Skip to main content

Full text of "Mass soil movements in the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest"

See other formats


Historic, Archive Document 


Do not assume content reflects current scientific knowledge, 
policies, or practices. 


oa 


“MASS SOIL MOVEMENTS 
“IN THE HJ. ANDREWS 


EXPERIMENTAL FOREST -} 
A C. 1. DYRNESS | 


U.S. DEPT OF AGRICULTURE 
MATIONAL RG RICUETURAL LIBR ARY 


OCT 5- 6/ 


= tam 


CURRENT SERIAL RECORDS 


1 p/ 


PACIFIC NORTHWEST we 
FOREST. AND=RAMGE EXPERIMENT STATION. + 7/5 

qh. > \U.S=DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

U.S. FOREST SERVICE Research Paper PNW— 42), 


5967, I 


PESDOP ECBO SOLS RO BODS LE ES LEP BOKE DS EE ES BORO GODS EO DPBS BOR 


CONTENTS 
Page 
LINE BUG) DNOKO BPI KOWN ae eh a A SNS a) le 1 
STUDY AREA. : . . ° . : . . . ° ° 1 
ALISO D) SyIOURIWAL Gis : : : Sumner. Go hoy) Moe a 1 
METHODS . . . . . . : . . : : . . 2, 
RESULTS . 4 . . . 5 . . . . . . ° 2 
Mass movements by morphological class . 2 
Mass movement by mode of action 
Or GistuT Da NGem eas) Fe whee iene ae inter tues 4 
Relationship between mass movements 
and certain site characteristics. . .- 9 
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS . . - - « 12 


SRPSKA SL SEDS AF SEAL SF OG OF SF SHOF AKLEOQPSFLF DS SFOBARAGAR 


INTRODUCTION 


Each winter a number of mass 
soil movements, such as earthflows 
and slumps, occur in the Coast Ranges 
and Cascades of western Oregon. 
These movements, generally occurring 
during periods of heavy and prolonged 
rainfall, often disrupt roads and dam- 
age other improvements. Some, how- 
ever, remain undiscovered in remote, 
undisturbed areas. 


During the winter of 1964-65, 
there was an unusually large number 
of mass soil movements in western 
Oregon. <A high proportion of these 
movements occurred during the severe 
storm that struck northern California 
and Oregonthe week before Christmas. 
Soon after this storm, it was found 
that the H. J. Andrews Experimental 
Forest was in one of the hardest hit 
areas and was in an excellent location 
for an intensive survey of stormdam- 
age with emphasis on the origin of 
large mass soil movements. Accord- 
ingly, asurvey of allmass movements 
in the Experimental Forest was initia- 


ted April 1 and concluded July 1,1965. 


The study had several aims: 

(1) to completely describe and photo- 
graph all major movement areas in 
the Andrews so that changes in the 
future may be followed and documented, 
(2) to identify the types of movement 
which had occurred and estimate the 
amount of damage to the site and/or 
improvements, (3) to attempt to de- 
fine the relationship between the mass 
soil movement and (a) amount of man's 
disturbance and (b) certain site factors 
such as geology, soil, elevation, and 
aspect. 


STUDY AREA 


Wine ele aig GMalchaxe ws IDagoKsigi 
mental Forest comprises the entire 
15,000-acre drainage of Lookout 
Creek, located approximately 40 miles 
east of Eugene, Oreg., and part of the 
Willamette National Forest. The area 
lies within the Western * Cascades 
physiographic province and is pre- 
dominantly mature topography with 
sharp ridges and steep slopes. Bed- 
rock in the area is made up of pyro- 
clastics (tuffs and breccias) and basic 
igneous rocks (basalt and andesite). 
Forest cover is comprised of old- 
growth Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga 
menztesitt) , with varying amounts of 
western hemlock (Tfsuga heterophylla) 
and western redcedar (Thuja plicata). 


THE STORM 


Fredriksen has described the 
characteristics of the 1964 Christmas 
storm in the H. J. Andrews area in 
some detail. < At lower elevations, 
more than 13 inches of rain in 4 days 
was supplemented by an undetermined 
amount of snowmelt. This storm has 
generally been classified as an event 
with a 50-year return period. How- 
ever, Fredriksen pointed out that in 


ay 
Berntsien, (‘Carl Min 7 and 
Rothacher, Jiacks A guide sto: the Hi: 
J. Andrews Experimental Forest. 
Pacific Northwest Forest & .Range 
IDe§5 Sus}. Glas 4 aUllwiso aOao. 


gy Fredriksen, R. L. Christ- 
mas storm damage on the H. J. 
Andrews Experimental Forest. U.S. 
Forest Serv. Res. Note PNW-29, 11 
Dido wikis, MYOS. 


only 12 years of record at the Experi- 
mental Forest, this was the second 
storm to total more than 13 inches of 
precipitation within a 4-day period. 
He concluded, "we believe 4-day 
storms which deliver 13 inches are 
probably not unusual.'' The fact re- 
mains, however, that this storm 
caused the most extensive damage re- 
corded establishment of the 
Experimental Forest in 1948. 


since 


METHODS 


Information recorded at each 
soil movement site included type and 
specifics characteristics of @ soil) tox 
debris movement, general character- 
istics of the area, and assessment of 
factors influencing the soil or debris 
movement. Photographs were also 
taken at each site and a sketch made 
showing the outstanding features. An 
attempt was made to find and describe 
all events where 100 cubic yards or 


more of soil or debris were involved. 


RESULTS 


Descriptions of 47 mass move- 
ment events were made in the Andrews 
INope@mis (blero 1h))s Estimated 
ranged from 100 to 75, 000 cubic yards, 
and the total quantity of material 
moved was about 347, 800 cubic yards. 


sizes 


Mass movements 


by morphological class 


The movements have been 
grouped into 10 classes on the basis 
of their morphological characteristics 
(table 1). Earthflows occur when the 
soil becomes saturated, and pore- 
water pressure builds up to such an 
extent that the soil mass flows out in 
a generally tongue- shaped form. 
Slumps, generally occur in 
saturated soils; however, they ane 
characterized by rotational movement 


and spoon - shaped 


also, 


failure planes. 


Table 1.--Mass movements occurring on the H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest 


during the winter of 1964-65, by morphological class 


Morphological class 


Earthflow 

Slump with earthflow 

Slump 

Earthflow causing channel scour 
Slump causing channel scour 

Debris slide causing channel scour 
Channel scour 

Roadfill washout 

Avalanche with rilling 

Debris avalanche with earthflow 


Total 


Events Material moved 


Cubic yards 


104,600 
14,525 
4,050 
82,350 
106,300 
7,500 
26,300 
1,050 
100 
1,000 


PrRwWWNH FU WN © 


> 
—N 


347,775 


“SJUSAD JUBWBAOW SSDUWI fo uol{D50] bulmoys #S94104 [Osuauiadxy smMaJIpUuYy f ‘H out f° dow--'| ainbig 


dVW LNAWSAOW IOS SSVW 


 ® 
® 
® 
® 
® 
0} 
Onno é 
® ©) ® 
@ 
© ® o ® 
(OO) ® 
® © 
® 
® © © 3® 
® 
® 
® 
o) 
® 
® 
> ® 
© O) 
© 
@ 
@ @ SE OU ERED 
@ ®© ——<—eoororrr* SW3LSAS JOVNIVEO 
@® ~~ —-——- —- SUVSL 


pe oe SOSHSUTLYM TIvWwSs 


o~.., =~ §3NI1 UNOLNOD 1004-008 
c7~=7) SH18VONNOE LINN 1D ¥¥319 
S08 


LssHO0d TVLNAWISd XS 
SMAHYHONY "HH 


Channel scouring is generally caused 
by massive and sudden failure of the 
entire unconsolidated mantle, most 
often in areas of the oversteepened 
drainage heads. Debris avalanches 
involve the sudden downslope move- 
ment of largely rock material in steep 
terrain. The earthflow, slump, and 
avalanche classes are defined by 
Eckel. 2/ 


Earthflows were the most com- 
mon class of soil movement with 18 
out of the total 47 events falling within 
this class (table 1). Channel scouring 
events ranked second with a total of 
14. Only three of these events were 
confined entirelyto the drainage chan- 
nel; the remainder were triggered by 
a separate mass movement which fre- 
quently began at a road. The third 
most commonly occurring movement 
class was the slump with some earth- 
flow characteristics. Soil material 
which has slumped down, when satu- 


rated with water, will frequently flow 
out at the toe and may travel a great 
distance downslope. Only three slump 
events were completely devoid of flow 
characteristics. These were backslope 
slumps where the material came to 
rest on the road surface. 


A consideration of amounts of 
material moved emphasizes the im- 
portance of earthflow and channel 
scouring events (table 1). The re- 
maining forms of movement contrib- 
uted very little to the total amount of 
material moved. 


Mass movement by mode of 


action or disturbance 


Mass movements on the 
Andrews were also classified accord- 
ing to type of disturbance or mode of 
action (table 2), with attention focused 
on the source area of the event. For 


Table 2.--Mass movements occurring on the H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest 


during the winter of 1964-65, by mode of action or disturbance 


Type of disturbance 


Roadfill failure 

Road backslope failure 

Road backslope and fill failure 
Events caused by road drainage water 
Road removed by stream 

Events in logged areas 

Events in undisturbed areas 


Total 


3/ 


— Eckel, Edwin B., ed. Landslides and engineering practice. High- 
way Res. Board Spec. Rep. 29, 232 pp., tlws.. Washington) Dr Grasse 


Events Material moved 
Number Cubic yards 
1b) 40,900 
5 14,400 
6 38,325 
8 86,450 
3 4,350 
8 227, le) 

5 141,200 
47 347,775 


when a channel scouring 


example, 
event originated in an untouched stand 
of timber, itwas classifiedas a move- 
ment occurring in an undisturbed area 
even though at adownstream location, 


roads may have been severely damaged. 


Although only five events oc- 
curred in undisturbed areas, this type 
contained the largest volume of mate- 
rial. Events caused by road drainage 
water ranked second, with the other 
five types far behind. Each class is 


considered separately below: 


1. Roadfill failure. 


The most common single type 
of mass movement on the Andrews 
was the roadfill failure (12 events) 
(fig. 2). Thisis apparently a rather 
simple type of movement caused 


by the saturation of the roadfill 
embankment. Most of the fill ma- 
terials, especially those derived 


from pyroclastics, appear to flow 
readily when saturated. As nearly 
Asp mCouldsuber wdetermuned,) sthese 
failures were not due to improper 
rather, were 
large 


road drainage but, 
caused by’ the unusually 
amounts of rainfall or perhaps by 


improper fill compaction. 


2. Road backslope failure. 


This isa common event, which 
frequently results in road blockage 
Gaige'S) kn inhie ss tanlunensmost |oLten 
takes the form ofa slump, but the 
slump material may have 
earthflow characteristics near the 


some 


toe. Themost failure-prone back- 
slopes were those constructed in 
areas of deep, well-weathered tuffs 
and breccias. These 
materials fail easily when exces- 
If failures did occur 
inareas of andesite or basalt parent 
material, invariably the local bed- 
rock was highly fractured. Like 
the majority of other mass move- 


saprolitic 


sively moist. 


ment events, backslope siumapis 
occur only when the mantle is satu- 
rated and are also more common 
inareas where mass movement has 


occurred repeatedly in the past. 


Figure 3.--Backslope failure in an area 
of soil derived from andesite 


colluvium. 


Figure 2.--Roadfill failure in the 
H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest. 


3 


Road backslope slump causing fill 
failure. 


Six events in the Andrews fit 
within this type (fig. 4). In effect, 
this is a ''chain reaction''! with the 
follows: A 
portion of the backslope becomes 
saturated and slumps down onto the 
road surface, thus blocking the in- 
side drainage ditch. 


general sequence as 


The drainage 
water is then diverted across the 
road surface and down onto the fill 
slope from the outside portion of 
the road. The fill slope becomes 
saturated with water and an earth- 
flow type of movement follows, en- 
croaching to a varying extent onto 
the road surface. In some cases, 
the ''chain''is further lengthened by 
the fact that the earthflow on the 
fill slope may trigger channel scour- 
ing in a drainage below. 


Mass movement caused by concen- 
tration of road drainage water. 


Thereare twoclasses ofevents 
under this heading: (a) those due to 
the concentration of road drainage 
water, even though the road drain- 
age system was apparently function- 
ing properly (fig. 5), and (b) those 


caused by failure of some portion- 


of the drainage system--for exam- 
ple, a clogged, culvertion inside 
ditch. 


Events caused by concentration 
ole road) jidrainagemmavatek. our 


events in the Andrews fall. within 
this category. In ~all™ cases, ‘the 
event was associated with stream 
channel scouring. The typical se- 
quence was as follows: Extremely 
large quantities of water flowing 
from aculvert completely saturated 
the soil mantle below the road. In 


mostcases, this saturatedarea was 


Figure 4.--View of typical backslope slump 
which has also caused roadfill! failure. 


near the head of a tributary drain- 
age. When the soil became satu- 
rated, the entire mantle either 
slumped or flowed downslope and 
temporarily blocked the drainage 
channel. When a sufficient head of 
water was built up, this temporary 
dam breached, and a wall of water 
and debris rushed down the channel 
removing everything in its path. 
The endresult was adrainage chan- 
nel from which virtually all uncon- 
solidated material has been remov- 
ed exposing bare rock. 


All four events of this type 
occurred in areas of hard, frac- 
tured, greenish breccias and tuffs. 


Figure 5.--Soil movement at the head of a drainage 
caused by high flows through the culvert and 
inadequate energy dissipation at the outlet end. 


Events caused by failures in 
the road drainage system. --Of four 


of these events in the Andrews, 
three were 200 to 500 cubic yards 
in size, while the fourth involved 
approximately 75,000 cubic yards 
of material. In every case, these 
failures occurred in areas of deeply 
weathered tuffs and breccias. All 
were flow-or slump-type movements 
of roadfill or sidecast material, 
none of which resulted in channel 
scouring. In these cases, the con- 
centration of water resulting in the 
necessary saturation came from the 
clogging of aculvert or inside ditch 
(fig. 6). These blockages had grave 
consequences because of the tremen- 
dous volumes of water diverted onto 
the roadfill or sidecast materials. 


Road removed or damaged by 
stream. 


In three cases, culverts carry- 
WAS jo wmEiboMENL Org shiny S i iaalaliy is Oooh 
streams failed either because of 
inadequate size or, more probably, 
because they became blocked by 
debris (fig. 7). Asa result, roads 
were completely washed out or 
were severely damaged. 


Figure 7.--Debris which blocked the culvert and 


caused several feet of material to be deposited 
on the road surface. (Road, in foreground, has 
been repaired.) 


Figure 6.--Massive roadfill failure caused by 
blockage of road drainage ditch. 


SM SNP ON 


y 


6. 


Mass movement events in logged 
areas. 


The eight mass movement 
events in logged-over areas were 
principally earthflows (fig. 8), al- 
though two also had some slump 
characteristics. They ranged in 
size from 150 to 9,500 cubic yards 
of material. Four ofthe movements 
occurred inareas which gave ample 
evidence of considerable mass soil 
movement in the past (i.e., very 
uneven, hummocky relief). The 
remaining four were on smooth, 
steep slopes. In two cases, where 
the movements occurred at the 
heads of drainages, there was ex- 
tensive channel scouring. 


Althoughthese movements took 
placein disturbed, logged areas, in 
every case it is impossible to say 
whether the logging per se caused 
the instability. It is probably safe 
to assume that at least one or two 
of them would have occurred even 
if the area had not been logged. 


Mass movement events in undis- 
turbed areas. 


Of five mass movement events 
in completely undisturbed areas, 
all were connected with channel 
scouring (fig. 9), but three alsohad 
earthflow characteristics at the 
source area. Size of these move- 
ments ranged from 200 to 75,000 
cubic yards--four were among the 
largest slides that occurred on the 
Andrews. The average for all five 
events was well over 28,000 cubic 
yards. 


Figure 9.--Channel scour event in 


undisturbed timber. 


Figure 8.--Massive earthflow in recently logged area. 


With one exception, these 
events constituted failures at the 
heads of drainages. These areas 
are often very steep and unstable 
due to the headward erosion of the 
stream channel. When these areas 
become completely saturated, the 
weight of water adds to the driving 
force and at the same time de- 
creases the strength of the soil. 
Sudden, massive failures frequently 
Result bhwts es) uncdoubtedly,) thie 
normal course of geologic erosion 
in this area, and there is little that 
man can do to forestall events of 
this type. 


Relationship between mass movements 


and certain site characteristics 


The influence of roads on mass 
movements inthe Andrews is clearly 
indicated in table 3. Although over 72 
percent of the mass movements 
occurred in connection with roads, 
only 1.8 percent of the total area of 
the forest is in road rights-of-way. 
On the other hand, only about 11 per- 
cent of the events occurred in undis- 
turbed areas. Since 84.6 percent of 
the total area is undisturbed, this is 
far less than would be expected if the 
events occurred in a random manner. 


In the western Cascades, it has 
been observed that mass soil move- 
ments occur much more frequently in 
areas of pyroclastic rocks (tuffs and 
breccias) than in areas wherethe bed- 
TOE 1S, COladyoirigsecl VOR) lyeiseule 9 ee 
andesite. It has also beennoted else-- 
where that greenish tuffs andbreccias 
are more unstable than are their red- 
dishcounterparts. Theserelationships 
are borne out by the data presented in 
table 3. About 94 percent of the 
events occurred in areas with a tuff 


and/or breccia substratum, even 
though only 37 percent of the total area 
is made up of these rocks. Moreover, 
64 percent of the mass movements 
were on greenish tuffs and breccias 
which make up only 8 percent of the 
total area--clearly indicating the un- 
stable nature of these materials. Al- 
though about 63 percent of the area is 
underlain by basalt and andesite mate- 
rials, only 6.4 percent of the mass 
movement events occurred there. 


When soil series in the move- 
ment area are considered, the rela- 
tionship described above still holds 
but to a lesser extent. Eighty-seven 
percent of the events occurred in 
areas of soilfromtuffs and breccias-- 
the breakdown being almost 49 percent 
on soils from reddish tuffs and brec- 
cias and 38 percent ‘on ‘soul's from 
greenish tuffs and breccias. The 
apparent discrepancy between these 
figures and those for the substratum 
reported above may be attributed to 
the fact that many soils have been 
formed in transported parent mate- 
rials and oftenthere is little relation- 
ship between the soil profile and the 
substratum. It was noted in several 
cases that the discontinuity between 
the soil profile and the underlying 
bedrock constituted the failure plane, 
probably due to inherent weakness and 
water flowing through the zone. 


Elevational range in the An- 
drews Experimental Forest is approx- 
imately 1, 400-5, 300 feet. All but two 
of the mass movements occurred at 
elevations below 2,900 feet (fig. 10). 
The great bulk of the events (over 72 
percent) occurred in the elevational 
range from 2,000 to 2,600 feet (table 
3). There are two possible reasons 
for the lack of mass movements at 
high elevations: (1) Most of the de- 
posits of tuffs and breccias occur at 


pp eS eee 


Table 3.--Relationship between occurrence of mass movement events and certain site factors 


in the H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest during winter of 1964-65 


Site factors 


Disturbance: 
Undisturbed 
Logging 
Road construction 


Substratum in movement area: 
Greenish tuffs and breccias 
Reddish tuffs and breccias 
Andesite colluvium 
Basalt and andesite residuum 


Soil series: 


Soils from reddish tuffs and breccias 


Frissel Series 
McKenzie River Series 


Soils from greenish tuffs and breccias 


Limberlost Series 
Budworm Series 
Slipout Series 
Soil from andesite colluvium 
Carpenter Series 
Rock land 


Elevation (feet): 
1,400-1,700 
1,700-2 ,000 
2,000-2, 300 
2 ,300-2 ,600 
2,600-2,900 
2,900-3,200 
Over 3,200 


Slope (percent): 

0-15 

15-30 

30-45 

45-60 

60-75 

75-90 

Over 90 


Aspect: 
North 
Northeast 
East 
Southeast 
South 
Southwest 
West 
Northwest 
Level 


10 


Mass movement 
events 


NO 
Ke} 
kr W OO CO 


Ww 
[ee 
Mwmnwwawo 


KH 
NO 
=50N 


p= 

j=) 

° e ee 
rPreortrOWNe- 


Events per 
1,000 acres 


----------- ---- Number ---- 
84.6 0.4 
13.6 3.9 

1.8 N29) 
8.0 25.0 
29.2 342 
42.7 3 
20.1 3 
22.8 14.2 
C58} 9.3 
355) 4.9 
9.1 BoP 
Goel 19.5 
3.0 4.4 
2.0 1343 
34.9 9 
4.1 1.6 
Pest 7255) 
6.2 4.3 
8.8 11.4 
10.9 11.6 
ibsyoal 3.0 
10.9 6 
47.4 1 
5.9 ieee 
25.2 0) 
34.6 133} 
22.8 5.0 
8.4 11.9 
Dies) 18.7 
-6 0 
16.8 6 
5.0 9.3 
5)q8) 4.5 
11.4 Arey; 
11.9 6) 
16.8 8 
9.9 Grell! 
19.3 4.1 
3.0 DS 


lower elevations; (2) temperatures 
prevailing above 3, 000 feet at the time 
of the December storm may have been 
low enough to maintain some snow 
cover. 


As would be expected, steep- 
ness of slope and frequency of slides 
were apparently positively correlated 
(table 3). Only about a sixth of the 
events occurred on slopes with a gra- 
dient of less than 45 percent (fig. 10). 


For some reason, mass movements 
were almost nonexistent on slopes 
with a south or southwest aspect-- 
probably because rock weathering and 
soil formation proceeds much more 
slowly on the drier aspects. The re- 
sulting shallow soils and less deeply 
weathered rocks may give rise to a 
greaterdegreeof stability. It appears 
that mass soil movements occur more 
readily inareas of deep soilsand well- 
weathered bedrock. 


20 Figure 10.--Relationship between number of mass movement events and 


number of events 
i) w pS ui a | © ive) (=) 


N NE E SE 


Ss SW WNW 


aspect 


elevation, aspect, and slope. 


ml 


L 
< 


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS 


Mass soil movements are the 
end result of acombination of causative 
factors. In our area, these generally 
include soil materials of low internal 
strength, sufficient water for satura- 
tion or near saturation, and at least 
moderately steep slopes. Man's acti- 
vities may contribute to movement by 
changing the slope or other character- 
istics of the mantle and by influencing 
the distribution of water. Since a 
complex of factors interact in the pro- 
duction of mass 
often extremely difficult to pinpoint 
the specific cause of amass movement 
In a very real sense, 
differs in 
respect from any other event, and 


movements, it is 


event. every 


movement event some 
each represents a particular combina- 
tion of conditions which culminates in 


massive mantle failure. 


Perhaps one of the most im- 
portant problems facingus isto deter- 
mine the extent that man's activities 
contribute to the occurrence of mass 
soil movements. From our experience 
in the H. J. Andrews Experimental 
Forest, we are forced to conclude that 
man-caused disturbance has had an 
important influence in the occurrence 

Although 
apparently 


of mass soil movements. 
logging disturbance also 
increased movement frequency, this 
relationship is especially marked in 
the case of road construction. How- 
ever, it should be borne in mind that 
inanarea such as the Andrews Forest, 
where slopes are steep anda large 
portion is underlain by soft, deeply 
weathered pyroclastic rocks, the stage 
is set for extensive mass movements 
during high rainfall periods whether 
or not disturbanceis afactor. There- 
fore, it is perhaps often true that 
man's activities accelerate the occur- 
rence of mantle failure events in an 
rather than 


already unstable area, 


2 


contribute in any significant way to 
this basic instability. In other words, 
disturbance may cause some small 
and, by itself, insignificant change 
whichisnonetheless sufficient toupset 
the tenuous equilibrium and trigger 
mass soil movement. 


It is perhaps of some signifi- 
cance that the largest mass movement 
events encountered in this study were 
those which occurred in undisturbed 
areas. All involved extensive stream 
channel scouring, andthe source areas 
were oversteepened drainage heads. 
This general pattern is interpreted as 
the normal course of geologic erosion. 
On the other hand, man-caused move- 
ments are generally smaller, since 
the entire slope--from drainage head 
to main stream channel--is generally 
not involved. 
disturbed involve only 
rights-of-way, or perhaps onlya small 
portion of the slope below the road, 


Instead, many events in 


areas road 


Since roads are so oftenan im- 
portant factor in causing mass move- 
ments, the problem is) to ,determunie 
means of minimizing their effect. 
Perhaps the most obvious means is to 
reduce road mileage to an 


minimum. In 


absolute 
steep, mountainous 
terrain, this may be done by the use 
of skyline and, possibly, balloon log- 
ging methods. In many areas, it is 
possible that improvements in road 
location may appreciably reduce the 
frequency of mass soil movements. 
Unstable soils and landforms should 
be identified, and the route selected 
should avoid 


possible. 


these areas wherever 
In addition, improvements 
in road design and construction may 
also contribute substantially to in- 
creased mantle stability. Modification 
of waste handling to avoid sidecasting 
on steep slopes and provision for ade- 
quate road drainage are two of the 
more important means to minimize 
mass movement hazard, 


*eote [P02 9u3 
JO qusoted /¢ ATUo Adnooo YyOTYM YOoApseq eTd9e1q 10/pue 
Jjn} JO seeie UL pezANDDO sjUsAS 9YyQ FO QUdDAed HE AZAD 
*seole posZ80[T UL JUeDAed /{[ pue speor YIM UOTJIO.UUOD 
UL PeATAND.O sjZUSWSAOW SseuW 94 FO JUBdAed Z/ JANOWy 
‘uowWO0d SOW 3} FARM SJUBAD BUTANODS [osuUeYD pue 
MOTFUIASY *CO-FYO6T JO ASIUTM JY BUTINP swz0qS sATVAaS 
WOIF BUTIJTNSeAT sjzUeAD JUSWDAOW sseul /y SozATeUy 


*S01Q ‘puezT}10g SuOoT 
-P1S JUoWTisdxy o8uey yY WSeT0q Isamu AON 
OTFTIeqG *snt{Tt “dd ZT *7y-MNd “deg “sey 
"ATES 3Set0g *S*H *4SeAOG [Te UsWTIedxy 
smMelpuy “fF *H 9U} UT SjUSWOAOW [IOS sseW */O6T 
"L °9 Sssourhq 


"pore [e}0J 9u} 
jo queoted /¢ ATuo Adndd0 YyOTYM YOoLpeq eTI90e1q 10/pue 
Jjn] JO seerte UT pazINdd.O sqUuaAe 9Yy} JO JUad1ed HG A9ACO 
*seoie pesZ0T UT JUso1ed /]T pue speor YIM UOTID.UUOD 
UT PeTINDIO sjJUSsWeAOW sseW 9Yy FO JUsdA1ed Z/ ANnOoay 
*uoWWwOD 2SOW 294 919M SQUSAS BUTANODS ToeuUeYD pue 
MOTJFUIZEY °CQ-FOGT FO ASQVUIM 9Y BUTANP swW10}S 9AZAeS 
WOAF BUTI[NSeA sjUSAD JUSWBAOW sseW /y SazkTeUy 


°301Q9 S‘pue{,qaA0g SuO0TR 
-b1S$ JUoUTiedxy o8uey 9 JSeIOY JSamyuIAON 
oTFToeg “*snt{t ‘*dd ZT *77-MNd ‘deg ‘soy 
*AIOS ASeT0g *S*Q *3Se10qg [e.USWTISdxyY 
smeipuy “*f °H 84 UT SjUSUWBAOW [IOS sseW */96T 
"L °9 Sssourkq 


*eorte [e}02 934A 
jo qusoted ¢¢ ATuo Adndd90 yOTYM YyOoApsq et2001q 10/pue 
Jgnq JO seoie UT paetzAndd0 sqUaAd 9, FO JUsoAZ0d 4G I9AQ 
*seoie pes80, ut Jusdzed /,T pue speor YIM UOTJIeUUOD 
UT peTANDO sjUSWaAOW SSeW ay} JO JUadZed Z/ ANOWYy 
*uouMlOD SOW 94} 99M SJUZAD BUTANODS ToUUeYD pue 
MOTJUIAPY “CO-HOST FO A9RZUTIM JU BUTANP sw10}RS JAdAeS 
WOTF BSUTJ[NSel sqUuseAS JUSWseAOW sseu /y SazATeUYy 


*8aI1Q0 ‘pue,[}AOg ‘Su0T A 
-b1S JUsuTisdxg o8uey Y JSeTO0q JsomyION 
oTFToeq “sntT{t *:dd ZT *7y-MNd “deg “sey 
"ALIS 3SeA0qG *S°NQ *°3SeT0q TeIUSWTIASedxXY 
sMeipuy ‘ff °*H 9U UT SJUSWSAOUW TIOS sseW “*/96T 
"LL °9 Sssaurkq 


"pore Te}07 94] 
Jo qusoied se ATuo Adndd0 YOTYM YOoAped eToI9e1q 10/pue 
Jjn} JO seoie UT petANdIO sjUaAe 9Yy. JO JUedTed 46 129AQ 
“spore pe830,T UT queoied /[ pue speod YITM UOT ID9UUOD 
UT PpetANI.O sqUeWeAOW sseW 9Yy} FO JUadZed Z/ Jnoqy 
*uoWmo0D JSOW 39Yy} 9AM SJUDAD BUTANODS ToeuueYD pue 
MOTFYIASY “GO-VOGT JO A9QVUTM 9YI BUTANP suz0IS sAdAeS 
wOoIjy BSUTI[NSeA s}USAS JUSWeAOW sseW /} sazATeUYy 


°80109 S‘pue,Tqao0g ‘u0T] 
-P1S$ JUeWTIedxy osuey YR JSeTOY JSemMYyIAON 
OTFToeG “sn{Tt ‘dd ZT ‘Zy-MNd “dea “sey 
*ATeg 4ysetOg *S*Q *4SeTO_ [Te UeUTIedxy| 
smeipuy °“f *H 94} UT SqUsWaAOW [TOS sseW “*/96T 
"L °9D Sssourkg 


The FOREST SERVICE of the 

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 
is dedicated to the principle of mul- 
tiple use management of the Nation’s 
forest resources for sustained yields 
of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and 
recreation, Through forestry research, 
cooperation with the States and private 
forest owners, and management of 
the National Forests and National 
Grasslands, it strives — as directed 
by Congress — to provide increasingly 
greater service to a growing Nation. 


H.J. ANDREWS , | 
EXPERIMENTAL FOREST ) 
mi ROADS === | 


CLEARCUT UNIT BOUNDARIES \--~~- J 
§00-FOOT CONTOUR LINES ---0~— a Me 


BOUNDARIES OF SIX ve : ; 
SMALL WATERSHEDS =" s os 


TRAILS =r . 


DRAINAGE SYSTEMS sone een Va 
TASS | yo : 
euniecesemeesctoenanionreaniaey ena ora CRNA TE IEMNIESSOD — BRACE OREM NENS SENATE 


SCALE 47='1 MILE 
REVISED MAY 3967 BY BKS ( 


T.1A6S 


MASS SOIL MO 
a 


Re 


D Slang 


SS 


ZX Tare 
sae ENO Slay 


aoe x 
a ENE we SE 
arte ie 


a OS 
Soe PERSO 
pote 

~ an 

ay ¥ 
LN het 

Leet 
Aviad 


St 


oe 
cones! “s 
eee ee 
Lasher 
Syd gates 
anion, 


eee 23 

‘ Seg es Wet Seton 
eS Eee 

tee SE 


pn ee Ee 
er ae 


ee a en pease teed nee : 


ae eo ae pene pa 
ra tn gonna