, single-hearted, doing one thing at a time and doing that in the best way! Self-reliance shall serve as his motto,— ‘* His cold eye truth and conduct scanned.” His love of wildness was real. Whatever sport it was of Na- ture, this child of an old civilization, this Norman boy with the blue eyes and brown hair, held the Indian’s creed, and believed in the essential worth and integrity of plant and animal. This was a religion to him; to us, mythical. He spoke from a deeper conviction than ordinary, which enforced on him that sphere of rule of life he kept. So far an anchorite, a recluse, as never to seek popular ends, he was yet gifted with the ability and courage to be a captain of men. Heroism he possessed in its highest sense,—the will to use his means to his ends, and these the best.— W. E. Channing, in Thoreau: The Poet-Naturalist. BIBLIOGRAPHY F. B. Sanborn: “ Henry D. Thoreau,” in American Men of Letters. The standard biography for facts. Annie Russell Marble: Thoreau: His Home, Friends, and Books. The latest biography (1902) for complete information and sympathetic insight. W. E. Channing: Thoreau: The Poet-Naturalist. ‘A mine of curious information on a thousand topics,” as Sanborn says, containing much from his Journal never before published. G. W. Curtis: “Thoreau,” in Homes of American Authors. Clear and readable. R. W. Emerson: “ Biographical Sketch,”’ in Thoreau’s Excursions. The best brief estimate of the man. Nathaniel Hawthorne: Passages from the American Note-Books. Cursory, but interesting. J. R. Lowell: My Study Windows. Rather censorious, but ap- preciative. T. W. Higginson: Short Studies of American Authors. To be ranked with Curtis’s sketch. John Burroughs: “Henry D. Thoreau,” in Library of the World’s Best Literature. The word of one Naturalist about an- other. R. L. Stevenson: Henry David Thoreau: His Character and Opinions. Rather whimsical, but full of kindly judgments. H. 8. Salt: The Life of Henry David Thoreau. An Englishman’s point of view. Besides the works of the above famous literary men, have appeared many monographs and magazine articles from the same pens and many others, notably Alger, Aleott, Henry James, Conway, Scudder, Holmes, Professors Beers and Wendell, Gar- nett, Besant, George Ripley, etc. 29 WALDEN ECONOMY WueEn I wrote the following pages, or rather the bulk of them, I lived alone, in the woods, a mile from any neighbor; in a house which I had built myself, on the shore of Walden Pond, in Concord, Massachusetts,! and earned my living by the labor of my hands only. I lived there two years and two months. At present I am a sojourner in civilized life again. I should not obtrude my affairs so much on the no- tice of my readers if very particular inquiries had not been made by my townsmen concerning my mode of life, which some would call impertinent, though they do not appear to me at all impertinent, but, consider- ing the circumstances, very natural and pertinent. Some have asked what I got to eat; if I did not feel lonesome; if I was not afraid; and the like. Others have been curious to learn what portion of my income I devoted to charitable purposes; and some, who have large families, how many poor children I maintained. I will therefore ask those of my readers who feel no particular interest in me to pardon me if I undertake to answer some of these questions in this book. In 31 32 WALDEN most books, the J, or first person, is omitted; in this it will be retained; that, in respect to egotism, is the main difference. We commonly do not remember that it is, after all, always the first person that is speaking. I should not talk so much about myself if there were anybody else whom I knew as well. Un- fortunately, I am confined to this theme by the nar- rowness of my experience. Moreover, I, on my side, require of every writer, first or last, a simple and sin- cere account of his own life, and not merely what he has heard of other men’s lives; some such account as he would send to his kindred from a distant land; for if he has lived sincerely, it must have been in a distant land to me. Perhaps these pages are more particularly addressed to poor students. As for the rest of my readers, they will accept such portions as apply to them. I trust that none will stretch the seams in putting on the coat, for it may do good servy- ice to him whom it fits. I would fain say something, not so much concerning the Chinese and Sandwich Islanders as you who read these pages, who are said to live in New England; something about your condition, especially your out- ward condition or circumstances in this world, in this town, what it is, whether it is necessary that it be as bad as it is, whether it cannot be improved as well as not. I have travelled a good deal in Concord; and everywhere, in shops, and offices, and fields, the inhab- itants have appeared to me to be doing penance in a thousand remarkable ways. What I have heard of ECONOMY 33 Bramins ' sitting exposed to four fires and looking in the face of the sun; or hanging suspended, with their heads downward, over flames; or looking at the heavens over their shoulders ‘‘until it becomes impossible for .them to resume their natural position, while from the twist of the neck nothing but liquids can pass into the stomach;’’ or dwelling, chained for life, at the foot of a tree; or measuring with their bodies, like caterpillars, the breadth of vast empires; or standing on one leg on the tops of pillars—even these forms of conscious penance are hardly more incredible and astonishing than the scenes which I daily witness. The twelve labors of Hercules? were trifling in comparison with those which my neighbors have undertaken; for they were only twelve, and had an end; but I could never see that these men slew or captured any monster or finished any labor. They have no friend Jolas* to burn with a hot iron the root of the hydra’s head, but as soon as one head is crushed, two spring up. I see young men, my townsmen, whose misfortune it is to have inherited farms, houses, barns, cattle, and farming tools; for these are more easily acquired than got rid of. Better if they had been born in the open pasture and suckled by a wolf, that they might have seen with clearer eyes what field they were called to labor in. Who made them serfs of the soil? Why should they eat their sixty acres, when a man is con- demned to eat only his peck of dirt? Why should they begin digging their graves as soon as they are born? They have got to live a man’s life, pushing 34 WALDEN all these things before them; and get on as well as they can. How many a poor immortal soul have I met well-nigh crushed and smothered under its load, creeping down the road of life, pushing before it a barn seventy-five feet by forty, its Augean stables ! never cleansed, and one hundred acres of land, tillage, mowing, pasture, and wood-lot! The portionless, who struggle with no such unnecessary inherited encum- brances, find it labor enough to subdue and cultivate a few cubic feet of flesh. But men labor under a mistake. The better part of the man is soon ploughed into the soil for compost. By a seeming fate, commonly called necessity, they are employed, as it says in an old book, laying up treasures which moth and rust will corrupt and thieves break through and steal. It is a fool’s life, as they will find when they get to the end of it, if not before. It is said that Deucalion and Pyrrha? created men by throwing stones over their heads behind them :— Inde genus durum sumus, experiensque laborum, Et documenta damus qua simus Origine nati. Or, as Raleigh * rhymes it in his sonorous way ,— “From thence our kind-hearted is, enduring pain and care, Approving that our bodies of a stony nature are.”’ So much for a blind obedience to a blundering oracle, throwing the stones over their heads behind them, and not seeing where they fell. Most men, even in this comparatively free country, through mere ignorance and mistake, are so occupied ECONOMY 35 with the factitious cares and superfluously coarse la- bors of life, that its finer fruits cannot be plucked by them. Their fingers, from excessive toil, are too clumsy and tremble too much for that. Actually, the laboring man has not leisure for a true integrity day by day; he cannot afford to sustain the manliest re- lations to men; his labor would be depreciated in the market. He has no time to be anything but a machine. How can he remember well his ignorance—which his growth requires—who has so often to use his knowl- edge? We should feed and clothe him gratuitously sometimes, and recruit him with our cordials, before we judge of him. The finest qualities of our nature, like the bloom on fruits, can be preserved only by the most delicate handling. Yet we do not treat ourselves nor one another thus tenderly. Some of you, we all know, are poor, find it hard to live, are sometimes, as it were, gasping for breath. I have no doubt that some of you who read this book are unable to pay for all the dinners which you have actually eaten, or for the coats and shoes which are fast wearing, or are already worn, out, and have come to this page to spend borrowed or stolen time, rob- bing your creditors of an hour. It is very evident what mean and sneaking lives many: of you live, for my sight has been whetted by experience; always on the limits, trying to get into business and trying to get out of a debt, of very ancient slough, called by the Latins ws alienum, another’s brass, for some of their coins were made of brass; still living, and dying, and 36 WALDEN buried by this other’s brass; always promising to pay, promising to pay to-morrow, and dying to-day, in- solvent; seeking to curry favor, to get custom, by how many modes, only not state-prison offences; lying, flattering, voting, contracting yourselves into a nut- shell of civility, or dilating into an atmosphere of thin and vaporous generosity, that you may persuade your neighbor to let you make his shoes, or his hat, or his coat, or his carriage, or import his groceries for him; making yourselves sick, that you may lay up something against a sick day, something to be tucked away in an old chest, or in a stocking behind the plastering, or, more safely, in the brick bank; no matter where, no matter how much or how little. I sometimes wonder that we can be so frivolous, I may almost say, as to attend to the gross but some- what foreign form of servitude called Negro Slavery, there are so many keen and subtle masters that en- slave both North and South. It is hard to have a southern overseer; it is worse to have a northern one; but worst of all when you are the slave-driver of your- self. Talk of a divinity in man! Look at the teamster on the highway, wending to market by day or night; does any divinity stir within him? His highest duty to fodder and water his horses! What is his destiny to him compared with the shipping interests? Does not he drive for Squire Make-a-stir? How godlike, how immortal, is he? See how he cowers and sneaks, how vaguely all the day he fears, not being immortal nor divine, but the slave and prisoner of his own opinion ECONOMY 37 of himself, a fame won by his own deeds. Public opinion is a weak tyrant compared with our own pri- vate opinion. What a man thinks of himself, that it is which determines, or rather indicates, his fate. Self- emancipation even in the West Indian provinces of the fancy and imagination—what Wilberforce ! is there to bring that about? Think, also, of the ladies of the land weaving toilet cushions against the last day, not to betray too green an interest in their fates! As if you could kill time without injuring eternity. The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation. What is called resignation is confirmed desperation. From the desperate city you go into the desperate country, and have to console yourself with the bra- very of minks and muskrats. A stereotyped but un- ‘ conscious despair is concealed even under what are called the games and amusements of mankind. There is no play in them, for this comes after work. But it is a characteristic of wisdom not to do desperate things. When we consider what, to use the words of the catechism, is the chief end of man, and what are the true necessaries and means of life, it appears as if men had deliberately chosen the common mode of living because they preferred it to any other. Yet they honestly think there is no choice left. But alert and healthy natures remember that the sun rose clear. It is never too late to give up our prejudices. No way of thinking or doing, however ancient, can be trusted without proof. What everybody echoes or in silence passes by as true to-day may turn out to be falsehood 38 WALDEN to-morrow, mere smoke of opinion, which some had trusted for a cloud that would sprinkle fertilizing rain on their fields. What old people say you cannot do, you try and find that you can. Old deeds for old people, and new deeds for new. Old people did not know enough once, perchance, to fetch fresh fuel to | keep the fire a-going; new people put a little dry wood under a pot, and are whirled round the globe with the speed of birds, in a way to kill old people, as the phrase is. Age is no better, hardly so well, qualified for an in- structor as youth, for it has not profited so much as it has lost. One may almost doubt if the wisest man has learned anything of absolute value by living. Practically, the old have no very important advice to give the young, their own experience has been so partial, and their lives have been such miserable fail- ures, for private reasons, as they must believe, and it may be that they have some faith left which belies that experience, and they are only less young than they were. I have lived some thirty years on this planet, and I have yet to hear the first syllable of valu- able or even earnest advice from my seniors. They have told me nothing, and probably cannot tell me anything, to the purpose. Here is life, an experiment to a great extent untried by me; but it does not avail me that they have tried it. If I have any experience which I think valuable, I am sure to reflect that this my Mentors ! said nothing about. One farmer says to me, ‘“‘ You cannot live on vege- table food solely, for it furnishes nothing to make bones ECONOMY 7 39 with;”’ and so he religiously devotes a part of his day to supplying his system with the raw material of bones; walking all the while he talks behind his oxen, which, with vegetable-made bones, jerk him and his lumber- ing plough along in spite of every obstacle. Some things are really necessaries of life in some circles, the most helpless and diseased, which in others are luxuries merely, and in others still are entirely un- known. The whole ground of human life seems to some to — have been gone over by their predecessors, both the heights and the valleys, and all things to have been eared for. According to Evelyn,! “the wise Solomon prescribed ordinances for the very distances of trees; and the Roman pretors * have decided how often you may go into your neighbor’s land to gather the acorns which fall on it without trespass, and what share be- longs to that neighbor.’’ Hippocrates * has even left directions how we should cut our nails; that is, even with the ends of the fingers, neither shorter nor longer. Undoubtedly the very tedium and ennui which pre- sume to have exhausted the variety and the joys of life are as old as Adam. But man’s capacities have never been measured; nor are we to judge of what he can do by any precedents, so little has been tried. Whatever have been thy failures hitherto, ‘be not afflicted, my child, for who shall assign to thee what thou hast left undone?”’ We might try our lives by a thousand simple tests; as, for instance, that the same sun which ripens my 40 WALDEN beans illumines at once a system of earths like ours. If I had remembered this it would have prevented some mistakes. This was not the light in which I hoed them. The stars are the apexes of what wonderful triangles! What distant and different beings in the various mansions of the universe are contemplating the same one at the same moment! Nature and human life are as various as our several constitutions. Who shall say what prospect life offers to another? Could a greater miracle take place than for us to look through each other’s eyes for an instant? We should live in all the ages of the world in an hour; ay, in all the worlds of the ages. History, Poetry, Mythology!—I know of no reading of another’s experience so startling and in- forming as this would be. The greater part of what my neighbors call good I believe in my soul to be bad, and if I repent of any- thing, it is very likely to be my good behavior. What demon possessed me that I behaved so well? You may say the wisest thing you can, old man—you who have lived seventy years, not without honor of a kind— I hear an irresistible voice which invites me away from all that. One generation abandons the enterprises of another like stranded vessels. I think that we may safely trust a good deal more than we do. We may waive just so much care of: ourselves as we honestly bestow elsewhere. Nature is as well adapted to our weakness as to our strength. The incessant anxiety and strain of some is a well-nigh incurable form of disease. We are made to exaggerate ECONOMY 41 the importance of what work we do; and yet how much is not done by us! or, what if we had been taken sick? How vigilant we are! determined not to live by faith if we can avoid it; all the day long on the alert, at night we unwillingly say our prayers and commit our- selves to uncertainties. So thoroughly and sincerely are we compelled to live, reverencing our life, and denying the possibility of change. This is the only way, we say; but there are as many ways as there can be drawn radii from one centre. All change is a miracle to contemplate; but it is a miracle which is taking place every instant. Confucius! said, “To know that we know what we know, and that we do not know what we do not know, that is true knowledge.’”’ When one man has reduced a fact of the imagination to be a fact to his understanding, I foresee that all men will at length establish their lives on that basis. Let us consider for a moment what most of the trouble and anxiety which I have referred to is about, and how much it is necessary that we be troubled, or, at least, careful. It would be some advantage to live a primitive and frontier life, though in the midst of an outward civilization, if only to learn what are the gross necessaries of life and what methods have been taken to obtain them; or even to look over the old day-books of the merchants, to see what it was that men most commonly bought at the stores, what they stored, that is, what are the grossest groceries. For the im- provements of ages have had but little influence on the essential laws of man’s existence; as our skeletons, 42 WALDEN probably, are not to be distinguished from those of our ancestors. By the words, necessary of life, I mean whatever, of all that man obtains by his own exertions, has been from the first, or from long use has become, so im- portant to human life that few, if any, whether from savageness, or poverty, or philosophy, ever attempt to do without it. To many creatures there is in this sense but’ one necessary of life, Food. To the bison of the prairie it is a few inches of palatable grass, with water to drink; unless he seeks the shelter of the forest or the mountain’s shadow. None of the brute creation requires more than Food and Shelter. The necessaries of life for man in this climate may, accurately enough, be distributed under the several heads of Food, Shelter, Clothing, and Fuel; for not till we have secured these are we prepared to entertain the true problems of life with freedom and a prospect of success. Man has in- vented, not only houses, but clothes and cooked food; and possibly from the accidental discovery of the warmth of fire, and the consequent use of it, at first a luxury, arose the present necessity to sit by it. We observe cats and dogs acquiring the same second na- ture. By proper Shelter and Clothing we legitimately retain our own internal heat; but with an excess of these, or of Fuel, that is, with an external heat greater than our own internal, may not cookery properly be said to begin? Darwin,! the naturalist, says of the inhabitants of Tierra del Fuego,? that while his own party, who were well clothed and sitting close to a fire, ECONOMY 43 were far from too warm, these naked savages, who were farther off, were observed, to his great surprise, “‘to be streaming with perspiration at undergoing such a roasting.”’ So, we are told, the New Hollander goes naked with impunity, while the European shivers in his clothes. Is it impossible to combine the hardiness of these savages with the intellectualness of the civi- lized man? According to Liebig,! man’s body is a stove, and food the fuel which keeps up the internal combustion in the lungs. In cold weather we eat more, in warm less. The animal heat is the result of a slow combustion, and disease and death take place when this is too rapid; or for want of fuel, or from some de- fect in the draught, the fire goes out. Of course, the vital heat is not to be confounded with fire; but so much for analogy. It appears, therefore, from the above list, that the expression, animal life, is nearly synonymous with the expression, animal heat; for while Food may be regarded as the Fuel which keeps up the fire within us—and Fuel serves only to pre- pare that Food or to increase the warmth of our bodies by addition from without—Shelter and Clothing also serve only to retain the heat thus generated and ab- sorbed. The grand necessity, then, for our bodies, is to keep warm, to keep the vital heat in us. What pains we accordingly take, not only with our Food, and Cloth- ing, and Shelter but with our beds, which are our night-clothes, robbing the nests and breasts of birds to prepare this shelter within a shelter, as the mole has 44 WALDEN its bed of grass and leaves at the end of its burrow! The poor man is wont to complain that this is a cold world; and to cold, no less physical than social, we refer directly a great part of our ails. The summer, in some climates, makes possible to man a sort of Elysian ! life. Fuel, except to cook his Food, is then unnecessary; the sun is his fire, and many of the fruits are sufficiently cooked by its rays; while Food gen- erally is-more various, and more easily obtained, and Clothing and Shelter are wholly or half unnecessary. At the present day, and in this country, as I find by my own experience, a few implements, a knife, an axe, a spade, a wheel-barrow, etc., and for the studious, lamplight, stationery and access to a few books, rank next to necessaries, and can all be obtained at a tri- fling cost. Yet some, not wise, go to the other side of the globe, to barbarous and unhealthy regions, and devote themselves to trade for ten or twenty years, in order that they may live—that is, keep comfortably warm—and die in New England at last. The luxuri- ously rich are not simply kept comfortably warm, but unnaturally hot; as I implied before, they are cooked, of course & la mode. Most of the luxuries, and many of the so-called comforts of life, are not only not indispensable, but positive hindrances to the elevation of mankind. With respect to luxuries and comforts, the wisest have ever lived a more simple and meagre life than the poor. The ancient philosophers, Chinese, Hindoo, Persian, and Greek, were a class than which none has been ECONOMY 45 poorer in outward riches, none so rich in inward. We know not much about them. It is remarkable that we know so much of them as we do. The same is true of the more modern reformers and benefactors of their race. None can be an impartial and wise observer of human life but from the vantage ground of what we should call voluntary poverty. Of a life of luxury the fruit is luxury, whether in agriculture, or commerce, or literature, or art. There are nowadays professors of philosophy, but not philosophers. Yet it is ad- mirable to profess because it was once admirable to live. To be a philosopher is not merely to have sub- tle thoughts, nor even to found a school, but so to love wisdom as to live according to its dictates, a life of simplicity, independence, magnanimity, and trust. It is to solve some of the problems of life, not only theoretically, but practically. The success of great scholars and thinkers is commonly a courtier-like success, not kingly, not manly. They make shift to live merely by conformity, practically as their fathers did, and are in no sense the progenitors of a nobler race of men. But why do men degenerate ever? What makes families run out? What is the nature of the luxury which enervates and destroys nations? Are we sure that there is none of it in our own lives? The philosopher is in advance of his age even in the out- ward form of his life. He is not fed, sheltered, clothed, warmed, like his contemporaries. How can a man be a philosopher and not maintain his vital heat by better methods than other men? 46 WALDEN When a man is warmed by the several modes which I have described, what does he want next? Surely not more warmth of the same kind, as more and richer food, larger and more splendid houses, finer and more abundant clothing, more numerous, incessant and hotter fires, and the like. When he has obtained those things which are necessary to life, there is another alternative than to obtain the superfluities; and that is, to adventure on life now, his vacation from humbler toil having commenced. The soil, it appears, is suited to the seed, for it has sent its radicle downward, and it may now send its shoot upward also with confidence. Why has man rooted himself thus firmly in the earth, but that he may rise in the same proportion into the heavens above?—for the nobler plants are valued for the fruit they bear at last in the air and light, far from the ground, and are not treated like the humbler escu- lents,! which, though they may be biennials, are culti- vated only till they have perfected their root, and often cut down at top for this purpose, so that most would not know them in their flowering season. I do not mean to prescribe rules to strong and valiant natures, who will mind their own affairs whether in heaven or hell, and perchance build more magnificently and spend more lavishly than the richest, without ever impoverishing themselves, not knowing how they live— if, indeed, there are any such, as has been dreamed; nor to those who find their encouragement and inspiration in precisely the present condition of things, and cherish it with the fondness and enthusiasm of lovers—and, to ECONOMY 47 some extent, I reckon myself in this number; I do not speak to those who are well employed, in whatever circumstances, and they know whether they are well employed or not; but mainly to the mass of men who are discontented, and idly complaining of the hardness of their lot or of the times, when they might improve them. There are some who complain most energeti- cally and inconsolably of any, because they are, as they say, doing their duty. I also have in my mind that seemingly wealthy, but most terribly impoverished class of all, who have accumulated dross, but know not how to use it, or get rid of it, and thus have forged their own golden or silver fetters. If I should attempt to tell how I have desired to spend my life in past years, it would probably surprise those of my readers who are somewhat acquainted with its actual history; it would certainly astonish those who know nothing about it. I will only hint at some of the enterprises which I have cherished. In any weather, at any hour of the day or night, I have been anxious to improve the nick of time, and notch it on my stick too; to stand on the meeting of two eternities, the past and future, which is precisely the present moment; to toe that line. You will pardon some obscurities, for there are more secrets in my trade than in most men’s, and yet not voluntarily kept, but inseparable from its very nature. I would gladly tell all that I know about it and never paint “No Admittance” on my gate. 48 WALDEN I long ago lost a hound, a bay horse, and a turtle- dove, and am still on their trail. Many are the trav- ellers I have spoken concerning them, describing their tracks and what calls they answered to. I have met one or two who had heard the hound, and the tramp of the horse, and even seen the dove disappear behind a cloud, and they seemed as anxious to recover them ~as if they had lost them themselves. To anticipate, not the sunrise and the dawn merely, but, if possible, Nature herself! How many morn- ings, summer and winter, before yet any neighbor was stirring about his business, have I been about mine! No doubt, many of my townsmen have met me re- turning from this enterprise, farmers starting for Boston in the twilight, or woodchoppers going to their work. It is true, I never assisted the sun materially in his rising, but, doubt not, it was of the last impor- tance only to be present at it. So many autumn, ay, and winter days, spent out- side the town, trying to hear what was in the wind, to hear and carry it express! I well-nigh sunk all my capital in it, and lost my own breath into the bargain running in the face of it. If it had concerned either ot the political parties, depend upon it, it would have ap- peared in the Gazette! with the earliest intelligence. At other times watching from the observatory of some cliff or tree, to telegraph any new arrival; or waiting at evening on the hill-tops for the sky to fall, that I might catch something, though I never caught much, and that, manna-wise, would dissolve again in the sun. ECONOMY 49 For a long time I was reporter to a journal,! of no very wide circulation, whose editor has never yet seen fit to print the bulk of my contributions, and, as is too common with writers, I got only my labor for my pains. However, in this case my pains were their own reward. For many years I was self-appointed inspector of snow storms and rain storms, and did my duty faith- fully; surveyor, if not of highways, then of forest paths and all across-lot routes, keeping them open, and ra- vines bridged and passable at all seasons, where the public heel had testified to their utility. I have looked after the wild stock of the town, which give a faithful herdsman a good deal of trouble by leaping fences; and I have had an eye to the unfre- quented nooks and corners of the farm; though I did not always know whether Jonas or Solomon worked in a particular field to-day; that was none of my busi- ness. I have watered the red huckleberry, the sand cherry and the nettle tree, the red pine and the black ash, the white grape and the yellow violet, which might have withered else in dry seasons. In short, I went on thus for a long time, I may say it without boasting, faithfully minding my business, till it became more and more evident that my towns- men would not after all admit me into the list of town officers, nor make my place a sinecure with a moderate allowance. My accounts, which I can swear to have kept faithfully, I have, indeed, never got audited, still less accepted, still less paid and settled. However, I have not set my heart on that. 50 WALDEN Not long since, a strolling Indian went to sell bas- kets at the house of a well known lawyer in my neigh- borhood. ‘‘Do. you wish to buy any baskets?” he asked. ‘‘No, we do not want any,” was the reply. ‘‘What!’’ exclaimed the Indian as he went out the gate, “‘do you mean to starve us?’ Having seen his industrious white neighbors so well off—that the lawyer had only to weave arguments, and by some magic wealth and standing followed, he had said to himself: I will go into business; I will weave baskets; it is a thing which Ican do. Thinking that when he had made the baskets he would have done his part, and then it would be the white man’s to buy them. He had not discovered that it was necessary for him to make it worth the other’s while to buy them, or at least make him think that it was so, or to make something else which it would be worth his while to buy. I too had woven a kind of basket of a delicate texture, but I had not made it worth any one’s while to buy them. Yet not the less, in my case, did I think it worth my while to weave them, and instead of studying how to make it worth men’s while to buy my baskets I studied rather how to avoid the necessity of selling them. The life which men praise and regard as successful is but one kind. Why should we exaggerate any one kind at the expense of the others? Finding that my fellow-citizens were not likely to offer me any room in the court-house, or any curacy or living anywhere else, but I must shift for myself, I turned my face more exclusively than ever to the ECONOMY 51 woods, where I was better known. I determined to go into business at once, and not wait to acquire the usual capital, using such slender means as I had al- ready got. My purpose in going to Walden Pond was not to live cheaply nor to live dearly there, but to transact some private business with the fewest ob- stacles; to be hindered from accomplishing which for want of a little common sense, a little enterprise and business talent, appeared not so sad as foolish. I have always endeavored to acquire strict business habits; they are indispensable to every man. If your trade is with the Celestial Empire, then some small counting-house on the coast, in some Salem ! harbor, will be fixture enough. You will export such articles as the country affords, purely native products, much ice and pine timber and a little granite, always in native bottoms. These will be good ventures. To oversee all the details yourself in person; to be at once pilot and captain, and owner and underwriter; to buy and sell and keep the accounts; to read every letter received, and write or read every letter sent; to super- intend the discharge of imports night and day; to be upon many parts of the coast almost at the same time—often the richest freight will be discharged upon a Jersey shore; to be your own telegraph, unweariedly sweeping the horizon, speaking all passing vessels bound coastwise; to keep up a steady despatch of commodities, for the supply of such a distant and ex- orbitant market; to keep yourself informed of the state of the markets, prospects of war and peace every- 52 WALDEN where, and anticipate the tendencies of trade and clvilization—taking advantage of the results of all exploring expeditions, using new passages and all im- provements in navigation; charts to be studied, the position of reefs and new lights and buoys to be as- certained, and ever, and ever, the logarithmic tables to be corrected, for by the error of some calculator the vessel often splits upon a rock that should have reached a friendly pier—there is the untold fate of La Perouse; ! universal science to be kept pace with, studying the lives of all great discoverers and navigators, great ad- venturers and merchants, from Hanno? and the Pheenicians down to our day; in fine, account of stock to be taken from time to time, to know how you stand. It is a labor to task the faculties of a man—such problems of profit and loss, of interest, of tare and tret,® and gauging of all kinds in it, as demand a universal knowledge. I have thought that Walden Pond would be a good place for business, not solely on account of the railroad or the ice trade; it offers advantages which it may not be good policy to divulge; it is a good post and a good foundation. No Neva‘ marshes to be filled; though you must everywhere build on piles of your own driv- ing. It is said that a flood-tide, with a westerly wind, and ice in the Neva, would sweep St. Petersburg from the face of the earth. As this business was to be entered into without the usual capital, it may not be easy to conjecture where those means, that will still be indispensable to every ECONOMY 53 such undertaking, were to be obtained. As for Cloth- ing, to come at once to the practical part of the ques- tion, perhaps we are led oftener by the love of novelty, and a regard for the opinions of men, in procuring it, than by a true utility. Let him who has work to do recollect that the object of clothing is, first, to retain the vital heat, and secondly, in this state of society, to cover nakedness, and he may judge how much of any necessary or important work may be accomplished without adding to his wardrobe. Kings and queens who wear a suit but once, though made by some tailor or dressmaker to their majesties, cannot know the com- fort of wearing a suit that fits. They are no better than wooden horses to hang the clean clothes on. Every day our garments become more assimilated to - ourselves, receiving the impress of the wearer’s char- acter, until we hesitate to lay them aside, without such delay and medical appliances and some such solemnity even as our bodies. No man ever stood the lower in my estimation for having a patch in his clothes; yet I am sure that there is greater anxiety, commonly, to have fashionable, or at least, clean and unpatched clothes, than to have a sound conscience. But even if the rent is not mended, perhaps the worst vice betrayed is improvidence. I sometimes try my acquaintances by such tests as this: who could wear a patch, or two extra seams only, over the knee? Most behave as if they believed that their prospects for life would be ruined if they should do it. It would be easier for them to hobble down to town with a broken leg than with a 54 WALDEN broken pantaloon. Often if an accident happens to a gentlemen’s legs, they can be mended; but if a similar accident happens to the legs of his pantaloons, there is no help for it; for he considers, not what is truly re- spectable, but what is respected. We know but few men, a great many coats and breeches. Dress a scare- crow in your last shift, you standing shiftless by, who would not soonest salute the scare-crow? Passing a cornfield the other day, close by a hat and coat on a stake, I recognized the owner of the farm. He was only a little more weather-beaten than when I saw him last. I have heard of a dog that barked at every stranger who approached his master’s premises with clothes on, but was easily quieted by a naked thief. It is an in- teresting question how far men would retain their rela- tive rank if they were divested of their clothes. Could you, in such a case, tell surely of any company of civi- lized men, which belonged to the most respected class? When Madam Pfeiffer,! in her adventurous travels round the world, from east to west, had got so near home as Asiatic Russia, she says that she felt the ne- cessity of wearing other than a travelling dress, when she went to meet the authorities, for she “‘ was now in a civilized country, where ———— people are judged of by their clothes.”” Even in our democratic New Eng- land towns, the accidental possession of wealth, and its manifestation in dress and equipage alone, obtain for the possessor almost universal respect. But they who yield such respect, numerous as they are, are so far heathen, and need to have a missionary sent to ECONOMY 55 them. Besides, clothes introduced sewing, a kind of work which you may call endless; a woman’s dress, at least, is never done. A man who has at length found something to do will not need to get a new suit to do it in; for him the old will do, that has lain dusty in the garret for an indeterminate period. Old shoes will serve a hero longer than they have served his valet—if a hero ever has a valet—bare feet are older than shoes, and he can make them do. Only they who go to soirées and legislative halls must have new coats, coats to change as often as the man changes in them. But if my jacket and trousers, my hat and shoes, are fit to wor- ship God in, they will do; will they not? Who ever saw his old clothes—his old coat—actually worn out, resolved into its primitive elements, so that it was not a deed of charity to bestow it on some poor boy, by him perchance to be bestowed on some poorer still, or shall we say richer, who could do with less? I say, beware of all enterprises that require new clothes, and not rather a new wearer of clothes. If there is not a new man, how can the new clothes be made to fit? If you have any enterprise before you, try it in your old clothes. All men want, not something to do with, but something to do, or rather, something to be. Per- haps we should never procure a new suit, however ragged or dirty the old, until we have so conducted, so enterprised or sailed in some way, that we feel like new men in the old, and that to retain it would be like keeping new wine in old bottles. Our moulting season, 56 WALDEN like that of the fowls, must be a erisis in our lives. The loon retires to solitary ponds to spend it. Thus also the snake casts its slough, and the caterpillar its wormy coat, by an internal industry and expansion; for clothes are but our outmost cuticle and mortal coil. Otherwise we shall be found sailing under false colors, and be inevitably cashiered at last by our own opinion, as well as that of mankind. We don garment after garment, as if we grew like exogenous plants by addition without. Our outside and often thin and fanciful clothes are our epidermis or false skin, which partakes not of our life, and may be stripped off here and there without fatal injury; our thicker garments, constantly worn, are our cellular integument, or cortex; but our shirts are our liber or true bark, which cannot be removed without girdling and so destroying the man. I believe that all races at some seasons wear something equivalent to the shirt. It is desirable that a man be clad so simply that he can lay his hands on himself in the dark, and that he live in all respects so compactly and preparedly that, if an enemy take the town, he can, like the old philoso- pher, walk out the gate empty-handed without anxiety. While one thick garment is, for most purposes, as good as three thin ones, and cheap clothing can be obtained at prices really to suit customers; while a thick coat can be bought for five dollars, which will last as many years, thick pantaloons for two dollars, cowhide boots for a dollar and a half a pair, a summer hat for a quar- ter of a dollar, and a winter cap for sixty-two and a ECONOMY 57 half cents, or a better be made at home at a nominal cost, where is he so poor that, clad in such a suit, of his own earning, there will not be found wise men to do him reverence? When I ask for a garment of a particular form, my tailoress tells me gravely, ‘‘They do not make them so now,” not emphasizing the “They” at all, as if she quoted an authority as impersonal as the fates, and I find it difficult to get made what I want, simply be- cause she cannot believe that I mean what I say, that Iamsorash. When I hear this oracular sentence, Tam for a moment absorbed in thought, emphasizing to my- self each word separately that I may come at the mean- ing of it, that I may find out by what degree of con- sanguinity They are related to me, and what authority they may have in an affair which affects me so nearly; and, finally, I am inclined to answer her with equal mystery, and without any more emphasis of the “they:” “It is true, they did not make them so re- cently, but they do now.’’ Of what use this measuring of me if she does not measure my character, but only the breadth of my shoulders, as it were a peg to hang the coat on? We worship not the Graces,’ nor the Pares,? but Fashion. She spins and weaves and cuts with full authority. ‘The head monkey at Paris puts on a traveller’s cap, and all the monkeys in America do the same. I sometimes despair of getting anything quite simple and honest done in this world by the help of men. They would have to be passed through a power- ful press first, to squeeze their old notions out of them, 58 WALDEN so that they would not soon get upon their legs again, and then there would be some one in the company with a maggot in his head, hatched from an egg de- posited there nobody knows when, for not even fire kills these things, and you would have lost your labor. Nevertheless, we will not forget that some Egyptian wheat was handed down to us by a mummy. On the whole, I think that it cannot be maintained that dressing has in this or any country risen to the dignity of an art. At present men make shift to wear what they can get. Like shipwrecked sailors, they put on what they can find on the beach, and at a little distance, whether of space or time, laugh at each other’s masquerade. Every generation laughs at the old fashions, but follows religiously the new. We are amused at beholding the costume of Henry VIII, or Queen Elizabeth, as much as if it was that of the King and Queen of the Cannibal Islands. All costume off a man is pitiful or grotesque. It is only the serious eye peering from and the sincere life passed within it, which restrain laughter and consecrate the costume of any people. Let Harlequin ! be taken with a fit of the colic and his trappings will have to serve that mood too. When the soldier is hit by a cannon ball, rags are as becoming as purple. The childish and savage taste of men and women for new patterns keeps how many shaking and squint- ing through kaleidoscopes that they may discover the particular figure which this generation requires to-day. The manufacturers have learned that this ECONOMY 59 taste is merely whimsical. Of two patterns which differ only by a few threads more or less of a particu- lar color, the one will be sold readily, the other lie on the shelf, though it frequently happens that after the lapse of a season the latter becomes the most fashion- able. Comparatively, tattooing is not the hideous cus- tom which it is called. It is not barbarous merely because the printing is skin-deep and unalterable. I cannot believe that our factory system is the best mode by which men may get clothing. The condi- tion of the operatives is becoming every day more like that of the English; and it cannot be wondered at, since, as far as I have heard or observed, the principal object is, not that mankind may be well and honestly clad, but, unquestionably, that the corporations may be enriched. In the long run, men hit only what they aim at. Therefore, though they should fail immedi- ately, they had better aim at something high. As for a Shelter, I will not deny that this is now a necessary of life, though there are instances of men having done without it for long periods in colder coun- tries than this. Samuel Laing! says that “The Lap- lander in his skin dress, and in a skin bag which he puts over his head and shoulders, will sleep night after night on the snow—in a degree of cold which would extin- guish the life of one exposed to it in any woollen cloth- ing.”’ He had seen them asleep thus. Yet he adds, “They are not hardier than other people.” But, . probably, man did not live long on the earth without 60 WALDEN discovering the convenience which there is in a house, | the domestic comforts, which phrase may have origi- — nally signified the satisfactions of the house more than | of the family; though these must be extremely partial and occasional in those climates where the house is associated in our thoughts with winter or the rainy season chiefly, and two-thirds of the year, except for a parasol, is unnecessary. In our climate, in the summer, it was formerly almost solely a covering at night. In the Indian gazettes a wigwam was the symbol of a day’s march, and a row of them cut or painted on the bark of a tree signified that so many times they had camped. Man was not made so large limbed and ro- bust but that he must seek to narrow his world, and wall in a space such as fitted him. He was at first bare and out of doors; but though this was pleasant enough in serene and warm weather, by daylight, the rainy season and the winter, to say nothing of the torrid sun, would perhaps have nipped his race in the bud if he had not made haste to clothe himself with the shelter of a house. Adam and Eve, according to the fable, wore the bower before other clothes. Man wanted a home, a place of warmth, or comfort, first of physical warmth, then the warmth of the affections. We may imagine a time when, in the infancy of the human race, some enterprising mortal crept into a hollow in a rock for shelter. Every child begins the world again, to some extent, and loves to stay out- doors, even in wet and cold. It plays house, as well as horse, having an instinct for it. Who does not re- ECONOMY 61 member the interest with which, when young, he looked at shelving rocks, or any approach to a cave? It was the natural yearning of that portion of our most primitive ancestor which still survived in us. From the cave we have advanced to roofs of palm leaves, of bark and boughs, of linen woven and stretched, of grass and straw, of buards and shingles, of stones and tiles. At last, we know not what it is to live in the open air, and our lives are domestic in more senses than we think. From the hearth to the field is a great distance. It would be well, perhaps, if we were to spend more of our days and nights without any obstruction between us and the celestial bodies, if the poet did not speak so much from under a roof, or the saint dwell there so long. Birds do not sing in caves, nor do doves cherish their innocence in dovecots. However, if one designs to construct a dwelling house, it behooves him to exercise a little Yankee shrewdness, lest after all he find himself in a work- house, a labyrinth without a clew, a museum, an alms- house, a prison, or a splendid mausoleum instead. Consider first how slight a shelter is absolutely neces- sary. I have seen Penobscot Indians, in this town, liv- ing in tents of thin cotton cloth, while the snow was nearly a foot deep around them, and I thought that they would be glad to have it deeper to keep out the wind. Formerly, when how to get my living honestly, with freedom left for my proper pursuits, was a ques- tion which vexed me even more than it does now, for unfortunately I am become somewhat callous, I used 62 WALDEN to see a large box by the railroad, six feet long by three wide, in which the laborers locked up their tools at night, and it suggested to me that every man who was hard pushed might get such a one for a doliar, and having bored a few auger holes in it, to admit the air at least, get into it when it rained and at night, and hook down the lid, and so have free- dom in his love, and in his soul be free. This did not appear the worst, nor by any means a despicable alternative. You could sit up as late as you pleased, and, whenever you got up, go abroad without any landlord or houselord dogging you for rent. Many a man is harassed to death to pay the rent of a larger and more luxurious box who would not have frozen to death in such a box as this. I am far from jesting. Economy is a subject which admits of being treated with levity, but it cannot so be disposed of. A com- fortable house for a rude and hardy race, that lived mostly out of doors, was once made here almost en- tirely of such materials as Nature furnished ready to their hands. Gookin, who was superintendent of the Indians subject to the Massachusetts Colony, writing in 1674, says, ‘‘The best of their houses are covered very neatly, tight and warm, with barks of trees, slipped from their bodies at those seasons when the sap is up, and made into great flakes, with pressure of weighty timber, when they are green. ... The meaner sort are covered with mats which they make of a kind of bulrush, and are also indifferently tight and warm, but not so good as the former. . . . Some I Se ee ECONOMY 63 have seen, sixty or a hundred feet long and thirty feet broad. . . . I have often lodged in their wigwams, and found them as warm as the best English houses.’”’ He adds, that they were commonly carpeted and lined within with well-wrought embroidered mats, and were furnished with various utensils. The Indians had ad-_ vanced so far as to regulate the effect of the wind by a mat suspended over the hole in the roof and moved by a string. Such a lodge was in the first instance constructed in a day or two at most, and taken down and put up in a few hours; and every family owned one, or its apartment in one. In the savage state every family owns a shelter as good as the best, and sufficient for its coarser and simpler wants; but I think that I speak within bounds when I say that, though the birds of the air have their nests, and the foxes their holes, and the savages their wigwams, in modern civilized society not more than one-half the families own a shelter. In the large towns and cities, where civilization especially prevails, the number of those who own a shelter is a very small fraction of the whole. The rest pay an annual tax for this outside garment of all, become indispensable summer and winter, which would buy a village of Indian wigwams, but now helps to keep them poor as long as they live. I do not mean to insist here on the disadvantage of hiring compared with owning, but it is evident that the savage owns his shelter because it costs so little, while the civilized man hires his com- monly because he cannot afford to own it; nor can he, 64 WALDEN in the long run, any better afford to hire. But, answers one, by merely paying this tax the poor civilized man secures an abode which is a palace compared with the savage’s. An annual rent of from twenty-five to a hundred dollars, these are the country rates, entitles him to the benefit of the improvements of centuries, spacious apartments, clean paint and paper, Rumford fireplace, back plastering, Venetian blinds, copper pump, spring lock, a commodious cellar, and many other things. But how happens it that he who is said to enjoy these things is so commonly a poor civilized man, while the savage, who has them not, is rich as a savage? If it is asserted that civilization is a real ad- vance in the condition of man—and I think that it 1s, though only the wise improve their advantages—it must be shown that it has produced better dwellings without making them more costly; and the cost of a thing is the amount of what I will call life which is re- quired to be exchanged for it, immediately or in the long run. An average house in this neighborhood costs perhaps eight hundred dollars, and to lay up this sum will take from ten to fifteen years of the laborer’s life, even if he is not encumbered with a family—estimat- ing the pecuniary value of every man’s labor at one dollar a day, for if some receive more, others receive less—so that he must have spent more than half his life commonly before his wigwam will beearned. If we suppose him to pay a rent instead, this is but a doubt- ful choice of evils. Would the savage have been wise to exchange his wigwam for a palace on these terms? ECONOMY | 65 It may be guessed that I reduce almost the whole advantage of holding this superfluous property as a fund in store against the future, so far as the indi- vidual is concerned, mainly to the defraying of funeral expenses. But perhaps a man is not required to bury himself. Nevertheless this points to: an important distinction between the civilized man and the savage; and, no doubt, they have designs on us for our benefit, in making the life of a civilized people an institution, in which the life of the individual is to a great extent absorbed, in order to preserve and perfect that of the race. But I wish to show at what a sacrifice this ad- vantage is at present obtained, and to suggest that we may possibly so live as to secure all the advantage without suffering any of the disadvantage. What mean - ye by saying that the poor ye have always with you, or that the fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the chil- dren’s teeth are set on edge? “As I live, saith the Lord God, ye shall not have occasion any more to use this proverb in Is- rael.’’ } “Behold all souls are mine; as the soul of the father, so also the soul of the son is mine; the soul that sinneth it shall die.” When I consider my neighbors, the farmers of Con- cord, who are at least as well off as the other classes, I find that for the most part they have been toiling twenty, thirty, or forty years, that they may become _the real owners of their farms, which commonly they have inherited with encumbrances, or else bought with 66 WALDEN hired money,—and we may regard one-third of that toil as the cost of their houses,—but commonly they have not paid for them yet. It is true, the encum- brances sometimes outweigh the value of the farm, so that the farm itself becomes one great encumbrance, and still a man is found to inherit it, being well ac- quainted with it, as he says. On applying to the as- sessors, I am surprised to learn that they cannot at once name a dozen in the town who own their farms free and clear. If you would know the history of these homesteads, inquire at the bank where they are mortgaged. The man who has actually paid for his farm with labor on it is so rare that every neighbor can point to him. I doubt if there are three such men in Concord. What has been said of the merchants, that a very large majority, even ninety-seven in a hundred, are sure to fail, is equally true of the farmers. With regard to the merchants, however, one of them says pertinently that a great part of their failures are not genuine pecuniary failures, but merely failures to ful- fil their engagements, because it is inconvenient; that is, it is the moral character that breaks down. But this puts an infinitely worse face on the matter, and suggests, beside, that probably not even the other three succeed in saving their souls, but are perchance bankrupt in a worse sense than they who fail honestly. Bankruptcy and repudiation are the spring-boards from which much of our civilization vaults and turns its somersaults, but the savage stands on the unelastic plank of famine. Yet the Middlesex Cattle Show goes SCONOMY 67 off here with éclat annually, as if all the joints of the agricultural machine were suent. The farmer is endeavoring to solve the problem of a livelihood by a formula more complicated than the problem itself. To get his shoestrings he specu- lates in herds of cattle. With consummate skill he has set his trap with a hair spring to catch comfort and independence, and then, as he turned away, got his own leg into it. This is the reason he is poor; and for a similar reason we are all poor in respect to a thousand savage comforts, though surrounded by luxuries. As Chapman ! sings,— “The false society of men— —for earthly greatness All heavenly comforts rarefies to air.”’ And when the farmer has got his house, he may not be the richer but the poorer for it, and it be the house that has got him. As I understand it, that was a valid objection urged by Momus? against the house which Minerva*® made, that she “had not made it movable, by which means a bad neighborhood might be avoided;”’ and it may still be urged, for our houses are such unwieldy property that we are often im- prisoned rather than housed in them; and the bad neighborhood to be avoided is our own scurvy selves. I know one or two families, at least, in this town, who, for nearly a generation, have been wishing to sell their houses in the outskirts and move into the village, but have not been able to accomplish it, and only death will set them free. 68 WALDEN Granted that the majority are able at last either to own or hire the modern house with all its improve- ments. While civilization has been improving our houses, it has not equally improved the men who are to inhabit them. It has created palaces, but it was not so easy to create noblemen and kings. And 7 the civilized man’s pursuits are no worthier than the savage’s, if he is employed the greater part of his life in obtaining gross necessaries and comforts merely, why should he have a better dwelling than the former? But how do the poor minority fare? Perhaps it will be found, that just in proportion as some have been placed in outward circumstances above the savage, others have been degraded below him. The luxury of one class is counterbalanced by the indigence of an- other. On the one side is the palace, on the other are the almshouse and ‘‘silent poor.’”’ The myriads who built the pyramids to be the tombs of the Pharaohs were fed on garlic, and it may be were not decently buried themselves. The mason who finishes the cor- nice of the palace returns at night perchance to a hut not so good as a wigwam. It is a mistake to suppose that, in a country where the usual evidences of civiliza- tion exist, the condition of a very large body of the inhabitants may not be as degraded as that of savages. I refer to the degraded poor, not now to the degraded rich. To know this I should not need to look farther than the shanties which everywhere border our rail- roads, that last improvement in civilization; where I see in my daily walks human beings living in sties, and ECONOMY 69 all winter with an open door, for the sake of light, with- out any visible, often imaginable, wood pile, and the forms of both old and young are permanently con- tracted by the long habit of shrinking from cold and misery, and the development of all their limbs and faculties is checked. It certainly is fair to look at that class by whose labor the works which distinguish this generation are accomplished. Such too, to a greater or less extent, is the condition of the opera- tives of every denomination in England, which is the great workhouse of the world. Or I could refer you _ to Ireland, which is marked as one of the white or en- lightened spots on the map. Contrast the physical condition of the Irish with that of the North American Indian, or the South Sea Islander, or any other savage race before it was degraded by contact with the civi- lized man. Yet I have no doubt that that people’s rulers are as wise as the average of civilized rulers. Their condition only proves what squalidness may consist with civilization. I hardly need refer now to the laborers in our Southern States who produce the staple exports of this country, and are themselves a staple production of the South. But to confine my- self to those who are said to be in moderate circum- stances. Most men appear never to have considered what a house is, and are actually though needlessly poor all their lives because they think that they must have such a one as their neighbors have. As if one were to wear any sort of coat which the tailor might cut out 70 WALDEN for him, or, gradually leaving off palmleaf hat or cap of woodchuck skin, complain of hard times because he could not afford to buy him a crown! It is possible to invent a house still more convenient and luxurious than we have, which yet all would admit that man could not afford to pay for. Shall we always study to obtain more of these things, and not sometimes to be content with less? Shall the respectable citizen thus gravely teach, by precept and example, the necessity of the young man’s providing a certain number of superfluous glow-shoes, and umbrellas, and empty guest chambers for empty guests, before he dies? Why should not our furniture be as simple as the Arab’s or the Indian’s? When I think of the benefactors of the race, whom we have apotheosized as messengers from heaven, bearers of divine gifts to man, I do not see in my mind any retinue at their heels, any car- load of fashionable furniture. Or what if I were to allow—would it not be a singular allowance?—that our furniture should be more complex than the Arab’s, in proportion as we are morally and intellectually his superiors! At present our houses are cluttered and defiled with it, and a good housewife would sweep out the greater part into the dust hole, and not leave her morning’s work undone. Morning work! By the blushes of Aurora! and the music of Memnon,? what should be man’s morning work in this world? I had three pieces of limestone on my desk, but I was terrified to find that they required to be dusted daily, when the furniture of my mind was all undusted still, and I ECONOMY ra threw them out the window in disgust. How, then, could I have a furnished house? I would rather sit in the open air, for no dust gathers on the grass, unless where man has broken ground. It is the luxurious and dissipated who set the fashions which the herd so diligently follow. The traveller who stops at the best houses, so called, soon discovers this, for the publicans presume him to be a Sardanapalus,! and if he resigned himself to their tender mercies he would soon be completely emasculated. I think that in the railroad car we are inclined to spend more on luxury than on safety and convenience, and it threatens without attaining these to become no better than a modern drawing-room, with its divans, and ottomans, and sunshades, and a hundred other Oriental things, _which we are taking west with us, invented for the ladies of the harem and the effeminate natives of the Celestial Empire, which Jonathan should be ashamed to know the names of. I would rather sit on a pump- kin and have it all to myself, than be crowded on a velvet cushion. I would rather ride on earth in an ox cart with a free circulation, than go to heaven in the fancy car of an excursion train and breathe a malaria all the way. The very simplicity and nakedness of man’s life in the primitive ages imply this advantage at least, that they left him still but a sojourner in nature. When he was refreshed with food and sleep he contemplated his journey again. He dwelt, as it were, in a tent in this world, and was either threading the valleys, or 72 WALDEN crossing the plains, or climbing the mountain tops. But lo! men have become the tools of their tools. The man who independently plucked the fruits when he was hungry is become a farmer; and he who stood under a tree for shelter, a housekeeper. We now no longer camp as for a night, but have settled down on earth and forgotten heaven. We have adopted Chris- tianity merely as an improved method of agriculture. We have built for this world a family mansion, and for the next a family tomb. The best works of art are the expression of man’s struggle to free himself from this condition, but the effect of our art is merely to make this low state comfortable and that higher state to be forgotten. There is actually no place in this village for a work of fine art, if any had come down to us, to stand, for our lives, our houses and streets, furnish no proper pedestal for it. There is not a nail to hang a picture on, nor a shelf to receive the bust of a hero or a saint. When I consider how our houses are built and paid for, or not paid for, and their internal economy managed and sustained, I wonder that the floor does not give way under the visitor while he is admiring the gewgaws upon the mantel-piece, and let him through into the cellar, to some solid and honest though earthly foundation. I cannot but perceive that this so-called rich and refined life is a thing jumped at, and I do not get on in the enjoyment of the fine arts which adorn it, my attention being wholly occupied with the jump; for I remember that the greatest genuine leap, due to human muscles alone, on record, ECONOMY 73 is that of certain wandering Arabs, who are said to have cleared twenty-five feet on level ground. With- out factitious support, man is sure to come to earth again beyond that distance. The first question which I am tempted to put to the proprietor of such great impropriety is, Who bolsters you? Are you one of the ninety-seven who fail, or the three who succeed? Answer me these questions, and then perhaps I may look at your bawbles and find them ornamental. The cart before the horse is neither beautiful nor useful. Before we can adorn our houses with beautiful objects the walls must be stripped, and our lives must be stripped, and housekeeping and beautiful living be laid for a foundation: now, a taste for the beautiful is most cultivated out of doors, where there is no house and no housekeeper. Old Johnson, in his Wonder-Working Providence, speaking of the first settlers of this town, with whom he was contemporary, tells us that ‘“‘they burrow themselves in the earth for their first shelter under some hillside, and, casting the soil aloft upon timber, they make a smoky fire against the earth, at the highest side.’”” They did not “provide them houses,”’ says he, “till the earth, by the Lord’s blessing, brought forth bread to feed them,” and the first year’s crop was so light that ‘‘they were forced to cut their bread very thin for a long season.’ The secretary of the Province of New Netherland, writing in Dutch, in 1650, for the information of those who wished to take up land there, states more particularly, that ‘‘those - 74 WALDEN in New Netherland, and especially in New England, who have no means to build farm houses at first ac- cording to their wishes, dig a square pit in the ground, cellar fashion, six or seven feet deep, as long and as broad as they think proper, case the earth inside with wood all round the wall, and line the wood with the bark of trees or something else to prevent the caving in of the earth; floor this cellar with plank, and wainscot it overhead for a ceiling, raise a roof of spars clear up, and cover the spars with bark or green sods, so that they can live dry and warm in these houses with their entire families for two, three, and four years, it being understood that partitions are run through those cellars which are adapted to the size of the family. The wealthy and principal men in New England, in the be- ginning of the colonies, commenced their first dwelling houses in this fashion for two reasons; firstly, in order not to waste time in building, and not to want food the next season; secondly, in order not to discourage poor laboring people whom they brought over in numbers from Fatherland. In the course of three or four years, when the country became adapted to agriculture, they built themselves handsome houses, spending on them several thousands.”’ In this course which our ancestors took there was a show of prudence at least, as if their principle were to satisfy the more pressing wants first. But are the more pressing wants satisfied now? When I think of acquiring for myself one of our luxurious dwellings, I am deterred, for, so to speak, the country is not yet ECONOMY 75 adapted to human culture, and we are still forced to cut our spiritual bread far thinner than our forefathers did their wheaten. Not that all architectural ornament is to be neglected even in the rudest periods; but let our houses first be lined with beauty, where they come in contact: with our lives, like the tenement of the shell- fish, and not overlaid with it. But, alas! I have been inside one or two of them, and know what they are lined with. Though we are not so degenerate but that we might possibly livein a cave or a wigwam or wear skins to- day, it certainly is better to accept the advantages, though so dearly bought, which the invention and in- dustry of mankind offer. In such a neighborhood as this, boards and shingles, lime and bricks, are cheaper and more easily obtained than suitable caves, or whole logs, or bark in sufficient quantities, or even well- tempered clay or flat stones. I speak understandingly on this subject, for I have made myself acquainted with it both theoretically and practically. With a little more wit we might use these materials so as to become richer than the richest now are, and make our civilization a blessing. The civilized man is a more experienced and wiser savage. But to make haste to my own experiment. Near the end of March, 1845, I borrowed an axe ! and went down to the woods by Walden Pond, nearest to where I intended to build my house, and began to cut down some tall arrowy white pines, still in their youth, for timber. It is difficult to begin without borrowing, 76 WALDEN but perhaps it is the most generous course thus to per- mit your fellow-men to have an interest in your enter- prise. The owner of the axe, as he released his hold on it, said that it was the apple of his eye; but I returned it sharper than I received it. It was a pleasant hillside where I worked, covered with pine woods, through which I looked out on the pond, and a small open field in the woods where pines and hickories were springing up. The ice in the pond was not yet dissolved, though there were some open spaces, and it was all dark colored and saturated with water. There were some slight © flurries of snow during the days that I worked there; but for the most part when I came out on to the rail- road, on my way home, its yellow sand heap stretched away gleaming in the hazy atmosphere, and the rails shone in the spring sun, and I heard the lark and pewee and other birds already come to commence another year with us. They were pleasant spring days, in which the winter of man’s discontent! was thawing as well as the earth, and the life that had lain torpid began to stretch itself. One day, when my axe had come off and I had cut a green hickory for a wedge, driving it with a stone, and had placed the whole to soak in a pond hole in order to swell the wood, I saw a striped snake run into the water, and he lay on the bottom, apparently without inconvenience, as long as I staid there, or more than a quarter of an hour; perhaps because he had not fairly come out of the torpid state. It ap- peared to me that for a like reason men remain in their present low and primitive condition; but if they should ECONOMY Th feel the influence of the spring of springs arousing them, they would of necessity rise to a higher and more ethe- real life. I had previously seen the snakes in frosty mornings in my path with portions of their bodies still numb and inflexible, waiting for the sun to thaw them. On the Ist of April it rained and meited the ice, and in the early part of the day, which was very foggy, I heard astray goose groping about over the pond and cackling as if lost, or like the spirit of the fog. So I went on for some days cutting and hewing timber, and also studs and rafters, all with my narrow axe, not having many communicable or scholar-like thoughts, singing to myself ,— Men say they know many things, But lo! they have taken wings— The arts and sciences, And a thousand appliances; The wind that blows Is all that any body knows. I hewed the main timbers six inches square, most of the studs on two sides only, and the rafters and floor timbers on one side, leaving the rest of the bark on, so that they were just as straight and much stronger than sawed ones. LHach stick was carefully mortised or tenoned by its stump, for I had borrowed other tools by this time. My days in the woods were not very long ones; yet I usually carried my dinner of bread and butter, and read the newspaper in which it was wrapped, at noon, sitting amid the green pine boughs which I had cut off, and to my bread was im- 78 WALDEN parted some of their fragrance, for my hands were covered with a thick coat of pitch. Before I had done I was more the friend than the foe of the pine tree, though I had cut down some of them, having become better acquainted with it.1 Sometimes a rambler in the wood was attracted by the sound of my axe, and we chatted pleasantly over the chips which I had made. By the middle of April, for I made no haste in my work, but rather made the most of it, my house was framed and ready for the raising. I had already bought the shanty of James Collins, an Irishman who worked on the Fitchburg Railroad, for boards. James Collins’ shanty was considered an uncommonly fine one. When I called to see it he was not at home. I walked about the outside, at first unobserved from within, the window was so deep and high. It was of small dimensions, with a peaked cottage roof, and not much else to be seen, the dirt being raised five feet all around as if it were a compost heap. The roof was the soundest part, though a good deal warped and made brittle by the sun. Doorsill there was none, but a perennial passage for the hens under the door board. Mrs. C. came to the door and asked me to view it from the inside. The hens were driven in by my approach. It was dark, and had a dirt floor for the most part, dank, clammy, and aguish, only here a board and there a board which would not bear removal. She lighted a lamp to show me the inside of the roof and the walls, and also that the board floor extended under the bed, warning me not to step into the cellar, a sort of dust ECONOMY 79 hole two feet deep. In her own words, they were ‘“‘go0d boards overhead, good boards all around, and a good window,’’—of two whole squares originally, only the cat had passed out that way lately. There was a stove, a bed, and a place to sit, an infant in the house where it was born, a silk parasol, gilt-framed looking- glass, and a patent new coffee-mill nailed to an oak sapling, all told. The bargain was soon concluded, for James had in the meanwhile returned. I to pay four dollars and twenty-five cents to-night, he to vacate at five to-morrow morning, selling to nobody else meanwhile: I to take possession at six. It were well, he said, to be there early, and anticipate certain in- distinct but wholly unjust claims on the score of ground rent and fuel. This he assured me was the only encum- brance. At six I passed him and his family on the road. One large bundle held their all,—bed, coffee- mill, looking-glass, hens,—all but the cat, she took to the woods and became a wild cat, and, as I learned afterward, trod in a trap set for woodchucks, and so became a dead cat at last. I took down this dwelling the same morning, draw- ing the nails, and removed it to the pond side by small cart-loads, spreading the boards on the grass there to bleach and warp back again in the sun. One early thrush gave me a note or two as I drove along the wood- land path. I was informed treacherously by a young Patrick that neighbor Seeley, an Irishman, in the in- tervals of the carting, transferred the still tolerable, straight, and drivable nails, staples, and spikes to his 80 WALDEN pocket, and then stood when I came back to pass the time of day, and look freshly up, unconcerned, with spring thoughts, at the devastation; there being a dearth of work, as he said. He was there to represent spectatordom, and help make this seemingly insignifi- cant event one with the removal of the gods of Troy. I dug my cellar in the side of a hill sloping. to the south, where a woodchuck had formerly dug his bur- row, down through sumach and blackberry roots, and the lowest stain of vegetation, six feet square by seven deep, to a fine sand where potatoes would not freeze in any winter. The sides were left shelving, and not stoned; but the sun having never shone on them, the sand still keeps its place. It was but two hours’ work. I took particular pleasure in this breaking of ground, for in almost all latitudes men dig into the earth for an equable temperature. Under the most splendid house in the city is still to be found the cellar where they store their roots as of old, and long after the su- perstructure has disappeared posterity remark its dent in the earth. The house is still but a sort of porch at the entrance of a burrow. At length, in the beginning of May, with the help of some of my acquaintances, rather to improve so good an occasion for neighborliness than from any necessity, I set up the frame of my house. No man was ever more honored in the character of his raisers 2 than I. They are destined, I trust, to assist at the’ raising of loftier structures one day. I began to occupy my house on the 4th of July, as soon as it was boarded ECONOMY 81 and roofed, for the boards were carefully feather-edged and lapped, so that it was perfectly impervious to rain; but before boarding, I laid the foundation of a chimney at one end, bringing two cart-loads of stones up the hill from the pond in my arms. I built the chimney after my hoeing in the fall, before a fire be- came necessary for warmth, doing my cooking in the meanwhile out of doors on the ground, early in the morning: which mode I still think is in some respects more convenient and agreeable than the usual one. When it stormed before my bread was baked, I fixed a few boards over the fire, and sat under them to watch my loaf, and passed some pleasant hours in that way. In those days, when my hands were much em- ployed, I read but little, but the least scraps of paper which lay on the ground, my holder, or tablecloth, afforded me as much entertainment, in fact, answered the same purpose as the Iliad.} It would be worth the while to build still more deliberately than I did, considering, for instance, what foundation a door, a window, a cellar, a garret, have in the nature of man, and perchance never raising any superstructure until we have found a better reason for it than our temporal necessities even. There is some of the same fitness in a man’s building his own house that there is in a bird’s building its own nest. Who knows but if men constructed their dwellings with their own hands, and provided food for themselves and families simply and honestly enough, the poetic 82 WALDEN faculty would be universally developed, as birds uni- versally sing when they are so engaged? But alas! we do like cowbirds and cuckoos, which lay their eggs in nests which other birds have built, and cheer no traveler with their chattering and unmusical notes. Shall we forever resign the pleasure of construction to the carpenter? What does architecture amount to in the experience of the mass of men? I never in all my walks came across a man engaged in so simple and natural an occupation as building his house. We be- long to the community. It is not the tailor alone who is the ninth part of a man; it is as much the preacher, and the merchant, and the farmer. Where is this di- vision of labor to end? and what object does it finally serve? No doubt another may also think for me; but it is not therefore desirable that he should do so to the exclusion of my thinking for myself. True, there are architects so called in this country, and I have heard of one at least possessed with the idea of making architectural ornaments have a core of ‘ truth, a necessity, and hence a beauty, as if it were a revelation to him. All very well perhaps from his point of view, but only a little better than the common dilettantism. A sentimental reformer in architecture, he began at the cornice, not at the foundation. It was only how to put a core of truth within the ornaments, that every sugar plum in fact might have an almond or caraway seed in it,—though I hold that almonds are most wholesome without the sugar,—and not how the inhabitant, the indweller, might build truly within ECONOMY 83 and without, and let the ornaments take care of them- selves. What reasonable man ever supposed that ornaments were something outward and in the skin merely,—that the tortoise got his spotted shell, or the shellfish its mother-o’-pearl tints, by such a contract as the inhabitants of Broadway their Trinity Church? But a man has no more to do with the style of architec- ture of his house than tortoise with that of its shell: nor need the soldier be so idle as to try to paint the precise color of his virtue on his standard. The enemy will find it out. He may turn pale when the trial comes. This man seemed to me to lean over the cornice, and timidly whisper his half truth to the rude occupants, who really knew it better than he. What of architec- tural beauty I now see, I know has gradually grown from within outward,! out of the necessities and char- acter of the indweller, who is the only builder,—out of some unconscious truthfulness, and nobleness, with- out ever a thought for the appearance; and whatever additional beauty of this kind is destined to be pro- duced will be preceded by a like unconscious beauty of life. The most interesting dwellings in this country, as the painter knows, are the most unpretending, humble log huts and cottages of the poor commonly; it is the life of the inhabitants whose shells they are, and not any peculiarity in their surfaces merely, which makes them picturesque; and equally interest- ing will be the citizen’s suburban box, when his life shall be as simple and as agreeable to the imagination, and there is as little straining after effect in the style 84 WALDEN of his dwelling. A great proportion of architectural ornaments are literally hollow, and a September gale would strip them off, like borrowed plumes, without injury to the substantials. They can do without archi- tecture who have no olives nor wines in the cellar. What if an equal ado were made about the ornaments of style in literature, and the architects of our Bibles spent as much time about their cornices as the archi- tects of our churches do? So are made the belles- lettres and the beauz-arts and their professors. Much it concerns a man, forsooth, how a few sticks are slanted over him or under him, and what colors are daubed upon his box. It would signify somewhat, if, in any earnest sense, he slanted them and daubed it; but the spirit having departed out of the tenant, it is of a piece with constructing his own coffin—the architec- ture of the grave, and “‘carpenter”’ is but another name for “‘coffin-maker.’’ One man says, in his despair or indifference to life, take up a handful of the earth at your feet, and paint your house that color. Is he thinking of his last and narrow house? Toss up a copper for it as well. What an abundance of leisure he must have! Why do you take up a handful of dirt? Better paint your house your own complexion; let it turn pale or blush for you. An enterprise to improve the style of cottage architecture! When you have got my ornaments ready I will wear them. Before winter, I built a chimney, and shingled the sides of my house, which were already impervious to rain, with imperfect and sappy shingles made of the ECONOMY 85 first slice of the log, whose edges I was obliged to straighten with a plane. I have thus a tight shingled and plastered house, ten feet wide by fifteen long, and eight-feet posts, with a garret and a closet, a large window on each side, two trap doors, one door at the end, and a brick fire- place opposite. The exact cost of my house, paying the usual price for such materials as I used, but not counting the work, all of which was done by myself, was as follows; and I give the details because very few are able to tell exactly what their houses cost, and fewer still, if any, the separate cost of the various materials which compose them :— Dears, . =. . . . . . . . $8 034%, mostly shanty boards: Refuse shingles for roof and sides, 4 00 Tagnsat ia)! 1. 25 Two econ Hand ahidows with PrSe sc. 2 43 One thousand old inci 4 00 Two casks of lime, 240 That was high. Hair, 0 31 More than I needed. Mantle-tree iron, 0 15 Nails, . 2 3 90 Hinges and screws, 0 14 Latch, 0 10 Chalk, 0 O1 Transportation, 1 40 Tieaeried 8 gece "pare on my back. In all, Soest el ah ei eer Le These are all the materials excepting the timber, stones and sand, which I claimed by squatter’s right. 86 WALDEN I have also a small wood-shed adjoining, made chiefly of the stuff which was left after building the house. I intend to build me a house which will surpass any on the main street in Concord in grandeur and luxury, as soon as it pleases me as much and will cost me no more than my present one. I thus found that the student who wishes for a shelter can obtain one for a lifetime at an expense not greater than the rent which he now pays annually. If I seem to boast more than is becoming, my excuse is that I brag for humanity rather than for myself; and my shortcomings and inconsistencies do not affect the truth of my statement. Notwithstanding much cant and hypocrisy ,—chaff which I find it difficult to sepa- rate from my wheat, but for which I am as sorry as any man,—I will breathe freely and stretch myself in this respect, it is such a relief to both the moral and physical system; and I am resolved that I will not through humility become the devil’s attorney. I will endeavor to speak a good word for the truth. At Cam- bridge College the mere rent of a student’s room, which is only a little larger than my own, is thirty dollars each year, though the corporation had the advantage of building thirty-two side by side and under one roof, and the occupant suffers the inconvenience of many and noisy neighbors, and perhaps a residence in the fourth story. I cannot but think that if we had more true wisdom in these respects, not only less education would be needed, because, forsooth, more would al- ready have been acquired, but the pecuniary expense ECONOMY 87 of getting an education would in a great measure vanish. Those conveniences which the student re- quires at Cambridge or elsewhere cost him or somebody else ten times as great a sacrifice of life as they would with proper management on both sides. Those things for which the most money is demanded are never the things which the student most wants. Tuition, for instance, is an important item in the term bill, while for the far more valuable education which he gets by associating with the most cultivated of his contempora- ries no charge is made. The mode of founding a college is, commonly, to get up a subscription of dollars and cents, and then following blindly the principles of a division of labor to its extreme, a principle which should never be followed but with circumspection,—to call in a contractor who makes this a subject of specula- tion, and he employs Irishmen or other operatives actually to lay the foundations, while the students that are to be are said to be fitting themselves for it; and for these oversights successive generations have to pay. I think that it would be better than this, for the students, or those who desire to be benefited by it, even to lay the foundation themselves. The student who secures his coveted leisure and retirement. by systematically shirking any labor necessary to man obtains but an ignoble and unprofitable leisure, de- frauding himself of the experience which alone can make leisure fruitful. ‘But,’ says one, “you do not mean that the students should go to work with their hands instead of their heads?”’ I do not mean that 88 WALDEN exactly, but I mean something which he might think a good deal like that; I mean that they should not play life, or study it merely, while the community supports them at this expensive game, but earnestly live it from beginning to end. How could youths better learn to live than by at once trying the experiment of living? Methinks this would exercise their minds as much as mathematics. If I wished a boy to know something about the arts and sciences, for instance, I would not pursue the common course, which is merely to send him into the neighborhood of some professor, where anything is professed and practised but the art of life;—to survey the world through a telescope, or a microscope and never with his natural eye; to study chemistry, and not learn how his bread is made, or mechanics, and not learn how it is earned; to discover new satellites to Neptune, and not detect the motes in his eyes, or to what vagabond he is a satellite himself; or to be devoured by the monsters that swarm all around him, while contemplating the monsters in a drop of vinegar. Which would have advanced the most at the end of a month,—the boy who had made his own jackknife from the ore which he had dug and smelted, reading as much as would be necessary for this,—or the boy who had attended the lectures on metallurgy at the Institute in the meanwhile, and had received a Rogers’ penknife from his father? Which would be most likely to cut his fingers? . . . To my astonishment I was informed on leaving college that I had studied navigation!—why, if I had taken one ECONOMY 89 turn down the harbor I should have known more about it. Hven the poor student studies and is taught only political economy, while that economy of living which is synonymous with philosophy is not even sincerely professed in our colleges. The consequence is, that while he is reading Adam Smith,’ Ricardo,’ and Say,’ he runs his father in debt irretrievably. As with our colleges, so with a hundred “modern improvements;”’ there is an illusion about them; there is not always a positive advance. The devil goes on exacting compound interest to the last for his early share and numerous succeeding investments in them. Our inventions are wont to be pretty toys, which dis- tract our attention from serious things. They are but improved means to an unimproved end, an end which it was already but too easy to arrive at; as railroads lead to Boston or New York. We are in great haste to construct a magnetic telegraph from Maine to Texas; but Maine and Texas, it may be, have nothing impor- tant to communicate. Either is in such a predicament as the man who was earnest to be introduced to a dis- tinguished deaf woman, but when he was presented, and one end of her ear trumpet was put into his hand, had nothing to say. As if the main object were to talk fast and not to talk sensibly. We are eager to tunnel under the Atlantic and bring the old world some weeks nearer to the new; but perchance the first news that will leak through into the broad, flapping American ear will be that the Princess Adelaide has the whooping cough. After all, the man whose horse trots a mile in 90 WALDEN a minute does not carry the most important messages; he is not an evangelist, nor does he come round eating locusts and wild honey.! - I doubt if Flying Childers ? ever carried a peck of corn to mill. One says to me ‘‘I wonder that you do not lay up money; you love to travel; you might take the cars and go to Fitchburg to-day and see the country.” But I am wiser than that. I have learned that the swiftest traveller is he that goes afoot. I say to my friend, Suppose we try who will get there first. The distance is thirty miles; the fare ninety cents. That is almost a day’s wages. JI remember when wages were sixty cents a day for laborers on this very road. Well, I start now on foot, and get there before night; I have travelled at that rate by the week together. You will in the meanwhile have earned your fare, and arrive there some time to-morrow, or possibly this evening, if you are lucky enough to get a job in season. Instead of going to Fitchburg, you will be working here the greater part of the day. And so, if the railroad reached round the world, I think that I should keep ahead of you; and as for seeing the coun- try and getting experience of that kind, I should have to cut your acquaintance altogether. Such is the universal law, which no man can ever outwit, and with regard to the railroad even we may say it is as broad as it is long. To make a railroad round the world available to all mankind is equiva- lent to grading the whole surface of the planet. Men have an indistinct notion that if they keep up this ECONOMY 91 activity of joint stocks and spades long enough all will at length ride somewhere, in next to no time, and for nothing; but though a crowd rushes to the depot, and the conductor shouts ‘‘ All aboard!’’ when the smoke is blown away and the vapor condensed, it will be perceived that a few are riding, but the rest are run over,—and it will be called, and will be, ‘A melancholy accident.’’ No doubt they can ride at last who shall have earned their fare, that is, if they survive so long, but they will probably have lost their elasticity and desire to travel by that time. This spending of the best part of one’s life earning money in order to enjoy a questionable liberty during the least valuable part of it, reminds me of the English- man who went to India to make a fortune first, in order that he might return to England and live the life of a poet. He should have gone up garret at once. “What!’’ exclaim a million Irishmen starting up from all the shanties in the land, ‘‘is not this railroad which we have built a good thing?’’ Yes, I answer, com- paratively good, that is, you might have done worse; but I wish, as you are brothers of mine, that you could have spent your time better than digging in this dirt. Before I had finished my house, wishing to earn ten or twelve dollars by some honest and agreeable method, in order to meet my unusual expenses, I planted about two acres and a half of light and sandy soil near it chiefly with beans, but also a small part with potatoes, corn, peas, and turnips. The whole 92 WALDEN lot contains eleven acres, mostly growing up in pines | and hickories, and was sold the preceding season for eight dollars and eight cents an acre. One farmer said that it was ‘“‘good for nothing but to raise cheep- ing squirrels on.’’ I put no manure whatever on this land, not being the owner, but merely a squatter and not expecting to cultivate so much again, and I did not quite hoe it all at once. I got out several cords of stumps in ploughing, which supplied me with fuel for a long time, and left small circles of virgin mould, easily distinguishable through the summer by the greater luxuriance of the beans there. The dead, and for the most part unmerchantable, wood behind my house, and the driftwood from the pond, have supplied the remainder of my fuel. I was obliged to hire a team and a man for the ploughing, though I held the plow myself. My farm outgoes for the first season were, for implements, seed, work, ete., $14.723. The seed corn was given me. This never costs any- thing to speak of, unless you plant more than enough. I got twelve bushels of beans, and eighteen bushels of potatoes, beside some peas and sweet corn. The yellow corn and turnips were too late to come to any- thing. My whole income from the farm was $23 44 Deducting the outgoes . ... . . 14 724 UHEKE GREAT) whey oy teh ey Sn’ oe oy ee beside produce consumed and on hand at the time this estimate was made of the value of. $4.50,—the ECONOMY. 93 amount on hand much more than balancing a little grass which I did not raise. All things considered, that is, considering the importance of a man’s soul and of to-day, notwithstanding the short time occupied by my experiment, nay, partly even because of its transient character, I believe that that was doing better than any farmer in Concord did that year. The next year I did better still, for I spaded up all the land which I required, about a third of an acre, and I learned from the experience of both years, not being in the least awed by many celebrated works on husbandry, Arthur Young among the rest, that if one would live simply and eat only the crop which he raised, and raise no more than he ate, and not. ex- change it for an insufficient quantity of more luxuri- ous and expensive things, he would need to cultivate only a few rods of ground, and that it would be cheaper to spade up that than to use oxen to plough it, and to select a fresh spot from time to time than to manure the old, and he could do all his necessary farm work as it were with his left hand at odd hours in the summer; and thus he would not be tied to an ox, or horse, or cow, or pig, as at present. I desire to speak impartially on this point, and as one not interested in the success or failure of the present economical and social arrange- ments. I was more independent than any farmer in Concord, for I was not anchored to a house or farm, but could follow the bent of my genius, which is a very crooked one, every moment. Beside being better off than they already, if my house had been burned or my 94 ‘WALDEN crops had failed, I should have been nearly as well off as before. I am wont to think that men are not so much the keepers of herds as herds are the keepers of men, the former are so much the freer. Men and oxen exchange work; but if we consider necessary work only, the oxen will be seen to have greatly the advantage, their farm is so much the larger. Man does some of his part of the exchange work in his six weeks of haying, and it is no boy’s play. Certainly no nation that lived simply in all respects, that is, no nation of philosophers, would commit so great a blunder as to use the labor of animals. True, there never was and is not likely soon to be a nation of philosophers, nor am I certain it is desirable there should be. However, J. should never have broken a horse or bull and taken him to board for any work he might do for me, for fear I should become a horse-man or a herds-man merely; and if society seems to be the gainer by so doing, are we certain that what is one man’s gain is not another’s loss, and that the stable-boy has equal cause with his master to be satisfied? Granted that some public works would not have been constructed without this aid, and let man share the glory of such with the ox and horse; does it follow that he could not have ac- complished works yet more worthy of himself in that case? When men begin to do, not merely unnecessary or artistic, but luxurious and idle work, with their assistance, it 1s inevitable that a few do all the ex- change work with the oxen, or, in other words, be- ECONOMY 95 come the slaves of the strongest. Man thus not only works for the animal within him, but, for a symbol of this, he works for the animal without him. Though we have many substantial houses of brick or stone, the prosperity of the farmer is still measured by the de- gree to which the barn overshadows the house. This town is said to have the largest houses for oxen, cows, and horses hereabouts, and it is not behindhand in its public buildings; but there are very few halls for free worship or free speech in this county. It should not be by their architecture, but why not even by their power of abstract thought, that nations should seek to commemorate themselves? How much more ad- mirable the Bhagvat-Geeta ! than all the ruins of the East! Towers and temples are the luxury of princes. A simple and independent mind does not toil at the bidding of any prince. Genius is not a retainer to any emperor, nor is its material silver, or gold, or marble, except to a trifling extent. To what end, pray, is so much stone hammered. In Arcadia, when I was there, I did not see any hammering stone. Na- tions are possessed with an insane ambition to per- petuate the memory of themselves by the amount of hammered stone they leave. What if equal pains were taken to smooth and polish their manners? One piece of good sense would be more memorable than a monument as high as the moon. I love better to see stones in place. The grandeur of Thebes was a vulgar grandeur. More sensible is a rod of stone wall that bounds an honest man’s field than a hundred- 96 WALDEN gated Thebes that has wandered farther from the true end of life. The religion and civilization which are barbaric and heathenish build splendid temples; but what you might call Christianity does not. Most of the stone a nation hammers goes toward its tomb only. It buries itself alive. As for the Pyramids, there is nothing to wonder at in them so much as the fact that so many men could be found degraded enough to spend their lives constructing a tomb for some ambitious booby, whom it would have been wiser and manlier to have drowned in the Nile, and then given his body to the dogs. I might possibly invent some excuse for them and him, but I have no time for it. As for the religion and love of art of the builders, it is much the same all the world over, whether the building be an Egyptian temple or the United States Bank. It costs more than it comes to. The main- spring is vanity, assisted by the love of garlic and bread and butter. Mr. Balcom, a promising young architect, designs it on the back of his Vitruvius,! with hard pencil and ruler, and the job is let out to Dobson «& Sons, stone-cutters. When the thirty cen- turies begin to look down on it, mankind begins to look up at it. As for your high towers and monu- ments, there was a crazy fellow once in this town who undertook to dig through to China, and he got so far that, as he said, he heard the Chinese pots and kettles rattle; but I think that I shall not go out of my way to admire the hole which he made. Many are concerned about the monuments of the West and the East,—to a ECONOMY 97 know who built them. For my part, I should like to know who in those days did not build them,—who were above such trifling. But to proceed with my statistics. By surveying, carpentry, and day-labor of various other kinds in the village in the meanwhile, for I have as many trades as fingers, I had earned $13.34. The expense of food for eight months, namely, from July 4th to March Ist, the time when these estimates were made, though I lived there more than two years, —not counting potatoes, a little green corn, and some peas, which I had raised, nor considering the value of what was on hand at the last date, was eee ey BL Tos Molasses, . . . 1 73 Cheapest form of the saccharine. Ive meal, . .°.. 1 04% Indian meal, .. . 0 993 Cheaper than rye. ee)... 0.22 Costs more than Indian Par. ss oe a 0 88 meal, both money and trouble. Sugar, 80 Wil ex Lard, 65 periments Apples, 25 which Dried apple, 22 failed: Sweet potatoes, One pumpkin, One watermelon, . Salt, Qe SS Sees — =) Yes, I did eat $8.74, all told; but I should not thus unblushingly publish my guilt, if I did not know that 98 WALDEN most of my readers were equally guilty with myself, and that their deeds would look no better in print. The next year I sometimes caught a mess of fish for my dinner, and once I went so far as to slaughter a wood- chuck which ravaged my beanfield,—effect his trans- migration, as a Tartar would say,—and devour him, partly for experiment’s sake; but though it afforded me a momentary enjoyment, notwithstanding a musky flavor, I saw that the longest use would not make that a good practice, however it might seem to have your woodchucks ready dressed by the village butcher. Clothing and some incidental expenses within the same dates, though little can be inferred from this item, amounted to $8 402 Oil and some household utensils, . . . . 2 00 So that all the pecuniary outgoes, excepting for wash- ing and mending, which for the most part were done out of the house, and their bills have not yet been re- ceived,—and these are all and more than all the ways by which money necessarily goes out in this part of the world,—were Plows: . otek Ww Foe dee ae Sean ae ee Far, ONEVear, oo oe pe a ee a (ree Food eight months) 3 ne ee ee Clothing, &c., eight months, . . . . . 8 40% Oil, &e., eightimonths) os) 4c i he ee Ee Bry lh) cfs SSeS Uke he oe cael ee eee I address myself now to those of my readers who have ECONOMY 39 a living to get. And to meet this I have for farm prod- uce sold $23 44 Earned by day labor, . . . novel (EB Ao MRT EN ee RR Sato Pe NR a te ae tae tke DOO: KO which subtracted from the sum of the outgoes leaves a balance of $25.21? on the one side,—this being very nearly the means with which I started, and the meas- ure of expenses to be incurred,—and on the other, beside the leisure and independence and health thus secured, a comfortable house for me as long as I choose to occupy it. These statistics, however accidental and therefore uninstructive they may appear, as they have a certain completeness, have a certain value also. Nothing was given me of which I have not rendered some ac- count. It appears from the above estimate, that my food alone cost me in money about twenty-seven cents a week. It was, for nearly two years after this, rye and Indian meal without yeast, potatoes, rice, a very little salt pork, molasses, and salt, and my drink water. It was fit that I should live on rice, mainly, who loved so well the philosophy of India. To meet the objections of some inveterate cavillers, I may as well state, that if I dined out occasionally, as I always had done, and I trust shall have oppor- tunities to do again, it was frequently to the detri- ment of my domestic arrangements. But the dining out, being, as I have stated, a constant element, does 100 WALDEN not in the least affect a comparative statement like this. I learned from my two years’ experience that it would cost incredibly little trouble to obtain one’s necessary food, even in this latitude; that a man may use as simple a diet as the animals, and yet retain health and strength. I have made a satisfactory dinner, satisfactory on several accounts, simply off a dish of purslane (Portulaca oleracea) which | gathered in my cornfield, boiled and salted. I give the Latin on account of the savoriness of the trivial name. And pray what more can a reasonable man desire, in peace- ful times, in ordinary noons, than a sufficient number of ears of green sweet-corn boiled, with the addition of salt? Even the little variety which I used was a yielding to the demands of appetite, and not of health. Yet men have come to such a pass that they frequently starve, not for want of necessaries, but for want of luxuries; and I know a good woman who thinks that her son lost his life because he took to drinking water only. The reader will perceive that I am treating the sub- ject rather from an economic than a dietetic point of view, and he will not venture to put my abste- miousness to the test unless he has a well-stocked larder. Bread I at first made of pure Indian meal and salt, genuine hoe-cakes, which I baked before my fire out of doors on a shingle or the end of a stick of timber sawed off in building my house; but it was wont to ECONOMY 101 get smoked and to have a piny flavor. I tried flour also; but have at last found a mixture of rye and Indian meal most convenient and agreeable. In cold weather it was no little amusement to bake several small loaves of this in succession, tending and turning them as carefully as an Egyptian his hatching eggs. They were a real cereal fruit which I ripened, and they had to my senses a fragrance like that of other noble fruits, which I kept in as long as possible by wrapping them in cloths. I made a study of the ancient and indispen- sable art of breadmaking, consulting such authorities as offered, going back to the primitive days and first invention of the unleavened kind, when from the wildness of nuts and meats men first reached the mild- ness and refinement of this diet, and travelling gradu- ally down in my studies through that accidental sour- ing of the dough which, it is supposed, taught the leavening process, and through the various fermenta- tions thereafter, till I came to ‘‘ good, sweet, wholesome bread,’”’ the staff of life. Leaven, which some deem the soul of bread, the spiritus which fills its cellular tissue, which is religiously preserved like the vestal fire,— some precious bottle-full, I suppose, first brought over in the Mayflower, did the business for America, and its influence is still rising, swelling, spreading, in cer- ealian billows over the land,—this seed I regularly and faithfully procured from the village, till at length one morning I forgot the rules, and scalded my yeast; by which accident I discovered that even this was not indispensable,—for my discoveries were not by the 102 WALDEN synthetic but analytic process,—and I have gladly omitted it since, though most housewives earnestly assured me that safe and wholesome bread without yeast might not be, and elderly people prophesied a speedy decay of the vital forces. Yet I find it not to be an essential ingredient, and after going without it for a year am still in the land of the living; and I am glad to escape the trivialness of carrying a bottle-full in my pocket, which would sometimes pop and discharge its contents to my discomfiture. It is simpler and more respectable to omit it. Man is an animal who more than any other can adapt himself to all climates and circumstances. Neither did I put any sal soda, or other acid or alkali, into my bread. It would seem that I made it according to the recipe which Marcus Porcius Cato! gave about two centuries before Christ. ‘“Panem depsticium sic facito. Manus mortariumque bene lavato. Farinam in mortarium indito, aque paulatim addito, subigitoque pulchre. Ubi bene subegeris, defingito, coquitoque sub testu.”” Which I take to mean—‘‘Make kneaded bread thus. Wash your hands and trough well. Put the meal into the trough, add water gradually, and knead it thoroughly. When you have kneaded it well, mould it, and bake it under a cover,’”’ that is, in a baking-kettle. Not a word about leaven. But I did not alway use this staff of life. At one time, owing to the emptiness of my purse, I saw none of it for more than a month. Every New Englander might easily raise all his own breadstuffs in this land of rye and Indian corn, ECONOMY 103 and not depend on distant and fluctuating markets for them. Yet so far are we from simplicity and in- dependence that, in Concord, fresh and sweet meal is rarely sold in the shops, and hominy and corn in a still coarser form are hardly used by any. For the most part the farmer gives to his cattle and hogs the grain of his own producing, and buys flour, which is at least no more wholesome, at a greater cost, at the store. I saw that I could easily raise my bushel or two of rye and Indian corn, for the former will grow on the poorest land, and the latter does not require the best, and grind them in a hand-mill, and so do without rice and pork; and if I must have some con- centrated sweet, I found by experiment that I could make a very good molasses either of pumpkins or beets, and I knew that I needed only to set out a few maples to obtain it more easily still, and while these were growing I could use various substitutes beside those which I have named. ‘‘For,”’ as the forefathers sang ,— “we can make liquor to sweeten our lips, Of pumpkins and parsnips and walnut-tree chips.” Finally, as for salt, that grossest of groceries, to obtain this might be a fit occasion for a visit to the seashore, or, if I did without it altogether, I should probably drink the less water. I do not learn that the Indians ever troubled themselves to go after it. Thus I could avoid all trade and barter, so far as my food was concerned, and having a shelter already, 104 WALDEN it would only remain to get clothing and fuel. The pantaloons which I now wear were woven in a farmer’s family,—thank Heaven there is so much virtue still in man; for I think the fall from the farmer to the operative as great and memorable as that from the man to the farmer;—and in a new country fuel is an encumbrance. As for a habitat, if I were not per- mitted still to squat, I might purchase one acre at the same price for which the land I cultivated was sold—namely, eight dollars and eight cents. But as it was, I considered that I enhanced the value of the land by squatting on it. There is a certain class of unbelievers who some- times ask me such questions as, if I think that I can live on vegetable food alone; and to strike at the root of the matter at once,—for the root is faith,—I am accustomed to answer such, that I can live on board nails. If they cannot understand that, they cannot understand much that I have to say. For my part, I am glad to hear of experiments of this kind being tried; as that a young man tried for a fortnight to live on hard, raw corn on the ear, using his teeth for all mortar. The squirrel tribe tried the same and suc- ceeded. The human race is interested in these ex- periments, though a few old women who are inea- pacitated for them, or who own their thirds in mills, may be alarmed. My furniture, part of which I made myself, and the rest cost me nothing of which I have not rendered an ECONOMY 105 account, consisted of a bed, a table, a desk, three chairs, a looking-glass three inches in diameter, a pair of tongs and andirons, a kettle, a skillet, and a frying- pan, a dipper, a wash-bowl, two knives and forks, three plates, one cup, one spoon, a jug for oil, a jug for molasses, and a japanned lamp. None is so poor that he need sit on a pumpkin. That is shiftlessness. There is a plenty of such chairs as I like best in the village garrets to be had for taking them away. Furni- ture! Thank God, I can sit and I can stand without the aid of a furniture warehouse. What man but a philosopher would not be ashamed to see his furniture packed in a cart and going up country exposed to the light of heaven and the eyes of men, a beggarly ac- count of empty boxes? That is Spaulding’s furniture. I could never tell from inspecting such a load whether it belonged to a so-called rich man or a poor one; the owner always seemed poverty-stricken. Indeed, the more you have of such things the poorer you are. Each load looks as if it contained the contents of a dozen shanties; and if one shanty is poor, this is a dozen times as poor. Pray, for what do we move ever but to get rid of our furniture, our exuvie; at last to go from this world to another newly furnished, and leave this to be burned? It is the same as if all these traps were buckled to a man’s belt, and he could not move over the rough country where our lines are cast without dragging them,—dragging his trap. He was a lucky fox that left his tail in the trap. The muskrat will gnaw his third leg off to be free. No wonder man has 106 WALDEN lost his elasticity. How often he is at a dead set. ‘‘Sir, if I may be so bold, what do you mean by a dead set?”’ If you are a seer, whenever you meet a man you will see all that he owns, ay, and much that he pretends to disown, behind him, even to his kitchen furniture and all the trumpery which he saves and will not burn, and he will appear to be harnessed to it and making what headway he can. I think that the man is at a dead set who has got through a knot hole or gateway where his sledge load of furniture cannot follow him. I cannot but feel compassion when I hear some trig, compact-looking man, seemingly free, all girded and ready, speak of his ‘‘furniture,’’ as whether it is in- sured or not. ‘But what shall I do with my furni- ture?’ My gay butterfly is entangled in a spider’s web then. Even those who seem for a long while not to have any, if you inquire more narrowly you will find have some stored in somebody’s barn. I look upon England to-day as an old gentleman who is travelling with a great deal of baggage, trumpery which has ac- cumulated from long housekeeping, which he has not the courage to burn; great trunk, little trunk, bandbox and bundle. Throw away the first three at least. It would surpass the powers of a well man nowadays to take up his bed and walk, and I should certainly ad- vise a sick one to lay down his bed and run. When I have met an immigrant tottering under a bundle which contained his all—looking like an enormous wen which had grown out of the nape of his neck—I have pitied him, not because that was his all, but because he had ECONOMY 107 all that to carry. If I have got to drag my trap, I will take care that it be a light one and do not nip me ina vital part. But perchance it would be wisest never to put one’s paw into it. I would observe, by the way, that it costs me noth- ing for curtains, for I have no gazers to shut out but the sun and moon, and I am willing that they should look in. The moon will not sour milk nor taint meat of mine, nor will the sun injure my furniture or fade my carpet, and if he is sometimes too warm a friend, I find it still better economy to retreat behind some curtain which nature has provided, than to add a sin- gle item to the details of housekeeping. er,” I visited it. There lax ibis.ald clothes up use, as if they were himseii,Japon his raisea ,..nk bed. His! pipe lay broken on the hearth, instead c. a bowl broken at the fountain. The last could ne * have been the symbol of his death, for he confessec -.. me that, though he had heard of Brister’s Spring, he Aad never seen it; and soiled cards, kings of diamonds)Jspades and hearts, were scattered over the flooe’’ “5 black chicken which the administrator cou! catch, black as night and as silent, not even cro ., awaiting Reynard, still went to roost in the nex ‘artment. In the rear there was the dim out- liné “a garden, which had been planted but had never rece ‘ved its first hoeing, owing to those terrible shaking fits» though it was now harvest time. It was over-run with Roman wormwood and beggar-ticks, which la:t stuck to my clothes for all fruit. The skin of a woe “? FORMER INHABITANTS 335 chuck was freshly stretched upon the back of the house, a trophy of his last Waterloo; but no warm cap or mittens would he want more. Now only a dent in the earth marks the site of these dwellings, with buried cellar stones, and strawberries, raspberries, thimble-berries, hazel-bushes, and sumachs growing in the sunny sward there; some pitch-pine or gnarled oak occupies what was the chimney nook, and a sweet-scented black-birch, perhaps, waves where the door-stone was. Sometimes the well dent is visible, where once a spring oozed; now dry and tearless grass; or it was covered deep,—not to be discovered till some late day,—with a flat stone under the sod, when the last of the race departed. What.slt:arre~* | act must tha . ,—the covermg up of wel: coinbsin..s with the opening of wells of tears. ‘hese cellar Gusts, like de- serted fox burrows, old holes, are all that ii left where once were the stir and bustle of human life: »nd “fate, free-will, foreknowledge absolute,” in sow» !form and :dialect or other were by turns discussec But all I ean learn of their conclusions amounts “9 just this, that ‘Cato and Brister pulled wool;”’ whic - ut as edifying as the history of more famous .. 1s of philosophy. Still grows the vivacious lilac a generat after the door and lintel and the sill are gone, un ‘ding its sweet scented flowers each spring, to be p. cked ‘by the musing traveller; planted and tended on e by ‘ehildren’s hands, in front-yard plots,—now standing -nxy wall-sides in retired pastures, and giving place to 336 WALDEN new-rising forests ;—the last of that stirp, sole survivor of that family. Little did the dusky children think that the puny slip with its two eyes only, which they stuck in the ground in the shadow of the house and daily watered, would root itself so, and outlive them, and house itself in the rear that shaded it, and grown man’s garden and orchard, and tell their story faintly to the lone wanderer a half century after they had grown up and died,—blossoming as fair, and smelling as sweet, as in that first spring. I mark its still tender, civil, cheerful, lilac colors. But this small village, germ of something more, why did it fail while Concord keeps its ground? Were there no natural advantages,—no water privileges, forsooth? Ay, the deep Walden Pond and cool Bris- ter’s Spring,—privilege to drink long and _ healthy draughts at these, all unimproved by these men but to dilute their glass. They were universally a thirsty race. Might not the basket, stable-broom, mat-making, corn- parching, linen-spinning, and pottery business have thrived here, making the wilderness to blossom like the rose, and a numerous posterity have inherited the land of their fathers? The sterile soil would at least have been proof against a low-land degeneracy. Alas! how little does the memory of these human inhabitants en- hance the beauty of the landscape! Again, perhaps, Nature will try, with me for a first settler, and my house raised last spring to be the oldest in the hamlet. I am not aware that any man has ever built on the spot which I occupy. Deliver me from a city built FORMER INHABITANTS 337 on the site of a more ancient city, whose materials are ruins, whose gardens cemeteries. The soil is blanched and accursed there, and before that becomes necessary the earth itself will be destroyed. With such reminiscences I repeopled the woods and lulled myself asleep. At this season I seldom had a visitor. When the snow lay deepest no wanderer ventured near my house for a week or fortnight at a time, but there I lived as snug as a meadow mouse, or as cattle and poultry which are said to have survived for a long time buried in drifts, even without food; or like that early settler’s family in the town of Sutton, in this State, whose cottage was completely covered by the great snow of 1717 when he was absent, and an Indian found it only by the hole which the chimney’s breath made in the drift, and so relieved the family. But no friendly Indian concerned himself about me; nor needed he, for the master of the house was at home. The Great Snow! How cheerful it is to hear of! When the farmers could not get to the woods and swamps with their teams, and were obliged to cut down the shade trees before their houses, and when the crust was harder cut off the trees in the swamps ten feet from the ground, as it appeared the next spring. In the deepest snows, the path which I used from the highway to my house, about half a mile long, might have been represented by a meandering dotted line, with wide intervals between the dots. For a week of even weather I took exactly the same number of steps, 338 WALDEN and of the same length, coming and going, stepping de- liberately and with the precision of a pair of dividers in my own deep tracks,—to such routine the winter reduces us,—yet often they were filled with heaven’s own blue. But no weather interfered fatally with my walks, or rather my going abroad, for I frequently tramped eight or ten miles through the deepest snow to keep an appointment with a beech-tree, or a yellow- birch, or an old acquaintance among the pines; when the ice and snow causing their limbs to droop, and so sharpening their tops, had changed the pines into fir- trees; wading to the tops of the highest hills when the snow was nearly two feet deep on a level, and shaking down another snowstorm on my head at every step; or sometimes creeping and floundering thither on my hands and knees, when the hunters had gone into winter quarters. One afternoon I amused myself by watching a barred owl (Strix nebulosa) sitting on one of the lower dead limbs of a white-pine, close to the trunk, in broad daylight, I standing within a rod of him. Hecould hear me when I moved and cronched the snow with my feet, but could not plainly see me. When I made most noise he would stretch out his neck, and erect his neck feathers, and open his eyes wide; but their lids soon fell, and he began to nod. I too felt a slumberous influence after watching him half an hour, as he sat thus with his eyes half open, like a cat, winged brother of the cat. There was only a narrow slit left between their lids, by which he pre- served a peninsular relation to me; thus, with half- FORMER INHABITANTS 339 shut eyes, looking out from the land of dreams, and endeavoring to realize me, vague object or mote that interrupted his visions. At length, on some louder noise or my nearer approach, he would grow uneasy and sluggishly turn about on his perch, as if impa- tient at having his dreams disturbed; and when he launched hiniself off and flapped through the pines, spreading his wings to unexpected breadth, I could not hear the slightest sound from them. Thus, guided amid the pine boughs rather by a delicate sense of their neighborhood than by sight, feeling his twilight way as it were with his sensitive pinions, he found a new perch, where he might in peace await the dawning of his day. As I walked over the long ¢auseway made for the railroad through the meadows, I encountered many a blustering and nipping wind, for nowhere has it freer play; and when the frost had smitten me on one cheek, heathen as I was, I turned to it the other also. Nor was it much better by the carriage road from Brister’s Hill. For I came to town still, like a friendly Indian, when the contents of the broad open fields were all piled up between the walls of the Walden road, and half an hour sufficed to obliterate the tracks of the last traveller. And when I returned new drifts would have formed, through which I floundered, where the busy north-west wind has been depositing the powdery snow round a sharp angle in the road, and not a rabbit’s track, nor even the fine print, the small type, of a meadow mouse was to be seen. Yet I rarely failed 340 WALDEN to find, even in mid-winter, some warm and springy swamp where the grass and the skunk-cabbage still put forth with perennial verdure, and some hardier bird occasionally awaited the return of spring. Sometimes, notwithstanding the snow, when I re- turned from my walk at evening I crossed the deep tracks of a wood-chopper leading from my door, and found his pile of whittlings on the hearth, and my house filled with the odor of his pipe. Or on a Sunday afternoon, if I chanced to be at home, I heard the cronching of the snow made by the step of a long- headed farmer, who from far through the woods sought my house, to have a social ‘“crack;” one of the few of his vocation who are “men on their farms;”’ who donned a frock instead of a professor’s gown, and is as ready to extract the moral out of church or state as to haul a load of manure from his barn-yard. We talked of rude and simple times, when men sat about large fires in cold bracing weather, with clear heads; and when other dessert failed, we tried our teeth on many a nut which wise squirrels have long since abandoned, for those which have the thickest shells are commonly empty. The one who came from farthest to my lodge, through deepest snows and most dismal tempests, was a poet. A farmer, a hunter, a soldier, a reporter, even a philosopher, may be daunted; but nothing can deter a poet, for he is actuated by pure love. Who can predict his comings and goings? His business calls him out at all hours, even when doctors sleep. FORMER INHABITANTS 341 We made that small house ring with boisterous mirth and resound with the murmur of much sober talk, making amends then to Walden vale for the long silences. Broadway was still and deserted in compari- son. At suitable intervals there were regular salutes of laughter, which might have been referred indiffer- ently to the last uttered or the forthcoming jest. We made many a “bran new”’ theory of life over a thin dish of gruel, which combined the advantages of con- viviality with the clear-headedness which philosophy requires. I should not forget that during my last winter at the pond there was another welcome visitor, who at one time came through the village, through snow and rain and darkness, till he saw my lamp through the trees, and shared with me some long winter evenings. One of the last of the philosophers,—Connecticut gave him to the world,—he peddled first her wares, afterwards, as he declares, his brains. These he peddles still, prompting God and disgracing man, bearing for fruit his brain only, like the nut its kernel. I think that he must be the man of the most faith of any alive. His words and attitude always suppose a better state of things than other men are acquainted with, and he will be the last man to be disappointed as the ages revolve. He has no venture in the present. But: though com- paratively disregarded now, when his day comes, laws unsuspected by most will take effect, and masters of families and rulers will come to him for advice.— 1”? “How blind that cannot see serenity 342 WALDEN A true friend of man; almost the only friend of human progress. An Old Mortality, say rather an Immortality, with unwearied patience and faith making plain the image engraven in men’s bodies, the God of whom they are but defaced and leaning monuments. With his hospitable intellect he embraces children, beggars, in- sane, and scholars, and entertains the thought of all, adding to it commonly some breadth and elegance. I think that he should keep a caravansary on the world’s highway, where philosophers of all nations might put up, and on his sign should be printed, ‘ Entertain- ment for man, but not for his beast. Enter ye that have leisure and a quiet mind, who earnestly seek the right road.’’ He is perhaps the sanest man and has the fewest crochets of any I chance to know; the same yesterday and to-morrow. Of yore we had sauntered and talked, and effectually put the world behind us; for he was pledged to no institution in it, freeborn, ingenuus. Whichever way we turned, it seemed that the heavens and the earth had met together, since he enhanced the beauty of the landscape. A blue-robed man, whose fittest roof is the overarching sky which reflects his serenity. I do not see how he can ever die; Nature cannot spare him. Having each some shingles of thought well dried, we sat and whittled them, trying our knives, and ad- miring the clear yellowish grain of the pumpkin pine. We waded so gently and reverently, or we pulled to- gether so smoothly, that the fishes of thought were not scared from the stream, nor feared any angler on the FORMER INHABITANTS 343 bank, but came and went grandly, like the clouds which float through the western sky, and the mother-o’- pearl flocks which sometimes form and dissolve there. There we worked, revising mythology, rounding a fable here and there, and building castles in the air for which earth offered no worthy foundation. Great Looker! Great Expecter! to converse with whom was a New England Night’s Entertainment. Ah! such discourse we had, hermit and philosopher, and the old settler I have spoken of,—we three,—it expanded and racked my little house; I should not dare to say how many pounds’ weight there was above the atmospheric pressure on every circular inch; it opened its seams so that they had to be calked with much dulness there- after to stop the constant leak;—but I had enough of that kind of oakum already picked. There was one other with whom I had “‘solid sea- sons,’ long to be remembered, at his house in the village, and who looked in upon me from time to time; but I had no more for society there. There too, as everywhere, I sometimes expected the Visitor who never comes. The Vishnu Purana says, “The house-holder is to remain at eventide in his court- yard as long as it takes to milk a cow, or longer if he pleases, to await the arrival of a guest.’”’ I often performed this duty of hospitality, waited long enough to milk a whole herd of cows, but did not see the man approaching from the town. WINTER ANIMALS WueEN the ponds were firmly frozen, they afforded not only new and shorter routes to many points, but new views from their surfaces of the familiar land- scape around them. When I crossed Flints’ Pond, after it was covered with snow, though I had often paddled about and skated over it, it was so unex- pectedly wide and so strange that I could think of noth- ing but Baffin’s Bay. The Lincoln hills rose up around me at the extremity of a snowy plain, in which I did not remember to have stood before; and the fishermen, at an indeterminable distance over the ice, moving slowly about with their wolfish dogs, passed for sealers, or Esquimaux, or in misty weather loomed like fabulous creatures, and I did not know whether they were giants or pygmies. I took this course when I went to lecture in Lincoln in the evening, travelling in no road and passing no house between my own hut and the lecture room. In Goose Pond, which lay in my way, a colony of muskrats dwelt, and raised their cabins high above the ice, though none could be seen abroad when I crossed it. Walden, being like the rest usually bare of snow, or with only shallow and interrupted drifts on it, was my yard, where I could walk freely when the snow was nearly two feet deep on a level elsewhere 344 WINTER ANIMALS 345 ° and the villagers were confined to their streets. There, far from the village street, and except at very long intervals, from the jingle of sleigh-bells, I slid and skated, as in a vast moose-yard well trodden, over- hung by oak woods and solemn pines bent down with snow or bristling with icicles. For sounds in winter nights, and often in winter days, I heard the forlorn but melodious note of a hoot- ing owl indefinitely far; such a sound as the frozen earth would yield if struck with a suitable plectrum, the very lingua vernacula of Walden Wood, and quite familiar to me at last, though I never saw the bird while it was making it. I seldom opened my door in a winter evening without hearing it; Hoo hoo hoo, hoorer hoo, sounded sonorously, and the first three syllables accented somewhat like how der do; or sometimes hoo hoo only. One night in the beginning of winter, be- fore the pond froze over, about nine o’clock, I was startled by the loud honking of a goose, and, stepping to the door, heard the sound of their wings like a tempest in the woods as they flew low over my house. They passed over the pond toward Fair Haven, seem- ingly deterred from settling by my light, their commo- dore honking all the while with a regular beat. Sud- denly an unmistakable cat-owl from very near me, with the most harsh and tremendous voice I ever heard from any inhabitant of the woods, responded at regular intervals to the goose, as if determined to expose and disgrace this intruder from Hudson’s Bay, by exhib- iting a greater compass and volume of voice in a native, 346 WALDEN and boo-hoo him out of Concord horizon. What do you mean by alarming the citadel at this time of night consecrated to me? Do you think I am ever caught napping at such an hour, and that I have not got lungs and a larynx as well as yourself? Boo-hoo, boo- hoo, boo-hoo! It was one of the most thrilling discords I ever heard. And yet, if you had a discriminating ear, there were in it the elements of a concord such as these plains never saw nor heard. I also heard the whooping of the ice in the pond, my great bed-fellow in that part of Concord, as if it were restless in its bed and would fain turn over, were troubled with flatulency and bad dreams; or I was waked by the cracking of the ground by the frost, as if some one had driven a team against my door, and in the morning would find a crack in the earth a quarter of a mile long and a third of an inch wide. Sometimes I heard the foxes as they ranged over the snow crust, in moonlight nights, in search of a partridge or other game, barking raggedly and de- moniacally like forest dogs, as if laboring with some anxiety, or seeking expression, struggling for light and to be dogs outright and run freely in the streets; for if we take the ages into our account, may there not be a civilization going on among brutes as well as men? They seemed to me to be rudimental, bur- rowing men, still standing on their defence, awaiting their transformation. Sometimes one came near to my window, attracted by my light, barked a vulpine curse at me, and then retreated. WINTER ANIMALS 347 Usually the red squirrel (Sciurus Hudsonius) waked me in the dawn, coursing over the roof and up and down the sides of the house, as if sent out of the woods for this purpose. In the course of the winter I threw out half a bushel of ears of sweet-corn which had not got ripe, on to the snow crust by my door, and was amused by watching the motions of the various animals which were baited by it. In the twilight and the night the rabbits came regularly and made a hearty meal. All day long the red squirrels came and went, and afforded me much entertainment by their manceuvres. One would approach at first warily through the shrub- oaks, running over the snow crust by fits and starts like a leaf blown by the wind, now a few paces this way, with wonderful speed and waste of energy, mak- ing inconceivable haste with his “‘trotters,’’ as if it were for a wager, and now as many paces that way, but never getting on more than half a rod at a time; and then suddenly pausing with a ludicrous expression and a gratuitous somerset, as if all the eyes in the universe were fixed on him,—for all the motions of a squirrel, even in the most solitary recesses of the forest, imply spectators as much as those of a dancing girl,—wasting more time in delay and circumspection than would have sufficed to walk the whole distance,—I never saw one walk,—and then suddenly, before you could say Jack Robinson, he would be in the top of a young pitch-pine, winding up his clock and chiding all imaginary specta- tors, soliloquizing and talking to all the universe at the same time,—for no reason that I could ever detect, 348 WALDEN or he himself was aware of, I suspect. At length he would reach the corn, and selecting a suitable ear, brisk about in the same uncertain trigonometrical way to the top-most stick of my wood-pile, before my window, where he looked me in the face, and there sit for hours, supplying himself with a new ear from time to time, nibbling at first voraciously and throwing the half-naked cobs about; till at length he grew more dainty still and played with his food, tasting only the inside of the kernel, and the ear, which was held bal- anced over the stick by one paw, slipped from his careless grasp and fell to the ground, when he would look over at it with a ludicrous expression of uncer- tainty, as if suspecting that it had life, with a mind not made up whether to get it again, or a new one, or be off; now thinking of corn, then listening to hear what was in the wind. So the little impudent fellow would waste many an ear in a forenoon; till at last seizing some longer and plumper one, considerably bigger than him- self, and skilfully balancing it, he would set out with it to the woods, like a tiger with a buffalo, by the same ziz-zag course and frequent pauses, scratching along with it as if it were too heavy for him and falling all the while, making its fall a diagonal between a perpendic- ular and horizontal, being determined to put it through at any rate;—a singularly frivolous and whimsical fel- low;—and so he would get off with it to where he lived, perhaps carry it to the top of a pine tree forty or fifty rods distant, and I would afterwards find the cobs strewn about the woods in various directions. WINTER ANIMALS 349 At length the jays arrive, whose discordant screams were heard long before, as they were warily making their approach an eighth of a mile off, and in a stealthy and sneaking manner they flit from tree to tree, nearer and nearer, and pick up the kernels which the squirrels have dropped. Then, sitting on a pitch-pine bough, they attempt to swallow in their haste a kernel which is too’ big for their throats and chokes them; and after great labor they disgorge it, and spend an hour in thé endeavor to crack it by repeated blows with their bills. They were manifestly thieves, and I had not much respect for them; but the squirrels, though at first shy, went to work as if they were taking what was their own. Meanwhile also came the chicadees in flocks, which, picking up the crumbs the squirrels had dropped, flew to the nearest twig, and, placing them under their claws, hammered away at them with their little bills, as if it were an insect in the bark, till they were suffi- ciently reduced for their slender throats. ne ae ho artie ie re catty oh ay ott p Bi: “ - ‘ eo te , ia a yi ee ; er a ee ee ae ae yore] 4 f _— ' < - é = i i . Ps ag $ fen ae PPP aD a ES hoe ws Sane . ‘ a8 et 236.) \ > a, =3" be) (7 SU See a Steele) : = J ¥ ra r a ry a uve igs fe) ay a > | iL AS Rie tye & Fale: fo ergs gin ae oe 4 a Ur Ftp, ie al ee ee yates ea P areeres TUAMHTLRL AM 0 015 973 463 8