Skip to main content

Full text of "On the color and color-patterns of moths and butterflies"

See other formats


FRAGILE § 


DOES NOT 


CIRCULATE 


7605 Aq] Ent OL Sb2- 


Cornell Mniversity Library 


THE GIFT OF 


/ 


=| 
| 
§ 
, | 
| 
ost poo 
4 
24 e o 


DATE DUE 


RETURN TO 
ENTOMOLOGY LIB 


RARY 


Cornell University 
Ithaca, N. Y. 


ies o> pag ae sa gems nme Dea ee a 2 rw ea ee oe mage 


% 
£ 
1 


SaaS ae 
‘ . S 
ie : G » “5 
Core, 2 q A 
rice <= pan S pare 
ae FS = - me . 
| a o FS ie ees 
ries 5 | wn Fw 
Ak 3 = “f S Co rn 
= z be = a 
os c yz Zz = & 
gat = hoe 2 e a (hase 
aS She = BO. oR 
ia = & ne 
i=] = a & 
Peay : 3 26 
a4 , 3 Fe y 2 E 
Be H : 
nec i hs og 
On ete: 
ag eee 


Vou. XXX. No. 4. 


_ ON THE COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS OF MOTHS 
ee AND BUTTERFLIES. 


. 


By Atrrep GoLtpsporoucH Mayer. 


Wirn Ten PLATES. 


CAMBRIDGE, MASS., U.S. A.: 
PRINTED FOR THE MUSEUM. 


Fresrvary, 1897. 


—————— 


No. 4.—On the Color and Color-Patterns of Moths and Butter- 
lies) 


By Atrrep Gotpsnoroucn Mayer. 


This research is an investigation of the general phenomena of Color 
in Lepidoptera, and also a special account of the Color-Patterns of 
the Danaoid and Acraeoid Heliconidae, and of the Papilios of 
Tropical South America, and has been carried out under the direction 
of my friend and instructor, Dr. Charles B. Davenport; and the work 
was done in connection with one of the courses given by him in 
Harvard University in 1894-952 I am indebted to Dr. Davenport 
not only for suggesting the subject, but also for his kindness in deyot- 
ing much time to a criticism of the results. 

The paper is divided into three parts. Part A contains an ac- 
count of the general phenomena of color in Lepidoptera; Part B 
is devoted to a special discussion of the color-variations in the Heli- 
conidae, with special reference to the phenomena of mimicry; and 
Part C consists of a summary of those results which are believed to 
be new to science. <A Table of Contents is given at the end of the 
paper. 


PART A. 


GENERAL PHENOMENA OF COLOR IN LEPIDOPTERA, 
I. CLASSIFICATION OF CoLoRs. 


We follow Poulton (’90)in dividing Lepidopterous colors into (1) 
pigmental and (2) structural, 

(1) Pigmental Colors are due to the presence of an actual pig- 
ment within the scales, and although such colors are very common 
in the Lepidoptera, it is frequently very difficult to say off-hand 
whether a given color is due to a pigment or to some structural effect. 
Coste (9091) and Urech (93) have, however, given criteria for de- 
termining whether acolor is due to a pigment or to some other cause. 
They succeeded, for example, in dissolving out the color in many 


1Contributions from the Zoblogical Laboratory of the Museum of Comparative Zoul- 
ogy at Harvard College, E, L. Mark, Director, No. LXXIV. 


“This paper was written in 1895 essentially as it now stands. 


170 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


cases, leaving the wing white or colorless. Coste used as solvents 
a number of strong acids and alkalis; while Urech confined him- 
self to the use of water, hydrochloric acid, and nitric acid. Their 
results may be conveniently summarized as follows :— 

Black according to Urech is a pigmental color, for it may be dis- 
solved out of the wings by means of hydrochloric or nitric acid. 

Brown is usually insoluble in water, but is soluble in hydrochloric 
or nitric acid. 

The red and orange pigments of the Pieridae, Lycaenidae, 
Nymphalidae, Zygaenidae, and some Papilios are soluble in water. 
They are insoluble in water in the Sphingidae, Arctidae, Bombycidae, 
Saturnidae, and Geometridae. 

Yellow pigment is acted upon by reagents in almost the same way 
as the red and orange, especially if both red and yellow appear upon 
the same wing. It is soluble in the Pieridae, Lycaenidae, Nym- 
phalidae, Satyridae, and some Papilios, but insoluble in the Sphin- 
gidae, Arctidae, Geometridae, and a few Noctuidae. 

White is usually a structural color, but can be dissolyed out 
from the wings of the Pieridae by water, being in this case, of 
course, due to a pigment. 

Green pigment can be dissolved out by water in the cases of the 
Pieridae, Lycaenidae, and Geometridae. In the vast majority of 
cases, however, it is a structural color. 

Violet and blue are almost always due to structural causes. In a 
few cases, however, as in Smerinthus ocellatus, a blue pigment can 
be dissolved out. © 

We see, then, that black, brown, red, orange, and yellow are 
usually due to pigment, while white, green, violet, and blue are gen- 
erally due to structural effects. 

It is well known that the scales of Lepidoptera are essentially 
hollow, flattened sacs often inclosing pigment, and Burmeister (’78) 
arrives at the conclusion, from a study of the scales in various spe- 
cies of Castnia, that the pigment is for the most part attached to the 
upper layer of the scale-sac, rendering it opaque, while the lower 
layer receives less pigment and is, in consequence, a little more 
translucent. . 

(2) Structural Colors owe their origin to the external structure of 
the scales or wing-membranes and not to the presence of a pigment. 
They are often caused by diffraction, due to the scales being covered 
with fine, parallel striae. Some of the most splendid colors in .the 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 171 


animal kingdom are due to this cause; such are the iridescent and 
opalescent hues of many of the Morphos and Indo- Asiatic Papilios. 
Very often the scales which display such brilliant colors contain no 
pigment whatsoever; for if one will merely soak them in alcohol, 
ether, or water, all color disappears, and the scales become as trans- 
parent as glass. This test was devised by Dimmock (’83), who 
used it upon the brilliantly colored scales of many beetles. It 
was first discovered by Burgess (80), and has since been con- 
firmed by Kellogg (794), that the striae which produce these structural 
colors are all upon the outer surface of the scale, 7. ¢., the surface 
which is away from the wing-membrane and exposed to the light. 
Kellogg (94) has determined the distance apart of the striae upon 
the scales of many species of Lepidoptera. It appears, for example, 
that the striae upon the scales of Danais plexippus are 2y apart, 
those upon the transparent scales of Morpho sp. 1.52, upon the 
pigment-bearing scales of Morpho 0.724, and upon Callidryas 
eubule 0.9% apart. It is very evident, then, that the brilliant color- 
ation of the scales may be due to this fine striation, for the striae 
upon Rowland’s or Rutherfurd’s finest gratings are approximately 
1.54 apart, which is about the average distance between the ridges 
of the scales. 

Structural colors are, however, not always due to diffraction; in 
the case of white, for example, the color is almost invariably due to a 
reflection of all, or nearly all, the light that impinges upon the scales. 
As long ago as 1855 Leydig pointed out that the silvery white color 
seen in the scales of some spiders, such as Salticus and Tegenaria, 
was due to air contained within them; and more recently Dimmock 
(83) has shown that silvery white and milk-white colorations are 
due to optical effects produced by reflected light. In the silvery white 
scales, however, such as those of the under surface of the hind wings 
of Argynnis, there must be a polished reflecting surface toward 
the observer, for both silvery and milk-white colors appear simply 
milk-white by reflected light. 

(3) Combination Colors owe their richness and brilliancy to a 
combination of structural and pigmental effects. The geranium-red 
spots upon the hind wings of the Mexican Papilio zeunis Lucas owe 
their red color to pigment, but over this red there plays, in certain 
lights, a beautiful pearly iridescence, which, in combination with the 
red, greatly enhances its charm, Urech (92) has demonstrated that 
in the Vanessas there are scales which have chemical coloring matter 


172 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


and interference colors also. In addition, he points out the interest- 
ing case of certain Lycaenidae where the scales exhibit to the eye 
only interference effects, and yet a pigment can be dissolved out of 
them by the use of water. 

(4) Quantitative Determination of Pigmental Colors. I have 
analyzed the colors of many butterflies by means of the spectroscope, 
and also by Maxwell’s dises. As is well known, Maxwell’s dises are 
colored circular dises of cardboard, perforated at the center and slit 
along a radius so that two or more of them may be slid over each 
other, thus exposing different proportions of each. Then by rapidly 
rotating them the colors become blended, and thus it becomes 
possible to match any color, and to discover its fundamental con- 
stituents. By this means I have determined that the vast majority 
of the colors found in Lepidoptera are impure; that is to say, they 
contain a large percentage of black. 

For example the white of the upper surface of the wings of the 
common Pieris rapae consists of: 17% black, 13% emerald-green, 
10% lemon-yellow, and 60% white. 

Also the so-called “blacks” found in butterflies are rarely jet-black, 
but, almost always, only deep shades of brown. For instance the 
deep brown color of the under surface of the wings of Heliconius 
melpomene consists of 93% black, 3% lemon-yellow, 3.5% of 
Maxwell’s fundamental red (vermilion), and 0.5% of von Bezold’s 
fundamental blue-violet. 

The purest color I have met with is the canary-yellow ground 
color of the wings of Papilio turnus, which seems to consist of 
white light with the addition of a little yellow. 

Other colors all possess considerable black. Thus the glaucous 
green of Colaenis dido consists of black 29%, vermilion 24%, 
emerald-green 87%, von Bezold’s blue-violet 10%. 

The sepia-brown ground color of Cereyonis alope consists of black 
71%, vermilion 21.5%, emerald-green 7.5%. 

The tawny rufous color of the wings of Mechanitis polymnia, ete., 
is made up of black 46%, vermilion 40%, lemon-yellow 14%. 

The rufous red patch on the upper surface of the fore wings of 
Heliconius melpomene is made up of black 27%, vermilion 66.5%, 
lemon-yellow 6.5%. 

The yellow of the fore wings of Mechanitis polymnia consists of 
lemon-yellow 67%, emerald-green 14%, and white 19%, 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 173 


(5) Spectrum Analysis of Colors of Lepidoptera. 1 haye made 
some spectrum analyses of the light reflected from the wings 
of various butterflies, by means of a piece of apparatus most kindly 
suggested for the purpose by Prof. Ogden N. Rood of Columbia 
College. The arrangement is shown in Figs. 1, 2, Plate 1; Fig. 1 
being a perspective view, and Fig. 2 a horizontal section of the 
apparatus, which consists of a rectangular box, blackened upon the 
inside, and having a well-fitting cover. A rectangular slit (0) was 
cut through one of the long sides of the box, near one end, and the 
other end of the same side was perforated in order to allow the 
admission of the direct-vision spectroscope (S). Imagine that we 
wish to examine the yellow spots from a butterfly’s wing. All of 
the yellow spots from the wing are cut out, and pasted upon two 
pieces of cardboard so as to make two large unbroken patches of 
color. The pieces of cardboard are then blackened upon all those 
places where the colored wing was not pasted. One of the card- 
boards is then suitably mounted upon the back of the box at B; the 
other is placed upon a vertical support (IF), the plane of which is 
parallel to the back of the box. 

The working of the apparatus is as follows: the sunlight enters 
by the slit (O) and is reflected and diffused three or four times 
between the pieces of colored wing mounted upon the back (B) of 
the box, and the vertical support (I*). The manner of this reflec- 
tion and diffusion is shown by the dotted lines of Fig. 2. After 
undergoing several reflections, the light enters the direct-vision 
spectroscope (5). The slit of the spectroscope is wide open, and 
thus the light which enters it may readily be examined. It was 
found that it was necessary that the light be reflected more than 
once from the wing before it enters the spectroscope, for the first 
reflection shows so much white light that it is usually quite impossi- 
ble to analyze the true color of the wing, the predominant colors 
being obscured by a continuous spectrum. In general it was found 
that the colors of the wings are not simple, but compound ; that is 
to say, they are made up of a mixture of several different colors. 

For example, the spectrum of the rufous ground color of the 
upper surface of the wings of Danais plexippus consists of all of the 
red and yellow of the spectrum and about 75% of the green, 

The red spots upon the upper side of the fore wings of Heliconius 
melpomene also consist of the red and yellow and a very faint, 
hardly visible, trace of green. 


174 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


The glaucous green patches on the wings of Colaenis dido are 
composed mainly of green and yellow, but there is also a faint develop- 
ment of about half of the blue and a still fainter trace of red. 

The iridescent blue-green ground color of the upper surface of the 
wings of Morpho menelaus, viewed in such a way that the light 
makes an angle of about 20° with the normal to the surface of the 
wing, gives a spectrum of green and blue about equally developed. 

The yellow ground color found on the upper side of the wings of 
Papilio turnus shows a continuous spectrum, in which the yellow 
seems to be rather more brilliant than in the normal spectrum of 
white light. 

The sepia-brown ground color of the upper surface of the wings 
of Cereyonis alope gives a spectrum which lacks only the blue-green 
and blue. 

(6) Summary of Results. The researches of Coste (90-91) and 
Urech (93) have demonstrated that the colors of butterflies and 
moths may be produced by two causes : by the presence of an actual 
pigment, or by some structural effect. Some colors are due entirely 
to pigment, others to structural causes, and still others to a combina- 
tion of the two. 

Black, brown, red, orange, and yellow are invariably due to 
pigment. 

Green is usually due to a structural effect, but in a few cases there 
is a green pigment present. 

White, blue, and violet are almost invariably due to structural 
causes. 

In addition to these facts I have found that most of the colors 
which are displayed by Lepidoptera contain a surprisingly large 
percentage of black. Also they are usually not simple colors, but 
composed of a mixture of several different colors. It is remarkable 
that Natural Selection, which is generally assumed to have been one 
of the principal factors in bringing about the wonderful develop- 
ment of colors in Lepidoptera, has not been potent enough to make 
these colors purer than is the case in existing butterflies. 


IJ. Tue essentraL Nature or Pigmentrat Conor IN 
LepImpopTEera. 


(1) Pigments of Larvae. Poulton (85) showed that the phy- 
tophagous larvae of Lepidoptera “ owe their colour and markings to 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. i 


two causes: (1) Pigments derived from their food-plants, chloro- 
phyll and xanthophyll, and probably others; (2) pigments proper 
to the larvae, or larval tissues made use of because of some (merely 
incidental) aid which they lend to the colouring, e. g. fat.” Poulton 
concludes that all green coloration is due to chlorophyll, and 
that nearly all yellows are due to xanthophyll. All other colors, 
including black and white and some yellows, are due to pigments 
proper to the larvae themselves, 

Later, in 1893, Poulton proved that the larvae of Tryphaena 
pronuba could transform both etiolin and chlorophyll into a larval 
coloring matter, which may be either green or brown. It thus 
appears that some brown pigments are derived from food, and are 
merely modified plant pigments. Green larvae have green blood, 
and this color is due to chlorophyll in solution. It is remarkable 
that this chlorophyll solution is stable under the prolonged action of 
light, and in this respect is different from any other known solution 
of chlorophyll. It is worthy of note, further, that the spectrum 
of this green blood shows a great resemblance to that of chlorophyll. 
“Tn fact the two spectra are far nearer to one another than the 
ordinary spectrum of chlorophyll in alcoholic solution, is to the 
unaltered chlorophyll of leaves.” 

(2) Pigments of Imagines. In 1891, Urech showed that the 
similarity between the color of the urine of butterflies and the 
principal color of their scales is so close that it cannot be considered 
as accidental, but rather must be regarded as physiological. Urech 
compares in a table the color of the urine and that of the scales 
of 29 species of Lepidoptera. In all but two species the resem- 
blance is very close.! 

Urech further shows that the color of the ure (and the corres- 
ponding color of the scales) is not dependent upon the kind of food, 
for one and the same food plant may be differently digested in 
different groups of Lepidoptera. Thus he compares the behavior ofa 
Vanessa with that of one of the Microlepidoptera (leaf-rollers). Both 
of these feed upon the nettle (Urtica). In the larva of the Vanessa the 
contents of the stomach are intensely green, but become red in the 
pupa. In the ease of the leaf-roller the contents of the stomach are 
never markedly green and become insipid in color during the pupal 
stage. 


1 Likewise, Hopkins (94) has shown that in the Pieridae the urine is tinged by a yellow 
substance haying exactly the color of the wings. 


176 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


Poulton has shown that the reddish fluid yoided by the Vanessas 
immediately after emergence from the chrysalis contains uric acid, 
and Hopkins ('9+) says that when the yellow Pieridae emerge, they 
often void from the rectum a large quantity of uric acid. It should 
be borne in mind however, as Urech himself suggests, that the pig- 
ment found within the wings may not be identical in chemical com- 
position with the similarly colored fluid from the alimentary tract, 

Hopkins (’89, 91, °94, 796) has discovered that the white pigment 
found in the seales of Pieridae is uric acid, and that the red and 
yellow pigments of the Pieridae are due to derivatives of uric 
acid. THe also says, “these uric acid derivatives used in ornamen- 
tation, are apparently confined to the Pieridae alone among butter- 
flies.” Hence when a Pierid mimics an insect of another family, the 
pigments in the two cases are chemically quite distinct. This is well 
seen in the genera Leptalis (Pieridae) and Mechanitis (Danaidae). 

In addition to this, Griffiths (92) finds that the green pigment 
found in Papilio, Parthenos, Hesperia, Limenitis, Larentia, Ino, and 
Tlalias is a derivative of uric acid, to which he gives the name of 
“Lepidopteric acid” and assigns the empyrical formula C,, H,, Az, 
NEO: 

In a paper published in 1896 in the Bulletin of the Museum of 
Comparative Zodlogy at Harvard College, Vol. 29, I have shown, 
p- 226-230, that the pigments of the scales of Lepidoptera are 
derived by various chemical processes from the blood, or haemo- 
lymph, of the pupa, and that the haemolymph is a proteid substance 
containing ege-albumen, globulin, fibrin, xanthophyll, orthophos- 
phoric acid, iron, potassium, and sodium. 


Ill. DeveLopmMEeNT oF THE VARIOUS CoLors IN THE PUPAL 


WINGS. 


A few researches have been carried out upon this interesting 
topic, but as the literature is scattered and has never been brought 
together, it will perhaps not be amiss to present a brief résumé of 
the principal facts which have been already ascertained. 

(1) JZistorical Account of previous Researches. In 1889 
Schiffer (’89) discussed the question of the order and time of 
appearance of the colors in the pupal wings of several of the 
Vanessas. Unfortunately he apparently did not make his obser- 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 177 


vations at sufficiently close intervals of time, and was, therefore, 
led into some misstatements, which have been corrected by van 
Bemmelen (789) and Urech (’91). 

Van Bemmelen carried out an elaborate research upon the 
development of the various spots and colors upon the wings of 
Pyrameis cardui, Vanessa urticae, V. io, Pieris brassicae, and a few 
other forms. He discusses in detail the time and manner of appear- 
ance of all of the different spots upon the wing. Into these details 
we shall not follow him, but shall merely present his general con- 
clusions regarding the development of the various colors. In Pieris 
brassicae it appears that during the first days of the pupal stage the 
wings are colorless and transparent ; after a few days, however, the 
fore wings become opaque, and white; later the hind wing, also, 
goes through the same changes. The wings then remain unaltered 
until about two days before the butterfly issues. Then, very sud- 
denly, the black spots and the yellow ground tone of the under 
sides appear. White is thus the primary color; black and yellow 
secondary, The first color to make its appearance in the case of 
Pyrameis cardui is a brown-yellow ground color, which may be 
observed in pupae four days old. The hind wings are at this time 
somewhat darker than the fore wings. The color then changes from 
darker brown to cinnamon-brown. The black spots appear later upon 
this delicate reddish brown ground color, The three fused spots 
which form the whitish band in the middle of the front edge of the 
fore wing appear during the last days of development, just before 
the completion of the final color-pattern. 

Both van Bemmelen and Urech have shown that in Vanessa 
urticae the order of appearance of the various colors is the same as 
in Pyrameis cardui, The first color to appear in Vanessa urticae is 
a faint reddish tinge ; this deepens and forms the ground color, and 
later the black spots appear upon it, 

Urech (91) has made a careful study of the development of the 
colors upon the pupal wings of Vanessaio. The wings are at first 
wholly white. Then in a restricted area of this white is noticed the 
appearance of a yellow, which forms the yellow of the mature wings. 
Almost contemporaneous with the development of the yellow comes 
the red, which appears in another part of the primitively white field, 
and gradually deepens in color until it forms the brownish red 
ground color of the adult wings. Still later another portion of the 
primitive white changes into the black of the mature wing. The 


178 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


under side of the mature wings of Vanessa io is mainly uniform 
black, and in this case also this color develops from the white at a 
very rapid rate, near the end of the pupal stage. This development 
of the black directly upon the white areas is quite remarkable in 
Vanessa io, and very different from that of both Vanessa urticae 
and Pyrameis cardui, where the black spots develop upon a field 
already tinged with red. Urech points out the fact, that some of 
the white spots seen in the mature wings of the Vanessas represent 
the “ primitive white ” of the pupal wings. 

Finally, the latest paper upon the subject of the development 
of color in the pupa is that of Haase (93), who has examined 
the pupae of a number of Papilios (e. g., philenor, machaon, 
asterias, turnus, and podalirius), and finds that during early pupal 
life the wings are as transparent as glass; after a time, however, 
they change to an impure white, which soon becomes yellowish, and 
then the various colors which are destined to adorn the mature 
wings begin to appear. 

If we are to learn much of fundamental import concerning the 
phylogeny of color in Lepidoptera, the researches should be carried 
out upon the lower moths, and not upon such highly specialized 
forms of Rhopalocera as the Vanessae. 

In my paper on Wing scales, ete. (Mayer, ’96, p. 232), I have 
come to the conclusion that dull ocher-yellow and drabs are, 
phylogenetically speaking, the oldest pigmental colors in the Lepi- 
doptera. The more brilliant colors, such as bright yellows, reds, 
and pigmental greens, are derived by complex chemical processes, 
and are, phylogenetically speaking, of recent appearance. 


I have made a study of the development of the colors and pattern 
in the wings of Callosamia promethea Linn. and of Danais plexip- 
pus Fab, 


(2) Development of Color in the Pupal Wings of Callosamia 
promethea. The cocoons of Callosamia promethea are very abundant 
during the winter months, when they may be found hanging to the 
stems of the food plants of the larvae. The pupal wings remain 
perfectly transparent all through the winter, until about ten days 
before the time when the moth is destined to issue ; they then become 
opaque white. An examination of the wings at this period shows 
that the scales are perfectly formed (Fig. 25, Plate 3), except for the 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 179 


lack of pigment, which is developed later. If one treats the scales at 
this stage with oil of cedar-wood or clove oil, they become practically 
invisible under the microscope, thus demonstrating that there is 
no pigment within them. Fig, 26, Plate 3, gives the appearance 
presented by a scale taken from the light drab-colored margin of 
the mature wing. This is about the lightest area upon the wing, 
except the white spots; but it will be seen that this scale is much 
darker in appearance than the unpigmented one shown in Fig. 25. 
The white or unpigmented condition of the wing lasts for about 
four days. The wings then become uniformly tinged with an 
impure yellow or light drab, and very soon after this the colors 
begin to make their appearance. They first appear upon the lower 
surface of the wings. Fig. 28, Plate 3, represents the under 
surface of the fore wing of a female in a very early stage of color 
development; in fact the upper surface shows, as yet, no trace of 
the colors. It will be seen that a few dark red streaks have 
appeared near the central portion of the wing, and it is worthy of 
note that these occupy the interspaces between the nervures. The 
ocellus near the apex of the wing appears faintly outlined upon its 
background of impure yellow. 

Fig, 27, Plate 3, represents the under side of a hind wing of 
a male in about the same stage as Fig. 28. Here, again, the red color 
occupies the interspaces, and indeed it is only later that the nervures 
become clouded over by it. 

Figs. 29 and 30, Plate 3, represent, respectively, the under and 
upper sides of the fore wing of a male about five hours after the 
first appearance of the colors. Upon the upper side (Fig. 30) we 
see two gray streaks near the base of the wing and a light cinnamon- 
brown color extending from the lower edge toward the middle of 
the wing. The ocellus near the apex is now quite apparent, but 
still faint in color, On the under surface (Fig. 29) the red markings 
have developed to a much greater extent than in Fig. 28. The 
outermost of the two white spots which occupy the center of this red 
area becomes the white central spot of the mature wing; the inner- 
most one is soon obliterated owing to its becoming clouded over 
with red, : 

Figs. 37 and 86 represent respectively the upper surface of 
the fore wing and the lower surface of the hind wing of a female, 
slightly more advanced than in Fig, 30. Fig. 31 represents a male 
and Fig. 88 a female about twelve hours after the first appearance 


180 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


of the color. It is remarkable that in this stage the male and female 
wings are quite similar in general appearance, except that the ground 
color of the male is now a dusky gray, while that of the female is a 
cinnamon-brown. 

From this time onward, however, the wings of the two sexes begin 
to differ more and more in appearance, for the ground color of the 
male becomes deep black, while that of the female remains cinnamon- 
brown. This change is well exhibited. by Figs. 832 and 39, Plate 3, 
which give the appearance of the upper surfaces of the male and 
female wings respectively at about twenty hours after the first appear- 
ance of the colors. Fig. 33 represents the hind wing of the same male 
whose fore wing is shown in Fig. 32, Figs. 34, 35, 40, and 41 give 
the appearance of the pupal wings just before emergence, when 
the colors are completely formed. 

To summarize; Figs, 27, 29, 33, and 35 give successive stages in 
the development of color in the male; and Figs. 28, 36-41 give 
similar stages for the female. It becomes evident, from a comparison 
of these successive developmental stages, that the colors appear first 
upon the central portions of the wings, and that the outer and costal 
edges of the wings and the nervures are the last parts to acquire 
the mature coloration. 

It is worthy of remark that the color-pattern of the mature male 
Callosamia promethea is quite a departure from the type of coloration 
which is commonly found among the Saturnidae. The female, 
however, conforms very well to the general pattern of the other 
species of the family. It is quite evident that the deep black colora- 
tion of the male is, phylogenetically speaking, a new acquisition, and 
that the coloration of the female represents the less differentiated 
and therefore, more primitive type. 

It is interesting in connection with these facts to observe that the 
color-patterns of both male and female develop in almost identical 
ways up to the twelfth hour after the first appearance of the color ; 
that then, however, the grayish ground color of the male wings 
begins to deepen into the characteristic jet black of the adult, while 
the light cinnamon ground color of the female merely becomes 
slightly darker as the wings mature. 

(3) Development of Color in the Pupal Wings of Danais 
plexippus. Figs, 42-45, Plate 3, are intended to illustrate four 
stages in the development of color in the pupal fore wings of Danais 
plexippus. The pupal stage of this species is of brief duration, last- 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 181 


ing from one to two weeks only, according to the temperature to 
which the chrysalis is exposed. For the first few days the wings are 
perfectly transparent, but about five days before the butterfly issues 
they become pure white. An examination of the scales at this 
period shows that they are completely formed and merely lack 
pigment. In about 48 hours after this (see Fig. 42) the ground 
color of the wings changes to a dirty yellow. It is interesting to 
note that the white spots which adorn the mature wings remain 
pure white. Fig. 43 illustrates the next stage, where the black has 
begun to appear in the region beyond the cell. The nervures them- 
selves, however, remain white. Fig. 44 shows a still later condi- 
tion, where the dirty yellow ground color has deepened into rufous, 
and the black has deepened and increased in area and has also 
begun to appear along the edges of the nervures. In Fig. 45 the 
black has finally suffused the nervures, the base of the wing and 
the submedian nervure being the only parts that still remain dull 
yellow. It is apparent that in Danais plexippus, as in Callosamia 
promethea, the central areas of the wings are the first to exhibit the 
mature colors, and that the nervures and costal edges of the wings 
are the last to be suffused, 


IV. Tue Laws wuich GOVERN THE CoLor-PaTrTEeRNS oF BuTrrer- 
FLIES AND Morus. 


(1) Historical Account of previous Researches. The earliest 
paper upon this subject is by Higgins (68). He came to the 
conclusion, that “the simplest type of color presents itself in the 
plain uniform tint exhibited when the scales are all exactly alike.” 
He also thought it probable that “the scales growing on the mem- 
brane upon or near the veins would be distinguished from the 
scales growing on other parts of the membrane by a freer develop- 
ment of pigmentary matter, and that in this manner would arise 
a kind of primary or fundamental color-pattern, namely, a pale 
ground with darker linear markings following the course of the veins, 
e. g. Pieris crataegi.” He also attempted to explain the formation of 
eye-spots by assuming that crescent-shaped markings migrate out- 
wards from the sides of the neryures and meet so as to inclose a 
space. 


182. BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


It is, however, untrue that there is a freer development of pig- 
ment within the scales lying upon the nervures; in fact, the reverse 
is the case, as we have seen, in both Danais plexippus and Callo- 
samia promethea. THiggins’s explanation of the formation of eye- 
spots is also fallacious. 

Darwin (71, Vol. 2, p. 133) published four excellent figures from 
a drawing by Trimen, illustrating two simple ways in which eye- 
spots are actually formed, both diametrically opposed to Higgins’s 
hypothesis. Darwin says that in the South African butterfly, Cyllo 
leda, “in some specimens, large spaces on the upper surface of the 
wings are coloured black, and include irregular white marks, and 
from this state a complete gradation can be traced into a tolerably 
perfect ocellus, and this results from the contraction of the irregular 
blotches of colour, In another series of specimens a gradation can 
be followed from excessively minute white dots, surrounded by a 
searcely visible black line, into perfectly symmetrical and large 
ocelli” with several rings. 

Scudder (’88—89) and, afterwards, Bateson (94) have shown 
that the ordinary eye-spots, such as those found in Morpho and the 
Satyridae, are invariably placed in the interspaces between the longi- 
tudinal veins of the wings, and also that they are often found repeated 
upon homologous places of both pairs of wings. Bateson says that 
ocelli are often seen upon both surfaces of the wing, the centers of 
the upper and lower ocelli coinciding. In the majority of cases, 
however, the upper and lower ocelli, although coincident, have quite 
different colors. The simpler sort of ocelli, such as those seen in the 
Satyridae or in Morpho, have their centers on the line of the fold- 
marks or creases of the wing. It sometimes happens that these 
creases seem to begin from the center of an ocellus. As these 
creases commonly run midway between two nervures, it usually re- 
sults that the center of the eye-spot is exactly half way between two 
nervures. The large eye-spots of Parnassius apollo are an exception 
to thisrule. In some Morphos, Satyridae, etc., in cell I of the hind 
wing there are often two creases and two eye-spots, one for each 
crease; but if there be only one eye-spot present, its center does not 
correspond with the middle of the cell, “but is exactly upon the 
anterior of the two creases.” I have observed the same law for the 
white marginal spots in cell I° in Ceratinia vallonia, C. fimbria, and 
Mechanitis polymnia. 

In 1889 Seudder, in his work upon the Butterflies of New 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 183 


England, called attention to the following facts: the transverse 
series of dark spots so often seen in the body of the wings of 
Lepidoptera are invariably placed in the interspaces between the 
longitudinal veins, never upon the veins themselves, excepting 
only in rare instances, where the spots occur at the extreme margin, 
He also pointed out that in many types of moths all differentiation 
in coloring has been greatly retarded, so far as the hind wings are 
concerned, by their almost universal concealment by day beneath 
the overlapping front wings. In these cases “ the simplest departure 
from uniformity consists of a deepening of the tint next the outer 
margin of the wing.” It is but a step from this condition to a 
band of dark color or a row of spots parallel with the margin. This 
explains why the transverse style of markings, for the hind wings 
at least, is so common. Scudder showed that “the number of 
instances, in butterflies, in which similar markings appear in the 
same areas of the two wings, and in the same relative position 
in these areas, is far too common to be a mere coincidence. It is 
most readily traced in the disposition of the ocelli, which are very 
apt to be similar in size and perfection, and to be situated between 
the same branches of homologous veins.” 

(2) Laws of Color-Patterns. As a result of my own study of 
the wings of moths and butterflies, 1 am prepared to propose the 
following additional laws of color-patterns. (@) Any spot found 
upon the wings of a moth or butterfly tends to be bilaterally symmet- 
rical both as regards form and color, the axis of symmetry being 
a line passing through the center of the interspace in which the 
spot is found, and parallel to the direction of the longitudinal 
nervyures. For example, in Figs. 6 and 7, Plate 2, each spot is 
bilaterally symmetrical about the axis HH. The same law holds 
for the spots represented in Figs. 8-14 and 16. 

(6) Spots tend to appear not in one interspace only, but as a row 
occupying homologous places in successive interspaces. Indeed we 
almost always find similar spots arranged in linear series, each sim- 
ilar in shape and color to the others and occupying the center of its 
interspace. The rows of spots represented in Figs. 8-14 and 16 
will suffice to illustrate this law. 

It is interesting to notice that bands of color are often made by 
the fusion of a row of adjacent spots; and, conversely, chains of 
spots are often formed by the breaking up of bands, leaving 
a row of spots occupying the interspaces, Many instances of this 


184 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


are to be seen in certain specimens of various species of the 
Heliconidae. For example, in Heliconius eucrate (Fig. 58, Plate 
4) I have observed that certain specimens show a row of distinct 
spots in place of the, usually entire, band which crosses the middle 
of the hind wing. In fact, the vast majority of bands can be 
analyzed into a series of similar elements, each element occupying an 
interspace. Thus, in Plate 2, Fig. 17, which represents a wing of 
Saturnia spini, the band seen crossing the wing parallel with its 
margin is made up of a series of fused crescents, each crescent 
occupying an interspace. 

If, on the other hand, this band were to break away from the 
nervures, the result would be a series of crescent-shaped spots each 
occupying the center of an interspace. It is very interesting to 
observe the manner in which bands degenerate and disappear. 
Numerous opportunities for doing this may be had among the Heli- 
conidae. In some species, as in Melinaea parallelis, hardly any two 
specimens are alike in the condition of the black band across the 
middle of the hind wings. Zhe most common method of disappear- 
ance is a shrinking away of the band at one end. This is wellillus- 
trated in Figs. 84-87, Plate 7, which represent a sort of ‘* Mercator’s 
Projection ” of the wings of Mechanitis isthmia (for explanation of the 
plan of projection see page 207.) Fig, 84 represents a male, showing 
a well-marked band of hardly separated spots extending across the 
middle of the hind wing. Fig. 87 shows a female in which the 
spots are thinner and more crescentic and the separations much 
more marked. Fig. 85 is also drawn from a female, in which it will 
be seen that the band has shrunk away leaving only a portion of it 
at the right, and in Fig, 86, which represents another female speci- 
men, only one faint spot is left. 

It is very common to find bands shrinking away at one end. 
Sometimes, however, they shrink away at both ends, and very often 
they break up into a row of spots, which may then contract into the 
centers of their interspaces and finally disappear. It is worthy of 
note that it is vey rare to find a band breaking at the middle of its 
length and each half receding from the other. Such a case is, how- 
ever, shown by Melinaea parallelis (see Fig. 82, Plate 7), where one 
sometimes finds specimens in which the black band across the middle 
of the hind wings is complete and unbroken; whereas in other 
specimens, as in Fig. 82, it is partially broken in the middle, and in 
still others the break has become a wide gap by the drawing away of 
the halves of the band from each other. 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 185 


We see, then, that it is very common to find bands shrinking 
away from either end, but very rare to find them broken in the 
middle region. ‘This, however, is only a special case of the law 
enunciated by Bateson (794), that the ends of alinera series are more 
variable than the middle. Almost any row of spots also exhibits 
the same law, in that the spots occupying the middle portions of 
the row are similar one to another, while those at the ends of the 
series depart more or less from the type. (See Figs. 10-13, 
Plate 2.) 

The position of spots which are situated near the edge of the 
wing is largely controlled by the wing-folds or creases. In Meli- 
naea egina (Fig. 96, Plate 8) there is a row of white spots near the 
outer edges of the wings, and each of these spots is cut in two by a 
narrow black line which extends along the wing-fold. Also in Cera- 
tinia yallonia (Fig, 81, Plate 7) and in many other forms of the 
Danaoid Ifeliconidae one often finds two creases in a cell, and in 
this case there are two marginal spots, one on each crease. In 
many other cases, however, the marginal spots are double in each 
cell, although there is but a single wing-fold; the spots in these 
cases are situated at some distance on either side of the fold. (See 
Higs. 95, 96, Plate 8.) Another very common condition is exem- 
plified in Fig. 83, Plate 7, where there is a single marginal spot 
situated upon the wing-fold in each cell. 

(3) Detailed Discussion of the Laws of Color-Patterns. Figs. 
6-14 and 16, Plate 2, are taken from special cases which serve 
to illustrate the two chief laws of color-pattern, 7. ¢., that spots tend 
to be bilaterally symmetrical about an axis (HH, Figs. 6, 7) passing 
through the center of the cell parallel with the nervures; and 
also, that spots of similar shape and color tend to be repeated in 
a row of adjacent cells. 

In Fig. 7 the spots are separated in the middle, but still incline 
outward symmetrically from the center; indeed, instances of double 
spots are very common. In such cases, however, each half spot is < 
reflection of its mate on the other side of the axis passing through 
the center of the cell. 

Kio. 8 represents various eye-spots found in the Morphos, and 
will serve to illustrate the laws of eye-spots which have been enunci- 
ated by Scudder (’89) and Bateson (94). These spots occupy the 
center of the cells in which they are found. In cell II, for example, 
is a large eye-spot with a crescent in its center, and it will be 


186 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


observed that this crescent follows the general law and is bilaterally 
symmetrical about the usual axis.! 

Fig. 9 shows the law of repetition of some very complex spots, each 
being bilaterally symmetrical. It is found in Parthenos gambrisius. 

Figs. 10 and 11 represent Ornithoptera urvilliana and O. priamus 
respectively. In Fig. 10 we see an instance of a spot within a spot, 
and in Fig. 11 an even more complex case, for here there are three 
systems of spots one within another. 

Fig. 12 represents the marginal markings found in Hestia jasonia 
and Fig. 13 Hestia leuconoe var. clara, These two examples are 
intended to illustrate the fact, that, although the markings are 
situated wpon the nervures, they are bilaterally symmetrical not 
about the nervures as axes, but about the usual axis passing midway 
between the nervures. In Fig, 12 it will be seen that the two 
curved markings situated upon neryures 1” and 2, and projecting 
into cell I*, are bilaterally symmetrical only in reference to the axis 
through the middle of the cell. 

In allied species the spot situated upon nervure 1” is often absent. 
The system of markings is therefore undergoing degeneration at this 
end (ef. Fig. 13, cell It). The curved mark upon nervure 5 (Fig. 
12) projecting into cell V is plainly symmetrical with respect. to its 
fellow in the opposite side of cell V, and not with its near companion 
which projects into cell TLV. The same is also true in the case of the 
spots in cell VI. 

In Fig. 13 the spots appear at the first glance to be bilaterally 
symmetrical about both nervures and centers of cells, but in cell LV 
the marking situated on nervure 4 does not quite reach to the cen- 
ter, and it is interesting to observe that its fellow on nervure 5 also 
falls short of reaching the center and is therefore symmetrical with 
respect to the other curved spot in cell TV. This case also furnishes 
an instance of a break in the middle of a linear series. 

Fig. 14 is taken from the under surface of the hind wing of 
Papilio emalthion. It serves to illustrate the fusion of two orig- 
inally separate rows of spots. In this case the crescent-shaped spots 
above have fused with the rectangular ones below, so as to inclose 
a portion of the ground color of the wing. Sometimes two rows of 


1A very beautiful exception (Pig. 19, Plate 2) to this rule for the crescents found in eye- 
spots is seen in the under surface of the fore wing of Missanga patinia Moore. It will be 
noticed that the large black crescent found in this beautiful eye-spot is 90° away from its 
usual position, This is the only exception of the sort known to me. 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 187 


spots of different colors fuse, giving a chain of spots which are of 
one color above and another below. 

In Fig. 16 the spots composing the row BB are blue (dark) 
above, and red (light) below. It will be observed that the color is 
bilaterally symmetrical, as usual, about the axis through the middle 
of the cell. Such bicolored spots are often due to a simple fusion, 
as before stated; but sometimes they may, perhaps, be intrinsically 
bicolored. 

Fig. 15 is a beautiful instance of an exception to the general rule 
that spots are bilateral about the axis through the center of the cell. 
It is taken from Ornithoptera trojana Staudinger.) The light spots 
represented near the outer edge of the wing are of a brilliant irides- 
cent green, It is evident that they are distinctly bilateral with 
respect tothe nervures ; especially is this true of the pair adjacent to 
nervure 1. Ornithoptera brookiana Wallace illustrates another 
exception, though in a less marked degree.? Other allied species of 
Ornithoptera, however, would seem to show that these apparent 
exceptions may have been derived from forms which exhibited two 
spots in each cell and followed the usual rule. These are the only 
instances of such exceptions known to me. I do not doubt, how- 
ever, that further study would reveal others. 

In Fig. 17 an example is given of the peculiar kind of eye-spots 
found in the Saturnidae. The species from which the figure was 
taken is Saturnia spini. It will be seen that this so-called eye-spot 
is quite different in formation from the ocelli of butterflies. It is 
simply a series of curved cross-bands between nervures, arranged 
symmetrically on both sides of the cross vein CC. The « eye- 
spots” upon the wings of Attacus luna and in the genus Telea are 
also of this sort. True eye-spots, however, similar to those found 
among the Morphos and Satyridae, occur in moths, as in the apex 
of the fore wing of Samia cecropia, Callosamia promethea, ete. 
“Halse” eye-spots are also found on the wings of butterflies; in 
Vanessa io, for example, the so-called eye-spot of the fore wing has 
been shown by Dixey (90) to be made up of a series of fused 
spots. It will be remembered that Merrifield (94, Plate 9, Fig. 4) 
cau 


sed this “ ocellus” to break up into its constituents by subjecting 
the pupa to a temperature of 1° C, The ocellus upon the hind wing 
of Vanessa io is no doubt a true eye-spot; the only evidence which 
1 See Watkins, ’91, Plate 4. 


*See Hewitson, ’5€—76, Vol. 1. 


188 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


might lead one to infer that the ocellus of the fore wing was of the 
same character is, that an aberrant form is sometimes found in 
nature having the “eye-spots” on both fore and hind wings 
obliterated, thus indicating a possible connection between the two 
(see South, ’89). 

Fig. 18 is intended to illustrate the process of degeneration occur- 
ring in bands. Band BB is represented as breaking down by the rare 
method of parting in the middle. Example, Melinaea parallelis. 
Band EE is degenerating at one end; this is a very common 
method. 

Figs. 20-23 represent hypothetical conditions not found in nature ; 
all being contrary to the conditions of the laws which have just been 
stated. 

In Fig. 20 row RR presents three spots for each cell. TI believe 
this has not been found in nature, but I should not be surprised if 
it were discovered, for it is not contrary to any of the laws. 

Row GG, on the other hand, is contrary to the law of bilaterality, 
the crescents not being bilateral about axes passing through the 
middle of the interspaces parallel with the longitudinal nervures. 

Fig. 21 is intended to show a series of spots arranged side by 
side in twos in each cell, and of different colors. This, I believe, is 
impossible, for it is contrary to the law of bilaterality of color 
arrangement about the usual axis (HH, Figs. 6, 7). 

In Fig. 22 there are several conditions which are impossible ; e. 7., 
an eye-spot situated upon a neryure is never seen in nature, also 
two spots originally side by side, as in cell III, never rotate around 
each other so as to come to lie one above the other. Spots often 
move, however, as shown by the arrows in cell IV, thus giving 
rise to fusions; or they may move away from each other, causing a 
wider gap between the rows. In cell I are shown two looped 
spots. One form (A) is quite usual, being found indeed in Cymo- 
thoe caenis Drury.1 The other form of spot (D) is an impossibility, 
not being bilaterally symmetrical. 

Fig. 23 illustrates other impossibilities in color-pattern, none of 
them, of course, being found in nature. For example, one never 
finds a row of slanting spots such as SS. Also one never sees a 
row of similar spots in alternate interspaces, such as is shown in 
DD, for this would be contrary to the law that similar spots are 
repeated in a row of adjacent interspaces. These last four diagrams 


1 See Cramer (177982), Vol, 2, Plate 146. 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 189 


(Figs. 20-23) have been introduced merely to give an idea of the 
curiously strict limitations which nature has imposed upon the differ- 
entiation of the color-pattern. Many beautiful effects might have 
been produced, such for example as that of alternate interspaces 
showing different colors, but this is not seen in nature, 

It is interesting to recall the fact, that the colors themselves are 
impure and by no means so brilliant as they, perhaps, might have 
been, had Natural Selection been more severe in regard to color, 

There is doubtless some physiological reason why spots almost 
invariably appear and disappear in the middle of the interspaces, and 
when we know more of the anatomical and histological conditions 
of the wing during the development of the colors, we may be able to 
discover it. It will be remembered that in the developing pupal 
wings of Callosamia promethea and Danais plexippus I found that 
the colors first made their appearance in the interspaces, and finally 
spread out so as to tinge over the nervures. 


(4) Origin of Color- Variations, There is every reason to 
believe that all kinds of spots and bands, which are essentially 
only fused spots, may appear or disappear in any individual 
specimen without going through a long course of Natural Selection 
and slow phylogenetic differentiation. Darwin and Trimen (’71) 
and Bateson (’94) have demonstrated that this is true for eye-spots. 
In the Heliconidae I haye found that bands and rows of spots are 
very variable in different specimens of the same species (see Plate 7, 
Figs. 84-87). 

There is a large and widely scattered literature recording the 
appearance and disappearance of colors and markings upon the 
wings of Lepidoptera. Limits of time and space prohibit my doing 
justice to it here, but it may be well to call attention to a very few 
of the more recent papers upon the subject. Many of the color- 
aberrations recorded in this list of papers may be due to the direct 
influence of environmental conditions upon the individual, but others 
are no doubt true sports or, to speak crudely, “ congenital” variations, 
and might under favorable conditions of life become the ancestors 
of new varieties or species. It seems highly probable that new 
species often arise from just such sports in the manner so frequently 
and ably expounded by Bateson, 


\ 


190 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


PartiAL BiprioGRAPHY OF REMARKABLE COoLOR-ABERRATIONS IN 
LePIporrEera. 


Bairstow, 8, D.’77. Ent. Mo. Mag., Vol. 14, p. 67. (Zygaena filipendulae. ) 

Bran, T. E.’95. Can. Ent., Vol. 27, p. 87-93, Plate 2. (Nemeophila petrosa 
and varieties. ) 

Benson, E. F. °83. Entomologist, Vol. 16, p. 210. (Arge galathea. ) 

Breuse, L. 89. Feuille jeun. Natural., 19 Ann., p. 142-143. 

Breiener, F. 90. Bull. Soc. Ent. France, (6), Tome 10, p. 29-30. (Thecla 
rubi; Melithaea athalia.) 

Carnrineton, J.’78. Entomologist, Vol. 11, p. 97, Fig. (Cidaria suffumata.) 

Carrincton, J. 83. Entomologist, Vol. 16, p.1, Fig. (Callimorpha dominula.) 

Carrineron, J. 88. Entomologist, Vol. 21, p. 78, Fig. Editorial Note. (Arctia 
caia.) And numerous other papers in the Entomologist. 

Crark, J. A.’89. Entomologist, Vol. 22, p. 145-147, Plate 6. (Triphaena 
comes.) 

CockxereLt, T. D. A. °86. Entomologist, Vol. 19, p. 230-231. (Epinephele 
tithonus. ) 

Cockere.t, T. D. A. ’88. Entomologist, Vol. 21, p. 189. (Pieridae.) 

CocxereLL, T. D. A. ’89. Entomologist, Vol. 22, p. 1-6, 13, 20-21, 26-29, 54- 
56, 98-100, 125-130, 147-149, 185-186, 243-245. 

Dewirz, H.’85. Berlin. Ent. Zeitschr., Bd. 29, p. 142, Taf.2. (Precis amestris.) 

Epirors or Enromoroeist, *78. Entomologist, Vol. 11, p. 169-170, Plate 2. 
(Vanessa atalanta and several Lepidoptera. ) 

Epwarps, W. H. 68. Butterflies of North America. (Numerous plates.) 

Ferric, F. J. ’89. Feuille jeun. Natural., 19 Ann., p. 84. (Variations of 
Lepidoptera in Alsace.) 

Frren, E. A.’78. Entomologist, Vol. 11, p. 50-61, Plate. (Colias edusa. ) 

Goss, H.’78. Entomologist, Vol. 11, p. 75-74, Fig. (Chelonia villica.) 

Oxsertuiir, C.’89. Bull. Soc. Ent. France, (6), Tome 9, p. 74-76. 

Onertuiir, C. 93. Feuille jeun. Natural., 24 Ann., p. 2-4. 

Pousapn, G. A. ’91. Ann. Soc. Ent. France, (6), Tome 11, p. 597-598, 
Pl. 16. (Thais rumina.) 

Ricuarpson, N. M.’89. Ent. Mo, Mag., Vol. 25, p. 289-291. (Zygaena filipen- 
dulae.) 

Scupper, 8. H. ’89. Butterflies of New England, p. 1218. (Bibliography of 
variations of Pieris rapae.) 

Sourn, R.’89. Entomologist, Vol. 22, p. 218-221, Plate 8. ( Various Vanessidae.) 

Speyer, A. ’74. Stettiner Ent. Zeitung, Bd. 35, p. 98-1038. 

Tureve, H. ’84.- Berlin. Ent. Zeitschr., Bd. 28, p. 161-162, Fig. (Apatura iris.) 

Turr, J. W. °89. Entomologist, Vol. 22, p. 15, 160-161. (Melanie Agrotis 
corticea and pale variety of Lycaena bellargus. ) 


(5) Climate and Melanism. Word Walsingham (’85), in his 
presidential address before the Yorkshire Naturalists’ Union, brought 
forward the idea, that, although Arctic insects might be perfectly 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 191 


able to withstand the most severe cold while in hibernation during 
the winter, it is of great importance for them to absorb as much heat 
as possible during the short summer. He placed several species of 
lepidopterous larvae upon a snow surface exposed to bright sunshine. 
The snow melted at different rates under the various larvae, and 
in two hours the darkest insect had sunk by far the deepest into the 
snow, proving that it was the best absorber of heat. This ingeni- 
ous experiment of Lord Walsingham should be made the beginning 
of an extensive and careful research. 

Chapman (’88) has shown that it may be of advantage to moths 
inhabiting wet regions to display dark colors, or become melanie. 
His observations were made upon Diamea flagella, and he says that 
upon one showery afternoon he observed that one side of the tree 
trunks was wet and dark in color; the other side being dry was 
paler. “As a consequence, the dark specimens of flagella were very 
conspicuous upon the dry portions, hardly visible on the wet, whilst 
with the ordinary form the conditions were reversed, those on the 
wet bark were conspicuous, those on the dry much less so.” Per- 
haps the dull coloration of Arctic moths may be partially due to the 
effect of the somber background of rocks in the regions which they 
inhabit. t 

(6) Relation between Climate and Colors of Papitios. Yt is well 
known that the Lepidoptera in the Tropics display the richest 
variety and greatest number of colors. I have counted the colors 
exhibited by the 22 species of Papilio enumerated by Edwards as 
inhabiting North America north of Mexico, and also those which 
are displayed by the 200 species of Papilio named in Schatz’s list as 
found in South America. The “colors” were determined by com- 
parison with the colored plates in Ridgway (’86). 

In this manner it was determined that the North American 
Papilios exhibit 17 colors, viz., black, brown, primrose-yellow, canary- 
yellow, sulphur-yellow, orange, white, greenish white, apple-green, 
cream-color, azure-blue, sage-green, rufous, pearl-gray, indigo-blue, 
iridescent blue, iridescent green. 

On the other hand the South American Papilios exhibited 36 
colors, viz., black, translucent black, brown, white, canary-yellow, 
citron-yellow, olive-yellow, primrose-yellow, chrome-yellow, straw- 
yellow, gamboge-yellow, cream-color, greenish white, apple-green, 
malachite-green, emerald-green, sage-green, slaty green iridescence, 
pea-green, azure-blue, iridescent Berlin-blue, indigo, pearl-blue, 


192. BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


glaucous blue, salmon-buff, éeru-drab, flesh-color, coral-red, rose-red, 
vermilion, rufous, geranium-red, geranium-pink, olive-buff, iridescent 
geranium-pink (as in P. zeuxis), and transparent areas. 

As 200 species in South America display but 36 colors, while 22 
in North America show 17, it follows that, while the number of 
species in South America is 9 times as great as in North America, 
the number of colors displayed is only a little more than twice as great. 
The richer display of colors in the Tropics, therefore, may be due 
simply to the far greater number of species, which gives a better oppor- 
tunity for color-sports to arise, and not to any direct influence of the 
climate. The number of broods, also, which occur in a year is much 
greater in the Tropics than in the Temperate Zones, so that the Trop- 
ical species must possess a correspondingly greater opportunity to 
vary. 


V. Tue Causes wHich HAVE LED TO THE DrvELOPMENT AND 
PRESERVATION OF THE SCALES OF THE LEPIDOPTERA. 


(1) Experiments and Theory. Vt is well known that the scales 
of Lepidoptera are morphologically identical with hairs. Indeed, a 
graded series from simple hairs, such as are found covering the 
body-surface of most Arthropods, up to perfectly developed flat 
scales bearing well differentiated striae may usually be found upon 
one and the same insect. 

It is also remarkable that the color-bearing scales of beetles have 
been developed in the same manner as those of moths and butterflies, 
and that in this case also hairs have become differentiated into scales 
which are precisely similar in appearance to those of the Lepidoptera 
(see Dimmock, ’83). 

This is only another of the numerous instances met with in nature 
where similar conditions of selection have developed complex organs 
which are similar in appearance, though found in widely separated 
groups. <A list of papers relating to the development of scales has 
been given by Dimmock (’83, p. 1-11). 

Most of the hairs which cover the body-surface in Arthropods are 
true sensory structures, the axis of each of which is a protoplasmic 
process from a single cell of the hypodermis, which lies below the 
cuticula. They have probably been developed because the cuticula, 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 193 


being hard, chitinous, and inflexible, would serve but poorly as a 
tactile or sensory surface, 

Of course no one would venture to ascribe any sensory function to 
the scales which cover the wing-membranes of the Lepidoptera. 
We may, however, make several more or less reasonable hypotheses 
concerning the probable uses of the scales, and by testing these sup- 
positions arrive perhaps at some plausible explanation of their reten- 
tion and the complex development which they have undergone. 

(1) They may have caused the wings of the ancestors of the 
Lepidoptera to become more perfect as organs of flight, by causing 
the frictional resistance between the air and the wing-surface to 
become more nearly an optimum. 

(2) The appearance and development of the scales may have 
served, as Kellogg (94) has suggested, “to protect and to strengthen 
the wing-membranes.” 

(3) The present development of the scales may be due to the 
fact that they displayed colors which were in various ways advan- 
tageous to the insects. 

Concerning the first of these three hypotheses, the wing has, 
broadly speaking, two chief functions to perform in flight. It must 
beat more or less downward against the air, and must, in addition, 
glide or cut through the air, supporting the insect in its flight. For 
the mere beating against the air a relatively Jarge co-efficient of 
friction between the air and the wing might be advantageous; but 
for gliding and cutting through the air a smad/ co-efficient of friction 
would certainly be an advantage. There must therefore be an 
optimum co-eflicient of friction, which lies somewhere between these 
two. 

In order to determine the co-efticient of friction between the wing 
and the air, use was made of a method which, in one form or 
another, has long been known to engineers; that is, of observing the 
ratio of damping of the vibrations of a pendulum, 

It is well known that when a pendulum is swinging free, and 
uninfluenced by any frictional resistances, the law of its motion is 
expressed by the formula, 

2 

(QD) dA" sin 7 t 
where d is the displacement of the pendulum from its middle 
position after the interval of time t, A is the maximum displace- 
ment and T the time of a complete vibration, back and forth. Tf, 


194 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


however, frictional resistances interfere, the formula becomes, 
) 


(2)) do A e=* sin T t 7 
S. —log dT, ; 
(8) Tience, he A log e sin 27 t? Petey it — Wy 


—log d 
AT, log e 
where K is a constant dependent upon the friction, e is the base of 
the Napierian system of logarithms and 'T, is the time of a complete 
vibration, which may be different from the 'T, representing the time 
of vibration when not under the influence of friction. 

The plan was, then, to attach the wing of some large butterfly or 
moth to the end of a short, light pendulum in such a way that it 
would either fan against the air, or cut through it, and then to 
observe the ratio of damping of the pendulum’s vibrations. A 
drawing of the pendulum with a wing attached is given in Plate 1, 
Fig.3. The wing is here shown in the position for “cutting or glid- 
ing” through the air. It would be in the position for fanning against 
the air, if it were rotated 90°. The pendulum was made of brass 
and steel, the ends being of brass and the slender middle portion of 
steel. Its vibrations were read off upon an are graduated in milli- 
meters. The readings were certainly accurate down to 0.5 mm, 
The pendulum was hung upon a steel knife edge (x, N, Fig. 3), 
which rested upon firm level glass bearings. The pendulum was 
24.21 em. long, and weighed 19.61 grams. Its time of vibration 
(T,) was 0.877 seconds. This rate of vibration was practically 
unaltered when a wing was fastened to the end of the pendulum, 
the reason being that the wings were very light, the heaviest, that of 
Samia cecropia, weighing only 0.038 grams. The wing to be experi- 
mented upon was fitted into a deep, narrow slot at the free end of 
the pendulum, and then cemented in by means of a little melted 
beeswax. It thus became a perfectly rigid part of the pendulum 
itself. 

The pendulum with wing attached was deflected through a known 
are, read off upon the millimeter scale, and its reading at the end of 
the first swing carefully observed. Then if A be the initial deflee- 
tion, which we may call unity, and if d be the reading after the first 


d 


swing, the ratio of damping is given by the expression x In experi- 


(CA 


menting with a fore wing of Samia cecropia “fanning the air,” it 


a 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 195 


was found, as the mean of many trials, that this ratio of damping 
was 0.919, that is to say, the amplitude of the 2d swing was 0.919 
as great as the amplitude of the Ist, that of the 3d only 0.919 as 
great as that of the 2d, and so on. The scales were then carefully 
removed from the wing-membranes, by means of a camel’s hair brush, 
and by again testing the vibrations it was found that the new ratio of 
damping was 0.917. This is so near the value of the ratio of damp- 
ing with the scales on (0,919), that it may be considered identical, 
the difference being due to errors of experimentation. 

Hence we must conclude that the presence of the scales upon the 
wing-membrane has not altered, appreciably, the co-efficient of frie- 
tion which would exist between scaleless wing-membranes and the 
air. The results indicate rather, that when the scales appeared upon 
the wings of the scaleless, clear-winged ancestors of the Lepidoptera, 
the ¢o-efticient of friction remained unaltered. This tempts one to 
the further conclusions, that the co-efficient of friction between the 
air and the wings was already an optimum in these clear-winged an- 
cestors before the appearance of the scales, and therefore that Natural 
Selection would operate to keep it unaltered. 

A wing of Samia cecropia cut so as to give it the same shape and 
dimensions as one of Morpho menelaus, gave an identical damping 
ratio. I conclude that the co-efficient of friction may be the same 
for both moths and butterflies, at least for those which move their 
wings at about the same rate in flight. 

It was found in the case of the Samia cecropia wing, that when 
it was vibrated in the position for “ cutting through ” the air, the ratio 
of damping was 0.991. It will be remembered that, when the wing 
“fanned” the air, this ratio was 0.917. We may find the ratio be- 
tween the resistance encountered in “ fanning” and that encountered 
in “gliding” through the air by substituting these values in equa- 


—log d 


tion (4), K = 


C . 
Thus for fanning, A= 0.917 and T, = 0.877. Making A unity, 
—log 0.917 


0.877 log e — 
d = 
In cutting through the air, x =0.991 and T, as before = 0.877. 


—log 0.991 


Tans 


Hence in this case K = 


196 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


The wing, then, encounters at least 10 times the resistance in fan- 
ning that it does in gliding through the air. It should be said that 
this last experiment is somewhat crude, for the wing necessarily 
could not be made to cut the air with that delicate precision which 
is probably realized by the insect in flight. I should not be 
surprised, if in nature the insects encountered at least 20 times 
the resistance in beating the air, that they do in merely gliding 
through it. 

Concerning Mr. Kelloge’s supposition, that_the scales were devel- 
oped to “protect and to strengthen the wing-membranes,” I will 
admit that they may serve in some slight degree to protect the wing- 
membranes from scratches, etc.; but I am unable to accept his con- 
clusion, that they strengthen the wing-membranes, any more than 
that the shingles upon a roof serve to add strength to it. The 
wing-membranes themselves are tough, elastic, and not easily torn or 
scratched, and the scaleless wings of the Neuroptera and Hyme- 
noptera are very rarely found torn or scratched in nature. 

In 1858 Mr. Alexander Agassiz called attention (759) to the fact, 
that “ the nervures of the wings of butterflies are so arranged as to 
give the greatest lightness and strength; they are hollow, with their 
greatest diameter at the base of the wing, the point of greatest 
strain, their diameter gradually diminishing to the edge of the 
membrane. If a section be made across such a wing parallel to the 
axis of the body, we find very much the arrangement which has 
been experimentally proved by Fairbain and Stephenson as giving 
the greatest strength of beams, as exemplified in the tubular bridge. 
We find the strongest nervure placed either on or near the anterior 
edge of the upper wing; there is no such nervure on the lower 
wing, all being of nearly the same size, as such a one would have 


prevented the elasticity of the wing from assisting the flight to 


any considerable extent.” Mr. Agassiz has informed me that he 
carried out an extensive series of experiments upon the rigidity of 
the wings of various species of Lepidoptera. He placed little 
platinum strips upon the wings and observed the extent of the 
bending produced. His results demonstrated that the Sphinx moths 
possess by far the strongest wings, and that the Danaoid and 
Acraeoid Heliconidae have very weak wings. The reason for this 
probably lies in the fact, that the Sphinx moths move their wings 
with great rapidity, while, according to Bates (62) and all sub- 
sequent observers, the Heliconidae have a slow flight. 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 197 


As the scales have been developed not because they aided the 
insects in flight or strengthened the wings, their retention must 
have been due to some other cause, probably to their display- 
ing colors which were advantageous to their possessors in various 
ways. As Dimmock (’83) says, “it is only in insects where certain 
kinds of brilliant coloration have been developed that one finds 
scales.” Indeed, I believe that the vast majority of the scales 
found in Lepidoptera are merely color-bearing organs. They prob- 
ably first made their appearance upon small areas of the wings, 
perhaps adjacent to the body, and were merely colored hairs, sim- 
ilar to those of the surface of the body, which had grown out upon 
the wings. In this position they displayed some color which was 
of advantage to the insect; perhaps serving to render it less con- 
spicuous than formerly. Under these circumstances they would 
naturally be preserved through the operation of selection until 
finally they became modified into true scales; just as the hairs in 
the Coleoptera have undergone a similar modification. If this 
be true, it is easy to see how they might spread out over 
the surfaces of the wings until the whole wing became covered 
with scales, 

(2) Swmmary of Conclusions. The scales do not aid the insects 
in flight, for the wings have precisely the same efficiency as organs 
of flight when the sealesare removed. The phylogenetic appearance 
and development of the scales upon the scaleless ancestors of the 
Lepidoptera did not in the least alter the efficiency of their wings as 
organs of flight. This efficiency of their wing surfaces was probably, 
therefore, already an optimum before the scales appeared. The 
scales do not appreciably strengthen the wing-membranes, that 
function being performed by the nervures. The majority of the 
scales are merely color-bearing organs, which haye been developed 
under the influence of Natural Selection. 


PART B. 
COLOR-VARIATIONS IN THE HELICONIDAE. 


I. Genera CauskEsS WHICH DETERMINE COLORATION IN THE 
Thisticontpak. 


In 1861, after eleven years of study within the forests of South 
America, Bates read his, now classic, paper upon the life and habits 


198 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


of the Heliconidae of the Amazon region. In it he first brought 
forward his ingenious theory of Mimicry—a theory which, under 
the able interpretations of Wallace and Fritz Miiller, and in more 
recent times, under the impetus of the zeal of their numerous disci- 
ples, has yielded so much that is of interest to scientific men. 

The Heliconidae are, above all, creatures of the forest, and Bates 
found that the number of species increases as one travels inland 
from the Lower Amazons towards the eastern slopes of the Andes, 
so that the hot Andean valleys near Bogota, or in Ecuador, contain 
perhaps the greatest number. In their range they are restricted to 
the Tropics of the New World. Only two species, Dircenna klugii 
and Heliconius charitonius, extend so far north as the extreme South- 
ern States of the United States, and none of them are found much 
further south than 30° §. Lat. 

Bates and Felder first saw that the Heliconidae were naturally 
divided into two distinct groups. One, the Danaoid Heliconidae, 
consists of about twenty genera, all more or less closely related, and 
evidently an offshoot from the great universal family, the Danaidae, 
members of which are found in both Hemispheres. ‘The other group, 
the true Heliconidae, is composed of two closely related genera, Heli- 
conius and Eueides. They are allied in structure to the Acrae- 
idae and hence their name, Acraeoid Heliconidae, Schatz and Réber 
(8592, p. 105) say of the Acraeoid Heliconidae:— They are an 
offshoot of the great family Nymphalidae, which have undergone a 
remarkable development in the length of the fore wing, and in this 
respect have been developed in a direction parallel with the Danaoid 
Heliconidae. In their structure, however, they are quite distinct 
from the Danaoid group. 

Schatz has proposed a new classification for the Heliconidae, He 
finds that the genera Lycorea and Ituna, which Bates included among 
the Danaoid Heliconidae, are very closely allied to the Danaidae, he 
therefore says that Lycorea should be placed among the Danaidae, 
while [tuna is clearly midway between the Danaidae and the Dana- 
oid Heliconidae. Schatz proposes the name “ Neotropidae” for the 
Danaoid Heliconidae. TWowever, I think the name “ Danaoid Heli- 
conidae,” being older and more descriptive of their relationship, 
should by all means be retained. In this paper I shall follow Bates’s 
classification, and include among the Danaoid Heliconidae the twenty 
genera: Lycorea, Ituna, Athesis, Thyridia, Athyrtis, Olyras, Eutre- 
sis, Aprotopos, Dircenna, Callithomia, Epithomia, Ceratinia, Sais, 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 199 


Scada, Mechanitis, Napeogenes, Ithomia, Aeria, Melinaea, and 
Tithorea. The Acraeoid Heliconidae will then consist of the two 
remaining genera, Ieliconius and Eueides. 

Staudinger (84—88) records 453 species belonging to the Danaoid 
group, and 150 belonging to the Acraeoid group. 

Nearly all that we know concerning the early stages of the 
Heliconidae is due to Wilhelm Miiller (’86). THe gives figures and 
more or less complete descriptions of the early stages of Dircenna 
xantho, Ceratinia eupompe, Ithomia neglecta, Thyridia themisto, 
Mechanitis lysimnia, and also of Heliconius apseudes, IH. eucrate, H. 
doris, Kueides isabella, EK. aliphera, and E, pavana. Bates (762, p. 
596) says that he raised the larvae of Heliconius erato and Eueides 
lybia. Schatz and Réber (8592) figure the larva and pupa of 
Ceratinia euryanassa, Edwards has given a detailed account of the 
early stages of TH. charitonius. 

Miller found that the larvae of the Danaoid group feed on yarious 
species of Solanum, while the genera Heliconius and Kueides feed 
upon the Passifloreae, The larvae are conspicuously colored, and 
often gregarious; they seem to take but little pains to hide them- 
selves during the chrysalis stage, for Miiller says that he -has seen 
the silver-spotted, white chrysalids of Heliconius doris hanging in 
great numbers in the near neighborhood of the larval food plant. 
The mature insects also furnish a good example of what Wallace 
(67) designated as “ warning coloration,” for their tawny orange 
and black wings are very conspicuous as they sail slowly around in 
circles, settling at frequent intervals in their lazy irregular flight. 

Bates was the first to call attention to the circumstance that they 
often possess a rather strong and disagreeable odor, and in 1878 
Fritz Miller confirmed this observation for a number of the Heli- 
conidae, He found, for example, that the genera Ituna and Ilione 
have a pair of finger-like processes near the end of the abdomen, 
which can be protruded and then emit a rather disagreeable odor ; 
and he also found that the Acraeoid Heliconidae, especially the 
females, possess a disgusting odor. Seitz (89), however, examined 
about fifty species of Heliconidae and found that many of them 
appear to have no odor, For example, he says that THeliconius 
eucrate and Kueide dianasa have no odor, but that some specimens 
of Heliconius beskei, and EKueides aliphera have a horrid odor, 

Whether they are odorous or not, it would seem that the Heli- 
conidae have but few enemies to fear, for not one of the many 


200 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


skilled observers who have studied them in their native haunts has 
ever seen a bird attack them, and the only ground for believing that 
they are attacked rests upon the rather dubious evidence of a few 
specimens found by Fritz Miller having symmetrical pieces 
apparently bitten out of the hind wings. Belt (74) observed that a 
pair of birds which were bringing large numbers of dragon-flies and 
butterflies to their young never brought any of the Heliconidae, 
although these were abundant in the neighborhood. In fact, Belt 
was able to discover only one enemy of these butterflies, and that 
was a yellow and black wasp, which caught them and stored them 
up in its nest to feed its young. The Heliconidae then, in spite of 
their weak structure, conspicuous colors, and slow flight, enjoy a 
peculiar immunity. 

As is well known, Bates (62) first called attention to the fact that 
the Heliconidae were “ mimicked” or imitated both in color-pattern 
and shape of wings by a number of other genera of butterflies and 
even moths. Bates had no difficulty in showing that this mimicry 
might easily be explained upon the ground that the Heliconidae, on 
account of their bad taste and smell, were immune from the attacks 
of birds and other insectivorous animals, and that therefore it gave a 

- peculiar advantage to a butterfly belonging to any other group not 
thus protected, to assume the shape and coloration of the Heliconidae ; 
for then the birds could not perceive any difference between it and 
the true Heliconidae. Bates found that fifteen species of Pieridae 
belonging to the genera Leptalis and Euterpe, four Papilios, seven 
Erycinidae, and among diurnal moths three Castnias and fourteen 
Bombycidae imitate each some distinct species of the Heliconidae 
occupying the same district. Healso found that all of these insects 
were much rarer than the Heliconidae which they imitated. In some 
sases, indeed, he estimated the proportion to be less than one to a 
thousand. Wallace (89, p. 265), who has added so much to our 
knowledge of this subject, aptly defines this kind of mimicry as an 
“exceptional form of protective resemblance.” 

But by far the most remarkable discovery made by Bates was the 
fact, that species belonging to different genera of the Heliconidae 
themselves mimic one another. Neither Bates nor Wallace was 
able to give any satisfactory explanation of the cause of this latter 
form of mimicry, for all of the genera of the Heliconidae are 
immune. They therefore supposed it to be due to “unknown local 
causes,” or similarity of environment and conditions of life. 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 201 


Thus the matter rested until 1879, when Fritz Miiller brought out 
his well-known paper upon “Ituna and Thyridia, a remarkable 
example of mimicry,” in which he showed that both of these genera 
are protected, yet they mimic each other. He also showed that this 
mimicry might be due to Natural Selection brought about in the 
following manner. It is possible that young birds, upon leaving the 
nest, are not furnished with an unalterable instinct which tells them 
exactly what they should and should not eat; so they may try 
experiments, and would then in all probability taste a few of the 
Heliconidae before finding out that they were unfit to eat. Miiller 
then demonstrated that, if this supposition be true, it becomes a 
decided advantage to the various species of Heliconidae to resemble 
one another. His reasoning was as follows: Let it be supposed 
that the young and inexperienced birds of a region must destroy 
1,200 specimens of any distasteful species of butterfly before it 
becomes recognized as such, and let us assume further that there are 
in existence 2,000 specimens of species A, and 10,000 of species B ; 
then, if these species are different in appearance, each will lose 1,200 
individuals, but if they resemble each other so closely that they can- 
not be distinguished apart, the loss will be divided pro rata between 
them, and A will lose 200, and B 1,000; therefore A saves 1,000 or 
50% and B saves only 200 or 2% of the total number of individuals 
in the species ; hence, while the relative numbers of the two species 
are as 1 to 5, the relative advantage derived from the resemblance 
is as 25 to 1. 

Blackiston and Alexander (’84) have given a complete mathe- 
matical statement of Miiller’s law, and have come to the conclusion 
that, if the number of individuals destroyed is small compared with 
the number constituting the species, the relative advantage is 
inversely as the square of the original numbers; but if the number 
destroyed is large compared with the original number, the ratio of 
advantage is much greater than the inverse squares of the original 
numbers. Their deduction may be briefly stated as follows : — 


202 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


Designation of Species A B 
()eOniginal numbers a a> b 
(2) Number lost without imitation. . e— = 
(3) Remainders without imitation . . (a—e) (b—e) 

Shs tie a b 
(4) Number lost with imitation. . . prey Pa oS 


N atb 


be 
a+b a+b 


(5) Remainders with imitation a (4 sane ) b (1 — =H) 


(6) Excess of remainders due 
to imitation, or “abso- 
lute advantage” (3)—(5) 

(7) Ratio of excess to remainders 
without imitation (6): (3), 
=proportional advantage. 


a b e a 
arb a—e | atb ~boe 


é : e 
(8) Ratio of Pacpenianal advan- gaa)’ <a? (1 — +) 
tage of B to proportional ¢- = j=—,——-=7;,, ~+———~< 

; b (b—e) ~ b? e 
advantage of A. (1 ¥) 


It is evident, then, if e be small compared with a and b, that the 
proportional advantage of B is to the proportional advantage of A 


as a? is to b?. If, however, the loss (e) is great compared with a or 


b, the relative gain for the weaker species becomes even greater than 
the ratio of the squares of b and a. 

If it be true, then, that young birds, when they leave the nest, do 
not Possess a directing instinct telling them what they should and 
should not eat, but actually do experiment to some extent upon 
various insects which they meet with, Miiller’s law is amply sufficient 
to account for the numerous cases of mimicry and remarkably close 
resemblances which are found among the species of the Heliconidae 
themselves. 

Unfortunately no direct experiments have ever been made upon 
the feeding-habits of young South American birds, nor have the 
contents of their stomachs been examined, There have been a few 
experiments, however, which seem to support the idea that some 
animals do learn to associate an agreeable or disagreeable taste with 
the coloration and appearance of their prey. It is well known that 
Weismann (782, p. 336-339) found that the black and yellow 
larvae of Euchelia jacobaeae were refused by the green lizard of 
Europe. He then introduced some young caterpillars of Lasiocampa 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 2038 


rubi, which are very similar in appearance to those of Euchelia. 
The lizards first cautiously examined the larvae, and finally ate them. 
After this Weismann reintroduced the E, jacobaeae larvae and the 
lizards were seen to taste them, apparently mistaking them for the 
edible L. rubi caterpillars. 

Poulton (’87) carried out a most careful and well-conducted 
research upon the protective value of color and markings in insects 
in reference to their vertebrate enemies, He experimented upon three 
species of lizards and a tree-frog. Poulton combines his results with 
those of other observers and presents them in the form of a table, 
which certainly supports the suggestion of Wallace (’67), that 
brilliant and conspicuous larvae would be refused as food by some 
at least of their enemies. Poulton also shows that a limit to the 
success of this method of defence (conspicuous larvae haying 
unpleasant taste or smell) would result from the hunger which the 
success itself tends to produce. In the Tropics, indeed, where 
insectivorous birds and lizards are far more numerous than with us, 
and where competition for food is great among them, “we may feel 
sure that some at least would be sufficiently enterprising to make the 
best of unpleasant food, which has at least the advantage of being 
easily seen and caught.” This last suggestion of Poulton certainly 
seems reasonable ; moreover, it has occurred to me that young birds, 
being but little skilled in the art of obtaining their food, might quite 
often be forced by hunger to try various kinds of insects, and per- 
haps even the Heliconidae themselves. 

Beddard (92, p. 1538-167) reports the results of an extensive 
series of experiments carried out by Mr. Finn and himself upon 
marmosets, birds, lizards, and toads. He arrives at conclusions which 
are quite different from those of Poulton and others, but it appears 
to me that his experiments were by no means so critically performed 
as those of Poulton. He frequently threw larvae into a cage con- 
taining many birds and observed them struggle for the prey. It 
may well be, however, that a bird would be quite willing to swallow 
a very unsavory mouthful in order to prevent any of its companions 
from, apparently, enjoying it. However, Beddard found that 
toads will eat any insect without hesitation in spite of brilliant 
coloration, strong odors, or stings. He also found that birds and 
marmosets would often deyour “conspicuously colored ” larvae with- 
out any hesitation, and that some “protectively colored” or incon- 
spicuous larvae were refused. There can be no doubt that many 


204 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


insectivorous animals pay but little attention to the colors of their 
prey ; for example, it is well known to anglers that trout and salmon 
will snap at the most gaudily colored “flies,” which may or may not 
have any counterpart in nature. 

The whole question of warning coloration will have to be made 
the subject of an extensive research upon both old and young 
insectivorous animals before we can safely arrive at any certain con- 
clusions respecting it. 


Il. Mernops Pursvep In SrupyInc THE CoLor—PATTERNS OF 
THE HELICONIDAR. 


No comparative study of the color-patterns displayed by the 
Heliconidae has ever been made. In fact, very few such studies 
have been carried out upon any Lepidoptera. The only works I 
know of are those of Eimer (’89) and Haase (’92) upon the colora- 
tion of the Papilios, and of Dixey (’90) upon the wing-markings of 
certain genera of the Nymphalidae and Pieridae. The family of the 
Heliconidae with its numerous species and comparatively simple 
coloration affords an excellent opportunity for such a research. 

In making this study of the Heliconidae I was permitted through 
the kindness of Mr. Samuel Henshaw to make free use of the collec- 
tion in the Museum of Comparative Zoédlogy at Harvard, I also 
found the colored figures in the works of the following authors of 
great service: Hewitson (5676), C. und R. Felder (6467), Hiib- 
ner (0625), Humboldt et Bonpland (’33), Cramer (1779-’82), Stau- 
dinger (8488), Godman and Salvin (°79~86), and Ménétriés (’68) ; 
likewise the following shorter papers published in various serials : 
Bates (’63, 65), Butler (’65, ’69, 6974, ’77), Druce (76), Godman 
and Salvin (’80), Hewitson (54), Snellenen yan Leeuwen (’87), Srnka 
(84, °85), Staudinger (’82), and Weymer (75, 84). I was thus 
enabled to examine the color-patterns of 400 (89%) of the species 
of the Danaoid group, and of 129 (86%) of the Acraeoid group, 
either from the insects themselves or from figures given by the 
authors named above. The remaining species were either inaccessi- 
ble to me, or were so vaguely described as to be unayailable. A 
list of the species known to me is given in Table 28. 

(1) The Two Types of Coloration in the Danaoid Heliconidae. 
It is very remarkable that the color-patterns of all of the Heliconidae 


Oe 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 205 


may be grouped into two very closely related types. To the one of 
these I have given the name “ Melinaea type,” for it is characteristic 
of most of the species of the genus Melinaea. It is well represented 
by Figs. 46, 48, 49, 51, and 55-57 (Plate 4). The insects which 
belong to this type possess wings colored with rufous, black, and 
yellow. 

The other type I designate as the “ Jthomia type,” for it is very 
characteristic of most of the species of the genus Ithomia. Figs. 47 
and 52 (Plate 4) afford examples of it. This type differs from the 
Melinaea in that the rufous and yellow areas upon the wings have 
become transparent. 

There are, also, many species, found in numerous genera, which 
fall between these two types of coloration, for the yellow and rufous 
spots upon their wings have become translucent, so that one may 
speak of them as “translucent yellow” and “translucent rufous,” 
These spots are, so to speak, in process of becoming transparent, but 
a few yellow or rufous scales still remain dusted over the otherwise 
clear spaces. Most of the Dircennas are good examples of this type - 
(Fig. 54, Plate 4). 

Of the 400 species of the Danaoid Heliconidae, about 125 belong 

_ to the “ Melinaea type.” It is well represented by most of the 
species of the genera Lycorea, Athyrtis, Ceratinia, Mechanitis, and 
Melinaea, About 30 Ithomias and half a dozen Napeogenes also 
belong to it. About 160 species belong to the “ Ithomia type,” and 
of this number fully 120 belong to the genus Ithomia. The others 
are found in the genera Ceratinia, Napeogenes, Ituna, and Thyridia, 
and many of them resemble the Ithomias so closely that they are 
said to mimic them, About 100 species, some of which are found in 
almost all of the genera, are intermediate in their color-patterns 
between the Melinaea and the Ithomia types. The 15 remaining 
species are represented by Melinaea gazoria (Fig. 58, Plate 4), 
Ceratinia eupompe, and a few Ithomias, such as Ithomia hemixantho. 
In these furms almost all color has disappeared, so that the whole 
wing has become of a uniform dull translucent yellow, bordered on 
the outer edges by a grayish black. 

(2) Detailed Description of the Melinaea Type of Coloration. 
Figs. 46, 48, 49, 51, and 55-57 (Plate 4) afford examples of this type 
of coloration, In these insects we find the proximal half of the 
central cell of the fore wing occupied by a rufous-colored area, which 


I call the “inner rufous.’ It is marked I in all of the figures. 


206 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


Beyond the “inner rufous” we find a black spot, marked II in the 
figures. It usually occupies the middle region of the cell of the fore 
wing, and I have designated it as the “inner black.” Beyond the 
“inner black,” and occupying most of the outer portion of the cell 
of the fore wing, is a light-colored area, marked ITI in the figures. 
This area is rufous in color in Fig. 49, but it is usually yellow, as in 
Figs. 46, 48, 51,54-57, and I have called it the “inner yellow.” 
Beyond the “inner yellow,” and occupying the extreme outer 
portion of the cell, lies the “middle black” (IV). In many species 
it is fused, as in Figs, 46-48, 56, 57, with the large black area, the 
“outer black” (VII), which occupies the greater portion of the outer 
half of the fore wing. Just outside of the cell beyond the «middle 
black” one finds a well-developed yellow area (V), the “middle 
yellow,” and there is sometimes still another yellow patch beyond 
this, which is marked VI and called the “outer yellow.” Finally, 
one often finds a row of white or yellow spots, the “marginal spots” 
(IX), lying very near the outer margin of the fore wing (see Figs. 
~ 47-49, 51, 54, 56). These spots are very well developed in the 
genera Ceratinia, Napeogenes, Ithomia, and Meliraea. One more 
very characteristic marking of the fore wing remains to be noticed ; 
that is the longitudinal black stripe (VIII). Itis also worthy of note 
that the front costal edge of the fore wing is almost always tinged 
with black, c 
The pattern of the hind wing is quite simple. The ground color 
is usually rufous and a “middle black” band (XI) runs across the 
middle of the wing. The outer edge is bordered by the “outer 
black” (XIII). Above the “middle black” band lies the “inner 
rufous ” (X) of the hind wing, and below the “ middle black ” band 
one finds the “ outer rufous” (XII) of the hind wing. One often 
finds a row of white or yellow dots within the outer black border of 
the hind wing, and these I designate as the “ marginal spots” of the 
hind wing. 


The Lthomia type of coloration, it will be remembered, may be 
derived from the Melinaea, by simply imagining the rufous and 
yellow areas to have become transparent. Also the outer black 
usually suffers a reduction so as to become only a rather narrow 
border along the outer margin of the fore wing. Thyridia psidii 
(Fig. 47) is a good example of this type. It will be seen that the 
black areas remain about the same as in the Melinaea type, but that 


_MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 207 


the rufous and yellow have become transparent. The middle and 
outer yellow areas have also fused into a large transparent patch. 

Ithomia sao (Fig. 52, Plate 4) is another good example of the 
Ithomia type. In this particular species the “inner black” of the 
fore wing is absent, and the “middle black band” of the hind wing 
has disappeared. When we come to consider the other Ithomias, 
we shall find that in this genus it has probably fused with the 
marginal black of the hind wing. 

I have made a record of the color-variations that affect the 
various characteristic areas just considered, and have recorded them 
for every one of the species of the Danaoid and Aecraeoid Heliconidae 
known to me, As these records are too extensive for convenient 
inspection, I have condensed the results, and they will be found 
in Tables 1-27 inclusive. Thus, Table 1 gives the variations in 
color of the “inner rufous” area of the fore wing for each genus 
of the Danaoid Heliconidae; Table 2 records the variations of the 
“inner black”; Table 3 the “inner yellow” area, etc. In Table 1 
we find, for example, opposite the genus Ituna, the number 2 in the 
column labeled “transparent.” his indicates that in two species of 
Ituna the “ inner rufous” area is transparent. 

In order to facilitate the study of the color-patterns Dr. Dayen- 
port suggested that I make use of the ingenious projection method 
invented by Keeler (93). This method consists in “squaring the 
wing” in the manner shown in Figs. 4 and 5 (Plate 1). In Fig. 4 
the large rectangle (A, B, C, D) just at the right of the figure of the 
hind wing represents a kind of Mereator’s projection of the wing 
itself, The nervures 1%, 1%, 2, 3, ete., are represented by the 
vertical lines 14, 1%, 2, 3, ete., on the rectangle A, B, C, D. In cells 
I*, I®, and I*, (bounded by nervures 1%, 1°, and 2,) one finds a 
sinuous line winding across the middle of the cell. This line 
appears in the same relative position upon the rectangle A, B, C, D. 
The same is true of the eye-spot found in the cell bounded by 
nervures 2 and 3, and of all the other markings of the wings. 
The central cell of the wing itself is shown projected in the dotted 
rectangle E, I’, G, H. 

In the case of the fore wing (Fig. 5), the central cell of the wing 
is dotted, and is shown projected upon the similarly dotted area 
within the rectangle I, J, K, L. In other respects the method of 
projection is the same as in the case of the hind wing. 

In this manner the colors displayed by various species of Danaoid 


208 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


and Acraeoid Heliconidae have been represented in color in Plates 
5-8. Each large rectangle upon the left hand side of the Plate 
represents a hind wing, the small middle rectangles show the colors 
of the cell of the hind wing, and the right hand rectangles give the 
fore wings, all being projected in the manner illustrated in Figs. 4 
and 5, Plate 1. The chief advantage in Keeler’s projection method 
lies in the fact, that similar areas in the projection of the wings lie 
vertically under or over one another, and thus by merely glancing 
up or down the plates one may observe the color-variations which 
occur in homologous cells of all the species represented, 


III. Genrrat Discussion or tHe Conor-ParrerNs AND OF 
Mimicry in tar Genera Hericonrus anp Eve rprs. 


Among the species of the genera Heliconius and Eueides we find 
remarkably little variation in venation, but great diversity in color- 
pattern of the wings, and in this respect they are very different from 
the Danaoid Heliconidae, where, it will be remembered, we find fully 
twenty different types of venation and only two types of color- 
pattern. 

(1) The Four Color Types in the Genus Heliconius. Schatz 
and Rober (8592) divide the species of the genus Heliconius into 
four groups based on color differences, as follows:—(1) the 
“Antiochus group” (Plate 4, Fig. 50); (2) the “Erato group” 
(Fig. 60); (3) the “Melpomene group” (Fig. 59); and (4) the 
“Sylvanus group,” a good example of which is Heliconius eucrate 
(Fig. 58, Plate 4). ; 

It will become apparent through an inspection of Figs. 50, 60, 59, 
and 58, which represent respectively, Heliconius antiochus, H. erato, 
Hf. melpomene, and H. eucrate, that the first three are quite closely 
related in color-pattern, while the fourth (FH. eucrate) approaches 
very closely to the plan of coloration of the Melinaea type of the 
Danaoid Heliconidae. In fact this resemblance is so close that it 
may be safely said that the members of the “ Sylvanus group,” to 
which H, eucrate belongs, mimic the Danaoid Heliconidae. 

The “Antiochus group” is represented by Heliconius anti- 
ochus (Plate 4, Fig. 50, and Plate 5, Fig 62). HH. sara, H. galanthus, 
and TH. charitonius (Plate 5, Figs. 61, 63, 64) are also members of 
this group; other examples are H. apseudes, H. cydno, H. chiones, 
H. hahnesi, H. sappho, H. leuce, Tf. eleusinus, and H. clysonymus, 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 209 


These species are characterized by their blue iridescence, and the 
narrow yellow or white bands upon the primaries; the hind wings 
are pointed at the outer apex, and the venation approaches the type 
found in Eueides aliphera, H. ricini (Plate 5, Fig. 66) is a good 
example of a form intermediate in coloration between group 1 and 
the “ Erato group” (2). 

The type of group 2 is Heliconius erato (Plate 4, Fig. 60, and 
Plate 5, Figs. 67 and 68). This group is closely allied to group 1 in 
its characteristics. A good connecting link between groups 1 and 3, 
the “Melpomene group,” is H. phyllis (Fig. 65). 

The third, or “Melpomene group,” is represented by H. mel- 
pomene, IT. callicopis, IH. eybele, H. thelxiope, and IH. vesta (Plate 6, 
Figs. 70-74, and Plate 4, Fig. 59). H. vuleanus, H. venus, H. 
chestertonii, H. burneyi, and H. pachinus are also examples of this 
group. 

(2) Mimicry between the Genus Heliconius and the Danaoid 
Group. To Schatz’s group 4, the “ Sylvanus group,” belong all those 
species of Heliconius which have departed widely from the colora- 
tion pattern of the other three groups, and haye come to resemble 
various species of the genera Melinaea, Mechanitis, and Tithorea of 
the Danaoid Heliconidae, H. eucoma, H. eucrate, IH. dryalus, and H. 
sylvana (Plate 8, Figs. 88, 89, 91, and 95) are good examples of 
group 4. By glancing at the diagrams on Plate 8 it will be seen 
that H. dryalus resembles Melinaea paraiya very closely ; in fact, the 
likeness is so close that it is almost certain that no eye could distin- 
guish between the two insects when they are upon the wing. Another 
startling resemblance is that between I. eucrate and Melinaea thera 
(Plate 8, Figs. 91 and 92); moreover, there is but little difference 
between the color-patterns of H. eucrate, Eueides dianasa, and 
Mechanitis polymnia (Figs. 91, 93, and 94).  H. sylvana and 
Melinaea egina (Figs. 95 and 96) are also said to mimic each other. 
The resemblance certainly appears very close at a casual glance, yet 
when the colors are plotted, as in Figs. 95 and 96, the differences be- 
come quite apparent. HH. claudia (Plate 5, Fig. 69) is a good con- 
necting link between the Sylvanus group and the Melpomene group. 
In both the Melpomene and Sylvanus groups the venation has departed 
from the Kueides aliphera type, and the contour of the hind wings is 
much more rounded and elliptical than is the case in the Antiochus 
and Erato groups. (Compare Figs, 50 and 60 with Figs. 58 and 59, 
Plate 4.) There are rather less than twenty species which certainly 


210 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


belong to the Sylvanus group; among them may be mentioned, 
in addition to those already spoken of, Heliconius numata, which 
resembles Melinaea mneme and Tithorea harmonia; H. zuleica, which 
resembles a Mechanitis and is a good copy of Melinaea hezia; and 
Hi. metalilis, which is said to mimic Melinaea lilis; there are also 
striking resemblances between 


H. aurora and Melinaea lucifer ; H. messene and Melinaea mesenina ; 
H. eucrate and Mechanitis lysimnia; HH. hecalesia and Tithorea hecalesina; 
H. hecuba and Tithorea bonplandii; H. ethra and Mechanitis nesaea; 

H. formosus and Tithorea penthias ; H. pardalinus and Melinaea pardalis ; 
H. telchina and Melinaea imitata ; H. ismenius and Melinaea messatis. 


Most remarkable of all perhaps is the close resemblance between 
Heliconius aristiona, Mechanitis methone, and Ithomia fallax of 
Staudinger. In fact, Staudinger states in his ‘ Exotische Schmet- 
terlinge” that he hesitated for some time to describe Ithomia fallax 
on account of its close resemblance to Hewitson’s Mechanitis methone. 
Good lists of the Heliconidae which are said to mimic one another 
are given by Wallace (’89, p. 250, 251), and by Haase (93%, p. 
146, 147). 

(3) The Three Color-Types in the Genus Hueides. In the 
genus Eueides we meet with three color-types represented by 
E. aliphera, E. thales, and E. cleobaea, These insects are dis- 
tinctly smaller than the species of the genus Heliconius, and the 
yellow spots upon their primaries are more ocherous in color than 
in Heliconius. E, aliphera (Plate 6, Fig. 77) represents the most 
highly specialized color-type. Eueides mereaui (Fig. 76), however, 
is a good connecting link between the color-patterns of K. aliphera 
and E. thales (Fig. 75), and EK. thales is almost identical in color- 
pattern with Heliconius vesta (Fig. 74). 

The other type of Eueides is represented by EK. cleobaea, EK. 
dianaga, E. isabella, ete. (Plate 6, Fig. 78, and Plate 8, Fig. 93). 
These resemble the Sylvanus group of Heliconius or various Melinaeas 
and Mechanitis. 

(4) Detailed Discussion of Plates 5-8. Pare § is intended 
to illustrate the types of coloration found in the Antiochus and 
Erato groups of the genus Heliconius. In H, sara (Fig. 61) the 
wings are suffused with a dark blue iridescence, and some narrow 
yellow bands of color are found upon the primaries, In H. antiochus 
(Fig. 62) we find similar bands of color upon the primaries, but 
they are changed to white. HH. antiochus may have descended 


— a 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 211 


from an albinic sport of HI. sara. In I. galanthus (Fig. 63) 
the white areas have greatly increased in size, and the iridescent 
blue has become much lighter. In H. charitonius (Fig. 64) we 
find the wings crossed by yellow spots and bands, but in some speci- 
mens this yellow color exhibits a decidedly reddish tinge. The figure 
of TH. charitonius in Staudinger’s “Exotische Schmetterlinge ” illus- 
trates this peculiarity ; indeed, spots which are commonly yellow are 
often found red, and vice versa. In H, phyllis (Fig. 65) we find 
along the upper part of the diagram of the hind wing a yellow mark- 
ing, and a similarly shaped red mark is found in its near ally, H. 
thelxiope (Fig. 73, Plate 6). The same is also true of H. ricini 
(Fig. 66, Plate 5). 

H. erato (Figs, 67 and 68, Plate 5, and Fig. 60, Plate 4) is very 
remarkable, for there are no less than four distinct color-types 
exhibited by different individuals of this species; one of them (Fig. 
67) shows the basal half of the hind wing marked by six red tongues 
of color edged with iridescent blue, and there is a dark rufous 
suffusion upon some parts of the fore wing. In other specimens 
(Fig. 68) the red tongues of color which characterized the hind wing 
of Fig. 67 are almost absent, and only the blue iridescence is left ; 
also there is no rufous to be seen upon the fore wing. In another 
type the blue iridescence of the hind wing has become green, and in 
still other specimens the yellow stripes upon the fore wing have 
become white. 

As one looks over the diagrams upon Plates 5-8, it becomes evi- 
dent that yellow frequently changes to white, for we often find one 
or two species of a genus which exhibit white spots identical in shape 
and position with spots which are yellow in most of the others. Good 
examples of this are Hl. antiochus (Plate 5, Fig. 62), Melinaea 
parallelis and Ceratinia leucania (Plate 7, Figs. 82 and 83) ; likewise 
the white spot near the outer apex of the fore wing in II. eucrate 
(Plate 8, Fig. 91), which is yellow in many individuals. Yellow 
areas are also frequently changed to rufous or red ; thus the yellow 
basal half of the hind wing of H. eucrate (Plate 8, Fig. 91) is often 
found of a rufous tinge in individual specimens of the species, and 
among the specimens of this species in the Museum of Comparative 
Zodlogy one can trace a gradation of this area from bright yellow 
to rufous. 1. claudia (Plate 5, Fig. 69) is introduced in order to 
exhibit some of the differences between the “Sylvanus” group, to 
which it belongs, and the “ Antiochus” and “ Erato” groups. 


212 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


PLaAte 6G is intended to exhibit the characteristic color-patterns 
found in the Melpomene group and in the genus Eueides. Fig. 70 
represents H. melpomene, and Fig. 71 its near ally, H. callycopis, in 
which the red area of the fore wing has become broken up, and some 
red spots have made their appearance near the base of the hind wing. 
In the next variety of H. melpomene, H. cybele (Fig. 72), it is 
remarkable that the pattern of the fore wing has come to resemble 
the Sylvanus type, and is identical in general plan of coloration with 
the fore wings of the Melinaeas or Mechanitis (see Figs. 84 or 85, 
Plate 7, or Figs. 92 or 94, Plate 8). In its close ally, H. thelxiope 
(Fig. 73), a still nearer approach to the Melinaea type has come 
about by the development of a black band across the middle of the 
hind wing, and one has only to imagine a general fusion of the seven 
club-shaped red stripes of the hind wing in Fig, 73, Plate 6, in order 
to produce exactly the Melinaea type as exhibited, for example, by 
Eueides cleobaea (Fig. 78). In this connection it is worthy of note 
that Bates (62) showed that H. thelxiope was derived from H., 
melpomene, there being between the two many intermediate forms. 

H. vesta (Fig. 74) is evidently a close relative of H. thelxiope, 
and what is still more worthy of note is, that it is almost identical in 
the general effect of its color-pattern with Eueides thales (Mig. 75)! 
The yellow spots upon the fore wing of E. thales are, however, duller 
in hue than are those of H. vesta, and the insects are somewhat 
different in size, H. vesta spreading 78 mm., while E. thales spreads 
only 66 mm. It will be noticed that the chief difference between 
the color-patterns of these two species lies in the fact, that, while the 
black stripes of the hind wings in H. vesta lie along the nervures, in 
Eueides thales they occupy the middle of the cells themselves. The 
general resemblance of the two color-patterns may of course be 
merely accidental. An easy explanation, however, is afforded by 
the theory of mimicry, for the two species look very much alike 
until one subjects their color-patterns to close analysis, when 
remarkable differences appear. E. thales (Fig. 75) may have been 
derived from some such form as E. mereaui (Fig. 76), for one has 
merely to imagine a greater development of the black and a general 
deepening of the rufous upon the hind wing of E. mereaui to make 
it resemble E. thales quite closely. Finally, in E. aliphera (Fig. 77) 
the black serrated border of the hind wing is still more reduced, and 
the black stripe which crosses the cell of the fore wing in EK. mereaui 
is not present. 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 213 


PLare 7 is intended to illustrate the peculiarities of color-pattern 
found among the Danaoid Heliconidae. Thyridia psidii (Fig. 79) 
is an example of the transparent type of color-pattern found among 
the Danaoid Ieliconidae, and especially prevalent among the 
Ithomias. It will be seen by comparing Fig. 79 with the other 
figures upon Plates 7 and 8, that the chief difference lies in the fact, 
that in this type both the rufous and yellow areas haye become 
transparent. The black area of the fore wing has also suffered a 
reduction, especially along the outer margin of the wing. Inci- 
dentally it should be mentioned, that in this particular species the 
middle black band of the hind wing has become tilted up at a sharp 
angle, instead of crossing the wing horizontally. A life-size figure 
of the wings of Thyridia psidii is given on Plate 4, Fig. 47. 

In Napeogenes cyrianassa (Fig. 80) and Ceratinia vallonia (Fig. 
81) portions of the usually yellow and rufous areas have become 
transparent. 

The spots upon the fore wing of the Melinaeas are usually yellow, 

but in Melinaea parallelis (Fig. 82) they are white. It would seem 
that this form may have descended from some albinic sport. 
Ceratinia leucania (Fig. 83) resembles Melinaea parallelis so closely 
in general plan of coloration, that it is very difficult to distinguish 
between them, even when the two insects are seen side by side. 
Jeratinia leucania, however, is somewhat smaller than Melinaea 
parallelis. Both occupy the same region in Central America, and 
the specimens from which the diagrams were drawn came from 
Panama. 

Figs. 84-87 are drawn from yarious specimens of Mechanitis 
isthmia, all from Panama. They are intended to give some idea of 
the range of individual variation which is met with in this extremely 
variable form. The contraction of the middle black band of the 
hind wing in this form has already been noticed in the general 
discussion of the laws of color-pattern (see page 184). In Fig 87 it 
will be seen that the inner yellow stripe which usually crosses the cell 
of the fore wing has become very narrow and changed to a rufous 
color. However, upon the under surface of the wing it still remains 
as a yellow stripe. Indeed, in most color-changes the upper side of 
the wing seems to take the initiative, the under surface being more 
conservative. This is not true, however, in the Ithomias, where 
the black areas of the under side of the wings often are found to be 
rufous in color, while they still remain of the normal black upon the 


a 


214 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


upper surface. The colors of the under surface are, however, 
usually identical with those of the upper, though they are always 
duller in hue. This may be due to the fact, that the colors of the 
upper surface are more frequently seen than those of the lower, for 
these insects often float lazily along with their wings horizontally 
extended. The operation of Natural Selection would then be more 
severe with the upper surfaces than with the lower. 

Prare 8 gives an analysis of the color-patterns of some of the 
Heliconinae and those Melinaeas, ete., which they resemble. H. 
eucoma (Fig. 88) is a good example of the Sylvanus type, and with 
its rufous, yellow, and black wings it is certainly a wonderfully close 
copy of the color-pattern found so commonly among the species of 
the genus Melinaea of the Danaoid Heliconidae. 

Heliconius dryalus and Melinaea paraiya (Figs. 89, 90) resemble 
each other so closely in size, shape, and coloration, that it must be 
impossible to distinguish between them when the butterflies are in 
flight; yet an analysis of their color-patterns shows that there are 
considerable differences between them. The shape of the yellow 
bands upon the fore wings is quite different; the inner black spot 
within the cell is double in Melinaea paraiya, and there is also a row 
of white spots along the margin of the fore wing. 

A much closer resemblance is found between H. eucrate and 
Melinaea thera (Figs. 91 and 92), where the Heliconius is almost a 
true copy of the Melinaea. 

The color-patterns of Eueides dianasa (Fig. 93) and Mechanitis 
polymnia (Fig. 94) are also very nearly the same. Both are 
common species in Brazil. 

Heliconius sylvana is said by Bates and by Wallace to mimic 
Melinaea egina. It will be seen by reference to Figs. 95 and 96 
that their color-patterns are quite different in detail, yet the insects 
look very much alike when placed side by side, and may easily be 
mistaken for each other when upon the wing. Melinaea egina is 
much more common than Heliconius sylvana. 


IV. Generat Discussion or tie CoLtor—-PatrrERNS AND oF 
Mimicry Amone run Danaotp Heriiconmar. 


(1) The Origin of the Two Types of Coloration, The character 


of the variation in the Danaoid Fleliconidae is very different from 
that of the genera Heliconius and Eueides, for while there is great 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 215 


diversity of color-pattern and very little variation in venation among 
the species of the Acraeoid group, exactly the opposite condition is 
met with in the Danaoid group, where we find at least twenty 
different types of venation and only two types of color-pattern. 
One of these types of coloration is well exemplified by most of 
the Melinaeas (Fig, 48, Plate 4), and I have therefore called it the 
“ Melinaea” type. The other type is exemplified by most of the 
Ithomias (Figs. 47 and 52) and has been designated in this paper as 
the “ Ithomia” type. In the Melinaeas, it will be remembered, we 
find the rufous and black wings crossed by bands of yellow; while 
in the Ithomias, on the other hand, the rufous and yellow areas have 
become transparent, often leaving the wing as clear as glass, and the 
black, which is so characteristic of the outer half of the wing in the 
Melinaea type, has shrunk away until it has come to lie along the 
outer margin of the wing only. 

By a study of all the genera of Danaoid Heliconidae we gain light 
upon the question of the origin of the “ Melinaea” and “ Ithomia” 
types of coloration. As we have seen (page 198), the Danaoid 
Heliconidae are an offshoot from the great family Danaidae. Indeed,. 
two of the genera, Lycorea and Ituna, are so closely related to the 
Danaidae that Schatz and Réber (85-92) propose to include them 
within that family. There can be but little doubt that Lycorea and 
Ituna are remnants of the ancestral forms which long ago shot off from 
the Danaidae to form the Danaoid Heliconidae ; and it is interesting to 
note, that in these two patriarchal genera we find the two distinct 
types of color-pattern which are exhibited by the Danaoid Helico. 
nidae, for all of the five known species of Lycorea are good examples 
of the Melinaea type (see Lycorea ceres, Fig. 46, Plate 4), while the 
four known species of Ituna all exhibit the transparent, or Ithomia, 
type of coloration. In fact, in their color-patterns the species of 
Ituna remind one of gigantic Ithomias. The species of Lycorea, 
however, are colored very much after the pattern of the Danaidae, 
and indeed they have departed but little from the type of the 
members of the great family whence they sprang. On this account 
I believe that the Melinaea type of coloration, which is so charac- 
teristic of the species of Lycorea, is phylogenetically older than 
the Ithomia type. 

In order to account for the origin of the Ithomia type, we may 
assume that, shortly after the primeval forms of the Danaoid THeli- 
conidae began to segregate out from the Danaidae, the species were 


216 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


few and probably rare. Under these circumstances any given insect 
would gain but little advantage by resembling merely the general 
type of the coloration of its fellows. For the relative advantage 
gained by such imitation, according to Fritz Miiller’s law, increases 
inversely as the square of the fraction whose numerator is the actual 
number of the imitating form and whose denominator is the actual 
number of the imitated. Therefore when the insects were still rare 
there would be few to imitate and consequently but little advantage 
would be gained by the imitation. Imagine, for example, that a 
single insect happens to imitate the color-pattern of a group of 100, 
and that the advantage gained thereby is represented by the number 
1; it is evident from Fritz Miiller’s law that, if it happened to 
imitate the coloration of a group of 1,000, its relative advantage 
would be 100 instead of 1. We sce, then, that mimicry within the 
group of the Danaoid Heliconidae became an important factor only 
after the group was well established and the insects became common. 
During the early history of the race, then, there would be but little 
tendency towards conservatism of color-patterns, and when the 
“Tthomia” and “ Melinaea” types of coloration made their appear- 
ance, they both survived and now serve as the patterns for mimicry ; 
and this accounts very well for the remarkable fact, that there 
are no other types of coloration than these two to be found within 
the whole group with its 450 species! 

(2) Mimicry among the Danaoid Heliconidae. The genus 
Ithomia with its 230 species is the dominant genus of the Danaoid 
group, and in nearly all of the other genera individual species are 
found which have departed widely from their generic type of 
coloration and have assumed the clear wings of the Ithomias. A 
good idea of how far these interesting individuals may depart from 
the coloration of their type may be gained by comparing lig. 53, 
Plate 4, which represents Melinaea gazoria, with Fig. 48, which 
represents a typical Melinaea (M. paraiya). It is evident that 
Melinaea gazoria is startlingly like an Ithomia both in size and 
coloration, although it retains the venation and generic charac- 
teristics of a Melinaea, 

In Mechanitis, which is the most independent genus of the 
Melinaea type of coloration, all of the species are fair examples of 
the Melinaea type, except Mechanitis ortygia Druce, from Peru. 
Druce (’76) in his description of this curious little species states in 
astonishment that it possesses the venation of a Mechanitis, but the 
size and coloration of an Ithomia ! 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 217 


It is quite remarkable that although the genera Melinaea and 
Mechanitis serve as models of mimicry for the Acraeoid Heliconidae, 
they should themselves mimic Ithomia. 

The genus Ithomia is, however, the most independent of all the 
genera of the Danaoid group, and I know of remarkably few good 
instances in which an Ithomia has apparently departed from the 
coloration of its type to assume the guise of the Melinaeas. One good 
example of such a change, however, is afforded by Ithomia fallax of 
Southern Peru, which resembles either Mechanitis methone or Heli- 
conius aristiona of Colombia (see page 210), There is apparently 
a difficulty in ascribing this resemblance to mimicry, for the imitator 
and imitated do not occupy the same geographical regions. 

In direct contrast with the independence of the Ithomias stands 
the case of the genus Napeogenes ; for Godman and Salyin (7986) 
say of Napeogenes, that nearly every species mimics some Ithomia 
which occupies the same district; and thus almost the very existence 
of the genus would seem to depend upon its mimicry of Ithomia. 

It is not the purpose of this paper to discuss, in detail, the numerous 
interesting cases of mimicry which are believed to exist between 
members of the Danaoid THeliconidae. An excellent discussion of 
such cases, and of the relationships of the various genera, has been 
given by Haase (’93*, p. 116-127). 


V. QUANTITATIVE DETERMINATION OF THE VARIATIONS OF THE 
CHARACTERISTIC WiInc—MARKINGS IN THE ACRAEOID AND 
Danaorw Herriconmpar. 


(1) Variations of “Inner Rufous” Areas of the Fore and 
Hind Wings. Table 1 gives the color-variations which are exhibited 
by the “inner rufous” area of the fore wings in the Danaoid Heli- 
conidae, This area is marked I in all of the figures upon Plate 4. 
We learn from an inspection of Table 1 that this area is rufous in 
color in 124 species of the Danaoid Heliconidae, transparent in 152, 
black in 24, and that in the remainder it is more or less translucent, 
and of either a yellowish or rufous tinge. 

Table 10 shows the variations which come over the “inner 
rufous” area of the hind wings of the Danaoid Heliconidae. This 
area is marked X in the figures upon Plate 4. It is apparent at 
a glance that the variations which affect the inner rufous areas of 


218 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


both fore and hind wings are very similar, In order to exhibit this 
fact graphically, the color-variations have been laid off upon the 
diagram, Fig. 97, Plate 9. The base line is marked at equal inter- 
vals with the words “rufous,” “translucent rufous,” “translucent, 
slightly rufous,” “ transparent,” ete, and the ordinates show the 
number of species which exhibit the various colors, rufous, trans- 
lucent rufous, ete. For example, at the point “translucent rufous ” 
we find that the ordinate is 23; this indicates that in 23 species 
the area is translucent rufous in color. The points thus found 
upon the ordinates are successively joined by straight lines form- 
ing a zig-zag figure. ‘The full line represents the fore wing, and 
the dotted line the hind wing, and it becomes clearly evident from 
the closeness of these two zig-zag lines that the color of the inner 
rufous area of the fore wing (area I, Plate 4) is almost always 
sure to be identical with that of the inner rufous area of the hind 
wing (area X, Plate 4). We see, therefore, that whatever color- 
variation affects the inner rufous area of the fore wing, this area 
in the hind wing is almost always affected in the same manner. 

Fig. 99, Plate 9, is derived from Tables 15 and 24, which show 
the color-variations in the fore and hind wings of the genera Helico- 
nius and Eueides. It is seen that here also the colors of these two 
areas in both the fore and hind wings are almost always identical. 
We here meet with one of those interesitng physiological laws 
which are independent of Natural Selection, and the meaning of 
which remains a mystery, for surely we can see no reason on the 
ground of adaptation why similar areas upon both fore and hind 
wing should bear similar colors. 

(2) The “ Inner Black” Spot. Table 2 shows the presence or 
absence of the “inner black” spot in the Danaoid Heliconidae. 
This spot is marked II in the figures upon Plate 4. When pres- 
ent, it is always black in color and is usually found occupying the 
middle region of the cell of the fore wing. The table shows that 
it is about an even chance whether it be present or not, for it is 
absent in 210 species and present in 190, In the genus Ithomia, 
however, it is present in only one third of the species. What is 
most worthy of note concerning it, is the fact that it almost always 
appears, when present, as a single spot. Indeed, it appears as a 
double spot in only 7 species, and 5 of these belong to the genus 
Melinaea. A good example of its appearance as a double spot is 
found in Melinaea paraiya (Fig. 48, Plate 4). It will be remem- 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 219 


bered that there are 450 species in the Danaoid group; 25 of 
these belong to the genus Melinaea; yet among “these 25 we find 
5 exhibiting this marking as a double spot. Assuming that the 
doubling of this spot has arisen in each species as a sport, and that 
such a sport is as likely to appear in one species as in any other of 


the Danaoid group, then the chances against five such sports 


. : + 450449 448 x 447 X46 
appearing among the 25 Melinaeas is — SER DISCON IRE about 


2,830,000 to 1. Indeed, it is probable that all five of the species 
of Melinaea which exhibit the doubling of this spot are descend- 
ants of a single ancestor in which it appeared for the first time 
double, for the mathematical chance that one such ancestor should 
appear among the Melinaeas, rather than in any other genus, is 
evidently 1 in > or one chance in eighteen. The chance against 


two such unrelated ancestors is, however, eres or about 336 to 


1, and the chance against three is es or 6,560 to 1, ete. 

By reference to Table 16 we find that in the genera Heliconius 
and Kueides the inner black area is black or iridescent blue in all 
of the species of Heliconius, but absent in 5 of the 18 species of 
Eueides known to me. These 5 include Eueides aliphera and its 
allies. Now there are 150 known species of the Acraeoid Helico- 
nidae, and 24 of these belong to the genus Eueides; so it is evident 
that the mathematical chance against the supposition that five sports 
arose independently in the genus Eueides, in which the inner black 
was absent, is given by aaa or 13,900 to 1. It is there- 
fore probable that the five Eueides lacking the inner black are 
the descendants of a single ancestor, 

(3) Variations of the “ Inner Yellow” and “ Middle Yellow” 
Areas. Tables 8 and 5, and diagram Fig. 98, Plate 9, show the 
color-variations of the “inner yellow” and “middle yellow” areas 
in the fore wings of the Danaoid Heliconidae. These areas are 
marked III and V, respectively, in the figures upon Plate 4. The 
“inner yellow” area, it will be remembered, occupies the outer por- 
tion of the cell of the fore wing; while the “ middle yellow ” is found 
in the region just beyond the outer limits of the cell. The two areas 
are often fused together as in Figs. 47, 48, 50, 51, and 55, Plate 4. 
The inner yellow area is usually smaller than the middle yellow, 
and a comparison of Tables 3 and 5 will show that it is much more 
frequently obliterated by the encroachment of the rufous or black 


220 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


areas which surround it; for example, while the middle yellow is 
rufous in color in only 14 species, the inner yellow is rufous in 56; 
also the inner yellow area, being usually smaller and less conspicuous 
than the middle yellow, is less important in cases of mimicry, and 
the diagram Fig. 98, Plate 9, shows that it is much more variable 
in color than the middle yellow. The full zig-zag line in this figure 
represents the color-variations of the inner yellow, while the dotted 
zig-zag line gives the color-variations of the middle yellow. As 
there are nine color-variations displayed by each of these two areas, 
and as there are 400 species of the Danaoid Heliconidae recorded 
by me, it becomes evident that, if there were no color preferences 
displayed by these areas, there would probably be about 48°, or 44.4, 
species which would display it as rufous, 44.4 translucent, 44.4 yellow, 
etc. The heavy, straight, dotted line (Fig. 98, Plate 9) represents 
this ideal condition, which would be approximately realized were 
one color as likely to occur as another in the respective areas. Now 
it is evident from an inspection of the figure, that the full zig-zag 
line, which represents the color-variations of the “inner yellow,” 
approaches the straight line condition more nearly than does the 
dotted zig-zag line, which represents the middle yellow.! The 
inner yellow is therefore more liable to color-variations than the 
middle yellow; and this is what we should expect on account of 
its comparatively small size and its consequent inconspicuousness 
as a characteristic marking in cases of mimicry. 

A comparison of Figs. 97 and 98, Plate 9, is interesting, for it 
shows that the color-variations of the inner rufous are quite similar 
to those of the inner yellow and middle yellow. This serves to 
illustrate the close physiological relationship which exists between 
rufous and yellow. The two pigments are probably closely related 
chemically, for every ordinarily rufous area is sometimes found to be 
yellow, and vice versa. Yellow areas also often change to white. 
Rufous, yellow, and white are evidently closely related color-vari- 
ations.” 

1 This is not true for one color, white. 


2It may be well to mention here that the black areas upon the wings are subject to 
very little color-variation, In some cases, however, especially upon the under surfaces 
of the wings in Ithomia, the black has changed toa rufous or russet color, For example, 
‘Table 4 shows that the middle black area (1V in the figures upon Plate 4) is rufous in 
only 12 species out of the 400 which are recorded, and all of these 12 are Ithomias. Also 
Tables 7 and 13 show that the outer black of the fore wing, and the outer black of the 
hind wing are russet in 22and 11 species, respectively. HWvidently, black is a far more 
‘conservative color than rufous, yellow, or white. Probably black is also quite different 
from the other pigments chemically. 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 221 


Tables 17 and 19 show the color-variations affecting the “inner 
yellow ” and “ middle yellow” areas of the fore wing in Heliconius 
and Eueides. here is but little difference between the two tables, 
except that in 15 species of Heliconius the inner yellow is suffused 
with black or blue, while the middle yellow is never suffused by the 
outer black which surrounds it. Fig. 100, Plate 10, exhibits 
graphically the color-variation of these two areas, The “inner 
yellow” is represented as a full line, and the “middle yellow” as 
a dotted zig-zag. It is evident that here also the inner yellow is 
more variable in color than the middle yellow, for not only does the 
inner yellow area display two more colors, but its chart is a flatter 
zig-zag. 

(4) Variations of the « Middle Black” Mark of the Fore Wing. 
Table 4 shows the color-variation of the middle black mark (area 
IV in figures upon Plate 4). This marking lies along the extreme 
outer border of the central cell of the fore wing. It is small in area, 
but is rendered very conspicuous from the fact that it is situated be- 
tween the inner yellow and middle yellow markings. In spite of 
its small size, however, it is a remarkably permanent marking, for 
Table 4 shows that it is absent in only 20 out of 400 Danaoid Heli- 
conidae. In these 20 it has been obliterated by the fusion of the 
inner and middle yellow areas. It is worthy of note that in 12 
Ithomias it has become rufous in color. This change to rufous is 
the only color-change which the black areas of the wings ever 
display. 

Table 18 shows the variations of the middle black area for 
Heliconius and Eueides. 

(5) Variations of the “ Outer Yellow” Area of the Fore Wing. 
Table 6 shows the variations which affect the outer yellow area 
of the fore wings in the Danaoid Heliconidae. This area is marked 
VI in the figures upon Plate 4; it lies beyond the region of the 
middle yellow, but is usually more or less fused*with it. Table 6 is 
only approximately correct, owing to the difficulty in many cases of 
deciding whether the middle and outer yellow be really fused or not. 
It will be seen that in the genus Ithomia the middle and outer 
yellows are wholly fused in about 200 species. This is one of the 
marked characteristics of this very independent genus. 

Table 20 shows the color-variations of the outer yellow area in 
Heliconius and Eueides, This marking is present in 81 and absent 
in 48 of the Acraeoid group. It is much more widely separated 
from the middle yellow than is the case in the Danaoid group. 


222 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


(6) The relative Permanency of the Black Areas upon the Fore 
and Hind Wings. A study of the relative permanency of the 
various characteristic black markings upon the wings is of interest, 
for, if the generally accepted idea concerning the prevalence of 
mimicry within the group of the Danaoid Heliconidae be true, we 
should expect the most conspicuous markings to be the most perma- 
nent, for they are evidently of the most importance for mimicry. 
This is, however, not the case for the black markings. A good 
example of this fact is afforded by a comparison of the relative 
permanency of the black streak which extends along the extreme 
costal edge of the fore wing with the inner black spot (II in figures 
on Plate 4). The inner black spot is certainly a more conspicuous 
marking than this narrow black streak along the costal edge; yet it 
is much more variable, for Table 2 shows that it is present in 210 
and absent in 190 of the 400 Danaoid Heliconidae. In other words, 
it is about as likely to be present as absent. ‘The black streak upon 
the costal edge, on the other hand, is much more permanent, for it is 
absent in only 52 species out of the 400. 

Another good example of the inaccurracy of the supposition that 
large and conspicuously colored areas are always less variable than 
small ones, is derived from a comparison of the relative variability 
of the large outer black of the fore wing with the small outer 
black of the hind wing. Although the outer black area of the fore 
wing is usually much larger and more conspicuous than the outer 
black margin of the hind wing, it is more variable in color, for it is 
rufous in 22 species, while the outer black of the hind wing is 
rufous in only 11, out of the 400. 

In general, however, large colored areas are more permanent than 
small ones, as was found in the case of the inner and middle yellow 
areas (see page 220). Indeed, a good instance of this greater vari- 
ability of small color areas is afforded by the longitudinal black 
stripe marked VIII in the figures of Plate 4, for this is more 
variable than the larger outer black area of the fore wing. 

(7) The “ Middle Black Stripe” of the Hind Wing. In the 
genus Ithomia the middle black stripe (XI, Plate 4) has migrated 
downward, so that in many species it has become fused with the 
outer black margin, as in Ithomia sao (Fig. 52, Plate 4). In other 
cases there is still to be seen a narrow line of rufous color between 
the middle black band and the outer black margin of the hind 
wing. Such is the case in Ithomia nise (Fig. 54, Plate 4). In 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 223 


many other cases the outer black and middle black are completely 
fused, so far as the upper surface of the wings is concerned ; but, 
if one examines the under surface of the hind wings, it will be 
found that a narrow rufous streak still persists between the middle 
black band and the outer black margin of the hind wing. 

(8) Variations of the Marginal Spots of the Fore Wing. ‘The 
marginal spots are found very near the outer margin of the fore 
wing; they are usually either yellow or white, but in some few 
cases they are rufous. It appears from Table 9 that they are 
present in 146 and absent in 254 species of the 400 Danaoid Heli- 
conidae known to me. Fig. 101, Plate 10, shows graphically 
the manner in which these spots occur in those species which 
possess them. It is evident from this curve that the number of 
these spots is not determined merely by chance, for they show a 
marked tendency to appear either as 2 or 3, or as 6 or 7 spots. 
It is due to this fact, that there are two maximum points upon 
the diagram Fig. 101, Plate 10. In those species which exhibit the 
“2. or 3-spot” condition, the spots are found near the front apex 
of the fore wing. In the “ 6- or 7-spot” condition they lie all along 
the outer margin of the fore wing, one spot in each cell. In the 
genera Ithomia, Napeogenes, and especially in Ceratinia these mar- 
ginal spots have become large and conspicuous ornaments. (See 
Fig. 49, Plate 4.) 

Table 22 shows the manner of appearance of these spots in the 
genera Heliconius and Eueides. They are found in only 26 species 
of the 129 known to me; and this number is far too small to war- 
rant general conclusions concerning the order of their appearance. 

(9) The Marginal Spots of the Hind Wing. Table 14 illus- 
trates the manner in which the marginal spots of the hind wings 
make their appearance. They are absent in 279 and present in 
121 of the 400 species of the Danaoid group, Thus they occur 
rather less frequently than the marginal spots of the fore wing. In 
the 121 species in which these spots are found they show a decided 
tendency to appear either as 4 or as 5 spots. Fig. 102, Plate 10, 
is a graphic representation of the distribution of these spots, derived 
from Table 14. It appears that the outline of the figure approaches 
a probability curve, and is approximately symmetrical about the 
mean ordinate (A, B), situated at 4.54. 


224 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


VI. Comparison OF THE CoLor-V ARIATIONS OF THE PAPILiOs OF 
Sourm AmpRICA WITH THOSE oF THE HeELiconIDAn. 


In order to emphasize the peculiarities of the coloration of the 
Heliconidae, I will conclude by instituting a comparison between 
their variations and those of the South American Papilios. There 
are about 200 species of Papilio in South America, and these display 
in all 86 distinct colors. The colors have been determined by 
reference to the plates in Ridgway’s “Nomenclature of color for 
naturalists.” A list of the colors which are displayed by these Papi- 
lios has already been given upon page 191. 

By exercising a very fine discrimination in distinguishing color we 
may count 15 distinct colors which are displayed by the 450 mem- 
bers of the Danaoid Heliconidae, as follows: black, brown, translu- 
cent black, sulphur-yellow, canary-yellow, citron-yellow, primrose- 
yellow, yellow-rufous, reddish rufous, rufous, white, translucent yel- 
low, translucent rufous, transparent areas upon the wings, transpar- 
ent areas which display iridescence. We see, then, that while the 
200 species of Papilio display 36 different colors, the 450 Danaoid 
Heliconidae exhibit only 15. In other words, the nwmbers of the 
species and of the colors are almost in inverse ratio in the two 
groups; for while the Papilios are only ¢ as numerous as the 
Danaoid Heliconidae, they display almost 1° times as many colors; 
and this is all the more remarkable when we remember that the gen- 
eral class of coloration in the Papilios and Danaoid Heliconidae is 
apparently the same. That is to say, in both groups we find all of 
the species displaying decidedly conspicuous colors, the coloration 
of the upper surfaces of the wings being in both rather more bril- 
liant than that of the lower surfaces, but without essential differences 
in color-pattern, Nor is there an attempt in either case at protective 
resemblances, such asthe imitation of the coloration of bark, leaves, 
etc. The color-patterns of the Papilios are, moreover, extremely 
complex, and upon comparing the different species, there are seen 
to be frequent fusions and obliterations of the characteristic mark- 
ings, so that Haase (’93), who has made an extensive study of their 
color-patterns, is forced to divide them into many small groups 
of a few species each. The variation in the form of the wings is 
also very great among the Papilios, for while P. protesilaus pos- 
sesses upon its hind wings, long tail-like appendages, the hind 
wings of P. hahneli are rounded off and without marked appendages. 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 225 


There is, apparently, but one important respect in which the 
Danaoid Heliconidae are more variable than the Papilios, and that 
is size. For example, Lycorea ceres, which is probably the largest 
of the Danaoid group, has 2.2 times the spread of wing of Ithomia 
nise, which is one of the smallest (see Plate 4, Figs. 46 and 54). 
The largest Papilio, P. androgea, on the other hand, spreads only 
2.16 times as much as the smallest, P. triopas. 

There is another minor respect in which the color-patterns of the 
Papilios are different from those of the Heliconidae. In the Heli- 
conidae the fore wing slightly overlaps the hind wing, and that por- 
tion of the hind wing which is hidden from view is always dull in 
color (see Plates 5-8). In the Papilios, however, the fore wing 
does not overlap the hind wing to such an extent as in the Helico- 
nidae, and it is worthy of note that the costal edges of the hind 
wings in the Papilios are as brilliantly colored as are any other por- 
tions of the wings. 

It is difficult to account for the remarkable conservatism in respect 
to color-variations among the Heliconidae, unless we resort to the 
explanation afforded by the theory of mimicry; for, while there is 
such remarkable simplicity and uniformity of color-pattern through- 
out the whole group of the Heliconidae, individual variations 
are very common, In the collection at the Museum of Compara- 
tive Zodlogy, for example, one finds a regularly graded series of 
specimens of Heliconius eucrate; at one end of this series the 
“inner rufous” area of the hind wing is bright yellow, and at 
the other end it is rufous; intermediate specimens are found in 
which this area is yellow, but dusted over with rufous scales. Also 
the “middle black band” of the hind wings in Melinaea parallelis 
is very variable, some specimens showing it broken in the middle 
(Plate 7, Fig. 82), and others haying it as an entire band, I have 
also seen one specimen of HH. burneyi in which the commonly 
yellow spots upon the under surface of the wings were changed to 
white. Another good instance of individual variability is afforded 
by H. phyllis (Plate 5, Fig. 65), for in this species the series of 
small red spots sometimes found just below the yellow band upon 
the hind wing is very variable, and more often absent than present. 
Still other instances of individual variability are seen in the yellow 
stripes upon the wings of FH. charitonius (Plate 5, Fig. 64), which 
are often found tinged with rufous. Also the remarkable diversity 
in Mechanitis polymnia, and M., isthmia (Plate 7, Figs. 84-87) are 


226 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


other examples which show that there is no lack of individual vari- 
ability among the Heliconidae. Yet the Danaoid species as a whole 
vary but little from the two great types of coloration represented 
by Ithomia and Melinaea, and in this respect they are very differ- 
ent from the Papilios, where we find a great many color-types and 
great diversity in shape of wings. Surely there must be some cause 
for the remarkable fact that the Danaoid Heliconidae with their 
453 species should display but two types of color-pattern. I can 
think of but one explanation, which is afforded by Fritz Miiller’s 
theory of mimicry. 


In conclusion it gives me pleasure to thank those friends whose 
generous aid and kindness have done so much to render the prose- 
cution of this research a pleasure to me. I wish to express my 
gratitude to Dr. Charles B. Davenport, who is the real instigator 
and promoter of this research; to Mr. Samuel Henshaw, to whom 
I am indebted for numerous kindnesses, and who placed at my dis- 
posal the extensive entomologicai collections and library of the 
Museum of Comparative Zodlogy at Harvard; to Prof. Edward L. 
Mark for his kindness in revising the manuscript of this paper, and 
for the numerous valuable suggestions which he has made; to Dr, 
Samuel H. Scudder, to whom I am grateful for much kind advice 
and for the use of rare works in his library; to Prof. Ogden N. 
Rood for his valuable suggestions in regard to the spectroscopic 
apparatus; to Dr. Alpheus Hyatt for his valued and kind advice, 
and to my father, Prof. Alfred M. Mayer, for the use of Maxwell’s 
dises and the direct-vision spectroscope. 


PART C. 


GENERAL SUMMARY OF RESULTS BELIEVED TO 
BE NEW TO SCIENCE, 


(1) The great majority of the colors of Lepidoptera contain a 
surprisingly large percentage of black (p. 172). 

(2) The colors displayed by the scales are not simple, but com- 
pounded of several different colors (p. 173). 

(3) The pigments of the scales of Lepidoptera are derived by 
various chemical processes from the blood, or haemolymph, of the 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 227 


pupa. The pupal blood of the Saturnidae is a proteid substance 
containing egg albumen, globulin, fibrin, xanthophyll, orthophos- 
phorie acid, iron, potassium, and sodium (p. 176). 

(4) In Callosamia promethea and Danais plexippus the pupal 
wings are at first perfectly transparent, then white, then impure 
yellow, excepting upon those portions which are destined to remain 
white in the mature wing. The mature colors then begin to appear 
near the central areas of the wings and between the nervures. Last 
of all, the nervures themselves become tinged with the mature 
colors. The central portions of the wings acquire their mature 
colors before the outer and costal edges, or the root of the wing 
adjacent to the body (p. 178, Plate 3). 

(5) The white stage in the development of color in the pupal 
wings represents the condition in which the scales are perfectly 
formed but lack the pigment which is destined to be introduced 
later (p. 178). (See, also, Mayer, ’96, p. 230.) 

(6) Dull ocher-yellows and drabs are, phylogenetically speaking, 
the oldest pigmental colors in the Lepidoptera. The more brilliant 
colors, such as bright yellows, reds, and pigmental greens, are 
derived by complex chemical processes and are, phylogenetically 
speaking, of recent appearance (p. 178). (See, also, Mayer, °96, p. 
232.) 

(7) While the number of species of Papilio in South America 
is 9 times as great as in North America, the number of colors which 
they display is only twice as great. Hence the greater number of 
colors displayed by the tropical forms may be due simply to the 
far greater number of the species, and not to any direct influence 
of the climate (p. 191). 

(8) The following laws control the color-patterns of butterflies 
and moths: (a) Any spot found upon the wing of a butterfly or 
moth tends to be bilaterally symmetrical, both as regards form and 
color; and the axis of symmetry is a line passing through the center 
of the interspace in which the spot is found, parallel to the longi- 
tudinal nervures (p. 183). (b) Spots tend to appear not in one 
interspace only, but in homologous places in a row of adjacent 
interspaces (p. 1883). (¢) Bands of color are often made by the 
fusion of a row of adjacent spots, and, conversely, chains of spots 
are often formed by the breaking up of bands (p. 183). (d) When 
in process of disappearance, bands of color usually shrink away at 
one end (p. 184). (e) The ends of a series of spots are more 


228 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


variable than the middle. This is only a special case of Bateson’s 
(94) law (p. 185). (f) The position of spots situated near the 
outer edges of the wing is largely controlled by the wing-folds or 
creases (p. 185). 

(9) The scales in Lepidoptera do not strengthen the wings or 
aid the insects in flight. The vast majority of the scales are merely 
color-bearing organs, which have been developed under the influence 
of Natural Selection. The phylogenetic appearance and develop- 
ment of scales upon the originally scaleless ancestors of the Lepi- 
doptera did not alter the efficiency of their wings as organs of flight. 
It is probable, therefore, that this efficiency was an optimum before 
the scales appeared (p. 197). 

(10) A systematic study of the Danaoid Heliconidae demon- 
strates that their color-patterns can be placed in two types. Type 1, 
the more complex, is closely related to the coloration of the Danaidae 
from which the Danaoid Heliconidae sprang, and is therefore, 
phylogenetically speaking, the older type of coloration. This type 
is characteristic of the genera Lycorea, Melinaea, and Mechanitis, 
and I have called it the “ Melinaea” type. It is characterized by 
the fact that the wings are rufous and black in color, and crossed by 
a definite system of yellow bands. Type 2, the “ Ithomia” type, is 
characteristic of the genera Ithomia, Ituna, and Thyridia. The 
“Tthomia” type has been derived from the “ Melinaea” by the 
originally rufous and yellow areas upon the wings having become 
transparent (p. 204). 

(11) The phylogenetic origin of the “ Melinaea” and “ Ithomia” 
types of coloration can be accounted for upon the supposition, that 
when the species of the Danaoid Heliconidae began to segregate 
out from the Danaidae they were for a time rare (p. 215). « 

(12) A record of the characteristic markings upon the wings of 
the Danaoid and Acraeoid Heliconidae shows that, physiologically 
speaking, the colors red, rufous, yellow, and white are closely 
related, and that black is quite distinct from these, being the least 
variable color of all (p. 220). 

(13) In both the Danaoid and Acraeoid Heliconidae, whatever 
color-variation affects that part of the fore wing which is adjacent 
to the body of the insect, almost always the same color-yariation 
affects the homologous area of the hind wing in a similar manner 
(p. 218, and Fig. 99). 

(14) The smaller yellow spots upon the wings of the Heliconi- 


: CE 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 229 


dae are more liable to color-variations than are the larger ones. 
This is what we should expect, if the theory of mimicry be true; 
for large spots are more conspicuous, and therefore their preservation 
is more important (p. 220). This rule, however, does not hold for 
the black markings of the wing (p. 222). 

(15) The mathematical chance against five similar and inde- 
pendent color-sports arising in the genus Melinaea is as 2,830,000 
to 1. Hence, the five Melinaeas which display the “inner black” 
as a double spot are probably descended from a single ancestor (p. 
219). 

(16) The marginal spots of the fore wing in the Danaoid Heli- 
conidae show a marked tendency to appear either as 2 or 3, or else 
as 6 or 7 spots (p. 223, Fig. 101). The marginal spots of the hind 
wing show a marked tendency to appear either as 4 or 5 spots 
(p. 228, and Fig, 102). 

(17) The 200 species of Papilio in South America display 36 
distinct colors, while the 450 species of Danaoid Heliconidae exhibit 
only 15. Hence the numbers of the species and of the colors are 
almost in inverse ratio in the two groups. This may be explained 
by the fact, that the Danaoid Heliconidae mimic one another, while 
the Papilios do not (p. 224). 

(18) The colors are dull upon those portions of the hind wing 
which are hidden from view by the overlapping fore wing (p. 225). 

(19) There is no lack of individual variability among the species 
of the Danaoid Heliconidae; yet the species as a whole vary but 
little from the two ‘great types of color-pattern represented by 
Melinaea and Ithomia, In order to account for this remarkable 
fact I am forced to resort to Fritz Miiller’s theory of mimicry (p. 
225). 


2 » a i 
is rn - i - 
4 vi eg i 


; Le te 


a La 


omananive 20000". 


TABLE 1. 


Showing the Variations in Color of the “Inner Rufous” (Area — 
I in Figures on Plate 4) of the fore wing in the Danaoid Heli- 
conidae, 


tly yel- 


GENERA, 


rufous. 
slightly ru- 
fous. 
yellow. 


Transparent. 
ae 


Translucent 
Translucent, 
eee 
ow. 
Translucent 


——S..-§-» ———.-_ |» ———. | | | | | |r 


Lycorea 
LGU Gee be ist ain cal 2 
NUNERIS eos a se es 2 1 
Thyridia Be ae op 5 
Athyrtis 
Olyras 
Eutresis Rwy Mes 
Aprotopos ... . 1 
MDINGeNna yes 1 
Callithomia ... . 1 
Epithomia. ... . 1 
P @eratinia- . 3: . % 28 
a Sais . 5 
, Cis ie Seana gy enna if 
a Mechanitis .... 18 1 
Napeogenes ... . 7 3 3 
Mthomige «9 « .. 29; 18) 16] 120] 26 5 
4 
2 


mb 


tw 


ee iv) 
rs 
w 
— 
w Nee — 
J 


wwe 


> Aeria Sates Mears 
Melinnda: es fy a 22 
Mithorea 2 7, Gs 4 ‘ 6 


SO GS tt Outen er en eee ews 2B e bel! BON! 2a 1} 24 1 


| | fe | 


Excluding Ithomia —. 95 | 10 8 | 32 4| 17 1} 21 0 


Note: The costal edge of the fore wing is usually black; it is rufous or brown, how- 
ever, in 47 Ithomias and dull yellow in one; it is rufous in two species of Sais, in one 
species of Ceratinia, and in one species of Athesis. Hence it is black in 348 species and 
light colored in 52, 


» 


TABLE 2. 


Showing the Variation (presence or absence) of the “Inner 
Black” (Area IT) of the fore wing in the Danaoid Heliconidae. 


a| 
GENERA. 2 3 
ule 
.  Lycorea 5 
Ttuna 8 
. Athesis ii Ay é 
; Thyridia 5 
Ss ; Athyrtis 2 
; Olyras . 4 
Butresis .. 2 
: Aprotopos 2 
X Direenna . 8] 4 
Callithomia 3 
—ipithomias fs 2 
Ceratinias. 2 9. =. 20) (012 > 
HIRE eerie ce rie tone kris Ania: 
SOBUHnito es fers re ts if 
Mechanitis .... | 28/ 1 
Napeogenes ... . 13 | 17 | Appears as 2 spots in 1 species. 
Mubomi ae sates ek 72 |140 | Appears as 2 spots in 1 species. 
Aeria tation ee 4 
Melinaea . . . . . | 21 3 | Appears as 2 spots in 5 species. 
; “APICES Sooper a 1) 
Miltoy Ml) oesevemetye el crate separ 4! (Oe) flfeTa) 
Excluding Ithomia . |138 | 50 | 


TABLE 3. 


Showing the Variations in Color of the “Inner Yellow” (Area | 
IIL) of the fore wing in the Danaoid Heliconidae. 


‘7 
nerally 


fous. 


Translucent 
slightly ru- 
slightly yel- 
low. 
Translucent 
yellow. 
Yellow. 
lac 
White, 
aeceek 


Translucent 


tr: 


Lycorea 
Ttuna Sore eke 3 
PAUINORI NS tah ii) hae rik 2 1 
‘Thyridia ee chon 5 
PADIS! cee ee 1 1 J 
OLGNASi co) Net eee. 4 d - .* 
SNGLBRIS: 2 crecene 1 if : ; 
a Aprotopos ... . 
MOIGOMMAN sees cena 1 2 3 
_ Callithomia 
‘ Epithomia ... . ut 
¢ (Ceratinians . a . & 16 1 1 7 it 2 
RIBS asi ae peters saa a 2 
Bcadar a6) 2 7 
Mechanitis .... 11 
Napeogenes ... . 2 4| 14 1 4 
9 
4 


Qe 


a1 


pnoMmia; teas. a. ie LO) ae |) as | 124s 28 
Aeria ities ee anar P 

Melinaea . .... 14 

7 Tithorea 


ee 
ORR NW&rt& 


, PR UOUHN ice ts) iat coe es 66} 138) 24] 158) 388] 31] 64 6} 10 


Excluding Ithomia . 46 2) 10| 84) 16| 22] 61 53 eas 


TABLE 4. 


Showing the presence or absence of the “Middle Black” Mark 
(Area IV) of the fore wing in the Danaoid Heliconidae. 


Present, but changed to 


GENERA, Present. Absent. some color other than black, 


Lycorea 5 -# 
Ttuna 3 ; 
Athesis 3 

Thyridia 5 

Athyrtis 2 

Olyras . 2 

Eutresis 2 

Aprotopos 2 

Direcenna . 11 1 

Callithomia 3 

Epithomia 2 

Ceratinia . 34 7 

Sais . 5 

Scada .. Wee il 

Mechanitis .... 24 

Napeogenes . . . . 25 5 

|WiaXopo ete eaetaeeete ten ac 194 6 12 rufous or brown. 

BODO ei den Mee 5: = eons 4 

Melinnaea .... . 23 1 ~ ; 
iithores) 3. = 10 Fy 
SUE seh ae oi nb arene 366 20 12 

Excluding Ithomia °. 172 14 


234 BULLETIN; MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


TABLE 5, 


Showing the Variation in Color of the “ Middle Yellow” Band 
(Area V) of the fore wing in the Danaoid Heliconidae. 


fet re | 
2 ite he ee le 
184 [eal & | Shel se | 
GENERA. 3 | BS | ees) & | Zee ee | z 
s | #2 |gs6| 2 Fe) 23 § | 4 
S$ 8* (sm) g |#m|a>| ¢ | & 
aie joe | & jee |e | & | Rk 
Myoorea. «eS 5 | 
Iino ce eee, | 3 | 
PANGRIS) cates +e te ae 2 ibs | 
THT ses ee || 5 | | 
Athyatisy 4) 9. 1 | 1 | 
Olyras haath s 1 | 3 | 
Kutresis 2 | | 
FANTOLOPOS! | en Ge Gt: 1 | 1 | 
Dircenna .-. +. - 2 Sole ee 
Callithomia ... . | | 8 
Epithomia .... | | 1 i! 
Ceratinia 2 Gilead. 6 | 24 |} 
Sais . 5 | 
Scada nan 6 1 
Mechanitis ... .: | 4 \ eg | 19 
Napeogenes . =... | 2 3 Le Pack 4 6 
Ithomia 6| 6 12 | 128 | 24 8 14 | 20 
Aeria coy Tet, | 4 
Melinnea .... . 2 3 2 15 2 
THUDOVes us ve 5. 2 || | TO 1 2 
eke ue ae za |p —| 
Binitalimes ete ae ee |) AN B20 SO | 8 31 | 108 2| 24 
Excluding Ithomia . Ol SOue oid 36 11 23 94 | 2 4 


TABLE 6. 


Showing approximately the Number of Species in which the 
“Outer Yellow” (Area VI) of the fore wing in the Danaoid Heli- 
conidae appears as a separated Marking. It is usually fused with 
the “ Middle Yellow” Area. 


Wholly fused Partially fused 


Pe GENERA, with middle — with middle Separate, Absent. 
ol ban yellow, yellow. 
Lycorea 1 4 
ie Ttuna 2 1 
~~ Athesis 3 
: Thyridia 5 
Athyrtis 2 
~Olyras 1 3 
_ Eutresis neacce ad o) 
Aprotopos ... . 2 
Dircenna wae tab Ge 5? 
‘ Callithomia 1 2 
iy Epithomia ... . 1 1 
@eratinin =. Ss... % 22 16 about 3 about 
Sais eaten 2 3 
MCAS eS sins tin vi) canes 4 3 
Mechanitis ... . 1 20 3 
Napeogenes ... . 6 24 about 
Ninoy PG ee ye 200 about 
Aeria ined senate 4 
Melinnea . . . . . 1 17 6 
Aithorea! 2 2 as 10 
y OKA 2, about 250 about 80 | ~about 90° | perhaps 20 
» —_—--—-—. —— -—-——-$ —_ _ ————_————___ .. a - — = 


a i : ‘o a . 
eee ee ee 


236 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


TABLE 7. 


Showing the Degree of Development of the “ Outer Black” (Area 
VII) of the fore wing in the Danaoid Heliconidae. 


Well devel- 
| oped over a 


Reduced 
| to the outer 


GENERA, | large area of | margin of the 
thefore wing. fore wing. 
| 
Lycorea | 5 
Ituna 3 
Athesis 2 1 
Thyridia 5 
Athyrtis 2 
Olyras 3 1 
Eutresis 2 
Aprotopos 1 1 
Direcenna 5 7 
Callithomia 3 
Epithomia 2 
Ceratinia 28 13 
Sais . 2 
Scada 3 4 
Mechanitis 22 2 
Napeogenes 26 4 
Ithomia 161 54 
Aeria 4 
Melinaea 24 
Tithorea 10 
Total 306 95 


Present, but changed to 
another color, 


eee 


2 partly rufous. 
3 partly rufous. 


16 rufous or brown. 


1 partly rufous. 


22 partly rufous. 


ied in bibl ik hus ee be 
AYER: COLOR AN ) COLOR-Ps 


TABLE 8. 


f Showing the presence or absence of the “ Longitudinal Black 
= Stripe” (Area VIII) which runs parallel with the lower Edge of 
the fore wing in the Danaoid Heliconidae. 


2 Present and Much Whole area 
Y" - GENERA, well developed anion Absent, suffused with 
: as a stripe. : black. 
. Lycorea 5 
etn Ttuna 3 
Athesis 3 
' - Thyridia 5 
Athyrtis 2 
~Olyras . 3 1 
Eutresis 2 A 
Aprotopos 1 1 
Direenna . 7 3 2 
Callithomia 2 
Epithomia. smi 1 1 
Ceratinig, 3s. 0: 87 2 2 
Sais . a\-4 3 1 
RIGHU ieee aco ee ts bias 6 
Mechanitis .... 17 > 5 
Napeogenes . .. . 20 6 4 
LT, A ay 200 6 2 
PABLIG DS irae eae ot Tl 4 
(Melinaeis: i 5 35 14 5 
TMH OTEA © ees ue a 5 5 
POL any ert, 2, ns 338 24 24 


TABLE 9. 


Showing the Manner of Occurrence of the Marginal Spots (Area 
IX) of the fore wing in the Danaoid Heliconidae. 


With-| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 


Cea snot Spot. | spots.) spots.) spots.) spots.| spots.) spots.) spots.) spots. 


Lycorea 5 ¥ 
Ttuna 3 . z 
Athesis 3 

Thyridia . 4 1 

Athyrtis 1 1 

Olyras 3 1 

Eutresis 2 

Aprotopos 1 1 

Direenna . 11 1 > 
Callithomia . 1 2 

Epithomia 2 

Ceratinia 19 1 3 1 4| 12 1 

RIB sae 5 

Scada . . 4 1 1 1 

Mechanitis . ye 1 2 i 3 

Napeogenes . . 14 1 3 i 5 3 3 

Ithomia . . . | 187/. 2}] 14] 14 ti, Lei) 14 8 

ENOV Moms ce cst 4 

Melinaea . . . 138 1 2 4 3 1 

Tithorea ... 5 1 1 2 1 


Total 


TABLE 10. 


Showing the Color-Variations affecting the “ Inner Rufous” (Area 
X) of the hind wing in the Danaoid Heliconidae. 


‘ 2 tie ot oe 2 
& Be 8 18% | €. 
s 2 oe 5 8 = | oF 
.. GENERA. i Bee Se | ae eS =; 
D Se By I 
a ge“) 2 | gs 3 
ee) £2 ee 
a | oa & a | a 


Lycorea reer 
GUT ates x, cal. te 1 2 
Athesise.; 3 2. 2 1 
Thyridia oer 4 1 
Athyrtis eo 2 
; Olymagiog “Sas 3 Np i 
~ . Eutresis .. . 2 
Aprotopos. .. il 1 
~ Dircenna . . . | 8 2 2 - 
V. _ Callithomia . . 3 
i. Epithomia. . . 2 
7 Ceratinia . . . 23 3 6 6 1 2 
CEST OS ieee ae 5 
CRO Ate tr wanes 7 
Mechanitis . . 16 4 4 
Napeogenes . . q 6 6 6 5 
[thomia' « . -. 31 14 12 133 14 5 1 2 
Aeria th 4 
Melinaea . . . 19 4 1 
Tithorea . . . 6 4 
SROVAIOSS veer eee es 28 23 25 | 155 29 23 12 10 


TABLE 11. 


Showing the Variations of the “ Middle Black Stripe” (Area ae 
of the hind wing in the Danaoid Heliconidae, 


Fused with 
Absent. | the panel 


Present. Changed color, 


Lycorea 
Ttuna . 
Athesis 

Thyridia 
Athyrtis 


1 partially 


1 changed 
to translu- 
cent yellow ? 


Olyras . 


Eutresis 
Aprotopos 
Direenna . 
= Callithomia 
Epithomia 
: Ceratinia . 
Sais . 
Scada 
Mechanitis 
Napeogenes 
Ithomia 
Aeria 
: Melinaea 
7 Tithorea 


<i Total 


¢ 


i 


ay 


TABLE, 12. 


lh Ses at Sate F Ai ken AB anal 2 
MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTER 


7 


GENERA, 


Lycorea 
Ttuna 
Athesis 

f Thyridia 
> Athyrtis 

. Olyras . 
Eutresis 
Aprotopos 
Direenna . 
Callithomia 
Epithomia 
Ceratinia . 
7) Sais . 
Scada 
Mechanitis 
Napeogenes 
Ithomia 
Aeria 
Melinaea . 
Tithorea 


ne 


Total 


Excluding Ithomia 


nw 
ADSNeE NKR wD 


rey we oe) ree 
r= ed ete tl ts =e 
ae |an nFZ 
ae |gee| 2 | soe 
& |65 | & |&5 
1 2 
2 1 
4 aul 
1 
1 
4 3 3 
1 1 Wf 1 


Translucent 
yellow. 


Showing the Color-Variations of the “Outer Rufous” (Area XIT) 
of the hind wing in the Danaoid Heliconidae. 


t 


translucent. — 


White, 
somew! 


TABLE 13. 


Showing the presence or absence, and Color-Changes of the 
“Outer Black” (Area XIII) of the hind wing in the Danaoid 
Heliconidae. 


GENERA, Present. Absent. Changed color. 


Lycorea 

Ituna . 

Athesis ~ 

‘Thyridia 

Athyrtis 

Olyras . 

Eutresis 

Aprotopos 

Dircenna . ane ae 
Callithomin «3 . + 
Epithomia ‘ 
Ceratinia . 

Sais . 

ROada ici he cs sins 
Mechanitis .... 24 3 4 
aa Napeogenes ... . 30 

} HOM ters oT 210 1 11 changed to rufous or brown. 
Aeria Spee ee 4 

SiMelinasa . 9. » «=. 24 : 
‘Tithorea er 10 se 


—_ 


~ 
AOR NWNWNN ENO Ww 


LNT TALL se OSs SAR Rn aay 398 1 11 


TABLE 14. 


Showing the Number of the Marginal Spots of the hind wing in 
the Danaoid Heliconidae. 


2 rl ne leon 6 7 8 9 


GENERA, 


Lycorea 

Ttuna 2 

Athesis 

Thyridia . 4 

Athyrtis 1 

Olyras . 3 

-Eutresis 1 

Aprotopos ; 

Direcenna . . 10 ‘ 

Callithomia . 2 i 

Epithomia 1 1 

Ceratinia . 18 1 2 5 5 2 J 

Sais. . 4 1 

Seada . xh 3 1 1 2 

Mechanitis . . 18 1 1 2 2 

Napeogenes . . 21 1 1 1 5 1. 
ae Ithomia . . . | 164 8 6} 12 9 6 6 1 
a NC) IC Oe 4 

Melinaea. . . 19 1 3 il 

Mmithoves) < 4 2 2 2 . 
: GUN Ge peers alee es) 


TABLE 15. : 
Showing the Color-Variations of the “Inner Rufous” Area of the 
Sore wing in Heliconius and Kueides. 


Rufous. | Re?aish| venow. | ocher. | White, | Black. 


Heliconius . 


Eueides . 
Total 


Note: The costal edge of the fore wing is always black. 


TABLE 16. 


Showing the Variations affecting the “Inner Black” Area of the 
fore wing in Heliconius and Eueides. 


7 Black, Tridescent blue. Rufous, 
: . SS | 7 ' ; 7 
*{ Heliconius .... =. 85 26 q 
. INGEN) cil sae a GME 18 5 , 
5 EES Heo aaa GL ae 
HUSH epaeiaten a ees eee a 98 26 5 -. 
». Note: In 54 species of Heliconius the inner rufous is entirely suffused with black. 
“-s 
a TABLE 17. 
a Showing the Color-Variations of the “Inner Yellow” Area of the 4 
fore wing in Heliconius and Eueides, 
a» 
i a Trides- 
Rufous.| Red. Yellow, | Ocher. | White. | Black, cent 
blue, ; 
.: Heliconius . . 11 12 54 20 12 3 
Eueides. . . 6 12 
Total eee Ta 17 12 54 12 20 12 3 


at > E 7 = - a . - ; 


Give F. A oi ’ i= 
~_ af 
Hy 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. = 


TABLE 18. 


The “Middle Black” Area in the fore wing in Heliconius is 
present as a Black or Blue Marking in 99 Species and absent in 12. 
It is present as a Black Mark in all 18 Species of Eueides. 


TABLE 19. 


Showing the Color-Variation of the “ Middle Yellow ” Area of the 
fore wing in Heliconius and Eueides. 


Reddish 


Me Rufous. | yufous. | Yellow. | Ocher. | White. | Black. : 
Heliconius. 11 12 65 23 
Eueides . . 5 . 12 1 
Total | 16 12 65 12 24 
i} 


TABLE 20. 
Showing the Color-Variations of the “ Outer Yellow ’’ Area of the 


‘ fore wing in Heliconius and Eueides. 

Irides- 

Rufous, a Yellow. | Ocher, | White. | Black. tent 

ue. 

Heliconius .. 2 1 47 24 33 4 

Eueides . . . 6 Ml 11 
Motel. Gs 2 1 47 6 25 44 4 
TABLE 21. 


The “ Outer Black” Area of the fore wing in all the 111 species 
of Heliconius known to me is Black or Iridescent Blue. 
It is Black in all 18 Eueides. 


aS = eS 


TABLE 22. 


} Showing the Manner of Occurrénce of the Marginal Spots of the 
fore wing in Heliconius and Eueides. % ; 


With-| 4 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 o 
Spots.) spot. | spots.| spots.) spots.| spots.| spots.| spots,’ spots.) spots, 


Heliconius 
Eueides 


Total . 


TABLE 23. 


Showing the Variations affecting the “ Longitudinal Black Stripe” 
of the fore wing in Teliconius and Eueides. 


Absent (area suf- — 


Well developed as 
fused with rufous). 


Whole area suf- 
a black stripe, 


fused with black, 


Heliconius . 15 23 13 “ie 

% © Matder s,s tae 2 16 a 
: 1 oe 17 39 18 a 

- a 
: TABLE 24. q 
: Showing the Color-Variations: of the “ Inner Rufous” Area of the 
hind wing in Veliconius and Eueides. q 
- pete = peace 4 
ita a | 2a] ¢ sa | . | 85 | #8 | a8 | sae 4 

Heliconius Cd el 3 1 16} 26} 10] 1 5 
Eueides 15 2 1 | 
Road %2 . [ S) Pape) wow | et ao: a0| ell ae } 


TABLE 25. 


Showing the Variations of the “ Middle Black Stripe” of the hind 
wing in Heliconius and Eueides, 


bsent Absent ; 


Well devel- - Abse 
oped as a more chet LG lace taken | (place taken 
or less distinct, fused Wit yredorru- | by ocher ra 
stripe, ack). fous). color). } 
Heliconius ... . 47 59 5 of 
Eueides . . . . . 6 10 i 
. x a ss | eS 
eT ANOS Sah a gene 53 59 15 1 
% na 
TABLE 26. 


_ Showing the Color-Variations of the “Outer Rufous” Area of the 
hind wing in Veliconius and Eueides. 


Reddish Trides- 


Rufous. | rufous, | Yellow. | White, | Ocher, Black. cent 
blue. 
Heliconius .. 30 4 LOC” e. 49) 6 
EFueides . . . 17 } 1 
ACE ea nee ee 47 4 19 3 50 6 
TABLE 27. 
] The “ Outer Black ” Area of the hind wing is Black in 106 species 


of Heliconius, White in 4, and Yellow in 1. It is Black in all the 18 
species of Eueides known to me. 


TABLE. 28. 


sa Showing the Number of Species in each Genus of the Heliconidae 
examined, and also the Number known according to the Enumera- 
tion of Staudinger (8488). 


/ 2 Number of species 
GENERA. ont . ates ors known to Stattdinger 


a TY GONO Hn a. Pot ve eee 4 species and 1 var. | 4 species and 1 var. 
; Ituna... : 3 4 
=) Athesis 3 q 
li Thyridia . 5 4 
Athyrtis - 2 2 
Olyras 4 5 t 
Eutresis . 2 2 
Aprotopos 2 4 
Dircenna 12 20+ 
Callithomia . 3 8 
Epithomia 2 2 
Ceratinia 41 50+ 
Sais ; 5 4 
Seada . Se cA et 7 9 
INKOGHHDIGISi 2) sets 10 species, 14 var. 10 species, 13 var. 
Wapeogemes, 20 & uss = 30 ‘ 30 
Theva sn cot oth A aoe th i 212 230-+ 
Pa NCS) Cee lt iS eras Sue 4 4 
: INGLINAeH eeu: bene en Gs 24 25 
a. GUNES te Se AG 10 18 
= : : SS ee 
i Total of Danaoid Heliconidae. 400 453+ 
SliCOnIUSIss) se is 111 130 
WOES isc, Ghia os 18 24 
S00 eee nee icc Sana 529 607+ 
® 
i‘ 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 249 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Agassiz, A. 

D9. [Mechanism of the Flight of Lepidoptera.] Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. 

Hist., Vol. 6, p. 426-427, 
Bates, H. W. 

62, Contributions to an Insect Fauna of the Amazon Valley. Lepidoptera: 

Heliconidae. Trans. Linn. Soe,-London, Vol. 23, p. 495-566, pl. 55-56. 
Bates, H. W. 

63. On a Collection of Butterflies brought by Messrs. Salvin and Godman 
from Panama, with Remarks on geographical Distribution. Proc. Zool. 
Soe. London, p. 239-249, pl. 29. 

Bates, H. W. 

‘6465. New Species of Butterflies from Guatemala and Panama, collected 
by Osbert Salvin and F. Du Cane Godman, Esqs. Ent. Mo. Mag., Vol. 1, 
p. 1-6, 31-35, 55-59, 81-85, 113-116, 126-131, 161-164, 178-180, 202-205, 
[New Heliconidae, p. 31-35, 55-59.) 

Bateson, W. 

‘04. Materials for the Study of Variation treated with especial Regard to 
Discontinuity in the Origin of Species. London and New York, 16 +598 
pp. [p. 288-802.] 

Beddard, F. BE. 
92. Animal Coloration. London and New York, 8+ 288 pp., 4 pls. 
Belt, 'T. 

74. The Naturalistin Nicaragua. London, 403 pp. Second edition, London, 

1888, 33 +- 403 pp. 
Bemmelen, J. I’, van. 

89. Ueber die Entwicklung der Farben und Adern auf den Schmetterlings- 
fliigeln. ‘Tijdschrift der Nederlandische Dierkundige Vereeniging, Ser. 2, 
Deel 2, p. 235-247. 

Blackiston, 'T., and Alexander, T’. 

84. Protection by Mimiery — A Problem in Mathematical Zoology. Nature, 

Vol. 29, p. 405-406, 
Burgess, B. 

’80. Contributions to the Anatomy of the Milk-weed Butterfly Danais arehip- 

pus (Fabr.). Anniversary Mem. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 1880, 16 pp., 2 pls. 
Burmeister, H,. 

‘78. Lépidoptéres. Description Physique dela République Argentine, Tome 

5, 524 pp., 24 pls. [p.21-28.] 


250 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


Butler, A. G, 

65. Description of six new Species of Diurnal Lepidoptera in the British 

Museum Collection. Proce. Zool. Soc. London, 1865, p. 480-434, pl. 25. 
Butler, A. G. 

769. Remarks upon certain Caterpillars, ete., which are unpalatable to their 
enemies. ‘Trans. Ent. Soc. London, 1869, p. 27-29. [Feeding habits of 
birds; warning coloration. | 

Butler, A. G. 
69", Descriptions of several new Species of Nymphalidian Rhopalocera. 
Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 4, Vol. 3, p. 17-21, pl. 9. [New Heliconidae. ] 
Butler, A. G. 
69-74. Lepidoptera Exotica. London, 190 pp., 64 pls. [New Heliconidae. ] 
Butler, A. G. 

‘77. List of Lepidoptera recently collected by Mr. Walter Davis in Peru, 
with Descriptions of a new Genus and several new Species. Ann. Mag. 
Nat. Hist., Ser. 4, Vol. 20, p. 117-129. 

Chapman, 'T. A. . 
88. On Melanism in Lepidoptera. Ent. Mo. Mag., Vol. 25, p. 40. 
Coste, F. H. P. 

"00-91. Contributions to the Chemistry of Insect Colours. Entomologist, 
Vol. 23, p. 128-132, 155-159, 181-187, 217-228, 247-252, 283-287, 309-314, 
338-3438, 370-374; Vol. 24, p. 9-15, 37-40, 53-60, 86-91, 114-119, 132-139, 
163-170, 186-192, 206-211. See also Nature, Vol. 45, p. 513-517, 541-542, 605. 

Cramer, P. 

177982. Uitlandische Kapellen. Amsterdam, 4 Vols., 400 pls. 
Darwin, C. 

‘71. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London, 2 Vols. 
Dimmock, G. 

83. The Scales of Coleoptera. Psyche, Vol. 4, p. 3-11, 23-27, 43-47, 63-71. 
Distant, W. L. 

*82—’86. Rhopalocera Malayana. London, 16+ 481 pp., 44pls. [p. 33; 129; 
289; 469.] 

Dixey, F. A. 

00. On the phylogenetic Significance of the Wing-markings in certain 
Genera of the Nymphalidae. Trans. Ent. Soe. London, 1890, p, 89-129, 
pl. 1-8. 

Druce, H. 

‘76. List of the Butterflies of Perp, with Descriptions of new Species. Proc. 

Zool. Soc. London, 1876, p. 205-250, pl. 17-18. 
Eimer, G. H. T. 

89. Die Artbildung und Verwandtschaft bei den Schmetterlingen. Jena; 

12 + 243 pp., 4 Taf. 
Felder, C. und R. 

6467. Rhopalocera. Reise Osterreichischen Fregatte Novara. Wien, 

6 +548 pp., 140 Taf. [New Heliconidae.] 
Godman, F. D., and Salvin, O. 

7986. Lepidoptera-Rhopalocera. Vol. 1. Biologia Centrali-Americana. 

Insecta. {London], 487 pp., 47 pls. [New Heliconidae.] 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. Zo 


Godman, F. D., and Salvin, 0. 

80. A List of Diurnal Lepidoptera collected in the Sierra Nevada of Santa 
Marta, Colombia, and the Vicinity. Trans. Ent, Soc. London, 1880, p. 119- 
182, pl. 8-4. [New Heliconidae. } 

Griffiths, A. B. 

‘02. Recherches sur les Couleurs de quelques Insectes. Comptes Rendus 

Acad. Sci. Paris, Tome 115, p. 958-959. 
Haase, EF. 

‘93. Untersuchungen tiber die Mimiery auf Grundlage eines nattirlichen 
Systems der Papilioniden. Bibliotheca Zoologica, Heft 8, Theil 1, 120 pp., 
6 Taf. fp. 14-15.] 

Haase, I. 

93", Untersuchungen tiber die Mimicry auf Grundlage eines natiirlichen 
Systems der Papilioniden, Bibliotheca Zoologica, Heft 8, Theil 2, 161 pp., 
8 Taf. English translation by C. M. Child. Stuttgart, 1896, 154 pp., 8 pls. 

Hewitson, W. C. 

‘54. Descriptions of some new Species of Butterflies from South America. 
Trans. Ent. Soc, London, New Ser., Vol. 2, p. 245-248, pl. 22-23. [New 
species of Heliconidae.] 

Hewitson, W. C. 

56-76, Illustrations of new Species of Exotic Butterflies. London, 5 Vols., 

Plates. 
Higgins, H. H. 

*68. On the Colour-Patternsin Butterflies. Quart. Journ. Sci., Vol. 5, p. 323- 

329, 1 pl. 
Hopkins, I’. G. 
89. Uric Acid Derivatives functioning as Pigments in Butterflies. Proc. 
Chem. Soc. London, 1889, p. 117, Also Nature, Vol. 40, p. 335. 
Hopkins, I’. G. 
91. Pigment in Yellow Butterflies. Nature, Vol. 45, p. 197. 
Hopkins, F. G. 

‘04. The Pigments of the Pieridae. A Contribution to the Study of Exere- 
tory Substances which function in Ornament. Proce. Roy. Soe. London, 
Vol. 57, p. 5-6. 

Hopkins, F. G. 

‘96, The Pigments of the Pieridae: A Contribution to the Study of Exere- 
tory Substances which function in Ornament. Philos. Trans. gov. Soc. 
London, Vol. 186, p. 661-682. 

Hiibner, J. 

06—25, Sammlung exotischer Schmetterlinge. Augsburg, 5 Bde., Tafeln. 
Humboldt, A. yon, et Bonpland, A. 

33. Recueil d’Observations de Zoologie, Latreille. Paris. 
Keeler, C. A. an 

98. Evolution of the Colors of North American Land Birds. Occas. Papers 
Cal. Acad, Sci., Vol. 8, 12 +361 pp., 19 pls. 

Kellogg, V. L. 

04. The ‘Taxonomic Value of the Scales of the Lepidoptera. Kansas Uniy. 

Quart., Vol. 3, p. 45-89, pl. 9-10. 


252 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. 


Kirby, W.F. + 

71-77. A synonymic Catalogue of Diurnal Lepidoptera. London, 5+ 690 

pp. Supplement. London, p. 691-883. 
Leydig, F. 

55. Zum feineren Bau der Arthropoden. Miiller’s Archiv, Jahrg. 1855 

p. 376-380, Taf. 15-18. 
Mayer, A. G. 

96. The Development of the Wing Scales and their Pigment in Butterflies 

and Moths. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zo6l. Hary. Coll., Vol. 29, p. 209-236, 7 pls. 
Ménétriés, EB. 

63. Descriptions des nouvelles Espéces de Lépidoptéres. St. Petersbourg. 

[New Heliconidae.} 
Merrifield, F. 
04. Temperature Experiments in 1893 on several Species of Vanessa and 
other Lepidoptera. ‘Trans. Ent. Soe. London, 1894, p. 425-438, pl. 9. 
Moore, F. 
90-96. Lepidoptera Indica, London, 2 Vols., 190 pls. 
Miiller, F. 

78. Notes on Brazilian Entomology. Trans. Ent. Soc. London, 1878, p. 211— 

223. [Odors emitted by Butterflies and Moths. } 
Miiller, F’. 

79, Ituna und Thyridia. Ein merkwiirdiges Beispiel von Mimicry bei 
Schmetterlingen. Kosmos, Bd. 5, p. 100-108, fig. 1-4. English translation 
by Raphael Meldola. ‘Trans. Ent. Soc. London, 1879, p. 20-29 Proc., fig. 1-4. 

Miiller, W. 

°86. Stidamerikanische Nymphalidenraupen. Versuch eines natiirlichen 
Systems der Nymphaliden. Zool. Jahrbiicher, Bd. 1, p. 417-678, Taf. 
12-15. 

Poulton, E. B. 

85. The essential Nature of the Colouring of Phytophagous Larvae (and 
their Pupae); with an Account of some Experiments upon the Relation 
between the Colour of such Larvae and their Food-plant. Proc. Roy. Soc. 
London, Vol. 38, p. 269-315. 

Poulton, BE. B. 

’87. The experimental Proof of the Protective Value of Colour and Markings 
in Insects in Reference to their Vertebrate Enemies. Proc. Zool. Soc. 
London, 1887, p. 191-274. 

Poulton, EB. B. 

90, The Colours of Animals. International Sci. Series, 67. New York, 

13 + 360 pp. 
Poulton, E. B. 

93. ‘The experimental Proof that the Colours of certain Lepidopterous 
Larvae are largely due to modified Plant Pigments derived from Food, 
Proc. Roy. Soe. London, 1893, p. 417-430, pl. 3-4. 

Ridgway, R. 
84. A Nomenclature of Colors for Naturalists. Boston, 129 pp., 17 pls. 
Rippon, R. H. F. 

89-93. Icones Ornithopterorum: A Monograph of the Rhopalocerous Genus 

Ornithoptera, or Bird-wing Butterflies. London, parts 1-5, Plates. 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 253 


Schiffer, C. 

89. Beitriige zur Histologie der Insekten. Zool. Jahrbiicher, Morph. Abth., 

Bd. 8, p. 611-652, ‘Tat. 29-30. [ Reference, p. 647-652. ] 
Schatz, E., und Rober, J. 

"85-92. Die Familien und Gattungen der Tagfalter. (Exotische Schmetter- 

linge von Staudinger und Schatz.) Firth, 2. Theil, 2-+- 284 pp., 50 Taf. 
Scudder, 8. H. 

788-89. ‘The Butterflies of the Hastern United States and Canada with special 

Reference to New England. Cambridge, 3_Vols., 24 -- 1958 pp., 89 pls. 
Seitz, A. 
89. Lepidopterologische Studien im Ausland. Zool. Jahrbiicher, Syst. Abth., 
Bad. 4, 771-779, 905-924. 
Semper, G. 
86-92. Die Schmetterlinge der Philippinischen Inseln. Wiesbaden, 2 Bde. 
Snellen, P. C. 'T., en Leeuwen, J. van, Jr. 

87. Bijdrage tot de Kennis der Lepidoptera yan het Hiland Curacao. 

Tijdsch. voor Ent., Deel 30, p. 9-66, pl. 1-5. 
South, R. 

89. Notes on some Aberrations in the Genus Vanessa. Entomologist, 

Vol. 22, p. 217-221, pl. 8. [Fig. 7.] 
Srnka, A. 

84. Kine neue Athyrtis. Lepidoptera: Fam. Heliconidae. Berlin. Ent. 

Zeitschr., Bd. 28, p. 163-165, 
Sruka, A. 

85, Neue Siidamerikanische Danaidae und Heliconidae. Berlin. Ent. 

Zeitschr., Bd. 29, p. 121-130, Taf. 1. 
Staudinger, O. 

82. On three new and interesting Species of Rhopalocera. Proce. Zool. Soe. 

London, 1882, p. 396-398, pl. 24. [New Heliconidae. ] 
Staudinger, O. 

"8488. Exotische Tagfalter. (Ixotische Schmetterlinge von Staudinger 

und Schatz.) Fiirth, 1. Theil, 333 pp. 100 Taf. [New Heliconidae.] 
Urech, F. 

91. Beobachtungen tiber die verschiedenen Schuppenfarben und die zeit- 
liche Suecession ihres Auftretens (Farbenfelderung) auf den Puppen- 
fliigelchen yon Vanessa urticae und io. Zool. Anzeiger, Jahrg. 14, p. 466— 
473. 

Urech, F. 

92. Uber Higenschaften der Schuppenpigmente einiger Lepidopteren- 

Species. Zool. Anzeiger, Jahrg. 15, p. 299-306. 
Urech, F. 

93. Beitriige zur Kenntniss der Farbe von Insektenschuppen. Zeitschy., f. 
wiss. Zool., Bd. 57, p. 806-384. 

Van Bemmelen. See Bemmelen, J. F. van. 
Wallace, A. R. 

67. [Theory of Warning Coloration.] Trans. Ent, Soc. London, Ser. 3, 

Vol. 5, p. 80-81, Proce. 
Wallace, A. R. 
89. Darwinism, London and New York, 16+ 494 pp. [p. 288-267. ] 


Peet ae Lada, otitis Yorkshire Union, pt. 5p. 113-14 
Of. Nature, Vol. 31, p. Be: ae bt 


| Watkins, W 
91. ‘Ountiivo stars trojana, Sannieien RG seOOLOE EY: Vol. 24, p. 178-179, he 


pl. 4. 
~ Weismann, Ne “ey 
°82. Studies in the Theory of Descent. ‘Translated and edited by Baten. sm 
_ _Meldola. London, 2 Vols., 28 +729 pp., 8 pls. [p. 1-158.] Yn 
Weymer, G. 
°75. Exotische Lepidopteren. Stettiner Ent. Zeit. Jahrg. 36, p. 368-385, 
‘Taf. 1-2. 
Weymer, G. 
°84. Exotische Lepidopteren. II. Stettiner Ent. Zeit., Jahrg. 45, p. 7-28, — 
Taf. 1-2. : 


MAYER: COLOR AND COLOR-PATTERNS. 255 


TABLE OF CONTENTS. 


PART A. 
GENERAL PueNomMENA or Coror ix Leprpoprera, 


I. Crhassirication or Conors, 


PAGE 

(1) Pigmental Colors 4 ; : ’ 5 : d : ; 2 169 
(2) Structural Colors : : ; : : : . : : " 170 
(3) Combination Colors. 4 : ; F : 171 
(4) Quantitative Determination of Figmental Colors . : ; ; 172 
(5) Spectrum Analysis of Colors of Lepidoptera — . : : é : 178 
(6) Summary of Results ; : : : : : : : : 174 


Il, Tue rssentiAn Nature or PiGMENTAL Conor IN LEPIDOPTERA. 


(1) Pigments of Larvae 
(2) Pigments of Imagines 


a) 
—I =J 
oe 


III. DeveLopment OF THE VARIOUS CoLors IN THE PUPAL WINGs. 


(1) Historical Account of previous Researches. 5 176 
(2) Development of Color in the Pupal Wings of Callosamia promiethee 178 
(8) Development of Color in the Pupal Wings of Danais plexippus 


(archippus) . ; : ; ‘ 3 , ; : é : 180 

IV. Tue Laws wich GoverRN Tor Conor—Parrerns or ButrrerrLies AND 
Morus. 

(1) Historical Account of previous Researches i : ‘ ; : 181 
(2) Laws of Color-Patterns . : : : : 183 
(3) Detailed Discussion of the Laws of Color- Patterns : : : ; 185 
(4) Origin of Color-Variations : : , ; : ; , 189 

Bibliography of Color- Apennaniou: ; ‘ ‘ ‘ 5 190 
(5) Climate and Melanism : : p : ; 190 
(6) Relation between Climate and Galena of Papilios : i : : 191 


V. Tur Causrks wich HAVE LED TO THE DEVELOPMENT AND PRESERVATION 
or THE ScALEs or THE LEPIDOPTERA, 


(1) Experiments and Theory . 0 : : ‘ : : : : 192 
(2) Summary of Conclusions . : ; - : j y t 197 
PART B. 


CoLon—VARIATIONS IN THE HmLiconIpAr. 
I. Generar Causes WHICH DETERMINE COLORATION IN THE HELICONIDAR. 


Il. Mrruops rursueD IN STUDYING THE CoLoR—PATTERNS OF THE 
HELICONIDAR. 


(1) The Two ‘Types of Coloration in the Danaoid Heliconidae 204 
(2) Detailed Description of the Melinaea ‘Type of Coloration 205 


256 BULLETIN: MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY, 


III. Generar Discussion or tHE CoLor—PATTERNS AND OF Mimicry IN 
tHe GENERA Hexticonius AND EvueIpes. 


(1) The Four Color-Types in the Genus Heliconius . . a 208 
(2) Mimiery between the genus Heliconius and the Danaoid 

Group F 3 : f 209 
(8) The Three Color. types't in iio Genus Musides : ; ; 210 
(4) Detailed Discussion of Plates 5-8 ; ; ; : F 210 


IV. Generar Discussion or tHe Conor—Parrerns And or Mimicry 
AMONG THE Danaorp HeLicontpanr. 


(1) The Origin of the two Types of Coloration ; : ; 214 
(2) Mimiery among the Danaoid Heliconidae . : 4 : 216 


V. Quantitative DETERMINATION OF THE VARIATIONS OF THE CHAR— 
ACTERISTIC Winc-MARKINGS IN THE ACRAEOID AND DaNaorp 
HeLiconripar. 


(1) Variations of the ‘Inner Rufous” Areas of the Fore and 


Hind Wings. ; ; 2 ; ; 2 : 217 
(2) The “ Inner Black” Spot . : ; 218 
(3) Variations of the ‘‘Inner Yellow”’ and « Middle Yellow 2 

Areas : : 219 


(4) Variations of the “ Middle Black ¥ , Mark of the Fére Wing 221 
(5) Variations of the “Outer Yellow” Area of the Fore Wing 221 
(6) The Relative Permanency of the Black Areas upon the Fore 


and Hind Wings ; ; ; ; 222 
(7) The “ Middle Black Stripe ” of he Hind Wing : ; 222 
(8) Variations of the Marginal Spots of the Fore Wing. = 223 
(9) The Marginal Spots of the Hind Wing ; ; : : 223 


VI. Comparison oF THE CoLOR—VARIATIONS OF THE PAPILIOS OF 
Soutn AMBPRICA WITH THOSE OF THE HELICONIDAR. 


PART C. 
GENERAL SUMMARY OF RESULTS BELIEVED TO BE NEW TO SCIENCE, 


Tables ; : : ; : : : : : : ; ; F 230 
Bibliography . i : : ; ; : ; ; ¥ A : 249 
Explanation of Plates 


PLATE I. 


ABBREVIATIONS. 


B. Back surface covered with wings. _O. Orifice for admission of light. 
F. Front surface covered with wings. 8S. Spectroscope. 
Arrow indicates directions of rays of light. 


Fig. 1. Perspective view of spectroscopic apparatus used in determining the 
composition of the colors of Lepidoptera. 

Fig. 2. Horizontal section of same. See p. 175. 

Fig. 3. Pendulum used in determination of the frictional resistance between 
the air and the wings of Lepidoptera. See p. 193. 

Figs. 4,5. Diagrams to illustrate Keeler’s method of projection, as applied to 
Lepidoptera. See p. 207. 


“MAYER= COLOR AND COLOR PATTERNS. PLATE. 1. 


ol la 


a= 
L 


Ls 


AGM del B Meisel lith Boston 


Butt.Mus Comp. ZOOL.VOL. XXX. 


Mayer, — Color and Color-Patterns, 


PLATE 2. 


Diagrams to illustrate the laws which govern the Color- Patterns of Lepidoptera. 


Fig. 6. Euthalia bellata (W. L. Distant, ‘82-86, Plate 43, Fig. 12). Illustrates 
the law of bilaterality of spots. See p, 185. 

Zethera musa (G. Semper, *86—92, Taf. 7, Fig. 10). Bilaterality of 
double spots. See p. 183. 

Fig. 8. Eye-spots in Morpho. See p. 182, 183. 

Fig. 9. Parthenos gambrisius (W. L. Distant, ’82-’86, Plate 11, Fig.7). A series 
of complex spots, each one being similar to the rest, and bilaterally 
symmetrical. 

Figs. 10, 11. Ornithoptera urvillana and O. priamus (R. H. F. Ripon, ’89-"95). 
Spots within spots, all being bilaterally symmetrical. 

Figs. 12, 13. Hestia jasonia and H. leuconoe. Axis of lateral symmetry 
(H, 1), for spots passes through center of interspace. H. jasonia 
(F. Moore, °90-96, Plate 3, Fig. 1). H. leuconoe (G. Semper, 
86-92, Taf. 1, Fig. 3). 

Fig. 14. Papilio emalthion, to illustrate fusion of two rows of spots. 

Fig. 15. Ornithoptera trojana, an apparent exception to the law of bilaterality. 
See p. 187. 

Fig. 16. Limenitis proserpina (S. H. Scudder, ’88—89, Plate 2, Fig. 9), showing 
fusion of two rows of differently colored spots. See p. 187. 

Fig. 17. Saturnia spini, false eye-spot. See p. 187. 

Fig. 18. Cases of degeneration of bands of color. See p. 184. 

Fig. 19. Missanga patina (IF. Moore, 9096, Plate 72, Fig. 2°). Exceptional 
form of eye-spot. See foot note p. 186. 

Figs. 20-28. Hypothetical conditions of coloration, not found in nature, being 
contrary to the laws of color-pattern. See p. 188. 


= 
og 


MayYER=- GOLOR AND GOLOR PATTERNS. PLATE. 2. 


AGM del B Meisel Iith, Boston 


But..Mus. Comp, ZOOL.VOL. XXX. 


MAver. — Color and Color-Patterns, 


PLATE 53. 


To illustrate color-development in Callosamia promethea and Danais plexippus. 


Fig. 24. Enlarged view of pupal wing of C. promethea in the ‘‘ white stage.” 
See p. 178. 

Fig. 25. Seale from wing of C. promethea in white stage of color-development, 
showing the total absence of pigment in the scale. See p. 178. 

Fig. 26. Scale from light drab-colored area of mature wing of C. promethea, 

Figs. 27, 36, and 33. Successive stages in the formation of color in pupal hind 

; wing of C. promethea. 

Figs. 28, 87-40. Successive stages in the formation of color in the pupal fore 
wing of 2 C. promethea. See p, 179, 180, 

Figs. 29, 80-35. Successive stages in the formation of color in the pupal wings 
of g C. promethea. (Figs. 29, 30-33, 35 fore wing; Fig. 34 hind 
wing.) See p. 179, 180. 

Figs. 34 and 41. Pupal hind wings of C. promethea, respectively mature 2 
and @. 

Figs. 42-45. Successive stages in the color-development of D. plexippus. See 
p. 180-181. 


conidae. 


ITT, ete 
Fig. 46. 


Fig. 47. 


Fig. 48. 
Fig. 49. 
Fig. 50. 
Fig. 51. 
Fig. 62. 


” Fig. 63. 


Fig. 54. 
Fig. 55. 
Fig. 56. 
Fig. 57. 
Fig. 58. 
Fig. 59. 


Fig, 60. 


PLATE 4. 


Systematic analysis of the characteristic markings upon the wings of the Heli- 
Homologous markings are designated by the same numerals, I, 7; 


Lycorea ceres; an example of the “Melinaea type” of coloration. ’ 


See p. 205. 


Thyridia psidii; an example of the “ Ithomia type” of ‘Galsnatione 


See p. 206 and Plate 7, Fig. 79. 
Melinaea paraiya. 
Ceratinia ninonia. 
Heliconius antiochus. 
Napeogenes duessa. 
Ithomia sao. 

Melinaea gazoria. 
Ithomia nise. 
Mechanitis polymnia. 
Eueides cleobaea. 
Tithorea furia var. 
Heliconius eucrate. 
Heliconius melpomene. 
Heliconius erato. 


MAYER= GOLOR AND COLOR PATTERNS. PLATE. 4, 


vy VIM _—__ 
Vil a ~ 


AGM. del B Meisel lith. Boston 
Butyt.Mus. Comp. ZOOL. VOL. XXX. 


= ee”) OS — ae = |) 


ns a7 i , —s eo 


et PLATE 5. 
r ba . > ' { t . cw 
Color-patterns of the Antiochus and Erato groups of the Heliconidae projected 
by Keeler’s method. See p. 207. 


a Figs. 61, 62. Heliconius sara and H. antiochus, to show variation of yellow to 
white. See p. 210, and Vig. 50, Plate 4. 
' Fig. 63. H. galanthus, showing development of white. 
a) Vig. 64, H. charitonia, rows of double spots. 
Vig. 65. H. phyllis, close relation between yellow and red. 
ain Fig. 66. H. ricini. 
i Awis Figs. 67, 68. H. erato; two color-types. 
a Fig. 69. H. claudia; an example of the Sylvanus group. 


MAYER - COLOR AND COLOR PATTERNS PLATE. 5, 
HIND WING 


oe a Il It W V Vi Vil Vill 


Heliconius sara 


Codt 


Mt antiochis 
Linn, 

Hh galant/iats 
hates 


UL charithonia 


Linn 


H phyllis Fabr. 


Ff ric Lint 


ne ee ee ee ee 


Hierato Linn 


' phos oe ee ee 


claudia 


yy , 
Godi.d Sadly. 


A.G.M. del B Meisel lith, Boston 


BuLt.Mus, Comp ZoouVOL. XXX 


- As . hb ' = 
i 4 ih £ So 7 ~~ 
“| Ae 
Ss ia 
=z 
— ee 
i & ‘ - 
: ms 
7 a4 
Vs 
3 rm 
>» . 
a = 
. = 
— 
¢ i 
’ 
- ’ Fr = ‘ pra’ 7 
- ae ant om we Ls 
= = o - rer 
v7 & mrt oa 7 - 
c ” tay .< £3 _ 
’ - S| eas Lo —. ‘ 
- ~ = ip 
“ 60> ieee 


BEN a 


MAYER, — Color and Color-Patterns. 


PLATE 6. 


Color-patterns of the Melpomene group of Heliconius and of the genus 
Bueides. 


Fig. 70. H. melpomene, the type of the Melpomene group. See p. 212, and 
Fig. 59, Plate 4. 

Fig. 71. H. melpomene var. callicopis, showing the breaking up of the red 
area of the primaries. 

Fig. 72. H. melpomene var. cybele; the fore wing has assumed a color-pattern 

which recalls the ‘‘Melinaea type” of coloration found in the 

Danaoid Heliconidae. 

H. thelxiope, derived phylogenetically from H. melpomene, and 

showing a rather close approach to the “ Melinaea type” of color- 

ation. “See p. 212. 

Fig. 74. H. vesta. 

Fig. 75. Enueides thales g ; represented to show the close resemblance of its 
color-pattern to H. vesta. See p. 212. 

Figs. 76,77. E. mereaui and E. aliphera. E. mereaui is intermediate in color- 
pattern between E. thales and E. aliphera. 

Fig. 78. Eueides cleobaea, to show the close approach of this insect to the 
‘“Melinaea type” of coloration. 


= 
8 

~I 

3 


MAYER-= GOLOR AND GOLOR PATTERNS PLATE. 6. 


HIND WING FORE WING 
frm rf vin vw V Vow ww 1 ah vv 


Heliconius 


melpomene Linn 


UH melpornene var: 


callycopis Gam 


H melpomene var: 


wvbhele Cram 


4. Theixiope 
thibry. é 


H.vesta Camu 


Eueides thates 


(ram.ds 


E. mereatt 


Thibr, 


£. aliphera 


(rodé 


E.cleobaea 


Hibn 


AGM del B Meisel lth Bost 


Oe ee 


PLATE 7. 


Intended to show some types of coloration which are found in the Danaoid 
Heliconidae, and also the remarkable individual variation in Mechanitis isthmia. 


Fig. 79. 
Fig. 80. 


Fig. 81. 
Fig. 82. 


Fig. 83. 


Thyridia psidii, an example of the “Ithomia” type of coloration. 
See p. 213, and Plate 4, Fig. 47. 

Napeogenes cyrianassa, showing semi-translucent condition of wings. 
See p. 213. 

Ceratinia vallonia. 

Melinaea parallelis ; albinism of spots on primaries ; black band of hind 
wing broken in the middle. See p. 188, 213. 

Ceratinia leucania, which probably mimics M. parallelis. | 


Figs. 84-87. Mechanitis isthmia, showing remarkable individual variation in 


the black stripe of the hind wings, and also in the “inner yellow” 
spot of the fore wings. See p. 184, 213. 


Thyridta 


psidii Linn 


Napeogenes 
WVITLANASSA 


Doubl. & Hen 


Coratinia 


vallonia Hew 


MNelinacaparallelis 


Bud. 


Ceralinialeucania 


D 
Dales 


Mechanitis 


istiunia Bales 


Mechanitis 


isthinia Bates 


Mechanilis 


isthimia bale. 


VYechanitis 


isthuinia Bales 


Mayer. — Color and Color-Patterns. 


PLATE 8. 


Illustrates the mimicry between members of the “ Sylvanus” group of the genus 
Heliconius and various Melinaeas, etc. 


Fig. 88. Heliconius eucoma, an example of the “Sylvanus” type of coloration 
in genus Heliconius. See p. 214. 

Figs. 89,90. Heliconius dryalus and Melinaea paraiya; close resemblance of 
their color-patterns. See p. 214. 

Figs. 91, 92, 93,94. Respectively Heliconius eucrate, Melinaea thera, Eueides 
dianasa, and Mechanitis polymnia; showing close resemblance 
between color-patterns. See p. 214. 

Figs. 95, 96. Heliconius sylvana and Melinaea egina; these two forms are said 
by Bates to mimic each other. See p. 214. 


ee 


MAYER 


GOLOR AND GOLOR PATTERNS PLATE. 8. 
HIND WING 


FORE WING 
If i im WV V WWI vu : 


I Ws W 


Vo VI 


Heliconiies 


eucoma tliibn 


SD. 


Heliconius 


aryadius Hopth 


IO. 


Melinaca 


paraiva Leak 


Heliconits 


Ciucrade tMiibr 


Velinaca 


thera tela. 


Eueides dianasa 


Lib 


Mechanitis 


polviiua Linn 


Heliconttis 


svivana Cram 


YO 


Melinaea 


Cy lita Cram 


MAYER. — Color and Color-Patterns. 


PLATE 9. 


Diagrams to illustrate color-variations. 

The various colors are laid off at definite intervals along the axis of abscissae, 
and the ordinates represent the number of species which exhibit the various 
colors. 


Fig. 97. Represents the color-variations of the “inner rufous” area of the fore 
and hind wings inthe Danaoid Heliconidae. The full line represents 
the variations of the fore wing. ‘The dotted line those of the hind 
wing. The closeness of these two lines shows the intimate relations 
between the color-variations of the “inner rufous” areas upon fore 
and hind wing. See p. 218. 

Fig. 98. ‘The full line represents color-variations of “inner yellow ” spot of fore 
wings in Danaoid Heliconidae. ‘The dotted line represents same for 
“middle yellow.” It is apparent that the*“inner yellow” is more 
variable than the *‘ outer yellow,” and also that the variations of 
both are quite similar to those of the ‘inner rufous.” See p. 219. 

Fig. 99. Color-variations of “inner rufous” areas of Acraeoid Heliconidae. 
The full line represents the fore wing and the dotted line the hind 
wing. See p. 218. 


an g 
: & 
ia = 
& = 
< Ei 
4 = 
Ay ta 
naauo 

MO173A ania PS 

ra 

> 

=) 

MO173A ie) 

INZOMSNWEL yovie > 

= 

70 

MOTIIA o 

ATLHSIIS Eat 

ANBDT1SNYEL 2LIHM 9: 

= 

fo) 

oO 

auHDO Z 

4 

snoanu a 

xULHOIS 4 

01734 2 


ANJIMSNVEL — 


cm ae oe 


SLE 


Mayer COLOR AND CoLoR PATTERNS 


MAyYeEr. —Color and Color-Patterns. 


Fig. 100. 


Fig. 101. 


Fig. 102. 


PLATE 109. 


Color-variations of “inner yellow” spots on fore wings of Acraeoid 
Heliconidae. The full line represents the “ inner yellow,” the dotted 
line the “ middle yellow.” See p. 221. 

Variations of marginal spots upon fore wing in Danaoid Heliconidae. 
These spots tend to appear either as 2 or 3, or as 6 or 7 spots. See 
p. 223. 

Variations of marginal spots of hind wings in Danaoid Heliconidae. 
These spots tend to appear either as 4 or as 5 spots. See p. 223. 


MayeR- GOLOR AND CoLoR PATTERNS. PLate.. 10. 


ee He ETT 
Ee aa 
EEE ee eee EE Ea 
HE ERE gee 

Vee aaa same moma 
r ae HEU ete ee EE a ee 


40 100. 


Se ee AU acl Ca 


TL 


RED 
RUFOUS 
YELLOW 
OCHRE 
WHITE 
BLACK 
BLUE 
IRIDESCENCE 


ee 
ee 
aaa - ante 
a aa | 
es . a 


THE HBHHL a Ht el H f 


30 + 


20 101. 


102, 


AGM det B Meisel lith,fosten, 
Butt.Mus. Comp ZOOL.VoL. XXX. 


are in preparation: — 


; Reports on the Results of Dredging Operations in 1877, 1878, 1879, and 1880, in charge of 
_ ANDER AGAssiz, by the U. S. Coast Survey Steamer “ Blake,” as follows: — 
A. MILNE-EDWARDS. Crustacea of the “ Blake.” 
E, EHLERS, The Annelids of the « Blake.” 
GC. HARTLAUB. The Comatule of the Blake,” with 15 Plates, . 
H. LUDWIG. The Genus Pentacrinus. os hone 
A, E. VERRILL, The Alcyonaria of the “ Blake.” - 


Illustrations of North American MARINE INVERTEBRATES, from Drawings by Burk- — 
HARDT, SONREL, and A. AGAssiz, prepared under the Direction of L, AGASSIZ. 


A. AGASSIZ, A Visit to the Great Barrier Reef of Australia. 
LOUIS CABOT. Immature State of the Odonata, Part 1Y, 

E. L. MARK, Studies on Lepidosteus, continued. . 

se On Arachnactis, AES 

R. T. HILL. On the Geology of the Isthmus of Panama, a". ; 

am On the Geology of Jamaica. S 

CHARLES WACHSMU'IEH and FRANK SPRINGER, The North American Fossil Crinoi- 


_ dea Camerata, With an Atlas of 88 Plates. Will be issued as Vols. XX. and XXI, of -. a 
the Memoirs. 


f 


as follows: — 


W. WHITNEY. ‘lhe Histology of ''hyone. 
YD. GLEE, The Suprarenals in Amphibia, 


Contributions from the GEOLOGICAL I, 


Contributions from the ZOOLOGICAL LABORATORY, in charge of Professor BE, L. Marx, 


ABORATORY, in charge of Professor N.S. Sua LER. 


Studies from the NEWPORT MARINE LAB 
AGASSIZ, as follows; — 


ORATORY, communicated by ALEXANDER 


A. AGASSIZ and A.G. MAYER. The Acalephs of the East Coast of the United States, — 
Bs a as On Dactylometra quinguecirra Agass, 
AGASSIZ and WHITMAN. Pelagic Fishes. Part I1., with 14 Plates, 
Reports on the Results of the Expedition of 1891 of the U, §, Fish 
“Albatross,” Lieutenant Commander Z. I. 't 
ALEXANDER AGASSIZ, as follows: — 


A. AGASSIZ. The Pelagic Fauna. 
ae The Behini. 
2 The Panamie Deep-Sea Fauna. 
J. BE. BENEDICT. The Annelids. 
K. BRAND. The Sagitta. 
os) The Thalassicols. 


Commission Steamer 
ANNEK, U.S, N., Commanding, in charge of 


C. F. LUTKEN and TH. MORTENSEN, 
The Ophiurides. 

O. MAAS. The Acalephs. 

BE. L. MARK. ‘The Actinarians, 

JOHN MURRAY. ‘The Bottom Specimens. 


C, CHUN The Siphonophores, 
LC The Eyes of Deep-Sea Crustacea. 
W. H. DALL. The Mollusks. 
S. GARMAN. The Fishes, 
H. J. WANSEN, ‘The Cirripeds and Tsopods, 
W. A. HERDMAN, ‘I'he Ascidians. 
S. J. HICKSON. The Antipathids. 
W. E, HOYLE. ‘he Cephalopods. 
G. VON KOCH, The Deep-Sea Corals, 
©. A, KOFOID, Solenogaster. 
R, VON LENDENFELD, The Phospho- 
. Pescont Organs of Fishes, 


ROBERT RIDGWAY. 'The Alcoholic Birds, 

P. SCHIEMENZ. ‘The Pteropods and Hete- 
ropods 

W. PERCY SLADEN. ‘The Starfishes, 

lL. STEJNEGER. The Reptiles. 

THEO. STUDER. The Aleyonarians, 

M. P. A. TRAUTSTEDT, The Salpides and 
Doliolidss, 

EK. P. VAN DUZEE. The Halobatidas, 

H. B. WARD, The Sipunculids, 

H. V. WILSON, The Sponges. 

W. McM. WOODWORTH. ‘The Planarians. 


PUBLICATIONS 


; : OF THE 
1 MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY 


AT HARVARD COLLEGE, 


There have been published of the Butters Vols. I. to XXIX.; 

of the Memoirs, Vols. I. to XXII. 

Vols) XXVIIL and XXX. of the Bertier, and Vols. XIX. to 

XXL. and XXII. of the Memorns, are now in course of publication. 

The Beier and Memorrs are devoted to the publication of 
original work by the Professors and Assistants of the Museum, of 
investigations carried on by students and others in the different 

Laboratories of Natural History, and of work by specialists based 

upon the Museum Collections. 

The following publications are in preparation : — 

Reports on the Results of Dredging Operations from 1877 to 1880, in charge of 
Alexander Agassiz, by the U. S$. Coast Survey Steamer “ Blake,” Lieut. 
Commander C. D, Sigsbee, U. 8. N., and Commander J. R. Bartlett, U. 8.N., 
Commanding. 

Reports on the Results of the Expedition of 1801 of the U.S, Fish Commission 
Steamer “ Albatross,” Lieut. Commander Z. J. Tanner, U. 5. N., Com- 
manding, in charge of Alexander Agassiz, 

Contributions from the Zodlogical Laboratory, in charge of Professor 1. L. 
Mark. 

Contributions from the Geological Laboratory, in charge of Professor Ne 
Shaler. 

Studies from the Newport Marine Laboratory, communicated by Alexander 


Agassiz. 
Subscriptions for the publications of the Museum will be received 
on the following terms : — 
For the Burierm, $4.00 per volume, payable in advance. 
For the Memoirs, $8.00 ** . uh 
These publications are issued in numbers at irregular inter- 
vals; one yolume of the Bulletin (8vo) and half a yolume of the 
Memoirs (4to) usually appear annually, Each number of the Bul- 
letin and of the Memoirs is also sold separately. A price list of 
the publications of the Museum will be sent on application to the 
Director of the Museum of Comparative Zodlogy, Cambridge, Mass, 


ALEXANDER AGASSIZ, Director, 


— 
co 
2) 

{ 

1 
ll 
— 
Te