Skip to main content

Full text of "Mississippi forest atlas"

See other formats


Historic,  Archive  Document 

Do  not  assume  content  reflects  current 
scientific  knowledge,  policies,  or  practices. 


A99 

.16 

. F762M 


g^MOND  I.  SWEWSEN 
FORESTER 


SMALL  BUSINESS  MANAGEMENT 
RESEARCH  REPORTS 


Prepared  by 

SOUTHERN  FOREST  EXPERIMENT  STATION 
FOREST  SERVICE,  U.  S.  DEPT.  OF  AGRICULTURE 

for  the 

MISSISSIPPI  INDUSTRIAL  AND  TECHNOLOGICAL  RESEARCH  COMMISSION 

under  a grant  from  the 
Small  Business  Administration 
Washington  25,  D.  C. 


This  Small  Business  study,  "Mississippi  Forest  Atlas,"  has  been  con- 
ducted and  prepared  under  the  direction  of  Director  Henry  H.  Leveck,  Pro- 
ject Supervisor  for  Mississippi  State  University,  and  Dr.  A.  D.  Suttle,  Jr., 
Project  Director  for  Mississippi  Industrial  and  Technological  Research  Com- 
mission. 

The  research  was  financed  by  a grant  made  by  the  Small  Business 
Administration,  United  States  Government,  under  the  authority  of  Public 
Law  699  (85th  Congress). 

Only  a limited  number  of  copies  of  this  report  have  been  printed.  It 
is  available  for  reference  in  any  of  the  Small  Business  Administration  offices 
throughout  the  United  States  or  at  many  reference  libraries.  Copies  of  the 
report  also  may  be  obtained  without  charge  directly  from  Mississippi  Agri- 
cultural Experiment  Station,  State  College,  Mississippi. 

Summaries  of  this  study  are  being  printed  and  will  be  available  in 
reasonable  quantities.  These  summaries  may  be  secured  from  SBA  field 
offices  or  from  the  Small  Business  Administration,  VVashington  25,  D.  C. 

The  Small  Business  Administration  assumes  no  responsibility  for  the 
accuracy  of  the  data  contained  herein,  nor  does  it  necessarily  endorse  any 
opinions,  conclusions,or  recommendations  which  may  be  a part  of  this  report. 


John  E.  Horne 

Administrator 

Small  Business  Administration 


MISSISSIPPI 
FOREST  ATLAS 


eJi&ikeSit  £.  Stefisutyhe 


* F5' v\>5' 


o.  \;v 

.**&r 

'V°'J  oS 


*?&2 


Prepared  by 

SOUTHERN  FOREST  EXPERIMENT  STATION 

under  a Small  Business  Administration  grant 
awarded  to  the 

MISSISSIPPI  INDUSTRIAL  AND  TECHNOLOGICAL  RESEARCH  COMMISSION 


Project  Director 

H.  H.  LEVECK 

Director,  Mississippi  Agricultural  Experiment  Station 


1962 


Contents 


Page 

Mississippi  forests:  an  industrial  resource  _ 1 

Timber  resources  1 

Opportunities  for  forest  industry  expansion  _ _ . 2 

Accuracy  of  the  survey  4 

Definitions  of  terms  4 

Forest  resource  maps 7 

1.  Commercial  forest  land  8 

2.  Major  forest-type  groups  9 

3.  Change  in  commercial  forest  area,  1948-57  10 

4.  Forest-industry  ownership  11 

5.  Change  in  number  of  growing  stock  trees,  1948-57  12 

6.  Pine  sawtimber  13 

7 Ash  sawtimber  14 

8.  Cottonwood  sawtimber 15 

9.  Willow  sawtimber  16 

10.  White  elm  sawtimber  17 

11.  Tupelo  and  blackgum  sawtimber  18 

12.  Sweetgum  sawtimber  - 19 

13.  Hickory  sawtimber  20 

14.  Pecan  sawtimber  21 

15.  Sweetbay  and  magnolia  sawtimber  22 

16.  Yellow-poplar  sawtimber 23 

17.  Red  oak  sawtimber  24 

18.  White  oak  sawtimber  25 

19.  Hackberry  sawtimber  26 

20.  Sycamore  sawtimber  27 

21.  Beech  sawtimber  — 28 

22.  Hardwood  sawtimber  in  standard  factory  lumber  logs  29 

23.  Average  volume  per  acre  of  pine  sawtimber  in  softwood  types  30 

24.  Average  volume  per  acre  of  hardwood  sawtimber 

in  softwood  types  _■ 31 

25.  Average  sawtimber  volume  per  acre  in  hardwood  types  . 32 

26.  Relationship  of  growth  and  cut  of  softwood  sawtimber  ____  33 

27.  Relationship  of  growth  and  cut  of  hardwood  sawtimber  ____  34 

28.  Output  of  pine  pulpwood,  1959  35 

29.  Output  of  industrial  softwood  (except  pulpwood),  1959  — . 36 

30.  Output  of  hardwood  pulpwood,  1959  37 

31.  Output  of  industrial  hardwood  (except  pulpwood),  1959  38 

Tables  39 

1.  Sawtimber  volume  by  species  1 

2.  Growing  stock  volume  by  species  group  and  county  ....  - 40 

3.  Growing  stock  volume  by  diameter  group  and  county  42 

4.  Sawtimber  volume  by  species  group  and  county  44 

5.  Sawtimber  volume  by  diameter  group  and  county  46 

6.  Land  area  and  commercial  forest  by  county  48 


iii 


Forest  Survey  regions  in  Mississippi. 


IV 


Mississippi  Forests:  An  Industrial  Resource 


In  the  search  for  resources  to  support  indus- 
trial expansion  in  Mississippi,  it  is  logical  to 
turn  to  the  forests.  The  area  occupied  by 
forests  in  Mississippi  exceeds  the  combined 
acreage  in  all  other  land  uses.  Each  year  tre- 
mendous quantities  of  pine  and  hardwood  are 
taken  from  these  forests  and  made  into  a wide 
variety  of  products. 

This  report  provides  information  to  assist 
managers  of  wood-using  industries  and  con- 
sulting foresters  in  appraising  locations  and 
categories  of  standing  timber  that  may  offer 
possibilities  for  development.  It  is  based  main- 
ly upon  data  gathered  during  the  most  recent 
Forest  Survey  of  Mississippi,  which  was  com- 
pleted in  1957  by  the  Southern  Forest  Experi- 
ment Station.  It  also  draws  upon  the  previous 
survey  of  1948  in  order  to  show  the  changes 
that  have  been  occurring.  The  information  is 
largely  in  the  form  of  generalized  maps  that 
describe  various  aspects  of  the  forest  situation, 
such  as  the  geographic  distribution  of  timber 
volume,  woodland  area,  and  output  of  timber 
products. 

TIMBER  RESOURCES 

Forests  predominantly  of  longleaf  and  slash 
pine  characterize  the  lower  Coastal  Plain  and 
comprise  2 million  of  Mississippi’s  17.2  million 
woodland  acres.  Extending  north  from  the 
coastal  region,  loblolly  and  shortleaf  pine  cover 
4.6  million  acres.  Another  2.7  million  acres  of 
uplands  are  occupied  by  oak,  hickory,  and  other 
hardwoods  in  mixture  with  various  pines.  In 
the  Delta  and  along  rivers  and  streams  through- 
out the  State  are  stands  of  bottom-land  hard- 
woods that  aggregate  3.8  million  acres.  Upland 
hardwood  forests,  largely  concentrated  in  a 
zone  bordering  the  eastern  edge  of  the  Mis- 
sissippi River  alluvial  plain,  total  4.1  million 
acres. 


As  is  shown  in  table  1,  pine  makes  up  51 
percent  of  the  sawtimber  inventory  in  Mis- 
sissippi forests.  Other  softwoods — cypress  and 
redcedar — total  scarcely  2 percent.  Of  the 
hardwood  volume,  oaks  account  for  36  percent, 
gums  27  percent,  hickories  9 percent;  and  the 
remaining  28  percent  consists  of  other  hard- 
woods, with  yellow-poplar,  elm,  cottonwood, 
magnolia,  willow,  ash,  beech,  sycamore,  and 
hackberry  ranking  in  the  order  named. 


Table  1.  Sawtimber  volume  by  species 


Species 

Volume 

Million  board  feet 

Pine 

12,972.3 

Other  softwoods 

565.1 

Red  oaks 

2,544.6 

White  oaks 

1,730.0 

Pecan 

354.7 

Other  hickories 

781.0 

Sweetgum 

1,934.8 

Tupelo  and  blackgum 

1,318.2 

Cottonwood 

453.5 

Willow 

318.5 

Soft  maples 

89.5 

Yellow-poplar 

498.9 

Sweetbay  and  magnolia 

327.6 

White  elm 

258.9 

Other  elms 

228.1 

Ash 

271.8 

Hackberry 

161.7 

Beech 

241.5 

Sycamore 

240.5 

Other  hardwoods 

255.5 

Total 

25,546.7 

In  general,  quality  specifications  are  more 
demanding  for  hardwood  than  for  pine.  Among 
the  several  industrial  uses  of  hardwoods,  the 
manufacture  of  standard  factory  lumber  pre- 
dominates. Suitability  of  logs  for  this  purpose, 
therefore,  may  be  taken  as  one  measure  of  the 


variability  as  well  as  the  utility  of  the  current 
hardwood  inventory. 

Nearly  9 billion  board  feet  of  Mississippi’s 
standing  hardwood  is  in  logs  of  standard  fac- 
tory lumber  grade.  Of  this,  some  30  percent 
is  in  grades  1 and  2 — the  logs  most  generally 
in  demand  by  sawmills,  veneer  plants,  and 
other  industries  needing  clear  material.  The 
6 billion  board  feet  of  grade  3 volume  simply 
consist  of  the  lowest  grade  of  logs  that  are 
suitable  for  conversion  into  standard  lumber, 
in  the  sense  that  they  are  capable  of  yielding 
practical  proportions  of  clear  cuttings. 

These  grades,  developed  by  the  U.  S.  Forest 
Products  Laboratory,  take  into  account  the 
diameter,  length,  and  amount  of  defects  in  indi- 
vidual logs.  1 Studies  have  shown  that  they 
dependably  predict  the  lumber  grade  outturn 
of  logs  of  specified  grade.  For  nearly  all  species 
tested,  the  yield  of  No.  1 Common  and  better 
lumber  in  grade  1 logs  varies  from  65  to  80 
percent;  in  grade  2 logs  from  40  to  64  percent; 
and  in  grade  3 logs  from  13  to  36  percent. 

The  remaining  3 billion  board  feet  of  hard- 
wood inventory  is  in  tie  and  timber  logs — logs 
with  so  many  sound  defects  that  they  will  not 
produce  worthwhile  amounts  of  clear  material, 
when  sawn  wholly  into  lumber.  They  are 
presently  suited,  however,  for  such  uses  as 
heavy  structural  material,  crating,  and  cross- 
ties. 

Both  the  relative  density  and  the  dispersion 
of  the  timber  within  the  State  vary  widely  by 
species  ( see  figs.  6-22  ) . Broadly  speaking,  the 
greatest  concentration  of  pine  sawtimber  is 
in  the  southeastern  and  southwestern  sections. 
Among  hardwoods,  oaks  greatly  exceed  all 
others  not  only  in  volume  but  in  extent  of 
distribution.  Hickory,  sweetgum,  and  black- 
gum  also  range  widely,  the  latter  two  attaining 
their  best  development  in  the  bottom  lands. 
Yellow-poplar  is  thinly  scattered  east  of  the 
Delta.  Ash  and  white  elm,  though  widely  dis- 
persed, are  most  common  in  the  western  part 
of  the  State.  Cottonwood,  willow,  pecan,  syca- 
more, and  hackberry  are  most  prominent  in 
the  Mississippi  River  bottoms.  Magnolia  is 
found  mainly  in  the  southeastern  counties, 
beech,  in  the  southwest. 

1 For  detailed  specifications  of  log  grades,  see  Hardwood  log 
grades  for  standard  lumber:  proposals  and  results.  U.  S. 

Forest  Serv.  Forest  Prod.  Lab.  Rpt.  D1737.  1949. 


That  Mississippi  timber  is  suitable  for  many 
useful  and  marketable  products  is  partly  dem- 
onstrated by  the  number  and  variety  of  timber- 
connected  industries  operating  in  the  State — 
about  1,000  sawmills,  7 woodpulp  mills,  and 
some  100  other  plants  manufacturing  such 
items  as  veneer,  cooperage,  poles,  handle  stock, 
shuttle  blocks,  furniture  dimension,  and  char- 
coal. 

OPPORTUNITIES  FOR  FOREST  INDUSTRY 
EXPANSION 

What  about  opportunities  for  new  industrial 
development  based  upon  utilization  of  current 
timber  resources? 

Pulp  and  paper  is  presently  the  fastest  grow- 
ing segment  of  Mississippi’s  forest  industry.  In 
response  to  plant  expansion  within  the  State 
and  in  peripheral  areas,  pulpwood  production 
( mainly  pine ) has  risen  to  2 million  cords 
annually;  25  years  ago  the  State’s  output  was 
less  than  300,000  cords.  Opportunities  for 
further  increasing  the  pulpwood  cut  are  prom- 
ising. Not  only  is  pine  in  measurably  greater 
supply  today  than  it  was  a decade  ago,  but  cur- 
rent growth  is  well  in  excess  of  the  annual 
harvest.  Moreover,  a 75-percent  increase  since 
1948  in  numbers  of  pines  2 to  4 inches  in 
diameter  points  to  further  improvement  in 
pulpwood  supplies,  if  fire  protection  and  other 
essential  forestry  programs  are  continued  and 
strengthened. 

Mississippi  is  also  a top-ranking  producer 
of  southern  pine  poles.  Most  of  the  annual  pole 
harvest  is  shipped  to  the  16  pressure  treating 
plants  in  the  State.  One  recent  study  indicated 
that  more  than  two-thirds  of  the  poles  received 
at  treating  plants  in  the  South  are  16  to  35 
feet  in  length.  These  lengths  can  be  readily 
cut  from  pines  8 to  20  inches  in  diameter — 
size  classes  that  are  now  increasing  in  number 
in  Mississippi.  Nationwide,  the  number  of 
utility  poles  in  service  has  been  rising  and  is 
expected  to  increase  further.  Too,  in  recent 
years  a growing  market  has  developed  for  poles 
used  in  barns,  storage  sheds,  and  other  types 
of  structures.  Though  demand  for  poles  is 
expected  to  heighten,  it  will  probably  be  met 
by  greater  output  from  existing  firms  rather 
than  by  new  installations. 

For  the  immediate  future,  possibilities  for 
development  of  new  industry  based  upon  pri- 


2 


mary  conversion  of  sawtimber  are  obviously 
more  limited  for  hardwood  than  for  pine,  in 
view  of  the  heavy  use  already  being  made  of 
such  material.  Nevertheless  there  are  still 
localities  where  some  slack  can  be  found. 

In  the  north  Mississippi  area  embracing  Cal- 
houn, Itawamba,  Lafayette,  Lee,  Marshall, 
Tate,  Tippah,  Tishomingo,  and  Union  Counties, 
hardwood  sawtimber  volume  has  increased 
some  36  percent  since  1948.  More  than  half 
of  the  2.9  million  acres  in  these  nine  counties 
is  forested.  The  area,  which  displays  con- 
siderable physiographic  variation,  encompasses 
some  excellent  hardwood  sites  such  as  the 
brown  loam  soils  in  Lafayette,  Tate,  and  Mar- 
shall Counties,  as  well  as  the  alluvial  soils 
along  the  Cold  water,  Tallahatchie,  Yacona, 
Yalabusha,  and  other  waterways. 

The  752  thousand  acres  of  hardwood  forests 
in  the  9 counties  average  1,300  board  feet  per 
acre.  But  in  the  bottom  lands,  which  support 
two-fifths  of  the  hardwood  sawtimber,  the 
average  is  over  2,200  board  feet.  By  way  of 
contrast,  the  statewide  average  of  bottom-land 
sawtimber  volume  is  only  1,700  board  feet  per 
acre.  Of  the  1.2  billion  board  feet  of  hardwood 
sawtimber  in  the  9 counties,  44  percent  is  oak, 
27  percent  is  gum,  and  the  rest  is  mainly  in 
a variety  of  firm-textured  species  like  hickory 
and  ash. 

Hardwood  sawtimber  volume  has  also  risen 
during  the  past  decade  in  Forrest,  George, 
Greene,  Hancock,  Jackson,  Pearl  River,  Perry, 
and  Stone  Counties.  Forests  occupy  78  percent 
of  the  3 million  acres  of  land  area  in  these  8 
southeast  counties.  Hardwood  sawtimber  vol- 
ume— up  46  percent  since  1948 — now  totals  one 
billion  board  feet;  two-thirds  is  on  the  325 
thousand  acres  of  bottom-land  forests,  which 
average  2,400  board  feet  per  acre.  The  bot- 
toms are  chiefly  along  the  Pearl  and  Pasca- 
goula Rivers  and  their  tributaries. 

The  hardwood  volume  in  the  southeast  is 
predominantly  in  soft-textured  species  that  are 
suitable  for  conversion  into  veneer  as  well  as 
lumber.  Some  45  percent  of  the  volume  is  gum, 
26  percent  other  soft-textured  species,  and  29 
percent  firm-textured  species,  largely  red  oak. 

The  ownership  pattern  of  the  8-county  hard- 
wood resource  affords  an  indication  of  its 
relative  availability.  Some  9 percent  of  the 


volume  is  on  public  lands  (chiefly  national 
forest),  while  13  percent  is  on  forest  industry 
holdings,  and  78  percent  on  other  types  of 
private  ownerships.  Except  for  a somewhat 
lower  proportion  of  public  stumpage,  this  own- 
ership pattern  is  much  like  that  of  the  9-county 
area  cited  earlier. 

In  sections  where  hardwoods  are  already 
being  heavily  used,  near-term  expanion  of 
wood-using  industry  can  come  in  part  through 
more  intensive  utilization  of  the  available  raw 
material.  Where  it  can  be  done  economically, 
one  means  is  by  increasing  secondary  manu- 
facture, so  as  to  produce  more  finished  prod- 
ucts. Another  is  by  making  use  of  lower 
quality  timber  and  perhaps  of  the  leavings  of 
sawmills,  planing  mills,  and  other  plants. 

Long-range  possibilities  for  growth  in  secon- 
dary industry  appear  favorable.  The  move- 
ment, in  fact,  is  already  under  way.  Primary 
manufacturers  have  advanced  it  in  the  process 
of  diversification  and  in  undertaking  further 
manufacture  of  their  products.  Independent 
secondary  manufacture,  too,  has  expanded,  as 
witness  the  growth  of  the  furniture  industry 
at  New  Albany,  Tupelo,  Okolona,  Eupora,  Le- 
land,  Meridian,  and  elsewhere. 

In  conjunction  with  the  expansion  of  the 
State’s  furniture  industry,  the  particle-board 
market  gives  promise  of  continuing  to  grow. 
Manufacture  of  particle  board  involves  mixing 
small  fractions  of  wood  with  resins  and  com- 
pressing the  mixture  into  boards  of  various 
thicknesses.  These  boards,  which  can  be  made 
from  available  low-grade  hardwood,  are  used 
for  a number  of  purposes,  including  wall  panel- 
ling and  core  stock  for  furniture. 

Basic  to  the  security  and  expansion  of  both 
primary  and  secondary  manufacture  is  good 
management  of  the  timber  resource.  In  antici- 
pation of  greater  long-term  demand  for  timber, 
pine  management  programs  have  already  been 
expanded  and  intensified  in  many  parts  of  the 
State,  especially  on  forest-industry  lands  and 
public  holdings.  An  additional  motivation  for 
the  programs  on  industrial  ownerships  is  the 
need  for  assured  supplies  of  raw  material  to 
protect  capital  investments.  Both  public  agen- 
cies and  forest  industries  are  also  sponsoring 
programs  of  technical  assistance  to  stimulate 
forestry  on  small  ownerships.  Although  man- 
agement is  progressing  more  rapidly  in  pine 


3 


than  in  hardwoods,  educational  efforts  are 
developing  a wider  appreciation  of  the  out- 
standing opportunities  for  managing  industrial 
hardwoods  on  suitable  sites.  The  recent  in- 
crease in  demand  for  pulping  hardwoods  may 
stimulate  management  too. 

Mississippi’s  forest  soils  have  the  capacity 
to  produce  a much  greater  volume  of  wood 
than  they  are  currently  growing.  It  can  be 
reasonably  assumed  that,  with  application  of 
minimum  forestry  practices  on  all  commercial 
timberlands,  net  annual  growth  might  be  raised 
eventually  from  0.5  cord  per  acre  to  nearly 
1 cord.  This  would  permit  the  State  to  enjoy 
an  even  greater  forest  industry  than  it  now 
does.  A still  higher  average  growth  can  prob- 
ably be  attained  under  intensive  management. 
The  prescription  for  continued  forward  move- 
ment includes  minimizing  wildfire,  restocking 
idle  land,  and  removing  trees  that  have  little 
or  no  utility.  Given  good  timber  resources, 
wood-using  industry  will  thrive,  and  the  two 
will  perpetuate  each  other. 

ACCURACY  OF  THE  SURVEY 

The  data  on  forest  acreage  and  timber  volume 
in  this  report  were  secured  in  1956-57  with  a 
systematic  sampling  method  involving  a forest- 
nonforest  classification  on  aerial  photographs 
and  on-the-ground  measurements  of  trees  at 
sample  points.  The  sample  points  were  taken 
in  pairs  at  and  near  the  intersections  of  a grid 
of  lines  spaced  3 miles  apart.  Tally  trees  were 
selected  with  a 3.03  diopter  prism. 

Accuracy  of  the  estimates  may  be  affected 
by  two  types  of  errors.  The  first  stems  from 
the  use  of  a sample  to  estimate  the  whole  and 
from  variability  of  the  items  being  sampled. 
This  type  is  termed  sampling  error;  it  is  sus- 
ceptible to  a mathematical  evaluation  of  the 
probability  of  error.  The  second  type — often 
referred  to  as  reporting  or  estimating  error — 
derives  from  mistakes  in  measurement,  judg- 
ment, arithmetic,  or  recording,  and  limitations 
of  method  or  equipment.  Effects  cannot  be 
appraised  mathematically,  but  the  Forest  Sur- 
vey constantly  attempts  to  hold  such  error 
to  a minimum  by  proper  training  and  good 
supervision,  and  by  emphasis  on  careful  work. 

Statistical  analysis  of  the  data  indicates  a 
sampling  error  of  plus  or  minus  0.3  percent  for 
the  estimate  of  total  forest  area,  1.4  percent 


for  total  cubic  volume,  and  1.9  percent  for 
total  board-foot  volume.  When  acreage  and 
volume  totals  for  the  State  are  broken  down 
by  county  and  other  subdivisions  of  the  data, 
the  possibility  of  error  increases  and  is  greatest 
for  the  smallest  items.  The  order  of  this  in- 
crease is  suggested  in  the  following  tabulation, 
which  shows  the  sampling  error  to  which  the 
estimates  are  liable  two  chances  out  of  three. 


Forest  area 

Cubic  volume 

Board-foot  volume 

Size  of  area 
sampled 

Sampling 
error  1 

Volume 

sampled 

Sampling 
error  - 

Volume 

sampled 

Sampling 
error  - 

Thousand. 

Percent  Million 

Percent 

Million  Percent 

acres 

CU.  ft. 

b d.  ft. 

17,000 

0.3 

7,600 

1.4 

26,000 

1.9 

10,000 

4 

6,000 

1.6 

20,000 

2.1 

5,000 

.6 

3,000 

2.2 

10,000 

3.0 

2,000 

.9 

1,000 

3.8 

5,000 

4.3 

500 

1.8 

500 

5.5 

2,000 

6.8 

100 

3.9 

100 

12.2 

300 

17.5 

1 By  random-sampling  formula. 

- Estimated  by  use  of  a procedure  described  by  D.  B.  DeLury 
in  Values  and  Integrals  of  the  Orthogonal  Polynomials  up 
to  n = 26.  Univ.  Toronto  Press,  33  pp.  Toronto,  Ont.  1950. 

County  data  on  timber  volumes  have  been 
included  in  the  report  in  order  to  permit  adding 
counties  totalling  enough  volume  to  meet  a 
desired  degree  of  reliability.  To  obtain  an  esti- 
mate of  growing  stock  with  a sampling  error 
of  plus  or  minus  10  percent,  data  for  enough 
counties  must  be  added  together  to  total  about 
150  million  cubic  feet.  A comparable  sampling 
error  for  sawtimber  volume  requires  about 
1,000  million  board  feet. 

DEFSN9TIONS  OF  TERMS 

Forest  Land  Class 

Forest  land. — Includes:  (a)  land  which  is 
at  least  10  percent  stocked  by  trees  of  any  size 
and  capable  of  producing  timber  or  other  wood 
products,  or  of  exerting  an  influence  on  the 
climate  or  on  the  water  regime;  (b)  land  from 
which  the  trees  have  been  removed  to  less 
than  10  percent  stocking  and  which  has  not 
been  developed  for  other  use;  (c)  afforested 
areas. 

Commercial  forest  land. — Forest  land  which 
is  (a)  producing,  or  is  physically  capable  of 
producing,  usable  crops  of  wood  ( usually  saw- 
timber  ) , ( b ) economically  available  now  or 
prospectively,  and  (c)  not  withdrawn  from 
timber  utilization. 


4 


Noncommercial  forest  land. — Forest  land  ( a ) 
withdrawn  from  timber  utilization  through 
statute,  ordinance,  or  administrative  order  but 
which  otherwise  qualifies  as  commercial  forest 
land,  and  (b)  incapable  of  yielding  usable  wood 
products  (usually  sawtimber)  because  of  ad- 
verse site  conditions,  or  so  physically  inacces- 
sible as  to  be  unavailable  economically  in  the 
foreseeable  future. 

Tree  Species 

Commercial  species. — Includes  species  that 
normally  have  value  for  commercial  timber 
products;  excludes  so-called  weed  or  noncom- 
mercial species  such  as  blackjack  oak,  scrub 
post  oak,  blue  beech,  and  sourwood. 

Softwoods. — Coniferous  species,  of  which 
the  most  numerous  are  loblolly  pine  (Pinus 
taeda),  shortleaf  pine  (P.  echinata),  and  long- 
leaf  pine  (P.  palustris). 

Hardwoods. — Broadleaved  species,  of  which 
the  most  numerous  are  the  oaks  ( Quercus  spp. ) 
and  sweetgum  ( Liquidambar  styraciflua). 

Softwood  Forest  Types 

Longleaf-slash  pine. — Forests  in  which  50 
percent  or  more  of  the  stand  is  longleaf  or 
slash  pine,  singly  or  in  combination.  Common 
associates  include  other  southern  pines,  oak, 
and  gum. 

Loblolly-shortleaf  pine. — Forests  in  which 
50  percent  or  more  of  the  stand  is  loblolly  pine, 
shortleaf  pine,  or  other  southern  yellow  pines 
excepting  longleaf  or  slash  pine,  singly  or  in 
combination.  Common  associates  include  oak, 
hickory,  and  gum. 

Oak-pine. — Forests  in  which  50  percent  or 
more  of  the  stand  is  hardwoods,  usually  up- 
land oaks,  but  in  which  southern  pines  make 
up  25-49  percent  of  the  stand.  Common  asso- 
ciates include  gum,  hickory,  and  yellow-poplar. 

Hardwood  Forest  Types 

Oak-hickory. — Forests  in  which  50  percent 
or  more  of  the  stand  is  upland  oaks  or  hickory, 
singly  or  in  combination,  except  where  pines 
comprise  25-49  percent  in  which  case  the  stand 
would  be  classified  oak-pine.  Common  asso- 
ciates include  yellow-poplar,  elm,  maple,  and 
black  walnut. 

Oak-gum-cypress. — Bottom-land  forests  in 
which  50  percent  or  more  of  the  stand  is  tu- 


pelo, blackgum,  sweetgum,  oaks,  or  southern 
cypress,  singly  or  in  combination,  except  where 
pines  comprise  25-49  percent,  in  which  case 
the  stand  would  be  classified  oak-pine.  Com- 
mon associates  include  cottonwood,  willow, 
ash,  elm,  hackberry,  and  maple. 

Elm-ash-cottonwood. — Forests  in  which  50 
percent  or  more  of  the  stand  is  elm,  ash,  or 
cottonwood,  singly  or  in  combination.  Common 
associates  include  willow,  sycamore,  beech,  and 
maple. 

Diameter 

D.b.h.  (Diameter  breast  high). — Tree  dia- 
meter in  inches,  outside  bark,  measured  at 
4-M>  feet  above  ground. 

Diameter  class. — The  2-inch  diameter  classes 
extend  from  1.0  inch  below  to  0.9  inch  above 
the  stated  midpoint.  Thus,  the  12-inch  class 
takes  in  trees  11.0  inches  to  and  including  12.9 
inches  d.b.h. 

Class  of  Timber 

Sawtimber  trees. — Live  trees  of  commercial 
species,  at  least  9.0  inches  d.b.h.  in  softwoods 
and  11.0  inches  d.b.h.  in  hardwoods,  and  con- 
taining at  least  a 12-foot  merchantable  butt 
log — or,  if  the  butt  log  is  a cull,  at  least  50 
percent  of  the  gross  sawlog  volume  is  fn 
merchantable  logs.  To  be  merchantable,  a log 
must  meet  the  following  requirements: 

(a)  In  softwoods,  logs  that  have  a minimum 
6-inch  small-end  diameter  inside  bark 
and  that  are  at  least  one-third  sound, 
with  sweep  or  crook  not  exceeding  two- 
thirds  the  small-end  diameter. 

(b)  In  hardwoods,  logs  that  have  a mini- 
mum 8-inch  small-end  diameter  inside 
bark  and  that  meet  the  specifications  of 
a standard  lumber  log  or  a tie  and  tim- 
ber log. 

Poletimber  trees. — Trees  of  commercial  spe- 
cies which  meet  regional  specifications  of 
soundness  and  form,  and  which  are  of  the 
following  diameters  at  breast  height:  soft- 

woods 5.0  to  9.0  inches,  hardwoods  5.0  to  11.0 
inches.  Such  trees  will  usually  become  saw- 
timber trees  if  left  to  grow. 

Seedling  and  sapling  trees. — Live  trees  of 
commercial  species  less  than  5.0  inches  in 


5 


diameter  at  breast  height  and  of  good  form 
and  vigor. 

Cull  trees. — Live  trees  of  sawtimber  or  pole- 
timber  size  that  are  unmerchantable  for  saw- 
logs  now  or  prospectively  because  of  defect, 
rot,  or  species. 

Volume 

Sawtimber  volume. — Net  volume  in  board 
feet,  International  14-inch  rule,  of  live  saw- 
timber trees  to  a specified  merchantable  top. 

Growing  stock. — Net  volume  in  cubic  feet 
of  live  sawtimber  and  live  poletimber  trees 
from  stump  to  a minimum  4.0-inch  top  diameter 
(of  central  stem)  inside  bark. 

Miscellaneous  Definitions 

Net  annual  growth  of  sawtimber. — The 
change,  resulting  from  natural  causes,  in  net 


board-foot  volume  of  live  sawtimber  on  com- 
mercial forest  land  during  a specified  year. 

Net  annual  growth  of  growing  stock. — The 
change,  resulting  from  natural  causes,  in  net 
cubic-foot  volume  of  growing  stock  on  com- 
mercial forest  land  during  a specified  year. 

Annual  cut  of  sawtimber. — The  net  board- 
foot  volume  of  live  sawtimber  trees  cut  or 
killed  by  logging,  and  by  cultural  operations, 
on  commercial  forest  land  during  a specified 
year. 

Annual  cut  of  growing  stock. — The  net  cubic- 
foot  volume  of  live  sawtimber  and  poletimber 
trees  cut  or  killed  by  logging,  or  by  cultural 
operations,  on  commercial  forest  land  during 
a specified  year. 

Timber  products  output. — The  volume  of 
timber  products  cut  from  both  growing  stock 
and  other  sources. 


6 


Forest  Resource  Maps 


Figure  1.  Proportion  of  commercial  forest  land. 


8 


mmm 

Wm^mm 


m$m 

0m 

mwMf 


raw 

tgpigfe 

. 


MMH 


kf.'  Z--1 

Imiw# 

wfe.  I 


1 IK 


Sippe 

i*  -: 

m£&&v'k'i 


MMI 


Predominantly  softwood  types 
Predominantly  hardwood  types 


Figure  2.  Distribution  of  major  forest-type  groups 


9 


10 


Figure  3.  Change  in  commercial  forest  area  between  surveys  (1948-57 ). 


Figure  4.  Proportion  of  commercial  forest  land  in  forest  industry  ownership. 


11 


Figure  5.  Change  in  number  of  growing  stock  trees  between  surveys  (1948-57),  by  survey  region, 
species  group,  and  tree  diameter  class. 


12 


Figure  6.  Pine  sawtimber  volume. 


14 


Figure  8.  Cottonwood  sawtimber  volume. 


15 


16 


Figure  10.  White  elm  sawtimber  volume. 

17 


Each  dot  represents  an  average  of 
500,000  board  feet.  Counties  in 
which  the  volume  sampled  in  1957 
exceeded  the  1948  sample  are 
shown  in  green. 


18 


Figure  11.  Tupelo  and  blackgum  sawtimber  volume. 


' • *.  *1.  .*..••••!  • • 

. . 
P • 1 . , . • I*  , » •* 

•••••;•  • k_°  • 0 e • • , • . 


. * • I 


I • . .-v : jr  - “ 

V • -i 


* .r 


! • • • . • *.;•  • • 

•j  • 1_|  ^ ^ ^ . • , • 

.TT- 


ess®X *.  • • 

• :• ’-V  : '. : -I.  \ -Cv 


sj  •:  • , 

) < — '•  • • • 

/-F  • •• . r 

XV  • • . • • ! 


IT"*  • • . . 

. • * • . . • . •!.  . . i.  • 

. • • • • • . ; . 
•••«•••  I.  •j5' . • 

_1_4  -•/ • “ • . * * * 

• • 

r • • • • • • • • • *•  • • • • 

• i* 

•I*.::*.-  • *.  • •!  . 

C « t • » ! i • ■)*  — j— u 


Each  dot  represents  an  average  of 
500,000  board  feet.  Counties  in 
which  the  volume  sampled  in  1957 
exceeded  the  1948  sample  are 
shown  in  green. 


Figure  12.  Sweetgum  sawtimber  volume. 


19 


Each  dot  represents  an  average  of 
500,000  board  feet.  Counties  in 
which  the  volume  sampled  in  1957 
exceeded  the  1948  sample  are 
shown  in  green. 


Figure  13.  Hickory  sawtimber  volume. 


20 


21 


Figure  15.  Sweetbay  and  magnolia  sawtimber  volume. 


22 


Figure  16.  Yellow-poplar  sawtimber  volume. 


23 


I 


Figure  18.  White  oak  sawtimber  volume. 


25 


Figure  19.  Hackberry  sawtimber  volume. 

26 


Figure  20.  Sycamore  sawtimber  volume. 


27 


Figure  21.  Beech  sawtimber  volume. 


28 


Figure  22.  Hardwood,  sawtimber  volume  in  standard  factory  lumber  logs 


29 


30 


Figure  23.  Average  volume  per  acre  of  softwood  sawtimber  in  softwood  types. 


Figure  24.  Average  volume  per  acre  of  hardwood  sawtimber  in  softwood  types. 


31 


More  than  2,000  board  feet 
1,000-2,000  board  feet 
Less  than  1,000  board  feet 


32 


Figure  25.  Average  sawtimber  volume  per  acre  in  hardwood  types. 


Figure  26.  Relationship  of  growth  and  cut  of  softwood  sawtimber  volume,  1956. 


33 


34 


Figure  27.  Relationship  of  growth  and  cut  of  hardwood  sawtimber  volume,  1956. 


Figure  28.  Output  of  pine  pulpwood,  1959.  Source 


State  Tax  Commission. 


35 


Figure  29.  Output  of  industrial  softwood  products  (except  pulpwood),  1959.  Source:  State  Tax 
Commission. 


36 


Figure  30.  Output  of  hardwood  pulpwood,  1959.  Source:  State  Tax  Commission. 


37 


Figure  31.  Output  of  industrial  hardwood  products  (except  pulpwood),  1959.  Source:  State  Tax 
Commission. 


38 


Tables 


Table  2.  Growing  stock  volume  by  species  group  and  county 


County 

All 

species 

Softwood 

Soft 

hardwood 

Hard 

hardwooc 

i 

Total 

j Pine  | 

Other 

Total 

Gum 

Other  1 

Total 

Oak 

Other  2 

Million  cubic  feet 

Adams 

116.6 

29.4 

29.4 

34.6 

13.7 

20.9 

52.6 

26.6 

26.0 

Alcorn 

42.1 

9.6 

9.0 

.6 

9.3 

5.1 

4.2 

23.2 

16.2 

7.0 

Amite 

129.8 

85.7 

85.5 

.2 

11.3 

9.5 

1.8 

32.8 

27.6 

5.2 

Attala 

68.8 

22.1 

21.0 

1.1 

22.6 

19.0 

3.6 

24.1 

15.2 

8.9 

Benton 

60.4 

21.7 

21.6 

.1 

11.8 

7.6 

4.2 

26.9 

19.0 

7.9 

Bolivar 

60.1 

7.7 

7.7 

33.0 

6.7 

26.3 

19.4 

5.3 

14.1 

Calhoun 

76.2 

32.9 

32.9 

13.5 

12.0 

1.5 

29.8 

21.9 

7.9 

Carroll 

67.0 

4.0 

4.0 

23.4 

19.3 

4.1 

39.6 

27.2 

12.4 

Chickasaw 

32.4 

13.5 

13.5 

3.0 

3.0 

15.9 

12.4 

3.5 

Choctaw 

59.1 

30.6 

30.6 

12.5 

9.7 

2.8 

16.0 

13.3 

2.7 

Claiborne 

129.4 

12.8 

12.2 

.6 

49.8 

29.8 

20.0 

66.8 

28.7 

38.1 

Clarke 

188.9 

126.6 

126.3 

.3 

25.7 

20.9 

4.8 

36.6 

27.3 

9.3 

Clay 

73.5 

4.4 

4.1 

3 

9.2 

7.1 

2.1 

59.9 

44.8 

15.1 

Coahoma 

50.8 

1.3 

1.3 

14.1 

2.3 

11.8 

35.4 

5.5 

29.9 

Copiah 

174.6 

94.9 

94.5 

.4 

33.5 

27.9 

5.6 

46.2 

29.0 

17.2 

Covington 

61.2 

15.5 

15.5 

29.0 

21.6 

7.4 

16.7 

10.4 

6.3 

De  Soto 

43.2 

1.6 

1.6 

15.8 

11.3 

4.5 

25.8 

10.9 

14.9 

Forrest 

82.2 

58.1 

58.1 

16.2 

10.4 

5.8 

7.9 

6.0 

1.9 

Franklin 

191.8 

134.5 

134.5 

19.7 

15.2 

4.5 

37.6 

23.0 

14.6 

George 

125.3 

75.3 

71.8 

3.5 

31.6 

16.9 

14.7 

18.4 

9.7 

8.7 

Greene 

141.0 

84.5 

83.6 

.9 

27.7 

19.6 

8.1 

28.8 

24.0 

4.8 

Grenada 

51.2 

16.2 

15.8 

.4 

14.9 

14.5 

.4 

20.1 

10.5 

9.6 

Hancock 

74.4 

43.6 

43.3 

.3 

27.8 

20.3 

7.5 

3.0 

3.0 

Harrison 

123.4 

96.4 

96.4 

23.0 

10.1 

12.9 

4.0 

1.2 

2.8 

Hinds 

82.6 

15.2 

14.5 

.7 

25.2 

18.9 

6.3 

42.2 

25.0 

17.2 

Holmes 

82.1 

21.6 

20.8 

.8 

26.0 

18.0 

8.0 

34.5 

24.1 

10.4 

Humphreys 

35.8 

6.1 

6.1 

29.7 

24.7 

5.0 

Issaquena 

84.0 

3.1 

3.1 

15.1 

5.1 

10.0 

65.8 

24.1 

41.7 

Itawamba  r 

76.8 

22.0 

21.9 

.1 

22.8 

15.5 

7.3 

32.0 

16.8 

15.2 

Jackson 

159.9 

90.3 

86.3 

4.0 

55.5 

44.9 

10.6 

14.1 

9.8 

4.3 

Jasper 

191.2 

113.7 

111.9 

1.8 

41.0 

29.7 

11.3 

36.5 

19.8 

16.7 

Jefferson 

165.9 

101.3 

63.4 

37.9 

28.7 

17.9 

10.8 

35.9 

16.8 

19.1 

Jefferson  Davis 

62.4 

23.6 

23.6 

21.5 

16.1 

5.4 

17.3 

10.8 

6.5 

Jones 

115.4 

64.2 

64.2 

22.0 

11.3 

10.7 

29.2 

22.9 

6.3 

Kemper 

143.9 

69.3 

68.2 

1.1 

42.7 

39.9 

2.8 

31.9 

20.7 

11.2 

Lafayette 

117.5 

38.9 

38.8 

.1 

21.2 

17.8 

3.4 

57.4 

45.1 

12.3 

Lamar 

109.9 

76.5 

76.5 

21.5 

9.3 

12.2 

11.9 

9.5 

2.4 

Lauderdale 

163.5 

91.7 

91.7 

26.3 

21.1 

5.2 

45.5 

30.1 

15.4 

Lawrence 

96.7 

43.6 

43.6 

14.1 

12.0 

2.1 

39.0 

26.2 

12.8 

Leake 

95.5 

52.4 

52.3 

.1 

15.6 

13.5 

2.1 

27.5 

24.8 

2.7 

Lee 

14.4 

5.2 

5.2 

1.5 

.7 

.8 

7.7 

4.9 

2.8 

Leflore 

31.0 

9.3 

9.3 

21.7 

10.6 

11.1 

40 


Table  2.  Growing  stock  volume  by  species  group  and  county  (Continued) 


County 

All 

species 

Softwood 

Soft 

hardwood 

Hard 

hardwood 

Total 

Pine 

Other 

Total 

Gum 

Other  1 

Total 

Oak  | 

Other  2 

Million  cubic  feet 

Lincoln 

112.1 

54.2 

53.8 

.4 

22.0 

12.7 

9.3 

35.9 

23.0 

12.9 

Lowndes 

52.3 

11.1 

6.2 

4.9 

15.1 

12.3 

2.8 

26.1 

14.7 

11.4 

Madison 

75.5 

23.9 

22.5 

1.4 

16.4 

13.5 

2.9 

35.2 

20.9 

14.3 

Marion 

128.2 

59.6 

59.6 

25.2 

20.1 

5.1 

43.4 

29.6 

13.8 

Marshall 

73.5 

12.8 

11.3 

1.5 

29.2 

14.1 

15.1 

31.5 

23.6 

7.9 

Monroe 

79.7 

20.8 

20.8 

21.3 

18.1 

3.2 

37.6 

26.9 

10.7 

Montgomery 

36.9 

14.5 

14.5 

6.0 

5.8 

.2 

16.4 

12.1 

4.3 

Neshoba 

135.4 

56.2 

56.2 

40.6 

36.9 

3.7 

38.6 

30.0 

8.6 

Newton 

89.8 

37.2 

37.2 

16.4 

13.0 

3.4 

36.2 

26.3 

9.9 

Noxubee 

102.8 

52.6 

52.3 

.3 

9.3 

9.3 

40.9 

29.1 

11.8 

Oktibbeha 

58.0 

25.7 

24.1 

1.6 

3.1 

2.4 

.7 

29.2 

23.8 

5.4 

Panola 

33.7 

.7 

.7 

14.0 

10.4 

3.6 

19.0 

11.5 

7.5 

Pearl  River 

156.2 

91.0 

91.0 

53.6 

24.3 

29.3 

11.6 

9.7 

1.9 

Perry 

152.4 

113.4 

112.9 

.5 

22.5 

17.0 

5.5 

16.5 

14.5 

2.0 

Pike 

77.7 

25.0 

25.0 

20.5 

18.7 

1.8 

32.2 

23.9 

8.3 

Pontotoc 

38.7 

14.2 

14.2 

4.5 

4.3 

.2 

20.0 

10.0 

10.0 

Prentiss 

31.8 

8.0 

7.9 

.1 

6.9 

6.0 

.9 

16.9 

13.4 

3.5 

Quitman 

24.6 

1.8 

1.8 

11.2 

8.4 

2.8 

11.6 

5.0 

6.6 

Rankin 

188.0 

81.7 

78.9 

2.8 

27.0 

25.7 

1.3 

79.3 

57.3 

22.0 

Scott 

140.3 

100.7 

100.7 

14.7 

13.5 

1.2 

24.9 

17.6 

7.3 

Sharkey 

49.0 

2.5 

2.5 

9.9 

9.6 

.3 

36.6 

23.7 

12.9 

Simpson 

94.7 

41.3 

41.3 

19.3 

17.4 

1.9 

34.1 

23.3 

10.8 

Smith 

132.0 

81.8 

81.8 

24.4 

20.7 

3.7 

25.8 

20.7 

5.1 

Stone 

100.7 

61.6 

60.3 

1.3 

28.7 

13.0 

15.7 

10.4 

9.9 

.5 

Sunflower 

8.6 

2.6 

2.6 

.6 

.6 

5.4 

4.7 

.7 

Tallahatchie 

46.6 

8.5 

4.7 

3.8 

11.5 

11.5 

26.6 

18.0 

8.6 

Tate 

33.4 

.1 

.1 

14.7 

11.9 

2.8 

18.6 

4.7 

13.9 

Tippah 

51.3 

14.7 

14.7 

9.8 

7.1 

2.7 

26.8 

19.5 

7.3 

Tishomingo 

79.9 

39.2 

39.2 

17.0 

12.1 

4.9 

23.7 

17.4 

6.3 

Tunica 

59.5 

2.5 

2.5 

30.6 

3.2 

27.4 

26.4 

4.0 

22.4 

Union 

55.7 

19.3 

19.3 

18.4 

12.8 

5.6 

18.0 

11.9 

6.1 

Walthall 

48.8 

14.6 

12.4 

2.2 

24.9 

18.6 

6.3 

9.3 

7.3 

2.0 

Warren 

153.5 

6.3 

3.9 

2.4 

67.9 

33.8 

34.1 

79.3 

38.2 

41.1 

Washington 

55.3 

.5 

.5 

27.4 

7.8 

19.6 

27.4 

10.3 

17.1 

Wayne 

199.6 

134.5 

134.5 

24.3 

17.6 

6.7 

40.8 

31.4 

9.4 

Webster 

42.4 

18.8 

18.8 

5.7 

4.6 

1.1 

17.9 

13.1 

4.8 

Wilkinson 

215.5 

124.7 

116.1 

8.6 

27.9 

23.9 

4.0 

62.9 

25.3 

37.6 

Winston 

154.2 

62.8 

62.8 

33.2 

29.1 

4.1 

58.2 

43.5 

14.7 

Yalobusha 

49.0 

12.2 

11.7 

.5 

9.2 

6.3 

2.9 

27.6 

23.1 

4.5 

Yazoo 

119.8 

4.2 

1.5 

2.7 

38.6 

28.0 

10.6 

77.0 

37.4 

39.6 

All  counties 

7,589.0 

3,313.3 

3,198.6 

114.7 

1,752.6 

1,216.1 

536.5 

2,523.1 

1,595.7 

927.4 

1 Includes  cottonwood,  willow,  yellow-poplar,  and  the  like. 

2 Includes  ash,  hickory,  sycamore,  and  the  like. 


41 


Table  3.  Growing  stock  volume  by  diameter  group  and  county 


County 

All 

species 

Softwood 

Soft  hardwood 

Hard  hardwood 

Total 

6-12 

inches 

14  inches 
and  up 

Total 

6-12 

inches 

14  inches 
and  up 

Total 

6-12 

inches 

14  inches 
and  up 

Million  cubic  feet 

Adams 

116.6 

29.4 

6.6 

22.8 

34.6 

10.6 

24.0 

52.6 

17.9 

34.7 

Alcorn 

42.1 

9.6 

7.7 

1.9 

9.3 

5.2 

4.1 

23.2 

16.7 

6.5 

Amite 

129.8 

85.7 

43.0 

42.7 

11.3 

8.2 

3.1 

32.8 

19.7 

13.1 

Attala 

68.8 

22.1 

18.4 

3.7 

22.6 

14.4 

8.2 

24.1 

13.2 

10.9 

Benton 

60.4 

21.7 

19.0 

2.7 

11.8 

8.1 

3.7 

26.9 

21.4 

5.5 

Bolivar 

60.1 

7.7 

2.3 

5.4 

33.0 

8.1 

24.9 

19.4 

8.7 

10.7 

Calhoun 

76.2 

32.9 

29.5 

3.4 

13.5 

6.1 

7.4 

29.8 

14.9 

14.9 

Carroll 

67.0 

4.0 

3.3 

.7 

23.4 

16.3 

7.1 

39.6 

19.1 

20.5 

Chickasaw 

32.4 

13.5 

10.0 

3.5 

3.0 

2.4 

.6 

15.9 

11.4 

4.5 

Choctaw 

59.1 

30.6 

24.4 

6.2 

12.5 

9.3 

3.2 

16.0 

13.9 

2.1 

Claiborne 

129.4 

12.8 

7.1 

5.7 

49.8 

11.6 

38.2 

66.8 

28.2 

38.6 

Clarke 

188.9 

126.6 

77.6 

49.0 

25.7 

17.0 

8.7 

36.6 

24.5 

12.1 

Clay 

73.5 

4.4 

2.9 

1.5 

9.2 

7.3 

1.9 

59.9 

37.1 

22.8 

Coahoma 

50.8 

1.3 

1.3 

14.1 

6.1 

8.0 

35.4 

15.1 

20.3 

Copiah 

174.6 

94.9 

34.2 

60.7 

33.5 

19.5 

14.0 

46.2 

22.8 

23.4 

Covington 

61.2 

15.5 

7.5 

8.0 

29.0 

14.3 

14.7 

16.7 

7.7 

9.0 

De  Soto 

43.2 

1.6 

.6 

1.0 

15.8 

9.3 

6.5 

25.8 

12.2 

13.6 

Forrest 

82.2 

58.1 

43.3 

14.8 

16.2 

10.3 

5.9 

7.9 

3.8 

4.1 

Franklin 

191.8 

134.5 

63.0 

71.5 

19.7 

13.3 

6.4 

37.6 

18.6 

19.0 

George 

125.3 

75.3 

43.9 

31.4 

31.6 

20.6 

11.0 

18.4 

10.7 

7.7 

Greene 

141.0 

84.5 

47.6 

36.9 

27.7 

15.1 

12.6 

28.8 

18.4 

10.4 

Grenada 

51.2 

16.2 

10.2 

6.0 

14.9 

6.9 

8.0 

20.1 

11.3 

8.8 

Hancock 

74.4 

43.6 

32.9 

10.7 

27.8 

21.4 

6.4 

3.0 

2.1 

.9 

Harrison 

123.4 

96.4 

74.4 

22.0 

23.0 

13.5 

9.5 

4.0 

3.2 

.8 

Hinds 

82.6 

15.2 

9.8 

5.4 

25.2 

12.7 

12.5 

42.2 

22.9 

19.3 

Holmes 

82.1 

21.6 

16.3 

5.3 

26.0 

9.5 

16.5 

34.5 

13.7 

20.8 

Humphreys 

35.8 

6.1 

3.6 

2.5 

29.7 

9.3 

20.4 

Issaquena 

84.0 

3.1 

.3 

2.8 

15.1 

1.6 

13.5 

65.8 

21.0 

44.8 

Itawamba 

76.8 

22.0 

20.2 

1.8 

22.8 

12.5 

10.3 

32.0 

18.8 

13.2 

Jackson 

159.9 

90.3 

63.2 

27.1 

55.5 

19.3 

36.2 

14.1 

4.7 

9.4 

Jasper 

191.2 

113.7 

55.0 

58.7 

41.0 

19.4 

21.6 

36.5 

19.3 

17.2 

Jefferson 

165.9 

101.3 

32.0 

69.3 

28.7 

11.2 

17.5 

35.9 

17.4 

18.5 

Jefferson  Davis 

62.4 

23.6 

14.9 

8.7 

21.5 

17.5 

4.0 

17.3 

8.9 

8.4 

Jones 

115.4 

64.2 

38.8 

25.4 

22.0 

17.7 

4.3 

29.2 

17.5 

11.7 

Kemper 

143.9 

69.3 

44.0 

25.3 

42.7 

37.4 

5.3 

31.9 

21.4 

10.5 

Lafayette 

117.5 

38.9 

26.0 

12.9 

21.2 

11.5 

9.7 

57.4 

20.3 

37.1 

Lamar 

109.9 

76.5 

50.1 

26.4 

21.5 

11.9 

9.6 

11.9 

8.1 

3.8 

Lauderdale 

163.5 

91.7 

69.9 

21.8 

26.3 

20.2 

6.1 

45.5 

33.1 

12.4 

Lawrence 

96.7 

43.6 

31.2 

12.4 

14.1 

7.7 

6.4 

39.0 

21.3 

17.7 

Leake 

95.5 

52.4 

40.9 

11.5 

15.6 

12.1 

3.5 

27.5 

19.0 

8.5 

Lee 

14.4 

5.2 

1.7 

3.5 

1.5 

.8 

.7 

7.7 

3.8 

3.9 

Leflore 

31.0 

9.3 

4.0 

5.3 

21.7 

8.3 

13.4 

42 


Table  3.  Growing  stock  volume  by  diameter  group  and  county  (Continued) 


County 

All 

species 

Softwood 

Soft  hardwood 

Hard  hardwood 

Total 

6-12 

inches 

14  inches 
and  up 

Total 

6-12 

inches 

14  inches 
and  up 

Total 

6-12 

inches 

14  inches 
and  up 

Million  cubic  jeet 

Lincoln 

112.1 

54.2 

24.5 

29.7 

22.0 

11.3 

10.7 

35.9 

17.2 

18.7 

Lowndes 

52.3 

11.1 

5.0 

6.1 

15.1 

10.7 

4.4 

26.1 

18.8 

7.3 

Madison 

75.5 

23.9 

10.7 

13.2 

16.4 

7.9 

8.5 

35.2 

19.0 

16.2 

Marion 

128.2 

59.6 

31.3 

28.3 

25.2 

13.6 

11.6 

43.4 

24.8 

18.6 

Marshall 

73.5 

12.8 

7.0 

5.8 

29.2 

15.9 

13.3 

31.5 

11.0 

20.5 

Monroe 

79.7 

20.8 

9.0 

11.8 

21.3 

16.3 

5.0 

37.6 

26.5 

11.1 

Montgomery 

36.9 

14.5 

9.8 

4.7 

6.0 

5.6 

.4 

16.4 

8.6 

7.8 

Neshoba 

135.4 

56.2 

38.0 

18.2 

40.6 

27.5 

13.1 

38.6 

22.3 

16.3 

Newton 

89.8 

37.2 

30.8 

6.4 

16.4 

11.3 

5.1 

36.2 

16.5 

19.7 

Noxubee 

102.8 

52.6 

30.2 

22.4 

9.3 

8.0 

1.3 

40.9 

28.2 

12.7 

Oktibbeha 

58.0 

25.7 

11.1 

14.6 

3.1 

2.7 

.4 

29.2 

21.6 

7.6 

Panola 

33.7 

.7 

.7 

14.0 

7.4 

6.6 

19.0 

8.1 

10.9 

Pearl  River 

156.2 

91.0 

57.1 

33.9 

53.6 

30.5 

23.1 

11.6 

6.4 

5.2 

Perry 

152.4 

113.4 

70.6 

42.8 

22.5 

16.3 

6.2 

16.5 

9.9 

6.6 

Pike 

77.7 

25.0 

18.4 

6.6 

20.5 

9.7 

10.8 

32.2 

12.9 

19.3 

Pontotoc 

38.7 

14.2 

12.2 

2.0 

4.5 

2.8 

1.7 

20.0 

15.4 

4.6 

Prentiss 

31.8 

8.0 

7.8 

.2 

6.9 

5.1 

1.8 

16.9 

12.2 

4.7 

Quitman 

24.6 

1.8 

1.8 

11.2 

2.6 

8.6 

11.6 

6.8 

4.8 

Rankin 

188.0 

81.7 

49.8 

31.9 

27.0 

18.3 

8.7 

79.3 

40.8 

38.5 

Scott 

140.3 

100.7 

61.4 

39.3 

14.7 

8.5 

6.2 

24.9 

17.5 

7.4 

Sharkey 

49.0 

2.5 

2.5 

9.9 

1.9 

8.0 

36.6 

9.3 

27.3 

Simpson 

94.7 

41.3 

19.9 

21.4 

19.3 

14.5 

4.8 

34.1 

23.8 

10.3 

Smith 

132.0 

81.8 

59.7 

22.1 

24.4 

19.6 

4.8 

25.8 

18.9 

6.9 

Stone 

100.7 

61.6 

36.5 

25.1 

28.7 

19.8 

8.9 

10.4 

6.8 

3.6 

Sunflower 

8.6 

2.6 

.7 

1.9 

.6 

.6 

5.4 

4.2 

1.2 

Tallahatchie 

46.6 

8.5 

6.9 

1.6 

11.5 

4.1 

7.4 

26.6 

9.0 

17.6 

Tate 

33.4 

.1 

.1 

14.7 

6.4 

8.3 

18.6 

13.1 

5.5 

Tippah 

51,3 

14.7 

14.1 

.6 

9.8 

6.3 

3.5 

26.8 

16.2 

10.6 

Tishomingo 

79.9 

39.2 

30.4 

8.8 

17.0 

8.2 

8.8 

23.7 

14.5 

9.2 

Tunica 

59.5 

2.5 

.2 

2.3 

30.6 

5.9 

24.7 

26.4 

8.4 

18.0 

Union 

55.7 

19.3 

16.2 

3.1 

18.4 

12.3 

6.1 

18.0 

9.2 

8.8 

Walthall 

48.8 

14.6 

8.2 

6.4 

24.9 

13.6 

11.3 

9.3 

6.4 

2.9 

Warren 

153.5 

6.3 

1.8 

4.5 

67.9 

20.3 

47.6 

79.3 

25.2 

54.1 

Washington 

55.3 

.5 

.5 

27.4 

7.4 

20.0 

27.4 

9.7 

17.7 

Wayne 

199.6 

134.5 

85.7 

48.8 

24.3 

18.1 

6.2 

40.8 

29.8 

11.0 

Webster 

42.4 

18.8 

16.6 

2.2 

5.7 

4.4 

1.3 

17.9 

14.0 

3.9 

Wilkinson 

215.5 

124.7 

52.2 

72.5 

27.9 

15.9 

12.0 

62.9 

24.0 

38.9 

Winston 

154.2 

62.8 

41.5 

21.3 

33.2 

16.6 

16.6 

58.2 

35.9 

22.3 

Yalobusha 

49.0 

12.2 

7.7 

4.5 

9.2 

7.0 

2.2 

27.6 

17.0 

10.6 

Yazoo 

119.8 

4.2 

1.6 

2.6 

38.6 

14.3 

24.3 

77.0 

25.4 

51.6 

Total 

7,589.0 

3,313.3 

2,009.1 

1,304.2 

1,752.6 

954.1 

798.5 

2,523.1 

1,326.7 

1,196.4 

43 


Table  4.  Sawtimber  volume  by  species  group  and  county 


County 

All 

species 

Softwood 

Soft 

hardwood 

Hard 

hardwood 

Total 

Pine 

Other 

Total 

Gum 

Other  1 

Total 

Oak 

Other  : 

Adams 

493.2 

155.2 

155.2 

141.7 

47.4 

94.3 

196.3 

106.6 

89.7 

Alcorn 

102.5 

21.1 

17.2 

3.9 

31.0 

15.0 

16.0 

50.4 

36.1 

14.3 

Amite 

501.8 

394.6 

394.6 

23  0 

19.0 

4.0 

84.2 

70.9 

13.3 

Attala 

160.3 

50.9 

45.2 

5.7 

43.7 

34.8 

8.9 

65.7 

44.5 

21.2 

Benton 

147.3 

78.0 

78.0 

24.6 

13.8 

10.8 

44.7 

38.9 

5.8 

Bolivar 

240.7 

39.7 

39.7 

143.3 

28.3 

115.0 

57.7 

17.4 

40.3 

Calhoun 

234.6 

92.1 

92.1 

48.7 

39.6 

9.1 

93.8 

71.7 

22.1 

Carroll 

176.8 

7.5 

7.5 

44.7 

37.8 

6.9 

124.6 

84.0 

40.6 

Chickasaw 

72.1 

44.3 

44  3 

2.9 

2.9 

24.9 

19.8 

5.1 

Choctaw 

140.7 

91.7 

91.7 

28.1 

16.7 

11.4 

20.9 

18.0 

2.9 

Claiborne 

501.8 

56.6 

53.8 

2.8 

220.3 

121.8 

98.5 

224.9 

111.6 

113.3 

Clarke 

735.9 

597.5 

596.0 

1.5 

65.5 

50.3 

15.2 

72.9 

46.0 

26.9 

Clay 

192.5 

19.6 

18.0 

1.6 

15.7 

15.7 

157.2 

116.9 

40.3 

Coahoma 

173.6 

6.5 

6.5 

49.0 

3.4 

45.6 

118.1 

13.9 

104.2 

Copiah 

701.7 

480.2 

479.4 

.8 

86.7 

68.6 

18.1 

134.8 

92.8 

42.0 

Covington 

201.3 

63.7 

63.7 

85.5 

57.5 

28.0 

52.1 

28.8 

23.3 

De  Soto 

130.3 

5.6 

5.6 

41.8 

32.8 

9.0 

82.9 

36.1 

46.8 

Forrest 

280.2 

221.1 

221.1 

37.4 

22.7 

14.7 

21.7 

18.6 

3.1 

Franklin 

768.7 

606.4 

606  4 

45.9 

25.6 

20.3 

116.4 

67.4 

49.0 

George 

430.2 

299.2 

281.4 

17.8 

87.9 

37.0 

50.9 

43.1 

18.4 

24.7 

Greene 

545.7 

377.1 

372.5 

4 6 

89.3 

73.1 

16.2 

79.3 

65.6 

13.7 

Grenada 

154.2 

51.3 

51.3 

52.0 

52.0 

50.9 

28.2 

22.7 

Hancock 

220.8 

166.4 

166.4 

49.6 

33.3 

16.3 

4.8 

4.8 

Harrison 

422.1 

352.5 

352.5 

63.8 

22.8 

41.0 

5.8 

2.9 

2.9 

Hinds 

258.3 

63.4 

61.4 

2.0 

78.0 

56.4 

21.6 

116.9 

78.3 

38.6 

Holmes 

275.6 

78.2 

75.5 

2.7 

90.1 

62.1 

28.0 

107.3 

78.6 

28.7 

Humphreys 

110.6 

16.2 

16.2 

94.4 

76.6 

17.8 

Issaquena 

308.5 

16.2 

16.2 

69.5 

22.7 

46.8 

222.8 

82.1 

140.7 

Itawamba 

192.3 

40.3 

39.9 

.4 

77.6 

53.7 

23.9 

74.4 

31.3 

43.1 

Jackson 

623.5 

349.8 

325.7 

24.1 

218.8 

174.0 

44.8 

54.9 

40.3 

14.6 

Jasper 

755.5 

512.2 

501.9 

10.3 

147.0 

93.0 

54.0 

96.3 

48.3 

48.0 

Jefferson 

717.7 

521.2 

310.6 

210.6 

102.0 

54.6 

47.4 

94.5 

41.3 

53.2 

Jefferson  Davis 

177.3 

79.3 

79.3 

48.4 

35.5 

12.9 

49.6 

26.5 

23.1 

Jones 

367.2 

260.6 

260.6 

33.6 

28.3 

5.3 

73.0 

52.9 

20.1 

Kemper 

380.2 

255.6 

255.6 

58.7 

56.4 

2.3 

65.9 

38.7 

27.2 

Lafayette 

430.5 

162.8 

162.8 

61.7 

55.1 

6.6 

206.0 

160.1 

45.9 

Lamar 

388.8 

318.4 

318.4 

52.4 

19.5 

32.9 

18.0 

11.3 

6.7 

Lauderdale 

454.2 

323.7 

323.7 

49.0 

40.2 

8.8 

81.5 

49.1 

32.4 

Lawrence 

295.9 

144.4 

144.4 

34.8 

30.0 

4.8 

116.7 

61.4 

55.3 

Leake 

234.8 

155.3 

155.3 

33.6 

29.7 

3.9 

45.9 

40.3 

5.6 

Lee 

51.5 

24.3 

24.3 

3.0 

1.7 

1.3 

24.2 

16.9 

7.3 

Leflore 

80.0 

21.3 

21.3 

58.7 

27.5 

31.2 

Lincoln 

418.5 

245.8 

244.3 

1.5 

70.0 

39.1 

30.9 

102.7 

58.9 

43.8 

Lowndes 

128.5 

47.6 

24.7 

22.9 

31.4 

25.4 

6.0 

49.5 

25.0 

24.5 

44 


Table  4.  Sawtimber  volume  by  species  group  and  county  (Continued) 


County 

All 

species 

Softwood 

Soft 

hardwood 

Hard 

hardwood 

Total 

Pine  [ 

Other 

Total 

Gum 

Other  1 

Total  | 

Oak 

Other  2 

Million  board  feet 

Madison 

268.5 

112.9 

107.1 

5.8 

51.7 

45.4 

6.3 

103.9 

69.8 

34.1 

Marion 

474.7 

271.2 

271.2 

86.7 

67.4 

19.3 

116.8 

78.9 

37.9 

Marshall 

257.2 

49.1 

43.8 

5.3 

88.2 

47.1 

41.1 

119.9 

98.4 

21.5 

Monroe 

185.8 

85.3 

85.3 

29.1 

27.1 

2.0 

71.4 

48.5 

22.9 

Montgomery 

96.4 

48.5 

48.5 

4.1 

4.1 

43.8 

29.1 

14.7 

Neshoba 

471.2 

220.2 

220.2 

120.5 

113.5 

7.0 

130.5 

103.3 

27.2 

Newton 

245.7 

100.2 

100.2 

44.4 

33.2 

11.2 

101.1 

69.7 

31.4 

Noxubee 

342.7 

233.0 

231.5 

1.5 

9.3 

9.3 

100.4 

69.2 

31.2 

Oktibbeha 

162.0 

117.0 

111.8 

5.2 

2.5 

2.5 

42.5 

34.1 

8.4 

Panola 

89.5 

1.0 

1.0 

31.9 

24.7 

7.2 

56.6 

36.4 

20.2 

Pearl  River 

556.2 

412.6 

412.6 

117.9 

43.0 

74.9 

25.7 

20.6 

5.1 

Perry 

565.6 

482.7 

479.9 

2.8 

43.3 

38.5 

4.8 

39.6 

32.6 

7.0 

Pike 

242.6 

86.4 

86.4 

56.2 

50.3 

5.9 

100.0 

69.4 

30.6 

Pontotoc 

101.3 

53.8 

53.8 

6.9 

6.9 

40.6 

20.8 

19.8 

Prentiss 

53.6 

11.7 

11.7 

10.4 

8.8 

1.6 

31.5 

26.6 

4.9 

Quitman 

77.4 

11.5 

11.5 

36.2 

25.6 

10.6 

29.7 

10.4 

19.3 

Rankin 

597.7 

314.2 

297.1 

17.1 

51.1 

49.1 

2.0 

232.4 

160.2 

72.2 

Scott 

471.4 

369.8 

369.8 

49.2 

49.2 

52.4 

38.1 

14.3 

Sharkey 

167.8 

11.7 

11.7 

33.9 

33.9 

122.2 

86.1 

36.1 

Simpson 

312.1 

182.5 

182.5 

51.0 

48.9 

2.1 

78.6 

59.7 

18.9 

Smith 

347.7 

270.4 

270.4 

33.9 

29.9 

4.0 

43.4 

34.1 

9.3 

Stone 

360.6 

265.9 

261.3 

4.6 

71.7 

30.3 

41.4 

23.0 

22.1 

.9 

Sunflower 

26.1 

15.1 

15.1 

2.2 

2.2 

8.8 

8.8 

Tallahatchie 

145.7 

28.7 

18.3 

10.4 

38.1 

38.1 

78.9 

49.6 

29.3 

Tate 

80.3 

48.4 

34.7 

13.7 

31.9 

4.7 

27.2 

Tippah 

105.9 

27.4 

27.4 

23.6 

19.0 

4.6 

54.9 

42.1 

12.8 

Tishomingo 

263.1 

138.5 

138.5  ' 

54.8 

43.2 

11.6 

69.8 

52.4 

17.4 

Tunica 

252.5 

14.3 

14.3 

145.4 

10.0 

135.4 

92.8 

7.2 

85.6 

Union 

145.4 

57.3 

57.3 

42.0 

24.2 

17.8 

46.1 

33.7 

12.4 

Walthall 

156.3 

72.1 

58.2 

13.9 

68.7 

56.5 

12.2 

15.5 

11.4 

4.1 

Warren 

597.3 

30.7 

24.4 

6.3 

286.6 

125.9 

160.7 

280.0 

136.3 

143.7 

Washington 

206.8 

2.5 

2.5 

109.5 

30.1 

79.4 

94.8 

38.4 

56.4 

Wayne 

732.5 

598.2 

598.2 

59.5 

44.9 

14.6 

74.8 

53.5 

21.3 

Webster 

99.3 

63.1 

63.1 

8.8 

1.-8 

7.0 

27.4 

25.2 

2.2 

Wilkinson 

869.1 

588.1 

545.2 

42.9 

78.5 

68.4 

10.1 

202.5 

84.6 

117.9 

Winston 

524.2 

261.3 

261.3 

111.1 

90.7 

20.4 

151.8 

119.1 

32.7 

Yalobusha 

107.1 

32.9 

31.9 

1.0 

10.0 

8.2 

1.8 

64.2 

54.4 

9.8 

Yazoo 

409.0 

17.7 

6.7 

11.0 

116.3 

84.3 

32.0 

275.0 

129.8 

145.2 

All  counties 

25,546.7 

13,537.4 

12,972.3 

565.1 

5,052.8 

3,253.0 

1,799.8 

6,956.5 

4,274.6 

2,681.9 

1 Includes  cottonwood,  willow,  yellow-poplar,  and  the  like. 

2 Includes  ash,  hickory,  sycamore,  and  the  like. 


45 


Table  5.  Sawtimber  volume  by  diameter  group  and  county 


County 

All 

species 

Softwood 

Soft  hardwood 

Hard  hardwood 

Total 

10-14 

inches 

16  inches 
and  up 

Total 

12-14 

inches 

16  inches 
and  up 

Total 

12-14 

inches 

16  inches 
and  up 

Million  board  feet 

Adams 

493.2 

155.2 

45.7 

109.5 

141.7 

20.6 

121.1 

196.3 

63.2 

133.1 

Alcorn 

102.5 

21.1 

17.2 

3.9 

31.0 

20.8 

10.2 

50.4 

30.7 

19.7 

Amite 

501.8 

394.6 

190.6 

204.0 

23.0 

17.6 

5.4 

84.2 

35.8 

48.4 

Attala 

160.3 

50.9 

40.1 

10.8 

43.7 

20.9 

22.8 

65.7 

38.7 

27.0 

Benton 

147.3 

78.0 

78.0 

24.6 

13.1 

11.5 

44.7 

31.9 

12.8 

Bolivar 

240.7 

39.7 

12.5 

27.2 

143.3 

23.1 

120.2 

57.7 

11.8 

45.9 

Calhoun 

234.6 

92.1 

83.8 

8.3 

48.7 

30.5 

18.2 

93.8 

35.4 

58.4 

Carroll 

176.8 

7.5 

5.2 

2.3 

44.7 

31.6 

13.1 

124.6 

51.9 

72.7 

Chickasaw 

72.1 

44.3 

26.5 

17.8 

2.9 

1.1 

1.8 

24.9 

13.8 

11.1 

Choctaw 

140.7 

91.7 

65.5 

26.2 

28.1 

23.3 

4.8 

20.9 

17.1 

3.8 

Claiborne 

501.8 

56.6 

23.6 

33.0 

220.3 

60.6 

159.7 

224.9 

101.6 

123.3 

Clarke 

735.9 

597.5 

382.2 

215.3 

65.5 

42.2 

23.3 

72.9 

36.1 

36.8 

Clay 

192.5 

19.6 

16.3 

3.3 

15.7 

8.0 

7.7 

157.2 

93.4 

63.8 

Coahoma 

173.6 

6.5 

2.2 

4.3 

49.0 

22.3 

26.7 

118.1 

36.8 

81.3 

Copiah 

701.7 

480.2 

129.6 

350.6 

86.7 

41.9 

44.8 

134.8 

46.4 

88.4 

Covington 

201.3 

63.7 

32.6 

31.1 

85.5 

38.8 

46.7 

52.1 

25.2 

26.9 

De  Soto 

130.3 

5.6 

2.5 

3.1 

41.8 

17.3 

24.5 

82.9 

35.2 

47.7 

Forrest 

280.2 

221.1 

159.6 

61.5 

37.4 

22.7 

14.7 

21.7 

12.0 

9.7 

Franklin 

768.7 

606.4 

307.8 

298.6 

45.9 

15.6 

30.3 

116.4 

54.6 

61.8 

George 

430.2 

299.2 

202.3 

96.9 

87.9 

42.8 

45.1 

43.1 

18.4 

24.7 

Greene 

545.7 

377.1 

252.9 

124.2 

89.3 

50.3 

39.0 

79.3 

38.4 

40.9 

Grenada 

154.2 

51.3 

30.4 

20.9 

52.0 

29.8 

22.2 

50.9 

18.3 

32.6 

Hancock 

220.8 

166.4 

125.6 

40.8 

49.6 

36.6 

13.0 

4.8 

4.8 

Harrison 

422.1 

352.5 

274.0 

78.5 

63.8 

31.0 

32.8 

5.8 

4.1 

1.7 

Hinds 

258.3 

63.4 

39.3 

24.1 

78.0 

48.7 

29.3 

116.9 

48.6 

68.3 

Holmes 

275.6 

78.2 

64.0 

14.2 

90.1 

20.3 

69.8 

107.3 

49.3 

58.0 

Humphreys 

110.6 

... 

16.2 

5.0 

11.2 

94.4 

24.1 

70.3 

Issaquena 

308.5 

16.2 

1.3 

14.9 

69.5 

6.7 

62.8 

222.8 

45.7 

177.1 

Itawamba 

192.3 

40.3 

36.5 

3.8 

77.6 

34.1 

43.5 

74.4 

37.2 

37.2 

Jackson 

623.5 

349.8 

274.6 

75.2 

218.8 

67.4 

151.4 

54.9 

18.4 

36.5 

Jasper 

755.5 

512.2 

280.4 

231.8 

147.0 

57.7 

89.3 

96.3 

44.4 

51.9 

Jefferson 

717.7 

521.2 

212.8 

308.4 

102.0 

40.4 

61.6 

94.5 

25.2 

69.3 

Jefferson  Davis 

177.3 

79.3 

48.4 

30.9 

48.4 

35.9 

12.5 

49.6 

24.6 

25.0 

Jones 

367.2 

260.6 

156.1 

104.5 

33.6 

29.6 

4.0 

73.0 

47.7 

25.3 

Kemper 

380.2 

255.6 

160.5 

95.1 

58.7 

47.3 

11.4 

65.9 

35.4 

30.5 

Lafayette 

430.5 

162.8 

125.0 

37.8 

61.7 

25.2 

36.5 

206.0 

65.1 

140.9 

Lamar 

388.8 

318.4 

235.4 

83.0 

52.4 

30.2 

22.2 

18.0 

7.2 

10.8 

Lauderdale 

454.2 

323.7 

274.4 

49.3 

49.0 

34.2 

14.8 

81.5 

54.9 

26.6 

Lawrence 

295.9 

144.4 

102.8 

41.6 

34.8 

26.0 

8.8 

116.7 

44.4 

72.3 

Leake 

234.8 

155.3 

99.5 

55.8 

33.6 

27.6 

6.0 

45.9 

19.4 

26.5 

Lee 

51.5 

24.3 

7.5 

16.8 

3.0 

3.0 

24.2 

11.8 

12.4 

Leflore 

80.0 

21.3 

3.3 

18.0 

58.7 

15.3 

43.4 

46 


Table  5.  Sawtimber  volume  by  diameter  group  and  county  (Continued) 


County 

All 

species 

Softwood 

Soft  hardwood 

Hard  hardwood 

Total 

10-14 

inches 

16  inches 
and  up 

Total 

12-14 

inches 

16  inches 
and  up 

Total 

12-14 

inches 

16  inches 
and  up 

Million  board  jeet 

Lincoln 

418.5 

245.8 

115.8 

130.0 

70.0 

45.0 

25.0 

102.7 

42.2 

60.5 

Lowndes 

128.5 

47.6 

21.8 

25.8 

31.4 

19.4 

12.0 

49.5 

29.4 

20.1 

Madison 

268.5 

112.9 

69.0 

43.9 

51.7 

11.0 

40.7 

103.9 

52.1 

51.8 

Marion 

474.7 

271.2 

170.6 

100.6 

86.7 

50.4 

36.3 

116.8 

48.1 

68.7 

Marshall 

257.2 

49.1 

31.3 

17.8 

88.2 

41.6 

46.6 

119.9 

49.1 

70.8 

Monroe 

185.8 

85.3 

36.2 

49.1 

29.1 

21.9 

7.2 

71.4 

48.2 

23.2 

Montgomery 

96.4 

48.5 

27.7 

20.8 

4.1 

4.1 

43.8 

25.4 

18.4 

Neshoba 

471.2 

220.2 

184.4 

35.8 

120.5 

83.9 

36.6 

130.5 

66.6 

63.9 

Newton 

245.7 

100.2 

81.0 

19.2 

44.4 

29.5 

14.9 

101.1 

36.2 

64.9 

Noxubee 

342.7 

233.0 

155.3 

77.7 

9.3 

9.3 

100.4 

60.6 

39.8 

Oktibbeha 

162.0 

117.0 

64.4 

52.6 

2.5 

2.5 

42.5 

15.2 

27.3 

Panola 

89.5 

1.0 

1.0 

31.9 

10.8 

21.1 

56.6 

21.5 

35.1 

Pearl  River 

556.2 

412.6 

341.0 

71.6 

117.9 

60.2 

57.7 

25.7 

6.0 

19.7 

Perry 

565.6 

482.7 

286.9 

195.8 

43.3 

30.4 

12.9 

39.6 

24.3 

15.3 

Pike 

242.6 

86.4 

56.8 

29.6 

56.2 

14.8 

41.4 

100.0 

37.4 

62.6 

Pontotoc 

101.3 

53.8 

48.4 

5.4 

6.9 

6.9 

40.6 

24.3 

16.3 

Prentiss 

53.6 

11.7 

10.8 

.9 

10.4 

10.4 

31.5 

17.6 

13.9 

Quitman 

77.4 

11.5 

11.5 

36.2 

11.3 

24.9 

29.7 

13.3 

16.4 

Rankin 

597.7 

314.2 

191.7 

122.5 

51.1 

17.0 

34.1 

232.4 

103.1 

129.3 

Scott 

471.4 

369.8 

217.6 

152.2 

49.2 

39.7 

9.5 

52.4 

34.2 

18.2 

Sharkey 

167.8 

11.7 

11.7 

33.9 

11.3 

22.6 

122.2 

24.2 

98.0 

Simpson 

312.1 

182.5 

108.9 

73.6 

51.0 

35.1 

15.9 

78.6 

53.1 

25.5 

Smith 

347.7 

270.4 

182.5 

87.9 

33.9 

20.2 

13.7 

43.4 

22.8 

20.6 

Stone 

360.6 

265.9 

173.5 

92.4 

71.7 

48.6 

23.1 

23.0 

11.9 

11.1 

Sunflower 

26.1 

15.1 

2.3 

12.8 

2.2 

2.2 

8.8 

4.8 

4.0 

Tallahatchie 

145.7 

28.7 

25.7 

3.0 

38.1 

20.3 

17.8 

78.9 

16.9 

62.0 

Tate 

80.3 

48.4 

22.8 

25.6 

31.9 

18.5 

13.4 

Tippah 

105.9 

27.4 

27.4 

23.6 

5.1 

18.5 

54.9 

28.3 

26.6 

Tishomingo 

263.1 

138.5 

102.7 

35.8 

54.8 

31.4 

23.4 

69.8 

37.8 

32.0 

Tunica 

252.5 

14.3 

3.7 

10.6 

145.4 

39.7 

105.7 

92.8 

18.7 

74.1 

Union 

145.4 

57.3 

57.3 

42.0 

31.2 

10.8 

46.1 

23.8 

22.3 

Walthall 

156.3 

72.1 

38.5 

33.6 

68.7 

47.4 

21.3 

15.5 

5.4 

10.1 

Warren 

597.3 

30.7 

4.3 

26.4 

286.6 

76.6 

210.0 

280.0 

79.2 

200.8 

Washington 

206.8 

2.5 

.9 

1.6 

109.5 

26.0 

83.5 

94.8 

19.7 

75.1 

Wayne 

732.5 

598.2 

420.0 

178.2 

59.5 

40.6 

18.9 

74.8 

42.7 

32.1 

Webster 

99.3 

63.1 

52.0 

11.1 

8.8 

4.1 

4.7 

27.4 

15.2 

12.2 

Wilkinson 

869.1 

588.1 

264.3 

323.8 

78.5 

38.6 

39.9 

202.5 

53.4 

149.1 

Winston 

524.2 

261.3 

181.3 

80.0 

111.1 

48.9 

62.2 

151.8 

87.4 

64.4 

Yalobusha 

107.1 

32.9 

14.9 

18.0 

10.0 

6.5 

3.5 

64.2 

36.3 

27.9 

Yazoo 

409.0 

17.7 

5.3 

12.4 

116.3 

31.4 

84.9 

275.0 

66.6, 

208,4. 

Total  25,546.7 

13,537.4 

8,402.4 

5,135.0 

5,052.8 

2,300.8 

2,752.0 

6,956.5 

2,895.8 

4,060.7 

47 


Table  6.  Land  area  and  commercial  forest  by  county 


County 

All  land 

Adams 

Thousand 

acres 

286.7 

Alcorn 

259.2 

Amite 

466.6 

Attala 

463.4 

Benton 

263.7 

Bolivar 

586.9 

Calhoun 

369.2 

Carroll 

408.3 

Chickasaw 

323.8 

Choctaw 

266.9 

Claiborne 

311.0 

Clarke 

446.1 

Clay 

265.0 

Coahoma 

364.8 

Copiah 

499.9 

Covington 

266.2 

De  Soto 

283.5 

Forrest 

300.2 

Franklin 

363.5 

George 

307.8 

Greene 

465.9 

Grenada 

251.0 

Hancock 

310.4 

Harrison 

374.4 

Hinds 

561.3 

Holmes 

489.0 

Humphreys 

262.4 

Issaquena 

265.6 

Itawamba 

346.2 

Jackson 

476.2 

Jasper 

437.1 

Jefferson 

332.8 

Jefferson  Davis 

265.0 

Jones 

451.8 

Kemper 

484.5 

Lafayette 

387.8 

Lamar 

320.0 

Lauderdale 

461.4 

Lawrence 

277.1 

Leake 

375.0 

Lee 

291.2 

Leflore 

376.3 

Commercial  forest 


Thousand 

acres 

Percent 

216.8 

75.6 

134.3 

51.8 

304.2 

65.2 

276.4 

59.6 

174.7 

66.2 

107.7 

18.4 

209.1 

56.6 

213.5 

52.3 

150.4 

46.4 

185.6 

69.5 

223.5 

71.9 

332.5 

74.5 

121.0 

45.7 

94.1 

25.8 

338.4 

67.7 

149.1 

56.0 

74.7 

26.3 

210.4 

70.1 

288.2 

79.3 

251.5 

81.7 

390.4 

83.8 

165.8 

66.1 

249.3 

80.3 

285.4 

76.2 

241.9 

43.1 

222.9 

45.6 

101.0 

38.5 

160.7 

60.5 

226.7 

65.5 

380.2 

79.8 

288.1 

65.9 

231.4 

69.5 

145.2 

54.8 

300.5 

66.5 

332.3 

68.6 

236.3 

60.9 

248.3 

77.6 

329.9 

71.5 

192.0 

69.3 

224.4 

59.8 

88.4 

30.4 

94.3 

25.1 

County 

All  land 

Commercial  forest 

Thousand 

Thousand 

acres 

acres 

Percent 

Lincoln 

375.0 

234.4 

62.5 

Lowndes 

325.1 

144.4 

44.4 

Madison 

480.6 

197.6 

41.1 

Marion 

352.0 

239.4 

68.0 

Marshall 

443.6 

184.7 

41.6 

Monroe 

492.2 

264.7 

53.8 

Montgomery 

257.9 

154.0 

59.7 

Neshoba 

363.5 

199.6 

54.9 

Newton 

371.2 

226.1 

60.9 

Noxubee 

444.8 

214.4 

48.2 

Oktibbeha 

290.6 

150.8 

51.9 

Panola 

436.5 

135.3 

31.0 

Pearl  River 

530.0 

348.7 

65.8 

Perry 

417.9 

327.6 

78.4 

Pike 

262.4 

142.0 

54.1 

Pontotoc 

320.6 

143.1 

44.6 

Prentiss 

267.5 

137.0 

51.2 

Quitman 

263.7 

64.3 

24.4 

Rankin 

512.0 

359.9 

70.3 

Scott 

393.6 

253.8 

64.5 

Sharkey 

279.0 

132.1 

47.3 

Simpson 

375.7 

252.8 

67.3 

Smith 

410.9 

258.0 

62.8 

Stone 

286.7 

247.2 

86.2 

Sunflower 

443.5 

49.3 

11.1 

Tallahatchie 

412.2 

150.7 

36.6 

Tate 

245.1 

68.7 

28.0 

Tippah 

297  0 

162.4 

54.7 

Tishomingo 

288.6 

195.2 

67.6 

Tunica 

293.1 

91.4 

31.2 

Union 

270.1 

122.5 

45.4 

Walthall 

257.9 

133.6 

51.8 

Warren 

362.2 

233.2 

64.4 

Washington 

465.9 

108.3 

23.2 

Wayne 

529.3 

434.6 

82.1 

Webster 

266.2 

176.5 

66.3 

Wilkinson 

432.0 

328.3 

76.0 

Winston 

387.8 

244.2 

63.0 

Yalobusha 

282.9 

184.2 

65.1 

Yazoo 

600.4 

307.1 

51.1 

All  counties 

30,152.3 

17,193.6 

57.0 

48 


1022378477