Skip to main content

Full text of "Final environmental impact statement : Moyer Salt timber sale"

See other formats


Historic,  Archive  Document 

Do  not  assume  content  reflects  current 
scientific  knowledge,  policies,  or  practices. 


Final  Environmental 
Impact  Statement 

Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale 


United  States 
Department  of 
Agricuiture 

Forest 

Service 

Salmon 

National 

Forest 


Cobalt 

Ranger 

District 


United  States 
Department  of 
Agriculture 


I t 1 J 


National  Agricultural  Library 


ERRATA  SHEET 


July,  27,  1993 

Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 

PLEASE  NOTE:  After  the  Final  EIS  was  printed,  we  found  the  following  corrections. 

The  chapter  headings  at  the  top  of  the  pages  for  Chapters  I,  III  and  Appendix  E say  “Draft  EIS.*  These  should 
all  read  “Final  EIS.“ 

The  legend  for  the  map  on  page  111-23  should  have  Area  2 filled  in  with  blue  ink. 

The  mailing  list  for  the  Final  EIS  had  some  additions  and  corrections  between  printing  and  mailing  (Page  VI-5). 


FINAL 

ENVIRONMENTAL  IMPACT  STATEMENT 


Summary 

Moyer  Sa8t  Timber  Sale 

Cobalt  Ranger  District 
Salmon  National  Forest 

Lemhi  County,  Idaho 
1993 

Lead  Agency:  USDA  Forest  Service 

Responsible  Official:  John  Burns 

Forest  Supervisor 
Salmon  National  Forest 
P.O.  Box  729 
Salmon,  Idaho  83467 
(208)  756-2215 

For  Further  Information,  Contact:  Lynn  M.  Bennett 

Environmental  Coordinator 
Salmon  National  Forest 
(208)  756-2215,  ext.  132 

Russell  Bjorklund 
Timber  Management  Assistant 
Cobalt  District,  SNF 
(208)  756-2240 


Abstract:  This  Final  Environmental  Impact  Statement  documents  the  analysis  of  the  effects  of  the  proposed  timber  harvesting  and  related 
road  construction  in  the  1 5,360  acre  Moyer  Salt  Analysis  Area.  The  proposed  actions  are  designed  to  help  achieve  the  silvicultural  goals 
and  objectives  of  the  1988  Salmon  National  Forest  Land  and  Resource  Management  Plan  (Forest  Plan). 

Seven  alternatives,  including  a "no  action"  alternative  were  developed  to  respond  to  issues  associated  with  the  proposed  action  that  were 
identified  during  the  scoping  process. 

The  action  alternatives  include,  Alternative  2,  as  published  in  the  Notice  of  Intent  on  October  1,  1990.  This  alternative  would  harvest  568 
acres  and  4.9  million  board  feet  (MMBF)  of  mixed  conifer  and  Douglas-fir  stands  with  16.8  miles  of  new  roads.  Alternative  3 was 
developed  to  address  concerns  on  wildlife,  particularly  the  key  elk  summer  range.  Alternative  4 emphasizes  timber  production  and  has 
the  maximum  amount  of  acreage  proposed  for  harvest  and  the  greatest  number  of  roads.  The  next  three  alternatives  (5,  6,  and  2A)  were 
developed  between  the  Draft  and  Final  EIS  and  respond  to  suggestions  from  the  public  during  the  45  day  comment  period  following  the 
release  of  the  Draft.  Alternative  5 responds  to  a request  for  no  road  access  for  timber  harvest.  It  has  the  least  acreage  proposed  for  harvest 
and  the  least  amount  of  new  road  construction.  Alternative  6,  the  preferred  alternative,  was  developed  to  provide  a balance  between 
visual  quality  concerns  and  insect  and  disease  conditions.  It  has  the  second  highest  amount  of  acres  affected  and  the  same  number  of 
new  road  construction  as  Alternative  2.  Alternative  2A,  is  similar  to  Alternative  2,  the  original  proposed  alternative,  but  places  special 
emphasis  on  visual  quality. 


Table  of  Contents 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  ESS 


Table  ©f  Contents 


TABLE  OF  CONTENTS 

TITLE  PAGE 

Table  of  Contents  Table  of 

Contents  - 1 

Summary-  Summary -1 

Chapter  I - Purpose  of  and  Need  for  Action 

Changes  Between  the  Draft  and  Final  1-1 

Proposed  Action  1-1 

Purpose  of  and  Need  for  Action  1-1 

Location  and  Access  1-4 

The  Forest  Plan  1-4 

Management  Area  Goals  1-6 

Scope  or  the  Proposed  Action  1-8 

Decisions  to  be  Made  Based  on  this  Analysis  1-8 

The  NEPA  Process  1-8 

Appeal  Process  1-9 

Final  EIS  Document  Organization  1-9 

Scoping  and  the  Identification  of  Issues  1-9 

Internal  Scoping  and  the  Public 

Involvement  Process  1-9 

Environmental  Issues  and  Concerns  1-10 

Vegetation  1-1 0 

Wildlife  1-1 1 

Roadless  Character  1-1 2 

Economics  1-12 

Soils  1-13 

Hydrology  1-13 

Wetlands  1-13 

Fisheries  1-14 

Biological  Diversity  1-14 

Threatened,  Endangered  and  Sensitive  Species  1-14 

Visual  Resources  1-15 

Recreation  1-1 5 

Air  Quality  1-15 

Transportation  and  Access  1-15 

Minerals  1-16 

Cultural  Resources  1-16 

Range  Resources  1-16 

Chapter  II  - Alternatives,  Including  the  Proposed  Action 

Changes  Between  the  Draft  and  Final  11-1 

Chapter  Review  11-1 

Alternative  Development  Process  11-1 

Alternatives  Considered  But  Not 

Given  Detailed  Study  11-1 

Alternatives  Considered  in  Detail  11-3 


Table  of  Contents  - 1 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Table  of  Contents 


Clearcut  Harvest  11-3 

Shelterwood  Harvest  11-4 

Road  Construction  and  Reconstruction 

Standards  and  Guidelines  11-5 

Alternative  Descriptions 

Alternative  1 - No  Action  SI-7 

Alternative  2 11-9 

Alternatives  11-13 

Alternative  4 11-17 

Alternative  5 11-21 

Alternative  6 (PREFERRED)  11-25 

Alternative  2A  11-29 

Management  and  Mitigation  11-31 

Management  and  Mitigation  Measures  Specific 
To  All  Action  Alternatives  11-31 

Soils  il-32 

Hydrology  11-32 

Wetlands  11-33 

Fisheries  11-33 

Vegetation  11-34 

Wildlife  H-34 

Threatened,  Endangered,  and 

Sensitive  Species  11-36 

Visual  Resource  11-36 

Air  Quality  11-36 

Range  Management  11-37 

Cultural  Resources  11-37 

Monitoring  11-38 

Forest  Plan  Monitoring  11-38 

Soils  11-38 

Water  and  Water  Quality  11-38 

Fisheries  11-39 

Timber  11-39 

Wildlife  11-39 

Threatened  and  Endangered  Species  11-39 

Cultural  Resources  11-39 

Economics  11-39 

Project  Monitoring  H-39 

Soils  H-40 

Water  Quality  and  Fisheries  11-40 

Vegetation  (Timber)  11-40 

Air  Quality/Fisheries  H-41 

Wildlife  H-41 

Transportation  H-41 

Cultural  Resources  H-41 

Comparison  of  Alternatives  11-41 

Chapter  SSI  - Affected  Environment 

Changes  Between  the  Draft  and  Final  HI-1 

Chapter  Review  HI-1 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives  HI-1 


Table  of  Contents  - 2 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Table  of  Contents 


Soils  111-1 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives  111-1 

Affected  Area  111-1 

Existing  Condition  HI-2 

Hydrology  111-5 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives  111-5 

Affected  Area  1 11-5 

Existing  Condition  HI-5 

Wetlands  111-6 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives  HI-6 

Affected  Area  111-6 

Existing  Condition  111-6 

Fisheries  HI-7 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives  111-7 

Affected  Streams  111-7 

Resident  Fisheries  111-8 

Anadromous  Fisheries  ill-8 

Fish  Habitat  111-8 

Woodtick  Creek  Drainage  111-8 

Moyer  Creek  Drainage  111-9 

Biological  Diversity  111-10 

Existing  Environment  IIS-10 

Regional  Perspective  111-1 1 

Forest  Perspective  111-1 1 

Landscape  Perspective  111-13 

Community  diversity  111-13 

Unique  Habitats  111-15 

Wildlife  111-15 

Timber  Resources  111-16 

Past  Actions  That  Affect  the 

Present  Condition  111-16 

Historic  Fire  Patterns  111-16 

Drought  111-16 

Past  Timber  Harvest  Activity  111-16 

Insects  and  Disease  111-17 

Suitable  Timberland  111-18 

Site  Potential  111-20 

Vegetative  Age/Condition 

Distribution  IIS-20 

Noxious  Weeds  111-21 

Wildlife  Resource  111-21 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives  111-21 

Affected  Area  111-21 

Wildlife  Species  Considered  111-21 

Big  Game  (Ungulates)  111-21 

Other  Wildlife  Species  111-24 

Threatened,  Endangered  and  Sensitive  Species  111-24 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives  111-24 

Threatened  and  Endangered  Plants 

and  Terrestrial  Vertebrates  111-25 

Threatened  and  Endangered  Aquatic  Vertebrates  111-25 


Table  of  Contents  - 3 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  ESS 


Tabie  of  Contents 


Sensitive  Plants 

111-25 

Sensitive  Terrestrial  Vertebrate  Species 

111-25 

Sensitive  Aquatic  Vertebrate  Species 

111-26 

Roadless  Area  Resource 

111-26 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives 

111-26 

Affected  Area 

111-26 

Existing  Condition 

111-26 

Visual  Resources 

111-30 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives 

111-30 

Affected  Area 

111-30 

Existing  Condition 

111-30 

Recreation  Resources 

111-30 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives 

111-30 

Affected  Area 

111-30 

Existing  Condition 

111-30 

Air  Quality 

111-31 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives 

111-31 

Affected  Area 

111-31 

Existing  Condition 

111-31 

Range  Resources 

111-32 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives 

111-32 

Affected  Area 

111-32 

Existing  Condition 

111-32 

Transportation  and  Access 

111-32 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives 

111-32 

Affected  Area 

111-32 

Existing  Condition 

111-33 

Mineral  Resources 

111-33 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives 

111-33 

Affected  Environment 

111-33 

Existing  Condition 

111-33 

Cultural  Resources 

111-33 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives 

111-33 

Affected  Area 

111-33 

Existing  Condition 

111-33 

Economic  Efficiency 

111-34 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives 

111-34 

Affected  Area 

111-34 

Existing  Condition 

111-34 

Chapter  8V  - Environmental  Consequences 

Changes  Between  the  Draft  and  Final 

IV-1 

Chapter  Review 

IV-1 

Soils  Effects 

IV-1 

Effects  Common  to  all  Action  Alternatives 

IV-2 

Effects  by  Alternative 

IV-3 

Alternative  1 - No  Action 

IV-3 

Alternative  2 

IV-3 

Alternative  3 

IV-3 

Alternative  4 

IV-4 

Alternative  5 

IV-4 

Table  of  Contents  - 4 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Table  of  Contents 


Alternative  6 IV-4 

Alternative  2A  IV-4 

Cumulative  Effects  IV-4 

Consistency  with  Forest  Plan  Standards 

and  Guidelines  IV-4 

Hydrology  Effects  IV-4 

Water  Quality  and  Stream  Sedimentation  IV-4 

Water  Yield  and  Peak  Flows  IV-4 

Effects  Common  to  all  Action  Alternatives  IV-5 

Effects  Due  to  Timber  Harvesting  IV-5 

Effects  Due  to  Road  Construction 

and  Reconstruction  IV-5 

Effects  by  Alternative  IV-8 

Alternative  1 - No  Action  IV-8 

Alternative  2 IV-8 

Alternative  3 IV-9 

Alternative  4 IV-1 0 

Alternative  5 IV-1 1 

Alternative  6 IV- 1 1 

Alternative  2A  IV-1 2 

Cumulative  Effects  IV-1 2 

Consistency  with  Forest  Plan 

Standards  and  Guidelines  IV-1 2 

Wetlands  Effects  IV-1 2 

Direct  and  Indirect  Effects 

from  Timber  Harvest  IV-1 2 

Direct  and  Indirect  Effects 

from  Road  Construction  IV-1 2 

Cumulative  Effects  IV-1 3 

Consistency  with  Forest  Plan 

Standards  and  Guidelines  IV-1 3 

Fisheries  Effects  IV-1 4 

Effects  Common  to  All  Action  Alternatives  IV-1 4 

Effects  by  Alternative  IV-1 5 

Alternative  1 - No  Action  IV-1 5 

Alternative  2 IV-1 6 

Alternatives  1V-16 

Alternative  4 IV-1 7 

Alternative  5 IV-1 7 

Alternative  6 IV-1 8 

Alternative  2A  IV-1 8 

Cumulative  Effects  IV-1 9 

Consistency  with  Forest  Plan 

Standards  and  Guidelines  IV-1 9 

Effects  to  Biological  Diversity  IV-1 9 

Effects  of  the  Proposal  IV-1 9 

Changes  in  diversity  due  to  changes  in 

plant  communities  IV-1 9 

Effects  on  travel  corridors  IV-20 

Unique  habitats  IV-20 

Effects  on  rare  species  IV-21 


Table  of  Contents  - 5 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sal©  Final  ESS 


Table  of  Contents 


Vegetation  Effects  IV-21 

Effects  to  Vegetative  Diversity  IV-21 

Habitat  Types  IV-22 

Forest  Succession  IV-22 

Condition  Class  IV-22 

Effects  to  Species  and  Structure 
Species  Diversity  IV-23 

Structural  Diversity  IV-23 

Shelterwood  Harvest  IV-24 

Effects  to  the  Timber  Resource  IV-24 

Age  Diversity  IV-26 

Insects  and  Disease  IV-27 

Fire  Management  Considerations  IV-28 

Noxious  Weeds  and  Exotic  Plants  IV-28 

Effects  by  Alternative  IV-28 

Alternative  1 - No  Action  IV-28 

Alternative  2 IV-29 

Alternative  3 IV-29 

Alternative  4 IV-30 

Alternative  5 IV-30 

Alternative  6 IV-31 

Alternative  2A  IV-32 

Cumulative  Effects  IV-33 

Consistency  with  Forest  Plan 

Standards  and  Guidelines  IV-34 

Effects  to  Wildlife  Resources  IV-34 

Effects  Common  to  all  Action  Alternatives  IV-35 

Effects  by  Alternative  IV-35 

Alternative  1 - No  Action  IV-36 

Alternative  2 IV-36 

Alternative  3 SV-38 

Alternative  4 IV-38 

Alternative  5 IV-39 

Alternative  6 IV-39 

Alternative  2A  IV-39 

Cumulative  Effects  IV-4Q 

Consistency  with  Forest  Plan 

Standards  and  Guidelines  IV-40 

Effects  to  Threatened,  Endangered, 

and  Sensitive  Species  IV-40 

Effects  to  Threatened  and  Endangered  Aquatic 
Species  IV-40 

Effects  to  Threatened  and  Endangered  Terres- 
trial Species  IV-40 

Effects  to  Endangered  Fish  Species  Common 
To  All  Alternatives  IV-41 

Effects  to  Threatened  Fish  Species  IV-41 

Alternative  1 - No  Action  IV-41 

Alternatives  2,  3,  4,  5,  6 and  2A  SV-42 

Alternative  3 IV-42 

Effects  to  Sensitive  Species  IV-42 


Table  of  Contents  - 6 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Table  of  Contents 


Effects  to  Sensitive  Aquatic  Vertebrates  IV-42 

Effects  to  Sensitive  Terrestrial 
Vertebrate  Species  IV-44 

Effects  to  Sensitive  Plant  Species  IV-45 

Effects  to  Roadless  Resources  IV-46 

Effects  Common  to  all  Action  Alternatives  IV-46 

Alternative  1 - No  Action  IV-47 

Cumulative  Effects  IV-47 

Consistency  with  Forest  Plan 

Standards  and  Guidelines  1V-48 

Visual  Effects  IV-48 

Effects  Common  to  all  Action  Alternatives  IV-48 

Effects  by  Alternative  IV-49 

Alternative  1 - No  Action  IV-49 

Alternative  2 IV-49 

Alternative  3 IV-49 

Alternative  4 IV-49 

Alternative  5 IV-49 

Alternative  6 IV-49 

Alternative  2A  IV-49 

Cumulative  Effects  IV-49 

Consistency  with  Forest  Plan 

Standards  and  Guidelines  IV-50 

Recreation  Effects  IV-50 

Effects  Common  to  all  Action  Alternatives  IV-50 

Effects  by  Alternative  IV-51 

Alternative  1 - No  Action  IV-51 

Alternative  2 IV-51 

Alternative  3 IV-51 

Alternative  4 IV-51 

Alternative  5 IV-51 

Alternative  6 IV-51 

Alternative  2A  IV-51 

Consistency  with  Forest  Plan 

Standards  and  Guidelines  IV-51 

Effects  to  Air  Quality  IV-51 

Prescribed  Burning  IV-52 

Dust  and  Vehicle  Emissions  IV-52 

Effects  by  Alternative 

Alternative  1 - No  Action  IV-52 

Effects  Common  to  all  Action  Alternatives  IV-52 

Cumulative  Effects  IV-53 

Consistency  with  Forest  Plan 

Standards  and  Guidelines  IV-53 

Effects  to  Range  Resources  IV-53 

Effects  Common  to  all  Action  Alternatives  1V-54 

Alternative  1 - No  Action  IV-54 

Cumulative  Effects  IV-54 

Consistency  with  Forest  Plan 

Standards  and  Guidelines  IV-54 

Effects  to  Transportation  and  Access  IV-54 


Table  of  Contents  - 7 


Moyer  Saif  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Table  of  Contents 


Effects  Common  to  all  Action  Alternatives  IV-54 

Alternative  1 - No  Action  IV-55 

Consistency  with  Forest  Plan 

Standards  and  Guidelines  IV-55 

Effects  to  Minerals  IV-56 

Effects  Common  to  all  Action  Alternatives  IV-56 

Cumulative  Effects  IV-56 

Consistency  with  Forest  Plan 

Standards  and  Guidelines  IV-56 

Effects  to  Cultural  Resources  IV-56 

Effects  Common  to  all  Action  Alternatives  IV-56 

Consistency  with  Forest  Plan 

Standards  and  Guidelines  IV-56 

Economic  Efficiency  IV-56 

Effects  Common  to  all  Action  Alternatives  IV-57 

Effects  by  Alternative  IV-58 

Alternative  2 IV-58 

Alternative  3 IV-58 

Alternative  4 IV-58 

Alternative  5 IV-58 

Alternative  6 IV-59 

Alternative  2A  IV-59 

Potential  Conflicts  with  Plans  and  Policies 

of  Other  Jurisdictions  IV-59 

Cultural  Resources  IV-59 

Probable  Environmental  Effects 

that  Cannot  be  Avoided  IV-59 

Visual  Quality  IV-59 

Air  Quality  IV-59 

Roadless  Resource  IV-59 

Recreation  IV-60 

Irreversible  and  Irretrievable 

Commitments  of  Resources  IV-60 

Irreversible  and  Irretrievable  IV-60 

Irretrievable  IV-60 

Other  Required  Disclosures  IV-60 

Relationship  between  Short-term  Uses  of  Man’s 
Environment  and  the  Maintenance  and 
Enhancement  of  Long-term  Productivity  IV-60 

Energy  Requirements  and  Conservation 
Potential  of  Various  Alternatives 

and  Mitigation  Measures  IV-61 

American  Indian  Treaty  Rights  IV-61 

Threatened  and  Endangered  Species  IV-61 

Minerals  IV-61 

Water  Quality  IV-61 

Effects  on  Prime  Farmland,  Rangeland, 

and  Forestland  IV-61 

Effects  on  Minorities  and  Women  IV-61 

Effects  on  Wetlands  and  Floodplains  IV-61 


Table  of  Contents  - 8 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  E1S 


Table  of  Contents 


Chapter  V - List  of  Preparers 

Core  Interdisciplinary  Team  Members  V-1 

Consultation  and  Review  V-3 

Approval  V-3 

Chapter  VI  - Scoping  and  Public  involvement  VI-1 

Scoping  and  Public  and  Interagency 

Participation  Opportunities  VI-1 

Consultation  with  Other  Agencies  and 

Organizations  VI-2 

Consultation  Between  the  Draft  and  Final  EIS  VI-2 

List  of  Agencies,  Organizations  and  Individuals 

that  responded  to  the  Draft  EIS  VI-2 

The  Major  Geographical  Sources  of  Comment 

Letter  on  the  Draft  EIS  VI-4 

The  Major  Issues  Raised  in  the  Comment 

Letters  on  the  Draft  EIS  VI-4 

List  of  Agencies,  Organizations  and  Individuals 

to  Whom  Copies  of  the  the  Final  EIS  were  Sent  VI-4 

Chapter  VS  - Supplement  (Bound  Separately) 

Public  Comment  Letters  and  Forest  Service 

Respom®-  Vi- 
es Supplement 

Chapter  VIS  ■ Literature  Cited  VII-1 

Glossary  Glossary-1 

Index  Index-1 

Appendices 

A - National  Marine  Fisheries  Service,  Species  A-1 

List  Concurrence  Letter 

B1  - Best  Management  Practices  for  Soil  and  Water  B-1 

B2  - Federal  Consistency  Checklist  3-2 

C - Evaluation  of  Wildlife  Mitigation  Measure  C-1 

D - Wildlife  Species  List  D-1 

E - Vegetation  Species  List  E-1 

FI  - Biological  Assessment  For  Federally  Listed 

Plant  and  Terrestrial  Vertebrate  Species  F-1 

F2  - Biological  Assessment  For  Federally  Listed 

Fish  F-2 

G1  - Biological  Evaluation  For  Sensitive  Species 

Plants  and  Terrestrial  Vertebrates  G-1 

G2  - Biological  Evaluation  For  Sensitive 

Fish  Species  G-2 

H - Landscape  Ecology/Biological  Diversity  Outline  H-1 

Biological  Diversity  H-1 


Table  of  Contents  - 9 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Table  of  Contents 


LIST  OF  TABLES 


Table  11-1:  Management  and  Mitigation  Measures 
Specific  to  all  Action  Alternatives 

11-31 

Table  11-2:  Comparison  of  Effects  of  the 
Alternatives  by  Resource 

11-42 

Table  111-1:  Landtypes  in  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber 
Sale  Analysis  Area 

111-2 

Table  111-2:  Soil  Erosion  and  Mass  Stability 

Characteristics  in  the  Moyer  Salt 
Timber  Sale  Analysis  Area 

111-4 

Table  111-3:  Conifer  Vegetation  Types 

111-13 

Table  ISI-4:  Forested  Ecosystems  for  the 
Landscape  Level 

111-14 

Table  111-5:  Timber  Classifications  of  the  Moyer 
Salt  Timber  Sale  Analysis  Area 

111-18 

Table  111-6:  Site  Potentials  for  the  Habitat  Types 
of  the  Moyer  Salt  Analysis  Area 

111-20 

Table  111-7:  Estimated  Age  Distribution  for 

the  Douglas-fir  and  Lodgepole  Pine  Forest 
Communities 

111-20 

Table  IV-1:  Impacts  to  Soils  by  Alternative 

IV-2 

Table  IV-2:  Percent  of  Drainages  Harvested  in  the 
Moyer  Salt  Analysis  Area 

IV-5 

Table  IV-3:  Road  Density 

IV-7 

Table  IV-4.  Sediment  Yield  Modeling  Results 

IV-7 

Table  IV-5.  Acres  Harvested,  Estimated  Timber  Harvest 
and  Harvest  Method  by  Alternative 

IV-25 

Table  IV-6:  Desired  Distribution  of  Age  Classes 
in  Year  2030 

IV-26 

Table  IV-7:  Age  Distribution  Following 
Timber  Harvest 

IV-27 

Table  of  Contents  - 10 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  ESS 


Table  of  Contents 


Table  IV-8:  Effects  to  Wildlife  Habitat  in  the 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Analysis  Area 
by  Alternative 

IV-37 

Table  IV-9:  Effects  on  the  Roadless  Resource 
by  Alternative 

IV-47 

Table  IV-10:  Acres  of  Slash  Burned  and  Estimated 
Total  Particulates  Emitted  (tons)  by 
Alternative 

IV-53 

Table  IV-11:  Acres  of  Commercial  Timberland 

Available  for  Harvest  by  Existing  and 
Proposed  Road  Systems,  by  Alternative 

IV-55 

Table  IV-12:  Economic  Efficiency  by  Alternative 

IV-58 

Table  VI-1:  Individuals  Who  Attended  the  Public 

Meeting  for  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale 

VI-1 

Table  VI-2:  Agencies  and  Organizations  Who 

Commented  on  the  Notice  Of  Intent 

VI-2 

Table  VI-3:  List  of  Agencies,  Organizations,  and 

Individuals  to  Whom  Copies  of  the  Draft 
EIS  were  sent 

VI-2 

Table  H-1:  Forest  Class  Totals  for  the  Moyer  Salt 
EIS  Analysis  Area 

Appendix 

H-10 

Table  H-2:  Forest  Class  Category  Descriptions 

Appendix 
H-1 1 

Table  H-3:  TEPS  Select/Avoidance  Communities 

Appendix 
H-1 7 

Table  H-4:  Boundary  Crossing  Frequency 

Appendix 

H-21 

Table  H-5:  Acres  Cut  in  Each  Timber  Class  by 
Alternative 

Appendix 

H-27 

Table  H-6:  Percentage  Total  Proposed  Harvest  in  Each 
Timber  Class  by  Alternative 

Appendix 

H-28 

Table  H-7:  Acres  in  Each  Harvest  Method  by 
Alternative 

Appendix 

H-29 

Table  of  Contents  - 11 


Moyer  Sa!t  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Table  of  Contents 


Table  H-8:  Forest  Class  Size  Averages  (acres): 
- Existing  and  Proposed 


Table  H-9:  Acre  Harvest  from  Each  Forest  Type 


Table  H-10:  Miles  of  Road  Constructed  or 
Reconstructed  by  Alternative 


Table  H-11:  Porosity  As  Measured  by  Patch  Numbers 


Table  H-12:  Boundary  Crossing  Frequency  by 
Alternative 


Appendix 

H-29 

Appendix 

H-31 


Appendix 

H-36 

Appendix 

H-37 


Appendix 

H-39 


LIST  OF  FIGURES 


Figure 

1-1 : Vicinity  Map 

1-3 

Figure 

1-2:  Location  Map 

1-5 

Figure 

1-3:  Management  Areas 

1-7 

Figure 

11-1 : Alternative  1 - No  Action 

11-6 

Figure 

11-2:  Alternative  2 

11-8 

Figure 

11-3:  Alternative  3 

11-12 

Figure 

11-4:  Alternative  4 

11-16 

Figure 

11-5:  Alternative  5 

11-20 

Figure 

11-5:  Alternative  6 

11-24 

Figure 

11-7:  Alternative  2A 

11-28 

Figure 

111-1 : landtype  Map 

111-3 

Figure 

111-2:  Landscape  Boundary  Map 

111-12 

Figure 

111-3:  Old  Growth  Retention  Areas 

111-19 

Table  of  Contents  - 12 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Figure  111-4:  Wildlife  Habitat  and  Key  Elk 
Summer  Range 

Figure  111-5:  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area 


Table  of  Contents 


111-23 

111-29 


Table  of  Contents  - 13 


Summary 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Summary 


SUMMARY 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 
FINAL  ENVIRONMENTAL  IMPACT  STATEMENT 

Salmon  National  Forest,  Cobalt  Ranger  District 
Lemhi  County,  Idaho 
June,  1993 


This  Final  Environmental  Impact  Statement  (EIS)  describes  the  direct,  indirect  and  cumulative  environmental 
effects  of  a proposal  by  the  Forest  Service  to  harvest  timber  and  construct  and  reconstruct  roads  in  the  Moyer 
Salt  analysis  area. 

This  summary  describes  the  purpose  of  the  proposal,  the  identified  issues,  the  alternatives  developed  in 
response  to  those  issues,  the  monitoring  and  mitigation  measures  developed  for  the  project,  the  affected 
environment  in  the  analysis  area,  and  briefly  describes  and  compares  the  effects  of  the  alternatives  on  the 
existing  environment  of  the  analysis  area. 

Copies  of  the  Final  EIS  are  available  from  the  Salmon  National  Forest  Supervisors  Office  and  the  Cobalt 
Ranger  District  of  the  Salmon  National  Forest,  Highway  93  South,  Salmon,  ID  83467.  The  Moyer  Salt  Timber 
Sale  project  files  are  available  for  viewing  at  the  Salmon  National  Forest  Supervisors  Office  in  Salmon,  Idaho. 
Copies  of  the  Final  EIS  will  also  be  available  in  the  public  libraries  in  Salmon,  Idaho;  Challis,  Idaho;  and  Darby, 
Montana.  Copies  will  also  be  available  for  review  at  each  of  the  Salmon  National  Forest  Ranger  District  offices: 
at  the  Salmon  District  Office  in  Salmon;  at  the  Cobalt  Ranger  District  Summer  Office  in  Cobalt,  Idaho;  at  the 
North  Fork  Ranger  District  in  North  Fork,  Idaho;  and  at  the  Leadore  Ranger  District  in  Leadore,  Idaho. 


THE  PROPOSED  ACTION 

The  Forest  Service  proposes  to  harvest  timber  in  portions  of  the  Moyer  Creek,  Salt  Creek,  Woodtick  Creek, 
Goodluck  Creek,  and  Pete’s  Gulch  drainages  in  the  Cobalt  Ranger  District  of  the  Salmon  National  Forest.  Six 
action  alternatives  for  harvesting  timber  and  a "No  Action"  alternative  were  developed  and  their  effects 
analyzed  in  the  environmental  analysis.  These  alternatives  represent  a reasonable  range  of  alternatives  for 
implementing  the  proposed  action,  and  were  developed  to  respond  to  issues  identified  by  the  Forest  Service 
and  the  public  during  the  scoping  process. 

The  timber  harvesting  and  road  construction  activities  that  would  take  place  under  an  action  alternative  would 
harvest  as  much  as  847  acres  on  the  Cobalt  Ranger  District  of  the  Salmon  National  Forest,  in  a maximum 
of  32  units  and  construct  a maximum  of  17.8  miles  of  road.  Trees  harvested  from  these  units  would  yield  as 
much  as  6.9  million  board  feet  (mmbf)  of  timber. 

The  National  Environmental  Policy  Act  (NEPA)  process  was  initiated  for  this  project  with  the  description  of 
the  Forest  Service’s  proposed  action  in  the  Notice  of  Intent  (NOI)  published  in  the  Federal  Register  on  July 
6, 1 990.  The  timber  harvest  activities  described  in  the  NOI  for  the  proposed  action  alternative  (Alternative  2) 
included  the  harvesting  of  4.9  million  board  feet  (MMBF)  from  568  acres  using  both  clearcutting  and 


Summary  - 1 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Summary 


shelterwood  harvesting  techniques  and  involved  building  16.8  miles  of  new  road  and  the  reconstruction  of 
less  than  one  mile  of  existing  road. 


PREFERRED  ALTERNATIVE 

The  Forest  Service  has  identified  Alternative  6 as  the  preferred  alternative  for  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale. 
Alternative  6 proposes  to  harvest  6.1  million  board  feet  of  timber  on  747  acres  and  construct  a maximum  of 
17.8  miles  of  road.  There  will  be  30  harvest  units  in  this  alternative. 


PURPOSE  OF  AND  NEED  FOR  ACTION 

The  Final  EIS  was  written  in  compliance  with  the  National  Environmental  Policy  Act  (NEPA)  and  was  prepared 
to  disclose  the  effects  of  the  proposed  timber  harvesting. 

The  proposed  action  alternatives  were  designed  to  implement  the  silvicultural  objectives  and  goals  of  the 
1988  Salmon  National  Forest  Land  and  Resource  Management  Plan  (Forest  Plan).  The  purpose  of  the 
proposed  timber  harvest  and  road  construction  is  to  meet  the  following  needs: 

The  proposed  action  alternatives  were  designed  to  help  provide  a continuous  flow  of  raw  materials  to 
dependent  manufacturing  communities  and  thereby  provide  community  stability.  It  is  also  designed 
to  enable  the  public  to  gather  firewood.  The  proposed  action  is  consistent  with  maintaining  the 
customs  and  cultures  of  these  communities. 

The  proposed  action  alternatives  were  designed  to  improve  the  growth  and  vigor  of  the  Forest  through 
silvicultural  treatments  that  would  produce  a more  vigorous  distribution  of  size  and  age  classes  of 
timber  stands  as  well  as  increase  the  vegetative  diversity  of  the  Forest. 

The  proposed  action  alternatives  were  designed  to  improve  the  health  of  the  Forest  by  applying 
coordinated  Forest  insect  and  disease  management  strategies  and  techniques  that  would  reduce 
damage  and  loss  due  to  insects  and  diseases. 

Long-term  management  direction  for  the  Forest  was  established  in  the  1 988  Salmon  National  Forest  Land 
and  Resource  Management  Plan  (Forest  Plan),  approved  in  January,  1988.  Among  other  things,  the  Forest 
Plan  established  the  Desired  Future  Condition  (DFC)  of  the  Forest  for  all  resources  and  uses  of  the  Forest; 
Forest  Plan  multiple  use  goals  and  objectives,  and  management  standards  and  guidelines  to  achieve  them; 
monitoring  and  evaluation  requirements  to  determine  whether  the  goals  and  objectives  are  being  met  and 
standards  and  guidelines  of  the  Forest  Plan  are  being  used;  Management  Areas,  or  sub-units  of  the  Forest 
with  similar  management  goals  and  a common  management  prescription;  lands  suited  for  timber  manage- 
ment and  the  maximum  amount  of  timber  that  may  be  sold  from  those  lands.  The  proposed  activities  are 
designed  to  implement  the  Forest  Plan. 

SCOPE  OF  THE  PROPOSED  ACTION 

The  Moyer  Salt  and  Salt  Creek  Timber  Sale  areas  were  determined  to  be  suitable  for  timber  harvesting  and 
were  delineated  as  timber  sale  areas  in  the  1 988  Forest  Plan.  Site-specific  timber  harvesting  and  associated 
road  construction  can  occur  in  this  area  only  if  the  Salmon  National  Forest  Supervisor  makes  a decision, 
based  on  the  analysis  documented  in  this  EIS,  to  allow  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  area  to  be  entered  for 
timber  harvest.  He  will  also  decide  how  much  timber  would  be  harvested,  what  methods  would  be  used,  and 
what  managements  requirements,  mitigation  measures  and  monitoring  activities  would  be  required.  The 


Summary  - 2 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Summary 


scope  of  the  proposed  action  is  therefore  limited  to  the  specific  timber  harvesting,  forest  regeneration,  road 
construction  and  reconstruction,  and  associated  activities  identified  in  Chapter  II. 


ISSUES 

An  interdisciplinary  team  (ID  Team)  with  members  representing  various  affected  resources  began  identifying 
the  issues  related  to  implementation  of  the  proposed  action  early  in  the  NEPA  process.  Other  agencies  with 
jurisdiction  in  the  analysis  area  were  notified  of  the  proposed  action  and  invited  to  comment.  Additional  issues 
were  identified  by  the  public  and  interested  organizations  during  the  public  involvement  scoping  process. 
Potential  issues  were  analyzed  by  the  Forest  staff  of  resource  specialists  to  determine  if  they  were  within  the 
scope  of  the  proposed  project. 

The  following  issues  were  identified  as  being  within  the  scope  of  the  proposed  project  and  were  used  to  direct 
the  creation  and  evaluation  of  the  alternatives: 

Vegetation:  This  issues  deals  with  several  topics  related  to  vegetation  management,  including:  the  effects 
to  the  age  structure,  species  abundance  and  composition,  and  growth  potential  of  the  vegetation  in  the  area; 
effects  of  the  proposed  action  on  the  insect  and  disease  susceptibility  and  the  overall  health  of  the  forest 
stands;  and  the  ability  to  manage  the  site  productivity  of  these  Management  Areas  (MAs)  to  ensure  an 
adequate  supply  of  timber  for  the  timber  products  industry  and  the  maintenance  of  employment  and 
associated  economic  activity  related  to  the  harvesting  and  processing  of  timber. 

The  indices  used  to  measure  the  effects  of  the  alternatives  on  the  vegetation  in  the  area  are:  1)  the  number 
of  acres  harvested;  2)  the  change  in  age  class  distribution  before  and  after  timber  harvest;  3)  the  number  of 
acres  of  trees  harvested;  and  3)  timber  outputs  [volume  production  in  million  board  feet  (rnrnbf)]. 

Wildlife:  Concern  has  been  expressed  about  the  potential  effects  of  the  proposed  action  on  elk  and  deer, 
particularly  elk  and  deer  security  and  elk  habitat.  Protection  of  the  area  mapped  as  key  elk  summer  range 
and  the  displacement  of  elk  and  deer  from  areas  of  preferred  habitat  are  a concern,  as  are  habitat  parameters 
such  as  the  cover  to  forage  ratio  and  road  density. 

Potential  effects  of  the  proposed  action  on  old  growth-dependent  species  such  as  goshawk  and  pine  marten, 
both  of  which  require  stands  of  trees  with  old-growth  characteristics  for  nesting  and/or  hunting,  is  also  a 
concern.  These  species  could  be  affected  by  the  proposed  management  activities,  as  stands  with  old-growth 
characteristics  would  be  harvested  under  the  action  alternatives. 

The  indices  of  measurement  that  will  be  used  to  evaluate  the  effects  of  the  alternatives  on  big  game  will  be: 
1)  changes  in  Elk  Habitat  Potential  (EHP)  (derived  from  the  cover  to  forage  ratio  and  road  density);  2)  the 
effects  to  big  game  habitat  security;  and  3)  elk  vulnerablity.  Effects  to  goshawk  and  pine  marten  will  be 
measured  by  1)  the  number  of  acres  of  timber  stands  with  old  growth  characteristics  within  the  analysis  area 
before  and  after  timber  harvest;  and  2)  the  number  of  acres  of  Forest  Plan  designated  old-growth  retention 
stands  that  are  cut. 

Roadless  Character:  Concern  has  been  expressed  about  the  potential  effects  of  the  proposed  action  on  the 
Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area.  An  estimated  9,920  acres  of  the  15,360-acre  analysis  area  are  located  within 
the  northern  portion  of  the  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area;  the  proposed  activities  would  affect  approximately 
1 6 percent  of  the  entire  roadless  area.  The  effects  of  road  construction  and  tree  harvest  on  the  social,  physical 
and  biological  attributes  of  the  roadless  area  are  a concern.  Also,  the  effects  to  the  potential  candidacy  of 
the  analysis  area  for  inclusion  in  the  National  Wilderness  Preservation  System  (NWPS)  is  a concern. 


Summary  - 3 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sate  Final  EiS 


Summary 


The  indices  of  measurement  that  will  be  used  to  measure  the  effects  of  the  proposed  action  on  the  roadless 
character  are:  1)  whether  or  not  the  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area  meets  the  qualifications  for  further 
consideration  as  a wilderness  area;  2)  number  of  acres  within  the  inventoried  roadless  area  boundary  that 
would  no  longer  be  roadless;  3)  the  percent  of  the  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area  that  is  no  longer  roadless; 
and  4)  the  effects  on  the  natural  integrity,  apparent  naturalness,  primitive  recreation,  solitude,  special 
features,  and  special  places  and  activities  of  the  area. 

Economic  Efficiency;  Concern  has  been  raised  that  Forest  management  of  timber  resources,  including  the 
proposed  project,  is  not  economically  efficient.  Some  members  of  the  public  are  concerned  that  the  proposed 
sale  should  result  in  long-term  positive  cash  flow  and  that  timber  sales  should  contain  the  most  efficient 
combination  of  logging  methods,  road  systems,  and  silvicultural  prescriptions. 

The  indices  of  measurement  for  comparison  of  the  economic  efficiency  of  the  alternatives  will  be  the  results 
of  the  economic  analysis  for  the  timber  sale  that  evaluates  the  costs  and  benefits  of  management  alternatives, 
measured  in  terms  of  1)  present  net  value  (PNV)  and  2)  the  gross  stumpage  value  realized. 

Soil  Resources:  Concern  has  been  expressed  about  the  effects  of  the  proposed  activities  on  the  soil 
resources,  particularly  effects  to  soil  productivity  due  to  increased  sedimentation  (and  subsequent  loss  of 
soil),  soil  compaction  and  soil  displacement  due  to  road  construction  and  log  skidding,  and  potential  for  mass 
wasting  of  road  cut  and  fill  slopes.  Increased  soil  erosion  could  lead  to  increased  sediment  in  streams, 
degrading  water  quality  and  fish  habitat.  Roads  and  landing  areas  can  commit  the  land  to  uses  other  than 
growing  vegetation  for  extended  periods  of  time  (total  soil  resource  commitment). 

Indices  for  measurement  of  the  effects  to  soils  are:  1 ) acres  of  total  soil  resource  commitment;  and  2)  percent 
of  analysis  area  with  total  soil  resource  commitment. 

Hydrology:  This  issue  addresses  the  concern  over  effects  of  the  proposed  timber  harvest  activities  on  water 
quality  or  volume  in  streams  in  the  analysis  area.  The  importance  of  water  quality  to  all  beneficial  uses 
downstream,  including  fisheries,  recreation,  and  domestic  and  agricultural  water  has  been  recognized.  The 
effects  of  vegetation  removal  on  the  timing  and  size  of  the  peak  flow  rate  are  also  a concern. 

The  indices  of  measurement  to  determine  effects  to  water  quality  and  volume  are:  1)  percent  of  drainages 
harvested;  2)  meeting  state  water  quality  standards;  and  3)  maintaining  beneficial  uses. 

Wetlands:  The  effects  of  the  proposed  timber  sale  on  wetlands,  particularly  as  they  relate  to  water  quality, 
was  a concern  expressed  by  some  respondents  during  the  scoping  process.  The  importance  of  wetlands  to 
maintaining  water  quality  has  been  recognized,  and  concern  was  expressed  that  timber  harvest  and  road 
construction  would  occur  in  wetland  areas  and  affect  this  function.  Recognition  and  delineation  of  wetlands 
was  also  recognized  as  important  to  maintaining  wetlands.  In  addition,  wetland  areas  serve  as  unique  habitat 
for  some  species  of  wildlife. 

The  index  of  measurement  to  determine  effects  to  wetlands  is  the  acres  of  wetlands  that  are  affected. 

Fisheries:  The  effects  of  road  construction  and  timber  harvesting  on  resident  and  anadromous  fish  spawn- 
ing, incubation,  and  rearing  habitats  is  of  great  concern  to  the  public  and  government  agencies,  including 
the  National  Marine  Fisheries  Service  and  the  Columbia  River  Inter-Tribal  Fish  Commission.  The  spring- 
summer  run  of  Chinook  salmon  has  recently  been  listed  as  Threatened  under  the  Endangered  Species  Act, 
and  habitat  for  this  fish  species  is  present  in  the  analysis  area,  although  it  is  not  currently  being  used.  Effects 
to  these  species  of  fish  or  their  habitat  as  a result  of  the  proposed  timber  sale  are  therefore  a concern. 


Summary  - 4 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Summary 


The  index  of  measurement  for  effects  to  fisheries  is  whether  anadromous  and  resident  fisheries  habitat  are 
maintained. 

Biological  Diversity:  The  effects  of  timber  harvest  activities  on  the  variety,  abundance,  and  distribution  of 
plant  and  animal  species,  the  primary  components  of  biological  diversity,  is  an  issue  arising  from  the 
accelerated  extinction  rate  for  animals  and  plants  and  an  accompanying  decrease  in  wildlife  and  plant  habitat 
world-wide. 

Threatened,  Endangered,  and  Sensitive  Species:  Effects  to  federally  listed  threatened,  endangered  and 
sensitive  species  and  to  state-listed  sensitive  species  is  a concern  for  maintenance  of  both  biological  diversity 
and  the  wildlife  resources  of  the  area.  Habitat  for  listed  threatened  spring/summer  Chinook  is  present  in  Moyer 
Creek  and  potential  habitat  is  present  in  Woodtick  Creek,  although  neither  is  used  at  present  by  this  species 
because  of  downstream  water  pollution.  In  addition,  a migration  barrier  presently  exists  at  the  mouth  of 
Woodtick  Creek.  Several  sensitive  vertebrate  species  or  their  habitat  are  present  in  the  analysis  area,  as  well 
as  sensitive  plant  species,  and  they  could  be  affected  by  vegetation  manipulation  and  road  construction. 

Potential  habitat  for  the  Endangered  gray  wolf  exists  in  the  area,  although  no  wolves  are  known  or  suspected 
to  occupy  the  area  at  this  time.  The  entire  area  is  included  within  the  Central  Idaho  Wolf  Recovery  Area  and 
may  become  important  to  this  species  at  some  point  in  the  recovery  process. 

The  indices  of  measurement  of  effects  to  these  species  are:  1)  presence  of  threatened  and  endangered 
species  or  their  habitat;  and  2)  effects  to  threatened,  endangered  or  sensitive  species  or  their  habitat. 

Visual  Resources:  This  issue  addresses  the  concern  over  visual  disturbance  from  land  management  activi- 
ties. Included  in  this  issue  is  the  concern  about  silvicultural  methods  used  and  their  effect  on  the  visual 
resource  and  the  proximity  to  sensitive  viewing  areas  such  as  the  Moyer  Creek  Road  and  the  Ridge  Road. 

The  index  of  measurement  of  effects  to  visual  resources  is  whether  the  visual  quality  objectives  are  met. 

Recreation  Resources:  Concern  over  the  effects  of  the  proposed  activities  on  the  current  recreation  use  in 
the  analysis  area  is  primarily  related  to  big  game  hunting  in  the  fall.  Access  to  the  area  is  limited,  and 
recreation  use  other  than  big  game  hunting  is  light.  The  quality  of  the  current  recreation  uses  and  the  kinds 
of  recreation  opportunities  would  change  as  a result  of  the  proposed  timber  harvest  activities,  and  how  that 
would  affect  the  amount  and  types  of  recreation  use  is  a concern. 

The  index  of  measurement  of  effects  to  recreation  use  is  the  number  of  acres  converted  from  semi-primitive 
motorized  and  non-motorized  to  roaded-natural  appearing. 

Air  Quality:  The  effects  of  the  proposed  timber  harvest  activities  on  the  air  quality  of  the  analysis  area  focuses 
on  the  effects  to  the  airshed  during  slash  burning.  Burning  may  cause  the  particulate  content  of  the  air  to 
exceed  state  air  quality  standards  and  may  affect  persons  travelling  on  the  Ridge  Road  and  other  roads  in 
the  area. 

The  indices  of  measurement  for  air  quality  are  whether  the  State  air  quality  standards  are  exceeded. 

Transportation  and  Access:  Concern  has  been  expressed  that  construction  of  the  proposed  transportation 
system  may  affect  future  use  of  the  timber  resource  in  the  area  because  more  timberland  would  be  available 
for  harvest.  Concern  has  also  been  expressed  over  closing  of  the  roads  built  for  the  timber  sale  and  access 
changes  to  the  area  due  to  closing  part  of  an  existing  primitive  jeep  trail  (Moyer  Peak  jeep  trail). 


Summary  - 5 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Summary 


Indices  for  measurement  of  the  effects  of  the  different  transportation  systems  proposed  for  the  alternatives 
are:  1)  the  number  of  acres  available  for  timber  harvesting  with  the  existing  road  system;  2)  the  number  of 
acres  available  for  timber  harvesting  with  the  proposed  road  systems;  3)  the  miles  of  road  that  would  be 
constructed  or  reconstructed;  and  4)  miles  of  open  road  and  closed  road  in  the  analysis  area. 

Minerals:  This  issue  addresses  the  concern  over  the  effects  of  timber  harvest  on  access  to  and  development 
of  the  mineral  resources  of  the  analysis  area. 

The  index  of  measurement  for  effects  to  mineral  resources  is  whether  the  proposed  actions  prohibit  future 
mineral  resources  development  in  the  area. 

Cultural  Resources:  Concern  for  the  effects  to  cultural  resources  in  the  analysis  area  addresses  the  effects 
of  increased  access  into  the  area  and  the  potential  for  vandalism  of  these  resource.  In  addition,  ground 
disturbance  associated  with  the  timber  sale  may  affect  cultural  resources. 

The  index  of  measurement  of  effects  to  cultural  resources  is  whether  or  not  impacts  will  occur. 

Range  Resources:  The  issue  of  the  effects  of  the  proposed  timber  harvest  on  range  resources  reflects  the 
concern  that  improving  access  and  increasing  forage  may  increase  grazing  in  the  area,  or  may  reduce 
livestock  use  if  fencing  livestock  out  of  areas  is  necessary.  These  changes  can  alter  grazing  levels,  livestock 
use  patterns,  and  rangeland  conditions. 

The  index  of  measurement  for  range  resources  is  the  effects  on  range  condition. 


ALTERNATIVES 


ALTERNATIVES  CONSIDERED  BUT  NOT  GIVEN  DETAILED  STUDY 

The  ID  Team  considered  the  following  alternatives  and  options  during  the  analysis  process,  but  they  eliminat- 
ed them  from  detailed  study  for  the  reasons  described  below: 


* Use  the  preferred  alternative  Identified  In  the  Moyer  Salt  Environmental  Assessment  (1 983)  as  the 
proposed  action  for  this  Draft  EIS. 

In  1 982  the  Forest  Service  proposed  timber  harvesting  and  road  construction  in  the  Woodtick  Creek  and  Salt 
Creek  drainages  (the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale)  that  would  harvest  4 to  8 mrnbf  from  1 ,000  to  1 ,400  acres.  An 
Environmental  Assessment  (EA)  was  approved  that  documented  an  environmental  evaluation  of  the  pro- 
posed timber  harvesting  and  road  construction  with  a reasonable  range  of  management  action  alternatives 
(U.S.  Forest  Service  1 982).  This  evaluation  did  not  assess  the  effects  of  the  proposed  action  on  the  roadless 
character  of  the  area.  A Finding  of  No  Significant  Impact  (FONSI)  and  Decision  Notice  were  signed  by  the 
Forest  Supervisor  in  May,  1983.  The  timber  sale  was  marked  and  offered  for  sale  but  was  not  purchased  due 
to  depressed  timber  prices  in  the  mid-1980s.  In  1988  the  Forest  Plan  was  approved;  it  designated  the  Moyer 
Salt  Timber  Sale  area  as  an  area  where  timber  harvesting  could  occur.  In  1 991  the  decision  was  made  to  enter 
the  area  for  timber  harvesting.  The  timber  harvesting  and  road  construction  activities  proposed  in  the  original 
Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  were  modified  to  meet  the  current  standards  and  guidelines  of  the  Forest  Plan,  and 
are  contained  in  the  proposed  alternative  (Alternative  II  in  this  document). 


Summary  - 6 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Summary 


* Complete  a separate  EIS  analysis  for  each  of  two  timber  sales  originally  proposed  In  the  Moyer  Salt 
Timber  Sale  EIS  analysis  area. 

As  originally  stated  in  the  1 988  Forest  Plan,  two  separate  timber  sales  were  proposed  for  what  is  now  the 
Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale:  the  Moyer-Salt  Timber  Sale  and  the  Salt  Creek  Timber  Sale.  These  two  timber  sales 
were  combined  into  a single  sale,  primarily  to  facilitate  control  of  timing  of  road  construction  and  timber 
han/esting  in  big  game  subdivisions.  The  two  timber  sales  were  not  offered  and  their  effects  were  not  analyzed 
separately  because:  1)  this  approach  would  not  yield  a clear  disclosure  of  the  potential  environmental  effects 
from  the  proposed  action;  2)  it  would  not  be  cost  efficient;  and  3)  roads  built  to  access  the  Salt  Creek  portion 
of  the  timber  sale  would  also  access  the  Moyer  Salt  portion;  therefore,  analyzing  the  effects  of  the  two  sales 
separately  would  be  partially  redundant  and  an  inefficient  use  of  time  and  resources. 


* Harvest  timber  only  outside  the  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area. 

Comments  to  the  DEIS  suggested  that  we  analyze  this  alternative.  Our  reason  for  dismissing  further  analysis 
follows.  Nearly  50%  of  the  Salmon  National  Forest’s  suitable  timber  base  is  located  in  roadless  areas.  The 
Forest  Plan  identified  roadless  lands  within  this  analysis  area  as  suitable  for  timber  harvest.  Failure  to  consider 
harvesting  in  roadless  areas  would  lead  to  overcutting  of  nonroadless  lands  based  on  the  current  Allowable 
Sale  Quantity.  One  of  the  purposes  of  this  EIS  is  to  address  the  effects  of  timber  harvest  activities  on  the 
roadless  resource,  thus  this  alternative  would  be  outside  the  scope  of  this  document.  The  No  Action 
alternative  approximates  this  alternative  and  if  selected  would  allow  the  option  to  consider  any  number  of 
timber  sales  outside  the  roadless  area. 


* Prescribed  burn  alternative  to  address  the  forest  health  concern®. 

Due  to  public  comments  received  after  release  of  the  DEIS,  a prescribed  burn  alternative  was  considered  but 
is  outside  the  scope  of  this  EIS  because  it  does  not  meet  the  purpose  of  contributing,  in  part,  to  the  Forest 
Plan  objective  of  satisfying  the  commercial  demand  for  timber.  The  Draft  EIS,  on  page  1-1  states:  "The 
proposed  action  alternatives  are  designed  to  help  provide  a continuous  flow  of  raw  materials  to  dependent 
manufacturing  communities  and  thereby  provide  community  stability.  It  is  also  designed  to  enable  the  public 
to  gather  firewood.  All  the  proposed  action  alternatives  are  consistent  with  maintaining  the  customs  and 
cultures  of  these  communities." 

* Helicopter  log  1 70  acres  of  Douglas-fir  units  and  conventionally  log  580  acres,  requiring  1 5.8  miles 
of  road  (2.5  miles  In  Wildlife  Area  S and  13.3  miles  In  SI)  with  an  estimated  yield  of  6.0  MW1BF. 

Due  to  public  comments  received  after  release  of  the  DEIS,  this  alternative  was  considered  but  dropped  from 
further  analysis  due  to  the  increased  costs  of  logging  and  transportation,  and  the  relatively  minor  benefits 
to  wildlife. 

* Helicopter  logging  the  Douglas-fir  units  (170  acres)  and  conventionally  log  170  acres,  requiring 
13.8  miles  of  road  (only  0.5  miles  of  road  In  Wildlife  area  I to  access  hell-spot  and  all  conventional 
units  dropped  In  this  area)  with  an  estimated  yield  of  4.0  MMBF. 

This  alternative  like  the  previous  one,  was  considered  because  of  public  comments  received  after  release  of 
the  DEIS,  but  was  dropped  from  further  analysis  due  to  the  increased  costs  of  logging  and  transportation, 
and  the  relatively  minor  benefits  to  wildlife. 


Summary  - 7 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Summary 


ALTERNATIVES  PROPOSED  FOR  THE  MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Seven  alternatives  were  developed,  a no-action  alternative  and  six  action  alternatives.  Each  action  alternative 
represents  a different  combination  of  timber  harvest  and  road  building  intensity,  as  well  as  slightly  different 
methods  for  mitigating  their  effects.  These  alternatives  were  designed  to  meet  the  issues  and  concerns 
identified  during  scoping  while  at  least  partially  meeting  the  purpose  of  and  need  for  action  defined  previous- 
ly, and  represent  a reasonable  range  of  actions  to  accomplish  those  goals. 

Harvest  treatments  prescribed  for  the  proposed  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  apply  even-aged  silvicultural  systems 
because  these  methods  best  meet  the  Management  Area  goals  for  the  area  established  in  the  Forest  Plan 
(pp.  IV-32).  Standard  harvest  methods  for  even-aged  management  of  forests  include  clearcutting,  seed  tree, 
and  shelterwood  methods.  Clearcutting  and  shelterwood  or  variations  of  the  shelterwood  system  are  the 
optimum  even-aged  silvicultural  methods  for  treating  stand  conditions  in  the  Moyer  Salt  analysis  area. 

Cieareut  Harvest 


Standard  clearcutting  would  be  applied  in  areas  with  heavy  fuel  loadings,  where  residual  overstory  or 
understory  trees  can’t  be  protected  while  harvesting,  in  areas  susceptible  to  windthrow,  and  in  stands 
infected  with  dwarf  mistletoe.  These  conditions  are  found  on  subalpine  fir  habitat  types  consisting  of  relatively 
pure  stands  of  lodgepole  pine  or  mixed  stands  of  lodgepole  pine,  subalpine  fir,  and  Engelmann  spruce.  Even 
when  it  is  possible  to  skid  logs  and  save  a residual  stand,  it  is  often  not  possible  to  dispose  of  the  slash  without 
clearcutting.  However,  wherever  feasible,  healthy  residual  understory  trees  will  be  left.  This  method  would  be 
utilized  in  Alternatives  2,  3,  4,  and  5. 

Alternatives  6 and  2A  would  utilize  clearcutting  with  islands  in  order  to  meet  visual  quality  objectives  and 
mitigate  other  resource  concerns.  Where  clearcutting  is  prescribed,  many  of  the  stands  would  have  approxi- 
mately 15%  of  the  area  within  the  unit  left  in  uncut  islands  ranging  from  1/2  an  acre  to  one  acre  in  size.  With 
heavy  fuel  loadings,  such  as  those  found  in  the  analysis  area,  the  retention  of  islands  is  the  only  practical 
and  economically  feasible  alternative  to  standard  clearcutting. 

Regardless  of  which  method  is  applied,  there  would  be  a variety  of  common  treatments.  Most  units  would 
be  logged  using  tractor  skidding  methods;  units  with  slopes  too  steep  for  tractor  logging  would  be  logged 
with  a cable  system. 

After  the  trees  have  been  removed  from  a site,  a variety  of  activities  would  occur  on  the  site  that  are  designed 
to  promote  seedling  establishment,  improve  timber  stand  conditions  and  reduce  the  amount  of  combustible 
material  laying  on  the  ground  (fuel  loading).  Slash  would  be  piled  by  tractors  on  sites  with  slopes  less  than 
45  percent.  In  addition,  ten  to  fifteen  tons  of  slash  would  be  left  evenly  scattered  on  each  acre  in  order  to 
provide  microsites  that  enhance  seedling  establishment  and  survival,  ensure  long-term  soil  productivity  and 
provide  habitat  for  insects  and  animals.  Any  remaining  unhealthy  trees  and  insect-infected  understory  trees 
that  were  not  pushed  over  during  the  piling  process  would  be  hand  felled  in  order  to  increase  growing  space 
and  completely  remove  any  disease  source.  All  remaining  healthy  understory  trees  would  be  maintained. 
Existing  snags  (large  standing  dead  trees)  and  recruitment  snags  (trees  that  would  be  retained  as  future 
snags  trees)  would  be  maintained  as  per  Forest  Plan  direction. 

During  logging,  branches,  tree  tops,  and  small  trees  (slash)  would  be  cut  to  lengths  such  that  the  slash  would 
lie  on  the  ground  at  depths  of  less  than  1.5  feet.  In  some  areas  this  material  would  be  made  available  to  the 
public  and  commercial  firewood  gatherers  for  a designated  time  period  after  logging  operations  are  complete. 
After  firewood  gathering,  the  slash  would  be  burned  to  increase  available  growing  space,  to  reduce  the 
amount  of  dead  material  on  the  ground  and  thereby  to  reduce  potential  for  wildfires,  and  to  assist  in  the 


Summary  - 8 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Summary 


breakdown  of  woody  material  and  increase  soil  productivity.  Clearcut  units  on  slopes  steeper  than  45  percent 
would  be  broadcast  burned  (burned  without  piling) ; on  slopes  less  than  45  percent  the  slash  would  be  burned 
in  piles.  Firelines  would  be  constructed  around  harvest  units  to  reduce  the  possibilities  of  fire  escape  during 
burning.  Burning  would  be  controlled  so  that  1 0 to  1 5 tons  per  acre  of  slash  material,  including  larger  diameter 
pieces  of  slash,  would  be  retained  to  provide  microsite  protection,  ensure  soil  productivity  and  maintain 
habitat  for  those  organisms  requiring  down  woody  debris. 

Natural  seed  sprouting  would  reforest  the  clearcut  units.  Natural  seeding  and  regeneration  of  timber  harvest 
cutting  units  on  similar  sites  elsewhere  in  the  Salmon  National  Forest  has  been  successful.  Clearcuts  would 
be  planted  if  reforestation  by  natural  means  is  not  successful.  Timing  of  harvesting  and  slash  disposal  would 
be  adjusted  to  ensure  that  the  pine  cones  have  dropped  their  seeds  before  the  slash  is  piled. 

Machine  site  preparation  such  as  scarification  would  be  used  in  units  where  grasses,  sedges,  or  shrubs  are 
present  that  may  prevent  or  prolong  seedling  establishment.  On  approximately  50  to  1 00  acres  of  clearcutting 
units,  a specially  designed  tractor  blade  will  be  used  to  overturn  the  sod  layer  and  to  loosen  the  top  soil  of 
an  area  in  order  to  create  a mineral  soil  seedbed  where  tree  seeds  can  germinate. 

Shelterwood  Harvest 


In  stands  where  there  are  no  young  trees  present  on  the  site  or  where  those  that  are  present  are  unhealthy 
(they  are  infested  with  insects  and  diseases  or  will  not  grow  if  the  competing  trees  are  removed),  a standard 
shelterwood  method  would  be  uniformly  implemented  (designated  as  "shelterwood"  on  Alternative  maps). 
The  initial  entry  would  apply  the  seed  cut  of  the  shelterwood  in  which  approximately  fifty  to  seventy  percent 
of  the  overstory  depending  on  site  conditions.  The  remaining  "leave  trees"  would  be  expected  to  regenerate 
the  site  within  1 0-1 5 years.  The  actual  time  necessary  to  regenerate  these  sites  would  vary  depending  upon 
whether  the  topography  was  suitable  for  the  application  of  machine  scarification.  Once  regeneration  is 
established,  a removal  cut  of  the  shelter  wood  would  be  made  leaving  three  to  five  large  trees  per  acre  for 
snag  replacement  or  future  harvest. 

In  stands  where  there  are  healthy  young  trees  on  the  site  that  will  grow  if  competing  trees  are  removed,  a 
group  shelterwood  method  would  be  implemented  (designated  as  group  shelterwood  on  maps).  Stands 
where  this  method  is  proposed  are  characterized  by  three  distinct  components: 

1 . A Douglas-fir  overstory  with  an  understory  of  Douglas-fir  seedlings  and  saplings  ranging  from  two  to 
six  feet  tall; 

2.  A Douglas-fir  overstory  with  an  occasional  clump  of  regeneration  but  generally  park  like  in  appear- 
ance; 

3.  Thick  patches  of  advanced  Douglas-fir  regeneration  (pole  size  material  3.0  - 8.9  inches  DBH). 

These  three  components  create  a mosaic  of  even-aged  groups.  The  objective  of  the  group  shelterwood 
method  is  to  maintain  these  components  as  even-aged  groups,  thereby  replicating  nature’s  reproduction 
system.  In  the  initial  entry,  this  method  takes  advantage  of  the  existing  regeneration  present.  Where  a suitable 
understory  is  present,  a removal  cut  of  the  shelterwood  would  be  performed  to  release  existing  regeneration. 
Where  regeneration  is  lacking,  the  seed  cut  of  a shelterwood  would  be  implemented  removing  approximately 
50  to  70  percent  of  the  overstory  depending  on  site  conditions.  Where  existing  patches  of  Douglas-fir 
regeneration  is  encountered  a combination  of  precommercial  and  commercial  thinning  would  be  applied. 

In  order  to  meet  visual  quality  objectives  and  mitigate  other  resource  concerns,  many  of  the  units  in 
Alternatives  5, 6 and  2A  will  be  treated  utilizing  a modified  irregular  shelterwood  system  (designated  "irregular 
shelterwood"  on  the  Alternative  maps).  This  method  would  be  initially  similar  to  the  standard  and  group 
shelterwood  methods  described  for  Alternatives  2,  3 and  4.  The  primary  difference  is  that  the  shelterwood 


Summary  - 9 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sale  Final  EiS 


Summary 


trees  are  retained  longer  than  necessary  for  seedling  establishment  thus  delaying  the  timing  of  the  second 
entry  into  the  stand.  The.  removal  cut  (second  entry)  of  the  shelterwood,  would  not  be  performed  until  the 
average  height  of  the  regeneration  is  approximately  20  feet.  The  removal  cut  would  therefore  occur  approxi- 
mately 20  to  30  years  after  the  seed  cut  as  compared  to  1 0 to  1 5 years  when  employing  the  standard  or  group 
shelterwood. 

Regardless  of  which  method  is  applied  there  would  be  a variety  of  common  treatments.  Most  units  would  be 
logged  using  tractor  skidding  methods.  Units  with  slopes  greater  than  45  percent  would  be  logged  using  a 
cable  system. 

Machine  scarification  and  slash  piling  by  dozer  would  be  performed  as  one  operation  in  areas  where  a 
shelterwood  seed  cut  is  made.  Fifty  percent  of  these  areas  would  be  scarified  by  alternating  strips  of  treated 
and  untreated  ground.  Slash  would  be  lopped  and  scattered  prior  to  the  scarification  process.  It  would  be 
evenly  redistributed  during  the  scarification  process.  These  treatments  would  not  be  possible  under  Alterna- 
tive 5 due  to  lack  of  road  access.  In  cable  units  that  are  too  steep  to  pile  or  scarify,  the  slash  would  be  lopped 
and  scattered  or  jackpot  burned  (areas  where  slash  has  accumulated  in  piles  (jackpots)  would  be  burned). 
In  areas  where  a removal  cut,  slash  would  be  lopped  and  scattered.  No  piling  or  burning  would  occur  in  order 
to  protect  healthy  trees  present  on  the  site. 

Young  trees  left  in  shelterwood  units  would  be  thinned  (a  cutting  is  made  in  the  overstocked  stands  to  bring 
stocking  to  the  desired  level  and  to  increase  growth  in  remaining  trees).  Trees  that  are  damaged  or  unhealthy 
would  be  cut  down  by  hand  in  order  to  provide  growing  space  for  new  trees. 


ALTERNATIVE  1 - NO  ACTION 

The  No  Action  alternative  would  not  initiate  any  activities;  present  resource  management  activities  would 
continue,  but  the  proposed  project  activities  would  not  be  implemented. 

The  goal  of  this  alternative  is  to  maintain  the  area’s  undeveloped  condition  and  current  uses  (see  Figure  11-1). 
This  alternative  provides  a baseline  to  compare  the  effects  of  the  action  alternatives,  and  responds  to  the 
roadless  issue,  or  the  desire  to  maintain  the  area  in  a roadless  condition.  Because  the  existing  environment 
is  not  static,  environmental  consequences  will  still  occur;  natural  events  such  as  wildfire,  insect  and  disease 
infestations,  or  flooding  could  appreciably  alter  most  of  the  resources  that  are  discussed  in  this  document. 


Summary  - 10 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Summary 


ALTERNATIVE  2 

This  alternative  was  used  in  the  internal  and  public  scoping  process  in  an  effort  to  implement  Forest  Plan 
direction  and  to  identify  issues  which  other  alternatives  are  designed  to  address.  This  alternative  emphasizes 
timber  harvesting  and  natural  regeneration  that  would  improve  the  health  and  vigor  of  the  forest  while  meeting 
all  other  resource  needs. 

Sale  layout  would  be  designed  to  meet  resource  objectives  by  limiting  unit  size,  shape,  and  total  acres 
treated.  Optimum  treatment  of  insect  and  disease  conditions,  and  economic  efficiency  of  harvesting  may  not 
occur  in  order  that  standards  and  guidelines  for  other  resources  may  be  met.  Emphasis  would  be  on 
maximizing  sawlog  production  for  those  areas  treated.  In  this  alternative,  the  entire  area  would  be  accessed 
from  one  road,  an  extension  of  Forest  Service  Road  106  (Swan  Peak  Road)  (Figure  11-2). 

Total  area  that  would  be  treated  (acres) 

568 

Total  volume  that  would  be  harvested  (mmbf) 

4.9 

Miles  of  road 

Constructed: 

16.8 

Reconstructed: 

1.3 

Number  of  cutting  units 

Douglas-fir 

7 

Lodgepole  pine  or  mixed  lodgepole  pine, 

25 

subalpine  fir  and  Engelmann  spruce 

Clearcut  Cutting  Methods: 

Amount  clearcut  (acres) 

410 

Logging  Methods: 

tractor  (acres) 

400 

cable  (acres) 

10 

Slash  Disposal  Method: 

piled  and  burned  (acres) 

310 

broadcast  burned  (acres) 

100 

Machine  Scarification  (acres) 

50-100 

Shelterwood  Cutting  Method: 

Amount  Shelterwood  (acres) 

158 

Logging  Methods: 

tractor  (acres) 

144 

cable  (acres) 

14 

Slash  Disposal  Method: 

piled  and  burned  (acres) 

* 

broadcast  burned  (acres) 

0 

Machine  Scarification  (acres) 

144 

* Slash  will  be  lopped,  scattered  and  redistributed  during  the  scarification  process.  Only  concentrations  may 

be  burned. 

Summary  - 1 1 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  E1S 


Summary 


In  addition  to  the  mitigation  measures  common  to  all  the  action  alternatives,  the  following  mitigation  applies: 

Slash  will  be  placed  from  right-of-way  windrow  back  on  road  prism  to  form  'jackpot'  type  piles  with 
a minimum  diameter  of  25  feet  and  an  average  height  of  4 to  6 feet  after  completion  of  timber  removal 
and  during  slash  disposal.  The  timber  sale  contract  will  contain  provisions  for  this  procedure. 

Piles  will  be  placed  at  1 00  to  200  foot  (avg.  of  1 50  foot)  intervals,  will  extend  from  cutslope  to  fill  slope, 
and  will  be  of  sufficient  magnitude  and  continuity  to  discourage  all  travel  on  the  road  prism  by  humans 
on  foot  and/or  horseback.  Openings  created  in  the  windrows  by  construction  of  these  piles  will  serve 
as  big  game  travelways  and  should  not  have  residual  slash  in  excess  of  1 8 inches  high. 

A map  showing  the  roads  (last  1/2  mile  of  Road  # 60286.1  and  on  all  of  roads  60286.2,  60286-C  and 
60288)  where  slash  piling  will  occur  is  contained  in  the  Project  File. 

For  water  quality  protection,  windrows  will  not  be  disturbed  where  the  distance  from  the  toe  of  the 
fill  slope  to  live  water  is  less  than  200  feet. 


Summary  - 12 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Summary 


ALTERNATIVE  3 

This  alternative  was  developed  to  respond  to  concerns  about  the  effects  of  the  proposed  action  on  wildlife, 
in  particular  the  effects  on  key  elk  summer  range.  This  alternative  was  developed  with  substantive  input 
provided  during  the  public  comment  period  by  members  of  the  public  . 

This  alternative  eliminates  1 1 clearcuts  totaling  1 70  acres  contained  in  Alternative  II  and  adds  two  clearcuts 
totaling  30  acres  (Figure  11-3).  Access  to  the  analysis  area  would  be  from  two  roads:  cutting  units  in  the 
Woodtick  Creek  area  would  be  accessed  by  a road  extending  from  the  existing  F.S.  Road  106,  and  those 
in  the  Salt  Creek  and  ■Perm"  Creek  area  would  be  accessed  by  a road  extending  from  existing  F.S.  Road  1 07. 
The  existing  roads  would  be  reconstructed  to  Forest  road  specifications.  This  configuration,  with  fewer 
clearcuts  and  access  by  two  roads,  would  provide  a large  area  in  the  center  of  the  analysis  area  in  which 
no  harvesting  or  road  building  would  take  place. 

Total  area  that  would  be  treated  (acres) 

440 

Total  volume  that  would  be  harvested  (mnrtbf) 

3.75 

Miles  of  road 

Constructed: 

14.6 

Reconstructed: 

9.3 

Number  of  cutting  units 

Douglas-fir 

9 

Lodgepole  pine  or  mixed  lodgepole  pine, 

16 

subalpine  fir  and  Engelmann  spruce 

Clearcut  Cutting  Methods: 

Amount  clearcut  (acres) 

270 

Logging  Methods: 

tractor  (acres) 

260 

cable  (acres) 

10 

Slash  Disposal  Method: 

piled  and  burned  (acres) 

150 

broadcast  burned  (acres) 

120 

Machine  Scarification  (acres) 

50-100 

Shelterwood  Cutting  Method: 

Amount  Shelterwood  (acres) 

170 

Logging  Methods: 

tractor  (acres) 

144 

cable  (acres) 

26 

Slash  Disposal  Method: 

piled  and  burned 

* 

broadcast  burned 

0 

Machine  Scarification  (acres) 

144 

Summary  - 13 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  E1S 


Summary 


* Slash  will  be  lopped,  scattered  and  redistributed  during  the  scarification  process.  Only  concentrations  may 
be  burned. 

In  addition  to  the  mitigation  measures  common  to  all  the  action  alternatives,  the  following  mitigation  applies: 

Slash  will  be  placed  from  right-of-way  windrow  back  on  road  prism  to  form  'jackpot'  type  piles  with 
a minimum  diameter  of  25  feet  and  an  average  height  of  4 to  6 feet  after  completion  of  timber  removal 
and  during  slash  disposal.  The  timber  sale  contract  will  contain  provisions  for  this  procedure. 

Piles  will  be  placed  at  1 00  to  200  foot  (avg.  of  1 50  foot)  intervals,  will  extend  from  cutslope  to  fill  slope, 
and  will  be  of  sufficient  magnitude  and  continuity  to  discourage  all  travel  on  the  road  prism  by  humans 
on  foot  and/or  horseback.  Openings  created  in  the  windrows  by  construction  of  these  piles  will  serve 
as  big  game  travelways  and  should  not  have  residual  slash  in  excess  of  1 8 inches  high. 

A map  showing  the  roads  (last  1/2  mile  of  Road  # 60286.1  and  on  all  of  roads  60286.2,  60286-C  and 
60288)  where  slash  piling  will  occur  is  contained  in  the  Project  File. 

For  water  quality  protection,  windrows  will  not  be  disturbed  where  the  distance  from  the  toe  of  the 
fill  slope  to  live  water  is  less  than  200  feet. 


Summary  - 14 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  FinaS  EIS 


Summary 


ALTERNATIVE  4 

This  alternative  was  developed  to  respond  to  concerns  about  the  economic  viability  of  the  other  action 
alternatives  and  their  effectiveness  in  treating  insect  and  disease  conditions  within  the  project  area.  Alternative 
4 implements  the  timber  management  direction  of  the  Forest  Plan  to  its  fullest  and  may  not  meet  resource 
objectives  for  other  resources. 

Most  of  the  cable  logging  units  contained  in  Alternatives  2 and  3 would  be  eliminated  in  order  to  increase 
the  economic  efficiency  of  the  proposed  action  (Figure  11-4).  Cutting  unit  size  was  determined  by  Forest  Plan 
Silvicultural  and  Insect  and  Disease  standards  and  guidelines  that  are  designed  to  maximize  growth,  health, 
and  vigor  and  minimize  insect  and  disease  infestation  of  the  treated  stands.  Clearcut  cutting  unit  size  may 
reach  60  acres  in  lodgepole  pine  stands  where  dwarf  mistletoe  levels  are  high  (unit  # 22).  Shelterwood  unit 
size  in  Douglas-fir  stands,  designed  to  control  Douglas-fir  beetle  and  Western  spruce  budworm,  would 
exceed  40  acres  (unit  # 30).  The  size  of  these  units  was  determined  by  the  amount  and  size  of  existing  natural 
regeneration  and  the  size  of  natural  openings  used  by  big  game. 

Total  area  that  would  be  treated  (acres) 

847 

Total  volume  that  would  be  harvested  (mmbf) 

6.9 

Miles  of  road 

Constructed: 

17.8 

Reconstructed: 

9.3 

Number  of  cutting  units 

Douglas-fir 

5 

Lodgepole  pine  or  mixed  lodgepole  pine, 

25 

subalpine  fir  and  Engelmann  spruce 

Clearcut  Cutting  Methods: 

Amount  clearcut  (acres) 

645 

Logging  Methods: 

tractor  (acres) 

645 

cable  (acres) 

0 

Slash  Disposal  Method: 

piled  and  burned  (acres) 

545 

broadcast  burned  (acres) 

100 

Machine  Scarification  (acres) 

50-100 

Shelterwood  Cutting  Method: 

Amount  Shelterwood  (acres) 

202 

Logging  Methods: 

tractor  (acres) 

202 

cable  (acres) 

0 

Slash  Disposal  Method: 

piled  and  burned 

* 

broadcast  burned 

0 

Machine  Scarification  (acres) 

202 

Summary  - 15 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sale  Final  ESS 


Summary 


* Slash  will  be  lopped,  scattered  and  redistributed  during  the  scarification  process.  Only  concentrations  may 
be  burned. 

In  addition  to  the  mitigation  measures  common  to  all  the  action  alternatives,  the  following  mitigation  applies: 

Slash  will  be  placed  from  right-of-way  windrow  back  on  road  prism  to  form  "jackpot"  type  piles  with 
a minimum  diameter  of  25  feet  and  an  average  height  of  4 to  6 feet  after  completion  of  timber  removal 
and  during  slash  disposal.  The  timber  sale  contract  will  contain  provisions  for  this  procedure. 

Piles  will  be  placed  at  1 00  to  200  foot  (avg.  of  1 50  foot)  intervals,  will  extend  from  cutslope  to  fill  slope, 
and  will  be  of  sufficient  magnitude  and  continuity  to  discourage  all  travel  on  the  road  prism  by  humans 
on  foot  and/or  horseback.  Openings  created  in  the  windrows  by  construction  of  these  piles  will  serve 
as  big  game  travelways  and  should  not  have  residual  slash  in  excess  of  1 8 inches  high. 

A map  showing  the  roads  (last  1/2  mile  of  Road  # 60286.1  and  on  all  of  roads  60286.2,  60286-C  and 
60288)  where  slash  piling  will  occur  is  contained  in  the  Project  File. 

For  water  quality  protection,  windrows  will  not  be  disturbed  where  the  distance  from  the  toe  of  the 
fill  slope  to  live  water  is  less  than  200  feet. 


Summary  - 16 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Summary 


ALTERNATIVE  5 

This  alternative  was  developed  in  response  to  comments  received  on  the  DEIS.  It  is  intended  to  respond  to 
requests  that  *a  no  roads  access  for  timber  harvest  be  considered  and  that  an  alternative  be  considered  that 
'addresses  harvesting  less  than  3.0  MMBF  and  constructing  less  than  10  miles  of  road. 

This  alternative  contains  4 clearcuts  and  3 shelterwood  units  totaling  approximately  292  acres  (Figure  11-5). 
Access  to  the  analysis  area  would  be  from  existing  F.S.  Road  1 07.  The  existing  roads  would  be  reconstructed 
to  Forest  road  specifications.  Approximately  1.15  miles  of  new  roads  would  be  required  to  facilitate  harvest. 
Units  1 W,  2W,  3W  and  4W  would  be  tractor  logged  clearcuts  while  units  S6,  S1 1 , and  30  would  be  helicopter 
logged  utilizing  the  standard  and  irregular  shelterwood  silvicultural  methods.  Shelterwood  harvest  units 
contained  in  Alternatives  2,  3 and  4 include  machine  scarification  and  slash  piling  as  part  of  the  prescribed 
silvicultural  system.  These  treatments  would  not  be  possible  under  this  alternative  due  to  lack  of  road  access. 
The  inability  to  perform  machine  scarification  and  slash  piling  will  result  in  delayed  regeneration  periods  and 
fuel  loadings  that  may  hinder  big  game  movement  ( please  refer  to  chapter  IV  - Environmental  Consequences 
for  a full  disclosure  off  effects). 


Total  area  that  would  be  treated  (acres)  292 

Total  volume  that  would  be  harvested  (mmbf)  1.79 

Miles  of  road 

Constructed:  1.15 

Reconstructed:  8.0 

Number  of  cutting  units 

Douglas-fir  3 

Lodgepole  pine  or  mixed  lodgepole  pine,  4 

subalpine  fir  and  Engelmann  spruce 

Clearcut  Cutting  Methods: 

Amount  clearcut  (acres)  124 

Logging  Methods: 

tractor  (acres)  124 

helicopter  (acres)  0 

Slash  Disposal  Method: 

piled  and  burned  (acres)  124 

broadcast  burned  (acres)  0 

Machine  Scarification  (acres)  0 

Sheiterwood  Cutting  Method: 

Amount  Shelterwood  (acres)  1 68 

Logging  Methods: 

tractor  (acres)  0 

helicopter  (acres)  168 

Slash  Disposal  Method: 

lop  and  scatter  1 68 

broadcast  burned  0 

Machine  Scarification  (acres)  0 


Summary  - 17 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sate  Fina!  ESS 


Summary 


In  addition  to  the  mitigation  measures  common  to  all  the  action  alternatives,  the  following  mitigations  apply: 

1 . The  helicopter  service  landing  will  have  an  impermeable  liner  placed  under  the  fuel  storage  area; 

2.  A physical  barrier  of  sufficient  height  to  contain  any  spilled  hazardous  substance  will  be  placed 
around  the  helicopter  service  landing;  and 

3.  Restrict  fuel  hauling  for  the  helicopter  to  trucks  without  a trailer. 


Summary  - 18 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Summary 


ALTERNATIVE  6 (PREFERRED) 

This  alternative  was  developed  in  order  to  provide  a balance  between  concerns  for  visual  quality  and  insect 
and  disease  conditions  (Figure  11-6).  In  the  lodgepole  community  where  clearcutting  is  proposed,  Forest  Plan 
standards  and  guidelines  for  visual  quality  would  be  achieved  through  a combination  of  unit  size  and  leaving 
uncut  islands  ( where  slopes  permit  approximately  15%  of  the  area  within  the  clearcuts  would  be  left  in  uncut 
islands  ranging  from  1/2  to  1 acre  in  size).  Where  necessary  to  meet  visual  quality  objectives  in  the  Douglas-fir 
community,  timber  stands  would  be  harvested  using  an  irregular  shelterwood  method.  This  method  takes 
advantage  of  existing  natural  regeneration  and  in  some  cases  will  maintain  four  distinct  age  classes  and 
canopy  levels. 

The  island  concept  would  be  feasible  in  16  of  the  26  proposed  clearcuts  (units  1 W,  2W,  3W,  4W,  13,  19, 19A, 
19B,  20,  21,  22,  23,  25,  26,  28,  Si  2).  Leaving  islands  within  units  containing  steep  slopes  and  heavy  fuel 
loadings  (as  in  Alternative  2A)  would  not  be  attempted.  Units  22  and  23  will  leave  approximately  30%  of  the 
area  within  the  clearcuts  in  islands  approximately  1 acre  in  size.  The  other  units  mentioned  above  will  have 
approximately  1 5%  of  the  area  within  the  clearcuts  in  islands  approximately  1 acre  in  size.  As  an  example  unit 
22  (20  acres)  would  have  approximately  6 islands  designated  (1  acre  in  size)  thus  the  treated  area  would  be 
reduced  to  14  acres.  Unit  1W  (23  acres)  would  have  approximately  3 islands  designated  (1  acre  in  size)  thus 
the  treated  area  would  be  reduced  to  approximately  20  acres. 

The  purpose  of  leaving  the  islands  is  five-fold: 

1 . Provide  a regenerated  stand  that  more  closely  approximates  the  species  mix  currently  occupying 
the  site; 

2.  To  break  up  the  units  in  order  to  provide  a more  visually  pleasing  setting  when  seen  from  a 
background  or  landscape  view; 

3.  Provide  big  game  bedding  sites  within  the  newly  created  forage  area; 

4.  Break  up  site  distances  within  the  units  to  increase  security  and  thus  use  by  big  game;  and 

5.  Ensure  protection  of  snags  and  retention  trees  that  may  otherwise  be  pushed  over  or  damaged 
during  the  skidding  and  piling  process. 


Total  area  within  harvest  units  (acres)  815 

Total  area  that  would  be  treated  (acres)  747 

Total  volume  that  would  be  harvested  (mmbf)  6.10 

Miles  of  road 

Constructed:  17.8 

Reconstructed:  9.3 

Number  of  cutting  units 

Douglas-fir  4 

Lodgepole  pine  or  mixed  lodgepole  pine,  26 

subalpine  fir  and  Engelmann  spruce 


Summary  - 19 


Moyer  Salt  Umber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Summary 


Clearcut  Cutting  Methods: 


Amount  clearcut  (acres) 

545 

Logging  Methods: 

tractor  (acres) 

545 

cable  (acres) 

0 

Slash  Disposal  Method: 

piled  and  burned  (acres) 

445 

broadcast  burned  (acres) 

100 

Machine  Scarification  (acres) 

50-100 

Sheiterwood  Cutting  Methods: 

Amount  Shelterwood  (acres) 

202 

Logging  Methods: 

tractor  (acres) 

202 

cable  (acres) 

0 

Slash  Disposal  Method: 

piled  and  burned  (acres) 

* 

broadcast  burned  (acres) 

0 

Machine  Scarification  (acres) 

202 

* Slash  will  be  lopped,  scattered  and  redistributed  during  the  scarification  process.  Only  concentrations  may 
be  burned. 

In  addition  to  the  mitigation  measures  common  to  all  the  action  alternatives,  the  following  mitigation  applies: 

Slash  will  be  placed  from  right-of-way  windrow  back  on  road  prism  to  form  °jackpot"  type  piles  with 
a minimum  diameter  of  25  feet  and  an  average  height  of  4 to  6 feet  after  completion  of  timber  removal 
and  during  slash  disposal.  The  timber  sale  contract  will  contain  provisions  for  this  procedure. 

Piles  will  be  placed  at  1 00  to  200  foot  (avg.  of  1 50  foot)  intervals,  will  extend  from  cutslope  to  fill  slope, 
and  will  be  of  sufficient  magnitude  and  continuity  to  discourage  all  travel  on  the  road  prism  by  humans 
on  foot  and/or  horseback.  Openings  created  in  the  windrows  by  construction  of  these  piles  will  serve 
as  big  game  travelways  and  should  not  have  residual  slash  in  excess  of  1 8 inches  high. 

A map  showing  the  roads  (last  1/2  mile  of  Road  # 60286.1  and  on  all  of  roads  60286.2,  60286-C  and 
60288)  where  slash  piling  will  occur  is  contained  in  the  Project  File. 

For  water  quality  protection,  windrows  will  not  be  disturbed  where  the  distance  from  the  toe  of  the 
fill  slope  to  live  water  is  less  than  200  feet. 


Summary  - 20 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Summary 


ALTERNATIVE  2A 


This  alternative  was  developed  to  respond  to  concerns  about  visual  quality.  It  is  designed  to  mitigate  the  visual 
effects  of  timber  harvest  when  viewed  from  a landscape  or  background  view.  All  harvest  units  meet  Forest  Plan 
standards  and  guidelines  for  visual  quality  in  terms  of  size.  The  unit  sizes  and  locations  are  basically  the  same 
as  Alternative  2 (Figure  II-2A).  However,  where  slopes  permit,  from  10%  to  30%  of  the  area  within  the  clearcuts 
would  be  left  in  uncut  islands  ranging  from  approximately  1 12  to  1 acre  in  size.  In  addition,  releasable  residual 
understory  trees  that  are  free  from  disease  will  be  left  in  all  clearcuts.  In  the  Douglas-fir  community,  timber 
stands  would  be  harvested  using  an  irregular  shelterwood  method.  One  key  feature  of  this  method  is  the  delay 
of  the  removal  cut  until  the  average  height  of  the  regeneration  is  approximately  20  feet. 

The  island  concept  would  be  utilized  in  24  of  the  26  proposed  clearcuts  (units  27A  and  28A  are  small  cable 
where  no  islands  would  be  left).  As  an  example  unit  19A  (18  acres)  would  have  5 islands  designated 
(approximately  1 acre  in  size)  thus  the  treated  area  would  be  reduced  to  1 4 acres,  a reduction  of  approxi- 
mately 30%.  Unit  26  (9  acres)  would  have  2 islands  designated  (approximately  1/2  acre  in  size)  thus  the 
treated  area  would  be  reduced  to  approximately  8 acres,  a reduction  of  approximately  10%.  In  units  with 
heavy  fuel  loadings  and  steep  slopes,  some  islands  would  be  destroyed  during  the  slash  piling  or  burning 
processes.  The  degree  to  which  the  residual  understory  will  be  maintained  will  depend  upon  slope,  fuel 
loading,  and  the  condition  of  the  understory. 

The  main  purpose  of  the  leaving  the  islands  is  to  break  up  the  units  in  order  to  provide  a more  visually  pleasing 
setting  when  seen  from  a background  or  landscape  view.  However  the  islands  do  provide  other  benefits 
which  include: 

1.  Provide  a regenerated  stand  that  more  closely  approximates  the  species  mix  currently  occupying 
the  site; 

2.  Provide  big  game  bedding  sites  within  the  newly  created  forage  area; 

3.  Break  up  site  distances  within  the  units  to  increase  security  and  thus  use  by  big  game;  and 

4.  Ensure  protection  of  snags  and  retention  trees  that  may  otherwise  be  pushed  over  or  damaged 
during  the  skidding  and  piling  process. 


Total  area  within  harvest  units  (acres)  560 

Total  area  that  would  be  treated  (acres)  502 

Total  volume  that  would  be  harvested  (mmbf)  4,20 


Miles  of  road 
Constructed: 
Reconstructed: 


16.8 

1.3 


Number  of  cutting  units 
Douglas-fir 

Lodgepole  pine  or  mixed  lodgepole  pine, 
subalpine  fir  and  Engelmann  spruce 


7 

25 


Summary  - 21 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Summary 


Clearcut  Cutting  Methods: 

Amount  clearcut  (acres)  344 

Logging  Methods: 

tractor  (acres)  334 

cable  (acres)  10 

Slash  Disposal  Method: 

piled  and  burned  (acres)  244 

broadcast  burned  (acres)  1 00 

Machine  Scarification  (acres)  50-1 00 

Shelterwood  Cutting  Method: 

Amount  Shelterwood  (acres)  1 58 

Logging  Methods: 

tractor  (acres)  144 

cable  (acres)  1 4 

Slash  Disposal  Method: 

piled  and  burned  * 

broadcast  burned  0 

Machine  Scarification  (acres)  1 44 


* - slash  will  lopped,  scattered,  and  redistributed  during  the  scarification  process.  Only  concentrations  may 
be  burned. 

In  addition  to  the  mitigation  measures  common  to  all  the  action  alternatives,  the  following  mitigation  applies: 

Slash  will  be  placed  from  right-of-way  windrow  back  on  road  prism  to  form  "jackpot"  type  piles  with 
a minimum  diameter  of  25  feet  and  an  average  height  of  4 to  6 feet  after  completion  of  timber  removal 
and  during  slash  disposal.  The  timber  sale  contract  will  contain  provisions  for  this  procedure. 

Piles  will  be  placed  at  1 00  to  200  foot  (avg.  of  1 50  foot)  intervals,  will  extend  from  cutslope  to  fill  slope, 
and  will  be  of  sufficient  magnitude  and  continuity  to  discourage  all  travel  on  the  road  prism  by  humans 
on  foot  and/or  horseback.  Openings  created  in  the  windrows  by  construction  of  these  piles  will  serve 
as  big  game  travelways  and  should  not  have  residual  slash  in  excess  of  1 8 inches  high. 

A map  showing  the  roads  (last  1/2  mile  of  Road  # 60286.1  and  on  all  of  roads  60286.2,  60286-C  and 
60288)  where  slash  piling  will  occur  is  contained  in  the  Project  File. 

For  water  quality  protection,  windrows  will  not  be  disturbed  where  the  distance  from  the  toe  of  the 
fill  slope  to  live  water  is  less  than  200  feet. 


Summary  - 22 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Summary 


MANAGEMENT  AND  MITIGATION 

Site-specific  management  and  mitigation  measures  were  developed  by  the  ID  Team  for  each  of  the  resources 
in  the  Moyer  Salt  and  Salt  Creek  Timber  Sale  analysis  area  are  listed  in  Table  11-1  in  the  Final  EIS.  These 
measures  were  developed  by  applying  various  State  and  Federal  standards  and  guidelines  and  Best 
Management  Practices  that  govern  how  timber  harvesting  and  road  construction  are  implemented  to  the 
site-specific  conditions  that  occur  in  the  analysis  area.  The  sources  for  the  various  management  and 
mitigation  measures  include  the  Forest  Plan;  various  Forest  Service  Manuals  that  give  direction  for  protection 
of  soils,  water,  fisheries  and  other  resources;  state  management  guidelines;  and  various  other  sources. 


MONITORING 

The  Salmon  National  Forest  has  developed  a plan  to  monitor  and  evaluate  implementation  of  the  Forest  Plan, 
monitor  the  effectiveness  of  management  practices  implemented  under  the  Forest  Plan,  and  validate  the 
assumptions  and  models  used  in  planning  (Forest  Plan,  V-2-19).  This  would  allow  the  evaluation  of  progress 
toward  achieving  the  goals,  objectives,  and  standards  of  the  Forest  Plan. 

A site-specific  monitoring  program  of  activities  on  the  Forest  is  performed  annually;  not  all  activities  on  the 
Forest  are  monitored  on  an  annual  basis,  and  not  all  of  the  Forest  Plan  monitoring  requirements  are 
performed  for  each  project.  Results  of  the  monitoring  program  are  presented  in  an  annual  Forest  Plan 
Monitoring  and  Evaluation  Report. 

Project-specific  monitoring  for  some  resources  would  be  conducted  on  the  proposed  timber  sale  during 
timber  harvest  and  road  construction  to  ensure  that  implementation  is  consistent  with  the  established 
standards  and  guidelines,  specifically  those  outlined  in  the  timber  sale  contract.  Monitoring  is  also  conducted 
during  and  after  sale  implementation  to  determine  the  effectiveness  of  management  activities  and  applied 
mitigation  measures  developed  specifically  for  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale.  These  monitoring  measures  are 
described  in  Chapter  II  of  the  Final  EIS. 


AFFECTED  ENVIRONMENT 

The  existing  condition  of  the  environment  that  would  be  affected  by  the  action  alternatives  was  analyzed  to 
provide  a baseline  for  comparison  of  the  effects  on  the  environment  as  a result  of  project  activities.  The 
existing  environment  of  the  area  affected  by  the  proposed  action  is  described  in  detail  in  the  Final  EIS  in  terms 
of  specific  resources,  including:  soils,  hydrology,  fisheries,  vegetation,  wildlife,  Threatened,  Endangered  and 
Sensitive  Species,  roadless  area,  visuals,  recreation,  range,  transportation,  minerals,  cultural  resources,  air 
quality,  and  economic  efficiency. 

The  analysis  area  for  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  is  located  in  the  Salmon  National  Forest  on  the  Cobalt 
Ranger  District.  It  is  located  about  22  miles  southwest  of  Salmon,  Idaho,  in  the  Salmon  River  Mountains,  in 
the  east-central  portion  of  Idaho  (Figure  1-1).  The  area  of  analysis  lies  between  the  Woodtick  Creek  drainage 
on  the  north,  the  Moyer  Creek  drainage  on  the  west,  Moyer  Peak  on  the  south,  and  the  Salmon  River  Mountain 
Road  (F.  S.  Road  020)  on  the  east  (Figure  1-2). 

Soil  Resources:  Soils  throughout  the  analysis  area  are  loamy  sands  and  sandy  loams  developed  from  the 
Yellowjacket  quartzite.  Clay  content  varies  but  is  generally  low.  Coarse  fragments  (gravel,  cobbles,  and 
stones)  make  up  as  much  as  35  percent  by  volume  of  the  soils  throughout  the  entire  analysis  area.  Soils 
throughout  the  area  are  generally  quite  stable,  although  some  areas  of  slight  rilling  were  noted  in  areas  with 


Summary  - 23 


Moyer  Salt  Umber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Summary 


higher  sand  and  fine  gravel  content.  The  bedrock  character  of  the  project  area,  composed  of  laminated  siltite, 
argillite,  and  cross-bedded  quartzite,  dictates  a low  natural  sediment  rate  for  the  area  and  good  mass  stability. 

Hydrology:  The  analysis  area  is  drained  primarily  by  the  Woodtick  Creek  and  Moyer  Creek  drainages,  both 
of  which  are  tributaries  of  Panther  Creek.  Woodtick  Creek,  Moyer  Creek,  and  a small  portion  of  Panther  Creek 
occur  on  the  perimeter  of  the  analysis  area;  smaller  streams  that  occur  within  the  analysis  area  are  tributaries 
to  these  creeks.  Salt  Creek  and  "Perm'  Creek  are  small  perennial  streams  that  are  tributaries  of  Moyer  Creek. 
Goodluck  Creek  and  an  unnamed  creek  to  the  west  of  Goodluck  Creek  are  tributaries  to  Woodtick  Creek. 

Based  upon  past  watershed  inventories  the  stream  channel  stability  in  Moyer  Creek  and  Woodtick  Creek 
drainages  is  generally  fair  to  good.  Water  quality  data  collected  on  Moyer  Creek  and  Woodtick  Creek  in  1 992 
showed  that  existing  beneficial  water  uses  are  currently  being  protected.  Panther  Creek  and  its  tributaries 
above  Blackbird  Creek,  including  the  streams  in  the  analysis  area,  have  been  designated  by  the  State  of  Idaho 
as  having  the  following  Designated  Water  Uses:  Domestic  Water  Supply,  Agricultural  Water  Supply,  Cold 
Water  Biota,  Salmonid  Spawning,  Primary  Contact  Recreation,  and  Secondary  Contact  Recreation.  Currently 
none  of  the  streams  within  the  analysis  area  are  used  as  a source  of  domestic  water.  The  primary  existing 
beneficial  water  uses  are  for  cold  water  biota,  salmonid  spawning,  and  secondary  contact  recreation. 

Little  Woodtick  Creek,  a small,  intermittent  stream  that  is  a tributary  of  Woodtick  Creek,  is  located  north  of  and 
adjacent  to  the  analysis  area  for  the  proposed  timber  sale.  The  1 988  Tick  Creek  Timber  Sale  in  the  vicinity 
of  Little  Woodtick  Creek  harvested  about  23  percent  of  that  drainage.  As  a result  of  harvesting  a significant 
portion  of  the  drainage,  stream  sedimentation  has  occurred  in  Little  Woodtick  Creek  in  the  low-gradient 
depositional  areas  of  the  channel.  However,  Woodtick  Creek,  because  of  its  greater  flow,  is  able  to  transport 
the  sediment  delivered  by  Little  Woodtick.  No  significant  stream  sedimentation  is  anticipated  in  Woodtick 
Creek  as  a result  of  the  channel  erosion  in  Little  Woodtick  Creek. 

Several  types  of  wetlands  are  found  in  the  analysis  area.  Riparian  stringer  wetlands  occur  adjacent  to 
streams,  primarily  Woodtick  Creek,  and  are  the  most  common.  Isolated  wetlands  derived  from  springs  and 
seeps  and  wet  meadows  with  willows,  alder,  or  other  characteristic  wetland  vegetative  communities  are  found 
scattered  throughout  the  area. 

Fisheries:  The  Woodtick  Creek  and  Moyer  Creek  watersheds  contain  streams  that  are  perennial  and  possess 
sufficient  flow  volume  and  aquatic  habitat  capability  to  support  substantial  fisheries  resources.  The  mainstem 
reaches  of  Woodtick  Creek  and  Moyer  Creek  both  support  well-established  populations  of  resident  salmonids 
such  as  bull  trout  (Dolly  Varden),  and  rainbow  trout;  mountain  whitefish  also  occur  in  Moyer  Creek.  The 
Woodtick  Creek  and  Moyer  Creek  drainages  are  components  of  the  Panther  Creek  drainage  system,  which 
was  historically  a major  producer  of  several  species  of  anadromous  fish,  including  spring/summer  Chinook 
salmon  and  summer  steelhead.  The  Moyer  Creek  drainage  has  been  identified  as  the  most  important  Chinook 
salmon  spawning  tributary  of  the  Panther  Creek  drainage  system.  However,  Panther  Creek  and  its  tributaries 
have  not  been  used  by  these  species  since  the  1 960s  because  of  chemical  pollution  of  mid  and  lower  Panther 
Creek  by  the  Blackbird  Mine.  With  correction  of  the  pollution  problem  and  reintroduction,  Moyer  Creek  could 
be  a viable  producer  of  anadromous  fish. 

Fish  habitat  capabilities  in  Woodtick  and  Moyer  Creeks  are  moderate  to  high.  These  streams  exhibit  a diverse 
variety  of  microhabitats.  Abundant  adult  rearing  habitat  is  provided  by  lateral  scour  pools  and  dammed  pools, 
and  numerous  shallow  edgewater  areas  and  backwater  pools  contribute  to  provide  dispersed  rearing  habitat 
for  juvenile  life  stages.  Stream  substrates  in  this  area  are  dominated  by  angular  quartzite  rubble  with  clean 
gravels  that  are  relatively  free  of  fine-grained  sediment.  However,  an  existing  60-inch  culvert  where  F.S.  Road 
#107  crosses  Woodtick  Creek  in  the  lower  portion  of  the  analysis  area  (Township  20  N,  Range  19  E,  Section 
32)  currently  poses  a barrier  to  upstream  anadromous  and  resident  fish  passage  on  that  stream. 


Summary  - 24 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Summary 


Within  the  analysis  area,  streams  that  are  tributaries  to  Woodtick  and  Moyer  Creeks  are  generally  .small 
perennial  streams  whose  fisheries  habitat  are  largely  limited  to  their  lower  reaches.  These  streams  contain 
low  gradient  gravel-bottomed  riffles  and  small  pools  that  provide  supplemental  spawning  and  nursery  habitat 
to  mainstem  Moyer  Creek  and  Woodtick  Creek  fish  populations.  Although  these  streams  provide  relatively 
minor  amounts  of  supplemental  habitat  to  the  Moyer  Creek  and  Woodtick  Creek  systems,  they  serve 
important  contributory  functions  to  the  maintenance  of  water  quality  within  the  larger  streams. 

Biological  Diversity:  Diversity  in  the  Moyer  Salt  timber  sale  area  was  analyzed  from  three  perspectives: 
regional,  forest-wide  and  in  the  defined  landscape. 

Regionally  (north  central  part  of  the  intermountain  west),  many  animals  and  plants  communities  found  on  the 
Salmon  National  Forest  are  similar  to  those  in  the  rest  of  the  region.  Differences  appear  in  the  proportions 
of  various  plant  communities  (e.g.  more  logdepole  pine  than  Douglas-fir  in  one  area)  due  to  varying  aspects, 
elevations  and  latitudes. 

Forest-wide,  the  conifer  plant  communities  dominate  (77%  of  non-wilderness  areas)  and  a range  of  structural 
sized  trees  (e.g.  seedlings,  saplings,  poles,  immature  and  mature)  are  present.  There  are  36  regionally  or 
nationally  'listed"  [Threatened,  Endangered,  Proposed  and  Sensitive  (TEPS)]  rare  animal  and  plant  species 
which  occur  or  are  suspected  to  occur  on  the  Forest. 

In  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  (see  Figure  111-2)  non-forested  grass/shrub  communities  occur  at  lower  eleva- 
tions and  conifers  (lodgepole  pine,  Douglas-fir,  subalpine  fir)  at  the  higher.  Each  community  has  it’s  own 
associated  wildlife  and  plant  species  which  are  common  to  landscapes  elsewhere  in  the  region.  There  are 
1 2 TEPS  species  known  or  suspected  to  occur  in  this  landscape.  Of  those  listed,  only  goshawk,  lynx  and 
bull/cutthroat  trout  have  been  observed.  Wolves  and  Chinook  salmon  were  once  residents.  Their  absence 
however,  is  unrelated  to  past  or  proposed  timber  management  in  the  area. 

Vegetation:  The  vegetation  and  therefore  the  wildlife  habitat  in  the  analysis  area  varies  with  elevation  and 
aspect.  The  upper  elevations  are  heavily  forested  and  contain  very  few  openings.  Most  of  this  forested  area 
is  comprised  of  a 'mixed  conifer0  forest  community  that  occurs  on  the  subalpine  fir  habitat  series.  These 
forests  contain  a canopy  of  mature  to  overmature  lodgepole  pine  with  varying  percentages  of  subalpine  fir, 
Englemann  spruce  and  Douglas-fir  in  the  canopy  and  subcanopy.  The  lodgepole  pine  trees  are  dying  of  old 
age  and  insect  and  disease  infestations,  and  are  being  replaced  by  subalpine  fir  trees.  New  trees  are  growing 
in  the  openings  created  when  the  older  trees  die.  There  is  an  abundance  of  dead  trees  and  logs  laying  on 
the  ground;  this  condition  creates  a very  high  risk  of  an  intense  wildfire  occurring  in  the  area.  These  stands 
have  a high  level  of  species,  structural,  and  age  diversity  at  the  stand  level.  However,  because  this  forest 
community  occurs  as  one  large  homogeneous  block  with  very  few  openings  or  variations  in  forest  types,  the 
diversity  on  the  scale  of  the  analysis  area  is  low. 

Another  component  of  the  lodgepole  pine  community  is  a stand  condition  that  is  characterized  by  an 
abundance  of  closely  spaced  pole-sized  trees  that  have  stopped  growing  or  are  dying  due  to  competition 
between  individual  trees  and  infestation  by  insects  and  dwarf  mistletoe,  a parasitic  plant.  As  these  trees  die 
they  are  being  replaced  by  subalpine  fir  trees.  Because  these  stands  are  comprised  of  trees  that  are  all  the 
same  age  and  size,  they  have  very  low  diversity  on  both  the  stand  level  and  the  analysis  area  level. 

A Douglas-fir  forest  community  that  occupies  several  Douglas-fir  habitat  types  is  present  at  lower  elevations 
than  the  lodgepole  pine  forests.  At  the  highest  elevations  the  Douglas-fir  forests  are  characterized  by  heavily 
forested  slopes  that  occur  on  all  aspects.  At  lower  elevations  the  forested  areas  are  confined  to  the  north- 
facing slopes,  creating  forested  stringers  separated  by  sagebrush  openings.  These  stands  occur  on  a variety 
of  habitat  types  and  thus  contain  a diversity  of  plant  species.  These  ecotones  are  important  wildlife  habitat 
components,  particularly  for  species  that  require  forest/nonforest  environments. 


Summary  - 25 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Saie  Final  EIS 


Summary 


The  Douglas-fir  community  can  be  broken  down  into  two  stand  conditions:  one  is  composed  entirely  of  stands 
of  older  Douglas-fir  trees  with  very  few  young  trees;  these  stands  have  very  low  species,  structural  or  age 
diversity  on  the  stand  scale.  The  remainder  of  the  Douglas-fir  community  is  a mix  of  overmature  Douglas-fir 
and  lodgepole  pine  canopy  with  minor  Englemann  spruce  and  subalpine  fir  with  a variable  understory  of 
lodgepole  pine  and  Douglas-fir.  These  stands  contain  varying  amounts  of  new  young  trees.  Structural, 
species,  and  age  diversity  of  these  stands  is  high  on  the  stand  level. 

The  distribution  of  forest  communities  in  the  analysis  area  is  a function  in  part  of  the  fire  history  of  the  area. 
Many  of  the  lodgepole  pine  stands  were  established  following  large  forest  fires  in  the  80-1 20  years  ago; 
therefore,  many  of  the  trees  in  the  area  are  the  same  age.  Since  the  arrival  of  European  man  in  eastern  Idaho 
the  natural  fire  regime  has  been  interrupted,  and  forest  that  normally  would  have  burned  and  generated  new 
stands  of  young  trees  have  not  done  so.  Therefore,  the  age  diversity  and  the  diversity  of  condition  classes 
within  the  analysis  area  is  low;  most  of  the  stands  in  the  area  are  in  the  mature  to  overmature  condition  classes 
(lodgepole  pine  trees  are  80  to  160  years  old,  and  Douglas-fir  trees  are  120  to  210  years  in  age),  and  95 
percent  of  the  stands  occur  within  two  age  classes.  The  lack  of  age  diversity  and  the  advanced  age  of  these 
stands  increase  the  susceptibility  of  these  stands  to  catastrophic  events  such  as  attack  by  insects  or  disease. 

Timber  Resources:  The  timber  resources  in  the  area  have  been  affected  by  past  timber  harvest  activities, 
fire  and  fire  suppression,  and  climatic  events  such  as  drought  that  affect  the  condition  of  the  stands  at 
present.  A variety  of  forest  insects  and  diseases  are  known  to  exist  in  the  analysis  area,  including  western 
spruce  budworm,  lodgepole  pine  dwarf  mistletoe,  mountain  pine  beetle,  Douglas-fir  beetle,  and  western 
balsam  bark  beetle.  Some  of  these  insects  and  diseases  are  causing  defoliation,  reduced  growth,  or  mortality 
in  the  tree  stands,  whereas  others  are  present  at  levels  that  are  not  significantly  affecting  the  growth  and  vigor 
of  the  forest. 

Previous  timber  harvest  activity  that  has  occurred  within  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  analysis  area  includes 
500  acres  of  harvest  in  the  Douglas-fir  community  in  the  1 973-74  Salt  Creek  Timber  Sale  in  the  northwestern 
portion  of  the  analysis  area,  and  128  acres  of  the  lodgepole  pine  community  was  clearcut  in  the  1989  Tick 
Creek  Timber  Sale. 

During  the  planning  process  for  the  Forest  Plan  the  suitability  of  all  lands  on  the  Forest  for  timber  harvest  was 
determined.  Within  the  1 5,360-acre  analysis  area,  1 1 ,292  acres  are  in  the  suitable  timber  base.  The  site 
potential  of  these  lands  (or  estimated  yield  capabilities,  in  cubic  feet  of  wood  fiber  per  acre  per  year)  averages 
40-50  cubic  feet/acre/year,  but  most  stands  are  old  and  no  longer  growing  at  a productive  rate,  and  thus  are 
producing  much  less  than  this  amount.  The  age  class  distribution  of  timber  stands  in  the  analysis  area  shows 
that  currently  less  than  5%  of  the  forested  areas  in  the  analysis  area  are  in  age  class  1 or  2.  The  remaining 
95%  of  the  stands  in  the  analysis  area  are  in  age  classes  4 and  5 (for  Douglas-fir)  and  in  3 and  4 (for  lodgepole 
pine).  Lodgepole  pine  stands  may  be  as  old  as  120  years  while  Douglas-fir  stands  may  exceed  200  years 
old. 

Wildlife  Resources:  The  'management  indicator  species'  (MIS)  approach  was  used  in  the  Salmon  National 
Forest  Plan’s  process  to  help  assess  and  predict  the  influence  of  forest  management  practices  on  habitat, 
species  diversity  and  individual  species  well-being.  MIS  species  include  big  game  species,  threatened  and 
endangered  species,  and  other  species  for  which  population  levels  and  habitat  objectives  can  be  established 
and  which  represent  a number  of  other  wildlife  species.  MIS  species  from  the  Forest  Plan’s  list  that  occur  in 
the  analysis  area  include:  elk,  mule  deer,  mountain  goat,  bighorn  sheep,  pine  marten,  pileated  woodpecker, 
vesper  sparrow,  yellow  warbler,  ruby-crowned  kinglet,  goshawk,  yellow-bellied  sapsucker  (now  called  red- 
naped  sapsucker),  brown  creeper  and  mountain  bluebird. 

Elk,  mule  deer  and  mountain  goats  are  the  big  game  species  that  occur  in  the  analysis  ares;  elk  and  mule 
deer  are  most  abundant  and  occur  throughout  the  entire  area.  The  forested/nonforested  ecotones  and  aspen 


Summary  - 26 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Summary 


clones,  particularly  on  the  Moyer  Creek  face  and  in  Salt  Creek,  are  used  as  calving,  fawning  and  nursery  areas 
by  elk  and  mule  deer.  Approximately  half  of  the  analysis  area  has  been  mapped  as  key  elk  summer  range 
(KESR),  but  the  entire  area  receives  heavy  spring,  summer  and  fall  elk  and  mule  deer  use.  Habitat  for  big 
game  varies  throughout  the  analysis  area  depending  on  the  vegetation  types  present. 

The  forested  lands  below  approximately  7500  feet  elevation  (Area  1)  consist  primarily  of  Douglas-fir  timber 
stands  and  minor  mixed  conifer  (Douglas-fir,  subalpine  fir,  Englemann  spruce,  and  lodgepole  pine)  timber 
stands.  Natural  timber/nontimber  ecotones,  openings  dominated  by  sagebrush  and  bunch  grasses,  and 
small  aspen  stands  or  clones  occur  throughout  this  area  in  conjunction  with  blocks,  stringers  and  islands  of 
timber  and  give  the  area  very  high  habitat  potentials  for  mule  deer  and  elk.  Most  of  the  timber  stands, 
particularly  the  Douglas-fir  stands,  are  in  an  old  growth  condition  (most  trees  are  more  than  200  years  old, 
a mix  of  age  classes  is  present,  and  the  stand  is  in  a natural  mature  to  overmature  state).  Habitat  for 
old-growth  dependent  species  such  as  goshawk  and  pine  marten  is  available  in  pristine  condition. 

Area  II,  the  upper  elevations  generally  surrounding  Moyer  Peak,  is  dominated  by  fairly  uniform  stands  of  mixed 
conifers,  including  lodgepole  pine  and  subalpine  fir  with  some  Englemann  spruce  in  the  more  mesic  sites. 
This  area  is  almost  entirely  within  the  subalpine  fir/grouse  whortleberry  habitat  type.  Very  few  natural 
openings  exist  and  habitat  diversity  is  low.  Timber  stands  in  old-growth  condition  are  abundant.  This  area 
offers  extremely  good  big  game  hiding  and/or  security  cover. 

Other  wildlife  species  that  occur  in  the  analysis  area  are  typical  for  this  portion  of  Idaho  and  include  black 
bear,  cougar,  bobcats,  coyotes,  pine  marten  and  beaver.  Game  birds  such  as  blue,  ruffed  and  Franklin’s 
(spruce)  grouse  occur  throughout  the  area.  Cavity  nesting  and/or  old  growth  dependent  MIS,  including 
goshawks,  pine  marten,  great  gray  owls,  pileated  woodpeckers  and  brown  creeper,  are  found  throughout  the 
analysis  area.  Populations  of  these  species  are  high  due  primarily  to  the  relatively  pristine  old-growth  habitat 
component. 

Threatened,  Endangered  and  Sensitive  Species:  Columbia  River  spring/summer  Chinook  salmon  have 
recently  been  listed  as  'Threatened’  status  by  the  National  Marine  Fisheries  Service  (Federal  Register,  April 
22, 1992).  This  species  has  historically  utilized  mainstem  Moyer  Creek  spawning  and  rearing  habitats  (Reiser, 
1986),  but  are  currently  unable  to  access  these  habitats  due  to  mainstem  Panther  Creek  water  quality 
problems  due  to  acid  mine  drainage. 

Potential  habitat  for  the  Endangered  gray  wolf  exists  in  the  area,  although  no  wolves  are  known  or  suspected 
to  occupy  the  area  at  this  time.  The  entire  area  is  included  within  the  Central  Idaho  Wolf  Recovery  Area  and 
may  become  important  to  this  species  at  some  point  in  the  recovery  process. 

Ten  species  from  the  Forest  Service  Intermountain  Region  Vertebrate  Sensitive  Species  List  were  assessed 
to  determine  whether  they  are  present  or  their  habitat  is  present  in  the  analysis  area.  Although  habitat  for  each 
of  these  species  (North  American  lynx,  wolverine,  western  or  Townsend’s  big-eared  bat,  boreal  owl,  northern 
three-toed  woodpecker,  great  grey  owl,  spotted  frog,  northern  goshawk,  bull  trout  and  steelhead)  occurs  in 
the  analysis  area,  only  the  Northern  goshawk  has  actually  been  observed  in  the  area.  Habitat  for  the  Northern 
goshawk  is  present  throughout  the  area  in  dense,  old-growth  conifer,  mixed  conifer/aspen,  and  aspen 
stands.  One  nest  site  is  known  to  occur  in  the  area,  and  others  may  be  present  but  have  not  been  sighted. 
Bull  trout  (Dolly  Varden)  are  known  to  be  present  in  the  mainstem  reaches  of  both  Woodtick  Creek  and  Moyer. 
Habitat  for  steelhead  trout  exists  in  Moyer  Creek  and  Woodtick  Creek  but  is  not  currently  utilized  because 
of  downstream  water  pollution  of  Panther  Creek  due  to  acid  mine  drainage. 

Roadless  Area  Resource:  The  63,220-acre  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area  is  the  only  inventoried  roadless 
area  that  would  be  affected  by  the  alternatives  for  this  proposed  action.  Approximately  40  percent  of  the  acres 
within  the  roadless  area  boundary  are  in  management  areas  that  include  timber  management  objectives.  The 


Summary  - 27 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  ESS 


Summary 


remaining  60  percent  of  the  area  has  management  prescriptions  for  semi-primitive  motorized  recreation 
opportunities.  Only  the  northern  portion  of  the  roadless  area  would  be  affected  by  the  proposed  action. 

The  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area  appears  undeveloped  to  most  visitors.  Effects  of  human  activities  are 
limited  to  the  fringes  of  the  Roadless  Area  where  Forest  roads,  jeep  trails  and  foot  trails  are  located.  There 
are  many  opportunities  for  primitive  recreation  within  the  boundaries  of  the  roadless  area,  including  hunting, 
hiking  and  horseback  riding.  Approximately  80  percent  of  current  primitive  recreation  consists  of  elk  hunting. 
Motorized  recreation  is  allowed  under  current  management  direction,  and  most  is  centered  along  the  Moyer 
jeep  trail. 

The  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area  is  not  considered  outstanding  for  solitude  opportunities  because  of  its 
relatively  small  size  and  noticeable  human  activities  along  the  perimeter.  The  difficulty  of  travel  in  the  area 
does  promote  a sense  of  remoteness.  The  apparent  natural  naturalness  and  natural  integrity  of  the  area  is 
compromised  by  evidence  of  human  disturbance  and  the  sounds  of  heavy  equipment  and  vehicles  in  areas 
north  of  the  analysis  area. 

Visual  Resources:  Views  into  the  area  from  designated  sensitive  travel  routes  (Panther  Creek  Road  (F.S. 
Road  055)  (Sensitivity  level  1),  Moyer  Creek  Road  (F.S.  Road  103)  (Sensitivity  level  2),  and  the  Salmon  River 
Mountain  Road  ("Ridge  Road")  (F.S.  Road  020)  (Sensitivity  level  2))  are  limited  and  are  generally  of  the 
rounded,  forested  ridge  tops.  Visual  Quality  Objectives  of  the  area  are  Partial  Retention  and  Modification. 

Recreation  Resources:  Current  recreation  use  is  considered  light  and  is  primarily  related  to  big  game 
hunting  in  the  fall.  There  are  no  system  trails  in  the  area.  The  Moyer  Jeep  Trail,  located  along  the  south  edge 
of  the  proposal  area,  is  probably  the  heaviest  used  portion  of  the  area.  Current  Recreation  Opportunity 
Classes  include  Roaded-Natural  Appearing,  Semi-primitive  Motorized  and  Semi-primitive  Nonmotorized. 

Air  Quality:  All  Salmon  National  Forest  lands,  including  wilderness  areas  and  the  proposed  timber  sale  area, 
are  in  a Class  II  airshed  as  designated  by  the  1 977  Clean  Air  Act.  The  Class  II  designation  allows  moderate 
increases  in  new  air  pollution.  Air  quality  in  the  analysis  area  is  generally  excellent  and  meets  guidelines 
established  by  Idaho  air  quality  laws  and  the  National  Clean  Air  Act.  Air  quality  may  be  degraded  as  a result 
of  prescribed  burning  in  the  spring  and  fall  by  the  Salmon  National  Forest  and  surrounding  forests,  fire 
management  fires  burning  in  areas  north  of  the  Salmon  National  Forest,  dust  from  roads,  logging  operations, 
and  mining  operations,  and  wildfires. 

Range  Resources:  Two  range  allotments,  the  Williams-Napias  Creek  C&H  allotment,  on  the  north  end  of  the 
analysis  area,  and  the  Forney  C&H  allotment  to  the  south,  occur  in  the  analysis  area.  Both  are  cattle 
allotments  and  are  good  condition. 

Transportation  and  Access:  Existing  roads  located  on  the  perimeter  of  the  analysis  area  are  mostly  used 
for  recreation  and  consist  of  12  miles  of  maintained  road  and  5 miles  of  primitive  jeep  trail  (F.S.  Trail  6204, 
the  Moyer  Peak  jeep  trail).  These  roads  are  open  year-round  and  all  except  the  primitive  jeep  trail  are 
maintained  for  recreation  traffic.  Existing  timber  access  roads  within  the  analysis  area  include  1 2 miles  of 
timber  access  road  and  approximately  2 miles  of  old  logging  roads  that  are  gated  and  closed  to  the  public 
for  big  game  security  and  erosion  control. 

Mineral  Resources:  The  potential  for  minerals  development  in  the  analysis  area  for  leasable  minerals  (oil, 
gas  and  coal)  and  locatable  or  hard  rock  minerals  was  assessed.  Although  there  are  presently  active  mining 
claims  in  the  analysis  area,  no  known  mineral  occurrences  exist  and  no  mineral  production  has  occurred.  The 
potential  for  a locatable  mineral  discovery  exists  but  no  deposits  occur  in  the  area.  The  geology  of  the  area 

also  suggests  a low  potential  for  oil,  gas  or  coal  development. 


Summary  - 28 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Summary 


Cultural  Resources:  The  Moyer  Salt  timber  sale  analysis  area  was  partially  inventoried  for  cultural  resources, 
and  no  cultural  resources  were  found.  A cultural  resources  survey  will  be  performed  for  unsurveyed  areas 
before  project  implementation.  The  analysis  area  appears  to  have  a relatively  low  probability  for  significant 
cultural  resource  properties. 

Economic  Efficiency:  The  issues  of  ’below-cost"  timber  sales  and  of  the  economic  stability  of  communities 
in  the  Forest’s  primary  zone  of  influence  were  raised  by  the  public  during  development  of  the  Salmon  Forest 
Plan  (see  the  Record  of  Decision  for  the  Forest  Plan).  The  issue  of  below-cost  sales  is  based  on  the  General 
Accounting  Office  cash-flow  accounting  that  compares  single-year  dollar  receipts  with  costs  occurring  in  the 
same  year.  This  accounting  method  does  not  consider  long-term  investments  in  roads  and  other  facilities  or 
benefits  to  resources  that  cannot  have  a dollar  value  placed  on  them.  When  viewed  strictly  from  the  viewpoint 
of  the  GAO  accounting  method,  the  Forest  Service  sometimes  offers  timber  sales  that  don’t  return  the  cost 
of  selling  and  administering  them.  Not  only  could  other  forest  resources  benefit  as  a result  of  these  timber 
sales,  but  this  will  also  provide  an  opportunity  to  assist  in  maintaining  a viable  lumber  manufacturing  base 
and  economic  stability  to  the  local  dependent  community. 

Concern  has  been  raised  that  the  proposed  sale  is  not  economically  efficient  and  would  not  result  in  long-term 
positive  cash  flow.  The  economic  efficiency  of  the  proposed  alternatives  was  evaluated  using  the  present  net 
value  (PNV)  of  the  alternatives  calculated  from  the  MBF  sold,  post  sale  costs,  road  costs,  bridge  costs, 
cattleguard  costs,  and  other  costs  associated  with  the  sale. 


COMPARISON  OF  ALTERNATIVES 

Table  I contains  a summary  of  the  effects  of  the  alternatives  on  the  resources  in  the  analysis  area.  The 
measurement  indices  used  to  compare  these  effects  are  those  identified  in  the  discussion  of  the  issues. 


Summary  - 29 


Moyer  SaK  Timber  Sale  Final!  ESS 


Summary 


TABLE  S:  COMPARISON  OF  EFFECTS  OF  THE  ALTERNATSVES  BY  RESOURCE 


Measurement 

Indices 

ALT 

1 

ALT 

2 

ALT 

3 

ALT 

4 

ALT 

5 

ALT 

6 

PREFERRED 

ALT 

2A 

VEGETATION 

Vegetative  Diversity: 

Acres  Harvested 

0 

568 

440 

847 

292 

747 

502 

Age  distribution  following  harvest  (in  percent  of  analysis  area) 
(0-39  yrs)  4.9  9.3 

8.3 

11.5 

7.2 

10.7 

8.8 

(40-79  yrs) 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

(80-119  yrs 

11.7 

11.7 

11.7 

11.7 

11.7 

11.7 

11.7 

(120-159  yrs) 

69.9 

66.1 

67.1 

64.3 

68.3 

64.9 

66.6 

(165+  yrs) 

13.5 

12.9 

12.8 

12.7 

12.8 

12.7 

12.9 

Change  in  species 
diversity  in 
harvest  units 

None 

Moderate 

Increase 

Moderate 

Increase 

Moderate 

Increase 

Moderate 

Increase 

Moderate 

Increase 

Moderate 

Increase 

Timber  Resource: 

Volume  production 
in  mmbf 

0 

4.9 

3.75 

6.9 

1.79 

6.1 

4.2 

mmbf  deferred  * 

-6.1 

-1.2 

-2.25 

0.8 

-4.31 

0 ** 

-1.1 

Risk  of  infesta- 
tion by  insects 
and  diseases 

Moderate 
to  High 
Increase 

Strong 

Decrease 

Moderate 

Decrease 

Strong 

Decrease 

Low 

Decrease 

Strong 

Decrease 

Low 

Decrease 

Risk  of  infesta- 
tion by  noxious 
weeds 

Very  Low 

Low 

Low 

Moderate 

Very  Low 

Moderate 

Low 

* The  amounts  given  here  represent  the  difference  between  the  largest  Forest  Plan  consistent  mmbf  alternative  offered  (Alternative  6)  and  the  other 
alternatives.  These  volumes  display  the  mmbf  that  would  be  deferred  from  this  offer  during  this  planning  period. 

**  Alternative  6 represents  the  largest  mmbf  sale  quantity  off  that  meets  the  Forest  Plan  Standards  and  Guidelines  for  all  resources. 

Harvest  Method: 

Clearcuts  with 
Islands 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

427 

, 

402 

Clearcut  Acres 

0 

410 

270 

645 

124 

186 

10 

Shefterwood  Acres 

0 

158 

170 

202 

168 

202 

158 

Summary  - 30 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Summary 


TABLE  I,  continued:  COMPARISON  OF  EFFECTS  OF  THE  ALTERNATIVES  BY  RESOURCE 

Measurement  ALT  ALT  ALT  ALT  ALT  ALT  ALT 

Indices  1 2 3 4 5 6 2A 

PREFERRED 


WILDLIFE 
Elk  and  Deer: 


* Elk  Habitat  Potential  (EHP)  (Percent  of  potential) 
Areal  67%  51% 

Area  II  87%  90% 


51%  48%  59% 

88%  92%  88% 


51%  53% 

90%  89% 


Open  Road  Density: 

(Miles  road  per  square  mile) 

Area  I 0.14  0.14 

Area  II  0.56  0.56 


0.14 

0.56 


0.14  0.14 

0.56  0.56 


0.14 

0.56 


0.14 

0.56 


Total  Road  Density: 

| (Miles  road  per  square  mile) 


Area  1 

0.14 

1.46 

2.25 

1.0 

0.14 

1.0 

1.28 

Area  II 

0.56 

2.5 

1.5 

2.9 

0.72 

2.7 

2.42 

Cover  to  Forage  Ratio: 

Area  1 

32:68 

27:73 

27:73 

26:74 

29.71 

27.73 

28.72 

Area  II 

80:20 

72:28 

75:25 

68:32 

77.23 

69.31 

73.27 

**  Elk  Habitat  Security: 

Area  1 

High 

Low 

Moderate 

Very  Low 

Moderate 

Low 

Low 

Area  II 

Very  High 

High 

High 

High 

Very  High 

High 

High 

***  Elk  Vulnerability: 

Area  1 

Moderate 

Very  High 

High 

Very  High 

High 

Very  High 

Very  High 

Area  II 

Very  Low 

Moderate 

Low 

Moderate 

Low 

Moderate 

Moderate 

****  Old-growth  Dependent  Species: 

Acres  of  Timber  Stands  with  Old  Growth  Characteristics  Remaining: 

Area  1 

1750 

1500 

1520 

1430 

1625 

1475 

1540 

Area  II 

3550 

3200 

3250 

3025 

3310 

3040 

3250 

Percent  Loss  of  Timber  Stands  with  Old  Growth  Characteristics: 

Area  1 

0% 

15% 

13% 

18% 

7% 

16% 

12% 

Area  II 

0% 

10% 

8% 

15% 

5% 

14% 

8% 

Acres  of  Forest  Plan  Designated  Old-Growth  Retention  Stands  Cut: 

Area  1 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

Area  II 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

* Elk  Habitat  Potential  (EHP)  is  the  indicator  for  effects  to  elk  and  deer  and  is  derived  from  the  cover  to  forage  ratio  and  the  miles  of  road  per  square  mile. 


**  Elk  Habitat  Security  is  30%  of  an  area  occupied  by  cover  blocks  of  250  acres  located  1/2  mile  from  open  roads. 


***  Elk  Vulnerability  reflects  ease  of  human  access  and  susceptibility  of  hunted  elk. 

****  The  acres  and  percent  loss  of  timber  stands  with  old  growth  characteristics  and  old-growth  retention  stands  are  the  indicators  for  effects  to  goshawk, 
pine  marten  and  other  old-growth  dependent  species. 


Summary  - 31 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  E8S 


Summary 


TABLE  I,  continued:  COMPARISON  OF  EFFECTS  OF  THE  ALTERNATIVES  BY  RESOURCE 


Measurement 

ALT 

ALT 

ALT 

ALT 

ALT 

ALT 

ALT 

indices 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

PREFERRED 

2A 

ROADLESS  AREA: 

Acres  of  Roadless 
Area  Affected 

0 

9920 

9920 

9920 

208 

9920 

9920 

Percent  of 
Taylor  Mtn. 

Roadless  Area  Affected 

0 

16% 

16% 

16% 

<1% 

16% 

16% 

Acres  of  Roadless 
Area  Remaining 

63,220 

53,300 

53,300 

53,300 

63,012 

53,300 

53,300 

Wilderness 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Eligibility  Of  Roadless  Area  Maintained 

Effects  to  Roadless  Characteristics: 

Natural  Integrity 

None 

Decrease 

Decrease 

Decrease 

Decrease 

Decrease 

Decrease 

Apparent 

None 

Decrease 

Decrease 

Decrease 

Decrease 

Decrease 

Decrease 

Naturalness 

Primitive 

None 

None 

None 

None 

None 

None 

None 

Recreation 

Solitude 

None 

Decrease 

Decrease 

Decrease 

None 

Decrease 

Decrease 

Special  Features 

None 

None 

None 

None 

None 

None 

None 

Special  Places 
and  Activities 

None 

None 

None 

None 

None 

None 

None 

ECONOMIC  EFFICIENCY 

Present  Net  Value 
Long  Term  Average 

0 

-$210,077 

-$161,329 

-$300,679 

* 

-$277,853 

-$183,069 

Present  T rend 

0 

+$253,925 

+$303,502 

+$295,651 

-$94,938 

+$303,626 

+$262,241 

Gross  Stumpag®  Income 
Long  Term  Average 

0 

+$400,670 

+$306,186 

+$564,444 

+$69,315 

+$498,801 

4- $343,235 

Present  Trend 

0 

+$569,100 

+$525,300 

+754,200 

+$706,200 

+$527,100 

Road  Costs 
Construction 

0 

+$372,150 

+$383,850 

+$411,150 

+$42,000 

+$411,150 

+372,150 

Road  Costs/m  bf 

0 

+76 

+$102 

+$60 

+$26 

+$67 

+$89 

Th®  economic  efficiency  of  the  alternatives  can  be  compared  by  calculating  the  present  net  value  and  gross  income  of  each  alternative.  These  were  i j 
calculated  based  on  the  long  term  average  prices  and  with  present  prices  to  reflect  the  recent  increases  in  the  value  ot  timber.  | 

* No  value  was  calculated  because  this  alternative  was  not  economically  viable  (it  would  not  sell)  with  the  long  term  stumpage  values. 


Summary  - 32 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Summary 


TABLE  I,  continued:  COMPARISON  OF  EFFECTS  OF  THE  ALTERNATIVES  BY  RESOURCE 


Measurement 

ALT 

ALT 

ALT 

ALT 

ALT 

ALT 

ALT 

Indices 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

PREFERRED 

2A 

SOILS 


Existing  Roads 

16.6  mi. 

16.6  mi. 

16.6  mi. 

16.6  mi. 

16.6  mi. 

16.6  mi. 

16.6  mi. 

57  ac. 

57  ac. 

57  ac. 

57  ac. 

57  ac. 

57  ac. 

57  ac. 

New  Roads 

0 

16.8  mi. 

14.6  mi. 

17.8  mi. 

1.1  mi. 

17.8  mi. 

16.8  mi. 

0 

62.1  ac. 

55.2  ac. 

66.1  ac. 

4.0  ac. 

66.1  ac. 

62.1  ac. 

Acres  of  Total 
Soil  Resource 
Commitment 

57  ac. 

119  ac. 

Ill  ac. 

123  ac. 

61  ac. 

123  ac. 

119  ac. 

Percent  of  Analysis  Area 
with  Total  Soil 

0.4% 

0.8% 

0.7% 

0.8% 

0.4% 

0.8% 

0.8% 

Resource  Commitment  * 

* Total  soil  resource  commitment  occurs  when  the  soil  is  committed  to  a use  other  than  growing  vegetation  for  an  extended  period  of  time;  this  typically 
occurs  in  roads,  landing  areas,  and  some  skid  trails. 


HYDROLOGY 
Effects  to  Water  Yield; 


Percent  of  Drainages  Harvested*: 


Woodtick  Creek 

5.2% 

7.3% 

7.0% 

8.2% 

6.0% 

7.9% 

7.1% 

Salt  Creek 

0% 

9.1% 

4.5% 

14.3% 

5.1% 

12.3% 

8.2% 

'Perm'  Creek 

0% 

11.3% 

11.3% 

14.2% 

4.3% 

13.1% 

10.4% 

Predicted  Changes 
to  Water  Yield 

None 

No  Major 
Effect 

No  Major 
Effect 

No  Major 
Effect 

Minimal 

No  Major 
Effect 

No  Major 
Effect 

Beneficial  Water 
Uses  Maintained 

Yes 

Yes 

**  No 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

State  Water 
Quality  Standards  Met 

Yes 

Yes 

**  No 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

* Research  has  shown  that  harvesting  more  than  20  percent  of  a drainage  can  result  in  detectable  increases  in  peak  flow  due  to  loss  of  vegetation. 

**  Beneficial  water  uses  would  be  maintained  and  state  water  quality  standards  would  be  met  in  Woodtick  Creek  and  Moyer  Creek.  Adverse  water  quality 
impacts  are  anticipated  in  Salt  Creek  only. 


WETLANDS 

Acres  of  Wetlands  None  * <3  * <2  * <3  None  * <3  * <3 

Affected 

* These  acres  of  affected  wetlands  are  primarily  at  stream  crossings. 


Summary  - 33 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  ESS 


Summary 


TABLE  1,  continued:  COMPARISON  OF  EFFECTS  OF  THE  ALTERNATIVES  BY  RESOURCE 


Measurement 

Indices 


ALT  ALT  ALT  ALT 

12  3 4 


ALT 

5 


ALT  ALT 

® 2A 

PREFERRED 


FISHERIES 

Anadromous  and  * Yes  Yes  **  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes 

Resident  Fish  Habitat 

Maintained 

* The  culvert  that  is  currently  obstructing  fish  passage  where  F.S.  Road  1 07  crosses  Woodtick  Creek  will  be  corrected  through  KV  funding  with  Alternatives 
2,  3,  4,  5,  6,  and  2A,  but  is  not  scheduled  to  be  corrected  under  Alternative  1 , the  No  Action  Alternative.  Habitat  would  be  maintained  but  not  improved 
under  this  alternative. 

**  Anadromous  and  resident  fish  habitat  would  not  be  maintained  in  the  Salt  Creek  drainage,  and  habitat  within  the  mainstem  Moyer  Creek  streamcourse 
below  the  mouth  of  Salt  Creek  would  additionally  be  at  high  risk  of  being  adversely  impacted.  Habitat  would  be  maintained  within  the  Woodtick  Creek, 
Goodluck  Creek,  and  "Perm"  Creek  drainages  under  this  alternative,  however. 


BIOLOGICAL  DIVERSITY  - See  TES  and  Wildlife  Sections 


THREATENED,  ENDANGERED  AND  SENSITIVE  FISH  SPECIES 

(The  final  biological  assessment  of  effects  to  T & E fish  species  is  being  documented  within  the  Salmon  National 
Forest’s  Proposed  Activity  Review  for  the  Panther  Creek  Watershed.  Concurrence  from  the  National  Marin® 
Fisheries  Service  is  unknown  at  this  time). 


Effects  to  Listed 
Fish  T & E 

Species  and  Their  Habitat 

No  Effect 

Not  LTAA* 

LTAA* 

Not  LTAA* 

Not  LTAA* 

Not  LTAA* 

Not  LTAA* 

Effects  to  Poten- 
tial Fish 
T & E Habitat 

No  Change 
from  Ex- 
isting 
Condition 

Improve- 
ment in 
Woodtick 
Creek 

Improve- 
ment in 
Woodtick 
Creek 

Degradation 
in  Sait  and 
Moyer  Creeks 

Improve- 
ment in 
Woodtick 
Creek 

Improve- 
ment in 
Woodtick 
Crseek 

Improve- 
ment in 
Woodtick 
Creek 

Improve- 
ment in 
Woodtick 
Creek 

Effects  to 
Region  4 Sensi- 
tive Fish  Species 
and  Their  Habitat 

No  Effect 

*Not  LTAA 

*LTAA 
Steelhead 
and  Bull 
Trout 

*Not  LTAA 

‘NOT  LTAA 

*Not  LTAA 

‘Not  LTAA 

* LTAA  - Likely  to  Adversely  Affect 

THREATENED,  ENDANGERED  AND  SENSITIVE  VERTEBRATE  SPECIES 


Effects  to 
Gray  Wolf 

* LTAA  - Likely  to  Adversely  Affect 


Summary  - 34 


Not 

LTAA 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Summary 


TABLE  I,  continued:  COMPARISON  OF  EFFECTS  OF  THE  ALTERNATIVES  BY  RESOURCE 


Measurement 

Indices 


ALT  ALT  ALT  ALT 

12  3 4 


ALT 

5 


ALT  ALT 

6 2A 

PREFERRED 


VISUAL  RESOURCES 

Number  of  Units  0 0 0 5 0 0 0 

Where  Visual 
Quality  Objectives 
Are  Not  Met 


RECREATION 

Acres  Converted  0 6,990  6,310  6,990  0 6,990  6,990 

from  Semi-Primitive 
Motorized  & Nonmotorized 
to  Roaded  Natural  Appearing 


AIR  QUALITY 

State  and  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes 

National  Air  Quality 
Standards  Met 


TRANSPORTATION  AND  ACCESS 

Acres  available  1,600  1,600  1,600  1,600  1,600  1,600  1,600 

for  timber  harvesting  with 
existing  road  system 

Acres  available  0 2,807  1,824  2,957  150  2,957  2,807 

for  timber  harvesting  with 
proposed  road  system 

Miles  of  Road  0 16.8  14.6  17.8  1.1  17.8  16.8 

Constructed 


MINERALS 

Would  interfere  No  No  No  No  No  No  No 

with  potential 
mineral  development 


Summary  - 35 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EiS 


Summary 


TABLE  I,  continued:  COMPARISON  OF  EFFECTS  OF  THE  ALTERNATIVES  BY  RESOURCE 


Measurement 

Indices 


ALT  ' ALT  ALT 

1 2 3 


ALT  ALT 

4 5 


ALT  ALT 

6 2A 

PREFERRED 


CULTURAL  RESOURCES 

4 Potential  None  Low  Low  Low  Low  Low  Low 

Impacts  to 

Cultural 

Resources 

4 A cultural  resources  survey  will  be  completed  before  any  ground  disturbing  activities  begin.  Approximately  95%  of  the  area  was  cleared  by  SHPO  on 
8/18/92.  Clearance  is  expected  by  8/1/93  on  the  remaining  5%  of  the  area. 


RANGE  RESOURCES 

Change  in  Range  None 

Resource 


Minor  Im- 
provement 


Minor  Im- 
provement 


Minor  Im- 
provement 


Minor  Im- 
provement 


Minor  Im- 
provement 


Minor  Im- 
provement 


Summary  - 36 


Chapter  I 


Purpose  and 
Need 


Changes  Between  the  Draft  and 


FInai 

1=1 

Proposed  Action 

1-1 

Purpose  of  and  Meed 

for  Action 

1-1 

Location  and  Access 

1-4 

The  Forest  Plan 

1-4 

Management  Area  Goals 

I-® 

Scope  or  the  Proposed  Action 

1-8 

The  NEPA  Process 

1-8 

Scoping  and  the 

Identification  of  Issues 

1-9 

Environmental  issues  and 

Concerns 

1-10 

Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Chapter  S 


CHAPTER  S 

PURPOSE  OF  AND  NEED  FOR  ACTION 


CHANGES  BETWEEN  THE  DRAFT  AND  FINAL 

The  US  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service  have  added  the 
Endangered  gray  wolf  to  their  species  list.  A Biologi- 
cal Assessment  was  prepared  to  assess  the  effects 
of  this  timber  sale  on  the  gray  wolf. 

PROPOSED  ACTION 

The  Forest  Service  proposes  to  harvest  timber,  con- 
struct and  reconstruct  roads,  and  regenerate  new 
stands  of  trees  in  portions  of  the  Moyer  Creek,  Salt 
Creek,  Woodtick  Creek,  and  Goodluck  Creek 
drainages,  and  Pete’s  Gulch  in  the  Cobalt  Ranger 
District  of  the  Salmon  National  Forest  (Figure  1-1 , 
Vicinity  Map).  The  proposed  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale 
(formerly  the  Moyer  Salt  and  Salt  Creek  Timber 
Sales)  was  originally  disclosed  in  the  Notice  of  In- 
tent in  the  July  6,  1990,  Federal  Register,  and  is 
included  as  Alternative  2 in  Chapter  II.  The  pro- 
posed timber  harvesting  and  road  construction  ac- 
tivities would  harvest  about  568  acres  in  a maximum 
of  32  units  and  construct  about  16.8  miles  of  road. 
Trees  harvested  from  these  units  would  yield  ap- 
proximately 4.9  million  board  feet  (mmbf)  of  timber. 
The  Moyer  Salt  and  Salt  Creek  Timber  Sale  would 
be  offered  for  sale  in  1993;  the  timing  of  timber 
harvesting  would  be  staggered  between  two  wildlife 
subdivisions. 


PURPOSE  OF  AND  NEED  FOR  ACTION 

The  action  alternatives  outlined  in  this  proposal  are 
designed  to  implement  the  silvicultural  objectives 
and  goals  of  the  1 988  Salmon  National  Forest  Land 
and  Resource  Management  Plan  (Forest  Plan).  The 
ultimate  goal  of  these  objectives  is  to  meet  the  de- 
sired future  condition  (DFC)  of  the  Forest  as  estab- 
lished in  the  Forest  Plan  (Forest  Plan,  IV  89-90).  The 
standards  and  guidelines  that  dictate  how  these 


silvicultural  management  activities  are  implemented 
would  be  followed.  More  specifically  the  proposal 
has  the  following  purposes: 

The  proposed  action  alternatives  are  designed  to 
help  provide  a continuous  flow  of  raw  materials  to 
dependent  manufacturing  communities  and 
thereby  provide  community  stability,  it  is  also  de= 
signed  to  enable  the  public  to  gather  firewood. 
The  proposed  action  Is  consistent  with  maintain- 
ing the  customs  and  cultures  of  these 
communities. 

The  economies  in  Lemhi  and  Custer  Counties  in 
Idaho  and  Ravalli  County,  Montana,  are  dependent 
in  part  on  Forest  resources  for  grass,  timber  and 
water  (Lemhi  County  Report,  1990).  This  demand 
from  the  Salmon  National  Forest  and  parts  of  the 
Cobalt  Ranger  District  has  been  strong  and  is  ex- 
pected to  increase. 

The  Forest  Plan  designated  areas  that  are  suitable 
for  timber  production,  and  has  identified  an  annual 
allowable  sale  quantity  (ASQ)  from  this  land  base  of 
approximately  21  million  board  feet  (mmbf)  of  tim- 
ber. One  purpose  of  this  proposed  timber  sale  ac- 
tion is  to  contribute,  in  part,  to  the  Forest  Plan  objec- 
tive of  partially  satisfying  the  commercial  demand 
for  timber  (Forest  Plan,  1988,  111-4).  This  objective 
will  provide  for  community  stability  in  the  Forest’s 
area  of  influence  and  is  consistent  with  the  customs 
and  culture  of  these  communities. 

If  the  Selected  Alternative  provides  less  timber  vol- 
ume than  the  alternative  that  meets  the  maximum 
Forest  Plan  Volume  (Alternative  6 - the  Preferred 
Alternative),  the  reasons  for  providing  the  lesser  vol- 
ume will  be  addressed  in  the  Record  of  Decision 
and  the  shortfall  will  not  be  offered  during  this  plan- 
ning period.  (See  Table  11-2,  Timber  Resource:). 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  ESS 


Chapter ! 


The  proposed  action  alternatives  are  designed  to 
Improve  the  growth  and  vigor  of  the  Forest 
through  silvicultural  treatments  that  would  pro- 
duce a more  vigorous  distribution  ©f  size  and  age 
classes  ©f  timber  stands  as  well  as  increase  the 
vegetative  and  structural  diversity  of  the  Forest. 

The  desired  future  condition  of  areas  available  for 
timber  management  as  established  by  the  Forest 
Plan  shall  contain  a specific  distribution  of  timber 
stand  ages  in  the  year  2030  (Forest  Plan,  IV-90,  and 
Chapter  III:  Vegetation,  this  document).  This  age 
distribution  would  provide  a distribution  of  size  and 
age  of  timber  that  would  maintain  a continuous  sup- 
ply of  timber  in  the  future,  provide  future  Forest 
managers  with  a wide  array  of  harvest  alternatives, 
create  timber  stands  that  are  more  resistant  to  in- 
sect and  disease  infestations  than  existing  stands, 
and  improve  the  overall  health  of  the  forest 
ecosystem. 

Many  of  the  trees  in  the  project  area  are  old;  they  are 
mature  (e.g.  they  have  attained  full  development 
and  are  capable  of  seed  production)  or  overmature 
(they  have  passed  maturity  and  are  in  a state  of 
declining  health  and  vigor).  Many  of  the  timber 
stands  are  made  up  of  trees  that  are  alive  but  not 
growing  due  to  insect  and  disease  activity  and 
physical  breakdown.  In  some  stands,  growth  has 
stopped,  is  progressing  at  an  extremely  slow  rate, 
or  is  negative  (loss  of  wood  to  mortality  is  greater 
than  wood  gain  through  growth).  To  improve  the 
health  and  productivity  of  the  forest  it  is  necessary 
to  1)  diversify  the  stands  of  overmature  and  mature 
trees  and  create  a wider  range  of  ages;  and  2) 
enhance  the  forest’s  vegetative  and  structural  diver- 
sity. As  a result  of  the  high  mortality  rate  in  these 
stands,  an  abundance  of  highly  combustible  dead 
material  is  lying  on  the  ground  in  many  of  these 
stands,  creating  a fire  hazard.  Timber  harvest  in 
these  stands  would  reduce  and  redistribute  this  ma- 
terial and  would  decrease  the  risk  of  large  wildfires. 

Timber  harvesting  and  timber  stand  improvement 
(TSI)  activities  are  an  integral  part  of  silvicultural 
management  of  the  timber  resource  for  long-term 
needs.  These  activities  are  conducted  to  increase 
the  growth  rate  and  productivity  of  the  stands,  im- 
prove the  quality  of  the  stands,  maintain  desirable 
species  composition,  manage  insect  and  disease 
activity,  improve  aesthetics,  and  generally  maintain 


productive  stand  conditions.  TSI  activities  consist 
primarily  of  thinning  of  overstocked  stands  (stands 
that  have  more  trees  growing  on  them  than  is  desir- 
able for  vigorous  growth)  and  release  cutting  (re- 
moving competing  trees  that  inhibit  or  prevent 
growth  in  younger  trees). 

The  proposed  action  alternatives  are  designed  to 
improve  the  health  of  the  Forest  by  applying  coor- 
dinated Forest  insect  and  disease  management 
strategies  and  techniques  that  would  reduce 
damage  and  loss  due  to  insects  and  diseases. 

Loss  of  timber  due  to  insects  and  disease  is  con- 
trary to  the  management  direction  established  in  the 
Forest  Plan.  Insect  and  disease  management  direc- 
tion is  to  prevent  or  suppress  insect  and  disease 
populations  that  threaten  Forest  tree  stands  using 
an  Integrated  Pest  Management  (IPM)  approach 
consistent  with  resource  management  objectives 
(Forest  Plan,  IV-71-75). 

Within  the  analysis  area  established  for  the  pro- 
posed action,  Douglas-fir  stands  are  showing  the 
effects  of  defoliation  by  western  spruce  budworm, 
and  Douglas-fir  beetle  attacks  have  been  numerous 
due  to  stress  conditions  created  by  prolonged 
drought.  Many  lodgepole  pine  stands  are  infected 
with  dwarf  mistletoe  and  some  are  infected  by 
mountain  pine  beetles.  Subalpine  fir  trees  are  local- 
ly infested  with  western  balsam  bark  beetle.  Forest 
Plan  direction  emphasizes  harvesting  susceptible 
and  infected  stands  (Forest  Plan,  IV-90),  with  priority 
given  to  overmature  or  deteriorating  stands  (Forest 
Plan,  IV-73-75).  This  allows  harvesting  of  infected  or 
susceptible  stands  while  the  timber  has  marketable 
value.  Enhancement  of  species  diversity  of  the  ex- 
isting stands  and  the  stands  of  trees  that  regenerate 
the  site,  and  selection  of  less  susceptible  species  in 
the  regenerated  stands  would  also  reduce  loss  to 
insects  and  diseases. 

Further  discussion  of  the  Forest  Plan  and  its  silvicul- 
tural goals  and  objectives  is  found  in  the  Record  of 
Decision  for  the  Salmon  Forest  Plan,  April  1988 
(page  12);  the  Final  Environmental  Impact  State- 
ment for  the  Salmon  National  Forest  Land  and  Re- 
source Management  Plan  (Chapter  IV,  page  33); 
and  the  Salmon  Forest  Plan  (Chapter  IV,  pages  1 to 
4,  17,  89). 


I - 2 


VICINITY  MAP 


FIGURE  1-1 
VICINITY  MAP 


Moyer  SaSt  Timber  Sale  Draft  ESS 


Chapter  I 


LOCATION  AND  ACCESS 

The  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  is  located  approxi- 
mately 22  air  miles  southwest  of  Salmon,  Idaho  (Fig- 
ure 1-2,  Location  Map).  The  analysis  area  for  this 
timber  sale  (shown  on  Figure  1-2)  includes  the  pro- 
posed timber  units  and  surrounding  area  where  di- 
rect, indirect,  and  cumulative  effects  would  occur  if 
the  proposed  action  is  implemented  and  where  the 
analysis  of  effects  would  be  performed.  In  addition 
to  the  analysis  area  described  above,  the  area  of 
analysis  for  each  resource  may  vary  from  that 
shown  in  Figure  1-2,  and  is  specified  for  each  re- 
source in  Chapter  III,  Affected  Environment. 

Of  the  approximately  1 5,360  acres  in  this  analysis 
area,  an  estimated  9,920  acres  are  located  within 
the  northern  portion  of  the  Taylor  Mountain  Road- 
less Area.  This  roadless  area  is  listed  as  No.  13902 
on  the  Salmon  National  Forest  and  as  No.06902  on 
the  Challis  National  Forest.  The  area  was  formerly 
listed  as  RARE  II  No.4502. 

The  analysis  area  is  accessed  from  the  west  by  the 
Panther  Creek  Road  (F.S.  Road  055)  and  the  Cop- 
per Creek-Swan  Peak  Road  (F.S.  Road  099).  F.S. 
Road  107  intersects  F.S.  Road  099  in  Section  28, 
T20N,  R19E,  and  crosses  Little  Woodtick  Creek  and 
Woodtick  Creek  before  entering  the  analysis  area. 
This  road  was  built  as  a timber  access  road  for 
harvesting  the  1989  Tick  Creek  timber  sale.  From 
the  east  the  analysis  area  is  accessed  by  the 
Salmon  River  Mountain  Road  ("Ridge  Road")  (F.S. 
Road  020)  and  the  eastern  portion  of  F.S.  Road  099. 
Forest  Service  Road  106  (Swan  Peak  Road)  inter- 
sects F.S.  Road  099  in  Section  2,  T19N,  R19E,  and 
accesses  the  eastern  part  of  the  analysis  area. 


THE  FOREST  PLAN 

Long-term  management  direction  for  the  Forest  was 
established  in  the  1988  Salmon  National  Forest 
Land  and  Resource  Management  Plan  (Forest 
Plan),  approved  in  January,  1988.  In  approving  the 
Forest  Plan,  the  Regional  Forester  established  the 
following  items: 

* The  Desired  Future  Condition  (DFC)  of  the 
Forest  for  all  resources  and  uses  of  the  For- 
est; 


* Forest  Plan  multiple  use  goals  and  objec- 
tives, and  management  standards  and 
guidelines  to  achieve  them; 

* Monitoring  and  evaluation  requirements  to 
determine  whether  the  goals  and  objectives 
are  being  met  and  standards  and  guidelines 
of  the  Forest  Plan  are  being  used; 

* Management  Areas,  or  sub-units  of  the  For- 
est with  similar  management  goals  and  a 
common  management  prescription; 

* Lands  suited  for  timber  management  and  the 
maximum  amount  of  timber  that  may  be  sold 
from  those  lands  during  the  ten  year  plan- 
ning period  for  the  Forest  Plan  (Allowable 
Sale  Quantity);  and 

* Lands  recommended  for  wilderness  classifi- 
cation and  land  use  allocations  for  invento- 
ried roadless  areas  not  recommended  for 
wilderness. 

The  proposed  activities  are  designed  to  implement 
the  Forest  Plan.  This  Final  Environmental  Impact 
Statement  (FEIS)  contains  a detailed,  site-specific 
analysis  which  supplements  the  Forest  Plan  EIS 
and  which  focuses  on  the  environmental  effects  and 
alternatives  relating  to  the  proposed  action.  This 
analysis  is  therefore  tiered  to  the  Forest  Plan  EIS 
and  Record  of  Decision,  which  are  incorporated  by 
reference  at  the  appropriate  passages  throughout 
this  Final  EIS.  This  document  also  discloses  the 
analysis  and  implementation  of  management  prac- 
tices designed  to  achieve  the  goals  and  objectives 
of  the  Forest  Plan. 

For  a more  detailed  discussion  of  the  role  of  the 
Salmon  National  Forest  in  managing  the  Forest  tim- 
ber resources,  refer  to  the  following  documentation: 
Record  of  Decision  for  the  Salmon  National  Forest 
Land  and  Resource  Management  Plan,  January 
1988  (pages  13  to  15);  Final  EIS  for  the  Salmon 
National  Forest  Land  and  Resource  Management 
Plan  (Chapter  II  page  137,  Chapter  IV  pages  28  to 
39);  and  the  Salmon  National  Forest  Land  and  Re- 
source Management  Plan  (Chapter  IV,  pages 
2,82,89,90).  Other  management  direction  is  includ- 
ed in  the  Salmon  National  Forest  Noxious  Weed 
Control  Program  Environmental  Assessment  (EA) 


1-4 


> 1 ?*'  *&>  1 T 9I9S 

!«•-  V>/  ' I ’0,".. 


aoiorv 

Pea*-  -I 


’t 


V 


'T  l pr 


q*£E 


tT 


A 

*m  0596'L 

A 

SAJLMON 


V1  * 


>g7» 


/ 1 Baldy 

**<*o  fodl-r*  C«^ 9 | 49 
/6  vSor  ' 


RANGER | 


yjS^l ' 

r--\7 

'i03~^'  c^l 

4 - 


A>f 


y MT « A A 

J Lfcl_  . 1_ 


A 


-*K*-v  \ 


?C^;. 


DISTRICT 

Curley 


*%■' 


C •'*'  //  I 1 N\ 

nU*rmf> 


Willihms  Lr  3CNk  ’*> 

. ySurr^m.t  , ,£  '/  . 

X Ttssr, **%*&£&- 

Vv| c^u 


■’ 

■'7577 

70  ^ 

"»»'A 

Vfe**tN6li 


17406  \ ^ 'f=  = ^^v 

I „ ''l"-f5\  I I /»  I I 

jj£z^.-J<r\. 1 


\ 7496.r'--=si> 


i v\g 

i f , 

L ?o6tx»  *30*. 


| foot*  ^3t>*.  ■; 

, I***-*  ••’ 77f  0 '•/  i 

^aI  S 


I Lgjl«  1 > 

,'  'Aa  I I O ' *»06 

'^vgL> 


-,-y^-l-A 

^ 

i ' — i#  . * •»  ’J 

T ayler  9j>60  *->| 


v 6050; . ’ '' 

i i . i 


I tikes  > 

R19E 


LEGEND 


ANALYSIS  AREA 


A.  ! u#|!  1 L 

-nT- 

V-  ■?  . O) 


Clt^Io 


SCALE 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


FIGURE  1-2 
LOCATION  MAP 


-4-  — 
% 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  ESS 


Chapter 


and  in  other  amendments  to  the  Forest  Plan  refer- 
enced throughout  this  document. 


Management  Area  OoaSs 

The  Salmon  Forest  Plan  Management  Area  (MA) 
prescriptions  in  the  Forest  Plan  (Chapter  ill,  93-1 60) 
identify  the  management  activities  that  will  occur  on 
the  area  of  land  covered  by  that  prescription.  Al- 
though these  are  multi-functional  management  ac- 
tivities that  are  designed  to  achieve  the  goals  and 
objectives  established  by  the  Forest  Plan,  each 
Management  Area  prescription  places  an  emphasis 
on  management  of  one  or  several  Forest  resources. 
The  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  analysis  area  contains 
MA  prescriptions  that  have  a dual  emphasis  on 
aquatic  habitat  management  and  timber  manage- 
ment. These  MAs  are  shown  in  Figure  1-3  and  de- 
scribed below: 

Management  Areas  3A-5A,  3A-5B,  and 
3A-5C 

Management  emphasis  in  areas  with  a 3A 
prescription  is  on  anadromous  fish  species 
habitat  needs.  Habitat  quality  and  quantity 
will  be  commensurate  with  meeting  or  ex- 
ceeding Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game 
anadromous  fish  planning  goals  and  require- 
ments for  listed  and  proposed  threatened 
and  endangered  fish  species  established  by 
the  National  Marine  Fisheries  Service.  Tim- 
ber harvest  and  management  is  compatible, 
but  the  activity,  intensity  and  timing  of  timber 
harvesting  will  be  appropriate  to  meeting 
habitat  quality  goals. 

Management  emphasis  in  areas  with  5A,  5B, 
and  5C  prescriptions  is  on  a high  (5A),  mod- 
erate (5B),  or  low  (5C)  commercial  sawtimber 
production  and  utilization  while  maintaining 
habitat  for  target  or  viable  populations  of  all 
native  vertebrate  species  of  fish  and  wildlife. 


Management  Area  3A-4A 

Emphasis  for  prescription  3A  is  on  meeting 
anadromous  fish  habitat  needs,  as  de- 
scribed above.  Emphasis  for  prescription  4A 
is  to  provide  for  big  game  habitat  needs  such 
as  forage  and  cover  on  key  big  game  winter 
range.  Treatments  to  increase  forage  pro- 
duction, alter  plant  species  composition,  or 
to  create  or  maintain  hiding  and  thermal  cov- 
er for  big  game  are  applied.  Vegetation  ma- 
nipulation is  allowed  for  enhancement  of 
habitat. 

All  of  the  timber  harvesting  activities  in  the  action 
alternatives  described  in  this  document  would  be 
confined  to  the  3A-5A,  3A-5B,  and  3A-5C  manage- 
ment areas.  A very  short  segment  of  the  timber 
access  road  for  the  Salt  Creek  portion  of  the  timber 
cutting  units  for  Alternative  3 crosses  the  southeast- 
ern portion  of  the  3A-4A  management  area;  all  other 
roads  are  in  3A-5A,  3A-5B,  and  3A-5C  management 
areas.  The  3A-4A  management  area  is  included  in 
the  analysis  area  because  all  of  these  activities 
could  directly  or  indirectly  affect  the  fish  and  big 
game  habitat  in  the  area  and  these  potential  effects 
must  be  analyzed. 

The  goal  of  vegetation  management  for  lands  within 
those  MA’s  that  are  available  and  suitable  for  timber 
production  is  to  provide  vigorous  and  healthy 
stands  which  would:  1)  have  a broad  representation 
of  various  age  and  size  classes;  2)  exhibit  diversity 
of  tree  species;  3)  have  reduced  threat  from  insect, 
disease,  and  wildfire;  4)  be  growing  at  or  near  opti- 
mum site  productivity,  and  5)  provide  suitable  habi- 
tat to  sustain  minimum  viable  populations  of  all 
wildlife  species  (Forest  Plan,  IV-1  -2, 1 1 6-1 39).  A flow 
of  sawlogs  and  other  products  would  be  produced 
to  satisfy  demands  for  forest  products.  Standards 
and  guidelines  specified  in  the  Forest  Plan  wilt  en- 
sure that  wildlife  habitat  for  target  or  viable  popula- 
tions of  all  native  vertebrate  fish  and  wildlife  species 
will  be  provided  and,  in  some  situations,  will  be 
improved  by  vegetation  management. 


e/ibort 


T19N 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Saie  Draft  EIS 


Chapter  I 


SCOPE  OF  THE  PROPOSED  ACTION 

The  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  and  Salt  Creek  Timber 
Sale  areas  were  determined  to  be  suitable  for  timber 
harvesting  and  were  delineated  as  timber  sale  areas 
in  the  1 988  Forest  Plan.  Timber  harvesting  in  these 
areas  is  currently  ready  for  a decision  concerning 
proceeding  with  site-specific  harvesting  and  road 
construction  in  these  sale  areas.  Although  the  pro- 
posed timber  harvest  activities  on  each  of  these  two 
timber  sales  could  proceed  independently  of  the 
other,  they  were  combined  into  one  timber  sale  (the 
■Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale*)  and  are  addressed  as  one 
sale  in  this  EIS  because:  1)  they  are  geographically 
close  and  their  transportation  systems  overlap;  2) 
the  potential  for  cumulative  environmental  effects 
can  be  assessed;  and  3)  the  timing  of  one  sale  can 
be  easily  controlled  to  allow  for  use  of  wildlife  subdi- 
visions. 

The  scope  of  the  proposed  action  is  limited  to  the 
specific  timber  harvesting,  forest  regeneration,  road 
construction  and  reconstruction,  and  associated 
activities  identified  in  Chapter  II.  This  final  EIS  is  a 
site-specific  National  Environmental  Policy  Act 
(NEPA)  document  that  addresses  the  effects  of  only 
these  activities.  The  proposed  action  is  not  a gener- 
al management  plan  for  the  area,  and  this  is  not  a 
programmatic  EIS. 


DECISIONS  TO  BE  MADE 
BASED  ON  THIS  ANALYSIS 

Based  on  the  analysis  documented  in  this  environ- 
mental impact  statement,  the  Salmon  National  For- 
est Supervisor  will  make  the  following  decisions: 

* Should  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Area 
be  entered  for  timber  harvest  and 
management-related  activities  at  this 
time? 

If  it  is  decided  to  enter  the  area  for  timber  manage- 
ment now, 

* How  much  timber  should  be  harvested? 

By  what  methods  should  the  timber  be 

harvested? 


What  management  requirements,  mitiga- 
tion measures  and  monitoring  are  neces- 
sary to  protect  other  resources  and  to 
achieve  other  resource  goals,  objectives 
and  desired  future  conditions? 


THE  NEPA  PROCESS 

This  Final  EIS  was  developed  under  the  implement- 
ing regulations  of  the  National  Environmental  Policy 
Act  (NEPA),  Council  on  Environmental  Quality 
(CEQ),  Title  40,  Code  of  Federal  Regulations,  Parts 
1500-1 508  (40  CFR  1500-1 508);  and  the  National 
Forest  Management  Act  (NFMA),  Title  36,  Code  of 
Federal  Regulations,  Part  219  (36  CFR  219). 

NEPA  analysis  began  with  the  identification  of  the 
proposed  action  as  published  in  the  Notice  of  Intent. 
This  proposal  was  based  on  Forest  Service  knowl- 
edge of  the  current  condition  of  the  area  and  Forest 
Plan  direction.  The  proposed  action  was  the  starting 
point  for  a detailed,  site-specific  NEPA  analysis  of 
the  potential  environmental  effects  of  the  proposed 
action. 

A 45  day  public  comment  period  was  allowed  after 
the  issuance  of  the  Draft  Environmental  Impact 
Statement  (DEIS).  Comments  were  read,  catego- 
rized and  coded  into  a computer  program  specifi- 
cally designed  for  content  analysis. 

Public  comments  were  used  by  the  Interdisciplinary 
Team  and  Forest  Supervisor  to  scope  additional 
issues  not  previously  considered;  evaluate  the  need 
for  revising  and  analyzing  new  alternatives;  and 
choosing  a preferred  alternative. 

A 30  day  public  comment  period  will  begin  after 
issuance  of  this  Final  Environmental  Impact  State- 
ment (FEIS)  and  publication  of  the  notice  of  avail- 
ability in  the  Federal  Register. 

A Record  of  Decision  will  be  released  after  the  pub- 
lic comment  period.  If  the  Forest  Supervisor  selects 
an  action  alternative  in  the  Record  of  Decision,  im- 
plementation of  the  activities  specifically  identified 
in  that  alternative  would  begin  in  1993  and  without 
further  NEPA  documentation. 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Chapter  E 


APPEAL  PROCESS 

A 45  day  appeal  period  will  follow  the  Record  of 

Decision. 

FINAL  EIS  DOCUMENT  ORGANIZATION 

This  document  consists  of  the  following  main  chap- 
ters: 

Chapter  I - Purpose  of  and  Need  for  Action: 
Describes  the  proposed  action,  purpose  of  and 
need  for  action,  Forest  Plan  direction,  project 
area  location,  decisions  to  be  made,  scoping, 
and  issues  and  concerns  associated  with  the 
proposal. 

Chapter  II  - Alternatives:  Describes  seven  al- 
ternative ways  (including  taking  no  action)  of 
addressing  or  resolving  environmental  issues 
and  management  concerns  related  to  imple- 
mentation of  this  proposal.  How  the  six  action 
alternatives  wholly  or  partially  meet  the  purpose 
of  and  need  for  the  proposed  action  is  de- 
scribed. A comparison  is  made  of  the  environ- 
mental impacts  and  effects  of  each  alternative. 

Chapter  Ilf  - Affected  Environment:  Discusses 
the  existing  environment  affected  by  the  alter- 
natives by  resource.  Forest  Plan  management 
direction,  the  scope  of  analysis,  the  existing 
condition,  and  the  effects  of  past  management 
of  each  of  the  specific  resources  is  discussed. 

Chapter  IV  - Environmental  Consequences: 

Discloses  the  environmental  consequences  of 
implementing  the  alternatives,  using  the  de- 
scriptions in  Chapter  III  as  the  baseline  for  mea- 
surement. Potential  direct,  indirect  and  cumula- 
tive effects  are  described  and  the  effectiveness 
of  mitigation  measures  is  assessed.  Unavoid- 
able adverse  effects  are  listed,  including  irre- 
versible and  irretrievable  commitments  of  re- 
sources. 

Chapter  V - List  of  Preparers:  Contains  a list- 
ing of  the  individuals  who  contributed  to  this 
Final  EIS,  including  names,  educational  qualifi- 
cations, and  years  of  direct  experience  relating 
to  resource  management. 


Chapter  VI  - Public  Involvement  and  Com- 
ments: Includes  a summary  of  scoping  and 
public  involvement  activities  prior  to  the  Final 
EIS. 

Bibliography:  Provides  the  sources  for  all  mate- 
rial referenced  in  the  text. 

Glossary:  Defines  terms  used  in  the  text  that 
may  be  unfamiliar  or  specialized.  Acronyms  are 
defined  with  their  first  usage  in  the  text. 

Appendices:  Contains  the  biological  assess- 
ments and  evaluations,  analytical  reports,  and 
site-specific  or  supplementary  information  that 
adds  depth  to  the  discussions  in  the  main  chap- 
ters. 

Index:  Provides  a chapter  or  section  and  page 
reference  for  key  words  in  the  body  of  the  EIS 
and  appendices. 

Comment  Letters  and  Response:  contains 
public  comment  letters  on  the  DEIS  and  the 
Salmon  National  Forest’s  response  to  these 
comments.  This  section  was  printed  and  bound 
separate  from  the  main  document  and  is  a sup- 
plement to  Chapter  VI  - Scoping  and  Public 
Involvement 

A Project  File  was  created  during  development  of 
the  Final  EIS  that  contains  the  background  data, 
supporting  documentation,  issues  analysis,  ID  team 
meeting  notes,  maps  and  other  pertinent  material. 
The  project  file  is  located  in  the  Salmon  National 
Forest  Supervisor’s  Office. 


SCOPING  AND  THE 
IDENTIFICATION  OF  ISSUES 

Interna!  Scoping  and  the  Public 
Involvement  Process 

An  interdisciplinary  team  (ID  Team)  with  members 
representing  various  affected  resources  was  creat- 
ed early  in  the  NEPA  analysis  process.  This  team 
reviewed  management  direction  given  in  the  Forest 
Plan  and  other  documents,  and  initiated  discussion 
with  other  Forest  Sen/ice  personnel  regarding  the 
proposed  action  and  its  potential  effects  on  the  area 


1-9 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Chapter  I 


resources.  This  internal  scoping  process  identified 
potential  issues  related  to  implementation  of  the 
proposed  action  that  would  be  addressed  in  the  EIS 
(See  Project  File,  Public  Involvement:  ID  Team  meet- 
ing notes).  Other  agencies  with  jurisdiction  in  the 
analysis  area  were  notified  of  the  proposed  action 
and  invited  to  comment. 

Additional  issues  were  identified  during  the  public 
involvement  process.  Scoping  and  public  and  inter- 
agency involvement  activities  are  discussed  in  more 
detail  in  Chapter  VI  of  this  document.  During  the 
public  participation  process,  individuals  expressed 
concerns  and  provided  insights  which  helped  re- 
solve possible  resource  conflicts.  Concerns  and  in- 
sights were  documented  (see  Project  File,  Public 
Involvement:  Comments  and  ID  Team  meeting 
notes)  and  then  tracked  through  the  analysis  pro- 
cess (Project  File,  Issues  Analysis). 

During  the  public  involvement  scoping  process,  nu- 
merous topics  were  mentioned  as  possible  con- 
cerns relating  to  road  construction  and  timber  har- 
vesting. A list  of  the  topics  raised  and  the  parties 
who  brought  them  to  the  attention  of  the  Salmon 
National  Forest  can  be  found  in  Chapter  VI.  These 
topics  were  addressed  by  the  Forest  staff  of  re- 
source specialists,  and,  based  upon  their  recom- 
mendations, were  either  analyzed  in  the  Final  EIS 
or,  for  specific  reasons,  found  inappropriate  for  fur- 
ther analysis  in  this  EIS. 

Additional  comments  received  during  the  public 
comment  period  that  followed  issuance  of  the  Draft 
EIS  were  analyzed  and  discussed  in  the  Final  EIS. 
These  included  three  new  alternatives  which  were 
analyzed  in  detail. 


ENVIRONMENTAL  ISSUES  AND  CONCERNS 

Issues  that  were  identified  in  the  scoping  process 
and  discussed  in  this  EIS  include  those  issues  or 
concerns  that  displayed  a concern  that  the  pro- 
posed management  action  might  1)  yield  a de- 
tectable effect  to  the  human  environment,  2)  and/or 
be  highly  controversial,  3)  and/or  fall  within  the 
scope  of  this  site-specific  EIS.  As  directed  by  the 
CEQ  regulations,  the  level  of  analysis  and  disclo- 
sure of  these  issues  is  proportional  to  the  impor- 
tance of  the  issue  in  the  context  of  the  proposed 


activities  (40  CFR 1 502.2(b)).  Thus,  some  issues  are 
discussed  in  more  depth  than  others  throughout 
this  document.  The  topics  recommended  for  in- 
depth  analysis  include:  vegetation,  wildlife,  roadless 
character,  and  economics,  soils,  water  quality,  fish- 
eries, biological  diversity,  Threatened,  Endangered 
and  Sensitive  Species,  and  visual  resources.  Other 
issues  discussed  include:  recreation,  air  quality, 
transportation  and  access,  cultural  resources,  min- 
eral resources,  and  range  resources.  Concerns  for 
these  resources  and  mitigations  that  address  those 
concerns  are  discussed  in  the  following  chapters  of 
this  EIS. 


VEGETATION 

How  would  the  ag®  structure,  species  abundance 
and  composition,  and  growth  potential  of  the  veg- 
etation b@  affected? 

Timber  harvesting  affects  the  age  structure,  species 
abundance  and  composition,  and  growth  potential 
of  timber  stands.  The  amount  of  change  depends 
on:  how  many  acres  in  a stand  are  harvested  and 
how  they  are  harvested;  the  ages  of  the  harvested 
units  and  the  amount  of  time  necessary  to  regener- 
ate the  stand  (age  structure);  the  numbers  and 
kinds  of  trees  that  are  harvested  from  a stand  and 
the  species  that  regenerate  on  the  site  (species 
abundance  and  composition);  and  the  number  of 
stands  that  currently  have  little  or  no  growth  that 
would  be  converted  to  young  stands  with  high 
growth  rates;  and  the  post-sale  timber  management 
activities  that  occur  (growth  potential). 

Indices:  The  indices  used  to  measure  the  effects  of 
the  alternatives  on  age  structure,  species  abun- 
dance and  composition,  and  growth  potential  are  1) 
the  number  of  acres  harvested;  2)  the  change  in 
age  class  distribution  before  and  after  timber  har- 
vest; and  3)  the  change  in  species  diversity. 

What  effect  would  the  proposed  action  have  on 
the  health  (particularly  the  Insect  and  disease 
susceptibility)  of  the  timber  stands? 

The  overall  health  of  the  timber  stands  in  the  analy- 
sis area  is  such  that  noticeable  change  will  occur  in 
the  next  60  to  70  years  regardless  of  human  activity. 
Risk  of  substantial  damage  due  to  insect  epidemics 


I - 10 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Chapter  I 


or  large-scale  wildfires  is  high.  Mortality  and  growth 
losses  from  agents  such  as  Western  spruce  bud- 
worm  and  dwarf  mistletoe  are  occurring  and  will 
increase,  particularly  if  the  current  drought  condi- 
tions continue.  Removing  dead  and  infected  timber 
stands  would  not  only  keep  the  infection  from 
spreading  to  other  stands  but  would  reduce  the 
potential  for  wildfires.  Timber  harvest  activities  also 
increases  the  risk  that  noxious  weeds  would  be  in- 
troduced to  the  site.  A weed  control  program  is 
currently  in  place  on  the  Forest  to  control  the  spread 
of  weeds. 

Indices:  The  index  used  to  measure  the  effects  on 
the  health  of  the  forest  is  1)  the  change  in  degree  of 
infestation  by  insects  and  diseases,  and  2)  the  risk 
of  infestation  by  noxious  weeds. 

How  can  the  full  site  productivity  of  these  Man- 
agement Areas  (MAs)  be  managed  to  ensure  an 
adequate  supply  of  timber?  What  timber  products 
would  be  produced  from  these  MAs? 

Concern  has  been  expressed  for  the  retention  of 
local  customs  and  culture  through  maintenance  of 
employment  and  associated  economic  activity  relat- 
ed to  the  harvesting  and  processing  of  timber.  Tim- 
ber industry  representatives  in  eastern  Idaho  and 
southwestern  Montana  has  stressed  the  impor- 
tance of  maintaining  an  adequate  supply  of  timber. 
Larger  trees  that  can  be  used  for  sawtimber  are  in 
demand,  and  uses  of  non-sawtimber  stands  include 
post  and  poles,  firewood  and  house  log  products. 
Timber  management  practices  that  improve  the 
productivity  of  the  Forest  would  give  future  timber 
managers  a wider  array  of  harvesting  options. 

Indices:  The  index  used  to  measure  the  effects  of 
the  alternatives  on  timber  outputs  is  the  volume 
production  in  million  board  feet  (mmbf). 


WILDLIFE 

What  are  the  potential  effects  of  the  proposed 
action  on  elk  and  deer? 

Elk  and  deer  security  and  elk  habitat  potential  are  of 
concern  in  the  analysis  area.  Approximately  half  of 
the  analysis  area  has  been  mapped  as  key  elk  sum- 


mer range  (areas  of  the  elk  summer  range  that  re- 
ceive exceptionally  heavy  use  and  are  important  to 
survival  and/or  productivity).  The  entire  area  re- 
ceives heavy  spring,  summer  and  fall  elk  and  mule 
deer  use  and  limited  elk  and  deer  winter  use.  Timber 
harvesting  and  road  construction  may  cause  tem- 
porary or  short  term  displacement  of  elk  and  deer 
from  these  areas  of  preferred  habitat.  They  move 
from  areas  of  optimal  habitat  to  areas  of  less  optimal 
habitat,  and  experience  a change  in  habitat  param- 
eters such  as  security  and  forage  base.  Disturbance 
close  to  or  displacement  from  an  elk  calving  and 
deer  fawning  area  might  affect  the  number  of  young 
surviving  to  adulthood. 

Elk  habitat  potential  (EHP)  is  used  to  assess  the 
effects  to  elk  and  deer;  although  these  two  big 
game  species  have  different  habitat  requirements, 
they  are  similar  enough  that  one  index  can  be  used. 
Elk  have  much  more  sensitive  habitat  requirements, 
particularly  in  terms  of  hiding  cover,  and  therefore 
meeting  elk  habitat  requirements  would  also  meet 
those  of  deer.  EHP  is  determined  by  using 
covenforage  ratios  and  road  densities.  Cover  is 
vegetation  that  provides  shelter  from  weather  (ther- 
mal cover)  or  will  hide  90  percent  of  an  animal  from 
a human’s  view  at  200  feet  or  less  (hiding  cover). 
Forage  areas  are  man-made  or  natural  openings 
that  provide  food.  A covenforage  ratio  of  40:60  is 
considered  optimum  for  most  habitat  types.  Road 
densities  are  calculated  using  the  miles  of  open 
(open  road  density)  or  closed  (closed  road  density) 
road  for  each  square  mile.  An  EHP  of  100  percent 
(covenforage  ratio  is  40:60  and  road  density  is  0 
miles  per  square  mile)  is  optimal.  Timber  harvest 
would  affect  the  composition  of  vegetation  in  the 
analysis  area  and  therefore  the  covenforage  ratio;  it 
could  improve  the  covenforage  ratio  in  heavily 
forested  areas  with  few  openings.  Road  construc- 
tion would  increase  the  road  density  of  the  area  and 
thus  lower  the  EHP,  however,  all  new  roads  in  the 
analysis  area  would  be  closed  after  timber  harvest- 
ing. 

Habitat  requirements  for  calving  and  non-hunting- 
season  security  are  presently  adequate.  This  har- 
vest and  road  building  process  has  the  potential  to 
reduce  habitat  security  for  big  game,  as  construc- 
tion of  new  roads  would  facilitate  access  to  the  area 
by  hunters  even  if  they  are  closed. 


I - 11 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  ESS 


Chapter  I 


Indices:  The  indices  of  measurement  that  will  be 
used  to  evaluate  the  effects  of  the  alternatives  on  elk 
and  deer  will  be:  1)  elk  habitat  potential  (EHP)  (de- 
rived from  cover-forage  ratio  and  road  density);  2) 
elk  habitat  security;  and  3)  elk  vulnerability. 

What  are  the  potential  effects  of  the  proposed 
action  on  old  growth-dependent  species? 

Goshawk  and  pine  marten  both  require  timber 
stands  with  old-growth  characteristics  for  nesting 
and/or  hunting.  Goshawk  are  dependent  on  even- 
aged  old-growth  Douglas-fir,  lodgepole  pine,  and 
other  tree  species,  and  pine  marten  require  old- 
growth  spruce-fir  forests  for  survival.  These  species 
could  be  affected  by  the  proposed  management 
activities.  Although  none  of  the  old-growth  retention 
stands  identified  in  the  Forest  Plan  (Forest  Plan, 
page  IV-1 9,  and  map  of  record)  would  be  harvested, 
other  stands  which  are  currently  in  an  old  growth 
condition  but  were  not  designated  for  retention  in 
the  Forest  Plan  would  be  affected. 

Indices:  Indices  of  measurement  for  goshawk  and 
pine  marten  will  be:  1 ) the  number  of  acres  of  timber 
stands  with  old  growth  characteristics  within  the 
analysis  area  before  and  after  timber  harvest;  and  2) 
acres  of  Forest  Plan  designated  old-growth  reten- 
tion stands  that  are  cut. 


ROADLESS  CHARACTER 

What  ar©  the  potential  effects  of  the  proposed 
action  on  the  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area? 

Much  of  the  proposed  timber  harvest  would  occur 
within  the  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area  bound- 
ary; the  proposed  activities  would  affect  approxi- 
mately 1 6 percent  of  the  entire  roadless  area.  The 
Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area  is  one  of  30  areas 
on  the  Salmon  National  Forest  inventoried  as  meet- 
ing the  minimum  requirements  for  wilderness.  In  the 
Forest  Plan  the  proposed  harvest  areas  within  the 
roadless  area  have  been  allocated  to  non- 
wilderness management  prescriptions,  including 
management  areas  that  prescribe  timber  manage- 
ment. However,  most  of  the  remainder  of  the  Taylor 
Mountain  Roadless  Area  falls  under  Management 
Area  2A,  which  emphasizes  dispersed  motorized 
semi-primitive  recreation  opportunities  and  is  not 


classed  as  available  for  timber  harvest  unless  the 
timber  is  damaged  by  fire,  windthrow,  or  other 
catastrophic  event  (Forest  Plan,  IV-98-100). 

The  construction  of  roads  and  the  harvest  of  trees 
in  a roadless  area  has  a direct  effect  on  the  social, 
physical  and  biological  attributes  of  the  area.  These 
activities  also  make  it  unlikely  that  Congress  would 
consider  the  analysis  area  for  inclusion  in  the  Na- 
tional Wilderness  Preservation  System  (NWPS)  if  an 
action  alternative  is  selected.  The  roadless  areas 
also  provide  habitat  for  elk  and  other  wildlife  and  are 
therefore  important  to  wildlife  managers  and  sports- 
men. Other  individuals  simply  value  land  without 
roads  or  developments  and  wish  to  preserve  it  for 
the  future.  They  are  concerned  about  the  cumula- 
tive effect  of  removing  areas,  or  even  small  portions 
thereof,  out  of  a roadless  condition. 

Indices:  Indices  of  measurement  that  will  be  used  to 
measure  the  effects  of  the  proposed  action  on  the 
roadless  character  are:  1)  whether  or  not  the  Taylor 
Mountain  Roadless  Area  meets  the  qualifications  for 
further  consideration  as  a wilderness  area;  2)  num- 
ber of  acres  within  the  inventoried  roadless  area 
boundary  that  would  no  longer  be  roadless;  3)  the 
percent  of  the  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area  that 
is  no  longer  roadless;  and  4)  the  effects  on  the 
natural  integrity,  apparent  naturalness,  primitive 
recreation,  solitude,  special  features,  and  special 
places  and  activities  of  the  area. 


ECONOMICS 

Is  Forest  management  of  timber  resources  eco- 
nomically efficient? 

Concern  has  been  raised  that  the  proposed  project 
would  not  be  economically  efficient.  Some  respon- 
dents state  that  timber  sales  should  stress  cost  effi- 
ciency and  should  result  in  long-term  positive  cash 
flow.  However,  the  Multiple  Use  - Sustained  Yield 
Act  of  1960  (16  U.S.C  528)  and  the  National  Forest 
Management  Act  of  1976  (Public  Law  94-588)  re- 
quires that  the  renewable  surface  resources  of  the 
National  Forests  be  managed  such  that  considera- 
tion is  given  to  the  relative  values  of  the  various 
resources  and  not  necessarily  the  combination  of 
uses  that  will  give  the  greatest  dollar  return  or  the 
greatest  unit  output. 


I - 12 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Chapter  i 


Timber  sales  should  contain  the  most  efficient  com- 
bination of  logging  methods,  road  systems,  and  sil- 
vicultural prescriptions  to  meet  the  objectives  of  the 
timber  sale  and  other  resources  in  the  area  Eco- 
nomic analysis  evaluates  the  costs  and  benefits  of 
management  alternatives  to  ensure  that  efficient 
methods  of  achieving  objectives  are  considered  in 
choosing  an  alternative.  Relative  economic  effi- 
ciency of  the  alternatives  is  usually  measured  in 
terms  of  present  net  value  (PNV).  These  measure- 
ments are  calculated  using  the  number  of  board 
feet  sold,  post-sale  costs,  and  the  cost  of  road  con- 
struction. Timber  production  lost  due  to  not  bringing 
a timber  stand  that  has  reached  or  passed  maxi- 
mum productivity  under  management  and  into  pro- 
duction should  also  be  accounted  for. 

Indices:  The  indices  of  measurement  for  compari- 
son of  the  economic  efficiency  of  the  alternatives  will 
be:  1) Present  Net  Value  (PNV);  and  2)  the  gross 
stumpage  value  realized  or  lost;  and  3)  road  costs. 


SOILS 

How  would  the  proposed  activities  affect  the  soil 
resources? 

Timber  harvest  activities  may  affect  soil  productivity 
by  increasing  sedimentation  (and  subsequent  loss 
of  soil),  soil  compaction,  soil  displacement,  and  po- 
tential for  mass  wasting.  The  ability  of  the  soils  to 
produce  vegetation  may  be  compromised  if  soil  pro- 
ductivity is  decreased. 

Soil  disturbance  associated  with  timber  harvest  can 
cause  accelerated  soil  erosion  and  lead  to  in- 
creased sediment  in  streams,  degrading  water 
quality  and  fish  habitat.  Soil  disturbance  occurs 
when  roads  and  landing  areas  are  constructed  and 
when  logs  are  skidded  to  the  landing  areas.  Soil 
compaction  occurs  in  areas  where  heavy  machin- 
ery is  used  such  as  roads,  landings  and  skid  trails, 
and  can  decrease  the  porosity  of  the  soils.  Indi- 
rectly, timber  harvest  activities  can  cause 
mass-wasting,  especially  road  cuts  and  fills,  in  soils 
with  high  mass  wasting  potential.  Timber  harvest 
activities  can  also  directly  affect  soil  resources  by 
committing  the  land  to  uses  other  than  growing  veg- 
etation for  extended  periods  of  time,  particularly  in 
roads  and  landing  areas. 


Indices:  Indices  for  measurement  of  the  effects  to 
soils  are:  1)  acres  of  total  soil  resource  commitment; 
2)  percent  of  analysis  area  with  total  soil  resource 
commitment;  3)  existing  roads;  and  4)  new  roads. 


HYDROLOGY 

WiH  the  proposed  timber  harvest  activities  affect 
the  water  quality  or  volume  in  streams  in  the  anal- 
ysis area? 

Concern  has  been  expressed  that  the  proposed 
timber  harvest  activities  may  increase  sedimenta- 
tion into  streams  in  the  analysis  area.  Soil  disturb- 
ance associated  with  road  construction  and  timber 
harvesting  can  lead  to  increased  erosion  rates  and 
therefore  an  increase  in  the  amount  of  sediment  in 
streams,  degrading  water  quality  and  affecting  fish 
habitat  and  beneficial  uses  of  the  stream.  Removal 
of  vegetation  and  soil  exposure  can  also  increase 
sedimentation  rates.  Additionally,  removal  of  vege- 
tation can  increase  the  peak  flow  rate  and  change 
the  timing  of  peak  flow  during  runoff.  Increased 
peak  flow  can  lead  to  changes  in  stream  channel 
and  bedload  and  can  cause  scouring  and  erosion 
of  stream  banks.  The  amount  that  vegetation  re- 
moval affects  the  peak  flow  rate  is  directly  correla- 
tive with  the  percent  of  a drainage  that  is  harvested. 

Indices:  The  indices  of  measurement  to  determine 
effects  to  water  quality  and  volume  are:  1)  percent 
of  drainages  harvested;  2)  state  water  quality  stand- 
ards are  met;  3)  beneficial  uses  are  maintained;  and 
4)  predicted  change  in  water  yield. 


WETLANDS 

How  will  the  proposed  timber  harvest  affect  wet- 
lands? WSS8  timber  harvest  occur  In  wetlands? 

The  effects  of  the  proposed  timber  sale  on  wet- 
lands, particularly  as  they  relate  to  water  quality, 
was  a concern  expressed  by  some  respondents 
during  the  scoping  process.  Wetlands  serve  an  im- 
portant role  in  maintaining  water  quality  by  acting  as 
a filter  to  catch  sediment  or  other  impurities  in  sur- 
face water.  Removal  of  vegetation  or  construction  of 
roads  or  skid  trails  in  wetlands  would  impair  this 
function.  Forest  Service  policy  dictates  that  no  tim- 


I - 13 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sate  Draft  ESS 


Chapter  i 


ber  harvest  or  road  construction  will  occur  in  wet- 
land areas,  but  they  must  be  identified  before  they 
can  be  avoided. 

Indices:  The  index  of  measurement  to  determine 
effects  to  wetlands  is  the  acres  of  wetlands  that  are 
affected. 


FISHERIES 

How  wSIB  road  construction  and  timber  harvesting 
affect  spawning,  incubation,  and  rearing  habitats 
of  anadromous  and  resident  fish? 

Resident  and  anadromous  fisheries  within  and  be- 
low the  proposed  sale  areas  are  of  great  concern  to 
the  public  and  government  agencies,  including  the 
National  Marine  Fisheries  Service  and  the  Columbia 
River  Inter-Tribal  Fish  Commission.  The  spring- 
summer  run  of  Chinook  salmon  has  recently  been 
listed  as  Threatened  under  the  Endangered 
Species  Act,  and  habitat  for  this  fish  species  is 
present  in  the  analysis  area,  although  it  is  not  cur- 
rently being  used.  Effects  to  this  habitat  as  a result 
of  the  proposed  timber  sale  are  therefore  a concern. 

The  fisheries  issues  are  closely  tied  to  soil  and  water 
issues.  Increases  in  the  natural  sedimentation  rate 
due  to  soil  disruption  associated  with  timber  har- 
vest, particularly  road  construction  activities,  may 
affect  fish  habitat  for  both  anadromous  and  resident 
fish  species.  Increases  in  sedimentation  may  cause 
fine  sediment  to  be  deposited  in  spawning  gravels 
and  impede  fry  emergence.  Disruption  of  the  bed- 
load due  to  increased  peak  flow  rates  can  also  af- 
fect spawning  gravels. 

Indices:  The  index  of  measurement  for  effects  to 
fisheries  is  whether  anadromous  and  resident  fish- 
eries habitat  are  maintained. 


BIOLOGICAL  DIVERSITY 

The  general  concern  is  that  some  species  are  going 
extinct  at  an  alarming  and  un-natural  rate.  Loss  of 
habitat  (loss  of  ecosystems  and  fragmented  non- 
functional landscapes)  is  the  number  one  reason  for 
extinction  of  species.  Management  activities  may 
change  landscape  (and  ecosystems)  structure  and 


function  beyond  the  range  of  natural  variation  and 
result  in  decreasing  biological  diversity. 

The  effects  to  biological  diversity  are  discussed  in 
the  wildlife,  vegetation,  and  Threatened  and  Endan- 
gered, and  Sensitive  Species  sections  in  Chapter 
IV,  as  well  as  a separate  section  called  biological 
diversity.  Additional  information  on  biological  diver- 
sity can  be  found  in  Appendix  H. 


THREATENED,  ENDANGERED  AND  SENSITIVE 
SPECIES 

Effects  to  federally  listed  Threatened,  Endangered 
and  Proposed  species  and  to  the  Forest  Service’s 
Intermountain  (R4)  Regional  Office’s  Sensitive 
species  is  a concern  for  maintenance  of  both  bio- 
logical diversity  and  the  wildlife  resources  of  the 
area. 

Habitat  for  listed  threatened  spring/summer  chi- 
nook  is  present  in  Moyer  Creek  and  potential  habitat 
is  present  in  Woodtick  Creek,  although  neither  is 
used  at  present  by  this  species  because  of  down- 
stream water  pollution.  In  addition,  an  existing  cul- 
vert presents  a barrier  to  migration  of  steelhead 
through  the  middle  reaches  of  Woodtick  Creek. 
Sedimentation  from  project  activities  can  reduce 
these  stream’s  fish  habitat  capability,  and  road 
crossing  of  these  creeks  could  create  migration  bar- 
riers. 

Potential  habitat  for  the  Endangered  gray  wolf  exists 
in  the  area  and  the  entire  analysis  area  is  within  the 
Central  Idaho  Wolf  Recovery  Area.  However,  no 
wolves  are  known  or  suspected  to  occupy  the  area 
at  this  time  and  no  observational  reports  have  been 
received  from  this  area. 

Prey  populations,  especially  elk,  are  currently  ade- 
quate to  support  pack  activity  on  the  Cobalt  Ranger 
District,  including  this  specific  area.  However,  the 
entire  Panther  Creek  drainage,  including  the  Moyer 
Creek  tributary,  has  been  permanently  altered  by 
roads  and  yearlong  human  presence  and  habita- 
tion. 

Several  Sensitive  vertebrate  species  or  their  habitat 
are  present  in  the  analysis  area,  including:  North 
American  lynx,  wolverine,  northern  three-toed 


I - 14 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Chapter  i 


woodpecker,  great  gray  owl,  western  big-eared  bat, 
boreal  owl,  northern  goshawk,  and  spotted  frog. 
Manipulation  of  the  vegetation  in  the  area  could 
result  in  modification  or  destruction  of  these 
species’  habitat.  Sensitive  plant  species  could  also 
be  affected  by  vegetation  manipulation  and  road 
construction,  however,  none  are  known  to  occur 
here. 

Indices:  The  indices  of  measurement  of  effects  to 
these  species  are:  1)  presence  of  Threatened,  En- 
dangered or  Proposed  species  and/or  their  habitat; 
2)  presence  of  Forest  Service,  Intermountain  Re- 
gional Office  Sensitive  species  and/or  their  habitats; 
and  3)  effects  to  potential  and/or  occupied  habitat 
for  both  1 and  2 above. 


VISUAL  RESOURCES 

How  will  visual  quality  be  affected  as  seen  from 
within  and  outside  the  analysis  area? 

Road  building  and  timber  harvesting  can  change 
the  visual  appearance  of  an  area  as  seen  from  trails, 
roads,  and  other  locations.  Portions  of  the  analysis 
area  that  will  be  affected  by  these  activities  can  be 
seen  from  the  Moyer  Creek  Road  and  the  Ridge 
Road. 

Indices:  The  index  of  measurement  of  effects  to 
visual  resources  is:  1)  whether  the  visual  quality 
objectives  are  met;  and  2)  the  number  of  units  not 
meeting  VQO. 

RECREATION 

How  wile  the  recreation  setting  and  opportunities 
be  changed?  How  will  recreation  use  change? 

Current  recreation  use  in  the  analysis  area  is  primar- 
ily related  to  big  game  hunting  in  the  fall.  Access  to 
the  area  is  limited  , and  recreation  use  is  light.  The 
quality  of  the  current  recreation  uses  and  the  kinds 
of  recreation  opportunities  would  change  as  a result 
of  the  proposed  timber  harvest  activities,  and  how 
that  would  affect  the  amount  and  types  of  recreation 
use  is  a concern. 

Indices:  The  index  of  measurement  of  effects  to 
recreation  use  is  the  number  of  acres  converted 


from  semi-primitive  motorized  and  non-motorized  to 
roaded-natural  appearing. 

AIR  QUALITY 

How  will  the  proposed  timber  harvest  activities 
affect  the  air  quality  of  the  analysis  area? 

This  issue  looks  at  how  the  proposed  project  activi- 
ties would  affect  the  air  quality  in  the  area  and  if 
stated  air  quality  standards  will  be  met. 

Timber  harvest  activities  increase  the  amount  of 
dust  in  the  air  in  the  vicinity  of  the  project  area  and 
during  project  implementation  due  to  construction 
and  use  of  roads.  Slash  burning  will  degrade  air 
quality  in  the  analysis  area  and  downwind  of  it,  and 
may  affect  persons  travelling  on  the  Ridge  Road 
and  other  roads  in  the  area.  Smoke  due  to  slash 
burning  may  be  visible  for  several  miles,  depending 
on  weather  conditions  and  dispersion  patterns. 

Indices:  The  indices  of  measurement  for  air  quality 
are  whether  the  State  air  quality  standards  are  ex- 
ceeded. 


TRANSPORTATION  AND  ACCESS 

How  will  the  construction  of  the  proposed  trans- 
portation system  affect  future  use  of  the  timber 
resource  in  the  area?  How  will  access  to  the  area 
be  changed? 

The  development  of  a transportation  system  that 
allows  use  of  Forest  resources  is  an  issue  in  the 
Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  area.  Road  access  to  the 
analysis  area  is  currently  limited,  and  the  timber 
resource  in  the  area  cannot  be  utilized.  Construc- 
tion of  new  roads  will  not  only  provide  access  to  the 
timber  proposed  for  harvesting  under  the  action 
alternatives  but  will  also  affect  future  access  to  other 
timber  resources  in  the  area. 

Also  at  issue  is  how  access  to  the  sale  areas  for 
recreational  use  would  change  under  the  alterna- 
tives. Existing  timber  roads  in  the  Salt  Creek  portion 
of  the  timber  sale  are  gated  and  closed  to  motorized 
use  to  protect  big  game  habitat.  All  new  roads  con- 
structed for  access  to  the  timber  sale  area  would 
also  be  gated  and  closed.  In  addition,  a portion  of 


I - 15 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Chapter  I 


Roads  60286.1,  60286-C,  and  60288  will  have  con- 
struction slash  placed  oh  the  roads,  after  timber 
removal,  for  the  purpose  of  impeding  foot  and  horse 
traffic  on  the  new  road  system.  This  mitigation  mea- 
sure will  only  be  installed  on  roads  which  may  be 
readily  accessed  by  the  Moyer  Peak  Jeep  Trail 
which  will  remain  open. 

Indices:  Indices  for  measurement  of  the  effects  of 
the  different  transportation  systems  proposed  for 
the  alternatives  are  1)  the  number  of  acres  available 
for  timber  harvesting  with  the  existing  road  system: 
2)  the  number  of  acres  available  for  timber  harvest- 
ing with  the  proposed  road  systems;  3)  the  miles  of 
road  that  would  be  constructed  or  reconstructed: 
and  4)  miles  of  open  road  and  closed  road  in  the 
analysis  area. 

MINERALS 

How  wSIS  the  mineral  resources  of  the  analysis 
area  be  affected? 

This  issue  looks  at  how  the  proposed  timber  harvest 
activities  would  affect  potential  mineral  develop- 
ment in  the  analysis  area.  Increased  access  into  the 
area  could  cause  an  increase  in  mineral  exploration 
activity  in  the  area,  and  more  exposure  of  bedrock 
would  occur  in  roads  cuts  and  surfaces.  However, 
mineral  development  may  be  limited  as  a result  of 
the  proposed  activities  because  wildlife,  water  qual- 
ity and  other  resource  standards  and  guidelines  in 
the  Forest  Plan  may  limit  the  number  of  acres  of 
road  or  other  surface  disturbance  that  can  occur  in 
an  area. 


indices:  The  index  of  measurement  for  effects  to 
mineral  resources  is  whether  the  proposed  activities 
would  interfere  with  potential  mineral  development. 


CULTURAL  RESOURCES 

How  will  the  cultural!  resources  of  the  analysis 

area  be  affected? 

Concern  has  been  expressed  that  the  proposed 
activities  may  impact  cultural  resources  in  the  analy- 
sis area.  Road  construction  could  damage  cultural 
resource  sites  or  could  provide  better  access  to  the 
site  and  may  result  in  an  increase  in  vandalism. 

Indices:  The  index  of  measurement  of  effects  to 
cultural  resources  is  whether  or  not  impacts  will 
occur. 

RANGE  RESOURCES 

What  would  be  the  effect  of  the  proposed  timber 
harvest  on  range  resources? 

Timber  harvest  can  increase  grazing  by  improving 
access  and  increasing  forage  or  reduce  livestock  by 
fencing  livestock  out  of  areas.  These  changes  can 
alter  grazing  levels,  livestock  use  patterns,  and 
rangeland  conditions. 

Indices:  The  index  of  measurement  for  range  re- 
sources is  the  effects  on  range  condition. 


I - 16 


Chapter  IE 

Alternatives 


Changes  Between  the  Draft  and 


Final 

SI-1 

Alternative  Development 
Alternatives  Considered  But 

11-1 

Not  Given  Detailed  Study 
Alternatives  Considered  In 

Si-1 

Detail 

SS-3 

Alternative  1 - No  Action 

11-7 

Alternative  2 

Si-® 

Alternative  3 

11-13 

Alternative  4 

11-17 

Alternative  5 

11-21 

Alternative  6 

8S-25 

Alternative  2A 

99-29 

Management  and  Mitigation 

18-31 

Monitoring 

SI-38 

Comparison  of  Alternatives 

11-41 

Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  II 


CHAPTER  IS 

ALTERNATIVES,  INCLUDING  THE  PROPOSED  ACTION 


CHANGES  BETWEEN  THE  DRAFT  AND  FINAL 

There  are  a number  of  changes  in  Chapter  II  be- 
tween the  Draft  Environmental  Impact  Statement 
(DEIS)  and  the  Final  Environmental  Impact  State- 
ment (FEIS).  These  changes  were  made  in  re- 
sponse to  public  comment  on  the  Draft  EIS  and 
further  analysis  by  the  Interdisciplinary  Team  (ID 
Team),  a group  of  specialists  representing  various 
resources  and  uses  of  the  Forest,  such  as  timber, 
wildlife,  recreation,  visuals,  fisheries,  soils,  and  wa- 
ter. 

Three  new  alternatives  have  been  developed  (Alter- 
natives 5,  6,  and  2A)  and  studied  in  detail,  along 
with  four  additional  alternatives  given  consideration 
but  not  detailed  study. 

Alternative  5 was  developed  in  response  to  com- 
ments received  on  the  DEIS.  It  is  intended  to  re- 
spond to  requests  that  "a  no  roads  access  for  timber 
harvest*  be  considered  and  that  an  alternative  be 
considered  that  ‘addresses  harvesting  less  than  3.0 
MMBF  and  constructing  less  than  10  miles  of  road. 

Alternative  6 was  developed  in  order  to  provide  a 
balance  between  concerns  for  visual  quality  and 
insect  and  disease  conditions. 

Alternative  2A  was  developed  to  respond  to  con- 
cerns about  visual  quality.  It  is  designed  to  mitigate 
the  visual  effects  of  timber  harvest  when  viewed 
from  a landscape  or  background  view. 

CHAPTER  REVIEW 

A total  of  seven  alternatives  are  considered  in  detail: 
a no  action  alternative  plus  six  action  alternatives. 
Each  action  alternative  wholly  or  partially  meets  the 
purpose  of  and  need  for  action  while  addressing  the 
issues  identified  in  Chapter  I.  This  chapter  contains 
sections  on:  (1)  Alternative  Development  Process, 
(2)  Alternatives  Considered  but  not  Given  Detailed 


Study,  (3)  Alternatives  Considered  in  Detail,  (4) 
Management,  Mitigation,  and  Monitoring  Measures, 
and  (5)  Comparison  of  Alternatives.  This  informa- 
tion, along  with  the  Chapter  IV  disclosure  of  project- 
ed environmental  consequences  of  each 
alternative,  provides  information  allowing  the 
decision-maker  to  make  a reasoned  choice  be- 
tween alternatives. 


ALTERNATIVE  DEVELOPMENT  PROCESS 

The  ID  Team  considered  the  following  important 

elements  when  they  developed  the  alternatives  for 

this  analysis: 

* The  goals,  objectives,  and  desired  future  con- 
dition for  the  analysis  area  as  outlined  in  the 
Forest  Plan; 

* The  analysis  for  the  1 983  Moyer  Salt  Timber 
Sale  Environmental  Assessment  (EA)  (see  de- 
scription under  "Alternatives  Considered  But 
Not  Given  Detailed  Study"); 

* Comments  made  by  the  public  and  other 
agencies  during  scoping;  and 

* The  laws,  regulations,  and  policies  that  govern 
management  of  the  national  forests. 


ALTERNATIVES  CONSIDERED 
BUT  NOT  GIVEN  DETAILED  STUDY 

The  ID  Team  considered  the  following  alternatives 
and  options  during  the  analysis  process,  but  they 
eliminated  them  from  detailed  study  for  the  reasons 
described  below: 


* Use  the  preferred  alternative  Identified  In 
the  Moyer  Salt  Environmental  Assessment 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EfiS 


Chapter  89 


(1 983)  as  the  proposed  action  for  this  Draft 
EIS. 

in  1 982  the  Forest  Service  proposed  timber  harvest- 
ing and  road  construction  in  the  Woodtick  Creek 
and  Sait  Creek  drainages  (the  Moyer  Salt  Timber 
Sale)  that  would  harvest  4 to  8 mmbf  from  1 ,000  to 
1,400  acres.  An  Environmental  Assessment  (EA) 
was  approved  that  documented  an  environmental 
evaluation  of  the  proposed  timber  harvesting  and 
road  construction  with  a reasonable  range  of  man- 
agement action  alternatives  (U.S.  Forest  Service 
1982).  This  evaluation  did  not  assess  the  effects  of 
the  proposed  action  on  the  roadless  character  of 
the  area.  A Finding  of  No  Significant  Impact  (FONSI) 
and  Decision  Notice  were  signed  by  the  Forest  Su- 
pervisor in  May,  1 983.  The  timber  sale  was  marked 
and  offered  for  sale  but  was  not  purchased  due  to 
depressed  timber  prices  in  the  mid-1980s.  In  1988 
the  Forest  Plan  was  approved;  it  designated  the 
Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  area  as  an  area  where  tim- 
ber harvesting  could  occur.  In  1991  the  decision 
was  made  to  enter  the  area  for  timber  harvesting. 
The  timber  harvesting  and  road  construction  activi- 
ties proposed  in  the  original  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale 
were  modified  to  meet  the  current  standards  and 
guidelines  of  the  Forest  Plan,  and  are  contained  in 
the  proposed  alternative  (Alternative  11  in  this  docu- 
ment). 


* Complete  a separate  EIS  analysis  for  each 
of  two  timber  sales  originally  proposed  In 
the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  ESS  analysis 
area. 

As  originally  stated  in  the  1988  Forest  Plan,  two 
separate  timber  sales  were  proposed  for  what  is 
now  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale:  the  Moyer-Salt 
Timber  Sale  and  the  Salt  Creek  Timber  Sale.  These 
two  timber  sales  were  combined  into  a single  sale, 
primarily  to  facilitate  control  of  timing  of  road  con- 
struction and  timber  harvesting  in  big  game  subdivi- 
sions. The  two  timber  sales  were  not  offered  and 
their  effects  were  not  analyzed  separately  because: 
1)  this  approach  would  not  yield  a clear  disclosure 
of  the  potential  environmental  effects  from  the  pro- 
posed action;  2)  it  would  not  be  cost  efficient;  and 
3)  roads  built  to  access  the  Salt  Creek  portion  of  the 
timber  sale  would  also  access  the  Moyer  Salt  por- 
tion; therefore,  analyzing  the  effects  of  the  two  sales 
separately  would  be  partially  redundant  and  an  inef- 
ficient use  of  time  and  resources. 


* Harvest  timber  only  outside  the  Taylor 
Mountain  Roadless  Area. 

Comments  to  the  DEIS  suggested  that  we  analyze 
this  alternative.  Our  reason  for  dismissing  further 
analysis  follows.  Nearly  50%  of  the  Salmon  National 
Forest’s  suitable  timber  base  is  located  in  roadless 
areas.  The  Forest  Plan  identified  roadless  lands 
within  this  analysis  area  as  suitable  for  timber  har- 
vest. Failure  to  consider  harvesting  in  roadless  ar- 
eas would  lead  to  overcutting  of  nonroadless  lands 
based  on  the  current  Allowable  Sale  Quantity.  One 
of  the  purposes  of  this  EIS  is  to  address  the  effects 
of  timber  harvest  activities  on  the  roadless  resource, 
thus  this  alternative  would  be  outside  the  scope  of 
this  document.  The  No  Action  alternative  approxi- 
mates this  alternative  and  if  selected  would  allow 
the  option  to  consider  any  number  of  timber  sales 
outside  the  roadless  area. 


* Prescribed  burn  alternative  t©  address  the 
forest  health  concerns. 

Due  to  public  comments  received  after  release  of 
the  DEIS,  a prescribed  burn  alternative  was  consid- 
ered but  is  outside  the  scope  of  this  EIS  because  it 
does  not  meet  the  purpose  of  contributing,  in  part, 
to  the  Forest  Plan  objective  of  satisfying  the  com- 
mercial demand  for  timber.  The  Draft  EIS,  on  page 
1-1  states:  The  proposed  action  alternatives  are 
designed  to  help  provide  a continuous  flow  of  raw 
materials  to  dependent  manufacturing  communities 
and  thereby  provide  community  stability.  It  is  also 
designed  to  enable  the  public  to  gather  firewood.  All 
the  proposed  action  alternatives  are  consistent  with 
maintaining  the  customs  and  cultures  of  these  com- 
munities.' 


* Helicopter  log  1 70  acres  of  Douglas-fSr  units 

and  conventionally  log  580  acres,  requiring 
1 5.8  miles  of  road  (2.5  miles  Bn  Wildlife  Area 
8 and  13.3  mlies  In  II)  with  an  estimated  yield 
©f  6.0  MMBF. 

Due  to  public  comments  received  after  release  of 
the  DEIS,  this  alternative  was  considered  but 
dropped  from  further  analysis  due  to  the  increased 
costs  of  logging  and  transportation,  and  the  rela- 
tively minor  benefits  to  wildlife. 


11-2 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  II 


* Helicopter  logging  the  Douglas-flr  units 
(170  acres)  and  conventionally  log  170 
acres,  requiring  1 3.8  miles  of  road  (only  0.5 
miles  of  road  in  Wildlife  area  9 to  access 
hell-spot  and  all  conventional  units  dropped 
In  this  area)  with  an  estimated  yield  of  4.0 
MMBF. 

This  alternative  like  the  previous  one,  was  consid- 
ered because  of  public  comments  received  after 
release  of  the  DEIS,  but  was  dropped  from  further 
analysis  due  to  the  increased  costs  of  logging  and 
transportation,  and  the  relatively  minor  benefits  to 
wildlife. 


ALTERNATIVES  CONSIDERED 
IN  DETAIL 

Seven  alternatives  were  developed  and  analyzed  in 
detail,  a no-action  alternative  and  six  action  alterna- 
tives. Each  action  alternative  represents  a different 
combination  of  timber  harvest  and  road  building 
intensity,  as  well  as  slightly  different  methods  for 
mitigating  their  effects.  These  alternatives  were  de- 
signed to  meet  the  issues  and  concerns  identified 
during  scoping  while  at  least  partially  meeting  the 
purpose  of  and  need  for  action  defined  in  Chapter 
I,  and  represent  a reasonable  range  of  actions  to 
accomplish  those  goals.  The  seven  alternatives  are 
described  in  the  following  pages,  and  the  locations 
of  cutting  units  and  roads  are  shown  on  the  accom- 
panying maps. 

The  Forest  Plan  standards  and  guidelines  that 
would  be  used  during  implementation  of  any  of  the 
action  alternatives  are  designed  to  guide  implemen- 
tation of  Forest  management  goals,  such  as  timber 
management,  while  protecting  other  important  re- 
source values. 

Harvest  treatments  prescribed  for  the  proposed 
Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  apply  even-aged  silvicultur- 
al systems  because  these  methods  best  meet  the 
Management  Area  goals  for  the  area  established  in 
the  Forest  Plan  (pp.  IV-32).  Standard  harvest  meth- 
ods for  even-aged  management  of  forests  include 
clearcutting,  seed  tree,  and  shelterwood  methods. 
Clearcutting  and  shelterwood  or  variations  of  the 
shelterwood  systems  including  diversified  forests 
methods  are  the  optimum  even-aged  silvicultural 
methods  for  treating  stand  conditions  in  the  Moyer 
Salt  analysis  area. 


Clearcut  Harvest 

Standard  clearcutting  would  be  applied  in  areas 
with  heavy  fuel  loadings,  where  residual  overstory 
or  understory  trees  can’t  be  protected  while  har- 
vesting, in  areas  susceptible  to  windthrow,  and  in 
stands  infected  with  dwarf  mistletoe.  These  condi- 
tions are  found  on  subalpine  fir  habitat  types  con- 
sisting of  relatively  pure  stands  of  lodgepole  pine  or 
mixed  stands  of  lodgepole  pine,  subalpine  fir,  and 
Engelmann  spruce.  Even  when  it  is  possible  to  skid 
logs  and  save  a residual  stand,  it  is  often  not  possi- 
ble to  dispose  of  the  slash  without  clearcutting. 
However,  wherever  feasible,  healthy  residual  under- 
story trees  will  be  left.  This  method  would  be  utilized 
in  Alternatives  2,  3,  4,  and  5. 

Alternatives  6 and  2A  would  utilize  clearcutting  with 
islands  in  order  to  meet  visual  quality  objectives  and 
mitigate  other  resource  concerns.  Where  clearcut- 
ting is  prescribed,  many  of  the  stands  would  have 
approximately  1 5%  of  the  area  within  the  unit  left  in 
uncut  islands  ranging  from  1/2  an  acre  to  one  acre 
in  size.  With  heavy  fuel  loadings,  such  as  those 
found  in  the  analysis  area,  the  retention  of  islands  is 
the  only  practical  and  economically  feasible  alterna- 
tive to  standard  clearcutting. 

Regardless  of  which  method  is  applied,  there  would 
be  a variety  of  common  treatments.  Most  units 
would  be  logged  using  tractor  skidding  methods; 
units  with  slopes  too  steep  for  tractor  logging  would 
be  logged  with  a cable  system. 

After  the  trees  have  been  removed  from  a site,  a 
variety  of  activities  would  occur  on  the  site  that  are 
designed  to  promote  seedling  establishment,  im- 
prove timber  stand  conditions  and  reduce  the 
amount  of  combustible  material  laying  on  the 
ground  (fuel  loading).  Slash  would  be  piled  by  trac- 
tors on  sites  with  slopes  less  than  45  percent.  In 
addition,  ten  to  fifteen  tons  of  slash  would  be  left 
evenly  scattered  on  each  acre  in  order  to  provide 
microsites  that  enhance  seedling  establishment 
and  survival,  ensure  long-term  soil  productivity  and 
provide  habitat  for  insects  and  animals.  Any  remain- 
ing unhealthy  trees  and  insect-infected  understory 
trees  that  were  not  pushed  over  during  the  piling 
process  would  be  hand  felled  in  order  to  increase 
growing  space  and  completely  remove  any  disease 
source.  All  remaining  healthy  understory  trees 
would  be  maintained.  Existing  snags  (large  stand- 
ing dead  trees)  and  recruitment  snags  (trees  that 


II  -3 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  II 


would  be  retained  as  future  snags  trees)  would  be 
maintained  as  per  Forest  Plan  direction. 

During  logging,  branches,  tree  tops,  and  small  trees 
(slash)  would  be  cut  to  lengths  such  that  the  slash 
would  lie  on  the  ground  at  depths  of  less  than  1 .5 
feet.  In  some  areas,  this  material  would  be  made 
available  to  the  public  and  commercial  firewood 
gatherers  for  a designated  time  period  after  logging 
operations  are  complete.  After  firewood  gathering, 
the  slash  would  be  burned  to  increase  available 
growing  space,  to  reduce  the  amount  of  dead  mate- 
ria! on  the  ground  and  thereby  to  reduce  potential 
for  wildfires,  and  to  assist  in  the  breakdown  of 
woody  material  and  increase  soil  productivity. 
Clearcut  units  on  slopes  steeper  than  45  percent 
would  be  broadcast  burned  (burned  without  piling); 
on  slopes  less  than  45  percent  the  slash  would  be 
burned  in  piles.  Firelines  would  be  constructed 
around  harvest  units  to  reduce  the  possibilities  of 
fire  escape  during  burning.  Burning  would  be  con- 
trolled so  that  1 0 to  1 5 tons  per  acre  of  slash  materi- 
al, including  larger  diameter  pieces  of  slash,  would 
be  retained  to  provide  microsite  protection,  ensure 
soil  productivity  and  maintain  habitat  for  those  or- 
ganisms requiring  down  woody  debris. 

Natural  seed  sprouting  would  reforest  the  clearcut 
units.  Natural  seeding  and  regeneration  of  timber 
harvest  cutting  units  on  similar  sites  elsewhere  in 
the  Salmon  National  Forest  has  been  successful. 
Clearcuts  would  be  planted  if  reforestation  by  natu- 
ral means  is  not  successful.  Timing  of  harvesting 
and  slash  disposal  would  be  adjusted  to  ensure  that 
the  pine  cones  have  dropped  their  seeds  before  the 
slash  is  piled. 

Machine  site  preparation  such  as  scarification 
would  be  used  in  units  where  grasses,  sedges,  or 
shrubs  are  present  that  may  prevent  or  prolong 
seedling  establishment.  On  approximately  50  to  1 00 
acres  of  clearcutting  units,  a specially  designed 
tractor  blade  will  be  used  to  overturn  the  sod  layer 
and  to  loosen  the  top  soil  of  an  area  in  order  to 
create  a mineral  soil  seedbed  where  tree  seeds  can 
germinate. 

Shefterwood  Harvest 

In  stands  where  there  are  no  young  trees  present  on 
the  site  or  where  those  that  are  present  are  un- 
healthy (they  are  infested  with  insects  and  diseases 
or  will  not  grow  if  the  competing  trees  are  removed), 
a standard  shefterwood  method  would  be  uniformly 


implemented  (designated  as  “shelterwood"  on  Alter- 
native maps).  The  initial  entry  would  apply  the  seed 
cut  of  the  shelterwood  in  which  approximately  fifty  to 
seventy  percent  of  the  overstory  depending  on  site 
conditions.  The  remaining  “leave  trees*  would  be 
expected  to  regenerate  the  site  within  1 0-1 5 years. 
The  actual  time  necessary  to  regenerate  these  sites 
would  vary  depending  upon  whether  the  topogra- 
phy was  suitable  for  the  application  of  machine 
scarification.  Once  regeneration  is  established,  a 
removal  cut  of  the  shelter  wood  would  be  made 
leaving  three  to  five  large  trees  per  acre  for  snag 
replacement  or  future  harvest. 

In  stands  where  there  are  healthy  young  trees  on 
the  site  that  will  grow  if  competing  trees  are  re- 
moved, a group  shelterwood  method  would  be  im- 
plemented (designated  as  group  shelterwood  on 
maps).  Stands  where  this  method  is  proposed  are 
characterized  by  three  distinct  components: 

1 . A Douglas-fir  overstory  with  an  understory  of 
Douglas-fir  seedlings  and  saplings  ranging 
from  two  to  six  feet  tall; 

2.  A Douglas-fir  overstory  with  an  occasional 
clump  of  regeneration  but  generally  park  like 
in  appearance; 

3.  Thick  patches  of  advanced  Douglas-fir  re- 
generation (pole  size  materia!  3.0  - 8.9  inches 
DBH). 

These  three  components  create  a mosaic  of  even- 
aged  groups.  The  objective  of  the  group  shelter- 
wood  method  is  to  maintain  these  components  as 
even-aged  groups,  thereby  replicating  nature’s  re- 
production system.  In  the  initial  entry,  this  method 
takes  advantage  of  the  existing  regeneration 
present.  Where  a suitable  understory  is  present,  a 
removal  cut  of  the  shelterwood  would  be  performed 
to  release  existing  regeneration.  Where  regenera- 
tion is  lacking,  the  seed  cut  of  a shelterwood  would 
be  implemented  removing  approximately  50  to  70 
percent  of  the  overstory  depending  on  site  condi- 
tions. Where  existing  patches  of  Douglas-fir  regen- 
eration is  encountered  a combination  of  precom- 
mercial and  commercial  thinning  would  be  applied. 

In  order  to  meet  visual  quality  objectives  and  miti- 
gate other  resource  concerns,  many  of  the  units  in 
Alternatives  5,  6 and  2A  will  be  treated  utilizing  a 
modified  irregular  shelterwood  system  (designated 
“irregular  shelterwood"  on  the  Alternative  maps). 
This  method  would  be  initially  similar  to  the  stand- 
ard and  group  shelterwood  methods  described  for 


11-4 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  II 


Alternatives  2, 3 and  4.  The  primary  difference  is  that 
the  shelterwood  trees  are  retained  longer  than  nec- 
essary for  seedling  establishment  thus  delaying  the 
timing  of  the  second  entry  into  the  stand.  The  re- 
moval cut  (second  entry)  of  the  shelterwood,  would 
not  be  performed  until  the  average  height  of  the 
regeneration  is  approximately  20  feet.  The  removal 
cut  would  therefore  occur  approximately  20  to  30 
years  after  the  seed  cut  as  compared  to  1 0 to  15 
years  when  employing  the  standard  or  group  shel- 
terwood. 

Regardless  of  which  method  is  applied  there  would 
be  a variety  of  common  treatments.  Most  units 
would  be  logged  using  tractor  skidding  methods. 
Units  with  slopes  greater  than  45  percent  would  be 
logged  using  a cable  system. 

Machine  scarification  and  slash  piling  by  dozer 
would  be  performed  as  one  operation  in  areas 
where  a shelterwood  seed  cut  is  made.  Fifty  percent 
of  these  areas  would  be  scarified  by  alternating 
strips  of  treated  and  untreated  ground.  Slash  would 
be  lopped  and  scattered  prior  to  the  scarification 
process.  It  would  be  evenly  redistributed  during  the 
scarification  process.  These  treatments  would  not 
be  possible  under  Alternative  5 due  to  lack  of  road 
access.  In  cable  units  that  are  too  steep  to  pile  or 
scarify,  the  slash  would  be  lopped  and  scattered  or 
jackpot  burned  (areas  where  slash  has  accumulat- 
ed in  piles  (jackpots)  would  be  burned).  In  areas 
where  a removal  cut,  slash  would  be  lopped  and 
scattered.  No  piling  or  burning  would  occur  in  order 
to  protect  healthy  trees  present  on  the  site. 

Young  trees  left  in  shelterwood  units  would  be 
thinned  (a  cutting  is  made  in  the  overstocked 
stands  to  bring  stocking  to  the  desired  level  and  to 
increase  growth  in  remaining  trees).  Trees  that  are 


damaged  or  unhealthy  would  be  cut  down  by  hand 
in  order  to  provide  growing  space  for  new  trees. 


ROAD  CONSTRUCTION  AND 
RECONSTRUCTION  STANDARDS 
AND  GUIDELINES 

Timber  access  roads  in  the  analysis  area  would  be 
built  to  Forest  Service  standards  and  guidelines. 
These  road  specifications  are  designed  to  ensure 
that  these  roads  fit  the  topography  and  appearance 
of  the  land;  are  stable;  do  not  erode  or  result  in 
increased  stream  sedimentation;  and  could  be 
used  again  for  the  next  timber  harvest  entry.  A de- 
scription of  road  construction  and  reconstruction 
methods  and  specifications  is  contained  in  the 
Project  File. 

Both  specified  (roads  designed  by  engineers  as 
permanent  roads)  and  temporary  roads  would  be 
constructed  as  part  of  the  timber  sale  (contained  in 
Project  File).  The  design  and  specifications  for  the- 
se roads  are  contained  in  the  timber  sale  contract; 
the  engineering  administrator  is  responsible  for  en- 
suring that  these  specifications  are  met  by  the 
timber  sale  purchaser. 

Under  Alternatives  3,  4,  5,  and  6,  the  first  nine  miles 
of  existing  Forest  Service  Road  107  in  the  lower 
Woodtick  Creek  area  would  be  reconstructed  so 
that  it  meets  the  same  Forest  specifications  as 
newly  constructed  roads  used  for  hauling  logs.  Un- 
der all  of  the  action  alternatives,  a short  segment  of 
existing  Forest  Service  Road  106  would  also  be 
reconstructed.  Where  existing  drainage  structures 
such  as  culverts,  ditches,  and  dips  are  not  perform- 
ing adequately,  these  structures  would  be  rebuilt 
before  the  roads  would  be  used  for  hauling  logs. 
Additional  water  dips  would  also  be  constructed  to 
prevent  extensive  rutting. 


T19 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  SB 


ALTERNATIVE  1 - NO  ACTION 

The  No  Action  alternative  would  not  initiate  any  activities;  present  resource  management  activities  would 
continue,  but  the  proposed  project  activities  would  not  be  implemented. 

The  goal  of  this  alternative  is  to  maintain  the  area’s  undeveloped  condition  and  current  uses  (see  Figure  11-1). 
This  alternative  provides  a baseline  to  compare  the  effects  of  the  action  alternatives,  and  responds  to  the 
roadless  issue,  or  the  desire  to  maintain  the  area  in  a roadless  condition.  Because  the  existing  environment 
is  not  static,  environmental  consequences  will  still  occur;  natural  events  such  as  wildfire,  insect  and  disease 
infestations,  or  flooding  could  appreciably  alter  most  of  the  resources  that  are  discussed  in  this  document. 

Total  area  that  would  be  treated  (acres) 

0 

Total  volume  that  would  be  harvested  (mrnbf) 

0 

Miles  of  road  that  would  be  built  (miles) 

0 

Number  of  cutting  units: 

Douglas-fir 

0 

Lodgepole  pine  or  mixed  lodgepole  pine, 
subalpine  fir  and  Engelmann  spruce 

0 

Clearcut  Cutting  Method: 

Amount  clearcut  (acres) 
Logging  Methods: 

0 

tractor  (acres) 

0 

cable  (acres) 
Slash  Disposal  Method: 

0 

piled  and  burned  (acres) 

0 

broadcast  burned  (acres) 

0 

Machine  Scarification  (acres) 

0 

Shelterwood  Cutting  Method: 

0 

Amount  Shelterwood  (acres) 

0 

Logging  Methods:  tractor  (acres) 

0 

cable  (acres) 

Slash  Disposal  Method: 

piled  and  burned  (acres) 
broadcast  burned  (acres) 

0 

Machine  Scarification  (acres) 

0 

II  - 7 


( $0 a A l-T*[f&Heli\>ort 


14 


18 


2 4^ 


**t° 

1 9” 


l°o 


grove 


BM 

*65399a 


>na' 


fr- 


FlA 


3.6 


Unit 

Number 

Major 

Species 

Acres 

Harvest  Method 

Yarding  Method 

Habitat  Type 

7 

(LP.AF.ES.DF) 

48 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

8 

(LP.AF.ES.  DF) 

12 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc/Alsi 

9 

(LP.AF.ES.DF) 

33 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc/Alsi 

10 

(DF.LP.AF.DF) 

34 

Shelterwood 

Tractor 

Alba-Caru/Vasc 

11 

(LP.AF.ES) 

20 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

13 

(LP.AF.ES) 

36 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

19 

(LRAF) 

16 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

19A 

(LP.AF) 

18 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

19B 

(LRAF) 

4 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

20 

(LP.AF) 

8 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

21 

(LP.AF.ES) 

30 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

22 

(LP.AF) 

15 

Clearcut 

Tractor/Jammer 

Abla-Vasc 

23 

(LP.AF) 

15 

Clearcut 

Tractor/Jammer 

Abla-Vasc 

25 

(LP.AF.ES) 

24 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

26 

(LP.AF.ES) 

9 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

27 

(LP.AF) 

10 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

27A 

(LP.AF, DF) 

6 

Clearcut 

Cable 

Abla-Vasc/Caru 

28 

(LP.AF) 

14 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

28A 

(DF.  LP.AF) 

4 

Clearcut 

Cable 

Abla-Vasc/Caru 

29 

(DF.LP) 

14 

Group  Shelterwood 

Skyline 

Psme/Caru 

29A 

(LP.AF.DF) 

14 

Group  Shelterwood 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc/Caru 

30 

(DF.LP) 

21 

Group  Shelterwood 

Tractor 

Psme-Caru 

S5 

(LP.AF) 

15 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

S6 

(DF) 

25 

Group  Shelterwood 

Tractor 

Psme-Caru 

S7 

(DF) 

25 

Group  Shelterwood 

Tractor 

Psme-Caru 

S11 

(DF) 

25 

Shelterwood 

Tractor 

Alba-Caru 

S12 

(LP.AF) 

15 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

S13 

(LP.AF) 

15 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

Si  4 

(LRAF) 

10 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

S15 

(LRAF) 

15 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

S16 

(LP.AF) 

12 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

S17 

(LP.AF) 

6 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

Abla-Abies 

lasiocarpa  (Subalpine  fir); 

Caru-Calamagrostis  rubesce 

ns  (Pinegrass)  Psme-Pseudotsuga 

menziesii(Douglas-fir);  Alsi 

Alnus  sinu 

ata  (Mt  Alder)  Vasc-Vacciniu 

m scorparium  (Grouse  Whortleberry) 

l>. 


I ft 


\ 


\ 


\ 


fPetesI  Gu^~^~'lS pring  j l/>20C^ 


/I  S&345 


\' 


MOV 


1 1 


12 


BM, 


;S17 


13 


r*> 


GX 


L26 


v9085i’ 


1 

j ' / )L  f->7  \^! 
Moyfi  r'Ba  si# 


Moyer 
eak 


/ 


19 


8903 


> 2 3 


Ji 


J 


V 


LEGEND 

ANALYSIS  AREA 
BOUNDARY 

EXISTING  ROADS 
WSTH-IN  BOUNDARY 

PROPOSED  ROADS 


_ _ 


:vi_3i 1 .c-^O 

<.  ^Squaw^Oard 
. Meadow 

I /'&  Nl  19 


28 


(RISE 


j892S 

X]  " — f i ^ 

VM.  2^/.fr  ^ 

jj  85^J'  " 


32 


33 

88 32;'" 

\ '» 


Q^>  CUTTING  UNITS 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 

FIGURE  11-2 
ALTERNATIVE  2 


/’N 

* » 


WILDLIFE  SUBDIVISION 
BOUNDARY 


SCALE 


MILES 


0 


1 


2 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  II 


ALTERNATIVE  2 

This  alternative  was  used  in  the  internal  and  public  scoping  process  in  an  effort  to  implement  Forest  Plan 
direction  and  to  identify  issues  which  other  alternatives  are  designed  to  address.  This  alternative  emphasizes 
timber  harvesting  and  natural  regeneration  that  would  improve  the  health  and  vigor  of  the  forest  while  meeting 
all  other  resource  needs. 

Sale  layout  would  be  designed  to  meet  resource  objectives  by  limiting  unit  size,  shape,  and  total  acres 
treated.  Optimum  treatment  of  insect  and  disease  conditions,  and  economic  efficiency  of  harvesting  may  not 
occur  in  order  that  standards  and  guidelines  for  other  resources  may  be  met.  Emphasis  would  be  on 
maximizing  sawlog  production  for  those  areas  treated.  In  this  alternative,  the  entire  area  would  be  accessed 
from  one  road,  an  extension  of  Forest  Service  Road  106  (Swan  Peak  Road)  (Figure  11-2). 

Total  area  that  would  be  treated  (acres) 

568 

Total  volume  that  would  be  harvested  (mmbf) 

4.9 

Miles  of  road 

Constructed: 

16.8 

Reconstructed: 

1.3 

Number  of  cutting  units 

Douglas-fir 

7 

Lodgepole  pine  or  mixed  lodgepole  pine, 

25 

subalpine  fir  and  Engelmann  spruce 

Clearcut  Cutting  Methods: 

Amount  clearcut  (acres) 

410 

Logging  Methods: 

tractor  (acres) 

400 

cable  (acres) 

10 

Slash  Disposal  Method: 

piled  and  burned  (acres) 

310 

broadcast  burned  (acres) 

100 

Machine  Scarification  (acres) 

50-100 

Shelterwood  Cutting  Method: 

Amount  Shelterwood  (acres) 

158 

Logging  Methods: 

tractor  (acres) 

144 

cable  (acres) 

14 

Slash  Disposal  Method: 

piled  and  burned  (acres) 

★ 

broadcast  burned  (acres) 

0 

Machine  Scarification  (acres) 

144 

* Slash  will  be  lopped,  scattered  and  redistributed  during  the  scarification  process.  Only  concentrations  may 

be  burned. 

11-9 


y©y©r  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  II 


In  addition  to  the  mitigation  measures  common  to  all  the  action  alternatives,  the  following  mitigation  applies: 

Slash  will  be  placed  from  right-of-way  windrow  back  on  road  prism  to  form  'jackpot1  type  piles  with 
a minimum  diameter  of  25  feet  and  an  average  height  of  4 to  6 feet  after  completion  of  timber  removal 
and  during  slash  disposal.  The  timber  sale  contract  will  contain  provisions  for  this  procedure. 

Piles  will  be  placed  at  1 00  to  200  foot  (avg.  of  1 50  foot)  intervals,  will  extend  from  cutslope  to  fill  slope, 
and  will  be  of  sufficient  magnitude  and  continuity  to  discourage  all  travel  on  the  road  prism  by  humans 
on  foot  and/or  horseback.  Openings  created  in  the  windrows  by  construction  of  these  piles  will  serve 
as  big  game  travelways  and  should  not  have  residual  slash  in  excess  of  1 8 inches  high. 

A map  showing  the  roads  (last  1/2  mile  of  Road  # 60286.1  and  on  all  of  roads  60286.2,  6Q286-C  and 
60288)  where  slash  piling  will  occur  is  contained  in  the  Project  File. 

For  water  quality  protection,  windrows  will  not  be  disturbed  where  the  distance  from  the  toe  of  the 
fill  slope  to  live  water  is  less  than  200  feet. 


7 


|/  ( ^Oa  A 


14 


J 

* 


1 3 


Unit 

Major 

Number 

Species 

Acres 

Harvest  Method 

Yarding  Method  Habitat  Type 

ie 


68^0 

if1' 


1 


HcPor^ 


$rove 


)NA 


(LP.AF.ES, DF) 
(LP.AF.ES.DF) 
(LP.AF.ES. DF) 
(DF.LP.AF) 
(LP.AF) 
(LP.AF.DF) 
(LP.DF) 
(LP.DF.ES) 
(DF) 
(LP.AF) 
(LP.AF) 
(LP.AF.ES) 
(LP.AF.ES) 
(LP.AF) 
(LP.AF.DF) 
(LP.AF.ES) 
(DF.LP.AF) 
(DF) 

(LP.AF.DF) 
(DF.  LP) 
(LP.AF) 
(DF) 

(DF) 

(DF) 

(LP.AF) 


Clearcut 

Clearcut 

Clearcut 

Shelterwood 

Clearcut 

Clearcut 

Clearcut 

Shelterwood 

Shelterwood 

Clearcut 

Clearcut 

Clearcut 

Clearcut 

Clearcut 

Clearcut 

Clearcut 

Clearcut 

Group  Shelterwood 
Group  Shelterwood 
Group  Shelterwood 
Clearcut 

Group  Shelterwood 
Group  Shelterwood 
Shelterwood 
Clearcut 


Tractor 

Tractor 

Tractor 

Tractor 

Tractor 

Tractor 

Tractor 

Skyline 

Skyline 

Tractor 

Tractor 

Tractor 

Tractor 

Tractor 

Cable 

Tractor 

Cable 

Skyline 

Tractor 

Tractor 

Tractor 

Tractor 

Tractor 

Tractor 

Tractor 


Abla-Vasc 

Abla-Vasc/Alsi 

Abla-Vasc/Alsi 

Abla-Caru/Vasc 

Abla-Vasc 

Abla-Vasc 

Abla-Vasc 

Psme/Caru 

Psme/Caru 

Abla/Vasc 

Abla/Vasc 

Abla-Vasc 

Abla-Vasc 

Abla-Vasc 

Abla-Vasc/Caru 

Abla-Vasc 

Abla-Vasc/Caru 

Psme/Caru 

Abla-Vasc/Caru 

Psme-Caru 

Abla-Vasc 

Psme-Caru 

Psme-Caru 

Abla-Caru 

Abla-Vasc 


' I n WQ\  I" 

, W.lt — iFT.^r 

HQ  I //  < 


3.6' 


rDou^a^r!av^rwP,a,(SUb'AIPine  Als|-Alnus  <M>  Alder,  Psme-Pseudo.suga  menziesii 

(Pine9grass)'  Vasc‘Vacclnlum  scorparium  (Grouse  Whortleberry);  Caru-Calamagrostis  rubescens 


3 1 


" \ I il>eteslGiV?t-''ISprma  | i'  ^ AM  V-4. 

' 1 ( i<  1 */i  -;,-83 1 W V\  7.. . 

" 1 1 ft  f Mi  4 it'2  1 I 

i jj  _L  3®  __l 1 JL  Ji 


(D, 


?V4£||r 


I- 


1 

MdyedLRasi 


19 


./ 


1 1 *T  J 

8903X&  , ^ 

^^Squaw^darcT-^ 
I Meado^ 

/ 1 ;sft  Nl  “ 


t/ 


ANALYSIS  AREA 
BOUNDARY 

EXISTING  ROADS 
WSTH-IN  BOUNDARY 


I 25 

' 4''  , „ 

28  | . '-'2-7-  2 6^/  j * 

P 8532'T.- 


R19E 


\ 


\ PROPOSED  ROADS 


CUTTING  UNITS 


32 


33 

883V'- 

\ '« 


/ 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 

FIGURE  11-3 
ALTERNATIVE  3 


V ^ J WILDLIFE  SUBDIVISION 
BOUNDARY 


SCALE 


MILES 


0 


1 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  II 


ALTERNATIVE  3 

This  alternative  was  developed  to  respond  to  concerns  about  the  effects  of  the  proposed  action  on  wildlife, 
in  particular  the  effects  on  key  elk  summer  range.  This  alternative  was  developed  with  substantive  input 
provided  during  the  public  comment  period  by  members  of  the  public  . 

This  alternative  eliminates  1 1 clearcuts  totaling  170  acres  contained  in  Alternative  II  and  adds  two  clearcuts 
totaling  30  acres  (Figure  11-3).  Access  to  the  analysis  area  would  be  from  two  roads:  cutting  units  in  the 
Woodtick  Creek  area  would  be  accessed  by  a road  extending  from  the  existing  F.S.  Road  106,  and  those 
in  the  Salt  Creek  and  ‘Perm'  Creek  area  would  be  accessed  by  a road  extending  from  existing  F.S.  Road  1 07. 
The  existing  roads  would  be  reconstructed  to  Forest  road  specifications.  This  configuration,  with  fewer 
clearcuts  and  access  by  two  roads,  would  provide  a large  area  in  the  center  of  the  analysis  area  in  which 
no  harvesting  or  road  building  would  take  place. 


Total  area  that  would  be  treated  (acres)  440 

Total  volume  that  would  be  harvested  (mmbf)  3.75 

Miles  of  road 

Constructed:  14.6 

Reconstructed:  9.3 

Number  of  cutting  units 

Douglas-fir  9 

Lodgepole  pine  or  mixed  lodgepole  pine,  1 6 

subalpine  fir  and  Engelmann  spruce 

Clearcut  Cutting  Methods: 

Amount  clearcut  (acres)  270 

Logging  Methods: 

tractor  (acres)  260 

cable  (acres)  10 

Slash  Disposal  Method: 

piled  and  burned  (acres)  1 50 

broadcast  burned  (acres)  120 

Machine  Scarification  (acres)  50-1 00 

Shelterwood  Cutting  Method: 

Amount  Shelterwood  (acres)  1 70 

Logging  Methods: 

tractor  (acres)  144 

cable  (acres)  26 

Slash  Disposal  Method: 

piled  and  burned  * 

broadcast  burned  0 

Machine  Scarification  (acres)  144 

* Slash  will  be  lopped,  scattered  and  redistributed  during  the  scarification  process.  Only  concentrations  may 
be  burned. 


II  - 13 


Moyer  Sat  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  li 


In  addition  to  the  mitigation  measures  common  to  all  the  action  alternatives,  the  following  mitigation  applies: 

Slash  will  be  placed  from  right-of-way  windrow  back  on  road  prism  to  form  "jackpot"  type  piles  with 
a minimum  diameter  of  25  feet  and  an  average  height  of  4 to  6 feet  after  completion  of  timber  removal 
and  during  slash  disposal.  The  timber  sale  contract  will  contain  provisions  for  this  procedure. 

Piles  will  be  placed  at  1 00  to  200  foot  (avg.  of  1 50  foot)  intervals,  will  extend  from  cutslope  to  fill  slope, 
and  will  be  of  sufficient  magnitude  and  continuity  to  discourage  all  travel  on  the  road  prism  by  humans 
on  foot  and/or  horseback.  Openings  created  in  the  windrows  by  construction  of  these  piles  will  serve 
as  big  game  travelways  and  should  not  have  residual  slash  in  excess  of  1 8 inches  high. 

A map  showing  the  roads  (last  1/2  mile  of  Road  # 60286.1  and  on  all  of  roads  60286.2,  60286-C  and 
60288)  where  slash  piling  will  occur  is  contained  in  the  Project  File. 

For  water  quality  protection,  windrows  will  not  be  disturbed  where  the  distance  from  the  toe  of  the 
fill  slope  to  live  water  is  less  than  200  feet. 


II  - 14 


Unit 

Number 

Major 

Species 

Acres 

Harvest  Method 

Yarding  Method  Habitat  Type 

1W 

(LP.AF.DF) 

23 

CC/lsland 

Tractor 

(LP.AF.DF) 

32 

CC/lsland 

Tractor 

(LP.AF.DF) 

29 

CC/lsland 

Tractor 

(LP.AF.DF) 

40 

CC/lsland 

Tractor 

(LP.AF.ES. DF) 

48 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

(LP.AF.ES, DF) 

12 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

(LP.AF.ES.DF) 

33 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

(DF.LP.AF) 

34 

Shelterwood 

Tractor 

Abla-Caru/Vasc 

(LP.AF.ES) 

20 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

(LP.AF.ES) 

36 

CC/lsland 

Tractor 

(LP.AF) 

16 

CC/lsland 

Tractor 

(LP.AF) 

18 

CC/lsland 

Tractor 

(LP.AF) 

4 

CC/lsland 

Tractor 

(LP.AF) 

8 

CC/lsland 

Tractor 

(LP.AF.ES) 

30 

CC/lsland 

Tractor 

(LP.AF) 

20 

CC/lsland 

Tractor 

23 

(LP.AF) 

20 

CC/lsland 

Tractor 

25 

(LP.AF.ES) 

24 

CC/lsland 

Tractor 

(LP.AF.ES) 

50 

CC/lsland 

Tractor 

(LP.AF.ES) 

28 

CC/lsland 

Tractor 

(DF.LP) 

44 

Irregular  Shelterwood 

Tractor 

S6 

(DF) 

95 

Irregular  Shelterwood 

Tractor 

(DF) 

29 

Irregular  Shelterwood 

Tractor 

(LP.AF) 

49 

CC/lsland 

Tractor 

Sl3 

(LP.AF) 

15 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

S14 

(LP.AF) 

10 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Sl5 

(LP.AF) 

15 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

S16 

(LP.AF) 

12 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

(LP.AF) 

6 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

(LP.AF) 

15 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

Abla-Abies  lasiocarpa  (Subalpine  fir); 

Caru-Calamagrostis  rubescens  (Pinegrass)  Psme- 

Pseudotsuga  menziesii  (Douglas-fir); 

Alsi-Alnus  sinuata  (Mt  Alder)  Vasc-Vaccinium  scorparium 

(Grouse  Whortleberry);  CC  (Clearcut) 

Island  (Uncut  areas  scattered  throughout 

the  units) 

EXISTING  ROADS 
WITH-IN  BOUNDARY 

"N  PROPOSED  ROADS 

CUTTING  UNITS 


WILDLIFE  SUBDIVISION 
BOUNDARY 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 

FIGURE  11-4 
ALTERNATIVE  4 


T19N 


o 


i 


1 MILES 

2 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  II 


ALTERNATIVE  4 

This  alternative  was  developed  to  respond  to  concerns  about  the  economic  viability  of  the  other  action 
alternatives  and  their  effectiveness  in  treating  insect  and  disease  conditions  within  the  project  area.  Alternative 
4 implements  the  timber  management  direction  of  the  Forest  Plan  to  its  fullest  and  may  not  meet  resource 
objectives  for  other  resources. 

Most  of  the  cable  logging  units  contained  in  Alternatives  2 and  3 would  be  eliminated  in  order  to  increase 
the  economic  efficiency  of  the  proposed  action  (Figure  11-4).  Cutting  unit  size  was  determined  by  Forest  Plan 
Silvicultural  and  Insect  and  Disease  standards  and  guidelines  that  are  designed  to  maximize  growth,  health, 
and  vigor  and  minimize  insect  and  disease  infestation  of  the  treated  stands.  Clearcut  cutting  unit  size  may 
reach  60  acres  in  lodgepole  pine  stands  where  dwarf  mistletoe  levels  are  high  (unit  # 22).  Shelterwood  unit 
size  in  Douglas-fir  stands,  designed  to  control  Douglas-fir  beetle  and  Western  spruce  budworm,  would 
exceed  40  acres  (unit  # 30).  The  size  of  these  units  was  determined  by  the  amount  and  size  of  existing  natural 
regeneration  and  the  size  of  natural  openings  used  by  big  game. 

Total  area  that  would  be  treated  (acres) 

847 

Total  volume  that  would  be  harvested  (mmbf) 

6.9 

Miles  of  road 

Constructed: 

17.8 

Reconstructed: 

9.3 

Number  of  cutting  units 

Douglas-fir 

5 

Lodgepole  pine  or  mixed  lodgepole  pine, 

25 

subalpine  fir  and  Engelmann  spruce 

Clearcut  Cutting  Methods: 

Amount  clearcut  (acres) 

645 

Logging  Methods: 

tractor  (acres) 

645 

cable  (acres) 

0 

Slash  Disposal  Method: 

piled  and  burned  (acres) 

545 

broadcast  burned  (acres) 

100 

Machine  Scarification  (acres) 

50-100 

Shelterwood  Cutting  Method: 

Amount  Shelterwood  (acres) 

202 

Logging  Methods: 

tractor  (acres) 

202 

cable  (acres) 

0 

Slash  Disposal  Method: 

piled  and  burned 

* 

broadcast  burned 

0 

Machine  Scarification  (acres) 

202 

* Slash  will  be  lopped,  scattered  and  redistributed  during  the  scarification  process.  Only  concentrations  may 

be  burned. 

II  - 17 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EiS 


Chapter  ii 


In  addition  to  the  mitigation  measures  common  to  all  the  action  alternatives,  the  following  mitigation  applies: 

Slash  will  be  placed  from  right-of-way  windrow  back  on  road  prism  to  form  "jackpot"  type  piles  with 
a minimum  diameter  of  25  feet  and  an  average  height  of  4 to  6 feet  after  completion  of  timber  removal 
and  during  slash  disposal.  The  timber  sale  contract  will  contain  provisions  for  this  procedure. 

Piles  will  be  placed  "at  1 00  to  200  foot  (avg.  of  1 50  foot)  intervals,  will  extend  from  cutslope  to  fill  slope, 
and  will  be  of  sufficient  magnitude  and  continuity  to  discourage  all  travel  on  the  road  prism  by  humans 
on  foot  and/or  horseback.  Openings  created  in  the  windrows  by  construction  of  these  piles  will  serve 
as  big  game  travelways  and  should  not  have  residual  slash  in  excess  of  1 8 inches  high. 

A map  showing  the  roads  (last  1/2  mile  of  Road  # 60286.1  and  on  all  of  roads  60286.2,  60286-C  and 
60288)  where  slash  piling  will  occur  is  contained  in  the  Project  File. 

For  water  quality  protection,  windrows  will  not  be  disturbed  where  the  distance  from  the  toe  of  the 
fill  slope  to  live  water  is  less  than  200  feet. 


II  - 18 


0 


1 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IS 


ALTERNAT8VE  5 

This  alternative  was  developed  in  response  to  comments  received  on  the  DEIS.  It  is  intended  to  respond  to 
requests  that  'a  no  roads  access  for  timber  harvest"  be  considered  and  that  an  alternative  be  considered  that 
" addresses  harvesting  less  than  3.0  MMBF  and  constructing  less  than  10  miles  of  road. 

This  alternative  contains  4 clearcuts  and  3 shelterwood  units  totaling  approximately  292  acres  (Figure  11-5). 
Access  to  the  analysis  area  would  be  from  existing  F.S.  Road  1 07.  The  existing  roads  would  be  reconstructed 
to  Forest  road  specifications.  Approximately  1.15  miles  of  new  roads  would  be  required  to  facilitate  harvest. 
Units  1 W,  2W,  3W  and  4W  would  be  tractor  logged  clearcuts  while  units  S6,  S1 1 , and  30  would  be  helicopter 
logged  utilizing  the  standard  and  irregular  shelterwood  silvicultural  methods.  Shelterwood  harvest  units 
contained  in  Alternatives  2,  3 and  4 include  machine  scarification  and  slash  piling  as  part  of  the  prescribed 
silvicultural  system.  These  treatments  would  not  be  possible  under  this  alternative  due  to  lack  of  road  access. 
The  inability  to  perform  machine  scarification  and  slash  piling  will  result  in  delayed  regeneration  periods  and 
fuel  loadings  that  may  hinder  big  game  movement  ( please  refer  to  chapter  IV  - Environmental  Consequences 
for  a full  disclosure  of  effects). 

Total  area  that  would  be  treated  (acres) 

292 

Total  volume  that  would  be  harvested  (mmbf) 

1.79 

Miles  of  road 

Constructed: 

1.15 

Reconstructed: 

8.0 

Number  of  cutting  units 

Douglas-fir 

3 

Lodgepole  pine  or  mixed  lodgepole  pine, 

4 

subalpine  fir  and  Engelmann  spruce 

Clearcut  Cutting  Methods: 

Amount  clearcut  (acres) 

124 

Logging  Methods: 

tractor  (acres) 

124 

helicopter  (acres) 

0 

Slash  Disposal  Method: 

piled  and  burned  (acres) 

124 

broadcast  burned  (acres) 

0 

Machine  Scarification  (acres) 

0 

Shelterwood  Cutting  Method: 

Amount  Shelterwood  (acres) 

168 

Logging  Methods: 

tractor  (acres) 

0 

helicopter  (acres) 

168 

Slash  Disposal  Method: 

lop  and  scatter 

168 

broadcast  burned 

0 

Machine  Scarification  (acres) 

0 

I!  -21 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  II 


In  addition  to  the  mitigation  measures  common  to  all  the  action  alternatives,  the  following  mitigations  apply: 

1 . The  helicopter  service  landing  will  have  an  impermeable  liner  placed  under  the  fuel  storage  area; 

2.  A physical  barrier  of  sufficient  height  to  contain  any  spilled  hazardous  substance  will  be  placed 
around  the  helicopter  service  landing;  and 

3.  Restrict  fuel  hauling  for  the  helicopter  to  trucks  without  a trailer. 


11-22 


Chapter  !9 


\/>  ^OBA{.T±f[MHeli^ort 


1 3 


18 


1 

68^0  I 

19-«' 


$rove 


3.6’ 


Wq\  W ^ 

3 1 


Unit 

Number 

Major 

Species 

Acres 

Harvest  Method 

Yarding  Method 

Habitat  Type 

1W 

(LP.AF.DF) 

23 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

2W 

(LP.AF.DF) 

32 

Cle.arcut 

Tractor 

3W 

(LP.AF.DF) 

29 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

4W 

(LP.AF.DF) 

40 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

7 

(LP.AF.ES. DF) 

48 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

8 

(LP.AF.ES. DF) 

12 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc/Alsi 

9 

(LPAF.ES.DF) 

33 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc/Alsi 

10 

(DF.LP.AF) 

34 

Shelterwood 

Tractor 

Abla-Caru/Vasc 

11 

(LP.AF.ES) 

20 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

13 

(LP.AF.ES) 

36 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

19 

(LP.AF) 

16 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

19A 

(LP.AF) 

18 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

19B 

(LP.AF) 

4 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

20 

(LP.AF) 

8 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

21 

(LP.AF.ES) 

30 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

22 

(LP.AF) 

60 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

25 

(LP.AF.ES) 

24 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

26 

(LP.AF.ES) 

50 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

28 

(LP.AF.ES) 

28 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

30 

(DF.LP) 

44 

Group  Shelterwood 

Tractor 

Psme-Caru 

S6 

(OF) 

95 

Group  Shelterwood 

Tractor 

S11 

(DF) 

29 

Shelterwood 

Tractor 

Abla-Caru 

S12 

(LP.AF) 

49 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

S13 

(LP.AF) 

27 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

S14 

(LP.AF) 

10 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

S15 

(LP.AF) 

15 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

S16 

(LP.AF) 

12 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

S17 

(LP.AF) 

6 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

S18 

(LP.AF) 

15 

Clearcut 

Tractor 

Abla-Vasc 

Abla-Abies  lasiocarpa  (Si 

jbalpine  fir); 

Caru-Calamagrostis  rubescens  (Pinegrass) 

Psme- 

Pseudotsuga  menziesii  (Douglas-fir); 
(Grouse  Whortleberry) 

Alsi-Alnus  sinuata  (Mt. 

Alder)  Vasc-Vacciniu 

m scorparium 

l ^ 


5\ 


! 


|i  > 


’eteslGtr/ 


3)4--.- 

}g  | 1/^  20 


;/1  ^%345  lj  a'  I * 

^w4 

*Ti7  <=^>22^>16  .•  I \.  13  ' , u 


bm< 


Ji, 


L—  / 


19 


LEGEND 

ANALYSIS  AREA 
BOUNDARY 

EXISTING  ROADS 
WITH-IN  BOUNDARY 

‘ \ 

X PROPOSED  ROADS 
CUTTING  UNITS 


./ 


890Jjpms  | 

Squaw  Soar'd' 
Meadow 


TT 


21 


' I 25 


28 


1 a/ 


19 


Jt  Xr  5si  "'jck  30 

8530\.  ’ 


/"t 


R19E 


32 


33 

8832.'.- 

\ '» 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 

FIGURE  11-6 
ALTERNATIVE  6 


.'A 

V.y 


WILDLIFE  SUBDIVISION 
BOUNDARY 


SCALE 


T19N 


o 


i 


■f  MILES 

2 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  II 


ALTERNATIVE  6 (PREFERRED) 


This  alternative  was  developed  in  order  to  provide  a balance  between  concerns  for  visual  quality  and  insect 
and  disease  conditions  (Figure  11-6).  In  the  lodgepole  community  where  clearcutting  is  proposed,  Forest  Plan 
standards  and  guidelines  for  visual  quality  would  be  achieved  through  a combination  of  unit  size  and  leaving 
uncut  islands  ( where  slopes  permit  approximately  15%  of  the  area  within  the  clearcuts  would  be  left  in  uncut 
islands  ranging  from  1/2  to  1 acre  in  size).  Where  necessary  to  meet  visual  quality  objectives  in  the  Douglas-fir 
community,  timber  stands  would  be  harvested  using  an  irregular  shelterwood  method.  This  method  takes 
advantage  of  existing  natural  regeneration  and  in  some  cases  will  maintain  four  distinct  age  classes  and 
canopy  levels. 

The  island  concept  would  be  feasible  in  16  of  the  26  proposed  clearcuts  (units  1W,  2W,  3W,  4W,  13, 19, 19A, 
19B,  20,  21,  22,  23,  25,  26,  28,  Si 2).  Leaving  islands  within  units  containing  steep  slopes  and  heavy  fuel 
loadings  (as  in  Alternative  2A)  would  not  be  attempted.  Units  22  and  23  will  leave  approximately  30%  of  the 
area  within  the  clearcuts  in  islands  approximately  1 acre  in  size.  The  other  units  mentioned  above  will  have 
approximately  1 5%  of  the  area  within  the  clearcuts  in  islands  approximately  1 acre  in  size.  As  an  example  unit 
22  (20  acres)  would  have  approximately  6 islands  designated  (1  acre  in  size)  thus  the  treated  area  would  be 
reduced  to  14  acres.  Unit  1W  (23  acres)  would  have  approximately  3 islands  designated  (1  acre  in  size)  thus 
the  treated  area  would  be  reduced  to  approximately  20  acres. 

The  purpose  of  leaving  the  islands  is  five-fold: 

1 . Provide  a regenerated  stand  that  more  closely  approximates  the  species  mix  currently  occupying 
the  site; 

2.  To  break  up  the  units  in  order  to  provide  a more  visually  pleasing  setting  when  seen  from  a 
background  or  landscape  view; 

3.  Provide  big  game  bedding  sites  within  the  newly  created  forage  area; 

4.  Break  up  site  distances  within  the  units  to  increase  security  and  thus  use  by  big  game;  and 

5.  Ensure  protection  of  snags  and  retention  trees  that  may  otherwise  be  pushed  over  or  damaged 
during  the  skidding  and  piling  process. 


Total  area  within  harvest  units  (acres)  815 

Total  area  that  would  be  treated  (acres)  747 

Total  volume  that  would  be  harvested  (mmbf)  6.10 


Miles  of  road 
Constructed: 
Reconstructed: 


17.8 

9.3 


Number  of  cutting  units 
Douglas-fir 

Lodgepole  pine  or  mixed  lodgepole  pine, 
subalpine  fir  and  Engelmann  spruce 


4 

26 


11-25 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Salle  Final  EIS 


Chapter  II 


Clearest  Cutting  Methods: 


Amount  clearcut  (acres) 

545 

Logging  Methods: 

tractor  (acres) 

545 

cable  (acres) 

0 

Slash  Disposal  Method: 

piled  and  burned  (acres) 

445 

broadcast  burned  (acres) 

100 

Machine  Scarification  (acres) 

50-100 

SheHterwood  Cutting  Methods: 

Amount  Shelterwood  (acres) 

202 

Logging  Methods: 

tractor  (acres) 

202 

cable  (acres) 

0 

Slash  Disposal  Method: 

piled  and  burned  (acres) 

* 

broadcast  burned  (acres) 

0 

Machine  Scarification  (acres) 

202 

* Slash  will  be  lopped,  scattered  and  redistributed  during  the  scarification  process.  Only  concentrations  may 
be  burned. 

In  addition  to  the  mitigation  measures  common  to  all  the  action  alternatives,  the  following  mitigation  applies: 

Slash  will  be  placed  from  right-of-way  windrow  back  on  road  prism  to  form  "jackpot"  type  piles  with 
a minimum  diameter  of  25  feet  and  an  average  height  of  4 to  6 feet  after  completion  of  timber  removal 
and  during  slash  disposal.  The  timber  sale  contract  will  contain  provisions  for  this  procedure. 

Piles  will  be  placed  at  1 00  to  200  foot  (avg.  of  1 50  foot)  intervals,  will  extend  from  cutslope  to  fill  slope, 
and  will  be  of  sufficient  magnitude  and  continuity  to  discourage  all  travel  on  the  road  prism  by  humans 
on  foot  and/or  horseback.  Openings  created  in  the  windrows  by  construction  of  these  piles  will  serve 
as  big  game  travelways  and  should  not  have  residual  slash  in  excess  of  1 8 inches  high. 

A map  showing  the  roads  (last  1/2  mile  of  Road  # 60286.1  and  on  all  of  roads  60286.2,  60286-C  and 
60288)  where  slash  piling  will  occur  is  contained  in  the  Project  File. 

For  water  quality  protection,  windrows  will  not  be  disturbed  where  the  distance  from  the  toe  of  the 
fill  slope  to  live  water  is  less  than  200  feet. 


11-26 


7 


V ( $OB  A f rATOHel/>orf 


14 


1 3 


18 


**t° 

1 9” 


1 


19A 

19B 


Wrt  '*  A' 

U-a 

8M  ' 

rove  ?6539^MM9 

1 JP\FL^ 


3.6’ 


l Y* 


>/VA 


“Kpr,^"  f= 

W I //  < 


Harvest  Method/Special  Treatment 

Clearcut/10°/o  leave  islands/4-1  acre  islands/lv 
Clearcut/15°/o  leave  islands/2-1  acre  islands/lv 
Clearcut/10%  leave  islands/3-1  acre  islands/lv 
Modified  irregular  shelterwood/ 

Clearcut/20°/o  leave  islands/4-1  acre  islands/lv 
Clearcut/10%  leave  islands/4-1  acre  islands/lv 
Clearcut/20%  leave  islands/3-1  acre  islands/lv 
Clearcut/30%  leave  islands/5-1  acre  islands/lv 
Clearcut/No  leave  islands/leave  residual 
Clearcut/lO°/o  leave  islands/2V2  acre  islands/lv 
Clearcut/10%  leave  islands/3-1  acre  islands/lv 
Clearcut/20%  leave  islands/3-1  acre  islands/lv 
Clearcut/30%  leave  islands/4-1  acre  islands/lv 
Clearcut/20%  leave  islands/5-1  acre  islands/lv 
Clearcut/10%  leave  islands/2V2  acre  islands/lv 
Clearcut/10%  leave  islands/2V2  acre  islands/lv 
Clearcut/No  leave  islands/leave  residual 
Clearcut/15%  leave  islands/2-1  acre  islands/lv 
Clearcut/No  leave  islands/leave  residual 
Irregular  shelterwood/ 

Irregular  shelterwood/ 

Irregular  shelterwood/ 

Clearcut/20%  leave  islands/3-1  acre  islands/lv 
Modified  irregular  shelterwood/ 

Modified  irregular  shelterwood/ 

Modified  irregular  shelterwood/ 

Clearcut/30%  leave  islands/4-1  acre  islands/lv 
Clearcut/10%  leave  islands/2V2  acre  islands/lv 
Clearcut/10%  leave  islands/2V2  acre  islands/lv 
Clearcut/20%  leave  islands/3-1  acre  islands/lv 
Clearcut/10%  leave  islands/2V2  acre  islands/lv 
Clearcut/No  leave  islands/leave  residual 


residual 

residual 

residual 

residual 

residual 

residual 

residual 

residual 

residual 

residual 

residual 

residual 

residual 

residual 

residual 


residual 

residual 

residual 

residual 

residual 


Known  problems  with  steep  slopes  and  heavy  fuels.  May 


require  extra  hand  work. 


5\ 


Prospect 

1 4 \ 


pring  I J^2°C^ 

I \ i :/ 1 ishis  e 

17A £ 1 7,  I /^16  o 


‘t 


1 2 


BM , 


-4Aa-a; 


0)" 


?W:'i 


19 


1 

I V I, 

i ^ i / * 

Moye^Basity  . ^ 

LEGEND 

ANALYSIS  AREA 
BOUNDARY 

EXISTING  ROADS 
WITH-IN  BOUNDARY 


89034 


% r / 1 / 


20 


21 


l\- _ 


28 


~ ^ PROPOSED  ROADS 


CUTTING  UNITS 


o ® 

V J 


Squaw  EfbarcT 
Meado\y 

^)S24  v i 19 


r25  x . 

Vsw  ^ 

k 85*£P‘ 


RISE 


33 

883V'- 

\ 'i 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 

FIGURE  11-7 
ALTERNATIVE  2A 


WILDLIFE  SUBDIVISION 
BOUNDARY 


SCALE 


-f  MILES 


T19N 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  El 


ALTERNATIVE  2A 

This  alternative  was  developed  to  respond  to  concerns  about  visual  quality.  It  is  designed  to  mitigate  the  visual 
effects  of  timber  han/est  when  viewed  from  a landscape  or  background  view.  All  harvest  units  meet  Forest  Plan 
standards  and  guidelines  for  visual  quality  in  terms  of  size.  The  unit  sizes  and  locations  are  basically  the  same 
as  Alternative  2 (Figure  II-2A).  However,  where  slopes  permit,  from  10%  to  30%  of  the  area  within  the  clearcuts 
would  be  left  in  uncut  islands  ranging  from  approximately  1 12  to  1 acre  in  size.  In  addition,  releasable  residual 
understory  trees  that  are  free  from  disease  will  be  left  in  all  clearcuts.  In  the  Douglas-fir  community,  timber 
stands  would  be  harvested  using  an  irregular  shelterwood  method.  One  key  feature  of  this  method  is  the  delay 
of  the  removal  cut  until  the  average  height  of  the  regeneration  is  approximately  20  feet. 

The  island  concept  would  be  utilized  in  24  of  the  26  proposed  clearcuts  (units  27A  and  28A  are  small  cable 
where  no  islands  would  be  left).  As  an  example  unit  19A  (18  acres)  would  have  5 islands  designated 
(approximately  1 acre  in  size)  thus  the  treated  area  would  be  reduced  to  1 4 acres,  a reduction  of  approxi- 
mately 30%.  Unit  26  (9  acres)  would  have  2 islands  designated  (approximately  1/2  acre  in  size)  thus  the 
treated  area  would  be  reduced  to  approximately  8 acres,  a reduction  of  approximately  1 0%.  In  units  with 
heavy  fuel  loadings  and  steep  slopes,  some  islands  would  be  destroyed  during  the  slash  piling  or  burning 
processes.  The  degree  to  which  the  residual  understory  will  be  maintained  will  depend  upon  slope,  fuel 
loading,  and  the  condition  of  the  understory. 

The  main  purpose  of  the  leaving  the  islands  is  to  break  up  the  units  in  order  to  provide  a more  visually  pleasing 
setting  when  seen  from  a background  or  landscape  view.  However  the  islands  do  provide  other  benefits 
which  include: 

1 . Provide  a regenerated  stand  that  more  closely  approximates  the  species  mix  currently  occupying 
the  site; 

2.  Provide  big  game  bedding  sites  within  the  newly  created  forage  area; 

3.  Break  up  site  distances  within  the  units  to  increase  security  and  thus  use  by  big  game;  and 

4.  Ensure  protection  of  snags  and  retention  trees  that  may  otherwise  be  pushed  over  or  damaged 
during  the  skidding  and  piling  process. 


Total  area  within  harvest  units  (acres)  560 

Total  area  that  would  be  treated  (acres)  502 

Total  volume  that  would  be  harvested  (mmbf)  4.20 

Miles  of  road 

Constructed:  16.8 

Reconstructed:  1 .3 

Number  of  cutting  units 

Douglas-fir  7 

Lodgepole  pine  or  mixed  lodgepole  pine,  25 

subalpine  fir  and  Engelmann  spruce 


11-29 


flayer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  ESS 


Chapter  I! 


Ciearcut  Cutting  Methods: 
Amount  ciearcut  (acres) 


344 


Logging  Methods: 
tractor  (acres) 
cable  (acres) 


334 

10 


Slash  Disposal  Method: 

piled  and  burned  (acres) 
broadcast  burned  (acres) 


244 

100 

50-100 


Machine  Scarification  (acres) 


Shelterwood  Cutting  Method: 


Amount  Shelterwood  (acres) 


158 


Logging  Methods: 
tractor  (acres) 
cable  (acres) 


144 

14 


Slash  Disposal  Method: 
piled  and  burned 
broadcast  burned 


0 

144 


Machine  Scarification  (acres) 


* - slash  will  lopped,  scattered,  and  redistributed  during  the  scarification  process.  Only  concentrations  may 


In  addition  to  the  mitigation  measures  common  to  all  the  action  alternatives,  the  following  mitigation  applies: 

Slash  will  be  placed  from  right-of-way  windrow  back  on  road  prism  to  form  ’jackpot"  type  piles  with 
a minimum  diameter  of  25  feet  and  an  average  height  of  4 to  6 feet  after  completion  of  timber  removal 
and  during  slash  disposal.  The  timber  sale  contract  will  contain  provisions  for  this  procedure. 

Piles  will  be  placed  at  1 00  to  200  foot  (avg.  of  1 50  foot)  intervals,  will  extend  from  cutslope  to  fill  slope, 
and  will  be  of  sufficient  magnitude  and  continuity  to  discourage  all  travel  on  the  road  prism  by  humans 
on  foot  and/or  horseback.  Openings  created  in  the  windrows  by  construction  of  these  piles  will  serve 
as  big  game  travelways  and  should  not  have  residual  slash  in  excess  of  1 8 inches  high. 

A map  showing  the  roads  (last  1/2  mile  of  Road  # 60286.1  and  on  all  of  roads  60286.2,  60286-C  and 
60288)  where  slash  piling  will  occur  is  contained  in  the  Project  File. 

For  water  quality  protection,  windrows  will  not  be  disturbed  where  the  distance  from  the  toe  of  the 
fill  slope  to  live  water  is  less  than  200  feet. 


be  burned. 


11-30 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  II 


MANAGEMENT  AND  MITIGATION 

Site-specific  management  and  mitigation  measures  developed  by  the  ID  Team  for  each  of  the  resources  in 
the  Moyer  Salt  and  Salt  Creek  Timber  Sale  analysis  area  are  listed  in  Table  11-1.  These  measures  were 
developed  by  applying  various  State  and  Federal  standards  and  guidelines  and  Best  Management  Practices 
that  govern  how  timber  harvesting  and  road  construction  are  implemented  to  the  site-specific  conditions  that 
occur  in  the  analysis  area.  The  sources  for  the  various  regulations  are  given  at  the  beginning  of  each  resource 
section.  For  further  information  the  reader  is  referred  to  the  references  given,  in  particular  the  Forest  Plan 
(Chapter  IV)  and  the  Summary  of  Soil  and  Water  Best  Management  Practices  in  Appendix  B. 


TABLE  SI-1:  MANAGEMENT  AND  MITIGATION  MEASURES  SPECIFIC  TO  ALL  ACTION  ALTERNATIVES 


SOILS:  1.  All  cut  and  fill  slopes  would  be  reseeded  to  grass  and  slopes  would 

(Forest  Plan)  be  left  in  a roughened  condition  to  catch  the  seed  and  fertilizer  and  to 

minimize  the  loss  off-slope.  The  seed  mixture  would  include  species 
adaptable  to  all  soils  types  and  aspects. 

2.  All  native  surfaced  roads  that  would  be  closed  behind  gates  would  be 
harrowed,  seeded  to  grass  and  fertilized  as  soon  as  possible  after  timber 
harvesting,  except  if  graveled. 

3.  All  disturbed  sites,  including  cut  and  fill  slopes,  would  be  seeded  in  the 
fall  of  the  year  they  are  built.  If  roads  are  built  during  winter  months,  they 
would  be  seeded  if  there  is  less  than  1 to  2 feet  of  snow  on  the  ground. 

4.  At  the  end  of  the  second  growing  season,  an  established  grass  stand 
should  be  present  on  the  reseeded  areas  or  efforts  would  be  taken  to 
reseed.  A minimum  average  of  40  percent  vegetative  cover,  including 
plant  basal  area  and  litter,  constitutes  an  established  grass  stand. 

5.  All  proposed  waterbars  and  dips  on  temporary  roads  and/or  skid  trails 
would  be  constructed  before  the  ground  freezes.  Spacing  requirements 
outlined  in  the  Forest  Plan  would  be  followed. 

6.  Waterbars  would  be  installed  on  all  skid  trails  immediately  after  harvest- 
ing a unit  and  before  moving  on  to  the  next  timber  harvest  unit. 

7.  All  constructed  landing  sites  would  be  ripped,  reseeded  to  grass  and 
fertilized. 

8.  All  timber  harvest  units  will  be  field  checked  before  burning  to  determine 
the  estimated  fuel  load  present  (in  tons/acre)  and  to  determine  how  much 
must  be  burned  in  order  to  yield  1 0 to  1 5 tons/acre  of  residual  material. 


11-31 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  E8S 


Chapter  II 


TABLE  11-1:  MANAGEMENT  AND  MITIGATION  MEASURES  SPECIFIC  TO  ALL  ACTION 

ALTERNATIVES:  continued 

Soils,  continued  9.  All  timber  harvest  units  that  are  machine  piled  and  burned  will  have  the 

burned  and  unburned  material  redistributed  evenly  over  the  unit  after 
burning. 

10.  Total  site  productivity  will  be  protected  and/or  maintained  at  a level 
equal  to  or  greater  than  90  percent  of  natural  (reference  Forest  Plan 
IV-59). 

1 1 . A minimum  of  80  percent  of  an  activity  area  will  remain  in  a non- 
detrimentally  disturbed  condition,  (reference  Forest  Plan  IV-59). 

12.  Total  or  essentially  total  soil  resource  commitment  (in  areas  such  as 
roads  and  log  landings)  will  not  exceed  5 percent  of  the  analysis  area. 

13.  Some  boles  will  be  left  on  site  to  serve  as  natural  sediment  catches  on 
disturbed  slopes. 

14.  A designated  skid  trail  would  be  utilized  in  harvest  units  7,  8 and  9, 
located  in  the  Woodtick  Creek  area,  to  minimize  soil  resource  damage. 

1 5.  Soil  productivity  would  be  maintained  in  each  harvest  unit  by  retaining 
1 0 to  1 5 tons/acre  of  slash,  including  large  woody  debris  (greater  than  3 
inches  diameter)  as  microbial  host  material  and  smaller  woody  debris  for 
nutrient  reservoirs. 

1 6.  Broadcast  burning  would  be  performed  in  such  a way  that  1 0 to  1 5 
tons  of  large  woody  debris  and  one  inch  of  the  O (organic  matter)  Horizon 
remain  after  burning. 

17.  Brush  blade  will  be  used  for  clearing  slash  off  roads  and  landings 
during  operation  to  keep  slash  piles  free  of  soil. 


HYDROLOGY:  1.  The  requirements  for  stream  protection  zones  (IFPA)  and  filter  strips 

(Best  Management  Practices  in  the  Idaho  Forestry  Practices  Act,  Forest 
Plan,  and  Forest  Service  Manual;  see  Appendix  B)  would  be  closely 
followed  to  prevent  adverse  impacts  to  water  quality 

2.  Road  construction  and  timber  harvest  activities  would  be  conducted 
according  to  the  "Performance  Criteria  to  be  Observed  to  Protect  Stream 
Channels"  (Forest  Service  Manual  2505.1-2)  as  specified  in  the  Memoran- 
dum of  Understanding  with  the  Idaho  Dept,  of  Water  Resources. 

3.  The  Soil  and  Water  Best  Management  Practices  specified  in  the  Forest 
Plan  and  in  the  Idaho  Forestry  Practices  Act  will  be  followed  (See  Ap- 
pendix B:  Summary  of  BMP’s). 

4.  All  temporary  roads  will  be  constructed,  used,  physically  closed,  and 
reseeded  to  grass  before  the  ground  freezes  in  the  fall.  Roads  that  will  be 
left  open  over  the  winter  will  be  designed  specified  roads  and  will  have 
adequate  drainage  structures  installed  to  prevent  resource  damage. 


11-32 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  II 


TABLE  11-1 : MANAGEMENT  AND  MITIGATION  MEASURES  SPECIFIC  TO  ALL  ACTION 

ALTERNATIVES:  continued 

Hydrology,  (cont.)  5.  All  areas  disturbed  by  road  construction  will  be  seeded  in  the  fall  of  the 

year  they  are  disturbed,  as  specified  in  the  engineering  contract  specifica- 


tions. 

6.  Tractor  units  with  slopes  greater  than  45  percent  would  be  appraised 
for  hand  construction  of  waterbars  to  ensure  that  effective  waterbars  are 
placed  on  the  steeper  slopes.  The  contractor  may  use  a machine  to 
construct  the  waterbars  but  must  finish  them  by  hand  if  they  are  driven 
over  after  their  construction. 

7.  Reseed  all  disturbed  skid  trails  to  grass  after  the  construction  of  water- 
bars  to  ensure  soil  stabilization  and  minimize  the  invasion  of  noxious 
weeds. 

8.  Where  specified,  machine  scarification  for  site  preparation  would  be 
limited  to  alternating  strips  run  on  the  contour.  No  machine  scarification 
would  be  done  within  the  stream  protection  zone  or  filter  strips. 

9.  To  prevent  sediment  movement  downslope,  slash  windrows  would  be 
placed  along  the  toe  of  the  fill  slope  on  all  new  roads.  Continuous 
windrows  would  extend  out  from  the  stream  crossing  until  an  adequate 
filter  strip  exists  between  the  toe  of  the  fill  and  the  stream.  Outside  the  filter 
strip,  short  segments  of  the  windrow  will  be  removed  at  regular  intervals 
for  wildlife  movement. 

1 0.  Reseed  to  grass  and  recontour  all  temporary  roads  not  planned  for 

salvage  operations. 

WETLANDS 

1 . The  limits  of  the  wet  areas  along  the  lower  boundary  of  Units  25  and  SI  4 
will  be  flagged  so  that  surface  disturbance  within  these  wetland  areas 
would  be  avoided. 

FISHERIES: 
(Forest  Plan) 

1 . Appropriate  crossing  structures  would  be  installed  in  ail  Woodtick 
Creek,  Goodluck  Creek  and  Salt  Creek  (Alternative  3 only)  crossings  to 
maintain  fish  passage  opportunities. 

2.  The  current  obstacle  to  fish  passage  at  the  intersection  of  Woodtick 
Creek  and  Road  1 07,  located  in  section  32,  T20N,  R1 9E,  would  be  correct- 
ed in  conjunction  with  prescribed  road  reconstruction  operations  under 
Alternative  3,  4,  5,  and  6,  or  for  Alternatives  2 and  2A,  would  be  corrected 
by  listing  the  fish  passage  rehabilitation  projects  as  a priority  on  the 
Timber  sale  Improvement  Plan  (KV  Plan). 

11-33 


Moyer  SaK  Timber  Sale  Final  ESS 


Chapter  91 


TABLE  81-1:  MANAGEMENT  AND  MITIGATION  MEASURES  SPECIFIC  TO  ALL  ACTION 


Fisheries,  (cent.) 

ALTERNATIVES:  continued 

3.  Filter  strips  at  least  200  feet  wide  would  be  maintained  between 
Woodtick  Creek  and  all  adjacent  land  disturbance  activities,  excluding 
required  stream  crossing  locations.  Uncut  filter  strips  at  least  75  feet  wide 
would  be  maintained  between  all  other  perennial  streams  and  adjacent 
land  disturbance  activities,  excluding  required  stream  crossing , locations. 
Site-specific  consistency  with  Forest  Plan  filter  strip  width  criteria  would  be 
maintained  when  prescribed  minimums  exceed  75  feet  due  to  slopes, 
ground  cover  and  soil  type  constraints. 

4.  An  aquatic  stream  survey  (for  the  purpose  of  baseline  monitoring)  and 
a Timber  Sale  Improvement  Plan  (KV  Plan)  addressing  fish  habitat  im- 
provement opportunities  would  be  developed  for  the  drainage  segments 
within  the  timber  sale  area  boundaries. 

VEGETATION: 

(Forest  Plan,  Noxious  Weed 
Environmental  Assessment) 

1 . AH  disturbed  areas  (road  cut  and  fill  slopes  and  landing  areas)  would 
be  treated  for  noxious  weeds. 

2.  All  timber  harvest  activities  will  follow  the  Best  Management  Practices 
(Summarized  in  Appendix  B)  and  the  Standards  and  Guidelines  for  timber 
harvest  in  the  Forest  Plan. 

3.  Sanitize  (remove)  dwarf  mistletoe  infected  overstory  trees  on  the  edges 
of  islands  within  two  years  of  logging  (Alternatives  6 and  2A) 

WILDLIFE: 

(Forest  Plan;  Snag  Amend- 
ment to  the  Forest  Plan; 
Central  Idaho  Elk  Guidelines) 

1.  Retain  a minimum  of  one  snag  at  least  20"  diameter  breast  height 
(DBH),  six  snags  at  least  12"  DBH  and  three  snags  at  least  10°  DBH  on 
each  ten  acres  of  harvest  unit  in  the  Douglas-fir  and  spruce  fir  communi- 
ties. Retain  three  snags  at  least  1 2"  DBH  and  five  snags  at  least  1 0“  DBH 
on  each  ten  acres  of  harvest  unit  in  the  lodgepole  pine  and  subalpine  fir 
communities.  Retain  a minimum  of  one  replacement  (green)  tree  at  least 
20*  DBH  and  three  trees  at  least  12"  DBH  per  acre  in  the  Douglas-fir  and 
spruce  fir  units,  and  one  tree  at  least  12"  DBH  and  three  trees  at  least  10’ 
DBH  in  the  lodgepole  pine  and  subalpine  fir  units. 

2 . Retain  a minimum  of  50  ft.  of  12"  minimum  diameter  (large  end)  down 
and  dead  logs  per  acre  in  the  Douglas-fir  and  spruce  fir  units,  and  a 
minimum  of  33  ft  of  1 0"  minimum  diameter  (large  end)  down  and  dead  logs 
per  acre  in  the  lodgepole  pine  and  subalpine  fir  units. 

11-34 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  II 


TABLE  11-1:  MANAGEMENT  AND  MITIGATION  MEASURES  SPECIFIC  TO  ALL  ACTION 

ALTERNATIVES:  continued 

Wildlife,  (cont.)  3.  Preserve  the  integrity  of  at  least  75  percent  of  the  linear  distance  of  the 

natural  forest/  nonforest  ecotones  by  providing  at  least  a 1 00  foot  uncut 
buffer  between  the  ecotone  and  the  unit.  In  shelterwood  units  marking 
would  be  phased  in  from  the  unit  border.  An  uncut  buffer  of  two  sight 
distances  or  greater  would  be  retained  along  all  forest/nonforest  ecotones 
within  the  key  elk  summer  range  (KESR)  (see  Chapter  III,  Figure  111-2). 

4.  Restrict  timber  harvest  and  other  human  disturbance  in  a buffer  zone 
around  raptor  nests  to  times  when  the  nests  are  not  being  used.  The  size 
of  the  buffer  would  be  species  specific  per  Forest  Plan  direction  and  the 
time  of  use  would  be  site  specific. 

5.  Three  subdivisions  would  be  created  in  order  to  provide  suitable  dis- 
placement areas  for  big  game  (Figure  11-4).  Logging  and/or  road  building 
activities  would  not  occur  simultaneously  within  these  subdivisions.  No 
logging,  road  building,  or  hauling  would  occur  in  Subdivision  #2  that 
encompasses  the  Salt  Creek  area  during  big  game  hunting  season.  No 
logging,  road  building  or  hauling  would  occur  in  Subdivision  #3  during 
the  winter  critical  period  from  December  1 through  May  1 5. 

6.  The  depth  of  slash  in  units  within  the  mapped  KESR  would  not  be 
greater  than  1 .5  ft. 

7.  Gate  and  close  all  specified  roads  upon  completion  of  road  construc- 
tion. The  roads  would  remain  closed  except  during  active  periods  of  the 
sale  or  when  needed  for  post-sale  activities,  administrative  purposes,  or 
periodic  firewood  gathering. 

8.  The  spur  road  just  west  of  Moyer  Peak,  in  the  SE1/4  NW1/4  of  Section 
1 6,  will  be  closed  by  creating  an  earthen  barrier  that  prevents  vehicular 
access. 

9.  Slash  will  be  placed  from  right-of-way  windrow  back  on  road  prism  to 
form  ■jackpot"  type  piles  with  a minimum  diameter  of  25  feet  and  an 
average  height  of  4 to  6 feet  after  completion  of  timber  removal  and  during 
slash  disposal.  The  timber  sale  contract  will  contain  provisions  for  this 
procedure.  Piles  will  be  placed  at  100  to  200  foot  (avg.  of  150  foot) 
intervals,  will  extend  from  cutslope  to  fill  slope,  and  will  be  of  sufficient 
magnitude  and  continuity  to  discourage  all  travel  on  the  road  prism  by 
humans  on  foot  and/or  horseback.  Openings  created  in  the  windrows  by 
construction  of  these  piles  will  serve  as  big  game  travelways  and  should 
not  have  residual  slash  in  excess  of  1 8 inches  high. 

A map  showing  the  roads  (last  1/2  mile  of  Road  # 60286.1  and  on  all  of 
roads  60286.2,  60286-C  and  60288)  where  slash  piling  will  occur  is  con- 
tained in  the  Project  File. 

For  water  quality  protection,  windrows  will  not  be  disturbed  where  the 
distance  from  the  toe  of  the  fill  slope  to  live  water  is  less  than  200  feet. 

(This  mitigation  measure  applies  to  all  action  alternatives  except  alterna- 
tive 5.  It  is  included  in  the  description  for  alternatives  2,  3,  4,  6,  and  2A.) 


11-35 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  II 


TABLE  11-1:  MANAGEMENT  AND  MiTiGATiON  MEASURES  SPECIFIC  TO  ALL  ACTION 


THREATENED,  ENDAN- 
GERED AND  SENSITIVE 
SPECIES: 

(Forest  Plan) 

ALTERNATIVES:  continued 

1 . If  any  listed  or  proposed  Threatened,  Endangered  or  listed  Sensitive 
Species  of  animals,  fish  or  plants  are  encountered  during  the  proposed 
activities,  the  Forest  Biologist  would  be  notified  and  specific  mitigation 
measures  would  be  developed. 

2.  The  Timber  Sale  Contract  shall  include  contract  clause  C6.25#,  which 
contains  provisions  for  protection  of  habitat  for  Threatened  and  Endan- 
gered Species. 

VISUAL: 
(Forest  Plan) 

1 . Where  slopes  permit,  irregular  edges  would  be  used  for  all  harvest  unit 
boundaries. 

AIR  QUALITY: 

(Forest  Plan,  Clean  Air  Act) 

1 . Burn  piles  would  not  be  allowed  to  burn  and  smolder  over  a long  period 
of  time. 

2.  The  burn  pattern  may  be  staggered  in  order  to  minimize  air  quality 
impacts  to  the  area,  depending  on  the  burn  method. 

3.  A Timber  Sale  Burn  Plan  would  be  developed  for  the  proposed  sale  that 
considers  wind  direction  and  cumulative  smoke  impacts. 

4.  Burning  will  not  be  allowed  below  a wind  speed  of  2 miles  per  hour. 
Wind  speed  minimum  will  be  2 mph  and  up  to  10  mph,  only  under  good, 
excellent,  or  fair  dispersion  days,  depending  on  local  weather  conditions 
at  the  time  of  burning  and  moisture  content  of  the  fuels. 

5.  The  Swan  Peak  Road  and  the  Ridge  Road  may  be  closed  to  the  public 
during  the  day  of  burning,  depending  on  local  weather  conditions  at  time 
of  burning. 

6.  Dust  control  of  the  logging  roads  during  construction  and  timber  har- 
vesting will  be  controlled  by  the  addition  of  water  or  other  material  when 
required  by  the  Engineer  COR  or  the  timber  sale  administrator. 

7.  If  a timber  harvest  operation  that  utilizes  the  pile  and  burn  method  of 
slash  burning  generates  more  than  22  slash  piles,  burning  will  be  split  into 
two  or  more  burn  days.  No  more  than  22  piles  will  be  burned  in  a day;  burn 
days  must  be  excellent  dispersion  days  with  wind  speeds  between  2 and 
1 0 miles  per  hour. 

8.  All  piles  will  be  free  of  soil  to  reduce  smoldering  when  burned. 

\ 


11-36 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  81 


TABLE  11-1:  MANAGEMENT  AND  MITIGATION  MEASURES  SPECIFIC  TO  ALL  ACTION 

ALTERNATIVES:  continued 


RANGE  MANAGEMENT:  1.  Cattleguards  or  gates  would  be  used  where  newly-constructed  roads 

cross  range  management  fences. 

(Forest  Plan)  2.  Cattleguards  would  be  used  on  existing  roads  used  for  timber  sale 

activities. 


CULTURAL  RESOURCES:  1 . If  archeological  sites  are  encountered  during  this  proposed  activity,  the 

(Forest  Plan)  Cultural  Resources  specialist  would  be  notified  and  specific  mitigation 

measures  would  be  developed. 

2.  State  Historical  Preservation  Society  (SHPO)  clearance  and  approval  of 
all  requirements  in  Section  1 06  of  the  National  Historic  Preservation  Act 
would  be  obtained  before  any  ground-disturbing  activities  begin. 

3.  The  Timber  Sale  Contract  shall  contain  contract  clause  C6.24#,  which 
provides  for  the  protection  of  cultural  resources  and  allows  the  Forest 
Service  to  modify  or  cancel  the  timber  sale  contract  to  protect  cultural 
resources. 


11-37 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  II 


MONSTORING 


FOREST  PLAN  MONITORING 


The  Salmon  National  Forest  has  developed  a plan 
to  monitor  and  evaluate  implementation  of  the  For- 
est Plan,  monitor  the  effectiveness  of  management 
practices  implemented  under  the  Forest  Plan,  and 
validate  the  assumptions  and  models  used  in  plan- 
ning (Forest  Plan,  V-2-19).  This  would  provide  the 
land  manager  with  information  on  progress  toward 
achieving  the  goals,  objectives,  and  standards  of 
the  Forest  Plan.  Forest  Plan  monitoring  done  for  the 
Salmon  National  Forest  to  address  issues  pertinent 
to  the  analysis  area  include: 

1 . If  prescriptions  for  management  areas  are  ap- 
plied as  prescribed; 

2.  If  standards  and  management  guidelines  are 
being  followed; 

3.  If  objectives  of  the  Plan  are  being  achieved; 

4.  if  applications  of  prescriptions  for  manage- 
ment areas  are  responding  to  public  issues, 
management  concerns,  and  management  op- 
portunities; 

5.  If  effects  of  Plan  implementation  are  occurring 
as  predicted; 

6.  If  costs  of  Plan  implementation  are  as  predict- 
ed; 

7.  If  management  practices  on  non-Forest  lands 
adjacent  to  and  within  the  Forest’s  boundaries 
are  affecting  the  goals  and  objectives  of  the 
Plan;  and 

8.  Effects  of  Plan  implementation  on  other  land 
and  resource  management  agencies  and  or- 
ganizations. 

A monitoring  program  is  prepared  as  part  of  the 
Forests’  annua!  work  program  that  details  the 
amount  and  location  of  monitoring  to  be  accom- 
plished. Not  all  activities  on  the  Forest  are  moni- 


tored on  an  annual  basis,  and  not  all  of  the  Forest 
Plan  monitoring  requirements  listed  below  are  per- 
formed. Results  of  the  monitoring  program  are  pre- 
sented in  an  annual  Forest  Plan  Monitoring  and 

Evaluation  Report. 

The  Forest  Plan  monitoring  requirements  for  soils, 
water  and  water  quality,  fisheries,  vegetation  (tim- 
ber, including  insects  and  disease),  wildlife,  Threat- 
ened and  Endangered  Species,  visual  resources, 
cultural  resources,  economics  and  other  Forest 
resources  are  contained  in  Chapter  V of  the  Forest 
Plan  and  are  summarized  below. 

Soils:  Monitoring  of  Forest  soils  is  done  through  the 
following  methods: 

Unstable  areas  caused  by  natural  conditions 
and  off-road  vehicle  damage  are  monitored 
annually  through  aerial  surveys. 

Soils  that  are  representative  of  large  areas  of 
the  Forest  are  characterized  using  standard 
Soil  Conservation  Survey  methods. 

Erosion  that  results  from  various  forest  prac- 
tices is  quantified  and  compared. 

Soil  productivity  is  monitored  to  determine 
whether  land  management  practices  used  on 
the  Forest  are  adequate  to  meet  the  long-term 
soil  productivity  standards  and  guidelines 
specified  in  the  Forest  Plan. 

Water  and  Water  Quality:  In  order  to  achieve  water 
quality  protection,  the  Forest  would  monitor  the  fol- 
lowing aspects  of  water  quality  and  fish  habitat  pro- 
tection: 

Changes  in  water  quality,  in  stream  channel 
stability,  in  riparian  areas,  and  the  extent  of 
stream  channel  deposition  due  to  land  man- 
agement activities,  both  on  a baseline  and 
project  scale. 


11-38 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  II 


Flow  increases  due  to  timber  harvesting. 

Comparisons  of  erosion  on  inslope  versus  out- 
slope  roads;  cut  slopes  versus  fill  slopes;  road 
treads;  and  on  trails. 

Fisheries:  Fisheries  monitoring  includes  the  follow- 
ing: 

Anadromous  and  resident  fish  populations 
and  habitat  quantity  and  quality  are  monitored 
through  computer  modeling  (using  the  GAWS 
program),  fish  counts,  habitat  surveys,  angler 
use  surveys,  etc. 

Timber:  The  Forest  Plan  timber  monitoring  guide- 
lines are  designed  to  track  implementation  of  the 
timber  management  program  and  include: 

Tracking  of  regeneration  status  on  harvested 
lands  to  determine  if  restocking  is  complete  in 
five  years; 

Determining  if  openings  created  by  even-aged 
management  exceed  maximum  size  estab- 
lished in  wildlife  standards  and  guidelines; 

Review  the  five  year  timber  action  plan  and 
monitor  actual  volume  sold  to  determine  that 
sales  are  progressing,  annual  volume  is  being 
offered,  and  sale  volume  will  not  exceed  the 
1 0-year  allowable  sale  quantity. 

Insect  and  disease  infestation  levels  are  moni- 
tored through  annual  aerial  surveys. 

The  effectiveness  of  dwarf  mistletoe  or  other 
suppression  projects  designed  to  protect  re- 
generation are  monitored  through  field  review. 

Wildlife:  Wildlife  monitoring  includes  the  following: 

Management  Indicator  Species  populations 
and  habitat  trends,  particularly  those  of  big 
game  animals,  are  determined  through  aerial 
surveys,  hunter  success  rates  and  other  data 
from  the  Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Wildlife 
check  stations,  visual  counts  of  animals,  range 
inventory  data,  etc. 

Habitat  improvement  is  documented  in  the  an- 
nual Wildlife  Report. 


Old-growth  retention  stands  are  monitored  an- 
nually. 

Threatened  and  Endangered  Species: 

Observation  records  are  maintained  and  ail 
sightings  of  Threatened  and  Endangered 
Species  are  investigated,  except  for  species 
covered  by  other  surveys. 

Cultural  Resources: 

Field  monitoring  of  known  cultural  sites  is  per- 
formed to  determine  the  extent  of  natural  dete- 
rioration or  vandalism,  on  a biannual  basis  for 
easily  accessed  sites  and  every  five  years  for 
isolated  sites. 

Economics: 

An  annual  report  is  published  that  monitors 
capital  investments,  returns  to  U.S.  Treasury, 
receipt  shares  to  counties,  and  unit  costs  for 
planning  activities. 

PROJECT  MOM8TOR8NG 

Project-specific  monitoring  for  some  resources 
would  be  conducted  on  the  proposed  timber  sale 
during  timber  harvest  and  road  construction  to  en- 
sure that  implementation  is  consistent  with  the  es- 
tablished standards  and  guidelines,  specifically 
those  outlined  in  the  timber  sale  contract.  Monitor- 
ing is  also  conducted  to  determine  the  effectiveness 
of  management  activities  and  applied  mitigation 
measures  developed  for  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale 
(see  Table  11-1). 

Each  year  the  Forest  selects  three  timber  sales  for 
post-sale  review  and  inclusion  in  the  annual  moni- 
toring plan.  The  timber  sale  ID  Team,  including  spe- 
cialists in  wildlife,  timber,  hydrology  and  soils,  per- 
forms a field  review  of  the  sales.  The  goal  of  these 
reviews  is  to  determine  if  the  standards  and  guide- 
lines of  the  Forest  are  being  met  for  each  resource. 
Written  reports  of  the  review  are  included  in  the 
Forest  Service  files  and  a copy  is  sent  to  the  State 
of  Idaho  Water  Quality  Bureau  discussing  findings 
and  any  corrective  actions  to  be  taken  if  necessary. 

Most  of  the  site-specific  mitigation  measures  de- 
signed for  the  proposed  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  that 
are  described  in  Table  11-1  are  incorporated  into  the 
contract  drawn  up  between  the  timber  sale  pur- 


11-39 


SWBoyer  Salt  Umber  Sale  Final  ESS 


Chapter  II 


chaser  and  the  Forest  Service.  A Forest  Service 
timber  sale  administrator  is  assigned  to  each  sale  to 
determine  that  the  contractual  provisions  are  met. 
Mitigation  measures  not  included  in  the  contract  are 
the  responsibility  of  the  Forest  Service. 

Much  of  the  post-sale  monitoring  that  occurs  on  a 
timber  sale  is  informal  in  nature.  For  example,  when 
a member  of  the  timber  staff  is  performing  post-sale 
regeneration  field  checks  and  notices  that  there  are 
problems  with  road  erosion,  they  would  notify  the 
appropriate  resource  specialist. 

Specific  monitoring  developed  for  this  project  in- 
clude: 

Soils:  Project  level  activities  are  monitored  forest- 
wide for  changes  to  soil  productivity. 

The  Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sale  would  be  monitored 
during  implementation  to  assure  that  Soil  and  Water 
Conservation  Practices  (SWCP)  outlined  in  Forest 
Service  Soil  and  Water  Conservation  Practices 
Handbook  (FSH  2509.22)  are  implemented. 

During  project  implementation,  the  timber  sale  ad- 
ministrator will  also  monitor  soil  disturbance  associ- 
ated with  scarification  and  soil  displacement  that 
results  from  slash  piling  to  ensure  that  Forest  Plan 
standards  are  not  exceeded. 

The  reseeded  cut  and  fill  slopes  and  any  other  re- 
seeded areas  would  be  monitored  to  determine  the 
effectiveness  of  the  reseeding  effort  and  if  additional 
planting  is  required. 

All  timber  harvest  units  that  are  burned  will  be  field 
checked  after  burning  to  determine  if  1 0 to  1 5 tons 
per  acre  of  large  woody  debris  (greater  than  3.0 
inches  in  diameter)  is  left  on  the  ground  as  specified 
in  soil  mitigation  #8  (Table  11-1). 

Water  Quality  and  Fisheries:  The  timber  sale  ad- 
ministrator would  monitor  the  implementation  of  ap- 
plicable BMPs  and  mitigation  measures  (site- 
specific  BMPs)  contained  in  the  timber  sale  contract 
to  ensure  that  the  proposed  activities  do  not  impact 
water  quality  and,  consequently,  the  fisheries  re- 
source. In  particular,  BMPs  that  apply  to  skid  trail 
and  road  rehabilitation  would  be  closely  monitored. 

Beginning  in  1992  the  following  data  will  be  collect- 
ed to  document  existing  conditions  in  Woodtick 


Creek  prior  to  road  construction  and  timber  harvest- 
ing activities: 

1 . Percent  Depth  Fines  (Core  Sampling) 

2.  Wolman  Pebble  Count 

3.  Maximum/Minimum  Water  Temperature 

4.  Macroinvertebrates 

Percent  fines  and  the  Wolman  Pebble  Count  were 
measured  in  1 992  on  Woodtick  Creek,  immediately 
above  the  stream  crossing  on  Road  #107.  These 
two  parameters  will  be  measured  after  the  road  con- 
struction is  completed  in  about  1994,  and  then 
again  after  timber  harvesting  is  completed  in  about 
1 996.  Maximum/minimum  water  temperatures  were 
measured  biweekly  in  1 992  from  May-October  at  the 
mouths  of  Woodtick  Creek  and  Moyer  Creek. 
Maximum/minimum  water  temperatures  will  be 
measured  again  in  1993  to  complete  the  baseline 
database,  and  then  again  after  timber  harvesting  is 
completed  in  about  1 996.  Macroinvertebrates  were 
sampled  three  times  in  1992  above  the  mouths  of 
Woodtick  Creek  and  Moyer  Creek.  Macroinverte- 
brate samples  will  be  taken  again  in  1 993  on  both 
streams  to  complete  the  baseline  database,  and 
then  again  after  timber  harvesting  is  completed  in 
about  1 996.  Based  upon  the  results  of  the  post  sale 
monitoring,  a decision  will  be  made  as  to  whether  or 
not  there  is  a need  to  continue  the  monitoring  for  a 
longer  period  of  time. 

Vegetation  (Timber):  Timber  sale  layout  would  be 
reviewed  by  the  ID  Team  to  determine  compliance 
with  standards  and  guidelines  of  the  Forest  Plan 
prior  to  sale  award. 

The  timber  sale  administrator  would  visit  each  active 
harvest  unit  at  a frequency  necessary  to  assure 
compliance  with  the  timber  sale  contract. 

Contract  changes  or  contract  modifications  would 
be  enacted,  when  necessary,  to  meet  standards 
and  guidelines  on  the  ground. 

Stand  exams  would  be  performed  the  first,  third, 
and  fifth  year  after  harvesting  to  determine  certifica- 
tion of  regeneration.  These  exams  would  also  moni- 
tor species  composition  of  the  stands  as  well  as 
their  health  and  vigor. 


11-40 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  II 


Post-harvest  treatment  exams  and  timber  stand  im- 
provements such  as  thinning,  planting  (where  re- 
quired), and  other  cultural  treatments  would  be  per- 
formed as  required. 

Air  Quality:  All  prescribed  burning  will  be  monitored 
for  smoke  dispersion  during  the  time  of  burning  to 
ensure  that  the  burn  plan  is  followed  and  that 
SASEM  model  criteria  and  standards  set  by  the 
Clean  Air  Act  are  met. 

Wildlife:  The  Forest  Road  management  coordinator 
would  monitor  the  timing  and  effectiveness  of  road 
closures  and  maintain  the  road  closures  that  were 
identified  in  the  site-specific  mitigation  plan. 

Transportation:  The  Cobalt  district  is  funded  annu- 
ally for  road  maintenance,  to  be  used  in  part  to 


monitor  the  conditions  of  the  specified  roads  con- 
structed for  the  timber  sale. 

Cultural  Resources:  Any  project  monitoring  that  is 
required  under  Section  1 06  of  the  National  Historic 
Preservation  Act  and  as  part  of  the  State  Historic 
Preservation  Office  (SHPO)  project  approval  would 
be  performed  as  required. 


COMPARISON  OF  ALTERNATIVES 

Table  11-2  contains  a summary  of  the  effects  of  the 
alternatives  on  each  of  the  resources  discussed  in 
Chapters  III  and  IV.  The  measurement  indices  used 
to  compare  these  effects  are  those  identified  in  the 
discussion  of  the  issues  in  this  chapter.  The  reader 
is  referred  to  Chapter  IV  for  an  in-depth  discussion 
of  the  effects  of  the  alternatives. 


11-41 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sal®  Final  E1S 


Chapter  il 


TABLE  SI-2:  COMPARISON  OF  EFFECTS  OF  THE  ALTERNATIVES  BY  RESOURCE 


Measurement 

Indices 

ALT 

1 

ALT 

2 

ALT 

3 

ALT 

4 

ALT 

5 

ALT 

8 

PREFERRED 

ALT 

2A 

VEGETATION 

Vegetative  Diversity: 

Acres  Harvested 

0 

568 

440 

847 

292 

747 

502 

Age  distribution  following  harvest  (in  percent  of  analysis  area) 
(0-39  yrs)  4.9  9.3 

8.3 

11.5 

7.2 

10.7 

8.8 

(40-79  yrs) 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

(80-119  yrs 

11.7 

11.7 

11.7 

11.7 

11.7 

11.7 

11.7 

(120-159  yrs) 

69.9 

66.1 

67.1 

64.3 

68.3 

64.9 

66.6 

(165+  yrs) 

13.5 

12.9 

12.8 

12.7 

12.8 

12.7 

12.9 

Change  in  species 
diversity  in 
harvest  units 

None 

Moderate 

Increase 

Moderate 

Increase 

Moderate 

Increase 

Moderate 

Increase 

Moderate 

Increase 

Moderate 

Increase 

Timber  Resource: 

Volume  production 
in  mmbf 

0 

4.9 

3.75 

6.9 

1.79 

6.1 

4.2 

mmbf  deferred  * 

-6.1 

-1 .2 

-2.25 

0.8 

-4.31 

0 ** 

Risk  of  infesta- 
tion by  insects 
and  diseases 

Moderate 
to  High 
Increase 

Strong 

Decrease 

Moderate 

Decrease 

Strong 

Decrease 

Low 

Decrease 

Strong 

Decrease 

Low 

Decrease 

Risk  of  infesta- 
tion by  noxious 
weeds 

Very  Low 

Low 

Low 

Moderate 

Very  Low 

Moderate 

Low 

* The  amounts  given  here  represent  the  difference  between  the  largest  Forest  Plan  consistent  mmbf  alternative 
alternatives.  These  volumes  display  the  mmbf  that  would  be  deferred  from  this  offer  during  this  planning  period. 

offered  (Alternative  6)  and  the  other 

**  Alternative  6 represents  the  largest  mmbf  sale  quantity  off  that  meets  the  Forest  Plan  Standards  and  Guidelines  for  all  resources. 

Harvest  Method: 

Clearcuts  with 
Islands 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

427 

402 

Clearcut  Acres 

0 

410 

270 

645 

124 

186 

10 

Shelterwood  Acres 

0 

158 

170 

202 

168 

202 

158 

11-42 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IS 


TABLE  SI-2,  continued:  COMPARISON  OF  EFFECTS  OF  THE  ALTERNATIVES  BY  RESOURCE 

Measurement  ALT  ALT  ALT  ALT  ALT  ALT  ALT 

Indices  1 2 3 4 5 6 2A 

PREFERRED 


WILDLIFE 
Elk  and  Deer: 

* Elk  Habitat  Potential  (EHP)  (Percent  of  potential) 


Area  1 

67% 

51% 

51% 

48% 

59% 

51% 

53% 

Area  II 

87% 

90% 

88% 

92% 

88% 

90% 

89% 

Open  Road  Density: 

(Miles  road  per  square  mile) 

Area  1 

0.14 

0.14 

0.14 

0.14 

0.14 

0.14 

0.14 

Area  II 

0.56 

0.56 

0.56 

0.56 

0.56 

0.56 

0.56 

Total  Road  Density: 

(Miles  road  per  square  mile) 

Area  1 

0.14 

1.46 

2.25 

1.0 

0.14 

1.0 

1.28 

Area  II 

0.56 

2.5 

1.5 

2.9 

0.72 

2.7 

2.42 

Cover  to  Forage  Ratio: 

Area  1 

32:68 

27:73 

27:73 

26:74 

29.71 

27.73 

28.72 

Area  II 

80:20 

72:28 

75:25 

68:32 

77.23 

69.31 

73.27 

**  Elk  Habitat  Security: 

Area  1 

High 

Low 

Moderate 

Very  Low 

Moderate 

Low 

Low 

Area  II 

Very  High 

High 

High 

High 

Very  High 

High 

High 

***  Elk  Vulnerability: 

Area  1 

Moderate 

Very  High 

High 

Very  High 

High 

Very  High 

Very  High 

Area  II 

Very  Low 

Moderate 

Low 

Moderate 

Low 

Moderate 

Moderate 

****  Old-growth  Dependent  Species: 

Acres  of  Timber  Stands  with  Old  Growth  Characteristics  Remaining: 

Area  1 

1750 

1500 

1520 

1430 

1625 

1475 

1540 

Area  II 

3550 

3200 

3250 

3025 

3310 

3040 

3250 

Percent  Loss  of  Timber  Stands  with  Old  Growth  Characteristics: 

Area  1 

0% 

15% 

13% 

18% 

7% 

16% 

12% 

Area  II 

0% 

10% 

8% 

15% 

5% 

14% 

8% 

Acres  of  Forest  Plan  Designated  Old-Growth  Retention  Stands  Cut: 

Area  1 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

Area  II 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

* Elk  Habitat  Potential  (EHP)  is  the  indicator  for  effects  to  elk  and  deer  and  is  derived  from  the  cover  to  forage  ratio  and  the  miles  of  road  per  square 

**  Elk  Habitat  Security  is  30%  of  an  area  occupied  by  cover  blocks  of  250  acres  located  1/2  mile  from  open  roads. 

***  Elk  Vulnerability  reflects  ease  of  human  access  and  susceptibility  of  hunted  elk. 

****  The  acres  and  percent  loss  of  timber  stands  with  old  growth  characteristics  and  old-growth  retention  stands  are  the  indicators  for  effects  to  goshawk, 
pine  marten  and  other  old-growth  dependent  species. 


11-43 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sale  Final  EiS 


Chapter  II 


TABLE  11-2, 

continued: 

COMPARISON  OF  EFFECTS  OF  THE  ALTERNATIVES  BY  RESOURCE 

Measurement 

ALT 

ALT 

ALT 

ALT 

ALT 

ALT 

ALT 

BndSces 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

PREFERRED 

2A 

ROADLESS  AREA: 

Acres  of  Roadless 
Area  Affected 

0 

9920 

9920 

9920 

208 

9920 

9920 

Percent  of 
Taylor  Mtn. 

Roadless  Area  Affected 

0 

16% 

16% 

16% 

<1% 

16% 

16% 

Acres  of  Roadless 
Area  Remaining 

63,220 

53,300 

53,300 

53,300 

63,012 

53,300 

53,300 

Wilderness 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Eligibility  Of  Roadless  Area  Maintained 

Effects  to  Roadless  Characteristics: 

Natural  Integrity 

None 

Decrease 

Decrease 

Decrease 

Decrease 

Decrease 

Decrease 

Apparent 

None 

Decrease 

Decrease 

Decrease 

Decrease 

Decrease 

Decrease 

Naturalness 

Primitive 

None 

None 

None 

None 

None 

None 

None 

Recreation 

Solitude 

None 

Decrease 

Decrease 

Decrease 

None 

Decrease 

Decrease 

Special  Features 

None 

None 

None 

None 

None 

None 

None 

Special  Places 
and  Activities 

None 

None 

None 

None 

None 

None 

None 

i 

ECONOMIC  EFFICIENCY 

Present  Net  Value 
Long  Term  Average 

0 

-$210,077 

-$161,329 

-$300,679 

* 

-$277,853 

-$183,069 

Present  T rend 

0 

+$253,925 

+$303,502 

+$295,651 

-$94,938 

+$303,626 

+$262,241 

Gross  Stumpage  Income 
Long  Term  Average 

0 

+$400,670 

+$306,186 

+$564,444 

+$69,315 

+$498,801 

+$343,235 

Present  Trend 

0 

+$569,100 

+$525,300 

+754,200 

+$706,200 

+$527,100 

Road  Costs 
Construction 

0 

+$372,150 

+$383,850 

+$411,150 

+$42,000 

+$411,150 

+372,150 

Road  Costs/mbf 

0 

+76 

+$102 

+$60 

+$26 

+$67 

+$89 

The  economic  efficiency  of  the  alternatives  can  be  compared  by  calculating  the  present  net  value  and  gross  income  of  each  alternative.  These  were 
calculated  based  on  the  long  term  average  prices  and  with  present  prices  to  reflect  the  recent  increases  in  the  value  ot  timber. 

* No  value  was  calculated  because  this  alternative  was  not  economically  viable  (it  would  not  sell)  with  the  long  term  stumpage  values. 


11-44 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  II 


TABLE  11-2,  continued:  COMPARISON  OF  EFFECTS  OF  THE  ALTERNATIVES  BY  RESOURCE 


Measurement  ALT  ALT  ALT  ALT  ALT  ALT  ALT 

Indices  1 2 3 4 5 6 2A 

PREFERRED 


SOILS 


Existing  Roads 

16.6  mi. 

16.6  mi. 

16.6  mi. 

16.6  mi. 

16.6  mi. 

16.6  mi. 

16.6  mi. 

57  ac. 

57  ac. 

57  ac. 

57  ac. 

57  ac. 

57  ac. 

57  ac. 

New  Roads 

0 

16.8  mi. 

14.6  mi. 

17.8  mi. 

1.1  mi. 

17.8  mi. 

16.8  mi. 

0 

62.1  ac. 

55.2  ac. 

66.1  ac. 

4.0  ac. 

66.1  ac. 

62.1  ac. 

Acres  of  Total 
Soil  Resource 
Commitment 

57  ac. 

119  ac. 

Ill  ac. 

123  ac. 

61  ac. 

123  ac. 

119  ac. 

Percent  of  Analysis  Area 
with  Total  Soil 

0.4% 

0.8% 

0.7% 

0.8% 

0.4% 

0.8% 

0.8% 

Resource  Commitment  * 

* Total  soil  resource  commitment  occurs  when  the  soil  is  committed  to  a use  other  than  growing  vegetation  for  an  extended  period  of  time;  this  typically 
occurs  in  roads,  landing  areas,  and  some  skid  trails. 


HYDROLOGY 
Effects  to  Water  Yield: 


Percent  of  Drainages  Harvested*: 


Woodtick  Creek 

5.2% 

7.3% 

7.0% 

8.2% 

6.0% 

7.9% 

7.1% 

Salt  Creek 

0% 

9.1% 

4.5% 

14.3% 

5.1% 

12.3% 

8.2% 

"Perm'  Creek 

0% 

11.3% 

11.3% 

14.2% 

4.3% 

13.1% 

10.4% 

Predicted  Changes 

None 

No  Major 

No  Major 

No  Major 

Minimal 

No  Major 

No  Major 

to  Water  Yield 

Effect 

Effect 

Effect 

Effect 

Effect 

Beneficial  Water 

Yes 

Yes 

**  No 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Uses  Maintained 

State  Water 

Yes 

Yes 

**  No 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Quality  Standards  Met 

* Research  has  shown  that  harvesting  more  than  20  percent  of  a drainage  can  result  in  detectable  increases  in  peak  flow  due  to  loss  of  vegetation. 

**  Beneficial  water  uses  would  be  maintained  and  state  water  quality  standards  would  be  met  in  Woodtick  Creek  and  Moyer  Creek.  Adverse  water  quality 
impacts  are  anticipated  in  Salt  Creek  only. 


WETLANDS 

Acres  of  Wetlands  None  * <3  * <2  * <3  None  * <3  * <3 

Affected 

* These  acres  of  affected  wetlands  are  primarily  at  stream  crossings. 


II  - 45 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  II 


TABLE  11-2,  continued:  COMPARISON  OF  EFFECTS  OF  THE  ALTERNATIVES  BY  RESOURCE 


Measurement 

indices 


ALT  ALT  ALT 

1 2 3 


ALT  ALT 

4 5 


ALT  ALT 

6 2A 

PREFERRED 


FISHERIES 

Anadromous  and *  * Yes  Yes  **  No  Yes  Yes  Yes  Yes 

Resident  Fish  Habitat 

Maintained 

* The  culvert  that  is  currently  obstructing  fish  passage  where  F.S.  Road  1 07  crosses  Woodtick  Creek  will  be  corrected  through  KV  funding  with  Alternatives 
2,  3,  4,  5,  6,  and  2A,  but  is  not  scheduled  to  be  corrected  under  Alternative  1 , the  No  Action  Alternative.  Habitat  would  be  maintained  but  not  improved 
under  this  alternative. 

**  Anadromous  and  resident  fish  habitat  would  not  be  maintained  in  the  Sait  Creek  drainage,  and  habitat  within  the  mainstem  Moyer  Creek  streamcourse 
below  the  mouth  of  Salt  Creek  would  additionally  be  at  high  risk  of  being  adversely  impacted.  Habitat  would  be  maintained  within  the  Woodtick  Creek, 
Goodluck  Creek,  and  "Perm'  Creek  drainages  under  this  alternative,  however. 


THREATENED,  ENDANGERED  AND  SENSITIVE  FISH  SPECIES 

(The  final  biological  assessment  of  effects  to  T & E fish  species  is  being  documented  within  the  Salmon  National 
Forest’s  Proposed  Activity  Review  for  the  Panther  Creek  Watershed.  Concurrence  from  the  National  Marine 
Fisheries  Service  is  unknown  at  this  time). 


Effects  to  Listed 
Fish  T & E 

Species  and  Their  Habitat 

No  Effect 

Not  LTAA* 

LTAA* 

Not  LTAA* 

Not  LTAA* 

Not  LTAA* 

Not  LTAA* 

Effects  to  Poten- 
tial Fish 
T & E Habitat 

No  Change 
from  Ex- 
isting 
Condition 

Improve- 
ment in 
Woodtick 
Creek 

Improve- 
ment in 
Woodtick 
Creek 

Degradation 
in  Salt  and 
Moyer  Creeks 

Improve- 
ment in 
Woodtick 
Creek 

Improve- 
ment in 
Woodtick 
Crseek 

Improve- 
ment in 
Woodtick 
Creek 

Improve- 
ment in 
Woodtick 
Creek 

Effects  to 
Region  4 Sensi- 
tive Fish  Species 
and  Their  Habitat 

No  Effect 

*Not  LTAA 

*LTAA 
Steelhead 
and  Bull 
Trout 

*Not  LTAA 

*NOT  LTAA 

*Not  LTAA 

*Not  LTAA 

* LTAA  - Likely  to  Adversely  Affect 


THREATENED,  ENDANGERED  AND  SENSITIVE  VERTEBRATE  SPECIES 

Effects  to  Not 

Gray  Wolf  LTAA 

* LTAA  - Likely  to  Adversely  Affect 


!!  -46 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  II 


TABLE  11-2, 

continued: 

COMPARISON  OF  EFFECTS  OF  THE  ALTERNATIVES  BY  RESOURCE 

Measurement 

ALT 

ALT 

ALT 

ALT 

ALT 

ALT 

ALT 

Indices 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

3 

PREFERRED 

2A 

VISUAL  RESOURCES 

Number  of  Units 
Where  Visual 
Quality  Objectives 
Are  Not  Met 

0 

0 

0 

5 

0 

0 

0 

RECREATION 

Acres  Converted 
from  Semi-Primitive 
Motorized  & Nonmotorized 
to  Roaded  Natural  Appearing 

0 

6,990 

6,310 

6,990 

0 

6,990 

6,990 

AIR  QUALITY 

State  and 

National  Air  Quality 
Standards  Met 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

TRANSPORTATION  AND  ACCESS 

Acres  available 

for  timber  harvesting  with 

existing  road  system 

1,600 

1,600 

1,600 

1,600 

1,600 

1,600 

1,600 

Acres  available 

for  timber  harvesting  with 

proposed  road  system 

0 

2,807 

1,824 

2,957 

150 

2,957 

2,807 

Miles  of  Road 
Constructed 

0 

16.8 

14.6 

17.8 

1.1 

17.8 

16.8 

MINERALS 

Would  interfere 
with  potential 
mineral  development 

No 

No 

No 

No 

No 

No 

No 

II  - 47 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Fina!  EES 


Chapter  IS 


TABLE  SI-2,  continued:  COMPARISON  OF  EFFECTS  OF  THE  ALTERNATIVES  BY  RESOURCE 


Measurement 

Indices 


ALT  ALT  ALT 

1.2  3 


ALT  ALT 

4 5 


ALT  ALT 

S 2A 

PREFERRED 


CULTURAL  RESOURCES 

* Potential  None  Low  Low  Low  Low  Low  Low 

Impacts  to 

Cultural 

Resources 

* A cultural  resources  survey  will  be  completed  before  any  ground  disturbing  activities  begin.  Approximately  95%  of  the  area  was  cleared  by  SHPO  on 
8/18/92.  Clearance  is  expected  by  8/1/93  on  the  remaining  5%  of  the  area. 


RANGE  RESOURCES 

Change  in  Range  None 

Resource 


Minor  Im- 
provement 


Minor  Im- 
provement 


Minor  Im- 
provement 


Minor  Im- 
provement 


Minor  Im- 
provement 


Minor  Im- 
provement 


11-48 


Chapter  SSI 

Affected  Environment 


Changes  Between  the  Draft  and 


Final 

ill 

1 

Chapter  Review 

111 

1 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and 

Objectives 

111 

1 

Soil  Resources 

SSi 

1 

Hydrology 

SIS 

5 

Wetlands 

SOI 

6 

Fisheries 

Hi 

7 

Resident  Fisheries 

ill 

8 

Anadromous  Fisheries 

III 

8 

Fish  Habitat 

iBS 

8 

Biological  Diversity 

III 

10 

Timber  Resource 

in 

16 

Wildlife  Resource 

SSi 

21 

Threatened,  Endangered  and 

Sensitive  Species 

III 

24 

Roadless  Area  Resource 

III 

26 

Visual  Resources 

SIS 

30 

Recreation  Resources 

BSi 

30 

Air  Quality 

III 

31 

Range  Resources 

III 

32 

Transportation  and  Access 

IBS 

32 

Mineral  Resources 

ill 

33 

Cultural  Resources 

III 

33 

Economic  Efficiency 

IIS 

34 

Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Chapter  119 


CHAPTER  III 

AFFECTED  ENVSRONMEMT 


CHANGES  BETWEEN  THE  DRAFT  AND  FINAL 

1.  Additional  water  quality  data  was  collected 
and  discussed  in  the  Hydrology  and  Fish- 
eries sections. 

2.  A breakdown  of  wetland  acreage  by  type  is 
included  in  the  Wetland  section. 

3.  The  affected  area  and  existing  condition  de- 
scriptions for  biological  diversity  have  been 
expanded.  A map  identifying  the  Moyer  Sart 
landscape  area  and  it’s  adjacent  landscapes 
has  been  included. 

4.  An  old  growth  retention  area  map  has  been 
included  in  the  Final  EIS. 


CHAPTER  REVIEW 

This  chapter  describes  the  existing  condition  of  the 
environment  that  would  be  affected  by  the  action 
alternatives.  It  provides  the  baseline  for  comparison 
of  the  effects  on  the  environment  that  are  disclosed 
in  Chapter  IV.  The  existing  environment  of  the  area 
affected  by  the  proposed  action  is  described  in  de- 
tail in  terms  of  specific  resources  and  in  the  follow- 
ing order:  soils,  hydrology,  fisheries,  vegetation, 
wildlife,  Threatened,  Endangered  and  Sensitive 
Species,  roadless  area,  visuals,  recreation,  range, 
transportation,  minerals,  cultural  resources,  air 
quality,  and  economic  efficiency. 

The  Moyer  Salt  and  Salt  Creek  Timber  Sale  is  locat- 
ed about  22  miles  southwest  of  Salmon,  Idaho  (see 
Figure  1-1,  Chapter  I).  The  area  of  analysis  lies  be- 
tween the  Woodtick  Creek  drainage  on  the  north, 
the  Moyer  Creek  drainage  on  the  west,  Moyer  Peak 


on  the  south,  and  the  Salmon  River  Mountain  Road 
(F.  S.  Road  020)  on  the  east  (Figure  1-2,  Chapter  I). 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives 

The  Forest  Plan  has  established  goals  and  objec- 
tives that  recognize  and  promote  the  intrinsic  eco- 
logical and  economic  values  of  all  resources  in  the 
Salmon  National  Forest.  These  goals  will  be  for- 
warded in  this  context  by  direction  in  the  specific 
resource  areas.  The  goals  for  each  resource  area 
are  briefly  outlined  at  the  beginning  of  each  section 
below;  for  more  information  on  Forest  goals,  the 
reader  is  referred  to  Chapter  II  of  the  Forest  Plan. 


SOILS 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives 

The  direction  or  goal  for  soils  is  to:  maintain  soil 
productivity,  minimize  man-caused  soil  erosion,  and 
maintain  the  integrity  of  associated  ecosystems; 
identify  at  the  project  level  filter  strip  requirements 
adjacent  to  streams  to  reduce  sediment  delivery 
from  roads  and  other  major  surface  disturbance; 
maintain  watershed  conditions  and  water  quality 
such  that  downstream  beneficial  uses  are  protected 
and  compliance  with  Idaho  State  standards  is 
achieved;  and  continue  the  ongoing  Forest  Soil  Re- 
source Inventory  (in  conjunction  with  the  Soil  Con- 
servation Service  and  the  University  of  Idaho). 

Affected  Area 

The  Moyer  Salt  and  Salt  Creek  Timber  Sale  area  is 
bounded  by  Woodtick  Creek  and  Moyer  Creek  on 
the  northeast  and  southwest,  respectively,  and  by 
Panther  Creek  and  Moyer  Peak  on  the  northwest 
and  southeast,  respectively  (see  Figure  1-2,  Chapter 
I).  Elevations  in  the  project  area  range  from  5,500 
feet  at  Panther  Creek  to  9,000  feet  at  Moyer  Peak. 


Ill  - 1 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Chapter  III 


Existing  Condition 

The  landtypes  of  the  analysis  area  were  mapped 
during  Order  3 Landtype  Surveys  performed  in  the 
1970’s  and  field  updated  in  1990  (Landtype  survey, 
Project  File).  Landforms  in  the  analysis  area  are 
formed  from  quartzite  parent  material;  their  distribu- 
tion is  shown  on  the  landtype  map  (Figure  111-1) 
(Salmon  National  Forest,  1978)  and  briefly  de- 
scribed in  Table  111-1.  A complete  description  of 
each  landtype  is  located  in  Appendix  C. 

An  Order  3 Soil  Survey  of  the  analysis  area  by  a 
Salmon  National  Forest  soil  scientist  was  completed 
for  the  analysis  area  in  1981  (Soil  Survey  Report, 


Project  File).  Soil  parent  material  has  been  mapped 
as  quartzite  but  is  actually  phyllite,  a type  of  meta- 
morphosed quartzite  (U.S.F.S.,  1981).  The  rocks 
consist  of  light  gray  to  greenish-gray  laminated 
siltite,  argillite,  and  thinly  bedded,  cross-laminated 
quartzite  (Connor  and  Evans,  1986).  The  phyllite  is 
foliated,  moderately  metamorphosed,  finely  tex- 
tured, and  produces  soils  that  have  a higher  clay 
and  silt  content  than  soils  formed  from  true  quartzite 
parent  material.  The  amount  of  clay  in  the  rock 
varies  throughout  the  sale  area.  In  one  area  of  high 
clay  content,  located  in  the  south  side  of  the  ridge 
between  Little  Woodtick  Creek  and  Woodtick  Creek, 
the  phyllite  contains  25  to  30  percent  clay. 


Table  811-1 : Landtypes  In  the  Moyer  Salt  Analysis  Area* 


Landtype  Number 

Description 

III  Q109 

Cryic  Ridgeiands  in  Quartzite,  Moist  Sites 

III  Ql09a 

Cryic  Ridgeiands  in  Quartzite,  Moist  to  Dry  Sites 

III  Ql09as-1 

Weakly  Dissected  Cryic  Mountain  Slopes  In  Quartzite 

III  QlQ9b 

Moderately  Dissected  Cryic  Mountain  Slopeland  in  Quartzite,  Moist  Sites 

III  Q109b-r 

Moderately  Dissected,  Rocky,  Cryic  Mountain  Slopeland  in  Quartzite 

III  Q109c 

Strongly  Dissected  Cryic  Mountain  Slopeland  in  Quartzite,  Moist  Sites 

III  Ql09d 

Cryic  Headlands  in  Quartzite,  Moist  to  Wet  Sites 

III  QllOd 

Steep  Rocky  Cirque  Headwall  in  Quartzite 

III  Qllla 

Weakly  Dissected  Glacial  Troughlands  in  Quartzite,  Moist  Sites 

III  Q1 1 1as-1 

Weakly  Dissected  Glacial  Troughlands  in  Quartzite,  Cold  and  Dry  Sites 

III  Qllla-R 

Rocky  Weakly  Dissected  Glacial  Troughlands  in  Quartzite,  Cold  and  Dry 
Sites 

III  Qllld 

Steep  Glaciated  Headlands  in  Quartzite  (up  to  20  percent  rock  outcrop) 

III  Q120a-R 

Weakly  Dissected,  Rocky  Mountain  Slopeland  in  Quartzite 

III  Q120as-1 

Weakly  Dissected  Mountain  Slopelands  in  Quartzite,  Warm  and  Dry  Sites 

III  Q120bn 

Moderately  Dissected  Mountain  Slopelands  in  Quartzite,  Cold  and  Moist 
Sites 

III  Q1 20c 

Strongly  Dissected  Mountain  Slopelands  in  Quartzite,  Cool  and  Moist 
Sites 

III  Ql20d 

Steep  Timbered  Headlands, Moist  to  Wet  Sites 

III  Q124n 

Steep  Timbered  Canyonlands  in  Quartzite 

III  0124s 

Steep  Canyonland  in  Quartzite,  Hot  and  Dry  Sites 

* Source:  Salmon  Uplands  Section  Composite  Book,  Section  III,  Landtypes,  Salmon  National  Forest,  March, 
1978. 


Ill  -2 


e/iborf 


T19N 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sale  Draft  E1S 


Chapter  ill 


Soils  in  the  analysis  area  have  been  identified 
through  soil  mapping  and  are  classified  as:  Typic 
Cryoborolls,  sandy-skeletal,  mixed  (consists  of  a 
loamy  topsoil  over  a sandy  loam  to  loamy-sand  sub- 
soil); Typic  Cryochrepts,  loamy-skeletal,  mixed  and 
Argic  Pachic  Cryoborolls,  loamy-skeletal  mixed 
(consist  of  a loam  topsoil' over  a sandy  or  clay  loam 
or  loam  subsoil).  Other  possible  soils  found  within 
the  landtypes  in  the  analysis  area  are:  Typic  Cry- 
orthents,  loamy-skeletal,  mixed;  Lithic  Cryochrepts, 
loamy-skeletal,  mixed;  Typic  Cryoborolls,  loamy- 
skeletal,  mixed;  and  Lithic  Cryoborolls, 
loamy-skeletal,  mixed  (USDA  - SCS,  1975). 

Soil  textures  throughout  the  analysis  area  are  gen- 
erally loamy  on  the  surface  (Soil  Survey,  1 977  and 
1981).  Lower  horizons  range  from  loamy  sands  to 
clay  loams,  with  loamy  sands  to  sandy  loams  pre- 
dominant. The  upper  12  inches  of  the  soil  horizon 
typically  consists  of  darkly  colored  soil,  rich  in  or- 
ganic matter,  which  grades  with  depth  to  a reddish- 
brown  or  light  brown  color  in  the  lower  horizons. 
Clay  content  in  some  subsoils  ranges  as  high  as  30 
percent.  A clay  accumulation  horizon  (Btl)  com- 
monly occurs  between  20  and  40  inches  depth,  and 
the  clay  content  below  this  horizon  decreases. 
Coarse  fragments  (gravel,  cobbles,  and  stones)  are 


common  throughout  the  soil  profiles  throughout  the 
entire  analysis  area.  Cobbles  make  up  about  35 
percent  of  the  volume  of  the  soil  profiles  that  were 
inventoried  during  soil  surveys  performed  in  the 
area  (Soil  Survey,  1 977  and  1 981).  Gravel  content  is 
highest  in  sandy  soils  with  low  clay  contents  and 
make  up  about  60  percent  of  the  volume  in  the 
samples  tested.  The  soils  are  generally  deep 
throughout  the  analysis  area,  although  rock  out- 
crops, talus  slopes,  and  shallow  soils  occur  locally. 
One  area  of  rock  outcropping  is  located  along 
Woodtick  Creek  where  the  proposed  road  (the  ex- 
tension of  F.S.  Road  1 06)  crosses  the  creek. 

Soils  throughout  the  area  are  generally  quite  stable, 
although  some  areas  of  slight  rilling  were  noted. 
This  rilling  is  probably  due  to  the  higher  sand  and 
fine  gravel  content  rather  than  clay  content.  The 
bedrock  character  of  the  project  area,  composed  of 
laminated  siltite,  argillite,  and  cross-bedded 
quartzite,  dictates  a low  natural  sediment  rate  for  the 
area. 

Parameters  of  soil  stability  and  erosion  and  mass 
wasting  potential  due  to  road  construction  or  other 
management  activities  were  estimated  during  the 
soil  survey  and  are  shown  in  Table  111-2). 


Table  SSS-2:  Soil  Erosion  and  Mass  Stability  Characteristics  in  the  Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sale  Analysis 

Area 


Erosion  Potential 

Degree 

Inherent  Erosion  Hazard 

Low  to  moderate  (high  on  steep  slopes) 

Debris  slide  potential 

Very  low  to  moderate 

Slump  hazard 

Very  low  to  low 

Surface  creep  hazard 

Very  low  to  moderate 

Potential  to  create  sediment 

Very  low  on  gently  sloping  topography,  moderate 
on  steeper  slopes 

Mass  stability  (of  cut  and  fill  slopes) 

Good;  occasional  failures  may  occur  on  steep  slopes 
or  where  groundwater  is  encountered 

Erosion  potential  (fill  slopes) 

Low,  if  revegetated 

Erosion  potential  (cut  slopes) 

Moderate  to  high  due  to  steepness  of  slopes,  shallow 
soil,  low  moisture  content,  poor  revegetation,  and 
aspect. 

III  -4 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Chapter  III 


HYDROLOGY 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives 

The  water  management  goal  is  to  maintain  water- 
shed conditions  and  water  quality  such  that  down- 
stream beneficial  uses  are  protected  and  compli- 
ance with  State  standards  is  achieved. 

Affected  Area 

The  analysis  area  for  hydrology  is  the  Woodtick 
Creek  and  Moyer  Creek  drainages.  Woodtick  Creek 
and  Moyer  Creek  are  tributaries  of  Panther  Creek. 
Salt  Creek  and  "Perm"  Creek  are  small  perennial 
streams  that  are  tributaries  of  Moyer  Creek. 

Existing  Condition 

The  Moyer  Creek  drainage  is  approximately  39.2 
mi2  with  an  average  annual  flow  of  1 9 cubic  feet  per 
second  (cfs).  The  mean  monthly  flows  in  this  stream 
vary  from  a low  of  6 cfs  during  the  fall-winter  period 
to  about  77  cfs  during  snowmelt.  The  headwaters  of 
Moyer  creek  are  in  U-shaped,  steep-sided  glaciated 
valley  bottoms.  Based  upon  past  watershed  inven- 
tories the  stream  channel  stability  in  upper  Moyer 
Creek  is  generally  good.  About  one  mile  above  the 
South  Fork  of  Moyer  Creek  the  main  Moyer  Creek 
valley  bottom  opens  up  into  a wider  flat-floored  val- 
ley. Two  unnamed  V-shaped,  high  gradient  streams 
enter  Moyer  Creek  in  this  reach.  Downstream  to 
about  Salt  Creek,  Moyer  Creek  remains  in  a gentle 
gradient,  flat-floored  valley  bottom.  In  general 
stream  channel  stability  is  good  in  this  reach.  Below 
Salt  Creek  to  the  confluence  with  Panther  Creek, 
Moyer  Creek  is  in  a moderate  gradient,  steep  sided, 
V-shaped  valley  bottom.  Stream  channel  stability  is 
generally  fair  to  good  in  this  reach.  Three  small 
parallel  drainages  enter  Moyer  Creek  within  the 
analysis  area  below  Moyer  basin.  They  include  Salt 
Creek,  Pete’s  Gulch,  and  "Perm"  Creek.  These 
drainages  are  in  very  high  gradient,  steep  sided, 
V-shaped  valley  bottoms.  Stream  channel  stability 
in  these  drainages  is  generally  good. 

The  Woodtick  Creek  drainage  is  approximately  16 
mi2  with  an  average  annual  flow  of  9 cfs.  The  mean 
monthly  flows  in  this  stream  vary  from  a fall-winter 
low  of  3 cfs  to  36  cfs  during  snowmelt.  The  headwa- 
ters of  Woodtick  Creek  are  also  in  very  high  gradi- 
ent, U-shaped  valley  bottoms.  These  valleys  were 
formed  by  glaciation  which  resulted  in  some  side 


walls  being  nearly  vertical.  Below  the  headwaters, 
the  valley  bottom  is  V-shaped  and  steep  sided. 
Stream  channel  stability  in  this  drainage  is  generally 
fair  to  good. 

Panther  Creek  and  its  tributaries  above  Blackbird 
Creek  have  been  designated  by  the  State  of  Idaho 
as  having  the  following  Designated  Water  Uses:  Do- 
mestic Water  Supply,  Agricultural  Water  Supply, 
Cold  Water  Biota,  Salmonid  Spawning,  Primary 
Contact  Recreation,  and  Secondary  Contact  Recre- 
ation. Currently  none  of  the  streams  within  the  anal- 
ysis area  are  used  as  a source  of  domestic  water. 
The  primary  existing  beneficial  water  uses  are  for 
cold  water  biota,  salmonid  spawning,  and  sec- 
ondary contact  recreation.  The  specific  standards 
for  these  designated  beneficial  uses  are  spelled  out 
in  the  Idaho  Department  of  Health  and  Welfare,  Wa- 
ter Quality  Standards  and  Wastewater  Treatment 
Requirements.  In  addition  to  the  State  Water  Quality 
Standards,  the  Salmon  National  Forest  Plan  states 
that  watershed  condition  and  water  quality  will  be 
maintained  such  that  downstream  beneficial  water 
uses  are  protected. 

Water  quality  data  was  collected  on  Moyer  Creek 
and  Woodtick  Creek  during  1992.  The  following  pa- 
rameters were  evaluated;  water  temperature,  car- 
bon dioxide,  hardness  and  alkalinity  (as  Calcium 
Carbonate),  acidity,  pH,  dissolved  oxygen,  sulfate, 
phosphate,  nitrate,  and  specific  conductivity. 

Maximum  and  minimum  stream  temperatures 
recorded  at  the  mouth  of  Woodtick  Creek  between 
June  and  October,  1992  ranged  from  36  to  61  de- 
grees Fahrenheit.  Maximum  and  minimum  stream 
temperatures  recorded  at  the  mouth  of  Moyer  Creek 
for  the  same  period  ranged  from  32  to  54  degrees 
Fahrenheit.  (See  Fish  Habitat  and  Water  Quality, 
Chapter  III). 

Dissolved  oxygen  concentrations  ranged  from  9 to 
1 1 milligrams/liter  (mg/I  same  as  parts  per  million) 
for  both  Woodtick  and  Moyer  Creeks.  These  con- 
centrations met  the  standards  for  Cold  Water  Biota 
and  Salmonid  Spawning  specified  in  the  State  of 
Idaho  Water  Quality  Standards  (IDAPA  1 6.01 .2000). 

The  pH  values  measured  ranged  from  7.5  to  8.0  for 
Woodtick  Creek  and  7.0  to  7.7  for  Moyer  Creek. 
These  values  are  within  the  desired  pH  range  of  6.5 
to  9.0  for  Cold  Water  Biota  and  Salmonid  Spawning 
(IDAPA  16.01.2000). 


Ill  - 5 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Chapter  19! 


Alkalinity  as  Calcium  Carbonate  was  in  the  range  of 
35  to  105  mg/I  on  both  streams,  while  carbonate 
hardness  ranged  between  30  and  70  mg/I.  Alkalini- 
ties  and  hardness  are  consistent  with  other  streams 
and  rivers  within  the  area. 

The  total  phosphorus  concentrations  ranged  from  0 
to  .16  mg/I  on  Moyer  Creek  and  0 to.2  mg/1  on 
Woodtick  Creek.  The  nitrate  nitrogen  concentra- 
tions were  from  0 to  .02  mg/I  on  Moyer  Creek  and 
Woodtick  Creek.  Sulfate  concentrations  ranged  be- 
tween 5.5  and  8.0  mg/I  on  both  streams.  The  nitro- 
gen and  sulfate  levels  are  well  below  the  maximum 
concentrations  for  drinking  water  standards. 

Sediment  core  sampling  on  Woodtick  Creek  in  1 992 
revealed  a mean  of  1 5% 

fines-by-depth  at  likely  spawning  sites.  This  value 
meets  the  Forest  Plan  objectives  of  less  than  20% 
fine  sediment  for  anadromous  fish  spawning  habi- 
tat. 

In  1988  the  Tick  Creek  Timber  Sale  was  harvested 
in  the  Woodtick  Creek  drainage.  Twenty  three  units 
totalling  543  acres  were  harvested  in  this  sale.  Of 
this  total,  1 2 units  totalling  252  acres  were  cut  in  the 
drainage  of  Little  Woodtick  Creek,  a small,  intermit- 
tent stream  that  is  a tributary  of  Woodtick  Creek. 
This  harvest  acreage  was  23  percent  of  the  entire 
drainage.  Post  sale  evaluation  in  the  spring  of  1991 
showed  stream  sedimentation  in  Little  Woodtick 
Creek  in  the  low-gradient  depositional  areas  of  the 
channel.  Further  evaluation  of  the  drainage  showed 
that  the  deposited  sediment  came  from  stream 
bank  and  bed  erosion.  Surface  erosion  of  the  log- 
ging units  and  roads  was  not  contributing  to  the 
sediment  deposited  in  Little  Woodtick  Creek.  The 
erosion  appears  to  have  been  caused  by  increased 
snowmelt  runoff  as  a result  of  harvesting  a signifi- 
cant portion  (23  percent)  of  the  drainage.  Though 
the  area  was  harvested  in  1988  the  runoff  in  the 
spring  of  1991  was  the  first  "near  normal"  runoff 
since  the  drainage  was  harvested. 

Streamflow  measurements  on  numerous  streams 
on  the  Forest  in  the  spring  of  1991  showed 
snowmelt  runoff  levels  near  or  at  normal.  No  bank 
erosion  similar  to  that  observed  in  Little  Woodtick 
Creek  was  observed  on  other  streams  measured  on 
the  Forest. 

Since  Little  Woodtick  Creek  is  a small  intermittent 
stream  that  does  not  support  a fishery,  the  stream 
sedimentation  observed  should  not  adversely  im- 


pact fisheries.  Woodtick  Creek,  because  of  its 
greater  flow,  should  be  able  to  transport  the  sedi- 
ment delivered  by  Little  Woodtick.  No  significant 
stream  sedimentation  is  anticipated  in  Woodtick 
Creek  as  a result  of  the  channel  erosion  in  Little 
Woodtick  Creek. 


WETLANDS 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives 

The  Forest  Plan  goals  and  objectives  for  riparian 
zones  (that  include  riparian  wetlands)  specify  that 
these  zones  shall  be  managed  in  a manner  compat- 
ible with  protection  of  water  quality  and  fisheries 
habitat.  Management  of  other  wetland  areas  such 
as  isolated  wetlands  and  wet  meadows  is  not 
specifically  addressed  in  the  Forest  Plan,  although 
the  maintenance  of  all  ecosystems  and  habitats  on 
the  Forest  is  mandated.  Management  of  wetlands 
also  falls  under  the  jurisdiction  of  the  Army  Corp  of 
Engineers  under  section  404  of  the  Clean  Water 
Act,  and  several  other  Federal  manuals  and  execu- 
tive orders  provide  further  direction. 

Affected  Area 

Wetlands  in  the  analysis  area  were  identified  within 
a corridor  encompassing  all  the  proposed  roads 
and  cutting  units.  Their  identification  was  based  up- 
on field  reviews  of  the  proposed  activities  and  aerial 
photo  identification.  A documentation  of  the  Wet- 
lands Analysis  Methodology  is  found  in  the  Project 
File. 

Existing  Condition 

Several  types  of  wetlands  are  found  in  the  analysis 
area:  1)  riparian  stringer  wetlands;  2)  isolated  wet- 
lands derived  from  springs  and  seeps;  and  3)  wet 
meadows. 

Riparian  stringer  wetlands:  The  predominate  wet- 
lands in  the  area  are  riparian  wetlands.  Approxi- 
mately 30  miles  of  riparian  stringer  wetlands  are 
located  in  the  affected  area.  These  wetlands  have 
variable  widths  ranging  from  several  feet  to  over  one 
hundred  feet.  The  predominant  wetlands  in  the  area 
are  riparian  spruce  wetlands.  These  wetlands  are 
found  adjacent  to  Woodtick  Creek  and  its  tribu- 
taries. This  wetland  type  is  characterized  by  an  En- 
glemann  spruce  ( Picea  engelmannii)  overstory.  In 


III  - 6 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Chapter  III 


addition,  aspen  ( Populus  tremuloides),  alder  (Alnus 
incana)  and/or  {A.sinuata ),  and  water  birch  ( Betula 
occidentalis)  may  be  present.  The  understory  often 
includes  red  osier  dogwood  ( Cornus  stolonifera), 
Woods  rose  ( Rosa  woodsii),  elderberry  ( Sambucus 
canadensis),  gooseberry  ( Ribes  inerme),  and  thim- 
bleberry  ( Rubus  parviflora). 

Isolated  Wetlands:  Approximately  15  acres  of  iso- 
lated wetlands  have  been  identified  in  the  area.  Be- 
cause of  the  dense  forest  canopy  in  most  of  the  area 
these  wetland  types  are  difficult  to  locate  and  the 
actual  acreage  probably  exceeds  the  15  acres  iden- 
tified by  a significant  amount.  Several  types  of  isolat- 
ed wetlands  derived  from  springs  and  seeps  are 
found  in  the  area.  One  type  is  characterized  by  an 
alder  overstory.  A low  cover  of  huckleberry  ( Vaccini - 
um  globulare)  is  often  present  along  with  honey- 
suckle ( Lonicera  involucrata).  Another  isolated  wet- 
land type  is  characterized  by  willow  ( Salixspp .)  with 
an  understory  of  sedge  ( Carex  spp.).  Both  of  these 
isolated  wetlands  types  may  also  have  a scattered 
overstory  of  aspen.  These  types  of  wetlands  are 
often  used  for  elk  wallows. 

Wet  Meadows:  Several  types  of  wet  meadows  are 
also  found  in  the  project  area.  Wet  meadows  are 
found  at  the  head  of  an  unnamed  tributary  to 
Woodtick  Creek  and  at  the  headwaters  of  Salt 
Creek.  Approximately  1 4 acres  of  wet  meadow  have 
been  identified  in  the  analysis  area.  The  vegetation 
communities  in  these  wetlands  are  dominated  by 
sedge,  marshmarigold  ( Caltha  leptosepala),  and 
smooth  woodrush  ( Luzula  glabrata). 

Wet  meadows  are  also  found  along  the  upper  Salt 
Creek  drainage.  The  predominate  vegetation  in  this 
wetland  type  is  willow  with  an  herbaceous  understo- 
ry of  sedge  and  Kentucky  bluegrass  (Poa  praten- 
sis). 

The  wetlands  found  within  the  project  area  are  rela- 
tively common.  The  kinds  of  wetlands  and  vegeta- 
tive communities  associated  with  them  are  not  re- 
stricted or  unique  to  the  area. 

Past  activites  that  have  impacted  existing  wetlands 
are  very  limited  in  the  project  area.  Road  #107 
crosses  a riparian  spruce  wetland  on  Woodtick 
Creek  and  several  other  smaller  stringer  riparian 
wetlands.  These  existing  stream  crossings  have  not 
had  any  significant  adverse  impacts  to  wetlands.  A 
jeep  trail  below  Moyer  Peak  crosses  a narrow  ripari- 


an spruce  wetland.  There  is  no  fill  or  culvert  at  this 
crossing,  consequently  the  jeep  trail  is  boggy  in  this 
location,  though  impacts  to  the  wetland  are  minor. 


FISHERIES 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives 

The  fisheries  management  goal  is  to  maintain 
aquatic  habitat  capability  at  a level  sufficient  to  meet 
state  and  federal  water  quality  and  species  produc- 
tion goals  for  both  resident  and  anadromous  fish- 
eries. Additionally,  the  Forest  Plan  states  that 
wildlife  habitat  of  sufficient  quantitiy  and  quality  shall 
be  provided  that  will  sustain  target  populations  of 
economically  important  management  indicator 
species  and  that  will  at  least  maintain  minimum  pop- 
ulations for  all  other  management  indicator  species 
(all  trout  and  anadromous  fish  are  management  in- 
dicator species). 

Affected  Streams 

The  proposed  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  analysis  area 
encompasses  portions  of  the  Woodtick  Creek  and 
Moyer  Creek  watersheds.  Within  the  Woodtick 
Creek  drainage  system  proposed  activities  have  the 
potential  to  impact  mainstem  Woodtick  Creek  and 
the  lower  reach  of  Goodluck  Creek.  Both  streams 
are  perennial  and  possess  sufficient  flow  volume 
and  aquatic  habitat  capability  to  support  substantial 
fisheries  resources.  The  analysis  area  also  encom- 
passes an  unnamed,  largely  intermittent  tributary 
stream  which  enters  Woodtick  Creek  approximately 
1.7  miles  downstream  of  the  mouth  of  Goodluck 
Creek  (Township  19  N,  Range  19  E,  Section  3)  (Fig- 
ure 11-1). 

Within  the  Moyer  Creek  drainage  the  analysis  area 
encompasses  Salt  Creek  and  an  unnamed  perenni- 
al stream  locally  known  as  "Perm*  Creek,  which  joins 
Moyer  Creek  in  Township  1 9 N,  Range  1 8 E,  Section 
24.  Salt  Creek  is  of  sufficient  size  to  provide  supple- 
mental spawning  and/or  rearing  habitat  to  fisheries 
resources  in  the  Moyer  Creek  drainage  and  may 
support  a minor  resident  population  through  its  mid 
reaches.  The  smaller  “Perm"  Creek  provides  only 
marginal  spawning  or  rearing  capabilities  in  its  low- 
ermost reach.  Specific  alternatives  also  encompass 
portions  of  the  Pete’s  Gulch  drainage,  which  is  not 
believed  to  support  fish  life. 


Ill  - 7 


Moyer  Sail  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Chapter  II! 


Resident  Fisheries 

The  mainslem  reaches  of  Woodtick  Creek  and  Moy- 
er Creek  both  support  well-established  populations 
of  resident  salmonids.  Bull  trout  (Dolly  Varden),  a 
Forest  Service  Intermountain  Region  Vertebrate 
Sensitive  Species  (VSS)  and  Idaho  Department  of 
Fish  and  Game  Species  of  Special  Concern  (SSC), 
are  known  to  be  present  in  both  streams,  along  with 
resident  populations  of  rainbow  trout  (Buram  et  al, 
1 990).  Mountain  whitefish  additionally  utilize  main- 
stem  habitats  within  Moyer  Creek  (Species  List,  Ap- 
pendix D).  Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game 
management  prescriptions  for  the  two  streams  calls 
for  a “wild  trout"  resident  fishery  supported  by  natu- 
ral production  (Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and 
Game,  1991). 

Resident  trout  production  capabilities  of  Woodtick 
Creek  and  Moyer  Creek  are  each  estimated  at  40 
pounds  of  fish  per  surface  acre  (May,  1985).  Main- 
stem  Moyer  Creek,  with  an  existing  road  paralleling 
approximately  half  its  length,  receives  significant 
fishing  pressure  during  the  summer  months.  An- 
gling opportunities  in  Woodtick  Creek,  by  contrast, 
are  accessed  only  by  foot  or  horseback  from  Pan- 
ther Creek  via  the  Woodtick  Trail,  which  diverges 
from  the  stream  below  the  analysis  area. 

Anadromous  Fisheries 

The  Woodtick  Creek  and  Moyer  Creek  drainages 
are  components  of  the  Panther  Creek  drainage  sys- 
tem, which  was  historically  a major  producer  of  both 
spring/summer  Chinook  salmon  and  summer  steel- 
head  (Reiser,  1986).  Utilization  of  Panther  Creek 
and  its  tributaries  by  anadromous  salmonids  began 
to  decline  in  the  1940s,  however,  and  has  been 
precluded  since  the  1960s  by  chemical  pollution  of 
mid  and  lower  mainstem  waters  that  is  attributable 
to  operation  of  the  Blackbird  Mine  (Reiser,  1986, 
Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game,  1 965).  Despite 
these  mainstem  water  quality  problems  Panther 
Creek  and  its  historically  utilized  tributaries,  includ- 
ing Moyer  and  Woodtick  Creeks,  continue  to  be 
regarded  as  potentially  viable  producers  of  anadro- 
mous fish  (Northwest  Power  Planning  Council, 
1988).  The  Forest  Plan  calls  for  continued  manage- 
ment directed  toward  anadromous  stocks  in 
anticipation  of  correction  of  mine  drainage  prob- 
lems and  recovery  of  mainstem  water  quality  (USDA 
Forest  Service,  1 988).  Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and 
Game  management  prescriptions  for  the  two 
streams  calls  for  a preservation  management  strat- 


egy for  anadromous  fish  stocks,  which  maintains  a 
harvest  closure  and  may  supplement  natural  re- 
cruitment with  possible  stockings  of  fry  or  finger- 
lings  (Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game,  1991). 

Anadromous  production  capability  within  the 
Woodtick  Creek  system  has  been  estimated  at 
1 ,300  steelhead  smolts  annually.  Annual  production 
capabilities  in  the  Moyer  Creek  system  have  been 
estimated  at  7,300  steelhead  smolts  and  36,700  chi- 
nook  salmon  smolts  (Northwest  Power  Planning 
Council,  1988). 


Within  the  lower  portion  of  the  analysis  area  (Town- 
ship 19  N,  Range  19  E,  Section  4),  Woodtick  Creek 
is  a moderate  gradient  B type  channel  (Rosgen, 
1 985)  with  an  average  width  greater  than  1 2 feet. 
The  stream  exhibits  a diverse  variety  of  microhabi- 
tats produced  largely  as  a result  of  an  abundance 
of  large  woody  debris  within  the  channel.  Lateral 
scour  pools  and  dammed  pools  with  water  depths 
of  up  to  three  feet  are  common  and  provide  abun- 
dant adult  rearing  habitat.  Numerous  shallow  edge- 
water  areas  and  backwater  pools  contribute  to  pro- 
vide dispersed  rearing  habitat  for  juvenile  life 
stages. 

Stream  substrates  in  this  area  are  dominated  by 
angular  quartzite  rubble,  with  smaller  gravel  accu- 
mulations behind  obstructions  which  provide  small 
pockets  of  spawning  habitat.  Clean  gravels  that  are 
relatively  free  of  fine-grained  sediment  reflect  the 
largely  undisturbed  nature  of  this  portion  of  the 
drainage.  Sediment  core  sampling  conducted  dur- 
ing the  1992  field  season  revealed  a mean  of  15.0 
percent  fines-by-depth  at  likely  steelhead  spawning 
sites.  This  level  of  substrate  fines  is  among  the  low- 
est value  recorded  for  Salmon  National  Forest 
streams,  falling  well  below  Forest  Plan  standards 
and  guidelines  of  less  than  20.0  percent  fines  for 
anadromous  fish  spawning  habitat  and  less  than 
28.7  percent  for  resident  fish  spawning  habitat.  De- 
spite a low  bank  rock  content,  excellent  streambank 
stability  is  afforded  by  a well-established  carpet  of 
mosses  extending  to  the  water’s  edge.  Stream- 
banks  show  no  evidence  of  past  ungulate  damage. 
In  this  reach,  tall  Englemann  spruce  within  the  valley 
bottom  provide  over  40  percent  midday  stream 
shading  and  up  to  75  percent  morning  and  after- 


Fish  Habitat  and  Water  Quality 
Woodtick  Creek  Drainage 


III  - 8 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Chapter  III 


noon  shading.  Minor  amounts  of  supplemental 
shade  are  provided  by  understory  vegetation. 

An  existing  60-inch  culvert  on  Road  #107  in  the 
lower  portion  of  the  analysis  area  (Township  20  N, 
Range  19  E,  Section  32)  currently  poses  a barrier  to 
upstream  anadromous  and  resident  fish  passage 
under  high  water  conditions. 

Within  Township  19  N,  Range  19  E,  Section  3,  a 
large  blowdown  event  has  removed  most  of  the  tall 
valley  bottom  spruce,  reducing  stream  shading  to 
less  than  10  percent  through  a quarter-mile-long 
reach.  Shade  canopy  in  this  area  is  provided  inter- 
mittently by  1 0 to  20  foot  tall  subalpine  fir,  with  the 
larger  accumulations  of  downfall  providing  localized 
shade  from  direct  sun. 

Above  the  blowdown  area  stream  shading  of  up  to 
70  percent  is  restored  by  a dense  spruce  canopy. 
Stream  character  and  aquatic  habitat  in  this  reach 
is  similar  to  that  in  the  lower  area,  although  average 
stream  width  is  reduced  to  approximately  six  to 
eight  feet.  Dammed  and  lateral  scour  pools  as  much 
as  two  feet  deep  are  abundant. 

Goodluck  Creek  displays  significant  channel  migra- 
tion at  its  confluence  with  Woodtick  Creek.  Braiding 
of  the  stream  due  to  flow  obstruction  by  downfall 
materials  has  resulted  in  an  undefined  channel 
mouth,  which  drops  three  vertical  feet  into  the 
Woodtick  Creek  channel.  No  pool  has  formed  at  this 
confluence,  effectively  precluding  upstream  pas- 
sage from  Woodtick  Creek  into  Goodluck  Creek 
during  low  flow  periods. 

Above  their  confluence  Woodtick  and  Goodluck 
Creeks  are  about  equal  in  size  and  character,  with 
average  stream  widths  of  approximately  five  to  six 
feet  and  abundant  debris-formed  pools  as  much  as 
one  and  one-half  feet  deep.  Substrate  materials  in 
both  streams  in  this  area  become  dominated  by 
cobbles  with  minor  amounts  of  gravel.  Within  100 
yards  of  its  mouth,  Goodluck  Creek  exhibits  a short 
but  sharp  increase  in  stream  gradient  before  once 
again  flattening  out  in  the  vicinity  of  the  proposed 
road  crossing.  Above  the  confluence  of  Goodluck 
Creek,  Woodtick  generally  retains  the  step  cascade 
and  high  gradient  riffle  characteristics  of  the  stream 
below  the  confluence,  but  displays  significant  re- 
gions of  channel  braiding  which  may  define  the  up- 
per limit  of  fish  passage. 


Maximum  and  minimum  stream  temperatures 
recorded  at  the  mouth  of  Woodtick  Creek  between 
June  and  October  1992  ranged  from  36  to  61  de- 
grees fahrenheit.  Beneficial  use  temperature  criteria 
for  Coldwater  Biota  (IDAPA  16.01. 2250, Q4.c)  was 
met  during  all  months  sampled,  and  temperature 
criteria  for  Salmonid  Spawning  (IDAPA 
16.01. 2250, 05.c)  was  met  for  the  entire  fall  spawn- 
ing and  incubation  period,  and  all  but  the  very  end 
of  the  spring  spawning  and  incubation  period  iden- 
tified for  waters  of  the  Salmon  National  Forest  (Ida- 
ho Department  of  Water  Resources,  1 975).  The  brief 
exceedence  of  Salmonid  Spawning  beneficial  use 
criteria  to  a temperature  maxima  of  61  degrees  dur- 
ing the  latter  half  of  June  is  most  likely  attributable 
to  an  unseasonable  transitory  warm  spell,  as  max- 
ima for  the  July  sampling  period  fell  back  to  50 
degrees.  pH  readings  taken  during  this  same  June 
through  October  sampling  period  ranged  between 
7.5  and  8.0,  falling  well  within  the  range  of  6.7  to  8.2 
which  encompasses  90  percent  of  the  freshwater 
areas  harboring  good  aquatic  faunas  (Leitritz  and 
Lewis,  1976),  as  well  as  within  the  pH  criteria  range 
for  both  Cold  Water  Biota  (IDAPA  16.01. 2250, 04.b) 
and  Salmonid  Spawning  (IDAPA  16.01. 2250, 05.b). 
Dissolved  oxygen  content  at  the  mouth  of  Woodtick 
Creek  also  exceeded  the  6 milligram  per  liter/90 
percent  saturation  beneficial  use  criteria  for  both 
Cold  Water  Biota  (IDAPA  16.01. 2250, 04.a)  and 
Salmonid  Spawning  (IDAPA  16.01. 2250, 05.a) 
throughout  the  sampling  period,  ranging  from  9 to 
1 1 milligrams  per  liter. 

Additional  information  on  Woodtick  Creek  water 
quality  is  presented  within  the  Chapter  III  Hydrology 
discussion. 

The  benthic  macroinvertebrate  communities  of 
Woodtick  and  Goodluck  Creeks  in  the  proposed 
sale  area  are  comprised  primarily  of  stonefly  and 
mayfly  species,  indicating  both  cold,  well  oxygenat- 
ed water  of  good  chemical  quality,  and  clean  sub- 
strates relatively  free  of  sediment  deposition.  Cad- 
disfly  species  appear  to  be  somewhat 
underepresented  in  these  streams  (Rose, 
1989-1990;  1991). 


Moyer  Creek  Drainage 

Salt  Creek  and  "Perm'  Creek  are  both  small  perenni- 
al streams  whose  fisheries  habitats  are  largely  limit- 
ed to  their  lowermost  reaches  and  where  low  gradi- 
ent gravel-bottomed  riffles  and  small  pools  provide 


III  - 9 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  ESS 


Chapter  BUI 


supplemental  spawning  and  nursery  habitat  to 
mainstem  Moyer  Creek  fish  populations.  Although 
nursery  habitats  could  be  used  by  both  resident 
and  anadromous  stocks,  spawning  habitats  in  the- 
se lower  reaches  are  more  suitable  for  resident  fish. 
Additional  minor  habitat  for  resident  fish  popula- 
tions may  occur  in  the  middle  reaches  of  Salt  Creek. 

The  existing  culverts  near  the  mouths  of  Salt  and 
"Perm”  Creeks  have  not  been  identified  as  passage 
barriers.  Spawning  and  rearing  reaches  above  the- 
se culverts  appear  to  be  more  accessible  to  the 
spring-spawning  rainbow  trout  than  to  fall- 
spawning bull  trout,  due  to  improved  passage  con- 
ditions during  the  spring  runoff  period.  Low  flow 
access  is  particularly  questionable  in  “Perm”  Creek, 
which  exhibits  significant  braiding  immediately 
above  the  culvert. 

Although  not  utilized  since  the  1960’s  by  Chinook, 
the  Moyer  Creek  drainage  has  been  identified  as 
the  most  important  historic  salmon  spawning  tribu- 
tary of  the  Panther  Creek  drainage  system  (Reiser, 
1986).  While  providing  relatively  minor  amounts  of 
supplemental  habitat  to  the  Moyer  Creek  system, 
both  Salt  Creek  and  "Perm"  Creek  serve  important 
contributory  functions  to  the  maintenance  of  water 
quality  within  the  larger  Moyer  Creek  system. 

Maximum  and  minimum  stream  temperatures 
recorded  at  the  mouth  of  Moyer  Creek  between 
June  and  October  1 992  ranged  from  32  to  54  de- 
grees fahrenheit.  Beneficial  use  temperature  criteria 
for  Coldwater  Biota  (IDAPA  1 6. 01. 2250, 04. c)  was 
met  during  all  months  sampled,  but  temperature 
criteria  for  Salmonid  Spawning  (IDAPA 
16.01. 2250, 05.c)  was  exceeded  during  both  the 
end  of  the  spring  spawning  and  incubation  period 
and  the  early  and  mid  portions  of  the  fall  spawning 
and  incubation  period  identified  for  waters  of  the 
Salmon  National  Forest  (Idaho  Department  of  Water 
Resources,  1975).  The  brief  exceedence  of 
Salmonid  Spawning  beneficial  use  temperature  cri- 
teria during  the  latter  half  of  June  is  most  likely 
attributable  to  an  unseasonable  transitory  warm 
spell,  while  the  exceedence  during  July,  August, 
and  September  reflects  the  more  open  nature  of  the 
Moyer  Creek  stream  channel,  which  exacerbated 
drought-induced  conditions  of  summer  low  flow 
warming.  pH  readings  taken  during  this  same  June 
through  October  sampling  period  ranged  between 
7.0  and  7.7,  falling  well  within  the  range  of  6.7  to  8.2 
which  encompasses  90  percent  of  the  freshwater 


areas  harboring  good  aquatic  faunas  (Leitritz  and 
Lewis,  1976),  as  well  as  within  the  pH  criteria  range 
for  both  Cold  Water  Biota  (IDAPA  16.01 .2250,04. b) 
and  Salmonid  Spawning  (IDAPA  16.01. 2250, 05.b). 
Dissolved  oxygen  content  at  the  mouth  of  Moyer 
Creek  also  exceeded  the  6 milligram  per  liter/90 
percent  saturation  beneficial  use  criteria  for  both 
Cold  Water  Biota  (IDAPA  16.01 .2250, 04. a)  and 
Salmonid  Spawning  (IDAPA  16.01. 2250, 05.a) 
throughout  the  sampling  period,  ranging  from  9 to 
1 1 milligrams  per  liter. 

Additional  information  on  Moyer  Creek  water  quality 
is  presented  within  the  Chapter  III  Hydrology  dis- 
cussion. 


BIOLOGICAL  DIVERSITY 

Existing  Environment 

Biological  diversity  has  to  do  with  the  diversity  of  life 
in  all  its  forms  and  levels  of  organization  (Hunter 
1 990).  Biological  diversity  is  not  so  much  a matter  of 
maximizing  the  total  number  of  types  of  organisms 
in  an  area,  as  it  is  maintaining  the  number  and 
variety  of  plants  and  animals  that  historically  or  per- 
haps more  correctly,  ecologically,  should  occur 
there.  Considering  the  complexity  of  natural  ecosys- 
tems it  is  obvious  that  biological  diversity  is  an  ex- 
tremely complicated  subject.  Two  issues  have  lead 
to  a concern  that  a reduction  in  biological  diversity 
has  occurred:  an  accelerated  extinction  rate  for  ani- 
mals and  plants  and  an  accompanying  decrease  in 
wildlife  and  plant  habitat  world-wide. 

Since  the  number  of  plant  and  animal  species  in- 
habiting native  habitats  is  so  great,  it  is  impossible 
to  accurately  measure  or  predict  the  effects  of  activi- 
ties on  every  species  in  an  area.  However,  one  way 
to  safe-guard  biological  diversity  is  to  identify  the 
ecosystems  that  occur  in  a landscape  and  then  to 
select  a management  scheme  that,  does  not  elimi- 
nate ecosystems  or  change  how  they  function.  The 
assumption  made  in  this  approach,  is  that  if  ecosys- 
tems are  intact,  and  vegetation  associations  are  not 
greatly  different  in  composition  or  proportions  than 
those  that  occurred  naturally  in  a landscape,  then 
the  overall  biological  diversity  of  the  area  will  not  be 
disrupted.  A second  management  approach,  which 
preserves  habitat  for  rare  species  may  also  be  nec- 
essary because  these  plants  and  animals  require 
special  habitat  management. 


Ill  - 10 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Chapter  III 


Diversity  in  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  (see  Figure 
MI-2  Landscape  Boundary  Map)  is  best  understood 
by  asking  three  different  questions:  1)  how  unique 
is  this  landscape  in  the  region;  2)  how  unique  is  it  in 
comparison  to  landscapes  elsewhere  on  the 
Salmon  National  Forest;  and  3)  how  unique  are  the 
various  landscape  components  within  the  land- 
scape? 

REGIONAL  PERSPECTIVE 

Ecosystem  is  defined  as  '...all  the  interacting  popu- 
lations of  plants,  animals  and  microorganisms  occu- 
pying an  area,  plus  their  physical  environment" 
(Hunter  1990).  The  term  has  been  applied  to  areas 
the  size  of  a rotten  log,  as  well  as,  areas  the  size  of 
continents.  In  this  document,  we  will  use  the  term  in 
both  a regional  and  a landscape  sense,  but  we 
qualify  the  term  in  each  instance. 

The  Salmon  National  Forest  is  located  within  the 
north  central  part  of  the  intermountain  west.  Due  to 
the  latitude,  landforms  and  climatic  patterns  in  the 
region,  there  is  a diversity  of  landscape  types  repre- 
sented in  this  large  ecosystem.  Even  considering 
this  variety,  the  landscapes  which  compose  the 
Salmon  National  Forest  are  similar  to  those  in  the 
rest  of  the  region  in  that  they  are  predominated  by 
mountainous  terrain  covered  largely  by  conifer  for- 
est vegetation  at  higher  elevations.  In  addition,  they 
share  similar  climatic  patterns  and  a common  his- 
toric disturbance  agent,  fire. 

Although  some  plant  and  animal  species  change 
geographically  within  the  area,  many  of  the  plant/ 
animal  communities  which  are  found  on  the  Salmon 
National  Forest  can  be  located  throughout  the  re- 
gion. The  major  difference  regionally  appears  to  be 
in  the  proportions  of  the  various  plant  communities 
(e.g.  one  area  will  have  proportionally  more  lodge- 


pole  pine  than  Douglas-fir  communities  while  the 
reverse  may  be  true,  elsewhere).  These  differences 
reflect  the  varying  aspects,  elevations  and  latitudes 
in  the  region.  As  might  be  expected  the  areas  which 
are  close  to  the  Salmon  National  Forest  are  more 
similar  ecologically  than  the  landscapes  and 
ecosystems  which  are  farther  away. 

FOREST  PERSPECTIVE 

The  Salmon  National  Forest  itself  has  a number  of 
landscapes  which  vary  ecologically  in  the  plant 
communities  which  occur  there.  Conifer  dominated 
plant  communities  are  the  most  common  on  the 
Forest  and  total  about  77%  of  the  land  area  outside 
the  FCRONR  (Frank  Church  - River  of  No  Return) 
Wilderness.  The  remainder  (23%)  is  non-forested. 

The  conifer  dominated  vegetation  associations  that 
occur  on  the  Forest  generally  fall  into  one  of  6 types. 
See  Figure  III-3  for  conifer  vegetation  types  and  their 
proportional  occurrence  on  the  Salmon  National 
Forest. 

In  addition  to  the  general  vegetation  types,  a range 
of  forest  structures  (expressed  mainly  as  ages  of  the 
dominant  trees)  are  present  for  each  of  the  forest 
community  types.  These  structural  sizes  include: 
seedlings,  saplings,  poles,  immature  (5  to  9 inches 
diameter)  and  mature  (greater  than  9 inches  diame- 
ter). 

The  rarest  animal  and  plant  species  on  the  Salmon 
National  Forest  are  those  listed  regionally  or  nation- 
ally as  Threatened,  Endangered,  Proposed  and 
Sensitive  (TEPS).  Of  the  36  "listed"  species  which 
occur  on,  or  are  suspected  to  occur  on,  the  Forest 
there  are:  5 fish  (3  Sensitive),  1 amphibian  (Sensi- 
tive), 13  mammals  and  birds  (10  Sensitive)  and  17 
plants  (all  Sensitive). 


111-11 


s,  print/ 


COBALT-JeJl^C^ER  district  i A/ 


Ou»rf??T» 


FAWN  CREEK 
LANDSCAPE 


J=r  7i»  7 1 


lOw 


R ©d  Rock 
I p«*\£* 
, 'll  Iff— 


Forney/ 


lipr/np 


• 245  \ 


T19N 


67 3 7) 


LcGcua-on 


lOwBoorC 


603*1 


PANTHER  CREEK 
^ LANDSCAPE  » 


..  MOYER  SALT 
r LANDSCAPE 


ri  lRON  LAKE 
if:  LANDSCAPE 


Q-^bprino 


'Basin 


vS  p-r  »f 


No** 


7790 


'8030: 


l/Viir'Cr 
i Loht'  i 


($pnng 


ft  »>  I ) #-  } 

•■eiackiMtn 


MORGAN  CREEK 
LANDSCAPE  ! 


0 30* 


LANDSCAPE  AREA  BOUNDARY 


■ $prin{n  .. 


MOYER  SALT  ANALYSIS  AREA 
BOUNDARY 


IADMIN1ST8RED  BV ■ 
^ SALMON  NF1 


6965 


4 WILTS 


FIGURE  III- 2 


LANDSCAPE  BOUNDARY  MAP 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Chapter  III 


TABLE  ill-3:  CONIFER  VEGETATION  TYPES 


Community  type 

% on  the 
Forest 

Douglas-fir 

20% 

Ponderosa  pine 

7% 

Lodgepole  pine 

21% 

Mixed  conifer§ 

6% 

Non-Forested  (various  habitats,  all  with  few  or  no  trees/ 
acre) 

23% 

Low  productivity  (forest  of  mixed  species) 

17% 

Other  (highly  erosive  land,  water,  etc.) 

6% 

Total 

100% 

§ subalpine  fir,  Engelmann  spruce  or  Lodgepole  pine. 

Generally,  all  of  these  conifer  forest  types  are  represented  across  the  forest. 


LANDSCAPE  PERSPECTIVE 
Community  diversity 

All  of  the  landscapes  which  occur  in  the  Salmon 
River  Mountain  chain  and  in  landscapes  in 
nearby  mountain  ranges  are  occupied  by  simi- 
lar plant  and  animal  associations.  Generally,  at 
mid-elevations  in  each  of  these  areas  Douglas- 
fir  forests  dominate  the  warm,  dry  sites  and  a 
mixture  of  lodgepole  pine  and  subalpine  fir  on 
the  cooler  sites  at  higher  elevations.  However, 
each  landscape  has  a unique  mix  of  aspects, 
soil  types  and  local  climate  which  act  to  influ- 
ence the  presence  or  absence  of  individual 
plants  or  the  proportion  and  juxtaposition  of  the 
individual  communities  represented. 

The  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  is  located  on  the 
west  side  of  the  Salmon  River  Mountains.  This 
orientation  affects  the  vegetation  on  the  land- 
scape in  two  obvious  ways.  First,  the  northeast 
exposure  reduces  the  amount  and  intensity  of 
the  sun’s  energy  received  at  most  sites  in  the 
landscape.  Second,  the  high  crest  of  the 


Salmon  River  Mountains  acts  to  “wring-out" 
moisture  from  the  predominant  western  moving 
storms,  increasing  annual  precipitation  as  you 
increase  in  elevation  within  the  landscape.  The 
overall  effect  is  a comparative  increase  in  mois- 
ture and  decrease  in  temperature  in  this  land- 
scape. Other  landscapes  located  on  the  west 
side  of  the  Salmon  River  Mountains  share  a 
similar  temperature  and  moisture  regime. 

The  result  of  these  local  environmental  condi- 
tions is  that  at  lower  elevations  non-forested 
grass/shrub  communities  occur.  Here  white- 
tailed jackrabbits,  vesper  sparrows  and  sage 
thrashers  are  residents.  As  elevations  increase 
there  is  an  accompanying  increase  in  moisture 
and  as  a result  the  mid-elevation  slopes  are 
covered  with  conifer  forest,  principally  Douglas- 
fir  trees.  Intrusions  of  grass/shrub  communities 
are  common  at  mid-slope  on  dry  south  slopes, 
but  at  higher  elevations,  these  breaks  in  conifer 
habitat  become  less  common  and  a mixture  of 
lodgepole  pine  and  subalpine  fir  predominates. 
The  conifer  forest  is  home  to  a wide  variety  of 
wildlife  species  including  deer  and  elk, 
goshawks,  three-toed  woodpeckers  and  snow- 


111  - 13 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Chapter  III 


shoe  hare.  Near  the  Taylor  Mountain  Peak  area, 
the  land  becomes  very  steep  and  rocky  and  is 
barren  except  for  patches  of  scattered  trees 
and  plants  adapted  to  high  elevations.  Animals 
like  mountain  goats,  pikas,  rosy  finches  and 
hoary  marmots  are  residents  of  this  area. 

This  juxtaposition  of  different  non-forested  and 
forested  plant  communities,  both  due  to  eleva- 
tion and  aspect,  creates  a diverse  ecological 
setting.  In  fact,  17  different  ecosystems  or 
■patches"  have  been  identified  in  the  landscape. 
Seven  of  these  patches  are  different  Douglas-fir 
communities,  4 are  mixed  conifer  (a  mix  of  sub- 
alpine  fir,  Engelmann  spruce  and/or  lodgepole 
pine)  forest  patches,  2 are  lodgepole  pine  forest 
patches,  3 non-productive  (in  a timber  sense) 
mixed  conifer  forest  patch,  one  patch  which  is 
open  water,  and  one  non-forested  ecosystem 
patch.  It  should  be  noted  that  the  "non-forested” 
patch  is  itself  composed  of  many  different  com- 


munities which  have  been  lumped  for  the  bene- 
fit of  this  discussion.  These  communities  range 
from  associations  dominated  by  big  sagebrush/ 
bluebunch  wheatgrass  to  rock  outcrops  where, 
lichens  are  the  dominant  vegetation. 

Diversity  in  plant  species  and  vegetation  struc- 
ture also  occurs  within  each  conifer  forest  asso- 
ciation in  the  landscape.  Here  communities  are 
dominated  by  one  of  four  major  conifer  types  (or 
a combination  of  several)  and  three  different 
age  structures  (see  Table  111-4:  Forested  Ecoys- 
tems).  In  fact,  the  only  age  structure  normally 
found  in  landscapes  dominated  by  conifer  com- 
munities which  is  almost  absent  in  the  Moyer 
Salt  Landscape  is  the  earliest  serai  stage  - 
seedlings  and  saplings.  In  the  existing  land- 
scape the  seedling  and  sapling  forest  structure 
is  only  represented  by  approximately  1 % of  the 
landscape  area. 


Table  III-4:  Forested  Ecosystems  For  the  Landscape  Level  * 


Community  type 

Total  acres 

% of  the  conifer 
forested  communities 

% of  the 
land- 
scape 

Mature  Douglas-fir 

4,514 

16 

12.2 

Immature  Douglas-fir 

7,991 

28 

20.3 

Pole  Douglas-fir 

163 

1 

0.4 

Seedling/sapling-DF 

24 

1 

0.2 

Mature  Mix  Conifer 

2,334 

9 

6.4 

Immature  Mix  Conifer 

4,909 

18 

13.2 

Poles  Mix  Conifer 

5,475 

20 

14.8 

Seedling/sap  Mix  Conif. 

303 

1 

0.9 

Immature  Lodgepole 

543 

2 

1.6 

Poles  Lodgepole 

1,151 

4 

3.2 

* A detailed  discussion  of  the  grasses,  forbs,  sedges,  shrubs,  and  tree  species  that  occur  in  any  of 
these  forested  plant  associations  is  contained  in  Steel  et  al.  (1981). 


Ill  - 14 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Chapter  III 


Each  community  type  (and  perhaps  structural 
stage)  has  its  own  dependant  animal  species. 
Some  species  are  found  in  many  different  habi- 
tats while  others  occur  in  specific  plant  commu- 
nities which  have  reached  certain  structural 
stages  and  are  found  nowhere  else.  Perhaps 
the  best  example  from  the  Moyer  Salt  Land- 
scape of  animals  which  use  many  different  habi- 
tats are  elk  and  deer.  These  big  game  animals 
can  be  found  in  most  any  habitat  in  the  land- 
scape since  some  communities  are  used  for 
foraging  and  others  provide  thermal  or  hiding 
cover.  Conversely,  pine  marten  and  pileated 
woodpeckers  usually  occur  only  in  mature 
spruce/fir  or  Douglas-fir  communities,  respec- 
tively. 

The  size  of  the  area  each  patch  occupies  in  the 
Moyer  Salt  Landscape  varies.  The  average  is  86 
acres  (calculated  for  both  forested  and  non- 
forested  patches)  and  the  average  forested 
patch  size  is  131  acres.  Forested  patches  for  all 
forest  community  types  range  in  size  from  ap- 
proximately 7 acres  to  2,545  acres.  There  are 
436  different  patches  in  the  Moyer  Salt  Land- 
scape. Since  the  average  patch  size  is  86  acres 
and  there  are  over  436  patches  in  the  land- 
scape it  is  apparent  that  the  landscape  is  rela- 
tively diverse. 

Unique  Habitats 

Activities  which  reduce  the  amount  of  inherently 
rare  habitats  or  ecosystems  in  a landscape  will 
reduce  landscape  biological  diversity  commen- 
surately.  Two  unique  habitats  which  are  of  spe- 
cial interest  in  the  project  area  (south  side  of 
Woodtick  Creek  and  Salt  Creek)  are  riparian 
areas  which  have  high  biological  diversity  and 
old  growth  habitats  which  are  home  to  some 
relatively  rare  wildlife  species. 

There  are  about  5,300  acres  of  old  growth  forest 
in  the  project  area  (south-side  of  Woodtick  and 
Salt  drainages.  Much  of  this  old  growth  is 
Douglas-fir  forest.  Wildlife  species  that  depend 
on  mature  to  old  growth  habitat  in  the  Moyer 
Salt  Landscape  include  red  cross-bills,  northern 
goshawks,  boreal  owls,  western  tanagers, 
pileated  woodpeckers  and  pine  martens.  In  ad- 
dition, other  species  which  are  less  restrictive  in 
their  habitat  preference,  like  elk  and  deer,  use 
old  or  mature  timber  stands  for  thermal  and 
hiding  cover  in  the  landscape. 


Wetlands  are  another  unique  habitat  found  in 
the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape.  The  wetlands  occur- 
ring in  the  landscape  are  vegetated  by  several 
different  plant  communities  including  different 
types  of  willow  and  sedge  dominated  associa- 
tions. In  addition,  these  wetlands  are  derived 
from  small  ponds  and  springs,  as  well  as,  from 
creeks  of  various  sizes.  This  influences  the 
width  and  density  of  wetland  vegetation  pro- 
duced. Even  though  wetlands  make  up  a small 
part  of  the  landscape  they  are  probably  the 
most  productive  vegetation  types  in  this  land- 
scape in  terms  of  plant  biomass  produced  and 
the  number  of  wildlife  species  which  use  them 
as  primary  habitat  and  travel  corridors.  For  an 
area  of  estimated  direct  effects  (much  smaller 
than  the  landscape)  of  proposed  roads  and  har- 
vest areas,  there  is  approximately  30  miles  of 
riparian  stringer  wetlands;  15  acres  of  isolated 
wetlands  and  14  acres  of  wet  meadows.  Wildlife 
species  that  are  restricted  to  wetlands  in  the 
Moyer  Salt  Landscape  include:  yellow  warblers, 
willow  flycatchers,  the  western  jumping  mouse, 
northern  water  shrews,  mink  and  beavers.  In 
addition,  moose  are  a resident  of  wetlands  in 
the  landscape. 

Past  timber  management  activities  have  had  lit- 
tle affect  on  existing  wetlands  in  the  area  of 
proposed  timber  activity.  Existing  Roads  #107 
crosses  a riparian  spruce  wetland  on  Woodtick 
Creek  and  several  other  smaller  stringer  ripari- 
an wetlands.  These  crossings  have  not  had  any 
serious  effects  to  wetlands.  A jeep  trail  below 
Moyer  Peak  crosses  a narrow  riparian  spruce 
wetland  and  there  is  no  bridge  or  culvert  in 
place  to  facilitate  vehicle  crossing.  Conse- 
quently, during  the  wet  season  the  jeep  trail  is 
boggy  in  this  location,  though  impacts  to  the 
wetland  are  minor. 

Wildlife 

Most  of  the  animal  and  plant  species  that  are 
known  to  occur  in  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  are 
common  to  landscapes  elsewhere  in  the  north- 
ern part  of  the  intermountain  west  (see  species 
list  in  Appendix  D and  E of  the  FEIS).  The  com- 
mon game  animals,  furbearers,  old  growth  de- 
pendent birds  and  songbirds  are  listed  in  the 
wildlife  sections  of  this  FEIS. 

A loss  in  biological  diversity  should  be  most 
evident  in  rare  animal  and  plant  species.  There 


111-15 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  E!S 


Chapter  Si! 


are  12  species  of  regionally  or  nationally  listed 
Threatened,  Endangered,  Proposed  or  Sensi- 
tive Species  known  or  suspected  to  occur  in  the 
Moyer  Salt  Landscape:  northern  Rocky  Moun- 
tain gray  wolf,  North  American  lynx,  northern 
goshawk,  wolverine,  western  big-eared  bat,  bo- 
real owl,  northern  th'ree-toed  woodpecker,  great 
gray  owl,  spotted  frog,  Lemhi  penstemon  and 
bull  and  western  cutthroat  trout.  Of  these 
species,  only  the  goshawk,  lynx  and  bull  and 
cutthroat  trout  have  been  observed  in  the  land- 
scape. Habitat  has  been  identified  for  spring 
and  summer  Chinook  salmon  and  steelhead 
trout  in  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape,  therefore, 
the  habitat  could  be  affected  by  proposed  ac- 
tions which  may  occur  in  the  landscape. 

Wolves  and  Chinook  salmon,  are  listed  under 
the  Endangered  Species  Act  as  endangered 
and  threatened,  respectively.  Both  were  once 
residents  in  the  landscape  and  although  some 
potential  exists  that  dispersing  wolves  use  the 
area  it  is  doubtful  that  either  of  these  animals 
reside  in  the  landscape  today.  The  causes  of 
decline  of  each  of  these  species  are  unrelated 
to  past  or  proposed  timber  management  in  the 
Moyer  Salt  Landscape. 


TIMBER  RESOURCES 

This  section  discusses  the  timber  resources  of 
the  analysis  area  in  terms  of:  past  timber  har- 
vest activities,  fire  history,  and  climatic  events 
that  affect  the  condition  of  the  stands  at 
present;  suitable  acres  of  timberland;  site  po- 
tential: age-class  distribution  and  condition 
classes  of  the  timber  resource;  insect  and  dis- 
ease infestations;  and  fire  management. 

PAST  ACTIONS  THAT  AFFECT  THE 
PRESENT  CONDITION 

Historic  Fire  Patterns 

Both  even-aged  and  uneven  aged  stands  occur 
throughout  the  analysis  area  in  a mosaic  pat- 
tern. The  current  age  and  diameter  distribution 
and  species  composition  result  in  part  from  the 
area’s  fire  history.  Evidence  of  fire  is  seen  in  the 
form  of  burned  snags,  stumps,  and  fire  scarred 
trees.  Additional  evidence  of  more  recent  in- 
tense fire  activity  in  the  lodgepole  pine  commu- 


nity is  seen  in  substantial  acreages  of  pole- 
sized lodgepole  pine  dominating  the  landscape 
at  the  project  level.  Less  intense  fire  levels  have 
occurred  in  the  Douglas-fir  community,  as  evi- 
denced by  fire-scarred  overstory  trees,  minimal 
amounts  of  down,  woody  debris,  and  various 
distinct  age  distributions  of  trees. 

Drought 

Forests  throughout  Idaho  have  been  experienc- 
ing drought  since  1 985.  The  effect  of  drought  on 
trees  in  the  analysis  area  has  been  to  reduce 
health  and  vigor.  Life  processes,  respiration, 
photosynthetic  products,  and  nutrient  storage 
are  all  reduced.  As  a result  of  reduced  vigor, 
resistance  to  disease  and  insect  infestation  is 
lower  and  as  a result,  insect  activity  has  in- 
creased. If  drought  conditions  persist  it  is  likely 
that  loss  of  tree  growth  and  tree  mortality  due  to 
various  insects  and  diseases  will  continue  or 
increase. 

Past  Timber  Harvest  Activity 

Previous  timber  harvest  activity  has  occurred 
within  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  analysis  area. 
Area  that  were  cut  in  the  early  1 970’s  have  been 
certified  as  fully  stocked.  Units  that  were  cut 
less  than  five  years  ago  have  not  been  certified 
yet.  Prescribed  tree  stocking  and  regeneration 
certification  is  based  on  fifth  year  stocking 
standards  established  in  the  Intermountain  Re- 
gion Reforestation  Handbook  and  the  Salmon 
National  Forest  Plan  that  are  adjusted  for  local 
conditions. 

Approximately  500  acres  within  the  analysis 
area  were  cutover  in  1 973  and  1 974  in  the  Salt 
Creek  Timber  Sale.  Within  the  Douglas-fir  com- 
munity a diameter  limit  cut  was  done  that  re- 
moved all  trees  greater  than  12  inches  DBH.  In 
1 977  approximately  250  acres  of  these  cutover 
areas  that  were  understocked  were  scarified. 
Post-sale  timber  stand  exams  were  performed 
in  1 985  and  1 990  and  the  stands  were  found  to 
be  fully  stocked  and  in  need  of  treatment  by 
timber  stand  improvement  techniques  such  as 
overstory  removal  and  thinning. 

Within  the  lodgepole  pine  community  approxi- 
mately 128  acres  were  clearcut  harvested  in 
1989  as  part  of  the  Tick  Creek  Timber  Sale. 
These  units  were  comprised  of  mixed  conifer 


III  - 16 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Chapter  III 


stands  that  occur  on  the  subalpine  fir  habitat 
type  that  are  similar  to  those  found  in  the  Moyer 
Salt  Timber  Sale  analysis  area.  Examinations  to 
determine  third  year  stocking  levels  will  be  com- 
pleted in  the  1992  field  season.  Similar  stands 
that  have  been  clearcut  on  the  Cobalt  Ranger 
District  have  been  successfully  restocked  within 
five  years.  Stocking  levels  may  be  as  high  as 
4,000  trees  per  acre. 

Insects  and  Disease 

A variety  of  forest  insects  and  diseases  are 
known  to  exist  in  the  analysis  area.  Their  pres- 
ence was  detected  during  field  exams  and  other 
site  visits  and  by  aerial  survey  conducted  by  the 
Forest  Service’s  Forest  Pest  Management  divi- 
sion. Some  of  these  insects  and  diseases  are 
causing  defoliation,  reduced  growth,  or  mortal- 
ity in  the  stands.  Others  are  present  at  levels 
that  are  not  significantly  affecting  the  growth 
and  vigor  of  forest  stands.  Still  other  insects  and 
diseases  pose  a potential  threat  to  the  stands 
unless  measures  are  taken  to  prevent  infesta- 
tion. 

Western  Spruce  Budworm  ( Choristoneura  occi- 
dental is  Freeman ):  Light  to  moderate  infestation 
by  western  spruce  budworm  has  occurred  in 
the  analysis  area.  Douglas-fir  trees  are  the  pri- 
mary hosts  for  this  insect  in  this  area,  although 
subalpine  fir  and  Engelmann  spruce  trees  are 
also  affected.  Douglas-fir  trees  that  grow  on  dry 
sites  are  more  heavily  infested.  The  western 
spruce  budworms  feeds  on  the  current  year 
needles  and  terminal  buds  of  these  trees.  It 
overwinters  in  the  overstory  and  then  drops  to 
the  understory  trees.  Because  the  younger 
trees  have  a higher  percent  of  young  needles 
than  older  trees,  the  overstory  trees  are  gener- 
ally slightly  defoliated  but  understory  hosts  are 
moderately  to  severely  defoliated.  Given  the 
present  multi-storied  structure  of  the  host 
stands,  continued  infestation  and  defoliation  is 
expected  to  result  in  reduced  growth  in  the 
overstory  and  potential  mortality  in  the  under- 
story. 

Lodgepole  Pine  Dwarf  Mistletoe  ( Arceuthobium 
americanum ):  Dwarf  mistletoe  is  a parasitic 
stem  and  needle  pest  that  affects  mostly  lodge- 
pole  pine  trees  in  the  analysis  area.  Lodgepole 
pine  dwarf  mistletoe  is  common  throughout  the 
project  area,  and  present  infection  levels  are 


moderate  to  high.  Dwarf  mistletoe  plants  cause 
stem  cankers  or  swelling  of  the  branches  and 
stems  of  host  trees.  Significant  height  and  di- 
ameter reductions  can  occur  in  heavily  infected 
areas,  especially  in  young  seedling  and  sapling 
stands.  The  most  serious  threat  occurs  when 
regeneration  is  overtopped  by  an  infected  over- 
story, and  seed  from  the  mistletoe  can  fall  on 
and  infect  the  regeneration.  Because  lodgepole 
pine  is  expected  to  be  a significant  component 
in  regenerated  stands,  the  presence  of  lodge- 
pole pine  dwarf  mistletoe  could  cause  in- 
creased mortality  and  reduced  growth  of  the 
regenerated  stands  if  not  adequately  ad- 
dressed in  silvicultural  treatments.  Clearcutting 
is  the  optimal  treatment  for  these  stands  be- 
cause no  infected  trees  would  remain  on  the 
site  to  infect  the  regenerated  trees. 

Mountain  Pine  Beetle  ( Dendroctonus  pon- 
derosae ):  The  mountain  pine  beetle  flourishes 
in  stands  of  mature  lodgepole  pine,  especially 
in  stands  where  the  average  age  is  greater  than 
eighty  years.  Within  the  lodgepole  pine  forest 
community  in  the  analysis  area,  about  98  per- 
cent of  the  stands  are  comprised  of  lodgepole 
pine  trees  that  are  more  than  80  years  old. 
Therefore,  stands  in  the  area  are  highly  suscep- 
tible to  infection.  Not  only  are  these  stands  old, 
but  they  were  previously  attacked  in  the  1 930’s, 
they  are  getting  larger  (diameters  are  again 
approaching  9 or  more  inches),  and  tree  vigor 
is  poor  due  to  age  and  dwarf  mistletoe  infection. 
Stands  in  similar  condition  are  present  in  adja- 
cent drainages,  and  if  infection  occurs  in  one 
portion  of  these  stands  it  could  spread  rapidly 
throughout  the  entire  area.  If  a mountain  pine 
beetle  attack  occurs,  mortality  may  reach  50 
percent  or  more  of  the  lodgepole  pine  stands. 
Effects  would  obvious:  mortality  would  spread 
quickly;  for  three  to  ten  years  the  foliage  would 
turn  red  as  the  trees  die;  eventually  they  would 
fall  off  and  the  forest  would  be  comprised  of 
■gray  ghost  forest".  Down  and  dead  fuel  accu- 
mulations would  build  as  the  trees  fall  to  the 
ground,  and  risk  of  a stand-replacement  fire 
would  be  high. 

A number  of  rating  systems  exist  for  evaluating 
the  susceptibility  of  lodgepole  pine  stands  to 
attack  by  mountain  pine  beetle.  According  to  a 
system  devised  by  Amman  et  al  (1977),  which 
considers  latitude,  elevation,  and  stand  age,  the 
current  rating  for  these  stands  is  moderate.  Giv- 


III  - 17 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Chapter  III 


en  the  age  and  size  conditions  of  these  stands, 
the  history  of  insect  infestations,  and  the  poor 
tree  vigor,  described  above,  it  is  reasonable  to 
assume  that  the  susceptibiliy  of  these  stands  to 
infestation  is  increasing. 

Douglas-fir  Beetle  (Dendroctonus  pseudotsug- 
ae):  Evidence  of  Doug!as-fir  bark  beetle  can  be 
found  throughout  the  project  area  in  infestation 
centers  characterized  by  isolated  clumps  of  one 
to  three  dead  or  dying  trees.  Prolonged  beetle 
activity  has  resulted  in  patches  up  to  one  acre 
in  size  of  dead  or  dying  trees.  Douglas-fir  trees 
greater  than  14  inches  DBH  and  more  than  100 
years  old  are  at  high  risk  for  bark  beetle  attack. 
At  present  Douglas-fir  stands  are  experiencing 
low  tree  vigor  and  stress  conditions  brought 
about  by  prolonged  drought;  under  these  con- 
ditions, damage  to  smaller  size  and  younger 
age  classes  of  Douglas-fir  may  occur. 


the  Forest  Plan  (Forest  Plan,  IV-37-40)  (Table 
111-5).  These  lands  were  allocated  to  timber  man- 
agement as  a result  of  Forest  Plan  suitability 
analysis  and  include: 

1)  Productive  Forest  land  where  the  technology 
is  available  that  will  ensure  that  timber  produc- 
tion will  not  result  in  irretrievable  soil  and  water- 
shed resource  damage; 

2)  Lands  where  suitable  5-year  regeneration 
can  be  assured;  and 

3)  Lands  not  withdrawn  by  legislative  action 
(wilderness  areas,  etc.)  or  not  appropriate  for 
timber  production  (riparian  areas,  old-growth 
retention  stands,  etc);  and 


Western  Balsam  Bark  Beetle  ( Dryocoetes  con- 
fusus  Swaine):  Evidence  of  western  balsam 
bark  beetle  can  be  found  in  the  project  area. 
This  pest  seems  to  prefer  subalpine  fir  that  is 
weekened  by  pathogenic  fungi  and/or  drought 
conditions.  Patches  of  ten  to  twenty  infected 
trees  were  detected  during  the  1991  aerial  de- 
tection survey.  The  trees  in  these  patches  were 
greater  than  14  inches  DBH.  and  more  than  120 
years  old.  Potential  for  increasing  activity  by  the 
insect  should  be  monitored. 

Other  insect  and  Disease  Problems:  Various 
root  and  heart  rots  are  endemic  in  the  area. 
These  conditions  affect  older  stems  and  in- 
crease susceptibility  to  windthrow,  breakage, 
and  bark  beetle  attack.  Potential  for  wider 
infestation  or  additional  damage  is  not  known. 

Suitable  Timberland 


4)  Lands  for  which  management  direction  indi- 
cates that  timber  production  is  an  appropriate 
use  of  the  area  (Management  Areas  3A-5A, 
3A-5B,  3A-5C,  4A,  4A,  5A,  5B,  5C,  and  8A). 


Table  111-5:  Timber  Classifications  of  the 
Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Analysis  Area 


Classification 

Acres 

Suitable  Timberland: 
Unharvested 
Harvested 

10,664 

628 

Unsuitable  Timberland: 

Old  Growth  Protected  * 
Non-forest  or  Unproductive 
Riparian  Areas 

1,524 

2,129 

415 

Of  the  1 5,360  acres  in  the  analysis  area,  1 1 ,292  * See  Figure  111-3  for  a map  showing  locations  of 

acres  are  in  the  suitable  timber  base  defined  in  old  growth  retention  stands. 


II!  - 18 


elibort 


T19N 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Chapter  IIS 


Site  Potential 

Habitat  types  are  useful  for  predicting  the  site 
potential  (or  estimated  yield  capabilities,  in  cu- 
bic feet  of  wood  fiber  per  acre  per  year)  of  an 
area  (Steele  et  al.,"1981).  Douglas-fir  and  sub- 
alpine  fir  habitat  types  that  would  be  harvested 
in  the  analysis  area  generally  have  site  poten- 
tials similar  to  those  shown  in  Table  III-6  (Steele 
et  al.,  1981).  While  yield  capabilities  in  the  area 
are  about  average  for  the  Forest  (40-50  cubic 
feet/acre/year),  most  stands  are  old  and  no 
longer  growing  at  a productive  rate,  and  thus 
are  producing  much  less  than  this  amount. 


Table  111-6:  Site  Potentials  for  the  Habitat 
Types  off  the  Moyer  Salt  Analysis  Area* 


Habitat  Type 

Site 

Potential* 

Douglas-fir/pinegrass 

(PSME/CARU) 

28-80** 

Subalpine  fir/pinegrass 
(ALBA/CARU) 

35-80** 

Subalpine  fir/grouse  whortleber- 
ry 

(AIBA/VASC) 

42-78** 

Subalpine  fir/sitka  alder 
(AIBA/ALSI) 

35-80** 

*from  Steele  et  al.,  1981,  Appendix  E-2 
**net  yield  capability  of  Steele  et  al.,  measured 
in  ft  of  woody  material/acre/year 


Vegetative  Age/Condltlon  Distribution 

The  current  age  distribution  of  the  timber 
stands  in  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  analysis 
area  is  shown  in  Table  111-7.  Currently  less  than 
5%  of  the  forested  areas  in  the  analysis  area  are 
in  age  class  1 or  2.  The  remaining  95%  of  the 
stands  in  the  analysis  area  are  in  age  classes  4 
and  5 (for  Douglas-fir)  and  in  3 and  4 (for  lodge- 
pole  pine).  Lodgepole  pine  stands  may  be  as 
old  as  1 20  to  1 40  years  while  Douglas-fir  stands 
may  exceed  1 60  years  old  and  be  as  old  as  21 0 
years. 

Lodgepole  pine  and  Douglas-fir  in  the  analysis 
area  would  be  considered  to  be  in  a mature 
condition  class  at  approximately  80  and  120 
years  of  age  respectively.  Thus,  about  98  per- 
cent of  the  analysis  area  is  currently  occupied 
by  only  two  condition  classes,  mature  and 
overmature/oid  growth. 

Fire,  insects,  diseases,  timber  harvesting  and 
other  natural  or  man-caused  disturbances  typi- 
cally will  alter  the  distribution  and  abundance  of 
condition  classes  in  an  area.  These  processes 
result  in  a mosaic  pattern  of  mature  forest, 
younger  forest,  openings,  and  edges.  Where 
fire  is  excluded,  however,  such  as  in  the  Moyer 
Salt  Timber  Sale  analysis  area,  the  area  will  typi- 
cally be  comprised  of  only  one  or  two  condition 
classes. 


Table  SSI-7:  Estimated  Age  Distribution  for  the  Douglas-fir  and  Lodgepole  Pine  Forest 

Communities 


Douglas-fir  Community 

Lodgepole  Pine  Community 

Age 

Percent  of  Area 

Acres 

Percent  of  Area 

Acres 

0-39  years 

12% 

500ac 

2% 

128 

ac 

40-79  years 

0 

0 

0 

0 

III  - 20 


r 


Moyer  Saif  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Chapter  III 


Age 

Percent  of  Area 

Acres 

Percent  of  Area 

Acres 

80-119  years 

0 

0 

17% 

1,500 

ac 

120-159  years 

46% 

1,892 

ac 

81% 

7,064 

ac 

160+  years 

42% 

1,732 

ac 

0 

0 

Noxious  Weeds 

Several  species  of  noxious  weeds  have  been 
spreading  throughout  the  State  of  Idaho  and 
the  Salmon  National  Forest  over  the  past  few 
decades,  causing  a variety  of  concerns  on  both 
agricultural  and  forested  lands.  Resources  on 
the  Salmon  National  Forest  lands  that  are  af- 
fected by  noxious  weeds  include  range,  wildlife 
habitat,  biological  diversity,  including  sensitive 
plants,  and  recreation.  On  agricultural  land  crop 
yields  may  be  reduced  and  rangeland  produc- 
tivity may  be  affected.  The  Salmon  National  For- 
est has  established  a weed  control  program 
that  utilizes  appricaltion  of  chemical  herbicides. 

Noxious  weeds,  in  particular  knapweed  (Cen- 
taurea  maculosa),  are  present  elsewhere  on  the 
Cobalt  Ranger  District.  These  weeds  can  be 
transported  by  road  building  or  timber  harvest- 
ing equipment,  animals,  private  vehicles  and  on 
clothing.  There  are  currently  no  known  infesta- 
tions of  knapweed  in  the  analysis  area. 


WILDLIFE  RESOURCE 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives 

Wildlife  management  direction  includes  provid- 
ing habitat  of  sufficient  quantity  and  quality  to 
sustain  target  populations  of  economically  im- 
portant management  indicator  species  and  to 
at  least  maintain  minimum  viable  populations  of 
all  other  management  indicator  species;  im- 
prove elk  habitat  to  achieve  a moderate  in- 
crease over  current  (1988)  population  levels 
and  to  provide  diverse  habitat  and  elk  security; 
and  to  enhance  fisheries  habitat. 


Affected  Area 

The  area  in  which  wildlife  species  would  be  di- 
rectly affected  by  this  proposal  includes  ap- 
proximately 1 1 square  miles  of  habitat  located 
north  and  west  of  Moyer  Peak  in  the  Woodtick 
Creek  and  Moyer  Creek  drainages,  both  of 
which  are  tributaries  to  Panther  Creek  (Figure 
111-4). 

Wildlife  Species  Considered 

Wildlife  species  that  occur  in  the  analysis  area 
or  whose  habitat  exists  in  the  analysis  area  but 
have  not  been  sighted  to  date  are  shown  on  the 
species  list  in  Appendix  D.  Wildlife  species  con- 
sidered in  detail  in  this  analysis  include  those 
non-Threatened,  Endangered  and  Sensitive 
Species  identified  by  the  public  and  other  agen- 
cies during  the  scoping  process  (elk  and  mule 
deer)  and/or  species  that  are  listed  as  "Manage- 
ment Indicator  Species"  in  the  Forest  Plan.  A 
Management  Indicator  Species  (MIS)  is  a 
wildlife  species  selected  to  reflect  effects  of 
management  activities  on  the  animal  commu- 
nity, and  its  condition  can  therefore  be  used  as 
an  indicator  to  assess  the  impacts  of  manage- 
ment action  on  a particular  area.  Federally  listed 
Threatened  and  Endangered  species,  those 
species  listed  on  the  Forest  Service  Intermoun- 
tain Region  Vertebrate  Sensitive  Species  List, 
and  those  species  identified  as  "Species  of  Spe- 
cial Concern"  by  the  Conservation  Data  Center 
are  discussed  in  the  "Threatened,  Endangered 
and  Sensitive  Species"  section  that  follows. 

Big  Game  (Ungulates) 

Ungulates  that  occur  within  the  analysis  area 
include  elk,  mule  deer  and  mountain  goats.  Of 
these  species,  elk  and  mule  deer  are  most 


III  - 21 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Chapter  111 


abundant  and  occur  throughout  the  entire  area. 
The  forested/nonforested  edges  of  forested 
stringers  separated  by  openings  and  the  patch- 
es of  aspen  trees  on  the  Moyer  Creek  face  and 
in  Salt  Creek  are  used  as  calving,  fawning  and 
nursery  areas  by  elk  and  mule  deer.  Mountain 
goats  can  be  found  in  the  upper  elevations  of 
the  Woodtick  Creek  and  Moyer  Creek 
drainages.  Within  this  analysis  area  they  are 
commonly  observed  on  large  rock  outcrops  in 
the  Woodtick  Creek  drainage  near  its  conflu- 
ence with  Goodluck  Creek.  Goats  winter  in  the 
steep,  rough  mountain  mahogany  stand  in  that 
portion  of  the  Woodtick  Creek  drainage. 

Approximately  half  of  the  analysis  area  has 
been  mapped  as  key  elk  summer  range  (KESR) 
(Figure  111-4);  however,  the  entire  area  receives 
heavy  spring,  summer  and  fall  elk  and  mule 
deer  use.  Most  of  these  animals  move  down  the 
Woodtick  and  Moyer  Creek  drainages  and/or 
down  Panther  Creek  to  winter.  Limited  numbers 
of  both  species  winter  within  the  analysis  area, 
especially  in  the  western  portion  around  Salt 
Creek  and  Pete’s  Gulch.  Elk  winter  range  also 
occurs  on  the  lower  elevations  of  the  Moyer 
Creek  face  and  in  the  Salt  Creek  tributary  to 
Moyer  Creek. 

From  a big  game  habitat  perspective,  the  habi- 
tats present  in  the  analysis  area  are  very  di- 
verse. Forested  lands  below  approximately 
7500  feet  elevation  are  composed  primarily  of 
habitat  types  in  the  Douglas-fir  (PSME)  series 
whereas  those  in  the  higher  elevations  are  in 
the  subalpine  fir  (ABLA)  series.  The  analysis 
area  was  therefore  divided  into  two  habitat 
types,  Areas  I and  II  (Figure  111-4),  and  separate 
effects  assessments  for  elk  were  completed  for 
each  area. 

Area  I,  the  lower  elevations  along  the  Moyer 
Creek  face  (Figure  111-4),  consists  primarily  of 
Douglas-fir  timber  stands  in  the  Douglas-fir/ 
pinegrass  habitat  type,  with  minor  mixed  conifer 
(Douglas-fir,  subalpine  fir,  Englemann  spruce, 
and  lodgepole  pine)  timber  stands  in  the  sub- 
alpine fir/grouse  whortleberry  habitat  types. 
Natural  timber/nontimber  ecotones,  openings 
dominated  by  sagebrush  and  bunch  grasses, 
and  small  aspen  stands  or  clones  occur 
throughout  this  area  in  conjunction  with  blocks, 
stringers  and  islands  of  timber.  Little,  if  any,  past 
timber  harvest  has  occurred  in  this  area  and 


most  of  the  timber  stands,  particularly  the 
Douglas-fir  stands,  are  in  an  old  growth  condi- 
tion (most  trees  are  more  than  200  years  old,  a 
mixture  of  age  classes  is  present,  and  the  stand 
is  in  a natural  mature  to  overmature  state). 

The  diverse  nature  and  juxtaposition  of  the 
many  habitat  types  present  in  Area  I contribute 
to  very  high  habitat  values  for  many  wildlife 
species,  including  most  of  the  management  in- 
dicator species  (MIS).  The  stringers  and  islands 
of  timber  and  their  associated  timber/nontimber 
ecotones  give  Area  I very  high  habitat  potentials 
for  mule  deer  and  elk.  Elk  habitat  potential 
(EHP)  is  commonly  determined  by  using  a cal- 
culated coverforage  ratio  as  an  index  with  a 
40:60  ratio  being  optimum.  Although  big  game 
cover  is  present  in  pristine  amounts  and  distri- 
bution, the  coverforage  ratio  in  this  portion  of 
the  area  is  approximately  32:68  and  thus  is 
slightly  cover-limiting  and  is  below  optimum. 
The  Douglas-fir/pine  grass  (PSME/CARU)  habi- 
tat type,  abundant  in  this  area,  is  very  important 
for  elk  calving  and  deer  fawning,  and  the  area 
was  mapped  as  key  elk  summer  range  during 
the  Forest  planning  process  (Figure  III-4).  The 
small  aspen  stands  and  riparian  areas  found 
throughout  this  area  contribute  to  the  habitat 
diversity  and  receive  a disproportionate  amount 
of  use  by  both  elk  and  deer.  Mountain  goat  use 
is  confined  primarily  to  rock  outcrops  in  the 
Douglas-fir  habitat  types  and  nontimbered 
rocky  areas  dominated  by  mountain  ma- 
hogany. 

Area  II,  the  upper  elevations  generally  sur- 
rounding Moyer  Peak,  is  dominated  by  fairly 
uniform  stands  of  mixed  conifers,  including 
lodgepole  pine  and  subapline  fir  with  some  En- 
glemann spruce  in  the  more  mesic  sites.  This 
area  is  almost  entirely  within  the  subalpine  fir/ 
grouse  whortleberry  habitat  type.  Very  few  natu- 
ral openings  exist  and  habitat  diversity  is  low. 
However,  this  area  has  not  been  previously 
entered  and  timber  stands  in  old-growth  condi- 
tion are  abundant.  The  coverforage  ratio  is  ap- 
proximately 80:20  and  therefore  is  forage- 
limiting.  This  area  offers  extremely  good  big 
game  hiding  and/or  security  cover.  Wetter  sub- 
alpine fir  stands,  especially  in  the  heads  of 
drainages,  receive  heavy  summer  elk  use.  The 
drier  lodgepole  pine  and  subalpine  fir  stands  on 
major  ridgetops  receive  heavy  fall  use  by  both 
elk  and  mule  deer. 


Ill  - 22 


KEY  ELK  SUMMER 
RANGE  (KESR) 


MILES 


■T19N 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  ESS 


Chapter  SIS 


Other  Wildlife  Species 

Black  bear  and  cougar  occur  throughout  the 
area  and  utilize  all  habitat  types.  Black  bear  are 
most  commonly  associated  with  riparian  areas 
and  densely  timbered  north-facing  slopes. 
Cougar  use  depends  upon  the  seasonal  use  of 
various  habitats  by  primary  prey  species  such 
as  mule  deer,  elk  and  snowshoe  rabbits. 

Bobcats,  coyotes,  pine  marten  and  beaver  are 
common  furbearers.  Bobcats  and  coyotes  use 
al!  habitat  types.  Pine  marten  are  found  primar- 
ily in  the  mature  spruce/fir  stands  in  the  bottoms 
of  each  major  drainage  and  in  the  adjacent  ma- 
ture lodgepole  stands.  Beaver  are  found  in  both 
Woodtick  Creek  and  Moyer  Creek. 

Blue,  ruffed  and  Franklin’s  (spruce)  grouse  oc- 
cur throughout  the  area.  Ruffed  grouse  are 
most  common  along  riparian  areas,  blue 
grouse  are  most  common  in  the  Douglas-fir 
habitat  types,  and  spruce  grouse  are  found  in 
the  lodgepole  and  subalpine  fir  types. 

Cavity  nesting  and/or  old  growth  dependent 
MIS,  including  goshawks,  pine  marten,  great 
gray  owls,  pileated  woodpeckers  and  brown 
creeper,  are  found  throughout  the  analysis 
area.  Populations  of  these  species  are  high  due 
primarily  to  the  relatively  pristine  old-growth 
habitat  component.  One  goshawk  nest  has 
been  observed  in  the  Salt  Creek  drainage  but  is 
not  within  a proposed  cutting  unit  boundary  or 
near  a proposed  road. 

Other  MIS  found  in  this  area  include  vesper 
sparrows  in  sagebrush  habitats,  yellow  war- 
blers in  the  willow  communities,  ruby-crowned 
kinglets  in  the  mature  and  immature  Douglas-fir 
habitats,  yellow-bellied  sapsuckers  in  the  quak- 
ing aspen  clones,  brown  creeper  in  the  mature 
lodgepole  pine  and  subalpine  fir  stands,  and 
mountain  bluebirds  along  the  timbered/ 
nontimbered  ecotones. 


THREATENED,  ENDANGERED 
AND  SENSITIVE  SPECIES 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives 

Forest  Plan  management  goals  for  listed  and 
proposed  Threatened,  Endangered  and  Sensi- 
tive Species  is  to  manage  classified  Threat- 
ened, Endangered  and  Sensitive  Species  habi- 
tat to  maintain  or  improve  their  current  status. 
As  required  by  the  Endangered  Species  Act  of 
1 973,  a Biological  Assessment  of  listed  and  pro- 
posed threatened  or  endangered  species  of 
plants  and  terrestrial  vertebrates  was  prepared 
for  the  analysis  area  and  is  contained  in  Ap- 
pendix F. 

A Biological  Assessment  (BA)  of  the  effects  of 
the  proposed  road  construction  and  timber  har- 
vest alternatives  was  prepared  for  the  Moyer 
Salt  DEIS  (see  Moyer  Salt  DEIS,  Appendix  F). 

After  public  review  of  the  DEIS,  the  BA  was  up- 
dated to  address  three  additional  harvest  alter- 
natives. This  document  found  the  Alternative  1 
(No  Action)  to  have  "No  Effect"  on  Snake  River 
spring/summer  Chinook  salmon,  Alternatives  2, 
4,  5,  6,  and  2A  to  be  "Not  Likely  to  Adversely 
Affect"  Snake  River  spring/summer  Chinook 
salmon,  and  Alternative  3 to  be  "Likely  to  Ad- 
versely Affect"  Snake  River  spring/summer  chi- 
nook  salmon.  All  proposed  alternatives  were 
considered  to  have  "No  Effect"  on  Snake  River 
sockeye  salmon. 

Recent  agreements  between  the  Forest  Service 
and  the  National  Marine  Fisheries  Service,  how- 
ever, have  specified  both  a modification  of  BA 
formatting,  and  expansion  of  project  analysis  to 
encompass  possible  cumulative  subbasin  ef- 
fects as  well  as  direct  and  indirect  project  level 
effects.  The  final  Moyer  Salt  Biological  Assess- 
ment of  effects  to  Snake  River  spring/summer 
Chinook  and  sockeye  salmon  is,  therefore,  be- 
ing documented  within  the  Salmon  National 
Forest’s  Proposed  Activity  Review  for  the  Pan- 
ther Creek  Watershed. 

The  effects  analysis  methodology  specified  for 
the  Proposed  Activity  Review  places  a strong 
emphasis  on  risks  of  temperature  and  sedimen- 
tation effects.  As  the  original,  independent  BA 
prepared  for  the  Moyer  Salt  DEIS  and  FEIS  doc- 


III  - 24 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Chapter  Ell 


uments  included  discussions  of  these  tempera- 
ture and  sedimentation  risks,  conclusions  with- 
in the  pending  Proposed  Activity  Review  are  not 
expected  to  deviate  from  those  of  the  indepen- 
dent analysis  included  within  this  EIS. 

A Biological  Evaluation  for  Forest  Service  Re- 
gion 4 Sensitive  Species  of  plants,  terrestrial 
vertebrates,  and  aquatic  vertebrates  was  pre- 
pared and  is  included  in  Appendix  G. 

Threatened  and  Endangered  Plants 
and  Terrestrial  Vertebrates 

In  accordance  with  Section  7(c)  of  the  Endan- 
gered Species  Act  of  1973,  as  amended,  the 
U.S.  Department  of  Interior  Fish  and  Wildlife 
Service  (USFWS)  was  notified  of  the  proposed 
action.  The  original  species  list  (FWS 
1-4-91-SP-204)  which  they  provided  on  1/29/91 
did  not  include  any  listed  species.  However, 
when  this  list  was  updated  on  3/31/93,  the  En- 
dangered gray  wolf  was  added  and  a Biological 
Assessment  was  subsequently  prepared  (Ap- 
pendix F). 

As  stated  in  the  Biological  Assessment,  this 
analysis  area  offers  potential  gray  wolf  habitat 
but  no  wolves  are  known  or  suspected  to  occu- 
py the  area  at  this  time.  The  entire  area  is  includ- 
ed within  the  Central  Idaho  Wolf  Recovery  Area 
and  may  become  important  to  this  species  at 
some  point  in  the  recovery  process. 

Threatened  and  Endangered 
Aquatic  Vertebrates 

Columbia  River  spring/summer  Chinook  salmon 
have  recently  been  listed  as  "Threatened"  by  the 
National  Marine  Fisheries  Service  (Federal  Reg- 
ister, April  22,  1992;  Effective  date  May  22, 
1992).  This  species  has  historically  utilized 
mainstem  Moyer  Creek  spawning  and  rearing 
habitats  (Reiser,  1986),  but  they  died  out  in  the 
1960’s  due  to  water  quality  problems  related  to 
acid  mine  drainage. 

Sensitive  Plants 

The  current  Forest  Service  Intermountain  Re- 
gion Sensitive  Plant  Species  list  for  the  Salmon 
National  Forest  contains  12  species.  A review  of 
the  various  habitats  that  these  plants  are  found 
in,  as  well  as  a review  of  occurrence  reports, 


eliminated  all  but  one,  Penstemon  lemhiensis, 
from  the  Moyer  Salt  analysis  area  (Biological 
Evaluation,  Appendix  G). 

Penstemon  lemhiensis  occurs  in  open  sage- 
brush grasslands  and  in  the  forested  PSME/ 
AGSP,  PIPO/AGSP,  and  PSME/FEID  habitat 
types  in  gravelly,  rocky  soils  at  elevations  be- 
tween 4,200  and  8,1 00  feet.  It  has  been  found  in 
the  Panther  Creek  drainage  but  not  within  the 
proposed  project  area.  Currently  listed  as  Sen- 
sitive by  the  Intermountain  Region  of  the  Forest 
Service,  it  has  been  recommended  as  a Cate- 
gory 2 Candidate  Species  by  the  Fish  and 
Wildlife  Service. 

Sensitive  Terrestrial  Vertebrate  Species 

Eight  species  from  the  Forest  Service  Inter- 
mountain Region  Vertebrate  Sensitive  Species 
List  were  assessed  to  determine  whether  they 
are  present  or  their  habitat  is  present  in  the 
analysis  area.  Habitat  for  the  Northern  goshawk 
is  present  throughout  the  area  in  dense,  old- 
growth  conifer,  mixed  conifer/aspen,  and  aspen 
stands.  One  nest  site  is  known  to  occur  in  the 
area,  and  others  may  be  present  but  have  not 
been  sighted.  North  American  lynx  habitat  oc- 
curs throughout  the  analysis  area  in  mixed 
spruce  and  subalpine  fir  forests  near  riparian 
zones  or  openings  where  their  primary  prey,  the 
snowshoe  hare,  occurs.  Wolverine  habitat  is 
confined  to  montane  boreal  regions  with  low 
human  habitation  and  generally  occurs  at  high- 
er elevations  than  the  analysis  area.  The  west- 
ern or  Townsend’s  big-eared  bat’s  distribution 
range  includes  the  analysis  area  but  little  is 
known  about  the  suitablity  of  forests  for  their 
habitat.  Boreal  owls  nest  in  mature  or  overma- 
ture stands  within  the  subalpine  fir  habitat  types 
that  have  open  understories  and  multi-layered 
canopies.  Suitable  habitat  may  occur  in  the 
upper-elevation  portion  of  the  analysis  area. 
The  Northern  three-toed  woodpecker  generally 
occurs  in  spruce-fir  or  limber  pine-whitebark 
pine  zones  but  at  elevations  higher  than  those 
in  the  analysis  area.  Great  gray  owls  utilize 
lodgepole  pine  forest  as  well  as  subalpine  fir 
forest  and  may  occur  throughout  these  forest 
communities  in  the  analysis  area.  Spotted  frogs 
are  found  in  cold  permanent  water  and  may  be 
present  in  any  of  the  streams  in  the  analysis 
area. 


Ill  - 25 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Salle  Draft  ESS 


Chapter  SSI 


Although  habitat  for  each  of  these  species  oc- 
curs in  the  analysis  area,  only  the  Northern 
goshawk  has  actually  been  observed  in  the 
area.  A Biological  Evaluation  was  prepared  that 
assessed  the  potential  effects  of  the  proposed 
activities  on  sensitive  species  (Appendix  G); 
these  effects  are  summarized  in  Chapter  IV  of 
this  document. 

Sensitive  Aquatic  Vertebrate  Species 

Bull  trout  (Dolly  Varden),  a Forest  Service  Inter- 
mountain Region  Vertebrate  Sensitive  Species 
(VSS)  and  Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game 
Species  of  Special  Concern  (SSC),  are  known 
to  be  present  in  the  mainstem  reaches  of  both 
Woodtick  Creek  and  Moyer  Creek  (Buram  et  al, 
1990).  Habitat  for  steelhead  trout,  also  a Forest 
Service  Intermountain  Region  Vertebrate  Sensi- 
tive Species,  exists  in  both  Moyer  Creek  and 
Woodtick  Creek  but  is  not  currently  utilized  be- 
cause of  downstream  water  pollution  of  Panther 
Creek  due  to  acid  mine  drainage.  Westslope 
cutthroat  trout,  a Region  4 Sensitive  Species, 
occur  in  Panther  Creek  above  Musgrove  Creek 
but  are  not  known  to  occur  in  Moyer  or 
Woodtick  Creeks.  The  effects  of  the  proposed 
action  on  these  species  are  discussed  in  the 
Biological  Evaluation  (Appendix  G)  and  sum- 
marized in  Chapter  IV. 

ROADLESS  AREA  RESOURCE 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives 

General  direction  for  each  of  the  roadless  areas 
is  given  under  its  designated  Management  Area 
(MA)  direction.  Each  roadless  area  has  been 
divided  into  MAs  that  prescribe  a set  of  direc- 
tions or  goals  and  are  listed  in  detail  in  the 
Forest  Plan. 

Affected  Area 

The  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area  is  the  only 
inventoried  roadless  area  that  would  be  affect- 
ed by  the  alternatives  for  this  proposed  action. 
The  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area  is  part  of 
the  Salmon  River  Mountain  Range  and  is  locat- 
ed approximately  16  air  miles  southwest  of 
Salmon,  Idaho  (Figure  111-5).  The  Taylor  Moun- 
tain Roadless  Areas  has  a total  approximate 
size  of  63,220  acres.  Approximately  48,280 


acres  of  the  northern  portion  of  this  roadless 
area  are  administered  by  the  Salmon  National 
Forest  and  the  remaining  14,940  acres  are  ad- 
ministered by  the  Challis  National  Forest.  Only 
the  northern  portion  of  the  roadless  area  would 
be  affected  by  the  proposed  action. 

The  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area  is  identified 
as  Roadless  Area  Number  13-902  on  the 
Salmon  National  Forest  (formerly  RARE  II  No. 
4-502),  and  as  Roadless  Area  Number  06-902 
on  the  Challis  National  Forest  (formerly  RARE  II 
No.  4-502)  (Figure  111-5). 

The  roadless  analysis  section  for  the  Taylor 
Mountain  Roadless  Area  is  tiered  to  the  Final 
Environmental  Impact  Statement  (FEIS)  of  the 
Salmon  National  Forest  Land  and  Resource 
Management  Plan  (Appendix  C,  pg  C-20 
through  C-32,  1988). 

During  the  Forest  planning  process  the  Taylor 
Mountain  Roadless  Area  was  evaluated  for  pos- 
sible recommendation  for  inclusion  in  the  Na- 
tional Wilderness  Preservation  System  (NWPS). 
The  Regional  Forester’s  decision  in  the  Salmon 
Forest  Plan  recommended  that  the  area  not  be 
included  in  the  wilderness  system.  Appendix  C 
of  the  FEIS  for  the  Forest  Plan  contains  an 
overview  description  of  this  area,  a discussion 
of  its  wilderness  features,  an  evaluation  of  the 
various  nonwilderness  multiple-use  resources, 
an  assessment  of  the  environmental  impacts  of 
alternative  land  management  emphases,  and  a 
summary  of  the  public  comments  regarding 
whether  the  area  should  be  recommended  for 
Congressional  designation  as  part  of  the  Na- 
tional Wilderness  Preservation  System  (Forest 
Plan  FEIS,  Appendix  C,  pages  20-32). 

The  north  end  of  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Ar- 
eas is  accessible  from  Forest  Roads  #020, 
#055,  #062,  #099,  and  #107.  Foot  trails  tra- 
verse the  southern  half  of  this  portion  of  the 
roadless  area  and  provide  access  to  the  Hat 
Creek  Lakes  area  and  the  Opal  Lake  area. 
There  are  no  Forest  Service-maintained  trails  in 
the  northern  half  of  the  roadless  area. 

Existing  Condition 

The  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area  appears 
undeveloped  to  most  visitors.  Effects  of  human 
activities  are  limited  to  the  fringes  of  the  Road- 


Ill  - 26 


Moyer  Saif  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Chapter  III 


less  Area  where  Forest  roads,  jeep  trails  and 
foot  trails  are  located  and  along  the  Moyer  Peak 
jeep  trail  located  in  the  northern  portion  of  the 
roadless  area. 

Salmon  National  Forest  Plan  management  area 
prescriptions  for  the  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless 
Area  permit  timber  harvest  and  road  construc- 
tion. Approximately  40  percent  of  the  roadless 
area  is  in  management  areas  that  include  tim- 
ber management  objectives.  The  remaining  60 
percent  of  the  area  has  management  prescrip- 
tions for  semi-primitive  motorized  recreation  op- 
portunities. Timber  harvest  is  not  planned  in 
these  areas. 

The  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area  has  a con- 
figuration which  would  lend  itself  to  boundaries 
that  could  be  managed  for  its  undeveloped 
character. 

This  roadless  area  contains  country  that  is 
steep  and  rugged.  Valley  bottoms  are  narrow 
and  ridgetops  are  narrow  and  slightly  rounded. 
Generally,  the  area  is  heavily  timbered.  The  pri- 
mary tree  species  are  lodgepole  pine  and  sub- 
alpine  fir.  Spruce  occurs  on  the  wetter  sites; 
Douglas-fir  and  open  sagebrush  parks 
dominate  many  of  the  south  slopes.  Human  in- 
fluence on  the  area’s  natural  integrity  has  been 
minor. 

Extensive  stringer  meadows,  riparian  communi- 
ties, and  multi-storied  forest  complexes  in  the 
bottoms  of  all  major  drainages  provide  a series 
of  diverse  and  productive  habitats  for  a variety 
of  bird  and  mammal  species.  The  isolated  char- 
acter of  these  sites  within  the  roadless  area 
makes  them  particularly  valuable  as  summer 
and  fall  security  habitat  for  big  game  animals 
such  as  elk,  moose,  mule  deer,  black  bear,  and 
mountain  lion,  as  well  as  other  species  that  re- 
quire large  blocks  of  wildland  country  to  pros- 
per. Goshawks,  great  gray  owls,  and  upland 
game  birds  such  as  spruce  grouse  and  blue 
grouse  can  be  found  in  the  area;  trout  inhabit 
the  larger  streams. 

There  are  many  opportunities  for  primitive 
recreation  within  the  boundaries  of  the  roadless 
area,  including  hunting,  hiking  and  horseback 
riding.  Approximately  80  percent  of  current 
primitive  recreation  consists  of  elk  hunting. 
Backpacking  and  hiking  in  areas  other  than 


maintained  trails  or  alpine  ridges  is  deterred  by 
the  presence  of  thick  vegetation  and  heavy 
downfall  in  the  region. 

Motorized  recreation  is  allowed  under  current 
management  direction.  Most  of  the  motorized 
recreation  which  occurs  within  the  roadless 
area  is  centered  along  the  Moyer  Peak  jeep  trail. 

The  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area  is  not  con- 
sidered outstanding  for  solitude  opportunities 
because  of  its  relatively  small  size  and  notice- 
able human  activities  along  the  edge  of  the 
area.  This  roadless  area  does  have  the  general 
value  wherein  most  people  looking  out  from 
high  vantage  points  could  view  landscapes  with 
an  appearance  of  relatively  undisturbed  terrain. 
Roads  and  timber  harvesting  units  can  be  seen 
in  the  background  from  these  higher  elevation 
view  points  but  they  do  not  dominate  the  view 
scape.  In  the  central  portions  of  the  area,  at 
midslope,  lower  slope  and  streambottom  posi- 
tions, a person  will  experience  a greater  sense 
of  remoteness.  Foot  travel  is  slow  and  difficult  in 
these  areas  due  to  dense  vegetation  and  rough 
terrain.  In  addition  to  the  difficulty  of  travel,  sight 
distances  are  restricted,  often  ranging  from  30 
to  100  yards.  Travel  by  horseback  or  motorized 
vehicle  is  extremely  difficult  if  not  impossible  in 
most  of  this  area.  These  features  help  to  pro- 
mote a sense  of  remoteness. 

Although  much  of  the  area  in  the  Taylor  Moun- 
tain Roadless  Area  has  dense  stands  of  timber 
with  heavy  downfall,  there  are  portions  of  the 
area  with  a juxtaposition  of  meadows  and  tim- 
ber that  are  common  to  the  central-eastern  Ida- 
ho portion  of  the  Rockies.  These  are  pleasant 
and  scenic  habitats  that  would  be  enjoyed  by 
most  individuals  entering  the  area.  One  could 
imagine  that  the  Salmon  Mountains  had  this 
appearance  when  the  area  was  inhabited  by 
Native  Americans  before  European  explorers 
had  entered  this  part  of  the  world. 

The  more  open  habitats  on  some  of  the  south- 
ern aspects  give  one  a feeling  of  serenity  and 
adventure  as  one  walks  across  the  hillside,  ex- 
pecting to  see  big  game  enjoying  the  benefits  of 
meadow  and  forest  cover. 

The  specific  areas  identified  as  being  special  to 
visitors  of  this  roadless  area  are  located  in  the 
vicinity  of  the  Hat  Creek  Lakes,  Taylor  Mountain 


III  - 27 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  E1S 


Chapter  IIS 


Lookout,  Opal  Lake,  Moyer  Peak  jeep  trail  (and 
unimproved  campsites)  and  constructed  trails. 
Iron  Lake  campground  and  the  Iron  Lake  Road, 
although  not  within  the  roadless  area  boundary, 
were  also  identified  as  important  recreational 
areas. 

Iron  Lake  is  not  located  inside  the  roadless  area 
boundary  but  is  surrounded  by  the  roadless 
area.  The  Iron  Lake  Road  (Road  #020)  intrudes 
approximately  seven  miles  into  the  center  of  the 
Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area.  There  is  a de- 
veloped campground  with  8 units  located  on 
the  lake  shore.  The  29  acre  lake  provides  fishing 
and  non-motorized  boating  opportunities  for 
the  users.  The  lake,  campground  and  the  forest 
road  receive  moderate  use  in  the  summer  and 
fall  months.  The  roadless  character  surround- 
ing the  road  and  the  lake  add  to  the  sense  of 
remoteness,  apparent  natural  naturalness  and 
natural  integrity. 

The  Iron  Lake  campground  is  the  main  access 
point  for  the  Hat  Creek  Lakes.  The  Hat  Creek 
Lakes  Trailhead  (Trail  # 093)  is  located  on  the 
edge  of  the  campground,  which  also  provides 
facilities  for  horse  use.  A three  mile  hike  through 
glaciated  basins  and  across  open  ridges  will 
deliver  the  hiker  or  rider  to  a mountain  basin 
with  seven  small  lakes,  four  of  which  provide 
fishing  opportunities.  Unimproved  camp  sites 
can  be  found  around  the  shores  of  these  lakes 
where  campers  enjoy  the  forested  spruce/fir 
habitats.  The  rocky  ridges  and  peaks  of  Taylor 
Mountain  and  several  surrounding  mountains 
can  be  seen  from  forest  openings.  A visit  to  this 
basin  can  provide  the  forest  user  with  a sense 
of  satisfaction  and  contentment  in  enjoying  the 
basics  of  life.  Primitive  recreation  opportunities 
are  plentiful  in  this  area,  and  allow  the  user  to 
experience  the  abundance  of  the  areas  natural 
integrity.  Solitude  may  be  compromised  at 
times  during  the  year  when  the  recreation  use  is 
high. 


The  Moyer  Peak  jeep  trail  receives  heavy  motor- 
ized use  during  the  big  game  hunting  season. 
The  jeep  route  lies  on  top  of  a major  ridge  and 
during  dry  weather  can  be  traveled  by  a two- 
wheel  drive  vehicle.  The  topography  along  the 
jeep  trail  is  relatively  flat  and  unimproved  hunt- 
ing camps  are  established  on  many  parts  of  the 
trail.  Primitive  recreation  opportunities  are  limit- 
ed on  this  jeep  trail.  Once  the  user  leaves  the 
jeep  trail  and  travels  cross-country  the  opportu- 
nity increases  for  recreation  experiences  with  a 
high  degree  of  personal  challenge,  since  no 
maintained  trails  exist  in  this  portion  of  the  road- 
less area.  As  with  the  other  mid-slope,  lower 
slope  and  stream  bottom  positions  in  the  road- 
less area,  rough  terrain  and  dense  vegetation 
can  make  foot  travel  very  difficult. 

From  forest  openings  on  the  Moyer  ridge  and 
associated  northern  ridges  such  as  the 
Woodtick  Creek  drainage  one  can  see  evidence 
of  human  disturbance  and  hear  the  sounds  of 
heavy  equipment  and  vehicles  on  south-facing 
slopes  two  to  three  miles  north.  This  reduces 
the  opportunity  for  solitude  on  the  north  side  of 
Moyer  ridge,  and  decreases  the  apparent  natu- 
ralness of  the  landscape  north  of  Moyer  ridge. 

While  the  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area  does 
not  provide  unique  habitat  to  this  region  and  is 
not  the  only  roadless  area  in  the  vicinity,  it  is 
enjoyed  and  appreciated  by  National  Forest 
users.  In  addition,  some  Forest  Users  have  ex- 
pressed ongoing  concern  of  the  cumulative  ef- 
fect of  developing  roadless  areas. 

Additional  descriptions  of  the  Taylor  Mountain 
Roadless  Area  can  be  found  in  the  Salmon  For- 
est Plan  Environmental  Impact  Statement,  Vol- 
ume 1 , Appendix  C.  This  document  also  details 
some  of  the  past  public  comment  on  the  prefer- 
ence to  retain  these  areas  as  roadless  and  for 
their  desirability  as  wilderness. 


Ill  - 28 


FIGURE  111-5 

TAYLOR  MOUNTAIN  ROADLESS  AREA 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Chapter  ill 


VISUAL  RESOURCES 


Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives 

The  general  direction  for  the  visual  resource  is 
to  apply  the  Visual  Management  System  to  all 
National  Forest  System  lands.  Detailed  stand- 
ards and  guidelines  are  found  on  pages  IV-8 
through  IV-12  of  the  Forest  Plan. 

Affected  Area 

The  affected  area  is  the  viewshed  located  in  the 
Salt  Creek,  Moyer  Creek  and  Woodtick  Creek 
drainages. 

Existing  Condition 

Views  into  the  area  from  designated  sensitive 
travel  routes,  identified  below,  are  limited  and 
are  generally  of  the  rounded,  forested  ridge 
tops.  Views  into  the  drainage  bottoms  are  limit- 
ed. The  only  prominent  visual  feature  is  Moyer 
Peak  (9,085  ft.  elevation). 

The  overall  visual  character  of  Moyer  and  Salt 
Creeks  is  of  rounded  ridges,  deep  valleys  and 
a continuous  canopy  of  lodgepole  pine. 

Principles  and  terms  used  in  this  section  are 
taken  from  the  publication,  National  Forest 
Landscape  Management,  Volume  2,  Chapter  1 , 
The  Visual  Management  System,  USDA  Forest 
Service,  Agriculture  Handbook  462,  April  1974. 
These  terms  are  also  defined  in  the  glossary 
that  accompanies  this  document. 

The  proposal  area  is  bordered  by  three  visually 
sensitive  travel  routes:  Panther  Creek  Road 
(F.S.  Road  055)  (Sensitivity  level  1),  Moyer 
Creek  Road  (F.S.  Road  103)  (Sensitivity  level  2), 
and  the  Salmon  River  Mountain  Road  (“Ridge 
Road")  (F.S.  Road  020)  (Sensitivity  level  2).  Por- 
tions of  the  area  are  viewed  as  middleground 
and  background  from  these  routes.  The  remain- 
der of  the  area  is  not  visible  from  a designated 
travel  route.  The  variety  class  is  predominately 
Class  B (common).  These  combinations  result 
in  Visual  Quality  Objectives  of  Partial  Retention 
and  Modification  for  the  area. 


A Visual  Quality  Objective  of  Partial  Retention 
means  that  the  management  activity  may  be 
seen  by  the  casual  observer  but  the  activity 
remains  visually  subordinate  to  the  original 
characteristic  landscape.  The  following  pro- 
posed harvest  units  have  a VQO  of  Partial  Re- 
tention (see  Figures  11-1  to  11-3  for  location  of 
cutting  units):  Units  3W,  4W,  11,  18,  19,  19A, 
19B,  20,  22,  23,  25,  S5,  S6,  S7,  SI  2,  SI 3,  SI 4 
and  SI  5. 

Under  the  Modification  VQO  management  activ- 
ities may  visually  dominate  the  original  charac- 
teristic landscape,  but  the  alteration  must  bor- 
row from  naturally  established  form  and  line  to 
the  extent  and  at  such  scale  that  its  visual  char- 
acteristics are  those  of  natural  occurrences 
within  the  surrounding  character  type.  The  fol- 
lowing proposed  harvest  units  have  a VQO  of 
Modification  (see  Figures  11-1  to  11-3):  Units  1W, 
2W,  7,  8,  9,  10,  13,  14,  16,  17,  21,  26,  27,  27A, 
28,  28A,  29,  29A,  30,  S1 1 , Si  6,  Si 7 and  Si 8. 


RECREATION  RESOURCES 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives 

The  general  direction  for  recreation  is  to  provide 
a broad  spectrum  of  dispersed  recreation  op- 
portunities in  accordance  with  the  established 
Recreation  Opportunity  Spectrum  (ROS)  classi- 
fications for  the  management  area. 

Affected  Area 

The  area  affected  by  the  proposed  action  is  the 
analysis  area  defined  in  Chapter  I and  shown  on 
Figure  1-2,  and  is  located  in  the  Salt  Creek,  Moy- 
er Creek  and  Woodtick  Creek  drainages. 

Existing  Condition 

There  are  no  system  trails  in  the  area.  The  Moy- 
er Peak  jeep  trail,  located  along  the  south  edge 
of  the  proposal  area,  is  probably  the  heaviest 
used  portion  of  the  area.  This  jeep  trail  is  also 
the  probable  location  of  the  Thunder  Mountain 
Trail,  a historic  mining  trail  used  by  gold  miners 
to  reach  the  Thunder  Mountain  Mine. 


Ill  - 30 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Chapter  III 


Current  recreation  use  is  considered  light  and  is 
primarily  related  to  big  game  hunting  in  the  fall. 
The  quality  of  the  dispersed  setting  is  high. 

Current  Recreation  Opportunity  Classes  in- 
clude Roaded-Natural  Appearing,  Semi- 
primitive Motorized  and  Semi-primitive  Nonmo- 
torized. 


AIR  QUALITY 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives 

The  goal  for  air  quality  on  the  Forest  is  to  man- 
age the  Forest  lands  so  that  air  quality  will  meet 
the  National  Clean  Air  Act  and  Idaho  State  clean 
air  requirements  for  a Class  II  area.  Specific 
requirements  can  be  found  in  the  USDA  Forest 
Service/Idaho  Dept,  of  Health  and  Welfare  Divi- 
sion of  Environment  Memorandum  of  Under- 
standing (February  5,  1988);  Forest  Service 
Manual  Region  4 Supplement  No.  75  (Title  2500 
- Watershed  and  Air  Management),  April  28, 
1990;  and  FSH  2509.19  Air  Resource  Manage- 
ment Handbook,  August  26,  1987.  In  addition, 
the  National  Ambient  Air  Quality  Standard 
(NAAQS)  for  particulate  matter  (PM-10)  and  the 
Prevention  of  Significant  Deterioration  (PSD) 
Total  Suspended  Particulate  (TSP)  increment 
for  a Class  II  area  must  be  met. 

Affected  Area 

The  affected  area  for  the  air  quality  resources 
for  the  proposed  project  is  the  analysis  area 
and  the  airshed  that  surrounds  it.  The  area  that 
may  be  directly,  indirectly,  and  cumulatively  af- 
fected is  the  airshed  (above  and  downwind  of 
the  analysis  area)  where  burning  and  log  haul- 
ing would  occur.  The  local  Salmon  area  may  be 
affected  depending  on  the  burn  intensity,  time 
of  year,  inversions  and  wind  patterns. 

Existing  Condition 

All  Salmon  National  Forest  lands,  including 
wilderness  areas  and  the  proposed  timber  sale 
area,  are  in  a Class  II  airshed  as  designated  by 
the  1 977  Clean  Air  Act.  The  Class  II  designation 
allows  moderate  increases  in  new  air  pollution. 
Air  quality  in  the  analysis  area  is  generally  excel- 
lent and  meets  guidelines  established  by  Idaho 


air  quality  laws  and  the  National  Clean  Air  Act. 
Air  quality  may  be  degraded  and  minor 
amounts  of  pollutants  may  occur  from:  1)  pre- 
scribed burning  in  the  spring  and  fall  by  the 
Salmon  National  Forest  and  surrounding 
forests;  2)  fire  management  fires  burning  in  ar- 
eas north  of  the  Salmon  National  Forest;  3)  dust 
from  roads,  logging  operations,  and  mining  op- 
erations; and  4)  wildfires  during  forest  fire  sea- 
son. These  are  generally  of  short  duration,  typi- 
cally several  days  to  several  months  in  length. 

Weather  patterns  affect  the  air  quality,  causing 
degradation  when  low  pressure  areas  over 
Northern  Utah  and  Southern  Idaho  pull  sus- 
pended pollutants  from  large  metropolitan  air- 
sheds in  Utah  and  western  Idaho,  from  farms 
(dust  and  smoke)  in  eastern  Idaho,  and  from  the 
dry  deserts  (dust)  of  Nevada,  Utah  and  Idaho. 

Baseline  ambient  air  quality  data  is  collected  by 
the  Salmon  National  Forest  from  an  air  monitor- 
ing site  located  on  South  Baldy  Mountain  (ele- 
vation 9,149  ft),  located  approximately  6 air 
miles  southwest  of  Salmon,  Idaho.  The  Moyer 
Salt  timber  sale  analysis  area  is  located  approxi- 
mately 1 6 miles  southwest  of  the  air  monitoring 
site.  Data  collected  at  this  site  include  particu- 
late content  (particles  less  than  10  microns  in 
size)  (PM-10  equivalent  values)  and  air  chem- 
istry (University  of  California,  1989-1991). 

The  PM-1 0 equivalent  values  for  the  period  from 
July  1 , 1 989  thru  October  25, 1 989  averaged  7.2 
micrograms  per  cubic  meter  (ug/m3).  This  low 
value  reflects  the  generally  high  air  quality  con- 
ditions that  prevail  in  the  area.  The  highest 
PM-10  equivalent  value  (40.2  ug/m3)  was 
recorded  on  August  2,  1 989.  This  high  particu- 
late reading  was  mainly  due  to  a 890-acre 
lightning-caused  fire  burning  about  15  miles 
west  of  the  air  monitoring  site.  Visibility  at  this 
same  time  was  estimated  to  be  less  than  five 
miles.  The  lowest  PM-10  equivalent  value  (1.6 
ug/m3)  was  recorded  on  August  26th  during  a 
rainy  period. 

The  PM-1 0 equivalent  values  for  the  period  from 
July  1 8, 1 990  thru  November  1 7, 1 990  averaged 
9.5  ug/m3.  The  highest  PM-10  equivalent  value 
(22.0  ug/m3)  was  recorded  on  October  17, 
1990,  during  a prescribed  fire  on  Lake  Moun- 
tain, located  about  6-8  miles  southwest  of  the  air 
monitoring  site.  The  lowest  PM-10  equivalent 


III  - 31 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  ESS 


Chapter  III 


value  (3.0  ug/m3)  was  recorded  on  August 
1 8-22  during  a period  of  rain. 

PM-10  equivalent  values  for  period  from  July  3, 
1991  thru  October  26, 1991  averaged  12ug/m3. 
The  highest  PM-10  equivalent  value  (35.3 
ug/m3)  was  recorded  on  October  1 6, 1 991 , dur- 
ing the  Rush  Creek  Forest  Fire  in  the  Frank 
Church  River  of  No  Return  Wilderness,  near  the 
Middle  Fork  of  the  Salmon  River,  and  a forest 
fire  in  the  Selway  River  area,  both  producing 
large  amounts  of  smoke  that  accumulated  over 
the  Salmon  area.  The  lowest  PM-1 0 equivalent 
value  (2.8  ug/m3)  was  recorded  on  October  9, 
1991. 

Under  current  Idaho  State  and  Federal  guide- 
lines, air  quality  standards  are  being  met  in  the 
analysis  area. 


RANGE  RESOURCES 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives 

The  goal  for  range  resources  is  to  provide  for 
the  grazing  of  livestock;  manage  all  allotments 
to  maintain  suitable  rangelands  that  are  pres- 
ently in  satisfactory  condition,  and  to  improve 
rangelands  that  are  in  poor  or  fair  condition; 
and  to  control  noxious  weeds  as  needed  to  pro- 
tect the  value  of  other  resources  and  to  comply 
with  State  law. 

Affected  Area 

The  range  allotments  within  the  affected  area 
are  located  in  the  Panther  Creek  and  Moyer 
Creek  drainages.  The  northernmost  allotment  is 
the  Williams-Napias  Creek  C&H  allotment, 
which  extends  west  from  the  Forest  boundary  in 
the  bottom  of  Williams  Creek  to  the  ridge  divid- 
ing Panther  Creek  and  the  Salmon  River,  then 
south  along  the  ridge  road  to  China  Spring, 
then  southwest  to  Moyer  Peak,  then  northwest 
to  Panther  Creek,  then  down  Panther  Creek  to 
Fritzer  Gulch,  then  up  the  ridge  between  Fritzer 
Gulch  and  Trail  Creek  to  Jureano  Lookout,  then 
north  to  the  head  of  Pine  Creek,  then  southeast 
to  Leesburg,  then  east  to  the  ridge  dividing 
Napias  Creek  and  the  Salmon  River,  then  south 
along  this  divide  to  the  ridge  south  of  Pollard 
Canyon,  then  east  down  the  ridge  south  of 


Chipps  Creek  to  the  Forest  boundary,  then  fol- 
lowing the  Forest  boundary  to  the  point  of  ori- 
gin. Forney  C&H  allotment  adjoins  the  Williams- 
Napias  allotment  between  Moyer  Peak  and 
Panther  Creek.  The  Forney  C&H  allotment  ex- 
tends from  the  mouth  of  Moyer  Creek  up  Mus- 
grove  Creek  and  then  east  to  Quarzite  Moun- 
tain, then  south  to  the  south  fork  of  Cabin 
Creek,  then  east  to  Moyer  Peak  and  northwest 
to  the  point  of  origin. 

Existing  Condition 

Both  the  Williams-Napias  and  Forney  range  al- 
lotments are  cattle  allotments.  The  Williams- 
Napias  allotment  has  3 permittees  and  668  cat- 
tle permitted  for  a season  of  6/1 5 to  9/30.  The 
Forney  allotment  has  2 permittees:  one  permit- 
tee is  permitted  for  1 64  cattle  with  a season  of 
6/02  to  10/02  and  the  other  permittee  is  permit- 
ted for  120  cattle  from  5/28  to  11/15. 

These  range  allotments  occur  in  mostly  tim- 
bered sites  with  the  bulk  of  the  forage  produc- 
tion occurring  on  transitory  range  such  as  previ- 
ously harvested  areas  that  now  contain 
grasses,  and  in  riparian  ecosystems. 

The  range  allotments  have  some  fences,  but  the 
majority  of  the  allotment  boundaries  are  un- 
fenced. \ 


TRANSPORTATION  AND  ACCESS 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives 

The  goal  for  transportion  and  access  is  to  devel- 
op and  maintain  a Forest  transportation  system 
that  provides  a safe,  economical,  functional, 
and  environmentally  sound  access  for  manag- 
ing and  protecting  the  Forest  resources. 

Affected  Area 

The  affected  area  for  the  transportation  and  ac- 
cess is  the  analysis  area  defined  in  Chapter  I 
and  in  Figure  1-2.  This  analysis  only  discusses 
roads  that  presently  exist  in  the  analysis  area 
and  roads  that  would  be  built  under  the  different 
action  alternatives.  Transportation  routes  to 
and  from  the  analysis  area  are  not  discussed. 


Ill  - 32 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Chapter  III 


Existing  Condition 

Approximately  85  percent  of  the  analysis  area  is 
roadless  and  is  therefore  inaccessible  by 
wheeled  vehicles.  The  topography  of  much  if 
the  area  is  rugged,  with  steep-sided  cirque 
basins  and  deep  canyons.  Soils  in  the  area  are 
stable  quartzites/phyllites. 

Existing  roads  located  on  the  perimeter  of  the 
analysis  area  are  mostly  used  for  recreation  and 
consist  of  12  miles  of  maintained  road  and  5 
miles  of  primitive  jeep  trail  (F.S.  Trail  6204,  the 
Moyer  Peak  jeep  trail)  (Figure  11-1).  These  roads 
are  open  year-round  and  all  except  the  primitive 
jeep  trail  are  maintained  for  recreation  traffic. 
Because  of  the  rugged  topography  in  the  area, 
these  perimeter  roads  do  not  adequately  serve 
the  timber  resource  within  the  area.  Existing 
timber  access  roads  within  the  analysis  area 
include  12  miles  of  timber  access  road  and  ap- 
proximately 2 miles  of  old  logging  roads  that  are 
unsuitable  for  present  use.  These  roads  are  gat- 
ed and  travel  by  the  public  is  prohibited  for  all 
vehicles  year-round  for  the  purpose  of  big  game 
security  and  erosion  control  (Salmon  National 
Forest  Travel  Map,  1988). 


MINERAL  RESOURCES 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives 

The  goal  for  minerals  is  to  encourage  the  explo- 
ration and  extraction  of  leasable  and  beatable 
minerals  from  National  Forest  lands  while  main- 
taining or  improving  other  resource  values. 

Affected  Environment 

The  affected  area  for  mineral  resources  is  the 
analysis  area  defined  in  Chapter  I and  in  Figure 
1-2. 

Existing  Condition 

The  potential  for  minerals  development  was  as- 
sessed for  both  leasable  minerals  (oil,  gas  and 
coal)  and  beatable  or  hard  rock  minerals.  The 
project  area  is  located  within  the  Blackbird 
cobalt-copper  trend.  Patented  mining  claims 
are  located  about  2.5  miles  north  of  the  northern 
boundary  of  the  project  area  at  the  Blackbird 


Mine;  in  the  Sawmill  Gulch  area  less  than  one 
mile  west  of  Moyer  Creek;  and  in  the  Moyer 
Basin  area.  There  are  presently  active  mining 
claims  in  the  analysis  area,  although  no  known 
mineral  occurrences  exist  and  there  has  been 
no  mineral  production  from  the  area.  Therefore, 
the  potential  for  a beatable  mineral  discovery 
exists  but  no  deposits  occur  in  the  area  (Pers. 
Comm.,  Cobalt  Minerals  Forester,  July  17, 
1991).  The  geology  of  the  area  also  suggests  a 
low  potential  for  oil,  gas  or  coal  development. 
Mineral  development  and  associated  vegetative 
disturbance  and  road  building  may  therefore  be 
spellnably  foreseeable  future  activity  in  the 
study  area. 


CULTURAL  RESOURCES 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives 

The  Forest  Plan  goal  for  cultural  resources  is  to 
locate,  determine  the  significance  of  and,  where 
appropriate,  preserve,  protect,  and  interpret 
historic  and  archeological  sites. 

Affected  Area 

The  affected  area  for  cultural  resources  is  the 
proposed  area  of  direct  impacts  to  the  ground 
surface,  such  as  the  roads  and  cutting  units 
defined  for  each  alternative,  as  well  as  areas 
where  access  is  increased  due  to  construction 
of  new  roads. 

Existing  Condition 

The  Moyer  Salt  timber  sale  analysis  area  was 
partially  inventoried  for  cultural  resources  in 
1990  (Report  # SL-90-685).  No  cultural  re- 
sources were  found  during  that  survey,  and  cul- 
tural clearance  was  officially  recommended  for 
the  inventoried  areas.  There  are  no  known  cul- 
tural resources  located  in  or  near  the  proposed 
roads  and  cutting  units  for  Alternatives  2 and  3 
(Ref.  letter  2360,2430,  dated  May  8,  1991).  The 
inventory  for  the  proposed  roads  and  cutting 
units  for  Alternative  4 was  accepted  by  the  State 
Historic  Preservation  Office  on  8/18/92  as  "no 
effect,"  since  no  historic  properties  were  locat- 
ed. However,  due  to  recent  additions  of  cutting 
units  and  difficulties  in  correlating  mapped  with 
actual  unit  boundaries,  small  portions  of  units 


111-33 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Chapter  111 


1 9,  SI , S2,  S3,  S5,  S6,  and  S7  within  Alternative 
4 and  units  SI  2,  SI  6,  SI  5,  SI 3,  S6,  25,  26,  28 
and  30  within  Alternative  6 need  to  be  invento- 
ried. the  added  closure  of  the  spur  road  just 
west  of  Moyer  Peak  in  the  SE1/4  NW1/4  of  Sec- 
tion 1 6 will  also  need  to  be  inventoried. 

One  historic  site,  the  old  Forney  Telephone  Line 
(site  # Sl-581),  crosses  an  existing  road  in  the 
vicinity  of  Swan  Peak,  where  access  to  the  east- 
ern portion  of  the  timber  sales  may  be  routed. 
This  section  of  the  phone  line  has  been  evaluat- 
ed as  not  significant  so  it  need  not  be  avoided 
by  project-related  activities,  and  no  further  con- 
sideration need  be  given  to  it.  Should  additional 
segments  of  the  phone  line  be  discovered  else- 
where in  the  project  area,  these  would  need  to 
be  recorded  and  evaluated  on  their  own  merits. 

During  the  original  analysis,  it  was  determined 
that  the  area  appeared  to  have  a relatively  low 
probability  for  significant  cultural  resource 
properties  (Ref.  letter  2360,  2430,  dated  Jan- 
uary 31,  1991).  The  Forney  Telephone  Line  is 
not  eligible  for  the  National  Register  and  the 
Thunder  Mountain  Trail  and  Moyer  Peak  jeep 
trail  are  to  the  south  of  proposed  impacts.  The 
spur  road  which  will  be  closed  does  not  appear 
on  any  historic  Forest  maps  nor  are  there  any 
historic  mining  claims,  homesteads,  or  devel- 
oped recreation  areas  noted  in  the  Forest  Land 
Status  Atlas  that  it  would  have  service.  Since 
both  the  closure  and  proposed  units  are  on 
steep  and  rocky  ground  there  is  a very  low  po- 
tential of  effecting  a prehistoric  or  historic  Native 
American  traditional  use  site  or  archaeological 
site.  Therefore,  it  is  still  the  Forest  Archaeolo- 
gist’s opinion  that  the  road  closure  and  pro- 
posed cutting  units  that  have  not  been  invento- 
ried will  have  a low  potential  for  adverse  effect. 


ECONOMIC  EFFICIENCY 

Forest  Plan  Goals  and  Objectives 

Community  stability  is  influenced  through  out- 
puts from  Forest  lands  that  are  related  to  timber, 
grazing,  and  recreation-related  activites.  The 
Forest  Plan  states  that  timber  outputs  will  be 
provided  at  a level  which  will  allow  continuation 
of  industries  dependent  on  those  outputs  (For- 
est Plan,  111-4). 


Affected  Area 

The  area  affected  by  the  economic  efficiency  of 
the  proposed  project  includes  the  local  zone  of 
influence  of  the  Salmon  National  Forest.  This 
zone  covers  Lemhi  and  Custer  Counties  in  east- 
ern Idaho  and  Ravalli  County  in  southwestern 
Montana.  The  residents  and  communities  within 
this  three-county  area  are  influenced  and  affect- 
ed by  Salmon  National  Forest  policies  and  deci- 
sions. The  area  includes  six  small  towns:  Hamil- 
ton and  Darby,  Montana,  in  Ravalli  County; 
Challis  and  Mackay  in  Custer  County,  Idaho; 
and  Salmon  and  Leadore,  Idaho,  in  Lemhi 
County;  and  numerous  small  communities. 

Existing  Condition 

The  economic  stability  of  communities  in  the 
Forest’s  primary  zone  of  influence  was  an  im- 
portant issue  in  development  of  the  Salmon  For- 
est Plan.  Because  of  the  importance  of  this  is- 
sue, the  Forest  Service  sometimes  offers  timber 
sales  that  don’t  return  the  cost  of  selling  and 
administering  them.  Concern  has  been  raised 
that  the  proposed  sale  is  not  economically  effi- 
cient and  would  not  result  in  long-term  positive 
cash  flow.  However,  the  economic  efficiency  of 
an  alternative  is  not  the  only  criteria  used  in 
selection  of  the  preferred  alternative.  The  Multi- 
ple Use,  Sustained-Yield  Act  of  1960  mandates 
"coordinated  management  of  the  various  re- 
sources with  consideration  given  to  the  relative 
values  of  all  the  various  resources...  and  not 
necessarily  the  combination  of  reources  that 
gives  the  greatest  dollar  return  or  the  greatest 
unit  output.” 

An  economic  analysis  was  prepared  for  the 
Moyer  Salt  proposed  alternatives  using  the 
Salmon  National  Forest’s  Timber  Sale  Program 
Information  System  (TSPIRS).  Economic  analy- 
sis evaluates  the  cost  and  benefits  of  the  vari- 
ous proposed  alternatives,  including  the  no  ac- 
tion alternative,  to  allow  decision-makers  to 
consider  efficient  methods  of  achieving  objec- 
tives in  the  selection  of  an  alternative. 

Economic  efficiency  can  be  measured  using 
the  present  net  value  (PNV)  of  the  alternatives. 
This  measurement  is  calculated  using  the  MBF 
sold,  post  sale  costs,  road  costs,  bridge  costs, 
cattleguard  costs,  and  other  costs  associated 
with  the  sale. 


Ill  - 34 


Chapter  IV 


Environmental  Consequences 


Changes  Between  the  Draft  and 


Final 

IV-1 

Chapter  Review 

IV-1 

Solis  Effects 

IV-1 

Hydrology  Effects 

SV-4 

Wetlands  Effects 

Fisheries  Effects 

IV-1 4 

Effects  to  Biological  Diversity 

IV-1 9 

Vegetation  Effects 

8V-21 

Effects  to  the  Timber  Resource 

IV-24 

Effects  to  Wildlife  Resources 
Effects  to  Threatened,  Endangered, 

IV-34 

and  Sensitive  Species 

IV-40 

Effects  to  Roadless  Resources 

IV-46 

Visual  Effects 

IV-48 

Recreation  Effects 

IV-50 

Effects  to  Air  Quality 

IV-51 

Effects  to  Rang©  Resources 
Effects  to  Transportation 

SV-53 

and  Access 

SV-54 

Effects  to  Minerals 
Effects  to  Cultural 

IV-56 

Resource® 

IV-56 

Economic  Efficiency 
Potential  Conflicts  with  Plans 
and  Policies  of  Other  Juris- 

SV-5© 

dictions 

Probable  Environmental  Effects 

IV-59 

That  Cannot  be  Avoided 
Irreversible  and  Irretrievable 

IV-59 

Commitments  of  Resources 

IV-60 

Other  Required  Disclosures 

IV-60 

Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  SV 


CHAPTER  IV 

ENVIRONMENTAL  CONSEQUENCES 


CHANGES  BETWEEN  THE  DRAFT  AND  FINAL 

1 . Discussions  of  the  effects  for  three  additional 
alternatives,  Alternatives  5,  6 and  2A,  have 
been  added. 

2.  Road  density  and  results  of  sediment  yield 
modeling  discussion  was  added  to  the  Hy- 
drology section. 


CHAPTER  REVIEW 

This  chapter  discloses  the  environmental  conse- 
quences of  implementing  the  alternatives  proposed 
for  this  project.  It  describes  the  scientific  and  analyt- 
ic basis  for  the  comparisons  of  the  seven  alterna- 
tives; these  comparisons  are  summarized  in  Table 
11-2  in  this  document.  Whereas  Chapter  III  describes 
the  existing  environment  of  the  analysis  area,  this 
chapter  describes  the  probable  consequences,  or 
effects,  of  each  alternative  on  each  of  the  resources. 
The  resources  are  described  in  the  same  order  in 
Chapter  IV  as  they  are  in  Chapter  III.  Resources 
linked  to  the  issues  described  in  Chapter  I are  de- 
scribed in  detail;  other  resources  are  briefly  dis- 
cussed. All  potential  effects  are  described,  includ- 
ing direct,  indirect,  short-term,  long-term,  beneficial, 
and  adverse.  The  chapter  also  discusses  the 
cumulative,  or  combined,  effects  of  the  alternatives 
along  with  past  actions  and  reasonably  foreseeable 
future  actions.  For  this  analysis,  reasonably  forsee- 
able  future  actions  are  limited  to  those  that  would 
occur  during  the  present  Forest  planning  period  (to 
1998);  no  additional  timber  harvesting  is  scheduled 
for  the  analysis  area  for  this  time  frame,  although  TSI 
work  will  be  performed  that  may  involve  some  tree 
thinning. 


present  a reasonable  range  of  alternatives  for  imple- 
menting the  proposed  timber  sale.  Therefore,  the 
environmental  effects  vary  considerably  in  degree, 
but  not  in  kind.  The  level  of  detail  for  each  resource 
depends  on  the  character  of  that  resource  and  the 
scale  of  analysis  most  informative  or  relevant  for  the 
affected  resource.  Additional  detail  can  be  found  in 
other  documents  referenced  or  tiered  to  by  this  Fi- 
nal EIS,  in  appendices,  and  in  the  project  file. 

The  decisions  that  will  draw  upon  the  effects  analy- 
sis for  the  proposed  timber  sale  will  be  limited  to  the 
analysis  area.  The  discussion  for  most  resources 
was  limited  to  the  analysis  area,  but  the  possibility 
of  cumulative  effects  on  some  resources  promoted 
an  analysis  of  a larger  area. 


SOILS  EFFECTS 

With  implementation  of  the  management  require- 
ments and  mitigation  measures  outlined  with  the 
alternatives  in  Chapter  il  and  in  the  Forest  Plan 
standards  and  guidelines,  the  level  of  detrimental 
soil  disturbance  in  all  cutting  units  would  be  within 
Forest  Plan  standards  (Forest  Plan  IV-59  through 
61)  and  meet  the  desired  future  condition  as  direct- 
ed. Also,  long-term  soil  productivity  would  be  main- 
tained for  all  treatment  areas  except  for  road  sur- 
faces. Roads  would  affect  from  0.4  percent  to  0.8 
percent  of  the  analysis  area  (see  Table  IV-1).  Alter- 
natives 4 and  6 would  have  the  most  effect  on  the 
soil  resource  because  they  would  construct  the 
most  miles  of  road  and  harvest  the  most  timber. 
Excluding  Alternative  1,  Alternative  5 is  the  least 
affected  by  roads. 


All  action  alternatives  propose  varying  intensities  of 
timber  harvesting  and  road  construction  that 


IV  - 1 


This  section  will  discuss  the  impacts  to  soils  in  terms 
of  soil  structure  and  movement,  soil  erosion,  and 
soil  productivity. 


Moyer  SaSt  Timber  Sal©  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


EFFECTS  COMMON  TO  ALL  ACTION 
ALTERNATIVES 

Direct  effects  include  those  activities  that  commit 
the  land  to  uses  other  than  growing  vegetation  for 
extended  periods.  Roads  and  any  areas  where  soil 
compaction  has  not  been  mitigated  would  commit 


the  soil  resources  to  an  essentially  nonproductive 
condition  for  an  extended  time  (50  years  or  more). 
These  effects  would  be  reduced  by  following  the 
standards  and  guidelines  in  the  Forest  Plan  and 
through  mitigation  measures  (See  Chapter  II,  Table 
11-1).  The  number  of  acres  impacted  would  be  mini- 
mized by  using  the  roads  as  landing  areas  and 


TABLE  IV-1 : IMPACTS  TO  SOILS  BY  ALTERNATIVE 


ALT 

ALT 

ALT 

ALT 

ALT 

ALT 

ALT 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

2A 

PRE- 

FERRED 

Existing  Roads 

16.6/mi 

16.6/mi 

16.6/mi 

16.6/mi 

16.6/mi 

16.6/mi 

16.6/mi 

(mile/acres) 

57  acres 

57  acres 

57  acres 

57  acres 

57  acres 

57  acres 

57  acres 

New  Roads 

0 

16.8/mi 

14.6/mi 

17.8/mi 

1.1/mi 

17.8/mi 

16.8/mi 

(mile/acres) 

0 

62.1  ac 

55.2  ac 

66.1  ac 

4.0  ac 

66.1  ac 

62.1  ac 

Total  Soil 

Commitment  due  to 
Roads  (acres) 

57  ac 

119  ac 

111  ac 

123  ac 

61  ac 

123  ac 

119  ac 

Percent  of 

Analysis  Area  w/Total 

0.4% 

0.8% 

0.7% 

0.8% 

0.4% 

0.8% 

0.8% 

Commitment  * 

* Total  soil  resource  commitment  occurs  when  the  soil  is  committed  to  a use  other  than  growing  vegetation  for  an  extended 
period  of  time;  this  typically  occurs  in  roads,  landing  areas,  and  some  skid  trails. 


using  dedicated  skid  trails,  particularly  in  areas 
with  easily  eroded  soils. 

Soil  disturbance  associated  with  timber  harvest 
and  road  construction  can  also  cause  accelerated 
soil  erosion  and  soil  compaction.  The  rate  that 
timber  harvest  accelerates  soil  erosion  depends 
on  the  site  conditions,  the  amount  of  disturbance, 
the  rate  of  revegetation,  and  the  climatic  events 
that  occur  from  the  time  of  disturbance  until  the 
site  is  revegetated.  Generally,  accelerated  erosion 
rates  are  highest  immediately  following  soil  dis- 
turbance. Reseeding  of  cut  and  fill  slopes  would 
be  done  the  fall  of  the  year  the  roads  are  construct- 
ed or,  if  the  road  construction  is  not  complete  in 
the  fall,  it  would  be  done  in  early  winter.  Revegeta- 
tion on  fill  slopes  generally  occurs  within  1 to  2 
years,  and  erosion  rates  return  to  their  normal  lev- 
els within  2 to  3 years.  However,  revegetation  of 
the  cut  slopes  may  take  much  longer  and  vegeta- 
tion may  not  be  completely  re-established  due  to 


the  lack  of  topsoil,  steepness  of  the  slopes,  or  high 
percentages  of  bedrock.  Therefore,  long-term  ero- 
sion effects  may  occur. 

Potential  indirect  effects  to  soil  resources  include 
mass  wasting,  particularly  of  road  cuts  or  fills.  The 
triggering  of  mass  failure  is  dependent  on  a variety 
of  factors,  including  soil  type,  slope,  subsurface 
water  content,  dip  of  bedrock,  loss  and  decay  of 
tree  roots  and  other  soil-holding  capabilities  due  to 
timber  harvesting,  and  climatic  events.  All  of  the 
proposed  roads  in  the  analysis  area  would  be  con- 
structed on  stable  quartzite  soils  and  associated 
landforms.  These  soils  formed  from  quartzite 
bedrock,  locally  metamorphosed  to  phyllite,  and 
typically  have  very  good  mass  stability  (see  Chap- 
ter 111,  Soils)  and  thus  a very  low  potential  for  mass 
wasting.  Poorly  constructed  roads  can  potentially 
increase  the  risk  of  mass  failure,  and  the  potential 
increases  with  the  miles  of  road  constructed.  The 
potential  for  mass  failure  can  be  reduced  by  the 


IV  -2 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


road’s  location,  design,  and  drainage,  and 
through  management  practices  and  mitigation 
measures  such  as  those  designed  for  this  project 
(See  Chapter  II,  Table  11-1,  and  Appendix  B). 

A potential  indirect  impact  to  soil  resources  due  to 
timber  harvesting  is  soil  displacement  and  com- 
paction during  harvesting.  Skidding  of  logs  may 
displace  soil  if  the  end  is  allowed  to  drag  on  the 
ground,  and  may  also  cause  compaction  of  the 
underlying  soil.  Soil  compaction  may  also  occur  in 
landing  areas,  in  areas  where  heavy  equipment  is 
used,  and  on  road  surfaces  with  heavy  traffic.  The 
amount  of  soil  compaction  and  displacement 
would  vary  by  alternative  with  the  amount  of  timber 
harvested.  These  impacts  would  be  almost  entirely 
mitigated  through  observance  of  best  manage- 
ment practices  during  harvesting  and  by  machine 
scarification  and  other  post-harvest  management 
practices.  Helicopter  harvesting  would  alleviate 
soil  displacement  and  compaction  within  each 
harvest  unit.  Landing  site  impact  would  remain  the 
same  due  to  heavy  equipment  moving  logs  and 
hauling  trucks. 

Long-term  soil  productivity  would  not  be  affected 
by  the  proposed  activities.  Soil  productivity  is  a 
function  of  an  area’s  physical  and  climatic  environ- 
ment, which  can  be  changed  by  loss  of  soil 
through  erosion,  creep,  solifluction  and  mechani- 
cal displacement.  These  agents  can  be  minimized 
through  mitigation,  logging  unit  layout,  and  road 
location. 

Soil  long-term  productivity  is  also  related  to  soil 
chemistry  and  structure,  which  affects  the  nutrient 
cycle,  water  movement  and  the  living  biotic  com- 
ponent of  the  soil  layers.  Soil  chemistry  and  struc- 
ture are  important  and  directly  related  to  the 
amount  of  organic  matter  retained  on  a site.  Cur- 
rent research  indicates  that  large  woody  material 
should  be  left  on  the  logging  sites  after  they  are 
logged  and  treated  for  seedling  establishment 
(Harvey,  1987).  Mitigations  described  in  Chapter  II 
of  this  EIS  require  that  1 0 to  1 5 tons  of  slash  be  left 
on  the  surface  of  the  logging  site.  This  large  organ- 
ic matter  would  provide  the  basics  for  chemical 
and  structural  soil  development  in  the  short  and 
long-term  future  (Graham  et  al,  1991).  Therefore, 
all  of  the  alternatives  would  maintain  the  soil’s 
short-term  and  long-term  productivity  as  directed 
in  the  Forest  Plan. 


EFFECTS  BY  ALTERNATIVE 

Alternative  1 - No  Action 

Soil  erosion  would  continue  at  it’s  natural  rate  on 
undisturbed  land.  The  existing  Moyer  Peak  Jeep 
Road  would  continue  to  produce  soil  erosion  over 
time  with  the  continued  use  of  the  road,  but  the 
potential  to  produce  erosion  is  low  due  to  the  loca- 
tion of  the  road  on  a ridge.  Existing  timber  access 
roads  in  the  analysis  area  are  gated  and  locked, 
and  were  designed  and  built  in  accordance  with 
Forest  Plan  standards  and  guidelines.  Erosion  and 
sedimentation  from  these  roads  is  minimal,  and 
the  mass  erosion  potential  of  these  existing  roads 
is  low.  No  more  roads  would  be  built  and  no  timber 
harvesting  would  occur.  The  total  soil  commitment 
would  therefore  be  limited  to  the  57  acres  already 
committed  to  roads.  Because  no  additional  acres 
would  be  disturbed  by  timber  harvest  or  road  con- 
struction or  reconstruction,  soil  productivity  would, 
in  the  absence  of  any  wildfires  or  climatic  events, 
remain  at  its  current  level. 

Alternative  2 

The  specified  new  road  construction  of  16.8  miles 
would  commit  62.1  acres  of  soil  to  an  essentially 
nonproductive  condition,  in  addition  to  the  57 
acres  already  roaded  (Table  1V-1).  The  total  soil 
resource  commitment  for  this  alternative  would 
therefore  be  1 1 9 acres,  or  0.8  percent  of  the  analy- 
sis area. 

Alternative  3 

The  specified  new  road  construction  of  14.6  miles 
would  commit  55.2  acres  of  soil  to  an  essentially 
nonproductive  condition,  in  addition  to  the  57 
acres  already  roaded  (Table  IV-1).  The  total  soil 
resource  commitment  for  this  alternative  would 
therefore  be  1 1 1 acres,  or  0.7  percent  of  the  analy- 
sis area. 

This  alternative  would  have  the  least  amount  of 
disturbance  due  to  road  construction  of  ail  the 
action  alternatives.  However,  about  3,000  feet  of 
new  road  construction  would  occur  on  the  north 
side  of  Salt  Creek  in  landtype  Q120c,  which  is  a 
warm  to  hot  dry  south  aspect  that  receives  approx- 
imately 25  inches  of  precipitation  annually.  Be- 
cause of  the  south  aspect  of  the  area,  it  would  be 
difficult  to  rehabilitate  the  cut  and  fill  slopes.  There 
would  therefore  be  a greater  risk  of  increased  ero- 


IV -3 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


sion  on  this  portion  of  the  road  and  the  amount  of 
sediment  reaching  Sait  Creek  would  be  greater. 

Alternative  4 

The  specified  new  road  construction  of  17.8  miles 
would  commit  66.1  acres  of  soil  to  an  essentially 
nonproductive  condition,  in  addition  to  the  57 
acres  already  roaded  (Table  IV-1).  The  total  soil 
resource  commitment  for  this  alternative  would 
therefore  be  123  acres,  or  0.8  percent  of  the  analy- 
sis area. 

This  alternative  would  have  the  greatest  amount  of 
soil  disturbance  due  to  reading  of  all  of  the  action 
alternatives,  and  thus  would  have  the  greatest  po- 
tential of  increased  erosion  and  mass  failure,  and 
the  most  total  soil  resource  commitment. 

Alternative  5 

The  specified  new  road  construction  of  1.15  miles 
would  commit  5 acres  of  soil  to  an  essentially  non- 
productive condition,  in  addition  to  the  57  acres 
already  roaded  (Table  IV-1).  The  total  soil  resource 
commitment  for  this  alternative  would  therefore  be 
62  acres,  or  0.40  percent  of  the  analysis  area.  This 
alternative  would  be  the  least  amount  of  soil  dis- 
turbance due  to  raoding  of  all  the  action  alterna- 
tives, and  thus  the  least  potential  of  increased  ero- 
sion and  mass  failure,  and  the  least  total  soil 
resource  committment. 

Alternative  6 PREFERRED 

This  alternative  will  have  the  same  effects  of  soil 
impacted  and  displaced  as  Alternative  4 (see  table 
IV-1). 

Alternative  2A 

This  alternative  has  the  same  effects  of  soil  impact- 
ed and  displaced  as  alternative  2. 


CUMULATIVE  EFFECTS 

Approximately  100  acres  of  post  and  pole  sales 
and  firewood  and  house  log  salvage  would  occur 
after  timber  harvesting,  and  minor  impacts  to  the 
roads  would  occur,  depending  on  local  climatic 
conditions.  No  additional  soil  disturbance  would 
be  associated  with  these  activities,  and  losses  to 
soil  productivity  due  to  removal  of  trees  would  be 
within  the  standards  and  guidelines  established 


by  the  Forest  Plan.  There  are  no  additional  surface 
disturbance  activities  proposed  for  the  analysis 
area  in  the  current  planning  period. 

CONSISTENCY  WITH  FOREST  PLAN 
STANDARDS  AND  GUIDELINES 

All  the  alternatives  are  consistent  with  Forest  Plan 
standards  and  guidelines  or  the  soil  resource. 


HYDROLOGY  EFFECTS 

Road  construction  and  use  and  timber  harvest 
may  cause  direct  effects  to  water  quality  from  ac- 
celerated erosion,  particularly  at  stream  crossings. 
Indirect  effects  to  the  hydrology  of  the  area  are 
those  that  do  not  immediately  affect  water  quality, 
but  may  affect  water  quality  in  the  long  term,  such 
as  increased  water  yield  and  changes  in  the  timing 
of  peak  flow  due  to  timber  harvesting. 

Water  Quality  and  Stream  Sedimentation 

The  most  prevalent  cause  of  direct  sediment  intro- 
duction into  streams  from  timber  harvesting  activi- 
ties is  road  construction  (Megahan,  1972).  Lack  of 
effective  mitigation  measures  and  poor  road  loca- 
tion lead  to  sediment  being  deposited  directly  in 
the  stream.  Sediment  introduction  from  harvest 
units  is  generally  minimal  compared  to  that  from 
roads. 

No  significant  stream  sedimentation  is  anticipated 
from  the  proposed  action  alternatives,  except  Al- 
ternative 3,  due  to  the  stable  quartzite  soils  in  the 
sale  area,  the  use  of  filter  strips  adjacent  to 
streams,  and  the  development  of  site-specific  Best 
Management  Practices  (BMP’s),  or  mitigation 
measures. 

Water  Yield  and  Peak  Flows 

Total  water  yield  and  timing  of  peak  flows  are  de- 
pendent on  total  precipitation  and  the  snowmelt 
regime  of  an  area.  Much  research  has  been  done 
recently  to  determine  the  effect  of  vegetation  re- 
moval on  water  regimes.  These  studies  indicate 
that  timber  harvesting  can  cause  an  increase  in 
the  total  water  produced  by  a drainage  due  to  a 
reduction  of  transpiration  by  removal  of  trees  and 
an  increase  in  the  amount  of  snow  reaching  the 
ground  due  to  reduced  snow  interception  by  the 


IV -4 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


tree  cover  and  redistribution  of  snow  during 
storms.  Research  done  in  Colorado  in  high  eleva- 
tion areas  with  similar  precipitation  patterns  to 
those  in  the  analysis  area  and  a cold,  dry  snow- 
pack  has  confirmed  that  timber  harvesting  can 
both  increase  and  advance  peak  flows  (Troendle 
and  King,  1985).  However,  it  has  been  generally 
noted  that  20  to  30  percent  of  the  watershed  has 
to  be  harvested  before  a significant  change  in  flow 
can  be  detected  (T roendle  and  Leaf,  1 980  as  cited 
by  Troendle,  1982).  The  observations  in  Little 
Woodtick  Creek  following  the  1991  spring 


snowmelt  runoff  support  the  20  to  30  percent  rule 
of  thumb.  Twenty-three  percent  of  this  drainage 
was  harvested,  resulting  in  increased  runoff  and 
stream  channel  erosion  (See  discussion  under  Hy- 
drology, Chapter  III). 

The  percentages  of  drainages  cut  for  all  alterna- 
tives are  shown  in  Table  IV-2.  The  percentage  of 
the  drainages  cut  under  all  the  action  alternatives 
proposed  are  well  below  20  percent.  Peak  flows 


TABLE  IV-2:  PERCENT  OF  DRAINAGES  HARVESTED  IN  THE  MOYER  SALT  ANALYSIS  AREA 


ALT  1 

ALT  2 

ALTS 

ALT  4 

ALTS 

ALT  6 

ALT 

2A 

PRE- 

FERRED 

Woodtick  Creek  Drainage 

Existing  Harvesting 
(Tick  Creek  Timber  Sale) 

5.2 

5.2 

5.2 

5.2 

5.2 

5.2 

5.2 

Proposed  Harvesting 

0 

2.1 

1.8 

3.0 

0.8 

2.7 

1.9 

Total 

5.2 

7.3 

7.0 

8.2 

6.0 

7.9 

7.1 

Salt  Creek  Drainage 

0 

9.1 

4.5 

14.3 

5.1 

12.3 

8.2 

‘Perm’  Creek  Drainage 

0 

11.3 

11.3 

14.2 

4.3 

13.1 

10.4 

therefore  should  not  be  increased  to  a point  that 
channel  erosion  would  result  (Rosgen,  1978). 

EFFECTS  COMMON  TO  ALL  ACTION 


Creek  and  Perreau  Creek  Timber  Sales)  has 
shown  that  the  current 

guidelines  for  filter  strips  have  been  effective  in 
preventing  stream  sedimentation. 


Effects  Due  to  Timber  Harvesting:  With  the  proper 
utilization  of  adequate  filter  or  buffer  strips  be- 
tween the  cutting  units  and  the  adjacent  streams, 
there  is  a very  low  risk  of  sediment  reaching  either 
a perennial  or  intermittent  stream.  The  Forest  Plan 
contains  guidelines  for  filter  strip  widths  based  up- 
on geologic  parent  material,  percent  slope  and 
percent  ground  cover  (See  Appendix  B,  BMP 
Summary).  In  addition,  the  Idaho  Forestry  Prac- 
tices Act  (IFPA)  specifies  a minimum  Stream  Pro- 
tection Zone  (SPZ)  of  75  and  5 feet  for  Class  I and 
Class  II  steams,  respectively.  To  insure  compli- 
ance with  both  the  Forest  Plan  and  IFPA,  a mini- 
mum SPZ,  or  filter  strip,  of  75  feet  would  be  used 
for  all  perennial  streams.  Where  the  Forest  Plan 
recommends  a filter  strip  greater  that  75  feet  this 
distance  would  be  used.  Field  review  of  previous 
timber  sales  with  similar  soils  and  vegetation  (Tick 


With  the  application  of  the  general  BMP’s  for  tim- 
ber harvesting,  the  proposed  timber  harvesting  for 
each  action  alternative  would  not  have  an  adverse 
impact  on  water  quality.  The  filter  strips  would  en- 
sure that  sediment  from  the  cutting  units  does  not 
reach  any  intermittent  or  perennial  streams.  The 
fishery  mitigation  for  maintenance  of  a minimum 
75  foot  uncut  buffer  on  both  sides  of  the  perennial 
streams  would  ensure  thermal  cover  for  the 
streams  so  that  water  temperature  and  dissolved 
oxygen  would  not  be  adversely  impacted.  The  ex- 
isting beneficial  water  uses  would  not  be  adversely 
impacted  in  the  short  or  long  term  from  the  pro- 
posed timber  harvesting. 

Effects  Due  to  Road  Construction  and  Reconstruc- 
tion: In  addition  to  the  Soil  and  Water  BMP’s  for 
road  construction  specified  in  the  Forest  Plan  and 


IV  - 5 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  E1S 


Chapter  IV 


Idaho  Forestry  Practices  regulations,  site-specific 
BMP’s  have  been  developed  for  the  proposed  tim- 
ber sale  activities.  Although  the  amount  of  new 
road  construction  varies  for  each  alternative  (Ta- 
ble IV-1),  each  action  alternative,  except  Alterna- 
tive 5,  involves  crossing  Woodtick  Creek,  Good- 
luck  Creek,  Salt  Creek,  “Perm"  Creek,  and  the 
unnamed  drainage  in  the  SE  1/4  of  Section  10. 
Alternative  5 will  not  have  any  new  stream  cross- 
ings, but  the  existing  stream  crossing  on  Woodtick 
Creek  will  be  reconstructed  to  improve  fish  pas- 
sage. The  locations  of  the  stream  crossings  varies 
by  alternative,  and  are  discussed  below  under  "Ef- 
fects by  Alternative'.  Site-specific  BMP’s  for  these 
crossings  include  placement  of  a slash  windrow 
along  the  toe  of  the  fill  slope  adjacent  to  these 
streams.  Continuous  windrows  would  extend  out 
from  the  stream  crossings  until  an  adequate  filter 
strip  exists  between  the  toe  of  the  fill  slope  and  the 
stream.  The  remainder  of  the  road  will  also  have  a 
slash  windrow  for  soil  entrapment  placed  along 
the  toe  of  the  fill  slope.  However  outside  the  filter 
strip  short  segments  of  the  windrows  will  be  re- 
moved at  regular  intervals  for  wildlife  movement. 
The  use  of  slash  windrows  on  all  the  new  road 
construction  will  greatly  reduce  soil  movement 
downslope  from  the  roads,  and  consequently 
stream  sedimentation,  except  for  Alternative  3. 
This  mitigation  measure  would  greatly  minimize 
stream  sedimentation  associated  with  fill  slope 
erosion. 

Following  sale  closure  and  slash  treatment,  seg- 
ments of  the  roads  will  have  slash  placed  on  them 
to  prevent  travel  on  the  roads  for  protection  of  elk 
security  areas.  This  will  restrict  road  maintenance 
on  these  segments. 

There  is  a possibility  of  blockage  of  the  inside 
drainage  ditches  due  to  the  slash  placement  and 
restricted  road  maintenance.  This  could  result  in 
road  surface  and  fill  slope  erosion  if  water  from  the 
ditches  runs  across  the  road  surface.  To  mitigate 
this  potential  impact  these  road  segments  will  be 
surfaced  with  crushed  gravel  to  a depth  of  four 
inches.  In  addition,  supplemental  fertilization  of  the 
reseeded  areas  will  be  done  to  ensure  that  a good 
stand  of  grass  exists  on  the  fill  slopes  before  the 
slash  is  placed  on  the  road.  It  is  estimated  that  the 
slash  will  be  placed  on  the  road  3-5  years  after  the 
roads  are  constructed.  This  time  lapse  should  al- 
low for  a good  establishment  of  vegetation  on  the 


fill  slope  to  protect  it  from  surface  erosion  in  the 
event  of  water  running  across  the  road  and  down 
the  fill  slope  from  a blocked  drainage  ditch. 
Though  these  segments  will  be  impassable  to  ve- 
hicles they  will  be  inspected  annually  to  determine 
maintenance  needs.  Small  ditch  blockages  will  be 
cleaned  by  hand  crews.  Any  large  blockages  that 
are  observed  will  be  evaluated  as  to  their  potential 
to  cause  surface  erosion  and  fill  slope  failure.  If  a 
significant  hazard  is  identified  the  slash  will  be 
removed  from  the  road  to  allow  equipment  pas- 
sage to  correct  the  drainage  problem. 

Road  construction  should  not  have  any  long-term 
adverse  sedimentation  impacts  on  streams,  ex- 
cept for  the  Salt  Creek  stream  crossing  in  Alterna- 
tive 3.  The  only  anticipated  impacts  are  short-term 
increases  in  water  turbidity  and  minor  localized 
stream  sedimentation  associated  with  the  culvert 
installations.  These  negligible  increases  in  sedi- 
ment should  not  have  an  adverse  effect  on  fish  or 
fish  habitat.  The  existing  beneficial  water  uses  - 
cold  water  biota,  salmonid  spawning,  and  sec- 
ondary contact  recreation  - should  be  fully  protect- 
ed. 

Monitoring  of  the  Deep  Creek  watershed  on  the 
Cobalt  Ranger  District  has  shown  that  a watershed 
can  be  intensively  managed  for  timber  harvest  and 
still  meet  the  Forest  Plan  Standards  for  fine  sedi- 
ment in  anadromous  fish  spawning  habitat.  The 
Deep  Creek  watershed  which  has  stable  quartzite 
soils,  like  those  in  the  project  area,  has  a road 
density  of  1 .7  mile/mile  square  and  percent  fines- 
by-depth  in  the  spawning  gravels  of  14.4%.  This 
value  meets  the  Forest  Plan  objectives  of  less  than 
20%  fine  sediment  for  anadromous  fish  spawning 
habitat.  The  Deep  Creek  wateshed  is  similar  to 
Woodtick  Creek  in  that  the  majority  of  the  roads 
are  designed  roads  located  primarily  on  the  upper 
slopes  of  the  watershed.  Existing  primitive  roads 
are  largely  confined  to  the  ridges  where  sediment 
delivery  is  minimal. 

All  of  the  proposed  alternatives  would  result  in  a 
road  density  of  1.8  mile/square  mile  or  less  (Table 
IV-3),  compared  to  1.7  mile/square  mile  for  the 
Deep  Creek  watershed.  Road  density  is  important 
in  that  roads  are  documented  as  primary  sediment 
sources  (Megahan,  1972). 


IV  - 6 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


TABLE  IV-3:  ROAD  DENSITY 


Alt  1 

Alt  2 

Alt  3 

Alt  4 

Alt  5 

Alt  6 
PRE- 
FERRED 

Alt  2A 

Woodtlck  Creek 

Drainage 

(Mile/mile2) 

1.4 

1.8 

1.7 

1.8 

1.5 

1.8 

1.8 

Moyer  Creek  Drainage 

(Mile/mile2) 

0.7 

0.9 

0.9 

0.9 

0.7 

0.9 

0.9 

Sediment  Yield  Modeling:  A sediment  prediction 
model  was  run  for  all  of  the  proposed  alternatives 
to  address  water  quality  concerns  relating  to  in- 
creases in  stream  sedimentation  from  timber  har- 
vest activities.  The  BOISED  sediment  prediction 
model  was  used  for  this  analysis.  BOISED  was 
developed  on  the  Boise  National  Forest  and  it  is 
based  on  the  conceptual  model  described  in  the 
publication  entitled  'Guide  for  Predicting  Sediment 
Yields  from  Forested  Watershed'  published  in  Oc- 
tober 1 981  by  the  Northern  and  Intermountain  Re- 
gions of  the  USDA  Forest  Service.  The  BOISED 
program  is  to  be  used  as  a tool  to  aid  in  predicting 
the  cumulative  yield  of  sediment  from  road  con- 


struction, silvicultural  activities,  and  fire  within 
small  forested  watersheds  (approximately  1 to  50 
square  miles).  Model  outputs  are  expressed  as 
average  annual  sediment  yields  and  sediment 
yields  as  a percent  of  natural  sediment  yields  (% 
Over  Natural).  The  BOISED  computer  program  is 
not  Intended  to  be  a reliable  prediction  of  abso- 
lute sediment  quantities.  Model  outputs  should 
only  be  used  to  compare  alternative  manage- 
ment scenarios.  Table  IV-4  displays  the  results  of 
the  sediment  modeling  by  watershed  and  alterna- 
tives. The  results  are  addressed  in  the  following 
discussion  of  each  alternative. 


Table  IV-4:  Sediment  Yield  Modeling  Results 


SEDIMENT  AT  CRITICAL  REACH  - WOODTICK  CREEK 


ALT  1 

ALT  2&2A 

ALT  3 

ALT  4&6 

ALTS 

YEAR 

TOTAL 

(tons/yr) 

% 

O.N. 

* 

TOTAL 

(tons/yr 

% 

O.N. 

* 

TOTAL 

(tons/yr) 

% 

O.N. 

* 

TOTALS 

(tons/yr) 

% 

O.N. 

* 

TOTALS 

(tons/yr) 

* 

% 

O.N. 

1993 

50 

17 

50 

17 

50 

17 

50 

17 

50 

17 

1994 

50 

17  • 

112 

160 

119 

177 

116 

169 

59 

37 

1995 

50 

15 

69 

60 

72 

67 

72 

66 

53 

23 

1996 

49 

15 

58 

35 

61 

41 

62 

43 

52 

20 

1997 

49 

15 

55 

27 

58 

28 

56 

29 

51 

17 

1998 

49 

14 

53 

23 

52 

22 

53 

22 

50 

16 

1999 

49 

14 

52 

20 

50 

16 

50 

17 

50 

15 

2000 

49 

14 

51 

19 

50 

16 

50 

15 

49 

14 

2001 

49 

14 

51 

18 

50 

15 

50 

15 

49 

14 

2002 

49 

14 

51 

18 

50 

15 

50 

15 

49 

14 

IV  - 7 


Moyer  Saft  Timber  Sate  Final  ESS 


Chapter  IV 


SEDIMENT  AT  CRITICAL  REACH  - MOYER  CREEK 


ALT  1 

ALT  2&2A 

ALTS 

ALT 

ALT  5 

YEAR 

TOTAL 

(tons/yr) 

% 

O.N. 

* 

.TOTAL 

(tons/yr 

% 

O.N. 

* 

TOTAL 

(tons/yr) 

% 

O.N. 

* 

TOTALS 

(tons/yr) 

% 

O.N. 

* 

TOTALS 

(tons/yr) 

* 

% 

O.N. 

1993 

127 

23 

127 

23 

127 

23 

127 

23 

127 

23 

1994 

127 

23 

175 

70 

184 

78 

178 

73 

132 

29 

1995 

127 

23 

141 

37 

144 

40 

143 

38 

129 

25 

1996 

127 

23 

132 

28 

134 

30 

133 

30 

128 

24 

1997 

127 

23 

130 

27 

131 

27 

131 

27 

127 

23 

1998 

127 

23 

129 

26 

130 

26 

129 

25 

127 

23 

1999 

127 

23 

128 

25 

128 

25 

128 

24 

127 

23 

2000 

127 

23 

128 

25 

128 

24 

128 

24 

127 

23 

2001 

127 

23 

128 

24 

128 

24 

128 

24 

127 

23 

2002 

127 

23 

128 

24 

128 

24 

128 

24 

127 

23 

* % Over  Natural 


EFFECTS  BY  ALTERNATIVE 

Alternative  1 - N©  Action 

There  would  be  no  direct  or  indirect  effect  on  water 
quality  under  this  alternative  as  a result  of  addition- 
al timber  harvesting  activities.  Stream  sedimenta- 
tion from  channel  erosion  in  Little  Woodtick  Creek 
will  continue  to  occur  until  ground  cover  condi- 
tions in  the  upper  watershed  improve  and  logged 
areas  are  regenerated  (see  discussion  under  Hy- 
drology, Chapter  III).  The  effects  of  this  stream 
sedimentation  are  localized  and  should  not  ad- 
versely impact  beneficial  water  uses  in  Woodtick 
Creek. 

Under  the  No  Action  Alternative  there  would  be  no 
additional  effect  on  water  yield  from  any  of  the 
drainages  within  the  analysis  area.  The  existing 
effect  of  increased  water  yield  in  the  Little 
Woodtick  Creek  drainage  will  continue  to  occur 
until  the  area  is  regenerated  and  the  trees  grow  to 
a size  sufficient  to  offset  the  changes  in  snow  ac- 
cumulation and  melt  caused  by  timber  harvest  in 
the  Tick  Creek  Timber  Sale. 

Sediment  modeling  results  show  that  this  alterna- 
tive would  result  in  the  least  amount  of  sediment 


generated.  Sediment  production  in  the  Woodtick 
Creek  drainage  would  start  out  at  1 7%  over  natural 
(O.N.)  levels,  as  a result  of  the  existing  roads  in  the 
drainage  and  past  timber  harvest  activities.  This 
level  would  decline  to  14%  O.N.  by  1998  and  re- 
main at  this  level  through  2002,  which  is  the  end  of 
the  time  period  modeled  (Table  IV-4).  Sediment 
production  in  the  Moyer  Creek  drainage  would 
start  out  at  23%  O.N.  levels  and  remain  at  this  level 
through  2002. 

Percent  fines  by  depth  measured  in  spawning 
habitat  in  Woodtick  Creek  should  remain  at  or  near 
the  1 5%  level  measured  in  1 992.  This  value  meets 
the  Forest  Plan  Standard  of  20%  or  less  fines  in 
anadromous  fish  spawning  habitat.  No  adverse 
impacts  to  water  quality  would  occur  under  this 
alternative  and  the  designated  beneficial  water  us- 
es would  be  protected. 

Road  density  would  remain  at  1.4  miles/mile 
square  in  the  Woodtick  Creek  drainage  and  .65 
miles/mile  square  in  the  Moyer  Creek  drainage 
(Table  IV-3). 

Alternative  2 

Under  this  alternative,  41 0 acres  of  of  clearcut  and 
158  acres  of  shelterwood  timber  harvesting  would 


IV -8 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


occur.  With  the  implementation  of  the  BMP’s  de- 
scribed above,  no  adverse  impacts  are  anticipated 
from  timber  harvesting. 

Under  this  alternative  16.8  miles  of  new  road  con- 
struction is  planned.  Road  density  would  increase 
to  1.8  miles/square  mile  in  the  Woodtick  Creek 
drainage  and  to  .9  mile/square  mile  in  the  Moyer 
Creek  drainage.  The  major  stream  crossings  in- 
clude upper  Woodtick  Creek,  Goodluck  Creek,  up- 
per Salt  Creek,  and  ■Perm'  Creek  (Figure  11-2, 
Chapter  II).  A slash  windrow  would  be  placed 
along  the  toe  of  the  fill  slope  on  all  the  new  roads. 
This  mitigation  measure  would  greatly  minimize 
stream  sedimentation  associated  with  fill  slope 
erosion. 

The  effects  on  water  yields  and  peak  flow  increas- 
es from  the  proposed  timber  harvest  activities  are 
expected  to  be  within  acceptable  limits.  Under  this 
alternative  2.1  percent  of  the  Woodtick  Creek 
drainage,  9.1  percent  of  the  Salt  Creek  drainage, 
and  1 1 .3  percent  of  the  ’Perm'  Creek  drainage  are 
proposed  for  timber  harvest.  This  proposed  har- 
vest, in  combination  with  the  existing  cutover  ar- 
eas (Tick  Creek  Timber  Sale,  1988)  in  the 
Woodtick  drainage,  would  increase  the  percent- 
age of  that  drainage  harvested  to  7.3  percent. 

The  effects  of  this  alternative  on  water  yield  and 
peak  flow  increases  should  be  minor  as  the 
drainage  percentages  are  well  below  20  percent. 
Because  no  major  increased  peak  flow  is  anticipat- 
ed, channel  erosion  associated  with  inceases  in 
peak  flow  should  not  occur. 

Sediment  modeling  results  show  that  this  alterna- 
tive would  be  in  the  middle  of  sediment  production 
ranking.  Sediment  production  in  the  Woodtick 
Creek  drainage  would  start  out  at  1 7%  over  natural 
levels  (O.N.)  in  1992,  increase  to  160%  O.N.  in 
1 994  following  road  construction  and  timber  har- 
vest activites,  and  then  sharply  decrease  to  23% 
O.N.  by  1998.  Sediment  production  in  the  Moyer 
Creek  drainage  would  start  out  at  23%  O.N.  in 
1992,  increase  to  70%  O.N.  in  1994,  and  then  de- 
crease to  26%  O.N.  by  1998  (Table  IV-4). 

Increased  sediment  production  is  not  expected  to 
exceed  the  streams  capacity  to  transport  sedi- 
ment. Percent  fines  by  depth  are  expected  to  re- 
main below  20%  in  Woodtick  Creek  which  would 
be  below  the  Forest  Plan  standard  of  20%  or  less 


fines-by-depth  in  anadromous  fish  spawning  habi- 
tat (See  discussion  of  Deep  Creek  Watershed  un- 
der Effects  Due  to  Road  Construction  and  Recon- 
struction, Hydrology,  Chapter  4).  The  only 
anticipated  water  quality  impacts  are  short-term 
increases  in  water  turbidity  and  localized  stream 
sedimentation  associated  with  culvert  installations 
and  road  approaches  to  the  stream  crossings. 
These  temporary  increases  in  sediment  will  be 
minimized  by  the  use  of  filter  slash  windrows  along 
the  toe  of  the  fill  slopes  on  the  new  roads.  The 
existing  beneficial  water  uses  are  expected  to  still 
be  fully  protected. 

Alternative  3 

Under  this  alternative,  270  acres  of  clearcut  and 
1 70  acres  of  shelterwood  timber  harvesting  would 
occur.  With  implementation  of  the  BMP’s  de- 
scribed above,  no  adverse  impacts  are  anticipated 
from  timber  harvesting. 

Under  this  alternative  14.6  miles  of  new  road  con- 
struction is  planned.  Road  density  would  increase 
to  1.7  mile/square  mile  in  the  Woodtick  Creek 
drainage  and  to  .9  mile/square  mile  in  the  Moyer 
Creek  drainage.  The  proposed  major  stream 
crossings  would  include  upper  Woodtick  Creek, 
Goodluck  Creek,  lower  Salt  Creek  and  upper  and 
lower  'Perm'  Creek  (Figure  11-3,  Chapter  II). 

Except  for  the  Salt  Creek  crossing,  the  new  stream 
crossing  locations  are  the  same  as  Alternative  2. 
The  Salt  Creek  crossing  has  been  changed  from  a 
location  in  the  headwaters  of  the  drainage  to  a 
lower  site  where  the  stream  flows  through  a steep, 
V-shaped  valley  bottom.  Construction  of  a cross- 
ing in  this  location  has  a significantly  greater  po- 
tential for  stream  sedimentation  than  the  Salt 
Creek  crossing  in  Alternative  2.  The  steep 
sideslopes  would  result  in  long  fill  slopes  immedi- 
ately adjacent  to  the  stream.  The  lack  of  slash  and 
the  slope  steepness  will  also  prohibit  the  construc- 
tion of  an  effective  slash  windrow  along  the  toe  of 
the  fill  slope.  In  addition,  the  south  facing  sage- 
brush hillside  adjacent  to  this  crossing  would  be 
difficult  to  revegetate.  Revegetation  of  this  slope 
would  take  longer  than  the  other  crossings  that  are 
located  in  wetter,  cooler  micro-climates.  As  a result 
of  these  factors  stream  sedimentation  is  anticipat- 
ed at  the  lower  Salt  Creek 
crossing.  This  effect  would  persist  until  the  fill 
slope  is  revegetated. 


IV -9 


W?oyer  SaSt  Timber  Sale  Final  E1S 


Chapter  IV 


Under  this  alternative  there  would  also  be  recon- 
struction of  the  first  eight  miles  of  Road  No.  1 07. 
The  majority  of  this  reconstruction  would  be  minor. 
The  major  impact  of  the  reconstruction  would  be 
the  replacement  of  the  culvert  on  Woodtick  Creek 
with  an  open  bottom  arch  or  an  oversized  culvert 
to  provide  fish  passage  (see  Fisheries  Effects,  this 
Chapter).  Installation  of  an  open  bottom  arch  on 
larger  streams,  such  as  the  lower  Woodtick  cross- 
ing, can  result  in  increased  water  turbidity  intermit- 
tently for  periods  up  to  two  weeks. 

Sediment  modeling  results  show  that  this  alterna- 
tive would  result  in  the  most  sediment  production. 
Though  actual  miles  of  road  construction  and  road 
densities  would  be  slightly  less  than  Alternatives 
2,4,  6 and  2A  the  location  of  the  roads  lower  on  the 
slopes  on  more  erosive  landtypes  results  in 
greater  sediment  production  for  this  alternative. 

Sediment  production  in  the  Woodtick  Creek 
drainage  would  start  out  at  1 7%  over  natural  levels 
(O.N.)  in  1992,  increase  to  177%  O.N.  in  1994  fol- 
lowing sale  implementation,  and  then  sharply  de- 
crease to  22%  O.N.  by  1 998.  Sediment  production 
in  the  Moyer  Creek  drainage  would  start  out  at 
23%  O.N.  in  1992,  increase  to  78%  O.N.  in  1994 
and  then  decrease  to  26%  O.N.  by  1998  (Table 
IV-4). 

Increased  sediment  production  is  not  expected  to 
exceed  the  streams  capacity  to  transport  sedi- 
ment, except  for  Salt  Creek.  Percent  fines  by 
depth  are  expected  to  remain  below  20%  in 
Woodtick  Creek  which  would  be  below  the  Foest 
Plan  standard  of  20%  or  less  fines-by-depth  in 
anadromous  fish  spawning  habitat.  (See  discus- 
sion under  Effects  Due  to  Road  Construction  and 
Reconstruction,  Hydrology,  Chapter  4).  The  exist- 
ing beneficial  water  uses  are  expected  to  still 
be  fully  protected  in  Woodtick  Creek,  Perm  Creek 
and  Moyer  Creek. 

The  effects  of  the  lower  Salt  Creek  crossing  will  be 
the  greatest.  Because  of  the  steep  side  slopes  and 
the  reduced  potential  for  revegetation  of  this 
south-facing  slope,  stream  sedimentation  is  antici- 
pated in  this  location.  This  could  cause  some  im- 
pairment of  beneficial  water  uses  in  Salt  Creek  until 
the  disturbed  slopes  are  revegetated. 

Th®  effects  on  water  yield  and  peak  flow  increases 
from  the  proposed  timber  harvest  are  expected  to 
be  within  acceptable  limits.  Under  this  alternative, 


1 .8  percent  of  the  Woodtick  Creek  drainage,  4.5 
percent  of  the  Salt  Creek  drainage,  and  1 1 .3  per- 
cent of  the  “Perm"  Creek  drainage  are  proposed 
for  timber  harvest.  This  alternative  proposal,  in 
combination  with  the  existing  cutover  areas  (Tick 
Creek  Timber  Sale,  1988)  in  the  Woodtick 
drainage,  would  increase  the  percentage  of  the 
drainage  harvested  to  7 percent. 

The  effects  of  this  alternative  on  water  yield  and 
peak  flow  increases  should  not  be  major  as  the 
drainage  percentages  are  well  below  20  percent. 
No  channel  erosion  as  a result  of  greater  in- 
creased peak  flow  is  anticipated. 

Alternative  4 

Under  this  alternative,  645  acres  of  clearcut  and 
202  acres  of  shelterwood  timber  harvesting  would 
occur.  With  implementation  of  the  BMP’s  de- 
scribed above  and  in  Appendix  B,  no  adverse  im- 
pacts are  anticipated. 

Under  this  alternative  17.8  miles  of  new  road  con- 
struction is  planned. 

Road  density  would  increase  to  1.8  mile/square 
mile  in  the  Woodtick  Creek  drainage  and  to  .9 
mile/square  mile  in  the  Moyer  Creek  drainage. 
The  proposed  road  locations  and  stream  cross- 
ings for  this  alternative  (shown  in  Figure  11-4,  Chap- 
ter II)  are  the  same  as  Alternative  2 (shown  in 
Figure  11-2,  Chapter  II),  except  for  a one  mile  spur 
off  existing  Road  No.  1 07  in  the  Woodtick  Creek 
drainage.  This  spur  is  located  on  the  upper  slopes 
of  the  drainage  and  would  not  cause  any  stream 
sedimentation.  The  effects  of  road  construction 
under  this  alternative  would  be  essentially  the 
same  as  discussed  under  Alternative  2. 

Sediment  modeling  results  show  that  this  alterna- 
tive would  produce  slightly  more  sediment  than 
Alternative  2,  and  slightly  less  than  Alternative  3. 
Sediment  production  in  the  the  Woodtick  Creek 
drainage  would  start  out  at  1 7%  over  natural  levels 
(O.N.)  in  1992,  increase  to  169%  O.N.  in  1994  fol- 
lowing sale  implementation  and  then  sharply  de- 
crease to  22%  O.N.  by  1998.  Sediment  production 
in  the  Moyer  Creek  drainage  would  start  out  at 
23%  O.N.  in  1992,  increase  to  73%  O.N.  in  1994 
and  then  decrease  to  25%  O.N.  by  1998  (Table 
IV-4). 

Increased  sediment  production  is  not  expected  to 
exceed  the  streams  capacity  to  transport  sedi- 


IV-  10 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


ment.  Percent  fines  by  depth  are  expected  to  re- 
main below  20%  in  Woodtick  Creek  which  would 
be  below  the  Forest  Plan  Standard  of  20%  or  less 
fines  by  depth  in  anadromous  fish  spawning  habi- 
tat. (See  discussion  under  Effects  Due  to  Road 
Construction  and  Reconstruction,  Hydrology, 
Chapter  4).  The  only  anticipated  water  quality  im- 
pacts are  short-term  increases  in  water  turbidity 
and  localized  stream  sedimentation  associated 
with  culvert  installations  and  road  approaches  to 
the  stream  crossings.  These  temporary  increases 
in  sediment  will  be  minimized  by  the  use  of  slash 
windrows  along  the  toe  of  the  fill  slopes  along  the 
roads.  The  existing  beneficial  water  uses  are  ex- 
pected to  still  be  fully  protected. 

The  effects  on  water  yield  and  peak  flow  increases 
from  the  proposed  timber  harvest,  though  greater 
under  this  alternative,  are  expected  to  be  within 
acceptable  limits.  Under  this  alternative,  3.0  per- 
cent of  the  Woodtick  Creek  drainage,  14.3  percent 
of  the  Salt  Creek  drainage,  and  14.2  percent  of  the 
"Perm'  Creek  drainage  are  proposed  for  timber 
harvest.  This  acreage,  in  combination  with  the  cu- 
tover areas  (Tick  Creek  Timber  Sale,  1 988)  in  the 
Woodtick  Creek  drainage,  would  increase  the  per- 
centage of  that  drainage  harvested  to  8.2  percent. 

The  effects  of  water  yield  and  peak  flow  increases, 
while  greater  in  the  “Perm'  and  Salt  Creek 
drainages  under  this  alternative,  would  not  be  ma- 
jor. The  percentages  of  the  drainages  proposed 
for  harvest  are  still  below  20  percent.  No  channel 
erosion  as  a result  of  greatly  increased  peak  flow 
is  anticipated. 

Alternative  5 

Under  this  alternative  124  acres  of  clearcut  and 
1 68  acres  of  shelterwood  timber  harvesting  would 
occur.  This  alternative  would  have  the  least 
amount  of  watershed  disturbance  of  any  of  the 
action  alternatives.  Only  1.15  miles  of  new  road 
would  be  constructed  and  8.0  miles  of  road  would 
be  reconstructed.  The  majority  of  this  reconstruc- 
tion would  be  minor  except  for  the  replacement  of 
the  existing  culvert  on  Woodtick  Creek  to  improve 
fish  passage  during  high  flows.  The  new  road  con- 
struction is  a short  spur  road  that  would  be  located 
on  the  upper  slopes  with  no  new  stream  crossings. 
Road  density  would  increase  to  1 .5  mile/square 
mile  in  the  Woodtick  Creek  drainage,  but  would 
not  change  in  the  Moyer  Creek  drainage. 


Sediment  modeling  results  show  that  this  alterna- 
tive would  result  in  the  least  sediment  production 
of  all  the  action  alternatives.  Sediment  production 
in  the  Woodtick  Creek  drainage  would  start  out  at 
17%  over  natural  levels  (O.N.)  in  1992,  increase  to 
37%  O.N.  in  1994  following  sale  implementation, 
and  then  decrease  to  16%  O.N.  in  1998.  Sediment 
production  in  the  Moyer  Creek  drainage  would 
start  out  at  23%  O.N.  in  1 992  increase  to  29%  O.N. 
in  1994  then  decrease  to  23%  O.N.  by  1998  (Table 
IV-4). 

The  minor  increases  in  sediment  production  for 
this  alternative  would  not  exceed  the  streams  ca- 
pacity to  transport  the  sediment.  Percent  fines-by- 
depth  in  the  spawning  habitat  are  expected  to 
remain  below  20%  in  Woodtick  Creek  which  would 
be  below  the  Forest  Plan  standard  of  20%  or  less 
fines-by-depth  in  anadromous  spawning  habitat. 
(See  discussion  under  Effects  Due  to  Road  Con- 
struction and  Reconstruction,  Hydrology,  Chapter 
IV).  The  only  anticipated  water  quality  impacts  are 
short  term  increases  in  turbidity  and  short  term 
localized  stream  sedimentation  associated  with  re- 
placing the  existing  culvert  on  Woodtick  Creek. 
Installation  of  an  open  bottom  arch  on  larger 
streams,  such  as  Woodtick  Creek,  can  result  in 
increased  water  turbidity  intermittently  for  periods 
up  to  two  weeks.  The  existing  beneficial  water  us- 
es are  expected  to  be  fully  protected. 

The  effects  on  water  yield  and  peak  flow  increases 
from  the  harvest  proposed  under  this  alternative 
are  expected  to  be  very  minor.  Cumulative  harvest 
in  the  Woodtick  Creek  drainage  would  increase  to 
6.0%  with  the  proposed  harvest.  A total  of  5.1%  of 
the  Salt  Creek  drainage  and  4.3%  of  the  'Perm' 
Creek  drainage  would  be  harvested  under  this  al- 
ternative. The  percentage  of  the  drainages  pro- 
posed for  harvest  are  well  below  the  20%  threshold 
where  changes  in  flow  can  possibly  be  detected. 
No  channel  erosion  as  a result  of  increased  peak 
flows  are  anticipated. 

Alternative  6 PREFERRED 

Under  this  alternative  552  acres  of  clearcut  and 
202  acres  of  shelterwood  timber  harvesting  would 
occur.  New  road  construction  would  total  17.8 
miles.  The  only  difference  between  this  alternative 
and  Alternative  4 is  the  retention  of  unharvested 
islands  in  15  of  the  proposed  clearcut  units.  While 
this  will  result  in  a reduction  of  64  acres  of  treated 
area  the  effects  of  this  alternative  are  essentially 


IV  - 11 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


the  same  as  Alternative  4 for  the  following  reasons: 

1)  The  road  network  would  be  exactly  the  same  as 
Alternative  4; 

2)  Though  uncut  islands  will  be  left  in  some  of  the 
clearcut  units  the  skid  trail  density  within  these 
units  would  essentially  be  the  same,  resulting  in 
approximately  the  same,  amount  of  surface  dis- 
turbance. 3)  The  road  densities  and  sediment  yield 
modeling  results  are  the  same  as  Alternative  4.  For 
these  reasons  the  effects  of  this  alternative  are  the 
same  as  discussed  under  Alternative  4. 

Alternative  2A 

Under  this  alternative  345  acres  of  clearcut  and 
1 58  acres  of  shelterwood  timber  harvesting  would 
occur.  New  road  construction  would  total  16.8 
miles.  The  only  difference  between  this  alternative 
and  Alternative  2 is  the  retention  of  unharvested 
islands  in  21  of  the  proposed  clearcut  units.  While 
this  will  result  in  a reduction  of  84  acres  of  treated 
area  the  effects  of  this  alternative  are  essentially 
the  same  as  Alternative  2 for  the  following  reasons: 
1)  The  road  network  would  be  exactly  the  same  as 
Attentive  2.  2)  Though  uncut  islands  will  be  left  in 
some  of  the  clearcut  units  the  skid  trail  density 
within  these  units  would  essentially  be  the  same, 
resulting  in  approximately  the  same  amount  of  sur- 
face disturbance.  3)  The  road  densities  and  sedi- 
ment yield  modeling  results  are  the  same  as 
Alternative  2.  For  these  reasons  the  effects  of  this 
alternative  are  the  same  as  discussed  under  Alter- 
native 2. 

CUMULATIVE  EFFECTS 

Future  proposed  activities  within  the  analysis  area 
include  timber  stand  improvement  (thinning)  with- 
in the  shelterwood  units,  post  and  pole  harvest, 
firewood  and  house  log  salvage.  No  additional 
commercial  sawlog  timber  sales  are  scheduled  for 
the  remainder  of  the  current  planning  period, 
which  extends  through  1 998.  No  additional  roads 
are  planned  for  construction  for  the  post  and  pole 
or  firewood  harvesting.  The  effects  of  these  pro- 
posed activities  should  be  very  minimal  since  no 
additional  roads  would  be  constructed  and  soil 
disturbance  associated  with  these  activities  is  neg- 
ligible. The  cumulative  effects  would  essentially  be 
the  same  as  described  under  the  Direct  and  Indi- 
rect Effects  for  the  alternatives. 


CONSISTENCY  WITH  FOREST  PLAN 
STANDARDS  AND  GUIDELINES 

All  of  the  proposed  alternatives,  except  Alternative 
3,  are  consistent  with  Forest  Plan  standards  and 
guidelines  for  water.  Alternative  3 could  cause 
some 

impairment  of  beneficial  water  uses  in  Salt  Creek 

until  the  disturbed  areas  are 

revegetated. 


WETLANDS  EFFECTS 

The  effects  on  wetlands  from  the  proposed  ac- 
tivites  are  expected  to  be  very  minor.  A wetlands 
analysis  was  conducted  to  determine  what  the 
specific  impacts  would  be  for  each  alternative. 

Normal  silvicultural  activities  and  the  construction 
or  maintenance  of  forest  roads  for  timber  harvest- 
ing purposes  are  exempt  from  the  requirements  of 
the  404  permit  process  (CFR  33,  Part  323.4),  pro- 
viding that  they  are  constructed  and  maintained  in 
accordance  with  Best  Mangement  Practices.  All  of 
the  roads  proposed  under  the  various  alternatives 
are  single  purpose,  silviculture  roads  that  would 
be  exempt  from  404  permits.  No  Individual  or  Na- 
tionwide 404  Permits  would  be  required  for  any  of 
the  proposed  activites. 

Direct  and  Indirect  Effects  from  Timber  Harvest 

Alternatives  2,  4,  5,  6 and  2A:  Isolated  wetlands 
derived  from  springs  or  seeps  are  found  at  the 
lower  boundary  of  Units  25  and  SI 4.  Limits  of  the 
wet  area  within  the  units  will  be  flagged  so  that 
they  can  be  avoided  (See  Wetland  Mitigations). 
This  would  prevent  surface  disturbance  of  the  wet- 
lands. 

Alternative  3:  An  isolated  wetland  derived  from  a 
spring  or  seep  is  found  in  Unit  25.  Limits  of  the  wet 
area  within  the  unit  will  be  flagged  so  that  it  can  be 
avoided  to  mimimize  surface  disturbance  of  the 
wetland  (See  Water  Mitigations). 

Direct  and  Indirect  Effects  From 
Road  Construction 

During  road  location  one  primary  objective  was  to 
avoid  or  minimize  any  adverse  impacts  to  wet- 
lands. An  effort  was  made  to  locate  stream  cross- 


IV-  12 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


ings  in  reaches  where  the  stream  channels  are 
well  defined  and  the  riparian  wetlands  are  narrow. 
However,  it  was  not  always  possible  to  locate  the 
crossings  in  reaches  where  the  wetland  was  nar- 
row. Due  to  topographic  features  and  grade  con- 
straints, some  isolated  wetlands  derived  from 
springs  and  seeps  could  not  be  avoided  and  will 
be  crossed  by  the  proposed  roads. 

Alternatives  2, 4, 5, 6,  and  2A):  Major  stream  cross- 
ings for  these  alternatives  include  Goodluck 
Creek,  upper  Woodtick  Creek,  upper  Salt  Creek 
and  upper  Perm  Creek.  The  Woodtick  and  Good- 
luck  Creek  crossings  are  located  just  above  the 
confluence  of  these  two  streams.  The  Salt  Creek 
and  Perm  Creek  crossings  are  located  in  the  head- 
waters of  these  streams.  All  of  these  crossings  are 
located  in  reaches  where  the  stream  is  confined 
and  only  a stringer  riparian  spruce  wetland  adja- 
cent to  the  stream  is  found. 

Minor  stream  crossings  include  two  forks  of  an 
unnamed  tributary  of  Woodtick  Creek  (between 
proposed  cutting  Units  1 1 and  1 9)  and  crossings 
at  the  headwaters  of  five  small  tributaries  of  Salt 
Creek.  Six  of  these  seven  tributary  stream  cross- 
ings are  located  where  the  riparian  wetlands  ex- 
tend beyond  the  defined  channel  or  draw  bottom. 
The  length  of  these  wetlands  at  the  point  that  they 
are  crossed  by  the  proposed  road  ranges  from  75 
to  400  feet.  The  size  of  the  impacted  (filled)  wet- 
land areas  ranges  from  .03  acre  to  .18  acre.  The 
most  extensive  wetland,  which  is  approximately 
400  wide,  is  located  adjacent  to  a fork  of  an  un- 
named tributary  of  Woodtick  Creek  between  Units 
#13  and  #19.  This  spruce  riparian  wetland  is 
found  in  a glacial  moraine  near  the  head  of  a 
cirque  basin.  This  spruce  wetland  extended  for  at 
least  one  third  of  a mile  above  and  below  the  pro- 
posed crossing  so  it  was  not  possible  to  make 
minor  alignment  changes  to  avoid  this  wetland.  An 
inside  ditch  and  culverts  will  be  constructed  on  the 
portions  of  the  road  that  would  cross  these  wet- 
lands. This  will  allow  any  intercepted  water  to  flow 
under  the  road  and  back  into  the  downslope  wet- 
land. 

The  proposed  roads  would  cross  two  isolated  wet- 
lands derived  from  springs  or  seeps.  One  is  locat- 
ed just  west  of  Unit  7 and  one  is  located  at  the 
lower  edge  of  Unit  25.  These  two  isolated  wetlands 
are  approximately  150  feet  and  100  feet  wide  and 
the  impacted  wetland  areas  will  be  .13  acre  and 
.05  acre,  respectively. 


Alternative  3:  The  major  stream  crossings  for  this 
alternative  include  Goodluck  Creek,  upper 
Woodtick  Creek,  upper  and  lower  Perm  Creek  and 
lower  Salt  Creek.  The  Woodtick  and  Goodluck 
Creek  crossings  are  located  just  above  the  conflu- 
ence of  these  two  streams.  The  upper  Perm  Creek 
crossing  is  located  in  the  headwaters  of  this 
drainage  and  the  lower  crossing  is  located  approx- 
imately 1 /3  mile  downstream  from  the  upper  cross- 
ing. The  lower  Salt  Creek  crossing  is  located  north 
of  Unit  #S12.  All  of  these  stream  crossings  would 
be  located  in  reaches  where  the  stream  is  confined 
and  there  is  only  a stringer  riparian  wetland  adja- 
cent the  stream. 

Minor  stream  crossings  include  two  forks  of  an 
unnamed  tributary  of  Woodtick  Creek  (between 
proposed  Units  #11  and  #14).  These  stream 
crossings  are  also  located  in  reaches  where  the 
streams  are  confined  and  there  is  only  a stringer 
riparian  spruce  wetland  adjacent  to  the  stream. 

The  roads  proposed  for  this  alternative  also  would 
cross  two  isolated  wetlands  derived  from  springs 
and  seeps.  One  wetland  is  located  just  west  of  Unit 
7 and  the  other  is  located  at  the  lower  edge  of  Unit 
25.  These  two  isolated  wetlands  are  approximately 
1 50  feet  and  1 00  feet  wide  and  the  impacted  areas 
will  be  0.13  acre  and  0.05  acre,  respectively. 

CUMULATIVE  EFFECTS 

Future  proposed  activities  within  the  analysis  area 
include  timber  stand  improvement  (thinning)  with- 
in the  shelterwood  units,  post  and  pole  harvest 
(approximately  1 00  acres)  and  firewood  salvage. 
No  additional  commercial  sawlog  timber  sales  are 
scheduled  for  the  remainder  of  the  current  plan- 
ning period  which  extends  through  1 998.  No  addi- 
tional roads  are  planned  for  construction  for  the 
post  and  pole  or  firewood  harvesting.  The  effects 
of  these  proposed  activities  on  wetlands  would  be 
negligible  since  no  additional  roads  will  be  con- 
structed and  no  additional  fill  will  be  placed  in  any 
wetlands.  The  cumulative  effects  would  essentially 
be  the  same  as  described  under  the  Direct  and 
Indirect  Effects  for  the  various  alternatives. 

CONSISTENCY  WITH  FOREST  PLAN 
STANDARDS  AND  GUIDELINES 

All  action  alternatives  are  consistent  with  Forest 
Plan  standards  and  guidelines  for  wetlands. 


IV  - 13 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


FISHERIES  EFFECTS 

A Biological  Assessment  was  prepared  for  the 
DEIS  which  addressed  the  potential  impacts  of 
alternatives  1 through  4 on  federally  listed  or  pro- 
posed Threatened  and  Endangered  aquatic  verte- 
brate species  (DEIS  Appendix  F). 

A Biological  Evaluation  which  addressed  the  po- 
tential impacts  of  these  same  alternatives  on  For- 
est Service  Region  4 Sensitive  aquatic  vertebrate 
species  was  also  prepared  at  that  time  (DEIS  Ap- 
pendix G).  The  Biological  Eavaluation  document 
was  reformatted  and  updated  in  the  FEIS  to  in- 
clude three  new  alternatives  not  included  within 
the  DEIS  (FEIS  Appendix  G). 

Timber  harvest  and  road  construction  have  the 
potential  to  affect  aquatic  resources  in  several 
ways.  Poorly  designed  and  improperly  mitigated 
forest  transportation  systems  can  affect  both  resi- 
dent and  anadromous  fish  habitat  due  to  sediment 
being  deposited  directly  in  the  stream  (Yee  and 
Roelofs,  1980).  Improperly  designed  and  installed 
road  culverts  associated  with  stream  crossings 
can  be  barriers  to  fish  migration  due  to  outfall 
height,  excessive  water  velocities,  insufficient  wa- 
ter depths,  lack  of  resting  pools,  or  combinations 
of  these  factors  (Evans  and  Johnson,  1 980;  Yee 
and  Roelofs,  1980).  Proper  design  and  installation 
criteria  will  be  employed  to  ensure  unrestricted  fish 
passage  opportunities  when  culverts  are  em- 
ployed on  streams  containing  fish  populations.  Ri- 
parian vegetation  serves  an  important  role  in  stabi- 
lizing banks,  providing  stream  shade,  contributing 
organic  matter  and  terrestrial  insects  to  the 
stream,  and  serving  as  a buffer  against  sediment 
transport  into  streams  (Meehan  et  al,  1977;  Yee 
and  Roelofs,  1980).  Improper  timber  harvest  tech- 
niques which  remove  riparian  vegetation  or 
streamside  shade  trees  can  change  water  temper- 
atures and  adversely  affect  egg  incubation 
(Greene,  1950;  Chapman,  1962)  as  well  as  in- 
crease predation  and  reduce  preferred  juvenile 
salmonid  microhabitats  (Chapman,  1966;  Allen, 
1969). 

Site-specific  mitigation  measures  identified  in 
Chapter  II  of  this  FEIS  are  designed  to  specifically 
address  the  potential  sedimentation,  migration, 
and  riparian  impacts  of  forest  road  construction 
and  timber  harvest  activities  identified  above.  Im- 
plementation of  these  measures,  along  with  asso- 


ciated soil  and  water  Best  Management  Practices 
(BMPs)  are  expected  to  minimize  these  potential 
impacts  to  aquatic  habitats  of  the  Woodtick  and 
Moyer  Creek  drainage  system.  The  effectiveness 
of  these  measures  in  protecting  aquatic  habitats 
would  vary  between  alternatives,  however,  due  to 
differences  in  road  location  and  design,  as  well  as 
site  specific  logistical  constraints  to  full  implemen- 
tation of  specified  mitigation  measures.  These  dif- 
fering scenarios,  in  some  instances,  produce  dif- 
ferent risks  of  failure  to  adequately  maintain  one  or 
more  component  of  the  aquatic  environment. 
Where  these  differing  effects  occur,  variations  are 
discussed  by  alternative. 

The  anticipated  effects  of  the  various  action  alter- 
natives discussed  in  the  following  section  are 
based  on  the  assumption  that  fish  passage  prob- 
lems at  the  existing  crossing  of  Woodtick  Creek  by 
F.S.  Road  107  (Township  20  N,  Range  19  E,  Sec- 
tion 32)  (Figure  11-2)  would  be  corrected  if  an  action 
alternative  were  selected  and  would  not  be  cor- 
rected under  Alternative  1 , the  No  Action  Alterna- 
tive. 


EFFECTS  COMMON  TO  ALL  ACTION 
ALTERNATIVES 

Potential  impacts  to  fisheries  resources  in  the 
Woodtick  and  Moyer  Creek  drainages  would  be 
minimized  through  application  of  mitigation  mea- 
sures addressing  stream  sedimentation,  fish  mi- 
gration, and  riparian  zone  integrity  (Chapter  II,  Ta- 
ble 11-1).  All  action  alternatives  are  expected  to 
maintain  fish  migration  opportunities  and  riparian 
zone  integrity.  The  six  action  alternatives  have  dif- 
fering effects  upon  potential  stream  sedimentation 
within  the  Salt  Creek  drainage,  however.  Effects  to 
that  stream  habitat  parameter,  therefore,  are  dis- 
cussed by  alternative. 

An  existing  culvert  on  FS  Road  1 07  at  Township  20 
N,  Range  1 9 E,  Section  32  has  become  a high  flow 
passage  barrier  to  both  resident  and  anadromous 
fish  due  to  excessive  water  velocities.  Although 
only  four  of  the  seven  alternatives  require  recon- 
struction of  this  site  as  a component  of  their  re- 
spective transportation  packages,  fish  passage 
capabilities  for  existing  upper-drainage  bull  trout 
populations  and  potential  steelhead  populations 
would  be  restored  at  this  site  under  all  action  alter- 
natives. Funding  mechanisms  to  implement  re- 
quired reconstruction  or  replacement  of  this  struc- 


IV  - 14 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


ture,  however,  would  vary  by  alternative  (see 
Fisheries  Mitigations,  Table  11-1). 

Reconstruction  operations  at  this  Woodtick  Creek 
crossing  would  result  in  a temporary  increase  in 
water  turbidity  and  the  introduction  of  minor 
amounts  of  sediment  to  a localized  area  below  the 
culvert  site.  Installation  of  this  crossing  structure  in 
accordance  with  "Performance  Criteria  to  be  Ob- 
served to  Protect  Stream  Channels"  (FSM 
2505.1-2,  Appendix  B)  would  minimize  the  spatial 
and  temporal  scope  of  these  impacts. 

All  cutting  units  in  the  Woodtick,  Goodluck,  Salt, 
and  "Perm"  Creek  drainages  except  units  26 
through  30  in  the  "Perm"  Creek  drainage  and  unit 
21  at  the  head  of  the  Salt  Creek  Drainage  are  well 
removed  from  perennial  streamcourses.  Location 
of  these  units  away  from  the  streams  would  ensure 
surface  interception  of  harvest/yarding-related 
sediment  by  intervening  lands,  maintenance  of  ri- 
parian vegetation  integrity,  and  retention  of  ther- 
mal cover  to  aquatic  environments.  Those  cutting 
units  near  perennial  streams  in  the  Salt  and  "Perm" 
Creek  drainages  would  have  filter  strips  75  or  more 
feet  wide  between  perennial  waters  and  the  cut- 
ting units  to  preclude  sediment  introduction  and 
maintain  thermal  stream  cover,  as  prescribed  by 
slope  and  vegetative  cover  criteria  (BMPs,  Ap- 
pendix B). 

Harvest  operations  would  not  be  expected  to 
greatly  increase  water  yield  within  the  Woodtick 
Creek  drainage  under  any  of  the  proposed  action 
alternatives,  as  even  the  most  intensive  proposed 
cutting  prescription  would  harvest  only  3.0  percent 
of  this  basin  (See  Hydrology  Effects,  Table  IV-4). 
Previous  harvest  within  the  Woodtick  Creek 
drainage  has  impacted  an  additional  5.2  percent 
of  this  drainage,  bringing  the  total  affected 
drainage  portion  to  8.2  percent  under  maximum 
proposed  harvest.  This  level  of  disturbance  would 
be  substantially  below  the  20  to  30  percent  regard- 
ed as  capable  of  producing  greatly  increased  wa- 
ter yield  (Troendle  and  Leaf,  1980,  as  cited  by 
Troendle,  1982).  Alternative-specific  variations  in 
cutting  units  and  harvest  prescriptions  within  the 
smaller  Salt  and  "Perm"  Creek  drainages,  however, 
have  differing  potentials  to  increase  runoff  flow 
intensities  in  these  streams.  Although  no  major 
land  disturbing  activities  have  been  conducted  in 
these  drainage  in  recent  years,  various  Moyer  Salt 
harvest  proposals  encompass  between  4.5  and 
14.3  percent  of  the  Salt  Creek  drainage  and  be- 


tween 4.3  and  1 4.2  percent  of  the  "Perm’  Creek 
drainage.  Potential  effects  to  fisheries  resources  of 
varying  harvest  intensities  in  the  Salt  Creek  and 
'Perm'  Creek  drainages,  therefore,  will  be  dis- 
cussed by  alternative. 

All  new  specified  roads  constructed  to  access  pro- 
posed cutting  units  are  slated  for  year-round  clo- 
sure except  during  post-sale  open-access  fire- 
wood gathering  periods  (see  Wildlife  Mitigations, 
Table  11-1).  Long-term  angler  access  to  the  mid 
and  upper  reaches  of  Woodtick  Creek  would 
therefore  remain  essentially  unchanged  under  all 
action  alternatives. 


EFFECTS  BY  ALTERNATIVE 

Alternative  1 - No  Action 

No  road  construction  or  timber  harvest  activities 
would  be  implemented  under  this  alternative. 
There  would  be  no  direct  or  indirect  effects  on 
fisheries  resources  within  the  analysis  area  due  to 
activities  associated  with  timber  harvest.  The 
aquatic  habitats  of  Woodtick  Creek,  Goodluck 
Creek,  Salt  Creek,  and  "Perm"  Creek  would  remain 
generally  unchanged  from  conditions  described  in 
Chapter  III,  except  for  minor  natural  changes  in 
channel  structures  related  to  continued  introduc- 
tion of  large  woody  debris  as  trees  die  and  fall 
down.  Naturally-occurring  events  such  as  fire  or 
floods  may  cause  changes  to  fish  habitat  as  a 
result  of  vegetation  disturbance,  increases  in  flow, 
or  other  events.  Angler  access  and  harvest  of  resi- 
dent fish  species  in  Woodtick  Creek,  Goodluck 
Creek,  and  Salt  Creek  would  remain  essentially 
unchanged  from  current  levels.  Future  utilization  of 
steelhead  habitat  within  the  Woodtick  Creek 
drainage,  and  steelhead  and  Chinook  salmon 
habitat  within  the  Moyer  Creek  drainage  would  be 
dependent  upon  improvement  of  water  quality  in 
Panther  Creek.  Under  the  No  Action  Alternative, 
the  existing  culvert  at  the  crossing  of  Woodtick 
Creek  by  F.S.  Road  107  in  Township  20  N,  Range 
1 9 E,  Section  32  (Figure  11-1)  would  not  be  repaired 
or  replaced  through  timber-related  funding,  be- 
cause no  revenue  would  be  generated.  It  would 
continue  to  be  a barrier  to  upstream  migration  of 
both  anadromous  and  resident  fish  unless  sched- 
uled for  repair  or  replacement  via  Fisheries  Depart- 
ment project  funding,  by  the  Cobalt  Ranger  Dis- 
trict. 


IV- 15 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sale  Final  EBS 


Chapter  IV 


Alternative  2 

This  alternative  would  require  road  crossings  of 
Woodtick  Creek,  Goodluck  Creek,  Salt  Creek, 
“Perm"  Creek,  and  an  unnamed  tributary  of 
Woodtick  Creek.  Fish  passage  at  the  existing  road 
culvert  on  FS  Road  1 07  (Township  20  N,  Range  1 9 
E,  Section  32)  would  be  restored  in  association 
with  Knudson-Vandenberg  (KV)  funding,  while 
construction  design  would  maintain  fish  passage 
at  the  required  new  crossings  of  upper  Woodtick 
Creek  (Township  19  N,  Range  19  E,  Section  11) 
and  Goodluck  Creek  (same  lega!)(Figure  11-2).  Un- 
der the  transportation  system  associated  with  this 
alternative,  the  Salt  Creek  crossing  would  be  locat- 
ed in  the  headwaters  area  of  the  drainage  (Town- 
ship 19  N,  Range  19  E,  Section  16)(Figure  11-2). 
The  natural  diminished  aquatic  habitat  capability 
at  and  above  this  location  does  not  warrant  a 
crossing  design  which  would  ensure  fish  passage 
at  this  site.  A single  crossing  of  “Perm  Creek" 
would  be  required  in  Township  19  N,  Range  19  E, 
Section  1 7 (Figure  11-2)  under  this  alternative.  Fish 
passage  capability  would  not  be  maintained  at  this 
crossing  due  to  lack  of  aquatic  habitat  capability  at 
and  above  this  sites.  A crossing  structure  would 
additionally  be  required  across  an  unnamed  tribu- 
tary of  Woodtick  Creek  (Township  19  N,  Range  19 
E,  Section  10)(Figure  11-2).  Although  this  tributary 
is  live  at  the  proposed  crossing  location,  it  is  inter- 
mittent throughout  the  majority  of  its  length  and  is 
not  believed  to  support  fish  life.  Installation  of 
standard  culvert  designs  at  the  crossing  locations 
of  Salt  Creek,  "Perm"  Creek,  and  the  unnamed 
Woodtick  Creek  tributary  would  have  no  long-term 
impact  on  the  fisheries  resources  of  the  Moyer  or 
Woodtick  Creek  drainages.  Adherence  to  Forest 
Plan  standards  and  guidelines  would  minimize 
short-term  sediment  and  turbidity-related  impacts 
to  downstream  water  quality  during  construction 
activities  at  all  crossing  locations. 

BOISED  modeling  of  the  transportation  system 
and  harvest  prescriptions  associated  with  this  al- 
ternative indicates  that  sediment  delivery  rates  to 
Moyer  Creek  and  Woodtick  Creek  would  fall  within 
the  middle  of  the  range  predicted  for  the  array  of 
alternatives,  being  higher  than  the  predicted  rates 
for  Alternatives  1 and  5,  but  lower  than  the  rates 
predicted  for  Alternatives  3,  4,  and  6 (Table  IV-4). 
Mitigation  measures  identified  in  Chapter  II,  and 
applicable  soil  and  water  Best  Management  Prac- 
tices (BMPs)  are  expected  to  be  fully  successful  in 
protecting  the  aquatic  habitats  of  these  two 


drainages.  Results  and  interpretation  of  BOISED 
sediment  modeling  are  discussed  in  greater  detail 
within  the  Hydrology  Effects  section  of  this  docu- 
ment. 

Timber  harvest  activities  would  impact  9.1  percent 
of  the  Salt  Creek  drainage  and  1 1 .3  percent  of  the 
"Perm"  Creek  drainage  under  this  alternative.  As 
these  levels  of  basin  harvest  are  well  below  the  20 
to  30  percent  basin  harvest  threshold  levels  ob- 
served to  result  in  major  changes  in  annual  water 
yield  or  peak  flow  intensity  (Troendle  and  Leaf, 
1980,  as  cited  by  Troendle,  1982),  no  impacts  to 
the  natural  flow  regimes  of  these  streams  would  be 
expected  under  this  alternative. 

Alternative  3 

The  transportation  system  for  this  alternative 
would  require  two  crossings  of  “Perm"  Creek  rather 
than  the  single  crossing  required  under  Alternative 
2.  An  upper  crossing  would  be  located  in  Town- 
ship 1 9 N,  Range  1 9 E,  Section  1 7,  as  in  Alternative 
2,  and  a lower  crossing  would  be  located  in  Town- 
ship 19  N,  Range  19  E,  Section  18  (Figure  11-3). 
Fish  passage  would  not  be  maintained  at  either  of 
these  two  crossings,  due  to  the  lack  of  suitable  fish 
habitat  at  and  above  these  sites.  Crossing  loca- 
tions of  upper  Woodtick  Creek,  Goodluck  Creek, 
and  the  unnamed  Woodtick  Creek  tributary  would 
remain  as  described  for  Alternative  2,  with  fish  pas- 
sage capabilities  being  maintained  at  the  upper 
Woodtick  Creek  and  Goodluck  Creek  sites.  Fish 
passage  at  the  existing  FS  Road  107  culvert 
(Township  20  N,  Range  19  E,  Section  32,  Figure 
11-3)  would  be  restored  in  association  with  pre- 
scribed road  reconstruction  operations. 

This  alternative  would  additionally  relocate  the  Salt 
Creek  stream  crossing  to  Township  19  N,  Range 
1 9 E,  Section  7,  and  the  crossing  of  the  unnamed 
Woodtick  Creek  tributary  to  Township  19  N,  Range 
19  E,  Section  10  (Figure  11-3).  Because  it  would  be 
located  in  the  middle  reaches  of  the  drainage,  the 
Salt  Creek  stream  crossing  must  be  designed  to 
ensure  unrestricted  fish  passage  under  this  alter- 
native. 

Culvert  installation  operations  would  temporarily 
increase  water  turbidities  in  Woodtick  Creek, 
Goodluck  Creek,  the  unnamed  Woodtick  Creek 
tributary,  Salt  Creek  and  "Perm"  Creek  at  and  be- 
low these  crossing  locations  and  may  produce 
short-term  sediment  impacts  to  localized  areas  be- 


IV  - 16 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


low  these  sites.  Installation  of  these  crossing  struc- 
tures in  accordance  with  'Performance  Criteria  to 
be  Observed  to  Protect  Stream  Channels'  (FSM 
2505.1-2,  Appendix  B)  would  minimize  the  spatial 
and  temporal  scope  of  installation  impacts.  The 
narrow  valley  bottom  and  steep  sideslopes  adja- 
cent to  the  proposed  Salt  Creek  crossing  preclude 
flat,  perpendicular  approaches  to  this  site,  howev- 
er. Further,  these  steep  sideslopes  inhibit  the  im- 
plementation of  adequate  soil  and  water  mitigation 
measures  between  the  road  fill  slope  and  the  Salt 
Creek  stream  channel.  These  site  specific  limita- 
tions, coupled  with  the  determitation  of  BOISED, 
which  indicates  that  alternative  would  produce  the 
greatest  longterm  sediment  delivery  rates  of  the 
seven  alternatives  analyzed,  together  produce  an 
increased  risk  of  surface  erosion  and  conse- 
quently an  associated  increased  risk  of  failure  to 
continuously  meet  State  water  quality  standards 
within  Salt  Creek  stream  channel  (see  Hydrology 
discussion,  Chapter  IV).  As  this  crossing  is  located 
lower  in  the  Salt  Creek  drainage  than  those  pro- 
posed under  other  action  alternatives,  any  long 
term  stream  sedimentation  resulting  from 
unchecked  overland  erosion  would  impact  poten- 
tial rearing  habitats  within  that  stream  and,  to  a 
lesser  degree,  Moyer  Creek  below  the  confluence 
of  Salt  Creek. 

Under  this  alternative  timber  harvest  activities 
would  impact  4.5  percent  of  the  Salt  Creek 
drainage  and  11.3  percent  of  the  'Perm'  Creek 
drainage.  This  represents  the  lowest  level  of  har- 
vest within  the  Salt  Creek  drainage  of  the  six  alter- 
natives considered.  No  impacts  to  the  natural  flow 
regimes  of  either  Salt  Creek  or  Woodtick  Creek 
would  be  expected  at  these  disturbance  levels. 

Alternative  4 

The  transportation  system  associated  with  this  al- 
ternative utilizes  the  proposed  extension  of  F.S. 
Road  106,  as  in  Alternative  2,  reconstruction  of 
existing  F.S.  Road  107,  and  further  extension  of 
F.S.  Road  107  one  additional  mile  into  the 
Woodtick  Creek  and  Pete’s  Gulch  drainages  (Fig- 
ure 11-4).  Stream  crossing  locations  would  be  iden- 
tical to  those  described  for  Alternative  2.  Because 
the  additional  roading  required  under  this  alterna- 
tive is  located  entirely  on  upper-slope  portions  of 
the  Woodtick  Creek  and  Pete’s  Gulch  basins,  no 
additional  road-related  impacts  to  aquatic  re- 
sources would  be  anticipated  from  those  de- 
scribed under  Alternative  2. 


BOISED  modeling  of  the  effects  of  the  transporta- 
tion system  and  harvest  prescriptions  associated 
with  this  alternative  indicates  that  sediment  deliv- 
ery rates  to  Moyer  Creek  and  Woodtick  Creek 
would  be  the  second  highest  of  the  seven  alterna- 
tives analyzed.  Mitigation  measures  identified  in 
Chapter  II,  and  applicable  soil  and  water  Best  Man- 
agement Practices  (BMPs)  are,  however,  expected 
to  be  fully  successful  in  protecting  the  aquatic 
habitats  of  the  Woodtick  Creek  and  Moyer  Creek 
drainages.  Results  and  interpretation  of  BOISED 
sediment  modeling  are  discussed  in  greater  detail 
within  the  Hydrology  Effects  section  of  this  docu- 
ment. 

Timber  harvest  prescriptions  are  maximized  under 
this  alternative.  Potential  effects  to  fisheries  are 
primarily  related  to  possible  increases  in  peak  flow 
intensities  resulting  from  intensive  harvest  of  the 
Salt  Creek  and  "Perm*  Creek  drainages.  Proposed 
harvest  operations  under  this  alternative  would  en- 
compass 14.3  percent  of  the  Salt  Creek  drainage 
and  14.2  percent  of  the  "Perm'  Creek  drainage. 
While  the  most  intensive  of  the  various  harvest 
proposals,  basin  disturbance  under  this  alterna- 
tive would  not  approach  threshold  levels  observed 
to  result  in  major  increases  in  annual  wafer  yield 
and  peak  flow  intensity  (Troendle  and  Leaf,  1980, 
as  cited  by  Troendle,  1 982).  As  unmitigated  poten- 
tial sediment  impacts  to  Salt  Creek,  "Perm'  Creek, 
and  Moyer  Creek  from  increased  peak  flow 
intensity  are  not  anticipated,  implementation  of 
this  alternative  would  not  be  expected  to  adversely 
affect  fisheries  resources  within  the  Moyer  or 
Woodtick  Creek  drainage  systems. 

Alternative  5 

This  alternative  requires  the  least  new  roadbuild- 
ing of  the  six  action  alternatives.  Woodtick  Creek 
would  be  the  only  stream  crossed  by  the  associat- 
ed transportation  system.  Fish  passage  at  the  ex- 
isting culvert  at  Township  20  N,  Range  19  E,  Sec- 
tion 32  (Figure  11-5)  would  be  restored  in 
association  with  the  required  reconstruction  of  FS 
Road  1 07  associated  with  this  alternative. 

BOISED  sediment  modeling  results  for  this  combi- 
nation of  roads  and  cutting  units  indicate  that  this 
alternative  would  yield  the  second  lowest  amount 
of  sediment  to  the  Moyer  Creek  and  Woodtick 
Creek  drainages  of  the  seven  alternatives  ana- 
lyzed, and  the  lowest  amount  of  sediment  of  the  six 
action  alternatives.  Mitigation  measures  identified 


IV  - 17 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


in  Chapter  II,  and  applicable  soil  and  water  Best 
Management  Practices  (BMPs)  are  expected  to  be 
fully  successful  in  protecting  the  aquatic  habitats 
of  these  two  drainages.  Results  and  analysis  of 
BOISED  sediment  modeling  are  discussed  in 
greater  detail  within  the  Hydrology  section  of  this 
document. 

Under  this  alternative  timber  harvest  activities 
would  impact  5.1  percent  of  the  Salt  Creek 
drainage  and  4.3  percent  of  the  “Perm0  Creek 
drainage.  This  represents  the  lowest  level  of  har- 
vest within  the  “Perm'  Creek  drainage  and  the  sec- 
ond lowest  level  of  harvest  within  the  Salt  Creek 
drainage  of  the  six  alternatives.  No  impacts  to  the 
natural  flow  regimes  of  these  streams  would  be 
expected  at  these  disturbance  levels  (Troendle 
and  Leaf,  1980,  as  cited  by  Troendle,  1982). 

Alternative  © PREFERRED 

The  transportation  system  of  this  alternative  is 
identical  to  that  of  Alternative  4.  As  sediment  gen- 
erated by  road  construction  activities  comprises 
the  major  component  of  overall  yield,  land  disturb- 
ance reductions  associated  with  the  application  of 
diversified  forestry  harvest  strategies  within  units 
otherwise  scheduled  for  clearcutting  under  Alter- 
native 4 represents  a relatively  minor  factor  in  the 
overall  level  of  sediment  generation  under  this  al- 
ternative. The  predicted  BOISED  sediment  yield 
for  this  alternative,  as  a result,  would  be  essentially 
the  same  as  that  generated  under  Alternative  4 
(Table  IV-4).  As  with  Alternative  2,  mitigation  mea- 
sures identified  in  Chapter  II,  and  applicable  soil 
and  water  Best  Management  Practices  (BMPs), 
are  therefore  expected  to  be  fully  successful  in 
protecting  the  aquatic  habitats  of  the  Woodtick 
Creek  and  Moyer  Creek  drainages.  Results  and 
interpretation  of  BOISED  sediment  modeling  are 
discussed  in  greater  detail  within  the  Hydrology 
Effects  section  of  this  document. 

Proposed  harvest  operations  under  this  alternative 
would  encompass  12.3  percent  of  the  Salt  Creek 
drainage  and  13.1  percent  of  the  “Perm'  Creek 
drainage.  Due  to  the  reduction  of  harvest  within  1 5 
units  otherwise  slated  for  clearcutting,  this  alterna- 
tive represents  a 14.0  percent  reduction  in  Salt 
Creek  basin  harvest,  and  a 7.8  percent  reduction 
in  “Perm"  Creek  basin  harvest,  relative  to  alterna- 
tive 4.  As  with  alternative  4,  these  levels  of  basin 


harvest,  though  among  the  highest  of  the  alterna- 
tives considered,  do  not  approach  the  threshold 
levels  observed  to  result  in  major  changes  in  annu- 
al water  yield  or  peak  flow  intensity  (Troendle  and 
Leaf,  1980,  as  cited  by  Troendle,  1982). 

Alternative  2A 

The  transportation  system  of  this  alternative  is 
identical  to  that  of  Alternative  2.  As  with  that  alter- 
native, fish  passage  at  the  existing  road  culvert  on 
FS  Road  1 07  (Township  20  N,  Range  1 9 E,  Section 
32)  would  be  restored  through  Knudson- 
Vandenberg  (KV)  funding,  rather  than  in  direct  as- 
sociation with  road  reconstruction  operations. 

As  indicated  in  the  discussion  for  Alternative  6, 
sediment  generated  by  road  construction  activi- 
ties comprises  the  major  component  of  overall 
sediment  yield  from  timber  sale  activities.  Land 
disturbance  reductions  associated  with  the  appli- 
cation of  diversified  forestry  harvest  strategies 
within  units  otherwise  scheduled  for  clearcutting 
under  Alternative  4 therefore  represents  a rela- 
tively minor  factor  in  the  overall  level  of  sediment 
generation  under  this  alternative.  The  predicted 
BOISED  sediment  yield  for  this  alternative,  as  a 
result,  is  essentially  the  same  as  that  generated 
under  Alternative  2 (Table  IV-4).  As  with  Alternative 
2,  mitigation  measures  identified  in  Chapter  II,  and 
applicable  soil  and  water  Best  Management  Prac- 
tices (BMPs),  are  therefore  expected  to  be  fully 
successful  in  protecting  the  aquatic  habitats  of  the 
Woodtick  Creek  and  Moyer  Creek  drainages.  Re- 
sults and  interpretation  of  BOISED  sediment  mod- 
eling are  discussed  in  greater  detail  within  the  Hy- 
drology Effects  section  of  this  document. 

Proposed  harvest  operations  under  this  alternative 
would  encompass  8.2  percent  of  the  Salt  Creek 
drainage  and  10.4  percent  of  the  “Perm"  Creek 
drainage.  Due  to  the  reduction  of  harvest  within  21 
units  otherwise  slated  for  clearcutting,  this  alterna- 
tive represents  a 9.9  percent  reduction  in  Salt 
Creek  basin  harvest,  and  a 8.0  percent  reduction 
in  “Perm'  Creek  basin  harvest,  relative  to  Alterna- 
tive 2.  As  with  alternative  2,  these  levels  of  basin 
harvest  are  well  below  the  threshold  levels  ob- 
served to  result  in  major  changes  in  annual  water 
yield  or  peak  flow  intensity  (Troendle  and  Leaf, 
1980,  as  cited  by  Troendle,  1982). 


IV-  18 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


CUMULATIVE  EFFECTS 

Harvest  operations  within  the  Woodtick  Creek 
drainage  associated  with  the  1 988  Tick  Creek  Tim- 
ber Sale  have  impacted  23  percent  of  the  Little 
Woodtick  Creek  drainage.  Post-sale  field  review  of 
the  area  by  the  Forest  Hydrologist  in  1 991  indicat- 
ed that  an  increase  in  water  yield  directly  at- 
tributable to  intensive  timber  harvest  had  pro- 
duced deleterious  sedimentation  in  Little  Woodtick 
Creek  below  the  sale  area  (see  Chapter  III,  Affect- 
ed Environment,  Hydrology).  Sedimentation  ef- 
fects appeared  to  be  confined  to  Little  Woodtick 
Creek  and  were  not  believed  to  have  impacted 
fish-bearing  waters  of  mainstem  Woodtick  Creek. 
The  increased  water  yield  observed  in  Little 
Woodtick  Creek  as  a result  of  intensive  harvest 
within  that  drainage  is  not  thought  to  have  pro- 
duced any  measurable  effects  on  the  intensity  or 
timing  of  peak  flows  in  mainstem  Woodtick  Creek, 
due  to  dissimilarities  in  the  timing  of  runoff  in  the 
two  streams. 

This  23  percent  disturbance  of  the  Little  Woodtick 
Creek  drainage  corresponds  to  5.2  percent  of  the 
total  Woodtick  Creek  drainage.  The  various  timber 
harvest  prescriptions  proposed  under  the  Moyer 
Salt  timber  sale  would  impact  an  additional  1.8  to 
3.0  percent  of  the  total  Woodtick  Creek  drainage, 
bringing  cumulative  land  disturbance  within  the 
drainage  to  7.0  to  8.2  percent.  As  this  level  of 
disturbance  would  be  substantially  below  the  20  to 
30  percent  regarded  as  capable  of  producing 
greatly  increased  water  yield  (Troendle  and  Leaf, 
1980,  as  cited  by  Troendle,  1982),  no  further  fish- 
eries impacts  related  to  cumulative  land  disturb- 
ance in  the  Woodtick  Creek  drainage  would  be 
anticipated  under  any  of  the  proposed  Moyer  Salt 
action  alternatives. 

Reasonably  foreseeable  future  activities  within  the 
analysis  area  include  timber  stand  improvement 
(TSI)  operations  within  all  shelterwood  units,  post 
and  pole  sales,  and  public  firewood  salvage.  No 
additional  road  construction  would  be  needed  to 
implement  these  post-sale  activities,  and  no  new 
commercial  sawtimber  sales  are  proposed  within 
the  analysis  area  within  the  current  planning  peri- 
od. Consequently,  cumulative  impacts  to  aquatic 
habitats  encompassing  post-sale  activities  would 
be  limited  to  those  described  in  the  preceding 
sections.  Only  a very  minor  and  short-lived  in- 
crease in  consumptive  harvest  of  resident  fish 
would  be  expected  in  association  with  open- 


access  public  firewood  gathering  in  the  Woodtick 
Creek  area. 

CONSISTENCY  WITH  FOREST  PLAN 
STANDARDS  AND  GUIDELINES 

All  action  alternatives  except  Alternative  3 are  ex- 
pected to  provide  a level  of  fish  habitat  protection 
consistent  with  Forest  Plan  guidelines  of  providing 
for  maintenance  of  State  water  quality  goals  and 
retention  of  spawning  and  rearing  habitats  for  resi- 
dent and  anadromous  species  at  90  percent  of 
inherent  potential.  Alternative  3 exhibits  an  high 
inherent  risk  of  failure  to  meet  water  quality  stand- 
ards, due  to  the  site  specific  inability  to  adequately 
protect  water  quality  and  stream  substrates  in  the 
vicinity  of  the  proposed  Salt  Creek  crossing  site. 
Additionally,  Alternative  1,  the  no  action  alterna- 
tive, is  not  consistent  with  Forest  Plan  guidelines 
because  under  this  alternative  the  current  fish  pas- 
sage problem  on  Woodtick  Creek  would  most 
likely  continue.  No  funding  mechanisms  to  correct 
it  would  be  implemented  under  this  alternative. 
This  barrier  could  be  corrected  at  another  time. 

EFFECTS  TO  BSOLOGSCAL  DIVERSITY 


Effects  of  the  Proposal 

A complete  analysis  of  the  effects  of  the  proposed 
alternatives  for  this  timber  sale  on  biological  diver- 
sity and  related  topics  are  contained  elsewhere  in 
this  document  [see  Biological  Diversity  (Appendix 
H,  Section  II),  Wildlife  and  Fisheries  Section  of  this 
chapter  and  the  Biological  Evaluations  (Appendix 
G)  and  Assessments  (Appendix  F]  of  the  FEIS.  A 
short  synopsis  of  the  most  significant  of  those  find- 
ings is  provided  here. 

Changes  In  diversity  due  to  changes  In  plant 
communities: 

The  Moyer  Salt  Timber  sale  area  is  located  in 
Douglas-fir  communities  at  mid-slope  and  lodge- 
pole  pine  and  subalpine  fir  communities  at  upper 
slope  positions  in  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape.  The 
largest  of  the  proposed  harvest  alternatives  will 
occur  on  approximately  2%  of  the  Moyer  Salt 
Landscape.  All  of  the  action  alternatives  will  har- 
vest trees  in  mature  and  immature  Douglas-fir,  ma- 
ture and  immature  mixed  conifer  and  lodgepole 
pine,  and  pole-sized  mixed  conifer  stands. 


IV- 19 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Flnai  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


Areas  that  the  alternatives  would  clearcut  harvest 
trees  on  would  increase  the  amount  of  seedling/ 
sapling  habitat  in  patches  up  to  40  acres.  Areas 
that  the  alternatives  would  employ  the  shelter- 
wood  and  irregular  shelterwood  harvest  technique 
on  would  produce  scattered  seedling/sapling 
habitat  in  small  patches  throughout  larger  treat- 
ment units  (up  to  95  acres).  This  should  result  in 
the  establishment  of  plant  and  animal  associations 
similar  to  those  found  in  mature  Douglas-fir  com- 
munities after  a low  to  moderate  intensity  fire  has 
occurred. 

The  ecological  result  of  these  two  techniques  is 
that  the  clearcuts  would  produce  habitat  markedly 
different  in  plant  structure  and  animal  composition 
than  found  in  the  current  existing  condition  or  in 
the  surrounding  area  In  addition,  the  ’edge  effect" 
produced  would  be  greatest  where  the  clearcut 
harvest  technique  is  used.  There  would  be  a 
marked  increase  in  grass  and  forbs  in  these  units 
and  "pioneering"  animals  like,  white-footed  deer 
mice,  least  chipmunks,  chipping  sparrows,  and 
red-tailed  hawks  would  increase.  All  of  these 
species  are  already  relatively  abundant  because 
they  are  adapted  to  a wide  range  of  habitats  and 
plant  communities  that  are  quite  common. 

The  irregular  shelterwood  harvest  technique  will 
support  plant  and  animal  communities  more  like 
those  existing  in  the  landscape  today.  As  a result, 
the  contrast  between  harvest  units  and  the  habitat 
surrounding  the  harvest  units  will  be  less.  There- 
fore, the  “edge-effect"  will  be  less  pronounced  than 
would  occur  with  other  harvest  techniques. 
Species  which  occur  in  Douglas-fir  habitats  of  the 
age  proposed  for  harvest  in  the  Moyer  Salt  timber 
sale  include:  hermit  thrushes,  western  tanagers, 
pine  marten,  red-backed  voles,  and  red  squirrels. 
These  species  are  abundant  only  where  native 
mature  and  old  conifer  trees  occur. 

Species  which  depend  on  mature  to  old  growth 
stands  with  closed  canopies,  for  instance 
goshawks  which  nest  in  such  stands,  will  not  be 
able  to  use  harvest  units  until  the  stands  mature. 
However,  these  harvest  units  will  develop  old 
growth  characteristics  more  quickly  than  units  that 
have  been  clearcut. 

Effects  on  travel  corridors: 

All  of  the  action  alternatives,  except  the  helicopter 
alternative  (Alternative  5),  would  facilitate  move- 


ment of  humans  and  some  plants  and  animals 
between  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  and  the  adja- 
cent eastern  landscape,  Iron  Lake  Landscape  (see 
Figure  111-2  Landscape  Boundary  Map)  because  of 
the  road  corridor  connecting  the  two.  In  addition  to 
resident  mid-  to  big-sized  animals,  rare  species 
like  wolves,  wolverines  and  lynx  could  also  use  this 
travel  corridor.  The  permanent  roads  proposed  in 
all  but  the  helicopter  alternative  would  result  in  a 
loss  of  small  areas  of  terrestrial  and  aquatic  habi- 
tat. 

The  alternatives  proposing  the  use  of  clearcut  with 
islands,  shelterwood  and  irregular  shelterwood 
harvest  technique  would  produce  plant  communi- 
ties that  more  closely  resemble  the  surrounding 
plant  communities,  thus  leaving  some  cover.  It  is 
thought  that  these  units  will  disrupt  the  movement 
of  animals  through  harvest  areas  less  than  units 
which  are  clearcut.  However,  even  under  the  alter- 
natives that  propose  only  the  clearcutting  tech- 
nique of  harvest,  the  forested  corridor  would  not 
be  completely  severed.  In  fact  most  of  the  forested 
cover  would  still  remain  even  for  Alternative  4, 
which  would  clearcut  the  most  area  (645  acres) 
and  only  results  in  removing  cover  from  approxi- 
mately 2%  of  the  entire  Moyer  Salt  Landscape. 

Unique  habitats: 

Old  growth  habitat  will  be  reduced  by  all  of  the 
action  alternatives  in  this  proposal.  Under  Alterna- 
tive 4,  which  harvests  the  most  old  growth,  there 
would  be  a 1 5%  reduction  of  acres  which  have  old 
growth  characteristics  in  the  Woodtick  and  Salt 
Creek  drainages,  other  drainages  in  the  Moyer 
Salt  Landscape  would  not  be  affected.  No  old 
growth  protection  stands  (see  Figure  181-3,  Old 
Growth  Retention  Areas)  would  be  harvested.  Al- 
ternatives which  propose  clearcutting  would  result 
in  harvest  units  that  will  not  have  mature  to  old 
conifers,  or  the  animals  associated  with  them,  for 
over  1 20  years.  However,  for  the  areas  that  alterna- 
tives propose  harvesting  trees  by  the  shelterwood 
or  even  more  so  by  the  irregular  shelterwood  tech- 
nique, some  old  growth  characteristics  (large  old 
trees,  snags  and  downed  logs)  will  remain  after 
harvest.  It  is  expected  that  the  animal  and  plant 
communities  which  would  use  these  units  would 
more  closely  resemble  those  found  in  mature  to 
old  Douglas-fir  stands  elsewhere  in  the  landscape. 

Because  harvest  units  are  located  well  away  from 
wetlands,  riparian  corridors  would  only  be  affected 


IV  -20 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


by  the  proposed  alternatives  under  which  roads 
are  constructed  across  creeks.  Mitigations  which 
address  disturbance  and  recovery  of  riparian  ar- 
eas at  the  proposed  road  crossing  are  included  in 
all  alternatives.  None  the  less,  at  each  crossing  a 
permanent  loss  of  small  areas  of  wetland  will  oc- 
cur. The  Preferred  Alternative  (Alternative  6), 
would  effect  approximately  3 acres  of  wetlands. 
The  helicopter  alternative  would  have  no  effect  on 
wetlands. 

Effects  on  rare  species: 

The  National  Forest  Management  Act  of  1 976  di- 
rects the  USFS  to  provide  for  the  maintenance  of 
viable  populations  of  native  and  desired  non- 
native vertebrate  species  and  the  recovery  of  listed 
species.  The  effects  of  Forest  management  activi- 
ties on  TEPS  species  are  evaluated  by  how  the 
activity  might  change  the  viability  of  the  species  on 
the  Salmon  National  Forest.  Viability  in  this  sense 
means  the  probability  that  the  species  will  contin- 
ue to  exist  on  the  Forest.  The  Biological  Evaluation 
and  Assessment  for  TEPS  which  occur  on  the 
Salmon  National  Forest  indicate  that  the  manage- 
ment activities  proposed  for  the  Moyer  Salt  Land- 
scape will  not  adversely  affect  the  viability  of 
species  indigenous  to  the  Salmon  National  Forest. 


VEGETATION  EFFECTS 

Timber  management  activities  directly  and  indi- 
rectly affect  the  vegetative  diversity  and  the  timber 
resources  of  the  analysis  area  by  modifying  com- 
ponents such  as  the  species  abundance  and  dis- 
tribution; structural  and  age  diversity;  and  the 
overall  health  of  the  forest,  including  insect  and 
disease  infestation  and  the  potential  for  wildfires. 

All  action  alternatives  propose  use  of  the  shelter- 
wood  and  clearcut  silvicultural  systems  or  modifi- 
cations of  those  systems.  Prescribed  treatments 
are  the  same  for  Alternatives  2,  3,  and  4.  Initial 
effects  to  vegetation  would  be  similar  for  these 
alternatives.  Effects  to  vegetation  would  vary 
slightly  for  Alternatives  5,  6,  and  2A  due  to  heli- 
copter logging  (Alternative  5)  and  leaving  islands 
in  the  clearcuts  (Alternatives  6 and  2A).  The  main 
differences  between  all  alternatives  are  the  size 
and  location  of  the  cutting  units,  and  the  number 
of  acres  harvested.  These  factors  directly  affect 
the  relative  ability  to  improve  growth,  health,  and 


vigor  of  timber  stands  through  implementation  of 
silvicultural  treatments.  Where  the  visual  quality 
objective  is  partial  retention,  many  of  the  clearcuts 
will  be  limited  to  1 5 acres  in  size  while  shelterwood 
units  may  be  limited  to  25  acres  in  size.  In  addition, 
removal  of  adjacent  stands  (leave  strips)  would  be 
delayed  until  the  first  entry  units  have  regenerated 
to  an  average  height  of  22-25  feet.  Please  refer  to 
EFFECTS  BY  ALTERNATIVE  in  this  chapter  for  a 
detailed  description  of  the  effects  by  alternative. 

Changes  in  the  vegetative  characteristics  in  the 
analysis  area  due  to  implementation  of  the  alterna- 
tives are  described  in  this  section.  Changes  in 
vegetative  diversity  are  discussed  in  terms  of 
changes  to  forest  succession,  species  abundance 
and  distribution,  and  stand  structure.  Changes  to 
the  timber  resource  are  discussed  in  terms  of 
changes  to  the  age  class  distribution  of  the  forest, 
effects  to  insect  and  disease  susceptibility,  effects 
to  noxious  weeds,  and  fire  management. 


EFFECTS  TO  VEGETATIVE  DIVERSITY 

Changes  to  the  vegetative  diversity  in  the  Moyer 
Salt  analysis  area  would  occur  under  the  no  action 
alternative  (Alternative  1)  and  under  all  of  the  ac- 
tion alternatives.  If  no  timber  harvesting  or  natural 
events  that  would  disrupt  the  stands  were  to  take 
place,  the  trees  in  the  area  would  continue  to  age 
and  die,  and  the  species  composition  of  the 
stands  would  slowly  change.  As  trees  in  the  over- 
story die  and  fall  down,  more  shade-tolerant  trees 
in  the  understory  would  become  the  dominant  tree 
species  on  the  site.  Changes  would  also  occur  in 
the  understory  structure  and  in  the  distribution 
and  abundance  of  other  understory  species. 

The  timber  harvest  activities  proposed  for  the  ac- 
tion alternatives  would  change  the  existing  vege- 
tive  diversity.  Older  trees  would  be  cut  and  the 
harvested  stand  would  be  replaced  by  a stand  of 
young  trees  that  have  a different  structure  and  that 
may  have  a different  species  mixture  than  the  ex- 
isting stand.  Stands  would  be  regenerated  natu- 
rally from  trees  left  on  the  site  or  from  trees  in 
neighboring  stands.  Seeding  of  shrubs,  grasses, 
forbs,  and  other  plant  species  would  occur  from 
neighboring  stands  or  would  be  carried  to  the  site 
by  wind,  birds,  and  other  sources.  Sprouting  from 
roots  of  plants  already  present  on  the  site  would 
also  occur.  In  the  unlikely  event  that  natural  regen- 
eration fails,  the  stand  would  be  planted  with 


IV  -21 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  E1S 


Chapter  IV 


seedlings  grown  from  local  seed  sources.  The  ge- 
netic diversity  of  plants  and  trees  would  be  main- 
tained by  these  events. 

The  even-aged  silvicultural  system  and  the 
clearcut  and  shelterwood  cutting  methods  pro- 
posed for  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  were  select- 
ed as  the  preferred  harvesting  methods  because 
not  only  are  they  environmentally  sound  and  eco- 
nomically efficient  but  they  reproduce  the  natural 
events  that  would  occur  in  the  area.  The  present 
condition  of  the  forest  communities  on  the  site  are 
the  product,  in  part,  of  the  fire  history  of  the  area. 
Lodgepole  pine,  the  dominant  tree  species  in  the 
area,  is  a fire-dependent  species.  Where  the  natu- 
ral fire  cycle  has  been  interrupted  by  fire  suppres- 
sion activities,  these  trees  are  no  longer  growing  or 
are  dying. 

Habitat  Types 

Habitat  types  are  a permanent  measure  of  the 
potential  climax  vegetation  which  occurs  on  a site 
and  the  site  potential.  Thus,  no  alternatives  would 
change  the  habitat  types.  The  different  harvest 
treatments  would,  however,  change  the  succes- 
sional  stage  of  a particular  habitat  type.  Even-aged 
harvest  methods,  including  clearcutting  and  modi- 
fied shelterwood  cutting,  would  return  the  stand  to 
an  earlier  successional  stage  (see  the  following 
section  on  successional  stages  for  more  discus- 
sion). Each  action  alternative  harvests  approxi- 
mately the  same  percent  of  each  habitat  type. 
However,  all  action  alternatives  cut  more  of  the 
subalpine  fir  habitat  series  than  the  Douglas-fir 
habitat  series. 

No  unique  or  special  habitat  types  would  be  har- 
vested under  any  of  the  action  alternatives. 

Forest  Succession 

For  the  no  action  alternative  as  well  as  for  all  areas 
not  proposed  for  timber  harvest,  changes  to  forest 
succession  will  slowly  occur  in  the  absence  of  any 
major  vegetation  disturbing  events.  Mixed  conifer 
stands  on  the  subalpine  fir  habitat  types  are  in  Sate 
successional  stages.  Here  the  serai  species  are 
dying  out  and  being  replaced  by  the  climax 
species  of  subalpine  fir.  The  subalpine  fir  habitat 
types  that  are  occupied  solely  by  lodgepole  pine 
are  in  an  earlier  successional  stage  but  will  eventu- 
ally evolve  into  a climax  stage.  The  Douglas-fir 


habitat  types  that  are  occupied  by  Douglas  fir 
trees  are  in  a late-successional  or  climax  stage. 

All  action  alternatives  would  alter  the  existing  suc- 
cessional stages  in  areas  that  are  cut.  The  even- 
aged  harvest  treatments  proposed  for  all  of  the 
action  alternatives  would  change  the  successional 
stage  of  the  areas  cut  from  mid  or  late- 
successional  stages  to  an  early  successional 
stage.  These  changes  in  successional  stage  will 
vary  with  habitat  type;  in  some  habitat  types  not 
only  will  the  age  and  condition  class  change  with 
harvesting,  but  the  dominant  trees  species  on  the 
site  will  also  change.  For  example,  the  mixed  coni- 
fer stands  on  the  subalpine  fir  habitat  types  are 
nearing  climax  and  are  presently  occupied  by  tim- 
ber stands  with  an  overstory  composed  of  roughly 
equal  amounts  of  lodgepole  pine  and  subalpine  fir 
with  minor  amounts  of  Douglas-fir  and  Englemann 
spruce.  After  harvest,  the  stands  that  reforest  the 
site  will,  depending  on  seed  sources,  post  harvest 
treatments,  and  other  factors,  be  dominated  by  the 
serai  species,  lodgepole  pine  (greater  amounts  of 
Engelmann  spruce  and  subalpine  fir  could  be  ex- 
pected in  clearcuts  where  uncut  islands  are  re- 
tained - Alternatives  6 and  2A). 

On  Douglas-fir  habitat  types  that  are  currently  oc- 
cupied by  Douglas-fir  with  minor  logepole  pine 
and  subalpine  fir,  the  trees  that  reforest  the  site 
would  be  comprised  of  mostly  Douglas-fir  with 
variable  amounts  of  lodgepole  pine,  depending  on 
seed  source.  Where  machine  scarification  and 
slash  piling  is  infeasible  due  to  lack  of  road  access 
(Alternative  5 - helicopter  yarding),  pinegrass  will 
be  expected  to  increase  following  harvest  eventu- 
ally forming  a dense  sod.  The  establishment  of  this 
sod  could  delay  regeneration  for  20  years  or 
longer.  Regeneration  that  does  become  estab- 
lished would  be  comprised  of  a higher  percentage 
of  Douglas-fir  than  where  scarification  was  per- 
formed. 

Condition  Class 

All  action  alternatives  would  change  the  age  and 
condition  class  of  the  harvested  units.  Stands  that 
are  currently  mature  and  overmature  would  be 
converted  to  a younger  grass/forb/shrub  condition 
class.  On  sites  where  the  younger  trees  are  re- 
tained, such  as  the  shelterwood  units  that  will  have 
an  overstory  removal  cut,  the  condition  class  will 
be  converted  to  a seedling/sapling  or  pole  class, 
depending  on  the  age  and  size  of  the  trees  that  are 


IV  - 22 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


retained.  Shelterwood  sites  with  leave  trees  would 
have  a multi-story  structure  for  several  years  after 
harvest;  these  areas  would  contain  a grass/forb/ 
shrub  condition  class  interspersed  with  mature 
trees. 

EFFECTS  TO  SPECIES  AND  STRUCTURAL  DI- 
VERSITY 

Species  Diversity 

Timber  harvest  would  change  the  abundance  and 
distribution  of  tree  species  within  the  analysis 
area.  As  discussed  above,  the  stands  that  regen- 
erate within  the  harvested  units  would  have  a dif- 
ferent species  composition  than  those  that  are 
growing  on  the  site  at  present,  depending  on  the 
successional  stage  and  habitat  type  present  on 
the  site.  In  addition,  the  vegetation  that  would  grow 
on  the  harvested  sites  would  include  pioneer 
species  such  as  fireweed  and  species  that  are 
adapted  to  open  environments.  New  growth  that 
occurs  would  contain  a higher  percentage  of 
grasses,  forbs  and  shrubs  than  existing  stands. 
Seeding  of  road  surfaces  and  cut  and  fill  slopes  for 
erosion  control  could  also  slightly  change  the 
grass  and  forb  species  composition.  Persistence 
of  existing  plant  species  and  other  biota  would 
depend  on  site  preparation  and  other  manage- 
ment activities  as  well  as  the  species’  adaptability 
to  an  open  environment.  Grasses,  forbs  and 
shrubs  in  the  understory  would  be  exposed  to 
increased  light  and  available  moisture  with  re- 
moval or  partial  removal  of  the  overstory.  Species 
abundance  and  distribution  could  also  change  if 
post-harvest  stand  management  selects  one  tree 
species  over  another. 

These  changes  to  plant  species  and  abundance 
would  not  only  affect  the  vegetation  resource  but 
would  favor  wildlife  that  are  adapted  to  a more 
open  habitat.  Many  plant  species  that  are  impor- 
tant big-game  forage  would  be  favored. 

Lodgepole  pine  would  generally  be  managed  for 
on  subalpine  fir  habitat  types  currently  supporting 
the  lodgepole  pine/mixed  conifer  stands  de- 
scribed in  Chapter  III.  Regenerated  clearcut  units 
would  contain  a higher  percentage  of  lodgepole 
pine  than  present  mixed  conifer  stands.  However, 
where  subalpine  fir  or  Engelmann  spruce  occur 
naturally  in  the  regenerated  stand,  they  would  be 
retained  to  maintain  species  diversity.  Large- 
diameter  live  Douglas-fir  and  subalpine  fir  retained 


in  the  units  as  recruitment  snags  would  contribute 
to  species  diversity  and  provide  a seed  source  for 
regenerating  those  species. 

Shelterwood  harvest  units  would  have  the  same 
approximate  species  composition  that  is  present 
in  current  stand  conditions,  with  a possible  slight 
increase  in  the  amount  of  lodgepole  pine. 

In  general,  changes  in  species  composition  of  the 
analysis  area  as  a whole  would  be  small  because 
of  the  large  size  of  the  project  area  and  the  rela- 
tively small  acreage  of  ground-disturbing  activities 
proposed. 

Structural  Diversity 

Structural  diversity  would  be  affected  primarily 
within  timber  harvest  units,  which  make  up  be- 
tween 1.9  and  5.5  percent  of  the  analysis  area 
(Table  IV-5).  The  remaining  94-98%  of  the  analysis 
area  would  continue  to  have  structural  diversity 
provided  by  riparian  areas,  natural  openings,  old 
growth  retention  stands,  stands  unsuitable  for  tim- 
ber management,  and  inaccessible  areas. 

The  proposed  shelterwood  and  clearcutting  har- 
vest methods  create  even-aged  timber  stands.  If 
they  develop  uniformly  they  would  be  less  struc- 
turally diverse  than  the  existing  uneven-aged 
stands  that  occur  within  the  analysis  area  that 
have  a mix  of  canopy  layers  and  an  abundance  of 
snags  and  downed  logs. 

Vertical  diversity  within  clearcut  units  would  be 
greatly  reduced  following  timber  harvest.  Existing 
snags  and  recruitment  snags  would  be  main- 
tained within  harvest  units  in  accordance  with  For- 
est Plan  direction,  thereby  maintaining  some  verti- 
cal diversity  (Alternatives  2,  3, 4,  5,).  Clearcuts  that 
contain  uncut  islands  (Alternatives  6 and  2A) 
would  provide  greater  vertical  diversity  than  those 
where  only  snags  or  retention  trees  are  left.  Some 
structural  diversity  would  also  be  provided  by 
maintaining  10-15  tons  per  acre  of  large  woody 
debris.  From  a landscape  perspective  the  regener- 
ated clearcuts  would  eventually  form  a mosaic  of 
relatively  even-aged  stands  that  follow  natural  pat- 
terns and  avoid  geometric  shapes.  As  the  regener- 
ated stands  grow  in  height  they  would  take  on  an 
appearance  similar  to  the  even-aged  pole-sized 
lodgepole  pine  stands  described  in  Chapter  III. 
Post-sale  timber  stand  improvement  activities 
such  as  thinning  and  removal  of  dead  and  dam- 


IV -23 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sale  Final  EGS 


Chapter  IV 


aged  trees  would  occur  in  the  regenerated  stands 
at  a relatively  young  age  in  order  to  maintain  tree 
and  stand  vigor.  As  a result,  these  stands  would 
have  a more  8open  grown"  appearance  than  the 
fire  regenerated  stands. 

The  extent  to  which  vertical  diversity  would  be 
modified  in  the  shelterwood  units  would  directly 
correlate  with  natural  stand  conditions  (the  pres- 
ence of  existing  regeneration)  and  the  variation  of 
shelterwood  method  used  i.e.  standard  shelter- 
wood  vs.  group  shelterwood.  Where  the  standard 
shelterwood  is  employed  approximately  1 2 to  27 
trees  per  acre  of  the  healthiest  dominant  and  co- 
dominant trees  would  be  left  to  shelter  the  site  and 
produce  new  seedlings  (within  10  to  15  years). 
Once  the  seedlings  are  established,  the  majority  of 
the  remaining  overstory  would  be  removed  leaving 
3-5  large  diameter  trees  for  us  by  raptor  and  cavity 
nesters.  Thus  vertical  diversity  in  this  stand  condi- 
tion is  relatively  low  consisting  of  primarily 
Douglas-fir  seedlings  overtopped  by  a few  old 
growth  trees. 

Vertical  diversity  is  essentially  maximized  in  both 
the  group  and  irregular  shelterwood  methods. 
Stands  treated  using  these  methods  will  be  com- 
posed of  four  age  structures  in  small,  even-aged 
groups.  For  example,  following  the  removal  cut  of 
the  shelterwood  the  stand  would  have  four  vertical 
components:  1)  regeneration  less  than  three  feet 
tall  as  a result  of  the  shelterwood  seed  cut;  2) 
existing  Douglas-fir  saplings  1 0-1 5 feet  tall  which 
released  after  the  first  entry;  3)  existing  pole-sized 
and  immature  sawtimber  which  released  after  the 
first  entry;  and  4)  large  diameter  snags  and  recruit- 
ment snags  left  in  accordance  with  Forest  Plan 
direction  of  the  shelterwood  would  be  made  leav- 
ing three  to  five  large  trees  per  acre  for  snag  re- 
placement or  future  harvest. 

In  stands  where  there  are  healthy  young  trees  on 
the  site  that  will  grow  if  competing  trees  are  re- 
moved, a group  shelterwood  method  would  be 
implemented  (designated  as  group  shelterwood 
on  the  stand  maps).  When  this  method  is  pro- 
posed it  is  characterized  by  three  distinct  compo- 
nents: 1)  a Douglas-fir  overstory  with  an  understo- 
ry of  Douglas-fir  seedlings  and  saplings  ranging 
from  two  to  six  feet  tall;  2)  a Douglas-fir  overstory 
with  an  occasional  clump  of  regeneration  but  gen- 
erally park-like  in  appearance;  3)  thick  patches  of 
advanced  Douglas-fir  regeneration  (pole  size  ma- 


terial 3.0  to  8.9  inches  DBH.  These  three  compo- 
nents create  a mosaic  of  even-aged  groups. 

The  objective  of  the  group  shelterwood  method  is 
to  maintain  these  components  as  even-aged 
groups,  thereby  replicating  nature’s  reproduction 
system.  In  the  initial  entry,  this  method  takes  ad- 
vantage of  the  existing  regeneration  where  a suit- 
able understory  is  present.  The  removal  cut  of  the 
shelterwood  would  be  performed  to  release  exist- 
ing regeneration.  Where  regeneration  is  lacking 
the  seed  cut,  a shelterwood  would  be  implement- 
ed removing  approximately  50  to  70  percent  of  the 
overstory  depending  on  site  conditions. 

The  remaining  "leave  trees"  would  be  expected  to 
regenerate  the  unstocked  openings  within  1 0 to  1 5 
years.  Once  regeneration  was  established,  a re- 
moval out  of  the  shelterwood  would  be  made  leav- 
ing three  to  five  large  trees  per  acre  for  snag  re- 
placement trees. 

Shelterwood  Harvest  (Alternatives  5,  6 and  2A) 
In  order  to  meet  visual  quality  objectives  and  miti- 
gate other  resource  concerns,  many  of  the  units  in 
Alternatives  5,  6,  and  2A  will  be  treated  utilizing  a 
modified  irregular  shelterwood  system  (designat- 
ed irregular  shelterwood  on  the  alternative  maps). 
This  method  would  be  initially  similar  to  the  stand- 
ard and  group  shelterwood  methods  described  for 
Alternatives  2,  3 and  4.  The  primary  difference  is 
that  the  shelterwood  trees  are  retained  longer  than 
necessary  for  seedling  establishment  thus  delay- 
ing the  timing  of  the  second  entry  into  the  stand. 
The  removal  cut  (second  entry)  of  the  shelterwood 
would  not  be  performed  until  the  average  height  of 
the  regeneration  is  approximately  20  feet.  The  re- 
moval cut  would  therefore  occur  approximately  20 
to  30  years  after  the  seed  cut  as  compared  to  1 0 
to  1 5 years  when  employing  the  standard  or  group 
shelterwood. 

EFFECTS  TO  THE  TIMBER  RESOURCE 

Effects  to  the  timber  resource  are  discussed  in  this 
section  in  terms  of  changes  to  the  age-class  distri- 
bution, growth  and  yield,  insect  and  disease  infes- 
tation, potential  for  noxious  weed  invasion,  and  fire 
management. 

Timber  management  activities  directly  and  indi- 
rectly affect  the  timber  resources  of  the  analysis 
area  by  modifying  components  such  as  the 
species  abundance  and  distribution;  age-class 


IV -24 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  SV 


distribution  and  abundance  and  distribution  of 
condition  classes;  and  the  overall  health  of  the 
forest,  including  insect  and  disease  infestation 
and  the  potential  for  wildfires. 

All  action  alternatives  propose  use  of  the  shelter- 
wood  and  clearcut  silvicultural  systems  or  modifi- 
cations of  those  systems.  Prescribed  treatments 
are  the  same  for  Alternatives  2,  3,  and  4.  Initial 
effects  to  vegetation  would  be  similar  for  these 
alternatives.  Effects  to  vegetation  would  vary 
slightly  for  Alternatives  5 and  6 and  2A  due  to 
helicopter  logging  (alternative  5)  and  leaving  is- 
lands in  the  clearcuts  (Alternatives  6 and  2A). 
Please  refer  to  EFFECTS  BY  ALTERNATIVE  in  this 
chapter,  for  a detailed  description  of  the  effects  by 
alternative.  The  main  differences  when  consider- 
ing all  the  alternatives  is  the  relative  ability  to  im- 
prove growth,  health,  and  vigor  (size  and  location 
of  cutting  units,  and  the  acres  harvested). 

Road  construction  associated  with  timber  harvest- 
ing has  a small  direct  effect  on  the  vegetation  be- 


cause that  portion  of  land  committed  to  roads  can- 
not grow  vegetation  for  a long  period  of  time. 
Indirect  effects  on  the  timber  resource  from  road 
building  would  also  occur.  Roads  built  to  access 
these  timber  harvest  areas  could  be  used  again  to 
facilitate  later  entries.  Fire  protection,  stand  tend- 
ing, and  the  ability  to  monitor  and  control  insect 
and  disease  problems  would  be  enhanced 
through  road  access.  However,  road  construction 
would  increase  the  potential  for  invasion  of  nox- 
ious weeds. 

Table  IV-5  summarizes  the  acres  treated  (by  silvi- 
cultural system  and  community)  and  the  estimated 
production  in  million  board  feet  (mmbf)  for  each 
alternative.  The  road  and  cutting  unit  locations  and 
sizes  are  shown  on  Figures  11-2  through  Figure  11-7 
in  Chapter  II.  For  a detailed  description  of  the  silvi- 
cultural systems  to  be  employed,  the  reader  is 
referred  to  the  Features  Common  to  all  Action  Al- 
ternatives in  section  of  Chapter  II. 


TABLE  IV-5:  ACRES  HARVESTED,  ESTIMATED  TIMBER  HARVEST  AND  HARVEST  METHOD  BY  ALTERNATIVE 


Acres  Harvested 
Lodqepole  Pine 
Community1 

Alt  1 

0 

Alt  2 
410 

Ait  3 
27© 

Alt  4 
645 

Ait  5 
124 

Ait  6 
PRE- 
FERRED 

545 

ASt  2A 
344 

Douqlas-flr 

Community2 

© 

15® 

170 

202 

16® 

202 

15® 

Total  Acres  Harvest- 
ed 

© 

56® 

440 

S47 

292 

747 

502 

Percent  of  Analysis 
Area  Harvested 
Lodqepole  Pine 

Community1 

0 

4.7 

3.1 

7.4 

1.4 

6.3 

4.0 

Douqlas-flr 

Community2 

0 

3.® 

4.1 

4.® 

4.1 

4.® 

3.® 

Total  Percent  of  Anal- 
ysis Area  Harvested 

0 

3.7 

2.9 

5.5 

1.9 

4.® 

3.2 

Estimated  Timber 
Harvest  (MMBF)3 

0 

4.9 

3.75 

6.® 

1.7® 

6.1© 

4.2 

IV -25 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


TABLE  IV-5:  ACRES  HARVESTED,  ESTIMATED  TIMBER  HARVEST  AND  HARVEST  METHOD  BY  ALTERNATIVE 

(continued) 


Alt  1 

Alt  2 

Alt  3 

Alt  4 

Alt  5 

Alt  6 
PRE- 
FERRED 

Alt  2A 

Acres  Harvested 

Lodqepole  Pine 
Community1 

0 

410 

270 

645 

124 

545 

344 

Harvest  Method 

Clearcut  with 
Islands 

0 

0 

0 

© 

0 

427* 

402 

ClearcutfSng 

0 

410 

270 

645 

124 

186 

10 

Shelterwood 

0 

15® 

170 

202 

16S 

202 

158 

1 - LodgepoSe  pine  or  mixed  conifer  Bodgepole  pine,  subalpine  fir,  Engelmann  spruce  and  Douglas-fir 
on  subalpine  fir  habitat  types 

2 - Predominantly  Douglas-fir  with  minor  Inclusions  of  lodgepole  pine  and/or  subalpine  fir  on  sub- 
alpine fir  and  Douglas-fir  habitat  types 

3 - Million  board  feet 

* - Total  acreage  within  harvest  unit  boundary 


Age  Diversity 

The  desired  future  condition  of  areas  available  for 
the  application  of  timber  management  as  estab- 
lished by  the  Forest  Plan  shall  contain  the  follow- 
ing distribution  of  timber  stand  age  classes  in  the 
year  2030  (Forest  Plan,  1V-90)  (Table  IV-6).  This 
age  distribution  is  desirable  in  order  to  produce  a 
distribution  of  size  and  age  classes  that  are  more 
vigorous,  more  resistant  to  insect  and  disease  in- 
festation, and  more  productive  than  existing 
stands. 


TABLE  IV-6:  DESIRED  DISTRIBUTION  OF  AGE 
CLASSES  IN  YEAR  2030  (In  percent  of 
analysis  area) 


Age 

Class 

Years 

Percent 

1 

0-39  years 

31.1 

2 

40-79  years 

16.® 

3 

80-1 1 S years 

1.0 

4 

1 20-1 59  years 

15.9 

5 

160+  years 

35.2 

This  desired  distribution  is  major  in  relation  to  cur- 
rent age  classes  of  timber  stands  in  the  Moyer  Salt 
Analysis  Area.  Currently  less  than  5%  of  the  forest- 
ed areas  in  the  analysis  area  are  in  age  class  1 . 
The  remaining  95%  of  the  forested  areas  are  in  age 
classes  3, 4,  and  5.  This  skew  in  age  class  distribu- 
tion is  major  because  unless  some  of  the  stands 
that  are  currently  in  the  older  age  classes  are  con- 


IV -26 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


verted  to  younger  age  classes,  this  distribution  will 
not  be  met.  In  addition,  it  is  generally  considered 
unhealthy  for  large  areas  of  an  ecosystem  to  be 
occupied  by  one  particular  phase  of  development, 
as  is  the  case  for  most  of  the  analysis  area.  Such 
an  ecosystem  would  be  considered  unbalanced 
and  would  lose  flexibility  to  respond  to  environ- 
mental changes. 

In  order  to  bring  these  stands  into  a more  produc- 
tive status  and  to  improve  the  age  distribution  to- 
ward the  desired  future  condition,  silvicultural 
treatments  are  needed  that  would  convert  some  of 
the  older,  slow-growing,  overmature  stands  into 
younger,  more  vigorous  stands. 


Action  alternatives  that  would  convert  the  largest 
acreages  of  forested  stands  in  the  older  age  class- 
es to  younger,  immature  second  growth  stands 
through  regeneration  harvests  (a  harvest  that  re- 
moves trees  in  order  to  make  regeneration  possi- 
ble) and  subsequent  timber  stand  improvement 
activities  would  have  the  greatest  effect  on  in- 
creasing the  productivity  and  the  age  distribution 
of  the  forest.  The  index  used  to  measure  this  effect 
is  the  estimated  acreage  of  timber  harvested  in 
each  alternative,  and  is  displayed  in  Table  IV-7  by 
alternative. 


TABLE  8V-7:  AGE  DSSTRSBUTSON  FOLLOWING  HARVEST  (In  percent  of  analysis  area) 


Age 

Aft  1 

Alt  2 

Alt  3 

Alt  4 

Alt  5 

Alt  S 
PRE- 
FERRED 

AS!  2A 

1 (0-39  years) 

4.9 

9.3 

8.3 

11.5 

7.2 

10.7 

8.8 

2 (40-79  years) 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

3 (80-1 1 9 years) 

11.7 

11.7 

11.7 

11.7 

11.7 

11.7 

11.7 

4 (120-159  years) 

69.9 

66.1 

67.1 

64.0 

68.3 

64.9 

66.6 

5 (165+  years) 

13.5 

12.9 

12.8 

12.7 

12.8 

12.7 

12.9 

Insects  and  Disease 

Insects  and  disease  infestations  have  caused  re- 
duced stand  growth  and  increased  mortality  within 
the  analysis  area.  Silvicultural  treatments  pro- 
posed for  all  action  alternatives  reduce  present 
insect  and  disease  levels  and  improve  the  resis- 
tance of  trees  to  these  agents  in  the  regenerated 
stand  as  well  as  the  entire  area  in  general.  The 
relative  ability  of  the  individual  alternatives  to  treat 
insect  and  disease  conditions  varies  with  the  num- 
ber of  acres  cut,  as  described  in  the  following 
'Effects  by  Alternative’  section. 

Mixed  conifer  stands  still  show  the  effects  of  a 
major  mountain  pine  beetle  epidemic  during  the 
193Q’s.  The  level  of  dwarf  mistletoe  infestation  is 
heavy  throughout  these  stands.  If  left  untreated, 
reduced  stand  vigor  as  a result  of  total  stand  infec- 
tion by  mistletoe  would  increase  the  likelihood  of  a 
subsequent  insect  infestation.  Harvest  of  the 
mixed  conifer  stands  would  produce  a variety  of 
age  and  size  classes  in  the  lodgepole  pine  forest 
community  in  order  to  prevent  damage  due  to  in- 


sects, disease,  and  fire.  Post  harvest  timber  stand 
improvements  would  also  be  performed  in  all  re- 
generated stands  at  a relatively  young  age  in  order 
to  maintain  tree  and  stand  vigor  by  removing  in- 
fected trees.  Decreasing  the  competitive  interac- 
tion within  a stand  would  also  help  maintain  stand 
health  and  vigor,  as  well  as  reducing  the  time 
needed  to  meet  the  desired  future  condition  in 
terms  of  tree  size  and  stocking  levels. 

Douglas-fir  bark  beetle  and  western  spruce  bud- 
worm  infestations  have  been  heavy  due  to  pro- 
longed drought  and  subsequent  stress,  and  have 
caused  defoliation  throughout  the  Douglas-fir 
stands.  Silvicultural  methods  prescribed  for  the 
Douglas-fir  forest  would  lessen  the  effects  of  West- 
ern spruce  budworm  and  Douglas-fir  bark  beetle 
by  removing  infected  overstory  and  understory 
hosts  and  replacing  them  with  more  vigorous 
stands  containing  non-host  species  under  even- 
aged  management.  Some  regenerated  stands 
would  have  the  overstory  removed  before  the  re- 
generation reaches  three  feet  in  height.  As  in  the 
lodgepole  communities,  removal  of  infected  trees 
and  decreasing  the  competitive  interaction  within 


IV -27 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Saie  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


the  regenerated  stands  would  maintain  tree  and 
stand  health  and  vigor. 

Fire  Management  Considerations 

The  objective  of  fire  management  in  the  analysis 
area  is  the  prevention  .of  stand-destroying  fires 
within  the  lodgepole  community  and  substitution 
of  management  activities  that  replicate  the  natural 
role  of  fire.  This  is  accomplished  in  part  through 
the  proposed  timber  harvest  activities  and  associ- 
ated slash  disposal.  All  action  alternatives  propose 
timber  harvest  in  the  lodgepole  forest  community 
and  thus  will  create  age-class  mosaics  which  help 
reduce  the  potential  for  stand-destroying  fires. 

All  action  alternatives  utilize  silvicultural  systems 
designed  to  harvest  the  regenerated  stands  be- 
fore they  become  susceptible  to  infestation  and 
mortality  due  to  mountain  pine  beetle  or  other  in- 
sects or  diseases.  This  will  provide  an  opportunity 
to  substitute  human  management  of  the  forest  for 
fire.  In  addition,  the  harvesting  of  lodgepole  pine 
trees  for  house  logs,  firewood,  posts  and  poles, 
and  woodchips  will  provide  additional  opportuni- 
ties for  fuel  management  through  harvesting. 

Noxious  Weeds  and  Exotic  Plants 

For  all  action  alternatives,  the  potential  for  noxious 
weeds  or  exotic  species  to  become  established  in 
areas  where  logging  activities  have  exposed  bare 
mineral  soil  would  increase.  Ground  disturbance 
in  areas  such  as  road  cut  and  fill  slopes,  landings, 
skid  trails,  and  burned  slash  piles  may  create  con- 
ditions favorable  for  the  establishment  of  these 
weeds.  Knapweed  is  the  primary  species  of  con- 
cern in  this  area,  although  establishment  by  other 
weed  species  is  also  possible.  The  most  common 
way  that  knapweed  is  spread  is  on  machinery  from 
infested  areas  elsewhere  in  the  area,  when  the 
seed  is  carried  on  the  tires  and  undercarriage  of 
trucks,  cars,  logging  equipment,  and  so  on.  Other 
exotic  species  such  as  thistle  also  tend  to  enter 
areas  that  have  been  disturbed  and  may  affect  the 
divesity  of  plant  species  in  these  areas. 

The  Cobalt  District  has  an  ongoing  weed  control 
program  for  knapweed  and  other  weeds  that  uti- 
lizes an  annual  application  of  chemical  herbicide. 
The  control  program  has  proven  successful  in  re- 
ducing the  rate  of  spread  of  knapweed  and  in 
some  areas  reducing  the  actual  level  of  infestation. 
The  Forest  Plan  and  the  Noxious  Weed  Program 


Environmental  Assessment  provide  direction  for 
the  control  of  noxious  weeds. 

The  potential  for  weed  invasion  and  the  acreage  of 
weed  control  required  for  each  action  alternative 
would  be  directly  correlated  to  the  amount  of 
ground  disturbance  due  to  timber  harvesting  and 
road  construction. 


EFFECTS  BY  ALTERNATIVE 

Alternative  1 - No  Action 

In  this  alternative,  no  road  building  or  silvicultural 
treatments  would  occur.  No  timber  would  be  sup- 
plied to  local  mills  or  contributed  towards  the  Al- 
lowable Sale  Quantity  established  in  the  Forest 
Plan.  No  improvement  in  site  productivity  could  be 
achieved  through  conversion  of  trees  that  are  no 
longer  growing  to  younger,  productive  stands 
through  timber  harvest  and  regeneration  of  the 
site.  This  would  leave  timber  stands  in  the  area  well 
below  their  site  potential  and  at  high  risk  of  further 
losses  from  disease,  decay,  and  mortality.  No 
change  in  the  existing  condition  classes  or  age 
class  distribution  would  occur  under  Alternative  1 . 
There  would  continue  to  be  a disproportionate 
percentage  of  acres  in  the  older  age  classes  and 
condition  classes. 

In  the  lodgepole  community,  mature/overmature 
pole-sized  stands  can  persist  for  varying  lengths  of 
time  if  undisturbed.  Because  this  a serai  tree 
species,  these  stands  would  eventually  die  and 
the  stand  would  move  towards  climax.  In  north- 
eastern Washington  and  Northern  Idaho,  lodge- 
pole pine  stands  begin  to  die  at  80  to  1 00  years; 
at  higher  elevations  in  Montana,  they  may  live 
several  hundred  years  (Tackle  1961).  Trees  in  this 
area  can  therefore  be  expected  to  live  1 00  to  200 
years.  These  stands  are  overstocked  and  competi- 
tion between  trees  is  high.  Eventually  , overpopu- 
lation of  trees  per  acre  or  competition  induced 
mortality  (self-thinning)  would  begin  to  occur.  Al- 
though neither  density  nor  competition  directly  kill 
the  tree,  the  effects  of  severe  competition  makes 
the  individual  trees  susceptible  to  other  agents  of 
mortality.  For  example,  the  reduced  vigor  associat- 
ed with  overstocking  may  result  in  greater  suscep- 
tibility to  insect  attacks  (Keen,  1936;  Westveld 
1954;  Waring  and  Pitman,  1980).  As  the  lodgepole 
pine  trees  die,  these  stands  would  eventually  take 


IV -28 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


on  the  appearance  of  the  mixed  conifer  stand  con- 
dition of  the  lodgepole  pine  community. 

Within  the  mixed  conifer  stands,  deferment  of  tim- 
ber harvesting  would  allow  them  to  succeed  to- 
ward their  climax  state,  in  the  absence  of  major 
disturbance.  These  stands  are  currently  well  on 
their  way  toward  the  climax  forest  of  subalpine  fir. 
The  shade-intolerant  serai  lodgepole  will  eventual- 
ly be  replaced  by  the  more  shade-tolerant  sub- 
alpine fir.  Although  occasional  lodgepole  pine 
seedlings  will  continue  to  be  established  under  the 
forest  canopy  for  some  time,  they  will  rarely  grow 
to  maturity  (Lotan  and  Perry,  1983). 

Deferment  in  all  of  the  lodgepole  pine  forest  com- 
munities would  favor  the  subalpine  fir  component 
and  a multi-story  canopy.  This  would  result  in  high- 
er levels  of  activity  by  western  spruce  budworm 
and  other  insects  and  diseases,  and  cause  a long 
term  reduction  in  tree  growth  in  these  stands 
(Brookes  et  at,  1985). 

The  risk  of  potential  wildfire  would  be  greatest  in 
the  no  action  alternative  because  of  the  larger 
acreage  of  heavy  fuels  resulting  from  mortality  of 
trees  that  would  die  if  not  harvested,  and  because 
no  new  firebreaks  would  be  constructed  in  the 
form  of  roads  or  harvest  units.  A transportation 
system  would  not  be  developed  that  would  pro- 
vide access  for  personnel  and  equipment  in  the 
event  of  a wildfire. 

Loss  of  trees  to  mortality  and  not  converting 
stands  of  older,  nonproductive  trees  to  a more 
productive  status  conflicts  with  the  existing  man- 
agement direction  for  the  area  to  manage  for  a 
long  term  output  of  commercial  sawtimber. 

Alternative  2 

This  alternative  would  yield  4.9  mmbf  of  timber  to 
local  timber  mills.  St  would  convert  568  acres  of 
older,  unproductive  trees  to  younger,  more  vigor- 
ous conditions.  This  alternative  would  place  the 
third  greatest  number  of  acres  under  immediate 
management,  increasing  average  productivity  of 
the  area  (less  than  Alternatives  4 and  6 but  more 
than  Alternatives  3,  5 and  2A).  This  alternative 
would  shift  568  acres  from  age  classes  4 and  5 and 
to  age  class  1 and  would  increase  the  percent  of 
age  class  1 from  4.9  to  9.3  percent.  This  alternative 
utilizes  the  transportation  best  suited  for  fire  sup- 


pression efforts  in  the  lodgepole  community  in  the 
event  of  wildfire. 

To  meet  visual  quality  objectives  contained  in  the 
Forest  Plan,  many  of  the  clearcut  units  in  the  mixed 
conifer  stands  would  be  restricted  to  1 5 acres  or 
less  in  size.  The  regenerated  stands  of  lodgepole 
seedlings  would  initially  be  relatively  insect  and 
disease  free.  However,  due  to  the  high  perimeter- 
to-area  ratio  of  these  small  stands,  they  would  be 
highly  susceptible  to  dwarf  mistletoe  spores  falling 
from  older  infested  trees  and  onto  the  younger 
trees,  resulting  in  total  infection  of  the  regenerated 
stands.  The  small  units  would  also  diminish  the 
ability  to  locate  unit  boundaries  utilizing  topo- 
graphic features  and  changes  in  timber  type  which 
are  normally  employed  when  designing  harvest 
units  in  dwarf  mistletoe-infected  lodgepole  pine 
timber  types.  Reduced  stand  vigor  as  a result  of 
total  stand  infection  by  mistletoe  may  increase  the 
likelihood  of  a subsequent  insect  infestation. 
Where  unit  size  is  constrained  only  by  insect  and 
disease  standards  and  guidelines,  the  regenerat- 
ed stands  would  be  susceptible  to  dwarf  mistletoe 
infection  along  the  edges  where  adjacent  stands 
are  already  infected.  Unit  layout  employing  topo- 
graphic boundaries  and  changes  in  timber  type 
would  help  to  slow  reinvasion. 

Douglas-fir  stands  would  be  harvested  with  either 
a standard  or  group  shelterwood  system.  In  order 
to  meet  all  resource  objectives  contained  in  the 
Forest  Plan,  all  units  except  one  would  be  limited 
to  25  acres  or  less  in  size.  As  a result  of  limiting  unit 
size,  substantial  untreated  areas  would  remain  for 
a major  time  period.  These  untreated  areas  would 
continue  to  incur  mortality  from  Douglas-fir  beetle. 
Immature  understory  trees  would  continue  to  re- 
ceive varying  levels  of  damage  and  mortality  from 
Western  spruce  budworm.  It  is  conceivable  that 
future  management  alternatives  for  untreated 
stands  would  be  reduced  or  precluded  due  to  lack 
of  adequate  seed-producing  trees  and  healthy  un- 
derstory trees. 

Alternative  3 

This  alternative  would  yield  3.75  mmbf  of  timber  to 
local  timber  mills.  It  would  convert  440  acres  of 
older,  unproductive  trees  to  younger,  more  vigor- 
ous conditions.  This  alternative  would  place  the 
fifth  greatest  number  of  acres  under  immediate 
management,  increasing  average  productivity  of 
the  area  (less  than  Alternatives  2,  4,  6 and  2A  but 


IV -29 


RZSoyer  SaK  Timber  Sale  FfimaS  EDS 


Chapter  IV 


more  than  Alternatives  1 and  5).  This  alternative 
would  shift  440  acres  from  age  classes  4 and  5 and 
to  age  class  1 and  would  increase  the  percent  of 
age  class  1 from  4.9  to  8.3  percent. 

Alternative  3 leaves  a large  portion  of  the  lodge- 
pole  pine  forest  community  unroaded  and  unhar- 
vested, thereby  increasing  the  potential  for  fire. 
Under  this  alternative  there  would  also  be  less 
vehicular  access  for  fire  suppression  efforts. 

This  alternative  is  similar  to  Alternative  2 in  that  to 
meet  visual  quality  objectives  contained  in  the  For- 
est Plan,  many  of  the  clearcut  units  in  the  mixed 
conifer  and  shelterwood  units  in  the  Douglas-fir 
stands  would  be  restricted  to  1 5 and  25  acres  in 
size,  respectively.  This  alternative  is  similar  to  Al- 
ternative 2 in  its  ability  to  improve  growing  condi- 
tions at  the  stand  level. 

This  alternative  proposes  harvest  of  two  Douglas- 
fir  sheiterwood  units  (1 2 acres)  and  two  ciearcuts 
(30  acres)  not  included  in  Alternative  2.  The  shel- 
terwood stands  have  no  understory  and  are  locat- 
ed on  relatively  dry  sites  characterized  by  steep 
terrain.  Leave  trees  would  be  left  to  provide  seed 
and  shade  to  the  regenerated  stand.  However, 
slopes  in  this  area  are  steep  enough  to  prevent 
machine  site  preparation;  as  a result,  full  stocking 
of  regeneration  could  take  as  much  as  20  years. 

Alternative  4 

This  alternative  would  yield  the  highest  amount  of 
timber,  6.9  mmbf,  to  local  timber  mills.  It  would 
convert  847  acres  of  older,  unproductive  trees  to 
younger,  more  vigorous  conditions.  This  alterna- 
tive would  place  the  highest  number  of  acres  un- 
der immediate  management,  increasing  average 
productivity  of  the  area  more  than  any  of  the  other 
action  alternatives.  This  alternative  would  shift  847 
acres  from  age  classes  4 and  5 and  to  age  class 
1 and  would  increase  the  percent  of  age  class  1 
from  4.9  to  1 1.5  percent. 

The  transportation  system  developed  for  this  alter- 
native is  best  suited  for  fire  suppression  efforts  in 
the  lodgepole  community  in  the  event  of  wildfire. 

In  the  lodgepole  pine  community,  unit  size  would 
be  determined  only  by  Forest  Plan  insect  and  dis- 
ease standards  and  guidelines.  Therefore,  maxi- 
mum efficiency  of  improving  growth,  health,  and 
vigor  of  the  treated  stands  would  be  achieved. 


Where  dwarf  mistletoe  levels  are  extremely  high 
unit  size  may  reach  60  acres.  The  regenerated 
stands  would  still  be  susceptible  to  dwarf  mistletoe 
infection  along  the  edges  where  adjacent  stands 
are  already  infected,  but  the  use  of  larger  units 
would  provide  for  boundary  placement  techniques 
employing  topographic  features  and  changes  in 
timber  type  that  are  designed  to  help  slow  reinva- 
sion. 

In  Douglas-fir  stands  harvest  units  would  be  de- 
signed to  maximize  harvest  of  trees  that  will  die  in 
the  near  future,  release  understory  trees  present 
on  the  site,  and  control  Douglas-fir  bark  beetle  and 
Western  spruce  budworm  infestation.  In  stands 
that  are  currently  considered  openings  for  big 
game  (they,  provide  forage  rather  than  cover)  or 
where  existing  natural  regeneration  would  provide 
desired  stocking  levels  and  hiding  cover  after  har- 
vest, unit  size  may  exceed  40  acres.  Untreated 
cover  patches  between  units  would  adhere  to  For- 
est Plan  Wildlife  Standards  and  Guidelines  (Forest 
Plan,  IV-121).  Douglas-fir  stands  would  be  logged 
by  tractor.  The  majority  of  the  stands  are  under  40 
percent  in  slope  and  are  therefore  conducive  to 
machine  site  preparation. 

Alternative  5 

This  alternative  would  yield  1 .79  mmbf  of  timber  to 
local  timber  mills.  It  would  convert  292  acres  of 
older,  unproductive  trees  to  younger,  more  vigor- 
ous conditions.  This  alternative  would  place  the 
sixth  greatest  number  of  acres  under  immediate 
management.  This  alternative  would  shift  292 
acres  from  age  classes  4 and  5 and  to  age  class 
1 and  would  increase  the  percent  of  age  class  1 
from  4.9  to  7.2  percent. 

This  alternative  proposes  harvest  of  three 
Douglas-fir  shelterwood  units  (S6,  S1 1,  30)  and 
four  ciearcuts  (1 W-4W)  also  included  in  Alternative 
4. 

Where  clearcutting  is  prescribed,  this  alternative  is 
the  same  as  alternative  4 in  its  ability  to  improve 
growing  conditions  at  the  stand  level.  At  the 
project  level,  Alternative  5 leaves  the  entire  lodge- 
pole pine  forest  community  (located  wi;thin  the 
roadless  area)  unroaded  and  unharvested.  The 
effects  of  deferring  treatment  in  such  a sizable 
portion  of  the  lodgepole  community  would  be  the 
same  as  described  in  Alternative  1 - No  Action. 


IV -30 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


The  risk  of  potential  wildfire  would,  for  this  portion 
of  the  lodgepole  community,  be  as  great  as  the  no 
action  alternative  because  of  the  large  acreage  of 
heavy  fuels  resulting  from  mortality  of  trees  that 
would  die  if  not  harvested,  and  because  no  new 
fire  breaks  would  be  constructed  in  the  form  of 
roads  or  harvest  units.  A transportation  system 
would  not  be  developed  that  would  provide  ac- 
cess for  personnel  and  equipment  in  the  event  of 
a wildfire. 

Douglas-fir  stands  would  be  harvested  with  an  ir- 
regular shelterwood  system.  As  in  Alternative  4, 
Douglas-fir  stands  harvest  units  would  be  de- 
signed to  maximize  harvest  of  trees  that  will  die  in 
the  near  future,  release  understory  trees  present 
on  the  site,  and  control  Douglas-fir  bark  beetle. 

The  irregular  shelterwood  method  is  not  as  effec- 
tive in  controlling  western  spruce  budwornm  as  the 
group  shelterwood  employed  in  Alternatives  2,  3, 
and  4.  The  delay  in  performing  the  removal  cut  in 
order  to  allow  increased  height  growth  of  the  re- 
generation will  maintain  the  current  multistory  situ- 
ation which  encourages  western  spruce  bud- 
worm. 

In  stands  that  are  currently  considered  openings 
for  big  game  (they  provide  forage  rather  than  cov- 
er) or  where  existing  natural  regeneration  would 
provide  desired  stocking  levels  and  hiding  cover 
after  harvest,  unit  size  may  exceed  40  acres.  Un- 
treated cover  patches  between  units  would  ad- 
here to  Forest  Plan  Wildlife  Standards  and  Guide- 
lines (Forest  Plan,  IV-121).  Unlike  the  other 
alternatives  all  Douglas-fir  stands  would  be  logged 
by  helicopter.  Machine  scarification  and  slash  pil- 
ing would  be  infeasible  due  to  Sack  of  road  access, 
therefore,  pinegrass  will  be  expected  to  increase 
following  harvest  eventually  forming  a dense  sod. 
The  establishment  of  this  sod  could  delay  regener- 
ation for  20  years  or  longer.  The  effects  of  delayed 
regeneration  would  be  to  delay  the  removal  cut  of 
the  shelterwood  for  up  to  35  years  or  longer.  Al- 
though it  is  difficult  to  predict,  it  is  highly  likely  that 
continued  defoliation  by  western  spruce  budworm 
would  result  in  loss  of  incremental  growth  and 
some  mortality  in  the  existing  advance  regenera- 
tion. 

Douglas-fir  beetle  attacks  to  the  overstory  trees 
would  continue  to  cause  mortality  to  shelterwood 
trees  left  for  seed  and  shade.  Depending  on  the 
severity  of  damage  by  western  spruce  budworm 
and  Douglas-fir  beetle,  planting  may  be  necessary 


to  achieve  full  stocking  of  the  site.  At  current  costs, 
planting  may  be  infeasible  due  to  the  prohibitive 
access  to  these  units. 

The  delay  in  establishing  regeneration  not  only 
would  delay  the  removal  cut  of  the  shelterwood  but 
would  also  delay  the  treatment  of  adjacent 
Douglas-fir  stands.  Silvicultural  alternatives  for 
treating  these  stands  may  be  reduced  to  clearcut- 
ting  and  planting  due  to  the  absence  of  accept- 
able trees  to  leave  for  seed  and  shelter. 

The  risk  of  potential  wildfire  (of  greatest  concern  in 
the  lodgepole  community)  would  increase  as  the 
logging  and  thinning  slash  would  be  left  untreated 
due  to  lack  of  piling  and  scarification. 

Alternative  © PREFERRED 

This  alternative  would  yield  the  second  highest 
amount  of  timber,  6.10  mmbf,  to  local  timber  mills. 
It  would  convert  747  acres  of  older,  unproductive 
trees  to  younger,  more  vigorous  conditions.  This 
alternative  would  place  the  second  highest  num- 
ber of  acres  under  immediate  management,  in- 
creasing average  productivity  of  the  area  more 
than  the  alternatives  1 ,2,3,5,  and  2A  but  less  than 
alternative  4.  This  alternative  would  shift  747  acres 
from  age  classes  4 and  5 and  to  age  class  1 and 
would  increase  the  percent  of  age  class  1 from  4.9 
to  10.7  percent. 

The  transportation  system  developed  for  this  alter- 
native is  best  suited  for  fire  suppression  efforts  in 
the  lodgepole  community  in  the  event  of  wildfire. 

In  Douglas-fir  stands  harvest  units  would  be  de- 
signed to  maximize  harvest  of  trees  that  will  die  in 
the  near  future,  release  understory  trees  present 
on  the  site,  and  control  Douglas-fir  bark  beetle. 

The  irregular  shelterwood  method  is  not  as  effec- 
tive in  controlling  western  spruce  budworm  as  the 
group  shelterwood  employed  in  Alternatives  2,  3, 
and  4.  The  delay  in  performing  the  removal  cut  in 
order  to  allow  increased  height  growth  of  the  re- 
generation will  maintain  the  current  multistory  situ- 
ation which  encourages  western  spruce  bud- 
worm. 

In  stands  that  are  currently  considered  openings 
for  big  game  (they  provide  forage  rather  than  cov- 
er) or  where  existing  natural  regeneration  would 
provide  desired  stocking  levels  and  hiding  cover 


IV -31 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


after  harvest,  unit  size  may  exceed  40  acres.  Un- 
treated cover  patches  between  units  would  ad- 
here to  Forest  Plan  Wildlife  Standards  and  Guide- 
lines (Forest  Plan,  IV-121).  Douglas-fir  stands 
would  be  logged  by  tractor.  The  majority  of  the 
stands  are  spell  40  percent  in  slope  and  are  there- 
fore conducive  to  machine  site  preparation. 

In  the  lodgepole  community,  where  slopes  permit, 
approximately  1 5%  of  the  area  within  the  clearcuts 
would  be  left  in  uncut  islands  approximately  1 acre 
in  size.  Preferred  areas  to  be  maintained  as  islands 
would  be  those  containing  Douglas-fir  and/or  En- 
gelmann  spruce,  areas  with  lower  fuel  loadings 
and/or  areas  with  high  quality  advanced  regenera- 
tion. The  islands  would  still  contain  varying  per- 
centages of  dwarf  mistletoe  infected  lodgepole 
pine  ( both  in  the  understory  and  overstory).  The 
greatest  spread  of  dwarf  mistletoe  is  from  oversto- 
ry trees  to  understory  trees,  thus  units  containing 
uncut  islands  have  a greater  potential  for  more 
rapid  infection  than  standard  clearcuts.  It  would  be 
important  to  fell  or  remove  infected  lodgepole  pine 
overstory  trees  located  on  the  edges  of  the  islands 
soon  after  logging. 

To  meet  visual  quality  objectives  contained  in  the 
Forest  Plan,  many  of  the  clearcut  units  in  the  mixed 
conifer  stands  would  be  restricted  to  1 5 acres  or 
less  in  size.  The  regenerated  stands  of  lodgepole 
seedlings  would  initially  be  relatively  insect  and 
disease  free.  However,  due  to  the  high  perimeter- 
to-area  ratio  of  these  small  stands,  they  would  be 
highly  susceptible  to  dwarf  mistletoe  spores  falling 
from  older  infested  trees  and  onto  the  younger 
trees,  resulting  in  total  infection  of  the  regenerated 
stands.  The  small  units  would  also  diminish  the 
ability  to  locate  unit  boundaries  utilizing  topo- 
graphic features  and  changes  in  timber  type  which 
are  normally  employed  when  designing  harvest 
units  in  dwarf  mistletoe-infected  lodgepole  pine 
timber  types.  Reduced  stand  vigor  as  a result  of 
total  stand  infection  by  mistletoe  may  increase  the 
likelihood  of  a subsequent  insect  infestation. 
Where  unit  size  is  constrained  only  by  insect  and 
disease  standards  and  guidelines,  the  regenerat- 
ed stands  would  be  susceptible  to  dwarf  mistletoe 
infection  along  the  edges  where  adjacent  stands 
are  already  infected.  Unit  layout  employing  topo- 
graphic boundaries  and  changes  in  timber  type 
would  help  to  slow  reinvasion. 

Overall  the  retention  of  islands  should  be  benefi- 
cial. Regenerated  stands  should  more  closely  ap- 


proximate the  species  mix  currently  occupying  the 
site.  Although  lodgepole  would  be  the  predomi- 
nant species,  greater  amounts  of  Douglas-fir,  En- 
gelmann  spruce  and  subalpine  would  be  expect- 
ed. Retention  of  the  islands  would  be  the  best  way 
to  ensure  protection  of  snags  and  retention  trees 
that  may  otherwise  be  pushed  over  or  damaged 
during  the  skidding  and  piling  process.  The  is- 
lands will  maintain  microsites  that  are  representa- 
tive of  existing  stand  conditions. 

Alternative  2A 

This  alternative  would  yield  the  fourth  highest 
amount  of  timber,  4.20  mmbf,  to  local  timber  mills. 
It  would  convert  502  acres  of  older,  unproductive 
trees  to  younger,  more  vigorous  conditions.  This 
alternative  would  place  the  fourth  highest  number 
of  acres  under  immediate  management,  increas- 
ing average  productivity  of  the  area  more  than  the 
alternatives  1 , 3 and  5 but  less  than  alternatives  2, 
4,  and  6.  This  alternative  would  shift  502  acres 
from  age  classes  4 and  5 and  to  age  class  1 and 
would  increase  the  percent  of  age  class  1 from  4.9 
to  8.8  percent. 

The  transportation  system  developed  for  this  alter- 
native is  best  suited  for  fire  suppression  efforts  in 
the  lodgepole  community  in  the  event  of  wildfire. 

Douglas-fir  stands  would  be  harvested  with  an  ir- 
regular shelterwood  system. 

The  irregular  shelterwood  method  is  not  as  effec- 
tive in  controlling  western  spruce  budworm  as  the 
group  shelterwood  employed  in  Alternatives  2,  3, 
and  4.  The  delay  in  performing  the  removal  cut  in 
order  to  allow  increased  height  growth  of  the  re- 
generation will  maintain  the  current  multistory  situ- 
ation which  encourages  western  spruce  bud- 
worm. 

In  order  to  meet  visual  quality  objectives  contained 
in  the  Forest  Plan,  all  units  except  one  would  be 
limited  to  25  acres  or  less  in  size.  As  a result  of 
limiting  unit  size,  substantial  untreated  areas 
would  remain  for  a major  time  period.  These  un- 
treated areas  would  continue  to  incur  mortality 
from  Douglas-fir  beetle.  Immature  understory  trees 
would  continue  to  receive  varying  levels  of  dam- 
age and  mortality  from  Western  spruce  budworm. 
It  is  conceivable  that  future  management  alterna- 
tives for  untreated  stands  would  be  reduced  or 


IV -32 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


precluded  due  to  lack  of  adequate  seed- 
producing  trees  and  healthy  understory  trees. 

In  the  lodgepole  community  approximately  1 0%  to 
30%  of  the  area  within  the  clearcuts  would  be  left 
in  uncut  islands  ranging  from  1/2  to  1 acre  in  size. 
Unlike  Alternative  6 the  island  concept  would  be 
attempted  in  steep  units  with  heavy  fuel  loadings. 
Even  with  protective  measures  such  as  designat- 
ed skid  trails  and  hand  firelines,  some  portion  (up 
to  all)  of  these  islands  may  be  destroyed  during 
logging  and  slash  disposal.  Preferred  areas  to  be 
maintained  as  islands  would  be  those  containing 
Douglas-fir  and/or  Engelmann  spruce,  areas  with 
lower  fuel  loadings  and/or  areas  with  high  quality 
advanced  regeneration.  The  islands  would  still 
contain  varying  percentages  of  dwarf  mistletoe  in- 
fected lodgepole  pine  ( both  in  the  understory  and 
overstory).  The  greatest  spread  of  dwarf  mistletoe 
is  from  overstory  trees  to  understory  trees,  thus 
units  containing  uncut  islands  have  a greater  po- 
tential for  more  rapid  infection  than  standard 
clearcuts.  It  would  be  important  to  fell  or  remove 
infected  lodgepole  pine  overstory  trees  located  on 
the  edges  of  the  islands  soon  after  logging. 

To  meet  visual  quality  objectives  contained  in  the 
Forest  Plan,  1 7 of  the  25  clearcut  units  in  the  mixed 
conifer  stands  would  be  restricted  to  1 5 acres  or 
less  in  size  (21  of  the  25  clearcut  units  would  have 
less  than  20  acres  treated).  The  regenerated 
stands  of  lodgepole  seedlings  would  initially  be 
relatively  insect  and  disease  free.  However,  due  to 
the  high  perimeter-to-area  ratio  of  these  small 
stands,  they  would  be  highly  susceptible  to  dwarf 
mistletoe  spores  falling  from  older  infested  trees 
and  onto  the  younger  trees,  resulting  in  total  infec- 
tion of  the  regenerated  stands.  The  small  units 
would  also  diminish  the  ability  to  locate  unit 
boundaries  utilizing  topographic  features  and 
changes  in  timber  type  which  are  normally  em- 
ployed when  designing  harvest  units  in  dwarf 
mistletoe-infected  lodgepole  pine  timber  types. 
Reduced  stand  vigor  as  a result  of  total  stand  in- 
fection by  mistletoe  may  increase  the  likelihood  of 
a subsequent  insect  infestation.  Where  unit  size  is 
constrained  only  by  insect  and  disease  standards 
and  guidelines,  the  regenerated  stands  would  be 
susceptible  to  dwarf  mistletoe  infection  along  the 
edges  where  adjacent  stands  are  already  infected. 
Unit  layout  employing  topographic  boundaries 
and  changes  in  timber  type  would  help  to  slow 
reinvasion. 


CUMULATIVE  EFFECTS 

Cumulative  effects  on  the  timber  resource  would 
result  from  the  past,  proposed,  future  or  lack  of 
timber  management  in  the  analysis  area. 

At  the  project  level  Alternatives  1 and  5 leave  the 
entire  lodgepole  pine  forest  community  (located 
within  the  roadless  area)  in  an  unmanaged  condi- 
tion. The  low  vigor  associated  with  these  overma- 
ture stands  will  continue  to  decline  making  the 
individual  tress  increasingly  susceptible  to  agents 
of  mortality.  The  risk  of  fire  occurring  and  the 
severity  of  potential  fires  will  continue  to  increase 
as  these  trees  die. 

Where  harvest  units  are  designed  to  meet  visual 
quality  objectives  (Alternatives  2,3, 5, 6 and  2A),  re- 
moval of  adjacent  stands  (leave  strips)  will  not  oc- 
cur until  first  entry  regenerated  stands  reach  an 
average  height  of  22-25  feet.  As  a result  of  limiting 
unit  size  and  delaying  the  second  entry,  substan- 
tial untreated  areas  will  remain  for  a major  time 
period.  In  lodgepole  pine  stands  where  dwarf 
mistletoe  levels  are  high,  the  combination  of  small 
first  entry  units  and  delaying  the  removal  of  infect- 
ed leave  strips  until  first  entry  units  are  regenerat- 
ed to  a height  of  22-25  feet,  could  result  in  total 
infection  of  the  regenerated  stand.  Findings  by 
Knutson  and  Tinnin,  1981  indicated  that  growth 
measurements  of  trees  heavily  infected  by  dwarf 
mistletoe  are  up  to  25%  lower  than  comparable 
uninfected  trees. 

In  Douglas-fir  stands  where  the  irregular  shelter- 
wood  is  employed,  the  desired  condition  of  four 
age  classes  and  canopy  levels  would  tend  to 
cause  continual  damage  by  western  spruce  bud- 
worm.  The  amount  and  intensity  of  this  damage 
can  directly  affect  the  growth  and  regeneration  of 
Douglas-fir.  The  effects  on  regeneration  begins 
with  the  damage  to  the  cones  and  defoliation  and 
top-killing  of  the  cone-producing  portion  of  the  tree 
(Fellin,  Schmidt,  and  Carlson,  1984). 

In  the  Douglas-fir  community,  untreated  areas 
would  continue  to  incur  mortality  from  Douglas-fir 
beetle.  Immature  understory  trees  would  continue 
to  receive  varying  levels  of  damage  and  mortality 
from  Western  spruce  budworm.  It  is  conceivable 
that  future  management  alternatives  for  untreated 
stands  would  be  reduced  or  precluded  due  to  lack 
of  adequate  seed-producing  trees  and  healthy  un- 
derstory trees. 


IV -33 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Flmai  ESS 


Chapter  IV 


Although  no  timber  harvest  of  the  size  of  the  pro- 
posed sale  is  planned  within  the  analysis  area, 
harvest  of  up  to  1 00  acres  of  primarily  post  and 
pole  material  through  small  sales  is  a reasonably 
foreseeable  future  action.  The  cumulative  effect  of 
these  activities  would  be  to  convert  overstocked, 
unproductive  stands  to  a more  productive  status 
and  to  improve  the  health  of  the  forest  through 
management  activities  designed  to  reduce  the  ef- 
fects of  insects  and  diseases. 

An  undetermined  amount  of  acres  within  the  anal- 
ysis area  may  also  be  assessed  for  dead  materia! 
(firewood  and  house  logs).  The  use  of  lodgepole 
pine  for  house  logs,  firewood,  posts  and  poles, 
and  woodchips  would  provide  opportunities  for 
fuel  management  related  harvesting.  Any  entry  for 
post  and  pole  material,  firewood,  house  logs,  or 
timber  stand  improvements  that  would  require 
road  building  or  the  use  of  heavy  equipment  would 
have  a separate  environmental  analysis. 

As  managed  stands  become  established,  im- 
proved productivity  and  reduced  losses  to  dis- 
ease, decay,  and  mortality  would  help  make  a sus- 
tained amount  of  timber  available  to  industry. 
Timber  harvested  in  this  entry  would,  of  course, 
reduce  the  amount  available  in  the  near  future  until 
such  stands  again  reach  commercial  size. 


CONSISTENCY  WITH  FOREST  PLAN 
STANDARDS  AND  GUIDELINES 

All  action  alternatives  are  consistent  with  Forest 
plan  standards  and  guidelines. 


EFFECTS  TO  WILDLIFE  RESOURCES 


In  accordance  with  Forest  Plan  direction  and  in- 
tent, three  species  from  the  Salmon  National 
Forest’s  list  of  management  indicator  species 
(MIS)  known  or  thought  to  occur  in  this  analysis 
area  were  selected  for  effects  assessments:  elk, 
pine  marten  and  goshawk.  These  species  were 
chosen  for  discussion  because  they  have  the  most 
specific  habitat  requirements  and  are  the  most 
likely  to  be  affected  by  proposed  activities.  They 
are  therefore  representative  of  other  MIS  species 
that  occur  in  the  area  that  have  similar  or  less 


specific  habitat  requirements.  The  following  text 
also  describes  potential  effects  to  other  MIS  and  to 
non-MIS  species  that  occur  in  the  analysis  area 
and  summarizes  the  discussion  of  MIS  species  in 
the  Biological  Evaluation  (the  reader  is  referred  to 
Appendix  G for  a more  detailed  discussion  of  ef- 
fects to  MIS  species).  Listed  and  proposed  threat- 
ened and  endangered  species  and  sensitive 
species  are  discussed  in  a separate  section. 

Elk  are  extremely  popular  animals  that  provide  ma- 
jor recreational  benefits  and  economic  importance 
to  the  Salmon  area.  Spring,  summer  and  fall  elk 
habitat  is  provided  within  this  analysis  area,  as  are 
excellent  calving/nursery  areas.  Pine  marten  are 
associated  yearlong  with  old-growth  spruce/ 
subalpine  fir  habitats,  and  goshawk  are  depend- 
ent upon  old-growth  stands  of  a variety  of  tree 
species. 

Several  species  which  may  be  of  general  interest 
to  the  public  but  are  not  under  specific  Federal  or 
State  management  direction  for  threatened,  en- 
dangered, or  sensitive  species  were  discussed  in 
Chapter  HI.  They  include:  black  bear,  cougar,  bob- 
cat, coyotes,  beaver,  blue,  ruffed,  and  Franklin’s 
grouse,  pileated  woodpecker,  brown  creeper,  and 
various  songbirds.  All  proposed  alternatives  will 
maintain  habitat  for  populations  of  each  of  these 
species. 

Appendix  D contains  a species  list  of  all  mammals 
(residents  and  migrants),  amphibians,  reptiles, 
birds  (residents,  summer  residents,  migrants,  and 
winter  visitors),  and  fish  (anadromous  and  resi- 
dent) that  are  known  to  occur  in  the  analysis  area 
or  whose  habitat  exists  in  the  analysis  area.  Many 
of  these  species  whose  habitat  exists  in  the  area 
have  not  been  observed  there. 

For  wildlife  assessment  purposes,  the  total  analy- 
sis area  has  been  divided  into  two  areas,  based 
upon  wildlife  habitat  similarities  (Chapter  III  and 
Figure  111-2).  Area  I is  at  lower  elevations  and  con- 
sists primarily  of  Douglas-fir  stands  with  minor 
mixed  conifer  timber  stands  in  the  Douglas-fir/ 
pinegrass  and  subalpine  fir/grouse  whortleberry 
habitat  types.  Area  11  occurs  at  upper  elevations 
and  is  dominated  by  fairly  uniform  stands  of  lodge- 
pole  pine  or  mixed  lodgepole  pine  and  subapline 
fir  with  minor  amounts  of  Englemann  spruce  within 
the  subalpine  fir/grouse  whortleberry  series  of 
habitat  types. 


IV -34 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


EFFECTS  COMMON  TO  ALL  ACTION 
ALTERNATIVES 

Timber  harvest  and  associated  road  construction 
have  the  potential  to  affect  wildlife  resources 
through  direct  habitat  alteration,  short-term  dis- 
turbance during  the  life  of  the  project,  and  post- 
sale or  long-term  disturbance  due  to  increased 
access  (Lyon  and  Ward,  1982). 

All  action  alternatives  in  this  proposal  will  harvest 
timber  (i.e.  remove  a portion  of  available  big  game 
cover)  in  both  Wildlife  Analysis  Areas.  In  Area  I, 
cover  removal  will  slightly  decrease  elk  habitat  po- 
tential or,  simply  stated,  the  ability  of  the  area  to 
■grow"  or  'produce'  elk.  In  Area  II,  however,  cover 
removal  will  slightly  increase  elk  habitat  potential. 
The  net  effect  of  these  changes  on  the  elk  habitat 
potential  of  the  entire  analysis  area  will  not  be 
significant.  However,  important  changes  in  habitat 
security  and  vulnerability  of  harvested  species,  es- 
pecially elk,  will  result  from  all  action  alternatives. 

Elk  habitat  security  is  generally  defined  as  continu- 
ous blocks  of  unbroken  cover  at  least  250  acres  in 
size,  covering  at  least  30%  of  the  area  and  located 
at  least  one-half  mile  from  an  open  road.  Area  1 
currently  has  a moderate  to  high  amount  of  secu- 
rity cover.  But,  due  to  the  relatively  small  blocks  of 
cover  (natural)  that  occur  in  this  area  and  the 
placement  of  proposed  harvest  units,  security  cov- 
er will  be  reduced  to  only  one  area  on  the  north 
slope  of  Salt  Creek  for  all  the  action  alternatives 
except  Alternatives  3 and  5.  Security  cover  will  be 
reduced  in  this  area  by  these  two  alternatives  also, 
but  not  as  greatly.  Area  II  is  currently  very  high  in 
security  cover  and  will  remain  acceptably  high  un- 
der all  alternatives.  Assumptions  for  both  these 
areas  include  closing  all  new  roads  to  all  but  ad- 
ministrative use. 

Big  game  (i.e.  elk)  vulnerability  is  determined  by 
such  parameters  as  the  length  and  timing  of  hunt- 
ing seasons,  season  structure  (i.e.  with  sex,  bull 
only,  branch  antlered  bull  only,  etc.),  type  of  sea- 
son (i.e.  rifle,  archery,  etc.),  weather  and  available 
habitat.  When  habitat  factors  such  as  human  ac- 
cess, cover:forage  ratio  and  security  cover  are  al- 
tered, vulnerability  changes.  Consequently,  to 
maintain  status  quo  in  a big  game  herd  in  the  face 
of  habitat  changes,  it  becomes  necessary  to  alter 
one  or  more  of  the  other  factors  that  affect  vulnera- 
bility. All  action  alternatives  will  change,  to  varying 


degrees,  available  habitat  in  both  Wildlife  Analysis 
Areas.  Predicted  effects  on  vulnerability,  ranked  by 
alternative  from  least  to  most  would  be: 
Alternatives  1 , 5,  3,  2A,  2,  6,  4. 

New  and/or  better  human  access  increases  the 
vulnerability  of  hunted  and  trapped  species  and 
may  even  cause  shifts  in  traditional  use  patterns. 
This  is  particularly  true  when  dealing  with  big 
game  habitat  parameters  such  as  calving/fawning 
areas,  key  winter  or  summer  ranges  and  security 
areas  due  to  the  specific  criteria  that  determine 
suitability  and  use  (Thomas  et  al.,  1979).  Many 
studies  have  shown  the  importance  of  timber/ 
nontimber  ecotones,  particularly  those  poorly  de- 
fined or  gradient  ecotones  between  sagebrush 
and  open  timber,  for  elk  calving  and  nursery  areas. 
Pregnant  cow  elk  normally  enter  this  type  of  habi- 
tat, if  available,  shortly  before  giving  birth.  After 
birth,  calves  usually  spend  one  to  three  weeks 
hiding  in  sagebrush  with  a 20  to  40  percent  crown 
cover  growing  along  such  ecotones.  Nearby  tim- 
bered portions  within  about  200  feet  of  the  eco- 
tones receive  heavy  use  during  this  period  by  both 
cows  and  calves.  Cow/calf  bands  are  also  com- 
monly observed  in  the  ecotonal  habitats  during  the 
early  summer  period. 

Analyses  of  the  current  and  predicted  elk  habitat 
potential  (EHP)  values  were  based  primarily  upon 
cover:forage  ratios  and  road  densities  (Thomas  et 
al.,  1979).  Predicted  effects  on  elk  calving  and 
nursery  habitats  were  based  upon  the  Central  Ida- 
ho Elk  Guidelines  (Ralphs  et  al.,  1979).  Predicted 
decreases  in  available  acres  of  old-growth  spruce- 
fir  and  Douglas-fir  were  used  to  evaluate  effects 
upon  pine  marten  and  goshawk,  respectively. 
Post-sale  access  was  also  used  for  these  two 
species.  Project  level  stand  exam  data  were  not 
available  for  all  stands  in  this  total  analysis  area. 
Therefore  photo-interpretation  was  also  used  to 
inventory  both  elk  cover  and  old  growth  stands. 


EFFECTS  BY  ALTERNATIVE 

Table  IV-8  summarizes  the  predicted  wildlife  ef- 
fects of  each  alternative  in  terms  of  road  densities, 
cover:forage  ratio,  EHP,  big  game  habitat  security, 
and  available  acres  of  old-growth  habitat.  These 
effects  are  discussed,  by  alternative,  in  the  follow- 
ing section. 


IV -35 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EiS 


Chapter  IV 


Alternative  1 - No  Action 

Alternative  1 would  have  no  immediate  or  short- 
term effects  on  big  game  covenforage  ratios,  habi- 
tat security,  key  components  or  vulnerabilty  and 
would  not  affect  acres  of  available  old-growth  habi- 
tat. Area  1 is  slightly  cover-limiting;  thus,  the 
present  covenforage  ratio  of  32:68  and  EHP  of  67 
percent  would  not  change.  The  current  open  road 
density  is  0.14  miles  per  square  mile  and  would 
remain  unchanged.  Big  game  habitat  security  val- 
ues would  remain  high  in  the  absence  of  additional 
road  construction  and  cover  removal.  Old-growth 
Douglas-fir  would  remain  present  in  natural  abun- 
dance. Pine  marten  habitat  would  remain  un- 
changed, though  not  of  high  quality  due  to  the 
paucity  of  spruce/fir  stands.  The  abundant,  natural 
timbered/nontimbered  ecotones  between 
Douglas-fir  and  sagebrush/grass  habitat  types 
would  remain  intact.  Consequently,  the  excellent 
goshawk  habitat  would  not  be  altered. 

In  Area  SI,  the  current  open  road  density  of  0.56 
miles  per  square  mile  and  the  EHP  of  87  percent 
would  remain  unchanged,  as  would  the  80:20  cov- 
er forage  ratio.  Big  game  habitat  security  would 
remain  very  high  and  vulnerability  would  remain 
low  in  the  absence  of  additional  road  construction 
and  cover  removal.  Available  acres  of  old  growth 
and  excellent  pine  marten  habitat  would  remain 
unchanged.  However,  the  opportunity  to  increase 
habitat  diversity  and  EHP  would  be  lost.  Goshawk 
habitat  would  remain  at  its  naturally  low  value. 


Alternative  2 

About  4 miles  of  road  would  be  built  in  Area  I to 
harvest  timber  from  approximately  21 4 acres.  This 
area  is  cover  limiting  for  elk  and  is  essentially  un- 
roaded  at  present  with  an  open  (and  total)  road 
density  of  0.14  miles/square  mile.  This  action 
would  reduce  the  covenforage  ratio  from  32:68  to 
27:73  and  the  EHP  would  be  reduced  from  67 
percent  to  51  percent.  The  total  road  density 
would  increase  to  1 .46  mile/square  mile.  A limited 
amount  of  road  building  and  timber  harvesting 
would  occur  in  the  Salt  Creek  portion  of  this  area. 
Consequently,  some  of  the  big  game  security  area 
on  the  south  side  of  Salt  Creek,  particularly  in  the 
head  of  the  drainage,  would  remain  useable  as 
would  the  high  use  forage  area  on  the  north  side. 
Overall  elk  security  would  be  low  and  vulnerability 
would  be  very  high. 

The  timbered/nontimbered  ecotones  in  this  area 
would  be  buffered  by  leaving  uncut  strips  at  least 
100  feet  wide  between  them  and  all  proposed 
units.  No  units  are  proposed  within  areas  desig- 
nated as  old-growth  retention  stands  in  the  Forest 
Plan.  However,  the  total  old  growth  available  to 
species  dependent  on  this  type  of  wildlife  habitat 
would  be  decreased  by  approximately  the  full  214 
acres  of  harvest  units.  None  of  these  units  contain 
significant  amounts  of  Englemann  spruce,  and 
pine  marten  habitat  would  therefore  not  be  signifi- 
cantly decreased  by  the  harvest. 


IV  -36 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


TABLE  IV-8:  EFFECTS  TO  WILDLIFE  HABITAT  IN  THE  MOYER  SALT  ANALYSIS  AREA 

Measurement  ALT  ALT  ALT  ALT  ALT  ALT  ALT 

Indices  1 2 3 4 5 6 2A 

PREFERRED 


WILDLIFE 
Elk  and  Deer: 

* Elk  Habitat  Potential  (EHP)  (Percent  of  potential) 


Area  1 

67% 

51% 

51% 

48% 

59% 

51% 

53% 

Area  II 

87% 

90% 

88% 

92% 

88% 

90% 

89% 

Open  Road  Density: 

(Miles  road  per  square  mile) 

Area  1 

0.14 

0.14 

0.14 

0.14 

0.14 

0.14 

0.14 

Area  II 

0.56 

0.56 

0.56 

0.56 

0.56 

0.56 

0.56 

Total  Road  Density: 

(Miles  road  per  square  mile) 

Area  1 

0.14 

1.46 

2.25 

1.0 

0.14 

1.0 

1.28 

Area  II 

0.56 

2.5 

1.5 

2.9 

0.72 

2.7 

2.42 

Cover  to  Forage  Ratio: 

Area  1 

32:68 

27:73 

27:73 

26:74 

29.71 

27.73 

28.72 

Area  II 

80:20 

72:28 

75:25 

68:32 

77.23 

69.31 

73.27 

**  Elk  Habitat  Security: 

Area  1 

High 

Low 

Moderate 

Very  Low 

Moderate 

Low 

Low 

Area  II 

Very  High 

High 

High 

High 

Very  High 

High 

High 

***  Elk  Vulnerability: 

Area  1 

Moderate 

Very  High 

High 

Very  High 

High 

Very  High 

Very  High 

Area  II 

Very  Low 

Moderate 

Low 

Moderate 

Low 

Moderate 

Moderate 

****  Old-growth  Dependent  Species: 

Acres  of  Timber  Stands  with  Old  Growth  Characteristics  Remaining: 

Area  1 

1750 

1500 

1520 

1430 

1625 

1475 

1540 

Area  II 

3550 

3200 

3250 

3025 

3310 

3040 

3250 

Percent  Loss  of  Timber  Stands  with  Old  Growth  Characteristics: 

Area  1 

0% 

15% 

13% 

18% 

7% 

16% 

12% 

Area  II 

0% 

10% 

8% 

15% 

5% 

14% 

8% 

Acres  of  Forest  Plan  Designated  Old-Growth  Retention  Stands  Cut: 

Area  1 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

Area  II 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

* Elk  Habitat  Potential  (EHP)  is  the  indicator  for  effects  to  elk  and  deer  and  is  derived  from  the  cover  to  forage  ratio  and  the  miles  of  road  per  square  mile. 
**  Elk  Habitat  Security  is  30%  of  an  area  occupied  by  cover  blocks  of  250  acres  located  1/2  mile  from  open  roads. 

***  Elk  Vulnerability  reflects  ease  of  human  access  and  susceptibility  of  hunted  elk. 

****  The  acres  and  percent  loss  of  timber  stands  with  old  growth  characteristics  and  old-growth  retention  stands  are  the  indicators  for  effects  to  goshawk, 
pine  marten  and  other  old-growth  dependent  species. 


IV -37 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sale  FSmafi  ESS 


Chapter  IV 


Trapper  access  via  snowmachime  would  be  facili- 
tated by  construction  of  the  proposed  roads,  if 
they  were  to  remain  open  to  motorized  traffic. 

All  of  the  forested  portions  of  this  area  offer  accept- 
able or  better  goshawk  nesting  habitat.  In  particu- 
lar, the  Douglas-fir  stands  with  an  average  diame- 
ter at  breast  height  (dbh)  of  eight  inches  or 
greater,  canopy  cover  of  40  percent  or  more,  and 
an  average  stand  size  of  at  least  25  acres  provides 
very  good  nesting  habitat  for  this  species.  One 
hundred  and  sixty-six  acres  of  this  habitat  would 
be  lost  under  this  alternative. 

About  13  miles  of  road  would  be  built  in  Area  II  to 
harvest  timber  from  358  acres.  This  area  is  cur- 
rently forage  limiting  and  has  a road  density  of  0.56 
mile/square  mile.  The  existing  coverforage  ratio  of 
80:20  would  be  changed  to  72:28  and  the  EHP 
would  increase  from  87  percent  to  90  percent. 
Total  road  density  would  increase  to  approxi- 
mately 2.50  mile/square  mile.  Consequently,  the 
high  value  this  area  has  as  big  game  security/ 
hiding  cover  would  be  slightly  decreased,  but 
would  remain  high  and  vulnerability  would  be 
moderate.  No  proposed  units  are  within  old- 
growth  retention  stands,  however  virtually  the  en- 
tire 358  acres  to  be  harvested  are  currently  in  an 
old-growth  condition.  In  other  words,  358  acres  or 
approximately  10  percent  of  the  existing  old 
growth  in  this  area  would  be  removed  by  this  entry. 
Two  proposed  units  in  this  area  contain  significant 
amounts  of  Englemann  spruce,  but  this  alternative 
would  not  measurably  decrease  pine  marten  habi- 
tat since  only  1 0 percent  of  the  total  area  is  being 
harvested.  The  virtually  unbroken  stands  of  timber 
and  small  amount  of  Douglas-fir  present  on  this 
area  naturally  limits  the  current  goshawk  habitat 
potential.  Creation  of  artificial  ecotones  along  the 
cutting  units  may  actually  increase  the  foraging 
habitat  for  this  species. 

Alternative  3 

In  Area  I,  all  predicted  effects  are  essentially  identi- 
cal to  those  under  Alternative  2.  However,  this  al- 
ternative requires  3 miles  of  additional  road  con- 
struction due  to  the  different  access  route. 
Consequently,  the  total  post-sale  road  density 
would  increase  to  2.25  miles/square  mile,  but  the 
open  road  density  would  remain  at  0.14  mile/ 
square  mil®.  This  alternative  would  require  hauling 
all  the  volume  out  of  this  area  through  the  entire 
Woodtick  Road  (FS  Road  #107)  system.  This 


would  eliminate  that  area  from  use  as  a displace- 
ment area  for  big  game.  In  addition,  heavy  elk  use 
now  occurs  in  and  is  associated  with  the  old  Salt 
Creek  and  Woodtick  Creek  Timber  Sale  cutting 
units  as  a result  of  improved  cover  to  forage  ratios 
in  this  area.  This  use  would  be  disrupted  as  timber 
is  hauled  out  of  the  area  along  the  Woodtick  Road. 
Also,  this  alternative  would  construct  a road 
through  the  heavily  used  Salt  Creek  drainage  and 
thus  impact  a key  elk  summer/fall  range  and  an 
area  of  very  good  security  cover  on  the  north- 
facing slope  of  the  Salt  Creek  drainage. 

Overall  habitat  security  would  be  moderate  and 
vulnerability  would  be  high. 

In  Area  II,  the  post-sale  coverdorage  ratio  would  be 
75:25  and  the  EHP  would  increase  slightly  to  88 
percent.  Total  road  density  would  be  1.5  mile/ 
square  mile  but  open  road  density  would  be  0.56 
mile/square  mile,  the  same  as  for  all  other  action 
alternatives.  This  alternative  would  not  impact  a 
large  area  of  key  elk  summer  range,  as  mapped  in 
the  Forest  Plan  and  shown  on  Figure  111-2.  Conse- 
quently, an  unroaded  area  of  excellent  security/ 
hiding  cover  would  be  retained  between  Area  I and 
Area  It.  Habitat  security  would  remain  high  and 
vulnerability  would  be  low. 

The  predicted  effects  on  goshawk  habitat  would 
not  be  significantly  different  from  Alternative  2. 
However,  this  alternative  would  affect  153  fewer 
acres  of  old  growth  and  pine  marten  habitat  than 
the  previous  alternative. 

Alternative  4 

In  Area  I,  about  4 miles  of  road  would  be  built  to 
harvest  timber  from  approximately  322  acres.  This 
action  would  reduce  the  coverforage  ratio  from 
32:68  to  26:74,  and  the  EHP  would  be  reduced 
from  70  percent  to  48  percent.  The  total  road  den- 
sity would  increase  to  1 .0  mile/sq.  mile.  This  alter- 
native would  require  hauling  all  the  volume  out  of 
this  area  through  two  routes,  FS  Road  #106  and 
the  entire  Woodtick  Road  (FS  Road  #1 07)  system. 
As  with  Alternative  3,  the  elk  use  associated  with 
the  old  Salt  Creek  and  Woodtick  Creek  Timber 
Sale  cutting  units  would  be  disrupted  as  timber  is 
hauled  out  of  the  area  along  the  Woodtick  Road. 
Overall  effects  in  the  Salt  Creek  and  Perm  Creek 
area  would  be  similar  to  those  described  in  Alter- 
native 2,  but  the  large  clearcuts  (Units  S6, 26,  and 
30)  would  further  reduce  cover  in  this  cover- 
limiting  area,  would  not  be  utilized  as  well  for  big 


IV -38 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


game  forage,  and  would  have  a greater  effect  on 
small  game,  non-game,  and  old-growth  depend- 
ent species.  Elk  habitat  security  would  become 
very  low  and  vulnerability  would  be  very  high.  Pine 
marten  population  viability  would  not  be  affected, 
but  individual  home  ranges  would  be  adversely 
affected.  One  hundred  seventy  eight  acres  of  suit- 
able Northern  goshawk  nesting  habitat  would  be 
lost  under  this  alternative,  but  this  would  not  affect 
population  viability. 

In  Area  II,  approximately  14  miles  of  road  would  be 
built  to  harvest  timber  from  approximately  525 
acres  of  harvest  units.  This  action  would  reduce 
the  cover:forage  ratio  from  80:20  to  68:32  and  the 
EHP  would  increase  from  87  percent  to  92  per- 
cent. The  overall  potential  effects,  including  effects 
to  pine  marten  and  goshawk,  would  be  similar  to 
those  described  for  Alternative  2.  However,  units 
1W,  2W,  3W,  and  4W  would  be  placed  in  an  area 
that  currently  provides  very  good  security  cover  for 
big  game.  Elk  (i.e.  big  game)  habitat  security  and 
vulnerability  would  be  similar  to  that  listed  for  alter- 
native 2.  (Effects  on  security  habitat  are  hard  to 
quantify,  but  this  alternative  would  definitely  be 
less  favorable  to  the  wildlife  resources,  particularly 
the  hunted  big  game  species,  than  any  of  the  other 
action  alternatives). 

Alternative  5 

In  Area  I,  helicopters  would  be  used  to  harvest 
timber  from  approximately  1 68  acres.  This  action 
would  not  require  any  new  road  construction  but 
would  reduce  the  cover:  forage  ratio  from  32:68  to 
29:71 . The  EHP  in  this  cover  limiting  area  would  be 
reduced  from  67  percent  to  59  percent.  Big  game 
habitat  security  in  the  Salt  Creek  area  would  re- 
main relatively  unchanged.  However,  this  alterna- 
tive would  also  require  hauling  on  both  routes  (FS 
#106  and  #107)  with  short  term  effects  similar  to 
that  discussed  under  Alternatives  3 and  4.  Big 
game  habitat  security  would  be  moderate  and  vul- 
nerability would  be  high.  Predicted  effects  on  old 
growth,  goshawk  and  pine  marten  habitats  would 
be  similar  but  less  than  what  was  predicted  for 
Alternative  2;  and,  no  additional  access  would  be 
provided  for  pine  marten  trappers. 

In  Area  II,  approximately  1.2  miles  of  new  road 
would  be  constructed  to  harvest  timber  from  ap- 
proximately 124  acres.  The  existing  cover:forage 
ratio  would  change  form  80:20  to  77:23  and  EHP 
would  increase  very  slightly  to  88  percent.  Predict- 


ed effects  on  big  game  would  be  very  similar  to 
that  stated  for  Alternative  3.  However,  big  game 
habitat  security  would  remain  higher  due  to  less 
new  road  construction.  Effects  on  old  growth, 
goshawk  and  pine  marten  habitat  would  be  less 
but  very  similar  to  Alternative  3;  but,  it  would  affect 
approximately  1 70  acres  less  of  such  habitat. 

Alternative  6 PREFERRED 

Predicted  effects  of  this  alternative  on  big  game 
are  almost  identical  to  Alternative  4 except  that 
islands  of  uncut  timber  will  be  retained  in  most 
units.  Consequently,  even  though  the  units  are 
identical,  the  cover:forage  ratio  will  only  drop  to 
27:33  and  69:31  in  Areas  I and  II,  respectively. 
These  islands  will  constitute  up  to  15  percent  of 
the  area  within  the  unit  boundaries.  As  a result,  this 
alternative  will  provide  some  big  game  bedding 
areas  within  the  created  forage  units,  particularly 
for  mule  deer.  The  islands  will  help  break  the  long 
sight  distances  normally  found  in  new  harvest 
units  and  promote  big  game  use  of  the  forage  by 
conveying  a more  forested  appearance.  Big  game 
habitat  security  would  be  low  in  Area  I but  high  in 
Area  II  and  vulnerability  would  be  very  high  and 
moderate,  respectively.  This  harvest  prescription 
will  also  result  In  a much  shorter  cover  regenera- 
tion time.  In  addition,  leaving  uncut  islands  will 
more  than  satisfy  FLRMP  snag  and  snag  replace- 
ment direction  and  contribute  greatly  to  habitat 
diversity,  particularly  for  small  birds  and  mammals. 

The  predicted  effects  on  old  growth,  pine  marten 
and  goshawk  habitats  would  not  be  significantly 
different  from  Alternative  4. 

Alternative  2A 

Predicted  effects  of  this  alternative  on  big  game 
are  almost  identical  to  Alternative  2 except  that 
islands  of  uncut  timber  will  be  retained  in  most 
units.  Consequently,  even  though  most  units  are 
identical,  the  covenforage  ratio  will  be  only  drop  to 
28:72  and  73:27  in  Areas  I and  II,  respectively. 
These  islands  will  constitute  up  to  30  percent  of 
the  area  within  unit  boundaries.  As  a result,  this 
alternative  will  provide  some  big  game  bedding 
areas  and  limited  cover  within  the  created  forage 
areas,  particularly  for  mule  deer.  Big  game  habitat 
security  and  vulnerability  would  be  identical  to  Al- 
ternative 2 for  both  areas.  The  islands  will  help 
break  the  long  sight  distances  normally  found  in 
new  harvest  units  and  promote  big  game  use  of 


IV -39 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


the  forage  by  conveying  a more  forested  appear- 
ance. 

This  harvest  prescription  will  also  result  in  a much 
shorter  cover  regeneration  time.  In  addition,  leav- 
ing uncut  islands  will  more  than  satisfy  FLRMP 
snag  and  snag  replacement  direction  and  con- 
tribute greatly  to  habitat  diversity,  particularly  for 
small  birds  and  mammals. 

The  predicted  effects  on  old  growth,  pine  marten 
and  goshawk  habitats  would  not  be  significantly 
different  from  Alternative  2. 


CUMULATIVE  EFFECTS 

The  proposed  future  activities  would  be  conduct- 
ed in  compliance  with  Forest  Plan  snag  retention 
and  replacement  guidelines  and  would  not  impact 
designated  old-growth  retention  stands.  Conse- 
quently, population  viability  of  cavity  nesting 
species  and  old-growth  dependent  species  would 
not  be  affected.  However,  the  habitat  for  these 
species  would  be  decreased  and  local  numbers 
may  be  affected  until  stands  regenerate  to  an  old- 
growth  condition. 

Future  timber  harvest  in  Area  II  would,  if  performed 
in  compliance  with  Forest  Plan  Wildlife  Standards 
and  Guidelines  (IV-121),  help  bring  the  big  game 
covenforage  ratio  closer  to  the  desired  40:60  ratio. 
Additional  road  construction  would  negate  some 
of  the  anticipated  benefits;  however,  EHP  would 
most  likely  remain  in  the  85  to  95  percent  range. 
Forest  Plan  wildlife  goals  and  objectives,  preclude 
any  future  timber  harvest  in  Analysis  Area  1 until  the 
Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  cutting  units  return  to  cov- 
er. 


CONSISTENCY  WITH  FOREST  PLAN 
STANDARDS  AND  GUIDELINES 

The  proposed  timber  harvest  and  road  construc- 
tion activities  in  all  action  alternatives,  with  mitiga- 
tion measures,  meet  Forest  Plan  standards  and 
guidelines  for  wildlife  in  Mangement  Areas  3A-5A 
and  3A-5B  (Forest  Plan,  IV-121).  Forest  Plan 
standards  and  guidelines  for  old  growth  and  snag 
management  will  also  be  met  for  all  alternatives. 


EFFECTS  TO  THREATENED, 
ENDANGERED  AND  SENSIT8VE 

SPECIES 

In  accordance  with  Forest  Service  Manual 
2672.42,  a Biological  Evaluation  was  prepared  to 
assess  the  potential  impacts  of  the  proposed  tim- 
ber harvest  activities  on  terrestrial  vertebrates  and 
plants  listed  on  the  U.S.  Forest  Service  Intermoun- 
tain Region  Vertebrate  Sensitive  Species  (VSS)  list 
(Appendix  G).  Separate  Biological  Assessments  of 
the  potential  impacts  of  the  proposed  activities  on 
listed  and  proposed  Threatened  and  Endangered 
terrestrial  and  aquatic  vertebrate  species  (same 
BA  as  in  DEIS  covering  4 alternatives)  were  also 
prepared  (Appendix  F).  The  following  sections 
summarize  those  biological  analyses;  the  reader  is 
referred  to  Appendices  F and  G for  a more  detailed 
description  of  the  potential  impacts  to  these 
species. 


EFFECTS  TO  THREATENED  AND  ENDAN- 
GERED AQUATIC  VERTEBRATE  SPECIES 

As  required  by  Section  7(c)  of  the  Endangered 
Species  Act,  the  U.S.  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service 
(USFWS)  was  contacted  in  order  to  determine 
whether  any  listed  or  proposed  Threatened  or  En- 
dangered species  are  known  to  occur  in  the  analy- 
sis area  (letter,  USFWS,  January  29,  1991).  The 
Fish  and  Wildlife  Service  determined  that  no 
Threatened  or  Endangered  Species  are  present  in 
the  analysis  area. 

Since  that  determination,  however,  the  Snake  Riv- 
er spring  and  summer  Chinook  salmon  has  been 
listed  as  a 'Threatened’  Species  (Federal  Regis- 
ter, April  22,  1992;  Effective  date  May  22,  1992) 
and  the  Snake  River  Basin  sockeye  has  been  list- 
ed as  an  'Endangered’  species  (Federal  Register, 
November  20,  1992;  Effective  date  December  20, 
1992). 


EFFECTS  TO  THREATENED  AND  ENDAN- 
GERED TERRESTRIAL  VERTEBRATE  SPECIES 

No  listed  terrestrial  species  were  included  on  the 
original  species  list  (FWS-1  -4-91  -SP-204)  for  this 
project.  The  Endangered  gray  wolf  was  subse- 
quently added  when  the  terrestrial  portion  of  this 
list  was  updated  on  March  31 , 1 993.  A Biological 


IV -40 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sale  Final  EiS 


Chapter  IV 


Assessment  (BA)  was  prepared  to  assess  predict- 
ed affects  on  this  species.  The  BA  concluded  that 
the  project  'may  affect  but  is  not  likely  to  adversely 
affect  the  Endangered  gray  wolf,  its  habitat  or  its 
recovery  potential.*  For  a more  complete  review  of 
this  assessment  see  Appendix  F. 


EFFECTS  TO  ENDANGERED  FISH  SPECIES 
COMMON  TO  ALL  ALTERNATIVES 


A Biological  Assessment  (BA)  of  the  effects  of  the 
proposed  road  construction  and  timber  harvest 
alternatives  was  prepared  for  the  Moyer  Salt  DEIS 
(see  Moyer  Salt  DEIS  and  FEIS,  Appendix  F). 

Recent  agreements  between  the  Forest  Service 
and  the  National  Marine  Fisheries  Service,  howev- 
er, have  specified  both  a modification  of  BA  format- 
ting, and  expansion  of  project  analysis  to  encom- 
pass possible  cumulative  subbasin  effects  as  well 
as  direct  and  indirect  project  level  effects.  The  final 
Moyer  Salt  Biological  Assessment  of  effects  to 
Snake  River  spring/summer  Chinook  and  sockeye 
salmon  is,  therefore,  being  documented  within  the 
Salmon  National  Forest’s  Proposed  Activity  Re- 
view for  the  Panther  Creek  Watershed. 

The  effects  analysis  methodology  specified  for  this 
Proposed  Activity  Review  places  a strong  empha- 
sis on  risks  of  temperature  and  sedimentation  ef- 
fects. As  the  original,  independent  BA  prepared  for 
the  Moyer  Salt  DEIS  document  included  discus- 
sions of  these  temperature  and  sedimentation 
risks,  conclusions  within  the  pending  Proposed 
Activity  Review  are  not  expected  to  deviate  from 
those  of  the  independent  analysis. 

Snake  River  Sockeye  Salmon  ( Oncorhynchus 
nerka):  Sockeye  salmon  of  the  Snake  River  sys- 
tem spawn  and  rear  in  the  morianal  lakes  of  Stan- 
ley Basin  and  the  Sawtooth  Valley  within  the  Saw- 
tooth National  Recreation  Area  of  the  Sawtooth 
National  Forest.  The  immigration  and  emigration 
route  to  and  from  these  nursery  areas  encompass- 
es the  mainstem  Columbia,  Snake,  and  Salmon 
Rivers,  including  Salmon  River  corridor  areas  un- 
der the  administration  of  the  Salmon  National  For- 
est. Although  sockeye  salmon  utilize  the  mainstem 
Salmon  during  their  migrations  to  and  from  ocean- 
ic feeding  areas,  they  do  not  utilize  any  off-river 
tributary  streams  administered  by  the  Salmon  Na- 
tional Forest  for  spawning  or  rearing  purposes. 


Analysis  has  determined  that  the  seven  alterna- 
tives identified  within  the  Moyer  Salt  FEIS  would 
have  "No  Effect*  upon  Snake  River  sockeye 
salmon  habitat,  migration  opportunities,  or  popu- 
lations. This  determination  reflects  a revision  of  the 
original  determination  of  "Not  Likely  to  Adversely 
Affect*  and  is  based  upon  additional  analysis  and 
consultation  with  Forest  Hydrology,  Engineering 
and  Fisheries  personnel. 


EFFECTS  TO  THREATENED  FISH  SPECIES 

Snake  River  sprlng/summer  Chinook  salmon 
(Oncorhynchus  tshawytscha ):  The  Panther 
Creek  drainage  system  was  historically  a major 
producer  of  spring  Chinook  salmon  (Reiser,  1986). 
These  historical  runs  died  out  in  the  1 960s  due  to 
the  chemical  pollution  of  mid  and  lower  mainstem 
Panther  Creek  by  mining  activities  (Reiser,  1 986; 
Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game,  1965). 

However,  Panther  Creek  and  its  historically  utilized 
tributaries,  including  Moyer  Creek,  continue  to  be 
regarded  as  potentially  viable  producers  of  spring/ 
summer  Chinook  salmon  (Northwest  Power  Plan- 
ning Council,  1988).  The  Forest  Plan  calls  for  con- 
tinued management  directed  toward  these 
anadromous  stocks  in  anticipation  of  correction  of 
mine  drainage  problems  and  recovery  of  main- 
stem  water  quality.  Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and 
Game  management  prescriptions  for  the  two 
streams  calls  for  a preservation  management 
strategy  for  anadromous  fish  stocks,  which  main- 
tains a harvest  closure  and  may  supplement  natu- 
ral recruitment  with  fry  stockings  (Idaho  Depart- 
ment of  Fish  and  Game,  1991). 

Alternative  1 - No  Action 

This  alternative  would  have  "No  Effect"  upon 
Snake  River  spring/summer  Chinook  salmon  habi- 
tat or  populations.  No  road  construction  or  timber 
harvest  activities  would  occur,  and  no  associated 
change  in  Chinook  salmon  habitat  capability  from 
current  conditions  would  be  expected.  Changes  to 
streamcourses  would  be  expected  to  occur  in  re- 
sponse to  natural  events  such  as  fire,  insect  infes- 
tation and  subsequent  loss  of  forested  cover,  and 
other  natural  processes. 

Under  the  no  action  alternative,  the  existing 
Woodtick  Creek  culvert  (Township  20  N,  Range  1 9 
E,  Section  32)  would  not  be  reconstructed  or  re- 


IV -41 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


placed,  and  would  continue  to  present  a barrier  to 
upstream  steelhead  and  resident  trout  passage. 
Failure  to  correct  this  barrier  would  have  no  effect 
on  upper  Panther  Creek  Chinook  salmon  popula- 
tions, as  this  species  is  not  known  to  utilize  the 
Woodtick  Creek  drainage. 

Re-utilization  of  Chinook  salmon  spawning  and 
rearing  habitats  in  Moyer  Creek,  where  historical 
use  has  been  known  to  occur,  would  be  contin- 
gent upon  recovery  of  mainstem  Panther  Creek 
water  quality  and  the  reintroduction  of  the  fish. 

Alternatives  2,  4,  5,  6,  and  2A 

With  implementation  of  Forest  Plan  soil  and  water 
Best  Management  Practices  (BMPs)  (Appendix  B) 
and  proposed  site-specific  soil,  water  and  fisheries 
mitigation  measures  (Chapter  II,  Table  11-1),  the 
road  construction  and  timber  harvest  activities 
proposed  under  each  of  Alternatives  2, 4,  5, 6,  and 
2A  are  “Not  Likely  to  Adversely  Affect1  Snake  River 
spring/summer  Chinook  salmon  populations  or 
habitat  within  the  Moyer  Creek  drainage.  Addition- 
ally, no  adverse  effects  to  Chinook  salmon  popula- 
tions in  mainstem  Panther  Creek  waters  would  be 
anticipated  as  a result  of  implementation  of  these 
proposed  alternatives. 


Alternative  3 

Alternative  3 exhibits  a high  risk  of  adversely  im- 
pacting the  water  quality  and  substrates  of  the  Salt 
Creek  stream  channel  due  to  sediment  introduc- 
tion at  the  proposed  Salt  Creek  stream  crossing. 
Steep  sideslopes  at  this  site  preclude  flat,  perpen- 
dicular road  approaches,  and  the  proximity  of  road 
to  the  Salt  Creek  stream  channel  inhibits  applica- 
tion of  mitigation  measures  designed  to  intercept 
overland  transport  of  fill  slope  materials.  The  sedi- 
mentation risk  associated  with  this  Salt  Creek 
crossing,  coupled  with  the  prediction  of  BOISED 
modeling  that  this  alternative  will  inherently  gener- 
ate the  most  amount  of  sediment  of  seven  alterna- 
tives analyzed,  indicates  that  this  alternative,  as 
currently  designed,  is  likely  to  produce  adverse 
impacts  to  the  substrates  and  water  quality  of  this 
stream.  As  the  scope  of  these  impacts  may  include 
potential  Chinook  salmon  rearing  areas  within  the 
lower  reaches  of  Salt  Creek,  and  could  potentially 
extend  to  important  Chinook  salmon  spawning  and 
rearing  habitats  within  the  mainstem  reaches  of 
Moyer  Creek,  this  alternative  has  been  determined 


to  be  “Likely  to  Adversely  Affect*  Snake  River 
spring/summer  Chinook  salmon. 


EFFECTS  TO  SENSITIVE  SPECIES 

The  Biological  Evaluation  for  terrestrial  vertebrates 
and  plants  and  the  Biological  Evaluation  for  aquat- 
ic vertebrates  that  were  prepared  for  the  analysis 
area  address  the  potential  impacts  of  the  pro- 
posed timber  harvest  activities  on  species  listed 
on  the  U.S.  Forest  Service  Intermountain  Region 
Vertebrate  Sensitive  Species  (VSS)  list  (Appendix 
G). 

Some  of  these  species  are  also  listed  on  the  Idaho 
Department  of  Fish  and  Game  Species  of  Special 
Concern  (SSC)  list.  The  Forest  Service  Intermoun- 
tain Region  VSS  list  contains  29  vertebrate  species 
and  the  Forest  Service  Intermountain  Sensitive 
Plant  List  contains  12  species  that  may  occur  on 
the  Salmon  National  Forest.  As  discussed  in 
Chapter  III,  one  terrestrial  and  two  aquatic  verte- 
brate sensitive  species  have  been  observed  and 
are  thus  known  to  occur  in  this  analysis  area.  How- 
ever, habitat  for  several  other  species  also  occurs 
in  the  area,  and  potential  effects  to  those  habitats 
are  evaluated.  The  reader  is  referred  to  Appendix 
G for  a more  detailed  description  of  the  habitat 
requirements  of  these  species. 


EFFECTS  TO  SENSITIVE  AQUATIC 
VERTEBRATE  SPECIES 

Several  sensitive  fish  species  or  their  habitat  occur 
within  the  analysis  area.  The  U.S.  Forest  Service 
Intermountain  Region  VSS  List  includes  steelhead 
trout,  westslope  cutthroat  trout,  and  bull  trout. 
Those  species  whose  habitat  occurs  in  the  analy- 
sis area  are  listed  below  with  a short  description  of 
the  potential  effects  of  the  proposed  project. 


Steelhead  trout  (Oncorhynchus  mykiss):  Al- 
though steelhead  are  currently  not  utilizing  the  up- 
per Panther  Creek  system  because  of  die-off 
caused  by  mainstem  water  quality  problems  as  a 
result  of  chemical  pollution  from  mining,  the 
Salmon  National  Forest  Plan  calls  for  continued 
management  directed  toward  anadromous  habitat 
maintenance  within  Panther  Creek  and  its  major 
tributaries. 


IV -42 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


Alternative  1 - No  Action 

Under  this  alternative  no  road  construction  or  tim- 
ber harvest  activities  would  occur.  This  alternative 
would,  therefore,  have  'No  Effect"  upon  existing 
steelhead  habitat  or  population  status.  However, 
an  existing  60  inch  culvert  in  Township  20  N, 
Range  1 9 E,  Section  32  which  is  currently  a barrier 
to  both  resident  and  anadromous  fish  passage  in 
Woodtick  Creek  would  not  be  repaired  or  replaced 
through  timber  program  funding,  and  would  con- 
tinue to  limit  utilization  of  approximately  three  and 
one-half  miles  of  spawning  and  rearing  habitat 
above  that  location.  As  steelhead  are  not  currently 
utilizing  the  upper  Panther  Creek  watershed  due 
to  mainstem  water  quality  problems,  the  immedi- 
ate significance  of  impaired  passage  is  restricted 
to  resident  trout  species,  including  bull  trout.  How- 
ever, upon  recovery  of  Panther  Creek  water  quality 
and  re-utilization  of  currently  unused  upper- 
drainage  tributary  spawning  and  rearing  habitats, 
this  barrier  may  become  of  significance  to  steel- 
head production  within  the  Woodtick  Creek 
drainage.  Other  funding  mechanisms  might  be 
employed  to  repair  or  replace  this  passage  barrier. 

Alternatives  2,  4,  5,  6,  and  2A 

Alternatives  2,  4,  5,  6,  and  2A  are  expected  to  be 
fully  successful  in  avoiding  or  minimizing  short  and 
long  term  effects  to  fisheries  habitats  and  preserv- 
ing fish  migration  opportunities  within  the  Moyer 
Creek  and  Woodtick  Creek  drainages  through  ap- 
plication of  Best  Management  Practices  (BMPs) 
and  site-specific  mitigation  measures.  These  alter- 
natives are,  therefore,  "Not  Likely  to  Result  in  a 
Trend  Toward  Federal  Listing"  of  steelhead. 
Restoration  of  fish  passage  capabilities  at  the  site 
of  an  existing  culvert  in  Township  20  N,  Range  19 
E,  Section  32  would  additionally  reopen  approxi- 
mately three  and  one  half  additional  miles  of  po- 
tential steelhead  spawning  and  rearing  habitat  in 
the  Woodtick  Creek  drainage. 

Alternative  3 

Alternative  3 exhibits  a high  risk  of  adversely  im- 
pacting the  water  quality  and  substrates  of  the  Salt 
Creek  stream  channel  due  to  sediment  introduc- 
tion at  the  proposed  Salt  Creek  stream  crossing. 
Steep  sideslopes  at  this  site  preclude  flat,  perpen- 
dicular road  approaches,  and  the  proximity  of  road 
to  the  Salt  Creek  stream  channel  inhibits  applica- 
tion of  mitigation  measures  designed  to  intercept 


overland  transport  of  fill  slope  materials.  The  sedi- 
mentation risk  associated  with  this  Salt  Creek 
crossing,  coupled  with  the  prediction  of  BOISED 
modeling  that  this  alternative  will  inherently  gener- 
ate the  most  amount  of  sediment  of  seven  alterna- 
tives analyzed,  indicates  that  this  alternative,  as 
currently  designed,  is  likely  to  produce  adverse 
impacts  to  the  substrates  and  water  quality  of  this 
stream.  As  the  scope  of  these  impacts  may  include 
Potential  steelhead  rearing  areas  within  the  lower 
reaches  of  Salt  Creek,  and  could  potentially  ex- 
tend to  spawning  and  rearing  habitats  within  the 
mainstem  reaches  of  Moyer  Creek,  this  alternative 
has  been  determined  to  be  "Likely  to  Result  in  a 
Trend  Toward  Federal  Listing"  of  Steelhead. 

Bull  trout  (Salvelinus  confluentus):  Bull  trout  cur- 
rently utilize  the  mid  and  upper  reaches  of  the 
Moyer  Creek  and  Woodtick  Creek  watersheds. 

Alternative  1 - No  Action 

Under  this  alternative  no  road  construction  or  tim- 
ber harvest  activities  would  occur.  This  alternative 
would,  therefore,  have  "No  Effect"  upon  existing 
bull  trout  habitat  or  population  status. 

An  existing  60  inch  culvert  in  Township  20  N, 
Range  1 9 E,  Section  32  which  is  currently  a barrier 
to  both  resident  and  anadromous  fish  passage  in 
Woodtick  Creek  would  not  be  repaired  or  replaced 
through  timber  program  funding,  and  would  con- 
tinue to  preclude  bull  trout  access  to  approxi- 
mately three  and  one-half  miles  of  spawning  and 
rearing  habitat  during  high  flow  periods.  Other 
funding  mechanisms  might  be  employed  to  repair 
or  replace  this  passage  barrier. 

Alternatives  2,  4,  5,  6,  and  2A 

Alternatives  2,  4,  5,  6,  and  2A  are  expected  to  be 
fully  successful  in  avoiding  or  minimizing  short  and 
long  term  effects  to  fisheries  habitats  and  preserv- 
ing fish  migration  opportunities  within  the  Moyer 
Creek  and  Woodtick  Creek  drainages  through  ap- 
plication of  Best  Management  Practices  (BMPs) 
and  site-specific  mitigation  measures.  These  alter- 
native are,  therefore,  "Not  Likely  to  Result  in  a 
Trend  Toward  Federal  Listing"  of  bull  trout. 
Restoration  of  fish  passage  capabilities  at  the  site 
of  an  existing  culvert  in  Township  20  N,  Range  19 
E,  Section  32  would  additionally  reopen  approxi- 
mately three  and  one  half  additional  miles  of  po- 


IV -43 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  SaSe  Final  E1S 


Chapter  IV 


tential  bull  trout  spawning  and  rearing  habitat  in 
the  Woodtick  Creek  drainage. 

Alternative  3 

Alternative  3 exhibits  a high  risk  of  adversely  im- 
pacting the  water  quality  and  substrates  of  the  Salt 
Creek  stream  channel  due  to  sediment  introduc- 
tion at  the  proposed  Salt  Creek  stream  crossing. 
Steep  sideslopes  at  this  site  preclude  flat,  perpen- 
dicular road  approaches,  and  the  proximity  of  road 
to  the  Salt  Creek  stream  channel  inhibits  applica- 
tion of  mitigation  measures  designed  to  intercept 
overland  transport  of  fill  slope  materials.  The  sedi- 
mentation risk  associated  with  this  Salt  Creek 
crossing,  coupled  with  the  prediction  of  BOISED 
modeling  that  this  alternative  will  inherently  gener- 
ate the  most  amount  of  sediment  of  seven  alterna- 
tives analyzed,  indicates  that  this  alternative,  as 
currently  designed,  is  likely  to  produce  adverse 
impacts  to  the  substrates  and  water  quality  of  this 
stream.  As  the  scope  of  these  impacts  may  include 
potential  bull  trout  rearing  areas  within  the  lower 
reaches  of  Salt  Creek,  and  could  potentially  ex- 
tend to  spawning  and  rearing  habitats  within  the 
mainstem  reaches  of  Moyer  Creek,  this  alternative 
is*  Likely  to  Result  in  a Trend  Toward  Federal  List- 
ing” of  bull  trout. 

Westslope  cutthroat  trout  (Oncorhynchus 
clarki):  Although  aquatic  habitat  capable  of  sup- 
porting cutthrout  trout  exists  within  both  Moyer 
Creek  and  Woodtick  Creek,  no  documentation  of 
the  presence  of  this  species  has  been  recorded  in 
these  two  streams.  The  small  populations  of  cut- 
throat trout  existing  in  Panther  Creek  are  found 
almost  exclusively  in  that  portion  of  the  stream 
above  the  mouth  of  Moyer  Creek.  The  seven  pro- 
posed alternatives,  therefore,  are  expected  to 
have  "No  Effect"  on  cutthroat  trout  within  the  Pan- 
ther Creek  drainage. 


EFFECTS  TO  SENSITIVE  TERRESTRIAL 
VERTEBRATE  SPECIES  COMMON  TO  ALL 
ACTION  ALTERNATIVES 


Sensitve  terrestrial  vertebrate  species  that  are 
known  to  exist  or  whose  habitat  exists  in  the 
project  area  are  listed  below  with  a short  descrip- 
tion of  the  potential  effects  of  the  proposed  action 
alternatives  on  the  species  and/or  its  habitat. 


Northern  Goshawk  {AcipHer  gentilis):  Northern 
goshawks  require  dense  mature  to  old  growth  co- 
nifer, mixed  conifer/aspen  or  aspen  stands  for 
nesting  in  the  Rocky  Mountain  region  (Shuster 
1 980).  Nests  are  commonly  located  at  least  30  feet 
above  the  ground  in  forested  areas  with  a closed 
canopy  and  little  or  no  understory,  and  are  often 
adjacent  to  open  water.  Nests  are  often  used  for 
several  seasons  (Call,  1978). 

Suitable  nesting  habitat  in  the  form  of  mature  to 
overmature  conifer  or  mixed  conifer/aspen  stands 
is  apparently  the  most  significant  limiting  factor  for 
this  species.  Any  removal  of  mature  conifer 
stands,  particularly  Douglas-fir,  with  an  average 
diameter  of  8 inches  or  greater,  canopy  closure  of 
40  percent  or  greater  and  at  least  25  acres  in  size 
reduces  the  available  nesting  habitat  for  Northern 
goshawks. 

For  Analysis  Area  I,  approximately  1,750  acres  of 
this  preferred  habitat  is  currently  present.  The  vari- 
ous action  alternatives  in  this  proposal  would  re- 
move from  13  to  18  percent  of  this  habitat.  This 
could  possibly  affect  one  or  more  stands  used  as 
nest  sites.  However,  preferred  habitat  would  still 
be  available  throughout  the  area  and  actual  abun- 
dance, distribution  and/or  species  viability  would 
not  be  affected. 

Analysis  Area  II  contains  approximately  3,550 
acres  of  old  growth  conifer  habitat.  However,  this 
area  is  primarily  covered  by  lodgepole  pine  and 
subalpine  fir,  and  thus  is  much  less  preferred 
goshawk  nesting  habitat.  From  8 to  1 5 percent  of 
this  habitat  would  be  removed  by  the  various  ac- 
tion alternatives  in  this  area.  These  alternatives 
should  therefore  not  adversely  affect  goshawk  dis- 
tribution or  abundance.  Openings  created  in  this 
densely  forested  area  should  increase  diversity 
and  abundance  of  prey  species. 

These  two  areas  have  not  sustained  previous  tim- 
ber harvest  activities.  Consequently,  goshawk 
nesting  habitat  is  currently  available  in  pristine  or 
natural  quantity.  The  one  nest  site  known  to  be 
present,  in  Analysis  Area  I,  will  not  be  disturbed  by 
any  of  the  currently  proposed  action  alternatives. 
If  additional  nest  sites  are  located  before  or  during 
the  proposed  sale  activities,  mitigation  measures 
outlined  in  the  Forest  Plan  direction  would  be  fol- 
lowed. These  mitigations  restrict  timber  harvesting 
and  other  human  disturbance  in  a buffer  zone  with 


IV -44 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


a 1/2  mile  radius  around  an  occupied  nest  (Forest 
Plan,  IV-20). 

American  lynx  ( Felis  lynx  canadensis ):  Lynx  de- 
pend very  heavily  upon  snowshoe  hare  as  their 
principal  food  source.  In  this  analysis  area,  snow- 
shoe  hare  and  thus  lynx  are  most  commonly  found 
in  the  spruce/subalpine  fir  forests  where  shrubby 
riparian  zones  and/or  openings  occur.  These  ar- 
eas provide  both  good  conifer  cover  and  browse 
for  hares.  Consequently,  any  irregular  pattern  of 
logging  and/or  fire  in  high  elevation  forests  usually 
provides  prime  hare  and  lynx  habitat.  Therefore, 
timber  harvest  activity  as  proposed  in  any  of  the 
Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  action  alternatives  should 
actually  have  a positive  effect  on  lynx  (and  snow- 
shoe  hare)  populations,  particularly  in  Area  II. 

Wolverine  (Gulo  gulo ):  The  large  home  range 
size,  low  population  density  and  non-selective 
feeding  nature  of  this  species  makes  it  fairly  un- 
susceptible to  site-specific  disturbances  such  as 
timber  harvest  activities.  This  is  especially  true 
since  primary  wolverine  habitat  occurs  at  eleva- 
tions above  most  commercial  forest  sites  on  this 
Forest  and  in  this  analysis  area.  Also,  since  new 
roads  would  be  closed  after  the  proposed  sales, 
human  presence  would  not  be  significantly  differ- 
ent from  the  current  situation.  For  these  reason, 
this  proposed  action  is  not  expected  to  affect 
possible  wolverine  presence  and/or  habitat. 

Western  or  Townsend’s  big-eared  bat  (Plecotus 
townsendii ):  Caves,  abandoned  mine  tunnels 
and  deserted  buildings  are  known  to  be  used  by 
nursery  colonies  and  for  hibernaculum  sites  by  the 
Western  big-eared  bat.  None  of  these  factors  are 
known  to  exist  within  this  analysis  area.  Therefore 
none  of  the  proposed  action  alternatives  are  ex- 
pected to  have  any  direct  or  indirect  effects  on  this 
species. 

Boreal  owl  {Aegolius  funereus):  In  this  analysis 
area,  none  of  Area  I (the  lower  elevation  portion) 
and  less  than  1 .4  percent  of  Area  II  (the  higher 
elevation  portion)  that  would  be  harvested  is  within 
cover  types  that  may  provide  suitable  nesting 
habitat  for  boreal  owls.  Since  boreal  owls  actually 
utilize  edges  for  feeding  and  since  this  proposal 
only  affects  a small  percentage  of  the  total  area, 
any  effects  precipitated  by  an  action  alternative 
would  have  a minimal  effect  on  boreal  owl  habitat 
suitability. 


Northern  three-toed  woodpecker  (Picoides  tri- 
dactylus):  Alternatives  under  this  proposal  are  pri- 
marily confined  to  elevations  below  the  preferred 
habitats  of  this  species.  The  magnitude  of  affected 
suitable  habitat  would  be  similar  to  those  for  boreal 
owl.  Consequently,  no  effects  on  this  species 
would  be  predicted. 

Great  gray  owl  ( Strix  nebulosa ):  Great  gray  owls 
use  open  forests  and  openings  for  preferred  feed- 
ing sites  and  prefer  platform  nest  sites.  These  fac- 
tors make  this  species  relatively  unsusceptible  to 
effects  due  to  the  proposed  action  alternatives, 
and,  in  fact,  the  harvest  openings  would  contribute 
to  the  preferred  feeding  sites  until  obscured  by 
regeneration. 

Spotted  frog  {Rana  pretiosa):  The  proposed  ac- 
tion is  not  expected  to  have  any  effect  upon  spot- 
ted frogs  because  the  only  crossing  on  Woodtick 
Creek,  the  sole  stream  in  the  analysis  area  that 
may  harbor  them,  would  be  an  open  bottom  cul- 
vert. In  addition,  there  are  no  proposed  harvest 
units  closer  than  approximately  0.3  of  a mile  to  this 
stream  and  most  are  further  than  0.5  mile  from  it. 

Alternative  1 - No  Action 

Under  the  no  action  alternative,  no  adverse  effects 
to  sensitive  wildlife  species  or  to  their  habitat 
would  occur  as  a result  of  proposed  activities. 
However,  the  possible  benefits  to  American  lynx 
and  great  gray  owl  habitat  would  not  occur,  and 
the  risk  of  a large  wildfire  that  may  affect  these 
species’  habitat  would  not  be  lowered. 


EFFECTS  TO  SENSITIVE  PLANT  SPECIES 
COMMON  TO  ALL  ACTION  ALTERNATIVES 

Of  the  12  species  on  the  current  Forest  Service 
Intermountain  Region  Sensitive  Plant  Species  list 
for  the  Salmon  National  Forest,  only  Lemhi  beard- 
tongue  may  occur  within  the  analysis  area. 

Lemhi  beardtongue  (Penstemon  lemhiensis): 
Recent  field  surveys  indicate  that  this  species  is 
quite  abundant  on  specific  sites  in  this  Forest.  It 
has  been  located  in  the  Panther  Creek  drainage, 
but  not  within  the  analysis  area.  Lemhi  beard- 
tongue  is  an  early  successional  species  that  read- 
ily colonizes  disturbed  sites  such  as  burned  areas 
and  road  cut  and  fill  slopes.  For  this  reason,  the 
activities  proposed  in  all  of  the  action  alternatives 


IV  - 45 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Safe  Fima!  EiS 


Chapter  IV 


are  not  expected  to  adversely  affect  this  species 
and,  if  it  is  present  but  not  detected,  it  would  likely 
benefit  from  the  proposed  activities. 

Given  the  habitat  types  that  the  Lemhi  beard- 
tongue  is  found  in  (meadow  and  sage  complexes), 
it  is  not  likely  that  any  of  the  harvest  units  are 
located  where  they  would  conflict  with  this  plant 
species.  It  is  possible  that  road  locations  occurring 
in  meadows  or  sagebrush  openings  would  affect 
this  species.  Site-specific  surveys  would  be  com- 
pleted before  activities  take  place,  and  if  Lemhi 
beardtongue  is  discovered,  roads  would  be  relo- 
cated around  the  plants. 

Alternative  1 - No  Action 

Under  the  no  action  alternative,  no  adverse  effects 
to  sensitive  plants  would  occur  as  a result  of  timber 
harvesting.  However,  the  possible  spread  of  Lemhi 
beardtongue  to  disturbed  sites  created  by  road 
construction  and  timber  harvesting  would  not  take 
place. 

CONSISTENCY  WITH  FOREST  PLAN 
STANDARDS  AND  GUIDELINES 

All  action  alternatives  are  consistent  with  Forest 
Plan  standards  and  guidelines  for  management  of 
threatened,  endangered  and  sensitive  species. 


EFFECTS  TO  ROADLESS  RESOURCES 


The  construction  of  roads  and  the  harvest  of  trees 
have  an  irreversible  and  irretrievable  effect  when 
the  activity  occurs  on  an  area  that  was  formerly 
roadless.  These  activities,  by  their  ground  and 
vegetative  disturbance,  have  a direct  effect  on  the 
physical,  biological  and  social  attributes  of  an 
area.  Indirectly,  the  character  is  changed  because 
sights  and  sounds  of  human  activities  are  appar- 
ent from  adjacent  ground,  undisturbed  islands  be- 
come isolated  from  the  larger  undeveloped  area 
by  linear  pockets  of  development,  and  access  into 
an  area  is  facilitated.  The  effect  these  activities 
have  on  a roadless  area  make  it  unlikely  that 
Congress  would  further  consider  that  portion  of 
the  roadless  area  underlying  the  analysis  area  for 
inclusion  into  the  National  Wilderness  Preserva- 
tion System  (NWPS). 


Analysis  of  the  effects  of  the  various  alternatives  on 
the  roadless  resource  as  done  by  plotting  the  pro- 
posed harvest  and  road  building  activity  on  a map 
of  the  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area  (Figure  111-4). 
Acres  of  disturbance  and  total  roadless  acres  af- 
fected by  the  disturbance  were  determined.  Ef- 
fects on  the  special  areas  and  wilderness 
attributes  of  the  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area, 
as  described  in  Chapter  III,  were  addressed  quali- 
tatively. 


EFFECTS  COMMON  TO  ALL  ACTION 
ALTERNATIVES 

All  action  alternatives,  except  Alternative  5,  pro- 
pose some  combination  of  timber  harvest  and 
road  construction  within  the  boundaries  of  the 
identified  roadless  area.  Alternative  5 proposes  4 
harvest  units  within  the  roadless  area  but  no  road 
construction.  Irreversible  and/or  irretrievable  ef- 
fects would  occur  if  any  of  the  action  alternatives 
are  implemented.  Alternatives  vary  in  their  magni- 
tude and  in  the  location  of  effect.  However,  since 
the  same  general  areas  are  being  entered  in  all 
action  alternatives  except  alternative  5,  the  road- 
less acres  affected  is  the  same  for  alternatives  2, 
3,  4,  6 and  2A.  The  amount  for  these  alternatives 
is  approximately  9,920  acres  or  about  16  percent 
of  the  total  acreage  of  the  Taylor  Mountain  Road- 
less Area.  Alternative  5 would  affect  approximately 
208  acres  or  less  than  one-half  of  one  percent  of 
the  total  acreage  of  the  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless 
Area. 

The  effects  of  all  action  alternatives  are  summa- 
rized in  Table  IV-9.  Because  the  differences  be- 
tween the  effects  due  to  each  individual  alternative 
are  so  small,  discussion  of  each  alternative  is  not 
warranted. 

None  of  the  action  alternatives  have  effects  on  any 
of  the  special  places  identified  in  Chapter  III,  nor 
do  they  affect  the  ability  to  identify  logical  and 
manageable  boundaries  for  the  remainder  of  the 
roadless  area. 

All  of  the  action  alternatives  would  adversely  affect 
natural  integrity  within  the  specific  disturbance  ar- 
eas (roads  and  harvest  units).  Natural  integrity  in 
the  remainder  of  the  roadless  area  would  not  be 
affected. 


IV -46 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  SV 


All  of  the  action  alternatives  would  diminish  the 
apparent  naturalness  within  the  disturbance  ar- 
eas. Visitors  would  have  no  question  that  they  are 
encountering  an  area  that  has  been  brought  under 
management  versus  a natural  condition.  Apparent 
naturalness  of  the  remainder  of  the  roadless  area 
would  remain  high. 

None  of  the  action  alternatives  would  affect  a visi- 
tor’s ability  to  engage  in  primitive  recreation  activi- 
ties, either  in  the  disturbance  areas  or  the  remain- 
der of  the  roadless  area. 

All  of  the  action  alternatives  would  adversely  affect 
the  feelings  of  solitude  and  self-reliance  within  the 
disturbance  areas.  Opportunities  for  solitude 
would  not  be  affected  in  the  remainder  of  the  road- 
less area. 

None  of  the  action  alternatives  would  affect  oppor- 
tunities for  challenging  experiences,  either  within 
the  disturbance  areas,  or  in  the  remainder  of  the 
roadless  area. 

All  of  the  action  alternatives  would  cause  a tempo- 
rary noise  impact  within  the  9,920  acre  affected 
area  from  the  sounds  of  logging  activity  and  road 
construction.  This  impact  would  last  approxi- 
mately three  years  and  would  vary  in  intensity  and 


duration.  The  remainder  of  the  roadless  area 
would  not  be  affected. 

Some  public  comments  received  during  the  com- 
ment period  expressed  opposition  to  any  entry 
within  roadless  area  boundaries.  The  No  Action 
alternative  examines  the  option  of  retaining  the 
opportunity  for  future  wilderness  designation  for 
the  entire  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area  with  no 
roadless  entry.  Action  alternatives  in  this  proposal 
explore  different  levels  of  opportunity  to  implement 
the  Forest  Plan.  All  of  the  action  alternatives  would 
leave  the  roadless  area  with  sufficient  acreage 
(generally  5,000  acres)  to  be  considered  for  inclu- 
sion in  the  NWPS.  Within  this  remaining  84  percent 
(53,300  acres)  of  the  roadless  area,  the  sights, 
sounds  and  natural  integrity  would  be  maintained, 
and  the  feelings  of  serenity  and  “wildness"  could 
be  experienced  to  the  same  degree  as  the 
present. 

Alternative  1 = No  Action 

Alternative  1 would  maintain  the  current  condition 
of  the  roadless  resource  in  the  designated  road- 
less area.  There  would  be  no  direct,  indirect,  or 
cumulative  effect  on  the  roadless  resource.  The 
opportunity  for  Congress  to  consider  the  entire 
area  for  Wilderness  inclusion  in  the  NWPS  would 
be  retained. 


TABLE  IV-9:  EFFECTS  ON  THE  ROADLESS  RESOURCE  BY  ALTERNATIVE 


Alternative 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

© 

2A 

PRE- 

FERRED 

Total  road  miles 

0 

16.8 

14.6 

17.8 

0 

17.8 

16.8 

Total  road  acres 

0 

101.8 

88.5 

107.9 

0 

107.9 

101.8 

Proposed  harvest 

0 

568.0 

440.0 

763.0 

208.0 

731.0 

560.0 

acres 

Total  roadless 

0 

9,920 

9,920 

9,920 

208 

9,920 

9,920 

acres  affected 

Percent  of  roadless 

0 

16 

16 

16 

<1 

16 

16 

area  affected 
Acs  of  roadless 
area  remaining 

63,220 

53,300 

53,300 

53,300 

63,012 

53,300 

53,300 

CUMULATIVE  EFFECTS 

Reasonably  foreseeable  actions  common  to  all  ac- 
tion alternatives  include  thinning  within  the  pro- 
posed harvest  units  and  salvage  of  post  and  pole 


material,  firewood  and  house  logs.  The  effects  of 
these  operations  on  the  roadless  resource  would 
be  the  same  as  the  effects  of  the  action  alterna- 
tives. No  permanent  roads  would  be  built  to  ac- 
cess post  and  pole  sales,  and  the  effects  of  the 


IV  - 47 


Moyer  Saif  Timber  Sale  Final  ESS 


Chapter  IV 


harvest  would  be  incidental  compared  to  the  tim- 
ber harvest  associated  with  the  alternative  itself. 

In  addition  to  the  Moyer  Salt  and  Salt  Creek  Timber 
Sale,  two  other  timber  sales  are  also  being  consid- 
ered within  the  boundary  of  the  Taylor  Mountain 
Roadless  Area  within  the. reasonably  foreseeable 
future.  The  Park  Creek  Timber  Sale  would  be  on 
the  Salmon  Ranger  District  of  the  Salmon  National 
Forest  and  the  Opal  Creek  Timber  Sale  would  be 
on  the  Cobalt  Ranger  District  of  the  Salmon  Na- 
tional Forest. 

The  Park  Creek  Timber  Sale  on  the  Salmon 
Ranger  District  of  the  Salmon  National  Forest  is 
planned  to  take  place  in  1 998  and  would  affect  the 
southeast  tip  of  the  roadless  area.  Road  construc- 
tion that  is  part  of  the  proposed  action  would  pene- 
trate approximately  two  miles  into  the  boundary  of 
the  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area.  Total  direct 
disturbance  is  tentatively  planned  as  3 miles  of 
road  construction  and  172  acres  of  harvest  con- 
tained in  9 cutting  units.  This  would  result  in  ap- 
proximately 1 ,920  additional  roadless  acres  affect- 
ed (Personal  communication,  Salmon  Ranger 
District  Timber  Forester,  July,  August,  1991). 

The  Opal  Creek  Timber  Sale  on  the  Cobalt  Ranger 
District  of  the  Salmon  National  Forest  is  planned  to 
take  place  in  the  mid  to  late  1990’s  and  would 
affect  the  southwest  edge  of  the  roadless  area. 
This  proposed  sale  also  proposes  road  construc- 
tion that  would  penetrate  one  to  two  miles  into  the 
Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area.  Total  direct  dis- 
turbance is  tentatively  planned  as  1 to  2 miles  of 
road  construction  and  165  acres  of  harvest.  This 
would  result  in  approximately  640  additional  road- 
less acres  affected  (Personal  communication, 
Cobalt  Ranger  District  Timber  Forester,  July,  Au- 
gust, 1991). 

These  sales  would  only  affect  the  edges  of  the 
roadless  area,  and  most  likely  would  not  be  con- 
sidered major  intrusions.  Neither  one  would  pre- 
clude the  remainder  of  the  area  from  being  consid- 
ered for  inclusion  in  the  NWPS. 

CONSISTENCY  WITH  FOREST  PLAN 
STANDARDS  AND  GUIDELINES 

All  action  alternatives  are  consistent  with  Forest 
Plan  standards  and  guidelines  for  management  of 
the  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area. 


VISUAL  EFFECTS 


Timber  harvest  and  road  building  can  affect  the 
visual  resource  by  altering  the  existing  form,  color, 
line  and  texture  in  a given  view  area  or  "viewshed." 
If  the  extent  of  the  activities  are  great  enough, 
Visual  Quality  Objectives  (VQO’s)  may  be  affected. 
Visual  effects  of  the  change  depend  on  the  interac- 
tion of  five  factors:  1)  Access  to  timber  stands  by 
roads  and  skid  trails,  2)  harvest  methods  and  silvi- 
cultural systems,  3)  slash  disposal  methods,  4) 
design,  shape  and  grouping  of  harvest  units,  and 
5)  topographic  relation  to  the  viewer’s  position. 

The  analysis  for  visual  quality  was  conducted  by 
applying  the  standard  Visual  Management  System 
inventory  procedures.  The  inventory  identifies  Vi- 
sual Quality  Objectives  to  be  applied  to  the  project 
area.  Basically,  the  VQQ’s  determine  which  por- 
tions of  the  landscape  would  be  visible  to  viewers 
using  sensitive  travel  routes,  and  how  to  protect 
the  seen  areas  from  undesirable  development  ef- 
fects depending  on  their  location  to  the  viewer. 

EFFECTS  COMMON  TO  ALL  ACTION 
ALTERNATIVES 

There  would  be  change  apparent  in  the  visual  re- 
source from  various  points  along  the  sensitive  trav- 
el routes  identified  in  Chapter  III.  Generally,  the 
visual  variety  of  the  landscape  would  change, 
making  management  activities  more  evident  as  ar- 
eas would  be  harvested  and  roads  would  be  built. 

When  harvest  units  appear  in  the  foreground  the 
visual  resource  would  change  considerably.  A typ- 
ical harvest  unit  would  have  areas  of  bare  ground 
with  much  of  the  remaining  area  covered  by  slash. 
After  disposal,  the  slash  would  be  blackened  from 
fire,  or  piled.  Recovery  would  take  place  as  the 
ground  cover  re-establishes  and  seedlings  be- 
come established  and  grow,  with  the  scene 
changing  as  the  new  stand  of  trees  gains  added 
height  over  a number  of  decades. 

When  harvest  units  appear  in  the  middle  ground  or 
background,  the  visual  resource  would  change  on 
a much  larger  scale,  with  the  overall  pattern,  shape 
and  size  of  openings  and  the  introduction  of  hori- 
zontal road  scars  the  predominant  feature. 


IV -48 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


EFFECTS  BY  ALTERNATIVE 

Alternative  1 - No  Action 

Alternative  1 would  permit  the  continued  evolution 
of  the  vegetative  component  of  the  landscape.  Fire 
suppression  efforts  would  continue,  changing  the 
condition  of  the  forest  from  that  which  would  occur 
naturally.  The  visual  environment  would  slowly 
change  as  the  stages  of  vegetation  establishment 
proceed  through  their  cycles.  The  viewshed 
throughout  the  project  area  would  continue  to 
meet  Forest  Plan  VQO’s. 

Alternative  2 

This  alternative  would  have  the  second  greatest 
effect  on  the  visual  resource  after  Alternative  4. 
Harvest  units  and  constructed  roads  would  be  visi- 
ble from  major  travel  routes  in  the  area.  However, 
techniques  such  as  irregular  edges  on  the  harvest 
units  would  be  employed  to  lessen  the  effects  on 
the  scenery.  Overall,  this  alternative  would  meet 
the  assigned  VQO’s  of  Partial  Retention  and  Modi- 
fication. 

Alternative  3 

This  alternative  would  have  the  second  least  ad- 
verse effect  of  the  action  alternatives  on  the  visual 
resource,  primarily  due  to  the  fact  that  it  contains 
lesser  amounts  of  ground  disturbing  activity.  Har- 
vest units  would  still  be  visible,  but  would  remain 
visually  subordinate  to  the  characteristic  land- 
scape, and  the  VQO’s  of  Partial  Retention  and 
Modification  would  be  met. 

Alternative  4 

This  alternative  would  have  the  greatest  adverse 
effect  on  the  visual  resource  as  it  would  cause 
more  change  than  the  other  action  alternatives. 
Clearcut  harvest  units,  large  shelterwood  units 
and  roads  would  be  visible  from  the  major  view- 
points and  the  existing  visual  experience  would 
not  be  maintained.  Openings  in  the  forest  canopy 
would  be  evident,  as  would  road  corridors,  primar- 
ily in  the  background.  These  openings  would  ex- 
ceed the  Forest  Plan  standards  and  guidelines  by 
as  much  as  two  to  four  fold  (30  to  60  acre  range 
versus  recommended  15  acre  clearcuts  in  back- 
ground Partial  Retention). 


The  management  activities  would  result  in  an 
achieved  VQO  of  Modification,  instead  of  the  as- 
signed VQO  of  Partial  Retention,  for  harvest  units 
4W,  22,  S6,  SI  2 and  Si  3.  The  activities  would  be 
highly  evident  and  dominate  the  scene,  rather 
than  remain  visually  subordinate  to  the  character- 
istic landscape,  and  not  be  highly  evident  to  the 
casual  visitor. 

Alternative  5 

This  alternative  would  not  have  a significant  effect 
on  the  visual  resource  due  to  the  small  number  of 
acres  being  treated  overall  and  the  minimal 
amount  of  road  construction  proposed.  Overall, 
this  alternative  would  meet  the  assigned  VQO’s  of 
partial  retention  and  modification. 

Alternative  6 PREFERRED 

This  alternative  has  incorporated  two  additional 
design  features  over  Alternative  4 that  will  substan- 
tially reduce  visual  impacts.  The  first  is  a reduction 
in  the  size  of  the  visible  units  that  were  indicated  as 
a problem  in  Alternative  4.  Second,  will  be  the 
application  of  leave  islands  in  16  of  the  26  pro- 
posed clearcuts.  Overall,  this  alternative  would 
meet  the  assigned  VQO’s  of  partial  retention  and 
modification. 

Alternative  2A 

This  alternative  should  have  the  least  overall  effect 
on  the  visual  resource  of  all  the  action  alternatives. 
The  leave  island  concept  would  be  used  in  24  of 
the  26  proposed  clearcuts,  as  well  as  a much 
greater  effort  to  protect  and  save  residual  under- 
story, both  of  which  will  contribute  substantially  to 
maintaining  a forested  appearance.  This  alterna- 
tive would  meet  the  assigned  VQQ’s  of  partial  re- 
tention and  modification. 

CUMULATIVE  EFFECTS 

There  are  no  planned  or  foreseeable  surface  dis- 
turbing activities  within  the  analysis  area  for  the 
remainder  of  the  current  planning  period,  which 
extends  through  1998.  The  only  timber  harvest 
activities  planned  within  the  analysis  area  are  tim- 
ber stand  improvements  (such  as  thinning)  within 
the  proposed  cutting  units,  and  firewood  and  post 
and  pole  salvage.  No  additional  roads  are  planned 
for  construction  for  the  thinning  or  salvage  activi- 
ties. 


IV -49 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  ESS 


Chapter  IV 


There  would  be  no  additional  adverse  effects  to 
the  visual  resource  from  these  activities.  In  fact, 
scheduled  thinning  would  encourage  more  rapid 
growth  of  remaining  trees  and  new  trees  that  grow 
on  the  site,  thereby  hastening  the  recovery  of  visu- 
al effects. 


CONSISTENCY  WITH  FOREST  PLAIN] 
STANDARDS  AND  GUIDELINES 

Alternative  4 would  not  meet  the  VQO’s  assigned 
in  the  Forest  Plan  for  this  portion  of  the  Forest.  This 
alternative  would  result  in  an  achieved  VQO  of 
Modification,  rather  than  Partial  Retention,  for  five 
of  the  harvest  units.  Alternatives  1 , 2,  3,  5,  6,  and 
2A  would  meet  all  assigned  VQO’s,  if  proposed 
visual  resource  mitigation  measures  are  imple- 
mented. 


RECREATION  EFFECTS 


Timber  harvesting  and  Its  associated  activities 
could  affect  the  recreation  resource  in  the  follow- 
ing manner: 

1.  Road  building  and  tree  removal  affect  the 
physical  and  visual  quality  experienced  on 
a recreational  trail.  The  strongest  effect  is 
generally  created  in  the  foreground.  For  ex- 
ample, a clearcut  located  alongside  or  over- 
lapping a trail  would  have  the  greatest  im- 
mediate effect  on  the  quality  of  the  time 
spent  on  that  trail  by  a horserider,  back- 
packer, trailbiker,  etc.  The  close-up  pres- 
ence of  roads,  stumps,  slash  piles,  man- 
made openings,  etc.,  is  acknowledged  to 
have  a greater  effect  than  a middle  ground 
or  background  harvest  unit  or  road. 

The  timber  harvest  units  were  examined  in 
relation  to  Trail  #6204,  Moyer  Peak  jeep 
trail.  The  linear  distance  of  direct  interface 
or  overlap  of  a proposed  road  or  cutting  unit 
with  this  trail  was  then  calculated.  A cutting 
unit  located  in  the  middle  ground  or  back- 
ground viewshed  from  the  trail  was  consid- 
ered to  have  no  effect. 

2.  Access  opportunities  can  be  changed  (ei- 
ther created  or  removed)  by  logging  activi- 


ties. New  road  construction  affords  the  hik- 
er, horse  rider,  trailbiker,  hunter  or 
camper-trailer  owner  a different  way  to  get 
to  a trail,  access  a stream  or  camping  spot, 
or  get  closer  to  better  big  game  habitat. 
These  opportunities  are  difficult  to  quantify. 
They  were  measured  in  this  analysis  in 
qualitative  terms,  i.e.,  relative  increase  or 
decrease. 

3.  Direct  conflict  between  a recreational  activ- 
ity and  logging  can  occur.  In  the  Moyer 
Creek  area,  this  would  take  the  form  of  fall 
logging  operations  preventing  the  use  of 
the  area  by  big  game  hunters.  The  opera- 
tion of  heavy  equipment  and  hauling  on 
roads  could  disturb  game  movement  and 
location  patterns  rendering  the  area  unsuit- 
able for  a quality  hunt.  In  the  long-term, 
however,  access  to  the  area  would  be  im- 
proved and  more  hunting  would  occur. 

4.  The  construction  of  roads  and  harvesting  of 
trees  can  result  in  the  conversion  of  acres 
within  the  Recreation  Opportunity  Spec- 
trum. In  this  case,  the  development  activi- 
ties would  result  in  conversion  from  Semi- 
Primitive  Motorized  and  Semi-Primitive 
Nonmotorized  to  Roaded-Natural  Appear- 
ing. 


EFFECTS  COMMON  TO  ALL  ACTION 
ALTERNATIVES 

None  of  the  action  alternatives  would  have  a direct 
impact  on  users  of  the  Moyer  Peak  jeep  trail  (trail 
#6204)  since  proposed  harvest  units  are  located 
in  the  middle  ground  and  background  view  from 
this  trail.  However,  all  action  alternatives,  except 
Alternative  5,  would  result  in  a one  half  mile  reduc- 
tion of  historic  vehicle  access  when  a spur  road  off 
of  the  Moyer  Peak  jeep  trail  is  closed. 

If  fall  logging  operations  were  to  occur,  it  would 
likely  affect  the  quality  of  big  game  hunting  oppor- 
tunities in  the  immediate  area  of  the  activity.  The 
period  of  displacement  of  hunters  would  likely  not 
exceed  three  years. 

All  action  alternatives  will  increase  the  use  of  hu- 
man access  into  the  area,  increase  the  vulnerabil- 
ity of  hunted  species  and  decrease  habitat  secu- 
rity for  both  hunted  and  non-hunted  species.  This 


IV  - 50 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


would  contribute  to  the  continuous  erosion  of  the 
habitat  base  for  hunted  species  and  the  need  for 
more  restrictive  hunting  season  regulations  such 
as  a shorter  season  and  thus  the  loss  of  consump- 
tive recreational  opportunities. 


EFFECTS  BY  ALTERNATIVE 

Alternative  1 - N©  Action 

Alternative  1 would  have  no  adverse  effect  on  cur- 
rent recreation  activities  and  use  patterns.  Overall, 
the  quality  of  the  recreation  setting  would  remain 
high. 

Alternative  2 

Alternative  2 would  have  the  second  most  adverse 
effects  on  recreation  after  Alternative  4 in  terms  of 
effects  on  the  physical  and  visual  quality  of  the 
area  due  to  timber  harvesting  and  road  construc- 
tion. 

It  would  convert  approximately  6,990  acres  from 
Semi-Primitive  Motorized  and  Nonmotorized  to 
Roaded-Natural  Appearing.  Overall,  the  quality  of 
the  recreation  setting  would  remain  high. 

Alternative  3 

Alternative  3 would  have  the  second  least  adverse 
effects  on  recreation  of  the  action  alternatives  in 
terms  of  impacts  to  the  physical  and  visual  quality 
of  the  area  by  proposed  project  activities. 

It  would  convert  approximately  6,31 0 acres  from 
Semi-Primitive  Motorized  and  Nonmotorized  to 
Roaded-Natural  Appearing.  Overall,  the  quality  of 
the  recreation  setting  would  remain  high. 

Alternative  4 

Alternative  4 would  have  the  most  adverse  effects 
on  recreation.  The  quality  of  the  setting  would  di- 
minish from  an  aesthetic  standpoint  in  the  vicinity 
of  the  management  activities. 

Alternative  4 would  convert  approximately  6,990 
acres  from  Semi-Primitive  Motorized  and  Nonmo- 


torized to  Roaded-Natural  Appearing.  Overall,  the 
quality  of  the  recreation  setting  would  remain  high. 

Alternative  5 

Alternative  5 would  have  the  least  adverse  effects 
on  recreation  of  the  action  alternatives  in  terms  of 
impacts  to  the  physical  and  visual  quality  of  the 
area  by  proposed  project  activities. 

Since  no  new  roads  would  be  constructed  into  the 
current  semi-primitive  areas,  there  would  be  no 
conversion  of  acres  from  the  semi-primitive  motor- 
ized and  nonmotorized  to  roaded-natural  appear- 
ing. Overall,  the  quality  of  the  recreation  setting 
would  remain  high. 

Alternative  6 PREFERRED 

Same  as  alternative  4 with  improvement  from  an 
aesthetic  standpoint. 

Alternative  2A 

Same  as  alternative  2 with  improvement  from  an 
aesthetic  standpoint. 

CONSISTENCY  WITH  FOREST  PLAN 
STANDARDS  AND  GUIDELINES 

All  of  the  action  alternatives  would  generally  meet 
the  desired  future  condition  of  maintaining  the  cur- 
rent high  quality  of  dispersed  recreation  settings, 
although  Alternative  4 would  result  in  some  lessen- 
ing of  the  desired  visual  quality  of  the  area. 


EFFECTS  TO  AIR  QUALITY 


Prescribed  burning,  dust,  vehicle  emissions,  and 
wildfire  could  temporarily  degrade  air  quality  in  the 
analysis  area  and  surrounding  airshed.  The  small 
local  communities  of  Elk  Bend  and  Salmon,  Idaho, 
about  13  and  25  miles  southeast  and  northeast  of 
the  analysis  area,  respectively,  could  be  inconven- 
ienced by  smoky  conditions  for  short  periods.  In 
case  of  a major  wildfire,  smoky  conditions  could 
persist  in  the  Lemhi  Valley  and  parts  of  the  Salmon 
River  drainage  airshed  for  several  weeks,  depend- 
ing on  local  climate  conditions,  especially  wind 
direction. 


IV-  51 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sal®  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


Prescribed  Burning 

Slash  treatment  by  burning  would  be  prescribed 
for  atl  action  alternatives  for  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber 
sale.  Slash  would  be  either  piled  and  burned  (in 
either  windrows  or  piles)  or  broadcast  burned,  de- 
pending on  the  harvest  system  used  and  the  slope 
of  the  site.  These  fires  would  produce  isolated  and 
short-term  degradation  of  air  quality;  the  intensity 
of  the  effect  would  depend  on  weather  conditions 
during  and  immediately  following  burning.  Howev- 
er, in  the  long  term,  state  and  federal  air  quality 
standards  would  be  met  for  all  alternatives. 

Before  the  timber  sale  would  be  harvested,  fuels 
specialists  would  prepare  prescribed  bum  plans 
that  would  specifically  address  the  conditions  on 
each  cutting  unit.  Burning  would  be  conducted 
under  favorable  atmospheric  and  fuel-moisture 
conditions.  At  least  1 0 to  15  tons  of  large  woody 
material  would  be  retained  for  soil  productivity, 
wildlife,  and  site  protection,  and  would  also  reduce 
smoke  emissions  (compared  to  intense  wildfire). 
Most  burning  would  occur  at  elevations  above  and 
away  from  populated  areas  and  under  conditions 
that  provide  for  excellent,  good  or  fair  smoke  dis- 
persal. The  burn  prescriptions  would  comply  with 
State  of  Idaho  Air  Quality  Regualtions. 

Dust  and  Vehicle  Emissions 

Dust  and  vehicle  emissions  would  temporarily  re- 
duce air  quality  in  the  immediate  sale  vicinity.  All 
action  alternatives  would  require  the  application  of 
water  to  roads  as  needed  to  reduce  dust.  The 
amount  of  vehicle  emissions  would  depend  on  the 
amount  of  timber  harvested  and  the  number  of 
logging  trucks  required  to  haul  logs.  Impacts  relat- 
ed to  dust  and  vehicle  emissions  would  be  short- 
term and  temporary  in  nature. 


EFFECTS  BY  ALTERNATIVE 

Alternative  1 - No  Action 

Under  the  no  action  alternative,  no  timber  harvest- 
ing would  occur  and  therefore  no  slash  burning 
would  occur.  Effects  to  air  quality  due  to  wildfires 
may  be  indirectly  increased  because  the  high  po- 
tential for  wildfire  and  the  poor  access  to  the  area 


would  not  be  improved  through  timber  harvesting 
and  road  construction. 

With  no  timber  harvesting  there  would  be  no  in- 
creased impacts  due  to  dust  and  vehicle  emis- 
sions. Ongoing  dust  and  vehicle  emissions  due  to 
Forest  Service  vehicles  and  recreation  users 
would  still  occur  on  the  existing  road  network. 


EFFECTS  COMMON  TO  ALL  ACTION 
ALTERNATIVES 

The  estimated  increase  in  particulate  concentra- 
tion (PM-10)  was  calculated  for  each  alternative 
using  the  Simple  Approach  Smoke  Estimation 
Model  (SASEM)  developed  by  the  Bureau  of  Land 
Management  (Sestak  and  Riebau,  1988).  This 
model  calculates  total  suspended  particulate  con- 
centration (PM-10),  total  particulates  emitted 
(tons),  and  reduction  in  visual  range  due  to  smoke 
from  controlled  burns.  The  model  calculates  emis- 
sions from  data  on  the  size  of  the  burn,  burn  type 
(broadcast  or  pile),  burn  duration,  fire  line  inten- 
sity, average  fuel  loading,  and  the  type  of  fuel  that 
is  burned.  Average  fuel  loading  was  determined 
using  the  methods  of  Anderson  (1982).  For  the 
purposes  of  this  model  it  was  assumed  that  14 
tons  of  debris  would  remain  on  the  site  after  burn- 
ing, within  the  range  of  10  to  15  tons  per  acre 
specified  in  the  soils  mitigations  (listed  in  Chapter 
II).  The  airborne  particulate  concentrations  are  cal- 
culated from  the  emission  rate,  plume  rise,  wind 
speed  and  stability.  The  model  determines  the 
maximum  concentration  of  total  suspended  partic- 
ulates less  than  1 0 microns  in  size  (PM)  in  micro- 
grams per  cubic  meter  (ug/m3)  as  well  as  the  re- 
duction in  visual  range  at  selected  receptors. 

The  SASEM  model  calculated  the  estimated  out- 
put of  PM-1 0 in  ug/m3  for  each  of  the  action  alter- 
natives for  both  broadcast  burning  and  pile  and 
burn  methods  for  excellent,  good,  fair  and  poor 
dispersion  days  (excellent,  good,  fair  and  poor 
dispersion  days  are  determined  by  the  U.S. 
Weather  Bureau)  with  wind  speeds  between  2 and 
10  miles  per  hour.  Table  IV-1Q  shows  the  acres  of 
slash  burned  and  the  estimated  tons  of  total  partic- 
ulates emitted  calculated  by  the  SASEM  model  for 
each  of  the  alternatives;  the  PM-1 0 results  for  each 
alternative  have  been  removed  from  the  Appendix 
in  the  Final  but  are  available  for  review  in  the 
project  file. 


IV-  52 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


TABLE  IV-10:  ACRES  OF  SLASH  BURNED  AND  ESTIMATED  TOATL  PARTICULATES  EMITTED  (tons)  BY 

ALTERNATIVE 


Slash  Burn  Method 

Aft  1 

Alt  2 

Alt  3 

Alt  4 

Alt  5 

Alt  6 
PRE- 
FERRED 

Alt  2A 

Broadcast  Burn 
(acres) 

0 

110 

120 

100 

0 

100 

100 

Pile  and  Burn 
(#  piles) 

0 

12 

24 

44 

10 

36 

20 

Estimated  Total 
Particulates  (tons)* 

11.9 

11.4 

13.3 

1.1 

12.3 

10.6 

Broadcast  Burn 

0 

9.3 

10.1 

8.4 

0 

8.4 

8.4 

Pile  and  Burn 

0 

2.6 

1.3 

4.8 

1.1 

3.9 

2.2 

* for  excellent,  good  or  fair  dispersion  days  with  wind  speeds  between  2 and  1 0 mph 

CUMULATIVE  EFFECTS 


Under  excellent,  good  and  fair  dispersion  days  the 
estimated  PM-1 0 values  for  broadcast  burning  are 
below  the  PM-10  standard  of  150  ug/m3  estab- 
lished by  the  Clean  Air  Act  National  Ambient  Air 
Quality  Standards  (NAAQS).  Using  the  pile  and 
burn  slash  disposal  method,  Alternative  4,  which 
has  the  greatest  number  of  piles  (44),  exceeds  the 
National  standards  for  PM-10  on  excellent  disper- 
sion days  with  winds  between  2-6  mph;  good  dis- 
persion days  with  winds  between  5-10  mph;  fair 
dispersion  days  with  winds  between  7-10  mph, 
and  poor  dispersion  days  with  winds  between  2-5 
mph.  To  mitigate  these  impacts  the  piles  will  not  all 
be  burned  at  once,  but  will  be  staggered  over 
several  days  and  will  only  be  burned  when  air 
dispersion  quality  ratings  will  ensure  that  the 
PM-10  standards  are  not  exceeded  (see  Mitiga- 
tions section  of  Chapter  II).  In  addition,  conditions 
can  be  mitigated  to  meet  the  1 50  ug/m3  standard 
by  burning  under  favorable  fuel  moisture  and 
weather  conditions.  All  prescribed  burns  would  be 
monitored  for  smoke  dispersion  during  burning  to 
determine  if  they  follow  the  burn  plan,  meet 
SASEM  model  criteria,  and  do  not  violate  the 
Clean  Air  Act. 


The  smoke,  dust  and  vehicle  emissions  that  result 
from  implementation  of  the  action  alternatives 
would  combine  with  air  pollutants  from  other 
projects  in  the  local  area  such  as  other  timber  sale 
activities,  prescribed  burns,  any  mining  activities, 
and  recreational  use  of  the  area.  Some  short-term 
cumulative  effects  in  the  Lemhi  Valley  and  parts  of 
the  Salmon  River  drainage  may  occur. 


CONSISTENCY  WITH  FOREST  PLAN 
STANDARDS  AND  GUIDELINES 

All  action  alternatives  are  consistent  with  Forest 
Plan  standards  and  guidelines,  and  would  meet 
National  and  State  air  quality  standards. 


EFFECTS  TO  RANGE  RESOURCES 


Timber  harvest  and  associated  road  building  and 
other  activities  can  affect  the  range  resources  of 
an  area  in  several  ways.  The  openings  created  by 
logging  and  road  building  encourages  growth  of 
grasses,  providing  additional  forage  for  livestock 
for  1 5 to  20  years  after  initial  harvest.  However, 
utilization  of  this  forage  by  livestock  depends  on 
several  factors.  Cattle  will  not  make  much  use  of 


IV  - 53 


Moyer  SaBt  Timber  SaS®  FinaS  EIS 


Chapter  !V 


forage  that  is  very  far  from  water  or  is  growing  on 
very  steep  slopes.  Also,  large  amounts  of  slash 
and  cull  logs  near  roads  may  block  access  to  for- 
age growing  in  logged  units.  Silviculturalists  may 
deem  it  necessary  to  temporarily  fence  off  logged 
units  to  protect  conifer  seedlings  from  possible 
damage  by  livestock.  The  increase  in  forage  in  the 
harvested  areas  would  also  reduce  livestock  con- 
centration in  riparian  areas. 

New  roads  allow  cattle  to  travel  into  areas  not  pre- 
viously utilized.  This  provides  additional  forage  op- 
portunities for  cattle  and  would  change  the  live- 
stock distribution  pattern  within  each  allotment. 
Seeding  of  the  road  cuts  provides  a source  of 
forage  which  did  not  exist  before,  and  would  facili- 
tate cattle  movement  into  areas  not  previously 
used.  This  could  result  in  cattle  crossing  unit  and 
allotment  boundaries  where  natural  boundaries 
now  exist.  Cattle  guards,  gates,  fences  and  water 
developments  would  be  used  to  mitigate  these 
effects  for  the  action  alternatives  (see  Chapter  II, 
Table  18-1);  these  would  be  identified  during  devel- 
opment of  the  Knudsen  Vandenberg  Plan. 


EFFECTS  COMMON  TO  ALL  ACTION 
ALTERNATIVES 

None  of  the  seven  alternatives  would  have  a sub- 
stantive effect  on  the  range  resource.  The  greatest 
potential  for  effects  would  be  the  selection  of  Alter- 
native 4 and  6,  which  involves  the  most  road  con- 
struction and  timber  harvesting,  although  all  action 
alternatives  would  affect  the  range  resource  to  var- 
ious degrees. 

None  of  the  alternatives  would  have  a negative 
effect  on  current  grazing  capacity  in  any  of  these 
allotments. 

Alternative  1 = No  Action 

Under  the  no  action  alternative,  no  timber  harvest- 
ing and  road  construction  activities  would  occur. 
Increased  forage  that  results  from  timber  harvest- 
ing would  not  occur,  and  grazing  impacts  to 
riparian  areas  would  remain  high.  The  grazing  pat- 
terns and  livestock  distribution  would  remain  un- 
changed. 


CUMULATIVE  EFFECTS 

Within  the  foreseeable  future,  through  this  plan- 
ning period  (1998),  there  would  not  be  planned 
management  activities  that  would  affect  the  range 
resource  in  this  analysis  area. 

CONSISTENCY  WITH  FOREST  PLAN 
STANDARDS  AND  GUIDELINES 

All  alternatives  are  consistent  with  Forest  Plan 
standards  and  guidelines  for  range  management. 


EFFECTS  TO  TRANSPORTATION 
AND  ACCESS 


EFFECTS  COMMON  TO  ALL  ACTION 
ALTERNATIVES 

All  action  alternatives  proposed  in  this  EIS  would 
involve  construction  of  new  roads.  Alternatives  3, 
4,  5,  and  6 would,  in  addition,  involve  reconstruc- 
tion of  an  existing  road.  These  roads,  when  open, 
would  increase  access  to  large  tracts  of  land  that 
are  currently  inaccessible  by  motorized  vehicles 
and  that  are  only  accessed  with  difficulty  by  other 
means.  Improved  access  to  the  area  would  affect 
wildlife  habitat  security.  However,  these  roads 
would  be  gated  and  locked  except  during  timber 
harvesting,  periods  of  wood  salvage,  and  during 
stand  improvement  activities.  They  would  not  be 
routinely  used  for  motorized  recreation  purposes. 

As  part  of  the  wildlife  mitigations  that  would  be 
implemented  for  alt  action  alternatives  except  Al- 
ternative 5 (Chapter  II,  Table  11-1)  and  to  prevent 
access  to  the  proposed  new  road  system  via  the 
Moyer  Peak  Jeep  Trail,  construction  slash  will  be 
placed  on  the  road  prism  for  the  last  1/2  mile  of 
Road  # 60286.1  and  on  all  of  roads  60286.2, 
60286-C  and  60288.  This  construction  slash  will  be 
placed  on  the  road  prism  at  an  average  spacing  of 
1 50  feet  and  will  be  sufficiently  high  and  wide  to 
impede  foot  or  horse  traffic.  This  will  maintain  ac- 
cess to  an  area  that  has  traditionally  been  accessi- 
ble by  vehicles  (Moyer  Peak  Jeep  Trail)  but  will 
restrict  access  to  the  new  closed  road  system. 

An  additional  effect  to  the  analysis  area  that  would 
result  from  the  proposed  road  building  would  be 
the  increase  in  the  amount  of  commercial  timber- 


IV  - 54 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


land  available  for  harvest,  assuming  an  optimum 
skidding  distance  of  2,500  feet  for  tractor  skidding 
and  1,000  feet  for  cable  skidding.  There  are  at 
present  approximately  10,240  acres  of  suitable 
timberland  (areas  that  are  designated  as  suitable 
for  timber  harvesting  in  the  Forest  Plan;  see  Chap- 
ter III  for  a discussion  of  suitable  timberland)  within 
the  15,360-acre  analysis  area  Of  this  area,  ap- 
proximately 1 600  acres  of  timberland  are  presently 
accessible  for  timber  harvesting  with  the  existing 
road  system.  Table  IV-11  gives  the  acres  of  suit- 
able timberland  that  would  be  available  for  harvest 
for  each  action  alternative.  The  remaining  unhar- 
vested forest  would  be  more  easily  accessed  for 
timber  stand  improvement  activities.  Increased  ac- 
cess would  also  facilitate  fire  suppression  efforts. 


Alternative  1 - No  Action 

Under  the  no  action  alternative,,  no  new  roads 
would  be  constructed,  and  access  to  the  area  for 
timber  harvest,  hunting,  fire  fighting,  or  any  other 
purpose  would  remain  unchanged.  The  roadless 
attributes  of  the  area  would  remain  unchanged, 
and  the  Moyer  Jeep  trail  would  not  be  closed. 


CONSISTENCY  WITH  FOREST  PLAN 
STANDARDS  AND  GUIDELINES 

All  action  alternatives  are  consistent  with  Forest 
Plan  standards  and  guidelines  for  the  Forest  trans- 
portation system,  and  are  consistent  with  the  man- 
agement area  prescriptions  for  the  area. 


TABLE  IV-11:  ACRES  OF  COMMERCIAL  TIMBERLAND  AVAILABLE  FOR  HARVEST  BY  EXISTING  AND  PROPOSED 

ROAD  SYSTEMS,  BY  ALTERNATIVE 


Commercial  Timber 
land  Available, 
Existing 

Road  System  (acres) 

ALT 

1 

1,600 

ALT 

2 

1,600 

ALT 

3 

1,600 

ALT 

4 

1,600 

ALT 

5 

1,600 

ALT 

6 

PRE- 

FERRED 

1,600 

Alt 

2A 

1,600 

Miles  of  Proposed 
Road 

0 

16.8 

14.6 

17.8 

1.1 

17.8 

16.8 

Commercial  Timber- 
land Available,  Pro- 
posed Road  System 
(acres) 

0 

2,807 

1,874 

2,957 

150 

2,957 

2,807 

Commercial  Timber- 
land  Available  per 
Mile  of  Road  Con- 
structed (acres) 

0 

167 

128 

166 

136 

166 

167 

IV -55 


Moyer  SaK  Timber  Sale  Final  E8S 


Chapter  IV 


EFFECTS  TO  MINERALS 


EFFECTS  COMMON  TO  ALL  ACTION 
ALTERNATIVES 

There  are  numerous  mining  claims  within  the  anal- 
ysis area  boundary,  but  no  known  mineral  de- 
posits have  been  located  and  no  mineral  produc- 
tion has  occurred.  New  road  construction  in  the 
area  could  increase  interest  in  prospecting  and 
exploration,  both  through  improved  access  and  in 
possible  new  rock  exposures  created  by  road 
cuts.  New  roads  would  also  allow  access  by  truck- 
mounted  drill  equipment,  and  some  drilling  could 
be  anticipated. 

Mining  claimants  in  the  project  area  would  be  noti- 
fied of  the  proposed  road  construction  and  timber 
harvest.  Claimants  would  be  given  the  opportunity 
to  protect  claim  corners  and  discovery  monu- 
ments. The  Forest  Service  would  take  measures  to 
ensure  that  activities  do  not  materially  interfere 
with  potential  mineral  development. 


CUMULATIVE  EFFECTS 

Mineral  exploration  activities  are  a reasonably 
forseeable  future  action  that  could  involve  con- 
struction of  drilling  roads  and  other  surface  dis- 
turbance activities.  Any  impacts  greater  than  20 
acres  would  be  assessed  under  a separate  envi- 
ronmental assessment. 


CONSISTENCY  WITH  FOREST  FLAN 
STANDARDS  AND  GUIDELINES 

All  action  alternatives  and  the  no  action  alternative 
are  consistent  with  Forest  Plan  management  goals 
for  minerals. 


EFFECTS  TO  CULTURAL  RESOURCES 


EFFECTS  COMMON  TO  ALL  ACTION 
ALTERNATIVES 

Most  of  the  analysis  area  (areas  affected  by  Alter- 
natives 2 and  3)  has  been  inventoried  for  cultural 
resources.  No  cultural  sites  were  identified  and  the 


potential  for  discovery  of  cultural  sites  is  consid- 
ered low  (Chapter  III,  Cultural  Resources).  Prior  to 
ground  disturbance,  further  field  investigations 
would  be  done  to  identify  any  unknown  cultural 
sites.  If  any  are  discovered,  a decision  would  be 
made  to  avoid,  protect,  or  mitigate  the  site  in  ac- 
cordance with  the  National  Historic  Preservation 
Act.  The  timber  sale  contract  contains  a clause 
that  allows  cancellation  or  modification  of  the  tim- 
ber sale  contract  if  cultural  resources  are  found 
(see  Chapter  II,  Table  11-1  for  further  discussion  of 
Cultural  Resource  mitigations). 

CONSISTENCY  WITH  FOREST  PfLJ\N 
STANDARDS  AND  GUIDELINES 

All  alternatives  are  consistent  with  Forest  Plan 
standards  and  guidelines. 


ECONOMIC  EFFICIENCY 

The  economic  efficiency  of  each  alternative  was 
evaluated  by  calculating  the  present  net  value 
(PNV)  for  each;  the  results  are  shown  in  Table 
IV-12.  PNV  was  calculated  using  the  same 
computer-based  spreadsheet  used  for  generating 
the  Salmon  National  Forest’s  Timber  Sale  Program 
Information  Reporting  System  (TSPIRS)  Reports. 
In  this  method,  costs  associated  with  the  pro- 
posed timber  sale  such  as  sale  planning,  prepara- 
tion, administration,  and  on-the-ground  costs 
such  as  road  construction,  slash  disposal,  and 
reforestation  costs  are  subtracted  from  the  rev- 
enues gained  from  the  timber  sale.  These  costs 
and  benefits  are  inclusive  for  an  entire  stand  rota- 
tion (80-120  years)  and  then  discounted  back  to 
the  present.  This  analysis  does  not  consider  other 
non-monetary  costs  and  benefits  such  as  recre- 
ation and  water  production. 

Because  timber  prices  are  not  stable  but  fluctuate 
with  economic  conditions,  the  PNVs  for  the  Moyer 
Salt  Timber  Sale  Alternatives  2,  3,  4,  and  6 were 
calculated  using  two  different  stumpage  values 
(Table  IV-12).  Because  of  the  substantial  costs  as- 
sociated with  helicopter  logging,  the  PNV  for  Alter- 
native 5 was  only  determined  using  the  lower 
stumpage  estimate.  The  "Present  Trend"  PNV  in- 
corporates stumpage  values  from  the  1 990  Cop- 
perswan  Timber  Sale  on  the  Salmon  National  For- 
est, run  with  current  selling  values.  The 
Copperswan  sale  was  chosen  for  determining 


IV  - 56 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


stumpage  values  because  it  is  located  adjacent  to 
the  Moyer  Salt  analysis  area,  it  contained  a similar 
mix  of  tree  species,  and  has  a ratio  of  road  miles 
per  mmbf  that  is  similar  to  that  calculated  for  the 
proposed  Moyer  Salt  timber  sale.  The  'Long  Term 
Average"  PNV  uses  the  stumpage  values  in  the 
1990  TSPIRS  Reports  that  are  based  on  average 
selling  values  of  all  timber  sold  in  the  1 990  fiscal 
year. 

The  significant  differences  in  stumpage  values  re- 
sulted in  dramatically  different  PNVs.  This  is  a very 
important  point.  Alternatives  that  have  the  same 
mix  of  silvicultural  prescriptions  will  show  an  in- 
creasingly negative  PNV  with  an  increase  in  acres 
treated  when  stumpage  rates  are  somewhere  be- 
low $100/mbf  (long  term  average).  On  the  other 
hand,  a very  slight  increase  in  stumpage  rates,  for 
example  close  to  or  a little  over  $1 00/mbf  will  show 
the  opposite.  That  is,  with  an  increase  in  acres,  the 
PNV  will  be  increasingly  more  positive.  Therefore 
given  the  likelihood  of  reduced  Federal  timber  sup- 
ply and  increased  stumpage  values,  it  is  highly 
possible  that  the  "Present  Trend"  PNV  will  be  even 
higher  than  estimated  and  that  alternatives  that 
harvest  the  most  acres  will  ultimately  have  the 
highest  PNV. 

Gross  stumpage  was  calculated  and  displayed 
mainly  for  the  purpose  of  showing  the  opportunity 
cost  of  leaving  overmature  and  stagnant  timber 
stands  in  a nonproductive  condition  under  the  No 
Action  alternative  (Table  IV-12).  Calculations  and 
assumptions  for  losses  due  to  insect  and  disease 
as  well  as  delaying  treatment  are  shown  below. 
Stumpage  values  used  to  calculate  the  "Long-term 
average"  are  from  the  Copperswan  Timber  Sale, 
sold  in  1990.  The  "Present  Trend"  stumpage  val- 
ues were  determined  using  the  Copperswan  Tim- 
ber Sale  Appraisal  with  current  selling  values, 
resulting  in  considerably  higher  values.  It  is 
important  to  note  that  these  “high"  values  were 
appraised  rates  and  did  not  include  any  additional 
revenue  that  may  have  occurred  as  a result  of 
competitive  bidding. 


Road  costs  were  calculated  and  are  displayed  to 
illustrate  their  effect  on  "opportunity  costs"  (return 
to  the  government)  and  sale  viability.  For  example, 
one  would  expect  lower  returns  to  the  government 
as  road  costs  per  mbf  increase.  These  lower  re- 
turns directly  translate  into  either  lower  returns  to 
the  Treasury  or  less  KV  funds  to  perform  sale  area 
improvement  projects  with. 

In  addition  to  lower  returns  to  the  government, 
escalating  road  costs  may  eventually  reach  a point 
where  the  sale  may  not  sell.  In  1 992,  road  costs  on 
the  Salmon  National  Forest  ranged  from  $17/mbf 
to  $67/mbf.  Average  road  costs  for  predominantly 
lodgepoie  sales  (similar  to  Moyer  Salt)  were  ap- 
proximately $40/mbf. 

As  depicted  in  Table  IV-12,  alternative  3 for  the 
Moyer  Salt  timber  sale  has  a road  cost  in  excess 
of  $1 00/mbf.  While  road  costs  are  not  the  only 
factor  that  will  affect  sale  viability,  costs  of  this 
magnitude  are  a concern.  In  the  event  the  sale  did 
sell,  one  could  logically  expect  little  return  (over- 
bid) to  the  government. 

EFFECTS  COMMON  TO  ALL  ACTION 

ALTERNATIVES 

As  shown  in  Table  IV-1 2,  the  PNV  for  the  six  action 
alternatives  is  negative  for  those  values  generated 
using  the  long-term  average  for  calculation  of  the 
PNV.  Under  this  scenario,  the  proposed  timber 
sale  would  be  below  cost.  Due  to  the  recent  rapid 
rise  in  timber  prices,  the  PNV  for  the  action  alterna- 
tives calculated  using  current  selling  values  are  all 
positive.  Given  the  likelihood  of  reduced  Federal 
timber  supply  and  increased  stumpage  values,  the 
■Present  Trend"  PNV  may  be  even  higher  than  esti- 
mated if  one  of  the  Moyer  Salt  timber  sale  alterna- 
tives is  sold.  All  of  the  action  alternative  are  roughly 
the  same  in  terms  of  the  PNV  per  mmbf  calculated 
with  the  long  term  average.  However,  with  the  PNV 
calculated  with  the  current  selling  values,  the  PNV 
per  mmbf  is  vastly  different,  and  these  differences 
are  discussed  below  under  'Comparison  of  Alter- 
natives’. 


IV  - 57 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  ESS 


Chapter  IV 


TABLE  SV-12:  ECONOMIC  EFFICIENCY  BY  ALTERNATIVE 


MEASUREMENT 

ALT 

ALT 

ALT 

ALT 

ALT 

ALT 

ALT 

INDICES 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

2A 

PRE- 

FERRED 

PRESENT  NET 

VALUE: 

Long  Term  Avg* 

0 

-$210,077 

-$161,329 

-$300,679 

-$277,853 

-$183,069 

Present  Trend  *** 

0 

+$253,925 

+$303,502 

+$295,651 

-$94,938 

+$303,626 

+$262,241 

GROSS  STUMPAGE 
VALUE: 

(realized  or  lost) 
Long  term  Avg  ** 

0 

+$400,670 

+$306,186 

+$564,444 

+$69,315 

+$498,801 

+$343,235 

Present  Trend  *** 

0 

+$569,100 

+$525,300 

+$754,200 

+$706,200 

+$527,100 

ROAD  COSTS: 
Construction  Costs 

0 

+$372,150 

+$383,850 

+$411,150 

+$42,000 

+$411,150 

+$372,150 

Road  Costs/mbf1 

0 

+$76 

+$102 

+ $60 

+$26 

+$67 

+ $89 

* Estimated  using  SNF  TSPIRS  Values  (see  text  for  explanation) 

**  Estimate  based  on  past  timber  sale  (Copperswan) 

***  Estimate  based  on  past  timber  sale  run  with  current  selling  values  (Copperswan) 
1 mbf  = thousand  board  feet 


EFFECTS  BY  ALTERNATIVE 
Alternative  2 

Under  this  alternative,  the  PNV  calculated  using 
1990  selling  prices  would  be  $253,925.  The  road 
costs  associated  with  this  alternative,  when  divid- 
ed by  the  net  volume  produced,  yield  a road  cost 
of  $76  per  mbf.  This  value  exceeds  road  costs  for 
any  sale  sold  in  1 992.  It  may  represent  an  upper 
limit  of  sale  viability  (if  a sale  will  sell).  In  the  event 
the  sale  did  sell,  returns  to  the  government  in  the 
form  of  competitive  bidding  may  not  occur. 

Alternative  3 

Under  this  alternative,  the  PNV  calculated  using 
1990  selling  prices  would  be  $303,502.  The  road 
costs  associated  with  this  alternative,  when  divid- 
ed by  the  net  volume  produced,  yield  a road  cost 
of  $1 02  per  mbf.  These  road  costs  are  higher  than 
those  calculated  for  any  of  the  other  alternatives, 
and  reflect  the  cost  of  a two-road  access  system 
designed  to  address  potential  effects  to  wildlife. 


Road  costs  of  this  magnitude  may  likely  contribute 
to  a sale  that  would  not  sell.  In  the  event  the  sale 
did  sell,  returns  to  the  government  in  the  form  of 
competitive  bidding  may  not  occur. 

Alternative  4 

Under  this  alternative,  the  PNV  calculated  using 
1990  selling  prices  would  be  $295,651.  The  road 
costs  associated  with  this  alternative,  when  divid- 
ed by  the  net  volume  produced,  yield  a road  cost 
of  $60  per  mbf.  These  road  costs  are  second  low- 
est of  those  calculated  for  other  alternatives,  and 
reflect  the  decrease  in  cost  per  mbf  for  a sale  with 
higher  volumes  and  larger  cutting  units. 

Alternative  5 

Under  this  alternative,  the  PNV  calculated  using 
1990  selling  prices  would  be  -$94,938.  The  road 
costs  associated  with  this  alternative,  when  divid- 
ed by  the  net  volume  produced,  yield  a road  cost 
of  $26  per  mbf.  These  road  costs  are  lower  than 
those  calculated  for  any  of  the  other  alternatives, 
and  reflect  the  use  of  a helicopter  and  limited  road 
building.  Regardless  of  road  costs,  this  sale  may 
not  be  viable  due  to  the  high  costs  of  helicopter 


IV  - 58 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


yarding.  The  helicopter  costs  for  this  sale  are  high- 
er than  average  due  to  long  flights  and  small  piece 
size. 

Alternative  6 PREFERRED 

Under  this  alternative,  the  PNV  calculated  using 
1990  selling  prices  would  be  $303,626.  The  road 
costs  associated  with  this  alternative,  when  divid- 
ed by  the  net  volume  produced,  yield  a road  cost 
of  $67  per  mbf.  As  in  Alternative  4,  this  reflects  the 
decrease  in  cost  per  mbf  for  a sale  with  higher 
volumes  and  larger  cutting  units. 

Alternative  2A 

Under  this  alternative,  the  PNV  calculate  using 
1990  selling  prices  would  be  $262,241.  The  road 
costs  associated  with  this  alternative,  when  divid- 
ed by  the  net  volume  produced,  yield  a road  cost 
of  $89  per  mbf.  Road  costs  of  this  magnitude  may 
likely  contribute  to  a sale  that  would  not  sell.  In  the 
event  the  sale  did  sell,  returns  to  the  government 
in  the  form  of  competitive  bidding  may  not  occur. 


POTENTIAL  CONFLICTS  WITH  PLANS 
AND  POLIOSES  OF  OTHER 
JURISDICTIONS 

The  following  statements  are  provided  to  help  de- 
fine the  areas  of  potential  differences  between  the 
agency  proposing  this  action  (U.S.  Forest  Service) 
and  the  policies,  management,  and  enforcement 
responsibilities  of  other  agencies. 

Cultural  Resources 

The  laws  and  policies  that  govern  cultural  re- 
source protection  on  Federal  Lands  are  coordinat- 
ed with  the  State  Historic  Preservation  Officer 
(SHPO)  of  Idaho,  who  serves  in  an  advisory  capac- 
ity. The  policies  for  USFS  and  SHPO  are  consis- 
tent. 

To  date,  most  of  the  areas  proposed  for  manage- 
ment activities  (action  alternatives)  have  been 
evaluated  for  cultural  resources.  All  ground  dis- 
turbing activities  proposed  in  this  EIS  would  have 
a cultural  resource  clearance  before  any  disturb- 
ance to  the  ground  would  be  permitted  to  occur. 
Thus,  an  action  alternative  implementation  would 


be  pending  cultural  resource  clearance  in  accord- 
ance with  the  National  Historic  Preservation  Act. 


PROBABLE  ENVIRONMENTAL 
EFFECTS  THAT  CANNOT 
BE  AVOIDED 


Implementation  of  any  alternatives  would  in- 
evitably result  in  some  unavoidable  environmental 
effects,  both  adverse  and  beneficial.  Although  the 
management  requirements  and  mitigation  mea- 
sures associated  with  the  alternatives  would  re- 
duce or  prevent  some  potential  adverse  environ- 
mental impacts,  some  impacts  could  not  be 
completely  avoided.  Even  Alternative  1,  the  No 
Action  Alternative,  has  effects.  Unavoidable  im- 
pacts are  listed  briefly  below;  the  reader  is  referred 
to  the  appropriate  resources  section  in  this  Chap- 
ter for  more  detailed  information. 

Visual  Quality: 

All  of  the  action  alternatives,  particularly  Alternative 
4,  would  have  an  effect  on  the  visual  resource  from 
various  viewpoints  along  the  sensitive  travel  routes 
identified  in  Chapter  111.  Generally,  the  visual  vari- 
ety of  the  landscape  would  change,  making  man- 
agement activities  more  evident  as  areas  are  har- 
vested and  roads  are  built. 

Air  Quality: 

The  air  quality  of  the  analysis  area  would  be  tem- 
porarily affected  during  slash  burning  operations 
that  are  scheduled  as  part  of  the  timber  manage- 
ment program.  These  impacts  cannot  be  mitigated 
completely  but  would  be  performed  during  peri- 
ods when  air  dispersion  patterns  are  favorable  and 
would  therefore  be  temporary  in  nature. 

Roadless  Resource: 

All  action  alternatives  would  affect  about  16  per- 
cent of  the  existing  roadless  condition  of  the  Taylor 
Mountain  Roadless  Area,  except  Alternative  5 
which  affects  less  than  1 percent.  None  of  the 
alternatives  would  prevent  the  the  remainder  of  the 
roadless  area  from  being  considered  by  Congress 
for  incorporation  into  the  NWPS. 


IV  - 59 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  ESS 


Chapter  IV 


Recreation: 

Fall  logging  operations  could  discourage  the  use 
of  the  area  by  big  game  hunters.  The  operation  of 
heavy  equipment  and  hauling  on  roads  may  dis- 
turb game  movement  and  location  patterns,  ren- 
dering the  area  less  suitable  for  a quality  hunt. 

The  proposed  action  alternatives,  if  implemented, 
would  result  in  the  conversion  of  acres  within  the 
Recreation  Opportunity  Spectrum.  In  this  case,  the 
development  activities  would  result  in  conversion 
from  Semi-Primitive  Motorized  and  Semi-Primitive 
Nonmotorized  to  Roaded-Natural  Appearing,  ex- 
cept for  Alternative  5. 


IRREVERSIBLE  AND  IRRETRIEVABLE 
COMMITMENTS  OF  RESOURCES 


An  irreversible  commitment  of  resources  refers  to 
the  loss  of  production  or  use  of  a resource  due  to 
a land  use  decision  that,  once  executed,  cannot 
be  reversed,  except  perhaps  in  the  extreme  long 
term.  An  irretrievable  commitment  of  resources  ap- 
plies to  losses  of  production  or  use  of  renewable 
resources  for  a period  of  time. 

Irreversible  and  Irretrievable 

Roadless: 

All  action  alternatives  except  Alternative  5 would 
commit  a portion  of  the  roadless  resource  to  tim- 
ber harvest,  with  the  long-term  goal  of  continuing 
and  expanding  timber  harvest  in  that  area.  Road- 
less attributes  would  only  be  recovered  in  the  ex- 
treme long  term,  even  if  the  roads  are  obliterated 
and  the  area  is  reforested.  Therefore,  the  commit- 
ment is  irreversible  and  irretrievable. 

The  commitment  under  Alternative  5 is  irretriev- 
able as  a result  of  the  harvest  of  trees  but  is  not 
irreversible  because  no  roads  are  constructed 
within  the  roadless  boundary. 


Irretrievable 

Vegetation: 

Any  alternative  which  chooses  to  leave  overmature 
and  deteriorating  timber  stands  would,  to  some 
extent,  result  in  an  irretrievable  loss  of  timber  pro- 
ductivity (see  Economics  section,  this  chapter). 
The  No  Action  Alternative  would  have  the  greatest 
irretrievable  commitment  of  the  timber  resources, 
although  other  alternatives  would  also  have  vary- 
ing impacts  due  to  variations  in  the  amount  of 
timber  harvest.  Additional  losses  of  merchantable 
products  through  decay  and  mortality  of  current 
stands  would  also  be  an  irretrievable  commitment 
of  no  action  or  reduced  action. 

Visual  Quality: 

Alternative  4 would  result  in  an  irretrievable  com- 
mitment of  the  visual  resource,  as  timber  harvest 
activities  would  be  highly  evident  and  would  domi- 
nate the  scene  for  decades. 

Recreation  Resources: 

Road  construction  and  timber  harvesting  in  the 
analysis  area  would  convert  acres  from  Semi- 
primitive Motorized  and  Semi-primitive  Nonmotor- 
ized to  Roaded  - Natural  Appearing.  Because  the 
roads  and  timber  harvest  units  would  remain  for 
decades,  this  impact  would  be  irretrievable. 


OTHER  REQUIRED  DISCLOSURES 

Relationship  between  Short-term  Uses  of  Man’s 
Environment  and  the  Maintenance  and 
Enhancement  of  Long-term  Productivity 

Long-term  productivity  is  the  capability  of  the  For- 
est to  provide  resources  into  the  future.  Alt  of  the 
action  alternatives  improve  the  condition  of  the 
vegetative  resource  for  timber  production  by  con- 
verting trees  that  are  old,  no  longer  growing,  and 
infested  with  insects  and  diseases  into  vigorous 
young  and  healthy  stands.  Therefore,  the  pro- 
posed timber  harvest  and  wood  utilization  would 
be  a short-term  use  that  would  improve  the  long- 
term productivity  of  the  timber  stands. 


IV  - 60 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  IV 


Energy  Requirements  and  Conservation 
Potential  of  Various  Alternatives 
and  Mitigation  Measures 

There  would  be  no  unusual  energy  requirements 
for  implementing  any  of  the  alternatives. 


American  Indian  Treaty  Rights 

None  of  the  alternatives  would  conflict  with  any 
treaty  provisions. 

Threatened  and  Endangered  Species 

In  compliance  with  the  Endangered  Species  Act, 
the  Forest  Service  consulted  with  the  U.  S.  Fish 
and  Wildlife  Service  and  the  National  Marine  Fish- 
eries Service  concerning  Federally  Threatened 
and  Endangered  Species.  The  resulting  assess- 
ment indicates  that  the  habitat  of  one  Endangered 
species,  the  gray  wolf,  and  one  Federally  listed 
Threatened  species,  spring/summer  Chinook 
salmon,  exists  in  the  Moyer  Salt  analysis  area. 

The  Biological  Assessment  (BA)  for  terrestrial  ver- 
tebrates concluded  that  the  proposed  action,  with 
mitigations,  may  affect  but  is  not  likely  to  adversely 
affect  the  Endangered  gray  wolf,  its  habitat  or  its 
recovery  potential. 

The  effects  of  the  proposed  activities  on  the  Snake 
River  spring/summer  Chinook  salmon  and  Snake 
River  sockeye  salmon  was  documented  in  a BA 
prepared  for  the  Moyer  Salt  DEIS  (see  Moyer  Salt 
DEIS  and  FEIS,  Appendix  F).  Recent  agreements 
between  the  Forest  Service  and  the  National  Ma- 
rine Fisheries  Service,  however,  have  specified 
both  a modification  of  BA  formatting,  and  expan- 
sion of  project  analysis  to  encompass  possible 
cumulative  subbasin  effects  as  well  as  direct  and 
indirect  project  level  effects. 

The  final  Moyer  Salt  Biological  Assessment  of  ef- 
fects to  Snake  River  spring/summer  Chinook  and 
sockeye  salmon  is,  therefore,  being  documented 
within  the  Salmon  National  Forest’s  Proposed  Ac- 
tivity Review  for  the  Panther  Creek  Watershed.  The 
effects  analysis  methodology  specified  for  this 
Proposed  Activity  Review  places  a strong  empha- 
sis on  risks  of  temperature  and  sedimentation  ef- 


fects. As  the  original,  independent  BA  prepared  for 
the  Moyer  Salt  DEIS  document  included  discus- 
sions of  these  temperature  and  sedimentation 
risks,  conclusions  within  the  pending  Proposed 
Activity  Review  are  not  expected  to  deviate  from 
those  of  the  independent  analysis  included  within 
this  EIS  (See  Fisheries  section  in  this  Chapter). 


MlneraSs 

The  proposed  project  would  have  no  effect  on  the 
availability  of  lands  for  mining  under  federal  mining 
laws  and  regulations. 


Water  Quality 

The  State  of  Idaho  Forest  Practices  Water  Quality 
Management  Plan  and  Forest  Plan  Standard  and 
Guidelines  would  be  implemented  to  meet  state 
and  federal  water  quality  regulations. 


Effects  on  Prime  Farmland,  Rangeland, 
and  Forestland 

All  alternatives  are  in  keeping  with  the  intent  of  the 
Secretary  of  Agriculture  Memorandum  1872  for 
prime  land.  The  analysis  area  does  not  contain  any 
prime  farmland  or  rangeland.  “Prime"  forestland 
does  not  apply  to  lands  within  the  National  Forest 
System.  In  all  alternatives,  National  Forest  System 
lands  would  be  managed  with  sensitivity  to  the 
effects  on  adjacent  lands. 


Effects  of  Alternatives  on  Minorities  and  Women 

No  effects  on  Native  Americans,  other  minorities, 
women,  or  the  civil  rights  of  any  United  States 
citizen  would  be  anticipated  under  any  alternative. 


Effects  on  Wetlands  and  Floodplains 

The  effects  of  the  proposed  actions  on  wetlands 
are  described  in  the  'Wetlands’  section  of  this 
document. 

The  proposed  alternatives  would  not  affect  any 
floodplains. 


IV  - 61 


' 


Chapter  V 


List  of  Preparers 


Core  Interdisciplinary 

Team  Members  V-1 

Consultation  and  Review  V-3 

Approval  V-3 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  V 


CHAPTER  ¥ 

LIST  OF  PREPARERS 


This  section  lists  USDA  Forest  Service  employees  who  contributed  to  this  Final  ESS  by 
making  comments  during  the  interdisciplinary  team  scoping  process,  preparing  specialist 
reports,  writing  sections  of  the  document,  and/or  providing  technical  assistance. 


CORE  TEAM  INTERDISCIPLINARY  MEMBERS 

Doug  Basford,  timber/vegetation 
B.S.  Range 

Certified  Silviculturist:  course  work  in  ecosystem  management,  insect  and  disease 
control,  logging  systems,  genetics,  biological  diversity 

Author:  ’Developing  Stand  Density  Guides  for  Predicting  Growth  of  Timber  Species 
on  the  Salmon  National  Forest" 

25  years  related  experience. 

Lynn  Bennett:  team  leader/coordinator 

B.S.  in  Natural  Resource  Management:  course  work  in  forest  ecology,  wildlife 
biology,  watershed  management,  soils,  forest  management,  economics,  silvicul- 
ture, and  logging  systems 

Graduate  credits  in:  landscape  ecology,  silviculture,  economics,  plant  physiology, 
logging  systems,  population  dynamics  and  plant  genetics. 

1 5 years  related  experience. 

Russ  BJorklund:  economics,  vegetation/timber 
B.S.  Forest  Resource  Management 

Certified  Silviculturist:  course  work  in  forest  ecology,  forest  management,  and  soils. 
Graduate  credits  in  ecosystem  management,  logging  systems,  economics  and 
insect  and  disease. 

1 7 years  related  experience 

Tom  Bonn:  engineering;  transportation 

Civil  Engineering  Technician  with  course  work  in  logging  systems,  forest  road  and 
transportations,  engineering  economics,  operations  analysis,  and  soil  and  water- 
shed management. 

27  years  experience 

Tom  Buchta:  minerals 

B.S.  Forestry  with  emphasis  in  soil  science 
3 years  soil  scientist  experience 


V- 1 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Safl©  Final  ESS 


Chapter  V 


1 2 years  minerals  management  and  planning  experience 

Robin  FuelSenbach:  writing/editing/video 

B.S.  English:  technical  and  expository  writing,  journalism,  photography 
M.A.  Mathematics:  including  study  in  writing  technical  and  environmental  docu- 
ments (NEPA) 

1 8 years  related  experience. 

Clinton  GroBil:  District  Ranger 

B.S.  Range  Management:  prepared  numerous  timber  related  NEPA  documents  and 
range  allotment  management  plans  and  experience  in  sale  preparation  and  admin- 
istration. Additional  course  work  in  ecology. 

26  years  related  experience 

Merry  Hayden:  cultural  resources 

B.A.  Anthropology;  course  work  in  anthropology,  archaeology,  and  geology 
Author:  over  50  reports  and  publications  pertaining  to  cultural  resources 
1 0 years  experience  in  archaeology  and  cultural  resource  management 

Pat  Johnson:  engineering;  transportation 
B.S.  Civil  Engineering 
25  years  related  experience. 

Gary  Jackson,  soils/air  quality 

B.S.  Soil  Science  with  course  work  in  soil  chemistry,  soil  physics,  soil  microbology, 
soil  classification,  soil  mapping,  entomology,  organic  chemistry,  range  manage- 
ment, and  irrigation  water  management. 

Additional  training  in  air  pollution  control  and  smoke  management. 

Co-author:  Willcox  Area  Soil  Survey,  Arizona;  Coconino  County  Soil  Survey,  Ari- 
zona; Mt.  Trumbull  Soil  Survey,  Arizona;  and  Los  Prades  National  Forest  Soil 
Survey,  California. 

25  years  related  experience. 

Steve  Matz,  heritage  resources 

M.A.  Interdisciplinary  Studies  with  course  work  in  anthropology,  archaeological 
method  and  theory,  geology,  soils,  cultural  resource  management,  National  Historic 
Preservation  Act,  and  Archaeological  Resources  Preservation  Act. 

Author:  over  1 00  reports  and  publication  on  Cultural  Resource  Management  issues. 

13  years  related  experience 

Robbert  MlekeSsen:  range 

B.S.  Animal  Science/Range  Management  with  course  work  in  integrated  resource 
management,  range  vegetation,  range  analysis,  soil  science,  animal  nutrition, 
botany,  zoology,  forage  crops  and  plant  taxonomy. 

3 years  related  experience 

Betsy  RSeffenberger:  water  (hydrology) 

B.S.  Water  Resources  Development  with  emphasis  on  water  pollution  control. 
Course  work  in  hydrology,  soils  and  natural  resource  management. 


V - 2 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  V 


1 0 years  experience  as  Forest  Hydrologist. 

Robert  Rose:  fisheries 

B.S.  in  Fisheries  Management  with  emphasis  on  anadromous  fisheries  resources. 
Other  course  work  in  fisheries  biology,  water  quality,  limnology,  oceanography. 

1 1 years  related  experience  in  anadromous  fisheries  research,  management  and 
culture. 

Bruce  Smith:  fisheries 

B.S.  Fish  and  Wildlife  Management  with  emphasis  on  zoology,  botany,  English  and 
science. 

Additional  course  work  in  land,  fisheries  and  wildlife  management;  riparian  habitats; 
range;  minerals;  recreation;  stream  and  lake  habitat  inventory  and  management. 
Graduate  studies  in  fish  culture,  pond  and  reservoir  management.  Two  years  for- 
eign service  in  fisheries  management  and  research. 

20  years  related  experience. 

Ken  Stauffer:  recreation/roadless  character/visual  quality 
B.S.  Landscape  Architecture 

14  years  related  experience. 

Patricia  A.  Ultk:  public  involvement/writing/editing/video 
B.S.  Botany/Zoology;  M.S.  Botany/Zoology 

1 5 years  related  experience 

Dick  Wenger:  wildlife 

B.S.  Biology  with  emphasis  on  plant  and  animal  ecology  and  taxonomy 

M.S.  Wildlife  Biology  with  emphasis  on  wild  ungulate  ecology  and  management  and 

predator-prey  relationships 

Post  Graduate  studies  in  big  game  population  ecology  and  predator-prey  relation- 
ships 

1 9 years  related  experience. 


CONSULTATION  AND  REVIEW 

Dan  Baird:  Branch  Chief,  Recreation,  Range  and  Wildlife,  Salmon  National  Forest 

Gene  Jensen:  Land  Management  Planner,  Salmon  National  Forest 

Ernie  Schneider:  Branch  Chief,  Timber,  Aviation  and  Fire,  Salmon  National  Forest 


APPROVAL 

John  Burns:  Forest  Supervisor,  Salmon  National  Forest 


V - 3 


■ 


Chapter  VS 

Scoping  and 
Public 

Involvement 

Scoping  and  Public  and 
Interagency  Participation 
Opportunities  VI-1 

Consultation  with  Other 
Agencies  and  Organizations  VI-2 

List  of  Agencies,  Organiz- 
ations and  Individuals  that 
Responded  to  the  Draft  ESS  VI-2 

The  Major  Geographical  Sources  of 
Comment  Letters  VI-4 

The  Major  Issues  Raised  in  the 
Comment  Letters  VI-4 

List  of  Agencies,  Organiz- 
ations and  Individuals  to 
Whom  Copies  of  the  Final 
E8S  Were  Sent  V8-4 


Moyer  Salt  and  Salt  Creek  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  VI 


CHAPTER  VI 

SCOPING  AND  PUBLIC  INVOLVEMENT 


The  Salmon  National  Forest  encouraged  active  in- 
teragency and  public  involvement  throughout  the 
planning  and  analysis  process  for  the  Moyer  Salt 
Timber  Sale  Final  EIS.  This  chapter  summarizes  the 
public  participation  process,  and  includes: 

1 . A summary  of  public  and  interagency  partic- 
ipation opportunities  prior  to  the  Final  EIS; 

2.  A list  of  parties  who  attended  the  public 
scoping  meeting  in  Salmon,  Idaho,  prior  to  the 
Draft  EIS; 

3.  A list  of  parties  who  contributed  information 
and  views  on  the  Draft  EIS;  and 


timber  harvest  and  road  construction  activities  that 
would  be  implemented  under  the  proposed  timber 
sale.  A public  meeting  was  held  in  Salmon,  Idaho, 
on  August  30,  1 990  to  present  the  proposed  action 
to  the  public  and  to  encourage  public  involvement 
in  the  scoping  process.  An  announcement  describ- 
ing the  public  meeting  was  published  beforehand  in 
the  Salmon  Recorder  Herald  on  August  25,  1990. 
Site-specific  maps  and  resource  data  were  provid- 
ed to  the  public  at  this  meeting  to  assist  with  perti- 
nent and  relevant  discussion.  Table  VI-1  is  a list  of 
those  who  attended  the  public  scoping  meeting. 
The  written  comments  and  notes  from  these  public 
meetings  are  available  for  review  in  the  project  file 
(see  Open  House  Meeting,  Project  File). 


4.  A list  of  agencies,  organizations  and  individ- 
uals who  received  copies  of  the  Final  EIS. 

The  Final  EIS  contains  the  letters  and  comments 
received  in  response  to  scoping  on  the  Draft,  and 
the  Forest  Service  response  to  those  comments. 
These  are  bound  separately  and  distributed  with 
the  Final  EIS  document. 


Table  VI-1  Individuals  Who  Attended  the  Public 
Meeting  for  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  DEIS 


Gary  Goodman 
Tom  Reiger 
Hope  Benedict 
Donna  Godfrey 


Salmon,  Idaho 
Salmon,  Idaho 
Salmon,  Idaho 
Salmon,  Idaho 


Scoping  and  Public  and  Interagency  Participation 
Opportunities 

The  public  has  been  involved  in  the  analysis  pro- 
cess for  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  since  the  early 
planning  stages.  The  public  participation  process 
used  public  concerns  and  insights  to  help  resolve 
possible  resource  conflicts.  Concerns  and  insights 
were  documented  and  tracked  through  the  analysis 
process  (see  Issues  Analysis,  Project  File). 

In  early  1 990  a letter  was  sent  to  all  interested  per- 
sons disclosing  the  intentions  of  the  Cobalt  Ranger 
District  to  schedule  timber  sales  in  this  project  area 
between  1991  and  1993.  This  letter  requested  a 
response  from  the  interested  parties  if  they  had  any 
concerns.  A Notice  of  Intent  was  published  in  the 
Federal  Register  on  July  6, 1990  that  described  the 


During  the  scoping  process,  numerous  topics  were 
brought  up  as  possible  concerns  relating  to  road 
construction  and  timber  harvest.  These  topics  were 
addressed  by  the  forest  staff  of  resource  specialists. 
Based  upon  analysis  the  topics  were  either  sug- 
gested to  be  further  analyzed  in  the  EIS  or  were 
dismissed  as  not  appropriate  for  further  analysis  in 
this  EIS.  Topics  that  were  recommended  for  further 
analysis  in  this  EIS  are  described  in  Chapter  II  as 
issues  and  concerns.  The  decision  to  dismiss  a 
topic  from  further  analysis  was  based  on  whether 
there  was  a concern  that  a proposed  management 
action  may  yield  a noticeable  effect  to  the  human 
environment,  would  be  highly  controversial  and 
would  fall  within  the  scope  of  this  project  level  EIS. 
A complete  listing  of  topics  raised  and  the  parties 
who  brought  them  to  the  Forest  Service  attention 


VI  - 1 


Moyer  Salt  and  Salt  Creek  Timber  Sale  Final  E8S 


Chapter  V! 


can  be  found  in  the  project  file  (Issue  Analysis  and 
Scoping,  Project  File). 


Consultation  With  Other  Agencies 
and  with  Organizations 

Table  VI-2  lists  state  and  federal  agencies  (other 
than  the  Forest  Sen/ice)  and  private  organizations 
that  contributed  to  the  Draft  EIS.  Those  listed  con- 
tributed in  the  form  of  information  and  views, 
through  telephone  calls,  letters,  and  meetings. 


Table  VI-2:  Agencies  and  Organizations  who 
Commented  on  the  Notice  of  Intent 


Agencies: 

U.S.  Department  of  Interior  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service, 
Boise,  ID 

U.S  Environmental  Protection  Agency,  Portland,  OR 
U.S.  National  Marine  Fisheries  Service,  Portland, 
OR 

Organizations: 

Heritage  North,  Seattle,  WA 
Idaho  Conservation  League 
Salmon  Intermountain,  Inc.,  Salmon,  Id. 


Comments  and  information  received  during  formu- 
lation of  the  proposed  action  were  used  to  create 
alternatives  to  the  proposed  action  and  to  design 
mitigation  measures  to  be  implemented  during 
project  operation. 

Consultation  Between  Draft  and  Final  EIS 

The  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS  was  published 
in  the  Federal  Register  on  July  10,  1992.  Approxi- 
mately 1 00  copies  of  the  Draft  were  distributed  for 
public  review  starting  on  June  9,  1992.  A 45  day 
formal  public  comment  period  followed  this  date. 

Thirty-eight  public  comment  letters  were  received 
during  the  forma!  comment  period.  They  were  ana- 
lyzed and  formed  the  basis  of  the  FEIS  revision. 

Individual  comments  viewed  as  substantive  were 
summarized  and  responded  to  by  Forest  Service 
personnel.  Responses  to  all  comment  letters  along 
with  the  original  letter  were  bound  separately  and 
included  in  the  final  mailing  of  the  FEIS  and  those 
requesting  the  Summary  only. 

Table  VI-3  lists  all  individuals  and  organizations  that 
responded  to  the  Draft  EIS. 


Table  VB-3:  Agencies,  Organizations  and  Individuals  that  responded  to  the  Draft 


Agencies: 

Charles  S.  Polityka 

Dept,  of  the  Interior 

Office  of  Environmental  Affairs 

550  NE  Multnomah  Street,  Suite  600 

Portland,  Oregon  97232-2036 

Kathy  Veit 

Environmental  Protection  Agency 
Region  10 
1200  Sixth  Avenue 
Seattle,  WA  98101 


Linn  Kincannon 

Idaho  Conservation  League 

Box  2671 

Ketchum,  ID  833340 

Hadley  Roberts 
Idaho  Conservation  League 
708  Lombard  Street 
Salmon,  ID  83467 

Dan  Funsch 

Alliance  for  the  Wild  Rockies 
P.  O.  Box  8731 
Missoula,  MT  59807 


Organizations: 

Tom  Reiger 

Salmon  Intermountain,  Inc 
P.O.  Box  928 
Salmon,  Id.  83467 


Dallas  Olson 
Salmon  Intermountain 
Box  928 

Salmon,  ID  83467 
individuals: 


VI  -2 


Moyer  Salt  and  Salt  Creek  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  VI 


Doris  E.  Cole 

555  North  Roop  St.  #46 

Susanville,  CA  96130 

Anne  Kinnaman 
14582  SE  Anna  Marie  Ct. 
Milwaukie,  Or.  97267 

Nancy  Jochem 
2770  Kootenai 
Pocatello,  ID  83201 

Doug  and  Karen  Sholes 
Box  604 

Salmon,  ID  83467 

Toby  Friedman 
Box  8 

Gibbonsville,  ID  83463 
Erik  Fischer 

1900  Taylor  Ave  N,  Unit  J 
Seattle,  WA  98109 

Russell  Blalack 
1081  Milky  Way 
Cupertino,  CA  95014 

Terry  Myers 
Box  1006 
Salmon,  ID  83457 

Gene  Krebsbach 
E 1140  Crystal  Bay  Road 
Post  Falls,  ID  83854 

Terry  Benten 
HC  12,  Box  273 
Coeur  d’Alene  ID  83814 

Terry  Jayne 
1 568  Lola  Street 
Idaho  Falls,  ID  83402 

Claudia  Whitten 
601  Neyman  Street 
Salmon,  ID  83467 

Bert  Jefferies 
Rt  1,  Box  7B 
Salmon,  ID  83467 

Deborah  Bohren 
Box  607 


Ketchum,  ID  83340 

Cheryl  Hart  and  Daniel  Fritz 
Box  267 

Carmen,  ID  83462 

Deane  Johnson 
Box  31 0 

Ketchum,  ID  83340 

Jan  Benefie! 

358  E.  25th  Street 
Idaho  Falls,  ID  83404 

Ron  Watters 
1135  East  Bonneville 
Pocatello,  ID  83201 

Peter  Liporac 
Rt  3,  Box  282 
Blackfoot,  ID  83221 

John  Swanson 
3400  Edmund  Blvd. 
Minneapolis,  MN  55406 

June  Ringer 

129  E.  Fain/iew  Ave.  Apt  2 
Glendale,  CA  91207 

Katie  Fite 
1 1 541  Lloyd  Lane 
Caldwell,  ID  83605 

Mike  and  Jeanne  Stanford 
Cliffs  Rt 

Jordan  Valley,  OR  97910 

Joel  Tinsley 
54  South  Street 
Blackfoot,  ID  83221 

James  Irwin 
112  West  Fifth 
Jerome,  ID  83338 

Dennis  Baird 
Box  8787 
Moscow,  ID  83843 

Lynne  Stone 
Box  3519 

Ketchum,  ID  833340 


VI  -3 


Moyer  Salt  and  Salt  Creek  Timber  Sale  Fima!  ESS 


Chapter  VI 


Charles  Woods 
105  1 6th  Avenue 
Lewiston,  ID  83501 

Guy  Roberts 
306  Adams  Street 
Salmon,  ID  83467 

James  B.VanArk 
Box  1 1 64 
Challis,  ID  83226 

Nelle  Tobias 

14061  Farm  to  Market  Road 
McCall,  ID  83638 

The  Major  Geographical  Sources  of  Comment  Letters  on  the  Draft  ESS: 


Number  of  Comments 

Geographical  Area 

10 

18 

3 

3 

2 

1 

1 

Local  Area  (includes  Salmon,  Gibbonsville,  Carmen) 

Other  Idaho  Communities 

California 

Oregon 

Washington 

Minnesota 

Montana 

The  Major  Issues  Raised  In  the  Comment  Letters  on  the  Draft  EIS: 


Number  of  Comments 

Issue  Raised 

19 

2 

4 
1 
6 
3 

5 
12 
3 
17 
1 

7 

7 

32 

11 

Travel/Access 
Air  Quality 

New  Alternatives  Suggested 
Cultural  Resources 
Economics 

Ecosystem  Management 
Fisheries 

Mistrust  of  Agencies  Practices  and  Policies 

Threatened,  Endangered  and  Sensitive  Specie 

Range 

Soil 

Timber 

Water  Quality  and  Wetlands 
Wildlife 

Wilderness/Roadless 

List  of  Agencies,  Organizations  and  Individuals  for  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  to  the  following  agen- 

t©  Whom  Copies  of  the  Final  EIS  Were  Sent  cies,  organizations  and  individuals.  Those  receiving 

the  Final  EIS  (Table  VI-4)  have  30  days  to  comment. 
As  part  of  the  CEO  Regulations  for  implementing  Their  comments  should  be  as  substantive  as  possi- 
NEPA,  the  Forest  Service  is  circulating  the  Final  EIS  ble. 


VI  -4 


Moyer  Salt  and  Salt  Creek  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  VI 


Table  VI-4  List  of  Aqencles,  Organizations,  and  Individuals  to  Whom  Copies  of  the  Final  EIS  Were  Sent 

Agencies: 

P.  O.  Box  430 
Salmon,  ID  83467 

Dept,  of  the  Interior 

Office  of  Environmental  Affairs 

Mr.  Charles  H.  Lobdell,  Field  Supervisor 

1849  C Street,  NW,  Room  2024 

USDI-Fish  and  Wildlife  Service 

Washington,  D.C.  20240 

Boise  Field  Office 

4696  Overland  Road,  RM  576 

Kathy  Veit 

Environmental  Protection  Agency 

Boise,  ID  83705 

Region  10 

Dept,  of  the  Interior 

1200  Sixth  Avenue 

Charles  S.  Polityka 

Seattle,  WA  98101 

Office  of  Environmental  Affairs 
550  NE  Multnomah  Street,  Suite  600 

Environmental  Protection  Agency 

Portland,  Oregon  97232-2036 

Attn:  Office  of  Federal  Activities  (A-104) 
401  M Street,  SW., 

Idaho  Dept  of  Health  and  Welfare 

Washington,  D.C.  20460 

Division  of  Environment 
Joe  Nagel,  Administrator 

Environmental  Protection  Agency 

Statehouse 

Region  10 

Attn:  Office  of  Federal  Activities 

Boise,  ID  83720 

1 200  Sixth  Avenue 

Chris  Johnson 

Seattle  WA  98101 

Bureau  of  Air  Quality 
Division  of  Environmental  Health 

Forest  Service,  USDA 

Idaho  Department  of  Health 

Environmental  Coordinator 

1410  N.  Hilton  Street 

P.O.  Box  96090 

Boise,  ID  83706 

Washington,  D.C.  20013-6090 

Shoshone-Bannock  Tribes  Land  Use  Commission 

National  Marine  Fisheries  Service  (NOAA) 

Shaun  Robertson 

Environmental  and  Technical  Service 

P.  O.  Box  306 

911  NE  11th  Avenue  - Room  620 

Ft.  Hall,  ID  83203 

Portland,  OR  97232 

Organizations: 

Idaho  Department  of  Health 
George  Spinner 

Dale  A.  Stirling 

224  S Arthur 

Heritage  North 

Pocatello,  ID  83201 

11502  Phinney  Ave.  N. 
Seattle,  Wash  98133 

Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game 
Region  7 

Tom  Reiger 

Gary  Power,  Regional  Manager 

Salmon  Intermountain,  Inc 

P.  O.  Box  1336 

P.O.  Box  928 

Salmon,  ID  83467 

Salmon,  Id.  83467 

Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game 

Craig  J.  Gehrke 

Herb  Pollard,  Regional  Supervisor 

The  Wilderness  Society 

1515  Lincoln  Road 

413  West  Idaho  St,  Suite  102 

Idaho  Falls,  ID  83401 

Boise,  Id.  83702 

Roy  Jackson,  District  Manager 

James  Jensen 

Bureau  of  Land  Management 

Dames  and  Moore 

VI  - 5 


Moyer  Sail?  and  Salt  Creek  Timber  Sale  Final  ESS 


Chapter  VI 


102  South  17th  Rt  1 Box  49 

Boise,  ID  83702  Salmon,  ID  83467 


Clark  1.  Collins,  Executive  Director 
Blue  Ribbon  Coalition,  Inc. 

P.  O.  Box  5449 
Pocatello,  ID  83202 

Columbia  River  Inter-Tribal 
Fish  Commission 
975  SE  Sandy  #202 
Portland,  OR  97214 

Mike  Lyngholm 

F.  H.  Stoltze  Lumber  Company 
P.  O.  Box  389 
Dillon,  MT  59725 

Grass  Roots  for  Multiple  Use 
P.  O.  Box  383 
Darby,  MT  59829 

Phil  Nisbet,  President 
Grass  Roots  for  Multiple  Use 
315  Nyman 
Salmon,  ID  83467 

Jonathan  Stoke 
Idaho  Conservation  League 
P.  O.  Box  2235 
Hailey,  ID  83333 

Linn  Kincannon 

Idaho  Conservation  League 

Box  2671 

Ketchum,  ID  833340 

Hadley  Roberts 
Idaho  Conservation  League 
708  Lombard  Street 
Salmon,  ID  83467 

Carl  Ellsworth,  V-Pres. 

Lemhi  Cattle  & Horse  Growers  Assn. 
P.  O.  Box  60 
Leadore,  ID  83464 

Eugene  Edwards 

Lemhi  County  Planning  Commission 
P.  O.  Box  1145 
Salmon,  ID  83467 

Quinton  Snook 
Lemhi  Post  & Poles 


Mike  Medberry 
Idaho  Conservation  League 
Public  Lands  Director 
P.  O.  Box  2671 
Ketchum,  ID  83340 

Tim  and  Erica  Craig 
Nongame  Advisory  Committee 
Box  1 Lee  Creek  Road 
Leadore,  ID  83464 

Fabien  Ivanoff 

Pocatello  Trail  Machine  Assoc. 

141  Chase 
Pocatello,  ID  83201 

Rem  Kohrt 

Stoltze-Conner  Lumber  Co. 

P.  O.  Box  415 
Darby,  MT  59829 

Doug  Westfall 
Westfall  Logging,  Inc. 

P.  O.  Box  753 
Salmon,  ID  83467 

Craig  Gehrke 

Wilderness  Society 

413  West  Idaho  Street,  Suite  102 

Boise,  ID  83702 

Floyd  McCubbins 
Stoltze-Conner  Lumber  Co. 

P.  O.  Box  389 
Dillon,  MT  59725 

Donnie  Laughlin,  President 
Friends  of  the  Bitterroot 
P.O.  Box  442 
Hamilton,  Montana  59840 

Ralph  Maughan,  Cons.  Chair 
Eastern  Idaho  Group  Sierra  Club 
Box  1173 

Pocatello,  ID  83204 

Adena  Cook,  Public  Lands  Director 
Blue  Ribbon  Coalition 
P.  O.  Box  5449 
Pocatello,  ID  83202 


VI  - 6 


Moyer  Salt  and  Salt  Creek  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  VI 


Greg  C.  Burtchard 
Portland  State  University 
Department  of  Anthropology 
P.  O.  Box  751 
Portland,  OR  97207 

Mike  Rukavina 

Central  Idaho  Rod  & Gun  Club 
P.  O.  Box  177 
Challis,  ID  83226 

Gerald  A.  Jayne 
Idaho  Environmental  Council 
1 568  Lola  Street 
Idaho  Falls,  ID  83401 

Quinton,  Snook,  Chairman 
Lemhi  County  Commissioners 
506  - 9th  Street 
Salmon,  ID  83467 

Phil  West 

Idaho  Falls  Trail  Machine  Assoc 
2025  Claredot 
Idaho  Falls,  ID  83402 

Idaho  State  Snowmobile  Association 
P.  O.  Box3177 
Boise,  ID  83703 

Idaho  Trails  Council 
John  Bieker,  President 
3429  EID  Road 
Moscow,  ID  83843 

Eugene  Edwards 

Lemhi  County  Planning  Commission 
P.  O.  Box  1145 
Salmon,  ID  83467 

Idaho  Sportsman’s  Coalition 
413  W.  Idaho  Street 
Boise,  ID  83702 

Dave  Gaillard 
Wild  Forever 
P.O.  Box  1874 
Bozeman,  MT  59715 

Dan  Funsch 

Alliance  for  the  Wild  Rockies 
P.  0.  Box  8731 
Missoula,  MT  59807 


Dallas  Olson 
Salmon  Intermountain 
Box  928 

Salmon,  ID  83467 

Jerry  P.  Kelly 
Kelly  Logging 
Salmon,  ID  83467 


Carla  Heister 

S.J.  and  Jessie  E.  Quinney 
Natural  resources  Research  Library 
Utah  State  University 
Logan,  Utah  84322-5260 


Elected  Officials: 

United  States  Senate 
304  N 8th  Street  RM  149 
Boise,  ID  83702 

Honorable  Richard  H.  Stallings 
Member,  US  House  of  Representatives 
2539  Channing  Way,  Suite  240 
Idaho  Falls,  ID  83404 

Honorable  Steven  D.  Symmms 
United  States  Senator 
207  Federal  Building 
Pocatello,  ID  83201 

Honorable  Larry  LaRocco 
House  of  Representatives 
304  N 8th  Street  RM  134 
Boise,  ID  83702 

Individuals: 

Doris  E.  Cole 

555  North  Roop  St.  #46 

Susanville,  CA  96130 

E.  Lynne  Benedict 
1 668  Riverstone  Lane,  #208 
Boise,  Id.  83706 

Anne  Kinnaman 
1 4582  SE  Anna  Marie  Ct. 

Milwaukie,  Or.  97267 

John  R.  Swanson 
3400  Edmund  Blvd. 


VI -7 


Moyer  SaSt  and  Salt  Creek  Timber  Sale  Final  ESS 


Chapter  VI 


Minneapolis,  Minn.  55406 

Jerry  Hamilton 
Highway  93  N. 

Carmen,  ID  83462 

Guy  Roberts 
306  Adams  St. 

Salmon,  ID  83467 

Joe  Fraser 

North  Fork,  ID  83466 

Harry  E.  Wilson 
2120  N.  Callow  Ave. 
Bremerton,  WA  9831 2-2908 

Nancy  Jochem 
2770  Kootenai 
Pocatello,  ID  83201 

Doug  and  Karen  Sholes 
Box  604 

Salmon,  ID  83467 

Toby  Friedman 
Box  8 

Gibbonsville,  ID  83463 
Erik  Fischer 

1900  Taylor  Ave  N,  Unit  J 
Seattle,  WA  98109 

Russell  Blalack 
1081  Milky  Way 
Cupertino,  CA  95014 

Terry  Myers 
Box  1006 
Salmon,  ID  83457 

Gene  Krebsbach 
E 1 1 40  Crystal  Bay  Road 
Post  Falls,  ID  83854 

Terry  Benten 
HC  12,  Box  273 
Coeur  d’Alene  ID  83814 

Terry  Jayne 
1 568  Lola  Street 
Idaho  Falls,  ID  83402 

Claudia  Whitten 


601  Neyman  Street 
Salmon,  ID  83467 

Bert  Jefferies 
Rt  1 , Box  7B 
Salmon,  ID  83467 

Deborah  Bohren 
Box  607 

Ketchum,  ID  83340 

Cheryl  Hart  and  Daniel  Fritz 
Box  267 

Carmen,  ID  83462 

Deane  Johnson 
Box  31 0 

Ketchum,  ID  83340 

Jan  Benefiel 
358  E.  25th  Street 
Idaho  Falls,  ID  83404 

Ron  Watters 
1 135  East  Bonneville 
Pocatello,  ID  83201 

Peter  Liporac 
Rt  3,  Box  282 
Biackfoot,  ID  83221 

John  Swanson 
3400  Edmund  Blvd. 
Minneapolis,  MN  55406 

June  Ringer 

1 29  E.  Fairview  Ave.  Apt  2 
Glendale,  CA  91207 

Katie  Fite 
1 1 541  Lloyd  Lane 
Caldwell,  ID  83605 

Mike  and  Jeanne  Stanford 
Cliffs  Rt 

Jordan  Valley,  OR  97910 

Joel  Tinsley 
54  South  Street 
Biackfoot,  ID  83221 

James  Irwin 
1 1 2 West  Fifth 
Jerome,  ID  83338 


VI -8 


Moyer  Salt  and  Salt  Creek  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  VI 


Dennis  Baird 
Box  8787 
Moscow,  ID  83843 

Stew  Churchwell 
HC-82  Box  4024 
Challis,  ID  83226 

Lynne  Stone 
Box  351 9 

PUBLIC  LIBRARIES 

Ketchum,  ID  833340 

Charles  Woods 
1 05  1 6th  Avenue 
Lewiston,  ID  83501 

Salmon,  ID 
Challis,  ID 
Darby,  ID 

James  B.VanArk 
Box  1 1 64 
Challis,  ID  83226 

Public  Comment  Letters  snd  the  Forest  Service’s 
Responses 

Guy  Roberts 
306  Adams  Street 
Salmon,  ID  83467 

Nelle  Tobias 

14061  Farm  to  Market  Road 
McCall,  ID  83638 

Comment  letters  on  the  Draft  EIS  and  the  their  re- 
sponses are  bound  separately  in  Chapter  IV  - Sup- 
plement and  is  distributed  with  the  Final  EIS  docu- 
ment. 

VI  -9 


Chapter  VII 

Literature 

Cited 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  VII 


CHAPTER  ¥11 
LITERATURE  CITED 


Allendorf,  F.W.  1 983.  Isolation,  gene  flow,  and  genetic  differentiation  among  populations, 
pp  51-65  in  C.M.  Schoenewald-Cox,  S.M.  Chambers,  B.  MacBryde,  and  W.L.  Thomas  eds. 
Genetics  and  conservation:  a reference  for  managing  wild  animal  plant  populations.  The 
Benjamin/Cummings  Publishing  Company,  Inc.,  Menlo  Park,  CA. 

Allen,  K.  R.  1969.  "Limitations  on  Production  in  Salmonid  Populations  in  Streams",  In 
Symposium  on  Salmon  and  Trout  in  Streams,  T.  G.  Northcote,  ed.,  pp.  3-1 8.  H.  R.  MacMillan 
Lectures  in  Fisheries.  Univ.  of  British  Columbia:  Vancouver. 

American  Fisheries  Society.  1991.  Influence  Of  Forest  and  Rangeland  Management  on 
Salmonid  Fishes  and  Their  Habitat.  William  R.  Meehan,  Editor.  American  Fisheries  Society 
Special  Publication  #19.  Bethesda,  Maryland. 

Amman,  Gene  D.,  McGregor,  Mark  D.,  Cahill,  Donn  B.,  and  Klein,  William  H.  1977.  Guide- 
lines for  reducing  losses  of  lodgepole  pine  to  the  mountain  pine  beetle  in  unmanaged 
stands  in  the  Rocky  Mountains;  Intermountain  Forest  and  Range  Experiment  Station, 
USDA  Forest  Service  General  Technical  Report  INT-36.  19  pp. 

Anderson,  H.A.  1982.  Aids  to  Determining  Fuel  Models  for  Estimating  Fire  Behavior.  U.S. 
Forest  Service,  General  Technical  Report  INT-122,  1982. 

Bloom,  P.,  G.  Steward  and  B.  Walton.  1986.  The  Status  of  the  Northern  Goshawk  in 
California  1981-1983.  California  Department  of  Fish  and  Game.  Wildlife  Administrative 
Branch  Report  85-1 . 26  pp. 

Brookes,  Martha,  et  al.  1985.  Managing  trees  and  stands  susceptible  to  western  spruce 
budworm.  USDA  Forest  Service,  Technical  Bulletin  No.  1695. 

Burum,  D.,  M.  Sprague,  and  B.  Lewis.  1990.  USDA  Forest  Service  R4  Level  I General 
Aquatic  Wildlife  Survey  for  the  Salmon  National  Forest.  Unpublished  data.  Salmon  National 
Forest  Fisheries  Files. 

Burum,  D.,  M.  Sprague  and  B.  Lewis.  1 990.  USDA  Forest  Service  Region  4,  Salmon  National 
Forest,  GAWS  Level  I Stream  Habitat  Inventory.  USDA  Forest  Service:  Salmon,  Idaho. 

Call,  M.W.  1978,  Nesting  habitats  and  surveying  techniques  for  common  western  raptors. 
U.S.  Department  of  Interior  Bureau  of  Land  Management  Technical  Note  TN-316. 

Chapman,  D.  W.  1962.  "Effects  of  Logging  upon  Fish  Resources  of  the  West  Coast."  J.  of 
Forestry.  60(8):  533-537. 

Chapman,  D.  W.  1966.  "Food  and  Space  as  Regulators  of  Salmonid  Populations  in 
Streams."  American  Naturalist.  100:  345-357. 

Clark,  T.W.,  A.H.  Harvey,  R.D.  Dorn,  D.L.  Genterand  C.  Groves,  eds.  1989.  Rare,  Sensitive 
and  Threatened  Species  of  the  Greater  Yellowstone  Ecosystem.  Northern  Rockies  Conser- 


VII  - 1 


Moyer  Salt  TSmfoer  Sale  Final  E8S 


Chapter  VIE 


vation  Cooperative,  Montana  Natural  Heritage  Program,  The  Nature  Conservancy,  and 
Mountain  West  Environmental  Services.  1 53  pp. 

Columbia  River -Basin  Anadromous  Fish,  Policy  Implementation  Guide,  Interagency  Draft 
Agreement  for  Biological  Assessments  Cumulative  Effects,  November,  1 992. 

Connor,  J.J.  and  K.V.  Evans,  1986,  Geologic  Map  of  the  Leesburg  Quadrangle,  Lemhi 
County,  Idaho:  Department  of  the  Interior,  U.  S.  Geological  Survey 

Council  on  Environmental  Quality.  November  29,  1 978.  Regulations  for  Implementing  the 
Procedural  Provisions  of  the  National  Environmental  Policy  Act.  Title  40,  Code  of  Federal 
Regulations,  Parts  1500-1508  (40  CFR  1500-1508). 

Crane,  M.F.;  Fischer,  William  C.  1986  Fire  ecology  of  the  forest  habitat  types  of  Central 
Idaho.  General  Technical  Report  INT-218,  Ogden,  UT:  U.S.  Department  of  Agriculture, 
Forest  Service,  Sntermountain  Research  Station.  86  p. 

Crocker-Bedford,  D.  1990.  Goshawk  Reproduction  and  Forest  Management.  Wildlife  Soci- 
ety Bulletin  1 8:262-269. 

Evans,  W.  A.  and  F.  B.  Johnson.  1 980.  Fish  Migration  and  Fish  Passage:  A Practical  Guide 
to  Solving  Fish  Passage  Problems.  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture  Forest  Sen/ice 
EM-7100-2,  Washington,  D.  C. 

Federal  Register.  1991.  Endangered  and  Threatened  Species:  Proposed  Threatened  and 
Endangered  Status  for  Snake  River  Spring  and  Summer  Chinook  Salmon ; Vol  56,  No.  1 24, 
June  27,  1991,  50  CFR,  Pt227. 

Federal  Register.  1991.  Endangered  and  Threatened  Species:  Proposed  Endangered 
Status  for  Snake  River  Sockeye  Salmon ; Vol.  56,  No.  66,  April  5,  1991,  50  CFR,  P1222. 

Federal  Register.  1991.  Endangered  and  Threatened  Species:  Endangered  Status  for 
Snake  River  Sockeye  Salmon-,  Vol.  56,  No.  66,  November  22,  1991,  50  CFR,  Pt222. 

Federal  Register.  1992.  Endangered  and  Threatened  Species:  Threatened  Status  for  Snake 
River  Spring/Summer  Chinook  Salmon;  Threatened  Status  for  Snake  River  Fall  Chinook 
Salmon-,  Vol.  57,  No.  78,  April  22,  1992,  50  CFR,  Pt227. 

Fellin,  David  G.;  Schmidt,  Wyman  C.;  Carlson,  Clinton  E.  1984.  Silvicultural  Management 
Strategies  for  Pest  of  the  Interior  Douglas-Fir  and  Grand  Fir  Forest  Types.  Proceedings  of 
a Symposium.  Washington  State  University/Pacific  Northwest  Forest  and  Range  Exp. 
Station,  USDA  Forest  Service,  pp.  81-92. 

Firebaugh,  G.  May  8, 1991 . Letter  (2360/2430)  Cultural  Resource  Comments  on  the  Moyer 
Salt  Timber  Sale,  Alternatives  2 and  3.  USDA  Forest  Service,  Salmon  National  Forest, 
Salmon,  Idaho. 

Firebaugh,  G.  January  31 ,1991.  Letter  (2360/2430)  Cultural  Resources,  Moyer  Salt  Timber 
Sale,  Alternatives  2 and  3.  USDA  Forest  Service,  Salmon  National  Forest,  Salmon,  Idaho. 


VII  -2 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  ESS 


Chapter  VIS 


Forman,  R.T.T.  and  M.  Godron.  1986.  Landscape  Ecology.  John  Wylie  and  Sons. 

Gilpin,  M.  E.  and  M.  E.  Soule.  1980.  “Mimimum  Viable  Populations:  Processes  of  Species 
Extinction."  In:  Conservation  Biology:  The  Science  of  Scarcity  and  Diversity,  pp.  19-33. 
Sunderland,  Massachusetts:  Sinauer  Associates. 

Goggans,  R.,  R.  Dixon  and  1.  Seminara.  1988.  Habitat  Use  by  Three-toed  and  Black- 
backed  Woodpeckers.  Oregon  Department  of  Fish  and  Wildlife,  Non-game  Report 
87-03-02.  49  pp. 

Graham,  R.T.,  A.E.  Harvey,  M.F.  Jurgensen,  D.S.  Page-Dumroese,  J.R.  Tonn,  T.B.  Jain,  and 
K.  Geier-Hayes.  1991."  Sustaining  Soil  Productivity  of  Forest  Soils  in  the  Inland  Northwest." 
U.  S.  Department  of  the  Interior  Forest  Service,  Intermountain  Research  Station:  General 
Technical  Report,  Moscow,  Idaho. 

Greene,  G.  E.  1 950.  "Land  Use  and  T rout  Streams."  J.  Soil  and  Water  Consetv.  5: 1 25-1 26. 

Groves,  C.  1989.  Idaho’s  Amphibians  and  Reptiles.  Non  Game  Wildlife  Leaflet  #7.  Idaho 
Fish  and  Game,  Non-game  Program  publication.  Boise,  Idaho.  12p. 

Harvey,  A.  E.,  M.  E.  Jurgensen,  M.  J.  Larsen  and  R.  T.  Graham.  May,  1987.  Decaying 
Organic  Materials  and  Soil  Quality  in  the  Inland  Northwest:  A Management  Opportunity. 
General  Technical  Report  INT-225.  USDA  Forest  Service,  Intermountain  Research  Station: 
Ogden,  UT. 

Hayward,  G.  1 989.  Habitat  Use  and  Population  Biology  of  Boreal  Owls  in  the  Northern 
Rocky  Mountains,  U.S.A.  PhD  Dissertations,  University  of  Idaho.  113  pp. 

Harris,  L.D.  1984.  The  Fragmented  Forest.  University  of  Chicago  Press.  211  pp. 

Hornocker,  M.G.  and  H.S.  Hash.  1981.  "Ecology  of  the  Wolverine  in  Northwestern  Mon- 
tana." Con.  J.  Zoo.  59:1286-1301. 

Hutchins,  H.  E.  and  R.  M.  Lanner.  1982.  The  Central  Role  of  Clark’s  Nutcracker  in  the 
Dispersal  and  Establishment  of  Whitebark  Pine."  Oecologia  55:192-201. 

Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game.  1965.  Inventory  of  Idaho  Streams  Containing 
Anadromous  Fish,  Including  Recommendations  for  Improving  Production  of  Salmon  and 
Steelhead.  U.S.  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service,  Bureau  of  Commercial  Fisheries,  Contract 
Number  14-19-001-431.  June  15,  1965. 

Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game.  1 991 . Fisheries  Management  Plan  for  the  State  of 

Idaho,  1991-1995. 

Idaho  Department  of  Lands.  1 990.  Rules  and  Regulations  Pertaining  to  the  Idaho  Forest 
Practices  Act.  Title  38,  Chapter  13,  Idaho  Code.  (I  DAP  A 20.15). 

Jackson,  G.,  and  E.A.  Rieffenberger,  Feb.  5,  1992.  Letter  (2530/2430)  Timber  Sales  BMP 
Implementation  Monitoring.  USDA  Forest  Service,  Salmon  National  Forest,  Salmon, Idaho. 


VII  -3 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  Vli 


Jones,  S.  1 979.  The  Accipters  - Goshawks,  Cooper’s  Hawk,  Sharp-shinned  Hawk."  Habitat 
Management  Series  for  Unique  or  Endangered  Species.  Report  #17.  BLM  Technical  Note 
335,  Bureau  of  Land  Management,  Denver  Service  Center,  Denver,  Colorado. 

Keen,  F.  P.  1 936.  Relative  susceptibility  of  ponderosa  pine  to  bark-beetle  attack.  Journal 
of  Forestry  34:919-927. 

Keystone  Report.  1991.  Biological  Diversity  on  Federal  Lands:  Final  Consensus  Report  of 
the  Keystone  Policy  Dialogue  on  Biological  Diversity  on  Federal  Lands;  The  Keystone 
Center,  Keystone,  Colo.  April,  1991,  96  p. 

Kimble,  L.  A.,  and  T.  A.  Wesche.  1975.  "Relationship  Between  Selected  Physical  Parame- 
ters and  Benthic  Community  Structure  in  a Small  Mountain  Stream."  Wafer  Resource 
Research  institute  Series,  No.  55.  Univ.  of  Wyoming:  Laramie.  64  pp. 

Koehler,  G.  M.  and  J.D.  Brittell.  1 990.  "Managing  Spruce-fir  Habitat  for  Lynx  and  Snowshoe 
Hares."  Journal  of  Forestry.  88:10-14. 

Koski,  K.  V.  1 966.  The  Survival  of  Coho  Salmon  ( Oncoryhnchus  kisutch)  from  Egg  Deposi- 
tion to  Emergence  in  Three  Oregon  Coastal  Streams."  Oreg.  State  Univ.:  Corvallis.  84  pp. 
(Master’s  Thesis) 

Lemhi  County  Report,  1 990,  Robert  Loucks,  ed.  University  of  Idaho  Cooperative  Extension 
Service,  Salmon,  Idaho. 

Leopold,  L,  M.  G.  Wolman  and  J.  P.  Miller.  1964.  Fluvial  Processes  in  Geomorphology. 
W.  H.  Freeman  Co.:  San  Francisco,  CA.  522  pp. 

Lotan,  James  E.;  Perry,  David  A.  1983.  Ecology  and  regeneration  of  lodgepole  pine. 
Agriculture  Handbook  606,  USDA,  Forest  Service,  51  pp. 

Lyon,  L.  J.,  and  A.  L.  Ward.  1982.  "Elk  and  Land  Managment."  In  Elk  of  North  America, 
Ecology  and  Management,  eds.,  J.  W.  Thomas  and  D.  E.  Toweill,  pp.  447-448.  Stackpole 
Books:  Harrisburg,  PA.  698  pp. 

May,  B.  1985.  "Process  for  Determining  Resident  Fish  Capability  in  Forest  Streams." 
Salmon  National  Forest  Land  and  Resource  Management  Plan  Working  Paper  #5.  Salmon 
National  Forest  Fisheries  Files:  Salmon,  ID. 

McNiel,  W.  J.,  and  W.  H.  Ahnell.  1964.  Success  of  Pink  Salmon  Spawning  Relative  to  Size 
of  Spawning  Bed  Materials.  U.S.  Fish  and  Wild).  Serv.  Spec.  Sci.  Rep.  Fish.  No.  469. 1 5 pp. 

Meehan,  W.  R.,  F.  J.  Swanson  and  J.  R.  Sedell.  1977.  "Influence  of  Riparian  Vegetation  on 
Aquatic  Ecosystems  with  Particular  Reference  to  Salmonid  Fishes  and  their  Food  Supply." 
In  Importance , Preservation,  and  Management  of  Riparian  Habitat:  Proceedings  of  a Sym- 
posium; 1977,  July  9,  Tucson,  AZ.  tech,  coords.  Johnson,  R.R.  and  D.A.  Jones,  pp. 
137-145.  Gen.  Tech.  Rep.  RM-43.  U.S.  Department  of  Agriculture,  Forest  Service,  Rocky 
Mountain  Forest  and  Range  Experiment  Station:  Fort  Collins,  CO.  1977. 

Megahan,  Walter  F.1972.  "Effects  of  Logging  and  Logging  Roads  on  Erosion  and  Sedi- 
ment Depostition  from  Steep  Terrain."  Journal  of  Forestry.  70  (3)  136-141. 


VII  -4 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EES 


Chapter  VIS 


Multiple  Use  - Sustained  Yield  Acted  1960,  June  12,  1960.  74  Stat.  215,  as  amended:  16 
USC  528-531. 

National  Environmental  Policy  Act  of  1969,  as  Amended.  Public  Law  91-190,  42  U.S.C. 
4321-4347,  January  1,  1970,  as  amended  by  Public  Law  94-52,  July  3,  1975,  and  Public 
Law  94-83,  August  9,  1 975. 

National  Forest  Management  Act  of  1976.  October  22,  1976.  Public  Law  94-588.  94th 
Congress,  S.  3091.  Title  36,  Code  of  Federal  Regulations,  Part  219  (36  CFR  219). 

Northwest  Power  Planning  Council.  1 988.  Anadromous  Fish  Presence/Absence  Files  for 

The  Salmon  River  Basin. 

Phillips,  R.  W.  1970.  'Effects  of  Sediment  on  the  Gravel  Environment  and  Fish  Production.0 
In  Proceedings  of  Forest  Land  Uses  and  Stream  Environments,  pp.  64-75.  Oregon  State 
University:  Corvallis,  Oregon. 

i 

Quinn,  N.  W.  S.,  and  G.  Parker.  1987.  'Lynx'  pp.  682-694.  In:  Wild  Furbearers  Management 
and  Conservation  in  North  America.  M.  Novak,  J.A.  Baker,  M.E.  Obbard  and  B.  Mallock,  ed. 
Ontario  Trappers  Association/  Ministry  of  Natural  Resources.  Toronto,  Ontario,  Canada. 

Ralphs,  R.  M.,  and  working  team.  1981.  Elk  Habitat  Relationships  for  Central  Idaho.  A 
cooperative  effort  between  USDA-Forest  Service,  Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game, 
Bureau  of  Land  Management  and  University  of  Idaho.  57  pp. 

Reiser,  D.  W.  1 986.  Panther  Creek,  Idaho,  Habitat  Rehabilitation  - Final  Report.  BPA  Project 
No.  84-29.  Prepared  for:  U.S.  Department  of  Energy,  Bonneville  Power  Administration. 
Portland,  OR.  January,  1986. 

Rieffenberger,  E.A.  December  10,  1990.  Letter  (2525/2430):  Perreau  Creek  Timber  Sale 
Monitoring  Review.  USDA  Forest  Service,  Salmon  National  Forest,  Salmon,  Idaho. 

Rieffenberger,  E.A.  July  12,  1991.  Letter  (2540/2470)  Summarizing  Soil  and  Water  Best 
Management  Practices  for  Silvicultural  Activities.  USDA  Forest  Service,  Salmon  National 
Forest,  Salmon,  Idaho. 

Rose,  R.  1989-1990.  Personal  observations  of  Robert  Rose,  Fishery  Biologist,  Salmon 
National  Forest,  offish  species  presence  and  general  macroinvertebrate  community  com- 
position at  Snake  River  Adjudication  quantification  sites  during  1 989-1 990  field  operations. 

Rose,  R.  1 991 . Personal  observations  of  Robert  Rose,  Fishery  Biologist,  Salmon  National 
Forest,  of  macroinvertebrate  community  compositions  of  upper  Woodtick  Creek  and 
Goodluck  Creek  during  field  review  of  proposed  Moyer-Satt  Timber  Sale. 

Rosgen,  D.  L.  1978.  "Prediction  Techniques  for  Potential  Changes  in  Sediment  Discharge 
Due  to  Silvicultural  Activities.'  ASCE  Annual  Meeting.  Pittsburg,  PA.  1978.  12  pp. 

Rosgen,  D.  L.  1 985.  'A  Stream  Classification  System."  In  Riparian  Ecosystems  and  their 
Management  - Reconciling  Conflicting  Uses.  General  Technical  Report  RM-120.  Rocky 
Mountain  Forest  and  Range  Experiment  Station,  U.S.  Department  of  Agriculture  Forest 
Service:  Fort  Collins,  CO.  pp.  91-95. 


VII  -5 


Moyer  SaH  Umber  Salle  Flna!  ESS 


Chapter  VSS 


Sestak,  M.L.,  and  A.R.  Riebau.  1988.  ’Simple  Approach  Smoke  Estimation  Model 
"SASEM*";  U.S.  Bureau  of  Land  Management,  Wyoming  State  Office,  Cheyenne,  WY. 

Shuster,  W.C.  1983.  Northern  goshawk  nest  site  requirements  in  the  Colorado  Rockies. 
Western  Birds  1 1 :89-96. 

Simpson,  J.  C.,  and  R.  L.  Wallace.  1982.  Fishes  of  Idaho.  University  of  Idaho  Press.  238p. 

Smith,  B.  1 993.  Personal  Communicaton.  Discussions  with  Robert  Rose  concerning  priori- 
ties for  restoration  of  anadromous  fish  passage  on  Salmon  National  Forest  streams. 

Spahr,  R.,  L.  Armstrong,  D.  Atwood,  M.  Rath.  1991.  Threatened,  Endangered,  and  Sensitive 
Species  of  the  Intermountain  Region.  USDA  Forest  Service,  Intermountain  Region. 

Sprules,  W.  M.  1947.  An  Ecological  Investigation  of  Stream  Insects  in  Algonquin  Park, 
Ontario.  Univ.  Toronto  Studies.  Biol.  56.  Publ.  Ont.  Fish.  Res.  Lab.  69:  1-81. 

Steele,  Robert,  R.  D.  Pfister,  R.  A.  Ryker  and  J.  A.  Kittams.  1981.  Forest  Habitat  Types  of 
Central  Idaho.  USDA  For.  Serv.  Gen.  Tech.  Rep.  INT-114,  Intermountain  Forest  and  Range 
Experiment  Station:  Ogden,  Utah.  138  pp. 

Tackle,  David  1961.  Silvics  of  lodgepole  pine.  Misc.  Publ.  19,  rev.,  Ogden,  UT:  USDA  Forest 
Service  Intermountain  Forest  and  Range  Experiment  Station.  24  pp. 

Thomas,  J.  W.„  H.  Black,  Jr.,  R.  J.  Scherzinger,  and  R.  J.  Pederson.  1979.  “Deer  and  Elk." 
In  Wildlife  Habitats  in  Manged  Forests  - The  Blue  Mountains  of  Oregon  and  Washington,  ed., 
J.W.  Thomas,  pp.  104-127,  USDA  Handbook  No.  533.  Washington,  D.C.  512  pp. 

Towry,  R.  K,  1984.  "Wildlife  Habitat  Requirements,"  pp.  73-210.  In:  Managing  Forested 
Lands  for  Wildlife.  R.L  Hoover  and  D.L  Wills,  ed.  Published  by  Colorado  Division  of  Wildlife 
in  cooperation  with  USDA  Forest  Service,  Rocky  Mountain  Region,  Denver,  Colorado. 

Troendle,  C.  A.  1982.  The  Effects  of  Small  Clearcuts  on  Water  Yields  from  the  Deadhorse 
Watershed;  Frasier,  Colorado."  In  Proceedings  of  the  50th  Annual  Meeting  of  the  Western 
Snow  Conference,  (Reno,  Nevada;  April  19-23,  1982),  pp.  75-83.  Colorado  State  Univer- 
sity: Fort  Collins,  Colorado.  225  pp. 

Troendle,  C.A.,  and  R.M.  King.  1985.  The  Effect  of  Timber  Haivest  on  the  Fool  Creek 
Watershed,  30  Years  Later."  Water  Resources  Research  21,  p.  1915-1922. 

University  of  California.  1989-1990.  Crocker  Nuclear  Laboratory,  Davis,  California;  Report 
on  SFU  Sampler  data  for  1 989, 1 990  and  1 991  for  particle  sampler  site  on  South  Baldy  Mt., 
Salmon,  Idaho. 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture  Forest  Service.  1 973.  National  Forest  Landscape  Manage- 
ment, Volume  1.  Agriculture  Handbook  Number  434.  U.  S.  Government  Printing  Office: 
Washington,  D.  C. 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture  Forest  Service.  1 974,  reprinted  in  1 977.  National  Forest 
Landscape  Management,  Volume  2,  Chapter  1 , The  Visual  Management  System."  Agricul- 
ture Handbook  Number  462.  U.  S.  Government  Printing  Office:  Washington,  D.  0. 


VII  -6 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  VII 


U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture  Forest  Service.  1 977.  National  Forest  Landscape  Manage- 
ment, Volume  2,  Chapter  4,  "Roads."  Agriculture  Handbook  Number  483.  U.  S.  Government 
Printing  Office:  Washington,  D.  C. 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture  Forest  Service.  1980.  National  Forest  Landscape  Manage- 
ment, Volume  2,  Chapter  5,  Timber."  Agriculture  Handbook  Number  559.  U.  S.  Govern- 
ment Printing  Office:  Washington,  D.  C. 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture  Forest  Service.  1987.  Air  Resource  Management  Hand- 
book. FSH  2509.19. 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture  Forest  Service.  1990.  Title  2500  - Watershed  and  Air 
Management.  Region  4 Supplement  No.  75.  Ogden,  Utah. 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture  Forest  Service  and  Idaho  Department  of  Health  and 
Welfare  Division  of  Environment.  February  5,  1988.  "Memorandum  of  Understanding." 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture  Forest  Service.  1992.  Project  File  for  the  Moyer  Salt  and 
Salt  Creek  Timber  Sale  Draft  Environmental  Impact  Statement.  Salmon  National  Forest: 
Salmon,  ID.  (unpublished  data,  reports,  letters,  maps,  etc.) 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture  Forest  Service.  July  6, 1 990.  'Notice  of  Intent  for  the  Moyer 
Salt  and  Salt  Creek  Timber  Sale."  Federal  Register.  Vol.  55,  No.  190. 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture  Forest  Service.  1989.  Salmon  National  Forest  Noxious 
Weed  Control  Program  Environmental  Assessment.  Salmon,  ID. 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture  Forest  Service.  1988.  Land  and  Resource  Management 
Plan  for  the  Salmon  National  Forest.  Salmon  National  Forest:  Salmon,  ID. 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture  Forest  Service.  1988.  Salmon  National  Forest  Travel  Map. 
Salmon  National  Forest:  Salmon, Idaho. 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture  Forest  Service.  1 988.  Land  and  Resource  Management 
Plan  for  the  Salmon  National  Forest,  Final  Environmental  Impact  Statement.  Salmon  Nation- 
al Forest:  Salmon,  ID. 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture  Forest  Service.  1 988.  Land  and  Resource  Management 
Plan  for  the  Salmon  National  Forest,  Record  of  Decision.  Salmon  National  Forest:  Salmon, 
Idaho. 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture  Forest  Service.  1 988  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Environmental 
Assessment.  Salmon  National  Forest:  Salmon,  ID. 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture  Forest  Service.  1989.  Our  Approach:  Forest  Plan  Imple- 
mentation of  Desired  Future  Condition  (A  Desk  Reference).  Northern  Region  Programming, 
Planning  and  Budgeting:  Odgen,  Utah. 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture  Forest  Service.  1 976. " The  National  Forest  Management  Act 
of  1976:  Current  Information  Report  No.  16. 


VII  -7 


Moyer  Salt  Umber  Sal©  FiraaB  E8S 


Chapter  VII 


U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture  Forest  Service.  1 986.  Recreation  Opportunity  Spectrum 

Book. 

U.  S.  Department'©!  Agriculture  Forest  Service,  1978,  Section  Hi:  Salmon  Uplands  Section 
Composition  Book,  Landtypes  Inventory,  and  appendix  material. 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture  Forest  Service.  1981.  Soil  Scientist  Report,  November, 

1981 

U.S.  Department  of  Agriculture  Forest  Service.  1977.  Water  Resource  Inventory  of  the 
Taylor  Mountain  Planning  Unit,  (unpublished  data). 

U.S.  Department  of  Agriculture  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service.  Letter,  January  29,  1 991 . Threat- 
ened and  Endangered  Species  List  for  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Project. 

U.S.  Department  of  Agriculture  Soil  Conservation  Service.  1975.  "Soil  Taxonomy:  A Basic 
System  of  Soil  Classification  for  Making  and  Interpreting  Soil  Surveys".  Soil  Survey  Staff, 
USDA  Department  of  Agriculture  Handbook  #436,  p.  XX. 

United  States  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service.  1987.  Northern  Rocky  Mountain  Wolf  Recovery 
Plan.  U.S.  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service.  Denver,  Colorado.  119  pp. 

United  States  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service.  1 992.  Wolf  Recovery  in  Yellowstone  National  Park 
and  Central  Idaho.  Alternative  Scoping  Report.  US  F&WS,  Helena,  Montana.  7p. 

Waring,  R.H.;  Pitman,  C.B.  1980.  A simple  model  of  host  resistance  to  bark  beetle  attack. 
Res.  Note  65,  Forest  Research  Laboratory,  Oregon  State  University,  Corvallis,  OR,  2 pp. 

Westveld,  M.  1954.  A budworm  vigor-resistance  classification  for  spruce  and  balsam 
fir;Journal  of  Forestry,  52:11-24. 

Wilcox,  D.  S.  1985.  “Nest  Predation  in  Forest  Tracts  and  the  Decline  of  Migratory  Song- 
birds." Ecology  66:  1211-1214. 

Yee,  C.  S.,  and  T.  D.  Roelofs.  1980.  "Planning  Forest  Roads  to  Protect  Salmonid  Habitat." 
In  Influence  of  Forest  and  Range-land  Management  on  nadromous  Fish  Habitat  in  Western 
North  America,  ed.,  W.  Meehan.  Pacific  Northwest  Forest  and  Range  Experiment  Station. 
USDA  Forest  Service:  Portland,  Oregon. 


VII  - 8 


Glossary 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Glossary 


GLOSSARY 


A 

Accelerated  Soil  Erosion  - above-natural  levels  of  soil  erosion. 

Access  - usually  refers  to  a road  or  trail  route  over  which  a public  agency  claims  a 
right-of-way  for  public  use;  a way  of  approach. 

Acre-foot  - a unit  of  measurement  equal  to  the  volume  which  would  cover  one  acre  to  a 
depth  of  one  foot  (i.e.,  43,560  cubic  feet). 

Affected  Environment  - the  natural,  physical,  and  human-related  environment  that  is 
sensitive  to  changes  due  to  proposed  actions;  the  environment  under  the  administration 
of  one  line  officer,  such  as  District  Ranger  or  Forest  Supervisor. 

Age  Class  - one  of  the  intervals  into  which  the  age  range  of  trees  is  divided  for  classifica- 
tion or  use.  Age  class  1 = 0-39  years;  class  2 = 40-79  years;  class  3 = 80-1 19  years;  class 
4 - 120-159  years;  class  5 = 160  years  and  up. 

Airshed  - a geographical  area  that,  because  of  topography,  meteorology,  and  climate, 
shares  the  same  air. 

Allotment  Management  Plan  (AMP)  - (see  RANGE  ALLOTMENT)  the  management  plan 
by  which  areas  are  designated  for  the  use  of  a prescribed  number  and  kind  of  livestock. 
A document  that  specifies  the  actions  to  be  taken  to  manage  and  protect  the  rangeland 
resources  and  reach  a given  set  of  objectives  (FSM  2210). 

Allowable  Sale  Quantity  (ASQ)  - the  quantity  of  timber  that  may  be  sold  from  the  area  of 
suitable  land  covered  by  the  Forest  Plan  for  a time  period  specified  by  the  Plan.  This 
quantity  is  usually  expressed  on  an  annual  basis  as  the  "average  annual  allowable  sale 
quantity." 

Alternative  - a mix  of  management  prescriptions  and  land  allocations  applied  to  specific 
land  areas  to  achieve  a set  of  goals  and  objectives;  one  of  several  policies,  plans,  or 
projects  proposed  for  decision  making. 

AMP  - allotment  management  plan 

Anadromous  Fish  - those  species  of  fish  that  mature  in  the  sea  and  migrate  into  streams 
to  spawn;  i.e.,  salmon,  steelhead. 

Analysis  area  - one  or  more  capability  areas  grouped  for  purposes  of  analysis;  similar  land 
area(s)  of  various  sizes  based  on  common  impacts,  effects,  and  social  or  economic 
factors. 

Apparent  Naturalness  - one  of  the  six  roadless  area  characteristics  and  wilderness 
features;  a condition  of  the  environment  when  it  looks  natural  to  most  people  using  the 


Glossary  - 1 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Glossary 


area.  It  is  a measure  of  importance  of  visitors’  perceptions  of  human  impacts  to  the  area. 
Even  though  some  of  the  long-term  ecological  processes  of  an  area  may  have  been 
interrupted,  the  landscape  of  the  area  generally  appears  to  be  affected  by  the  forces  of 
nature.  If  the  landscape  has  been  modified  by  human  activity,  the  evidence  is  not  obvious 
to  the  casual  observer,  or  it  is  disappearing  due  to  natural  processes. 


B 


Background  - the  distant  part  of  a landscape,  picture,  or  the  visible  terrain  beyond  the 
foreground  and  middleground  where  individual  trees  are  not  visible  but  blend  into  the  total 
fabric  of  the  timber  stand  (approximately  three  miles  or  more  from  the  viewer). 

Baseline  - with  respect  to  soils,  the  amount  of  erosion  and  sedimentation  due  to  natural 
sources  in  the  absence  of  human  activity. 

Below  Cost  - timber  sales  that  cost  more  to  prepare,  sell,  and  administer  than  they  return 
in  revenue. 

Benchmark  - an  analysis  reference  point  of  the  maximum  physical/biological  capability  to 
produce  a resource  output  from  Forest  lands  while  maintaining  minimum  legal  require- 
ments for  production  of  other  resources  and  maintenance  of  soil  and  water  productivity. 
Benchmarks  define  the  area  (i.e.,  provide  the  bounds)  within  which  alternatives  can  be 
formulated. 

Beneficial  Water  Uses  - Uses  of  water  from  a stream,  lake  or  reservoir  that  are  considered 
beneficial.  The  Idaho  Water  Code  defines  those  recognized  by  the  State  of  Idaho. 

Berm  - an  edge  or  shoulder  running  alongside  a road,  canal,  etc.;  any  level  strip  of  ground 
at  the  summit  or  sides,  or  along  the  base,  of  a slope. 

Best  Management  Practice  (BMP)  - a practice  or  combination  of  practices  determined 
by  the  state  to  be  the  most  effective  and  practicable  (including  technological,  economic 
and  institutional  considerations)  means  of  preventing  or  reducing  the  amount  of  pollution 
generated  by  non-point  sources  to  a level  compatible  with  water  quality  goals,  (see  also 
Appendix  D) 

Big  Game  - those  species  of  large  mammals  normally  managed  as  a sport  hunting 
resource. 

Biological  Diversity  - the  distribution  and  abundance  of  different  plant  and  animal  com- 
munities and  species  over  time  and  space. 

Biological  Growth-potential  - the  average  net  growth  attainable  in  a fully  stocked  natural 
forest  stand. 

Biota  - the  animal  and  plant  life  of  a region  or  period,  (see  COLD  WATER  BIOTA,  WARM 
WATER  BIOTA) 


Glossary  - 2 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Glossary 


BLM  - Bureau  of  Land  Management 

Board  Feet  - the  amount  of  wood  equivalent  to  a piece  of  wood  one  foot  by  one  foot  by 
one  inch  thick.  Generally,  five  board  feet  log  measure  is  approximately  equivalent  to  one 
cubic  foot  of  round  wood. 

Buffer  Strip  - land  area  of  varying  size  and  shape  immediately  adjacent  to  stream  courses 
or  to  water  bodies  on  which  the  type  and/or  intensity  of  land  use  is  tempered  to  meet 
defined  water  resource  goals.  (From:  "An  Approach  to  Water  Resources  Evaluation  of 
Non-Point  Silvicultural  Sources,"  EPA-600/8-80-012). 

Bureau  of  Land  Management  - federal  land  management  organization  operating  under 
the  Department  of  Interior. 


c 


Canopy  - the  more-or-less  continuous  cover  of  branches  and  foliage  formed  collectively 
by  the  crown  of  adjacent  trees  and  other  woody  growth. 

CEQ  - Council  on  Environmental  Quality 

CFR  - Code  of  Federal  Regulations 

Characteristic  Landscape  - the  naturally  established  landscape  within  a scene  or  scenes 
being  viewed. 

Cirque  Basin  - the  term  in  geomorphology  for  basins  of  semi-circular  form  found  in  the 
Pyrenees.  They  range  in  size  from  a few  meters  to  several  kilometers  and  occur  at  the  head 
of  glacial  troughs.  Also  called  valley  head  cirques. 

Class  I Stream  - a perennial  or  intermittent  stream  which  has  one  or  more  of  the  following 
characteristics:  (1)  is  the  direct  source  of  water  for  domestic  use  (cities,  recreation  sites, 
etc.);  (2)  is  used  by  large  numbers  of  fish  for  spawning,  rearing,  or  migration;  (3)  flows 
enough  water  to  have  a major  influence  on  water  quality  of  another  Class  I stream. 

Class  II  Stream  - a perennial  or  intermittent  stream  which  has  one  or  both  of  the  following 
characteristics:  (1)  is  used  by  moderate  though  significant  numbers  of  fish  for  spawning, 
rearing,  or  migration;  (2)  flows  enough  water  to  have  a moderate  influence  on  downstream 
quality  of  a Class  I or  II  stream. 

CSearcut  - the  removal,  in  a single  cut,  of  all  trees  in  stands  larger  than  seedlings. 

Clearcutting  - the  cutting  method  that  describes  the  silviculture  system  in  which  the  old 
crop  is  cleared  over  a considerable  area  at  one  time.  Regeneration  then  occurs  from  (a) 
natural  seeding  from  adjacent  stands,  (b)  seed  contained  in  the  slash  or  logging  debris, 
(c)  advance  growth,  or  (d)  planting  or  direct  seeding.  An  even-aged  forest  usually  results. 


Glossary  - 3 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  E!S 


Glossary 


Climax  - the  highest  ecological  development  of  a plant  community  capable  of  perpetuation 
under  the  prevailing  climactic  and  soil  conditions. 

Climax  Species  - those  species  that  dominate  a climaxed  plant  community. 

Clone  - (as  in  Aspen  Clone)  - aspen  trees  in  clumps  with  one  root  system. 

Code  of  Federal  Regulations  (CFR)  - the  listing  of  various  regulations  pertaining  to 
management  and  administration  of  the  National  Forests.  • 

Codominant  (a  crown  class)  - species  in  a mixed  crop  that  are  about  equally  numerous 
and  vigorous;  forming  part  of  the  upper  canopy  of  a forest,  less  free  to  grow  than  domi- 
nants but  freer  than  intermediate  and  suppressed  trees. 

Cold  Water  Biota  - waters  which  are  suitable  or  intended  to  be  made  suitable  for  protec- 
tion and  maintenance  of  viable  communities  of  aquatic  organisms  and  populations  of 
significant  aquatic  species  which  have  optimal  growing  temperatures  below  18  degrees 
C. 

Commercial  Thinning  - harvesting  an  immature  stand  to  maintain  or  accelerate  the  growth 
of  the  remaining  trees;  also  called  an  intermediate  cut. 

Community  Stability  - a community’s  capacity  to  handle  change  without  major  hardships 
or  disruptions  to  component  groups  or  institutions. 

Community  Type  - a generalized  category  comprising  a number  of  similar  units  or  stands 
of  vegetation  such  as  a lodgepole  pine  or  ponderosa  pine  plant  community 

Compaction  - the  packing  together  of  soil  particles  by  forces  exerted  at  the  soil  surface, 
resulting  in  increased  density;  reduction  of  pore  space  and  reduced  infiltration  of  water 

Concern  (or  subissue)  - results  from  a concern  that  was  voiced  in  a public  or  interdisci- 
plinary team  meeting;  does  not  drive  the  development  of  an  alternative,  but  will  be  dis- 
closed for  each  alternative. 

Condition  Class  - a grouping  of  timber  stands  into  size-age-stocking  classes  for  Forest 
planning. 

Conifer  - those  cone-bearing  trees,  mostly  evergreen,  including  the  pine,  spruce,  fir,  etc. 

Cord  - a unit  of  gross  volume  measurement  for  stacked  roundwood  based  on  external 
dimensions,  generally  implies  a stack  of  four  feet  by  four  feet  vertical  cross  section  and 
eight  feet  long,  contains  128  stacked  cubic  feet. 

Corps  of  Engineers  - a separate  branch  of  the  U.S.  Army  which  has  the  responsibility  of 
overseeing  civil  engineering  projects,  especially  those  concerned  with  waterways. 

Corridor  - a linear  strip  of  land  identified  for  the  present  or  future  location  of  transportation 
or  utility  rights-of-way  within  its  boundaries. 


Glossary  - 4 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Glossary 


Costs  - the  negative  or  adverse  effects  or  expenditures  resulting  from  an  action.  Costs  may 
be  monetary,  social,  physical  or  environmental  in  nature. 

Cost  Effectiveness  - achieving  specified  outputs  or  objectives  under  given  conditions  for 
the  least  cost. 

Cost  Efficiency  - the  usefulness  of  specified  inputs  (costs)  to  produce  specified  outputs 
(benefits).  In  measuring  cost  efficiency,  some  outputs,  including  environmental,  economic, 
or  social  impacts,  are  not  assigned  monetary  values  but  are  achieved  at  specified  levels 
in  the  least  cost  manner.  Cost  efficiency  is  usually  measured  using  present  net  value, 
although  use  of  benefit/cost  ratios  and  rates-of-return  may  be  appropriate. 

Council  on  Environmental  Qualify  - An  advisory  council  to  the  President  established  by 
the  National  Environmental  Policy  Act  of  1969.  It  reviews  federal  programs  for  their  effect 
on  the  environment,  conducts  environmental  studies,  and  advises  the  President  on  envi- 
ronmental matters. 

Cover  - vegetation,  usually  coniferous,  that  provides  either  thermal  or  hiding  cover  for 
wildlife. 

Cover:forage  Ratio  - the  ratio  of  cover  (usually  conifer  types)  to  foraging  areas  (natural 
openings,  clearcuts,  etc.). 

Creep  - the  slow  movement  downslope  of  soil  and  rock  debris  usually  without  water. 

Critical  Habitat  - that  habitat  designated  by  the  Secretary,  USD!,  as  critical  to  the  contin- 
ued survival  of  threatened  or  endangered  species 

Crown  - the  leaves  or  needles  and  living  branches  of  a tree. 

Crown  Height  - of  a standing  tree,  the  vertical  distance  from  ground  level  to  the  base  of 
the  crown  measured  either  to  the  lowest  live  branchwhorl  or  to  the  lowest  live  branch 
(excluding  shoots  arising  spontaneously  from  buds  on  the  stem  of  a woody  plant)  or  to 
a point  halfway  between. 

Crown  Ratio  - the  ratio  between  the  crown  of  a living  tree  and  its  total  height,  usually  given 
as  a percent. 

Cubic  Foot  - the  amount  of  timber  equivalent  to  a piece  of  wood  one  foot  by  one  foot  by 
one  foot. 

Cull  - any  item  of  production;  e.g.,  trees,  logs,  lumber,  picked  out  for  relegation  or  rejection 
because  it  does  not  meet  certain  specifications. 

Cultural  Resources  - buildings,  sites,  areas,  architecture,  memorials,  and  objects  having 
scientific,  prehistoric,  historic,  or  social  values. 

Cumulative  Effect  - the  effect  on  the  environment  which  results  from  the  incremental 
effects  of  the  action  when  added  to  other  past,  present,  and  reasonable  foreseeable  future 
actions  regardless  of  what  agency  (federal  or  non-federal)  or  person  undertakes  such 


Glossary  - 5 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Glossary 


other  actions.  Cumulative  effects  can  result  from  individually  minor  but  collectively  signifi- 
cant actions  taking  place  over  a period  of  time  (40  CFR  1508.7). 

Current  Direction  - the  combination  of  activities  dictated  by  laws,  regulations,  the  Forest 
Service  Manual-,  and  existing  unit  plans. 

Cutslope  - uphill  side  of  a road  built  on  a hill. 

Cutting  Cycle  - the  planned  lapse  of  time  between  successive  cutting  in  a stand. 


D 


DBH  - Diameter  at  Breast  Height;  the  diameter  of  a tree  measured  4.5  feet  above  the 
ground. 

Decision  Criteria  - essentially  the  rules  or  standards  used  to  evaluate  alternatives;  mea- 
surements or  indicators  that  are  designed  to  assist  a decision-maker  to  identify  a preferred 
choice  from  the  array  of  possible  alternatives. 

Decision-maker  - the  responsible  official  who  chooses  which  alternative  or  proposal  to 
follow  on  a proposed  action. 

Decking  Areas  - sites  that  are  intermediate  between  stump  and  landing,  used  to  collect 
logs. 

Deferred  Rotation  Grazing  - discontinuance  of  grazing  on  various  parts  of  a range  in 
succeeding  years,  allowing  each  part  to  rest  successively  during  the  growing  season  to 
permit  seed  production,  establishment  of  seedlings,  or  restoration  of  plant  vigor.  Two,  but 
usually  three  or  more,  separate  grazing  units  are  required.  Control  is  usually  insured  by 
unit  fencing,  but  may  be  obtained  by  herding  on  sheep  ranges. 

DEIS  - draft  environmental  impact  statement. 

Desired  Future  Condition  (DFC)  - the  physical  changes  which  are  anticipated  to  result 
from  carrying  out  planned  management  practices  at  two  points  in  time;  at  the  end  of  ten 
years  and  at  the  end  of  fifty  years. 

Developed  Recreation  - recreation  where  facilities  are  provided,  such  as:  roads,  parking 
lots,  picnic  tables,  toilets,  drinking  water,  ski  lifts,  buildings. 

Developed  Recreation  Site  - relatively  small,  distinctly  defined  area  where  developed 
recreation  facilities  are  provided  for  concentrated  public  use;  e.g.,  campground,  picnic 
areas,  swimming  areas. 

Diameter  at  Breast  Height  - (DBH)  the  diameter  of  a standing  tree  measured  at  a point 
four  feet-six  inches  from  ground  level  on  the  uphill  side. 


Glossary  - 6 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Glossary 


Direct  Effects  - effects  that  are  caused  by  an  action  and  that  occur  at  the  same  time  and 
place. 

Dispersal  Corridor  - a corridor  through  which  animal  populations  move  or  distribute 
themselves  throughout  an  area. 

Dispersed  Recreation  - outdoor  recreation  in  which  visitors  are  diffused  over  relatively 
large  areas.  Where  facilities  or  developments  are  provided,  they  are  more  for  access  and 
protection  of  the  environment  than  for  the  comfort  or  convenience  of  the  people. 

Distance  Zone  - one  of  three  categories  used  in  the  Visual  Management  System  to  divide 
a view  into  near  and  far  components;  used  as  a frame  of  reference  in  which  to  discuss 
landscape  characteristics  or  activities  of  man.  The  three  categories  are:  (1 ) foreground,  (2) 
middleground,  and  (3)  background. 

Disturbed  Area  - the  surface  area  affected  by  a logging/road  building  operation. 

Diversity  - the  distribution  and  abundance  of  different  plant  and  animal  communities  and 
species  within  the  area  covered  by  a Land  and  Resource  Management  Plan.  (See  also 
BIOLOGICAL  DIVERSITY,  VEGETATIVE  DIVERSITY,  STRUCTURAL  DIVERSITY.) 

Dominant  (a  crown  class)  - one  of  four  main  crown  classes  for  forests  recognized  ona 
basis  of  relative  status  and  condition  in  the  crop.  Dominant  trees  have  their  crowns  in  the 
uppermost  layers  of  the  canopy  and  are  largely  free-growing. 


E 


Economic  Efficiency  - a measure  of  how  well  costs  achieve  benefits  when  all  costs  and 
benefits  are  identified  and  valued. 

Economic  Impacts  - Direct  economic  impact:  effects  caused  directly  by  forest  product 
harvest  or  processing  or  by  forest  uses,  indirect  economic  impact:  effects  that  occur  when 
supporting  industries  sell  goods  or  services  to  directly  affected  industries.  Induced  eco- 
nomic impact:  effects  that  occur  when  employees  or  owners  of  directly  or  indirectly 
affected  industries  spend  their  income  within  the  economy. 

Ecosystem  - an  interacting  system  of  organisms  considered  together  with  their  environ- 
ment; for  example,  marsh,  watershed,  and  lake  ecosystems. 

Ecotones  - transition  zones  between  two  different  plant  communities,  such  as  that  be- 
tween forest  and  sagebrush  flat. 

Effects  - environmental  consequences  as  a result  of  a proposed  action.  Included  are  direct 
effects,  which  are  caused  by  the  action  and  occur  at  the  same  time  and  place,  and  indirect 
effects,  which  are  caused  by  the  action  and  are  later  in  time  or  further  removed  in  distance, 
but  which  are  still  reasonable  foreseeable,  indirect  effects  may  include  growth-inducing 
effects  and  other  effects  related  related  to  induced  changes  in  the  pattern  of  land  use, 


Glossary  - 7 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Saie  Final  EiS 


Glossary 


population  density,  or  growth  rate,  and  related  effects  on  air  and  water  and  other  natural 
systems,  including  ecosystems. 

Elk  Habitat  Potential  (EHP)  - a measurement  of  possible  elk  habitat  using  the  measure- 
ments of  cover:forage  ratio,  open  road  density,  and  calculating  a percentage  using  these 
measures.  It  is  the  ratio  of  forested  cover  to  open  forage  areas,  dependent  upon  habitat 
type  and  open  and  closed  road  densities.  A 100%  EHP  indicates  a perfect  balance 
between  cover  and  forage  in  an  unroaded  area.  The  optimal  cover:forage  ratio  for  most 
habitat  types  is  40:60. 

Endangered  Species  - any  species  of  animal  or  plant  that  is  in  danger  of  extinction 
throughout  all  or  a significant  portion  of  its  range.  Plant  or  animal  species  identified  by  the 
Secretary  of  the  Interior  as  endangered  in  accordance  with  the  1 973  Endangered  Species 
Act. 

End-hauled  - in  road  building,  moving  earth  along  the  roadway  from  a through-cut  to  a 
through-fill. 

Environment  - the  aggregate  of  physical,  biological,  economic,  and  social  factors  affecting 
organisms  in  an  area. 

Environmental  Analysis  - an  analysis  of  alternative  actions  and  their  predictable  environ- 
mental effects,  including  physical,  biological,  economic,  and  social  consequences  and 
their  interactions;  short-  and  long-term  effects;  direct,  indirect,  and  cumulative  effects. 

Environmental  Assessment  (EA)  - a concise  public  document  which  serves  to  (a)  Briefly 
provide  sufficient  evidence  and  analysis  for  determining  whether  to  prepare  an  EIS  or  a 
Finding  of  No  Significant  Impact;  (b)  Aid  an  agency’s  compliance  with  NEPA  when  no  EIS 
is  necessary;  (c)  Facilitate  preparation  of  an  EIS  when  necessary. 

Environmental  Impact  Statement  (EIS)  - a detailed  statement  prepared  by  the  responsi- 
ble official  in  which  a major  Federal  action  which  significantly  affects  the  quality  of  the 
human  environment  is  described,  alternatives  to  the  proposed  action  provided,  and  effects 
analyzed. 

Ephemeral  Reach  - a stream  segment  which  flows  only  briefly  and  in  response  to  local 
precipitation,  and  whose  channel  lies  above  the  level  of  the  water  table. 

Ephemeral  Stream  - a stream  that  flows  only  as  a direct  response  to  rainfall  or  snowmelt 
events.  It  has  no  base  flow. 

Erosion  - detachment  or  movement  of  soil  or  rock  fragments  by  water, wind,  ice,  or  gravity. 
Accelerated  erosion  is  much  more  rapid  than  normal,  natural  or  geologic  erosion,  primarily 
as  a result  of  the  influence  of  activities  of  man,  animals,  or  natural  catastrophes. 

Even-aged  Management  - the  application  of  a combination  of  actions  that  results  in  the 
creation  of  stands  in  which  trees  of  essentially  the  same  age  grow  together.  Managed 
even-aged  forests  are  characterized  by  a distribution  of  stands  of  varying  ages  (and, 
therefore,  tree  sizes)  throughout  the  forest  area.  The  difference  in  age  between  trees 
forming  the  main  canopy  level  of  a stand  usually  does  not  exceed  20  percent  of  the  age 
of  the  stand  at  harvest  rotation  age.  Regeneration  in  a particular  stand  is  obtained  during 


Glossary  - 8 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Glossary 


a short  period  at  or  near  the  time  that  a stand  has  reached  the  desired  age  or  size  for 
regeneration  and  is  harvested,  Clearcut,  shelterwood,  or  seed  tree  cutting  methods  pro- 
duce even-aged  stands. 

Even-aged  Silviculture  - The  combination  of  timber  management  actions  that  result  in  the 
creation  of  stands  where  trees  of  essentially  the  same  age  grow  together. 

Even-aged  Stand  - a timber  stand  where  all  the  trees  are  the  same  age  or  at  least  of  the 
same  age  class;  a stand  is  considered  even-aged  if  the  difference  in  age  between  the 
oldest  and  youngest  trees  does  not  exceed  20  per  cent  of  the  length  of  the  rotation. 

Evaporation  - the  process  by  which  water  is  changed  from  the  liquid  or  solid  state  into  the 
gaseous  state  through  the  transfer  of  heat,  (see  also  EVAPOTRANSPIRATION) 

Evapofranspiration  - the  process  by  which  water  is  evaporated  from  wet  surfaces  and 
transpired  by  plants,  (see  also  TRANSPIRATION) 


F 


FEIS  - Final  Environmental  Impact  Statement. 

Fill  Slope  - earth  excavated  during  road  building  using  the  side-cast  method.  Earth  is 
taken  out  of  a hillside  (cut)  and  placed  on  the  downhill  side  or  fill  slope  to  create  a flat 
terrace. 

Filter  strip  - a strip  of  vegetation  that  retards  the  flow  of  runoff  water,  causing  deposition 
of  transported  material  and  thereby  reducing  sediment  flow. 

Fisheries  Habitat  - streams,  lakes  and  reservoirs  that  support  fish. 

FLRMP  - Forest  Land  and  Resource  Management  Plan. 

Forage  - all  browse  and  non-woody  plants  that  are  available  to  wildlife  for  grazing  or 
harvested  for  feeding. 

Forage  Area  - vegetated  area  with  less  than  60  percent  combined  canopy  closure  of  tree 
and  tall  shrub  (greater  than  seven  feet  in  height).  This  includes  the  grass-forb,  shrub  and 
open  sapling-pole  stand  conditions  and  may  include  some  older  stands  that  have  been 
thinned.  In  a managed  forest  the  primary  forage  areas  are  those  that  have  had  all  or  most 
of  the  forest  canopy  removed,  i.e.  clearcut  or  shelterwood  units. 

Forb  - any  herbaceous  plant  species  other  than  those  in  the  Gramineae  (grasses),  Cyper- 
aceae  (sedges),  and  Juncaceae  (rushes)  families;  fleshy-leaved  plants. 

Foreground  - a term  used  in  visual  management  to  describe  the  stand  of  trees  immedi- 
ately adjacent  to  the  high-value  scenic  area,  recreation  facility,  or  forest  highway. 


Glossary  - 9 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Glossary 


Forest  Development  Roads  (and  Trails)  - a legal  term  for  Forest  roads  or  trails  that  are 
under  the  management  of  the  Forest  Service. 

Forest  Land  - land  at  least  1 0 percent  occupied  by  forest  trees  or  formerly  having  had  such 
tree  cover  and- not  currently  developed  for  non-forest  use.  Lands  developed  for  non-forest 
use  include  areas  for  crops,  improved  pasture,  residential  or  administrative  areas,  im- 
proved roads  of  any  width,  and  adjoining  road  clearing  and  powerline  clearing  of  any 
width. 

Forest  Land  and  Resource  Management  Plan  (FLRMP)  - in  this  document,  Salmon 
National  Forest’s  Forest  Plan. 

Forest  Plan  - a program  for  the  management  of  the  National  Forest’s  renewable  re- 
sources. Each  unit  of  the  National  Forest  System  is  required  by  the  National  Forest 
Management  Act  to  prepare  a Forest  Plan  every  ten  to  fifteen  years. 

Forest  Supervisor  - the  official  responsible  for  administering  the  National  Forest  System 
lands  in  a Forest  Service  administrative  unit,  which  may  consist  of  two  or  more  National 
Forests  or  all  the  Forests  within  a state.  He  reports  to  the  Regional  Forester. 

Forest  System  Roads  - roads  that  are  part  of  the  Forest  development  transportation 
system,  which  includes  all  existing  and  planned  roads  as  well  as  other  special  and  terminal 
facilities  designated  as  Forest  development  transportation  facilities. 

Fragmentation  - is  the  process  of  breaking  up  ecosystems  into  partially  or  wholly  isolated 
habitats.  It  contributes  to  the  loss  of  biological  diversity. 

Fry  - the  life  stage  of  salmonid  fish  species  that  refers  to  the  juvenile  fish  which  have  either 
not  emerged  from  the  gravel  or  have  recently  emerged. 

FSH  - Forest  Service  Handbook. 

FSM  - Forest  Service  Manual. 

Fuel-loading  - the  condition  where  amounts  of  burnable  forest  materials  accumulate  in  an 
area,  thus  contributing  to  the  fire  hazard  of  that  area. 

Fuels  - include  both  living  plants  and  dead,  woody  vegetative  materials  which  are  capable 
of  burning. 

Full  Bench  - in  road  building,  a type  of  road  in  which  no  fill  is  used;  the  road  is  completely 
cut  from  the  hillside. 


G 

Game  Species  - any  species  of  wildlife  or  fish  for  which  hunting  seasons  and  bag  limits 
have  been  established,  and  which  are  normally  harvested  by  hunters,  trappers,  and 
fishermen  under  State  and  Federal  laws,  codes,  and  regulations. 


Glossary  - 1 0 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Glossary 


Goal  - a concise  statement  that  achieves  a desired  condition  to  be  achieved  sometime  in 
the  future.  It  is  normally  expressed  in  broad,  general  terms  and  is  timeless  in  that  it  has 
no  specific  date  by  which  it  is  to  be  accomplished.  Goal  statements  form  the  principal  basis 
from  which  objectives  are  developed. 

Granitics  - of,  or  pertaining  to,  or  composed  of  granite  or  granite-like  rock.  Soils  derived 
from  this  parent  material. 

Grazing  Allotment  - see  RANGE  ALLOTMENT. 

Growing  Season  - the  months  of  the  year  during  which  a species  of  vegetation  grows. 

Guideline  - an  indication  or  outline  of  policy  or  conduct;  any  issuance  that  assists  in 
determining  the  course  of  direction  in  any  planned  action  accomplishing  a specific  objec- 
tive. 


Habitat  - the  place  where  a plant  or  animal  naturally  or  normally  lives  or  grows. 

Habitat  Diversity  - the  distribution  and  abundance  of  different  plant  and  animal  communi- 
ties and  species  within  a specific  area,  (see  also  WILDLIFE  HABITAT  DIVERSITY) 

Hiding  Cover  - vegetation  that  will  hide  90  percent  of  an  elk  from  the  view  of  a human  at 
a distance  of  200  feet  or  less.  The  distance  at  which  the  animal  is  essentially  hidden  is 
called  a “sight  distance." 

Hydrograph  - a graphic  representation  of  stage,  discharge,  velocity,  or  other  properties 
of  water  flow  with  respect  to  time 


IDT  - interdisciplinary  team. 

Implementation  - those  activities  necessary  to  respond  to  the  approved  Land  and  Re- 
source Management  Plan  (Forest  Plan). 

Indicator  Species  - a plant  or  animal  species  adapted  to  a particular  kind  of  environment. 
Its  presence  is  sufficient  indication  that  specific  habitat  conditions  are  also  present. 

Indirect  effects  - environmental  consequences  caused  by  a proposed  action  but  occur- 
ring later  in  time.  Indirect  effects  may  include  growth-inducing  effects  and  other  effects 
inducing  changes  in  land  use,  population  density,  growth  rate  and  related  effects  on  air, 
water,  and  other  natural  systems,  including  ecosystems. 


Glossary  - 1 1 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Glossary 


Interdisciplinary  Approach  - the  use  of  individuals  representing  two  or  more  areas  of 
knowledge  and  skills  focusing  on  the  same  task,  problem,  or  subject.  Team  member 
interaction  provides  necessary  insight  to  all  stages  of  the  process. 

Interdisciplinary  Team  (IDT)  - the  group  of  individuals  with  different  training  assembled 
to  solve  a problem  or  perform  a task,  in  this  case  the  EIS  document.  The  team  is  assembled 
out  of  recognition  that  no  one  scientific  discipline  is  sufficiently  broad  to  adequately  solve 
the  problem. 

intermittent  Stream  - a stream  which  flows  only  at  certain  times  of  the  year  when  it  receives 
water  from  springs  or  from  some  surface  source  such  as  melting  snow  in  mountainous 
areas. 

Interstitial  Spaces  - in  this  context,  pertaining  to  small  narrow  spaces  between  soil 
particles;  a measurement  of  soil  types. 

Irregular  Shelterwood  - a modification  of  a shelterwood  cut  in  which  some  of  the  trees  of 
the  overwood  are  retained  long  after  the  seed  cutting. 

Irretrievable  - applies  to  losses  of  production,  harvest,  or  commitment  of  renewable 
natural  resources.  For  example,  some  or  all  of  the  timber  production  from  an  area  is 
irretrievably  lost  during  the  time  an  area  is  used  as  a winter  sports  site.  If  the  use  is 
changed,  timber  production  can  be  resumed.  The  production  lost  is  irretrievable,  but  the 
action  is  not  irreversible. 

Irreversible  - applies  primarily  to  the  use  of  non-renewable  resources,  such  as  minerals 
or  cultural  resources,  or  to  those  factors  that  are  renewable  only  over  long  time  spans, 
such  as  soil  productivity.  Irreversible  also  includes  loss  of  future  options. 

Issue  - results  from  a concern  determined  in  public  or  interdisciplinary  team  meetings; 
voices  an  unresolved  conflict  to  be  addressed  by  the  planning  process  or  EIS. 

Issues,  Concerns,  and  Opportunities  (ICO)  - a public  issue  is  a subject  or  question  of 
widespread  public  interest  relating  to  management  of  the  National  Forest  resources,  as 
identified  through  public  participation  and  addressed  through  the  planning  process.  A 
management  concern  is  an  issue,  problem,  or  a condition  which  constrains  the  range  of 
management  practices  identified  by  the  Forest  Service  in  the  planning  process.  A manage- 
ment opportunity  is  a statement  of  general  actions,  measures,  or  treatments  that  address- 
es a public  issue  or  management  concern  in  a favorable  way. 


J-K 


Jackpot  - in  a forest,  a large  accumulation  of  fuel  that  can  occur  naturally  or  as  a 
by-product  of  timber  harvest. 

Key  Elk  Summer  Range  (KESR)  - that  portion  of  the  summer  elk  range  essential  for  the 
continuation  of  both  the  pre-  and  post-reproductive  elk  cycles. 


Glossary  - 12 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Glossary 


Key  Summer  Range  - that  portion  of  the  summer  range  essential  for  the  continuation  of 
the  pre-  and  post-reproductive  cycles  for  all  wildlife  species. 

Key  Winter  Range  - the  portion  of  the  year-long  range  where  big  game  find  food  and/or 
cover  during  severe  winter  weather. 


L 

Land  Class  - the  topographic  relief  of  a unit  of  land.  Land  classes  are  separated  by  slope, 
which  coincides  with  the  timber  inventory  process.  The  three  land  classes  used  in  the 
Forest  Plan  are  defined  by  the  following  slope  ranges:  0 to  35  percent;  36  to  55  percent; 
and,  greater  than  55  percent. 

Landform  - an  area  of  land  that  is  defined  by  its  particular  combination  of  bedrock  and 
soils,  erosion  processes  and  climatic  influences,  the  shape  and  configuration  of  units  of 
land  which  cover  approximately  30,000  acres. 

Landing  - any  place  where  round  timber  is  assembled  for  further  transport,  commonly  with 
a change  of  method. 

Landtype  - a portion  of  the  landscape  resulting  from  geomorphic  and  climatic  processes 
with  defined  characteristics  having  predictable  soil,  hydrologic,  engineering  productivity, 
and  other  behavior.  Landtype  is  a small  unit  of  the  landform  (such  as  cirque  basin  lands) 
which  may  cover  1 -2000  acres.  Landtype  is  the  smallest  unit  that  is  mapped  on  the  Salmon 
National  Forest. 

Large  Woody  Debris  - large  logs  that  divert  floing  water  and  influence  the  scour  an 
deposition  of  sediment  in  forest  streams.  These  logs  also  provide  hiding/security  cover  for 
fish.  Large  woody  debris  is  also  left  on  the  ground  after  harvest  to  protect  regeneration  and 
soil  productivity. 

Leasable  Minerals  - coal,  oil,  gas,  phosphate,  sodium,  potassium,  oil  shale,  sulphur,  and 
geothermal  steam. 

Locatable  Minerals  - those  hardrock  minerals  which  are  mined  and  processed  for  the 
recovery  of  metals.  May  include  certain  non-metallic  minerals  and  uncommon  varieties  of 
mineral  materials  such  as  valuable  and  distinctive  deposits  of  limestone  or  silica.  May 
include  any  solid,  natural  inorganic  substance  occurring  in  the  crust  of  the  earth,  except 
for  the  common  varieties  of  mineral  materials  and  leasable  minerals. 

Long-term  Productivity  - the  redistribution  of  resources  within  the  ecosystem  into  prod- 
ucts used  by  humans. 

Long-term  Sustained  Yield  (LTSY)  - the  estimated  timber  harvest  that  can  be  maintained 
indefinitely  over  time,  once  all  stands  have  been  converted  to  a managed  state  under  a 
specific  management  intensity  consistent  with  multiple  use  objectives. 


Glossary  - 13 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  ESS 


Glossary 


M 


Mainstem  Reach  - a stream  segment  encompassing  the  primary  channel  of  a drainage 
system;  the  stream  segment  of  highest  stream  order  within  a defined  drainage  system. 

Manage  - in  this  context,  to  silviculturally  treat  a forest  so  it  will  remain  a permanently 
productive  source  of  goods  and  benefits  to  the  public.  The  managed  forest  can  be  treated 
in  one  or  a combination  of  the  following:  control  of  composition;  control  of  stand  density; 
restocking  of  unproductive  areas;  protection  and  salvage;  control  of  length  of  rotation; 
facilitating  the  harvesting,  management  and  use  of  the  forest;  and  protection  of  site  and 
indirect  benefits. 

Management  Activity  - an  activity  of  man  imposed  on  a landscape  for  the  purpose  of 
harvesting,  traversing,  transporting,  or  replenishing  natural  resources. 

Management  Area  - an  area  composed  of  aggregate  pieces  of  land  (generally  several  to 
many  analysis  areas)  to  which  a given  management  objective  and  prescriptions  are 
applied. 

Management  Concern  - an  issue,  problem,  or  a condition  which  constrains  the  range  of 
management  practices  identified  by  the  Forest  Service  in  the  planning  process. 

Management  Direction  - a statement  of  multiple  use  and  other  goals  and  objectives,  along 
with  the  associated  management  prescriptions  and  standards  and  guidelines  to  direct 
resource  management. 

Management  indicator  Species  (MSS)  - animals  or  plants  selected  for  special  attention 
in  the  Forest  Plan  or  this  document  for  one  or  more  of  three  reasons.  They  may  be: 
Emphasis  species  - species  to  be  managed  as  key  resources  on  the  basis  of  identified 
issues,  e.g.,  threatened,  endangered,  rare,  sensitive,  harvest,  or  special  interest  species; 
Indicate  special  habitat  conditions  - species  that  require  special  habitat  such  as  snags, 
riparian,  old-growth  forest  stands,  etc.;  and/or  Indicate  cumulative  forest  ecosystem 
change  - generally  species  having  large  home  ranges  and  requiring  a diversity  of  habitats. 

Management  Intensity  - a management  practice  or  combination  of  management  prac- 
tices and  associated  costs  designed  to  obtain  different  levels  of  goods  and  services. 

Management  Opportunity  - a statement  of  general  actions,  measures,  or  treatments  that 
addresses  a public  issue  or  management  concern  in  a favorable  way. 

Management  Practice  - a specific  action,  measure,  course  of  action  or  treatment. 

Management  Prescription  - management  practices  and  intensity  selected  and  scheduled 
for  application  on  a specific  area  to  attain  multiple-use  and  other  goals  and  objectives. 

Mass  Erosion  - movement  of  large  masses  of  earth  materials  in  response  to  gravity,  either 
slowly  or  quickly.  This  includes:  slumps  (rotation  of  a soil  block  with  small  lateral  displace- 
ment), debris  avalanches  (rapid,  shallow  movement  of  soil  mantle  and  rock  fragments), 


Glossary  - 14 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final!  ESS 


Glossary 


landslides  (sudden,  downslope  movement  of  earth  and  rock),  and  soil  creep  (slow,  gradu- 
al, more  or  less  continuous,  permanent  deformation  of  soil  under  gravitational  stress). 

Mass  Failure  - (also  called  wasting)  massive,  downslope  movement  of  earth  material  by 
gravity. 

Mass  Instability  - the  condition  exhibited  by  a massive  section  of  earth  suspected  of  being 
unstable  and  capable  of  mass  failure. 

Mature  Timber  - trees  have  attained  full  development,  particularly  height,  and  are  in  full 
seed  production. 

MBF  - thousand  board  feet 

Mean  Annual  Increment  of  Growth  - the  total  increase  of  girth,  diameter,  basal  area, 
height,  or  volume  of  individual  trees,  or  a stand  up  to  a given  age  divided  by  that  age. 

Mesic  - of,  pertaining  to,  or  adapted  to  an  environment  having  a balanced  supply  of 
moisture. 

Middleground  - the  space  between  the  foreground  and  the  background  in  a landscape; 
the  area  located  from  1/4  or  1/2  to  3-5  miles  from  the  viewer. 

Million  Board  Feet  (MMBF)  - a symbol  to  indicate  1,000,000  board  feet  of  wood  fiber 
volume,  either  in  log  form  or  after  conversion  into  lumber. 

MIS  - Management  Indicator  Species 

Mitigation  - action  to  avoid,  minimize,  reduce,  eliminate,  compensate,  or  rectify  the  impact 
of  a management  practice. 

MMBF  - million  board  feet 

Modification  - a Visual  Quality  Objective  meaning  man’s  activity  may  dominate  the  charac- 
teristic landscape  but  must,  at  the  same,  utilize  naturally  established  form,  line,  color,  and 
texture.  It  should  appear  as  a natural  occurrence  when  viewed  in  foreground  or  middle- 
ground. 

Mosaic  Pattern  - areas  with  trees  and  areas  without  trees  occurring  in  interrupted  se- 
quences. 

Multiple  Use  - the  management  of  all  the  various  renewable  surface  resources  of  the 
National  Forest  so  that  they  are  used  in  the  combination  that  will  best  meed  the  needs  of 
the  American  people.  The  concept  also  includes  making  the  most  judicious  use  of  the  land 
for  some  or  all  of  these  resources  or  related  services  over  areas  large  enough  to  provide 
sufficient  latitude  for  periodic  adjustments  in  use  to  conform  to  changing  needs  and 
conditions.  Some  of  the  land  will  be  used  for  less  than  all  of  the  resources.  There  should 
be  harmonious  and  coordinated  management  of  the  various  resources,  each  with  the 
other,  without  impairment  of  the  productivity  of  the  land.  Consideration  is  given  to  the 
relative  values  of  the  various  resources  and  not  necessarily  to  the  combination  of  uses  that 
will  give  the  greatest  dollar  return  or  the  greatest  unit  output. 


Glossary  - 15 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Glossary 


N 

National  Environmental  Policy  Act  (NEPA)  of  1969  - an  act  to  declare  a national  policy 
which  will  encourage  productive  and  enjoyable  harmony  between  man  and  his  environ- 
ment, to  promote  efforts  which  will  prevent  or  eliminate  damage  to  the  environment  and 
biosphere  and  stimulate  the  health  and  welfare  of  humanity,  to  enrich  the  understanding 
of  the  ecological  systems  and  natural  resources  important  to  the  nation,  and  to  establish 
a Council  on  Environmental  Quality. 

National  Forest  Management  Act  (NFMA)  - a law  passed  in  1976  as  an  amendment  to 
the  Forest  and  Rangeland  Renewable  Resources  Planning  Act  requiring  the  preparation 
of  Regional  Guides  and  Forest  Plans  and  the  preparation  of  regulations  to  guide  that 
development. 

National  Forest  Land  and  Resource  Management  Plan  - a Plan  developed  to  meet  the 
requirements  of  the  Forest  and  Rangeland  Renewable  Resources  Planning  Act  of  1 974, 
as  amended,  that  guides  all  natural  resource  management  activities  and  establishes 
management  standards  and  guidelines  for  the  National  Forest  System  lands  of  a given 
National  Forest. 

National  Forest  System  (NFS)  Lands  - National  Forests,  National  Grasslands,  or  pur- 
chase units,  and  other  lands  under  the  management  of  the  Forest  Service,  including 
experimental  areas  and  Bankhead-Jones  Title  III  lands. 

Native  Species  - a plant  or  animal  species  that  occurs  indigenously  in  an  area. 

Natural  Integrity  - one  of  the  six  roadless  area  characteristics  and  wilderness  features; 
explains  the  extent  to  which  long-term  ecological  processes  are  intact  and  operating. 
Impacts  to  natural  integrity  are  measured  by  the  presence  and  magnitude  of  human- 
induced  change  to  an  area.  Such  impacts  include  physical  developments  (e.g.  roads, 
utility  rights-of-way,  fences,  lookouts,  cabins),  recreation  developments,  domestic 
livestock  grazing,  mineral  developments,  wildlife/fisheries  management  activities,  vegeta- 
tive manipulation,  and  fire  suppression  activities. 

Natural  Opening  - a break  in  the  forest  canopy.  A naturally-occurring  area  of  bare  soil, 
grasses,  forbs,  or  shrubs  located  in  a large  area  dominated  by  trees.  Also  included  are 
created  openings  no  longer  suitable  for  timber  production. 

I 

Natural  Regeneration  - the  regeneration  or  reforestation  of  a site  by  natural  means;  it  is 
obtained  either  from  seedlings  originating  by  natural  seeding  or  from  sprouts  and  other 
plants  representing  vegetative  reproduction.  Natural  regeneration  may  or  may  not  be 
preceded  by  site  preparation. 

NEPA  - National  Environmental  Policy  Act. 

NEPA  Process  - the  procedures  followed  to  produce  a NEPA  document  (environmental 
assessment  or  environmental  impact  statement);  an  interdisciplinary  process,  mandated 
by  the  NEPA,  which  concentrates  decision-making  around  issues,  concerns,  alternatives 
and  the  effects  of  alternatives  on  the  environment. 


Glossary  - 16 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Glossary 


NFMA  - National  Forest  Management  Act  of  1976. 

No-action  Alternative  - the  most  likely  condition  expected  to  exist  in  the  future  if  current 
management  direction  were  to  continue  unchanged. 

Nongame  - species  of  animals  which  are  not  managed  as  a sport  hunting  resource, 
NTU  - nephelometric  turbidity  units  (see  WATER  TURBIDITY). 

Notice  of  Intent  (NOI)  - written  notice  published  in  the  Federal  Register  explaining  the 
intent  to  prepare  an  environmental  statement  on  a proposed  action. 

Noxious  Weed  - a plant  species  that  is  undesirable;  conflicts,  restricts,  or  otherwise 
causes  problems  with  the  management  objectives. 


o 

Objective  - a concise,  time-specific  statement  of  measurable  planned  results  that  respond 
to  pre-established  goals.  An  objective  forms  the  basis  for  further  planning  to  define  the 
precise  steps  to  be  taken  and  the  resources  to  be  used  in  achieving  identified  goals. 

Off-road  Vehicle  (OR V)  - a vehicle  such  as  motorcycle,  all-terrain  vehicle,  four-wheel  drive 
vehicle,  and  snowmobile. 

Old  growth  - an  old-growth  stand  of  trees  designated  in  the  Forest  Plan  to  be  retained  as 
it  is 

Old-growth  - a stand  of  trees  that  is  past  full  maturity  and  is  starting  to  decay;  the  last  stage 
in  forest  succession. 

Old-growth  Habitat  - habitat  for  certain  wildlife  that  is  characterized  by  overmature  conifer- 
ous forest  stands  with  large  snags  and  decaying  logs. 

Opportunity  - see  MANAGEMENT  OPPORTUNITY. 

ORV  - off  road  vehicles. 

Over-aged  or  Over-mature  Stand  - a timber  stand  that  consists  of  trees  that  have  attained 
full  development  (age  class  3-5),  particularly  in  height,  and  are  declining  in  vigor,  health, 
and  soundness. 

Overstory  - that  portion  of  the  trees,  in  a forest  of  more  than  one  story,  forming  the  upper 
or  uppermost  canopy. 


Glossary  - 17 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  E1S 


Glossary 


P 

Parent  Material  - the  underlying  rock  from  which  soil  forms  through  a variety  of  weathering 
processes.  Distinct  vegetation  communities  are  often  a function  of  corresponding  parent 
material  variations  which  influence  soil  physical  and  chemical  properties. 

Partial  Retention  - a Visual  Quality  Objective  which  in  general  means  man’s  activities  may 
be  evident  but  must  remain  subordinate  to  the  characteristic  landscape. 

Peak  Flow  - the  highest  value  of  stream  stage  or  flow  attained  during  a flood. 

Perched  Water  Table  - water  table  above  an  impermeable  bed  underlain  by  unsaturated 
rocks  of  sufficient  permeability  to  allow  movement  of  ground  water  ( Dictionary  of  Geologic 
Terms  - Revised  Edition , 1976,  Anchor  Press). 

Perennial  Stream  - a stream  which  normally  flows  throughout  the  year. 

Planning  Period  - the  length  of  time  that  a Forest  Plan  is  intended  to  be  in  effect;  in  this 
case,  10  years. 

Plant  Succession  - the  progressive  changes  in  plant  communities  toward  climax.  Succes- 
sional  stages  are  stages  or  recognizable  conditions  of  a plant  community  that  occur  during 
its  development  from  bare  ground  to  climax;  for  example,  coniferous  forests  in  the  Moyer 
Salt  area  progress  through  six  recognized  stages;  grass-forb;  shrub-seedling;  pole- 
sapling timber;  immature  timber;  mature  timber;  old-growth  timber. 

Pole  - trees  of  at  least  five  inches  in  diameter  at  breast  height  (DBH),  but  smaller  than  the 
minimum  utilization  standard  for  sawtimber. 

Pool  - a portion  of  a stream  with  reduced  current  velocity,  often  with  deeper  water  than 
surrounding  areas  and  with  a smooth  surface. 

Precommerda!  Thinning  - the  selective  felling  or  removal  of  trees  in  a young 
stand, conducted  to  accelerate  diameter  growth  on  remaining  trees,  maintain  a specific 
stocking  density,  and  improve  vigor  and  quality  of  remaining  trees;  conducted  at  an  age 
before  the  trees  are  commercially  merchantable. 

Prescribed  Fire  - intentional  application  of  fire,  of  either  planned  or  unplanned  ignitions, 
to  accomplish  certain  planned  objectives. 

Prescriptions  - management  practices  selected  and  scheduled  for  application  on  a 
specific  area  to  attain  goals  and  objectives. 

Present  Met  Value  (PNV)  - the  difference  between  discounted  benefits  and  discounted 
costs. 

Preservation  - a Visual  Quality  Objective  that  states  only  ecological  change  occurs  in  an 
area. 


Glossary  - 18 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Glossary 


Primary  Contact  Recreation  - surface  waters  which  are  suitable  for  prolonged  and  inti- 
mate contact  by  humans  or  for  recreational  activities  when  the  ingestions  of  small  quanti- 
ties of  water  is  likely  to  occur.  Such  water  include,  but  are  not  restricted  to,  those  used  for 
swimming,  water  skiing,  or  skin  diving. 

Primitive  Recreation  - a Recreation  Opportunity  Spectrum  (ROS)  designation  for  an  area 
that  is  characterized  by  essentially  unmodified  natural  environment  of  a size  or  location 
that  provides  the  opportunity  for  isolation  from  sights  and  sounds  of  people.  Motorized  use 
within  the  area  is  normally  not  permitted. 

Primitive  Roads  - roads  constructed  with  no  regard  for  grade  control  or  designed 
drainage,  sometimes  by  merely  repeatedly  driving  over  an  area.  These  roads  are  single 
lane,  usually  with  native  surfacing  and  sometimes  passable  with  4-wheel-drive  vehicles 
only,  especially  in  wet  weather,  (see  also  TWO  TRACK  ROAD) 

Programmed  Harvest  - timber  scheduled  for  harvest  for  a specific  time  period. 

Project  Area  - in  this  document,  the  specific  area  proposed  for  timber  harvest. 

Proposed  Action  - in  terms  of  the  National  Environmental  Policy  Act,  the  project,  activity, 
or  decision  that  a Federal  agency  intends  to  implement  or  undertake. 

Public  Access  - usually  refers  to  a road  or  trail  route  over  which  a public  agency  claims 
a right-of-way  for  public  use. 

Public  Issue  - a subject  or  question  of  widespread  public  interest  relating  to  management 
of  the  National  Forest  System. 

Public  Participation  Activities  - meetings,  conferences,  seminars,  workshops,  tours, 
written  comments,  response  to  survey  questionnaires,  and  similar  activities  designed  and 
held  to  obtain  comments  from  the  general  public  and  specific  publics  about  National 
Forest  System  land  management  planning. 


Q-R 


Quartzite  - a granulose  metamorphic  sandstone  rock  consisting  essentially  of  quartz;  soils 
derived  from  this  parent  material. 

Range  - land  producing  native  forage  for  animal  consumption  and  lands  that  are  revege- 
tated naturally  or  artificially  to  provide  forage  cover  that  is  managed  like  native  vegetation, 
which  are  amenable  to  certain  range  management  principles  or  practices. 

Range  Allotment  - an  area  designated  for  the  use  of  a prescribed  number  and  kind  of 
livestock  under  one  management  plan,  (see  also  ALLOTMENT  MANAGEMENT  PLAN) 


Glossary  - 19 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Glossary 


RARE  li  - Roadless  Area  Review  and  Evaluation  II. 

Rearing  Habitat  - the  river  or  stream  areas  where  juvenile  salmonids  must  find  food  and 
shelter  to  survive  for  a period  of  time. 

Reconstruction  - activities  performed  on  an  existing  road  or  other  facility  to  restore  it  to 
a specified  standard. 

Record  of  Decision  (ROD)  - a document  separate  from  but  associated  with  a final 
Environmental  Impact  Statement  which  states  the  decision,  identifies  all  alternatives, 
specifying  which  were  environmentally  preferable,  and  states  whether  all  practicable 
means  to  avoid  environmental  harm  from  the  alternative  have  been  adopted,  and  if  not, 
why  not  (40  CFR  1505.2). 

Recreation  Capacity  - the  number  of  people  that  can  take  advantage  of  the  supply  of  a 
recreation  opportunity  during  an  established  use  period  without  substantially  diminishing 
the  quality  of  the  recreation  experience  or  the  resources. 

Recreation  Opportunity  Spectrum  (ROS)  - land  delineations  that  identify  possible  combi- 
nations of  recreation  activities,  settings,  and  experience  opportunities,  from  Primitive  to 
Urban,  arranged  along  a continuum.  Classes  are  Primitive,  Semi-primitive  Non-motorized, 
Semi-primitive  Motorized,  Roaded  Natural,  Rural,  and  Urban.  These  classes  are  defined 
separately  under  their  alphabetical  headings  in  this  glossary. 

Reforestation  - the  natural  or  artificial  restocking  of  an  area  with  forest  trees. 

Regeneration  - the  renewal  of  a tree  crop,  whether  by  natural  or  artificial  means;  also  the 
young  tree  crop  (seedlings  and  saplings)  itself 

Regional  Ecosystems  - large  areas  that  encompass  many  biological  communities  and 
land  management  regimes  and  are  identifiable  by  climate,  landform,  soils,  and  landscape 
patterns. 

Regional  Forester  - the  official  responsible  for  administering  a single  Forest  Region. 

Release  - all  work  done  to  free  desirable  trees  from  competition  with  other  less  desirable 
vegetation. 

Release  Cutting  - frees  a young  stand  of  desirable  trees  not  past  the  sapling  stage  from 
the  competition  of  undesirable  trees  that  threaten  to  suppress  them.  A cleaning  is  a form 
of  release  cutting  that  removes  trees  the  same  age  as  the  young  stand.  A liberation  cutting 
is  a form  of  release  that  removes  older,  larger  trees  that  overtop  a more  desirable,  younger 
stand. 

Remoteness  - one  of  the  six  roadless  area  characteristics  and  wilderness  features  which 
is  a perceived  condition  of  being  secluded,  inaccessible,  and  out  of  the  way.  The  physical 
factors  than  can  create  "remote"  settings  include  topography,  vegetative  screening,  dis- 
tance from  human  impacts  such  as  roads  and  logging  operations  (sight  and  sound),  and 
difficulty  of  travel.  A user’s  sense  of  remoteness  in  an  area  is  also  influenced  by  the 
presence  or  absence  of  roads,  their  condition,  and  whether  they  are  open  to  motorized 
vehicles. 


Glossary  - 20 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Glossary 


Removal  Cut  (final  cut)  - the  removal  of  the  last  seed  bearers  or  shelter  trees  after 
regeneration  is  established  under  a shelterwood  method. 

Research  Natural  Area  - (also  RESEARCH  NATIONAL  AREA)  an  area  in  as  near  a natural 
condition  as  possible  which  exemplifies  typical  or  unique  vegetation  and  associated  biotic, 
soil,  geologic,  and  aquatic  features.  The  area  is  set  aside  to  preserve  a representative 
sample  of  an  ecological  community  primarily  for  scientific  and  educational  purposes; 
commercial  and  general  public  use  is  not  allowed. 

Resident  Fish  - those  species  of  fish  which  do  not  go  to  sea  to  mature. 

Residual  Stand  - the  trees  remaining  standing  after  some  event  such  as  selection  cutting. 

Responsible  Official  - the  Forest  Service  employee  who  has  been  delegated  the  authority 
to  carry  out  a specific  planning  action. 

Retention  - a Visual  Quality  Objective  specifying  that  activities  are  not  evident  to  the  casual 
forest  visitor. 

Riffle  - a shallow  section  of  a stream  with  rapid  current  and  a surface  broken  by  gravel, 
rubble,  or  boulders. 

Riparian  - of,  pertaining  to,  situated,  or  dwelling  on  the  bank  of  a river  or 
other  body  of  water. 

Riparian  Area  or  Habitat  - streams,  lakes,  ponds,  wetlands,  flood  plains,  and  their  associ- 
ated aquatic  and  riparian  ecosystems. 

Riparian  Ecosystem  - a transition  between  the  aquatic  ecosystem  and  adjacent  upland 
terrestrial  ecosystem;  identified  by  soil  characteristics  and  distinctive  vegetation  communi- 
ties that  require  free  or  unbounded  water. 

Riprap  - a quantity  of  broken  stone  for  embankments;  a foundation  or  wall  of  stones  thrown 
together  irregularly. 

Road  Maintenance  Levels  - levels  are  described  as  follows:  Level  1 - Road  normally 
closed  to  vehicle  traffic.  Level  2 - Road  open  for  limited  passage  of  traffic  but  not  normally 
suitable  for  passenger  cars.  Level  3 - Road  open  for  public  traffic  including  passenger  cars, 
but  may  not  be  smooth  or  comfortable.  Level  4 - Road  suitable  for  all  types  of  vehicles, 
generally  smooth  to  travel,  and  dust  may  be  controlled.  Level  5 - Road  is  smooth  and  dust 
free,  and  the  surface  is  skid  resistant  if  paved. 

Roaded  Natural  - Recreation  Opportunity  Spectrum  (ROS)  classification  for  trails  or  roads; 
frequency  of  contact  is  moderate  to  high  on  roads,  low  to  moderate  on  trails  and  away  from 
roads  (specific  numbers  must  be  developed  to  meet  regional  or  local  conditions.) 

Roadless  Area  Review  and  Evaluation  II  (RARE  II)  - the  national  inventory  of  roadless 
and  undeveloped  areas  within  the  National  Forests  and  Grasslands.  This  refers  to  the 
second  such  assessment,  which  was  documented  in  the  Final  Environmental  Impact 
Statement  of  the  Roadless  Area  Review  and  Evaluation,  January  1979. 


Glossary  - 21 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Glossary 


Rotation  - the  planned  number  of  years  required  to  establish  (including  the  regeneration 
period)  and  grow  timber  crops  to  a specified  condition  or  maturity  for  regeneration  harvest. 
Selected  management  prescriptions  in  the  Forest  Plan  provide  the  basis  for  the  rotation 
age. 


s 


Salmonid  - member  of  the  fish  family  salmonidae\  includes  salmon  and  trout. 

Salmonid  Spawning  Areas  - waters  which  provide  or  could  provide  a habitat  for  active 
self-propagating  populations  of  salmonid  fishes. 

Salvage  - removal  of  recently-dead  or  dying  trees  to  minimize  the  loss  of  wood  products. 

Saplings  - live  trees  less  than  5 inches  in  diameter  at  breast  height.  Young  trees. 

Sawtimber  - live  trees  that  are  nine  inches  DBH  or  larger  and  that  can  be  used  for  timber. 

Scarification  - the  process  by  which  the  upper  layers  of  soil  is  loosened  and  exposed  and 
vegetation  is  removed  that  would  hinder  seeding  development 

Scoping  - the  procedures  by  which  the  Forest  Service  determines  the  extent  of  analysis 
necessary  for  a proposed  action;  for  example,  the  range  of  actions,  alternatives,  and 
impacts  to  be  addresses,  identification  of  significant  issues  related  to  a proposed  action, 
and  establishing  the  depth  of  environmental  analysis,  data,  and  task  assignments  needed. 
External  scoping  refers  to  the  process  of  receiving  input  from  individuals  outside  the  Forest 
Service,  and  internal  scoping  refers  to  the  process  of  receiving  input  from  individuals  inside 
the  Forest  Service. 

Secondary  Contact  Recreation  - surface  waters  which  are  suitable  or  intended  to  be 
made  suitable  for  recreational  uses  on  or  about  the  water  and  which  are  not  included  in 
the  primary  contact  category.  These  waters  may  be  used  for  fishing,  boating,  wading,  and 
other  activities  where  ingestion  of  raw  water  is  not  probable. 

Sediment  - Soil  or  rock  particles  that  have  been  transported  to  stream  channels  or  other 
bodies  of  water. 

Sedimentation  - the  process  of  transporting  sediment  to  stream  channels  or  other  bodies 
of  water. 

Seed  Cut  (also  SEED  TREE  CUTTING)  - similar  to  clearcutting,  except  that  a few  of  the 
better  trees  of  the  desired  species  are  left  scattered  over  the  area  to  provide  seed  for 
regeneration. 

Seedlings  - live  trees  less  than  5 inches  in  diameter  at  breast  height.  Young  plants  grown 
from  seeds. 


Glossary  - 22 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Glossary 


Seed  Tree  - a tree  selected,  and  often  reserved,  for  seed  collection. 

Selected  Alternative  - the  alternative  recommended  for  implementation  as  the  timber  sale 
based  on  the  evaluation  completed  in  the  planning  process. 

Semi-primitive  Motorized  - Recreation  Opportunity  Spectrum  (ROS)  classification  for 
trails  or  roads  with  low  to  moderate  contact  frequency;  characterized  by  a predominantly 
unmodified  natural  environment  in  a location  that  provides  good  to  moderate  isolation  from 
sights  and  sounds  of  man  except  for  facilities  or  travel  routes  sufficient  to  support  motor- 
ized recreational  travel  opportunities  which  present  at  least  moderate  challenge,  risk,  and 
a high  degree  of  skill  testing. 

Semi-primitive  Non-motorized  - Recreation  Opportunity  Spectrum  (ROS)  classification 
for  trails  or  roads;  usually  6-15  parties  per  day  encountered  on  trails  and  6 or  less  visible 
at  campsites.  It  is  characterized  by  a predominantly  unmodified  natural  environment  of  a 
size  and  location  that  provides  a good  to  moderate  opportunity  for  isolation  from  sights 
and  sounds  of  man.  The  area  is  large  enough  to  permit  overnight  foot  travel  within  the  area, 
and  presents  opportunity  for  interaction  with  the  natural  environment  with  moderate  chal- 
lenge, risk,  and  use  of  a high  degree  of  outdoor  skills. 

Sensitive  Species  - those  plant  or  animal  species  which  are  susceptible  or  vulnerable  to 
activity  impacts  or  habitat  alterations. 

Sensitivity  Level  - a particular  degree  of  measure  of  viewer  interest  in  scenic  qualities  of 
the  landscape.  Three  sensitivity  levels  are  employed,  each  identifying  a different  level  of 
user  concern  for  the  environment. 

Level  1 - Highest  sensitivity 
Level  2 - Average  sensitivity 
Level  3 - Lowest  sensitivity 

Sheiterwood  - a method  of  regeneration  of  forest  stands  in  which  the  mature  timber  is 
removed  in  a series  of  cuttings,  which  extend  over  a relatively  short  portion  of  the  rotation, 
by  means  of  which  the  establishment  of  essentially  even-aged  reproduction  under  the 
partial  shelter  of  seed  trees  is  encouraged.  The  first  cutting  is  ordinarily  the  seed  cutting, 
and  the  last  is  the  final  cutting.  Any  intervening  cutting  is  termed  removal  cutting  (from  The 
Practice  of  Silviculture,  Smith,  1962).  (See  Appendix  H for  more  information.) 

Sheiterwood  Cuffing  - the  removal  of  all  trees  in  a series  of  two  or  more  cuts  over  a period 
of  not  more  than  30  years. 

Sidecast  Materials  - in  road  building,  the  materials  excavated  from  a hillside  and  placed 
on  the  downhill  side  to  create  a flat  terrace. 

Sight  Distance  - the  distance  at  which  90  percent  or  more  of  a deer  or  elk  is  hidden  from 
an  observer.  Hiding  cover  exists  when  90  percent  or  more  of  a standing  deer  or  elk  is 
hidden  at  a distance  of  200  feet  or  less. 

Silviculture  - the  are  and  science  of  growing  and  tending  forest  vegetation;  for  example, 
controlling  the  establishment,  composition,  and  growth  of  forests  for  specific  management 
goals. 


Glossary  - 23 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  E1S 


Glossary 


Silvicultural  System  - a management  process  whereby  forests  are  tended,  harvested,  and 
replaced,  resulting  in  a forest  of  distinctive  form.  Systems  are  classified  according  to  the 
method  carrying  out  the  fellings  that  remove  the  mature  crop  and  provide  for  regeneration, 
and  according  to  the  type  of  forest  thereby  produced. 

Site-specific  - refers  to  a specific  area  or  site;  not  intended  to  encompass  a large  area. 

Site  Productivity  - production  capability  of  specific  areas  of  land. 

Skidding  - a loose  term  for  hauling  loads  by  sliding,  not  on  wheels,  as  developed  originally 
from  stump  to  roadside,  deck,  skidway,  or  other  landing. 

Skid  Trails  - tracks  where  tractors  slide  or  pull  logs  from  the  stumps  to  the  roadside  or  log 
landings. 

Slash  - woody  material  left  after  logging,  pruning,  thinning,  brush  cutting,  or  other  man- 
agement activities.  Slash  may  also  accumulate  as  a result  of  storm,  fire  or  other  damage. 

Slope  Distance  - walking  distance  down  or  up  a slope.  Vertical  distance  is  the  elevation 
change,  and  the  horizontal  distance  is  the  "as  the  crow  flies"  distance. 

Snag  - a standing  dead  tree  at  least  6"  DBH  and  at  least  20  feet  tall. 

Soil  Compaction  - reduction  of  soil  volume  which  results  in  alteration  of  soils,  chemical  and 
physical  properties. 

Soil  Productivity  - the  capacity  of  a soil  to  produce  a specific  crop  such  as  fiber,  forage, 
etc.,  under  defined  levels  of  management.  Productivity  is  generally  dependent  on  available 
soil  moisture  and  nutrients,  length  of  growing  season,  and  compaction. 

Soil  Survey  - the  systematic  examination  of  soils  in  the  field  and  in  laboratories.  There  are 
five  classes  or  orders  of  surveys  with  order  1 being  the  most  intensive  and  order  5 being 
the  least  intensive. 

Solifluction  - the  slow  flowing  downslope  of  masses  of  rock  debris. 

Solitude  - one  of  the  six  roadless  area  characteristics  and  wilderness  features;  it  is  a 
personal,  subjective  value  defined  as  isolation  from  the  sight,  sound  and  presence  of 
others  and  the  developments  of  man.  Common  indicators  of  solitude  are  numbers  of 
individuals  or  parties  one  may  expect  to  encounter  in  an  area  during  a day,  or  the  number 
of  parties  camped  within  sight  and  sound  of  other  visitors. 

Special  Features  - those  unique  geological,  biological,  ecological,  cultural  or  scenic 
features  that  may  be  located  in  roadless  areas. 

Species  - organisms  that  successfully  reproduce  among  themselves  and  cannot  repro- 
duce successfully  with  other  organisms. 

Species  Diversity  - the  distribution  and  abundance  of  different  plant  and  animal  communi- 
ties and  species. 


Glossary  - 24 


Moyer  Sal!  Timber  Sale  Finai  EIS 


Glossary 


Species  of  Special  Concern  - a native  species  whose  population  is  low  and  limited  in 
distribution  or  has  suffered  significant  reductions  because  of  habitat  loss. 

Story  - in  silviculture,  one  level  of  a forest  stand;  for  example,  canopy,  understory,  oversto- 
ry. 

Stream  Class  - the  classification  of  streams  according  to  their  beneficial  uses.  Whole 
streams  or  parts  of  streams  can  be  classified.  One  stream  may  be  divided  into  several 
classes,  (see  also  CLASS  I STREAM,  CLASS  II  STREAM,  CLASS  ill  STREAM,  CLASS  IV 
STREAM) 

Stream  Protection  Zone  (SPZ)  - zone  bordering  both  sides  of  a stream  that  is  designed 
by  IFPA  to  protect  water  quality.  Class  I SPZ  is  the  area  encompassed  by  a slope  distance 
of  75  feet  on  each  side  of  the  ordinary  highwater  marks.  Class  I streams  are  used  for 
domestic  water  supply  or  are  important  for  the  spawning,  rearing,  or  migration  of  fish.  Such 
waters  shall  be  considered  to  be  Class  I upstream  from  the  point  of  domestic  diversion  for 
a minimum  of  1 ,320  feet  Class  II  SPZ  is  the  area  encompassed  by  a slope  distance  of  at 
least  5 feet  above  the  ordinary  high  water  mark  on  each  side  of  the  stream.  Class  II  streams 
are  usually  headwater  streams  or  minor  drainages  that  are  used  by  only  a few,  if  any,  fish 
for  spawning  or  rearing.  Their  principle  value  lies  in  their  influence  on  water  quality  or 
quantity  downstream  in  Class  I streams. 

Steelhead  - a large-sized,  silvery  anadromous  rainbow  trout. 

Structural  Diversity  - diversity  in  a forest  stand  that  results  from  layering  or  tiering  of  the 
canopy;  an  increase  in  layering  or  tiering  lends  to  an  increase  in  structural  diversity. 

Stumpage  - price  paid  for  timber;  usually  expressed  as  dollars  per  thousand  board  feet 
($/MBF). 

Subordinate  - inferior  to  or  placed  below  another  in  size,  brightness,  etc.;  secondary  in 
visual  impact. 

Substrate  - subsoil. 

Substrate  Permeability  - a measure  of  the  rate  at  which  a substrate  can  pass  water,  the 
rate  depending  on  substrate  composition  and  compaction;  the  apparent  velocity  per  unit 
of  hydraulic  gradient  expressed  in  cm/hr. 

Succession  - (see  Plant  Succession). 

Sustained  Yield  - the  achievement  and  maintenance  in  perpetuity  of  a high-level  annual 
or  regular  periodic  output  of  the  various  renewable  resources  of  the  National  Forest 
System,  without  impairment  of  the  productivity  of  the  land. 


Glossary  - 25 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  E1S 


Glossary 


T 


T & E - an  abbreviation  for  Threatened  and  Endangered  Species. 

Target  Population  - the  population  levels  of  wildlife  species  established  in  the  Forest  Plan 
that  will  be  managed  for 

Temporary  Road  - a road  that  will  be  physically  obliterated  and  seeded  after  its  primary 
use  is  completed;  for  example,  a spur  road  for  logging.  It  will  never  be  used  again. 

Thermal  Cover  - vegetation  used  by  animals  to  modify  the  adverse  effects  of  weather;  a 
forest  stand  that  is  at  least  40  feet  in  height  with  tree  canopy  cover  of  at  least  70  percent. 

Thinning  - a felling  of  trees  made  in  an  immature  stand  primarily  to  maintain  or  accelerate 
diameter  increment  growth  and  also  to  improve  the  average  form  of  the  remaining  trees 
without  permanently  breaking  the  canopy;  an  intermediate  cutting. 

Thousand  Board  Feet  (MBF)  - a symbol  to  indicate  1 000  board  feet  of  wood  fiber  volume, 
either  in  log  form  or  after  conversion  into  lumber. 

Threatened  Species  - any  species  of  plant  or  animal  which  is  likely  to  become  endan- 
gered within  the  foreseeable  future  throughout  all  or  a significant  portion  of  its  range. 

Through-cut  - in  road  building,  where  the  road  is  being  built  on  very  steep  slopes  and  on 
ridge  points,  the  road  is  created  by  excavating  the  entire  road  width. 

Through-fill  - in  road  building,  where  a road  is  being  built  across  a deep  draw  or  swampy 
area,  the  whole  road  is  made  by  placing  earth  over  the  natural  ground.  This  is  called  a 
through-fill. 

Tiering  - refers  to  the  coverage  of  general  matters  in  broader  EIS’s  (such  as  national 
program  or  policy  statements)  with  subsequent  narrower  statements  or  environmental 
analyses  (such  as  regional  program  statements  or  ultimately  site-specific  statements) 
incorporating  by  reference  the  general  discussions  and  concentrating  solely  on  the  issues 
specific  to  the  statement  subsequently  prepared. 

Timber  Base  - the  lands  within  the  Forest  that  are  capable,  available,  and  suitable  for 
timber  production  (same  as  suitable  timberland) 

Timber  Stand  Improvement  (TSI)  - measures  such  as  thinning,  pruning,  release  cutting, 
prescribed  fire,  girdling,  weeding,  etc.,  of  unwanted  trees  with  the  objective  of  improving 
growing  conditions  of  the  remaining  trees. 

Timber  Unit  - a specified  number  of  timberland  acres  marked  for  a proposed  site-specific 
timber  sale. 

Total  Soil  Resource  Commitment  - reducing  the  growing  capability  of  a site  to  0 to  40 
percent  of  its  natural  ability  for  50  years  or  more. 


Glossary  - 26 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Glossary 


Transpiration  - the  evaporation  of  water  absorbed  by  a crop  . . . and  used  directly  in  the 
building  of  plant  tissue,  in  a specified  time.  It  does  not  include  soil  evaporation  (Ven,  1 964). 

T ransportation  Corridor  - a strip  of  land  of  variable  width  designated  to  accommodate  the 
clearing  and  access  control  of  a state  or  federal  highway. 

TSI  - timber  stand  improvement. 

Turbidity  - murkiness  in  water  due  to  stirred  up  sediment. 

Two-track  Road  - primitive  road. 


u 

Understory  - the  trees  and  other  woody  species  growing  under  a more-or-less  continuous 
cover  of  branches  and  foliage  formed  collectively  by  the  upper  portion  of  adjacent  trees 
and  other  woody  growth;  the  bottom  story  of  a timber  stand,  usually  shaded  by  trees 
forming  the  overstory  or  canopy. 

Uneven-aged  Management  - the  application  or  a combination  of  actions  needed  to 
simultaneously  maintain  continuous  high-forest  cover,  recurring  regeneration  of  desirable 
species,  and  orderly  growth  and  development  of  trees  through  a range  of  diameter  or  age 
classes  to  provide  a sustained  yield  of  forest  products.  Cutting  is  usually  regulated  by 
specifying  the  number  or  proportion  of  trees  of  particular  sizes  to  retain  within  each  area, 
thereby  maintaining  a planned  distribution  of  size  classes.  Cutting  methods  that  develop 
and  maintain  uneven-aged  stands  are  single-tree  and  group  selection.  (See  Appendix  H 
for  more  information.) 

Uneven-aged  Stand  - a timber  stand  which  contains  at  least  three  age  classes  intermin- 
gled intimately  on  the  same  area  (From  The  Practice  of  Silviculture,  Smith,  1962). 

Ungulate  - hoofed  mammals;  i.e.  cattle,  sheep,  deer,  elk,  etc. 

United  States  Geologic  Survey  (USGS)  - federal  government  agency  under  the  Depart- 
ment of  Interior  responsible  for  making  topographical  maps  and  doing  geological  research 
in  the  United  States. 

USGS  - United  States  Geologic  Survey. 


V 


Vegetative  Diversity  - the  distribution  and  abundance  of  different  plant  communities  and 
species  within  the  area  covered  by  a Land  and  Resource  Management  Plan. 

View  - something,  especially  a broad  landscape  or  panorama,  that  is  looked  toward  or  kept 
in  sight;  the  act  of  looking  toward  this  object  or  scene. 


Glossary  - 27 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  ESS 


Glossary 


Viewsfaed  - everything  that  feeds  into  view  you’re  seeing  from  a specific  point;  a total 
landscape  seen  or  potentially  seen  from  specific  points  on  a logical  part  of  a travel  route 
or  water  body. 

Vista  - a confined  view,  especially  one  seen  through  a long  passage,  as  between  rows  of 
houses  or  trees.  A vista  is  often  toward,  or  focuses  upon  a specific  feature  in  the  land- 
scape. Unlike  a view,  the  vista  is  sometimes  man  created  and,  if  it  is,  thereby  subject  to 
design. 

Visual  Resource  - the  composite  of  basic  physiographic  features  and  patterns,  and  land 
use  effects  that  typify  a land  unit  and  influence  the  visual  appeal  the  unit  may  have  for 
visitors. 

Visually  Subordinate  - secondary  in  visual  impact. 

Visual  Quality  Objective  (VQO)  - a desired  level  of  excellence  based  on  physical  and 
sociological  characteristics  of  an  area;  refers  to  degree  of  acceptable  alteration  of  the 
characteristic  landscape.  VQO’s  are  Preservation,  Retention,  Partial  Retention,  Modifica- 
tion, and  Maximum  Modification.  (They  are  defined  alphabetically  in  this  glossary.) 


w 


Warm  Water  Biota  - waters  which  are  suitable  or  intended  to  be  made  suitable  for 
protection  and  maintenance  of  viable  communities  of  aquatic  organisms  and  populations 
of  significant  aquatic  species  which  have  optimal  growing  temperatures  of  above  18 
degrees  C. 

Water-barred  - in  road  building,  the  process  of  placing  water  bars  or  small  raised  bumps 
across  the  width  of  a road  for  the  purpose  of  channeling  runoff  water  off  the  road. 

Water  Quality  - refers  to  a set  of  chemical,  physical,  or  biological  characteristics  that 
describe  the  condition  of  a river,  stream,  or  lake.  The  quality  of  water  determines  which 
beneficial  uses  it  can  support.  Different  instream  conditions  or  levels  of  water  quality  are 
needed  to  support  different  beneficial  uses. 

Watershed  - all  of  the  land  that  drains  surface  water  to  a given  stream  above  a designated 
point  (usually  its  mouth);  also  called  a stream  drainage  or  drainage  basin. 

Water  Yield  - the  measured  output  of  the  Forest's  streams. 

Water  Turbidity  - a measure  of  the  extent  to  which  the  intensity  of  light  passing  through 
is  reduced  by  suspended  matter;  in  this  context,  amount  of  clearness  or  murkiness  in 
water  due  to  stirred-up  sediment. 

Wilderness  - all  lands  included  in  the  National  Wilderness  Preservation  System  by  public 
law;  generally  defined  as  undeveloped  federal  land  retaining  its  primeval  character  and 
influence  without  permanent  improvements  or  human  habitation. 


Glossary  - 28 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Glossary 


Wildfire  - any  wildland  fire  that  is  not  a prescribed  fire. 

Wildlife  Habitat  Diversity  - the  distribution  and  abundance  of  different  plant  and  animal 
communities  and  species  within  a specific  area. 

Winter  Range  - an  area  used  by  deer  and  elk  during  the  winter  months;  usually  at  lower 
elevation  and/or  south  and  west  exposures. 


X,  Y,  Z 


Yarding  - the  operation  of  hauling  timber  from  the  stump  to  a collecting  point. 


Glossary  - 29 


Index 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Index 


INDEX 

TITLE 


Air  Quality 


S-5,  1-15,  11-47,  111-31,  IV-51 


Alternatives 

Comparison  of S-29,  11-41 

Examined  in  Detail S-11,  11-3 

Dismissed  from  Detailed  Study S-6,  11-1 

Preferred  Alternative S-1 9,  11-25 

Process  Used  to  Develop 11-1 


Biological  Diversity S-5,  1-14,  111-10,  IV-19, 

Appendix  H 

Changes  Between  Draft  and  Final  EIS 1-1,  11-2,  111-1 , IV-1 

Cultural  Resources S-6,  1-16,  11-37,  48,  111-33, IV-56, 


Decision  to  be  Made 

Economics 

Employment 

Fisheries 

Insects  and  Disease 
Issues 

List  of  Preparers  . . . 


1-8 

S-4,  1-12,  11-39,  44,111-34,  IV-56 
1-11 

S-4,  1-14,  11-46,  111-7,  V-14 

IV-27 
S-3,  1-10, 

Chapter  V 


Management  Requirements 

Minerals 

Mitigation  Measures 

Monitoring 


S-23,  1-6 

S-6,  1-16,  11-47,  111-33,  IV-56 
S-23,  11-31,  Appendix  C 
S-23,  11-38 


Old  Growth 


11-43,  11-15,  19 


Public  Involvement 1-9,  Chapter  VI 

Purpose  and  Need S-2,  1-1 


Index  - 1 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Index 


TITLE 

Range S-6,  1-16,  11-48,  111-32,  IV-53 

Recreation S-5,  11-47,  111-30,  IV-50 

References  . ' Chapter  VII 

Roadless .S-3,  1-12,  11-44,  111-26,  IV-46 

Soil S-4,  1-13,  11-45,  111-1,  IV-1 

Threatened,  Endangered  & Sensitive  Species S-5,  1-14,  11-46,  111-24, IV-40 

Transportation  and  Access S-5,  1-15,  11-47,  111-32 

IV-54 

Vegetation S-3,  1-10,  11-42,  111-24,  IV-21 

Visual  Quality S-5,  1-15,  11-47,  111-30,  IV-48 

Wetlands S-4,  1-13,  11-45,  IV-1 2 

Wilderness  1-12,  11-44,  111-26,  IV-46 

Wildlife  Habitat S-3,  1-11,  11-43,  111-21,  IV-34 


Index  - 2 


Appendices 


NMFS-TES  Species  List  Concurrence  Letter  A-1 

Best  Management  Practices  for  Soil  and  Water  B-1 

Federal  Consistency  Checklist  B-2 

Evaluation  of  Wildlife  Mitigation  Measure  C-1 

Wildlife  Species  List  D-1 

Vegetation  Species  List  E-1 

Biological  Assessments 

For  Federaiiy  Listed  PSant  and  Terrestrial 
Vertebrate  Species  F-1 

For  Federally  Listed  Fish  Species  F-2 

Biological  Evaluation 

Plants  and  Terrestrial  Vertebrates  6-1 

Fish  Species  G-2 

Bioiogica!  Diversity  H-1 


; 


ij 

I 

« 

| 

4 

1 


\ 

1 


APPENDIX  A 


NATIONAL  MARINE  FISHERIES  SERVICE 
SPECIES  LIST  CONCURRENCE  LETTERS 


UNITED  STATES  DEPARTMENT  OF  COMMERCE 

National  Oceanic  and  Atmospheric  Administration 

NATIONAL  MARINE  FISHERIES  SERVICE 

ENVIRONMENTAL  & TECHNICAL  SERVICES  DIVISION 

911  NE  1 1th  Avenue  - Room  620 

PORTLAND,  OREGON  97232 

503/230-5400  FAX  503/230-5435 

F/NW03 


IViAY  1 1 1392 


Mr.  Robert  W.  Rose,  Fishery  Biologist 

U.S.  Forest  Service 

Salmon  National  Forest 

P.O.  Box  729 

Salmon,  Idaho  83467 

RE:  Moyer  - Salt  Timber  Sale;  Big  Eightmile  Timber  Sale;  Deer 

Creek  Timber  Sale 

Dear  Mr.  Rose: 

The  National  Marine  Fisheries  Service  has  reviewed  the  April  6 
and  7,  1992,  letters  and  their  attached  maps  and  data  sheets 
regarding  the  occurrence  of  threatened  and  endangered  species 
that  are  listed  under  the  Endangered  Species  Act  within  the 
subject  timber  sales.  We  appreciate  the  completeness  of  the 
information  you  provided.  Based  on  the  available  information, 
the  National  Marine  Fisheries  Service  concurs  with  your  species 
lists  that  indicate  the  occurrence  of  Snake  River  spring/ summer 
chinook  salmon  within  some  drainages  of  the  subject  timber  sales. 
We  do  not  expect  to  find  either  Snake  River  sockeye  salmon  or 
Snake  River  fall  chinook  salmon  within  the  drainages  of  the 
subject  timber  sales.  We  understand  that  the  Forest  Service  is 
preparing  a separate  biological  assessment  for  each  timber  sale 
and  that  each  Biological  Assessment  will  include  information  that 
will  add  to  the  accuracy  of  the  species  list. 

Please  contact  Edmond  Murrell,  of  my  staff,  at  (503)  230-5433  if 
you  have  questions  regarding  our  listing  concurrence. 


cc:  Lynn  Bennett  - Salmon  National  Forest 

Lois  Hill  - Salmon  National  Forest 


V 


UNITED  STATES  DEPARTMENT  OF  COMMERCE 

National  Oceanic  and  Atmospheric  Administration 

NATIONAL  MARINE  FISHERIES  SERVICE 

ENVIRONMENTAL  & TECHNICAL  SERVICES  DIVISION 

911  NE  11th  Avenue  • Room  620 

PORTLAND.  OREGON  97232 

503/230-5400  FAX  503/230-5435 


APR  1 5 if m 


APR  » 1 1993 


F/NW03 


Mr.  Gordon  Haugen 

Columbia  River  Basin/Pacf ish  Coordinator 

U.S.  Forest  Service 

P.O.  Box  3623 

Portland,  Oregon  97204 

RE:  Notice  of  Listed  or  Proposed  Species  and  Designated  or 

Proposed  Critical  Habitat  (2610/2670) 


The  National  Marine  Fisheries  Service  (NMFS)  has  reviewed  your 
March  8,  1993,  letter  (enclosed)  regarding  the  present 

distribution  of  threatened  and  endangered  species  listed  Or 
proposed  for  listing  by  NMFS  under  the  Endangered  Species  Act. 
NMFS  concurs  with  the  information  contained  in  the  table  entitled 
"Present  Distribution  of  Threatened  and  Endangered  Species"  that 
was  attached  to  your  March  8 letter. 

This  species  list  can  be  used  for  all  consultations  that  are  not 
major  construction  activities  requiring  an  environmental  impact 
statement,  in  which  case  a separate  request  for  a species  list 
would  be  necessary  pursuant  to  50  CFR  402.12.  Please  direct  any 
further  questions  regarding  this  project  to  Jeffrey  Lockwood,  of 
my  staff,  at 
(503)  231-2339. 


Sincerely 


Enclosure 


c. 


Art  1 4 'S3 


United  States 
Department  of 
Agriculture 


Forest 

Service 


Pacific 

Northwest 

Region 


P.0.  Box  3623 
Portland.  OR  97208-3623 
333  S.W.  First  Avenue 
Portland.  OR  97204 


Reply  To:  2610/2670 


Mr.  Rolland  Schmitten 
National  Marine  Fisheries  Service 
7600  Sand  Point  Way.  NE 
Seattle.  WA  98115-0700 


March  8,  1993 


Dear  Mr.  S 


itten: 


Requirements  of  30  CFR  Part  402.12(c)  call  for  federal  agencies  to  secure 
either  1.)  a current  listing  of  threatened,  endangered  or  proposed  species  and 


notice  of  listed  or  proposed  species  and  designated  or  proposed  critical 
habitat.  It  further  provides  that  the  Director  of  NMFS  shall  either  concur 
with  the  provided  list  or,  if  necessary,  revise  the  list. 

In  order  to  efficiently  meet  these  requirements  a list  of  threatened  and 
endangered  species  is  enclosed,  with  occurrence  listed  by  National  Forest. 

Each  Forest,  where  occurrence  is  indicated,  will  have  the  responsibili ty  of 
addressing  that  species  in  all  biological  evaluations  or  assessments. 

Please  review  the  enclosed  list  and,  if  you  find  it  accurate,  provide  a written 
letter  of  concurrence  as  soon  as  possible.  With  your  concurrence,  the  Forests 
will  use  this  list  for  project  level  analysis  until  March  199^.  for  projects 
not  requiring  an  Environmental  Impact  Statement  (EIS) . Forests  will  requiest  a 
species  list  from  your  office  for  all  projects  and  programs  requiring  an  EIS. 

If  you  have  questions  please  do  not  hesitate  to  call. 


Columbia  River 


designated  or  proposed  critical  habitat  from  the  NMFS,  or  2.)  provide  a written 


Basin/Pacf ish  Coordinator 


Enclosure 


Coring  For  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


w 

CJ 

-H 

u 

CJ 

CJ 

CO 

•3 

o 

u 

CJ 

h£ 

c 

a 

•3 

c 

fcj 

"3 

c 

a 

■3 

CJ 

c 

3 

_) 

C 

a 


aj  a> 
> >> 
-3  CJ 

r-*  C-* 

O' 
OJ  o 
3£  CO 

a 

c 

CO 


CO 


>> 

*-H 

3 

o 

3 

0 

"H 

3 

4-> 

T-l  X 

3 

to  O 

L 

3 0 

bO 

CO  3 

-H 

*H 

Li  JL 

3 CJ 

> 

XJ 

-H  rH 1 

3 

CL  r-< 

X> 

a 

«H 

3 Cl 

33 

a 

a 

— 

CO 

S! 

CL 

CO 

1 

>v 

rH 

3 

O 

L< 

0 

O 

o 

*H 

3 3 

XJ 

-H  -H 

<D 

CO  JL 

l. 

3 U 

hO 

33 

-H 

L 

Li  3 

3 E 

> 1 

-H  5 

XJ 

CL  CO 

3 

XJ 

3 ho 

-H 

*-*  r 

■a  -5 

33 

3 

3 L, 

*~~~^ 

co  a 

CO 

C? 

CO 

a 

Li 

a). 
> 
•H 
E CL 
E 

j->  C 
tO  O 
3 E 

•H  r— ^ 

a a 
z co 


33  e 

E > 
3 -3 
— < CL 
O 

o 


s c 

E 3 
•iJ 

to  e 

C _hi 

*3  3 

CO  3 


Lj 

3 

QJ 

3 

> 

> 

~H 

E -3 

• 

CL 

3 CL 

E CL 

XJ 

3 

3 

CO  C 

xJ  CZ 

O 

3 O 

CO  O 

£33 

—1  B 

3 E 

r-H 

Q »— 1 

•H  r-H 

CD 

rz:  o 

CD  CD 

CO 

CO 

LO  CO 

3 

e 

> 

S -3 

a)  cl 

to  3 
3 O 


L, 

Ll 

CD 

CO 

(D 

XJ 

CD 

E 

> 

CD 

u 

CD 

i-i 

> 

3 

XJ 

CD 

L, 

CD 

xJ 

CO 

CD 

r-H 

c 

CD 

CD 

XJ 

c 

•*H 

r— I 

XJ 

CD 

CD 

o 

O 

• 

C 

L-  0) 

, — „ 

CO 

CD 

O L- 

If) 

3 

-3  L, 
33  3 
E > 
3 -3 
—I  CL 
O 

o 


CO 

CJ 

T3 

-H 

£3 

L. 

a 

a 

xJ 

CD 

t-i 

C 

CD 

JC 

a 

> 

•H 

■H 

t-i 

CO 

CD 

XJ 

33 


a 

CO 

o^j 

CO 

3 

CD 

co 

- 

■H 

• 

i-i 

3C 

CL 

Li 

B 

CL 

Li 

L, 

E 

CD 

CD 

O 

3 

AJ 

XJ 

3 

XJ 

X 

O 

3 

to 

O 

13 

B 

33 

c 

E 

JD 

r— H 

•H 

**H 

rH 

•H 

CD 

Li 

JO 

CO 

L. 

co 

CO 

LJ 

-1- 

CO 

XJ 

o 


3 

-3  L, 
33  3 
E > 
3 -h 
tL  CL 
O 

o 


C3  Li 

_3  3 

a > 

3 -3 
CO  CL 


> L, 
-a  -3  m 
3 CL  J-> 
a 3 
C 33 
OO—l 
XC  B L, 

O H U 

C 3 
CO  CO  oS 


CO 
Li 
E 
> 

—l 
CL  ±J 


3 

3 

Li 

a)  c 

bo 

L,  O 
O —I 

o c 

3 

3 CJ 
•H  C/0 
33 
B 

3 - 

—I  J-> 
O 3 
U LL 


u 

v — > 

a 

f—i 

r-H 

L. 

3 

3 

r-H 

E 

rH 

CO 

E 

XJ 

r~ 

CD 

c 

33 

a 

XJ 

> 

o 

XJ 

E 

E 

2 

-rH 

o 

O 

33 

XJ 

r-H 

E 

r-H 

a 

rH 

XJ 

r-H 

<v 

Li 

CO 

-H 

a 

E 

QJ 

CD 

3 

-H 

3— 

CD 

> 

*— H 

iH 

xJ 

c 

iH 

C3 

Li 

CO 

iH 

■a 

CO 

CL 

a 

E 

— 

zz 

3 

1 

XJ 

r- 

-H 

a 

C 

XJ 

3 

z 

O 

*H 

33 

E 

r-H 

- 

z>~> 

XJ 

CJ 

Li 

U 

“H 

E 

CO 

to 

CO 

a. 

- 

CD 

XJ 

Li 

2 

rH 

QJ 

Li 

QJ 

3 

3 

QJ 

QJ 

L, 

"O 

E 

3 

-rH 

QJ 

1-1 

3 

•H 

TO 

CO 

30 

CO 

bO 

E 

3 

CL 

XJ 

a 

Li 

> 

Li 

> 

Li 

3 

• 

3 

3 

03 

E 

iH 

CO 

o 

to 

XJ 

CD 

»H 

CD 

-H 

03 

O 

• 

Li 

iH 

O 

q 

iH 

zzr. 

o 

NJ 

E 

CO 

XJ 

a 

CL 

XJ 

B 

CL 

XJ 

CL 

3 

O 

u 

CL 

o 

u 

a 

XJ 

E 

L, 

3 

QJ 

3 

3 

3 

O 

E 

CD 

T3 

o 

c 

LL 

o 

• 

33 

XJ 

3 

33 

XJ 

3 

33 

QJ 

3 

3 

XJ 

a) 

CD 

XJ 

q 

u 

E 

X 

r° 

• 

*H 

to 

O 

•H 

CO 

O 

iH 

T3 

C 

•H 

3 

03 

3 

a 

a 

H 

03 

to 

x 

L 

3 

B 

Li 

3 

B 

Li 

C 

cri 

XJ 

33 

c 

a 

33 

(D 

3 

E 

H 

E 

xJ 

iH 

<—♦ 

XJ 

f— 1 

XJ 

cd 

CJ 

o 

1— i 

3 

3 

iH 

- 

T3 

tE 

3 

H 

Cm 

CD 

CD 

CD 

CD 

CD 

Li 

3 

CO 

Li 

u 

B 

L, 

hD 

c 

E 

XJ 

TJ 

Li 

X 

CO 

CO 

o 

fc- 

< 

XJ 

o 

HH 

XJ 

3 

3 

C 

L 

E 

o 

s 

E 

- 

B 

CD 

o 

CD 

33 

“ 

E 

E 

B 

CO 

XJ 

rH 

CL 

r-H 

L 

B 

-H 

rH 

q 

CD 

E 

XJ 

CD 

9 

« 

cn 

• 

E 

tn 

XJ 

3* 

B 

bO 

Li 

rH 

-H 

E 

-X) 

3 

CrC 

E 

o 

X 

T3 

iH 

*tH 

o 

> 

3 

3 

3 

o 

E 

E 

O 

- 

C 

S 

3 

3 

3 

•H 

CO 

3L 

CD 

t 

CO 

-rH 

O 

t— 

XJ 

CD 

X 

Q) 

XJ 

r-H 

CD 

cu 

T*! 

CD 

Li 

E 

XJ 

c 

o 

r-H 

3 

CO 

o 

3 

3 

E 

XJ 

o 

o 

•H 

O 

• 

*H 

XJ 

L> 

QJ 

B 

XJ 

XJ 

r-H 

1 

r-H 

• 

XJ 

B 

rH 

o 

>1 

5—1 

3 

E 

r-H 

(—1 

3 

E 

L 

< 

CD 

CD 

CD 

B 

CD 

s: 

CD 

*H 

E 

CD 

E 

X 

CO 

CO 

r> 

3: 

CL 

Lu 

CO 

L 

XJ 

V 

CO 

s 

CD 

o 

E 

a 

a 

•u  aj  a 

3 

3 u >-> 
•h  -3  a 
33  B 
3 3 

03  33  3 

E X X 
■— ( O i— i 

o 

CO  c 

Ci*  -"—I  • 


CJ 


Li  a 
3 X 
CJ 

O J-> 
O CJ 


>> 

3 

B 


o 

3 

3 
3 
O 
03 

L, 

3 3 

QJ  > 

*H  -3 
CJ  CL 
CJ 

CL  L, 
3 CJ 


3 

3 

■3 

L 

3 

■u 

3 

33 

—I 

Li 

j-> 

3 

3 

3 


CO 


3 
3 
3L  Li 

lj  a 

3 


3 

O 

aJ 

3 

3 

3 

3 

bO 

3 • 

3 3 
3 O 
H -3 
AJ 

3 3 


AJ 

3 


3 

O 

■3 

3 

3 

aj 

3 


bo 
3 
— c 
-3 
3 


3 


03  Cu  "O 


APPENDIX  B 

BEST  MANAGEMENT  PRACTICES  FOR  SOIL  AND  WATER 
FEDERAL  CONSISTENCY  CHECKLIST 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  B1 


APPENDIX  B1 

SUMMARY  OF  SOIL  AND  WATER 
BEST  MANAGEMENT  PRACTICES  (BMP’S) 
FOR  SILVICULTURAL  ACTIVITIES 


The  following  compilation  of  best  management  practices  was  prepared  by  Betsy  Rieffen- 
berger,  Salmon  National  Forest  Hydrologist,  to  incorporate  the  April  1990  Idaho  Forest 
Practices  Act  revisions. 

This  document  is  intended  to  sen/e  as  a brief  summary  of  the  BMP's  for  silvicultural 
activities  contained  in  the  Forest  Plan  and  in  the  Idaho  Forest  Practices  Act.  Though  not 
a comprehensive  compilation  of  all  the  BMP’s  contained  in  these  documents  this  summary 
should  be  useful  for  District  personnel  involved  in  timber  sale  preparation.  The  reference 
for  the  BMP  is  contained  in  parentheses  with  the  abbreviation  for  the  Forest  Plan  (FLRMP) 
or  the  Idaho  Forest  Practices  Act  (IFPA).  Copies  of  the  Forest  Plan,  Idaho  Forest  Practices 
Act  are  located  in  the  Project  File.  Further  direction  is  also  contained  in  the  Forest  Service 
Manual  (FSM  2505.1);  a copy  is  available  for  review  at  the  Supervisor’s  Office  in  Salmon. 

1 . GENERAL  TIMBER  HARVESTING 

a.  "Conduct  nonpoint  source  activities  in  accordance  with  applicable  Best  Manage- 
ment Practices  as  referenced  in  "Idaho  Water  Quality  Standards  and  Wastewater 
Treatment  Requirements"  and  in  accordance  with  the  Forest  Service’s  soil  and 
water  conservation  practices."  (FLRMP,  pg.lV-43)  Note:  The  "Idaho  Water  Quality 
Standards  and  Wastewater  Treatment  Requirements"  reference  the  Idaho  Forest 
Practices  Act  for  applicable  BMP’s. 

b.  Treat  disturbed  areas  resulting  from  management  activities  in  the  shortest 
possible  time  to  meet  water  quality  objectives."  (FLRMP  pg.lV-46).  This  BMP  relates 
to  the  Timber  Sale  Clause  B6.6  on  Seasonal  Erosion  Control  Work.  This  states  that 
erosion  control  work  on  sale  areas  needs  to  be  kept  current. 

c.  "Uphill  cable  yarding  is  preferred.  Where  downhill  yarding  is  used,  reasonable 
care  shall  be  taken  to  lift  the  leading  end  of  the  log  to  minimize  downhill  movement 
of  slash  and  soils."  (IFPA,  Rule  3,c,iv.). 

d.  To  prevent  landslides,  fill  material  used  in  landing  construction  shall  be  free  of 
loose  stumps  and  excessive  accumulations  of  slash.  On  slopes  where  sidecasting 
is  necessary,  landings  shall  be  stabilized  by  use  of  seeding,  compaction,  riprap- 
ping, benching,  mulching  or  other  suitable  means."  (IFPA,  Rule  3,  d,iii.) 

e.  "For  each  landing,  skid  trail  or  fire  trail  a drainage  system  shall  be  provided  and 
maintained  that  will  control  the  dispersal  of  surface  water  in  order  to  prevent 
sediment  from  damaging  Class  I streams."  (IFPA,  Rule  3,  e.)  See  item  4.  below  for 
a definition  of  a Class  I stream. 


B1  - 1 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  ESS 


Appendix  B1 


2.  TRACTOR  SKIDDING  (a-c,  FLRMP  pg.lV-34) 

a.  Tractor  skidding  will  be  limited  to  the  following  percent  slopes  to  minimize  soil 
erosion. 

Quartzite  Landtypes-60%  Slopes 

Volcanic,  granitic  and  sedimentary  !andtypes~45%  Slopes,  unless  site  spe- 
cific analysis  shows  otherwise." 

b.  "Recommended  spacing  distances  for  water  bars  on  tractor  skid  trails  will  be: 


TABLE  B.1:  SKID  TRAIL  WATER  BAR  SPACING  (IN  FEET) 


Gradient  (%) 

Sediments  & 
Quartzite 

Volcanics 

Qranitics 

0-10 

200 

80 

75 

10-20 

160 

70 

65 

20-30 

110 

55 

50 

30-40 

80 

40 

35 

40-50 

60 

35 

20 

50-60 

45 

- 

- 

c.  "Ephemeral  draws  should  have  minimal  disturbance  from  timber  harvest  equip- 
ment. Crossings  and  skid  trails  should  be  at  right  angles  to  draws." 

d.  ‘Stabilize  skid  trails  and  fire  trails  whenever  they  are  subject  to  erosion,  by  water 
barring,  cross  draining,  outsloping,  scarifying,  seeding  or  other  suitable  means. 
This  work  shall  be  kept  current  to  prevent  erosion  prior  to  fall  and  spring  runoff." 
(IFPA,  Rule  3,e,i.). 

3.  TIMBER  HARVEST  IN  RIPARIAN  AREAS 

a.  "Regularly  scheduled  timber  harvest  is  not  planned  in  riparian  areas  but  limited 
harvest  may  be  appropriate."  (FLRMP  pg.lV-35).  Seek  specialist  input  to  design 
harvest  in  riparian  area  to  be  compatible  with  other  BMP’s. 

b.  "Full  suspension  yarding  will  be  required  to  convey  logs  across  all  perennial 
streams,  except  where  skidding  would  not  seriously  and  adversely  affect  water 
condition  or  fish  habitat."  (FLRMP  pg.lV-42).  Input  from  a Hydrologist  and/or  Fishery 
Biologist  should  be  obtained  to  determine  if  skidding  would  adversely  affect  water 
condition  or  fish  habitat. 

c.  "Use  directional  felling  away  from  perennial  and  intermittent  stream  channels, 
except  in  cases  where  serious  and  adverse  influences  are  not  anticipated."  (FLRMP 
pg.  IV-42). 


B1  -2 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  B1 


d.  "When  slash  disposal  is  within  riparian  zones,  it  will  be  hand  or  grapple  piled  in 
areas  above  the  high  water  mark.’  (FLRMP  pg.lV-42). 

e.  ’Broadcast  burning  and  mechanical  site  preparation  will  not  be  done  within 
perennial  riparian  zones.’  (FLRMP  pg.lV-42). 

f.  "Riparian  zones  will  be  managed  in  a manner  compatible  with  the  protection  of 
water  quality  and  fish  habitat.’  (FLRMP  pg.lV-46).  The  interpretation  of  this  BMP  is 
that  timber  harvest  in  the  riparian  zone  can  only  be  conducted  if  water  quality  and 
fish  habitat  can  be  adequately  protected. 

g.  ‘Whenever  possible  trees  shall  be  felled,  bucked,  and  limbed  in  such  a manner 
that  the  tree  or  any  part  thereof  will  fall  away  from  any  Class  I streams.  Continuously 
remove  slash  and  other  debris  that  enters  Class  I Streams  as  a result  of  harvesting 
operations.  Place  removed  material  five  feet  slope  distance  above  the  ordinary  high 
water  mark."  (IFPA,  Rule  3,f,i.). 

h.  ’Remove  slash  and  other  debris  that  enters  Class  II  streams  whenever  there  is 
a potential  for  stream  blockage  or  if  the  stream  has  the  ability  for  transporting  the 
debris  immediately  following  skidding  and  place  removed  material  above  the  ordi- 
nary high  water  mark  or  other  wise  treat  as  prescribed  by  the  department."  (IFPA, 
Rule  3,f,ii.).  See  part  4.  below  for  a definition  of  a Class  ID  stream. 

i.  Tracked  or  wheel  skidding  in  or  through  streams  shall  not  be  permitted.  When 
streams  must  be  crossed,  adequate  temporary  structures  to  carry  stream  flow  shall 
be  installed.  Cross  the  stream  at  right  angles  to  its  channel  if  at  all  possible.  Remove 
all  temporary  crossings  immediately  after  use  and,  where  applicable,  water  bar  the 
ends  of  the  skid  trails."  (IFPA,  Rule  3,g,L). 

j.  ’Provide  the  large  organic  debris  (LCD),  shading,  soil  stabilization,  wildlife  cover 
and  water  filtering  effects  of  vegetation  along  Class  I streams." 

(1)  ’Leave  hardwood  trees,  shrubs,  grasses,  and  rocks  wherever  they  afford 
shade  over  a stream  or  maintain  the  integrity  of  the  soil  near  a stream." 

(2)  "Leave  75  percent  of  the  current  shade  over  the  stream." 

(3)  "Carefully  log  the  mature  timber  from  the  Stream  Protection  Zone  in  such 
a way  that  shading  and  filtering  effects  are  not  destroyed." 

(4)  ’Standing  trees,  including  conifers,  hardwoods  and  snags  will  be  left 
within  50  feet  of  the  ordinary  high  water  mark  on  each  side  of  all  Class  I 
streams  in  the  following  minimum  numbers  per  1000  feet  of  stream:" 


Moyer  Sallt  Timber  Sale  Final  ESS 


Appendix  B1 


TABLE  B.2:  MINIMUM  STANDING  TREES  PER  1000  FEET  REQUIRED  (ON  EACH 

SIDE) 

Stream  Width 


Tree  Diameter 
(DBH)  in  inches 

Over  20  feet 

1 0 to  20  feet 

Under  10  feet 

0 to  7.9 

200 

200 

200 

8 to  11.9 

42 

42 

42 

12  to  19.9 

21 

21 

-- 

20  plus 

4 

- 

- 

(5)  'Snags  wilt  be  counted  as  standing  trees  in  each  diameter  class  if  snag  height 
exceeds  1 .5  times  the  distance  between  the  snag  and  the  stream’s  ordinary  high 
water  mark.  Not  more  than  50  percent  of  any  class  may  consist  of  snags.’ 

(6)  ’As  an  alternative  to  the  standing  tree  and  shade  requirements,  the  operator  may 
notify  the  department  that  a site  specific  riparian  management  prescription  is  re- 
quested. The  department  and  operator  may  jointly  develop  a plan  upon  considera- 
tion of  stream  characteristics  and  the  need  for  large  organic  debris,  stream  shading 
and  wildlife  cover  which  will  meet  the  objective  of  these  rules." 

(7)  "Where  the  opposite  side  of  the  stream  does  not  currently  meet  the  minimum 
standing  tree  requirements  of  the  table,  the  department  and  the  operator  should 
consider  a site  specific  riparian  prescription  that  meets  the  large  organic  debris 
needs  of  the  stream." 

(8)  "Stream  width  shall  be  measured  as  average  between  ordinary  high  water 
marks."  (IFPA,  Rule  3,g.iii.). 

4.  STREAM  PROTECTION  ZONE/FILTER  STRIP  REQUIREMENTS 

The  need  to  maintain  an  area  of  undisturbed  ground  adjacent  to  streams  to  serve  as  a 
sediment  filter  is  addressed  in  both  the  IFPA  and  the  FLRMP.  The  standard  in  the  IFPA  is 
a set  distance  for  a particular  type  of  stream  whereas  the  filter  strip  widths  recommenda- 
tions in  the  FLRMP  vary  with  parent  material,  percent  slope,  and  percent  ground  cover. 
Following  are  these  recommendations: 

IFPA  STREAM  PROTECTION  ZONE 

"Class  I Stream  Protection  Zone  means  the  area  encompassed  by  a slope  distance  of  75 
feet  on  each  side  of  the  ordinary  highwater  marks.  Class  I 

streams  are  used  for  domestic  water  supply  or  are  important  for  the  spawning,  rearing,  or 
migration  of  fish.  Such  waters  shall  be  considered  to  be  Class  I upstream  from  the  point 
of  domestic  diversion  for  a minimum  of  1 ,320  feer. 


B1  -4 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  B1 


■Class  II  Stream  Protection  Zone  is  the  area  encompassed  by  a slope  distance  of  at  least 
5 feet  above  the  ordinary  high  water  mark  on  each  side  of  the  stream.  Class  II  streams  are 
usually  headwater  streams  or  minor  drainages  that  are  used  by  only  a few,  if  any,  fish  for 
spawning  or  rearing.  Their  principle  value  lies  in  their  influence  on  water  quality  or  quantity 
downstream  in  Class  I streams'. 

Following  is  a list  from  the  IFPA  of  practices  prohibited  or  restricted  in  the  Class  I or  II 
Stream  Protection  Zones  (SPZ): 

a.  ‘On  slopes  exceeding  45%  gradient  and  which  are  immediately  adjacent  to  a 
Class  I or  II  stream,  tractor  or  wheel  skidding  shall  not  be  conducted  unless  the 
operation  can  be  done  without  causing  accelerated  erosion."  (pg.7,  Rule  3,c,i.). 

b.  'Construct  new  landings,  skid  trails,  and  fire  trails  on  stable  areas  outside  the 
appropriate  stream  protection  zone0,  (pg.8,  Rule  3,d,i,) 

c.  'When  cable  yarding  is  necessary  across  or  inside  the  SP  Zones,  it  shall  be  done 
in  such  a manner  as  to  minimize  stream  bank  vegetation  and  channel  disturbance'. 
(IFPA,  Rule  3,g,ii.). 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Safe  Final  EIS 


Appendix  B1 


FLRMP  FILTER  STRSP  GUIDELINES 

Following  are  the  filter  strip  guidelines  to  be  used  to  provide  a sediment  filter  strip  immedi- 
ately adjacent  to  streams  to  reduce  sediment  delivery  from  roads  or  other  major  surface 
disturbance. 

TABLE  B.3:  FILTER  STRIP  WIDTHS  (IN  FEET)  IN  QUARTZITE  PARENT  MATERIAL* 


Percent  Slope 


Percent 

Ground 

Cover* ** 

0 

10 

20 

30 

40 

50 

60 

70 

80 

90 

100 

20 

25 

30 

35 

45 

60 

80 

110 

165 

205 

90 

25 

40 

55 

60 

70 

85 

105 

135 

190 

230 

80 

30 

55 

60 

65 

75 

90 

110 

140 

195 

235 

70 

35 

60 

65 

70 

80 

95 

115 

145 

200 

240 

60 

40 

65 

70 

75 

85 

100 

120 

150 

205 

245 

50 

45 

70 

75 

80 

90 

105 

125 

155 

210 

250 

40 

55 

80 

85 

90 

100 

115 

135 

165 

220 

260 

30 

70 

95 

100 

105 

115 

130 

150 

180 

235 

275 

20 

100 

125 

130 

135 

145 

160 

180 

210 

265 

305 

* From  lower  edge  of  disturbed  area,  road,  or  toe  of  fill  slope  to  stream. 

**  Ground  cover  estimate  includes  live  plants  and  letter  that  can  effectively  dissipate  the 
energy  of  raindrops  before  they  hit  the  soil.  Surface  rock  is  not  included  in  this  estimate. 


B1  - 6 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  B1 


TABLE  B.4:  FILTER  STRIP  WIDTHS  (IN  FEET)  IN  GRANITIC,  VOLCANIC  AND 
SEDIMENTARY  PARENT  MATERIAL* 


Percent  Slope 


Percent 

Ground 

Cover** 

0 

10 

20 

30 

40 

50 

60 

70 

80 

90 

100 

30 

45 

50 

55 

75 

90 

110 

150 

205 

245 

90 

45 

60 

75 

90 

100 

125 

145 

175 

230 

270 

80 

50 

75 

90 

95 

105 

130 

150 

180 

235 

275 

70 

55 

90 

95 

100 

120 

135 

155 

185 

240 

280 

60 

70 

95 

100 

115 

125 

140 

160 

190 

245 

285 

50 

75 

100 

115 

120 

130 

145 

165 

195 

250 

290 

40 

85 

120 

125 

130 

140 

155 

175 

205 

260 

300 

30 

110 

135 

140 

145 

155 

170 

190 

220 

275 

315 

20 

140 

165 

170 

175 

185 

200 

220 

250 

305 

345 

* From  lower  edge  of  disturbed  area,  road,  or  toe  of  fill  slope  to  stream. 

**  Ground  cover  estimate  includes  live  plants  and  letter  that  can  effectively  dissipate  the 
energy  of  raindrops  before  they  hit  the  soil.  Surface  rock  is  not  included  in  this  estimate. 


To  ensure  compliance  with  both  the  FLRMP  and  the  SFPA  a minimum  SPZ  of  75  feet  should 
be  used  for  all  perennial  streams.  The  State  of  Idaho  has  interpreted  the  definition  of  a 
Class  I stream  to  be  virtually  all  perennial  streams.  Where  the  Forest  Plan  recommends  a 
filter  strip  width  greater  than  75  feet,  than  this  distance  should  be  used.  Class  II  streams 
have  been  interpreted  by  the  State  as  any  stream  having  discernible  bed  and  banks, 
whether  or  not  they  are  flowing  water  at  the  time  of  logging.  Essentially  all  intermittent  and 
some  ephemeral  streams  would  come  under  this  definition.  Recommendations  on  the 
appropriate  width  of  the  filter  strip  or  SPZ  will  be  determined  at  the  project  level. 

5.  ROAD  CONSTRUCTION 

a.  Timber  harvest,  road  construction,  mining,  range  revegetation  and  similar  activi- 
ties which  have  a significant  soil  disturbing  impact  will  not  be  permitted  on  lands 
identified  in  the  soil  resource  inventories  as  exhibiting  high  mass  stability  hazard. 
These  activities  will  be  permitted  on  lands  identified  in  soil  resource  inventories 
exhibiting  moderate  mass  stability  hazard  only  if  it  can  be  shown  that  a design  can 
satisfactorily  mitigate  or  prevent  potential  soil  movement.0  (FLRMP,  Pg.lV-43). 


B1  -7 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  ESS 


Appendix  B1 


b.  "Avoid  channelization  of  natural  streams.  Where  channelization  is  necessary  for 
flood  control  or  other  purposes,  use  stream  geometry  relationships  to  re-establish 
meanders,  width/depth  ratios,  ets.,  consistent  with  each  major  stream  type." 
(FLRMP,  pg.lV-46). 

c.  "Create  artificial  sediment  traps  with  barriers  where  the  natural  vegetation  is 
inadequate  to  protect  any  waterway  or  lake  from  significant  accelerated  sedimenta- 
tion." (FLRMP,  pg.lV-64). 

d.  "Minimize  detrimental  disturbance  to  the  riparian  area  by  construction  activities. 
Initiate  timely  and  effective  rehabilitation  of  disturbed  areas  and  restore  riparian 
areas  so  that  a vegetative  ground  cover  or  suitable  substitute  protects  the  soil  from 
erosion  and  prevents  increased  sediment  yield.”  (FLRMP,  pg.lV-64). 

e.  "Roads  and/or  road  sections  will  be  surfaced  when  serious  and  adverse  effects 
from  erosion  and  sedimentation  are  anticipated."  (FLRMP,  pg.lV-64). 

f.  "Excavated  material  from  road  building  should  be  end  hauled  if  there  is  any 
potential  of  a significant  amount  of  sidecast  materia!  entering  a stream."  (FLRMP, 
pg.lV-64). 

g.  ‘Stream  crossing  structures  will  be  designed  and  constructed  in  a manner 
avoiding  serious  and  adverse  affects  on  fish  habitat  and  passage." 
(FLRMP,  pg.IV-64). 

h.  "Bridge  and  culvert  projects  which  are  expected  to  result  in  detrimental  stream 
channel  modifications  (i.e.,  gradient,  width,  and  bank  or  bed  stability)  beyond  the 
immediate  project  area  will  not  be  permitted.”  (FLRMP,  pg.IV-64). 

i.  "Plan  each  road  to  the  minimum  use  standards  adapted  to  the  terrain  and  soil 
materials  to  minimize  disturbances  and  damage  to  forest  productivity,  water  quality, 
and  wildlife."  (IFPA,  Rule  4,b.). 

j.  "Plan  transportation  networks  to  minimize  road  construction  within  stream  protec- 
tion zones.  Design  to  leave  or  reestablish  areas  of  vegetation  between  roads  and 
streams.”  (IFPA,  Rule  4,b,i.). 

k.  "Plan  minimum  cuts  and  fills  particularly  near  stream  channels."  (IFPA,  Rule 
4,b,ii.). 

l.  "Plan  roads  to  drain  naturally  by  outsloping  or  insioping  with  cross-drainage  and 
by  grade  changes  where  possible.  Plan  dips,  water  bars,  and/or  cross-drainage  on 
roads  when  necessary."  (IFPA,  Rule  4,b,iv.). 

m.  "Relief  culverts  and  roadside  ditches  shall  be  planned  whenever  reliance  upon 
natural  drainage  would  not  protect  the  running  surface,  excavation  or  embankment. 
Design  culvert  installations  to  prevent  erosion  of  the  fill.  Plan  drainage  structures  to 
achieve  minimum  direct  discharge  of  sediment  to  streams."  (IFPA,  Rule  4,b,v.). 

n.  "Construct  cross  drains  and  relief  culverts  to  minimize  erosion  of  embankments. 
Minimize  the  time  between  construction  and  installation  of  erosion  control  devices. 


B1  - 8 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  B1 


Use  riprap,  vegetative  matter,  downspouts  and  similar  devices  to  minimize  erosion 
of  the  fill.  Install  drainage  structures,  or  cross  drain  uncompleted  roads  which  are 
subject  to  erosion  prior  to  fall  or  spring  runoff.  Install  relief  culverts  with  a minimum 
grade  of  1 percent/  (IFPA,  Rule  4,c,ix.). 

o.  "Where  exposed  material  (excavation,  embankment,  borrow  pits,  waste  piles, etc.) 
is  potentially  erodible,  and  sediments  would  enter  streams,  stabilize  prior  to  fall  or 
spring  runoff  by  seeding,  compacting,  riprapping,  benching,  mulching  or  other 
suitable  means."  (IFPA,  Rule  4,c,iii.). 

p.  "Construct  stream  crossings  in  compliance  with  minimum  standards  for  stream 
channel  alterations  under  the  provisions  of  title  42,  chapter  38,  Idaho  Code."  (IFPA, 
Rule  3,c,vi.). 

6.  ROAD  MAINTENANCE 

a.  ‘Conduct  regular  preventive  maintenance  operations  to  avoid  deterioration  of  the 
roadway  surface  and  minimize  disturbance  and  damage  to  forest  productivity, 
water  quality,  and  fish  and  wildlife  habitat. 

(1)  Sidecast  all  debris  and  slide  material  associated  with  road  maintenance 
in  a manner  to  prevent  their  entry  into  streams. 

(2)  Repair  and  stabilize  slumps,  slides,  and  other  erosion  features  causing 
stream  sedimentation."  (IFPA,  Rule  4,d,i  & ii.). 

b.  "During  and  upon  completion  of  seasonal  operations,  the  road  surface  shall  be 
crowned,  outsloped,  insloped  or  water  barred,  and  berms  removed  from  the  outside 
edge  except  those  intentionally  constructed  for  protection  of  fills."  (IFPA,  Rule 
4,d,iii,b.). 

c.  "If  road  oil  or  other  surface  stabilizing  materials  are  used,  apply  them  in  such  a 
manner  as  to  prevent  their  entry  into  streams."  (IFPA,  Rule  4,d,  iii,d.). 

d.  ‘Inactive  roads.  An  inactive  road  is  a forest  road  no  longer  used  for  commercial 
hauling  but  maintained  for  access  (e.g.,  for  fire  control,  forest  management  activi- 
ties, recreational  use  etc..).  Following  termination  of  active  use,  ditches  and  culverts 
shall  be  cleared  and  the  road  surface  shall  be  crowned,  outsloped  or  insloped, 
water  barred  or  otherwise  left  in  a condition  to  minimize  erosion.  Drainage  struc- 
tures will  be  maintained  thereafter  as  needed."  (IFPA,  Rule  4,d,iv,). 

e.  "Abandoned  Roads.  An  abandoned  road  is  not  intended  to  be  used  again.  No 
subsequent  maintenance  of  an  abandoned  road  is  required  after  the  following 
procedures  are  completed: 

(1)  The  road  is  left  in  a condition  suitable  to  control  erosion  by 
outsloping, water  barring,  seeding,  or  other  suitable  methods. 

(2)  The  ditches  are  cleaned. 

(3)  The  road  is  blocked  to  vehicular  traffic."  (IFPA,  Rule  4,d,v.). 


B1  -9 


. 


' 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  B2 


APPENDIX  B2 

FEDERAL  CONSISTENCY  CHECKLIST 


1.  Have  you  identified  which  nonpoint  source  activities  regulated  by  the  Idaho  Water 
Quality  Standards  are  within  the  the  project  area? 

ANSWER:  Nonpoint  source  activities  within  the  project  area  include  road  construction, 
timber  harvesting,  site  preparation,  reforestation,  thinning, 
and  prescribed  burning. 


2.  Have  you  identified  the  state  approved  BMP’s  for  each  nonpoint  source  activity? 

ANSWER:  Following  are  the  State  of  Idaho  approved  BMP’s  for  the  proposed 
activities. 

1 . Rules  and  Regulations  pertaining  to  the  Idaho  Forest  Practices  Act. 

2.  Rules  and  Regulations  pertaining  to  the  Idaho  Stream  Channel  Protection 

Act. 

3.  Best  Management  Practices  for  Road  Activities,  August,  1982.  (the  Forest 
Service  agreed  to  implement  these  in  the  Nonpoint  Source  MOU). 

In  addition,  site-specific  BMP’s  or  mitigation  measures  are  identified  in  Chapter  2. 


3.  For  nonpoint  source  activities  which  do  not  have  approved  BMP’s,  have  you  identified 
practices  that  demonstate  a knowledgeable  and  reasonable  effort  to  minimize  resulting 
water  quality  impacts? 

ANSWER:  All  of  the  proposed  nonpoint  source  activities  have  approved  BMP’s. 


4.  Have  you  provided  a monitoring  plan  which,  when  implemented  will  provide  adequate 
information  to  determine  the  effectiveness  of  the  approved  or  specialized  BMP’s  in  protect- 
ing the  beneficial  uses  of  water? 

ANSWER:  Yes.  See  Chapter  2,  Water  Quality  and  Fisheries  Project  Monitoring. 

In  addition  the  timber  sale  administrator  will  be  conducting  BMP  implementation 
monitoring  to  ensure  that  the  BMP’s  and  mitigation  measures  specified  in  the 
FEIS  have  been  implemented  on  the  project.  During  road  construction  the 
Engineering  Representative  will  conduct  BMP  implementation  monitoring  to 
ensure  that  the  BMP’s  specified  for  the  road  construction  have  been  imple- 
mented on  the  project. 


5.  Have  you  provided  a process  (including  feedback  from  water  quality  monitoring)  for 
modifying  the  approved  or  specialized  BMP’s  in  order  to  protect 


B2  - 1 


Moyer  8@Bt  Timber  Sal®  Final  EIS  Appendix  B2 


beneficial  uses  of  water? 

ANSWER:  Yes,  the  Salmon  National  Forest  Hydrologist  and  Soil  Scientist  conduct 
annual  BMP  audits  on  the  Forest.  During  these  audits  the  implemented 
BMP’s  are  evaluated  for  their  effectiveness.  Recommendations  to  modify 
or  change  the  BMP’s  or  implement  additional  ones  are  then  made  to  the 
responsible  line  officer  if  necessary.  Future  hydrologic  input  to 
projects  with  nonpoint  source  activities  is  enhanced  as  a result  of  the 
BMP  audits  conducted  on  the  Forest. 


6.  Have  you  listed  the  "appropriate  beneficial  and  existing  uses"  of  water  for  the  waterbod- 
ies in  the  project  area? 

ANSWER:  Yes.  See  Chapter  3,  Hydrology,  Existing  Condition. 


7.  Have  you  determined  if  a Stream  Segment  of  Concern  (SSOC)  has  been 
designated  within  the  project  area? 

ANSWER:  There  are  no  Stream  Segments  of  Concern  within  the  analysis  area. 


8.  Have  you  determined  if  an  Outstanding  Resource  Water  has  been  designated 
within  the  project  area? 

ANSWER:  There  are  none. 


9.  Have  you  identified  the  Water  Quality  Standards  and  criteria  applicable  to 
protect  the  appropriate  beneficial  uses? 

ANSWER:  The  water  quality  standards  specified  in  Water  Quality  Standards  and 
Wastewater  Treatment  Requirements  (IDAPA  16.01.2000)  will  be  followed. 


1 0.  Does  pre-project  planning  and  design  include  an  analysis  of  water  quality 
resulting  from  implementation  of  the  proposed  activity  sufficient  to  predict  exceedance  of 
water  quality  criteria  for  the  appropriate  beneficial  use(s) 
or  in  the  absence  of  such  criteria,  sufficient  to  predict  the  potential  for 
beneficial  use  impairment? 

ANSWER:  Yes.  BQISED  model  runs  and  in-stream  inventories  were  used  to  analyze  water 
quality.  A soil  scientist  and  hydrologist  were  involved  in  pre-project  planning  and  design 
to  assure  that  standards  would  be  met. 


B2-2 


APPENDIX  C 


EVALUATION  OF  WILDLIFE  MITIGATION  MEASURE 


Forest 

Service 


Salmon  NF 


United  States 
Department  of 
Agriculture 


Reply  To: 
Subject : 


To: 


2430/2620  Date: 


Moyer  Salt  EIS  Wildlife  Mitigation  Measure; 


District  Ranger,  Cobalt  RD 


February  9,  1992 


The  following  table  was  prepared  to  help  evaluate  the  road  slash  mitigation 
measure  that  applies  to  all  action  alternatives  except  number  five 
(Helicopter)  in  the  Moyer  Salt  EIS. 


| ALTERNATIVES 

1 

1 

| 

2 & 2A 

3 

1 

I 

4 

1 

| 

5 

1 6 
1 

| Without  Slash 
| Road  Density 

0 

1 

1 

1 

1.46 

2.25 

1 

1 

1 

1.0 

1 

1 

1 

0 

1 

1 

| 1.0 

C : F 

| 32:68 

1 

27:73 

27  : 73 

1 

26:74 

1 

29  : 71 

| 27:73 

| EHE 

| 68% 

1 

| 

34% 

34% 

1 

| 

27% 

1 

| 

55% 

| 34% 

jwith  Slash 

Road  Density 

0 

1 

1 

1 

0 

0 

1 

1 

1 

0 

1 

1 

I 

0 

1 

1 

0 

j C : F 

| 32:68 

1 

27  : 73 

27:73 

1 

26:74 

1 

29  : 71 

j 27:73 

| EHE 

1 68% 

| 

40% 

40% 

| 

32% 

I 

55% 

1 40% 

1 Change  in  EHE 

1 NA 

1 

X 

+ 15% 

+ 15% 

1 

+ 16% 

1 

_L 

NA 

1 

1 +15% 

For  comparison  purposes,  these  calculations  were  based  upon  a 2400  acre 
portion  of  the  total  analysis  area.  This  area  was  centered  around  Units  21 
through  30  and  S1-S10  and  included  portions  of  Wildlife  Analysis  Area  I 
and  II.  Roads  that  received  slash  to  prevent  human  access  were  assumed  to 
be  "removed"  from  the  road  base  (i.e.,  the  area  was  treated  as  if  it  were 
unroaded) . 


C.  RICHARD  WENGER 
Forest  Wildlife  Biologist 


CRWenger : crw : sh 


Caring  for  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200-28b(3/92) 


APPENDIX  D 

WILDLIFE  SPECIES  LIST 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  D 


APPENDIX  D 

VERTEBRATE  SPECIES  LIST 

WILDLIFE  SPECIES  THAT  OCCUR  IN  OR  WHOSE  HABITAT  OCCURS 
IN  THE  MOYER  SALT  ANALYSIS  AREA 


MAMMALS 

Residents 
Masked  Shrew 
Merriam  Shrew 
Vagrant  Shrew 
Little  Brown  Myotis 
Long-eared  Myotis 
California  Myotis 
Yuma  Myotis 
Long-legged  Myotis 
Western  Pipistrel 
Big  Brown  Bat 
Small-footed  Myotis 
Western  Big-eared  Bat 
Spotted  Bat 
Red  Squirrel 
Northern  Flying  Squirrel 
Northern  Pocket  Gopher 
Ord  Kangaroo  Rat 
Deer  Mouse 
Bushy-tailed  Wood  Rat 
Wolverine 
Striped  Skunk 
Grey  Wolf 
Longtail  Vole 
Sagebrush  Vole 
Western  Jumping  Mouse 
Pika 

Snowshoe  Hare 
Black  Bear 
Pine  Marten  * 

Longttail  Weasel 
River  Otter 

Migrant 
Hoary  Bat 

AMPHIBIANS 

Mountain  Lion 

Lynx 

Bobcat 

Yellowbelly  Marmot 
Columbian  Ground  Squirrel 
Golden-mantled  Squirrel 
Least  Chipmunk 
Yellow  Pine  Chipmunk 
Mountain  Cottontail 
Pygmy  Rabbit 
Elk  * 

Mule  Deer  * 

Mountain  Phenacomys 
Boreal  Redback  Vole 
Montane  Vole 
Great  Basin  Pocket  Mouse 
Beaver 

Northern  Grasshopper  Mouse 
Mountain  Goat  * 

Badger 

Coyote 

Red  Fox 

Richardson  Vole 

House  Mouse 

Porcupine 

Whitetail  Jackrabbit 

Redtail  Chipmunk 

Raccoon 

Shorttail  Weasel 

Mink 

Long-toed  Salamander 
Tailed  Frog 
Pacific  Tree  Frog 

Tiger  Salamander 
Western  Toad 
Spotted  Frog 

D - 1 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  D 


REPTILES 
Western  Skink 

Western  Yellow-bellied  Racer 
Common  Garter  Snake 
Western  Rattlesnake 

BIRDS 

Residents 

Great  Blue  Heron 

Sharp-shinned  Hawk 

Red-tailed  Hawk 

Marsh  Hawk 

American  Kestrel 

Spruce  Grouse 

Sage  Grouse 

Common  Snipe 

Screech  Owl 

Pygmy  Owl 

Red-shafted  Flicker 

Hairy  Woodpecker 

Northern  Three-toed  Woodpecker 

Grey  Jay 

Black-billed  Magpie 
Common  Crow 
Black-capped  Chickadee 
Red-breasted  Nuthatch 
Dipper 

Townsend’s  Solitaire 
Starling 

Red-winged  Blackbird 
House  Finch 

Grey-crowned  Rosy  Finch 
Pine  Siskin 
Red  Crossbill 
Song  Sparrow 

Summer  Residents 
Mourning  Dove 
Short-eared  Owl 
Common  Nighthawk 
Black-chinned  Hummingbird 
Rufous  Hummingbird 
Lewis’  Woodpecker 
Williamson’s  Sapsucker 
Western  Kingbird 
Hammond’s  Flycatcher 
Western  Flycatcher 
Olive-sided  Flycatcher 
Tree  Swallow 


Rubber  Boa 

Great  Basin  Gopher  Snake 
Western  Terrestrial  Garter  Snake 


Goshawk  * 

Cooper’s  Hawk 
Golden  Eagie 
Prairie  Falcon 
Blue  Grouse 
Ruffed  Grouse 
Mountain  Chickadee 
Rock  Dove 
Great  Horned  Owl 
Great  Grey  Owl  * 
Pileated  Woodpecker 
Downy  Woodpecker 
Horned  Lark 
Steller’s  Jay 
Common  Raven 
Clark’s  Nutcracker 
White-breasted  Nuthatch 
Brown  Creeper  * 

Robin 

Golden-crowned  Kinglet 
House  Sparrow 
Evening  Grosbeak 
Pine  Grosbeak 
Black  Rosy  Finch 
American  Goldfinch 
Dark-eyed  Junco 


Flammulated  Owl 
Saw-whet  Owl 
White-throated  Swift 
Broad-tailed  Hummingbird 
Calliope  Hummingbird 
Yellow-bellied  Sapsucker  * 
Eastern  Kingbird 
Alder  Flycatcher 
Ducky  Flycatcher 
Western  Wood  PeeWee 
Violet-green  Swallow 
House  Wren 


D 


2 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  D 


Summer  Residents,  continued 

Winter  Wren 

Sage  Thrasher 

Hermit  Thrush 

Veery 

Mountain  Bluebird  * 

Water  Pipit 
Solitary  Vireo 
Orange-crowned  Warbler 
Yellow  Warbler  * 

MacGillivray’s  Warbler 
Wilson’s  Warbler 
Northern  Oriole 
Brown-headed  Cowbird 
Black-headed  Grosbeak 
Purple  Finch 
Green-tailed  Towhee 
Savannah  Sparrow 
Sage  Sparrow 
Brewer’s  Sparrow 
Fox  Sparrow 

Migrants 

Ferruginous  Hawk 
Long-eared  Owl 
Black  and  White  Warbler 
Townsend’s  Warbler 
Lark  Sparrow 

Winter  Visitors 
Rough-legged  Hawk 
Bald  Eagle 
Northern  Shrike 
Common  Redpoll 
Tree  Sparrow 

FISH 

Anadromous  Species 
Steelhead  Trout 

Resident  Species 
Rainbow  (red  band)  Trout 
Mountain  Whitefish 


Grey  Catbird 
Varied  Thrush 
Swainson’s  Thrush 
Western  Bluebird 
Ruby-crowned  Kinglet  * 
Cedar  Waxwing 
Red-eyed  Vireo 
Nashville  Warbler 
Yellow-rumped  Warbler 
Yellowthroat 
Western  Meadowlark 
Brewer’s  Blackbird 
Western  Tanager 
Lazuli  Bunting 
Cassin’s  Finch 
Rufous-sided  Towhee 
Vesper  Sparrow  * 
Chipping  Sparrow 
White-crowned  Sparrow 
Lincoln’s  Sparrow 


Band-tailed  Pigeon 
Say’s  Phoebe 

Black-throated  Grey  Warbler 
Northern  Waterthrush 
Harris’  Sparrow 


Merlin 

Bohemian  Waxwing 
Loggerhead  Shrike 
White-winged  Crossbill 
Snow  Bunting 


Chinook  Salmon 


Bull  Trout 
Sculpin 


* Salmon  National  Forest  Management  Indicator  Species 


APPENDIX  E 

VEGETATION  SPECIES  LIST 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Appendix  E 


APPENDIX  E 


VEGETATION  SPECIES  LIST  FOR  THE  MOYER-SALT  TIMBER  SALE  ANALYSIS  AREA 


DOUGLAS-FIR/PINEGRASS  HABITAT  TYPE  (PSME/CARU) 


TREES 

Subalpine  fir  {Abies  lasiocarpa) 
Engelmann  spruce  (P/'cea  engelmannii) 
Whitebark  pine  ( Pinus  albicaulis) 
Lodgepole  pine  ( Pinus  contorta) 
Quaking  aspen  (Populus  tremuloides) 
Douglas-fir  (Pseudotsuga  mensiesii) 


SHRUBS  and  SUBSHRUBS 
Mountain  maple  {Acer  glabrum) 

Western  serviceberry  {Ameianchier  alnifolia 
Bearberry  or  kinnikinnick  {Arctstaphylos  uva-ursi 
Big  sagebrush  {Artemisia  tridentata) 

Oregon  grape  {Berberis  repens) 

Showbrush  ceanothus  ( Ceanothus  velutinus) 
Common  juniper  {Juniperus  communis) 

Utah  honeysuckle  ( Lonicera  utahensis) 

Ninebark  ( Physocarpus  malvaceus) 

Bitterbrush  {Purshia  tridentata) 

Squaw  currant  {Ribes  cereum) 

Prickly  currant  {Ribes  lacustre) 

Sticky  currant  {Ribes  viscosissimum) 

Wood’s  rose/wild  rose/  pearhip  rose  ( Rosa  woodsii ) 
Scouler’s  willow  {Salix  scouleriana) 

Buffalo  berry  {Shepherdia  canadensis) 

White  spirea  {Spiraea  betulifolia 

Mountain  snowberry  {Symphoricarpos  oreophilus) 

Grouse  whortleberry  {Vaccinium  scoparium) 


GRAMINOIDS 

Bluebunch  wheatgrass  {Agropyron  spicatum) 
Pinegrass  {Calamagrostis  rubescens) 
Northwestern  sedge  {Carex  concinnoides) 
Elk  sedge  {Carex  geyeri) 

Ross’s  sedge  {Carex  rossii) 

Idaho  fescue  {Festuca  idahoensis) 

Wheeler  bluegrass  (Poa  nervosa) 

Western  needlegrass  {Stipa  occidentalis) 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  ESS 


Appendix  E 


VEGETATION  SPECIES  LIST  FOR  THE  MOYER-SALT  TIMBER  SALE  ANALYSIS  AREA 


FORBS 

Common  yarrow  (Achillaea  millefollium) 

Rose  pussytoes  {Antennaria  microphylla) 
Pussytoes  (/Antennaria  racemosa) 

Arenaria  or  sandwort  (Arenaria  macrophylla) 
Heartleaf  arnica  (/Arnica  cordifolia ) 

Showy  aster  (Aster  conspicuus ) 

Arrowleaf  balsamroot  ( Balsamorphiza  sagittata) 
Common  Indian  paintbrush  ( Castilleja  miniata) 
Hawksbeard  ( Crepis  accuminata) 

Fireweed  (Epilobium  angustifolium) 

Wild  strawberry  ( Fragaria  vesca) 

Wild  strawberry  ( Fragaria  Virginia) 

Sticky  geranium  ( Geranium  viscosissimum) 
Mountain  avens  ( Geum  triflorum) 

Rattlesnake  plantain  ( Goodyera  oblongifolia) 
Hawkweed  ( Hieracium  albifiorum) 

Silver  lupine  (Lupinus  argenteus) 

Mountain  sweet-root  ( Osmorhiza  chilensis) 
Blunt-fruited  sweet-root  ( Ormorhiza  depauperata) 
Wilcox’s  penstemon  ( Penstemon  wilcoxii) 
Silverleaf  phacelia  ( Phaceiia  hastata) 

Slender  cinquefoil  ( Potentilla  gracilis) 

Side-bells  pyrola  or  wintergreen  ( Pyrola  secunda) 
Groundsel  ( Senecio  streptanthifolius) 

False  Solomon’s  seal  (Smilacina  racemosa) 
Alpine  goldenrod  ( Solidago  multiradiata) 

Western  meadowrue  (Thalictrum  occidentalis) 
Blue  violet  ( Viola  adunca) 

Yellow  violet  ( Viola  nuttallii) 

Goosefoot  violet  ( Viola  purpurea) 

Beargrass  (Xerophyllum  tenax) 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Appendix  E 


VEGETATION  SPECIES  LIST  FOR  THE  MOYER-SALT  TIMBER  SALE  ANALYSIS  AREA 


SUBALPINE  FIR  HABITAT  TYPES  (ABLA/CARU,  ABLA/VASC,  ABLA/ALS!) 


TREES 

Subalpine  fir  (Abies  lasiocarpa) 
Engelmann  spruce  ( Picea  engelmannii) 
Whitebark  pine  (Pinus  albicaulis) 
Lodgepole  pine  ( Pinus  contorta ) 
Quaking  aspen  ( Populus  tremuloides) 
Douglas-fir  ( Pseudotsuga  menziesii) 


SHRUBS  and  SUBSHRUBS 
Mountain  alder  (A/nus  sinuata) 

Western  serviceberry  (Amelanchier  alnifolia) 

Big  sagebrush  (Artemisia  tridentata) 

Oregon  grape  ( Berberis  repens) 

Snowbrush  ceanothus  ( Ceanothus  velutinus) 
Common  juniper  (Juniperus  communis) 

Labrador  tea  ( Ledum  glandulosum) 

Utah  honeysuckle  ( Lonicera  utahensis) 

Squaw  currant  ( Ribes  cereum) 

Mountain  gooseberry  ( Ribes  montigenum) 

Sticky  currant  ( Ribes  viscosissimum) 

Scouler’s  willow  (Salix  scouleriana) 

Mountain-ash  ( Sorus  scopulina) 

White  spirea  (Spiraea  betuiifolia) 

Mountain  snowberry  (Symphoricarpos  oerophilus) 
Dwarf  huckleberry  ( Vaccinium  caespitosum) 

Blue  huckleberry  ( Vaccinium  globulare) 

Grouse  whortleberry  (Vaccinium  scoparium) 


GRAMINOIDS 

Common  brome  ( Bromus  vulgaris) 
Bluejoint  ( Calamagrostis  canadensis) 
Pinegrass  ( Calamagrostis  rubescens) 
Northwestern  sedge  ( Carex  concinnoides) 
Elk  sedge  ( Carex  geyeri) 

Ross’s  sedge  ( Carex  rossii) 

Blue  wild-rye  ( Elymus  glaucus) 

Idaho  fescue  ( Festuca  idahoensis) 
Junegrass  ( Koeleria  cristata) 

Oniongrass  ( Melica  bulbosa) 

Wheeler  bluegrass  ( Poa  nervosa) 

Western  needlegrass  ( Stipa  occidentalis) 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS 


Appendix  E 


VEGETATION  SPECIES  LIST  FOR  THE  MOYER-SALT  TIMBER  SALE  ANALYSIS  AREA 


FORBS 

Common  yarrow  (Achillaea  millifollium) 

Rose  pussytoes  [Antennaria  microphylla) 

Pussytoes  (Antennaria  racemosa) 

Arenaria  or  sandwort  [Arenaria  aculeata ) 

Arenaria  or  sandwort  [Arenaria  macrophylla) 

Heartleaf  arnica  [firnica  cordifolia) 

Mountain  arnica  [Arnica  latifolia) 

Arrowleaf  balsamroot  [Balsamorhiza  sagittata) 

Common  Indian  paintbrush  ( Castilleja  miniata) 

Prince’s  pine  ( Chimaphila  umbellata) 

Fireweed  [Epilobium  angustifolium) 

Wild  strawberry  ( Fragaria  virginiana) 

Richardson’s  geranium  ( Geranium  richardsonii) 

Sticky  geranium  ( Geranium  viscosissimum) 

Hawkweed  ( Hieracium  albiflorum) 

Hawkweed  ( Hieracium  graciie) 

Silver  lupine  ( Lupinus  argenteus) 

Mountain  sweet-root  (Ormorhiza  chilensis) 

Sickletop  lousewort  or  parrot’s  beak  [Pedicularis  racemosa) 
Cinquefoil  ( Potentilla  diversifolia) 

Side-bells  pyrola  or  wintergreen  ( Pyrola  secunda) 

Groundsel  (Senecio  streptanthifolius) 

False  Solomon’s  seal  (Smilacina  racemosa) 

Alpine  goldenrod  ( Solidago  multiradiata) 

Western  meadowrue  ( Thalictrum  occidentalis) 

Sitka  valerian  ( Valeriana  sitchensis) 

False  hellebore  [Veratrum  viride) 

Blue  violet  (Viola  adunca) 

Round-leaved  violet  ( Viola  orbiculata) 

Goosefoot  violet  ( Viola  purpurea) 


APPENDIX  F 


BIOLOGICAL  ASSESSMENT  FOR  FEDERALLY  LISTED: 

PLANT  AND  TERRESTRIAL  VERTEBRATE 

SPECIES 


FISH  SPECIES 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  FI 


BIOLOGICAL  ASSESSMENT  FOR  FEDERALLY  LISTED 
SPECIES  OF 

PLANTS  AND  TERRESTRIAL  VERTEBRATES 


Prepared  by:  C.R.  Wenger,  Forest  Wildlife  Biologist 


March  31,  1993 


BIOLOGICAL  ASSESSMENT 


for 


THE  PROPOSED 

MOYER-SALT  ENVIRONMENTAL  IMPACT  STATEMENT 


Salmon  National  Forest 
Salmon,  Idaho 


March  31,  1993 


Prepared  by: 


C.  RICHARD  WENGER 
Forest  Biologist 


I.  INTRODUCTION 


As  part  of  the  Forest  Plan  (FLRMP)  implementation  process,  the  Cobalt  Ranger  District  of  the 
Salmon  National  Forest  is  proposing  to  harvest  the  Moyer-Salt  Timber  Sale  in  the  Moyer  Creek 
and  Woodtick  Creek  drainages,  major  tributaries  of  Panther  Creek  (Figure  1-2).  This  proposed 
project  area  is  located  approximately  8.5  miles  south  of  the  old  townsite  of  Cobalt,  Idaho.  Included 
within  this  area  is  a large  portion  of  the  Taylor  Mountain  Inventoried  Roadless  Area  (No.  13902). 

The  most  prevalent  forested  habitat  types  are  Douglas-fir/pinegrass  and  Douglas-hr/Idaho  fescue 
on  the  lower  elevations  and  subalpine  fir/grouse  whortleberry  on  the  higher  elevations.  The  latter 
is  represented  by  various  serai  stands  ranging  from  pure  lodgepole  pine  to  subalpine  fir.  The 
entire  analysis  area  provides  good  to  excellent  summer  habitat  for  elk  and  mule  deer  and  the  lower 
elevations,  dominated  by  sagebrush/bunchgrass  communities  offer  good  winter  range,  especially  for 
elk.  Forested  riparian  areas  are  most  commonly  occupied  by  Engelmann  spruce/red  osier  dogwood 
and  nonforested  ones  are  in  the  willow/sedge  series. 

This  Biological  Assessment  conforms  with  the  legal  requirements  set  forth  under  Section  7 of  the 
Endangered  Species  Act  (19  U.S.C.  1536(c),  50  CFR  204.12(f)  and  402.14(c)  and  FSM  2672.42). 

II.  CONSULTATION  TO  DATE 

A Species  List  for  this  project  was  provided  by  the  US  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service  on  January  29,  1991, 
(List  #l-4-91-SP-204).  There  were  no  listed  species  on  this  list.  This  list  was  updated  via  telephone 
on  March  31,  1993,  and  the  gray  wolf  which  is  currently  classified  as  endangered  was  added. 

III.  CURRENT  MANAGEMENT  DIRECTION 

The  project  area  for  this  proposal  is  primarily  within  3A-4A  (anadromous  fish  - key  big  game  winter 
range),  3A-5B  (anadromous  fish-medium  timber  investment),  and  3A-5A  (anadromous  fish-high 
timber  investment)  management  prescription  areas  as  delineated  in  the  current  FLRMP.  Wildlife 
and  fish  management  goals  and  objectives  for  this  area  are  thus  focused  on  anadromous  fish  species 
habitat  needs  and  on  providing  wildlife  habitat  quality  and  quantity  commensurate  with  Idaho 
Department  of  Fish  and  Game  species  management  goals,  particularly  for  big  game,  while  providing 
timber  outpu  ts. 

No  specific  habitat  management  plans  or  species  management  guidelines  currently  exist  for  gray 
wolves  in  this  area.  However,  this  area  is  within  the  Central  Idaho  Wolf  Recovery  Area  as  roughly 
delineated  in  the  Northern  Rocky  Mountain  Wolf  Recovery  Plan  (USFWS  1987). 

IV.  DESCRIPTION  OF  PROJECT  PROPOSAL 

The  Forest  Service  proposes  to  harvest  timber,  construct  and  reconstruct  roads,  and  regenerate 
new  stands  of  trees  in  portions  of  the  Moyer  Creek,  Sait  Creek,  Woodtick  Creek,  and  Goodluck 
Creek  drainages,  and  Pete’s  Gulch  in  the  Cobalt  Ranger  District  of  the  Salmon  National  Forest 
(Figure  1-2,  Location  Map).  The  proposed  Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sale  (formerly  the  Moyer  Salt 
and  Salt  Creek  timber  sales)  was  originally  disclosed  in  the  Notice  of  Intent  in  the  July  6,  1990, 
Federal  Register.  The  proposed  timber  harvesting  and  road  construction  activities  would  harvest 
about  747  acres  in  a maximum  of  30  units  and  construct  about  17.8  miles  of  road.  Trees  harvested 


from  these  units  would  yield-' approximately  6.0  million  board  feet  (mmbf)  of  timber.  This  sale 
would  be  offered  in  1993.  The  timing  of  timber  harvesting  and  road  building  would  be  staggered 
between  two  subdivisions  to  provide  wildlife  displacement  opportunities. 

V.  EFFECTS  OF  PROPOSED  ACTION 

The  gray  wolf,  an  endangered  species  since  1973,  commonly  occurred  on  the  Salmon  National  Forest 
up  until  the  1940’s.  Since  that  time,  no  verified  sightings  have  been  documented  (i.e.  hair  samples, 
photographs,  or  dead  animals).  However,  observations/reports  have  been  received  from  the  Salmon 
area  since  1968.  Many  of  these  observations  are  unverified  wolf  sightings  along  the  Continental 
Divide.  Among  these  sightings  are  three  highly  probable  reports  which  were  made  near  Leadore 
about  a decade  ago.  In  1980  and  1981,  tracks  of  large  canids  were  found  in  Cruikshank  Creek  by 
a US  Forest  Service  biologist  and  both  observations  are  considered  highly  probable.  One  other 
probable  sighting  of  three  animals  was  made  in  Hawley  Creek  in  1982.  These  sightings  occurred 
approximately  75  miles  southeast  of  the  Moyer-Salt  analysis  area. 

Wolves  are  opportunistic  predators  that  prey  on  large  ungulates  as  well  as  small  to  mid-size  mam- 
mals. They  hunt  cooperatively  and  the  complex  social  interactions  of  the  wolf  pack  enable  them 
to  successfully  kill  elk,  moose  and  deer.  However,  most  of  the  sightings  made  in  the  Lemhi  valley 
are  of  single  animals  suggesting  that  these  wolves  may  be  dispersing  individuals  who  are  traveling 
through  the  area,  perhaps  searching  for  vacant  suitable  habitat  or  mates. 

Repeated  efforts  to  locate  tracks,  scats  and  howling  wolves  in  the  past  three  years  has  been  unsuc- 
cessful on  the  Salmon  National  Forest.  (See  Forest  and  District  files  of  TE&S  inventories.)  Historic 
(recent)  observations  of  these  canines  indicate  that  wolves  may  inhabit  the  Forest  periodically  but 
the  lack  of  consistent  or  verified  sightings  and  responses  to  howling  surveys  show  that  wolves  most 
likely  are  not  residents  of  this  Forest. 

Wolf  habitat  quality  is  directly  linked  to  low  human  activity  (i.e.  low  road  density  and  motorized 
travel  restrictions)  and  large  ungulate  density.  The  Moyer-Salt  area  is  easily  accessed  by  improved 
and  primitive  roads  and  motorized  travel  is  essentially  unrestricted  except  for  the  administratively 
closed  Woodtick  Road.  Although  prey  populations,  particularly  elk,  are  currently  adequate  to 
support  pack  activity  over  most  of  the  Cobalt  Ranger  District,  including  this  specific  area  which  is 
an  important  big  game  summering  area,  the  whole  area  is  so  easily  accessed  and  dissected  by  roads 
and  trails  that  successful  recolonization  of  most  of  the  District  is  doubtful.  However,  this  area  is 
considered  important  to  the  overall  recovery  goals  for  this  species. 

A.  Direct  Effects 

The  road  system  that  will  be  constructed  to  access  the  proposed  timber  harvest  units  will  be 
gated  and  administratively  closed  to  motorized  traffic.  In  addition  the  portion  of  road  through 
the  mapped  key  elk  summer  range  will  have  slash  piled  on  the  road  surface  to  effectively  prevent 
human  use  by  foot  or  horse.  Consequently,  human  access  and  presence,  after  completion  of  sale 
activities,  should  not  be  appreciably  different  (i.e.  more)  than  current  or  presale.  Therefore,  the 
only  time  when  human  presence  in  the  area  will  be  above  current  levels  is  during  the  active  portion 
of  the  sale.  Since  the  primary  cause  of  direct  wolf  mortality  is  human  encounters,  it  follows  that 
the  only  time  the  potential  for  direct  mortality  will  increase  is  during  the  active  portion  of  the 
sale.  This  increase  should  be  insignificant  because  wolves  are  not  known  to  frequent  the  allotment, 
displacement  of  primary  prey  species  (elk  and  mule  deer)  will  occur  during  sale  activities  and 


the  timber  operator  and  all  workers  will  be  made  aware  of  the  possible  presence  of  wolves,  their 
identification  and  endangered  status. 

B . Indirect  Effects 

Any  reduction  in  the  quality  of  big  game  (primary  prey)  habitat  could  indirectly  affect  wolf  use 
or  potential  use  of  an  area  by  decreasing  prey  availability.  All  proposed  action  alternatives,  with 
their  mitigation  measures  and  management  requirements,  are  compatible  with  FLRMP  wildlife 
habitat  management  direction  and  objectives  for  management  area  prescriptions  in  this  analysis 
area.  Consequently,  post-sale  elk  and  mule  deer  habitat  will  be  of  sufficient  quality  to  help  support 
target  populations  for  these  species  as  stated  in  the  current  Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game 
Five-Year  Species  Management  Plans.  Therefore  no  indirect  effects  on  wolves  or  their  habitat  are 
predicted. 

VI.  DETERMINATION 

It  is  my  determination  that  the  actions  proposed  in  the  Moyer-Salt  Timber  Sale  may  affect  but  are 
not  likely  to  adversely  affect  the  Endangered  gray  wolf,  its  habitat  or  its  recovery  potential  for  the 
following  reasons: 


1.  No  critical  habitat  has  been  identified  in  this  project  area. 

2.  Wolves  are  not  known  or  suspected  to  frequent  this  area. 

3.  Human  encounters,  the  only  potential  direct  effect  on  wolves,  will  be  mitigated 
via  informing  all  persons  involved  in  the  timber  sale  operation  of  the  possible 
presence  of  wolves  , their  identification  and  endangered  status. 

VII.  SIGNATURE 


Wildlife  Biologist 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  F2 


BIOLOGICAL  ASSESSMENT  FOR  FISHERIES 
MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 

Prepared  by:  Robert  Rose,  Fishery  Biologist,  Salmon  National  Forest 


April,  1992 

Reviewed  by:  Bruce  Smith,  Forest  Fishery  Biologist 


Approved  by:  Dan  Baird,  Branch  Chief, 
Range,  Recreation,  Watershed,  & Wildlife 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  E1S 


Appendix  F2 


Introduction 

This  Biological  Assessment  (BA)  addresses  the  potential  impacts  of  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  on 
listed  and  proposed  Threatened  and  Endangered  aquatic  vertebrate  (fish)  species.  The  Biological 
Assessment  process  is  intended  to  conduct  and  document  activities  necessary  to  ensure  proposed 
management  actions  will  not  jeopardize  the  continued  existence  or  cause  adverse  modification  of 
habitat  for: 

A.  Species  listed  or  proposed  to  be  listed  as  Endangered  (E)  or  Threatened  (T)  by  the 
USDI  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service  (USFWS). 

B.  Species  listed  or  proposed  to  be  listed  as  Endangered  (E)  or  Threatened  (T)  by  the 
USDC  National  Marine  Fisheries  Service. 

This  BA  was  prepared  by  Robert  Rose,  Fishery  Biologist,  Salmon  National  Forest,  in  accordance  with 
direction  provided  in  Section  7(c)  of  the  Endangered  Species  Act  and  in  Section  2672.42  of  the  Forest 
Sen/ice  Manual  (FSM).  The  conclusions  and  recommendations  in  the  BA  were  drawn  from  the 
following  data  sources:  documentation  of  sightings  and  suitable  habitat  during  a site-specific  T&E 
field  survey  within  the  analysis  area  of  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale;  a literature  review;  and,  contact 
with  professionals  knowledgeable  of  species’  habitat  requirements.  Findings  and  conclusions  were 
reviewed  by  Bruce  Smith,  Forest  Fishery  Biologist,  and  Dan  Baird,  Branch  Chief;  Range,  Recreation, 
Watershed  and  Wildlife  Branch. 

Proposed  Action 

As  part  of  the  Forest  Plan  implementation  process,  the  Cobalt  Ranger  District  of  the  Salmon  National 
Forest  is  proposing  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  within  the  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area  (No. 
13-902)  (See  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  EIS,  Figure  1).  Under  the  proposed  action  and  its  alternatives, 
the  Forest  Service  proposes  to  construct  between  15.7  and  17.8  miles  of  road,  and  harvest  between 
3.75  and  6.90  mmbf  of  timber  on  440  to  847  acres  within  the  upper  Woodtick  Creek  watershed  and 
the  upper  Salt  and  ’Perm'  Creek  drainages  of  the  Moyer  Creek  watershed.  These  proposed  actions 
are  designed  to  help  achieve  the  silvicultural  goals  and  objectives  of  the  1 988  Salmon  National  Forest 
Land  and  Resource  Management  Plan  (Forest  Plan)  (USDA  Forest  Service,  1988)  to  help  satisfy  the 
short-term  demand  for  timber  while  providing  for  community  stability  and  maintenance  of  a continu- 
ous supply  of  timber  for  the  future. 

Threatened  and  Endangered  Species 

The  National  Marine  Fisheries  Sen/ice  (NMFS)  has  recently  listed  the  Snake  River  Basin  sockeye 
(Oncorhynchus  nerka)  as  an  ’Endangered*  species  (Federal  Register,  November  20,  1991),  and  the 
Snake  River  Basin  spring/summer  Chinook  (Oncorhynchus  tshawytscha)  as  a Threatened’  species 
(Federal  Register,  April  22,  1992)  under  provisions  of  the  Federal  Endangered  Species  Act  of  1973. 

In  accordance  with  Section  7(c)  of  the  Endangered  Species  Act,  the  National  Marine  Fisheries  Service 
(NMFS)  was  notified  of  the  proposed  action  (Telephone  conference  of  Oct  8,  1991  and  letter  of  April 
6,  1992  to  Karen  Holtz,  National  Marine  Fisheries  Service)  and  asked  to  provide  the  Forest  with  a 
determination  of  the  presence  or  absence  of  proposed  Threatened  and/or  Endangered  anadromous 
fish  species  within  a designated  project  analysis  area  encompassing  the  Moyer  and  Woodtick  Creek 
drainages.  At  this  time,  the  National  Marine  Fisheries  Service  has  not  identified  critical  recovery 
habitat  for  either  Snake  River  sockeye  or  Snake  River  spring/summer  Chinook  salmon.  This  Biological 
Assessment,  therefore,  was  prepared  based  upon  Chinook  salmon  habitat  suitablity  information 


Moyer  Saft  Timber  Sale  Final  E1S 


Appendix  F2 


supplied  by  the  Northwest  Power  Planning  Council  (NPPC),  Salmon  National  Forest  fisheries  file 
information,  and  general  documentation  of  historic  Chinook  salmon  utilization  of  spawning  and 
rearing  habitats  within  the  Panther  Creek  drainage. 

While  the  Panther  Creek  drainage  system  was  historically  a major  producer  of  spring  Chinook  salmon 
and  summer  steelhead  (Reiser,  1986),  utilization  of  its  mainstem  and  tributary  waters  by  these  fish 
began  a decline  in  the  1 940s,  and  has  been  largely  precluded  since  the  1 960s  by  chemical  pollution 
of  mid  and  lower  mainstem  Panther  Creek  migration  corridors  attributable  to  operations  of  the 
Blackbird  Mine  (Reiser,  1986;  Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game,  1965).  Despite  these  mainstem 
water  quality  problems,  however,  Panther  Creek  and  its  historically  utilized  tributaries,  including 
Moyer  Creek,  continue  to  be  regarded  as  potentially  viable  producers  of  spring/summer  Chinook 
salmon  (Northwest  Power  Planning  Council,  1988).  The  Salmon  National  Forest  Land  and  Resource 
Management  Plan  (FLRMP)  calls  for  continued  management  directed  toward  these  anadromous 
stocks  in  anticipation  of  correction  of  mine  drainage  problems  and  recovery  of  mainstem  water  quality 
(USDA  Forest  Service,  1988).  Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game  management  prescriptions  for  the 
two  streams  calls  for  a preservation  management  strategy  for  anadromous  fish  stocks,  which  main- 
tains a harvest  closure  and  may  supplement  natural  recruitment  with  possible  stockings  of  fry  or 
fingerlings  (Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game,  1991).  The  Northwest  Power  Planning  Council 
Salmon  River  Sub-Basin  Plan  also  includes  a recovery  program  for  the  Panther  Creek  drainage 
(Northwest  Power  Planning  Council,  1990). 

Sockeye  Salmon  utilize  the  waters  of  the  mainstem  Salmon  River  as  a migration  corridor  to  traditional 
spawning  areas  within  the  Sawtooth  National  Recreation  Area,  but  are  not  known  to  spawn  in  streams 
or  lakes  of  the  Salmon  National  Forest  (Simpson  and  Wallace,  1982). 


Occupied  and  Unoccupied  Critical  or  Proposed  Critical  Habitat 

The  National  Marine  Fisheries  Service  has  not,  at  this  time,  designated  any  critical  or  proposed  critical 
habitat  for  recovery  of  Chinook  salmon.  Salmon  National  Forest  management  direction  for  Panther 
Creek  and  its  major  tributaries,  however,  reflects  recognition  of  the  importance  of  the  drainage  as  a 
major  potential  producer  of  both  Chinook  salmon  and  steelhead,  as  evidenced  by  its  inclusion  within 
the  3A-5A,'  3A-5B,  and  3A-5C  management  areas  (USDA  Forest  Service,  1988).  Moyer  Creek  has 
been  identified  as  the  single  most  important  historic  Chinook  salmon  spawning  tributary  of  the 
Panther  Creek  drainage  system  (Reiser,  1986).  Northwest  Power  Planning  Council  presence/ 
absence  files  for  the  Panther  Creek  sub-basin  indicate  a potential  production  of  36,730  Chinook 
salmon  smolts  annually  within  the  Moyer  Creek  drainage  (Northwest  Power  Planning  Council,  1 988). 
The  NPPC  files  do  not  indictate  any  potential  for  Chinook  salmon  production  within  the  Woodtick 
Creek  drainage,  although  the  habitat  capability  for  potential  production  of  steelhead  is  acknowl- 
edged. Field  review  of  the  Woodtick  Creek  by  Forest  fisheries  personnel  indicates  that  the  NPPC 
assessment  of  the  stream  reflects  the  steeper  stream  gradient,  as  well  as  the  questionable  access 
by  Chinook  salmon  under  summer  flow  conditions.  A minor  amount  of  th 

Potential  Effects  on  Species  or  Habitat 

Potential  effects  of  timber  harvest  activities  on  fisheries  resources  are  primarily  related  to  impacts  on 
stream  substrates,  fish  migration  opportunities,  riparian  area  integrity,  and  streamflow  magnitude  and 
timing.  Forest  transportation  systems  which  are  poorly  designed  or  lacking  in  effective  mitigation 
measures  can  have  significant  effects  on  fish  and  their  habitats  as  a result  of  direct  deposition  of 
sediment  into  stream  channels  (Yee  and  Roelofs,  1980).  Incremental  sediment  contribution  per  unit 
area  as  a result  of  poor  road  design  can  potentially  exceed  that  from  all  other  land  management 
activities,  including  log  skidding  and  yarding  (Yee  and  Roelofs,  1980).  Excess  sediment  production 
can  adversely  affect  fish  habitat  by  reducing  substrate  permeability  (Wicket,  1958;  Mcneil  and  Ahnell, 
1964),  impeding  or  preventing  fry  emergence  (Koski,  1966;  Bjornn,  1969),  and  reducing  rearing  and 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  F2 


overwintering  habitat  (Phillips,  1970).  Increased  sedimentation  of  stream  substrates  are  also  associ- 
ated with  decreased  diversity  of  cover  for  bottom  fauna  (Sprules,  1947;  Kimble  and  Wesche,  1975). 
Massive  increases  in  sediment  production  may  exceed  the  stream’s  ability  to  transport  the  load  that 
has  been  introduced  (Leopold,  1964). 

Improperly  designed  road  culverts  associated  with  stream  crossings  have  the  potential  to  create 
barriers  to  fish  migration,  usually  because  of  excessive  outfall  heights  or  water  velocities,  insufficient 
water  depths,  lack  of  resting  pools,  or  combinations  of  these  factors  (Evans  and  Johnson,  1 974;  Yee 
and  Roelofs,  1980). 

Riparian  vegetation  serves  an  important  role  in  stabilizing  banks,  providing  summer  stream  shading 
and  winter  thermal  cover,  contributing  organic  matter  and  terrestrial  insects  to  the  stream,  and 
serving  as  a buffer  against  sediment  transport  into  stream  channels  (Meehan  et  al,  1 977;  Yee  and 
Roelofs,  1 980).  Improper  timber  harvest  techniques  which  result  in  the  removal  of  riparian  vegetation 
or  streamside  shade  trees  have  the  potential  to  increase  summer  water  temperatures,  decrease 
winter  water  temperatures,  and  adversely  affect  egg  incubation  (Greene,  1950;  Chapman,  1962). 
Removal  of  overhanging  vegetative  cover  can  result  in  increased  predation  and  reduction  of  pre- 
ferred juvenile  salmonid  microhabitats  (Chapman,  1966;  Allen,  1969),  and  accelerated  formation  of 
anchor  ice  (Bruce  Smith,  personal  communication). 

Timber  harvest  encompassing  more  than  15  to  20  percent  of  a drainage’s  total  basin  area  has  been 
shown  to  be  capable  of  producing  modifications  to  peak  runoff  flow  timing  and  magnitude  (Troendle 
and  Leaf,  1982,  as  cited  by  Troendle,  1985).  Extensive  timber  harvest  activity  within  a drainage  has 
the  potential  to  increase  water  yields  and  peak  flows  to  a point  that  channel  erosion  occurs  (Rosgen, 
1978). 

Cumulative  Effects 

Previous  timber  management  activities  within  the  Moyer-Salt  Timber  Sale  analysis  area  include  the 
1988  Tick  Creek  Timber  Sale,  which  harvested  23.0  percent  of  the  Little  Woodtick  Creek  drainage. 
This  level  of  of  harvest  has  been  shown  to  produce  significant  increases  in  water  yield  within  a 
drainage  (Troendle  and  Leaf,  1982,  as  cited  by  Troendle,  1985),  and  was  believed  to  be  the  factor 
responsible  for  an  apparent  increase  in  peak  runoff  flow  within  the  Little  Woodtick  Creek  drainage 
during  the  1991  water  year  (Elizabeth  Rieffenberger,  personal  communication).  Within  the  larger 
Woodtick  Creek  drainage,  the  Tick  Creek  Sale  corresponded  to  a 5.2  percent  harvest  of  the  total 
drainage  basin.  The  increased  magnitude  of  peak  flow  observed  within  the  Little  Woodtick  Creek 
drainage  was  not  believed  to  have  produced  any  deleterious  impacts  to  mainstem  Woodtick  Creek 
(Elizabeth  Rieffenberger,  personal  communication)  due  to  variation  in  the  timing  of  peak  runoff 
between  the  two  streams.  Additional  harvest  operations  within  the  Woodtick  Creek  drainage,  if 
conducted  at  an  intensity  comparable  to  that  of  the  Tick  Creek  Timber  Sale,  however,  would  have 
the  potential  to  adveresly  affect  the  magnitude  and  timing  of  runoff  flows  in  mainstem  Woodtick  Creek. 

Determination 

Contingent  upon  implementation  of  Salmon  National  Forest  soil  and  water  Best  Management  Prac- 
tices (BMPs)  (Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  EIS,  Appendix  A)  and  proposed  site-specific  soil,  water  and 
fisheries  mitigation  measures  (Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS,  Chapter  II,  Mitigation  Measures, 
Chapter  2),  implementation  of  the  proposed  road  construction  and  timber  harvest  activities  is  not 
likely  to  adversely  affect  identified  T&E  fish  species  within  the  Moyer  Creek  or  Woodtick  Creek 
drainages.  Rationale  for  this  determination  follows. 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  E1S 


Appendix  F2 


Rationale  for  Determination 

Direct  and  Indirect  Effects 


In  making  a determination  of  the  potential  effects  of  road  construction  and  timber  harvest  on  TES  fish 
species,  primary  considerations  are  sedimentation  of  stream  substrates,  degradation  of  riparian  area 
integrity,  impairment  of  migration  opportunities,  and  modification  of  annual  streamflow  patterns. 
Salmon  National  Forest  soil  and  water  Best  Management  Practices  (BMPs)  and  site-specific  soil, 
water,  and  fisheries  mitigation  measures  identified  in  Chapter  II  of  the  Moyer-Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft 
E1S  are  designed  to  address  and  minimize  potential  sediment,  migration,  and  riparian  impacts  to 
fisheries  resources  associated  with  road  construction  and  timber  harvest  activities.  Implementation 
of  these  measures  will  ensure  that  1)  sediment  generated  as  a result  of  road  construction  or  timber 
harvest  is  both  minimized  and  intercepted  before  entering  stream  channels,  2)  riparian  integrity  is 
maintained  to  ensure  adequate  shading  of  stream  channels  and  retention  of  protective  overhead 
cover  from  predators,  3)  transportation  route  crossings  of  streams  containing  fisheries  resources  are 
designed  to  accommodate  species-specific  migration  needs,  and  4)  basin  harvest  intensity  is  con- 
strained to  levels  which  do  not  produce  significant  modification  of  peak  streamflow  intensities  and/or 
timing. 

Road  construction  and  timber  harvest  activities  proposed  for  this  timber  sale  will  be  concentrated  to 
a large  extent  on  mid  or  upper  slopes  of  the  Woodtick,  Sait  and  ■Perm*  Creek  drainages.  Only  six  of 
32  proposed  cutting  units  will  be  located  at  distances  within  200  feet  of  active  stream  channels.  At 
these  sites,  filter  strip  widths  consistent  with  Forest  Plan  direction  will  be  employed  to  intercept 
sediment  before  reaching  stream  channels.  Additionally,  these  buffers  will  be  maintained  in  an  uncut 
status  to  retain  existing  ground  cover  within  riparian  areas,  ensure  adequate  shading  of  active  stream 
channels,  maintain  streambank  stability,  and  provide  for  future  recruitment  of  large  organic  debris. 

Under  the  various  proposed  alternatives,  stream  crossings  will  be  required  on  Woodtick,  Goodluck, 
Perm,  and  Salt  Creek.  At  all  stream  crossings  where  fish  are  known  or  suspected  to  occur,  design 
criteria  will  ensure  yearround  fish  passage  opportunities.  Installation  activities  will  be  timed  to  precede 
the  bull  trout  spawning  period,  and  will  be  consistent  with  Forest  guidelines  (see  “Performance 
Criteria  to  be  Observed  to  Protect  Stream  Channels’,  Appendix  C)  to  ensure  minimal  water  quality 
and  stream  substrate  impacts  below  construction  sites.  Additionally,  an  existing  60  inch  culvert  on 
Woodtick  Creek  (Section  32  of  Township  20  N,  Range  19  E)  which  currently  presents  a barrier  to 
migration  of  both  resident  and  anadromous  fish  is  to  be  repaired  or  replaced  under  a variety  of 
funding  mechanisms  dependent  upon  the  selected  action  alternative.  Correction  of  this  barrier  will 
reopen  access  to  previously  unreachable  steelhead  spawning  habitat  within  the  upper  reaches  of 
Woodtick  Creek.  Localized  construction-related  impacts  to  stream  substrates  at  this  site  are  expected 
to  be  ameliorated  within  the  time  frame  of  natural  or  enhanced  recovery  of  mainstem  Panther  Creek 
water  quality. 

Under  the  most  timber-intensive  proposed  harvest  alternative,  total  basin  harvest  would  be  limited 
to  3.0  percent  of  the  Woodtick  Creek  drainage,  14.3  percent  of  the  Salt  Creek  drainage,  and  14.2 
percent  of  the  “Perm'  Creek  drainage.  This  level  of  basin  disturbance  would  be  substantially  below 
the  15  to  20  percent  regarded  as  capable  of  producing  significantly  increased  water  yield  (Troendle 
and  Leaf,  1980,  as  cited  by  Troendle,  1982)  in  the  Woodtick  Creek  drainage,  and  would  approach 
but  not  reach  these  levels  in  the  previously  undisturbed  Salt  and  “Perm*  Creek  drainages  of  the  Moyer 
Creek  system.  Proposed  harvest  prescriptions  under  other  alternatives  identified  within  the  Moyer- 
Salt  Draft  EIS  would  impact  substantially  less  of  the  Salt  and  “Perm*  Creek  drainage  basins. 

Cumulative  Effects 

Foreseeable  nearterm  activities  within  the  analysis  area  are  limited  to  timber  stand  improvement 
operations  within  shelterwood  cutting  units,  post  and  pole  sales,  and  public  firewood  salvage.  No 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EiS 


Appendix  F2 


Troendle,  C.  A.  1982. 

The  Effects  of  Small  Clearcuts  on  Water  Yield  from  the  Deadhorse  Watershed; 
Fraser,  Colorado,  p 75-83.  In:  Proceedings  of  the  50th  Annual  Meeting  of 
the  Western  Snow  Conference  (Reno,  Nev.,  April  19-23,  1982)  225  p. 
Colorado  State  University,  Fort  Collins,  Colo. 

USDA  Forest  Service.  1988. 

Forest  Land  and  Resource  Management  Plan  for  the  Salmon  National  Forest, 
and  EIS. 


APPENDIX  G 

BIOLOGICAL  EVALUATION  FOR  SENSITIVE  SPECIES: 

PLANTS  AND  TERRESTRIAL  VERTEBRATES 


FISH  SPECIES 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  G1 


APPENDIX  G1 

BIOLOGICAL  EVALUATION  FOR  SENSITIVE  SPECIES  OF 
PLANTS  AND  TERRESTRIAL  VERTEBRATES 


Prepared  for  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale 
Cobalt  Ranger  District 
Salmon  National  Forest 


Prepared  by  : C.R.  Wenger,  Forest  Wildlife  Biologist 


March  9,  1992 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  G1 


I.  INTRODUCTION 


As  part  of  the  Forest  Plan  implementation  process,  the  Cobalt  Ranger  District  of  the  Salmon  National 
Forest  is  proposing  to  harvest  the  Moyer  Salt  and  Salt  Creek  timber  sale  in  the  Taylor  Mountain 
Inventoried  Roadless  Area  No.  13902.  The  analysis  area  for  this  sale  includes  portions  of  the  Moyer 
Creek  and  Woodtick  Creek  drainages,  both  of  which  are  tributaries  to  Panther  Creek. 

In  accordance  with  Section  7(c)  of  the  Endangered  Species  Act  of  1973,  as  amended,  the  US  Fish 
and  Wildlife  Service  (FWS)  was  notified  of  this  proposed  action  and  determined  that  no  listed  or 
proposed  threatened  or  endangered  species  are  known  present  in  the  Moyer  Salt  analysis  area. 
Consequently,  these  species  will  not  be  addressed  further. 

Region  4,  the  Intermountain  Region  of  the  USDA  Forest  Service,  has  compiled  a list  of  30  vertebrate 
"sensitive"  species.  This  list  contains  only  species  for  which  population  viability  is  a concern,  as 
evidenced  by  significant  current  or  predicted  downward  trends  in  population  or  habitat  capability.  Of 
these  species,  only  one,  the  Northern  goshawk  (Acc/p/fer  gentilis)  has  been  observed  and  thus  is 
known  to  occur  in  this  analysis  area.  However,  based  upon  habitat  preferences,  the  following  species 
may  also  occur:  North  American  lynx  (Felis  lynx  canadensis),  wolverine  ( Gulo  gulo),  Western  big- 
eared  bat  ( Plecotus  townsendii),  boreal  owl  (flegolius  funereus),  Northern  three-toed  woodpecker 
( Picoides  tridactylus),  great  gray  owl  (Strix  nebulosa),  and  spotted  frog  (Rana  pretiosa).  In  addition, 
this  region  has  also  compiled  a Sensitive  Plant  Species  List  for  each  Forest.  Of  the  12  species 
currently  on  the  Salmon  National  Forest’s  list,  only  Penstemon  lemhiensis  may  possibly  occur  on  this 
analysis  area. 

The  Conservation  Data  Center,  a branch  of  the  Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game,  has  also 
prepared  a list  of  vertebrate  "Species  of  Special  Concern."  Examination  of  this  list  did  not  reveal  any 
additional  species  that  may  occur  in  this  analysis  area. 

Because  there  are  no  federally  listed  terrestrial  vertebrate  threatened  or  endangered  species  in  the 
Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  analysis  area,  the  objective  of  this  Biological  Evaluation  is  to  predict  the 
probable  effects,  positive,  negative  or  neutral,  of  the  Moyer  Salt  and  Salt  Creek  Timber  Sale  proposal 
on  the  previously  listed  sensitive  species  that  may  occur  here.  Detailed  descriptions  of  the  proposed 
action  and  the  alternatives  are  contained  in  the  body  of  this  Environmental  Impact  Statement  (EIS) 
and  will  not  be  repeated  here. 


IS.  VERTEBRATE  SENSITIVE  SPECIES 
A.  North  American  Lynx 

The  lynx,  a close  relative  of  the  bobcat,  is  a common  wild  felid  in  the  boreal  forests  of  Canada,  Alaska 
and  the  northern  Rocky  Mountains  as  far  south  as  southern  Colorado  and  northern  New  Mexico 
(Quinn  and  Parker,  1 987).  Lynx  are  extremely  well  adapted  to  travel  in  deep  snow  (Koehler  and  Brittell, 
1 990).  This  is  vital  to  the  pursuit  of  snowshoe  hare,  their  primary  prey  species.  Lynx  predation  on  large 
mammals  is  very  uncommon.  Mean  snow  accumulation  on  winter  ranges  is  apparently  the  most 
important  factor  that  creates  niche  separation  between  lynx  and  bobcats. 

Because  lynx  depend  very  heavily  upon  snowshoe  hare  as  their  principal  food  source,  good  hare 
habitat  is  also  considered  good  lynx  habitat.  In  the  analysis  area,  snowshoe  hare  and  thus  lynx  are 
most  commonly  found  in  the  spruce/subalpine  fir  forests  where  shrubby  riparian  zones  and/or 
openings  occur.  These  areas  provide  both  good  conifer  cover  and  browse  for  hares.  Consequently, 


G1  -2 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  G1 


any  irregular  pattern  of  logging  and/or  fire  in  high  elevation  forests  usually  provide  prime  hare  and 
lynx  habitat.  Therefore  timber  harvest  activity  as  proposed  in  any  of  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  action 
alternatives  spelld  actually  have  a positive  effect  on  lynx  (and  snowshoe  hare)  populations. 

B.  Wolverine 

The  wolverine  is  the  largest  terrestrial  member  of  the  mustelid  family.  Worldwide,  this  species  has  a 
vast  circumboreal  distribution.  In  North  America  wolverines  commonly  occur  throughout  Alaska  and 
northwest  Canada.  Occupied  range  along  the  Rocky  Mountains  south  into  the  counterminous  U.S. 
is  currently  uncertain  but  is  known  to  include  Montana,  Idaho  and  the  northwest  corner  of  Wyoming. 
They  are  confined  to  montane  boreal  regions  where  their  large  feet  serve  well  for  travel  over  deep 
snow,  digging  for  prey  and  climbing  (Hash  1987).  Wolverines  usually  occupy  backcountry  or  wilder- 
ness areas  with  little  or  no  human  habitation.  Densities  are  low  in  good  habitat  and  are  extremely  low 
(i.e.  one  wolverine  in  50  to  75  square  miles)  in  the  less  suitable  habitats  such  as  the  southern  limits 
of  their  range. 

Wolverines  are  best  described  as  scavenging  predators.  However,  they  are  entirely  opportunistic 
feeders  that  utilize  prey  species  such  as  rodents  and  marmots  in  addition  to  carrion  and  various  fruits, 
etc.,  as  available.  The  large  home  range  size,  low  population  density  and  nonselective  feeding  nature 
of  this  species  makes  it  fairly  unsusceptible  to  site  specific  disturbances  such  as  timber  harvest 
activities.  This  is  especially  true  since  primary  wolverine  habitat  occurs  at  elevations  above  most 
commercial  forest  sites  on  this  Forest  and  in  this  analysis  area.  Also,  since  new  roads  will  be  closed 
after  the  proposed  sales,  human  presence  should  not  be  significantly  different  from  the  current 
situation.  For  these  reason,  this  proposed  action  is  not  expected  to  affect  possible  wolverine  pres- 
ence and/or  habitat. 

C.  Northern  Three-toed  Woodpecker 

The  northern  three-toed  woodpecker  is  relatively  common  throughout  the  montane,  boreal  conifer- 
ous forest,  particularly  in  the  spruce-fir  and  limber  pine-whitebark  pine  zones  (Larrison,  1981). 
Alternatives  under  this  proposal  are  primarily  confined  to  elevations  below  the  preferred  habitats  of 
this  species.  Consequently,  no  significant  impacts  upon  this  species  would  be  predicted. 

D.  Great  Gray  Owl 

Great  gray  owls,  like  boreal  owls,  are  found  in  the  spruce-fir  life  zones  of  the  boreal  montane 
coniferous  forests.  However,  this  species  utilizes  lodgepole  pine  habitat  types  as  well  as  subalpine 
fir  types.  In  addition,  two  major  differences  include  the  use  of  open  forests  and  openings  for  preferred 
feeding  sites  and  a preference  for  platform  instead  of  cavity  nest  sites  (De  Graff  et  al  1991).  These 
factors  make  this  species  not  susceptible  to  a proposal  such  as  this;  and,  in  fact,  the  harvest  openings 
will  contribute  to  the  preferred  feeding  sites  until  obscured  by  regeneration. 

E.  Western  Big-eared  Bat 

The  entire  Salmon  National  Forest  and  most  of  the  western  United  States  is  within  the  range  of  the 
western  or  Townsend’s  big-eared  bat.  However,  very  little  is  known  about  the  suitability  of  or  selection 
for  forested  habitats.  Caves,  abandoned  mine  tunnels  and  deserted  buildings  are  known  to  be  used 
by  nursery  colonies  and  for  hibernaculum  sites  (Larrison  and  Johnson,  1981).  None  of  these  factors 
are  known  to  exist  within  this  analysis  area.  Therefore  none  of  the  proposed  action  alternatives  are 
expected  to  have  any  direct  or  indirect  effects  on  this  species. 


G1  -3 


Moyer  SaK  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  G1 


F.  Boreal  Owl 

Hayward  (1 989)  reported  that  all  forested  sites  within  the  spruce-fir  life  zone  are  potential  boreal  owl 
habitat.  He  found  owls  nesting  most  frequently  in  mature  or  older  stands  located  within  subalpine  fir 
habitat  types  but  did  not  find  lodgepole  pine  cover  types  used  for  nesting  in  Idaho.  Nesting  and 
calling  sites  were  never  located  in  dense  even-age  or  young  forest  stands  but  were  closely  correlated 
with  relatively  high  densities  of  trees  greater  than  15  inches  dbh,  open  understories  and  multi-layered 
canopies.  Boreal  owls  are  secondary  cavity  nesters  and  most  commonly  utilize  cavities  that  were 
created  by  pileated  woodpeckers  and  flickers. 

In  this  analysis  area,  none  of  Area  I (i.e.  the  lower  elevation  portion)  would  constitute  boreal  owl 
habitat.  The  remaining  1 1 ,000  acres  in  Area  II  would  only  include  454  acres  of  harvest  units.  Of  this 
454  acres,  or  4 percent  of  the  area  that  would  be  harvested,  less  than  1 50  acres  or  1 .4  percent  would 
be  within  cover  types  that  may  provide  suitable  nesting  habitat  for  boreal  owls.  Since  boreal  owls 
actually  utilize  edges  for  feeding  and  since  this  proposal  only  affects  a small  percentage  of  the  total 
area,  any  effects  precipitated  by  an  action  alternative  would  have  an  insignificant  impact  upon  boreal 
owl  habitat  suitability. 

G.  Northern  Goshawk 

The  Northern  goshawk  breeds  from  western  and  central  Alaska  and  northern  Yukon  to  Labrador  and 
Newfoundland,  south  to  central  California,  southern  New  Mexico,  western  South  Dakota,  northern 
Minnesota  and  Connecticut  and  in  the  northern  Appalachian  Mountains  (De  Graaf  et  al.  1991). 

Northern  goshawks  require  dense  mature  to  old  growth  conifer,  mixed  conifer/aspen  or  aspen  stands 
for  nesting  in  the  Rocky  Mountain  region  (Shuster  1 980).  Nests  are  commonly  located  at  least  30  feet 
above  the  ground  in  forested  areas  with  a closed  canopy  and  little  or  no  understory,  and  are  often 
adjacent  to  open  water.  Nests  are  often  used  for  several  seasons  (Call,  1978). 

Goshawks  are  very  efficient  predators  and  take  a wide  variety  of  small  mammal  and  bird  prey  species 
from  the  air,  vegetation  and/or  ground.  They  hunt  in  dense  forested  areas,  semi-forested  areas, 
natural  openings  and  over  water,  and  utilize  prey  ranging  from  ducks  to  showshoe  hares.  Conse- 
quently, available  prey  base  is  seldom  a limiting  factor  in  Northern  goshawk  distribution  and  abun- 
dance. 

Suitable  nesting  habitat  in  the  form  of  mature  to  overmature  conifer  or  mixed  conifer/aspen  stands, 
on  the  other  hand,  are  apparently  the  most  common  limiting  factor  on  this  species.  Any  removal  of 
mature  conifer  stands,  particularly  Douglas-fir,  with  an  average  dbh  of  8 inches  or  greater,  canopy 
closure  of  40  percent  or  greater  and  at  least  25  acres  in  size  erodes  the  available  nesting  habitat  for 
Northern  goshawks. 

For  Analysis  Area  I,  approximately  1,750  acres  of  this  preferred  habitat  is  currently  present.  The 
various  action  alternatives  in  this  proposal  would  remove  from  1 3 to  1 8 percent  of  this  habitat.  This 
could  possibly  affect  one  or  more  stands  used  as  nest  sites.  However,  preferred  habitat  would  still 
be  available  throughout  the  area  and  actual  abundance  and/or  distribution  should  not  be  affected. 

Analysis  Area  II  contains  approximately  3,550  acres  of  old  growth  conifer  habitat.  However,  this  area 
is  primarily  covered  by  lodgepole  pine  and  subalpine  fir,  and  thus  is  much  less  preferred  goshawk 
nesting  habitat.  From  8 to  15  percent  of  this  habitat  would  be  removed  by  the  various  action 
alternatives  in  this  area.  These  alternatives  should  therefore  not  adversely  affect  goshawk  distribution 
or  abundance.  Openings  created  in  this  densely  forested  area  should  increase  diversity  and  abun- 
dance of  prey  species. 


G1  -4 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  G1 


These  two  areas  have  not  sustained  previous  timber  harvest  activities.  Consequently,  goshawk 
nesting  habitat  is  currently  available  in  pristine  or  natural  quantity.  The  one  nest  site  known  to  be 
present,  in  Analysis  Area  I,  will  not  be  disturbed  by  any  of  the  currently  proposed  action  alternatives. 
If  other  nest  sites  are  located  before  or  during  the  proposed  sale  activities  appropriate  mitigation 
measures  will  be  implemented  as  per  Forest  Plan  direction. 

H.  Spotted  Frog 

The  spotted  frog  is  a highly  aquatic  species  found  in  the  vicinity  of  cold  permanent  water,  especially 
streams  and  springs  (Stebbins,  1966).  This  species  frequents  both  woods  and  meadows  but  does 
not  seem  to  occur  in  warm  or  stagnant  water.  Spotted  frogs  migrate  to  upland  areas  in  May  and  return 
to  permanent  water  in  July.  Not  much  is  known  about  terrestrial  habitat  needs  of  this  species. 

This  proposal  is  not  expected  to  have  any  effect  upon  spotted  frogs  because  the  only  crossing  on 
the  only  stream  that  may  harbor  them  (Woodtick  Creek)  will  be  bottomless.  In  addition,  there  are  no 
proposed  harvest  units  closer  than  approximately  0.3  mile  to  this  stream  and  most  are  further  than 
0.5  mile  from  it. 


II.  SENSITIVE  PLANTS 

The  current  Forest  Service  Region  4 Sensitive  Plant  Species  list  for  the  Salmon  National  Forest 
contains  1 2 species.  Of  these  1 2 species,  only  Lemhi  beardtongue  (Penstemon  lemhiensis)  may 
occur  within  the  analysis  area.  This  species  is  currently  a Category  2 Candidate  Species  for  Federal 
listing  and  is  listed  as  an  Idaho  Threatened  Species  by  the  Conservation  Center.  This  plant  occurs 
in  open  sagebrush  grasslands  and  open  ponderosa  pine  forests  in  gravelly,  rocky  soils  up  to 
approximately  8,000  ft  in  elevation. 

Recent  field  surveys  indicate  that  this  species  is  quite  abundant  on  specific  sites  in  this  Forest  and 
it  has  been  located  on  all  four  Ranger  Districts.  To  date,  it  has  been  located  in  the  Panther  Creek 
drainage  but  not  within  this  analysis  area.  However,  based  upon  other  sites,  it  very  likely  occurs  on 
the  lower  elevations  (Area  1 , as  defined  in  CHapter  3 of  this  document)  of  this  analysis  area,  below 
most  of  the  proposed  harvest  activities. 

This  species  is  an  early  successional  species  that  readily  colonizes  disturbed  sites  such  as  burned 
areas  and  road  cut  and  fill  slopes.  For  this  reason,  this  proposed  action  is  not  expected  to  adversely 
affect  this  species  and,  if  it  is  present  but  not  detected,  it  would  likely  benefit  from  the  proposed 
activities. 


G1  - 5 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sai©  Final  ESS 


Appendix  G1 


Bibliography 


Cal!,  M.W.,  1978,  Nesting  habitats  and  surveying  techniques  for  common  western  raptors.  U.S. 
Department  of  Interior  Bureau  of  Land  Management  Technical  Note  TN-316. 

DeGraaf,  R.  M.,  V.  E.  Scott,  R.  H.  Hamre,  L.  Ernst  and  S.  H.  Anderson.  1991.  Forestand  Rangeland 
Birds  of  the  United  States:  Natural  History  and  Habitat  Use.  USDA  Forest  Service.  Ag.  Handbook  688. 

Hash,  H.  S.  1987.  "Wolverine."  In  Wild  Furbearer  Management  and  Conservation  in  North  America. 
eds.,  M.  Novak,  J.A.  Baker,  M.E.  Qbbard  and  B.  Malloch,  pp.  574-585.  Ashton-Potter  Limited:  Con- 
cord, Ontario.  1 1 50  pp. 

Hayward,  G.  D.  1 989.  Habitat  Use  and  Population  Biology  of  Boreal  Owls  in  the  Northern  Rocky 
Mountains,  USA.  University  of  Idaho:  Moscow.  (Ph.D.  dissertation.) 

Koehler,  G.  M.  and  J.  D.  Brittell.  1990.  “Managing  Spruce-Fir  Habitat  for  Lynx  and  Snowshoe  Hares." 
J.  of  Forestry.  88:  10-14. 

Larrison,  E.  J.  and  D.  R.  Johnson.  1981.  Mammals  of  Idaho.  University  Press  of  Idaho.  166  pp. 

Larrison,  E.  J.  1981.  Birds  of  the  Pacific  Northwest.  University  Press  of  Idaho.  337  pp. 

Quinn,  N.  W.  S.,  and  G.  Parker.  1 987.  "Lynx."  In  Wild  Furbearer  Management  and  Conservation  in  North 
America,  eds.,  M.  Novak,  et.  al.,  pp.  683-694.  Ashton-Potter  Limited:  Concord,  Ontario.  1150  pp. 

Shuster,  W.C.  1 983.  Northern  goshawk  nest  site  requirements  in  the  Colorado  Rockies.  Western  Birds 
11:89-96. 

Stebbins,  R.  C.  1966.  A Field  Guide  to  Western  Amphibians  and  Reptiles.  Houghton  Mifflin  Co.: 

Boston. 


G1  -6 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  G2 


APPENDIX  G2 

BIOLOGICAL  EVALUATION  FOR  SENSITIVE  FISH  SPECIES 


Prepared  for  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sal® 
Cobalt  Ranger  District 
Salmon  National  Forest 


Prepared  by:  Robert  W.  Rose,  Fisheries  Biologist 
February  12,  1993 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  G2 


introduction 

This  Biological  Evaluation  (BE)  addresses  the  potential  impacts  of  the  proposed  Moyer  Salt  Timber 
Sale,  located  within  the  Cobalt  Ranger  District  of  the  Salmon  National  Forest,  on  Sensitive  fish 
species.  The  Biological  Evaluation  process  is  intended  to  conduct  and  document  activities  necessary 
to  ensure  proposed  management  actions  will  not  jeopardize  the  continued  existence  or  cause 
adverse  modification  of  habitat  for  species  listed  as  Sensitive  by  the  USDA  Forest  Service  Intermoun- 
tain Region  (R4  USFS).  Sensitive  fish  species  occurring  within  the  administrative  boundaries  of  the 
Salmon  National  Forest  include  steelhead  trout  ( Oncorhynchus  mykiss),  westslope  cutthroat  trout 
{Oncoryhnchus  ciarki  var.  lewisi),  and  bull  trout  (Salvelinus  confluentus). 

This  BE  was  prepared  by  Robert  Rose,  Fishery  Biologist,  Salmon  National  Forest,  in  accordance  with 
direction  provided  in  Section  2672.42  of  the  Forest  Service  Manual  (FSM),  using  documentation  of 
sightings  and  suitable  habitat  during  a site-specific  field  survey  within  the  analysis  area  of  the  Moyer 
Salt  Timber  Sale,  a literature  review,  and  contact  with  professionals  knowledgeable  of  species’  habitat 
requirements.  Findings  and  conclusions  were  reviewed  by  Bruce  Smith,  Forest  Fishery  Biologist,  Dan 
Baird,  Branch  Chief;  Range,  Recreation,  Watershed  and  Wildlife  Branch,  and  John  Burns,  Forest 
Supervisor. 


Consultation  to  Date 

No  formal  or  informal  consultation  with  either  the  National  Marine  Fisheries  Service  (NMFS)  or  the  U.S. 
Fish  and  Wildlife  Service  (USFWS)  is  required  for  Biological  Evaluations  of  effects  to  sensitive  species. 
These  agencies  have  been  appraised  of  the  proposed  Moyer  Salt  timber  sale  due  to  its  potential 
effects  to  federally  endangered  Snake  River  sockeye  salmon  and  federally  endangered  Snake  River 
spring/summer  Chinook  salmon,  however.  As  separate  Biological  Assessment  has  been  prepared  to 
address  effects  to  these  species. 


Current  Management  Direction 
Anadromous  Fisheries 

The  Salmon  National  Forest  Land  and  Resource  Management  Plan  (FLRMP)(USDA  Forest  Service, 
1988)  general  objectives  for  anadromous  Management  Indicator  Species  (MIS)  fish,  including  steel- 
head,  are  to  rebuild  adult  populations  to  the  1960  level  (FLRMP  11-29).  General  Direction  Statements 
specified  in  the  FLRMP  for  MIS  species  are  actions,  measures,  or  treatments  mandated  for  inclusion 
as  integral  components  of  management  activities,  or  the  environmental  conditions  expected  to  exist 
after  such  Genera!  Direction  actions  are  implemented  (FLRMP  IV-5).  General  Direction  Statements  for 
Salmon  National  Forest  anadromous  MIS  species  mandate  maintenance  of  stream  habitats  with 
adequate  sediment-free  spawning  gravels,  channels  free  of  migration  blocks,  and  ample  instream 
flow  and  streamside  cover  (FLRMP  IV-19).  To  meet  Desired  Future  Conditions  (DFC’s)  identified  in 
the  FLRMP  for  MIS  fish  species,  aquatic  habitats  will  be  managed  at  a level  sufficient  to  meet  State 
water  quality  goals  and  maintain  habitat  capability  to  ensure  a 68  percent  fry  survival  rate  for 
anadromous  species  (FLRMP  IV-88). 

A Habitat  Management  Action  Plan  for  anadromous  fish  species  occurring  on  the  Salmon  National 
Forest  was  developed  in  1 987.  Forest  habitats  for  anadromous  fish  species  are  additionally  managed 
in  accordance  with  other  planning  documents,  including  the  USDA  Forest  Service  Western  Anadro- 
mous Fish  Habitat  Program  Plan,  1986-1990  (1986),  the  Columbia  River  Fish  Management  Plan 
(1988),  the  Columbia  Basin  Salmon  and  Steelhead  Production  Plan  for  the  Salmon  River  Sub-Basin 
(1990),  the  Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game  Fisheries  Management  Plan,  1991-1995  (1991),  the 
Columbia  River  Basin  Fish  Habitat  Management  Policy  Implementation  Guide  (1 991),  and  the  Salmon 


G2  -2 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  G2 


National  Forest  Columbia  River  Basin  Fish  Habitat  Management  Policy  Implementation  Guide  Imple- 
mentation Plan  of  1 991 . No  Regional  conservation  strategy  has  as  yet  been  developed  for  steelhead, 
however. 

Resident  Fisheries 

General  Direction  Statements  for  Salmon  National  Forest  resident  MIS  species  mandate  maintenance 
of  cool,  clean  sediment-free  stream  and  lake  habitats,  with  ample  instream  flow  and  and  streamside 
cover  (FLRMP IV-1 9).  To  meet  Desired  Future  Conditions  (DFC’s)  identified  in  the  FLRMP  for  resident 
MIS  fish  species,  aquatic  habitats  will  be  managed  at  a level  sufficient  to  meet  State  water  quality 
goals  and  maintain  habitat  capability  to  ensure  a 60  percent  juvenile  fry  survival  rate  (FLRMP  IV-88). 

A Habitat  Management  Action  Plan  for  resident  fish  species  occurring  on  the  Salmon  National  Forest 
was  developed  in  1 987.  Forest  habitats  for  resident  fish  are  additionally  managed  in  accordance  with 
(1990),  the  Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game  Fisheries  Management  Plan,  1991-1995  (1991).  No 
Regional  conservation  strategy  has  as  yet  been  developed  for  either  westslope  cutthroat  trout  or  bull 
trout. 


Proposed  Action 

As  part  of  the  Forest  Plan  implementation  process,  the  Cobalt  Ranger  District  of  the  Salmon  National 
Forest  is  proposing  the  Moyer  Salt  and  Salt  Creek  Timber  Sale  (hereafter  referred  to  as  the  Moyer 
Salt  Timber  Sale)  within  the  T aylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area  (No.  1 3-902)  (See  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale 
EIS,  Figure  1).  Within  an  array  of  six  action  alternatives,  the  Forest  proposes  to  construct  between 
15.7  and  17.8  miles  of  road,  and  harvest  between  3.75  and  6.90  mmbf  of  timber  on  440  to  847  acres 
within  the  upper  Woodtick  Creek  watershed  and  the  upper  Salt  and  "Perm*  Creek  drainages  of  the 
Moyer  Creek  watershed  (See  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  EIS). These  proposed  actions  are  designed  to 
help  achieve  the  silvicultural  goals  and  objectives  of  the  1 988  Salmon  National  Forest  Land  and 
Resource  Management  Plan  (Forest  Plan)(USDA  Forest  Service,  1988)  to  help  satisfy  the  short-term 
demand  for  timber  while  providing  for  community  stability  and  maintenance  of  a continuous  supply 
of  timber  for  the  future.  As  required  under  the  National  Environmental  Policy  Act,,  a No  Action 
alternative  is  additionally  included  within  the  array  of  proposed  alternatives. 


Existing  Environment 

Affected  Streams 

The  analysis  area  encompasses  portions  of  the  Woodtick  Creek  and  Moyer  Creek  watersheds.  The 
32.9  square  mile  Moyer  Creek  basin  and  16.0  square  mile  Woodtick  Creek  basin  lie  within  the  529 
square  mile  Panther  Creek  drainage  system,  a major  tributary  of  the  mainstem  Salmon  River.  Within 
the  Woodtick  Creek  drainage  system,  proposed  activities  have  the  potential  to  impact  mainstem 
Woodtick  Creek  and  the  lower  reach  of  Goodluck  Creek.  Both  streams  are  perennial  and  possess 
sufficient  flow  volume  and  aquatic  habitat  capability  to  support  substantial  fisheries  resources.  The 
analysis  area  also  encompasses  an  unnamed,  largely  intermittent  tributary  stream  which  enters 
Woodtick  Creek  approximately  1.7  miles  downstream  of  the  mouth  of  Goodluck  Creek  (Township  19 
N,  Range  19  E,  Section  3)  (Figure  2-1).  Within  the  Moyer  Creek  drainage,  the  analysis  area  encom- 
passes Salt  Creek  and  an  unnamed  perennial  stream  locally  known  as  'Perm’  Creek,  which  joins 
Moyer  Creek  in  Township  19  N,  Range  18  E,  Section  24.  Salt  Creek  is  of  sufficient  size  in  its  lower 
reaches  to  provide  supplemental  spawning  and/or  rearing  habitat  to  fisheries  resources  in  the  Moyer 
Creek  drainage  and  may  additionally  support  a minor  resident  population  through  its  mid  reaches. 
The  smaller  'Perm'  Creek  appears  to  provide  only  marginal  spawning  or  rearing  capabilities  in  its 


G2  -3 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  E1S 


Appendix  G2 


lowermost  reach.  Specific  alternatives  also  encompass  portions  of  the  Pete’s  Gulch  drainage,  which 
is  not  believed  to  support  fish  life. 

Affected  Sensitive  Species 

Listed  R4  sensitive  aquatic  species  known  to  occur  within  the  Panther  Creek  system  include  steel- 
head  ( Oncorhynchus  mykiss ),  westslope  cutthroat  trout  ( Oncorhynchus  clarki  var.  lewisi),  and  bull 
trout  (Salvelinus  confluentus).  Current  information  from  Salmon  National  Forest  aquatic  habitat  and 
resource  files,  however,  indicate  that  bull  trout  are  the  only  R4  sensitive  fish  species  currently  utilizing 
the  Moyer  Creek  and  Woodtick  Creek  portions  of  this  system. 

Anadromous  Fisheries 

The  Panther  Creek  drainage  system  was  historically  a major  producer  of  both  summer  steelhead  and 
spring/summer  Chinook  salmon  (Reiser,  1986).  Utilization  of  Panther  Creek  and  its  tributaries  by 
anadromous  salmonids  began  to  decline  in  the  1 940s,  however,  and  has  been  severely  limited  since 
the  1 960s  by  chemical  pollution  of  mid  and  lower  mainstem  waters  that  is  attributable  to  operation 
of  the  Blackbird  Mine  (Reiser,  1986,  Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game,  1965).  Despite  these 
mainstem  water  quality  problems,  Panther  Creek  and  its  historically  utilized  tributaries,  including 
Moyer  and  Woodtick  Creeks,  continue  to  be  regarded  as  potentially  viable  producers  of  anadromous 
fish  (Northwest  Power  Planning  Council,  1991).  The  Forest  Plan  calls  for  continued  management 
directed  toward  anadromous  stocks  in  anticipation  of  correction  of  mine  drainage  probfems  and 
recovery  of  mainstem  water  quality  (USDA  Forest  Service,  1 988).  Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game 
management  prescriptions  for  the  two  streams  calls  for  a preservation  management  strategy  for 
anadromous  fish  stocks,  which  maintains  a harvest  closure  and  may  supplement  natural  recruitment 
with  possible  stockings  of  fry  or  fingerlings  (Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game,  1991). 

In  terms  of  potential  production  capability,  the  Moyer  Creek  drainage  has  been  identified  as  the  most 
important  steelhead  spawning  tributary  of  the  Panther  Creek  drainage  system,  with  production 
capability  estimated  at  7,300  srnoits  annually.  Annual  steelhead  production  capability  within  the 
Woodtick  Creek  system  has  been  estimated  at  1 ,300  smolts  (Northwest  Power  Planning  Council, 
1991). 


Resident  Fisheries 

The  mainstem  reaches  of  Woodtick  Creek  and  Moyer  Creek  both  support  well-established  popula- 
tions of  resident  salmonids.  Bull  trout  are  known  to  be  present  in  both  streams,  along  with  resident 
populations  of  rainbow  trout  (Buram  et  al,  1990).  Mountain  whitefish  additionally  utilize  mainstem 
habitats  within  Moyer  Creek  (Burum  et  al,  1990,  amended).  Although  westslope  cutthroat  trout  are 
infrequently  caught  in  the  mainstem  reaches  of  Panther  Creek  above  the  mouth  of  Moyer  Creek 
(Tambe,  1989,  personal  communication),  no  evidence  of  direct  utilization  of  either  Moyer  Creek  or 
Woodtick  Creek  by  this  species  can  be  found. 

Resident  trout  production  capabilities  of  Woodtick  Creek  and  Moyer  Creek  are  each  estimated  at  40 
pounds  of  fish  per  surface  acre  (May,  1 985).  Mainstem  Moyer  Creek,  with  an  existing  road  paralleling 
approximately  half  its  length,  receives  significant  fishing  pressure  during  the  summer  months.  Due 
to  closure  of  Forest  Service  Road  1 07,  angling  opportunities  in  Woodtick  Creek  are  accessed  only 
by  foot  or  horseback  from  Panther  Creek  via  the  Woodtick  T rail,  which  diverges  from  the  stream  below 
the  analysis  area. 

Woodtick  Creek  Fish  Habitat 

Within  the  lower  portion  of  the  analysis  area  (Township  1 9 N,  Range  1 9 E,  Section  4),  Woodtick  Creek 
is  a moderate  gradient  B type  channel  (Rosgen,  1985)  with  an  average  width  slightly  greater  than  12 


G2  -4 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  G2 


feet.  The  stream  has  a mean  annual  discharge  of  approximately  nine  cubic  feet  per  second  (cfs),  an 
estimated  peak  discharge  of  80  cfs,  and  mean  monthly  flows  ranging  between  approximately  three 
and  36  cfs,  all  as  measured  near  the  streams  confluence  with  Panther  Creek  (Rose,  1 988).  The  stream 
exhibits  a diverse  variety  of  microhabitats  produced  largely  as  a result  of  an  abundance  of  large 
woody  debris  within  the  channel.  Lateral  scour  pools  and  dammed  pools  with  water  depths  of  up  to 
three  feet  are  common  and  provide  abundant  adult  rearing  habitat.  Numerous  shallow  edgewater 
areas  and  backwater  pools  contribute  to  provide  dispersed  rearing  habitat  for  juvenile  life  stages. 

Stream  substrates  in  this  area  are  dominated  by  angular  quartzite  rubble,  with  smaller  gravel  accumu- 
lations behind  obstructions  providing  small  pockets  of  spawning  habitat.  Gravels  that  are  relatively 
free  of  fine-grained  sediment  reflect  the  largely  undisturbed  nature  of  this  portion  of  the  drainage. 
Sediment  core  sampling  conducted  during  the  1 992  field  season  revealed  a mean  of  1 5.0  percent 
fines-by-depth  at  likely  steelhead  spawning  sites.  This  level  of  substrate  fines  is  among  the  lowest 
value  recorded  for  Salmon  National  Forest  streams,  falling  well  below  Forest  Plan  standards  and 
guidelines  of  less  than  20.0  percent  fines  for  anadromous  fish  spawning  habitat  and  less  than  28.7 
percent  for  resident  fish  spawning  habitat  (FLRMP 11-21 , 11-23).  This  stream  is  one  of  few  on  the  Salmon 
National  Forest  whose  substrate  quality  exceeds  maximum  biotic  potential  for  resident  fisheries 
production,  identified  in  the  FLRMP  as  those  streams  displaying  substrate  fines-by-depth  of  less  than 
approximately  18.5  percent  (FLRMP  11-23). 

Despite  a low  bank  rock  content,  excellent  streambank  stability  is  afforded  by  a well-established 
carpet  of  mosses  extending  to  the  water’s  edge.  Streambanks  show  no  evidence  of  past  ungulate 
damage.  In  this  reach,  tall  Englemann  spruce  within  the  valley  bottom  provide  over  40  percent  midday 
stream  shading  and  up  to  75  percent  morning  and  afternoon  shading.  Minor  amounts  of  supplemen- 
tal shade  are  provided  by  understory  vegetation. 

An  existing  60-inch  culvert  on  Road  #107  in  the  lower  portion  of  the  analysis  area  (Township  20  N, 
Range  1 9 E,  Section  32)  currently  poses  a barrier  to  upstream  anadromous  and  resident  fish  passage 
under  high  water  conditions. 

Within  Township  19  N,  Range  19  E,  Section  3,  a large  blowdown  event  has  removed  most  of  the  tall 
valley  bottom  spruce,  reducing  stream  shading  to  less  than  1 0 percent  through  a quarter-mile-long 
reach.  Shade  canopy  in  this  area  is  provided  intermittently  by  1 0 to  20  foot  tall  subalpine  fir,  with  the 
larger  accumulations  of  downfall  providing  localized  shade  from  direct  sun. 

Above  the  blowdown  area  stream  shading  of  up  to  70  percent  is  restored  by  a dense  spruce  canopy. 
Stream  character  and  aquatic  habitat  in  this  reach  is  similar  to  that  in  the  lower  area,  although  average 
stream  width  is  reduced  to  approximately  six  to  eight  feet.  Dammed  and  lateral  scour  pools  as  much 
as  two  feet  deep  are  abundant. 

Goodluck  Creek  displays  significant  channel  migration  at  its  confluence  with  Woodtick  Creek.  Braid- 
ing of  the  stream  due  to  flow  obstruction  by  downfall  materials  has  resulted  in  an  undefined  channel 
mouth,  which  drops  three  vertical  feet  into  the  Woodtick  Creek  channel.  No  pool  has  formed  at  this 
confluence,  effectively  precluding  upstream  passage  from  Woodtick  Creek  into  Goodluck  Creek 
during  low  flow  periods. 

Above  their  confluence  Woodtick  and  Goodluck  Creeks  are  about  equal  in  size  and  character,  with 
average  stream  widths  of  approximately  five  to  six  feet  and  abundant  debris-formed  pools  as  much 
as  one  and  one-half  feet  deep.  Substrate  materials  in  both  streams  in  this  area  become  dominated 
by  cobbles  with  minor  amounts  of  gravel.  Within  1 00  yards  of  its  mouth,  Goodluck  Creek  exhibits  a 
short  but  sharp  increase  in  stream  gradient  before  once  again  flattening  out  in  the  vicinity  of  the 
proposed  road  crossing.  Above  the  confluence  of  Goodluck  Creek,  Woodtick  generally  retains  the 
step  cascade  and  high  gradient  riffle  characteristics  of  the  stream  below  the  confluence,  but  displays 
significant  regions  of  channel  braiding  which  may  define  the  upper  limit  of  fish  passage. 


G2-5 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sate  Final  ESS 


Appendix  G2 


Minimum  and  maximum  water  temperatures  recorded  at  the  mouth  of  Woodtick  Creek  between  June 
and  October  1992  ranged  from  36  to  61  degrees  Fahrenheit  (Carter,  1992).  Beneficial  use  tempera- 
ture criteria  for  Coldwater  Biota  (IDAPA  16.01 .2250, 04. c)  was  met  during  all  months  sampled.  Tem- 
perature criteria  for  Salmonid  Spawning  (IDAPA  1 6.01 ,2250,05.c)  was  met  for  the  entire  fall  spawning 
and  incubation  period,  and  all  but  the  very  end  of  the  spring  spawning  and  incubation  period 
identified  for  waters  of  the  Salmon  National  Forest  (Idaho  Department  of  Water  Resources,  1 975).  The 
brief  exceedence  of  Salmonid  Spawning  beneficial  use  criteria  to  a temperature  maxima  of  61 
degrees  during  the  latter  half  of  June  is  most  likely  attributable  to  an  unseasonable  transitory  warm 
spell,  as  maxima  for  the  July  sampling  period  fell  back  to  50  degrees.  pH  readings  taken  during  this 
same  June  through  October  sampling  period  ranged  between  7.5  and  8.0  (Carter,  1992),  falling  well 
within  the  range  of  6.7  to  8.2  which  encompasses  90  percent  of  the  freshwater  areas  harboring  good 
aquatic  faunas  (Leitritz  and  Lewis,  1976),  as  well  as  within  the  pH  criteria  range  for  both  Cold  Water 
Biota  (IDAPA  16.01. 2250, 04.b)  and  Salmonid  Spawning  (IDAPA  16.01. 2250, 05.b).  Dissolved  oxygen 
content  at  the  mouth  of  Woodtick  Creek  also  exceeded  the  6 milligram  per  liter/90  percent  saturation 
beneficial  use  criteria  for  both  Cold  Water  Biota  (IDAPA  16.01. 2250, 04.a)  and  Salmonid  Spawning 
(IDAPA  1 6.01 .2250, 05.a)  throughout  the  sampling  period,  ranging  from  nine  to  1 1 milligrams  per  liter 
(Carter,  1992). 

The  benthic  macroinvertebrate  communities  of  Woodtick  and  Goodluck  Creeks  in  the  proposed  sale 
area  are  comprised  primarily  of  stonefly  and  mayfly  species,  indicating  both  cold,  well  oxygenated 
water  of  good  chemical  quality,  and  clean  substrates  relatively  free  of  sediment  deposition.  Caddisfly 
species  appear  to  be  somewhat  underrepresented  in  these  streams  (Rose,  1989-1990;  1991). 
Lafontaine  (1981)  has  identified  both  extreme  seasonal  flow  variations  or  consistently  cold  water  as 
primary  factors  limiting  caddis  populations  within  trout  streams.  Baseline  aquatic  habitat  data  collect- 
ed during  the  1 992  field  season  (Carter,  1 992)  suggests  that  this  latter  factor  is  primarily  responsible 
for  the  apparently  depressed  caddis  populations  within  Woodtick  Creek. 

Moyer  Creek  Basin  Fish  Habitat 

Salt  Creek  and  "Perm"  Creek  are  both  small  perennial  streams  whose  fisheries  habitats  are  largely 
limited  to  their  lowermost  reaches  and  where  low  gradient  gravel-bottomed  riffles  and  small  pools 
provide  supplemental  spawning  and  nursery  habitat  to  mainstem  Moyer  Creek  fish  populations. 
Although  nursery  habitats  could  be  used  by  both  resident  and  anadromous  stocks,  spawning 
habitats  in  these  lower  reaches  are  more  suitable  for  resident  fish.  Additional  minor  habitat  for 
resident  fish  populations  may  occur  in  the  middle  reaches  of  Salt  Creek. 

The  existing  culverts  near  the  mouths  of  Salt  and  "Perm’  Creeks  have  not  been  identified  as  passage 
barriers.  Spawning  and  rearing  reaches  above  these  culverts  appear  to  be  more  accessible  to  the 
spring-spawning  rainbow  trout  than  to  fall-spawning  bull  trout,  due  to  improved  passage  conditions 
during  the  spring  runoff  period.  Low  flow  access  is  particularly  questionable  in  ’Perm"  Creek,  which 
exhibits  significant  braiding  immediately  above  the  culvert. 

While  providing  relatively  minor  amounts  of  supplemental  habitat  to  the  Moyer  Creek  system,  both 
Salt  Creek  and  "Perm"  Creek  serve  important  contributory  functions  to  the  maintenance  of  water 
quality  within  the  larger  Moyer  Creek  system.  In  its  lower  reaches  (Township  20  N,  Range  18  E, 
Section  35),  mainstem  Moyer  Creek  alternates  between  moderate  and  low  gradient  B and  C chan- 
nels, with  an  average  bankfull  width  of  approximately  21  feet.  The  stream  has  a mean  annual 
discharge  of  approximately  19  cubic  feet  per  second  (cfs),  an  estimated  peak  discharge  of  85  cfs, 
and  mean  monthly  flows  ranging  between  approximately  six  and  77  cfs,  all  as  measured  approxi- 
mately one  eighth  mile  above  the  streams  confluence  with  Panther  Creek  (Rose,  1 988).  Minimum  and 
maximum  water  temperatures  recorded  at  the  mouth  of  Moyer  Creek  between  June  and  October 
1992  ranged  from  32  to  54  degrees  Fahrenheit  (Carter,  1992).  Beneficial  use  temperature  criteria  for 
Coldwater  Biota  (IDAPA  16.01. 2250, 04.c)  was  met  during  all  months  sampled,  but  temperature 
criteria  for  Salmonid  Spawning  (IDAPA  16.01. 2250, 05.c)  was  exceeded  during  both  the  end  of  the 


G2  - 6 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  G2 


spring  spawning  and  incubation  period  and  the  early  and  mid  portions  of  the  fall  spawning  and 
incubation  period  identified  for  waters  of  the  Salmon  National  Forest  (Idaho  Department  of  Water 
Resources,  1975).  The  brief  exceedence  of  Salmonid  Spawning  beneficial  use  temperature  criteria 
during  the  latter  half  of  June  is  most  likely  attributable  to  an  unseasonable  transitory  warm  spell,  while 
the  exceedence  during  July,  August,  and  September  reflects  the  more  open  nature  of  the  Moyer 
Creek  stream  channel,  which  exacerbated  drought-induced  conditions  of  summer  low  flow  warming. 
pH  readings  taken  during  this  same  June  through  October  sampling  period  ranged  between  7.0  and 
7.7  (Carter,  1992),  falling  well  within  the  range  of  6.7  to  8.2  which  encompasses  90  percent  of  the 
freshwater  areas  harboring  good  aquatic  faunas  (Leitritz  and  Lewis,  1976),  as  well  as  within  the  pH 
criteria  range  for  both  Cold  Water  Biota  (IDAPA  16.01. 2250, 04.b)  and  Salmonid  Spawning  (IDAPA 
16.01. 2250, 05.b).  Dissolved  oxygen  content  at  the  mouth  of  Moyer  Creek  also  exceeded  the  6 
milligram  per  liter/90  percent  saturation  beneficial  use  criteria  for  both  Cold  Water  Biota  (IDAPA 
1 6.01 .2250, 04.a)  and  Salmonid  Spawning  (IDAPA  1 6.01 .2250, 05.a)  throughout  the  sampling  period, 
ranging  from  nine  to  11  milligrams  per  liter  (Carter,  1992). 

Past  Actions  That  Affect  the  Present  Condition 

Previous  timber  management  activities  within  the  Moyer-Salt  Timber  Sale  analysis  area  include  the 
1988  Tick  Creek  Timber  Sale,  which  harvested  23.0  percent  of  the  Little  Woodtick  Creek  drainage. 
This  level  of  of  harvest  has  been  shown  to  produce  significant  increases  in  water  yield  within  a 
drainage  (Troendle  and  Leaf,  1980,  as  cited  by  Troendle,  1982),  and  was  believed  to  be  the  factor 
responsible  for  an  apparent  increase  in  peak  runoff  flow  within  the  Little  Woodtick  Creek  drainage 
during  the  1991  water  year  (Elizabeth  Rieffenberger,  1992,  personal  communication).  Within  the 
larger  Woodtick  Creek  drainage,  the  Tick  Creek  Sale  corresponded  to  a 5.2  percent  harvest  of  the 
total  drainage  basin.  The  increased  magnitude  of  peak  flow  observed  within  the  Little  Woodtick  Creek 
drainage  was  not  believed  to  have  produced  any  deleterious  impacts  to  mainstem  Woodtick  Creek 
(Elizabeth  Rieffenberger,  1 992,  personal  communication)  due  to  variation  in  the  timing  of  peak  runoff 
between  the  two  streams. 


Effects  of  the  Proposed  Project 

Potential  Effects  of  Timber  Harvest  Activities 

The  potential  effects  of  timber  harvest  activities  on  fisheries  resources  are  primarily  related  to  impacts 
on  stream  substrates,  fish  migration  opportunities,  riparian  area  integrity,  and  streamflow  magnitude 
and  timing.  Forest  transportation  systems  which  are  poorly  designed  or  lacking  in  effective  mitigation 
measures  can  have  significant  effects  on  fish  and  their  habitats  as  a result  of  direct  deposition  of 
sediment  into  stream  channels  (Yee  and  Roelofs,  1980).  Incremental  sediment  contribution  per  unit 
area  as  a result  of  poor  road  design  can  potentially  exceed  that  from  all  other  land  management 
activities,  including  log  skidding  and  yarding  (Yee  and  Roelofs,  1980).  Excess  sediment  production 
can  adversely  affect  fish  habitat  by  reducing  substrate  permeability  (Wicket,  1958;  Mcneil  and  Ahnell, 
1964),  impeding  or  preventing  fry  emergence  (Koski,  1966;  Bjornn,  1969),  and  reducing  rearing  and 
overwintering  habitat  (Phillips,  1970).  Increased  sedimentation  of  stream  substrates  are  also  associ- 
ated with  decreased  diversity  of  cover  for  bottom  fauna  (Sprules,  1947;  Kimble  and  Wesche,  1975). 
Massive  increases  in  sediment  production  may  exceed  the  stream’s  ability  to  transport  the  load  that 
has  been  introduced  (Leopold,  1964). 

Improperly  designed  road  culverts  associated  with  stream  crossings  have  the  potential  to  create 
barriers  to  fish  migration,  usually  because  of  excessive  outfall  heights  or  water  velocities,  insufficient 
water  depths,  lack  of  resting  pools,  or  combinations  of  these  factors  (Evans  and  Johnson,  1 974;  Yee 
and  Roelofs,  1980). 


G2-7 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sate  Final  ESS 


Appendix  G2 


Riparian  vegetation  serves  an  important  role  in  stabilizing  banks,  providing  summer  stream  shading 
and  winter  thermal  cover,  contributing  organic  matter  and  terrestrial  insects  to  the  stream,  and 
serving  as  a buffer  against  sediment  transport  into  stream  channels  (Meehan  et  al,  1 977;  Yee  and 
Roelofs,  1 980).  Improper  timber  harvest  techniques  which  result  in  the  removal  of  riparian  vegetation 
or  streamside  shade  trees  have  the  potential  to  increase  summer  water  temperatures,  decrease 
winter  water  temperatures,  and  adversely  affect  egg  incubation  (Greene,  1950;  Chapman,  1962). 
Removal  of  overhanging  vegetative  cover  can  result  in  increased  predation  and  reduction  of  pre- 
ferred juvenile  salmonid  microhabitats  (Chapman,  1966;  Allen,  1969),  and  accelerated  formation  of 
anchor  ice  (Bruce  Smith,  1991,  personal  communication). 

Timber  harvest  encompassing  more  than  20  to  30  percent  of  a drainage’s  total  basin  area  has  been 
shown  to  be  capable  of  producing  modifications  to  peak  runoff  flow  timing  and  magnitude  (Troendle 
and  Leaf,  1980,  as  cited  by  Troendle,  1982).  Extensive  timber  harvest  activity  within  a drainage  has 
the  potential  to  increase  water  yields  and  peak  flows  to  a point  that  channel  erosion  occurs  (Rosgen, 
1978). 


Direct  and  Indirect  Effects  of  Alternative  1 (No  Action) 

No  road  construction  or  timber  harvest  activities  would  be  implemented  under  this  alternative.  There 
would  be  no  direct  or  indirect  effects  on  fisheries  resources  within  the  analysis  area  due  to  activities 
associated  with  timber  harvest.  The  aquatic  habitats  of  Woodtick  Creek,  Goodluck  Creek,  Salt  Creek, 
and  ■Perm"  Creek  would  remain  generally  unchanged  from  conditions  described  in  Chapter  3,  except 
for  minor  natural  changes  in  channel  structures  related  to  continued  introduction  of  large  woody 
debris  as  trees  die  and  fall  down.  Naturally-occurring  events  such  as  fire  or  floods  may  cause 
changes  to  fish  habitat  as  a result  of  vegetation  disturbance,  increases  in  flow,  or  other  events.  Angler 
access  and  harvest  of  resident  fish  species  in  Woodtick  Creek,  Goodluck  Creek,  and  Salt  Creek 
would  remain  essentially  unchanged  from  current  levels.  Future  utilization  of  steelhead  habitat  within 
the  Woodtick  Creek  drainage,  and  steelhead  and  Chinook  salmon  habitat  within  the  Moyer  Creek 
drainage,  would  be  dependent  upon  improvement  of  water  quality  in  Panther  Creek.  Under  the  No 
Action  alternative,  the  existing  culvert  at  the  crossing  of  Woodtick  Creek  by  F.S.  Road  1 07  in  Township 
20  N,  Range  19  E,  Section  32  (Figure  2-1)  would  not  be  repaired  or  replaced  through  timber-related 
funding,  and  would  continue  to  be  a barrier  to  upstream  migration  of  both  anadromous  and  resident 
fish  unless  scheduled  for  repair  or  replacement  via  Fisheries  Department  project  funding.  Due  to  the 
current  emphasis  on  correction  of  migration  barriers  on  streams  supporting  Chinook  salmon  stocks, 
it  is  unlikely  that  restoration  of  potential  steelhead  passage  at  the  Woodtick  culvert  site  via  Fisheries 
funding  would  receive  a high  priority  at  this  time  (Bruce  Smith,  1993,  personal  communication). 

Direct  and  Indirect  Effects  Common  to  All  Action  Alternatives 

Primary  considerations  of  any  assessment  of  potential  effects  of  road  construction  and  timber  harvest 
on  TES  fish  species  are  sedimentation  of  stream  substrates,  degradation  of  riparian  area  integrity, 
impairment  of  migration  opportunities,  and  modification  of  annual  streamflow  patterns.  Salmon 
National  Forest  soil  and  water  Best  Management  Practices  (BMPs)  and  site-specific  soil,  water,  and 
fisheries  mitigation  measures  identified  in  Chapter  II  of  the  Moyer-Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  EIS  are 
designed  to  1)  minimize  and  intercept  sediment  generated  as  a result  of  road  construction  or  timber 
harvest  before  it  can  enter  stream  channels,  2)  maintain  riparian  integrity  to  ensure  adequate  shading 
of  stream  channels  and  retention  of  protective  overhead  cover,  3)  accommodate  species-specific 
migration  needs  at  transportation  route  crossings  of  streams  containing  fisheries  resources,  and  4) 
constrain  basin  harvest  intensity  to  levels  which  do  not  produce  significant  modification  of  peak 
streamflow  intensities  and/or  timing. 

Road  construction  and  timber  harvest  activities  proposed  for  this  timber  sale  will  be  concentrated  to 
a large  extent  on  mid  or  upper  slopes  of  the  Woodtick,  Salt  and  "Perm'  Creek  drainages.  Only  six  of 
32  proposed  cutting  units  witt  be  located  at  distances  within  200  feet  of  active  stream  channels.  At 


G2-8 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  G2 


these  sites,  filter  strip  widths  consistent  with  Forest  Plan  direction  will  be  employed  to  intercept 
sediment  before  reaching  stream  channels.  Additionally,  these  buffers  will  be  maintained  in  an  uncut 
status  to  retain  existing  ground  cover  within  riparian  areas,  ensure  adequate  shading  of  active  stream 
channels,  maintain  streambank  stability,  and  provide  for  future  recruitment  of  large  organic  debris. 

Under  the  various  proposed  alternatives,  stream  crossings  will  be  required  on  Woodtick,  Goodluck, 
Perm,  and  Salt  Creek.  At  all  stream  crossings  where  fish  are  known  or  suspected  to  occur,  design 
criteria  will  ensure  yearround  fish  passage  opportunities.  Installation  activities  will  be  timed  to  precede 
the  bull  trout  spawning  period,  and  will  be  consistent  with  Forest  guidelines  (see  'Performance 
Criteria  to  be  Observed  to  Protect  Stream  Channels',  Appendix  C)  to  ensure  minimal  water  quality 
and  stream  substrate  impacts  below  construction  sites.  Additionally,  an  existing  60  inch  culvert  on 
Woodtick  Creek  (Section  32  of  Township  20  N,  Range  19  E)  which  currently  presents  a barrier  to 
migration  of  both  resident  and  anadromous  fish  is  to  be  repaired  or  replaced  under  a variety  of 
funding  mechanisms  dependent  upon  the  selected  action  alternative.  Correction  of  this  barrier  will 
reopen  access  to  potential  steelhead  spawning  habitat  within  the  upper  reaches  of  Woodtick  Creek. 
Localized  construction-related  impacts  to  stream  substrates  at  this  site  are  expected  to  be  ameliorat- 
ed within  the  time  frame  of  natural  or  enhanced  recovery  of  mainstem  Panther  Creek  water  quality. 

Under  the  most  timber-intensive  proposed  harvest  alternative,  total  basin  harvest  would  be  limited 
to  3.0  percent  of  the  Woodtick  Creek  drainage,  14.3  percent  of  the  Sait  Creek  drainage,  and  14.2 
percent  of  the  "Perm'  Creek  drainage.  This  level  of  basin  disturbance  would  be  substantially  below 
the  20  to  30  percent  regarded  as  capable  of  producing  significantly  increased  water  yield  (Troendle 
and  Leaf,  1980,  as  cited  by  Troendle,  1982)  in  the  Woodtick  Creek  drainage,  and  would  approach 
but  not  reach  these  levels  in  the  previously  undisturbed  Salt  and  'Perm"  Creek  drainages  of  the  Moyer 
Creek  system.  Proposed  harvest  prescriptions  under  other  alternatives  identified  within  the  Moyer- 
Salt  Draft  EIS  would  impact  substantially  less  of  the  Salt  and  "Perm”  Creek  drainage  basins. 

Direct  and  Indirect  Effects  Specific  to  Alternative  2 

This  alternative  would  require  road  crossings  of  Woodtick  Creek,  Goodluck  Creek,  Salt  Creek,  'Perm' 
Creek,  and  an  unnamed  tributary  of  Woodtick  Creek.  Fish  passage  at  the  existing  road  culvert  on  FS 
Road  107  (T ownship  20  N,  Range  19  E,  Section  32)  would  be  restored  in  association  with  Knudson- 
Vandenberg  (KV)  funding,  while  construction  design  would  maintain  fish  passage  at  the  required  new 
crossings  of  upper  Woodtick  Creek  (Township  19  N,  Range  19  E,  Section  11)  and  Goodluck  Creek 
(same  legal) (Figure  2-2).  Under  the  transportation  system  associated  with  this  alternative,  the  Salt 
Creek  crossing  would  be  located  in  the  headwaters  area  of  the  drainage  (Township  19  N,  Range  19 
E,  Section  16)  (Figure  2-2).  The  natural  diminished  aquatic  habitat  capability  at  and  above  this  location 
does  not  warrant  a crossing  design  which  would  ensure  fish  passage  at  this  site.  A single  crossing 
of  'Perm  Creek'  would  be  required  in  Township  1 9 N,  Range  1 9 E,  Section  1 7 (Figure  2-2)  under  this 
alternative.  Fish  passage  capability  would  not  be  maintained  at  this  crossing  due  to  lack  of  aquatic 
habitat  capability  at  and  above  this  sites.  A crossing  structure  would  additionally  be  required  across 
an  unnamed  tributary  of  Woodtick  Creek  (Township  19  N,  Range  19  E,  Section  10)(Figure  2-2). 
Although  this  tributary  is  live  at  the  proposed  crossing  location,  it  is  intermittent  throughout  the 
majority  of  its  length  and  is  not  believed  to  support  fish  life.  Installation  of  standard  culvert  designs 
at  the  crossing  locations  of  Salt  Creek,  "Perm'  Creek,  and  the  unnamed  Woodtick  Creek  tributary 
would  have  no  long-term  impact  on  the  fisheries  resources  of  the  Moyer  or  Woodtick  Creek 
drainages.  Adherence  to  Forest  Plan  standards  and  guidelines  would  minimize  short-term  sediment 
and  turbidity-related  impacts  to  downstream  water  quality  during  construction  activities  at  all  crossing 
locations. 

BOISED  modeling  of  the  transportation  system  and  harvest  prescriptions  associated  with  this  alterna- 
tive indicates  that  sediment  delivery  rates  to  Moyer  Creek  and  Woodtick  Creek  would  fall  within  the 
middle  of  the  range  predicted  for  the  array  of  alternatives,  being  higher  than  the  predicted  rates  for 
Alternatives  1 and  5,  but  lower  than  the  rates  predicted  for  Alternatives  3,  4,  and  6 (Table  11-2). 


G2-9 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  G2 


Mitigation  measures  identified  in  Chapter  2,  and  applicable  soil  and  water  Best  Management  Prac- 
tices (BMPs)  are  expected  to  be  fully  successful  in  protecting  the  aquatic  habitats  of  these  two 
drainages.  Results  and  interpretation  of  BOISED  sediment  modeling  are  discussed  in  greater  detail 
within  the  Hydrology  Effects  section  of  the  project  FEIS. 

Timber  harvest  activities  would  impact  9.1  percent  of  the  Salt  Creek  drainage  and  1 1 .3  percent  of  the 
“Perm'  Creek  drainage  under  this  alternative.  As  these  levels  of  basin  harvest  are  well  below  the  20 
to  30  percent  basin  harvest  threshold  levels  observed  to  result  in  significant  changes  in  annual  water 
yield  or  peak  flow  intensity  (T roendle  and  Leaf,  1980,  as  cited  by  Troendle,  1982),  no  impacts  to  the 
natural  flow  regimes  of  these  streams  would  be  expected  under  this  alternative. 

Direct  and  Indirect  Effects  Specific  to  Alternative  3 

The  transportation  system  for  this  alternative  would  require  two  crossings  of  "Perm'  Creek  rather  than 
the  single  crossing  required  under  alternative  2.  An  upper  crossing  would  be  located  in  Township 
1 9 N,  Range  1 9 E,  Section  1 7,  as  in  Alternative  2,  and  a lower  crossing  would  be  located  in  Township 
19  N,  Range  19  E,  Section  18  (Figure  2-3).  Fish  passage  would  not  be  maintained  at  either  of  these 
two  crossings,  due  to  the  lack  of  suitable  fish  habitat  at  and  above  these  sites.  Crossing  locations 
of  upper  Woodtick  Creek,  Goodluck  Creek,  and  the  unnamed  Woodtick  Creek  tributary  would  remain 
as  described  for  Alternative  2,  with  fish  passage  capabilities  being  maintained  at  the  upper  Woodtick 
Creek  and  Goodluck  Creek  sites.  Fish  passage  at  the  existing  FS  Road  107  culvert  (Township  20  N, 
Range  1 9 E,  Section  32,  Figure  11-3)  would  be  restored  in  association  with  prescribed  road  reconstruc- 
tion operations. 

This  alternative  would  additionally  relocate  the  Salt  Creek  stream  crossing  to  Township  1 9 N,  Range 
1 9 E,  Section  7,  and  the  crossing  of  the  unnamed  Woodtick  Creek  tributary  to  Township  1 9 N,  Range 
19  E,  Section  10  (Figure  11-3).  Because  it  would  be  located  in  the  middle  reaches  of  the  drainage,  the 
Salt  Creek  stream  crossing  must  be  designed  to  ensure  unrestricted  fish  passage  under  this  alterna- 
tive. 

Culvert  installation  operations  would  temporarily  increase  water  turbidities  in  Woodtick  Creek,  Good- 
luck Creek,  the  unnamed  Woodtick  Creek  tributary,  Salt  Creek  and  "Perm'  Creek  at  and  below  these 
crossing  locations  and  may  produce  short-term  sediment  impacts  to  localized  areas  below  these 
sites.  Installation  of  these  crossing  structures  in  accordance  with  "Performance  Criteria  to  be  Ob- 
served to  Protect  Stream  Channels'  (FSM  2505.1-2,  FEIS  Appendix  B)  would  minimize  the  spatial  and 
temporal  scope  of  installation  impacts.  The  narrow  valley  bottom  and  steep  sideslopes  adjacent  to 
the  proposed  Salt  Creek  crossing  preclude  flat,  perpendicular  approaches  to  this  site,  however. 
Further,  these  steep  sideslopes  inhibit  the  implementation  of  adequate  soil  and  water  mitigation 
measures  between  the  road  fill  slope  and  the  Salt  Creek  stream  channel.  These  site  specific  limita- 
tions, coupled  with  the  determination  of  BOISED,  which  indicates  that  alternative  would  produce  the 
greatest  longterm  sediment  delivery  rates  of  the  seven  alternatives  analyzed,  together  produce  an 
increased  risk  of  surface  erosion  and  consequently  an  associated  increased  risk  of  failure  to  continu- 
ously meet  State  water  quality  standards  within  Salt  Creek  stream  channel  (see  FEIS  Hydrology 
Effects).  As  this  crossing  is  located  lower  in  the  Salt  Creek  drainage  than  those  proposed  under  other 
action  alternatives,  any  long  term  stream  sedimentation  resulting  from  unchecked  overland  erosion 
would  impact  potential  rearing  habitats  within  that  stream  and,  to  a lesser  degree,  Moyer  Creek  below 
the  confluence  of  Salt  Creek. 

Under  this  alternative  timber  harvest  activities  would  impact  4.5  percent  of  the  Salt  Creek  drainage 
and  1 1 .3  percent  of  the  'Perm'  Creek  drainage.  This  represents  the  lowest  level  of  harvest  within  the 
Salt  Creek  drainage  of  the  six  alternatives  considered.  No  impacts  to  the  natural  flow  regimes  of  either 
Salt  Creek  or  Woodtick  Creek  would  be  expected  at  these  disturbance  levels. 


G2  - 10 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  G2 


Direct  and  Indirect  Effects  Specific  to  Alternative  4 

The  transportation  system  associated  with  this  alternative  utilizes  the  proposed  extension  of  F.S. 
Road  1 06,  as  in  Alternative  2,  reconstruction  of  the  existing  F.S.  Road  1 07,  and  further  extension  of 
F.S.  Road  107  one  additional  mile  into  the  Woodtick  Creek  and  Pete’s  Gulch  drainages  (Figure  2-4). 
Stream  crossing  locations  would  be  identical  to  those  described  for  Alternative  2.  Because  the 
additional  roading  required  under  this  alternative  is  located  entirely  on  upper-slope  portions  of  the 
Woodtick  Creek  and  Pete’s  Gulch  basins,  no  additional  road-related  impacts  to  aquatic  resources 
would  be  anticipated  from  those  described  under  Alternative  2. 

BOISED  modeling  of  the  effects  of  the  transportation  system  and  harvest  prescriptions  associated 
with  this  alternative  indicates  that  sediment  delivery  rates  to  Moyer  Creek  and  Woodtick  Creek  would 
be  the  second  highest  of  the  seven  alternatives  analyzed.  Mitigation  measures  identified  in  Chapter 
2,  and  applicable  soil  and  water  Best  Management  Practices  (BMPs)  are,  however,  expected  to  be 
fully  successful  in  protecting  the  aquatic  habitats  of  the  Woodtick  Creek  and  Moyer  Creek  drainages. 
Results  and  interpretation  of  BOISED  sediment  modeling  are  discussed  in  greater  detail  within  the 
Hydrology  Effects  section  of  the  FEIS. 

Timber  harvest  prescriptions  are  maximized  under  this  alternative.  Potential  effects  to  fisheries  are 
primarily  related  to  possible  increases  in  peak  flow  intensities  resulting  from  intensive  harvest  of  the 
Salt  Creek  and  'Perm'  Creek  drainages.  Proposed  harvest  operations  under  this  alternative  would 
encompass  14.3  percent  of  the  Salt  Creek  drainage  and  14.2  percent  of  the  'Perm'  Creek  drainage. 
While  the  most  intensive  of  the  various  harvest  proposals,  basin  disturbance  under  this  alternative 
would  not  approach  threshold  levels  observed  to  result  in  significant  increases  in  annual  water  yield 
and  peak  flow  intensity  (Troendle  and  Leaf,  1980,  as  cited  by  Troendle,  1982).  As  unmitigated 
potential  sediment  impacts  to  Salt  Creek,  'Perm'  Creek,  and  Moyer  Creek  from  increased  peak  flow 
intensity  are  not  anticipated,  implementation  of  this  alternative  would  not  be  expected  to  adversely 
affect  fisheries  resources  within  the  Moyer  or  Woodtick  Creek  drainage  systems. 

Direct  and  Indirect  Effects  Specific  to  Alternative  5 

This  alternative  requires  the  least  new  roadbuilding  of  the  six  action  alternatives.  Woodtick  Creek 
would  be  the  only  stream  crossed  by  the  associated  transportation  system.  Fish  passage  at  the 
existing  culvert  at  Township  20  N,  Range  19  E,  Section  32  (Figure  2-5)  would  be  restored  in 
association  with  the  required  reconstruction  of  FS  Road  1 07  associated  with  this  alternative. 

BOISED  sediment  modeling  results  for  this  combination  of  roads  and  cutting  units  indicate  that  this 
alternative  would  yield  the  second  lowest  amount  of  sediment  to  the  Moyer  Creek  and  Woodtick 
Creek  drainages  of  the  seven  alternatives  analyzed,  and  the  lowest  amount  of  sediment  of  the  six 
action  alternatives.  Mitigation  measures  identified  in  Chapter  2,  and  applicable  soil  and  water  Best 
Management  Practices  (BMPs)  are  expected  to  be  fully  successful  in  protecting  the  aquatic  habitats 
of  these  two  drainages.  Results  and  analysis  of  BOISED  sediment  modeling  are  discussed  in  greater 
detail  within  the  Hydrology  section  of  the  FEIS. 

Under  this  alternative  timber  harvest  activities  would  impact  5.1  percent  of  the  Salt  Creek  drainage 
and  4.3  percent  of  the  'Perm'  Creek  drainage.  This  represents  the  lowest  level  of  harvest  within  the 
'Perm'  Creek  drainage  and  the  second  lowest  level  of  harvest  within  the  Sait  Creek  drainage  of  the 
six  alternatives.  No  impacts  to  the  natural  flow  regimes  of  these  streams  would  be  expected  at  these 
disturbance  levels  (Troendle  and  Leaf,  1980,  as  cited  by  Troendle,  1982). 

Direct  and  Indirect  Effects  Specific  to  Alternative  6 

The  transportation  system  of  this  alternative  is  identical  to  that  of  Alternative  4.  As  sediment  generated 
by  road  construction  activities  comprises  the  major  component  of  overall  yield,  land  disturbance 


G2  - 11 


Moyer  Salt  Umber  Safe  Final  EIS 


Appendix  G2 


reductions  associated  with  the  application  of  diversified  forestry  harvest  strategies  within  units 
otherwise  scheduled  for  dearcutting  under  Alternative  4 represents  a relatively  minor  factor  in  the 
overall  level  of  sediment  generation  under  this  alternative.  The  predicted  BOISED  sediment  yield  for 
this  alternative,  as  a result,  would  be  essentially  the  same  as  that  generated  under  Alternative  4 (Table 
SI-2).  As  with  Alternative  2,  mitigation  measures  identified  in  Chapter  2,  and  applicable  soil  and  water 
Best  Management  Practices  (BMPs),  are  therefore  expected  to  be  fully  successful  in  protecting  the 
aquatic  habitats  of  the  Woodtick  Creek  and  Moyer  Creek  drainages.  Results  and  interpretation  of 
BOISED  sediment  modeling  are  discussed  in  greater  detail  within  the  Hydrology  Effects  section  of 
the  FEIS. 

Proposed  harvest  operations  under  this  alternative  would  encompass  1 2.3  percent  of  the  Salt  Creek 
drainage  and  13.1  percent  of  the  “Perm"  Creek  drainage.  Due  to  the  reduction  of  hanrest  within  15 
units  otherwise  slated  for  clearcutting,  this  alternative  represents  a 14.0  percent  reduction  in  Salt 
Creek  basin  harvest,  and  a 7.8  percent  reduction  in  "Perm”  Creek  basin  harvest,  relative  to  alternative 
4.  As  with  alternative  4,  these  levels  of  basin  harvest,  though  among  the  highest  of  the  alternatives 
considered,  do  not  approach  the  threshold  levels  observed  to  result  in  significant  changes  in  annual 
water  yield  or  peak  flow  intensity  (Troendle  and  Leaf,  1980,  as  cited  by  Troendle,  1982). 

Direct  and  Indirect  Effects  Specific  to  Alternative  2a 

The  transportation  system  of  this  alternative  is  identical  to  that  of  Alternative  2.  As  with  that  alternative, 
fish  passage  at  the  existing  road  culvert  on  FS  Road  107  (Township  20  N,  Range  19  E,  Section  32) 
would  be  restored  through  Knudson-Vandenberg  (KV)  funding,  rather  than  in  direct  association  with 
road  reconstruction  operations. 

As  indicated  in  the  discussion  for  Alternative  6,  sediment  generated  by  road  construction  activities 
comprises  the  major  component  of  overall  sediment  yield  from  timber  sale  activities.  Land  disturb- 
ance reductions  associated  with  the  application  of  diversified  forestry  harvest  strategies  within  units 
otherwise  scheduled  for  clearcutting  under  Alternative  4 therefore  represents  a relatively  minor  factor 
in  the  overall  level  of  sediment  generation  under  this  alternative.  The  predicted  BOISED  sediment 
yield  for  this  alternative,  as  a result,  is  essentially  the  same  as  that  generated  under  Alternative  2 
(T able  11-2).  As  with  Alternative  2,  mitigation  measures  identified  in  Chapter  2,  and  applicable  soil  and 
water  Best  Management  Practices  (BMPs),  are  therefore  expected  to  be  fully  successful  in  protecting 
the  aquatic  habitats  of  the  Woodtick  Creek  and  Moyer  Creek  drainages.  Results  and  interpretation 
of  BOISED  sediment  modeling  are  discussed  in  greater  detail  within  the  Hydrology  Effects  section 
of  the  FEIS. 

Proposed  harvest  operations  under  this  alternative  would  encompass  8.2  percent  of  the  Satt  Creek 
drainage  and  1 0.4  percent  of  the  "Perm”  Creek  drainage.  Due  to  the  reduction  of  haivest  within  21 
units  otherwise  slated  for  clearcutting,  this  alternative  represents  a 9.9  percent  reduction  in  Salt  Creek 
basin  harvest,  and  a 8.0  percent  reduction  in  "Perm"  Creek  basin  harvest,  relative  to  alternative  2.  As 
with  alternative  2,  these  levels  of  basin  harvest  are  well  below  the  threshold  levels  observed  to  result 
in  significant  changes  in  annual  water  yield  or  peak  flow  intensity  (Troendle  and  Leaf,  1980,  as  cited 
by  Troendle,  1982). 

Cumulative  Effects 

Harvest  operations  within  the  Woodtick  Creek  drainage  associated  with  the  1 988  Tick  Creek  Timber 
Sale  have  impacted  23  percent  of  the  Little  Woodtick  Creek  drainage.  Post-sale  field  review  of  the  area 
by  the  Forest  Hydrologist  in  1 991  indicated  that  an  increase  in  water  yield  directly  attributable  to 
intensive  timber  harvest  had  produced  deleterious  sedimentation  in  Little  Woodtick  Creek  below  the 
sale  area  (see  FEIS,  Affected  Environment,  Hydrology).  Sedimentation  effects  appeared  to  be  con- 
fined to  Little  Woodtick  Creek  and  were  not  believed  to  have  impacted  fish-bearing  waters  of 
mainstem  Woodtick  Creek.  The  increased  water  yield  observed  in  Little  Woodtick  Creek  as  a result 


G2  - 12 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  G2 


of  intensive  harvest  within  that  drainage  is  not  thought  to  have  produced  any  measurabie  effects  on 
the  intensity  or  timing  of  peak  flows  in  mainstem  Woodtick  Creek,  due  to  dissimilarities  in  the  timing 
of  runoff  in  the  two  streams. 

This  23  percent  disturbance  of  the  Little  Woodtick  Creek  drainage  corresponds  to  5.2  percent  of  the 
total  Woodtick  Creek  drainage.  The  various  timber  harvest  prescriptions  proposed  under  the  Moyer 
Salt  timber  sale  would  impact  an  additional  1 .8  to  3.0  percent  of  the  total  Woodtick  Creek  drainage, 
bringing  cumulative  land  disturbance  within  the  drainage  to  7.0  to  8.2  percent.  As  this  level  of 
disturbance  would  be  substantially  below  the  20  to  30  percent  regarded  as  capable  of  producing 
significantly  increased  water  yield  (Troendle  and  Leaf,  1980,  as  cited  by  Troendle,  1982),  no  further 
fisheries  impacts  related  to  cumulative  land  disturbance  in  the  Woodtick  Creek  drainage  would  be 
anticipated  under  any  of  the  proposed  Moyer  Salt  action  alternatives. 

Reasonably  foreseeable  future  activities  within  the  analysis  area  include  timber  stand  improvement 
(TSI)  operations  within  all  shelterwood  units,  post  and  pole  sales,  and  public  firewood  salvage.  No 
additional  road  construction  would  be  needed  to  implement  these  post-sale  activities,  and  no  new 
commercial  sawtimber  sales  are  proposed  within  the  analysis  area  within  the  current  planning  period. 
Consequently,  cumulative  impacts  to  aquatic  habitats  encompassing  post-sale  activities  would  be 
limited  to  those  described  in  the  preceding  sections.  Only  a very  minor  and  short-lived  increase  in 
consumptive  harvest  of  resident  fish  would  be  expected  in  association  with  any  open-access  public 
firewood  gathering  in  the  Woodtick  Creek  area. 

Consistency  with  Forest  Plan  Standards  and  Guidelines 

All  action  alternatives  except  Alternative  3 are  expected  to  provide  a level  of  fish  habitat  protection 
consistent  with  Forest  Plan  guidelines.  Alternative  3 exhibits  an  high  inherent  risk  of  failure  to  meet 
water  quality  standards,  due  to  the  site  specific  inability  to  adequately  protect  water  quality  and 
stream  substrates  in  the  vicinity  of  the  proposed  Salt  Creek  crossing  site.  Additionally,  Alternative  1 , 
the  No  Action  alternative,  is  not  consistent  with  Forest  Plan  guidelines  because  the  current  fish 
passage  problem  on  Woodtick  Creek  would  most  likely  continue.  No  funding  mechanisms  to  repair 
or  replace  this  culvert  would  be  implemented  under  this  alternative.  This  barrier  could  be  corrected 
at  some  time  under  another  program  such  as  the  Salmon  National  Forest  Fisheries  Program,  but 
priority  for  scheduling  of  such  a repair  via  this  funding  mechanism  would  fall  below  restoration  of 
migration  opportunities  in  streams  supporting  Federally  threatened  Snake  River  spring/summer 
Chinook  salmon. 


Determinations 

Steelhead 

Based  upon  analysis  of  the  effects  of  the  proposed  alternatives,  and  contingent  upon  implementation 
of  Salmon  National  Forest  soil  and  water  Best  Management  Practices  (BMPs)  and  site  specific  soil, 
water  and  fisheries  mitigations  as  identified  within  the  FEIS,  it  is  my  determination  that  Alternative  1 
of  the  proposed  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  will  have  "No  Effect*  upon  current  steelhead  population  or 
habitat  status  within  the  Woodtick  Creek  and  Moyer  Creek  drainages.  St  is  my  further  determination 
that  Alternatives  2, 4, 5, 6,  and  2a  of  this  propose  timber  sale  "May  Affect  Individuals,  but  are  Not  Likely 
to  Result  in  a Trend  Toward  Federal  Listing"  of  steelhead.  Finally,  due  to  probable  and  unavoidable 
sedimentation  impacts  to  the  stream  substrates  of  Salt  Creek  and  Moyer  Creek  receiving  waters,  it 
is  my  determination  that  Alternative  3 of  the  proposed  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  “Is  Likely  to  Result  in 
a Trend  Toward  Federal  Listing"  of  steelhead  trout. 


62  - 13 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Salle  Final  EIS 


Appendix  G2 


Westslope  Cutthroat  Trout 

Based  upon  analysis  of  the  effects  of  the  proposed  alternatives,  and  contingent  upon  implementation 
of  Salmon  National  Forest  soil  and  water  Best  Management  Practices  (BMPs)  and  site  specific  soil, 
water  and  fisheries  mitigations  as  identified  within  the  FEIS,  it  is  my  determination  that  each  of  the 
seven  proposed  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  alternatives  would  have  "No  Effect"  upon  current  westslope 
cutthroat  trout  habitat  status  within  the  Woodtick  Creek  and  Moyer  Creek  drainages. 

Bull  Trout 

Based  upon  analysis  of  the  effects  of  the  proposed  alternatives,  and  contingent  upon  implementation 
of  Salmon  National  Forest  soil  and  water  Best  Management  Practices  (BMPs)  and  site  specific  soil, 
water  and  fisheries  mitigations  as  identified  within  the  FEIS,  it  is  my  determination  that  Alternative  1 
of  the  proposed  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  will  have  "No  Effect"  upon  current  bull  trout  population  or 
habitat  status  within  the  Woodtick  Creek  and  Moyer  Creek  drainages.  St  is  my  further  determination 
that  Alternatives  2, 4, 5, 6,  and  2a  of  this  propose  timber  sale  "May  Affect  Individuals,  but  are  Not  Likely 
to  Result  in  a Trend  Toward  Federal  Listing"  of  bull  trout.  Finally,  due  to  probable  and  unavoidable 
sedimentation  impacts  to  the  stream  substrates  of  Salt  Creek  and  Moyer  Creek  receiving  waters,  it 
is  my  determination  that  Alternative  3 of  the  proposed  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  "Is  Likely  to  Result  in 
a Trend  Toward  Federal  Listing"  of  bull  trout. 


Management  Recommendations 

As  all  soil,  water,  and  fisheries  Best  Management  Practices  (BMPs)  and  mitigations  considered 
necessary  to  avert  adverse  impacts  to  fisheries  resources  under  action  alternatives  2,  4,  5,  6,  and  2a 
were  incorporated  within  the  original  timber  sale  proposal,  no  additional  measures  are  recommended 
for  these  alternatives.  Expected  adverse  impacts  to  the  Salt  Creek  stream  channel  under  Alternative 
3 are  related  primarily  to  a site  specific  inability  to  adequately  protect  the  stream  from  road  slope 
erosion  at  the  proposed  crossing  location.  This  alternative  additionally  suffers  from  a logistical 
inability  to  relocate  this  route  to  a location  which  would  avoid  the  steep,  stream  parallelling  approach- 
es which  create  such  a high  risk  erosion  hazard  (see  attached  memo  of  February  5, 1993).  Potential 
engineering,  soil  and  water  measures  not  currently  included  within  the  mitigation  package  for  this 
alternative  include  full  bench  road  construction  in  the  vicinity  of  the  Salt  Creek  crossing,  and  silt  fence 
installations  below  road  fill  slopes.  Application  of  additional  vegetation-based  erosion  attenuation 
measures  are  largely  precluded  at  this  proposed  crossing,  however,  due  to  the  harsh  environmental 
growing  conditions  on  the  dry,  south-facing  slopes. 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  G2 


Literature  Cited 


Allen,  K.  R.  1 969.  "Limitations  on  Production  in  Salmonid  Populations  in  Streams',  In  Symposium  on 
Salmon  and  Trout  in  Streams,  T.  G.  Northcote,  ed.,  pp.  3-18.  H.  R.  MacMillan  Lectures  in  Fisheries. 
Univ.  of  British  Columbia:  Vancouver. 

Bjornn,  T.  C.  1969.  Embryo  Survival  and  Emergence  Studies.  Job.  No.  5,  Federal  Aid  in  Fish  and 
Wildlife  Restoration.  Job  Completion  Report.,  Proj.  F-49-R-7.  Idaho  Fish  and  Game  Dept.:  Boise,  ID. 

11  pp. 

Burum,  D.,  M.  Sprague,  and  B.  Lewis.  1990.  U.S.  Forest  Service  Region  4,  Salmon  National  Forest, 
GAWS  Level  I Stream  Habitat  Inventory.  Salmon  National  Forest  Fisheries  Files. 

Carter,  D.  1990.  Unpublished  baseline  aquatic  survey  data  for  the  Salmon  National  Forest.  Salmon 
National  Forest  Fisheries  Files. 

Chapman,  D.  W.  1962.  "Effects  of  Logging  upon  Fish  Resources  of  the  West  Coast."  J.  of  Forestry. 
60(8):  533-537. 

Chapman,  D.  W.  1966.  "Food  and  Space  as  Regulators  of  Salmonid  Populations  in  Streams."  Ameri- 
can Naturalist.  1 00:  345-357. 

Evans,  W.  A.  and  F.  B.  Johnson.  1 980.  Fish  Migration  and  Fish  Passage:  A Practical  Guide  to  Solving 
Fish  Passage  Problems.  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture  Forest  Service  EM-7100-2,  Washington,  D. 
C. 

Greene,  G.  E.  1950.  "Land  Use  and  Trout  Streams."  J.  Soil  and  Water  Conserv.  5:  125-126. 

Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game.  1 965.  Inventory  of  Idaho  Streams  Containing  Anadromous  Fish, 
Including  Recommendations  for  Improving  Production  of  Salmon  and  Steelhead.  U.S.  Fish  and 
Wildlife  Service,  Bureau  of  Commercial  Fisheries,  Contract  Number  14-19-001-431.  June  15,  1965. 

Kimble,  L.  A.,  and  T.  A.  Wesche.  1975.  "Relationship  Between  Selected  Physical  Parameters  and 
Benthic  Community  Structure  in  a Small  Mountain  Stream."  Water  Resource  Research  Institute  Series, 
No.  55.  Univ.  of  Wyoming:  Laramie.  64  pp. 

Koski,  K.  V.  1 966.  The  Survival  of  Coho  Salmon  ( Oncoryhnchus  kisutch)  from  Egg  Deposition  to 
Emergence  in  Three  Oregon  Coastal  Streams."  Oreg.  State  Univ.:  Corvallis.  84  pp.  (Master’s  Thesis) 

LaFontaine,  G.  1981.  Caddisflies.  Lyons  and  Burford:  New  York.  336  pp. 

Leopold,  L.,  M.  G.  Wolman  and  J.  P.  Miller.  1964.  Fluvial  Processes  in  Geomorphology.  W.  H.  Freeman 
Co.:  San  Francisco,  CA.  522  pp. 

McNiel,  W.  J.,  andW.  H.  Ahnell.  1964.  Success  of  Pink  Salmon  Spawning  Relative  to  Size  of  Spawning 
Bed  Materials.  U.S.  Fish  and  Wildl.  Serv.  Spec.  Sci.  Rep.  Fish.  No.  469.  15  pp. 

Meehan,  W.  R.,  F.  J.  Swanson  and  J.  R.  Sedell.  1977.  "Influence  of  Riparian  Vegetation  on  Aquatic 
Ecosystems  with  Particular  Reference  to  Salmonid  Fishes  and  their  Food  Supply."  In  Importance, 
Preservation,  and  Management  of  Riparian  Habitat:  Proceedings  of  a Symposium;  1977,  July  9, 
Tucson,  AZ.  tech,  coords.  Johnson,  R.R.  and  D.A.  Jones,  pp.  137-145.  Gen.  Tech.  Rep.  RM-43.  U.S. 


G2  - 15 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  G2 


Department  of  Agriculture,  Forest  Service,  Rocky  Mountain  Forest  and  Range  Experiment  Station: 
Fort  Coilins,  CO.  1977. 

Northwest  Power  Planning  Council.  1 991 . Salmon  River  Sub-Basin  Salmon  and  Steelhead  Production 
Plan. 

Northwest  Power  Planning  Council.  1 991 . Chinook  Salmon  and  Steelhead  presence/absence  files  for 
the  Salmon  River  Subbasin. 

Phillips,  R.  W.  1970.  “Effects  of  Sediment  on  the  Gravel  Environment  and  Fish  Production.'  In 
Proceedings  of  Forest  Land  Uses  and  Stream  Environments,  pp.  64-75.  Oregon  State  University: 
Corvallis,  Oregon. 

Reiser,  D.  W.  1 986.  Panther  Creek,  Idaho,  Habitat  Rehabilitation  - Final  Report.  BPA  Project  No.  84-29. 
Prepared  for:  U.S.  Department  of  Energy,  Bonneville  Power  Administration.  Portland,  OR.  January, 
1986. 

Rieffenberger,  E.  1 992.  Personal  Communication.  Discussions  with  Robert  Rose  concerning  effects 
of  the  Tick  Creek  Timber  Sale  upon  peak  streamflow  magnitude  and  timing  in  Little  Woodtick  and 
Woodtick  Creeks. 

Rosgen,  D.  L.  1978.  “Prediction  Techniques  for  Potential  Changes  in  Sediment  Discharge  Due  to 
Silvicultural  Activities.'  ASCE  Annual  Meeting.  Pittsburg,  PA.  1978.  12  pp. 

Simpson,  J.  G.,  and  R.  L.  Wallace.  1982.  Fishes  of  Idaho.  University  of  Idaho  Press.  Moscow,  Idaho. 

Smith,  B.  1 991 . Personal  Communication.  Discussions  with  Robert  Rose  concerning  the  effect  of  the 
warming  influence  of  Woodtick  Creek  on  winter  anchor  ice  formation  in  Panther  Creek. 

Smith,  B.  1 993.  Personal  Communication.  Discussions  with  Robert  Rose  concerning  prioritization  of 
migration  barrier  repairs  on  the  Salmon  National  Forest. 

Sprules,  W.  M.  1947.  An  Ecologies I Investigation  of  Stream  Insects  in  Algonquin  Park,  Ontario.  Univ. 
Toronto  Studies.  Biol.  56.  Publ.  Ont.  Fish.  Res.  Lab.  69:  1-81. 

Tambe,  C.  1989.  Personal  Communication.  Discussions  with  Robert  Rose  concerning  the  presence 
of  cutthroat  trout  in  the  upper  reaches  of  Panther  Creek  above  the  USFS  Moyer  housing  site. 

Troendle,  C.  A.  1 982.  The  Effects  of  Small  Clearcuts  on  Water  Yields  from  the  Deadhorse  Watershed; 
Frasier,  Colorado.0  In  Proceedings  of  the  50th  Annual  Meeting  of  the  Western  Snow  Conference, 
(Reno,  Nevada;  April  19-23,  1982),  pp.  75-83.  Colorado  State  University:  Fort  Collins,  Colorado.  225 
pp. 

Troendle,  C.A.,  and  R.M.  King.  1985.  The  Effect  of  Timber  Harvest  on  the  Fool  Creek  Watershed,  30 
Years  Later.0  Water  Resources  Research  21,  p.  1915-1922. 

USDA  Forest  Service.  1 988.  Forest  Land  and  Resource  Management  Plan  for  the  Salmon  National 
Forest. 

Wicket,  W.  P.  1958.  "Review  of  Certain  Environmental  Factors  Affecting  the  Production  of  Pink  and 
Chum  Salmon.' J.  Fish.  Res.  Bd.  Can.  15(5):  1103-1126. 

Yee,  C.  S.,  and  T.  D.  Roelofs.  1 980.  "Planning  Forest  Roads  to  Protect  Salmonid  Habitat."  In  Influence 
of  Forest  and  Range-land  Management  on  Anadromous  Fish  Habitat  in  Western  North  America,  ed., 


G2  - 16 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  G2 


W.  Meehan.  Pacific  Northwest  Forest  and  Range  Experiment  Station.  USDA  Forest  Service:  Portland, 
Oregon. 

Contributors 

This  Biological  Assessment  was  prepared  by  Robert  W.  Rose,  Fishery  Biologist,  Salmon  National 
Forest.  Additional  information  was  provided  by  the  following  persons: 


Tom  Bonn 

Supervisory  Civil  Engineering  Technician 

Supervisor’s  Office 
Salmon  National  Forest 

Deb  Carter 

Fishery  Biologist 
Supervisor’s  Office 
Salmon  National  Forest 

Gene  Jensen 

Branch  Chief 

Land  Management  Planning 
Salmon  National  Forest 

Betsy  Rieffenberger 

Forest  Hydrologist 
Supervisor’s  Office 
Salmon  National  Forest 

Bruce  Smith 

Forest  Fishery  Biologist 
Supervisor’s  Office 
Salmon  National  Forest 

Appendices 


Appendix  A: 

Maps 

Salmon  National  Forest  Visitor  Map  and 

7.5  minute  series  USGS  topographic  quad  maps. 

G2-  17 


Moyer  Saft  Timber  Sal®  Final  ESS 


Appendix  G2 


Appendix  C: 


Summary  of  Soil  and  Water  Best  Management 
Practices 


Appendix  C: 


Photographs 


G2  - 18 


APPENDIX  H 


BIOLOGICAL  DIVERSITY 


Outline  and  Page  Numbers:  Appendix  H 


Appendix  H.  Landscape  Ecology/BiologicaS  Diversity  Outline  Page 

Introduction  H-1 

Section  1:  Existing  Condition  H-1 

I.  Landscape  Level H-1 

A.  Definitions H-1 

B.  Analysis  Landscape  H-2 

Landscape  boundaries H-2 

C.  Surrounding  Landscapes  H-3 

1 .  Adjacent  landscapes:  conifer  forest  matrix H-3 

a.  Description H-3 

b.  Flow H-3 

i.  Wind,  water,  nutrients,  energy H-3 

ii.  Plants H-4 

iii.  Animals:  birds,  mammals,  invertebrates,  reptiles,  fish H-4 

iv.  T&E,  Proposed  and  Sensitive  Species H-4 

c.  Corridors H-5 

i.  Animals:  birds,  mammals,  invertebrates,  reptiles,  fish H-5 

ii.  T&E,  Proposed  and  Sensitive  Species H-5 

iii.  Plants H-6 

II.  Landscape  Ecosystems  Structure:  Patches,  Corridors,  and  Matrixes H-7 

A.  Patch  Ecosystems H-7 

1 . Heterogeneity  between  patches H-7 

2.  Boundary  shape H-7 

3.  Edge  and  edge  effect H-7 

4.  Homogeneity  between  patches H-8 

5.  Patch  disturbance/recovery  regimes H-8 

Table  H-1:  Forest  Class  Totals H-10 

Table  H-2:  Forest  Class  Category  Descriptions H-1 1 

B.  Corridor  ecosystems H-1 1 

1 . Strip  corridors  (riparian  buffer  strips) H-1 1 

2.  Line  corridors  (roads)  H-1 2 

3.  Stream  corridors H-1 2 

a.  Nodes H-1 2 

b.  Heterogeneity H-1 2 

c.  Disturbance/recovery  regimes H-1 3 

d.  Aquatic  habitats  for  TE&S  fish  species  H-1 3 

C.  Matrix  ecosystem H-1 3 


Biological  Diversity  Outline  Appendix  H-1 


Appendix  HL  Landscape  Eco8ogy/Bio8©gical  Diversity  Outline  Page 

ill.  Patch  and  Corridor  Function  within  the  Landscape H-14 

A.  Ecosystem  connectiveness  H-14 

B.  Porosity  of  ecosystems H-14 

Porosity  and  genetic  variability H-14 

Edge  effect  and  porosity  H-14 

C.  T&E,  P,  and  S Species  and  porosity/connectivity H-15 

Table  H-3:  TEPS  Select/Avoidance  Communities H-17 

D.  Flow H-17 

Plants  and  animals  H-17 

Airborne  flows  . . . . H-18 

Overland  flows H-19 

2.  Energy.  H-19 

Vector  of  energy  flow  H-20 

Wind  H-20 

Water H-20 

E.  Resistance  to  flow H-20 

Boundary  crossing  frequency H-20 

Table  H-4:  Boundary  Crossing  Frequency H-21 

Section  2:  Effects  analysis  of  proposed  alternatives H“23 

I.  Landscape  H-23 

A.  Surrounding  landscapes H-23 

1 . Adjacent  landscapes: 

Conifer  forest  matrix H-23 

a.  Heterogeneity  and  homogeneity  to  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape H-23 

b.  Movement  among  the  landscapes H-23 

i.  Flow 

(a)  Wind,  water,  nutrients,  energy H-23 

(b)  Plants  in  general H-24 

(c)  Animals:  birds,  mammals,  reptiles,  fish,  invertebrates H-24 

(d)  T&E,  P and  S species H-24 

ii.  Corridor  flow  of  adjacent  landscapes 

(a)  Wind,  water  and  energy H-25 

(b)  Plants  in  general H-26 

(c)  Animals:  birds,  mammals,  reptiles,  fish,  invertebrates H-26 

(d)  T&E,  Proposed  and  Sensitive  species H-26 


Biological  Diversity  Outline  Appendix  H - 2 


Appendix  H.  Landscape  Ecology/Biological  Diversity  Outline  Page 

II.  Landscape  Ecosystems  Structure:  patches,  corridors,  and  matrix H-27 

A.  Patch  ecosystems H-27 

1 .  Patches  in  the  analysis  landscape H-26 

a.  Table  H-5:  Acres  cut  in  each  timber  class  by  alternative H-27 

Table  H-6:  Percentage  total  proposed  harvest  in 

each  timber  class  by  alternative  H-28 

b.  Heterogeneity  and  homogeneity  within  and  between  patches H-28 

i.  Between  patches H-28 

Table  H-7:  Acres  in  each  harvest  method H-29 

Table  H-8:  Forest  class  size  Averages H-29 

ii.  Within  Patches H-30 

Table  H-9:  Acre  harvest  from  each  forest  type H-31 

c.  Boundary  shape H-34 

d.  Edge  and  edge  effect H-34 

e.  Disturbance/recovery  regimes H-35 

B.  Corridors  ecosystems H-35 

1 . Stream  corridors  H-35 

a.  Character  of  riparian  corridors H-35 

b.  Disturbance/recovery  regimes  of  strip  stream  corridors H-35 

2.  Line  corridors  (roads)  H-36 

Table  H-10:  Miles  of  road  constructed  or  reconstructed H-36 

a.  Homogeneity  of  line  corridors H-36 

b.  Disturbance/recovery  regimes  of  line  corridors H-36 

C.  Matrix  ecosystem * H-36 

III.  Patch  and  corridor  function  within  the  landscape H-36 

A.  Patch  ecosystem  function H-36 

1 . Connectiveness  of  patches  H-36 

T&E,  P,  and  S as  related  to  patch  connectivity H-36 

2.  Porosity  of  ecosystems H-36 

Porosity  related  to  genetic  variability H-36 

Table  H-11:  Porosity  as  measured  by  patch  numbers  H-37 

3.  Flow H-38 

Table  H-12:  Boundary  Crossing  Frequency H-39 

a.  Boundary  function H-40 

i.  Edge H-40 

ii.  Source  and  sink H-41 

b.  Energy H-42 

C.  Corridor  ecosystem  function H-42 

1 . Riparian  corridors H-42 

a.  Boundary  Function H-42 

i.  Airborne  flows H-42 

(a)  Energy,  nutrients,  materials H-42 

(b)  T&E,  P,  and  S H-42 

ii.  Overland  flows H-43 

(a)  Energy,  nutrients,  materials H-43 

(b)  T&E,  P,  and  S H-43 

iii.  Soil  flows H-43 

iv.  Aquatic H-44 

b.  Source  and  sink H-44 

2.  Non-riparian  corridors H-44 

a.  Strip  corridors  H-44 


Biological  Diversity  Outline  Appendix  H - 3 


i.  Barrier/filter H-44 

(a)  T&E,  Proposed  and  Sensitive H-44 

b.  Lines  corridors H-44 

i.  Barrier/filter H-45 

(a)  Genera!  animals  and  plants H-45 

(b)  Aquatic H-45 

(c)  T&E,  P,  and  S,  MIS  ...  H-45 


Biological  Diversity  Outline  Appendix  H - 4 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


LANDSCAPE  ECOLOGY:  Ecology  as  It  Pertains  to  Biological  Diversity 

Introduction 

The  Salmon  National  Forest’s  biological  diversity  analysis  is  divided  into  three  levels:  the  regional 
level,  landscape  level,  and  Forest  Level. 

Landscape  ecology  has  a close  relationship  to  biological  diversity  because  of  its  placement  in  the 
landscape  level  of  analysis.  This  large  (-30,000  acres)  landscape  level  appears  to  be  the  most 
promising  size  for  detecting  effects  on  biological  diversity  and  maintaining  a sustainable  environment 
(Forman  1990). 

This  report  addresses  the  landscape  level  of  biological  diversity  in  the  Moyer  Salt  area  through  a 
discussion  of  landscape  ecology.  It  also  serves  as  a reference  for  information  in  Chapters  I through 
IV  of  the  EIS. 


SECTSON  S.  AFFECTED  ENVIRONMENT 


I.  LANDSCAPE  LEVEL 
A.  Definitions 

In  this  document  we  will  define  a landscape  as  a heterogeneous  land  area  composed  of  a cluster 
of  interacting  ecosystems  that  are  repeated  in  similar  form  throughout  the  geographical  landscape 
(Forman  and  Godron  1986).  A landscape  is  a distinct,  measurable  unit  and  is  recognizable  by  the 
similarities  in  its  inherent  patterns  of  interacting  ecosystems,  geomorphology  (landforms),  and  dis- 
turbance regimes  (Forman  and  Godron  1986). 

The  following  terms  will  be  used  throughout  the  discussion.  For  clarity’s  sake  they  will  be  defined 
here: 

Ecosystems  - For  the  purpose  of  this  analysis  we  will  use  the  term  ecosystem  to  refer  to  the  basic 
landscape  unit.  Ecosystems  are  basic,  relatively  homogeneous,  ecological  elements  or  units  of  the 
land  whether  they  are  of  natural  or  human  origin  (Forman  and  Godron  1986).  The  three  main  types 
of  landscape  elements  or  ecosystems  we  will  consider  are  patches,  corridors  and  matrixes. 

Patches  - A patch  is  a nonlinear  habitat  differing  in  appearance  from  its  surroundings.  Patches  vary 
widely  in  size,  shape,  type,  heterogeneity,  and  boundary  characteristics  (Forman  and  Godron  1986). 
One  example  would  be  a wet  meadow  surrounded  by  conifer  forest;  another  would  be  a forest  stand 
composed  of  one  species  and/or  age  class  of  tree  surrounded  by  habitat  that  is  different  in  species 
composition,  age  or  perhaps  density.  Closed  boundary  patches  are  those  whose  entire  borders  lie 
within  the  landscape,  as  opposed  to  open  boundary  patches  whose  borders  extend  beyond  the 
landscape  (Forman  and  Godron  1986). 

Corridors  - In  simplest  terms,  corridors  are  comparatively  narrow  strips  of  land  which  differ  from  the 
habitats  on  either  side  (Forman  and  Godron,  1986).  An  example  would  be  a cottonwood  tree-lined 
riparian  area  in  shrub/steppe  habitat. 


H - 1 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


Matrix  - The  matrix  is  the  largest  and  most  connected  ecosystem  unit,  and  therefore  plays  the 
dominant  role  in  landscape  functions  such  as  flows  of  energy,  materials,  and  species  (Forman  and 
Godron  1 986).  It  is  either  the  major  type  of  ecosystem  with  the  most  acreage  within  a landscape,  or 
it  has  the  greatest  connectivity,  or  it  exerts  the  greatest  degree  of  control  over  landscape  dynamics. 
Examples  of  matrixes  would  be  coniferous  forest,  sagebrush  flats,  or  agricultural  cropland. 

Structure  - Each  individual  ecosystem  or  element  at  the  landscape  scale  is  either  a patch  with 
significant  width,  a narrow  corridor,  or  the  background  matrix,  itself.  These  ecosystem  elements  in 
turn  vary  in  size,  shape,  number,  type,  and  configuration.  Ecological  objects  such  as  animals,  plants, 
biomass,  heat  energy,  water,  and  minerals/nutrients  are  distributed  among  these  ecological  ele- 
ments. Determining  the  spatial  distributions  of  the  ecosystems  is  to  understand  landscape  structure 
(Forman  and  Godron  1986). 

Landscape  ecology  and  its  relationships  to  life  processes  are  not  fully  understood  by  ecologists. 
However,  ecologists  know  that  many  organisms  require  more  than  one  ecosystem  to  complete  their 
life  cycles  and,  therefore,  are  dependent  on  landscape  mosaics  for  survival.  Harris  (1984)  has 
indicated  that  the  landscape  mosaic  approach  is  the  only  one  that  can  ensure:  1)  the  conservation 
of  known  endangered  species,  2)  ecotypic  diversity  and  allelic  polymorphism  (variety  in  the  gene  pool 
of  a species),  3)  a diversity  of  native  vertebrates,  4)  community  interactions  of  native  large  mammals 
and  birds,  unknown  or  unidentified  species  and  processes,  and  5)  known  natural  old-growth  ecosys- 
tem processes. 


B.  Analysis  Landscape 

Landscape  Boundaries  for  this  Analysis 

The  boundaries  of  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  (see  Figure  III-2)  were  delineated  on  the  basis  of  energy, 
nutrients  flow,  species  flow,  climate  and  geomorphology.  This  method  was  suggested  by  Harris 
(1984),  Forman  and  Godron  (1986),  and  Kimmins  (1987). 

The  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  spans  approximately  33,000  acres  and  is  bounded  on  the  west  by  the 
ridge  between  Moyer  Creek  and  Panther  Creek;  on  the  north  by  the  ridge  between  Little  Wood  Tick 
Creek  and  Copper  Creek;  on  the  east  by  the  main  Salmon  River  Mountain  ridge  and  on  the  south 
by  the  ridge  north  of  Opal  Creek. 

The  landscapes  surrounding  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  are  predominately  mixed  conifer  ecosystem 
matrices.  Patches  of  open  forest  and  non-forested  areas  are  present  on  south  and  west-facing 
slopes,  particularly  at  elevations  below  7,500  feet. 

The  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  includes  the  Moyer  Creek  and  Woodtick  Creek  drainages  and  their 
tributaries.  Both  creeks  are  steep  and  U-shaped  at  their  headwaters,  trending  towards  V-shaped 
valley  bottoms,  typical  of  the  Salmon  River  Mountains.  These  creeks  flow  west  from  the  Salmon  River 
Mountain  divide  to  Panther  Creek. 

A major  north/south  divide  separates  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  from  the  Iron  Lake  landscape  to  the 
east.  East  of  the  divide,  water,  nutrients  and  energy  flow  to  the  main  Salmon  River.  West  of  the  divide, 
they  flow  into  Panther  Creek. 

The  matrix  for  the  landscape  consists  of  young  (immature)  Douglas-fir  forest  (7,991  acres)  with  a 
smaller  component  of  mature  Douglas-fir  forest  (4,614  acres).  At  elevations  below  7500  feet  and  on 
north-facing  slopes  at  lower  elevations  they  occur  as  stringers  separating  open  areas.  Three  to  seven 
inches  DBH  mixed  conifer  forest  (5,451  acres)  and  non-forested  areas  (5,517  acres)  also  comprise 
major  portions  of  the  landscape. 


H - 2 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


Mature  mixed  conifer-subalpine  fir,  engelmann  spruce  or  lodgepole  mix  (2,327  acres),  immature 
mixed  conifer  (4,909  acres),  open  forest  (4,402  acres)  are  also  present  in  the  landscape.  Smaller 
components  of  the  landscape  are  mixed  conifer  seedlings  and  saplings  (303  acres),  lodgepole  pine 
immature  forest  (543  acres)  and  lodgepole  pole-sized  (1,151  acres)  and  Douglas-fir  pole-sized  (163 
acres). 

Patches  of  non-forested  or  open  forested  types  vary  in  size  from  4 acres  to  995  acres  with  an  average 
size  of  107  acres.  Typically,  the  south  and  west  aspects  at  lower  elevations  consist  of  non-forested 
areas  which  are  usually  rocky  and  support  grasses,  sedges,  sagebrush,  shrubs  and  scattered  trees. 
Habitat  types  associated  with  these  openings  include  sagebrush/bluebunch  wheatgrass  (ARTR/ 
AGSP),  big  sagebrush/Idaho  fescue  (ARTR/FEID)  and  whitebark  pine/subalpine  fir  (PIAL/ABLA) 
types. 


C.  Surrounding  Landscapes 

1.  Adjacent  Landscapes:  conifer  forest  matrix  landscapes 

a.  Description 

The  mixed  conifer  forest  landscapes  to  the  north,  east,  south  and  west  of  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape 
are  similar  to  each  other  and  to  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape.  All  of  these  landscapes  are  vegetated  with 
Douglas-fir,  lodgepole  pine  and  subalpine  fir,  interspersed  with  rocky  outcroppings  and  meadows. 
Non-forested  areas  of  shrubs,  forbs  and  grasses  are  present  particularly  at  lower  elevations  and 
south  and  west  facing  slopes. 

b.  Flow 

i.  Wind,  water,  nutrients,  energy 

Movement  of  abiotic  materials  among  the  four  surrounding  conifer  forest  matrix  landscapes  and  the 
analysis  landscape  is  dependent  on  the  action  of  air  and  water  currents.  The  water  flow  through  the 
Moyer  Salt  Landscape  is  predominately  westward  toward  Panther  Creek  via  the  Moyer  and  Woodtick 
Creeks.  Abiotic  materials  erode  and  flow  readily  as  suspended  sediments  from  the  Moyer  Salt 
Landscape  to  the  west  via  the  Moyer  Creek  and  Woodtick  Creek.  The  prevailing  winds  are  from  the 
north/northwest,  however,  abiotic  material  which  is  suspended  in  the  atmosphere  may  be  moved  in 
any  direction  by  local  wind  currents. 

The  predominate  wind  and  water  flow  occurs  between  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  and  the  Panther 
Creek  Landscape  to  the  west.  The  Moyer  and  Woodtick  streams  flow  directly  into  Panther  Creek  and 
through  the  Panther  Creek  Landscape.  Nutrients  in  the  form  of  sediment  from  the  Moyer  Salt 
Landscape  are  transported  via  creeks  to  downstream  landscapes  including  the  Fawn  Creek  Land- 
scape to  the  north.  (See  Landscape  Boundary  Map,  in  Chapter  III,  Figure  111-2). 

A limited  flow  of  abiotic  materials  occurs  between  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  and  the  Iron  Lake 
Landscape  to  the  east.  A major  hydrologic  divide  of  the  Salmon  River  Mountains  separates  the 
landscapes.  Wind  currents  may  transport  materials  across  the  ridgeline.  Water  flow  east  of  the  ridge 
in  the  Iron  Lake  Landscape  flows  east  via  the  Forks  of  Iron  Creek  and  Forks  of  Hat  Creek  into  the 
Salmon  River. 

Some  wind  flow  likely  occurs  between  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  and  the  Morgan  Creek  Landscape 
to  the  south  across  the  ridgelines  that  separate  the  landscapes. 


H -3 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


Si.  Plants 

Plants  interchange  between  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  and  the  surrounding  landscapes  by  wind  or 
waterborne  seeds;  by  pollen  via  insects  and  birds  and  by  animals  who  ingest  the  seeds  and  later 
deposit  them  or  transport  them  in  their  fur. 

Naturally  occurring  and  man-made  corridors  may  facilitate  transfer  of  seeds  from  one  landscape  to 
another.  Some  species  follow  ridges,  streams  and/or  roads  in  their  movements. 

Hi.  Animals:  birds,  mammals,  invertebrates,  reptiles,  fish 

Most  of  the  birds  and  animals  which  occur  in  the  surrounding  mixed  conifer  forest  landscapes  and 
the  analysis  landscape  can  likely  move  across  both  landscapes  because  the  surrounding  land- 
scapes are  similar  to  the  analysis  landscapes. 

Non-flying  and  flying  Invertebrate  species  can  move  easily  among  the  landscapes  as  habitat  allows. 
Aquatic  insect  species  can  move  easily  between  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  and  the  Panther  Creek 
landscape  to  the  west  and  north  to  the  Fawn  Creek  landscape.  High  elevation  lakes  and  meadows 
are  found  in  the  eastern  portion  of  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  and  the  adjacent  Iron  Lake  Landscape 
to  the  east.  It  is  likely  that  aquatic  insect  species  can  interchange  between  the  landscapes. 

The  benthic  macroinvertebrate  communities  of  Woodtick  and  Goodluck  Creeks  in  the  Moyer  Salt 
Landscape  are  comprised  primarily  of  stonefly  and  mayfly  species,  indicating  both  cold,  well  oxy- 
genated water  of  good  chemical  quality,  and  clean  substrates  relatively  free  of  sediment  deposition. 

Most  of  the  reptiles  that  occur  in  the  analysis  landscape  probably  move  between  the  Moyer  Salt 
Landscape  and  the  surrounding  landscapes  by  following  natural  corridors  like  riparian  areas  or 
across  land  where  similar  habitats  adjoin  at  the  landscape  boundary. 

Fish  move  back  and  forth  between  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  and  the  landscape  to  the  west  (Panther 
Creek  landscape)  seasonally.  A 60  inch  culvert  in  Woodtick  Creek  currently  creates  a barrier  to  fish 
passage  during  high  water  conditions.  Exchange  of  genetic  information  can  occur  indirectly  between 
the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  and  the  landscapes  to  the  north  and  the  south  because  the  streams  in 
all  three  landscapes  flow  basically  westward  and  meet  in  Panther  Creek.  Genetic  interchange  is  more 
difficult  between  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  and  the  landscape  to  the  east  because  a major  ridgeline 
(hydrologic  boundary)  separates  them.  However,  Panther  Creek  joins  the  Salmon  River  25  miles 
downstream  of  the  landscape  so  genetic  interchange  is  possible.  Panther  Creek  and  the  Salmon 
River  are  free-flowing  so  they  are  not  barriers  to  movement. 

Iv.  T&E,  Proposed  and  Sensitive  Species 

North  American  Lynx-  The  lynx  is  a close  relative  of  the  bobcat  (same  genus)  Lynx  are  well  adapted 
to  travel  in  deep  snow  (Koehler  and  Brittell  1 990).  This  is  vital  to  the  pursuit  of  snowshoe  hares,  their 
primary  prey  species.  Lynx  use  mature  forest  stands  for  denning,  cover  for  kittens,  as  well  as  travel 
corridors. 

Because  lynx  prey  on  snowshoe  hare,  good  snowshoe  hare  habitat  is  an  important  element  of  good 
lynx  habitat.  The  preferred  habitat  for  lynx  is  dense  lodgepole  pine  for  hunting  snowshoe  hares 
coupled  with  higher  elevation  spruce-fir  forests  for  denning  (Clark  et  al.  1989).  Lynx  will  usually  not 
cross  openings  greater  than  300  feet.  Lynx  typically  travel  along  ridges  and  saddles  if  mature 
spruce-fir  forest  cover  is  maintained.  (Koehler  and  Brittell  1990) 

In  the  Northern  Rocky  Mountains,  the  wolverine  prefers  mature  or  intermediate  subalpine  fir  habitat 
particularly  south  and  easterly  slopes  and  edge  and  ecotonal  areas  around  cliffs,  slides,  blowdowns, 


H -4 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


basins,  swamps  and  meadows.  They  are  described  as  scavenging  predators,  feeding  on  carrion, 
fruits,  marmots  and  rodents.  Wolverines  occur  where  there  are  large  and  diverse  ungulate  popula- 
tions. 

The  spotted  frog  is  a highly  aquatic  species  found  in  the  vicinity  of  cold,  permanent  water  streams, 
rivers,  springs  and  small  lakes  of  both  wood  and  meadows  (Stebbins  1966).  The  dispersing  behavior 
of  the  spotted  frog  is  not  known.  Movement  among  adjacent  landscapes  likely  occurs  along  streams 
or  wetlands  since  spotted  frogs’  skin  needs  moisture. 

Boreal  Owls,  northern  three-toed  woodpeckers,  and  great  gray  owls  move  readily  in  the  spruce-fir 
life  zone,  their  preferred  habitats.  In  addition,  great  gray  owls  also  move  to  open  forests  and  natural 
or  man-made  openings  to  forage.  The  mobility  of  these  birds  allows  them  to  move  among  the 
landscapes  surrounding  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape. 

Western  Big-eared  Bats  forage  over  sagebrush-grasslands,  riparian  areas,  open  pine  forest,  and 
arid  scrub.  Little  is  know  about  the  suitability  of  or  selection  for  forested  habitats.  They  use  rocky 
outcrops,  caves,  and  old  mines  for  roosting  habitat.  It  is  not  known  whether  these  bats  inhabit  the 
landscape.  However,  because  of  their  ability  to  fly  they  could  disperse  among  landscapes  surround- 
ing the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape. 

Northern  Goshawks  require  dense  mature  to  old  growth  conifer,  mixed  conifer/aspen  or  aspen 
stands  for  nesting  in  the  Rocky  Mountain  region  (Shuster  1980).  Goshawks  hunt  a variety  of  small 
mammals  and  bird  in  dense  forested  areas,  semi-forested  areas,  natural  openings  and  over  water. 
Northern  goshawks  have  been  observed  in  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape. 

The  Rocky  Mountain  gray  wolf,  an  endangered  species,  potentially  occurs  in  the  Moyer  Salt  Land- 
scape and  adjacent  landscapes.  (See  Appendix  F:  Biological  Assessments).  Wolves  have  large 
home  ranges  (Northern  Rocky  Mountain  Wolf  Recovery  Plan  1987)  and  juvenile  wolves  are  known 
to  disperse  great  distances.  Wolves  could  move  easily  among  all  the  contiguous  landscapes. 

c.  Corridors 

I.  Animals:  birds,  mammals,  invertebrates,  reptiles,  fish 

Corridors  exist  between  landscapes  and  are  features  or  habitats  that  facilitate  or  concentrate  flows 
of  organisms  across  landscape  boundaries  and  barrier  habitats.  For  example,  topographic  or  hydro- 
logic  features  which  occur  at  landscape  boundaries  provide  avenues  for  animals  and  plants  to 
disperse. 

Thus,  features  that:  1)  funnel  or  concentrate  wind  and  water  currents  provide  corridors  for  the  flow 
of  birds  and  insects,  airborne  seeds  and  pollen  and  aquatic  species  across  alien  habitats,  2)  modify 
snow  deposition  patterns  allowing  animals  to  cross  barrier  habitats  by  providing  bridges  across  water 
or  through  forested  areas  (interception),  and  3)  change  habitat  distribution  thereby  creating  a habitat 
projection  into  or  across  a barrier. 

Some  species  may  avoid  corridors  due  to  concentration  of  predators  in  the  corridors. 

II.  T&E,  proposed  and  sensitive  species 

Wolves,  lynx,  wolverines,  spotted  frogs  or  fish  moving  between  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  and  any 
of  the  surrounding  mixed  conifer  landscapes  would  probably  use  riparian  corridors  for  movements 
because  these  corridors  often  provide  habitat  they  require.  Some  prey  species  use  riparian  areas  in 
these  landscapes  for  cover  and  foraging. 


H - 5 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  ESS 


Appendix  H 


Similarly,  western  big-eared  bats,  boreal  owls,  three-toed  woodpeckers,  great  gray  owls  and  northern 
goshawks  may  move  along  them  since  prey,  cover  and  perches  may  occur  in  riparian  areas. 

Species  which  fly,  have  large  home  ranges,  or  are  habitat  generalists  (wolves,  wolverines,  North 
American  lynx,  western  big-eared  bats,  three-toed  woodpeckers,  great  gray  owls,  boreal  owls,  and 
northern  goshawks)  can  freely  move  among  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  and  surrounding  mixed 
conifer  landscapes. 

Wolves  are  able  to  travel  great  distances  and  utilize  a variety  of  habitats.  In  short,  they  are  adapted 
to  readily  move  across  landscape  boundaries  and  sub-optimal  habitats.  Dispersing  wolves  in  the 
northwest  have  been  known  to  travel  hundreds  of  miles,  crossing  many  different  habitat  types  and 
physiographic  features  (US  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service  1992).  While  these  large  canids  are  capable  of 
traveling  across  unsuitable  habitats,  mortality  increases  dramatically  where  roads  occur  or  in  land- 
scapes dominated  by  human  activity  (See  Appendix  F:  Biological  Assessment  for  wolves). 

Similarly,  lynx  and  wolverine  are  large  predators  which  cover  many  habitats  in  search  of  prey, 
although  both  species  are  associated  with  specific  habitats.  Lynx,  in  particular,  are  largely  dependent 
on  snowshoe  hares  (see  Appendix  G1 : Biological  Evaluation,  ■Lynx'').  Wolverines  are  found  mainly 
in  remote  habitat  and  lynx  are  harvested  in  Idaho  as  a furbearer.  Therefore,  high  mortality  may  occur 
when  these  species  cross  landscapes  or  ecosystems  with  high  road  densities. 

The  movement  (or  flow)  of  wolverines  is  not  restricted  by  rivers,  highways,  valleys  or  major  mountain 
ranges  (Hornocker  and  Hash  1980)  Wolverines’  large  feet  make  them  well  suited  for  travel  over  snow 
(Hash  1987).  Any  wolverines  in  the  Moyer-Salt  landscape  should  be  able  to  travel  readily  between 
adjacent  landscapes. 

Western  big-eared  bats,  boreal  owls,  northern  three-toed  woodpeckers,  great  gray  owls  and  northern 
goshawks  probably  move  independently  of  habitat  corridors  at  the  landscape  scale  because  they  are 
adapted  for  flight.  Although  they  may  utilize  corridors  for  cover  when  foraging  or  to  avoid  predation 
when  moving  between  larger  blocks  of  suitable  habitat.  However,  all  are  capable  of  moving  across 
large  areas  of  unsuitable  habitat  in  search  of  foraging  areas  or  during  migration. 

The  spotted  frog  is  probably  the  least  able  of  the  non-fish  listed  species  to  travel  across  wide, 
inhospitable  habitats.  However,  this  amphibian  crosses  disparate  habitats  seasonally,  perhaps  by 
following  riparian  corridors.  Snake  River  Basin  sockeye,  Chinook  and  steelhead,  westslope  cutthroat 
and  bull  trout  are  the  listed  species  most  dependent  on  corridors  for  movements  between  ecosys- 
tems and  landscapes.  These  fish  all  require  continuous  flows  of  water,  and  specific  (sometimes 
species-specific)  environmental  parameters  in  streams  (temperature,  turbidity,  gradient,  etc.)  for 
movements  to  occur. 

Sii.  Plants 

One  of  major  corridors  for  movement  of  biotic  material  among  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  and 
surrounding  landscapes  are  riparian  corridors.  These  dendritic  water  courses  act  as  corridors  in 
three  ways.  First,  they  move  water  between  the  landscapes  (corridors  for  aquatic  vertebrate  and 
invertebrate  species  and  plant  seeds,  spores  and  pollen).  Second,  they  increase  the  quantity  and 
structure  of  vegetation  bordering  the  streams  which  create  thermal  and  hiding  cover  for  terrestrial 
vertebrate  and  invertebrate  species  in  which  to  move.  Last,  they  serve  as  cold  air  drainages  and  act 
to  move  plant  seed  and  pollen  and  invertebrates  on  wind  currents. 

Other  corridors  for  movement  of  biotic  material  between  these  landscapes  are:  roads  (such  as  the 
Salmon  River  Mountain  Road)  and  trails  (such  as  the  Moyer  jeep  trail).  Roads  and  trails  provide 
corridors  for  invading  plants  and  cursorial  (running)  animals.  Prevailing  general  and  local  winds  help 


H - 6 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


disperse  plant  seeds  and  pollen,  invertebrates  and  birds.  Plant  seeds  are  moved  indirectly  on  or  in 
animals  as  they  follow  roads  or  trails  or  funnel  through  geographic  features. 


II.  LANDSCAPE  ECOSYSTEMS  STRUCTURE:  PATCHES,  CORRIDORS,  AND  MATRICES 


A.  PATCH  ECOSYSTEMS 

We  have  elected  to  use  habitats,  land  forms  and  forest  stands  identified  from  forest  types  maps,  aerial 
photo  interpretation,  and  ground  reconnaissance  as  patches  in  this  analysis  of  the  Moyer  Salt 
Landscape.  We  have  made  the  assumption  that  each  forest  class  identified  represents  a different 
patch  or  corridor.  Table  H-1  displays  the  total  acreages  by  forest  class  for  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape. 
The  non-forested  acres  are  represented  by  overlay  codes  40,  60,  and  90.  These  include  rock 
outcrops,  lakes,  ponds,  meadows  and  shrub/forb  vegetation.  All  other  overlay  codes  represent  forest 
types  that  vary  in  size,  density  and  steepness  of  ground  slope. 

1 . Heterogeneity  among  patches 

Heterogeneity  is  most  strongly  reflected  among  the  patches  in  vegetative  cover.  High  levels  of 
heterogeneity  exist  among  forested  and  non-forested  patches.  The  heterogeneity  lessens  when 
forested  patches  are  compared  with  other  forested  patches.  In  these  instances  the  characteristics 
that  differentiate  heterogeneity  or  that  describe  a patches’  degree  of  difference  to  another  patch 
become  tree  species,  size,  age  and  density,  edge  and  understory  vegetation,  all  of  which  reflect  site, 
slope  and  aspect. 

Heterogeneity  among  the  patches  in  a landscape  is  one  of  the  factors  that  comprises  diversity.  The 
spatial  relationships  of  the  patches  to  each  other  is  also  important.  A landscape  containing  varied 
forested  and  non-forested  patches  like  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  tends  to  have  greater  biological 
diversity  than  one  in  which  the  patches  are  similar.  According  to  Harris  (1984),  "the  full  spectrum  of 
genetic  resources  can  only  be  conserved  by  focusing  on  the  heterogeneous  landscape  mosaic." 

2.  Boundary  shape 

In  this  analysis  landscape,  at  higher  elevations  (above  7200  feet)  forested  ecosystems  are  nearly 
continuous  with  small  patches  of  shrub,  forb,  grass,  rock  or  water.  Below  7200  feet,  coniferous  forest 
appears  as  stringers  on  the  north  side  of  slopes  and  other  moist  areas.  These  stringers  have  irregular 
boundaries  that  follow  landforms  and  moisture  patterns.  The  edges  are  often  not  distinct,  the  density 
of  the  forest  decreases  as  it  nears  the  limits  of  moisture.  Boundary  shape  is  important  because  a 
convoluted  boundary  between  matrix  and  patch  or  between  two  landscapes  tends  to  promote  the 
interchange  or  flow  of  biotic  and  abiotic  materials.  The  greater  interchange  results  because  the 
boundary  is  longer  in  relationship  to  the  area  contained  (Forman  and  Godron,  1986). 

3.  Edge  and  edge  effect 

The  boundary  of  an  ecosystem  or  patch  is  called  an  edge.  Edges  often  share  ecological  characteris- 
tics of  the  ecosystems  that  border  them.  Edges  vary  in  widths,  depending  upon  vegetation  types, 
ages,  and  conditions.  The  effect  these  edges  have  upon  animals,  plants  and  abiotic  materials  is 
called  the  "edge  effect." 

Edge  and  edge  effect  are  directly  related  to  the  level  of  heterogeneity  between  patches.  Generally 
as  the  amount  of  heterogeneity  between  the  two  ecological  elements  increases  so  does  the  edge 
effect.  For  example,  a patch  of  old  growth  that  is  surrounded  by  mature  timber  is  less  distinct  and 
therefore  has  less  edge  effect  than  an  old  growth  patch  surrounded  by  regeneration  areas  (Harris, 


H - 7 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  ESS 


Appendix  H 


1984).  Edge  effect  is  greatest  between  the  forested  communities  and  the  non-forested  ones.  Edge 
effect  is  greater  between  forested  stands  that  differ  in  species  composition  than  in  stands  of  the  same 
species  that  differ  in  structure  by  one  age  class. 

It  has  been  shown  that  maintaining  the  proper  ratio  and  juxtaposition  of  cover  and  foraging  area  is 
important  for  producing  high  quality  elk  and  mule  deer  habitat  (Towry  1984).  The  edges  between 
forested  and  non-forested  ecosystems  in  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  are  especially  attractive  to  these 
large  ungulates,  concentrating  them  and  the  animals  that  prey  on  them  throughout  all  but  the  winter 
months. 

The  affinity  of  some  species  for  the  interface  between  the  forested  and  non-forested  ecosystems  acts 
to  constrict  or  funnel  movements  and  flow  of  other  Sensitive  Species  and  their  prey,  as  well.  North 
American  lynx  benefit  from  edges  in  forested  ecosystems  as  the  increased  shrubby  vegetation 
associated  with  early  serai  stages  and  riparian  areas  in  timber  habitat  types  provides  cover  and 
forage  for  snowshoe  hares  (see  Appendix  F:  Biological  Evaluation,  "Lynx").  While  great  gray  owls, 
boreal  owls  and  northern  goshawks  often  nest  in  the  interior  of  forested  patches,  these  species  are 
known  to  forage  along  the  interface  of  forested/non-forested  patches  and  riparian/forested  patches 
(Spahr  et  al.  1991;  Jones  1979).  Similarly,  western  big-eared  bats  are  known  to  forage  in  riparian 
areas  and  open  meadows. 

Three-toed  woodpeckers  have  habitat  preferences  for  the  interior  of  forested  patches.  However,  the 
occurrence  of  fire  increases  the  number  of  snags  in  timbered  patches.  As  a result,  this  species  is 
attracted  to  forested  patches  that  have  recently  burned,  as  well. 

Lemhi  penstemon  is  often  found  growing  along  the  edge  between  forested  and  non-forested  patch- 
es. This  species  occurs  where  patches  are  disturbed  or  where  roads  are  constructed  through 
patches,  (see  Appendix  F:  Biological  Evaluation) 

4.  Homogeneity  among  patches 

Fourteen  (or  78  percent)  of  the  forest  classes  in  the  analysis  landscape  are  forest  communities.  These 
stands  comprise  73  percent  of  the  analysis  landscape  acreage.  The  stands  are  homogeneous  in  that 
they  support  trees  as  overstory  vegetation  with  smaller  trees,  shrubs,  grasses  and  forbs  in  the 
understory.  The  forested  ecosystems  are  comprised  of  conifers.  In  general,  all  of  the  forest  ecosys- 
tems have  the  potential  to  grow  trees  up  to  at  least  12  inches  in  DBH  and  to  provide  a minimum  of 
50  percent  vegetative  cover  in  the  form  of  mature  trees. 

Four  (or  22  percent)  of  the  forest  classes  are  non-forest  ecosystems  but  comprise  over  27  percent 
of  the  landscape  acreage.  These  ecosystems  do  not  support  an  overstory  of  trees  (or  the  stocking 
is  very  low)  and  some  areas  are  covered  mainly  by  rock  or  rock  fragments  where  lichens  are  the  only 
vegetative  cover. 

5.  Patch  dllsturbance/recovery  regimes 

Disturbances  are  events  that  cause  major  changes  in  the  normal  ecological  functioning  of  the 
landscape,  ecosystem,  patch  or  corridor.  These  often  set  back  ecological  succession  to  an  earlier 
stage.  Disturbance  regimes  are  the  recurring  patterns  of  disturbance  in  a landscape,  for  example, 
a pattern  of  recurring  lightning-caused  fires  or  annual  floods  in  a landscape.  Recovery  regimes  are 
the  recurring  processes  that  systems  undergo  after  the  disturbance,  usually  a progression  of  sera! 
stages  which  are  characteristic  for  a particular  habitat  type. 

Ecosystems  possess  particular  disturbance/recovery  regimes.  These  patterns  of  disturbance/ 
recovery  can  be  used  to  predict  how  landscapes  will  recover  from  disturbance.  Understanding  the 
natural  regimes  is  important  because  it  may  help  us  predict  the  ecosystem’s  response  to  man-caused 


H - 8 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


disturbances,  such  as  timber  harvest.  We  can  try  to  tailor  timber  harvest  areas  to  replicate  natural 
disturbance/recovery  regimes. 

In  the  absence  of  timber  harvest,  fire  is  and  has  been  the  most  common  and  severe  of  the  disturbance 
regimes  in  the  analysis  landscape.  Forested  and  non-forested  ecosystems  respond  differently  to 
disturbance  agents  like  fire.  While  fire  may  set  both  types  of  ecosystems  back  to  the  earliest 
successional  stage  (bare  mineral  soil),  the  grass/forb/shrub  habitat  types  may  be  reestablished 
within  a relatively  short  time.  However,  forested  habitat  types,  in  the  climax  stage  take  hundreds  of 
years  to  become  reestablished  in  the  analysis  area. 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


Table  H-1 : FOREST  CLASS  TOTALS  FOR  THE  MOYER  SALT  EIS  ANALYSIS  AREA 


Overlay 

Code 

Class  Description 

Total 

Acres 

Percent  of 
Total 

1 

DF,  moderate  slope,  mature 

3386 

9.0 

2 

DF,  moderate  slope,  immature 

6275 

16.8 

3 

DF,  steep,  mature 

1128 

3.3 

4 

DF,  steep,  immature 

1716 

4.6 

5 

DF  Poles,  moderate  slope 

163 

0.4 

14 

PP  or  PP/DF  mix,  Seedling  & Saplings,  moderate  slope 

7 

<0.1 

17 

AF,  ES,  or  LP  Mix,  moderate  slope,  mature 

2327 

6.2 

18 

AF,  ES,  or  LP  Mix,  moderate  slopes,  immature 

4909 

13.1 

19 

AF,  ES,  or  LP  Mix,  Poles,  moderate  slope 

5451 

14.6 

20 

AF,  ES,  LP  mix, Seedlings  & Saplings,  Mod.slope 

303 

0.8 

22 

LP  moderate  slope,  immature 

543 

1.5 

23 

LP  Poles,  moderate  slope 

1151 

3.1 

33 

Deforested,  PP  or  DF  moderate  slope 

17 

<0.1 

40 

Unproductive  (productivity/  potential  20  ft3/ac/yr 

4402 

11.8 

60 

Non-forest  (less  than  16.7%  stocking  of  trees) 

5517 

14.7 

90 

Water 

7 

<0.1 

817 

Unsuitable  for  Timber  Management,  AF,  ES,  or  LP  Mix, 
Mature 

35.6 

0.1 

819 

Unsuitable  for  Timber  Management,  AF,  ES,  or  LP  Mix, 
Poles 

24 

<0.1 

TOTALS 

37,433 

100 

NOTE  1:  The  total  acreage  is  larger  than  the  33,000  for  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  because  some 
of  the  timber  types  (patches)  extend  into  contiguous  landscapes. 


H - 10 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


Table  H-2:  Forest  Class  Category  Descriptions 


Size 

Seedlings 
Saplings 
Post  and  Pole 
Immature 

Mature 

up  to  0.99  inches  DBH 

1.00"  - 2.99"DBH 

3.00“  - 4.99"DBH 

5.00"  - 8.99"DBH 

(6.99"lodgepole) 

9.00"+  DBH  (7.00"  lodgepole) 

Species 

Douglas-fir 
Ponderosa  Pine 

Douglas-fir,  Ponderosa  Pine  mix 

Alpine  fir,  Englemann  spruce,  or  lodgepole  mix 

Lodgepole 

DF 

PP 

PP/DF 

AF,  ES,  LP  mix 
IP 

Slope 

Moderate 

Steep 

<60%  quartzites,  <45%  on  oth- 
er soils 

>60%  quartzites,  >45%  other 

Not  forested 

Unproductive,  not  capable  of  growing  trees  (i.e. 
rocky  escarpments  or  too  dry),  shallow  soils 
Unproductive,  burned  and  not  yet  revegetated 
Non-forest,  some  trees  but  less  that  16.7% 
stocking  of  them 

Unsuitable 

For  some  reason  (i.e.,  slope  steepness,  old 
growth  retention,  etc.)  these  areas  are  not  suit- 
able for  timber  harvesting. 

B.  CORRIDOR  ECOSYSTEMS 

Forman  and  Godron  (1986)  identified  three  types  of  corridors,  line,  strip  and  stream  corridors. 
Depending  on  the  characteristics  of  the  corridor  and  species  considered,  corridors  can  function  as 
travel  routes  or  as  barriers  to  travel,  as  required  habitat  or  as  routes  to  access  required  habitats 
(Harris,  1984). 

1.  Strip  Corridor  (riparian  buffer  strips) 

A strip  corridor  is  a comparatively  wide  band  of  habitat  with  a central  environment  that  contains 
species  dependent  on  interior  habitat  type.  This  type  of  corridor  is  usually  less  common  than  line 
corridors  in  a landscape.  Types  of  corridors  are  scale-dependent  and  vary  with  the  species  consid- 
ered. The  continuous  forested  ridgelines  of  the  Salmon  River  Mountains  crest  may  serve  as  a strip 
corridor  for  some  species.  As  an  example,  several  listed  species  are  wide-ranging  animals  (wolves, 
wolverine  and  lynx)  which  have  large  home  ranges  and  could  use  this  corridor  for  dispersal  and  to 
access  different  landscapes. 


H - 11 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  E1S 


Appendix  H 


Similarly,  corridor  function  can  change  seasonally  for  some  species. 

2.  Line  Corridors  (roads) 

A line  corridor  is  narrower  than  a strip  corridor,  and  differs  in  its  absence  of  interior  habitat.  It  is 
dominated  by  edge  species.  Roads,  trails  and  some  of  the  stringers  of  forested  ridges  which  intrude, 
finger-like,  into  shrub/forb  ecosystems  at  lower  elevations  in  the  analysis  landscape  are  examples  of 
line  corridors. 

Approximately  50  miles  of  road  corridors  currently  exist  in  the  landscape.  These  range  from  jeep  trails 
to  well-maintained,  Forest  two-lane  gravel  roads.  They  provide  motorized  access  to  the  lower,  middle 
and  upper  slope  areas  in  the  landscape.  Low-standard  roads  are  not  maintained  for  travel  purposes 
and  can  be  difficult  to  drive.  Even  roads  that  are  difficult  to  drive  can  be  used  for  travel  routes  by  ATVs, 
horses,  and  foot  travel.  Some  wildlife  species  may  use  these  routes  for  travel. 

3.  Stream  corridors 

Stream  corridors  border  water  courses  and  vary  in  width  according  to  the  size  of  the  stream  (Forman 
and  Godron,  1986).  They  control  water  and  mineral  nutrient  runoff,  reducing  siltation.  A wide  stream 
corridor  may  also  serve  as  a strip  corridor  for  some  species. 

The  predominant  wetlands  in  the  area  are  riparian  spruce  wetlands.  These  wetlands  are  found 
adjacent  to  Woodtick  Creek  and  its  tributaries.  This  wetland  type  is  characterized  by  an  Engelmann 
spruce  (Picea  engelmannii)  overstory.  Aspen  (Populus  tremuloides),  alder  (Alnus  incana)  and/or 
(A.sinuata)  and  water  birch  (Betula  occidentals)  may  be  present.  The  understory  often  includes  red 
osier  dogwood  (Cornus  stolonifera),  Woods  rose  (Rosa  woodsii),  elderberry  (Sambucus  canaden- 
sis), gooseberry  (Ribes  inerme)  and  thimbleberry  (Rubus  parviflora). 

Several  stream  corridors  exist  in  the  analysis  area.  Valleys  are  steep  and  U-shaped  at  their  headwa- 
ters, trending  towards  V-shaped  valley  bottoms,  typical  of  the  Salmon  River  Mountains. 

Approximately  30  miles  (Salt,  Perm  and  South  portion  of  Woodtick  drainages)  of  riparian  corridors 
exist.  Small,  high  elevation  ponds  and  wet  meadows  drain  into  dendritic  streams.  These  corridors 
provide  travel  and  migration  routes  through  a wide  range  of  ecosystems  for  some  species. 

a.  Nodes 

Nodes  (where  corridors  widen),  narrows  (where  corridors  constrict)  and  the  intersection  of  two  or 
more  corridors  are  places  of  special  ecological  importance.  These  sites  act  as  funnels  or  collection 
places  for  animals  and  plants  and  thus  collection  places  for  nutrients  and  energy.  When  the  corridors 
involved  are  riparian  corridors,  their  importance  is  increased  both  because  of  the  presence  of  water 
in  an  arid  environment  and  because  these  corridors  are  connected  with  other  riparian  corridors. 

Nodes  in  corridors  occur  in  the  analysis  landscape  where  streams  join,  where  forested  corridors 
meet,  and  where  meadows  intersect. 

b.  Heterogeneity 

Corridors  in  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  are  homogeneous  in  habitat  over  much  of  their  length. 
However,  some  corridors  do  change  with  elevation  and  aspect.  This  heterogeneity  is  obvious  in  the 
analysis  landscape  where  forested  corridors  change  with  aspect  from  Douglas-fir  dominated  to 
subalpine  fir  dominated  communities.  Large  patches  of  shrubs  and  forbs  are  often  found  on  south 
or  west  facing  slopes,  at  lower  elevation.  Smaller  patches  are  found  at  higher  elevations. 


H - 12 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


c.  Disturbance/recovery  regimes 

Disturbance  and  recovery  regimes  in  all  three  types  of  corridors  in  the  analysis  landscape  are  related 
to  fire,  water,  insects  and  drought.  Prior  to  1900,  fire  played  the  most  significant  role  in  modifying 
habitat  in  corridors  in  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape. 

Fire  history  is  poorly  understood  in  these  types  (Bradley,  Fischer,  Noste,  1992).  Usually,  fire  is  a less 
frequent  disturbance  on  moist  or  wet  sites  than  in  the  rest  of  the  landscape.  Fires  may  be  more  severe 
in  effect,  because  of  a higher  density  of  vegetation  and  because  rhizomes  and  seeds  of  undergrowth 
that  grow  in  the  organic  layer  of  soil  may  be  consumed.  At  higher  elevations,  slower  decomposition 
rates,  increase  the  down-fuel  loading.  Low  smoldering  fires  are  most  common  in  wet  areas.  This 
removes  small  groups  of  trees  rather  than  an  entire  stand  or  drainage  in  these  wet  communities. 

d.  Aquatic  Habitats  for  TE&S  fish  species 

The  highly  migratory  nature  of  anadromousfish  species,  like  the  Chinook  salmon  requires  uninterrupt- 
ed aquatic  travel  routes  between  freshwater  spawning  and  rearing  habitats  and  oceanic  feeding 
grounds  used  during  most  of  the  adult  life  of  the  fish.  These  routes  must  be  available  throughout  the 
period  of  juvenile  out-migration,  and  once  again  throughout  the  period  of  adult  migration  to  inland 
spawning  reaches. 

General  habitat  requirements  vary  by  life  stage,  with  clean  gravel  substrates  and  water  temperatures 
of  40-55  degrees  F required  for  successful  spawning,  and  clear,  cool  streams  with  good  cover 
provided  by  vegetation,  organic  debris,  or  boulders  are  required  for  successful  juvenile  Chinook 
salmon  rearing  (USDA  Forest  Service  1991) 

Bull  trout  and  Westslope  cutthroat  trout  require  cool,  clear,  well-oxygenated  streams,  and  prefer  slow 
water  pool  habitats.  Both  species  may  spend  their  entire  lives  in  cold  headwater  areas,  or  they  may 
migrate  to  more  productive  feeding  waters  of  larger  streams  or  lakes  and  tributary  or  headwater 
spawning  areas  within  smaller  streams.  These  journeys  require  full  passage  capabilites  between 
adult  and  spawning/rearing  areas  during  the  periods  when  these  migrations  occur. 


C.  MATRIX  ECOSYSTEM 

The  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  conifer  matrix  consists  of  73  percent  forested  and  27  percent  non-forested 
habitats.  This  matrix  is  characterized  by  conifer  stands  composed  of  different  tree  species  and  of 
trees  of  different  sizes  and  age  classes.  Some  of  the  forested  ecosystems  in  the  analysis  landscape 
are  predominated  by  one  age  class  while  others  are  multi-aged.  Douglas-fir  forest  and  mixed  conifer 
forests  each  comprise  approximately  1/3  of  the  landscape.  Patch  sizes  range  from  8 acres  to  1093 
acres  for  Douglas-fir  and  7 acres  to  2,545  acres  for  mixed  conifer.  Pure  lodgepole  pine  stands 
comprise  about  5 percent  or  1700  acres  of  the  landscape.  The  remainder  of  the  landscape  consists 
of  shrubs  and  forbs,  sometimes  with  scattered  trees,  rock  outcrops  and  wetlands. 

Many  of  the  forested  ecosystems  have  more  than  one  tree  species  represented  in  the  stand.  In 
addition  to  conifer  trees,  a variety  of  shrub  and  non-woody  piant  species  are  present  in  the  conifer 
forested  matrix.  (For  a description  of  habitat  types  see  chapter  3-16  in  the  main  document.) 

The  conifer  forest  matrix  is  the  predominant  ecological  influence  in  the  landscape.  The  presence  of 
Douglas-fir  forest  and  mixed  conifer  forest  varies  with  elevation  and  aspect,  with  most  of  the  Douglas- 
fir  type  occurring  at  the  lower  elevations  (below  7,500  feet)  on  the  west  1/2  of  the  landscape.  These 
patches  are  usually  found  on  southern  and  westerly  aspects.  They  are  also  found  on  northerly 
aspects  at  lower  elevations. 


H - 13 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  ESS 


Appendix  H 


The  upper  slopes  and  northerly  aspects  support  a lodgepole  pine  community  comprised  of  lodge- 
pole  pine  stands  and  mixed  conifer  stands  of  lodgepole  pine,  Engelmann  spruce  and  subalpine  fir. 
Relatively  pure  stands  of  subalpine  fir  or  Engelmann  spruce  are  present  along  stream  bottoms  and 
in  wet  basins  interspersed  with  small  wet  meadows. 

Whitebark  pine  and  subalpine  fir  grow  on  high  elevation  ridges. 


SIS.  PATCH  AND  CORRIDOR  FUNCTION  WITHIN  THE  LANDSCAPE 

Forman  and  Godron  (1 986)  have  defined  function  as  'the  interaction  among  spatial  elements,  that 
is,  the  flow  of  energy,  materials,  and  species  among  the  component  elements...  Determining  and 
predicting  these  flows  or  interactions  among  landscape  elements  (ecosystems)  is  understanding 
landscape  function.” 

A.  ECOSYSTEM  CONNECTIVENESS 

Connectivity  is  a measure  of  how  spatially  continuous  a corridor  or  matrix  is  (Forman  and  Godron 
1 986).  Since  the  presence  or  absence  of  breaks  in  a corridor  is  considered  the  most  important  factor 
in  determining  the  effectiveness  of  both  conduit  and  barrier  functions,  connectivity  is  the  primary 
measure  of  corridor  function  (Merriam,  1984;  Baudry,  1984;  Forman  and  Godron  1986).  When 
connectivity  occurs  as  an  intersecting  or  thin,  elongated  strip,  the  elements  may  function  as  a series 
of  corridors  facilitating  both  migration  and  gene  exchange  among  species.  However,  a high  level  of 
connectivity  in  a landscape  corridor  has  several  consequences  since  elements  may  function  as  either 
physical  barriers,  separating  other  elements,  or  as  conduits  linking  elements  depending  on  the 
species  considered.  For  instance,  a riparian  area  can  act  as  either  an  effective  physical  and  biological 
barrier  or  as  a conduit  between  two  landscape  elements. 

In  some  cases,  an  element  may  encircle  other  landscape  elements  and  create  isolated  biological 
"islands"  which  are  genetically  isolated  from  other  populations  of  independent  species.  Thus,  within 
the  same  landscape,  populations  of  mice,  butterflies,  and  clover  may  be  genetically  isolated  if 
separated  by  barrier  elements  (Forman  and  Godron,  1986). 

B.  POROSITY  OF  ECOSYSTEMS 

Porosity  is  a measure  of  the  density  of  patches  in  a landscape,  regardless  of  patch  size  (Forman  and 
Godron  1986).  It  is  measured  by  counting  the  number  of  patches  with  closed  boundaries  that  lie 
within  the  landscape.  The  greater  the  number  of  closed  patches,  the  greater  the  porosity. 

Porosity  is  linked  to  the  genetic  variability  and  isolation  of  some  species  present  in  the  landscape, 
and  as  such  it  provides  a basis  for  determining  the  threat  to  biodiversity  when  considering  ecosystem 
modifications  like  timber  sales  or  fires.  The  existing  porosity  within  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  is  208 
forested  patches  and  228  non-forested  patches  for  a total  of  436  patches  in  the  landscape. 

Porosity  and  genetic  variability 

Since  porosity  is  an  overall  indicator  of  the  degree  of  species  isolation  and,  therefore,  of  the  potential 
genetic  variability  present  within  populations  of  animals  and  plants  in  a landscape,  it  can  serve  as 
an  comparative  indicator  of  biological  diversity  (Forman  and  Godron  1986). 

Edge  effect  and  porosity 

Landscape  porosity  is  related  to  foraging  for  some  species,  since  the  density  and  arrangement 
of  suitable  patches  is  an  important  component  of  habitat  quality  (Forman  and  Godron  1986). 


H - 14 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


Porosity  is  also  an  index  of  the  amount  of  edge  (and  thus  the  edge  effect)  present  in  a 
landscape.  Edge  width  is  related  to  several  factors  including  local  wind  patterns,  sun  penetra- 
tion and  differences  in  the  structure  of  the  patches  or  the  patch  and  the  surrounding  matrix 
concerned  (Forman  and  Godron  1986).  Edge  length  and  width  are  factors  that  have  many 
implications  for  wildlife  management  (Leopold  1 933).  Edges  often  have  a different  complement 
of  species  inhabiting  them  and  the  abundance  of  individuals  in  an  edge  is  often  different  than 
found  in  the  interior  of  either  adjoining  patch.  Sometimes  edge  species  replace  interior  species 
when  the  interior  of  patches  are  modified  and  the  effective  edge  between  the  two  patches  is 
increased  or  a new  edge  is  created.  This  change  in  habitat  can  lead  to  an  increase  in  predation 
on  interior  species  by  edge  predators  and  an  increase  in  interspecific  competition  (Wilcox 
1985). 

The  edge  portion  of  a landscape  element  function  could  be  compared  to  that  of  a semi- 
permeable  membrane,  filtering  the  flows  in  and  out  of  the  element.  Although  the  edge  effect 
refers  to  the  structural  characteristics  of  the  edge,  particularly  the  organisms,  this  effect  refers 
to  how  the  edge  affects  flow.  Flows  may  be  described  as  movement  across  the  edge,  such 
as  drifting  snow  or  sand  being  intercepted  by  the  dense  vegetation  of  a woods  border,  or  as 
movements  along  the  edge,  such  as  herbivores  and  predators  using  the  edge  as  a conduit 
(Forman  and  Godron,  1986).  Generally  there  is  more  of  an  edge  effect  between  forested  and 
non-forested  communities  than  between  different  forested  communities,  because  the  hetero- 
geneity between  these  patches  is  great. 

Many  species  of  flying  vertebrates  (birds  and  mammals)  and  invertebrates  follow  the  edges 
of  patches  when  they  move  across  the  landscape.  In  addition,  many  species  follow  corridor 
edges  when  moving  across  or  around  patches  that  lack  structural  diversity  (shrub/grassland 
habitat).  Therefore,  edges  of  patches  that  border  meadows,  riparian  corridors  and  timber 
stringers  are  of  particular  importance  as  travel  ways  for  many  species. 

Conversely,  low  porosity  sometimes  indicates  the  presence  of  remote  habitat  in  a landscape, 
a condition  that  is  important  for  species  which  require  habitat  distant  from  boundaries  (Forman 
and  Godron  1986,  p.  170).  An  example  would  be  interior  old-growth  dependent  species. 

In  addition,  the  edge  between  forested  and  non-forested  ecosystems  affects  the  non-forested 
patch  by  altering  the  evaporation  rates  and  surface  wind  speeds.  Hedgerow  studies  indicate 
that  evaporation  could  be  reduced  for  a distance  of  up  to  1 6 times  the  height  of  the  edge  forest. 
Also,  the  studies  show  that  wind  speeds  could  be  reduced  for  distances  of  up  to  28  times  the 
height  of  the  forested  edge  (Forman  and  Godron  1986). 

C.  T&E,  P,  AND  S Species  and  Porosity/Connectivity 

No  TEPS  animal  species  are  known  to  be  indigenous  only  to  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape.  This  means 
that  of  the  known  animals  and  plants  that  occur  in  the  landscape  all  are  genetically  connected  with 
conspecific  populations  in  other  landscapes.  Therefore,  we  can  conclude  that  resident  species  are 
adapted  to  the  current  level  of  porosity  and  connectivity  in  the  landscape.  Since  the  Moyer  Salt 
Landscape  is  composed  of  436  patches  with  a mean  size  of  86  acres.  Since  habitat  "perception"  is 
scale-related,  it  is  not  surprising  that  higher  order  animals  which  have  relatively  large  home  ranges 
have  remained  genetically  linked  to  populations  in  other  landscapes.  However,  the  distribution  and 
taxonomy  of  plants  in  east  central  Idaho  has  not  been  thoroughly  investigated  and  very  little  is  known 
about  invertebrates  that  occur  there.  Some  endemic  species  of  invertebrates  and  varieties  of  plants 
in  the  analysis  landscape  may  have  become  reproductively  isolated  some  time  in  the  past  and  are 
now  genetically  distinct. 

All  but  one  of  the  T&E,  P and  S animal  species  which  could  potentially  occur  in  the  Moyer  Salt 
Landscape  are  either  species  with  large  home  ranges  or  flying  species  which  can  cross  or  frequent 


H - 15 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


various  habitats.  The  exception  is  the  spotted  frog.  A survey  of  spotted  frogs  has  not  been  conducted 
on  the  Salmon  National  Forest,  and  we  do  not  know  if  this  species  occurs  in  the  analysis  landscape. 
There  are  no  obvious  barriers  to  spotted  frogs  in  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape.  Spotted  frogs  can  move 
between  patches  of  appropriate  habitat  and  along  riparian  and  timber  corridors.  Spotted  frogs  have 
been  found  at  various  locations  throughout  the  forest,  therefore,  we  can  assume  that  spotted  frogs 
have  the  ability  to  colonize  and  maintain  genetic  connections  in  habitat  patches  which  are  geographi- 
cally separated. 

The  only  T,  E,  P or  S plant  species  thought  to  occur  in  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  is  Lemhi  penstemon. 
This  plant  has  a simple  dispersal:  the  capsules  open  and  the  seeds  fall  out  and  take  root  near  the 
plant.  Apparently,  seeds  of  this  plant  are  not  transported  by  animals  or  wind.  This  type  of  dispersion 
requires  that  appropriate  growing  habitats  be  connected  so  that  individuals  can  colonize  habitats  in 
successive  steps.  Lemhi  penstemon  is  found  in  a variety  of  habitats  from  open-forested  patches  to 
shrub/steppe  habitat.  This  habitat  tolerance  allows  the  plant  to  move  from  landscape  to  landscape 
by  way  of  appropriate  habitat  patches. 

Many  species  cannot  survive  in  one  ecosystem  and  must  cross  ecosystem  boundaries  to  obtain  food, 
water  and/or  shelter.  Landscape  heterogeneity  is  the  fundamental  cause  of  species  movement. 
Observations  predict  that  topographic,  vegetational,  and  soil  heterogeneity  determine  most  of  the 
movement  patterns  of  large  animals  (Forman  and  Godron  1986).  Many  species  will  avoid  passing 
through  certain  ecosystems  that  place  their  life  at  risk  due  to  exposure  or  predation  (Forman  and 
Godron  1986).  The  following  is  a list  of  T&E,  P,  and  S species  and  the  community  types  they  are 
thought  to  avoid  or  select.  Where  habitat  preferences  are  not  known,  a blank  space  appears. 
Information  is  based  on  the  biological  evaluations  and  assessments  in  Appendix  E and  on  Harris 
(1984),  Spahr  et  al.  (1991),  and  Hornocker  and  Hash  (1981). 


H - 16 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


Table  H-3:  TEPS  Select/ Avoidance  Communities 


COMMU- 

NITY 

Wolf 

Lynx 

Wolverine 

Goshawk 

Boreal 

owl 

G.Gray 

owl 

B.E  Bat 

Three-toed 

Woodpecker 

Spotted 

Frog 

DF  Mature 

Select 

Select 

Select 

Select 

Select 

Select 

DF  Immature 

AF/ES/LP, 

Mature 

Select 

Select 

Select 

Select 

Select 

Select 

Select 

AF/ES/LP, 

Imm. 

AF/ES/LP, 

Regen/ 

sapling 

Select 

Avoid 

LP  Mature 

Select 

Select 

Select 

Select 

LP  Immature 

LP 

Regen./sapl. 

Select 

Avoid 

Rock,  No 
Veg. 

Avoid 

Avoid 

Avoid 

Avoid 

Avoid 

Avoid 

Avoid 

Shrub/ 

steppe 

Select 

Avoid 

Avoid 

Select 

Avoid 

Riparian  Area 

Select 

Select 

Select 

Select 

Select 

Clearcut 

Avoid 

Avoid 

Avoid 

Avoid 

Select 

Avoid 

Avoid  = Species  is  suspected  to  avoid  this  community  on  the  basis  of  available  literature.  However,  for  most  of  these  species  this  community  is 
not  a barrier  to  travel  if  the  patch  is  small  enough. 

Select  = species  is  reported  to  occupy  this  habitat  at  least  part  of  the  year. 


D.  FLOW 

1.  Plants  and  animals 

Animals  and  plants  cross  landscapes  by  moving  along  routes  that  are  regular  and  that  are  deter- 
mined by  natural  disturbance,  soil  type,  ecosite  features,  and  human  influence  (Forman  and  Godron, 
1986). 

Species  with  specific  environmental  requirements  not  generally  present  in  the  landscape  use  "rest 
stops"  and  "stepping  stones"  to  cross  landscapes.  Ecosystems  that  possess  the  necessary  environ- 
mental requirements  for  a species  and  which  become  its  preferred  habitat  are  those  that  are  located 
close  enough  to  one  another  or  contain  adequate  rest  stops  so  that  the  organism  can  successfully 
travel  from  one  location  to  another.  For  example,  Findley  and  Anderson  (1 956)  discovered  that  the 
existence  of  riparian  forests  which  could  be  used  as  dispersal  corridors  was  critical  to  the  distribution 
of  many  species. 

The  maximum  distance  between  stepping  stones  is  specific  to  particular  organisms.  For  instance, 
wolves  can  travel  much  greater  distances  than  voles  between  rest  stops  or  stepping  stones.  Harris 


H - 17 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


(1984)  has  indicated  that  when  addressing  movement  of  a particular  species  within  and  across 
landscapes,  four  factors  should  be  considered:  1)  the  linear  distance  between  acceptable  habitats, 
2)  requirements  related  to  sedentary  versus  migratory  species,  3)  habitat  specificity  (how  specific  the 
species’  habitat  requirements  are),  and  4)  tolerance  for  variation  in  its  habitat.  The  combined  effects 
of  these  factors  seem  to  operate  most  significantly  on  amphibians  and  reptiles,  followed  by  mammals, 
permanent  resident  birds,  and  migratory  birds  (Harris,  1984). 

Interior  birds  and  small  mammals  may  not  be  able  to  use  or  cross  some  corridors  due  to  the  width 
of  the  corridor.  For  example,  riparian  corridors  may  be  too  narrow  for  some  birds  to  nest  in,  but  they 
could  use  them  for  travel.  On  the  other  hand,  large  streams  may  act  as  a travel  barrier  for  small 
mammals  and  non-flying  invertebrates.  In  some  cases  small  mammals  and  non-flying  invertebrates, 
may  find  bridges  to  be  corridors  or  barriers.  Similarly,  fallen  trees  across  streams,  roads  with  culverts 
or  with  bridges  facilitate  barrier  crossings. 

Findley  and  Anderson  (1 956)  found  that  the  distribution  of  mammal  species  in  the  Colorado  Rockies 
was  inversely  proportional  to  their  dependence  on  forests.  For  example,  species  which  depend 
exclusively  on  old-growth  are  distributed  over  a smaller  range  than  habitat  generalists.  Examples  of 
each  from  the  analysis  landscape  are  the  goshawk,  which  requires  mature/old  growth  forest  for 
nesting,  and  the  black  bear,  whose  habitat  spans  many  diverse  habitats  (Spahr  et  al.  1991;  Towry 
1984). 

Distribution  of  plant  species  is  dependent  on  long  and  short  distance  plant  dispersal  and  is  consid- 
ered a part  of  landscape  function.  Forman  and  Godron  (1986)  stated  that,  no  matter  what  the 
dispersal  mechanism  or  distance  traveled,  three  general  types  of  plant  movement  appear  to 
occur:  short-term  environmental  fluctuations,  long-term  changes,  and  new  species  introductions. 

Short-term  - Distribution  boundaries  of  plant  species  fluctuate  with  short-term,  usually  cyclic 
environmental  changes.  This  type  of  dispersal  occurs  with  annual  plants  Moyer  Salt  Land- 
scape. 

Some  plant  species  are  introduced  in  new  areas  and  spread  widely.  This  type  of  movement 
is  evidenced  by  the  recent  invasion  into  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  by  several  weed  species 
like  spotted  knapweed  ( Centaurea  maculosa)  and  cheatgrass  ( Bromus  tectorum). 

Long-term  - environmental  changes  cause  species  extinction,  adaptation  or  relocation. 

a.  Airborne  flows 

Airborne  flows  across  boundaries  occur  when  flying  vertebrates  and  invertebrates  and  plants  which 
produce  wind  dispersed  pollen  or  seeds  all  move  from  patch  to  patch  and  landscape  to  landscape. 
Examples  in  the  analysis  landscape  include:  goshawks,  western  big-eared  bats,  boreal  owls,  three- 
toed woodpecker,  great  gray  owls,  sagebrush  (A/temes/'a  spp.)  and  bull  thistle  Cirsium  vulgare.  In 
addition,  several  plants  in  the  analysis  landscape  depend  on  birds,  mammals,  and  insects  to  pick  up 
seeds  and  pollen  and  transport  them  across  patches.  Examples  include:  Clark’s  nutcrackers  ( Nu - 
cifrage  Columbiana),  which  strip  seeds  from  whitebark  pine  ( Pinus  albicaulis)  cones  and  then  inadver- 
tently plant  them  when  the  birds  make  seed  caches  in  other  patches  (Hutchins  and  Lanner  1982); 
furbearers  or  humans  which  pick  up  beggar  ticks  ( Bidens  cernua  ) in  their  fur  or  clothing  and  carry 
them  across  patch  boundaries;  bear  or  foxes  which  eat  rose  ( Rosa  woodsii)  hips  and  carry  them  to 
other  patches;  and  when  pollen  is  picked  up  on  the  pelage  (fur)  of  animals  or  the  bodies  of  cursorial 
insects  and  carried  across  patch  boundaries. 


H - 18 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


b.  Overland  flows 

Overland  flows  between  patches  and  landscapes  in  the  analysis  area  occur  when  cursorial  (adapted 
for  running)  and  fossorial  (adapted  for  burrowing)  animals  move  across  habitat  boundaries.  General- 
ly, the  patch  boundaries  within  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  are  not  barriers  to  large  terrestrial  species 
since  most  have  large  habitat  home  ranges  or  are  generalists. 

As  with  vertebrates,  overland  flows  occur  when  invertebrates  move  across  patch  boundaries,  either 
over  or  under  ground.  Invertebrates  are  the  most  numerous  animals  in  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  and 
the  least  understood.  No  baseline  data  on  invertebrate  populations  or  species  occurrence  have  been 
collected  in  the  analysis  landscape.  We  do  not  know  which  species  find  patch  boundaries  to  be 
barriers. 

Examples  of  overland  flow  of  invertebrates  and  plants  are:  furbearers  or  humans  who  pick  up  beggar 
ticks  (Bidens  cernua)  in  their  fur  or  clothing  and  carry  them  across  patch  boundaries:  bears  or  foxes 
who  eat  rose  (Rosa  woodsii)  hips  and  carry  seeds  to  other  patches;  and  pollen,  picked  up  on  the 
fur  of  animals  or  the  bodies  of  insect  and  carried  across  patch  boundaries. 

Overland  flows  of  TEPS  species  occur  when  cursorial  animals  like  wolves,  wolverines  and  lynx  move 
from  one  patch  to  another.  Considering  the  home  range  and  movement  patterns  of  these  species 
and  the  small  size  of  most  of  the  patches  in  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape,  it  is  doubtful  that  any  of  the 
patch  boundaries  act  as  barriers  to  these  species.  Spotted  frogs  are  reported  to  move  overland 
seasonally  and  may  cross  some  patch  boundaries  during  this  time  (see  Appendix  G:  BE  “Spotted 
Frogs"). 


2.  Energy 

Energy,  nutrients,  and  most  species  move  from  one  ecosystem  element  to  another  in  a landscape; 
none  is  static.  Much  of  the  energy  flows  and  movements  of  a landscape  follow  dendritic  patterns  as 
does  water  in  landscapes  with  steep  terrain.  Harris  (1 984)  states: 

"Although  greater  amounts  of  potential  energy  may  be  associated  with  high  elevation  upland 
systems,  this  energy  is  generally  more  diffuse  and  less  utilizable.  The  generally  more  usable 
forms  of  energy  occur  in  the  concentrated  pathways  (streams  and  riparian  strips)  and/or 
lower-elevation  floodplain  sites.  These  sites  will  manifest  higher  primary  and  secondary  pro- 
ductivity and  will  support  higher  densities  of  wildlife.  Since  the  energy  sources  are  diverse  .... 
, the  food  web  will  be  correspondingly  complex.  Because  of  the  diversity  and  productivity  of 
the  food  chains,  the  ratio  of  carnivores  to  herbivores  will  generally  increase  ...." 

In  addition,  young  forests  may  be  an  energy  source  and  old  forests  may  be  a nutrient  and  energy 
sink  (as  in  the  case  of  a carbon  sink).  Edge  may  also  be  a sink  for  water  and  snow  melt. 

The  goshawk  finds  much  of  its  food  in  open  forested  areas  or  meadows.  Therefore,  these  vegetative 
communities  are  the  energy  and  nutrients  source  while  the  older  forest  communities  which  serve  as 
nesting  and  rearing  areas  are  the  sink. 

Fish  have  source/sink  relationships  to  their  ecosystems  also  and  by  feeding  in  some  areas  and 
resting  in  others. 

One  example  of  how  the  source/sink  function  effects  plants  is  in  the  role  of  effective  precipitation. 
Edges  between  densely  forested  and  lightly  or  non-forested  patches  are  known  for  heavy  snow 
accumulation.  These  areas  of  additional  snow  can  result  in  more  usable  water  for  plants  and  as  other 
environmental  modifications,  such  as  cooler  average  temperatures,  delays  of  early  plant  budding, 
and  early  frost  damage  to  plants. 


H - 19 


Moyer  Sait  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


Vector  of  energy  flow: 

Wind,  surface  water  and  subsurface  water  flows  are  all  vectors  for  the  movement  of  energy  and 
contribute  greatly  to  ecosystems  and  landscape  function. 

Wind  flows  are  very  important  in  the  process  of  snow  drifting,  seed  and  pollen  dissemination, 
cold  and  warm  air  drainage,  fire  spread  patterns  and  the  movement  of  insects  and  disease. 

Water  flows  and  their  relationship  to  landscape  ecology  are  not  yet  fully  understood,  but  are 
known  to  be  very  important.  Some  functions  include:  transfer  of  nutrients  and  soil,  water  for 
plant  and  animals,  barriers  to  animal  and  plant  movement  and  barriers  to  disturbance  agents 
like  fire. 

E.  RESISTANCE  TO  FLOW 

Landscape  resistance  addresses  the  ease  with  which  wind,  water,  plants  and  animals  move  across 
ecosystem  boundaries.  Forman  and  Godron  (1986)  state  that  boundary  crossing  frequency  is  a 
general,  easily  measured  indicator  of  landscape  resistance. 

Boundary  crossing  frequency  is  a measure  of  the  number  of  boundaries  per  unit  of  length 
that  an  object  crosses  in  moving  across  a landscape  (Forman  and  Godron  1 986).  For  example, 
a deer  may  begin  at  one  side  of  the  landscape  in  a heavily-forested  old-growth  patch,  then 
move  to  a younger  tree  patch,  then  to  an  open  meadow.  In  the  process,  it  would  cross 
boundaries  separating  the  old-growth  from  the  younger  tree  patches  and  then  the  younger 
tree  patch  from  the  meadow.  In  this  situation,  the  deer  would  move  easier  betweem  the 
forested  patches  than  from  the  forest  to  the  meadow.  According  to  Forman  and  Godron 
(1986),  an  animal  that  encounters  more  similar  patches  has  a lower  boundary  crossing 
frequency  and  therefore  may  move  rapidly  across  the  area. 

In  determining  boundary  crossing  frequency,  it  may  be  helpful  to  consider  boundary  discrete- 
ness in  the  calculations  (Forman  and  Godron,  1986,  pg.  405).  A boundary  would  be  consid- 
ered highly  discrete  if  it  were  abrupt,  as  between  forested  and  non-forested  ecosystems. 
Conversely,  a boundary  would  be  considered  not  very  discrete  if  it  were  between  old  growth 
and  mature  forest  ecosystems. 

It  is  not  practical  to  calculate  boundary  crossing  frequency  for  all  species.  We  have  used  the 
following  approach  to  provide  a general  idea  for  the  rate  of  flow  of  materials  and  animals  across 
the  landscape: 

To  estimate  boundary  crossing  frequency  we  counted  the  number  of  patch  boundaries 
encountered  on  the  400-foot  topographic  lines  from  one  side  of  the  landscape  to  the  other 
(Table  H-4).  Patches  were  defined  by  forest  class  codes  as  either  forested  or  non-forested. 
Boundaries  crossed  were  categorized  as  either:  forested  to  forested,  forested  to  non-forested, 
or  non-forested  to  non-forested. 


H - 20 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


Table  H-4.  Boundary  Crossing  Frequency 


ELEVATION 

TYPE 

# 

6800 

F/F 

52 

6800 

F/N 

61 

6800 

N/N 

14 

TOTAL 

127 

7200 

F/F 

63 

7200 

F/N 

59 

7200 

N/N 

7 

TOTAL 

129 

7600 

F/F 

76 

7600 

F/N 

43 

7600 

N/N 

1 

TOTAL 

130 

8000 

F/F 

47 

8000 

F/N 

42 

8000 

N/N 

2 

TOTAL 

91 

8400 

F/F 

19 

8400 

F/N 

68 

8400 

N/N 

1 

TOTAL 

88 

Several  conclusions  can  be  drawn  from  the  boundary  crossing  data: 

1 . The  existing  landscape  does  not  have  very  large  continuous  patches  (tens  of  thousands 
of  acres)  of  any  one  ecosystem  type. 

2.  The  landscape  relatively  patchy,  as  indicated  by  the  number  of  boundaries. 

3.  The  landscape  is  relatively  diverse,  as  indicated  by  the  mix  of  boundary  types  (Forested/ 
Forested,  Forested/Non-forested  and  Non-Forested/Non-forested). 

After  considering  the  patch  structure,  patch  location,  patch  shape  and  other  landscape  information 
considered  above,  the  following  conclusions  were  drawn. 

1.  No  patch  is  totally  connected  to  another  patch.  Patches  14  (PP  or  PP/DF  mix,  seedlings 
and  saplings),  33  (deforested),  90  (water),  and  817  (unsuitable,  AF,  ES,  or  LP  mix,  Sawtimber, 
mature)  were  represented  by  only  one  patch  each,  which  represented  less  than  one  percent 
of  the  landscape  acreage. 


H -21 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


2.  The  non-forest  patches  represent  approximately  12  percent  of  the  landscape  and  have  a 
relatively  high  degree  of  connectiveness  particularly  at  lower  elevations.  The  open  forested 
ecosystems  represent  approximately  1 4 percent  of  the  landscape  and  also  have  a relatively 
high  degree  of  connectiveness  in  their  current  condition. 

3.  Non-forested  and  open  forested  communities  (code  40)  account  for  26  percent  of  the 
landscape  area.  These  areas  are  represented  at  all  elevation  positions  in  the  landscape. 

4.  Of  the  forested  patches,  codes  17  (six  percent),  18  (thirteen  percent),  and  19  (15  percent) 
are  moderate  to  highly  connective,  but  are  found  predominately  at  elevations  above  7,000  feet 
in  the  landscape.  The  other  forested  ecosystems  in  this  landscape  have  relatively  low  connec- 
tiveness and  are  relatively  isolated. 


H -22 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


SECTION  II.  EFFECTS  ANALYSIS  OF  PROPOSED  ALTERNATIVES 


I.  LANDSCAPE 

A.  SURROUNDING  LANDSCAPES 

1 . Adjacent  landscapes:  Conifer  forest  matrix 

a.  Heterogeneity  and  homogeneity:  to  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape 

Landscape  porosity  would  increase  by  0.9  to  2.6  percent  of  the  landscape  (depending  on  the 
alternative  selected)  with  the  addition  of  292  to  847  acres  of  openings.  This  shift  to  early  successional 
stages  would  reduce  the  average  age  of  trees  in  the  landscape.  A shift  from  environmental  openings 
to  human-caused  openings  would  occur.  Up  to  17.8  miles  of  new  roads  would  be  constructed, 
providing  corridors  that  facilitate  human  access  despite  road  closures. 

These  actions  would  cause  the  Moyer  landscape  to  become  more  similar  (homogeneous)  to  the 
Fawn  Creek,  Iron  Lake  and  Morgan  Creek  landscape  and  less  similar  to  the  Panther  Creek  landscape. 

b.  Movement  among  the  landscapes 

I.  Flow 

(a)  Wind,  water,  nutrients,  energy. 

All  of  the  proposed  action  alternatives  will  likely  increase  water  and  nutrient  flow  to  downstream 
landscapes  beginning  with  the  Panther  Landscape,  directly  west  of  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape. 
Clearcutting  and  shelterwood  cutting  on  292  to  847  acres  or  0.9-  2.6  percent  of  the  landscape 
will  increase  subsurface  and/or  surface  water  flow  because  there  are  fewer  trees  to  take  up 
the  water.  The  excess  water  is  either  taken  up  by  downhill  trees  which  may  allow  them  to  grow 
faster  or  it  will  result  in  higher  flows  or  longer  flows  of  water  in  Salt  Creek,  Woodtick  Creek  and 
Moyer  Creek,  which  flow  into  Panther  Creek. 

Some  nutrients  will  flow  downhill  from  the  newly  created  roads  and  openings,  via  surface  water 
flow. 

Timber  harvesting  can  cause  an  increase  in  the  total  water  produced  by  a drainage.  Non- 
forested  areas  can  accumulate  more  snowpack  than  adjacent  forested  lands  because  of  the 
reduced  snow  interception  by  tree  cover  and  by  redistribution  of  snow  during  storms.  Also  the 
transpiration  rate  is  decreased  when  trees  are  removed. 

The  increase  in  non-forested  or  lightly  forested  areas  generated  by  clearcutting  and  shelter- 
wood  cutting  ranges  from  292  acres  to  847  acres  or  0.9  percent  to  2.6  percent  of  the 
landscape,  depending  on  the  alternative.  The  preferred  alternative  is  815  acres  or  2 percent 
of  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape. 

The  amount  of  increase  in  water  and  nutrient  flow  is  difficult  to  measure  because  of  natural 
variability  in  water  flow.  Generally,  a significant  change  in  water  flow  does  not  occur  until  20-30 
percent  of  the  watershed  is  affected  (Troendle  and  Leaf,  1980)  [Refer  to  the  Hydrology  Effects 
section  (Chapter  IV)  for  further  information.] 


H -23 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


Of  the  three  watersheds  that  would  be  affected  by  logging,  Woodtick  Creek  would  have  a 
maximum  of  8.2  percent  disturbance;  Salt  Creek,  14.3  percent  ; and  "Perm"  Creek,  14.2 
percent.  Ail  of  these  are  below  the  20  percent  threshold  for  significant  effects  to  water  yield. 
See  Table  IV-2  for  the  percent  of  affected  land  by  watershed  by  alternative. 

(b)  Plants  In  general 

The  flow  of  plants  between  the  Moyer  Salt  Lnadscape  and  the  surrounding  landscapes  would 
not  be  effected  by  any  of  the  proposed  alternatives.  However,  as  a result  of  the  construction 
of  up  to  17.8  miles  of  new  road  and  the  reconstruction  of  up  to  9.3  miles  in  the  Moyer  Salt 
Landscape  could  create  new  corridors  that  could  facilitate  the  movement  of  plant  species, 
including  invasion  of  exotic  plant  species,  particularly  knapweed.  Knapweed  is  known  to  be 
spread  by  motorized  vehicles  and  so  could  enter  the  landscape  along  roads  from  the  north. 

In  all  alternatives  chemical  herbicides  will  be  sprayed  along  roads  annually  as  needed  to 
control  noxious  weeds. 


(c)  Animals:  birds,  mammals,  reptiles,  fish,  invertebrates 

The  flow  of  animals  between  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  landscape  and  the  surrounding 
landscapes  may  be  altered  by  this  project.  Up  to  17.8  miles  of  new  travel  corridors  will  be 
created,  facilitating  the  movement  of  some  species  including  humans.  Slash  will  be  placed  on 
some  of  the  roads  (extending  from  cutbank  to  fill  slope).  This  will  discourage  travel  by  humans 
on  foot  and  on  horseback.  Openings  will  be  left  to  allow  travel  perpendicular  to  the  road 
(including  humans).  They  may  serve  as  a filter  for  some  species. 

(d)  T&E,  Proposed  and  Sensitive  species 

TEP&S  species  are  the  species  that  are  probably  the  most  sensitive  to  landscape  alterations 
in  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  because  of  their  limited  populations.  Proposed  alterations  of  the 
landscape  could  improve  habitat,  not  effect  habitat  or  degrade  habitat  for  a particular  species 
depending  on  the  scale  and  level  of  disturbance  of  the  alteration.  Alterations  could  be  benefi- 
cial for  some  TEP&S  species  and  not  beneficial  for  other  TEP&S  species.  The  following 
discussion  of  the  effects  of  the  proposed  alternatives  is  provided  to  analyze  the  effects  of  the 
alternatives  on  potential  habitat  for  these  species. 

Anerlcan  Lynx 

New  openings  created  will  provide  an  additional  292  to  847  acres  of  new  browse  for  snowshoe 
hare,  the  main  food  source  for  American  Lynx.  The  potential  travel  routes  of  lynx  may  be  altered 
because  lynx  follow  ridges  and  saddles  when  mature  timber  is  present  and  will  usually  not 
cross  openings  of  greater  than  300  feet  (Koehler  and  Brittell  1990). 

All  of  the  openings  proposed  in  all  the  action  alternatives  are  larger  than  300  feet  across.  The 
number  of  openings  ranges  from  7 to  32  depending  on  the  alternatives.  These  clearcut  areas 
may  be  avoided  by  lynx.  Suitable  travel  corridors  are  likely  available  in  the  landscape. 

Wolverine 

Wolverine  depend  on  large,  diverse  ungulate  populations,  also  feeding  on  fruits,  marmots  and 
rodents.  Wolverines  depend  on  mature  or  intermediate  subalpine  fir  habitat,  particularly  south 
and  easterly  slopes  and  edge  ecotonal  areas  around  cliffs,  slides,  blowdowns,  basins, 
swamps  and  meadows. 


H -24 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


Wolverines  have  been  known  to  cross  clearcut  areas  but  seem  reluctant  to  do  so,  based  on 
tracks  that  showed  they  ran  or  loped  through  openings  in  a straight  line  as  opposed  to  their 
normal  meandering  movement  (Hornocker  and  Hash,  1980). 

New  roads  through  the  area  would  be  closed  to  motorized  use  after  five  years  of  the  comple- 
tion of  the  timber  sale.  This  would  limit  the  access  of  humans,  the  only  known  predator  of  the 
wolverine.  Some  human  access  may  occur  on  foot  or  horseback  on  roads  that  are  not  covered 
with  slashpiles. 

However,  the  large  home  range  of  wolverines  (up  to  150  sq.  miles),  the  low  population 
densities  and  non-selective  feeding  nature  make  it  fairly  unsusceptible  to  site-specific  disturb- 
ances, such  as  timber  sales. 


Gray  wolves 

Under  each  action  alternative  (except  Alternative  5 (helicopter))  the  proposed  new  roads, 
which  would  be  closed  after  harvest,  would  provide  a new  travel  route  form  the  Moyer  Salt 
Landscape  to  the  adjoining  landscape  to  the  north  for  cursorial  mammals  such  as  wolves.  The 
alternatives  which  leave  the  greatest  miles  of  unrestricted  travel  routes  (some  roads  will  be 
blocked  by  piles  of  slash)  would  have  the  greatest  effect  on  potential  flow  of  cursorial  mam- 
mals. 

As  a result  of  restricting  vehicle  access  on  all  proposed  newly  constructed  roads  and  restrict- 
ing human  travel  via  foot  or  horseback  by  piling  debris  on  portions  of  newly  constructed  roads, 
human  access  and  presence,  after  completion  of  proposed  sale  activities,  should  not  be 
appreciably  different  (i.e.  more)  than  the  existing  condition. 

Spotted  Frogs 

Spotted  frogs  are  an  aquatic  species.  They  likely  follow  stream  corridors.  Woodtick  Creek  is 
the  only  creek  in  the  analysis  area  that  is  likely  to  provide  habitat  for  them.  One  culvert  is 
proposed  in  Woodtick  Creek.  It  is  an  open-bottom  culvert  (similar  to  a small  bridge  that  leaves 
the  stream  bottom  intact.  This  will  likely  not  affect  the  passage  of  spotted  frogs. 

No  proposed  cutting  units  are  within  0.3  miles  of  Woodtick  Creek,  and  most  are  further  than 
0.5  miles  of  it.  This  is  far  enough  from  the  creek  that  there  should  not  be  an  increase  in  water 
temperature  since  trees  which  provide  shade  for  the  stream  will  remain. 

Potential  increase  in  seasonal  water  flow  caused  by  fewer  trees  may  be  beneficial  to  spotted 
frog  habitat  by  maintaining  cooler  water  temperatures  preferred  by  spotted  frogs. 

Birds 

Boreal  owls,  northern  three-toed  woodpeckers,  and  great  gray  owls  move  readily  in  the  spruce 
fir  life  zones.  All  of  these  species  may  use  newly  created  opening  for  foraging.  The  openings 
will  provide  edge  habitat  and  preferred  feeding  sites. 


II.  Corridors  of  adjacent  landscapes 

a.  Wind,  water,  nutrients  and  energy. 

Localized  wind  patterns  will  change  as  a result  of  new  openings  but  prevailing  winds  will 
remain  the  same.  The  openings  provide  few,  if  any  trees  to  slow  down  the  wind. 


H -25 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


Stream  flow  from  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  to  the  Panther  Landscape  will  continue  uninter- 
rupted. 

Energy  in  the  form  of  biomass  will  be  reduced  until  vegetation  is  reestablished  in  the  openings. 
This  will  occur  within  5-10  years  after  disturbance  events. 

Soil  disturbance  associated  with  timber  harvest  and  road  construction  can  also  cause  acceler- 
ated soil  erosion.  Generally,  accelerated  erosion  rates  are  highest  immediately  following 
disturbance.  The  erosion  rates  of  road  fill  slopes  will  generally  return  to  normal  levels  within 
2-3  years.  Revegetation  of  road  cut  slopes  may  take  much  longer.  Road  cut  slopes  may  not 
revegetate  completely  because  of  lack  of  topsoil,  steepness  of  slopes,  or  high  percentage  of 
bedrock. 

Mitigation  measures  listed  in  Chapter  2 should  limit  the  amount  of  erosion.  Some  erosion  will 
likely  continue  to  occur  and  some  nutrients  may  flow  out  of  the  landscape,  westward  into  the 
Panther  landscape  and  beyond  via  Panther  Creek. 

b.  Plants  in  general 

Newly  created  road  corridors  would  increase  potential  access  for  plant  seeds.  Plant  seeds  can 
be  transported  by  motorized  vehicles,  by  animals,  some  of  which  may  utilize  new  corridors  that 
facilitate  travel,  by  wind  dispersion  and  water  dispersion. 

The  introduction  of  exotic  plants  would  occur.  In  all  action  alternatives  exotic  plants  found 
along  roads  will  be  treated  with  herbicides,  (see  Table  11.8  for  approximate  acreages  to  be 
treated  for  noxious  plants). 

c.  Animals:  birds,  mammals,  reptiles,  fish,  and  Invertebrates. 

Newly  created  road  corridors  would  facilitate  movement  of  some  species  along  them  and 
create  localized  barriers  to  other  species  that  have  difficulty  crossing  them.  The  14.6  to  17.8 
miles  of  new  road  will  facilitate  human  access  even  if  roads  are  closed.  In  alternatives  2,  2A, 
4 and  6,  approximately  6.5  miles  of  roads  will  be  covered  with  slash  piles  to  discourage  human 
access.  For  a listing  of  road  miles  by  alternative,  see  Table  H - 10. 

Moyer  Creek,  Woodtick  Creek,  Salt  Creek  and  other  smaller  creeks  will  continue  to  provide 
corridors  for  aquatic  species.  Genetic  interchange  among  fish  in  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape 
can  take  place.  The  Panther  Creek  corridor  links  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  with  the  Fawn 
Creek  and  Morgan  Creek  landscapes.  The  Salmon  River  links  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  aquati- 
cally  with  the  Iron  Lake  landscape. 

d.  T&E,  Proposed  and  Sensitive  species 

See  the  above  discussion  under  Movement  among  the  Landscapes. 


< 


H - 26 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


II.  LANDSCAPE  ECOSYSTEMS  STRUCTURE:  PATCHES,  CORRIDORS,  AND  MATRIX 
A.  PATCH  ECOSYSTEMS 

1.  Patches  In  the  analysis  landscape 

Proposed  human-made  openings  for  all  alternatives  range  from  4 to  95  acres.  Of  the  18  ecosystem 
types  represented  in  the  project  landscape,  openings  would  be  created  in  7 to  9 types  depending 
on  the  alternative  selected.  For  a breakdown  of  how  much  in  each  type  will  be  converted  to  early 
successional,  stages,  see  Table  H-5  and  H-6. 


Table  H-5:  Acres  Cut  In  Each  Timber  Class  by  Alternative 


Forest 

Class 

Alt 

1 

Alt 

2 

Alt 

2A 

Alt 

3 

Alt 

4 

Alt 

5 

Alt 

6 

01 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

10 

0 

02 

0 

103 

103 

162 

138 

104 

2.3 

03 

0 

21 

21 

21 

22 

22 

22 

04 

0 

0 

0 

0 

14 

0 

14 

17 

0 

102 

85 

51 

135 

83 

200 

18 

0 

81 

78 

60 

115 

0 

127 

19 

0 

132 

132 

104 

259 

15 

159 

20 

0 

20 

18 

0 

0 

0 

24 

22 

0 

20 

18 

20 

21 

29 

106 

23 

0 

70 

62 

80 

106 

22 

106 

Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EiS 


Appendix  H 


Table  H-6:  Percentage  Total  Proposed  Harvest  in  Each  Timber  Class  by 

Alternative 


Class 

1 

2 

2A 

3 

4 

5 

6 

01 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0.3 

0 

02 

0 

1.6 

1.6 

2.6 

2.2 

1.7 

2.3 

03 

0 

1.7 

1.7 

1.7 

1.8 

22 

1.8 

04 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0.8 

0 

0.8 

17 

0 

4.4 

3.7 

2.2 

5.8 

3.6 

8.6 

18 

0 

1.7 

1.6 

1.2 

2.3 

0 

2.6 

19 

0 

2.4 

2.4 

1.9 

4.8 

0.3 

2.9 

20 

0 

6.6 

5.9 

0 

6.6 

0 

7.9 

22 

0 

3.7 

3.7 

3.7 

3.9 

5.3 

3.9 

23 

0 

6.1 

5.4 

7.0 

9.2 

2.0 

9.2 

b.  Heterogeneity  and  homogeneity  within  and  between  patches 
i.  Between  Patches 

Nearly  all  of  the  patches  surrounding  the  cut  patches  are  forested  patches  of  Douglas-fir,  mixed 
conifer  and  iodgepole  pine.  These  patches  range  from  even-age  single  species  to  multi-storied  mixed 
conifer.  Adjacent  to  cut  patches  7,  10  and  13  are  small  patches  of  low  density  forest  (type  40). 

Of  the  four  types  of  patches  created  in  the  action  alternatives,  clearcut  patches  would  form  the  most 
discrete  boundaries  with  adjacent  forested  patches.  Shelterwood  patches  would  be  less  dense  with 
more  regular  tree  spacing  than  adjacent  forested  patches.  Both  types  would  have  less  structure  than 
some  of  the  surrounding  forest  patches. 

Clearcut  with  leave  island  patches  would  be  more  similar  to  surrounding  forest  patches  by  maintain- 
ing tree  species  diversity  and  structure.  Modified  irregular  shelterwood  would  be  the  most  similar  to 
adjacent  forest  patches  because  of  irregular  patterns,  multi-storied  structures  and  tree  species 
diversity. 

Alternative  5 would  have  the  greatest  homogeneity  to  the  existing  landscape  because  it  affects  far 
fewer  acres  than  the  other  action  alternatives  (see  Table  H-7).  The  patches  created  by  Alternative  2A 
would  have  greater  homogeneity  to  the  natural  landscape  than  other  action  alternatives  because  it 
creates  a variety  of  patch  types  with  varied  structures  and  tree  species. 


H - 28 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


Table  H-7:  Acres  In  Each  Harvest  Method  by  Alternative 


TOTAL  ACREAGE  OF  CUT  PATCHES  BY  ALTERNATIVE 

ALTERNATIVES 

1 

2 

2A 

3 

4 

5 

6 

CLEARCUT  PATCHES 

0 

410 

20 

255 

645 

124 

186 

CLEARCUT  PATCHES  W/ISLANDS 

0 

0 

324 

0 

0 

0 

363 

SHELTERWOOD 

0 

158 

0 

170 

202 

168 

34 

MODIFIED  IRREGULAR  SHELTERWOOD 

0 

0 

158 

0 

0 

0 

168 

TOTAL 

0 

568 

502 

425 

847 

292 

168 

Note:  Alternative  2A  will  maintain  64  islands  of  1/2-1  acre  covering  58  total  acres.  Alternative  6 will 
have  patches  totalling  64  acres. 


Alternative  4 affects  the  largest  acreage  and  creates  the  greatest  number  of  patches.  Man-made 
patches  range  in  size  from  1 acre  to  95  acres.  Natural  patches  range  in  size  from  8 acres  to  2,545 
acres  for  forest  types  that  will  be  affected  by  this  proposal.  The  openings  created  are  within  the  size 
range  of  patches  found  in  the  natural  landscape.  Environmentally  created  patch  sizes  vary  widely. 
The  man-made  patches  proposed  are  smaller  on  average  than  those  created  by  natural  disturb- 
ances. The  following  table  displays  the  minimum  and  maximum  patch  size  of  Alternative  4 which 
affects  the  largest  acreage  and  creates  the  greatest  number  of  patches. 


Table  H-8:  Forest  Class  Size  Averages  (acres):  Exlslng  and  Proposed  Harvest 


Existing 

Proposed 

Min. 

Max. 

Mean 

Std.  Dev. 

Min. 

Max. 

Forest  Types 
Alternative  4 

2 

8 

604 

86 

104 

8 

88 

3 

8 

233 

77 

56 

22 

22 

4 

13 

326 

66 

62 

4 

10 

17 

30 

842 

212 

247 

4 

40 

18 

23 

1918 

351 

474 

3 

49 

19 

32 

2545 

389 

644 

1 

60 

20 

17 

114 

38 

30 

2 

15 

22 

25 

103 

60 

23 

21 

21 

23 

8 

285 

89 

87 

18 

42 

H - 29 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


Units  7, 1 0 & 1 3 share  partial  boundaries  with  patches  of  low  density,  forest  type  40.  Clearcut  patches 
would  be  more  homogeneous  to  the  low  density  forest  patches.  Shelterwood  patches  would  be  more 
homogeneous  in  density  to  type  40  patches  but  heterogeneous  in  pattern.  Shelterwoods  have 

regular  tree  spacing  , size  and  type. 

Alternative  6 would  also  create  patches  that  are  similar  to  the  existing  forested  landscape. 

Alternatives  2,  3 and  4 would  provide  less  homogeneity  to  surrounding  forested  landscapes  than  the 
other  alternatives  because  the  patches  created  in  these  alternatives  form  more  discrete  boundaries 
with  surrounding  forested  patches. 

Clearcuts  with  islands  (found  only  in  Alternatives  2 and  6)  would  create  clearcut  patches  Interspersed 
with  small  timbered  patches  (1/2-1  acre).  This  would  increase  heterogeneity  with  surrounding  forest- 
ed patches  and  increase  homogeneity  to  non-forested  patches  of  grasses,  forbs  and  shrubs  until 
they  revegetate  with  trees. 

Shelterwood  patches  would  increase  in  heterogeneity  to  the  surrounding  forested  landscape  but  less 
so  than  with  clearcutting  because  would  retain  1 5-50  healthy  trees  per  acre.  One  story  of  trees  would 
remain,  so  structural  diversity  would  decrease  when  compared  to  the  surrounding  forested  patches. 
Homogeneity  to  non-forested  patches  of  grasses,  forbs  and  shrubs  would  increase  but  less  so  than 
with  clearcut  patches. 


I!.  Within  patches 

Four  types  of  patches  would  potentially  be  created  in  the  landscape:  clearcut  patches,  shelterwood 
patches,  clearcuts  with  islands  and  modified  irregular  shelterwood  patches.  For  a breakdown  of 
patch  type  and  acreage  created  by  alternative,  see  Table  H-9.  Alternatives  2,3,4, & 5 would  have  two 
types  of  patches  created:  clearcut  patches  and  shelterwood  patches.  The  patches  created  in  these 
alternatives  would  be  fairly  homogeneous  (little  structure  retained).  Alternative  2A  creates  three  types 
of  patches  and  Alternative  6 creates  four  types  of  patches.  These  alternatives  provide  greater  patch 
heterogeneity  (more  structure)  because  of  the  modified  irregular  shelterwood  and  clearcut  with 
islands  patches. 


H -30 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


Table  H-9:  Acre  Harvest  from  Each  Forest  Type  by  Alternative 


Alternative 

T.  TYPE 

MIN.  CUT 

MAX.  CUT 

SUM  CUT 

% T.TYPE 
CUT 

2 

2 

5 

34 

103 

1.6 

2 

3 

21 

21 

21 

1.7 

2 

17 

6 

30 

102 

4.4 

2 

18 

2 

19 

81 

1.7 

2 

19 

1 

36 

132 

2.4 

2 

20 

2 

3 

20 

6.6 

2 

22 

20 

20 

20 

3.7 

2 

23 

5 

24 

70 

6.1 

2 

40 

1 

1 

4 

0.1 

2 

60 

4 

5 

13 

0.2 

2A 

2 

5 

34 

103 

1.6 

2A 

3 

21 

21 

21 

1.7 

2A 

17 

6 

30 

85 

3.7 

2A 

18 

2 

15 

78 

1.6 

2A 

19 

3 

36 

132 

2.4 

2A 

20 

3 

15 

18 

5.9 

2A 

22 

20 

20 

20 

3.7 

2A 

23 

5 

24 

62 

5.4 

2A 

33 

3 

2 

4 

90 

162 

2.6 

3 

3 

21 

21 

21 

1.7 

3 

17 

13 

38 

51 

2.2 

3 

18 

5 

15 

60 

1.2 

3 

19 

1 

33 

104 

1.9 

3 

20 

2 

2 

2 

0.1 

3 

22 

20 

20 

20 

3.7 

3 

23 

7 

24 

80 

7.0 

4 

2 

8 

88 

138 

2.2 

4 

3 

22 

22 

22 

1.8 

H -31 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  E1S 


Appendix  H 


Table  H-9:  Acre  Harvest  from  Each  Forest  Type  by  Alternative  (continued) 


Alternative 

T.  TYPE 

MIN.  CUT 

MAX.  CUT 

SUM  CUT 

% T.TYPE 
CUT 

4 

4 

4 

10 

14 

0.8 

4 

17 

4 

40 

135 

5.8 

4 

18 

3 

49 

115 

2.3 

4 

19 

1 

60 

259 

4.8 

4 

20 

2 

15 

20 

6.6 

4 

22 

21 

21 

21 

3.9 

4 

23 

18 

42 

106 

9.2 

5 

1 

10 

10 

10 

0.3 

5 

2 

6 

95 

104 

1.7 

5 

3 

22 

22 

22 

1.8 

5 

17 

8 

40 

83 

3.6 

5 

19 

15 

15 

15 

0.3 

5 

22 

29 

29 

29 

5.3 

5 

23 

22 

22 

22 

2.0 

6 

2 

8 

88 

146 

2.3 

6 

3 

22 

22 

22 

1.8 

6 

4 

4 

10 

14 

0.8 

6 

17 

4 

40 

200 

8.6 

6 

18 

2 

49 

127 

2.6 

6 

19 

1 

36 

159 

2.9 

6 

20 

2 

15 

24 

7.9 

6 

22 

21 

21 

21 

3.9 

6 

23 

18 

42 

106 

9.2 

**  values  less  than  2 acres  have  been  dropped. 


Note:  Islands  created  in  Alternatives  2A  & 6 are  1/2-1  acre  each  and  cover  10-  30  percent  of  the  clearcut  acreage 
shown. 

Under  the  maximum  harvest  Alternative  4,  174  acres  of  Douglas-fir  would  be  removed  out  of  12,768  acres  in  the 
landscape  or  1 .4  percent.  529  acres  of  mixed  conifer  of  12,990  acres  or  4.1  percent.  127  acres  of  the  1 ,694  acres  of 
lodgepole  pine  or  7.5  percent. 

Clearcut  patches  would  be  the  most  homogeneous  of  the  four  types  of  created  openings.  These 
openings  may  retain  a small  number  of  trees  and  snags,  but  would  convert  the  patch  to  a one-storied 
early  successional  stage  of  one  type  of  tree. 


H - 32 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


Shelterwood  patches  would  be  less  homogeneous  than  clearcut  patches  because  overstory  trees 
(1 5-50  per  acre)  would  maintain  some  structural  diversity.  The  patches  would  have  two  stories,  while 
clearcut  patches  have  one  story. 

Clearcut  patches  with  islands  would  maintain  the  species  diversity  found  in  the  surrounding  land- 
scape, by  leaving  healthy  shade-tolerant  species  (Douglas-fir,  subalpine  fir  and  Engelmann  spruce), 
individually  and  in  islands.  Islands  of  lodgepole  pine  would  be  retained  where  disease-free  trees  with 
a low  downfall  exist.  These  interior  islands  would  range  from  1/2-1  acre  in  size  covering  10-30  percent 
of  each  opening.  This  would  increase  heterogeneity  of  the  patch  by  maintaining  structural  diversity. 

Modified  irregular  shelterwood  patches  would  be  similar  in  heterogeneity  to  clearcut  patches  with 
islands,  but  would  likely  provide  the  most  structure  of  any  of  the  create  patch  types.  (Personal 
communication,  Doug  Basford)  These  patches  would  retain  two-four  storied  structure  as  well  as 
species  diversity. 

All  cut  patches  will  retain  a minimum  of  10  snags  per  10  acres  and  4 recruitment  snags  per  40  acres. 
(See  Snag  Guidelines  in  Table  11-1,  main  document).  All  proposed  cut  patches  will  leave  approxi- 
mately 15  tons/acre  of  woody  debris.  Areas  with  islands,  shelterwood  and  modified  irregular  shelter- 
wood  will  also  have  a greater  opportunity  for  snag  recruitment  than  clearcut  patches  because  they 
retain  more  standing  trees  per  acre. 

This  is  important  when  considering  old  forest  structure,  Harris  states  "The  two  habitat  elements  that 
contribute  most  to  the  habitat  value  of  older  forests  are  standing  large,  dead  trees  (snags)  and  fallen 
logs."  (Harris,  1984,  page  66). 

Forested  patches  that  have  vertical  diversity  in  the  forest  canopy  will  allow  for  better  exchange  of 
gases,  more  effective  precipitation,  greater  amounts  of  solar  radiation  to  reach  the  mid  and  under- 
story levels.  These  factors  allow  vegetation  growth  throughout  the  vertical  profile,  which  will  permit 
herbs  and  shurbs  to  grow  on  the  forest  floor  (Harris,  1984,  page  19).  This  vegetation  supports 
phytophagous  (plant-eating)  insects  which  are  a support  base  for  many  insectivorous  vertebrates. 
This  can  be  very  important  in  the  spring  and  early  summer,  because  virtually  all  forest  birds  are 
insectivorous  or  carnivorous  (Harris,  1984,  page  19).  Also,  vertical  height  distribution  of  foliage  is 
widely  accepted  as  a method  of  prediction  for  bird  species  diversity,  and  a more  complex  canopy 
structure  may  lead  to  greater  bird  abundance. 

Harris  found  that,  as  greater  foliage  height  diversity  leads  to  a greater  diversity  of  birds,  a heteroge- 
neous ground  layer  creates  better  habitat  for  cursorial  (adapted  for  running)  and  fossorial  (adapted 
for  burrowing  or  digging)  vertebrates.  The  understory  and  epiphytic  vegetation  is  an  essential 
component  of  wildlife  habitat,  especially  in  the  Douglas-fir  forests  where  diversity  of  flowering  plants 
is  low  (Harris,  1 984,  page  21).  Since  vertically  diverse  forest  canopies  provide  greater  opportunity  for 
understory  vegetation  to  grow,  flowering  plants  could  have  a greater  presence  under  the  diversified 
forest  harvesting  system  than  the  clearcutting  system.  Harris  states,  "Angispermous  (flowering) 
plants  produce  all  of  the  nectar  that  is  consumed  by  nectivores  (e.g.  hummingbirds)  and  the  majority 
of  fruits  and  seeds  (mast)  for  granivores  and  omnivores."  (Harris,  1984,  page  21). 

Below  are  listed  the  cutting  prescriptions  by  descending  order  of  height  diversity: 

Modified  irregular  shelterwood  units 
Clearcuts  with  islands 
Shelterwood 
Clearcut 

The  no  action  alternative  will  likely  maintain  the  greatest  height  diversity  of  all  the  alternatives  in  the 
short  term. 


H -33 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


Action  alternatives  which  favor  the  modified  irregular  shelterwood  and  clearcuts  with  islands  cutting 
methods  will  result  in  patches  that  provide  more  foliage  height  diversity  than  alternatives  that  favor 
clearcuts  and  shelterwoods.  Clearcutting  reduces  the  vertical  diversity  to  nearly  nil  during  early 
development. 

Of  the  major  action  alternatives,  2A  would  likely  maintain  the  greatest  height  diversity  of  the  action 
alternatives  by  cutting  382  acres  of  clearcuts  with  islands  and  158  acres  of  modified  irregular 
shelterwood  with  20  acres  of  clearcutting  in  4 patches.  Alternative  6 would  result  in  the  second 
greatest  level  of  height  diversity  of  the  major  action  alternatives. 

Alternatve  4 would  reduce  vertical  diversity  the  most  of  any  alternative  by  clearcutting  645  acres.  One 
layer  of  trees  would  be  maintained  in  202  shelterwood  acres.  Alternatives  2 and  3 are  similar  in  cutting 
method  but  affect  fewer  acres. 

Clearcuts  will  maintain  1 0 snags  per  1 0 acres  and  40  recruitment  snags  per  1 0 acres,  (see  T able  2-1 
main  document  for  snag  guidelines)  Shelterwoods  will  have  potential  for  snag  recruitment  by  retain- 
ing 1 5-50  mature  trees  per  acre.  Clearcuts  with  islands  will  allow  for  snag  recruitment,  particularly  in 
the  islands  and  also  among  the  residual  shade-tolerant  trees.  Irregular  shelterwoods  would  likely 
provide  the  best  opportunity  for  snag  recruitment  because  of  the  variety  of  species,  sizes  and 
patterns  retained. 

Alternatives  2, 3 and  4 which  are  predominately  clearcutting,  with  some  shelterwood,  (see  Table  H-7) 
would  have  the  least  potential  for  snag  recruitment  and  downed  woody  debris,  predominately  in  the 
shelterwood  patches-  Alternative  2,  1 58  acres;  Alternative  3, 1 70  acres  and  Alternative  4,  202  acres. 

Alternative  6 will  allow  for  a moderate  number  of  recruitment  snags  and  downed  logs  because  it 
creates  a variety  of  openings:  186  acres  of  clearcuts,  369  acres  of  clearcuts  with  islands,  34  acres 
of  shelterwood  and  168  acres  of  modified  irregular  shelterwoods. 

Alternative  2A  will  allow  for  more  recruitment  snags  and  downed  logs  than  most  of  the  other  action 
alternatives  (except  Alternative  5),  20  acres  of  clearcuts,  324  acres  of  clearcuts  with  islands  and  158 
acres  modified  irregular  shelterwood. 

The  potential  for  snag  recruitment  and  downed  logs  will  likely  be  highest  for  Alternative  5 because 
it  affects  the  fewest  number  of  acres  (292)  of  all  the  action  alternatives. 

c.  Boundary  shape 

The  boundary  shapes  of  the  proposed  openings  are  generally  not  similar  to  patches  found  in 
the  existing  landscape.  The  boundaries  of  the  man-made  patches  are  more  geometric  and 
form  more  discrete  boundaries  (more  distinct  edge)  than  patches  created  by  fires. 

d.  Edge  and  edge  effect 

The  edge  effect  would  be  most  pronounced  between  forested  and  non-forested  patches.  All 
of  the  proposed  cutting  areas  are  predominately  surrounded  by  forested  areas.  The  excep- 
tions are  small  portions  of  the  boundaries  of  Units  7,  10  and  13. 

The  edge  effect  would  be  greatest  in  alternatives  that  create  the  largest  number  of  clearcuts, 
particularly  those  with  islands.  Clearcuts  with  islands  will  also  create  a large  amount  of  discrete 
edge  since  the  islands  will  be  discontinuous.  This  will  create  openings  with  interspersed 
forested  patches  of  1/2  to  1 acre. 


H -34 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


The  edge  effect  will  be  less  discrete  in  shelterwood  and  modified  irregular  shelterwood  than 
in  clearcuts.  The  boundary  will  be  forested  to  forested,  with  a change  in  type  of  forest  patch. 

Alternatives  2A  will  create  the  greatest  number  of  discrete  edges  because  of  the  21  clearcut 
with  island  prescription,  spanning  324  acres,  plus  the  4 clearcuts  spanning  20  acres 

e.  Disturbance/recovery  regimes 

The  disturbance/recovery  regimes  would  vary  by  the  method  of  proposed  harvest.  The 
disturbance/recovery  process  of  clearcutting  has  some  similar  characteristics  to  a stand 
replacing  fire.  In  a stand  replacing  fire  all  the  trees  are  killed  (Fischer  and  Clayton,  1983,  page 
43).  With  the  clearcutting  harvest  method,  the  objective  is  also  to  kill  all  of  the  existing  trees 
and  then  to  reforest  the  area  with  young  healthy  trees. 

One  of  the  differences  between  the  results  of  a clearcut  and  a stand-replacing  fire  is  that  the 
logging  objective  is  to  maximize  removal  of  the  trees  to  use  for  wood  products.  In  the  fire 
situation  there  may  be  standing  dead  trees  (snags)  left  on  the  site  as  well  as  downed  logs.  In 
both  clearcutting  and  stand-replacing  fires,  the  forest  would  be  reduced  to  a regeneration 
phase  of  succession. 

More  forest  cover  would  remain  with  shelterwood  or  modified  irregular  shelterwood  cuts.  Cool 
to  moderate  understory  patchy  fires,  kill  some  trees  but  leave  the  larger  size  and  older  trees, 
and  create  openings  in  the  stand  to  allow  for  seedling  growth  (Fischer  and  Clayton,  1 983,  page 
43).  This  is  the  same  type  of  results  that  would  result  from  harvesting  with  the  irregular 
shelterwood  method  as  proposed  for  the  Douglas-fir  ecosystems  in  Alternative  2A  and  6,  an 
open-forested  or  forested  appearance  would  be  left. 

B.  CORRIDORS  ECOSYSTEMS 

1 . Stream  corridors 

a.  The  length,  width,  nodes,  heterogeneity  and  homogeneity  of  ripari- 
an strip  corridors  would  not  be  affected  by  any  of  the  proposed 
action  alternatives,  except  where  roads  cross  the  riparian  corridors. 

b.  Disturbance/recovery  regimes  of  stream  corridors: 

Roads  crossing  streams  would  be  the  only  major  disturbance  to  the  stream  corridors.  Major 
stream  crossings  includes  Goodluck  Creek,  Woodtick  Creek,  upper  and  lower  Perm  Creek  and 
lower  Salt  Creek.  Minor  Creek  crossings  include  two  forks  of  an  unnamed  tributary  of  Woodtick 
Creek. 

All  of  the  action  alternatives  would  cross  Woodtick  Creek  via  a drop  (open-bottomed)  culvert 
which  would  allow  fish  passage.  Alternative  5 would  have  one  stream  crossing  at  Woodtick 
Creek. 

All  the  action  alternatives  have  strict  mitigation  measures  to  address  disturbance/recovery  of 
riparian  corridors. 

Trees  in  the  roadways  would  not  grow  past  seedling  size.  The  road  surfaces  would  not  exceed 
18  feet  in  width,  and  trees  growing  along  the  edge  of  the  road  would  be  allowed  to  mature, 
although,  grasses  and  shrubs  would  grow  on  the  edges  of  the  roads,  and  some  grasses  in 
the  center  of  the  road. 


H - 35 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


2.  Line  corridors  (roads). 

Roads  would  be  the  only  line  corridors  created  by  the  action  alternatives.  The  heterogeneity 
of  the  roads  would  be  different  by  alternative.  The  new  roads  will  all  be  permanent  roads. 
Roads  would  be  managed  for  periodic  traffic  use  and  grass  and  forb  growth  would  be 
encouraged,  but  tree  growth  would  be  removed  from  the  road  surface.  Revegetation  would 
not  occur  on  the  planned  permanent  road  surfaces,  but  would  occur  on  fill  slopes  and  much 
of  the  cut  slopes. 


Table  H-10:  Miles  of  Road  Constructed  or  Reconstructed  by  Alternative. 


Road  Miles 

Alt.  1 

Alt.  2 

Alt.  2A 

Alt.  3 

Alt.  4 

Alt.  5 

Alt.  6 

Constructed 

0 

16.8 

16.8 

14.6 

17.8 

1.15 

17.8 

Reconstructed 

0 

1.3 

1.3 

9.3 

9.3 

8.0 

9.3 

Total 

0 

18.1 

18.1 

23.9 

27.1 

9.15 

27.1 

Road  acres 

57 

119 

119 

111 

123 

61 

123 

a.  Homogeneity  of  line  corridors 

The  homogeneity  of  roads  would  be  high.  They  would  be  primarily  unvegetated  with  some  grass  and 
forb  encroachment.  They  would  be  maintained  to  keep  trees  from  growing  in  the  travel  way. 

b.  Disturbance/recovery  regimes  of  line  corridors 

Permanent  roads  would  disturb  the  ecosystem  on  4 to  66  additional  acres.  Some  grasses  and  forbs 
would  encroach  on  the  edges  of  the  road  and  in  the  center,  but  recovery  would  be  incomplete  since 
any  trees  that  encroached  into  the  running  surface  would  be  removed.  The  last  1/2  mile  of  Road 
#60286.1  and  all  of  roads  #60286.2,  60286-C  and  60288  will  be  covered  with  slash  piles  five  years 
following  timber  removal  in  Alternatives  2,  2A,  4 and  6.  The  mileage  of  the  slash-covered  roads  totals 
approximately  6.5  miles.  These  roads  would  have  little  additional  disturbance  but  would  likely  not 
revegetate  because  of  the  density  of  slash. 


C.  MATRIX  ECOSYSTEM 

SSS.  PATCH  AND  CORRIDOR  FUNCTION  WITHIN  THE  LANDSCAPE 
A.  PATCH  ECOSYSTEM  FUNCTION 
The  matrix  would  remain  Douglas-fir  and  mixed  conifer  up  to  9 inches. 

1.  Connectiveness  of  patches 

Non-forested  or  low  density  open  forest  patches  cover  approximately  27  percent  of  the  Moyer  Salt 
Landscape.  These  range  from  closed  boundary  island  patches  at  higher  elevations  as  small  as  2 
acres  to  large  patches  up  to  2,053  acres  below  7,500  feet  and  on  south-facing  slopes. 


H - 36 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


Alternative  2A  will  create  64  patches  of  1/2  - 1 acre,  totalling  58  acres. 

Alternative  6 will  created  73  patches  of  1/2  - 1 acre,  totalling  64  acres. 

T&E,  P,  and  S as  related  to  patch  connectivity 

All  of  the  cutting  units  proposed  in  the  action  alternatives  would  result  in  decreased  connectivity  in 
forested  types.  The  effect  would  be  greatest  in  portions  of  Alternatives  2,  3,  4 and  6 where  patches 
of  habitat  would  be  clearcut  or  clearcut  leaving  discontinuous  island  patches.  Alternative  5 would  be 
the  least  disruptive  to  patch  connectivity  (of  the  action  alternatives),  because  it  affects  the  fewest 
acres. 

Gardner  et  al.  (1 987)  have  shown  that  the  threshold  for  habitat  modification  below  which  negative 
effects  to  connectivity  occur  in  a landscape  is  about  60  percent.  None  of  the  TEPS  species  which 
occur  in  the  analysis  area  are  known  to  be  dependent  on  Douglas-fir  communities.  However, 
goshawks  select  mature  to  "over-mature"  conifers  (including  Douglas-fir)  with  a closed  canopy  as 
nesting  stands  (Hayward  and  Escano  1989).  The  Biological  Evaluation  for  goshawks  (Appendix  G1) 
has  indicated  that,  while  nesting  habitat  would  be  lost  when  the  mature  Douglas-fir  units  are  harvest- 
ed, population  viability  for  this  species  on  the  Salmon  National  Forest  would  not  be  jeopardized. 


2.  Porosity  of  Ecosystems 

Porosity  related  to  genetic  variability 

Forman  and  Godron  (1 986,  pg  1 70)  have  stated  that  porosity  can  provide  an  indication  of  the  degree 
of  species  isolation  present  and  a clue  to  the  potential  genetic  variability  present  within  populations 
of  animals  and  plants  in  a landscape.  All  action  alternatives  would  increase  the  patchiness  of  the 
landscape  (Forman  and  Godron,  1986,  pg  207)  and  result  in  a more  porous  matrix  (Forman  and 
Godron,  1 986,  page  1 68).  Porosity  is  a measure  of  the  number  of  patches,  regardless  of  size.  (Forman 
and  Godron,  page  170) 

Alternative  2A  would  add  the  greatest  number  of  patches.  Thirty  two  major  patches  would  be  added 
plus  the  64  additional  patches  created  in  the  islands  for  a total  of  96  new  patches.  Alternative  6 would 
add  30  major  patches  plus  73  one-half  to  one  acre  island  patches.  Alternative  5 would  create  7 
patches,  the  fewest  number  of  patches  of  the  action  alternatives.  Alternatives  2,  3 and  4 would 
created  32,  25  and  29  patches  respectively. 

Table  H-1 1 lists  the  calculated  matrix  porosity  for  each  alternative  as  measured  by  patch  numbers. 


Table  H-1 1 : Porosity  As  Measured  by  Patch  Numbers 


Description 

Alt.  1 

Alt.  2 

Alt.  2A 

Alt.  3 

Alt.  4 

Alt.  5 

Alt.  6 

Forested 

416 

423 

423 

425 

420 

419 

420 

Non-forested 

228 

253 

253 

244 

253 

232 

254 

TOTAL  Patches 

644 

676 

676 

669 

673 

651 

674 

Note  1 : Clearcuts  were  considered  non-forested  and  shelterwoods  were  considered  forested  patch- 
es for  this  table. 


H - 37 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


Note  2:  Alternative  2A  would  create  64  island  patches  of  1/2-1  acre.  Alternative  6 would  create  73 
island  patches  of  1/2-1  acre.  These  are  not  included  in  the  above  totals. 

3.  Flow 

The  flow  that  occurs  within  and  between  landscapes  is  partially  a function  of  porosity.  The  predicted 
increase  in  porosity  (by  timber  cutting)  ranges  from  1 percent  in  Alternative  5 to  5 percent  in 
Alternatives  2,  2A  and  6. 

The  rate  of  flow  of  objects  in  and  through  a landscape,  termed  landscape  resistance,  is  partially  a 
function  of  the  boundary  crossing  frequency  (BCF)  and  boundary  discreteness  (Forman  and  Godron 
1986).  It  is  hypothesized  that  flows  of  wind,  water,  and  locomotion  are  generally  slowed  by  crossing 
boundaries.  Boundary  crossing  frequency  can  be  a general  indicator  of  landscape  resistance  (For- 
man and  Godron  1986). 

Forman  and  Godron  (1986)  suggest  that  they  expect  animals  and  plants  are  inhibited  more  by  a 
highly  discrete  (abrupt)  boundary  than  by  a gradual  boundary.  Therefore,  our  analysis  has  incorpo- 
rated boundary  discreteness  into  the  calculations  for  boundary  crossing  frequency.  Three  classes 
of  boundaries  were  considered  when  calculating  the  boundary  crossing  frequency:  forested/ 
forested,  non-forested/non-forested  and  forested/non-forested.  The  forested/forested  and  non- 
forested/non-forested  boundaries  were  considered  gradual;  forested/non-forested  boundaries  were 
considered  discrete  (abrupt). 

For  the  proposed  actions  in  this  landscape,  direct  effects  of  the  action  alternatives  are  concentrated 
between  6,800  and  8,400  feet  elevations.  Thus,  a boundary  crossing  frequency  (BCF)  analysis  was 
completed  by  counting  the  number  of  boundaries  crossed  by  each  mapped  contour  line  at  the  6800, 
7200,  7600,  8000  and  8400  foot  contours  for  each  alternative  (Table  H-12).  Road  rights-of-way  were 
not  included  in  the  count. 


H -38 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


Table  H-12:  Boundary  Crossing  Frequency  by  Alternative 


Elevation 

Bound- 

ary 

Type 

ALT  1 
(No 

Action) 

ALT  2 

ALT  2A 

ALT  3 

ALT  4 

ALT  5 

ALT  6 

6800 

F/F 

52 

52 

52 

52 

52 

52 

52 

F/N 

61 

61 

61 

61 

61 

61 

61 

N/N 

14 

14 

14 

14 

14 

14 

14 

7200 

F/F 

63 

63 

63 

63 

63 

63 

63 

F/N 

59 

67 

67 

63 

71 

67 

17 

N/N 

7 

7 

7 

7 

7 

7 

7 

7600 

F/F 

76 

76 

76 

76 

76 

76 

76 

F/N 

43 

63 

63 

20 

55 

49 

55 

N/N 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

8000 

F/F 

47 

47 

47 

47 

47 

47 

47 

F/N 

42 

52 

52 

54 

48 

42 

56 

N/N 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

8400 

F/F 

19 

19 

19 

19 

19 

19 

19 

F/N 

68 

74 

74 

72 

78 

68 

76 

N/N 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

Because  of  the  importance  of  the  effects  of  forested/non-forested  boundaries  on  the  surrounding 
ecosystem  processes,  Alternatives  4 and  6 would  have  the  greatest  effects  on  flow  between  bound- 
aries. Alternative  2 and  2A,  the  next  greatest  effect,  then  Alternative  3 and  Alternative  5 would  have 
the  least  effect  of  the  action  alternatives. 

The  mature  structure  characteristic  forest  patches  (including  old  growth)  are  the  patches  that  would 
show  the  greatest  change  in  porosity  and  edge.  This  shift  may  yield  changes  in  flow  of  species  and 
energy  across  and  between  the  patches.  The  greatest  effects  would  be  between  non-forested  and 
forested  ecosystems. 

Of  the  four  patch  types  proposed  in  the  action  alternatives,  modified  irregular  shelterwood  patches 
will  likely  retain  the  most  mature  structure  characteristic  forest  patches.  Shelterwood  patches  will 
retain  15-50  mature  trees  per  acre  but  will  not  retain  other  canopy  layers  in  the  forest.  Clearcutting 
with  island  patches  may  retain  some  mature  trees  in  the  one-half  to  one  acre  islands.  Clearcutting 
will  remove  nearly  all  mature  trees  except  those  needed  for  snags  and  snag  recruitment. 

In  some  stands,  maintaining  the  current  condition  will  maintain  the  most  mature  structure  characteris- 
tics. 

Alternatives  4 will  likely  reduce  the  mature  structure  characteristics  forest  patches  the  greatest 
because  it  uses  the  clearcut  and  shelterwood  methods  - 25  patches  totalling  645  acres  clearcut  and  4 
patches  totalling  202  acres. 


H - 39 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  ESS 


Appendix  H 


Alternatives  which  cut  fewer  acres  (Alternative  5)  or  use  mainly  the  modified  irregular  shelterwood 
method  (Alternative  2A)  would  have  less  influence  on  the  flow  of  materials,  energy  and  life  forms  than 
the  clearcul  systems  of  Alternatives  2,  3 and  4. 

Alternative  6 cuts  the  second  largest  number  of  acres  (751)  with  186  acres  of  clearcuts,  363  acres 
of  clearcuts  with  islands  (the  acreage  of  the  islands  is  not  reflected  in  the  total),  34  acres  of 
shelterwood  cuts  and  1 68  acres  of  modified  irregular  shelterwood. 

•a.  Boundary  function 

I.  Edge 

Three  boundary  function  situations  need  to  be  addressed  for  the  range  of  alternatives  presented  in 
this  EIS:  non-forested/forested  edge,  forested/forested  edge  and  no  change  in  edge  condition. 

A newly-created  edge  within  a timber  stand  (forested/non-forested  edge)  would  have  the  greatest 
effect  to  the  ecosystems  involved.  It  is  known  that  the  trees  of  a forest  influence  the  wind  and  shade 
patterns  and  thus  snow  deposits  and  plant  survival  in  an  adjacent  opening  (J.  Kimmins,  1987).  The 
amount  of  influence  depends  on  environmental  factors,  like  slope,  aspect,  elevation,  soil  type, 
vegetative  cover,  climatic  conditions  and  weather  patterns. 

Along  the  edge  of  a non-forested  area  (like  the  clearcuts  proposed  in  all  of  the  action  alternatives) 
snow  and  tree  seeds  would  accumulate,  and  a micro-climate,  moderated  in  the  following  two  ways 
by  the  adjacent  forest,  would  be  produced.  First,  a greater  accumulation  of  snow  would  occur 
because  the  trees  along  the  edge  would  produce  a “snow-fence"  effect  trapping  snow  throughout  the 
winter.  Second,  because  of  shading  and  decreased  wind,  less  evaporation  would  occur.  Both  of 
these  processes  would  tend  to  increase  the  effective  precipitation  along  the  edges  of  the  clearcuts. 
The  moderated  micro-climates,  in  conjunction  with  the  increased  seed  and  spore  accumulations, 
would  generally  result  in  more  vegetation. 

Many  life  forms  use  openings  and  edges  of  openings  in  addition  to  other  habitats  as  a "source" 
(Forman  and  Godron  1986)  for  obtaining  food.  Some  use  the  opening  only  during  specific  times 
(night,  winter,  summer,  not  during  hunting  seasons,  etc.).  Others  are  found  in  openings  and  not 
elsewhere. 

Interior  species  are  species  that  do  not  use  edge  or  openings.  An  excess  of  edge  could  likely  exclude 
interior  species  from  that  landscape.  There  are  four  mature  forest  types  present  in  the  landscape. 
These  are:  type  1 - Mature  Douglas-fir  (below  45-60  percent  slopes),  type  3 - Mature  Douglas-fir 
(above  45-60  percent  slopes),  type  17  - Mature  mixed  conifer  (below  45-60  percent  slopes)  and  21- 
Mature  todgepole. 

Of  these  four  forest  types,  timber  cutting  is  proposed  in  the  first  three  in  some  of  the  alternatives.  Ten 
acres  of  type  1 are  proposed  in  Alternative  5.  Out  of  1 6 patches  of  type  3,  totalling  1 , 1 28  acres  in  the 
existing  landscape,  timber  harvest  is  proposed  in  one  patch  (Unit  30)  in  each  of  the  action  alterna- 
tives. The  size  of  the  cut  patch  would  be  21  acres  in  Alternatives  2,  2A  and  3 and  22  acres  in 
Alternatives  4,  5 and  6.  This  patch  would  cut  the  center  portion  of  a 79  acre  mature  forest  Douglas-fir 
patch.  The  cutting  method  would  be  shelterwood  in  Alternatives  2,  3,  4 and  5 and  modified  irregular 
shelterwood  in  Alternatives  2A  and  6.  Alternatives  4,  5 and  6 would  cut  an  adjacent  22  acres  of  small 
lodgepole  pine.  Approximately  2 percent  of  the  mature  Douglas-fir  in  the  landscape  would  be  cut. 

The  largest  amount  of  mature  timber  would  be  cut  in  the  type  17  - mature  mixed  (subalpine  fir, 
engelmann  spruce  and/or  lodgepole  pine)  conifer.  There  are  1 1 patches  totalling  2,327  acres  of  this 
type  in  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape. 


H -40 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


Alternative  4 cuts  the  most  of  any  action  alternative  in  this  type.  Three  existing  landscape  patches 
would  be  affected:  a 49  acre  patch,  a 541  acre  patch  and  and  842  acre  patch.  Thirty  acres  of  the  49 
acre  patch,  77  acres  of  the  541  acre  patch  and  1 06  acres  of  the  842  acre  patch  would  be  clearcut 
in  patches  ranging  in  size  from  4 to  40  acres. 

This  would  remove  9.1  percent  of  the  mature  mixed  conifer  type  from  the  landscape.  The  effects  of 
this  are  not  known. 

Alternative  6 would  cut  8.1  percent  of  the  mature  mixed  conifer  type  from  the  landscape.  This  would 
be  primarily  in  clearcuts  with  islands  totalling  1 88  acres.  Alternatives  5 and  2A  would  cut  the  least  of 
this  type  with  3.6  percent  and  3.7  percent  respectively. 

For  acreage  information  on  the  other  alternatives,  see  Table  H-9. 

Historically,  the  disturbance  pattern  for  this  landscape  has  been  the  occurrence  of  stand  modifying 
or  stand-replacing  events  such  as  fire  or  insect  epidemics.  Fire  generally  results  in  either  a stand 
replacing  or  partial  stand  replacing  event.  The  effects  of  a stand-replacing  fire  would  have  some 
common  characteristics  of  a clearcut,  since  a stand-replacing  fire  would  set  the  stand  succession 
back  to  a grass/forb  serai  stage  and  so  would  a clearcut.  Clearcuts  with  islands  would  be  more  similar 
to  moderate  intensity  fires  because  they  leave  scattered  patches  of  live  trees.  Shelterwood  cuts  would 
be  more  similar  to  the  effects  of  lower  intensity  fires  that  retains  some  of  the  larger,  more  fire  resistant 
Douglas-fir  or  lodgepole  pine  trees  while  removing  the  smaller  Douglas-fir  and  lodgepole  pine  as  well 
as  the  less  fire-resistant  subalpine  fir  and  engelmann  spruce.  Modified  irregular  shelterwoods  would 
be  similar  to  low  intensity  fires. 

A major  determinant  in  the  amount  of  effect  an  edge  has  is  how  much  heterogeneity  exists  between 
patches.  This  is  related  to  boundary  discreteness.  A forested  to  non-forested  boundary  likely  has  the 
greatest  effect.  More  edge  effect  may  be  created  in  alternatives  employing  modified  irregular  shelter- 
wood  cutting  methods  but  the  boundaries  are  less  distinct  than  a clearcut  surrounded  by  mature 
forest. 


il.  Source  and  sink 

On  a broad  scale,  the  results  of  a source/sink  relationship  in  a landscape  can  be  seen  in  the 
productivity  levels  of  the  different  ecosystems  which  make  up  the  landscape.  For  a given  landscape, 
the  ecosystems  which  have  higher  productivity  (older  forests,  riparian  areas  and  northslope  forests) 
are  generally  the  sinks  of  energy,  materials  and  biota  (Forman  and  Godron,  1 986,  Harris,  1 984,) 

Alternative  4 and  6 have  a higher  possibility  of  effecting  the  source/sink  relationship  for  species  that 
may  be  dependent  on  mature  mixed  conifer  forest  and  mature  Douglas-fir  forests  than  the  other 
action  alternatives.  Alternative  4 cuts  22  acres  of  mature  Douglas-fir  forest  (forest  code  3)  and  225 
acres  of  mature  mixed  conifer  forest  (forest  code  17)  by  clearcut  or  shelterwood  methods.  Alternative 
6 cuts  22  acres  of  mature  Douglas-fir  forest  and  1 88  acres  of  mature  mixed  conifer  forest  using  the 
four  methods  previously  described. 

Alternative  3 cuts  the  least  mature  forest,  21  acres  of  Douglas-fir  mature  forest  and  51  acres  of  mixed 
conifer  mature  forest. 

Alternatives  2,  2A  and  5 cut  21  to  22  acres  of  Douglas-fir  and  1 02  acre,  85  acres  and  83  acres  of 
mature  mixed  conifer  forest,  respectively. 


H -41 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


b.  Energy 

Considering  the  size  and  the  spatial  representation  of  the  proposed  harvest  units,  it  is  unlikely  that 
energy  vectors  (wind,  surface  water  or  subsurface  water  flows)  would  be  affected  greatly  by  any  of 
the  proposed  action  alternatives.  Surface  and/or  sub-surface  water  flows  will  likely  increase  because 
of  increased  snow  accumulation,  particularly  in  clearcut  areas.  Additional  water  will  be  available 
below  cut  patches.  This  will  be  taken  up  by  trees  downhill  of  cut  patches,  facilitating  increased  growth 
and  vigor  or  will  reach  streams  as  subsurface  flow,  helping  to  maintain  seasonal  flow. 


C.  CORRIDOR  ECOSYSTEM  FUNCTION 
1.  Riparian  corridors 

Direct  effects  to  the  riparian  corridors  would  primarily  be  the  road  crossings  of  Woodtick,  Salt,  Perm 
and  Goodluck  creeks  with  two  minor  crossings  of  an  unnamed  tributary  of  Woodtick  Creek.  No 
cutting  units  would  be  located  within  the  75  foot  filter  strip  either  sides  of  the  creeks.  For  location  of 
cutting  units,  see  alternative  maps. 

a.  Boundary  Function 
i.  Airborne  fiows 

(a)  Energy,  nutrients,  and  materiais 

Where  the  proposed  roads  would  cross  streams,  vegetation  would  be  removed,  resulting  in  a break 
in  vegetation.  Woodtick  Creek  is  the  only  major  Creek  that  would  be  crossed.  The  vegetation  would 
be  removed  for  a width  of  approximately  30  feet  to  allow  for  drop  culvert  construction.  Any  break  in 
the  vegetative  cover  can  alter  airborne,  surface  and  soil  flows  of  an  ecosystem,  affecting  distribution 
of  energy,  nutrients,  materials,  animals  and  plants. 

The  road  crossing  of  Woodtick  Creek  would  occur  in  conifer  type  riparian  ecosystems.  These 
ecosystems  are  subject  to  a variety  of  disturbances  in  the  natural  processes.  It  has  been  found  that 
these  ecosystems  will  burn  in  the  dry  season  of  the  year.  Generally,  wet  and  moist  spruce  forest 
conditions  will  result  in  a low  fire  susceptibility  (Hansen  1988).  Ground  fires  that  smolder  and  that  have 
restricted  size  probably  occur  most  often  and  may  result  in  the  removal  of  small  groups  of  trees. 
Rarely  are  entire  stands  or  whole  drainage  bottoms  killed  by  one  fire  event  in  these  wet  ecosystems 
(Bradley  1992).  Even  though  it  does  not  occur  as  often,  fire  may  be  more  severe  in  its  effects  to  the 
wet  forest  ecosystems  because  of  higher  site  productivity  (higher  organic  build  up)  and  because 
rhizomes  and  seeds  of  undergrowth  are  vulnerable  to  the  high  temperatures  of  smoldering  fires  in 
heavy  organic  material  (Bradley  1 992).  Spruce  trees  themselves  have  a low  resistance  to  fire  because 
of  their  dead,  dry,  flammable  lower  limbs,  low  growing  canopy  and  thin  bark  (Hansen  1988).  Bradley 
(1 992)  states,  "Englemann  and  blue  spruce  are  shallow  rooted  trees,  and  even  low  fires  may  kill  trees 
outright  or  weaken  roots  and  make  trees  susceptible  to  later  windfall.  Unusually  hot,  windy  weather 
may  reduce  fuel  moistures  enough  to  sustain  a severe  fire.  At  all  stages  the  site  will  then  return  to 
a treeless  condition"  (Bradley  1992).  Considering  the  vulnerability  of  these  ecosystems  to  fire  and 
other  disturbance  agents,  it  is  probable  that  species  occurring  in  coniferous  forest  riparian  communi- 
ties in  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  are  adapted  to  vegetative  and  soil  disturbances  that  are  larger  than 
the  proposed  road  crossings. 


(b).  T&E,  P,  and  S 

Riparian  corridors  (riparian  zone  and  adjacent  meadows)  are  important  as  foraging  areas  for  western 
big  eared  bats,  great  gray  owls  and  goshawks  and  as  such  serve  as  pathways  for  the  movement  of 


H - 42 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


these  airborne  species.  The  road  systems  proposed  in  all  of  the  action  alternatives  would  cross 
several  riparian  corridors.  Alternative  5 would  cross  one  riparian  corridor  and  the  other  action 
alternatives  would  cross  five.  It  is  not  known  if  or  how  riparian  corridor  crossings  would  affect 
potentially  occurring  T&EPS  species  in  the  landscape.  However,  a small  reduction  in  foraging  habitat 
would  occur  since  small  areas  of  riparian  habitat  would  be  covered  by  road  surface. 

II.  Overland  flows 

(a)  Energy,  nutrients,  and  materials 

Some  stream  corridors  would  be  crossed  by  roads,  resulting  in  small  amounts  of  sediment  (nutrients 
and  overland  water  flows)  reaching  the  stream  until  the  disturbed  soil  stabilizes  in  approximately  two 
years  (personal  communication,  Betsy  Rieffenberger,  Feb.  26,  1993).  (Also  see  Water  resource 
analysis,  Ch.  IV.) 

It  does  not  appear  that  the  alternatives  would  affect  the  wind  relationships  in  the  riparian  corridors. 

As  with  airborne  flows  of  vertebrates  and  invertebrates,  the  effect  on  the  movement  of  species 
probably  is  related  to  the  size  of  the  home  range  of  the  animal  concerned  and  how  adapted  to 
crossing  diverse  habitats  it  is.  Animals  with  comparatively  small  home  ranges  or  which  are  restricted 
to  one  habitat  type  would  be  most  affected.  Those  that  have  home  ranges  larger  than  the  width  of 
the  road  disturbance  and  could  use  disparate  habitats  would  be  little  affected  by  roads  crossing 
riparian  areas.  Presently,  there  are  no  data  to  suggest  that  genetic  isolation  of  species  which  inhabit 
landscapes  like  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape  would  occur  as  a result  of  road  crossings  of  this  size  of 
riparian  areas. 


(b).  T&E,  P,  and  S 

Cursorial  animals  like  wolves  and  lynx  use  riparian  corridors  to  move  between  suitable  habitat 
patches  as  well  as  for  foraging.  In  addition,  spotted  frogs  are  tied  to  riparian  corridors  throughout 
most  of  the  year.  All  of  the  action  alternatives  would  result  in  at  least  one  riparian  corridor  crossing. 
The  other  action  alternatives  will  have  five  riparian  crossings.  All  of  the  newly  constructed  roads  will 
be  gated  and  vehicle  access  by  the  general  public  will  be  restricted. 

If  vehicle  access  were  unrestricted,  we  could  expect  that  the  increase  in  human  activity  at  riparian 
corridor  crossings  could  alter  both  the  use  of  these  travel  corridors  and  the  mortality  of  wolves, 
wolverines  and  lynx  since  all  are  known  to  be  sensitive  to  human  pressure  or  are  harvested  species 
(Hornocker  and  Hash  1981;  Mech  et  al.  1988;  Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game  1992).  However, 
since  there  will  be  restrictions  on  access,  we  expect  the  effects  to  be  lessened  to  wolves,  wolverines 
and  lynx. 

The  effect,  if  any,  of  riparian  corridor  crossings  on  spotted  frogs  is  not  known.  The  Biological 
Evaluation  for  these  species  (Appendix  E)  has  indicated  that  their  viability  would  not  be  jeopardized 
by  these  proposals. 


iii.  Soil  flows 

The  action  alternatives  would  only  affect  soil  flows  at  the  riparian  corridor  crossings.  Mitigation 
measures  which  apply  to  all  action  alternatives  would  greatly  reduce  any  soil  movement  at  these 
locations. 


H -43 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


Iv.  Aquatic 

For  all  of  the  action  alternatives  except  Alternative  3,  mitigation  measures  associated  with  the 
proposed  stream  crossings  of  affected  creeks  are  designed  to  continuously  maintain  migration 
opportunity  for  ail  species  of  fish  (including  TEP&S)  currently  or  potentially  using  project  area  waters. 
Alternative  3 could  result  in  degraded  fish  habitat  as  a result  of  the  proposed  road  location  and  the 
Salt  Creek  crossing. 

For  Alternatives  1,  2,-2A,  4,  5,  and  6,  no  shifts  or  change  in  fish  species  distributions  or  population 
numbers  would  be  expected  as  a direct,  indirect,  or  cumulative  result  of  proposed  vegetation 
management  activities.  All  opportunities  currently  available  to  promote  the  genetic  variability  of 
resident  fish  stocks  within  Woodtick,  Salt  and  Perm  Creek  drainages  would  be  maintained  during  and 
after  implementation  of  proposed  activities. 

b.  Source  and  sink 

Due  to  the  limited  scale  of  the  disturbance  to  riparian  corridors  that  would  occur  from  any  of  the  action 
alternatives,  there  would  be  no  noticeable  effects  to  the  source/sink  function  of  the  riparian  corridors 
of  this  landscape. 

2.  Non-Riparian  Corridors 

a.  Strips  Corridors 

i.  Barrier/filter: 

(a)  T&E,  Proposed  and  Sensitive 

Of  the  T&EPS  species  that  occur  in  the  analysis  landscape  only  the  goshawk  is  dependant  on  old 
growth  habitat.  Most  other  listed  species  either  use  other  habitats  or  their  life  histories  are  so  poorly 
known  that  it  is  not  possible  to  predict  what  habitats  are  barriers  or  filters  for  them. 

The  timber  harvest  practices  proposed  in  all  of  the  action  alternatives  would  convert  some  habitat 
which  is  currently  available  for  nesting  by  goshawks  to  areas  that  could  only  be  used  by  them  for 
foraging.  The  irregular  shelterwood  harvesting  practices  proposed  in  Alternatives  2A  and  6 would 
retain  some  old  growth  character  in  the  cutting  units  although  the  volume  cut  would  vary  with 
alternative.  But,  the  resulting  stands  probably  would  be  unsuitable  for  nesting  by  goshawks  (Crocker- 
Bedford  1990).  It  is  not  known  how  the  habitat  changes  associated  with  this  harvest  method  would 
affect  use  of  the  areas  by  goshawks  for  foraging  or  other  T&EPS  species. 

b.  Lines  Corridors 

The  only  line  corridors  that  would  be  created  by  the  proposed  timber  sale  are  roads.  The  roads 
proposed  in  the  action  alternatives  would  be  used  by  some  animals  as  travel  routes  to  move  across 
the  landscape.  Roads  would  also  be  used  by  humans  for  vehicle  and  foot  travel  (except  for  the  6.5 
miles  that  would  be  covered  with  slash  in  Alternatives  2,  2A,  4 and  6).  Given  the  dense  nature  of  the 
forested  north  sloped  ecosystems  within  the  landscape,  roads  could  make  available  ecosystems  or 
portions  of  the  landscape  that  were  not  available  in  the  existing  landscape. 

In  addition,  roads  would  become  invasion  routes  for  some  pioneer  and  some  exotic  plant  species, 
and  some  plant  seeds  could  be  carried  along  the  roads  by  animals,  humans  or  vehicles. 


H -44 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Appendix  H 


I.  Barrier/filter 

(a)  General  animals  and  plants 

The  disturbance  associated  with  the  road  (clearing  of  vegetation,  cut  and  fill  slopes)  may  function  as 
a barrier  to  animals  or  plants  with  home  ranges  that  are  smaller  than  the  road  width  or  that  are  not 
adapted  to  crossing  disparate  habitats. 

Although  isolation  of  a population  could  result  from  barriers  and  is  a concern  for  genetic  diversity. 
Allendorf  found  that  the  genetic  flow  process  was  not  as  fragile  as  some  may  have  believed,  he  states 
that  low  amounts  of  exchange  (approximately  one  individual  per  generation)  will  maintain  the 
presents  of  the  same  alleles  in  all  demes,  that  is  qualitative  similarity  among  demes,  but  much  larger 
amounts  of  exchange  are  required  to  maintain  quantitative  similarity  among  demes  (F.  Allendorf, 
1983,  page  55,  64). 

Two  to  seven  years  after  construction  of  the  roads  proposed  in  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape,  most  of 
the  fill  slopes  would  be  revegetated  and,  depending  on  the  steepness  of  the  terrain,  so  would  the 
cut  slopes  (when  not  prohibited  by  rock).  Once  the  cut  and  fill  slopes  are  revegetated,  only  the 
running  surface  of  a road  that  receives  unrestricted  and  moderate  to  heavy  use  would  be  totally 
absent  of  vegetative  cover.  For  the  roads  being  considered,  the  running  surface  would  be  approxi- 
mately 14  feet  in  width.  It  should  also  be  considered  that  much  of  the  year  these  roads  would  have 
a complete  covering  of  snow,  which  can  assist  small  animals  to  move  beneath  the  snow  surface, 
visually  undetected  by  predators. 

Even  small  vertebrates  (mice,  voles  and  shrews)  have  home  ranges  which  exceed  the  considered 
road  width  of  14  feet.  For  example,  Harris  (1984)  who  summarized  data  collected  from  other  parts 
of  the  United  States  found  that  the  white-footed  vole,  deer  mouse,  and  the  Pacific  jumping  mouse 
all  have  home  ranges  of  approximately  80  feet  in  diameter.  He  further  indicates  the  northern  flying 
squirrel,  dusky  shrew,  and  the  mantled  ground  squirrel  have  home  ranges  of  approximately  200  feet. 

Species  that  have  home  ranges  larger  than  the  road  disturbance  areas  or  that  are  adapted  to  cross 
inhospitable  habitats  probably  would  not  be  affected.  Road  crossings  would  be  engineered  so  that 
they  are  not  barriers  to  aquatic  species. 

Therefore,  roads  would  not  be  expected  to  be  barriers  to  species  in  the  Moyer  Salt  Landscape. 

(b)  Aquatic 

See  the  discussion  above  under  Aquatic. 

(c)  T&E,  Proposed  and  Sensitive,  MIS 

The  only  line  corridors  that  would  result  in  the  analysis  area  from  the  proposed  alternatives  are  roads. 
Several  potential  barriers  could  be  created  by  the  road  systems  proposed  in  the  alternatives,  as  well. 
Wolves,  wolverines  and  lynx  are  sensitive  to  human  activity  or  are  harvested  species  (Hornocker  and 
Hash  1981;  Mech  et  al.  1988;  Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game  1992).  The  presence  of  roads, 
especially  in  riparian  areas,  could  act  as  a barrier  to  these  species.  However,  since  the  roads  would 
not  be  left  open  year  round  to  the  public,  it  is  less  likely  that  the  roads  would  function  as  barriers  to 
the  movements  of  cursorial  T&EPS  species.  Other  TEPS  species  either  do  not  use  the  habitats  (or 
elevations)  in  which  these  proposed  activities  are  located  or  are  not  known  to  avoid  roads. 


H -45 


*U.S.  GOVERNMENT  PRINTING  OFFICE:  1993-774-074/88006 


. 

' 


■ 


1022331216 


NATIONAL  AGRICULTURAL  LIBRARY 


Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Final  EIS 


Chapter  VI  - Supplement 


a T D 1 9 4 
. 56 

. I 2 2 S 3 4 
1993 
v . 2 


Chapter  VI 
Supplement 

Public  Comment  Letters 
and  Forest  Service  Responses 


MOYER  SALT 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 1 

Comments  on  Hoyer  Salt  DEIS 
by 

Hadley  Roberts 

(oral  comments  taken  on  6/29/92  by  Lynn  Bennett) 


Hap  Is  poor  scale.  Too  small  to  locate  information.  Heed  land  marks 
see  where  units  are.  Good  to  use  ortho  phot  in  map  with  units  in  map 
pocke  t . 


to 


Figures  in  Table  4-10  on  page  4-42  did  not  gee  in  proper  column.  Alt.l 
no  action  and  should  not  have  road  cost.  Hove  all  figures  to  the  right 
under  alternative  2,  3,  4,. 


is 


Page  2-13  for  alt.  4 roads  says  9.3 
Summary  page  10  for  roads  states  8.0 


Hr.  John  Burns,  Forest 
Salmon  Rational  Forest 
Box  729 

Salmon,  Idaho  83467 


*i0  o Art”"  O A u g u s t 

SUP. 

l UP  1 2 3 * 5 8 

S u p e r v i s7Af  j 2 3 * S * 

[111  1 ? 3 « S s 

rrwH  j 2 a « s » 

CClTCt 


3, 


1992 


Dear  John , 


I have  reviewed  the  Draft  Environmental  Impact  Statement  for 
the  proposed  Hoyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  and  wish  to  make  the  following 
comments  and  suggestions:- 

During  the  early  1980's,  I inventoried  all  of  the  Fey  Elk 
Summer  Range  on  the  Salmon  National  Forest,  which  I defined  as 
"areas  that  represent  the  most  ideal  habitat  and  will  support  a 
significantly  higher  density  of  animals  than  surrounding  habitat." 
I inventoried  270,500  acres  on  the  SNF  in  varying  sized  blocks. 

One  of  these  was  the  Moyer  Peak  area  (approximately  3200  acres) 
which  serves  as  a critical  security  and  hiding  cover  area. 


( la  Elk  Habitat  Relationships  for  Central  Idaho  it  says 
"Timber  harvest  on  key  elk  habitats  should  be  limited  to  those 
activities  that  will  maintain  or  enhance  the  habitat  for  that 
particular  use."  For  this  reason,  I feel  the  Moyer  Peak  FESF 
'hnuld  be  left  for  this  purpose  and  inmoved  from  the  timber  bast 


SALE 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


United  States 
Department  of 
Agriculture 


Forest 

Service 


Salmon 

National 

Forest 


P.O.  Box  729 
Salmon.  ID  83467 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date  : 


Hadley  Roberts 
708  Lombard  Street 
Salmon,  ID  83467 


Dear  Hadley: 

Thank  you  for  your  oral  comments  of  June  29.  1992,  and  written  corments  of 
August  3,  1992, on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale.  Your  comments  are  an  important 
part  of  the  environmental  analysis  process  and  have  been  reviewed  and 
discussed  by  our  team  of  resource  specialists.  Their  ideas  are  the  basis  for 
our  response  to  your  concerns  and  comprise  the  rest  of  this  letter. 

Before  answering  the  concerns  expressed  in  your  letter,  we  will  addresB  the 
the  oral  ccirments  you  shared  with  us  on  June  29,  1992.  These  were  very 
helpful  to  us  in  preparing  the  Final  Environmental  Impact  Statement  (EIS) . 

ORAL  COMMENTS  ON  CORRECTIONS  TO  THE  DRAFT 

We  have  improved  all  the  map6  in  the  Final  EIS  but  have  not  used  orthophotos 
because  they  do  not  reproduce  well  especially  at  the  reduced  scale  required 
for  this  publication.  Orthophoto  coverage,  however,  is  available  for  your 
review  at  the  Salmon  National  Forest  Headquarters. 

The  road  co6t  figures  in  Table  4-10  were  incorrectly  shown  and  have  been 
corrected  in  the  Final  EIS. 

The  reconstructed  road  miles  for  Alternative  4 i6  correct  (9.3  mile6)  on 
page  2-13.  but  was  incorrect  in  the  Summary.  The  summary  figure  has  been 
corrected  to  9.3  miles. 


WRITTEN  COMMENTS 

1 . INCONSISTENCY  WITH  FOREST  SERVICE  POLIO’  REGARDING  CUTTING  TIMBER 
IN  KESR 

The  document,  "Elk  Habitat  Relationships  for  Central  Idaho" , contains  good 
information  concerning  management  of  elk  habitat.  Portions  of  this  document 
were  adopted  in  the  Forest  Plan.  These  management  standards  and  guidelines 
help  accomplish  specific  goals  in  areas  that  received  "Key  Elk"  (4A  or  4B) 
management  prescriptions  in  the  Forest  Plan. 


Caring  (or  (he  Land  end  Serving  People 


MOYER 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 1 


Tvo  of  your  proposed  alternatives  (2  and  4)  for  the  Moyer 
Salt  Timber  Sale  will  bisect  the  KESR  with  a road  and  will  hove 
clearcut  units  in  its  center.  Needless  to  say,  this  will  severely 
reduce  the  elk  habitat  effectiveness  for  this  block  of  land. 

In  »y  view,  the  only  viable  alternative  for  this  timber  sale 
is  Alternative  3 which  avoids  roading  and  logging  this  critical 
tract  of  wildlife  habitat  yet  still  makes  available  some  timber 
from  the  surrounding  area  (mapped  os  poor  productivity  on  the  SNF 
Timber  Growth  Potential  mop).  Table  4-10  (p.  4-42)  also  shows 
that  when  comparing  economic  efficiency,  Alternative  3 has  the 
most  favorable  Present  Net  Value.  I feel  it  is  an  acceptable 
compromise  which  both  wildlife  and  timber  interests  can  support. 


In  a recent  Forest  Service  end  Rocky  Mountain  Elk  Foundation 
brochure  America ' s Elk  Count  r y . it  says  "As  the  land  management 
agency  responsible  for  roost  of  the  occupied  elk  habitat  in  the 
continental  United  States,  the  Forest  Service  will  play  the 
definitive  role  in  establishing  a future  for  wild,  free-ranging 
elk  on  public  lands."  By  preserving  these  3200  acres  of  KESR,  you 
can  play  a definite  positive  role  for  elk.  Selecting  either 
Alternative  2 or  4 will  be  a serious  reduction  of  optimum  habitat 
on  the  Forest  . 

Que  st ions  : - 

On  Summary-20  end  also  on  p.  4-7,  it  indicates  a minimal 
acres  of  wetlands  will  be  affected.  Are  any  wetlands  associated 
with  elk  wallow  complexes?  How  much?  What  type  of  mitigation 
measures  will  be  implemented,  if  any? 

On  Summary-8,  it  says  "Most  of  the  shel terwood  units  would  be 
logged  used  tractor  skidding  methods,  with  a cable  system  used  on 
slopes  greater  than  45  degrees.”  Shouldn't  this  read  "45 
percent"?  It  could  be  interpreted  to  mean  that  cats  would  be  used 
on  slopes  up  to  100X.  I don't  think  you  mean  that! 

, On  p.  2-27  (Table  2-2)  it  shows  the  acres  of  roadless  area 

remaining  as  the  same  (53,300  acres)  for  all  action  alternatives. 
With  different  amounts  of  area  being  impacted  by  each  alternative, 
it  appears  these  numbers  should  be  different.  Please  explain? 

On  p.  2-29  it  shows  "no  improvement"  for  TAE  habitat  (barrier 
to  chinook  salmon  migration  on  Woodtick  Creek)  in  Alternative  1. 
Why  wouldn't  or  couldn't  this  also  be  accomplished  under  a No 
Action  alternative.  This  sounds  like  8 backdoor  way  of  justifying 
one  of  the  action  alternatives!  Please  explain? 


SALE 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


Hadley  Roberts 


Our  particular  timber  sale,  however,  contains  cutting  units  within  areas  that 
received  3A  anadromous  fish  habitat  prescriptions  and  5A,  5B  and  5C  timber 
management  prescriptions  in  the  Forest  Plan,  rather  than  the  "Key  Elk" 
prescriptions.  Any  selected  action  alternative,  however,  would  meet  Forest 
Plan  Wildlife  Standards  and  Guidelines  for  wildlife  prescr ipt i ons 


2 . REMOVAL  OF  KESR  FP.OM  THE  TIM3EP.  BASE 


During  the  Forest  planning  process,  all  areas  of  key  elk  summer  ranoe  on  this 
Forest  were  mapped.  A portion  of  these  areas  were  then  selected  to  receive 
a 4P  Management  Area  Prescription  which  places  management  empha6i6  first  and 
foremost  on  elk  habitat  objectives.  The  amount  of  acres  given  the  4E 
prescription  was  sufficiently  large  to  provide  necessary  core  areas  for  elk 
which,  in  combination  with  surrounding  areas,  would  support  target  population 
established  in  the  Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game  Species  Management  Flan 
for  elk. 

3 . MAINTAIN  WILDLIFE  HABITAT 


As  explained  in  the  DEIS,  all  action  alternatives  propose  timber  harvest 
activities  in  various  portions  of  key  elk  summer  range  (KESP.)  . The  current 
or  natural  elk  habitat  potential  (EHP)  in  the  lower  elevation  pcrticr.  cf  this 
area.  Wildlife  Area  I,  is  approximately  67  percent  and  in  the  upper  elevation 
portion.  Wildlife  Area  II,  it  is  67  percent.  The  various  proposed  action 
alternatives  would  reduce  EHP  in  Area  I to  a low  of  approximately  46  percent 
under  Alternative  4 and  increase  EHP  to  a high  of  approximately  92  percent, 
also  under  Alternative  4 Consequently,  the  net  effect  on  EHP  in  the 
analysis  area  will  be  nearly  neutral  in  the  short  term  and  in  the  KESR  it 
will  be  positive. 

The  Moyer  Peak  KESR,  as  mapped,  is  currently  forage  limiting  with  * cover  to 
forage  ratio  of  60:2C  and  an  elk  habitat  potential  cr  effectiveness  rating 
of  87  percent.  All  action  alternatives  will  remove  some  cover  from  this  area 
thus  improving  the  cover  to  forage  ratio  and  the  corresponding  elk  habitat 
potential . 

4 PNV  COSTS 

Since  the  Draft  EIS,  we  have  analyzed  three  additional  alternatives 
Alternative  6 now  is  the  most  economically  efficient  ae  determined  by  the 
calculation  of  present  net  value  (PNV) . (See  Final  EIS.)  Due  to  the 
variables  involved  in  performing  economic  analysis  that  cover  long  periods  of 
time  (in  this  case  up  to  120  years),  the  differences  in  PNV  between  the 
alternatives  are  relatively  insignificant.  It  is  interesting  to  note  that 
alternatives  with  the  same  mix  of  silvicultural  prescriptions  will  show  an 
increasingly  negative  PNV  with  an  increase  in  acres  when  stumpaoe  rates  are 
somewhere  below  SlOO/rrbf  (such  as  those  used  to  calculate  the  long-term 
average) . On  the  other  hand  a very  slight  increase  in  6tumpage  rate6,  for 
example  close  to  or  a little  over  SlOO/mbf  will  show  the  opposite.  That  i6, 
with  an  increase  in  acres  the  PNV  will  be  increasingly  positive.  Therefore 
given  the  likelihood  of  a reduced  national  timber  supply  and  increased 
stumpage  values  it  i6  likely  that  alternatives  which  harvest  the  most  acres 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 1 


9 


Vh  n t is  the  breakdown  of  the  415  acres  of  wetlands  mentioned 
on  p.  3-6?  How  mn  n y acres  of  riparian  stringer  wetlands,  isolated 
wetlands  and  wet  meadows? 


10 


I,  the  an  p on  p.  3-27  correct?  The  roadless  area  boundary 
appears  to  be  in  error?  Spelling  - "ana, Isis  area  . 


11 


There  appears  to  be  an  error  in  Table  4-10  (p.  4-42).  It 
ahowa  roads  costs  in  Alternative  1 and  none  in  Alternative  . 


On  p.  4-43.  under  "Probable  Environmental  Effects  That 
19  Be  Avoided"  it  says  "Fall  logging  operations  could  d.scourage  the 
use  of  the  area  by  big  game  hunters.'  If  this  is  truly  a key 

issue,  have  you  considered  limiting  logging  to  before  and  after 

the  big  game  seasons? 

1 o How  many  miles  of  road  are  in  Alternative  4?  On  p.  2-13  it 

° says  9.3  miles;  on  S-10  it  says  B.O  miles. 


14 


Are  28  pages  of  computer  printouts  on  smoke  estimation  rcnlly 
necessary  in  this  document?  This  could  have  easily  been 
summarized  on  one  page  or  less  and  the  Forest  Service  could  have 
saved ■ severe  1 reams  of  paper. 


Recommendati ons  : - 


1C  On  P.  2-19  it  says  "The  existing  Moyer  Peak  jeep  trail  (Trail 

16202)  would  be  closed  and  the  road  surface  revegetated  to  reduce 
post-sale  road  density  to  0.5  mi./sq.  mi  or  less  nod  to  prevent 
access  onto  the  new  closed  road  system.’  1 completely  support 
this  mitigation  measure.  To  be  specific.  I suggest  that  you  close 
the  trail  some  place  in  Section  15  to  be  most  effective. 


16 


On  p 4-38  you  state  "New  roads  allow  cattle  to  travel  into 
areas  not  previously  utilized."  This  is  especially  ‘mportnnt  on 
this  kESR.  Cows  presently  use  the  area  in  low  numbers,  with  no 
apparent  conflicts  with  elk.  However,  if  large  numbers  find  the.r 
way  into  this  area  from  other  allotments,  a livestock/elk  conflict 
could  develop.  Therefore,  it  is  important  that  cattleguards  and 
fences  be  constructed  at  strategic  points  to  head  this  problem  off 
before  it  develops. 


Summa  r v : - 


As  I have  already  stated.  Alternative  3 is  the  only 
acceptable  alternative  for  this  timber  sale  if  you  are  to  give  any 
consideration  to  elk  on  this  key  piece  of  habitat.  To  do  anything 
less  will  be  a guaranteed  wildlife  disaster.  Here  is  a good  plnce 
to  demonstrate  what  the  Forest  Service  means  by  Total  Quality 
Management  . 


Sincerely  , 


HADLEY  B.  ROBERTS 


SALE 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


Hadley  Roberts 


will  eventually  have  the  highest  PNV.  We  will,  however,  consider  FNV  along 
with  all  the  factors  and  resources  before  choosing  the  final  course  of 
action. 


5 .  ELK  WALLOWS 

Some  of  the  isolated  wetlands  are  associated  with  elk  wallows.  The  only  ones 
that  will  be  impacted  are  those  that  the  road  will  cross.  Wet  areas  within 
proposed  cutting  units  25  and  S14  will  be  flagged  so  that  surface  disturbance 
of  these  wet  areas  will  be  avoided.  (See  Chapter  II,  Wetlands  Mitigation  in 
the  FEIS.)  Elk  wallow  complexes  are  numerous  in  the  analysis  area  and  are 
not  considered  to  be  a limiting  factor  for  elk  habitat 


6 .  CORRECTIONS 


Summary- 8 has  been  changed  for  the  Final  EIS,  to  read  "Most  of  the 
shelterwood  unit6  would  be  logged  using  tractor  skidding  methods,  with  a 
cable  system  used  on  slopes  greater  than  45  percent." 


7 .  ROADLESS  ACREAGE 


The  table  that  indicates  roadless  acres  affected  (pg  2-27  in  the  PEIS) 
includes  acres  that  are  both  directly  and  indirectly  affected  by  the  action 
alternatives.  (See  discussion  on  page  4-31  of  the  DEIS.)  Although  the  number 
of  acres  directly  affected  by  timber  harvest  and  road  construction  does  vary 
by  alternative,  the  same  general  area  is  entered  and  the  same  acres  that  are 
indirectly  affected  are  cut  off  from  the  remainder  of  the  roadless  area  in 
each  action  alternative  except  Alternative  5. 

The  map  shown  on  page  3-27  in  the  DEIS  was  in  error  and  has  been  corrected  in 
the  FEIS. 


8 . FISH  BARP.IEP.  ON  WQQDTICK  CREEK 

You  are  correct  that  the  DEIS  addressed  replacement  or  repair  of  the  existing 
Koodtick  Creek  culvert  only  within  the  context  of  the  proposed  Moyer  Salt 
timber  sale  package.  In  the  FEIS,  we  have  included  that  restoration  of  fish 
passage  at  thi6  site  could  also  be  accomplished,  with  the  No  Action 
Alternative,  through  the  Forest's  Fisheries  Program.  However,  the  timetable 
for  implementation  under  this  funding  mechanism  would  be  contingent  upon  the 
project's  level  of  priority  relative  to  other  identified  Forest  fisheries 
restoration  projects  on  the  Cobalt  Ranger  District. 

At  thi6  time,  the  Forest's  Fisheries  Program  is  currently  assigning  highest 
priority  to  projects  directed  toward  the  restoration  or  enhancement  of 
Federally  Threatened  Snake  River  spring/summer  Chinook  salmon  habitats. 
Although  the  Woodtick  Creek  drainage  possesses  habitat  for  steelhead  trout, 
no  Chinook  salmon  habitat  capability  is  indicated  for  thi6  stream  (s«»e  DEIS, 
pg  3-7;  3-36);  nor  is  there  any  evidence  of  historic  use  of  thi6  stream  by 
Chinook  salmon. 


Carina  (or  (he  Land  and  Serving  People 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 1 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


Hadley  Roberts 


4 


9 . WETLAND  TYFES 

Mo  reference  to  415  acres  of  wetlands  can  be  found  on  pages  3-6  of  the  DEIS. 
Thirty  mile6  of  riparian  stringer  wetlands,  15  acres  of  isolated  wetlands 
and  14  acres  of  wet  meadow  were  found  in  the  analysis  area.  See  the  Wetland 
section  of  Chapter  III  in  the  FEIS  for  further  information. 

10  . POADLESS  ACREAGE 

The  table  that  indicates  roadless  acres  affected  (pg  2-27  in  the  DEIS) 
includes  acres  that  are  both  directly  and  indirectly  affected  by  the  action 
alternatives.  (See  discussion  on  page  4-31  of  the  DEIS.)  Although  the 
number  of  acres  directly  affected  by  timber  har-vest  and  road  construction 
does  vary  by  alternative,  the  same  general  area  is  entered  and  the  same  a'-ier- 
that  are  indirectly  affected  are  cut  off  from  the  remainder  of  the  roadless 
area  in  each  action  alternative  except  Alternative  5. 

The  map  shown  on  page  3-27  in  the  DEIS  was  in  error  and  has  been  corrected  i r. 


11 . ROAD  COSTS  - TABLE 

The  road  cost  figures  in  Table  4-10  were  incorrectly  shown  and  have  been 
corrected  in  the  Final  EIS. 

12 . LIMITED  LOGGING  OUTSIDE  BIG  GAME  SEASONS 

The  issue  of  seasonal  logging  restrictions  to  avoid  logging  activity 
disturbance  to  both  wildlife  and  recreationists  during  the  big  game  hunting 
season  have  been  considered  by  the  ID  Team.  Tc  address  this  and  ether 
concerns,  the  proposed  activity  areas  were  divided  into  three  subdivisions 
and  logging/road  building  would  not  occur  simultaneously  within  these 
subdivisions.  wildlife  subdivision  boundaries  are  included  in  maps  cf  all 
action  alternatives  ir.  the  FEIS.  For  mere  details  cn  thi6  topic  please  see 
Management  and  Mitigation  Measures  Specific  to  All  Action  Alternatives, 
Wildlife:  (Chapter  II  of  the  FEIS) . 

13  . ROAD  MILEAGE  EP.ROF-  IK  SUMMARY 

The  reconstructed  road  miles  for  Alternative  4 is  correct  (9.3  miles)  on 
page  2-13,  but  was  incorrect  in  the  Summary.  The  summary'  figure  has  been 
corrected  to  9.3  miles  likewise. 

14 . COMPUTER  PRINTOUTS  OK  SMOKE  ESTIMATION 

We  have  removed  the  computer  printouts  from  the  Appendix  of  the  Final  EIS  and 
moved  them  to  the  project  file.  They  will  be  available  upon  request 

15 . CLOSURE  OF  THE  MOYEF  PEA}'  JEEP  TRAIL 

The  Moyer  Peak  Jeep  Trail  (“6202)  would  remain  open  for  historical  access, 
except  for  the  spur  road  just  west  of  Meyer  Peak  in  the  SE1/4NV1/4  of 


the  FEIS. 


Cprinc  fr>r  Ihp  Lpcd  p^d  Servmc  People 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 1 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


Hadley  Roberts 


5 


Section  16.  This  spur  road  will  be  closed  by  creating  an  earthen  barrier 
that  prevents  vehicle  access. 

16  . PXSTRICTIOH  OF  LIVESTOCK  WITH  FENCES  AND  CATTLEGUAPJDS 

Wo  are  committed  to  install  cattleguards  on  new  roads  whenever  they  cross  ar. 
existing  fence.  There  are  presently  no  fences  in  the  Moyer  Salt  analysis 
area,  so  we  have  not  planned  any  cattleguards  on  the  roads. 

When  the  Forest  Plan  was  developed,  grazing  allotments,  wildlife  boundaries 
and  forage  production  capabilities  were  used  to  establish  livestock  grar-.no 
limits  at  levels  tc  prevent  1 i ves  tcck  ,/vi  ldl  i f e conflicts  By  increasin':  * ho 
available  area  within  a given  allotment  with  the  same  number  of  cattle,  th* 
result  is  a dispersal  of  livestock.  This  reduces  concentrated  use  in  a 
specific  area  and  thus  improves  the  general  range  condition,  resulting  in 
better  habitat  for  both  the  livestock  and  wildlife  The  key  elk  summer  rana 
areas  are  not  given  special  consideration.  Animal  units  per  month  (AUM' s 
per  allotment  will  not  increase  as  a result  of  this  timber  sale 

Alternative  6 has  been  listed  as  the  "PREFERRED*  Alternative  in  the  Final 
EIS.  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected"  Alternative  but  will  do  so  ir  th 
Record  of  Decision  Enclosed  is  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review.  Please  ha-.-p 
your  comments  back  to  us  within  the  30  day  comment  period. 

Sincerely. 


JOHT:  E . BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 


Enclosure 


Coring  for  the  Lnnd  ond  Serving  People 


■PkWro 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 2 


JuiydC1) 

Salmon  National  Forest 
DEIS  Response 
Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale 
Lynn  M.  Bennett 
F 0 Box  7 29 
Salmon  ID  83467 


Dear  Sirs: 


1 appreciate  receiving  your  Recent  Draft  Environmental  Impact 
Statement  for  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale.  1 am  glad  to  have  the 
opportunity  to  comment  in  a timely  manner. 

I would  give  my  half-hearted  support  to  Alternative  3.  It  seems  a bit 
note  probable  that  thi6  timber  sale  should  not  be  sold  at  all.  As 
suggested  by  the  General  Accounting  Office,  I feel  that  timber  should 
be  sold  only  at  a fully  burdened  price.  No  timber  should  be  sold 
below  cost. 


It  is  my  opinion  that  the  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area  should  not  be 
entered  for  timber  cutting  at  all,  at  this  time  or  any  other. 

Regrowth  after  cutting  will  be  difficult  (ch.  4,  pg  22)  and  a ti imber 
sale  would  result  in  significant  lo66  of  habitat  (4-26) 

I are  also  concerned  that  this  timber  sale  seems  inconsistent  with  the 
5 management  for  fisheries  water  quality  that  you  indicate  is  an 
objective  of  your  resource  management  plan. 


1 might  have  felt  more  confident  that  water  quality  objectives  had 
been  fully  taken  into  consideration  if  the  DEIS  contained  more 
detailed  information  from  field  surveys  indicating  locations  of 
springs,  wetlands,  and  temporary  streams. 


7 

8 


I would  have  appreciated  more  explicit  discussions  of  the  results  of 
your  field  surveys  for  sensitive  plants.  In  the  same  vein,  a full 
cultural  resource  survey  should  also  have  been  done  prior  to  the  DEIS, 
not  after  the  timber  is  sold. 


9 


A clerical  comment:  don’t  use  the  term  ’’over  mature  timber”  for 

"older  unproductive  trees."  ( 1-3,4-21,4-44)  Tnis  is  a loaded 
valuing  the  tree's  rapid  growing  adolescence  over  its  environmen 
more  significant  maturity.  The  trees  you  are  indicating  are  onl 
‘’over-mature’  in  terms  of  board-feet  product  value,  not  in  terms 
biosphere  value. 


term, 

tally 

y 

of 


l 


Finally,  in  the  section  of  the  DEIS  where  you  consider  economic  impact 
to  the  local  area  of  these  timber  sales,  you  need  to  appreciate  that 
change  in  the  timber  industry  cannot  be  prevented  via  the  sale  of 
timber.  Larger  influences  are  operating  to  lower  the  gross  product 
value  of  timber  in  the  economy:  aging  infrastructure,  machinery 

suited  only  to  large  old  growth  trees,  declining  rural  populations  to 
name  a few.  A below  cost  timber  sale  will  do  nothing  to  help  an 
already  stressed  timber  economy  nor  to  estabilite  a stressed  Forest 
Service  Budget. 

Thank  you  for  considering  my  comments.  I look  forward  to  hearing  how 
you  resolve  the  issues  thi6  timber  sale  brings  up. 

Sincerely , 


"V*“'YV 'V’VL/W 


Anne  Kinnaman 


SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


United  States 
Department  of 
Agriculture 


Forest 

Service 


Salmon 

National 

Forest 


P.0  Box  729 
Salmon,  ID  83467 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date  : 


Anne  Kinnaman 

14582  SE  Anna  Marie  Ct 

Milvaukie,  OR  97267 


Dear  Ms.  Kinnaman: 


Thank  you  for  your  comments  of  July  30, 
Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of 
have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our 
idea6  are  the  basis  for  our  response  to 
of  this  letter. 


1992  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  S 
the  environmental  analysis  proce 
team  of  resource  specialists 
your  concerns  and  comprise  the 


ale  . 
66  a 
The  i 
rest 


nd 


1 . BELOW  COST  TIMBER  SALES 

It  is  true  that  in  the  past  many  timber  sales  have  been  expected  to  have 
costs  in  excess  of  receipts.  That  is,  the  cost  of  preparation  and 
administration  is  expected  to  exceed  returns  to  the  Treasury'.  If  the  other 
benefits  associated  with  timber  harvest  are  ignored,  then  timber  management 
on  the  Salmon  National  Forest  in  the  past  would  appear  to  be  a poor 
investment . 


However,  in  addition  to  supplying  a portion  of  the  nation's  timber  needs, 
other  important  benefits  of  timber  harvest  are  employment , income,  and  the 
related  contribution  to  the  economic  diversity  of  dependent  communities. 
These  non-priced  benefits  are  not  given  a dollar  value  in  the  economic 
analysis,  nor  are  the  returns  to  the  Treasury  in  the  form  of  income  and 
corporate  taLxes  from  the  timber  industry  itself.  These  taxe6  can  offset  a 
sizeable  portion  of  the  cost  of  preparation  and  administration. 


Timber  management  is  the  only  resource  program  which  was  analyzed  strictly  on 
the  basis  of  direct  cash  flow  to  the  Treasury.  If  other  resource  programs 
were  valued  in  the  same  way,  most,  if  not  all,  would  appear  to  be  poor 
investments  based  on  present  net  value;  however,  most  other  resource?  6uch  a6 
recreation  are  valued  based  on  ■ vi 1 1 ingness - to-pay " , which  are  estimates  of 
what  non-market  benefits  are  worth  in  the  absence  of  established  market 
values.  Though  they  do  not  represent  any  cash  flow  to  the  Treasury',  these 
willingness- to-pay  values  are  considered  in  the  Moyer  Salt  overall  analysis 
and  not  reflected  in  the  economic  analysis.  The  important  thing  to  remember 
is  that  the  economic  analysis  doe6  not  display  the  whole  economic  picture. 


>*ld  P'  d S*‘rvi’»C  Fr'TC'L 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 2 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Salmon  National 


Forest  Response 


Anne  Kinnaman 


All  costs  and  benefits,  both  priced  and  non-priced,  were  considered  before 
selection  of  the  preferred  alternative. 


The  present  trend  in  timber  Bales  has  shown  a substantial  increase  in  the 
gross  income  received  from  similar  sales  (see  p.  IV-41,42  Moyer  Salt  DEIS). 
Using  the  increased  dollar  value  of  other  timber  sales  over  the  past  year  as 
an  indicator,  estimated  receipts  for  Moyer  Salt  would  be  enough  to  offset 
costs  and  provide  income  to  the  Treasury  as  veil.  If  thi6  present  trend 
proves  the  case  for  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  as  indications  predict,  its 
classification  as  a "below-cost"  timber  sale  would  not  be  accurate. 


2 . ROADLESS  CONCERNS 

As  indicated  in  the  Draft  Environmental  Impact  Statement  (EIS) , only  a 
portion  of  the  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area  would  be  affected  by  any  of  the 
action  alternatives.  As  currently  envisioned,  over  eighty  percent  of  the 
roadless  area  would  remain  undeveloped  into  the  foreseeable  future. 

3 . REGENERATION 

Your  letter  6tate6  that  "Pegrovth  after  cutting  will  be  difficult  (Ch  4, 
pg . 22)."  If  you  read  that  paragraph  again  you  will  find  that  delayed 
regeneration  could  be  expected  in  only  two  harvest  unit6  comprising  12  acre6 
or  approximately  2 percent  of  the  proposed  harvest  unit6.  The  "Past  Timber 
Harvest  Activity'"  section  on  page  3 -IS  of  the  DEIS  indicates  that  based  on 
previous  harvesting  on  similar  siteB,  reforestation  for  the  majority  of  the 
Moyer  Salt  area  6hould  be  highly  successful. 

The  National  Forest  Management  Act  states  that  regulations  should  be 
developed  specifying  guidelines  which  insure  that  timber  will  be  harvested 
only  where  "there  is  assurance  that  such  land6  can  be  adequately  restocked 
within  five  years  after  harvest."  These  "NFMA  Regulations"  (36  CFP  219) 
state  that  "when  tree6  are  cut  to  achieve  timber  production  objectives,  the 
cuttings  shall  be  made  in  such  a way'  as  to  assure  that  the  technology  and 
knowledge  exists  to  adequately'  restock  the  lands  within  five  years  after 
final  harvest."  The  initial  cut  in  the  shelterwood  and  seed  tree  methods  is 
normally  made  to  encourage  prompt  regeneration,  however  the  final  har- 
mu6t  often  be  delayed  more  than  five  years  to  ensure  that  there  will  be 
adequate  regeneration  after  the  final  harvest. 

4 . MAINTAIN  WILDLIFE  HABITAT 

As  explained  in  the  DEIS,  all  action  alternatives  propose  timber  harvest 
activities  in  various  portions  of  key  elk  summer  range  (KESR) . The  current 
or  natural  elk  habitat  potential  (EHP)  in  the  lower  elevation  portion  cf  thi6 
area,  wildlife  Area  I,  is  approximately  67  percent  and  in  the  upper  elevation 
portion.  Wildlife  Area  II,  it  is  87  percent.  The  various  proposed  action 
alternatives  would  reduce  EHP  in  Area  I to  a low  of  approximately  48  percent 
under  Alternative  4 and  increase  EHP  to  a high  of  approximately'  92  percent, 
also  under  Alternative  4 . Consequently,  the  net  effect  on  EHP  in  the 
analysis  area  will  be  nearly  neutral  in  the  short  term  and  in  the  MESR  it 
will  be  positive. 


Caring  for  the  Lsnd  snd  Serving  People 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 2 


Salinon  National  Forest  Response 


Anne  Kinnaman 


3 . 


In  addition  the  snag  retention  and  replacement  guidelines  and  old  growth 
retention  areas,  both  of  which  are  contained  in  our  current  Forest  Flan 
direction,  will  help  maintain  habitat  for  at  least  minimum  viable  population 
of  small  game  and  nongame  birds  and  mammals. 

5 . MAINTAIN  FISH  HABITAT 

Conclusions  reached  within  the  DEIS  regarding  expected  effects  to  water 
quality  and  aquatic  habitats  are  based  upon  available  information, 
professional  experience  and  judgement,  and  related  research.  In  the  case  of 
the  proposed  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale,  the  Hydrology  Effects  section  of  the 
FEIS  discusses  the  history,  nature,  and  effects  of  activities  within  a 
neighboring  watershed  of  similar  geologic  origin,  in  order  to  provid°  a 
foundation  upon  which  conclusions  concerning  expected  effects  to  water 
quality  and  aquatic  habitat  within  the  Woodtick  Creek  and  Moyer  Creek 
watersheds  can  be  based.  As  indicated  within  the  FEIS,  post  - irnpl ementat i on 
aquatic  conditions  observed  within  the  Deep  Creek  drainage,  with  road  design, 
layout  and  densities  similar  to  or  exceeding  those  of  the  proposed  Moyer  Salt 
action  alternatives,  strengthen  the  conclusions  that,  with  the  exception  of 
Alternative  3,  the  levels  of  timber  management  activity  proposed  within  the 
array  of  Moyer  Salt  action  alternatives  are  indeed  fully  compatible  with 
Forest  water  quality  and  aquatic  habitat  maintenance  goal6.  The  probable 
incompatibility  of  Alternative  3 with  water  quality  and  fisheries  resource 
goals  stems  from  an  6 i te - specif i c inability  to  effectively  implement,  within 
the  Salt  Creek  drainage,  those  same  mitigation  measures  which  have  been 
proven  successful  within  other  Forest  watersheds  in  protecting  and 
maintaining  aquatic  habitats. 

Pre - implementation  substrate  core  sampling  operations  on  Woodtick  Creek,  and 
post  - implementation  core  sampling  operations  on  Deep  Creek,  have  indicated 
that  substrate  conditions  currently  exceed  maximum  habitat  potential  on  both 
streams.  Although  lab  analysis  of  macroinvertebrates  is  not  yet  complete, 
cursor)'  observations  have  shown  no  discernable  difference  in  diversity  or 
vigor  between  pre-project  Woodtick  Creek  populations  and  post  - irpl ement a t i on 
Deep  Creek  populations.  Given  the  current  condition  of  substrate  quality 
within  the  Moyer  Salt  analysis  area,  and  the  observed  post - implementat ion 
conditions  within  the  Deep  Creek  drainage,  there  is  little  evidence  to 
suggest  that  macrcinvertebrate  or  vertebrate  aquatic  resources  would  be 
adversely  impacted  as  a result  of  implementation  of  action  Alternatives  2, 

2A,  4,  5,  or  6 . Additional  analysis  of  Alternative  3 beyond  that  included 
within  the  DEIS,  has  identified  an  high  risk  of  surface  erosion  and  sediment 
impacts  within  the  Salt  Creek  drainage,  and  a consequent  risk  to  existing 
macroinvertebrate  and  vertebrate  aquatic  species. 

6 . WATER  QUALITY 

The  project  files  contain  maps  of  the  wetlands  within  the  analysis  area 
Since  there  was  not  any  significant  difference  between  the  action 
alternatives  in  regards  to  wetland  impacts,  thi6  information  was  not 
displayed  in  the  DEIS. 


Cerino  for  the  Lend  an'*  Srrvinr  Frcr'r 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 2 


Salmon  National 


Forest  Response 


Anne  Kinnaman 


7 . PLANT  SUPVEY 


The  entire  sale  area  was  not  surveyed  for  sensitive  plants.  However,  much  of 
the  area  was  looked  at  during  the  field  work  for  this  proposal.  The  only  two 
sensitive  species  that  are  likely,  based  on  habitat  types,  to  be  present  are 
pink  aqoseris  and  Lemhi  penstemon.  Numerous  trips  through  the  wet  meadows 
near  Moyer  Peak  failed  to  reveal  any  specimens  of  pink  aqoseris  The  Moyer 
Creek  area  was  also  surveyed  for  Lemhi  penstemon  but  no  plants  were  observed 
even  through  this  species  is  known  to  occur  in  the  upper  portion  of  the 
Panther  Creek  drainage. 


8 . NATIONAL  HISTORIC  PRESERVATION  ACT  REQUIREMENTS 

Title  36  of  the  Code  of  Federal  Regulations  Part  800  requires  a cultural 
resource  inventory  when  necessary  to  determine  effects  to  Histone  Properties 
(i.e.,  cultural  sites  that  are  eligible  to  the  National  Register  of  Historic 
Places)  and  to  consult  with  the  Idaho  State  Historic  Preservation  Office 
(SHPO)  on  the  method  of  inventory',  the  results  of  the  inventory,  and  the 
effect  to  Historic  Properties.  Under  a Forest  Service  Washington  Office 
memo,  dated  October  9,  1991,  we  are  required  to  complete  these  actions  and 
consultation  with  the  SHPO  prior  to  the  Deciding  Officer's  signing  of  the 
Decision  Notice  (DN) . 


A cultural  inventory  of  the  majority  of  cutting  unit6  and  all  road 
construction  has  taken  place.  No  Historic  Properties  were  found  and  SHPO 
consultation  was  completed  on  August  18.  1992.  However,  due  to  newly 
proposed  alternatives,  6mall  portions  of  Units  19,  S-l,  S-2,  S-3,  S-5,  S-6, 
and  S - 7 within  Alternative  4 and  of  Units  S12,  S16,  S15,  S13,  S6  , 25,  26,  28, 
and  30  within  Alternative  6 need  to  be  inventoried.  Based  on  previous 
results,  no  cultural  resources  are  expected  in  the  remaining  unit6  and  SHPO 
clearance  is  expected  by  August  1,  1993. 

The  closure  of  the  spur  road  just  west  of  Moyer  Peak  in  the  SE1/4  of  the 
NWl/4  of  Section  16  has  very'  little  potential  to  adversely  effect  a historic 
property.  The  road  does  not  appear  on  any  historic  Forest  maps  nor  are  there 
any  historic  mining  claims  noted  in  the  Forest  Land  Status  Atlas  that  it 
would  have  serviced.  Since  the  closure  is  on  6teep  and  rocky  ground  there  16 
a very  low  potential  of  effecting  a prehistoric  or  historic  Native  American 
traditional  use  6ite  or  archaeological  site.  Therefore,  it  is  the  Forest 
Archeologist's  opinion  that  the  spur  road  closure  will  have  a low  potential 
for  adverse  effect. 

In  summary,  your  comments  are  well  taken,  and  the  Salmon  National  Forest  will 
ensure  that  two  actions  are  taken  prior  to  signing  the  Decision  Notice. 

Since  the  Moyer  Peak  Jeep  Trail  will  not  be  affected  by  this  project,  no 
consultation  with  the  Idaho  State  Historic  Preservation  Office  (SHPO)  or 
Advisory  Council  on  Historic  Preservation  is  warranted.  A survey  report 
detailing  investigations  of  the  units  and  the  mining  road  closure  that  have 
not  been  previously  inventoried  will  be  forwarded  to  the  Idaho  SHPO.  If  any 
historic  properties  are  located  during  the  inventory  avoidance  measures  to 
assure  "no  effect"  will  be  implemented  with  appropriate  SHPO  and  Advisory 
Council  consultation  prior  to  signing  the  Decision  Notice. 


Caring  lor  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200  28b(3'9 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 2 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


Anne  Kinnaman 


5 . 


9 . TERMINOLOGY 


In  your  letter  you  request  that  the  term  "older  unproductive  trees"  be  used 
in  place  of  "overmature  timber."  We  disagree  with  your  assertion  that 
"overmature  timber"  is  a connotation  for  "valuing  the  tree's  rapid  growing 
adolescence  over  its  environmentally  more  significant  maturity."  we  feel 
that  the  definition  of  "overmature  timber"  as  stated  in  the  DEIS,  page  1-3, 
paragraph  2,  i6  clear  and  not  subject  to  a variety  of  philosophical 
interpretations.  The  definition  given  in  the  DEIS  is  the  6ame  as  that  used 
in  the  Salmon  National  Forest  Land  and  Resource  Management  Plan.  (See 
glossary.  VI -25.)  We  do  agree  with  your  point  that  regardless  of  a tree' 6 
age  or  state  of  health,  it  has  or  provides  values  other  than  beard  feet.  The 
fact  that  we  do  agree  should  be  evident  by  examining  Chapter  < of  the  DEIS 
A good  portion  of  this  chapter  is  devoted  to  estimating  and  displaying  the 
resource  tradeoffs  incurred  when  harvesting  "overmature"  timber. 

Alternative  6 has  been  listed  as  the  "PREFERRED"  Alternative  in  the  Final 
EIS.  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected"  Alternative  but  will  do  60  in  the 
Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review.  Please  have 
your  comments  bach  to  us  in  30  days. 

Sincerely, 


JOHN  E.  BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


Caring  for  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200  2SM3  u 


MOYER  SALT 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 3 


United  States 
Environmental  Protection 
Agency 


EPA 

REPLY  TO 
ATTN  OF: 


Region  10  Alaska 

1200  Sirth  Avenue  Idaho 

Seattle  WA  90101  Oregon 

Washington 

SALMON  N F 


WD-126 


St  PIG  m2 


SEP  2 1 'S2 


John  Burns 
Forest  Supervisor 
Salmon  National  Forest 
P O.  Box  729 
Salmon,  Idaho  83467 

Dear  Mr.  Burns: 


Info  O 


Action  [ 


SUP 

i } 

T 

4 

TT 

LMP 

I 2 

3 

4 

5 6 

TAF 

1 2 

3 

4 

5 6 

ELM 

1 2 

3 

4 

5 6 

2RWW 

1 2 

3 

4 

5 6 

AO 

1 ? 

3 

4 

5 6 

RONR 

1 2 

3 

4 

JEPA  ] 

1 2 

3 

4 

5 6 

CCT»  TCk 

The  Environmental  Protection  Agency  (EPA)  has  reviewed  the  draft 
Environmental  Impact  Statement  (EIS)  frr  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  located  in  the 
Cobalt  Ranger  District  on  the  Saimon  National  Forest.  Our  review  was  conducted  in 
accordance  with  the  National  Environmental  Policy  Act  (NEPA)  and  our  responsibilities 
under  Section  309  of  the  Clean  Air  Act. 


This  draft  EIS  evaluates  the  no  action  alternative  and  three  action  alternatives 
for  timber  harvest,  road  construction,  and  management  of  other  resources  in  the 
planning  areas.  A range  of  alternatives  was  developed  that  implements  the  Forest 
Plan  and  addresses  major  issues  that  were  identified  during  the  project  planning  and 
scoping  process.  The  Forest  Service  has  not  identified  a preferred  alternative  for  this 
timber  sale. 

We  provided  scoping  comments  on  this  proposed  action  in  November,  1990. 
We  identified  a number  of  significant  issues  that  we  felt  should  be  discussed  and 
evaluated  in  the  draft  EIS.  We  requested: 

■ a description  of  the  existing  water  quality  and  an  analysis  of  the  effects  of  the 
proposed  sale  on  designated  uses  and  maintenance  of  state  water  quality 
standards; 

■ information  about  the  soils  in  the  study  area  and  the  potential  for  erosion 
problems  and  mass  wasting; 

■ a description  of  existing  air  quality  and  a comprehensive  analysis  of  the  effects 
of  prescribed  burning; 

■ a discussion  of  mitigation  measures  and  the  effectiveness  of  mitigation 
measures;  and 

■ a description  of  a detailed  monitoring  plan. 

This  draft  EIS  is  well  written  and  was  quite  responsive  to  our  scoping 
comments.  The  air  quality  analysis  represents  the  most  comprehensive  evaluation  of 
prescribed  burning  that  we  have  had  the  opportunity  to  review  in  an  EIS  to  date.  The 
staff  should  be  commended  for  their  efforts.  We  support  the  conceptual  analytical 
approach  that  was  used.  The  analysis  included  the  following  steps' 


SALE 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


United  States 
ii  Department  of 
' Agriculture 


Forest 

Service 


Salmon 
Nat ional 
Forest 


P.O.  Box  729 
Salmon.  ID  83467 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date  : 


Kathy  Veit,  Chief 

Environmental  Protection  Agency 

Region  10 

1200  Sixth  Avenue 

Seattle,  WA  98101 


Dear  Ms . Vei t : 

Thank  you  for  your  comments  of  July,  16.  1992  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale 
Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis  process  and 
have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource  specialists.  Their 
ideas  are  the  basis  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and  comprise  the  rest 
of  thi6  letter. 

1 . APPLICATION  OF  SMOKE  MODEL 

Gary  Jackson,  our  air  quality  specialist,  sent  you  information  on  how  to 
obtain  the  SASEM  MODEL  and  we  agree  that  you  should  review  it  for  the 
mountainous  areas  of  Idaho. 

2 . WATER  MONITORING 

The  details  for  Water  Quality  and  Fisheries  monitoring  are  disclosed  in  the 
FEIS , Chapter  II  under  Project  Monitoring.  Water  quality  data  was  collected 
on  Moyer  Creek  and  Woodtick  Creek  during  1992.  Thi6  data  is  discussed  in  the 
FEIS,  Chapter  III  under  Hydrology  and  Fisheries. 

3 . NATIONAL  MARINE  FISHERIES  CONCURRENCE  WITH  BIOLOGICAL  ASSESSMENT 

The  FEIS  is  being  released  on  the  assumption  of  concurrence  with  the 
Biological  Assessment  findings  by  NMFS . Should  NMFS  not  concur  with  the 
findings  of  the  Biological  Assessment,  then  the  project  will  be  modified  to 
meet  the  recommendations  of  NMFS,  and  a decision  will  be  issued  to  that 
effect.  The  project  will  not  be  implemented  until  final  concurrence  is 
reached  with  NMFS. 

Alternative  6 has  been  listed  as  the  ’PREFERRED*  Alternative  in  the  Final 
EIS.  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected"  Alternative  but  will  do  so  in  the 


Caring  lor  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-f>200-28b(3'92) 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 3 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


2 

■ Quantify  the  amount  of  burning  activity  (acres,  tons  of  fuel,  type  of  material, 

etc.); 

■ Describe  the  type  of  burns  (broadcast  burns,  piled  burns,  understory  burning, 
etc.); 

■ Describe  any  measures  to  reduce  emissions  (fuel  moisture  contents,  site 
preparation/scarification,  fuel  removal  through  firewood  programs,  etc.); 

■ Quantify  the  amount  of  emissions  of  regulated  air  pollutants; 

■ Describe  the  regulatory/permit  requirements  for  burning,  especially  smoke 
management  plans  where  applicable;  and 

■ Provide  a qualitative  description  of  the  air  quality  impacts  of  burning  activities, 
focusing  on  new  or  increased  impacts  on  downwind  communities,  visibility 
impacts  in  Class  I areas,  etc. 

We  are  interested  in  reviewing  the  application  of  the  Simple  Approach  Smoke 
Estimation  Model  used  in  this  draft  EIS.  We  understand  that  the  model  Is  designed  for 
use  in  flat  terrain  situations.  Results  from  it  could  potentially  underestimate  the  air 

1 quality  impacts  in  the  complex  terrain  found  in  the  study  area.  We  would  provide  you 
with  any  additional  comments  that  we  might  have  once  we  have  completed  the  review. 
The  steps  described  above  are  an  excellent  analytical  approach. 

2 Our  major  concern  with  the  proposed  action  is  the  effect  of  the  timber  sale  on 
the  water  quality  of  Moyer  and  Woodtick  Creeks.  These  creeks  drain  into  Panther 
Creek.  As  the  draft  EIS  points  out,  the  Moyer  Creek  drainage  has  been  identified  as 
the  most  important  chinook  salmon  spawning  tributary  of  the  Panther  Creek  drainage 
system.  These  spring/summer  chinook  salmon  were  recently  listed  as  threatened  by 
the  National  Marine  Fisheries  Service  (NMFS).  Although  the  fish  do  not  currently  use 
the  Moyer  drainage  due  to  downstream  water  quality  problems,  the  water  quality  must 
be  maintained  and  protected  so  the  chinook  salmon  can  return  to  the  spawning  and 
rearing  habitat  found  in  Moyer  Creek  when  the  downstream  acid  mine  drainage 
problems  in  Blackbird  Creek  and  Panther  Creek  are  controlled. 

Our  water  quality  concerns  are  based  on  the  stated  fact  that  the  1988  Tick 
Creek  timber  sale  resulted  in  significant  sedimentation  problems  in  Little  Woodtick 
Creek.  Our  concern  is  whether  best  management  practices  (BMPs)  were  followed  for 
the  1988  sale.  II  BMPs  were  implemented,  they  apparently  were  not  effective. 

It  is  our  understanding  that  with  regard  to  water  quality  the  Forest  Service  will 
exercise  its  statutory  authority  and  responsibility  as  the  lead  agency  for  implementing 
and  enforcing  natural  resource  management  programs  for  the  protection  of  water 
quality  on  federal  lands  under  its  jurisdiction.  The  achievement  of  water  quality 
standards  for  non-point  source  activities  occurs  through  the  implementation  of  BMPs 
which  are  designed  to  achieve  water  quality  standards.  Water  quality  standards 
criteria  are  the  measures  by  which  BMP  effectiveness  is  judged.  While  BMPs  are 
believed  to  protect  water  quality,  they  must  be  monitored  to  determine  that  this  is  the 


Kathy  Veit,  Chief 

Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review, 
your  comments  back  to  us  in  30  days. 


Sincerely, 


JOHN  E . BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


Caring  lor  the  Lend  end  Serving  People 


2 . 

Please  have 


FS-6200-28b(3'92) 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


case.  If  they  are  not  effective,  then  the  BMPs  must  be  revised.  Therefore,  mere 
application  of  BMPs  is  not  adequate  to  satisfy  the  Clean  Water  Act.  The  final  EIS 
should  discuss  in  greater  detail  any  monitoring  results  that  indicate  the  effectiveness  of 
BMPs  to  protect  designated  uses  and  maintain  state  water  quality  standards. 

We  request  that  the  final  EIS  include  the  Biological  Assessment  or  a summary 
of  it  as  well  as  the  NMFS  Biological  Opinion/concurrence  with  the  findings  in  the 
Biological  Assessment.  There  are  a number  of  reasons  for  including  the  Biological 
Assessment  and  the  NMFS  Biological  Opinion/concurrence  in  the  final  EIS. 

■ NEPA  requires  full  disclosure  on  all  issues  and  public  involvement  In  all  aspects 
of  the  decision, 

■ The  Council  on  Environmental  Quality  Regulations  for  Implementing  the 
Procedural  Provisions  of  NEPA  encourage  the  integration  of  NEPA  requirements 
with  other  environmental  review  and  consultation  requirements  (1502.25),  and 

■ The  Endangered  Species  Act  (ESA)  consultation  process  can  result  in  the 
identification  of  mandatory  reasonable  and  prudent  alternatives  for  a jeopardy 
opinion  and  reasonable  and  prudent  measures  for  an  adverse  modification 
opinion. 

We  believe  that  the  final  EIS  and  Record  of  Decision  should  not  be  completed 
prior  to  the  completion  of  Section  7 consultation.  The  effect  of  the  timber  sales  on  a 
Threalened  or  Endangered  (T  or  E)  species  in  or  near  the  planning  area  is  relevant  to 
the  decision  at  hand:  whether  to  cut,  where  to  cut,  when  to  cut  and  under  what 
conditions  to  cut  timber.  Both  the  Biological  Assessment  and  the  EIS  must  evaluate 
the  potential  Impacts  of  the  proposed  action  on  T and  E species  and  the  EIS  must 
fully  disclose  the  impacts.  Integration  of  the  analysis  of  reasonable  and  prudent 
alternatives/miligation  measures  required  by  ESA  and  the  analysis  of  feasible 
alternatives/miligation  is  required  by  NEPA. 

If  the  consultation  process  is  treated  as  a parallel  process  it  is  conceivable  that 
reasonable  and  prudent  alternatives/mitigation  measures  to  avoid  a Jeopardy/adverse 
modification  opinion,  which  have  not  been  evaluated  in  this  final  EIS,  could  be 
developed  during  the  ESA  consultation  process.  If  the  Section  7 consultation  process 
is  completed  after  the  EIS  process  for  this  sale  Is  completed,  then  a supplement  to  the 
final  EIS  could  be  warranted. 

Based  on  our  review,  we  are  rating  this  draft  EIS  EC-2  (Environmental 
Concerns-lnsufficient  Information).  Our  environmental  concerns  are  based  on  the 
potential  for  adverse  water  quality  effects.  Documentation  of  consultation 
requirements  of  Section  7 of  ESA  is  also  needed.  An  explanation  of  the  EPA  rating 
system  for  draft  EISs  is  enclosed  for  your  reference.  This  rating  and  a summary  of 
these  comments  will  be  published  in  the  Federal  Register. 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 3 


3 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 3 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


4 

We  appreciate  the  opportunity  to  review  and  provide  comments  on  this  draft 
EIS.  If  you  have  any  questions  about  our  review  comments  please  contact 
Sally  Brough  in  our  Environmental  Review  Section  at  (206)  553-4012. 

Sincerely, 

Kathy  Veit,  Chief 

Program  Coordination  Branch 


Enclosure 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 4 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


Tlo 


S , /<?<?£ 


^ ZI b . 


*3  20/ 


zog 


fllA.  i _ P U/M'-ZL J 1'/ 

/^ruvY" 

Po  6 c/  ?2<? 

,.$4i«un/  jiC>  ysy<2  7 

/§JLaa.  . ?1lA  P-U'VkA. y 


35  7 V<30t 

SALMON  N.  F. 

t-T,  6 '92 


Info  0 
sim 

Acl  on  Cl 

tup 

1 2 

3 

4 

5 8 

IAF 

1 2 

3 

4 

S 6 

ELM 

1 2 

3 

4 

5 ft 

RRY.'W 

1 2 

3 

4 

5 6 

AO 

1 2 

3 

4 

5 ft 

cciio- 

IlTuP,--^  /o  /Ttu  -ZJO^t-ortxL.  t Kj^ 

sddU  mP Pum.  Aicrr^r>ui\  AcU^ 

JU^_  _#*__  §tu£t.  OU~C*k.  I pUi-  /*-»<-  Avi-ct 

^ ^^XAtjpvx, ^^i</u£i-U<JCrr}1^C*^_j 

Pcbll<tP  To 


X-  ... 


cu-wj^i^T.  .. 


Su^aPj) 


9 ^AJsCfm*rr~l*', JPtiUtV-C  'P<r‘  /tfV-'M /tf-MPn-P 
PotPJjL^  tyv-xi^JL*- z^nP.  ^Te-'O-cjui.  tS'-P-P  - P>  At  c'??ya./t.-fr<£*uP<P 


_ cut  aPP_  _._  P>.  /HAt^J aPA~-  6a~6i6«P < 

/tPPo\^K^P<. i~o  . ? 7o_.  J>X d-Z-ZZfO-/&ASTe 

(^/yrV>^>upLp  1 ^cplprux^,Ka  Jl^y4<^j_c'r ?_/£e  ^L/SZUp 

} //<^y/~  Ap<JpPtJo~  / 


AAX~Ap-__ 

P~*-/ri6&Ut. 


Pt^zPHUU. UUV-4.-  C/Ctzr^P*>~~  . 


— .^W- 3/ 

aj- 


izJLe-v 


United  States 
Department  of 
Agriculture 


Forest 

Service 


Salmon 

National 

Forest 


P.0.  Box  729 
Salmon.  ID  83467 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date  : 


Nancy  Jochem 
2770  Kootenai 
Pocatello.  ID  83201 


Dear  Ms.  Jochem: 

Thank  you  for  your  comments  of  August  5,  1992  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale. 
Your  comments  are  am  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis  process  and 
have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource  specialists.  Their 
ideas  are  the  basis  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and  comprise  the  rest 
of  this  letter. 

1 . MAINTAIN  WILDLIFE  HABITAT 

As  explained  in  the  DEIS,  all  action  alternatives  propose  timber  harvest 
activities  in  various  portions  of  key  elk  summer  range  (KESR) . The  current 
or  natural  elk  habitat  potential  (EHP)  in  the  lower  elevation  portion  of  this 
area,  Wildlife  Area  I,  is  approximately  67  percent  and  in  the  upper  elevation 
portion.  Wildlife  Area  II,  it  is  87  percent.  The  various  proposed  action 
alternatives  would  reduce  EHP  in  Area  I to  a low  of  approximately  48  percent 
under  Alternative  4 and  increase  EHP  to  a high  of  approximately  92  percent, 
also  under  Alternative  4.  Consequently,  the  net  effect  on  EHP  in  the 
analysis  area  will  be  nearly  neutral  in  the  6hort  term  and  in  the  KESR  it 
will  be  positive. 

In  addition  the  snag  retention  and  replacement  guidelines  and  old  growth 
retention  areas,  both  of  which  are  contained  in  our  current  Forest  Plan 
direction,  will  help  maintain  habitat  for  at  least  minimum  viable  population 
of  small  game  and  nongame  bird6  and  mammals . 

2 . RESTRICTION  OF  LIVESTOCK  WITH  FENCES  AND  CATTLEGUARDS 

We  are  committed  to  install  cattleguards  on  new  roads  whenever  they  cross  an 
existing  fence.  There  are  presently  no  fences  in  the  Moyer  Salt  analysis 
area,  so  we  have  not  planned  any  cattleguards  on  the  roads . 

When  the  Forest  Plan  was  developed,  grazing  allotments,  wildlife  boundaries, 
and  forage  production  capabilities  were  used  to  establish  livestock  grazing 
limits  at  levels  to  prevent  livestock/wildlife  conflicts.  By  increasing  the 


Caring  for  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200-28b(3'92) 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 4 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


W1  Nancy  Jochem 


2 . 


available  area  within  a given  allotment  with  the  same  number  of  cattle,  the 
result  is  a dispersal  of  livestock.  This  reduces  concentrated  use  in  a 
specific  area  and  thus  improves  the  general  range  condition,  resulting  in 
better  habitat  for  both  the  livestock  and  wildlife.  The  key  elk  summer  range 
areas  are  not  given  special  consideration.  Animal  units  per  month  (AUN's) 
per  allotment  will  not  increase  as  a result  of  thi6  timber  sale. 

Alternative  6 has  been  listed  as  the  "PREFERRED*  Alternative  in  the  Final 
EIS.  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected"  Alternative  but  will  do  so  in  the 
Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  i6  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review.  Please  have 
your  comments  back  to  us  in  30  days. 

Sincerely, 


JOHN  E.  BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


Caring  for  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


F S-6200- 28b(  3 '92 ) 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 5 


oano  Montana  Wyoming  Oregon  Washington  Alberta  British  Columbia 

\lliance  for  the  Wild  Rockies 

.0x  8731  Missoula.  Montana  59807  • 4 06- 72  1 - 5‘1 20 


August  6,  1992 

Lynn  Bennett  - Moyer  Salt  DEIS 
Salmon  National  Forest 
Box  729 

salmon.  ID  83167 


i • r 


Dear  Ms.  Bennett. 

Thank  you  for  the  opportunity  to  comment  on  the  Moyer  Salt  timber  sale  Draft 
Environmental  Impact  Statement.  The  following  is  a list  of  the  issues  and  problems  we  at 
the  Alliance  for  the  Wild  Rockies  feel  should  be  addressed  before  a Decision  is  rendered  for 
this  proposed  projecL 

I.  ROADLESS  RESOURCE 

The  IS  Chief's  IRNE  appeal  decision  states  that  the  Eorest  Rians  have  made  only 
general  allocation  decisions.  It  stated  that  roadless  area  decisions  were  reviewable  at  the 
project  level,  that  ’Prior  to  a decision  to  proceed  with  a roadless  area  project  that  is 
Inconsistent  with  preserving  the  roadless  character  and  wilderness  features  of  the  area,  the 
Forest  will  analyze  and  document  the  direct,  indirect,  and  cumulative  impacts  of  the 
proposed  action.’  (p.  13).  'Die  decision  goes  on  to  say  "The  responsible  Forest  Service 

official  has  the  discretion  to  decide not  to  proceed  with  the  proposed  project,  and 

thereby  maintain  the  roadless  character  and  wilderness  potential  of  the  area. 

Thus,  the  Salmon  National  Forest  must  look  beyond  the  simple  question  of  what 
will  happen  to  the  roadless  qualities  of  the  analysis  areas.  (6)The  Chief's  1PNF  decision 
mandates  that  a site  specific  NEPA  analysis  reexamine  the  wildemess/nonwildcmess 
allocation  made  in  the  Forest  Plan  to  determine  if  it  is  correct  The  DEIS  has  not  provided 
'.his  analysis. 

Die  Taylor  Mountain  roadless  area  is  being  proposed  for  Wilderness  designation  in 
.lie  Northern  Rockies  Ecosystem  Protection  Act,  which  will  be  introduced  in  the  U S. 
Congress  by  Rep  Peter  Kostmayer  (D-PA).  The  Forest  Service  should  not  usurp  the  right 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


United  States 
Department  of 
Agriculture 


Forest 

Service 


Salmon 
Nat ional 
ForeBt 


P.0.  Box  729 
Salmon,  ID  83467 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date  : 


Dan  FunBch 
Program  Assistant 
Alliance  for  the  Wild  Rockies 
Box  0731 

Missoula.  MT  59007 


Dear  Mr.  Funsch: 

Thank  you  for  your  comments  of  August  6,  1992  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale. 
Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis  process  and 
have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource  specialists  Their 
ideas  are  the  basis  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and  comprise  the  rest 
of  this  letter. 

1 . WILDERNESS  CONCERNS 

This  Environmental  Impact  Statement  (EIS)  will  not  reexamine  the 
wildemess/nonwildemess  allocation  that  was  made  in  the  Salmon  National 
Forest  Land  and  Resource  Management  Plan.  Instead,  it  provides  an  analysis 
of  the  development /no  development  issue  and  will  display  the  effects  to  the 
roadless  characteristics  caused  by  the  various  alternatives.  These 
alternatives  range  from  no  effect  on  the  roadless  characteristics  to  high 
effects  on  less  than  twenty  percent  of  the  entire  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless 
Area.  The  EIS  doe6  analyze  and  document  the  direct,  indirect  and  cumulative 
impacts  of  the  proposed  action  on  the  roadle66  resource. 

The  Taylor  Mountain  Roadle66  Area  is  not  included  in  any  existing  proposal  by 
the  administration  for  wilderness  designation,  nor  are  we  aware  of  its 
inclusion  in  any  proposed  legislation  that  is  currently  being  seriously 
considered  for  introduction  or  that  enjoy6  any  degree  of  broad-based  support. 

2 . WATER  QUALITY 

Water  quality  data  was  collected  on  Moyer  Creek  and  Woodtick  Creek  in  1992 
following  the  release  of  the  DEIS.  Parameters  measured  include  water 
temperature,  carbon  dioxide,  hardness,  alkalinity,  acidity,  pH,  dissolved 
oxygen,  sulfate,  phosphate,  nitrate,  specific  conductivity, 
macroinvertebrates  and  fine  sediment  (core  sampling) . The  results  of  this 
monitoring  are  discussed  in  the  FEIS,  Chapter  III.  Hydrology  and  Fisheries. 


Caring  lor  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200  28b(3'92) 


MOYER  SA 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 5 


of  the  American  public,  through  Congress,  to  debate  the  wilderness  suitability  of  this 
roadless  area. 

II  SEDIMENT  LEVELS,  WATER  QUALITY  AND  FISH  IIAUITAT 

We  are  very'  concerned  about  sediment  effects  to  water  quality  and  fish  habitats  due 
to  road  construction  and  timber  harvest.  In  this  pristine  watershed,  with  a Management 
Area  designation  for  anadromous  fisheries  habitat,  these  types  of  developments  may  be 
incompatible  with  protecting  the  fisheries  resource  One  purpose  of  the  DEIS  should  be  to 
validate  or  lest  the  Forest  Elan  allocations,  but  the  DIFS  fails  to  do  so.  Rather,  it  assumes 
that  timber  harvest  and  road  building  will  be  compatible  with  anadromous  fisheries 
repopulation.  We  disagree,  and  feel  that  the  DBS  is  deficient  in  its  analysis  of  the  impacts 
to  water  quality  and  fish. 

Statements  in  the  DEIS  reveal  the  paucity  of  data,  and  the  lack  of  a scientific 
understanding  of  the  current  water  quality  situation  in  the  project  area.  Die  DEIS  states  on 
page  3-5  that  "No  water  quality  data  has  been  collected  in  the  Moyer  of  Woodtick  drainages 
to  quantitatively  assess  whether  the  water  quality  objectives  specified  in  the  Forest  I lan 
have  been  achieved."  Tius  lack  of  data  is  irresponsible,  particularly  in  light  of  past  timber 
harvest  in  Woodtick  Creek.  According  to  the  DEIS  (same  page),  twenty  three  rutting  units 
resulted  in  increased  water  yield  and  subsequent  stream  bank  and  stream  bed  erosion.  In 
other  words,  logging  had  destabilized  and  eroded  the  stream  bank.  And  yet  the  Forest 
Service  proclaims  that  "No  significant  stream  sedimentation  is  anticipated  from  the 
proposed  action  alternatives  ..."  (page  4-4).  The  lack  of  water  quality  information  alone 
warrants  a revision  of  the  FJS.  I low  can  the  decision  maker  make  an  informed  decision 
without  this  type  of  information?  How  can  the  public?  The  DEIS  cleatly  does  not  meet 
the  intent  of  NEPA’s  disclosure  requirements. 

We  are  seriously  concerned  that  any  additional  sediment  loading  may  jeopardize  the 
viability  of  bull  trout,  a sensitive  species,  in  the  project  area.  Our  concern  is  magnified 
because  of  cumulative  effects  caused  by  the  proposed  action  and  past  sedimentation  from 
management  activities  in  the  drainage.  The  draft  EIS  fails  to  adequately  assess  these 
cumulative  impacts. 

Please  include  in  the  PEIS  tire  results  of  sediment  modelling,  using  an  accepted 
model,  and  please  also  include  an  analysis  of  these  increased  sediment  rates  on  the  health 
and  survival  of  aquatic  insects  and  fisheries. 

Ill  WATER  YIELD 

Water  yield  will  almost  certainly  increase  because  of  the  proposed  action,  but  the 
Forest  Service  has  not  examined  the  effects  these  increases  will  have.  The  I FIS  must 


TIMBER  SALE 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


Mr . Funsch 


3 .  WATER  YIELD 


Timber  harvest  in  the  Little  Woodtick  Creek  drainage  did  result  in  stream 
channel  erosion  a6  a result  of  significantly  increased  water  yields  in  the 
watershed.  Twenty-three  percent  of  this  drainage  was  harvested  which 
resulted  in  increased  water  yield  and  a synchronization  of  snovmelt  runoff 
from  thi6  small  drainage.  Research  has  Ghown  that  timber  harvesting  can 
increase  total  water  yield  from  a drainage  due  to  a reduction  of 
transpiration  from  tree  removal  and  an  increase  in  Gnow  accumulation  in  the 
cutting  unit6.  However,  research  ha6  also  chovn  that  a significant  portion 
of  a watershed  has  to  be  harvested  before  a significant  change  in  flow  is 
detectable.  Some  research  has  shown  that  20  to  30  percent  of  a watershed  hae 
to  be  harvested  before  a significant  change  in  flow  can  be  detected  Th:6 
research  is  cited  in  the  DEIS  and  the  FEIS  The  proposed  action  alternatives 
would  not  harvest  such  a large  percentage  of  any  of  the  drainages  The 
highest  percentage  of  any  drainage  harvested  would  be  14.3  percent  under 
Alternative  4 which  is  well  below  the  20  percent  threshold  identified  in 
hydrologic  research. 

4 .  SEDIMTNT  LEVELS 


The  Forest  Planning  process  identified  a Gtream  substrate  sediment  level 
of  37.1  percent  fines  a6  that  which  would  limit  resident  trout  populations  to 
a minimum  viable  level.  At  that  same  time  a substrate  sediment  level  of 
approximately  18.5  percent  fines  was  identified  as  that  of  maximum  resident 
fisheries  habitat  potential.  (See  Forest  Land  and  Resource  Management  Flan 
for  the  Salmon  National  Forest,  pp  11-22,  11-23.)  A resident  fisheries 
habitat  management  standard  of  28.7  percent  fine6  was  ultimately  adopted  in 
the  Forest  Plan  to  mirror  State  production  goals  for  these  stocks. 

Pre-pro}ect  monitoring  within  the  Woodtick  Creek  drainage  indicates  that 
substrate  sediment  levels  in  this  6tream  are  among  the  lowest  of  Forest 
streams  measured  to  date.  Core  sampling  of  the  spawning  gravels  of  upper 
Woodtick  Creek  during  September  1993  revealed  a mean  of  15.0  percent  fines, 
indicating  that  substrate  conditions  within  this  stream  currently  exceeding 
maximum,  habitat  potential. 

As  discussed  within  the  Hydrologry  Effects  section  in  Chapter  IV  of  the  FEIS, 
observations  of  results  of  similarly  designed  road  construction  and  timber 
harvest  actions  within  a similar  and  nearby  watershed  indicate  that  substrate 
sediment  levels  within  the  Woodtick  Creek  and  Moyer  Creek  drainages  would  be 
expected  to  remain  below  not  only  the  resident  fisheries  habitat  management 
standard  of  28.7  percent  fines,  but  additionally  below  the  20.0  percent 
anadromous  habitat  management  standard,  and  would  in  no  caae  be  expected  to 
ri6e  to  levels  which  would  threaten  the  viability  of  either  resident  or 
anadromous  stocks. 

5 .  WATER  MONITORING 


The  results  of  sediment  yield  modeling  using  the  BOISED  model  are  included  in 
the  FEIS,  Chapter  IV  includes  a description  of  the  BOISED  sediment  yield 
model,  and  the  results  of  the  modeling  by  alternative. 


Caring  lor  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200-28M3  92) 


MOYER 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 5 


contain  an  analysis  of  water  yield  increases  and  assess  tlieir  contribution  to  sedimentation 
and  changing  flow  regimes. 

IV.  ELK  SECURITY  AND  HABITAT 

Alternatives  2 and  4 propose  massive  cutting  in  key  elk  summer  range.  Would  these 
nits  cause  cover  levels  to  drop  below  standards?  This  proposal  certainly  violates  the  Forest 
Service  recommendation  from  Elk  Habitat  Relationships  for  Central  Idaho.  Rather,  the 
proposed  action  will  degrade  summer  elk  habitat. 

New  roads  will  decrease  elk  security,  but  the  DEIS  fails  to  adequately  assess  the  effects 
of  increased  hunter  access. 

How  will  cattle  access  be  restricted  in  the  area?  The  FEIS  must  specify. 

V.  ALTERNATIVES 

Please  disclose  in  the  Final  EIS  the  most  recent  date  the  Forest  chose  the  no-action 
alternative  for  a project 

The  DEIS  presents  an  inadequate  range  of  alternatives: 

All  action  alternatives  propose  to  enter  the  Taylor  Mountain  inventoried  roadless 

area. 

All  action  alternatives  propose  even-aged  timber  management  We  request  that  the 
FEIS  consider  uneven-aged  management  as  a detailed  alternative. 

ll\e  range  of  harvest  levels  varies  from  3.75  to  6 9 MMBF,  and  road  construction 
levels  vary  from  116  to  17.8  miles.  Please  consider  in  detail  an  alternative  that  propses  less 
than  10  miles  of  roads  and  less  than  3 MMBF. 

VI.  TIMBER  HARVEST 

Several  of  the  proposed  clearculs  are  larger  than  40  acres,  the  regional  limit  on  the 
size  of  man-made  openings.  These  are  not  consistent  with  NEMA's  management 
requirements. 

VII.  THREATENED  AND  ENDANGERED  SPECIES 

All  federal  agencies  have  a strict  requirement  to  comply  with  the  Endangered  Species 
Act.  There  are  no  exceptions  (TVA  v.  Hill,  437  U.S.  at  173.  All  federal  agencies  must  give 
first  priority  to  the  conservation  and  recovery  of  listed  species  and  take  no  action  which 
threatens  their  continued  existence  (16  U.S.C.  Sec.  1536  (a)(1)&(2). 

Contrary  to  assertions  made  by  the  Forest  Service  and  Fish  and  Wildlife  Sendee, 
there  are  wolf  and  grizzly  bears  which  may  utilize  the  analysis  area.  lire  project  will 


,T  TIMBER  SALE 


Salmon  National 


Forest  Response 


G . MAIHTAIU  FISH  HABITAT 


Conclusions  reached  within  the  DEIS  regarding  expected  effect6  to  water 
quality  and  aquatic  habitats  are  based  upon  available  information, 
professional  experience  and  judgement,  and  related  research.  In  the  case  of 
the  proposed  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale,  the  Hydrology  Effects  section  of  the 
FEIS  discusses  the  hi  story , nature , and  effects  of  activities  within  a 
neighboring  watershed  of  similar  geologic  origin,  in  order  to  provide  a 
foundation  upon  which  conclusions  concerning  expected  effects  to  water 
quality  and  aquatic  habitat  within  the  Woodtick  Creek  and  Moyer  Creek 
watersheds  can  be  based.  A6  indicated  within  the  FEIS,  post - implementat ion 
aquatic  conditions  observed  within  the  Deep  Creek  drainage  with  road  design, 
layout  and  densities  similar  to,  or  exceeding  those  of,  the  proposed  Moyer 
Salt  action  alternatives  strengthen  the  conclusions  that  with  the  exception 
of  Alternative  3,  the  levels  of  timber  management  activity  proposed  within 
the  array  of  Moyer  Salt  action  alternatives  are  indeed  fully  compatible  with 
Forest  water  quality  and  aquatic  habitat  maintenance  goals  The  probable 
incompatibility  of  Alternative  3 with  water  quality  and  fisheries  resource 
goals  stems  from  an  si te - 6peci f ic  inability  to  effectively  implement,  within 
the  Salt  Creek  drainage,  those  same  mitigation  measures  which  have  been 
proven  successful  within  other  Forest  watersheds  in  protecting  and 
maintaining  aquatic  habitats. 

Pre - implementat ion  substrate  core  sampling  operations  on  Woodtick  Creek,  and 
post - implementat ion  core  sampling  operations  on  Deep  Creek,  have  indicated 
that  substrate  conditions  currently  exceed  maximum  habitat  potential  on  both 
streams.  Although  lab  analysis  of  macroinvertebrateG  is  not  yet  complete, 
cursory  observations  have  shown  no  discernible  difference  in  diversity  or 
vigor  between  pre-project  Woodtick  Creek  populations  and  post  - impl ementa t i on 
Deep  Creek  populations.  Given  the  current  condition  of  substrate  quality 
within  the  Moyer  Salt  analysis  area,  and  the  observed  post  - implementat ion 
conditions  within  the  Deep  Creek  drainage,  there  is  little  evidence  to 
suggest  that  macroinvertebrate  or  vertebrate  aquatic  resources  would  be 
adversely  impacted  as  a result  of  implementation  of  action  Alternatives  2. 
2A,  4,  5,  or  6.  Additional  analysis  of  Alternative  3 beyond  that  included 
within  the  DEIS,  has  identified  an  high  ri6k  of  surface  erosion  and  sediment 
impacts  within  the  Salt  Creek  drainage,  and  a consequent  risk  to  existing 
macroinvertebrate  and  vertebrate  aquatic  species. 

7 . INCONSISTENCY  WITH  FOREST  SERVICE  POLICY  REGARDING  CUTTING  TIMBER 
IN  KESR 


The  document,  °Elk  Habitat  Relationships  for  Central  Idaho",  contains  good 
information  concerning  management  of  elk  habitat.  Portions  of  this  document 
were  adopted  in  the  Forest  Plan.  These  management  standards  and  guidelines 
help  accomplish  specific  goals  in  areas  that  received  "Key  Elk"  (4A  or  4B) 
management  prescriptions  in  the  Forest  Plan. 


Our  particular  timber  sale, 
received  3A  anadromous  fish 
management  prescriptions  in 


however,  contains  cutting  unit6  within  areas  that 
haJbitat  prescriptions  and  5A,  5B  and  5C  timber 
the  Forest  Plan,  iather  than  the  "Key  Elk' 


Caring  tor  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS  6200-28b(3'92) 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 5 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


certainly  have  a detrimental  effect  on  these  species  and  their  habitat.  We  feel  that  the 
biological  asessment  is  incorrect  in  its  findings,  and  we  believe  the  Forest  Service  is 
required  to  enter  into  formal  consultation  with  the  l)S  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service. 

Roads  play  a critical  limiting  factor  on  gray  wolf  recovery  efforts.  Thiel  (1985)  found 
that  wolves  fail  to  exist  in  areas  with  open  road  densities  even  as  low  as  0 93.  Mattson  and 
Knight  (1991)  found  that  even  secondary  roads  present  a mortality  risk  to  grizzly  bears  five 
times  that  of  roadless  backcountry  areas.  Proper  consideration  of  the  relevant  factors  will 
clearly  lead  to  a 'may  effect"  situation. 

VIII.  Ol  n GROWTH  AND  OI  D GROWTH  DEPENDENT  SPECIES 

14 


15 


These  comments  are  not  meant  to  be  exhaustive.  Tire  Forest  Service  must  comply 
with  all  existing  laws  and  regulations  as  well  as  addressing  public  concerns.  We  thank  you 
for  tire  opportunity  to  comment 


Tire  DEIS  fails  to  disclose  tire  amount  and  location  of  the  proposed  harvest  of  old 
growth.  It  also  fails  to  divulge  any  detail  of  how  old  growth  was  defined,  and  what  the 
relative  contribution  of  identification  methods  such  as  aerial  plrotograplis,  field  surveys, 
and  data  queries  was.  This  information  Dtust  be  disclosed. 

lire  DEIS  fails  to  examine  tire  role  and  importance  of  the  area,  and  especially  the 
importance  of  existing  stands  of  old  growth,  in  providing  potential  biological  corridors  for 
wildlife  movements. 


Dan  Funsch 
program  assistant 


prescript  ions  . Any  selected  action  alternative,  however,  would  meet  Forest 
Plan  Wildlife  Standards  and  Guidelines  for  wildlife  prescriptions. 

8 . WILDLIFE  SECURITY 

You  are  correct  in  stating  that  new  roads  will  decrease  elk  security. 
Post-sale  road  density  was  one  of  the  factors  used  to  predict  changes  in 
EHP . However,  the  hunting  aspect  of  elk  security  cannot  be  adequately 
addressed  on  thi6  or  any  other  area  due  to  the  various  parameters  that  affect 
hunter  access  and  success  such  as  season  length  and  timing.  The  roads 
constructed  under  any  action  alternative  in  this  proposal  will  be 
administratively  closed  via  locked  gates  and  the  distance  into  the  proposed 
area  will  definitely  limit  access  by  persons  on  foot. 

9 . RESTRICTION  OF  LIVESTOCK  WITH  FENCES  AND  CATTLEGUARDS 

We  are  committed  to  install  cattleguards  on  new  roads  whenever  they  cross  an 
existing  fence.  There  are  presently  no  fences  in  the  Moyer  Salt  analysis 
area,  so  we  have  not  planned  any  cattleguards  on  the  roads 

When  the  Forest  Plan  was  developed,  grazing  allotments,  wildlife  boundaries, 
and  forage  production  capabilities  were  used  to  establish  livestock  grazing 
limits  at  levels  to  prevent  livestock/wildlife  conflicts.  By  increasing  the 
available  area  within  a given  allotment  with  the  same  number  of  cattle,  the 
result  is  a dispersal  of  livestock.  This  reduces  concentrated  use  in  a 
specific  area  and  thu6  improves  the  general  range  condition,  resulting  in 
better  habitat  for  both  the  livestock  and  wildlife.  The  key  elk  summer  range 
areas  are  not  given  special  consideration.  Animal  unit6  per  month  (AUM'6) 
per  allotment  will  not  increase  as  a result  of  this  timber  sale. 

10 . SELECTION  OF  A NO  ACTION  ALTERNATIVE 

The  Salmon  National  Forest  has  no  record  of  ever  selecting  a no  action 
alternative  in  any  Final  Environmental  Impact  Statement. 

11 . UNEVEN -AGED  MANAGEMENT  AS  A DETAILED  ALTERNATIVE 

The  Draft  EIS,  on  page  2-2,  includes  our  rationale  for  not  proposing 
uneven-aged  management.  In  the  lodaepole  community,  the  presence  of  heavy 
fuels  make  it  a physical  impossibility.  Even  when  it  is  possible  to  skid 
logs  and  save  a residual  stand,  it  is  often  not  possible  to  dispose  of  the 
slash  without  clearcutt ing . 

Two  alternatives  were  developed  in  response  to  general  concerns  about 
standard  clearcutting  within  the  lodgepole  community.  Alternatives  6 and  2A 
would  utilize  clearcutting  with  islands  in  order  to  better  meet  visual 
quality  objectives  and  maintain  habitat  for  other  resources  dependant  upon 
structural  diversity.  Where  clearcutting  is  prescribed,  many  of  the  stands 
would  have  approximately  15  percent  of  the  area  within  the  unit  left  in  uncut 
islands  ranging  from  1/2  an  acre  to  one  acre  in  size.  With  heavy  fuel 
loadings,  such  as  those  found  in  the  analysis  area,  the  retention  of  i6land6 


Caring  lor  Ihe  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-62Pn  2Pb(3  92) 


MOYER  SALT  TIHISER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  U 5 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


Mr.  Funsch 


is  the  only  practical  and  economically  feasible  alternative  to  standard 
clearcutting . 


Harvest  treatments  prescribed  for  stands  within  the  Douglas-fir  community 
were  expanded  to  include  the  modified  irregular  shelterwood  system.  This 
system  perpetuates  or  creates  from  two  to  four  age  groups  and  canopy  levels 
The  concept  of  the  irregular  shelterwood  system  is  to  mimic  natures  natural 
reproduction  system.  The  end  result  is  a diversified  stand  structure  which 
maintains  a forested  appearance  and  provides  vertical  diversity  through 
multiple  canopy  layers. 


12 .  HEW  ALTERNATIVE  • WITH  LESS  THAN  10  MILES  OF  ROAD  AND  3 MHBF 


After  receiving  your  request  for  an  alternative  with  less  than  10  mile6  of 
road  and  the  harvest  of  les6  than  3 MMBF,  we  developed  a new  alternative 
(Alternative  5) . This  alternative  proposes  the  use  of  helicopters,  1.1  mile6 
of  new  road6  and  the  harvest  of  1.79  MMBF. 


13 . THREATENED  AND  ENDANGERED  SPECIES 

There  are  no  documented  or  undocumented  observations  of  gray  wolve6  or 
grizzly  bears  in  this  project  area.  The  original  Species  List,  supplied  by 
the  USFWS  on  January  29.  1991,  did  not  contain  any  listed  or  proposed 
species.  However,  when  this  list  was  updated  on  March  31,  1993,  the 
endangered  gray  wolf  was  placed  on  the  list.  At  that  time  a new  Biological 
Assessment  was  prepared  which  determined  that  the  proposed  action  "may  affect 
but  is  not  likely  to  adversely  affect"  the  gray  wolf,  wolf  habitat  or 
recovery  potential . This  determination  was  based  primarily  on  predicted 
effects  on  prey  populations,  post-6ale  motorized  travel  restrictions  on  the 
new  road  system,  mitigation  measures  that  rendered  a section  of  the  new  road 
system  unsuitable  for  human  traffic  by  foot  or  horse,  and  a post-sale  open 
road  density  of  0.56  mi/6guare  mile  subsequently  concurred  with  that 
determination  thus  no  further  informal  or  formal  consultation  i6  required  for 
thi6  project. 

14 . OLD  GROWTH 

Information  on  old  growth  can  be  found  in  Chapter  III  and  IV  of  the  FEIS 
under  the  Biological  Diversity  6ection6  - unique  habitats  We  have  included 
a map  of  the  old  growth  retention  stands  which  will  be  left  uncut  (Figure 
III-3)  in  the  Final  EIS.  The  various  alternative  maps  show  the  cutting  unit 
locations,  which  were  identified  by  aerial  photography  and  ground  truthing. 
Alternative  4 which  harvests  the  most  old  growth  would  show  a 15  percent 
reduction  in  acre6  with  old  growth  characteristics.  The  definition  of 
old-growth  habitat  found  in  the  Glossary  states  that  it  is  habitat  for 
certain  wildlife  that  is  characterized  by  overmature  coniferous  forest  stands 
with  large  snag6  and  decaying  log6 . 

15 . BIOLOGICAL  DIVERSITY 

We  have  included  additional  discussion  of  biological  diversity  in  the  Final 
EIS.  Information  on  biological  corridors  can  be  found  in  Chapter  IV  under 


Caring  for  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200- 28b(  3/92) 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 5 


Salmon  national  Forest  Response 


Mr.  Funsch  6. 

Biological  Diversity  and  also  in  Appendix  H.  We  have  made  our  beBt  attempt 
at  discussing  biological  diversity  of  this  area  by  using  the  most  recent 
literature  and  scientific  information.  Please  review  these  sections  of  the 
Final  EIS.  If  you  still  have  questions  concerning  the  biological  diversity 
discussion,  let  us  know  within  30  days. 

Alternative  6 has  been  listed  be  the  " PREFERRED*  Alternative  in  the  Final 
EIS.  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected*  Alternative  but  will  do  bo  in  the 
Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review.  Please  have 
your  comments  back  to  us  in  30  days. 

Sincerely, 


JOHN  E.  BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


Caring  for  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200-28M3/92) 


MOYER 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 6 


Post  Office  Box  604 
Salmon,  Idaho  83467 
August  6,  199? 


John  Burns,  Supervisor 
Salmon  National  Forest 
P O Box  7?9 
Salmon,  Idaho  89467 


2 

3 

4 

5 


We  wish  to  comment  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  in  the  Panther  Creek 
drainage  When  my  husband,  a hunter,  heard  of  the  sale,  he  decided  that 
it  was  one  which  we  should  look  into.  We  would  urge  you  to  choose 
Alternative  3,  which  we  feel  responds  to  the  concerns  of  the  large 
population  of  elk  which  uses  a substantial  area  of  centrally  located  land 
within  the  sale  as  key  elk  summer  range.  This  area  is  a well  known  elk 
area,  and  we  feel  that  to  log  this  area  would  cause  the  elk  population 
much  devastation.  Alernatives  ? and  4 seem  to  violate  what  the  Forest 
Service  reccommends  concerning  key  elk  habitats,  the  60  40  ratio. 

We  understand  that  Alternative  3 restricts  timber  harvest  to  the  west 
and  east  sides  of  the  analysis  area,  which  are  in  the  Taylor  Mountain 
Roadless  Area  We  know  that  to  harvest  in  a roadless  area  results  in  an 
* irr ivcrsible  and  irretrievable  committment * to  further  develop  those 
areas.  We  ask  you  to  seriously  consider  the  future  cumulative  effects 
which  come  into  play  when  77  plus  new  miles  of  roads  are  constructed  under 
Alternative  3 We  would  highly  suggest  that  fences  and  cattleguards  are 
constructed  as  needed  on  the  roads  that  will  encircle  the  elk  summer  range 
area.  We  also  reccommend  that  the  Moyer  Peak  Jeep  Trail  be  closed  in 
section  15.  We  also  are  concerned  that  sufficient  area  be  allotted  to 
ouiintain  good  habitat  and  travel  corridors  for  the  elk  after  activity  is  • 
tpmpletcd . 

We  reject  Alternatives  7 and  4 because  we  feel  that  they  do  no  meet 
lour re  objectives  for  other  resources . Only  Alternative  3 takes  into 
consideration  the  necessary  points  that  we  have  previously  mentioned. 


Action  Q 


2 3 4 5 6 
2 3 * 

2 3 4 5 6 
2 3 4 5 6 
2 3 4 5 6 


Sincere  1 y , 
Doug  Sholes 


Karen  Sholes 


TIMBER  SALE 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


United  StateB 
Department  of 
Agriculture 


Forest 

Service 


Salmon 

National 

Forest 


P.0.  Box  729 
Salmon,  ID  83467 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date  : 


Doug  and  Karen  Sholes 
P.0  Box  604 
Salmon,  ID  83467 


Dear  Mr.  and  Mrs.  Sholes: 

Thank  you  for  your  comments  of  August  6,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale 
Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis  process  and 
have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource  specialists.  Their 
ideas  are  the  basi6  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and  comprise  the  rest 
of  this  letter. 

1 . MAINTAIN  WILDLIFE  HABITAT 

All  proposed  action  alternatives  will  decrease  the  cover  to  forage  ratio  in 
Wildlife  Analysis  Area  I which  is  already  below  the  optimum  value  of  40:60. 
However,  these  same  alternatives  will  increase  the  forage  component  of  the 
habitat  in  the  currently  forage  limiting  Wildlife  Analysis  Area  II.  The 
overall  results  will  be  very  near  neutral  or  no  significant  change  from  the 
current  situation. 

2 . ELK  WALLOWS 

Some  of  the  isolated  wetlands  are  associated  with  elk  wallows.  The  only  ones 
that  will  be  impacted  are  those  that  the  road  will  cross.  Wet  areas  within 
proposed  cutting  Units  25  and  S14  will  be  flagged  so  that  surface  disturbance 
of  these  wet  areas  will  be  avoided.  (See  Chapter  II,  Wetlands  Mitigation  in 
the  FEIS.)  Elk  wallow  complexes  are  numerous  in  the  analysis  area  and  are 
not  considered  to  be  a limiting  factor  for  elk  habitat. 

3 . RESTRICTION  OF  LIVESTOCK  WITH  FENCES  AND  CATTLEGUARDS 

We  are  committed  to  install  cattleguards  on  new  roads  whenever  they  cross  an 
existing  fence.  There  are  presently  no  fenceB  in  the  Moyer  Salt  analysis 
area,  so  we  have  not  planned  any  cattleguards  on  the  roads. 

When  the  Forest  Plan  was  developed,  grazing  allotments,  wildlife  boundaries, 
and  forage  production  capabilities  were  used  to  establish  livestock  grazing 
limits  at  levels  to  prevent  livestock/wildlife  conflicts.  By  increasing  the 


Caring  (or  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200-28bl3/92) 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 6 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


Doug  and  Karen  ScoleB 


2 . 


available  area  within  a given  allotment  with  the  same  number  of  cattle,  the 
result  iG  a diepersal  of  livestock.  This  reduces  concentrated  use  in  a 
Gpecific  area  and  thus  improves  the  general  range  condition,  resulting  in 
better  habitat  for  both  the  livestock  and  wildlife.  The  key  elk  summer  range 
areas  are  not  given  special  consideration.  Animal  units  per  month  (AUM's) 
per  allotment  will  not  increase  as  a result  of  this  timber  sale 

4 . CLOSURE  OF  THE  MOYEP-  PEAK  JEEP  TRAIL 

The  Moyer  Peak  Jeep  Trail  (£6202)  would  remain  open  for  historical  access, 
except  for  the  spur  road  just  west  of  Moyer  Peak  in  the  SE1/4NW1/4  of 
Section  16.  This  spur  road  will  be  closed  by  creating  an  earthen  barrier 
that  prevents  vehicle  access. 

5 . TRAVEL  CORRIDORS 

As  stated  in  Chapter  IV,  elk  habitat  potential  will  increase  in  wildlife 
Analysis  Area  II  but  will  decrease  in  Area  1.  The  resulting  post-sale  elk 
habitat  potential  will  be  very  nearly  the  same  as  current.  Uncut  timber 
between  harvest  units,  riparian  areas  and  unmanaged  acres  will  provide 
sufficient  timbered  travel  corridors  to  facilitate  elk  use  of  the  entire 
area  . 

Alternative  6 has  been  listed  as  the  "PREFERRED*  Alternative  in  the  Final 
EIS  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  “Selected"  Alternative  but  will  do  so  in  the 
Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review.  Flease  have 
your  comments  back  to  us  in  30  days. 

Sincerely, 


JOHN  E . BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


Caring  for  fhe  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200-28b(3  921 


MOYER  SALT 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 7 


'~f  e.Oi  7cA- 
B<x™r,  H>«iT  S^vu.scr  y 
V =/— * 


a— — — — » 

\-£C£<i  Vt(l\.j  A/vi-jc  xi — ^ ( 

, top  eaU. 

>v  'r"“:4r- 

ill  k 

UUti^ -1- 


{ Vu _ | 

:J ' 

t'U r1 -U.— ' e -l  .5-^UJ  *JLcLjL4v1^x^ 

aVv7;^  j&k-  ^u  ct}  . 

J rwf, ^A^U_-- 

\>  /m  AnAAA^-Md^-^A. — —-r—  “7““”^  Zd 

^xxA^-Oy^-e^ .-„.r  . 

eWfc?u_  C5Y^S|-L__J7^0  cJ-<1--  m 


SALE 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


United  States 
Department  of 
Agriculture 


Forest 

Service 


Salmon 

National 

Forest 


P.0  Box  729 
Salmon,  ID  83467 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date  : 


Toby  Friedman 
P.O.  Box  8 

Gibbonsvi 1 1 e , ID  B3463 


Dear  Ms.  Friedman: 

Thank  you  for  your  comments  of  February  6,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber 
Sale.  Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis 
process  and  have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource 
specialists.  Their  ideas  are  the  baBis  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and 
comprise  the  rest  of  thi6  letter. 

1 • MAINTAIN  WILDLIFE  HABITAT 

During  the  Forest  planning  process,  all  areas  of  key  elk  summer  range  on  thi6 
Forest  were  mapped  A portion  of  these  areas  were  then  selected  to  receive 
a 4 B Management  Area  Prescription  which  places  management  emphasis  first  and 
foremost  on  elk  habitat  objectives.  The  amount  of  acres  given  the  4B 
prescription  was  sufficiently  large  to  provide  necessary  core  areas  for  elk 
which  in  combination  with  surrounding  areas  would  support  target  population 
established  in  the  Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game  Species  Management  Plan 
for  elk. 

2 . INCONSISTENCY  WITH  FOREST  SERVICE  POLICY  REGARDING  CUTTING  TIMBER 
IN  KESR 

"Key  Elk"  (4A  or  4B)  management  prescriptions  in  the  Forest  Plan  emphasire 
management  of  big  game  habitat  in  winter  and  summer  ranges.  Our  particular 
timber  sale  contains  cutting  units  within  areas  that  received  3A  anadromous 
fish  habitat  prescriptions  and  5A,  5B  and  5C  timber  management  prescription 
in  the  Forest  Plan,  not  the  "Key  Elk"  prescriptions. 

Any  selected  action  alternative,  however,  would  meet  Forest  Plan  Wildlife 
Standards  and  Guidelines  for  wildlife  prescriptions. 


Caring  for  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200-28b(3'92) 


MOYER 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 7 


-2.- 

U -‘'"7  ...  (,•>.•» 

M Ou1  IjK.  _ . -fn  cJ*L, 


rf 


r{v#ujg 


L 


/ 


i-t /rt'isL.erajf L. 

7-C^b-« — 

IS- 


rjo  — CjScr^e — 

I'LL*-* 


'i'M'  ^ _.. 


v^Wx 


_^xr<ox^,erv\- 1 5” 


AAX- 


dhr— 

aj£Lo/” 

v~<  _ (a  _ « °lt 


rfa^iW. 

(&_«_ ^ -VV  . 


.^eji^va < 

\-vx  I /n_s~__  o bzt_  cb  ^ 

bioo  cji | ^ ft  q_. «J21 J^L*X  — rfa  ^ _ . 

Al^wf  j A^r\  __  _ chk_  [Lws>  WT_  ■b 

LlV4C4ivpil_c^^_  C^vJiA^t^^<4vv^^  _ l \)aJLA-^JL 

&[cLjLk\}^-){juM  L a)  Cup, 

— Lo ^ — bf/Lcf— ly  &u_^u/aJIj£ — ^ 

'\'(xk^i OlQ^u.— (L$\y  

_W>Luj  sftAu.  L.l\  f : 

vi>1  I 


( Q .Aj  (7; 


,T  TIMBER  SALE 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


Toby  Friedman  2. 

3 . RESTRICTION  OF  LIVESTOCK  WITH  FENCES  AND  CATTLE GUARDS 

We  are  committed  to  install  cattleguards  on  new  roads  whenever  they  cross  an 
existing  fence.  There  are  presently  no  fences  in  the  Moyer  Salt  analysis 
area,  so  we  have  not  planned  any  cattleguards  on  the  roads. 

When  the  Forest  Plan  was  developed,  grazing  allotments,  wildlife  boundaries, 
and  forage  production  capabilities  were  used  to  establish  livestock  grazing 
limits  at  levels  to  prevent  livestock/wildlife  conflicts.  By  increasing  the 
available  area  within  a given  allotment  with  the  same  number  of  cattle,  the 
result  i 6 a dispersal  of  livestock.  This  reduces  concentrated  use  in  a 
specific  area  and  thus  improves  the  general  range  condition,  resulting  in 
better  habitat  for  both  the  livestock  and  wildlife.  The  key  elk  summer  range 
areas  are  not  given  special  consideration.  Animal  units  per  month  (AUM's) 
per  allotment  will  not  increase  aB  a result  of  thi6  timber  sale. 

4 . CLOSURE  OF  THE  MOYER  PEAK  JEEP  TRAIL 

The  Moyer  Peak  Jeep  Trail  (#6202)  would  remain  open  for  historical  access, 
except  for  the  spur  road  just  west  of  Moyer  Peak  in  the  SE1/4NW1/4  of 
Section  16.  This  spur  road  will  be  closed  by  creating  an  earthen  barrier 
that  prevents  vehicle  access. 

Alternative  6 has  been  listed  as  the  "PREFERRED*  Alternative  in  the  Final 
EIS.  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected"  Alternative  but  will  do  sc  in  the 
Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review.  Please  have 
your  comments  back  to  us  in  30  days. 

Sincerely, 


JOHN  E BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


Caring  lor  the  LBnd  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200-2Sb(3  o 


MOYER  SALT 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 8 


0Dn("'-§-{Vi/  

sW 


■'I 


& ( rritfJ  I Q?H'Q-Ll[.}V6 


“VI 

S’.  5 • 


'Vr 

• — ASIO’92-— 

_ Into  Q Adton  □ 

SUP 

• up  TTTV7770 

■TAF—  1 2 3 4 5y- 

fill  1 2 3 4 5 9 

WIWW-  1 2 3 4 3 9- 

AO  1 _ 2_  3 4 5 g 

CCiTOl. 


;:i-_ — tr^~ 

| i th/ro  /-*  y /v>rj  l ^sr  re_ 

/?  c TlvV  Of^lrJ  — Z1  /C4^(  fnhiP f3  Fr  4 /3?t  p ! P 7^Vf/?<f 


ieff(A/n  y A°^iir  t^~o 


_T w,f  f _ 5</- 

FyVffA/  ^(Ji7 

kQ&/lD_ 2 <4 ZV/tL 

!%■?>  o? s.44.r  T/^oat  sa-i(  h.k 13  ar->  oo+'f  v^/ry 


L$.AiTtf<l£nVtS  TMAr  ‘A  F Ttif  ArfAnATK'tid  L_ 

I . - • 


■a  , 

;:;  f (f(rr>_;a  rJ  uu  on  fit  - r sPvc/avi  y z j /c 

i'i  ^ x 

J:j THl  S 5/A7U  6/) C/fOc>sc  7?r  ( t. TT/e.-JAnv r ,»  •? 

{THAT. 'has  Thf  l f,tiT  o*j  7?ft  cory^z/sHLy 

I'Af.funA  (lie  ^AAojl  W}*u/t  '5 

III  7 

l.U  y asr  /) fryQ. ^//  r (_ (o™.£  cTvfrJ  />\-o£s /-/cAy/l.  y 

!iU-JfiJ AFti/i dLvTiofynr/^zs w _ r^ogef]  > y^r.yj- 


1 

2 

3 


> p/^ iH/IFMAL ^ 0 ^A-AS O rJ 

lD 


0(  0 AS  /*u/c/f 

A 


/jjAfi  THir.  (S  Gym  t SArJR.uT o r c L j>s  / y> rxy 

! msrv  ,p<  ?. i JTr? Afft  c CJlTTLL £¥<(c 'atr/r^  (.x/-r_ 

J.Tlv T2l £ K-C  > ZLk 5 uc 1 r?A £ fcfrJGZ  z/tjul Q_$ l_ 

I ffci-J  tr/ftf)  


JlA’dA'y  y^Ay 


C’/yL^ 


nuic^r 

_j  9oo  TX>  y L .?/?  A',  a-v/7  J 

S'/Jrnc  H>'jfS//  ...  .Fir/#? 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


United  State6  Fore6t  Salmon  P.0.  Box  729 

\ Department  of  Service  National  Salmon,  ID  83467 

Agriculture  Forest 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date  : 


Erik  Fischer 
1900  Taylor  Ave  N 
Unit  J 

Seattle,  WA  98109 


Dear  Mr.  Fischer: 

Thank  you  for  your  comments  of  August  5.  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale 
Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis  process  and 
have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource  specialists  Their 
ideas  are  the  basis  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and  comprise  the  rest 
of  this  letter . 

1 . MAINTAIN  WILDLIFE  HABITAT 

The  quality  of  elk  habitat  in  the  Moyer-Salt  project  area  is  recognized 
throughout  the  Environmental  Impact  Statement  (EIS)  and  project  analyses  A 
list  of  nine  specific  wildlife  mitigation  measures  is  included  in  the  EIS, 
six  of  which  deal  with  minimizing  the  predicted  effects  of  thi6  project  on 
elk  habitat.  These  measures  range  from  protection  of  natural  ecotones  to 
placing  slash  on  a portion  of  the  closed  road  system  to  decrease  the  ease  of 
human  access . 

2 . CLOSURE  OF  THE  MOYER  PEAK  JEEP  TRAIL 

The  Moyer  Peak  Jeep  Trail  (#6202)  would  remain  open  for  historical  access, 
except  for  the  6pur  road  just  west  of  Moyer  Peak  in  the  SE1/4NW1/4  of 
Section  16.  This  spur  road  will  be  closed  by  creating  an  earthen  barrier 
that  prevents  vehicle  access. 

3 . RESTRICTION  OF  LIVESTOCK  WITH  FENCES  AND  CATTLE GUARDS 

We  are  committed  to  install  cattleguards  on  new  roads  whenever  they  crosE  an 
existing  fence.  There  are  presently  no  fences  in  the  Moyer  Salt  analysis 
area,  so  we  have  not  planned  any  cattleguards  on  the  roads. 

When  the  Forest  Plan  was  developed,  grazing  allotments,  wildlife  boundaries, 
and  forage  production  capabilities  were  used  to  establish  livestock  grazing 
limits  at  levels  to  prevent  livestock/wildlife  conflicts.  By  increasing  the 


Caring  lor  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS^OO-lSbO7* 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 8 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


Erik  Fischer  2 

available  area  within  a given  allotment  with  the  same  number  of  cattle,  the 
result  is  a dispersal  of  livestock.  This  reduces  concentrated  uae  in  a 
specific  area  and  thus  improves  the  general  range  condition,  resulting  in 
better  habitat  for  both  the  livestock  and  wildlife.  The  key  elk  summer  range 
areas  are  not  given  special  consideration.  Animal  units  per  month  (AUM's) 
per  allotment  will  not  increase  as  a result  of  thi6  timber  sale. 

Alternative  6 has  been  listed  as  the  "PREFERRED*  Alternative  in  the  Final 
EIS.  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected"  Alternative  but  will  do  so  in  the 
Record  of  Decision  which  will  follow  a 30-day  comment  period  after  release  of 
the  Final  EIS. 

Sincerely, 


JOHN  E . BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 


Caring  for  fhe  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200  2Rb(3^:i 


MOYER  SALT 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 9 


RUSSELL  E.  B LA  LACK,  M.S. 

1081  Milky  Wny 
Cupertino,  CA  95014. 

(408)  996-9750 


John  Burns,  Supervisor 
Salmon  National  Forest 
P.O.  Box  729 

Salmon,  ID  83467.  August  5th,  1992 

Dear  John  Burns 

re  : Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  DEIS 

My  name  is  Russell  Blalack.  I am  a designer  of  living  systems  incorporating  native  american 
perennials  into  existing  and  enhanced  habitats.  I spent  three  years  in  Idaho  doing  foundation 
work  for  my  current  project,  a computer-assisted  guide  to  native  plant  integration  in  living 
systems  design. 

I ask  you  to  consider  my  perspective  on  the  DEIS  recently  completed  by  your  office  for  a 
proposed  timber  sale  in  the  Panther  Creek  drainage  of  the  Cobalt  Rangei  District.  I note 

1 right  away  that  all  cutting  units  are  in  the  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area.  The  impact  of 

2 cutting  through  the  middle  of  a 3200  acre  tract  of  Key  Elk  Summer  Range  would  have  a 

devastating  impact  on  the  dk  herd.  It  also  violates  the  Forest  Service  recommendation  that 
"timber  harvest  on  key  elk  habitats  should  be  limited  to  those  activities  that  will  maintain  or 

3 enhance  the  habitat  for  that  particular  elk  use."  [Elk  Habiiai  Relationships  for  Central  Idaho] 

With  this  in  mind,  the  only  acceptable  action  alternative  must  be  Alternative  3,  which 

responds  to  the  wildlife  concerns  which  this  Timber  Sale  raises.  In  my  opinion,  the  No 

Action  alternative  is  the  wisest  choice,  bearing  in  mind  the  very  intense  wildlile  use  which 
the  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area  supports. 


Yours  ^sjpcerehy 

S'  \ RUSSELL  E.  BLALACK,  M.S. 

SALMON  N.  F, 

AUG  1 0 i?2 


(nfo  O 


Action  Q 


SALE 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


United  States 
Department  of 
Agriculture 


Forest 

Service 


Salmon 

National 

Forest 


P.O.  Box  729 
Salmon,  ID  83467 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date  : 


Russell  Blalack 
1081  Milky  Way 
Cupertino,  CA  95014 


Dear  Mr.  Blalack: 

Thank  you  for  your  comments  of  August  5,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale 
Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis  process  and 
have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource  specialists.  Their 
ideas  are  the  basis  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and  comprise  the  rest 
of  this  letter. 

1 . ROADLESS  CONCERNS 

As  indicated  in  the  Draft  Environmental  Impact  Statement  (EIS) , only  a 
portion  of  the  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area  would  be  affected  by  any  of  the 
action  alternatives.  As  currently  envisioned,  over  eighty  percent  of  the 
roadleB6  area  would  remain  undeveloped  into  the  foreseeable  future. 

2 . MAINTAIN  WILDLIFE  HABITAT 

Analyses  quantifying  post-sale  elk  habitat  conditions  were  completed  for  all 
alternatives  and  are  summarized  in  Table  IV-8  of  the  EIS  This  data 
indicates  a slight  increase  in  elk  habitat  potential  in  Area  II  and  a slight 
decrease  in  Area  I with  a net  result  very  near  current.  There  will,  however, 
be  a decrease  in  elk  habitat  security  and  an  increase  in  vulnerability  of 
hunted  elk.  However,  thi6  area  will  not  by  any  means  be  devastated  and  will 
remain  in  very  acceptable  elk  habitat  condition  post-6ale. 

3 . INCONSISTENCY  WITH  FOREST  SERVICE  POLICY  REGARDING  CUTTING  TIMBER 
IN  KESR 

The  document,  "Elk  Habitat  Relationships  for  Central  Idaho,"  contains  good 
information  concerning  management  of  elk  habitat.  Portions  of  this  document 
were  adopted  in  the  Forest  Plan.  These  management  standards  and  guidelines 
help  accomplish  specific  goals  in  areas  that  received  "Key  Elk"  (4A  or  4B) 
management  prescriptions  in  the  Forest  Plan. 


Caring  lor  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200-28b(3'Q2l 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 9 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


Russell  Blalack 


2 . 


Our  particular  timber  sale  however,  contains  cutting  units  within  areas  that 
received  3A  anadromous  fish  habitat  prescriptions  and  5A,  5B  and  5C  timber 
management  prescriptions  in  the  Forest  Plan,  rather  than  the  'Key  Elk* 
prescriptions.  Any  selected  action  alternative,  however,  would  meet  Forest 
Plan  Wildlife  Standards  and  Guidelines  for  wildlife  prescriptions 

Alternative  6 has  been  lieted  bb  the  "PREFERRED"  Alternative  in  the  Final 
EIS.  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected"  Alternative  but  will  do  so  in  the 
Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review.  Please  have 
your  comments  back  to  us  in  30  days. 

Sincerely, 


JOHN  E . BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


Caring  lor  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


rS-6200-28b(3'92> 


MOYER  SALT 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 10 


Aug.  8,  1992 


Dear  Mr.  Burns, 

This  letter  is  in  regard  to  the  Moyer-Salt  timber  sale.  I am  a long  time  resident  o( 
Salmon  and  am  very  familiar  with  this  area  I was  very  disappointed  to  hear  that 
logging  is  being  proposed  in  this  area 

1 The  Moyer-Salt  country  is  very  special  for  several  reasons;  it  is  one  of  the  few 
places  in  the  Salmon  National  Forest,  near  Salmon  that  has  remained  relatively 

2 roadless,  it  offers  excellent  habitat  for  elk  in  its  current  state,  and  it  also  supports 
a resident  band  of  Mountain  Goat,  not  many  of  which  are  left  in  this  area. 

It  logging  is  inevitable  here,  please  choose  an  alternative  that  will  cause  the 
least  impact  to  this  area  At  this  point  I feel  that  Alternative  3 is  a compromise. 
Under  this  plan  logging  will  be  allowed  on  the  least  sensitive  lands,  and  some 
of  the  higher  elevation  wildlile  habitat  will  be  protected.  All  of  the  area  identified 
o as  Key  Elk  Summer  Range,  and  those  areas  with  heavy  wildlife  use  should  be 
removed  from  the  timber  base  This  action  will  show  your  commitment  to  the 

4 economic  future  of  Salmon  by  foregoing  a short  term  profit  in  leiu  of  a more 
permanent,  far  sighted  plan. 

Please  limit  road  construction  as  much  as  possible.  Many  of  the  roads  that  the 
Forest  Service  has  allowed  for  mining  exploration  in  this  area  are  required  to  be 
low  impact  when  appropriate.  Perhaps  these  standards  could  apply  to  logging 

5 as  well.  Please  ensure  that  any  new  routes  will  be  closed  after  timber  harvest, 
including  the  jeep  trail  in  Section  15 

I sincerely  appreciate  your  solicitation  for  public  comment,  and  encourage  wise 
and  often  brave  decisions  on  this  matter. 


Thank  you, 


Terry  Myers 
Box  1006 

Salmon,  ID  83467 


SALMON  H F. 


/.;« 1 0 

Inlo  0 Action  Q 

SUP 

LMP  1 2 3 4 5 £ 

TAP  1 2 3 4 5 £ 

CLM  1 2 3 4 5 £ 

RRWW  1 2 3 4 5 £ 

AO  1 2 3 4 5 < 

CC's  TO: 


TIMBER  SALE 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


United  States 
Department  of 
Agr i cul ture 


Fore  Bt 
Service 


Salmon 

National 

Forest 


P.O.  Box  729 
Salmon,  ID  8 34  6"’ 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date  : 


Terry  Myers 
P.O  Box  1006 
Salmon,  ID  83467 


Dear  Ms . Myers : 

Thank  you  for  your  comments  of  August  5,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale 
Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis  process  and 
have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource  specialists  Their 
ideas  are  the  basis  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and  comprise  the  rest 
of  this  letter. 

1 . ROADLESS  CONCERNS 

As  indicated  in  the  Draft  Environmental  Impact  Statement  (EIS) , only  a 
portion  of  the  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area  would  be  affected  by  any  of  the 
action  alternatives.  As  currently  envisioned,  over  eighty  percent  of  the 
roadless  area  would  remain  undeveloped  into  the  foreseeable  future. 

2 . MAINTAIN  WILDLIFE  HABITAT 

Analyses  quantifying  post-sale  elk  habitat  conditions  were  completed  for  all 
alternatives  and  are  summarized  in  Table  IV-8  of  the  EIS.  This  data 
indicates  a slight  increase  in  elk  habitat  potential  in  Area  II  and  a slight 
decrease  in  Area  I with  a net  result  very  near  current.  There  will,  however, 
be  a decrease  in  elk  habitat  security  and  an  increase  in  vulnerability  of 
hunted  elk.  However,  thi6  area  will  not  by  any  means  be  devastated  and  will 
remain  in  very  acceptable  elk  habitat  condition  post-sale. 

3 . TRAVEL  CORRIDORS 

A 6 6tated  in  Chapter  IV,  elk  habitat  potential  will  increase  in  Wildlife 
Analysis  Area  II  but  will  decrease  in  Area  I.  The  resulting  post-6ale  elk 
habitat  potential  will  be  very  nearly  the  same  as  current.  Uncut  timber 
between  harvest  units,  riparian  areas  and  unmanaged  acres  will  provide 
sufficient  timbered  travel  corridors  to  facilitate  elk  use  of  the  entire 
area  . 

4 . COMMUNITY  STABILITY 

We  feel  that  timber  harvest  will  play  a key  role  in  the  economic  future  of 
Salmon.  The  demand  for  timber  from  the  Salmon  National  Forest  and  parts  of 
the  Cobalt  Ranger  District  has  been  strong  and  is  expected  to  increase  The 
economies  in  Lemhi  and  Custer  Counties  in  Idaho  and  Ravalli  County,  Montana, 
are  dependent  in  part  on  forest  resources,  particularly  on  the  renewable 


Msl 


Caring  lor  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200-28b(3/92) 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 10 


Salmon  National 


Forest  Response 


Terry  Myere 


natural  resources  of  grass,  timber,  and  water  (Lemhi  County  Report,  1990). 

One  objective  of  the  ForeBt  Plan  is  to  provide  timber  outputs  at  a level  that 
will  allow  the  continuation  of  industries  dependent  on  those  outputs  (Forest 
Flan,  1988,  III-4).  This  objective  will  provide  for  community  stability  in 
the  Fore6t'6  area  of  influence  and  is  consistent  with  the  customs  and  culture 
of  these  communities. 


5 . CLOSE  ALL  NEW  ROADS 

The  Cobalt  Ranger  District  will  gate  and  close  all  specified  road6  upon 
completion  of  road  construction.  The  Moyer  Salt  road  system  would  be 
included  in  the  Salmon  National  Forest  Travel  Plan  as  a yearlong  road 
closure . The  roads  would  remain  closed  except  during  active  periods  of  the 
sale  or  when  needed  for  post  6ale  activities,  administrative  purposes,  or 
periodic  firewood  gathering. 

Alternative  6 has  been  listed  as  the  "PREFERRED"  Alternative  in  the  Final 
EIS  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected"  Alternative  but  will  do  60  in  the 
Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review.  Please  have 
your  comments  back  to  us  in  30  days. 

Sincerely, 


JOHN  E BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


Caring  tor  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-62PO-28b(3'92) 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 11 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


fp  frjyVvLb  ? 


& flirt.  />  J.'A  < 

/lx  Tfrpfii  d/"  /Tl  QO  he,  t h / **i 

a ^ * X, J 7C, ' 74 

fZTPP  c’^rJL 

^lAtl  Iwhihtf  CU  c(o  /} I 2.  Jj  . 

, . „ i i /.  /A  _ P, A (S' C. 


MihJ-  po  1U^  .2  " y". 

r,yu.hsv^  hi.  (fisyu t yfy  ,J.r/^>c4<o{ 

C/*WKH  ^ „ 

■>cihHt’  csy  ^ ^Tf  i 'c^cu^fU'  yU<r»M 

!^dod*^ 

*-  <7— 

7 - 


United  States 
Department  of 
Agriculture 


Fore6t 

Service 


Salmon 
Nat ional 
Forest 


P.O.  Box  729 
Salmon,  ID  83467 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date  : 


Gene  Krebsbach 
E 1140  Crystal  Bay  Road 
Post  Falls,  ID  83854 


Mr.  Krebsbach: 

Thank  you  for  your  comments  of  August  6,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber 
Sale.  Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis 
process  and  have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource 
specialists.  Their  ideas  are  the  basis  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and 
comprise  the  rest  of  this  letter. 

1 . TRAVEL  CORRIDORS 

As  stated  in  Chapter  IV,  elk  habitat  potential  will  increase  in  wildlife 
Analysis  Area  II  but  will  decrease  in  Area  I.  The  resulting  po6t-sale  elk 
habitat  potential  will  be  very  nearly  the  same  as  current.  Uncut  timber 
between  harvest  units,  riparian  areas  and  unmanaged  acres  will  provide 
sufficient  timbered  travel  corridors  to  facilitate  elk  use  of  the  entire 
area  . 


2 . RESTRICTION  OF  LIVESTOCK  WITH  FENCES  AND  CATTLE GUARDS 

We  are  committed  to  install  cattleguards  on  new  roads  whenever  they  cross  an 
existing  fence.  There  are  presently  no  fences  in  the  Moyer  Salt  analysis 
area,  60  we  have  not  planned  any  cattleguard6  on  the  road6 . 

When  the  Forest  Plan  was  developed,  grazing  allotments,  wildlife  boundaries, 
and  forage  production  capabilities  were  used  to  establish  livestock  grazing 
limits  at  levels  to  prevent  livestock/wildlife  conflicts.  By  increasing  the 
available  area  within  a given  allotment  with  the  same  number  of  cattle,  the 
result  is  a dispersal  of  livestock.  This  reduces  concentrated  use  in  a 
specific  area  and  thus  improves  the  general  range  condition,  resulting  in 
better  habitat  for  both  the  livestock  and  wildlife.  The  key  elk  summer  range 
areas  are  not  given  special  consideration.  Animal  units  per  month  (AUM’ s) 
per  allotment  will  not  increase  as  a result  of  this  timber  sale. 

Alternative  6 ha6  been  listed  as  the  "PREFERRED"  Alternative  in  the  Final 
EIS.  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected"  Alternative  but  will  do  so  in  the 


Caring  lor  the  Land  and  Serving  People 

rS-6200-28b(3'92> 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public 


Comment  Letter  # 11 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


Gene  Krebsbach 


Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review.  Please  have 
your  comments  back  to  us  in  30  days. 

Sincerely, 


JOHN  E.  BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


Caring  lor  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200  28b(3'92) 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


iJj\°~/l  r<”<& 


rt» 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 12 

HC  |i  "2 v 3- 

I®  1 3 ~ £„<»*-  Jl*  nsJL  *»/*/ 

£ A^us't  ''iol2~- 

d 


Inlo  0 
SUP 

Action  P 

L HP  1 

l 2 

3 4 5 6 

1AF  | 

1 2 

3 4 5 6 

elm  : 

1 2 

3 4 5 6 

RRV/W  : 

1 2 

3 4 5 S 

AO 

l 2 

3 4 5 6 

CCtTO-  

fJL 


-/ML  Ust ~s  ~f t<.  ^ir.^oivL 


tue. 


7M 


/ 


&—i ; 

4 i>  /3  O'  i lL  cx<Lt«v  C 

St(4"  "Tty'Ll,,  be*  Let 

^ixtu-)  <4.  f « er  propoi^i 

/ncluj1^^  tk*.  £ (Lt  — *&.' 

iv,  *1-  “pr^/eV-  Ci-,at<r  -H'rtfcw^  Le<L5  «t~.  MB  lv  P.  -L,^  r _P~ 

*oJtL.  <u-.r«_  o F -<V.  <5l*~- J.’C.  .'^x.e'f  *-,  £&_  u s!l(  CaJs^fio  TJi.'i 

\>kiAj/  ^ f HI--I  fc^Lr  '/l,f  O^J.{ruc(f't3_^  -\hsxv-jj\_  YB  ary^  ^OC 


I ['■  f />  ^ ‘ S | . /*_■  T -4,  H b»p^ 

CietvL  l/."ota(^  H>rtlV  to-jj  )Ly  k—j  tlK  batx'L/j^  i^l\t 

1 Itiverf  ^ k^»,  ,fllC  (tt(a  7Yi,hKa  C<1 

ac-|)v^(c-S  rr<t(rJ%tjrs^  „ Mlc  LGH-tf-  Lr-  iUJl - ps,/-|fcuW  e\\-(  uJc  .* 

3 (>le.»<l0[Jl  U/|'fL  S-l3LJ.,(  p-.U^  '^fxM  |o  Cemt.j  .L-/|^ 

f"7c^  s-(«-  ^Ls  *v  ~.0P|;rc\  r«.sWs  Lc^f  b -/(«,  ^fj  ^4-  VJ> 

<*  ^ Le;.  ^ ^ J-  ^Ji  s«  s_x  * xW  „.U(±  Q5^ 

Sec,e;(  t..<  . m^blL  .S  v J«c-WA  „«^-(|  T/\  ,(Th.Ltt  U-f^ 

~L^(^>L,C  C/j^l^T.  fL,  ^<e,v./  if  A-lf  (t  ^ 

V^4f/J4tU«/  Lxz.  'Tpeetl^.t  <£\r  Xlkx^li^.  3 ;5  Hlc.ll 

J'irr  ^rs,f,K  ^ -r ^^,J- - .-^  p— jl  llux/  •.+•  su^ ^ 
r^K  uS^L  IU-,^  ;(7  fe.K  T^rl 

^ c ^ K^  H7~  L-o^  ^^c;r;^.  ^ jc-^urB 

^e.tec  cUs^-fU- V-ep  )-<(  ^ B U ^«JliJe_. 

/4,Vil  K“ty  ,tOrHl“*^3  rv£,rtt*Jt-  «f-fL<.^/U.Ur«,lt 

C4W>«-  ^'B-V  elK.  Tkt r«t«  XT  icu^iUr  O.H L*1  J14L- ^ jUM 

!°*~  a/,  \(c<L  (o  p«v«^i  iUs  occui 

MlLv-4f*t3  15.  <^<wi  ^ 7k<^b  ,,(1^;.  (_n, 

^i(<-  IL  ^ W;|itL  1,,  , J j 

Me.ojLuj^  ^m-rtBaKo  sUeleLte^.vAt.^BJ  0 B , j 

Tt^  h rt^y  $-?*  ^ ^ El(c  s^l,  bUc__  fL: 

I V-  l',vl)Ll'  WJQ  , C/ 


i>',VCc.i/«^  j C/jZd^  3.  gu 


*^7 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


United  StateB 
Department  of 
Agriculture 


Forest 

Service 


Salmon 

National 

Forest 


P.0.  Box  729 
Salmon,  ID  83467 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date : 


Terry  Benten 
HC  12 

P.0.  Box  273 

Coeur  d'  Alene,  ID  83814 


Dear  Mr  Benten: 

Thank  you  for  your  comments  of  August  6,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale 
Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis  process  and 
have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource  specialists.  Their 
ideas  are  the  basis  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and  comprise  the  rest 
of  this  letter. 

1 . MAINTAIN  WILDLIFE  HABITAT 

For  all  alternatives,  the  entire  road  system  constructed  for  thi6  6ale  will 
be  gated  and  administratively  closed  to  motorized  traffic.  In  addition,  the 
road  through  the  K£SR  will  have  slash  piled  on  it  to  discourage  and/or 
eliminate  human  travel  by  foot  or  horse.  This  will  negate  or  greatly 
decrease  any  predicted  effects  due  to  roading. 

2 . INCONSISTENCY  WITH  FOREST  SERVICE  POLICY  REGARDING  CUTTING  TIMBER 
IN  KESR 

"Key'  Elk"  (4A  or  4B)  management  prescriptions  in  the  Forest  Plan  emphasize 
management  of  big  game  habitat  in  winter  and  summer  ranges.  Our  particular 
timber  sale  contains  cutting  units  within  areas  that  received  3A  anadiocncuE 
fish  habitat  prescriptions  and  5A,  5B  and  5C  timber  management  prescription 
in  the  Forest  Plan,  not  the  "Key  Elk"  prescriptions. 

Any  selected  action  alternative,  however,  would  meet  Forest  Plan  Wildlife 
Standards  and  Guidelines  for  wildlife  prescriptions. 

3 . REMOVAL  OF  KESR  FROM  THE  TIMBER  BASE 

During  the  Forest  planning  process,  all  areas  of  key  elk  summer  range  on  thi6 
Forest  were  mapped  A portion  of  these  areas  were  then  selected  to  receive 
a 4 B Management  Area  Prescription  which  places  management  emphasis  first  and 
foremost  on  elk  habitat  objectives.  The  amount  of  acres  given  the  4B 


Caring  for  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200-28b(3/92) 


II 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public 


Comment  Letter  # 


12 


Salmon  National 


Forest  Response 


Terry  Benton 


prescription  was  sufficiently  large  to 
which,  in  combination  with  surrounding 
established  in  the  Idaho  Department  of 
for  elk. 


provide  necessary  core  areas  for  elk 
areas,  would  support  target  population 
Fi6h  and  Game  Species  Management  Plan 


4 PNV  COSTS 

Since  the  Draft  Environmental  Impact  Statement  (EIS) , we  have  analyzed  three 
additional  alternatives.  Alternative  6 now  ie  the  most  economically 
efficient  as  determined  by  the  calculation  of  present  net  value  (PNV) . (See 
Final  EIS.)  Due  to  the  variables  involved  in  performing  economic  analysis 
that  cover  lone  periods  of  time  (in  thi6  case  up  to  120  years) , the 
differences  in  PNV  between  the  alternatives  are  relatively  insignificant.  It 
is  interesting  to  note  that  alternatives  with  the  same  mix  of  silvicultural 
prescriptions  will  show  an  increasingly  negative  PNV  with  an  increase  in 
acres  when  stumpage  rates  are  somewhere  below  5100/mbf  (such  as  those  used  to 
calculate  the  long-term  average) . On  the  other  hand  a very  slight  increase 
in  stumpage  rates,  for  example  close  to  or  a little  over  5100/mbf  will  show 
the  opposite.  That  is,  with  an  increase  in  acres  the  PNV  will  be 
increasingly  positive.  Therefore  given  the  likelihood  of  a reduced  national 
timber  supply  and  increased  stumpage  values  it  i6  likely  that  alternatives 
which  harvest  the  most  acres  will  eventually  have  the  highest  PNV.  We  will, 
however,  consider  PNV  along  with  all  the  factors  and  resources  before 
choosing  the  final  course  of  action. 

5 . CLOSURE  OF  THE  MOYEP  PEAK  JEEP  TRAIL 

The  Moyer  Peak  Jeep  Trail  (86202)  would  remain  open  for  historical  access, 
except  for  the  spur  road  just  west  of  Moyer  Peak  in  the  SE1/4NW1/4  of 
Section  16.  This  spur  road  will  be  closed  by  creating  an  earthen  barrier 
that  prevents  vehicle  access. 

6 . RESTRICTION  OF  LIVESTOCK  WITH  FENCES  AirD  CATTLE GUARDS 


We  are  committed  to  install  cattleguard6  on  new  roads  whenever  they  cross  an 
existing  fence.  There  are  presently  no  fences  in  the  Moyer  Salt  analysis 
area,  so  we  have  not  planned  any  cattleguard6  on  the  roads. 

When  the  Forest  Plan  was  developed,  grazing  allotments,  wildlife  boundaries, 
and  forage  production  capabilities  were  used  to  establish  livestock  grazing 
limits  at  levels  to  prevent  livestock/wildlife  conflicts.  By  increasing  the 
available  area  within  a given  allotment  with  the  same  number  of  cattle,  the 
result  is  a dispersal  of  livestock.  This  reduces  concentrated  use  in  a 
specific  area  and  thus  improves  the  general  range  condition,  resulting  in 
better  habitat  for  both  the  livestock  and  wildlife.  The  key  elk  summer  range 
areas  are  not  given  special  consideration.  Animal  units  per  month  (AUM's) 
per  allotment  will  not  increase  as  a result  of  this  timber  sale 


Alternative  6 has  been  listed  as 
EIS.  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the 


the  "PREFERRED"  Alternative  in  the 
"Selected"  Alternative  but  will  do 


Final 
so  in  the 


Caring  (or  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200-28b(3'R2> 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 12 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


Terry  Benton 


Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review.  Please  have 
your  comments  back  to  us  in  30  days. 


Sincerely, 


JOHN  E . BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


Caring  lor  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200  28M3/92) 


MOYER  SALT 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 13 

August  8,  1992 

Proposed  Mover  Salt  Timber  Sale 


John  Burns,  Supervisor  " 

Salmon  National  Forest 
P.  0.  Box  729 
Salmon,  Idaho  83467 

Dear  John; 

I have  some  comments  on  your  recent  DEIS  for  a proposed 
timber  sale  in  the  Moyer  and  Salt  Creek  drainages  of  the 
Taylor  Mt.  Roadless  Area. 

Appendix  C of  the  1985  Salmon  National  Forest  Plan  says  that 
"This  area  contains  both  key  elk  summer  and  winter  range  for 
the  200-250  animals  in  the  Moyer  Creek  herd." 

Both  alternatives  2 and  4 in  the  DEIS  are  contrary  to  the 
goal  of  maintaining  or  enhancing  elk  habitat  on  key  ranges. 
Either  of  these  alternatives  would  adversely  impact  the  elk, 
so  you  should  select  neither. 

Alternative  3 would  have  less  impact  on  elk,  but  still 
involves  25  miles  of  new  and  reconstructed  road.  What  would 
be  the  proposed  road  funding  method?  I don't  understand  how 
we  can  afford  to  build  25  miles  of  forest  road  for  4 MMBF  of 
timber.  If  this  is  a "hard  money"  road,  then  I would  oppose 
this  alternative  also. 

If  there  is  any  timber  sale  in  this  area,  then  I would  hope 
you  would  close  any  new  roads  after  the  timber  is  cut,  for 
the  following  reasons: 

This  roadless  area  is  good  bear  habitat.  More  open 
roads  would  encourage  more  bear  hunting  and  more 
human  impacts  in  general,  something  the  bears  do 


not  need. 


SAlMOM  H.  F- 


Cattle  and  sheep  should  be  kept  out  of  areas  where 

they  are  not  currently  grazed.  An  open  road  will  f||Q  1 0 i’2 

create  demand  to  introduce  livestock. 


Into  0 

I definitely  oppose  alternatives  2 and  4.  If  the  sal^p 

appears  not  to  be  below  cost,  and  the  road  is  not  to  ih(? 
built  from  appropriated  funds,  then  I would  support  taf 
alternative  3.  ELM 


Act  i' 


Sincerely, 


RRY/W 
AO 


12  3 4 
12  3 4 
12  3 4 
12  3 4 
12  3 4 


CC's  TO:. 


Idaho  83402 


SALE 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


United  States  Forest 

Department  of  Service 

Agriculture 


Salmon  P.0.  Box  729 

National  Salmon,  ID  83467 

Forest 


Reply  to;  1950 
Date  : 


Jerry  Jayne 
1568  Lola  Street 
Idaho  Falla,  ID  83402 


Dear  Mr.  Jayne: 

Thank  you  for  your  comments  of  August  8,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale 
Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis  process  and 
have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource  specialists.  Their 
ideas  are  the  basis  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and  comprise  the  re6t 
of  this  letter. 

1 . INCONSISTENCY  WITH  FOREST  SERVICE  POLICY  REGARDING  CUTTING  TIMBER 
IN  KESR 

"Key  Elk"  (4A  or  4B)  management  prescriptions  in  the  Forest  Plan  emphasize 
management  of  big  game  habitat  in  winter  and  summer  ranges.  Our  particular 
timber  sale  contains  cutting  units  within  areas  that  received  3A  anadromous 
fish  habitat  prescriptions  and  5A,  5B  and  5C  timber  management  prescription 
in  the  Forest  Plan,  not  the  "Key  Elk"  prescriptions. 

Any  selected  action  alternative,  however,  would  meet  Forest  Plan  Wildlife 
Standards  and  Guidelines  for  wildlife  prescriptions. 

2 . FUNDING  FOR  ROADS 

All  road  construction  would  be  accomplished  under  the  timber  sale  contract. 
However,  we  will  request  supplemental  funds  to  help  pay  for  the  expensive 
construction  of  the  upper  Woodtick  Creek  crossing.  These  supplemental  funds 
come  from  the  US  Treasury'  but  they  differ  from  "hard  money"  in  that  if  the 
sale  is  "bid  up",  or  doe6  not  sell,  the  funds  return  to  the  Treasury'.  The 
proposed  9.3  miles  of  reconstruction  work  i6  relatively  inexpensive. 

3 . CLOSURE  OF  THE  MOYER  PEAK  JEEP  TRAIL 

The  Moyer  Peak  Jeep  Trail  (#6202)  would  remain  open  for  historical  access, 
except  for  the  spur  road  just  west  of  Moyer  Peak  in  the  SE1/4NW1/4  of 
Section  16.  This  spur  road  will  be  closed  by  creating  an  earthen  barrier 
that  prevents  vehicle  access. 


Caring  for  the  Land  pnd  Serving  People 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 13 


Salmon  National 


Forest  Response 


Jerry  Jayne 


4 . RESTP I CTION  OF  LIVESTOCK  WITH  FENCES  AND  CATTLEGUARDS 


We  are  committed 
existing  fence . 
area,  go  we  have 


to  install  cattleguards  on  new  roads  whenever  they  ciogb 
There  are  presently  no  fences  in  the  Moyer  Salt  analysis 
not  planned  any  cattleguards  on  the  roads 


When  the  Forest  Plan  was  developed,  grazing  allotments,  wildlife  boundaries 
and  forage  production  capabilities  were  used  to  establish  livestock  grazing 
limits  at  levels  to  prevent  livestock/wildlife  conflicts  By  increasing  the 
available  area  within  a given  allotment  with  the  same  number  of  cattle,  the 
result  is  a dispersal  of  livestock.  This  reduces  concentrated  use  in  a 
specific  area  and  thus  improves  the  general  range  condition,  resulting  in 
better  habitat  for  both  the  livestock  and  wildlife.  The  key  elk  summer  range 
areas  are  not  given  special  consideration  Animal  units  per  month  (AUM's) 
per  allotment  will  not  increase  a6  a result  of  this  timber  sale 


Alternative  6 has  been  listed  as  the 
EIS.  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Sel 
Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the 
your  comments  back  to  us  in  30  days. 


"PREFERRED*  Alternative  in 
ected"  Alternative  but  will 
Final  EIS  for  your  review 


the  Final 
do  so  in  the 
Please  have 


Sincerely, 


JOHN  E . BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


Caring  lor  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


fS-6200  -2f»bO  q:i 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 14 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


August  8,  1992 


United  States 
Department  of 
Agriculture 


Forest 

Service 


Salmon 

National 

Forest 


P.0.  Box  729 
Salmon,  ID  83467 


Dear  Mr.  Burns, 


I am  writting  in  regards  to  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber 
Sale,  after  reviewing  the  Draft  Environmental  Impact 
Statement,  I would  ask  you  to  choose  alternative  three. 
Alternative  three  would  protect  the  elk's  calving  and 
nursery  areas  the  best.  Half  ofthe  analysis  area  has 
been  mapped  as  key  elk  summer  range,  but  the  entire  area 
receives  heavy  spring,  summer,  and  fall  elk  and  mule  deer 
use.  This  area  needs  special  consideration  to  protect 
the  wildlife  resources  within  it.  Alternative  three 
would  also  protect  our  recreation  resources  in  the  Moyer 
Salt  area,  which  is  primarily  related  to  big  game 
hunting  in  the  fall. 

Your  DEIS  states  that  the  Moyer  Peak  Jeep  Trail 
(#6202)  will  be  closed  near  Moyer  Peak,  I would  ask  you 
to  close  the  jeep  trail  in  Section  15  to  be  most  effective. 

My  other  concern  is  that  the  newly  constructed 
roads  have  the  potential  of  bringing  cattle  into  the  area 
and  would  cause  conficts  with  the  elk.  Therfore  I ask 
that  fences  and  cattleguards  be  implemented  at  all 
critical  points  to  protect  our  wildlife  resources  in  this 
area . 


Sincerely , 

CI_ciudi<L 

Claudia  Whitten 
601  (Jeyman  St. 
Salmon  Id.  83467 

SALMON  N.  F, 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date  : 


Claudia  Whitten 
601  Neyman  Street 
Salmon,  ID  83467 


Dear  Ms.  Whitten: 

Thank  you  for  your  comments  of  August  8,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale 
Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis  process  and 
have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource  specialists.  Their 
ideas  are  the  basis  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and  comprise  the  rest 
of  this  letter. 

1 . MAINTAIN  WILDLIFE  HABITAT 

The  quality  of  elk  habitat  in  the  Moyer-Salt  project  area  is  recognized 
throughout  the  Environmental  Impact  Statement  (EIS)  and  project  analyses.  A 
list  of  nine  specific  wildlife  mitigation  measures  is  included  in  the  EIS, 
six  of  which  deal  with  minimizing  the  predicted  effects  of  thi6  project  on 
elk  habitat.  These  measures  range  from  protection  of  natural  ecotones  to 
placing  slash  on  a portion  of  the  closed  road  system  to  decrease  the  ease  of 
human  access. 

2 . CLOSURE  OF  THE  MOYEP  PEAK  JEEP  TRAIL 

The  Moyer  Peak  Jeep  Trail  (#6202)  would  remain  open  for  historical  access, 
except  for  the  spur  road  just  west  of  Moyer  Peak  in  the  SE1/4NW1/4  of 
Section  16.  This  spur  road  will  be  closed  by  creating  an  earthen  barrier 
that  prevents  vehicle  access. 

3 . RESTRICTION  OF  LIVESTOCK  WITH  FENCES  AND  CATTLEGUARDS 

We  are  committed  to  install  cattleguards  on  new  roads  whenever  they  cross  an 
existing  fence.  There  are  presently  no  fences  in  the  Moyer  Salt  analysis 
area,  so  we  have  not  planned  any  cattleguards  on  the  roads. 


/•if?  10  92 


Into  0 Action  Q 

SUP 

IMP  123456 

1AF  1 2 3 4 5 6 

ELM  1 2 3 4 5 6 

RRWW  123456 

AO  123456 


When  the  Forest  Plan  was  developed,  grazing  allotments,  wildlife  boundaries, 
and  forage  production  capabilities  were  used  to  establish  livestock  grazing 
limits  at  levels  to  prevent  livestock/wildlif e conflicts.  By  increasing  the 
available  area  within  a given  allotment  with  the  same  number  of  cattle,  the 


Caring  for  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200-28b(3'92) 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 14 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


Claudia  Whitten 


2 . 


result  is  a dispersal  of  livestock.  This  reduces  concentrated  use  in  a 
specific  area  and  thus  improves  the  general  range  condition,  resulting  in 
better  habitat  for  both  the  livestock  and  wildlife.  The  key  elk  summer  range 
areas  are  not  given  special  consideration.  Animal  units  per  month  (AUM's) 
per  allotment  will  not  increase  as  a result  of  this  timber  sale. 

Alternative  6 has  been  listed  as  the  "PREPERRED*  Alternative  in  the  Final 
EIS.  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected"  Alternative  but  will  do  so  in  the 
Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review  Please  have 
your  comments  back  to  ue  in  30  days. 

Sincerely, 


JOHN  E.  BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


Caring  for  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200-28b(3'92) 


r-T*rt7~T?r.i.  ■ . 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER 


Public  Comment  Letter  It  1.5 


t>u5  KiOrVV^  h|C6,o  ji  ,'-tc 

Sutanoi  llt-\  CA 

Auto'S T L|  IAAX  — 

SALMON  H F 

Aub!  j> 

hh  0 - ■ Action  q 

s;  i>> 

. IAt?_  1 2 3 4 6 6 

UF  1 2 3 4 5 6 

tlM  1 2 3 4 5 6 

- RRv-W  1 2 3 4 5 6 - - - 

li==LLl=4AJ  p JL 


CCrTO_ 


Sa\m^>n  NaVvonal  Pore6V 

5a  '•"Aeri  i LoLclVoo  93 Ht7 

tojlrt.noaea-U\  £x>abnaW 

. Ho4ep.5an.T5 

peo-r  ti|nn  8enne.-lf' 

— Pica*  Itnc  La.-vAturt  Hem  <-e-i|5oa5£.  . pd  ^ r, 

f,,’aUi  r'au'  fc^'  C,.,  pCrtc.o^\  o.eoUS 

l^cI  u^.ne..iVi_reoQrcIi^4l  jtf.*  _Hi^cr_  Sa  14  proper  A JT  5. 

Baovax \Ll^  , n-vL|  Ljl6LLJt>  ric^a  rcl, H^i6  pcopoia.1  (Lr^  H,  e 

' ’ ^ '**  blw  r~u  I4er>  you-_  oo  bc.+obfr  IX,  |*j8*j  durin/j  «. 

perii.«(;Lprop0i<A_€a|e4_rn_TOa^ltf*-,.  areas..  A5  J 

re  u,CMJt(J. _a!l_6a,Vj_T_C6A_Af.ft.t_t'rri<^5-V«--V<:A: . 

dral  len^l  tlS  on  ^ Mother  Sa  IT . m.  r\oa.cU  ci*  A r<?  a.  ^ I 3 C\0'X- 

\o-<  ( \of._  fhca^i  Lai  r5_  • 

At  I 100.5  ca+  .of.  Totoo^o.nd  mot  a b|tf To.  r£u,ao  yoar_rea]^ 

'K>e  " ^urPda+tfFTJHjL'J oTT_'Te  .Tci^-h  pF__Jla.U^  X_baoe,  onl^ 

Weo  __To _;WU_aptn _^£,  flroos.  fiF  M£nt  

- C^£  fa  1 ^--rA^ir>  V-V>^^4Te_5u ^ J ,£* ,-  nakufc  /f1y,,J_ 
\>5a  \Te—gt&rg_citi^.j.lei|_exp\a.i04^_Hort«»  -a  X , /j  ^ 5 J-.2 

k.?_ri^.&o  (U:?i.  i_I_Un  e o\  xjo^ca.  i.lu  _ prer-d.r  Alig.r  P_a+.  u c.  ~Nd__ 
5c.  Vue  ^ , 

- T\a^_  Fcrtm  Dxiorea  Vo^_X__p  rtfer_  ATb_L_-  WtJ.T  6_.are^._ 

SVwai  A—‘ :^-^-roo^ViiL5 10 ,*u3 _4_.p,r  JC  | e 6 5__ 

ftr£a  i._lu^atreq.cT^_ha.ue-_^340,£)oD^  v \es._oe__Fore.s+_Ser,/j«^ 

Cc-Q.d  ^ 1 — Ami  ,0,5.  \j  0 o^ — bia^oe- rrjc.a  Aro  ae.A.  iP  ycn  ^ £>  p 1 

UV.ih_.n)ad6_£ovy5e_  prcble-n^. 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


United  States  Forest  Salmon  P.0.  Box  729 

\ Department  of  Service  National  Salmon,  ID  83467 

Agriculture  Forest 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date  : 


Doris  Cole 

555  North  Roop  Street  #46 
Susanvi lie,  CA  96130 


Dear  Ms.  Cole: 

Thank  you  for  your  comments  of  August  10,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber 
Sale.  Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analy6i6 
process  and  have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource 
specialists.  Their  ideas  are  the  basis  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and 
comprise  the  rest  of  this  letter. 

1 . WILDERNESS  CONCERNS 

We  appreciate  your  concern  for  the  roadless  resource  and  we  would  simply 
point  out  that  under  any  of  the  action  alternatives,  over  eighty  percent  of 
the  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless  Area  would  remain  undeveloped  for  the 
foreseeable  future . 

2 . DISTURBANCES  FROM  TIMBER  HARVEST  ACTIVITIES 

It  is  true  that  timber  harvesting  activities  cause  ground  and  vegetative 
disturbances.  In  the  environmental  impact  statement  we  discuss  the  specific 
impacts  each  alternative  ha6  on  all  resources.  You  will  be  receiving  a copy 
of  the  Final  Environmental  Impact  Statement  (EIS)  so  you  can  review  our 
analysis  of  all  the  resources. 

3 . BIOLOGICAL  DIVERSITY 

We  have  included  additional  discussion  of  biological  diversity  in  the  Final 
(EIS),  both  in  Chapters  III  and  IV  and  additional  material  in  Appendix  H. 
Please  review  these  sections  of  the  Final  EIS.  We  have  made  our  best  attempt 
at  discussing  biological  diversity  of  this  area  by  using  the  most  recent 
literature  and  scientific  information.  If  you  still  have  questions 
concerning  the  biological  diversity  discussion,  let  U6  know  within  30  days. 

In  any  action  alternative,  we  would  be  directly  and  indirectly  affecting  the 
natural  integrity  within  specific  disturbance  areas  (roads  and  harvest 
units) . Thi6  would  not  exceed  16  percent  of  the  Taylor  Mountain  Roadless 


Caring  lor  Ihe  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200  2Rb(3'92) 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 15 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


^TVie,  p-cA\ o\-o  wi  A_cvcfi u)V\q.+  U Coo*> ' cl cr 4-o  b t- 1 (i  c. vvi o jT_ 


iV. 


DoriG  Cole 


2 . 


mi  u».  V?:4L_Uh  iC-t  C-Qrl*;Vni.c-Vroy>  of  rpo-A^> _Tj  rnber- 

np-fj c d4~  a.  r p rm c r Vu|  pfyi/-Uf**>4  area_. 


(^CFer  Vo  Chofk*  4 1 p^‘  -4-M  * Radios  Resource  ) 

2 In  T Q e.VuJ  ( V-i  ^ f>uf?£-  ijrtmoA  t iit^eLglujc ell  jlo  r b4'iC^_ 

4kio.V  a Precis plnjfri  Ccl  I , bioVotji  fjJ  W-  SoeiA-l r>  I I rt  baW^>  or-  Ifig 

d tf  1 

Qree^-J  nnA^lorbe  iJLi}Aq_nd;>  be  tom  \ n k-^_FF°rrr__A^_lArtpe  *- 

Unc\c  ueLop^l  (\cca ('ki  Hmq  cast-  >cu^  lor  lYlounW.  ^ H.ft.)  an  A a£cet>s 

Iri  .Ve,  _1  Lai  Q.  re  a-  i'?  f<ret  W4o.-k.P  ^„bt^ne  ?$u  fi  e_a?nc  kn  t_  c?_E_  /an  c5 

_P_°  incbaiLOCi idA<i Ak\i Ilklcona,  1_.(JIM  cl  er.fi  kin 



IjlX^  f fi£r  1-0  Cbo^Al/i  " Xrrpuc?0-~S1  PnAl  X rredr veuablr 

ComrrnA-men-y^  Df~  fv^sou “A  TVi-s  oAoxi^- iboull AaiUt 

A^>«_  ulmo'b'b  CoivSlcl  t rP-~Vcbo op  LdCiii  'W\1i>  Rna-Aleit  Area- 

Sbi6u\A  nol  b <t-  eultpe^L  1~  q uq4<-  1 A-M  action  a l lerna  4-ui^< 


LUQuli tDmm’i.t. a par-Noo  pp  idi e rpoA-leiii  rc^oukg  Arp  -4-|fn bcr 

HqoiI?  111  £ lon^  4v»rm\  i^ocxl  OP  C 0 ri  4- 1 n u i n ^ 0 n4^  

jji  p.a.n.A >r^. lim  W»r- Lik»-vtr?~\~  in  AkaT  n ren  ._fto  ad L| I HnibirJt^, 

UJ &jaA 4 knltj b oxtco v<  reA  >V»  TC-ie,  ex.4  re rra c lo Term  } eue n._ 

1 E^^£^^^.d^^ojte^ob.llb£X!ii{.iLcLnd. JfH<j__ar  re  Forfeit  


Ifofclg-ggira  [ Wie  dprrimt  t roe  n4  it  irreugr-S  ' Me,  qn,P  >rr£  A-ngacib  le. 


_(^3a HOcLu  .For  jrr>  (Ai'qcLikfi  o J^) 


^ j-CSe  ter..  1° ^airng.rk|  ~ _S  ' Rinl  oc^i  r/^\ Diucri  uTlj ^) . _5a  _fnuoL-v^ 

__  p cc  5 eni^d  cu^  SciemhWc  t>k-ocL  j Ui  "s  p oink  cjl  ou  1 A b e._ne  ?A_ 
— ic_t£iU2«^PUi<l_EDt/n(tr_menf>^  e ni  e io_t_Oi_n  aim  na_l_.l  cxnJli 


C4^iA_£.rnphaL3.r3i& Abie,  re  Vgoko^ of  \an^e  Tra  gT*b  ° r rli>ir>^i- 


Area.  The  remainder  of  the  roadless  area  would  not  be  affected  and 
naturalness  would  remain  high.  Also  within  the  analysis  area,  we  will  not 
cut  any  old  growth  retention  stands  (See  Figure  III -3.) 

1 MAIHTA1K  FISH  HABITAT 

Conclusions  reached  within  the  DEIS  regarding  expected  effects  to  water 
quality  and  aquatic  habitats  are  based  upon  available  information, 
professional  experience  and  judgement,  and  related  research.  In  the  case  of 
the  proposed  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale,  the  Hydrology  Effects  section  of  the 
FEIS  discusses  the  history,  nature,  and  effects  of  activities  within  a 
neighboring  watershed  of  similar  geologic  origin,  in  order  tc  provide  a 
foundation  upon  which  conclusions  concerning  expected  effects  to  water 
quality  and  aquatic  habitat  within  the  Woodtick  Creek  and  Moyei  Creek 
watersheds  can  be  based  As  indicated  within  the  FEIS,  post • urplementat ion 
aquatic  conditions  observed  within  the  Deep  Creek  drainage,  with  road  desiar., 
layout  and  densities  similar  to  or  exceeding  those  of  the  proposed  Moyei  Sail 
action  alternatives,  strengthen  the  conclusions  that,  with  the  exception  cf 
Alternative  3,  the  levels  of  timber  management  activity  proposed  within  t lie 
array  of  Moyer  Salt  action  alternatives  are  indeed  fully  compatible  with 
Forest  water  quality  and  aquatic  habitat  maintenance  goals  The  probable 
incompatibility  of  Alternative  3 with  water  quality  and  fisheries  resource 
goals  stems  from  an  si t e - speci f i c inability  to  effectively  implement,  within 
the  Salt  Creek  drainage,  those  same  mitigation  measures  which  have  been 
proven  successful  within  other  Forest  watersheds  in  protecting  and 
maintaining  aquatic  habitats. 

Pre - implementation  substrate  core  sampling  operations  on  Woodtick  Creek,  and 
post ■ implementation  core  sampling  operations  on  Deep  Creek,  have  indicated 
that  substrate  conditions  currently  exceed  maximum  habitat  potential  on  both 
streams.  Although  lab  analysis  of  macroinvertebrates  is  not  yet  complete, 
cursory  observations  have  shovr.  no  discernible  difference  in  diversity  or 
vigor  between  pre-pro3ect  Woodtick  Creek  populations  and  pos t - impl emen t a t i on 
Deep  Creek  populations.  Given  the  current  condition  of  substrate  quality 
within  the  Moyer  Salt  analysis  area,  and  the  observed  pos t - impl emen t at l on 
conditions  within  Che  Deep  Creek  drainage,  there  is  little  evidence  to 
suggest  that  macroinvertebrate  or  vertebrate  aquatic  resources  would  be 
adversely  impacted  as  a result  of  implementation  of  action  Alternatives 
2A,  4,  S,  or  6.  Additional  analysis  of  Alternative  3 beyond  that  included 
within  the  DEIS,  has  identified  an  high  risk,  of  surface  erosion  and  sedirent 
impacts  within  the  Salt  Creek  drainage,  and  a consequent  risk  to  existing 
macroinvertebrate  and  vertebrate  aquatic  Gpecies. 

5 . UNEVEN  - AGED  MANAGEMENT  AS  A DETAILED  ALTERNATIVE 

The  Draft  EIS,  on  page  2-2,  includes  our  rationale  for  not  proposing 
uneven-aged  management.  In  the  lodgepole  community,  the  presence  of  heavy 
fuels  make  it  a physical  impossibility.  Even  when  it  is  possible  cc  skid 
logs  and  save  a residual  stand,  it  is  often  not  possible  to  dispose  of  the 
slash  without  clearcut t ing 


Two  alternatives  were  developed  in  response  to  general  concerns  about 

ithin  the  lodgepole  community.  Alternatives  € and 
k-ith  islands  in  order  to  better  meet  visual 


standard  clearcutting 
would  utilize  clearcutting 


Caring  lor  the  Lend  and  Serving  People 


F S-62M 4 2Sbn 


MOYER  SALT 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 15 


[lnd  l^iatn  lu  V„  And,  \e5&^ab/lAii_Fro^»riC  r<  i^V^-oVv  , liHfb 

(Tia-nda  Lt-  or f\J eco  Pcr->^tc\u.)e  i \n  Fortfirfrij  j ~t^e-  |m  |)  or 4-tan  ce. 

QP~  rYVxtnVo.nA  in^_6>iC)duJdc5il-^_ftjr\dsJjlluc‘t_eC4'Suii^(rii_^  li£>ul/...b«_ 


iML  f)rirl\a>‘(|_LcnCcrKi_in_anLj.dei;i-£,^M_re^arzdi  o-  beo_?A  k_ 

in  a rr>aclle56  a rcii 

( ft^ecr~  V-6  SurOmfl.rv^  ~ "5 a^i Cbo  ^'br  ^ ^ '.nha  Cfi< p <j  H :f 

Xn  5pXr-  b<h_^Dixf.uJ<i  ll  ,4>r_i  V4-tn  ■%_dotti.mer!\<‘X_tn\dj/|a  VtdrL  plans 

C\r_A f)(bPi  R«^arcLni^  PiiV'itrL^b  in Vbe  A c[~ton  A IVeAna.Wjfi  / X . 

ti«4'  Lelp  bub  rg^-l  vg<-rj  i TLxre  can be,  ND.fl  ci-cob 


4_  Lull  u-U  u-iout  J > -a  LUajj  d^ireai-^n ^(Xe ha  biirftX p_e r id  gnj- 

Qnd  ana,jromoU4  Fi^bi  ‘bpauJmr-i/f  , iucu.bg  J'?^Cin<j__^bktU_a  fC._ 

• ^ p ? _nli l >c 1=  da  bo y_Ll)ailijfv^  :l-on_ a n XiX  l/F  trAiA ( 0 re^  fl  n,  a.  I > 

£u  £ n ie o ^ 'IP)  £-_  ha  t>j-L*'t_in_:f£>il  LAna5_|i/i  arf« 1 6._  r><5  f 

teinAj^Ui  ed_Ai_fbe.pre5Cn±_X]  me dut ito_db« fn lc<l/  polUi_L*oc i_bip 

it  C.  &laxKbirtl_/yimt C<?q  r«^  joy  5_0>— eatj  . e.r  c.  or=i_5>li  a uT‘L_b  c.  m aJ-t. 

p . i±_  i;o..  p^iiine_toridxLre’»_ F.crz  p L l^puHce^  U5£ irXJAe 

y*.pi  j be-H  _\h%  cl  Oujn_gLrearn._u.ti  tee.  pc  Uu_-|<6ei_l  i r^soluecJ  r 


X-CfteEer^-Xtx Xliopbe  ^ d .i  T&blf  -1  - b Vteec  l 3 i^_LDi  idJte<i_lkb-_ 

b lj _ A \ b_£ rnoAiufc  ~),  Tn  q en eg  no./  ; X I ferw  f iue.  / 5b &uus 


_TLnh 9nfim en~V  OjXdliP-e,  {JabiVgV- lo tnonf  Ca4<^  oati, 

..QnLqun A r£  A Tt d,0Ci_ii^jSbiuLi £ I K Ha  b Ma  1 Po  kn  Put  J :U_ 


-i_Le IcuJ e r iXian Xfe. t otter  AbernaXx/ig i , a n c8-  Q~t-  tt t ^Arne.— 

_ , tJiv'pr  TcP  forage  c\nA Pug  Ga me  S^cur-il^  ^ U<^ lig^ 

— itjT n /b Hi  3.J.3,-'*  'd  » Xt  j 3 also n o tg-A  iv-i  e_ D £.l5 

~)  td  4-  i fi  i s _Qr_e_o= a.  t&n  Aurnmer  For  etKi  dcgr; 

-i 3Y)£L5£2^0JC£; AU|  rea^on^  Fof~  preFer<-in^  A /i^  /* 


SALE 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


Doris  Cole 


quality  objectives  and  maintain  habitat  for  other  resources  dependant  upon 
structural  diversity.  Where  clearcutting  is  prescribed,  many  of  the  6tands 
would  have  approximately  IS  percent  of  the  area  within  the  unit  left  in  uncut 
islands  ranging  from  1/2  an  acre  to  one  acre  in  size.  With  heavy  fuel 
loadings,  6uch  as  those  found  in  the  analysis  area,  the  retention  of  islands 
is  the  only  practical  and  economically  feasible  alternative  to  standard 
clearcutting . 


Harvest  treatments  prescribed  for  stands  within  the  Douglas-fir  community 
were  expanded  to  include  the  modified  irregular  6helterwood  system  Thi6 
system  perpetuates  or  creates  from  two  to  four  age  groups  and  canopy  levels 
The  concept  of  the  irregular  shelterwood  system  is  to  mimic  natures  natural 
reproduction  system.  The  end  result  i6  a diversified  stand  structure  which 
maintains  a forested  appearance  and  provides  vertical  diversity  through 
multiple  canopy  layers. 

Alternative  6 has  been  listed  as  the  "PREFERRED*  Alternative  in  the  Final 
EIS  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected"  Alternative  but  will  do  so  in  the 
Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review  Please  have 
your  comments  back  to  us  in  30  days. 

Sincerely, 


JOHN  E . BURNS 
Forest  Supennsor 

Enclosure 


Caring  lor  the  Land  and  Serving  People 

FS-6200-28b(3  92) 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 15 


-I~  r\  -jh  e.  dlnxd  y oul  cLo  decide. -f-o  <=n4er 

UmS  roo A\c‘?£)  Q.rga,;  Qnbj  A U>rna.4-iue.  -iliocL  tuoutdL  fj 


I frte-  lea^l  f-o  iii  £ ecci‘5^6i^ir\  n nd.  hi  o cir  u en  rlj^  to  a iU<e 

A-  Ht/inaUu,*.  ^ ^ civ\& or>Lt^  l-ti-en  ip  guev-i  - a e<=t  ore^cn  i p jcj,^s 

uierg-  cjrealltj  reilucrtfl  , p at  L<-  6-^  ta »~U^  c [ea  r r Cii  tiro (Lnd 

J] rPU p ei e c Wo « u> a ^ 4 p_c_  p r<^x > p itiLn ok o i c£__ ,_D pen i n <j 

a rt>p-A^£5  6 argcL  -l-o  r H~in^ cti-wj,  uiooJ  muno  j)  f >r|f  n~t- 

Qo^-  iunu(d  be  q.  4raue-bb(j  c\yyA  ire  < med \a  i>  In  « X reo_fi2g_ 

fLgl  Some  rbar  cu~  H~i  ■<  ^ l*>  n et  g-O^a  rM-|  in  ,g;nl| 


tfmi 


in  £ ni 

q r.  d^QrE;jYn-!>l{fc-Lo<',_  and  iht>go-l *nicu^ icn  , L llL_d n u^_as_^, k 1>  T 

r^bor  >a)  i IL da  cum  ^'rtld  t|  rounds.  - prop  3 p eci  <l]  i 

E/J-C  Lx_  cl  gL  t -Q  txi  . ./ 

Ed r. £ -s-L  Sen)  e<r\ p lo ^ f g$  h 4JJ f.  Ih  e co>  \ ] edtm  iu I eti1  <j  t. 

nJ  iHi  lU  \o  0-14  >14  <j  <»  Foe  a I le<)  n a.  Lao  <*  4 4o  c I fartu  tit  u ^ • I lieij  K n cuJ 

vie.'  pil.gQ  Ili anti  ik&Cj  ftrnm  f b e eC-c.\oc\  uoj  Ujo^  j>  ]o  Sim^lijt 

3 4-e  r g . 

Idaho  1 * Tru.U|  q.  gm/g u£_  |r;murt  or-  Qur  Umlcd 1?5 

A.  1 Uixi)  4hf  Vu^li-e^i  percend-a^j  £ op-  i'Ls  lonil  < >->  Forf^l  of-  1 Lv 

UJ  £P  It  g,lQ_l  LqJt!  j j mp  re-  Lm\clernf65  Tcj  fll'niakf  On4  jf  

A^t>>0  a^n  oALiet- OP  4 L>  £ r n rsi  i <j  U.AUt>  'SlaLp.e..  T-L  \6  ren6(jJr»edt  F-Or 

ti_u*lia  m £ J_lto  n u.n  tCi_^_£.an  1^  J>  e_J^Oi^Xgxn_ 

Jlgialjul-pPr  Vc-Q  no Q-ntL  \p-  m i»nli^  blti-l  etS LUax| 

l£.g.g.grt>  * one-  of  ihe,  F e<-Q  b|'^  t e Cq[o^\ca  \ U|  Cn<^  p ) g ~le_  un-lrumm  elM 

ire  ax iia_  _ jh  a„  uqlu<?  r-  A % . 

Ple.eXe._Jl  Ph6idgr  Ihiu 

idrr'iVs,  nih)pn  \Jm 


tulilrd^  ofr  tuf  n^d-rjin^  1 

ollc de C- 1 tjcfl  a a *,  -In 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 15 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


Preferred  A \\  e r <-n  o-.'Vi.O  , 


T. _ _cLo & p q \ o 1 a Fa c_  J.k «- vf>_Velleri_ 


C CPrv\yyygn~V^>  t bo.1  I F^6r\_0  £Ri-|  _ 'il  non^  lu_  a kfluL  bk|  t 

«*■  ^ I V . % Y 

Yvall er , UVutn  1C— y o u — £ o — mam — 5o — 1 imlf  n mij — 'to 

iyvl^-  u ifiuJ  s 4. p£ — Mil*,  reaxLiiei. you.  i« Aim  TV)  a lI_ 

i~  B>QW1_Su  n.u  1 1 (,£. Crun_.be. ^ j oiu _/. Ae-t_me_knincL 

pij r_  ft> no. I_ cAe ci ^ i o n ___ 


V 


* 


<5-YU- 


£±Qujl 


DoM»  E Col# 
Jt3o*Droo*i 
5S5  Nonh  Roop.  1*4 
Suun.illa,  C»  Ml 30 


' p e_ (U4__re.ceuJ.e4 no+c. regard  i 

_Lho.  e d p^IL tu  k lcR_S c m <2_Ra  uJ A i ^2 n o Ji_ 

r>eo-cK  y (LU^_  1 n HayxU  'q  2,_i 

- Ole)  AAcUg-frS*. 2to_KL_6J  man 


,rd! 


*N  n u > I It*,  f C A .^lg/3  £l 


\lea)  /\ 

dicing  - 

55  5 WorlR  Room 

*.' 

r 

Su^amjtil  9-&_JJ}£> 

45- 


lu 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 16 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


United  States 
Department  of 
Agriculture 


Forest 

Service 


Salmon 

National 

Forest 


P.0.  Box  729 
Salmon,  ID  83467 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date  : 


Tom  Rieger 
Forester 

Salmon  Intermountain,  Inc. 
P.0  Box  928 
Salmon,  ID  83467 


Salmon  national  Forest 
Attn:  Lynn  Bennett 

DEIS  Response  - Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale, 
P.  0.  Box  729 
Salmon,  ID  83467 


Dear  Mr.  Bennett: 


1 


I support  Alternative  #2,  the  propose 
Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  Environmental 
I i eel  that  this  is  the  best  alternative, 
raw  material  for  the  local  forest  products 
protects  wildlife  Bnd  fisheries  through  sp 
management  practices  for  logging  and  road 


d action,  in  the 
Impact  Statement, 
because  it  provides 
industry  and 
ecific  best 
building. 


This  proposed  action  will  provide  an  estimated  4.9  MM 
board  feet  of  timber  to  the  local  forest  products  industry. 

This  local  industry  is  solely  dependent  on  the  National  Forest 
and  the  BLM  for  its  raw  material  supply. 

Salmon  I n t ermoun t a i n is  one  of  the  largest  private  employers  in 
Lemhi  County,  and  needs  these  raw  materials  to  continue 
operating. 


Moyer  and  Woodtick  Creeks  are  important  streams  for 
anadromous  fish  species.  There  has  been  no  use  of  the  Wood- 
tick,  or  Moyer  creeks  by  anadromous  fish  since  the  1960  s,  due 
to  chemical  pollution  from  an  abandoned  mine  up  stream  from  the 
study  area.  This  will  continue  to  be  the  case  until  the  water 
contamination  from  the  Black  Bird  Mine  is  corrected. 


By  using  proven  beat  management  practices  (BMP),  there 
be  no  degradation  to  the  current  and  future  fisheries  Bnd 
habitat  in  the  study  area. 

BMP  for  road  construction:  - windrow  slash  at  the  toe 

the  slope  to  provide  for  b sediment  trap. 

- grass  seed  rut  and  fill  slopes  to  help  stabilize 


will 

their 

of 


Dear  Mr.  Rieger: 

Thank  you  for  your  comments  of  August  8,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale 
Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis  process  and 
have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource  specialists.  Their 
ideas  are  the  basi6  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and  comprise  the  rest 
of  this  letter. 

1 . COMMUNITY  STABILITY 

Thank  you  for  your  support  of  our  proposed  alternative.  We  agree  that  timber 
harvest  play6  a key  role  in  the  economic  future  of  Salmon.  The  demand  for 
timber  from  the  Salmon  National  Fore6t  and  part6  of  the  Cobalt  Ranger 
District  has  been  strong  and  i6  expected  to  increase.  One  objective  of  the 
Forest  Plan  is  to  provide  timber  outputs  at  a level  that  will  allow  the 
continuation  of  industries  dependent  on  those  outputs. 

2 . CLOSURE  OF  THE  MOYER  PEAK  JEEP  TRAIL 

The  Moyer  Peak  Jeep  Trail  (#6202)  would  remain  open  for  historical  access, 
except  for  the  6pur  road  just  west  of  Moyer  Peak  in  the  SE1/4NW1/4  of 
Section  16.  This  spur  road  will  be  closed  by  creating  an  earthen  barrier 
that  prevents  vehicle  accesB. 

3 . TIMBER  SALES  AND  ROADLESS /WILDERNESS  ISSUES 

The  "Roadless  Area/Wi ldemes6  Issue"  is  not  considered  appropriate  rationale 
for  "stopping  this  timber  harvest."  The  roadless  resource  i6  included  in  the 
Draft  Environmental  Impact  Statement  as  an  affected  resource  and  the  effects 
of  the  various  alternatives  are  displayed  so  that  the  public  will  understand 
some  of  the  trade-offs  that  occur  when  development  occurs  in  a previously 
undeveloped  area. 


Caring  lor  Ihe  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200  2fib(3'92> 


MOYER 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 16 


Page  2 August  8,  1992 


- place  water  bars  on  road  at  completion  of  harvest 
activities. 

BMP  for  logging:  - locating  and  flagging  Bkid  trails 
prior  to  harvesting  activities. 

- directional  falling  in  shelterwood  and  seedtree 
harvest  units. 

- water  bar  and  grasB  seed  skid  trails  over  20 V.  slope 
at  the  end  of  harvesting  activities  in  the  unit. 

- leave  10  - 20  tons/acre  of  logging  Blash  per  unit, 
this  will  not  only  provide  for  long  term  nutrient 
recycling,  but  provide  woody  debriB  for  eedlment 
traps  throughout  the  harvest  unit  (short  term 
benef it). 

- maintain  adequate  filter  strips  adjacent  to  the 
streams. 

This  timber  sale  will  also  provide  money  to  the  Forest  Service 
to  realign  the  culvert  at  Woodtick  Creek  and  F.  S.  road  t 107. 
This  culvert  is  an  obstruction  to  fiBh  migration  on  Woodtick 
Creek.  If  anadromouB  fish  ever  do  return  to  this  drainage,  it 
will  allow  them  to  reach  their  spawning  grounds  upstream. 

This  area  is  UBed  by  a wide  variety  of  wildlife.  To  help 
protect  the  wildlife  of  the  area,  all  harvesting  activities 
should  take  place  behind  closed  gates.  This  will  allow 
logging,  hauling,  and  road  building  in  two  subdivisions  at  a 
time.  It  will  also  let  the  wildlife  use  the  remaining 
subdivisions  without  being  bothered  by  the  timber  sale 
activities.  Harvesting  some  of  the  timber  in  this  area  will 
open  up  new  forage  areas  for  wildlife,  thus  improving  overall 
habitat.  I feel  the  Moyer  Jeep  Trail  should  be  closed,  to 
2 prevent  motorized  vehicles  from  using  roBds  thBt  are  behind  a 
1 ocked  gate. 


TIMBER  SALE 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


Tom  Rieger 


--  — Muernauve  m the  Final 

t h f re  n0t  yet  Ch°Ben  thG  'Selected’  Alternative  bat  -ill  do  »o  in  the 
Record  of  Decision.  Encloeed  is  the  Final  FIS  for  your  review  Please  have 
your  comment b back  to  us  in  30  days. 


Sincerely, 


JOHN  E . BURNS 
Fore6t  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


Caring  for  the  Land  end  Serving  People 

FS-6200-28H3  <?2> 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 16 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


Page  3 August  8,  1992 


The  timber  in  this  Etudy  Brea  1b  infested  with  insect  and 
diBeaae  problems  (spruce  budworm,  mountain  pine  beetle  , and 
dwarf  mistle-toe).  Harvesting  the  timber  in  this  area  will 
greatly  reduce  the  potential  for  a catastrophic  Insect  and 
disease  infestation  and  resulting  timber  loss.  The  timber 
harvest  will  bIso  reduce  the  potential  lor  a major  fire  in  the 
area,  by  breaking  up  the  continues  fuel  base,  providing  fire 
lines  (roads)  end  giving  the  Forest  Service  good  roaded  access 
to  the  area. 

The  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  will  lay  within  the  Taylor 
Mountain  Roadless  Area,  #13-902.  The  Roadless  A r ea / W i 1 der neBS 
3 lSBue  should  not  be  grounds  for  stopping  this  timber  harvest. 

This  roadless  area  was  not  recommended  for  wilderness  in  RARE  I 
or  RARE  II,  nor  is  it  currently  listed  for  wilderness 
consideration  in  theSalmon  Forest  Plan,  page  C-24.  Only  167.  of 
the  Roadless  Area  will  be  affected,  leaving  approximately 
53,000  acres  in  a roadless  condition.  There  have  bIbo  been 
numerous  small  intrusions  into  this  roadless  area.  These 
intrusions  alone  should  eliminate  this  area  for  any 
consideration  as  a wilderness  area. 

I believe  that  the  Forest  Service  has  done  a good  and 
thorough  Job  of  evaluating  this  proposed  timber  sale  and  its 
resulting  effects  on  the  environment,  which  will  be  minor,  and 
should  proceed  with  this  timber  sale. 


Sincerel y 


Dallas  Olson 
President 

SALMON  IHTERMOUHTAIH,  INC. 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 17 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


August  10,  1992 


/-UV>  I - - ■ 


Adion  Q 


United  StateB 
Department  of 
Agriculture 


ForeGt  Salmon 

Service  National 

Forest 


P 0.  Box  729 
Salmon.  ID  83467 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date  : 


Bert  Jefferies 
RT  1 Box  7B 
Salmon.  ID  83467 


Hr.  John  Burns,  Supervisor 
Salmon  National  Forest 
P.O.  Box  729 
Salmon,  Idaho  83467 

Dear  John 

I would  like  to  register  my  support  for  the  Salmon  National 
Forest's  planned  Moyer  Salt  Timber  sale  located  on  the  Cobalt 
Ranger  District.  It  has  come  to  my  attention  that  opposition  to 
the  sale  is  based  largely  on  concern  for  damage  to  summer  elk 
habitat.  Having  worked  in  the  Salmon  National  Forest  for  over  four 
years,  it  has  been  my  observation  that  well-managed  timber  harvests 
have  only  temporary  impact  on  elk  populations.  In  spite  of  all  the 
activity  on  the  Beartrack  project,  there  are  more  elk  in  the 
Leesburg  area  now  than  four  years  ago  when  I first  became  involved 
with  the  project.  It  is  not  uncommon  to  see  elk  standing  around 
drill  rigs  early  in  the  morning  when  the  drill  crews  arrive.  The 
accusations  that  this  sale  will  disturb  the  Key  Elk  Summer  Range 
are  unfounded. 

It  is  not  true  that  logging  activity  in  this  sale  area  will 
have  a permanent  impact  on  elk  populations;  in  fact,  a well-managed 
timber  harvest  will  likely  improve  the  habitat  over  the  long  term. 


Sincerely  yours. 


'HU  79, 

-TLcj.  3 3 AC.7 


Dear  Hr.  JefferieB: 

Thank  you  for  your  commence  of  August  9,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale 
Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis  process  and 
have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource  specialists. 


Thanks  for  your  vote  of  confidence  in  our  management  of  the  Forest.  All 
proposed  action  alternatives  contain  many  mitigation  measures  and  management 
requirements  designed  to  specifically  help  ensure  that  elk  habitat  is 
adequate  to  support  the  elk  population  goal  of  the  current  Idaho  Department 
of  Fish  and  Game's  5-Year  Elk  Species  Management  Plan.  We  will  continue  to 
do  our  best  in  managing  all  the  resources  of  the  Forest  including  the  elk 


Alternative  6 has  been  listed  as  the  -PREFERRED*  Alternative  in  the  Final 
EIS  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  -Selected-  Alternative  but  will  do  so  in  the 
Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review.  Please  have 
your  comments  back  to  us  in  30  day6 . 


Sincerely, 


JOHN  E . BURNS 
ForeGt  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


Caring  for  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200-2Rb(3'92l 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 18 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


United  State6  Forest 

Department  of  Service 

Agriculture 


Salmon  P.0.  Box  729 

National  Salmon,  ID  03467 

Forest 


Moyer  Salt  Draft  EIS  Comment 


On  August  10,  1992,  Deborah  Bohren  (Box  607,  Ketchum,  ID)  phoned  John  Burns 
and  expressed  her  concerns.  She  favored  Alternative  3 In  order  to  protect  elk 
habitat  and  also  expressed  the  need  to  work  together  and  consider  all  concerns 
and  maintain  environmental  quality. 


Deborah  Bohren 
P.O.  Box  607 
Ketchum,  ID  83340 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date  : 


Dear  Mg.  Bohren: 

Thank  you  for  your  commentG  on  August  10,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Draft 
Environmental  Statement.  Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the 
environmental  analysis  process  and  have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our 
team  of  resource  specialists. 

Preserving  or  maintaining  key  elk  habitat  is  also  important  to  the  Salmon 
National  Forest  be  evidenced  by  our  Forest  Plan  guidelines.  All  proposed 
action  alternatives  contain  many  mitigation  measures  and  management 
requirements  designed  to  specifically  help  ensure  that  post-sale  elk  habitat 
is  adequate  to  support  the  elk  population  goal  of  the  current  Idaho 
Department  of  Fish  and  Game’s  5-Year  Species  Management  Plan. 

We  are  also  concerned  about  all  the  other  resources  we  manage  and  have 
addressed  those  as  well  as  elk  habitat  in  our  final  document. 

Alternative  6 has  been  listed  as  the  "PREFERRED*  Alternative  in  the  Final 
EXS.  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected"  Alternative  but  will  do  so  in  the 
Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review.  Please  have 
your  comments  back  to  us  in  30  days. 

Sincerely, 


JOHN  E . BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


Caring  lor  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200-28b(3 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 19 


_ viu£ h&tLy. 'I'l&xJi  thru Bt_  . ■ i 

(£W,  7d°!r .-■■■ 

I dadLd  ------ 

iTXiirSin;  .... .... 

llj&u  Lu-.B  wriest  TUiU 


(Zu£j  % /ff<L. 


V 


i^KuZ-US, . 


o-ccb  wv'U'j l r Lu-i^- 

U J^^~]t*llht-0l  J.'l&lliSf'fuL  Ll^f^uyt  ^{\Q:.  ..  

i-liud  .ii  yyUS7U.Lt:  £Jb_  ^ccni-ni/ri'7v^tcZI)_.  £ ... 

^rtlE'ladxtj^  <2.$rt'idin)  at  u>  A^coU&t  dtu  nUXuj  LrUj 
-ft  ^LiU'^s  §aM  'Tcsnfar  £cdu  F'O^h'  “' 

Vo  c/oWll  MU/lfPM-itu. dJ^LLvuL  ^.t^(J  l^lsJbdisu  _ 

oti&ilAc/  „ bjuL^^UXJ^CtLu^Ca  Juusi: . A dfuuu&Ad: 

l£dou  loUdUL^.  E*>lL  Jj4_.  (dtuucr .oc>  _ ou^a±L.  y&*cr___ 

Ztifryu  (i.r,y  .teC . Jz-tJ-j  _-i( 7 7o cUzudjluh- — 

_ kyhj.  ^ c&*±XA<ia*1  ? 

tidbit  2>/A-Vtb:  L-}  S/Xt,  nt(.oi<lKJ_  A^ui 

JW hiu.iL  PPtL  de/k  (J  Lib  2)?  J.  au^e*  VA^./- . 

_ ^ ^ iitdeud  Uu  . 'Stodu^u  AS7.  rL>  El  me st.  - 

; d^£UU*uPPU  V^..  /t Oja) _r&*~d4-  -Lil  OAUU^-C  y^uE,<j7txJ7: 

o-ddd.  lt  tocX  __  QJl&J-C. . <fAi^  d (//X . <L  1/4  =_  r yC  . 

_ . . *C9uJbJ . C^e-  Oe^Uh'Jf^  / Juft  f StMrtXfdd 

CMtlu.qU^d^y  i d^LCPdr^ 

id.cuLL.  .cdcduTd.  dtp  -tch. 

I N ^[uJu.lt±JL-r LUdU'liJ’d toJU  £ _ P^Aj^LAAlh’.  _ VO-  

'ddpUf— (2.  dujsdxdiJ-u.^  © CL^^t.p.fLQ  >yiu\xJ-'-.  im-Jiuaju  dddu^j 

PXL^J^$_A>7-<UUL>  d Ot>7<Vt._ 

.ijd-6>tstidiu  .dd^^cdt,  f , 7/<-P.  -7uJ\  jJjuJadu^  ipUd lcji_ 

• L JijJfivLjjr  A.dif  6<1.  bd/  yO- >udxcjed . b.u  . f eniw Uy/j 

■ /V/-  /9-y  v/^ . hoOQ^tdLud^  K^f  &X  . SUmnt£K..  KKl>6B._ 
'-pdrvt^  V -/*  ku<~  b&  5B'.  fdx(  SCUjd  is  Oil.  LO-CUiUcJ 
d&'&'ld.  Cut.  d b\jLAJU  (1JUl(1£/i/)ocls__  BlL.  CK  . k?tj _ c^^-dx. — 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


United  States  ForeBt 

Department  of  Service 

Agriculture 


Salmon  P.O.  Box  729 

National  Salmon,  ID  83467 

Forest 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date  : 


Cheryl  Hart 
P.O.  Box  267 
Carmen,  ID  83462 


Dear  M6 . Hart : 

Thank  you  for  your  comments  of  August  9,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale. 
Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis  process  and 
have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource  specialists.  Their 
ideas  are  the  basis  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and  comprise  the  rest 
of  this  letter. 

1 . MAINTAIN  WILDLIFE  HABITAT 

Analyses  quantifying  post-sale  elk  habitat  conditions  were  completed  for  all 
alternatives  and  are  summarized  in  Table  IV-8  on  page  IV-38  of  the  EIS. 

These  data  indicate  a slight  increase  in  elk  habitat  potential  in  Area  II  and 
a slight  decrease  in  Area  I with  a net  result  very  near  current.  There  will, 
however,  be  a decrease  in  elk  habitat  security  and  an  increase  in 
vulnerability  of  hunted  elk.  However,  thi6  area  will  not  by  any  means  be 
devastated  and  will  remain  in  very  acceptable  elk  habitat  condition 
post  - sale . 

2 . INCONSISTENCY  WITH  FOREST  SERVICE  POLICY  REGARDING  CUTTING  TIMBER 
IN  KESR 

"Key  Elk"  (4A  or  4B)  management  prescriptions  in  the  Forest  Plan  emphasize 
management  of  big  game  habitat  in  winter  and  summer  ranges.  Our  particular 
timber  sale  contains  cutting  units  within  areas  that  received  3A  anadromou6 
fish  habitat  prescriptions  and  5A,  5B  and  5C  timber  management  prescription 
in  the  Forest  Plan,  not  the  "Key  Elk"  prescriptions. 

Any  selected  action  alternative,  however,  would  meet  Forest  Plan  Wildlife 
Standards  and  Guidelines  for  wildlife  prescriptions. 

3 . CLOSURE  OF  THE  MOYER  PEAK  JEEP  TRAIL 

The  Moyer  Peak  Jeep  Trail  (#6202)  would  remain  open  for  historical  access, 
except  for  the  spur  road  just  west  of  Moyer  Peak  in  the  SE1/4NW1/4  of 


Caring  (or  (he  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-eioo-zebo^ii 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 19 


(UUcSsL 
^ h f.  AU^J-crj- 


CA^ic(L^ 


'-*l -t-^T  '3nb<>-t_  LoidjL, 

VAl£ 

'Ok^Ld  Co)  .CL  CMJ^ 

■CC^jl.o_,  -Vo  Co-<L,Ld- til q_,  f ! 

Xtccj.A—’  -CCC^A-C'V'iCLd.  t-JtctZ*  - 

^CsiajCA. -tvJL,  Au  OAJO^}  bj-  pCLeSoSJ^JiU 

OLA^  J2^\CCJ-  L^t_  <JUU  &&<hsb-b-lb  , . . . , ... 

CCXi^A.-^^Lc^’  dtAj  rJ-A  QCIA^J  CG^Zte^ued 


■ a-j  C'L  f^UUbCZ^ 


t<5  ._  . 


...  XAuy  JLAt5jl. . CcttiU^JL ^CQ.^j^'y  A/byJ 

/pjirLr^^vjb^L  BH^un  ' x~\J 

(b Jti-ovCcQ 


C^t'.  U 


A QA? 

(J<uAxyvtt~fv<) 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


Cheryl  Hart  2 

Section  16.  This  spur  road  will  be  closed  by  creating  an  earthen  barrier 
that  prevents  vehicle  access. 

4 . RESTRICTION  OF  LIVESTOCK  WITH  FENCES  AND  CATTLEGUARDS 

We  are  committed  to  install  cattleguard6  on  new  roads  whenever  they  cro6s  an 
existing  fence.  There  are  presently  no  fences  in  the  Moyer  Salt  analysis 
area,  so  we  have  not  planned  any  cattleguards  on  the  roads . 

When  the  Forest  Plan  was  developed,  grazing  allotments,  wildlife  boundaries, 
and  forage  production  capabilities  were  used  to  establish  livestock  grazing 
limits  at  levels  to  prevent  livestock/wildlife  conflicts  By  increasing  the 
available  area  within  a given  allotment  with  the  same  number  of  cattle,  the 
result  is  a dispersal  of  livestock.  This  reduces  concentrated  use  in  a 
specific  area  and  thus  improves  the  general  range  condition,  resulting  in 
better  habitat  for  both  the  livestock  and  wildlife.  The  key  elk  summer  range 
areas  are  not  given  special  consideration.  Animal  unit6  per  month  (AUM's) 
per  allotment  will  not  increase  as  a result  of  thi6  timber  6ale 

5 . RESTRICTION  OF  LIVESTOCK  WITH  FENCES  AND  CATTLE GUARDS 

We  are  committed  to  install  cattleguards  on  new  roads  whenever  they  cross  an 
existing  fence  There  are  presently  no  fences  in  the  Moyer  Salt  analysis 
area,  so  we  have  not  planned  any  cattleguards  on  the  roads. 

When  the  Forest  Plan  was  developed,  grazing  allotments,  wildlife  boundaries, 
and  forage  production  capabilities  were  used  to  establish  livestock  grazing 
limits  at  levels  to  prevent  1 ivestock /wi ldl i f e conflicts  By  increasing  the 
available  area  within  a given  allotment  with  the  6ame  number  of  cattle,  the 
result  is  a dispersal  of  livestock.  Thi6  reduces  concentrated  use  in  a 
specific  area  and  thus  improves  the  general  range  condition,  resulting  in 
better  habitat  for  both  the  livestock  and  wildlife.  The  key  elk  summer  range 
areas  are  not  given  special  consideration.  Animal  units  per  month  (AUM's) 
per  allotment  will  not  increase  ae  a result  of  this  timber  sale. 


6 . 


DISTURBANCES  FPOM  TIMBER  HARVEST  ACTIVITIES 


It  is  true  that  timber  harvesting  activities  cause  ground  and  vegetative 
disturbances.  In  the  environmental  impact  statement  we  discuss  the  specific 
impacts  each  alternative  has  on  all  resources.  You  will  be  receiving  a copy 
of  the  Final  EIS  so  you  can  review  our  analysis  of  all  the  resources 

Alternative  6 has  been  listed  as  the  ’’PREFERRED*  Alternative  in  tbe  Final 
EIS  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected”  Alternative  but  will  do  gc  in  the 
Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review.  Please  have 
your  comments  back  to  us  in  30  days. 

Sincerely, 


JOHN  E . BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 


Caring  (or  Ihe  Land  and  Serving  People 


rS-6200  28h(3  9 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 20 


T)eatte  po/tKdoK,  f r. 
12511  Sfate  75 

PO  got  310 
'KctcAukH.  075  $3340 
VL-  726-$  124  ?ax:  726-7054 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


United  States 
Department  of 
Agriculture 


Forest 
Se  rvice 


Salmon  P.O.  Box  729 

National  Salmon,  ID  83467 

Forest 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date  : 


August  9,  1992 

John  Bums,  Supervisor 
Salmon  National  Forest 
P.O.  Box  729 
Salmon,  Idaho  83467 

Mr.  Bums: 

I am  writing  today  to  express  my  support  for  Alternative  4 in  the  DEIS  which  was 
recently  completed  by  the  Salmon  National  Forest.  The  6.9  MMBF  cut  on  847  acres  in  the 
Panther  Creek  drainage  of  the  Cobalt  Ranger  District  will  be  of  great  economic  importance 
to  the  people  of  the  State  of  Idaho.  As  for  the  27.1  miles  of  road  construction  and 
reconstruction,  I am  sure  that  the  impact  on  habitat  will  be  minuscule. 

The  DEIS  states  that  the  Moyer  Peak  Jeep  Trail  (#6202)  will  be  closed  near  Moyer 
Peak.  Please,  I believe  that  this  is  a cnicial  error  and  that  the  trail  should  remain  open 
through  its’  entire  length,  enough  trails  have  been  closed  already,  do  not  close  another. 

As  the  drought  has  affected  so  many  of  us  over  the  past  seven  years  I believe  that 
it  would  be  of  great  help  to  allow  livestock  grazing  into  this  area  immediately.  An  open 
range  area  would  be  the  best  use  and  would  cause  the  least  amount  of  stress  on  wildlife  as 
the  cattle  or  sheep  would  not  concentrate  too  heavily  into  one  area. 


T ou, 


Uhjl  rrmu- 

Deane  F.  Johnson,  Jr. 


SALMON  n r. 


® 1 1 '22 

Into  0 Action  Q 

SUP — 

1 UP  1 2 3 4 5 6 

TAF  1 2 3 4 5 6 

ELM  1 2 3 4 5 6 

RRWW  123456 
AO  123456 

CC't  TO: . — . 


Deane  Johnson 
P.O.  Box 

Ketchum,  ID  83340 


Dear  Ms.  Johnson: 

Thank  you  for  your  comments  of  August  9,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale 
Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis  process  and 
have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource  specialists.  Their 
ideas  are  the  basis  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and  comprise  the  rest 
of  thi6  letter. 

1 . CLOSURE  OF  THE  MOYER  PEAK  JEEP  TRAIL 

The  Moyer  Peak  Jeep  Trail  (#6202)  would  remain  open  for  historical  access, 
except  for  the  spur  road  just  west  of  Moyer  Peak  in  the  SE1/4NW1/4  of 
Section  16.  This  spur  road  will  be  closed  by  creating  an  earthen  barrier 
that  prevents  vehicle  access. 

2 . PROVIDE  OPEN  RANGE  FOR  LIVESTOCK 

We  agree  with  you,  that  an  open  range  would  be  the  best  use  and  cause  the 
least  amount  of  stress.  When  the  Forest  Plan  was  developed,  grazing 
allotments,  wildlife  boundaries,  and  forage  production  capabilities  were  used 
to  establish  livestock  grazing  limits  at  levels  to  prevent  livestock/wildlife 
conflicts.  By  increasing  the  available  area  within  a given  allotment  with 
the  same  number  of  cattle,  the  result  i6  a dispersal  of  livestock.  Thi6 
reduces  concentrated  U6e  in  a specific  area  and  thus  improves  the  general 
range  condition,  resulting  in  better  habitat  for  both  the  livestock  and 
wi ldlif e . 

Alternative  6 has  been  listed  as  the  "PREFERRED*  Alternative  in  the  Final 
EIS.  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected"  Alternative  but  will  do  so  in  the 
Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review.  Please  have 
your  comments  back  to  us  in  30  days. 

Sincerely, 


JOHN  E . BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


Caring  for  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200-28b(3'92l 


MOYER  SALT 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 21 


cJj/f)  /far/)  J 

3a.  / /n/’  yla  / Z 3/rssf 
/V-  F,y  72? 

sins)  ^ '?~c/s3o  cf  i1// 7 


/)<fa'r  tJup/rl/foKj 

/X  O'  /u  //  /./v  f Ca  st/os  a / „ 72  2/ if 

/a  /-  /r/rx-fsO  7^’  '/’3/r  ■S'- '**■/-£  /2>  f's/a.  /&■'’'/■  7 f~ 

ytiK  Ora- s,ay/  2/  0^0/  &jg2rD:s4rH. 

, / ///  /4?a/  /rj/^  dfptjff  x'-'O. 

^ q /Or  mt  C r /<.<//<  rs  J*  S'u./n/r\a/~j  e//f  /'tlfl/j-L  , 

1 4/ /<r/)Q  I07  3 J**'*/  fa  rs/yan/  /,  /J*  O/^cer/^ 

^asi  2/1  71/ '■  /^t 


j/'-~/4;s  f>  r/^P/S/  3 a<7  f'» 

j ; y -//s  0/) a.  /■  /fr  r)  a/,  'cS-C  (/sSf^^sc/  ~/ 2 

3 7)  S , <?a  a f/J  sS-Ss.  c/5  a/~  -e  f/3  o' ,'  / sAju/j 


<4  >r>OS  / y3c Pa 5a  ■£/<-  ect  sum  I c ^/y-  >'  , 

3T  io/ei/y  a//s  3://5  fa  s u^sff  f/f/f 


2 ,? y ////<•  a or 

f //  (Ps ./  c- cc  7 


cl 5 / /-ssrs  S /c  fas  5 //-uc^-s/  4./ 


/>#,  a -*s  J n.  <*•  snu/1^ 
0H?3ac/sX  /arcc/s  fo  /3-taja  <2 a //! S 
2 2)C2  sa.  c/>  /'  O a.  (J/  //,i  /cfjy.  <l//<3  /usijj--/.  , 

' cs  /\  3 /p  ? rat  c.  rsswi/f-  Of/  /4  s isuea  forts  / 


> / 

3 4tj  £l£f  J a * ro/r-  £ a 

I 0 |«»itiiii 

1 1/1  « n (rt:in 

1 * * «r  * * 

1 n n n n «n 

^ .,Nnnnn 


Of 

■zn 


as  //-l  f./K  <i/s-  /j/252 , 

O^ssW  s 7sl 

%yo 

'j/rz  3.  oz  yy, 

—/-  c/sc/s)  ////fj  7-d / 


SALE 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


United  States 
Department  of 
Agr lcul tore 


Forest 

Service 


Salmon  P.0.  Box  729 

National  Salmon,  ID  83467 

Forest 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date  : 


Jan  Benefiel 

350  E 25th  Street 

Idaho  Falls,  ID  83404 


Dear  M6 . Benefiel: 

Thank  you  for  your  comments  of  August  8,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale 
Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis  process  and 
have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource  specialists  Their 
ideaG  are  the  basis  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and  comprise  the  rest 
of  this  letter. 

1 . PNV  COSTS 

Since  the  Draft  Environmental  Impact  Statement  (EIS) , we  have  analyzed  three 
additional  alternatives.  Alternative  6 now  is  the  most  economically 
efficient  as  determined  by  the  calculation  of  present  net  value  (PNV)  (See 
Final  EIS.)  Due  to  the  variables  involved  in  performing  economic  analysis 
that  cover  long  periods  of  time  (in  this  case  up  to  120  years),  the 
differences  in  PNV  between  the  alternatives  are  relatively  insignificant.  It 
i6  interesting  to  note  that  alternatives  with  the  same  mix  of  silvicultural 
prescriptions  will  show  an  increasingly  negative  PNV  with  an  increase  in 
acres  when  stumpage  rates  are  somewhere  below  $100/mbf  (such  as  those  used  to 
calculate  the  long-term  average) . On  the  other  hand  a very  slight  increase 
in  stumpage  rates,  for  example  close  to  or  a little  over  $100/mbf  will  6how 
the  opposite.  That  is,  with  an  increase  in  acres  the  PNV  will  be 
increasingly  positive.  Therefore  given  the  likelihood  of  a reduced  national 
timber  supply  and  increased  stumpage  values  it  is  likely  that  alternatives 
which  harvest  the  most  acres  will  eventually  have  the  highest  PNV  We  will, 
however,  consider  PNV  along  with  all  the  factors  and  resources  before 
choosing  the  final  course  of  action. 

2 . RESTRICTION  OF  LIVESTOCK  WITH  FENCES  AND  CATTLE GUARDS 

We  are  committed  to  install  cattleguards  on  new  road6  whenever  they  cross  an 
existing  fence.  There  are  presently  no  fences  in  the  Moyer  Salt  analysis 
area,  so  we  have  not  planned  any  cattleguards  on  the  roads. 


Caring  lor  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200  28b(3/92) 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 21 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


Jan  Benef iel  2 

When  the  Forest  Plan  was  developed,  grating  allotments,  wildlife  boundaries, 
and  forage  production  capabilities  were  used  to  establish  livestock  grazing 
limits  at  levels  to  prevent  1 i vestock/wi ldl i f e conflicts.  By  increasing  the 
available  area  within  a given  allotment  with  the  same  number  of  cattle,  the 
result  is  a dispersal  of  livestock..  This  reduces  concentrated  U6e  in  a 
specific  area  and  thu6  improves  the  general  range  condition,  resulting  in 
better  habitat  for  both  the  livestock  and  wildlife.  The  key  elk  summer  range 
areas  are  not  given  special  consideration.  Animal  units  p°r  month  (AITM's) 
per  allotment  will  not  increase  be  a result  of  thi6  timber  sale 

3 . RFMQVAL  OF  KESF  FROM  THE  TIMBER  BASE 

During  the  Forest  planning  process,  all  areas  of  key  elk  summer  range  on  th)6 
Forest  were  mapped.  A portion  of  these  areas  were  then  selected  to  receive 
a 4B  Management  Area  Prescription  which  places  management  emphasis  first  and 
foremost  on  elk  habitat  objectives.  The  amount  of  acres  given  the  4B 
prescription  was  sufficiently  large  to  provide  necessary  core  areas  for  eW 
which,  in  combination  with  surrounding  areas,  would  support  target  population 
established  in  the  Idaho  Department  of  Fi6h  and  Game  Species  Management  Plan 
for  elk. 

Alternative  6 ha6  been  listed  as  the  "PREFERRED*  Alternative  in  the  Final 
EIS.  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected”  Alternative  but  will  do  60  in  the 
Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review.  Please  have 
your  comments  back  to  us  in  30  day6 . 

Sincerely , 


JOHN  E . BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


Caring  for  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200-2Bb(V9 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 22 


MOYER  SALT  TIM 


August  8,  1992 

1135  East  Bonneville 
Pocatello,  Idaho  83201 


John  Burns,  Supervisor 
Salmon  National  Forest 
p.O.  Box  729 
Salmon,  Idaho  83467 


Ax lion  Q 


Dear  Mr.  Burns: 

RE:  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale 

I have  reviewed  the  alternatives  suggested  by  the  Forest 
Service  concerning  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale. 

My  overriding  concern  about  this  sale  is  the  3200  acre  area 
which  has  been  identified  as  Key  Elk  Summer  Range. 
Alternatives  2 and  4 , in  my  view,  will  severely  impact  elk. 
Alternative  4 is  the  most  destructive  of  the  proposed 
alternatives , allowing  cutting  in  and  road  buiiding  through 
the  middle  of  this  critical  area.  Alternative  2 isn  t mu 
better  with  similar  amounts  of  road  building  and  timber 
harvest  activities  in  the  Summer  Range  area. 

Alternative  3 provides  a compromise  between  timber  harvest 
and  elk  protection,  and  it  has  my  support. 


SALE 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


United  StateG 
Department  of 
Agriculture 


Forest 

Service 


Salmon 

National 

Forest 


P.O  Box  729 
Salmon,  ID  83467 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date  : 


Ron  Watters 

1135  East  Bonneville 

Pocatello,  ID  83201 


Dear  Mr  Watters: 

Thank  you  for  your  commentB  of  August  8,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale 
Your  commentG  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis  process  and 
have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource  specialists  Their 
idea6  are  the  basis  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and  comprise  the  rest 
of  this  letter. 

MAINTAIN  WILDLIFE  HABITAT 

All  proposed  action  alternatives  meet  the  Fore6t  Plan  Area  Prescription  for 
the  project  area  and  with  stated  mitigation  measures  will  result  in  port -sale 
habitat  conditions  that  are  compatible  with  the  Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and 
Game's  elk  population  goals  for  this  Game  Management  Unit.  Alternative  3 
will  have  the  least  impact  of  the  conventional  alternatives  on  the  mapped 
KESR  but  would  have  the  greatest  impact  on  the  excellent  elk  habitat  in  Salt 
Creek.  The  overall  effects  of  this  alternative  are  thus  very  similar  to 
those  predicted  for  several  others  such  as  2A. 

Alternative  6 ha6  been  listed  as  the  "PREFERRED*  Alternative  in  the  Final 
EIS.  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected"  Alternative  but  will  do  so  in  the 
Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review  Please  have 
your  comments  back  to  us  in  30  days. 

Sincerely, 


JOHN  E.  BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


Caring  lor  the  Land  and  Serving  People 

FS-6200-28b(3/92) 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 23 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


United  States 
Department  of 
Agriculture 


Forest 
Servi ce 


Salmon  P.0.  Box  729 

National  Salmon,  ID  83467 

Forest 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date  : 


Peter  Liporac 
Rt  3 

P.O.  Box  282 
Blackfoot,  ID  83221 


Dear  Mr.  Liporac: 

Thank  you  for  your  comments  of  August  7,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber 
Sale.  Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis 
process  and  have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource 
specialists.  Their  ideas  are  the  basi6  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and 
comprise  the  rest  of  this  letter. 

1 . MAINTAIN  WILDLIFE  HABITAT 

All  proposed  action  alternatives  contain  many  mitigation  measures  and 
management  requirements  designed  to  specifically  help  ensure  that  post-sale 
elk  habitat  is  adequate  to  help  support  the  elk  population  goal  of  the 
current  Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game's  5-Year  Elk  Species  Management 
Plan . 


2 . NO  LOGGING 

In  the  Salmon  National  Forest  Plan,  we  identified  lands  within  the  Moyer  Salt 
analysis  area  as  being  suitable  for  timber  harvest.  Through  this 
Environmental  Impact  Statement  process,  we  are  analyzing  an  array  of 
alternatives,  including  a No  Action  Alternative,  to  determine  the  level  of 
timber  harvest  that  best  meets  timber  goals  while  protecting  other 
resources . 

Alternative  6 has  been  listed  as  the  "PREFERRED*  Alternative  in  the  Final 
EIS . We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected”  Alternative  but  will  do  so  in  the 
Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review.  Please  have 
your  comments  back  to  us  in  30  day6 . 

Sincerely, 


JOHN  E . BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


Caring  for  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200-26b(3'92> 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 24 


irnoNt 
» 756-6293 


Salmon  Intermountain,  Inc. 


P.  O.  1IOX  928 

SALMON,  IDAHO  83467 


sTHiiirr  ad 

200  NUK  I II  U 


Sol  non  National  Forest 
Attn:  Lynn  Bennett 

DEIS  Response  - Moyer  Salt  Timber 

P.  0.  Box  7£9 

Sa 1 non,  1 D 839E7 


SAIMQN  N.  F, 

Rugust  10,  1993: 

AUG  3 0 :Jl 

l"'o  0 Aclron  tj 

SUP 

U'P  1 2 3 4 5 6 

TAF  1 2 3 4 5 G 

CIM  1 2 3 4 5 6 

IIKWW  1 2 3 4 5 6 

AO  123456 
CC's  TO: 


Dear  Mr.  Bennett: 


1 support  Alternative  #£,  the  proposed  action,  in  the 
Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  Draft  E n v i r o n m e n t a 1 Impact  Statement. 

1 feel  that  this  is  the  best  alternative,  because  it  provides 
raw  material  for  the  local  forest  products  industry  and 
protects  wildlife  and  fisheries  through  specific  best 
management  practices  for  logging  and  road  building. 


This  proposed  action  will  provide  an  estimated  9.9  MM 
board  feet  of  timber  to  the  local  forest  products  industry. 

This  local  industry  is  solely  dependent  on  the  National  Forest 
and  the  BLM  for  its  ran  material  supply. 

Salmon  Intermountain  is  one  of  the  largest  private  employers  in 
Lemhi  County,  and  needs  these  raw  materials  to  continue 
operat ing. 


Moyer  and  Woodt  ict  Creeks  are  important  streams  for 
anadromous  fish  species.  There  has  been  no  use  of  the  Wood- 
tick,  or  Moyer  creeks  by  anadromous  fish  since  the  1980’ 5,  due 
to  chemical  pollution  from  an  abandoned  mine  up  stream  from  the 
study  area.  This  will  continue  to  be  the  case  until  the  water 
contamination  from  the  Black  Bird  Mine  is  corrected. 


By  using  proven  best  management  practices  (BMP),  there  will 
be  no  degradation  to  the  current  and  future  fisheries  and  their 
habitat  in  the  study  area. 

BMP  for  road  construction:  - windrow  slash  at  the  toe  of 
the  slope  to  provide  for  a sediment  trap. 

- grass  seed  cut  and  fill  slopes  to  help  stabilize 
them. 

- place  water  bars  on  road  at  completion  of  harvest 
act  i v i t i e s. 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


United  States 

Forest 

Salmon 

P.O.  Box  729 

Department  of 

Service 

National 

Salmon,  ID  83467 

Agriculture 

Forest 

Reply'  to:  1950 

Date  : 


Dalian  Olnon 
President 

Salmon  Intermountain,  Inc. 
P.O.  Box  729 
Salmon,  ID  83467 


Dear  Mr.  Olson: 

Thanh  you  for  your  comments  of  August  10,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber 
Sale.  Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis 
process  and  have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource 
specialists.  Their  ideas  are  the  basis  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and 
comprise  the  rest  of  thiB  letter. 

1 . COMMUNITY  STABILITY 

Thank  you  for  your  support  of  our  proponed  alternative.  We  agree  that  timber 
harvest  plays  a key'  role  in  the  economic  future  of  Salmon.  The  demand  for 
timber  from  the  Salmon  National  Forest  and  parts  of  the  Cobalt  P.anaer 
District  has  been  strong  and  is  expected  to  increase.  One  objective  of  the 
Forest  Plan  is  to  provide  timber  outputs  at  a level  that  will  allow  the 
continuation  of  industries  dependent  on  those  outputs 

2 . CLOSURE  OF  THE  MOYEP.  PEAK  JEEP  TRAIL 

The  Moyer  Peak  Jeep  Trail  (06202)  would  remain  open  for  historical  access, 
except  for  the  spur  road  just  west  of  Moyer  Peak  in  the  SE1/4NW1/4  of 
Section  16.  This  spur  road  will  be  closed  by  creating  an  earthen  barrier 
that  prevents  vehicle  access. 

3 . TIMBER  SALES  AND  ROADLESS /WILDERNESS  ISSUES 

The  "Roadless  Area/Wi ldemess  Issue"  is  not  considered  appropriate  rationale 
for  "stopping  this  timber  harvest."  The  roadless  resource  is  included  in  the 
Draft  Environmental  Impact  Statement  (EIS)  as  an  affected  resource  and  the 
effects  of  the  various  alternatives  are  displayed  so  that  the  public  will 
understand  some  of  the  trade-offs  that  occur  when  development  occurs  in  a 
previously  undeveloped  area. 


Caring  (or  Ihe  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200  28MVQ2 


MOYER  SALT 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 24 


Salmon  National  Forest  Pape  £ August  10,  1 S92 

at  the  end  of  harvest!  Tig  activities  in  the  unit. 

— leave  lO  — £0  tons/acre  of  logging  slash  per  unit, 
this  will  not  on  1 y provide  f or  long  term  nutr  Sent 
recycling,  but  provide  woody  debris  for  sediment 
traps  throughout  the  harvest  unit  (short  term 
benefit). 

- maintain  adequate  filter  strips  adjacent  to  the 
streams. 

This  timber  sale  will  also  provide  money  to  the  Forest  Service 
to  realign  the  culvert  at  HoodticP  Creel<  and  F.S.  road  F 107. 
This  culvert  is  an  obstruct  i on  to  fish  migration  on  lloodt  iclt 
Creep.  If  anadromous  fish  ever  do  return  to  this  drainage,  it 
will  allow  them  to  reach  their  spawning  grounds  upstream. 

This  area  is  used  by  a wide  variety  of  wildlife.  To  help 
protect  the  wildlife  of  the  area,  all  harvesting  activities 
should  tape  place  behind  closed  gates.  This  will  allow 
logging,  hauling,  and  road  building  in  two  subdivisions  at  a 
time.  It  will  also  let  the  wildlife  use  the  remaining 
subdivisions  without  being  bothered  by  the  timber  sale 
activities.  Harvesting  some  of  the  timber  in  this  area  will 
open  up  new  forage  areas  for  wildlife,  thus  improving  overall 
habitat.  I feel  the  Moyer  Jeep  Trail  should  be  closed,  to 
prevent  motorized  vehicles  from  using  roads  that  are  behind  a 
locPed  gate. 

The  timber  in  this  study  area  is  infested  with  insect  and 
disease  problems  (spruce  budworm,  mountain  pine  beetle  , and 
dwarf  r i st  1 e-toe) . Harvesting  the  timber  in  this  area  will 
greatly  reduce  the  potential  for  a catastrophic  insect  and 
disease  infestation  and  resulting  timber  loss.  The  timber 
harvest  will  also  reduce  the  potential  for  a major'  fire  in  the 
area,  by  breaPing  up  the  continues  fuel  base,  providing  fire 
lines  (roads)  and  giving  the  Forest  Service  good  loaded  access 
t o the  area. 

The  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  will  lay  within  the  Taylor 
Mountain  Roadless  Area,  W13-908.  The  Roadless  Or e a /H i 1 d e rn e s s 
issue  should  not  be  grounds  for  stopping  this  timber  harvest. 
This  roadless  area  was  not  recommended  for  wilderness  in  RARE  1 
or  RORE  II,  nor  is  it  currently  listed  for  wilderness 
consideration  in  the  Salmon  Forest  Plan,  page  C - £ 4 . Only  IF’/, 
of  the  Roadless  Ores  will  be  affected,  leaving  approximately 
53,000  acres  in  a roadless  condition.  There  have  also  been 


SALE 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


Alternative  6 has  been  listed  an  the  " PREFERRED*  Alternative  in  the  Final 
EIS.  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected"  Alternative  but  will  do  so  in  the 
Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review.  Please  have 
your  comments  back  to  us  in  30  day6 . 

Sincerely, 


JOHN  E.  BUPJ1S 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


Cndnc  ’***  ! •'r'f4  pnc*  S**'1 


MOYER 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 25 


Jonn  R S«*an»on 
MOO  Edmund  Brvd. 

IfanoMpoUt,  MH  SS406 

I,\-mvA  T\ft^ 

?rO  In 

^i\-vtr-<A  gjMC^ 

f A»-\J|a>  -j 

^ ^ nr\'\. \.lL  w 

T'V'-^'a  /'Ur\Vt*A.i  t^<-  P#u\r^  r,r  V^v^f.-VA'.L-T’AiiCt 


0*>u  T\^^t->.  Y»tt  tu\»\v\Vn  (V^VN  tc.Cf VO  jlJL-Wioi.  % vJ  ► L [/  - 
^>'  >^*Y'  * ' 1 ''•'Kit'."-'1'  f vVf'-'N  ">\'Cu  vVkAAj'AM^Ac  ^ "tc. 

,Uti\.\<^vtK  y/Wi  un^ili, 

) FAY»\Vr<Y<-  . 

Y>  ..  'a^vA  >\  v U>-Aji->  (A  At.'  V xt  -tl  .r\  iA<^'  r\  i'*  i-' ,l^  i<\itlvi  t>  | 

f.i/i'A  A V C tA>  A'aA^  H-a'-V  »-A.  a)  «.L  f V-3  i\K'^a\^j'  l > 

ev.-v-,  a'a>ia^\  , /^U&L.^w^Jkc  . 

"”*A  c-  > *'  (j^A  jA  »A  f^ViAi  c^-Vl  ('y  <,(-.V>a  lv\n.\T|>\)-L  tVjOAi^LAi 

{\,CLAA»\a.vL^  ,10-AtV  T\t_  l \\M.l^-,iA.V>C^I  . 


Jk«t  i\cAia-  ^iL,  U'A>A* '. 

^ ftA\U AllX e^AA^  i_\\  ~t0 aK-A-AVA^^  '[[iA hf£\ ^5  o ■ 

\v,r^tlA(jiA-v^Aic.«^tLv'^r^\^  \nvvt.cfc«^fl«7r\*tL  ava-TWC^  , 

Pci^as^ITi  ^ fe-ixbcrw'iCttr  |\  x o^\  W jAA.A-\->'-<-:>A-(j  VU- AfAi’iCtl  ri\ 


Sa  *a«.a.t\a\.^. 


'^c-<V'f\rA  S ACT  '\%f“'\ 


i;L;;.::n;.  r. 


jut  15^-2 


Into  U Aii.on  d 

SUP - 

LHP  123456 

TAF  123456 

ELM  1 2 3 4 5 6 

PPWW  123456 

AO  1 2 3 4 5 6 


TIMBER  SALE 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


United  States  Forest 

Department  of  Service 

Agriculture 


Salmon 

National 

Forest 


P.O.  Box  729 
Salmon,  ID  83467 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date  : 


John  Swan6on 
3400  Edmund  Blvd 
Minneapolis,  MN  55406 


Dear  Mr.  Swanson: 

Thank  you  for  your  comments  of  August  7,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber 
Sale.  Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis 
process  and  have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource 
specialists.  Their  ideas  are  the  basis  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and 
comprise  the  rest  of  this  letter. 

ROADLESS  CONCERNS 

The  wilderness  allocation  issue  i6  addressed  by  the  Salmon  National  Forest 
Land  and  Resource  Management  Plan.  Thi6  Environmental  Impact  Statement 
(EIS) displays  the  effects  to  the  roadless  resource  of  the  No  Action 
Alternative  as  well  as  six  action  alternatives.  As  you  can  see  from  the 
analysis,  all  alternatives  leave  over  eighty  percent  of  the  Taylor  Mountain 
Roadless  Area  in  an  undeveloped  condition  for  the  foreseeable  future. 

We  are  also  concerned  about  other  resources  in  the  analysis  area  and  have 
fully  addressed  the  effects  to  these  in  Chapter  IV. 

Alternative  6 has  been  listed  as  the  "PREFERRED"  Alternative  in  the  Final 
EIS.  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected"  Alternative  but  will  do  so  in  the 
Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review.  Please  have 
your  comments  back  to  U6  in  30  days. 

Sincerely, 


JOHN  E.  BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


Caring  lor  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200-28M3/92I 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 26 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


August  10,  1992 


sajmqn  a F. 


Mr:  ] /,  > / 


John  Burns,  Forest  Supervisor 
Salmon  National  Forest 
F.O.  Box  729 
Salmon,  ID  83467 


Inlo  0 

SUP 

IMP 
JAF 
ll  M 


Re: 


PRWV/ 

Input  on  Draft  Environmental  Impact  Statement  (1)£IS) 
for  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale,  ccvro- 


AUkm  [J 


1 2 3 4 5 6 
l 2 3 4 5 G 
1 2 3 4 5 6 
1 2 3 4 5 6 
1 2 3 4 5 G 


Dear  Mr.  Burns: 


This  letter  contains  my  comments  and  recommendations  on  the  above- 
referenced  DEIS  for  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  in  the  Panther 
Creek,  drainage  of  the  Cobalt  Ranger  District.  Please  consider  my 
input  and  include  this  letter  in  the  appropriate  administrative 
record. 


At  the  outset,  please  oppose  and  reject  alternatives  2 and  6 . 

These  alternatives  would  allow  logging  and  road  construction 
through  the  middle  of  the  3,200-acre  tract  of  key  elk  summer  range. 
This  tract  was  inventoried  in  the  early  1980s  during  the  forest 
planning  process,  and  it  is  optimum  elk  habitat  supporting  a 
relatively  large  number  of  elk.  Alternatives  2 and  4 violate  the 
-j  Forest  Service  recommendation  that  "timber  harvest  on  key  elk  habi- 
tats should  be  limited  to  those  activities  that  will  maintain  or 
enhance  the  habitat  for  that  particular  elk  use."  (From  Elk 
Habitat  Relationships  for  Centra  1 Idaho)  In  short,  implementation 
oT  either  alternative  2 or  4 wouTd'be  disastrous  for  these  elk  and 
contrary  to  Forest  Service  policy. 

Alternative  3 is  the  only  DEIS  action  alternative  which  reasonably 
accommodates  the  needs  of  elk  and  their  habitat.  This  alternative 
also  shows  the  most  favorable  economic  efficiency  based  on  its 
Present  Net  Value.  In  addition,  alternative  3 is  considered  a 
compromise  and  is  reportedly  endorsed  by  Idaho  conservationists. 

I further  request  and  recommend  that  all  of  the  inventoried  Key 

2 Elk  Summer  Range  be  removed  from  the  timber  base.  In  the  future, 
logging  should  be  allowed  on  the  least-sensitive  lands  or  where 
habitat  fragmentation  is  already  present,  while  the  most  sensitive 
wildlife  habitats  and  those  with  good  connectivity  should  be  fully 
protected. 

There  are  other  important  issues  in  this  DEIS.  For  example,  the 

3 Moyer  Peak  Jeep  Trail  (Ho.  6202)  should  be  closed  throughout 
Section  15.  This  would  provide  the  most  enforceable  and  effective 
protection.  In  addition,  new  roads  may  encourage  additional  cattle 

. use,  which  may  conflict  with  elk.  Fences  and  cattle  guards  should  be 
^ constructed  at  all  critical  points  to  prevent  such  conflicts. 


United  States  Forest 

Department  of  Service 

Agricul ture 


Salmon 

National 

Forest 


P.0  Box  729 
Salmon,  ID  83467 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date  : 


June  Ringer 

129  E Fairview  Avenue  Apt  2 
Glendale,  CA  91207 


Dear  Mb . Ringer : 

Thank  you  for  your  comments  of  August  10,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber 
Sale.  Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis 
process  and  have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource 
specialists.  Their  ideas  are  the  basis  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and 
comprise  the  rest  of  this  letter. 

1 . INCONSISTENCY  WITH  FOREST  SERVICE  POLICY  REGARDING  CUTTING  TIMBER 
IN  KESR 

The  document,  "Elk  Habitat  Relationships  for  Central  Idaho",  contains  good 
information  concerning  management  of  elk  habitat.  Portions  of  this  document 
were  adopted  in  the  Forest  Plan.  These  management  standards  and  guidelines 
help  accomplish  specific  goals  in  areas  that  received  "Key  Elk"  (4A  or  4B) 
management  prescriptions  in  the  Forest  Plan. 

Our  particular  timber  sale,  however,  contains  cutting  units  within  areas  that 
received  3A  anadromous  fish  habitat  prescriptions  and  5A,  5B  and  5C  timber 
management  prescriptions  in  the  Forest  Plan,  rather  than  the  "Key  Elk" 
prescriptions.  Any  selected  action  alternative,  however,  would  meet  Forest 
Plan  Wildlife  Standards  and  Guidelines  for  wildlife  prescriptions. 

2 . REMOVAL  OF  KESR  FROM  THE  TIMBER  BASE 

During  the  Forest  planning  process,  all  areas  of  key  elk  summer  range  on  thi6 
Forest  were  mapped.  A portion  of  these  areas  were  then  selected  to  receive 
a 4 B Management  Area  Prescription  which  places  management  emphasis  first  and 
foremost  on  elk  habitat  objectives.  The  amount  of  acres  given  the  4B 
prescription  was  sufficiently  large  to  provide  necessary  core  areas  for  elk 
which,  in  combination  with  surrounding  areas,  would  support  target  population 
established  in  the  Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game's  Species  Management 
Plan  for  elk. 


Caring  for  the  Land  and  Serving  People 

FS-6200-28M3  92) 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 26 


Salmon  National  Forest  Resoonse 


2. 


Again,  please  support,  adopt  and  Implement  alternative  3 and  other- 
wise work  for  the  effective  protection  of  the  Key  Elk  Summer  Range. 

Thank  you  very  much  tor  considering  my  views. 


S lncerely , 


/June  Rlnge 


;r 


129  East  Fatrview  Avenue,  Apt.  2 
Glendale,  CA  91207 


A/  June  Ringer  2. 

3 . CLOSURE  OF  THE  MOYER  PEAK  JEEP  TRAIL 

The  Moyer  Peak  Jeep  Trail  ( 6 2 0 2 ) would  remain  open  for  historical  accpre, 
except  for  the  spur  road  just  west  of  Moyer  Peak  in  the  SE1/4NW1/4  of 
Section  16.  This  6pur  road  will  be  closed  by  creating  an  earthen  barrier 
that  prevents  vehicle  access 

4 . RESTRICTION  OF  LIVESTOCK  WITH  FENCES  AMD  CATTLE GUARDS 

We  are  committed  to  install  cattleguards  on  new  roads  whenever  they  crosF  an 
existing  fence.  There  are  presently  no  fences  in  the  Moyer  Salt  analysis 
area,  so  we  have  not  planned  any  cattleguards  on  the  roads 

When  the  Forest  Plan  was  developed,  grazing  allotments,  wildlife  boundaries, 
and  forage  production  capabilities  were  used  to  establish  livestock  grazing 
limits  at  levels  to  prevent  livestock/wildlife  conflicts.  By  increasing  the 
available  area  within  a given  allotment  with  the  same  number  of  cattle,  the 
result  ie  a dispersal  of  livestock.  This  reduces  concentrated  use  in  a 
specific  area  and  thu6  improves  the  general  range  condition,  resulting  in 
better  habitat  for  both  the  livestock  and  wildlife.  The  key  elk  summer  rang 
areas  are  not  given  special  consideration.  Animal  units  per  month  (AUM's) 
per  allotment  will  not  increase  as  a result  of  this  timber  sale 

Alternative  6 has  been  listed  as  the  "PREFERRED"  Alternative  in  the  Final 
EIS.  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected"  Alternative  but  will  do  sc  in  th 
Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review.  Pleasr  have 
your  comments  back  to  us  in  30  day6 . 

Sincerely. 


JOHN  E . BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


Caring  lor  Ihe  Land  and  Serving  People 


rS-f?on 


MOYER  SALT 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 27 


3 

4 


fr<.F57--S Of?£A^ 

5/  l-  *’7  / /L.  Aj/7  /t?  S £-3  7" 

n/t**?  ZT/O  A/0  £a  acL,AsC-  fcccsn  - 

' /t  ,/i/«j-  4a/_  yi*-&'/*7c  S*  77^7<5iT/i  Srf  <-  c rf*  £r#  •'  */£r 

^T>-  fla0/U£-  / 

,T/=  /-A-t?  "ti/>bir.Os£  u &'>'? £/v~  " Ty/’&s  fate? 

lc  <KJ6-  fic-Re^  C°  U/i  vc-  3 33/  Me1 

i ^ 

jjysS.  /9-^-e-' < a,  * >-/ u a /}^o  Y t/,c£,t r /-£^<£^r~ 

52AV/C£  /?<?  (_£./>?  S>7  G-As  D /V  /Vt/zt/S  /V/t  X o--/  £i-S:  r* T 

filsr^/i ■ £ £ y>7  £--As>Ck  ■j&O-'/VE-^. 

Clc  sz£  TvJ-y y?c /<5^  Cx-Cr£'* - 33ev=>  3fA?  / 4. . 
Cc'VShK  l'Cy/~  C^w-cWaWas  /y./o  ys-fUCcs  A~ 

'' Cai7iw l ^ / a/  >~s  yo  c^t &/?-$>  yyi  Cs^ 

...ft'3'JSiyOf'  FTt £^7? ■ 1_. 

/y  — <3  — y^/ 

v 

//YY/  /u-ttYa  Yu 

YY  £y,yyjx£'£yYY> 

- 3^5  YYs 


] /;  I 1 


SALE 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


United  States  Forest 

Department  of  Service 

Agriculture 


Salmon 

National 

Forest 


P.0.  Box  729 
Salmon.  ID  83467 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date  : 


Katie  Fite 
11541  Lloyd  Lane 
Caldwell,  ID  83605 


Dear  Ms.  Fite: 

Thank  you  for  your  comments  of  August  9,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber 
Sale.  Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis 
process  and  have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource 
specialists.  Their  ideas  are  the  basis  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and 
comprise  the  rest  of  this  letter. 

1 . NO  LOGGING 

In  the  Salmon  National  Forest  Plan,  we  identified  lands  within  the  Moyer  Salt 
analysis  area  as  being  suitable  for  timber  harvest.  Through  this 
Environmental  Impact  Statement  process,  we  are  analyzing  an  array  of 
alternatives,  including  a No  Action  Alternative,  to  determine  the  level  of 
timber  harvest  that  best  meets  timber  goals  while  protecting  other 
resources . 

2 . INCONSISTENCY  WITH  FOREST  SERVICE  POLICY  REGARDING  CUTTING  TIMBER 
IN  KESR 

"Key  Elk"  (4A  or  4B)  management  prescriptions  in  the  Forest  Plan  emphasize 
management  of  big  game  habitat  in  winter  and  summer  ranges.  Our  particular 
timber  sale  contains  cutting  units  within  areas  that  received  3A  anadromous 
fish  habitat  prescriptions  and  5A,  5B  and  5C  timber  management  prescription 
in  the  Forest  Plan,  not  the  "Key  Elk"  prescriptions. 

Any  selected  action  alternative,  however,  would  meet  Forest  Plan  Wildlife 
Standards  and  Guidelines  for  wildlife  prescriptions. 

3 • CLOSURE  OF  THE  MOYEP.  PEAK  JEEP  TRAIL 

The  Moyer  Peak  Jeep  Trail  (86202)  would  remain  open  for  historical  access, 
except  for  the  spur  road  just  west  of  Moyer  Peak  in  the  SE1/4NW1/4  of 
Section  16.  This  spur  road  will  be  closed  by  creating  an  earthen  barrier 
that  prevents  vehicle  access. 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 27 


Salmon  National 


Forest  Response 


Katie  Fite 


4 . RESTRICTION  OF  LIVESTOCK  WITH  FENCES  AND  CATTLE  GUARDS 

We  are  committed  to  install  cattleguards  on  new  roads  whenever  they  cross  an 
existing  fence.  There  are  presently  no  fences  in  the  Moyer  Salt  analysis 
area,  60  we  have  not  planned  any  cattleguards  on  the  roads. 

When  the  Fore6t  Plan  was  developed,  grazing  allotments,  wildlife  boundaries, 
and  forage  production  capabilities  were  used  to  establish  livestock,  grazing 
limits  at  levels  to  prevent  livestock/wildlife  conflicts.  By  increasing  the 
available  area  within  a given  allotment  with  the  same  number  of  cattle,  the 
result  is  a dispersal  of  livestock.  Thi6  reduces  concentrated  use  in  a 
specific  area  and  thus  improves  the  general  range  condition,  resulting  in 
better  habitat  for  both  the  livestock  and  wildlife.  The  key  elk  summer  rang" 
areas  are  not  given  special  considerat ion . Animal  units  per  month  (AUM's) 
per  allotment  will  not  increase  as  a result  of  this  timber  6ale . 

Alternative  6 ha6  been  listed  as  the  "PREFERRED*  Alternative  in  the  Final 
EIS.  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected"  Alternative  but  will  do  so  in  the 
Record  of  Decision  Enclosed  is  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review.  Pleas**  have 
your  comments  back  to  us  in  30  days. 

Sincerely, 


JOHN  E . BORNS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


Caring  for  fhe  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200  2Sb( * ° 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 28 

'X 


O 


0 


\jLUC 


V. 


COXV  vvjJ-X>ijLv\Cj  0-0  Wv^-  OVTC^CuAC 


X°  \^\  c v\jL-\.  o»o3  "AAjuyvX^'l.-  'Ocv-^- 


Qj^UJL.  OYTXX  cVjl  \ L 


O-tv 


Jul; 


,WJUV/v 


3 


_Uj±_LO  Cy^ 

CaxA  ", 

^_lve  C^OVO'\AV_.oirjLOO^^:"5 


O v(0  o\\uuj< 

vj)(V  oJ-'V-O 


^ O £X  - Vlv^_!,1^l\^)n:\S>  UX  cOCOa-  v 

l\  (XOUOOfcA/v^  Cxa^  A '0^c^v^'Vcd!^^  X U-YO^YCXA-O 


A oJA 


ll/O- vAxtlCiJcVAv.  y.  lVV&GT.  C'-^vtAvJ—  oA  CL  v\A  vjYWCLS— 

COb-vjL,^  vXVLLcV  L,  . Vet  Aktx^x-  O-VtA;  vOio-O-f-'OciijO  Vo  Ut 
JjO  ^tetn  JatcviiXuj,  oJojivt-  o\vjj^A  Xo  CyjuxAt^ 

Of.cU.vA-  0\5YX/5VL,VJ1(L  . M\  CVjTJL  vLUCA,- 

Vic^u^-fotA  ox-ui  p^U&^cWvv-  oA  COV^toa^. 

r“\s  l el  AtoXAcxA  - alwiuo  V\cuk  pWu*^- 

OaxA  Xvb\w  ^\dg\\cJ  aopc-v\jL\ccO-  'Ai/VaA  Qjg|^O^U_ 

CvMC\  eaXlo  ojvl  o^ov^djroJAU-  . UWc. 

OA,W^  ,cx^<k  > 

(\rO_  v|  ,a  OOL  vjltv^coVolnoV  O^fir  UjjvVcAJ^'  jJ-  XvUnJcx. 

Fo\  oVvJi-'O-  V/VS-OlGOAO  A>  xW&LLVO_  OUlo,  'Pcrioj-  ! 

a,  ii ruvbdO-  qIUguAX  tuai  A jA  . A>  . ' 


lAV^b^- 

0 v -,  , f 


olvvcjlojUaj^  t r 0. 

Oc  o.^ovvoi-  a 


X.OC 
a n 


; 

\y 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


United  States 
Department  of 
Agriculture 


Forest 

Service 


Salmon  P.0  Box  729 

National  Salmon,  ID  83467 

Forest 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date  : 


Mike  and  Jeanne  Stanford 
Cliffs  Rt 

Jordan  Valley,  OR  97910 


Dear  Mr.  and  Mrs.  Stanford: 

Thank  you  for  your  comments  of  August  4,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber 
Sale.  Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis 
process  and  have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource 
specialists . 

Thanks  for  your  vote  of  confidence  in  our  management  of  the  Forest.  All 
resources  our  important  to  us  and  we  have  disclosed  the  effects  of  timber 
harvesting  and  road  building  on  each.  We  will  continue  to  do  our  best  in 
managing  all  the  resources  on  the  Forest  and  fulfill  our  mission,  including 
to  provide  a continuous  flow  of  raw  materials  to  the  community  and  thus 
encourage  economic  stability. 

Alternative  6 has  been  listed  as  the  "PREFERRED*  Alternative  in  the  Final 
Environmental  Impact  Statement  EIS.  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected" 
Alternative  but  will  do  so  in  the  Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the  Final 
EIS  for  your  review.  Please  have  your  comments  back  to  us  in  30  day6 . 

Sincerely, 


JOHN  E.  BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


CaMnp  for  the  I.  and  P^d  Serving  pf'r  r,P 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 29 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


August  7,  1992 


United  States  Forest 

Department  of  Service 

\fy/J  Agriculture 


Salmon 

National 

Forest 


P.0.  Box  729 
Salmon,  ID  83467 


John  Burns,  Supervisor 
Salmon  National  Forest 
P.0.  Box  729 
Salmon,  ID  834G7 


Mr.  Burns, 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date : 


I am  writing  to  express  my  concerns  about  the  Moyer  Salt  I imber  sale. 

Alter  reviewing  the  DEIS,  1 would  Like  to  make  the  following  comments. 

1.  Alternatives  2 and  4 appear  to  damage  the  very  heart  of  the  area’s  elk 
summer  range.  These  areas  should  be  left  for  the  benefit  of  the  elk. 

2.  Alternative  3 protects  the  elk  while  still  allowing  logging  on  the  least 
sensitive  lands.  All  inventoried  elk  summer  range  should  be  excluded 
from  the  timber  base. 

3.  To  prevent  incursions  of  cattle  into  elk  areas  it  is  important  to 
provide  fencing  and  cattleguards  to  minimize  conflicts  between  cattle 
and  elk. 

Thanks  for  the  opportunity  to  express  these  views. 


Joel  Tinsley 
54  South  St. 

Blackfoot,  LD  83221 

SMtta.N  u.  f. 


fir.  17 


Info  0 
SUP 

Action  C 

IMP 

1 

2 

3 

4 5 i 

TAF 

2 

3 

4 5 • 

ELM 

i 

2 

3 

4 5 

FRWV/ 

i 

2 

3 

4 5 

AO 

CCs  TO: 

i 

2 

3 

4 5 

Joel  Tinsley 
54  South  Street 
Blackfoot,  ID  83221 


Dear  Mr.  Tinsley: 

Thank  you  for  your  comments  of  August  7,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber 
Sale.  Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis 
process  and  have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource 
specialists.  Their  ideas  are  the  basis  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and 
comprise  the  rest  of  this  letter. 

1 . MAINTAIN  WILDLIFE  HABITAT 

Analyses  quantifying  post-sale  elk  habitat  conditions  were  completed  for  all 
alternatives  and  are  summarized  in  Table  IV-8  on  page  IV-38  of  the 
Environmental  Impact  Statement  (EIS) . These  data  indicate  a slight  increase 
in  elk  habitat  potential  in  Area  II  and  a slight  decrease  in  Area  I with  a 
net  result  very  near  current.  There  will,  however,  be  a decrease  in  elk 
habitat  security  and  an  increase  in  vulnerability  of  hunted  elk.  However, 
thi6  area  will  not  by  any  means  be  devastated  and  will  remain  in  very 
acceptable  elk  habitat  condition  post-sale. 

All  proposed  action  alternatives  contain  many  mitigation  measures  and 
management  requirements  designed  to  specifically  help  ensure  that  post-sale 
elk  habitat  is  adequate  to  help  support  the  elk  population  goal  of  the 
current  Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game's  (IDF&G)  5-Year  Elk  Species 
Management  Plan. 

2 . REMOVAL  OF  KESR  FROM  THE  TIMBER  BASE 

During  the  Forest  planning  process,  all  areas  of  key  elk  summer  range  on  this 
Forest  were  mapped.  A portion  of  these  areas  were  then  selected  to  receive 
a 4 B Management  Area  Prescription  which  places  management  emphasis  first  and 
foremost  on  elk  habitat  objectives.  The  amount  of  acres  given  the  4B 
prescription  was  sufficiently  large  to  provide  necessary  core  areas  for  elk 
which,  in  combination  with  surrounding  areas,  would  support  target  population 
established  in  the  IDF&G  Species  Management  Plan  for  elk. 


m 


Caring  for  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


1 c.  r :np  :9hn 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 29 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


Joel  Tinsley 


3 . RESTRICTION  OF  LIVESTOCK  WITH  FENCES  AND  CATTLEGUAP.DS 

We  are  committed  to  install  cattleguarcn  on  new  roads  whenever  they  cross  an 
existing  fence.  There  are  presently  nc  fences  in  the  Moyer  Salt  analysis 
area,  so  we  have  not  planned  any  cattleguards  on  the  road6 . 

When  the  Forest  Plan  was  developed,  grazing  allotments,  wildlife  boundaries, 
and  forage  production  capabilities  were  used  to  establish  livestock  grazing 
limits  at  levels  to  prevent  livestock/wildlife  conflicts.  By  increasing  the 
available  area  within  a given  allotment  with  the  same  number  of  cattle,  the 
result  is  a dispersal  of  livestock.  This  reduces  concentrated  use  in  a 
specific  area  and  thu6  improves  the  general  range  condition,  resulting  in 
better  habitat  for  both  the  livestock  and  wildlife.  The  key  elk  summer  range 
areas  are  not  given  special  consideration.  Animal  units  per  month  (AUM's) 
per  allotment  will  not  increase  as  a result  of  thi6  timber  sale. 

Alternative  6 has  been  listed  as  the  "PREFERRED*  Alternative  in  the  Final 
EIS.  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected"  Alternative  but  will  do  so  in  the 
Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  i6  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review.  Please  have 
your  comments  back  to  us  in  30  days. 

Sincerely, 


JOHN  E . BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


O’»"0 


and  Serving  Fpopi 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 30 

Salmon  National 

Forest  Response 

DRS.  IRWIN  & LOHMANN 

United  States  Forest 

Department  of  Service 

Agriculture 

Salmon  P.O.  Box  729 

National  Salmon,  ID  83467 

ForeBt 

1 12  Wesl  Fifth 
Jerome.  Idaho  83338 
Telephone:  (208)  324-1157 

Reply  to:  1950 

Date  : 

August  7 , 1992 


James  Irwin 
112  West  Fifth 
Jerome,  ID  83338 


John  Burns,  Supervisor 
Salmon  National  Forest 
P.O.  Box  729 
Salmon , ID  83467 

Dear  Mr.  Burns: 


This  is  a letter  in  regards  to  pro- 
posed timber  sale  in  the  Key  Elk 
-j  summer  range.  I am  very  concerned 
about  the  possibility  of  new  road 
construction  affecting  this  summer 
range,  particularly  since  increased 
road  access  has  been  consistently 
and  repetatively  shown  to  have  a 
detriment  on  the  elk  herds.  For 
that  reason,  I support  alternative 
three  as  described  in  the  draft 
environment  impact  statement. 


SALMON  N.  F. 


f : |P  ^ J O 


Into  0 
1 1.1  p 


Action  Q 


Dear  Mr.  Irvin: 

Thank  you  for  your  comments  of  August  7,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber 
Sale.  Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis 
process  and  have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource 
specialists.  Their  ideas  are  the  basis  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and 
comprise  the  rest  of  this  letter. 

MAINTAIN  WILDLIFE  HABITAT 

For  all  alternatives,  the  entire  road  system  constructed  for  thi6  sale  will 
be  gated  and  administratively  closed  to  motorized  traffic.  In  addition,  the 
road  through  the  KESR  will  have  slash  piled  on  it  to  discourage  and/or 
eliminate  human  travel  by  foot  or  horse.  Thi6  will  negate  or  greatly 
decrease  any  predicted  effects  due  to  roading. 

Alternative  6 has  been  listed  as  the  "PREFERRED*  Alternative  in  the  Final 
EIS.  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected"  Alternative  but  will  do  so  in  the 
Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review.  Please  have 
your  comments  back  to  ue  in  30  days. 

Sincerely, 


JOHN  E.  BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


JSI/lls 


1 2 3 4 5 G 


Caring  lor  Ihe  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-f.200  2cH(VQ2I 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 31 


P.O.  Box  8787 
Moscow,  ID  83843 
10  August  1992 


Forest  Supervisor 
Salmon  National  Forest 
P.O.  Box  729 
Salmon,  ID  83467 

Dear  John: 

Thank  you  for  letting  me  respond  to  the  draft  EIS  for  the 
Moyer  Salt  timber  sale  on  the  Cobalt  District.  I have  been 
visiting  Panther  Creek  quite  regularly  (even  in  its  cobalt 
blue  phase)  for  the  past  twenty  or  so  years,  and  value  it 
highly. 

I doubt  very  much  that  Alt.  4 in  this  EIS  can  be  legally 

1 adopted,  since  it  hopelessly  contradicts  most  of  the  rather 
weak  Forest  Plan  standards.  In  any  case,  it  builds  far  too 

2 many  roads  and  harvests  way  too  much  timber  in  elk  habitat. 

Alt.  3 still  builds  way  too  many  roads,  but  at  least  does 
its  very  best  to  avoid  the  planning  area's  most  useful 
_ wildlife  habitat.  This  alternative  also  includes  a very 
^ useful  jeep  road  closure,  near  Moyer  Peak.  Given  the  general 
failure  of  overall  machine  use  planning  on  the  Salmon,  it's 
at  least  good  to  see  this  kind  of  site-specific  vehicle 
planning  in  action. 

It's  also  crucial  in  your  final  decision  making  for  this 
4 area  to  insure  that  the  new  roads  built  do  not  get  opened  to 
cattle  use,  and  above  tall,  that  they  are  built  to  low 
standards  and  then  kept  closed  to  all  machines.  The  very 
last  thing  that  the  Salmon  National  Forest  needs  is  more 
open  roads. 

Please  send  me  the  final  EIS  when  it  is  published. 


Info  0 

A:hc.i  0 

r.up 

imp 

1 2 

3 4 5 ( 

TAF 

1 2 

3 4 5 ( 

ELM 

1 2 

3 4 5 ( 

RRWW 

1 2 

3 4 5 1 

Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


United  StateB 
Department  of 
Agriculture 


ForeBt  Salmon 

Service  National 

Forest 


P.O.  Box  729 
Salmon,  ID  83467 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date  : 


Dennis  Baird 
P.O.  Box  8787 
Moscow,  ID  83843 


Dear  Mr.  Baird: 


Thank  you  for  your  consents  of  August  10,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber 

nro  a ^OTmenCG  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis 

process  and  have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource 

comorise^rh  Their,ide"  8re  th*  baBia  our  response  to  your  concerns  and 

comprise  the  reBt  of  this  letter. 


1 . 


IV  KESR 


^consistency  with  forest  service  policy  regarding  nrrriNG  timber 


■Key  Elk-  (4A  or  4B)  management  prescriptions  in  the  Forest  Plan  emphasize 
management  of  big  game  habitat  in  winter  and  summer  ranoes . Our  particular 
timber  sale  contains  cutting  units  within  areas  that  received  3A  anadromous 
fish  habitat  prescriptions  and  5A,  SB  and  SC  timber  manaoement  prescription 
in  the  Forest  Plan,  not  the  -Key  Elk-  prescriptions. 


Any  selected  action  alternative,  however,  would  meet  Forest  Plan  Wildlife 
Standards  and  Guidelines  for  wildlife  prescriptions. 

2 ■ maintain  wii.dt.tff  habitat 

Alternative  4 is  the  most  intensive  of  the  proposed  timber  manaa-ment 
However'  elk  habit»c  potential  in  the  mapped  KESR  (i  e 

^ u W°Uld  th?  "OBt  Und?r  thiG  Alternative 

(Table  IV-8) . Elk  habitat  potential  in  Area  I would  decrease,  but  the  net 
effect  would  be  very  near  neutral. 

the  enti"  r°8d  ByEtem  constructed  for  this  sale  -ill 
road  th  t a*niniBtratlvely  Closed  to  motorized  traffic.  In  addition,  the 
road  through  the  KESR  will  have  slash  piled  on  it  to  discouraqe  and/or 
eliminate  human  travel  by  foot  or  horse.  This  will  negate  or  oreatly 
decrease  any  predicted  effects  due  to  roading. 


Cprina  for  I rnj  pn*  ^„fv;nQ  poorir 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 31 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


Dennis  Baird 


3 . CLOSURE  OF  THE  MOYER  PEAK  JEEP  TRAIL 


2 


The  Moyer  Peak  Jeep  Trail  (86202)  would  remain  open  for  historical  access, 
except  for  the  spur  road  just  west  of  Moyer  Peak  in  the  SE1/4NW1/4  of 
Section  16.  This  spur  road  will  be  closed  by  creating  an  earthen  barriex 
that  prevents  vehicle  access. 


4 . RESTRICTION  OF  LIVESTOCK  WITH  FENCES  AND  CATTLE GUARDS 


We  are  committed  to  install  cattleguards  on  new  road6  whenever  they  cro66  an 
existing  fence.  There  are  presently  no  fences  in  the  Moyer  Salt  analysis 
area,  so  we  have  not  planned  any  cattleguards  on  the  roads 


When  the  Forest  Plan  was  developed,  grazing  allotments,  wildlife  boundai les, 
and  forage  production  capabilities  were  used  to  establish  livestock  grazing 
limits  at  levels  to  prevent  1 ive6tock/wildlif e conflicts  By  increasing  the 
available  area  within  a given  allotment  with  the  same  number  of  cattle,  the 
result  is  a dispersal  of  livestock.  This  reduces  concentrated  use  in  a 
specific  area  and  thus  improves  the  general  range  condition,  resulting  in 
better  habitat  for  both  the  livestock  and  wildlife.  The  key  elk  summer  range 
areas  are  not  given  special  consideration.  Animal  units  per  month  (AUM' s) 
per  allotment  will  not  increase  a6  a result  of  this  timber  sale 

Alternative  6 has  been  listed  as  the  "PREFERRED"  Alternative  in  the  Final 
EIS.  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected"  Alternative  but  will  do  so  in  the 
Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review.  Please  have 
your  comments  back  to  U6  in  30  day6 . 


Sincerely, 


JOHN  E . BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


Caring  lor  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


rS-6200  2Sb(3  9 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 32 


"How  Many  Brahms  Symphonies  Do  We  Need?’1 


\ATien  Bob  Marshall,  the  first  Recreation  Director  ot  the  U S Forest  Service  was  asked  how  much  wilderness  \ 
eeded.  he  replied.  'How  many  Brahms  symphonies  do  we  need  V Wilderness  areas,  like  great  symphonies  are  not 
rested  by  a simple  blink  ol  an  eye  nor  one  stroke  of  a pen  They  are  established  over  a long  penod  of  time  by  the 
imarkable  foresight  and  the  tireless  energy  of  a tew  personalities  -jt  u f 


August  10,  1992 


John  Burns,  Supervisor 
Salmon  National  Forest 
p.O.  Box  729 
Salmon,  ID  83467 


Be:  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale 
Dear  Mr.  Burns: 

This  letter  concerns  the  proposed  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  in  the  Taylor 
Mountain  Roadless  Area. 

I support  Alternative  3 which  would  protect  critical  wildlife  habitat.  All 
Key  elk  summer  range  should  be  removed  from  the  Salmon  Forest  timber  base, 

2 In  addition,  please  close  the  Moyer  Peak  jeep  trail  6202  at  section  15.  If 
cattle  grazing  is  going  to  occur  in  the  area  which  is  slated  to  be  logged,  then 

3 cattleguards  and  fences  need  to  be  constructed  to  prevent  conflicts  with  elk. 

The  Salmon  Forest  needs  to  more  carefully  consider  its  role  as  a steward  of 
the  land  and  its  wildlife,  rather  than  champion  extractive  uses  first. 

A few  years  ago  I was  in  Washington,  D.C.  A fellow  Idahoan  was  describing 
the  difference  between  hunting  an  Oregon  elk  and  an  Idaho  elk.  An  Idaho  elk,  he 
said,  is  a large  animal,  with  wide  branching  antlers  --  a mighty  beast  to 
behold.  Unfortunately,  an  Oregon  elk  is  usually  a spike,  a animal  barely  past 
be.i.g  a calf.  The  difference  is  that  Oregon  forests  have  largely  been  logged  and 
roaded,  reducing  elk  habitat  and  security  cover  during  hunting  season.  However, 
in  Idaho,  there  are  still  large  tracts  of  roadless  lands,  and  also  four  million 
acres  of  designated  Wilderness.  Elk  still  have  a chance  to  grow  old  in  some 
parts  of  Idaho.  I hope  the  Salmon  Forest  will  continue  to  be  one  of  them. 

Sincerely, 

hynne  Stone 
Box  3519 

Ketchum,  ID  83340 


AUG  19  — 


Info  0 

SUP 

IMP 
1AF 
ELM 
RRYYW 
AO 


Aclion  CJ 

1 2 9 4 5 6 
1 * 3 4 5 6 
1 2 3 4 5 6 
1 2 3 4 5 6 
1 2 3 4 5 6 


-t 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


United  States 
Department  of 
Agriculture 


Forest 

Service 


Salmon 

National 

Forest 


P.O.  Box  729 
Salmon,  ID  83467 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date  : 


Lynne  Stone 
P.  O.  Box  3519 
Ketchum,  ID  83340 


Dear  M6 . Stone: 

Thank  you  for  your  comments  of  August  19,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber 
Sale.  Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis 
process  and  have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource 
specialists.  Their  ideas  are  the  basis  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and 
comprise  the  rest  of  this  letter. 

1 . REMOVAL  OF  KESR  FROM  THE  TIMBER  BASE 

During  the  Forest  planning  process,  all  areas  of  key  elk  summer  range  on  this 
Forest  were  mapped.  A portion  of  these  areas  were  then  selected  to  receive 
a 4 B Management  Area  Prescription  which  places  management  emphasis  fir6t  and 
foremost  on  elk  habitat  objectives.  The  amount  of  acres  given  the  4B 
prescription  was  sufficiently  large  to  provide  necessary  core  areas  for  elk 
which,  in  combination  with  surrounding  areas,  would  support  target  population 
established  in  the  Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game's  Species  Management 
Plan  for  elk. 

2 . CLOSURE  OF  THE  MOYER  PEAK  JEEP  TRAIL 

The  Moyer  Peak  Jeep  Trail  (£6202)  would  remain  open  for  historical  accesB, 
except  for  the  spur  road  just  west  of  Moyer  Peak  in  the  SE1/4NW1/4  of 
Section  16.  This  spur  road  will  be  closed  by  creating  an  earthen  barrier 
that  prevents  vehicle  access. 

3 . RESTRICTION  OF  LIVESTOCK  WITH  FENCES  AND  CATTLEGUARDS 

We  are  committed  to  install  cattleguards  on  new  roads  whenever  they  cross  an 
existing  fence.  There  are  presently  no  fences  in  the  Moyer  Salt  analysis 
area,  so  we  have  not  planned  any  cattleguards  on  the  roads. 

When  the  Forest  Plan  was  developed,  grazing  allotments,  wildlife  boundaries, 
and  forage  production  capabilities  were  used  to  establish  livestock  grazing 
limits  at  levels  to  prevent  livestock/wildlife  conflicts.  By  increasing  the 


Caring  lor  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200-28b(3/92) 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 32 


Salmon  National 


Forest  Response 


Lynne  Stone 


available  area  within  a given  allotment  with  the  Game  number  of  cattle, 
result  i6  a dispersal  of  livestock.  This  reduces  concentrated  use  in  a 
specific  area  and  thus  improves  the  general  range  condition,  resulting 
better  habitat  for  both  the  livestock  and  wildlife.  The  key  elk  summer 
areas  are  not  given  special  consideration.  Animal  units  per  month  (AUM 
per  allotment  will  not  increase  a6  a result  of  this  timber  sale. 


Alternative  6 has  been  listed  as  the 
EIS.  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Sel 
Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  i6  the 
your  comments  back  to  us  in  30  days. 


* PREFERRED*  Alternative  in 
ected*  Alternative  but  will 
Final  EIS  for  your  review. 


the  Fin 
do  so 
Please 


Sincerely, 


JOHN  E.  BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


the 

in 

range 
' e) 

a 1 

in  the 
have 


Caring  lor  the  LBnd  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200  28H3  Q 


MOYER  SALT 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 33 


United  States  Department  of  the  Interior 

SALI..JN  II.  F. 

OFFICE  OF  THE  SECRETARY 

Office  of  Environmental  Affairs  _ , - • 

500  NE  Multnomah  Street,  Suite  fe'OO  J • ~ 

Portland,  Oregon  97232-203G 

Ini.,  6 At. it. t Q 


TAKf  — — » 

PRIDE  IN  SSS 
AMERICA  ww 


ER  92/620 

John  Burns,  Forest  Supervisor 
Salmon  National  Forest 
P.O.  Box  729 
Salmon,  Idaho  83467 


SUP . 

IMP  123455 

TAF  1 2 3AV9yB5 

CLM  1 2 3 4 5 6 

FRWW  123456 

AO  123456 

CC'S  10: 


18,  1992 

JL 


Dear  Hr.  Burnai 


Th«  Department  of  the  Interior  has  reviewed  the  Draft  Environmental  Impact 
Statement  (DEIS)  for  the  proposed  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale,  Cobalt  Ranger 
District,  Salmon  National  Forest,  Lemhi  County,  Idaho.  The  following  comments 
are  for  your  use  and  information  when  preparing  the  final  documents. 

GENERAL  COMMENTS 

On  January  29,  1991,  the  U.S.  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service  (Service)  provided  a 
species  list  (number  1-4-91-SP-204 ) for  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  which 
indicated  no  federally  listed  species  are  present  in  the  analysis  area. 
Provisions  under  section  7 of  the  Endangered  Species  Act  require  the  Salmon 
National  Forest  (Forest)  to  update  the  list  of  threatened,  endangered,  or 
proposed  species  after  180  days  if  the  project  has  not  commenced.  The  Service 
considers  the  project  to  be  initiated  when  the  timber  is  sold;  therefore,  the 
species  list  should  be  updated. 

In  addition  to  federally  listed  species,  the  Service  is  concerned  about 
potential  impacts  to  anadromous  and  resident  fish  and  their  habitat,  wildlife 
species  and  their  habitat,  State  and  federally  listed  sensitive  species,  and 
potential  cumulative  impacts  of  the  proposed  project  on  watershed  and 
ecological  resources. 

Methods  for  accessing  harvest  units  other  than  by  roads  was  not  clearly  or 
quantitatively  discussed  under  each  Alternative  in  the  DEIS.  The  Service 
recommends  that  the  final  documents  address  access  methods  that  do  not  require 
road  construction  in  the  existing  alternatives  or  additional  alternatives. 

SPECIFIC  COMMENTS 

Page  1 - 1 (Purpose)  The  DEIS  indicates  the  annual  allowable  Gale  quantity  is 
21  million  board-feet  of  timber.  The  level  of  annual  harvest  that  the  Forest 
can  sell  timber  and  meet  long-term  fish  and  wildlife  habitat  management  goals 
and  objectives  while  supporting  long-term  sustainable  yield  of  timber  for 
local  communities,  as  this  project  is  purported  to  do,  needs  to  be  disclosed. 


benefits  f 


ry-16  The  DEIS  states  that 
rora  this  proposed  action  may 


other  Incalculable 
enhance  the  econom 


and 

ic 


often  unforseen 
viability  of  the 


SALE 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


United  States 
Department  of 
Agriculture 


Forest 

Service 


Salmon 

National 

Forest 


P.O.  Box  729 
Salmon,  ID  83467 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date  : 


Charles  S.  Polityka 
Regional  Environmental  Officer 
500  NE  Multnomah  Street  Suite  600 
Portland,  OR  97232 


Dear  Mr.  Polityka: 

Thank  you  for  your  commente  of  Auguat  18,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber 
Sale.  Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis 
process  and  have  been  reviewed  and  diBcussed  by  our  team  of  resource 
specialists.  Their  ideas  are  the  basis  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and 
comprise  the  rest  of  this  letter. 

1 UPDATE  US  FISH  AND  WILDLIFE  SERVICE  SPECIE?  LIST 

The  species  list  for  this  analysis  area  was  updated  (by  telephone)  on 
March  31,  1993.  At  that  time  the  gray  wolf  was  placed  on  the  list  and  a 
Biological  Assessment  wa6  subsequently  completed  for  that  species. 

2 . HO  ROAD  ACCESS  FOR  TIMBER  HARVEST 

Due  to  comments  received  after  release  of  the  Draft  Environmental  Impact 
Statement  (EIS) , three  helicopter  alternatives  were  considered;  all,  however 
include  some  new  roads.  1^0  of  these  alternatives  were  dropped  from  further 
study  because  of  increased  costs  of  logging  and  transportation  with  minor 
benefits  to  wildlife. 

A third  helicopter  alternative  (Alternative  5)  was  considered  and  analyred  in 
detail.  Approximately  1.15  miles  of  new  road  construction  was  necessary  to 
facilitate  the  removal  of  timber.  Chapter  II  of  the  Final  Environmental 
Impact  Statement  discusses  this  alternative  and  Table  II-2  shows  a comparison 
of  the  effects  against  the  other  alternatives. 

3 ASP  vs.  FISH  AND  WILDLIFE  HABITAT  MANAGEMENT  QQA1,S 

The  Forest  Plan  sets  ASQ  and  timber  goals  by  meeting  Bet  standards  for  other 
resources.  The  result  is  21  MMBF  ASQ . Conclusions  reached  on  fish  and 
wildlife  habitat  management  goal  in  the  Draft  Environmental  Impact  Statement 


Caring  lor  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200-28b(3'92l 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 33 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


Page  Summary-16  The  DEIS  states  that  other  incalculable  and  often  unforeoen 
benefits  from  this  proposed  action  may  enhance  the  economic  viability  of  the 
project  and  that  other  Forest  resources  could  benefit  from  thiB  project. 
Specific  information  is  needed  on  short-  and  long-term  economic  impacts  to 
fiBh  and  wildlife  resources.  The  final  document  may  include  an  analysis  of: 

(1)  the  economic  effects  on  big  game  hunting  and  wildlife  observation,  (2)  the 
economLc  value  of  unroaded  foreBt,  economic  value  of  resident  and  anadromous 
fishes,  and  (3)  costs  of  mitigating  adverse  effects  on  fish  and  wildlife 
resources . 

Page  Summary-5  The  DEIS  states  that  the  index  for  measuring  potential  effects 
of  alternatives  on  fishery  resources  is  maintenance  of  anadromous  and  resident 
fiBh  habitat.  The  Service  believes  the  index  for  effects  on  fishery  resources 
should  be  how  the  proposed  action  would  help  the  Forest  meet  or  exceed  fishery 
habitat  management  objectives  for  the  analysis  area. 

Page  2-3  More  detail  is  needed  on  the  nature  of  the  “clumps'*  of  vegetation 
that  would  be  left  in  clearcut  areas  and  what  objectives  this  action  would 
fulfill.  Sufficient  information  for  addressing  final  documents  should  be 
given  in  Table  2-1  for  addressing  this  issue. 


Charles  S.  Polityka  2- 

(EIS)  are  based  on  available  information,  professional  experience  and  related 
research . 


4 . ECONOMIC  IMPACTS  TO  FISH  AND  WILDLIFE 

As  discussed  on  page  4-11  of  the  Moyer  Salt  Draft  EIS,  all  new  roads 
constructed  to  access  proposed  cutting  units  are  slated  for  year-round 
closure  except  during  po6t-6ale  open  access  firewood  gathering  periods 
Long-term  angler  access  to  the  mid  and  upper  reaches  of  Woodtick  Creek  would 
remain,  as  a result,  essentially  unchanged  from  present  conditions  As  an 
existing  road  parallels  mainstem  Moyer  Creek,  this  project  would  likewise 
have  no  effect  on  existing  angler  opportunities  or  harvest  levels  within  that 
drainage.  Consequently,  no  economic  impacts  to  fisheries  resources  would  h® 
expected  as  a result  of  implementation  of  any  of  the  proposed  Moyer  Salt 
timber  harvest  alternatives. 

All  proposed  alternatives,  with  their  appropriate  mitigation  measures,  meet 
Forest  Plan  Standards  and  Guidelines  for  wildlife  habitat  management  in  3A-5A 
and  3A-5B  Prescription  Areas.  Therefore,  these  alternatives  are  all  in 
concert  with  the  Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game's  big  game  population 
goals  for  this  GMU . Consequently,  there  are  no  predicted  economic  impacts  to 
the  wildlife  and  recreation  resources. 


Page  2-2  and  2-3  Justification  given  for  using  the  clearcut  method  of  harvest 
is  that  it  would  mimic  natural  tree  removal  events  (l.e.  fire),  and  allowing 
natural  revegetation  of  the  area,  but  the  following  paragraphs  discuss  in 
detail  potential  artificial  reseeding  efforts.  Including  scarification  of 
soils.  The  final  documents  should  include  criteria  that  would  be  used  to 
determine  if  reseeding  would  be  necessary,  how  scarification  of  soils  would 
mimic  natural  events,  and  why  scarification  and  reseeding  would  be  necessary 
or  desirable  alternatives,  even  if  natural  plant  succession  1b  slow  in 
occurring.  The  Department  also  suggests  that  if  reseeding  is  ultimately 
necessary,  a specified  mix  of  only  native  plant  species  would  be  used.  The 
species  to  be  planted  should  also  be  identified. 

Page  2-3  Since  areas  covered  with  sedges  would  be  scarified  and  sedges  may 
indicate  the  presence  of  wetlands,  the  Department  requests  that  the  final 
documents  provide  measures  that  would  be  undertaken  to  protect  wetlands. 

Table  2-1  The  section  of  the  table  listing  management  and  mitigation  measures 
for  soils  and  hydrology,  discusses  mitigating  impacts  from  cut  and  fill 
slopes,  roads  that  would  be  closed  and  presumably  obliterated,  constructed 
landing  sites,  and  scarified  strips  of  soils  in  harvest  areas.  The  final 
documents  should  address  how  the  above  mitigation  measures  would  be  applied  to 
each  alternative. 

Page  2-11  Alternative  3 is  described  as  the  alternative  designed  to  respond 
to  concerns  about  effects  of  the  proposed  project  on  wildlife  and  as  the 
alternative  developed  from  using  substantive  input  from  the  public.  The 
implication  is  that  other  alternatives  were  developed  with  less  public 
involvement  with  regard  to  fish  and  wildlife  impacts.  It  appears  from  the 
Service’s  review  of  Alternative  4 and  from  your  disclosure  that  this 
alternative  may  not  meet  Forest  management  objectives  for  resources  other  than 
timber  and  that  adequate  consideration  of  fiBh  and  wildlife  impacts  and 


5 . CLUMPS  IN  CLEAR CUTS 

In  your  letter  you  requested  more  detail  on  the  nature  of  the  clumps  of 
vegetation  that  would  be  left  in  the  clearcut  areas  and  what  objectives  this 
action  would  fulfill.  Generally  speaking,  leaving  some  existing  vegetation 
in  clearcut6  has  a variety  of  benefits.  When  considering  visual  impacts, 
leaving  6mall  clumps  of  uncut  trees  tends  to  breakup  the  stark  contrast  in 
the  landscape  created  by  the  new  clearcuts.  Also,  if  we  were  to  completely 
clearcut  the  entire  stand,  followed  by  piling  and  burning,  we  would  expect 
lodgepole  pine  to  be  the  predominant  regenerated  species.  Leaving  some  of 
the  advanced  subalpine  fir  and  Engelmann  6pruce  regeneration  will  help 
maintain  species  diversity.  Depending  on  the  size  of  the  "clump"  left  ether 
benefits  may  be  achieved  as  well.  Please  refer  to  Alternative  S of  the  FEIS 
for  a full  description  of  leaving  uncut  "islands"  within  the  clearcuts 

6 . SCARIFICATION  and  RESEEDING 

Historically,  many  of  our  lodgepole  stands  have  been  suddenly  destroyed  and 
subsequently  replaced  after  natural  catastrophic  events  such  as  wildfires 
Generally  these  fires  were  of  an  intensity  that  ground  vegetation  was 
removed,  thus  exposing  a mineral  seedbed  conducive  to  natural  seeding.  Most 
of  the  clearcuts  proposed  in  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale  occur  on  habitat 
types  where  grouse  whortleberry  is  the  predominant  ground  cover.  Past 
experience  of  logging  on  these  habitat  types  indicates  that  sufficient 
scarification  to  prepare  a mineral  seedbed  occurs  during  the  logging 
operation.  On  other  habitat  types  where  pinegrass,  elk  sedge,  or  sitka  alder 
i6  present  in  the  understory,  scarification  as  a separate  operation  is 
necessary  to  prepare  a mineral  seedbed.  For  the  proposed  action  alternatives 
this  would  be  necessary  on  approximately  50-100  acres.  The  National  Forest 
Management  Act  doe6  state  that  regulations  should  be  developed  specifying 
guidelines  which  insure  that  timber  will  be  harvested  only  where  "there  is 


C8rlng  lor  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


rs-6:oo  ;Sh< 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 33 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


attendant  public  comments  may  be  lacking  in  other  a 1 ternat 1 ves . The 
Department  suggests  that  the  eame  level  of  effort  in  evaluating  wildlife 
resource  impactB  should  be  provided  for  all  alternatives. 

0 £ggg—  i— 1 Ana  1 y a i a of  potential  cumulative  impacts  to  water  quality  and 

aquatic  habitat  should  include  not  only  the  percentage  of  each  drainage  to  be 
harvested , but  the  effects  of  the  previous  Salt  Creek  and  Tick  Creek  Timber 
Sales  which  occurred  within  the  analysis  area.  Cumulative  effects  analysis 
should  include  any  other  management  activities  which  have  occurred  or  may 
occur  within  or  adjacent  to  the  analysis  area,  including  grazing  activities. 

“|  Ppq9  3*6  Past  impacts  to  wetlands  from  road  crossings  are  discussed.  In 

general,  the  Department  supports  the  Forest’s  efforts  to  upgrade  road  crossing 
of  wetlands  and  to  avoid  all  impacts  to  wetlands  in  the  project  area. 

Pfiqg  The  Department  supports  the  proposed  removal  of  the  existing  culvert 

on  Woodtick  Creek  which  presently  acts  as  a fish  migration  barrier. 

) Pffqgg  2-21  and  2-22  The  discussion  of  planned  monitoring  activities  for  water 
quality,  fishery  resources,  and  wildlife  resources  needs  clarification.  The 
variables  to  be  monitored  should  be  specified,  and  the  sampling  frequency, 
length  of  the  sampling  period,  and  number  of  monitoring  sites  to  be  sampled 
should  be  listed. 

SUMMARY  COMMENTS 

3 Based  on  given  information,  the  Department  would  prefer  Alternative  3 because 
a larger  core  area  is  available  for  habitat  for  wildlife,  and  a lower 
percentage  of  the  drainage  is  to  be  harvested.  However,  comparison  of 
alternatives  is  difficult  without  having  cumulative  effects  of  all  previous 
actions  and  planned  future  actions,  addressed  adequately  and  monitoring 
efforts  clarified. 

We  appreciate  the  opportunity  to  comment. 


Sincerely, 


Regional  Environmental  Officer 


Charles  S.  Polityka 


assurance  that  such  lands  can  be  adequately  restocked  within  five  years  after 
harvest."  In  the  absence  of  scarification  on  habitat  types  where  pinegrass, 
elk  sedge,  or  alder  is  present,  regeneration  would  be  delayed  well  beyond  the 
five-year  regeneration  period  required  by  NFMA  when  clearcutting 


Similar  stands  that  have  been  clearcut  on  the  Cobalt  Ranger  District  have 
been  successfully  restocked  within  five  years.  Stocking  levels  may  be  as 
high  86  4,000  trees  per  acre  (See  DEIS  page  3-19)  . However  it  iB  standard 
practice  to  examine  and  monitor  cutting  units  after  harvest  to  ensure  desired 
regeneration  and  stocking  levels  are  achieved.  In  the  event  some  areas  do 
not  meet  acceptable  stocking  levels,  interplanting  (artificial  seeding)  may 
be  prescribed. 


7 .  PROTECTION  OF  WETLANDS 


Identified  wetlands  in  the  lower  areas  of  Units  25  and  S14  will  be  flagged  so 
that  surface  disturbance  within  these  areas  would  be  avoided. 


8 .  SOIL  AND  HYDROLOGY  MITIGATION  MEASURES 


All  mitigation  measures  as  well  as  standards  and  guidelines  are  applied  to 
all  alternatives  as  listed  in  Table  2-1  of  the  Draft  EIS  An  additional 
mitigation  has  been  added  to  the  Final  EIS  which  states  that  "brush  blade 
will  be  used  for  clearing  slash  off  roads  and  landings  during  operations  to 
keep  slash  piles  free  of  soil." 

All  mitigation  measures  listed  will  be  part  of  the  sale  package  for  the 
selected  alternative.  Chapter  4 of  the  DEIS,  on  page  4-1,  states  that 
effects  common  to  all  action  alternatives  would  be  mitigated  by  the  measures 
listed  in  Table  2-1  and  specific  effects  are  discussed  further  in  this 
chapter . 

9 .  EVALUATION  OF  ALL  ALTERNATIVES 

Wildlife  effects,  as  well  as  other  resources,  were  evaluated  at  the  same 
level  for  all  action  alternatives.  Please  see  Chapter  IV,  Environmental 
Consequences  for  full  disclosure  of  effects  of  timber  harvesting  and  read 
building  on  each  resource  Alternative  4,  as  stated  in  Chapter  2 of  the 
Draft  EIS,  was  developed  to  respond  to  concerns  about  economics  as  well  as 
effectiveness  in  treating  insect  and  disease  conditions  in  the  project  level 
Because  it  has  the  most  new  road  construction  and  highest  acreage  devoted  to 
timber  harvest  it  doe6  not  always  have  the  least  effect  on  other  resources 
However,  by  using  Best  Management  Practices,  it  shows  no  adverse  impacts  to 
many  of  the  other  resources  and  provides  a reasonable  range  of  alternatives 
to  accomplish  the  goals  and  objectives  of  the  Salmon  National  Forest's  Forest 
Plan . 


10 .  IMPACTS  TO  WATER  QUALITY 

In  the  Final  EIS,  Table  IV-2,  we  have  included  the  percent  of  drainages 
harvested  in  the  analysis  area  (see  page  IV-5)  and  discussed  the  effects  of 
the  previous  Salt  and  Tick  Creek  Sales  to  the  area.  In  addition,  the  POISED 
sediment  prediction  model  was  run  for  all  of  the  proposed  alternatives  and 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 33 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


Charles  S.  Polityka 


4 . 


the  results  are  shown  in  Table  1V-4  of  the  FEIS.  Future  activity  in  the  area 
is  discussed  in  the  cumulative  effects  section  on  page  1V-12. 

11 . MIGRATION  BARRIER  ON  WQQDT1CK  CREEK 

We  are  not  proposing  to  remove  but  to  realign  the  existing  culvert  on 
Woodtick.  Creek  that  is  a barrier  to  fish  migration  at  high  water  flows. 

1 2 . WATER  QUALITY 

The  project  files  contain  maps  of  the  wetlands  within  the  analysis  area. 

Since  there  was  not  any  significant,  difference  between  the  action 
alternatives  in  regards  to  wetland  impacts,  this  information  was  not 
displayed  in  the  DEIS. 

1 3 . ALTERNATIVE  3 FAVQRCD,  CUMULATIVE  EFFECTS  ANP  MONITOR! NO  EFFORTS 

Please  review  Alternative  3 in  the  FEIS.  Since  release  of  the  DEIS,  new 
findings,  through  sediment  modeling  results  done  in  1992,  show  that 
Alternative  3 would  not  maintain  anadromous  and  resident  fish  habitat  in  the 
Salt  Creek  drainage.  In  addition,  mainstem  Moyer  Creek,  below  the  mouth  of 
Salt  Creek,  would  be  at  high  risk  of  being  adversely  impacted.  We  have 
identified  and  developed  three  additional  alternatives  for  your  consideration 
in  the  FEIS. 

We  feel  we  have  done  an  adequate  job  of  evaluating  alternatives  for 
cumulative  effects.  As  far  as  monitoring.  6ince  the  DEIS  was  released, 
additional  water  quality  data  w#g  collected  and  a monitoring  program  proposed 
following  rood  construction  and  again  after  timber  harvest  in  the  Moyer  Salt 
analysis  area.  (See  FEIS,  Water  Quality  and  Fisheries  Monitoring  in  Chapter 
II)  . 

Alternative  6 has  been  listed  as  the  "PREFERRED*  Alternative  in  the  Final 
EIS.  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected"  Alternative  but  vill  do  so  in  the 
Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review.  Please  have 
your  comments  back  to  us  in  30  days. 

Sincerely, 


JOHN  E.  BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


Caring  lor  Ihe  Land  and  Serving  rpople 


I S #.:00-2HMV°2l 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  U 3A 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


y-y-7-L- 


FaRmEPS  INSURANCE  CROUP 
OF  COM“AUI[S 

SMCsrn;  t 


ji 


1 


>/M'  Jo/yi'j 

A’AT/^l 

r.t.  3t^  -y^j 

J/Umd/i'.  /p  S-5M7 

5/3;  /'/«  \)f,T)3c~  To  5r7)7r 

A L 33^7) 3 $ 3 nA  ftlfAT? 

tf  ,l.c  f Artery  3/ST.  B, 

A/YnKj  p AfP  7A  0T  7?/r 

7)Pi  ll^  J](i5  /V\eA, 


l«b  0 Ailwn  Q 

run 

IMP  1 2 3 « 5 G 
1,F  1 2 3 4 5 6 

.....  ......  'U-1  12  3 4 6 6 

lm«Y/  1 2 3 4 5 6 
>0 1 2 3 4 5 6 „ 

::::_  - ,,D— ^ 

THAT  / /4rl  //[)77?i^3  6/r 

Tif\3T  S<hr  / a J Taa/VjC  CCetx 

OJuSr  771/5  A'-taW/TF' 

■ HA/Aj/Vt  TP  IVtt 


4‘4j*ri>0<  nno-nc 
£<U  *I»M  fci 


77n^s 

lyA/T&£_. 

/*y-  /1'3'T^ 

L T'klPM  ,,0,6/H  O.BJT! 


United  States 
Department  of 
Age icul ture 


Forest 

Service 


Salmon  P.O.  Box  729 

national  Salmon.  ID  83467 

For  eat 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date  : 


Charles  Woods 
105  16th  Avenue 
Lewiston,  ID  83501 


Dear  Mr . Woods : 

Thank  you  for  your  comments  of  August  4,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber 
Sale.  Your  corrroente  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis 
process  and  have  been  reviewed  ajid  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource 
specialists.  Their  ideas  are  the  basis  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and 
comprise  the  rest  of  thi6  letter. 

HAUrTAJN  WILDLIFE  habitat 

All  proposed  action  alternatives  meet  the  Forest  Plan  Area  Prescription  for 
the  project  area  and  with  stated  mitigation  measures  will  result  in  port-sale 
habitat  conditions  that  are  compatible  with  the  Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and 
Game's  elk  population  goals  for  this  Game  Management  Unit.  Alternative  3 
will  have  the  least  Impact  of  the  conventional  alternatives  on  the  mapped 
KESR  but  would  have  the  greatest  impact  on  the  excellent  elk  habitat  in  Salt 
Creek.  The  overall  effects  of  this  alternative  are  thus  very  similar  to 
those  predicted  for  several  others  such  as  2A. 

Alternative  6 has  been  listed  as  the  "PREFERRED"  Alternative  in  the  Final 
E1S.  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected"  Alternative  but  will  do  so  in  the 
Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review.  Please  hove 
your  comments  back  to  us  in  30  days. 

Sincerely, 


JOK11  E.  BURUS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


Cnit  iq  (of  Ihe  Land  and  Serving  Teople 


fS  6200  2M-I3  «?i 


MOYER  SALT 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 35 


August  19,  1992 


James  B.  VanArk 
Box  1164 

Challis,  Idaho  83226 

John  Burns,  Supervisor 
Salmon  National  Forest 
Box  729 

Salmon,  Idaho  83467 
Bear  Mr.  Burns, 

Having  spent  a good  deal  of  time  hunting  elk  and  hiking  in  the 
area  of  your  proposed  Moyer  Salt  timber  sale.  1 feel  I need  to 
commen t . 

First  and  foremost,  this  area  is  probably  the  key  elk  calving  area 
in  this  entire  region.  It  appears  to  me  that  alternatives  2 and  4 
disregard  U.S.F.S.  directives  which  are  already  in  place  that 
mandate  key  wildlife  areas  should  be  maintained.  Alternative  3 

1 tends  to  at  least  consider  the  local  elk  population. 

Secondly,  study  after  study  has  shown  that  the  elk  population  is 
inversely  related  to  the  miles  of  roads  in  a certain  area. 
Although  the  miles  of  new  roads  are  roughly  equal  in  your 
proposals.  I feel  alternative  3 has  the  least  amount  of  impact  on 

2 this  critical  area.  In  addition,  the  Moyer  jeep  trail  (#6202) 
should  be  closed  in  section  15.  Finally,  these  new  roads  should 
again  be  closed  after  the  timber  harvest  and  equipped  with  cattle 

3 guards  and  fences  to  prevent  further  range  mismanagement. 

1 thank  you  for  your  consideration  and  hope  your  decisions  reflect 
concern  for  interests  other  than  the  local  lumber  mill.  Hopefully, 
at  least,  this  sale  will  make  a profit  considering  the  impact  it 
will  have  on  wildlife. 


S i ncere 1 y , 


SALE 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


United  States 
Department  of 
Agriculture 


Forest 

Service 


Salmon 

National 

Forest 


P.0.  Box  729 
Salmon,  ID  83467 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date : 


James  B.  VanArk 
P.O.  Box  1164 
Challis,  ID  83226 


Dear  Mr.  VanArk: 

Thank  you  for  your  comments  of  August  19,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber 
Sale.  Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis 
process  and  have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource 
specialists.  Their  ideas  are  the  basis  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and 
comprise  the  rest  of  this  letter. 

1.  MAINTAIN  WILDLIFE  HABITAT 

All  proposed  action  alternatives  meet  the  Forest  Plan  Area  Prescription  for 
the  project  area  and  with  stated  mitigation  measures  will  result  in  port-6ale 
habitat  conditions  that  are  compatible  with  the  Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and 
Game's  elk  population  goals  for  this  Game  Management  Unit.  Alternative  3 
will  have  the  least  impact  of  the  conventional  alternatives  on  the  mapped 
KESR  but  would  have  the  greatest  impact  on  the  excellent  elk  habitat  in  Salt 
Creek.  The  overall  effects  of  this  alternative  are  thus  very  similar  to 
those  predicted  for  several  others  such  as  2A. 

2 . CLOSURE  OF  THE  MOYER  PEAK  JEEP  TRAIL 

The  Moyer  Peak  Jeep  Trail  (#6202)  would  remain  open  for  historical  access, 
except  for  the  spur  road  just  west  of  Moyer  Peak  in  the  SE1/4NW1/4  of 
Section  16.  This  spur  road  will  be  closed  by  creating  an  earthen  barrier 
that  prevents  vehicle  access. 

3 . CLOSE  ALL  NEW  ROADS 

The  Cobalt  Ranger  District  will  gate  and  close  all  specified  roads  upon 
completion  of  road  construction.  The  Moyer  Salt  road  system  would  be 
included  in  the  Salmon  National  Forest  Travel  Plan  as  a yearlong  road 
closure.  The  roads  would  remain  closed  except  during  active  periods  of  the 
sale  or  when  needed  for  post  sale  activities,  administrative  purposes,  or 
periodic  firewood  gathering. 


Caring  for  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


FS-6200-28M3/92) 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 35 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


James  B.  VanArk 


4 . RESTRICTION  OF  LIVESTOCK  WITH  FENCES  AND  CATTLEGUARDS 


We  are  committed  to  install  cattleguards  on  new  roads  whenever  they  cross  an 
existing  fence.  There  are  presently  no  fences  in  the  Moyer  Salt  analysis 
area,  bo  we  have  not  planned  any  cattleguards  on  the  roads. 

When  the  ForeBt  Plan  was  developed,  grazing  allotments,  wildlife  boundaries, 
and  forage  production  capabilities  were  used  to  establish  livestock  grazing 
limits  at  levels  to  prevent  livestock/wildlif e conflicts.  By  increasing  the 
available  area  within  a given  allotment  with  the  same  number  of  cattle,  the 
result  i6  a dispersal  of  livestock.  This  reduces  concentrated  use  in  a 
specific  area  and  thus  improves  the  general  range  condition,  resulting  in 
better  habitat  for  both  the  livestock  and  wildlife.  The  key  elk  summer  range 
areas  are  not  given  special  consideration.  Animal  units  per  month  (AUM's) 
per  allotment  will  not  increase  as  a result  of  this  timber  6ale. 

Alternative  6 has  been  listed  as  the  "PREFERRED*  Alternative  in  the  Final 
EIS.  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected"  Alternative  but  will  do  so  in  the 
Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review.  Please  have 
your  comments  back  to  us  in  30  days. 

Sincerely, 


JOHN  E.  BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


Cailng  lor  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


I S-6200  2RM3'92» 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  It  36 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


United  States 
Department  of 
Agriculture 


Foi eat 
Service 


Salmon 
Hat ional 
Forest 


r.O.  Box  729 
Salmon.  ID  03*67 


August  23,  1992 


Salmon  ILitional  Forest 

Attn.  Lynn  Bennett 

D.E.I.S.  Response-  Moyer  Salt  Sale 

P.0.  Box  729 

Salmon,  Idaho  83967 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date : 


Guy  Roberts 
306  Adams  Street 
Salmon,  ID  63167 


Dear  Sir: 

I'm  In  favor  of  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber  Sale.  I support  alternative 
0 9 of  the  D.E.I.S.  Having  been  hit  by  tbe  bugs  and  the  drouth,  the 
timber  In  our  forest  Is  dying  at  an  alarming  rate  due  to  tbe  stress, 
60  harvest  It  before  it  Is  too  late.  Under  the  1I.E.F.A.  Act  1 know 
every  little  detail  has  been  worked  out. 

By  tbe  way,  the  D.E.I.S.  book  Is  one  well  put  together  book.  (I 
liked  It.)  Easy  to  find  what  1 was  looking  for. 


Guy  Roberts 


Salmon,  Idaho  83967 


sali.'.o:i  H f- 


Into  0 A'.hu  l □ 

CUP — 

IMP  1 2 3 9 5 6 

TAP  1 2 3 9 5 G 

ELM  1 2 3 4 5 G 

nilV/V/  12  3 4 5 6 
/ Q l 2 3 4 5 G 

CCs  1 0: ■* 


Dear  Mr.  Roberto t 

Thank  you  for  your  coomcntB  of  August  23,  1992,  on  the  Hoyer  Salt  Timber 
Sale.  Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis 
process  and  have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource 
special ists . 

Thanks  aloo  for  your  vote  of  confidence  In  our  management  of  the  ForeBt. 

Alternative  6 has  been  listed  as  the  ■ PREFERRED*  Alternative  in  the  Final 
Environmental  Impact  Statement  (EIS).  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected" 
Alternative  but  will  do  so  in  the  Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the  Final 
EIS  for  your  review.  Please  have  your  conrnents  back  to  us  in  30  days. 

Sincerely. 


JOHN  E.  BURHS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


Caring  (or  Ihf  land  and  Serving  Pfopb 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 37 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


IDAHO 

COHSERVATIOM 

LEAGUE 

PO  Bo*  26M.  Knlc»wmi.  W1  833-10 
Wood  Wax  Chopld  |208|  726  8437 

f^,llc  ,r992,,“=*  1:081  726  7485 


Jolin  Hums,  Supervisor 
Salmon  National  Forest 
I’.O.  Box  729 
Salmon.  ID  81467 


Dear  John: 

please  accept  these  comments  on  the  Moyer  Salt  I imher  Sale 
DEIS.  I would  like  to  thank  you  for  providing  a readable  and 
understandable  document.  I he  maps  provided  are  legible,  give 
valuable  information,  and  make  the  alternatives  mote 
understandable. 

I  he  DEIS  and  the  alternatives  for  the  sale  directly  address  one  of  the 

points  we  have  discussed  with  you  in  our  appeal  of  the  Salmon  NF 

1 forest  plan  - the  removal  of  key  elk  summer  range  (KESR)  from  the 

timber  base  ICE  continues  to  support  strongly  the  protection  of  this 
habitat  We  are  willing  to  support  Alternative  3 which  would 

exempt  a block  of  KESR  from  timber  harvest  and  allow  logging  on  the 

least  sensitive  lands  in  the  analysis  area  there  is  a great  deal  of 
Forest  Service  direction  and  research  to  support  Alternative  3 

2 l he  Salmon  Forest  Plan  states  on  page  111  1 that  "habitat  for  big 
game  species  will  be  managed  to  provide  for  increases  over  current 
populations,"  and  that  "selected  areas  of  key  elk  summer  range  ...  will 
be  managed  to  enhance  habitat  potential.  Recent  elk/logging 
studies  show  that  elk  have  more  complex  habitat  needs  than  can  be 
expressed  by  a simple  cover. forage  ratio  Security  and  road  density 
are  missing  components  in  that  equation  Elk  consistently  select  a 
conformation  of  habitats  that  provides  access  to  the  larger, 
continuous  forest  communities  in  the  environment.  ..Although  hiding 
cover  and  security  are  often  interpreted  as  equivalents,  they  do  not 
represent  interchangeable  components  of  elk  habitat.  Hiding  cover 

3 may  contribute  to  security  at  any  lime,  but  it  dues  not  necessarily 

provide  security  during  the  hunting  season  ( Habitat  Selections  by 
Rocky  Mountain  Elk  Under  Hunting  Season  Stress."  Lyon.  C anfield, 
lnlermounlain  Research  Station,  Missoula).  Also,  It  has  been 


United  States 


Agriculture 


Forest 

Service 


Salmon 
Nat iona 1 
Foreot 


P O.  Box  729 
Salmon,  ID  03467 


Reply  to:  1950 


Date  : 


Linn  Klncannon 
Public  Lands  Associate 
Idaho  Conservation  League 
P.O.  Box  2671 
Ketchum,  ID  03340 


Dear  Ho.  Kincannon: 

Thank  you  for  your  comments  of  August  10,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber 
Sale.  Your  comments  are  on  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis 
process  and  hove  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource 
specialists.  Their  ideas  ore  the  basis  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and 
comprise  the  rest  of  this  letter. 

1 . REMOVAL  OF  KESR  FROM  THE  TIMBER  BASS 

During  the  Forest  planning  process,  all  areas  of  key  elk  summer  range  on  this 
Forest  were  mapped.  A portion  of  these  areas  were  then  selected  to  receive 
a 4 B Management  Area  Prescription  which  places  management  emphasis  first  and 
foremost  on  elk  habitat  objectives.  The  amount  of  acres  given  the  4B 
prescription  was  sufficiently  large  to  provide  necessary  core  areas  for  elk 
which,  in  combination  with  surrounding  areas,  would  support  target  population 
established  in  the  Idaho  Department  of  Fish  and  Game  Species  Management  Plan 
for  elk. 

In  the  upper  portion  of  this  project  area  (i.e.  Wildlife  Analysis  Area  ID, 
timber  harvest  activity  can  actually  increase  elk  habitat  potential  by 
creating  a more  favorable  ratio  of  cover  to  forage  areas.  Proposed 
Alternative  3 would  protect  an  area  of  mapped  but  undesignated  IFLRMP)  4B 
area  at  the  expense  of  a more  severe  impact  on  some  excellent  elk  sujrmer 
range  in  the  lower  portion  of  Salt  Creek  where  cover  is  limiting. 

2 . INCONSISTENCY  WITH  FOREST  SERVICE  POLICY  REGARDING  CUTTING  TIMBER 
3N-EE5B 

The  document,  “Elk  habitat  Relationships  for  Central  Idaho",  contains  good 
information  concerning  management  of  elk  habitat.  Portions  of  this  document 
were  adopted  in  the  ForeBt  Plan.  These  management  standards  and  guidelines 


Caring  lot  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


MOYER  SALT 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 37 


repeatedly  documented.  . .that  vehicle  traffic  on  forest  roads  evokes 
an  avoidance  response  by  elk  . . .Declines  in  elk  use  have  been 
delected  as  far  as  2 miles  from  open  roads,  but  significant  reductions 
in  habitat  effectiveness  are  usually  confined  to  an  area  within  a half 
mile.  The  loss  of  habitat  effectiveness  has  been  shown  to 
be. . greatest  where  cover  is  poor  and  least  where  cover  is  good,  and 
greater  during  the  hunting  season  than  at  any  other  lime  of  the  year. 
As  a general  average,  habitat  effectiveness  can  be  expected  to 
decline  by  one-fourth  when  open  road  densities  are  1 mile  per 
section  and  by  one-half  when  road  densities  are  2 miles  per  section" 
("Coordinating  Elk  and  Timber  Management,  Montana  Dept  of  Fish, 
Wildlife,  and  Parks.  1985). 

In  the  description  of  the  effects  of  Alternative  2 on  Area  11,  the  DEIS 
stales  that.  "Total  road  density  would  increase  to  approximately  2.5 
mile/square  mile  Consequently,  the  high  value  this  area  has  a big 
game  security/hiding  cover  would  be  greatly  decreased,  even  with 
the  roads  closed."  Likewise,  Alternative  A would  place  harvest  units 
"in  an  area  that  currently  provides  very  good  security  cover  for  big 

game (and)  this  alternative  would  definitely  be  less  favorable  to  the 

wildlife  resources,  particularly  the  hunted  big  game  species,  than  any 
of  the  other  action  alternatives."  Conversely,  the  DEIS  states  that 
with  Alternative  3 "an  unroaded  area  of  excellent  security/hiding 
cover  would  be  retained  between  Area  1 and  Area  11." 

The  publication  "Elk  Habitat  Relationships  for  Central  Idaho,"  which 
was  written  by  wildlife  biologists  and  approved  by  3 forest 
supervisors,  slates  that  "timber  harvest  on  key  elk  habitats  should 
be  limited  to  those  activities  that  will  maintain  or  enhance  the 
habitat  for  that  particular  elk  use." 

4 Page  IV-88  of  the  forest  plan  states  that  "Unroaded  key  elk  summer 
ranges  and  big  game  winter  ranges  will  continue  to  support  the 
majority  of  the  population  of  hunted  species."  In  light  of  this 
direction  and  because  the  Salmon  Forest  is  planning  to  enter  so  many 
roadless  areas  for  timber  harvest  in  the  next  5 years,  now  is  the  time 
to  begin  to  protect  these  unroaded  KESR's  from  timber  harvest  and 
road  intrusions. 

The  DEIS  states  that  all  specified  roads  would  be  gated  and  closed 

g after  construction,  except  during  active  period  of  the  sale  or  when 
needed  for  post  sale  activities,  administrative  purposes,  or  periodic 
firewood  gathering  These  activities,  particularly  firewood  cutting, 


SALE 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


Linn  Kincannon  2 . 

help  accomplish  specific  goals  in  areas  that  received  "Key  Elk"  (4A  or  4B) 
management  prescriptions  in  the  Forest  Plan. 

Our  particular  timber  sale,  however,  contains  cutting  units  within  areas  that 
received  3A  anadromous  fish  habitat  prescriptions  and  5A,  5B  and  5C  timber 
management  prescriptions  in  the  Forest  Plan,  rather  than  the  "Key  Elk" 
prescriptions.  Any  selected  action  alternative,  however,  would  meet  Forest 
Plan  Wildlife  Standards  and  Guidelines  for  wildlife  prescriptions. 

3 .  WILDLIFE  SECURITY 

You  are  correct  in  stating  that  hiding  "does  not"  necessarily  provide 
security  during  hunting  season."  There  i6  a difference  between  habitat 
security  and  elk  vulnerability,  as  discussed  on  pages  IV-35  and  36  of  the 
Draft  Environmental  Impact  Statement  (EIS) . Vulnerability  or  hunting  season 
security  or  lack  of  security,  is  definitely  affected  by  ease  of  human 
access.  For  this  reason,  all  proposed  action  alternatives  that  would 
construct  roads  through  the  mapped  KESR  portion  of  this  analysis  area  contain 
mitigation  measures  to  gate  and  close  the  entire  road  system  to  all  but 
administrative  use.  In  addition,  the  portions  of  road  through  the  KESR  will 
also  have  slash  piled  on  the  road  Burface  to  effectively  discourage  or 
eliminate  human  traffic  by  foot  or  horse.  This  will  negate  or  greatly 
decrease  any  predicted  decrease  in  any  aspect  of  elk  habitat  that  is 
attributed  to  roads. 

4 . ROAD  INTRUSIONS 

Pristine  unroaded,  unmanaged  areas  are  attractive  to  many  people  for  a 
variety  of  reasons  the  most  commonly  stated  of  which  is  aesthetics.  However, 
we  are  unaware  of  any  species  of  flora  or  fauna  native  to  the  Salmon  National 
Forest  that  requires  totally  unroaded  and  unaltered  habitats  to  survive  in 
viable  numbers.  Many  if  not  all  mid  to  early  serai  species  like  deer  and  elk 
actually  benefit  from  the  vegetation  aspect  of  timber  management.  Our  old 
growth  retention  stand  commitment  and  snag  guideline  (FLRMP)  coupled  with  the 
thousands  of  acres  of  land  on  this  Forest  that  are  unsuitable  for  timber 
management  more  than  adequately  provide  habitat  for  viable  population  of 
other  Bpecies  such  as  pileated  woodpeckers  that  prefer  or  require  late  serai 
forests.  Road  access  does  affect  some  species,  especially  game  animals. 
However,  virtually  all  new  roads  constructed  on  this  Forest  are  closed  to  all 
but  administrative  uses  by  direction  of  the  current  Forest  Plan. 

5 . MAINTAIN  WILDLIFE  HABITAT 

For  all  alternatives,  the  entire  road  system  constructed  for  this  sale  will 
be  gated  and  administratively  closed  to  motorired  traffic.  In  addition,  the 
road  through  the  KESR  will  have  Blash  piled  on  it  to  discourage  and/or 
eliminate  human  travel  by  foot  or  horse.  This  will  negate  or  greatly 
decrease  any  predicted  effects  due  to  roading. 


Coring  lor  the  Innd  end  Serving  People 


f.?oo.28b(3/Q2l 


(O  f'- 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 37 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


will  constitute  a significant  use  of  the  roads  in  the  KESR,  with  all  the 
consequential  effects  on  the  elk.  In  addition,  road  closures  are  hard 
to  enforce  when  so  many  folks  own  ATY’s  or  trailbikes  which  can 
easily  go  around  gates  and  gain  access  to  the  road  beyond.  The 
cumulative  effects  of  future  harvests  in  the  area  will  force  much,  if 
not  all,  of  the  wildlife  to  abandon  the  area.  When  added  to  the 
effects  of  other  planned  entries  into  roadless  areas,  elk  populations 
(and  those  of  other  wildlife)  will  decrease  - in  direct  opposition  to 
forest  plan  direction.  If  logging  must  be  done  in  this  area,  continued 
protection  of  the  KESR  as  provided  in  Alternative  3 becomes  more 
important.  ICL  requests  that  this  KESR  be  removed  from  the  timber 
base. 

The  DEIS  states  that  biological  corridors  will  be  maintained.  Please 
include  a map  of  these  corridors  in  the  FEIS.  Also  please  map  the  old 
growth  retention  stands  in  the  FEIS. 

Mitigation  measures  are  planned  which  will  protect  anadromous  fish 
habitat  for  threatened  and  endangered  salmon.  Also,  road  surfaces 
will  be  revegetated.  Monitoring  is  planned  for  the  life  of  the  project 
and  for  several  years  afterward  to  document  any  changes  in  stream 
sedimentations  and  impacts  on  fish  spawning  habitat  in  Woodtick 
Creek.  Where  will  funding  come  from  for  these  and  other  monitoring 
and  mitigation  plans?  Mitigation  and  monitoring  should  be  part  of 
the  Decision  notice  and  logging  contingent  on  mitigation,  to  insure 
that  it  gets  done. 

9 Data  is  to  be  collected  to  document  existing  conditions  in  Woodtick 
Creek,  beginning  in  1992.  Has  such  data  been  collected?  The 
information  collected  should  appear  in  the  FEIS,  otherwise  we  will 
not  know  that  the  monitoring  has  been  done. 

10  The  DEIS  mentions  that  exclusion  of  fire  is  the  reason  for  the 

existence  of  large  areas  of  mature  conifer  stands  of  one  successional 
stage.  Fire  is  necessary  to  the  preservation  of  biodiversity.  The 
analysis  of  forest  health  in  the  Blue  Mountains  of  Oregon  has  shown 
that  fire  suppression  and  timber  harvest  methods  are  the  major 
causes  of  the  disastrous  conditions  there.  You  are  proposing  to 
harvest  limber  to  improve  diversity  and  diminish  bug  problems. 


Linn  Kincannon 


6 . MAPPING  BIOLOGICAL  CORRIDORS 


Landscape  boundaries  for  the  Moyer  Salt  analysis  area  were  delineated  and  a 
map  of  those  boundaries  is  found  in  Chapter  III,  Figure  III-2.  Biological 
corridors  are  discussed  further  in  Appendix  H under  the  discussion  of 
landscape  boundaries. 


7 . OLD  GROWTH  RETENTION  MAP 

We  have  included  a map  of  the  old  growth  retention  stands  (Figure  III-3)  in 
the  Final  EIS. 


0 . FUNDING  FOR  MITIGATION  MEASURES 

The  mitigation  measures  detailed  in  Chapter  2 are  incorporated  into  the 
timber  sale  design  and  layout,  and  into  the  timber  sale  contract  provisions. 
Specific  clauses  will  be  included  in  the  sale  contract  to  implement  the 
mitigation  measures.  The  contracting  officer  is  responsible  for  ensuring 
that  the  logging  contractor  carries  out  the  mitigation  specified  in  the 
contract . 


9 . WATER  MONITORING 

The  details  for  Water  Quality  and  Fisheries  monitoring  are  disclosed  in  the 
FEIS,  Chapter  II  under  Project  Monitoring.  Water  quality  data  was  collected 
on  Moyer  Creek  and  Woodtick  Creek  during  1992.  This  data  is  discussed  in  the 
FEIS,  Chapter  III  under  Hydrology  and  Fisheries. 

10 . PRESCRIBED  FIRE  ALTERNATIVE  AND  THE  ROLE  OF  FIRE  IN  BIODIVERSITY 

A prescribed  bum  alternative  to  address  forest  health  concerns  was 
considered  after  we  reviewed  your  request.  It  was  dropped  from  further 
consideration,  however,  because  it  does  not  contribute,  in  part  to  the  Forest 
Plan  objective  of  satisfying  the  commercial  demand  for  timber. 

In  the  Draft  EIS,  Chapter  III,  we  discussed  fire  history  and  pa6t  timber 
harvest  activity  under  the  Timber  Resource  section.  We  stated  that  both 
even-aged  and  uneven  aged  stands  occur  in  a mosaic  pattern  of  mature  forest, 
younger  forest,  openings,  and  edges  due  in  part  to  fire.  Because  fire  has 
been  excluded  from  this  area,  only  one  or  two  age  classes  exist.  Timber 
harvesting  can  be  used  to  change  the  vegetative  distribution  and  abundance 
ratio. 

In  the  Final  EIS,  Chapter  IV  of  the  Biological  Diversity  section,  we  have 
made  our  best  attempt  at  discussing  the  biological  diversity  of  this  area  and 
predict  the  effects  from  timber  harvest.  Please  review  your  copy  of  the 
Final  EIS  and  if  you  Btill  have  questions  concerning  biological  diversity, 
let  us  know  within  30  days. 

Alternative  6 has  been  listed  as  the  "PREPERRED"  Alternative  in  the  Final 
EIS.  We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected"  Alternative  but  will  do  so  in  the 


Coring  for  the  Lnnd  and  Serving  People 


F 5 -6200 -28  b 13 '9 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 37 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


These  methods  have  failed  in  the  past  and  are  not  likely  to  be 
successful  now.  The  FEIS  should  document  where  fire  suppression 
and  timber  harvest  have  been  effective  in  protecting  biodiversity. 

The  FEIS  should  also  include  a prescribed  burn  alternative  to  address 
forest  health  concerns.  ' 

Thank  you  for  this  opportunity  to  provide  input. 


Sincerely, 


Linn  Kincannon 
Public  Lands  Associate 


1 


I 

I 


Linn  Kincannon 


Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review 
your  comments  back  to  us  in  30  days. 


Please  have 


Sincerely, 


JOHN  E.  BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


e 


Caring  for  the  Land  Bnd  Serving  People 


rS-fi200-2Rbn'92> 


MOYER  SALT 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 38 


EcCi.ll,  Tcleh? 
leyt . 1S32 


Mr.  Jchn  Burns,  Supervisor 
Ss  irr.on  ilstional  Forest 
F.O.  3ox  729 
Salmon,  Idaho  83467 

Dear  Fir.  Burns; 

In  September.  I,  a native  Idaho  individual  in  her  mid  80's, 
is  sending  another  tax  payment  to  the  IP.3.  It  is  infuriating 
that  I should  have  to  help  destroy  our  land  and  its  natural 
resources  in  order  to  subsidize  corp' orate  timber  profits,  as 
the  Foyer  Salt  timber  sale  may  do. 

Unless  adequate  wildlife  habitat  is  withdrawn  from  timber  har- 
vest consideration,  as  programmed  in  Alternate  #3  in  your  DEIS, 
Idaho  and  the  liation  will  lose  a most  critical  asset. 


Idaho  is  serving  as  a safety  valve  for  over-populated  areas 
under  pressure  for. space.  The  Forest  Service  can  serve  as 
a guide  to  regulate  that  expansion  by  nurturing  all  life,  or 
it  can  yield  to  corporate  pressure  and  hasten  the  destruction 
of  wild  and  human  habitat. 


Cf  course  we  need  to  maintain  the  local  economy.  If  the  Forest 
Service  will  instigate  programs  to  restore  habitat  and  land 
forms,  the  damaging  of  which  it  has  condoned,  there  will  soon 
be  an  increase  in  available  jobs. 


Some  economic  advisors  point  to  "clean-up  stocks"  as  a major 
investment  opportunity.  Let  us  all  think  rehabilitation  and 
clean-up. 


salmom  n.f. 


V.  el Te  To  bias 

14061  Farm  to  Market  Rd. 

McCall,  Idaho  63638 


SEP  1 1 '92 


Info  O 


AcOonQ 


SALE 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


United  States  Forest 

Department  of  Service 

Agriculture 


Salmon  P.O.  Box  729 

National  Salmon,  ID  03467 

Forest 


Reply  to:  1950 

Date : 


Nelle  Tobias 

14061  Farm  to  Market  Road 
McCall,  ID  83638 


Dear  Ms.  Tobias: 

Thank  you  for  your  comments  of  September  8,  1992,  on  the  Moyer  Salt  Timber 
Sale.  Your  comments  are  an  important  part  of  the  environmental  analysis 
process  and  have  been  reviewed  and  discussed  by  our  team  of  resource 
specialists.  Their  ideas  are  the  basis  for  our  response  to  your  concerns  and 
comprise  the  rest  of  this  letter. 

1.  REMOVAL  OF  ADEQUATE  WILDLIFE  HABITAT  FROM  TIMBER  HARVEST 

Pristine  unroaded,  unmanaged  areas  are  attractive  to  many  people  for  a 
variety  of  reasons  the  most  commonly  stated  of  which  is  aesthetics.  However, 
we  are  unaware  of  any  species  of  flora  or  fauna  native  to  the  Salmon  National 
Forest  that  requires  totally  unroaded  and  unaltered  habitats  to  survive  in 
viable  numbers.  Many  if  not  all  mid  to  early  serai  species  like  deer  and  elk 
actually  benefit  from  the  vegetation  aspect  of  timber  management.  Our  old 
growth  retention  stand  commitment  and  snag  guideline  (FLRMP)  coupled  with  the 
thousands  of  acres  of  land  on  this  Forest  that  are  unsuitable  for  timber 
management  more  than  adequately  provide  habitat  for  viable  population  of 
other  species  such  as  pileated  woodpeckers  that  prefer  or  require  late  serai 
forests.  Road  access  does  affect  some  species,  especially  game  animals. 
However,  virtually  all  new  roads  constructed  on  this  Forest  are  closed  to  all 
but  administrative  uses  by  direction  of  the  current  Forest  Plan. 

2 . MAINTAIN  COMMUNITY  STABILITY  ALONG  WITH  WILDLIFE  HABITAT 

We  agree  with  you  that  maintaining  the  local  economy  is  important.  In  fact, 
providing  a continuous  flow  of  raw  materials  to  manufacturing  communities  is 
one  of  the  reasons  we  harvest  timber. 

We  alBo  are  concerned  with  maintaining  wildlife  habitat.  In  the  Moyer  Salt 
analysis  we  have  included  a list  of  nine  specific  wildlife  mitigation 
measures,  six  of  which  deal  with  minimizing  the  predicted  effects  of  this 
project  on  elk  habitat.  These  measures  range  from  protection  of  natural 


Coring  lor  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


rS-6200-28b(3/92l 


MOYER  SALT  TIMBER  SALE 


Public  Comment  Letter  # 38 


Salmon  National  Forest  Response 


Nelle  Tobias 


2 . 


ecotones  to  placing  slash  on  a portion  of  the  closed  road  system  to  decrease 
the  ease  of  human  access. 

In  addition  the  snag  retention  and  replacement  guidelines  and  old  growth 
retention  areas,  both  of  which  are  contained  in  our  current  Forest  Plan 
direction,  will  help  maintain  habitat  for  at  least  minimum  viable  population 
of  small  game  and  nongame  birds  and  mammals. 

Alternative  6 ha6  been  listed  as  the  "PREFERRED*  Alternative  in  the  Final 
EIS . We  have  not  yet  chosen  the  "Selected"  Alternative  but  will  do  so  in  the 
Record  of  Decision.  Enclosed  is  the  Final  EIS  for  your  review.  Please  have 
your  comments  back  to  us  in  30  days. 

Sincerely, 


JOHN  E . BURNS 
Forest  Supervisor 

Enclosure 


Caring  lor  the  Land  and  Serving  People 


F5-6200-28b(3'9 


c) 


. 


. 


nflffii^.SSS'W-TURAI.  LIBRARY