Full text of "The Ibis"

See other formats

teen

anit Mea!

AYO) hehe

Pialhy

42 Aas

bea

ed
Nay

sha Rh ye
te Tae
Ly aaney

“y Pare

Shas ie
Vet eae HGR

Hi
wis
ye eal

ateiataaaty ri

Pesca utsaata
Are y 4

4M itd

u
firs) tie
Piahsalvay,

Tints
Hun not
see a gs

Seats CaN

a
es oe

<=>

BS
ari

Se ee mae
-S

shee

i
ui

oe a
Saar
ten

aya,

fAG it

4, Lateral : ,

} ay ite LAGE De th yy $3
pn a

ic 4

E
ry

i Athy

eh bh)
“ft
‘
\

vata

is era sae ’
Suan fie rate

{Mattane stata
septate

RU ESM ncaa) POH
Nadya amietcatad iitae HAAG: Tan Hit ma ii
af : nat ian
cy) it ¥,
Sateen a
Saat iene st ft
ang

staan
ane Hh!
ey

bin ty a
any Hh pat

\ anasase f

i
f Sapien
X pe gh iitelae tik
wy wend ht valely » 4 tit
Vgtott i si aieang Nae URC a) Data han ty \
heliela teh ' pays . erate Ayala tn acataly
toatat Teng Mpa Ra atial age ali tuem ated il need Ve
hes Ph i Phovhatgi Peet ay V\talane tn
° su ehec EE be weit ay
yg ¢ Matar te

mail

*
iu raises 1

ASigethesiany

4 Pt ane apace

ul
i Abt sa ted
1 4 < aa uy}
a 3
DTaM el tne
Agree at?

+ ae tia i fon

hits \ ty lell n
Nee NB ath . pity ’ anads

sta lene

me arutur ey?
9 )%

een ah ee
Hie tae.
ey it)

evans bade

4
gaaag)

BVonats
an, M4 Yaehay
le tndeie
whe Maier

maitarts ta

aay
Me a)

se
+

¥
#44)

re es

faite
i na

ti
mare

eterna

vy ‘Oty

Pee vpaais
Ts BG ie

Tees! te dab Laiqitee
day or

Baath

igus Sma Ss

as a ee
ae
ec eae

— Tos
bees Sa

s2=

FeMainns
st
ai

penalty

Mp Pescres

Hat
fe ‘ ¥ ch}
ae . tees
very Wa Fi /

+A ie
Pe}

i i
ace :
nt ae

tte

ana 5
ah OH

int aie
aisle

PepAy aoale
Bina! $8 Se
Agate an
at
Mtatesordeniteha
ogee aT Pa
Taare,

Aveta

Ps 4 Ube
Virva ey VEALED Fa ltated LAM NR rade
Agiiety tye B, eee hy

ee Te
+ Fransees ‘
et

; c e 5
. ft Wels Ee, re v “ ; pe apapeten
HERE ; ; areas ste RMUSCSUm EG Sursenablotsesn tear reyL susie rapytgayatal ted isa stersesepe sturwen tay Rave,
- r , " ’ Nf Mm |
¥, peee sg! fitta

THE FIELD MUSEUM LIBRARY

3 5711 00038 3753

ate

: EER EEEEEEEEBALE A

iy.

ie
aa)

NATURAL HISTORY
MUSEUM

> FOUNDED 18935

4
—_
~

KA ALA AULA AU AUC AUC AUR CAC CRRA A

Aut ual yy)
cc) =

Nuun uml,
mi = CS

CF. GRONE MANN

nee rie TS,

QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY.

EDITED BY

OSBERT SALVIN, M.A., F.R.S.,

STRICKLAND CURATOR IN THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGH, &c.

VOL. VI. 1876.
tA
THIRD SERIES.

Ibidis auspicio novus incipit Tbidis ordo.

LONDON:
JOHN VAN VOORST, 1 PATERNOSTER ROW.
1876.

PRINTED BY TAYLOR AND FRANCIS,

RED LION COURT, FLEET STREET.

PREFACE.

THE completion of the present volume brings the
Third Series of ‘Tun Ists’ to a close. Pressure of
other duties preventing my continuing the sole
charge of the Journal, Mr. P. L. ScLater has, with
the approval of a Meeting of the British Ornitho-
logists’ Union held in May last, consented to join
me in editing a Fourth Series, which will be com-
menced in January next.

In thanking the many contributors to the pages
of ‘Tue Isis’ for their support during my past
term of office as Editor, | beg leave on behalf of
Mr. Scuater and myself to solicit their further aid
in maintaining the high character ‘THe Iprs’ has
hitherto borne in advancing the science of Orni-

thology.

OSBERT SALVIN,
Editor.

Brooklands Avenue, Cambridge.
October 1876.

BRITISH ORNITHOLOGISTS’ UNION.

1876.

{An asterisk indicates an Original Member. ]

Date of
Election.

1874. Epwarp R. Aston, F.Z.S.; Dorset Street, London, W.

1870. AnprEw AnpErson, F.Z.8S.; Futtehgurh, North-West Pro-
vinces, India.

1872. Hanpury Barctay, F.Z.S.; Middleton Hall, Tamworth.

1875. Joun Brpputrx, Capt. 19th Hussars ; Government House,
Calcutta.

1873. W. T. Branrorp, F.R.S. &c.; Geological Survey of India,
Calcutta.

1870. Sir Victor Brooxz, Bart.; Colebrooke, Fermanagh, Ireland.

1871. Arraur Basit Brooxr; Cardney, Dunkeld, N.B.

1866. Henry Bucxtay, F.Z.S.; Edgbaston, Birmingham.

1868. THomas Epwarp Bucxtey, B.A., F.Z.S.; Ardullie Lodge,
Foulis, N. B.

1872. Watrer Lawry Burier, C.M.G., Sc.D., F.L.S., &c.; Wel-
lington, New Zealand. ;

1876. Lord Crirron ; Cobham Hall, Gravesend.

1876, H.R.H. Prince Arruvur, Duxs or Connaveut, K.G.

1874. Joun CorpEavx; Great Cotes, Ulceby, Lincolnshire.

1866. ArrHur Witii1am Cricuton, B.A., F.L.S., F.Z.8.; Broadward
Hall, Salop.

1874. Cuartes Danrorp, F.Z.8.; Knowles, Newton, Devon.

1865, Henry Exes Dresszer, F.Z.8.; 6 Tenterden Street, Hanover
Square, London, W.

* Henry Mavrice Drummonp-Hay, C.M.Z.S8., Lieutenant-Colo-

nel, Royal Perth Rifles; Seggieden, Perth.

1876. Henry Durnrorp; Buenos Ayres.

vl
Date of
Election.

1870. Danter Grravp Exxiot, F.R.S.E., &e.; 5 Rue de Tilsitt,
Paris.
1866. Henry Joun Exwns, F.Z.S.; Preston, Cirencester.
*Tromas Campsett Eyron, F.Z.S.; Eyton Hall, Wellington,
Salop.
1873. H. W. Frinpren, Captain and Paymaster, Royal Artillery.
1867. Grorge Gooca Fowzer, B.A.; Gunton Hall, Lowestoft,
Suffolk.
1865. Rey. Henry Extiotr Fox, M.A.; 30 Warwick Square, London,
S.W.
1873. Atrrep Henry Garrop, M.A.,F.Z.8.; 11 Harley Street, London.
*Freperick DuCanr Gopman, F.L.S., F.Z.8.; 6 Tenterden
Street, Hanover Square, W.
*Prrcy SANDEN GopMan, B.A., C.M.Z.S.; The Grange, Sher-
manbury, Henfield, Sussex.
1874. Major H. Gopwiy-Austsn, F.Z.8.; Shalford House, Guild-
ford, Surrey.
1871. Ropert Gray; 13 Inverleith Row, Edinburgh.
1876. Atpert C. L. G. Ginrner, M.A., M.D., F.R.S., &c.; Keeper
of the Zoological Department, British Museum, London.
*Joun Hunry Gurney, F.Z.8.; Northrepps, Norwich.
1870, Jouw Henry Gurney, Jun., F.Z.8.; Northrepps, Norwich.
1876. H. C. Harrorp; 99th Regiment.

1868, James Epmunp Harrtrine, F.LS., F.Z.8.; 24 Lincoln’s Inn
Fields, London.

1873. Jonny A. Harvir Brown; Dunipace House, Larbert, N.B.

1868. Rev. Hzerserr 8. Hawkins, M.A.; Beyton Rectory, Suffolk.

1875. J. C. Here; Knowles, Newton-Abbot.

1873. Cuartes B. Hopeson, F.Z.8.; 13 Waterloo Street, Bir-
mingham.

*Witrrip Hupiesron Hupuesron, M.A., F.Z.8.; 23 Cheyne

Walk, Chelsea.

1874. Baron A. von Hiern; Moorlands, Bournemouth.

1869. Annan Octavian Hunn, C.B.; Secretary to the Government
of India, Calcutta.

1873. Most Hon. Cuartus, Marquess of Hunrry; 41 Upper Gros-
venor Street, London.

1870. Hon. Hepworra Hyzron-Joturrse; Merstham, Red Hill,
Surrey. .

1870. Col. Leonarp Howarp L. Insy, F.Z.8.; Hythe, Southampton,

Vii
Date of
Election.

1874, Capt. Atexanprr W. M. Crarge Kennepy, F.L.S., F.R.G.S.,
F.Z.S.; Carruchan, Dumfries, N.B.
*ArtuuR Epwarp Knox, M.A., F.LS., F.Z.8.; Trotton House,
Petersfield, Sussex.
1876. Captain Vincent Lueer, R.A.; Colombo, Ceylon.
*Right Hon. THomas Lytrreron, Lord Litrorp, F.L.S., F.Z.S.,
&e.; Lilford Hall, Oundle, Northants.
1874. Major Joun Harus Luoyn, F.Z.8.; 74 Adelaide Road, Haver-
stock Hill, London, N.W.
1875. Jonn Winerirtp Matcorm, M.P.; 7 Stanhope Street, May-
fair, London, W.
1870. C. H. T. Marsmatt, F.Z.8.; Captain, Bengal Staff Corps.
1870. G. F. L. Marswatt, F.Z.8.; Capt. Royal (Bengal) Engineers.
1864. ALEXANDER GoopMAN Morgz, F.L.S. &c.; 3 Botanic View,
Glasnevin, Dublin.
1874. Ruopes W. Morean ; Madras Forest Department, Ootaca-
mund, India.
1876. Huew Nevitt; Ceylon Civil Service.
1872. Francis D’Arcy Wittram Croven Newcome; Feltwell Hall,
Brandon, Suffolk.
*AtFReD Newron, M.A., F.R.S., V.P.Z.8.; Professor of Zoology
in the University of Cambridge.
*Epwarp Newron, M.A., C.M.G., F.L.S., C.M.Z.S., Colonial
Secretary, Mauritius.
1876. Francis NrcHotson ; Stamford Road, Bowdon, Cheshire.
1871. Reetnatp Carew Pore, Lieut. Royal Navy; Yovilton, Il-
chester.
*Joun Witttam PowrrtTt-Orpz, F.Z.8., late Captain, 42nd
(Royal Highland) Regiment ; Auchnaba House, Loch Gilp

' Head, N. B.

1872. R. G. Warptaw Ramsay, 67th Regiment ; White Hill, Lass-
wade, N. B.

1865. Grorcz Dawson Row zy, M.A., F.Z.8.; Chichester House,
Brighton.

1873. Oxttver Buavonampe Coventry St. Jonny, Major R.A., F.Z.8.
*Osspert Sarvin, M.A., F.R.S., &.; 6 Tenterden Street, Han-
over Square, London, W.
1870. Howarp Saunpers, F.Z.S.; 7 Radnor Place, Hyde Park.
*Puitip Lutiey Sciater, M.A., Ph.D., F.R.S., &.; 44 Elvas-
ton Place, Queen’s Gate, London, W.

Viil
Date of
Hlection.

1873. Henry Seersonum; Oak Lea, Collegiate Crescent, Broomhall
Park, Sheffield.

1871. Ricuarp Bowprer Sarr, F.L.S., F.Z.S. ; Senior Assistant,
Zoological Department, British Museum.

1870. G. Ernest SHetrey, F.Z.8., late Captain, Grenadier Guards ;
6 Tenterden Street, Hanover Square, London, W.

1865. Rev. Caartes Wintiam SuepHerD, M.A., F.Z.8.; Trotters-
cliffe, Kent.

1864. Rev. Atrrep Cartes Smira, M.A.; Yatesbury Rectory,
Wiltshire.

_ 1874, Cxrcit Surra; Lydiard House, Taunton, Somersetshire.

1875. A. C. Starx. Hillstead, Torquay, Devon.

1864. Henry Srevenson, F.L.S.; Unthank’s Road, Norwich.

1868. Hanon Sryreman Le Srranex, F.Z.8.; Hunstanton Hall,
Norfolk,

1875. Paent Watrer Lz Srranen, Lieut.-Col. Royal Artillery,
Sheerness. .

1862. Rosert SwinHor, F.R.S., late of H. M. Consular Service,
China. 33 Carlyle Square, London, 8.W.

*Epwarp Cavenpisa Taytor, M.A., F.Z.8.; 743 ermyn Street,

London.

1864, Guorez Cavenpish Taytor, F.Z.8.; 42 Elvaston Place,
Queen’s Gate, London.

1873. WitiiamM Bernuard TrcEermeter, F.Z.8,; Finchley, Middlesex.

*Rev. Henry Baxer Tristram, M.A., LL.D., F.RS., &e.,

Canon of Durham. The College, Durham.

1864. Most Hon. Artruur, Marquess of Twrrppatz, F.R.S., Pres. Z.S.,
Walden Cottage, Chislehurst, Kent.

1864. Henry Morris Urcumr, F.Z.8.; Sherringham Hall, Norfolk.

1872. Herpert Taytor Ussumr, C.M.G., Lieut.-Governor of La-
buan, Borneo.

1874. Cuartes Byerave Wuarron, F.Z.8.; Boundary Road, London,
N.W.

1871. E. Perctvat Wrieut, M.D., F.LS., F.Z.8., Professor of Botany
in the University of Dublin.

1875. Cuartes A. WrieHr.

1876, Cravpe W. Wyrarr; Adderbury, Banbury,

Extra-Ordinary Member.
1860, Atrrep Russe, Watzace, F.Z.8,; Rosehill, Dorking.

Date of
Election.

Honorary Members.

1860. Professor Spencer F, Barrp, Assistant Secretary to the Smith-
sonian Institution, Washington.

1860. Doctor Epvarp Batpamus, Moritzwinger, No. 7, Halle.

1860. Doctor Jean Cazanis, Erster Custos am kéniglichen Museum
der Friedrich-Wilhelm’s Universitit zu Berlin,

1870. Doctor Orro Fryscu, Zoological Museum, Bremen.

1860. Doctor Gustav Hartiaus, Bremen.

1860. Enear Leororp Layarp, 0.M.G., F.Z.8., H.M. Consul, Mew
Caledonia.

1869. Aveust von Prtzety, Custos am k.-k. zoologischen Cabinete
in Wren.

1860. Professor J. Rernnarpt, Kongelige Naturhistoriske Museum
1 Kyobenhavn. |

Foreign Members.

1872. Prof. J. V. BarBoza pu Bocagz, Royal Museum, Lisbon.

1875. Hans Grar von Bertersca, Witzenhausen, Hessen- Nassau.

1872. Prof. J. F. Branpr, Imperial Museum, St. Petersburg.

1873. Rozserr Cotterr, Christiania.

1872. Doctor Extrorr Covers, U.S. Army, Smithsonian Institution,
Washington, D. C.

1875. Marchese Gracomo Doria, Genoa.

1872. Doctor Vicror Fatio, Geneva.

1872. Doctor Hrnry Hitiyer Giexior1, Royal Superior Institute,
Florence.

1872. Doctor Turopor von Hxeveriy, Stuttgart.

1872. Grorce N. Lawrence, New York.

1872. Baron Dz Szrys Lonecuampes, Liege.

1872. Doctor A. J. Matmerzn, Helsingfors.

1872. Doctor A. von Mippenporrr, Dorpat.

1872. AtpHonsre Mritnze-Epwarps, Jardin des Plantes, Paris.

1872. Prof. Gustav Rappz, T%flis.

1872. Count Tommaso Satvapori, Royal Museum, Turin.

1872. Prof. Herman Scuecet, University Museum, Leyden. i

CONTENTS or VOL. VIL.—THIRD SERIES.

(1876.)

Number XXI., January.

I. Second Thoughts on the Genus Micrastur. By Roperr
Riveway, of the Ornithological Department, U.S. National Mu-
seum, Washington . cp cok eae, ita adren es

II. Remarks on some Type Specimens of Trochilide from
the Museums of Neuchatel and Florence. By D. G. Exxror,
ERS ee L.S., & es... sehen Saber « : :

LIL. The Genus Glaucidium. By Rozsert Ripeway, of the
Ornithological Department, U.S. National Meni Wash-
ington. (Plate I.)

IV. Notes on the Ls of Corsica. By C. Byerave
Wauarton, F.Z.8. ; SB ila ls bask oe

VY. Contributions to the Ornithology of Borneo.—Part I. By
R. Bowpier Suarre. (Plate Il.).

VI. Descriptions of two new Species of South-African Birds.
By R. Bowpter SHarpz, F.L.S., F.Z.8., &., Senior Assistant,
Zoological Department, British Museum . Eg aetiae

VII. Notes on the Trochilide. The ate oe opygia.
By D. G. Exrroz, F.R.S.E., F.LS. &e. As ;

VIII. Ornithological Notes from Hone omer aes Pol
Scrater and H. C. Tayior ahi ae Pe dae Oi

IX. Notes on a ‘Catalogue of the Accipitres in the British
Museum,’ by R. Bowdler a acs By J. H. Gurney.
ee TEs : ; ae tam teh hs A

X. Notes on Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan’ (Turkes-
tanskie Jevotnie). By H. E. Dresser

Page

29
o2
o4

Xli

CONTENTS.

Page
XI. On the Assignation of a Type to Linnean Genera, with
especial reference to the Genus Strix. tad ALFRED NeEwrton,
MAG, PeBiSceteab eee ae -, te Cgeeene yee
XII. Notes on the Birds of the Lower Petchora. By Henry
Sernoum, F.Z.S., and Joun A. Harvie Brown. . .. . . 105
XIII. Letters, Announcements, &c. :—
Letters from Capt. Legge, Mr. Cordeaux, Mr. Gurney, Mr.
D. G. Elliot, Mr. T. E. Buckley, and Viscount Walden . . . 126
Noumser XXII., April.
XIV. Notes on some little-known Birds of the new Colony
of the Fiji Islands. By Epear L. Layarp, C.M.G., F.Z.S.,
Administrator of the Government , . < -. . 4... te) nen etLor

XV. Notes on the Ornithology of Fiji, with Dee of
new or little-known Species. By E. L. Layarp, C.M.G., F.Z.S.,
Ese eM MUONSUL A ey wl yt ve iclen = V0 ec es > Sees eee

XVI. Ornithological Notes from the Viioce oe of
Buenos Ayres. By Henry Durnrorp ... . aj. ae a

XVII. Notes on the Genus Be m ane
EEN ER oe re MER Regt pea ee ara : : 4100

XVIII. Notes on Severtzoff’s ‘ Fauna of Turkestan’ tones
tansiie Jeyotnic). By H. i. Dressm 9.9 2) yo vo ee ei ae

XIX. Ornithological Notes made during Trips between
Bloemfontein and the Lydenburg Gold-fields. By F. A. Bar-
BATT GAL AOtO Ok Vea) otis (ae ie hake ween oe? a ass.) 9 eee

XX. Notes on the Birds of the Lower Petchora. By Henry
SeEBouM, F.Z.8., and Joun A. Harvie Brown. (Plate V.) . 215

XXI. Notes on a ‘Catalogue of the Accipitres in the British
Museum,’ by R. Bowdler Sharpe (1874). By J. H. Guryzy . 230

XXII. On Recent Ornithological ee in New Guinea.
By SL SCL ATER ee cit pe sea sl a spi obtains \ Ganon aes

XXIII. Notes on a Collection of Birds from the New He-
brides. “ubyatte-b. LRISTRAM HORS: rae eee Gere

XXIV. On Sericulus xanthogaster, Schl., and Xanthomelus
aureus (linn.). By T. Satvaporr,C.M.Z.8. . . . . ... 267

CONTENTS. Xl

Page
XXV. Notices of recently published Ornithological Works . 270
XXVI. Letters, Announcements, &c. :—

Letters from Mr. H. Stevenson, Count Salvadori, Mr. J. H.
Gurney, and Major J. cs Rie News from Mr. Danford
inj Asia Minor? = 67. eee re en Se

NoumBer XXIII., July.
XXVIII. On the Psittact of the Mascarene Islands. By
ALFRED and Epwarp Newron. (Plate VI.) . . . . . . 281

XXVIII. Notes on the Birds of the Lower Petchora. By
Henry Srrsoum, F.Z.S., and Jonn A. Harvir Brown.
(ilaten VAs) 2 tena ts Se mesa Seige RS Oe RT aes

XXIX. Notes on the Trochilde. The Genera Cyanomyia
and Helwtrypha. By D. G. Exitor, F.RS.E.&e. 2. 2... Bll

XXX. Notes on Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan’ (Turkes-
tanskie Jevotnie). By H. KE. Dresser . . . siete NE

XXXI. On the Contents of a third Box of Birds from Ha-
kodadi, in Northern Japan. By R. Swinnor. (Plate VIII.) . 330

XXXII. Notes on the late Colonel Tickell’s manuscript Work
entitled “Illustrations of Indian Ornithology.” By poe

Viscount Watpun. - {Plates‘IX., X.). 0. 2 es . 336
XXXIII. Further Ornithological News from New Guinea.
By Fo csSera tem MAS Ph DN RST os Bi NY od O87

XXXIV. Notes on a ‘Catalogue of the Accipitres in the
British Museum,’ by R. Bowdler ae we B: By J. H.
GUN AU TURE wie the tee ee ere

XXXV. Description of a new ieiotea of the Genus Tvi-
chostoma from the Island of Celebes. By Arraur, Viscount

NREL ALCP CL. Von egivee mar en 3 at rhe s . 316
XXXVI. On two additional Species of Central-American
Odontophorine. By Osprrt Satvin, M.A., F.R.S., &. . . . 879

XXXVII. Letters, Announcements, &c. :—
Letters from Mr. W. Jesse, Mr. A. B. Meyer, Mr. J. H. Gurney,
Lord Walden, and Count Salvadori. News of Mr. Layard. . 380

X1V CONTENTS.

Page
| NoumBer XXIV., October.
XXXVIII. Description of a new Species of Flycatcher (My-
iagra) from the Fijis, and some Remarks on the Distribution
of the Birds found in those Islands. By Enear Lropotp Layarp,
C.M.G., F.Z.8., lately administering the Government of that
OLOTY Ae aes Niet tee eae Stans ph «(Ray vets ca ks eer

XXXIX. Notes on the Trochilide. The Genera Heliothrix,

Calliphlox, Catharma, and prog ON By D. E. Exwtor,
rs Br OCC a what Bel. a a's eee Eee sis Aa Sadho. eyes! ok Ve Shee eae Ee

XL. Description of a new Tanager of the Genus Calliste, and
Remarks on other recently discovered Species. By P. L. SctuaTEr.
CEa te Xo) in os ci sak oa aes ho Gap me Utne ieee eae ae

XLI. Notes on Severtzoff’s ‘ Fauna of Turkestan’ (Turkes-
tanskie Jevotnie). By H. HE. Drussmm : ... . 08 ie 410

XLII. Notes on Birds collected and observed in the Lyden-
burg District of the Republic of Transvaal. By THomss Ayres.
(Communicated By J. H. Gurnzy). . . .. . Seiki eee

XLII. Notes on the Birds of the Lower Petchora. By
Henry Srresoum, F.Z.8., and Joun A. Harvis Brown . . . 434

XLIV. A Review of the Genus Malimbus, Vieillot. a D.
Cem cLioT, RS. Wo&e, nf Platoua LL) sie nee tts tore . 456

XLY. Notes on a ‘Catalogue of the Accipitres in the British
Museum,’ by R. Bowdler Sharpe (1874). By J. H. Gurnny . 467
XLVI. On some new Species of Birds from Western Ecuador.
By Osprrt Satvin, M.A., F.R.S., &. (Plate XIV.). . . . 493

XLVII. Note on Sued iin Wied. By GrorGE
N. LawRENCE .. . pear Men a . 497

XLVIII. Description of a new ee of Mryiolestes from
Fiji. By HE. L. Layarp, 0.M.G., F.Z.8., &c., H.B.M. Consul at
Naumea, New Caledonia. . . . ri. 08

XLIX. A few Ornithological Notes and Corrections. By Ws
TSB BOGKS MM ass coe cor eR ge tp ee ae es ae Mek eo eee
L. Letters, Announcements, &c. :—

Letters from Mr. E. L. Ti Count Salvadori,-and Mr. R.
Swinhoe™ sr. .eqmeeta tae | shies ang ale Sao v4 oe

Bog” CME AN an saat et RRR 8 sla

PLATES IN VOL.

THIRD SERIES.

I. Glaucidium jardinii . te
{ Fig. 1. Orthotomus borneonensis
’ | Fig. 2. Calamodyta dorie .
III. Buteo hypospodius .
IV. Bradypterus barratti
V. Eggs of Squatarola helvetica .
VI. Paleornis wardi . ;
VII. Eggs of Tringa minuta.
VIU. es 1, Arundinax blakistoni .
Fig. 2. Schceniclus pyrrhulinus .
IX. Picus atratus . °

xX fares 1. Zosterops siamensis
' | Fig. 2. Diceeum trigonostigma
XI | Fig. 1. Trichostoma finschi
Fig, 2: celebense .
XIL { Fig. 1. Calliste melanotis ;
Fig. 2 cyanotis
XIII. { Fig. ER Malimbus cassini :
Fig. 2. rubriceps .

XIV. Capito squamatus

VI.

ERRATA ET CORRIGENDA.

Line
18, for March read April.
7, for 370 read 484.
35, for 16 read 656.
6, for TscuiTREA read ToHITREA.
23, for IX. read X.
30, for IX. read X.
29, for Trichastoma read Trichostoma.
34, for Glictphila read Glyciphila.
34, for Trichastoma read Trichostoma.

13 & 28, for Briiggeman read Briiggemann.

28, for Hdemia read Fuligula,

Yoel kid Ua ald ig Fas

THIRD SERIES.

No. XXI. JANUARY 1876.

I.—Second Thoughts on the Genus Micrastur. By Rozerrt
Ripeway, of the Ornithological Department, U.S. National
Museum, Washington.

Havine recently examined the entire series of the smaller
members of this genus contained in the collection of Messrs.
Salvin and Godman, sent to me for that purpose, I have been
induced to modify to some extent my views given in the
‘Proceedings’ of the Boston Society of Natural History for
1873.

The series is a splendid one, and has, I think, enabled me
to get the right idea of the species of this exceedingly per-
plexing group.

Setting MW. melanoleucus (sive “ semitorquatus’’) and M.
mirandoitit aside, as being distinct enough to need no notice
in connexion with the smaller species, I identify the names
of previous authors as follows :—

Sparvius ruficollis, Vieill., = M. ruficollis, Scl. & Salvy., rufous
phase, adult.

Sparvius gilvicollis, Vieill.*,=M. leucauchen, Scl. & Salv.,

* This cannot, according to the terms of the diagnosis, be M. gil-
collis, Scl. & Saly., if the latter = my concentricus, which = concentricus of

SER. I1I.—VOL. VI. B

2 Mr. R. Ridgway on the Genus Micrastur.

M. gilvicollis, Pelz. Orn. Voy. Novara (= M. ruficollis, plum-
beous phase, adult). }

Falco leucauchen, Temm.,= M. ruficollis, Scl. & Salv., rufous
phase (?), young.

Falco xanthothorax, Temm.,—= WM. ruficollis, rufous adult.

Nisus concentricus, Less., is undeterminable ; and if the type
does not exist, the name may be thrown aside as entirely
worthless, though Pelzeln distinguished a very distinct species
by this name, which shguld be adopted for that bird*.

Micrastur guerilla, Cass..=M. guerilla, Scl. & Salv.

Micrastur zonothorax,Cabanis,=M. zonothoraz, Scl.&Salv.

My M. leucauchen (paper in Pr. Boston Soc.) is the young
of M. leucauchen of Scl.&Salv.; and they, together, are young
and old plumages of M. ruficollis.

I was certainly wrong in referring so many of the recog-
nized forms to one species; but this was partly owing to the
impossibility of making desirable comparisons.

Before proceeding to give a diagnosis of the species I now
distinguish, it will be best to make a few remarks regarding
the stages of plumage assumed by them, and which; if clearly
borne in mind, will remove the greatest obstacle towards
understanding the species. In the first place, there is no
sexual difference in coloration, beyond what results from
irregular variations of an individual character ; in the next.
place, in M. guerilla and M. ruficollis, there are two quite.
different “phases” of plumage, corresponding in every par-
ticular to the grey and rufous plumages of certain Owls
(notably Scops, Glaucidium, and Syrnium aluco), and which
are most unquestionably entirely independent of sex, age, or
season. ‘The grey phase may be taken as the normal one,
since the other is merely the evidence of a colour-variation,

Pelzeln. It is distinctly stated to have the posterior lower parts barred,
which the latter has not; and there are other points which point to 4.
leucauchen, Scl. & Salvy. [At our request Mr. D. G. Elliot searched for
Vieillot’s type of MZ. gilvicollis in the Paris Museum, but failed to find it.
We now think, with Mr. Ridgway, that the name J. concentricus head
best be used for the Guiana bird.—Ep. |

* | Lesson’s type does exist, and is doubtless the bird here called JZ.
concentricus, and also by v. Pelzeln.—Ep. |

Mr. R. Ridgway on the Genus Micrastur. 3

termed by Pelzeln “ erythrism,” and entirely analogous to
the condition of melanism. The condition is most exaggerated
in M. ruficollis, but it is plainly visible in M. guerilla. No
rufous specimens have been seen of M. concentricus, Pelz., nor
M. pelzelni ; and, on the other hand, IJ have seen no plumbeous
examples of M. zonothoraz. But such probably occur, and

should be borne in mind before any new form is described.
Synopsis of the Species of Micrastur.
A. Outer toe decidedly longer than the inner.
a, Size large (wing more than 8 inches),

1. Above black, with a nuchal collar of white or ochraceous.

M. melanoleucus *.

2. Above plumbeous, without a nuchal collar .. MM. nurandolli.

b. Size small (wing less than 8 inches). ;

3. Wing 6:50-7:10, tail 6:90-7:50. Tail crossed by 3-6 (¢erminal
bar not counted) indistinct bars of white or pale greyish. Adult.
Tail-bars 3-4; above plumbeous, the dorsal region sometimes
chocolate; throat light grey; jugulum, breast, and entire lower
parts barred with white and dusky. Young. Above dark clove-
brown, plain or indistinctly spotted posteriorly; beneath white
or buff, rarely immaculate, usually coarsely barred.

M. guerilla.

4. Wing 6°90-7'50, tail 7°60-8°40. Tail with 4-7 distinct white
bars. Adult. Above, including neck and most of head, rusty
chocolate, less reddish anteriorly ; throat light chocolate; jugu-
lum and entire lower parts everywhere barred with white and
dusky. Tail-bands 4-5. Young. Above dark sooty brown, in-
distinctly barred with rusty ; crown and nape sooty black; lower
parts white or buff, rarely immaculate, usually barred, and with-
out rufous tinge on the breast; tail-bars 6-7. MM. zonothoraz.

5. Wing 6:60-7:10, tail 7°30-7°80. Tail with 4-8 usually distinct
white bars. Adult. Breast washed with rufous; throat light
grey; other lower parts everywhere barred with white and
dusky ; crown plumbeous; other upper parts varying from clear
light bluish plumbeous to rusty brown. Tail-bars 4. Young.
Above varying from greyish brown to dark rusty chocolate ;
throat and half-crescent behind the ear-coverts white, in abrupt
contrast ; beneath white, coarsely barred with dusky brown

M. ruficolhs.

* I cannot identify Sparvius senntorquatus, Vieill., with this species,
since that is said to have the top of the head white, barred with blacl,
whereas it is always plain black in this bird, which, in the adult plumage
is S. melanoleucus, Vieill. |

-t Mr. R. Ridgway on the Genus Micrastur.

6. Wing 6:50, tail 630. Adult. Tail crossed by 2 bars of pale
brownish grey. Above uniform dark plumbeous, the tail darker
and wings browner ; throat light grey; rest of lower parts white,
barred everywhere with dusky, these bars very narrow and dis-
tant on the flanks and crissum .......... M. pelzelni.

B. Outer toe not longer (sometimes shorter) than the inner.

7. Wing 7:10-7:75, tail 6:30-7:00. Adult. Tail-bands 1-4, narrow,
white; upper parts dull plumbeous, the tail darker, and the
wings browner ; throat greyish white ; other lower parts white,
the crissum immaculate, the other portions barred with plum-
beous. Young. Similar, but a whitish crescent behind the ear-
coverts, the upper parts browner, the lower tinged with ochra-
ceous, and the tibice and flanks also immaculate.

al | M. concentricus.

The following table will serve to elucidate the synonymy
of the species, as understood by me :—

| 1875 1874 1873 1869 1865
|| (Ridgway). (Sharpe). (Ridgway). (Sel. & Salvin). (Pelzeln).

| 4, zonothorax. | zonothorax ruficollis, pt. | zonothorax

. . : ~ J} leucauchen leucauchen xanthothorax

The following is a description of M. pelzelni :—

i Micrastur PELZELNI, Ridgway.

ve Sp. Ch. Outer toe decidedly longer than the inner; tail
it shorter than the wing. Adult g* above uniform (continu-
ous) dark plumbeous. ‘Tail darker, narrowly tipped with
white, and crossed by two narrow bands of dull brownish
grey, becoming white on inner webs. Sides of head and
neck plumbeous grey; throat light grey; rest of lower parts
white, marked everywhere with narrow transverse bars of
dark plumbeous or slate, these bars widest on the breast
(where they are narrower than the white interspaces), and

| | . * Type of species in Mus. Salvin and Godman, from Sarayacu, Upper
il i Ucayali, Peruvian Amazons, collected by E. Bartlett, August 2, 1865.

Mr. D. G. Elliot on some Trochilide. 5

narrowest on the flanks and crissum, where they are very
distant. Wing 6°50 inches, tail 6°30, culmen ‘60, tarsus 2°30,
middle toe 1:20.

Remarks. At first sight this species has a very close re-
semblance to the plumbeous phase of M. guerilla; but upon
a close comparison it is found to differ essentially in having
the tail shorter than the wing, instead of longer, and to be
crossed by much fewer (two instead of three or four) light
bars. With respect to the shortness of the tail, it agrees with
M. concentricus ; but that species differs (not only from this,
but all others of the genus) in having the lateral toes of nearly
equal length, the outer, if either, being the shorter, and also
in having the crissum unbarred white. MM. mirandollii, one
of the large species, alone agrees with the present bird in
having the tail shorter than the wing, and, at the same time,
the outer toe longer than the inner.

II.—Remarks on some Type Specimens of Trochilide from the
Museums of Neuchatel and Florence. By D. G. Extior,
E.R.S.E., F.L.S., &c.

Tue receipt of three of Tschudi’s types from the Museum of
Neuchatel, through the kindness of M. Coulon, the director,
has given me an opportunity of making several comparisons,
the results of which may not perhaps be uninteresting to
ornithologists.

BovuRCIERIA INSECTIVORA.

Trochilus (Lampornis)insectivorus, Tschudi, Fauna Peruana,
p- 248, t. 28. f. 1. }

Bourcieria insectivora, Gould, Intr. Troch. p. 185, sp. 278.

Hab. Peru.

In the ‘Fauna Peruana,’ T’schudi described and figured a
Humming-bird obtained by him between Huari and Chaga-
cancha, at a height of 14,600 feet above the sea, in Peru, as
Trochilus insectivorus. It was evidently either a young bird
or a female; and as, until lately, no other specimens than
those obtained by Tschudi have reached us, naturalists have

6 Mr. D. G. Elhot on some

been in some doubt whether Tschudi’s bird belonged to a
distinct species, or to one already described ; at the same time
the examples presented certain differences not reconcilable
with any specimens in our collections. Through the kind-
ness of M. Taczanowski, director of the Warsaw Museum, I
have lately received a specimen of a fine adult male, shot by M.
Jelski in Peru, the country whence Tschudi’s bird came, and
which, I have no doubt, I am right in attributing to B.
imsectivora. In order to satisfy ourselves in the matter, Mr.
Salvin wrote to M. Coulon, at Neuchatel, for the loan of
Tschudi’s type, a request which, with his characteristic libe-
rality, was at once acceded to. On comparison it appears to
be a female; and therefore, as the male has never been de-
scribed, and as it is quite different from any known species
of Bourcieria, I havé thought it might be useful for ornitho-
logists to become acquainted with it in the adult dress. It
is nearest to B. fulgidigula in the group to which it belongs,
and not to B. conradi, as supposed by Mr. Gould. It may
be described as follows :—

Head and back of neck jet-black ; centre of the crown bril-
lant metallic golden green, very bright and conspicuous.
Throat metallic green, this colour extending over the sides of
the neck, but much less brilliant, beimg a kind of metallic
gloss on the black of that part. Back and upper tail-coverts
metallic grass-green. Wings like the back, primaries pur-
plish brown. Upper part of breast, extending to the green
of the throat, pure white; rest of underparts and under tail-
coverts shining grass-green. Median tail-feathers ‘shining
grass-green ; remainder pure white tipped with green, this
last becoming more extensive as it proceeds towards the outer-
most rectrices, which are nearly one third green from the tip,
and running much further towards the base on the outer web
than on the inner. The bill is long, straight, and pointed,
black throughout. The feet flesh-colour.

The female (‘Tschudi’s type) differs in having the head,
throat, and upper parts shining green, with none of the black
observable in the male. Median rectrices green; rest white,
tipped with black glossed with green. The white is much

Type Specimens of 'Trochilide. 7

more extensive upon the tail-feathers than on those of the
male; but this appears to be characteristic of the females of
all the various species of the genus Bourcieria.

The present species is one of the very handsomest of this
genus, being only exceeded in beauty by B. inca, Gould.

HELIODOXA LEADBEATERI,

Trochilus leadbeateri, Bourc. Rev. Zool. 1843, p. 102.

Trochilus otero, Tschudi, Consp. Av., Wiegm. Archiv, 1843,
p. 890; id. Faun. Per. p. 249, taf. xxi. fig. 2 (1845-46).

Leadbeatera grata, Gould, Intr. Troch. p. 75, sp. 112.

_ Leadbeatera otero, Gould, Intr. Troch. p. 74, sp. 110.

Leadbeatera grata, Bonap. Trochil. Rev. Mag. Zool. 1854,
p: 251,

Leadbeatera otero, Bonap. Trochil. Rev. Mag. Zool. 1854,
past.

Leadbeatera splendens, Gould, Intr. Troch. p. 74, sp. 111.

Heliodoxa otero, Gould, Mon. Troch. u. pl. xevi.

Heliodoxa leadbeateri, Gould, Mon. Troch. ui. pl. xevii.

Hab. Venezuela, Columbia, Peru, Bolivia.

This bird was first described by Bourcier in the ‘ Revue
Banlosionias for April 1843, from New Granada; and in the
same year Tschudi described and figured it ni Peru as 7.
otero. Succeeding authors have kept these birds separate,
notably Mr. Gould, founding the species upon the size, chiefly
that of the bill. In his ‘Introduction’ to the Trochilide,
Mr. Gould further distinguishes the bird from Venezuela as
Leadbeatera splendens, stating that it is allied to the Bolivian
bird, but differs in having a “straighter and shorter bill, and
in the green tint of the under surface.” Lately Mr. Buckley
has brought specimens from Chairo, in Bolivia, a place about
6000 feet above the sea; and these are not to be distinguished
from the Columbian bird. Tschudi’s type of Trochilus otero is
quite a young bird, and in length of bill and general size is
like specimens from Columbia; while the Venezuelan birds,
L. splendens, and adult so-called otero, from Bolivia, with the
long bills, are, so far as I am able to see, precisely alike; and
intermediate lengths of bill are obtainable in specimens from

8 Mr. D. G. Elhot on some

Columbia and Bolivia respectively. Besides the great diffi-
culty of recognizing more than one species by size (for there
is absolutely no change of colour or brilliancy in the plumage
to warrant any specific rank being granted to more than one
form) , there is the geographical distribution of the species. If
three species are to be accepted, we find that L. splendens in
the north is separated from JL. otero in Bolivia by L. grata
of Columbia, and that the last two become mingled toge-
ther in Bolivia—not at all a probable state of things for
really distinct species. As in many groups of Humming-
birds, a variability in size of bill and length of wing, and
perhaps also of tail, is discernible; but if these, unsup-
ported by other more important characters, are to be accepted
as always denoting distinct species, much confusion is certain
to be the result, and no limit can be fixed beyond which any
naturalist, possessed with keen sight and enthusiastic appre-
ciation of minute difference, may not go. It may, however,
be advanced, with much probability, that there is only one
species of those birds consigned to the genus Leadbeatera,
whose range extends from Venezuela, through Columbia, into
Bolivia, being somewhat variable in the size of the bills of indi-
viduals from some localities, though it is almost certain that
a large series of specimens would yield a regular series of in-
termediate measurements. I do not see that Bonaparte had
any reason for taking this bird out of the genus Heliodova,
and, therefore, have not adopted his term.

LEUCIPPUS LEUCOGASTER.

Trochilus leucogaster, Tschudi, Consp. Av. in Wiegm. Archiv,
1844, p. 297.

Trochilus chionogaster, Tsch. Faun. Peruan. p. 247, t. 22.
fig. 2.

Leucippus chionogaster, Gould, Intr. Troch. p. 150, sp. 321.

Trochilus ( ?) hypoleucus, Gould, P. Z. 8. 1846, p. 90,
sp. 16.

Leucippus pallidus, Tacz. P. Z. 8. 1874, p. 542.
Hab. Peru and Bolivia.
This species, first procured by Tschudi in Peru, has received

Type Specimens of Trochilide. 9

many names by different authors. The specimens with white
spots in the tail, which may possibly be females, were named
by Mr. Gould ZL. hypoleucus; but this has been placed as a
synonym of ‘T'schudi’s appellation by that naturalist. Re-
cently Mr. Buckley has brought specimens from Bolivia,
which, on comparison with Tschudi’s type, are found to be
the same. This genus, therefore, will consist only of two
species*, the present and the ZL. chlorocercus, Gould, de-
scribed in the ‘ Proceedings’ of the Zoological Society for
1866, p. 194, which differs chiefly in having the throat spot-
ted with brown, instead of being pure white. Tschudi’s bird
was first described as 7. leucogaster (loc. cit.), a name after-
wards altered to T. chionogaster in the ‘ Fauna Peruana;’
the name first applied must, of course, be the one adopted.
In the year 1865, in the ‘ Annals’ of the Florence Mu-
seum, Sig. Benvenuti described four species of Humming-
birds, coming from New Granada, as new. ‘The descriptions
given, and the comparisons made, did not indicate them as
belonging to unknown forms; but it was impossible to deter-
mine their real specific value without having access to the
examples themselves. Having requested Dr. Giglioli to for-
ward the types to me, he most kindly sent three of them (all
that were in the museum); and I am now able to determine

* In the P.Z.S. for 1874, M. Taczanowski described a specimen of
Leucippus as L. pallidus, from Peru, differing from L. leucogaster in being
slightly larger, and having a “nuance grisdtre” on the back and head.

This is undoubtedly “ Trochilus turnert,’ Bourcier (Revue Zoologique

1846, p. 313), the type of which is in my collection, and which is cha-
racterized in his description as having “la téte, cou, dos, couvertures
alaires et caudales vert grisdtre luisant.” This haslong since been placed
among the synonyms of L. leucogaster, as being simply a phase of plu-
mage that is met with in nearly every group of the Trochilide, where
specimens are found that exhibit a colour slightly at variance with
the typical style, as, for instance, yellowish green, or, as in this case,
greyish green, instead of pure green. These differences, however, like
those of slight variations in length of bill, wings, or tail, have no specific
value. I have therefore placed Z. pallidus among the synonyms of
L. leucogaster ; for it does not seem to be at all necessary to elevate Z.
turneri ‘into a separate species, of which LZ. pallidus of Taczanowski
would certainly be a synonym.

===

10 Mr. D. G. Elliot on some Trochilide.

these without any doubt whatever. The birds named were
Polytmus (Campylopterus) cecilie, Mellisuga (Panoplites)
judith, Mellisuga (Cynanthus) salvadorii, and Mellisuga (Eri-
ocnemis) ridolfit. The first of these I have not seen, as it
is in the Museum of Turin ; but on writing to Count Salva-
dori, he assures me that it is only a female of Campylopterus
lazulus; and I believe this identification to be perfectly cor-
rect. ‘The second is

Metuisuea (PANOPLITES) JUDITH.

Mellisuga judith, Benv. Ann. del R. Mus. Florent. 1865,
p- 208, sp. 11.

- This bird proves to be the Panoplites flavescens, with which

Signor Benvenuti had compared it; and I cannot perceive
that the differences given by him were in any way of suffi-
cient consequence to cause him to give the specimen a new
name. It is a male, in adult plumage; and the name of M.
judith must become a synonym of P. flavescens.

The third was named

MeE.uisuea (CYNANTHUS) SALVADORII.

Mellisuga salvadorii, Benv. Ann. del R. Mus. Floren. 1865,
p. 204.

The type of this so-called species is an adult female of Cy-
nanthus cyanurus in the ordinary state of plumage, such as
is commonly observed in all the specimens of this sex com-
ing from Bogota. There is nothing to distinguish it as dis-
tinct; and the name given by Sig. Benvenuti must become a
synonym.

The last described is

Me.uisuea (HRIOCNEMIS) RIDOLFII.

Mellisuga ridolfi, Benv. Ann. del R. Mus. 1865, p. 205.

This bird, on examination, proves also to be a female of a
well-known species, Hriocnemis vestita, one of the commonest
and best-known among Humming-birds. The name ridolfii
must sink into a synonym.

It is a pity that before naming these birds as distinct,
Signor Benvenuti had not followed the advice given -to him
by M. Sallé in the letter published in his article, and sent

My. R. Ridgway on the Genus Glaucidium. 1]

them to Paris or London, where they would at once have
been identified, and thus some useless synonyms have been
spared from our already overloaded lists, through which the
much suffering naturalist is obliged to “ plod his weary way.”

Il1.—The Genus Glaucidium. By Rozsertr Riveway, of the
Ornithological Department, U.S. National Museum, Wash-
ington.

(Plate I.)

Two monographs of the genus Glaucidium have recently ap-
peared—the first in the ‘ Proceedings’ of the Boston Society
of Natural History for May 1873, by the writer, and the
second in ‘ The Ibis’ for January 1875. The latter, by Mr.
R. Bowdler Sharpe, is a review of the former paper, and em-
bodies, besides certain criticisms, numerous remarks based
upon very large series of the several species. The present
paper represents the conclusions arrived at after a careful
reconsideration of the subject, with much additional material,
and the benefit of Mr. Sharpe’s monograph, and is intended
as a special discussion of the points of variance between the
two memoirs.

The following table will show the main points of relation-
ship between the conclusions of the two papers referred to
and those arrived at in the present one :—

Ridgway, 1873. Sharpe, 1874. Ridgway, 1875.
1. G, passerinum, var. | 1. G. gnoma ( Wagi.). | 1. G. gnoma (Wagi.).
californicum, Sel.
3. G. pumilum. ec ins atti
2. G. pumilum. 2. G. griseiceps, Shrp. mek F ;
PG nae} | 8. G. jardinil 2, G. jardinii.
. G, jardinii. '
5. G. ferrugineum. 7. G. phaleenoides.
6. G. infuscatum. 6. G. ferox. 4, G. ferrugineum.
» var. gnoma. | 8. G. ridgwayi,
7. G. nanum. 4, G. nanum. 3. G. nanum.
8. G. siju 9. G. siju. 6. G. siju.

racters :—

12 Mr. R. Ridgway on the Genus Glaucidium.

A. Nostril opening in the middle of the cere.
a. Sides of the breast distinctly spotted.

1. G. anoma. Colour varying from brownish plumbeous to reddish
umber. Markings on the pileum guttate orcircular. Tail dusky
greyish brown or blackish dusky; bands white, not complete,
7-8. Wing 3°30-4:00 inches, tail 2°40-2:80,

2, G.sarpinu. Colour varying from umber to dark sepia or bright
ferruginous. Markings on the pileum larger, more generally
distributed, cordate or circular. Tail dusky black or dusky fer-
ruginous ; bands white and incomplete, 5-7, or clear rufous,
7-8 (“lansbergi’’). Wing 3°80-4:25, tail 2:55-3:00.

3. G. NANuM. Colour varying from brownish grey to reddish grey.
Markings on the pileum partly linear and partly guttate. Tail
dusky brown; bands clear rufous or reddish white, continuous,
8-12. Wing 3°85-4°60, tail 2-90-3-40.

b. Sides of the breast not spotted.

4, G. FERRUGINEUM. Colour varying from brownish grey to bright
ferruginous. Markings on the pileum narrowly linear. Tail
dusky brown, brownish black, or ferruginous; if banded, the
bands clear rufous, reddish white, or pure white ; if not
banded, the colour uniform bright rufous. Wing 3:50-4:60, tail
2°:20-3°50.

5. G. puminuM. Colour varying from umber to rich chocolate, the
pileum abruptly greyer. Markings on the pileum minute, cir-
cular or elliptical. Tail black; bands white, not continuous,
4-5. Wing 3:30-3-70, tail 2-10-2-40.

B. Nostril opening in the anterior edge of the cere.

6. G. sisvu. Colour greyish brown. Markings of the pileum dia-
mond-shaped. ‘Tail dusky brown; bands continuous, white,
white and rufous, or rufous, 6-7.

1. GLAUCIDIUM GNOMA.

Glaucidium passerinum, var. californicum, Ridgw. Proc.
Boston Soc. N. H. May 1873, p. 94.

Glaucidium gnoma, Sharpe, Ibis, Jan. 1875, p. 56, pl. i.

Hab. Western Province of North America, from Puget
Sound to Arizona (Nat. Mus.); Colorado (C. E. Aiken) ;
Vancouver Island (fide Sharpe, l.c.); Tablelands of Mexico
(cab. G. N. Lawrence) ; Guatemala (fide Sharpe, l. c.).

This form is very much more nearly related to the G. pas-
serinum of Europe than to any of the other American species,
G. jardinii being its nearest ally. After a very careful com-
parison of specimens, I find it to differ from its European

Mr. R. Ridgway on the Genus Glaucidium. 13

analogue in just the same respects that Surnia hudsonia,
Nyctale richardsoni, Syrnium cinereum, and Otus wilsonianus
do from their Old-World representatives S. ulula, N. teng-
malmi, S. lapponicum, and O. vulgaris, viz. in darker shade
and greater area of the dark tints. The case is exactly par-
allel; only the differences are in this instance less exaggerated.
There can be no question that the two forms are derivatives
from a common ancestral circumpolar stock, and that they
have not yet become very widely differentiated, although
perhaps now isolalated geographically. Evidence, however,
is wanting to show that the present form extends northward
along the Pacific coast to Alaska, so as to connect its range
with that of G. passerinum in Eastern Siberia. It is but
another instance of Palearctic birds finding their only Ame-
rican representatives in the Western Province of the Nearctic
Region, other examples of which are to be seen in the genera
Cinclus, Nucifraga (“ Picicorvus’’), Coccothraustes (“ Hespe-
riphona”’), Pica rustica, Cypselus (“ Panyptila’’), Falco saker,
&c. Whether the American form is to be called G. passe-
rinum, var. gnoma (G. passerinum gnoma is the form which I
now prefer), or simply G. gnoma, is, perhaps, a matter of in-
dividual taste.

The original description by Wagler of his G. gnoma had

been consulted by me; and it was only after a long consider- ©

ation of the question whether the term “ guttate” was in-
tended to mean a form of spot inclining to a circular or to a
longitudinal form, that the latter conclusion was adopted, and
Wagler’s species accordingly identified with the streaked-
crowned Mexican bird. ‘This conclusion seemed at the time
the more reasonable, from the fact that the latter bird was
extremely common where Wagler’s G. gnoma came from,
while the bird which Mr. Sclater called G. californicum was
at that time known to American writers only from within
the United States, Mr. Lawrence’s specimen having been
seen by me subsequently. In fact it is only after a careful
reading of Wagler’s description, and comparison with spe-
cimens of the two species side by side, and exceedingly care-
ful weighing of all questions, that Dr. Coues and [I at last,

14 Mr. R. Ridgway on the Genus Glaucidium.

hesitatingly, agreed that the grey form of G. ferrugineum
was meant*.
_ Mr. Sharpe includes this species among those which “ do
not, so far as he can learn, ever have a rufous phase.” Al-
though this is true, if comparison is made with the extremely
rufous phase of G. ferrugineum and G. jardinii, there is never-
theless a distinctly marked rusty extreme, very different from
the ordinary greyish brown, and still more so from the op-
posite plumbeous extreme. Mr. Sharpe’s plate, above cited,
does not quite represent either phase in its extreme, as re-
presented in the series before me. These differences of plu-
mage I consider to be neither sexual, seasonal, nor progres-
sive, and to represent just the same variation that we see in
the other species above mentioned, as well as certain species
of Scops and Syrnium alucot, only in a less exaggerated
degree.

A young specimen from Arizona differs from the adult
(grey phase) only in lacking the spots on the pileum, which
is uniform brownish grey.

2. GLAUCIDIUM JaRDINU. Plate [.

Glaucidium jardinu, Ridgw. l.c. p. 99; Sharpe, J. ¢. pp.
43, 57.

? Glaucidium lansbergu, Ridg. I. c. p. 98.

Hab. Northern South America: Bogota (Nat. Mus.) ;
Ecuador? (Cab. G. N. Lawrence, rufescent); Caracas (Mus.
Philad. Acad., rufescent); Guiana (Cab. G. N. Lawrence,
brown).

While admitting the probability that G. lansbergi repre-
sents the rufous plumage of the same species as G. jardinit,
I am by no means certain that such is the case. The large,
round, and generally distributed spots on the pileum, and the
conspicuous transverse markings of the upper parts, certainly
suggest their close relationship; but the wide differences in

* The following is to be added to the synonyms of this form :—

“Strix elata, Natterer, Mus. Vindob.” apud Bonap. Consp. i. p. 86, 1850.

Glaucidium elata, Bonap. lc. p. 86 (“Stmilis 8. passerine, sed cauda
longiore.” From Mexico.)

+ Also certain species of the Falconine genus Micrastur.

M&NHanhsrt imp

eulemans lth.

=
Bi

J.C

IDIUM JARDINII.

GLAU

Mr. R. Ridgway on the Genus Glaucidium. 15

the pattern of the tail-markings are hard to reconcile with a
belief in their identity, especially in view of the great con-
stancy of this feature in the two phases of G. ferrugineum.

Had I been able to compare the two forms side by side, I
should probably have been induced to hint at the possibility
of their identity ; but the only specimens of G. /ansbergi seen
at the time my descriptions were prepared, were in a collec-
tion which contained no example of G. jardinii.

3. GLAUCIDIUM NANUM.

Glaucidium nanum, Ridgw. l.c. p. 104; Sharpe, l.c. pp.
41, 57, 3

Hab. Chili (Nat. Mus., Mus. Boston Soc.); ‘ Patagonia
as far north as Rio Negro” (fide Sharpe).

4, GLAUCIDIUM FERRUGINEUM.

Glaucidium ferrugineum, Ridgw. l.c. p. 100.

Glaucidium infuscatum, Ridgw. l. c. p. 102 (et “ var. gnoma,
p: 103).

Glaucidium ferox, Sharpe, l.c. pp. 45-55, 57 (nec Stria
ferox, Vieill.!).

Glaucidium phalenoides, Sharpe, J. c. pp. 51, 58.

Glaucidium ridgwayt, Sharpe, l. c. pp. 55, 58.

?? Glaucidium cobanense, Sharpe, Ibis, April 1875, pp. 259,
260.

Hab. The whole of Tropical America, southward to Peru and
Bolivia (fide Sharpe), and northward to the southern border
of the Western United States, Tucson, Arizona (Bendire, _
spec. in Nat. Mus.) ; both coasts and interior of Middle Ame-
rica, Mazatlan, Colima, Tehuantepec, Mirador, Orizaba, Yu-
catan, Guatemala, San Salvador, Costa Rica, Guyaquil, Ceara,
Brazil (Nat. Mus.) ; Matamoras and Honduras (Cad. G. N.
Lawrence); Trinidad (=“ phalenoides”’), Caracas, Ecuador,
Peru, and Amazon, Bolivia, (fide Sharpe).

The above synonymy will at once indicate that while I
agree with Mr. Sharpe in considering my G. ferrugineum and
G. infuscatum to be the same species, I differ from him re-
garding the name to be used to designate the species, and also
in reference to the number of names included among its

16 My. R. Ridgway on the Genus Glaucidium.

synonyms. Mr. Sharpe is certainly at fault in his identifi-
cation of the Strix ferox of Vieillot, the description of which
distinctly states that the crown is spotted with white*, whereas
in every plumage of the present bird it is narrowly streaked.
The tail is also stated to be spotted with white. This form is
perhaps to be referred to G. pumilum; but this is uncertain.

Although seventy specimens have been examinedt+ by me
(nearly twice the number inspected by Mr. Sharpe), I cannot
recognize the local differences upon which Mr. Sharpe bases
his G. phalenoides and G. ridgwayi, and consider them un-
tenable even as climatic or geographical races, and conse-
quently include these names among the synonyms of a species
far more variable individually than climatically.

5. GLAUCIDIUM PUMILUM.

Glaucidium pumilum, Ridgw. l.c. p. 97; Sharpe, /. c. pp.
40, 56.

Glaucidium griseiceps, Sharpe, /. c. pp. 41, 56.

Hab. Eastern South America, north to Guatemala.

Mr. Sharpe remarks that he considers this species to be
“confined to Brazil, and not to range, as Mr. Ridgway sup-
poses, into Central America..... Consequently the two spe-
cimens from Guatemala in Mr. Ridgway’s paper are G. gri-
seiceps aud not G. pumilum” (pp. 40, 41). This statement
prompted a re-examination of my Guatemalan specimen, which
proves to be an extreme example of G. pumilum, as distin-
guished from “ G. griseiceps,” and corresponds exactly with the
figure on plate u. fig. 1, except that it has even more chestnut
lower parts and back. This specimen was procured by exchange
from the Boston Society of Natural History, in whose col-
lection were several similar ones, obtained in Guatemala by
Van Patten. The immature example in Mr. Lawrence’s col-
lection, mentioned on page 98 of my monograph, is exactly

* “Capite nigricante fusco, albido maculato; superciliis albis; corpore
supra obscuré fusco; rectricibus albo maculatis ; gula, jugulo pectoreque
fuscis; ventre albo; rostro virescente.”—Enc. Méth. 1289.

t+ Of these but one South-American specimen has the tail white-
banded; this is the type of the “ G. enfuscatum, var. infuscatum,” of my.
monograph.

On the Ornithology of Corsica. 17

intermediate between pumilum and “ griseiceps.” The latter
I consider to be unquestionably the grey extreme of the same
species, the rufescent phase of which is G. pumilum—the
differences being exactly parallel with those noticeable in G.
gnoma.

6. GLAUCIDIUM SIJU.
Glaucidium siju, Ridgw. l.c. p. 105 ; Sharpe, J. c. p. 59.
Hab. Cuba.

IV.—Nofes on the Ornithology of Corsica,
By C. Byerave WaHarton, F.Z.8.

Ir must not for one moment be thought that these notes pro-
fess to give a complete list of the birds of Corsica. They
simply embody the results of my personal experience during
a residence of nearly eight months in the island. Unfor-
tunately by far the greater part of that time was spent on the
west coast (undoubtedly the worst for birds), or I feel sure
many more species would have been noticed than are included
in the following list. Of the 113 species enumerated, 90
were killed by myself, and the remaining 23 were otherwise
carefully identified.

Landing at Ajaccio on Sept 26th, 1874, my researches were
confined to the west coast until the beginning of March 1875 ;
I then crossed the island and spent a short time at Bastia
and Aleria on the east, returned to Ajaccio on March 19th, and
remained till April 7th, then recrossed the island, and, spend-
ing only two days in Corte, passed till May 20th in or near
Bastia. .

Though the laws concerning guns hampered me consider-
ably during the latter part of my stay, I had not much to
complain of till the 2nd of May: on that day three weeks’
work in the swamps of Biguglia told on me in the shape of
fever; and though not as bad as it might have been, I was
advised by my doctor to leave the island as soon as my health
permitted. Thus was my chance of noticing several more

SER. III.—VOL. VI. C

18 Mr. C. Bygrave Wharton on the

spring migrants, and of getting a few good nests, completely
extinguished.

There is what they call a museum at Ajaccio; but as it
contains birds from all quarters of the globe, which seem to
be arranged according to size, and have only a number (and
not always even that) attached to them, and as I was unable
to discover the existence of a catalogue to which the num-
bers might refer, the whole pan was of course practically
worthless.

My best thanks are due to Messrs. H. EH. Dresser and
Howard Saunders for their kindness in assisting me in the
identification of a few small Warblers, sent to England tor
that purpose.

]. FAaLco PEREGRINUS. '

Very few observed. One seen in captivity, that had been
taken winged at Porto Vecchio in March, appeared to be less
than the usual size.

2. ALCO TINNUNCULUS.
Several seen during the winter, but fewer towards spring.

3. Mitvus IcTINnvs.
_ Fairly distributed over all the parts of the island visited.

4. CIRCUS ARUGINOSUS.

Numerous about the plains and swamps on both sides of

the island.

. CIRCUS CYANEUS.

re or three seen during the winter on the west side

the island.

6. OTUS BRACHYOTUS.
On April 17th saw one in the flesh that had just Beth shot
at Biguglia. No others seen or heard of.

7. CYPSELUS APUS.
Numerous after April 15th.

8. HiIrRUNDO RUSTICA.
: Very common after March 14th.

Ornithology of Corsica. 19

9. COTYLE RIPARIA.
Fairly numerous after the end of March.

10. CoryLe RUPESTRIS.

None noticed until the beginning of December; but after
that date numbers were seen on both the west and east coasts
and at Corte.

1]. CHELIDON URBICA.
Very common after March 14th.

12. ALCEDO ISPIDA.
A few seen on the sea-coast at Ajaccio in November, but
never noticed afterwards or elsewhere.

13. Merops saprastTer.

At Biguglia on April 30th and May Ist I noticed several
small parties of six or eight flying in a northerly direction.
None seemed to settle, though every now and then one would
halt in its flight as if with the intention of doing so. Once,
on firmg at the leading bird of a party of six, about fifty
yards up, they all halted for a few seconds straight over my
head, and then flew on as if nothing had happened, not alter-
ing their former course in the least.

14. Upurpa Epops.
First seen at the beginning of April, but nowhere numerous.

15. CertHIA FAMILIARIS.
A few seen in the large chestnut-groves at Corte on April
Sth, but observed nowhere else.

16. TRoGLODYTES PARVULUS.
Fairly common, but more so on the west than the east side
of the island.

17. CisTICOLA SCH@NICOLA.
- Numerous at Biguglia, but observed nowhere else.

18. CaLAMODYTA ARUNDINACEA (L.). :
The Great Sedge Warbler seems to occur but sparingly,
none being observed on the west side, and only four or five
on the east, three of which I shot, all proving to be males.
Og

20 Mr. C. Bygrave Wharton on the

19. CaALAMODYTA PHRAGMITIS.
Fairly numerous at Biguglia during April.

20. CALAMODYTA AQUATICA.
Several seen at Biguglia at the end of April, but by no
means so numerous as the preceding species.

21. CALAMODYTA MELANOPOGON.

I shot one in the Campo dell’ Oro, Ajaccio, on January 4th,
and another close to the same spot on the 7th. Unfortu-
nately my dog, having any thing but a tender mouth, and
reaching both birds before I could, completely spoiled them
for skinning, though there was enough left to send to Eng-
land to make sure of the identification. One or two others
were noticed in the vicinity ; but no one who has not tried
to shoot small marsh-frequenting Warblers can appreciate the
difficulty there is in getting far enough from your bird to
save cutting it all to pieces, and yet keep it in sight.

22. PoTAMODUS CETTII.
Very common in all the swamps on both sides of the
island. .

23. SYLVIA MELANOCEPHALA,
Common both in gardens and on the hills.

24. MELIzoPHILUS SARDUS.

This little Warbler is not uncommon in the low “ maquis”’
on the west coast; but it is most difficult to shoot, owing to
its creeping habits, only rising when you are close to it, and
almost instantly dropping again. ‘The only way I ever got a
specimen fit to skin was by making the dog range about
twenty yards ahead, and then making the most of my time
when the bird did show itself. The only one seen on the east
coast I shot at Bigugliaon April27th. Of its breeding-habits
I know nothing ; but, judging from the localities it frequents,
the nest must be most difficult to fintl, even more so than the
bird is to shoot. :

_ 25. CuRRUCA CINEREA.
Two seen at Biguglia in April were the only ones noticed.

Ornithology of Corsica. 21

26. CuRRUCA ATRICAPILLA.
First noticed on December 24th, several seen in January,
and fairly numerous afterwards.

27, PHYLLOSCOPUS SIBILATOR.
Several seen after April 10th.

28. PHyYLLoscorus TROCHILUS.

Fairly numerous after the beginning of April. None
noticed during the winter, though I was constantly on the
look-out for them. |

29. PHYLLOSCOPUS RUFUS.
Very numerous during the whole winter, but considerably
less so in April.

30. REGULUS IGNICAPILLUS.

By no means numerous, and the only species of Regulus
noticed. Two or three seen near Ajaccio in November, a few
near Cavro in January, and two near Bastia in March.

31. PHILOMELA LUSCINIA.
First noticed at Biguglia on March 16th, after which date
they were numerous.

32. RuTicILLA PH@NICURUS.
Several seen after April 10th, the date on which this species
was first noticed.

33. RUTICILLA TITYS.
A few seen in the neighbourhood of Ajaccio during the

winter, but none after February. This species does not ap-.

pear to breed in the island.

34. ERITHACUS RUBECULA.
Fairly numerous, and to be found both in gardens and on
the hills.

35. CYANECULA WOLFI.
- I saw one shot by Mr. W. Jesse at Bigughia on April 12th,
it being the only one noticed.

36. SAXICOLA @NANTHE.

First noticed at Corte on April 8th, after which date they
became numerous in all suitable localities.

22 Mr. C. Bygrave Wharton on the

7. PRATINCOLA RUBICOLA.
One of the commonest birds on the west side of the island,
but only a few seen on the east.

38. PRATINCOLA RUBETRA.
First noticed at Biguglia on April 17th, after which they
were fairly numerous.

39. ACCENTOR MODULARIS.

Probably more common than it appears, but, owing to its
habit of keeping in the low “ maquis” on the hills, and not
frequenting gardens or cultivated lands, is often overlooked.
All I saw were in the low cover on the hill-sides of the west
coast. None noticed on the east side of the island or at Corte.

40. PARUS MAJOR.
Common.

4]. PAaRUS ATER.

I shot two specimens of this Titmouse in the woods above
Cavro on January 13th; and they were the only ones noticed
in any part of the island.

42. Parus CHRULEUS.
Common, but less so than Parus major.

43. ACREDULA IRBII. ,

Scarce. A few seen near Ajaccio in November, and one
pair, evidently breeding, noticed in a large clump of thick
brambles near Biguglia on April 17th.

44. MovactLua ALBA.
Common during the winter, but none seen after March.

45, Bupytss ruava (L.).
Several seen during April; but I am unable to say for cer-
tain whether they breed in the island or not.

46. BupyTES CINEREOCAPILLA.
A few found at Biguglia in April, consorting with the pre-
vious species.

4.7. BUDYTES BOARULA.
Numerous during the winter on the shores of the Gulf of
Ajaccio, and found breeding along the small mountain-streams

Ornithology of Corsica. — 23

on the east coast in April. Two nests that I found (one on
the 21st, containing six eggs, and another on the 26th, con-
taining nearly fledged young) were both placed in most con+
spicuous positions, in the face of bare rocks come te the
stream.

48. ANTHUS TRIVIALIS.
Several seen on the east coast after April 10th, but none
noticed during the winter.

49, ANTHUS PRATENSIS.
Common and resident.

50. TurpDUS MUSICUS.

Excessively numerous during the winter; but by March
most seemed to have left, and none were seen in April or a
I think few, if any, remain tobreed.

51. Turpus ILiacws.

Only two seen. One I shot at Porto Pollo on the west
coast on February 6th; and the other I saw in the Ajaccio
market a few days afterwards.

52. TURDUS MERULA.

Very numerous during the winter; but the numbers de-
crease in March, though several remain and breed in the
island. This bird appears to breed considerably later in
Corsica than in England, the first nests (and those without
the full sompromenks of eggs) not being found till the middle
of April.

53. PETROCOSSYPHUS CYANUS.

A few seen in all parts of the island visited. During the
winter they were often to be found tied up with the Thrushes
and Blackbirds in the Ajaccio market. :

54. CINCLUS AQUATICUS.

I noticed a few Dippers on the mountain-streams on the east
coast ; but as I was unable to shoot a specimen, and so make
sure of the identification, the birds seen may have been
Cinclus albicollis. | .

24 Mr. C. Bygrave Wharton on the

55. ORIOLUS GALBULA.
Noticed large numbers (nearly all being males) at Biguglia
on April 27th, though but few were seen afterwards.

56. MuscicaPa GRISOLA.
Several seen on the east coast after April 20th,

57. Muscicapa ATRICAPILLA.
After April 13th this species was not uncommon in the
neighbourhood of Bastia and Biguglia.

58. Muscicapa COLLARIS.
I shot the only specimen of this bird seen, close to Bastia,
on April 10th.

59. LANIUS AURICULATUS.
1 shot the first seen at Sisco, on the east coast, on April
20th, after which date several were noticed.

60. GARRULUS GLANDARIUS.
Not uncommon on the east coast; none seen on the west.

61. Corvus corax.
Fairly common.

62. CoRvUS CORONE.
Scarce. Apparently a late breeder in Corsica; I watched
one in the act of building its nest on April 30th.

63. Corvus CORNIX.

Very common and resident. The first eggs were taken on
April 12th; and the nests seem always to be placed in low trees,
in or on the borders of swamps. ‘The Hoodie in Corsica is
a very wary bird, even leaving the nest before it is possible
to get within shot; he then generally watches operations from
the topmost branch of some neighbouring tree, but on the
slightest sign of approach moves off again to a safe distance.

64, STURNUS VULGARIS.
Not common, and only noticed in the months of February,
March, and April.

65. FRINGILLA CQALEBS.

One of the commonest birds in the island.

Cos

Ornithology of Corsica. 2

66. CARDUELUS ELEGANS.
Common and resident.

67. CHRYSOMITRIS CITRINELLA.

Only noticed during the winter, when they were to be
found congregating in flocks with Serin Finches, Linnets, and
Goldfinches.

68. SERINUS HORTULANUS.

Numerous during winter; and though all do not seem to
remain, numbers breed in the olive-groves. First eggs found
on April 10th.

69. LiguRINUS CHLORIS.
Not uncommon.

70. PyRGiTa PETRONIA.

For about a week at the end of December there were several
of these birds in the immediate neighbourhood of Ajaccio; but
I never saw them afterwards. On the 28th I shot two out of
one of my windows ; and all the time they stayed with us they
were exceptionally tame.

71. PASSER CISALPINUS.

The commonest bird in the island.

Though constantly on the look-out for Passer hispaniolensis,
I never noticed it.

72. Linora CANNABINA.
Common, but most so in the winter.

73. EMBERIZA CIRLUS.
Common ; but all those seen during winter do not seem to
remain to breed.

74, EMBERIZA HORTULANA.
A few seen at Biguglia on April 30th and May Ist.

75, EMBERIZA MILIARIA.
Common and resident.

76. EMBERIZA SCHENICLUS.
I shot the only one seen, on March 17th, at Biguglia.

26 Mr. C. Bygrave Wharton on the

77. ALAUDA ARVENSIS.

Not at all common during the autumn or early winter ;
very numerous in January, February, and March, but only a
few seen in April. I killed many Larks, in the hopes of find-
ing Galerita cristata; but the above and following species
were the only two seen.

78. ALAUDA ARBOREA.
Very numerous on the west coast all the time I was there,
but only a few seen on the east coast in April.

79. YUNX TORQUILLA.
Only two seen. One I shot near Ajaccio on November
23rd, and the other at Biguglia on April 15th.

80. CucULUS CANORUS.
None heard till April 21st; but after that date they were

fairly numerous.

81. CoLUMBA LIVIA.
On April 3rd I shot one of six disturbed from an old tower
on the west coast; and these were the only ones seen.

82. CoLUMBA PALUMBUS.
Not uncommon during the winter, but none noticed in the

spring.
83. TURTUR AURITUS.
Noticed several on and after April 27th.

84. CoTtuRNIX COMMUNIS.
Not many seen.

5. CaccaBIS RUBRA.
Common during winter, but apparently less so in spring.

86. VANELLUS VULGARIS.
Fairly numerous during the winter.

87. ANGIALITIS HIATICULA.

I only noticed this bird twice. On April 22nd I put up four
on a river near Biguglia, and on the 30th saw four (possibly
the same birds) on the borders of the lake. On each occasion
they were very shy.

Ornithology of Corsica. 27

88. ARDEA CINEREA.
A few seen in the marshes on both sides of the sale

89. HERoOpIAS ALBA.
One seen at Biguglia on April 30th.

90. ARDEOLA COMATA,
On May 17th I saw one in the flesh that had been shot at
Biguglia on the 15th. )

91. ARDETTA MINUTA.
The only one seen was a live specimen that had been taken
in the neighbourhood of Bastia about the middle of April.

92. BorauRUS STELLARIS.
By no means common. The only two seen were shot by
myself at Bigugla on March 17th, and were both females.

93. 'ToTANUS OCHROPUS.
A few seen and one shot at Bigugha in April.

94. ACTITIS HYPOLEUCA.
A few seen along the shore at Ajaccio during the winter,
and a pair seen near Biguglia on April 22nd.

95. GALLINAGO MEDIA.
Numerous during the winter, a few seen on the west coast
in March, and two seen at Biguglia in the middle of April.

96. GALLINAGO GALLINULA.
Only a few seen.

97. ScoLOPAX RUSTICOLA.
By no means numerous on the west coast, but, I believe,
common on the east.

98. RALLUS AQUATICUS.
Seen on both sides of the island, but does not appear to be
numerous.

99. OrRTYGOMETRA PORZANA.
Noticed on both coasts in March and April.

100. GALLINULA CHLOROPUS.
Two seen at Biguglia in April were all I noticed.

28 On the Ornithology of Corsica.

101. Fuxica ara.
Thousands on the lakes on the east coast during winter,
numbers remaining to breed. None seen on the west coast.

102. Manreca PENELOPE.

The only one seen on the west coast was a male that had just
been shot in the Campo dell’ Oro, Ajaccio, on March 27th.

Except by shooting them, it is exceedingly difficult to make
out for certain the different species of Anatidee that swarm on
the east-coast lakes in winter; and as I was unfortunate
enough never to be at Bastia at the time of any of the large
drives, I was able to identify but few Ducks.

103. ANAS BOSCHAS.
Common on the east coast, where numbers remain and

breed.

104. QUERQUEDULA CIRCIA.
I shot the only one seen in the Campo dell’ Oro on January
26th.

105. QuERQUEDULA CRECCA.
Not many noticed.

106. FULIGULA CRISTATA.

Thousands on the lakes on the east coast in winter; and
numbers were still there at the end of April. None seen on
the west. :

107. ERISMATURA LEUCOCEPHALA.
The only one seen was on Lake Biguglia on March 8th, in
company with innumerable Coots, Tufted Ducks, &e.

108. Mereus sERRATOR.

Only one seen; and the shooting of this was lucky, to say
the least of it. On the morning of December 4th I noticed
on the gulf at Ajaccio two birds (this and a Shag) swimming
about twenty yards apart, right in front of my window (my
house was a little distance out of the town, and had only a
road between it and the sea) ; so, loading my sporting-rifle,
and putting up the 300-yards sight, I let go the right barrel
at this bird, not knowing for certain at the time what the

Contributions to the Ornithology of Borneo. 29

species was; the bullet carried away the back part of the
head, and naturally laid the bird motionless. The Shag, on
hearing the shot, instead of leaving, as he should have done,
merely raised himself in the water and flapped his wings ;
instantly I let him have the contents of the left barrel, the
bullet cutting the back-bone about four inches from the tail,
and throwing the bird backwards completely out of the water.
Sending one of the servants to hail a fishing-boat that was
fortunately near, within ten minutes from first seeing these
two birds they were both lying on my table. During the day
the birds, which were of course spoilt for preserving by the
bullets, were seen by the Consul and one or two other English
friends; but I am afraid such a lucky right-and-left with a
rifie occurs but once in a lifetime.

109. PopicEPS NIGRICOLLIS.

I noticed a few on the lakes on the east coast in March, but
none in April. °

110. Larus canus.

Fairly numerous.

111. Larus LEUCOPHAUS.
Not uncommon.

112. Larus RIDIBUNDUS.
Numerous.

113. PHALACROCORAX CRISTATUS.
Several seen on the west coast during the winter.

V.— Contributions to the Ornithology of Borneo.—Part I.
By R. Bowpzier Suarre.

(Plate II.)

I am indebted to the kindness of Mr. Arthur Everett for the
collection of birds which I have the pleasure of describing in
the present paper. Mr. Everett is well known as the dis-
cover of the beautiful Pitta arcuata, described a few years

ago by Mr. Gould (Ann. N. H. (4) vil. p. 340), and figured

30 Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Contributions to the

by him in the ‘ Birds of Asia’ (part xxiv.) ; he is also known
as the collector of a series of birds from the district of Sa-
rawak, described by Lord Walden (Ibis, 1872, p. 860). The
present consignment is also from the same part of the island,
most of the birds being from the immediate neighbourhood
of Sarawak. Sibu Island and the Matu river are situated
in the northern part of the Brunna district, the former bemg
some little way up the Bruit river. Although many of the
species now recorded have been already mentioned by Lord
Walden, I have imcluded them in the present paper for the
sake of the excellent notes as to the coloration of the soft
parts &c. for which Mr. Everett’s collections are always so
favourably distinguished. It is to be hoped that his ex-
ertions will be continued, as there remains a vast amount
of ornithological work to be done in Borneo, and even a small
consignment like the present adds several species to the avi-
fauna of the island. JI must not conclude these introductory
remarks without acknowledging the great assistance I have
- derived from Count Salvadori’s work on the ornithology of
Borneo, as is evidenced by the frequent references to it in
the following pages :— ‘

1. Circus sprtonotus, Kaup; Sharpe, Cat. B. i. p. 58.

a. No. 160. Sibu. Ins bright yellow; legs greenish
yellow.

6. Sibu, Dec. 15th, 1874.

As hitherto no Harrier had been found in the island, this
must be considered an interesting addition to the avifauna of
Borneo, if I am correct in referring the species to (. spilo-
notus, and not to C. eruginosus. The birds are both young,
and are in the brown plumage with whitish heads which
usually distinguish immature Marsh-Harriers; they are ap-
parently male and female, and measure as follows :—

a. Total length 20 inches, wing 15:6, tail 9°7, tarsus 3°5.

6. Total length 23 inches, wing 16:6, tail 10°0, tarsus 3°7.

It is quite certain that some time must elapse before the
Harriers will be understood by ornithologists ; and at present
every fresh specimen examined by me seems to present in-

Ornithology of Borneo. - } 31

creased difficulties. I have, however, re-examined the Marsh-
Harriers in the Museum collection, and I find that a com-
parison of measurements between C. spilonotus and e@erugi-
nosus gives the following result :—

Wing. Tarsus.
inches. inches.
Ce SPUR ORNS BOF ip ce ends oe ae oss 15:5-16:0 3°45-3'6
- a tr ok asthe seat 155 31
OS TE a eee een 15°7-16:1 3'4-3°6
+ Ae aisrecighhe atc permet 15°45-16°8 3°35-3'6

As undoubtedly adult specimens of both species are here.
measured, it is evident that dimensions will not help much in
the determination of the species, and although in their adult
stages they are widely different, in their young plumages they
are scarcely distinguishable: if this supposition be correct,
the chances are that the bird identified by me as C. erugi-
nosus from the Philippines, on the authority of which Lord
Walden included the species as an inhabitant of that archi-
pelago, is really nothing but the young of C. spilonotus ; and
in this case it is possible that some of the young Harriers
from China and Formosa belong to the latter bird and not to
C. eruginosus. The fact is, that the plumages of the Philip-
pine-Islands bird have never been properly worked out; and
until this has been done, it is impossible to do more than
guess at the truth. We may, however, learn something by
analogy from its nearest ally, C. maillardi; and as it is now
pretty clear that this species has at least three very distinct
plumages, so we may fairly credit C. spilonotus with a brown
immature dress, as in the Réunion species.

The male of C. spilonotus is a very handsome bird with
white under surface and black-streaked breast. The plumage
of the female is probably correctly described in the ‘ Cata-
logue’ (J. c.) ; and that the young male also goes through a
stage very similar to’the old female, is pretty clear from the
remains of such moultings on the maturing birds: both wing
and tail are barred; and it is evident that these bars are gra-
dually dissolved as the bird becomes adult. As far as I can
see at present, there is no gradual change from the white-

32 _ Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Contributions to the

headed brown dress to the female plumage ; and this stage 1s
therefore probably assumed by a moult.

2. Astur TrivircATus (Temm.) ; Salvad. /.c. p. 17.

a. No.12. 92. Sibu, June 12,1874. Iris bright orange ;
legs yellow.

b. g. Sibu, Aug. 1874. Iiis chrome; legs and feet ochre-
ous; bill black, the base greenish yellow; lores greenish yel-
low. ‘Draco volans in gizzard.”

The male is in younger plumage than the female, though
“neither are very old, and a corresponding difference in the
soft parts is to be noted.

3. SprLoRNis PALLIDUS, Walden; Sharpe, Cat. B.1. p. 290,
Dl otk

Spilornis bacha (Daud.); Salvad. 1. c. p. 7.

a. No.19. ¢g. Sibu, Nov. 1874. Iris chrome-yellow ;
legs dirty ochre; bill dark leaden; ‘“ antorbital patch to cere
brownish yellow-orange.”

4, Haiastur INTERMEDIUS, Gurn.; Sharpe, Cat. B. 1.
p. 314.

Haliastur indus (Bodd.) ; Salvad. J. c. p. 12.

a. “No. 158. @. Sibu Island, April 28, 1874. Inis
dark chocolate; feet pale greenish yellow; bill black.”

The specimen sent is in immature plumage.

5. MicroHierax FRINGILLARIUS (Drap.); Sharpe, Cat. B.
1. p. 868.

Mierax cerulescens, Salvad. 1. c. p. 3. |

a,b,c. No.196. @. Sibu,July 1874. “Tris chocolate.” —

The three specimens sent by Mr. Everett are apparently
all rather young, as they have the forehead, cheeks, and eye-
brow stained with orange.

6. Poxioartus numixis (Mull. & Schl.) ; Salvad. J. c. p. 6.

a. “No. 157. g. Sibu, Aug. 14,1874. Iris bright yel-.
low ; feet and tarsi pale blue.”

This is a very interesting occurrence, as Count Salvadori
first included the species in his work on the probability of its
occurring in Borneo, as it had been found in the neighbour-

Ornithology of Borneo. 30

ing islands. In a note at the end of the volume he refers to
a skeleton of a bird of this genus with more certainty as being
P. humilis; and the correctness of this view is now borne out
by the skin sent by Mr. Everett.

7. Macrorreryx comatus (Temm.) ; Walden, Tr. Z. S.
ix pelos:

Dendrochelidon comata, Salvad. 1. c. p. 123.

a,b. “No.101. $,2. Sibu, Sept. 1873. Iris chocolate.”

The pair sent agree with Sumatran examples, and have,
like the latter, the wing shorter than Philippine birds, as
duly noted by Lord Walden (/.c.). I cannot, however, per-
ceive any material difference in plumage.

8. MAcROPTERYX LONGIPENNIS.

Dendrochelidon longipennis (Rafin.) ; Salvad. J. c. p. 122.
a. “No. 100. ¢. Jambusan, Sept. 1874. Iris cho-
colate.”

9. Meroprs sicotor (Bodd.) ; Salvad. /. c. p. 90.

a. “No. 86. 9. Bruit Sands, August 1873.”

6. “9. Bruit, April 20, 1874. Iris dragon’s-blood; bill
black; feet blackish.”

The female has the chestnut of the upper surface washed
with green, as is so often seen in other Bee-eaters, espe-
cially in M. superciliosus of Africa. For this mixture of plu-
mage I have never yet seen any satisfactory explanation.

10. PELARGOPSIS LEUCOCEPHALA (Gm.); Sharpe, Monogr. |
Aleed. pl. 31; Salvad. /. c. p. 95.

a. “No. 102. Sibu, June 1874. Iris chocolate; bill and
feet coral-red.” :

Of the ordinary Bornean type, as distinguished by me in
my ‘ Monograph.’

11. Hancyon pieata (Bodd.); Sharpe, Monogr. Alced.
pl. 62.

Entomobia pileata, Salvad. 1. c. p. 102.

“No. 94. ¢,92. Sibu, Nov. 15, 1873. Iris chocolate ;
legs and bill scarlet.”’ |

SER, III.—VOL. VI. D

o4 Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Contributions to the

12. Evpynamis Matayana (Cab. & Heine); Salvad. /. ec.
p. 68.

a. “No. 142. @. Sibu, Dec. 1873. Iris brick-red; bill
greenish ; legs lead-grey.”

b. “8. Sibu, Nov. 1873. Iris crimson; bill greenish lead ;
legs lead-grey.”

Both these specimens seem to be changing their plumage,
the bird killed in November being in full dress, excepting
some rufous brown bars at the tips of the tail-feathers, while
the other male specimen is in full moult.

13. RurnorrHa cHLoRoPpH#@A (Rafil.); Salvad. /. c. p. 69.

a. “No.29. ¢. Jambusan, Sept. 10,1874. Iris choco-
colate; bill pure whitish green, the orbital patch similarly
coloured ; legs pale leaden.”

6.“ g. Sibu, July. Iris chocolate; cere pale green.”

The male (so marked by Mr. Everett) is the chestnut-
headed bird, and the female the grey-headed, thus confirming
the determinations of the Marquis Doria. All the speci-
mens dissected by Mr. Wallace likewise agree.

14. Cenrrococcyx savanensis (Dum.); Salvad. J. c. p. 76.
a. “No. 52. Sibu. Iris crimson; legs dark lead.”

15. CacoManTIs MERULINUS (Scop.); Salvad. /. c. p. 64.

a,b. “No. 89. g. Sibu Island, April 25 and 28, 1874.
Iris pale carmine; bill dark brown; feet reddish.” 3

Mr. Motley’s Banjermassing specimen, determined by Dr.
Sclater as C. sepulchratis (Miull.), is in the Museum, and is
referable to the above species, as Count Salvadori suspected
it would be. It has the throat’ a little tinged with rufous ;
this, however, appears to be a variable character, as it exists
in one of the Sibu skins and not in the other.

16. CatonHampHus FuLiciInosus (Temm.); Salvad. 1. c.
p. 39.
a,b. “No. 25. g,9. Jambusan, Sept. 11, 1874. Iris
brownish ochre; bill black; legs coral-red. Fruit in the
gizzard.”

Fully shows the red colour which induced the Messrs.

Ornithology of Borneo. 35

Marshall to keep the Bornean bird distinct from C. hayi of
Malacca. The female is precisely like the male.

17. MEGALEMA MYSTACOPHONUS.

Chotorea mystacophonus (Temm.); Salvad. J.c. p. 34, t. 1.

a, b,c. “No. 33. 92. Jambusan, Sept. 12, 1874. - Iris
chocolate ; legs greenish.”

d.‘°g. Jambusan, Sept. 9, 1874.”

Three specimens now sent by Mr. Everett are in the
state of plumage described by the Messrs. Marshall as M.
humii. They are all different one from the other, but show
pretty conclusively that the last-named species cannot be up-
held. The five figures given in Count Salvadori’s work prove
this also; and Mr. Everett’s specimens show the gradual trans-
ition from green- to bright-plumaged birds. At the same
time he has also sent a full-plumaged male example, killed in
the same locality ; and I do not think there can be the shghtest
doubt as:to the absolute identity of M. hum with M. mys-
tacophonus.

18. MrcGaL®MA VERSICOLOR.

Chotorea versicolor (Rafil.) ; Salvad. l.c. p. 33.

a. “No.75. ¢. Kucking, August 1874. Iris cho-
eolate.”’

b. “2. Jambusan, Sept. 11, 1874. Iris chocolate ; legs
pale greenish.”

19. MeGaLe#MA DUVAUCELI.

Xantholema duvauceli (Less.) ; Salvad. J. c. p. 38.

a. “No.11l. ¢. Jambusan, Sept. 12, 1874. Iris cho-
colate; legs greenish.”

20. CaLLoLopHuUS MALACCENSIS (Lath.) ; Salvad. J. c.
p. 50. |
ae INO AOA 9 ts OADM it

b. “9. Matu, August 1873.”

But little difference is to be seen in the sexes, according to
the two specimens now sent. The bars on the back are much
more distinct in the female; but this may be partly due to
the worn plumage of the male bird.

36 | Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Contributions to the

21. CaLLoLtopHus puniceus (Horsf.) ; Salvad. J. c. p. 49.

a. “No. 14. @. Kucking, August 30, 1874. Iris crim-
son; feet dirty green; maxilla blackish brown; mandible
chrome-yellow ; bare space about the eye pale blue.”

This specimen is apparently either immature or in worn
plumage; for the head is earthy brown, with the red feathers
appearing here and there.

22. Meterypres rristis (Horsf.) ; Salvad. J. c. p. 56.

a,b. “No.24. g. Jambusan, Sept. 12,1874. Iris crimson.”

ce. 9. “Sibu, July 1874.”

There is considerable difference in the amount of barring
on the breast in the two males, showing that this is a variable
character.

23. Mericrypres tuKxi (Less.) ; Salvad. J. c. p. 57.

a. “No.66. ¢. Jambusan, Sept.16, 1874. Iris crimson ;
bill black, mandible whitish ; legs dark olive-brown.”

Agrees tolerably well with Malaccan and Sumatran ex-
amples (Wallace), but is not so rufescent as the specimens
recorded by me from Labuan (P. Z. 8. 1875, p..103).

24, XYLOLEPES VALIDUS (Temm.); Salvad. J. c. p. 43.
a. “No. 96. 92. Jambusan.”

25. Loricutus eateuLus (L.); Salvad. /. c. p. 26.
a.“ @. Sibu, Jan. 19, 1875. Iris chocolate.”
b. “2. Sibu. Iris chocolate; legs greenish brown.”

26: CoPsYCHUS PROBLEMATICUS, Sp. n.

C. chalybeo-niger: tectricibus alarum et secundariis inter-
mediis extis albis : gutture et pectore superiore chalybeo-
nigris: corpore reliquo subtus albo, hypochondriis cine-
reis : alis ut in speciebus reliquais picturatis : rectricibus
sex intermediis nigris, proxima albé, pogonio interno ob-
liqué nigro notato, duabus reliquis albis versus basin po-
gonil interni nigris: subalaribus nigris, quibusdam an-
guste albo terminatis.

“No. 82. ¢. Sibu. Iris chocolate.”
I cannot unite this species to C. saularis. I have carefully
examined our series of the above bird; and I consider that

one species alone inhabits the peninsula of India, ranging

Ornithology of Borneo. oF

into China, and down the Malayan peninsula, all the speci-
mens from Northern India being rather paler in colour, espe-
cially as females.

Great variation in size exists, and this alone would not
serve to separate species of this genus: thus the tarsus varies
from 1:05 to 1:2 inch, being, however, generally smaller in
the hen birds. A Burmese female has it 1:15 inch in length.
The wing varies from 3°75 to 4 inches in the male, and from
3°65 to 3°8 in the female, the example from Burmah measur-
ing only 3°35 in the wing, and 3 inches in the tail.

I am not disposed to separate the Malaccan species (usually,
though erroneously, called C. mindanensis ; cf. Walden, Tr. Z.
S. ix. p. 194) from C. saularis. The amount of white on
the third pair of rectrices is a character which must be re-
ceived with a great deal of caution, as it increases with age.
This is certainly the case with C. sauwlaris, and, I doubt not,
with the allied species also; and I have examined Malaccan
examples which have the same tail-markings as Indian birds.
Then, again, with regard to the dark coloration of the Ma-
laccan females, this is certainly noteworthy to a certain extent ;
but a Madras female in the Museum is quite as dark: the
birds from Northern India and Burmah seem paler.

Of the Andaman species I am only able to judge by a single
female in the Museum; and this bird is apparently different
on account of its rufescent flanks. Mr. Hume separates the
bird from this locality as C. andamanensis ; and in this he is
probably right. |

The Javan C. amenus is distinguished by its grey under
surface in the female, the male being entirely blackish below.
It is represented in the Museum by specimens from W. Java
(Wallace), Bali (Wallace), Labuan (Low), and Banjermassing
(Motley). The Bali bird is glossy black on the under surface,
and has no admixture of grey like the Javan and Bornean skins.

Lastly, Mr. Everett’s Sibu skin remains; and its specific
characters may be shortly summed up as follows :—Similis
C. saulari, sed tectricibus alarum inferioribus nigris, vix albo
angusté limbatis distinguendus. Long. tot. 8°6, ale 4°05.
caudez 3°8, tarsi 1°25.

———— =

38 Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Contributions to the

A specimen from W. Java is also in the Museum, obtained
by Mr. Wallace, and marked by him C. mindanensis, showing
that he regarded it as identical with the Malaccan bird, and
distinct from C. amenus. The female is rather light grey,
the flanks strongly washed with fulvous brown. Whether
this bird is only a stage of C. amenus, or a distinct species,
remains to be proved.

The true C. mindanensis from the Philippines is a very dif-
ferent bird with wholly black tail.

27. TRACHYCOMUS OCHROCEPHALUS (Gm.); Salvad. J. ¢.
p- 196.
“No. 74. Sibu.”

28. PycNONOTUS EUPTILOTIS.

“@. Sibu, July 10, 1874, Iris pale eadiale legs brown ;
bill diel brown.”

b. “No. 161. Jambusan.”’

The above birds agree with three others in the Museum,
determined respectively as Jole tympanistrigus (Mill.), ex
Malacca (Wallace), Pycnonotus euptilotis (J. & S.), ex Java,
Pycnonotus susanii (Miull.), ex Borneo.

It is evident therefore that great confusion in nomenclature
exists here.

29. Pycnonotus pLuMmosus, Blyth; Salvad. J. c. p. 198.
a.“*§. Jambusan, Sept. 18,1874. Bill black; legs dark
brown; iris crimson.”

30. PYCNONOTUS ANALIS.

Pycnonotus analis (Horsf.) ; Salvad. 7. c. p. 197.

“No. 164. g. Sibu, 1874. Iris chocolate ; bill and legs
black. Fruit in gizzard.”

I am by no means certain that Philippine examples, P.
gotavier (Scop.), are really distinct from the Malaccan and
Bornean bird ; fora Malaccan skin in the British Museum has
the ear-coverts nearly as dark as in a Philippine bird.

31. Pycnonorus pusituus, Salvad. J. c. p. 200.
a. “No. 18. 3d. Puak, Upper Sarawak. Iris reddish
orange; legs ight brown.”

Ornithology of Borneo. 39

This specimen appears to agree with Count Salvadori’s de-
scription. Other specimens are in the Museum from Borneo,
but to which no title had been affixed by Mr. George Gray.

32. BRACHYPODIUS IMMACULATUS, Sp. nl.

Brachypodius melanocephalus (Gm.); Salvad. 1. c. p. 201.

a. “No. 43. ¢. Sibu. Iris cobalt-blue.”

This species is evidently rare in Borneo, as it has only
occurred once at Sarawak to the Marquis Doria. Count Sal-
vadori knows of no other instance of its capture, and refers
the Sarawak skin to B. melanocephalus. J find, on compa-
rison, that Mr. Everett’s specimen agrees best with Sumatran
examples in the Museum; and these I am induced to consider
distinct from the Malaccan species, 3. e. the true B. melano-
cephalus, as none of the latter shows the outer tail-feathers
entirely yellow, as the Sumatran bird does. The Sibu skin
now sent is probably a young bird, as it has the back dull
olive-green ; but it has scarcely any trace of a dark shade on
the outer feather, and is nearly as bright yellow as the Su-
matran skins. I therefore propose to separate the latter as
a distinct species.

Adult. General colour above yellowish green, more or less
inclining to olive, the lower back and rump mottled with
black, the bases to the feathers being of the latter colour, the
tips yellow; upper tail-coverts bright lemon-yellow ; crown,
sides of head, and entire throat shining green, slightly washed
with purple under certain lights; breast olive-green, gradually ~
shading off into bright yellow on the abdomen, flanks, and
under tail-coverts ; under wing-coverts pale yellow; upper
wing-coverts olive-green, the greater series brighter and more
yellow; bastard wing, primary-coverts, and primaries dark
sepia-brown, very narrowly bordered with olive-green, the
secondaries blackish on the mner web, bright yellow on the
outer ; tail bright yellow, shading off about the middle of the
feather into olive-green, and thence mto black, the latter
forming an irregular subterminal spot before a brilliant yel-
low tip, this dark shading becoming gradually imperceptible
on the outer feathers, which are consequently entirely yel-

40 Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Contributions to the

low; bill and feet blackish. Total length 6:2 inches, culmen
‘6, wing 3°05, tail 2°8, tarsus ‘6. (Sumatra, Wallace.)

Javan specimens collected by Mr. Wallace agree with the
Malaccan rather than with the Sumatran skins; and Tenas-
serim birds are, as might be expected, the same as the Ma-
layan. I may mention that, of the ordinary B. melanoce-
phalus, I have had before me no less than twelve skins for
the purpose of comparison.

33. PuyLuorNis cyANopogon, Temm.; Salvad. J. c. p. 194.

a. “No. 78. ¢. Sibu, August1874. Iris chocolate-brown;
bill black ; legs light green.” 7

6. “Jambusan, Sept. 1874. Iris chocolate; bill and legs
black.” |

The difference in the colour of the legs is noticeable, as I
can perceive but little difference in the actual specimens, ex-
cept that the black-legged bird is rather duller in plumage,
and has a few green feathers in the black of the cheeks, and
one green plume in the middle of the left cheek-spot.

34. Tone oxivacea, Blyth; Salvad. J. c. p. 210.
a. “No. ll. og. Jambusan, Sept. 13,1874. Iris white ;

bill black, mandible dirty lead-colour ; legs light warm brown.

Fruit and insects in gizzard. Shot in old jungle by road-side.
Not breeding.”

350. CRINIGER PHZOCEPHALUS (Hartl.) ; Salvad. /.c. p. 207.

a. “No. 162. do. Jambusan, Sept. 10, 1874. Iris pale
orange-brown ; legs and feet pale transparent brown.”

36. BRAcCHYPTERYX MALACCENSIS, Hartl.; Salvad. J. ¢.
p. 222.

a.“*?. Kucking, August 1874. Iris dark crimson.”

37. Macronvs prinosus (Jard. & Selb.) ; Salvad. /.c. p. 216.

a. “No. 185. @. Jambusan, Sept. 10, 1874. Iris
crimson.”

38. CYANODERMA BicoLoR (Blyth) ; Sharpe, P. Z. S. 1875,
p. 105.

Cyanoderma erythropterum, Salvad. /. c. p. 218.

One specimen, without indication of the exact locality. -

This. 1876.P1. IL

| J.GKeulemans del. Mrntern Bros, imp.

1. ORTHOTOMUS BORNEONENSIS.
2. CALAMODYTA DORIA.

Ornithology of Borneo. 4.1

39. HERPORNIS BRUNNESCENS, Sp. 0.

3. H. affinis H. xantholeuce, sed magis brunnescens nec vi-
ridis; loris et facie laterali omnino cinerascentibus di-
stinguenda. Long. -tot. 4°8 unc., culm. ‘55, ale 2:7,
caudee 1°9, tarsi °65.

A single specimen of this undoubtedly new Herpornis was
obtained at Sarawak by Mr. Wallace, and was named by him
H. xantholeuca. It is, however, certainly distinct from that
species, being of an olive-brown colour above, shading into
green on the rump and tail; the lores and sides of the face
also are entirely ashy brown, whereas in H. xantholeuca they
are white, shaded with ashy grey; the tinge of colour on the
chest and sides of the body is not grey, but brown, in the
Sarawak bird. No species of Herpornis has been before re-
corded from Borneo; and the genus is not included in Count
Salvadori’s work.

40. ORTHOTOMUS BORNEONENSIS. (Plate II. fig. 1.)

Orthotomus borneonensis, Salvad. Ucc. Born. p. 247.

“No. 3. 3. Jambusan, Sept. 18,1874. Iris Naples yel-
low; bill horn-brown; legs pale warm brown.”

Agrees very well with Count Salvadori’s description, all the
differences alluded to by him as existing between the Bornean
species and O. sepium of Java holding good in Mr. Everett’s
specimen.

41, CaLaMopytTa pori#. (Plate II. fig. 2.) |

Calamodyta doria, Salvad, Atti R. Accad. Se. Tr. iii. p.
531; id. Ucc. Born. p. 250.

“No. 21. o? Sibu, Nov. 21, 1874. Iris sepia-brown ;
legs white ; bill dark brown, mandible ochraceous.”

The single specimen sent by Mr. Everett agrees very fairly
with Count Salvadori’s description, excepting that the super-
ciliary streak is olivaceous brown, of the same colour as the
breast and sides of the body; the cheeks also show traces of
| triangular dusky spots.

42, AcROCEPHALUS ORIENTALIS,

Acrocephalus orientalis (T. & 8.) ; Salvad. J. c. p. 251.

“No. 209. ¢. Sibu Island, April 27, 1874. Iris pale
umber-brown ; legs greenish lead-colour ; bill blackish.”

4.2 Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Contributions to the

The above ‘specimen is more striped on the breast than
are ordinary examples, the bird most approaching this Bor-
nean specimen being one collected by Mr. Cuming in the
Philippines ; all the others in the Museum are more or less
uniform.

43. Henicurus ruricapitius (Temm.); Elwes, Ibis, 1872,
p- 207.

a. “No. 16. o&. Puak Hill, Sept. 14,1874. Iris choco-
late ; bill black; legs pmkish white. Not breeding.”

This is a very interesting addition to the avifauna of Bor-
neo. Having compared this specimen with Temminck’s
plate, I came to the conclusion that it agreed ; but the figure
does no justice to the beauty of the species.

44, ANTHREPTES MALACCENSIS (Scop.) ; Salvad. /. c. p.178.

a. “No.48. o. Sibu, Jan.7,1875. Iris brick-red; legs
greenish.”

6.9. Sibu, Jan. 16,1874. Iris brown; legs greenish.”

Another female killed in January is described as having
the iris “ brick-red ;” so that specimen 6 is doubtless a young
bird. This is also apparent from the bill, which is pale
brown instead of blackish.

45, AirHopyea EUPOGON, Cab.; Salvad. J. c. p. 173.
a. “No. 104. ¢. Sibu, Jan. 18, 1875. Iris chocolate.”
b. “9. Matu Beach, May 8,1874. Iris dark chocolate.”

46. Dicwum TRiIGgoNosTIGMA (Scop.) ; Salvad. J. c. p. 166.

a. “No. 204. og. Jambusan, Sept. 16,1874. Iris raw
sienna; bill black; legs dark leaden colour. Pairing.”

6. “3s. Jambusan, Sept. 10,1874. Iris grey-brown; legs
brown.”

The second specimen is a young male, which I have had con-
siderable difficulty in determining. Mr. Wallace obtained
a similar male bird in Malacca, but did not identify the
species; moreover I have never seen an authentic female of
this Diceum. I have, however, been enabled to determine
a female Malaccan bird in the British Museum from Count
Salvadori’s description, and I therefore characterize this sex as
follows :—

Ornithology of Borneo. 43

2 mari omnino dissimilis: olivaceo-viridis, uropygio et su-
pracaudalibus flavicantibus: rectricibus et remigibus
brunneis, secundariis olivaceo-viridi limbatis: subtus vi-
rescenti-cinerea, guld vix albicante : abdomine medio et
supracaudalibus leteé flavis. 3

3 juv. similis feminz adultz, sed ubique saturatior: rectri-
tricibus nigris: remigibus nigris, primariis pulchré cine-
reo, secundariis flavicanti-olivaceo limbatis: subtus fla-
vicans, gutture et pectore superiore vix cinereo lavatis ;
abdomine leetiore, flavo.

47. PRioNocHILUS MACULATUS (Temm.); Salvad. J. c. p. 164.

a. “No. 92. 2. Jambusan, Sept. 10,1874. Iris crimson;
bill black.”

It was, of course, as Count Salvadori remarks, an error of
Blyth’s to suppose this species to be the female of P. thora-
cicus; and as the hen bird of P. maculatus is yet unde-
scribed, we have to thank Mr. Everett for its discovery. We
have also in the British Museum a pair collected by Mr. |
Wallace at Sarawak; and by him the sexes have been cor-
rectly determined; so that we have additional security re-
specting the identity of the hen bird, which may be charac-
terized simply as follows :—

@ mari persimilis, sed plagd verticali flava nec aurantiaco-
rubra distinguenda. -

48. Hrrunpo savanica, Sparrm.; Salvad. /. c. p. 126.

a,b,c. “No. 85. o,2. Sibu, Oct. 20,1874. Iris dark
brown.”

49. PHILENTOMA PyRRHOPTERUM (Temm.); Salvad. J. c¢.
p. 188.

a. “No.10. 9. Sibu, August 1874. Iris bright brown ;
legs pale leaden ; bill dark horn-colour.”

50. ALSEONAX LATIROSTRIS (Raffl.); Salvad. J. c. p. 129.

a.“ ¢. Kucking, Oct. 8, 1874. Iris chocolate ; legs dark
vandyke-brown.” .

51. Lanius Lucionensis, L.

Lanius schwanerti, Bp.? Salvad. /. c. p. 159.

a.“d. Sibu, Nov. 20, 1873. Bill black ; legs dark lead-
colour ; iris chocolate.”

4A, Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Contributions to the

The acquisition of this specimen will, I trust, extinguish
Bonaparte’s L. schwaneri as a species; for I have carefully
compared Mr. Everett’s bird with a series of L. lucionensis,
lent me by Mr. Swinhoe, and there cannot be any doubt as
to their complete identity. Count Salvadori and Mr. Swinhoe
have both expressed their belief that this would be the case.

52. IRENA TURCOSA.

Irena cyanea (Begbie) ; Salvad. J. ¢. p. 151.

a. “Sibu. Iris red.”

b. “No. 45. gd. Jambusan, Sept. 11, 1874. Iris fiery
orange-red.”

The latter specimen is somewhat immature, as is evidenced
by the remains of a few green plumes on the abdomen; the
mixture of orange-colour in the iris, as noted by Mr. Everett,
is also a probable sign of immaturity.

With reference to the different species of Jrena Lord Wal-
den’s excellent remarks (Ibis, 1871, p. 171) should be studied.
At present four species are known, viz.:—1. I. cyanogastra,
Vig., from the Philippines; 2. I. turcosa, Walden, from Java ;
3. L. puella (Lath.), from Malabar; 4. I. cyanea (Begbie), from
Malacca. The length of the tail-coverts is a distinguishing
feature in these birds; but as Count Salvadori notices a ten-
dency to vary in this respect, I have examined the series of
skins in the British Museum with a view to test the stability
of this character.

Travancore (Capt. Biddulph). Both upper and under tail-
coverts short, not reaching within 14 inch of tip of tail; three
of the inner greater wing-coverts tipped with blue.

Tenasserim (J. D. C. Packman). Two specimens agreeing
with the foregoing example, resembling it in size, length of
under tail-coverts, and in having large blue tips to the three
innermost greater coverts.

Siam (Mouhot). This bird seems a little deeper in colour,
but is otherwise the same as the Indian species ; four greater
coverts tipped with blue.

All the above are referable to I. puedla.

Malacca (Wallace). The tail-coverts are here very much
longer, but do not come within half an inch of the tip of the

Ornithology of Borneo. 45

tail; only two of the inner greater coverts have the blue spots
*at the tip.

Two other specimens from Malacca are precisely similar.

Sumatra (Wallace). The male has the under tail-coverts
reaching to the end of the tail itself. No blue spots on the
imner greater coverts.

Borneo. A specimen presented by Rajah Brooke has the
tail-coverts reaching to the tip of the tail, and agrees both in
this respect and in the absence of blue spots on the coverts.

Banjermassing (Motley). Agrees with the foregoing ex-
ample in both respects.

Lastly, both Mr. Everett’s birds have the long tail-coverts,
but show a small blue spot on the innermost coverts.

Of course nothing but adult males have been compared.
I have little hesitation in keeping the Sumatran and Bor-
nean birds distinct from the Malaccan; but the question
now to be settled is their identity with the Javan Jrena tur-
cosa of Walden.

53. CHApria MALAYANA, Hay; Salvad. J. c. p. 153.
a. “No.17. &. Jambusan, Sept. 15, 1874. Iris dark
blood-red ; bill and feet black.”

54. DissemMuRUs BRAcHyPHORUS (Temm.) ; Salvad. J. c¢.
p. 154.
a. “No.5. o. Sibu. Iris crimson.”

55. ARTAMUS LEUCORHYNcHUS (L.); Salvad. J. c. p. 140.

a. “No. 194. Sibu Island, May 5, 1874. Inris dark cho-
colate; bill pale bluish ; legs pale leaden. Pairing.” |

This specimen has a much more robust bill than any of
the others from various localities with which I have com-
pared it.

56. CALORNIS CHALYBEA (Horsf.); Salvad. /. c. p. 271.

a. “No.49. o&. Sibu, Dec.1873. Iris crimson; bill and
legs black. Pairing.

6. “9. Sibu Island, April 29, 1874.

ce. “3S. Sibu Island, May, 4, 1874. Iris crimson; bill
and feet black. Pairing.”

The latter bird is a young male, white below, with black

46 Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Contributions to the

streaks, the female in full green plumage, like the first-men-
tioned male.

I have compared these Sibu birds with a large series from
Sarawak (Wallace), Malacca (Wallacé), KE. Java (Wallace),
and Tenasserim (Packman), and I find them all identical.
The Philippine bird is duller and more bronzy, with a shghtly
stronger bill, as pointed out by Count Salvadori; but the slight
purplish violet shade mentioned by him is not a character, as 1t
exists in Malaccan skins sometimes. The Philippine species
is C. panayensis (Scop.), and measures 4°15 inches in the
wing, which is about the size of C. chalybea.

C. tyileri, from the Andamans and Nicobars, must be kept
distinct: it is dull-coloured, like the Philippine species, but
very much larger: wing 4°5 inches. Lord Walden considers

it to be the same as continental examples of C. affinis (Ibis, ~~

1874, p. 145). I have four specimens before me from the
Islands of the Bay of Bengal; and I cannot consider them
quite the same as two Tenasserim birds, which, in tint of green
and in size, agree with Malaccan ones. C. ¢ytleri, however, is
not a very strongly marked species. [Cf. also Lord Walden’s
recent observations (Ibis, 1871, p. 461).]|

The following remarks apply to Lord Walden’s synopsis
of the genus Calornis (Tr. Z. S. vi. pp. 79, 81), where the
best review of the genus is to be found :—

C. neglecta, Walden, l.c.. Hab. Celebes and Sula Islands.
The single Celebean specimen (Meyer) in the Museum not
being quite full-plumaged, I cannot speak with certainty as
to its complete identity with the Sula-Island bird; but the
shade of green seems darker in the latter. Lord Walden,
however, who has had better series to examine than I have,
says they are the same. The long tail (4°4 inches) will dis-
tinguish this species from C. chalybea, which it approaches
in colour ; it measures nearly an inch more than in the latter
bird, whose tail does not seem to exceed 3°5 inches.

Calornis obscura, Forst. A very dull green species, of
which the Museum has a series of specimens from Batchian,
Gilolo, and Morty, all collected by Mr. Wallace.

Calornis crassirostris, Walden, I. c. p. 80. This species I

Ornithology of Borneo. 47

do not know, and I should doubt its locality being Lombock.
Of its habitat, however, Lord Walden is not certain.

Calornis mysolensis, Gray. Hab. Mysol, Bouru, Ceram,
Salwatti. From all of these places Wallacian specimens are
before me. Thespecies, as Lord Walden observes, is scarcely
separable from C. obscura, but it is rather stouter. The C.
cantoroides of Mr. G. R. Gray, considered by Mr. Wallace
to be a good species, is, in my opinion, nothing but C. myso-
lensis before it has quite completed its long tail: none of the
four specimens before me seems to be full-plumaged.

Calornis pacifica (Gm.), of which I have an example from
the Caroline Islands, is nothing but a shghtly more metallic
race of C. mysolensis, with a still stouter bill. |

Calornis metallica. The figure in the ‘ Planches Coloriées’
suits best the Australian bird. Temminck gives the habitat
of his species as Timor and Celebes, from neither of which
places has such a Calornis yet been seen. I therefore unite C.
purpurascens of Gray to C. metallica, as a pair of birds collected
at Cape York by the late Mr. Macgillivray agree well with
Temminck’s figure. A Goram specimen is also identical.
At the same time the only difference between C. metallica
and C. viridescens is the greater amount of purple on the sides
of the body, a very variable character. |

Calornis amboinensis, Gray. Lord Walden gives its cha-
racters as closely resembling the Australian species, but
smaller. It is intermediate between that and C. viridescens,
and has only a little purple gloss on the sides of the body ; —
its bill, however, is slightly shorter than either, but the wing
agrees with some examples of each of the above species; so
that the smaller size does not go for much. The Ceram bird
is identical; and I see no reason for separating either from
C. viridescens.

Calornis viridescens, Gray. I cannot find any difference
between examples collected by Mr. Wallace in the following
localities—Sula Island (1), Gilolo (2), Ternate (1), Mata-
bello (2), N. Ceram (1), Aru Islands (4).

Calornis gularis. The type specimen, from Mysol, is now
lying before me; and I must pronounce this, contrary to Lord

48 Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Contributions to the

Walden’s opinion, a very good species, distinguished by its
purple throat and small bill, the culmen only measuring °65
inch, as against ‘85 in C. viridescens.

C. minor, Mill., is, of course, a very good species, belonging
to the short-tailed group, but possessing the purple and green
coloration of C. viridescens and its allies. Mr. Wallace’s spe-
cimens in the Museum collection are from Lombock (2), E.
Timor (3), Flores (1).

C. nitida, Gray. The Museum contains a single example
from New Ireland; and this differs from all the large series of
C. viridescens (to the group of which Lord Walden has cor-
rectly assigned it) in wanting the distinct metallic purple
mantle-patch, this part of the back being scarcely at all shaded
with purple.

57. CoRYDON SUMATRANUS (Raffl.); Salvad. /.c. p. 111.

a. “2. Sibu, Sept. 26,1873. Iris dark brown; bill tinged
crimson.”

The individual sent by Mr. Everett has a very deep rose-
coloured dorsal patch, and agrees with Banjermassing and
Malaccan skins in the Museum. Two Sumatran examples,
collected by Mr. Wallace, have a very pale yellowish dorsal
patch.

58. Kurytamus savanicus (Horsf.); Salvad. /. c. p. 107.
a. “No. 150. 9. Sibu, Oct. 2, 1873. Iris pale green;
bill greenish blue; legs leaden grey.”

59. HuRYLZMUS OCHROMELAS, Raffl.; Salvad. J. c. p. 108.

a. “No. 103. Q. Jambusan, Sept.5, 1874. Iris bright
gamboge; legs pink opalescent; bill pale bright blue; an-
terior half of maxilla yellow-green; both maxilla and mandi-
ble margined with blackish purple. Coleoptera in the gizzard.
Two tolerably large ceca col. Black collar interrupted in
the female.”

This bird, Mr. Everett says, is common all over Sarawak.
It will be seen that he affirms the absence of the pectoral band
in the female.

60. CYMBIRHYNCHUS MACRORHYNCHUS (Gm.).
a. “No. 125. ¢. Sibu. Iris dark green; beak cobalt.”

Ornithology of Borneo. 49

Another specimen, more adult, has no label attached; the
outer tail-feather has an obscure oblique spot of white. The
Sibu specimen has two outer tail-feathers on each side dis-
tinctly spotted with white.

I have lately examined a bird from Saigon, in Cochin China,
which was pale in coloration when compared with Malaccan
examples ; but I believe this to be merely the result of bleach-
ing, as the parts not exposed to the light are of the normal
colour.

Count Salvadori has separated the Malaccan Cymbirhynchus
from the Bornean one, as the latter is supposed to have no
white spots on the tail. As we have a large series of these
birds, I have passed them under review in order to test the
characters of these two species, and give the following results.
I may premise by saying that all the specimens marked C.
affinis by Mr. George Robert Gray, are nothing but the
ordinary species. Our examples are chiefly from Malacca ;
but some show the extension of the range of this species into
Camboja and Siam; so that Dr. Salvadori was naturally led
to melude these countries within the habitat of C. affinis (cf.
Atti R. Accad. Tor. xi. p. 418). The following remarks reier
to the Museum specimens :—

a. 2. Sumatra (Wallace). Two outer tail-feathers marked
with white.

b. 3. Malacca (Wallace). Three outer tail-feathers marked
with white ; wing-coverts tipped with small white dots (? re-
mains of immaturity).

c. Malacca. Two outer rectrices marked with white.

d. Ditto. Ditto.

e. Ditto. Ditto.

f. Malacca (Harvey). Three outer rectrices largely marked
with white.

g. Malacca (Harvey). Three outer rectrices marked, the
spot disappearing on the third; a few wing-coverts terminally
spotted with white.

h. Malacca. Three rectrices marked with white; spots on
wing-coverts large.

SER. III.—VOL. VI. E

50 Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Contributions to the

i. Tenasserim (Packman). Five outer rectrices marked
with white, being all but the two centre ones.

k. Tenasserim (Packman). Tailimperfect, but all the fea-
thers marked with white, except the two centre ones.

1. Tenasserim (Packman). Four outer tail-feathers marked
with white.

m. Siam (Mouhot). All but the two centre feathers marked
with white, the spots, however, decreasing towards the centre
_ of the tail.

n. Camboja (Mouhot). Three feathers on one side and
four on the other marked with white.

o. Saigon. Three outer rectrices marked with white.

It will be evident from this that the white spot on the tail-
feathers is a very variable character; nor does difference of
age seem to account for this variation. Specimens from the
same locality are not always marked in the same way; but
those from the more northern localities seem to carry a greater
number of white marks, as arule. ‘The only Bornean speci-
mens in the collection tend to bear out Count Salvadori’s
characters,—a young bird having a uniform tail, with nothing
but a faint white shade near the apex of the inner web of the
outermost rectrix ; this cannot-be called a spot; but an adult
bird has a decided spot on the outer tail-feather, and a faint
one on the penultimate one: but in neither of these specimens
is the mark so distinct as in the Malaccan examples.

61. Munta arricapizya (V.); Salvad. 1. c. p. 265.
a. “No.9. Jambusan.”

62. ErytHrura pRasina (Sparrm.); Salvad. 1. c. p. 268.
a,3;6,c,2. “No.8. Sibu. Iris chocolate ; legs pale
claret-colour.”

Count Salvadori states that one of the females in the series
collected at Sarawak by the Marquis Doria and Dr. Beccari
had a tinge of rose-colour on the abdomen. The old female
shot by Mr. Everett has a strong tint of rose-colour on the
breast, and is otherwise coloured like the male, excepting that
the plumage is duller, the tail not so long, and the rosy tint be-
low is confined to the upper breast. The other female sent

Ornithology of Borneo. d1

by Mr. Everett has not the pointed tail, and shows no blue
on the face or throat, nor is there any rose-colour on the
underparts ; this is probably a much younger bird.

63. TRERoN oxax (Temm.): Salvad. J. c. p. 289.
a, 6. “No. 153. Sibu, August, 1873.”

64. CarpopHaca @NuEA (L.); Salvad. J. c. p. 290.
a. “No.116. 3g. Sibu, Dec.18, 1874. Iris, feet, and lores
crimson ; bill greenish lead-colour.”

65. RotiuLus RouLout (Scop.); Salvad. J. c. p. 808.

a. “No, 184. ¢. Puak, Upper Sarawak, Sept. 24, 1874.
Iris purple-brown ; orbital space, legs, base of maxilla, and
basal half of mandible deep coral-red, the rest of the bill
black.”

66. Cuaraprivs ruLvus (Gm.); Salvad. J. c. p. 318.

a. “No. 62. o&. Sibu, Oct. 1873. Iris brown.”

6. “2. Sibu, Oct. 20,1874. Iris chocolate; legs greenish
lead-colour.”’

67. ANGIALITIS DUBIA (Scop.); Salvad. J. ¢. p. 316.

_a.“2, Sibu, Sept. 1873. Iris chocolate; legs chrome.”
a.“*2. Sibu. Iris chocolate; legs greenish yellow.”
The specimen with the greenish legs is immature.

68. GLAREOLA ORIENTALIS, Leach; Salvad. /. c. p. 319.

a. ‘“No.67. 2. Matu beach, May 8, 1875. Inis choco-
late; gape orange.”’

bE GS. Sibu?

‘ec. “3 juv. Sibu, Oct. 1874.”

The male has rather a stouter bill than the female, and has
the colours decidedly brighter, the loral spots and black
throat-ring being much more strongly defined.

The young bird has all the feathers of the upper parts nar-
rowly edged with rusty fulvous, especially on the hind neck,
where there is a slight indication of the lhght collar of the
adult ; the throat is much paler than in the old bird, and has
traces of dusky brown spots; but thereis no sign of the white
crescent round the throat, nor is the black ring continuous,
but is rather fornied of disconnected black spots. The mark-

52 Mr. R. B. Sharpe on two new

ings on the wings and tail are the same as in the adults; but
the colours of both are browner.

Besides the localities given by Count Salvadori, the Mu-
seum possesses examples from Penang (Wallace) and Bang-
kok (Conrad).

69. NUMENIUS UROPYGIALIS.
a. “No. 7. Bruit, Nov. 30, 1873. Iris chocolate; legs

lead-blue ; bill brown.”

70. Buroripes savanica (Horsf.); Salvad. /.c. p. 351.

a. “No.172. Qad. Sibu, Nov. 18, 1873. Iris bright yel-
low ; legs light greenish ; bill dark greenish.”

b. “9 juv. Sibu, Nov. 1873. Iris bright yellow ; legs yel-
lowish green ; bill greenish black.”

c. “3 juv. Sibu, Nov. 1874. Legs bright yellowish green,
darker on the tarsus and the toes.”

71. TRINGA ALBESCENS, Temm.; Sharpe & Dresser, B. Eur.
pt. xu.

Actodromas albescens, Salvad. l. c. p. 328.

a,b. “ No.22. ¢. Matu beach, May 8, 1874. . Iris brown.”

These beautiful little Stints are in full summer-plumage,
and have the appearance of miniature Sanderlings.

72. TRINGOIDES HyPoLEUCUs (L.); Salvad. l.c. p. 326.
a. “No.58. @. Sibu Island, Oct. 20, 1874. Iris choco-
late; legs pale lead-grey.”

VI.— Descriptions of two new Species of South-African Birds.
By R. Bowpier Suarpre, I.L.S., F.Z.S., &c., Senior As-
sistant, Zoological Department, British Museum.

My friend Mr. F. A. Barratt has recently returned to Eng-
land with a small but interesting collection of birds, made in
a district of South Africa as yet uninvestigated by the ornitho-
logist. Having worked for some time in the Transvaal, he
proceeded to the Lydenberg district, and collected parti-
cularly in the neighbourhood of the Macamac goldfields

here, on the western slope of the Drakenberg mountains, he

Species of South-African Birds. 53

obtained the most interesting of his specimens, a full account
of which he proposes to give in a separate paper. Many
species hitherto supposed to be restricted to the coast-line of
Natal, are now found to extend much further in the interior ;
and his researches have therefore contributed in no small de-
gree to extend our knowledge of the geographical distribution
of the South-African avifauna. Two species obtained by him
appear to me to be undescribed. |

ANDROPADUS FLAVOSTRIATUS, Sp. 0.

Adult female. General colour above olive-brown, with some-
what of a yellowish tinge; head dusky grey, the lores and
feathers round the eye greyish white ; ear-coverts grey, with
narrow white shaft-streaks; cheeks greyish white ; throat
pure white; rest of under surface whitish, the feathers edged
with greenish yellow, causing the breast to appear streaked
with that colour; sides of the body dull greenish olive, deep-
ening on the lower flanks and under tail-coverts; thighs
greenish olive; under wing-coverts dull yellow, marked with
brown near the edge of the wing; scapulars and least wing-
coverts coloured like the back; rest of the wing brown, all
the feathers externally washed with olive, inclining to golden
brown on the outer webs of the secondaries ; upper tail-coverts
and tail brown, strongly washed with olive-green; “ bill,
tarsi, and feet ash-colour; iris ashy hazel.” ‘Total length 7-4
inches, culmen °75, wing 3°45, tail 3°5, tarsus 1.

Mr. Barratt obtained two specimens at Macamac on the
Ist of July, 1874. Another example was obtained by Dr.
Kirk on the Shiré river, and has been for some time in the
British Museum, without a name. It is quite possible that
the species may be ultimately placed in the genus Criniger ;
but it has the serrations in the bill as plain as most An-
dropadi, and, until the much-needed revision of the African
Bristle-necked Thrushes takes place, this species must be
placed near A. gracilirostris (Strickl.).

BRADYPTERUS BARRATTI, Sp. 0.
General colour chocolate-brown, rather more rufous on the
rump, and decidedly more so on the wings and tail, which are
~

54 Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Trochilidee.

washed with rufous ; feathers in front of the eye fulvescent ;
cheeks and ear-coverts dark brown, narrowly streaked with
whitish ; throat white, the chin unspotted, but the rest of the
throat broadly streaked with dark brown, these streaks be-
coming plainer on the breast, which, like the sides of the
neck, is more ashy grey than the rest of the back; flanks
brown, as also the thighs and under tail-coverts; centre of
abdomen white ; under wing-coverts ashy brown, mottled with
dark brown markings. Total length 5°8 inches, culmen ‘55,
wing 2°45, tail 2°6, tarsus °85.

A second specimen is more dingy underneath, and is not
so clearly marked as the one described. It seems to me to
differ from all the other African Bradypteri, of which the
Museum has a large series, by its black bill and distinctly
striped throat and breast.

VII.—Notes on the Trochilide. The Genus Lampropygia.
By D. G. Exuiot, F.R.S.E., F.L.S., &e.

Tue genus Lampropygia contains only a few species ; but they
are large handsome birds, possessing a considerable amount
of metallic colouring. They are closely allied on the one
hand to the members of the genus Bouwrcieria, and on the
other to those composing the genus Agleactis; mdeed I
am not altogether satisfied of the necessity of separating them
from the first-named genus, and think perhaps it may be
better, in some future arrangement of the family, to retain the
species treated of in this paper in the genus Bourcieria. 'The
birds usually restricted to the genus Lampropygia are met
with from Venezuela down the western coast of South Ame-
rica to Bolivia, no species having been found inhabiting
Eastern South America or any portion of Central America.
Venezuela contains L. celigena, described by Lesson, and
erroneously attributed by him to Mexico ; Columbia has three
species, L. columbiana (characterized in this paper), DL. pru-
nelli, and L. wilsont, the last being also an inhabitant of
Keuador ; while Bolivia, as yet, has only given us ZL. boliviana,

OE ee

Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Trochilide. 55

obtained at a height of 8000 feet. Two doubtful species re-
main :—one, L. purpurea, stated to be a native of Popayan ;
and the specimen mentioned hereafter as like DL. prunelli
with a purple throat, whose habitat is said (perhaps in error)
to be Ecuador. These are all the species of Lampropygia
known at the present day, good or bad, so far as I am aware.
The members of the genus naturally form two divisions or
groups—those with white crescentic marks on the sides of the
neck, and those without this character. The first of these
sections contains two well-marked species, and two doubtful ;
the latter, three that are well distinguished from each other.
The following table exhibits these sections and the differences
by which the various species may be recognized :—

A. White crescent-shaped marks on either side of neck.
a. General plumage purplish brown.

a’. Throat dark grey without metallic lustre ...... LI. purpurea.
b'. Throat bright metallic purple ................ LL. wilsoni.
b. General plumage black.
a’. Gular spot metallic green, sometimes with blue
97 AES OLA a oUi - Beal eink Raa ee Pad Ger tae eee eee LT. prunelli,
b'. Gular spot dark metallic purple .............. Sp.
B. Without white marks on side of neck; throat without
metallic colouring. |
a. Upper parts coppery red ; tail dark rufous olive .. L. cahgena.
b. Upper parts dark olive; tail bright olive ........ LL. columbiana.
ce. Upper parts blackish brown ; tail dark olive, tinged
Pe UM SUED LOstve cpa ale oor iecain kvl twas vi whe eh ate ein risie © L, boliviana.

LAMPROPYGIA C@HLIGENA. :

Ornismya ceeligena, Less. Troch. p. 141, pl. 53 (1882).

Mellisuga celigena, G. R. Gray, Gen. Birds, 1. p. 112, sp. 15.

Celigena typica, Bonap. Consp. Av. i. p. 73; Gould, Mon.
Troch. iv. pl. 255.

Lampropygia celigena, Cab. & Heine, Mus. Hein. Theil 111,
p- 78; Gouid, Intr. Troch. p. 136, sp. 281.

Hab. Venezuela.

This species was first described by Lesson in his ‘ Trochi-
lide,’ and also a good figure given. He was in error in
stating its habitat to be Mexico, as it is not found in that
country. Great confusion exists im the synonymy of this

56 Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Trochilide.

species, from the fact that Lesson’s bird seems to have been
overlooked by Trochilidists, and confounded with one sent in
great numbers to Europe from the neighbourhood of Bogota,
and to which Lesson’s name, celigena, has been applied. But
the truth is that the Bogota bird belongs apparently to a dis-
tinct species, presenting many and constant characters whereby
it differs from its Venezuelan relative, and which at all times
render it easily to be distinguished. It may be considered
somewhat a matter of surprise that these birds should ever
have been confounded together; for Lesson’s figure is an un-
usually good one, representing his species coloured in a man-
ner not often surpassed for its fidelity. ‘To enumerate some
of the differences which distinguish LD. ceeligena from the Bo-
gota bird, which I have characterized in this paper as L. colum-
biana, I may state that it is much larger, its total length
being six inches, whereas the other is not over five inches
and a half. L. cwligena has the top of the head, back, and
shoulders of the wing dark coppery red, with a metallic lustre,
while these parts in L. columbiana are brown, inclining to
olive, being lightest onthe head. The tails of the two also are
differently coloured, that of the Venezuelan bird being a red-
dish bronze, while the Bogota species has it of an olive hue.
Between the bronze feathers of the back and the metallic
ones of the rump, when viewed from behind, there is in L.
celigena a well-marked (indeed, conspicuous) dividing line;
but in L. columbiana the rump-feathers blend gradually with
those of the back, leaving no appreciable mark of division.
The two forms seem better qualified for a specific separation
than is usually the case in closely allied members of the Tro-
chilide. For facility of comparison, I here give a descrip-
tion of Lesson’s bird :—

Upper part of head, back, and shoulders of wing dark
coppery red, metallic in certain lights, Rump, viewed from
behind, very brilliant metallic green, more extended than in
the same part of L. columbiana. Throat white, central por-
tion of feathers blackish brown. Breast dark grey. Abdo-
men smoke-colour ; flanks reddish bronze. Wings bright
purple. Tail dark olive, with coppery reflections. Bill

Olona a ee is

Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Trochilide. 57

straight, black. Feet black. Total length 6 inches, wings
3g, tail 4, bill 14.

LAMPROPYGIA COLUMBIANA.

Hab. Columbia (common in the vicinity of Bogota), Ecuador
(Gould).

In the preceding article on L. celigena, I have given the
chief characters of the two species, which apparently make it
requisite that they should be separated; and by conferring
upon this one a distinctive appellation, both are rescued from
the great confusion now existing in their synonymy, and
ornithologists are enabled to distinguish without difficulty
which form may be before them. The present bird is sent
to Europe in great numbers from Bogota—in fact, is one of
the commonest species of Humming-birds. Lesson’s species,
on the contrary, is by no means so generally met with; and
as they bear a resemblance to each other,this may be the reason
that the two have been confounded together under his name,
especially if the accuracy of his plate has been viewed with dis-
trust. In order to avoid further difficulty in the recognition
of this species, I append a description of it, which, when
compared with that given above of L. celigena, will enable
any one to ascertain the differences between the two birds.

Top and sides of head and nape of neck olive-brown, with
a rufous reflection; back same as head, slightly darker in
colour; rump (viewed from behind) brilliant metallic green.
Wings purple; shoulders olive-brown, similar to the back.
- Throat white, centre of feathers blackish brown ; upper part
of breast smoky white, growing dark towards the abdomen,
which last, together with the flanks, is very dark rufous brown.
Under tail-coverts reddish brown, central portion of the fea-
thers blackish brown. ‘Tail olive-brown, iridescent. Bill
straight, black. Feet black. Total length 54 inches, wing
3, tail 2, bill 1)5.

LAMPROPYGIA BOLIVIANA.

Lampropygia boliviana, Gould, Intr. Mon. Troch. p. 187,
sp. 282.

Hab. Bolivia (Buckley).

58 Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Trochilide.

This species is but little known, and only a few collections
possess examples of it. Mr. Gould first described it in the
‘Introduction’ to his monograph of the Trochilide, but did
not figure it in the body of his work. This is to be regretted,
as his description does not convey an adequate idea of its
distinctness from L. celigena, with which he compares it.
For a long time the specimen in Mr. Gould’s cabinet was the
only one known; but last year Mr. Buckley brought a limited
uumber from Bellavista, in Bolivia, procured at a height of
8000 feet. It is very distinct from all the other members of
this genus. Although darker, it is similar to the two previous
species in its underparts; but above it is almost black upon
the head and back, while the tail is extremely dark olive-
brown, the central feathers being slightly shaded with purple.
Wings glossy purple. Measurements of a specimen in my
collection give, total length 53 inches, wing 33, tail 23,
ley

LAMPROPYGIA PRUNELLI.

Trochilus prunelli, Bourc. & Muls. Ann. des Sc. & d’Agric.
Lyon, p. 36, pl. 1 (1843). :

Mellisuga prunellei, G. R. Gray, Gen. of Birds, i. p. 112.

Bourcieria prunelii, Reich. Troch. Enum. p. 7, pl. 750.
figs. 4721, 4722.

Celigena prunella, Gould, Mon. Troch. vol. iv. pl. 257.

Lampropygia prunellet, Gould, Intr. Troch. p. 137, sp. 284.

Hab. Columbia.

This is a very common and well-known species, plentiful
in collections from Bogota, and easily recognizable from its
black plumage and green metallic throat-mark. It is not
to be confounded with any other species of Lampropygia,
unless the bird that I am about to call the attention of Tro-
chilidists to should really prove to be a distinct species. [
have had for a long time in my collection a specimen of
Lampropygia similar in all respects to L. prunelli, save one,
which, however, is sufficiently striking to make it readily
distinguishable from that species. This character is the
colouring of the throat. In all specimens of L. prunelli that

Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Trochilide. ~ 59

I have seen (and I have examined a very large number) the
throat-mark is green, with sometimes a shading of blue, as
might be expected. In the specimen before me the throat is
adark metallic purple, more like in colour the spot, in L. wil-
soni, but darker. Not wishing to add what might be a douht-
ful species to a family of birds that already possesses so many,
and thus increase a sufficiently overburdened synonymy, I
have never characterized this specimen, hoping to get some
more examples similar; but thus far I have been unsuccessful.
It was said to have been procured in Ecuador, which, if true,
is a new locality for L. prunelli, and my specimen may belong
to an allied species. It will be sufficient for me to call the
attention of ornithologists to- the existence of such a bird,
and at present the bestowal of a name upon it is practically
unnecessary.

LAMPROPYGIA WILSONI.

Trochilus wilsoni, Delatt. & Boure. Rev. Zool. 1846, p. 305.

Mellisuga wilsont, Gray & Mitch. Gen. Birds, i. p. 112,
sp. 16.

Lampropygia wilsont, Reich. Enum. Troch. p. 7, t. 751.
figs. 4723, 4724; Gould, Intr. Troch. p. 187, sp. 285.

Celigena wilsoni, Gould, Mon. Troch. iv. pl. 258.

Hab. Ecuador; San Buenaventura, Columbia (Bourcier).

This species was first described by Bourcier and Delattre
in the ‘ Revue Zoologique’ for 1846, from a specimen pro-
cured at San Buenaventura, in Columbia. It is apparently
more abundant in Ecuador, as most of our specimens come
from that portion of South America. Although allied to L.
prunelli, it is very distinct from that species, and easily recog-
nizable. Formerly rare, it is now generally observed in large
collections, and is apparently quite abundant in the districts
it inhabits.

. LAMPROPYGIA PURPUREA.
Celigena purpurea, Gould, Mon. Troch. iy. pl. 256.
Lampropygia purpurea, Cab. & Heine, Mus. Hein. Theil i.
p- 71 (note) ; Gould, Intr. Troch. p. 137, sp. 283.
Hab, Popayan? (Gould).

60 Messrs. P. L. Sclater and E. C. Taylor’s

Two specimens of this form are in Mr. Gould’s collection,
no others being known to exist. The characters these ex-
amples present are not sufficiently satisfactory to entitle
them to an independent specific rank without giving rise
to great doubts regarding the propriety of such an acknow-
ledgment. Mr. Gould, in his work, compares them with
L. celigena; but their affinity is doubtless with L. wilsoni,
of which species they are probably a dark variety. As we
become better acquainted with the Trochilide, we find that
no family of birds presents 2 larger number of individuals
that vary more or less, in the colour of their plumage, from
the typical style of the species to which they belong; and
whenever one of these is encountered, greater service is ren-
dered to the science of ornithology by waiting for further in-
formation regarding it, than by describing it as distinct.
Had such a policy been followed, one of the most fruitful
sources from which have come so many useless synonyms
would have been dried up long ago, and Trochilidists would
have been spared much unnecessary labour. In the mean-
while, until we have further evidence that will substantiate
its claims to a distinctive rank, L. purpurea cannot but hold
a very doubtful position among the species of this group.

VIII.— Ornithological Notes from Constantinople.
By P. L. Scrater and E. C. Taytor.

During a few days spent in Constantinople in the months of
September and October last, with our attention principally
directed to other objects, we could not hope to be able to do
much for our favourite science. We are nevertheless disposed
to think that some of the notes made during our recent visit
to that great eastern city may be of some little interest to our
brother ornithologists.

First, as regards birds observed by ourselves on “ field and
flood”? we may say a few words. Coming down the Danube
we had occasion to remark that the Crane (Grus cinerea) is,
as yet, by no means extinct in EHastern Europe, as we saw

Ornithological Notes from Constantinople. 61

large flocks of this noble bird on both the Roumanian and
Bulgarian banks. Crossing the Black Sea from Varna to the
Bosphorus, our ship was visited by several Ring-Ouzels (Tur-
dus torquatus), apparently on their way south (Sept. 28rd)
and the same species was subsequently noticed suspended,
along with Rollers, Jays, and Quails, amongst the spoils of
the “ chasseurs’’ at Constantinople. On the Bosphorus, at
this time of the year, the commonest Gulls are certainly the
Yellow-legged Herring-Gull (Larus leucopheus*) and the
Black-hooded L. melanocephalus. These were, in fact, the
only species noticed, except a single pair of L. fuscus at the
entrance to the Sea of Marmora. The Terns observed were
the Common and Sandwich (Sterna hirundo and S. cantiaca),
though others doubtless occur. Flocks of the well-known
Shearwater of the Bosphorus+, varying from five to fifty in
number, were seen every day. _

The following were the land-birds that most attracted our
attention in Constantinople and its vicinity :—

1. Muscicapa PARVA.

This Flycatcher is common along the old walls of the city,
amongst the trees and gardens, and also in the Turkish ceme-
teries, where the tall grave-stones form a most convenient
resting-place for 1t whilst on the look-out for insects. Birds
of the year (or females) are most abundant ; but the full-plu-
maged red-breasted male was also, at least on one occasion,
observed{. The Spotted Flycatcher (WZ. grisola) is likewise

* We cali the Mediterranean Herring-Gull thus in obedience to Mr.
Dresser, although Sclater had previously decided that its name should be
fuscescens. See Larus fuscescens, Sclater, P. Z.S. 1867, p. 815, and Rev.
Cat. Vert. p. 316,—synonyms ignored by Mr. Dresser.

+ The correct scientific name of this Shearwater seems to be still in
question. Strickland (P.Z.8. 1836, p. 101) observed it in the Levant in
1835, and referred it to Puffinus anglorum, which determination is usually
followed. But Acerbi had previously named it ye/kouan (scribe yel-kovan,
“-wind-driver” in Turkish, as Dr. Dickson informs us), and Salvadori
(Fauna d'Italia, Uccelli, p. 299) has recently attempted to vindicate its
claims to specific distinctness.

{ MM. Alléon and Vian (Rev. Zool. 1873, p. 261) seem to think that,
of this species, only the young birds are found on the Bosphorus during

62 Messrs. P. L. Sclater and HE. C. Taylor’s

abundant in the same spots; but the present bird (which we
had never seen in life before) is at once recognizable by the
conspicuous white in the tail as it flits away.

2. TURTUR RISORIUS.

One of the most striking ornithological features of Con-
stantinople, at the season when we visited it, is certainly the
great numbers of Collared Turtledoves (Turtur risorius),
which absolutely swarm all over Stamboul. You see them
flying about the Golden Horn, and perching on the masts and
rigging of the ships. The trees in the Seraglio gardens, and
in the courts of the mosques, are alive with them; and we often
saw them resting on the roofs of the houses in company with
the tame Pigeons. They are not nearly so abundant in Pera
or Galata as in Stamboul; and out in the country we never
observed them at all. Mr. Taylor, in this Journal for 1864
(p. 410), first called attention to the claim of Turtur risorius
to a place in the list of European birds, having observed it in
Constantinople in April of that year. M. Alléon subsequently
(Rev. Zool. 1867, p. 5) published an article on the same
subject. |

One day when walking in the middle of the city of Stam-
boul, Taylor was surprised to see an example of a very familiar
old friend, the Egyptian Turtledove (Turtur senegalensis),
perching on a wall just over his head. This species swarms
all over Egypt, both in town and country, but was hardly ex-
pected to be met with here. We were afterwards told by Mr.
Pearse that it not unfrequently occurs; and we found a spe-
cimen of it at Bebek College.

3.. GARRULUS GLANDARIUS.

We were on the look-out for Jays, which are found where-
ever trees grow on the shores of the Bosphorus, in order to
ascertain whether the ordinary form here is G. glandarius or
the Black-headed G. krynickii. We saw them several times
flymg about among the cypress trees in the great cemetery
at Scutari, and also in other places in the environs of Con-

the autumn migration. But there are several adult males in the Bebek
College collection, besides the one mentioned above, which we saw.

Ornithological Notes from Constantinople. 63

stantinople, but were not able to distinguish the species.
Numerous specimens, however, which we saw hung up in
the poulterers’ shops in Constantinople and in other towns on
the Bosphorus were all Garrulus glandarius ; so that our ob-
servations do not quite agree with Mr. Dresser’s statement in
his article on the Black-headed Jay, that that “is the com-
monest species near Constantinople.”

We notice that MM. Alléon and Vian (Rev. Zool. 1873,
p- 243) speak of an intermediate form as being prevalent,
which might be well expected where the two representative
species iosculate.

So much (or so little, perhaps we should say) for what we
saw in hfe. As regards museums of natural history at Con-
stantinople, we believe there is but one, that of the American
College at Bebek, on the European bank of the Bosphorus,
about six miles from the imperial city. This museum is, in-
deed, still in embryo, but contains a good series of stuffed
specimens of the birds of the Bosphorus and its vicinity, ori-
ginally made by Mr. 'T. Robson, and lately acquired from him
by the authorities of the institution. Dr. Albert L. Long,
to whom the care of the collection is confided, was obliging
enough to give us every facility for examining it. Many of
the birds were of considerable interest ; and we may offer the
following notes upon some few specimens which especially
attracted our attention.

SYRNIUM ALUCO (?).

The collection contains a very curious black Owl which we
consider to be a melanism of Syrnium aluco; and Dr. Long
told us that Robson, who shot the bird near Constantinople,
was of the same opinion. ‘This specimen is rather smaller
than average examples of Syrnium aluco, and is nearly black ;
but in a favourable light one can see traces of the markings
characteristic of that species, showing faintly, like the nearly
obsolete spots on the skin of a black leopard.

Coractras Inpica (Linn,).
A single mounted specimen of the Indian Roller is in the
collection, which is stated to have been shot on the railway-

64: Ornithological Notes from Constantinople.

line on the Asiatic side of the Bosphorus, between Haider
Pacha and Ismidt. Mr. William Pearse, of Haskeui, who is
engaged in obtaining specimens to supplement the series, told
us that he received the skin of the bird when quite fresh, and
that it was shot in company with a flock of the common
Roller (C. garrula). The Indian Roller is already known to
occur on the Persian Gulf. Sclater has examined specimens
obtained at Bunder Abbas by Doria in 1862, now in the Civic
Museum of Genoa; and Mr. Blanford, we believe, likewise met
with it in Southern Persia; so that its occasional occurrence
in Asia Minor is not very surprising. Halcyon smyrnensis has,
we know, a somewhat similar range.

RuticiLua MESOLEUCA (Hempr. & Ehr.) (?).

The collection contains a stuffed specimen of a Redstart
closely resembling the ordinary R. phenicurus, but having _
less white on the forehead, and a conspicuous white wing-
patch, formed by a narrow external white edging to the inner
primaries and the secondaries. It would seem to belong to the
form called mesoleuca by Hemprich and Ehrenberg, of which
Messrs. Blanford and Dresser have given us an account in
their excellent article on Hemprich and Ehrenberg’s types
(Ibis, 1874, p. 843). Mr. Pearse informs us that the bird
was captured by bird-lime near Haskeui, in the autumn of
1874.

A skin of the same form, or nearly so, obtained by Dr.
Kriper near Smyrna, is in Taylor’s collection. Whether this
bird is fairly separable from R. phenicurus is perhaps doubt-
ful; but whatever view may be taken of it, the form SoMa li
occurs occasionally within European limits.

TEREKIA CINEREA (Guld.) ; Degland & Gerbe, Orn. Eur. ii.
pelriz

Although this Wader is a well-known inhabitant of Eastern
Europe, we are not aware that its occurrence in Turkey has
been recorded. Mr William Pearse, of Haskeui, shot a pair
of these birds near the Sweet Waters last summer, which are
now in the Bebek collection. The species would appear to

Notes on Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres. 65

be scarce hereabouts, as Mr. Pearse, who has an extensive
practical acquaintance with the ornithology of the district,
was not acquainted with it, and had not previously met with
specimens.

IX.—WNotes on a ‘ Catalogue of the Accipitres in the British
Museum, by R. Bowdler Sharpe (1874). By J. H. Gurney.

{Continued from vol. v. p. 370. ]
(Plate III.)

Mr. Suarpe places at the head of his subfamily “ Buteonine ”’
the “ Radiated Goshawk” of Gould’s ‘ Birds of Australia,’
under the title of ‘‘ Urospizias radiatus.”’

I have already pointed out (Ibis, 1875, p. 364) that the
generic name of Urospizias is not properly available for this
species ; and Mr. Sharpe has subsequently applied to it the new
generic appellation of “ Erythrotriorchis,’ which had been
suggested as a suitable substitute (vide Notes by R. B. Sharpe
on the rarer Accipitres of Australia, in P. Z.S. 1875, p. 337).

The two measurements given in Mr. Sharpe’s Catalogue as
those of a male and female of this species, have evidently
both been taken from male birds; and in the paper above re-
ferred to, Mr. Sharpe corrects this inadvertence, and gives the
measurements of an actual male and female, recently obtained
by the British Museum from the interior of Queensland, to-
gether with a description of the female, which is in immature
plumage, a stage in which this species had not been previously
described. |

Having myself had a recent opportunity of measuring an
adult female of this rare Hawk, I may here add a note of its
dimensions, viz. wing from carpal joint 16 inches, tarsus 3°5,
middle toe s. u. 3.

I have never examined a skeleton of this species; but the
considerable difference in size between the sexes, and the
great prolongation of the middle toe, lead me to doubt whether
Mr. Sharpe has taken a correct view in placing it among the
Buzzards, instead of allowing it to remain among the Hawks,

SER. I1I.—VOL, VI. F

66 Mr. J. H. Gurney’s Notes on

where a place had been assigned to it in the most recent syste-
matic works of Gould, Schlegel, and G. R. Gray.

The second genus in Mr. Sharpe’s arrangement of the Bu-
teonine bears the title of Heterospizias, under which name
Mr. Sharpe has separated, and, I think, legitimately, Falco
meridionalis of Latham, a species which has been referred to
no less than ten different genera by previous ornithological
authors.

Mr. Sharpe places the genus Tachytriorchis third on his
list; but it will be convenient for my purpose to postpone its
consideration till after I have referred to the first species enu-
merated by him as belonging to the genus Buteo, the so-called
‘‘ Chilian Sea-Eagle ”’*.

I quite agree with Mr. Sharpe in placing this fine species
in the Buteonine subfamily ; but I think it sufficiently distinct
to make it advisible to retain for it the subgeneric name of
Geranoaétus proposed by Kaup, and adopted by some subse-
quent authorities, amongst the most recent of whom are
Messrs. Sclater and Salvin, in. their ‘Nomenclator Avium
Neotropicalium,’ p. 119. :

According to D’Orbigny (‘ Bia dans VP Amérique Méri-
dionale,’ Oiseaux, p. 77), this species does not attain its full
plumage till it has reached its fourth year; and its interme-
diate stages are described in considerable detail by that careful
observer; but neither he nor Mr. Sharpe mentions a phase
of plumage which occurs when the bird has nearly completed
its progress towards maturity +, and which I will therefore de-
scribe from a specimen .in the Norwich Museum, a female,
obtained in Ecuador :—Upper surface as in Mr. Sharpe’s de-

* Vide ‘Gardens and Menagerie of the Zoological Society,’ 1831, p. 85,
also ‘ Revised List of the Vertebrated Animals in the Gardens of the
Zoological Society,’ 1872, p. 214.

+ This phase does not occur in the case of every yy and perhaps
only in the females—as a young male from Chili, in the ah Museum,
is evidently changing from the plumage dearnated by Mr. Sharpe as
“young” into that which he defines as “ adult,” without passing through
the intermediate stage to which I have here alluded. In the normal adult
female the slaty black on the chest extends about an inch lower than it
does in the adult male.

Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres. 67

scription of the adult; the slaty black of the breast without
any whitish tips to the feathers, and extending down to the
extremities of the under tail-coverts, and over all the inter-
mediate parts except the thighs, but intermingled on the ab-
domen with a few mottled feathers of two shades of grey,
and with the under tail-coverts inconspicuously tipped with
grey ; the thighs clothed with mottled grey feathers, which,
for the most part, resemble those interspersed amongst the
black plumage of the abdomen; but in some of them the mot-
tlngs have already begun to assume the arrangement of the
transverse markings with which, in the succeeding stage, all
the tibial feathers are barred, in common with the remainder
of the under surface except the chest.

In the succeeding stage the bird bears a remarkable general
resemblance in its coloration and markings to its somewhat
more northern and much scarcer ally, Leucopternis princeps.

In very old males of Geranoaétus melanoleucus (and pos-
sibly in old females also; but of this I am not sure) the trans-
verse bars of grey entirely disappear from the whole under
surface, except the wing-linings, the flanks where covered by
the wings, and the under tail-coverts ; in such specimens the
portions of the plumage from which these bars have disap-
peared are then pure white.

I think that Mr. Sharpe is mistaken in stating that the
white tips to the grey feathers of the breast are “ the remains
of immaturity,” as I have met with them in very old indi-

viduals, and do not recollect having ever seen an adult speci- -

men in which they were absent ; in some adult examples these
white tips are to be found on several of the interscapulary
feathers as well as on the breast.

I may add that those portions of the upper surface in the
adult bird which Mr. Sharpe describes as black are all slightly
tinged with slate-colour; so that they may perhaps be more
correctly described as “‘ slaty black” than as “ black ” simply.

To return to the genus Tachytriorchis, Mr. Sharpe, fol-
lowing the late Dr. Kaup, separates under this title two species,
Buteo albicaudatus. and B. abbreviatus ; but as I greatly doubt
whether these two species really follow each other in natural

ee
A fe I _

fh
}
|
if

ae ee gee
—. a

68 Mr. J. H. Gurney’s Notes on

sequence, I propose to treat them both as comprehended in
the genus Buteo, that genus being one which consists of an
ageregation of several natural subgeneric groups, easy to per-
ceive in studying the genus, though difficult to define by any
characters save such as chiefly rest on peculiarities of colo-
ration and markings at different ages.

Mr. Ridgway, in an able paper to which allusion has already
been made in an editorial notice in ‘The Ibis’ for 1875,
p- 500, proposes that the genus Crazirex should be used to in-
clude all those Buzzards which have “ only three of the outer
primaries emarginated on their inner webs ;” but I fear that
this is scarcely a character which can be satisfactorily used as
a basis of generic or subgeneric distinction, inasmuch as it oc-
casionally happens that the outline of the fourth primary varies
somewhat as to the degree in which it 1s emarginated, or sin-
uated, in different individuals of the same species; and this is
especially the case in Buteo erythronotus, in which most of the
specimens which I have examined have had the fourth primary
distinctly emarginated, though I have seen two examples in
which the emargination was barely visible; and’ the latter
seems to have been the case with the specimens examined by
Mr. Ridgway, since he includes this species amongst those
which have but three emarginated. primaries, as he also does
B. poliosomus, of which I have never examined a specimen
with Jess than four primaries distinctly emarginated.

In considering the genus Buteo in the extended sense to
which I have just alluded, I propose to commence by refer-
ring to B. erythronotus, and to those species which appear to
me to be its nearest allies.

Mr. Sharpe gives the length of the wing in the female of
B. erythronotus as 18°5 inches, which I think must be a mis-
print, as in the largest female that I have measured the length
from the carpal joint to the tip of the wing is only 16°5.

_ From an examination of the series of specimens of this
Buzzard in the Norwich Museum, I am led to believe that
the male bird passes through three distinct phases of plumage,
the first being that which is described by Mr. Sharpe as
“young,” and which is common to both sexes, the second

Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres. 69

resembling the dress of the adult female, and the third that
which Mr. Sharpe correctly designates as the plumage of the
“adult male.”

Mr. Sharpe includes Buteo varius of Gould amongst the
synonyms of B. erythronotus—which I am able to confirm,
as the type specimen is now in the Norwich Museum, and is
an immature example of this species.

There is also included amongst the synonyms of B. ery-
thronotus in Mr. Sharpe’s work Buteo unicolor of D’Orbigny ;
but this I am convinced is a mistake, as the Buzzard de-
scribed by D’Orbigny under that name is decidedly smaller
than B. erythronotus, and very differently coloured.

In the list given by Mr. Sharpe of the specimens of B. ery-
thronotus preserved in the British Museum, there is included
an immature skin from the island of Masafuera, that should
no doubt be referred to the very interesting allied species
Buteo exsul, which has only been obtained on that island, and
which, subsequently to the publication of Mr. Sharpe’s vol-
ume, has been described by Mr. Salvin at page 371 of ‘ The
Ibis’ for 1875.

Messrs. Salvin and Godman have very kindly permitted me
to examine their specimens of this fine Buzzard; and I have
thus been enabled to observe that the white margins to the
lesser wing-coverts and interscapulary feathers are broader
and more numerous in the adult female than in the adult male ;
but, beyond this remark, I have nothing to add to the full
description which Mr. Salvin has already published, except to
note that in this species the fourth primary is but very
slightly emarginated.

Another species closely allied to Buteo erythronotus is Buteo
poliosomus. The first plumage of this Buzzard is not described
in Mr. Sharpe’s work ; and I therefore propose to give some
particulars respecting it, taken from three specimens in that
stage obtained in the Falkland Islands, and now preserved
in the Norwich Museum. These bear a general resemblance
to the corresponding plumage of B. erythronotus, but are
much more fuliginous in the tone of their colouring. On
their upper surface the scapulars, interscapulars, and wing-

70 Mr. J. H. Gurney’s Notes on

coverts, especially the latter, exhibit a considerably larger
proportion of fuliginous markings, and a proportionately
smaller admixture of fulvous spots, than are to be found in
the young of B. erythronotus, in contrast with which there is,
however, in the young of B. poliosomus, a conspicuous nuchal
patch of pale luteous, varied by dark brown shaft-marks in
the centre of each feather. 3

On the under surface the young B. poliosomus is by far the
darker bird of the two, except as regards the throat, which is
of an equally deep brown in both species. In the first plu-
mage of B. poliosomus the entire colouring of the underparts
of the body is dark fuliginous brown, with the exception of
narrow fulvous edgings to the feathers on the throat, of some
small fulvous spots on the sides of the breast and abdomen,
and of similar but larger spots on the thighs and under tail-
eoverts. The tail is alike in both species.

The specimen described by Mr. Sharpe as a “ female (? in
changing plumage)” appears from its dimensions to be more
probably a male not fully adult*; and this circumstance, com-
bined with the fact that a very nearly adult male from Chili
(am the Norwich Museum) still retains slight rufous tips to
some of the feathers on the sides of the neck, leads me to be-
lieve that in this species, as in B. erythronotus, the male as-
sumes a plumage resembling that of the adult female, inter-
mediately between its first dress and the final stage of its
adult coloration.

I believe that the plumage described by Mr. Sharpe as
“adult” is that of the adult male only, and that the adult
female is always rufous on the back, and more or less so on
the under surface also.

Assuming this view to be correct, the following are the
measurements of two males and four females preserved in the
Norwich Museum, all of which are either nearly or fully
adult :—

* The “blackish” tint of the slate-coloured parts of the plumage in
this specimen is indicative of its not being a fully mature bird, the slate-
coloured portions of the plumage being a clear grey in fully adult birds of .
both sexes,

Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres. 71

Wing from ¢ Middle

carpal joint. Tarsus, _ LOG, Ba He

inches. inches. inches.
Marestrwes tas) eae 14:9 to 15 3:2 to 3:5 16 to 18
Fomales: + si s:ps' own 15°8 to 16°4 3°25 to 3°5 1:6 to 1:8

In one of these females the entire head, throat, sides and
front of neck, and upper breast are clear unbroken slate-
colour; the hinder neck, mantle, and upper scapulars rufous ;
the lower scapulars rufous mingled with slaty, most of the
last-named feathers being particoloured, with the shafts slaty,
and with that tint spreading, on the feathers nearest the
wing, to the right of the shaft, and on those nearest the cen-
tre of the back to the left of the shaft; the remainder of the
upper portion of the plumage resembles that of the adult male,
except that the interspaces between the dark transverse bars
on the tertiaries are white instead of pale grey; the lower
breast, abdomen, and sides are rufous, darker than the mantle,
and slightly mingled with slaty; the under tail-coverts slaty,
transversely barred with white, and the thighs entirely slate-
coloured. |

Another female, shot from the nest in the month of October,
differs from the above in having the whole under surface, from
the chin to the vent, dark rufous; this, however, is mingled
and tinged with a dark slaty hue on the upper breast and on
the abdomen, but not on the lower breast.

A third female resembles that last described, but with a
larger admixture of slate-colour on the under surface. This.
specimen was marked as a female by the collector, who has ~
also attached to it a memorandum that the irides were “ red-.
dish brown.” :

The fourth female much resembles the second, but still
retains on the wing-coverts the fuliginous plumage of its 1m-
mature dress.

Passing on to the consideration of Buteo albicaudatus, I
may observe that though this species in its adult plumage
exhibits a remarkable general resemblance to B. erythronotus,
it always differs from that Buzzard in three particulars, viz.
that the rufous on the back never extends to the intersca-
pulary feathers, that it is common to the adults of both sexes,

72 Mr. J. H. Gurney’s Notes on

and that the wings reach up to or slightly beyond the ex-
tremity of the tail.

Mr. Sharpe describes the “ general plumage ” of the young
birds of this species as “black ;” but in the youngest speci-
mens which I have seen its colour is dark brown, which sub-
sequently deepens into black in the intermediate stage, and
ultimately passes from black to slate-colour when the bird
assumes its fully adult dress; the “ rufous spots” on the sca-
pulars, and the similarly coloured margins of the lesser wing-
coverts, spoken of in Mr. Sharpe’s description of the “‘ young ”’
bird, are indicative of the commencement of the second stage
of plumage, being absent in the first phase of coloration which
this species assumes; the second plumage, when more com-
pletely developed, exhibits a deeper tint of rufous than exists
in the fully adult bird, and often extending over a large sca-
pulary area, the rufous feathers being also variegated, in this
stage, by broad blackish shaft-marks.

Mr. Sharpe, in his description of the young bird, mentions
the lores as being “ conspicuously white ;” this white, or yel-
lowish white spot, which I should rather describe as covering
the parotic region, seems always to disappear when the second
stage of plumage has been fully attained.

Messrs. Salvin and Godman’s collection contains a speci-
men in the first stage of plumage from the Pacific slope of
Guatemala, in which the fuliginous colouring so greatly pre-
dominates over the fulvous on the under surface, as to be
almost unbroken from the chin to the vent; but it is more
usual in individuals of that age to find the under surface more
or less variegated, as indicated by Mr. Sharpe.

In describing the adult plumage, Mr. Sharpe alludes to the

axillaries as being “sometimes tinged with rufous.” I have —

never met with this m fully adult specimens; but in the pen-
ultimate stage a rufous tinge more or less pervades not only
the axillaries, but also the under wing-coverts and the sides
of the body ; on all these parts the rufous tints are more or
less mingled with black, forming transverse bars of intermixed
dark coloration with white interspaces between them. At
this stage a somewhat similar transverse barring exists on the

Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres. 73

abdomen, and a paler brownish barring on the thighs; but
both these parts are ultimately of a pure white.

The collection of Messrs. Salvin and Godman and that of
the Norwich Museum both comprise specimens of a Buzzard
from tropical South America nearly related to B. albicau-
datus, but principally differing from that species by a pecu-
liarity somewhat resembling that which distinguishes B. po-
liosomus from B. erythronotus, viz. the slaty colouring of the
underparts in the adult plumage. This Buzzard is not men-
tioned in Mr. Sharpe’s work; but Mr. Salvin agrees with me
in considering it to be a distinct species, and has suggested
for it the specific name of “ B. hypospodius,’’ which I propose
to adopt as appropriately characteristic of the peculiar colo-
ration of its under surface.

I subjoin a description of the examples of Buteo hypospo-
dius which have come under my notice, premising that in
this species the characters of the legs, feet, and wings resem-
ble those of B. albicaudatus : the upper part of the tarsus is
feathered in front for about an inch; the wings have the three
first primaries only emarginated; the third primary is the
longest ; but the fourth nearly equals it, and in some speci-
mens is not perceptibly shorter.

The first three specimens to which I shall allude are in the
collection of Messrs. Salvin and Godman ; the remaining three
are preserved in the Norwich Museum.

No. 1, from Medellin, in New Granada, has the entire
head, neck, and throat of a dark slate-colour, the scapulars
and interscapulars a little paler, the former with broad brown-
ish grey tips to most of the feathers, the latter with similarly
coloured tips, but narrower, and with concealed white bases to
the feathers ; the lower back and rump are of a similar slate-
colour, which becomes paler as it approaches the tail-coverts,
and is crossed with alternate but irregular transverse bars of
grey and white on the basal portions of the feathers ; the upper
tail-coverts are white, with dark shaft-marks and dark grey
transverse bars, the latter narrowest on the feathers nearest the
tail ; the general colour of the upper surface of the wings is
slaty, darkest on the lesser and middle wing-coverts, where

3 os

rz =

74: _ Mr. J. H. Gurney’s Notes on

most of the feathers show narrow indistinct brownish tips ;
the primaries are black below the level of the emargination,
above which they are crossed with irregular alternate bars of
darker and lighter grey; the secondaries and tertiaries are
similarly but more regularly barred throughout, and with the
paler bars darker than those on the primaries; all the secon-
daries and tertiaries have a broad dark tip, narrowly edged
at the extremity of each with a shade of pale brown, which is
also just perceptible on the tips of the primaries; the tail is
white, but with a tinge of grey on the external webs of all
the rectrices except the central ones, this tinge being deepest
on the outermost pair, the tail is also barred with eight nar-
row and irregularly dark transverse lines, which are more
distinct on the outer than on the central rectrices, and least
so on the latter as they approach the upper tail-coverts ; below
these transverse lines there is a broad black band, succeeded
by a much narrower band of greyish brown, below which the
tail is narrowly tipped with white.

The breast and wing-linings are of a slate-colour, resem-
bling that of the head, neck, and throat ; the feathers of the
bastard wing are barred on their under side with alternate
markings of darker and lighter grey, succeeded by a dark
slaty tip; the outer axillaries are dark grey, the inner ax-
illaries similar, but with irregular white transverse bars di-
_vided by dark shaft-marks ; the under surface of the remiges
resembles the upper surface, but with the inner webs near the
base finely mottled with intermingled white and grey; the
abdomen and thighs grey, but with many of the feathers,
especially on the thighs, transversely barred with white; the
under tail-coverts resemble the upper tail-coverts, both in
colour and in markings. ;

No. 2, from the mountain region of Merida, in Venezuela,
and marked as a female by the collector, only differs from
No. 1 in the following particulars, viz.:—the lesser wing-
coverts and scapulars, especially the former, are tinged with
rufous, which also appears, though less decidedly, on the
rump, bastard wing, axillary feathers, and abdomen; the

thighs are dark rufous, crossed by narrow bars of white, the

:
|
|
|
:

— a ee ee eee

Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres. 75

latter being most distinct on those feathers which overhang
the upper portion of the tarsus; on the outer sides of the
thighs the rufous is mingled with transverse bars, not only
of white, but also of dark and pale grey; the under tail-coverts
are crossed by alternate bars of rufous and white.

No. 3, from the same district of New Granada as No. 1,
resembles No. 2, but exhibits a considerable amount of deep
rufous on the upper portion of the wing-lining, the rufous
feathers in that part having blackish shaft-marks of varying
breadth, and the broadest of these being situate below the
carpal joint. In this specimen the rufous on the thighs does
not assume the arrangement of transverse bars.

No. 4, from Venezuela, and marked as a female by the late
M. Jules Verreaux, resembles No. 2; but the rufous portions
of the plumage are not so strongly tinged with that colour,
except on the thighs; the wing-lining also exhibits some
rufous, but much less than is the case in No. 3. It also dif-
fers from No. 2 in the absence of rufous from the under tail-
coverts, some of which are barred alternately with white and
grey, also in having white interspaces between the transverse
bars on the inner webs of the tertiaries, and in the grey tint
of the tail being diffused over the central as well as the lateral
rectrices.

No. 5, from the river Amazons, but without any more defi-
nitely known locality, differs from No. 1 in having all the parts
which in that specimen are of different shades of slaty grey,
black with only a very slight tinge of slate-colour (though —
the transverse bars on the wings are discernible in two dif-
ferent shades of slaty black), also in having no white trans-
verse bars on the abdomen and thighs (the latter of which
show in places a very slight tinge of rufous), in the transverse
bars on the tail, as well as those on the upper and under tail-
coverts, being broader, darker, and more distinct, and, lastly,
in the interspaces between the transverse bars on the inner
webs of the tertiaries being more or less entirely white.

No. 6, from Brazil, but from what part of that country I
am unable to say, resembles No. 5, except that the slaty black
plumage of the breast is slightly tinged with rufous brown,

76 Notes on Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres.

and that the scapulars are crossed with concealed transverse
bars of white and pale grey, some of which are also slightly

tinged with rufous.
The following are the comparative dimensions of the six

specimens above described :—

Wing from Culmen Middle

carpal joint. Tail. Tarsus. from cere. _ toe, 8. u.
Nomludaied. 16°7 68 34 11 _ 175
NOg2 wate tis 16°5 6:9 35 de} 1:7
None cose. 16°8 Ta 36 imperfect. 16
PROC EE Wee vu g's 168 a 34 Jt A V7
IN On OV side a> Lies fei sore 2 and: day
Grn Gg ete 16°6 via 3°6 11 15

Nos. 1 and 2 have been portrayed in the annexed plate
(Plate III.), which will assist the reader in recognizing this
interesting Buzzard.

I believe that the first plumage of Buteo hypospodius is
still undescribed, that Nos. 5 and 6 in the above list are in
the second plumage, Nos. 2, 3, and 4 in the third plumage,
and No. linthe fourth. I would further hazard a conjecture
that the fourth plumage will prove to be attained by the males
only, and that the third plumage will be found, though com-
mon to both sexes, to be the final dress of the female.

The five species to which I have just referred, Buteo erythro-
notus, B. exsul, B. poliosomus, B. albicaudatus, and B. hypo-
spodius, appear to me to form a natural group, for which the
name of Tachytriorchis might, I think, be conveniently re-
tained, and legitimately so, as it embraces the species B. al-
bicaudatus, which was the only one originally included by
Kaup under that subgeneric title.

Nearly allied to this group, but, I think, not properly to be
included in it, is the curious Buteo galapagensis, for the re-
ception of which Mr. Gould instituted his subgenus Crazirex.

I have nothing to add to Mr. Sharpe’s account of this
species, except to remark that the sexes differ in size only,
and not in coloration, that being a point to which Mr. Sharpe
does not in this instance refer. ,

[To be continued. ]

= = 5
eet 4 ee ae So" ee ee

eee ta
nee

Imp

M AN. Hanharl

Kulemans hth.

Notes on Severizoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan,’ Vb

X.—WNotes on Severtzoff’s ‘ Fauna of Turkestan’ (Turkes-
tanskie Jevotnie). By H. E. Dresser.

[Continued from vol. v. p. 342.]

Nor long after the former portion of this paper was published
in last year’s ‘Ibis,’ I received a visit from Dr. Severtzoff
himself, who came over here for the purpose of looking over
my collection of Palearctic birds, and of comparing some of
his specimens which he brought with him. During his stay
I had an opportunity of going through his work with him ;
and he also spent some time in adding MS. notes to my copy
of his work, of which I make use in the following article.

127. Ruricitua PHa@NiIcuRUS (L.) ; Severtzoff, p. 65.

Horizontal range. Occurs on passage in districts I., IT., IIT.,
and IV., and breeds in all but the last.

Vertical range. Is found on passage in district 2, breeds in
districts 3 and 4, and is a summer visitant to district 5.

128. Ruticinrta semrruFA, Ehrenb.

Ruticilla erythroprocta, Gould; Severtzoff, p. 65.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts If., III., and IV.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in district 2, and breeds
in districts 3 and 4.

Dr. Severtzoff informed me that he had compared his birds
with Ehrenberg’s type of R. semirufa, and that they are cer-
tainly specifically identical.

129. Ruricitua ERYTHROGASTRA, Giild.; Severtzoff, p. 65.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I., II., and IV., occurs
in winter in districts III. and IV., though rarely in the former,
and has been met with on passage in district III.

Vertical range. Is found on passage in district 2, breeds in
districts 3 and 4.

130. Ruticrtua ERyTHRONOTA, Eversm.; Severtzoff, p. 65.

Horizontal range. Breeds commonly in districts I. and IL.,
less so in district IV., and may breed in district III. ; during
winter it is found in districts ITT. and IV.

Vertical range. Is found on passage in district 2, breeds in

a a aoa ~

78 Mr. H. E. Dresser’s Notes on

districts 3 and 4, and possibly in 5, and is found in winter in
district 2, and possibly also in district 3.

131. RutictLLa CHRULOCEPHALA (Vigors).

Ruticilla lugens, Severtzoff, pp. 65, 121.

Horizontal range. Breeds in district I., and is rare on pas-
sage in district III.

Vertical range. Is found on passage in districts 2 and 3,
rarely in the former, and breeds in district 4.

Severtzoff gives a detailed description of both sexes of this
bird, which I need not reproduce, as he now identifies it with
the plate in Henderson and Hume’s ‘ Lahore to Yarkand’
(pl. xiv. p. 211).

Ruticilla aurorea? Pall.; Severtzoff, p. 65.

This species, which is included with a note of interrogation,
is stated, with a query, to breed in district I. in the horizontal,
and in districts 2 and 3 in the vertical range.

182. CALLIOPE PECTORALIS, Gould.

Calliope bailloni, Severtzoff (C. pectoralis ? Gould), pp. 65,
122. :

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I. and IV.

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 3 and 4.

At page 122 Dr. Severtzoff gives a description of the bird
obtained by him, which clearly shows that it is identical with
. Mr. Gould’s species. I may, however, mention that Dode
brought a specimen of Calliope camtschatkensis, which he said
was obtained by Dr. Severtzoff in Turkestan. This specimen
I have examined and compared with examples from China

and the Ural.

133. CossypHa GUTTURALIS (Guér.).

Trania albigula, nob. (Bessonornis gutturalis, Guér.?), Se-
vertzoff, pp. 65, 122.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts III. and IV., and is
found on passage in district III.

Vertical range. Is found on passage in district 2, and breeds
in district 3.

Dr. Severtzoff states (p. 122) that in Turkestan there are

Severizoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan, 79

three forms of the present species, which he describes, but
without giving them separate names. I have carefully read
these descriptions, and cannot but think they refer to but one
species, especially as he adds that he has found many inter-
mediate examples.

134, Syivra nisor1a, Severtzoff, p. 65.

Horizontal range. Breeds and occurs on passage in districts
LS IL; LL.;and:Ly..

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in district 2, and breeds
in districts 3 and 4.

135. Sytvra ruFA, Bodd.

Sylvia cinerea, Severtzoff, p. 65. |

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I., II., II., and IV.

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1 and 8, and occurs on
passage in district 2.

136. Sytvr1a currvuca (L.); Severtzoff, p. 65..

Horizontal range and vertical range similar to those of
Sylvia rufa.

137. Hyponars taneurpa, Ehr.

Sylvia magnirosiris, Severtzoff, pp. 65, 123.

Horizontal range. Breeds and is found on passage in dis-
trict ITT.

Vertical range. Is found on passage in district 2, and breeds
in district 3.

Dr. Severtzoff informs me that after comparing his speci-
mens with the type of H. languida in the Berlin Museum, he
has no doubt as to their being identical. He also points out
to me that the bird I described (Ibis, 1874. p.420) under the
name of Acrocephalus sogdianensis, is a true Hypolais, closely
allied to H. languida, but differing in the arrangement of pri-
maries and length of the wing ;.and judging from the varia-
tion in specimens of H. languida obtained by him, he thinks
it not improbable that the two (H. languida and H. sogdia-
nensis) may prove to belong to the same species.

138. Sytvra orPHEA, Temm.; Severtzoff, p. 65.

Horizontal range. Breeds and occurs on passage in dis-
trict ITT.

80 | Mr. H. E. Dresser’s Notes on

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in district 2, and breeds
in district 3.

139. Sytvia mystacea, Mén.; Severtzoff, p. 65.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts III. and IV.

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1 and 2.

Dr. Severtzoff assures me that he has good reason to be-
lieve that Ménétriés’s S. mystacea is really specifically distinct
from S. subalpina, although Ménétriés himself afterwards con-
sidered them to be identical. I have therefore treated S.
mystacea as a distinct species, although I have doubts as to
the propriety of so doing.

140. Sytvia nana (Ehr.). .

Atraphornis aralensis (Eversm.) ; Severtzoff, pp. 65, 124.

Horizontal range. Breeds in district III.

Vertical range. Breeds commonly in district 1, and is found,
though rarely, in summer in district. 2.

At page 124 Dr. Severtzoff writes as follows :—“ I may add
that the iris of this species is yellow. It does not frequent
the reeds, but the most arid desert places, which are covered
with bushes of Haloxylon ammodendron or Atraphazxis, where
it runs about on the ground and picks up small insects. The
generic term Atraphornis I have given to this bird on ac-
count of its predilection for the latter plant ; and I separate
it from Salicaria on account of its habits, its white legs, yel-
low iris, and sharp bill. The young differ from the old
birds only by having the plumage softer, and are a little
lighter.”

He further describes a species (at p. 121) under the name
of Atraphornis platyura, which he now informs me is identical

with Drymeca inquieta, Riipp., which stands under the name ~

of Drymeca gracilis (Licht.). This species, he says, “ does
not occur in Turkestan, but in the south-western part of Tur-
comania. In 1859 it was found on the western shores of the
Caspian.” ;

141. AEDoN FAMILIARIS, Mén.

Aedon galactodes, var. familiaris, Severtzoff, p. 65.

Horizontal range. Breeds im districts III. and LV.

Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan, 81

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1 and 8, and is found on
passage in district 2.

142. PHyLLoscoPus sUPERCILIOSUS (Gm.).

Ficedula superciliosa (Cab.) ; Severtzoff, p. 65.

Horizontal range. Breeds and is found on passage in dis-
tricts I., IT., TII., and IV.

Vertical range. Is found on passage in district 2, and breeds
in districts 3 and 4.

143. PayLuoscorus viripanus (Blyth).

Ficedula middendorffii, Meves; Severtzoff, pp. 65, 125.

Horizontal runge. Breeds and is found on passage in dis-
tricts I., II., and ITI.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in district 2, and breeds
in district 3.

At page 125 Dr. Severtzoff writes as follows :—“ Turkestan
specimens of this bird differ so much in the form of the bill,
that I deem it best to refer those with the broad bill to Hy-
polais, under the name of A. graminis, and those with the
narrow bill I call Phyllopneuste intermedia, as being an inter-
mediate form between the former species and P. superciliosa
(Cab.), as my Micedula middendorffi 1s intermediate between
Hypolais and Phyllopneuste. 'The descriptions of these two
forms are as follows :— |

“q. var. intermedia. Bill narrow at the base, and at the nos-
tril its breadth is equal to its height; one third of the bill is
broader than it is high, and two thirds narrower; thus it is
awl-shaped ; quills 3=1>5>6>2>7; first primary short,
being twice as long as the coverts; taileven. Length 4” 8!—
4" ol extent 7" 2", wing 2" 4!" tail 1’ 94", tarsus 7$!", mid-
dle toe 4, culmen 34", breadth of bill at the nostril 1”.

“b, var. hypolania (Hypolais graminis, nob.). The bill nar-
rows gradually from the base to the point, as in Hypolais,
being narrower than in that group, but broader than in true
Phyllopneuste ; the wing is blunt, first primary short, nearly
twice as long as the coverts, 3=4>5>6>7>2>8, or d=4,
2=7, or the 4th the longest, 3=5>7>2>8, or 4=5, 3=6,
2=9; the latter form, with a very blunt wing, was a spring-

SER. I1I.—VOL. VI. G

——

82 Mr. H. E. Dresser’s Notes on

killed bird, and the first quill may not have been fully grown ;
tail short, and a little forked, the middle and exterior rec-
trices 4/", shorter than the 3rd, which is the longest. Length
4! 715!" extent 7-7" 6!", wing 2! 34!"2"' 5", tail 1! 7"1" gM",
tarsus 7!-71!", middle toe 44!", culmen 4!” in the male, and
32" in the female; breadth of the bill at the nostrils 14”,
height #7?

He further remarks that this form is subject to extreme
variation, both as regards the wing and the bill, and adds
that Mr. Meves, after having compared his specimens, iden-
tified them with his P. middendorffi (which = P. viridanus,
as I can positively state, having compared Mr. Meves’s spe-
cimens with examples from India). This species, Dr. Severt-
zoff writes (/.c.), “was found by me throughout the Thian-
shan and Karatau, viz. the variety intermedia in the valley of
Cora, near Copal, in the Alexander Mountains, not far from
Aulje-ata, and at Karatau; but this form is rare. The var.
hypolania, and specimens intermediate between this and the
other, were more numerous in the Karatau and at the foot
of the Thianshan range; both forms frequented grass-steppes
in the plains or at the foot of the mountains.”

144. Puy.ioscorus 1npicus (Jerdon).

Ficedula obscura, Severtzoff, pp. 65, 124.

Horizontal range. Breeds and is found on passage in dis-
tricts I., II., III., and IV.

Vertical range. Is found on passage in districts 2 and 3,
breeds in district 4, and occurs in summer in district 5.

145. Puy.uoscopus Tristis (Blyth).

Ficedula fulvescens, Severtzoff, pp. 65, 126.

Horizontal range. Common during passage in districts L.,
II., III., and IV.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in districts 1 and 2.

At page 126 Severtzoff gives a detailed description, which
I need not reproduce, as I have compared and identified his
specimens. He further writes as follows :—“ This bird is only
a migrant in Turkestan, as also on the lower and central Ural
and the Kirghis steppes. It has been obtained for the Mos-

Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan.’ 83

cow Museum from Irkutsk, and probably breeds in Western
Siberia and at Irkutsk.”

146. AcRocEPHALUS ARUNDINACEUS (Linn.).

Salicaria turdoides, Severtzoff, p. 65.

Horizontal range. Breeds sporadically in districts II., III.,
and IV.

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1 and 2.

I may here name that Dr. Severtzoff informs me that Acro-
cephalus brunnescens was also found by him in Turkestan,
though not included in his work.

147. ACROCEPHALUS STREPERUS (Vieill.).

Salicaria arundinacea, Severtzoff, p. 65.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I., I1., IT.

Vertical range. Breeds in district 1, and rarely in district 2.

148. SaLicaRIA BREVIPENNIS, Severtzoff, pp. 66, 127.

Breeds in the Karatau mountains. At page 127 Severtzoff
writes, “ Salicaria brevipennis, nob., closely resembles Sali-
caria arundinacea ; but the bill is smaller, the wing shorter and
not so sharp, the tail slightly rounded, and in spring it is greyer
and lighter in colour. ‘The first primary is short, being twice
as long as the coverts, the 3rd and 4th are equal, being the
longest, the 2nd =7th, or is a trifle longer, but is shorter
than the 6th; the head, nape, cheeks, back, shoulders, and
rump are yellowish grey ; wings and tail darker, being greyish
brown, with yellow edges ; lores yellowish white, and a super-
ciliary stripe of the same colour extends to the ear; the entire
underparts and under wing-coverts are whitish, tinged with
yellowish brown, which is lightest on the throat. Total length
5! 65!" 8!" extent 7-7" 2", wing 2" 249! 4!" tail 1" gi_Qlt,
the outer tail-feathers 1! shorter than the central ones, tarsus
covered with eight scutelle and 7?” long, middle toe 44", cul-
men 32"; bill brown, lower mandible yellow at the base ;
legs grey, but yellow on the sole. This species is interme-
diate between Salicaria arundinacea and Salicaria scita, and,
like the latter, is often found in grass steppes far from
water. It was also found on the Thian-shan and Karatau

mountains.”

Geax

SS. SEY ie

—

$4. Mr. H. E. Dresser’s Notes on

149. SALICARIA CAPISTRATA, Severtzoff, pp. 66, 127.

Horizontal range. Breeds in district III.

Vertical range. Breeds in district 2.

At page 127 Severtzoff describes this bird as follows :—

Salicaria capistrata, nob. Bill thin, with three bristles
on each side at the base; tail rounded, tail-feathers narrow,
the three outer rectrices shortened; wings short, 4th quill
the longest, 3=5, 2=8, the lst short, being equal to the
coverts; entire upper parts olive-brown ; eyebrows pure white ;
crown blackish brown; quills and larger coverts greyish
brown, with lighter edges ; throat white ; underparts yellowish.
Total length (of a skin) 5” 1", wing 2” 22!" tail 2" 2!" cul-
men 4", It is found in Turkestan and on the eastern shores
of the Caspian.”

150. AcRocEPHALUS DUMETORUM (Blyth).

Salicaria magnirostris, Lilj.; Severtzofi, p. 127.

This species, which Severtzoff at page 66 includes under the
name of Salicaria palustris, with a note of interrogation, he
describes at page 127, from a specimen obtained at Kara-
burgaza on the 23rd May, as follows :—“ First primary equal-
ing the wing-coverts inlength,3=4>5>2>6. Totallength
5" 3!" wing 2” 3!" tail 2” 14", culmen 5. Colour as usual.”

He further describes (p. 128) a bird which he now informs
me he believes to be true Acrocephalus palustris, as follows :—

“ Salicaria turcomana, nob. ¢ in fresh plumage from the
eastern part of the Caspian. Upper parts brown, shaded
with yellow, cheeks and sides of the neck lighter; eyebrows
indistinct; underparts light yellowish white; throat pure
white ; quills and tail brown, as in the preceding species, but
the wings are longer, and the arrangement of the primaries
is different. First quill equal in length to the coverts, 3rd
longest, 2=4>5>6. One killed on the 18th July near Kras-
novodsk Bay measures as follows :—Total length » 2! wing
2! 6, tail 1" 9!", culmen 5! tarsus 8!".”?

151. Savicaria Macronyx, Severtzoff, pp. 66, 128.
Horizontal range. Breeds in district III.
Vertical range. Breeds in district 1.

Severizoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan,’ 85

At page 128 Severtzoff writes as follows :—~ Resembles
No. 150; but its note is different, and it differs in lacking the
light eyebrow, this being replaced by a white spot over each
eye. It resembles S. macroptera in length of wing, but differs
from it and No. 150 in having long distinctly scutellated legs
and long toes, and the hind claw is as long and stout as the
toe itself. First quill shorter than the coverts, 2=5, 3=4;
bill smaller ; tail rounded. Total length 5" 6”, wing 2" 6!",
tail 23", culmen 43", tarsus 10", middle toe 54", hind toe 31",
the hind claw the same length. It inhabits the reeds on the
Syr-Darja, where it is resident.”

152. SaLICARIA EURHYNCHA, Severtzoff, pp. 66, 128.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I., II., and III.

Vertical range. Is found on passage in district 2, and breeds
in district 3.

At page 128 Severtzoff writes as follows :—“ I first obtained
this bird at Mangishlack, on the eastern side of the Caspian ;
and it was also found in Turkestan. It mhabits the steppes
or shores of the rivers, where there is grass or bushes; and it
differs therefore from S. macronyx in habits, which species it
otherwise closely resembles; but the underparts are whiter,
the hind toe is very blunt, the bill is larger, broader, and
thicker, and the arrangement of the primaries is different,
viz. 4>38>5>6>2>7, sometimes 8=4=5. Total length
Bi Alt wing 2! 5", tail 2" 14", culmen 5! tarsus 9". Tur-
kestan specimens have nearly the same arrangement of quills, —
viz. lst shorter than the coverts, 3=4>5>6>2>7, the ex-
terior rectrices 3! shorter than the central ones; upper parts
greyish olive-brown, greyer than in A. palustris ; underparts
and eye-stripe yellowish white, the latter commencing only
from behind the eye, in which it differs at a glance from pa-
lustris, macronyx, and macroptera, as also by its larger size ;
bill brown, base of the lower mandible yellowish ; legs grey.
Total length 5” 5!-5"7"" in the skin, and 6-6" 3! in the flesh,
wing 2! 4!" tail 2" 2", tarsus 83!", middle toe 5’, culmen 5’,
breadth of bill at nostril 12", height 14!".” 4

Mr. H. E. Dresser’s Notes on ,

153. SALICARIA SPHENURA, Severtzoff, pp. 66, 128.

Horizontal range. Breeds in district ILI.

Vertical range. Is rare in summer in district I, and breeds
in districts 2 and 8.

At page 128 Severtzoff writes respecting this bird as fol-
lows :—“ The tail is not only rounded, but even quite sharp,
although the central rectrices are only 3” longer than the
outer ones ; for all the feathers are sharpened towards the tip
in fresh plumage. The bill is very broad, like that of a Fly-
catcher. 38rd quill longest, 2=6, Ist shorter than the coverts,
or 5>2>6. Colour as in No. 147; but the breast is ight
yellow, not yellowish brown, and it has no superciliary stripe. __
Total length 6-6" 4!"", extent 8’—-8" 4!"", wing 2" 6”, tail 2" 24!"
tarsus 9", middle toe 5!, culmen 44", breadth of bill at nos-
tril 14!"-2!"", height 1. It imhabits woods along the Syr
Darja, but is commoner in the bush and grass-covered banks
of its tributaries to the altitude of 1000-4000 feet.”

In concluding his remarks on the above birds (Nos. 147-
158 inclusive), Dr. Severtzoff states that he believes them all
to be forms of Acrocephalus streperus, and only deserving of
subspecific rank, but that he deems it best to describe each
form under a separate name. In this I quite agree, except
that I think that at least Acrocephalus palustris and A. du-
metorum should be looked on as distinct species. The same
view may be taken of the following species, included under
Nos. 154-160 inclusive, which appear to be all forms of Hy-
polais caligata and H. rama; and Severtzoff also informs me
that this is the case; but still I have deemed it advisable to
give his description of each form. In a note, Dr. Severtzoff
says that in all probability Nos. 154, 155, 156, and 157
are all identical with Hypolais rama, Nos. 158, 159, and
160 being referable to H. caligata, but that, before he can
positively state this to be the case, it will be necessary to make
a critical comparison of his types.

: 2 154, SALICARIA GRACILIS, Severtzoff, pp. 66, 130.

Horizontal range. Breeds in district III.
Vertical range. Breeds in district 1.

Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan,’ 87

At page 130 the following description is given :—“ Bill
short and stout, nostrils broad and oval; upper parts, with
wings and tail, olive-brown; eyebrows white; underparts
white ; breast and flanks greyish brown in tinge; iris brown;
legs and lower mandible flesh-coloured, upper mandible
brown; 4th rectrix the longest, the two middle and the outer-
most 2" shorter ; 1st primary rather longer thau the coverts,
2=8, 3=4=5, or 8=4=5,7>2>8. Total length 5! 3!-
Bll 5M, extent 7! 5l_gu Ge: wing gl a tail Q! gll_git a
culmen 334!" tarsus 9!" It inhabits the Syr Darja river,
and frequents the thorn bushes ; arrives in April, and remains
to breed. Adult specimens were obtained directly after their
arrival in spring ; but we got none during the breeding-season,
as they hide so closely in the bushes. In July they are seen
about in company with their young.”

155. Saticaria opsoteta, Severtzoff, pp. 66, 129.

Range. Same as No. 154.

At page 129 Dr. Severtzoff writes as follows :—‘‘ Only one
specimen was obtained, near the Petrofisk fortress ; for it is a
very shy bird. Its bill resembles that of S. pallida; but
there are ten scales on the tarsus, the first primary is twice
as long as the coverts, 3>4, 2=5; thus the wing is more
pointed. The tail is similar to that of S. pallida; but the
outer rectrices are 1!" shorter. It is darker and duller in
colour; upper parts greyish brown; tail and wings rather
darker, with light edges; superciliary stripe whitish; throat
pure white.”

156. SaLicaRIA PALLIDA, Eversmann, nec Ehr.; Severtzoff,
pp. 66, 129.

At page 129 Dr. Severtzoff writes as follows :—“ This bird
inhabits the eastern shores of the Caspian, the central part
of the Syr Darja, the Aris, Karatau, and the Thian-shan
mountains. Bill small; tarsus with seven scutelle; tail
nearly even; quills 3>4>5>6>2>7, the 3rd, 4th, and 5th
nearly equal, the Ist short, but twice as long as the coverts ;
upper parts yellowish brown ; superciliary stripe whitish and
reaching from the base of the bill to the eye; underparts

H
|
|
j
i
ae
AMIE

fait
!
ty

655 SS
=

a brs Ee, =. — x : nae a f =
; = 7 = a. a aS ee - - =
Sos = 3 <= <E=> : © ~ = $<
irr 7 ~ = — ~ oe oe te» PS ee ee =_ = ? a io? == nee ™ > —_
_ © wy teers ee IS be ee Se $ - > = 7 ——. - ~ —
—— -. — = - oe = SE as = = > se eee ae Se ee ee ie ea eee ae
= Pe = “ac » = . _ -- -- ~ : . , .

88 Mr. H. E. Dresser’s Notes on

white tinged with brown; wings and tail dark olive-brown,
with light edges. g. Total length in skin 5” 1", in flesh

5” 5! wing 2” 5", tail 2! 2", culmen 4/", 9. Total length

4! $! in skin, 5" 3! in flesh, tail 1” 9!", wing 2" 4"?

157. SanicariA TAMARICETI, Severtzoff, pp. 66, 131.

Range. Same as No. 154.

At page 131 Dr. Severtzoff describes this bird as follows :—
“ Bill large, broad, and like that of Hypolais; middle rec-
trices 14!" longer than the outside ones; lst primary longer
than the coverts, 8=4, these being the longest, 2=7, and
sometimes =6. ‘Total length 5” 3!'—5!" 5!" extent 7-7" 3!”,
wing 2! 42" 5! tail 2"-2" 1", culmen 44/5", tarsus 9!”

158. SaLicaRIA MODESTA, Severtzoff, pp. 66, 129.

Range. Same as No. 154.

At page 129 the followmg description is given :—“ Bill
small, head large, legs long, tarsus covered with eight scu-
tellz, lst primary rather longer than the coverts, 3=4, 2=7,
the 4th tail-feather the longest, the central one 1” shorter.
In coloration similar to S. odsoleta, but the light eye-streak
passes 2! beyond the eye.”

159 SaLicaRiA CONCOLOR, Severtzoff, pp. 66, 180.

Range. Same as No. 154.

This bird is described (p. 180) as follows :— Bill slightly
larger than in S. gracilis ; outer tail-feather 32” shorter than
the central ones; Ist primary rather longer than the coverts,
3=4,2=6.” Lighter in colour than S. gracilis.

160. Hypotais cauicata (Licht.).

Salicaria scita, Eversm.; Severtzoff, pp. 66, 130.

Horizontal range. Breeds rarely in districts III. and IV.

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 2 and 3, rarely in the
former.

Dr. Severtzofi’s specimens, labelled S. scita, are, I find,
undoubtedly referable to H. caligata; so I do not translate
his description ; but at page 130 he describes a subspecies

under the-name of Salicaria scitopsis as follows :—‘‘ Smaller

than S. scita; bill thinner; tail shorter, the 4th rectrix the

IO Fee at a .

‘ alle

Lari

a ee

SAP na,
PC en taal aa

Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan,’ 89

longest ; 1st primary twice as long as the coverts, 3=4=5 >
6>2>7; tarsus with eight scutelle; upper parts greyish
olive-brown ; underparts much lighter, shaded with yellow ;
breast and flanks darker; wings and tail olive-brown, with
lighter edges. Total length in flesh 4! 8!", wing 2" 3", tail
1" 9", culmen 34!", tarsus 8’, Thus this bird has the bill of
a Phylloscopus, the wings and tail of S. tamariceti, and the
colour of S. capistrata. Only one was obtained, on board
a steamer on the Caspian, on the 3rd of May, 1859.”

161. LocustTELLA LUSCINIoIDES (Savi).

Cettia fusca, Severtzoff, pp. 66, 131.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts III. and IV.

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1 and 2.

Dr. Severtzoff describes this under the above name as a di-
stinct species (p. 131) ; but he now informs me that he has, by
comparison, found it to be nothing but Savi’s Warbler.

162. Brapyprervs certit (La Marm.).

Cettia albiventris, Severtzoff, pp. 66, 131.

Horizontal range. Breeds in district IIT.

Vertical range. Breeds in district 3, and is found in district
2 on passage.

Although this was described (p. 181) by Dr. Severtzoff as
distinct from our European Cetti’s Warbler, he now informs me
that he does not think it differs constantly, and that the name
should sink into asynonym. He further states that it is the
same as the somewhat larger eastern form of Cetti’s Warbler,
usually known under the name of Cettia orientalis, but which,
he adds, cannot be specifically separated. When here, Dr.
Severtzoff examined Mr. Hume’s Cettia stoliczke, a specimen
of which was sent over here to be figured ; and in his notes he
writes that it is identical with his Cettia albiventris, and is
therefore, in his opinion, a bad species.

A mere variety or local form of the present species is the
following, viz. :—

163. CETTiA SCALENURA, pp. 66, 131.
Horizontal range. Breeds and occurs on passage in dis-
trict LII.

|
|
|
i
i r
i '
i)
j |
i |
} { j
1} |
|. i
A i)
i] f |
Hi} if
iy , it
(Minas
Wy |
i |
j
I |
}
I
fi a}
H ;
i {
k i}
Hy
I ee
ta \
{ | |
ih {
i ;
ML Pika i
WHEL et :
1 jj }
i
We, be
|
} {
Pa oo ay
} 1)
aH
i) {
Tho i
LN
| bat ia
1h ee }
t
EAD
Hy Ue e
nee, |
Hit) '
PE Le
hittt t 1
vt ;
AA ae
| “ft
ee AF {
WES al
We
Gt PEt y
su
HAE tf be
Hilige Melee M4
me YE hoe) pl
| te
i
i ;
f a
Ay oa
i ae f
HUE Bi A f
H r
WT Me 4
YN id) S) elas Wee Bee
Be Wee | set.
WES Ue
Hb ey
| ide | Oe ramet g.
i kyr ay
| 4
eae A ies bg
Ne he ee j
tf Fi
WE cea
I) 4 fi .
| ih set &
Wiha By 1
Nig
)
NH) '
i 4.
iy }
|

> _ = = = - ie pf
= —= ~ = : = —_
—e Ss = oe ——S oS —-
- a = gS = = 3
= Ses x ¢ = ana * at ee > :
i Pe ~ is ‘a > ~ eg ee A Bhd :
—- aes on ee oo S — = ~~ St ee peo
4 ~ eft . pane Sooo

G a ss ox

90 Mr. H. E. Dresser’s Notes on

Vertical range. Breeds and is found on passage in dis-
trict 2.

I need not transcribe Dr. Severtzoff’s description of this
bird (p. 181), as he sums the whole matter up in a note he
has given me, in which he states that it is only “a Uralo-
-Kirghis, north-eastern variety of Cetti’s Warbler, which can-
not well be made out from a written description, but appeared
to be distinct by comparison with Spanish specimens in the
Berlin Museum, collected by Herr A. von Homeyer.” This
appears therefore to be a somewhat doubtful species.

At page 182 Dr. Severtzoff describes, under the name of
Cettia nigricans, what he now informs me is merely a small
rather dark form of Locustella fluviatilis. Ineed not, there-
fore, reproduce his detailed description, but only give the mea-
surements as follows :—First primary equal in length to the
coverts, 2nd quill longest, 3rd 3! shorter than the 2nd,
4th 2 shorter than the 2nd. Total length in skin 5" 3!", in
flesh 5" 8", wing 2! 9!", tail 2", tarsus 9!", culmen 5!’, The
specimen in question flew on board a steamer near the eastern
shore of the Caspian, on the 21st August, 1859, and was
captured.

164. ACROCEPHALUS SCH@NOBENUS (L.).

Calamoherpe phragmitis, Severtzoff, p. 66.

Horizontal range. Breeds and occurs on passage in dis-
fiche Ll.

Vertical range. Breeds in district 1, and occurs on pas-
sage in district 2.

165. LocustELLa Na&via (Bodd.).

Acridiornis locustella, Severtzoff, p. 66.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I., II., and III.
Vertical range. Breeds in districts 2, 3, and 4.

166. LocustTELua LANCEOLATA (Temm.).

Acridiornis lanceolata? (A. straminea, nob.), Severtzoff,
p. 66.

Horizontal range. Is found on passage, and possibly breeds,
in districts I. and IIT.

Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan, 91.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in district 2, and pos-
sibly breeds in district 3.

167. AccENTOR ATROGULARIS, Brandt; Severtzoff, p. 66.

Horizontal range. Occurs in winter in districts I., II., III.,
and IV., and breeds in districts I. and IT.

Vertical range. Is found in winter in districts 2 and 3, and
breeds in district 4, and possibly in 3.

168. ? AcCENTOR MONTANELLUS (Pall.).

Accentor fulvescens, Severtzoff, pp. 66, 182.

Horizontal range. Is found in winter in districts I., II.,
and III., and breeds in districts I. and II.

Vertical range. Occurs in winter in districts 2 and 3—rarely,
however, in the former; breeds in district 4, and possibly in
district 5, as it is found there in summer.

Dr. Severtzoff’s description of this bird suits closely my
specimens of A. montanellus, and I should say that the
species found by him must be this; but not having compared
examples from Turkestan, I cannot speak with certainty,
as there may possibly be some trifling difference in the
Turkestan bird.

169. AccenToR aLtaicus, Brandt; Severtzoff, pp. 66, 133.
Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I., I., and IV.
Vertical range. Breeds in districts 4 and 5.

Dr. Severtzoff states that the present species somewhat
resembles Accentor alpinus, being its representative in Central
Asia. He describes it as follows :—‘ Crown, nape, cheeks,
sides and back of the neck, and fore and hind parts of the
back greyish brown with an olive tinge; centre of the back,
scapulars, and wings blackish, with rust-coloured edges ; tail-
feathers, except the central ones, with white ends on the inside
of the feathers; throat white, with a narrow black stripe
below ; the sides marked with black spots; below the black
stripe is a brownish bar across ; rest of the underparts rust-
coloured, with broad white edges; centre of the abdomen white;
ist primary very short, 4>3>2>5, or2=3=4; central rec-
trices 14!shorter than the outer ones. Male—total length
7", extent 11", wing 3” 7", tail 2" 4!", tarsus 9”, middle toe

92 Mr. H. E. Dresser’s Notes on

6", culmen 5!, breadth of bill 23", height 2”. Female—total
length 6" 6", wing 3” 5", tail 2” 2", culmen 43", height of
bill 12". Accentor alpinus is greyer ; the lower throat is pure
grey; breast, flanks, and underparts grey, with rust-coloured
shaft-spots ; the upper parts are similarly coloured to those
of the above species; only the scapulars have rust-coloured
edges, and the quills and tail-feathers have grey edges, the
Srd quill is the longest, the 4th=2nd. The bill of A. altaicus
is black, the legs yellowish brown, whereas in Accentor alpinus
the upper mandible is brown, and the lower one yellow.
170. AccENTOR MONTANELLUS (Pall.) ; Severtzoff, p. 66.

Horizontal range. Breeds in district I.
Vertical range. Breeds in districts 3 and 4.

171. Reeutvus cristatus, Koch ; Severtzoff, p. 66.

Horizontal range. Breeds and is found in winter in districts
I., I1., and III. ;

Vertical range. Occurs in winter in districts 2 and 8, in
the latter also on passage, and breeds in district 4.

172.. Parus BoKHARENSIS, Licht.; Severtzoff, p. 66.

Horizontal range. Resident in districts I., II., III., and IV.

Vertical range. Resident in districts 1 and 2, rare in the
latter.

173. Parus masor, L.; Severtzoff, p. 66.
Horizontal range. Resident in district I.

174. Parus FLAVIPECTUS, sp. noy., Severtzoff, pp. 66, 133,
pl. vii. fig. 7. :

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I., IL., III., and IV.,
rarely, however, in district I., and is found in winter in dis-
tricts ITI. and IV.

Vertical range. Occurs in winter, though rarely, in district
2, and breeds in district 3, where possibly it is resident.

This is an undoubtedly good species, as I am able to state
from an examination of specimens presented to me by Dr.
Severtzoff. It is well figured by him, and may be described
as resembling Parus cyanus, but smaller, and having the
breast yellow. Total length 5” 7", wing 2" 5!", tail 2" 5!"
tarsus 6!, middle toe 4!", hind claw 24", culmen 8",

Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan, . 2S

175. Parus cyanvs (Pall.); Severtzoff, p. 66.
Horizontal range. Resident in district I.

Vertical range. Occurs in winter in district 2, and is resi-
dent in district 3.

176. PaRrus RUFIPECTUS, sp. nov. Severtzoff, pp. 66, 134.

Horizontal range. Resident in district I.

Vertical range. Occurs in winter in districts 3 and 4, and
breeds in district 4.

At page 134 Dr. Severtzoff writes as follows :—~ Parus
ater, var. rufipectus, differs from the European species by
the reddish brown coloration of the back and underparts ;
the breast, axillaries, and under tail-coverts are yellowish ;
the abdomen, flanks, and a broad stripe over the back light
greyish brown: other parts as in P. ater; crown, hind neck,
fore part of the back, and throat metallic black ; centre of
the back, shoulders, and rump bluish grey; quills and tail-
feathers black, with bluish edges; wing-coverts tipped with
brownish white, forming two bands across the wing; the
three innermost secondaries white ; bill black ; legs lead-grey ;
1st primary twice as long as the coverts, 2=10, 3>7, 4=5
=6, or 2=8, 3=6, 4=5; the outer and two central rec-
trices are 1! shorter than the rest of the tail-feathers. Total
length 5", extent 7" 4", wing 2! 44", tail 2" 1", tarsus 64",
middle toe 34!", culmen 34!”

177. Parus ruFonucHaLis (Blyth).

Parus melanolophus, Gould ; Severtzoff, p. 66.

Horizontal range. Resident in district IV.

Vertical range. Resident in district 3, and possibly in dis-
trict 4, where it breeds.

No description is given of this bird; but in the MS. notes
inserted by Dr. Severtzoff in my copy of his work he has
struck out the name melanolophus, and inserted in its place
that of rufonuchalis, without further comment.

178. Parus soncarus, Severtzoff, p. 66.

Horizontal range. Resident in district I.

Vertical range. Is found in winter in districts 3 and 4, and
breeds in the latter district.

= rere

rE EE

<==

94 Prof. Newton on the Assignation

This bird, Severtzoff states, belongs to the same group as
Parus palustris, P. borealis, P. cinctus, and P. lugubris, but
differs from the last two as much as from P. palustris. The
crown, nape, and hind neck are black, this colour extending
to the centre of the back; throat black, the feathers edged
with brownish white in autumn; cheeks dirty white, tinged
with greyish brown; back, rump, shoulders, lower throat,
breast, abdomen, and flanks, as well as the under tail-coverts,
brownish, darkest on the shoulders, and lightest, almost white,
near the black patch on the throat; wing-coverts and the
three innermost secondaries dark brownish grey, with broad
light edges, the remaining quills and the rectrices blackish
brown ; bill black, with greyish brown end and margins ;.
legs dark bluish lead. First primary short, 4=5>6>7>3
>8>9>2>10, or 4=5=6>7>3>8>9>10>2; the 4th and
5th rectrices longest, the central ones being 1! shorter, and
the outer ones 2!” shorter. Total length 5” 6!, extent 9",
wing 2! 8!" tail 2" 5!” tarsus 74'”, middle toe 44!", hind claw
3! culmen 44!"

Tt inhabits the fir-forests on the Thian-shan range.

179. Panurvus BrARMIcuS (L.).
Panurus barbatus, Severtzoff, p. 66.
Horizontal range. Resident in districts I., II., and III.
Vertical range. Resident in districts 1 and 2.
['To be continued. |

XI.—On the Assignation of a Type to Linnean Genera, with
especial reference to the Genus Strix. By Atrrep Newron,
M.A., F.R.S., &c.

Tuat some of my brethren should demur to the opinion I
expressed a few years ago (Yarrell, British Birds, ed. 4, vol. i.
p. 150) as to the species which ought properly to be con-
sidered the type of the Linnean genus Strix, was a thing
fully expected by me; indeed I had anticipated a stronger
resistance than any which my views have hitherto encoun-
tered. So far as I am aware, the only opposition offered
thereto lies in the comparatively mild protest of the editor of

co lig some Se

RN alan erin en

of a Type to Linnean Genera. 95

‘The Ibis’ (1875, pp. 66, 67, footnote), and in one of the
papers by which Mr. Sharpe has enriched the well-endowed
literary history of the Accipitres (tom. cit. pp. 324-828).
Still the authority which each of these gentlemen wields, and
the learning which they both possess, is so great, that all must
feel that as much as can be said on their side of the question
has been said; and when I add that this has not shaken my
belief, I cannot but entertain a hope that I shall not be driven
from the position I found myself (not without considerable
reluctance) compelled to take up. But it seems to’me that
a fuller statement of the facts of the case than I had room
originally to make, may not be without its use to those who
perhaps may be halting between the two opinions; while
courtesy itself requires of me some reply to my friendly
critics. Besides this I have an error, which they have not
detected, to acknowledge, and, if possible, to repair; while,
furthermore, it appears to me that some advantage may fol-
low from a consideration of the method which should be
adopted in assigning a “type” to the genera of authors to whom
the notion of a type species, as we nowadays understand it,
was altogether strange. This last, indeed, may be said to
underlie the whole question I propose to discuss; and, having
an important general bearing, I proceed to take it first.
When the existing notion of a type species was first pro-
pounded, and when it became generally adopted, are matters
upon which I need not now enter, even if I felt myself com-
petent to treat of them. They may for the present be left
until some one shall write the history of systematic biology.
It will hardly be denied, I think, by any one having a mode-
rate acquaintance with the works of Linnzeus, that no such
notion was ever entertained by him, though one would sup-
pose that it must have presented itself to his mind, from the
fact that it was familiar to, and was almost constantly acted
upon by his contemporary, Brisson. Yet we may search the
writings of Linnzeus in vain not only for the word “ type,”
used in the meaning of modern systematists, but, if I mistake
not, even for any expression equivalent to it. It therefore
follows that extreme caution must be used in the assignation

96 Prof. Newton on the Assignation

of a type to any of his genera; and the only mode of avoid-
ing errors in so doing, is by making him the interpreter of
his own intentions. It is not that we have to put ourselves
in his place, but to imagine him put in ours, and called on
to show which he would consider his type species according
to modern ideas.

Fortunately this process is by no means so difficult to effect
as might at first sight appear; and, after some study, I think the
types of Linnzean genera can be determined to the satisfaction
of any reasonable mind, accurately in more than two thirds
of the cases, and within very narrow limits in several others.
All naturalists have long been accustomed to look upon Lin-
neeus as a great reformer; and so he unquestionably was; but
he showed himself in nothing greater than in the manner of
effecting his reforms. Wherever he could he built on ancient
foundations. No man could be more conservative than he in
retaining, when possible, an old name; and hence it only re-
quires some degree of attention to the works of his prede-
cessors, to hunt down almost every name used by him, and,
so far as ornithology is concerned, care and common sense
seem to be all that is wanted. When we find Linneus using
an old name, we generally find him citing the author from
whom he borrows it; and therefore the discovery of its origin
costs but little trouble; for we all know that the amount of
ornithological literature in his day was very small.

Of the 78 genera which Linneus, in the 12th edition of
his ‘Systema Nature,’ established for the class Aves, I can-
not find more than twelve the name of which he can be said
to have invented ; and I will not answer for it that the use of
some of these by prior or contemporary authors may not have
escaped me. Howbeit these twelve seem to be :—

Rhamphastos, Diomedea, — Mycteria, Didus,
Buceros, Phaeton, Cancroma, Numida,
Procellaria, Palamedea, Parra, Pipra.

All the rest are names adopted from his predecessors, by whom
the majority were used absolutely and in a specific sense.
When this was the case there can scarcely be a reasonable

of a Type to Linnean Genera. 97

doubt that Linneus, had he known our modern practice,
would have designated as the type of his genus that species
to which the name he adopted as generic had formerly been
specifically applied. This has long appeared to me such an
obvious truth, that I cannot but wonder at those who in-
vented an arbitrary rule for the selection of a Linnean
type*. It is true that there are some names which had
been used by the prze- Linnzan authors in a generic sense ; and
we know that in such cases they were very apt to distinguish the
different species by a numeral or other epithet ; but it is curi-
ous to find how few names of this kind were adopted by Lin-
neeus, not perhaps more than a dozen in all. Such are

Vultur, Gracula, Larus, Emberiza,
Falco, Mergus, Tetrao, Motacilla,
Psittacus, Colymbus, Columba, Parus.

Of course in most, or all, of these instances it would be hope-
less to attempt to fix the type accurately, though we may
do so approximately, as with Tetrao and Parus, and that
within very narrow limits.

However, the old names, previously used in a specific sense,
but taken and applied by Linnzus to his genera, form, as I
have said, the majority of his 78. The authors from whom
he adopted them, as proved by his reference to their works,
are Gesner, Belon, Aldrovandus, Clusius, Johnston, Brown,
Barrere, Klemm, Mcehring, Brisson, and perhaps one or two
others. It is, of course, an undoubted fact that with Lin-

* T refer particularly to the rule, followed to some extent by the late
Mr, G. R. Gray, which enjoined the selection of the first species named
in a genus as its type. It is needless to observe that though Mr. Gray
professed to regard this rule, in practice he was constantly doing other-
wise. I cannot help remarking that it seems to have been thought by
Linneus, and by others of his school, that all nature might be deployed
in a single linear series; and thus he arranged his species so that one genus
should follow naturally upon another. By this means the most normal
forms were of course placed in the middle, and the most aberrant at the
beginning and the end; so-that the effect of the rule which Mr. Gray ad-
mired would be that one of the most aberrant species of a genus would
often have to be considered its type.

SER. III.— VOL. VI. H

98 Prof. Newton on the Assignation

nus, and with him only at a late period of his life, begins
the binomial* method of nomenclature which we employ ; and
assuredly I have no desire to set aside, or even to impugn, that
system of terminology which naturalists have for more than
a century found so useful and have so generally adopted. But
it must not be forgotten that great men lived before Linneus ;
and every one who wishes to interpret him must study the
works by which he was so much guided. I have heard it
rumoured that the principle I am now advocating is of a
most revolutionary tendency, and that its effect will be
to upset the foundations of the so-styled “science” of no-
menclature. I would therefore beg a little space to see if this
be so or not. I have tried to find how that principle, if ac-
cepted, would work ; and here is the result.

According to this view, I take it that the type species of

* It surprises me to find that there are still some who write and speak
of the “binominal” method of nomenclature. A “binomial” method
signifies a method involving the use of two terms—that is, in biological
nomenclature, a generic and a specific term which, together, make up
the name of the object. A “binominal” method, as almost any dic-
tionary would tell us, would mean a method in which each object should
have two names. Unfortunately far too many species are in the strict sense
“binominal,” or even ‘multinominal ;” for there are comparatively few
which have not a synonym, or synonyms, as wellasaname. The hero
who was indifferently known as Ascanius or Iulus, the river called by
some Eridanus and by others Padus, may be each properly spoken of as
being “ binominis,” ¢. e. “binominal ;” but that appellation could not be
applied to Numa Pompilius or Aigos Potamos. Consider, too, the awk-
wardness of the work “‘ binominal” in the sense that some would use it.
We should have a “‘ binominal”’ name—a name, that is, having two names!
Now a “binomial name” is an expression grammatically and logically
correct, a name composed of two terms, just such a name as botanists and
zoologists use for the creatures they study and speak of. , But then it may
be objected that “binomial” is a hybrid word, and, accordingly, not to
be used by any writer who cares for the purity of his style. Such an ob-
jector, if he exists, ought in consistency to eschew such words as “ nomen-
clature” and “ terminology,” and certainly ought not to use such a bar-
barism as “polynominalism”! Sufficient to say that nomos had been
engrafted in Pliny’s time on the Latin tongue to render its composition
with 6:- classical or semiclassical; but even if this were not the case, who
could justly object to a word which has been in universal use since the
greatest of mathematicians bestowed it on the Binomial Theorem ?

56 Linnean genera may be, without fear of error, determined.

of a Type to Linnean Genera.

They are as follows :—

Genus. Type. Genus. Type.
Strix (of which more presently). Cancroma: C. cochlearia.
Lanius: L, excubitor. Ardea: A. cinerea.
Buphaga : B. africana. Tantalus : T. loculator.
Crotophaga: C. ani. Recurvirostra: R. avocetta.
Corvus : C. corax. Hematopus: _ H. ostralegus.
Oriolus : O. galbula. | Fulica: F’. atra.
Paradisea : P. apoda. | Parra: P. jacana.
Bucco: B. capensis. Rallus: R. aquaticus.
Cuculus : C, canorus. Psophia: P, crepitans.
Jynux: J. torquilla. Otis: O. tarda.
Picus: P. martius. Struthio: S. camelus.
Sitta: S. europea. Didus: D. ineptus.
Alcedo : A. ispida. | Pavo: P. cristatus.
Merops : M. apiaster. Meleagris : M. gallopavo.
Upupa: U. epops. | Crax: C. alector.
Certhia : C. familiaris. | Phasianus: P. colchicus.
Trochilus : T. colubris. | Numida: N. meleagris.
Alea: A. torda. | Alauda: A. arvensis.
Procellaria : P. pelagica. | Sturnus: S. vulgaris.
Diomedea : D. exulans. | Turdus: T. viscivorus.
Pelecanus: P. onocrotalus. |. Ampelis: A. garrulus.
Plotus: P. anhinga. | Loxia: L. curvirostra.
Phaeton: P. ethereus. | Tanagra: T. tatao.
Rhynchops: R. nigyra. _ Fringilla: FE’. celebs.
Sterna : S. hirundo. | Muscicapa: M. grisola.
Phcenicopterus: P. ruber. | Pipra: P. leucocilla.
Platalea : P. leucorodia. | Hirundo: H. rustica.
Mycteria : M. americana. Caprimulgus: C. europzeus.

The result does not seem to me so very subversive of cur-
rently accepted nomenclature. Out of the 56 genera in the
foregoing list, (excepting Striv, which I must treat in detail,)
only about three or four would appear to have, from my way
of regarding them, a type other than that commonly assigned
to them. Indeed I can fancy some of my readers exclaim-
ing, Why should all this fuss be made about a matter on which
ornithologists are generally agreed? My answer to this 1s,
that ornithologists have almost always acted upon the prin-
ciple I enjoin, and this is a strong point in its favour. The
few cases in which the principle has been departed from

100 Prof. Newton on the Assignation

are so few that they may be safely and wisely discarded for
the sake of uniformity and consistency. It is possible that
there may be some three or four more Linnean genera (but
certainly not half a dozen) in which, by the application of
this principle, the true type is discoverable; but even these,
supposing them all to go against the generally accepted view
(and it is, of course, by no means certain that they would),
could not disturb more than a very small number of genera
and ought not to flutter the most conservative of ornitho-
logists, while only by those (if unhappily there are such)
who have sinned against light and knowledge should the
principle be regarded with disfavour.

I now return to the genus Strix, which is the cause of these
tedious remarks, and first have to deal with Mr. Salvin’s note
(Ibis, 1875, pp. 66, 67). According to him I “truly” said
“that Stri# aluco is Brisson’s type of the Linnean genus
Strizv as restricted.” Now, unfortunately, I did not say this
truly; and herein lies the error I have to acknowledge. I
shall urge little or nothing in extenuation of my crime.
It would only protract the present paper to show how many
others, from Savigny to my critics, have fallen into it; but
error it undoubtedly is, as I hope to prove without fear of
— contradiction. |

The type assigned by Brisson (Orn. i. p. 500) to his genus
Strix (which is, saving the species removed to form his genus
Asio, also that of Linnzeus) is le Chat-huant. On that point
all will agree; and all will also agree that his Chat-huant, or
type of Strix, is, as Brisson’s excellent description shows, the
bird which we in England know as the Brown or Tawny Owl,
the species which has been frequently called Syrnium aluco,
and repeatedly figured under that name or some admitted
equivalent of it. But this species was not only described by
Brisson. He also gave a long list of references to other authors
whom he, rightly or wrongly, believed to have mentioned the
same bird. The only one of these with which we need now
trouble ourselves is the first, from the ‘ Fauna Suecica’ (p. 18)
—the edition of 1746 of course. Brisson correctly quotes Lin-
neus’s Short diagnosis of the latter’s “ No. 55,” with a refer-

of a Type to Linnean Genera. 101

ence tothat number. Turning thereto we further read,“ Ha-
bitat in sylvis frequens per Sueciam ;” and then, coming to the
second edition of the ‘ Fauna’ (1761), we have (p. 26) :—

Nile SURI Stridulanl wes |, Fn. 55.”

—this being Linneus’s mode of quoting the former edition of
his work, and one more addition :—

“ Svecis Skrik Uggla.”

Now no one can doubt what Linnzus meant by this bird.
His diagnosis may not be the most accurate ; but the “ Skrik
Uggla” of the Swedes, the Owl which is common in the
forests throughout Sweden—that is, except in the then little-
known north of that country—is just as surely our Brown or
Tawny Owl as Brisson’s “ Chathuant” is. Thus the last, or
Brisson’s type of Stria, is also the S. stridula of Linnzeus ; for
I need not say that in both of the subsequent editions of the
‘Systema Nature’ (10th and 12th) the same species retains
that name ; but I must add that if there be any truth in the
opinions I have above advanced, this, and this only, can be
interpreted as the Linnean type of the genus Sériz ; for, as
Linneus himself rightly states, itis emphatically the “ Strix”
of Gesner, of Aldrovandus, of Willughby, and of Ray.
Finally, to clinch the whole matter, Linneus himself asserts
in the 12th edition that it is the “ Strix” of Brisson.

In rectifying my error, I wish it were possible for me to prove
as clearly what the S. aluco of Linnzus really was; but the
matter does not very much signify, and it will be unnecessary
for me here to repeat each step of the investigation. <A very .
little trouble will show that this species is founded upon
an Owl which, he tells us (Gilandska och Gothlandska Resa,
p- 69), he, on the 5th of June, 1741, had an opportunity of
describing at the woodman’s (hos Skogwachtaren) at Ahrby,
in the south of Giland; and the description which he there
gives 1s but a briefer form of that which appeared five years
afterwards in the ‘Fauna.’ I express no very decided opinion ;
but my impression is that the bird was most likely a Barn-
Owl*, a species known to be rare in Sweden and its islands,

* He writes “ Remiges 1, 2. 3. sensim breviores.”” Now this is not ab-
solutely true of the Barn-Owl, wherein the second primary is longer than

102 Prof. Newton on the Assignation

but occasionally occurringthere. Had the bird been a Tawny
Owl, one would think he would have recognized its specific
identity with that which is so common in the Swedish woods.
Besides this, though in the 1746 edition of the ‘ Fauna’ he
had cited as the same as this bird the “ Ulula’ of Gesner,

Aldrovandus, Willughby, and Ray, in his subsequent edition —

of the same work (1761) he substituted for these references
the “ Aluco”’ of the last two authors, and of Albin, who had
in the mean time published a recognizable figure; and there
cannot be a doubt of their Aluco being the Barn-Owl. Be
that as it may, the S. aluco of Linneus is not (as I unfortu-
nately said it was) the type of his genus Sétriz, nor of Bris-
son’s, but the S. stridula is the type of both.

Now the evidence as to what must be deemed the original
type of the Linnean genus Série is either “ perfectly clear
and indisputable’’*, or it is not. From what I have above
urged I think it may be regarded asclear. One cannot doubt
what is meant by the Striv of Gesner, Aldrovandus, Wil-
lughby, Ray, and Brisson. Switzer, Italian, Englishmen,
and. Frenchman agree. Was the Swede, coming after them
and quoting them all, likely to have intended that a new
meaning should be attached to the word by his use of it with-
out indicating that such was the case? If an ornithologist
of the present day had the power of questioning Linneus as
to which species, according to modern notions, he would de-
signate the type of his genus Striz, who can doubt what his
answer would be? “ Quod semper, quod ubique, quod ab om-
nibus—id accept.” |

But supposing this view of the case to be disallowed, owing
to the difficulty of obtaining any answer from the great de-
parted, and the evidence as to the Linnean type be deemed
inconclusive, then, in the words of the British-Association
Codet, “the person who first subdivides the genus may affix

the first and third, which are equal; but the difference between all three
is not much. On the other hand, in the Tawny Owl the first primary
is very short, and the fourth is the longest.

* Rules of Zoological Nomenclature, § 5.

Tt Boe, eu.

of a Type to Linnean Genera. 103

the original name to any portion of it at his discretion, and
no later author has a right to transfer that name to any other
part of the original genus.’ This will bring about exactly
the same result ; for there is no question as to Brisson having
been the first to subdivide the genus. But, says the Editor
of ‘ The Ibis,’ “ does the rule which admits the additional Bris-
sonian gerera give Brisson any right to define other Linnzan
genera? We think not.” I think very differently. Where
is any limitation of Brisson’s rights in regard to genera ex-
pressed? His genera are brought in bya special enactment ;
but, once admitted, they are exactly on the same footing, to
stand or fall, as those of anybody else. His specific names,
we know, are rejected, but that is simply because he did not
adhere to the binomial system of nomenclature which we
adopt, and very rightly are they rejected. Had his book been
published a few years later, or had the Code enacted that the
10th edition of the ‘Systema’ should be the point of depar-
ture, there would have been no need to treat him exceptionally
as regards his genera. If the law is to be followed, it must
be followed in all things save such as are especialiy excepted ;
and of such excepted things there is in this case but one, the
matter of specific names. Why are Brisson’s privileges,
which, owing to his great merits, have been deservedly recog-
nized, to be pared down beyond the letter of the law? Mr.
Salvin’s principle appears to me to be not only arbitrary,
but contrary to the principle of all law, or English law at
least. It is well known that any statute of disabilities has
to be construed in the sense most favourable to the person
disabled ; and if Brisson’s specific names are disallowed, the
disability rests there, it can have nothing to do with his
generic divisions and their natural consequences.

But I am not sure that I am not here arguing needlessly.
I have already said that if Brisson’s book had been published
a few years later, there would have been no need for any ex-
ceptional treatment of him whatever. Now I once before
pointed out in this Journal (Ibis, 1865, p. 97, note) that an
edition of his work was published in 1788; and being thus
subsequent to the appearance of Linnzus’s twelfth edition,

104 On the Assignation of a Type to Linnean Genera.

the genera defined in it can stand of their own right from that
date, under the exact words of the rule.’ That this edition
exists, I believe there is no doubt, though I have never set
eyes on a copy. Had I done so, and found it to agree in
this respect with the edition of 1760, I should be sure that
the preceding paragraph was unnecessary ; but lacking the
opportunity of knowing whether this is the case or not,
I am unable to substantiate what would be absolutely
conclusive. }

And now to meet such of Mr. Sharpe’s objections as I have
not already, I trust, disposed of. It is clear that considerable
doubt must exist as to Linnzeus’s Strix aluco; and therefore
one cannot declare that his “‘ No. 9 is identical with No. 7.”
It is impossible that Brisson’s arrangement “influenced Lin-
nzeus in his classification ;”’ for Linneus had already divided
the Owls into “ Auriculate”’ and “ Inauriculate ” in the 10th
edition of his ‘Systema,’ written three years before* Brisson’s
work appeared ; but it is probable that both authors followed
the earlier systematists, Willughby and Ray, in this obvious
division. It is hardly consistent with fact to say of the genus
Striz that “no type had previously been assigned” until
Savigny designated S. flammea as such; for, even if Linnzus’s
type be disallowed, we have that of Brisson plainly determined,
and consequently Savigny was not “ perfectly justified” in
doing as he did, while, on the other hand, Fleming, in sepa-
rating S, flammea as the type of his new genus Aluco, and
restoring S. stridula to the genus Striv, was acting strictly
within rule. Of the praise which Mr. Sharpe awards to Sa-
vigny, I have only to say that perhaps, had the latter’s am-
bitious work been completed, we might possibly have hailed
him as a reformer of nomenclature superior to Linnzeus ; but
perhaps it is as well that the ‘ Oiseaux de Egypte et de la
Syrie’ remains a fragment; for no one can go over the long
list of references to ancient authors, on which most of his
decisions are based, without seeing that a large number of
them are, and must be, hypothetical in the highest degree.

* This edition was published in 1758; but the preface is dated 24th
May, 1757,

On the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 105

To sum up my answer to the objections made. I main-
tain :—

(1) That the type, according to the modern notion, of the
Linnean genus Strix, is clearly and indisputably S. stridula.

(2) That in subdividing a genus Brisson’s right to affix
its original name to the portion of it he chose is not affected
by his exceptional position as regards specific names, and that
the type of his restricted genus Sériz 1s also S. stridula.

(3) That should ornithologists, in the teeth of the law,
persist in disregarding this right, there is a strong proba-
bility, which may at any moment become a certainty, of its
being indefeasibly established without reference to any excep-
tion whatever.

Finally, if the first of these positions be good, there is no
need of the other two; for, according to our Code (§ 4) :—
“The generic name should always be retained for that por-
tion of the original genus which was considered typical by
the author.”

Magdalene College, Cambridge.
12th December, 1875.

XIT.—WNotes on the Birds of the Lower Petchora. By Hunry
SEEBOHM, F.Z.S., and Joun A. Harvie Brown.

Tue ornithology of the valley of the Petchora has remained
up to the present time, if not altogether unknown, at least
undescribed. The geology, botany, and ethnology of the dis-
trict have been described by Keyserling, Schrenk and Cas-
tren; but nothing has been published upon the birds of
the Petchora. We ascertained in Archangel that Hencke
and Hoffmannsegg visited the great river, and sent consign-
ments of skins and eggs toa dealer in Dresden, through whom
some rare eggs (doubtless from this district) found their way
to Dunn and were distributed amongst English collectors.
In consequence of the trade-jealousy of the dealers, these eggs
were sold without authentication, and of course possess no
scientific value whatever. We have been unable to ascertain
that either of the above-named ornithologists‘has ever written

.- <=

=
ae
aS

n= ee ee ee
» SS ee fore > 2 ate
> ip en ae ue

a
——S
ae :

106 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

any thing upon the birds of the Petchora. When we planned
our excursion to the valley of the great river we looked upon it
as virgin ground. In St. Petersburg we learned that Dr.
Pelzam visited the Petchora last year to collect for the mu-
seum at Kasan; but we were afterwards told in several towns
and villages where we stayed, that he spent most of his time
in dredging, and did not pay much attention to the ornitho-
logy of the country.

We left London on 2nd March, and arrived at Ust Zylma on
14th April. The ground was covered with from two to three
feet of snow; and winter, z. e. frost or snow-storm, continued
until 7th May. Up to this date we only succeeded in iden-
tifying seventeen species of birds. From 8th to 15th May
we had spring; 7. e. the sun was powerful enough to thaw
the snow during the day-time, but it generally froze again at
night. During these eight days migratory birds began to
arrive much more rapidly, and we succeeded in adding thirteen
to our list. On 16th May we suddenly plunged into mid-
summer; the snow melted lke butter upon hot toast, and
the river began to rise rapidly. We shot new species of mi-
gratory birds on almost every excursion we made, and by the
20th May we increased our list of birds from thirty, at which
it stood on the 15th, to fifty. By the 21st May the Petchora
had risen nearly thirty feet in height ; and on that day the ice
on the great river broke up, and marched past Ust Zylma in
a stream a mile and a half wide, at the rate of four miles an
hour for ten days, during which we added another score of
birds to our list. |

We gave the ice ten days’ start, and then followed it down
the river, stopping frequently on the islands to collect. During
these ten days we explored the forests in the neighbourhood
of Ust Zylma, and made our excursion to Habariki, and
succeeded in identifying fifteen more species of birds.

We finally bade goodbye to Mons. Znaminski and our other
kind friends in Ust Zylma on the 10th June. The first five-
and-twenty miles are a tolerably straight run of broad river.
Then come a hundred miles of broad river full of islands, a
sort of elongated delta, which the arctic circle cuts nearly in

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 107

the centre. This is followed by a hundred miles of true delta,
ending in a further seventy-five miles of submerged delta or
lagoon, bounded by the range of islands called the Golievski
banks, where the Petchora enters the Arctic ocean between
the promontory of Russki Zavarot and the island of Varandai.
We made Alexievka our headquarters, occupying some of the
houses belonging to the Petchora 'Timber-trading Company.
The voyage occupied ten days, during which we added fifteen
more birds to our list. We remained six weeks at Alexievka,
making numerous visits to the neighbouring islands and to
the tundra, and extending our excursion to the mouth of the
river, adding about another dozen fresh species to the list of
birds. On 2nd August we sailed from Alexievka in the
schooner ‘Triad,’ 149 tons register, chartered with larch to
Cronstadt, and landed at Elsinore after a passage of thirty-five
days.

The whole of the north of Russia through which we sledged
is one vast forest of spruce, Scotch fir, and larch, with oc-
casionally birch and willow. Now and then we came upon
an oasis of cultivated land surrounding a village; and occa-
sionally we crossed a flat open plain which would doubtless
be a swamp in summer, too wet for trees to grow upon. The
country is gently undulating, with no hills of any magni-
tude. The timber gradually lessened in size as we proceeded
northward, and finally ceased altogether soon after we had
crossed the arctic circle. We then came upon the tundra,
a dreary flat extent of country reaching to the sea—not a
dead flat, but a gently undulating moor, an arctic prairie, a
Siberian tundra, with occasionally distant bluffs upon the
horizon. The east bank of the Petchora is generally a steep
cliff of mud, clay, gravel, sand, or turf, but never rock,
rising sometimes sixty or seventy feet. The foot of this cliff
is sometimes stony; and now and then we came upon a
boulder upon the tundra, probably dropped there by some
iceberg during the glacial period. In the bed of the Petchora,
before the flood came, we sometimes picked up limestone and
other fossils washed down from the interior; but the whole
country is obviously of diluvial origin. | Occasionally the

108 Messrs. H. Seebohm and.J. A. Harvie Brown on

banks are low swampy land, covered, like the islands of the
delta, with dwarf willow. These islands, as well as the swamps
near the shore, are three to four feet under water when the
river is swollen by the rapidly melted snow. The shores of
the delta, as well as of the lagoon, are strewn with drift-
wood, trees of all sizes from the inland forests, squared balks
from the stores of the Petchora trading-company, and spars
of luckless ships that have been wrecked upon the coast.
Some of these piles of drift-wood lie far inland, and are over-
grown with centuries of moss, suggesting the idea that a gra-
dual upheaval of the land is taking place, or that ages ago the
breaking up of the ice upon the Petchora was attended with
higher floods than are experienced now. The west bank of
the river is flat as far as the delta, and is in some places
flooded for many miles inland when the ice breaks up. We
had left the forests before the spring flowers were out; but on
the tundra they almost rivalled the alpine flora in their abun-
dance and brilliancy, especially on the banks of the great
river. The tundra is full of lakes, large and small, generally
with steep banks of peat, sometimes with flat banks of rushy
grass, and rarely of sand. In some places the lakes seem
to have been almost dried up, or choked with coarse grasses,
rushes, and carices, and have become swamps, with frequently
a little open water in the middle. The tundra is gay with
many-coloured lichens, mosses, and liverworts, of which the
well-known reindeer-moss is the most abundant. As soon
as the long winter snow has disappeared, there is no lack of
food for fruit- and seed-eating birds. Last year’s crowberries
and cranberries, preserved by the frost for nearly seven
months, were common enough everywhere ; and early in July
the white flowers of the cloudberry and the red flowers of the
arctic strawberry were very brilliant. The delicious cloud-
berry, the ‘maroshka’ of the Russians, and the ‘moltebeere’ of
the Norwegians, is undoubtedly the fruit of the tundra par
excellence, and deserves to be better known in this country.
There was no heath; but the pale magenta flowers of Andro-
meda polifolia represented it very fairly. An aromatic Rho-
dodendron-like dwarf shrub (Ledum palustre) was common,

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 109

as well as the creeping birch. In the more sheltered hollows
dwarf-willow copses gave variety to the scene.

The short arctic summer on the tundra must be a mil-
lennium for insect-eating birds. Mosquitoes abounded to such
an extent that life without a ‘komarnik,’ or mosquito-veil,
would probably have been simply unbearable, if not impos-
sible. We were also obliged to wear cavalry-gauntlets to
protect our hands. Our gloves and veils were a complete
protection; but we suffered very much from the heat and
closeness. Fortunately, however, we frequently had a few
days’ grace. A cold north-east wind came down from the
arctic ice; the mosquitoes vanished like magic; and we were
often compelled to put on our fursagain. We were obliged to
take active exercise to keep ourselves warm; but we were
only too glad that the plague of mosquitoes was for the time
stayed.

We found most of the birds in the valley of the Petchora
to be somewhat local, though perhaps scarcely so much so as
they were observed to be in the valley of the Dwina by Alston
and Harvie Brown. Even on the comparatively monotonous
tundra we found this to be the case; and we soon gave names
to the different sorts of ground. The dry grassy hills are the
Shore-Lark ground. The dead flat bog intersected with tus-
socky ridges is the Grey-Plover ground. The swampy marsh
covered with long grass is the Reeve-ground. Ifin the centre
of this there 1s any open water, it becomes Phalarope-ground.
If the grass is shorter and more tangled and knotted it be-
comes Dunlin-ground; and if this short grassy swamp is.
sprinkled over with tussocks of turf covered with moss and
flowers, then it becomes Lapland-Bunting or Red-throated-
Pipit ground. When the tussocks are close together, and
the swampy ground is almost hidden, or traceable only by
rows of cotton-grass, then we called it Little-Stint ground.
If we came upon a thicket of dwarf willow on the tundra, we
expected to find a brace of Willow-Grouse or a pair of Wood-
Sandpipers. The sandy shore of a lake was generally fre-
quented by Ring-Dotterel. The dense willow thickets on the
islands always swarmed with Yellow-headed Wagtails ; and if

110 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

the willows were few and far between, we almost always found
abundance of Temminck’s Stints.

The following list of the birds which we identified 1s neces-
sarily very meagre. It is impossible to exhaust the ornitho-
logy of any district in a single season. In a tract of country
extending three hundred miles north and south, the varieties
of situation, temperature, &c. are great. If we had remained
during the summer in the forests, we should no doubt have
added largely to our list of forest-birds; on the other hand,
if we had pushed on to Varandai and the sea-coast, we should
have met with many Sea-ducks and other birds. There is
abundant scope for future work ; and we hope that other field-
naturalists will be encouraged by our great success, and take
up the running where we have left it off.

AQUILA CHRYSAETOS (L.).

Hauiartus aupiciiia (L.).

We frequently saw Eagles both at Ust Zylma and on our
journey down the river. On the tundra we saw one near
Alexievka, and another near Dvoinik. The former species we

identified at Habariki, and the latter on various occasions.

Panpion HALIaETus (L.).

The only Osprey we identified flew overhead at Habariki,
and when fired at dropped a large bunch of damp moss, which
doubtless it was bearing away to its nest. A nest, presumed
to be of this species, was seen in the distance, about 15 feet
from the top of an almost branchless larch in the same place.

Butro tacorus (Gm.).

We only saw the Rough-legged Buzzard once, a fine light-
coloured male, sitting on the branch of a willow on the banks
of the Petchora, about 40 miles north of Ust Zylma. We
shot him as we silently drifted past, about midnight.

FAa.Lco PEREGRINUS, Gmel.

The first we saw of this species was on the 13th May, at
Ust Zylma, the same day upon which we first saw Ducks. A
week later we visited the great feeding-grounds of the Ducks
on the banks of the river Zylma, and there also met with the

the Birds of the Lower Petchora, 11]

Peregrine. We did not see it again till we found several pairs
breeding on the steep clay banks of the river Petchora, at Sta-
navoialachta. We had a fresh egg brought to us at Ust
Zylma by a Samoyede on the 27th May; and we found two
nests, with eggs considerably incubated, on the 27th June.

Fatco suspsuteo, L.
We shot a fine male Hobby at Habariki on the 5th June.

Fatco zsaton, Tunstall.

The first Merlin we saw was on the 5th May. Their fa-
vourite food seemed to be Snow-Buntings; and they timed
their arrival about the date when the peasants began to sledge
out the manure on to the frozen snow, and the Snow-Bunt-
ings were able to find food m the fields. As long as the Snow-
Buntings remained, the Merlins could be found in some num-
bers; but after the former had left we only saw one solitary
Merlin, flying northward on the 28th May.

ASTUR PALUMBARIUS (L.).

The only example of the Goshawk we saw was shot near
the river Yorsa on the 13th June. It was disturbed in a dense
alder-thicket in the act of devouring a female Widgeon.

ACCIPITER Nisus (L.).

We only identified one Sparrow-Hawk, which was shot on
the 29th May, whilst carrying off a Tree-Sparrow from a
farm-yard in Ust Zylma.

Circus cyaneEus (L,).

We saw the first Hen-Harrier on the 24th May, and con-
tinued to see them almost daily as long as we remained at
Ust Zylma. We occasionally met with them on our voyage
down the river, and on the tundra as far north as Stana-
voialachta.

Surnia NycTea (L.).

The first Snowy Owl was seen by us on the 10th May at
Ust Zylma. We saw them occasionally in the neighbourhood
afterwards as long as the frost continued. We did not meet
with the species again until we visited the tundra at Dvoinik.

112 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

Asio ACCIPITRINUS (Pall.).
We only saw four Short-eared Owls—the first on the 23rd
May, at Ust Zylma, and the last about 60 miles down the

river.

Buso 1gNavvs, Forst.
We did not meet with this Owl, but twice saw skins of birds
shot near Ust Zylma.

Dryocorus Martius (L.).
- Piottuch chased one of these birds for an hour or more on
an island of the Petchora, near Ust Zylma; and we once
or twice recognized its cry inthe woods; but we did not suc-
ceed in obtaining a specimen.

Picus minor, L.
This species is not uncommon in the birch-forests, as far
north as the latter extend.

Picus rRipacty us (L.).

The Three-toed Woodpecker is not so common as the pre-
ceding ; but we occasionally saw it in the birch-forests. On
the 14th June we took a nest, with newly hatched young, in
a birch tree at Chuvinski. We only met with it once in the
pine-forests at Habariki; but the larch trees, which composed
a considerable portion of the timber growth at that locality,
had the bark completely riddled with holes, made either by
this or some other species of Woodpecker. ‘These larch trees
were perfectly sound to the core, as we had abundant oppor-
tunity of proving when they were cut down for firewood.

Cucuus canorvs, L.

We first heard. the Cuckoo on the 3rd June. It appeared
to be not uncommon near Ust Zylma and at Habariki; but we
did not meet with it north of the river Yorsa.

Corvus corax, L.
Ravens were abundant at Ust Zylma during the whole time
of our stay there; and young birds were brought to us on the
2nd June. We afterwards met with the species, but only
rarely, as far north as Vassilkova, near Alexievka.

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 113

Corvus cornix, L.

The Hooded Crow is one of the commonest residents in
every town and village in Russia through which we passed,
becoming gradually scarcer north of Ust Zylma. We were
told that at Gorodok* it is only a summer migrant, arriving
about the 10th May. At Alexievka we only occasionally saw
it. In the neighbourhood of Ust Zylma it breeds in the
forests. The first eggs were brought to us on the 30th May.

Corvus FrueiLecus, L.
We had one specimen brought to us at Ust Zylma on the
17th May. This was the only example we saw during our trip.

CoRVUS MONEDULA, L.

We found this bird common, as far as Mezen, in the villages.
The only examples which we saw further east were a solitary
pair, one of which we shot, at Ust Zylma on the 3rd May.
Piottuch told us that it is only during the last four or five
years that the Jackdaw has appeared at Mezen, but that it is
now a resident there. Many of the birds we saw were very
white on the neck, being possibly the Corvus collaris of some
authors.

Pica rustica (Scop.).

This is one of the commonest resident birds in North Russia,
becoming still more frequent towards the east. At Ust Zylma
they are very abundant; but we found them scarcer further
north, as the villages become smaller and further apart. We
did not see any Magpies north of Gorodok, where, however,
we were told the bird is found all the yearround. We found
them building in the small pines near Ust Zylma, and begin-
ning to lay early in May.

PERISOREUS INFAUSTUS (L.).

The Siberian Jay is not rare throughout the pine-forests of
North Russia through which we passed. ‘They are, however,
somewhat difficult to find in early spring. When engaged in

* This is the Pustozero of Purchas (Purchas’s ‘ Pilgrimes,’ vol. iil.
chap. viii.); and it is known at Mezen and Archangel by its true name,
Pustozersk. On the Petchora the only name recognized is Gorodok, or
“the town.”

SER, III.—VOL. VI. I

114. Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

incubation they are very retiring and silent, frequenting the
thickest parts of the forests, except when engaged im feeding,
when they may be seen on the roads or at the forest station-
houses. After the young can fly, the parents become bolder
and more noisy, and show themselves more freely. We did
not meet with the species north of Habariki. A nest and
eggs were brought to us at Ust Zylma on the 27th April;
and we obtained young birds well grown in the beginning of
June, at which time the old birds are moulting their wing-
and tail-feathers.

Passer pomeEsticus (L.).

The distribution of the House-Sparrow in North Russia is
somewhat curious, it being generally confined to the larger
towns. In the neighbourhood of Archangel, however, it ap-
pears to be quite as abundant in the villages of the delta of
the Dvina as it is in the town itself, and almost entirely sup-
plants the next species. Eastward we'did not meet with it
until we reached Ust Zylma, where we first obtained it on the
18th May, though its presence was suspected in smaller num-
bers at the time of our arrival on the 15th April. About the
middle of May there must have been a considerable accession
to their numbers, though they apparently confined them-
selves to the vicinity of a part of the town occupied by the
houses of the richer inhabitants, the House-Sparrow being
rather fond of good living. Northwards it is plentiful at
Kuya, and apparently as numerous as the next species. Only
stragglers were obtained further north, at Alexievka, which
was the northernmost point where we found them.

The extremely bright colouring of the males as compared
with all other specimens we have seen, is deserving of pass-
ing notice.

PassER MONTANUS (L.).

The distribution of the Tree-Sparrow is almost the converse
of that of the House-Sparrow, it being found for the most part
in the smaller villages, almost to the exclusion of the other
species. Curiously enough, however, it appears to be quite
absent from the small villages of the delta of the Dvina,

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 115

where it is replaced by the House-Sparrow. In the summer
of 1872, Alston and Harvie Brown did not obtain or see
a single example on the well-cultivated delta, nor in the
town of Archangel. In March this year, among the large
flocks of Sparrows frequenting the manure heaps and farm-
yards of Archangel, the Tree-Sparrow was represented by a
very small percentage. Hastwards it was found in greater or
less abundance in all the villages, and at Ust Zylma it was
seen in numbers. Northwards we met with it up to and
within the arctic circle, finding it plentiful at Kuya, where
it lived apparently in harmony with equal numbers of House-
Sparrows. It was absent from Alexievka; but we obtained a
solitary straggler as far north as Stanavoialachta. This bird
breeds in holes in the wooden houses. We never met with
it in the forests.

PYRRHULA VULGARIS, Temm.

In spring, before the snow melted, we found the Bullfinch
sparingly and in small flocks in the neighbourhood of the
forest-stations, where there was abundance of food. As the
season advanced they seemed to disperse through the woods,
without receiving any accession to their numbers. After the
snow was mostly gone, or only lying in the deep valleys and
hollows in the pine-woods, we only met with one male; and
we did not again see the species to the northward.

CARPODACUS ERYTHRINUS (Pall.).

We saw two examples only of the Scarlet Bullfinch, both
males, at Ust Zylma, on the 7th June, and we shot one of
them. The note uttered by these birds was high-pitched,
and may be rendered by the syllables tu-wit-tu-tui, uttered
at intervals. That heard by Alston and Harvie Brown at
Archangel in 1872, uttered by females of this species, was
a low Greenfinch-like single zh-zh-zh.

~ Corytuus ENUCLEATOR (L.).

We met with Pine-Grosbeaks at Ust Zylma for the first
time this season on the 24th May, and we were at first
quite deceived by their rich Thrush-like song. We thought
when we first heard it that we were going to find some one of

iil if |

IH
Monee t bat
WS 4
aa
PERT) |

bere it
i ce |
Wd
NT ga

}

a
HE By
Hi
Hi i
My BN |

116 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

the rare eastern Thrushes. We shot specimens also at Ha-
bariki, but did not see it to the north of that locality.

FRINGILLA MONTIFRINGILLA, L.

The first Bramblings made their appearance at Ust Zylma
about the 24th May, when we shot one and saw and heard
others. Afterwards we found them not uncommon as far
north as Abrémoff, some 20 miles within the arctic circle.
They were haunting the low islands, which are covered with
alder, birch, and willow, but principally those on which birch |
predominates. We find no entries in our journals of their
occurrence north of this point, though it is not improbable
that they are to be found in diminishing numbers up to the
limit of the birch-growth, some 40 miles further north, to near
Viski, at the head of the delta.

Linota RUFESCENS, Vieill.

Linota canzuscens, Gd.

Both these species of Redpoles are very abundant along the
Petchora valley. They remained in the town of Ust Zylma
in flocks up to the second week in May, and then dispersed
to their breeding-quarters in the woods. ‘The first eggs were
found on the 10th June; and the young of the latter species
were seen in the nest on the 13th June. Both the Com-
mon and Mealy Redpoles are found as far north as Stana-
voialachta.

EMBERIZA CITRINELLA, L.

The Yellowhammer is not uncommon south of Archangel,
in the opener parts of the roads, in March, but is much scarcer
to the eastward and northward later in the season. At no
time during our stay at Ust Zylma did we find it common,
although we shot a few specimens between the 20th April and
6th May, after which date we have no further record of its
occurring to the northward.

EMBERIZA PUSILLA, Pall.
We obtained the first example of the Little Bunting on the —
31st May; and we found them afterwards common all the way
down the river. They even reach the willow-swamps of the

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 117

delta around Alexievka, where, however, they are decidedly
rare. We never had any of their eggs brought in by the
Zyriani. The Little Bunting is fond of frequenting the mossy
and marshy open hollows in the forests around Habariki and
elsewhere in search of insects, in company with Wagtails
(B. viridis and M. alba), Temminck’s Stints, Fieldfares, Blue-
throated Warblers, and other species. They paired shortly
after arrival, as we found them mated on the 10th June.

EMBERIZA SCHENICLUS, L.

On the 15th May we got the first Reed-Buntings; and on
the 19th we found them abundant, frequenting the low alder
and birch forests on the banks of the river opposite Ust Zylma.
At Habariki they are less abundant, haunting the skirts of
the pine-woods and edges of the marshy lakes and overflows
from the river. Eggs were procured in the beginning of June
at the latter locality ; and we afterwards found them common
down the river, beyond the arctic circle ; beyond this, how-
ever, they became scarce. We traced them as far north as
Alexievka, where the Zyriani got eggs for us. Seebohm found
a nest of this bird built inside an old Fieldfare’s nest, in an
alder-swamp, nine feet from the surface of the water. The
bright clean plumage of these birds is worthy of passing
notice. They are much mealier than those found further
west.

PLECTROPHANES LAPPoNIcus (L.).

The handsome Lapland Bunting is one of the commonest
birds at Ust Zylma during migration. From the 18th May,
when we first saw them, till the 27th, they frequented the
fields behind the town, flying often in company with the
equally large flights of Shore-Larks, and mingling with them,
but just as commonly keeping in large independent com-
panies. The great body of the females appeared to arrive
somewhat later than the males, as the later flocks, when fly-
ing close past, exhibited fewer black heads and breasts. One
flock seen, and fired into, on the 27th, appeared to be com-
posed almost entirely of females.

We did not again meet with the Lapland Bunting after

118 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

the last-mentioned date until we found them scattered over
their great breeding-haunts on the northern tundras. Nests
and eggs were brought to us by the Zyriani on the 22nd
June—the nests invariably lined with feathers, which serve
to distinguish their contents from the eggs of Anthus cervi-
nus, the nest of which latter bird is lined with wiry grass, and
contains no feathers. By the 24th June the eggs were con-
siderably incubated ; and on the 6th July we found young
able to fly. The Lapland Bunting is essentially a bird of the
tundra, and is widely and numerously distributed over the
whole tundra-land as far as we went, viz. to Dvoinik, where
we obtained young birds. On one occasion we saw the species
on one of the willow-covered islands opposite Stanavoialachta,
a solitary example which may or may not have been breed-
ing there.

PLECTROPHANES NIVALIS (L.).

The Snow-Bunting is exceedingly abundant all the way
north and east from Archangel to Ust Zylma during the
spring; and great numbers of these lovely birds are caught by
the village boys in horsehair nooses, and sold at the rate of
100 for half a rouble; and very good eating they are. Large
flocks were feeding on the great manure heaps by the side of
the river Mezen, close to the town, in the beginning of
April; and they were even more abundant at Ust Zylma, in
the irregular streets and yards of the town, and on the hill-
slopes behind, where the snow had disappeared during the
partial thaws, and where manure had been sledged out and >
spread by the natives. By the 24th May nearly every Snow-
Bunting had disappeared from Ust Zylma.

It was not until long afterwards that we saw a few at
Dvoinik, where we secured the full-grown young on the 23rd
July, and also the old birds in full breeding-dress. They
were flying about and settling upon the great piles of drift-
wood close to the beach, which appeared to be a suitable
haunt ; but we cannot say whether they were reared there or
on the Pytkoff Mountains, some 15 miles inland.

During the migration we constantly saw Snow-Buntings

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 119

alight on trees, both singly and in flocks, and both on spruce-
firs, willows, and bare high larches. They perched freely,
and flew from tree to tree, alighting without the shghtest
hesitation. |

Nothing can be more beautiful than the evolutions of a
flock of these handsome birds as they drift with a high wind
like actual “ snow-flakes,” or struggle against it with flicker-
ing butterfly flight, uttering at the same time their musical
tinkling note.

ALAUDA ARVENSIS, L.

We only met with two examples of the common Sky-Lark—
the first at Ust Zylma, on the 22nd May, and the other, a
single bird also, at Viski, near the head of the delta, on the
17th June.

Orocorys ALPEsTRIS (L.).

The Shore-Lark was amongst the first of the earlier smaller
migrants to arrive. We saw and shot our first specimens on
the 10th May. A small party of seven or eight was haunting
the small spaces left bare by the melting of the snow by a
rapid sun-thaw, on an island opposite Ust Zylma. A day or
two later they were seen in larger flocks; and they soon be-
came very plentiful around the town, and continued to be so
until about the 25th May, when they rapidly dispersed to
their breeding-haunts, or continued their migration to the
north.

We did not again see any until we arrived at Gorodok.
There we found a nest containing newly hatched young, upon
the sandy scrub-covered tundra near the town. This was on
the 18th June. The Shore-Lark appears to be only very
locally distributed on the tundras which we visited. A sandy
tract of country to the north of Vassilkova, and the clay slopes
of the river-bank at Stanavoialachta and Dvoinik, were the
only localities where we saw them afterwards, and only at the
latter place in any numbers. Nowhere did we find them so
plentiful as we were led to expect we should by the immense
numbers which passed Ust Zylma in spring. We obtained
young able to fly on the 6th July.

120 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

ANTHUS SEEBOHMI, Dresser.

During our voyage down the great river we moored our
boat, on the evening of the 15th June, on the shore of an
island a little to the north of the arctic circle. The land was
flat and marshy, for the most part covered with willows, with
here and there a birch and an alder. Seebohm turned out at
three in the morning to shoot; and his attention was soon
arrested by the song of a bird with which he was unfamiliar.
The bird remained for nearly half an hour in the air, wheeling
round and round, like a Lark hovering, with expanded wings
and tail, whilst it was singing. ‘The first part of its song was
like the trill of a Temminck’s Stint, or like the concluding
notes of the Wood-Warbler’s song, so aptly described by
Gilbert White as its “shivering note.” This was succeeded
by a low guttural warble, such as the Bluethroat sometimes
makes, as if the bird were attempting to trill whilst inhaling
breath. After some time the bird alighted on a willow, and
continued its song there. It was afterwards heard to smg on
the ground, and was finally shot in a swamp, where it ap-
peared to be feeding, almost up to its belly water. An
hour afterwards Harvie Brown’s attention was called to
another bird of the same species, singing in like manner; and
after watching it for a short time, he succeeded in securing it.
Both birds proved to be males, and quite distinct from any
species with which either of us was acquainted. The hind
claw is long, like that of A. pratensis; and the general cha-
racter of the bird resembles a large and brilhantly plumaged
A. trivialis. Upon our return home five skins of this bird
were submitted to our friend Mr. Dresser, who, after com-
paring it with all the known Indian and other species of
this genus, pronounced it to be new. He will describe and
figure it in the next Part of his excellent work the ‘ Birds
of Europe.’ At Gorodok we spent the whole night of the
17-18th June shooting on the shore. The country here is a
sort of rolling prairie-land, some parts dry moor, with birch
or juniper and a few pines, and the lower land willow-swamps
and marshes. On the marshy ground we saw many Ruffs
and Red-necked Phalaropes, and found our new Pipit by no

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 121

means uncommon. Sometimes two or three were singing at
the same time. By dint of patient watching and waiting,
part of the time in a drizzling rain, we each secured another
specimen, both males. At Alexievka we frequently saw the
Petchora Pipit on the willow-swamp on the island, and ob-
tained several nests of this species between the 24th and 29th
June. The nest is somewhat similar to that of the Red-
throated Pipit; but instead of being composed of fine round
grass, it is generally made of flat-leaved grass and knotted
water-plants and small leaves; and in two of them we found
small Hguiseta. 'The eggs are like large varieties of those of
the Meadow-Pipit ; five seems to be the usualnumber. This
bird would appear to be a somewhat later breeder than A.
cervinus. All the eggs we obtained were fresh, whilst those
of the latter bird, taken at the same time, were too much
incubated to be worth the trouble of blowing. At Alexievka
we were not so fortunate in procuring birds; but just before
we sailed we succeeded in shooting three more specimens as
they were feeding on the sandy banks of the river. One of
these proved to be a female. ‘This bird is ultra aquatic in its
habits. We did not meet with it on the tundra at Stanavoia-
lachta or Dvomik.

ANTHUS TRIVIALIS (L.).

Only one specimen of the Tree-Pipit was obtained. It was
shot at Ust Zylma on the 22nd May. ‘This was the only one
we saw.

ANTHUS PRATENSIS (L.).

We got the Meadow-Pipit for the first time on the 12th
May. ‘This species is far less abundant than the next at Ust
Zylma at the time of migration; and afterwards we found
them quite a scarce and local bird on the tundra. They
frequented principally the opener parts of the alder and birch
thickets on the banks of the river Zylma, where they perched
freely upon alder and birch trees, and more rarely on wil-
lows, both flying up from the ground and from tree to tree.
We were surprised at this; but the habit seemed to be per-
fectly well known to Piottuch, who informed us of it before

122 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

we shot them in the act. They seldom alighted in the open
fields, and in this respect differed completely from the next
species.

The tundra at Stanavoialachta was the only locality where
we found them breeding; and there we procured two nests.
There also the birds, on two occasions, were seen to perch on
the low stunted willows.

ANTHUS CERVINUS, Pall.

The Red-throated Pipit is an extremely abundant species
during migration at Ust Zylma; and large straggling flocks
were constantly passing over for days together between the
17th May, when we first got specimens, and the 29th, when no
less than ten were secured out of one flock. These migratory
flocks did not rest much at Ust Zylma; but when they did
pitch to feed or rest, they preferred the marshy, hummocky,
open ground, like their native tundra, of which there were
one or two patches near the town. ‘They rested also in the
fields, perching on the heaps of manure ; but they were gene-
rally to be seen passing overhead against the wind at a con-
siderable elevation, the bright sun glancing on their breasts,
enabling us easily to identify them. Wesawno more at Ust
Zylma after the latter date, but found them again sparingly
on the islands of the upper delta between Viski and Gorodok.
Northwards they became abundant on the willow-covered
islands of the lower delta, and on the tundra around Vassil-
kova and up to Stanavoialachta, but were not found at Dvoinik
in such large numbers.

Both at the time of migration and at their breeding-haunts
we frequently saw them perching on low trees and bushes.

Many of their eggs and nests were brought to us by the
Zyriani, or found by our men and ourselves after our arrival ©
at Alexievka; but by that time (say June 26th) by far the
larger number of the former were deeply incubated. Young
able to fly were procured on the 20th July.

BupyTEs VIRIDIS, Scop. ?
This handsome species is abundant around Ust Zylma, but
becomes scarcer further north, and at last finally disappears,

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 123

giving place to the next species. We got it first at Ust Zyl-
ma on the 23rd May, and continued to shoot numbers of them
up to the time of our leaving that locality. But though plen-
tiful at Ust Zylma, northwards we found them much rarer,
only occurring here and there in pairs in the opens and
clearings near the villages as far as Abramoff, or to about 20
miles within the arctic circle. North of that locality we did
not again see it. The northern range of this species appears
to overlap the southern range of the next species during the
breeding-season, and vice versd. Along the banks of the
Petchora stray pairs, as already noted, occur to the north of
the arctic circle; and only stray pairs of the Yellow-headed
Wagtail occur to the south of the same degree of latitude.
A considerable belt of country lying along the arctic circle,
and for some distance north and south of it, may be looked
upon as a neutral territory of the two species, where neither
seems to have gained a firm footing. To the north of this
belt the Yellow-headed Wagtail becomes the commonest bird
of the delta; and to the south of the same belt the present
species is abundant.

Bupytes crtReouvs (Pall.).

We did not find the Yellow-headed Wagtail at all at Ust
Zylma; and only one small party, of five birds, was seen at
Habariki, on the 38rd June, when a single example was shot.
We again met with a pair on the Yorsa river, of which we
shot the male, and we found them sparingly here and there
in pairs, as already stated, frequenting the opener parts of the ~
woods, as far as Abramoff. After leaving Viski we found
them more numerously. At Kuya they were common, and
at Alexievka they were daily seen in abundance ; indeed this
species appeared to be quite the commonest bird on the islands.
It was present also, but not in such numbers, on the tundra.
At Stanavoialachta comparatively few were met with; and
none were seen at Dvoinik. The first eggs were brought to
us by the Zyriani at Alexievka on the 19th June, the day of
our arrival at that place; and we continued to get eggs ina
fresh state for some time. We procured the young able to
fly on the 20th July.

124 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

The Yellow-headed Wagtail’s favourite haunts are the opens:
in the willow-thickets; and in such localities they literally.
swarm and are excessively tame. They perch on the tops of
the bushes, often sitting in a peculiar bunched-up position,
fly round an intruder in circles, or hover overhead, much after
the manner of the other Wagtails or Pipits, and utter their
monotonous chirping note, which, when often repeated, runs
into a confused song. As many as a dozen were sometimes
in the air at one time, above and around us. They often
came from a distance towards us and followed us, accom-
panyving us off their premises, until relieved by a fresh relay.
Their general habits closely resemble those of the last species.
The nests are carefully concealed amongst the tangled grass
and wild flowers, which usually cover the dryer open spaces,
and are composed of fine grasses, lined with reindeer’s hair
and roots or fibres. One we examined, whether by accident
or design, contained two Pintail’s feathers and one spray of
Duck’s down. The nests are difficult to find, owing to the
males giving the females early warning of the approach of
danger, and the above-mentioned habit of flying overhead
and constantly uttering their alarm-notes and perseveringly
convoying the intruder as long as he is in the vicinity, in
which the females also take part. The thick nature of the
undergrowth makes it a difficult matter to watch the female
to the nest. At the distance of a few yards it would be almost
impossible. The eggs closely resemble the eggs of other
Wagtails of the Budytes group.

Concerning the migration of this species on the Kama
river and near Kasan, the editors of the “ Descriptive Cata-
logues of the High School of the Imperial University of
Kasan ” inform us that it arrives there when the other Wag-
tails have young, about the middle of April, and that a few
pairs are seen as late as the beginning of June (new style).
The migratory flocks in all probability pass on down the river
Petchora from the head-waters of the Kama as far as Ust
Ussa, then, leaving the banks of the river and crossing over
the intervening country, reach it again somewhere north of
Ust Zylma, the neighbourhood of which town they do not

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 125

appear to visit; at least, there we did not meet with a single
specimen up to the 10th of June, when we left on our fur-
ther journey down the river.

Moracitia asa, L.

The White Wagtail appeared for the first time on the 12th
May, was plentiful while the migration lasted, and was
perhaps most numerous about the 17th and 18th. We did
not, however, find it plentiful afterwards, only a few pairs
haunting each village or farm; but we traced it all the way
down the river as far as Alexievka. We got the first eggs on
the 15th June, at Abramoff. <A nest of this bird taken at
Alexievka is similar in appearance to those found in Norway
and at Archangel, but is lmed entirely with Reindeer’s hair
and two or three spider’s cocoons. We did not find the White
Wagtail north of Alexievka.

TurpDUS PILARIS, L.

The Fieldfare was first seen by us at Ust Zylma in flocks
on the 17th May; and we afterwards found it.common as far
north as Stanavoialachta, where we saw the young birds fre-
quenting the scrub which clothes a great part of the slope of
the river-bank. We did not see it at Dvomik. The first
eges were procured by us at Habariki on the 3rd June. It
appears to be a somewhat later breeder here than the Red-
wing.

Turpvs 1n1acvus, L.

The Redwing appeared at Ust Zylma on the same date as,
and flying in the same flocks with, the last species. We did
not meet with it north of Stanavoialachta, though probably
it is to be found, and also the Fieldfare, on the lower islands
of the delta, which we did not visit.

CyanecutLa suecica (L.).

The Swedish Nightingale is an extremely abundant species
in North Russia; and in early summer it enlivens by its admi-
rable mimicry every patch of underwood in the forests of pine
and juniper on the sides of the valleys near Ust Zylma. It is
abundant also in the birch- and willow-thickets and swamps

126 Letters, Announcements, &c.
\

along the river-banks, and on the islands all the way north
to Stanavoialachta. Even such dips and hollows of the tun-
dra as can boast a patch of willow-scrub hold a few pairs.
We got the first of the migrants of this species at Ust Zylma
on the 28rd May; and they soon became very plentiful in the
woods and valleys around Ust Zylma.

Often were we puzzled by the mimicry of this fine songster.
On one occasion, after listening for some time to the well-
known musical cry of the Terek Sandpiper, terr-r-r-whui,
blended with the songs of scores of other birds on approach-
ing we saw our little friend perched high in a willow-bush,
with throat distended, bill rapidly vibrating, and uttering the
tirr-r-r-whui with perfect distinctness. We have heard the
Blue-throated Warbler also imitate, amongst other bird-voices,
the trilling first notes of the Wood-Sandpiper, or the full rich
song of the Redwing. Sometimes he runs these together in|
such a way as to form a perfect medley of bird-music, defy-
ing one who is not watching to say whether or not the whole
bird-population of that part of the forest are ele en-
gaged in the concert at the same time.

[To be continued. |

XIII.—Letiers, Announcements, &c.

The following letters, addressed ‘To the Editor of ‘The
Ibis, ”? have been received :—

Sir,—I notice that Mr. Gurney, in his notes on Mr.
Sharpe’s Catalogue of the Accipitres, remarks on the omis-
sion of Circus eruginosus and C. melanoleucus from the Ceylon
list. I fancy that Mr. Sharpe includes Ceylon under the
head of ‘ India” in the habitat he gives for eastern Raptors,
as there are a number of similar omissions, such as Falco
communis, F. peregrinator, F. chicquera, F. severus, Cerchneis
tinnunculus, C. amurensis, Nisaétus fasciatus, Lophotriorchis
kieneri, Polioaétus ichthyaétus, Buteo desertorum, Neophron
ginginianus, which are all visitors or stragglers to this island.
With regard to C. eruginosus, | may say that it is our most
abundant Harrier, arriving at the end of October, and fre-

Letters, Announcements, &c. 127

quenting chiefly the west and south-west maritime regions.
I have shot it, however, in the south-east and in the north of
the island. Itismore numerous in some years than in others.
In 1872 I met with more birds than before or since that year ;
and I then got a fine series of young birds in all stages of the
immature luteous head-dress ; no two birds were alike. There
appears to be an intermediate stage (that of the second year)
between yearling birds, with the buff head and throat, yel-
lowish chest, point of wing, patch over the elbow, and dark
tail, and those handsome examples (evidently in the third year)
in which the buff striated plumage of the head extends down
on to the back and over the lesser wing-coverts, and in which
the chest and throat are tawny and buff, the lower parts as ru-
fous, almost, as in the adult, the primary wing-coverts washed
with grey, and the tail uniform chocolate-grey. I refer to the
plumage, in which the rich buff of the head extends down to
the back, but not so far as in the above in which the wing-
coverts are partially overcast with the same, the upper tail-
coverts edged ferruginous, the under wing-coverts light rufous,
the tail light rufous brown slightly washed with grey, and
showing light beneath, and the iris light brown. I would
remark that in the third stage the iris is yellow, as in the
adult, and so are the tarsi, showing that the soft parts, in
their march towards maturity, gain on the plumage.

Circus melanoleucus is very rare in Ceylon. I have only
seen one example during my seven years’ tour of collecting.
While on the subject of Raptors, I may mention that Messrs.
White and Co., taxidermists in Kandy, inform me that a
second example of L. kieneri has been procured in the hills.
I was fortunate to shoot a magnificent F. communis (2) on
the cliffs of this fort last month. A pair visit us every October ;
but their haunt is so inaccessible, that hitherto I have been
unable to get at them. The weight of this specimen equals,
I suppose, that of any ever shot in the east—2 Ib. 4 0z., and
carefully weighed! It is true, its crop and stomach were full ;
but I conclude this condition is taken into account in the
weights given by Hume and others. This was a comparatively
young bird, brownish feathers still remaining on the head

btn eer, 5

128 Letters, Announcements, &c.

and back, and a few chocolate-coloured immature signs on
the thigh-coverts and*under wing-coverts. The wing mea-
sured 14°5 inches; another Ceylon-killed specimen in my
collection has the wing the same length. i

I have just returned from: a tour through the “park”
country of the eastern province and the eastern slopes of the
mountain-zone. As regards the distribution of our species,
the latter district presents very remarkable features, owing to
the mountains being bare and rising up immediately from
the low country (which is, itself, intersected by innumerable
hills, based on a low level), without a barrier of forest as on
the western side; the consequence is, that low-country
birds range all through Madoolseema and Uva* to great al-
titudes, and some hill-birds range down into the low country.
Paleornis calthrope is abundant in the “ park” country at 400
feet elevation; Xantholema indica ranges up to 3000 or
4000 feet, Buchanga cerulescens the same, Picus mahrat-
tensis up to 8000, and so on. This Barbet and Drongo are
the species of the eastern province. But more of all this
anon. I am, dear Sir,

Faithfully yours,

Trincomalie, Ceylon. W. V. Leecs, Capt. R.A.

8th November, 1875.

P.S. There is a misprint in the last volume of ‘ The Ibis,’ '
p. 283, where the length of the wing of Chrysocolaptes fes-
tivus is given as 2°8 instead of 5:8.

Srir,—In a letter to me, dated Nov. 16th, 1875, Heligo-
land, Mr. Gatke observes :—“ This fall has been ‘awfully
bad,’ nothing but storms from all quarters, with cold down-
pours. The last autumn was had, but this one infinitely
worse: all I got is a fine specimen of Hmberiza rustica, an
E. pusilla, also a Muscicapa parva ; Woodcocks, Thrushes,
and Blackbirds scarcely any.”

Mr. Giatke also remarks that, on running up all notes about
Phylloscopus superciliosus, he finds some fifty have undoubt-
edly been seen, and of these about twenty captured, since Oc-

* Our two eastern coffee-districts,

Letiers, Announcements, &c. 129

tober 1846, besides about twenty reported as seen, but not

noted down, as somewhat doubtful.
I am, faithfully yours,

' Great Cotes, Ulceby. JOHN CorRDEAUX.
December 6th, 1875.

Siz,—Through the kindness of Mr. Edward Newton, I
have had an opportunity of examining an adult pair of Circus
maillardi, recently brought by that gentleman from the island
of Réunion, where, I understand from Mr. Newton, they
are rapidly becoming scarce in consequence of a reward
being given by the local authorities for their destruction.

In ‘The Ibis’ for 1875, I have given at page 229 some
particulars tending to show that the race of Circus mazllardi
inhabiting Réunion is somewhat smaller than that found in
Joanna Island.

Having only seen male birds from the latter locality, my
comparison has been limited to that sex; but the result is
- confirmed by the measurements of Mr. Newton’s Réunion
male, which I here give in juxtaposition with the other mea-
surements, previously published but here repeated for the
sake of comparison :—

Wing, from
carpal joint. Tarsus.
Adult males— in. in.
From Réunion, in the collection of Mr.
Sis V2) ee a ry 14-35 3:25
From Réunion, in the Leyden Museum,
as measured by Mr. Sharpe ........ 141 3°35
From Joanna Island, in the Norwich
Museum et hain? Jessie a2. 4 16:8 3°65
Also from Joanna Island, in the Nor-
RPE UBOUND i. «ote g's to ce wed ty oF 16°8 3°62

In the notice of the two males from Joanna Island, in
‘The Ibis’ for 1875, some particulars are given at page 230
of the coloration of the tail and upper tail-coverts, to which
I would refer, and at the same time would mention, for com-
parison, that in Mr. Newton’s Réunion male the rectrices are
grey, but have acquired a brownish tinge where exposed to
the action of the weather; one of the middle rectrices shows

SER. III.—VOL. VI. K

130. Letters, Announcements, &c.

a narrow longitudinal dark spot near the upper portion of the
shaft; and both show a broad terminal bar of blackish brown,
slight indications of which are also perceptible on some of the
other rectrices. Those feathers of the upper tail-coverts which
are nearest the tail are white ; but those nearest the rump are
black, with very narrow white tips, and also an irregular white
spot on the inner web of one of them. In other respects the
markings of this specimen appear to me to agree with those
of the Joanna-Island examples.

I may take this opportunity of mentioning that Mr. Edward
Newton feels quite certain as to the correctness of the dia-
gnosis by dissection which showed the type specimen of Circus
macroscelis to be a male (conf. Ibis, 1875, p. 231).

Whilst on the subject of Harriers I may remark that in
‘The Ibis’ for 1875, pp. 226-228, I published some notes
on the various plumages of Circus melanoleucus ; as an ad-
dition to these, I now give some particulars of a Har-
rier of that species, obtained in the month of March in
the Darrany district of Assam by Major H. H. Godwin-
Austen, and ascertained by that gentleman to. be a female ;
premising that an ordinary adult male was obtained by the
same ornithologist in the same month and in the same lo-
cality, and that I have been indebted to the good offices of
Lord Walden for the opportunity of examining both these
specimens. In this female the feathers on the entire upper
surface of the head are blackish brown, with narrow rufous
edgings; those of the nape are still darker, and without
rufous edgings; the entire mantle is of a similar tint, in-
creasing in intensity as it approaches the tips of the lower
scapulars, which are almost black. The general hue of the
mantle is apparently unbroken, except by narrow buff edgings
to the upper interscapulary feathers; but on lifting up the
lower scapulars, the feathers which they conceal are found to
be grey, barred with blackish brown, which is darkest towards
the tip, and in places mottled with white on the inner web ;
the feathers on the rump are blackish brown, more or less
tipped with white; the upper tail-coverts white, with one, or
at most two, irregular brown spots in each feather ; the tail

Letters, Announcements, &c. 13]

grey, with six irregular transverse bars and a whitish tip, but
with no tinge of rufous. The under surface is marked very
much as is represented in ‘The Ibis’ for 1874, Plate X., but
with considerably more white on the abdomen, owing to the
brown streaks being fewer and narrower; the thighs and
under tail-coverts are also white, with a few streaks of brown,
varying in both length and breadth. The wings in this spe-
cimen show a remarkable approach to the plumage of the
adult male: the whole of the lesser wing-coverts are white,
but with a broad sagittate mark of dark brown in the centre
of each feather, the same coloration being extended over the
bend of the carpal joint, and along the anterior edge of the
wing to the commencement of the greater coverts; the black
band which, in the adult male, extends from the neighbour-
hood of the carpal joint to the tips of the tertials, is, in this
specimen, represented by a corresponding band of dark cho-
colate-brown, varied by some of the brown feathers passing,
in part, into a decided black, and by a few white spots in
that part of the band which is near to the carpal joint ;
that portion of the wing which is grey in the full-plumaged
male is also grey in this female, but with transverse bars of
dark brown as in the ordinary plumage of male specimens of
intermediate age.
The principal measurements of this female are as follows—
wing from carpal joint 15:8, tarsus 3°3, middle toe s. u. 1°45.
E I am, &c.,

Northrepps, Norwich. J. H. Gurney.
3rd December, 1875.

Srr,—In the October number of ‘The Ibis’ for 1875, Dr.
N. Severtzoff, in a paper upon some new Central-Asian birds,
gives descriptions of three Pheasants, which he calls respec-
tively Phasianus semitorquatus, Phasianus chrysomelas, and
Phasianus persicus.

Of the first of these Dr. Severtzoff seems to be undecided
about the specific distinctness from P. mongolicus. Without
having seen the specimen, I am of course unable to give any
decided opinion ; but it is not improbable that it may be only a

182 Letters, Announcements, &c.

dark form of P. mongolicus. Of the next species, by the kind-
ness of yourself and Mr. Dresser, I have had an opportunity
of seeing the specimens brought to England by Dr. Severt-
zoff, and am satisfied it is the same as the one I named P.
insignis in my monograph. I had but an imperfect skin to
describe from, without any head or neck, and I erred in sup-
posing that the adult would not have any white ring. The
specimen belonging to Mr. Dresser, a male, not having its
adult plumage, has, indeed, no ring; but the adult seems to
have an imperfect one, not nearly so well defined as that in
P. mongolicus. The third species of Dr. Severtzoff, P. per-
sicus, I have not seen; but, from the déscription, I esteem
it to be the P. shawi of my monograph, which, though similar
in plumage to P. colchicus, has the white wings of P. mon-
golicus and P. insignis.
I am yours, &e.,
London, 14th December, 1875. D. G. Exuior.

S1r,—I find, on looking over my “ List of Birds collected
or observed during a journey into the Matabili country in
1873,” that a few corrections and additions are required.

First, the information under “ Gyps kolbii” (Ibis, 1874,
p- 358) refers to “ Lophogyps occipitalis.”’

Second, that under “ Gyps rueppelli ” refers to “ Gyps
kolbii.”’

POLIOHIERAX SEMITORQUATUS.

Seen on two or three occasions in the Bamangwato district.

BusBo MACULOSUS.

I flushed one of these Owls off her nest in the rocks among
the high hills that le to the back of Strasbourg, the chief town
of the Bamangwato. The nest was merely a hole scooped
out in the bank and sheltered by a rock; in this were lying
two eggs, with no lining whatever; the bird sat until I almost
trod on her.

E.RYTHROPUS VESPERTINUS ?

One day in November I saw an enormous quantity of Hob-
bies, apparently this species, at a place called Holtfontein, in
the west of the Transvaal.

Letters, Announcements, &c. 133

CERYLE MAXIMA.

Seen on one or two occasions on the Limpopo, but appa-
rently not very common there.

IRRISOR ERYTHRORHYNCHUS.

Common in the Bamangwato district, going about in parties
of from six to eight; they are noisy and restless.

LANIARIUS ATROCOCCINEUS.

I took a nest of this species out of a small thorn-tree on
the 7th of November : it was placed in a fork of the tree, very
small indeed for the size of the bird, and was made entirely
of soft dead reeds, no other lining ; it contained three eggs,
white ground, very much spotted with light brown. The bird
was extremely tame, coming down to the nest, though I was
not more than a foot directly underneath it.

M£EGALOPHONUS APIATUS.

One specimen, obtained on the “High Veldt,’ in the
Transvaal.

EuPoporis KORI.

This splendid Bustard I only saw on one or two occasions
in the bush country, and always singly.

RALLUS CHRULESCENS.

I obtained one specimen close to Pietermaritzburg ; but it
was too much injured for preserving.

I am, dear Sir, yours truly,
T. E. Buckuey.

Sir,—In a recent article on the birds of the Pelew Islands
(Journ. Mus. Godeffroy, pt. viii. p. 18), Dr. O. Finsch leaves
it to be inferred that the Philippines are inhabited by two
distinct species of the genus Artamus. One species (which
he identifies as being the true Lanius leucorhynchus, L.), Dr.
Finsch states, is restricted to the Philippine and Pelew groups
of islands. The second, according to the same author, is
Artamus leucogaster, Valenc., and is said by Dr. Finsch to be
common to both the Philippine and the Sunda Islands. The
closely allied New-Caledonian species of the genus, A. mela-
leucus (Forst.), Dr. Finsch considers specifically distinct from
the Pelew form.

134 Letters, Announcements, &c.

In a former paper on the birds of the Pelew Islands (P. Z.S.
1868, pp. 116, 117), Drs. Hartlaub and Finsch had already
asserted in positive terms that the Philippines were inhabited
by two distinct species of Artamus. On this assertion I
ventured some remarks in my memoir on the birds of the
Philippine archipelago (Tr. Z. 8S. ix. p. 174). But as Dr.
Finsch, in his more recent paper (/.c.), still identifies the
Pelew form with A. leucorhynchus of the Philippines, while
treating the Pelew bird as a species distinct from the Artamus
of the Sunda Islands, it becomes necessary to review the
grounds on which this identification rests. It is not pri-
marily a question of correct title that has to be decided, but
one of fact. Is there any trustworthy evidence of the Philip-
pines possessing two species of Artamus, the one identical
with the species found in the Sunda Islands, the other with
that confined to the Pelew Islands? As to there being two
_ Philippine species, it is true that, while Brisson described and
figured (Ornithologia, 11. p. 180, t. xviii. f. 2) a species of the
genus from a specimen obtained in the vicinity of Manilla,
preserved in Aubrey’s cabinet, Sonnerat again separately de-
scribed and figured a species observed by him in the Philippines
(Voy. N. Guin. p. 55, t. 25). Sonnerat mentions that his
species was the one described by Buffon (Hist. Nat. 1. p. 310)
under the title of Pie-griéche des Philippines. Sonnerat’s erro-
neous quotation of the title used by Buffon need not now have
been alluded to, were it not that Buffon really employed as the
title part of the native name given by Brisson, and called it
le Langraien, and nowhere does Buffon use the title attri-
buted by Sonnerat. Buffon’s account (for it cannot be called
a description) is taken from Brisson ; and he quotes the volume
and page of the ‘Ornithologia.’ As Sonnerat identified his
species with that of Buffon, and as Buffon manifestly refers
to Brisson’s species, we may assume that the same species was
understood by all three authors. Gmelin (S. N. 1. p. 305),
by adopting the Linnean title. for Brisson’s species, with
which he associated that of Buffon, and by bestowing (E. c.
p- 307) a separate title on Sonnerat’s bird, was the first author
who suggested the idea of the Philippines (or rather the vici-
nity of Manilla) being inhabited by two distinct species of

Letters, Announcements, &c. 135

Artamus. If we turn to the two original descriptions, we
certainly find a discrepancy. For the dark-coloured part of
his species Brisson uses the word blackish (nigricante),
whereas Sonnerat describes those portions of the plumage as
being black (oz). Gmelin (J. c.) correctly adopts these di-
stinctions in his description of L. leucorhynchus and of L. do-

minicanus. If we refer to the plates, the shading of Brisson’s
- figure may be said to be consistent with his description ;
Sonnerat’s plate represents the dark plumage as being inky
black. The bird depicted by D’Aubenton (PI. Enl. 9. f. 1)
also has the dark parts of the plumage coloured jet-black.
A comparison of dates renders it impossible that D’ Aubenton
could have figured from Sonnerat’s specimen; and the pre-
sumption is strongly in favour of his having had Brisson’s
type before him; and the title affixed by him, Pie-griéche de
Manille, is the one first employed by Brisson. Buffon cites
the plate as representing his Langraien ; and, as already stated,
Sonnerat relates that his Philippine example belonged to the
species mentioned by Buffon.

If these discrepancies had been relied on by the older
authors (not Gmelin, for he was merely an indiscriminating
compiler) as differentiating two Luzon species of Artamus,
I would hesitate before asserting that they had described from
examples of the same species. But Dr. Finsch in no way
relies on these discrepancies. Dr. Finsch takes his stand on
Lanius manillensis, Briss. (=. leucorhynchus, L.), described.
as being blackish, and unites the jet-black bird of Sonnerat,
L. philippensis, Scop. (=L. dominicanus, Gm.), with it, and
refers the Pelew bird to them. If there are two species of
Artamus in the Philippines, one very dark-coloured, the Pelew
bird, the other lighter-coloured, the species of the Sunda
Islands, the first must be Sonnerat’s (L. dominicanus, Gm.),
the other Brisson’s (L. leucorhynchus, L.). But Dr. Finsch
also unites with the Pelew bird Ocypterus leucorhynchus,
Temm., apud Kittlitz, “von den Sunda-Inseln,’ although
Kittlitz states (Kupfert. p. 29) he saw the same (that is, the
Sunda-Islands bird)in Luzon. The figure given by Kittlitz (op.
cit. t. xxx. f. 1) certainly represents the light-coloured known
Philippine species—that is, the Artamus of the Sunda Islands,

136 Letters, Announcements, &c.

The Pelew bird is also referred by Dr. Finsch to the Ocypterus
leucorhynchus, Cuv., of Hahn (Vog. aus As., Afr. &c. pt. xix.
t. 2); and the plate is characterized as excellent. Hahn’s
figure represents all the dark plumage jet-black; but he de-
scribes the head, neck, wings, and tail as being slate-grey,
aud the back only as sooty black. Although styled a “ figura
optima” by Dr. Finsch, the upper tail-coverts in Hahn’s
plate are coloured black instead of white. Hahn gives the
East Indies, especially Java, as the range of the species he
describes and figures.

Now, putting aside the fact that there is no known species
of Artamus whose dark shade of colouring is nearly so in-
tensely black as that depicted by D’Aubenton, by Sonnerat,
and by Hahn, not even the Pelew species, there is the still
more convincing fact that there is no record of any author
having ever seen authenticated Philippine examples of two
species of Artamus. Dr. Finsch (in epist.), kindly replying
to my queries on this point, informs me that he has never
seen authenticated Philippine examples of more than one
species; and they belonged to the Sunda-Islands form, A.
leucogaster, Valenc. If, then, examples of a second Philip-
pine species are unknown, and if, as is admitted by Dr.
Finsch, the species which is known to inhabit the Philip-
pines, and especially Luzon, is- identical with that of the
Sunda Islands, this last must take the Linnean title of
the Philippine bird. In this view the synonymy of the species
as set forth by me in my memoir on the birds of Celebes (Tr.
Z.S. viii. p. 67) will, I think, be found correct. My excuse
for writing to you now so fully on the subject is not only be-
cause so distinguished an ornithologist as Dr. Finsch has dif-
fered from this interpretation of the facts, but because another
most accurate naturalist, Count Salvadori, after accepting
my views in his meritorious work on the birds of Borneo, has
since adopted, in his notes on some Celebean birds (Ann. Mus.
Civ. St. Nat. Genova, vil. p. 16), those of Dr. Finsch. If the
Pelew species of Artamus specifically differs from A. mela-
leucus (Forst.), it would appear to require a distinctive title.

I remain, yours, &c.,
Chislehurst, December 1875. WALDEN.

THE IBIS.

THIRD SERIES.

No. XXII. APRIL 1876.

XIV.—Notes on some little-known Birds of the new Colony of
the Fyi Islands. By Epear L. Layarp, C.M.G., F.Z.S.,
Administrator of the Government.

THE arrival of the Governor, the Hon. Sir Arthur Gordon,
to assume the direction of the affairs of this infant colony,
and the necessity of some relaxation from the strain and
worry of the previous eighteen months, which had seriously af-
fected my health, afforded me reasons for seizing an oppor-
tunity to visit the beautiful and fertile island of Taviuni, the
third largest of the Fiji archipelago, and one from which
some of our most interesting birds have been procured.

As Mr, Liardet had brought from Taviuni to Levuka some
indifferent specimens, which he submitted to my mspection,
and amongst which I instantly detected several new species,
I despatched-my son, Mr. Leopold Layard, in April last to
procure better skins. This he accomplished as regards all
those species hitherto obtained, save one; and he also
brought a report which determined me to go thither myself
and see this island and its treasures with my own eyes.

On the 14th of July I started for Ngila, the hospitable
residence of James Mason, Esq., which became my fixed abode

SER. I1I.—VOL. VE. L

Ss,

=i “S27; Foe pe x
Bis paeee ——
= vs. Ss r

ie >

138 Mr. E. L. Layard on some little-known

for six weeks; and in the woods at the back of his plantation
the accompanying observations were made. My son at the
time was up the Rewa river, among the “ Kai-tholos,” or
mountaineers, in the centre of Viti Levu, on a collecting
expedition; but on receiving my summons, despatched by a
special messenger, he hurried down and joined me at N¢gila;
and we worked together.

The climate was delightful, the temperature being often
as low as 62° Fahr. at night and in the morning, and ordi-
narily about 76° or 78° by day. A blanket and counterpane
were usually acceptable ; and we had no mosquitoes.

The forest about here rises from the back of the plantation
in a gradual slope to an altitude of 800 or 1000 feet above
the level of the sea. The lower portion has evidently at some
time been felled and cultivated, but is now covered with a
second growth of timber. This, though of fair size, contamed
little to interest us—an occasional Rhipidura or Monarcha,
and now and then a stray “Orange Dove,” in the young or
green plumage. As we ascended the range the timber be-
came finer, and resounded with the call of my new Pachyce-
phala torquata, the new Myiolestes macrorhynchus put in an
appearance, young ‘‘ Orange Doves” became more plentiful ;
and on the flowering trees Ptilotis carunculata and the lovely
little Parrot which I have named Trichoglossus aureicinctus
hung pendent from the branches of the white blossoms, and
chased each other with shrill screams or loud flute-like pipings.
Then we gained the highest summits; and from among the
lofty trees that clothed them came the loud booming “ bark ”
of the large fruit-eating “ Barking Pigeon” (Carpophaga

_latrans) and the harsh screams of the red-and-green Parrot.

As we hunted about, an odd chuckling sound, like a coach-
man starting his horses, was heard ; and “ Pretty” (the Laconi
boy), knowing what we wanted, excitedly whispered ‘“ Manu-
manu dum-dum,” which is, being interpreted, “ the red bird.”

We dived into the “bush” after the boy, who peered up
into the green leaves; suddenly he stopped, beckoned exci-
tedly, whispering “ Manu-manu dum-dum, Manu-manu, dum-
dum” in a rapid voice, and pointed upwards. We gazed in

Birds of the Fiji Islands. 139

vain, till what we had taken for the gorgeous tints of a dying
leaf, suddenly sprang to another bough. ‘The “ coachman ”
tried to start his horses again; and at every “chuck ” the
“ gorgeous erange ” jerked up and down in the oddest manner.
It was Chrysena victor of Gould, in all his glory! which
in a few moments fell like an orange-and-gold ball headlong
to the ground.

Brethren of the B. O. U. (I know you can rejoice with me
over the acquisition of a rare bird of beautiful colours and
strange appearance), picture to yourselves our delight as we
handled the brilliant Orangebird, with the sun-light gleaming
through its golden wings, and lighting up the emerald-green
of its bill and feet, and of the cere round the yellow-buff eye,
now closing, alas! in death.

We “lifted [him] up tenderly,” stroked the smooth fea-
thers of the strangely-coloured head, and recalled the moment
when Mr. Gould exhibited the first specimen in the rooms of
the Zoological Society. How little did I dream that I should
be the first, perhaps the only one, of those present who gazed
on the beautiful bird, to shoot it in its native haunts. We
think of friends far away, till ‘‘ Pretty” recalls us to Taviuni
and the woods with a tug at the sleeve, and the magic word
“ Manu-manu ;” and there, within easy range, with drooping
wings and uplifted tail, swinging in the loop of a pendent
liana, a jet-black bird, that at once reminded us of the Indian
Robin (Thamnobia fulicata), jerked itself from side to side,
while it progressed by short leaps up the hana. As I thrust —
a cartridge into the breech of my gun, the bird darted off
through the trees, exposing to my astonished gaze the ex-
quisite white satin patch that adorns the tail of Lamprola
victorie ! ;

Before my trip was over, many a sable beauty lay in my
hand; and probably my first acquaintance was one of them,
as we found them, though distributed, pretty local, and at-
tached to certain spots. My son and I usually brought home
a row of birds, numbering from sixteen to twenty or more,
pendent from a long stick, carefully carried by “ Pretty,’’ and
shaded from the sun or rain by a long banana-leaf. After an

140 Mr. E. L. Layard on some little-known

early dinner we then set to work, took out all the bodies of the
birds we had shot, and stowed the skins in close-fitting tin
boxes, with damp rags at the bottom. This kept them pliable ;
and a few drops of carbolic acid helped to retain them sweet.
A few were usually finished off that day, and the remainder on
the morrow; so we had alternate days fag in the forest and
rest after. At night we refilled cartridges and wrote labels.
This plan of working we found very advantageous ; and J give
it for the benefit of some of the young readers of ‘The Ibis.’

Having described our country, I now proceed to’ particu-
larize our birds; and the first I shot on entering the forest
shall have precedence.

ZOSTEROPS EXPLORATOR, Layard, P. Z. 8. 1875, p. 29.

I formerly described this species from memory, from a spe-
cimen obtained by the ‘Challenger’ exploring expedition,
and was very glad to meet with it again, and thus be enabled
to describe it more in detail.

Male. Upper surface of back, head, rump, and sides of chest
greenish yellow; forehead, and line reaching to the eye, chin,
throat, chest, and under tail-coverts yellow; belly whitish,
tinged with yellow; flanks pale brown; circle of feathers
round the eyelid well developed and white; under the eye a
small black patch ; wing- and tail-feathers pale black, edged
externally with yellow; inside of wing white ; shoulder tinted
with yellow ; bill livid dark blue, tip black, base of lower
mandible white; legs and feet blue; iris brown. Length
4! wing 2" 6!, tail 1" 6!"", tarsi 8’, bill 8".

The female resembles the male, but is slightly less brightly
coloured.

This species differs considerably from our other Zosterops
(Z. flaviceps, Peale) in having none of the blue (ashy) tints
so very noticeable in that species. It approaches apparently
most closely to Z. flavifrons, Gmel., from which it differs in
the brown flanks and the centre of the belly being white. |

It ranges in the forest in small parties of ten or more indi-
viduals, and, I am informed by the planters, often visits their
cotton-fields, to devour the minute insects that infest the

Birds of the Fiji Islands. 141

cotton-buds. It utters a shrill note, and is a restless, active,
prying little bird, ever on the move, examining flowers, leaves,
and branches, and everywhere gleaning an abundant harvest.

TricHoGLissus auRrEicinctus, Layard, Ann. & Mag. N. H.
1875, xvi. p. 844.

In April last my son reported the existence of a small Par-
rot, in. size about that of the Shell Parrakeet of Australia,
green, with a red neck and throat, flying in considerable
numbers in company (but not mingling) with the “Kulu”
(Lorius solitarius, Lath.). As he did not find the tree on which
they were then feeding, he did not succeed in securing a spe-
cimen. In June or July subsequently, two gentlemen and
my late servant Pearce, collecting in Viti Levu, obtained it.

Our bird is known to the natives of Fiji under the name
of “ Kula-wai,” and to the Laconi boys by that of “ Vuni-as.”

It frequents a tree’in the forests of Taviuni bearing a
white flower with filamentous pistils, not unlike that of the
“ Jambo ” of India (Hugenia gambos). It was often seen in
parties of six or eight, and never less than a pair together,
creeping about the branches and bunches of flowers with great
rapidity, hanging head downwards, or in any position so that
it could bite away portions of the flower to get at its favourite
morsel, or chasing the noisy Ptilotis carunculata that at-
tempted to share with it the flowery sweets.

The female differs very slightly, if at all, from the male;
but the young birds, instead of wearing the gorgeous red
breeches of the adults, have dull purple thighs, and the deep
pink of the throat and other tints are less vivid.

PLATYCERCUS TAVIUNENSIS, Sp. NOV.
On officially visiting Taviuni in the early part of 1874, a

Parrot’ was obtained alive by some of the men of H.M.S.

«
aur

‘Pearl,’ which I at once saw presented some marked differences
from the birds I had previously seen from Viti Levu. I
therefore directed my son to procure, if possible, specimens
for comparison. Unfortunately, the wet weather which pre-
vailed during his April trip prevented his obtaining more
than a single female. This bird, however, convinced me

142 Mr. E. L. Layard on some little-known

that the Taviuni race, if not specifically distinct, possessed
some marked characters; and I made the accompanying me-
morandum respecting it, determining to lose no opportunity
of seeing more of the species :—

“There is a marked difference between the red-breasted
Parrots found in Taviuni and on the islands of the western
portion of the group. The Taviuni bird is considerably smaller,
to begin with.”

A male shot by my son measures, length 14”, wing 7" 6”, tail
7" 8" (not fully grown ?), tarsi 10’, centre toe (without nail)
1"1'", bill 1”; a male shot on the Rewa measures, length
16" 6", tail 9” 6” (not fully grown), wing 9" 6!, tarsi 11”,
centre toe (without nail) 1” 3", bill 1” 22"; form less robust ;
the whole coloration is darker, but especially the crimson,
which, in the Taviuni bird, is turned into a deep maroon,
much the darkest on the forehead and lores. The Taviuni
bird also wants the blue patch at the back of the neck.

Just before my departure from Taviuni, a kind friend (Mr.
Tempest, of Ndreketti), who had been collecting for me in
Vanua Levu, brought me a small lot of birds, among which
were a splendid pair of Parrots. To my astonishment the
coloration was that of the Taviuni bird, but with the addition
of a blue nuchal collar, but not so well defined as in the Viti-
Levu birds, but still marked enough, and possessed by both
sexes. In size it resembles the Viti-Levu bird, the male
being a noble specimen, 17” long.

This made me more anxious than ever for a fine series of
Taviuni birds; and we consequently killed a lot of them, old
and young of both sexes; but not one exhibited the least trace
of the blue nuchal collar, while all were of the same deep cho-
colate-crimson, or maroon ; moreover they all, especially
the young, showed traces of dark green on the breast, body,
and legs, chiefly on the latter, where in some specimens it is
much developed, giving the thighs a scaly appearance. This
green occupies the entire base of each feather. In some spe-
cimens the rump appears scaly with the deep maroon; this
is never seen in the Viti-Levu race. Both sexes are smaller
than the Viti-Levu race. But a fresh surprise awaited us.
On our way down from Taviuni we anchored some hours at

pale:

Birds of the Fiji Islands. 143

Koro, an island midway between Ovalau and Taviuni, and,
rambling on shore, we came across some Parrots.

We shot three birds; and on examining them our aston-
ishment was not a little increased to find that two of them
exhibited the faintest trace of the blue nuchal collar! while
all have a large red broken maroon bar acrossthe rump. Here,
then, we have four distinct races in these islands (and, as I shall
presently show, this is not a solitary instance) :—first, the bright
crimson-bellied race, with blue collar, of Viti Levu, extending,
I think, to Kandavu*; second, the Mathuata bird (Bua and
Ndreketti), on the other large island of Vanua Levu, ma-
roon-bellied, with broadish blue nuchal collar}; third, the
Koro bird, maroon-bellied, with the faintest trace of the blue
collar{; and, fourth, the Taviuni race (P. taviunensis, mihi),
maroon-coloured, and without a trace of the blue collar.

In habits the races are similar. They frequent the forest,
feeding on various fruits and berries as they come into season,
and making descents on the planters’ Indian-corn crops, where
their depredations are very serious. They are very shy and
wary, planting sentinels, who, with harsh cries, warn the flock
of approaching danger, when off they all troop to the forest,
and hide silently in the dense crowns of the broadest-leafed
trees. Ifthey find themselves discovered, they utter loud cries,
swaying themselves to and fro on their perches, and holding
themselves ready for flightina moment. Ihave dodged them
by appearing to walk past, and then, after changing my No.
10 cartridge for No. 7, crept back and dropped my quarry, who
had meanwhile resumed his feeding, thinking that all was
secure. }

A gentleman at Ngila assured me that he had obtained
three young ones from the same nest. They are capable of
being tamed to any extent; anda lady on the Rewa has several

pairs of these and P. personatus that fly about the woods

* [This is P. splendens (Peale), Examples from both islands are in
Lord Walden’s collection.—ED. |

+ [This is probably P. tabuensis; but Mr. Layard’s speciments have not
yet reached this country.—Ep. |

{ [This appears to be P. hysyinus (Forster); but Mr. Layard’s specimens
have not yet arrived.—Ep. | .

144 Mr. E. L. Layard on some little-known

unrestrained, returning to roost at night in their cages.
When she walks out they fly to her and perch on her head
or shoulder; and the last sight I had of my fair friend was to
see her standing, on the high banks overlooking the river
where her house is situated, with a pair of P. personatus on
one shoulder, and a pair of P. splendens on the other.

ASTUR CRUENTUS, Gould.

We saw this Hawk breeding freely in the forest. It gene-
rally selects a banyan-tree (Ficus), and places its nest, a
rough structure of sticks, on a branch so thin as not to be
able to bear the weight of aman. We had to spoon the eggs
out, by tying a bag, kept open by a wire ring, to the end
of a long stick.

STRIX DELICATULA, Gould.

We took five eggs of the Australian White Owl from
a banyan-tree. They were laid in a depression (without any

nest) at the junction of four large branches. They are pure
white. Axis 1" 9!", diam. 1" 3!"

EUpDYNAMIS TAITIENSIS (Sparrm.).
A specimen of this bird, here very scarce, was shot a few
months ago near Levuka,

Cucu.us simus, Peale.
Seems to be a constant resident in the group; I have it
from Taviuni, Mathuata, the Rewa, &c.

Laxace TERAT (Bodd.),

I cannot help thinking that our Lalage is wrongly identified
with Lalage terat (Bodd.) ; but which of the numerous syn-
onyms quoted by Drs. Finsch and Hartlaub will apply to it,
I have no means of judging. I have received or shot speci-
mens from all parts of the group, but not one in any plumage
save that which is said to be the young stage. ‘This it wears
all the year round; and the natives everywhere declare that it
breeds in this state; but I have never yet sticceeded in ob-
taining a nest. . .

MonarcHA LEssoni, Hombr.

This species was common in the forest at all altitudes. A
nest, said to be of this bird, was brought to me (23rd July,

Birds of the Fiji Islands. 145

1875), composed entirely of rootlets, and thickly covered with
the yellow egg-bags of a common large spider. Diam. out-
side 2” 8!, inside 1! 9; depth outside 3" 6", inside 1" 9!",
It contained two eggs, hard-set; ground-colour white, spec-
kled, in the shape of aring at the obtuse end, with small pink
spots. Axis 10", diam. 7”.

MYIOLESTES MACRORHYNCHUS, Sp. nov.

This species, originally named by me from a specimen
brought in a miserable condition by Mr. Liardet from Ta-
viuni, replaces M. vitiensis, Hartl., in that island. It is not
uncommon in the forest, roaming about in search of the in-
sects on which it feeds. I never saw it on the ground; but
I once shot it climbing up the trunk of a tree, and clinging
to the bark, pecking like a Woodpecker at a decaying rotten
limb. It is a thorough mocking-bird. The sexes do not
differ. The edges of the basal portion of the upper, and on
the major part of lower mandible, are yellow, as is the inside
of the bill and throat. This species affords another instance
of variation as in Platycercus.

The Ovalau bird, Myiolestes vitiensis, Hartl., is much smaller
and lighter-coloured, and has always the tip of the tail almost
white; but I have a specimen from Bua, in Vanua Levu,
which seews intermediate. It is smaller than my M. macro-
rhynchus, paler, and with a well developed red-brown tip to
its tail. But I have a still more interesting bird from For-
tuna Island, outside this group, 350 miles to the N.E. It is
smaller than the Bua bird, and more like M. vitiensis ; but the
throat, chin, and breast are grey; the tails, though damaged,
are evidently broadly tipped with white. I propose to sepa-
rate the varieties, or species, as follows :—WM. vitiensis, Hartl.
(the type species) ; M. buensis, sp.nov.; M. macrorhynchus and
M. fortune, sp. nov. Unfortunately I have not a specimen
of M. vitiensis at hand; but I add the measurements as given
in the ‘Ornithologie der Viti-, Samoa- and Tonga-Inseln ’ of
Drs. Finsch and Hartlaub, wherein it is badly figured, the
white of the tail-tip and the red of the vent bemg too
prononcé. The measurements of the four species are as

follows :—

My. E. L. Layard on some little-known

Long.. Al. Caud. Tars. Rost.

in. lin. in. lin. in, lin. lin. lin.
M, vitrensis ...... 6 6 we 2 8 82 13
M. buensts ...... 6 6 3.8 3.4 11 18
M., fortune .. 0... 6 6 pho | 3.3 11 9
M. macrorhynchus 7 6 3.4 3.9 18 14

As will be seen, the bills of M. buensis and M. macro-
rhynchus much exceed the others in length, and are nearly
twice as thick.

PACHYCEPHALA TORQUATA, Sp. NOV.

This, another new species, is not uncommon in the forests
of Taviuni—perhaps on account of its loud and varied voice
betraying it oftener than that of other birds. If you listen
attentively, you will probably hear a kind of running bass
accompaniment of “ purr purr.” This comes from its mate,
a little brown bird. The family are like the female, the very
young ones being redder. As the young males grow up, the
glorious yellow livery in which the adult rejoices is put on
in patches, generally beginning with a yellow moustache on
each side of the mouth.

And now for a further inquiry into species or varieties.
What are the four birds we have here ?—1. Pachycephala
graffi, Hartl.; 2. P. vitiensis, Gray; 3. P. icteroides, Peale ;
4. P. torquata, Layard. Are they species or varieties ?

As far as I know, my P. torquata is confined exclusively
to Taviuni. ‘The yellow of the underparts is extremely rich,
and crossed by a broad black collar; the voice differs from
all the others. P. vitiensis is much paler, and the throat paler
still (Finsch and Hartlaub say “ white ;” but I have not seen
it so), and separated from the other yellow by a narrow black
collar.. It is found in Viti Levu, not elsewhere that I know of
yet. P.zcteroides has no collar, and is paler than either of
the two last. I fancy some specimens look as if they were
assuming collars, a few black spots appearing on the neck.
It is found in Ovalau. P. graffiti has a yellow spot on each
side of the forehead, beginning at the nostrils, and a yellow
bar on the rump. Its underparts equal those of P. torquata
in richness. It is found at Bua (Vanua Levu).

:
y
:

bn Be Wi et

ee,

Birds of the Fiji Islands. 147

My son said he saw a Pachycephala on the Rewa which was
much lighter than P. torquata; probably it was P. icteroides,
as he did not see any collar. He was so close to it that he
refrained from firing, lest he should blow it to pieces. A
native brought him a wonderful egg and nest; and on ques-
tioning him as to the parentage, he took him into the garden,
and, pointing to a bright yellow flower, said the body was like
that. We have no other bird of this colour; so I shall de-
scribe these eggs provisionally as those of this species.

The nest is a loose structure of rootless fine twigs, stems of
a fern, dried ferns, and leaves; about 6 inches across by 4
deep; diameter of cup about 3 inches.

The egg is of a coffee-colour, lightest at the small end,
darkest at the obtuse end, near which is a broad band of black.
Axis 14!" diam. 9!".. Surface polished.

APLONIS TABUENSIS, Gmel.

We did not find this species at Ngila, but in the forest at
the back of “Na Mala,’ a second plantation belonging to
Mr. Mason, some ten or eleven miles further south. It was
feeding in flocks in a forest-tree bearing large black berries
in clusters. It is not uncommon near Levuka; and I intro-
duce its name here chiefly to notice another instance of
variation.

I have two birds from the island of Fortuna, similar in
every measurement to the Fiji species, except that the bill is
stouter every way, but not longer; and the whole bird is im-
bued with a black shade. The sheen of the Fijian A. tabu-
ensis is coppery, especially about the head ; that of the other
is of iron. I propose to call it APLONIS FORTUNA, sp. Nov.

Pritotis PRocERIOR, F. & H.,
is unknown in Taviuni; and its place is supplied by a species
that I at first took for P. carunculata, Gmel. But the more I
look at it, the more I doubt its identity with that bird; with-
out actual comparison, however, with specimens from Tonga,
which is, I believe, the real habitat of P. carunculata, I can-
not quite decide the point. Measurements go for little in
this species, hardly two individuals agreeing together ; but not

5 ~e
. Pt 7
Oe t

148 Mr. E. L. Layard on some little-known

a single specimen we procured has the bill as short as 8",
the maximum quoted by Drs. Finsch and Hartlaub. Then,
again, they describe the iris as “ white,’ and so figure it;
in ours they are all buff, a darker shade prevailing. The
wattle is very different from that of P. procerior, but hardly
resembles that figured by Drs. Finsch and Hartlaub. If
found distinct on actual comparison, I would name it P. s?-
milis. I would call it after the island, of the birds of which
I now write; but I possess some specimens from Bua and
Mathuata islands which are identical.

I shall have more to say on the identity of some of the
birds of this coast with Taviuni presently ; meanwhile I must
refer to a species of Péilotis from Fortuna Island, which is
clearly quite distinct; but beimg one of Mr. Liardet’s bad
skins, is hard to describe.

It does not seem to have a pendent wattle, but a thickened,
bare, fleshy, elongated yellow spot, between which and the
bill is a black patch of feathers, and behind it, over the ears,
a spot of bright yellow feathers. Its whole coloration 1s
lighter than P. procerior and P. similis, especially on the chest
and belly, which are rather brightly tinged with yellow ; and it
has nowhere that ‘‘scaled” appearance which, I find, in certain
lights 1s exhibited by all the other species. In form it seems
more slender. Length about 6" 6 or 7, wing 3” 9" tail
3” 3", tarsi 1” 1!”, bill 1”. If new, I propose for this species
the name of PriLoTis FLAVO-AURITA.

LAMPROLIA VicTtoRIa&, Finsch.

One of my chief objects in proceeding to Tayiuni was to
see this singular and beautiful species in its native haunts.
It frequents the higher ranges of the mountains, never by any
chance coming down to the sea-level. Itis, as far as my present
knowledge goes, confined to the island of Taviuni—though
a gentleman, on whose observations I do not place much con-
fidence, has assured my son that he has seen it on the neigh-
bouring islands of Vanua Levu. A lad also told me, both it
and the ‘Orange Dove” (C. victor) inhabit the Jasawas
group of islands. It is never seen together in greater numbers

sgt te ee aR
‘Em atte un *

oink

Birds of the Fiji Islands. 149

than three—a family party, father, mother, and chick ; for,
strange to say, the female never lays more than one egg. We
found so many nests with solitary nestlings, and saw so many
family parties, that there can be no doubt of the fact, which,
so far as I can call to mind, is unique among the Insessores.
We were a month or three weeks too late for their eggs, and
too early for the second hatch, which I suspect they have, as
the forest was full of young birds. The nests had chiefly
fully fledged-young ones; and only one had a single fresh egg ;
off this last I shot the female. ‘This nest was built at the
forked extremity of a thin horizontal twig, about four feet from
the ground (none that we saw were out of reach of our hands),
composed of fibres and the macerated strands of a species of
flag, and lined with feathers, among which I detected the
brilliant yellow breast-plumes of Pachycephala torquata (to
which they seemed partial) and those of Carpophaga latrans.
The structure, though light, is tolerably thick ; diam. 3! 9!"
outside, 1! 9" inside; depth 2 9!". The eggs have a pale pink
ground, generally coloured with dark pink spots of various
sizes, the colour of which seems to have run at the edges.
Another egg was almost white, with minute pink freckles ;
but it was addled, and, I think, a season old, and consequently
bleached. Axis (of the good egg) 1", diam. 9".

In habits Lamprolia victorie shows considerable affinity to
Thamnobia in its jerky motions, mode of flight, clambering
up the thick (or thin) lianas, drooping its wings and elevating
its tail. My son saw one clinging upright to a tree and dig-
ging into an ants’ nest ; one had its mouth full of white ants,
destined probably for its young. It has a variety of cries,
but no song (that we heard); it chattered defiance at us if
near its nest, and was not at all shy. At other times it ut-
tered a stridulouscry. The mouth of the young bird is bright
yellow inside. When flying through the forest its course 1s
pretty straight and swift, not jerky or undulating; it rarely,
if ever, ascends trees of any altitude, always keeping to the
undergrowth.

RHIPIDURA ALBICOLLIS, Layard.
This pretty little “ Fan-tail” is rather abundant in Taviuni.

150 Mr. E. L. Layard on some little-known

It was breeding during our visit; and we found several nests,
but mostly with young ones. The structure is always placed
in the fork of a perpendicular twig, composed of very fine
fibrous material and the hairs of the young shoots of tree-
ferns densely felted together. The interior of the nest is
lined with coarser fibre. They all end in a long tail running
down the perpendicular twig to which they are attached,
though at the same time they are supported by a lateral twig
running through their substance. Diam. outside 2" 9",
inside 1" 9!; depth inside 1" 9", from tip to end of tail 5” or 6";
but I saw one fully 9”. The eggs are white, with various-
sized brown-pink spots, rather inclining to form a ring at the
greatest diameter, which is 7”, axis 84!". This species is ge-
nerally distributed, and, from its bold manner and Joud cries
of defiance, sure to attract notice. It follows the intruder on
its haunts, chattering, scolding, spreading its fan-shaped tail,
drooping its rounded wings, and, in fact, menacing its sup-
posed foe till he has passed beyond its domain.

Myracra azurEocaritya, Layard, Ibis, 1875, p. 434.

This lively bird was another of my attractions to Taviuni;
and we devoted many hours of special hunting for them.
They haunt the densest forest, and are partial to “ cane-
brakes” and tangles of lianas. My son, who procured the
majority of our specimens, says he rarely found them except
in pairs, and that the love-making of the male was very
curious; standing on his tip toes, he elevated his lovely azure
crest and uttered shrill cries to his more sombre-coloured
mate. On Leopold shooting a female that cried out on being
captured, the male fairly attacked him, and would not leave
him, even for a sufficient distance to save his being blown to
pieces by the discharge, for many minutes. We failed to find
any nest, though (from the sexual development) they must
have been breeding, or about to do so. :

Mr. Tempest has sent me a young bird of this species from
Bua. He says he thought it anon-breeding female; but the
throat is a brighter chestnut-colour than others in my collec-
tion, and the head has a blue tinge. I think it a young male,
and that in youth this sex resembles the female.

Birds of the Fiji Islands. 151

ERYTHRURA PEALEI, Hart).

This exquisite little Finch, instead of being, like other
members of his family, an inhabitant of the open country,
feeding on grass-seeds, is a dweller in the dense forest, fre-
quenting the high trees and living on berries, such as the
Orange Dove eats. I am now quite certain that the Finch
I saw at Nandranga and Naudi, on the coast of Viti Levu,
living in flocks in the deserted fields, was not this species, but
another, probably Amadina optata, F. & H. I distinctly saw
the red rump; and the cry was quite that of Amadina, and di-
stinct from that of Hrythrura. The latter never goes in flocks ;
and we rarely saw them except singly.

MERULA VANICORENSIS, Quoy.

This bird, though not included in Finsch and Hartlaub’s
catalogue as a Fijian bird, has been sent me from Bua by
Mr. Tempest, obtained, at an elevation of over 600 feet, at
a place called Kandi.

Curyse@na victor, Gould. |

This gorgeous Dove is the glory of the forest of Taviuni,
and, I now find, is more generally distributed over a certain
range of country than I suspected. It certainly is found in
Lanthala and Rambi islands, and on Vanua Levu, about Bua,
Ndreketti, &c.; and this, coupled with the discovery of the
other species of birds already alluded to in this paper as residing
there, seems to point to the fact that at no very distant date
(geologically speaking) these islands were joined together, and
not, as now, separated by the straits of Somo-Somo. Those
of ‘The Ibis’ brotherhood who have shot the “Cock of the
Rock,’ can readily picture to themselves the “ flame” of the
Orange Dove as he pursues some rival through the green
forest—the eye fairly dazzled as the orange ball on golden
wings turns and twists in the sunlight. Dull days do not
suit him a bit, and he hides away and mopes, never uttering
a sound; but with the bright sun he emerges from his retreat,
and ‘‘clucks” to his green wife from many a “ cool retreat.”
The young males never utter this sound, and would be mis-
taken for females, but that the vent is more orange. . They

152 Mr. E. L. Layard on the Ornithology of Fit.

breed about December or November, making a rude platform
of small twigs for a nest, not usually above 8 or 10 feet from
the ground, and laying two eggs, pure white, axis 1" 4!"
diam. 1". .

People have told me they have taken the young birds
orange-coloured from the nest, and seen orange females. I
regret to say I don’t believe them !

C. victor feeds on many sorts of small and large berries and
fruits, swallowing them whole.

GALLUS DOMESTICUS.

Among other presents left by Capt. Cook when he visited
these islands, were enumerated Fowls ; and some of the earlier
navigators'who followed him mentioned the fact of their having
taken to the bush and gone wild. They are now found rouam-
ing free on many of the islands; and it was no uncommon
thing to be greeted by a loud “ cock-a-doodle-doo ” as we
wound our early way along the narrow tracks of the forest.
Some of these descendants of the old stock have gone back
to the “ Game-fowl”’ colours; others still show traces of the
“ Dunghill.” The natives catch them in snares and springes ;
but we shot some and captured a chick, which, with its mother
and a rooster, I hope may form a group in the British Mu-
seum as a product of our new colony of Fiji.

STREPSILAS INTERPRES (L.).

Our short visit to Koro Island procured us a specimen of
this bird, a female, in fine spring plumage. It is very scarce
in the colony, and does not, I think, breed with us.

’
;

XV.—WNotes on the Ornithology of Fuji, with Descriptions of
new or little-known Species. By HK. L. Layarp, C.M.G.,
F.ZS., &c., H.B.M. Consul.

As there are several collectors of birds now in Fiji, who
are transmitting specimens to Europe and Australia, I deem
it advisable to forward descriptions of such novelties as fall
under my own observation, as they occur, for publication in
the pages of ‘ The Ibis.’

Mr. E. L. Layard on the Ornithology of Fiji. 15

or
cs

MYIOLESTES COMPRESSIROSTRIS, 0. Sp.

This apparently new species is intermediate between my M.
macrorhynchus and M. vitiensis, Hartl. ; but the remarkably
thin compressed bill, with its very white base, at once dis-
tinguishes it. In size it is nearest to WM. vitiensis, Hartl.,
being, length 6” 6!, wing 3" 4!", tail 3", tarse 10, bill 12”.
In coloration it closely resembles Mf. macrorhynchus, but is
rather redder in general tint, and has the broad whitish tips
to the tail-feathers found in M. vitiensis.

My old servant, C. Pearce, who has been collecting in
Kandavu, at my suggestion, has brought thence several
new birds; but as they are for Mr. Ramsay, of Sydney, I re-
frain from naming them. Among them, however, is.a gigantic
Myiolestes, far exceeding M. macrorhynchus in size, though
resembling it somewhat in colour; but its bill is the chief

feature ; this measures, length 1" 3!”, depth 6!, breadth at
rill

gape 7

This variation is most interesting ; and I am convinced that
had I the opportunity of working all of the larger islands of
the group, I should find that each (or at least certain con-
geries) possessed distinct faunas.

Pearce informs me that my Green Dove (Chrysena viridis,
is the Dove of Kandavu; and it certainly is not found else-
where. He also has procured my Merula bicolor, Petreca
pusilla, a new Rhipidura, a new Warbler of a genus unknown
to me, and fine specimens of my two new birds, Piilotis pro-
vocator and Zosterops explorator. Z. flaviceps is also found
there, he tells me. ;

Mervta Bicotor, Layard.

Of this species I can now add a more detailed description
from specimens brought by Mr. Pearce. Length 7”, wing
4", tail 8", tarse 1” 3", bill 18. Throughout, with the ex-
ception of the head and chest, sooty black, not iridescent ;
the whole of the head and chest is cinnamon-red ; bill and
feet orange. The female is less brilliant than the male, and
the separation between the red of the chest and black of the
body not so well defined.

SER, III.—VOL. VI. M

nace :

154 Mr. E. L. Layard on the Ornithology of Fiz.

Mr. Pearce tells me they scrape about the ground under
bushes in the forest, for worms &c., and are quite like Black-
birds in their habits and note. |

PACHYCEPHALA VITIENSIS, Gray.

Abundant at Kandavu, and apparently the only species
there. Mr. Pearce obtained nests and eggs, shooting the male
off one. The egg (a single one), hard-set, was large, irre-
gularly marked at the obtuse end, somewhat in the shape of
a ring, with large ill-formed purplish blotches. Breeds in
September.

The nest is a coarse transparent structure of thickish root-
lets, with here and there a patch of cobweb. No lining of
any kind. External diam. 4”, intern. 2” 6"; ext. depth 2” 6”,
intern. 1” 6”; placed in a low shrub between two lateral
branches.

The genus Pachycephala is widely distributed over these
‘islands; and the species composing it differ, as do those of
Myiolestes ; | am only just getting to have some clear idea
of them. On Ovalau, and up the Rewa, the true P. icteroides
(Peale) seems to prevail; but in the former place specimens
are sometimes found with the yellow patch on the nostril that
characterizes P. graeffii, Hartl., but the yellow of the under-
parts is not nearly so dark. About Tai Levu, on the N.E.
coast of Viti Levu, a species is found with the light-yellow
underparts of P. icteroides, but with a perfect though narrow
black ring round the neck. I propose to call this P. inter-
media, Layard, as it is intermediate between P. icteroides and
my P. torquata on the one hand, and between the former and
P. vitiensis on the other, the last-named having a white
throat. | |

At Bua, on Vanua Levu, P. graeffii, Hartl., prevails, and
on Tavinui only my P. torquata.

I suspect that a close investigation of some of the re-
maining islands of the group will reveal other varieties of
this genus. |

Mr. Klinesmith has just discovered a new Lamprolia near
Savu-Savu Bay, on Vanua Levu, which resembles L. victoria,

= big tari FF SE ENE ae A

Mr. E. L. Layard on the Ornithology of Fiji. 155

but is about a third smaller, and the head is entirely covered
with the brilliant blue feathers. He has named it L. minor.

Pritotis PRovocAToR, Layard, P.Z. 8. 1873, p. 28. 3

Mr. Pearce obtained at Kandavu in September three nests
of this species, each containing a single egg. The nest is a
light structure, composed of fine rootlets, and lined with bents
of a thin wiry grass, with a base of cotton and feathers. Ext.
diam. 4", intern. 2” 6"; ext. depth 2" 6!", intern. 1” 61".

The egg is a pale salmon-colour, spotted throughout with
dark red, and indistinct, very pale, purple blotches, small,
and the latter grouped chiefly in the form of a ring at the
greatest diameter. Axis 18”, diam. 9!"

It is singular that I have to chronicle two other Fijian
birds apparently only laying one egg! Is this the rule or
the exception? If the former, it accounts for the paucity of
individuals one sees in the forest.

RALLINA P@cILOPTERA, Hartl.

On the 9th October, 1875, a male and four eggs of this
species were brought to me from the Rewa. The latter are
of a warm brown cream-colour, marked throughout, but espe-
cially at the thick end, with irregularly shaped and sized
spots and blotches, of indistinct pale purple and dry blood-
colour. Axis 2”, diam. 1" 6'. On blowing them they were
found just beginning to be hard-set.

The male, judging from two pairs I have in my collection,
is rather smaller than the female.

The natives say this bird never takes wing. On the point
of the spurious winglet there is a small stiff spur, black, with
a white tip, and about half an inch in length.

STERNA MELANAUCHEN.

I am induced to give the following description of this
species, taken from a fresh-killed specimen, as it differs
considerably from that given by Jerdon in his ‘Birds of
India’ :—

Bill and feet black ; tip of bill and claws white; eye brown ;
inside of bill (mouth) deep orange-red. The whole of the

M 2

156 Mr. E. L. Layard on the Ornithology of Fy.

under plumage suffused with delicate pink, which is visible
even under the delicate grey of the back; it extends over the
underside of the wings. An outer tail-feather, just growing,
is a rich pink, deepest near the root, the shaft is also pmk;
this fades as the feather grows older and more elongated ;
outer vane of first wing-primary jet-black.

Shot on the reef at Ovalau, October 4th, 1875, by my son.
Stomach contained bones and scales of small fish. Other
specimens have since been obtained and seen; and on the
10th of October I saw what I am convinced were three ex-
amples of Anous cinereus (Néboux). I believe that visits to
the Yassawas and low-lying islands to windward would add
largely to the list of sea-fowl inhabiting Fiji. I obtained A.
cinereus abundantly, nearly twenty years ago, on the coral
islands to the N.E. of Madagascar.

ARDEA SACRA, Gmel.

A reference to the synonyms of this bird, given by Drs.
Finsch and Hartlaub in their ‘ Fauna Central-Polynesiens,’
and Jerdon’s ‘ Birds of India’ (vol. ii. p. 748), shows the
confusion that exists as to the identity of the Indian and Aus-
tralian birds. |
I perceive that Jerdon says, on my authority, that the
young birds are white. I have not my notes of Ceylon birds
with me; but if J remember rightly, after so many years, I
found it breeding near Tangalle in tolerable plenty.

I have just obtained (2nd November) a pair of young
ones, male and female, from the nest, of the species that in-
habits these islands; and they are dark slate-coloured—much
blacker and glossier, in fact, than a slate-coloured bird in full
plumage, although long filaments of white down still remain
on the head &c. Europeans and natives assure me that they
‘breed in both phases of plumage, and that sometimes a white
‘bird will be mated with a dlue one.

It nests indifferently on rocks, on the ground, or in the
mangrove or other trees that line the sea-shore.

Now, if the Indian bird is always white when young, and
our bird is slate-coloured, may not that fact indicate that the

: Pi Siemans allied

4
a
4
u
4
7
;

’ =

oery

— -

Notes from the Neighbourhood of Buenos Ayres. 157

two are distinct? or are the white and slate birds only di-
morphic varieties? Has any one seen the Asiatic race slate-
coloured when in the nest, or observed the slate-coloured
and white birds breeding together in India ?

XVI.— Ornithological Notes from the Neighbourhood of Buenos
Ayres. By Henry Durnrorp.

Tue following notes were made during the first five months
of my residence near this town, and, under many difficul-
ties, at such times as I could spare from other employ-
ment. The determination of the names of the skins I have
made I owe to Dr. Burmeister’s kindness, who has ever been
ready to render me all the assistance in his power*. Most
of my notes have been made at Belgrano, where I live, a
place situated about six miles to the north-west of Buenos
Ayres, on the shores of the La Plata. I have also visited
other localities, the names of which appear in the body of my
notes.
SYLVIIDA.

I saw two individuals of Polioptila dumicola on 10th Oc-
tober of the present year (1875), in some marshy ground near
San Isidro. They were hunting amongst the reeds, some-
what like Tits (Parus).

TROGLODYTIDA.

Troglodytes furvus (called “ Ratoncito”’ by the natives) is
very abundant; it has a pretty little song, which it pours
forth from the top of some bush, or perched on an aloe-leaf.
On the 10th October I found eggs; the complement in a nest is
usually five. The eggs are small and much speckled with red.
I have seen many; and they differ considerably in different
nests. These are made of bits of rush and grass, warmly
lined with wool and feathers, and are generally placed in the
stump of an old ombra-tree—the only indigenous tree, I be-

* [These names we have altered to correspond with those used in the
‘Nomenclator Avium Neotropicalium,’—Ep. |]

wees,

158 Mr. H. Durnford’s Notes from the

lieve, of the country, and useful for nothing but to keep off
the rays of the sun.

MoractLuipzZ. ’

Anthus rufus is very common, occasionally perching on
trees, bushes, &c. In its flight it circles upwards, like our
Sky-Lark, its voice, however, being far inferior to the song of
that bird. On September 28th a friend of mine took three
fresh eggs from a nest of grass lined with hair; and on Oc-
tober 5th I took three slightly incubated eggs from a nest
made entirely of cow’s hair.

MnioriLtTip&.
A single specimen of Parula pitiayumi is the only member
of this family I have yet met with. It came so close to me
that I knocked it over with my stick.

HIRUNDINID.
. Progne purpurea was first seen on September 22nd; by
October 13thit wascommon. On April 8rd I saw a specimen
of Hirundo leucorrhoa flying over the island of Flores, to the
east of Buenos Ayres; and on August 10th I observed others
at Belgrano ; from the latter date to the 18th they appeared
sparingly, the weather being cloudy and unsettled ; by Oc-
tober 9th they were busily engaged in building their nests, and
were very abundant. I often observe birds of this species
clinging to the trunks of large willow trees which are full of
holes ; they also perch on twigs just outside the holes; and
once I saw one sitting on the edge of a large opening in a
branch. On October 3rd I saw two pairs of Alticora cyano-
leuca frequenting some holes in a sand-pit near Flores; as
they often returned to the pit, and clung to the face of its
perpendicular sides, I think they had nests near. I thrust
the whole length of my walking-stick into two or three of the
holes, without touching the end of any of them. I am told
this Swallow remains the whole year near Buenos Ayres; and
a friend assures me that he once shot one when Duck-shooting
in the winter.
FRINGILLIDE.
Zonotrichia pileata, the Sparrow of this country, is very

pate

Neighbourhood of Buenos Ayres. 159

abundant, and is now (October) nesting everywhere. The
nest is made of moss, lined with hair, and sometimes a little
wool ; it is usually to be found at the foot of a small tree or
bush. The complement of eggs seems to be four; they vary
exceedingly, but always have the appearance of belonging to
a Finch. From the 5th to the 10th of September I saw
Chrysomitris magellanica common near Ranchos, about 70
miles from Buenos Ayres; they were frequenting the Eu-
calyptus trees planted in the neighbourhood.

IcTERIDA.

Molothrus bonariensis I frequently see, being most common
in marshy ground. <Ageleus thilius was in flocks at Punta
Lara on June 29th, when I shot a male; the females were
scarcer, and did not mix with the other sex, but were also in
flocks. In October the species was common at Belgrano,
but in pairs. On July 8th I saw four individuals at Punta
Lara ; one of those I shot had been feeding on some aquatic
plants, the seeds of which were in its mouth when I picked
it up. I have not seen this bird since, but am told that it is
common and resident here. Sturnella defilippit is common in
the winter in large flocks.

TYRANNID.

Sisopygis icterophrys is pretty common in damp situations
amongst trees and low bushes, from the Ist to 13th October.
From May to September I saw many Lichenops perspicillata,
usually singly, at most in pairs. I feel pretty sure that the
female is the ferruginous, and the male the black bird, as I
have constantly seen the two paired. On October 13th they
were still common, but not yet building.

On August 3rd I shot a specimen of Machetornis rixvosa
from a flock that. were dusting themselves in the road; it
does not appear to be a common bird. Mapalocercus flavi-
ventris is abundant in rushes and low bushes from October
Ist to the middle of the month. _Serpophaga subcristata
is common here; its nest is a beautiful little structure
of lichen and horsehair, lined with feathers. I have taken
several nests, none of which contained more than two eggs.

160 Mr. H. Durnford’s Notes from the

Sometimes the nest is placed in the fork of a tree, some-
times in a low bush about three feet from the ground.
~Cyanotis azare was pretty common at Punta Lara on July
8th, in the extensive tract of marsh-land which lies about
thirty miles from Buenos Ayres, to the south-east; at Bel-
grano I have not yet seen it. Itis very Tit-like in its move-
ments, diligently hunting over every little clump of reeds.
The male and female are apparently alike. Megarhynchus
pitangua (called here “‘ Bien te veo” (well do I see you) from
its note) is common everywhere, being a conspicuous bird.
_ It often leaves its post of observation to chase some large
dragonfly or other insect, returning many times to its perch.
On October 3rd I found a deserted nest containing a broken
egg; it was an untidy structure, made of bits of rags, wool,
feathers, and hair. On October 6th I found another, which the
birds were still building. The first Pyrocephalus rubineus I
saw was on September 20th; they are now (15th October)
abundant everywhere at Belgrano, but are not yet nesting.
They have a habit of leaving the twig or bough on which
they perch and making a forage for insects, just as our com-
mon Flycatcher does at home; they hover in the air, too, for
many seconds together. Milvulus tyrannus, the Tijereta or
Scissor-bird, I first saw on October 9th at Belgrano. At
Flores it was first seen on October 16th; now it is common,
but has not yet commenced nesting.

DENDROCOLAPTIDA.

Furnarwus rufus, the “ Hornero,” or Oven-bird, is very com-
mon here. On August Ist I watched a pair repairing their
nest ; but the eggs seem to be laid much later in the year; for
on Ooh: 9th I examined another empty nest, and a friend
visited a nest without eggs on the 13th. The bird utters a
loud piping note whenever the vicinity of its nest is invaded.
Of Synallaxis I have noticed several species, but have not yet
made them out sufficiently to say what they are. One species
makes, for its size, an enormous nest ; and this, placed in a tree
at various heights from the ground, is constructed of sticks and
lined with hair and wool, the aperture being near the top.

Neighbourhood of Buenos Ayres. 16]

Inside there are two rooms as it were, a passage leading from
one to the other; in the lower the eggs are laid, the upper
one, it is supposed, being used as a roosting-place all the year
round. Placellodomus frontals 1s not at all rare, frequenting
damp places; I have found and identified three nests, all of
which were placed at the ends of boughs about eight feet from ~
the ground, being always of an oblong shape, never so round
as that of the next species. The nest consists of sticks and
twigs, lined with hair, and sometimes wool; the full com-
plement of eggs is four. This species has very skulking habits.
Placellodomus ruber is also common in marshy ground ;
its nest is similar to that of the last-mentioned species, and
constructed of the same materials, but is rounder in shape.
The bird is not easy to identify, as when disturbed it hides
itself amongst thick reeds or bushes. The eggs are white,
the full complement being four or five. They are similar to
those of P. frontalis, but rather larger.

STRIGIDE.

The Short-eared Owl (Otus brachyotus) is common in open
lands, but is not often seen here; it flies towards dark, and
feeds on beetles. The Burrowing-Owl (Pholeoptynx cunicu-
laria) is abundant, building in holes in the ground ; it is an
Owl of diurnal habits, being fond of sitting on a thistle or
clod of earth, whence it flies to seize insects on the wing.
Its flight is undulatory, and performed by rapid strokes of the
wings. From May to September this bird was common near
here; after that they appear to have betaken themselves to
the campo to build in the Biscacha- and Armadillo-holes,
which there abound.

FALconiIp#.

Two or three pairs of Buteo pterocles frequent a wood near
Chirilcay, about 100 miles from Buenos Ayres; the male is
slightly smaller than the female. The “ Chimango” (Milvago
chimango) is very common, frequenting the open campos in
preference to the enclosed country. Polyborus tharus (the
“ Carrancha”’) is common, especially in marshy places ; it
feeds indiscriminately on dead fish, lizards, carcasses of

162 Mr. H. Durnford’s Notes from the

horses, cattle, sheep, or other carrion, and it is said some-
times to pick out the eyes of very young sheep. On Sep-
tember 18th an undoubtedly genuine egg was sent me from
Entre Rios. A nest I found myself near Belgrano was in
the middle of a large swamp; it was a massive structure,
composed of sticks and lined with a little coarse hair and
sheep’s wool, and was full of putrid bits of horse-skin and
bones of fish; it measured 5 feet round and 14 deep, and
contained three young ones about a week old. Two of these
I preserved, leaving one in the nest; but it was gone on
October 6th, and the nest relined with cow’s-hair, evidently
for a second brood. On the 13th no eggs had been laid.

’

PHALACROCORACIDA.

Phalacrocoraz brasilianus I often see. I shot one, March
25th, on Flores Island.

ARDEID&.

Ardea cocoi is tulerably common both in Banda Oriental
and the banks of this river. On October 8rd I saw a Little
Bittern, probably <Ardetta involucris. I have also met with
another species of Heron, which I take to be Ardea sibilatriz ;
but I have not yet made it out satisfactorily.

CICONIID.

Ciconia maguarit is common in every marsh of any extent.

PLATALEIDZA.

Falcinellus igneus is very common; it has a strong smell,

owing to the carrion it eats. During the last fortnight in
September I noticed a large flock flying northwards; a
friend who lives on the other side of Buenos Ayres noticed
one also. There are still (Oct. 15th) some about here.

PALAMEDEIDZ.

Chauna chavaria is common on all sides of Buenos Ayres.
On October 3rd I observed a pair near here; but I have not
yet ascertained if they breed in the neighbourhood. When
wounded it is said to defend itself with its formidable spur.

ae ast eseentiniiaaiatiiai

ow Zz.
ste

Neighbourhood of Buenos Ayres. 163

ANATIDE.

Two Swans (Cygnus nigricollis and C. coscoroba) are occa-
sionally to be seen at this time (Oct. 15th), usually flying
southwards, most of them having left for breeding-quarters.
Querquedula cyanoptera is not uncommon ; I have shot a few
at intervals between May and September. Dafila spinicauda
is abundant, and may even now (Oct. 15th) be seen in flocks,
though doubtless many are breeding. D.bahamensis I found
pretty common at Espartilla, a place about 100 miles south
of Buenos Ayres; I have not seen it elsewhere, though I am
told it is not uncommon. The Chilian Wigeon (Mareca chi-
loensis) 1s not very common, though I have shot several.
Spatula platalea is abundant, and the easiest to shoot of the
Ducks of this district. Metopiana peposaca is a most wary
species, but the best of all for the table; it is common every-
where. -I procured a specimen of Hrismatura ferruginea in
the market, but have not yet seen it alive. I have shot a
smaller species, but of which I have not yet made skins; and
this, I suppose, is HE. dominica.

CoLUMBID#.

Zenaida maculata is, I believe, common in the province ;
but, as yet, I have only once met with it; and this was on
August 2nd, at Chirilcay, about 100 miles from Buenos Ayres,
when a vast flock passed over my head. Columbula picui is
very common, keeping in large flocks during the winter : it
is an early breeder; for on September 26th I found a nest
with two eggs, and on October 3rd one with two young about
a week old. The nest is very small for the size of the bird,
so that when she sits she shows the whole of her head and
neck on one side and her tail on the other.

RALLIDz.

Porphyriops melanops. Of this species I flushed and shot
one on the banks of a lagoon about 100 miles south of this
place, and saw another. Birds of this species may possibly
be commoner than they seem ; for their skulking habits keep
them out of sight. There is a Coot here which goes in large
flocks, and has the habits of our Bald Coot.

164 Mr. H. Durnford’s Notes from the

CHARADRIIDZ.
Vanellus cayennensis is very abundant; and fresh eggs are

to be obtained on September 10th; on the 27th I saw young |

on the wing, which must have been bred quite early in the
season. The nest is exactly like that of the Peewit, but larger,
though the eggs are not larger than those of that bird. It
frequently cries at night just as our bird does. Hudromias
modesta is very good eating; one was shot on Flores Island
out of a flock on 30th March ; I have often observed it out
on the campo.

THINOCORID.

Thinocorus rumicivorus 1 found common from May to Sep-
tember, and always in flocks. It seems equally fond of wet
swamps and the dry campos. When disturbed-they fly round,
uttering a low whistle, and invariably alight head to wind.
They remind me of flocks of Calidris arenaria as they stand
motionless on the ground.

SCOLOPACIDA.

Himantopus brasiliensis is a very common species here, both
in small flocks and singly ; on May 27th I shot one changing
to winter plumage, its head mottled with black and grey ;
on June 29th I found them common at Punta Lara, all in
winter plumage. -Gallinago frenata is the only true Snipe
here, and is abundant in every marsh in the country ; it is
now (15th Oct.), I believe, breeding ; but I have not yet found
a nest, though a marsh near contains two or three pairs.
Rhynchea semicollaris in habits much resembles a Snipe,
flying but a short distance, and lying close until nearly trodden
upon; I have found two nests of this species, one on Sep-
tember 20th, the other on October 5th; they were in a
swamp about a mile from this; each was formed of a few
pieces of reed in a slight depression in the ground; one was
quite exposed in an open spot, the other under the shelter of
a tuft of grass; each contained two eggs, from which the old
birds of both were flushed. The eggs measure 1°5 by ‘9 inch,
and are not very sharply pointed; they are of a dull dirty
white ground, which is almost hidden by numerous spots and

eal BAG ls

Neighbourhood of Buenos Ayres. 165

blotches of dark umber-brown and black distributed over the
whole egg. Gambetta flavipes are common, and on October
10th were still in flocks; so that they cannot be nesting,
though the time must be near.

LARIDz.

A Tern I saw in March on Flores Island, and again in May
on the shores of the La Plata, near Monte Video, I believe
to have been Sterna trudeaui; but of this I am not certain.
I saw a flock of Sterna superciliaris during a very stormy day
in May, beating against the wind close inshore, near the
custom-house at Monte Video; I have no doubt about the
species, which appears on the wing to be a little larger than
S. minuta. Of Gulls, Larus dominicanus is pretty common ;
and on September 10th I shot one in full summer plumage.
This Gull goes far inland; for in September I found it com-
mon about 100 miles south of Buenos Ayres, in the campo,
where it feeds upon dead sheep, horses, &c. Larus maculi-
pennis is the commonest species here; they commence as-
suming their spring dress about the middle of July; they
feed on worms and insects, and also on carrion. This bird
much resembles our L. ridibundus in its actions and flight
and voice. I believe it nests in the open campo, some distance
to the south of Buenos Ayres; there are eggs in the mu-
seum from this neighbourhood which resemble those of L.
ridibundus, except that they are larger. I have not as yet,
so far as I am aware, seen L. cirrhocephalus.

PoDICIPITIDZ.

Ai chmophorus major I have observed frequently in Banda
Oriental, as well asenear Buenos Ayres. I have also seen
Tachybaptus dominicus near Monte Video in full summer
plumage ; in August and September I saw it here on small
streams, but during these months always in pairs.

TINAMIDZ.
Nothura maculosa is abundant wherever there is cover; a
friend of mine found a nest with one egg as early as July.

——— ——j

166 Mr. R. Ridgway on the Genus Helminthophaga.

It is not so good to eat as a Partridge, and shows but poor
sport, seeking to evade dogs by running, and when flushed
flying low. Rhynchotis rufescens was some years ago quite
common near Buenos Ayres; but now “ civilization” has
driven it backwards, so that it is not to be found in any
numbers within 100 miles of this place. It is stili abundant
at Chirilcay, where it is caught by men and boys on horse-
back. When a bird. is sighted the horseman commences
riding round it in narrowing circles, until he can pass a horse-
hair noose over its head from the end of a long stick. The
bird, when alarmed, invariably squats instead of running
away. Inthe country they are to be bought for 2d..a piece ;
in the town they fetch from ls. 6d. to 2s. 6d. each. The
flesh is white and dry. One I flushed in the campo rose
straight. up, like a Pheasant, and then flew with a steady
flight about 300 yards before it settled again.

XVII.—Notes on the Genus Helminthophaga.
By Rosert Ripeway.

Tue genus Helminthophaga ranks second in importance in the
family Mniotiltide, one of the most characteristic of the Ne-
arctic avifauna of all belonging to that region; and its nu-
merous species are all strictly North American. They are
distinguished for their graceful form, and, with few excep-
tions, for their very pretty or even beautiful colouring.

As is the case with the species of the genus Dendreca, the
most numerous of all the Mniotiltide, the species of Helmin-
thophaga belong chiefly to the Eastern Province, only four of
the ten that are known being found in the country westward
of the Rocky Mountains; and two of these are common to
both halves of the continent. But this remark may be deemed
superfluous when it is recalled that the same may be said of
the family in general, of whose sixty-one species known to
occur within the United States, as many as thirty-nine, or
about two thirds, are confined to the Eastern Province; while
the proportion of peculiar genera stands as nine eastern to none

ES I Fahne

———

Mr. R. Ridgway on the Genus Helminthophaga. 167

westernt. During the breeding-season the species of Hel-
minthophaga are distributed as follows :—

Eastern Province. mi ester
rovince.
: r=
E q
rr le MA = (Ol as age 5
coed! T9> oe eS iam Opel aA yee ho a
= acu NEES Sian
[ea] As 3 (ss t= 1 °
BG Whe ok ER aps Sak 8 RN As
Sigi/f/ eles sis] 4
eater me. tose Shee. aves t | Xie
ZT old old !/ als] aw
Meee bor 1 pana ae * | *
2. H. lawrenctt .......... ues eae Sh P
3. H. chrysoptera ........ ies fol abaethe ial | oat
4, H, leucobronchialis...... NAS i pee! bow Mel er
OL OULRMOHE ae Fak. «oink ee hha Saar se
edd SP OPLCUDING tg so. Pe Wess eee Peet Ae ate xan
(ited «RECS nna eR as dee abe (om tana CECE Lig
SSL NRG 2 Te RR bes PR ad eee etree he ce dh aie
RE ENG IE Te Cae ened Ty Phe eR wislag cade uc te) he oeck a
LORTL. DEPEGIING 9... 5 <4 eso om Borie
|

Regarding the characters of this genus Jittle need here be
said, beyond that it is distinguished from all other Mniotiltide,
except Parula and Perissoglossa, by its very acute bill, with
nearly straight culmen and gonys, and from these two genera
by the absence of a notch on the superior tomium of the bill,
and of rictal bristles at its base. The species all nest on or
near the ground (as is the habit of Geothlypis, Oporornis, and
Siurus), and lay white eggs, speckled, rather faintly, with

t It is, of course, understood that I do not here refer to the Mexican
genera Granatellus, Ergaticus, Cardellina, and Basileuterus, all of which
have representatives within our south-western border.

{t Specimens of a western race (gutturals, Ridgway, Hist. N. Am. B.
ii. p. 191) have been taken in the autumn at various localities in the
western portions of the United States, including even Southern California ;
it is therefore presumed that they were bred on the mountains to the
northward or in the interior.

§ This species occurs in two well-marked geographical races :—the true
celata, Say, belonging to the Eastern Province, including Florida and
Illinois, in winter, and the Rocky Mountains and Alaska; the other,
lutescens, Ridgw., Miser tanh to the Pacific district of the Western Pro-

vince, in summer,

168 Mr. R. Ridgway on the Genus Helminthophaga. 3

reddish brown, chiefly round the larger end. Several of the
species (notably ruficapilla, virginia, lucie, and celata) are
pleasing though rather weak-voiced songsters, while the song
of H. pinus closely resembles the monotonous lisping of certain
grasshoppers.

The species and geographical races may be distinguished
by the following characters :—

A. Wings variegated with white or yellow. Forehead yellow.

a. Wing with two white bands; belly yellow; back olive-green.

1. H. prnus. Throat gamboge-yellow; auriculars yellow, bordered
above by a short postocular streak. Eastern province of the
United States, in summer.

2. H. tawrencu. Throat deep black; auriculars deep black.
Eastern Province of the United States (New Jersey, Herrick).

6. Wing with a large patch of yellow covering both rows of coverts ;
belly white; back bluish grey.

3, H. eee! Throat deep black (¢) or dull grey (92)
auriculars deep black (¢), or black along upper edge (2).
Eastern Province of the United States.

4, H. LEUCOBRONCHIALIS. Throat pure white; auriculars white,
bordered above by a short postocular streak. Hastern Province
of the United States (Eastern Massachusetts, Brewster).

B. Wings not variegated. Forehead not yellow (except in H. bachmant).

a. Forehead yellow; inner web of the two outer tail-feathers with a
terminal white patch.

5. H. BacHMANI. Above olive-green ; forehead and belly gamboge-
yellow ; crown grey, in the ¢ bordered anteriorly by a black
bar; throat black (3) or dusky greyish (9). Eastern Province
(Southern Atlantic States) and Cuba.

6. Forehead greyish ; inner webs of outer tail-feathers without distinct
white patches.

6. H. RUFICAPILLA. Above olive-green; the head greyish; lower
parts gamboge-yellow; a whitish orbital ring. Male with a
concealed patch of chestnut onthe crown. North America (rare
in the Western Province).

. H. vireinre. Above grey, beneath whitish ; upper tail-coverts
yellowish green ; lower tail-coverts and patch on the jugulum
gamboge-yellow; crown with a concealed patch of chestnut
(sometimes obsolete in the 2). Western Province.

8. H. nuctm. Above grey, beneath buffy white; crown-patch and
upper tail-coverts chestnut, Western Province (south-western
district).

9..H. crenata. Above olive-green, beneath pale yellowish ; crown

“IT

Mr. R, Ridgway on the Genus Helminthophaga. 169

with a concealed patch of orange-rufous (obsolete in young, and
sometimes in adult ¢ also).

Above greyish, the head sometimes decidedly grey; beneath pale
greenish yellow; inner web of outer tail-feathers distinctly
edged with white. Eastern Province of North America (in-
eluding Trocky Nouittaine ies fates ees aes se ces a. celata.

Above bright olive-green, below greenish gamboge-yellow ; inner
webs of outer tail-feathers without distinct white edges. West-
ern Province of North America (Pacific district) .. 8. lutescens.

10. H. prreerina. A dusky streak through the eye; no rufous on
the crown ; above olive-green, the head and neck grey; beneath
white (adult), or pale dingy yellow (young). Eastern Province
of North America.

Of the foregoing species only the two recently described
admit of any doubt as to their perfect distinctness, all the
others having been so long known and thoroughly studied, that
all their variations of plumage are familiar. In H. lawrencii
the exactly intermediate coloration between H. pinus and H.
chrysoptera prompts strong suspicion that the unique example
upon which the species is based may be a hybrid between the
two ; there are, indeed, only two reasons for giving this theory
serious consideration, viz. the very strongly marked and rich
coloration, and the reluctance with which we are wont to resort
to the belief as to the possibility of hybridism as the real solu-
tion of the origin and nature of such intermediate specimens.
Should the bird eventually prove to illustrate the stable cha-
racters of a distinct species, it will be one of the most remark-
able illustrations of the evolution doctrine in the North-
American ornis*.

The case of H. leucobronchialis is somewhat different, there
being, instead of a combination of the coloration of two
species, simply an imperfect development, as it were, of a

* The combination of the characters of two very distinct and differently
coloured species, in this instance, calls to mind several parallel cases, one
of which it may be well to mention here. This one is noted in the
‘American Sportsman ’ for December 12th, 1874 (p. 117), as the capture,
by Mr. Christopher D. Wood, of Philadelphia, of a “‘black-crested and
throated Titmouse, the first one ever heard of.’’ It is there suggested
that the bird must be “either a sport or a cross between the common
Crested Titmouse (Leophophanes bicolor) and the Black-cap Titmouse
(Parus atricapillus).”’

SER. II1I.—VOL. VI. N

po rt PS ES
onee =

Sooo ae see eee oe Se

ae oS rns me -
= a ne =

—=——
i —

170 Mr. R. Ridgway on the Genus Helminthophaga.

single one of them. The coloration in this instance is as if
the black had been entirely removed ‘from the gular region
and auriculars of a typical adult male of H. chrysoptera,
leaving these parts entirely pure white, even to the roots of
the feathers. The first plumage of the latter species 1s un-
described and unknown to me; the adult female, however,
has, at all seasons, these parts of a dull ash-grey on the surface,
darker on the concealed portion of the feathers.

The names adopted are based on the following references :—

1. Hetminroornaca Pinus, Baird, Birds N. Am. 1858,
p. 254.
Certhia pinus, Linn. 8. N.1. 1766, p. 187.

2. HeLMINTHOPHAGA LAWRENCII, Herrick, Pr. Acad. Nat.
Sci. Philad. Nov. 1874, p. 220, pl. 15.

28) Her~MINTHOPHAGA CHRysoPpTERA, Cabanis, Mus. Hein.
1850-51, p. 20.
Motacilla chrysoptera, Linn. S. N. i. 1766, p. 333.

4, HELMINTHOPHAGA LEUCOBRONCHIALIS, Brewster, Ame-
erican Sportsman, Oct. 17, 1874, p. 33.

5. HELMINTHOPHAGA BACHMANI, Cabanis, Journ. fir Orn.
i. 1855, p. 475.

Helinaia bachmani, Aud. Orn. Biogr. i. 1834, p. 488,
pl. 183.

6. HELMINTHOPHAGA RUFICAPILLA, Baird, B. N. Am. 1858,
p. 256. 7

Sylvia ruficapilla, Wilson, Am. Orn. iii. 1811, p. 120, pl.
xxvu. fig. 3.

7. HELMINTHOPHAGA VIRGINIA, Baird, B. N. Am. 1858,
(under expl. plates, 1870) pl. Ixxix. fig. 1.

8. HeLMINTHOPHAGA LucIm, Cooper, Pr. Cal. Acad. Sc.
July 1861, p. 120. |

9, HELMINTHOPHAGA CELATA.

a. celata.
Helminthophaga celata, Baird, B. N. Am. 1858, p. 257.
Sylvia celata, Say, Long’s Exped. i. 1823, p. 129.

Notes on Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan,’ 171

B. lutescens.
Helminthophaga celata, var. lutescens, Ridgway, Am. Nat.
vil. Oct. 1878, p. 606.

10. HetmintuHorHaca PEREGRINA, Cabanis, Mus. Hein.
1851, p. 20.

Sylvia peregrina, Wilson, Am. Orn. iv. 1811, p. 83, pl. xxv.
fig. 2.

XVITI.—Notes on Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan’ (Turkes-
tanskie Jevotnie). By H. HE. Dresser.
[Continued from p. 94.]

180. LeproraciLE soPHia, sp. nov. Severtzoff, pp. 66, 135,
pl. viii. figs. 8, 9.

Stoliczkana stoliczke, Hume, Stray Feath. ii. a 513.

Horizontal range. Resident in district I.

Vertical range. Winters in district 3 and breeds in district 4.

At page 185 Dr. Severtzoff writes as follows :—“ In form
this bird approaches the Tits, but in habits and in the form
of the bill, as well as in the sexes being different, it differs
from these; and I have therefore deemed it best to sepa-
rate it generically. The characteristics are as follows: bill
slender, broader than high, compressed towards the end, nos-
trils narrow; bill half covered with a membrane; at the base
of the upper mandible are a few feathers, which are downy at
the base and hairy towards the point ; legs stout, tarsus long,
coarsely scutellated; hind toe large, with a long arched claw,
other toes also long, but the claws are short ; wings short
and broad ; tail long and much graduated, composed of twelve
feathers ; tarsus with three long and then four short broad
scales; 4th and 5th rectrices longest, the two central ones
1 shorter, and the outer ones 3” to 84" shorter ; Ist primary
short, twice as long as the coverts; 2nd quill shorter than the
10th, 3=9, 4=10, 5=6, the last two the longest. Male.
Crown bright brownish chestnut, glossed with violet ; a broad
yellowish white stripe passes over the eyes; back greyish
brown, washed with bluish; rump rich violet-blue; cheeks,
sides of the neck and of the body, and throat bright blue,

N 2

172 - Mr. H. E. Dresser’s Notes on

with a violet or greenish gloss ; centre of the abdomen brown-
ish yellow; under tail-coverts short and downy, brownish,
tipped with violet; wings blackish brown, with light brown
margins to the-feathers; rectrices nearly black, with bluish
green edges, outer web of outer rectrix white ; iris dark brown ;
beak and legs black. Female. Greyish, the lower flanks and
rump violet-blue, nape light brown, the superciliary stripe
narrower than in the male; cheeks and shoulders greyish

brown ; throat, breast, and belly light brownish yellow ; sides —

light brown, the feathers near the vent tipped with blue ;
erissum brownish ; wings blackish brown, with greyish brown
margins to the feathers; tail black, tipped with brown, the
outer feather externally margined with white. Male—total
length 4! 9", wing 2", tail 2” 14", outer tail-feathers 1” 84!"
culmen 32!, Female—total length 4" 8", extent 6! 1", wing
2" tail 2” 1", outer tail-feathers 1” 84!". This bird was met
with in the pine-woods near Issik-kul, where it was seen
amongst the branches of the trees.”

At page 135 he also describes a long-tailed Titmouse as new
under the name of Mecistura pélizami; and it is figured on
pl. ix. fig. 1. I do not, however, give a translation of his de-
scription ; for he now informs me that he has little doubt that
it is referable to Acredula tephronota (Ginth.). This bird, he
says, was found near Astrabad and on the island of Ashir-ade
by Mr. Poltzam, the curator of the Kasan Museum.

He also enumerates five species of Penduline Tits as oc-
curring in Turkestan, viz. Aigithalus pendulinus, AL. atrica-
pillus, A8. rutilans, 44. macronyx, and 4. coronatus, the last
four being described as new; but he brought his specimens
of these birds with him when he paid me a visit a short time
ago, and then told me that he had since found that 4%. atrica-
pillus and Ai. coronatus belong to the same species, and should
stand under the name of 4. coronatus, and that 4. rutilans
is the young of AZ. macronyx, under which latter name it
stands; and he also informed me that Mr. Hume’s Aigithalus
stoliczke is nothing but his 4. coronatus. He further
(p. 186) describes another species of Penduline Titmouse from
Astrachan (which does not, however, range as faras Turkestan)

ces es

Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan, 173

under the name of Aigithalus castaneus, respecting which he
writes as follows :—“ This species has been described by Prof.
HKversmann as the adult male of 4. pendulinus (Est. Ist.
Orenb. in. pp. 145-147) ;. but so far as I have ascertained
from researches in Orenburg, the male of true 4. pendulinus
is very different. The present species has the forehead, cheeks,
and sides of the head dark-coloured ; crown, nape, and down
to the back chestnut-red, becoming paler towards the rump,
where it is greyish brown; otherwise coloured as A’. pendu-
linus, but smaller in size. Eversmann says that the dark
marking on the cheeks extends over a smaller area, and the
crown is greyish in the female. But does he mean greyish
brown or true grey ? for in the latter case it would be a female
of At. pendulinus. Specimens obtained by Poéltzam near Astra-
chan, and now in the Kazan Museum, all agree in having the
crown and nape chestnut ; but the sexes of none are marked.’’

I have a very good series of the present bird, and con-
sider it an excellent species, quite distinct from 4. pendu-
linus. As already stated, Dr. Severtzoff describes Agithalus
coronatus under two names (44. atricapillus and A‘. coronatus),
and 4i. macronyx also under two names (44. macronyx and
44. rutilans) ; but it will be sufficient to give one description
of each. His description of 4. coronatus (p. 1386) 1s as fol-
lows :—‘‘ Forehead, sides of the head, both above and below
the eye, a portion of the nape and hind neck black; some of
the nuchal feathers tipped with white, and a small spot on
the-centre of the crown is also yellowish white ; below the
dark portion of the neck is a brownish white collar, and below
this, again, a band of chestnut ; rest of the upper parts brown-
ish grey; upper tail-coverts whitish, with broad dark greyish
fawn-coloured shaft-stripes; upper part of the throat pure
white ; lower throat, breast, and flanks marked with rust-
coloured spots, which are paler on the flanks; abdomen pale
brownish ; under tail-coverts white, marked with greyish
stripes ; lesser wing-coverts pale brownish, with a yellow
tinge ; the larger coverts black, with brownish white tips,
externally broadly margined with chestnut-red, so that when
the wing is closed the darker portion of the feather is con-

174 My. H. E. Disease Notes on

cealed ; quills dark greyish fawn, with pale brownish edges ;
tail-feathers margined with white; beak small, thin, and
pointed ; hind toe longer than the claw; tarsus covered with
two long and four short scales; tail forked, the central rec-
trices 2" shorter than the outer ones; Ist primary short, a
little longer than the coverts, 2=6, 3=4=5, the last the
longest. Total length 4” 7", extent 6" 6”, wing 2” 4", tail
1” 7", culmen 3", thickness 1", tarsus 53!, middle toe 34!",
hind toe 2!, hind claw 2, I met with this bird at Chodjent
in May 1868; and Mr. Fedchenko found it at Samarcand in
April 1869.” The next species (Aigithalus macronyz) is de-
scribed (p. 137) as follows :—“ Larger than 4. pendulinus,
the claws longer and stouter, and the legs stronger; Ist pri-
mary short, being equal in length to the coverts, 2=7, 3=6,
4=5, the two last the longest; beak rather flat and broad
- towards the tip, much larger than in 4. pendulinus. Colour
much as in 44. pendulinus ; but the black on the head covers
the forehead, sides of the head, and fore part and sides of the
crown; centre of the crown, nape, and hind neck pale brown-
ish yellow, this colour being separated from the pure brown
of the back by a narrow light chestnut band; throat greyish
white; breast and abdomen clear pale brownish; wings and
tail as in 44. pendulinus ; but the margins of the quills are not
whitish, but pale brownish; beak nearly black; legs plum-
beous. Total length 5” 1", extent 7", wing 2" 31", tail 2",
tarsus 63!", middle toe 44, hind toe 3!, middle claw 23"",
hind claw 32", culmen 4", thickness 4!",7?

In the table of geographical distribution (p. 66) the range

of the above species is given as follows :—

181. AiGITHALUS PENDULINUS.
Horizontal range. Breeds rarely, and is also rare in winter,
in district II., resident in district III.

Vertical range. Resident in district 1, breeds and occurs in

winter in district 2, breeds in district 3.

182. ARGITHALUS ATRICAPILLUS.
Horizontal range. Breeds in district III.

V8 ft Ae Gi

a as
—_ el *
= -

-
>

q
q

Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan.’ 175

Vertical range. Probably occurs in passage and breeds in
district 1; breeds in districts 2 and 3.

183. AlGITHALUS RUTILANS.
Horizontal range. Resident in district IIT.
Vertical range. Resident in district 1, and occurs in winter

in district 2.

184. AGITHALUS MACRONYX.
Range. Same as No. 188.

185. ASGITHALUS CORONATUS. |

Horizontal range. Breeds and possibly resident in dis-
trict IV.

Vertical range. Breeds in district 2.

All the above are figured on plate 9, viz. Aigithalus pendu-
linus (fig. 2, s.n. 4. pendulinus, var. jaxartica), Atgithalus
coronatus (fig. 3, s.n. 44. coronatus ; figs. 4&5, s.n. 4. atri-
capillus), and Algithalus macronyz (fig. 6, s. n. 44. rutilans,
var. cucullata; fig.7,s.n. 44. rutilans, var. pectoralis ; fig. 8,

44, macrony2x).

186. Crncuvs asraticus, Sw.; Severtzoff, p. 66.

Horizontal range. Resident in all four districts.

Vertical range. Resident in winter in district 3, breeds com-
monly and is rare in winter in district 4, and possibly breeds
in district 5.

187. ?CincLus LEUcocASTER, Eversm. ; Severtzoff, p. 66.

Horizontal range. Resident in all four districts.

Vertical range. Resident in districts 3 and 4, and occurs in
summer in district 5.

I have not had an opportunity of examining a specimen of
the Dipper from Turkestan; but it appears to me not impro-
bable that the species found there may prove to be C. cash-
miriensis, and not true C. leucogaster.

188 & 189. TrocLopyTEs PARVULUS, Koch.

Troglodytes nepalensis et T. europeus, Severtzoff, pp. 66,
LBB 3.1 2

Horizontal range. Resident in all four districts.

Vertical range. Breeds and is possibly resident in district

— = = =
Foe 2 =
Se ee et By =

176 Mr. H. E. Dresser’s Notes on

1, is found in winter in district 2, and breeds in district 4, and
possibly in district 3.

Dr. Severtzoff refers to two species of Wren as above; but
im a note pencilled on the margin of my copy of his work he
says that the Wren of Turkestan is not specifically distinct
from our European bird, being only a very slightly different
climatic variety, which he designates as Troglodytes europeus,
var. tianshanicus.

190. Sirra NEuMAYERI, Mich.

Sitta syriaca, Severtzoff, p. 66.

Horizontal range. Resident in all four districts.

Vertical range. Occurs in district 2 in winter, breeds and
is resident in district 3.

191. TichopRoMA MuRARIA (L.).

Tichodroma phenicoptera, Severtzoft, p. 66.

Horizontal range. Resident in all four districts.

Vertical range. Is found in winter in districts 1 and 2, but
rarely in the former, breeds in districts 3 and 4, and is resi-
dent in the former.

192. CERTHIA FAMILIARIS, Severtzoff, p. 66.

Horizontal range. Resident in district I., and occurs acci-
dentally in winter in district III.

Vertical range. Rare in winter in district 2, resident in dis-
trict 3, and breeds in district 4.

193. CeRTHIA HIMALAYANA, Vig.

Certhia teniura, Severtzoff, pp. 66, 128.

Horizontal range. Resident in districts III. and IV.

Vertical range. Similar to that of No. 192.

Of this species Dr. Severtzoff gives a careful description
and details of measurements, which I need not reproduce,
as he informs me that he has identified it with Certhia hi-
malayana.

194. Moraciiia auBa, L. ; Severtzoff, p. 66.

Horizontal range. Is found on passage in districts Tia
and III., and occurs in winter in district IV.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in districts 1 and 2.

Under the name of Motacilla alba, 8. dukhunensis, Dr.

Severizoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan.’ 177

Severtzoff also (pp. 66, 189) gives the following particulars
as to range, viz. :—

Horizontal range. Breeds in district I., and occurs on pas-
sage in districts II. and III.

Vertical range. Breeds and occurs on passage in districts 1
and 2, breeds in district 3, and is met with on passage in dis-
tricts 4 and 5.

195. Moracitya Personata, Gould; Severtzoff, pp. 66, 139.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I., II., I1I., com-
monly in the two latter; and breeds and is common in winter
in district IV.

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1, 2, and 3, rarely in
district 1, and commonly in district 2.

I possess a specimen from Turkestan labelled by Dr. Severt-
zoft M. personata, which differs from European examples of
M. alba merely in having more white on the wings, especially
on the coverts, and less white on the sides of the head, this
colour being there restricted to the forehead and a space round
and, to a slight extent, behind the eye.

195.8. MoraciLLA MADERASPATANA, Gmel.

Motacilla maderaspatensis, Severtzoft, pp. 66, 189.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts II. and III.

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1 and 2, rarely in the
former.

195y. Moraciiia saponica, Swinh. (M. lugens, Temm. nec
Illig.).

Motacilla personata, y. melanota, Severtzoff, pp. 67, 139.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts III. and IV.

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 2 and 3.

Specimens in my collection obtained by Dr. Severtzoff agree
closely with examples from Japan.

196, MoracinLa MELANOPE, Pall.

Motacilla sulphurea, Severtzoff, p. 67.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I., [1., I1I., and IV.,
and is found rarely in winter in district IIT.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in districts 1 and 2,

Mr. H. E. Dresser’s Notes on

breeds in districts 3 and 4, and occurs rarely-in winter in
district 2.

197. Moracitia Fuava, L.

Budytes flava, Severtzoff, p. 67.

Horizontal range. Is common on passage in districts I., I1.,
and IIT., and is found on passage, and rarely in the breeding-
season, in district IV.

Vertical range. Is common on passage in districts 1 and 2.

197a. Moracitia virniprs, Scop.

Budytes flava, 8. cinereocapilla, Severtzoff, p. 67.

Horizontal range. Occurs on passage in all four districts,
and but rarely in the first three.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in district 2.

198. MoraciILLA MELANOCEPHALA, Licht.

Budytes melanocephala, Severtzoff, p. 67.

Horizontal range. Breeds in all four districts.

Vertical range. Breeds commonly in districts 1 and 2, ae
possibly in 3.

199. Moracriia RAtI, Bp.

Budytes rayi, var. flavifrons, Severtzoff, p. 67.

Horizontal range. Rare on passage in district III., is ‘found
on passage and breeds rarely in district ‘IV.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in district 2.

200. Moracinua CITREOLA, Pall.
Budytes citreola, Severtzoff, pp. 67, 139.
Horizontal range. Occurs on passage in districts II., III.,

and IV. |
Vertical range. Occurs on passage in districts 1 and 2.

200 a. MoracinLa CITREOLOIDES, Hodgs.

Budytes citreola, var. melanota, Severtzoff, pp. 67, 139.

Horizontal range. Breeds and occurs on passage in dis-
tricts IT. and III.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in district 2, and breeds

in districts 8 and 4.

201. ANTHUS CAMPESTRIS, Severtzoff, pp. 67, 141.
Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I., II., and III.

ret:

Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan,’ 179

Vertical range. Breeds im districts °2 and 3, and occurs on
passage in the former.

Severtzoff includes also two subspecies of this species which,
so far as I can judge from a large series of Tawny Pipits I
have examined, I should not consider to be specifically sepa-
rable from true A. campestris. The first of these he calls

Anthus campestris, B. orientalis, Brehm.

Horizontal range. Breeds in all four districts.

Vertical range. Breeds in district 3.

_ This form, he says (p. 141), has long legs, small hind claws,
is greyish brown above, and has light yellowish brown mark-
ings on the outer rectrices. The second so-called subspecies,
of which he gives no description, is called

Anthus campestris, y. brachycentrus, Heugl.

Range. Similar to that of the preceding subspecies, but it
breeds also in district 2.

202. ANTHUS TRIVIALIS, L.

Anthus arboreus, Severtzoff, pp. 67, 1389.

Horizontal range. Breeds and occurs on passage in.all four
districts, but rarely in the first three.

Vertical range. Occurs rarely on passage in district 1, and
commonly in district 2; breeds rarely in districts 3 and 4.

202a. ANTHUS PRATENSIS, Severtzoff, pp. 67, 139.

Horizontal range. Occurs on passage in all four districts,
and in winter in district IV.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in Taye 1 and 2.

At page 139 Severtzoff goes into detail to show that there
are in Turkestan intermediate forms between the Tree-Pipit
and Meadow-Pipit, which he consequently treats as being two
forms of the same species. These notes I need not reproduce ;
but it may be well to insert the following MS. note written
for me by Dr. Severtzoff, viz. :—‘‘I can only consider that
the Tree-Pipit and the Meadow-Pipit are locally specifically
distinct; for in Turkestan there are several intermediate forms,
which I term varieties, as they run into each other, and the
differences are not specific. These varieties are :—

“ Anthus intermedius, Severtzoff, which has the hind claw

Mr. H. E. Dresser’s Notes on

of varying length, and the typical long slender bill of Anthus
pratensis.

“ Anthus microrhynchus, which has the hinder claw as in
Anthus trivialis, the beak stout, as in A. pratensis, but shorter;
in shape it is like that of A. trivialis, but 1s considerably
smaller. -

“ Anthus trivialis is distinguishable from A. pratensis not
only by the hind claw, but in having a stouter bill, though
about equal in length. The true Meadow-Pipit is only seen
in Turkestan on passage, and is scarce; but the two forms
A. intermedius and A. microrhynchus are those which breed
commonly in the mountains, on grassy places, where a few
bushes are scattered about, at from 5000 to 9000 feet alti-
tude. Typical A. trivialis also breeds at similar altitudes, or
even higher, say from 7000 to 9000 feet, but is rare. The
form known as Anthus agilis, Sykes, was also found in 1874.
in the mountains east of Kuldja.”

I cannot help surmising that, amongst the so-called inter-
mediate forms between the Meadow- and Tree-Pipits, Dr.
Severtzoff must have obtained the species which breeds in the

Petchora district, in North Russia, and which I have lately
described in the ‘ Birds of Europe’ under the name of Anthus
seebohmi; for this bird has the long hind claw of Anthus pra-
tensis, and the wing-formula and general coloration of the
upper parts are as in A. trivialis ; but one good characteristic
is that it always has the outer rectrices marked with smoke-
grey, and not with white.

203. ANTHUS CERVINUS, Pall.

Anthus cervinus, var. rufogularis, Severtzoff, pp. 67, 140.
Horizontal range. Rare on passage in district III.
Vertical range. Rare on passage in district 2.

204. ANTHUS SPINOLETTA, L.

Anthus aquaticus, Severtzofi, p. 67.

Horizontal range. Breeds and occurs in winter in all four
districts ; but itis somewhat uncertain as to whether it really
breeds in the last.

Vertical range. Rare in winter in district 1, and common
at the same season in district 2; breeds in district 4.

Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan, 181

205. Orocorys ALPESTRIS, Severtzoff, p. 67.
Horizontal range. Rare during winter in district III.
Vertical range. Rare during winter in district 1.

206. Besides the common Shore-Lark, Severtzoff (p. 67)
only includes-one other species under the name of Otocorys
albigula ; but he now informs me that under this name he has
included the following, viz. :—

1. Orocorys BRANDTI, Dresser, B. of Eur. pt. xxxiu. Oct.
1874.

Horizontal range. Resident in district III.

Vertical range. Resident in district 1.

2. Orocokys LONGIRosTRIS, Gould.
Horizontal range. Breeds, and occurs also in the winter-
season, in districts I. and II.

Vertical range. Breeds and occurs in winter in districts 4
and 5.

3. Orocorys PENICILLATA, Gould.
Horizontal range. Resident in district III.
Vertical range. Resident in district 38.

207. ALAUDA ARVENSIS, L. ; Severtzoff, p. 67.

Horizontal range. Occurs on passage in all four districts,
and is very rarely found breeding or in the winter.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in all five districts, and
very rarely breeds in districts 3, 4, and 5.

208. ALaupA GuLGuULA, Frankl.

Alauda inconspicua (A. cantarella, Bp. ?), Severtzoff, pp. 67,
142.

Horizontal range. Breeds in district III.

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1, 2, and 3.

Dr. Severtzoff gives (p. 142) detailed description and mea-
surements of this species, which I do not reproduce, as he
now informs me that he has identified it with Alauda gulgula ;
but he adds a MS. note as follows :—‘“ Alauda cantarella,
Bp.,= Alauda intermedia, Swinh.,= A. triborhyncha, Hodgs.,
also breeds in Turkestan, and ranges N.W. to the. Ural
river.”

182 Mr. H. E. Dresser’s Notes on

209. GaLERITA CRISTATA, L.

Alauda cristata, Severtzoff, p. 67.

Horizontal range. Resident in all four districts.

Vertical range. Resident in districts 1 and 2; breeds in
district 3.

210. CALANDRELLA BRACHYDACTYLA (Leisl.), Severtzoff, pp.
67, 141, 142. |

Horizontal range. Breeds in all four districts.

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1, 2, 3, and 4, commonly
in ] and 2; and occurs on passage in district 4.

At page 142 he writes as follows :—‘‘ Calandrella brachy-
dactyla during summer inhabits districts around those inha-
bited by C. leucophea on the west, north, and east, and ranges
from the Thian-shan to the steppes of the Syr Darja, Chuish,
and Ilish, where, however, in the winter it is replaced by C.
leucophea.’ Asasubspecies he further includes a bird under
the name of

Calandrella brachydactyla, B. tenuirostris, at p. 67

(Horizontal range. Breeds in district IV.

Vertical range. Breeds in district 2),
but gives no characters by which it may be distinguished.

385. CALANDRELLA PISPOLETTA, Cab. nec Pall.; Severtzoff,
p- 67. |

Horizontal range. Breeds in district 1V.

Vertical range. Breeds in district 1.

211. CaALANDRELLA LEUCOPH#A, Severtzoff, pp. 67, 142, 143.

Horizontal range. Breeds and is resident in district I1I.,
being, however, numerically scarce.

Vertical range. Breeds and is resident in district 1.

Of this species a careful description is given at page 142;
but I cannot describe it better thau by calling it a pale desert
form of Calandrella pispoletia, the species which occurs on
the Volga. The measurements are given as follows :—Total
length 7", extent 11’ 6", wing 3! 8", tail 2” 7", tarsus 72!
middle toe 43, hind toe 3”, hind claw 44!, culmen 332",
thickness of the bill 2”. He further states that it is found in
the Syr Darja district, but is not very common, being met

Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan.’ 183

with only on passage ; for it breeds further north and east in
the naked steppes. He met with it on the Lower Emba
and Irgisa, in Caracuma, on the northern and western coasts
of Lake Aral, on the Ust-Urta, and further south on the
eastern shores of the Caspian. When the young are fledged
it leads a roving life, but does not range westward as far as
the Ural; and ina MS. footnote he adds that in 1874 he found
it breeding sporadically in open places iu the saxaul-region
between the Oxus and the Jaxartes.

212. MELANocoRyPHA caLANnpRA (L.) ; Severtzoff, pp. 67,
143.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I., II., III., and IV.,
commonly in all but the last, and occurs rarely in the winter.

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1 and 2, rarely in 1, and
commonly in 2.

213. MenanocorypHa BIMACULATA (Ménétr.) ; Severtzoff,
pp. 67, 148.

Horizontal range. Similar to that of the preceding species.

Vertical range. Breeds commonly in district 2.

Severtzoff also includes, at page 67, under the name of M.
bimaculata, 8. minor, without description, a subspecies, the
range of which is similar to that of M. dimaculata.

214. MErLANOCORYPHA SIBERICA, Gm.

Melanocorypha leucoptera, Severtzoff, p. 67.

Horizontal range. Occurs on passage and in winter in dis-
tricts I., 1I., and ITI.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage and in winter in dis-
tricts 1 and 2.

215. MErLaNocoRYPHA YELTONENSIS, Forst.

Melanocorypha tartarica, Severtzoff, p. 67.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I., II., and ITI.

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1 and 2, commonly in
the former.

216. ? Lantus excusitor, Severtzoff, p. 67.
Horizontal range. Occurs on passage and in winter in dis-
tricts I., I., and III.

Mr. H. E. Dresser’s Notes on

Vertical range. Occurs on passage and in winter in dis-
tricts 1 and 2.

Dr. Severtzoff now informs me that the species he included
under the name of Lanius excubitor is not that bird, as the
true L.-excubitor does not occur in Turkestan ; but he has not
determined which species it really is, and I am therefore com-
pelled to give it, and Nos. 217-220, under the titles used by
him. I may, however, add that he informed me that his
Lanius leucopterus (No. 217) is, he believes, identical with
Lanius homeyeri, Cab.

217. LANnius LEUCOPTERUS, Severtzoff, p. 67.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I. and II., and occurs
on passage in districts I., II., and III.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in regions 1, 2, and 5,
and possibly breeds in district 4.

218. Lantus Masor, Pall.; Severtzoff, p. 67.

Horizontal range. Is found on passage and in winter in
district I., but is rare.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in district 2, winters in
districts 2 and 8, and possibly breeds in district 4.

219. Lanius LEucopyeus, Hempr.; Severtzoff, p. 67.

Horizontal range. Breeds rarely in district IIT.

Vertical range. Breeds in district 1, and is found on fpas-
sage in district 2; rare in both.

220. LANIUS PALLIDIROSTRIS, Cass. ; Severtzoff, p. 67.
Horizontal range. Breeds rarely in district III.
Vertical range. Breeds rarely in district 1.

221. Lantus scnacn, Gmel. (erythronotus, Gould) ; Se-
vertzoff, p. 67.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts II., III., and IV.

Vertical range. Breeds in district 1 and 2.

222. Lanius Minor, Severtzoff, p. 67.

Horizontal range. Breeds in all four districts, commonly in
I, I1., and III.

Vertical range. Breeds rarely in district 1, and commonly
in districts 2 and 3.

Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan,’ 185

223. Lanius cotturio (L.) ; Severtzoff, p. 67.
Horizontal range. Breeds in districts ITI. and IV.
Vertical range. Breeds in districts 2 and 3.

224, ? Lanius pHa@nicurvs, Pall.; Severtzoff, pp. 67, 144.

Horizontal range. Breeds in all four districts, commonly in
the first three.

Vertical range. Breeds commouly in districts 1, 2, and 3.

225. LANIUS ISABELLINUS, Ehr. ; Severtzoff, pp. 67, 144.

Horizontal range. Breeds commonly in districts III. and
IV.

Vertical range. Breeds commonly in district 1, and occurs
on passage in district 2.

Respecting the two preceding species, Nos, 224 and 225,
Dr. Severtzoff gives a long note (p. 144), of which it may be
advisable to give a detailed translation as follows :—

“In Turkestan there are three forms of Lanius phenicurus,
the first of which inhabits the mountains (var. montana*), the
second the lowlands (var. caniceps) ; and the third, the steppe-
form, which differs constantly, though slightly, and may be
considered a distinct species, is L. isabellinus. On examining
a considerable series, I did not find any specimens inter-
mediate between L. phenicurus and L. isabellinus.

“TL. isabellinus is larger than L. phenicurus; the tail is
rounded, the four central rectrices alone being of equal length,
and the rest are graduated so that the outer ones are 4! to
5! shorter than the central ones; the 1st quill is short, being
once and a half as long as the coverts, 4=3>5>2>6,
or 4>3>5>6>2. ;

* Adult male in spring. Crown, nape, and two thirds of the
back and shoulders same colour; lores, lower part of the
cheeks, and a line above the eye brownish white, and on the
upper part of the cheek there is a black line; rump and tail
light brown; underparts light brownish, with a yellowish |.
tinge, in old birds with a rose tinge, which is most apparent
on the sides; throat and breast sometimes pure white; quills
dark greyish brown, with pale yellowish grey margins, the

* Ste.—H. E. D.
SER, III.—VOL. III. | Oo

186 Mr. H. E. Dresser’s Notes on

three inner secondaries lighter brownish grey; the base of
the 5th to the 8th primaries white, forming a white patch,
which is sometimes concealed by the coverts.

“ Adult female. Differs from the male merely in having the
black line on the side of the head shorter, this line being sur-
rounded by white feathers.

«The young of both sexes are varied with brown and greyish
spots and lines; the larger wing-coverts and the inner secon-
daries have broad light edges ; there is no white patch on the
wing; and the underparts are barred with brown, the barrings
being narrower and wider apart than those on the upper
parts; the dark markings on the cheeks are not black, but
brownish, the feathers having black edges; tail light brown-
ish, barred with brown ; rump light reddish brown.

« After the first moult the crown, nape, and back are as in
the adult, the wings, tail, and cheeks as in the younger bird ;
the lower throat and sides are marked as in the very young

bird, but the throat and centre of the abdomen as in the.
adult. The male has the barrings on the abdomen narrower

in this plumage than the female After the third moult the
male gets his full plumage,—but the female not until after the
fourth moult, as after the third moult the sides are still marked
as in the young; but it breeds in this dress.’

“Tn all plumages the legs are blackish plumbeous ; the bill
is black in the adult, and yellowish grey at the base and brown
at the tip in the young. Total length 8-8! 5!" extent 11" 1!"'—
12", wing 8” 5!—3! 8!" tail 3” 14!"-3!" 24", culmen 54", thick-
ness of bill 24!", tarsus 9!"-94""", middle toe 63".

In Lanius phenicurus the ten central tail-feathers are uni-
form in length, the two outer ones being 4!” shorter ; the alar
patch is larger, and extends over nine primaries, from the
2nd to the 10th, and is not concealed by the coverts; the
upper parts are darker and greyer (brownish grey) ; the wings

are blackish brown, the feathers having light edges; tail red- |

dish brown; lores black, like the upper part of the cheeks ;
underparts light rose-coloured; sides brownish. The dif-
ferences in plumage are similar to those in ZL. isabellinus.
First primary short, longer than the coverts, 3=4>5>2>6,
or 3rd longest, 2=5. Length of the male 7” 5!, extent

ee ne ee ee ee ee

i ee a ae ee ee

Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan.’ 187

10" 8", wing 3" 5!", tail 3"; length of the female 8" 1", ex-
tent 11” 4", wing 3” 73", tail 8! 2": but these differences in
size are not constant.

“ The mountain form of L. phenicurus (var. ruficeps*) differs
in being darker in colour; the back and scapulars in fresh
plumage are pure brown slightly shaded with grey ; but in
spring these parts are greyer; the head is always brownish
mixed with red, almost as rufous as the tail, which, with the
rump, is dark reddish brown, with a chestnut tinge in fresh
plumage. The lowland form (var. caniceps) has the upper
parts greyer, being grey tinged with brown, being purer grey
in the males and young birds ; head similarly coloured ; wings,
tail, and underparts as in the mountain form. The mountain
form inhabits chiefly the wooded portions of the Thian-shan to
an altitude of from 7000 to 8000 feet; and the lowland form
occurs in the bushes and thorn-thickets near Syr Darja, Mi,
and Lepsa, below 1000 feet. In the cultivated districts both
forms are found in gardens, and intermediate specimens may
befound. As regards L. isabellinus, numbers were obtained on
passage in spring in Chimkent and Tashkend, between the
20th February and the 20-25th March; but in the autumn it
was not observed there, though it was seen in Aulje-ata early
in September. It breeds in the steppes near Balchash, Chu,
and Talass.

““ Neither of the two forms of L. phenicurus arrives in Tash-
kend and Chimkent before the early part of April.”

In a MS. footnote he adds that the species he includes as
L. phenicurus should stand as L. phenicurotdes, Severtz.

226. ORIOLUS GALBULA, L.; Severtzoff, p. 67.

Horizontal range. Breeds commonly in all four districts.

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1, 2, and 3.

In a MS. note Severtzoff adds that Oriolus kundoo, Sykes,
also occurs in Turkestan, as he has lately discovered by an
examination of his specimens of Orioles obtained there. The
range of this species is as follows :—

Horizontal runge. Breeds in districts II., I1J., and IV.

Vertical range.. Breeds in districts 2 and 3.

* Sic.—H. E. D.
02

188 _ Mr. H. E. Dresser’s Notes on

227. AMPELIS GARRULUS, L.

Bombycilla garrula, Severtzoff, p. 67.

Horizontal range. Rare in winter in districts I., H., and
2b ks

Vertical range. Rare in winter in districts 2 and 3.

228. Tscurrrea PARADISI, L.
-Muscipeta castanea (Temm.) ; Severtzoff, p. 67.
Horizontal range. Breeds and occurs on passage in districts
I. and III.
Vertical range. Occurs on passage in district 2, and breeds
in district 3.

229. Muscicapa eRisota (L.); Severtzoff, p. 67.
Horizontal range. Occurs on passage in all four districts,
and breeds in districts I., II., and III.
Vertical range. Occurs on passage in districts 1 and 2, com-
monly in the latter, and breeds in district 3.

230. Muscicara parva, Bechst.; Severtzoff, p. 67.
Horizontal range. Is rare on passage in districts III. and

IV.
Vertical range. Occurs rarely on passage in district 2.

231. Hrrunpo rustica, L.

Hirundo domestica, Severtzoff, p. 67.

Horizontal range. Breeds in all four districts, commonly in
the first three.

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1 and 2.

232. Hirunvo ruruta, Temm.

Hirundo alpestris, Severtzoff, p. 67.

Horizontal range. Breeds in all four districts.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in district 2, and breeds
in district 3.

233. CHELIDON LAGoPopA, Pall.

Hirundo lagopoda, Severtzoff, p. 67.

Horizontal range. Occurs on passage in all four districts.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in districts 2 and 3, and
possibly breeds in the latter.

Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan, 189

234, Coryre riparia (L.) ; Severtzoff, p. 67.

Horizontal range. Occurs on passage in districts I., III,
and IV., and breeds in the two latter.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage and breeds in districts
1 and 2.

235. CoTyLE RUPESTRIS, Scop.; Severtzoff, p. 67.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts II., III., and IV.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in district 2, and breeds
in districts 38 and 4, rarely in the latter.

236. CypsELus apus, L.

Cypselus murarius, Severtzoff, p. 67.

Horizontal range. Occurs commonly on passage, and breeds
rarely, in all four districts.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in districts 1 and 2, and
breeds rarely in districts 3.and 4.

237. ? CYPSELUS AFFINIS, Gray ; Severtzoff, p. 57.
Horizontal range. Possibly breeds in district IV.
Vertical range. Possibly breeds in district 3.

238. CYPSELUS MELBA (L.) ; Severtzoff, pp. 67, 145.

Horizontal range. Breeds sporadically in districts III. and
IN.

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 2 and 3.

At page 145 he writes as follows :—“‘ The sporadic occur-
rence of Cypselus melba is somewhat remarkable. I only ob-
tained one specimen in Karatau, on some rocks, and met with
it again about 300 versts to the south, in a small rocky chain
called Mogot-tau, near Chodjent; but it has not been observed
between these two places, nor east of Karatau. Mr. Fed-
chanko, however, observed it in 1869 in Samarcand. It
breeds numerously near Boroldai, and a few pairs near Chod-
jent, as alsoinSamarcand. Specimens from Turkestan agree
closely with European examples.”

239. CAPRIMULGUS PALLENS, Sev.
Caprimulgus europeus, var. pallens, Severtzoff, pp. 67, 145.
Horizontal range. Breeds in all four districts.

190 Notes on Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan,’

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1, 2, and 3, rarely in
the first. | |

In a MS. note at page 145, Dr. Severtzoff writes as fol-
lows :—-“‘ My C. pallens is a somewhat doubtful species, and
may prove identical with a Chinese specimen in the Paris
Museum labelled Caprimulgus stictomus, but which Mr. Swin-
hoe considers to be merely a pale specimen of C. monticola,
and says that the true C. stictomus is confined to Formosa, and
does not occur on the mainland of Asia. I have taken an
accurate description of the Paris bird to compare with my
specimen, which is in Russia. The pale form of C. europeus,
from the Ural river, is not intermediate between C. ewropeus
and my C. pallens. This pale form I have found breeding
on the east side of Lake Aral, and near the Lower Oxus, where
the bird runs rather smaller than in Europe, but in coloration
it is identical with Ural examples. It would be well to com-
pare these with C. indicus, Lath., and C. mahrattensis, Sykes,
as the matter requires further investigation.”

240. CAPRIMULGUS ARENICOLOR, Severtzoff, Ibis, 1875, p.
491. )

Caprimulgus isabellinus, Temm.; Severtzoff, p. 68.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts III. and IV., rarely
in the former. :

Vertical range. Breeds in district 1.

A careful description of this species is given in ‘ The Ibis’
(l.c.) by Dr. Severtzoff, who, in a MS. note, gives me the
following particulars :—‘‘ There is no constant difference in
colour between the young and old birds; but the former are
recognizable by their laxer plumage on the body. ‘This lax
plumage is moulted in July, soon after the young leave the

nest, and when they are in family parties with their parents ;
and, judging from these parties, two or three young are reared
from each nest. About the end of August these family parties
break up; and then the young have lost the immature plumage,
except as regards the under tail-coverts. After leaving their
parents they are found in pairs ; and the old birds leave the
Lower Oxus about the first half of September, the young re-
maining till the end of that month, and some few until the

—“eee

Birds of the Lydenburg District. 191

middle of October. I met with the present species near the
Lower Oxus, and in the undulating thinly bush-covered sand-
wastes, as also in the densely bush-covered alluvial marly-
clay country, never very far from water, round which they
fly after sunset. On the Lower Syr (Jaxartes) it was rarer ;
and here I first noticed it,—and received specimens also from
Krasnovodsk, on the east coast of the Caspian.”
[To be continued. |

XIX.— Ornithological Notes made during Trips between Bloem-
fontein and the Lydenburg Gold-fields. By ¥. A. Barratt.

(Plate IV.)

On my first journey I started from Kingwilliamstown in the
Cape colony, having well stocked my light waggon with
all the ammunition and apparatus necessary for collecting,
not forgetting my “ Layard ;” but I did not keep any parti-
cular record of the birds obtained in the district, and I pro-
pose to treat in the present paper only of the birds observed
in the northern part of the Orange Free State, from Bloem-
fontein onwards; my notes made during sundry expeditions
in the Transvaal Republic will also be embodied.

Leaving the capital in the month of February, we had
scarcely proceeded two or three miles, when we came upon
about a dozen Stanley Cranes (Anthropoides stanleyanus)
sporting and dancing; to their considerable astonishment I
dropped a bullet among them, which made them stalk off
majestically, shaking their beautiful long plumes as they went.
About four miles further on we came to Rhinoceros Spruit,
where large numbers of Coursers were gliding, as it were,
in and out of the stunted herbage; whilst Plovers (Hoplopterus
coronatus) were wheeling about in every direction, uttering
their harsh cries. Thence we went to the Modder river;
and in the vleys running parallel with the stream were to be
seen the pretty Weaverbirds (Huplectes taha) bobbing up and
down like a golden ball, and Chera progne with its gracefully
sweeping tail. It was in the bush near the above-named river

that I first shot the Great Spotted Cuckoo (Coccystes glan-

oy *

192 Mr. F. A. Barratt’s Notes on the Birds

darius) in November 1874, A short distance from this I
found some Francolins (F. afer) near the foot of the moun-
tains, and from the long grass my dog started a few Quail.
Proceeding towards Sandy’s River, leaving Wynberg a few
miles to the right, we met with many water-birds, such as
Wild Geese, Duck, Coots, Moorhens, and Grebes, started
out of the vleys and ditches, whilst in the long waving grass
the cackling noise of the “ Scolding Cock” (Eupodotis afra)
often startled us as it flew up suddenly from under our feet,
the more wary E. scolopacea only allowing us to approach it
in circles. Ten miles or so to the north of Sandy’s River
the route lay through a lonely glen threaded by a sparkling
stream, in which could be detected large fish of all shades
of colour, rolling over in the deepest pools: here it was that
I first saw the Night-Heron and the Great African King-
fisher, the latter falling to my gun. This glen is a: fa-
vourite collecting-ground of mine; and I have at different
times procured Guinea-fowl, Golden Cuckoos, many species
of Hawks (notably Melieraxv niger), and the Spotted Eagle-
Owl (Bubo maculosus). I also found Huplectes capensis and
E. oryx breeding in considerable numbers in the reeds on an
adjoming farm, where also many of the smaller Warblers
were abundant. A few miles further on some mountains are
reached; and here, hopping about among the stones, were
Thrushes and Stonechats. The mountainous country is fol-
lowed by a large flat, varied by a few slight undulations, after
which the village of Kronstadt is reached. About ten miles
from this I saw for the first time the Crowned Crane (Ba-
learica regulorum) in a wild state; nor have I ever observed

them south of this point. Ona“ spruit” about twenty miles —

distant, I came across some Spoonbills and sundry Herons
(Ardea cinerea), which I afterwards found were in the habit
of building in a willow tree from year to year. Hence onward
to Rhinoster Kop, where formerly wild dogs abounded, and
where the cry of the Jackal is frequently heard: many Shrikes
and Doves formed the conspicuous ornithological feature of
this place; but perhaps the non-observance of other species
was due to my short stay there. We now come to another
flat, much the same style of country as the others, where

CNS RT

IEEE Oa Pg Oe

=<?
——

“ae le ee AF 24 ,

ongip*
tig
*) abe

of the Lydenburg District. 193

we see the Secretary-bird stalking about, until we arrive at
Rhinoceros River. Here are to be found more Guinea-fowl
in the Mimosa thorn trees, the Hoopoe (Upupa minor), a few
Woodpeckers, many of the Puff-backed Shrikes, Martins, &c.
Hence we proceed to the Vaal river, where Ardea goliath is
to be met with ; and from this place to about ten miles north
of Potchefstroom you get a great variety of Egrets and Herons,
which birds are my especial favourites. Ofthis family I have
seen and shot in the above district Ardea egretia (one of the
most lovely, if not, indeed, the lovliest of all the Egrets of
South Africa), A. cinerea, A. atricollis, A. purpurea, A. bu-
bulcus, A. garzetta, A. leucoptera, Ardetta minuta, Botaurus
stellaris, Nycticoragr griseus, as well as Spoonbills, Storks, and
Pelicans ; so that it will be seen that the locality is a good one
for water-birds. At about thirty miles north of Potchef-
stroom the Mooi river takes its rise, followed, more or less, by
an open country; and then we get what im the colony are
called Kops, or Rants, with quantities of sugar-bush, on
which we found several kinds of Sun-birds. Our way then
lay to Pretoria, thence to Nazareth, and afterwards to Ly-
denburg, the country being similar all the way. Near the
latter place, however, we get a partially wooded and moun-
tainous country ; and as we draw nearer the chain of the Dra- _
kenberg the scenery increases in wildness and grandeur ;
here, in the deep kloofs, the loud note of Corythaix muscphaga —
was heard. At the base of these mountains, in the neigh-
bourhood of the Macamac goldfields, I found the country to
be very rich in birds, and many species hitherto supposed to
be peculiar to Natal occurred tous. Most of the rarer species,
including the new Bradypterus, were obtained in this district.
I must add that the neighbourhood of Rustenberg I have
since found to be a favourite resort for many of the migratory
European birds.

I need hardly mention a fact that I fear will be only too
painfully apparent from a perusal of this paper—that I can
lay no claim to a scientific knowledge of ornithology ; the
few notes here put together have been written at the request
of Mr. Bowdler Sharpe, who has named my collection for

Mr. F. A. Barratt’s Notes on the Birds

194

me; and by his advice I have applied myself on the present
occasion to the distribution of the birds through the different
districts traversed by me. I hope to revisit the Macamac
Gold-fields ; and I shall then pay even greater attention to the
birds, now that I am aware of the interest that attaches to
them. The collection which I brought to England is a very
small one compared with that which the government of the
Orange Free State took from me as a contribution to the
forthcoming Philadelphia Exhibition.

The nomenclature employed is that of Mr. Sharpe’ s edi-
tion of Layard’s ‘ Birds of South Africa,’ his ‘ Catalogue of
African Birds,’ and of the first edition of Layard’s ‘ Birds of
South Africa.’

1. OroGyPs AURICULARIS.
I killed a fine female specimen of this Vulture with a bullet
from behind a rock, in the Orange Free State; it had the ear-
lappets well developed, as have all the specimens which I have
noticed in South Africa. According to my experience they
do not associate with the other Vultures, but keep aloof, and
remain in pairs; or a single bird may sometimes be seen on a
tree or rock.
I kept one in confinement, which became exceedingly tame ;
and it was always able to hold its own against a tame baboon
which I kept in the same yard.

2. SERPENTARIUS SECRETARIUS.
I have seen this bird near Lydenburg, Rustenberg, and
sparingly throughout my travels in the Transvaal and Free
State. They are preserved in both places; and a heavy fine is
inflicted on any person found out by the authorities to have
shot one. The Secretary stalks about very majestically, and
now and then makes a pounce upon something, which he
swallows at once. I had two tame ones at my farm at Cha-
lumna, British Kaffraria, which used to run about the garden ;
but they were very weak on their legs. In attacking a snake
they would shade (or, rather, cover) the tibia with the wing,
and then strike with the lower part of the tarsus and foot ;
when the snake was stunned it would be seized by the back

of the Lydenburg District. 195

of the neck in the bird’s strong beak, the foot still remaining
firm, and then swallowed. My two birds were very stupid: one
was killed by being squeezed to death by a pig; and the other
had its leg broken by a waggon. Their note is very similar
to that of the young Stanley Crane. The eggs, which are two
in number, are of a dull white, dotted with light brown at
the obtuse ends.

3. CIRCUS PYGARGUS.
I received this bird from the district of Lydenburg. I have
never, to my knowledge, seen them in any quantity.

4. CIRCUS MACRURUS.

This I also received from near Lydenburg, where they fre-
quent the swampy ground, and, I am informed, feed on small
quadrupeds, snakes, &c.

5. ME Lirrax GABAR.

Two specimens were sent to me from Marico; and I have
seen the species near Potchefstroom. My man brought me
one from near Pretoria, which he said he had shot while it
was in the act of whistling. I shot two young birds off a
nest near the Modder river. On examining the nest I found
it to contain the limbs of a species of lizard, of a field-mouse,
and various bones of little animals which I could not de-
termine.

6. ASTUR POLYZONOIDES.

I shot one of these on a bush near the Vaal, and another
between Potchefstroom and Rustenberg. I also received one
specimen from near Marico.

7. BurEo JACKAL.

The well-known shrill note of this species is to be heard at
almost any time. It is a heavy-flying bird, but rather diffi-
cult to kill, being well feathered. Ishot one near Bloemfon-
tein, on our farm, where, I was told, it had been for some
time. I have observed it near the Drakenberg mountains ;
and I received a specimen from Lydenburg. The latter is
smaller than the ordinary Buzzard of the Colony. |

196 Mr. F. A. Barratt’s Notes on the Birds

8. MiLvus KORSCHUN.

I first observed this bird near Kronstadt, but I did not
manage to shoot it. I have since procured it in Potchef-
stroom district, also near Rustenberg. I think I have seen
it catching locusts with its feet ; but the locusts were so thick
that I could not observe the fact with certainty.

9. ELANUS CHRULEUS.

Procured one near Rustenberg. It attracted my attention
by a harsh cry, high in the air, which I thought to be that
of an Eagle; but, to my surprise, I found it proceeded from
this bird.

10. CERCHNEIS TINNUNCULOIDES.

I procured this bird near Rustenberg, also in the district
of Potchefstroom. They feed on locusts; and after feeding,
they will sit on a high tree, occasionally cleaning themselves,
in sleepy repose.

11. CeRcHNEIS RUPICOLOIDES.

This Kestrel appears to me to be the commonest one in
the Transvaal. J have shot it in the Lydenburg district, near
Pretoria, Potchefstroom, Rustenberg, and on my journey from
Bloemfontein to Potchefstroom. One day I had shot a Black
-Knorhaan, which skulked away in the grass; and on turning
my head I perceived a Kestrel (C. rupicoloides) hovering
within a few yards of the place. Hecamedown, and a battle
ensued; I, being anxious, ran to procure my bird, when the
Kestrel flew off to a neighbouring bush; and while I turned
to look at him the Knorhaan had gone. As I had not time
_to search for him I conclude the Kestrel had a good meal.
They appear to be gregarious, as I have often counted nine
or ten of them on one tree.

12. BusBo MACULOSUS.

Very common in the Transvaal. I have shot and observed
it between Bloemfontein and Potchefstroom, between the
latter place and Rustenberg, and near Pretoria. The cracking
noise they constantly make with their bill, more especially
when wounded, at once distinguishes them from most of the

Bile ger
ms

of the Lydenburg District. 197

other South-African Owls. I have obtained them near Pot-
chefstroom during the greater part of the year; and I pro-
cured the last one in the month of June, near Bloemfontein.
I should say they are partially gregarious, as I have often
seen a number together, perched in willow trees, on the points
of rocks and old trees.

13. SYRNIUM WOODFORDI.

I obtained one of this species at Potchefstroom, and I have
seen another from near that place. I shot my specimen to-
wards evening, when it was flying about, no doubt, in pur-
suit of its prey.

14, CaPRIMULGUS EUROPAUS.

I have often observed these birds flitting about at dusk; and
they will sometimes settle on the ground and there remain
till you have passed. I shot specimens near Kronstadt and
Potchefstroom, have observed them near Rustenberg, and
have also received one from Marico.

15. CYPsELUS CAFFER.
I shot these birds as they were in the act of appropriating
a Martin’s nest in Potchefstroom.

16. MrERops SUPERCILIOSUS.

I noticed many of these birds near the mouth of the Mooi,
at the junction of that river with the Vaal, generally close to
the banks. I also received specimens of the species from

Marico.

17. MrERopPs BULLOCKOIDES.

I saw a great quantity of these birds at Olifants Nek, near
Rustenberg ; and I have seen a few near Potchefstroom. I
shot several in January 1875, which seemed to be in very
imperfect plumage, as 1 only got one in good feather. They
will sit motionless on a mimosa thorn-bush, only flying off
occasionally to catch an insect. On the approach of an in-
truder they will erect their tails, give a squeak, and flit off
to another bush.

18. MeRopPs PUSILLUS.

Found this species in January 1875 near Rustenberg. They
are rather more shy than M. bullockoides, and are not so plen-

198 Mr. F. A. Barratt’s Notes on the Birds

tiful; I have never seen more than a pair together. I met
with one or two near Pretoria.

19. CoRAcIAS GARRULA.

T found this Roller in the same localities as C. caudata ; and
it appears to be similar in its habits to that bird, but is not
so shy and is easier to approach. I have often observed them
sitting motionless on the dead branch of a tree.

20. CoraciAs CAUDATA.

I obtained this bird near Rustenberg and on the Vaal river,
and have also received it from Marico, about twenty miles
north of Pretoria. The first specimen I shot was flying from
tree to tree, uttering a harsh note, and throwing its head about
in perfect confidence. On my wounding it and attempting
to pick it up, it screamed and furiously attacked my hand.
I have often chased one for hours unsuccessfully, sometimes
having to cross water up to my waist, so shy and wary are
these birds. They generally frequent large trees near run-
ning brooks.

21. CoRYTHORNIS CYANOSTIGMA.

I have shot this lovely little bird in different eee through-
out my journey from Bloemfontein to Potchefstroom, from
the latter locality to Pretoria, and thence to Lydenburg. I
also met with it on my trip to Rustenberg, in British Kaffraria,
and over the Kei, in the Fingoe country. It does not appear
at all shy; and when I have been fishing in the Mooi river at
Potchefstroom, I have often observed it flitting past, dropping
in the water as if shot, and then rising with a small fish; or
it would sit on a reed or twig and seem to be greatly inter-
ested in my proceedings.

22. HALCYON ALBIVENTRIS.

I have shot this Kingfisher near Rustenberg ye Olifants
Nek. I noticed several of them in the thick bush near the
Megaliesberg range of mountains, and also near Pretoria.

23. Upupa AFRICANA.
I saw a great many of these birds flying about the mimosa
thorns on the Rhinoster river, between Kronstadt and Vaal

of the Lydenburg District. 199

river. I have met with a few specimens in the Colony, and
on the Modder river near Bloemfontein, Orange Free State.
I shot one on my trip from the Mooi river to Rustenberg.
They have a silent flight; and I have never observed them
on the ground.

24. IRRISOR ERYTHRORHYNCHUS.

I saw numbers of these Wood-Hoopoes at Olifants Nek,
near Rustenberg, or rather heard them; for they keep up such
an incessant chattering noise when disturbed that one is glad to
get away from them. I have also seen them in British Kaf-
fraria, Cape colony, and Olifant Hook, district Alexandria.

25. RHINOPOMASTES CYANOMELAS.

My. Lucas, a friend and fellow sportsman, brought me two
specimens of this bird from Marico, where he shot it in the
bush in January 1875.

26. CoRYTHAIX MUSOPHAGA.

I have shot this bird between the Karkama and Chalumna
rivers, in the dense bush a few miles from the coast. I have also
observed it near Lydenburg and Macamac gold-fields, where it
abounds ; but owing to its shy habits and to its concealing itself
in the thick foliage, I cannot speak much of its habits. I
did not see it near Rustenberg; but I saw many Schizorhis
concolor. |

27. ScHIZORHIS CONCOLOR.

This species is common about Rustenberg; and I have re-
ceived it from Marico. It makes such a noise that one can-
not fail to perceive its whereabouts. Dr. Exton, of Bloem-
fontein, has given such an accurate description of the bird,
that I shall not attempt to describe its habits (cf Sharpe’s
ed. Layard’s B. 8. Afr. p. 146).

28. CuCcULUS CANORUS.
_ This bird was procured at Potchefstroom in December 1874. ;
and I have received it from Marico and the Vaal river.

29. CucULUS CUPREUS.
I have shot this well-known bird on the Modder river, near
Bloemfontein. Near Kronstadt I found them in great quan-

Mr. F. A. Barratt’s Notes on the Birds

200

tities about the mimosa thorns, and their call could be heard
the whole day. I have also shot them at Rustenberg, Pot-
chefstroom, and Pretoria.

30. CoccysTES GLANDARIUS.

I shot this bird in November 1874, on the Modder river,
also near Potchefstroom. They are more shy than C. ya-
cobinus.

31. CoccysTESs JACOBINUS.
_ These birds seem to have a pretty general range ; for I found
them on the Modder and Vaal rivers, at Potchefstroom, and |
Rustenberg ; and I think I saw two in the bush near Pretoria.
I have shot them in December, January, and February. They
seem to be more common than C. glandarius and the other
Cuckoos ; at least it was so in 1874 and 1875 at Potchef-
stroom and through the Transvaal.

382. PoGoNORHYNCHUS TORQUATUS.

I have observed these birds near Pretoria and in Kaffraria.
I shot several near Rustenberg, where they abound, especially
about the fruit gardens ; they have a harsh disagreeable note.

33. PoGoNORHYNCHUS LEUCOMELAS.

I have often seen this Barbet in the Transvaal, and have
also received it from Marico. It appears to feed on fruit
and berries.

{
j

34, TRACHYPHONUS CAFER.

This remarkable-looking bird I first observed in the bush
under the mountains at Rustenberg, where I shot one from
a tree, only wounding it, when it ran away on theground, I 7
secured it after some trouble. :

35. DENDROPICUS CARDINALIS.

I have seen a few of these birds and shot one on the Rhi-
noster river, south of the Vaal, and have also received it
from Marico.

36. DENDROPICUS MENSTRUUS.
I have received this species from Marico, in the Transvaal ;
and I have seen it at the Macamac Gold-fields, near Rusten-

of the Lydenburg District. 201

berg, as well as in the bush near Pretoria; at the last place
it was running up a tree.

37. PsIrTacus MEYERI.

I saw several of the birds in the bush near Rustenberg, and
shot one. I have received them from Marico and from the
northern parts of the Transvaal.

38. TURDUS LITSITSIRUPA.

I shot one of these Thrushes amongst some brushwood
about twenty miles north of .Potchefstroom. I have often
caught a glimpse of this bird in the underwood; but it seems
to be rather shy in its habits.

39. TURDUS OLIVACEUS.

This species is pretty plentiful in the bush at Macamac. I
had one given to me which was said to have been shot some-
where in the Potchefstroom district. I never observed any
in the Free State.

40. CRATEROPUS JARDINII.

I have seen this bird in the district of Potchefstroom, but
never killed one myself. . I was told by one of my men that
he had shot it not far from the river; and I have seen a spe-
cimen said to have been procured at Marico.

4). CossyPHA CAFFRA.
I received this speeies from Lydenburg, and saw a few at
Macamac. ;

4.2. SAXICOLA BIFASCIATA.

But few specimens of this bird came under my. notice. I
procured a male, however, on a journey from Potchefstroom
to Lydenburg ; it was flitting about the stones on a hill-side
near Wittewater Rand. I have since seen it between Pot-
chefstroom and Bloemfontein, Orange Free State, always on
elevations, and never on the plains. :

43. PRATINCOLA TORQUATA.

I procured a female of this bird at Macamace, and received
a specimen from near Pretoria in 1874.

SER. III.—VOL. VI. P

Mr. F. A. Barratt’s Notes on the Birds

202

44, APALIS THORACICA.
I have never seen this species elsewhere than at Macamac
and Pilgrim’s Rest Gold-fields.

45. BRADYPTERUS BARRATTI, Sharpe, anted,p.53. PlateIV.

I shot one of these birds near Pilgrim’s Rest, Lydenburg
Gold-fields; but I cannot say much about it, as I had no time
to examine its habits. Another specimen was shot by one
of my people at the same place.

Captain Shelley has also recently obtained a pair from one
of his collectors at Natal.

46. PINDALUS RUFICAPILLUS.
Met with at Macamac and between that place and Pilgrim’s
Rest Gold-fields.

4.7, CHLOROPETA NATALENSIS, Smith.
Sylvia natalensis, Layard, B. 8. Afr. p. 102. :
Between Macamac and Lydenburg.

48. ZOSTEROPS VIRENS.
I shot this only at Macamac.

49. PROMEROPS GURNEYI.
This species was procured only between Pretoria and Ly-
denburg. I found it in the zuikerbosch, or sugar-bush.

50. NECTARINIA FAMOSA.

Common at the Lydenburg Gold-fields and Macamac, and
about the bush near the Drakenberg mountains, also on the
sides of the hills amongst the aloes near Rustenberg. My
man brought me specimens from several places in the Trans-
vaal. I have seen it in the Colony and British Kaffraria. I
have had specimens in different plumage; and they appear to
be at their best, at the Gold-fields, in January, in the rainy
season. ‘They come out between the showers and fly about,
looking very gay in their light-green plumage.

51. NECTARINIA CHALYBEA.

I have procured this Sunbird at Macamac, near Lydenburg,
Rustenberg, near Pretoria, Bloemfontein, and in British Kaf-
fraria, epee they are very abundant. I have seen as many

J.G.Keulemans ith

BRADYPTERUS

BARRATI.

Lbis. U7 Ge ae ely:

Mimtern Bros. mp.

et
44
i}
,
VA
|
:

aah

\
4 Bi
ai

of the Lydenburg District. 203

as thirty or forty fluttering about and inserting their long
beaks into the scarlet blossoms of the Kaffir boom-tree, visit-
ing first one flower and then another.

52. NECTARINIA AMETHYSTINA.

Shot one or two near Rustenberg, and observed it more
than once during my journey through the bush between Pot-
chefstroom and Rustenberg. I also saw a few in the bush
near Pretoria, and I have killed it in British Kaffraria, near
East London, in company with N. chalybea; it is, however,
much more shy in its habits than the latter bird. —

53. BuTraLis UNDULATA.
From Macamac.

54. PoGoNocICHLA STELLATA.

Common at Macamac Gold-fields. I did not observe them
near Rustenberg.

55. Liopritus NIGRICAPILLUS.

From near Lydenburg and Pilgrim’s Rest Gold-fields.

56. Batis CAPENSIS.

From Macamac. Procured on the stony coppices on the
sides of the hills, where I observed them flitting about among
the stunted brushwood.

57. TERPSIPHONE VIRIDIS.

I shot one of these birds near the town of Rustenberg; and
I found them also near the waterfall under the mountain, and
by the side of an old stone wall. I have also seen them in
the bush near Pretoria.

58. Hirunpbo RUSTICA.

I brought home two specimens killed in the SETA Sain TGne
of Potchefstroom. One is a male, apparently adult, but not
quite in full plumage, not having the long outer tail-feathers.
The other is in the curious young plumage, which, it appears,
the Common Swallow assumes only during its sojourn in
South Africa: the head is brown, with no trace of a frontal
patch ; and the throat is white. These Swallows appear every
year in the district of Potchefstroom during our summer
months.

204: Mr. F. A. Barratt’s Notes on the Birds

59. PsALIDOPROCNE HOLOMELANA.

Both at Rustenberg and Macamac this bird was rather
scarce. I shot them in the forest as they flew up and down
in the open spaces.

60. DicruRUS MUSICUS.

This Drongo Shrike I observed in great quantities in the
bush near the Magaliesberg mountains, on the Rhinoster
river (Free State), in the bush about the Vaal, and in many
other places in the Transvaal. They chase one another about,
occasionally making a swoop on some insect, returning to
a twig to enjoy their meal; at the same time any thing but
a musical chorus is kept up by them.

61. CoLivus CAPENSIS. ;

I noticed this bird in the Potchefstroom district, and
killed it on the Vaal river. I have also received it from Ma-
rico, but did not observe it at Macamac.

62. COLIUS STRIATUS.

This bird was often observed at Macamac and elsewhere on
my route from Potchefstroom to the Gold-fields. All the species
of this genus, as far as I could make out, closely resemble each
other in their habits. In British Kaffraria one cannot give
a Kaffir a greater treat than a few “ Mouse-birds,” as they
are called; and if one of them flies from a bush, sticks and
knobkeries will be thrown with such precision that the poor
bird has very little chance of escape.

63. Dryoscopus BOULBOUL. |

Shot near Lydenburg. I also received it from Maca-
mac Gold-fields, near the Drakenberg mountains. It has a
peculiar habit of puffing itself out, which is thought by some
to be a habit it assumes in order to terrify other birds. It
is certainly very pugnacious, and will not allow others to
molest it.

64. LANARIUS ATROCOCCINEUS.

This bright-coloured little bird I shot in some low under-
wood on the slopes of the Magaliesberg mountains. They do
not appear at all shy, and are very quick in their movements.

of the Lydenburg District. 205

65. PRioNops TALACOMA.

This bird somewhat resembles in its habits L. atrococcineus,
but, although frequenting the low bushes, does not confine
itself to the underwood, but comes out in the open and hunts
about for insects. Sometimes they are to be seen on a high
bush; but this is seldom the case. I shot my specimen at
Oliphants Nek, near Rustenberg, where I found them in flocks
of five or six together.

66. LANIUS COLLARIS.,

Have seen this bird on the Rhinoster river a few miles
south of the Vaal ; and I have also received it from Macamac,
and shot it myself in the neighbourhood of Potchefstroom
and Bloemfontein. The peculiar habits of this bird in killing
its victims would astonish any one not acquainted with the
habits of Shrikes. I have seen the bare side of a bush in our
garden near Bloemfontein covered with locusts and some-
times as many as twenty insects in a state of decomposition ;
occasionally, too, bones are observed hanging about. I have
noticed this species frequently in British Kafiraria.

67. LANIUS COLLURIO.
Shot one in the Potchefstroom district ; and I think I have
seen it in the Colony itself.

68. ORIOLUS GALBULA.

I observed several of these birds in the bush near Rus-
tenberg; and I think I saw them at Lydenberg Gold-fields.
I also received a specimen from Marico.. They are rather
abundant, but at the same time so wary of approach that it
was some time before I got a specimen. They frequent the
tops of trees; and I have never observed them on the ground.

69. ORIOLUS LARVATUS.
I shot this species, after some trouble in approaching it,
about four miles west of Rustenberg.

70. AMYDRUS MORIO.

This species is found distributed at certain seasons through-
out the greater part of the Transvaal and Free State ; the
birds are generally to be found in the fruit-gardens.

206 Mr. F. A. Barratt’s Notes on the Birds

71. LAMPROCOLIUS PHENICOPTERUS.

This bird I met with in several parts of the Transvaal and
Free State. They congregate in vast flocks, and keep up a
harsh chattering noise. I have also shot them near Pretoria,
Rustenberg, Potchefstroom, and near Bloemfontein; and I
noticed them on my farm on the Chaumna, British Kaffraria,
where they frequented the barns and buildings, continually
flying to and fro, like English Starlings.

72. PHOLIDAUGES VERREAUXI.

Specimens were procured by me near Rustenberg, asso-
ciated with the Amydrus.. I also saw odd ones here and
there about the old fruit-gardens.

73. HyPHANTORNIS CAPENSIS.

Procured this bird at Potchefstroom and adjoining district.
They build their nests in the trees, and seem to be contin-
ually on the move, always appearing too busy to notice the
presence of a stranger.

74, PLocEUS oRYX.

The Red “ Caffre-Fink” breeds in reeds near gardens, and
is plentiful about Bloemfontein, in the Free State, thence to
the Vaal river, Kronstadt, near Rustenberg,. Pretoria, and
Potchefstroom. Itis a very local bird; and I found it in only
a few places along the Vaal near the Diamond-fields; but I
did not observe it flying everywhere, like Chera progne.

75. HUPLECTES TAHA.

Found this bird flymg about the reeds which skirt the
ditches &c. I shot my first specimen near the Modder river,
near Bloemfontein. It is very plentiful at Potchefstroom
about the skirts of the vleys or swamps adjoining the town.
I have got them all the way up from the Modder river to
Potchefstroom, near Bloemfontein, Rustenberg, Pretoria,
Nazareth ; and I think I saw a few near the Gold-fields.

76. EKUPLECTES CAPENSIS. :

Common in the Free State and Transvaal. I have found
them breeding near Kronstadt, in the Free State, also about
Potchefstroom and elsewhere in the Transvaal, where they

_ ee

= mt ec,

Py; e

of the Lydenburg District. 207

are to be seen in company with Euplectes oryx in the reeds
near homesteads. The male birds are generally observed
perched on, or rather clinging to the tops of the reeds above
their dome-shaped nests.

77. CHERA PROGNE.

I first met with this graceful bird in the district of King-
williamstown; thence I found it on my journey through
Queenstown, Alliwal North, Basuto Land, Orange Free State,
through the Transvaal, Potchefstroom, Pretoria, Lydenburg,
up to the Gold-fields, near the Drakenberg mountains, and
at Rustenberg. Its favourite resorts are swampy ground,
vleys, and the long reeds about ponds. After a sharp shower
of rain, or in a strong wind, they are scarcely able to fly, and
can easily be knocked down; when flying they very grace-
fully arch the tail. They leave their nuptial district in the

Transvaal about the end of April or the beginning of May.

78. VIDUA PARADISEA.

Obtained my specimen near Rustenberg, where they seem
rather scarce. I have observed it near the Diamond-fields
within a short distance of the Vaal river,

79. VIDUA ARDENS.
_ I shot this little bird between Potchefstroom and Rusten-
berg, and also near Pretoria. I have seen it at Macamac
Gold-fields ; but I have not noticed it further south than Rhi-
noster river.

80. HypocHEeRa CHALYBEATA.

I found a few of this species in and around a large fruit-
garden, a few miles from Rustenberg. The ones procured
were scattered about the hedgerows, where I shot them.

81. PyRENESTES ALBIFRONS.
I shot this bird at Macamac Gold-fields, but have never
received it from anywhere else.

82. EsTRELDA CYANOGASTRA.

Shot this Finch round about the old gardens at Rustenberg.
I did not see many of them in flocks; and they appear to be
rather local birds. |

208 Mr. F. A. Barratt’s Notes on the Birds

83. EsTRELDA ASTRILD.

I recognized this little bird nearly all over the country,
Orange Free State, Diamond-fields, Potchefstroom, Pretoria,
Lydenburg Gold-fields ; and I have seen it in the Kaffir
gardens a few miles further north. I also met with it at
Rustenberg. They congregate in large flocks, and are said
by the Boers and farmers to do considerable damage to the
grain crops.

84. Macronyx cRocevs.

This bird is often killed by waggon-drivers with the whip ;
and I have frequently done so myself when I wanted a spe-
cimen. I have seen it from Bloemfontein up to Pretoria and
Nazareth, and on my trip to Rustenberg. I have never ob-
served them elsewhere than in the grass.

85. CoLUMBA GUINEZ.

Common in the Transvaal. They fly about in vast flocks
among the crops and on newly ploughed land. I have shot
several near Potchefstroom and Pretoria.

86. TURTUR SEMITORQUATUS.

Have shot this species on Vaal river near Rustenberg. I
received it from Marico, and have seen it in many places
throughout the Transvaal and Free State.

87. PERISTERA LARVATA,.
Received this bird from Macamac Gold-fields, where it is
not very uncommon.

88. CoruRNIX DACTYLISONANS.

Have shot this Quail in the Chalumna district, British
Kaftraria, where it arrived in great numbers about the end of
August. In the Transvaal it is widely distributed. I have
shot it near Pretoria, Rustenberg, Nazareth, and many other
places. - I received my last from Marico district.

89. FRANCOLINUS AFER.

Have shot this species in the district of Potchefstroom.
I obtained all my specimens in stony elevations and on the
sides of mountains, where they are found in considerable
quantity early in the morning.

of the Lydenburg District. 209

90. FRANCOLINUS NUDICOLLIS.

I procured this bird in the district of Lydenburg and in
Chalumna district, British Kaffraria, always in the thick bush,
where their loud cackling note is heard during the greater part
of the early morning.

91. FRANCOLINUS NATALENSIS.
I shot one near Rustenberg in the thick brushwood : it
ran rapidly for some time before we could get a shot at it.

92. FRANCOLINUS SWAINSONI.

This species I observed on my route between Lydenburg
and the Gold-fields. ‘They appear to be fond of water, espe-
cially small streams, where they are found at early morn.
At night they frequent the dead brushwood, and the open
in the daytime. I am not certain whether I observed them
on my trip to Rustenberg; but I have received specimens
from Macamac.

93. ANTHROPOIDES STANLEYANUS.

The Stanley Crane is generally distributed throughout the
Transvaal and Free State; and I have met with it in great
quantities between Bloemfontein and Potchefstroom. Inthe
winter I have seen as many as fifty in a flock, besides many
more in the neighbouring vleys; they are difficult to ap-
proach, but they can be shot with a rifle. They breed in the
reeds, and I have received eggs from the district of Potchef-
stroom. Their long drooping feathers are readily bought by
traders from up the country, who sell or exchange them to
the native tribes. They become very tame in confinement,
and will eat out of the hand, and follow one about. I have
never shot them further north than within a few miles
south of Lydenburg.

94. BALEARICA REGULORUM.

In the district of Potchefstroom this bird is not at all un-
common. I have seen them between Bloemfontein, Potchef-
stroom, and Pretoria. In the winter they may be seen half
a dozen together ; but in the time of nidification they are only
found in pairs. I have never found two pairs breeding to-

210 Mr. F. A. Barratt’s Notes on the Birds

gether in the same vley, but always some distance apart ; and
they can be heard a long way off, calling out “ mahem” with
a delightful mellow note. At the present time I have four
living which I brought over from the Orange Free State and
Transvaal. They all, with the exception of the young one,
have the white cheek: I have seen birds from the western
coast with it red; but I have never seen them so from the
Transvaal. All I have shot, heard of, or seen, have had the
cheek white. The eggs I have always found to be white with
a bluish cast ; some state, however, that they are spotted ; but
I have never found them so. I have seen these birds a few
miles north of Pretoria.

95. ARDEA PURPUREA.

The Purple Heron I have met with throughout my travels
in the Free State and the Transvaal, but not further north

than Nazareth, in the latter State. I found it became less
common in the southern portions of the Free State, and A.
cinerea seemed to take its place to a great extent. It is not
so shy as most of the Herons; for I could generally easily
procure a specimen near Potchefstroom when required.

96. ARDEA GARZETTA.

I shot specimens of this lovely little Egret near Pretoria,
and I have shot them near Potchefstroom both in winter and
summer.

97. ARDEA EGRETTA,.

This graceful bird, with its long sweeping plumes, is too
well known to need any description. It is, however, gene-
rally very shy, and not easily procured.

98. ARDEA ARDESIACA.
This Heron was shot near Potchefstroom while sitting on
a stone.

99. ARDEA LEUCOPTERA.

I shot the best of my specimens of this lovely bird in Octo-
ber, when it was in magnificent plumage. It is, however,
a rather wary bird; and I have often watched them from
a distance standing near a vley and occasionally curving their
long necks.

of the Lydenburg District. 211

100. ARDEA BUBULCUS.

I shot a fine male of this species in a flock which were
hopping about under some oxen, from which they were pick-
ing off the ticks. I have obtained them close to Lydenburg
and Potchefstroom, and I have seen them near Pretoria, Rus-
tenberg, and near the Vaal river. They congregate in flocks,
standing on one leg basking in the sun.

101. ARDETTA MINUTA.

The Little Bittern is considered to be rather rare in the
Transvaal, I procured two specimens on one occasion only,
in December 1874. As these birds have a knack of hiding in
the reeds, they, no doubt, often pass unobserved.

102. BorauRUS STELLARIS.

The Bittern is found plentifully in the district of Potchef-
stroom. ‘Their booming note used at one time to so frighten
the Boers that they would never go into a vley, even on
horseback, when they heard it, believing it was a large snake.
I have shot them near Bloemfontein, Orange Free State, but
never further north than about thirty miles north of Pot-
chefstroom.

103. TANTALUS IBIS.

I procured one of these at Potchefstroom, where, I am told,
a few are sometimes seen together ; but in 1875 mine was the
only specimen obtained in the district. It is said that they
inhabit similar places to G. ethiopicus.

104. GERONTICUS HTHIOPICUS.

I have observed these birds in flocks of about ten or a dozen
at the sides of vleys and swampy places near Potchefstroom
and towards the mouth of the Mooi river, where their white
plumage and black shining necks cannot but attract the notice
of the bystander. They walk about thrusting their long bills
into the mud, and then will stop suddenly and appear to
listen with their heads on one side, when they fly off, and
circling round alight a few yards further away. They have
their favourite feeding-places, which I generally found to be
in corners near the bends of the rivers. I have also shot

mie Mr. F. A. Barratt’s Notes on the Birds

them near Bloemfontein, and I have observed them a few
miles south of Pretoria.

105. GLAREOLA MELANOPTERA.

I have seen quantities of these birds among a flight of
locusts, darting about and destroying thousands of them in a
very short time. Have shot them near Pretoria, Transvaal,
in 1874, also in March 1875.

106. CuRsoRIUS BICINOTUS.

I first found this little bird running rapidly along between
the herbage growing on the flats near Sandy River, Orange
Free State. I have often watched the waggon-drivers run
after them with their whips ; and the birds would run a long
way before flying, and then only for a few yards. I haveseen
them further north, but do not remember having seen them
close to the Lydenburg Gold-fields.

107. HopLopreRvs ARMATUS.

In great abundance about Potchefstroom; and their con-
tinual clicking makes more noise than all the other birds to-
gether. I met with them in suitable places close to Lyden-
burg and in the greater part of my journey from Bloem-
fontein to the Gold-fields. I found them also on my trip to
Rustenberg.

108. GALLINAGO ZQUATORIALIS.

This Snipe is distributed through the greater part of the
Transvaal; and they breed in considerable quantities in the
swamp below Potchefstroom. In the winter months (May,
June, and July) they appear in great numbers and are shot
for forwarding to the Diamond-fields, where they command a
fair price.

109. RuyNcH#A CAPENSIS.

This beautiful Snipe does not frequent the marshy ground
about Potchefstroom in such great numbers as the last ; as
I have never known more than five or six to have been seen
in a month or so. That is about the same place where one
can see thousands of G. eguatorialis, which breed there ; but
I have never found the eggs of Rhynchea.

——

of the Lydenburg District. | 2138

110. Toranus CANESCENS.

Shot this on a vley near the Modder river, also near Kron-
stadt and near Potchefstroom. They are often seen with
Totanus ochropus flying about the farmers’ dams.

111. NumMENivs arquatus.

I have observed these birds near the vleys and in the
swamps near Potchefstroom, curling round and uttering loud
cries; but I have never observed it further north. They are
rather shy, and I only succeeded in procuring a single spe-
cimen.

112. OrtyYGoMETRA CREX.

I received one specimen from the district of Lydenburg,
where, I am told, they are rather rare and not easily killed,
being shy in their habits.

113. RaLius cHRULEUS.

This species is considerably abundant in the Transvaal;
and I have shot them as they flew among the rushes and reeds
bordering the Mooi river, but have often lost them in the
reeds.

114, Limnocorax NIGER.

Not uncommon in the vleys and reeds about the Mooi river,
Potchefstroom; and I have seen it a few miles south of Pre-
toria. They are rather shy, and are very quick in their
movements.

115. GALLINULA CHLOROPUS.

I have shot this species near the Orange river in vleys and
swamps, and in the Transvaal as far as Lydenburg. I have
also received specimens shot in December near Pretoria.

116. Furica cristata.

The Crested Coot is by no means rare, frequenting the
same places as G. chloropus. It is very quick in its move-
ments, and can run very rapidly on its feet as well as being
a swift swimmer. I have seen the young ones swimming
with the egg-shell still attached to them ; and it is curious to
see the manner in which they disappear when alarmed. To-
wards the mouth of the Mooi river, near the Vaal, I found

Va
ih
‘]

{

na
nt

Me Si
1
Pi igh
Po.
lit ;

214: On the Birds of the Lydenburg District.

them in great abundance. I have shot them a few hours
north of Pretoria.

117. SARKIDIORNIS AFRICANA.
This bird was shot near Potchefstroom in company with

Dendrocygna viduata.

118. DENDROCYGNA VIDUATA.
T shot this near Potchefstroom, where, I am informed, it

4g rare.

119. PopicEPs MINOR.

This species frequents vleys and reeds near Potchefstroom
and the mouth of the Mooiriver; they are very quick in their
movements and not easily shot.

120. GRACULUS CARBO.

I shot one of these near Kronstadt, Orange Free State, the
only one I have ever seen in that state or the Transvaal. I
found it resting on an overhanging branch near a small
stream. When I fired it dropped into the water and dived ;
on its rising I gave it the second barrel, which brought

it down.

121. GRACULUS AFRICANUS.

This little Cormorant is extremely common near Potchef-
stroom, where they can be seen in dozens. I have shot them
near Pretoria, and found them to vary a great deal in their
plumage. They dive with great rapidity, but when first rising
from the water are rather slow, so are easily killed; but if
they attain an elevation they fly swiftly and are very watchful,
twisting their long necks from side to side.

122. PLorus CONGENSIS.

The Anhinga, or Snake-bird, is found in certain localities
throughout the Transvaal. I have shot them near Potchef-
stroom and Lydenburg, and I have seen them near Pretoria
and near the Modder river, Orange Free State. I have often
seen them sitting on a dead bush overhanging the water; but
on shooting at them they have dived so quickly that I have
lost them, not being able to see which way they had gone.
I observed several in the Chaumna district, between the Kas-
kama and Buffalo River, British Kaffraria.

On the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 215

XX.—WNotes on the Birds of the Lower Petchora. By Hunry
SEEBOHM, F.Z.S., and Joun A. Harvie Brown.

{Continued from page 126. ]
(Plate V.)

RvTIcILLA PH@NIcURA (L.).

We shot the first Redstart on 12th May, in the streets of
Ust Zylma. We afterwards found it sparingly on the out-
skirts of the birch-forests both near Ust Zylma and Habariki ;
but we did not meet with it further north. We found it to
be one of the shyest of the small birds of the district.

SAXICOLA @NANTHE (L.).

We saw the first Wheatear on 21st May, at Ust Zylma.
It afterwards became rather common there. Further north
it was rarer, but we saw it as far as Dvoinik.

PRATINCOLA RUBICOLA (L.).

The Asiatic form of the Stonechat, with white upper tail-
coverts, was not uncommon in suitable localities near Ust
Zylma and Habariki; but we did not meet with it further
north.

PHYLLOScoPUs TROcHILUS (L.).

The Willow-Wren is by far the commonest Warbler in the
extreme north of Europe. Seebohm found it abundant on the
fields of Norway from the North Cape to the Varanger fjord.
Harvie Brown and Alston found it equally common at Arch-
angel. In their paper in ‘ The Ibis’ (Jan. 1873), P. evers-
manni* only was mentioned ; but a re-examination of the skins
proves that P. trochilus is the commoner bird. In the valley
of the Petchora we found it common, both in the forests of Ust
Zylma and the willow-swamps on the islands of the delta and
the tundra. As we proceeded far north it became somewhat
rarer; but we found it among the dwarf willows at Dvoinik,
the most northerly point on the tundra which we visited.
We never before so thoroughly realized its right to the name
of Willow-Warbler. We first heard the familiar note of this

* P, eversmanni (Midd. nec Bp.) will probably rank as a synonym of
P. borealis (Blasius).

216 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

bird on the 20th May, but did not succeed in obtaining a speci-
men until the 23rd, by which time it had become common.
At one time we were under the impression that there must
be two species of these birds, one of them a smaller, more
buff-breasted, and much more silent bird; and we consequently
brought home more than forty skins for examination. We
are now convinced that the difference in size and habits is
merely the difference of sex.

On the 12th June, as we were slowly creeping down the
great river, we stopped to cook under the lee of a steep bank
of the Petchora, just before we entered the delta. The bank
was wooded to the water’s edge; and Seebohm spent some
hours exploring the dwarf forest. Willow-Wrens were com-
mon; and his attention was arrested by one which was most
vociferously uttering a note unlike any that he had ever heard
from a Willow-Warbler. The note reminded him somewhat of
the spitting of a cat, a hissing sound, which he attempted on the
spot to expressin words. He shot the bird and tied to its leg
a label marked Tuz-zuk Warbler, to remind him.of the note.
The bird proved to be a female. The respective lengths of
the wing and tail agree with female P. trochilus; but the wing-
formula is different. Out of at least a hundred skins of P. tro-
chilus which Seebohm has examined, he has always found the
second primary intermediate in length between the fifth and
sixth. In the bird in question the second primary is inter-
mediate in length between the sixth and seventh. Whether
this bird be a different species or not requires further inves-
tigation.

PHYLLOSCOPUS BOREALIS (Blasius).

In Seebohm’s collection there are three skins of this species
from North-east Russia. One was shot by Harvie Brown and
Alston near Archangel ; a second was procured by Piottuch at
Mesen; and the third was shot by Seebohm in the same locality
as the variety of P. trochilus just mentioned, and whilst he was
searching for a second specimen. He remarked in his diary at
the time that the note was more rapid than that of P. trochilus,
and more resembling that of the Whitethroat. In fact the

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 217

song is more that of a Hypolais, a genus which the bird also
resembles in the large size and width of the bill. This species
is a very distinct one. In size and colour it resembles P. tro-
chilus, but has a distinct pale bar across the wings, caused.
by the wing-coverts being pale at the tips. The wing-for-
mula is the same, except that the bastard primary is very
much less, in fact as small as that of P. sidbilatriz. It further
resembles P. sidilatriv in having a comparatively shorter tail.
We only met with this one specimen of P. borealis, and

are consequently unable to give any further information re-
specting it.

PHYLLOscoPus TRISTIS (Blyth).

On 22nd May we shot a small Warbler uttering a plaintive
call-note (a single note repeated at intervals) that we were
unfamiliar with. The bird resembled a Chiffchaff in size,
length of wing and tail, and wing-formula, but differed from
that bird in having no yellow on the belly and under tail-
coverts, and also in having black legs, instead of dark brown.
On the following day we heard a loud call-note, reminding
us of that of the Chiffchaff, but somewhat different; and shortly
afterwards we watched the bird singing on a spruce-fir. The
song was a repetition of its call-note with a few more musical
notes introduced. This bird proved to be the same as that
we had shot on the previous day. Wemet withit repeatedly
in the same valley near Ust Zylma, but found it very difficult
to shoot. It was still more abundant on the willow-covered
islands of the delta, and we obtained several more specimens
- and one nest and seven eggs. Upon our return home we
submitted our skins to our friend Mr. Dresser, who pro-
nounced the bird to be P. tristis of Blyth. We are fortunate
in being able to add this species to the fauna of the Western
Palearctic region, and have ventured to give it the English
name of the Siberian Chiffchaff. This bird has hitherto been

known as a winter visitor to India, though Mr. Brooks states, -

but without naming his authority, that it breeds in Ladak,
mentioning the eggs, however, as being still amongst the
desiderata in collections (vide Ibis, 1872, p. 31).

SER. III.—VOL. VI. Q

= = a peitec = = =e Fuses
Se age ee
65 = : ~ 3

in
SS —,
ere ae

———- —————
ted

SSE

218 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

PHyLLoscoPus NecLectus (Hume).

In ‘ The Ibis’ for 1869, p. 236, Mr. W. E. Brooks writes:—
“7 have, however, a single specimen, a female, of a Phyllo-
scopus which I cannot make out. This bird exactly resembles
in size and colour P. brevirostris’’ (tristis), “ but is entirely
without any yellow under the wings, nor is there any tinge of
greenish yellow on the edges of the lesser wing-coverts. This
bird Mr. Hume pronounced to be the English Chiffchaff (P.
rufus), because it was white under the wings instead of yel-
low.” To this Mr. Allen Hume replies in ‘ The Ibis’ for
1870, page 143, “there has been some mistake between
Mr. Brooks and myself about the Phylloscopus with a white
wing-lining. The bird he refers to is the species I call Phyl-
loscopus neglectus,’ &c. If this species be a good one, which
there seems to be some reason to doubt, we have much plea-
sure in being able to add it to the European fauna. On 8rd
June Seebohm shot a male Phylloscopus which agrees with
Mr. Hume’s description. It differs from P. tristis in having
white instead of yellow. axillaries, in having the edges of the
primaries without any tinge of yellow, in having a decidedly
shorter tail, and a slightly smaller bastard primary. It was
frequenting some tall willows in a pine-forest at Habariki.
We may also remark that some of the small Phylloscopi which
we observed in the same neighbourhood, appeared to have
a richer and more varied song than those we heard at Ust
Zylma, and may have been this species.

CALAMODYTA PHRAGMITIS (Bechst.).

Next to the Willow-Wren the Sedge-Warbler is certainly
the commonest songster on the willow-swamps of the islands
of the delta. Curiously enough, we did not meet with this
bird either at Ust Zylma or at Habariki. We first met with
it on the Yorsa river. As the Bluethroat became rarer the
Sedge-Warbler became commoner. We did not find it north
of the delta; nor did it appear to frequent the willow-swamps
which we frequently met with on the tundra.

PARUS KAMCHATKENSIS, Bp.
We met with this eastern representative of the Northern

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 219

Marsh-Tit sparingly at Ust Zylma and Habariki as long as
snow continued on the ground, but did not see it afterwards.

Parus cinctus, Bodd.

We found one pair of the Lap Titmouse at Ust Zylma, and
met with it more abundantly at Habariki. Further north it
again became rarer, and the last specimens we procured were
frequenting a willow-swamp a few miles to the north of the
arctic circle. On comparing our specimens with the bird
figured in Dresser’s ‘ Birds of Europe,’ and with his type of
P. grisescens, we remark that our birds approach the latter
species in being less russet on the flanks, and showing more
conspicuously the white edgings to the wing- and tail-feathers
than the western form.

AMPELIS GARRULUS, L.

We shot a pair of Waxwings at Habariki on 4th June; and
Seebohm saw a party of six flying north on the 12th, shortly
before we reached the Yorsa river. In the frozen-market at
St. Petersburg we bought a dozen of these beautiful birds for
eighty kopecs ; but they all turned out to be males. The pair
we shot at Habariki were not in very good plumage, having
very. few and small wax appendages on the secondaries. The
eggs in the female were very large, and the testes of the male
very fully developed. As the yellow on the primaries is I-
shaped and not V-shaped, we presume the male to bea young
bird. In this pair the male differs from the female in the
following particulars :—It is a larger bird, with longer wings
and tail, and slightly larger crest. The black on the throat
is much deeper in colour, and much more sharply defined.
The bar of yellow on the tail is much broader. The wax ap-
pendages are larger, and there are more of them. ‘The yel-
low on the primaries is more brilliant, and the white on the
secondaries and on the wing-coverts is larger. Finally, the
chestnut on the under tail-coverts is decidedly darker in shade.
The difference in the colour of the under tail-coverts of the
two sexes is about the same as that between a ripe horse-
chestnut freshly taken from the husk, and one which has been
exposed for a day or two to the air. This will probably be

Q 2

229 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

found to be the easiest mode of distinguishing the sexes, as,
so far as our observations extend, we have found it constant
at all ages. Alston and Harvie Brown observed it at Arch-
angel in 1872, and were always able to separate the sexes at
a glance when the birds were procured.

Hirvunpbo rustica, L.

On the 26th May a Common-Swallow was seen at Ust
Zylma skimming along the river-bank close to the houses of
the town; and on the 8rd June we shot a single bird which
was chasing the insects round the houses at Habariki. This
appeared to be the single Swallow which makes a summer on
the Lower Petchora; at least we saw no more afterwards. It
is possible, however, that we left these localities before the
main body arrived.

CotyLE RrpaRiA (L.).

We saw the first Sand-Martin on the day we left Ust Zylma
(10th June), between that place and Habariki. Afterwards
we met with the species in small numbers at Gorodok and at
Kuya, and obtained specimens. The unusually dark plumage
was remarked in these and other specimens as being quite in
striking contrast to that of specimens obtained in Great
Britain (vide also Ibis, 1873, p. 59). Nowhere on the Pet-
chora did we find the Sand-Martins so abundant as they are
in summer on the islands of the Dvina at Archangel, where
nearly every suitable bank holds a large colony (Joc. cit.).

LaGorus AaLBus (Gm.). .

Although we bought numbers of the Capercaillie and Hazel-
Grouse for food from the native peasant sportsmen during our
stay at Ust Zylma, we did not have a single Willow-Grouse
brought to us until the 9th June. We were told by M. Znéa-
minsky and M. Sacharoff, and others, that ‘ Kouropatki”
are remarkable for their abundance in some seasons, and just
as remarkable for their scarcity in others. On the tundra,
in certain localities, as at Yooshina and Stanavoialachta, we
found them plentiful; and they formed, along with Ducks
and Geese, a staple article of our diet for many a day.

We met with them as far north as we went on the tundra,

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 221

viz. to Dvoinik, frequenting the low willow-bushes or knolls,
and avoiding the long level stretches of bare tundra.

TEeTRAO TETRIX, L.

We only once met with this species, viz. between Yorsa and
Chuvinski, some forty versts north of Habariki, where we
found a nest containing five eggs on an island. The sur-
rounding ground was covered with tall alder and birch; and
long grass covered the raised bank which formed a break-
water between the river and a lagoon, and upon which the
nest was placed. The Greyhen was flushed off the nest, but
not shot.

TETRAO UROGALLUS, L.

As with the last species, many Capercaillie hens were
brought in for sale, at forty kopecs per brace. The peasants
do not shoot the males, as they are not considered good food.
Although we saw several Capercaillie cocks southward from
Ust Zylma, we met with none there in the forests, nor at
Habariki.

TETRASTES BONASIA (L.).

Many of these birds were sold to us by the peasants, cost-
ing twenty kopecs per brace, at Ust Zylma; but we had not
the good luck to meet with any ourselves, either at that place
or further north. Being a pine-forest species, it probably does
not occur further north than Bougéeffskia, which is said to
be upon the northern limit of the pine-woods along the river- —
banks.

CHARADRIUS PLUVIALIS, L.

Many Golden Plovers passed during the time of migration,
alighting occasionally in the fields on the hill-slopes behind
the town to feed. At this season it is not difficult to call
these migratory birds within range by an imitation of their
note. We obtained the first specimens on the 17th May, and
again met with the species at Habariki, where a single pair
was haunting the newly sown fields close behind the village.
After that a specimen was shot at Kuya by Seebohm, which
has one of the axillary feathers slightly splashed with smoky

222 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

brown; and we again met with Golden Plovers at Vassilkova,
Yooshina, Stanavoialachta, and Dvoinik. They frequented
totally different ground from the Grey Plovers, affecting the
round exposed knolls in preference to the flat bogs, and being
almost always found where the tundra had more of the rolling
character of prairie, intersected by willow-patches and minia-
ture valleys, narrow deep streams of pure sparkling water, and
clear tarns surrounded with brushwood. It is worthy of note
that we scarcely ever found the Golden and Grey Plovers
frequenting the same kind of ground. Ifa patch of Grey-Plover
ground lay surrounded by knolls of dryer tundra, that patch
might hold its pair of Grey Plovers, which, when disturbed,
would occasionally alight on the higher ground ; but it was
rarely that we saw a Golden Plover settle on the hummocky
ground at the base of the knolls, though in other countries
(as, for instance, Scotland) the latter is often their favourite
ground for breeding on. Several pairs of Golden Plovers
were watched to their nests or shot at them. They exhibited,
if any thing, rather more shyness than the Grey Plovers did,
though in general habits and mode of approaching the nest
there was scarcely any perceptible difference.

SQUATAROLA HELVETICA (Linn.).

We arrived at Alexievka on the 19th June, after a ten
days’ voyage down the river from Ust Zylma. We had left
far behind us the thick forests of small spruce which crown
the heights behind Ust Zylma, and the older forests of pine
and spruce and larch at Habariki. We had glided past the
dense thickets of tail birch, leaving the last of these behind
at Viski, and had entered upon the true delta, the flat willow-
covered islands of which had only a short time before been
three or four feet under the overflow of the great river. As
we approached Alexievka, we had seen afar off, with longing
eyes, the low outline of the skirts of the Great Zémelskaya
tundra upon the eastern bank of the river ; and we knew that
it stretched away eastward to the Ural Mountains, and north-
eastwards to the gates of the Kara Sea. We had landed on
the willow-covered islands here and there during our voyage

pat

C.J Fleming del.

BraGs OF

Ibis.1876.P1V

M&N.Hanhart lith

DOUATAROLA TEIVE TICA.

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 223

down the river, and had secured some interesting species of
birds ; but on the whole we felt disappointed in the delta, with
its never-ending almost impenetrable willow-swamps and
winding “ Kurias ” and little pools of water. Our experience
of every island was almost the same—the same landscape,
the same conditions, the same bird-life ; and we looked for-
ward with eagerness to the real new land, the land of promise
—Arkya Ya, the great land of the Samoyedes.

During all the time we remained at Ust Zylma, while the
migration was going on, we had seen nothing of the Grey
Plover. We saw many Plovers passing over, or resting or
feeding in little flocks in the ploughed or newly sown fields ;
but all those which we shot or identified belonged to the com-
mon species. We had therefore little expectation of after-
wards meeting with it at its breeding-haunts*.

But a glad surprise awaited us. On the 22nd June we at
last had our wishes gratified. Wecrossed from Alexievka in
our clumsy unmanageable boat, to the eastern or right bank
of the river, and, climbing up the steep clay slope, stood upon
the tundra. We had a large party on this our first day on
the tundra—all our little force in fact,—Piottuch and our-
selves, and our four men—Simeon the Samoyede, Little Feo-
dor the half-breed, Gavriel and Big Feodor, Russians. Little
did we guess as we stood on the top of the steep river-bank
and gazed away inland over the wide expanse of moor and

* Much valuable information concerning the migrations and arrivals of
some of our rarer European Waders on the Volga and Kama rivers is con-
tained in a Russian work, of which we give the complete title below, and
which we had an opportunity afterwards of consulting with Piottuch’s
assistance. In it the authors, speaking of the present species, inform us
that it is seen on both migrations in May and September, in small flocks,
in the neighbourhood of Kasan, but not every year. Thence, doubtless,
these migratory flocks in spring descend the Petchora river as far as Ust
Ussa (the mouth of the river Ussa), and spread over the Great Zémelskaya
tundra northwards, without going round by Ust Zylma. The full title
and reference to the above-mentioned work is as follows :—“ Materials
for forming a Biography of the Birds of the Volga,” being Chapters IL.,
IIL., and IV. of Part 1, vol. i. of ‘Descriptive Catalogue of the High
School of the Imperial University of Kasan.’ Edited by MM. Kova-
levsky, Levakovsky, Golovinski, and Bogdanoff. Kasan: 1871.

324, Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

bog, how soon one of the great prizes we had come so far
in the hopes of gaining would be within our grasp.

After crossing over a tract of moor sloping gently inland
some versts from the river, and which was comparatively des-
titute of bird-life, raismmg a few Lapland Buntings and Red-
throated Pipits, or an occasional Willow-Grouse or Dunlin,
we came in view of a vast stretch of low hummocky tundra,
its surface studded over with bright little pools and lakelets
glancing in the sun, The low rounded hills beyond Vassil-
kova form the boundary-line to this great plain; and further
off a higher range, appearing blue in the distance, is to be
seen in the direction of Stanavoialachta, some forty versts
lower down the river. Dotted over the tundra,:as already
observed, are tarns and round pools of water. These have
overhanging peat- or green mossy banks. Curious hollows,
apparently the dried-up beds of former lakes, occur also,
having the same peat banks or mossy edges, the bottoms
covered with long grass, marshy ground, thickets of Willow-
scrub and stunted birch, and here and there a little open
pool of water. Over the surface of the moor, where we found
the birds breeding, are small patches of level black or brown
peat-bog, which are destitute of vegetation in the centre, but
covered with a species of yellowish brown Sphagnum round
the edges. Crossing over these the foot sank to the depth
of about 18 inches, and was then supported by the hard-
frozen ground beneath. Winding about amongst these black
bogs, like the network on the rind of a melon, are low narrow
ridges, or wider plateaux, a foot or two in height, formed by
innumerable hummocks of peat, covered with reindeer-moss,
cranberries, and patches of the green leaves and red flowers
of the arctic bramble (Rudus arcticus). A few plants also
of the sweet-smelling Ledum palustre are scattered here and
there over the ground. On these higher and drier ridges
were the Grey Plovers’ nests—simple shallow depressions in
the moss or peaty soil, lined with a small handful of broken
twigs and leaves of the surrounding plants. This description
may be held generally to apply to all the places where we
found the Grey Plover breeding. They preferred these low-

se ee, ee eee ee

;
;
3
.
j
7

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 225

lying boggy tracts to the higher and more undulating parts
of the tundra, in which latter situation we afterwards found
the Golden Plover nesting.

Accompanied by Piottuch and the men, Harvie Brown
walked on rapidly towards this seeming land of promise,
keeping a sharp look-out for any species of Plover (because
on the 18th Seebohm had shot a Golden Plover which had
one of the axillary plumes splashed with smoky brown). They
had not much hope or even thought, at the time, of finding
the Grey Plover. When therefore a bird was seen about 200
yards off to rise from the tundra, and heard to utter a Plo-
ver’s whistle, Harvie Brown at first took it for one of the
common species ; but he quickly saw his mistake when it again
alighted somewhat nearer, and the strong contrast of the
black and white parts of the plumage showed distinctly. He
lost no time in putting the identity of the bird beyond a
doubt by using his binocular. This was no sooner accom-
plished than the bird again took wing, and, rising high in the
air, joined four others which were flying in erratic circles high
overhead. ‘These, as we afterwards came to learn, were the
male birds. A reward was now offered to the men for the
first nests they should find. Simeon set to work in a per-
severing patient manner, threading with slow step and sure
the mazes of the network of hummocks, his hands crossed
behind his back, and his eyes fixed upon the ground. Gavy-
riel, the tall Russian, stalked away over the tundra until he
disappeared over a distant rise. After a good hour’s search
Simeon was rewarded, and, waking up from his usual phlegma,
cried out, “ Yaitsa-yaitsa! dobra yaitsa!’’ (“The eggs, the
eggs! the good eggs”’); and Harvie Brown ran up to him.

Simeon was kneeling beside the nest with a quiet pleased
smile on his face. The nest contained four eggs, intermediate
in appearance between Golden Plover’s eggs and Lapwing’s.
Immediately after, Seebohm joined in, and together we feasted
our eyes for a brief space of time. It was then agreed that
Harvie Brown should remain behind and wait for the bird,
while the others moved away to renew the search. The fol-
lowing is extracted from Harvie Brown’s Journal :—“TI lay

226 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

down about forty yards from the nest, well concealed behind
a ridge of the dryer ground; and very soon after I heard the
ery of the birds. Then I saw them fly round, low over the
tundra, and alight on the tops of the hummocks. Presently
one ran towards me, stood up again on a hummock, and cried
“ Pl-wee,” the first syllable short and low, the second louder
and prolonged—shriller, I thought, than a Golden Plover’s.
The birds’ behaviour near the nest appeared to me to be ex-
actly similar to that of a Golden Plover—sitting erect on the
higher hummocks, running rapidly across the hollows, whis-
tling at intervals, then flying in a wide circle round the nest—
not, like the more cautious Dotterel, running round the hum-
mocks or grey stones, pausing in the hollows, silent, running
over a ridge out of sight, head down, and reappearing from a
diametrically opposite direction. I missed both barrels at
the bird. I misjudged the distance, my eyes being almost
level with the tops of the hummocks, and the intervening hol-
lows being shut out from my range of vision. But it came
again, and after a stalk I shot it. It was the male bird.”
Early in the season we found it an easy matter to watch the
birds to the nests ; and it was thus that we found most of our
nests. On this day, however, we found four nests by simply
searching for them, Simeon finding two, Gavriel one, and
Harvie Brown the fourth; at each of these nests one of the
birds was shot. As we afterwards came to learn, the habits of
the male and female differ somewhat, as with the Golden Plover,
as the season advances. When the eggs are fresh, or slightly
incubated, the hen is the more anxious parent, and is far
more restless than the male, running backwards and forwards
near the nest, approaching and retreating, and uttering the
alarm-note, whilst the male stands for the most part silent,
and for a considerable length of time in the same place. Later
in the season, when the eggs are almost hatched, the male
becomes as solicitous as the female, constantly uttering the
alarm-note and shamming lameness ora broken wing. In one
instance a male bird, when near the nest, suddenly ran across
a grass-covered bit of flat bog, head down and bill open, lay
down on his breast, and stretched out his wings to the full

—— ae a

= ee ae eee ee ee

.§ pees, <a> i

es ee ee ee ee ee

ee ok ee

aa Sil

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 227

extent along the ground, and for quite halfa minute remained
in this singular position.

The following are a few extracts from Harvie Brown’s
Journal.

(Concerning the cries of the birds, considerable difference
exists between our respective opinions as to how they should
be rendered in words. They are, however, three in number :—
first, the call-note between male and female, a double whistle,
the first syllable short, the second drawn out; second, the
alarm-note, a single plaintive whistle, about a half note higher
than that of a Golden Plover; and, third, a treble whistle, the
second syllable having a lower intonation than the first and
third. This latter is not so commonly used, and appears to
be the call-note of the males to one another when flying apart
from the females, and is generally uttered when the birds are.
flying high in the air. The males associate in small parties
of three and four; and a peculiar phase of flight is then ob-
servable. They rise to a great height and dash about in
erratic curves, or diving down impetuously, rapidly rise again ;
they then remain almost stationary, like a Temminck’s Stint,
raising the wings over the back until they nearly meet, and
finally, flying with long Tern-like sweeps of the wings, utter
their musical treble note.)

“ Oth July, 1875.—About 12 o’clock we went across to the
tundra, this time higher up the river, beyond the ruined hut.
Seebohm and I again renewed our search for Grey Plovers,
and having found a pair, watched the female to the nest.
This nest was placed at the foot of a ridge, close to damp
ground, not on the top as was the case with the previous
nests. We were a long time over this nest, quite an hour
and a half, having at first lain down within ten yards of it.
The bird, after we shifted our position, went on very quickly ;
and I shot her as she again moved off. These four eggs are
lighter-coloured than any we have got hitherto.

“ Shortly afterwards we saw a bird fly off just where Simeon
some time before had been searching. We at once lay down;
and in about ten or fifteen minutes the bird went onto
the nest, which contained also four eggs. This nest was on

228 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

the top of a hummock, one of a ridge of dark peaty loam;
and the eggs are much darker. At the first nest to-day
the birds were remarkably silent, and the female only once
or twice uttered the single note before going onto the
nest. ‘The males generally arrive in the vicinity of the nest
after the females do, remain stationary in one spot for a long
time, and when the females settle on the nests, take wing and
fly off. The males appear darker to the eye, blacker-breasted,
and whiter over the eye; but some females are much darker
than others, and are nearly as dark as some males. As the,
season advances, the males retain their full plumage longer,
whilst the female becomes much lighter, and the black on
the breast becomes narrower.

25th July—At 150 yards distance a female appeared
of a dull grey colour; and at 15 yards only a narrow strip
of black on the breast was discernible; but at 150 yards the
breast of the male seemed as black as ever.

“Tt was trying work to-day waiting to find these nests;
the mosquitoes swarmed over our hats and veils and clothes.
As we lay looking along the ridges and across the hollows,
they seemed like a mist on the tundra, and the unceasing
hum of the legions around us dulled the sounds of the smaller

bird-voices further off. They got inside our veils, they crept ,

up our cavalry gauntlets and bit our wrists, or searched
patiently for openings in the sewing, and they found out rents
and thin places in our clothes. They blinded us with their
legions, deafened us with their hum, nearly beat us off by
their force of character and determination.

2th July.—Later in the day Seebohm and I watched
another pair of Grey Plovers; but on this occasion, as with
the last pair of birds, the male showed more finesse and
anxiety than the female. We failed in marking the female
to the nest, but went forward to the places where we had
respectively seen her twice disappear. As it afterwards turned
out, Seebohm went about 20 yards too far to the left, and I
about the same to the right. Both birds flew round us in
circles. I concluded that they had young, and Seebohm that
they had eggs. We had despaired of finding them, eggs or

4
ee ee ee ee ee ee

ee ee el. Ss xe

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 229

young, and were walking away, when we stumbled upon the
nest, which contained three eggs. A young bird, apparently
only very lately hatched, crouched within two feet of the nest,
its yellow colour being very conspicuous against the grey
lichen-covered ground. The young closely resemble the
young of Charadrius pluvialis, but have the darker parts of
the upper plumage larger and more conspicuous™*.

“To-day we found great areas of tundra quite unoccupied
by the species. They appear to be thinly scattered over the
tundra, preferring the lower-lying damper portions, and where
the hummocks le in ridges and not broadcast. Doubtless
they prefer these situations partly, if not wholly, on account
of the greater quantity of yellow-green moss growing there,
which must afford excellent concealment for the young, to
which it closely approximates in colour. We have observed
before, in Scotland, how difficult it is to detect young Golden
Plover (as compared with some other young of Waders) as
they lie flat upon the yellow patches of moss, head down, and
legs drawn in under the body.”

We obtained several nests of eggs, besides the above, which
were deeply incubated. These we laid upon warmed cotton-
wool along with the young bird, and covered them all over
lightly with goose’s down. Early the following morning we
started on a trip to the Golievski banks, which stretch across
the entrance of the Petchora Gulf, in the Company’s steamer;
and we took the precious boxful of young and eggs along with
us, having covered them over, down, cotton, and all, with a
mosquito-veil. ‘The sun was hot and the day fine; and five of
‘the young were successfully hatched out, and were strong and
healthy.

As will be seen from the plates, the eggs of the Grey Plover

* Since returning home Harvie Brown has compared specimens of the
young of both species. Besides the above distinction, not to speak of the
absence or presence of the hind toe, he finds that the young of the Golden
Plover are brighter in colour, and that the white of the lower parts, where
it joins the upper, is suffused with yellow, as also is the light-coloured
collar on the back of the neck. In the young of the Grey Plover the

dorsal plumage is duller in tinge, greener, and the white parts bordering
on the yellow are purer.

— > =) spel pares
ee ee ae ee ee

SSS

230 Mr. J. H. Gurney’s Notes on

are intermediate in appearance between those of the Golden
Plover and Lapwing. The very dark variety is one of the
set of four found on dark peaty ground, above alluded to; and
the light-coloured variety is one of the set found at the base
of the ridge of hummocks, where a quantity of dead and
bleached Sphagnum covered the edges of the flat peat-bog.
The former set of eggs was the only one found actually laid
on peaty dark soil, and the latter the only set found at the
base of the ridge amongst the bleached Sphagnum ; and they
present the extremes in darkness and lightness of ground-
colour. In a series of sixteen eggs, measured by Harvie
Brown, they are found to vary in size from 274, by 114 of
an inch to 13% by 114 of an inch, agreeing with measure-
ments of the eggs brought by Herr A. von Middendorff from
Siberia (Dresser, ‘ Birds of Europe,’ temporary vol. i.).
[To be continued. |

_XXI.—Notes on a ‘ Catalogue of the Accipitres in the British
Museum,’ by R. Bowdler Sharpe (1874). By J. H. Gurney.

[Continued from p. 76. ]

Havine concluded my last paper by a reference to the
Buzzard of the Galapagos Islands, it may be convenient that
I should next advert to another insular species, a native of a
still more isolated habitat in the Pacific Ocean—Buteo soli-
tarius of Peale.

The type specimen, which is preserved in the Academy of
Natural Sciences at Philadelphia, and which, I believe, is still
unique, was obtained near Karakaloa Bay in the island of
Hawaii, the largest of the Sandwich group, and was described
by Peale under the above name in the first edition of
‘The Zoology of the United-States Exploring Expedition,’
published in 1848; but in the later edition of that work,
published in 1858, and edited by Cassin, this species was
removed by that ornithologist to the genus Pandion, with the
following remark :—‘ This bird is strictly a member of a
subgenus of the generic group Pandion, designated Polioaétus
by Dr. Kaup” (vide op. cit. p. 98).

Se ee ee =

eS ee eee ee ee ee ee ee eee ee

Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres. 231

Mr. Sharpe, in a footnote at p. 452 of his work, adopts
Cassin’s view, and refers to this species under the title of
Polhoaétus solitarius, stating, however, that he is not per-
sonally acquainted with it.

On the other hand, Mr. Ridgway, who has been so good as
to write to me respecting this remarkable bird, and whose
words I now quote, describes the result of his examina-
tion of the type specimen to be, that he considers it “a
Buteonine form, differing from the true Buteones only, so
far as I can see, in the system of coloration, which reminds
one somewhat of Milvago chimachima. Like B. borealis, B.
desertorum, &c., four primaries have their inner webs cut; but
they are sinuated rather than emarginated, and more. as in
Leucopternis; the fifth is the longest, the first shorter than
the ninth.”’

The figure given in the plates to Cassin’s edition of the
United-States Exploring Expedition appears to me to favour
Mr. Ridgway’s view, and to confirm Peale’s original allocation
of this species in the genus Buteo.

To return to the Buzzards of the American continent, I
now propose to allude to Buteo abbreviatus, a species which
seems to me to occupy a somewhat solitary position in the
Buteonine family, not grouping very closely with any of its
congeners. Both the specimens of this Buzzard, of which
Mr. Sharpe gives the measurements, appear by their dimen-
sions to be females, those of two examples (one an ascertained
male) given in Baird, Brewer, and Ridgway’s ‘ Land Birds
of North America’ (vol. iii. p. 273) being very considerably
less.

The type of Buteo zonocercus in the Norwich Museum,
which is now ascertained to be an adult example of B. abbre-
viatus, is also, from its small size, no doubt a male bird. I
have recently remeasured this specimen, and find the wing a
little longer, and the tarsus rather shorter, than originally
described in the P. Z. S. for 1858, p. 180; the correct mea-
surement of the wing appears to me to be 15 inches, and
that of the tarsus 2°7.

Messrs. Baird, Brewer, and Ridgway (loc. cit.) describe a

Se — =
se 4
ar

a —

232 Mr. J. H. Gurney’s Notes on |

very interesting specimen of this Buzzard in a state of change
from the immature to the adult plumage, and also a specimen
which they consider to be fully adult, as well as a young
male.

From a comparison of the two first-mentioned descriptions
with that given of the adult by Mr. Sharpe, and with the
specimen in the Norwich Museum already mentioned as the
type of B. zonocercus, it would appear that-the mature birds
of this species vary in some degree as regards the markings
on the tail; and this probably indicates that the final adjust-
ment of coloration on the rectrices is only very gradually
attained in this, as in some other species of the genus Buteo.

An immature specimen in the Norwich Museum agrees
generally with Mr. Sharpe’s description of the type of B.
albonotaius (now also recognized as a synonym of B. abbre-
viatus), with the exception that the ground-colour of the
plumage is dark brown instead of black as in the speci-
men described by Mr. Sharpe.

I now come to two North-American Buzzards that ap-
pear to me to form a group, which (including a third local
race not yet acknowledged as specifically distinct) is notable
for peculiarities of marking and coloration, by which these
birds, when in adult dress, are readily distinguishable from
any other members of the genus Buteo. These are Buteo
lineatus and Buteo elegans, the former being an inhabitant of
the eastern regions of North America, from Texas to New
Brunswick, the latter of the western from Mexico to Cali-
fornia—both meeting in Texas during the winter months,
according to the observations of Mr. Dresser recorded in ‘ The
Ibis’ for 1865, p. 325.

Mr. Sharpe merely gives B. elegans as a synonym of B.
lineatus ; but to me it appears sufficiently distinct to be at
least admitted as a good subspecies.

Full descriptions of B. elegans in both its immature and
adult dress will be found in the ‘ Birds of North America,’ by
Baird, Cassin, and Lawrence, p. 28, and in the ‘ Land Birds
of North America,’ by Baird, Brewer, and Ridgway, vol. iii.
p.-277. The adult and immature of this species are figured

Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres. 233

in plates 2 and 3 of the former work, to which figures Mr.
Sharpe has omitted to give a reference.

According to the authors of the ‘Land Birds of North
America,’ a third race is found in Florida, differing from the
typical B. lineatus in its smaller size and in the darker
coloration of its immature plumage; and I am indebted to
that work for the materials for the following table of com-
parative measurements.

Wing from Middle
carpal joint. Tarsus, toe.
inches. inches, inches.
Buteo lineatus :
Smallest of twenty northern males 11:25 2-7 13
Largest of twenty northern males 13°5 3°25 15
Smallest of seven northern females 13°35 31 1:35
Largest of seven northern females 14:25 3°2 15
Buteo elegans :
Anadulipmaloiaas \2 itor de cat 125 2°9 1-4
LL YOUN MRL 1 aie esis Bl 12 2°82 1°35
BR VOUT ACMALO Se gas. dies ws 13 2°9 1°52
Florida race : :
Smallest of twelve specimens (sex
MOGBIVER Soraya: ote ae els 10:9 2°9 1:25
Largest of twelve specimens (sex
reais bes RO ae cE 12°75 3'2 1°45

It would probably be convenient and permissible to apply
@ specific appellation to distinguish this small Florida race ;
but I am not aware of this having as yet been done.

The two next species in Mr. Sharpe’s work are those which
stand under the respective names of Buteo latissimus and Buteo
obsoletus, both of which are included by Mr. Ridgway, in his
recent paper on the genus Crazirex to which I have already
referred, among those Buzzards which have only the first three
primaries emarginated ; but this character is, according to my
experience, more constant in the first of these species than in
the second, the fourth primary being in the latter not unfre-
quently sinuated, and in one instance within my knowledge,
an adult female from Mexico, in the Norwich Museum,
distinctly notched.

In other respects both species show greets with the
central section of the genus Buteo, of which B. vulgaris is

SER. II1I.—VOL. VI. R

234 ‘Mr. J. H. Gurney’s Notes on

the type; but B. latissimus appears also to form a link
between the typical Buzzards and the genera Rupornis and
Butastur, and it especially bears a strong general resemblance
in its markings: to one species of the latter genus, Butastur
indicus of Mr. Sharpe’s work.

Buteo latissimus has hitherto been usually known by the
specific name of “pennsylvanicus;’”’ but Mr. Sharpe has adopted
for it in preference that of “ Jatissimus,’ and has favoured

“ Wilson first named Accipiter fuscus ‘ Falco pennsylvanicus.’
He subsequently gave the same name to the Buzzard; but
afterwards finding his mistake in naming two birds thus, he
himself altered that of the Buzzard to ‘ Falco latissimus.’ This
must be the name, as the older one was preoccupied ”*.

In the case of the allied species, for which Mr. Sharpe has
adopted the specific name of “ obsoletus,” he has also dropped
a more accustomed appellation, that of “ swainsoni,’ and in
this instance apparently on insufficient grounds. The name
of Falco obsoletus was given by Gmelin to the “ Plain Falcon ””
of Pennant’s ‘Arctic Zoology ;’? but on reference to the de-
seription of this bird given in’ Pennant’s work, I am decidedly
of opinion that it was taken from an immature specimen
either of Falco gyrfalco or of F. islandicus (including under
the latter-term F. holbelliit of Mr. Sharpe’s work), and I
therefore look upon Buteo swainsoni as the correct name for
the present species. I may add that Mr. Sharpe includes
among the synonyms of Buteo swainsont the ‘ Buzzard
Falcon” of Pennant’s ‘ Arctic Zoology,’ which, so far as
it relates to an American Buzzard, appears to me to refer to
the immature plumage of B. borealis, as it is styled, accord-
ing to Pennant, “The great Hen-hawk,” which is known to
be an appellation of B. borealist.

* [As the application of the name pennsylvanicus has remained prac-
tically unchallenged for about sixty-four years, we trust that Mr. Sharpe’s

cation of the law of priority.— Eb. ]

} I reserve for future consideration, in its proper place, the question of
the specific distinctness of Falco holbelli.

{ Conf. Audubon’s ‘ Ornithological Biography,’ vol. i. p. 270.

me with the following explanation of his reason for doing so:

ee ee ee ee ee een eee eee Ee eS

proposed change will not be adopted, based, as it is, upon a strained appli-

Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres. 235

Mr. Sharpe does not mention in his account of Buteo
swainsoni the difference in coloration which exists between
the adult male and female in their normal state of plumage.
This difference is thus summarized by Mr. Ridgway, in his
paper on the Subgenus Crazirex, to which I have already
referred :—

“ 3. Breast-patch rufous, with darker shaft-streaks ;

2. Breast-patch dark greyish-umber or blackish-brown
(like the back) .”

According to the measurements of this species given by
Mr. Ridgway, a very remarkable disparity exists in the
dimensions of different individuals of the same sex, especially
in the length of the wing from the carpal joint to the tiv of
the primaries. In twenty-two adult males whose dimensions
are given by Mr. Ridgway, the length of this measurement
of the wing varies from 12 inches to 16, and in thirty adult
females from 14°75 to’: 17:25. Having regard to these differ-
ences, it seems to me probable that the investigations of Ame-
rican ornithologists will ultimately result in the discrimi-
nation of two distinct races, a larger and a smaller, both at
present referred to Buteo swainsoni, but not in reality iden-
tical, in which case the smaller race will, I think, be entitled
to the name of Buteo fuliginosus, Sclater.

I may here mention that I have recently remeasured the
type specimen of Buteo fuliginosus in the Norwich Museum,
and make the wing 12:6, and the tarsus 2°05, both these
measurements being slightly different from those given in the
original description of this specimen (P. Z.S. 1858, p. 356).

Mr. Sharpe speaks of the melanistic phase of Buteo swain-
soni as being “fully adult; but if this means that every
individual which lives to be “ fully adult ” attains this state
of plumage, it is a statement in which I cannot concur. It
may possibly be correct as regards the smaller race, which I
am disposed to look upon as separable under the title of B._
fuliginosus ; but in the larger. and commoner form, to which
I would restrict the name of B. swainsoni, melanistic speci-
mens are comparatively so rare that in my opinion they can
only be looked upon as accidental.

R 2

236 Mr. J. H. Gurney’s Notes on

With reference to this question, it may be interesting to
quote the opinion of Dr. Elliott Coues, as expressed at p. 357
of his recent work on the Birds of the North-west. Dr.
Coues there remarks :—“ This dark plumage is an individual
peculiarity, not a normal stage of regular occurrence.”

The remaining American species of the genus Buteo may,
I think, be regarded as belonging to the central group of
that genus, of which B. vulgaris is the type; and in con-
sidering these, I propose first to refer to Buteo borealis and
its western representative, to which. Mr. Sharpe assigns the
subspecific name of “montanus.’ With reference to this
appellation, Messrs. Baird, Brewer, and Ridgway write thus
in vol, il. of the ‘ Land Birds of North America,’ p. 288 :—
“It being certain that the Buteo montanus of Nuttall is
really the B. swainsoni, and not the variety of borealis so
called by Mr. Cassin, it becomes necessary to drop the name
in connexion with the present bird, and transfer it as a
synonym to swainsoni. In its place Mr. Cassin’s name
calurus must be substituted, under which was described the
melanistic condition of the present variety of B. borealis.”

It would therefore appear that Buteo montanus of Mr.
Sharpe’s work should rather bear the name of B. calurus.

To define with precision the distinction between the true
B. borealis of North-eastern America and its darker and
more ferruginous western congener, B. calurus, is a difficult
and, I suspect, an impossible task ; for, great as is the differ-
ence in coloration between typical examples of the two races,
intermediate gradations occur which it is hardly possible to
divide by any satisfactory line of demarkation.

Mr. Sharpe, in his article upon B. calurus, speaks of the
“western birds” as being “ much larger, more powerful, and
darker-plumaged than the eastern, or ordinary specimens of
B. borealis.” | 7

This observation. is undoubtedly correct as to the darker
plumage in the great majority of western specimens, but,
according to the measurements supplied by Messrs. Baird,
Brewer, and Ridgway, can hardly be said to hold good as
regards the alleged larger size of B. calurus.

Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres. 237

The following particulars are given at pp. 283 and 287 of
vol. ii. of the work of the above-named authors on the

Land Birds of North America.

Wing. Tarsus. Middle toe.
inches. inches. inches.
In fifty North-American specimens
of B. borealis :
AEN) oat ae ES ean ear 13°56 -165 =. 2°4*-8'2—-16-1°7
Females ..... ein cee 15°25-17'75 3:15-3:4—1:7--1'8
In forty-six North-American spe-
_cimens of B. calurus :
Pap TU OOS ii oh casts sell k= 13:5 -16 2:9 -3°3 1:7-18
Sixteen females ,....... wee. 16 -17:25 33 -3:4 = 18-195

The authors of the work from which I have extracted the
above dimensions, in endeavouring to define the typical or
eastern B. borealis, describe it, in vol. 11. p. 257, as having
the “ tibiz and lower tail-coverts without transverse bars at
any age ;” and again, at p. 283, as having the “tibie and
lower tail-coverts immaculate.’ In the same page they
remark that. “the true Buteo borealis, as restricted, may
always be distinguished from the var. calurus, its western
representative, by its having the posterior lower parts (tibiae
and lower tail-coverts) entirely free from transverse bars, and
by lacking indications of transverse bars on the tail anterior
to the conspicuous subterminal onet.”’

On the other hand, it is stated at p. 284 of the same
volume, under the head of “ var. borealis, Eastern Red-tail,” ~
that an immature specimen . . . from Philadelphia has the
tibize quite distinctly barred, but less conspicuously than in
young of var. calurus.”

My own observations prove that some specimens from the
eastern regions of North America, the acknowledged home of
the typical B. borealis, do not possess the immaculate tibize
which are considered by the authors above quoted to be a
distinctive attribute of that race; and I therefore believe

* This stands in the original 1:4, which I take to be an obvious mis-~
print.

+ The last character is probably intended to apply only to the adult
bird.

238 Mr. J. H. Gurney’s Notes on

that, though in B. calurus the tibie are never immaculate,
the converse does not always hold good im the case of B.
borealis. The following instances in point may serve to
illustrate this fact :—An adult male from Pennsylvania in the
collection of Mr. Dresser, which in all other respects is a
_ thoroughly typical B. borealis, has the entire hinder surface
of the thighs (and to a certain extent the front also) di-
stinctly barred with transverse fulvous stripes. An immature
specimen in the same collection, also from Pennsylvania, has
the tibize strongly marked with transverse bars of brown,
which are broader than in the adult specimen previously
mentioned, but considerably further apart from each other.
Two other immature specimens in Mr. Dresser’s collection,
both from New Brunswick, also have the tibiz barred with
brown, but less strongly than in the young bird from Penn-
sylvania; in one of these specimens many of the markings
assume the form of triangular spots rather than of bars.
The last-named specimen is very similar to two immature
Canadian examples in the Norwich Museum, one of which
was obtained near Quebec, and both of which have the tibiz
similarly marked.

With regard to the geographical range of the two races,
Mr. Sharpe gives that of B. dorealis as the “ Eastern States of
North America, extending to Cuba, Jamaica, and the West
Indies,”’ and that of B. calurus as ‘‘ Western North America,
throughout Central America, and ranging in winter to the
southernmost parts of the South American continent.”

_ Messrs. Baird, Brewer, and Ridgway define the respective
habitats of these Buzzards somewhat differently. Under the
head of B. borealis they say, “ Hab. Eastern North America,
not in the West Indies, nor west of the Missouri. Localities.
(?) Bahamas (Bryant, Pr. Bost. Soc. 1867, p. 64) ;” and
under the head of B. calurus (p. 286), “Hab. Western region
of North America from the Rocky Mountains to the Pacific,
south mto Mexico, West Indies (Jamaica and Cuba).”

The only West-Indian specimen which I have had an
opportunity of examining is one from Hayti in the Norwich
Museum, an immature bird, which I am disposed to refer to

Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres. 239

B. calurus; but a typical adult B. dorealis is figured in Mr.
Gosse’s ‘Birds of Jamaica’ from a specimen which that
gentleman has kindly informed me “ was shot in Jamaica.”

The Norwich Museum contains two adult specimens, one
from Mexico, the other from Guatemala, which. so closely
resemble Mr. Dresser’s adult male from Pennsylvania that I
cannot do otherwise than refer them to B. borealis ; and the
same collection contains a still more typical example of the
same race, which is said to have been obtained in Chili, as
well as an adult male from Florida, which lived for some
years in my possession, and which exhibits markings and
coloration of such a thoroughly intermediate character that I
feel doubtful whether to consider it an example of B. borealis
or of B. calurus.

I may add that the same collection contains unmistakable
specimens of B. calurus from Mexico, both normal and
melanistic, and one of the latter from Central America,
which I believe was obtained as far south.as Panama.

Mr. Sharpe, in the addenda to his volume, briefly refers at
p. 458 to the descriptions given in Messrs. Baird, Brewer,
and Ridgway’s work (vol. 11. pp. 258, 284 & 285) of three
other races of Buzzard more or less nearly allied to B. borealis,
and severally designated as :—‘‘ Buteo krideri, Hoopes,”
habiting “the plains from Minnesota to Texas;” ‘ Buteo
borealis, var. leucasanus, Ridgway,” from the “ peninsula of
Lower California;” and ‘‘ Buteo borealis, var. costaricensis,
Ridgway,” found in ‘ Central America and South-western
Mexico, Costa Rica, Veragua, and Tres Marias Islands.”

Of these three forms I have only seen the last, which
seems to me to be a well-defined race, meriting certainly sub-
specific, and possibly full specific distinction. An adult 2B.
costaricensis in the Norwich Museum from Panama agrees
with the description of the adult plumage given by Messrs.
Baird, Brewer, and Ridgway, with the following exceptions,
which may probably be due to individual variation. The
feathers of the nape are edged with rufous, and the penulti-

‘mate scapulars are similarly, but more broadly, edged; the

lowest scapulars are broadly tipped with fuligmous brown,

240 Mr. J. H. Gurney’s Notes on

above which are narrow bars of that colour alternating with
broad bars of dark grey; the upper tail-coverts are an un-
broken rufous, as is the tail itself, except that it 1s crossed
about half an inch above the tip with a narrow irregular
blackish-brown band, nowhere more than a quarter of an inch
in breadth, and excepting also four very small dark spots
adjacent to the shafts of the middle pair of rectrices.

I proceed to refer to another and very rare species, Buteo
harlani, the type of which (an adult female) is preserved in
the British Museum, and has been fully described by Mr.
Sharpe, who also adds a description of the young plumage ;
but the latter must be cancelled, as Mr. Sharpe informs me
that it was erroneously taken from an immature example of
an allied species*.

In consequence of this error, I think it desirable to insert
a description of a Buzzard obtained by M. Sallé in the
state of Vera Cruz, and preserved in the Norwich Museum,
which I believe to be an immature example of the veritable
B. harlani, though it does not precisely agree with the de-
scription of another immature, but possibly rather more ad-
vanced, specimen from Texas, given by Messrs. Baird, Brewer,
and Ridgway in vol. i. of their work, p. 294.

The following are the principal measurements of this
specimen :—

inches.
Giller droni: Care. o.i.fe crt tenes eet as oe 1
W tpp front Carpal qomnt 9. ois. soles ee oa 16
POTsUs yee hs Oe Sele oe ee ee Ee ete 2°5
Space between the tip of the tibial feathers and
the base of the toe@.y fakes ana eet ai ae 0:3
Middle toGsasat. is stk abeeuetielaere sh apiats manor be

The upper surface of the head is dark brown, with the
bases of the feathers shghtly showing white on the forehead
adjoining the cere, and also about the occiput; ear-coverts
dark brown, longitudinally streaked with brownish-black ;
chin and upper throat similarly streaked on a white ground ;
the entire remainder of the upper surface (excepting the
quill-feathers of the wings and tail) similar to the upper

* (Cf. Ibis, 1874, p. 314,—Ep. ]

Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres. 241

surface of the head, but without any intermixture of white ;
the lower scapulars have, however, concealed broad transverse
bars of greyish-brown; similar concealed bars are on the
inner webs of the quill-feathers of the wing, the remaining
parts of these quills being blackish-brown, with very narrow
paler tips; these transverse bars are paler and more con-
spicuous on the under than on the upper surface of the
primaries ; the upper tail-coverts (except the central feathers)
are transversely barred with faint markings of a paler brown
than the remainder of that portion of the plumage ; the upper
surface of the tail is dark grey, crossed by seven bars of
greyish black, of which the lowest is subterminal, with a very
narrow pale edging to the rectrices below it. The under
surface is similar, but paler, and especially so as regards
the grey interspaces between the dark bars. The upper
portion of the breast is like the back, but with very slight
rufous edgings to some of the feathers; the lower part of
the breast resembles the upper, but with broader rufous
edgings to the feathers; and this 1s also the case with the
abdomen, flanks, and thighs, the rufous edgings being
broadest and most conspicuous on the tibial feathers; the
under tail-coverts are ochraceous white, transversely but not
closely barred with rufous-brown, the lowest of these bars
having somewhat the appearance of a line of sagittate spots
rather than of an unbroken bar; the bastard wing is dark
grey, the wing-lining ochraceous white, with dark rufous-
brown shaft-marks on each feather, many of which are in the
form of sagittate spots.

I may add that melanistic examples of B. calurus have
been occasionally mistaken for specimens of B. harlani, from
which, I believe, they may always be distinguished by their
rufous tails, as that portion of the plumage seems, in the case
of B. calurus, to be exempt from a tendency to melanistic
coloration.

There remains but one other North-American species of
the genus Buteo to be noticed, B. cooperi, which Mr. Sharpe
merely refers to in a footnote at page 172 of his work. The
type specimen of this Buzzard was shot in 1855 in Santa-Clara

Dat Se F ca

5 2
SS a
ee

242 Notes on Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres.

Valley, California, and was the only example known up to
the time when Messrs. Baird, Brewer, and Ridgway drew up
the description given of it in the third volume of their work,
which is very full, and is accompanied by a woodcut of the
bird itself, and also by one of the foot and leg in detail. This
account contains the following remark, which it may be use-
ful to transcribe :—‘‘ The nearest ally of this species is the
B. ferox of the Palearctic region, which has exactly the size
and proportions of the present bird, and, in certain stages, a
very similar plumage.” |

Since the article above referred to was written, asecond
specimen of this Buzzard has been obtained: this example
was procured from Denver, in Colorado; and Mr. Ridgway,
who has had the goodness to inform me of its occurrence,
adds that it agrees closely with the type specimen.

Before proceeding to the consideration of the Buzzards of
the Old World, I am desirous to recur to an obscure South-
American form, to which I have already briefly alluded
(anted, p. 69), Buteo unicolor of D’Orbigny, described by that
traveller at page 109 of his ‘Oiseaux de Amérique Méri-
dionale.’

The type specimen, which appears to have been the only
one obtained, was met with by D’Orbigny near Palca, in Bo-
livia, and is still preserved in the Museum of the Jardin des
Plantes at Paris, where it has been recently examined by Mr.
Salvin, who kindly permits me to furnish my readers with
the following notes which he has made respecting it :—

“ Measurements: wing 145 inches, tail 8, tarsus 2:5, mid-
dle toe s. u. 1°3.

“The whole plumage is sooty brown; the forehead on
either side has a small white spot; the tail is barred with
fourteen narrow black bars on a brown ground ; these bars
were counted on the upper side of the middle rectrices, and
the whole fourteen are exposed between the end of.the upper
coverts and the tip of the tail; the upper tail-coverts and the
uropygium were hardly paler than the rest of the back.”

T may supplement the above by the following extract from
D’Orbigny’s original description :—“ 'Toutes les parties su-

On recent Ornithological Progress in New Guinea. 243

périeures et inférieures sont noiritres; la base des plumes
est blanche; du blanc a la base du bec, au derriére de la téte
et au col; les rémiges et les rectrices rayées transversalement
de gris ardoisé; le dessous de l’aile rayé de blanchatre et de
noiratre ; les lignes des rectrices plus étroites ; le dessous au
cdté interne presque blanc ; quelques indices de taches rousses
sur les couvertures inférieures de l’aile et aux cuisses.”’

Correction. I take this opportunity of correcting an error
or misprint in one of my former papers: in ‘ The Ibis,’ 1875,
p- 865, the asterisk in line 6 should be affixed to “ polioce-
phalus,”’ not to “ haplochrous.”

[To be continued. |

XXII.—On Recent Ornithological peas in New Guinea.
By P. L. Scuarer.

In my address last year to the Biological Section of the British
Association at Bristol I gave a short summary of the informa-
tion at that time accessible to us upon the ornithology of New
Guinea. But so much has been added to our knowledge of
this strange land even within the short period that has since
passed that I propose to offer to the readers of this Journal
some supplementary remarks upon the same subject. In
Italy, Germany, and England alike, during the past six
months there have appeared contributions of greater or less
importance towards our knowledge of the Papuan avifauna,
concerning each of which I propose to say a few words.
Commencing with the first-named country, we have an
ornithological letter of Dr. O. Beccari*, the quondam com-
panion of D’Albertis, of the greatest interest, communicated
by our ever active friend Dr. Salvadori. Dr. Beccari dates
from Ternate on the 4th of last August, whither he had

* “TLettera ornitologica di O. Beccari intorno agli Uccelli osservati
durante un suo recente Viaggio alla Nuova Guinea,” Ann. del Mus. Civ.
di St. Nat. di Genova, vol. vii. p. 704 (1875). Iam indebted to Mr. Elwes
for writing out an English translation of this letter, of which I have largely
availed myself.

244, Mr. P. L. Sclater on Recent

just returned from New Guinea. Of this highly success-
ful expedition a full account is given in the third volume
of Cora’s ‘Cosmos,’ from which we extract the following
particulars*. Beccari left Amboyna in the schooner ‘ Deli’
on the 22nd January last year, and arrived at Salawatti
on the 3lst. The next day he crossed to Sorong on the
opposite (western) coast of New Guinea, whence he made an
excursion to Ramoi, and obtained a fine pair of Casuarius
uniappendiculatus. From Sorong he proceeded along the
north coast of New Guinea to Dorei Hum, where he as-
cended the adjoining mountain-range “Gunong Morait”
to a height of about 1200 feet. On the top of the mountain
he shot with his own gun two splendid specimens of Dasy-
ptilus pecqueti, one of the rarest of the Parrots, of which the
exact habitat was until recently quite uncertain. Not being
sufficiently satisfied with the view into the interior from
Gunong Morait, Beccari proceeded some miles further along
the coast, to Has, and again ascended the mountain-range to
the height of about 1000 feet. Thence he descended to the
banks of a new and hitherto quite unknown river, the Wa-
Samson, which appears to drain the south-western slope of
the Arfak Mountains, and runs into the sea near Sorong.
In this excursion the principal rarity obtaimed was Seleucides
alba; but Sericulus aureus, Gymnophaps albertisi, and other
scarce species were seen. Rejoining the schooner at Sorong,
Beccari crossed to Wakkeré, at the south-eastern point of
Waigiou, and remained four days in search of Diphyllodes
wilsoni, of which, on the last day, one of his hunters obtained
a fine male bird. He also obtained information of the exist-
ence here of an Hpimachus, which will perhaps turn out to
be E. ellioti, the habitat of which is unknown; and was told
that the newly discovered Diphyllodes gulielmi LI, is really
from Sorong, and not from Waigiou, as is supposed by Dr.
Meyer. Two days’ voyage from Waigiou brought Beccari to
Havre Dorey, whence, after an excursion to Andai, he again
departed for a tour round the great Bay of Geelvink. From
Dorey he first visited Momi and Warbusi, two places im-

* “Recenti Spedizioni alla Nuova Guinea,” Cosmos, vol, iii. p. 73.

ee ee

;
’
:

Ornithological Progress in New Guinea. 245

mediately to the south. At Momi he bought a small living
Cassowary, apparently of a new species, distinguishable by
having a small median as well as two lateral throat-wattles,
which he proposes to call C. tricarunculatus* from this
feature. It is not true, he observes, that, as Schlegel has
stated, each Cassowary is limited to a certain district. At
Dorey two species are certainly met with, of both of which
he has obtained specimens. At Ansus,.a port in the island
of Jobi to which Beccari proceeded from Warbusi, are like-
wise probably two species t. In Jobi, Beccari also obtained
a series of specimens of Paradisea papuana, slightly differing
from those of the mainland of New Guinea, and examples of
Diphyllodes speciosa, distinguished by their longer bills and
the more brilliant yellow of the wings. These latter are, no
doubt, referable to Mr. Gould’s D. chrysoptera, spoken of
below, of which therefore Jobi is the true patria. . From Jobi
Beccari sailed northwards to Kordo or Korido, and the ad-
joining islet of Sowek, thence westwards to Mafor, where a
fine series of Tanysiptera caroline was obtained, and from
Mafor back to Dorey. From Dorey he made an excursion
into the Arfak Mountains, where he spent a month, first at a
station of about 5000 feet altitude, and then at another of
about 3500 feet, rather lower than the place inhabited by
D’Albertis. Beccari maintains that neither Rosenberg nor
Meyer ever penetrated into these mountains. Rosenberg, he
declares, never got further than the home of Hr. Waelders,
a missionary at Andai, about a kilometre distant from the
coast, although he proudly labelled his birds (as may be seen
by reference to Schlegel’s Catalogues), “Interior of the
northern peninsula of New Guinea.” Of Dr. Meyer, Beccari
tells the same tale; Andai was likewise his furthest point
visited personally. After D’Albertis and Beccari had left

* Ann. Mus. di St. Nat. di Genova, vii. p. 717.

+ One of these Dr. Salvadori describes as new, in a footnote, from a
coloured sketch of Beccari’s, under the name Casuarius occipitalis (op. s. ¢.
p- 17). The other he supposes to be my C. westermanni. But is Dr.
Salvadori sure that his C. occipitalis does not = my C. westermanni?
—P.L.58.

246 Mr. P. L. Sclater on Recent

Andai on the previous occasion, Hr. Waelders sent some
Papuan boys up to Atam, and obtained a collection of bird-
skins, which in March of the following year were acquired
by Dr. Meyer. “It is, therefore, only Italian naturalists
that have had the good fortune to hunt the most rare and
most beautiful Paradise-birds in their native forests.” The
very first day of collecting at Atam, Beccari obtained two
specimens of Hpimachus maximus, two of Astrapia gularis
(only found on the most elevated ridges, and almost always
above 6000 feet in altitude), besides examples of Drepanornis
albertisi, Paradigalla carunculata, Parotia sexsetacea, and
various other wonderful species.

Beccari’s departure from this true naturalist’s Paradise was
hastened by intelligence that the men on his schooner were
sick, and that quarrels had arisen between them and the
natives. Descending to Mansinam on the 18th of July, he
left for Salawatti, and arrived there on the 21st. The 23rd
he proceeded to Batanta, an island lying immediately to the
north of Salawatti, and remained there four days. . Returning
thence to Ternate in haste, on account of the sickness of
his crew, Beccari was able to stop only 30 hours at Koffiao
(called Poppa or Pope on the charts), but obtained thirty
bird-skins in this little-known Moluccan island, amongst
which were those of Tanysiptera ellioti*, a Pitta, and Rhipi-
dura vidua.

The collections amassed during this most successful expe-
dition have not yet arrived in Italy, or at any rate are not yet
worked out. But we are told that they were sufficient to
fill twenty-one cases, of which six contained birds, and that
the Papuan birds exceed 2000 in number. In his ornitho-
logical letter above referred to, Dr. Beccari gives the fol-
lowing details respecting the principal rarities.

“ Having referred to my journey, I will tell you what I
think are the most remarkable in my collection of birds. I
obtained several birds of prey, not including, however, Astur

leucosoma, which is not rare at Mansinam (three specimens -

are in Bruijn’s collection). Of the Owls there are, with mine
* Sharpe’s Mon. pl. 105, where the locality given is “‘ Mysol.”’

SS ee ——
——

- Eee eee ee UL

a eS.

Ornithological Progress in New Guinea. 247

and those of Mr. Bruijn, a good number ; but three species in
his collection are wanting in mine. I did my best to obtain
many specimens of Podargus; but, though not rare, they
are difficult birds to find, as they have the habit of sitting
lengthways on the large branches of trees, and in that posi-
tion are hard to see, as also on account of their colour, which
much resembles the lichen-covered bark of the trees. I
firmly believe that Coracias papuensis is not a Papuan bird ;
but I do not think I can say the same of Eurystomus gularis,
which, if I mistake not*, is a bird common enough in New
Guinea (some specimens are larger and deeper in colour).
Peitops blainvillit is fairly abundant in the mountains from
2000 to 8000 feet ; but it is also found in plains near the sea,
as at Ramoi. I believe that I have found all the Alcedinidee
which are known in New Guinea: among these are several
specimens of Melidora macrorhina, and some of Halcyon
nigrocyanea and of Alcyone pusilla: all these are species
which are not very numerous. Of Tanysiptera nympha I
could only get one specimen. It is not very rare among the
mangroves near Ramoi, and in the low places surrounding it.
On several occasions it was met with by my hunters without
their being able to kill it. It is wanting near Dorey, but
reappears at Rubi, in the south of the Bay of Geelvink, a
locality which seems very interesting, and which I was sorry
not to have visited, because several species which are only
known from Salwatti and Sorong are found there, among
others Seleucides alba. Tanysiptera riedelt 1s common at
Kordo; at Mafor I obtained many splendid specimens of
Tanysiptera caroline. I think I have found all the new
species of Meliphagide recently described from Mount Arfak,
except Myzomela cruentata, one specimen of which is in
Bruijn’s collection. Of Orthonyx nove-guinee I got male
and female; the sexual difference is remarkable. 'The three
species of Hupetes are represented by good specimens. I have
two of Melanopitta lugubris, and several of Pitta rosenbergi,

* Certainly Beccari is mistaken. He doubtless intends to speak of
Eurystomus pacvficus, and perhaps of another blue species, of which I
have seen several specimens.—T. S.

248 Mr. P. L. Sclater on Recent

also of Pitta maforeana, though I stayed a very short time at
Mafor. Sericulus aureus I killed on the same fig-tree near
Atam where D’Albertis obtained the greater part of his
birds. It has much the same habits as a bird of Paradisea, |
lives on fruits, especially on figs; one does not find more

than two or three individuals together, usually only one male

and one female; the young males and females are very dif-

ferent in colour; the iris is clear straw-yellow. It isa very ,
lively and. shy bird; when the male is killed the female and
another, perhaps a young male, return again to their food on
the same tree, and then are seen no more. Although it 1s |
found at an elevation of 3000 feet or more, it seems more
abundant in the hills near the sea, but is always most difficult
to find, because in each of the localities which it frequents
there are only a few pairs. Its song, according to my
hunters, has much resemblance to the ‘zigolio’ of the :
Nectarinias, but rather more strong and sonorous. Only the
crest of feathers on the head is erectile. The Arfaks call it
‘Komeida.’ I have a great series of specimens of Machero- .
rhynchus. There is also a violet-coloured species*. The :
Monachella saxicolina is abundant by the torrents of Arfak, |
but only in those near the sea. I have, however, only a pair
of specimens. I have the three kinds of Todopsis; of T. |
grayz there is a single one in Bruijn’s collection. Of the
genera Rhipidura and Monarcha I think I want several
species; but I have got together a fine series. At Kordo I
obtained Monarcha brehmi. The genera Pachycephala and
Campephaga are very richly represented. Artamus maximus
is very common from 3000 to 5000 feet, and has the same
habits as A. papuensis ; 1t is enough to say that it flies like a
Swallow, and sits on the branches of dead trees, especially in
the middle of plantations. I have only got one or two
specimens, because, through some fatality, I missed all the
shots I fired at this bird. I do not believe that Cracticus

crassirostris is a good species; but you will be able to judge

better from the various specimens you will have to examine.

Gymnocorvus senex 18 a very common bird, and goes in flocks
* Probably this is a new species.—T. 8.

Ornithological Progress in New Guinea. 249

of from eighteen to twenty or more; after the first shot they
become very shy: they are seldom killed by the hunters,
because they look on them as dull and uninteresting birds,
and because they are infested with an immense number of
little parasites, which spread in all directions, and cause a
most unpleasant itching. As to the Paradise-birds, I have
obtained all the species belonging to the region. At Ansus I
got two specimens of Diphyllodes chrysoptera, which seems to
be found also at Amberbaki and elsewhere. It seems most
improbable to me that Diphyllodes gulielmi-tertii should be
found at Waigiou, because the type specimen (which I have
seen) was, if I do not mistake, prepared in the manner of
the Alfuros of New Guinea, and was acquired at Salwatti
from a ‘Bugis Nakoda’ (captain of a Celebes boat), to
whom it had most likely come from Has. It seems to me
hardly probable that the female is the bird that has been
described as such. I have had information of this bird at
Wa-Samson; and it is not improbable that it may also be
found at Salwatti. The Epimachi have been separated from
the other birds of Paradise; but I think this is paradoxical.
The form and length of the beak of Epimachus maximus 1s
most variable; the young males and females are found with
the beak only half the length of that of the adult males and
females. This fact made me think at first that I had found
the female of Epimachus ellioti; but I was mistaken. An
Epimachus seems to be found at Waigiou, and will probably
be E. ellioti; but I was not able to return there as [ had
intended. Epimachus maximus and Astrapia gularis are only
found on the highest and most difficult peaks of Mount
Arfak, nearly always above 6000 feet elevation. Specimens
in dark plumage are common enough; but those which have
attained perfect plumage are rare, perhaps because they take

some years to acquire it. Both of them live on the fruits of

certain Pandanacee, and especially on those of the Freycinetia,

which are epiphytous on the trunks of trees. The irides of the

large Hpimachus are dark brick-red, those of the Astrapia

almost black; the neck-feathers of the latter are erectable,

and expand into a magnificent collar round the head. The
SER, IJL,—VOL, VI. . s

Si bh aie

250 Mr. P. L. Selater on Recent

first day I went out at Atam on June 23, I got both these
species (two specimens of each), besides one Drepanornis
albertisi, three Paradigalle, one Parotia, and several other
wonderful kinds of birds. It was a memorable day, because
I also ascended one of the peaks, and was surprised to find
myself surrounded by four or five species of Vaccinium and
Rhododendron. J also found an Umbellifer (a Drymis) and
various other plants common to the mountains of Java.
There were also some mosses a foot and a half in height.
But I must speak to you of birds, and not let myself be
distracted from the Paradise-birds.

«The Arfaks call Astrapia gularis ‘Haroma, and the adult
Epimachus maximus ‘Kambiloja;’ the young ones and
females: are called ‘ Lessoa.? Drepanornis is well known’ to
the Arfaks under the name of ‘Sagroja;’ it is not very
rare, but difficult to find, because, as the hunters assure me,
it has no peculiar cry, so that it is only met with by chance.
Its inconspicuous colour also makes it difficult to see. It is
partial to places near recent clearings, from 3000 to 5000 feet,
as it has the habit of flying to dead trees and fallen trunks,
about which it finds the insects which form its food. In the
stomachs of the two specimens I dissected I found only
insects of various orders, ants predominating, and the larvee
of a Lepidopterous insect. The iris of the adult male is
violescent brown. I preserved a male which was in bad con-
dition in spirit for anatomical study. As to Paradigalla
carunculata, I shot one from my hut whilst it was eating the
small fleshy fruits of an Urtica. It likes to sit on the tops of
dead and leafless trees, like the Mino dumonti. The finest
ornament of this bird are the wattles, which in the dried skin
lose all their beauty. The upper ones, which are attached one’
on each side of the forehead, are of a yellowish green colour ;
those at the base of the lower mandible are blue, and have a
small patch of orange red beneath. The Arfaks call the
Paradigalla ‘ Happoa.? Of Parotia sexpennis I got one’
adult male alive; but it only lived three days. Its eye; with
the iris azure surrounded by a yellow ring, is extremely
beautiful. The six feathers which ornament the head are

Ornithological Progress in New Guinea, 251

not raised up vertically, but moved backwards and forwards
in a horizontal and oblique direction, and are moved forward
parallel to the sides of the beak. It is the commonest Para-
dise-bird at Mount Arfak; but, as usual, the adult males are
much scarcer than the females and young males.

“ Lophorina atra is rather rarer than Parotia; but I must
tell you that the abundance of fruit-eating birds in a given
locality depends principally on the season at which certain
kinds of fruit are ripe; therefore a species may be common
im a place one month, and become rare or completely dis-
appear in the next, when the season of the fruit on which it
lives has passed.

“Diphyllodes speciosus is also pretty common, and easy to
kill when one has learnt to know its song, which resembles a

- kind of ‘ teia-teia-teia ’ repeated several times with diminish-

ing force. The sound produced by kissing the palm of the
hand is a very good imitation. When once you have heard
the song, if you approach carefully, especially early in the
morning, you will find some small spaces about a yard and a
half in diameter cleared of sticks and leaves, where one or
two males are paying court to a female. The males then

erect all their feathers; the skin of the neck swells up like a

bladder; the head seems like the centre of an aureola,
which is formed beneath by the expanded feathers of the
breast, and above by those of the yellow mantle, which are
carried in a perfectly vertical position and spread like a fan.
I kept a bird of this species alive for some days. It is found
sometimes at little distance from the sea, on the plains,
but perhaps more often on the hills at 1000 to 2000 feet
of elevation, preferring open places and the vicinity of
streams.

“ Diphyllodes wilsoni is almost identical in habits with the
last. I only got one specimen at Waigiou and five at
Batanta, which were found very near the sea. Of both of
these species I have preserved in spirit those which were not
in good plumage.

“ Seleucides alba is one of the Paradise-birds most difficult to
procure. It is common enough at Salwatti; but the natives

252 Mr. P. L. Sclater on Recent

always prevented my hunters from going to the places where
it is easy to shoot. |

“The eggs of Ptilorhis superbus have-been found by one of
Signor Bruijn’s hunters. The nest was in the branches of a
tree called at Ternate ‘ Kaju Tjapilong,’ which is the Calo-
phyllum inophyllum. At present I have not the eggs before
me; so I will write about them more fully another time,
when I have been able to examine the man who found them.

“Of Paradisea rubra I have only got some young specimens
from Waigiou, and others from Batanta, but none in perfect
plumage.

“The form of the trachea of Manucodia keraudreni is most
variable ; and the number of circumvolutions seems to change
with age, and to be a peculiarity of the male. On the labels

-of those examined by me I have marked whether or not they
had the trachea external.

“The Buceros ruficollis of New Guinea has the neck of a
much lighter colour than those from Ceram and Amboyna.

“‘ My collection of Papuan Psittacide is very rich, and nearly
complete. You will find three specimens of Dasyptilus pec-
queti, two of which, females, were killed at Gunon Morait,
near Has; the other, a male, on Mount Arfak. It lives on
fruit, and prefers that of a species of Sterculia, as I noted at
Gunon Morait, tearing the pericarp to get at the seeds. It
often goes in pairs, but sometimes in parties of three or four.
When alone it makes a loud and very harsh cry, which can
be heard at a great distance. Its tongue is not papillose or
brush-like, but callous. It is often kept in confinement, but
does not live long. It is very voracious, and may be fed on
bananas. Sometimes it descends to the plains, but generally
prefers the mountains from 2000 to 3000 feet. It has sucha
tough skin that an ordinary charge of shot has little effect on
it, and it is usually only brought down by a blow on the head
or a broken wing. Most of the living birds, as well .as the
skins prepared by natives, are got by the Ternate merchants
at Salwatti; but all come from Has, and I do not yet know
whether the bird inhabits Salwatti. I was able to get speci-
mens of several kinds of Nasiterna. I shot some myself;

Ornithological Progress in New Guinea. 253

and when one knows their haunts they are not difficult to
find. Their habit is to climb about the trunks of trees and
along the lianas. They are often caught alive by the Papuans
in the hollow trees where they make their nest. Nasiterna
geelvinkiana seems to me very distinct, on account of its spiny
tail.. The species which inhabits Mount Arfak also seems
to be separable. I did not get Cyclopsitta gulielmi-tertit; but
several skins of it are in Bruijn’s collection. Among the
Charmosyne I found C. arfaki common enough. Though it
seems strange, it is nevertheless true, that the green Eclecti
are males of the red ones. I learnt this at Aru from my
hunters ; and the young have the same difference. Is Micro-
glossum alecto different from M. aterrimum?

“* At Kordo I found a most beautiful Centropus. Of Cuculus
leucolophus I got one specimen, and there is another in
Bruijn’s collection. It is one of the rarest birds of the
north-west peninsula of New Guinea. Chrysococcyx meyert,
‘Salvad., seems to be found at Salwatti and at Kordo. If,
however, the specimens from that place do not belong to
another species, they are slightly different.

“‘] paid special attention to the Pigeons, because they are
rarely preserved by the Ternate hunters, being too difficult to
skin, and too good to eat. Besides Péttlonopi bellus, miquelit,
speciosus, musschenbroeckii, ornatus, pectoralis, humeralis, &c.,
I found P. aurantiifrons and another, which I had found at
Aru. One, however, is unknown to me, viz. P. jobiensis, of
which there is one bad skin in Bruijn’s collection. Carpe-
phaga chalconota seems a good species. It is abundant at
Atam ; but I did not preserve many specimens, as it was the
principal resource of my table.

-‘©Of Gymnophaps albertisi I only got two specimens. It is
a very rare species, though Sig. Bruijn’s hunters got it, and
also those of the missionaries at Andai and Dorey. Henico-
phaps albifrons is a scattered species, and in some localities
not very rare, as also Hutrygon terrestris, which is more
common at Salwatti than elsewhere. I really think that
there is more than one species of Chalcophaps. C. stefani is
the commonest; another kind I found at Miosnom and at

254, Mr. P. L. Selater on Recent

Koffiao. A terrestrial Pigeon found at Ansus by Sig. Bruijn’s
hunters, and another very small terrestrial species of Atam>
are both of them on the whole nearest to Chalcophaps, and
probably new. The queen of all the Papuan Pigeons is
Otidiphaps nobilis, which, though rare, is found in various
localities, generally close to the sea. It was seen by my
hunters at Dorey, and is found at Andai and Batanta, and
seems to have been this year discovered at Mysol. On
Mount Arfak it is not rare. It has the habits of a Pheasant,
and is very shy; its note is loud, and resembles that of
Megapodius. I have got two specimens of this bird; the
flesh is white and excellent ; it might be easily introduced
into Europe, as it endures a rather low temperature. Near
my hut at Atam there were a couple, though the morning
temperature was often as low as 10° to11°Cent. It lives on
fleshy fruits, which, in the gizzards of those I examined, be-
longed to a Myrtaceous plant and to a Syzygium, and were
mixed with many pebbles.

“At Jobi I naturally found Goura victoria, but not so
abundantly as I hoped. It is also found at Kordo and at
Sowek, but not at Miosnom or Mafor. It is certainly in
error that Wallace, ‘Malay Arch.’ ii. 190, cites G. coronata
as an inhabitant of the Aru Islands. I think I told you that
a Goura was killed in the woods near my house at Amboyna,
and a Cassowary near the same place; but I cannot be sure
that they had not been in captivity and had wise to the
woods.

“ Talegallus jobiensis and Megapodius PRT a este are easy
to be distinguished when alive ; but when the skins are dry
you might easily doubt their being good species. I found a
nest of Talegallus or Megapodius at more than 6000 feet
elevation.”

So much for Dr. Beccari’s ornithological letter, one of the
most interesting contributions to our favourite science that I
have ever read. We must now turn to Dr. Salvadori’s
account of Bruijn’s collection, to which frequent reference
has been made by Beccari. This, as Dr. Salvadori informs

Ornithological Progress in New Guinea. 255

us*, consists of 404 skins, belonging to 158 species, mostly
from Halmaheira and New Guinea. Many of the new species
recently described by Meyer and myself from the Arfak
Mountains are contained in it, and there are besides many
novelties of special interest, such as :—Nasiterna bruijni, a new
pigmy Parrot from the Arfak Mountains, making the fourth
of this extraordinary genus; Megalestes albonotatus, a new
form of Muscicapide allied to Philentoma from the same
locality ; and a new Ptilonopus (P. geminus) from Jobi.

We must now pass on to the opposite extremity of New
Guinea, and see what D’Albertis, who has established himself
in a little island off the main coast, called Yule Island+, has
been doing to advance ornithological science. ‘Of D’Albertis’s
adventures we have several accounts :—first, his. letters in
Cora’s ‘ Cosmos,’ in the article already referred to; secondly,
some letters that have been published by Dr. Bennett in the
‘Sydney Morning Herald’ of December 21st last, and of
which Dr. Bennett has kindly sent me a copy; and thirdly,
the account of his first collections in this district {, which has
just been published by Salvadori. D’Albertis travelled by
the Queensland mail from Batavia to Somerset, Cape York.
After some weeks’ sojourn there, he left on the 5th of
March last, and, after touching at various islands in Torres
Straits, arrived at Roro or Yule Island, situated on the
coast of New Guinea at the entrance to Hall Bay (lat.
8° 50' S., long. 146° 32! E.), on the 16th of the same month.
Here he fixed his headquarters for exploring the opposite
mainland, and has already succeeded in sending home several
important collections, and making many noteworthy dis-
coveries. Of his first ornithological exploits we have already

* “Catalogo di una collezione di uccelli del gruppo di Halmaheira e di
varie localita della Papuasia, inviati in dono al Museo Civico di Genova
dal Sig. A. A. Bruijn.’ Per T. Salvadori. Ann. Mus. Civ. Genova, vii.
p. 749 (1875).

+ See letter from D’Albertis in P. Z. S. 1875, p. 580,

t “Catalogo di una colezione di uccelli dell’ Isola Yule e della vicina
costa della penisola orientale della Nuova Guinea raccolti da L. M.
D’Albertis.” Per T. Salvadori e L. M. D’Albertis. Ann. del Mus. Civ.
di Genova, vil. p. 797.

256 * Mr. P. L. Sclater on Recent

an excellent account in the paper above mentioned. The col-
lection contained 222 specimens, belonging to 85 species,
amongst which 9 appear to be new to science. Besides the
novelties there are other species worthy of special notice,
such as further examples of the large bird of prey recertly
described by Salvadori as Harpyopsis nove-guinee *, skins of
Rhipidura leucothorar, hitherto only known from Atam,
and a fine series of Paradisea raggiana, the southern repre-
sentative of P. papuana.

The Crowned Pigeon of this part of New Guinea is cer-
tainly quite distinct from Gowra coronata and G. victoria.
In the present paper Dr. Salvadori refers it to Finsch’s
recently described G. scheepmakeri (P. Z.S. 1875, p. 631,
pl. lxviii.); and such, indeed, was fully my opinion after
examining D’Albertis’s specimens, which I had an oppor-
tunity of doing when in Genoa last autumn. Dr. Salvadori,
however, as he writes to me, has recently changed his opinion,
and has come to the conclusion that D’Albertis’s bird is
distinct, and has proposed to call it after its discoverer. One
striking feature of D’Albertis’s collection is the presence in it
of many birds hitherto only known to occur in Northern
Australia, such as Astur cruentus, Cyanalcyon macleayt,
Lamprococcyx lucidus, Mytagra concinna, Chlamydodera cer-
viniventris, and other well-known species. This might have
been fully expected from the close proximity of the two coasts.

We must now turn to Germany, and see what our Teutonic
brethren have contributed towards our knowledge of the avi-
fauna of New Guinea during the past six months. Dr. A. B.
Meyer, who, since his return from the East, has received the
well-merited appointment of Director of the Royal Zoological
Museum of Dresden, has augurated his rule by the com-
mencement of a new periodical devoted to the illustration of
the collections under his charge+. The first number of this

* Ann. Mus. Civ. vil. p. 682.

+ Mitthleilungen aus dem k. zoologischen Museum zu Dresden; heraus-
gegeben mit Unterstiitzung der Generaldirection der kénig]. Sammlungen
fiir Kunst und Wissenschaft von Dr. A. B. Meyer. Heft I. Dresden:
1875,

Ornithological Progress in New Guinea. 257

journal commences with some ornithological contributions
from the editor’s pen. The newly discovered Bird of Para-
dise, Diphyllodes gulielmi-tertii, is first described, and figured
in a plate to which we cannot accord much praise. Dr.
Beccari’s doubts about the true habitat of this species have
already been alluded to. Dr. Meyer gives it as Waigiou; but
Dr. Beccari believes the species to be from Salawatti or the ad-
jacent district of New Guinea. Then follow descriptions of
four new Papuan birds, two of which are of great interest
as belonging to the northern genera Parus and Budytes. The
discovery of these forms in the Arfak Mountains is of special
interest when taken in connexion with Beccari’s having
found northern plants (Vaccinium and Rhododendron) on the
same mountains. Other notes upon rare Papuan species,
amongst which are additional remarks upon the red and
green Parrots of the genus Eclectus, terminate Dr. Meyer’s
most acceptable memoir.

Herr von Rosenberg, the German naturalist who made
such splendid collections for the Leyden Museum, has also
lately issued a very interesting account of his two excursions
to New Guinea during his travels in the Eastern Archipelago.
The memoir is in Dutch, and is published at the Hague by
the Geographical and Ethnological Society of the Nether-
lands Indies*. Herr von Rosenberg’s first journey to New
Guinea was at the end of 1868, when he left Ternate in the
month of December, and went to Sorong and Dorey. Thence
he made an excursion to the islands in the Bay of Geelvink,
Soek, Biak, Mefoor, and Jobie, or “‘ Jappen,”’ as he terms it,
and returned to Ternate in July 1869. The second visit to
New Guinea was made in 1870, when large collections were
made at Andai, and Herr von Rosenberg’s hunters penetrated
into the Arfak Mountains, and obtained the many novelties
which were described by Prof. Schlegel in his ‘ Obser-

* Reistochten naar de Geelvinkbaai op Nieuw-Guinea in de Jaren
1869 en 1870 door C. B. H. von Rosenberg, ambtenaar belast met weten-
schappelijke onderzoekingen Nederlandsch-Indie. Uitgegeven door her _
Koninklijk Instituut voor de Taal-, Land-, en Volkenkunde van Neder-
landsch-Indie. Met Kaarten en Afbeeldingen. ‘SGravenhage: Martinus
Nighoff. 1875, 1 vol. 4to, pp. 154. *

wee

258 On Recent Ornithological Progress in New Guinea.

vations Zoologiques.’ A number of nicely drawn lithographic
plates accompany the work, amongst which are reduced
coloured figures of Tanysiptera caroline, T. riedeli, Ptilopus
speciosus, Trichoglossus rosenbergi, Pachycephala schlegeli,
and Myzomela rosenbergi, all new birds discovered during
these two journeys. There is also a coloured figure of the
head of Casuarius papuanus (which may perhaps after all
turn out to be not different from C. westermanni, nobis*),

and an outline of the head of Drepanornis albertisi under

Hr. von Rosenberg’s name of ‘‘ Epimachus veithii,’ which,
as I have already pointed out in this Journal (‘ Ibis,’ 1874,
p. 187), has no real claim to priority. Finally, there is a
useful chart of the Bay of Geelvink and its islands.

There remains now to be noticed what has been done in
this country since last August towards the elucidation of the
Papuan avifauna. Mr. Gould, having long since completed
his ‘Supplement to the Birds of Australia,’ has now com-
menced a second supplement to his great work, in con-
junction with a series of illustrations of the birds’ of New
Guinea and the adjacent islands}. Of this the first two
parts have appeared, one dated 1875, and the other 1876.
They contain life-sized figures in Mr. Gould’s usual style, of
the following species :—

Parr I. (1875).

Peltops blainvillii. New Guinea.

Parotia sexpennis. New Guinea.

Drepanornis albertisi. New Guinea.

Ailurcedus melanotis. Papuan Islands.

—— arfakianus. Arfak Mountains.

maculosus. Queensland.

—— buccoides. New Guinea and Waigiou.

Climacteris placens. New Guinea.

Aprosmictus insignissimus. Darling Downs, Queensland.
Cyclopsitta maccoyi. Rockingham Bay, Queensland.

* Cf. P.Z.S. 1875, p. 84. -
+ The Birds of New Guinea and the adjacent Papuan Islands, in-

cluding any new species that may be discovered in Australia. By John
Gould, F.R.S. &. PartsI.& Ul. Folio. 1875-76.

Notes on a Collection of Birds from the New Hebrides. 259

Collocalia terree-regine. Rockingham Bay, Queensland.
Xerophila pectoralis. Port Augusta, S. Australia.
Sericornis minimus. Australia.

Part II. (1876).

Charmosyna papuensis. Atam, New Guinea.

Diphyllodes gulielmi-tertii. Mountains of Eastern Waigiou.
speciosa. New Guinea.

chrysoptera. Waigiou.

Pitta maxima. Gilolo.

Melampitta lugubris. New Guinea.

_Campephaga strenua. Atam, Arfak Mountains.

Melithreptus letior. Australia.

Ptilotis frenata. Cardwell district, Queensland,
flavostriata. Rockingham Bay, Queensland.
Rhipidura dryas. Australia (North-western).
Ptilonopus nanus. Triton Bay, New Guinea: Mysol.
Amytis goyderi. S. Australia.

The only other English work bearing upon New Guinea that
-has lately appeared is Captain Moresby’s account of his
surveys of the south-eastern and northern coasts*. There is
nothing strictly ornithological in this volume; but it will be
read with interest by those who study the fauna of Papua as
giving accurate geographical details about many little-known
localities, and as containing the only map we know of in
which “ Yule Island,” D’Albertis’s headquarters, is correctly
marked.

XXIII.—WNotes on a Collection of Birds from the New
Hebrides. By H. B. Tristram, F.R.S.

I nave lately received, through the kindness of Rev. J.
Inglis, who has been for many years a missionary at Anei-
teum, in the New Hebrides, a small consignment of birds and
eggs collected at Aneiteum, Aniwa, and Erromanga. It may
be of some little interest to give a list of the collection, inas-

* Discoveries and Surveys in New Guinea and the D’Entrecasteaux
Islands, a cruise in Polynesia and visits to the Pearl-shelling stations in
‘Torres Straits of H.M.S. ‘Basilisk.’ By Captain John Moresby, R.N.
London: Murray. 1876. 1 vol. 8vo.

260 —- Canon Tristram on a Collection of

much as I am not aware of the existence of any separate
paper on the avifauna of this group.

Unfortunately the box was about a year on its way to me,
and the greater part of the contents, especiaily the parcel
from Erromanga, have been utterly destroyed by damp and
sea-water—so much so that many of the specimens are
reduced to a mass of pulp, and utterly unrecognizable. Of
those that have escaped utter destruction there seem to be
twenty-seven species; only one, however, of these is new to
science.

1. Srrrx pELicatuua, Gould.

The collection contains two specimens, with the remark,
“lives in woods and not much seen. Native name ‘ Nalith-
mot.’” ‘The specimens no way vary from others | possess from
Australia, Fiji, and the Samoa Islands. I may mention in
passing that, though the Pacific specimens I have seen are
for the most part of a much purer white on the lower surface
than the British Strix flammea, yet one from Samoa is as
much spotted as many English specimens. ‘The specimens
are from Aneiteum.

2. CoLLOcALIA URoPYGIALIS, G, R. Gray.

This is one of the brightest-coloured species of the group.
The whole upper surface has a fine resplendent sheen; and
the pure white rump is very conspicuous. The lower surface
is white slightly mottled with grey. The bird is figured in
Brenchley’s ‘Cruise of the Curacoa.’ There are specimens
from Aneiteum and Aniwa; and it is stated to be plentiful.
Native name “ Jumat-juma.” :

~ 8. Hatcyon suuia, Heine.

Of this pretty Kingfisher there are specimens from Erro-
manga, Aneiteum, and Aniwa, It would seem to be one of
the most abundant species in the group. There are speci-
mens of the young as well as of the adult, corresponding well
with Mr. Sharpe’s figure in his “ Alcedinidz,” excepting that
the collar is of a deeper chestnut and very clearly defined.
Mr. Inglis merely states of it that it lives near the shore, and
is known to the natives of Aneiteum as “ Nedeng.” °

|
:
F
:
;
2
-

Birds from the New Hebrides. — 261

4, Haucyon sanctus, Vig. & Horsf.

A pair of this species are in the collection, obtained at
Aneiteum ; the first authentic instance of the New Hebrides
as a habitat for this Kingfisher, though Mr. Sharpe observes
that Mr. G. R. Gray has given them as one of its localities.
Both my specimens are adult, and have not the slightest
tinge of cinnamon on the plumage. The under wing-coverts
are pure white, while in H. julie they are always rich cinna-
mon; the upper wing-coverts and back are also darker than
in that species.

5. Myzometa carpinaLis (Forst.).

Of this brilliant little Honeybird there are several speci-
mens both from Aneiteum and Aniwa, in various stages of
plumage. Gray’s description, in his ‘ Catalogue of the Birds
of the Tropical Islands of the Pacific,’ of an immature speci-
men is rather applicable to the female. The adult male is
very like M. nigriventris, Peale, from Samoa, but larger, with
much more scarlet on the back, and the rich scarlet of the
breast not extending so far down.

The female is smaller than the male by ‘2 inch, and the
wing by ‘15. It has only red on the forehead and throat, and
a faint tinge of red on the occiput and rump. The natives
seem to imagine it a distinct species, calling the male at
Aneiteum “Inhenaug,” at Aniwa ‘“Ta-manume,” and the
male on the former island “ Inyara,” at the latter place
“Ta-wenwene.” <A nest from Aniwa attributed to this bird
is a very neat structure, reminding me somewhat of the nest
of a Drymeca, small, compact, and well finished; the outer
portion of cocoanut fibres, and the lining of very fine vege-
table fibre or rootlets. Eggs, said to be those of Myzomela
by the natives, are pale blue; but they are doubtless those of
Zosterons, and were not identified by my kind and careful
correspondent or his friend Mr. Paton.

These birds resort much to the gardens, sucking the flowers.

6. Myzome La ?
Specimens too much damaged for identification, but a very

much smaller species than the above.

262 Canon Tristram on a Collection of

7. ZOSTEROPS FLAVIFRONS (Lath.).

This, the largest and finest of the White-eyes with which I
| am acquainted, is stated to be very plentiful about gardens.
| i I have it both from Aneiteum and Aniwa. ‘The species is
if most remarkable for the great size of its bill. The nests sent
me resemble exactly those of Zosterops flaviceps as described
by Mr. Layard (not by Finsch and Hartlaub), suspended
neatly in the angle of two horizontal twigs by loops of fibrous
rootlets, and composed throughout of fibres, fine roots, and
cobwebs. The eggs, pale turquoise-blue, like those of the
whole genus without exception, are of course much larger
than any of their congeners in my collection. Native name
at Aneiteum “Inheleng,” at Aniwa “Tafurusiu.” Nests
taken 24th October and 14th November.

8. Prerroica sIMILis, G. R. G.

There is a pair of this pretty little bird from Aneiteum in
the collection. It is very like P. pusilla of Samoa, but is
larger, and the male has the throat dark brown instead of
black. Native name “ Katamal.”

9. RuHIPIDURA, sp. ?

One specimen of an undoubted Rhipidura was in the
Erromanga collection, but so utterly decayed that it crumbled
to a mass of feathers at once, and there was no possibility of
identifying it. This is the more disappointing as the species
given by Forster as from the New Hebrides seems to be as
yet undecided. One egg out of three came safely, and is
precisely like those in my collection of R. albiscapa from
Australia, and very distinct from any other Flycatcher’s.

I may mention that, while the skins arrived in such
deplorable condition, the nest and eggs, in a tight box
within, were unharmed by damp or water, which had pene-
trated every thing else.

10. Myzacra MELANURA, G. R. Gray.

From Aneiteum and Aniwa. The glossy black throat and
breast of the male strikingly contrasts with the rich chestnut
of the female. There are two nests, each with eggs, from
Aniwa. The nests are most peculiar, very like those of M.

Birds from the New Hebrides. 263

castanewentris described by Mr. Layard, P. Z. S. 1875, p. 435,
but more coarsely lined with merely rough grasses and fibres.
Outside they are covered with small circular patches of some
lichen like fish-scales, and pure white, as though to make the
nest appear like a knot grown over with lichen. I fancy
Mr. Layard’s informant was mistaken in supposing the eggs
of the HF iji species to be blue, as those from Aniwa are re-
markable for their peculiarity. They are, to my eye, the
most handsome of any Flycatcher’s, of a pallid clay-colour,
with a broad belt of blotches, almost a mass of dark umber,
forming a zone near the thick end of the shell. The rest of
the surface is unspotted, They approach in coloration and
character the eggs of the American Pyrocephalus rubineus.
The native name at Aneiteum is “ Laknuh,” at Aniwa “ Ma-
nusa.” Both nests taken 24th October, containing one three,
the other two eggs.

11. PacnycrrHaLa cHLorurRa, G. R. Gray.

One specimen from Aneiteum. Native name ‘“ Inman-
atahing.”’

12. CAMPEPHAGA CALEDONICA (Gm.).

One specimen from Erromanga.

13. Latace navia (Forst.) ?

There is one specimen of a Lalage from Aneiteum, but so
decayed that I cannot with certainty decide the species. It
seems, however, to agree with Gray’s description, P. Z.8.
1859, p. 163. |

14. TricHOGLossus MASSEN#, Bp.

This beautiful Parrakeet is stated by Mr. erate to live in
small flocks in the tops of the cocoanut-trees. There are a
pair in the collection from Aneiteum, where it is known to
the natives as “ Kula.” There is a very accurate-figure in
Brenchley’s work, whose specimen was obtained in the Solo-
mon Islands. It is nearly allied to 7. cyanogrammus from
Bouru, but may be at once distinguished by the peculiar
bronze copper-colour of the occiput and throat.

15. Carpopuaaa PaciFrica (Gm.) ?
One specimen of a Carpophaga from Erromanga has arrived

Canon Tristram on a Collection of

in a condition which renders it impossible to identify it
satisfactorily. So far, however, as it can be made out it
agrees with Bonaparte’s description of C. pacifica, which is
stated to occur in the New Hebrides.

16. Macropyeta, sp. ?

A skin of some species of this group occurs from Anei-
teum in a condition too much damaged by damp to enable
me to identify it. It is one of the smaller species of this
genus, and known to the natives as “ Inman-aleng.”’

17. CHALCOPHAPS CHRYSOCHLORA, Gould.

_ Mr. R. B. Sharpe has kindly identified for me this species,
of which J have the remains of several specimens. They are
from Aneiteum, where Mr. Inglis: states the bird is very
plentiful. Its native name is “ Naloupa.” It seems to have
considerably more white on the shoulder than have Australian
specimens. There is also a specimen from Aniwa, where the
natives know it as ‘‘Tafoitu.” Eggs sent along with it are
considerably smaller than those of our Turtledove, and are
cream-colour instead of white, in this resembling Geotrygon.

18. Pritonorus ereyi, G. R. Gray.

A specimen of this beautiful Pigeon is sent by Mr. Paton
from Aniwa, where it is known as “ Ta-foikuku.” He also
sends two eggs, taken on 24th October. They are a trifle
smaller than those of the species last named, and are of a
dark cream-colour, darker than Cina capensis. It will be
interesting to ascertain if this peculiarity is shared by any
other Ptilonopus, those Mr. Layard has found in Fiji being
pure white.

19. CHaRApDRIUs FULVUs, Gm.

. Abundant on the shore. Sent in various stages of plumage.
Native name at Aniwa “Ta-kuriri,” at Aneiteum the small
“ Nagag.”’

-- 20. Limosa BAvERI, Naum.
Lives on the shore, and is very plentiful. Native name large

of winter plumage.

“Nagag’ at Aneiteum. The specimens are in various states —

Birds from the New Hebrides. 265

21. Limosa MELANUROIDES, Gould?

One specimen from Aniwa, among seven of the fan-tailed
species, is rather smaller, and with the tail not barred, yet
not black, but dark brown. I believe, therefore, that it is an
immature bird of Mr. Gould’s L. melanuroides.

22. ARDEA sAcRA, Gm.

Two specimens in good state from Aneiteum are in the
collection. ‘They are considerably larger than A. sacra from
Samoa. I observe that they sustain the remarks made by
G. R. Gray, who would have separated them under his name
of A. albolineata, P.Z.S. 1859, p. 166. The difference seems
to be too slight and uncertain on which to found a species ;
but if not two species, there are certainly two races in these
Pacific Islands, a larger and a smaller, and the two do not
appear to be found in the same locality anywhere. Native
name ‘“Inpaing.” Mr. Inglis observes that it wades in the
sea rather than in streams.

23. RaLius PHILIPPENSIS, L.
From Aneiteum. Native name “Nebutch.” “ Note.
Lives in the bush, and flies little.”

24. PoRPHYRIO ANEITEUMENSIS, Sp. NOv.

Long. tot. 18°5, ale a carp. 9°4, caud. 3°6, rostr. a rict. 1:35,
mand. super. cum scuta 2°4, tars. 3°5, dig. med. cum
ungue 3°75, Coloribus non aliter distributis quam in
P. indico et P. vitiensi, sed dorso non tam lete czerules-
cente quam in P. indico.

I have been induced to describe the Purple Gallinule of
the New Hebrides as a new species, since I cannot identify it
by any of the descriptions within my reach. I think a con-
fusion has arisen in this group owing to an error in Cassin’s
‘Ornithology of the United States Exploring Expedition.’
He there gives P. indicus as the species found in Samoa; but
in a footnote he gives measurements corresponding exactly
with those I have given above for the New-Hebrides bird.
Now these measurements do not agree in the least with those
of true P. indicus, as correctly given by Finsch and Hartlaub
and by Schlegel, and proved by specimens before me from
Sumatra and Macassar.

SER, III.—VOL. VI. T

= es

ee RE

266 Ona Collection of Birds from the New Hebrides.

I have on the table four Samoan specimens. Their mea-
surements run all slightly smaller than those of P. indicus ; and
besides they have not the suffused blue on the back, which is
black-brown instead of blue-black. The Samoan bird is, I
think, distinct from the P. indicus. Whether it be distinct
from P. vitiensis, Peale, I cannot say, not having a specimen
from the Fijis. Peale distinctly states that P. vitiensis 1s
much smaller than the Samoan bird; and he gives measure-
ments which accord pretty nearly with my Samoan specimens.
Probably, then, Mr. Whitmee is correct in his conjecture that
his bird is P. vitiensis (Ibis, 1875, p. 446); but it is, perhaps,
a little larger. My solution of the confusion is that Cassin
got hold of a specimen of the species I am now describing,
which was erroneously marked as from Samoa, and identified
it as P. indicus, the real Samoan bird being very close to
that species.

The New- Hebrides bird is halfway between P. indicus and
the large P. melanotus of Australia and New Zealand, both
in size and coloration. : |

Mr. Inglis writes of its habits that it lives inland, and eats
taro and sugar-cane (as Mr. Layard says of the Fiji bird).
It is known to the natives as “ In-nga.”

25. ANnovus stotipvus, L.
From Aneiteum. Native name “ Ketipup.”

26. Gy@is CANDIDA, Sparrm.
From Aniwa.

27. PHAETON RUBRICAUDA, Bodd.

From Aneiteum, where its tail-feathers are much prized
by the natives, who call it “ Intoneg.”

Besides these, there are memoranda in Mr. Inglis’s letter
of three other species of birds which have perished in transit.
There are also several nests bearing numbers corresponding
to those of birds which have perished. One is probably the
nest of the Rhipidura, a very fine Flycatcher-structure resting
on two horizontal branches. Another I can only refer to My-
zomela. Itis exceedingly fine, compact, and tough, of a con-
sistency between a Humming-bird’s and a Tree-wasp’s nest.

Count Salvadori on some New-Guinea Birds. 267

It is built among some twigs, after the fashion of a Long-tailed
Titmouse’s, and has asingular pendent tail, giving it the form
of an inverted cone or jelly-bag. The inside is lined with
very fine rootlets; and the outside, the rim, and halfway
down the interior are, as it were, solidly felted with cobwebs.
In it are the fragments of two eggs, of a pinky white ground,
covered with brown blotches. Outside diameter of nest
2¢ inches, depth inside 1}, from rim to end of tail 44.

XXIV.—On Sericulus xanthogaster, Schl., and Xanthomelus
aureus (Linn.). By T. Satvaport, C.M.Z.S8.

Among the birds from New Guinea collected by D’Albertis,
Beccari, and Bruijn’s hunters, or obtained by them from the
natives, are seven specimens (six males quite adult, and one
in transitional plumage) of Xanthomelus aureus, and two
birds which quite agree with Schlegel’s Sericulus xantho-
gaster, figured by Elliot in his ‘Monograph of the birds of
Paradise’ under the name of Chlamydodera xanthogastra ;
with the latter name they have been mentioned by Mr. Sclater
(P. Z.S. 1873, p. 697).

Working lately at Xanthomelus aureus for my book on the
birds of New Guinea, I have been struck by the fact that the
male in transitional plumage, mentioned above, shows cha-
racters intermediate between those of the fully adult X.
aureus and those of the so-called Sericulus xanthogaster ; and
having gone through the subject, I have arrived at the con-
clusion, which I think will be rather unexpected, that Seri-
culus xanthogaster is the young of Xanthomelus aureus.

The specimen in transitional plumage which has led me
to this conclusion is, unfortunately, a native skin, without
feet: it has the upper part of the head orange-red; some of
the feathers round the eyes and on the sides of the head are
black; on the throat there are a few blackish feathers; all
the upper parts, the wings and the tail, from above, included,
are olive-brown, with a slight yellow tinge on the upper tail-
coverts ; the feathers of the mantle are rather elongated and

T 2

268 Count Salvadori on some New-Guinea Birds.

abundant, and each of them has a concealed mesial yellow
line, which only appears on moving the feathers; the greater
upper wing-coverts and the scapulars have yellowish tips ; the
quills are olive-brown above, and have a great part of the
inner web towards the base yellow; the shafts of both the
remiges and rectrices are brown above and yellow underneath ;
the underparts are yellow, with a slight tinge of olive on the
front neck, especially on the middle of the feathers; the bill
is black, a little paler at the base.

Now it is quite evident that this specimen has several cha-
racters of the adult males of Xanthomelus aureus, and others
of the bird named Sericulus xanthogaster. In common with
X. aureus it has the head above orange-red, some black fea-
thers on the sides of the head and on the throat; and the
feathers of the mantle, although of an olive-brown colour,
begin to show the shape of those of the adult males. From
these characters it appears quite certain that the above-men-
tioned bird is a male of X. aureus in transitional plumage.

The characters in common with Sericulus xanthogaster are
the olive-brown colour of the upper parts, the long and nar-
row concealed yellow stripes on the middle of the feathers of
the mantle, the similar colouring of the quills, olive-brown
externally, and with the greater part of the inner web yellow,
the shafts of the remiges and of the rectrices brown above,
yellow underneath, and the reddish or fulvous colour of the
sides of the head.

Turning now to the two specimens collected by Signor
D’Albertis, which agree with Sericulus xanthogaster, one of
them seems a little older than the other: in the younger one
the feathers of the mantle are shorter, with the concealed
mesial yellow marks narrower, the throat is pure fulvous red-
dish, while in the other it is tinged with yellow; and in the
former the lower part of the front neck and upper part of the
breast have dark irregular lines or bands, as is shown in
Elliot’s figure of Chlamydodera xanthogastra, while in -the
other specimen those bands have already disappeared, and
only the middle of each feather of the same region appears a |
little darker.

Count Salvadori on some New-Guinea Birds. 269

It is worth while to mention that in the plate 25 dis of
Lesson’s ‘Oiseaux de Paradis’ a male is figured not quite
adult (but older than the specimen in transitional plumage,
which I have described above, having the orange mantle and
the black throat), which has the wings olive-brown, and on
the upper part of the breast those dark marks which have been
described in Sericulus xanthogaster ; besides, in that plate of
Lesson’s the shafts of the tail-feathers are yellow under-
neath.

If now I arrange in a series, first the two specimens col-
lected by D’ Albertis (which agree with Sericulus canthogaster),
first the younger one and then the older—second, the speci-
men of Xanthomelus aureus in transitional plumage, which I
have described above—third, the figure of X. aureus, which
is to be found in the plate 25 dis of Lesson’s work—and last
the fully adult males of X. aureus, we have a gradual series,
which demonstrate most clearly that Sericulus xanthogaster,
Schleg., is nothing else than the young bird of X. aureus.

I wish also to mention that in all these specimens the bill,
the feet, the wings, and the tail have exactly the same shape
and dimensions. The bill in the younger specimen of the
two referable to Sericulus xanthogaster is nearly all black, a
little paler at the base of the mandible underneath ; in the
other, which is a little older, the base of the bill is all round
a little paler; in the young male in transitional plumage the
base of the bill is more decidedly pale, but not so whitish as
in the adult birds.

I think that we can now fix the systematic position of
Xanthomelus aureus more satisfactorily than it has been done
hitherto.

The young specimens of this species, which have been
named Sericulus xanthogaster, show most certainly, as has
been pointed out by Mr. Ellot, a great likeness to some
species of the genus Chlamydodera; and, besides, when we
consider the characters of the bill, of the feet, and of the
wings of the adult birds of Xanthomelus aureus, we must ad-
mit that there is a great similitude between this most bril-
liant bird and the somewhat more plain ones of the genus

270 Recently published Ornithological Works.

Chlamydodera, near to which I think that X. aureus must
find its place. |

Also Signor Beccari, in his “ Lettera Ornitologica”’? re-
cently published*, remarks that X. aureus, or Sericulus aureus
(as he calls it), has not the habits of the true Birds of Para-
dise. Who knows if, before long, we shall not hear of its
building some kind of bower, like the true Bower-birds ?

As regards the systematic position of X. aureus, I wish
to point out that while Mr. Elliot has very nearly approached
the truth by placing Sericulus xanthogaster with the Chla-
mydodere, Prof. Schlegel seems to have better seen another
side of the question, placing his S. xanthogaster in the same
genus with Sericulus aureus.

In conclusion, [ think we have good reasons to believe :—
lst, that the bird called Sericulus xanthogaster, Schleg., is
the young of Xanthomelus aureus; 2nd, that X. aureus does
not belong to the true Paradiseine, but to the less typical
group of the Paradiseidee, which Mr. Elliot has called Tetro-
narchine, and others call Ptilorhynchine. It seems also
that Prof. Sundevall is of the same opinion, as in the last-
named group he includes the genus Sericulus, in which, I
suppose, he comprises Xanthomelus aureus.

Turin, March 18th, 1876.

XXV.—Notices of recently published Ornithological Works.

Since the discontinuance of the “Index of Ornithological
Literature,” begun in 1871 and continued for three years,
we have confined our notices of books to a great extent to
special ornithological works, to the exclusion of papers pub-
lished in current periodicals. We can fairly make an ex-
ception to this rule in the case of the extra number of the
‘Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal,’ published in
August last, and which contains a “ Catalogue of the Mam-
mals and Birds of Burma” by the late E. Blyth.

* Ann. Mus. Civ. di Stor. Nat. di Gen. vii. p. 709 (1875).
+ Journ, As. Soc. Beng. Part Il. Extra Number, August 1875. “ Oata-

Recently published Ornithological Works. 271

The introduction is written by Mr. Grote, and contains a
memoir of Blyth, which will be read with great interest
by his many friends. This memoir is supplemented by a list
of Blyth’s papers in the ‘Journal of the Asiatic Society of
Bengal’ and other journals, which will be found of great use
by those consulting Blyth’s numerous contributions to zoolo-
gical science. The present posthumous work on the mam-
mals and birds of Burma occupied Blyth’s attention for
some time prior to his death, and was, at the time it was
written, destined to form a sketch of the natural history of
Burma to accompany a work then being prepared on that
country by Sir Arthur Phayre. The MS., after Blyth’s
death, was handed over to Mr. Grote, who undertook the
general superintendence of its preparation for the press in
the form in which it ultimately appeared. Mr. Grote invoked
the aid of Lord Walden, Dr. Anderson, and Dr. Dobson to
assist him in his labour of love; and the result is the useful
volume now before us. It is with Lord Walden’s contribu-
tion that we are now concerned.

During the last few years our knowledge of the birds
of Burma has received great accessions from the labours
of several competent naturalists and collectors, Mr. Davison,
Mr. Oates, Major Lloyd, Captain Feilden, and Lieu-
tenant Wardlaw Ramsay. ‘The collections of the first two
gentlemen passed into the hands of Mr. Hume; and cata-
logues of them have been published in ‘Stray leathers.’
The specimens obtained by Major Lloyd, Captain Feilden,
and Lieut. Ramsay came into Lord Walden’s possession,
and enabled him considerably to supplement Blyth’s original
list, into which he has also incorporated the species ob-
tained for Mr. Hume. ‘These materials have also supplied
much useful information as regards the habitats of most of the
species mentioned, and also suggested some valuable notes on
their nomenclature.

The richness of Burma as regards its birds may be gathered

logue of the Mammals and Birds of Burma. By the late E. Blyth,
O.M.Z.S. &c. With a Memoir and Portrait of the Author.” 8vo,
pp. 167. Hertford: 1875.

272 Recently published Ornithological Works.

from the fact of no less than 660 species being catalogued
in the present list, a number, considering the limited area
investigated, indicating a bird population of great density,
hardly perhaps surpassed by that of any other portion of the
globe, not even excepting the richer areas of South America.
Lord Walden has not gone into any analyses to show the
relationship of the Burman avifauna to that of the sur-
rounding countries; but his list seems to show that the great
richness of this country in species appears to be due to the
mingling of many Himalayan forms with a number of Ma-
laccan types, which, with a considerable proportion of ‘ auto-
chthones,” together make up the bird population of Burma.
In his final note Lord Walden leads us to expect that con-
siderable additions to this list will be made, both from the side
of the Himalayas and also Malacca—a prediction already in
part fulfilled, judging by some recent additions to the Burman
avifauna communicated by Mr. Hume to his own periodical.

The second part of the new edition of Layard’s ‘ Birds of
South Africa’ reached us in October last, since which time
no further numbers have been issued*.

This work, to which we have already alluded (Ibis, 187 5,
p- 505), is now brought down to nearly the end of the Cuckoos
of the arrangement adopted. As all references are omitted,
it is not easy for us to say what new ornithological matter is
brought forward in this revised edition of the ‘ Birds of South
Africa’; but it seems to us that by far the greater portion of
the additional material is derived from Mr. Ayres’s, Mr. T.
EK. Buckley’s, and Captain Shelley’s articles on South-African
ornithology published in this Journal, and Andersson’s ‘ Birds
of Damara Land,’ edited by Mr. J. H. Gurney, as well as
from papers by Mr. Sharpe himself. Mr. Sharpe, who, we
believe, has the sole charge of seeing this book through the
press, will have an apportunity of supplying his omission of

* The Birds of South Africa. By E. L. Layard, F.Z.S. &. New
edition, thoroughly revised and augmented by R. Bowdler Sharpe, F.L.S.
&c. Large 8vo, pp. 81 to 160, 2 plates. London: Oct. (errore May)
1875,

.
:
;
:
|

Recently published Ornithological Works. 273

references to some extent when, at the completion of the
book, he prepares the preface. A full list and abstract of the
contents of all the papers and books on South-African birds,
inserted there, cannot fail to be useful.

The second volume of the ‘ Catalogue of Birds in the British
Museum ’*, upon which Mr. Sharpe is engaged, was issued
in December last. It includes the whole of the Owls as far
they are at present known. Mr. Sharpe adopts the outline
of the arrangement submitted by the authors of the ‘ Nomen-
clator Avium Neotropicalium’ to Professor Newton when
engaged upon the Owls in his new edition of Yarrell’s ‘ British
Birds, and divides the Striges into Bubonide and Strigide,
the latter containing Stri# and its ally Phodilus, the former

the rest of the Owls. The Bubonide are again subdivided

into two subfamilies, Bubonine and Syrniine, these divi-
sions being based chiefly upon the development of the ear-
opening and the presence or absence of an opercular fold at-
tached to it. |

This, we believe, gives a fairly natural arrangement of the
larger groups of the Striges, as far as they can be determined
from the examination of characters which are chiefly external.
As in his volume on the Accipitres, Mr. Sharpe gives “ keys”
to both genera and species, which add greatly to the utility
of the work, and has devoted much labour and time to
elaborate descriptions of each species, as well as to the
different states or phases of plumage in which they are found.
We regret to think that these descriptions, many of them
exceeding a page in length, are not destined to be much
studied; for the point sought for in determining a species
from Mr. Sharpe’s book will be more readily found in his
“key,” or in the “ observations ” attached to the descriptions,
than in the descriptions themselves. Mr. Sharpe’s difficulties
in this respect are to be traced to the intricate character of
the colouring of the plumage of most Owls, which defies an

* Catalogue of the Striges, or Nocturnal Birds of Prey, in the Collec-

tion of the British Museum. By R. Bowdler Sharpe. 8vo, pp. 325, 14
plates. London: 1875.

274 Recently published Ornithological Works.

adequate description being made so as to convey to a reader
a correct idea of the shades of colour and minute markings
of these birds. Mr. Keulemans’s brush speaks with far more
eloquence on this point, as the fourteen beautiful plates which
accompany this volume show.

The synonymy of each species is given in great detail, and
appears to be very complete. We are glad to notice that in
this volume Mr. Sharpe has succeeded in avoiding any start-
ling changes of names of well-known species, and in this
respect has not followed the precedent of his former one, a
forbearance on his part on which we heartily congratulate ~
him.

Mr. Sharpe has a long task before him, which must neces-
sarily occupy him many years, ere this Catalogue of Birds can
be finished; but we do not doubt his energy to pie setee
what he ae undertaken.

The American expedition to observe the transit of Venus
in Kerguelen’s Island has been the means of producing an
interesting paper on the ornithology of that inhospitable
region from the pen of Dr. J. H. Kidder, the naturalist at-
tached to the expedition. The book is edited by Dr. Coues,
who named Dr. Kidder’s specimens and supplied the syn-
onymy of the species observed*.

This little work is very welcome, containing, as it does,
the first connected account of the birds of Kerguelen’s Island,
though some of its winged inhabitants have been known and
recorded as long ago as the latter part of the last century.
With the single exception of Chionis minor, all the species
observed belong to marine or aquatic families, members of
the Procellariide forming the greater part of the whole
number. In determining these Dr. Cones reopens a subject
which occupied much of his attention some ten years ago

* Contributions to the Natural History of Kerguelen Island, made in
connection with the American Transit-of-Venus Expedition 1874-75.
By J. H. Kidder, M.D., Passed Assistant-Surgeon U.S. Navy. I. Orni-
thology, edited by Dr. Elliot Coues, U.S.A. _8vo, pp. 47. Washington
1876.

Recently published Ornithological Works. 275

(cf. Proc. Acad. Phil. 1864 & 1866). <A species of Zistrelata,
formerly called Gi. grisea, Kuhl, ex Latham, is now described
under the new name G. kidderi, it being clearly shown that the
species in question is not the Procellaria grisea of Gmelin
and Latham. We have lately pointed out (Rowley’s Orn.
Misc. pt. iv.) that the name this bird will have to bear is @.
brevirostris (Less.), an examination of Lesson’s type in Paris
proving, beyond a doubt, the right position of this species ;
and that Bonaparte, in identifying it with P. macroptera,
Smith, was quite wrong. Dr. Coues places the name “stre-
lata inexpectata, Forst.”” (Bonap. Consp. ii. p. 189), as one of
the synonyms of CH. kidderi; but the bird so determined by
Bonaparte (wrongly so no doubt) belongs to another species,
and is identical with Procellaria incerta, Schl. But this is
perhaps hardly the place to discuss the intricate synonymy
of the Petrels, which, we may fairly say, have not their equal
in respect of their nomenclature ; so involved is it, in spite of
Dr. Coues’s meritorious labours in endeavouring to extricate
these birds from this reproach.

Dr. Coues adds critical notes on the nomenclature of many
of the species, which form a valuable contribution to the
work.

Dr. Kidder’s own observations are of great interest ; and he
describes the habits of the birds he saw very fully. As
most of the birds found bred in the island during the stay of
the expedition, ample facilities were afforded for making
copious field-notes, of which Dr. Kidder most amply availed
himself. We must add that the book itself is brought out
under the auspices of the Smithsonian Institution, and forms
one of a series, now in course of publication, intended to
illustrate the collections of natural history and ethnology
belonging to the United States and constituting the National
Museum.

Letters, Announcements, &c.

XX VI.—Letters, Announcements, &c.

The following letters, addressed “To the Editor of ‘The
Ibis,’ ””? have been received :—

Sir,—In ‘The Ibis’ for 1862 (p. 183) the Editor, in re-
viewing a paper by Herr Meves “On the Red Colouring in
Gypaetus,’ suggested that the chemical test by which he
ascertained that the ferruginous tint in the plumage of certain
specimens of the Lammergeier were owing to a “superficial
deposit of oxide of iron on the feathers,” should be applied as
well to the rufous-tinged feathers of the Whoopers and Be-
wick’s Swans. Acting on this hint, I placed, recently, in the
hands of Mr. F. Kitton, of Norwich, well known in connexion
with microscopic investigations, the head of an adult male
Swan, strongly tinged with ferruginous; and the following is
the result of his investigations :-—

“As I anticipated,’ he writes, ‘the colourig-matter is
iron (peroxide, Fe,O,). On testing some of the deeply stained
feathers from the head of the Swan with ferrocyanuret of
potassium, the characteristic deep blue colour immediately
appeared (sesquiferrocyanide of iron). On placing white fea-
thers from the neck in contact with some red-crag débris and
water, they acquired a pale buff tint; and these became blue,
like the red feathers of the head, when treated with the ferro-
cyanuret of potassium. I afterwards mounted some of the
tested feathers in Canada balsam, and examined them with
the. micro-spectroscope, and found that the spectra of the
originally and experimentally stained feathers were identical.
I think you are correct in your surmise that the rufous tint
is produced by contact with ferruginous sand.”

It remains now only to test the water and the subsoil in
localities where Swans are known to exhibit the rufous colour-
ing most vividly; and I may here add that the delicate buff
tint on the white feathers placed by Mr. Kitton in water in
contact with red crag, is particularly interesting, as it cor-
responds exactly with the colouring so often remarked on the
necks of domestic Swans, just so far as they are usually sub-
merged in feeding, occasioned more probably by the water

—eV CF.

———S- er

Letters, Announcements, &c. 277

than by actual contact with the soil. From the above ex-
periments, therefore, I presume that a like cause produces
the same effect of colouring in the case of some Whoopers
and Bewick’s Swans, and on the breasts of some species of
Ducks.
Yours faithfully,
H. STEVENSON.
Norwich, Feb. 18th, 1876.

Turin, February 26th, 1876,
Zoological Museum.

S1xr,—Lord Walden, in his edition of Blyth’s “ Birds of
Burmah”’ (Journ. As. Soc. Beng. xlin. pt. 2, p. 126), speak-
ing of my Cymborhynchus malaccensis, says that he supposes
that I have satisfied myself about the type of Latham’s Great-
billed Tody having a black tail, without white spots. It seems
that his Lordship has overlooked that in my paper on the
genus Cymborhynchus (Atti R. Ac. Sc. Torino, ix. p. 418) I
have said that, from a letter of Herr von Pelzeln, to whom I
had applied for information, I learnt that the type of La-
tham’s species, still preserved in the Museum of Vienna, has
not its own tail. Such being the case, I thought that we could
safely refer to Latham’s species the specimens with the tail
complelely black, as such have been described by subsequent
writers (Raffles, Wagler, and others) ; and, besides, I think
that Latham would have perceived the white spots on the
tail had he described a specimen of my C. malaccensis.

I take this opportunity of mentioning that having just
received the first two parts of Gould’s ‘ Birds of New Guinea,’
I have been rather surprised to find Ptiladela boyeri (G. R.
Gr.) figured under the name of Campephaga strenua, Schleg.,
which is a much larger bird, and also otherwise different. I
will also mention that Diphyllodes speciosa must stand as D.
magnifica, as Pennant gave to this bird the name of Para-
disea magnifica (Faunula indica in Forster’s Zool. Ind. p. 40)
(ex D’Aubent, Pl. Enl. 631) in 1781, two years before Bod-

278 Letters, Announcements, &c.

daert called it P. speciosa. Ought not the credit of having
named D. guglielmi-tertit to be given to Van Musschenbroek,
as is done by Meyer himself?
I remain,
Yours very truly,
| T. Satvapori.

Northrepps, 13th March, 1876.

S1r,—In the late Mr. Blyth’s valuable ‘ Catalogue of Mam-
mals and Birds of Burma,’ recently published by the Asiatic
Society of Bengal, the ornithological portion of which is
edited and enriched with notes by Viscount Walden, the fol-
lowing editorial note occurs at page 62, under the head of
Accipiter virgatus :—‘‘'Thayet Myo (F.). Captain Feilden
was good enough to send me the example here noted, and
which I provisionally identify with A. virgatus. In Mr.
Sharpe’s opinion it may belong to the race named J. steven-
soni by Mr. Gurney; the latter gentleman, however, as will
be seen below, identified, though with doubt, this Thayet-
Myo example as belonging to ‘4. rhodogaster, nearly adult. ”
Through the kindness of Lord Walden I have had a second
opportunity of examining this specimen; and having since I
first saw it, some years since, become better acquainted with
the variations of plumage incident to A. virgatus, I am now
able to state decidedly that it is a male of that species in the
second or intermediate plumage, described by me in ‘ The
Ibis’ for 1875, p. 480. I was quite wrong in supposing that
it might be an example of A. rhodogaster ; and it is equally a
mistake to refer it to A. stevensoni. I may add that this
specimen precisely agrees with one from India which is pre-
served in the Norwich Museum.

I wish also to mention that through the kindness of Pro-
fessor Newton, and of his brother Mr. Edward Newton, I
have had an opportunity of examining a specimen of Circus
macroscelus lately received by the latter gentleman from Ma-
dagascar. The sex of this individual has not been recorded ;
but as its dimensions somewhat exceed those of the type speci-

Letters, Announcements, &c. 279

men, which was ascertained by dissection to be a male, I
think it probable that the present bird is a female; in its
markings and general coloration this example agrees closely
with the type, except that it shows indications of more ad-
vanced plumage on the feathers of the back and on the lower
scapulars, which are slightly tinged with dark grey, also on the
primary-coverts, primaries, secondaries, and bastard wing, all
of which show more or less of a clear grey colouring crossed
with darker transverse bars.

If I am right in considering this specimen a female,
these appearances of incipient grey coloration make it pro-
bable that the two sexes in this Harrier (and probably also.
in the nearly allied C. maillardi) do not differ in plumage
when fully adult.

I now consider that I have examined three Madagascar
specimens of Circus macroscelus, of which the following are
the principal measurements :—

Wing from
carpal joint. Tarsus.
in. In.

Male, immature, type specimen in Norwich

Museum, ede Ibis, 1863, p. 858, & 1875,

Pot (wanes Bbraded) o.. s eed ww nets 15 3°85
Presumed male, adult, in British Museum,

vide Ibis, 1875, p. 280, and Sharpe in

PEA, Oo PEO BGs on eS age F Cee Bas 16:9 3°55
Presumed female, immature, in the collec-
fon-~of Newton i, viii sieht alaae La 17-9 39

A comparison of these measurements with those of the
Joanna and Réunion Harriers, which I have previously re-
corded (anted, p. 129), leads me to believe that the Mada-
gascar and Joanna Harriers are probably identical, whilst
those of Réunion are decidedly smaller; I therefore consider
that the specific name of Circus macroscelus may be conve-
niently retained for the two first, and that of Circus mail-
lardi restricted to the last.

T am, &c.,
J. H. Gurney.

280 Letters, Announcements, &c.

Srr,—In the last issue of ‘Stray Feathers,’ vol. in. p. 418,
Mr. H. E. M. James records the occurrence of Pterocles sene-
gallus and P. arenarius at the south-east corner of the Runn
of Cutch, which he considers to be the most southern point
at which they have been found. P. senegallus, however, occurs
in Kattiawar; for I have skins of a pair shot in that province
and kindly forwarded to me by Captain Hancock. P. are-
narius has also been obtained there; but the skins which should
have reached me long ago have evidently gone astray.

I take the opportunity of adding that Captain Hancock has
also sent me skins of Prinia gracilis, Drymeca jerdoni, Cur-
sorius gallicus, Dromas ardeola, and Graculus melanognathus,
thus adding six species to my list of Kattiawar birds (Ibis,

1873).
Yours, etc.

J. Haves Luoyp.
74 Adelaide Road,
London.

We have lately received intelligence from one of our Mem-
bers, Mr. C. G. Danford, who is at present on an expedition
in the Taurus Mountains, Asia Minor. Writing from Anas-
cha, under date 8th February, he says that, after considerable
loss of time from various causes, he has at last found the
haunts of the Snow-Partridge (Tetraogallus caspius ?), and is
sending over skins to Mr. Dresser for determination, as he
thinks that it may differ from the species found in the
Caucasus. This bird, he adds, is tolerably common. They
had already been paired about three weeks, and were living
on or near the snow in rocky places at an elevation of about
6000 feet, never descending lower down the mountains. Of
other rare birds he has as yet seen but few. Sazicola ery-
threa appears to be the common Chat of the country, and
had just arrived; and the Common Chough is the most nu-
merous of the Crow tribe.

Je tia Beles:

THIRD SERIES.

No. XXIII. JULY 1876:

XX VII.—On the Psittaci of the Mascarene Islands.
By Aurrep and Epwarp Newron.

ePlacer Vale

Unvsvat interest attaches itself to the members of the Order
Psittaci indigenous to the Mascarene Islands from the fact
that, while all of them are species peculiar thereto, the great
majority have either already become extinct within the last
two hundred years or must be regarded as expirmg. A good
deal of misapprehension, too, prevails as to the proper habitat
of some of them; and this it may be desirable to correct.
The Mascarene Islands are most conveniently considered
to form three groups :—(1) the Seychelles; (2) Mauritius and
Réunion (formerly Bourbon)—which, from their proximity,
should be taken together, though there is much difference in
the ornis of each; and (8) Rodriguez. The first group con-
_ sists of an archipelago, the Land-birds of which have before
been treated in this journal (Ibis, 1867, pp. 335-860) ; the
second group, of the two islands just named—Mauritius, with
a few subsidiary islets attached, and Réunion, having no such
appendages, but rising from déep water without even the inter-
vention of a coral-reef. The third group is composed of one
SER. III.—VOL. VI. U

282 Messrs. A. Wie Te Newton on the Psittaci

main island almost surrounded by reefs and beset by several
small islets.

Of the Parrots of the Seychelles nothing new is now to be
added to what has been said of them in the paper above men-
tioned. A few more specimens of each of their peculiar
species, Coracopsis barklyt and Paleornis wardi, have come
into our hands; and we gladly avail ourselves of the Editor’s
offer here to illustrate both sexes of the latter (Plate VI.),
one of the finest members of the genus. It is certain that,
owing to the clearing-away of the natural forests and replant-
ing of the ground with cocoa-nuts—which do not contribute
to the subsistence of the Parrots—both species are decreasing
in numbers. Add to which the fact that they are everywhere
ruthlessly killed by the people as opportunity offers, on
account of the damage they do to the crops of Indian corn,
and there cannot be much doubt that they are doomed to
extinction. )

The Mauritian fauna once included two Parrots. The large
species described by Prof. Owen (Ibis, 1866, p. 168) from a
fragmentary mandible found with Dodos’ bones in the Mare
aux Songes, has had more light thrown upon it by recent in-
vestigations ; and M. Alphonse Milne-Edwards in 1866 (Ann.
Sc. Nat. ser. 5, vi. pp. 91-111) proved that it could not be
referred to any of the established genera or subgenera of
Psittact. A few other bones of it—a second mandible and
a tibia bemg the chief—have since been discovered (op. cit.
xix. art. 3, p. 25), and two very characteristic figures of it
have been recognized by Prof. Schlegel in the MS. journal of
an ancient Dutch voyager (Ibis, 1868, pp. 503, 504). Tra-
cings of these show that the bird had a frontal crest of a shape
quite unlike, so far as we are aware, that found in any other
form of Parrot, and suggest that it had wings so short as
possibly to be inadequate for flight. It has hence been pro-
posed to be regarded as forming a distinct genus (P. Z. S.
1875, p. 350), and it will probably stand as Lophopsittacus
mauritianus (Owen), under which name it has lately been
figured (Encycl. Brit. ed. 9, iii. p. 732). There is no doubt
that this bird has long been extinct.

2 tet?

J.GKeulemans lith.

PALASORNIS WARDIT.

Ibis lS 76 PL VI.

M&N,Hanhart imp.

of the Mascarene Islands. 283

A smaller species of Parrot—commonly known as Paleornis
egues—still survives in Mauritius, but its numbers are gra-
dually failing, though in the district of Grand Port, where
the monkeys have been thinned, it seems to be enjoying a
transient prosperity. It is shy, and frequents the forests
only, retiring before cultivation. It appears to feed exclu-
sively on the seeds and fruits of the indigenous trees, gene-
rally keeping to their upper branches*. When going from
one place to another it usually flies high, over the tree-tops
and out of gun-shot, uttering a short call-note, “kek,” “ kek,”
repeated quickly four or five times, and something like that
of a Water-hen (Gallinula). While feeding or sitting on the
tops of the tall trees it not unfrequently whistles melodiously.

To the excellent diagnosis and description of this species
by Dr. Finsch (Papag. i. pp. 35-40), from specimens in our
collection, little is to be added; but, in consequence of Mr.
Hume’s appeal (Stray Feathers, i. p. 15), we may state that
the example described by the former as “‘Jiingeres ¢ (oder ? )”
was one of the earliest we obtained, and was thus doubtfully
marked before it was submitted to his examination. We now
believe it to be an adult female, and may say that that sex
seems to differ from the adult male in having a black bill, a
very slight trace of the male’s black gular ring, but none of his
red or blue collar, and that in general colour she is as intensely
green as he is. We have a young male which is hardly dis-
tinguishable from the female, except that the bill is blackish-
brown, while in another the red is beginning to show itself
at the base, though there is not a trace of the black ring.
Through the kindness of Mr. Caldwell we have two eggs of
this species, which were taken with the mother from the nest
in a hole of a tree. They measure 1°26 by 1:04 and 1:24 by
1:04 respectively, and are of the lack-lustre white usual among
the eggs of this Order of birds.

* Tn only one instance did I ever see a “Catau” (as its name should
be spelt, not Carteau) in the low brushwood. Littré (Dict. de la Langue
Francaise) says of this word:— Catau. Fille de ferme ou d’auberge.
Fille malpropre et de mauvaise vie. Abréviation populaire de Catherine.”
—E.N. :

284 Messrs. A. and E. Newton on the Psittaci

- Here it is to be remarked that the specific’ term eques,
conferred by Boddaert on the subject figured in the ‘ Planches
Enluminées’ (No. 215), properly belongs to the Parrakeet of -
Réunion—the bird there represented being called “ Perruche
de Vile de Bourbon,’ whence De Buffon (Hist. Nat. Ois. vi.
p. 144) expressly says it was brought, identifying it also with
the “ Perruche & collier de V’ Isle de Bourbon” of Brisson (Orn.
iv. p. 328, pl. xxvii. fig. 1), who likewise states that it is found
there. It now no longer inhabits Réunion, and whether a
specimen from that locality anywhere exists is not known to
us. Judging from the general dissimilarity of the avifauna
of that island and of Mauritius*, we should be inclined to
‘suppose that each had its peculiar Palgornis; and, in the
event of this being found to be the case, we would venture to
suggest the term echot+ being applied to the Mauritian bird,
which, no doubt, answers in nearly all particulars to the true
eques.

It has just been stated that the Paleornis is extinct in Ré-
union. That island, indeed, is at present destitute of any
indigenous Parrot; for though M. Maillard (‘Notes sur Vile
de la Réunion,’ p. 162) includes Coracopsis vasa as being
found there, it has obviously been introduced thither from Ma-
dagascar {. But Parrots there were once, and of several species,

_ * The only indigenous species of Land-birds common to the two islands
are, we believe, Collocalia francica, Phedina borbonica and Tchitrea borbonica,
The Hypsipetes, the Oxynotus, and all the species of Zosterops are distinct.
The original Foudia of Réunion (Emberiza borbonica, Gmel. Syst. Nat. i.
p. 886, founded on the Mordoré of De Buffon, Hist. Nat. Ois. iv. p. 366,
PL. Eni. 321, fig. 2) we have never seen, the species now found in the
island being ee zensis, believed to be an importation.

+ *Hy®, nympha quedam, imitatrix equitis—sc. Narcissi. Ov. Metam.
iii. 880.

} The introduction of the other species of Coracopsis seems also to have
been once effected ; for in the ‘ Voyage dans les quatre principales iles des
mers d’Afrique’ of Bory de St. Vincent, performed in 1801 and 1802,
where the author is telling of an excursion in Réunion, we have this pas-
sage (i. pp. 350, 851):—“ Nous nous étions arrétés un instant pour tuer
des merles { Hypsipetes borbonicus, of course], dont nous trouvions une
prodigieuse quantité, lorsque j’entendis quelques sifflemens aigres, que
notre guide me dit étre ceux d’une espéce de perroquet noir; nous nous

of the Mascarene Islands. 285

in Bourbon; and the proper haditat of one of these appears
to us to have been so seriously mistaken by many recent
authors, that some little space may well be devoted to the
investigation of the matter.

Whatever may have been the Psittacus obscurus of Linneeus
(S. N. ed. 12, p. 140), founded on a “ Parrot from Africa”
which came under Hasselquist’s notice during his travels in
the East (It. Paleest. p. 236, fide Linn.), and at first. (1766)
identified by Linnzus with “Le Perroquet Mascarin” of
Brisson (Orn. iv. p. 315), there can be no question as to the
latter, on which, in 1771, was established the P. mascarin—
an abbreviation most likely for P. mascarinus—of Linnzeus
(Mantiss. p. 524), that author citing also Daubenton’s figure
(Pl. Enl. 35), and adding ‘‘ Habitat in Mascarina’”’—the last
piece of information being doubtless obtained (for Brisson
had said, ‘‘ J’ignore dans quel pays on le trouve. Je Vai vu
vivant a Paris.”’) from De Buffon, who stated (Hist. Nat. Ois.
vi. p. 121), “ M. le Vicomte de Querhoént nous assure qu’on
le trouve & Vile de Bourbon ot probablement il a été trans-
porté de Madagascar.” This probability appears very ques-
tionable, as much so as Buffon’s assertion that the bird received
its name “ parce qu’il a autour du bec une sorte de masque
noir qui engage le front, la gorge et le tour de la face.”
Du Bois, who visited Madagascar and Bourbon in 1669-72,
gives the following account of the Parrots of the latter :—

“ Perroquets gris, qui sont aussi bons que des Pigeons.

“Voila le meilleur Gibier de 1’Isle.

‘“‘T] y a de plusieurs autres sortes de Perroquets, dont on ne mange
point; s¢gavoir.

mimes a la recherche de cet oiseau, et nous en tuames deux. Le perro-
quet noir vit solitaire dans les bois les plus élevés; il mord violemment:
la tristesse de ses moeurs répond 4 celle de son plumage.” In a footnote
he refers his birds to Psittacus niger, Gmelin (S. N. i. p. 886) te. Cora-
copsis niger (Linn.). Speaking of the same island in another place (iii.
p- 64), he says:—“Quelques perroquets solitaires, dont j’entendis des
sifflemens aigus, mais dont je ne pus tuer un seul, peuplent la circonférence
du volcan.” In this last passage he does not refer the birds to any species ;
but, from the similarity of phrase, he most likely considered them the
same as those he had before seen and determined.

286 Messrs. A. and E. Newton on the Psittaci

“ Perroquets un peu plus gros que pigeons, ayant le plumage de couleur de
petit gris, un chaperon noir sur la teste, le becq fort gros, & couleur de feu.

“ Perroquets verts gros comme pigeons, ayant un collier noir.

‘‘ Perroquets verts de n esme [mesme] grosseur, ayant la teste, le dessus
des ailes, & la queué couleur de feu.

“ Perroquets tout verts de la mesme grosseur.

“Perroquets des trois fagons comme cy-dessus, qui ne sont pas plus
gros que des Merles.’’*

Now, considering that Du Bois was not a technical orni-
thologist, his indication of these different kinds of Parrots
seems to be reasonably good, and the first of those which he
says are not eaten may fairly be identified with “ Le Mas-
carin,’ though the black on the face of that bird cannot be
correctly described as forming a “chaperon.”’” But if we
reject this identification we shall find that we have to account
for two species of Parrot, both connected with the same island
and,sofar as we can judge, very similar in appearance, differing,
indeed, only in the position of a black mark on the head.

De Querhoént’s assurance was confirmed in 1784 by Mau-
duyt, who says (Encycl. Méth. 11. p. 196) :—“ On trouve le mas-
carin & Vile de Bourbon ; j’en ai vu plusieurs vivans a Paris ;
c’étoient des oiseayx assez doux; ils n’avoient en leur faveur
que leur bec rouge qui tranchoit agréablement sur le fond
sombre de leur plumage; ils n’avoient point appris 4 parler.”

It is true that for many years past Madagascar has been
given as the habitat of P. mascarinus ; it is therefore worth
while enquiring into the evidence in favour of that locality ;
and it will be found that—apart from the supposition, already

* ‘Les Voyages faite par le Sieur D. B. aux Isles Dauphine ou Madagas-
car, & Bourbon, ou Mascarenne, és années 1669. 70.71. & 72... Paris...
M.DC.LXXxIV.’ (pp. 172,173). This work, it may be remarked, attracted
no attention from naturalists till, Telfair having given the Zoological

Society a MS. copy of it, Strickland quoted therefrom the passage relating
to the Solitaire and Ovseau bleu of Bourbon (P. Z. 8. 1844, p. 78), but was

not aware, even in 1848, of the author’s name, or that the journal had.

ever been printed—a fact, indeed, generally overlooked until pointed out
in 1852 by Mr. Pinkerton (‘Notes and Queries,’ vi. p. 83), and after-
wards by Dr. Coquerel (‘ Album de I’Ile de la Réunion,’ 1863), but still
more prominently set forth by M. Milne-Edwards, who, in 1866, reprinted
the whole of the ornithological portion of the work (Ann. Sc. Nat. Zool.
ser. 5, vi. p. 42, note),

SAE OE - P —

f of the Mascarene Islands. 287

quoted, of Buffon—there was nothing to point to Madagascar
till Levaillant in 1805 declared (Hist. Nat. Perroquets, ii.
p- 112) :—* Le Mascarin se trouve 4 Madagascar, et méme,
assure-t-on, 4 |’ile de Bourbon.” Thus the locality commonly
assigned really rests with this writer, so notoriously untrust-
worthy in the matter of localities; and it may be remarked
that he does not adduce the shadow of a fact in support of his
assertion. Buffon and Brisson are the only authors he cites,
and therefore most likely the only authors whose books on this
point he had consulted. He says it is rare, and that he had
only seen three examples—one in Mauduyt’s possession,
another in that of Aubry, and the third in the Paris Museum,
which last still exists. This is, of course, totally insufficient to
contravene the direct statements of De Querhoént and Mau-
duyt, that the species was found in Bourbon, to which state-
ments the account of Du Bois lends greater strength. Yet
nearly all succeeding writers have followed the assertion of Le-

_vaillant. The derivation of the name “ Mascarin” furnished

by Buffon (which, seeing that Mascaréne or Mascarina was
the older name of the island, is quite untenable) has doubtless
been the chief cause of the error which has misled Bechstein,
Kuhl, Vieillot, Lesson, Wagler, Hahn, and finally Dr. Finsch,
or rather, perhaps, has hindered them from the right path.
It may be remarked that not one of these authors has been
able to add a single jot of information on the question of lo-
cality. Only two specimens of the species seem to have been
preserved to the present time—that in the Paris Museum,
already mentioned, and that in the Museum of Vienna,
noticed in ‘The Ibis’ (1873, p. 32). Hahn’s figure (Orn.
Atlas, Papageien, pl. 39), published in 1834, was taken, he
says, from a living bird then in the menagerie of the King
of Bavaria ; but what became of its remains at its decease (and
it seems to have died since) is not known.

We now come to Rodriguez. Here we know of two
species :—one, the Necropsittacus rodericanus of M. Alphonse
Milne-Edwards (Ann. Se. Nat. Zool. ser. 5, vill. pp. 145-156,
xix. art. 3, p. 18), a large species, not inferior in size to Lo-
phopsittacus mauritianus, whose remains were found in com-

288 On the Psittaci of the Mascarene Islands.

pany with those of Pezophaps solitaria, and of which the
latest trace is afforded by an anonymous manuscript, ‘ Rela-
tion de VIle Rodrigue, contained in the Archives of the
Ministére de la Marine at Paris (P. Z. 8. 1875, pp. 39-42) ;
and the other, Paleornis exsul (Ibis, 1872, p. 33, 1875, p. 342).
The former has doubtless been extinct for many years ; but the
latter may perhaps still survive, and since the last mention
of it in these pages a second example has come into our hands,
through the kindness of Mr. Caldwell of Mauritius+. This is
that of a male bird ; and though not possessing the red alar
patch, by which it was hoped it would be adorned, it is of
considerably-greater beauty than the previously known female.
The specimen was killed by Mr. Vandorous, 14th August,
1875; and its sex is vouched for by him. He also states
that the eyes were “black ‘with a yellow ring.” It (2)
differs from the type (¢) at first sight by its maxilla, which
is of deep crimson at the base, gradually paling to horn-
colour at the tip. The mandible, in life, seems to have been
of a dark reddish brown. The top of the head is less grey
and of a clearer glaucous than in the female. From the
nostril to the eye on each side there is a distinct narrow black
stripe, which is so faintly indicated in the female that no
notice was taken of it in the original description. The black
chin-stripe on each side is also well defined, and is prolonged
upwards so as almost to meet on the nape of the neck. Most
of the primaries are marked each by a dull black patch on
the inner web near the tip; and the middle secondaries are
also dusky black. In other respects the two specimens closely
agree; but that of the male is slightly the larger.

The following is a list of the indigenous species of Mas-
carene Psittaci known to us.

(1) SrYcHELLEs.
*Coracopsis barklyi, E. Newton.
* Paleornis wardi, E. Newton.

+ Cf. P.Z.8, 1875, p. 647, where Mr. Caldwell adds, “I have seen
several of them, though I never could get near one myself.”
* Diminishing in numbers.

bist S/S. Fi Vil

M&NHanhart hth

CJ.Fleming del.

EGGS OF TRINGA MINUTA.

On the Birds of the Lower Petchora. «289

(2) (a) Mauritius.
+Lophopsitiacus mauritianus (Owen).
*Paleornis eques (auctorum, sed qguere Bodd.?).
(0) Reuntron.
+ Coracopsis mascarinus (Linneus).
+Paleornis eques (Boddaert).

(3) RopRicuez.
+Necropsittacus rodericanus, A. Milne-Edwards.
{Paleornis exsul, A. Newton.

It will be observed that we do not regard Psittacula cana,
of which we may mention we have now seen specimens from
Rodriguez, as indigenous to the Mascarene Islands. Its
proper home is Madagascar; whence it has doubtless been
introduced, though probably very many years ago.

XXVIIT.—Notes on the Birds of the Lower Petchora. By
Henry Sreesoum, F.Z.S., and Joun A. Harvie Brown.

[Continued from page 230. |
(Plate VII.)

EvupDROMIAS MORINELLUS (L.).

The Dotterel is one of the species which we did not meet
with during its migration, but which we afterwards found
upon the tundra. We saw two pairs on the 26th June at
Stanavoialachta, frequenting the low round hills on either
side of the bay, and secured specimens. Judging from their
actions, we do not think they had, at that time, begun
to lay.

ARGIALITIS HIATICULA (L.).

The Ringed Plover was first noted by us at Ust Zylma on
the 26th May. A few were seen and shot at Habariki; and
they were found sparingly in suitable localities along the
river to Gorodok, where they became rather more abundant,
frequenting the sandy tongue of land opposite the town. At

* Diminishing in numbers. ~t Extinct. { Barely surviving.

290 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

Dvoinik they were plentiful among the sand-hills and on the
gravelly beach, and we occasionally met with them on the
: tundra some versts from the shore.

/AGIALITIS FLUVIATILIS (Bechst.).

On the 8th June we obtained a single specimen of the
Little Ringed Plover at Ust Zylma. It was identified and
shot as it rose from, and again alighted upon, a marshy,
hummocky strip of tundra-land near the town. Only one
or two other specimens were seen during our trip, one of
which was upon the tundra, at the edge of a small lake. It
is decidedly scarce, or else a late migrant not going far
to the northward in any numbers.

H#MATOPUS OSTRALEGUS (L.).

Oystercatchers were first seen by us at Ust Zylma on the
26th May, where we also obtained eggs on the 8th June; and
we found them afterwards in small numbers up to about
20 miles within the arctic circle. We did not find them
on the islands of the delta, or on the shores of the mainland
north of that point.

PHALAROPUS HYPERBOREUS (L.).

We obtained the Red-necked Phalarope at its breedine
haunts on the islands as we descended the river for the first:
time on the 17th June; and the following day we got the
eggs on an island opposite Kuya. Afterwards we found them
extremely abundant upon all the islands, and in suitable loca-
lities upon the tundra, especially at Dvoinik. During the
last week in July at Dvoinik we found the Red-necked Pha-
larope in small flocks, consisting of birds in two distinct
stages of plumage. The new dress differed from the usual
summer plumage in the following particulars :—The bill was
very soft and flexible, instead of being comparatively stiff and
hard. The back of the legs and the under surface of the feet
were pale yellow; the front of the legs and the upper sur-
face of the feet were a grey flesh-colour, whilst in the breed-
ing-plumage the legs and feet were a uniform dark lead-
colour, with a faint tinge of yellow on the margin of the
lobes. The primaries and the whole of the upper plumage

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 291

were bluish grey instead of brown. There was a distinct
white superciliary streak over each eye, extending down each
side of the neck and almost meeting on the forehead. The
feathers on the crown of the head, on the back, including
the bastard wings, and on the tail were richly edged with
rufous ochre. The red on the neck was entirely wanting ; and
the dusky band across the breast was broader and faded almost
imperceptibly into the white of the belly. The soft and flex-
ible bill certainly indicates immature birds ; but, on the other
hand, the fact that we caught three young in down, only
recently hatched, on the same day, and shot several adult
birds in the moult about the same time, and obtained most
of our fresh eggs of this species between 20th June and 4th
July, points to an early assumption of the winter plumage of
adult birds.

Toranus crortis (L.).

We first identified the Greenshank at Ust Zylma by its
well-known note, and saw it flying high overhead. This was
on the 19th May, when the snow still lay deep in the woods
but was disappearing from the higher parts of the meadows
along the course of the river Zylma. We afterwards found
it abundant at Habariki, frequenting the large marsh im the
forest behind the village, and the sides of the numerous pools
and marshy hollows which are there found through the woods.
We obtained eggs at Habariki on the 11th June. We did
not again meet with the species to the northward.

ToTANUS GLAREOLA (L.).

The first Wood-Sandpipers were shot by us at Ust Zylma
on the 26th May. They were frequenting the pools in the
middle of the town, and were exceedingly tame, allowing us
to approach within a few yards of them. They were very
common at Habariki, and we shot specimens, which had
perched on the tops of the high dead larches, quite 70 feet
from the ground. Northward they became scarcer ; and be-
tween Abramoff and Alexievka we lost sight of them altogether.
Later, however, on the tundra we found a few pairs, and
obtained the young at Vassilkova. We did not see any
further north than Stanavoialachta.

292 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on ae

Toranus Fuscus (L.).. |

The only place where we saw the Dusky Redshank was
along the sides of the great marsh at Habariki, which was
doubtless their breeding-ground. Unfortunately we did not
procure any specimens, although we fired at them several
times. When we saw them they were still going in small
flocks. This was in the beginning of June.

ActTITIs HYPOLEUCA (L.).

The Common Sandpiper was far from being an abundant
species on the Petchora, as far as we had opportunities of
judging; and it was only upon one stretch of the river that
we saw or obtained specimens, viz. between Habariki and the
Yorsa river. It is worthy of note that, though more abun-
dant in the neighbourhood of Archangel, they were also very
locally distributed in that locality (Ibis, 1873, p. 68).

TEREKIA CINEREA (Gild.).

_ We first noticed this species at Habariki on the 3rd June,
and afterwards procured it at Ust Zylma, and traced it all
the way down the river, but did not find it quite so plentiful
as Alston and Harvie Brown did on the Dvina in 1872 (Ibis,
1873, p. 68). We did not see it upon the tundra. The
Terek Sandpiper is extremely fond of running over the bits
of floating driftwood on the submerged outskirts of the forest,
uttering its musical “ tir-r-r-whui.”

Limosa #GocEPHALA (L.). :

Only one specimen of the Bar-tailed Godwit was seen,
upon the tundra, near the sea-shore, at Dvoimik. It was
extremely shy, and evaded several attempts to get within
range, always rising out of gun-shot, and settling again some
distance off upon the hummocks. When resting it drew in
the neck, the bill pointing in an almost horizontal position.

Macuetes puenax (L.).

A Ruff was brought to us for sale at Ust Zylma on the
30th May; and when we visited the marsh behind Habariki,
on the 3rd, 4th, and 5th June, Ruffs were going in small
flocks. At the latter locality we procured the first eggs, on

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. C208

the 12th June. Descending the river we saw Ruffs at their
‘hills’? on the 17th June, and procured eggs as late as the
27th on an island opposite Stanavoialachta. Flocks of Ruffs
were seen frequenting the marshy estuary of a small river, on
the tundra opposite Alexievka, on the 9th July; and the au-
tumn plumage was fully assumed by the 29th July, when we
shot a Ruff at Dvoinik out of a flock in the same plumage in
which they are shot in this country in September. Ruffs
and Reeves were abundant on the islands, but comparatively
scarce, or local, on the tundra.

TRINGA SUBARQUATA, Guild. |

During a short half-hour that we visited Dvoinik, on the
occasion of our first visit, Seebohm succeeded in securing a
single example in full breeding-plumage, which was all we
saw of the Curlew Sandpiper, unless six or seven other birds,
which were feeding along with it at the time it was shot,
were of the same species. We obtained no definite clue to its
breeding-haunts ; but from the accounts we heard, conflicting
and untrustworthy as these often were, we gathered that
marshy plains and swamps of great extent lie along the
courses of the numerous rivers and small streams which flow
from the Pytkoff Mountains to the sea, to the north-eastward of
Dvoinik. Of this fair land of promise we were only permitted
to obtain a very distant and unsatisfactory view, as, on the
only occasion when we might have seen it had the air been
clear, from a height upon the tundra to the north of the inlet,
a white mist lay along the distant hollows, completely con-
cealing the features of the landscape. The Curlew-Sandpiper,
as we learn from Mr. Bogdanoff, is seen on the Volga and
Kama rivers during both migrations.

Trinea cincLus, L.

We did not see the Dunlin at all during the time of its
migration ; nor did we meet with it until the 22nd June, when
we landed for the first time on the tundra opposite Alexievka.
There we found a few pairs scattered over the grassy swamps,
and afterwards saw them in great numbers at Dvoinik and
on the Golaieyskai islands. At the latter locality immense

Pa a

294 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

flocks were seen feeding at or flying along the edges of the
sand-banks when the tide receded. We supposed that these
large flocks came from some locality distant from their feeding-
grounds; and we noticed that the majority of them arrived
from the northward. This was on the 14th July. We are
somewhat at a loss to know whence they came, and where
their especial breeding-grounds were, unless they came along
shore from the westward from the tundras of the Timanskai
land. The Timanskai coast, as we were informed, and the
whole promontory of Russkai Zavarod are sandy; and this
information confirms the accounts of the earlier voyagers
(vide Hakluyt’s ‘ Voyages,’ ‘‘ Voyage of Steuen Burrough,”
vol. i. p. 279). Thus it is quite possible that the low-lying
Golaievkai. banks may be the nearest available and suitable
feeding-grounds for the Dunlins and other Waders which
breed on the northern parts of the Timanskai tundra. We
fired several times into these flocks, but failed to discover any
immature examples amongst those we killed, as we naturally
expected to do upon finding such large flocks at this season ;
nor was it, indeed, until some days afterwards that we pro-
cured the first young we had seen, viz. on the 20th July, at
Vassilkova.

TRINGA MINUTA, Leisl.

The short arctic summer was already far advanced; it was
the 13th July ; and we had almost despaired of reaching the
breeding-haunts of the Little Stint. During the migration
of the birds at Ust Zylma, and-on our voyage down the river,
nothing had been seen of the species, though every passing
“trip” of Temminck’s Stint had been eagerly scrutinized,
and many birds shot for identification. We made a point of
shooting every Stint about which we had the least doubt.
Clearly there were no Little Stints on any of the islands, nor
at any point visited by us between Ust Zylma and the sea;
and clearly also they had not migrated past Ust Zylma. One
of two things remained for us to do—either to induce M.
Arendt to allow us the use of the river-steamer to visit the
distant island of Varandai, near the eastern entrance to the

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 295

Petchora gulf, or lagoon of the Petchora, or to go to the far-
out islands called the Golaievskai Banks, which stretch from
Cape Kuskoi Zavarod across the north side of the same sheet
of water. ‘The former of these plans was considered im-
practicable, owing to the unsatisfactory state of the only
compass, and the danger of certain sand-banks or sunken
rocks lying near the course, upon which, on a former occasion,
Captain Engel had lost his vessel. The latter plan was more
easily accomplished, as it is part of the annual duty of the
Captain to visit these far-out islands, and to erect beacons
upon two of them, to guide vessels from the sea into the
only safe channel.

At 6 o’clock on the morning of the 13th July we were
awakened by M. Arendt; and shortly afterwards.we were on
board the steamer, which was bound for the Golaievskai Banks.
At the river-bar, about thirty-four miles from Alexievka, we
took the cutter in tow alongside, and after a tiresome navi-
gation of an intricate channel through the Shallow Sea (Soo-
khoy’e More of the Russians), we landed about midnight
upon the island upon the east side of the channel, which is
marked in the Admiralty Chart as “No. 4.” While the
men were engaged in erecting a wooden beacon, the old one
having been carried away by the ice when it broke up in
spring, we had an hour or two’s shooting upon the low sand-
bank, and, amongst other things, obtained the old and young
in down of the Glaucous Gull and our first Sanderlings.
Leaving No. 4, the steamer was obliged to lie-to in the midst
of a dense fog, after a vain search for the island known as
“No. 3,” which is upon the western side of the navigable
channel, and upon which another beacon had to be erected.
About 4 o’clock a.m. on the 14th July the fog lifted, and we’
soon after landed. Here the last year’s beacon having been
only upset, and not, as is usually the case, carried away, we
had only a short run upon the sand-bank, and were soon ob-
liged to hurry again on board. As ships from the sea might
arrive at any time-now, it was of the utmost importance that
a third beacon should be erected without loss of time upon
the mainland on the south-east shore of the lagoon of the

296 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

Petchora, near the Dvoinik (or Twin) Capes. Accordingly
the steamer moved off, and, getting into the proper channel,
steamed south for the place in question.

About 4 p.m. she came to an anchor opposite the wreck of
a sloop, which formerly belonged to the Petchora Timber
Company, and which was now lying on an even keel on the
shore, about two versts south-west of Dvoinik. We accom-
panied the men on shore. Harvie Brown went away inland,
finding nothing of interest except a wing-feather of a Snowy
Owl, and seeing only a few pairs of Grey Plover frequenting
the tundra. Seebohm had grand success during that short
hour on shore. He had walked along the shore to the north-
eastward and came upon a large shallow inlet of the sea, with
muddy edges, frequented by many flocks of wading birds ;
and he returned to the steamer, after a short half-hour’s stay
at the inlet, laden with treasures. He produced from his
fishing-basket first a Grey Plover, then a Snow-Bunting (the
first we had seen since leaving Ust Zylma, then a Curlew-
Sandpiper (the only one obtained by us), and lastly, and
most triumphant success of all, five Little Stints. It may
be imagined with what disgust he had seen the last man
descend from the beacon just as he had secured these rare
birds, and how reluctantly he had turned his steps away from
this fair land of promise. We did not then know that we
should be able to return; but from that day we strained every
nerve to secure the services of the steamer for another trip
to Dvoinik, and at last we succeeded. This was not, how-
ever, until the 23rd July, M. Arendt up to that time having
been uncertain whether the steamer might not be required
on what he considered more important business. The vessel
that was to take us home to England had arrived, and was
already engaged in lading with larch timber at Alexievka; and
we had put all our belongings on board, so that we might be
ready to leave at once on our return. It was arranged that
the steamer should land us close to the wreck, along with our
small boat, and sufficient provisions for a week, and return
for us at the end of that time. Piottuch and our four men
came also; so we went fully prepared to have a thorough

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 297

search for the nest of the Little Stint, and possibly also that
of the Curlew-Sandpiper. -We left Alexievka at 10 a.m. on
the 22nd July, and landed at the wreck about 4 p.m. After
hurriedly bearing the baggage, provisions, &c. on board the
wreck, which was in a habitable condition, and which was
to be our home for the next week, we started off along the
shore in the direction of the inland sea where Seebohm had
first discovered the flocks of Little Stints.

We will now endeavour to describe this part of the coast
and tundra, which is situated as nearly as possible on the
parallel of 684° N. lat.

Along the water’s edge at high tide the shore is gravelly
and sandy, and is about thirty yards in breadth, sloping gra-
dually up to the base of the peat cliff which forms the ter-
mination of the tundra, and which is about twenty to thirty
feet in height. Close to the base of the peat-cliff great
quantities of drift wood have been washed up and left high
and dry by the tide, and afforded us abundant fuel for our
camp. From the top of the bank, or level of the vast tundra,
a distant view of the Pytkoff Mountains (piet kova, five peaks
or caps) can be had on aclear day. ‘These hills are 583 feet
high (vide map of the Petchora published by the Petchora
Timber-Trading Company), and about twenty-five versts dis-
tant from the beacon in an easterly direction, forming the
highest land between the Petchora river and the Ural Moun-
tains. The coast-line runs in a general N.E. and S8.W. di-
rection ; but after passing the inlet it trends more to the north-
ward as far as Cape Constantinovka. On either side of the
entrance to the inland sea lie the low points of sand known
as Dvoinik or the Twin Capes. The inland sea is shut off
from the Petchora Gulf, to the north of the Boluanskai Bucht*,

* The headland between the gulf and the Petchora-mouth, north
of Stanavoialachta, is called Boluanskai Noss; but it must not, of course,
be confounded with the cape of the same name—meaning, as we are in-
formed by Mr. Lamont, Idol Cape (‘ Yachting in the -Arctic Seas,’ 1876,
p. 184)—which forms the N.E. extremity of the Waygatch Islands,
at the eastern entrance of the Kara Gates. The Boluan there men-
tioned is the place where Purchas relates (‘Pilgrimes,’ vol. iii. p. 533,

SER. 11I1.— VOL. VI. x

298 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J . A. Harvie Brown on

except at their point of junction, by a peninsula, the sea-
ward side of which consists of a range of sand-hills covered
with esparto-grass, lowering towards its extremity to a gravelly
sandy ridge, which latter, sweeping inland in a circle, comes
‘to a sharp point, and forms a promontory on the shore of the
inland sea*. Inside the sand-hills there is a level green
-ymeadow studded over with many small pools, and intersected
‘by narrow winding lanes of brackish and stagnant water.
Many of these pools are of curious shapes, having almost an
artificial appearance, their edges, about a foot in height, being
perpendicular and even, as if cut byaspade. At the bottom,
‘below a foot or two of water, is a deep, tenacious, bluish
‘black mud, which, if disturbed, gives off a powerful and offen-
sive smell. Quantities of water-plants grow on the surfaces
of some of them, sometimes almost choking them up. It is
upon the edges of the pools and on the shores of the inland
sea adjoining, that the flocks of wading birds are found at
feeding-time. Red-necked Phalaropes settle on the surface
of the pools; Ruffs and Dunlins and the little flocks of Stints
feed along the edges ; and a few Grey Plovers come down from
the tundra and run over the meadow. Buffon’s Skuas fly
overhead from time to time; and Seebohm obtained a fine
Snowy Owl, which perched on the gravel ridge. Snow-
Buntings were seen here occasionally ; but they seemed to
prefer the piles of drift wood near the sea-shore and the barer
ground, Ducks—Long-tailed and Pintail—with their young,
were also found; and Wild Swans were sometimes seen far

A.D. 1611) that “an airie of Slight- [sic] Falcons” was purchased. It
was near this also that we found two nests of the Peregrine Falcon.
The persistent return of Falcons to favourite breeding-places year after
year has been recorded before, notably in ‘Ooth. Woll.,’ part 1, p. 99;
and it is possible that in this instance also the same sites may have
been occupied continuously, or at intervals, since the date mentioned by
Purchas,

* The geographical position of the inland sea, as shown upon the Ad-
miralty Chart (Chart of Norway and White Sea—Supplementary Sheet)
is as nearly as possible 683° N. lat., and 55°55’ KE. long. In this chart
even the above-mentioned promontory is delineated with tolerable ex-
actitude. :

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 299

out on the surface of the waters of the inland sea, or their
footprints detected on the damp sand or mud. The sand-
hills and gravelly ground were frequented by Ringed Dot-
terels, and the sea-shore by a few Sanderlings, Gulls, and
Arctic Terns. |

The inland sea is a large sheet of water connected with
the Petchora Gulf by a narrow channel between the two
low sand capes of Dvoinik, and is about 2} versts across in
any direction. It is surrounded by a strip of grassy meadow-
land on a gentle slope above high-tide mark, which is from
40 to 100 yards in width, except, as already mentioned, on
the seaward side, where it is replaced by the level meadow
with a different and coarser vegetation. The whole stretch
of this sloping meadow is covered with yellow grasses and
carices; and here and there over its surface are diminutive
plants of dwarf-willow (Salix glauca), considerable quantities
of wild leeks, and isolated patches of a species of Sphagnum.
Surrounding this, again, is the tundra, which, in some places,
rises abruptly in a great wall 6 or 8 feet high, and in others
slopes gently till it meets the meadow. At the latter points
the vegetation of the tundra proper is found to blend with
that of the meadow. A ridge of bleached and weather-worn
drift wood of all sizes—branches, huge trunks, and roots—
lies piled up close to the margin of the tundra; and small
pieces are strewn over the surface of the meadow. The high-
tide mark at the lower edge of the meadow is, in most places,
sharply defined, an abrupt bank, a foot or two in height,
having been formed by the action of the water. At low tide
about forty yards of the black ooze is exposed ; and upon this,
as already noted, flocks of Dunlins, Stints, and other Waders
are usually seen at feeding-time.

The river Dvoinik runs into the inlet close to the sea,
flowing from a southerly and easterly direction. It is a
muddy still stream, with oozy bottom; and the tide ascends
its tortuous course for several versts. The tundra on either
side dips sharply down, forming steep banks on the upper
reaches ; but these give place, near its confluence with the sea,
to low perpendicular banks cut through level meadow-land

x 2

300 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

similar to what has already been described. A smaller stream
runs into the inland sea on its south-western shore, the bot-
tom of which is a quicksand, formed by a deposit of fine sand
upon the top of the ooze, which quicksand stretches out
some distance from its mouth. This little stream rises in a
low marshy meadow studded with small pools, and seems to
be connected underground with these latter, and does not, as
we at first supposed, flow from a range of lakes upon the
higher tundra, unless, indeed, there be underground com-
munication with them also.

It was upon the sloping tundra, and upon the sloping mea-
dow, that we found all our nests of eggs and young in down
of the Little Stint. Four of these sets of eggs and young—
which, for convenience, we will call Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, in
the order in which they were found—were got not far from
the neck of the peninsula, on the slope facing the N.E.
This part of the tundra bears a thick growth of arctic bram-
ble (Rubus arcticus), which, in some places, scarcely leaves a
square yard free of vegetation, The dwarf rhododendron
(Ledum palustre) is also abundant, but is small and incon-
spicuous. Large quantities of deep, soft, faded Sphagnum
cover also a considerable part of the ground; and growing
through this are Carices (Carex rariflora and another) and

grasses, and a green star-shaped moss, the latter being the.

same which is often found on the ground frequented by the
Grey Plovers. Reindeer-moss is scarce upon this Little-
Stint ground, growing only in patches here and there; but
the innumerable small round hummocks, with which parts of
it are thickly covered, bear a thin crust of minute white
lichen, which, blending with the darker colour of the peat
soil upon which it grows, gives a hoary appearance to the
higher portions of the slope. In many places this grey hum-
mocky ground is sharply defined, giving place at its edges to
tracts of slightly damper ground, which are covered with
matted white and green grass, or patches of cotton-grasses
(Eriophoron vaginatum and E. polystachyon, var. latifolium*),

* We are indebted for assistance in naming a small collection of plants
of the tundra, formed by us, principally at Dvoinik, to Professor A. Dick-

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 301

bunches or single stems of which are also found growing
through the Sphaynum-covered portions.

The grey hummocky ground is curiously intersected by nar-
row natural trenches, about a foot and a half deep, which are
probably formed by the snow-water as it trickles down towards
the pools and inland sea in spring. ‘These trenches are
mostly at right angles with one another and connected, form-
ing raised squares of tundra between. Their edges and sides
bear arctic brambles in greater profusion than the rest of the
surrounding slopes ; and the bottoms are usually covered with
grasses and Carices, though sometimes bare of vegetation, and
showing only the dark peaty soil. Looking at the thick beds
of arctic brambles and the dry, conveniently deep, comfor-
tably broad trenches, one could not help thinking of how
luxuriously one might rest in them, and—to use the happy
expression of a travelled friend, in reference to the “ multe-
bor” of Norway—“ milk the rich juices of their fruits into
his up-turned lips ;” but, alas! the mosquitoes !!

Having now endeavoured to describe the general aspect of
the inland sea and-its surroundings, and the more charac-
teristic features of the Little-Stint ground, we propose to go
even a little further into detail, and relate the discovery of
each of the sets of eggs and young which we obtained, and
which, for more convenient reference, we will number 1, 2,
3, 4, 5, 6, and 7—Nos. | and 2 being young in down, and
the others complete sets of eggs. Besides these we obtained
another single young bird somewhat older than these.

As already mentioned (p. 297), after landing and depositing
our baggage on board and in the hold of the wreck, we went
along shore towards the inlet. Here we searched the edges
of the pools in the meadow and of the ooze of the inland sea
for Stints. Dunlins were abundant; and small “trips” of
Stints were frequently detected careering overhead, or wheel-
ing over the water; but they were wild, and seldom offered a
fair shot. We went over the whole of the peninsula, and shot

son, of Glasgow University, and Mr. John Sadler, Vice-Secretary, Royal
Botanical Society, Edinburgh.

tye oe
mits
oo ie

=
SS

—=— = OS = —
= —
== = =

oe eS ee a eR SS SS a 5 == =
EE, ey = “4 a pan a ass Nw ets ==
tate

~ ———
ae a ee ere es
pie Vin ees

Sr ee ae
hae nes ge SAtS ee
=

———s
oS RP Stee’ peaks EEG ore me ae a we an =
Pg ee ee, a OE 2 — SS SS SSS SSeS aS Se : SS SES
<== —= SSS 2 —— = SSS > SSS == ==
~— zi = = : .
_ = aye bp Te eS] = es — =: ao eA eS SO eS ens © ae ee

aT eed *
Sg I rr
- re
Ne —— ee Bre
art = ee
= SS aeaee
7S Se SS
>= eo = a. eee

302 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

a few birds, but saw no place there which appeared to be likely
ground for nests of the Little Stint. It was by that time late in
the evening of the 22nd July ; but we had nothing to fear from
light failing us in these latitudes ; so we continued our search.
Meanwhile Piottuch, and our Samoyede servant Simeon,
had also come out, and having crossed over the tundra to
near the neck of the peninsula, had sat down on the edge
just where the sloping tundra joins the meadow. Seebohm
had gone on along the S.W. shore of the inland sea; and
Harvie Brown was a considerable way behind, having diverged
in order to obtain a view of the coast-line. As the latter
approached, Piottuch shouted and waved his hand. We quote
the following from Harvie Brown’s journal :—

“As I came nearer I saw a small bird flymg in circles
round him (Piottuch) and Simeon, and alighting now and
again close to them. Seeing this I ran forward, and Piottuch
held out two young Little Stints, not more than a day, or at
most two days out of the shell. I sat down; and ere many
seconds elapsed the old bird alighted within a yard or two of
our feet, uttering a very small, anxious, whistling note.
My gun lay on the ground beside me, within reach of my
hand; and I put down one of the young about six inches be-
yond it. Almost immediately the old bird advanced close up
to it, and, uttering its low notes, endeavoured to lead it away.
Piottuch then held out the the other young one in his left
hand, and it uttered a scarcely audible cheep. The old bird
advanced fearlessly to within twelve inches of his hand; and
he nearly caught it. I then shouted to Seebohm to come,
being at the same time prepared to shoot the bird if it flew
away to any distance ; but no, it only flew about ten or fif-
teen yards, and then began to sham lameness, tumbling about
amongst the little hammocks and hollows, and never going
further from us than about thirty paces. Seebohm now came
up, and took his seat beside us. The old bird became a little
shyer, but still flew round us in circles, alighting, as before,
from time to time. We watched it for some little time; and
then, at Seebohm’s suggestion, I shot the bird, and we pro-
ceeded to search for more young or a nest, offering Simeon

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 303

two rubles if he found a nest with eggs. Almost immediately
Piottuch and I ran forward, he being a little in advance, and
in a trice we had three more young, a little older than the
last. Within fifteen yards of these last young a bird rose,
and again we ran forward together. ‘Hurrah!!’ shouted
Piottuch, ‘Hurrah!! Monsieur, les ceufs!! les ceufs !!’—he
was the first to see them—and the next instant we were sitting
one on each side of the nest, the birds of both eggs and young
flying closely round us or alighting within twenty paces.
Seebohm came up; and we all sat round the nest admiring it ;
Simeon had also come up; and he caught the fourth young of
the second set. And the eggs? Miniature Dunlin’s, three
richly marked, and the fourth light and more faintly marked,
but also just like a variety of the Dunlin’s egg. And the
nest? Rather untidy, rough and uneven round its edges,
very shallow, and sparingly lined with a few small leaves,
which may have been plucked by the bird as she sat on her
nest. Round it were masses of yellow sphagnum, dark green
leaves and empty calices of the arctic bramble, and a tuft of
round-stemmed Carex (Carex rariflora). A little further off
were some, now flowerless, plants of the aromatic dwarf rho-
dodendron, bunches and patches of long white grass, and a
few single stems of the cotton-grasses. Both birds were shot
—the bird with the eggs and the parent of the four young.
The turf, a foot square, holding the nest was cut out carefully
with a knife, and the mass, including the plant of arctic
bramble, the yellow Sphagnum, and the tuft of round-stemmed
carex, placed carefully in a handkerchief, with a bit of cloth
rolled up and put into the nest to preserve its shape as much
as possible. The three old birds were ‘put in paper bags,
and the bags carefully numbered 1, 2, and 3 (two young,
four young, and four eggs). It is worthy of remark that the
old birds did not hover in the air above the eggs or young,
as Temminck’s Stint does, but only, as above described, flew
in small circles round us, alighting fearlessly close to us, and
never out of gun-shot.” |

The following day, 23rd July, was a blank as regards Little
Stint’s eggs, although we offered our men five rubles re-
ward for the nest and eggs, and all went on the search.

804 Messrs. H. Sechohu and J. A. Harvie Brown on

Late in the evening of the 24th July, however (most of
which day Seebohm and Harvie Brown had spent in explor-
ing the tundra on the north-east side of the inlet, and the
course of the Dvyoinik river, having punted our small boat
along shore amongst the sand-banks, and across the narrow
channel, and landed close to a small deserted hut made of °
logs of drift wood, Seebohm and Piottuch found another nest,
also containing four eggs, close to the place where we had got
the others. Harvie Brown had gone on along the shore to the
wreck, to prepare dinner. This nest was very neatly formed. _
Seebohm heard a bird utter a low note behind him, and, turn-
ing sharply round, said to Piottuch, “ C’est le rare Kuleek.”
They saw the bird flying up from its feeding-grounds on the
margin of the pools; and shortly afterwards it alighted on the
sloping face of the tundra. This bird had probably come |
straight away to cover its eggs; and a dense mist coming
down suddenly, over sea and land, had doubtless quickened
its movements. Seebohm and Piottuch watched it to its
nest; and after giving the bird two or three minutes’ grace,
they walked straight up to the nest. The bird was very tame,
running round them and coming close up, like the bird of
the first young (No.-1). On alighting it preened its feathers,
and then walked leisurely on to its nest. It had not appa-
rently the slightest idea of danger. Seebohm shot the bird,
cut out the turf with the nest, and brought them, along with
the eggs, to the wreck. The eggs are like the others, little
Dunlin’s all over; and we think we may conclude that the
eggs of this species run through the same varieties as those
of the Dunlin. : |
Piottuch also reported another nest containing four eggs,
which he had found during the day. He had shot the bird,
left the nest and eggs, which he wished us to see in situ.
Accordingly, about 7 p.m. on the 25th July, Piottuch took
us to this Little Stint’s nest (the fifth set), about three versts
from the wreck. The nest, which Piottuch had carefully
marked, was on the sloping edge of the tundra—the neutral
ground between tundra and meadow—on the left bank of the

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 305

small river before mentioned. The turf was rather different
from that surrounding the first nest. The yellow sphagnum
was quite absent, though the arctic bramble was still present ;
and when the turf was cut out it was found to be a dark
peaty loam only thinly covered with vegetation, whereas the
turf cut outwith the first nest consists almost entirely of
Sphagnum, to the depth of four inches. This last nest was
lined with more leaves—dried dwarf willow (Salix glauca) and
arctic bramble, either gathered by the bird herself or drifted
into it by the wind. Piottuch told us that the bird had ap-
proached to within a gun’s length of the nest, near which
he was sitting, and had preened its feathers quite uncon-
cernedly. ‘These eggs show another variety, and are inter-
mediate in colour between the other two sets.

On the 26th we searched diligently over the old ground,
carefully following the lines of the natural trenches, and miss-
ing as little ground as possible; and after some hours spent
in this way, we somewhat unwillingly came to the conclusion
that there were no more nests to be found at that place, and
that new ground must be visited.

On the 27th Harvie Brown rose at 5 a.m. with the inten-
tion of reaching the far side of the inland sea, beyond the
little river, and of finding out, if possible, the source of the
latter, and also to institute a careful search for more Little
Stint’s nests. As notes taken on the spot are usually more
exact than after-recollections, we make no apology for again
quoting from his journal :—

“T struck across the tundra, passed the lakes whence we
believed the little river flows, and descended from the higher
tundra to-a low marshy tract studded with pools, and dis-
covered the source of the river, which appears to run under-
neath the ground for some part of its course before appear-
ing on the surface. In all this stretch of tundra and bog I
only saw a solitary Willow-Grouse, a few Red-throated Pipits,
Lapland Buntings, a pair or two of Grey Plovers, and a soli-
tary Red-necked Phalarope. The banks of the river were
equally destitute of bird-life until they neared the inland
sea. There I saw a few Temminck’s Stints hovering over

i
f
if
pa at
Nat
Pay, ‘
Ws} Tag}
u
2 eal
eeditbe ey
i 2)
te | Pita
i ;
ie
Ht
Gia!
ire gy
i Ke
ae ty es ©
: a]
/ tik
unit
eA Bb
M8 as
ia J
1) PUG dae

Se ee ane

806 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

their young or eggs, a pair of Buffon’s Skuas, and a pair of
Arctic Terns.” [The Buffon’s Skuas, I may mention, each
carried off a Dunlin out of a flock, and, bearing them away
to the hummocky tundra opposite, proceeded to tear them to
pieces and devour them. This I watched them do through
my glass later.] “On arriving at a point on the river’s bank
(neutral ground between tundra and meadow) almost im-
mediately opposite the place where Piottuch found the fifth nest
the day before yesterday, I saw a Little Stint fly up from its
feeding-ground and alight by the side of a small pool of water.
Afer ten minutes spent in preening its feathers, our little
friend flew up and again settled on the slope close to an iso-
lated bunch of wild leeks. Here it again preened its fea-
thers for a few seconds, and then, running down a little slope
towards me, disappeared behind a low ridge. I watched for
its reappearance for three or four minutes, and then walked
straight up (about forty yards) to the nest, flushing the bird
off when not more then ten yards from it. The nest con-
tained four eggs. The bird settled fifteen yards further off,
and then flew straight away, being, I believe, more alarmed
at the presence of the black dog, Isaac, which had accom-
panied me, than at mine. I waited by the side of the nest
for some time, seated on the end of a trunk of drift wood, and
at last got a shot at the bird and wounded her slightly. She was
very shy and evidently alarmed. After I wounded her she
flew away and did not return, though I waited quite an hour.
This nest (No. 6) was in quite different ground from the
others, and was hollowed out amongst loose half-sandy soil,
which was sparingly covered with short green grass. Further
inland were many plants of dwarf willow. The real tundra
was 150 yards distant from the nest. I took occasion to pace
the distance as I returned from gathering sphagnum where-
with to pack the eggs. Close to the nest was a quantity of
small drift wood, and one stem of considerable size, the
former scattered over the meadow, and a few small pieces
touching the edge of the nest. The nest was lined with dried
willow-leaves and bits of carex, and contained four eggs,
handsome dwarf Dunlin’s, richly blotched at the large ends.

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 307

. .. . . About 400 yards further on along the shore, and on
the sloping dwarf-willow-covered meadow between the sharply
defined tundra proper and the equally well-defined basin of
the inland sea, and close to three stranded roots of large
trees, I found another nest with four eggs, having watched the
bird fly up, as before, from the ooze and alight, and having
flushed her from, and watched her again to the nest. This
nest was on the top of an isolated clump of sphagnum,
through which a few stems of dwarf willow were growing*.
In every respect the behaviour of the bird was the same as at
the other nests, save that the presence of the dog seemed to
cause her more alarm and make her shyer of approaching.
She once shammed broken wing, and once flew away to the
mud-flat. I lay within twenty yards of the nest, with my
back resting against one of the roots, saw her approach, preen
her feathers, advance, raise her wings and settle upon the
nest. I then put her off and shot her. I afterwards con-
tinued for a verst or two along the meadow, but saw no more
Little Stints; and I then retraced my steps to the wreck.
There I found Seebohm busy at work preparing the breast of
a Bewick’s Swant+ for dinner, baking it in clay under a
roaring fire of drift wood on the beach. It proved not un-
palatable aided by stewed prunes, especially the prunes, as
Paddy would say.”

The Samoyede, Simeon, yesterday brought in another
young bird in down, a good deal older than those procured
before ; and this was the last we saw of young or eggs of the
Little Stint, although we continued to see the old birds in
small flocks both on the shores of this inland sea and of

* Nests found upon the soft sphagnum had every appearance of having
been formed by the pressing-down of the moss by the bird’s body; but
those found upon barer ground could scarcely have been prepared in this
way, and were probably dusted out by the bird’s feet and wings; or they
may have been natural hollows chosen for the purpose. The Temminck’s
Stint, we have reason to believe, sometimes avails itself of natural hollows
in sandy localities.

+ Which Swan Feodar and Simeon had brought from the big lake at
the sources of the Eevka and Erisvanka rivers (vide article on Bewick’s

Swan, infra).

Se ee
Se ee

ES SS a TE

308 -Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

another somewhat similar locality about seven versts to the
south-west along the shore. We left Dvoinik in the steamer
on the evening of the 30th July, and, after shooting a Pere-
grine at Stanavoialachta, landed at Alexievka about mid-day.
On the Ist August we set sail for Elsinore in the ‘ Triad,’ of
Campbeltown, Captain Charles Taylor, a brigantine of 149
tons, laden with squared balks of Petchora larch, and bound
for Cronstadt. After a five-weeks’ voyage we landed at Elsi-
nore, and there, amongst the first things we did, we telegraphed
the news of our arrival to our friends at home, and of our dis-
coveries to Professor Newton and Mr. H. E. Dresser.

TRINGA TEMMINCKI, Leisl.

We got the first Temminck’s Stints at Ust,Zylma on the
26th May, and afterwards found the species extremely abun-
dant in all suitable localities, but especially so on the delta.
The first eggs were obtained on the 17th June, and the male
bird watched to and shot off the nest. Afterwards their eggs
were amongst the commonest brought to us by the Zyriani,
often more coming in than we could find time to blow.
Amongst the many eggs of this bird which we saw there were
none at all resembling those of the Little Stint. We found.
them breeding occasionally at some height above the level of
the river, as at Stanavoialachta, where we obtained a nest of
eggs on the tundra, on the summit of the steep river-bank,
which is there from 100 to 250 feet high.

CaLIDRIS ARENARIA (L.).

On the Golaievskai Islands, at the entrance of the Pet-
chora Gulf, we found Sanderlings in small parties associating
with Dunlins and feeding on the low wet sand-banks, which
are only a foot or two above the level of high tide, and pro-
cured a few specimens already beginning to undergo the
autumnal moult. Afterwards at Dvoinik a few more were

obtained, but we failed to discover their breeding-stations. |

Had our visit to the Golaievskai Islands not been so hurried,
and had we found time even to walk to the far end of one of
those we landed upon, a distance of ten versts, where, we
were told, there was higher and dryer ground covered with

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 309

grass, it 1s possible that we might have added their. eggs to
our list ; but the accounts we received, like many other items
of information, were most conflicting, one person affirming
from personal observation, that the said islands are grass-
covered, and another being equally positive that they are not.
We cannot but believe, however, that their breeding-haunts
were not far distant, whether upon the islands of the Golaiey-
skai group, unvisited by us, or upon the coast east or west of
Dvoinik, or upon the coast of the Timanskai tundra, or upon
all of these.

In regard to the migration of the Sanderling in the south
of Russia, the authors of the Russian work already referred
to tell us that it has been seen in spring on the Sarpa, and
in the autumn at Kasan.

This species must have an Saye circumpolar distri-
bution during the breeding-season, although comparatively
little as yet has been recorded of its breeding-habits. Prof.
Newton (P. Z. 8. 1871, p. 56) notices a Sanderling’s egg ob-
tained by McFarlane near the Anderson river, in N.W.
America, which was sent to him by the Smithsonian Insti-
tution, a figure of which will be found (¢om. cit. pl. iv. fig. 2).
Shortly afterwards, as we are further informed by Prof.
Newton, the eggs collected by the German North-Pole Ex-
pedition were sent to him; and among them were some which
he could hardly doubt to be those of C. arenaria. These he
exhibited to the Zoological Society (20th June, 1871), and
stated that an examination of the series showed that an egg
which Wolley and he bought in Iceland in 1858, was almost
unquestionably a Sanderling’s also* (P. Z.S. 1871, pp. 546,
547). The eggs obtained by the German Expedition were
found on Sabine’s Island, east coast of Greenland, in 1869,
and have been described by Prof. Newton (Zweite deutsche
Nordpolarfahrt, ii. pp. 240-242).

ScoLopax GALLINAGO, L.
We found the Common Snipe rather abundant at Habariki

* Canon Tristram also exhibited three eggs, supposed to be of this bird
(P. Z.S. 1864, p. 337), along with two birds.

‘ 0
i
; IF
\ 'y
“I
Hacer ee
hi y
59] }
}
1) STR
Bhi
| i
OE 3
- -
hk J
+ ier
Wall
# yah, Ls
me
| ize
iat &
j at
Vie at F
Woke !
} a
title «I
abe
| ohn
i ge aa
ye
: \
q aR a)
%
h
ie
iW
‘fe
; ?
| Fee
ey
aP
F
17 4
ru
healt
eas
af I
4)
HR }
a ty
i: ‘
:
it
ty
a
if
TBS: fF
nee
iv
} aaa
4
1a) Ses be
hi
bi
1)
ray
174) ae
%
+
ee
} th
{ots
Teka
ee
ih ,
i
i i!
add se
AL
ee
ted &
yey
aye
|
{
thal
1, he
bes ited
Mit
V ‘
a Bs
Hoe
ah ser (I
ey
nit Bi,
y L
ae
oi
Ls it
fet
"
AE
Thea tetay,
et Waa
7 5
Mh
H al
he
aad
|
1") age
ad
ip
Laat
i)
0 ae
; Nt
iit
iit
1B
iy
ene
if
He
y é
if
i} int
gy
Wt
ive
'
i!
y r
4
t

310 On the Birds of the Lower Petchora.

in the beginning of June, and afterwards traced it down the
river as far as the head of the delta, where, however, it was
scarce, and much scarcer than the next species. We did not
see it at Alexievka, nor anywhere upon the tundra. We were ©
not a little surprised when we first became acquainted with
the arboreal habits of the Snipe at Habariki, and saw one of
these birds perched, seventy feet from the ground, on the
topmost upright twig of a bare larch, where, one would have
thought, it could scarcely find sufficient foot-hold. With its
head lower than its body and tail, it sat there, uttering at in-
tervals the curious double “ clucking ”’ note, ¢jick-tjuck, tjick-
tjuck, whilst others of the same species were “ drumming ”
high in air over the marsh. To put all beyond a doubt,
Harvie Brown shot one in this peculiar position. Nor is
the Common Snipe the only bird which, not practising
the habit with us, we found perching freely in Northern
Russia: the Snow-Bunting and Pipits have already been
instanced; and. we may also mention the Common Gull, as
will be seen under the notice of that species furtheron. The
Curlew also was seen to perch on bushes and trees at Sujma,
near Archangel, by Alston and Harvie Brown in 1872 (Ibis,
1873, p. 70). There can be little doubt, we imagine, that
this habit was induced in the first instance, by the flooding
of great tracts of country by the annual overflow of the
rivers 10 spring, just at the time of the passage of the mi-
gratory flights, and, further, that what was originally forced
upon them has become, by use, a favourite habit.

ScoLopax Magor, L.

We shot a couple of Great Snipes in the forest tract behind
Habariki, which were the first examples we saw of the species.
This was on the night of the 3-4th June. Afterwards we
found it not uncommonly on the river and abundantly on the
delta, especially between Viski and Gorodok, where we fell
in with a large migratory flight on the 17th June. The spe-
cimens of the latter which we shot proved to be all male birds.
The following day we found a nest containing three eggs on
an island opposite Kuya. We did not find it anywhere on
the tundra.

Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Trochilide. 311

NumeEntivus pu@orvs (L.).

Three Whimbrels passing over Ust Zylma on the 18th May,
were whistled round and induced to alight within fifty yards,
when all three were secured. These were the only ones we
saw during our trip, though one other was heard calling on
the following day.

Grus CINEREA, L.

Only three Cranes were seen passing to the northward,
over Ust Zylma, at a great height—one on the 21st May, and
two others on the 25th May.

[To be continued. |

XXIX.—Notes on the Trochilide. The Genera Cyanomyia
and Heliotrypha. By D. G. Exxiot, F.R.S.E. &c.

CYANOMYIA.

The genus Cyanomyia, although not remarkable for pos-
sessing species resplendent in brilliant metallic colours of
many hues, nevertheless contains some sufficiently adorned
to excite admiration, while the pure white and glittering blue
and green which compose the dress of the various species
cannot but afford pleasure to all whosee them. Itisagenus
whose members are restricted to the western portion of South
America and Central America, Mexico being its northern
limit, and Peru the most southern country from which any
specimens have yet been received. The genus contains seven
species, some of which, however, cannot be said as yet to be
firmly established, or entitled to specific rank, but more as
occupying a probationary state, waiting for passports bearing
more satisfactory visés than they can at present bear.

The various species seem naturally to form two groups,
viz. those having the underparts of the body pure white,
without any metallic colouring, and those having the sides
of the neck and flanks covered with metallic feathers of dif-
ferent hues. The first of these groups contains three species,
two of which, however, may be but local races of the same
form; and the four remaining species comprise the second

312 Mr. D. G. Elhot on the Trochilide.
section. The following table will show the characters of the
species :—

A. Entire underparts pure white.
a. Tail olive-green ; top of head metallic blue, some-

times With purple reflections .............. C. quadricolor,
b. Tail bronzy red; top of head metallic purple,

sometimes with blue reflections ............ C. violiceps.
ce. Tail metallic golden, tip bronzy red; top of head

dull metallic darks green, ~.a.4+ pada. « ac stent C. viridifrons.

B. Breast and abdomen white; flanks metallic green
or bronze.

d. Under tail-coverts greenish grey.............. C. eyanocephala.
e. Under tail-coverts bronzy red ..........-00065 C. microrhyncha.
fF. Under tail-coverts white; top of head blue .... C. francia.
g. Under tail-coverts white; top of head and nape

DG isy. age ie ees ue pata see eee pee C. cyaneicollis.

On looking at the geographical distribution of the members
of this genys, we find that Mexico contains four species, viz. C.
quadricolor, inhabiting the northern part, C. violicep ansd C.
viridifrons, the western, and C. cyanocephala, the southern, this
last species extending its range into Guatemala and Honduras.
The last-named country is also stated to be the habitat
of the bird I describe in this paper as C. microrhyncha,
though I am not certain that this is the correct locality from |
which the unique example in my collection’came. As we
proceed. southwards along the western side of South America,
we find C. francie to be a native of Columbia, while Peru is
given as the habitat of the form described by Mr. Gould as C.
cyaneicollis. Nomember of this genus has yet been met with
in Ecuador, so far as I am aware, though it cannot be supposed,
if it is represented in both Columbia and Peru, that there is no
species of Cyanomyia dwelling in the country that lies be-
tween these two. In no locality east of the Andean range
has any species of this group been found; and Lesson was in
error when he gave Brazil as the habitat of C. cyanocephala.

CYANOMYIA QUADRICOLOR.
Trochilus quadricolor, Vieill. Enc. Méth. p. 182, pl. 17.
Cyanomyia quadricolor, Bp. Rev. et Mag. Zool. 1854, p.

Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Trochilide. Silo

254; Gould, Mon. Troch. vol. v. p. 284; et Intr. Mon. Troch.
p. 147, sp. 3138.

Hab. Mexico (northern districts) .

‘This species, a native of Mexico, was first described by
Vieillot (/.c.). It bears a close resemblance to C. violiceps,
but may be distinguished from that species by the colouring
of the tail, which is a pale olive-green, without any of the
bronze-red hue observable on the rectrices of its relative.
The top of the head is a blue green, sometimes with purple
reflection. In all other respects the two species are very
similar. The present bird is rather rare in collections, al-
though it is reasonable to suppose it is common in the dis-
tricts it inhabits, as are the other species of the genus in the
localities they frequent. I have remarked that sometimes
the top of the head has purple reflections like that of C. vio-
liceps. My knowledge of this fact is obtained from a spe-
cimen in my collection which has the colouring of the head
like that of typical C. violiceps, and, were it deprived of the
tail, would undoubtedly be ranked with that species; but the
rectrices unmistakably belong to C. guadricolor. The colour-
ing of these last, then, appear to be the only character by
which the two forms may be distinguished.

CYANOMYIA VIOLICEPS.

Cyanomyia violiceps, Gould, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. 3rd
ser. vol. iv. p. 97; Id. Mon. Troch. vol. v. pl. 285; et Intr.
Troch. p. 147, sp. 314.

Hab. Mexico, vicinity of Oaxaca (Sallé).

This bird, described by Gould (/. c), was procured by M.
Sallé near Oaxaca, in Western Mexico, where it appears to
be very abundant. Mr. Gould regarded it as distinct from C.
quadricolor in its “larger and somewhat forked tail, in the violet
colouring of the crown, and in having a longer and darker
bill, which, moreover, is not so broad at the base.” With a
tolerably large series of specimens before me, I find that none
of these characters are trustworthy, or sufficient to establish
the species. The colouring of the head, as I have already
stated, when speaking of C. quadricolor, varies greatly ; the

SER. I11.—VOL. Vi. Y

314 Mr. D. G. Elhot on the Trochilide.

bill in the adult in both shape and colour cannot be distin-
guished from that of the previous species; while I am not able
to perceive any material difference in the shape of the tail.
The only appreciable distinction between the two forms is, that
the tail of the present bird possesses a bronzy red hue, which
I have not yet met with in any example of C. quadricolor.
Should such be found, however, it would seem impossible to
continue the two forms as distinct species. I have one spe-
cimen from Oaxaca (Boucard) which has a deep bluish-green
head, exactly similar to that of C. quadricolor, but with a
bronze-red tail. It will thus be seen how close the two forms
are; and if they are not the same, they are probably but local
races of one species.

CYANOMYIA VIRIDIFRONS.
Cyanomyia viridifrons, Elliot, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist.
1871, vol. vii. p. 267. |

Hab. Putla, Mexico (Rebouch).

Three specimens of this species were procured by M.Rebouch
at Putla, and described by myself as above. It is between
C. quadricolor and C. cyanocephala, having the flanks a
metallic green, like the latter species. It differs from all the
known forms of this genus in its dark green head, but slightly
metallic, and in its brilliant tail, metallic golden, with a pur-
plish red tip. I have never seen but the three examples
mentioned.

CYANOMYIA CYANOCEPHALA.

Ornismya cyanocephala, Lesson, Suppl. Oiseaux-Mouches,
p. 134, pl. 18.

Cyanomyia cyanocephala, Gould, Mon. Troch. vol. v. 286 ;
et Intr. Troch. p. 147, sp. 315. .

Cyanomyia guatemalensis, Gould, Intr. Troch.p. 148, sp. 316.

Hab. Mexico (Sallé); Guatemala (Salvin) ; Honduras
(Taylor).

Lesson described the present species as the young of C. qua-
dricolor, called by him cyanocephala ; but both his description
and plate are sufficiently accurate to show that it was the pre-
sent bird he had before him. It hasa rather extensive range,

Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Trochilide. 315

more so than any other member of the genus, reaching from
Mexico, in the vicinity of Cordova (where it was procured. by
M. Sallé), through Guatemala, into Honduras. Mr. Gould,
in his Introduction to the monograph of the Humming-birds,
separates the bird from Dueiias, in Guatemala, as distinct under
the name of guatemalensis, although in his monograph he stated
that there was not the slightest difference between specimens ~
from Guatemala and Mexico. In the Introduction he charac-
terizes them as follows: ‘ Guatemalan specimens have the tail
bronzy green, while the Mexican are olive-green.” It is true
that in a series of specimens these differences are observable,
in a greater or less degree; but it does not seem to me suffi-
cient to entitle the birds from the different localities to a
separate specific rank. The difference in the majority of
cases 1s so slight that it would be well nigh impossible to
decide to which species the specimens belonged. I have
therefore placed the name C. guatemalensis as a synonym of
C. cyanocephala*.

I have had for some years in my collection a specimen of
Cyanomyia which differs from all other described species,
It was said to have come from Honduras; but for the accu-
racy of this habitat I cannot vouch. It is nearest to C.
cyanocephala, but differs in several remarkable and important
characters. Although possessing every indication of being an
adult individual, it is much smaller than its ally, and has an
extraordinarily small bill. Im some groups of the Trochilidz
I am well aware that the length of the bill 1s of no specific
value; but I have never seen any material difference in this
organ among the adult specimens of the different species
of this genus until I obtained the present specimen. Besides
its general small size and remarkable bill, the tail and under
tail-coverts are very differently coloured, the former being
more like that of C. viridifrons, though the bird resembles that
species in no other manner. Not having been successful in
obtaining another specimen, I have decided to deseribe it,
and thus call the attention of ornithologists to the bird :—

* [What is C. faustina (Boure.), Muls. H. N. Ois.M. i. p. 223?—EKp.] -
YX

316 Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Trochilide.

CYANOMYIA MICRORHYNCHA.

Top of head and occiput dark metallic ines Hind neck
and mantle shining metallic green ; rest of upper parts bronzy
red. Throat, upper part of breast, and centre of abdomen
white, with a few metallic-green feathers scattered among
the white ones. Flanks and under tail-coverts bronzy red,
metallic. Wings dark brown, slightly shaded with purple.
Tail brilliant metallic bronze. Total length 34 inches,
wing 24, tail 14, bill along culmen }.

CYANOMYIA FRANCIA.

Trochilus francie, Boure. Ann. Soc. d’Agricul. et Hist.
Nat. Lyon (1846) p. 324; et Rev. Zool. 1846, p. 316.

Cyanomyia francie, Gould, Mon. Troch. vol. v. pl. 287;
et Intr. Mon. Troch. p. 149, sp. 317.

Hab. Columbia.

A native of Columbia, this species appears to be quite
common in the vicinity of Bogota, whence numerous ex-
amples come to Europe. It is the most brilliant species of

the genus, and is closely allied to C. cyanocephala, from —

which it differs chiefly in the white under tail-coverts, and
in the greater brilliancy of the sides of the neck and flanks.

CYANOMYIA CYANEICOLLIS.

Cyanomyia cyaneicollis, Gould, P. Z. S. 18538, p. 61; Id.
Mon, Troch. vol. v. pl. 288; et Intr. Troch. p. 149, sp. 318.

Hab. Peru, eastern slope of the Andes (Warszewiez) .

I only know this form by the two specimens in Mr. Gould’s
collection. It is certainly ‘very closely allied to C. francie,
with the blue of the crown extending further down on the
nape than in specimens of that species ; but before being able
to come to a satisfactory decision as to its specific value tt
is desirable to see more specimens.

Peru is further south than any of the other members of
this genus are known to pass; and it is not improbable that
a different species exists in that country. The type spe-
cimens were brought by M. Warszewiez; and although Peru
has been fairly explored by several good collectors since his
time, the bird has not again been met with,

Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Trochilidee. 317

HELIOTRYPHA.

Having lately obtained for my collection the type of Helio-
trypha barrali, Mulsant & Verreaux, a species unknown save
by the description published in 1868 by those gentlemen, I
was led to examine its relations to the other known species
of the genus, with the results now given.

The geuus Heliotrypha is closely allied to Henman
indeed at one time the species of both were placed under
the latter term, until Mr. Gould, in his monograph of the
family, very properly separated the two species H. viola and
H. parzudakii (as given by him, exortis, as it should be called)
under the generic name by which they are now known. They
differ from the species of Heliangelus conspicuously in not
possessing any trace of the white or buff band beneath the ©
metallic feathers of the throat.

The species have but a limited geographical distribution,
being confined to districts of Columbia and Ecuador lying
on the west of the Andes. The first of these contains H. bar-
rali, from the river Saldana, the only locality in which it has
been found, so far as known at present, and H. exortis, which
is plentiful in the vicinity of Bogota, and also extends its
range into Ecuador, where it has been obtained near Popayan
and near Quito. #H. viola has, as yet, only been obtained in
Ecuador. The following table will serve to distinguish the
species, which compose but one group, easily recognizable
by their differently coloured throats :—

a, Throat metallic purple; chin with light-blue reflections... wola.
b. Throat metallic red; chin deep blue, almost black in some
lights ag cag s is. Wise one irk oe Sy ae et a Re Bae H, exortis.

c. Throat pale olive-green ........ adn Lehre Sa! Bene me H, barrali,

HELIOTRYPHA VIOLA.

Heliangelus viola, Gould, P. Z. 8. 1858, p. 61.

Heliotrypha viola, Gould, Mon. Troch. vol. iv. pl. 241; et
Intr. Troch. p. 131, sp. 266.

Hab. Ecuador.

M. Warszewicz was the discoverer of this beautiful species.
The specimens he brought came into the possession of Mr.

318 Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Trochilidee.

Gould, by whom they were described as above. It is a very
distinct species, and very rare in collections. Although allied
to H. exortis, it has too many and too striking differences to
be confounded with that species.

HELIOTRYPHA EXORTIS.

Trochilus exortis, Fraser, P. Z.S. 1840, p. 14.

Ornismya parzudakii, De Long. & Parz. (nec Less.), Rev.
Zool. 1840, March, p. 72.

Heliotrypha parzudakii, Bp. Rev. et Mag. Zool. 1854, p.
254; Gould, Mon. Troch. vol. iv. p. 240; Id. Intr. Troch.
p. 181, sp. 265.

Hab. Columbia, Ecuador, Quito (Jameson). -

This well-known species (familiar to ornithologists as H.
parzudakii) was described by Fraser in February 1840, in
the ‘ Proceedings’ of the Zoological Society, as Trochilus
exortis, and by De Longuemare and Parzudaki in the ‘ Revue
Zoologique, in March of the same year, as Ornismya par-
zudakii. The name given by Fraser will therefore stand by
right of priority ; and although one may regret thus to be
obliged to overturn an old established name, yet in the
present case the facts are too clear and unanswerable to ad-
mit the adoption of any other course, and the species must
hereafter be known as Heliotrypha exortis*.

It is a beautiful species, very common in the vicinity of
Bogota, and in collections is generally the sole represen-
tative of the genus now under consideration.

I notice that specimens from Hcuador are somewhat larger,
with longer bill and wings, while the throat-mark is more
restricted to the centre of the throat than in Columbian birds.
I do not consider these to be in any way of specific value,
or even as elevating the specimens to the dubious rank of a
variety.

_ HELIOTRYPHA BARRALI.

Heliotrypha barrali, Muls. et Verr. Ann. Soc. Linnéenne
de Lyon, xviii. p. 106 (1868).

Heliangelus squamigularis, Gould, P. Z.S. 1871, p. 508.

* [Quite clear, certainly, if reading a paper before a scientific meeting
is equivalent to publication. But are we all agreed on this point >—Ep. |

Notes on Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan,’ 319

Hab. Columbia, river Saldana, a branch of the Magdalena,
province of Antioquia (Muls. & Verr.).

This curious species was described in 1868 by MM. Mul-
sant and Verreaux from a specimen formerly in the possession
of Count Barral. The unique type was unknown to ornitholo-
gists generally, save from the description, as no opportunity has
been given to examine the bird after it passed from the hands of
its describers into its owner’s possession. In 1871 Mr. Gould
published the description of a supposed new species as Helian-
gelus squamigularis in the ‘ Proceedings’ of the Zoological
Society of London; and it was only after I had been so fortu-
nate as to obtain the type of H. barrali for my own collection
that it was ascertained to be the same as Mr. Gould’s bird.
His name will therefore become.a synonym of Heliotrypha
barrah, Muls. & Verr. Itis aspecies remarkable for the pe-
culiar coloration of the throat, which is a brilliant metallic
pale olive-green, appearing in some lights not unlike silver,
though lacking the pure whiteness of that metal*.

XX X.—WNotes on Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan’ (Turkes-
tanskie Jevotnie). By H. EK. Drussmr.

[Continued from p. 191.]

241. Upura epors, L.; Severtzoff, p. 68.

Horizontal range. Breeds in all four districts, commonly in
I. Pyvand ils

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1, 2, and 3.

242. Coracias GaARRULA, L.; Severtzoff, p. 68.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I., II., III., and IV.,
at times commonly.

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1, 2, and 3.

243, Merops apiaster, L.; Severtzoff, p. 68.

Range. Similar to that of Coracias garrula.

244. Merors persicvs, Pall. ; Severtzoff, p. 68.
Horizontal range. Breeds in districts Lil. and IV.

[* M. Mulsant has recently placed this species in a separate genus, which
he calls Nodulia (Cat. des Oiseaux-Mouches, p. 28).—Ep. | .

320 Mr. H. E. Dresser’s Notes on

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1 and 2, commonly in
the former, and occurs also on passage in district 2.

245. AxcEDo 1spipA, L.; Severtzoff, p. 68.
Horizontal range. Resident, but rare, in district III.
Vertical range. Resident, but rare, in district 2.

245 a. ALCEDO BENGALENSIS, Gm.

Alcedo ispida B. bengalensis, Severtzoff, p. 68.

Horizontal range. Breeds commonly in districts I., II.,
and III., and is resident in district IV.

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 2 and 3, commonly in
the former; occurs on passage, and possibly breeds, in dis-
trict 4.

246. Picus LEPTORHYNCHUS, Severtzoff (Ibis, 1875, p. 487).

Picus cabanisit, Severtzoff, p. 68.

Horizontal range. Resident in all four districts.

Vertical range. Resident in districts 1 and 2; breeds in
district 3.

247. PicompEs tRIpactyLus (L.).

Picus tridactylus, Severtzoff, p. 68.

Horizontal range. Resident in district I.

Vertical range. Possibly occurs in winter in district 3, and
is resident in district 4.

Obs. In a MS. note, Dr. Severtzoff adds that typical Picus
major occurs in district I., north of the Kuldja, where it is
sedentary, but rare.

248. Jynx TorquiLua (L.); Severtzoff, p. 68.

Horizontal range. Breeds and occurs on passage in all four
districts.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in districts 1 and 2, and
breeds in district 3.

249. Cucutus canorus (L.); Severtzoff, p. 68.
Horizontal range. Breeds in all four districts.
Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1, 2, and 3.

250. ? PatumBus casioris, Bp.
Columba pulchricollis, Gould ; Severtzoff, p. 68:.

Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan, 321

Horizontal range. Breeds and occurs on passage in all four
districts.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in district 2, and breeds
in districts 3 and 4.

251. CoLuMBA @NAs, Severtzoff, p. 68.

Horizontal range. Breeds and occurs on passage in districts
III. and IV.

Vertical range. Occurs rarely on passage in district:1, and
breeds in district 2, possibly also in district 3.

252. CoLUMBA LiviA, Gm.; Severtzoff, p. 68.

Horizontal range. Resident in all four districts.

Vertical range. Resident in districts 2 and 8, breeding in
the latter.

253. CoLUMBA RUPESTRIS, Pall.; Severtzoff, p. 68.

Horizontal range. Resident in all four districts.

Vertical range. Rare in winter in district 2, resident in
district 3, breeds in district 4, and occurs in summer in dis-
Trice.

254. ? CoLuMBA INTERMEDIA, Strickl.
Columba fusca, Pall.; Severtzoff, p. 68.
Horizontal range. Breeds in all four districts.
Vertical range. Breeds in district 2.

255. Turtur vuLearis, Eyton.

Columba turtur, L.; Severtzoff, p. 68.
Horizontal range. Breeds in all four districts.
Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1 and 2.

256. TurtuR RuPICcOLUS, Pall.
Columba gelastes, Temm.; Severtzoff, p. 68.
Horizontal range. Breeds and occurs on passage in all four
districts. |
Vertical range. Occurs on passage in district.2, and breeds
, in district 3.

257. TURTUR INTERCEDENS, Brehm.
Columba chinensis (Columba risoria, Schrenck, nec Hartl.),
Severtzoff, p. 68.

Ce ee tee ai

. awe
sh eter 95:

F
i ;

322 Mr. H. E. Dresser’s Notes on

This species is entered with a query. In a MS. note Dr.
Severtzoff informs me that he has since identified it with
Turtur intercedens, and that it is identical with Turtur sto-
liczke, Hume (Stray Feathers, i. p. 519).

258. TuRTUR SENEGALENSIS, L.

Columba egyptiaca, Severtzoff, p. 68.

Horizontal range. Resident in districts II., III., and IV. ;
occurs in the towns.

Vertical range. Rare in summer in district 1, resident and
common in district 2, possibly breeds in district 4.

259. PreROcLES ARENARIUS (Pall.); Severtzoff, p. 68.
Horizontal range. Breeds in all four districts.
Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1 and 2.

260. Prrrocies aLcHata (Linn.); Severtzoff, p. 68.
Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I1., III., and IV.,
and occurs on passage in district IV.; occasionally it is

common. |
Vertical range. Breeds in district 2.

261. SyRRHAPTES PARADOXUS (Pall.); Severtzoff, p. 68.

Horizontal range. Is sedentary and breeds in district I., and
occurs in winter in district ITI.

Vertical range. Resident in winter in district 1, and breeds
in district 3, where it is probably resident.

262. Trerrao Tetrix, L.; Severtzoff, p. 68.
Horizontal range. Resident in district I.
Vertical range. Resident in districts 3 and 4.

263. Trrrao vrocaLuvs, Linn. ; Severtzoff, p. 68.
Horizontal range. Rare and probably resident in district I.
Vertical range. Rare in district 4. ;

264. ? TETRAOGALLUS CASPius, Gm.

Megoloperdix nigellii, Severtzoff, p. 68.

Horizontal range. Breeds and occurs in winter in all four
districts.

Vertical range. Occurs in winter in district 3, breeds and
is resident in district 4, and occurs in summer in district 5.

Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan,’ 323

264a. MxrcoLoPerDIx NIGELLII £. minor, Severtzoff, p. 68.

Horizontal range. Resident in district IT.

Vertical range. Occurs in winter in district 3, and breeds
in districts 4 and 5.

265. CACCABIS CHUKAR, Gray.

Perdix saxatilis, var. chukar, Severtzoff, p. 68.

Horizontal range. Resident in all four districts.

Vertical range. Occurs in winter in district 2, is resident
in district 3, and is found in district 4 in summer.

266. Prerpix cinerzA, Lath. ; Severtzoff, p. 68.
Horizontal range. Rare in winter in districts I. and IIT.
Vertical range. Rare in winter in districts 2 and 3.

267. Purprx BARBATA, Verr.

Perdix daurica, Severtzoff, p. 68.

Horizontal range. Resident in districts I. and II.

Vertical range. Occurs in winter in district 2, is resident
in district 8, and is found in summer in districts 4 and 5.

268. AMMOPERDIX BONHAMI (Gray).

Perdix griseogularis, Brandt (?) (P. donhami, Fras.) , Severt-
zoft, p. 68. :

Dr. Severtzoff informs me that he included this species
only on the strength of a statement made to him, and thinks
it probable that some mistake was made.

269. CotuRNIxX comMUNIS, Bonn.

Coturnix vulgaris, Severtzoff, p. 68.

Horizontal range. Breeds in all four districts, and occurs
in winter in districts III. and IV.

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1, 2, and 3, and occurs
in winter in district 1.

As a subspecies of the common Quail, Dr. Severtzoff gives

Coturnix vulgaris B. baldami, Br. ; Severtzoff, p. 68.

Horizontal range. Breeds in district IV.

Vertical range. Breeds in district 2.

270. Puasianus moneouicus, Brandt; Severtzoff, p. 68.
Horizontal range. Resident in all four districts.
Vertical range. Resident in districts 1, 2, and 3.

324 — Mr. H. E. Dresser’s Notes on

271. GALLUS FERRUGINEUS, Gm.

Gallus bankiva domesticus, Severtzoff, p. 68.

Horizontal range. Resident in all four districts.
_ Vertical range. Resident in districts | and 2.

272. Pavo cristatus, L.

Pavo cristatus domesticus, Severtzoff, p. 68.
Horizontal range. Resident in districts III. and IV.
Vertical range. Resident in district 2.

273. Grus communis, Bechst.

Grus cinerea, Severtzoff, p. 68.

Horizontal range. Is found on passage in all four districts,
and breeds in I., II., and ITI.

Vertical range. Is found on passage in districts 1, 3, and 4,
and breeds in districts 2, 8, and 4.

274. Grus LEUCOGERANUS, Pall. ; Severtzoff, p. 68.

Horizontal range. Occurs on passage, and perhaps breeds
rarely, in district ITI. |

Vertical range. Occurs on passage, and perhaps breeds, in
district 1.

275. Grus virco (L.); Severtzoff, p. 68.

Horizontal range. Breeds in all four districts.

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1, 2, 3, and 4, and occurs
on passage in the last two.

276. Ciconia nicRA (L.); Severtzoff, p. 68.

Horizontal range. Breeds in all four districts.

Vertical range. Occurs in summer in district 2, and breeds
in district 3. |

277. CICONIA MYCTERIIARHYNCHA, Severtzoft.

Ciconia alba, var. major (C. azretti, n. sp.?), Severtzoff,
p. 68. .

Ciconia alba asiatica, id. p. 145.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts II., III., and IV.

Vertical range. Breeds in district 2.

At p. 145 he describes this bird as differing from Ciconia
alba in having a shorter and stouter bill, and gives the mea-

surements as follows :—Males, total length 46-481", extent

Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan,’ 325

873-884", wing 25-254", tail 10" 7""-10" 11", culmen 8!—8" 4",
thickness of bill 1” 6-1" 7'"" tarsus 9"-9" 2!"; females, total
length 424-444", extent 83-87"; wing 234-244", tail 94-10",
culmen 7" 5!'_8! tarsus 8! 3/8!" 6!",

In a MS. note Dr. Severtzoff writes as follows :—“ This
bird is Ciconia myctertiarhyncha, mihi, and is more closely
allied to C. boyciana than to C. alba; but it differs from that
species in having the bill entirely red: the bill; however, is
shaped as in that species, and not as in C. alba.’

278. ARDEA CINEREA, L.

Ardea cinerea, var. brag, Isid. Geoff. ; Severtzoff, p. 68.

Horizontal range. Breeds in all four districts.

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1 and 2, and occurs in
the latter on passage.

279. ARDEA PURPUREA, L.; Severtzoff, p. 68. .
Horizontal range. Breeds in district ITT.
Vertical range. Breeds in district 1.

280. ArpEA ALBA, L.; Severtzoff, p. 68.

Horizontal range. Breeds in all four districts, occasionally
commonly, and occurs, though rarely, in winter, in districts
ITI. and IV.

Vertical range. Breeds, and occurs in winter, in districts
1 and 2. |

Dr. Severtzoff also includes a subspecies under the name of
Ardea alba 8. melanorhyncha.

Horizontal range. Breeds in district IIT.

Vertical range. Breeds in district 1.

281. NycrrarpEa nycticorax, L.

Scoteus nycticorax, Severtzoff, p. 68.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts III. and IV.
Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1 and 2.

282. Boraurus steLiaris (L.); Severtzoff, p. 68.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I., I., and III., and
occurs rarely in the winter in the last of these. oR

Vertical range. Breeds in district 1, and occurs rarely in
winter and on passage in district 2.

u!
|

Hil
ie
ie

Mae }
tite ty
iy
i}
i} i
wat
|

er a a an Tce

326 Mr. H. E. Dresser’s Notes on

283. Arperra minvuta (L.).
Ardetta minuta, Severtzoff, p. 68.

Horizontal range. Breeds in district III., and is occasionaly
common.

Vertical range. Breeds in district 2.

284. Puatanea LeEucoroptia (L.) ; Severtzoff, p. 68.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts II. and IJI.

Vertical range. Breeds commonly in district 1, and occurs
rarely on passage in district 2.

285. Isis FALCINELLUS (L.); Severtzoff, p. 68.

Horizontal range. Breeds and occurs on passage in all four
districts.

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1, 2, and 3, commonly
in the first, and occurs on passage in district 2.

286. Oris rerrax, L.; Severtzoff, p. 68.
Horizontal range. Breeds and occurs on passage in-districts

I., II., and ITI.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in district 1, and breeds
in districts 2 and 3.

287. OTIs MACQUEENI, Gray; Severtzoff, p. 68.
Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I., I]., III., and IV.,
and occurs on passage in all but the last.

Vertical range. Breeds in district 1, and occurs on passage,
though rarely, in district 2.

288. Oris TarpA, L.; Severtzoff, p. 69.

Horizontal range. Breeds and occurs in winter in districts
I., I1., and ITI., and is resident in district IV.

Vertical range. Breeds and occurs in winter, being possibly
resident, in district 2, and breeds in districts and 4.

289. CipICNEMUS cREPITANS, Temm.; Severtzoff, p. 69.
Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I., II., and IIT.
Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1 and 2, rarely in the
latter.

Dr. Severtzoff further includes, without any description,
the following subspecies :—

Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan’ 327

Cidicnemus crepitans B. senegalensis.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts II., III., and IV.

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1 and 2, rarely in the
latter.

290. CHaRapRivs PLuviaLis, L.; Severtzoff, p. 69.

Horizontal range. Occurs rarely on passage in districts I.,
II., and III.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in districts 1 and 38.

291. SQUATAROLA HELVETICA, L.

Charadrius squatarola, Severtzoff, p. 69.

Horizontal range. Occurs rarely on passage in district III.
Vertical range. Occurs rarely on passage in district 1.

292. KupDROMIAS MORINELLUS, L.; Severtzoff, p. 69.
Horizontal range. Occurs on passage in districts I. and IIT.
Vertical range. Occurs on passage in district I.

293. Evupromtas caspius (Pall.); Severtzoff, p. 69.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I., I., I1I., and IV.

Vertical range. Breeds in district 1, and occurs rarely on
passage in district 2.

At page 146 Dr. Severtzoff gives a careful description of
what he considers: to be a new species, and which he calls
Eudromias crassirostris; but I need not reproduce this, as
he now informs me that it is identical with Hudromias
geoffroyi. He says that he has only seen three specimens cf
this bird, the first of which was obtained near Fort Peroffsky
on the 30th June 1858, the second near Lake Chatir-kul,
at an altitude of 11,000 feet, on the 26th July 1867, and the
third on the east coast of the Caspian, near the Krasnovodsk
Bay, on the 8rd August 1867.

294. Eupromias mMoncoticus (Pall.) ; Severtzoff, p. 69.

Horizontal range. Breeds rarely in district II., and occurs
rarely on passage in district III.

Vertical range. Occurs in summer and on passage in dis-
trict 1.

295. AMetaritis HraticuLA, L.; Severtzoff, p. 69.
Horizontal range. Breeds rarely in district HI.

328 ‘Mr. H. E. Dresser’s Notes on

Vertical range. Breeds rarely and occurs ‘on passage in dis-

trict 1, and breeds in district 2.

296. AeraLitis curontca (Gm.).

Agialites minor, Severtzoff, p. 69.
Horizontal range. Breeds in all four districts.
Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1 and 2

297. ANGIALITIS CANTIANA (Lath.).

Aigialites cantianus, Severtzoff, p. 69.
Horizontal range. Breeds rarely in district II.
Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1 and 2.

298. VANELLUS VULGARIS, Bechst.
Vanellus cristatus, Severtzoff, p. 69.
Horizontal range. Breeds in all four districts, and occurs

in winter in districts III. and IV.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in district 1, breeds in

districts 2, 3, and 4, and occurs in winter in district 2.

299. CHETTUSIA GREGARIA (Pall.).
Vanellus gregarius, Severtzoff, p. 69.
Horizontal range. Occurs on passage in districts I., I.,

and III.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in districts 1 and 2.

300. Cuerrusia LeucURA (Licht.).

Vanellus leucurus, Severtzoff, p. 69.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts III. and IV.
Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1 and 2.

301. GLAREOLA PRATINCOLA, L.; Severtzoff, p. 69.
Horizontal range. Breeds in districts II., III., and IV.
Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1, 2, and 3, commonly

in district 2.

Dr. Severtzoff includes, without description, the following

subspecies of Glareola pratincola :—

Glareola pratincola 8. limbata.
Horizontal range. Breeds in districts III. and IV.
Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1, 2, and 3..

302. STREPSILAS INTERPRES (Linn.).
Strepsilas collaris, Severtzoff, p. 69.

Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan.’ 829

Horizontal range. Occurs in summer and on passage in
district ITT.

Vertical range. Occurs in summer.and on passage in dis-
trict 1.

303. Recurvirostra avocetta, L.; Severtzoff, p. 69.
Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I. and ILI.
Vertical range. Breeds in district 1.

304. Himantorus canpipus, Bonnat.

Hypsibates himantopus, Severtzoff, p. 69.

Horizontal range. Breeds in all four districts.

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1 and 2.

A subspecies, without description, is included under the
name of

Hypsibates himantopus 8. nigricollis.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts III. and IV.

Vertical range. Breeds in district 2.

305, 306. Ip1IpoRHYNCHUS STRUTHERSI, Gould.

(805) Falcirostra kauffmanni, Severtzoff, pp. 69, 146, pl. x.
figs. 1, 2.

Horizontal range. Resident in districts I. and IT,

Vertical range. Resident in districts 3 and 4, and occurs
during summer in district 5,

(306) Falcirostra longipes, Severtzoff, pp. 69, 147.

Horizontal range. Possibly resident and breeds in districts
I. and II.

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 3 and 4.

So far as I can ascertain, by comparing notes with Dr.

Severtzoff himself, both these refer to true J. struthersi. The

only difference or doubtful question is the fact that I. stru-
thersi has the upper tail-coverts black, and in Dr. Severtzoff’s
description the colour of these is not mentioned; and as he
did not bring with him any of his specimens, we were unable
to decide this, though there is very little doubt as to the
Turkestan bird being really referable to J. struthersi.

307. Hamatorpus ostratecus, L.; Severtzoff, p. 69.
_ Horizontal range. Breeds in district ITI.

Vertical range. Breeds rarely in district 2:
SER. III].—VOL. VI, i

SS ee SE

380 ~~ ‘Mr. R. Swinhoe on Birds from Hakodadi.

308. Scotopax Gattinaco (L.); Severtzoff, p. 69.

Horizontal range. Breeds and is found on passage in all
four districts, and occurs in winter in districts III. and IV.

Vertical range.. Occurs on passage in districts 1 and 2.

309. Scotopax HYEMALIs, Eversm.; Severtzoff, p. 69.

Horizontal range. Occurs in winter in all four districts, and
breeds in districts I. and IT.

Vertical range. Occurs in winter in district 2, breeds in
districts 3 and 4, and is found in summer in district 5.

No description is given of this Snipe; but in a MS. note
Dr. Severtzoff informs me that it is a good species, and, com-
pared with Scolopax solitaria, Hodgs., it differs slightly
though it very closely resembles that species.

310. ScoLtopax GALLINULA, L.; Severtzoff, p. 69.
Horizontal range. Occurs on passage in districts II., III.,
and IV.

Vertical range. Occurs rarely on passage in district 2.

311. Scotopax rusticoxa, L.; Severtzoff, p. 69.

Horizontal range. Occurs on passage in districts 1 TE,

and IV., rarely in the first two.
Vertical range. Occurs rarely on passage in districts 1 and 2.
[To be continued. ]

XXXI.—On the Contents of a third Box of Birds from Hako-
dadi, in Northern Japan. By R. Swinnor. -

(Plate VIII.)

A tHirp box of birds has come to hand from Mr. T. W.
Blakiston, from Hakodadi, Northern J apan, containing un-
fortunately only thirteen specimens, but accompanied by a
series of valuable notes, which I think will be acceptable to
the readers of ‘The Ibis,’ as throwing more light on the orni-
thology of North Japan. I will continue my numbers as
before from where I last left off (Ibis, 1875, p. 458).

Mr. Blakiston says that he has now a pair of Tinnunculus
Japonicus, and a specimen possibly of Accipiter gularis, but

Mr. R. Swinhoe on Birds from Hakodadi. 331

he has nothing to compare the latter with. Length 17%,
wing 98.

He mentions having received a male Osprey from Kam-
tchatka, giving its measurements 204x194. This, from its
large size, would appear to be the Pandion haliaétus (L.).

He also adds, “ Hirundo, an example from Kamtchatka,
agrees with Wilson’s description of H. americana 6,7} x 43.
(Baird’s description in ‘ Pacific R.R. Report,’ 1858, is im-
perfect.) Differs from H. gutturalis in having whole under-
parts, except breast-collar, fine bright chestnut, but lighter
than forehead and chin. ‘No white, except on tail-feathers,
which are also tinged. with chestnut. N.B. H. gutturalis is
sometimes tinged with light chestnut about the neck and
under wing-plumes.” This is Pallas’s Siberian variety of
Hirundo domestica (=H. rustica, .), to which he (Zoograph.
Rosso-Asiat. 1. p. 228) gives no specialname. Wilson’s name
is a synonym of H. horreorum, Barton (=H. erythrogaster,
Bodd.).

Blakiston notes Cypselus pacificus, but sends no specimen ;
so Ido not enter it under a number. Last time, he sent
Acanthylis caudacuta under this name; but this time I
think he is right. He says, “Only one example. Length
about 7 inches, wing 68. Upper parts dull sooty black, ex-
cept whiterump. Underparts same, with white on chin and at
end of its breast-feathers.”

127. Caprimuteus soTaka, T.& 8.
The wings and head of this species have come.

128. CERYLE RUDIS.

No specimen sent. “‘ Males and females do not differ ma-
terially.”” This is the first occurrence of this bird so far
north. I did not find it in China further north than the

-Yangtsze.

He asks if I was right in identifying the two Shrikes
he sent the last time, the one as Lanius bucephalus, the
other as L. superciliosus. If so, his specimen sent in 1862
was misnamed. I can vouch for mine being rightly de-

termined.
z2

332 Mr. R. Swinhoe on Birds from Hakodadi.

129. TurDUS NAUMANNI.

‘‘T have obtained this species for the first time this year.
It agrees exactly with my Shanghai specimen.” No bird
sent. He had his Shanghai specimen to identify it with; so
I think we can fairly enter it.

130. CaLaAMODYTA INSULARIS, Wallace.
A female of this Moluccan migrant received. Passes north
to breed.

131. ARUNDINAX BLAKISTONI, sp. nov. Plate VIII. fig. 1.
Upper parts brownish olive; underparts dusky vellowish,
on sides of breast brownish olive; a yellowish olive super-
cilium ; wing olive-brown, margined paler; tail brown, with

whitish tips; axillaries pale yellowish, with blackish mot-

tlings; dingier on yellow under tail-coverts. Upper man-
dible brownish, with yellowish edges; under yellowish, with
brownish tip; legs and lores yellowish brown. Length
4-7, wing 2°7, tail 2-1, tarse °85, first quill -48, second

‘15 shorter than third, narrow, 1°4 shorter than fourth, or

longest.

This is like a miniature A. fasciolatus, Gray ; and I took it
at first for Salvadori’s A. dorie; but Mr. Sharpe has lately
figured the latter m ‘The Ibis’ (1876, p. 41) from Borneo,
showing that Salvadori’s species is nothing more than the
Locustella ochotensis, Midd.,=L. rubescens, Blyth.

Blakiston adds, “I have two specimens similar to Cala-
modyta maacki; but they differ from one another too much.
Unfortunately the specimen I sent you in 1873 was lost; and
I must therefore keep these till I get duplicates.”

He further states, “I have also one specimen of what I
take to be Locustella subcerthiola; but the typical specimen
that. you identified was also lost in the ‘ Ariel.’” This may at
once he recognized from its resemblance to Savi’s Warbler,
Lusciniopsis savit.

132. PHyLLoscorpus xANTHODRYAS, Swinh. ?

‘I have a specimen of Willow-Wren which is much larger
than all my others. I put it down as distinct. It measures
D$x 2%, ¢. General appearance of P. coronata, but more

SS eee
——

Mr. R. Swinhoe on Birds from Hakodadi. 333

yellow on underparts.” I conjecture it to be the species
indicated. If I am right in my identification, this makes
three species of this group from Japan. I have seen P.
borealis, Blas., in the Leyden Museum, from Nagasaki; but
it is possible this may be the same as the last.
Blakiston states that he has two specimens of Motacilla
japonica from Kamtchatka, and one Emberiza rustica.

133. ScH@NICLUS PALLASI.

No bird sent.

““T have amale specimen distinct from S. yessoensis, 52 x 3,
black on throat separated from black on head by a white line
from corner of mouth; nape white.”

134. ScH@NICLUS PYRRHULINUS, sp.nov. Plate VIII. fig. 2.

The acquisition of the last species was needed to show how
this species originated. JI mentioned this species in my last
paper (Ibis, 1875, p. 451), and will now describe it. It is
a form of S. pallasi with Bullfinch-lke bill, just as the
European Black-headed Bunting has a similar form (S. pyr-
rhuloides) in Italy. Blakiston gives no particulars about it.
Length 5°5, wing 3:1, tail 4°7, tarsi °71.

135. URacus sIBIRICUS.

No specimen sent; but Blakiston refers to the number in
my list indicating this bird, writing, “ one specimen, 63 x 38,
g. Like a large edition of U. sanguinolentus. However, it
may only be a large race of that species, as the true U. si-
biricus differs in many respects of colour.”

He sends a specimen of Pica media from Kamtchatka, and
says that he has not as yet found the Magpie at all about
Hakodadi.

He sends a veritable Garrulus glandarius, L., and writes,
“JT have a Jay from Yedo, which I take to be G. lidthi. I
send a specimen of a Jay from amongst my collection, which
I imagine I must have got from you. .I have marked it [A],
and put it in so that I may explain the appearance of the
Yedo specimen. The Yedo bird has the back of the same
shade of colour, the black dashes on the crown rather larger,
and the white there more pure. The tail is quite black. No

33-4 Mr. R. Swinhoe on Birds from Hakodadi.

?* material difference on the underparts.” There can be no
doubt from his description that this is only Garrulus japo-
nicus*, and the larger bird, whose origin he cannot account
for, an ordinary English Jay, put into his collection by Mr.
Whitely before he left home for Japan.

He mentions a specimen from Yedo which he identifies —
with Turtur janthina, T.&S.. But he describesit as “in co-
lour like 7. humilis 9, but much larger. Length about 12,
wing 7. Delicate neutral tint on shoulder of wing.”’ It is
easy to see that he refers to the well-known Barbary Dove,
Turtur risorius, which has not yet been recorded from
Japan; but as we are on the birds of Northern Japan, we
will not give it a number.

He sends a specimen of Vanellus cristatus, which is also
not from Northern Japan, though probably found there as
well.

From Kamtchatka he records Totanus glareola, T. glottis,
Tringoides hypoleucus. No specimens sent.

186. NUMENIUS AUSTRALIS.

He sends a male of this species, and gives as measurements
of the fresh bird 213x114, bill along culmen 32. He also
gives the measurements of a female, 223 x 118, bill 33.

187. Numentius Masor, T. & S.
He has not sent this ; but from the measurements he gives
I take it to be this species, “ ? , 25 x 12, bill 8.”

He sends a specimen of Strepsilas interpres (L.) from the
neighbourhood of Yedo.

“Tringa damacensis, from near Yedo, seems larger than
China specimens. Length 104, wing 53, bill 12. Black on
breast in a large patch. I have never seen this bird from

* I will here add Bonaparte’s description of Garrulus hdthi from the
‘Consp. Av.’ (p. 376):—“ Rufo-vinaceus: capite colloque ex totis, alis,
rectricibusque, saturate azureis: fronte lorisque nigricantibus: plumis
gulee lanceolatis, barbulis disjunctis, rhachidibus albis; tectricibus alarum
nigro-fasciolatis : remigibus rectricibusque apicem versus nigricantibus,

apice ipso albo: cauda elongata, eequali. Rostrum longum, altum, valde
compressum.

Mr. R. Swinhoe on Birds from Hakodadi. 335

the north.” I take this to be the ordinary C. alpinus ; but it
is not easy to make out species of Tringa without actual
handling of specimens.

138. ARDEA CINEREA, L.
Immature specimen received.

139. Eeretra mopesta, G. R. Gray.

An Egret in winter plumage, with yellow bill, like our
China bird.

140. ArpETTA EURHYTHMA, Swinh.

A female sent.

“T have four specimens only, two females alike, of which
I send you one. A male of this species, I think, almost cer-
tainly, has a pure cinnamon back. Another male, evidently
another species, general colour of the large common Bittern,
bill not so stout as other species, and legs feathered to knee-
joint.” This may be Gorsachius melanolophus (Raffles) .

141. GALLINULA cHLOROPUS, L.
“Compared with English specimens ” (Blakiston).

142. Porzana exquisita, Swinh. Ibis, 1875, p. 135, pl. 111.*

Blakiston sends a female, and notes that “the male is just
the same.”

He notes that he has another species, of which he says,
« Another species, long toes, size about the same, bill larger.
This may be the Pigmy Crake.”

From Kamftchatka he has “ Anser segetum,, Spatula cly-
peata, Anas crecca, A. falcata, A. penelope, Clangula histri-
onica, and Somateria dispar; also Phaleris cristatella (Pall.),
Mormon cirrhatum (Pall.), Thalassidroma furcata (Gm.), and
Sterna?” The last he sends a bit of; but it is such a frag-
ment I cannot make it out.

He also notes from Kamtchatka “ Larus ridibundus. and
L. niveus.”

* [First described in 1873. Cf Swinh. Ann, & Mag. N. H. ser. 4, xii.
p. 376.—Ep. |

» 036 Lord Walden on the late Colonel Tickell’s

XX XII.—WNotes on the late Colonel Tickell’s manuscript Work
entitled “ Illustrations of Indian Ornithology.” By AxtTuHuR,
Viscount WALDEN.

(Plates IX., X.)

Amone the books of the Zoological Society’s library is to be
found the manuscript work alluded to. It was presented to
the Society by the late Colonel Tickell in 1874*, failing
health and obliterated sight having prevented him from car-
rying out the cherished object of his later years, its publication.
On Colonel Tickell’s career as an ornithologist it is not my
intention now to enter. An obituary by an old friend was

published last year+. Suffice it to say that he belonged to_

that band of zoologists who, more than forty years ago, com-
menced in India the then much neglected study of natural
history, and who worshipped as simple and single-minded de-
votees in the temple of nature, and not for their own self-
glorification. Beyond a couple or so of paperst, I am not
aware that he published in any scientific periodical any ob-
servations on birds. His collections were generally sent to
Blyth at Calcutta, some of the examples with MS. titles at-
tached, under which that able zoologist usually made them
known in the pages of the ‘ Proceedings’ of the Asiatic So-
ciety of Bengal§. Being gifted with a ready pencil and a
facile brush, Colonel Tickell, in most instances, made coloured
drawings of the animals he secured ; and in the course of time
he had accumulated many drawings, together with copious
notes relating to the species he had captured or observed.
Some of his first efforts were lost, including several sketches
without which, it is to be feared, one or two of his earlier
species must remain unidentified. A part of the materials he
brought to England were thrown together and form the work

* P.Z.9. 1874, p. 667.

+ ‘Field’ newspaper, June 1875.

t J. A.S. B. 1883, pp. 569-583, 1859, pp. 448-456; Ibis, 1864, pp. 173-

182. His later articles in the ‘Field, subscribed Sats the pseudonym

of “Ornithognomon,” are probably well known to the readers of the
‘ Field.’
§ Not always. Conf. Tickell, Ibis 1863, p. 111.

MS. “TIilustrations of Indian Ornithology.” 337

to which I now propose to call attention. The original in-
tention seems to have been to make his proposed work a
complete history of Indian ornithology ; but illness and other
circumstances prevented this laudable object from being at-
tained ; consequently the Gallinacee, the Gralla, the Anseres,
the Insessores, the Sylviitde, the Paride and kindred genera,
and the Conirostres are wholly wanting*.

The work consists of seven small folio volumes, the title-
page of each being printed, while the whole of the letter-press
is most neatly written by hand. The characters of the orders,
families, and genera Colonel Tickell adopts are given in detail ;
and each genus is illustrated by accurately drawn outlines
. Showing, in most instances, the bill, feet, and wing-structure.
These outlines are drawn with the very greatest care, and in
each case to scale, and not by eye alone. Every species per-
sonally known to the author is figured; and many of the
plates are works of art. It may be affirmed that nearly all
are good, and that many are almost perfection. While the
ornithological characters of nearly every species are accurately
rendered, the attitude of each bird discloses how well Colonel
Tickell observed and how closely he studied nature. The
attractiveness .of the plates is moreover much enhanced by
the backgrounds in which the figures are set. A knowledge
of the haunts and habits of each species can almost be ac-
quired by studying the accessories of each figure. Every
plate is a highly finished landscape, true to nature, often
enlivened by scenes from every-day life in India, either
in the plains or in the jungle, in town or in cantonments.
After the monotonous uniformity of the conventional back-

* While this paper was passing through the press I was favoured by
General Boyd and the Rey. E. A. Tickell with an opportunity of ex-
amining all the original drawings and notes in their possession from which
Colonel Tickell elaborated the more complete work under notice. They are
bound up in two folio and three quarto volumes, and comprise notices
and coloured drawings of many more species than are to be found in the
Zoological Society’s copy, many of them relating to birds belonging to
the orders and families there omitted. I have not had time to thoroughly
examine these volumes; but a cursory inspection has satisfied me that an
account of their contents may be of use and interest to ornithologists.

ER Ee REE a er igang ee
ee - See ee
— tet eees rote

ae et
a

iro ee

Sis Qantas Tp ee ee Sex

*
—--« = - - —— a oo os - > «
DO as 1 SS 1 em ae i a
> et ee ee =t
=e et
“me —
—-
r= - =< & ~~ 7 ™,
i. —= =
= a

EA Seca Sarg nee ee ae
=

m™
‘

, 008 Lord Walden on the late Colonel Tickell’s

grounds of illustrated English ornithological works, it is a
relief and a pleasure to find every bird surrounded by real
leaves, pecking at real flowers, or climbing real trees, or with
real Indian burtdings and Indian animals in the distance.
The drawing of Milvus govinda sitting on the cornice of a town
house, that of Hirundo javanica clinging to its nest under
the eaves of an up-country bungalow, or that of Hirundo
erythropygia skimming over the marsh where a sportsman
has just dropped a Snipe, startling the black buffaloes in the

foreground, may be cited, at random, as instances of the

artist’s art. But asif his beautiful drawings were not a suffi-
cient adornment to the work, Colonel Tickell has appended
to most of the pages descriptive of the genera small oval .
vignettes, done in Indian ink, illustrating the customs and
ways of the people, the incidents of an Indian officer’s life in
quarters, in camp, and on the march, out shooting or out
visiting, bits of nature in the jungle, a tiger creeping up to
children by the river-side, a wild elephant wading down a
shallow stream by moon-light, scene after scene recalling to
the Anglo-Indian at home memories of his Indian sojourn.
In some, tragic subjects are vividly depicted :—a victim of
jealousy, the body of a woman lying on the ground hacked
with many tulwar-cuts, an infant by the dead mother’s side,
the pompous Kutwal, surrounded by officials, making his in-
vestigations; a Meriah, a human sacrifice, the victim tied
to a post, head hanging down, men and women tearing and
cutting the flesh off the still living body. In other scenes
a keen sense of humour is displayed :—an officer just ar-
rived at a sporting rendezvous in the jungle, some fifteen
miles away, and the shikarree addressing him, “ Your Lord-
ship! cherisher of the poor! governor of the country !
you are my father! you are God himself! The powder is
forgotten ”’*.

Some ninety-four of these clever sketches are scattered
through five of the seven volumes; two hundred and sixty
plates of birds, and seven plates containing figures of the

_* Khodawund. Ghurreeb rurwur. Moolook Malik. Ap ma bap hye.
Ap Khoda hye. Baroot bhoolgya!

Ms. ‘Illustrations of Indian Ornithology.’ 339

eggs of forty-two -species, complete the illustrations. The
notices of species, of which the letterpress mostly consists,
may be divided under two heads—descriptions and accounts
of those species known to Colonel Tickell, and descriptions.
of species unknown to him and copied from other authors.
On these last I do not propose to observe; but I will endea-
vour to give a general idea of those parts of the work which
_ are original. Want of space prevents my doing justice to all
the plates, or to the many interesting accounts of habits
which render the work so valuable. Indeed, if I only succeed
in drawing the attention of ornithologists to the work itself,
my principal object will have been attained. It is a sad
reflection that ill health prevented so much patient in-
dustry, so much unostentatious labour, so much artistic skill,
so much enthusiasm in the good cause, so great a fidelity to
nature, from being rewarded with that universal approbation
publication would undoubtedly have secured.

The first two volumes embrace respectively the Raptrores
Drurni and the Raprores nocturni. On forty-one plates,
contained in volume 1., are depicted the better-known Indian
and Burman species of Accipitres; but, with the exception of
Limnaéius.kienert and Falco peregrinator, none of the rarer
forms are delineated. Six species of Vultures are admirably
figured. Otogyps calvus is stated to occur as commonly in
Arracan and Burma as in Central India and the Madras Pre-
sidency, Gyps indicus to be common in Burma, and Gyps
bengalensis spread all over that country.

Aquila imperialis (heliaca), 9 ad. and young in its third
year, both from Bengal, constitute the first two plates be-
longing to the Eagles. An adult male of Aquila nevia, Gm.
apud Jerdon (B. Ind. no. 28), from Daulan, Tenasserim, is
figured ; and the species is stated to be not uncommon in
suitable localities in that province. The next plate is entitled
Aquila fulvescens? and a good plate of the Hmorungee (M-
saétus fasciatus) feeding on a Black Partridge is followed by
one containing two figures of the Limnaétus niveus (T.), apud
Jerd. (B. Ind. no. 34), in plumage which Colonel Tickell cha-
racterizes as that of the third or fourth moult. The one is

Sarre

ig ee ne
ee Sa ea — = —s-
=— 5 cs

- 840 Lord Walden on the late Colonel Tickell’s

“represented pure white underneath, with (including the ter-
minal) five caudal bands; the other with the under-surface
plumage marked with brown drops, the thigh-coverts with
the usual transverse bars, and the rectrices with only four
bands.

Falco lathami (Tickell*, J. A. S. B. 1833, p. 569) 1s inci-
dentally alluded to in the article on Limnaétus cristatellus (T.).
This is the passage :—‘‘I shot a Hawk-Hagle in 1833-34 in
the jungles of Seheria, Borabhoom (Bengal), which Jerdon
considers may possibly be referred to this species ; but of this
I am very doubtful, as it was noted by me at the time as
only 18 inches in length. It had a fine long occipital crest,
black, with white tips. Head, nape, and wing-coverts clouded
with ashy and rusty. Back clouded with brown. Lower parts
white, with a streak of black down the centre of the throat,
and with rusty bars on the breast and belly. A drawing
made of it at the time was lost by the sinking of my boat in
the Ganges ; and I have never met with the bird again, al-
though I often subsequently traversed and explored those
vast forests.”

Jerdon has suggested that F. lathami, Tickell, might have
been founded on a young example of L. kieneri, or perhaps
on Astur trivirgatust. The description may have been taken

* It is not to be concluded with any certainty, from the way Colonel
Tickell introduces this name (/.c.), that he was bestowing an original
title of his own on an undescribed species. The internal evidence is the
other way. The species.is the first of the list, and is entered thus :—
“J, Fauco LATHAMI. Colvy Falcon? LatHamM ;” and then follows the de-
scription. The Colvy (Cohy) Falcon of Latham is unquestionably B. lo-
photes; and on Latham’s plate (G. H.i.t.10) Mr. G. R. Gray had some four
years previously founded his F. lathami (Griff. ed. of Cuy. An. King.
Aves, i. p. 80). It is only at the third species in the list that Colonel
Tickell begins to bestow titles of his own; and to the name of this species,
Falco herbecola, the following footnote is attached :—“ The names of such
birds as have never come under my notice before, and are necessarily of
my own coining, I have distinguished by the addition of a T.” All
through the paper the letter T is added to a new title; but it is wanting
after the title F. lathamt.

+ L. kienert ad. was obtained at Oorkhia, in Singbhoom, by Colonel
Tickell; with Astur trivirgatus he was well acquainted.

MS. “Illustrations of Indian Ornithology.” 341

from a young male of L. albiniger, aspecies, in adult plumage,
by the way, which Colonel Tickell describes as a variety of
L. cristatellus. Myr. Sharpe (Cat. Accipitres, p. 352) iden-
tifies F. lathami, and without a doubt, with Baza lophotes.
There is something to be said in favour of this opinion, but
not enough to establish it. In favour, there is the fact that
Colonel Tickell again refers to F. lathami in his article on
Baza lophotes,; a species, however, of which he was ignorant
in the adult plumage. As the young he describes, with a
note of interrogation, the bird he had obtained in 18383 in
Borabhoom, adding to the description the words “ Tickell’s
Falco lathami, 1833.” And he goes on to observe, ‘The
above description is taken entirely from Jerdon ; for the adult
I have never seen, and the (by me supposed) young I lost
my notes and drawing of; but a slight description was sent
by me, in a ‘ List of Birds collected in the Jungle Mahals,’ to
the Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal in 1833, of a
bird shot by mein Seheria, Manbhoom (West Bengal), which,
to the best of my recollection, closely resembles Baza lo-
photes in an immature plumage, and most certainly was not
a Limnaétus, nor an Astur as suggested by Jerdon.”’ But
Colonel Tickell had no previous or subsequent certain know-
ledge of Baza lophotes in any phase of plumage ; and he there-
fore could not possibly judge whether the bird he referred to
F. lathami was the young of B. lophotes or not. In opposi-
tion to Mr. Sharpe’s identification, we have these two incon-
venient facts: first, Tickell’s bird measured 18 inches in
length, and in expanse 40 inches; and, secondly, the legs
are described as being “ clothed with short white feathers to
the feet, which are of a horny colour.” The first character
tells, and the last would tell conclusively, against Colonel
Tickell’s bird having belonged to B. lophotes, were it not for
the inconsistent sentence which follows—‘“ exposed part of
the tarsi reticulated.” No description of B. lophotes in first
plumage appears to have been published ; nor have I ever met
with examples.

A mature female of L. kieneri, from Darjeeling, is well
figured; and the title albogularis, Tickell (J. A. S. B. 1842,

iol pine een ae
vaso

a eee Seer ee

SS eee

—s = ;

i
{

ih
als
Wh
Pag eee
plat
ae
rhea
ye
4\j
Wh
on}
‘
"
tt
y
f
itt}
it
ns
ny
ih
:
a
y
}
i
shi
ie

(ToL Aste
np a ek

"pete Se

342 Lord Walden on the late Colonel Tickell’s

p. 456), is admitted to be synonymous. Polioaétus icthyaétus,
adult female and young bird, is well given, from Tenasserim
examples, and is stated to be the commonest Kagle in Burma
and Tenasserim ; and two beautiful plates represent Haliaétus
fulviventer, from Malda, and H. leucogaster, from Akyab.
Among the drawings of the Hawks, A. trivirgatus 2. juv. ex
Singbhoom, M. badius 3 ad. ex Tenasserim (polopsis, Hume),
A. nisus 9 ad. from Darjeeling, and A. virgatus, young of
second year, from Hazaribagh, find a place. Falco nisosimilis,
Tickell (J. A. 8. B. 1833, p. 571), is not alluded to, beyond
being quoted as a synonym of A. nisus, according to Jerdon.

Eight different species of Falcons form the subjects of as
many plates, the most interesting being, perhaps, F. peregri-
nator, of which a mature female and a young example are
figured on the same plate. Colonel Tickell states that it is
a commoner species in Burma than in India, and that he
had “frequently observed it on the sea-side at Amherst,
where two or three pairs of these birds breed every cold
season, building on the high Gurjan oil-trees along the
shore.” The plate of the common Indian Kite, WM. govinda,
may be cited as one of the most-charming and characteristic
in the volume. Butastur teesa, from a Tenasserim female, is
figured on the same plate with a Bengal male; and the species
is said to be more common in Burma than in Bengal.

Faico herbecola, Tickell* (J. A. 8. B. 18338, p. 570), is iden-
tified with Circus swainsonit @ , a position assigned to it with
doubt by Blyth (Cat. Cale. Mus. no. 90), and with certainty
by Jerdon (B. Ind. no. 51).

The second volume contains twenty-one plates, on which
nineteen species of Owls are depicted. A figure of a nestling
example of Syrnium indranee, obtained in Tenasserim, leads
off. The ochraceous colour of the disk is plainly indicated.
Following a fair plate of Syrniwm seloputo, from Tenasserim,
is an admirable drawing of S. nivicolum, from Darjeeling,
and then good figures of Bubo bengalensis and coromandus,
from Bengal. The next represents the type of Tickell’s

* T cannot find any notice of this title in the British-Museum Cata-
logue, Accipitres (1874), :

D
id

1amMy

anhart

& NLA

1
lV
.

ATUS

i ee
ry

hth.

LIEMAnNs

MS. Illustrations of Indian Ornithology.” 343

genus Ptiloskelos and species P. amherstii (J. A. 8. B. 1859,
p- 448), which Mr. Blyth, at the time, correctly identified with
Huhua orientalis juv. (¢. c. p. 411, note). Ketupa ceylonensis,
with the title of Strax dumeticola, Tickell (J. A. S. B. 1833),
admitted as a synonym, and K. javanensis, are both figured,
the latter from a Tenasserim adult male. A plate is devoted
to Scops pennatus under the title of Ephialtes scops, and an-
other to the young bird; and Scops sunia, from Tirhoot, is
described and figured as a distinct species. Athene radiata*,
Tickell, is stated to be “met with throughout the forest
portion and lower hills of Arakan, Burma, and Tenasserim ;”
and of Glaucidium brodeit Colonel Tickell remarks that while
‘Darjeeling and Tenasserim birds do not differ in plumage,
“nevertheless it is remarkable that the notes of the bird in
these two countries differ considerably.”

Volume iil. treats on the ZycopactyLi, and contains forty-
six plates. Of these, five belong to the Parrots, twenty-one
to the Woodpeckers, including Sasia, Vivia, and Yunz, five
to the Barbets, and fifteen to the Cuckoos.

Paleornis javanicus (melanorhynchus) ; figured from a cage-
bird, is represented with a red}, instead of yellow, wing-patch,
the part being described of an Indian-yellow colour. The
male and female are stated to have the upper mandible red,
the under black, but the young to have the bill black, “‘ which
colour the female retains ¢2// full maturity.”

Picus atratus, Blyth, g 2 (Plate IX.), is figured; and the
male is for the first time described. But both description and
figure of the male are taken from an immature example, the
scarlet on the head only reaching the vertex, whereas in the
adult this colour covers the crown and occiput as well. ‘The
fulvous grey colouring of the frontal plumes of the female is
somewhat exaggerated in hue and extent. PP. atratus is not
unlike P. macei, but is distinguished by having the uropygium

* Tickell’s specific denomination of radiata (J. A. S. B. 1833, p. 572)
for this Owl was, by misprint, converted into that of undulata by Blyth
(J. A. S. B. 1842, p. 457).

+ It is so described by Jerdon (B. Ind. i. no. 152),

344 ~ Lord Walden on the late Colonel Tickell’s

uniform black, and not marked with white, and by the bold
dark brown or black mesial stripes on the pectoral feathers.

Picus majoroides is represented witha large white patch on
the middle of the back, which is not quite true to nature, the
nape, back, uropygium, and upper tail-coverts in this species
being uniform black.

In Picus mahrattensis (auro-cristatus, Tickell, J. A.S.B.
- 1833, p. 579, 2) neither the crimson occiput of the male nor
the yellow occiput of the female is represented in the plate.
The fact that Hemicercus canente 2 has the forehead creamy
buff, and not the male, is confirmed by the figure given of
“an undoubted female” by Colonel Tickell.

The little-known Meiglyptes jugularis is described and
figured from a Tenasserim example of a so-called male; but
the red cheek-stripe is omitted.

Having figured and described individuals of the Tenke:
serim race of Tiga shori (T. intermedia, Blyth), Colonel
Tickell gives a plate and description of a distinct species of
the same genus, obtained in the forests on the Teesta river,
Sikim. Under the title of Chrysonotus biddulphi it is thus
described :—“ Iris labelled ‘hazel.’ Bull and legs blackish
neutral. Crown, crest, and entire nape, as well as lower
back, silky scarlet. Forehead, ramus, and throat, and all
foreneck pale brown. Rest of face andneck white. A black
line from hinder rim of eye down across the auriculars to the
scarlet of nape, which it borders-for a short space. Another
line from rictus down latero-frontal neck. Another along
lower edge of ramus, joining the rictal stripe at end of ramus.
And another branching from the last midway on ramus and
- joining the rictal-stripe lower down neck. All breast and
lower parts as in shorii, but with browner edges to the fea-
thers; upper parts the same, but. a broad black band runs
across top of back and separates the scarlet and white of nape
and neck from the gold-yellow of upper parts. Wing 6),
Tail 43 (beyond wing 1$). Billl}. Tarsus1. Inn. toe 14.”
This form does not appear to have been since recognized.

Cyanops franklini, from Mooleyit range, Tenasserim, is
described and figured with the superciliary stripe unspotted
black, the typical form.

MS. “Illustrations of Indian Ornithology.” 345

Two birds are figured on the next plate, one being named
Megalaima indica (Lath.), and called by Colonel Tickell the
Village Barbet, the other M. philippensis, Temm., and which
he terms the Jungle Barbet. Both figures represent X. hema-
cephala; and as Colonel Tickell admits that the Village and the
Jungle Barbets “are precisely similar in shape and colour,”
the object of giving a duplicate figure of the same bird is not
obvious. They are, however, stated to differ in habits and
voice ; and the dimensions of the Jungle Barbet, as given, are
a trifle greater. This bird, Colonel Tickell states, is only
found in deep lofty forests in Tenasserim ; and he syllabicizes
the notes of the two birds.

Phenicophaés curvirostris (erythrognathus) is described and
figured from individuals met with on the Mooleyit range. In
plumage the sexes are stated to be alike; but while the iris
of the male is noted as cobalt-blue, that of the female is stated
to be orange. Colonel Tickell remarks that the species feeds
on insects, and not on fruits. .

An example of.a species of Centropus obtained at Hazari-
bagh, Bengal, is figured and described with the scapular in-
terspace of the back coloured like the wings. It probably
falls under C. intermedius, Hume. A Darjeeling adult ex-
ample, and a young bird from Chota Nagpore, of Cuculus
- micropterus are represented under the title of C. striatus.
The plate of Cuculus sparverioides contains a figure of a
female whose plumage is in the hepatic stage, the tail ex-
cepted, which is that of the fully adult bird.

Together with the adult, Polyphasia rufiventris, in hepatic
barred plumage, is depicted, both from Burman examples.
The latter is described as a separate species under the title
of C. castaneus. Colonel Tickell treats P. rufiventris and P.
passerinus as being merely varieties of one species, which he
identifies with C. merulinus, Scop. The first he terms the Indo-
Chinese variety, the other the Indian variety.

The plumage, which in the Emerald Cuckoo (C. maculatus)
of India and Burma assumes the brilliant green colouring
of the adult, is known to be more or less rufous in the
young bird, the rufous colouring passing into coppery green

SER. III.—VOL. VI. a

346 Lord Walden on the late Colonel Tickell’s

before becoming emerald-green, Similar transitions take
place in the colouring of the plumage of C. xanthorhynchus.
The barred and rufous stage is succeeded by one in which
the rufous colour is replaced by coppery green, which then
passes into a darker and purer green, then turns into violet
or blue amethystine before finally assuming the amethystine
hue of the fully adult plumage. An example of C. xan-
thorhynchus, obtained at Rangoon, passing. over from the
rufous and coppery green stage to the violet and amethys-
tine adult dress, is well figured by Colonel Tickell. He,
however, considers that C. maculatus is in what he terms
the “first adult” dress, and that C. xanthorhynchus repre-
sents the “second adult, or old bird” of the same species—
a conclusion which is contrary to the known facts. C. xan-
' thorhynchus, a smaller bird than C. maculatus, is a Malayan
species which ranges as far north as Hill Tipperah, and occurs
in the Andamans. C. maculatus is an Indian species, and
found not-tncommonly in Pegu and Siam (C. schomburgki).
In fully adult plumage it has the chin and throat, but not
the breast, unbarred emerald-green, like the upper plumage.

To the TenurrostREs, as understood by Colonel Tickell, are
devoted volume iv., with thirty-two plates. By him this
tribe is made to include the Sititzde, Nectariniude, and genera
such as Zosterops, lora, Phyllornis, Yuhina, Myzornis, Her-
pornis and Oriolus, Irena and Upupa.

One of the most finished drawings in the work is that of
Certhia discolor, taken from a Darjeeling example. That of
Sitta formosa is not so happy, while the characters whereby
Sitta cinnamomeoventris is distinguished from S. castanei-
ventris are successfully portrayed on the plate representing
the two species ; and, together with that of S. himalayensis,
the tails are separately sketched in Indian-ink. The lovely
Dendrophila frontalis (Horsf.) is worthily depicted from two
Tenasserim examples. Mr. Sharpe has (Str. Feath. 1875,

p. 486) recently stated that the Javan bird differed specifi-
cally from the continental S. corallina, Hodgs. The cha-
racters relied on are “the under surface being more richly
coloured, and the throat being lilac-brown, like the breast,’’

MS. “Illustrations of Indian Ornithology.” 347

while “the Himalayan bird is larger, and is always to be dis-
tinguished by its white throat.” The Javan bird seems to
be generally somewhat smaller ; but in all other respects I am
unable to affirm that the characters stated are constant: an
adult Javan example in my collection has the throat as white
as continental individuals ; and the under surface is not more
richly coloured.

A well-executed figure of Arachnothera magna, from a
Darjeeling example, introduces the Nectariniide. Colonel
Tickell mentions having, on two occasions, obtained this
species in Tenasserim. Captain Beavan obtained it at.Moul-
mein (P. Z. S. 1866, p. 540). Mr. Blyth enumerates it (B.
Burma, No. 485) as a Tenasserim and Arracan species; and
specimens collected by Mr. Davison at Kyouknyat and near
Yé, are identified with it by Mr. Hume (Str. F. u. p. 473).
We may therefore assume that the Himalayan bird, and not
the nearly allied A. aurata of Pegu, inhabits Tenasserim.

The identification of Nectarinia seherie, Tickell (J. A.S8. B.
1838, p.577), has, since its description, remained a matter of
uncertainty ; and in great hopes of finding materials suffi-
ciently conclusive to settle the disputed point, I turned to
Colonel Tickell’s later observations in this work. thopyga
miles (Hodgson) is the title he adopts for the first species of the
genus described ; and, as a synonym, among others, he adds
N. seheria, Tickell. The plate, on which the two sexes are
figured, is also entitled 4. miles, followed by the locality where
the subject of the plate was procured, as is generally done
throughout the work. This locality is stated thus—“ Seheria,
Borabhoom, Bengal, 1833.” Here, on the face of it, we have a
figure of the type; but on turning to the letterpress this con.
tradictory passage occurs, “‘The individual here figured was
procured in the Tongu-ngoo district, Burma,’ Jn his ori-
ginal account of the discovery of N. seherie@ (1. c.), and in the
letterpress in this work, where that account is given in much
the same words, no mention is made of-a female having been
obtained ; and yet a female is figured as being from Seheria,
Nor in the letterpress is it mentioned where the female
figured on the plate, and described in the diagnosis of Z,

RAR

848 Lord Walden on the late Colonel Tickell’s

miles, came from. Fortunately, an examination of the figure
of the male, together with Colonel Tickell’s later deseription,
leaves no doubt that the bird he had before him was the
Tenasserim and Tonghoo form of Athopyga miles, recently
named by Mr. Hume (“if really new”) Athopyga cara (Str.
F. ii. p. 478, note). It is the . miles (Hodgs.), apud
Walden (P. Z.8. 1866, p. 541), ex Moulmein and the Salween
river, obtained by Captain Beavan, and also the 4. miles,
apud Blyth (B. Burma, no. 491). In‘ The Ibis’ (1870, p. 82)
I drew attention to some of the characters which seemed to dis-
tinguish the Moulmein form of 4. miles ; but, rather than risk
adding a useless synonym, | refrained from naming it. Lately
Captain Shelley kindly informed me that he was of opinion that
my Burman example belonged to a species distinct from 4.
miles; and a careful comparison I have since made convinces
me that Captain Shelley is justified in thinking that the Bur-
man form should be specifically separated. It is a species
intermediate between 44. miles and AL. eupogon, as will be
seen by the following key :—

AY, miles. Cap, rectrices, and upper tail-coverts dark metallic green ;
violet moustachial stripe simple; base of lower throat-feathers black.

44. cara. Cap and upper tail-coverts green ; rectrices dark steel-blue,
tinted with violet; base of lower throat-feathers white; violet mous-
tachial stripe simple.

AL. eupogon. Cap, upper tail-coverts, and rectrices metallic violet;
base of lower throat-feathers white; violet moustachial stripe internally
margined with black.

N. seherie roust still therefore be looked for in Borabhoom ;
but as Colonel Tickell identifies it with 4. miles, and as his
original description of the Borabhoom bird agrees to the
letter with 4. miles, I have little doubt that N. seherie=
44. miles, in which case Colonel Tickell’s title will have pre-
cedence.

The remaining Himalayan species of Aithopyge are all
beautifully figured. But Anthothreptus malaccensis, 3 2,
‘locality not known,” is figured under the erroneous title of
N. zeylonica, and A. flammawillaris 8, ex Rangoon, under
the incorrect name of N. jugularis. Nectarophila hasseltii,

°°

MS. “Illustrations of Indian Ornithology.” 349

3 2, ex Akyab, and Chalcoparia phenicotis, § ex Akyab,
? ex Tongungoo, adorn the last two plates, representing
the true Sun-birds.

The next two plates contain figures of (according to Colonel
Tickell) five distinct species of the Diceine. Figure 1, on
the first plate, is entitled Diceum minimum, Tickell, and stated
to have been drawn from a male example obtained at Yé.
As described, the bird may be D. minimum; but as figured, it
is certainly D. cruentatum 2 vel gjuv. The upper tail-
coverts are coloured red in the plate; and so is the base of
the bill. The figure does not represent Tickell’s type ob-
tained in the Saul jungles of Borabhoom and Dhalbhoom,
but a totally distinct bird.

The second figure is of D. cruentatum g adult; and the
third (which completes the plate) is entitled “ Diceum chry-

sorheum, 'Temm., ¢, Yé, Tenasserim.” As described, this is
pi trigonostigma 2 vel @ juv., and agrees well with Moul-
mein and Malaccan examples. As depicted, the species is
difficult to identify, the yellowish green back and striated
throat, breast, and flanks recalling D. chrysorrheum. No
description of D. trigonostigma 2 appears to have been
published; and I therefore give one, and also a figure of
it (Plate IX. fig. 2). Chin, throat, upper breast, and
cheeks pale ashy grey, palest on the chin and throat, which
sometimes are tinged with yellow. Remainder of breast,
abdomen, flanks, and under tail-coverts more or less yel-
low, inclining on the mesial line to pale orange. Plu-
mage of upper surface ashy, in some tinged with olive-
green throughout, in others almost pure ashy on the head,
nape, and wing-coverts. Uropygium tinged with yellow, and
upper tail-coverts almost orange-ochre. Quills dark brown,’
edged with ashy olive-green. Rectrices dark brown. Axil-
laries and under wing-coverts silky white. Inner edges of
the quills, for a part of their length, white ; outer edges grey
or silvery white. D. trigonostigma ? vel g juv. is exceed-
ingly like D. virescens, Hume, ¢ ?, ex Andamans (Str. F.
18738, p. 482); and it may be that the specimens obtained at
Pahpoon and neighbourhood by Mr. Davison, and identified

ree > a a “2
eS SS SN —— —= = v= === : = ;

a ee ee

ie Sa

a
sna --p a

a aioe

=r SE SS ep Se PEST
- signe Sates = AP

De ees on ee eee at

<~ +

- i
aa
Pree
wf
7 q iJ ’
") 2 ; weed
; " i mak
ABN T bl wh
é J : 43 i
: ! hy Al
Fj ie ae ;
bE i }
LH hy |) ey | /
At ‘i a i
ait The Ty |
‘y ‘Vie : '
; « 7 | ‘a
‘ ave it Ate |
viel) @ |
i { 4
i
‘al t id
i muvee 4
AP \}
Lia } eae
Veet fie
pets aaa if
| A ]
ro :
ey) ie j
, ae !
| +36 |
oe thy mal } |
TM LIAN sf ‘|
| ey et is
ee | |
ye et ye}
,) ) 4 1
a, | Ai
; Ai} 4 |
+ TRUS ae ae
Ue
- ee | t ‘ y
} i
ay )a,\4
ity
ia ey We {
t AVE
wes j (i
} }
reeeia i
SH sal i
1 ee } }
1 i | ¥
Ma A
5 ik)
van 4]
wits
' We
wy
i
ve
A) >
dolly,
ia
ie |
jee Fi
t *
ate fi He!)
ele ay
| ioe
je dilt
| ane H {
iit }
i ] i b
eat i
ht
% ol
4 15)
Vy a f
Wh
{4}
1h dal
th
ir ‘e
Pes
ier
} i
1B
\
OS Ph)
i
{lh ae
vb t
Pe By
men
4
‘
Ww i
4
ge
ih
| :
BANE
pA
a
4
]
ith
Vy
i 1
-
4 ;
uth
J \
+] I
:
| {
}
'
; f
i i mr |
} i}
Hi i
|
j
t}
We
: M7 |
pat *
j i
Med
‘ we
4
dud
-

350 Lord Walden on the late Colonel Tickell’s

by Mr. Hume with D. virescens (Str. ¥. 1874, p. 473), belong
t» D. trigonostigma ¢. |

The second plate of the Diczinz contains two figures :—
No. 1, entitled Piprisoma agile, ex Borabhoom; No. 2, Pri-
onochilus gordoni, Tickell, ex Mergui. This last is Diceum
trigonostigma* 8.

It is difficult to assume that Colonel Tickell would figure a
different species under a title he was the first to give to a bird he
first discovered ; and yet it is impossible to recognize his figure
of Piprisoma agile as belonging to that species. His delinea-
tions are generally not only so beautiful, but so accurate, that
we cannot permit ourselves to doubt that his figure of P. agile
is a good representation of the bird it was drawn fromt+. The
bill is that of a true Diceum; and the coloring and markings
more nearly resemble those of D. chrysorheum than any other
species. It is certainly not Piprisoma agile. Can it be the
Prionochilus modestus, Hume (Str. F. 1875, p. 298), possibly
founded on female or immature males of some known species
of the genus? In the letterpress Colonel Tickell correctly
describes P. agile; but the bird figured has the upper plumage
yellowish olive-green, without a trace of ashy, the upper tail-
coverts more yellow than olive, and the whole under svirface
albescent, with longitudinal streaks of olive-brown.

Zosterops siamensis, Blyth (Ibis, 1867, p. 34), is well feured
and described by Colonel Tickell, from the Mooleyit range,
under the title of, and confounded with, Z. palpebrosa, T.
As I cannot find that Blyth ever described this species in
preciser terms than those given in the short passage where
he bestowed that title (/.c.), I append a short description
and give a figure of the bird (Plate IX. fig. 1). Above yel-
low olive-green, the yellow tint being prominent and most
developed on the uropygium and upper tail-coverts, forehead,
and space before the eye; underneath, axillaries, and under
wing-coverts bright yellow ; quills and rectrices pale brown,
edged more or less with the colour of the back. Lores

* Colonel Tickell was not acquainted with the genus Prionochilus.
7 It has been already shown that the subjects of the plates do not
always helong to the subjects of the letterpress, e.g. D. minimum.

J.GKeulemans hth

1. ZOSTEROPS SIAMENSIS
2.DICAKUM TRIGONOSTIGMA, .

M&N.Hanhart Imp,

MS. “Illustrations of Indian Ornithology.”’ 351

black, which colour extends to below the eye. Wing 1°95.
Z. austeni, is an allied form of greater dimensions, above
olive-green, without a yellow tint, and with only the chin,
throat, and under tail-coverts clear yellow.

Colonel Tickell’s observations on Jora zeylanica and J. typhia,
which species are both figured on the succeeding plate, do
not throw any light on the mystery which envelops their
mutations of plumage. He seems to have simply recognized
them as constituting two distinct species. J. zeylanicu
3, from Moulmein, is represented with the head and nape
changing to black, and the scapulars unmargined black.
I. typhia 8, from Hazaribagh, is in typical plumage. Jora
lafresnayt 9, from a specimen shot by Colonel Tickell at
Aseen, near Yé, is fairly depicted; and he states that it is a
rarer bird than the two other species.

To the Leaf-birds (Phyllornis) four plates are assigned.
On the first P. jerdont 3, ex Moulmein, and ¢, ex Pyntee,
Bengal, are stated to be figured. The occurrence of P. jer-
dont in Tenasserim is extremely doubtful, although the figure
agrees best with that species. As described, both birds be-
long to P. chlorucephalus. The example of P.javensis, which
Colonel Tickell discovered on the Mooleyit range in 1855
(J. A. S. B. xxiv. p. 277), is figured; its Tenasserim habitat has
been since confirmed by Mr. Davison, who found it at Yé.

The plates and accounts given of the species belonging to
the genera Yuhina, Oriolus, Irena, and Upupa, with which
the volume closes, offer no matter for remark beyond this,
that the figure of Psarolophus trailli, ex Darjeeling, applies
better to P. ardens.

The next two volumes, v. and vi., contain the DenrrrostRrzes,
vol. v. being restricted to the Laniidz and the Muscicapide,
with thirty-eight plates.

The Burman Volvocivora avensis, Blyth, is figured from
Tenasserim examples under the title of V. fimbriata (T.).

The particoloured middle pair of rectrices found in certain
examples of Pericrocotus speciosus, more especially among
those from Assam and Burma, have been regarded by some
as constituting a good specific character, sufficient to dif-

352 | Lord Walden on the lute Colonel Tickell’s

ferentiate cnddusls possessing them specifically from ie
type. For such examples the title of P. elegans (McClell.),
founded on an Assam bird, has been adopted by Mr. Hume
and others. Burman and Assam birds, however, occur with
the middle pair typically coloured (that is, entirely black),
while in Darjeeling birds both varieties are to be met with.
Colonel Tickell figures and:describes an example from Sing-
bhoom, Bengal, with the outer webs of the middle pair of rec-
trices red, as in so-called P. elegans. P. speciosus being a
widely spread and dominant species, exhibits that tendency
to vary usual among species occupying wide areas.

The female of Pericrocotus roseus is correctly, and for the
first time, figured, but inaccurately described as only differ-
ing from P. solaris 9 by having the head no darker than
the back. In P. solaris 2 the ashy upper surface is dark
leaden, as in the male, the under plumage being bright pure
yellow, and not pallid yellow as in P. roseus 9; nor is the
throat greyish white. The back in P. solaris 9 is strongly
coloured with olive-green; in P: roseus 2 the green shade
is much less marked. The bird depicted by Mr. Gould as
P. solaris 2 (B. As. pt.i.), is clearly P. brevirostris @.

P. roseus § 18 figured and described by Colonel Tickell
from a Tenasserim example. The uropygium and upper tail-
coverts are described as being “ pure brilliant searlet.”” This
is certainly the case with all Burman and Assam birds I have
seen. But is it soin typical Bengal and other Indian indi-
viduals ? ‘These last I have never met with varying from the

; description a by Jerdon ia Ind. 1. p. 422)—“rump
tinged with rosy.”

Lanius hypoleucus, Blyth (collurioides, Less.), from Tenas-

e ~ serim, is figured; and so also, among the Dicruride, is Di-
crurus balicassius, apud Tickell (annectens, Hodgs.), and Chibia
hottentata (Criniger splendens, Tickell). Examples of Hemipus
picatus 8 2, from Yé, Tenasserim, are figured; and this
species seems to be the only one found in Burma, unless the
Mergui bird, included by Blyth (Cat. B. Burma, No. 407),
was correctly identified as being H. obscurus.

Among the Flycatchers Darjeeling examples of Butalis

ts po ee SN
x Cage hc =
=. — xe = - ean <2
= er = ere a

———

‘|

Be bs tiny
/ | |
oh! i
at
“ent ve i
| y 4
} it i
f r ¥ "
H Bite il e
P i
J 1
ae }
it i
i uty i
\
it
\ 1h

<—s
he eee

MS. “Illustrations of Indian Ornithology.” = 358

Jerrugineus, adult and young, Muscicapule superciliaris, stro-
phiata, and sapphira, adult and young, and a 'enasserim ex-
ample of Hrythrosterna maculata are well figured ; while the
plate of Humyias melanops, taken from Akyab individuals,
appears to be referable to Cyornis unicolor. The young, in
mottled plumage, and the adult male and female of Cyornis
rubeculoides are represented on’ one plate, and figured from
Tenasserim examples. All three species of Niltava are well
delineated ; and N. macgregorie ¢, in the young plumage, is
introduced.

Volume vi. contains Part 2 of the DentirosrREs, and is con-
fined to the Merulide, which family is made to comprise the
Wrens, Pittas, Thrushes, and some of the Timeliine genera.
It contains thirty plates, with figures of thirty-six species.
Pnoépyga squamata and P. caudata are prettily figured on
one plate; the first species with the throat and breast rufous.
In the letterpress no fresh hght is thrown on the question of
the perplexing changes of colour found in this species. Ri-
mator malacoptilus is depicted running with long strides along
the ground, and Zoothera marginata extracting worms from
a river-bank, as observed by Colonel Tickell in Tenasserim.
Turdus ruficollis (two plates), T. atrigularis, T. rufulus, T.
mollissimus, T. dauma, and T. albicinctus are well figured.

The first plate of the Timeline represents, under the title
of Turdinus macrodactylus, the type of Turdinus crispifrons,
Blyth (J. A.S.B. xxiv. p. 269). It was shot near Moul-
mein. Colonel Tickell considers it to be identical with the
Malaccan form. The young bird is figured with the sides of
the head white. Trichastoma abboti, from near Moulmein, is
figured and described as distinct, with the title of Turdinus
insidiosus, and, on the same plate, a Tenasserian example of
Stachyris nigriceps. |

The next plate represents two little-known species—Turdi-
nus guttatus, Tickell (J. A. 8S. B. 1859, p. 450), and Turdinus
brevicaudatus, Blyth—both discovered by Colonel Tickell on
the Mooleyit range in Tenasserim. Kxamples of 7. guttatus
I have never seen; but, judging by the plate, 1t must be nearly
allied to, perhaps a representative form of, the Malaccan Ji-

354 Lord Walden on the late Colonel Tickell’s

melia leucotis, Strickl. The principal differences between the
two species appear to be :—first, the throat being white in 7’.
guttatus, while it is black in 7. leucotis; and, secondly, the -
breast being ash-coloured in the Malaccan bird, and rufous
(orange-rusty), like the abdomen, in 7. guttatus. Colonel
Tickell’s species was described and figured from a female ; but
he describes the male and female as being alike in plumage ;
yet, although he shot what he presumed to be the male, he
did not succeed in finding it. The form of the bill in the
genus Turdinus is so dissimilar to that of Timelia leucotis
that is difficult to assume that Blyth would refer a species
like Timelia leucotis to his genus Turdinus. Still, in Colonel
Tickell’s plate, the bill resembles that of a Timelia rather than
that of a Turdinus; nor is the plumage that of a Turdinus.
Turdinus brevicauda (so written by Colonel Tickell) is too
highly coloured; and the spots on the tips of the tertiaries
and greater wing-coverts are described and figured as being
white, whereas in all the examples I have seen these spots
are rusty fulvous, and in the excellent figure of the species
given by Mr. Gould (B. As. pt. 24) they are so coloured.
It may be that the Tenasserim type species differs from that
inhabiting the Khasias. As some excuse for describing the
Khasia bird as new under the title of 7. striatus, I may be
permitted to state that I did so at Dr. Jerdon’s request, and
that when he gave me the specimen which I described (Ann.
N. H. (4) vu. p. 241) from, he assured me that it was new.
Lieutenant Wardlaw Ramsay discovered Sibia picaoides
at an elevation of 5000 feet in Karennee (Blyth, B. Burma,
no. 319); and its occurrence in Burma had not been pre-
viously made known; but Colonel Tickell, who figures the
species from a Darjeeling example, mentions that he killed it at
an elevation of 8000 feet in Tenasserim, and that “ it inhabits
the whole Eastern Cis-himalaya and along the Malayan spur.”
His plate represents the colouring of much too pale a tint.
In February 1859, on the plateau of Mooleyit, in Tenas-
serim, at an elevation of 6600 feet, Colonel Tickell discovered
a species of Sibia, which has not, so far as I know, been again
obtained. One example, that of a male, was secured; and on

MS. “Illustrations of Indian Ornithology.” 355

being sent to Blyth at Calcutta, that gentleman (J. A.S. B.
Xxvili. p. 418) described it with the title of Sidia melanoleuca,
Tickell. In the following number of the journal (/.c. no. 5.
p. 491) Colonel Tickell described the bird again, calling it
Stbia picata; and under this title it is described and figured ;
and the plate is one of the most valuable in his work.

The Nightjars, Trogons, Broadbills, Swallows, Swifts, Bee-
eaters, Rollers, Kingfishers, and Hornbills, under the general
title Fissirostres, form the subjects of volume vii., and are
represented on fifty-three plates. The first illustrates a species
of Batrachostomus, obtained near Tongu-ngoo, Burma, and
identified by Colonel Tickell with B. moniliger (Layard).
The figure very accurately represents B. affinis, Blyth, in
bright chestnut plumage, a species which can hardly be sepa-
rated from B. moniliger.

Caprimulgus asiaticus 1s beautifully and most artistically
figured under the title of C. mahrattensis, with which totally
distinct Nightjar Colonel Tickell confounds the commoner
species.

From examples of male and female obtained in Bora-
bhoom, near the northern limits of its range, Harpactes fas-
ciatus is well delineated, and on the succeeding plate the
Javan Trogon, H. orescius, from specimens obtained in Te-
-nasserim.

Tenasserim is the radiating point ot the Hurylemide. All
the generic types, one or other of which extend to the Hima-
layas, to the Indo-Chinese countries, the Malayan peninsula,
and the three great islands of Sumatra, Java, and Borneo,
are to be found in that province and Arracan*. Six of these
species are figured from examples obtained in Tenasserim
by Colonel Tickell, who gives interesting accounts of their
habits.

None of Colonel Tickell’s drawings surpass in beauty those
of the Swallows; and while the delineations of all six species

* E. ochromelas may be an exception; but it is included by Mr. Blyth
(B. Burma, no. 432). The Bornean form of Cymbirhynchus macrorhynchus
can hardly be considered a separate species. The Sumatran Psarisomus

psittacinus may be sufficiently differentiated from P. dalhousie to constitute
a distinct species.

TG A 8 Ye OP TL PALS OTe ENE Pee a AO i (im SRE SEARS be SABES I em
ghee tabi Be BRP PARRY MOY Uy en DONS cored Spd he fe ey see Ne

356 On the late Colonel Tickell’s MS. THustratons”

are particularly graceful, that of Hirundo domicola (javanica,
Sparrm.) may be especially mentioned.

As a record of the fact that Chelidon urbica occurs in Te-
nasserim, an example there obtained, is figured. Cotyle con-
color and C. rupestris are taken out of Boie’s genus and
formed into a separate genus, for which the title of Kywz-
nochelidon is proposed—a generic division already antreipated
by Reichenbach, who entitled it Ptyonoprogne.

The genus Dendrochelidon (Macropteryz) is retained among
the true Swallows (and not, as by most writers, among the
Swifts).

Seven species of Swifts are well represented by as many
drawings. Among these are Acanthylis caudacuta from Dar-
jeelmg, and A. sylvatica, from the type specimen, killed by
Colonel Tickell at Chilpil, Smgbhoom, Nov. 30, 1835. A.
very good plate shows Collocala nidifica (francica, Gm.)
breeding on rocks near Akyab, Arracan, and a male bird in
the act of flying. Colonel Tickell remarks, “TI carefully
compared a specimen I had shot at Darjeeling, August 8,
1848, with a pair brought to me in Akyab, Jan. 9, 1852, and
found them precisely similar in plumage, and in dimensions ~
also, within a minute fraction.’ The dimensions are then
stated; and the differences are trifling. Interesting facts
concerning this species are related in the letterpress. A
good account and plate is given of Cypselus vittatus ( pacificus)
as observed in Tenasserim.

The Bee-eaters and Rollers, which are nearly all figured,
are followed by the Kingfishers—the first plate representing
the Burman Pelargopsis burmanicus, Sharpe, under the name
of Halcyon leucocephalus, Linn., from a Tenasserim example,
and the next the Indian form, with the correct title, H. gu-
rial, Pearson. :

Six species of Bucerotide are depicted, and first B. bicornis
¢, about to feed the female on the nest, immured in the
hole of a tree. A. detailed account of the breeding of this
-bird*,: and outlines showing the progressive growth of the

* This account is published in Colonel Tickell’s paper “on the Horn-
bills of India and Burma” (Ibis, 1864, p, 178).

Ornithological News from New Guinea. B07

casque during the first and second years are given. The type
of Aceros tickelli 2, first discovered by Colonel Tickell, is
figured, with an account of the species, most of which has
been published in ‘The Ibis’ (¢.¢.). A good drawing of Aceros
pusaran ( plicatus), together with original notes on its habits
&c., closes one of the best sections and the last volume of
Colonel Tickell’s beautiful work.

XXXIUI.—Further Ornithological News from New Guinea.
By P. L. Scrarer, M.A., Ph.D., F.R.S.

Since my article on recent ornithological progress in New
Guinea (anted, p. 243) was written, I have received from
Count T. Salvadori a copy of an important paper* on the
collections of Beccari and Bruijn made under the circum-
stances before described, which requires a short additional
notice in order to complete the subject up to the present
period.

The collection of Beccari, made in the short space of six
months, during which large quantities of specimens of other
classes of animals were also procured, contains about 2000
bird-skins, referable to 813 species. It was formed principally
in the Arfak mountains, in the neighbourhood of the now
ornithologically-celebrated Atam, or Hatam, situated at a
height of 6000 feet above the sea-level. Other stations visited
in the same mountains were Warrundi (4000 feet), Mori
(3500), and Profi (3400). Beccari also obtained some very
fine species during his excursions to Gunong Morait and the
river Wa-Samson, which was discovered by him, and reaped
a rich harvest during his exploration of the various islands
and localities in the great Bay of Geelvink, of which I spoke
in my previous article.

Mr. Bruijn’s collection was made by his hunters, princi-

* “Descrizione di cinquant-otto nuove specie di uccelli, ed osservazioni
intorno ad altre poco note della Nuova Guinea e di altre Isole Pa-
puane raccolte. dal Dr. Odoardo Beccari e dai cacciatori del Sig. A. A.

Bruijn. Per Tommaso Salvadori,” Ann. Mus. Ciy. Genova, vii. p. 896
(1875).

Ss eS SE Serra

Sia Sa RES gel =

ee ee =

7 et er

Pecan 2 > SSS
SS ee eae

wee

‘
i
if
ie 4
aa 4
ra, 2
ft)
ane}
4
BP ia
ne yt
Ns
do ed
i
'
i;
nee
ia
Pe
eile
i ti
Peg
Laie
His ee
he
Hoe §
i
> f]
H Gee |
ie
iG
ik
hake
4
By let |
\
;
|
ia
:
i
4
be
i
‘sk
ha cas
Hi
At
vy
i

358 Mr. P. L. Sclater on Ornithological

pally on Mount Arfak and in the islands of the Bay of Geel-
vink, but also contains specimens from Dorey, Sorong, Sala-
watti, Waigiou, and Koffiao. It contains 2644 skins, be-
longing to 279 species, of which 34 only are not represented
in Beccari’s collection.

Thus the two collections together furnish the magnificent.
series of upwards of 4600 specimens, referable to about 350
species, of which no less than 58 are stated to be new to science,
and are described in the present paper. Amongst them are
representatives of five new forms proposed to be called Oreo-
charis, Ramphocharis, Aidistoma, Melilestes, and Timeliopsis.
Oreocharis isa new genus of Diceine ; Ramphocharis is allied
to Melanocharis, and referable to the same group ; Melilestes

‘and Cidistoma are two new forms of Meliphagide. There

are also in the series many new species belonging to Austra-
han genera, such as Grallina bruijni and Drymedus affinis.
Taken together the two collections of Beccari and Bruijn .
contain examples of almost all the species hitherto described
from New Guinea and the Papuan Islands. All the Para-
dise-birds yet known, with the exception of the recently dis-
covered Diphyllodes gulelmi-tertiu and Epimachus ellioti, are
represented in them; and the whole series of Paradisee con-
tains nearly 800 individuals in various stages of plumage.
Salvadori, in the present paper, separates the Pygmy Parrots
of the islands of Geelvink Bay, which have been described by
Schlegel as local varieties, as Nasiterna maforensis and N.
misorensis, and gives a description of the female of his recently
discovered N. bruijnt of the Arfak Mountains. Salvadori
has compared Leucophantes brachyurus, Scl., with specimens
of the genus Amaurodryas (i.e. Petroica), and does not agree
with Meyer’s notion that they are congeneric. I may add
that I am quite of Salvadori’s opinion. My Leucophantes is
by no means the same as Petroica. Salvadori describes two
new species of this genus as L. hypoxanthus and L. leucops
from Mount Arfak. The Manucodia of Jobi is separated
from M. chalybeia as M. jobiensis, upon somewhat slender
grounds it appears to me, only one specimen from Jobi being
in the collection. Count Salvadori will, I trust, forgive me if I

News from New Guinea. 359

say, with due respect, that he seems to place rather too much
stress upon the differences existing between local forms of the
same species, as exhibited in these specimens from the different
islands of the Bay of Geelvink. That these islands do con-
tain many very well-marked representative forms (such as
Goura victorie and Tanysiptera caroline) is certain ; but it by
no means follows that there are no species in them identical
with those-of the mainland of New Guinea.

Of D’Albertis and his doings, since I last wrote, I have had
many accounts from my excellent friend and correspondent
Dr. George Bennett, of Sydney. D’Albertis, after accom-
panying the expedition of Messrs. MacFarlane and Chester up
the Fly River in the ‘ Ellengowan’ m December last, returned
to Sydney. to recruit his health. Of his voyage up the Fly
River, which was ascended for 150 miles*, he has given a very
interesting account in an article published in the ‘ Sydney
Morning Herald, from which I extract the following para-
graphs. Speaking of the country in the neighbourhood of
the highest point reached, he says :—

“ Here the wild nutmeg and the gigantic figtrees are seen
in fruit and luxuriance of foliage, attracting the fruit-eating
Pigeons (Carpophaga), the Red Bird of Paradise (Paradisea
raggiana), Hornbills (Buceros ruficollis), and other species of
frugivorous birds in great numbers. At another part are the
Candle-nut tree (Aleurites) and several species of Canary-
nut trees (Canarium, on the fruit of which the great Palm
Cockatoos (Microglossus aterrimus) feed.”

“‘ Where the jungle is not so dense a small bamboo grows,
and is a place of resort for the Megapodius and Talegalla,
being suitable for their food and the construction of their
nests. Where the forest is more dense it is difficult to pene-
trate, from the entanglement of the vines and the strong-
growing climbing palm (Calamus australis ?), which throws
up shoots of great length, covered with sharp spines, and long
tendrils, similarly armed, ascending to the tops of the tallest
trees. At this place we observe the Racket-tailed King-
fisher (Tanysiptera dea), frequently seen darting with a heavy

* See Proc. R. Geogr. Soc. March 18th, 1876.

a ee

SS SS EES — Ee

a 5 See
{SES
a

ia)
3
i}?
it
1
wt
i
G\
:

arta gare ar
om areas

—— <5

360 Mr. P. L. Sclater on Ornithological

dash upon a beetle or some other insect, while the beautiful
King Bird-of-Paradise (Cicinnurus regius) may be seen climb-
ing on the vines, displaying the bright tints of its splendid, rich,
and varied colours to the bright rays of a tropical sun as it
occasionally penetrates the dense foliage of the trees.”

“A splendid and rare Kingfisher (Halcyon nigrocyanea)
and another Kingfisher (Ceyx solitaria) are heard uttering
their piercing notes by a rivulet in some secluded nook.

“Where the trees are more lofty but not so overgrown
by vines, the large and noble Crowned Pigeon (Goura), of
the size of a Turkey, is often seen walking majestically about,
seeking for the fruits and seeds upon which it subsists ; and
on the top of the loftiest trees the magnificent Red Bird of
Paradise (Paradisea raggiana) is seen displaying under the
bright sunshine its rich and beautiful plumage, and endea-
vouring to excite the attention of the unadorned female from
its elevation, out of the reach of the arrows of the natives and
of the gun of the naturalist. But the king of the forest here is
the Cassowary, the footprints of which are to be seen in every
muddy place, mingled with the hoof-marks of the wild boar.
The night at this place is disturbed by a variety of strange
noises, and probably still stranger animals; whilst at the
early hours of the morning we are awakened by the piercing
cries of numbers of Lories and Honey-eating Parrots (Tri-
choglossus) passing over our Page the latter nace along
with the rapidity of an arrow.’

“The loud whoch-whock emanates from the unmusical and
far from celestial voice of the Birds of Paradise; and the pe-
culiar, prolonged, loud and shrill, but mournful whistle of
the great Palm Cockatoo (Microglossus aterrimus) and the
drum-like noise of the Cassowary are heard. The scenery, if
not very bold, is interesting for its novelty; and it is almost
impossible to resist a kind of fascination for the wildness and
novelty of our situation.”

“Tt is difficult to express the feeling of the explorer on
anchoring in a new place up a river a little before sunset, and
when every object appears before him wonderful, novel, and
interesting, and which, on the approach of darkness, assumes

News from New Guinea. 361

a fantastic appearance, especially when millions of fireflies
are seen flitting about in all directions; their lights reflected
in clear smooth water increase the luminosity to nearly
double. I may mention here that when at anchor at Kiwai
Island, early in the morning and a little before sunset, thon-
sands of the black-and-white Fruit-Pigeon (Carpophaga spi-
lorrhoa) were seen, as at Yule Island, going from the east to
the west to their roosting-place, and in the morning would be
seen returning from the west to the east ; so that I consider this
species of Pigeon to be almost as plentiful in this part of the
world as the American Passenger Pigeon (Kctopistes migra-
torius) is in North America.”

“From our anchorage at Attack Island, on the 20th
December, we saw large flocks of the Ibis strictipennis, or
Straw-throated Ibis, flying at a great elevation in a north-
west directiou.”

“ My curiosity was very much excited on hearing of Mr.
Stone’s supposed discovery of a ‘very large bird,’ and of foot-
prints of ‘ buffaloes’ on the Baxter River, and on reading in
‘Nature’ of the discovery of the dung of a ‘rhinoceros’ in
New Guinea by Captain Moresby. I do not allude to the
imaginative fauna of a Captain Lawson, because the disco-
veries of Captain Moresby and Mr. Stone are amply sufficient
to excite the most sanguine hopes of any naturalist. But, alas !
I was doomed to disappointment ; for I found the fauna of the
Fly River very poor, considering the character of the country
and the vegetation. I could not get a glimpse of the gigantic
bird, with a spread of wings of 22 feet (very considerately
reduced by Mr. Stone to 16 feet); nor was I fortunate enough
to see the dung of Captain Moresby’s rhinoceros, nor the
beast itself, nor even the footprints of the buffaloes. I think
I did, however, see the bird mentioned by Mr. Stone; and IJ
have also seen common heaps of dung so large as to make
me wonder when I first saw them. With respect to the large
bird, from what I have heard from more than one person who
was up the Baxter River, I can safely reduce it to the moderate
size-of the Red-necked Hornbill (Buceros ruficollis) ; pro-
bably, in the excitement for novelties, two or three birds

SER. I1I.—VOL. VI. 2B

SSS SS

~ ene
= =~ a
—- —————

ete Se woe

362. Mr. P. L. Selater on Ornithological

starting in flight at once may have been magnified into one.
The flight of the Hornbill is very peculiar, being slow and
steady, with the noise of a locomotive engine. The noise
made by the bird in its flight was at first recognized by some
on board as that of the huge bird seen on the Baxter River ;
and then the colour of the bird decided the question : so,
although the spread of this monster’s wings has already been
reduced to 16 feet, I am obliged to reduce it still further, to
about 4 or 5 feet.

“ With respect to the dung seen by Captain Moresby, I may
remark that a stranger observing for the first time the dung of
the Cassowary, and not having the experience which he would
have when resident for some time in the country, would never
suppose it was produced by a bird; in one of such heaps I
have counted upwards of forty-three almost undigested seeds
of the fruit of a Pandanus. It is certainly a matter of sur-
prise to see the size of the heap of dung deposited by that
bird in a wild state.

“T think it will be interesting to mention that in this part
of New Guinea (nearer to Cape York than Hall Sound), I
observed that the flora and fauna are more decidedly Pa-
puan than at Hall Sound, although the latitude is almost the
same,

“A number of the species of birds which I procured are
denizens of New Guinea only; and here I did not see a single
Eucalyptus ; whilst at Hall Sound I have found species of
birds common to both Northern Australia and New Guinea,
and at least two species of Hucalyptus very common, as well
as many of the North-Australian plants. This, judging from
the flora and fauna of the Fly River, evidently shows that
this part of the country is more allied to the north-west part
of New Guinea than to the eastern portion.”

I am glad to be able to add that D’Albertis’s excursion
up the Fly River has attracted a good deal of attention in
Sydney, and that the Government of New South Wales have
provided him with a steam-launch for the further prosecution
of his discoveries. Moreover a public subscription is likely
to be raised to provide for the expenses of further explora-
tion in this direction.

News from New Guinea. 363

Accounts of D’Albertis’s excursion to Nou, Bioto, and
Naiabui (small villages on the mainland opposite Yule Island)
in the summer of 1875 are given in a recently published
number of ‘Cosmos’*; but little reference is made to birds
in them.

While D’Albertis has fixed his headquarters at Yule Island,
a party from Sydney has established itself at Port Moresby, a
little to the south, and is making successful excursions into
theinteriort. As this expedition, which is under the conduct
of Mr. O. C. Stone, numbers amongst its members Messrs.
Broadbent and Pettard, the well-known collectors and taxi-
dermists of Sydney, there can be little doubt that ornithology
will be by no means neglected by them, and that we shall
before long have to record some of their discoveries in this
branch.

Since I wrote my last article Dr. A. B. Meyer has sent
me a separate copy of a paper from the “ Sitzungsberichte ”
of the ‘Isis’ at Dresden. It contains descriptions of Phle-
genas jobiensis, Micreca papuana, Budytes nove-guinee,
and Parus arfaki (already characterized in his article in the
first number of the ‘ Mittheilungen aus dem k. zoologischen
Museum zu Dresden,’ see above, p. 256), and a summary of
our knowledge of the Papuan Psittacide.

Mr. Gould is preparing for issue a third part of his ‘ Birds
of New Guinea, which will contain illustrations of the follow-
ing species, many of them of rare beauty and of excessive
interest :-—

Part III. May 1876.

Tanysiptera caroline. Diphyllodes respublica.
Ceyx solitaria. Cicinnurus regius.
Charmosyna josephine. _ Pachycare tlavo-grisea.
Charmosyna pulchella. Eupetes czerulescens.
Psitteuteles arfaki. Sternula placens.
Psitteuteles wilhelminz. Gliciphila subfasciata,

Psitteuteles placens.

* “Recenti Spedizioni alla Nuova Guinea,” Cosmos, vol. iii. p. 217
{April 1876).
+ See Proc. R. Geogr. Soc, March 13th, 1876.
2B2

1 1
i
| ‘
t
k
| a
t pa
t a4
aS
ai Ba
| a
{
| 2
iW
i ; y
i b
i
j 1
it a
a ,
YF
y hy)
i
i ) Gey
i wt
u)
"i apy
Pe I
} By ae It
y '
i } ih
‘ie He
} u "
iy I
| e
it ' af) if M
i j
at (
| Bi | f
} | H
t q i.
: ‘
i} int
ni F
it

oes Rare Se re

364 Mr. J. H. Gurney’s Notes on

Finally, I may mention that Dr. Comrie, late surgeon of
H.M:S. ‘ Basilisk,’ under the command of Capt. Moresby, has
placed in my hands for determination a small collection of
bird-skins, made during the survey of the N.E. coast of New
Guinea, of which Capt. Moresby has lately given us such an
interesting narrative*. Amongst these are a single skin of
a fine new Manucodia, which I described at a recent Meet-
ing of the Zoological Society as M. comrit, and several ex-
amples of that rare Lory Lorius hypenochrous of G. R. Gray
—both fine additions to the Papuan avifauna.

May 18, 1876.

XXXIV.—WNotes on a ‘Catalogue of the Accipitres in the
British Museum, by R. Bowdler Sharpe (1874). By J. H.
GURNEY.

[Continued from p. 243. }

Ir will be convenient in considering the Old- World species
of the genus Buteo to commence with B. vulgaris; and in
doing so I would remark that Mr. Sharpe only alludes in
somewhat general terms to the geographical range of this
species, but that a detailed account of the localities where it
has been ascertained to exist will be found in Mr. Dresser’s
recent article on this species in his ‘ Birds of Europe ;’ and to
this account I have only to add, with reference to its western
range, that the Norwich Museum contains an adult pairy,
with their nestling young, obtained in the island of Madeira,
and, with reference to its eastern, that the same collection
possesses specimens from Trebizond and Erzeroom.

It is well known that this species is very subject to partial
leucotism ; but how far this is limited to young birds does not
appear to have been accurately ascertained ; I have, however,
observed that such examples usually have a straw-coloured

* See above, p. 259.

+ These specimens have been recently examined by Mr. Dresser, who
agrees with me in referring them to B. vulgaris, of which they are, in
fact, typical examples,

Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres. 365

iris instead of the dark hazel iris which is characteristic of
normal specimens.

Apart from these accidental variations of plumage, the
passage from the immature to the adult dress is not marked
im this species by any very conspicuous change; the dark.
markings on the under surface, however, are decidedly more
or less longitudinal in immature specimens, whilst they are
always transverse in those which are fully adult, except on
the throat, where they are permanently longitudinal.

Mr. Sharpe speaks of a young bird as having the inter-.
spaces on the upper surface of the tail “strongly shaded with.
rufous.” I have also seen a rufous tinge on the rectrices of
an immature specimen ; but it is by no means a characteristic
of immature age, as it is most frequently absent at that
period, and on the other hand, I never saw it so strongly
marked as in a specimen which was known to have lived in
confinement for twenty years.

At page 182 of his work, Mr. Sharpe also remarks that
British specimens of this Buzzard “ are certainly darker than
continental birds.” This statement does not altogether tally
with my experience; and it is my belief that no geographical
variation of tint would be found to prevail in a sufficient
series of normal specimens of British and foreign origin,
though I think it probable that partial leucotism will be-
found more rife among the individuals of this species in some-
countries than in others, and though it certainly is not very:
prevalent amongst British specimens, which are, for the most
part, normal in their markings and coloration.

Tt is remarkable that the island of Madagascar should. pos-
sess a distinct Buzzard (B.. brachypterus), which, but for its
proportionally shorter wing, might almost be said to be a
miniature of B. vulgaris ; but as this curious species does not
appear to require any further comment on the present occa-

* The ‘Zoologist’ for the present year contains at page 4829 an inter-
esting note by Mr. Cordeaux on the contents of a nest of Buteo vulgaris,
taken in North Wales in June 1872. He says, ‘ there were two young
partly fledged birds in the nest; and beside them lay two moles, two

stoats, and a pine-marten,”

366 Mr. J. H. Gurney’s Noles on

sion, I pass on to the consideration of Buteo desertorum,
respecting which, however, I have but little to add to my
remarks in ‘ The Ibis’ for 1862, p. 361.

In the case of this species, as in that of B. vulgaris, a very
full article has lately appeared from the pen of Mr. Dresser
in the ‘ Birds of Europe,’ in which he gives more ample de-
tails as to the measurements, variations of plumage, and geo-
graphical range of this Buzzard than can be looked for im
the briefer summary comprised in Mr. Sharpe’s work. In
this article Mr. Dresser mentions the fact of his having re-
ceived a specimen of B. desertorum from the remarkably
northern locality of Archangel; and since its publication he
has seen a second example, which was also obtained in that
vicinity. :

In Mr. Dresser’s article on B. vulgaris he remarks that
subsequently to the publication of his account of B. deser-
torum he had examined the Buzzards obtained by Mr. God-~
man in the Azores, and had “ ascertained that they were not,
as was supposed, B. vulgaris, but B. desertorum”’*.

Mr. Gould, in the introduction to his magnificent work on
the birds of Great Britain, refers to a Buzzard of this species
which was killed at Everley, Wiltshire, in September 1864.
This specimen Mr. Gould kindly permitted me to examine,
when it was in his custody, some years since; and there ap-
peared to me to be no doubt of its being really B. desertorum
in immature plumage.

I may add that Mr. Gould, in his remarks upon this species,
says, “it 1s included by Schlegel in his ‘ Fauna Japonica,’ ”
which conveys the idea that it had been received from Japan ;
but this is a misapprehension: the authors of the ‘ Fauna
Japonica’ give, at page 16 of their volume “ Aves,” a list of
Buzzards which they consider to be nearly allied to Buteo
japonicus; and it is merely in this list and as one of these
species that they mention “la buse commune du Cap...
espéce que nous désignerons sous le nom de Buteo capensis.”

Mr. Sharpe states that B. desertorum “gradually gets
darker with age ;” but having had the opportunity of watch-

* Conf. Ibis, 1866, p. 94,

Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres. 367

ing its changes of plumage in confinement, I do not think
that they bear out this assertion.

The change which takes place in the passage from the
immature to the fully adult dress is chiefly characterized by
the bird becoming, throughout, less fuliginous and more
intensely rufous; but this can only be correctly estimated by
@ comparison of individuals which have newly moulted ; for I
know no Buzzard in which the plumage becomes so worn and
faded between the period of the assumption and moult of its
feathers as in this species, and especially in North-African
individuals, so that it seems difficult to recognize the ragged
and faded bird which is approaching its moult as identical
with the wearer of the rich rufous dress which distinguishes
the adult of this species when the process of moulting has
been but just completed.

It may be useful to note in conclusion that full details of
the coloration &c. of Himalayan examples of this Buzzard
are given by Mr. Hume in his ‘ Rough Notes,’ pp. 271-274.

Buteo ferox, the next species which we have to consider, is
closely allied to B. desertorum, but of larger dimensions and
a less extended geographical range.

This Buzzard, like B. desertorum, though not quite to the
same extent, is liable to a great loss of colour from the fading
and attrition of the plumage between the period of its moults ;
and this circumstance must be borne in mind in studying the
variations to which this species is hable.

Buteo ferox, like B. desertorum and B. vulgaris, has been
recently the subject of a very full and exhaustive article by
Mr. Dresser in the ‘ Birds of Europe, to which I would refer
my readers.

Mr. Dresser’s views of the changes of plumage incident to
this species differ from those propounded by Mr. Sharpe; and
the observations which I have made on numerous specimens
lead me to agree in this instance with the opinions of Mr.
Dresser rather than with those which have been published by
Mr. Sharpe.

It seems to me to be certain that, in this species, the trans-
verse bars upon the tail are ordinarily and normally an indi-

368 Mr. J. H. Gurney’s Notes on

cation of immaturity; and as all the melanistic speemens

which -I have seen, as well as those described by Mr. Hume
- (vide ‘Rough Notes,’ p. 282), are thus barred, I cannot but
believe that they are immature birds, and not very old indi-
viduals, as supposed by Mr. Sharpe.

At the same time it is quite certain that this melanistic
phase is not the ordinary immature plumage (vide Mr. Dres-
ser’s description of a nestling from Smyrna) ; and I there-
fore look upon it as an accidental and abnormal variation
which, so far as I know, has hitherto only been met with m
Northern, and especially in North-western India, and once
also in Abyssinia®.

Mr. W. E. Brooks, to whose correspondence I have been
indebted for much information upon Indian birds of prey,
writes to me respecting this dark-coloured form as follows :—
“Tt is a common bird in the Northern Punjaub, where it is
commoner than the red bird ; since it never leaves its north-
ern quarters, like the other, I believe it to be distinct from
B. ferox.”

Mr. Hume, on the contrary, though he in the first instance
described the fuliginous form as being probably specifically
distinct (vide Ibis, 1869, p. 356), has subsequently inclined
to the opinion that it is identical with B. ferow, and that the
fuliginous plumage is assumed (as stated by Mr. Sharpe) by
old rather than by immature individuals (vide ‘ Rough Notes,’
p. 278, and ‘ Stray Feathers,’ 1873, p. 159).

It would appear, from Mr. Hume’s article in the ‘ Rough
Notes,’ that he does not take the same view as Mr. Brooks
of the relative abundance of the two forms in the Punj-
aub; but this may, perhaps, arise from Mr. Hume’s ob-
servations having reference to a more southerly district of
the Punjaub than those of Mr. Brooks, and we may look
with confidence to the zeal and perseverence of our ornitho-
logical fellow-labourers in Northern India as a means of
clearing up, by further observations, whatever still remains
doubtful and obscure in our knowledge of this fine Buzzard.

* Since the above was in print I have observed that the dark phase of

Bineo ferox has been recorded by Severtzoff (under the title of B. negricans)
as occurring and breeding in Turkestan: wide ‘The Ibis,’ 1875, p. 103.

Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres. 369

'To proceed to the consideration of another allied species,
I may observe that Mr. Sharpe identifies Buteo japonicus of
Temminck and Schlegel with B. plumipes of Hodgson. I do
not feel altogether certain that this identification is correct*;
and even if it be so, I cannot agree with Mr. Sharpe’s view
that this dark form is the “very old” stage of plumage in
this species. To me it seems much more hkely to be an ac-
cidental melanism, both from its great rarity, and from the
fact of its never having been observed either in China or
Japan, but only in countries adjacent to the Himalayah
Mountains—a circumstance which possibly may afford a par-
allel to the occurrence, in a similarly restricted but more
westerly district, of the melanistic phase of B. ferox.

Buteo japonicus, in its normal adult plumage, bears a very
remarkable resemblance in the coloration of the upper portion
of the breast to the adult male of B. swainsoni of North
America; but in the case of B. japonicus this peculiarity is,
I believe, common to both sexes.

Some valuable remarks on the partial feathering of the
tarsus in this species will be found at pages 17 and 18 of the
‘Fauna Japonica, which also treats at page 19 of the still
greater development of this peculiarity in another oriental
Buzzard, B. hemilasius, a species respecting which the learned
authors of this work remark, with great truth, “ qu’elle tient
précisément le milieu entre les buses pattues et les buses
ordinaires.”

As specimens of Buteo hemilasius are very scarce in col-
lections, it may be desirable to record the following measure-
ments of a female from Shanghai, which is preserved in the
Norwich Museum :—culmen from front of cere 1°35 inch,
wing from carpal joint 18°9, tarsus 3:2, middle toe s. u. 1°8.

This specimen agrees generally in coloration with the
female described by Mr. Sharpe, but has much fewer trans-
verse bars on the tail: the central pair of rectrices have but
four such bars, above which are three irregular marks that
do not appear on the other rectrices; and some of these also
differ from the central pair in having only three transverse

* See Dr. Jerdon’s remarks in ‘The Ibis’ for 1871, p. 340, and Mz,
Blanford’s in ‘The Ibis’ for 1872, p. 87.

370 Mr. J. H. Gurney’s Notes on

bars; the terminal portion of the tail in this specimen is
slightly tinged with rufous.

From Buteo hemilasius it appears to be a natural transition
to pass to the consideration of the Rough-legged Buzzards,
forming the genus Archibuteo ; subsequently to which I pro-
pose to recur to the remaining Buteonine groups with unfea-
thered tarsi, to which I have not as yet alluded.

In treating of the genus Archibuteo, it may be convenient,
in the first instance, to refer to Archibuteo strophiatus of
Hodgson, a species of at least equal rarity with Buteo hemi-
lasius, and of somewhat similar geographical range, as it ex-
tends from Northern India to China, where it has been ob-
tained as far north as Shanghai; it has not, however, so far
as I know, been observed in Japan.

The earliest synonyms for this species are, according to
Mr. Sharpe’s work, the following :—

Hemiaétos strophiatus, Hodgson, in Gray’s Zool. Misc. p. 81
(1844).

Archibuteo strophiatus, Gray, Cat. of Hodgson’s Coll. of
Mammals and Birds of Nepal, p. 39 (1846).

Archibuteo hemiptilopus, Blyth, J. A. 8S. B. vol. xv. p. 1
(1846).

Archibuteo cryptogenys, Hodgson, Calcutta Journ. N. H.
p. 94, pl. 3.* fig. 1 (1847).

In considering the question whether these synonyms are
all properly referable to the same species, it may be well to
mention that the British Museum. possesses what appears to
be the undoubted type specimen of Hodgson’s “ strophiatus,’
as that specific namet is inscribed on a coloured drawing pre-
sented by Mr. Hodgson to the Museum, which so accurately
represents the stuffed specimen in the national collection,
that I think there can be no doubt of its being a portrait of
that individual. ‘This specimen is also figured in Mr. Sharpe’s
work, pl. 7. fig. 2.

* This plate is erroneously referred to as pl. 5 in Mr. Sharpe’s book,
probably from a misprint.

+ Iam indebted to Mr. Sharpe for the following copy of the inscription
on this drawing :—“ Aquila? strophiata. Type of the subgenus Hemiaetus,
mihi.”

Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres. 371

The late Dr. Jerdon, writing at page 340 of ‘The Ibis’
for 1871 respecting Hodgson’s A. strophiatus, remarks that
“it 1s certainly the same as Blyth’s A. hemiptilopus.....
His specimen in the British Museum .... perfectly resembles
the type of Blyth’s hemiptilopus,’’

I have no doubt that this view is correct, although it would
appear from Mr. Blyth’s description of the type of A. hemi-
ptilopus that it wants the “ broad irregular band of white across
the breast” (to quote the words of Mr. Sharpe) which is
conspicuous in the type of A. strophiatus.

This, however, seems to be but a variable character, as a
male from Shanghai in the Norwich Museum has much more
white ou the underparts than the type specimen, agreeing in
this respect with a presumed female from Kooloo, described
by Mr. Hume in ‘Stray Feathers’ for 1873, p. 315.

Mr. Hume also mentions that in his specimen “ the first
three quills have the whole of both webs above the emargi-
nation pure white ;” but this is probably an individual pecu-
_ larity, as in the Shanghai specimen at Norwich the outer
webs above the emargination of these quills are dark grey,
and in the British-Museum specimen the primaries are de-
scribed by Mr. Sharpe as “ having a slight greyish shade ex-
ternally ;” Mr. Blyth also describes the type of A. hemipti-
lopus as having the “ primaries dusky, paler above the emar-
gination of the outer web.”

Unfortunately Mr. Hodgson’s specific name of “ strophi-
atus”’ is unaccompanied by any description, either in Dr.
Gray’s ‘Zoological Miscellany” (1844, p. 81) or in his:
Nepal Catalogue (1846, p. 39); and I therefore apprehend
that, unless such a description was published elsewhere prior
to the publication of Mr. Blyth’s specific name of hemipii-
lopus (which, so far as I can ascertain, is not the case), it
will be right to drop the specific name of “ strophiatus”’ and
to adopt that of “ hemiptilopus,” assuming that the iden-
tity of these two birds is (as I think it is) sufficiently esta-
blished.

There is, however, another question which arises with re-
ference to the synonymy of this Buzzard, viz. :—Is Archi-

372 ‘ Mr. J. H. Gurney’s Notes on

buteo cryptogenys of Flodgson really identical with his 4. stro-
phiatus, and consequently with Blyth’s A. hemiptilopus ?

Mr. Hodgson appears to have been very decided in his
opinion that A. cryptogenys is a good and distinct species, as
may be seen by a reference to the paper in which he described
and figured it in the 8th volume of the ‘ Caleutta Journal of
Natural History ;? but unfortunately the type specimen of A.
cryptogenys does not (so far as I know) now exist, and in its
absence it is not easy to decide with certainty whether it
really was or was not distinct from 4. strophiatus, or, to
use the more correct name, from A. hemiptilopus.

I am indebted to Mr. W. E. Brooks, who has paid con-
siderable attention to this question, for his expression of his
opinion that Mr. Hodgson’s view of the distinctness of A.
cryptogenys.was correct ; but, on the other hand, Mr. Hume,
in the article in ‘Stray Feathers’ for 1873, to which I have
already alluded, treats A. cryptogenys as identical with A.
hemiptilopus (though apparently not admitting the identity
of the latter with A. strophiatus) ; and I may add that the late
Dr. Jerdon also greatly doubted the distinctness of A. cryp-
togenys, as may be seen by his remarks in ‘The Ibis’ for
1871, p. 340.

Without attempting to decide this doubtful question, I may
nevertheless offer an observation on one point connected with
it, viz. that the circumstance of the nares being nearly hidden
by thickset soft plumuli in A. cryptogenys (as mentioned by
Mr. Hodgson in his description of this Buzzard) is certainly
not a specific peculiarity, masmuch as the nostrils are simi-
larly covered in the type specimen of A. strophiatus, as they
also are in the example from Shanghai in the Norwich
Museum.

In conclusion, it may, perhaps, be worth while to add the
principal dimensions of the last-named specimen, which was
marked by the collector as a male: these are—wing from
carpal joint 17:8 inches, tarsus 3:1, middle toe s. u. 1-6; the
culmen is imperfect.

Proceeding to the consideration of the Rui legged Buz-
zard of Hurope (A. lagopus), 1 may remark that Mr. Sharpe’s

Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres. 373

list of the specimens of that Buzzard in the British Museum
includes two immature examples obtained in Natal by the
late Sir A. Smith, which afford evidence of the extensive and
irregular wanderings of the young birds of this species, and
perhaps also make it probable that Le Vaillant. was accurate
in stating that he had obtained this Buzzard during his travels
in South Africa, although it is, on the other hand, quite pos-
sible that the bird he obtained there was Nisaétus pennatus,
and that afterwards, writing from memory, he confused the
Booted Eagle with the Rough-legged Buzzard.

Be this as it may, the specimens obtained by Sir A. Smith
(presuming that no error has occurred respecting their lo-
cality) form an exception to the statement in Mr. Dresser’s
article on this species, in his ‘ Birds of Europe,’ that “it has
never been met with south of the Mediterranean.” I may
add that in the Catalogue of the birds in the British Museum,
published in 1848, only one of these Natal specimens is men-
tioned, which probably arose from the other specimen not
having been mounted.

The Norwich Museum contains two newly fledged nestlings
of this species, which are remarkable for the conspicuous
rufous margins of their feathers. In one of these this pecu-
liarity strongly pervades both the upper and under portions
of the plumage; in the other it is less conspicuous, and is
limited to the upper parts only. Such rufous margins, in great
measure, disappear from the plumage of the young bird in
the course of the first autumn, but are frequently more or
less reassumed at subsequent moults.

The change from the immature to the fully adult dress is
probably not completed till the third year ; and the specimen
described by Mr. Sharpe as an ‘‘adult female”. does not
appear to me to have attained its full adult plumage, which is
well described at page 119 of vol. 1. of Professor Newton’s
edition of Yarrell’s ‘ British Birds,’ and also in Mr. Dresser’s
article to which I have already referred: this adult stage is
especially characterized by the dark transverse bands on a
white ground which appear to be always more or less con-
spicuous on the upper surface of the tail in fully adult

= — =
. Serena = = ] =; 3

Cee Ee ees

Sane e. = ae

eee

.
i
i
1a
ial
A
‘n
|

_ ee a a tx
= Se an ae eprom cS Sasa ———_ A
~ — a i. ~ - | aa = ‘ a io Ses
SS ea SSS ere re
SS x mat Sa a ae ee

£1 Ga EN Eas
ie
a

qin ae

= tg a NS ne PST
tye =e - re

“ ~~ Se

inne
So amt

Se = -
a a

374 Mr. J. H. Gurney’s Notes on

birds. In such specimens these bands are from three to four
in number, in addition to the dark subterminal band, which
is also found in younger individuals, and is much broader
in young birds than in those which are adult.

In those specimens which are in a state of change from
the immature to the fully adult dress, this broad and dark
subterminal band is itself crossed by one or more compara-
tively narrow bands of a paler brown, which ultimately be-
come white as the bird assumes its completely adult dress.

The iris in this species appears to be brown in some spe-
cimens and yellow in others, and to exhibit various shades
of these colours in different individuals.

Melanistic varieties of this Buzzard are extremely rare,
which is the more remarkable as they are of very frequent

~ occurrence in the case of its closely allied North-American

representative, A. sancti-johannis.

Such a melanistic specimen is mentioned by Professor
Newton at page 122 of the ‘Ootheca Wolleyana;’ and I have
recently seen a remarkably fine melanism of this species,
which was one of the many examples of the Rough-legged
Buzzard obtained in Great Britain during the autumn and
winter of 1875.

This specimen, which was trapped in the neighbourhood of
Barnstaple in December last, has been added to the collec-
tion of the Rev. Murray A. Matthew, of Bishop’s Lydeard,
in Somersetshire, to whose courtesy I have been indebted for
an opportunity of examining it, so far as the case in which
it is now glazed up would permit of my doing so. It is a very
fine specimen, and unusually large in its dimensions for a
male bird, which it is asserted to have been by the bird-
stuffer who dissected and mounted it; Mr. Matthew, who
measured it before it was cased up, informed me that he found
the length of the wing from the carpal jomt 17:5 inches, and
that of the tarsus 3-5. The bird had, apparently, just com-
pleted its moult, and is in beautiful condition, the plumage
being throughout (with very slight exceptions, hereafter to
be noticed) of a very dark brown, strongly tinged with pur-
plish reflections, especially on the interscapulary feathers ;

Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres. 375

the scapulars are slightly paler than the rest of the plumage,
and show dark shaft-marks, which are not visible elsewhere ;
the lesser and middle wing-coverts, on the side which I was
able to examine, each showed a solitary feather of the pre-
vious year still unmoulted, and decidedly paler than the sur-
rounding plumage; the second, third, and fourth primaries also
appear not to have been moulted, and are tinged with grey, the
others being almost black ; the lower portion of the abdomen
and the tibize are also nearly black, being perceptibly darker
than the general colour of the body; the under tail-coverts
have a few white spots on them, wedge-shaped, with the nar-
row end of the wedge pointing downwards ; these spots, and
a slight tinge of white on the lores and on the extreme front
of the forehead, are the only white portions of the plumage
which I was able to detect ; on the upper surface of the tail
three irregular transverse grey bars are visible, which are
especially apparent on the four central rectrices, the remainder
of the tail being a dark brown; these bars are rather more
than half an inch in breadth, and about twice as broad as the
brown interspaces between them*; the under surface of the
tail is greyish white, slightly mottled with a darker tint, and
crossed by an irregular subterminal band of dark greyish
brown.

Archibuteo sancti-johannis, which is the representative of
A. lagopus in the North-American continent, approaches so
closely to the European race, that I can only consider it a
subspecies of A. lagopus.

Comparing non-melanistic specimens of A. sancti-johannis
with normal examples of A. lagopus, I find them on the
average slightly darker, and decidedly more rufous, the ex-
cess of rufous colouring in the American race being especially
apparent on the tibial feathers ; no appreciable difference in
size or measurements exists between the two species.

Mr. Sharpe gives full descriptions of the different phases
of plumage incident to A. sancti-johannis ; and more detailed

* I may remark that in the melanisms of A. sanctijohannis which I

have examined this proportion is reversed, the brown bars on the tail in
these specimens being broad and the grey narrow.

SS SS 2 SS SS ae ae a. ae ia + er AE oe ie t.
Peta oe te re ee ‘ rie TS ae Ses td

376 Lord Walden on a new Species of Trichostoma.

particulars will be found in the article on this species (there
styled Archibuteo lagopus, var. sancti-johannis) in the third
volume of the ‘ History of North-American Birds,’ by Messrs.
Baird, Brewer, and Ridgway. .

The iris in this species appears to be liable to variations of
colour similar to those which occur in the case of A. lagopus.

There remains but one other species of the genus Archi-
buteo, the beautiful A. ferrugineus of Western North America—
a species which, as it seems to me, is most obviously and un-
questionably distinct, but which, nevertheless, has been unac-
countably held by so high an authority as Professor Schlegel
to be merely “quelque sort de leucoisme, ou, si l’on veut,
d’érythrisme” of A. lagopus*.

This fine and well-marked species has been fully described
by Mr. Sharpe, and also in the exhaustive work of Messrs.
Baird, Brewer, and Ridgway. The latter authors give a
table of measurements taken from six males and six females
of this species, none of which, however, appear to equal the
principal dimensions of the adult described by Mr. Sharpe.

The colour of the iris in this Buzzard seems to be as vari-
able as in A. lagopus and A. saneti-johannis: Mr. Sharpe
describes it as “ brown” in the adult; whilst the authors of
the American work above referred to mention an adult male
in which it was a “clear light yellow,” and an adult female
in which it was a “ light ochraceous brown.”

[To be continued. ]

XXXV.—Description of a new Species of the Genus Tri-
chostoma from the Island of Celebes. By Artuur, Vis-
count WALDEN. |

(Plate XI.)

In Jardine’s ‘ Contributions to Ornithology’ (1849, pp. 127,.
128, t.) the late Mr. Strickland gave a short account,
accompanied by a figure, of a Celebean bird on which he
bestowed the title of Trichastoma celebense. On the prece-

* Vide Mus. des Pays-Bas, Revue de la collection des Oiseaux de Proie,
“p. 105.

Lord Walden on a new Species of Trichostoma. 377

ding page he had already shortly described a Bornean bird,
which, with some doubt, he identified as being the true Na-
pothera umbratilis, Temm. (a manuscript title). Both species
were among some birds purchased by Mr. Wilson from M.
Verreaux, and which the latter gentleman, according to Mr.
Strickland, had confounded together, as both bore on their
labels Temminck’s MS. title already cited. Ever since it has
been a matter of great difficulty in Europe to determine
the species Mr. Strickland had before him, and which he
named 7. celebense—for the reason that the types of both
the Bornean and Celebean species went to America, that
the description of T. umbratile apud Strickland is very brief,
while that of T. celebense consists of nothing more than a
few words setting forth in what respect it differs from the
Bornean bird (a species not even now determined), and that
the figures of both birds are neither drawn nor coloured
satisfactorily.

But so long as only one species of the genus Trichostoma
was known to inhabit Celebes, and that species agreed suffi-
ciently well with Strickland’s brief description, that species
was, naturally enough, referred to T. celebense; and a single
example, obtained at Macassar by Mr. Wallace, was thus
identified by me (Tr. Z. 8. viii. p. 61).

Since then I have received from North Celebes several
examples of a species of Trichostoma widely differing from
what I supposed to be 7’. celebense ; and it becomes therefore
necessary to decide which of the two species best agrees with
Strickland’s account and figure of T. celebense. Dr. Otto
Finsch has also sent me for determination an example of this
genus, marked as being a male, obtained by Captain Conrad
in the district of Macassar. This bird differs but slightly
from the one obtained by Mr. Wallace, now in the British
Museum. After comparing the two species with Strickland’s
description and figure, I have little doubt that the Menado,
and not the Macassar bird, supplied the type of T. celebense,
Strickl.: consequently the Macassar form requires to be dis-
tinguished by a separate title; and for it I propose that of

SEB. I1I.—VOL. VI. 2c

me =
re ReaD

— peer inoue sca niee ee Se ee
5 rE Se ae sis
ae
SS a ge
=~
=

—
Li epas Puapend

een ey
oe

a
ee — Os

AO ae

- =

<<—e oe

if
t
i
i
i

378
Trichostoma finschi (Plate XI. fig. 1). It may be thus de-

scribed :—

& (Macassar). Chin and throat white, faintly tinged with
very pale fulvous. Breast, abdomen, flanks, under wing-
coverts, and thigh-coverts fulvous, tinged with rufous, pale
near the mesial line. Under tail-coverts rusty fulvous, redder
than the abdominal plumage. Head umber-brown, with a
slight olive tinge. Space before the eye greyish white. Cheeks
fulvous white. Back and uropygium rufous brown, the uro-
pygial feathers being voluminous and fluffy, and terminally
coloured pale rusty fulvous. Upper tail-coverts pure rust-
colour. Quills and rectrices ruddy brown, the outer webs
being distinctly rusty brown. The inner webs of the third and
following quills with a pale rusty fulvous edging for part of their
length, this edging being indicated at the base of the second
quill. Wing-coverts ruddy brown. Legs, feet, claws, and
lower mandible (in dried skins) pale yellowish white. Upper
mandible horny brown, commissure and tip pale yellowish
white. Iris (labelled) yellow. Wing 2°87 inches, tail 2°25,
tarsus 1:0. Rictus armed with very long bristles. First pri-
mary short, second about half an inch longer, third three
eighths longer than second; fourth, fifth, and sixth longer
than third, the fourth and sixth being nearly equal, and the
fifth the longest.

T. celebense, Strickl. (Menado) (Plate XI. f. 2). Whole head
above, nape, back, uropygium, and major wing-coverts rich red-
dish brown, purer brown on the head. The long loose uropy-
gial feathers tipped with ferruginous. Rectrices and outer
webs of the quills dark ferruginous chestnut (in another ex-
ample the outer webs of the quills concolorous with dorsal plu-
mage) ; inner webs brown. Lores ashy white. Cheeks and
ear-coverts brown. Chin, throat, and ventral region white or
ashy white. Breast pale cinereous. Flanks brown: Thigh-
coverts and under tail-coverts hight rust-colour. Upper tail-
coverts bright ferruginous. Legs, feet, and claws pale yel-
lowish. Base of maxilla blackish brown; remainder, with
mandible, pale horn-colour. Rictal bristles black, not very
stiff, and extending beyond the basal half of the bill. Wing

Lord Walden on a new. Species of Trichostoma.

5 hi

man

GKeu

On two Species of Odontophorine. 879

2°75 inches, tail 2°37, tarsus ‘98, bill:75. Gradation of quills
as in 7’. finschi. |

The examples described by Dr. F. Briiggeman (Abhandl.
nat. Ver. Bremen, v. p. 63. no. 57) appear to be T. celebense,
Strickl., according to my views.

XXXVI.—On two additional Species of Central-American
Cdontophorine. By Ossert Satvin, M.A., F.R.S., &e.

Turoucu Mr. Boucard’s kindness I have lately been able to
add to our Central-American collection of birds two species
of Odontophorine, one of which is the tolerably common
South-American Hupsychortysx leucotis, the other a species of
Odontophorus which I do not hesitate to describe below as
new. ‘The two specimens (one of each species), were con-
tained in two collections evidently made by our late collector,
Enrique Arcé, in Veragua, one of which came directly, and
the other indirectly into Mr. Boucard’s hands. Both from
the style in which the skins are made up, and from the bird-
skins associated with them, there cannot be the slightest
doubt as to their origin.

Evupsycuortyx tevucotis, Gould, P. Z. S. 1843, p. 183, et
Mon. Odont. pl. x.

The specimen sent agrees closely with examples from the
province of Antioquia procured by Mr. Salmon, and with Mr.
Gould’s plate. The only difference I can trace is in the paler
ferruginous colour of the throat, a somewhat variable cha-
-racter in this group. Arcé has lately been working in the
district round Calobre; and here, probably, this specimen
was procured. I have seen no other specimen of this form
from the districts northward of Panama upon the authen-
ticity of whose origin I could rely.

ODONTOPHORUS CINCTUS, Sp. 0.

Capite, collo, dorso antico et pectore lete rufescentibus, auri-
cularibus nigris : stria postoculari indistincta e punctulis
albis formata: dorso postico cinereo, albo et nigro minute
vermiculato : supracaudalibus rufescentibus, scapularibus

ty i
i
i |
ia (
wa
‘a eel
iy ip,
iwi ay
4 {
Hb en
Ais
‘ae Wig
‘ape at
nN t
4 HH
ty
me | , ¥
i
4 hi |
/
be OPT) 4
1\8

ew;

Er
=
aoe meas

i
if
ne
(

Letters, Announcements, &c.

extimis nigris, scapis albis et pogoniis externis rufescen-
tibus: alis fuscis, secundariis rufo variegatis : gula et
ventre medio albis, hypochondriis et crisso distincte nigro
transfasciatis ; rostro nigro : pedibus fuscis: long. tota cir.
7°5, alee 4°3, caudee 1°8, tarsi 1°3, rostri a rictu 6.

Hab. Veragua (Arcé).

This species is quite distinct from any hitherto described.
rate It is smaller than even O. thoracicus, to which it is perhaps
| most nearly allicd. The white throat and belly, the strongly
marked flanks, together with the deep rufous colour which
encircles the whole of the anterior part of the body, neck, and
head, render it a conspicuous species.

XXX VII.—Letters, Announcements, &c.

The following letters, addressed ‘To the Editor of ‘The
Ibis,’ ’’ have been received :—

Sir,—lI beg leave to offer the following short notes on several
species of birds found in Corsica as an appendix to Mr. C.
B. Wharton’s paper on the ornithology of that island (anted,
p- 17). ITalso add the names of seven species which came
under my notice in the years 1865-66, as well as seven extra
species observed in 1875.

The only general observation I should like to make is that
; a considerable proportion of the individuals of the different
a species seems as though they only made Corsica a temporary
\) halting-place on their journey northwards; and I feel con-
. fident that if a really perfect and trustworthy list of Corsican
i birds could be noted, say during a term of three or more years,
| the number of species would be found to be comparatively
limited, and that of the spring migrants bear but a small pro-
portion to the entire list. In the case of several species, both
Mr. C. B. Wharton and myself would come across a con-
siderable number of individual birds during a few consecutive
days, after which they were suddenly lost sight of. Could
any ornithologist be found who would furnish us with a list,
such as I have already suggested, of the birds of Corsica and
Sardinia, coupled with a very accurate record of dates, eleva-

Letters, Announcements, &c. 881

tion at which they were found, height of flight while migrating,
&c., I think he would be rendering good service by furnishing
data which would at all events assist in throwing some light
on the details of the mystery of migratory journeys, a class
of information much required.

Except for its geographical position in connexion with the
question of migration, lying, as it does, in a direct line with
the African coast, Sardinia, and the shores of Southern
Europe, I consider that Corsica offers but a poor field to the
ornithologist.

In the case of Hirundo rustica, I noticed, as did Mr. Wharton,
that amongst a large flock seen on the 17th April, near Lake
Bigulia, the colouring of the belly appeared to vary much ;
so we shot a large series in hopes of identifying H. rufula,
but did not succeed. The bellies of those obtained varied
from pure white to pale chestnut.

Merops apiaster merits some notice, as the conditions under
which we met with that bird suggest to my mind that Corsica
is only a temporary halting-place for many of the summer
migrants from Africa. This bird was first observed at the
end of April; and though undoubtedly many remain to breed
amongst the sand banks near the lagoons on the east coast,
still the main body of these birds pass on northwards to the
mainland. ‘The Bee-eaters we saw were flying northwards
at a considerable altitude, out of gunshot.

Turdus merula also deserves a notice. ‘This species is very
plentiful during the winter; and afewremain to breed. Mr.
Wharton and myself found two nests with eggs on the 15th
and 17th April. Both 7. merula and T’. musicus are essen-
tially winter visitants, arriving, as they do, in thousands—so
much so, that the right of snaring these birds is let to Italians,
who come over expressly for the purpose of capturing them.
The greatest part of the “catch” is either converted into
Pdté de Merles de Corse, a delicacy much esteemed on the
continent, or the birds themselves are shipped to Marseilles
in the flesh. They are of three qualities :—1st, those that feed
on the berries of the myrtle; 2nd, those that subsist on the
fruit of the juniper ; 3rd, those that feed on the olive,—and are

382 Letters, Announcements, &c.

valued in the order stated. I make mention of these facts
simply to show that the migration of this species is remark-
able in its character.

Perdix rubra. This species is still very plentiful. Their
apparent scarcity in spring, mentioned by Mr. Wharton, is
owing to the terrible persecution they receive at the hands
of the natives, who poach irrespective of close time, and
moreover destroy whole coveys, either by torch-light or
when the birds come to drink. I may also add that the Red-
legged Partridge is a very difficult bird to spring without
a very good dog; and the situations in which it is found are
so rocky, inaccessible, and clothed with dense cover, that
the birds escape detection except by a most indefatigable
sportsman.

List of Species obtained by me in Corsica in 1865 and 1866,

_ Aquila chrysaetus. 'Two specimens in the flesh, shot near
Corte, both decidedly smaller than the usual type of Golden
Eagle. Unfortunately I did not take measurements, and the
skins have long since disappeared.

Buteo vulgaris. Common all along the east coast.

Circus cyaneus. In the flesh; procured from the plain
near Lake Bigulia. :

Scops giu. Bought in the market at Bastia, where they
hung for sale, partly plucked, to show the fat !

Coccothraustes vulgaris. Bought in the market at Bastia.

Anas strepera. Shot by myself at Lake Biguila.

Mergus albellus 2. Given me in the flesh; shot on Lake
Bigulia.

List of Species, 1875.

Pandion haliaetus. A skin. Bird procured 1874 at Lake
Bigulia. A pair or two are to be seen on most of the lagoons
on the east coast.

Phasianus colchicus. In the flesh; shot at Aleria, on the
east coast, where there are a few of these birds. When they
were introduced into the island I cannot find out.

Podiceps cristatus. In the flesh; shot on Lake Bigulia,
not uncommon on the lagoons on the east coast during winter.

Letters, Announcements, &c. 883

Podiceps minor. Seen killed on Lake Bigulia.

Himantopus melanopterus. Fresh, and skin in course of
being mounted. Shot at Aleria.

Machetes pugnaz. ist February; shot by me near Lake
Bigulia; the only one seen. __

Anser segetum. In the flesh. Shot near Lake Bigulia,
Not very plentiful winter visitant.

Yours faithfully,

W. JEssz.
24th April 1876.

Dresden, May 15th, 1876.
Zoological Museum.

Sir,—In ‘The Ibis’ for April, page 246, a passage, quoted
from Dr. Beccari’s “ Ornithological Letter,’ could be inter-
preted as if I got my Arfak birds from the missionary of
Andei. I beg leave to state, as I have already in several
other journals where Beccari’s interesting ‘ Ornithological
Letter’ was published, that my birds were hunted in 1873,
partly by myself and my company on the southern slopes of
the Arfak mountain-chain, partly in two expeditions of my
hunters, which were organized and directed by myself, ad
hoc, from the northern base of the mountains, where I was
obliged to remain ill with fever, acquired in the swamps
of the MacCluer Gulf. The heights reached on these expe-
ditions were 3500 and 5500 feet respectively. ‘The ornitho-
logical result of these Arfak tours amounted to 500 birds,
many of which were and still are in the hands of my ornitho-
logical friends in your country. You will find the details of
these trips, accompanied by the necessary notes, on the two
maps which I hope soon have the pleasure of sending you.

Yours very truly,
A. B. Mryzr.

June 9th, 1876.
Sir,—The name of Astur cruentus was first published in
the P. Z. S. for 1842, when it was applied by Mr. Gould to
the Goshawk of Western Australia.

884, Letters, Announcements, &c.

It has subsequently been applied, but incorrectly, as it seems
‘to me, to some other allied species, including the Hawk of
the Fiji Islands (Astur rufitorques of Peale).

Mr. Layard, following Drs. Finsch and Hartlaub, has re-
ferred to this species under the name of A. cruentus in his
interesting papers on the birds of the Fiji Islands (anted,
p. 144, and P. Z.S. 1875, p. 424) ; and I am therefore de-
sirous of pointing out that Astur rufitorques is treated as a
separate and distinct species by Mr. Sharpe in his recent
work on the Diurnal Birds of Prey—in which, as it seems
to me, he is undoubtedly correct ; the descriptions of the two
species given by Mr. Sharpe will suffice to show the differ-
ences between them; and I therefore need not here mention
these in detail.

I desire, however, also to allude to the Harrier of the Fiji
Islands (Circus approximans of. Peale), which is referred to
by Mr. Layard (again following the nomenclature of the
Bremen ornithologists) as Circus assimilis (vide P. Z. 8. 1875,
p. 424).

I have only seen one example of the Fijian Harrier, an
immature male, collected by Mr. Layard, and in the posses-
sion of Lord Walden, who kindly permitted me to examine it.
This Harrier is not a specimen of the true Circus assimilis
(C. jardinit of Gould), but resembles the immature plumage of
Circus wolfi, and also that of Circus gouldi, with which latter
Mr. Sharpe identifies Circus approximans. Whether the
Fijian Harrier is really referable to C. wolfi or to C. gouldi,
or is distinct from both, is a point which cannot be settled
with certainty until an adult male is procured and carefully

examined.
I am yours &c.,

J. H. Gurney.
P.S. Lord Walden’s Fijian Harrier appears, by the ticket
attached to it, to have had in its stomach lizards and shrimps,
the latter a remarkable diet for a bird of this genus.

Srr,—A couple of examples of the rare Tern, Sterna albi-
gena, Riipp., shot on the Bombay coast near Hurnee (?) on

Letters, Announcements, &c. 385

the 25th March, 1875, have recently come under my notice,
and have been identified by our best authority on the Ster-
nine, Mr. Howard Saunders. This Tern has, I believe, been
only known to inhabit the Red Sea; and as it forms an ad-
dition to the fauna of India, its occurrence on the western
shores of that country may not be unworthy of record in
your pages.
Yours etc.,

WALDEN.
Jhislehurst, June 15, 1876,

Turin, June 15th, 1876.
Zoological Museum.

Sir,—I have just received from Dr. Briiggeman a copy
of his paper “ Beitrage zur Ornithologie von Celebes und
Sanghir,”’ printed in the ‘ Abhandlungen herausgegeben vom
naturwissenschaftlichen Verein zu Bremen,’ Band-v. S. 35-
102, Taf. 11., iv. (1876). I wish to make a few remarks on
some points already noticed in a paper which I have pub-
lished in the ‘ Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di
Genova,’ vol. vil. p. 641-681, tav. xvii. (1875), with the title
“Tntorno a due collezioni di Uccelli di Celebes, inviate al
Museo Civico di Genova dal Dr. O. Beccari e dal Signor A.
A. Bruijn.” Dr. Briggeman seems not to be acquainted
with my paper.

Page 51, Halcyon cyanocephala. 'The author confirms the
idea expressed by me that this species is really different from
Monachalcyon princeps.

Page 80, sp. 99, Ptslinopus melanocephalus, var. celebensis,
Briigg., is my Jotreron melanospila (Ann. Mus. Civ. Gen. vil.
p-. 671).

Page 80, sp. 100, Ptilinopus nuchalis, Briigg., seems to be
my I. xanthorrhoa (1. c.).

Page 81, Ptilinopus sulaénsis, Brigg., is my I. chrysorrhoa
I Be

Page 88, Megacephalon maleo. I have shown (J. c. p. 673)
that this bird was first described by S. Miller.

Page 94. The genus Schizoptila, Briigg., has the same
type as my genus Gymnocrez (1. c. p. 678).

SER. IlI.—VOL. VI. 2D

386 Letters, Announcements, 8c.

In the same paper, page 82, I find named a Ptilinopus
marginalis, Briigg., ex Nova Guinea et Salwatty, and a P.
senex, ex Jobi, which I have already discriminated and re-
spectively named P. trigeminus and P. geminus in another
paper of mine (Ann. Mus. Civ. Gen. vu. pp. 786, 787).

I take this opportunity to point out that Mr. Severtzoff,
in ‘Stray Feathers,’ vol. i. p. 480, mentions a Picus lepto-
rhynchus (previously described in ‘The Ibis,’ 1875, p. 487);
to it he refers a var. leucoptera, which Mr. Severtzoff iden-
tifies with my Picus leucopterus (Atti R. Ac. Sc. Tor. vi.
(1871) p. 129). I cannot make out how a species already
described can be considered as a variety of one described at
a later period ; it would have been only fair to acknowledge
a Picus leucopterus with a var. leptorhynchus..

I remain, dear Sir,
Yours &c.,
T. SaLvaporti.

Mr. Layard’s last letters from Fiji give us an account of
his own and his son’s doings up to the middle of May last.
_ He was then on the point of leaving for New Caledonia, to
which island he has recently been appointed H.M. Consul.
As soon as he is settled in his new home his son purposes
visiting New Hebrides and the adjoiming islands; and Mr.
Layard promises that we shall soon hear more of both of
them from their new field of operations. As a last contri-
bution to the ornithology of Fiji, Mr. Layard sends us a
paper which, received at the last moment, we regret to be
obliged to defer publishing till our next number.

THE IBIS

THIRD SERIES.

No. XXIV. OCTOBER 1876.

XXX VITI.—Description of a new Species of Flycatcher (My-
iagra) from the Fijis, and some Remarks on the Distribution
of the Birds found in those Islands. By Epvgar Lroroip
Layarp, C.M.G., F.Z.S., lately administering the Govern-
ment of that Colony.

Every fresh excursion in pursuit of our favourite science,
made either by my son or myself, to any new ground in these
islands, impresses me more and more with the interesting
character of the avifauna, as exhibited in the distribution and
localization of species and in their variation. The accom-
panying Table shows, so far as our present knowledge extends,
the distribution of birds on some of the chief islands which
we have visited. It will serve for a beginning; and I doubt
not that further research into the interior of both the large
islands of Viti Levu and Vanua Levu, of the eastern group
of small islands (in the northern portion of which are Loma
Loma and Mango), and of the western, or Yasawa group,
will yield many additions to the list of the birds of Fiji.

A few remarks must be made as to the localities in which
the birds here enumerated were collected. On Ovalau we have
chiefly worked the eastern side, round the town of Levuka.

SER. III.—VOL. VI. 2 E

388 Mr. E. L. Layard on a new

Wakaia we pretty well ransacked ; from Mokane, which ad-
joins it, I inspected a small collection. Our knowledge of
Vanua Levu is restricted to the neighbourhood of Bua (Sandal-
wood Bay). Here Messrs. Holmes, Swayne, and Tempest
were kind contributors; and my son spent a month at the
eastern end of the island. Mr. Kleinschmidt (Herr Godef-
froy’s collector) has worked the southern side; but, with the
exception of Lamprolia minor (Kleinsch.), I know of nothing
new that he has procured. He told me that he obtained the
Orange Dove (Chrysena victor), Platycercus tabuensis, and.
other known species. Taviuni was well worked by my son
and myself at Ngila, on the north-eastern side, and skimmed
by Mr. Tempest about Vuna Point, further south. My
son and I visited Loma Loma and Mango, which I place
together, but had not time for much real work. I have
visited the whole of the maritime districts of Viti Levu; and
though I had no opportunity of collecting, I used my eyes.
My son has made several trips up the Rewa river, and stayed
a month at Suva, on the south-east end. I have also paid
these localities flying visits, and have received small collec-
tions from two kind contributors on the Rewa, Messrs. Storck
and Abbott. At Kandavu I stayed some days, and saw the
whole of the ‘ Challenger’ collection made there; and my
servant, collecting for Mr. Ramsay, of the Sydney Museum,
worked there for some weeks and obtained several new species,
which I do not describe, as they belong to Mr. Ramsay, but
simply indicate.

The Sea-fowl and Waders require more attention. Though
we have added several to the list, I am sure the low-lying
Yasawa Islands and the eastern group will furnish many more ;
so also will the Ringgold Islands to the north-east. It was on
these latter that the Earl of Pembroke was wrecked; and he de-
scribes the vast numbers of birds on the island on which they
landed (see ‘South Sea Bubbles. By the Earl and the Doctor’).
As the Sea-fowl are naturally a wandering race, I have left a
column in the Table expressly for them, indicating by the point
of the compass the portion of the group where I have chiefly
seen the species. The acquisition by my son of the rare little

Species of Flycatcher, &c. 389

Curlew (Numenius femoralis, Peale) afew days ago at “ Cocoa-
nut Point,’ m Sandalwood bay, adds a most interesting
novelty to our list. He saw a pair of them, but only suc-
ceeded in securing the female. It must be very scarce, as
we have kept a special leok-out for it, but until this moment
without effect. .

During his visit there he also procured the very interesting
new Flycatcher I am about to describe, and established the
distinctness of Myzolestes buaensis, which is just intermediate
between M. vitiensis, Hartl., and M. macrorhyncha, nob., and
of Piilotis similis, nob., from P. carunculata, Gmel. He also
procured specimens of both sexes of my new Blackbird (Me-
rula vitiensis) in splendid plumage.

MytaGRra CASTANEIGULARIs, Layard, sp. nov.

Male. Upper parts dark ashy blue; crest on head short,
azure ; underparts, chin, throat, and upper portion of chest
bright clear chestnut ; thence to the vent white; tail-fea-
thers partly white and partly of the colour of the back,
the extended pair being white from the tip to two thirds of
their length, the others less and less white, until the centre
pair have the merest white edge to the tip; bill rich orange;
legs ash-coloured ; iris dark brown. Length 5" 6", wing 3”,
tail 2" 10", bill 10”, tarse 10”.

Female rusty grey above; top of head dark ashy blue;
below coloured like the male, but less brilliantly.

Found in the high tree-forest at Kandi (Bua) feeding on
insects; in habits and note resembling its ally M. azureo-
capilla, Layard. 3

This elegant Flycatcher closely resembles its prototype
M. azureocapilla, from Taviuni (which is separated from
Vanua Levu by a narrow strait), and is another illustration
of the variation of species found in these islands. ‘The upper
parts are precisely similar (when the tail is closed, so that
the white ends of the feathers do not show), with the exception
of the crest, which, though similarly coloured, is shorter. On
the underparts the dark chestnut of the throat is changed into
a singularly bright chestnut; and the white of the abdomen,

2H2

390 | Mr. E. L. Layard on the

and vent especially, is purer, the latter in M. azureocapilla
being “ isabella ”’-coloured.

It replaces the latter species on Vanua Levu in the same way
that the little Lamprolia minor, Kleinsch., replaces L. victorie.
The two, with the exception of a trifling difference in the bril-
liancy of the centre portion of the back of the head, are exactly
similar; but the former is a third less in size than the latter.

The same may be said of Myiolestes buaensis, nob. ; while
Pitilotis similis, nob., which extends to Taviuni, may be dis-
tinguished from P. carunculata of Loma Loma by having
pale yellowish grey ear-tufts instead of bright golden yellow.
It is also generally less brightly plumaged—less yellow-tinted
on the breast. | -

The fine examples of Merula vitiensis, nob., which my son
procured, enable me to add some additional particulars to my
- previous description*. The abdomen and lower part of the
chest in a fine adult male are a warm ruddy chestnut, and the
vent is white. In the female the chestnut is toned down to
a faint brown tint, and the white vent is very circumscribed. »

I have already in another place (anted, p. 141) expressed
my opinion that Platycercus tabuensis was introduced into
Koa (Tonga Islands) from Fiji. My son made a special visit
to the aged chief “Tui-Bua” (lit. “ King of Bua,” pronounced
in the missionary jargon Tuimbua) for the purpose of getting
information on this point. The old man, whose mother was
a Tongan woman from Hoa, said that from time immemorial,
ever since the Tongans gained a footing in Fiji (which was
only in the districts where this variety of P. splendens is found,
not in the southern portions where the bright-coloured race
exists), it has been their custom to take tamed examples of Pla-
tycercus and Lorius to Tonga for the purpose of periodically
plucking their crimson feathers for ornamenting fans &c.

I feel more than ever convinced that the Eoa Parrots have
sprung from introduced birds t.

* [We have not been able to find Mr. Layard’s description of this
Thrush.—ED. |]
T (See P. Z. 8. 1876, p. 808, for an extract from Labillardiére’s ‘ Voyage

in search of La Perouse,’ where the introduction of Parrots into Tonga-
taboo from Fiji is mentioned as early as 1793.—Eb. |

Distribution of Fijian Birds. 391

Bua is the great, if not the only habitat for Pachycephala
graffi, Hartl.; and my son procured a fine series of them.

A reference to the Table will show how the different species
of this genus, and of Pétlotis and Myialestes, are distributed
over the group and yet confined to circumscribed localities.

In the accompanying Table birds whose names are pre-
ceded by * are peculiar to Fiji. They amount to exactly one
half of our at present known species.

Tabulated List of Fijian Birds, showing their distribution in
some of the principal Islands, as far as is known up to
the present date.

s
do
ord =|
S| | |e
td
oO} | [eB
= = 3
5} (ob) g 3 °
Sai Sele].
S/S elHI13ia|
S| s Sieidic| «A
S13)5/.5 a
elelSlfFl/Eraia =
> Sila] Olea |S iy
SEPA EM! =
PE ACG LUTMIALUS Jo 5 cm yas aise vn eee es Phat od ea rac
2. wastureriientius, Goud... eles x fe lel ae fae |e |e
oR COVA 0 402) ie an a re x le lel alae tae tae
4, Strix delicatula, Gowld .. 0.0... 08 ee ee alae le ale le
5. Otus? UG itty ana e ea wae ai atte ANSE Sed BENT | ig
*6. Platycercus splendens, Peadle............|..[.e[e+ ols eta hae
fe tabuensis, G'mel. Wares of Pio}. eal
ro, koroensis, Layard (c); splendens.
*9, —— taviunensis, Layard ( Koro only. (|..}..]--|x
*10 DOr SOTE GUS BUNTY crits en's areee’es stele wtes|é ashe wil ae
Sel Orie SONOS, LUCK. Cn ete eke bef xl le) el adel x
*12. Trichoglossus aureocinctus, Layard...... gle efeel alee] x
13. Eudynamis taitiensis, Sparrm.........+. * | x
PPS CCUM Ss SEMIUS, ECAC ii. ee hie 'n 8s oo ce 0 ala lalate ela lx
*15. EPUUISCA GID LOTT, oois's so evs wd 8s ie ge | es BAD
p10. taaicyonicadsini,ad’. G17. (a)... 0.5 8.08% *
i Wee BACPR AIA LCI. ty Wis wis Ki vale we ie Flee es Pa Se a ae ee
18. Collocalia vanicoroensis, Quoy (e).
19, spodiopygia, Peale o...eseressnes xl | ala] ef ae
20, Eirunde tahitica, Gyrel. ee ee Par an a a
*21. Myzomela jugularis, Peale ........ wee elaelae |e fae | ae tae | oe
22. nigriventris, Peale (f) .......eeeeele- eV hetele tae. big
23, Pislotie carunculata, Girne... i... eels ehes Papen] rome

+ [According to Mr. Gurney this Hawk should be called Astur rufi-
torques, Peale. Cf. antea, p. 3845; see also Mr. Gurney’s note on the Fijian
Harrier, here called Circus assimilis—Ep., |

392 Mr. E. L. Layard on the

S
do
ot =
s| |
©
ale] |g
© si.
eke a ony Gs He a
afa/sis/eHis| 8
SEPIA E NM =
*24. Piilotis procerior, £3 G He... esses oh ae Pee xe | &
*25. SMS PLANE os ok he Wine Wath eee ierell ate | Pe *%
| *26, —— provocator, Layard wicccecesveees OH Teds’ eae The ation Mas
MOT oLatare?. viridis, Layard 1 n,n pen scent vee ole
*28. Leptornis f PK) ERS 3d Sh odeowd eu aay yw stg aot ae
+ *29. Losterops flaviceps, Peale... 2. ica. «sas « glelel xl elxla
1 *30. explorator, Layard ...... St bee dae os Pe
a *31. Myiagra castaneiventris, Verr......... well ae ele l ale
aD. castaneigularis, Layard ...... 5 eed ee ee
i *33 azureocapilla, Layard ....ccssceeslealeds- *
| -*34, Monarcha lessoni, Homb. .........000-- xlaelelele-lalx
| Ge | *35. Petroica vitiensis, Pinsch ...........6% A ee er ee
mL "36. Merala bicolor, (Layard ses a.uct see ee es Boy a Pay vat aa ke a
Rae Ti .*87. —— vitiensis, Zayard ......0.00cccaes Ale
aa *38. temmpestit, Bayard yo. sss s cana sees ea] abe oie
hil *39. Rhipidura albicollis, Layard............ x | #1 &/ x
a *40, Sag ie een eee Oe Hee ee | ck el orale
. *41, Lamprolia victorie, F. & H........... ae *%
a P*A9, minor, Klemschmidt .......cce eee era
ia | *48, p P (tted-head 44)! ose.) ae os Leal tre her garelveeah ie
pi | 44, Lalage terat, Bodd. ............ coeseele lal aelalalal a
*45, Pachycephala graffi, Hartl..... se 9 > mney ee
*46, —— vitiensis, Gray .........45. » oss pipe aie R pe at etts ieaaita
As, tctoroides) Peale. naps seis aes #
*48, intermedia, Layard ..........6e. oy | sothe pigs bt yp
*49, torquata, Layardiinnsdte., £25 )% RT osheed ap
*50, ? nigrogularis, Layard (j) ...... Sie aed eve ochapra toe
/*51. Myiolestes vitiensis, Hartl. ............ ip hsitledeelae bat
*52, macrorhyncha, Layard........0.4. ote Wl ae
*53. —— buaénsis, Layard ...... AR oss ae fal ealee
*DA4, compressirostris, Layard ....... Thales |a bile ttetetoihia ae
*55. Ein) Beene othe rete Apel) oneal etl ide
*56. Artamus mentalis, Jard, ......-6r0000. oe se se ae
*57. Aplonis vitiensis, Layard ..........6..5. se | ae fae] ae | ae ae
*58. Erythrura peal, Marth 2.05.05 nse es wie esailiep. degen hee
59. Ptilinopus perousii, Peadle.............. ele lee ela] ade
*60. TASCIR(US LAG. bake 4c pas stare aa S| hie ie ale
*61. Chryscéna luteovirens, Homb. 2... 000e4'| geilorslelede ole «big
*62. Micton, (pole ee ay etn beds i. JA Ree
*63. VITICIS ALONE, 2 Gg heele’s > 4) sks Pca an Hae Laandoae
64. Columba vitiensis, Quoy ...., is oboe ne xe |e] ele |e | oe | x
*65. Carpophaga latrans, Peale.............. #laelalaelalael x
66. pacifica, Gimel. ... sess cece sees Kl aelecle cle ol al x
6/7, -hlogcenas stair, Gray geese. ite wl ell aele |x |

+ [Referred by Count Salvadori (posted) to the genus Leptornis—Ep. | 3

or ae

Distribution of Fijian Birds. 393
5p
eS =
‘S B
VB aH. Laake.
alals Blas hed = Fa
EIS S|sS |e] &
SFI REI! =
*68. Rallina poeciloptera, Hartl.......,..... i eh? Roy
OU w idle pestorabsy Less: os ietison Jakes Oa « :
70. Gis niaates tabuensis, Gnel. .......... : 7 = i : : “ s
(ae quadristrigata, Horsf. ...... 0.005. Ee Sra Paes ae
(2.2 orpbyrio vitionsis, Peale. oe wl ae fae | oe | ae | ae!
73. Limosa uropygialis, Gould (2) .......... Ate eye | eer Ue
74, Numenius femoralis, Peale ............ Ok PONG cdl pol Aled NG
46. Actitis incanus (Gimel.) 5.06 ie otis ose ol nN ao tre eee a ae OP
Jo. Cloradring tulvus, Gel... oc ieg-e e once ENP E . cihy avi < = patel Aas
Fi.vourepsilas interpres’(L.). Sink secs te Pelee ites ls ils «| ae Le si OLO
75. Apier sacra, Gm ne ere, 1G LO. eee oP a baa Pine es ea es a
79, Ardea javanica, orate) olen neal. § Peete) ele ged x
80. Dendrocygna vagans, Hyton........004. seabed ash pevall ae
Pas SUDSTCLIOSE OT WIEL, yc ecia as Wenge Bev wlscclh el oat wen tar Sip We
ee VCVIs OREN UC. Og fs os yg s 6 ste aceig an Ge a at
83 longipennis, Nordm. (m) .......... oa eer
84. —— melanauchen, Temm. .......+..4 RAN IED coseh ah elie cmike ca + OC
85, —— lunata, Peale ....... cee RsuENS sgteh donot sihisus| «otek us
86. ICs ET Ra ray CME © Pee Os al ils | 0 oil wvas|'o; «4,6 0
Ole AUOUs SUOLMLUS (la) oy ss oes y Focehubee «ate Pals cali « (S.E.
88. lemeoeapillus; Gowld ov... Sele. hay ns a eee
89. CITES LV CROUR aris ce YA ws he WE EPR a POR wale IN eo
90. Gygis alba (Sparrm.) 2... .00.0.0% Sees oe Meals, lsodeceye apo las
91. Larus LLC SRD? chi Ma. ae eae a %
92. Thalassidroma macgillivrayi, Gray (m) ..|..|..|..{..|.efeefee| ?
Vee Mi MUG Use OOP. 5. db nekicees boop Ala’ yah iat als eb yl 2 alt Dee
94, Procellaria caerulea, Gouldt ............|+- da tapals ate chap tes INGE:
95. Diomedia melanophrys, Temm.(0)...... rile bee eatets ey
96. Phaéton rubricauda, Bodd. ............ hl ae site Alans
97 OLR Ot eles he eee oy Ss. es oy o5 Hs rN
98 Cand ids, re fas metied Win nes Bias Be h=. alte selene Lae cena
ee VS OPUS EL vc? we as as does > thks endihshe ckeiis akc Le
LOOM Tachy petes aquiltsy Dee. et apes a ass.

(a) I have not seen this bird, but enter it on the authority of Baron
von Hiigel. It was shot on the Rewa by Mr. Storck.

(6) My son, Mr. Leopold Layard, and others have seen a large brown
Owl on several occasions; but none have reached my hands.

+ [ @strelata leucoptera, Gould, may be added to this list, as we have
recently examined a specimen of this species in the Paris Museum, which
was brought by M. Filhol from the Fiji Islands.—Ep. ]

394 - Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Trochilide.

(d) I do not think this is a good species; I include it on the authority
of Drs. Finsch and Hartlaub, with their mark of f.

(e) Included on the above authority. They give no special locality.

(f) Ditto. Itissaid to have been found in Sandalwood Bay ; but none
of my collectors have seen it, and I doubt the statement.

(g) A fine new species, entirely green, with yellowish legs and bill,
just discovered by Herr Godeffroy’s collector.

(2) Discovered by Mr. Ramsay’s collector, therefore not named.

(«) Ditto. I know not to what genus to refer this bird.

(J) I originally placed this bird, provisionally, in the genus Lalage, not
having any works of reference at hand for consultation. Itcertainly does
not belong there, and is nearer Myvolestes. [A typical Myvolestes, fide
Finsch, P. Z.S. 1876, p. 20.—-Ep. |

(k) Discovered by Mr. Ramsay’s collector. The giant of the genus.

(2) The letter U after this name and others stands for “Ubique,” the |
species being generally distributed on our seaboard and in our seas.

(m) Included on the authority of Drs. Finsch and Hartlaub, who give,
on G. R. Gray’s authority, the locality Ngau Island.

(x) I did not see this bird, which was picked up not far from Mr.
Kleinschmidt’s house, and taken to him; he assures me it was a genuine
Larus.

(0) ‘este Baron von Higel.

[To this list must be added the species allied to Orthotomus recently de-
scribed by Dr. Finsch (P. Z. 8. 1876, p. 19) as Drymochera badiceps.—Ep. |

Levuka, May 20, 1876.

XXXIX.—WNotes on the Trochilide. The Genera Heliothrix,

Calliphlox, Catharma, and Petasophora. By D. G. Exxior,
F.R.S.E. &e.

Genus Hetiorurix.

Tue members of the genus Heliothriz are possessed of
graceful form and a plumage of a pleasing contrast of green
and white. They have long tails, the female’s being longer
than that of the adult male. The three species are dis-
tributed generally over Central and South America, not, how-
ever going south of Brazil on the east coast, nor Peru on the
west. In reviewing the geographical distribution of the.
species, we see that Guatemala is the most northern country
which any of them inhabit; and here is found H. barroti,
which goes through Central America, Columbia, into Ecuador,

Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Trochilide. 395

but has never to my knowledge been met with east of the
Andes. No other species of the genus, beside H. barroti,
is found in Central America. In South America the coun-
tries of Guiana, Venezuela, Columbia, Ecuador, Peru, and
Northern Brazil possess H. auritus, which is the most widely
distributed species of the genus. H. auriculatus is app-
rently confined to Southern Brazil; but how far it extends its
range to the northward is not yet definitely ascertained.

The three species comprising the genus Heliothrixv, accord-
ing to this paper, can easily be distinguished from each other,
and they constitute two natural groups, as follows :—

A. Head metallic green,

PARED PEW INLG areas nels: ce ea ee fa sk baiok eh Be HT, auritus.
be, Turoat metallic greeny v.06 a othe es Salo t..aureculatesl
B. Head metallic purple, throat ore He tthe ee HI, barrott.

HELIOTHRIX AURITUS.

Trochilus auritus, Gmel. Syst. Nat. (1788) vol. i. p. 493,
sp. 47. :

Heliothrix auritus, Gould, Mon. Troch. vol. iv. pl. 218 ; id.
Intr. Troch. (8vo ed.) p. 121. sp. 238.

Heliothriz longirostris, Gould, P. Z. 8. 1862, p. 124.

Hab. Northern Brazil, Guiana, Venezuela, Columbia, Ecua-
dor, Peru.

Gmelin described this species as above cited; and it was
the only one belonging to this genus known to the older
authors. It has not received many synonyms, the principal
one being that bestowed by Lesson upon the female, which
he called Ornismya nigrotis (Ind. Gen. et Syn. Ois. du Gen.
Trochilus, p. 20. sp. 48). As will be seen, the range of this
species is very extensive; and it is found from Brazil over the
northern part of South America, southward to Peru on the
east coast. Specimens from Ecuador were described by Mr.
Gould, in the ‘ Proceedings’ of the Zoological Society of
London for 1862, as distinct, under the name of H. longi-
rostris, characterized as differing from H. auritus in its “larger
size, longer bill, and the crown devoid of the glittermg hue
seen in H. auritus; at the same time it is somewhat brighter
than the back.” A specimen in my collection, obtained from
Mr. Gould, represents this form. I have carefully compared

396 | Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Trochilidee.

it with H. auritus, and I fail to discover any character which
should cause it to be separated from that species. The bill
is slightly longer, though hardly perceptibly so; there is no
difference in the general measurements of the body; and the
head and back are of about the same brilliancy as is ob-
served in ordinary specimens of H. auritus. I therefore
placed H. longirostris among the synonyms of the present
species.

HELIOTHRIX AURICULATUS.

Trochilus auriculatus, Nordm. Erman’s Reise um die Erde,
p- 5, t. 2. figs. 1 & 2 (1835).

Heliothrix auriculatus, Gould, Mon. Troch. vol. iv. pl. 214 ;
id. Intr. Troch. (8vo ed.) p. 121. sp. 239.

Heliothrix phainolema, Gould, P. Z. 8S. 1855, p. 87.

Hab. Southern Brazil; banks of Rio Napo (?) and Rio Ne-
gro (?) (Gould).

This bird was first described by Nordmann under a MS.
name of Lichtenstein’s.. Although similar to H. auritus, it is
readily distinguished by having the throat a brilliant metallic
green, instead of white. Itis apparently confined to Southern
Brazil. In 1855 Mr. Gould described Heliothrix phainolema
from specimens said to have come from the Rio Napo, and
which differed from H. auriculata in having the entire throat a
metallic green. In his monograph of the Trochilide he states
the locality of his specimens to be the Rio Negro in Northern
Brazil; and the figures on his plate being represented in pro-
file, the exact extent of the green throat-mark cannot be
perceived, while his description of “ chin, throat, and sides of
the neck rich luminous green” answers perfectly well for
adult male specimens of H. auriculatus lying before me. I am
inclined to think that Mr. Gould is in error with regard to
the locality of the specimens he described and figured (as he
gives such distant places as the habitat in his two statements),
and that he had merely fine adult males of H. auriculatus
before him when he published his description.

Having, in my own collection, specimens of the present
species that exhibit a varying amount of green on the throat,

Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Trochilidee. 397

im some extending a little distance below the chin, in others
almost reaching to the breast, I do not deem it a sufficient
character upon which to establish a species, and have con-
sequently placed H. phainolema as a synonym of H. auri-
culatus.

HELIOTHRIX BARROTI.

Trochilus barroti, Bourc. Rey. Zool. 1848, p. 72.

Heliothrix purpureiceps, Gould, P. Z.S. 1855, p. 87; id.
Intr. Troch. (8vo ed.) p. 121. sp. 241; id. Mon. Troch. vol. iv.
pl. 216.

Heliothrix barroti, Gould, Mon. Troch. vol. iv. pl. 217.

Heliothriz violifrons, Gould, Intr. Troch. (8vo ed.) p. 122.
sp. 242. |

Hab. Central America, Columbia, Ecuador.

This species was first described by Bourcier (/. c.) from
specimens contained in the Paris Museum, sent from Car-
tagena by M. Barrot, who was at that time stationed there
as the French Consul-General. In 1855 Mr. Gould rede-
scribed it as H. purpureiceps ; and in his Introduction to the
Monograph of the Trochilide he gives to a form of this
species, which he separates on account of the metallic colour-
ing on the head being restricted to the crown, the name of
H. violifrons. I find in my collection specimens of H. barroti,
procured on the volcano of Chiriqui by Arcé, which repre-
sent both the forms separated by Mr. Gould, thus showing
that the character he gives is not indicative of specific rank ;
for we cannot suppose that two species so closely allied as to
require very keen examination to perceive their differences
are to be found inhabiting the same country, much less the
same mountain. It would thus seem necessary to place H.
violifrons as a synonym of H. barroti, which I believe to be
its proper place.

Genus CALLIPHLOX.

But two species are at present included in this genus, one
of them being among the most common of this family. They
are characterized by long, slender, deeply forked tails, and

398 Mri De Ga Eillot-on the Trochitidan

with metallic throats, not particularly luminous. The two
species form but one group, distinguished as follows :—

Tail long and deeply forked.
THOR GMOUIYEES Bete tee ae Cate ones cate ae ome ated C. amethystina.
Phroat cleepeviOleti ss). sates seo cso haw eta tenet he C. mitchelli.

Considerable confusion has arisen among the synonyms of
the first of these species, owing to a distinct form, described by
Lesson and belonging to a different genus, having been con-
founded with it; and to rectify this error is the chief purpose
of this portion of my paper.

The species of Calliphlor inhabit both sides of: South
America—C. amethystina is found from Trinidad to Brazil,
being most abundant, perhaps, in the last-named country ;
while C. mitchelli has, as yet, so far as I am aware, been only
met with in Ecuador. It is not improbable that it may extend
its range into Peru, as I have one specimen said to have
come from that country; but I do not feel certain that the
locality is correctly given.

CALLIPHLOX AMETHYSTINA.

Trochilus amethystina, Gmel. Syst. Nat. i. p. 496 (1788).

Ornismya amethystina, Lesson, Hist. des Ois.-Mouches,
p. 150, pl. 47; id. Suppl. des Ois.-Mouches, pls. 20, 21, 22.

Calliphlox amethystina, Reich. Aufz. der Colibris, p. 12;
Gould, Mon. Troch. vol. 11. pl. 159 ; id. Intr. Troch. (8vo ed.)
p. 97. sp. 178.

Ornismya amethystoides, Less. Hist. Nat. Troch. p. 79,
pls. 25, 26, 27.

Calliphlox amethystotdes, Gould, Intr. Troch. (8vo ed.) p. 98.
sp. 179.

Trochilus brevicauda, Spix, Av. Bras. i. p. 79, t. 80. fig. 2?

Hab. Brazil, Venezuela, Trinidad.

This well-marked species was first described by Gmelin (J. c.)
from a specimen said to have come from Cayenne. Much
confusion has arisen in its nomenclature from the desire
among some writers to admit the examples from the province
of Minas Geraes as distinct from those found in other por-
tions of Brazil, and also to refuse specific rank to the Cayenne

Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Trochilide. 399

bird with a short square tail. This last determination, I am
led to believe, has arisen among Trochilidists simply from the
lack of proper specimens to enable them to form a judg-
ment. There are two synonyms only that at present need be
considered. here (that of Ornismya orthura of Lesson being
treated under a different head), the first beg Trochilus brevi-
cauda, Spix (l.c.). The figure and description of this author
have been taken from a female, the first so poorly done, and
the last so insufficient, as to render it absolutely impossible
to determine whether the bird belongs to this species or to
that one for which I have in this paper constituted the genus
Catharma. An examination of the type alone will enable the
question to be solved satisfactorily. I have therefore placed
Spix’s name among the synonyms of the present species with
a doubt. The second one is Ornismya amethystoides of
Lesson, distinguished chiefly by its rather small size. This
form is stated to come from the province of Minas Geraes,
in Brazil. I fail to distinguish any characters in specimens
from that locality that entitles them, in my opinion, to a
specific rank, and have placed the name O. amethystoides as a
synonym of C. amethystina. An example before me from
Minas Geraes, obtained from Mr. Gould, is in every respect
as large as specimens of C. amethystina from other parts of
Brazil, thus showing that the species varies in size even in
that province, and that this cannot be relied upon as a cha-
racter. As I am not aware that the female of C. amethystina
has ever been characterized, I append a full description of it.

Upper parts golden green, inclining to brownish on the
head. Entire underparts pale mouse-grey, lightest on the
throat, which is spotted with brown. Wings purplish brown.
Median rectrices bright metallic green; remaining rectrices
have the basal half light brownish grey, slightly washed with
a lustrous green, rest of feather black tipped with white. The
tail is rounded, and the feathers quite broad. Bull black.
Feet brown. Total length 34 inches, wing 14, tail 14, bill 3.

CALLIPHLOX MITCHELLI.
Trochilus mitchelli, Boure. P. Z. 8S. 1847, p. 47.

AOO Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Trochilide.

Calothorax mitchelli, Reich, Aufz. der Colib. p. 18.

Calliphloe mitchelli, Gould, Mon. Troch. vol. mi. p. 160;
id. Intr. Troch. (8vo ed.) p. 98. sp. 180.

Hab. Ecuador.

Bourcier described this species from an example in the
collection of the late Mr. Loddige, obtained at Zimapan, in
Eeuador. It still continues a rare species, but few specimens
having been sent to Europe. In form it is very similar to
the other members of this genus; but the peculiar deep-violet
throat will at all times serve to distinguish it.

Genus CATHARMA.

Bill longer than the head, broad at base, pointed at tip.
Wings long, reaching beyond the centre of tail, which is
extremely short and almost square. Throat-mark rounded,
metallic.

CaTHARMA ORTHURA.

Ornismya orthura, Lesson, Hist. Nat. des Troch. pp. 85, 88,
pls. 28, 29.

Hab. Cayenne.

As cited above, Lesson described this species, and figured
a male almost adult and a young bird. It has been con-
sidered by some authors to be the same as Calliphlox ame-
thystina, either the young of that species, or an old female!
(vide Gould, Intr. Troch. 8vo ed. p. 98). Upon what grounds
this last supposition should have arisen, | am at a loss to con-
ceive, as Lesson’s figure on pl. 28 1s evidently that of a male
in nearly adult plumage. Unfortunately the artist has not
coloured the tail properly, as he has represented it nearly all
black, whereas the description says of it ‘‘ en dessus, les moy-
ennes vertes et dorées, les latérales vertes et dorées a leur base,
puis noires a leur extrémité, excepté les deux plus externes,
qui sont terminées et ceillées de blane.”” This is lost in the
figure, as the underside of the tail alone is given. Having
lately come into possession of Lesson’s types of this species,
I am able to state that it not only is a perfectly distinct
species, but also represents an entirely new genus, most nearly

, ee = <=
= 5 ae Ge eee a ee oe =

y
i

|
*

Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Trochilide. 401

allied perhaps to Atthis. It has the form of Afthis, but the
general coloration of Calliphlox amethystina, Four speci-
mens are now before me, all from Cayenne—two adult males,
one young male, and one still in the dress of the female, the
sex being indicated by a few metallic spots upon the throat.
The males, as I have said, are similar in colour to C. ame-
thystina, but at once are seen to be conspicuously dif-
ferent from that species by their long bills and very short
square tails. [Fortunately these four specimens exhibit very
clearly the different stages the tail of the male assumes before
the bird arrives at maturity. At first the lateral rectrices are
brownish or purplish black, tipped with white ; then they
change to a golden green, with a terminal bar of purplish
black and the tip white, which in the adult disappears, or is
but faintly indicated underneath, leaving the tail golden
green with an apical purplish black bar. In this style of
coloration it in no way has the least resemblance to C.
amethystina, with which it has for so long been confounded.
M. Bourcier was clearly in error in his opinion, as quoted by
Mr. Gould (Mon. Troch. art. on C. amethystina), that the
orthura of Lesson was only the young of C. amethystina ;
and it was doubtless this opinion that led Mr. Gould astray :
it is difficult to understand how so good a Trochilidist as M.
Bourcier undoubtedly was should have gone so wide of the
mark as to confound such distinct species together. The
example figured by Mr. Gould as the female of C. amethys-
tina I should consider most probably the present species ;
for the female “ Amethyst” has quite a different dress, as my
description of that sex in this paper clearly shows. The bill
of Catharma orthura is very long, much longer than that
of the ‘“‘ Amethyst,” and is the more conspicuous probably on
account of the very short tail, which just projects beyond the
tips of the closed wings. Lesson’s descriptions being very
accurate, it will not be necessary for me to give one at pre-
sent. As I have said in my remarks on C. amethystina,
it is impossible to state what Trochilus brevicauda of Spix
really is, or to which of these species it should be referred ;
I have therefore deemed it best to leave it as a synonym of the

402 Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Trochilide.

Calliphlox (as has already been done by authors generally)
until I may be so fortunate as to meet with Spix’s type, when
the question can be effectually decided.

Genus PETASOPHORA.

The species forming this genus constitute a well-marked
group among the Trochilide; and each one contains characters
sufficient to distinguish it easily from the rest. The only
one allowed in this paper a specific rank of which there can
be any doubt is P. coruscans; and regarding it we can only
hope to obtain some future information which may enable
us to ascertain what is its proper position in the genus.

The species constitute two sections, distinguished as fol-
lows :—

A. General plumage green, metallic.
a. Upper part of throat and chin, ear-coverts, and ab-
domen deep blue; lower part of throat and breast

Heh panotallic gyeen Ay em aalek caine os Oe P. anus.
b. Throat and upper part of breast dark metallic green ;

ear-coverts and abdomen dark blue ............ P. thalassina.
ce, Ear-coverts violet-blue; throat and underparts me-

RALUIG OTOCN .: Gass, ata pewens cet ai ae oie ora 2 yk w CYUGROMA,
d, Ear-coverts, chin, and abdomen dark blue; throat

with metallic red reflections ...........2- 20005 P, coruscans.
e, Eay-coverts metallic purplish red; under tail-coverts

WhIEG Laccisl...: sitive 8 pe eiene eee aba ‘items P, serrirostris.

B. General plumage brown, not metallic.

a. Ear-coverts violet-blue; throat metallic green .... BP. delphine.

The members of the genus Petasophora, with one exception,
are widely distributed. P. anais is found from Venezuela,
throughout the countries lying along the Pacific, to and inclu-
ding Bolivia. P. thalassinais very common in Mexico, and
abundant in Guatemala. P. cyanotis has a most extensive
range, stretching from Costa Rica in the north, and Vene-
zuela in the east, as far south as Peru. /P. serrirostris is the
exception mentioned above, and is the only strictly eastern
species of the genus, being confined to Brazil, where it is met
with from Bahia to Rio de Janeiro. P. delphine is one of
the most widely distributed of Humming-birds, being found

Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Trochilidse. — 4.03

generally throughout Central America, Trinidad, the Gui-
anas, and along the northern and western countries as far
south as Peru. The habitat of P. coruscans is not known.

PETASOPHORA ANAIS.

Ramphodon anais, Less. Hist. Nat. des Troch. p. 146, pl. 55.

Petasophora anais, Gould, Mon. Troch. vol. iv. pl. 224;
id. Intr. Troch. (8vo ed.) p. 124. sp. 249.

Petasophora iolata, Gould, P.Z.S. 1847, p. 9. sp. 5; id.
Mon. Troch. vol. iv. p. 225; id. Intr. Troch. (8vo ed.) p. 124
sp. 250.

Hab. Venezuela, Columbia, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia.

Lesson described this bird in his ‘ Histoire Naturelle des
Trochilide,’ and erroneously gave its habitat as Mexico.
He also confounded with it one or two other species of the
same genus, supposing them to be immature examples of P.
anais. 'The specimens before me are from Columbia, Ecuador,
and Peru. Mr. Gould states that the form he has called
zolata has its true habitat in Bolivia, extending to Chili; but
I do not by any means find that this race is restricted to any
particular country west of the Andes. I have placed without
hesitation the name P. tolata among the synonyms of the pre-
sent species, as I do not see that it has any claims whatever to a
specific rank apart from P. anais. That there are specimens
of P. anais larger than others every one who has examined
these birds will readily admit; but they come from no especial
district, and therefore have not even the claim of being deemed
to belong to a geographical race. For instance, there are before
me specimens from Bogota representing the typical P. anais,
and also others from Antioquia, brought by Salmon, which are
as large as any so-called P. iolata from Peru or Ecuador. The
measurements are :—Bogota example, total length 43 inches,
bill on culmen {, wing 2{, tail 24; Antioquia specimen, total
length 54 inches, bill on culmen {, wing 34, tail 24. The entire
appearance of this latter bird is more robust than the one from
Bogota. Both forms are before me from Tinta, Peru, col-
lected by Whitely, the wings measuring respectively 2? and
34 inches—the latter intermediate, as will be noticed, between

SER. I1I.—VOL. VI. 2F

404 Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Trochilide.

the specimens given above; and there is also a difference in
the length of wing between specimens from the Rio Napo.
It is therefore very evident that size, upon which the sup-
posed species was given a distinctive rank, is not to be re-
lied on any more than is a particular locality ; and therefore
it is impossible to keep the two separate, as there is not a
single other character to distinguish them apart. And I the
more readily relegate P. iolata to the condition of a synonym,
as I do not understand wherein the study of ornithology is
advanced by the creation of species so closely related that
their distinctness cannot be discerned save by the assistance
of a pair of compasses.

PETASOPHORA THALASSINA.

Trochilus thalassinus, Swains. Phil. Mag. 1827, p. 441.

Petasophora thalassina, Gould, Mon. Troch. vol. iv. pl. 227 ;
id. Intr. Troch. (8vo ed.) p. 125. sp. 252.

Hab. Mexico, Guatemala.

A clearly marked species, most abundant in Mexico, but
extending its range into Guatemala. Resembling somewhat
in coloration P. anais, it is nevertheless a very much smaller
bird, and cannot be confounded with that species.

PETASOPHORA CYANOTIS.

Trochilus cyanotis, Bourc. Rev. Zool. 1843, p. 101.

Petasophora cabanidis, Heine, Journ. fiir Orn. 1863,
p- 182.

Petasophora cyanotis, Gould, Mon. Troch. vol. iv. ee 228 ;
id. Intr. Troch. (8vo ed.) p. 125. sp. 253.

Petasophora cabanisii, Lawr. Ann. Lyc. Nat. Hist. N. Y.
vol. ix. (1868) p. 126.

Hab. Venezuela, Costa Rica, Veragua, Columbia, Ecuador,
Peru.

A species with a very wide range, and apparently gene-
rally distributed in the different countries mentioned above.
The birds from Costa Rica, for which Heine proposed the
name of cabanidis (i. c.), are, im my opinion, not specifically

distinct ; and I have therefore placed this name as a syn-
onym.

Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Trochilide. 405

PETASOPHORA CORUSCANS.

Petasophora coruscans, Gould, P. Z. 8S. 1846, p. 44; id.
Mon. Troch. vol. iv. pl. 226 ; id. Intr. Troch. (8vo ed.) p. 125.
sp. 251.

Hab. ?

For a long time this bird has been a puzzle tome. Ido not
altogether like its appearance as a species; but at the same time
I cannot exactly understand what may have caused the pecu-
liar coloration of the throat. JI have only seen two speci-
mens—one in Mr. Gould’s collection, from which his figures
were taken, and one in my own, precisely similar, as was
proved on comparing the two together. ‘These are the only
examples, I believe, that have ever been procured ; and the
locality of neither is known. My specimen came in a large
lot of about 4000 birds, nominally from Bogota; and there
was no other in any way resembling it, although careful
search was made. I have tried the effect of heat upon other
specimens of Petasophora, to see if I could change the green
metallic colours to the red so conspicuous on the throat of
P. coruscans, but without success ; and I know of no acid with
which the bird in life or the skin afterwards would be likely
to have come into contact, that would produce the change.
With only a single specimen for us to form an opinion, we
should, not unnaturally, decide that it was a curious individual
variation ; but with ¢wo exactly alike, it would seem strange
that so peculiar a difference should have been produced acci-
dentally; and ifit had been, the thought naturally arises, Why
does it not occur oftener among the thousands of specimens
of the different species of Petasophora constantly brought to
Europe? That a similar style does exist, in one other in-
stance, is proved from the fact that I have an example of
Petasophora in my collection smaller than coruscans, and
evidently not the same species, which has the entire throat
a bright metallic red. This colour does not spread to the
chest, as is the case with the similar colour in P. coruscans,
but is restricted to the centre of the throat, which it entirely
covers. Now if P. coruscans is a distinct species, this unde-

2P2

406 Mr. D. G. Elhot on the Trochilide.

scribed bird is unquestionably entitled to the same rank ; but
as I do not feel satisfied that Mr. Gould’s bird should be so
considered, I refrain from characterizing my specimen. Per-
haps if the attention of ornithologists generally be directed to
this matter, we may be able to learn if there is really existing
a group of pink-throated Petasophore living in the interior
of Columbia or Ecuador, of which these examples have alone
reached Europe; for it has happened that specimens regarded
by naturalists as dusus nature, from their unusual appearance,
have eventually proved to represent very distinct forms ; and,
mindful of this fact, I do not at present feel inclined to place
P. coruscans among the synonyms of P. anais, nor bestow a
name upon the other form, which future evidence may show
ought to have been left undescribed. Better “learn to labour
and to wait.”

PETASOPHORA SERRIROSTRIS.

Trochilus serrirostris, Vieill. Nouv. Dict. d’Hist. Nat.
vol. vii. p.. 359 (1817).

Petasophora serrirostris, Gould, Mon. Troch. vol. iv. pl. 228 ;
id. Intr. Troch. (8vo ed.) p. 124. sp. 248.

Hab. Brazil.

This, the longest-known species of this genus, represents it
in the south-eastern part of South America. It is distin-
guished from al] the other species chiefly by its white under
tail-coverts. It is very common in Brazil, and apparently
migrates between Bahia and Rio de Janeiro.

PETASOPHORA DELPHINA.

Ornismya delphine, Less. Rev. Zool. 1839, p. 44.

Petasophora delphine, Gould, Mon. Troch. vol. iv. pl. 229;
id. Intr. Troch. (8vo ed.) p. 125. sp. 254.

Hab. Central America, Trinidad, Guiana, Venezuela, Co-
lumbia, Ecuador, and Peru.

This widely distributed species was first described by Lesson
(l.c.). It is remarkable among the members of this genus
by having its metallic colouring restricted to the throat and
ear-coverts, the rest of the plumage being devoid of brillianey,

On some recently discovered Calliste. 4.07

thus giving the impression that the bird is only in process of
assuming its full dress. It is among the commonest species
of this group, and, as will be noticed from the countries named
above, has a very extensive dispersion.

X L.—Description of a new Tanager of the Genus Calliste, and
Remarks on other recently discovered Species. By P. L.
SCLATER.

(Plate XII.)

Tue illustrated Monograph of the Genus Calliste, which I
published in 1858, contained figures and descriptions of fifty-
two species of this brilliant genus of Tanagers.

In the Catalogue of my American collection, published in
1862, forty-nine species only were given, five of those recog-
nized in the monograph being then unrepresented in the col-
lection, but two additional species being included, namely
C. albiventris (united m the monograph to C. brasiliensis) and
C’. cyanotis (discovered subsequently).

In 1868, in an article published in this journal, “on Recent
Additions to the Genus Calliste”*, I gave an account of the
discoveries in this group which had been made up to that
time since the issue of my monograph.

These were five in number, namely :—

1. Calliste cyanotis. 4. Calliste dowt.
2. lavinia. 5. hartlaubt.
3. franizi.

In 1868, in another article published in this journalt, I
gave a description and figure of Calliste cabanisi, mihi (= C.
sclateri, Cab. nec Lafr.), and remarked that this was the only
additional species I had met with since I had published the
previous article.

In our ‘Nomenclator Avium Neotropicalium,’ published
in 1873, Mr. Salvin and I acknowledged fifty-six species of
the genus Calliste, our Calliste florida, described in 1869,
having been added to the list. We have also lately charac-

* This, 1863, p. 450, + Ibis, 1868, p. 71.

408 Mr. P. L. Sclater on a new

terized three new species of this genus from Bolivia, namely.
C. punctulata, C. fulvicervix, and C. argyrofenges*, thus rais-
ing the number to fifty-nine. A skin of a new and sixtieth
species, which I propose to name, is now before me; and I
will take this opportunity of giving a few additional remarks
on some of the lately described members of the group.

In the ‘ Proceedings’ for 1858 (p. 294), I based a new
species of Calliste, under the name of C. cyanotis, on a skin
received through the MM. Verreaux, “from some part of
Peru bordering on Bolivia, or perhaps from within the con-
fines of that Republic.” In 1863, in the article in this journal
above referred to, I stated that I had received through the
same firm, from the Rio Napo, an example of what I believed
to be the same species in a more adult dress, and gave a
revised description of it accordingly. I have been able to
add nothing further to the history of this species until quite
recently, when, on examining Mr. Buckley’s last collection
of Bolivian birdst, Mr. Salvin and I found im the series a
single skin which seemed to belong toit. On comparing this
with the two previously described specimens of C. cyanotis in
my cabinet, it appeared at once that I had fallen into an
error. The individual obtained by Mr. Buckley was certainly
identical with the first example, obtained in 1858; while the
second so-called C. cyanotis, received in 18638, which I had
supposed to be a more adult specimen of the same species,
was decided, on reexamination and comparison, to be clearly
distinct. On this last-named individual, therefore, I propose
to base a new species, as follows :—

CALLISTE MELANOTIS, sp. nov. (Plate XIT. fig. 1.)

__ Calliste cyanotis, Sclater, Ibis, 1863, p. 451 (err.).

Nigra: superciliis latis et elongatis, dorso postico, campterio
alari et corpore subtus splendidé czerulescenti-viridibus ;
ventre medio et crisso cum subalaribus cervinis: alarum
tectricibus necnon rectricum remigumque marginibus
angustis cerulescentibus: rostro nigro, pedibus fuscis :
long. tota 5:0, ale 2°8, caudze 19, poll. et dec. angl.

* See paper on new Bolivian Birds, P. Z. S. 1876, p. 352.
+ See P. Z.8. 1876, p. 352.

emans i

}

J.G-Keu

and other Species of Calliste. 4.09

Had, in rep. Aquatoriali (reg. sylvatica orientali), ad ripas
fl. Napo. | |

Obs. A Calliste cyanoti (Pl. XII. fig. 2) superciliis latis et
elongatis, regione auriculari interscapulioque omnino nigris
et frontis vitta ceruled nulla diversa.

While the only known example of the present species is
from the Rio-Napo district of Western Ecuador, Calliste
cyanotis is, as we are now assured by the receipt of Mr.
Buckley’s specimen, a Bolivian species. Mr. Buckley ob-

_ tained it near Tilotilo, in the province of Yungas, along with

the other members of the genus which, as above mentioned,
Mr. Salvin and I have described as new from his collection.
Both C. melanotis and C. cyanotis are, in fact, southern re-
presentatives of Calliste labradorides of Columbia, with which,
however, they are by no means nearly identical. In the last-
named species the bright green of the lower back is con-
tinued up over the interscapulium, and the whole of the side
of the head is of the same shining green, connected with the
back by a posterior cervical band.

Having pointed out the characters which separate C. me-
lanotis from its allies, I will now say a few words on some of
the rarer species on which I have recently obtained more
complete information.

Of Calliste lavinia, originally described by Mr. Cassin from
a specimen obtained during the American Survey of the
Isthmus of Darien, several examples have lately been received
in this country. Messrs. Salvin and Godman’s collection
contains skins from Veragua (Arcé), Costa Rica (Van Patten),
and Chontales, in Nicaragua*. Amongst them is a female,
which is of a nearly uniform green, without any red on the
head or wings, but with a cyanescent tinge on the belly.
This was obtained by Arcé in Veragua. Mr. Thomas Belt
also procured several skins of this Tanager during his resi-
dence on the gold-fields of Chontales; and I am indebted to
him for the fine male specimen which is in my collection.

Calliste florida, described and figured by Mr. Salvin and
myself in the P. Z. S. for 1869 (p. 417, pl. XXVIll.), was

* Cf, Salvin, Ibis, 1872, p. 315.

410 Mr. H. E. Dresser’s Notes on

established on a single female specimen from Costa Rica.
Arcé has more recently forwarded a pair from Veragua, by
which we find that the male differs in having the nape and
lower back strongly overrun with golden yellow.

Of the rare Calliste hartlaubi (originally described by me
as a Daenis (!), cf. Ibis, 1863, p. 452), Messrs. Salvin and
Godman have lately obtained a single skin, of the ordinary
“ Bogota” make. They have likewise been so fortunate as
to secure a specimen of the Calliste cucullata of Swainson,
peculiar, as I believe, to Western Venezuela, of which modern
examples are very scarce. |

Lastly I may call attention to M. Dubois’s recently pub-
hshed memoir on the variability of certain species of Calliste*,
and remark that the question, as to what amount of difference
is sufficient to entitle a local form to specific rank, must
always remain an open one. With some of M. Dubois’s
unifications I should be disposed to concur; for instance, I
have already rejomed C. cyanescens to C. nigriviridis; but
I could not agree to consider such a well-marked form as C.
yeni the same as C. tatao, or to unite under one name C.
gyrola, C. gyroloides, and C. desmarestt.

XLI.—Notes on Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan’ (Turkes-
tanskie Jevotnie). By H. E. Dreusser.

[Continued from p. 880, and concluded. |

312. Macuetes puenax (L.) ; Severtzoff, p. 69.
Horizontal range. Occurs on passage in all four districts.
Vertical range. Occurs on passage in districts 1 and 2.

313. Trinea minuta, Leisl.; Severtzoff, p. 69.

Horizontal range. Occurs on passage in districts I., II.,
and III.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in districts 1 and 2.

* Remarques sur la variabilité de certaines espéces du genre Calliste,
par M. Alph. Dubois, conservateur au Musée royal @histoire naturelle de
Belgique. Bull, Acad. Roy. des Sci. Belgique, 2me sér. t. xxxviii. (1874)
p. 124.

Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan.’ | 41]

314, Trinca temMinckt, Leisl.; Severtzoff, p. 69.

Horizontal range. Occurs on passage in districts I., II.,
and III., and breeds on the lakes in the alpine regions of dis-
tricts [., Nae and IV.

Veal range. Occurs on passage in districts 1, 2, and 3,
and breeds in district 5

315. Trinea ALPINA, L.

Tringa variabilis, Severtzoff, p. 69.

Horizontal range. Occurs on passage in districts I., II.,
and ITI. |

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in districts 1 and 2.

316. Trinea suparquata (Gild.); Severtzoff, p. 69.

Horizontal range. Occurs on passage in districts I., II.,
and ITI.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in districts 1 and 2.

317. CaLipRIs ARENARIA (L.); Severtzoff, p. 69.
Horizontal range. Occurs on passage in district III.
Vertical range. Occurs on passage in district 1.

318. PHALAROPUS HYPERBOREUS (L.). _

Phalaropus angustirostris, Severtzoft, pp. 69.
Horizontal range. Occurs in districts II. and IIT.
Vertical range. Occurs on passage in districts 1 and 2.

319. Toranus HypoLrucus (L.); Severtzoff, p. 69.

Horizontal range. Breeds in all four districts. )

Vertical range. Occurs in summer and on passage in dis-
trict 1, is met with on passage and breeds rarely in district 2,
and breeds commonly in district 3.

320. Toranus CANESCENS (Gmel.).

Totanus glottis, Severtzoff, p. 69.

Horizontal range. Occurs on passage in all four districts,
and breeds in the first three.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in district 1, breeds and
is met with rarely in the winter in district 2.

321. Toranus ruscus (L.); Severtzoff, p. 69.
Horizontal range. Occurs on passage and breeds in dis-
trict LILI.

4.12 Mr. H. E. Dresser’s Notes on

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in district 1, and breeds
in district 2.

322. Toranus cauipRis (L.) ; Severtzoff, p. 69.

Horizontal range. Occurs on passage in all four districts,
and breeds rarely in district I.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in districts 1 and 2, and
breeds rarely in the latter.

323. Totanus staGNnatiLis, Bechst.; Severtzoff, p. 69.
Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I., II., and III.
Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1 and 2.

324. Totanus ocuropus (L.); Severtzoff, p. 69.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I., I1., and III., and
occurs rarely in the winter in districts III. and IV.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in district 1, breeds and
occurs rarely in winter in district 2.

825. ToTanus GLAREOLA (L.); Severtzoff, p. 69.
Horizontal range. Breeds in districts II. and III., and pos-

sibly both breeds and occurs on passage in district IV.
Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1 and 2.

326. Limosa acocrPHata (L.).
Limosa melanura, Severtzoff, p. 69.
Horizontal range. Occurs on passage in district ITI.
‘ Vertical range. Breeds rarely in district 1, and occurs rarely
in winter and on passage in district 2.

327. NuMENIus arquatus (L.); Severtzoff, p. 69.

Horizontal range. Occurs rarely on passage in districts II.
and III.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in districts 1 and 2.

3828. Raxuus aquaticus, L.; Severtzoff, p. 69.

Horizontal range. Is resident and occurs on passage in dis-
tricts II. and III.

Vertical range. Occurs rarely on passage in district 1, and
is resident and common in district 2.

Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan.’ — 418

3829, Crex PRATENSIS, Bechst.; Severtzoff, p. 69.

Horizontal range. Breeds and occurs on passage in districts
II., III. and IV.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in district 2, and breeds
in districts 2 and 3.

330. PorzaANa MINUTA (Pall.).

Gallinula pusilla, Severtzoff, p. 69.

Horizontal range. Occurs on passage and breeds in districts
II., III., and IV.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in districts 1 and 2, and
breeds in districts 1, 2, and 8, commonly in the second.

331. PorzANA BAILLONII.

Gallinula pygmea, Severtzoff, p. 69.

Horizontal range. Occurs on passage and breeds in districts
IT. and ITI.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage and breeds in districts
1 and 2.

332. Porzana MARUETTA (Leach).

Gallinula porzana, Severtzoff, p. 69.

Horizontal range. Breeds rarely in districts II. and III.
Vertical range. Breeds rarely in district 2.

333. GALLINULA cHLOROPUS (L.); Severtzoff, p. 69.

Horizontal range. Breeds rarely in districts II., III., and
IV.

Vertical range. Breeds rarely in district 2

Dr. Severtzoff inserts with a query a Porphyrio, without
surmising which species it can be.

334. Funica atra, L.; Severtzoff, p. 69.
Horizontal range. Breeds in all four districts.
Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1, 2, and 3.

335. Popicers Minor (Gm.); Severtzoff, p. 69.

Horizontal range. In the original notes it is stated that it
occurs in winter in district III.; but in a MS. noté this
is altered, and it is stated that it is resident in districts I.
and IT.

414 Mr. H. E. Dresser’s Notes on

Vertical range. It is stated in the original that it occurs in
winter in district 2; but this is altered in MS., and it is stated
to be resident.

336. PoDICEPS NIGRICOLLIS, Sundev.

Podiceps auritus, Severtzoff, p. 69.

Horizontal range. Is rare on passage in districts II. and III.
Vertical range. Occurs on passage in districts ] and 2.

337. Popicyps auritus (L.).

Podiceps cornutus, Severtzoff, p. 69.

Horizontal and Vertical ranges. Same as the preceding
species; but it is said to breed on Lake Son-kul.

338. PopicEPs GRISEGENA (Bodd.).

Podiceps rubricollis, Severtzoff, p. 69.

Horizontal range. Occurs rarely on passage in districts L.,
II., and III.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage and possibly breeds in
districts 1 and 2, but certainly breeds in district 5.

339. Popicrps cristatus (L.); Severtzoff, p. 70.

Horizontal range. Occurs rarely on passage in districts I.
and ITI.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage and possibly breeds in
districts 1 and 2.

340. PeLEcaNus onocrotatus, L. ; Severtzoff, p. 70.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I., I., and III.

Vertical range. Breeds in district 1, and occurs rarely in
summer in district 2.

341. PHatacRocorax CARBO (L.).

Carbo phalacrocorax, var. continentalis, Severtzoff, p. 70.

Horizonial range. Breeds in districts I., I1., and III., and
occurs on passage in district IV.

Vertical range. Breeds and occurs rarely in winter in dis-
trict 1, and breeds and is found on passage in district 2.

342. PHaLacrocorax PYGM#us (Pall.).

Carbo pygmeus, Severtzoff, p. 70.

Horizontal range. Breeds rarely in district III.
Vertical range. Breeds rarely in district 1.

Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan? 415

343. Larus canus, L.; Severtzoff, p. 70. °
Horizontal range. Occurs on passage in district III.
Vertical range. Occurs on passage in district 1.

344. Larus cacuinnans, Pall.; Severtzoff, Diaue
Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I., []., and III.
Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1 and 3.

345. ? Larus teucopHaus, Licht.

Larus argentatus, Severtzoff, p. 70.

Horizontal range. Occurs on passage in district IIT.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in district 1.

In a MS. note Dr. Severtzoff informs me that he believes
this species to be true L. leucopheus.

346. Larus ICHTHYAETUS, Pall.

Gavia ichthyaétos, Severtzoff, p. 70.
Horizontal range. Breeds in district ILI.
Vertical range. Breeds in district 1.

347. Larus ripipunpbvs, L.

Gavia ridibunda, Severtzoff, p. 70.
Horizontal range. Breeds in ali four districts.
Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1 and 2.

348. Larus minutus, Pall.

Gavia minuta, Severtzoff, p. 70.

Horizontal range. Occurs in summer in district ILI.

Vertical range. Occurs in summer and possibly nests in
district 1. ,

349. Srerna casPiA, Pall.; Severtzoff, p. 70.
Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I., II., and ITT.
Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1 and 2.

350. Srerna anextica, Mont.; Severtzoff, p. 70.
Horizontal range. Breeds in all four districts.
Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1, 2, and 3.

851. Srerna FLuviatiuis, Naum.

Sterna hirundo, Severtzoff, p. 70.

Horizontal and Vertical ranges. Asin the preceding species,
except that in the latter it does not breed in district 3.

A16 Mr. H. E. Dresser’s Notes on

852. Srerna minuTA, L.; Severtzoff, p. 70.
Horizontal range. Breeds in districts II. and IV.
Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1 and 2.

353. HyprocHetipon nieRra (L.).

Hydrochelidon niger, Severtzoff, p. 70.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I., II., and III.
Vertical range. Breeds in district 1.

354. HypROCHELIDON HYBRIDA (Pall.).
Hydrochelidon leucopareius, Severtzofi, p. 70.
Horizontal range. Breeds in district ILI.
Vertical range. Breeds in district 1.

355. Cyanus oLor (Gm.), Severtzoff, p. 70.
Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I. and ILI.
Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1 and 3.

356. Cyenus musicus, Bechst. ; Severtzoff, p. 70.

Horizontal range. Occurs on passage and in winter in dis-
tricts I., I]., I1I.; breeds early in district III.

Vertical rauge. Occurs in winter and on passage in districts
1, 2, and 3.

357. Cyanus attum1, Homeyer; Severtzoff, p. 70.

Horizontal range. Occurs on passage and in winter in dis-
tricts I., II., and III., everywhere rare.

Vertical range. Occurs rarely on passage in district 1, and
rarely also in winter in districts 2 and 3. |

358. ANSER MIDDENDORFFI, Severtzoff, pp. 70, 149.

Horizontal range. Occurs on passage in districts I. and IT.,
and winters in district III. ;

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in districts 1, 2, and 8,
and winters in district 2.

At page 149 Dr. Severtzoff writes as follows :—“ Anser
middendorffi, nob. 'This Goose, which Middendorff discovered
in North-eastern Siberia, was described by him under the
name of Anser grandis, Pall.; but I have renamed it, as Mid-
dendorfi’s specimens agree precisely with mine from Tur-
xestan, and are specifically distinct from Anser grandis of

Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan? 417

Pallas, not agreeing, except as regards the large size, as
pointed out to me by Brandt, who considered Pallas’s Anser
grandis to be nothing but a large form of Anser cygnoides.
It is true that A. grandis, Pall., resembles Anser cygnoides,
much as dA. grandis, Midd. (A. middendorffi, nob.), does
Anser segetum. The two latter differ as follows :—A. mid-
dendorffi is larger, has an orange band on the black mandi-
ble; and its head is redder, being reddish brown, and not
greyish brown, as in A. segetum; and even this last charac-
teristic is not constant, as is to be seen from Von Schrenck’s
Amoor specimens. Males of A. middendorff from the Amoor
measure—total length 33” 5!-34!' 4!" extent 64!—64!! 7!"",
culmen 1” 9!-2", weight 10-103 lb. It is therefore larger
than Anser cinereus, which measures 334" in length, 624" in
extent, and weighs 9 lb. A. middendorffi occurs in flocks
of thousands on the Aris river and its tributaries, on the
Keless and Chirchick ; towards the north-east of the Aris it
occurs on passage. But in 1867 and 1868 it was not so nu-
merous as usual on the above-named rivers, and was met with
more numerously on the unfrozen lakes in the vicinity, where
food was more abundant throughout the winter. In these
flocks were also individuals of Anser segetum and of another
species, which was, I believe, Anser obscurus, Brehm, a small
form of Anser segetum; but these birds were more wary than
A. middendorffi, and I could not obtain a specimen. I also
occasionally saw small flocks of A. albifrons. It is curious
how the Geese may be classified into small divisions of forms
which approach each other in appearance, some already con-
stituting distinct species, whereas others are yet in the pro-
cess of separation, differing only by some trifling but constant
difference in size, colour, or form of beak. They may be
arranged as follows :—

1. Anser grandis, Anser cygnoides.

2. Anser middendorffi, A. segetum, A.. arvensis, A. obscu-
rus, Brehm., &c.

3. Anser cinereus, A. albifrons, A. medius, A. minutus, and
A. cineraceus, Brehm.

4. Cygnopsis canadensis, Bernicla leucopsis.

——

|
:
| |
a i}
i :
q pie.
H ;
hike
ah t
| q
{
| bre
Bett
rire
:
fl :
rh 4
|
|
| bia
‘| {
4 a
ie i
a riz
Mt BIA
oii |
af +i
i
q
hl
) |
}

S= =

418 Mr. H. E. Dresser’s Notes on

All the above species are certainly descended from four
different parent forms, and have spread into the localities in-
habited by the four following species, viz. Anser skornia-
kovi (A. indicus), Bernicla picta, Bernicla ruficollis, and Ber-
nicla torquata, which do not subdivide ito different forms ;
but the former groups are still undergoing the struggle for
existence, the balance being on the side of A. segetum and A.
albifrons. I also observed that when on migration in the
Ural, A. albifrons and A. minutus existed together very well,
but A. medius, the intermediate form between these two
Species, was not so numerous. All these facts are proofs in
favour of the Darwinian theory, of which the Geese give many
interesting illustrations.”

359. ANSER SEGETUM (Gm.); Severtzoff, p. 70.

Horizontal range. Occurs on passage in districts I., I., and
III., and winters in the last.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in districts 1 and 2, and

winters in district 2.

360. ANSER oBscuRUS, Brehm; Severtzoff, p. 70.
Horizontal range. Is rare in winter in district III.
Vertical range. Occurs in winter in district 2.

361. ANSER CINEREUS, Meyer; Severtzoff, p. 70.

Horizontal range. Breeds in all four districts, and winters
in district ITI.

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1, 2, 8, and 4, and win-
ters in district 2.

362. ANSER ALBIFRONS, Bechst.; Severtzoff, p. 70.

Horizontal range. Occurs rarely on passage and in winter in
district ITI.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in district 1, and rarely
in winter in district 2.

363. ANsER cyenorpEs (L.); Severtzoff, p. 70.
Horizontal range. Possibly breeds in district I.
Vertical range. Possibly breeds in district 2. .

364, BernicLa RUFICOLLIS (Pall.).
Anser ruficollis, Severtzoff, p. 70.

Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan.’ 419

Horizontal range. Occurs rarely on passage in district ITI.
Vertical range. Occurs rarely on passage in district 1.

365. ANSER INDIcUS (Lath.).

Anser skorniakovi, Severtzoff, pp. 70, 149.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I. and IT.

Vertical range. Breeds in district 5.

At page 149 Dr. Severtzoff describes this as a new species ;
but I do not reproduce his description, as he informs me that
he is now convinced that it really is nothing but A. indicus.

366. TaporNA RUTILA (Pall.).

Anas rutila, Severtzoff, p. 70.

Horizontal range. Breeds in all four districts.
Vertical range. Breeds in all five districts.

367. TapoRNA corNnutTa (Gm.).

Anas tadorna, Severtzoff, p. 70.

Horizontal range. Breeds in all four districts.

Vertical range. Breeds in district 1, and occurs on passage
in district 2.

368. Anas BoscHas, L.; Severtzoff, p. 70.
Horizontal range. Winters in all four districts, and breeds
in districts I., II., and III., and possibly in IV.
Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1, 2, and 3, and winters
in districts 1 and 2.

369. CHAULELASMUS STREPERUS (L.).

Anas strepera, Severtzoff, p. 70.

Horizontal range. Breeds in district III., and occurs on
passage in district IV.

Vertical range. Breeds and occurs rarely in winter in dis-
tricts 1 and 2.

370. QuERQUEDULA ciIRCIA (L.).

Anas querquedula, Severtzoff, p. 70.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I., II., and III.
Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1 and 2.

371. QuERQuEDULA CREcCA (L.).
Anas crecca, Severtzoff, p. 70.
SER. I1I.—VOL. VI. 2G

420 Mr. H. E. Dresser’s Notes on

Horizontal range. Occurs on passage in all four districts,
breeds in I., II., and III., and winters in district IV.

Vertical range. Breeds in districts 1, 2, and 3, and occurs
on passage in districts 1 and 2.

372, Sparuta ciyPzAta (L.).

Anas clypeata, Severtzoff, p. 70.

Horizontal range. Occurs on passage and breeds in districts
I., I., and ITI.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in districts 1 and 2, and
breeds in district 1, 2, and 38.

373. Marca PENELOPE (L.).

Anas penelope, Severtzoff, p. 70.

Horizontal range. Occurs on passage in district I., I1., and
III., and in winter in district IV.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in districts 1 and 2.

374, Darina acuta (L.).

Anus acuta, Severtzoff, p. 70.

Horizontal range. Occurs on passage in districts I., [I1., and
III., winters in districts III. and IV., and possibly breeds in
district IV.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in districts 1, 2, and 8,
and winters in district 2.

875, CGipremra Fusca (L.). -

Fuligula fusca, Severtzoff, p. 70.

‘Horizontal range. Occurs on passage and in winter in dis-
trict III.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage and in winter in district 1.

376. Giprmia cristata (L.).

Fuligula cristata, Severtzoff, p. 70.

Horizontal range. Occurs on passage in ali four districts,
and in winter in districts III. and IV.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in districts 1 and 2, and
in winter in district 2.

377. FuLicuLta rerina (L.); Severtzoff, p. 70.
Horizontal range. Occurs on passage in districts I., I.,
and IIT., and in winter in districts III. and IV.

Severtzoff’s ‘Fauna of Turkestan, 421

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in districts 1, 2,3, and
4, rarely in the two last, and in winter in district 2.

378. FuLicuLa RuFINA (Pall.) ; Severtzoff, p. 70.

Horizontal range. Breeds in all four districts, and is resident
in district IV.

Vertical range. Breeds in district 1, and is found on pas-
sage in district 2.

379. NyROcA FERRUGINEA (Gm.).

Fuligula leucophthalma, Severtzoff, p. 70.

Horizontal range. Breeds in districts I., II., and ITI.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in districts 1 and 2, and
breeds rarely in the latter.

380. CLANGULA GLAUCION (L.) ; Severtzoff, p. 70.

Horizontal range. Occurs in winter and on passage in dis-
tricts I., II., and III.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in districts 1 and 3, and
in winter in districts 1 and 2.

381. ERIsMATURA LEUCOCEPHALA (Scop.).

Fuligula mersa, Severtzoff, p. 70.

Horizontal range. Breeds and occurs on passage in districts
1 ity and TIT:

Vertical range. Breeds in district 1, and occurs rarely on
passage in district 2.

382. Merrcus MERGANSER, L.; Severtzoff, p. 70.

Horizontal range. Occurs in winter in all four districts,
breeds in districts J. and II., and on passage in I., II., and
ITI.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in district 1, i winter
in district 2, and breeds in districts 3 and 4.

383. Merecus aLBELLvs, L.; Severtzoff, p. 70.

Horizontal range. Occurs in winter in districts I., I., and
III.

Vertical range. Occurs on passage in district 1, and in

winter in districts 1 and 2.
242

422 Mr. T. Ayres on Birds observed

384. Pua@nicopTervs roseEus, Pall.; Severtzoff, p. 70.

Horizontal range. Occurs as a straggler on passage in dis-
tricts III. and IV. |

Vertical range. Occurs on passage as astraggler in districts
1 and 2.

XLII.— Notes on Birds collected and observed in the Lyden-
burg District of the Republic of Transvaal. By THomas
Ayres. (Communicated by J. H. Gurney.)

Tue portion of the Drakenbergen where I collected the under-
mentioned birds is in lat. 25° S. and long. 31° E., or there-
abouts, and is that part of Transvaal known as the Lyden-
burg Gold-fields. It is on the eastern slope of the mountains,
amongst very romantic scenery, precipices and ravines abound-
ing, the latter often well wooded with timber and scrub. Clear
crystal streams are found running in all directions, the alti-
tude of the country being about 6000 to 8000 feet. The prin-

cipal rocks are limestones, sandstones, shales, and trap. The

climate is decidedly wet and ungenial, which is chiefly to be
attributed to the mountains being so frequently enveloped in
misty clouds, causing the climate to be raw and damp in com-

parison with most other parts of South Africa.

This part of the Transvaal is exceedingly rich in ferns and
orchids, which are well suited by the climate and soil; and
many of the shady ravines are made lovely by the feathery
foliage of the ferns ; one cannot, however, help being disap-
pointed at the paucity of birds and insects, though the ento-
mologist may nevertheless get many a prize not to be found
in other and warmer parts of the country.

1*, ACCIPITER RUFIVENTRIS, Smith. African Rufous-
breasted Hawk. ;

Male adult. Iris bright golden yellow; bill blue, dusky at
base ; cere and eyelids greenish yellow; tarsi and feet light
yellow.

* [The species numbered are those which were included in the collec-
tion made and sent to me by Mr. Ayres.—J. H. G.] 7

in the Lydenburg District of Transvaal. 4.23

The only bird of prey sent in the collection ; the Raptores
are but poorly represented at the Gold-fields. I, however,
observed there during my stay of a year and a half the fol-
lowing species, though many of them I saw but seldom, and
some only once :—Neophron percnopterus, Vultur occipitalis,
Otogyps auricularis, Gyps kolbi, Gypaétus meridionalis, Buteo
jokal, Helotarsus ecaudatus, Serpentarius secretarius, Falco
biarmicus*, Tinnunculus ruficollis, Milvus parasiticus, Elanus
ceruleus, and, I believe, also Accipiter melanoleucus. There
were two or three species of Owls that frequented the pre-
cipices and woods; but I did not succeed in shooting any of
them.

2. CAPRIMULGUsS EUROPEUS, Linn. European Goatsucker.

A few of these Goatsuckers made their appearance about
our shanties during the summer months, having the noiseless
habits of the genus, hiding away amongst the bushes during
the day, and showing themselves just in the gloaming.

[Mr. R. B. Sharpe, to whose kinduess I am indebted for
examining several of the birds sent by Mr. Ayres, identifies
this specimen with C. europeus, to which species he also refers
C. smithi of Bonaparte.

The present specimen is paler-coloured than ordinary British
examples, and, though a male, is destitute of white patches on
the tail and wings; from which, and from the remarks re-
specting other South-African specimens in the first edition
of Mr. Layard’s work (p. 47), I infer that the young males
of C. europeus must, during the first year, be destitute of
these white patches, and also that probably the young birds
of both sexes assume a paler hue than the normal tint of
British specimens during their first southern migration.

For further information bearing upon this subject, I would
refer to Mr. Dresser’s article on C. ewropeus in his ‘ Birds of

* [In a subsequent communication from Potchefstroom Mr, Ayres gives
the following anecdote of a Falcon of this species :—“ A friend of mine
saw one come down with great velocity, whilst he was out shooting, and
clutch a Snipe at which his dog pointed, and which rose at the moment.
The Falcon was shot at once by my friend ; and the Snipe, strange to say,
flew away, apparently unhurt.”—J. H. G.]

42 th “Mr. T. Ayres on Birds observed

Europe,’ and to Mr. Sharpe’s remarks in the second edition
of Layard’s ‘ Birds of South Africa,’ p. 83.

Mr. Ayres notes that the present specimen was shot at
Macamac on January 10, that it was a male, iris dusky hazel,
bill, tarsi, and feet dusky, total length 10 inches, bill 14%,
tarsus 1}, wing 7, tail 5.—J. H. G.].

3. CAPRIMULGUS RUFIGENA, Smith. Rufous-cheeked Goat-
sucker.

The specimen sent was the only one I came across; my dog
flushed it on January 18 from a small clump of bush on the
banks of the small river near the town of Lydenburg ; it was
a male, iris dark hazel, bill dusky, but black at the tip, tarsi
and feet dusky pale, eyelids dull chrome-yellow.

4. Hirunpo rustica, Linn. Chimney-Swallow.

These Swallows appeared in fair numbers amongst the
mountains during the summer months, and very probably
bred amongst the rocks.

[The specimen sent is an adult male in moult, killed De-
cember 31; the breast and abdomen have already assumed the
vinous tinge, though not in its fullest intensity —J. H. G.]

5. Hirunpo atsicuna, Bonap. White-throated Swallow.
This Swallow also put in a fair appearance ; they were most
frequently to be seen hawking along the streams.

6. CoryLe ruLtievLa (Licht.). Brown Martin.

Though I have seen this Martin in other parts of Transvaal,
I shot specimens for the first time on the Gold-fields. They
came in the autumn and winter months, but were not in such
numbers as the two preceding species.

7. CoryLe cincta (Bodd.). Brown-collared Martin.

This species was tolerably common during the summer
months about Lydenburg, and was evidently breeding along
the banks of the river; I also observed it on the immediate
Gold-fields, but not so plentifully.

I likewise noticed Cypselus melba, Cypselus apus, Cypselus
cafer, Hirundo cucullauta, Atticora holomelas, and Cotyle pa-
lustris ; Coracias garrula was also sparingly distributed ;

in the Lydenburg District of Transvaal. 4209

amongst the Kingfishers only two species were noticeable,
Corythornis cyanostigma and, I think, Alcedo semitorquata ;
Promerops gurneyi is tolerably common, feeding on the nectar
of the flowers of a scrubby tree common on the sides and sum-
mits of the mountains.

8. CINNYRIS CHALYBEA (Linn.). Lesser Double-collared
Sun-bird.

Plentiful in the spring and early autumn, when they con-
gregate on the blossoming trees and shrubs; they are aiso
found in winter, but not commonly.

9. Necrarrnra FAmosa (Linn.). Malachite Sun-bird.

This lovely bird is still more common than the preceding,
frequenting the same localities, but is more especially to be
found about the sugar-bushes with Promerops gurneyi.

Besides these sugar-birds, I also noticed Cinnyris afra and
C. amethystina.

10. Dryma@ca uyroxantHa, Sharpe. Yellow-breasted
Drymeeca.

Not uncommon amongst the jungle which abounds on the
slope of the mountains. Iris hght hazel; bill black, the
under mandible in some specimens pale lilac at the base ;
tarsi and feet pale.

[Mr. Sharpe informs me that this is a new species, which
he is about to describe under the above name, from a Natal
specimen, in the ensuing part of the second edition of Layard’s
catalogue.—J. H. G.]

11. Dryma@ca LevAiLLAnti,Smith. Levaillant’s Drymeeca.
This is the commonest of the Warblers in this locality, and
very generally distributed.

12. Dryma@ca cuintana, Smith. Kurichane Drymeca.
This species is to be found in the same localities as the
preceding, and is also generally distributed.

18. Spuena@acus arricanus (Gmel.). Flute-voiced Sphe-
noeacus.

Common, but, on account of its retiring habits, not often
seen.

426 Mr. T. Ayres on Birds observed

14, BRapyprerus BARRATTI, Sharpe. Barratt’s Reed-
Warbler.

This species frequents the dense bush and jungle fringing |
the mountain-streamlets, and, though by no means uncom-
mon, is not often seen.

Male. Iris dusky brown ; bill black; tarsi and feet dusky.

Female. Iris hazel; bill dusky horn-colour, the under man-
dible ash-colour ; tarsi and feet dusky pale.

15. ZosteRors virENs (Sundev.). Green Zosterops.

This bird is exceedingly plentiful, both in the forest of
the Kloofs and amongst the jungle on the slopes. It builds a ©
neat open cup-shaped nest in some low shrub; the eggs are
white and, as far as I’can remember, without spots.

16. AnTHUsS caPENsIS (Linn.). Sentinel Pipit.

This is the commonest and most regularly distributed of _
all the Pipits, and is as plentiful at the Gold-fields as in all
other parts of Transvaal.

17. AnrHus PpyrRRHoNOoTUS (Vieill.). Cinnamon-backed
Pipit.

This species is common about Lydenburg, where it fre-
quents the open grassy plains.

18. Turpvus oxivacevs, Linn. Olivaceous Thrush.

These Thrushes inhabit the dense forest, and are most easily
obtained in the dusk of the evening, when they appear to be
more on the move than at other times, chasing one another
about, and often uttering their short clucking note. They
feed on the ground amongst the dead leaves, insects forming
their principal diet.

19. Turpus curneryi, Hartl. Gurney’s Thrush.

This Thrush is exceedingly scarce. It frequents the same
localities as the preceding species; but of its habits I know
nothing. ‘The specimen sent was quietly hunting for insects
on the ground ; and being amongst the underwood, I did not
know what it was till I picked it up. It proved to bea male;
total length 8} inches, tarsus 14, bill 14, wing 44, tail 38;
iris dusky hazel, tarsi and feet flesh-colour.

in the Lydenburg District of Transvaal. 427

[This specimen, which is only the second that I have seen,
has been added to the collection at the British Museum ; it

agrees closely with the type figured in ‘ The Ibis’ for 1864,
pl. ix.—J. H. G.]

20. Prrrocincta RupEsTRIS (Vielll.). South-African
Rock-Thrush.

These birds were scarce at the Gold-fields, though a few
were scattered about in our locality ; they are fond of climb-
ing low rocks and stones on the slopes of the mountains, and

are pretty conspicuous on the tops of the stones, though very
shy.

21. CossypHa BicoLor(Sparrm.). Vociferous Chat Thrush.

Exceedingly scarce in the Lydenburg forests; I only saw
two or three during my stay. They seem to prefer the skirts

of the woods and bushy places to the more timbered parts.

22. ANDROPADUS FLAVOSTRIATUS, Sharpe. Yellow-streaked
Bulbul.

These Bulbuls are to be found, nearly always, in small com-
panies, making much noise amongst the dry leaves on the
ground as they hustle them about in search of food. On the
approach of an intruder they make an incessant chattering,
which immediately attracts attention; and were it not for
this habit, they would not often be noticed in the dense bush,
which they are fond of frequenting.

The woods would often be utterly silent but for the noisi-
ness of these little fellows.

Male. Total length 82 inches, tarsus 17, bill 1, wing 33,
tail 38, iris hazel, bill black, tarsi and feet ashy.

Female. Total length 72 inches, tarsus 1, bill $, wing 38,
tail 8; iris tawny, bill dusky, tarsi and feet ashy.

23. ANDROPADUS IMPoRTUNUS (Vieill.). Sombre Bulbul.

A very silent bird, moving quietly about amongst the tops
of low trees and bushes, and feeding much on fruits; oc-
casionally they utter one loud call. I seldom saw more
than two together; but they are tolerably common, frequent-
ing the wooded kloofs.

4.28 Mr. T. Ayres on Birds observed —

Male. Iris tawny, bill black, tarsi and feet dusky.

[The colour of the iris in this species would seem to be
somewhat variable: in ‘The Ibis’ for 1862, at page 29, Mr.
Ayres recorded specimens from Natal in which it was “ very
pale green ;” and Mr. Layard, in the first edition of his Cata-

logue, p. 187, speaks of it as “ very pale yellow,” whilst Le-
vaillant describes it as “ brun foncé ;’ Andersson, who ob-
tained it at the Knysna, records one specimen as having the
iris “ white,” and one “ yellowish white.”—J. H. G.]

24. Pycnonotus nigricans (Vieill.). Brounoir Bulbul.

This widely distributed species was most common in the
spring, when some particular trees were in full blossem ; they
were constantly feeding on the nectar together with the
Sugar-birds.

25. Liopritus NieRicaPILuus (Vieill.). Bush Blackcap.
Decidedly scarce, and I cannot remember ever having seen
more than a pair together. They are fruit-eating birds, and
are mostly seen amongst the upper branches of the trees and
bushes.
Female. Iris dark lake-red ; bill pinkish flesh-colour ; tarsi
_ and feet flesh-colour.

26. PoGonocicHLA STELLATA (Vieill.). White-starred Fly-
catcher.

These birds seem to appear in the spring and summer
months, when they become tolerably plentiful, frequenting
the thick forest ; they are solitary, or at most in pairs, and
in habits much resemble our Robin*.

Iris dusky ; bill black ; tarsi and feet dusky pale. :

[Judging from the specimens sent by Mr. Ayres, it would
seem that the female only differs from the male in wanting
the white starry spots on the throat and in front of the eye.
—J. H. G.]

27. CHLOROPETA NATALENSIS (Smith). Natal Flycatcher.
This species much resembles in its habits many of the

* {Limagine Cossypha caffra to be the bird referred to under the title
of “ Robin,” vide Layard’s Cat. Ist edition, p. 182,—J. H. G.]

in the Lydenburg District of Transvaal. 429

Warblers, frequenting the same localities—thick jungle and
low bush on the slopes of mountains.

These birds generally keep themselves concealed, but less
so towards evening, or in wet weather, or after a heavy shower ;
the cock bird at such times often perches on some high twig,
singing a short song which reminded me much of the song
of the Chaffinch, that seemed to say ‘‘Is’nt it a pretty thing
to be a soldier ;” this is repeated over and over.

It is not an uncommon species ; but the hen bird is compa-
ratively seldom seen.

Male. Iris hazel ; bill dusky, under mandible yellow ; tarsi
and feet dusky.

[It seems to me that the late Sir A. Smith was justified in
considering Chloropeta natalensis to be a Flycatcher (see his
article on this species in the ‘ Illustrations of the Zoology of
South Africa’), though it bears a considerable resemblance
to some of the Warblers, amongst which it has been placed by
more than one subsequent writer.—J. H. G.|

28. PINDALUS RUFICAPILLUS, Hartl. Yellow-throated Fly-
catcher.

Found sparingly in the dense forest, generally solitary or
in pairs, and mostly flitting about the thickest foliage of the
trees.

They are exceedingly restless birds, seldom still for a second,
and never appear to be able to get enough food, which no
doubt consists of very small and delicate insects.

Tris dusky; bill, upper mandible dusky, under* mandible
yellow ; tarsi and feet greenish dusky.

29. Fiscus cotuaris (Linn.). Fiskal Shrike.

This Shrike is about as plentiful in the Lydenburg district
as in most other parts of the country; a single one or a pair
may often be seen frequenting some particular portion of
ground. Iris dusky, tarsi and feet dusky.

* [In ‘ The Ibis,’ 1862, p. 152, the “ upper” mandible is said to be yel-
low, which appears to be an accidental error.—J. H. G.]

430 Mr. T. Ayres on Birds observed

30. EnnEoctTonus coLzaARis (Linn.). Red-backed Shrike.

This species is scarce at the Gold-fields; it is solitary in
its habits, sitting stationary on the top of some low bush.

[The specimen sent is a male in immature plumage, shot
December 17.—J. H. G.]

31. Dryoscorus Boutsout (Lath.). Boulboul Shrike.

I think these Shrikes are always in pairs. They are not
at all uncommon, though seldom seen, as they frequent the
densest jungle and are retiring in their habits; their call,
however, is often heard.

32. LANIARIUS RUBIGINOSUS, Sund. Olivaceous Shrike.

No doubt these Bush-Shrikes are amongst the mountains
all the year round; but they are particularly sly and difficult
to see, especially during the breeding-season, when they make
the woods joyous with their varied songs and calls. Many of
their notes are very liquid, and remind me much of those of
the Nightingale. Often have I been very close to one of these
songsters, and, though his song was pretty constant and he
was frequently moving from bush to bush, I could do no
more than catch a glimpse of him now and then, so skilfully
did he conceal himself. During the winter they are silent.

Male adult. Iris bright hazel; bill black; tarsi and feet
bluish ash-colour.

Female adult. Iris reddish hazel; bill black, but under
mandible ashy at base; tarsi and feet bluish ash-colour.

Female immature. Iris dark hazel; bill pale ash-colour, —
dusky at the tip; tarsi and feet bluish ash-colour.

[The description of this Shrike given by Mr. Layard at
p. 164 of the first edition of the ‘ Birds of South Africa’
appears to apply to the adult male only ; the adult female
sent by Mr. Ayres agrees with Levaillant’s figure of that sex
(pl. 76. fig. 1), except that it wants the blackish spots on the
head, though the ear-coverts are a darker grey than the crown
of the head. In another and, apparently, younger female the
buff tint on the breast is wanting, and the breast and flanks
are yellowish green, freckled with small transverse markings

in the Lydenburg District of Transvaal. 431

of dark olive-green, the throat, centre of the lower breast,
abdomen, and under tail-coverts being white.

I have recently seen, for the first time, a specimen of this
Shrike obtained in Natal.—J. H. G.]

33. HyPHantorNis ocuLaris (Smith). Black-lored Wea-
verbird.

I only met with these birds once; this was in the middle of
winter ; there were two or three together, moving about and
apparently feeding amongst some thick bushes in the
forest.

Female. Iris pale ashy yellow; tarsi and feet pale ashy.
Contents of stomach small beetles and other insects.

[Conf. Ibis, 1862, p. 37.—J. H. G.]

34. Laconosticta RuBRicATA (Licht.). Ruddy Finch.

This species is often to be seen about the jungle on the
outskirts of the woods, where it attracts attention by its pe-
culiar though not loud note.

It is most frequently in pairs, though three or four are
often to be found together.

35. CritHacRa scoTops, Sundev. Black-faced Grosbeak.

Pretty generally distributed amongst the woods and bushes,
but seems to prefer the forests, where it feeds amongst the
foliage of the trees.

Male. Iris dusky ; bill dusky, but the under mandible pale ;
tarsi and feet dusky.

36. CriTHAGRA CANICOLLIS (Swains.). Grey-necked Gros-
beak, or Cape-Canary.

This species appears to prefer the more open slopes of the
hills. It is often seen in small companies.

Female. Iris dusky ; tarsi and feet dusky ; bill dusky, but
pale at the tip.

37. CritHaGRA suLPHURATA (Linn.). Sulphureous Gros-
beak.

This bird I found in the woods in the ravines of the moun-
tains, often busy feeding about the upper twigs and foliage
of the trees and shrubs.

:
{
‘
aa)
a
Bw
7
ah
Wi }
ie, ‘
ta as
ag al
i} Be
ee a
ie i
'
+ ‘3
eH
: im iad
' {" 1
} i" ig
a .
| i:
i i \)
i
; 1 (a ie!
Ao
: 1} u
whe)
; |
We 1
te | |
hu |
: i
ta
4]
i
ane |
: 1
Sein:
} ne
Woy
\
1 He | |
q if We WH
i ya
) |
- 1 q
4 | "
i raed
|
} ar
\ aut!
i 4)
i Lie
“ye bud
! \ i4@
Be hind
7 4
4 ; {
' | \
i{ hind
|
1 14
. } \
\
{ : i 4
} i ;
i , ak
Hii )

— — - — —- -
—— a z

SS SSS ee
=

432 Mr. T. Ayres on Birds observed

Female. Total length 64 inches, bill +%, tarsus $, wing 3,4,
tail 24.

[The specimen sent appears to be the ordinary Cape form,
and not the smaller race which occurs in Natal (conf. Ibis,
1869, p. 295).—J. H. G.]

38. MrIraFRa AFRICANA, Smith (=planicola, Licht.). Plain-
loving Lark.

Sparsely distributed in the Lydenburg district, where it is
found singly or in pairs, frequenting the open grassy
country.

39. CoryTHAIx mMuUSOPHAGA (Dub.). White-crested Plan-
tain-eater.

These birds are common in all the forests of the mountains
on the eastern slope; they are frequently so noisy that one
cannot help finding them, but at other times so silent and
quiet that I have often sat for an hour under a densely fo-
liaged tree without being aware that they were close above
me, till my attention was at last attracted by a small berry
or two falling from the tree, or perhaps by the slightest rustle
amongst the leaves overhead. On such occasions it is pretty
easy, by keeping quiet, to get a shot.

Male. Irides hazel; eyelids bright crimson; bill a darker
crimson ; tarsi and feet black.

40. Mrsopicus MENnstRuus (Scop.). Olivaceous Wood-
pecker.

These Woodpeckers are not uncommon in the forests of
the Gold-fields, and are invariably found in pairs; and if one
is shot the other will not leave the spot, but for some days is
to be found close by, still looking for its lost mate.

_ 41. Coccystrs sacoBinus (Bodd.). Black-and-white Cuckoo.
During both the seasons when we were at the Gold-fields
a few of these noisy Cuckoos appeared there in the spring,
and were evidently breeding, though we could not find the |
nests in which they laid.
Male. Iris dusky; bill black ; tarsi and feet dusky ash-
colour. Contents of stomach caterpillars and other insects.

in the Lydenburg District of Transvaal. 433

42. Cucutus sotitartius, Steph. Red-chested Cuckoo.

My brother shot this bird on January 24 from a tree close
to where he was digging; and this was the only individual we
saw in that part of the country. It was sitting motionless,
and much resembled a small Hawk.

Male. Iris dark hazel; bill black, yellowish at the gape;
eyelids, tarsi, and feet yellow.

43. PeristTeRA LARVATA (Temm.). White-masked Dove.

These Doves are pretty common in the dense bush and
underwood of the kloofs; but more than two are seldom found
together. They utter a low melancholy note, and are not very
easy to shoot, as they are generally on the ground, and on
the approach of any one are up in a great bustle and are im-
mediately lost to sight.

44. CURSORIUS SENEGALENSIS (Licht.). Senegal Courser.

Scarce in this part of the country. My brother and I came
across a pair on July 24, and shot the bird now sent.

Female. Iris dusky; bill dusky, but pale on the under
mandible; shanks, tarsi, and feet white.

Besides the above-mentioned birds, I am certain of the
following as found in the Gold-fields district :—Oriolus larvatus
(=capensis), Batis capensis (=pristinaria), Tchitrea viridis
(=cristata of Layard), Tchitrea cyanomelas, Corvultur albi-
collis, Amydrus morio, Vidua ardens, Pyrenestes albifrons,
Estrelda astrild, Columba arquatriz, Francolinus levaillantz,
Francolinus nudicollis, Coturnix dactylisonans, Gallinago ma-
crodactyla (=equatorialis), and Anas sparsa.

[Mr. Ayres’s previous papers on the birds of Transvaal
record 152 species (vide Ibis, 1874, p. 107). The present
paper records (inter alia) 40 additional species, making the
total number of species observed by Mr. Ayres in Trans-
vaal 192.—J. H. G.]

434 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

XLITI.—Notes on the Birds of the Lower Petchora. By
Henry Seesoum, F.Z.S., and Joun A. Harvir Brown.

[Continued from p. 311, and concluded. |

As the snow gradually disappeared from the more exposed
hill-sides behind Ust Zylma, and signs of coming summer
began to gladden us after our long weary waiting, we looked
forward each day with increasing expectancy for the vanguard
of the great flights of migratory birds, which would, ere long,
fill the pine forests, and the fields behind the town, and the
birch-covered banks and islands of the river with life. With
scarcely less eagerness, and with even greater bustle of pre-
paration, did our good friends MM. Znaminsky and Sacharoft
(keen sportsmen both) look forward to the arrival of the
wildfowl ; and various small excursions were undertaken to
certain well-known haunts in the vicinity, to ascertain whether
or not they were beginning to put in an appearance. Of the
wildfowl, Swans and Geese were the first to arrive; but
Ducks were not observed in any numbers until some days
later, viz. upon the eve of the breaking-up of the ice on the
river Zylma, which took place on the 20th May. For some
days previous to that date a remarkable change in the ap-
pearance of the ice of the Petchora had become obvious; and
the ice of the Zylma had become still more suggestive of ap-
proaching dissolution. Looking away down the great river
as we crossed it on the night of the 18th May, it seemed
vaster and calmer in the stillness; looked like a great limit-
less plain towards the north, with a few wooded oases (islands)
on the horizon distinctly defined against the white light of
the northern sky. Scarcely any snow remained on the sur-
face; and large lakes of snow-water had formed here and there,
those nearest the shore fed by considerable streams and run-
lets from the high grounds behind Ust Zylma. Water-holes
were not scarce in the ice of the Zylma, wells of water bub-
bling up through holes and fissures, showing the rapid disso-
lution going on underneath, and the increasing upward pres-
sure of the water. The great cavity beneath the ice had
become filled up; and the water hour after hour, even minute

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 435

after minute, was gaining volume and strength, soon to burst
up the solid roof of ice over which we were passing. Our
horses advanced slowly with ears pricked up and heads low,
and sometimes positively refused to advance at all until the
“vemstchik” went before them to test the strength of the
ice. We arrived at 34.m. on the morning of the 19th May
at the log-hut on the bank of the Zylma, whither MM:
Znaminsky and Sacharoff had preceded us. Ducks were in
countless thousands resting on the larger pools of water on
the ice, and flying in all directions around. The meadows in
the vicinity are favourite haunts at feeding-time of both Geese
and Ducks ; and we had come over to get some flight-shooting
at these great bands of migratory wildfowl. About 9.30 4.m.
on the 20th May the Zylma ice was on the move, and the
water, rising rapidly, being dammed back by the accumu-
lation of ice at its mouth, began to flood the meadows and
rush back through the “kourias,’ converting, in the short
space of six or seven hours, the whole country on the south
bank of the Zylma into a vast lake. We had had our shoot-
ing; and it was not without some little trouble that we
managed to return to Ust Zylma, with the aid of a boat
brought by our men across the centre ice and across the lanes
of water formed along both shores of the Petchora. The
Ducks disappeared as if by magic, dispersing over the country
or migrating again en masse further to the north. On the
21st the Petchora ice broke up; and ten days later the river
was clear of ice, and a vast tract of the country on the western
or left bank was flooded by the rapidly rising waters. On
the 10th June we commenced our journey down the river,
having seen comparatively little of the wildfowl on migra-
tion, with the exception of that one night’s flight-shooting,
which, however, is something to be remembered. What we
did see of the different species will be found mentioned each
under its own heading.

We may here mention that during our trip we pro-
cured the eggs and down of ten species of Ducks; and upon
carefully examining the different kinds we were able to

SER. III.—VOL. VI. 2H

;
M :
bs]
| |
be
it
oF |
OP
Eh
%
in
f

436 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

institute the comparison which appears in the following
table :— 7

A. White down: (1) Smew, (2) Golden-eye.

B. White-tipped down: (1) Pintail, (2) Widgeon.

C. Large dark down, without white tips: (1) Black Scoter,
(2) Velvet Scoter, (3) Scaup.

D. Small dark down, without white tips: (1) Long-tailed
Duck, (2) Shoveller, (3) Teal.

A. White.
(1) Smew. Down large, greyish white.

(2) Golden-eye. Down scarcely to be distinguished from
the last, but has a slight bluish tinge; bluish white.

B. White-tipped.
(1) Pintail. Down smaller, brown, with pale centres, in-
distinctly tipped with white.
(2) Widgeon. Down larger, darker brown than Pintail’s,
pale centres, long and conspicuous white tips.

C. Large dark, without white tips.
(1) Black Scoter. Down medium size, darker brown than
Pintail’s, lighter than Widgeon’s, centres pale but conspicuous.
(2) Velvet Scoter. Down larger than Black Scoter’s, darker

than Pintail’s or Widgeon’s, centres less conspicuous than

Black Scoter’s.

(3) Scaup. Down about same size as Velvet Scoter’s,
but darker, centres inconspicuous.

D. Small dark, without white tips.

(1) Long-tailed Duck. Down small, darkish brown, with
pale centres.

(2) Shoveller. Down small, darker than Long-tailed Duck’s,
pale centres.

(3) Teal. Down small, darker Lfdiwer than either Long-
tailed Duck’s or Shoveller’s, pale centres.

Note. The above downs were examined in bulk in a clear
but not too bright light, and in the absence of direct rays of

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 4.37

sun-light. Compare descriptions of various kinds of Duck’s
down given by Sommerfeldt (‘ Zoologist,’ June 1867, p. 776),
in which, however, the downs are described from single sprays.
Our method, we believe, will also be found useful in assisting
to distinguish them.

Cyenus musicus, Bechst.

Wild Swans were amongst the first migrants to appear; and
the first note we have of their arrival is dated the 11th May.
They were afterwards seen occasionally betore the snow melted
and up to the date of the breaking-up of the ice on the Zylma
(20th May), but not again until the 12th June, when as
we descended the river a flock of five or six were seen fre-
quenting a lagoon, and were disturbed by the flag flying at
our masthead as it appeared above the fringing belt of willows.
Afterwards we saw Swans occasionally along the river, and
numerously in the neighbourhood of Alexievka. We found
a nest of eggs on an island opposite Kuya on the 17th June;
and several nests were brought in by the Zyriani and by our
own men, who were expressly told off to find Swans’ nests,
and, if possible, to secure the birds. In this latter part of
their instructions, however, they signally failed; and we had
almost despaired of identifying the rarer species and obtain-
ing authentic eggs, although we felt tolerably certain that
Swans of two sizes did pass Ust Zylma on migration. We
saw Wild Swans frequenting the “ kourias”’ and delta gene-
rally up to the last days of our stay. As we left Alexievka
on our voyage home on board the ‘Triad’ we met five boats
returning from Varandai; and we were told by the Russian
sailors on board the steamer which was towing us out of the
river that they would bring many furs and Swans’ and other
skins to the great markets. At the end of August boats
return from the still more distant island of Kolguef with many
Swans’ skins, and the down of various species of wildfowl.
We regretted that we could not have remained one day longer
at Alexievka to have seen these Varandai fishermen as they
passed. These stores of furs and birds’ skins, reindeer’s

2H2

a a ne eer
ot

Po pCR Sa
Be Ses
> Se
i
ater

, { .
:
f
i
i

CRT ES CONN OE ae

438 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

flesh and seal-oil, find their way, for the most part, to the
markets of Pifiega, and even as far as Nijni- Novgorod.

CYGNUS BEWICKI.

To determine if possible the breeding-haunts of this species
of Swan, and bring home authentic eggs to England, was one
of the principal aims of our expedition. From the time of
our arrival at Ust Zylma in the middle of April, to that of our
departure for the delta in the beginning of June, we had ac-
quired no satisfactory evidence of its presence. We were
informed by the inhabitants at Ust Zylma, and by the best
sportsmen of the town, that there were two species, but that
the smaller went to the east of the Ural Mountains to breed.
But we had long since ceased to attach much importance to
any information we received on such subjects. Information
almost invariably proved conflicting and unsatisfactory.

We had received a very small Swan’s egg which had been
brought the previous summer from Gorodok; but we could
learn nothing further concerning it, except that it might have
originally come from Varandai, or might have been taken in
the neighbourhood of Gorodok. We examined two speci-
mens of the Common Wild Swan, shot near Ust Zylma at
the time of migration, and took drawings and measurements
for future use. We had ourselves seen a good many Swans
flying overhead or settling on the ice of the river; but in no
case were we able to identify them, though we settled in our
own minds that there were two of different sizes.

With nothing therefore to guide us in our search, save the
last-mentioned item, we started on our voyage down the
river in the beginning of June. We saw Swans here and
there, but without identifying them. On arriving at Kuya,
and while shooting on a swampy willow-covered island close
to that place, Seebohm and Simeon found a Swan’s nest
containing four eggs. We lay for a couple of hours after-
wards near the nest in the hope of getting a shot. Simeon
was heard to remark, “If the Swan is a little blind perhaps
he will shoot it.” We did not shoot it, and no wonder, as a
pair of Hooded Crows, which had a nest in the vicinity,

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 439

loudly proclaimed our unwelcome presence, and, moreover,
the somewhat open willow-scrub offered but a very insuffi-
cient means of concealment. The mosquitos too bit badly,
and we had no veils. We consoled ourselves with the fact
that the four eggs were very large, and finally gave in,
took them, and the next day continued our voyage until
we arrived at Alexievka. On the islands of the delta our
men searched diligently for Swans’ nests, incited by the offer
of a reward of five roubles for the eggs and bird of any species
of Swan, which reward we promised to any one, either of our
own men or of the Zyriani workmen, who would bring them
to us. ‘Two or three nests were found. At one a trap was
set by Simeon and Little Feodor, which was too weak to
hold the bird. The two eggs of this nest were smaller than
any we had yet got. All chance of identifying these was
lost, as the Swan had gone into the trap and left in it only a
few feathers. Atanother nest we watched a whole day and
night in a small branch-hut which had been erected previous
to our own arrival at the spot, and which was quite sufficient
in itself to scare any Swan away. Piottuch and Harvie
Brown relieved one another at the post, but, it is almost need-
less to say, without success; indeed the watch was kept up
more for the purpose of doing all possible justice to the finder
than with any expectation of getting a shot. This nest was
in the midst of dense jungle of willow-scrub between two
small lakes. There were no tracks leading to it made by the
birds; and the only way they could have come to it must have
been from above.

It is needless to recount more failures. Suffice it to say
that the difficulties of finding a Swan’s nest and afterwards
of obtaining the bird it belonged to are very considerable
in these densely covered islands of the Petchora delta. Had
we possessed a good steel trap or two, perhaps we should
have had better success, perhaps not.

At last, one day, the 29th June, a Russian fisherman arrived
in his boat at Alexievka, having come from his fishing-encamp-
ment lower down the river. He brought with him some
eges, and amongst them two very small Swan’s eggs, which

a)
phen
f

, 1
4
has
Ha te
Bs
a!
*
fj

Get Sis. :
ERATOR LS Ee

u
}

440 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

we purchased. He then told us that the bird had been caught
at the nest, and was in the possession of his mate, who was

still fishing down the river. He could not have heard any

thing of our offer of a reward, as we were the first to speak
with him after his arrival. We took the first opportunity,
which occurred some days after (on the 6th July) , of going down
the river with the steamer to Stanavoialachta, near which
place we found the men we wanted, one of whom was known
to our steersman, Big Feodor, and whom some time before
we ourselves had actually spoken to when returning from our
first trip to Stanavoialachta. We were promptly informed
that the skin of the Swan was then lying at Mikitsa, a small
village five versts south of Kuya, in the house of the fisher-
man who had sent it up there, and that we could get it if
we paid for it. We returned to Alexievka; and next day we
intrusted our most intelligent man, Little Feodor, to ferret
out the bird at Mikitsa, sending him up to Kuya in the
steamer. In due course he returned triumphantly bearing
the skin, with feet attached, and the bill separate. He had
purchased the former for one rouble, and had also secured
the bill, which, in accordance with the usual practice, had

_ been cut off and given to the children to play with. There

was no other Swan’s skin in the house, nor, as far as he could
learn, in the village, except this. It was Bewick’s Swan;
and we have every reason to believe, and none whatever to
doubt, that it was the veritable bird caught upon the nest
which contained the two eggs which we had purchased from
the other fisherman on the 29th June. We consider these
eggs thoroughly satisfactory, and the chain of evidence in all
reason complete.

The egg of C. bewickt is smaller than that of C. musicus,
the former measuring 3°95 inches in length, and the latter
4°1 to 4°6. We may also remark that our eggs of the Wild
Swan are cream-coloured and glossy, whilst those of Bewick’s
Swan are white and dull.

On the 26th July two of our boatmen, Little Feodor and
Simeon, came to the wreck at Dvoinik carrying a fine Bew-
ick’s Swan. They had had a long day and night upon the

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 441

tundra, and had covered a considerable extent of country.
According to their account, extracted by much cross-question-
ing, with and without Piottuch’s assistance, they had been
away towards the south-west and had seen a great lake near
the sources of the Hevka and Erisvanka rivers. They said
they had walked a distance of twenty-five to thirty versts—
which, upon the North-Russian tundra, is equivalent at least
to as many miles on a Yorkshire moor. They had seen nine
Swans, ‘all of the small kind,” at the edge of the big lake,
and had succeeded in stalking up to within thirty paces of
them. On being slightly alarmed the Swans swam close up
together and stretched up their necks. Simeon and Feodor
both aimed; but Feodor’s “ pooshka”’ (literally cannon) re-
fused to go off. Feodor therefore was left disconsolate; but
Simeon succeeded in shooting one. Afterwards we saw
several Swans at Dvoinik, and the footprints of others on the
damp sand or mud. The measurements of these latter agreed
with the specimen procured, the middle toe of which is nearly
one inch shorter than that of the larger species. We con-
sider that Bewick’s Swan is not uncommon on the delta of
the Petchora, but, from what we have seen, that its distribu-
tion there does not extend so far up the river in the breeding-
season as that of the Hooper, but that both species pass Ust
Zylma on migration, though of this last we cannot, of course,
speak positively.

ANSER SEGETUM (Gm.).

The Bean-Goose arrived at Ust Zylma on the 10th May.
Small parties and sometimes large flocks continued to fre-
_ quent the neighbourhood wherever there was any open water
until the ice and snow had all disappeared, when the Geese
disappeared also. At Kuya, on the 19th June, we got eggs
of the Bean-Goose considerably incubated. At Alexievka
we not unfrequently found their nests concealed in the long
grass on some hillock or islet on the banks of the lakes on
the tundra, and we secured a number of eggs. We did not
find any of their nests on the islands of the delta. The Bean-
Goose is an early breeder, and doubtless makes its nest on

ee rk
er ee eee

stg Sx Sas
ett tae

4
i134
A

2 SS Se SS

ETRE a
tat 2.
=u Se a

We met ee eT

~ 2
eee, SEs!

Sn ee aS SE
222s 3 Sa ESTE = 3238

A Ste ei oa

442 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

the tundra before the great march-past of ice on the river 1s
over, and whilst most of the islands are still under water.
Soon after the young are hatched, before they are able to fly,
these birds congregate in large flocks, and march slowly into
the tundra to moult. The Samoyedes gave us glowing ac-
counts of the grand battues which they used to have at these
times, killing the Geese with sticks, and collecting large sacks
full of down and feathers. Seebohm was fortunate enough
to come across one of these migratory flocks of Geese. It was
on the 27th July, whilst we were living in a wrecked ship on
the shores of the lagoon at Dvoinik. He had crossed over
to the North Twin Cape, and was skirting the margin of the
river which winds inland between high banks of grass, when
he heard a Joud cackle of Geese. A bend in the river gave
him an opportunity of stalking them. As soon as he caught
sight of them a most interesting and extraordinary scene pre-
sented itself. Several hundred old Geese and about as many
young were marching like a regiment of soldiers. ‘The van-
guard, all old birds, were half across the stream, whilst the
goslings brought up the rear, and were running down the
steep slope towards the water as fast as their legs could carry
them. Both banks of the river were strewed with feathers,
where they had no doubt been feeding ; anda handfull of quill
feathers was picked up in five minutes. They were evidently
migrating to the interior of the tundra, moulting as they
went along. The following day we discovered that our stock
of provisions was entirely exhausted, and we sent a party
after this flock of Geese. They met with them a few versts
higher up the river, and succeeded in securing eleven old
birds and five goslings. Most of the Geese were in full
moult and unable to fly; and Piottuch told us that both old
and young made for the water and attempted to conceal them-
selves by diving.

ANAS CLYPEATA, L. |

The Shoveller does not appear to be so abundant on the
Petchora as it was found to be on the delta of the Dvina,
where it almost equalled in numbers those of the Pintail

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 443

(Ibis, 1873, p. 71). Only one bird, a male, was identified
at Ust Zylma, on the 19th June; and on our voyage down
the river only one other, a female, was seen. The Zyriani
at Alexievka brought in only one set of eggs, along with the
down ; and upon an island called Glubauki*, opposite Sta-
navolalachta, we found another nest containing two eggs.
There was very little down in this last nest wherewith to
identify the eggs; but we distinctly saw both birds: the male
alighted at the entrance of a narrow lane of water amongst
the grass which led to the nest; and on being joined by the
female, both flew off to their feeding-grounds.

ANAS CRECCA, L.

Teal were first seen and one shot on the 18th May as a
small party of them dashed along the course of the stream
formed by the melting snow, which came surging down
the valley behind the town of Ust Zylma. We also shot Teal
on the meadows on the banks of the Zylma the night before
the ice broke up, and procured several nests of eggs at Ha-
bariki and on the Yorsa; but we did not see any among the
islands of the delta, nor upon the tundra.

It is somewhat remarkable that we saw nothing of the com-
mon Wild Duck (Anas boschas) on the Petchora, though it
is a common species around Archangel (Ibis, 1873, p. 71) ;
and as it is so generally distributed throughout Europe,
we consider this negative evidence worthy of record.

Anas acuta, L.

The Pintail was first identified on the morning of the 18th
May, when three birds flew close overhead. On the evening
of the same day we accompanied MM. Znaminsky and Sa-
charoff to the feeding-grounds on the banks of the Zylma,
where we found vast numbers of Ducks congregated. From
what we saw that night and the following day we believe
that nine tenths of the many thousands of Ducks identified
belonged to this species. When the ice broke up on the
Zylma on the morning of the 20th May, these great flocks
dispersed or repaired en masse to some more northern locality ;

* Lit. deep water.

ee a a ee ee
ponies wang arc = aetna Bs aren ley

—

{
)

444 Messrs: H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

and when we descended the river three weeks later we found
them already breeding in numbers. We found the Pintail
abundant all the way down the river and as far as we went
along the coast, both on the delta and on the tundra, and
obtained large numbers of their eggs, which, along with those
of other species were a welcome addition to our food-supply.

ANAS PENELOPE, L.

The Widgeon is certainly the most abundant species of
Duck inhabiting the shores and islands of the Petchora
between Ust Zylma and Alexievka, if we judge by the im-
mense numbers of their eggs found by ourselves or brought
to us by the Zyriani. At the time of migration we only
identified one bird, a male, amongst the large flocks of Pin-
tails on the Zylma; and on the 21st May another was brought
to us for sale. They probably arrived somewhat later than
the Pintails did, and thus escaped our notice at the time of
migration; but while descending the river, on and after the
10th June, we found many nests, and met with them more
abundantly than the Pintails as far north as the delta. Yoo-
shina was the furthest north point at which we saw them,
where they were seen in company with Scoters, Scaups, and
Long-tailed Ducks, Bean-Geese, Black- and Red-throated
Divers, and were frequenting a chain of lovely little pools and
lakes on the tundra. We obtained fresh eggs of Widgeon

during most of our stay at Alexievka, and as late as the mid-
dle of July.

FULIGULA MARILA, L.

On the 12th June, as we descended the river, the flag at
our masthead disturbed a number of Wild Swans on a pond
behind a fringing belt of willows. We landed; and while
endeavouring to get a shot at another Swan upon another
pool adjoining, we had an opportunity of adding the present
species to our list. Peeping through the interstices of the
willow-branches and old trunks, we saw a fine lot of Ducks
swimming peacefully about upon the pond or lagoon formed
by the overflow of the river. Before they were disturbed the
seclusion and quiet of the place was perfect, reminding one

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 445

of the same sort of scene in a wildfowl-sanctuary at home.
The same species of birds were there too. Two Widgeons
were in the foreground, the male occasionally whistling as he
floated lazily about ; a little further off were two Teal; and
up and down over the surface of the water were a number of
fine Scaup Ducks swimming in pairs or small parties, fre-
quently uttermg their harsh cries. At the far end a solitary
Swan floated, its head high, and its neck straight, already on
the gui vive. The Scaup Ducks shortly became suspicious, and
swam up close together. ‘The Swan took the hint, and, beat-
ing the water with his wings, rose and flew off, followed by
Scaups, Widgeon, and Teal.

We afterwards found the Scaup not uncommon in certain
localities, but did not meet with any further north than Yoo-
shina. They did not appear to be abundant at Alexievka, as
the Zyriani only brought in one set of eggs and down.

FULIGULA CRISTATA.

The Tufted Duck appeared to be scarce upon the Petchora,
as far as we could observe. The first was obtained by See-
bohm at an island a little below Viski on the 17th June; and
on the 19th Harvie Brown shot another on the island op-
posite Kuya. These were the only specimens procured ; and
not more than one or two others were identified.

FULIGULA CLANGULA (L.).

We did not see much of this species, as we stayed only a
short time in the forest-country after their arrival. We iden-
tified one Golden-eye at the feeding-grounds on the Zylma,
and obtained two sets of eggs at Habariki from the peasants.
A nesting-hole was pointed out to us in a dead larch, 25 feet
from the ground, from which our informant had taken the
down and fourteen eggs, which we purchased from him. We
did not meet with the species again lower down the river.

Harepa Guaciazis (L.).

We saw nothing of the Long-tailed Duck on migration,
nor until we arrived at Kuya. ‘There we found them not un-
common on the islands opposite the village, and afterwards
met with them abundantly on the tundra, and less plentifully

Sec SOS FF IE EE PET =

ee, STS ET SS SO ES

——

- Ss ~ i ey fe ee ee ee ei Se eS
- ae - : os —-
ras a : —P¢ . _ a

446 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

on the islands. Almost every lakelet on the tundra held a
pair; and several pairs are often seen on the larger lakes. It
is certainly the commonest Duck on the tundra. In the
evenings also their curious cries, “ cow-cow-w-te,” or, as we
sometimes imagined, “ kolqu-d-ef” (the name of a large island
in the Arctic Sea north of the Kafiin tundra), were heard
constantly at Alexievka; and a large lagoon close to the houses
was pretty regularly frequented by them. We believe, how-
ever that all the eggs brought to us by the Zyriani were taken
on the tundra and not on the islands, because this species
does not frequent the islands for the purpose of breeding.
This is the tamest species of Duck with which we are ac-
quainted, being almost Grebe-like in its unwillingness to
take wing. ‘They are, on the other hand, experts at diving,
and, although they often permit of a close approach in the
open, they are difficult to shoot, eluding the charge of shot
by rapid and repeated diving. On the larger lakes they
sought safety by swimming out to the centre, where they
could calmly repose in conscious security. We obtained the
young near Kuya, on the occasion of our second visit, and at
Dvoinik, when the parent: bird showed great solicitude, swim-
ming up to the brood and trying to prevail upon them to follow
her otit to the centre of the lake, the young apparently being
more inclined to hug the shore. We did not take any eggs
ourselves; but Simeon explained by signs that they were
generally placed under thick bushes of dwarf willow, birch,
or juniper (pointing to a plant of each), and were well con-
cealed. Two nests, however, which we saw at Dvoinik, after
the young had been hatched out, were deep cup-like hollows in
the bare dry meadow, chosen amongst the vegetable scum
which had been thrown up and left by the water, and which,
either by accident or design, formed part of the lining and
edging of the nests. We gathered the down from these nests,
but did not see any shells of broken eggs lying in or near
them. We obtained eggs not very far advanced in incubation
at Dvoinik as late as the end of July. These were brought
in by our men.

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 44:7

CipEemia nieRA (L.).

The first Common Scoter was identified as it flew close past
the steamer at Ust Zylma on the Ist June. Afterwards, at vari-
ous localities, Common Scoters were seen by us as we floated
down stream ; and they were common on the tundra as far north
as Stanavoialachta, especially among the lakes near Vassilkova
and Yooshina, and at Stanavoilachta, where the tundra has
more the appearance of a rolling prairie than elsewhere. At
Yooshina, on the south side of the river of that name, some
parts of the tundra are very beautiful, being a rolling moor,
covered on the top with reindeer-moss and carices, and quan-
tities of crow-berries, and with thickets of low scrub-willow
and birch in the hollows and beside the numerous little tarns
and pools. Small streams of beautifully clear water, perhaps
not more than a foot or two wide, and the same or more in
depth, with gravelly or sandy bottom, unite a chain of these
lakes, by the sides of which are often curiously shaped mounds,
like old ant-hills, covered with ‘dried leaves of the arctic
bramble (Rubus arcticus), and bearing still a plentiful supply
of last year’s cranberries. By the side of one of these little
runlets of water, in an opening in the scrub, we found quite
a little forest of aureola-plant (Veratrum album) (Ibis, 1878,
p- 62), and also quantities of marsh-marigold, golden saxi-
frage, and a dwarf geranium. Broad-leaved sorrel, too, in
the absence of all vegetable food, was as refreshing to the
palate as to the eye.

Cn one of the lakes we saw assembled the following wild-
fow] :—two male Scaups, two pairs of Long-tailed Ducks, a
pair of Bean-Geese, a pair of Widgeon, a Black-throated
Diver, and a Red-throated Diver, a Red-breasted Merganser
(the first we had seen), and several Red-necked Phalaropes.
At the time of our visit to the Golaievskai banks, vast num-
bers of Black Scoters were congregated along the shore and
in the water on the inside of the island called No. 3 in the
Admiralty Chart. When we approached they all rose and
flew away in a body to the southward. As has already been
remarked, large flocks of these or other Ducks seen at a dis-
tance on a calm glassy sea, and with refraction busily at

448 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

work, were often scarcely to be distinguished from the low-
lying sandbanks we were in search of. (Vide also Gurney’s
‘Rambles of a Naturalist in Egypt,’ 1876, p. 92, where he
makes a similar comparison regarding the flocks of Ducks at
Lake Menzaleh.)

(ipemia Fusca (L.).

On the 27th June, whilst wandering amongst the many
lakes which dot the tundra around Stanavoialachta, Harvie
Brown saw a single pair of these birds flying over the tundra
some distance off, conspicuous beside a number of the Com-
mon Scoter, which were haunting a lake close by, from their
superior size and large white alar specula. One of them,
presumably the female, dropped amongst some dwarf willows
and birch in a hollow about a verst off; and the male con-
tinued his flight. In the hope of finding the nest, Harvie
Brown. searched the whole of the patch of dwarf wood care-
fully, but failed to flush the bird or find the nest.

We visited Stanavoialachta a second time, later in the sea-
son, viz. on 6th July; and we proposed to repair together to
these lakes and search again for the Velvet Scoters, the only
birds of the species we had seen. Scarcely had we made up
our minds to this, and were crossing the tundra together to-
wards the lakes, when almost from amongst our feet up got
the bird from the nest, and Seebohm shot it. The nest was
under a creeping, matted, dwarf birch, far from any water,
and contained eight eggs and a good supply of down. These

- were the only eggs we procured of the Velvet Scoter in Russia,

and we saw no more birds.

Merevus auBeuuvs (L.).

Habariki is a small hamlet of about a dozen houses. It
stands on an earth cliff on the bank of a ‘kouria,’ and is gene-
rally safe even from the higher floods which cover the sur-
rounding country, being about fifty feet above the winter
level of the river. This spring the floods had raised the level
about twenty feet. (It is at Habariki that the river-steamer
hes in winter quarters; and the captain lives in the village.)
In exceptionally high floods, after the disappearance of the

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 449

ice, only a few acres of cultivated land around the village are
left uncovered. On allsides the ground slopes gradually away,
except on that side which faces the Kouria and the river. In
the distance across the Petchora to the westward, about fifty
versts distant, the low ranges of the Timan Mountains are
visible ; and we were told that many many versts of the inter-
vening willow-covered meadows were under water at the time
of our visit. Round the village is a cleared space of ground ;
and surrounding this there is a fine old forest of pine, larch,
and spruce, with underwood beneath. Some parts of the forest
are open, especially those where pine alone appears to flourish,
light sandy soil forming a slightly higher ridge of land, covered
with a soft carpet of reindeer-moss, and sprinkled with crow-
berry, cranberry, and bilberry plants. All over these opener
pine-tracts lie great quantities of bleached and barkless frag-
ments of pine wood, the origin, no doubt, of the great piles
of drift wood along the shore at Dvoimik. They are accumu-
lating there until a higher flood than usual lifts and carries
them away. Other parts of the forest are denser and more
mixed. Many noble old larches are still untouched by the
axe; but many more prostrate stems and high stumps leave
record of the ruthless and reckless destruction done and still
going on. The finest trees are cut down for firewood ; if,
after being felled, they are found unsound, they are left to
rot, or finally to drift away on some future flood*. Small
spruce-firs comprise the bulk of the growth; but in some
places the larches are also quite abundant. In the swampy
places and along the river-side, on the edges of the pine-
forests, are dense thickets of alder and willow, amongst the

* For statistics connected with the fuel-supply of Russia, in which the
statement is made that “ within fifty-four years Russia’s supply of timber
will be exhausted to the last faggot,” see ‘The Geographical Magazine’
for March 1876, p.61. It is there stated that the total amount of timber
possessed by Russia at present is 193,354,000 dessatines (the dessatine being
equal to 211 English acres), and the annual consumption being 72,000,000
cubic sajens (a sajen=7 English feet) for firewood alone. To naturalists
in this connexion the question naturally presents itself, ‘‘ Will the Smew
retreat before the axe, or adapt itself to another mode of nidification than
in hollow trees ?”

a Sk Ne
ee pore! a

= ae

450 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

stems and branches of which immense quantities of drift
timber have been left by the floods, or he upon the land piled
up in masses, or spread in regular layers, or floating in the
“kourias,” over which latter runs the nimble Terek Sand-
piper.

Behind Habariki, about half a verst distant, is an immense
swamp lying in the midst of old forest, and with pools of
water dotted about over its surface. It is quite two versts in
length by one verst or more in breadth. Here and there
also in the forest are large and small lakes, swamps, and
curious circular hollows with regularly formed banks, some
of the latter dry and covered with moss and decayed water-
plants, chiefly Potamogeton (sp.?), and some having pools of
water in the middle. These appear to form a winding chain
through the woods, being joined by swamps or by dry water-
worn trenches. Round the lakes the forest stands like a wall,
the stems of the trees bleached by sun and water and marked
with constant friction of drift wood, the height of former
floods being distinctly traced six or seven feet up from their
bases. It is in the broken stumps or prostrate trunks the
Smews breed; and the only set of eggs and down we got was
brought to us by a peasant who had found it in the former
situation. We saw many pairs of Smews during our visit
to Habariki, on the pools on the large marsh and on the
woodland lakes; but we did not meet with them elsewhere
on our trip.

Merevs castor (L.).

One pair of Goosanders was distinctly identified by Harvie
Brown on the waters of the marsh behind Habariki. These
were the only specimens seen about which there can be no
doubt, though a good many more were seen too far out for
perfectly satisfactory identification.

MeERGUS SERRATOR (L.).

The first bird of this species was seen by Harvie Brown at
the lakes on the tundra to the south of the Yooshina river.
He fired at it and wounded it severely. They were after-
wards seen by him on six different occasions, and perfectly

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 451

identified, viz. at Alexievka, Bougrai, and on the river Dvoinik
and on the small river flowing into the inland sea (anted,
p. 300). They always defied capture, diving rapidly at the
flash, swimming a long way up or down stream, and reappear-
ing out of range. We failed to discover the nest.

STERNA HIRUNDO, L.

Soon after passing Chuvinski, on our voyage down the river,
two Terns were seen at a distance and were brought within
range by an imitation of their note. The species was then
suspected, by the ash-grey colour of the lower parts, to be
the Arctic Tern; and we soon afterwards had an opportunity
of procuring both birds and eggs, and verifying our previous
recognition of the species. We found the Arctic Tern abun-
dantly at different localities—more especially, however, at
Kuya (on the occasion of our second visit, when we procured
the young), at an island near Alexievka, along the shore at
Yooshina, on an island near Stanavoialachta, and at Dvoinik.
They bred higher up the river in single pairs here and there,
and not in colonies, as far as we had opportunity of observing ;
but at the second of the above-mentioned localities there was
a considerable colony. At this place one was knocked down
with a stick by Little Feodor.

Larus canus, L.

The Common Gull was seen in great numbers at Ust Zylma
on the 15th May, and for several days after, resting on the
ice of the Petchora by the sides of the surface-pools of melted
snow. ‘They were very wild; but by a long random shot into
a large assemblage of these and another species (Larus affinis °),
we were enabled to secure specimens. From what we saw of
the Common Gull afterwards along the course of the river,
we can almost believe that every pair which breeds on the
Petchora below Ust Zylma was included in the above-men-
tioned. assemblage ; or, in other words, all that breed upon the
Petchora between Ust Zylma and the sea pass Ust Zylma on
migration. We found them nowhere in abundance after-
wards; and they were generally seen in single pairs, and not
in colonies. We did not meet with them north of Kuya.

SER. I1I.—VOL. VI. . aI

|
|
t
.
:
,

Sa eiee eT eS

SESE ass STS SSE ac PS CEST SS ee neo =

mera

f
b,
'
i
)
;
’,
Fy
il i
h
hh
ft
a}
4
+
Y

452 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

At the time of migration we saw several of these birds perch
together on a high leafy birch tree.

Larus Marinus, L.

The Great Black-backed Gull appears to be decidedly scarce,
both on the river and on the shores of the Petchora Gulf.
The first two we saw were resting on an island near Alexievka,
where the Arctic Terns were also found in numbers. They
were easily identified as they were sitting beside several indi-
viduals of Larus affinis, their superior size being evident at
aglance. Afterwards we met with them sparingly at Dvoinik
along the shore, but obtained no examples; nor did we obtain
any eggs or young.

Larus AFFINIS, Reinhardt ?

The Siberian Herring-Gull arrived on migration at Ust
Zy|lma about the 11th May. It breeds on the shores of the
delta and the lagoons of the Petchora. We obtained several
of its eggs, which do not differ from those of the other Euro-
pean Herring-Gulls. Nearly all the birds which frequent
the Petchora were in adult plumage. We shot two birds in
immature plumage, and may have seen a couple more.
Wherever a party of fishermen was stationed there were sure
to be plenty of Herring-Gulls. They hovered over the nets
as they were being dragged in, and frequently secured small
fish as they attempted to escape.

This species is intermediate in the colour of its mantle be-
tween the Mediterranean Herring-Gull and the Lesser Black-
backed Gull. Like both those species, it has yellow legs; and
the circle round the eye is brilliant vermilion, or the colour
of a Seville orange. It is, however, emphatically a Herring-
Gull, as the coloration of the primaries abundantly proves.
It agrees in the colour of the mantle with the description of
Larus affinis of Reinhardt; but we do not for one moment
venture to assert that this is its true name. We may, how-
ever, venture to suggest that the Herring-Gulls which breed
in the Petchora winter on the shores of the Arabian Sea, and
are the species spoken of by Mr. Hume (‘Stray Feathers,’
1873, p. 273) as Larus occidentalis, Audubon. In winter, no

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 453

doubt, the legs lose their yellow colour and become greyish
white, but the orange-red eyelid is retained. Mr. Hume’s
Larus argentatus agrees exactly with the Mediterranean Her-
ring-Gull (L. leucopheus).

Larus eiaucus, L.

Our first acquaintance with the Glaucous Gull in the north
of Russia was made on the night of the 13-14th July, when
we landed upon No. 4 of the Golaievskai group of islands,
Here we shot several old birds, and secured specimens of the
young in down, which latter, upon comparison, resemble the
young of the last-named species, but, as might have been ex-
pected, have fewer and fainter dark markings on the back*.
The nests were heaps of sand hollowed slightly at the apex;
and a few irregularly disposed tufts of coarse seaweed formed
the only lining. Seaweed and small drift wood were the only
materials on the low almost perfectly level sandbank which
the birds could choose from. Afterwards we saw Glaucous
Gulls commonly along the shore at- Dvoinik, and shot. speci-
mens from the deck of the wrecked sloop. The following is
a description of the soft parts of the adult birds obtained by
us :—Legs pale flesh-colour with a tinge of pink ; beak and
round the eye straw-yellow ; point of bill pale horn, and a
vermilion spot on the angle of the lower mandible ; pupils
blue-black, irides pale straw-yellow; inside of mouth pale
flesh-colour.

STeRcoraRiIus crEPIpATUS (Gm.), Saund. P.Z.S8. 1876,
p. 326.

We found the Richardson’s Skua upon the tundra mingling
with flocks of the next species, or scattered in pairs over their
breeding-haunts. Nowhere did we find them so abundant as
the Buffon’s Skua; but though we obtained no eggs of the
latter species, we found several nests of theformer. The first

* We find the young in down of this species described as pure white
on first emergence from the shell (Harting, ‘Fauna of the Prybilov Islands 3
reprinted from the ‘Field’: London, 1875, p. 82), becoming gradually
brownish black and grey as they become older. Those we obtained
were about four or five days old.

214

——

Sig ar:
ee ee ee et ee

lien ct

2 me “ Se ae
- oe ee —
SSeS
a See ee =
=
ms >

SD tee tee a,
—!
Sates Ste
Saag eieaeuelirel aemins

<4 Mey —

-
4

es a ae ro -
- — -—— ——

454 Messrs. H. Seebohm and J. A. Harvie Brown on

Richardson’s Skua we obtained was shot at Stanavoialachta ;
and we afterwards found it at Bougrai*, on the tundra opposite
Alexievka, and at Dvoinik, on the occasion of our first visit
to that place. The eggs were taken at three localities :—
Bougrai; opposite Alexievka, by Simeon, who also shot the
bird; and at Stanavoialachta. At the latter place, when com-
ing home after a long ramble over the tundra, a pair, on a
level part of the tundra, attracted Harvie-Brown’s notice by
their curious antics, which told of the nest being close at
hand. The birds often alighted within fifteen yards, raised
their wings above the back (when they did this the white or
dusky quills showed light upon the raised wing), shammed
lameness and sickness, and stood reeling from side to side as
if mortally wounded. If followed, they tried to lead him away ;
but if he again approached the vicinity of the nest, they flew
boldly towards him and stooped repeatedly. The nest con-
tained two eggs, and was placed on a tussock on mossy ground,
somewhat similar to the Grey-Plover ground before described.
It contained reindeer-moss in small quantities, and leaves of
the surrounding plants. We found another nest at Bougrai,
watching the bird to the nest, and both walking almost straight
up to it from different directions. Amongst all the specimens
of this bird seen or obtained, there were none of the parti-
coloured birds found commonly in this country.

STERCORARIUS PARASITICUS (L.), Saund. P. Z. S. 1876,
p. 330.

The Buffon’s Skua was first identified by Seebohm on an
island near Alexievka, and was afterwards met with abun-
dantly on the tundra, especially at Bougrai, where a flock
of some hundreds had assembled, from which we shot about
a dozen examples. They behaved in exactly the same way
as a colony of Terns. When one was shot the rest of
the flock swooped down or hovered over it. We shot some
of them with dust-shot. After a time the flock would depart
for a quarter of an hour and settle widely apart all over the
tundra ; but they came back repeatedly ; and had we been sup-

* Lit. old jut.

the Birds of the Lower Petchora. 455:

plied with cartridges we might have secured many more.
About a dozen or fifteen Gulls (Larus affinis, Reinhardt) were
frequenting the same ground; but these at once took their
departure and did not return. On several occasions we ob-
served the peculiar Kestrel- or Tern-like hover of the Buffon’s
Skua on wing, and also saw these birds pick up from the
ground, or seize upon the wing, Dunlins and Stints, in the
one case acting like a Hen-Harrier, in the other seizing their
prey like a Falcon. We had cause also to suspect their
depredations amongst the eggs; and Grey Plovers and other
birds often joined in driving them away from their domains.
Sometimes, in the evenings or mornings, we saw long strag-
gling flocks of these Skuas passing over the island of Alex-
ievka, and crossing and recrossing the branch of the Petchora
which separates that island from the fastland. We found
them common all over the tundra as far north-east as we
penetrated.

In the specimens of the two species which we obtained we
found a marked difference in the coloration of the legs and
toes, those of the Richardson’s Skua being uniform dark
brown, while those of Buffon’s Skua were blotched with bluish
grey. In one specimen of the latter there is a single feather
of the under tail-coverts white, with dark brown bars ; in all
the other specimens procured the under tail-coverts are of a
uniform smoky brown. This single feather is doubtless a
last trace of immaturity.

Obs. We saw many specimens of the Pomatorhine Skua
outside the Golaievskai banks on our journey home by sea,
but saw nothing of this species during our stay m Russia.

CoLYMBUS SEPTENTRIONALIS, L.

We added this species to our list on the 12th June as we
were descending the river, when one was shot from the boat.
Afterwards we met with it sparingly on the tundra and ob-
tained their eggs; but the next species appeared to be certainly
the more abundant of the two.

CotymeBus arcticus, L.
We identified the Black-throated diver first at Habariki, on

Ce Ser ee eae

hee
it
"
My
:
i
Wee
i
th
\
5
er
t
in
;

Bee

“eS Se Se eS
are: Bias A = =s Sea

sla

Ses

5 olan ain

Rae
aeet se

pal FE a

Cite Tis a

a sO

:
+]
ty

Wee:
hy
ie

;

‘

{
ai

[
ht

f
eu Ait
men

suletoe
=e ee oe

-“ = # in

odie

==. x 2
4 ae cee a =
=

Se SS See eo

ee
<a eee =<

ees
fS-8 > ete
ee
~, (SA
~ —
——

be ng ee
mt oe

456 Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Genus Malimbus.

the 2nd June, and afterwards met with the species abundantly,
both on the islands and on the tundra as far as Dvoinik,
generally in pairs, and never in large flocks, as observed by
Alston and Harvie Brown on the Dvina (Ibis, 1873, p. 72).
We obtained several sets of eggs, and found one nest built of
water-plants on the edge of a pool in the marsh near the Dvoinik
beacon. This nest was a floating structure, supported by the
growing water-plants around, a very different one from those
generally found on the shores of our own Highland lakes. It
contained one egg of unusually small size, which caused us to
carefully identify the old bird, which flew repeatedly close
overhead and afforded us both ample opportunity without the
necessity of shooting it. We should say, from what we ob-
served of the Black-throated Diver, that it was not so abundant
a species as at Archangel, though also plentiful in all suitable
localities.

In conclusion, we beg to thank those gentlemen, too nu-
merous to mention, to whose kind assistance so much of the
success of our trip is owing. We cannot, however, refrain
from especially thanking Count Schuvéloff for the invaluable
letters of introduction with which he was kind enough to
furnish us, which enabled us to continue our journey without
any delay, and ensured us a reception (in a country which
has probably never been visited by Englishmen for two and
a half centuries) which we shall always look back upon with
pleasure and gratitude as long as we live.

XLIV.—A Review of the Genus Malimbus, Vieillot.
By D. G. Exrioz, F.R.S.E. &e.

(Plate XIII.)

Tue genus Malimbus was first instituted by Vieillot, in his
“Oiseaux Chanteurs,’ for the bird described by Daudin three
years previously in the ‘Annales du Muséum’ as Tunagra
malimbica. Vieillot gave no definition of the genus; and it
was not generally used by ornithologists. In 1816 he sub-
stituted for Malimbus, in the ‘ Analyse,’ the term Sycobius,

Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Genus Malimbus. 457

and gave the characters of the genus; and it is by this generic
name this group of birds has been generally known. After-
wards this appellation was suppressed by the author; and in
1820 Ficophagus was proposed. Although under Sycobius
the genus was first defined, yet, according to the strict rule
of nomenclature, it will have to give way to the first term
proposed, as, without any sufficient reason, an author hardly
has the right to change one name for another.

The small group of African Finches which compose this
genus constitute a part of the family Ploceide, and, with two
exceptions, are conspicuous for their dress of deep black and
rich crimson. ‘T'wo species vary by having a cinereous plu-
mage enriched by red and white; and one unites orange-red
with the general colours borne by the majority of the species.
They are chiefly inhabitants of the west coast of Africa, from
Sierra Leone to Angola, apparently nowhere very abundant.
According to Heuglin, M. melanotis 1s a native of Abyssinia ;
and, so far as I am aware, no other member of the group
has been obtained on the east coast.

The geographical distribution of the nine species, as now
known, is somewhat as follows :—The oldest described mem-
ber of the group, Tanagra malimbica of Daudin (Malimbus
cristatus, Vieillot), has been obtained all along the western
shore from the Gold Coast to the Congo. This is the only
crested species of the genus, and is easily distinguished from
its relatives. The nextin order, M. scutatus of Cassin, has a
somewhat wider range, as the type was sent from Sierra Leone,
and other specimens have been procured at various points
on the coast as far south as the river Murie, a branch of the
Congo, where it was obtained by Du Chaillu. The Gaboon
is the only locality, so far as I know, from which M.
cassini has been received; and this has remained since its dis-
covery a very rare species, only four specimens, I believe,
being known at present—the type and one other in the British
Museum, one in Mr. Sharpe’s collection, and one in the Phi-
ladelphia Academy of Natural Sciences. Two other species
range from the Gold Coast to the Congo, viz. :—WM. rubri-
collis, Swainson, mistaken by Daudin and Vieillot for the

458 Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Genus Malimbus.

female of M. cristatus; and M. nitens, Gray, which seems
to be generally distributed, as it has been procured at many
points between the two places named above. MM. nigerrimus,
Vieillot, is found from Fantee to Angola, and is the least-
ornamental species of the genus, its black plumage being re-
heved by no other colour. MM. rachelie (type) was obtained
at the river Muni by Du Chaillu, and at the Gaboon; and
M. melanotis, with the widest distribution of all, has been
sent from Senegal, Gambia, and Casamanze, and also, accord-
ing to Heuglin, is found in Abyssinia. Lastly, M. rubriceps
-has been procured on the river Limpopo.

The following table gives the various distinctive characters
of the species, by which each one may be easily recognized.
I have divided them into four sections, as they seemed to
form quite naturally such subgeneric groups, retaining for the
first the term Sycobius, comprising the single crested species.
The next five, with black and red or all black plumage and
non-crested heads, I have placed under the term Ficophagus ;
while for M. rachelia, which inclines towards Euplectes in the
colour of its plumage, I propose the term Atalochrous, or
gay-coloured, and retain M. melanotis in Anaplectes.

Genus MA.LImMBUs.

SYCOBIUS.
A. Head crested.
AA. Top of head, cheeks, throat, and breast bright
red, rest of plumage black .............04: 1. ML. cristatus,

' - FICOPHAGUS.
B. Head non-crested.
BB. General plumage black.

a. Head, neck, and breast crimson.

1. Under tail-coverts crimson ..........0.-- 2, M. scutatus.
2. Under tail-coverts black... ...i;.0.425408 3. M1. cassini.
b. Occiput and sides of neck crimson .......... 4, M. rubricolls.
c. Breast alone crimson. 3.22.4. ete ee 5. M. nitens.
¢c. Entire plumage blacks Ys .nle.6 20 tals; a, 6. M. nigerrimus.
ATALOCHROUS,

vp. Black; top of head, neck, and breast orange-
red; under tail-coverts yellow............6: 7. M. rachehie.

Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Genus Malimbus. 459

ANAPLECTES,
EE. General plumage cinereous.
d. Head, throat, and breast red; chin, ear-coverts,
and lores black; edge of outer web of pri-

TULL 7 1 6 congealed A ai 8. M. melanotis,
_ é, Head entirely and throat scarlet; edge of outer
web of primaries yellow ................ 9. M. rubriceps.
SYCOBIUS.

MALIMBUS CRISTATUS.

Lanagra malimbica, Daud. Ann. du Mus. (1802) vol. i. pl.
10. fig. 1, §; Shaw, Nat. Miscell. pl. 581.

Malimbe huppé, Vieill. Analyse (1816), p. 88.

Malimbus cristatus, Vieill. Ois. Chant. (1805) pl. 42, ¢;
Sharpe, Cat. Afr. Birds, p. 60. sp. 572; Shelléy & Buckl.
Ibis, 1872, p. 289; Ussher, Ibis, 1874, p. 68. sp. 130.

Ploceus cristatus, Vieill. Enc. Méth. p. 700; id. Nouv.
Dict. d’ Hist. Nat. (1819) vol. 84. p. 129. :

Sy cobius , n.sp.? J. V. Barboza du Bocage, Jorn.
Se. Math. Lisboa, vol. 1. p. 140?

Sycobius cristatus, Gray, Gen. of Birds, vol. ii. p. 352;
Hartl. Syst. Ornith. W.Afr. (1857) p. 1382. sp. 898; Sharpe,
Ibis, 1869, p. 191. sp. 81, 1870, p. 472; Bon. Consp. Gen.
Ay. vol. 1. p. 438. sp. 1.

Sycobius mgrifrons, Hartl. Journ. fiir Ornith. 1855, p. 356.

Hab. Denkera (Ussher); Gold Coast (Shelley); Rio Boutry
(Pel); Fantee (Sharpe); Aguapim (Riis); Rio Quito (An-
chieta); River Muni (Du Chaillu) ; Congo (Perrein).

This species was first described by Daudin (J. c.) from spe-
cimens sent from the Congo by Perrein. The type is now in
the Paris Museum at the Jardin des Plantes. He called it
Tanagra malimbica, and described as the female the species
named afterwards rudricollis by Swainson. Uncoloured
figures are given of both, and descriptions in Latin and
French. Vieillot, three years afterwards, figured and de-
scribed the same specimens in his ‘ Oiseaux Chanteurs ’ under
the name of Malimbus cristatus, by which specific appellation
the species has been generally known. He merely followed
Daudin, and repeated his error in figuring Swainson’s species

PRS ne

ang eS
ee

Graha e oes aa

fy
thie |
Hil
ME
Habe soe
\ an
er
Re atats

Gees

aS,
—-_~ :

ape ee
2 a Se
Sas

zat

Sea

—

eee eee
ae ieee Ne Panes ~.
ters Oat

a
7 SSS

= — Fea =

ee rein as
Sn a

Ty aE —— nae
a mins + oe Oe eee
5 — fie er

a ee

eee Tr

—_
7
es

So —— eee Sat Fa ae ae ed
e- : = 5 ———- ~
i es

4
A
i
i
i
Lt
i
ul

wert er re eT SE SSS

:
Pine}

460 Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Genus Malimbus.

as thefemale. In the ‘ Analyse,’ where he changed the name
of the genus to Sycobius, he gives no Latin name to the
species, but calls it the Malimbe huppé; and in the ‘ Nou-
veau Dictionnaire,’ three years afterwards, he places it in the
genus Ploceus.

The young do not much resemble the adults in plumage,
and might not unnaturally be deemed to belong to different
species. :

Prof. Boccage (J.c.), describes a specimen of this genus
from Rio Quito, Cabinda, which is evidently, as he states,
in immature plumage. Judging from his description, I am
inclined to think it is one of the phases of plumage assumed
at a certain age by the young of this species.

Male. Black. Head crested. Cheeks, throat, top of head
and crest, and upper part of breast bright red. Bill and feet
black. Total length 7 inches, wing 33, tail 3, bill 2.

Female. Head not crested. Smaller than the male, dusky
black, beneath fuliginous. Bill flesh-colour.

Young. No crest. ‘Top of head, nape, side of neck, throat,
and breast crimson. Front and rest of plumage black.

Still younger. Head and neck and upper part of breast
light red, forehead blackish. Wings and back light purplish
brown. Underneath light greyish brown. Bill light brown.

FIcoPHAGUS.

MaAuimBvs scuratvs.

Sycobius scutatus, Cassin, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sc. Phil. 1849,
p- 157; id. Journ. Acad. Nat. Sc. Phil. vol. 1. p. 297, pl. 41.
figs. 1, 2, 6 9; Hartl. Syst. Ornith. W.Afr. p. 132. sp. 400;
Sharpe, Ibis, 1870, p. 472, 1869, p. 191. sp. 32; Bonap.
Consp. Gen. Av. vol. 1. p. 439. sp. 5.

Malimbus scutatus, Sharpe, Cat. Afr. Birds, p. 60. sp. 578 ;
Ussher, Ibis, 1874, p. 68. sp. 133.

Hab. Fantee (Sharpe); Denkera, Gold Coast (Ussher) ;
Rio Boutry (Pel); Sierra Leone (MacDowell); river Muni
(Du Chaillu).

This handsome species was described by Cassin as long
ago as 1849, in the ‘ Proceedings’ of the Philadelphia Aca-

tae lee ti

op erteneeh
“

Ibis .1876.P1 Xf.

U.G@Keulemans hth.

M&N.Hanhart imp.
I MALIMBUS CASSINI. 2.MRUBRICEPS

Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Genus Malimbus. 461

demy of Natural Sciences, from two pairs which were brought
from Sierra Leone by Mr. R. MacDowell. It has since been
procured at various points along the West-African coast , to the
south of the locality whence Cassin’s specimens came, and in
most of the districts appears to be rather a rare species.

Male. 'Top of head, neck, broad pectoral band, and under
tail-coverts crimson. Throat and rest of plumage black.

Female. Pectoral band and under tail-coverts crimson, all
the rest of plumage black:

Total length 52 inches, wing 38, tail 23.

Mauimsvs cassiniI. Plate XIII. f. 1.

Sycobius cassini, Elliot, Ibis, 1859, p. 892; Cassin, Journ.
Acad. Nat. Sci. Phil. 1862, p. 186.

Hab. Gaboon (Verreauz).

I described this species in ‘The Ibis’ for the year 1859
from a single specimen received from the Gaboon by the
Maison Verreaux, at that time the greatest commercial house
for natural-history specimens in Europe. It is most nearly
allied to M. scutatus, Cassin, but can always be distinguished
by the crissum being black like the general plumage. It
appears to be very rare, as I have seen but few specimens
in Europe (Cassin states that there is a specimen in the
Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences) ; and the female
is unknown. The type is in the British Museum. As it
is one of the species of this genus which has not been
figured, an excellent representation of it is given on the ac-
companying plate.

Male. Jet black. Upper part and sides of head, nape of
neck, throat, and breast rich crimson. Bill black; feet and
legs brown. ‘Total length 5} inches, wing 33, tail 23, bill ‘8,
tarsus ‘8.

MAaLIMBUS RUBRICOLLIS.

Républicain & capuchon écarlate, Temm. Cat. Cabin. Ornith.
(1807) p. 234.

Textor malimbus, Temm. ?

Ploceus rubricollis, Swain. Menag. p. 306 (1838).

Malimbus cristatus, Vieill. Ois. Chant. pl. 43, 2.

pene

ane,

yi a
i

(

462 Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Genus Malimbus.

Euplectes rufovelatus, Fras. P. Z.S. 1842, p. 142; id. Zool.
Typica, pl. 46; Sharpe, Ibis, 1870, p. 472.

Sycobius malimbus, Hartl. Syn. Ornith. W.Afr. (1857)
p- 180. sp. 8399; Sharpe, Ibis, 1870, p. 472; Bonap. Consp.
Gen. Av. vol. i. p. 438. sp. 2.

Tanagra malimbica, Daudin, Ann. du Mus. 1 p. 148,
pl. 10. fig. 2, 9 (1802).

Malimbus rufovelatus, Sharpe, Cat. Afr. Birds, p. 60.sp.570;
Ussher, Ibis, 1874, p. 68. sp. 131.

Sycobius nuchalis, Elliot, Ibis, 1859, p. 393 ; Sharpe, Ibis,
1869, p. 191, 1870, p. 472.

Hab. Denkera, Gold Coast (Ussher); Fernando Po (Fraser);
Gaboon (Du Chaillu) ; Congo (Perrein) ; Fantee (Sharpe).

Several authors have endeavoured to confer a name on this
species. I have had a shot at it myself, and, like the majority,
have been unsuccessful. As well as I can make it out, the
case stands as follows :—It was mistaken by both Daudin and
Vieillot for the female of the species called by the latter
writer Malimbus cristatus. It is undoubtedly the bird de-
scribed by Temminck in his Catalogue (/.c.) as from the Congo ;
but he does not confer any Latin name upon it. He states
that the female has the entire plumage a brownish black.
This is the only mention of the female I have met with.
Somewhere about this time, as given by writers generally,
Temminck calls the species Textor malimbus; but, so far as I
am concerned, this name cannot stand, for two reasons. One
is that I have been unable to find it published anywhere by
Temminck, and suppose his name is merely a manuscript one
in the Leyden Museum, and therefore not to be considered ;
and another is that his term is a repetition of the name of
the genus to which the bird belongs, and therefore could not
be used, even if I should find it, on account of its liability
to create confusion. Temminck seems therefore to be out
of this question entirely. Swainson, in his ‘ Menagerie,’ in
1838, regularly described the species and called it Ploceus
rubricollis ; and by this specific name the bird should hereafter
be known. In 1842 Fraser (l.c.) gave to it the name of
rufovelatus ; and in 1859 I bestowed upon the unfortunate

Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Genus Malimbus. 463

creature the term nuchalis. It is well figured by Fraser in
his ‘Zoologia Typica,’ and by Vieillot in the ‘ Oiseaux
Chanteurs.’

Adult. Black. Front, top, and back of head, and sides
of neck red. Bill and feet black. Total length 61 inches,
wing 34, tail 24, tarsus 1, bill 1.

Specimen in British Museum has the back of head and
sides of neck red, all the rest black. This may be a female,
or possibly a young male.

Ma.iMBUS NITENS.

Ploceus nitens, J. K. Gray, Zool. Misc. i. p. 6.

Sycobius nitens, G. R. Gray, Gen. of B. vol. ii. p. 352,
pl. 87; Sharpe, Ibis, 1869, p. 192. sp. 84; Bonap. Consp.
Gen. Av. vol. 1. p. 489. sp. 16.

Malimbus nitens, Hartl. Syst. Ornith. W.Afr. (1857) p.
1538. sp. 401; Sharpe, Cat. B. Afr. p. 60. sp. 571; Shelley
& Buckl. Ibis, 1872, p. 289; Ussher, Ibis, 1874, p. 68.
sp. 182.

Hab. Sierra Leone (Sabine); Aguapim (Riis); Gaboon
(Verreaux); Fantee (Sharpe); Abrobouko, Cape-Coast (Us-
sher); Gold Coast (Shelley); Rio Boutry (Pel); Cape Palma,
Calabar coast (Laurein) Paris Mus. ; river Muni (Du Chaillu).

M. nitens was first described by Dr. Gray (/.c.). It is
peculiar among the members of this genus by the squami-
form feathers of the head and neck, resembling somewhat in
texture and colour those of the members of the genus Manu-
codia. It is a clearly defined species, the black plumage and
red pectoral band readily serving to distinguish it from the
other birds of this group. Like the rest of the members of
this section, it appears to be scattered along the West-African
coast from Sierra Leone to the Congo, being nowhere very
abundant. There is nothing in its synonymy calling for
any especial comment, the species never having received a
second appellation. é

Jet black. Pectoral band crimson. Bill black on basal
half, remainder yellowish. Feet black. Feathers of head
and neck shining purplish black. Total length 5% inches,
wing 33, tail 23, bill on top #. |

wt
i
moe
<7
I.
i
+9
‘a
iw
it
‘a i
\
Wi
i
Sa
iit
a
‘aia

hii

it
ie

464 Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Genus Malimbus.

Ma.iMBUS NIGERRIMUS.
Ploceus nigerrimus, Vieill. Enc. Méth. p. 700; id. Nouv.
Dict. d’Hist. Nat. (1819) vol. 34. p. 180; Hartl. Journ. fur
Ornith. 1854, p. 411.

Sycobius nigerrimus, Hartl. Syst. Ornith. W.Afr. (1857)
p. 183. sp. 402; Gray, Gen. of Birds, vol. 11. p. 352; Bonap.
Consp. Gen. Av. vol. i. p. 439. sp. 7.

Ploceus niger, Swains. Menag. p. 306 (1838).

Malimbus nigerrimus, Sharpe, Cat. Afr. Birds, p. 60. sp.
574; id. Ibis, 1872, p. 72. sp. 250; Ussher, Ibis, 1874, p.
68. sp. 184.

Hab. Cape Lopez (Verreaux); Gaboon (Du Chaillu); An-
gola (Perrein); Fantee, scarce (Ussher).

Ploceus nigerrimus of Vieillot (J. c.) is the only species
of Malimbus which has a plumage of one uniform colour, un-
relieved by the crimson and orange which render its relatives
so conspicuous and attractive. It is apparently distributed
along the African coast from Fantee to Angola, as it has been
obtained at various points between these districts.

The adult of this species has the entire plumage jet-black.
Total length 94 inches, wing 33, tail 3, bill along culmen #.

Young. Head and back dark olive-brown, each feather with
a central line of black. Rumprufous brown. Cheeks, throat,
and upper part of breast and flanks olive-yellow ; rest of under-
parts bright yellow. Under tail-coverts dark buff. Wings
and tail dark purplish brown. Edges of secondaries yellow.
Total length 64 inches, wing 34, tail 34, bill on culmen #.

ATALOCHROUS.

Ma.iMBUS RACHELIA.

Sycobius rachelie, Cassin, Proc. Acad. Nat. Scien. Phil.
1857, p. 386; id. Journ. Ac. Nat. Sc. Phil. 1862, pl. 28.
fig. 3; Hartl. Syst. Ornith. W.Afr. p. 265. sp. 749.

Malimbus rachelie, Sharpe, Cat. Afr. Birds, p. 60. sp. 575.

Hab. River Muni (Du Chaillu); Gaboon (Walker).

This, the handsomest species of Malimbus, was first de-
scribed by Mr. Cassin (J. ¢.) from specimens obtained by Du
Chaillu on the river Muni. It is quite different in the ar-

Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Genus Malimbus. 465

rangement of its colours from all the species of this genus ;
and in the way the bright hues of the breast extend to the
flanks it resembles somewhat the species of Euplectes. The
two examples in the Academy of Natural Sciences at Phila-
delphia, and one in Mr. Sharpe’s collection, are, I believe,
the only ones of this beautiful bird that have as yet been
obtained. It constitutes the subgenus Atalochrous, accord-
ing to the manner in which I have divided this group of
birds.

Male. Top of head bright reddish orange, growing paler
on sides of neck. Throat and cheeks black. Neck in front
and breast orange-red, changing into bright yellow on the
sides. Upper part of body, wings, tail, and abdomen black.
Under tail-coverts yellow; under wing-coverts black. Bill
bluish black; feet paler. Total length 54 inches, wing 33,
tail 2.

Young male. Similar to the male, but the plumage less
bright, and the reddish orange of the crown mixed with black.

ANAPLECTES.

MALIMBUS MELANOTIS.

Ploceus melanotis, Lafr. Rev. de Zool. 1889, p. 20; id.
Mag. de Zool. 1839, pl. 7; Hartl. Syst. Ornith. W.Afr.
(1857) p. 183.

Hyphantornis erythrocephalus, Rupp. Syst. Uebers. Vog.
Nord-Ost-Afr. p. 71; Gray, Gen. Birds, p. 351.

Sycobius melanotis, Bonap. Consp. Gen. Av. vol. 1. p. 438.
sp. 3; Horsf. & Moore, Cat. B. E.Ind. Co. (1856-58) p. 520.
sp. 790.

Ploceus pyrrhocephalus, Heugl. Journ. fiir Ormith. 1864,
pp. 247, 272, 273.

Ploceus hematocephalus, P. Wirt. Naumannia, 1857, p. 433.

Hab. Senegal (Lafresnaye) ; Gambia (Lesson); Casamanze
(Verreaux); Abyssinia (Horsfield & Moore).

The present rare bird is peculiar amongst this group by
departing from the usual style of plumage, and, instead of
possessing black and red colours, takes almost the other ex-
treme and presents itself to us in a grey and red dress, be-

466 Mr. D. G. Elliot on the Genus Malimbus.

coming nearly white on the lower parts. It was described by
Lafresnaye in the ‘ Revue de Zoologie’ for 1839, and a figure
given in the ‘ Magasin de Zoologie’ of the same year. The
type is now in the collection of the Natural-History Society
of Boston, United States. Lafresnaye’s specimen came from
Senegal; but it has also been procured on the Gambia
and at Casamanze. .

Upper part greyish, beneath ashy white, abdomen the
same. Under tail-coverts whitish. Head, throat, and breast
red. Ear-coverts, chin, and loral space black. Bill red.
Feet flesh-colour. Wings greyish brown, outer webs bor-
dered with red. ‘Tail pale brown, edges of outer webs bor-
dered with red. ‘Total length 5} inches, wing 334, tail 24,
bill on culmen 4.

MALIMBUS RUBRICEPS. Plate XITI. f. 2.

Hyphantornis rubriceps, Sundey. Ofvers. Kongl. Vetensk.
Akad. Forh. 1850, p. 97.

Hab. River Limpopo (Wahlberg).

A typical specimen of this very good species in the collec-
tion of Mr. Sharpe, received by him from Prof. Sundevall,
and collected on the river Limpopo by Wahlberg, fully
exhibits the perfect distinctness of this bird from M. me-
lanotis. The chief differences that are at once perceptible
are the absence of the black cheek-mark, the edges of the
outer webs of the primaries and rectrices being yellow in-
stead of red, and the head and breast being scarlet instead of
vermilion. ‘The figure on the accompanying plate well re-
presents the bird.

The male has the entire head, neck, throat, and breast
bright scarlet. Back and wings ashy brown, outer edges of
secondaries and primaries bright yellow. Centre of the
mantle washed with pale vermilion. Rump pale ash. Tail
ashy brown, edges of outer webs bright yellow. Entire
underparts pure white. Bill pale horn-colour. Total length
5% inches, wing 34, tail 24, bill on culmen }.

Notes on Mr, R.-B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres. 467

XLV.—Notes on a ‘Catalogue of the Accipitres in the
British Museum,’ by R. Bowdler Sharpe (1874). By J. H.
GURNEY.

[Continued from p. 376. ]

THe continent of Africa is the home of three Buteonine
species (Buteo auguralis, Buteo augur, and Buteo jakal) which
are included by Mr. Sharpe in the genus Buteo, but which
appear to me to form a natural subgeneric group, to which
the name of Pterolestes, proposed by the late Professor Sun-
devall*, may be conveniently applied,

The first two of these species are intertropical in their
habitat, being natives of Abyssinia and of some of the adja-
cent countries, and having also been obtained in West Africa
within the Portuguese territory of Benguela.

So far as I am aware, nothing is known as to the range of
these two species in the countries which intervene between these
far-distant localities, neither is it known whether either spe-
cies occurs elsewhere in West Africa; but it may be desirable
to record the circumstance of the Zoological Society of London
having possessed, some years years since, two living examples
of Pterolestes auguralis which were known to have been ob-
tained in West Africa, though from what portion of the West-
African coast was, I believe, never ascertained. Neither of
these interesting birds lived long in confinement ; and, unfor-
tunately, neither of them was preserved ; but the sternum of
one, a male, was added to the collection in the Norwich Mu-
seum, which also possesses an example of this Buzzard said
to have been obtained in Nubia. As this species is very rare
in collections, and as its dimensions are not given in Mr.
Sharpe’s work, I may here mention the principal measure-
ments of the specimen at Norwich; these are—wing from
carpal joint 13°9 inches, tarsus 2°8, middle toe s. u, 1°5.

Mr. Sharpe’s description of Pterolestes auguralis in his
Catalogue is limited to a somewhat brief note supplied by
Dr. Finsch; but he has subsequently published further parti-

* Vide Addenda to Mr. Sharpe’s Catalogue, p. 458; also Sundevall ia
(Efy.k. Vet. Akad. Forh. 1874, No. 2, p. 27.
SER. III.— VOL. Vi. 2K

468 Mr. J. H. Gurney’s Notes on

culars, derived from Professor Barboza du Bocage and from
Count Salvadori, in the second edition of Mr. Layard’s ‘ Birds
of South Africa,’ p. 27.

With regard to Pterolestes augur, I have to remark that
in the stage described by Mr. Sharpe under the head of
“adult male,’ but which I have no reason to suppose is
limited to the male sex, the throat is sometimes pure white.
This circumstance is not noted in Mr. Sharpe’s description ;
but such a specimen from Abyssinia is represented in Rup-
pell’s ‘Neue Wirbelthiere, pl. 16. fig. 1, and a similar ex-
ample from Benguela is in the Lisbon Museum. ‘The Nor-
wich Museum possesses an Abyssinian specimen, also in this
stage, in which the throat is white, with the exception of
three narrow blackish streaks, of which one is mesial and two
lateral.

The remarkable phase of plumage in this Buzzard, in which
all the underparts are black, is described by Mr. Sharpe
under the heads of “ old male” and “ old female;” but in
Mr. Blanford’s ‘Observations in Abyssinia,’ that traveller
remarks, at p. 297, ““I am rather of opinion, with Ruppell,
that the dark-coloured birds are young, and not a melanoid —

variety. I shot two black specimens, one Mae ee imma-
ture, the other apparently a bird of the year.”

Judging from these remarks of Mr. Blanford’s, and from
such specimens as I have been able to examine, I should
suppose the dark plumage to be an occasional melanistic
phase incident both to young and to adult specimens ; cer-
tainly many immature birds do not exhibit it. The youngest
specimen in the Norwich Museum agrees generally with the
description given by Mr. Sharpe of the “ young” plumage ;
but the upper tail-coverts are dark brown, and are not tipped
with rufous; some of the tibial feathers show conspicuous
though irregular longitudinal streaks of dark brown; and the
abdomen is similarly streaked throughout, but more profusely
than the tibize.

A slightly older specimen, in the same collection, agrees
more closely with Mr. Sharpe’s description, but also shows
the brown markings on the thighs, though not on the abdo-

Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres. 469

men ; in this bird new'feathers are appearing on the mantle
of the dark hue indicative of adult plumage. A third speci-
men shows a similar appearance on the back, and is also
beginning to assume the rufous tail; in this example the
tibial feathers are white, much mingled with rufous. The
two last-named specimens are evidently in a state of change
from the immature dress to that designated by Mr. Sharpe
as the plumage of the “ adult male.”

Ruppell’s plate of his “ Buteo hydrophilus” (Neue Wir-
belthiere, pl. 17) probably represents two immature speci-
mens of P. augur—that marked “ Fig. 2” being apparently
the younger of the two, and perhaps partially melanistic.

There remains but one other species of the subgenus Piero-
lestes requiring consideration, the South-African P. jakal.
Mr. Sharpe, in his description of the “ adult male,” has the
following sentence:—‘‘ Centre of chest whitish or rufous
white, more or less mottled with black, being the remains of
immaturity, as also are the white edgings to the feathers of
the abdomen and thighs, and rufous on the under tail-coverts.”
Having examined many skins of this Buzzard, and having
also observed it in confinement, I feel certain that the ap-
pearances indicated in this passage are not “the remains of
immaturity,” but are characteristic of the fully adult normal
plumage of this species.

Mr. Sharpe alludes, both at page 176 of his Catalogue,
and at p. 29 of the second edition of Mr. Layard’s ‘ Birds of
South Africa,’ to the occasional occurrence of specimens of
P. jakal in which the underparts are entirely black, as in the
melanistic form of P. augur. Such specimens must, I appre-
hend, be very rare, as none such have come under my notice,
and as no mention of this phase of plumage is made by Mr.
Layard in the first edition of his work, though he found this
species “very common throughout the colony” of the Cape
of Good Hope.

I now proceed to the consideration of the genus Leuco-
pternis, which has been merged by Mr. Sharpe in that of Uru-
bitinga; but I think it more convenient to use both these
generic names as indicating two distinct groups, which are

2K2

|
Bhi
ipl:
i
f
he
fi
}
4
1
iF

ee
—— :

Se RI ey

pr ee

—— ee

* ee oe SS PR . : - —— = Jeet SR ers.
Ca ITS DRONES = CR ear a SS A EET OEE

IOS GENO A DS BOT
SS ee a = g
= —s oto
<2 =: re! es
el a = = 5
=e YS su os

—

ih
|
he
Hi
t
i

470 Mr. J. H. Gurney’s Notes on

naturally separated by the totally different character of their
immature plumage—the one group, to which I would restrict
the title of Urubitinga, consisting of U. zonura, U. anthra-
cina, and U. gundlachi (if the latter be really distinct), and
the other, for which I would retain the name of Leucopternis,
consisting of the remaining species included by Mr. Sharpe
in his amalgamated genus*.

Leaving the restricted genus Urubditinga for future consi-
deration, I now propose to make a few remarks on some
species of the genus Leucopternis, based upon specimens in
the Norwich Museum, and upon others very kindly lent to
me by Messrs. Salvin and Godman.

Commencing with that beautiful species, L. ghiesbreghti, I
may observe that the proportion of black which mingles with
the snowy white of its general plumage is greatest in young
birds, and appears gradually to diminish as their age in-~
creases. |

The specimen described by Mr. Sharpe as “ adult’ appears
to me to retain a greater proportion of black in its plumage
than is the case in some still older specimens; a very adult
female in the collection of Messrs. Salvin and Godman differs
from Mr. Sharpe’s description in the following particulars :
the greater wing-coverts are entirely white, and the primary-
coverts are broadly tipped with white; the primaries are
white above the emargination, as are the secondaries through-
out, with the exception of a very few sparse and irregular
remnants of black here and there. |

The specimen figured and described by Du Bus (Esquisses
Ornithologiques, pl. 1) appears also to be more completely
adult than that described by Mr. Sharpe.

As Mr. Sharpe does not mention the first plumage of this
species, I may add that a decidedly immature example in the

* Mr. Ridgway, in his recently published and very valuable ‘ Studies
of the American Falconide,’ whilst recognizing the distinction between
the genera Urubitinga and Leucopternis, includes in the former, at p. 172,
two species (schistacea absolutely, and plumbea conjecturally) which I,
following Mr. Salvin (Ibis, 1872, p. 243), refer to Lewcopternis, having no
evidence that either of them exhibits when young the remarkable imma-

ture plumage which is characteristic of Urubitinga as distinguished from
Leucopternis.

Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres. 471

collection of Messrs. Salvin and Godman differs from the
adult plumage in the following particulars :—The feathers on
the crown of the head have faint brown shaft-marks, which
become broader on the back of the neck, and especially at
the nape, as well as darker, the marks on the neck being
slaty black, which is also the colour of the upper ear-coverts ;
some of the scapulars have black shaft-marks, and one of the
outer scapulary feathers also shows two black marks on the

external web; the whole of the exterior surface of the wings

is black, with the following exceptions: the feathers form-
ing the wing-coverts are edged and tipped with white, and
most of those in the greater and middle coverts are also trans-
versely barred with white ; the secondaries are blackish brown,
transversely barred with black, but tipped with white, and
also edged with white on the inner web, the innermost secon-
dary showing, in addition, a small white mark on the outer
web; the outermost tertials resemble the inner secondaries,
but are rather more spotted with white; the remaining ter-
tials are white, with transverse black bars.

The character of the black subterminal bar on the upper
surface of the tail varies somewhat in different individuals.
A specimen in the collection of Messrs. Salvin and Godman,
which still retains traces of immature plumage, though to all
appearance decidedly older than that last described, exhibits
a remarkable variation in this respect: in this example the
two central rectrices are entirely white, and on the other fea-
thers of the tail the subterminal band is merely represented
by a black spot on each side of the shaft; these spots are well
marked on some of the rectrices, but on the outer pair, and
also on the pair next the central ones, they are almost ob-
solete; indeed, on one of the last-named feathers only one
spot is visible, the opposite web being an unbroken white.
The remaining plumage of this specimen does not appear to
me to be in any way abnormal.

The next species to which I propose to refer is Lewcopternis
palliata, Mr. Sharpe’s description of which appears to have
been taken from an immature specimen, as he describes it as
having “the feathers of the back and scapulars white at base,

ang renga ent a

ey
os

tz
can cer Ee

oe ee ae

rh
} 4
}
i
c t

cae

t
ie |
bis |
teu
if

7
ai

472 Mr. J..H. Gurney’s Notes on

tipped with white, and irregularly spotted or barred with the
same.” These white bars and tips become less numerous as
the bird advances in age; and the whole appearance of the
mantle in consequence becomes more uniform and more cha-
racterized by an unbroken slate-colour.

The authors of ‘ Exotic Ornithology,’ who figure at pl. 49
of that work a specimen of this Buzzard, observe that “in
very old birds it is possible that the white edgings to the fea-
thers of the back and wings, which are more apparent in
some specimens than in others, may wholly disappear.” Such
is, in great measure, the case with the most adult example
in the Norwich Museum, in which the white edgings have
almost entirely disappeared from the mantle, and, with the
exception of about four of the scapular feathers, only remain
on the secondaries and tertials.

It should, however, be observed that the small coverts along
the ridge of the wing, between the body and the carpal joint,
which in the immature plumage are slaty black edged with
white, are in the adult pure white for about half an inch in
breadth from the ridge, where they merge into slaty black.

Mr. Sharpe describes the head and neck as “‘ pure white ;”
but in the two adult specimens in the Norwich Museum the
crown of the head and back of the neck show a very fine
blackish shaft-mark on each feather ; in a younger bird in
the same collection these marks are broader, especially on
the nape, and for the most part of a browner hue.

The next species which I have to notice 1s L. albicollis, a
Buzzard nearly allied to L. palliata, but readily distinguish-
able, in addition to other characteristics, by the pure white
of its lower back, rump, and upper tail-coverts.

This species, which is figured by Temminck in Pl. Col.
pl. 9, under the name of Falco pecilonotus, is there repre-
sented with the head and interscapular region of a pure white,
with the exception of a black supercilium; but Mr. Sharpe,
probably taking his description from a younger bird, speaks
of the head (except the sides of the face) as “ white streaked
with black,’ and of the interscapulary feathers as black
“much varied with white bases and margins, sometimes also

Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres. 473

barred with white on the outer web.” Mr. Ridgway, in his
“Studies of the American Falconide,’ to which I have already
referred, describes this species (at p. 176) as having the
‘“‘pileum and nape sometimes streaked” with black, and
sometimes “immaculate.” A specimen from Cayenne, in the
collection of Messrs. Salvin and Godman, agrees with Mr.
Sharpe’s description in this respect, but also has the white
feathers of the hinder head conspicuously variegated by broad
slaty-black shaft-marks. Of two specimens in the Norwich
Museum, one closely resembles the Cayenne example just
mentioned ; but the other has the shaft-marks on the crown of
the head narrower and less conspicuous, as though they were
in process of gradually disappearing: this specimen is from
Quito, and is the most westerly example of this species which
has come under my notice; the locality of the other specimen
at Norwich is doubtful. |

Mr. Ridgway thus describes the markings on the tail of
this Buzzard :—“ Tail white at the base and end, the middle
portion black; this black band of variable width, sometimes
occupying the greater portion of the tail, but in a specimen
from Bogota restricted to a subterminal band about 2°50
inches wide.” Mr. Sharpe’s description appears to have been
taken from a specimen in which the tail resembles the bird
described by Mr. Ridgway from Bogota; but Messrs. Salvin
and Godman’s specimen from Cayenne and the two in the
Norwich Museum have the markings on the tail in accordance
with the first description supplied by Mr. Ridgway.

The following is a detailed description of these markings
in the Cayenne specimen above referred to :—All the rec-
trices, save the two outermost pairs, are entirely black, ex-
cept a narrow white basal band, which is hidden by the upper
tail-coverts, and excepting also a white terminal band, extend-
ing across all the rectrices, and about 1:3 inch in breadth;
on the outer pair the basal white band is visible for 1°5 inch
below the tip of the upper tail-coverts, as it is also on the
next pair; but on these it is imperfect, beimg intersected by
black barring on the outer web; the under surface of the
tail is white, with a central transverse black band 2°5 inches
in width.

a ee
7 ak “

v=:

Se SS ee

ares

=P:

gO eS ee aed
esr ee 5 eR eee

-—

——

— Seat Stat

——

'
4
b
;
i
i
’
;
.

474 Mr. J..H. Gurney’s Notes on

In the two specimens in the Norwich Museum the basal
white band on the tail is somewhat less narrow, being about
‘75 of an inch wide on the central rectrices, and increasing
towards the outermost rectrices, on which the white base is
of the width of 4 inches.

Another nearly allied but decidedly smaller species, L. la-
cernulata, presents a somewhat more marked variation between
the adult and immature plumages than occurs either in L. pal-
liata or in L. albicollis. In an adult specimen in the collection
of Messrs. Salvin and Godman, from Rio Janeiro, the upper
surface of the head is of a delicate grey, paler than the tint
of the hind neck, but not absolutely white as in the speci-
men described by Mr. Sharpe; also, in this example the
white bars on the upper tail-coverts are not visible, except
when the feathers are disarranged. With regard to the ordi-
nary immature plumage, I may remark that it differs from
the adult, not only in the particulars mentioned by Mr.
Sharpe, but also in the ground-colour of the entire mantle
being of a much blacker hue than in the adult, and with a
less tinge of grey. One specimen in Messrs. Salvin and
Godman’s collection, from Bahia, apparently a very young
bird, further differs both from the second or ordinary immature
plumage and also from the adult in having all the feathers of
the wing-coverts narrowly tipped with rufous brown, except
those nearest the carpal joint, which are similarly tipped with
white, the scapulars and interscapulars are also tipped with
rufous brown, but less conspicuously than the wing-coverts.
In this specimen the lower part of the black portion of the
tail is crossed on the outer rectrices by six irregular white
bars; on the other rectrices these become fewer in number as
the centre of the tail 1s approached, and the central rectrices
show but two such bars, of which the upper one is nearly
obsolete.

Messrs. Salvin and Godman also possess a specimen from
Demerara of another allied species, L. melanops, in immature
plumage of similar character to the above; in this bird the
entire mantle has the feathers narrowly tipped with rufous
brown, as in the first stage of L. lacernulata; this immature

Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres. 475

specimen of LZ. melanops also differs from the adult in having
two white transverse bars on the tail besides the white tip ;
the lower bar of the two measures ‘7 of an inch in width, the
upper bar, which is less perfect, is somewhat narrower.

In this specimen all the under surface is white, slightly
tinged with buff, and the white portions of the plumage of
the head and neck are also similarly tinted.

Mr. Ridgway, in his description of the adult of this species
(‘Studies of the American Falconide,’ p. 177), says that these
parts sometimes exhibit “ a beautiful salmon-pink tinge, espe-
cially under the wing.”

I am happy to learn that the very fine series of Buzzards of
the genus Leucopiernis possessed by Messrs. Salvin and God-
man has very recently been enriched by an additional speci-
men of each of those very rare species L. plumbea and L.
semiplumbea, both obtained from Veragua. Mr. Salvin,
writing to me respecting this specimen of L. semiplumbea,
adds the following information, which, by his permission, I
here transcribe: it “seems to be a younger bird than I have
yet seen of this species; the colour of the upper surface is
darker and not so clear plumbeous; there are some well-
defined longitudinal streaks on the upper breast ; the central
tail-feathers have two instead of a single band; and the wings
are more strongly barred beneath at their extremities.”? Two
other specimens of L. semiplumbea have also been recently
added to the same collection, from the province of Antioquia,
in the United States of Columbia, a new and more southern
locality for this species*.

With regard to the remaining species of the genus Leuco-
pternis, I have nothing to add to the information contained
in Mr. Sharpe’s volumet+; I therefore pass on to the consi-

* In one of the specimens of L. semiplumbea in the collection of Messrs,
Salyin and Godman the upper white caudal band, indicative of imma-
turity, has entirely disappeared, with the exception of a single small white
spot still remaining on one of the central rectrices; the white bars on the
tail of immature birds of this species are of a less clear white than on
those of the adult.

+ Since the above was written I have had an opportunity of examining
the very interesting and apparently distinct new Leucopternis, lately ob-

eG TTS

Seta ee oc

eae
<A ORS

476 Mr. J. H. Gurney’s Notes on

deration of the remaining Buteonine genera, amongst which
it will, I think, be convenient to refer first to that very in-
teresting newly discovered form which has received from its
first describer, Mr. Ridgway, the appellation of Onychotes
grubert.

As this species has been accidentally omitted from the index
to Mr. Sharpe’s volume, I may mention that his account of
it will be found at page 158 of his Catalogue; and I may add
that a fuller description, with woodcuts of the type specimen
and of some of its details, is given at pages 252 to 254 of
vol. iii. of the ‘ History of North-American Land-Birds,’ by
Messrs. Baird, Brewer, and Ridgway. Since the publication
of that work a second specimen has come to light; and a very
interesting account of both will be found in Mr. Ridgway’s
‘Studies of the American Falconide,’ p. 1384, from which I
extract the following remarks :—‘ This Buteonine form has
no very near relative among the American Falconide, nor,
indeed, among those of the Old World * * * * General form
and size most similar to that of species of Rupornis and As-
turina * * * * * The general aspect of this peculiar Hawk
is that of the smaller short-winged Buteones of tropical
America.”’

Mr. Ridgway describes the type specimen as “‘ everywhere
dark greyish brown,’ and the second example as “above
chiefly greyish brown, beneath ochraceous white,” and adds
further particulars in detail respecting both examples, for
which I must refer my reader to Mr. Ridgway’s own pages ;
but I may here transcribe his measurements of these two
specimens, the only ones at present known :—‘“‘ Wing 10°10-
11°50 inches, tail 6°50-—7°30, culmen about ‘80, tarsus 2°70-
2°80, middle toe 1:45—1-60, posterior claw 1, its digit :80.”

Both individuals are believed to have been obtained in
California; but many years having elapsed since they were
originally procured, though not then recognized as distinct,

tained by Messrs. Salvin and Godman from Ecuador, and described by
the former gentleman under the title of Z. occidentalis in the present num-
ber of this Journal ( posted, p. 496),

Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres. 477

it is not now possible to ascertain the exact locality of either
example.

The next genus to which I propose to allude is Buteola.
Mr. Ridgway, in his account of Onychotes gruberi, from which
I have just quoted, speaks of that species as agreeing “ very
nearly in size with Buteola minuta and brachyura;?’ but Mr.
Sharpe treats Buieola minuta as a synonym of B. brachyura ;
and in this I think he is correct, as Von Pelzeln’s original
description of the Buteo minutus of Natterer’s Brazilian Cata-
logue appears to be founded on two normal immature speci-
mens and one melanistic adult of B. brachyura.

Von Pelzeln’s reason for considering Natterer’s B. minutus
to be distinct from Vieillot’s B. brachyurus is that the type
of the latter is described by Pucheran (Rev. et Mag. d’Orn.
1850, p. 86) as being “ remarquable par la briéveté de la queue
et par suite par l’allongement des ailes, qui depassent d’un
pouce les rectrices ;” but as in ordinary specimens of B. bra-
chyura the wings do not reach to the tip of the tail, I think
it probable that the peculiarity observed: by Von Pelzeln in
the type specimen may be due to some defect in preparing
or mounting the skin, as it often happens that the apparent
relative length of the tail as compared with the wings is either
unnaturally curtailed or extended through lack of care or
skill on the part of the taxidermist.

The “ distinct central tubercle” in the nostril which dis-
tinguishes the genus Buteola (vide Sharpe’s Catalogue, p. 158)
very frequently disappears in the process of preserving the
skin; and when this has happened it is not always very easy
to distinguish at first sight between melanistic specimens of
Buteo brachyura and similarly coloured examples of Buteo fu-
liginosus*. It appears to me that the former, when newly
moulted, are blacker than B. fuliginosus on all parts except
the interspaces between the dark transverse bars on the tail,
which are usually greyer, but sometimes partly white; when,
however, the plumage has been somewhat worn, it assumes
everywhere, but especially on the breast, abdomen, tibiz, and

* On the subject of the specific validity of Buteo fuliginosus as distin-
guished from Buteo swainsont, vide antea, p. 235.

ee .

}

478 Mr. J. H. Gurney’s Notes on

wing-coverts, the peculiar dark brown tint which is also cha-
racteristic of the adult B. fuliginosus.

Messrs. Salvin and Godman have kindly lent me a melan-
istic specimen of Buteola brachyura from Veragua, killed
whilst moulting, and retaining a sufficient portion of the old
plumage in great measure to verify this remark, which is
further borne out by another melanistic specimen belonging
to the same gentlemen, and also obtained in Veragua, in which
the moult appears, from the character of the plumage, to have
taken place some months before the bird was killed. The first
of these specimens has the interspaces on the upper part of
the outer rectrices white on both webs; but this is not a con-
stant character, and is therefore not to be relied on. Both the
above-mentioned specimens retain the white forehead, which
is conspicuous in normal examples, and which is probably
constantly characteristic of the adults of this species, though
not of immature specimens. Another and, J believe, a con-
stant distinction is, that in Buteola brachyura the dark trans-
verse bars on the tail are more strictly horizontal than in the
adult birds of Buteo fuliginosus, in which the central portion
of these bars is lower than the extremities, as shown in the
figure of this species in the ‘Transactions of the Zoological
Society,’ vol. iv. pl. 62, and in the ‘ Birds of North America,’
by Baird, Cassin, and Lawrence, pl. 15. fig. 1. I will add
one other element of diagnosis between these two Buzzards :
the space between the tip of the longest tertial and of the
longest primary, though somewhat variable, is, on the average,
decidedly less in Buteola brachyura than in Buteo fuliginosus.
The following tables will serve to illustrate this peculiarity,
and also to show how closely the two species approach each -
other in their general dimensions :—

Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres. 479 if
Buteola brachyura. ii
Space from fH
tip of ter- i
Wing from tials to tip Middle Pit
carpal joint. of primaries. Tarsus. toe 6. u. ht
; inches. inches. inches. inches. iy
Specimens in the Norwich is i
Museum. iL
Normal adult from Guatema- Wit
la, supposed gh gcc yeu.. van gees 3°] 271 16 |
Ditto from Brazil, supposed g =—-11°7 3°3 2°] 15
Specimens in Collection of
Messrs. Salvin and G'odman.
Normal adult from Para,
marked by collector 6 .. 11° 3:1 2:2 1-4
Melanistic adult from Vera-
gua,marked bycollector ¢ 11:3 3°5 2-9 1:4
Ditto from Veragua, supposed
iy, Ste ee eid le ce hs 11:2 3°4 2:2 14
Normal immature from Rio
de Janeiro, supposed 9 ... 12°7 3°3 2°5 1:8
Buteo fuliginosus. i
Specimens in the Norwich He
Museum. a
Type specimen from Tamau- a
lipas, N. Mexico, appa- Bi
Ponitimindultsecerce. es. % 12°6 4] 2-05 15 ni
A similarly coloured speci- Hi]
men from Venezuela .... 18-2 3-6 9:35 16 ve
A similarly coloured speci- A
men, but with slight mix- 4
ture of ochreous on the A
underparts, from Jalapa, me
Moexionern arte lta. 12:2 4-5 2-2 16 i

Fe i eh

Specimens in Collection of
Messrs. Salvin and Godman.

a
atte

a ee

Specimen closely resembling
the type, from Vera Paz,
ATUATOINA LA oo sieve, 22s 5's <a 13-1 45 2:2 16

Immature specimen from Tin-
ta, Peru, marked ‘ rs col-
lector . Baie chee Veit oa oe Lote 39 2°5 1:

mes

— =

=
ZR

Pane
evict)

= $F

I
Sates ae

Fe a a ae

-- — me
See

4 ie
La He
‘hat
Oey }
Bat) |
| 4

}
‘
{
t
¢
4
+
at
f

eee SD EE OE

ealtsins SS
we sew Se ee as Se

AE Sigg hs RAEI Ta tag tg an ge —.

480 Mr. J. H. Gurney’s Notes on '

The immature specimen of Buteola brachyura from Rio de
Janeiro, included in the first of these tables, agrees with Mr.
Sharpe’s description of that species in its immature plumage ;
the bird from Tinta, which I believe to be an immature Buteo
Suliginosus, and which I have so included in the second table,
bears a considerable general resemblance to the immature
Buteola brachyura, from which, however, it differs in having
all the feathers of the underparts, except those of the throat
and crissum, which are immaculate, embellished with a con-
spicuous dark longitudinal shaft-mark of varying breadth,
these being narrowest on the upper breast and abdonien,
broader on the lower breast, and occupying almost the en-
tirety of each feather on the flanks; on the tibize the shaft-
marks are expanded into a double transverse bar across each
feather ; the transverse dark bars on the upper surface of the
tail in this specimen are ten, whereas in the immature Bu-
teola brachyura they are but seven.

The genus Buteola is followed in Mr. Sharpe’s work (and,
I think, very naturally so) by Asturina; and I would refer my
readers to some valuable remarks on this genus by Messrs.
Sclater and Salvin in the P. Z.S. for 1869, p.129. As there
pointed out, this genus “ may be separated into three groups,
as follows :—

(1) The species allied to A. nitida, of which there appear
to be two representive forms, one... . A. plagiata, the other
the true A. nitida....

(2) ‘The species allied to A. magnirostris, which is the type
of the genus Rupornis of Kaup....

*“(3) The isolated species A. leucorrhoa, which appears to be
a true Asturina in structure, but in plumage forcibly calls to
mind the Buteo | Buteola| brachyurus, Vieill.”

The similarity of plumage referred to in the last paragraph
of the passage just quoted is especially apparent when the
adult A. leucorrhoa is compared with the melanistic phase of
the adult B. brachyura; and its existence will.be a sufficient
reason for dealing first with this species in our consideration
of the genus Asturina. |

I suspect that the measurements given by Mr. Sharpe as

Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres. 48]

those of the adult female have, in fact, been taken from a °
large male, as a female from Venezuela in the Norwich Mu-
seum is considerably larger in the wing, measuring 10:2 inches
from the carpal joint.

This female is nearly adult, but retains some interesting
remains of immature plumage, the axillary feathers being alter-
nately barred transversely with white and blackish brown,
whilst the tips of these feathers exhibit a guttate shaft-mark
of the latter colour, surrounded by an edging of yellowish
white; the tibiz are almost entirely black on their external
face, but on the opposite side of the limb are transversely
barred with irregular alternate markings of blackish brown
and buff; aslight tinge of rufous is just appearing at the lowest
extremity of the tibial feathers ; the upper surface of the tail
still shows two ashy brown bars; and the lining of the wing
near its external edge exhibits a greater proportion of black
than is to be found in older birds. With these exceptions,
and that of a sight fulvous tint upon some of the feathers of
the breast, the specimen has completed the assumption of the
adult dress.

The next group to which I would refer, and to which I
would restrict Kaup’s subgeneric name of Rupornis, consists
of the following species, or, as they may perhaps be more ap-
propriately termed, geographical races :—

The most southern of these is R. ee inhabiting
S.E. Brazil, Paraguay, Buenos Ayres, and the Argentine
Republic.

Mr. Sharpe has included Bolivia in the localities which he
gives for this species; but the Bolivian race appears to be di-
stinct, and, subsequently to the publication of Mr. Sharpe’s
volume, has been so described by Messrs. Sclater and Salvin
under the name of “ Asturina saturata”’ in the P. Z. 8. 1876,
p. 357.

A somewhat more northerly range characterizes R. nat-
tereri, which appears to be very generally distributed through-
out Brazil, extending westward to Peru; whilst the most

* The iris in this species has been recorded by Mr. Lee as being of a
“very pale amber-colour ” (vide Ibis, 1873, p. 136).

482 Mr. J. H. Gurney’s Notes on

northern of the South-American races, R. magnirostris, ex-
| tends across the continent from Columbia to Guiana.
ene" “Many years ago I saw a specimen of Rupornis from the
island of Martinique, which I considered to belong to this
species; but I am not sure that it may not have been really ©
referable to one or other of the two Central-American races
to which I have now to allude, and which, at the period
to which I refer, had not been meee from R. mag-
nirostris. |

Mr. Sharpe gives but one North-American species of Ru-
pornis, viz. R. ruficauda, of Sclater and Salvin, extending
from Panamato Mexico; but Mr. Ridgway has separated the
race found to the north of Guatemala under the title of “ var.
griseocauda,’ mainly distinguished from R. ruficauda by the
absence of rufous colouring from the tail. As mentioned in —
the article on R. ruficauda in ‘ Exotic Ornithology,’ p. 176,
Panama specimens are decidedly more rufous on the tail than
those found in Guatemala, the latter being, in this respect,
intermediate between the phase of colouring existing in Pa-
nama and that occurring in Mexico.

The Guatemalan birds, though less rufous on the tail, are
somewhat more rufous on the upper breast, and less grey on
that portion of the plumage than those found in Panama*.

As Mr. Sharpe does not describe the immature plumage of
R. ruficauda, I may add that it is represented by the hinder
figure on pl. 88 of ‘ Exotic Ornithology,’ where a succinct
description is also given.

For a description of R. griseocauda, I would refer my readers
to Mr. Ridgway’s ‘ Catalogue of the Falconidz in the Boston
Museum,’ p. 49.

According to De Saussure’s notes on the birds of Mexico,
published in the Rev. et Mag. de Zool. for 1859, p. 120, the
iris in this species is yellow; but according to Sumichrast
(Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus. No. 4, p. 39) it is “bright orange-

* An adult specimen inthe Norwich Museum, resembling the Guate-
malan examples of #. ruficauda, is said to have been obtained in Hon-
duras ; but I have not entire confidence in the accuracy of the ticket which
was attached to the skin, and which assigned to it that locality.

Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres. 483

red,” the latter tint being probably indicative of more ad-
vanced age than the former.

The Norwich Museum possesses two examples of R. griseo-
eauda which were obtained from the Museum at Geneva, and
which were said to have been collected by De Saussure in
Cuba; the species, however, is not included by Gundlach
in his work on the birds of that island.

The third and remaining group (that to which I would re-
strict the generic, or, rather, subgeneric name of Asturina)
consists of two nearly allied species, A. nitida and A. plagi-
ata, the former being the more southern, and the latter the
more northern form ; both of these exhibit a remarkable dif-
ference in marking and in coloration between the immature
and adult plumages, the contrast between the two stages being
much more striking than in the corresponding ages of the
various species of Rupornis. I may add that a specimen of

A. nitida is at the present time (August 1876) living in the

Zoologica] Gardens, and in process of change from the :mma-
ture to the adult dress ;.in this example the iris is hazel and
the cere yellow.

There are two Old-World genera, Butastur and Asturinula,
which appear to me to be essentially and somewhat closely
allied to Rupornis and to Asturina respectively, but which
Mr. Sharpe includes among the Aquilinze, apparently on
account of the hinder aspect of the tarsus being reticulate
rather than scutellate—a mode of diagnosis which is, no doubt,
technically convenient, but which does not always square (as
I venture to think) with the general natural characters of the
birds to which it is applied, and which I therefore, in the case
of these and some other genera, feel compelled to disregard.

Between Rupornis and Butastur there is one very remark-
able coincidence of colouring, in the circumstance that in the
adult birds of all the species of both genera the webs of the
quill-feathers of the wing are more or less conspicuously
tinged with rufous; and I cannot but think that this circum-
stance, combined with a considerable similarity in the general
build and aspect of the birds of these two genera, points them

SER. I1I.—VOL. VI. 21

» eT
ee ETE ce Fine
ae ee 8 aS >: ikon ”
~ = - want: :
ae nee = ’ ——5
— Bet aN + Dee

LEO tp ee Pea

He ere Pte

a+ *S

—— = —

ay StS
Sy

Tee ee

CB Daan SOE BAD tee => pe ininibe
= > ee eS

Senet tnatines

> — =
a a ee

Se ea age oe

- - os
=— teed ne ee
RES ES —

—
me Mea = 2

ef ne

Re ee

pe OE ee ee ee
Se SS a ee TR ee

GIO PINE ae E ma xe
= Es : = =
en aS ae so a

ee ee

ee
a

~ oto ey eee <Segeee Se gest
re = 72
aS =
Pes

-_——~
lit

Loaer

}
¢
pb!
7
ei
1
\

484 Mr. J. H. Gurney’s Notes on

out as to a certain extent representing each other in the west-
ern and eastern hemispheres.

Somewhat as the coloration of Butastur recalls that of Ru-
pornis, does the tone and arrangement of coloration in As-
turinula bring to mind that of Asturina, especially as regards
the remarkable transverse barring of the lower breast and
abdomen; but it must be observed, on the other hand, that
in the case of Asturinula there is little, if any, distinction be-
tween the immature and adult plumage, in which respect it
differs widely from Asturina, and also from the African genus
Melierax, with which (as well as with Asturina) it otherwise
exhibits some considerable affinity.

In adopting the generic appellation of Asturinula, Mr.
Sharpe ignores the older title of Kaupifalco, in which he is
justified by the circumstance of the latter name having been
published by the late Prince C. L. Bonaparte without any
description being annexed thereto.

Mr. Sharpe divides the genus Asturinula in his Catalogue
into two supposed species, A. monogrammica and A. meridi-
onalis; but in his subsequently published edition of Mr.
Layard’s work on the birds of South Africa, at page 42, he
reunites them under the older title of monogrammica. From
a comparison of a series of specimens from different localities
I am convinced that the supposed distinctive characters are
not constant, and do not represent two geographical races, but
are due either to sex or age, or possibly, though less pro-
bably, to mdividual variation; I therefore concur in Mr.
Sharpe’s later view, that there is but one species of this
genus.

I have next to notice two interesting American genera,
Buteogallus and Busarellus, each consisting of but a single
species, and both appearing to hold a somewhat intermediate
place between Heterospizias and Urubitinga (taking the latter
genus in its restricted sense), and also, by the remarkable
development of the curved point of the upper mandible, to
approach in some degree the piscivorous and mollusk-eating
Kites of the genus Rostrhamus, to which they are also pro-
bably allied in their mode of feeding. The genus Busarellus

Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres. 485

has moreover another noticeable feature, which is likewise
common to the genus Pandion, in the rugose under surface
of the foot, a provision specially adapted to retain a grasp on
the slippery prey which constitutes the sustenance of this
fish-eating Buzzard* as well as of the Osprey. As neither
in the case of Buteogallus equinoctialis nor in that of Busa-
rellus nigricollis does Mr. Sharpe give a description of the
immature plumage, I supply the following particulars, derived
from specimens in the Norwich Museum :—

BuTEOGALLUS QUINOCTIALIS, immature, from British
Guiana.

The crown of the head is dark brown, with narrow yellowish
white margins to many of the feathers, especially towards the
sides of the head, and with an irregular yellowish white super-
cilium ; the cheeks, ear-coverts, and throat are pale buff, with
dark shaft-marks to the feathers; on the back and sides of
the neck similar but broader shaft-marks occupy the greater
part of the feather, leaving only a buff edging ; and dark fea-
thers of this character form an irregular gorget extending
from the sides of the neck across the throat, but not quite
meeting in front ; the entire mantle is dark wood-brown, with
paler tips to the feathers, these tips being broadest on the
wing-coverts, but very narrow elsewhere; the feathers of the
bastard wing, the secondaries, and the tertials are crossed by
alternate transverse bars of rufous and dark brown, the rufous
being brightest on the inner webs of the tertials; the upper
surface of the tail is crossed by nine narrow dark brown bars,
below the last of which, at an interval of about an inch, are
two more narrow subterminal bars; but on the inner web of

* Col. A. J. Grayson, who obtained this species near the mouth of the
Mazatlan river, writes respecting it, “the flight of this Hawk seems
rather heavy, resembling somewhat the common Fish-Hawk, the wings
appearing very broad, and the tail remarkably short. Upon examining the
contents of the stomach I found only the remains of fish, one of which had
been but freshly devoured ; it was a species of perch found in the lagoons
and rivers of this region.” (Vide Mem. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist. 1874,
p. 802; also Ridgway’s ‘Studies of American Falconide,’ p. 144.) [See
also our note on the food of this species (Ibis, 1859, p. 216).—Ep, ]

2L2

tae SaaS. Bes>

ae
erat 255

Sa ee 8 ee Pee Pe
ww ta ees

ree ele epee.

af a fi gg

SN sare ee

a
~—

2 SS ego eee

eS ee z
Sa a sum oS =
; = : — * - —————————

486 Mr. J. H. Gurney’s Notes on

the lateral rectrices this interval is occupied by another inter-
mediate transverse bar; the intervals between the several
bars are greyish brown on the central rectrices, but tinged
with rufous on the external webs of the remainder, the cor-
responding intervals on the inner webs being pale buff; the
under surface of the tail is buffy white, crossed by eleven
irregular narrow dark bars; the breast, abdomen, and under
tail-coverts are pale buffy white, the latter with narrow dark
transverse bars at intervals of about half an inch; the wing-
linings and flanks are pale buffy white, with a few dark brown
feathers intermixed, especially on the flanks; the tibiz are
of a similar colour, but tinged with fulvous and mottled with
irregular transverse dark markings, especially on the inner
face of the thighs.

BusARELLUS NIGRICOLLIS, immature.

The crown and back of the head, the nape, and sides of the
neck are striated, each feather being dark brown, with a more
or less broad buff or fulvous margin; the sides of the head
are pale buff, tinged with grey on the ear-coverts ; the upper-
most scapulars and upper interscapulars are dark brown, with
a rufous edging to each feather; all the remainder of the
upper surface exhibits alternate transverse bars of rufous and
dark brown on each feather, except the tips of the tail, the
outer webs and all the lower portions of the primaries, the
tips of the secondaries and tertials, and the feathers of the
bastard wing, which are all dull black ; the chin and upper
throat are yellowish, the lower throat dull black; the breast
fulvous, intermixed with longitudinal markings of rufous and
dark brown; the abdomen and flanks are rufous, slightly
mottled with irregular transverse markings of dark brown;
the wing-linings and tibiz are similarly coloured, but with
the transverse markings more regular; the dark transverse

bars on the tail are six above and seven below, besides the

broader terminal band, the interspaces being rufous on the
upper and pale buff on the under surface.

It may here be proper to notice a new genus and species,
mentioned by Mr. Sharpe in the addenda to his volume, at

Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue-of Accipitres. 487

p. 458, as having been recently described by the late Pro-
fessor Sundevall, under the title of Plangus neoyeus, in Of.
k. Vet. Akad. Forh. 1874, No. 2, p. 28. I have no knowledge
of this species beyond what is contained in Professor Sunde-
vall’s notice of it in the above-named periodical, from which
I transcribe the following particulars :—

“ Plangus, n. gen. plumis occipitis paucis oblongis, lon-
gioribus, cristam formantibus ornatus. Cauda longior (ala
cubitali antica paullo brevior).—Sp. unica cognita, ex Brasilia,
magna, Aquilz zequalis, preecedentibus* affinis; a Morphno
presertim naribus oblongis, longitudinalibus distincta. Ala
magna, lata et longa: quiescens, apice caudz paullo brevior,
pennis cubiti anticis 3 ale fere attingentibus. Tarsus } ale
cub:s equalis; digiti longiusculi, fortes * * * *

““ Plangus neogeus, nob., fuscus, gastreo toto albo, maculis
rachidum angustis, fuscis vario, remigibus rectricibusque extus
fusco-cinereis, maculis minutis, fuscis, crebre variis. Fascia
caude nulla. Ala580 mm. Specimen unicum in Brasilia,
prope Caldas occisum, anno 1855 attulit et Muszeo Stockhol-
miensi donavit cl. G. A. Lindberg.”

The genus Urubitinga, to which I next propose to refer,
should, I think, be restricted, as I have already mentioned,
to two species, U. zonura and U. anthracina, unless U. gund-
lachi be admitted as a third, and considered specifically dis-
tinct from U. anthracina.

I have not much to add to Mr. Sharpe’s account of these
species ; but it may be desirable to note that both in U. zonura
and in U. anthracina the iris is brown.

I may also mention that a specimen of U. anthracina from
the Island of St. Vincent is now living in the Gardens of the
Zoological Society ; this example was in immature dress when
it arrived at the Gardens, but is now in full plumage, with
the exception of a slight tinge of rufous brown on the back
and sides of the head, and also on the tertials. I am indebted
to the kindness of Mr. Bartlett for the following note respect-
ing the moulting of this specimen, which I here insert, as it

* The species here referred to are Urubitinga zonura and Busarellus
migricollis,

sr grnglten at te sae en een eo =
=P mee: et oe ee <= =

A eet cee et et,

488 Mr. J. H. Gurney’s Notes on

does not entirely accord with the view expressed by Mr.
Sharpe as to the mode in which the change from the young
to the adult dress is accomplished, though at the same time
I think it does not preclude the possibility of some portion
of that change being effected in the manner suggested by
Mr. Sharpe :—‘‘ August 22, 1876. The Uruditinga moulted
from the immature brown plumage into a slaty ash-coloured
dress in 1875. The bird has now nearly finished moulting, and
the feathers of the body are very nearly black; the keeper,
as well as myself, considers that the change in colour is due
to change of feathers.” From a conversation with the keeper
who has charge of this specimen, I learned that the newly
acquired feathers were in the first instance covered with a
dusty powder, which gave them an ashy slate-coloured hue
for a time, but which subsequently disappeared.

The Urubitinga found in Cuba was erected into a distinct
species by Cabanis, who assigned to it the specific name of
gundlachi (vide Journ. fir Orn. 1854, p. 80) ; this, however,
is treated by Mr. Sharpe as a synonym of U. anthracina ;
whether correctly or not I cannot say, as I have never seen a
Urubitinga from Cuba. U. gundlachi is said by its describer
to be of a dark chocolate-brown colour; and if this hue be
permanent, and not merely the remains of immaturity, it no
doubt indicates a distinct species; but another character
given, that of two more or less distinct white bands at the
base of the tail and above the central band, is not, I think,
to be relied on; adult specimens of U. anthracina vary much |
in this respect, some having two basal bands, some but one,
and others none. The Norwich Museum possesses specimens
with two such bands from New Granada, Guatemala, and
Southern Mexico; and Messrs. Salvin and Godman have a
similar example from Veragua. The bird from St. Vincent,
now living in the Zoological Gardens, has but one such band,
in which it agrees with a Guatemalan specimen in the col-
lection of Messrs. Salvin and Godman; but the same collec-
tion contains two other Guatemalan skins, in which the basal
band is altogether absent. All these are either nearly or fully
adult individuals.

Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres. 489

In the P. Z. S. for 1870, at p. 554, Dr. Finsch describes a
specimen from Trinidad with two basal bands, which he refers
to U. gundlachi ; but, judging from the description there given,
I venture to doubt the correctness of this identification, and
to think that, if the Cuban race be distinct, the Trinidad bird
is referable to U. anthracina rather than to U. gundlachi.

The collection of Messrs. Salvin and Godman contains a
curious pale-coloured Buzzard, a male bird, obtained at Chepo,
on the Isthmus of Panama, which I believe to be an imma-
ture specimen of U. anthracina in very abnormal plumage ;
by the kindness of its possessors I am able to give the follow-
ing particulars respecting this interesting specimen: the
wing measures 13:1 inches from the carpal joint to the tip
of the primaries, the tarsus 3:1, the middle toe s.u. 1°8. In
connexion with these measurements, and in support of my
view of the bird being really an aberrant example of U. an-
thracina, I may remark that Mr. Ridgway (‘Studies of
American Falconide, p. 170) gives the following dimensions
as the result of an examination of forty-eight individuals of
that species :—“ wing 13°15 to 15°80, tarsus 3°00 to 3:50,
middle toe 1°60 to 1:80.”

The specimen now under consideration has evidently been
killed whilst moulting; and the old feathers, wherever they
remain, are considerably paler than those which have been
newly assumed, this being no doubt the result of their being
worn and faded; the feathers on the upper portion of the
head and on the back of the neck are wood-brown, edged with
fulvous, this edging being most conspicuous above the ear-
coverts, which are themselves buff, with dark brown tips ;
the interscapulary feathers are some of them a pale sandy
colour, with a dark shaft-mark, on each side of which is an
irregular rufous mark running from the base of the shaft and
at an acute angle with it, to the edge of the web; these ap-
pear to be the older feathers; the newer are of a wood-brown
of varying intensity, and edged with rufous; the scapulars
and wing-coverts are of a pale dove-colour, irregularly barred
and edged with rufous ; the tertials are of similar colour, and
transversely barred with rufous on the inner webs, the outer

SSS

aap ee

ee eae

ew ng

~ = ~— - - Po —
at 4 gu be o * ~~ am « v«
See
cS ee a ee

Se ar ea eI
Sell =—“—E >

at aes

Cea ee
STS yA RE

PSE SSeS Tt.

ee a

SETI. a ee.

BE et oe

ane ———= a
2 eeneeeee
SSS Sees

490 Mr. J. H. Gurney’s Notes.on

webs being speckled with the same; the primaries and secon-
daries are wood-brown, faintly barred with transverse mark-
ings of the same colour, but of a darker hue, and slightly
tinged with rufous on the inner web; the feathers on the
lower back are of a darker dove-colour, tipped with rufous
and with concealed white bases; the upper tail-coverts are
similar, but many of them are barred with pale luteous, which
occupies most of the outer web on the exterior feathers of
these coverts ; the upper surface of the tail is crossed by eight
dark transverse bars, of which the lowest is broader than the
others, subterminal, and distinct ; the three bars above the
lowest are edged, above and below, with rusty brown, this
being especially observable on the central rectrices ; the inter-
spaces between the dark bars are white near the base of the
tail, gradually becoming grey as the tip is approached; the
under surface of the tail shows seven indistinct dark bars, with
yellowish grey mterspaces; the throat is yellowish white,
and the whole under surface thence to the vent is a rich
buff, varied by darker shaft-marks, which are broadest on the
upper breast and flanks; the tibiz are buff, with narrow trans-
verse bars of a darker hue of the same; the under tail-coverts
resemble the thighs, except that the transverse bars are further
apart; the wing-linings are of a very similar character to
the under tail-coverts, but the transverse markings are less
regular.

Amongst the birds that in many respects are nearly related
to the genus Uruditinga, must be reckoned that scarce and
curious species discovered by Tschudi in Peru, and described
by him under the name of Circaétus solitarius, for which the
late Jules Verreaux subsequently proposed the generic title
of Urubitornis, and also that somewhat better known, but
also uncommon species, Harpyhaliaétus coronatus.

I agree with Mr. Sharpe that both these birds may very
properly be referred to the genus Harpyhaliaétus; but I can-
not concur in his view that they should both be referred to
the same species, as, although they agree in form and dimen-
sions, they differ in H. solitarius being always (when adult)

Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres. 491

much more darkly coloured, with a shorter crest*, and in their
very distinct geographical distribution—H. coronatus being
found in Patagonia, and thence northwards to Bolivia and
Southern Brazil, whilst H. solitarius has been obtained in
Chilit, Peru, New Granada (Antioquia), Veragua, Guatemala
(San Geronimo), and probably also Southern Mexico, as a
Central-American specimen in the Norwich Museum is be-
lieved to have been obtained in that country: this example
is very nearly adult; and I add the following particulars
respecting it, as Mr. Sharpe gives no description: of this
species :—The general colouring throughout is bluish black,
shaded with chocolatet; the quill feathers of the wing are
blackish, but the secondaries are tinged and mottled with
grey, except at the tips, which are black; the upper tail-
coverts are tipped with white; the tail is black, tipped with
white, and has a broad white median band and traces of an
imperfect basal band, which is also white.

The following is a description of a specimen in immature
plumage, from Veragua, in the collection of Messrs. Salvin
and Godman :—The entire mantle is dark chocolate-brown,
but with most of the feathers narrowly edged with rufous ;
the greater wing-coverts are much mottled with rufous, espe-
cially the inner webs of the coverts overlapping the secon-
daries, which, together with the tertials, are also tipped with
rufous ; the secondaries and the tertials resemble the greater
wing-coverts, but the secondaries are somewhat more rufous ;
the primaries are dark, becoming black towards the tips, but
with the base of the inner webs white, spotted with dark
brown ; the upper tail-coverts are rufescent fulvous, with
large shaft-marks of dark chocolate brown; the rectrices,

* A nearly adult female of H. coronatus in the Norwich Museum has
a crest 3°75 inches in length, whilst, so far as I have observed, the cor-
responding occipital feathers in H. solitarius do not, at most, exceed the
length of about two inches.

+ The specimen in the British Museum entered in Mr, Sharpe’s work
under the head of H. coronatus, ‘c. Var. st. Chili,” is a nearly adult ex-
ample of H. solitarius.

{ This chocolate tint probably indicates a remaining trace of im-
maturity.

ae Bas
eee

{Sra "te canted — ea
es Poe ai ah A Ses SRS a ol sche |
= ~ast = : + :
— é ~*~ aed eer &
SS ee aa aia

ee Ee eae Te

es .

- . = Fe ee ba A
ee

Sea

SSS SS

a ee
eran ee:

nee

Joa]

492 Notes on Mr. R. B. Sharpe’s Catalogue of Accipitres.

with the exception of being white at the base, are greyish
brown, mottled with darker spots of the same colour; the
crown of the head, the cheeks, and the neck are rufescent-
fulvous, with dark brown shaft-marks; and a similar style of
coloration and markings pervades the lining of the wings and
the remaining portion of the under surface of the body, with
the exception of the sides of the upper breast, which are dark
brown, and of the thighs, which are also dark brown but with
rufous tips to some of the feathers.

Mr. Sharpe does not describe the immature plumage of H.
coronatus. 'The youngest specimen of it which I have seen
is preserved in the Museum of the University of Cambridge,
and is considerably more advanced towards maturity than the
immature specimen of H, solitarius above described, from
which it chiefly differs in the greyer tint of its dark, and the
paler hue of its rufescent parts, and also by its slightly more
developed occipital crest ; 1t shows remains of rufous colouring
on the tertials, but not on the secondaries; the upper tail-
coverts are dark grey, with whitish edgings ; the tail is as in
the adult bird, with the exception of the two outer pairs of
rectrices, which resemble the corresponding feathers im the
immature H. solitarius, but with rather more white upon
them ; the wing-linings resemble those of the young H. soli-
tarius, but the rufescent portions are paler, and with more
or less white on several of the feathers; the feathers on the
flanks are pale fulvous, with very long dark shaft-marks ; the
rufescent edgings to the tibial feathers are broader than in
the young H. solitarius; the under tail-coverts are pale buff,
with one or two transverse bars of chocolate-brown on each
feather ; and I may also mention that the plumage of the head
exhibits an especially noticeable pale fulvescent mark running
backwards from above the centre of the eye.

Mr. Sharpe mentions this streak behind the eye in his de-
scription of the adult plumage ; but in fully adult birds it dis-
appears, as does also the whitish hue on the sides of the face
and neck, and the chocolate gloss on the mantle, to which Mr.
Sharpe refers, his description being taken from a specimen
not entirely adult ; in old birds these tints are all ultimately

On new Species of Birds from Western Ecuador. 493

superseded by a clear grey, a process the progress of which
I watched. in a specimen which lived for many years in the
Gardens of the Zoological Society.

Mr. Sharpe also includes amongst the Buteonine the genera
Morphnus and Thrasaétus; but as these appear to me to
be, notwithstanding their scutellated tarsi, essentially Hawk
Eagles, I defer their consideration until I reach that group.

XLVI.—On some new Species of Birds from Western Ecuador.
By Ossert Savin, M.A., F.R.S., &c.

(Plate XIV.)

Mr. C. Bucxizy, who recently enriched Mr. Godman’s and
my collection by sending us a large series of bird-skins from
Bolivia, is now collecting in Ecuador, having, on leaving
Bolivia, paid a few months’ visit to this country. During his
absence from South America he instructed his native assistant,
Senor Villagomez, whom he left at Guayaquil, to proceed to
Puna Island and to make an excursion into the Province of
Loxa in quest of butterflies and birds. On Mr. Buckley’s
return to Guayaquil from England, he found Villagomez had
returned with collections; and he at once forwarded the birds
to us through his agent, Mr. E. T. Higgins.

The collection altogether contains specimens of 140 species
of birds, many of which are of considerable interest, and some
new to science. These last I now propose briefly to describe,
reserving a more detailed account of the whole series to a
future occasion, by which time I trust we shall receive other
collections from Mr. Buckley, who, I understand, has now
proceeded into the interior of Ecuador, and is working in some
of the valleys of the eastern slope of the Andes.

__EuscarTHMUS OCULARIS.

Supra olivaceo-viridis, fronte media obscuriore : loris et re-
gione ante oculos pallide fulvescentibus : gutture nigro :
gula media et ventre imo albis, pectore grisescente : alis
et cauda fuscis viridi limbatis, tectricibus subalaribus

494 Mr. O. Salvin on some new

flavissimis : rostro fusco, pedibus carneis : long. tota 3°7,
alze 1:8, caude 1°6, rostri a rictu.'55, tarsi ‘6.

Sm ject

——

f ha Oi Hab. * Puna I.,” et “San Lucas,” rep. Aiquat.

i f it Hil i Obs. E. granadensi affinis, loris fulvis nec albis distin-
! i | ; guendus. : aa
A ‘: This species agrees closely with EL. granadensis in every
A Nee respect but the colouring of the large loral spot. As the two
as Ha specimens sent agree in having this mark tinged with fulvous,
f i, i I conclude that they belong to a race allied to, but distinct

from, E. granadensis.

FORMICIVORA SPECIOSA.

3 fronte media, capitesummo cum nucha, stria per oculos ad
nucham producta et torque pectorali nigris: stria super-
ciliari a naribus ad dorsum extensa, gutture et colli late-
ribus albis cervino tinctis: dorso fusco-brunneo, alis et

Ma he cauda nigris, hac griseo limbata, rectricibus duabus ex-

MARL inti) ternis utrinque albido marginatis, illis primariorum sex

P| externorum maryginibus albis, reliquis dorsi colore pictis :
Hae secundariis intimis et tectricibus alarum majoribus cas-
a taneis nigro medialiter notatis: tectricibus minoribus et
alula spuria nigris albo marginatis: pectore lete castaneo,
ventre pallidiore: tibiis et crisso cervinis : rostro nigro,
pedibus carneis: long. tota 6:0, ale 2°3, caude 2:5, rostri

a rictu 0°7, tarsi 1:0.

? mari similis sed corpore subtus a torque pectorali ad cris-
sum cervino unicolori, tectricibus quoque alarum cas-
tanelis pallidioribus: long. tota 5:4, alee 2°2, caudz 2°4,
rostri a rictu 0°65, tarsi 0°9.

HiT Hab. “Puna I.,” rep. Aquat.

This very well-marked and beautiful species, though quite
unlike any other member of the genus in its coloration, comes
perhaps nearer to F’. strigilata, Max., than any other. The
Wy conspicuous markings of the head, the white throat, tinged
iH i with fawn-colour, the black pectoral band, and the deep-chest-
ur nut breast of the male, as well as other minor features, render
it a remarkable bird. ‘The collection contains only three spe-
cimens, one male and two females, all from Puna Island.

ee seco wes Shae eR eStE EEE a Sa a
SSS ips ee SS Se Fs Fae re SSS ee er
* = yeas ce FOG - Te Say PEE PS Pea Mase” Se ace * sc eich iaen ae on

Capiro squaMATus. Plate XIV.

Nitenti-niger, fronte rubra, vertice albido nucham versus
brunnco marginato: dorso, uropygio, et alarum tectricibus

Bt 3 BEE ain BEST

nhart imp.

M&N.H

emans lith.

seen
ut

J.GK

SQAMATUS.

[TO

ee SSS ee eee sae See Sein,

SSE a Fes = sei cca ened — ae — = ae:

Species of Birds from Western Ecuador. 495

stricte albo marginatis: secudariorum trium internorum
pogoniis externis plaga magna albida notatis: ventre
pallidissime flavo, hypochondriis nigro maculatis: rostro
et pedibus plumbeis: long. tota 7:0, alee 3°3, caudee 2°2,
rostri a rictu 1:0, tarsi 0°85.

Hab. “Santa Rita,” rep. Aquat.

The collection contains but a single specimen of this re-
markable species, of which the sex, unfortunately, is not
marked. ‘The prevailing rich black colour of the plumage
suggests perhaps an alliance with C. maculicoronatus, in
which the female has the whole throat and chest black, as in
the present bird. This would lead one to suppose that this
specimen is a female; but the colour of the head is perhaps
opposed to this view. The point cannot be settled until more
specimens have been examined.

PIONOPSITTA PYRRHOPS.

Prasina, facie (oculorum ambitu incluso), humeris, tectricibus
subalaribus minoribus et macula ventrali coccineis: ver-
tice antico, regione parotica, et tectricibus auricularibus
aureo vix tinctis, vertice postico ceruleo lavato: primariis
extus et caude apicibus purpurascenti-ceruleis: rostro
pallido, pedibus plumbeis: long. tota 9:0, alee 5°6, caude
3°5, tarsi 0'5.

Hab. “Santa Rita” et “San Lucas,” rep. Aiquat.

Obs. P. amazonine (Des Murs, Icon. Orn. t. 15) affinis sed
colore coccineo capitis superioris fronti restricto et caude
basi viridi nec rubra distinguendus.

There are two specimens of this pretty species in the col-
lection. It is evidently a close ally of P. amazonina, but
separable by the characters pointed out above. In addition
to these the lores are rather deeper red, and not tinged with
yellow, as is the case with the allied bird. P. amazonina,
too, has the green of the upper breast and sides of the neck
rather more tinged with yellow.

P. amazonina was placed by Mr. Sclater and myself in the
genus Caica in our ‘Nomenclator Av. Neotr.;’ but a reex-
amination of this species with that now described, and with
recently acquired specimens of P. melanotis (Latr.), has con-
yinced me that its proper position is in the genus Piono-

496 On new Species of Birds from Western Ecuador.

psitta. The tail of this genus is longer and more cuneiform
than in Caica, and the bill is more feeble.

Pionopsitta was, by an oversight, omitted from our ‘ No-
menclator.’ As far as I know them, the species that should
be included in it are the following :—

Pionopsitta pileata . . ex Brasilia.

Pomelanstise Ae Gov 4 ex Bohya.

P. brachyura . . «. «. ex Amazonia et Aiquat.
P.amazonina . . . . ex Columbia.
Pepyrrhops) Ye OL) Cite Aquat? Ocal

LEUCOPTERNIS OCCIDENTALIS.

Supra saturate plumbeus fere unicolor: dorso postico et uro-
pygio albis, hoc plumbeovariegato: capite summo etnucha
albo vix intermixto: primariis plumbescenti-nigris, secun-
dariis albo terminatis et nigro obsolete transfasciatis, tec-
tricibus humeralibus albo punctatis: cauda alba, fascia
lata subterminali nigra, apice alba: subtus albus, genis et
colli lateribus fasciis minutis notatis: pagina inferiore
alarum alba: remigibus et secundariis intus nigro trans-
fasciatis, apicibus nigris: rostro et cera plumbeo-nigris,
pedibus flavis: long. tota 18:0, alee 140, caudee 8:0, ros-
tri a rictu 1°6, tarsi 3:0.

Hab. Rep. Aquat. occident.

Obs. L. albicolli affinis sed capite summo plerumque plum-
beo nec albo, colore supra plumbescentiore et fascia caudali an-
gustiore distinguendus.

The label giving the precise locality where this bird was
shot has unfortunately been lost ; but the habitat of tle species
may be assigned to the Province of Loxa or Puna Island, where
alone Villagomez collected.

No species of this form has hitherto been noted from Ecua-
dor; so that one might well have been expected from there.
Moreover, as the range of most of the species of this genus
is limited to circumscribed districts, it is not surprising to find
this bird differing from its more eastern ally *.

* Since the above was in type Mr. Gurney’s note (anted, p. 473) re-
cording the existence of a specimen of ZL. albicollis from “ Quito” in the
Norwich Museum has come before me. The bird I now describe is
doubtless the representative of ZL. albicoilis in the western forests of the

Mr. G. N. Lawrence on Muscipeta incanescens. 497

XLVII.—Note on Muscipeta incanescens, Wied.
By Grorce N. Lawrence.

Durine my investigation of certain doubtful species of Tyrant-
birds I examined the type of M. incanescens, Wied, in the
American Museum of Natural History, in the city of New
York. Much to my surprise I found it to be of a very dif-
ferent form from Ornithion obsoletum, O. pusillum, and the
bird from Mexico described by Mr. Sclater under the name
of Camptostoma imberbe, which last he considers to be identical
with M. incanescens, and places it in the genus Ornithion (see
aie aloy Ope. s)

As M. incanescens proves to be of quite a different genus,
and C. imberbe clearly belongs to the genus Ornithion (as
stated by Mr. Sclater), his title must be reinstated, and the
species called Ornithion imberbe, Scl.

M. incanescens, Wied, is greyish olive above, with the
centres of the crown-feathers inconspicuously dull reddish
brown ; lores and a space behind the eye greyish white ; under
plumage greyish white, with just a perceptible tinge of fulvous
on the breast and abdomen; wing-coverts and quills rather
light brown, the middle and greater coverts and the secon-
daries ending with whitish ; tail-feathers light brown, like the
wings, the outer web of the outer feather paler; bill wide
and of a blackish brown colour, lighter at the base of under
mandible, it is furnished with rictal bristles, which are quite
long though rather slender; bend of the wing and under
wing-coverts white with a scarcely perceptible tinge of yel-
low; tarsi and toes hazel-brown.

Wing 2, inches, tail 2, tarsus 3%, bill from front +5,
width of bill 54.

In general appearance it much resembles some species of
Ornithion; but the bill differs greatly : viewed from above it
is precisely of the form of the bill of my specimen of Myiobius
pulcher, not differing in length and width; but it is rather
higher, anda side view of it is much like that of an Ornithion ;

Andes, the last-mentioned bird extending its range from Guiana to the
eastern slopes of the same mountains.

498 Mr. B. L. Layard on a new Species of Myiolestes.

consequently the two mandibles are stouter than those of M.
pulcher, especially the under one.

The bill is in shape more like that of Myiobius than of any
other genus with which I have compared it, and for the pre-
sent I incline to place it there. In this view I only follow
Mr. G. R. Gray, who -puts Platyrhynchus murinus, Spix, in
Myjiobius, and as identical with M. incanescens, Wied.

XLVIII.—Description of a new Species of Myiolestes from
Fiji. By E. L. Layarp, C.M.G., F.Z.S., &c., H.B.M. Con-

sul at Naumea, New Caledonia.

Tux discovery of another new species of Myiolestes in Fiji
does not surprise me, as I feel confident. that when the
islands to the southward and eastward are examined, addi-
tional novelties will reward the explorer’s trouble. I hope
Mr. Kleinschmidt, collector for Messrs. Godeffroy, will be
able to visit them; I have urgently advised him to do so.

The present new species was discovered on Kandavu (the
largest of the southern islands) along with several other
novelties, by a collector whom I counselled to proceed thither,
as the locality was likely to produce new things. It may- be
at once distinguished from all other species of the genus by
its large size, I therefore propose to call it

Myio.estEs MAxiMA, Layard.

&. General colour throughout warm brown, clearer and
paler below, lightest on the upper throat and vent; flanks
slightly rufous; no grey tinge about the lower parts, as in
M. vitiensis, Hartl., nor is there the slightest trace of the
whitish tips to the tail-feathers, which are very indistinctly
edged and tipped with rufous ; inner and outer webs of wing-
primaries the same, but more distinct; bill very large and
strongly hooked, black, with the edges of both mandibles
and the tip whitish horn-colour; legs bluish. Length 8",
wing 4", tail 3! 6", bill 1” 2” (broad 5!), tarsus 1” 1!". Iris
brown. Food insects.

Habits same as those of the other known species.

Ornithological Notes and Corrections. 499

XLIX.—A few Ornithological Notes and Corrections.
By W. E. Brooks.

PHYLLOSCOPUS VIRIDANUS.

Dr. Severtzoff says (anted, p. 81) that Turkestan examples
of this bird differ much in the form of the bill; and he de-
scribes two varieties as P. intermedia and P. hypolania. It
is strange that Dr. Severtzoff should find such variation ; for
in India we find the characteristics of this species remark-
ably constant. It is probable that Dr. Severtzoff had other
species mixed with his P. viridanus. The female of P. magni-
rostris 1s difficult to separate from that of P. viridanus.

ANTHUS MAcULATUS, Hodgson.

Dr. Severtzoff says (anted, p. 180), “The form known as
Anthus agilis, Sykes, was also found in 1874 in the moun-
tains east of Kuldja.” I have examined the type of Anthus
agilis; and it is not the green Chinese Pipit named A. macu-
latus by Hodgson, but is the common Tree-Pipit, Anthus
trivialis.

Ataupa cuLeuta, Franklin (antea, p. 181).

Alauda triborhyncha, Hodgs., judging from its short
wing, cannot be separated from the common Indian spe-
cies, 4. gulgula. Hodgson, in a note, states that his spe-
cles was founded upon an example with a peculiarly worn
bill. Many ornithologists erroneously suppose that A. tri-
borhyncha is a large Lark, and misapply the term to Alauda
dulcivox.

Hyrotats RAMA, Sykes (Ibis, 1874, p. 184).

In spite of the small total length of Sykes’s bird, the type of
Sylvia rama is the longer-billed and greyer species. The iden-
tification of H. rama with H. caligata, Mr. Dresser informs me,
was a mistake. My remarks about the rufous tone of the new
autumnal plumage apply to H. caligata, and not to Sykes’s
bird. My conclusions, drawn from Sykes’s measurements,
were right in the two instances of Milvus govinda and Alauda
deva; but I was wrong asregards H.rama. Mr. Dresser (Ibis,
1875, p. 518) identified the larger bird with Sykes’s type.

SER. III.—VOL. VI. 2M

500 Mr. W. E. Brooks’s Ornithological

Antuus cERVINUS (Ibis, 1874, p. 460).

I have seen this bird from the Andamans. It is quite di-
stinct from Anthus rosaceus, Hodgs. I have also seen it from
Yarkand. Anthus pratensis and Budytes rayi were also col-
lected in the same country by Dr. Stoliczka.

Sturnvus vutearis (Ibis, 1875, p. 238).

Mr. Dresser speaks of Hume’s Starling as “ the Indian form
of our European Starling.” Sturnus vulgaris is the common
Starling of India, and must not be confounded with the little
Cashmere Starling which is figured in ‘ Lahore to Yarkand,’
the name of which I propose changing to Sturnus humit, the
term nitens being preoccupied.

This small Starling is, as a rule, nearly or quite spotless ;
_ but in winter it is spotted; at least those I shot im the plains
of India were fairly spotted. The spots, however, are very
different from the large ones of S. vulgaris. The egg also is
much smaller. The common Starling was not seen by me in
Cashmere, where I found Sturnus humi breeding plentifully.
The European bird breeds, I believe, in Afghanistan.

“ AQuILA CLANGA”’ (Ibis, 1875, p. 294).

Is the Greater Spotted Eagle here referred to, or A. nipa-
lensis? 'The latter has been called A. clanga by some conti-
nental ornithologists. : |

“ Aquita N&vIA” (Ibis, 1875, p. 294).

Is it the Lesser Spotted Eagle that is here referred to? If
so, it is certainly not entitled to the name, as Mr. Dresser has
shown (Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 4, xii. p. 378).

“ Aquita N&viA (Gm.),” Capt. Clarke Kennedy “On the
Avifauna of the Desert of Sinai and of the Holy Land,” Ibis,
1874, p. 112.

Here again we cannot possibly tell what species is referred
to; for Aquila nevia of one ornithologist is not the Aguila
nevia of another. In referring to these worse than nameless
birds, it would be convenient always to add “ Greater” or
“* Lesser Spotted Eagle,” as the case may be, until the Latin
name for each be agreed upon by ornithologists.

Notes and Corrections. d0L

ANTHUS SEEBOHMI, Dresser (anted, p. 120).

In coloration this species very much resembles summer
examples of A. pratensis; but the bill is very different, being
almost that of a Corydalla. The wing-formula also differs,
as described by Mr. Dresser.

ANTHUS NEGLECTUS, sp. nov.

Under the head of Anthus spinoletta Mr. Dresser, in ‘The
Birds of Europe,’ refers to a similar but smaller Indian Pipit,
to which I gave the name of A. neglectus. “No description was
published, as there was some doubt at the time as to it being
a good species. I have since examined many Anthus spi-
noletta myself; and the small Indian bird cannot be con-
sidered identical. It differs as follows—(1) smaller size,
(2) shorter wing, (3) shorter and more slender bill. In sum-
mer plumage the birds are very similar; but in winter dress
the breast-spots are not large and cloudy as in A. spinoletta,
but small and much more distinct. Another important di-
stinction is the well-striated back of A. neglectus. I have the
total length in the flesh of only four examples. They were
all exactly six inches. The bill was dark brown, and very
pale brown at base of lower mandible ; irides very dark, al-
most black; legs and feet brown; soles of feet yellow. In
general coloration it resembles A. arboreus, but is considerably
paler and greyer; the back striation is of similar character ;
the breast-spots, however, are not distinct, as in A. pratensis,
but somewhat clouded and brown in colour; they are also
much smaller and more distinct than the spots of either A.
obscurus or A. spinoletta. The different character of the
breast-spots alone serves to separate this Water-Pipit from its
affined species ; the wings and tail are coloured like those of
A. spinoletta. The summer plumage is also similar, the
breast-spots being replaced by a uniform dull reddish buff.
The wing-lining and axillaries are white.

This Pipit frequents extensive swamps and lakes (jheels, as
they are called) in the northern parts of India during the
cold season; and in the spring it takes its departure for the
north. It is extremely shy and difficult of approach. I have

502 Mr. W. E. Brooks’s Ornithological

generally found it in company with Anthus rosaceus. Ihave
not, however, always found it at “jheels” frequented by this
latter species, which is a far more abundant bird. Its call-
and alarm-notes are like those of Anthus pratensis. 'The fol-
lowing are dimensions of some examples I have by me :—

No. Sex. Wing. Tail. Bill at front. Tarsus.
Ve 3 3°22 2°6 ‘45 88
2. 3 od 2°63 45 88
3. 2 3°15 2:57 45 87
4, 2 3°33 2°6 46 83
5. 2 3°25 2°55 46 88
6. oe 3'2 2°65 45 88
7. Q 32 2°55 43 87
8. 2 3°28 2°5 45 85
9. 2 3°23 2°65 46 86

10. 2 o'12 2°45 43 87

sak 2 3'3 2°52 45 88

12. 2 31 2°5 ‘45 83

18. + 3°27 2°6 “46 85

I have seen other males in addition to the two noted above.
A glance at the above dimensions shows this Pipit to be
very different from those of the large A. spinoletta.

Moracitia crtReoLorpeEs, Hodgs. (anted, p. 178).

The black-backed yellow-headed Wagtail is apparently re-
ferred to. J have examined Hodgson’s original drawings;
and both illustrations of M. citreoloides represent M. citreola,
Pallas. Apparently Mr. Hodgson did not know the black-
backed bird in breeding-plumage; but he discriminates it in
winter dress as M. calcaratus. This bird has, as a rule, a
stouter and longer tarsus than M. citreola, and also a longer
hind claw. It is by the long tarsus alone that I connect
Hodgson’s M. calcaratus with the black-backed bird; for the
tarsus was drawn of maximum length, with which the figured
dimensions correspond. No M. citreola has a tarsus of such
a length.

Hodgson’s drawing of M. citreoloides hardly shows the
black collar which is characteristic of M. citreola; but I have
seen several examples of the latter in which the collar had
not been acquired, being missed in the spring moult, although

Notes and Corrections. 503

the plumage was otherwise perfect. Hodgson may have drawn
from this variety.

Mr. Dresser appears to have followed My. Gould in a mis-
application of the term M. citreoloides.

ANTHUS PRATENSIS (anted, p. 179).

Here Dr. Severtzoff gives particulars of varieties. Pipits,
though differing but little in form and plumage, have very
different voices and songs; but on these points Dr. Severtzoff
does not inform us. When Pipits are thoroughly understood,
in life as well as in the skin, “ intermediate forms ” disappear.
I would not, however, say the same of the Skylarks, in which
genus it is very difficult to determine which are good species
and which are not.

PRATINCOLA RUBICOLA (anted, p. 215).

The Asiatic form of the Stonechat is not P. rubicola. _ Mr.
Swinhoe’s distinction is infallible, and the plain unstriated
upper tail-coverts of the Asiatic bird always serve to di-
stinguish it.

PHYLLOSCOPUS TROCHILUS (anted, p. 216).

Ihave examined the doubtful species here mentioned. The
wing is rather different from usual, and the voice may also
have been abnormal; but it so strongly resembles P. trochilus
that I would not separate it unless others of the same kind
were examined.

PHYLLOSCOPUS TRISTIS (anted, p. 217).

I have seen skins from Ladak bearing a date which showed
the bird was at its breeding-quarters ; and I drew the same
conclusion that I did when I saw July examples of Reguloides
superciliosus amongst Dr. Jerdon’s birds. The locality of a
July Phylloscopus skin gives the breeding-place.

PHYLLOSCOPUS NEGLECTUS (anted, p. 218).

This bird cannot yet be added to the European list. Mr.
Seebohm’s bird is an undercoloured example of P. tristis ;
and I showed him the specimen referred to in ‘The Ibis,’
1869, p. 286. Anthus rosaceus is also sometimes deficient in
coloration as regards the yellow axillaries.

ene : * a .
Pek es LE = a“ ee a Bower ee. = ee 2 : z — en
Pad —— be ae — a al eniede - eaten > se Aes ot = se ogee
Saceee WS eh ot ke a : Gx PS moe Shh As = aa 2> SS a sy =k £ 2 wa - .
Se gests Sega dey i —_ rae - : x . are St |
Aa a pn EN ee ote er - = 7 ~ 2 eae > =
c= ATI a we —- ot = ES oe 5 . Ss soe -—- 3
i TGA = x x ees ge es ae = — —) J oe iy a ey agit ry S L* paw s¥ S aa
a = 23 2S a 5 ‘ ree Se Ee PELL SEN —— SETS ; -

Se es
PSS TASH

hot Sep eS yee
m re

< oe (t=
earner
OS ESET

Me 20

ures

e mie 2 es = aoa” .*
2 - ms — ae ae
S mpeetemieeciag- antes pce RRNaeEST A

Ree
CE OG FOP
— SS

ake

mma
<y

ee
Soe
pn nae —
- +=
=

“9
5

apes

ee mls

SS al

£ 4
Ui eaten

504 Letters, Announcements, &c.

In ‘The Ibis’ for July 1874, p. 300, Mr. Blanford says,
“ At the same time I cannot agree with Mr. Brooks that allied
species do not interbreed in the wild state. I may recall a
few instances to his recollection ; I can assure him they are
facts and not speculations. First we have the occurrence of
intermediate forms between Hypolais pallida and H. caligata
in Persia.”

“Intermediate forms” between Aguila fulvescens, Gray,
and Aquila maculata, Gm. (A. clanga, Pallas), and between
Anthus arboreus and Anthus maculatus, have been heard of ;
but these were easily resolved into one of the species named,
and so will it be with all other intermediate forms. JH. pal-
lida and H. rama (Mr. Blanford refers to this bird as H. ca-
ligata) have different voices and songs; aud although we con-
sider them much alike, I think their eyes and ears are better
than ours, and that they would not interbreed-in a wild state.
When two species are much alike in colour, but differ in size,
it is a very difficult thing to tell a large skin of the smaller
from a small one of the larger species ; but we must not on
this account conclude that they are identical. The voice of
the doubtful bird would probably have cleared up the diffi-
culty; and we much need the help of the lving bird when
closely affined species are under consideration.

L.—Letters, Announcements, &c.

The following letters, addressed “To the Editor of ‘The

Ibis, ”? have been received :—
Levuka, May 1876.

Sir,—Permit me to make a few remarks on the “ List of
Samoan Birds,” by the Rey. 8. J. Whitmee, in your number
for last October (1875, p. 436), for the purpose of correcting
one or two slight errors (or supposed errors) into which my
friend has fallen, and in the correction of which I think he
agrees with me. I say ‘‘ supposed errors,” for without con-
sulting the original description by the first describer, I see how
errors of identification may easily be made. 'The mistakes in

Letters, Announcements, &c. 505

the synonymy of my ‘ Birds of South Africa’ are entirely at-
tributable to this cause; and though I shall be glad if Mr.
Sharpe, with the unrivalled opportunities at his command,
can purge my pages of their errors, I agree with you in re-
gretting (Ibis, 1875, p. 505) that he has altogether suppressed
the synonymy and descriptions of genera &c. in the second
edition now being issued.

Since Mr. Whitmee wrote his paper I have had the good
fortune to make his personal acquaintance; and together we
have carefully gone over the birds of Samoa, most of which
I procured whilst staying under his hospitable roof. Of
course the ‘ Ornithologie Centralpolynesiens’ of Drs. Finsch
and Hartlaub was our textbook, and only reference; and
the question then arises, Are the descriptions of species con-
tained in it (those of Peale, Cassin, and others) original de-
scriptions, or only those of the learned doctors themselves
from specimens acquired by them ?

The first bird that engaged our attention was the common
Pachycephala, which Mr. Whitmee had previously sent me
amongst other specimens. Whatwasit? My friend said he
had identified it with P. icteroides ; but no mention is made,
in the description, of the dark ashy grey of the chin and sides
of the throat, which the Samoan bird possesses. I was in-
clined to call it P. flavifrons, as a Fijian bird, found on Ovalau,
answered sufficiently to the description of P. icteroides ; but
I was met by the “ gutture albo” of P. flavifrons, while all
notice of the yellow patch near the nostrils was omitted !!

The Fijian bird (P. icteroides ?) is not found in Samoa; nor
is the Samoan bird (P. flavifrons?) found in Fiji. Some of
the Fijian species have a yellow nostril-patch; others have
not (care must be taken not to confound it with P. graffi,
wherein the patch is very distinct). If I am right in my
conjecture, the Samoan bird will stand as P. flavifrons
(Peale), and the description in the ‘Ornithologie’ must be
amended by the substitution of “doris nitide flavis” for “ gut-
ture albo.”

But what is Pachycephala albifrons (Peale)? None of us
here can identify it. I fancy it must be either an abnormal

—
-

SE LAE EE REE

ESAS AT FP RS IE BS
——— -- :

eT OE

as ae

a
=

ee ee

- x >

Syren es

i
:
:
ue | j
i }
ik
At
aa
q
}
Gi
é i }
mie bit
Ve et
a1 |
1
*) if
ee | tl
‘) iy
10
7 '
ii |
ay
tia
ti i
in) ha!
ah
ie |
at i
(| ate
i
Wh ;
Wh |
iia
ik 1
Ve
tie i
i MW
pt M
at
ie |
FP !
st '
th }
: | ‘|
Ay)
a wlie } It
iH
we
ia }
it
| ii}
Wit
tik
tl
HW
tlh
| {
ih
it
it
4
I
ita
i
i
at
}
q
ae
{ \
7
7
ri
Re 8 ‘7 i
4
y 1
+b
Vy q
wt
\
ao ul
TAP |
{
a
i
Wy x
\
4
L {
{
i
BS )
|
ie w|
i.
by ah!
HH | |
( |
ae
eG tg
Thi
t
: 7
:
f) i
‘
tH 7
V4 j
ih
]
i
'
‘
ee

506 Letters, Announcements, &c.

P. flavifrons, or an inhabitant of another group of islands.
So far as we know, it is not found either in Samoa, Tonga,
or Fiji.

Mr. Whitmee identifies the Samoan “Green Dove” as
Ptilinopus fasciatus, Peale, and regards P. apicalis, Bp., as a
synonym of P. perousii, Peale. Herein I think he is mis-
taken; and I think, by this time, having received P. fas-
ciatus sent from here, he will now agree with me. P. fas-
ciatus, though closely resembling P. apicalis, differs essen-
tially from it, as I have pomted out in a paper recently trans-
mitted to the Zoological Society, and does not, I feel sure,
extend its range to Samoa, though Drs. Finsch and Hartlaub
include it in their list of Samoan birds. I fear their authority, ~
Dr. Graffe, was not, from all I hear, sufficiently careful in
recording the habitats of the species he collected; for orni-
thology had by no means a first claim on his attention.

The Samoan bird agrees with Bonaparte’s curt description
of P. apicalis, as given by Finsch and Hartlaub, as far as it
goes; but then whose description is this? In the illustrated
catalogue of the Museum Godeffroy, which I saw in Samoa, the
Samoan bird is figured with the name of P. fasciatus, Peale.

Now, Mr. Editor, my Fyian-killed specimens are in the
hands of Lord Walden and others; and Mr. Whitmee’s Samoan
birds are in Canon Tristram’s care; I doubt not original de-
scriptions are accessible to you: will you help us wanderers
and sojourners in “foreign parts”? to “ unravel the tangled
skein of our doubts.”

Yours &c.,
EK. L. Layarp.

P.S. There is no question that Lobiospiza notabilis, F. & H.,
is the young of Erythrura cyanovirens, Peale. The same
peculiarities characterize the young of our Fijian EL. pealii,
Hartl. |

S1r,—I have just received for inspection from Count Turati
a bird which, on the original label of the unknown collector,
bears written, “ Tatare viridis 2? , Viti Levu, Aug. 15.”

Letters, Announcements, &c. 007

This bird agrees pretty well with the description of Fatare ?
viridis, Layard, P. Z. S. 1875, pp. 150, 432; but it has nothing
to do with the genus Tatare, as it certainly belongs to the
genus Leptornis, and should stand as Leptornis viridis. I
have compared it with a specimen of Leptornis samoénsis
(Hombr. & Jacq.) im our Museum. It seems that Mr. Lay-
ard had some doubts about its proper position, as he has
put a query ‘after the generic name TJatare. The tongue
brushed at the tip, mentioned by Mr. Layard, shows most
evidently that the so-called Tatare viridis belongs to the
Meliphagide.

There is also a Leptornis aubryanus, Verr. & Des Murs,
from New Caledonia ; so that LZ. viridis makes the third species
known of the genus Leptornis.

I remain,
Yours very truly.
T. SALVADORI.

Turin, Sept. 18th, 1876.

Zoological Museum.

53 Carlyle Square, 8. W.
28th September, 1876.

Sir,—You lately handed me a letter from Dr. Severtzoff,
containing some remarks on the Porzana exquisita lately de-
scribed and figured in ‘The Ibis’ as a novelty from Chefoo
(North China); and you asked me to make what remarks I
thought necessary in reply. The better to make these intel-
ligible, I will quote what Dr. Severtzoff says in his letter about
my bird.

“My name of Porzana undulata, Prjev. et Severtz., has
priority over P. exquisita, Swinh., lbis, 1875, p. 185. The
bird and eggs are described in the Journ. f. Orn. 1873, p. 107,
by Taczanowski under the erroneous name of P. erythro-
thorax; this I corrected, after examination, to Porzana un-
dulata (Journ. f. Orn. 1874, p. 833) * * * * I altered the
name after having seen Taczanowski’s type. Prjevalski’s
bird was distinguished by myself in 1870 as new; but my
manuscript description, intended for his work, was delayed

SER. I1I.—VOL. VI. 2 N

508 Letters, Announcements, &c.

printing till his return from China. The name only was
printed in a catalogue of the birds of his Ussuri voyage as
early as 1870.

“ Accordingly, my name, printed 1870, Taczanowski’s de-
scription, published in 1873, my application of my name to
his description, 1874, and Mr.Swinhoe’s description and figure,
1875, all apply to the same bird. This shows also the range
of the bird in the breeding-season :—Darasun, in Dauria, fe-
male and eggs, summer, 1868 (Dybowsky); Ussuri (Prjevalski),
a male, summer, 1868 ; Chefoo, North China (Swinhoe), May
1873.”

This would certainly appear to show that Dr. Severtzoff’s
name for this Crake has priority over mine; but you have
drawn my attention to the fact that the bird had been pre-
viously described by me in the Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 4,
xil. p. 376 (Nov. 1873) ; and I now recollect that before leaving
Chefoo I sent a note of my novelties to the ‘ Annals,’ and on
my return to England, forgetting all about having done so, I
wrote an article on the birds met with at Chefoo for ‘The
Ibis,’ redescribing some of the novelties, without ever refer-
ring to what had already been published in the ‘ Annals.’
I can only attribute my forgetfulness to trouble I had to go
through at the time, if that be sufficient excuse. I certainly
deserve to lose the priority of naming this bird; but the laws
of nomenclature are on my side. <A Thrush I described at
the same time in the ‘ Annals’ as Turdus campbelli, I de-
scribed again in ‘The Ibis’ as 7. chrysopleurus. Severtzoff
now shows me this is 7. pelios, Bp. Hemipodius chryso-
stomus, also described in the same ‘ Annals,’ p. 875, I have
since made out to be only the summer plumage of Turnix
maculosa, Vieill. Thus the only novelty left to me is Por-
zana exquisita; and I presume I may claim a right to that.

Yours &c.,
Rosert SwInHoE.

Acanthylis caudacuta,
331, 356.
sylvatica, 356.
Accentor alpinus, 91, 92.
altaicus, 91, 92.
atrogularis, 91.
fulvescens, 91.
—— modularis, 22.
montanellus, 91,

Accipiter gularis, 330.
melanoleucus, 423.
nisus, 111, 342.
rhodogaster, 278.
rufiventris, 422.
stevensoni, 278.
virgatus, 278, 342.
Aceros plicatus, 357.
pusaran, 357.
tickelli, 357.
Acredula irbii, 22.
tephronota, 172.
Acridiornis lanceolata,

90.

locustella, 90.

straminea, 90.

Acrocephalus arundina-
ceus, 83.

brunnescens, 83.

— dumetorum, 84, 86.

orientalis, 41.
palustris, 84, 85,
86

schcenobzenus, 90.

sogdianensis, 79.

streperus, 83, 86.

Actitis hypoleuca, 27,
292. |

incanus, 393.

Actodromas albescens,

Aichmophorus major
165.

Aedon familiaris, 80.

galactodes, 80.

/Rgialitis cantiana, 328.

INDEX.

Aigialitis curonica, 328.

dubia, 51.

—— fluviatilis, 290.

hiaticula, -26, 289,
327.

— minor, 328.

Adgithalus atricapillus,
172, 174.

castaneus, 173.

coronatus, 172, 173,

175.

jaxartica, 175.
macronyx, 172, 174,

—— pectoralis, 175.
pendulinus, 172,
173, 174.
rutilans, 172, 175.
stoliczkee, 1'72.
Aathopyga cara, 348.
eupogon, 42, 348.
miles, 347.
Ageleeus thilius, 159.
Ailurcedus arfakianus,
258.
buccoides, 258.
maculosus, 258.
melanotis, 258.
Alauda arborea, 26.
arvensis, 26, 99, 119,

cristata, 182.
deva, 499.
dulcivox, 499.
— gulgula, 181, 499.
inconspicua, 181.
intermedia, 181.
triborhyncha, 181,
499.
Alcea torda, 99.
Alcedo bengalensis, 320.
ispida, 19, 99, 520.
semitorquata, 425,
Alcyone pusilla, 247.
Alseonax latirostris, 43.
Amadina optata, 151.

Ammoperdix bonhami,
323

Ampelis garrulus, 99,
188, 219.

Amydrus morio, 205,
433.

Amytis goyderi, 259.

Anas acuta, 420, 443.

boschas, 28, 419,

443.

clypeata, 420, 442.

crecca, 335, 419,

443.

falcata, 335.
penelope, 335, 420,

441

aes querquedula, 419.

rutila, 419.
sparsa, 433.
strepera, 382, 419.
superciliosus, 393.
—— tadorna, 419.
Andropadus flavostriatus,
53, 427.
—— gracilirostris, 53.
importunus, 427.
Anous cinereus, 156, 393,
leucocapillus, 393.
stolidus, 266, 393.
Anser albifrons, 417,
418,
arvensis, 417.
cineraceus, 417.
cinereus, 417, 418.
cygnoides, 417, 418.
grandis, 416.
indicus, 418, 419.
—— medius, 417, 418.
middendorfli, 416,
417.
— minutus, 418.
obscurus, 417, 418,
segetum, 335, 383,
417, 418, 441.
skorniakovi, 418,
419.

2nN2

510

Anthothreptus flammax- |
illaris, 348.

malaccensis, 348.

Anthreptes malaccensis,

Anthropoides stanley-
anus, 191, 209.

Anthus agilis, 180, 499.

aquaticus, 180.

arboreus, 179, 501,

504.

brachyceutrus, 179.

campestris, 178.

capensis, 426.

——eerviniss118,, 121;
122, 180, 500.

intermedius, 179.

maculatus, 499,

504.

microrhynchus, 180,

neglectus, 501.

orientalis, 179.
ratensis, 23, 120,

179, 180, 500, 501, 502,

503.

pyrrhonotus, 426.

rosaceus, 500, 502,

503.

rufogularis, 180.

rufus, 158.

seebohmi, 120, 180,
501.

—— spinoletta, 180,
501.

trivialis, 23, 120,
179, 180, 499.

Apalis thoracica, 202.

Aplonis tabuensis, 147.

vitiensis, 392.

Aprosinictus insignissi-
mus, 258,

Aquila chrysaetus, 110,
382.

clanga, 500, 504.

—— fulvescens, 339,
504.

imperialis, 339.

maculata, 504.

—— nevia, 339, 500.

nipalensis, 500.

strophiata, 370.

Arachnothera aurata,
347.

Archibuteo cryptogenys,
370, 372.

ferrugineus, 376.

hemiptilopus, 370,

$71, 372.

lagopus, 372, 375.

sancti-johannis,

374, 375.

INDEX.

Archibuteo strophiatus,
370, 371, 372.

Ardea alba, 325.

albolineata, 265.

ardesiaca, 210.

atricollis, 193.

brag, 325.

— bubuleus, 193, 211.

cinerea, 27, 99, 192,
325, 335.

=== ¢9col, 162.

—— egretta, 193, 210.

garzetta, 193, 210.

goliath, 193.

javanica, 393.

leucoptera, 193,

melanorhyncha,

325.

purpurea, 193, 210,

325.

sacra, 156, 365,

293.

sibilatrix, 162.

Ardeola comata, 27.

Ardetta eurhythma, 335.

involucris, 162.

—— minuta, 27, 193,
211, 326.

Artamus leucogaster,
133.

leucorhynchus, 45.

maximus, 248.

— melaleucus, 133.

— mentalis, 392.

papuensis, 248.

Arundinax blakistoni,
302,

doriz, 332.

fasciolatus, 332.

Asio accipitrinus, 112.

Astrapia gularis, 246,
249, 250.

Astur cruentatus, 144,
256, 383, 391.

leucosoma, 246.

—— plumbarius, 111.

polyzonoides, 195.

rufitorques, 384,

391.

trivirgatus, 32,

Asturina leucorrhoa, 480.
magnirostris, 480.
nitida, 480, 483.
plagiata, 480, 483.
-—— saturata, 481.
Asturinula meridionalis,
484,
—— monogrammica,

484.

Athene radiata, 343.
Atticora cyanoleuca, 158.
holomelas, 424.

Balearica regulorum, 192,
209.

Batis capensis, 203, 433.

pristinaria, 433.

Batrachostomus affinis,
305.

moniliger, 355.

Baza lophotis, 341.

Bernicla leucopsis, 417.

picta, 418.

ruficollis, 418.

— torquata, 418.

Bessonornis gutturalis,

Botaurus stellaris, 27,
193, 2) i320;

Boucieria conradi, 6.

fulgidigula, 6.

inca, 7.

insectivora, 5.

prunellii, 58.

Brachypodius immacula-
tus, 39.

melanocephalus,

Brachypteryx malaccen-
sis, 40.

Bradypterus barratti, 53,
202, 426.

cettii, 89.

Bubo bengalensis, 342.

coromandus, 342.

ignavus, 112.

—— maculosus, 132, 192,
196.

Bucco capensis, 99.

Buceros bicornis, 356.

ruficollis, 252, 359,
361.

Buchanga czrulescens,
128.

Budytes boarula, 22.

calearatus, 502.

cinereocapilla, 22.

citreola, 128, 178.

flava, 22, 178.

— melanota, 178.

novee-guines, 363.

rayi, 500. _

viridis, 117, 122,

Buphaga africana, 99.

Busarellus nigricollis,
485, 486.

Butalis ferrugineus, 352.

undulata, 203.

Butastur indicus, 234. —

teesa, 342.

Buteo abbreviatus, 67,
231.
albicaudatus, 67, 71,

albonotatus, 282.
augur, 467.
auguralis, 467,
— borealis, 231, 238,
236, 237.
brachypterus, 365.
brachyura, 477, 480.
calurus, 236, 237,
238, 241.
—— capensis, 366,
cooperi, 241.
costaricensis, 239.
desertorum, 126,
231, 366, 367.
elegans, 232.
erythronotus, 68,
69, 70, 73, 76.
exsul, 69, 76.
ferox, 242, 367,
368.
fuliginosus, 234,
235, 477, 478, 479,
480.
galapagensis, 76.
harlani, 240.
hemilasius, 369, 370.
— hydrophilus, 469.
—— hypospodius, 73, 76.
jakal, 195, 423, 467.
japonicus, 366, 369.
krideri, 239.
lagopus, 110.
latissimus, 233, 234.
leucasanus, 239.
— lineatus, 232.
— minutus, 477.
— montanus, 236.
—— nigricans, 368.
— obsoletus, 233.
—— pennsylvanicus, 234.
—— plumipes, 369.
—— poliosomus, 68, 70,
73, 76.
-—— pterocles, 161.
solitarius, 230.
swainsoni, 233, 284,
236, 369, 477.
unicolor, 242.
varius, 69.
— vulgaris, 236, 364,
366, 367, 382.
zonocercus, 231,
232.
Buteogallus eequinoctia-
lis, 485.
Buteola brachyura, 477,
478, 479.

INDEX.

Buteola minuta, 477.
Butorides javanica, 52.

Caccabis chukar, 323.

rubra, 26.

Cacomantis merulinus,
34.

sepulchralis, 34.

Calamodyta aquatica, 20.

arundinacea, 19.

——- doria, 41.

insularis, 332.

-—— maacki, 382.

melanopogon, 20.

phragmitis, 20, 218.

Calamoherpe phragmitis,
90

Calandrella brachydac-
tyla, 182.

leucophea, 182.

pispoletta, 182.

tenuirostris, 182.

Calidris arenaria, 164,
309, 411.

Calliope bailloni, 78.

pectoralis, 78.
Calliphlox amethystina,
398, 401.
amethystoides, 398.
mitchelli, 398, 399.
Calliste albiventris, 407.
—— argyrofenges, 408.
brasiliensis, 407.
—— cabanisi, 407.
cucullata, 410.
—— cyanescens, 410.
— cyanotis, 407, 408.
desmaresti, 410.
—— dowi, 407.
— florida, 407, 409.
frantzii, 407.
fulvicervix, 408.
—— gyrola, 410.
—— gyroloides, 410.
hartlaubi, 410, 407.
labradorides, 409.
lavinia, 407, 409.
— melanotis, 408.
nigriviridis, 410.
—— punctulata, 408.
— sclateri, 407.
—— tatao, 410.
yeni, 410.
Callolophus malaccensis,

35.

puniceus, 38.

Calorhamphus fuligino-
sus, d4.

Calornis affinis, 46.

cantoroides, 47.

caitschatkensis, 78.

ol}

Calornis chalybea, 45.

—— crassirostris, 46.

—— gularis, 47.

—— metallica, 47.

—— minor, 48.

—— mysolensis, 47.

—— neglecta, 46.

—— nitida, 48.

—— obscura, 46.

—— pacifica, 47.

—— panayensis, 46.

—— purpurascens, 47.

—— tytleri, 46.

—— viridescens, 47, 48.

Calothorax mitchelli, 400.

Campephaga caledonica,
263.

—— strenua, 259, 277.

Camptostoma imberbe,
497.

Cancroma cochlearia, 99.

Capito maculicoronatus,
495.

—— squamatus, 494,

Caprimulgus arenicolor,
190.

—— asiaticus, 355.

—— europeus, 99, 190,
197, 423.

—— indicus, 190.

isabellinus, 190.

—— jotaka, 331.

—— mahrattensis, 190,
305.

—-— pallens, 189, 190.

—— rufigena, 424.

smithi, 423.

—— stictomus, 190.

Carbo continentalis, 414.

—— pygmeeus, 414.

Carduelis elegans, 25.

Carpodacus erythrinus,
115

Carpophaga senea, 51.

cikrecaees 253.

—— latrans, 138, 149,
392.

pacifica, 263, 392.

~-— spilorrhoa, 361.

Casuarius occipitalis,
245.

-—— papuanus, 258.

—— tricarunculatus,
245.

uniappendiculatus,
244,

—— westermanni, 245,
258.

Catharma orthura, 400,
401

Centrococeyx javensis, 34.

eT Se”

LES Ce. Lees

}
ia
4
t
:
a
/ {
if
a

512

Centropus intermedius,

Cerchneis amurensis,
126.
rupicoloides, 196.
—— tinnunculoides, 196.
——— tinnunculus, 126.
Certhia discolor, 346.
familiaris, 19, 99,
176.
—— himalayana, 176..
pinus, 170.
teniura, 176.
Ceryle maxima, 133.
—— rudis, 331.
Cettia albiventris, 89.
fusca, 89.
—— nigricans, 90.
orientalis, 89.
—— scalenura, 89.
stoliezkse, 89.
Ceyx solitaria, 360, 363.
Chalcoparia pheenicotis,

Chalcophaps chrysochlo-
ra, 264.
stefani, 253.
Chaptia malayana, 45.
Charadrius fulvus, 51,
265, 393.
—— pluvialis, 221, 327.
squatarola, 327.
Charmosyna arfaki, 253.
josephine, 363.
papuensis, 259.
pulchella, 363.
Chaulelasmus streperus,
419.
Chauna chavaria, 162.
Chelidon lagopoda, 188.
urbica, 19, 356.
Chera progne, 191, 206,
207.
Chettusia gregaria, 328.
leucura, 328.
Chibia hottentata, 352.
Chlamydodera cervini-
ventris, 256.
xanthogastra, 267.
Chloropeta natalensis,
202, 428, 429.
Chotoreamystacophonus,
35.

versicolor, 35.

Chrysococcyx meyeri,
258.

Chryscena luteovirens,
392.

victor, 139, 151, 388,

292.
—— viridis, 153, 392.

INDEX.

Chrysomitris citrinella,
25.

magellanica, 159.

Chrysonotus biddulphi,
344.

Cicinnurus regius, 360,
363.

Ciconia alba asiatica, 324.

azretti, 324.

: boyciana, 325.

maguari, 162.

—— mycteriarhyncha,

nigra, 324.
Cinclus albicollis, 23.
alpinus, 335.
aquaticus, 23.
asiaticus, 175.
cashmiriensis, 175.
leucogaster, 175.
Cinnyris afra, 425.
amethystina, 425.
chalybea, 425.
Circaetus solitarius, 490.
Circus seruginosus, 18,
30, 31, 126.
approximans, 384.
assimilis, 384, 391.
cyaneus, 18, 111,
82

gouldi, 384.

—— macrurus, 195.

jardinii, 384.

—— macrocelis, 130,278.

—— maillardi, 31, 129,
279.

—— melanoleucus, 126,
127, 130.

—— pygargus, 195.

spilonotus, 30, 31.

swainsoni, 342.

wolfi, 384.

Cisticola schcenicola, 19.

Clangula glaucion, 421.

histrionica, 335.

Climacteris placens, 258.

Coccothraustes vulgaris,
382.

Coccystes glandarius, 191.

jacobinus, 200, 432.

Coceyzus glandarius, 200.

Ceeligena purpurea, 59.

typica, 55.

—— wilsoni, 59.

Colius capensis, 204.

striatus, 204.

Collocalia francica, 284,
356.

nidifica, 356.

—— spodiopygia, 391.

—— terre-regine, 259,

Collocalia uropygialis,
260.

vanicoroensis, 391.
Columba egyptiaca, 322.
arquatrix, 433.
—— chinensis, 321.
— fusca, 321.
gelastes, 321.
—— guinee, 208.
intermedia, 321.
livia, 26, 321.
—— cenas, 321.
palumbus, 26.
—— pulehricollis, 320.
risoria, 321.
rupestris, 321.
— turtur, 32].
—— yitiensis, 392.
Columbula picui, 163.
Colymbus arcticus, 455.
septentrionalis, 455.
Copsychus amcenus, 37,
8

andamanensis, 37.
— mindanensis, 37, 38.
problematicus, 36.
saularis, 37.
Coracias caudata, 198.
garrula, 64, 198,
319, 424.
—-— indica, 63.
papuensis, 247.
Coracopsis barklyi, 282,
288.
— mascarinus, 289.
niger, 285.
vasa, 284.
Corvultur albicollis, 433.
Corvus corax, 24, 99, 112.
cornix, 24, 113.
—— corone, 24.
—- frugilegus, 113.
monedula, 113.
Corydon sumatranus, 48,
Corythaix musophaga,
193, 199, 432.
Corythorniscyanostigma,
198, 425.
Corythus enucleator, 115.
Cossypha bicolor, 427.
caffra, 201, 428.
gutturalis, 78.
Coturnix baldami, 323.
communis, 26, 3238.
dactylisonans, 208,
433.
vulgaris, 323.
Cotyle cincta, 424.
concolor, 356.
fuligula, 424.
—— palustris, 424.

Cotyle riparia, 19, 189,
220.

rupestris, 19, 189,
306.

Cracticus crassirostris,
248

Crateropus jardinii, 201.

Crax alector, 99.

Crex pratensis, 413.

sia pheeocephalus,

——— splendens, 352.
Crithagra canicollis, 431.
scotops, 431.
—— sulphurata, 431.
Crotophaga ani, 99.
Cuculus canorus, 26, 99,
112, 199, 320.
castaneus, 345.
cupreus, 199.
infuseatus, 391.
leucolophus, 253.
maculatus, 345.
— merulinus, 345.
micropterus, 345,
simus, 144, 391.
solitarius, 433.
—— sparverioides, 345.
—— striatus, 345.
xanthorhynchus,
345.
Curruca atricapilla, 21.
cinerea, 20.
Cursorius bicinctus, 212.
gallicus, 280.
senegalensis, 433.
Cyanalcyon macleayi,
256.
Cyanecula suecica, 125.
wolfi, 21.
Cyanoderma bicolor, 40.
erythropterum, 40.
Cyanomyia cyaneicollis,
312, 316.
eyanocephala, 312,

—— francie, 312, 316.

guatemalensis, 315.

—— microrhyncha, 312.
316.

—— quadricolor, 312.

violiceps, 312.

viridifrons, 312,314.

Cyanops franklini, 344.

Cyanotis azarze, 160.

Cyclopsitta gulielmi-ter-
tii, 253.

maccoyi, 258.

Cygnopsis canadensis,
417.

Cyguus altumi, 416.

INDEX.

Cygnus bewicki, 488, 440.

coscoroba, 163.

—— musicus, 416, 437.

-nigricollis, 163.

olor, 416.

Cymbirhynchus affinis,
49,

—— macrorhynchus, 48,

malaccensis, 277.
Cynanthus cyanurus, 10.
Cyornis rubeculoides, 353.
—— unicolor, 353.
Cypselus affinis, 189.
apus, 18, 189, 424.
caffer, 197, 424.
melba, 189, 424.
—— murarius, 189.
pacificus, 331, 356.
vittatus, 356.

Dafila acuta, 420.

bahamensis, 163.

spinicauda, 163.

Dasyptilus pecqueti, 244,
252) 4

Dendrochelidon comata,

longipennis, 33.

Dendrocygna vagans,393.

viduata, 214.

Dendrophila corallina,
346.

frontalis, 346.

Dendropicus cardinalis,
200.

—— menstruus, 200.

Diczeum chrysorrheum,
349, 350.

cruentatum, 349.

—— minimum, 349, 350.

trigonostigma, 42,

virescens, 349,
Dicrurus annectens, 352.
balicassius, 352.
musicus, 204.
Didus ineptus, 99.
Diomedea exulans, 99.
melanophrys, 393.
Diphyllodes chrysoptera,
245, 249, 259.
gulielmi-tertii, 244,
249, 257, 259, 278, 358.
—— magnifica, 277.
respublica, 363.
speciosa, 245, 251,
259, 277.
—— wilsoni, 244, 251.
Dissemurus albertisi, 246,
250, 258.

o138

Dissemurus brachypho-
rus, 45,

Dromas ardeola, 280.

Drymochera badiceps,
394.

Drymeeca chiniana, 425.

eracilis, 80.

—— hypoxantha, 425.

inquieta, 80.

—— jerdoni, 280.

levaillanti, 425.

Drymeedus affinis, 358.

Dryocopus martius, 112.

Dryoscopus boulboul,
204, 430.

Dysporus sula, 393.

Kctopistes migratorius,

Egretta modesta, 335.

Elanus ceruleus, 196,
423,

Emberiza borbonica, 284.

cirlus, 25.

—— citrinella, 116.

—— hortulana, 25.

— miliaria, 25.

pusilla, 116, 128.

rustica, 128, 333.

scheeniclus, 25, 117.

Enneoctonus collaris,
430.

Entomobia pileata, 33.

Ephialtes scops, 348.

Epimachus ellioti, 244,
249, 358.

—— maximus, 246, 249,
250.

veithii, 258.

Eriocnemis vestita, 10.

Erismatura dominica,
163.

ferruginea, 163.

—— leucocephala, 28,
421.

Hrithacus rubecula, 21.

Erythropus vespertinus,
132.

Erythrosterna maculata, |
350.

Erythrotriorchis radia-
tus, 65.

Erythrura cyanovirens, *
506.

—— pealii, 151, 392, 506.

—— prasina, 50.

Estrelda astrild, 208, 433.

cyanogastra, 207.

Eudromias caspius, 327.

——~ crassirostris, 327.

—— geoffroyi, 327.

= = far ~
= ——— aie =]
LS eae!

SIS. ee ee

ayn er ee ee q

514.

Eudromias modesta, 164.

mongolicus, 327.

—— morinellus, 289,
S21:

Eudynamys malayana,
34

taitiensis, 144, 391.
Eumyias melanops, 353.
Eupetes czerulescens, 363.
Euplectes capensis, 192,
206.
oryx, 192, 207.
rufovelatus, 462.
taha, 191, 206.
Eupodotis afra, 192.
—— kori, 133.
scolopacea, 192.
Eupsychortyx leucotis,

Eurylemus javanicus, 48.
ochromelas, 48, 355.
Eurystomus gularis, 247.
pacificus, 247.
Euscarthmus granaden-
sis, 494.

ocularis, 493.
Eutrygon terrestris, 253.

Falcinellus igneus, 162.

Falcirostra kauffmanni,
329,

—— longipes, 329.

Falco sesalon, 111.

biarmicus, 425.

‘-chiquera, 126.

—— gyrfaleo, 234.
—— herbecola, 342.
—— holbeelli, 233.
islandicus, 284.
lathami, 340.
—— latissimus, 234.
leucauchen, 2.
—— lunulatus, 391.
—— meridionalis, 66.
—— nisosimilis, 342.
obsoletus, 234.
peregrinator, 126,
342, 339.

peregrinus, 18, 110.
— pecilonotus, 472.
severus, 126.
subbuteo, 111.
—— tinnunculus, 18.
Ficedula fulvescens, 82.
middendorffi, 81.
obscura, 82.
superciliosus, 81.
Fiscus collaris, 429.
Formicivora speciosa,

494

communis, 126, 127.

INDEX.

Formicivora strigilata,
494.

Francolinus afer, 192,208.

levaillanti, 483.

—— natalensis, 209.

—— nudicollis, 209, 433.

- —— swainsoni, 209.

Fringilla coelebs, 24, 99.
—— montifringilla, 116.
Fulica atra, 28, 99, 413.
cristata, 213.
Fuligula clangula, 445.
—— cristata, 28, 420,
445.
ferina, 420.
— fusca, 420.
leucophthalma, 421.
— marila, 444.
rufina, 421.
Furnarius rufus, 160.

Galerida cristata, 26.
Galerita cristata, 182.
Gallinago zequatorialis,
212, 438.
frenata, 164.
—— gallinula, 27.
macrodactyla, 433.
media, 27.
Gallinula chloropus, 27,
213, 335, 4138.
porzana, 413.
pusilla, 413.
yemea, 413.
Gallus bankiva, 324.
domesticus, 152.
ferrugineus, 324.
Gambetta flavipes, 165.
Garrulus glandarius, 24,
62, 333.
japonicus, 334.
krynicki, 62.
lidthi, 323, 334.
Gavia ichthyaetus, 415.
minuta, 415.
ridibunda, 415.
Geranoaetus melanoleu-
cus, 66.
Geronticus zthiopicus,
211.
Glareola limbata, 328.
melanoptera, 212.
orientalis, 51.
pratincola, 328.
Glaucidium brodiei, 343.
-—— californicum, 11,13.
cobanense, 15.
elata, 14.
ferox, 11, 15.
ferrugineum, 11, 12,
14, 15

Glaucidium gnoma, 11,
12, 13.

griseiceps, 11, 16.
infuscatum, 11, 15.
jardinn, 11,92, 14.
lansbergi, 11, 14.
nanum, 11, 12, 15.
passerinum, 11, 12,

phalenoides, 11, 15.

—— pumilum, 1], 16.

ridgwayi, 11, 15.

siju, 11, 12, 17.

Glyciphila subfasciata,
363.

Gorsachius melanolo-
phus, 335.

Goura coronata, 256.

—— scheepmakeri, 256.

victories, 254, 256,
309.

Graculus africanus, 214.

carbo, 214.

melanognathus,
280.

Grallina bruijni, 358.

Grus cinerea, 60, 311,

324.
— communis, 324.
leucogeranus, 324.
virgo, 324.
Gygis alba, 393.
candida, 266.
Gymnocorvus senex, 248.
Gymnocrex, 385.
Gymnophaps albertisi,
244, 253.
Gypaetus barbatus, 276.
meridionalis, 423.
Gyps bengalensis, 339.
indicus, 339.
kolbi, 132, 423.
rueppelli, 132.

Hematopus ostralegus,
99, 290, 329.

Halcyon albiventris, 198.

cassini, 391.

cyanocephala, 385.

—— gurial, 356.

—— julie, 260.

—— leucocephalus, 356.

nigrocyanea, 247,

pileata, 33.

sacra, 391.
sanctus, 261.
smyrnensis, 64.
Haliaetus albicilla, 110.
fulviventer, 342.
leucogaster, 542.

Haliaetus trivirgatus,342

Haliastur indus, 32.

—— intermedius, 32.

Hapalocercus flaviventris,
159

Harelda glacialis, 445.

Harpactes fasciatus, 355.

orescius, 355.

Harpyhaliaetus corona-
tus, 490, 491, 492.

solitarius, 490, 491,
492.

Harpyopsis novee-guiner,
256.

Heliangelus viola, 317.

/——- squamigularis, 318.

Helinaia bachmani, 170.

Heliodoxa leadbeateri, 7.

otero, 7.

Heliothrix auriculatus,
395, 396.

auritus, 395.

barroti, 395, 397.

—— longirostris, 395.

—— phainolema, 396.

purpureiceps, 397.

— — violifrons, 397.

Heliotrypha barrali, 317,
318.

exortis, 317, 318.

parzudakii, 317,318.

viola, 317.

Helminthophaga bach-
mani, 167, 168, 170.

celata, 167, 168,
170.

—— chrysoptera, 167,
168, 170.

— gutturalis, 167.

lawrencii, 167, 168,

170.

leucobronchialis,

167, 168, 170.

lucie, 167, 168, 170.

lutescens, 169, 170.

peregrina, 167, 169,
170.

——- pinus, 167, 168,170.

ruficapilla, 167, 168,

170.

virginix, 167, 168,
170.

Helotarsus ecaudatus,
423.

Hemiaetos strophiatus,
370.

Hemicercus canente, 344.

Hemipodius chrysosto-
mus, 508.

Hemipus obscurus, 302,

picatus, 352.

INDEX.

Henicophaps albifrons,
253.

Henicurus ruficapillus,42.

Herodias alba, 27.

Herpornis brunnescens,

41.

xantholeuca, 41.
Heterospizias meridiona-
lis, 66.
Hierax czerulescens, 32.
Himantopus brasilianus,
164.
candidus, 329.
melanopterus, 383.
Hirundo albigula, 424.
alpestris, 188.
—— americana, 331.
—— cucullata, 424.
domestica, 188, 381.
— domicola, 356.
—— erythrogaster, 331.
—— erythropygia, 338.
—— gutturalis, 331.
horreorum, 831.
javanica, 43, 338,
306.
lagopoda, 188.
leucorrhoa, 158.
rufula, 188, 381.
rustica, 18, 99, 188,
203, 220, 331, 381, 424.
tahitica, 391.
Hoplopterus armatus,
ie
coronatus, 191.
Huhua orientalis, 343.
Hydrochelidon hybrida,
416.
leucopareia, 416.
nigra, 416.
Hyphantornis capensis,
206.
erythrocephalus,
5

ocularis, 431.

rubriceps, 466.

Hypochera chalybeata,
207.

Hypolais caligata, 86,
499, 504.

graminis, 81.

languida, 79.

pallida, 504.

rama, 86, 499, 504.

Hypsibates himantopus,
329.

Hypsipetes borbonica,
284.

Ibidorhynchus struthersi,
29.

This falcinellus, 326.
strictipennis, 361.
Tole olivacea, 40.
tympanistrigus, 38.
Tora lafresnayi, 351,
typhia, 351.
zeylanica, 351.
Iotreron melanospila,
385.
xanthorrhoa, 385.
Irania albigula, 78.
Irena cyanea, 44.
cyanogastra, 44,
— puella, 44.
turcosa, 44, 45.
Irrisor erythrorhynchus,
133, 199.

Jynx torquilla, 99, 320.

Ketupa ceylonensis, 343.
javanensis, 343.

Lagonosticta rubricata,

Lagopus albus, 220.
Lalage nevia, 263.
terat, 144, 392.
Lamprococcyx lucidus,
256.
Lamprocolius pheenico-
pterus, 206.
Lamprolia minor, 155,
388, 390, 392.
victoris, 139, 148,
149, 154, 390, 392.
Lampropygia boliviana,
54, 55, 57.
ceeligena, 54, 55.
columbiana, 54, 55,

57.
—— prunelli, 54, 55, 58.
—— purpurea, 54, 56,
59

wilsoni, 54, 55, 59.
Laniarius atrococcineus,
1338, 204.
—— rubiginosus, 430.
Lanius auriculatus, 24. .
bucephalus, 381.
collaris, 205.
collurio, 185, 205.
collurioides, 352.
—w— dominicanus, 135.
erythronotus, 184.
— excubitor, 99, 183,
184.
homeyeri, 184,
— hypoleucus, 352.
isabellinus, 185,
leucopterus, 184,

‘Wh |

|
|

Bi Pati
t
ai |
sd tt i Vin
Me ty is
ieee |) i!
reat |
mt |
i
4
ih
ei
4

516

Lanius leucopygius, 184.
leucorhynchus, 133,
135.
lucionensis, 43, 44.
major, 184,
- manillensis, 135.
— minor, 184.
—— montana, 185.
—— pallidirostris, 184.
—— pheenicuroides, 187.
—— pheenicurus, 185,
186.
ruficeps, 187.
schach, 184.
—— schwaneri, 43, 44.
superciliosus, 331.
Larus affinis, 451, 452,
455.
argentatus, 415,
53.

cachinnans, 415.
canus, 29, 415, 451.
cirrhocephalus, 165.
— dominicanus, 165.
fuscescens, 61.
fuscus, 61.
glaucus, 4538.
ichthyaetus, 415.
—~-- leucophzus, 29, 61,
415, 453.
maculipennis, 165.
—— marinus, 452.
—— melanocephalus,
61.
—— minutus, 415.
—— niveus, 335.
occidentalis, 452.
ridibundus, 29, 165,
385, 415.
sp. ?, 393.
Leadbeatera grata, 7.
otero, 7.
splendens, 7.
Leptopecile sophiz, 171.
Leptornis aubryanus, 507.
samoensis, 507.
—— viridis, 507.
sp. ?, 392.
Leucippus chionogaster,

—— chlorocercus, 9.
leucogaster, 8.
pallidus, 8.
Leucophantes brachy-
urus, 358.
hypoxanthus, 358.
leucops, 358.
Leucopternis albicollis,
472, 474, 496.
—— ghiesbreghti, 470.
——— lacernulata, 474.

INDEX.

Leucopternis melanops,

occidentalis, 476,

palliata, 471, 474.

-—— plumbea, 470, 475.

—— princeps, 67.

semiplumbea, 475.

schistacea, 470.

Lichenops perspicillata,
159.

Ligurinus chloris, 25.
Limnaetus albiniger, 341.
albogularis, 341.
cristatellus, 340.
kieneri, 339, 340.
——- niveus, 339.
Limnocorax niger, 213.
Limosa zxgocephala, 292,
412.
baueri, 265.
— melanura, 412.
melanuroides, 265.
uropygialis, 393.
Linota canescens, 116.
cannabina, 25.
rufescens, 116.
Lioptilus nigricapillus,
208, 428.
Lobiospiza notabilis, 506.
Locustella fluviatilis, 90.
—— lanceolata, 90.
luscinioides, 89.
—— nevia, 90.
ochotensis, 332.
rubescens, 332.
subcerthiola, 332.
Lophogyps occipitalis,
132.

Lophophanes bicolor,
169.

Lophopsittacus mauri-
tianus, 282, 287, 289.

Lophorhina atra, 251.

Lophotriorchis kieneri,
126; Ze

Loriculus galgulus, 36.

Lorius hypeenochrous,
364.

solitarius, 141, 391.

Loxia curvirostra, 99.

Lusciniopsis savil, 3382.

Machetes pugnax, 292,
383, 410.

Machetornis rixosa, 159.
Macronus ptilosus, 40.
Macronyx croceus, 208.
Macropteryx comatus, 33.
longipennis, 33.
Macropygia sp. ?, 264.

Malimbus cassini, 458,
461.

cristatus, 457, 459.

melanotis, 457, 458,

465.

nigerrimus, 458,

—— nitens, 458, 463.
rachelizx, 458, 464.

rubriceps, 458, 459,
66

rubricollis, 457,
458, 461.
rufovelatus, 462.
scutatus, 457, 460.
Manucodia chalybeia,
358.
—— comrii, 364.
jobiensis, 358.
keraudreni, 252.
Mareca chiloensis, 163.
penelope, 28.
Mecistura poltzami, 172.
Megacephalon maleo,385.
Megalzma duvauceli, 35.
humii, 35.
—— indica, 345.
—— mystacophonus, 35.
—— philippensis, 345.
versicolor, 35.
Megalestes albonotatus,
255.
Megaloperdix minor, 323.
nigelli, 322.
Megalophonus apiatus,
133.
Megapodius geelvinkia-
nus, 254
Megarhynchus pitangua,
160

Meiglyptes jugularis,344.

tristis, 36.

tukki, 36.

Melanocorypha bimacu-
lata, 183.

calandra, 183.

— minor, 188.

sibirica, 183.

tartarica, 183.

yeltoniensis, 183.

Melanopitta lugubris,247,
259.

Meleagris gallopavo, 99.
Melidoramacrorhina,247.
Melierax gabar, 195.
niger, 192.
Melithreptus letior, 259.
Melizophilus sardus, 20.
Mellisuga coeligena, 55.
—— judith, 10.

—— prunellei, 58.

Mellisuga wilsoni, 59.

(Cynanthus) salvya-

dorii, 10.

(Hriocnemis) ridol-
fii, 10.

—— (Panoplites) judith,
10

Mergus albellus, 382, 421,
448

—— castor, 450.

merganser, 421.

serrator, 28, 450.

Merops apiaster, 19, 99,
319, 381.

bicolor, 33.

bullockoides, 197.

persicus, 319.

pusillus, 197.

—— superciliosus, 33,
197.

Merula bicolor, 153, 392.

tempesti, 392.

vanicorensis, 151.

vitiensis, 389, 390,
392.

Mesopicus menstruus,
432.

Metopiana peposaca, 16:3.

Micrastur brachypterus,
4,

concentricus, 1, 2, 3.
gilvicollis, 4.

—— guerilla, 2, 3, 4.
leucauchen, 1, 2, 4.
——~ macrorhynchus, 4.

— melanoleucus, l, 3,4.

—— mirandollii, 1, 3, 4.
pelzelni, 4.
ruficollis, 1, 2, 3, 4.
semitorquatus, 1,3,4.
xanthothorax, 4.
zonothorax, 2, 3, 4.
Microeca papuana, 363.
Microglossum alecto, 253.
aterrimum, 253.
Microglossus aterrimus,
359, 360.

Microhierax fringillarius.

Micronisus badius, 342.
poliopsis, 342.
Milvago chimachima, 231.
chimango, 161.
Milvulus tyrannus, 160.
Milvus govinda, 338, 342.
499,
ictinus, 18.
parasiticus, 423.
korshun, 196.
Mino dumonti, 250.
Mirafra africana, 432.

INDEX.

Molothrus bonariensis,
159.

Monachalcyon princeps
385.

Monachella saxicolina,
248.

Monarcha brehmi, 248.

lessoni, 144, 392.

Mormon cirrhatum, 335.

Motacilla alba, 22, 117,
125, 176.

chrysoptera, 170.

cinereocapilla, 178.

citreola, 178, 502.
citreoloides, 178,

— dukhunensis, 176.
flava, 178.
—— flavifrons, 178.
japonica, 177, 333.
madraspatana, 177.
melanocephala, 178.
melanope, 177.
melanota, 177.
personata, 177.
rayi, 178.
sulphurea, 177.
viridis, 178.
Munia atricapilla, 50.
Muscicapa atricapilla, 34.
collaris, 24.
griseola, 61, 99,
88

parva, 61, 128, 188.
Muscicapula sapphira,
53

ITEL

strophiata, 353.
superciliaris, 353.
Muscipeta castanea, 188.
Mycteria americana, 99.
Myiagra azureocapilla,
150, 389, 392.
castaneigularis, 389,
392.
— castaneiventris, 392.
concinna, 256.
melanura, 262.
Myiobius incanescens,
497.
pulcher, 497.
Myiolestes buaensis, 389,
390, 392.
— buensis, 145, 146.
compressirostris,
153, 392.
fortuns, 145, 146.
macrorhynchus, 138,
145, 146, 158, 389, 392.
maximus, 498.
vitiensis, 145, 146,
153, 389, 392.

517

Myzomela cardinalis, 261.
cruentata, 247.
-—— Jjugularis, 391.
nigriventris, 261,
391.

rosenbergi, 258.
sp.?, 261.

Napothera umbratilis,
ov7.
Nasiterna bruijni, 255,
308.
geelvinkiana, 253.
— maforensis, 358.
misorensis, 358.
Necropsittacus roderi-
canus, 287, 289.
Nectarinia amethystina,
208.
— chalybea, 202, 203,
famosa, 202, 425,
jugularis, 348.
seherix, 347.
zeylonica, 348.
Nectarophila hasselti, 348.
Neophron ginginianus,
126.

percnopterus, 423.
Niltava macgregoria, 353,
Nisaetus fasciatus, 126,
339.
pennatus, 373.
Nisus concentricus, 2.
Nothura maculosa, 165.
Numenius arquatus, 218,
412.
australis, 334.
femoralis, 389, 393.
—— major, 334.
— pheopus, 311.
uropygialis, 52.
Numida meleagris, 99.
Nyctale richardsoni, 13.
tengmalmi, 13.
Nyctiardea nycticorax,
325.
Nycticorax griseus, 193.
Nyroca ferruginea, 421.

Ocypterus leucorhynchus,
5.

Odontophorus cinctus,
379.

— thoracicus, 380.

(Kdemia cristata, 420.

— fusca, 420, 448.

nigra, 447.

Cidicnemus crepitans,
326.

senegalensis, 327.

(Ena capensis, 264.

oe Fear

oa Sa. iam

518

(Estrelata leucoptera, 393.
Onychotes gruberi, 476.
Oriolus capensis, 433,
galbula, 24, 99, 187,
205.
—— kundoo, 187.
larvatus, 205, 4383.
Ornismya amethystina,
398, 400.
ceeligena, 55.
cyanocephala, 314.
—— delphinz, 406.
nigrotis, 395.
—— orthura, 399, 400.
parzudakii, 318.
Ornithion imberbe, 497.
obsoletum, 497.
pusillum, 497.
Orthonyx nove-guines,
Orthotomus borneonensis,
41.
Ortygometra crex, 213.
porzana, 27.
—— quadristrigata, 393.
tabuensis, 393.
Otidiphaps nobilis, 254.
Otis macqueeni, 326.
tarda, 99, 326.
tetrax, 326.
Otocorys albigula, 181.
alpestris, 119, 181.
brandti, 181.
longirostris, 181.
penicillata, 181.
Otogyps auricularis, 194,
423.
calvus, 339.
Otus brachyotus, 18, 161.
vulgaris, 13.
wilsonianus, 13.

—— sp.?, 39].

Pachycare flavo-grisea,

863.

Pachycephala albifrons,
505.

chlorura, 263.

—— flavifrons, 505.

graefii, 146, 154, 391,

392, 505.

icteroides, 146, 154,

392, 505.

intermedia, 154,
392.

——? nigrogularis, 392.

schlegeli, 258.

torquata, 138, 146,

149, 154, 392.

vitiensis, 146, 154,
392.

Palzornis calthropex, 128.

INDEX.

| Palzornis eques, 283, 289.

—— exsul, 288.
-—— javanicus, 243.
—— melanorhynchus,

wardi, 282, 288.
Palumbus ecasiotis, 320.
Pandion haliaetus, 110,
331, 382.
Panoplites flavescens, 10.
Panurus barbatus, 94.
—— hiarmicus, 94.
Paradigalla carunculata,
246, 250.
Paradisea apoda, 99.
—— magnifica, 277.
—— papuana, 245.
raggiana, 256, 359,
360.
—— rubra, 252.
Parotia sexpennis, 250,
258.
sexsetacea, 246.
Parra jacana, 99.
Parula pitiayumi, 158.
Parus arfaki, 363.
ater, 22, 93.
atricapillus, 169.
bokharensis, 92.
borealis, 94.
ceeruleus, 22.
cinctus, 94, 219.
—— cyanus, 92, 93.
—— flavipectus, 92.
grisescens, 219.
—— kamchatkensis, 218.
lugubris, 94.
—— major, 22, 92.
—— melanolophus, 93.
—— palustris, 94.
—— rufipectus, 93.
— rufonuchalis, 93.
songarus, 93.
Passer cisalpinus, 25.
domesticus, 114.
hispaniolensis, 25.
montanus, 114.
Pavo cristatus, 99, 324.
Pelargopsis burmanicus,
356.
leucocephala, 33.
Pelecanus onocrotalus,99,
414.
Peltops blainvillii, 247,
258

Perdix barbata, 323.
cinerea, 323.
daurica, 323.
—— griseogularis, 323.
rubra, 382.
saxatilis, 323.

’ Phalaropus

Pericrocotus brevirosiris,
352.

Pericrocotus elegans, 352.

roseus, 352.

——- solaris, 352.

—— speciosus, 351.

Perisoreus infaustus, 113.

Peristera larvata,208,483.

Petasophora anais, 402,
403.

cabanidis, 404.

cabanisi, 404.

coruscans, 402, 405.

—- cyanotis, 402, 404.

—— delphine, 402, 406.

— iolata, 403.

— serrirostris,402, 406.

thalassina, 402, 404.

Petrocincla rupestris,427.

Petrocossyphus cyanus,
23.

Petreeca pusilla, 153.

Petroica pusilla, 262.

similis, 262.

vitiensis, 392.

Pezophaps solitaria, 288.

Phaeton ethereus,99, 393.

candidus, 3893.

rubricauda,266,393.

Phalacrocorax — brasilia-
nus, 162.

carbo, 414.

—— cristatus, 29.

-——— pygmeeus, 414.

angustiros-

tris, 411.

—— hyperboreus, 290,
4il.

Phaleris cristatella, 335.

Phasianus chrysomelas,
131.

—— colchicus, 99, 1382,
382.

—-— insignis, 132.

—— mongolicus, 131,323.

—— persicus, 131.

—— semitorquatus, 131.

—— shawi, 182.

Phedina borbonica, 284.

Philentoma pyrrhopie-
rum, 43.

Philomela luscinia, 21.

Phlegeenas jobiensis, 363.

Phlogeenas staiti, 392.

Pheenicaophaes curviros-
tris, 345,

erythrognathus,

Pheenicopterus roseus,
Ld.

ruber, 99.

Pholeoptynx cunicularia,
161.

Pholidauges verrauxi,
206.

Phyllopneuste inter-
media, 81.

tristis, 82.

Phyllornis chlorocepha-
lus, 351.

cyanopogon, 40.

javensis, 351.

—v— jerdoni, 351.

Phylloscopus borealis,
215, 216.

brevirostris, 218.

-—— eversmanni, 215.

hypolania, 499.

indicus, 82.

intermedia, 499.

magnirostris, 499.

-—— neglectus, 218, 505.

rufus, 21, 218.

—— sibilator, 21].

sibilatrix, 217.

superciliosus, 81,

128.

tristis, 217, 503.

trochilus, 21, 215,

216, 503.

viridanus, 81, 499.

xanthodryas, 332.

Pica media, 333.

rustica, 113.

Picoides tridactylus, 320.

Picus atratus, 343.

aurocristatus, 344.

cabanisi, 320.

leptorhynchus, 320,

386.

leucopterus, 386.

—— mahrattensis, 128,
344.

major, 320.

majoroides, 344.

martius, 99.

minor, 112.

tridactylus, 112,320.

Pindalis ruficapillus, 202, _

429.
Pionopsitta amazonina,
495, 496.
—— brachyura, 496.
—— melanotis, 495, 496.
pileata, 496.
pyrrhops, 495, 496.
Pipra leucocilla, 99.
Piprisoma agile, 350.
Pitta arcuata, 29.
maforeana, 248.
——— maxima, 259.
——— rosenbergi, 247.

INDEX.

Placellodromus frontalis,

ruber, 161.

Plangus neogeeus, 487,

Platalea leucorodia, 99,
326.

Platycercus hysginus,143.

—— koroensis, 391.
personatus, 143,144,

—— splendens, 148, 144,
390, 391.

—— tabuensis, 143, 388,
390, 391.

taviunensis, 141,

143, 391.

Platyrhynchus murinus,

Plectrophanes lapponi-
cus, 117.
nivalis, 118.
Ploceus cristatus, 459.
hzematocephalus,
465.
melanotis, 465.
—— nigerrimus, 464.
niger, 464.
nitens, 463.
oryx, 206.
pyrrhocephalus,

rubricollis, 461.
Plotus anhinga, 99.
—— congensis, 214.
Pnoepyga caudata, 353.
—— squamata, 353.
Podiceps auritus, 414.
cornutus, 414.
cristatus, 382, 414.
—— griseigena, 414.
— minor, 214, 383, 4138.
nigricollis, 29, 414.
—— rubricollis, 414.
Pogonocichla stellata,
203, 428.
Pogonorhynchus leuco-
melas, 200.
—— torquatus, 200.
Polioaetus humilis, 32.
—— ichthyaetus, 126,
341.
—— golitarius, 231.
Poliohierax semitorqua-
tus, 132.

Polioptila dumicola, 157.

Polyborus tharus, 161.

Polyphasia passerinus,
345.

—— rufiventris, 345.

Polytmus (Campylopte-
rus) ceciliz, 10.

519

Porphyrio aneiteumensis,
265.

indicus, 265.

—— melanotus, 266.

—— vyitiensis, 266, 393.

Porphyriops melanops,
163

Porzana bailloni, 413.
erythrothorax, 507.

exquisita, 335, 507,
08.

—— maruetta, 4138.
—— minuta, 413.
undulata, 507.
Potamodus cettii, 20.
Pratincola rubetra, 22.
rubicola, 22, 215,
503.
torquata, 201.
Prinia gracilis, 280.
Prionochilus gordoni,
350.
— maculatus, 48.
— modestus, 350.
thoracicus, 43.
Prionops talacoma, 205.
Procellaria czrulea, 393.
—— pelagica, 99.
Progne purpurea, 158.
Promerops gurneyi, 202,
425.
Psalidoprogne holomelx-
na, 204.
Psarisomus dalhousiz,
35D.
psittacinus, 355.
Psarolophus ardens, 351.
trailli, 351.
Psittacus mascarinus,
285, 286.
meyeri, 201.
—— niger, 285.
obscurus, 285.
Psitteuteles arfaki, 363.
placens, 363.
wilhelminz, 363.
Psophia crepitans, 99.
Pterocles alchata, 322.
arenarius, 280, 322.
—— senegallus, 280.
Pterolestes augur, 468.
auguralis, 467.
jakal, 469.
Ptiladela boyeri, 277.
Ptilinopus apicalis, 506.
— fasciatus, 392, 506.
perousii, 392, 506.
Ptilonopus aurantiifrons,
253.
—— bellus, 253.
celebensis, 385.

Say yrs eat ak EST RS

= ss 2 ee sage
a —porS = = = . - ms =

520
Ptilonopus chrysorrhoa,

geminus, 255, 386.
greyi, 264.
—— humeralis, 253.
jobiensis, 253.
—— marginalis, 386.
—— melanocephalus, ~
385.
—— miquelii, 253.
— musschenbroeckii,
253.
nanus, 259.
— nuchalis, 385.
ornatus, 253.
pectoralis, 233.
senex, 386.
speciosus, 253.
sulaensis, 385.
trigeminus, 386.
Ptilopus speciosus, 258.
Ptilorhis superbus, 252.
Ptiloskelos amherstii,343.
Ptilotis carunculata, 138,
141, 147, 389, 390, 391.
flavo-aurita, 148.
flavostriata, 259.
frenata, 259.
procerior, 147, 392.
provocator, 153,
155, 392.
similis, 147, 389,
390, 392.
Puffinus anglorum, 61.
—— nugax, 393.
yelkouan, 61.
Pycnonotus analis, 38.
euptilotis, 38.
--— golavier, 38.
—— nigricans, 428.
—— plumosus, 38.
—— pusillus, 38.
—— susanii, 38.
Pyrenestes albifrons,
207, 433.
Pyrgita petronia, 24.
Pyrocephalus rubineus,
160, 263.
Pyrrhula vulgaris, 115.

Querquedula circia, 28,
419.

—— crecca, 28, 419.

—— cyanoptera, 163.

Rallina peciloptera, 155,
393

Rallus aquaticus, 99, 27,
412.

cserulescens, 133.

eeruleus, 213.

INDEX.

‘| Rallus pectoralis, 393.

philippensis, 265.

Ramphodon anais, 403.

Recurvirostra avocetta,
99, 329.

Reguloides superciliosa,

Regulus cristatus, 92.
ignicapillus, 21.
Rhinopomastes cyano-
melas, 199.
Rhinortha chlorophea,
4

Rhipidura albiscapa, 262.

—— albicollis, 149, 392.

—— dryas, 259.

—— leucothorax, 256.

—— vidua, 246.

sp., 262.

Rhynchzea capensis, 212.

—— semicollaris, 164.

Rhynchops nigra, 99.

Rhynchotis rufescens,
166.

Rimator malacoptilus,
393.

Rollulus roulroul, 51.

Rupornis griseocauda,
482, 483.

—— magnirostris, 482.

nattereri, 481.

—— pucherani, 481.

ruficauda, 482.

Ruticilla aurorea, 78.

czruleocephala, 78.

—— erythrogastra, 77.

erythronota, 77.

erythroprocta, 77.

— lugens, 78.

—— mesoleuca, 64.

—— phenicurus, 21, 64,
77, 215.

semirufa, 77.

—— titys, 21.

Salicaria arundinacea, 83.
brevipennis, 83.
— caligata, 88.

—— capistrata, 84, 88.
—— euryncha, 85.
— gracilis, 86.

—— macronyx, 84, 85.
—— macroptera, 85.
—— magnirostris, 84.
—— modesta, 88.
— obsoleta, 87, 88.
pallida, 87.
palustris, 84.
-—— scita, 83, 88.
-—— scitopsis, 88.
sphenura, 86.

| Salicaria tamariceti, 88.

turcomana, 84.
turdoides, 83.
Sarkidiornis africana,
214.
Saxicola bifasciata, 201.
erythrea, 280.
cenanthe, 21, 215.
Schizoptila, 385.
Schizorhis concolor, 199.
Scheeniclus pallasi, 333.
pyrrhulinus, 333.
—— pyrrhuloides, 333.
yessoensis, 333.
Scolopax gallinago, 309,
330.

gallinula, 330.
hiemalis, 330.
—— major, 310.
rusticola, 27, 330.
solitaria, 330.
Scops giu, 382.
sunia, 343.
Scoteeus nycticorax, 325.
Seleucides alba, 244,
247, 251.
Sericornis minimus, 259.
Sericulus aureus, 244,
248, 270.
xanthogaster, 267.
Serinus hortulanus, 25.
Serpentarius secretarius,
194, 423.
Serpophaga subcristata,
159.

Sibia melanoleuca, 355.

—— picaoides, 354.

Sisopygis icterophrys,
159.

Sitta cinnamomeiventris,
346. ~
europea, 99.
formosa, 346.
himalayensis, 346.
neumeyeri, 1'76.
syriaca, 176.
Somateria dispar, 335.
Sparvius gilvicollis, 1, 2.
—— ruficollis, 1.
Spatula clypeata, 335,
420.

platalea, 163.

Sphenceacus africanus,
425.

Spilornis bacha, 32.

pallidus, 32.

Squatarola helvetica, 222,
327.

Stachyris nigriceps, 353.

Stercorarius crepidatus,
453.

Stercorarius parasiticus,
455.
Sterna albigena, 384.
anglica, 415.
bergii, 393.
cantiaca, 61.
caspia, 415.
fluviatilis, 415.

longipennis, 393.
lunata, 393.

—— melanauchen, 155,
393.
—— minuta, 165, 416.

panaya, 393.
superciliaris, 165.
—— trudeaui, 165.
Sternula placens, 363.
Stoliczkana stoliczke,
178:
Strepsilas collaris, 328.
interpres, 152, 328,
334, 393.
Strix aluco, 100, 101,
104.
—— delicatula, 144,
260, 391.
— dumeticola, 343.
elata, 14.
—— flammea, 104, 260.
stridula, 101, 102,
104.
Struthio camelus, 99.
Sturnella defilippii, 159.
Sturnus humii, 500.
nitens, 500.
vulgaris, 24, 99,
500.
Surnia hudsonia, 13.
nyctea, 111.
ulula, 13.
Sycobius cassini, 461.
cristatus, 459.
—— malimbus, 462.
—— melanotis, 465.
nigerrimus, 464.
nigrifrons, 459.
—— nitens, 463.
— nuchalis, 462.
racheliz, 464.
scutatus, 460.
Sylvia celata, 170.
cinerea, 79.
curruca, 79.
—— magnirostris, 79.
—— melanocephala, 20.
—— mystacea, 80.
nana, 80.
nisoria, 79.
—— orphea, 79.
peregrina, 171.

hirundo, 61, 99, 451.

INDEX.

Sylvia rama, 499.
rufa, 79.
ruficapilla, 170.
subalpina, 80.
Syrnium aluco, 63, 100.
cinereum, 13.
—— indranee, 342.
lapponicum, 13.
nivicolum, 342.
—— seloputo, 342.
woodfordi, 197.
Syrrhaptes paradoxus,

dal

Tachybaptus dominicus,
160.
Tachypetes aquilus, 393.
Tachytriorchis albicau-
datus, 67, 76.
Tadorna cornuta, 419.
—— rutila, 419.
Talegallus jobiensis, 254.
Tanagra malimbica, 456,
457, 459.
—— tatao, 99.
Tantalus ibis, 211.
loculator, 99.
Tanysiptera caroline,
245, 247, 258, 359, 363.
—— dea, 359.
ellioti, 246.
—— nympha, 247.
riedeli, 247, 258.
Tatare? viridis, 392, 506.
Tchitrea borbonica, 284.
cristata, 433.
cyanomelas, 433.
paradisi, 188.
viridis, 433.
Terekia cinerea, 64, 292.
Terpsephone viridis, 203.
Tetrao tetrix, 221, 322.
urogallus, 221, 322.
Tetraogallus caspius, 280,
322.

Tetrastes bonasia, 221.
Textor malimbus, 461.
Thalassidroma furcata,
335.
macgillivrayi, 393.
Thamnobia fulicata, 139.
Thinocorus rumicivorus,
164.
Tichodromamuraria, 176.
pheenicoptera, 176.
Tiga intermedia, 344.
—— shorii, 344.
Timelia guttata, 354.
leucotis, 354.
Tinnunculus japonicus,

521

Tinnunculus ruficollis,
428.

Todopsis grayi, 248.

Totanus ealidris, 412.

canescens, 213, 411.

—— fuscus, 292, 411.

—— glareola, 291, 334,
412

—— glottis, 291, 334,
411

—— hypoleucus, 411.
—— ochropus, 27, 213,
412.
stagnatilis, 412.
Trachycomus ochroce-
phalus, 38.
Trachyphonus caffer, 200.
Treron olax, 51.
Trichoglossus aureicinc-
tus, 138, 141, 391.
cyanogrammus, 263.
—— massenex, 263.
rosenbergi, 258.
Trichostoma abboti, 353.
—— celebense, 376.
finschi, 378, 379.
umbratile, 377.
Tringa albescens, 52.
alpina, 411.
——— canutus, 293.
—— damacensis, 334.
—— minuta, 294, 410.
subarquata, 298,
411.
—— temmincki, 308,
411.
variabilis, 411.
Tringoides hypoleucus,
52, 334.
Trochilus amethystina,

auriculatus, 396.
auritus, 395.
barroti, 397.
brevicauda, 398,
401.

chionogaster, 8.
colubris, 99.
—— cyanotis, 404.
exortis, 318.
francis, 316.
—— hypoleucus, 8.
—— leadhbeateri, 7.
leucogaster, 8.
—— mitchelli, 399.
—~— otero, 7.
prunelli, 58.
——— quadricolor, 312.
—— gerrirostris, 406.
—— thalassinus, 404.
—— turneri, 9.

522

Trochilus wilsoni, 5Y.
(Lampornis) insec-
tivorus, 5.
Troglodytes europzeus,
176.
—— furvus, 157.
nepalensis, 175.
—— parvulus, 19, 175.
tianshanicus, 176.

Turdinus brevicauda, 354.

brevicaudatus, 353.
crispifrons, 353.
—— guttatus, 353.
insidiosus, 353.

— macrodactylus, 353.

—— striatus, 354.

Turdus albicinctus, 353.

atrigularis, 353.
—— campbelli, 508.
chrysopleurus, 508.
dauma, 353.

—— gurneyi, 426.

_ —— iliacus, 23, 125.
-—— litsitsirupa, 201.
—— merula, 23, 381.
— mollissimus, 353.
—— musicus, 23, 381.
—— naumanni, 332.
—— olivaceus, 210, 426.
pelios, 508.

pilaris, 125.

—-— ruficollis, 353.

INDEX.

Turdus rufigularis, 353.
—— torquatus, 61.
viscivorus, 99.
Turnix maculosa, 508.
Turtur auritus, 26.
humilis, 334.
ianthina, 334.
intercedens, 321.
risorius, 62, 334.
rupicolus, 321.
semitorquatus, 208.

—— senegalensis, 62, 322.

—— stoliczkx, 322.
vulgaris, 321.

Upupa africana, 198.
epops, 19, 99, 319.
—— minor, 193.
Uragus sanguinolentus,

sibiricus, 333.

Urospizias radiatus, 65.

Urubitinga anthracina,
470, 487, 488.

gundlachi, 470, 487,
488.

—— plumbea, 470.

—-— gschistacea, 470.

zonura, 470, 487.

Vanellus cayennensis, 164.
—— cristatus, 328, 334.

END OF VOL. VI.

Vanellus gregarius, 382.
leucurus, 328.
vulgaris, 26, 328.
Vidua ardens, 207, 433.
paradisea, 207.
Volvocivora arvensis, 351.
fimbriata, 351.
Vultur occipitalis, 423.

Xantholema duvaucelii,
35.

hezemacephala, 345,
»indica, 128.
Xanthomelus aureus, 267.
Xerophila pectoralis, 259.
Xylolepes validus, 36.

Yunx torquilla, 26.

Zenaida maculata, 163.
Zonotrichia pileata, 158.
Zoothera marginata, 353.
Zosterops austeni, 351.
explorator, 140, 153,
392. :
—— flaviceps, 140, 158,
262, 392. 2
flavifrons, 140, 262.
palpebrosa, 350,
siamensis, 350.
—— virens, 202, 426.

PRINTED BY TAYLOR AND FRANCIS,

RED LION COURT, FLEET STREET,

GENERAL INDEX TO THE IBIS,

1871-1876.

An asterisk (*) prefixed to an author’s name or a reference indicates a work or
paper noticed in the “ Index to Ornithological Literature” published in the years

1871, 1872, and 1873.

*Abbott, C. C., 1872, 413.

Accipiter virgatus (see Gurney, J. H.).

Accipitres in the Paris Museum (see
Sharpe, R. B.); notes on Sharpe’s
Catalogu of (see Gurney, J. H.); on
certain spevies of (see Gurney, J. H.).

*Adams, Arthur, 1871, 418.

A&thopyga lodoisia (see Salvadori, T.).

Africa, ornithology of South (see Layard,
H. L., and Sharpe, R. B.); three
months on the coast of South (see
Shelley, G. E.); Western, expedition
to, 1872, 207. 4

African birds, new species of (see Sharpe,
R. B.); on two new species of South
(see Sharpe, R. B.) ; six new species of
West (see Shelley, G. E.); two new
species of South (see Sharpe, R. B.).

African and Indian,birds (see Blanford,

* Aiken, C. E., 1873, 480.

Albatrosses (see Sperling, R. M.).

Alcidz, Brandt's monograph of (see
Salvin, O.).

Algerian birds (see Gurney, J. H., jun.) ;
ornithology (see Gurney, J. H., jun.).

*Allen, J. A., 1871, 418; 1873, 481.

Allen, J. A.,‘Mammalsand Winter Birds
of Florida,’ notice of, 1872, 189.

*Alléon, A., and Vian, J., 1871, 418.

*Allis, T., 1873, 432.

Alston, H. R., and Brown, J. A. Harvie,
notes from Archangel, 1873, 54.

*Altum, Prof., 1873, 482.

American birds, Coues’s Key to, an-
nounced, 1872, 340; on five new spe-
cies of (see Lawrence, G. N.).

Anarhynchus frontalis, (see Brown, J. A.

_ Harvie).
SER. III.—VOLS. I.-VI.
y.

Andaman Islands, on birds of (see Wal-
den, Viscount).

* Anderson, A., 1872, 413; 1873, 433.

Anderson, Andrew, on Sterna leucoparia
breeding in India, 1872, 81; nidifi-
cation of certain Indian birds, Part L.,
1872, 237; Part I1., 1873, 74; Part
IT1., 1874, 220; Part IV., 1875, 199.;
letter on the habits of Eudynamis
honorata, 1875, 142.

*Anderson, John, 1872, 413.

Anderson, J.,.on a collection of Persian
birds, 1871, 371.

* Andersson, C. J. (see Gurney, J. H.).

Andersson’s ‘Birds of Damara Land’
reviewed, 1873, 91.

*Antinori, A. (see Salvadori, T.).

Aquila adalberti and allies (see Gurney,
J. H.); nzeyioides in Spain (see Gur-
ney, J. H.).

Aquile of S.H. Europe (see Gurney, J.
H.); the nostril of certain species of
(see Gurney, J. H.),

Ara macao in Mexico (see Reinhardt,

Archangel, notes from (see Alston, E. R..,
and Brown, J. A. Harvie).
Arctic Expedition, news of,
520.

Ardetta eurhythma (see Swinhoe, R.).

Arfak Mountains (see Meyer, A. B.).

Argentine Republic, Leybold’s excursion
into, 1873, 429; ornithology of (see
Lee, W. B.).

Argus ocellatus (see Elliot, D. G.).

*Arlt, Carl, 1872, 414.

Artamus leucorhynchus, letter on (see
Walden, Viscount).

Asia, birds of (see Gould, J.).

1875,

ll GENERAL INDEX.

Asiatic birds, on new species of (see
Severtzoff, N.).

Astur rufitorques (see Gurney, J. H.).

Athene noctua (see Gurney, J. H.).

*Austen, H. H. Godwin-, 1873, 433.

Australian parrots (see Halley, J. J.).

Ayres, T., on Natal ornithology, 1873,
280; on Transvaal ornithology, 1374,
101; birds of the Lydenburg district
of Transvaal, 1876, 422.

Azov, Sea of, notes on the birds of (see
Taylor, G. C.).

Baird, S. F., ‘Birds of North America,’
announcement of, 1872, 195.

*Baird, 8. F. (see Whitney).

*Bakody, Theodor, 1873, 433.

*Baldamus, E., 1871, 419.

*Ball, V., 1871, 419; 1872, 414; 1873,
434.

*Bannister, B. H., 1871, 419.

Barbadoes, birds of (see Salvin, O.).
Barbet, new species of (see Lloyd, J.

Hayes).

*Barkly, Sir H., 1871, 420.

Barratt, F. A., on birds of the Lyden-
burg district, 1876, 191.

*Beling, 1873, 434.

*Bello y Espinosa, 1872, 414.

*Bemmelen, A. A., 1873, 434.
*Beneden, P. J. van, 1873, 434.
*Bertaud, 1872, 414.

*Betant, A. H., 1872, 414.

Bessels, Dr., joins Captain Hall’s Arctic
Expedition, 1872, 90.

*Bettoni, E., 1871, 420; 1872, 415.

*Bianconi, G. G., 1873, 434.

*Bianconi, J. J., 1871, 421.

‘Bird life’ (see Labouchere, H. M., and
Jesse, W.).

Birds observed during a voyage from
Cape Town (see Layard, E. L.); ‘ of
Egypt’ (see Shelley, G. E.); of prey,
notes on Indian (see Delmé Radcliffe).

Blackwall’s ‘Researches in Zoology’
noticed, 1873, 430.

*Blanchard, Emil, 1872, 415.
-*Blanford, W. T., 1871, 421; 1872, 415;
1873, 435. : .
Blanford, W. T., on Drymececa adamsi

and the relationship of the Indian and
African faunas, 1872, 84; note on
Pellorneum subochraceum, 1872, 87;
expedition to Persia, 1872, 92; new
species of Persian birds, 1873, 86; notes
on ‘Stray Feathers,’ 1873, 211; new
Persian birds, 1873, 225; on Indian
and Persian birds, 1874, 75; letter on
Malabar birds, 1874, 92; letter on cer-
tain Sylviide and on the application of
the rules of nomenclature, 1874, 300 ;

letter on Hypocolius ampelinus in
Sind, 1875, 387. (See Dresser, H. EH.)

Blanford and St. John’s ‘Zoology of
Persia,’ announcement of, 1874, 174.

Blyth, E., letter on certain Indian birds,
1872, 87; on birds collected by Samuel
Griffith, 1872, 89; addenda to the
avifauna of India, 1873, 79; notice of
the death of, 1874, 465.

Blyth’s ‘ Catalogue of the Mammals and
Birds of Burma’ noticed, 1876, 270.

*Boardman, G. A., 1871, 422.

*Bocage, J. V. Barboza du, 1871, 422;
1872, 416; 1873, 486.

Boddaert’s ‘Table des Planches Enlu-

minées,’ reprint by W. B. Tegetmeier, -

noticed, 1873, 323.
Bonasa jobsi, note on (see Salvin, O.).
*Borggreve, B., 1872, 417. (See Droste,
F

Borneo, birds of Northern (see Walden,

Viscount) ; on the ornithology of (see i

Sharpe, R. B.).

Bourcier’s collection of Trochilidx, sale
of, 1874, 186.

*Brandt, A., 1873, 436.

*Brazier, J.. 1871, 422.

Brazilian ornithology (see Hamilton, J. |

Bree’s ‘Birds of Europe,’ announcement :
of new edition, 1874, 174; noticed, |

1875, 506.
*Brehm, A. E., 1872, 417; 1873, 486.
*Brehm, Reinhold, 1873, 436.

Brenchley’s ‘Cruise of the Curacgoa’ |

noticed, 1873, 322; 1874, 456.
*Brewer, T. M., 1871, 422; 1873, 487.

Brewer, T. M., note on Dendreeca cas- |

tanea, 1872, ddl. ;
*Brewster, W. (sce Maynard, C. J.).

Brockholes’s paper on the birds of Wir-

ral, noticed, 1874, 449.
Brooke, A. B., visit to Sardinia, 1872,
208 ; ornithology of Sardinia, 1873,

143; letter on Fuligula cristata breed- |

ing in Scotland, 1875, 514.
*Brooke, Sir Victor, 1872, 417.
*Brooks, W. E., 1872, 417; 1873, 487.

Brooks, W. E., on a new Phylloscopus, |

1872, 22; Reguloides superciliosus, R.

proregulus, R. occipitalis, and Phyllo- |
scopus tytleri breeding, 1872, 24; |

on Melizophilus striatus, 1872, 180;

letter on Indian birds, 1872, 469; on |

European and Asiatic Eagles, 1874,
84; letter on certain Sylviidx, 1874,
183; letter on certain species of In-

dian birds, 1874, 459; ornithological _

notes and corrections, 1876, 499.

Brown, J. A. Harvie, letter on eggs of |
New-Zealand birds, 1874, 96; letter |

GENERAL INDEX. lil

on Anarhynchus frontalis breeding,
1875, 519. (See Alston, H. R., and
Danford, C. G.)

*Bruce, H. J., 1873, 438.

*Bruhin, Th. A., 1871, 423; 1872, 418;
1373, 438.

Buceros sharpii (see Elliot, D. G.).

*Buckley, Henry, 1873, 439.

Buckley, T. E., on birds observed in the

_ Matabili country, 1874, 355; letter on
birds from Matabili, 1876, 182. (See
Shelley, G. EH.)

Buenos Ayres, ornithology of (see Durn-
ford, H1.).

*Buller, W., 1871, 423; 1872, 418;
1873, 439.

Buller, W. L., ‘Birds of New Zealand,’
announcement of, 1872, 194; on Hie-
racidea, 1872, 332; a new species of
Cormorant, 1273, 90; letter on New-
Zealand birds, 1874, 93 ; ornithology
of New Zealand, 1874, 112; ‘ Birds
of New Zealand’ reviewed, 1873, 92.

Burma, on birds from (see Walden,
Viscount).

*Burmeister, H., 1872, 419; 1873, 440.

*Cabanis, J., 1871, 423; 1872, 419;
1873, 440.

*Cabanis, J., Reichenow, A., and Helm,
M., 1871, 424. ;

Calandrella reboudia (see Lilford, Lord).

Calliste (see Sclater, P. L.).

Camaroptera, letter on(sceGurney,J.H.).

*Campana, 1871, 424.

‘Canadian Ornithologist, first number
of, noticed, 1873, 429.

Canaries, on birds of the (see Godman,
Hed):

Canterbury, New Zealand, additions to
the Museum of (see Potts, T. H.).

Capitonid, on certain species of (see
Marshall, C. H. T.).

Carduelis caniceps (see Dresser, H. E.).

*Carreaux, L. D., 1871, 425.

Celebes, letter on certain birds of (see
Salvadori, T.).

Ceylon, on the birds of the southern
hill-region of (see Legge, W. V.); the
birds of Southern (see Legge, W. V.).

Ceylon birds (see Swinhoe, R..).

Ceylonese birds, letter on (see Legge, W.
Y., and Holdsworth, EK. W. H.).

Chalcopelia bremeri, note on (see Hinsch,
Of}

Charadrius, on two species of (see Finsch,
O.); placidus (see Harting, J. H.).
Chatham Islands, birds of (see Hutton,

F. W.),

Cheefoo, ornithological notes made at

(see Swinhoe, R.).

China, birds seen on a voyage to (see
(Swinhoe, R.); ‘Fasciculus of the
Birds of’ (see Gray, G. R.); Pére
David’s travels in (see Sclater, P.
L).

Chinese birds, letter on (see Swinhoe,
R.); ornithology, notes on (see Swin-
hoe, R.).

Chlorochrysa (see Sclater, P. L.).

Circus (see Gurney, J. H.); distinctive
characters of (see Saunders, H.).

Circus macroscelus (see Gurney, J.
Hi.) ; wolfi (see Gurney, J. H.).

Colius, structure &c. of (see Murie, J.).

*Collett, Robert, 1872, p. 419; 1873,
441.

Colluricinela concinna (see Hutton, W.

Columbia, United States of, birds of (see
Wyatt, C. W.).

Condors (see Gurney, J. H.).

Constantinople, ornithological notes
from (see Sclater, P. L., and Taylor,
Hac).

*Oooper, J. G., 1871, 424; 1872, 420.
(See Whitney.)

Cooper, T. 'I’., note on Thaumalea am-
herstie, 1871, 3871.

Coraciide, African (see Sharpe, R. B.).

Cordeaux, J., notes on the birds of
Heligoland, 1875, 172; letter on
Heligoland birds, 1876, 128.

*Cornély, J. M., 1872, 420.

Corrigenda, 1874, 188.

Corsica, birds of (see Jesse, W.), on
the ornithology of (see Wharton, C.
B

Corvus, on a new species of, from Tan-
gier (see Irby, L. H.).

Coryllis (see Finsch, O.).

*Coues, Hlliott, 1871, 426; 1872, 420;
1873, 441. (See Hyatt, Alpheus.)
Coues, Elliot, on Picicorvus columbi-
anus, 1872, 52; history of Gymno-
citta cyanocephela, 1872, 152; letter
on the breeding of Gymnocitta cyano-

cephala &c., 1875, 270.

Coues’s ‘Key to North-American Birds’
noticed, 1874, 178°; ‘ Field Ornitho-
logy’ noticed, 1874, 458; ‘ Ornitho-
logy of the Prybiloy Islands’ noticed,
1874, 458; ‘Birds of the North-
West’ noticed, 1875, 494,

*Coulon, L,, 1871, 426.

*Oox, T., 1872, 421.

Crimea, birds of (see Taylor, G. C.).

*Ounningham, Robert, 1871, 426; 1872,

21.

Cuculus canorus at Natal (see Gurney,
dx EL)

Cutch, on birds of (see Lloyd, J. Hayes).

lv GENERAL INDEX.

Cyanocephalus wiedi, reference to (see
Salvin, O.).

Cyornis, on certain species of (see Lloyd,
J. Hayes, and Walden, Viscount.)

*Dall, W. H., 1871; 426.

Damaraland, birds of (see Gurney, J.
H.).

nae CO. G., expedition to Asia
Minor, 1876, 280.

*Darwin, Charles, 1871, 427; 1872,
421.

*Darwin, F. (see Garrod, A. H.).

*David, A., 1871,427; 1872,422; 13873,
443. (See Sclater, P. L.)

*Deoreaux, L., 1872, 422; 1873, 443.

*Dendreeca castanea (see Brewer, T. M.).

*De Selys Longchamps, 1871, 427.

*Desmeure, M., 1871, 427.

*Devic, Marcel, 1873, 444.

Deutsche Ornithologen - Gesellschaft,
1873, 429.

Didunculus strigirostris, its abundance
at Samoa, 1872, 208.
*Digeles, 8., 1871, 428.
Diglossine, on the

Sclater, P. L.). .

Dillon, J. F., Hlanus ceruleus in Ire-
land, 1872, 470.

*Dode, Charles, 1872, 422.

*Doderlein, Pietro, 1872, 422; 1873,
44+.

*Dohrn, H., 1872, 422.

Dolospingus nuchalis described (see El-
liot, D. G.).

*Dorner, H., 1873, 444.

*Drachenfels, C., 1871, 428.

Drake, C. F. Tyrwhitt, notice of the
death of, 1874, 469.

Drepanornis albertisi, note on its dis-

~ covery (see Sclater, P. L.).

*Dresser, H. H., 1872, 423; 1873, 444
(see Sharpe, R. B.).

Dresser, H. E., on a new Marsh-
Warbler, 1874, 420; letter on
Carduelis caniceps, 1875, 387 ; letter
on Sylvia rama, 1375, 513; letter
on ‘Sylvan,’ 1875, 515; Severtzoff’s
‘Fauna of Turkestan,’ 13875, 96,
236, 382; 1876, 77, 171, 319, 410.

Dresser, H. H., and Blanford, W. T.,
on Hemprich and Ehrenberg’s types,
1874, 335.

*Dresser, H. E., and Sharpe, R. B.,
1871, 428,

Dresser’s ‘ Birds of Europe,’ notice of
its progress, 1874, 173; noticed, 1874,
450,

subfamily (see

* Droste, F., 1873, 445.

*Droste, F., and Borggreve, B., 1873,
445,

Drymeca adamsi (see Blanford, W.
it

Dryotriorchis, note on (see Shelley, G.
E

*Dubois, Alph., 1872, 423.

Dubois, A., ‘Catalogue of the Birds of
Europe,’ notice of, 1872, 187.

*Dugeés, A., 1871, 428.

Durnford, H., on North-Frisian orni-
thology, 1374, 891; ornithology of
Buenos Ayres, 1876, 157.

; *Dybowski, Dr., 1872, 428.

Kagles, on European and Asiatic (see
Brooks, W. E.).
Ecuador, on new birds from (see Sal-

vin, O.).
*Hdwards, Alph. Milne, 1872, 423.
Egypt, ornithology of (see Shelley,
G. EH.) ;. Raptores of (see Gurney, J.
H

*Hhlers, Prof., 1873, 445.

Elanus ceruleus (see Dillon, J. F.).

*EHlliot, D. G., 1871, 428; 1872, 424;
1873, 445.

Elliot, D. G., on new species of Eury-
stomus, 1871, 203; description of a
new genus and species of Finch, -
1871, 402; on Nyctale kirtlandi,
1372, 48 ; new genera of Paradiseide,
1872, 111; ‘Monograph of the Phasi-
anidee, announcement of, 1872, 194;
on a new Hriocnemis, 1872, 293;
Humming-birds of the West Indies,
1872, 345; a new species of Horn-
bill, 1873, 177; letter on Argus ocel-
latus, 1373, 530; on a new species
of Hucephala, 1874, 87; on some
typical specimens of the Trochilide,
1874, 261; notes on Trochilide, the
genus Helianthea, 1874, 330; notes
on the Trochilide, the genera Chloro-
stilbon and Panychlora, 1875, 149;
on some type specimens of Trochi-
lide, 1876, 5; notes on Trochilide,
the genus Lampropygia, 1876, 54;
letter on Central-Asiatic Pheasants,
1876, 131; notes on the Trochilid,
the genera Cyanomyia and Heliotry-
pha, 1876, 311; notes on the Trochi-
lidxe, the genera Heliothrix, Calli-
phlox, Catharma, and Petasophora,
1876, 394; on the genus Malimbus,
1376, 406. (See Salvin, O.)

Hlliot’s ‘Phasianide’ reviewed, 1873,
93; ‘Paradiseide’ reviewed, 1873, 94.

Elwes, H. J., on the genus Henicurus,
1872, 250.

GENERAL INDEX. v

Emberiza huttoni in China (see Holds-
worth, E. W. H.).

Ephialtes jerdoni (see Walden),

Hriocnemis, on a new species of (see
Elliot, D. G.).

*Hrnst, A., 1871, 4380.

Erythrousterna parva (see Walden, Vis-
count).

Bucephala, on a new species of (see Hl-
lot, D. G.).

Eudynamis taitiensis, the egg of (see
Potts, LT. H.); honorata, letter on the
habits of (see Anderson, Andrew).

‘Burope, Birds of’ (see Sharpe, R. B.,
and Dresser, H. H., also Dresser, H.
E.); ‘Catalogue of the Birds of’ (see
Dubois, A.).

Hurylemus, its position (see Sclater, P.
L

Eurystomus, on a new species of (see
Elliot, D. G.).

Eversmann’s ‘Addenda,’ reprint of, no-
ticed, 1875, 521.

Exton, H., on the habits of Schizorhis
concolor, 1871, 107.

Fantee-country birds (see Sharpe, R.
B., and Ussher, H. M.).

*Fatio, V.,1871, 401.

‘Fauna d'Italia’ (see Salvadori, T.).

*Feilden, H. W., 1373, 446.

*Fickert, C., 1871, 431.

Fiji Islands (see Layard, E. L.).

Fijian birds, distribution of (see Layard,
Hb)

*FHinsch, O.,
1873, 447.

Finsch, O., on two species of Chara-
drius, 1872, 144; on a new species of
Coryllis, 1874, 206; on two New-
Zealand Penguins, 1875, 112; note
on Chalcopelia brehmeri, 1875, 467.
(See Sclater, P. L.)

*Finsch, O., and Hartiaub, G., 1871,
433 ;. 1873, 448.

*Fischer, J., 1871, 484; 1873, 448.

Flight of birds (see Hutton, W. F.).

Florida, mammals and winter-birds of
(see Allen, J. A.).

*Flower, W. H., 1872, 426.

*Fraas, O., 1871, 434.

Francolin, extinction of, in Sicily (see
Saunders, H.).

*Fraser, T., 1873, 449.

*Frauenfeld, G. R., 1871, 484; 1872,
426; 1873, 449.

*Freyberg, Baron von, 1873, 449.

Frisian ornithology (see Durnford, H.).

*Fritsch, A., 1872, 427; 1873, 449.

Fulica alba, note on (see Salvin, O.).

Fuligula cristata (see Brooke, A. B.).

1871, 431; 1872, 426;

*Garrod, A. H., 1873, 449.

Garrod, A. H., on some cranial pecu-
liarities of the Woodpecker, 1872,
307,

*Garrod, A. H., and Darwin, F., 1373,
450.

Gecinus erythropygius (sce Walden,
Viscount).

*Gegenbaur, O., 1872, 427.

*Geoffroy St.-Hilaire, A., 1871, 485.

Geothlypis, on the genus (see Salvin,
O

Gerygone, New-Zealand species of (see
Potts, "D..Hs).

*Giebel, C. G., 1873, 450.

Giebel’s ‘Ornithologischer Thesaurus,’
announcement of, 1871, 251; notice
of, 1872, 191.

*Gighoh, E. H., 1872, 427.

*Gigholi, H. H., and Salvadori, T.,
1871, 435.

*Gillett, G., 1871, 435.

*Guillies, T. B., 1872, 428.

*Girtanner, A., 1871, 436 ; 1873, 451.

*Glaser, L., 1873, 452.

Glaucidium (see Ridgway, R., also
Sharpe, R. B.).

*Gobel, H., 1871, 436; 1872, 428;
1873, 452.
*Godman, F. D., 1871, 486.

Godman, F. D., visit to the Canary
Islands, 1871, 252; on the birds of
Madeira and the Canaries, 1872,
153209:

*Godwin-Austen, H. H., 1871, 487;
1873, 452.

Godwin-Austen, H. H., and Walden,
Viscount, on supposed new species of
birds, 1875, 250.

Gold-Coast, birds of (see Shelley, G. E.,
and Buckley, T. E.); ornithology of
(see Ussher, H. T.).

*Goodhue, D., 1872, 428.

*Gould, J., 1871, 487; 1872, 428; 1873,
453.

Gould’s ‘ Birds of Asia’ noticed, 1872,
188, 1874, 452; ‘Birds of Great Bri-
tain, notice of the completion of,
1874, 172;. ‘Introduction to the
Birds of Great Britain’ noticed, 1874,
450.

Graculus lucidus (see Gurney, J. H.).

*Graffe, H., 1871, 439.

*Grandidier, A., 1871, 439.

*Gray, G. R., 1871, 439; 1872, 429.

Gray, G. R., ‘Fasciculus of the Birds
of China,’ notice of, 1872, 188; the
death of, 1875, 340.

get J. H., notice of the death of, 1875,

Gray, R., ‘Birds of the West of Scot-

Vi GENERAL INDEX.

land,’ notice of, 1872, 184; on Grus
pavonina in Scotland, 1872, 201;
Syrrhaptes paradoxus in Ayrshire,
1372, 335; Sea-Gulls in the Firth
of Forth, 1873, 332.

*Grayson, A. J., 1872, 480;
454.

*Grey, Sir G., 1871, 440.

Griffith, Samuel, on birds collected by
(see Blyth, E.).

Grus pavonina
201.

Guatemalan birds (see Salvin, O.).

Guiana, Spanish, on birds of (see Pel-
zeln, A.).

*Gulliver, G., 1873, 454.

Gulls (see Gray, R.).

*Gundlach, J., 1872, 481 ; 1873, 455.

*Ginther, A., 1873, 455.

*Gurney, Ji) H121872,) 4S 1/5 Ur8493)
455.

Gurney, J. H., letter respecting Cucu-
lus canorus in Natal, 1871, 108;
birds of the Transvaal, 1871, 147,
252; letter on Egyptian Raptores,
1871, 247; on Aquila nevioides in
Spain, 1371, 247; on Athene noctua
from Poona and Otus brachyotus
from the Sandwich Islands, 1872,
83; Andersson’s ‘Birds of Damara-
land, announcement of, 1872, 194;
miscellaneous notes on certain Acci-
pitres and Striges, Oreocinela hancii,
ostrich-farming, and Somateria stel-
leri, 1872, 327; on the nostrils
of certain Aquilew, 1872, 472; on
Aquila adalberti and its allies, 1873,
98; Graculus lucidus in Damaraland,
1873, 232; tenth list of birds from
Natal, 1873, 254; on Vultur auricu-
laris laying in confinement, 1873,
324; letter respecting Circus wolfi,
1873, 421; letter on Aquile of S.H.
Europe, 1873, 422; letter on Cama-
roptera from Damaraland, 1874, 94;
on the Spilornis of Ceylon, 1874, 181;
letter on Herodias intermedia, 1874,
463; letter on Condors, 1875, 269;
letter on the breeding of the Snowy
Owl, 1875, 517; Notes on Sharpe’s
‘Catalogue of Accipitres,’ 1875, 87,
221, 353, 468; 1876, 65, 230, 364,
467; letter on some species of Cir-
cus, 1876, 129; letter on Accipiter
virgatus and Circus macroscelus,1876,
278; letter on Astur rufitorques &c.,
1876, 384. (See Ayres, T.)

*Gurney, J. H., jun., 1872, 431.

Gurney, J. H., jun., on Algerian orni-
thology, 1871, 68, 289; letter on
Algerian birds, 1875, 140; letter on

1873;

in Scotland, 1872,

a Swallow shot in Durham, 1875,
519.

Gymnocitta cyanocephala, history of (see
Coues, E

Gypaetus, red colouring of (see Steven-
son, H.).

*Haast, J., 1871, 441; 1872, 432.

Haast, J., on the extinct birds of New
Zealand, 1874, 209.

Hakodadi, birds of (see Swinhoe, R.).

Halley, J. J., ‘Australian Parrots,’ no-
tice of, 1872, 188.

Hamilton, J. F., Brazilian ornithology,
1871, 301.

*Hanf, P. B., 1872, 483; 1873, 456.

*Hansman, A., 1873, 456.

*Harting, J. E., 1872, 433; 1873, 456.

Harting, J. E., ‘Ornithology of Shake-
speare,’ notice of, 1872, 185; ‘ Hints
on Shore-shooting,’ notice of, 1872,
185; ‘ Handbook of British Birds’
noticed, 1873, 94; rare or little-
known Limicole, 1873, 260, 1874,
241; letter on Charadrius placidus,
1873, 324; ‘Our Summer Migrants’
noticed, 1875, 503.

*Hartlaub, G., 1871, 441; 1872, 434;
1873, 456.

Hartlaub, G., on a new species of Pytelia,
1874, 166.

*Hartlaub, G., and Finsch, O., 1871,
442; 1872, 484; 1873, 457.

Hawker, W. H., notice of the death of,
1874, 464.

*Heck, R., 1871, 442.

*Hector, James, 1872, 435.

Helianthea (see Elliot, D. G.).

Heligoland, notes on the birds of (see
Cordeaux, J.).

*Helm, M. (see Cabanis, J.).

Helminthophaga (see Ridgway, R.).

Hemprich and Khrenberg’s types (see
Dresser, H. H., and Blanford, W. T.).

Henderson and Hume’s ‘Lahore -to
Yarkand’ noticed, 1873, 321.

Henicurus, revision of the genus (sce
Elwes, H. J.).

Herodias intermedia (see
JE)

*Heuglin, Th. von, 1871, 442; 1872, 485;
1873, 457.

Heuglin, Th. von, on the birds of Novaja
Zemlia and Waigats Island, 1872,
60.

Hieracidea (see Buller, W. L., Hutton,
F. W., and Sharpe, R. B.).

*Hill, H. S., 1871, 443.

*Hocker, J., 1871, 443; 1873, 459.

*Holden, C. H., 1873, 459.

*Holdsworth, E. W. H., 1873, 459.

Gurney,

GENERAL INDEX. vil

Holdsworth, E. W.H., Emberiza huttoni
in China, 1872, 473; on Ceylonese
birds, 1874, 122.

*Holker, C., 1871, 478.

*Holtz, L., 1871, 443; 1873, 459.

*Homeyer, A., 1871, 444.

*Homeyer, H. F., 1871, 444; 1872, 436;
1873, 460.

Homochlamysluscinia(see Salvadori, T.).

Horne, C., on the breeding of Mycteria
australis, 1871, 110.

*Hudson, W. H., 1871, 444; 1872, 437;
1873, 460.

Hiigel, A., letter on Australian and New-
Zealand birds, 1875, 389.

*Hume, A., 1871, 444.1873, 461.

Hume, A., notes on Indian ornithology,
1871, 23, 403; on six new Indian
birds, 1872, 107; letter on Scinde
birds, 1872, 468.

Hume’s ‘Nests and Eggs of Indian
Birds’ noticed, 1374, 452; 2nd no-
tice, 1875, 265; 3rd notice, 1875, 511.

Humming-birds of the West Indies (see
Elliot, D. G.).

*Hutton, F. W., 1871, 446; 1872, 438;
1873, 463.

Hutton, F. W., on New-Zealand Pro-
cellariide, 1872, 83; on the flight of
birds, 1872, 189; on Colluricincla
concinna, 1872, 201; birds of the
Chatham Islands collected by H. H.
Travers, 1872, 243; letter on Hiera-
cidea, 1873, 100; on Rallus modes-
tus, 1873, 849; on Tribonyx mortieri
from New Zealand, 1873, 427; notes
on certain New-Zealand birds, 1874,

*Hyatt, Alpheus, 1873, 463.
Hypocolius ampelinus (see Blanford, W.
T

Hypsipetes ganeesa (see Lloyd, J. Hayes).

Ibis nippon (see Swinhoe, R.).

*Im Thurn, E., 1871, 447.

India, addenda to the avifauna of (see
Blyth, E.); on birds of the N.W. pro-
vinees of (see Marshall, G. F. L.).

Indian birds, letter on (see Brooks, W.
E.); letter respecting certain species
of (see Blyth, H.); new species of (see
Hume, A. O.); on the nidification of
(see Anderson, Andrew, Jerdon, T. C.,
and Morgan, R. W.).

Indian and African birds (see Blanford,
W. T.).

Indian and Persian birds (see Blanford,

Indian ornithology, notes on (see Hume,
A.O.) ; Tickell’s ‘Illustrations’ of (see
Walden, Viscount).

Irby, L. H., letter on birds of Southern
Spain, 1872, 199; additions to the
birds of Southern Spain, 1873, 96;
on a new Corvus from Tangier, 1874,
264.

Irby’s ‘Ornithology of the Straits of
Gibraltar’ noticed, 1875, 501.

Japanese birds (see Swinhoe, R.).

Jardine, Sir W., notice of the death of,
1875, 522.

*Jaycox, T. W., 1872, 439.

Jelski, C., collections in Central Peru
(see Sclater, P. L.).

*Jerdon, T..C., 1871, 447.

Jerdon, T. C., supplementary notes to
the ‘ Birds of India,’ 1871, 234, 335,
1872, 1, 114, 297; the death of, 1872,
342.

Jesse, W., letter on additions to the birds
of Corsica, 1876, 380. (See Labouchere,
H. M.

*Jobert, M., 1871, 448; 1873, 464.

Juan Fernandez and Masafuera, birds
of (see Reed, BH. C., and Salvin, O.).

Karen-nee, notes from (see Ramsay, R.
W.»).

Kattiawar birds, corrections to list of
(see Lloyd, J. Hayes).

Kaup, J. J., notice of the death of, 1874,
471.

Kennedy, A. W. M. Clark, on the avi-
fauna of the desert of Sinai, 1874,
107.

Ketupa, on a new species of (see Swin-
hoe, R.).

Kidder and Coues’s ‘ Contributions to
the Natural History of Kerguelen’s
Island’ noticed, 1876, 274.

*Koch, G., 1871, 448; 1872, 489; 1873,
464. .

*Konig-Warthausen, B., 1871, 448.

*Kossman, R., 1372, 439.

*Krieger, O., 1871, 448; 1872, 439.

*Kriper, Th., 1873, 465.

*Kuwert, A., 1871, 448.

*Labouchere, H. M., and Jesse, W., 1873,
465.

Labouchere, H. M., and Jesse, W., ‘ Bird
Life,’ notice of, 1872, 193.

Lagopus (see Newton, A.).

*Landbeck, L. (see Philippi, R. A.).

*Landois, H., 1873, 465.

*Lanen, 1872, 440.

Larus leucophzeus, note on (see Sclater,
P. L.); melanocephalus in England
(see Saunders, H.).

bend aaes G. N., 1872, 440; 1873,

69.

RAEN, RR,

—,

8G aenene 3
2 Ome a

[oper et pater
NE SS a

i ptt;

k
2
Al,
gi
qi
sae
+
f

r —— roe P
a a eo i ed ect

*- -~ _— *
aw ee ee

Vill GENERAL INDEX.

Lawrence, G. N., letter on Central-Ame-
rican Psittacide, 1871, 249; note on
Porzana guatemalensis, 1871,370; on
Neomorphus pucherani and its allies,
1873, 287; on five new American
birds, 1875, 383; note on Muscipeta
incanescens, 1876, 497.

Layard, E. L., on birds observed during
a voyage from Cape Town, and on
some new South-African birds, 1871,
103; South-African ornithology, 1871,
225; residence at Para, 1872, 208;
on birds seen during a voyage to Para,
1872, 336; on the absence of birds in
the South Atlantic, 1873, 331; birds of
Para, 1873, 374; on anew Flycatcher
(Myiagra) &c., 1875, 434; on little-
known birds of the Fiji Islands, 1876,
137; on the ornithology of Fiji, 1876,
152; news of, 1876, 386; on the dis-
tribution of Fijian birds &c., 1876,
387 ; on a new species of Myiolestes,
1876, 498; letter on Samoan birds,
1376, 504.

Layard, E. L., and Sharpe, R. B., ‘ Or-
nithology of South Africa,’ announce-
ment of a second edition of, 1872,
193, 1873, 323; noticed, 1875, 505,
1876, 272.

*Lee, R. L., 1873, 466.

Lee, W. B., ornithology of the Argentine
Republic, 1873, 129.

*Legge, W. V., 1871, 449; 1872, 441.

Legge, W. V., on the birds of the south-
ern hill-region of Ceylon, 1874, 7;
on the birds of Southern Ceylon,
1875, 273, 395; letter on Ceylonese
birds, 1376, 126.

*Lenglier, C., 1872, 441.

*Le Prestre, F., 1871, 449.

Leucopternis, revision of (see Salvin, O.).

Leverian birds in the Vienna Museum
(see Pelzeln, A.); letter on (see Pel-
zeln, A.).

*Lewis, Grace, 1872, 442.

*Liebe, K. Th., 1873, 466.

*Lilford, Lord, 1871, 449.

Lilford, Lord, letter on Calandrella
reboudia and Numenius hudsonicus
in Spain, 1873, 98; cruise of the
‘Zara’ in the Mediterranean, 1875, 1.

Limicole from Shanghai (see Swinhoe,
R.); rare or little-known (see Hart-
ing, J. E.).

Linnzan genera, the types of (see New-
ton, Alfred).

Little Grebe, correct name of (see
Sclater, P. L.).

Lloyd, J. Hayes, on certain species of
Cyornis, 1872, 197; on Hypsipetes
ganeesa, 1872, 202; a new Barbet

from Western India, 1873, 124; the
birds of Kattiawar, 1873, 397; cor-
rections to list of Kattiawar birds,
1874, 97; letter on some birds from
the Run of Cutch, 1876, 280.

*Loewis-Kudling, O., 1873, 466.

Lophornis (see Salvin, O., and Elliot,
D. G.).

Loriculus, new species of (see Sclater,
Pai.

*Lihder, W., 1873, 466.

Lydenburg district, birds of (see Ayres,
T., and Barratt, F. A.).

Maack, G. A., expedition to the Isth-
mus of Panama, 1872, 339.

*M‘Master, A. C., 1872, 442.

Madeira and Canaries, on the birds of
(see Godman, F. D.).

*Magnus, H., 1871, 449; 1872, 442.

*Mair, W. G., 1873, 467.

*Mairet, A., 1872, 442.

Malabar birds, letter on (see. Blanford
Weak

Malimbus, on the genus’ (see Hlliot, D. °
Cee

*Malkin, F. W., 1871, 449.

*Malmeren, A. J., 1871, 449.

Malta and Gozo, on the birds of (see
Wright, C. A.).

Mansel-Pleydell’s ‘ Ornithology of Dor-
setshire’ noticed, 1874, 447.

*Mantell, W. B. D., 1873, 467.

*Marchand, A., 1871, 450; 1873, 467.

*Marchand, L., 1872, 442.

*Marey, E. J., 1871, 450; 1873, 467.

*Marsh, O. C., 1871, 450; 1873, 467.

*Marshall, C. H. T. and G. F. L., 1871,
451; 1872, 443.

Marshall, C. H. T. and G. F. L., on cer-
tain Capitonide, 1872, 327.

Marshall, G. F. L., on birds from the
N.W. Provinces of India, 1872, 203.

*Marshall, W., 1871, 452; 1872, 442,
1873, 468.

*Martens, E., 1873, 468.

*Martin, L., 1871, 452.

*Martin, P. L., 1871, 452; 1873, 469.

Mascarene Islands, Psittaci of (see New-
ton, A. and E.).

Matabili country, on birds of (see
Buckley, T. E.).

*Maynard, CO. J., 1873, 469.

Maynard’s ‘Birds of Florida’ noticed,
1873, 323.

Mediterranean, cruise of the ‘ Zara’ in
the (see Lilford, Lord).

Melizophilus striatus, description of (see
Brooks, W. E.).

Melliss, J. C., on the introduced birds
of St. Helena, 1871, 367.

GENERAL INDEX. 1x

Menado (sce Meyer, A. B.).

*Meyer, A. B., 1872, 443.

Meyer, A. B., announcement of his
arrival at Menado, 1871, 252; let-
ter on the date of the description
of Epimachus wilhelmineg, 1874, 303;
letter on New-Guinea birds, 1875,
147; letter on his visit to the Arfak
Mountains, 1876, 383, (See Sclater,
PG

_ *Meyer, R., 1873, 469.

Micrastur (see Ridgway, R.).

*Milne-Edwards, A., 1871, 453; 1873,
469.

*Mivart, St. G., 1872, 443.

*Mobius, K., 31871, 453; 1872, 444;
1873, 470.

*Modersohn, C., 1871, 453.

*Moose, E.8., 1873, 470. ~

Morgan, R. W., on the nidification of
South-Indian birds, 1875, 313.

Mormon grabs, letter on (see Olphe-
Galliard, L.).

*Morrell, G. H., 1871, 454.

*Morton, J., 1873, 470.

Motmots and their affinities (see Murie,

J.).

*Miuller, Pf. K., 1871, 454.

Mulsant’s ‘Histoire Naturelle des Oi-
seaux-Mouches’ noticed, 1874, 453 ;
1875, 265, 510. :

*Murie, J., 1871, 454; 1872, 444;
1873, 470.

Murie, J.,on the genus Colius, 1872,
262; Motmots and their affinities,
1872, 383; notes on Steatornis cari-
pensis, 1873, 81; relationships of the
Upupide, 1873, 181.

*Murison, W. D., 1872, 444,

Muscipeta incanescens (see Lawrence, G.

i)
*Muth, J. P., 1871, 454.
Mycteria australis, breeding (sce Horne,

Myiagra, new species of (see Layard, H.
L

Myiolestes, on a new species of (see
Layard, E. L.).

Natal, tenth list of birds from (see
Gurney, J. H.); ornithology of (sce
Ayres, T.).

*Nathusius, W., 1871, 454; 1872, 445;
1873, 471.

N fo an pucherani (sce Lawrence,

Negros Island, on the birds of (see Wal-
den, Viscount),

Nérée Quépart, two works by, noticed,
1875, 265.

Newcome, E.C., obituary, 1872, 91.

SER. III.—VOLS. I.—VI.

New Guinea (see Salvadori, T., and
Sclater, P. L.); Dr. Meyer’s dis-
coveries in (see Sclater, P. L.); birds
of (see Meyer, A. B.); explorations
in, 1874, 177.

New Hebrides, birds of (see Tristram,
Eeb:).

New Zealand, birds of (sce Buller, W.
L.); Buller’s ‘Birds of,’ noticed,
1872, 338; eggs of (seé Brown, J. A.
Harvie); notes on certain birds of
(see Hutton, F. W.); ornithology of
(see Buller, W. L.); on the extinct
birds of (see Haast, J.).

*Newton, A., 1871, 455; 1872, 445,
1873, 471.

Newton, Alfred, letter on the Spitsbergen
Lagopus, 1871, 249; on a new Parrot
from Rodriguez, 1872, 31; Yarrell’s
‘ British Birds,’ fourth edition, notice
of, 1872, 184, 1874, 173; letter on ad-
ditions to the birds of Spitsbergen,
1875, 272; note on Palzornis exsul,
1875, 342; on the types of Linnxan
genera, 1876, 94.

Newton, Alfred and Edward, on the
Psittaci of the Mascarene Islands,
1876, 281.

Newton, H. (see Newton, A.).

Nicaragua, additions to the list of birds
of (see Sclater, P. L.); birds of (see
Salvin, O.).

*Nicholson, H. A., 1872, 446.

*Niessing, C., 1871, 456. |

Ningpo (sce Swinhoe, R.).

*Ninni, A. P., 1872, 447.

‘Nomenclator Avium Americanarum,’
by Sclater and Salvin, noticed, 1874,
179.

Nomenclature, rules of (see Blanford,
W. T.; also Salvin, O.).

*Nordvi, A. G., 1872, 447.

Norfolk, birds of (see Stevenson, H.).

North America, birds of (see Baird, S.
Hi).

*Noulet, J. B., 1871, 456.

Novaja Zemlia and Waigats Island,
on the birds of (see Heuglin, Th.
von).

Numenius hudsonicus (see Lilford,
Lord).

Nyctale kirtlandi (see Elliot, D. G.).

Odontophorinse (see Salvin, O.).

*Oellacher, J., 1873, 472.

*Ogden, J. A. 1872, 447; 1873,
472.

Olphe-Galliard, L., letter on Mormon

grabee &ec., 1375, 267.

Orde, J. W. P., Quail breeding in N.
Uist, 1871, 112.
b

x GENERAL INDEX.

Oreocincla hancii, note on (see Gurney,
J. H.). ‘

Ornithological literature of 1870 and
1871 (see Salvin,O., and Sclater, P.L.).

Ornithological literature of 1872 (see
Sclater, P. L.,-and Finsch, O.).

‘Ornithologischer Thesaurus, notice of
(see Giebel).

*Orton, James, 1871, 456; 1872, 447.

Ostrich-farming (see Gurney, J. H.).

*Otto, H., 1873, 472.

Otus brachyotus from the Sandwich
Islands (see Gurney, J. H.).

*Owen, R., 1872, 447 ; 1873, 472.

Palzornis exsul, description of (see New-
ton, Alfred); melanorhynchus (see
Walden, Viscount).

Panama, expedition to the Isthmus of
(seé Maack, G. A.).

Para, birds seen during a voyage to
(see Layard, EH. L.); the birds of (sce
Layard, H. L.).

Paradiseide, new genera of (see Elliot,
D. G.).

*Parker, W. K., 1871, 456.

Passeres, on the arrangement of (see
Wallace, A. R.); paleearctic (see Tris-
tram, H.B.).

Pellorneum subochraceum (see Blan-
ford, W. 'T.).

Peltops, its position (sce Sclater, P. L.).

*Pelzeln, A., 1871, 457; 1872, 449;

1873, 473.
Pelzeln, A., Leverian birds in the
Vienna Museum, 1873, 14, 105;

letter on Leverian birds, 1874, 461;
on birds from Spanish Guiana, 1375,
329.

Penguin, on two New-Zealand species
of (see Finsch, O.).

Periodicals of 1872 containing ornitho-
logical papers (see Waterhouse, F’, H.).

Persian birds (see Anderson, J., and
Blanford, W. T.); new species of (see
Blanford, W. T.).

*Pettigrew, J. B., 1872, 449.

Phalacrocorax featherstoni described (see
Buller, W. L.).

Phasianide, monograph of (see Elliot,
D.G.).

Pheasants from Central Asia (see Elliot,
D. G.).

*Philipey Rk, A., and Landbeck, L., 1871,
458.

Phylloscopi, their synonymy (see Tris-
tram, H. B.).

Phylloscopus tytleri, description of (see
Brooks, W. E.).

Picicorvus columbianus
Elliott).

(see Coues,

*Pike, N., 1871, 458.

Pitta berte (see Salvadori, T.).

Platystira, the genus (see Sharpe, R. B.).

Polihierax fieldeni (see Walden, Vis-
count).

Porzana exquisita, letter on (see Swinhoe,
R.); guatemalensis, note on (see Law-
rence, G. N.).

*Potts, T. H., 1871, 458; 1872, 449;
1873, 473.

Potts, T. H., additions to the Museum,
Canterbury, New Zealand, 1872, 35;
the egg of Kudynamis taitiensis, 1872,
325; ona New-Zealand Gerygone, 1872,
325; a new species of Prion, 1873, 85.

_*Pouchet, A., 1871, 459.

*Preen, C., 1873, 474.

Prinia albogularis (see Walden, Viscount).

Prion, a new species of (see Potts, T. H.).

Prionochili of British India (see Sclater,
P15}

Prjevalski’s travels in China noticed,
1874, 174.

Procellariidz, on certain New-Zealand
species of (see Hutton, W. F.).

*Przewalski, 1873, 474.

Psittacide of Central America (see Sal-
vin, O., and Lawrence, G. N.).

Psittacus erithacus, note on (see Sclater,

-Pteroptochide (see Sclater, P. L..).

Ptilopterorum Conspectus Systematicus
(see Salvin, O.).

*Purdie, A. C., 1872, p. 450.

Pyranga roseogularis (see Sclater, P. L.).

Pyrrhula, letter on some Asiatic species
of (see Swinhoe, R.).

Pytelia, on a new species of (see Hart-
laub, G.).

Quail (see Orde, J. W. P.).
*Quistorp, Dr., 1871, 459. .

Radcliffe, E. Delmé, notes on Indian birds
of prey, 1871, 363.

Rallus modestus (see Hutton, F. W.).

Ramsay, E. P., note on Rhipidura rufi-
frons, 1875, 377; letter on Strix can-
dida, 1375, 512.

Ramsay, R.W., ornithological notes from
Karen-nee, 1875, 348.

“Recent Ornithological Publications,” an-
nouncement respecting (see Salvin, O.)

Reed, E. C., birds of Taba Fernandez
and Mas-a-fuera, 1874, 81.

' Reguloides superciliosus, R. proregulus,

R. occipitalis, and Phylloscopus tytleri
breeding (see Brooks, W. E.).
*Reichenow, A., 1871, 499; 1872, 450;
1873, 474.
*Reinhardt, J., 1871, 409; 1872, 450;
173, 479,

GENERAL INDEX. Xi

Reinhardt, J.,on Ara macao in Mexico,
1871, 362.

*Rey, H., 1872, 451; 1873, 475.

Rhea americana (see Sperling, R. M.).

Rhipidura rufifrons (see Ramsay, H. P.

Rhodostethia rosea (see Saunders, H.).

Rhynochetus, on the spelling of (sce Scla-
ter, P. L.).

*Ridgway, R., 1871, 460; 1873, 476.

Ridgway, R., on the genus Micrastur,
1876, 1; on the genus Glaucidium,
1876, 11; notes on the genus Helmin-
thophaga, 1876, 166.

Ridgway’s ‘ Studies of the Falconide ’
noticed, 1875, 498; “Monograph of
Leucosticte’ noticed, 1875, 501.

*Riedel, T. G. F., 1873, 476.

*Riva fu Rodolfo, A., 1873, 476.

*Riviére, C., 1871, 461.

*Rodd, H. H., 1873, 477.

*Rolleston, G., 1871, 461.

*Ross, A. M., 1872, 451; 1873, 477.

*Rowley, D. G., 1871, 461 ; 1873, 477.

Rowley’s ‘Ornithological Miscellany’
noticed, 1875, 261; ditto, No. 2, no-
ticed, 1875, 509.

*Russ, K., 1871, 461; 1873, 477. |

*Sabanaeff, L., 1871, 461.

St. Helena, birds introduced into (see
Melliss, J. C.).

Salmon, T. K., expedition to the United
States of Columbia, 1872, 92.

*Salvadori, T., 1871, 462; 1872, 451;
1873, 477.,

Salvadori, T., letter on Aithopyga lodoi-
sia and Pitta berte,1871, 248 ; ‘ Fauna
d'Italia,’ notice of, 1872, 187; on Ho-
mochlamys luscinia, 1873, 179; on
some New-Guinea birds, 1876, 267;
letter on Bornean and New Guinea
birds, 1876, 277; letter on birds of
Celebes &c., 1876, 385; letter on Ta-
tare ? viridis, 1876, 506.

*Salvadori,T., and Antinori,A., 1873,478.

Salvadori’s ‘ Uccelli di Borneo’ noticed,
1875, 263.

*Salvin, O., 1871, 463.

Salvin, O., on Central-American Pstitta-
cide, 1871,86; announcement respect-
ing “Recent Ornithological Publi-
cations,” 1871, 102; on the genus Geo-
thlypis, 1872, 147; note on Bonasa
jobsi, 1872, 191; further revision of
the genus Leucopternis, 1872, 239 ; on
the birds of Nicaragua, 1872, 311;
Bonaparte’s ‘ Conspectus Ptiloptero-
rum Systematicus,’ 1873, 103; refer-
enceto Cyanocephalus wiedi, 1873,103 ;
Brandt’s ‘Monograph of Alcide,’ 187 3,
104; note on Fulica alba, 1873, 299 ;

letter on Barbadoes birds, 1873, 333 ;
letter on Guatemalan birds, 1873, 428;
letter on Guatemalan birds, 1874, 99 ;
note on certain Guatemalan birds,
1374, 188; note on application of rules
of nomenclature, 1874, 302; visit. to
the principal museums of the United
States, 1874, 305; on birds of Juan
Fernandez and Masafuera, 1875, 370;
on Central-American Odontophorine,
1876, 379; on new birds from West-
ern Ecuador, 1876, 493.

Salvin, O., and Elliot, D. G., notes on
Trochilidz, the genus Phaethornis,
1873, 1; notes on ‘Trochilide, the
genera Pygmornis, Glaucis, and Thre-
netes, 1873, 269 ; on two species of Lo-
phornis, 1873, 279; notes on Trochi-
lide, the genus Thalurania, 1873, 3538.

Salvin, O., and Sclater, P. L., ornitholo-
gical literature of 1870, 1871, 417;
ornithological literature of 1871, 1872,
413. (See Sclater, P. L.)

Samoan birds (see Layard, E. L., and
Whitmee, S. J.).

Sandwich Islands (see Sclater, P. L:).

Sardinia, birds of (see Brooke, A. B.).

*Saratz J., 1871, 463.

*Saunders, H., 1872, 452; 1873, 479.

Saunders, H., on the birds of Southern
Spain, 1871, 54, 205, 384; on Larus
melanocephalus in England, 1872, 79;
on the extinction of the Francolin in
Sicily, 1872, 80; distinctive characters
of certain species of Circus, 1873, 232;
on immature Rhodostethia rosea,
1875, 484.

Savi’s ‘Ornitologia Italiana’ noticed,
1874, 451.

Saxby’s ‘Birds of Shetland’ noticed,
1874, 448.

Schizorhis concolor, letter on the habits
of (see Exton, H.).

*Schlegel, F., 1871, 464.

*Schlegel, H., 1872, 452; 1873, 479.

Schlegel’s ‘Muséum d’Hist. Nat. des
Pays-Bas,’ 10th livr., noticed, 1874,
454.

*Schmidt, J., 1873, 479.

*Schmidt, M., 1871, 464; 1873, 480.

Scinde birds, letter on (see Hume, A. O.).

*Sclater, P. L., 1871, 464; 1872, 454;
1873, 480.

Sclater, P. L., the genus Spermophila,
1871, 1; birds of the Sandwich
Islands, 1871, 356; revision of the
genus Sycalis, 1872, 39; on the posi-
tion of Peltops, Eurylemus, and
Todus, 1872, 177; on a new Lori-
culus, 1872, 3823; note on Pyranga
roseogularis, 1873, }25; additions to

Xil GENERAL INDEX.

the birds of Nicaragua, 1873, 372; the
Prionochili of British India, 1874,
1; note on the correct name for the
Little Grebe, 1874, 98; Jelski’s Pe-
ruvian collections, 1874, 100; note
on Larus leucopheus, 1874, 100; on
Pére David's travels in China, 1874,
167; note on Psittacus erithacus,
1874, 185; note on Suya superciliaris,
1874, 185; note on Drepanornis
albertisi, 1874, 186; on the family
Pteroptochide, 1874, 189; Dr. A. B.
Meyer’s discoveries in New Guinea,
1874, 416; on the subfamily Diglos-
sins, 1875, 204; on Turdus javani-
cus and T. schlegeli, 1875, 344; letter
on the spelling of Rhynochetus, 1875,
389; on the genus Chlorochrysa,
1875, 464; ornithological progress
in New Quinea, 1876, 243; ornitho-
logical news from New Guinea, 1876,
357; on recently discovered Callistz,
1876, 407. (See Salvin, O.)

Sclater, P. L., and Finsch, O., ornitho-
logical literature of 1872, 1873, 431.

*Sclater, P. L., and Salvin, O., 1871,
464; 1872, 456.

Sclater, P. L., and Taylor, E. C., orni-
thological notes from Constantinople,
1876, 60.

Scotland, birds of the west of (see Gray,

R.).

*Scott, W. D., 1873, 482.

Seebohm, H., and Brown, J. A. Harvie,
notes on the birds of the Lower
Petchora, 1876, 105, 215, 289, 434.

*Selenka, E., 1871, 466.

*Semper, J. E., 1873, 482.

Severtzoff, N., on new Asiatic birds,1875,
487 (see Dresser, H. E.).

Severtzoff’s ‘Turkestanskie Jevotnie’
noticed, 1874, 173.

Shakespeare, ornithology of (see Harting,
J. H.).

Shanghai birds, letter on (see Swinhoe,

R.).

*Sharpe, R. B., 1871, 469; 1872, 457 ;
1873, 483.

Sharpe, R. B., on two new African
birds, 1871, 100; African Coraciide,
1871, 203, 270; on new African birds,
1871, 414; on birds from the Fantee
country, 1872, 66; on Platystira
and its allies, 1873, 156; on Hiera-
cidea, 1873, 327; onthe genus Todus,
1874, 344; on the genus Glaucidium,
1875, 35; on Accipitres in the Paris
Museum, 1875, 253; on the genus
Strix, 1875, 8324; on anew Teal from
Kerguelen’s Island, 1875, 328; on
the ornithology of Borneo, 1876, 29;

on two new South-African
1876, 52. (See Layard, B. L.)

Sharpe's ‘Catalogue of Birds,’ vol. ii.,
noticed, 1876, 273.

*Sharpe, R. B., and Dresser, H. E.,
1871,472; 1872, 459; 1873, 483.
Sharpe, R. B., and Dresser, H. E., ‘ Birds
of Europe,’ notice of, 1872, 186; re-

viewed, 1873, 94.

*Sharpe, R. B., and Ussher, H. T., 1873,
484.

Sharpe, R. B., and Ussher, H. T., on
new Hantee-country birds, 1872, 181.

*Shelley, G. H., 1873, 484.

Shelley, G. H.,on Egyptian ornithology,
1871, 38, 131, 809; ‘ Birds of Egypt,’
announcement of, 1872, 193; six new
West-African birds, 1873, 138; ona
new West-African Timaliine bird,
1874, 89; note on Dryotriorchis,
1874, 90; three months on the coast
of 8. Africa, 1875, 59; notes on Afti-
can birds, 1875, 379.

Shelley’s ‘Birds of Egypt’ reviewed,
1873, 91.

Shelley, G. E., and Buckley, T. E., bird-
collecting on the Gold Coast, 1872,
281.

‘Shore-shooting, Hints on’ (see Harting,
J. E.).

Sinai, on the avifauna of the desert of
(see Kennedy, A. W. M. C.).

*Smith, A. C., 1871, 473.

Smith, Sir A., death of, 1872, 474.

*Smithsonian Institution, 1872, 461.

Snowy Owl (see Gurney, J. H.).

Somateria stelleri, note on (sce Gurney,
J. H.).

South-African birds, additional species
of (see Layard, E. L.).

South-African ornithology (sce Layard,
EH. L.).

*Southwell, T., 1871, 473 ; 1872, 461.

Spain, birds of Southern (see Saunders,
H., and Irby, L. H.); Southern, addi-
tions to the birds of (see Irby, L. H.).

Sperling, R. M., notes on Albatrosses
and the Rhea, 1872, 74; notice of the
death of, 1874, 465.

Spermophila, the genus (see Sclater).

Spilornis, on a Ceylonese species of (sce
Gurney, J. H.).

Spitsbergen, additions to the birds of
(see Newton, Alfred).

*Stack, J. W., 1872, 461.

Steatornis caripensis (sce Murie, J.).

*Steenstrup, J., 1873, 485.

*Stein, F., 1871, 473.

Sterna leucoparia breeding in India (see
Anderson, Andrew).

*Stevenson, H., 1871, 473; 1872, 461.

birds,

GENERAL INDEX.

Stevenson, H., letter on the red colour-
ing of Gypaetus, 1876, 276.

Stevenson, H., ‘ Birds of Norfolk, notice
of, 1871, 252.

*Stoliczka, F., 1871, 474; 1873, 485.

Stoliczka, F., notice of the death of,
1874, 470.

*Stolker, C., 1873, 485.

*Stone, J., 1873, 486.

‘ Stray Feathers,’ notes on (see Blanford,
Wi T.);

*Streets, T. H., 1871, 474.

Striges, on certain species of (see Gur-
ney, J. H.).

Strix, on the genus (sce Sharpe, R. B.) ;
candida, letter on (see Ramsay, E. P.).

*Sundevall, C. J., 1871,475; 1872, 461 ;
1873, 486.

Sundevall, J., ‘ Methodi naturalisAvium
disponendarum Tentamen,’ Part II.,
noticed, 1873, 3822; death of, 1875,
424,

Suya superciliaris, note on (see Sclater,

clu ).

*Swinhoe, R., 1871, 476; 1872, 462;
1873, 488.

Swinhoe, R., return to Ningpo, 1871,
252; visit to Ningpo, 1872, 206; de-
scription of Ardetta eurhythma, 1873,
73; letter on Chinese birds, 1873, 95;
a new species of Ketupa, 1873, 129 ;
letter on birds seen at Ceylon and
during a voyage to China, 1873, 227;
on Ibis nippon, 1873, 249; Chinese
ornithology, 1873, 361; letter on
Shanghai birds, chiefly Limicolz, 1873,
423; on birds from Hakodadi, 1374,
150; letter on certain Chinese Syl-
viide, 1874, 182; letter on Shanghai
birds, 1874, 182; notes on Chinese
ornithology, 1874, 266; ornitholo-
gical notes made at Chefoo, 1874, 422 ;
1875, 114; letter on Asiatic Pyrrhule,
1874, 463; letter on certain Japanese
and Chinese birds, 1875, 1438, 145; on
Hakodadi birds, 1875, 447; letter on
Turdus chrysopleurus, 1875, 519;
on birds from Hakodadi, 1876, 330 ;
letter on Porzana exquisita, 1876,
507.

Sycalis, revision of (see Sclater, P. L.).

Sykes, W. H., the death of, 1872, 343.

‘Sylvan’ (see Dresser, H. E.).

Sylvia melanothorax, description of (see
Tristram, H. B.); rama, letter on (see
Dresser, H. E.).

Sylviidez, letter on certain Chinese spe-
cies of (see Swinhoe, R.); letter on
certain Indian species of (see Brooks,
W. E.); note on certain species of
(see Blanford, W. T.).

SER. III.— VOLS. I.—VI.

xill

Syrrhaptes paradoxus (see Tristram, H.
B., also Gray, R.).

*Taczanowski, L., 1871, 478; 1872, 463;
1873, 488

Tatare? viridis,noteon (see Salvadori,T.).

Taylor, H. C. (see Sclater, P. L.).

Taylor, G. C., ornithological observa-
tions in the Crimea, Turkey, Sea of
Azov, and Crete, 1872, 224.

*Taylor, R., 1873, 488.

Teal, on a new species of (see Sharpe,
R. B.).

Thalurania (see Salvin, O., and Elliot,
D.G

Thaumalea amherstiz, note on (see
Cooper, T. T.).

Tickell (see Walden, Viscount).

Timaliine bird, new species of, from West
Africa (see Shelley, G. E.).

Todus (see Sharpe, R. B.); its position
(see Sclater, P. L.).

Transvaal, birds of (see Gurney, J. H.) ;
ornithology of (see Ayres, Thomas).

Travers, H. H. (see Hutton, F. W.)

*Travers, H. H., and Hutton, F. W.,
1873, 489.

*Travers, W. T. L., 1872, 463 ; 1873,
489.

Tribonyx mortieri from New Zealand
(see Hutton, F. W.).

Trichostoma, on a new species of (see
Walden, Viscount).

*Trippe, T. M., 1872, 463; 1873, 489.

*Tristram, H. B., 1871, 479 ; 1872, 463.

Tristram, H. B., on the synonymy of
certain Phylloscopi, 1871, 109; on
palearctic Passeres, 1871, 231; Ex-
pedition to Moab, 1872, 205; on a
new Sylviad, 1872, 296; Syrrhaptes
paradoxus in Northumberland, 1872,
334; on birds from New Hebrides,
1876, 259.

Trochilide (see Salvin, O., and Elliot,
D; Gh):

Troglodytes punctatus (see Walden,
Viscount).

*Tschusi-Schmidhofen, V., 1871, 479;
1872, 464; 1873, 489.

Turdus chrysopleurus, letter on (see
Swinhoe, R.); javanicus and T. schle-
geli (see Sclater, P. L.).

Turkestan, Severtzoff's ‘Fauna’ of (see
Dresser, H. E.).

Turkey, birds of (see Taylor, G. C.).

*Tytler, R. C., 1871, 480.

Upupide (see Murie, J.).

Ussher, H. T., on the ornithology of
the Gold Coast, 1874, 43. (See Sharpe,
R. B.)

—

r
‘
i
} i
| it:
ai a
“a
‘F 7 i
Wit F
a bie or
, i a
} a |
by i
t
i |
an fi
ral} |
} |
l HH) : :
i iy
i ee
1 Aa § Yi
{ W 4
it
it |
if
;
1
Nil t }
h 7
i
ny
4 ‘\
j a \<
j bth
: ai
Cain /
ii} q ahs
i
j
rae seh
1 in if
5 Ni
4
!
i@ jj 11) Wea
}
i ||
DP Ltt
} 4 it
: !
fea
; ne i
{ ; i
) f if
mem pie
tlh F
Wh Lan
fa el
ee
| l
4
ea wil
aa
r ned
| J
My) | i
at }
} \ ‘)
| |
| |
’ en (ae Wty
pide We
aii NN a
i
hi
‘iy
i)
ni
ay
Saar
M ee be
‘ H
"i }
DP aot
nae
Pa all!
tf ‘
5 ik
i
ea
ue i
} i

XIV GENERAL INDEX.

*Verreaux, J., 1371, 480; 1872, 465.

Verreaux, J. P., notice of the death of, oa

~ 1874, 467.

*Vian, J., 1873, 490. (See Alléon, A.)

*Villada, M. M., 1871, 480

*Vogel, G., 1873, 490.

*Vouga, —, 1872, 466.

Vultur auricularis, dates of laying (see
Gurney, J. H.). ~

*Wahlgren, F., 1872, 466.

*Walden, Viscount, 1871, 480; 1872,
466 ; 1873, 490.

Walden, Arthur, Viscount, letter stating
that Prinia albogularis=P. hodgsoni,
and Hphialtes jerdoni=H. malabari-
cus, 1871, 112; on the birds of Negros
Island, Philippines, 1872, 93; on
certain species of Cyornis, 1372, 330;
birds of Northern Borneo, 1872, 360;
Polihierax fieldeni and Erythrosterna
parva, 1872, 471; letter on Troglody-
tes punctatus, Blyth, 1874, 91; on
Andaman birds, 1874, 127; on "Mr.
Allan Hume's review of ‘Die Papa-
geien, 1874, 270; letter on Gecinus
erythropygius, 1875, 148; letter on
Paleornis melanorhynchus, 1375,
270; on birds from Burma, 1875,
458; letter on Artamus leucorhyn-
chus, 1876, 133; on Tickell’s ‘ Illus-

trations of Indian Ornithology,’ 1876, .

336; on a new Trichostoma, 1876,
376 ; letter on Sterna albigena, 1876,
384 ; on Andaman-Island birds, 1873,
296. (See Godwin-Austen, H. H.)
*Wallace, A. R., 1871, 481.
Wallace, A. R., on the arrangement of
the order Passeres, 1374, 407.

Warbler, on a new Marsh- (see Dresser,
H. #.).

Waterhouse, F. H., list of periodicals
of 1872 containing ornithological
papers, 1873, 493.

Wharton, C. Bygrave, on the orni-
thology of Corsica, 1876, 17.

White, Gilbert, letters to Robert Mar-
sham, 1875, B21.

White's * History of Selborne” new
edition, edited by Harting, noticed,

| 1375, 262.

Whitmee, S. J., on Samoan birds, 1875,
436.

*Whitney, J. D., 1871, 481.

*W ickevoort- Crommelin, J. P., 1871,
482.

*Williams, W. L., 1872, 467.

*Wood, T. W., 1372, 467 ; 1873, 493,

*Wood, W., 1873, 493.

*W ood, W.T., 1871, 482.

Woodpecker, cranial peculiarities of
(see Garrod, A. H.). -

Wright, C. A., on. birds of Malta and
Gozo, 1874, 223.

Wyatt, C. W., on birds of U.S. of
Columbia, 1871, 113, 319, 373.

Wyatt's Report of the Or dnance Survey
of Sinai,’ 1873, 429.

Yarkand, the birds of, announcement
of a work on, 1872, 195.

Yarrell’s ‘ British Birds’ (see Newton,
A.).

‘Zoology of the Voyage of the Erebus
and ‘lerror, Appendix, noticed, 1375,
511.

! Si Puen
an 4 i iy 4 ain
ty er RPL SN ED : ; ,
i NEV t CIS be “ 4 oi Isp are j f
ay et $ hha ie i ues Me : Wrenn a i the aevtaspet ; F a He
A) y ee r ty : Fed 4 ‘ : Haden Fs ; aiytee
i, Per rae te aii \ : i 4

Sb? WV
ait e i
Ga

eas a
bayer
at

ue e7F PS
‘ an shgnert

ee
i Ua
weap
vipisneinie!
iby eae
Bek Pit
ft tit mi ¥ je af Hee

Hb eay
rte iit
Tih eaten

ei ttt)

‘ le hie NG 5 : :
Hato ate a ; aE id arr bine? i
i A orsetereieiessatibiets PANG ak RU
ee pity HES | Shy nye $1 f Haga ie es
tee

D)
, bed
5 FOR by tp
i eet -

oar

iene
Laden
fore

he mbpe ue
Hy Ube

White ty
ify! ny nt

i ail
ie
ha

i
iy
4)

—

s te
SSS SSS

Me 4
My Te
vi tt
n
hppe f ; : prs a et ;
He +a i wis iF AU 4 i - ‘ Het heliyng os

Yep tig!

bei iene
Mo otieishbe

We ite vit Pky

i
: uve
Ae HOA
hen ae ane 4

sit a
, neh i.
HC tee
tip

tad Leone Wie ba he lie
i Pisa
Pi ait ty

UIHPNE (0 Tif

Nee

te
erry
it

it hes pe 3)
JN OR ASR LSet !
eit ba Ae 4 ‘ & : Pb sh

rene ror : et ALE CRABUAR TR eS
Live ne eae? ‘

vet
ae

gis

Be dupa A 4 atta
we he pth ae yee RSET OAR ae

Np P fp "

i : veetienediie ; , is
nea { ; ' y af ue , iby athe ie
f rei thet Howeile bee ed ; iy "e ne : esi) SNe Mteg eet
ue ciiaemeamaaitalereuninninwii ade Ai EAE a ly

ay heh t bot,

i
A
i}

rt
types i end de
ip Ata i pi biases
tHE UE RM try eteirdteaeerregect
btel a Tat +) apt f SULHY he erase ,

$
gery Fe Elda ta a .
: dhpyd aa ae fy 4 eRe eye ;
4h 1‘ a reMbukone
Giedsct cht penetiotdot cae ¥ y ‘ $ wiadaneagh
titi
he) BOE hee
ip ie
revert ita
ftetgivael hy ya aru thal ea ot
or ’ t

seal ? “ee me Aart Roba

Internet Archive Audio

Featured

Top

Images

Featured

Top

Software

Featured

Top

Books

Featured

Top

Video

Featured

Top

Mobile Apps

Browser Extensions

Archive-It Subscription

Save Page Now

Full text of "The Ibis"

See other formats