| Volume H ? JVumber 2 September 2012
MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT
Bylaws. Just mentioning that word is probably enough to ensure that some of you will stop reading
from this point and turn to another page. I wouldn’t blame you. I think you’d have to be leading a
pretty dull life if you found bylaws interesting. It doesn’t reflect well on me then, when I tell you that
over the last three years of my presidency I’ve had more than just a passing acquaintance with the RRF
bylaws.
The thing is, as tedious and boring as they are, our bylaws are also incredibly important as they provide
the framework for effective governance. They’re the internal rules of our Foundation and serve several
important functions. Not only do they fulfil the legal requirements of a non-profit organisation by
defining the purpose of RRF and describing how the Foundation operates, they also provide guidance
for the Board’s decision-making and ensure that our standards are consistent. They also protect us all,
both individually and collectively, from the grip of any tyrant seeking despotic rule. This last scenario
is unlikely, I know, but my personal view of the proposed Society for Ornithology is not too far from
this description.
The origin of our current bylaws rests with the founders of RRF. I think they showed a great deal of
foresight when they wrote these rules, over forty years ago, and that only a few minor tweaks have
been needed over the years is evidence of that. However, although these bylaws have served us well,
the Board has agreed that it’s time to revisit the paperwork and consider some modernisation. Mike
Kochert has recently carried out a painstaking review of our current bylaws and in the coming weeks
the Board will be considering his suggestions. Once that part of the process has finished, you as
members will be asked to vote on whether to accept or reject any proposed changes. Watch this space.
Modernisation is a recurring theme in other areas of our work:
Thanks to JRR Editor, Cheryl Dykstra, a new system of electronic submission of papers via the
PeerTrack website was rolled out in June. This system makes the peer review and publication process
quicker and smoother for authors, reviewers and editors. You can also register your interest as a
potential reviewer. See the RRF website for details:
http://www.raptorresearchfoundation.org/publications/iournal-of-raptor-research/submission-
guidelines
RRF Scientific Programme Chair, James Dwyer, is currently exploring a novel idea to increase
awareness of, and access to, abstracts published in JRR. It’s early days and there are a few technical
issues that need addressing but if he can make it work, RRF will be well and truly embracing the
digital era. I don’t want to steal his thunder so I’ll leave it to James to report, hopefully in the next
edition.
WinAsTDan 21(2)
September 2012
Finally, planning is well underway for RRF’s first
ever annual conference in Argentina next year,
thanks to the work of Miguel Saggese and his
colleagues on the Local Organising Committee.
Watch the RRF website for details and early
registration:
http://www.raptorresearchfoundation.org/conferences
/current-conference
RAPTOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC
Best, Ruth
OFFICERS
President: RuthTingay
Vice-president: Ted Swem
DIRECTORS
Eurasian: Fabrizio Sergio
Southern Hemisphere: Miguel Saggese
At Large Outside North America: Marc Ruddock
North America #1: John Smallwood
North America #2: Gary Santolo
North America #3: Rick Harness
Secretary: Greg George
Treasurer: Angela Matz
At Large #1
At Large #2
At Large #3
At Large #4
At Large #5
At Large #6
Munir Virani
Clint Boal
Rob Bierregaard
Carol McIntyre
Torgeir Nygard
Miguel Ferrer
For more information about the Raptor Research Foundation, Inc. (founded in 1966), please visit the
RRF website at: http://www.raptorresearchfoundation.org/.
Persons interested in birds of prey are invited to join the Raptor Research Foundation (RRF). Wingspan is emailed twice
each year to all members of RRF and is available on the RRF website. Members also receive The Journal of Raptor
Research (ISSN 0892-1016), which is published quarterly. For membership and subscription information, please contact:
Ornithological Societies of North America, 5400 Bosque Boulevard, Suite 680, Waco, TX 76710, USA; 1-254-399-9636
(phone); 1-254-776-3767 (fax); business@osnabirds.org (email); http://www.osnabirds.org (web).
Editor’s Note — Thanks to the following contributors for this issue of the Wingspan : Kate Davis, Julio
Gallardo, Greg George, Matt Giovanni, Laurie Goodrich, Scott Graham, Jose Hernan Sarasola, Gene Jacobs,
Lloyd Kiff, Joan Morrison, Roberto Muriel, Jemima Parry-Jones, Ruth Tingay, Rick Watson, Susan Whaley,
Maria Wheeler.
Wingspan welcomes contributions from RRF members and others interested in raptor biology and management.
Please submit contributions via email to Petra Bohall Wood, Wingspan Editor, at rrfwingspan@mail.wvu.edu .
For long contributions, please send as an MS Word attachment. If you are submitting photos, please include
them within the Word doc with a caption and photo credit.
Contribution deadline for the next issue is 15 February 2013.
All issues of Wingspan and content guidelines are available at:
http://www.raptorresearchfoundation.org/publications/wingspan-newsletter/online-newsletters-pdfs
-2-
Wingspan 21(2)
September 2012
RAPTOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION
2013 ANNUAL CONFERENCE
*’WG» V
October 2013 Bariloche, Argentina
Includes
Raptor Research Foundation Annual Conference 2013
III Neotropical Raptor Conference
VII International Conference on Birds of Prey and Owls
Bariloche, Argentina, October 21-24 2013
For the first time, a joint meeting between the Raptor Research Foundation , the Neotropical Raptors
Network (The Peregrine Fund) and the World Working Group on Birds of Prey and Owls will take
place in South America. A perfect mixture of wild nature and cultural heritage awaits you, so mark
your calendars now and we ensure that you will experience all the wonders the city of San Carlos de
Bariloche, Patagonia and Argentina has to offer.
This international meeting will be held 21-24 October 2013 in the heart of Nahuel Huapi National
Park, Bariloche City, Rio Negro province, Argentina. The conference is hosted by the Universidad
Nacional del Comahue - INIBIOMA/CONICET, Bariloche, Argentina. Pre (workshops) and post
(field trips) conferences activities are also offered.
The conference venue is the Hotel Panamericano Bariloche , a five star hotel in downtown Bariloche.
The local organizing committee chairs are Drs. Miguel D. Saggese , (College of Veterinary Medicine-
Western University of Health Sciences, California, USA), Valeria Ojeda and Sergio A. Lambertucci
(Laboratorio Ecotono, Universidad Nacional del Comahue - INIBIOMA/CONICET, Bariloche, Rio
Negro, Argentina).
The website for the conference with all the information
about the venue, abstract submission and registration
will be available in early September. For additional
information about the conference contact us at
barilocheraptors20 1 3 @ gmail.com or
Conference Committee Chair Kate Davis at
raptors@montana.com
We look forward to seeing you in Bariloche!
-3-
WinAsTDan 21(2)
September 2012
News from the RRF
RRF Grants Update
Submitted by Greg George
The RRF has completed a review of the system used to identify award and grant recipients and
distribute the awards to those individuals. As a result, changes have been made to make the system
more efficient. Under the new requirements the deadline for award and grant applications will be the
same due date as the abstract submission due date for the RRF annual conference, typically in June or
July, each year. Distribution of awards will occur directly after the annual conference, typically in
September or October, each year. For more information please visit the RRF website at
www.raptorresearchfoundation.org .
RRF Conservation Committee Report
Submitted by Joan Morrison and Rick Watson
The purpose of the RRF Conservation Committee is to prepare and disseminate written
communications on contemporary issues of conservation concern involving birds of prey that usefully
lend the RRF’s scientific expertise and credibility to resolution of conservation issues. In 2011, RRF
prepared and disseminated a letter and position statement regarding bills S838 and HR1558 that would
exempt lead ammunition from EPA ruling. In good measure due to the objections of scientists, these
rules were abandoned. However, in March 2012, the NRA (National Rifle Association) and NSSF
(National Shooting Sports Foundation) re-introduced these same bills as one part of an omnibus bill
that includes 4 separate parts. RRF again submitted our letter and position statement on this issue to
the person who heads the committee this year, Mary Bono Mack. The full text of the letter and
comments can be found online at: http://www.raptorresearchfoundation.org/wp-
content/uploads/20 10/1 2/20 11 lead poisoning.pdf .
In February 2012, the RRF prepared and submitted to the US Fish and Wildlife Service a comment on
the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) to permit take as provided under the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Act for the West Butte Wind Project (WBWP) in Oregon. The comments referred to
the risk assessment model and how it should be better quantified through research, and recommended
the strongest research option of the three permit options offered by the Service. The full text of the
letter and comments can be found online at: http://raptorresearchfoundation.org/wp-
content/uploads/20 12/02/20 12 DEA West Butte.pdf
RRF members and others are urged to bring forth, for the Conservation Committee’s consideration,
issues related to conservation of birds of prey that may be appropriate for RRF to comment on.
However, CC’s policy is to comment only on the science behind an issue and only after careful review
and approval by the Board. Requests for RRF to sign in support of another groups' letter falls outside
the CC’s and RRF’s policy guidelines. Members may comment, as individuals, on an issue but in
-4-
WinAsTDan 21(2)
September 2012
doing so should not imply that their personal statements reflect those of RRF. If there are any
questions related to RRF or CC policy, or to raptor-related issues that may be appropriate for RRF’s
input, please contact Rick Watson (RWatson@Peregrinefund.org) or Joan Morrison
(ioan.morrison@trincoll.edu) .
RRF Election Results
Submitted by Laurie Goodrich
The RRF Nominations Committee is pleased to report on the results of the 2012 election for RRF
Board and officer positions. At the close of 2012 the three-year term of five elected RRF Board
members will end: Gary Santolo, North America # 2, Clint Boal, Director at Large #2, Torgeir
Nygard, Director At Large #5, Marc Ruddock, Director At-Large Outside North America, and Ted
Swem, RRF Vice-President. Of these, Torgeir Nygard and Ted Swem decided to re-stand. RRF also
needed to identify a candidate for President-Elect, as the current President, Ruth Tingay, will end her
term as RRF President at the close of the annual meeting in 2013.
The Nominations Committee solicited nominations from the membership, board and officers during
spring 2012. A ballot was prepared in May including two candidates for Director At Large Outside
North America, Oliver Krone and Jemima Parry-Jones; two candidates for North America #2, Gerald
Niemi and Brian Washburn: and, three candidates for two positions as Directors At-Large #2 and #5,
Jim Bednarz, Christopher Briggs, and Torgeir Nygard. Ted Swem ran unopposed for the two-year
term as Vice-President beginning at the close of the annual meeting in 2013. Clint Boal ran unopposed
for President-Elect and will assume the role as RRF President at the close of the 2013 annual meeting
as well.
The Votes were cast by 157 RRF members from 24 countries and elections were close. After the
ballot count by Secretary Greg George, the following people were elected as incoming RRF Board
members for January 2013: Jemima Parry-Jones, Director At-Large Outside North America, Gerald
Niemi, North America Director #2, Torgeir Nygard and Jim Bednarz as Directors At-Large #2 and #5.
Ted Swem was elected as Vice-President and Clint Boal as President-Elect.
RRF thanks each of the non-renewing Directors for their dedicated service to the organization! RRF
also thanks all the candidates for their interest and enthusiasm for RRF and welcomes incoming
Directors. If any member is interested in serving on the board, the election for 2014 board will begin
early next year. RRF welcomes all candidates who have an interest in serving the organization. This
is your organization - help us keep it alive and well!
If you are interested in getting involved, contact Laurie Goodrich, RRF Nominations Chair,
goodrich@hawkmtn.org .
-5-
WinAsTDan 21(2)
September 2012
Raptor News
American Kestrel Partnership
Submitted by Matt Giovanni
The Peregrine Fund officially launched the American Kestrel Partnership and new website in April
2012 (http://kestrel.peregrinefund.org/). The Partnership is growing rapidly, with >200 partners that
registered >600 nestboxes and generated >1300 nest observations across the Western Hemisphere
during the 2012 nesting season. We awarded high-grade field optics via the Leupold Optics and Eagle
Optics Grad Student Gear Grants to students studying American Kestrels, including Elizabeth
Wommack (Ph.D. student, UC Berkeley), Allie Anderson (M.Sc. student, Boise State U), Terra
Gleeson (M.Sc. student, Boise State U), and Taylor Joray (B.Sc. student, Illinois College). The next
round of Gear Grants are now available for online application (http://kestrel.peregrinefund.org/grants-
small) and will be awarded in January 2013. A huge thanks to Leupold and Eagle Optics for their
support, and congrats to the grantees!
We are currently seeking professional scientists and graduate students from the Western Hemisphere
and with ongoing kestrel research programs (or interest in kestrel research programs) to serve on the
Partnership’s Research Development Committee. The committee will generally be responsible for
collaboratively 1) identifying knowledge gaps and associated research goals, 2) identifying prospective
funding sources and developing grant proposals, 3) coordinating research sampling and data
management, 4) modeling and publishing data and results, and 5) adaptively refining research goals
based on knowledge produced. Research topics of interest include but are not limited to nesting
parameters (e.g., phenology, occupancy, survival, and productivity), toxicology, genetics, and fledging
and adult demographics. Contingent on funding availability, The Peregrine Fund expects to support
and host annual or biennial meetings lasting 1-3 days at our international headquarters in Boise, ID.
Committee members with less resources may be eligible for travel support. Please contact Matt
Giovanni (mgiovanni@peregrinefund.org) if you are interested in serving on the American Kestrel
Partnership’s Research Development Committee.
Ten Years of the Center for the Study and Conservation of Birds of Prey in Argentina (Cecara):
Working for the Conservation of Neotropical Raptors
Submitted by Jose Hernan Sarasola, Miguel Angel Santilland & Maria Soledad Liebana
The Center for the Study and Conservation of Birds of Prey in Argentina (CECARA) was created on
October 3, 2001 at the Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales of the Universidad Nacional de La
Pampa, Argentina. Argentina. Its creation was promoted by researchers from Argentina and the United
States, particularly Dr. Marc Bechard from Boise State University, as a means to fill the need for field
research on the problem of raptor conservation in Argentina. The main objectives were to develop a
sound scientific knowledge base for the great diversity of raptors and their habitats in Argentina; to
WinAsTDan 21(2)
September 2012
train scientists capable of carrying out and expanding research programs; and to disseminate results to
the general public, institutions and wildlife managers.
During the austral summer of 1996, a few years before CECARA was established, the Pampas region
of Argentina became infamous in regard to the conservation of raptors in the Neotropics when the
mass poisoning of Swainson’s Hawks (Buteo swainsoni ) with organophosphate insecticides occurred.
Approximately 20,000 hawks were poisoned in agricultural areas in the central part of the country. The
study and conservation of this hawk in its non-breeding habitat was the first order of business for
CECARA researchers, and their work generated valuable information on several aspects of the ecology
of the species that were previously unknown. Over more than ten years, the working group has grown,
and is currently a reference research center for people interested in our area of research, and a space for
training of undergraduate and graduate students from Argentina and other countries in birds of prey
ecology and conservation.
Among other projects, this team composed by teachers from the Universidad Nacional de La Pampa
and researchers and fellows from the National Council of Scientific and Technical Research of
Argentina (CONICET), is engaged in studying and promoting the conservation of the Solitary
Crowned Eagle ( Harpyhaliaetus coronatus) in semiarid environments in central Argentina including
the analysis of the ecological limitations for the species related with breeding, food availability and
habitat selection. This project also focuses on identifying the main threats and causes of mortality for
this endangered species, assessing the impact of human persecution and other anthropogenic factors
upon eagle populations.
Centro para el Estudio y Conservacion
DE LAS AVES RAPACES EN ARGENTINA
- 1 -
WinAsTDan 21(2)
September 2012
The conservation of raptors in agroecosystems and anthropogenic environments is also of high priority
for the CECARA. Current research interests include studying the effects of agricultural frontier
expansion and changes in land use on the ecology of raptor species that occupy these environments,
such as Aplomado Falcon (Falco femoralis), American Kestrel ( Falco sparverius), and Chimango
Caracara (. Milvago chimango). The staff of the CECARA have carried out studies on habitat selection,
movements, food habits and health status on other species including Ferruginous Pygmy Owl
( Glaucidium brasilianum ), Austral Pygmy Owl ( Glaucidium nanum), White-tailed Kite ( Elanus
leucurus), Turkey Vulture ( Cathartas aura). Black Vulture ( Coragyps atratus), Southern Caracara
0 Caracara plancus ), Burrowing Owl ( Athene cunicularia ), and Black-chested Buzzard Eagle
( Geranoaetus melanoleucus).
The CECARA collaborates with researchers from different universities and research centers both
nationally and internationally. CECARA engages in valuable collaboration with students studying
natural resource and environmental engineering and biological sciences, and promotes the training of
graduate students in the conservation of threatened and endangered wildlife.
For more information visit www.cecara.com.ar or contact to cecara@exactas.unlpam.edu.ar
News from the International Centre for Birds of Prey
Submitted by Jemima Parry- Jones
The weather here in the UK has been dire since April - the
wettest months on record from April until July which does
not help visitor numbers or the breeding. However our pair
of Grey Buzzard Eagles, (Geranoaetus melanoleucus) have
not only bred a clutch of two young and reared them to
fledging, but recycled again while the fledged young were
still in their enclosure. And once you see the chicks, there is
no doubt that they are buteos and not eagles! The second
clutch of young are now back with mum and doing well.
I think we must have the largest collection of Steller’s Sea
Eagles in the UK now, two more chicks this year bring us up
to seven of them! Interestingly this year’s chicks have white
tails which the others did not. The African Fish Eagles laid
one fertile egg but it was in a particularly cold spell so we lost it, however they reared a young Indian
Tawny Eagle very nicely which bodes well for the next breeding season. We have a delightful Lesser
Kestrel from a friend who is in training, as well as an Ashy-faced Barn Owl, both are coming along
nicely and we will soon be training young merlins and an Aplomado Falcon as well.
On the research side we are still working with Swansea University and the most interesting project is
the harnesses for attaching satellite telemetry. For years I have been concerned about harnesses, the
lack of control about who can place them on with little or no experience, the time taken putting them
on and the damage done to the birds in some cases, so it is great to working with people who have the
-8-
WinAsTDan 21(2)
September 2012
same concerns and are doing something about it. It is very good to know that our birds may be helping
wild ones in the future.
The vulture project in India and Nepal is going well, the birds are now breeding well and the
management of the breeding is coming along nicely. We have bred from all three species in all three
Centres in India now and have had our first egg in Nepal this year. Scarily though we have found other
species dead with the same or similar symptoms so Diclofenac may be affecting other vultures and
eagle species as well, which is very depressing, but not that surprising.
We have completely redone our website this year and with a system which means we can alter it,
change things and update in minutes as things happen, ourselves which is a joy as we are not reliant on
anyone else now (well apart from a great friend who taught me how to do it and reminds me when I
forget!).
Our White-tailed Sea-eagle did cause a few
problems last week when she started her
demonstration at 1 1.30am on Saturday and
finished it at 2.30pm on Tuesday, which meant
we had to all the flying indoors on the only dry
days we have had for weeks! On the other hand
she did look rather good on my chimney!
Finally this year was our 45 anniversary, that
makes us the oldest dedicated bird of prey centre
worldwide. We had a good party and HRH The
Princess Royal joined us for a great day on May
15th. All the birds behaved impeccably and flew
brilliantly, the staff behaved impeccably and so
did the dogs! Photos by Linda Wright
Updates from the Eastern Golden Eagle Working Group (EGEWG)
submitted by Maria Wheeler and Charles Maisonneuve on behalf of the EGEWG
The Eastern Golden Eagle Working Group had its second-ever meeting from July 1 1 th - 14 th in Ste.-
Anne-des-Monts, a small town on the Gaspe" Peninsula in Quebec, Canada. In attendance were
representatives from academia, industry, and both state/provincial and federal level wildlife agencies.
The goal of the meeting was to provide updates on statuses, share information about on-going research,
and plan for future group efforts.
At the meeting, updates were given on golden eagle activity in different states and provinces. Junior
Tremblay and Charles Maisonneuve of the Quebec Ministere des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune
discussed goldens nesting in Quebec. Charlie Todd of Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and
Wildlife discussed the history of golden eagles in Maine. Mark Martell of the Minnesota Audubon
Society presented telemetry data on birds that had been wintering on the Northern Plains. Kieran
WinAsTDan 21(2)
September 2012
O’Malley of West Virginia Division of Natural Resources gave an update on golden eagles sightings in
West Virginia during winter camera trapping. Lastly, Craig Koppie of US Fish and Wildlife, Region 5,
presented a summary of golden eagle activity in Maryland over the past two years.
Also discussed at the meeting were various ongoing research efforts focusing on different areas of
golden eagle ecology and behavior. Dave Brandes of Lafayette University gave an update on his work
with modeling the interaction of terrain and wind to quantify collision risk at wind farms. Adam Duerr
of West Virginia University discussed the role of weather in bird migration in eastern North America.
Trish Miller of West Virginia University gave updates on two projects: first on scale dependence of
flight paths of migratory golden eagles and second on age and seasonality driving spatial use patterns
and movements in eastern golden eagles. Mike Lanzone of Cellular Tracking Technologies presented
findings on golden eagle winter ecology, discussing such factors as terrain, foraging, home range size,
and behavior. Andrew Dennhardt of West Virginia University shared details of his up-and-coming
work with estimating population size using modeling from migration counts. Maria Wheeler of
Duquesne University updated the group on findings of golden eagle population genetics from both a
contemporary and historic perspective — including a twist with international golden eagle specimens.
Todd Katzner discussed his camera trapping project, which is fairly widespread across the eastern US
and has caught images of a wide variety of species in addition to golden eagles. Finally, Chris Farmer
of Tetra Tech presented on the role of conservation in wind energy planning and development.
The group concluded the meeting with exciting field trips to several golden eagle nests — both active
and inactive — across the peninsula. It was also agreed to hold the EGEWG’s next meeting in West
Virginia in winter 2013-2014, peak eagle season there. For more information on golden eagles in
eastern North America, several group members will be at NAOC this August or you can check out
their website at www.egewg.org !
-10-
WinAsTDan 21(2)
September 2012
News from the Peregrine Fund
Submitted by Susan Whaley
Kenya summit addresses decline of vulture species
The first Pan- African Vulture Summit was held April 16-20 in Kenya’s Masai Mara National Reserve
to address the alarming decline of vulture species, some now listed as endangered, due to poisoning,
habitat loss, and trade in body parts for witchcraft.
The Peregrine Fund’s Munir Virani, director of The Peregrine Fund’s Africa programs, was elected to
a key leadership role at the summit. He was named the African Representative of the Vulture Specialist
Group of the IUCN Species Survival Commission and will chair the African Steering Committee,
which will oversee implementation of the Pan African Vulture Conservation Strategy.
Representatives of the 32 organizations at the summit signed a resolution calling on governments
throughout Africa to support vulture conservation by enacting conservation plans, prosecuting those
engaged in illegal killing and trade, and reducing threats to vultures through regulation, research, and
education.
Aplomado Falcon chicks released for first time at Texas state park
The colorful Aplomado Falcon is regaining a foothold in parts of Texas where they disappeared more
than a half-century ago. In July, Peregrine Fund biologists released captive-bred Aplomado Falcons to
the wild for the first time at Mustang Island State Park on the Gulf Coast.
The park helps fill in a gap in habitat occupied by restored falcon populations that are now well-
established and self-sustaining. Currently, there are about 34 nesting pairs in South Texas, spreading to
the north and south of Mustang Island, including the Aransas National Wildlife Refuge Complex and
Laguna Atascosa National Wildlife Refuge.
Outpouring of support saves rare Orange-breasted Falcon chicks
Two Orange-breasted Falcon chicks from
Belize have recovered from a near-fatal
infestation of bot flies and are safe in a
Peregrine Fund facility, thanks to the
efforts of numerous government agencies,
veterinary experts, and conservation
groups determined to save a remnant
population of the species from extinction.
The chicks were found in a semi-
conscious state during routine banding
operations in the Maya Mountains. After a
-u-
WinAspan 21(2)
September 2012
week of hands-on treatment, the chicks began to recover but were unable to survive in the wild.
Thanks to many fast-acting individuals and agencies in Belize and the United States, the team was able
to take the birds to The Peregrine Fund’s facility in Wyoming, where the chicks will become part of
the captive breeding program and provide long-term data on the impact of bot-fly infestations on
falcons’ health.
Ramsar wetlands designation aids Madagascar Fish Eagle
The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance and the Madagascar government
recently declared the Mandrozo Lake region to have global value in the effort to preserve the Earth’s
biodiversity. The worldwide recognition is good news for the Madagascar Fish Eagle and other
endangered wildlife. The Peregrine Fund has worked in this region for five years and pushed
vigorously for the recognition. The organization has completed all the steps necessary for the
Malagasy government to declare the larger Tambohorano region, which includes Mandrozo Lake, to
be part of the nation’s Protected Areas System and is awaiting final approval, now expected in
December 2012.
/y 9f.
%
Third wild-hatched California Condor chick visually confirmed in July
A Peregrine Fund biologist provided visual confirmation in July that a wild-hatched California Condor
chick is present in a nest cave deep in Grand Canyon National Park. That brings to three the number of
wild condor chicks produced by the Arizona-Utah flock this season. The field crew suspected that a
chick had hatched but didn’t make it official until they had visual confirmation.
The other two chicks were observed and confirmed in May, one in the Grand Canyon and one at
Vermilion Cliffs National Monument. In July, there were 77 condors in the wild in Arizona and Utah,
including the new chicks. A total of 18 chicks have hatched in the wild since condors were first
introduced in Arizona in 1996.
-12-
WinAspan 21(2)
September 2012
Successful Restoration of Two Large-Size Raptors in Southern Spain:
The Spanish Imperial Eagle and the Osprey
Submitted by Roberto Muriel, Miguel Ferrer and Eva Casado
The Spanish imperial eagle ( Aquila adalberti) and the osprey ( Pandion haliaetus ) constitute clear
examples of symbolic raptor species that had drastic population declines during the first half of the
20th century in Spain due to rapid habitat changes, increasing non-natural mortality, and direct
persecution. This led to the complete extirpation of the osprey from mainland Spain in 1981 and the
reduction of the endemic Iberian Spanish eagle population down to only 40 breeding pairs in the
1970s. Currently, the Spanish imperial eagle is classified as Endangered in the Spanish National
Catalogue of Endangered Species with 330 breeding pairs in 201 1, and the osprey is listed in the
National Red List as Critically Endangered since only around 30 breeding pairs remain in very small
populations in Canary Islands and Balearic Islands. Reintroduction programs were initiated for both
species.
Between 2002 and 2011, 87 young Spanish imperial eagles translocated from Sierra Morena
population (Andalusia) were released using hacking techniques at four locations in the province of
Cadiz and in Dohana National Park in Andalusia. In 2006 the first territorial pair was observed near the
release sites in Cadiz and the first successful breeding pair was recorded in 2010 with two fledglings.
In 2012, the reintroduced population consisted of five occupied territories in Cadiz, two of which
raised successfully five fledglings in total. The restored population has enhanced effective inter-
population connectivity, since non-released eagles have recruited into the restored nucleus and released
individuals have emigrated to nearby existing populations. The reinforcement and management plan
carried out in the Dohana population succeeded in increasing its population size and fecundity,
balancing sex ratio and increasing population viability.
In 2003, an osprey reintroduction program began in southern Spain in two different locations in the
region of Andalusia, the Barbate inland reservoir in the province of Cadiz and Odiel Marshes, a coastal
marshland in the province of Huelva, both are wintering and migratory passing areas for the species.
From 2003 to 2012, 182 young ospreys translocated from Germany, Scotland and Finland, were
hacked in both areas. In 2005 and 2006, a non-reintroduced breeding pair settled in Guadalcacin
reservoir near the release location in Cadiz, probably attracted by released young ospreys. They laid
eggs both years but they did not hatch. To encourage site fidelity, nestlings from Germany were
fostered and were normally reared by the adults. The first successful breeding pair composed of
reintroduced ospreys was recorded in Odiel Marshes in 2009, when two young fledged. By 2012, the
population had increased to seven breeding pairs in Andalusia producing 10 fledglings: six in Odiel
Marshes and four in reservoirs of Cadiz province (Barbate and Guadalcacin reservoirs).
Populations of both species are close to the self-sustaining threshold, the ultimate aim of reintroduction
programs and a necessary achievement to qualify them as definitively successful. More detailed
information on both projects is available in two published articles: Muriel et al. 2010. First successful
breeding of reintroduced ospreys in mainland Spain. Ardeola 57:175-180; Muriel et al. 2011.
Settlement and successful breeding of reintroduced Spanish imperial eagles in the province of Cadiz,
Spain. Ardeola 58:323-333.
- 13 -
WinAspan 21(2)
September 2012
Left: Young ospreys reintroduced in Odiel Marshes (Andalusia, Spain) on an artificial feeder visited
also by magpies. Right: Young Spanish imperial eagles released in the province of Cadiz ( Andalusia ,
Spain) perched on an artificial feeder.
ANNOUNCEMENTS and BRIEF NEWS ITEMS
For Sale
RRF Publications, Pins, and Decals - Hard copies of The Journal of Raptor Research (Vol. 1-30),
most Raptor Research Reports, and RRF pins and decals may be purchased directly from RRF (Angela
Matz, 101 12th Ave., Room 110, Fairbanks, AK 99701, USA; email: angela matz@fws.gov) . See
http://raptorresearchfoundation.org/back issues jrr.htm for details and prices. Orders for 4 or more
issues receive a 30% discount. Hard copies of The Journal of Raptor Research (Yol. 31+) may be
purchased from Ornithological Societies of North America (5400 Bosque Blvd, Suite 680, Waco, TX
76710, USA; phone: 1-254-399-9636; email: business@osnabirds.org ; web:
http://www.osnabirds.org) . Some older issues are not available in hardcopy; but all issues from Yol. 1-
39 are available on SORA ( http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/irr/) for free download.
-14-
WinAsTDan 21(2)
September 2012
Announcements
Raptor Workshop: Accredited through University of Wisconsin - Stevens Point
Three 5-day workshops entitled "Introduction to Raptor Field Techniques" will be held in Stevens
Point, WI by Eugene Jacobs and Loren Ayers of the Lin wood Springs Research Station. Fall Sessions:
17-21 September, and 8-12 October 2012. Receive first-hand experience working with: live raptors,
capturing, handling, banding techniques, broadcast call surveys, tree climbing, rappelling, blood
sampling and more. Cost is $435 and space is limited, so register early. For more information and a
registration form visit http://www.RaptorResearch.com
Raptor Books and Publications
The Peregrine Fund Research Library has a large quantity of duplicate author reprints and
photocopies of journal articles on raptors which we would like to give away for the cost of shipping.
Our preference would be to donate this collection to a raptor-oriented organization, but all inquiries
will be seriously considered. We continue to accept reprint collections and most journals, and all
donations are tax deductible. Contact lkijf@peregrinefund.org.
New book by The Peregrine Fund compiles research on Neotropical species — The results of a
decade-long project by The Peregrine Fund to study little-known birds of prey in Central America are
now available in the organization’s latest book with important new information for raptor experts.
“Neotropical Birds of Prey: Biology and Ecology of a Forest Raptor Community” is published by
Cornell University Press. It is edited by David F. Whitacre, with a foreword by J. Peter Jenny,
president of The Peregrine Fund. The 412-page hard-cover book is illustrated with photographs of
rarely seen species like the Ornate Hawk-Eagle, Barred Forest-Falcon, and Mexican Wood Owl. It
may be ordered online from Cornell University Press or The Peregrine Fund.
http : //www . cornellpres s . Cornell . edu/book/ ? gcoi= 8 0 1 40 1 006 62 8 7 0
http :// shop.peregrinefund.org/
Raptor Research and Management Techniques — Copies are still available from many natural
history booksellers or order from Hancock House online at www.hancockhouse.com . Look for the
reduced price for RRF members.
RECENT THESES ON RAPTORS
Julio C. Gallardo. 2011. Foraging behavior and hunting success of Snail Kite ( Rostrhamus
sociabilis major) in, Catemaco Lake, Veracruz, Mexico. M.Sc Thesis. Institute of Neuroethology ,
University of Veracruz. Veracruz. Mexico. 64 pp.
Snail kites ( Rostrhamus sociabilis ) feed almost exclusively on Pomacea snails and demonstrate two
foraging strategies: perch hunting and flight hunting. This study examined hunting behavior of
immature and adult snail kites at Catemaco Lake during dry and wet seasons. I made 432 observations
-15-
WinAsTDan 21(2)
September 2012
of hunt attempts in the west shore of the lake, during the months of September and December of 2007;
and February, April, May and Jun of 2008. Flight hunting was utilized most in both seasons,
representing 84% of observations, with 16% being perch hunting (z = 19.98, P = 0.0001). Immatures
used perch hunting proportionately more than adults (z = 7.61, P = 0.0001). Immatures hunted
significantly more during the wet season (58.2%) than the dry season (80.3%) (z = 2.95, P = 0.0036).
This is in contrast to results from previous studies, which showed no differences in use of these
hunting behaviors. Mean hunting success was 52.55+4.70%, much less than that reported for this
species in other regions (>80%), including species feeding on invertebrates (>76%). Hunting success
differed between seasons, with 68% during the wet season and 46.87% in the dry season (z= 3.89, P-
0.0001). Immatures had 62.8% hunting success and adults 46.26% (z= 3.46, P= 0.0006). Success from
perches was 85.29% as opposed to 46.43% while in flight (z= 5.90, P- 0.0001). Adult hunting success
was significantly greater during the wet season (71.43%) than during the dry season (44.88%) (z=1.93,
P- 0.0267). Immatures had greater hunting success during the wet season (68.37%) than during the dry
season (54.54%) (z= 1.79, P= 0.0371). Number of individuals and hunting success showed a tendency
towards an inverse linear relationship ( t= 3.94, P- 0.00095). Hunting in flight had a maximum
duration of 7.98 minutes and a minimum of 7 seconds. Time invested in hunting was significantly
different in the wet season (1.34 min) than in the dry season (3.29 min) (t= -5.5923, P- 0.0001). Adults
invested more time than immatures, with a mean of 4.33 minutes and 1.97 minutes, respectively ( t=
5.5554, P= 0.0001). Success tended to be negatively related to time invested in the hunt. These results
are in contrast to those reported in other regions. The gregarious nature of this species along with the
biology and population fluctuations of its main prey may dictate the behavior of the snail kite. Lake
Catemaco is a unique setting, where commercial fishing may be the major competitor for the snail kite,
possibly affecting both endemic snail populations and the snail kite itself.
Keywords: Rostrhamus sociabilis , Pomacea patula catemacensis , foraging behavior, hunting success,
Lake Catemaco
diciembre de 2007, febrero, abril y mayo de 2008) y 112 intentos la temporada de lluvias (septiembre
de 2007 y junio de 2008
Graham, Scott A. 2012. Diet Composition, Niche and Geographic Characteristics, and Prey Size
Preference of Barred Owls ( Strix varia) in the Pacific Northwest. M.S. thesis, Boise State
University, Boise, ID, U.S.A. 170 pp.
This thesis comprises three chapters describing my investigations of dietary composition, niche and
geographic characteristics, and prey size preference of Barred Owls ( Strix varia) following their recent
range expansion into the Pacific Northwest. In the first chapter, I examine annual, seasonal, within-
breeding season, and local variation in the diet and evaluate reproductive success as a function of
dietary composition in western Oregon during 2007-2009. Diets were based on 3,686 prey individuals
identified in 1,127 regurgitated pellets collected from 26 owl family areas. Prey identified in pellets
included > 85 taxa (33 mammals, 25 birds, 4 reptiles, 4 amphibians, 1 fish, 3 gastropods, 1 diplopod, 1
collembolan, 12 insects, and 1 crustacean). Based on percent of prey numbers in pellets, owl diets
comprised 64.8% mammals, 2.9% birds, 1.0% reptiles, 9.8% amphibians, 0.3% fish, 6.6% gastropods,
0.2% diplopods, < 1% collembolans, and 14.4% insects. Mean mass of prey in pellets was 55.8 g.
Diets varied between years and seasons and among within-breeding season periods and owl family
- 16 -
WinAsmii 21(2)
September 2012
areas, but were generally dominated by coleopteran beetles, mammalian insectivores, and northern
flying squirrels ( Gloucomys sabrinus). Taxonomic richness of the diet provided an indication of the
versatility of Barred Owls capable of preying on diverse kinds of prey in their expanding geographic
range. Estimated food-niche breadths were generally narrow to moderate, indicating use of
comparatively few to a variety of taxa in large numbers. Spatiotemporal variations in diet appeared to
reflect this species’ adaptation and opportunistic feeding strategies in an area of range expansion.
These results will enable ecologists and land managers to better understand the ecological role played
by Barred Owls in their new environment, including potential effects such as competition for food with
other native fauna of the Pacific Northwest, especially the threatened Northern Spotted Owl ( Strix
occidentalis caurino).
In the second chapter, I compare diet composition among three geographic populations of Barred Owls
in the Pacific Northwest, including the central Coast Ranges in Oregon, Olympic National Park in
northwest Washington, and eastern Cascades in central Washington during the breeding seasons of
2007-2009, 1997-2009, and 2004-2006, respectively. For this analysis, I examined 1,021 regurgitated
pellets from 25 owl family areas in the central Coast Ranges, 48 pellets from 20 areas in Olympic
National Park, and 57 pellets from 9 areas in the eastern Cascades. The estimated number and total
biomass of prey in pellets was 3,463 prey and 192,951 g in the central Coast Ranges, 187 prey and
1 1,444 g in Olympic National Park, and 336 prey and 12,871 g in the eastern Cascades. The number of
taxa owls used as prey differed among the study areas, with 81 taxa in the central Coast Ranges, 36 in
Olympic National Park, and 32 in the eastern Cascades. Diets were similar between the central Coast
Ranges and Olympic National Park areas in that diets mainly included forest mammals (64.3% and
71.7% of prey numbers, respectively), with a variety of shrews, coast moles ( Scapanus orarius), and
northern flying squirrels predominating in prey numbers and biomass. Owl diets differed in the eastern
Cascades where insects were the most numerous taxa in the diet (47.0% of prey numbers), with beetles
predominating by prey number (45.2%) followed by frogs (18.8%) and flying squirrels (12.2%).
Flying squirrels were the primary source of biomass across all areas (24.8% in the central Coast
Range; 34.0% in Olympic National Park; 41.4% in the eastern Cascades) and occurred in pellets most
of the time. Mean mass of individual prey was 55.7 g in the central Coast Ranges, 61.2 g in Olympic
National Park, and 38.3 g in the eastern Cascades. Food-niche breadth values indicated that although
many prey taxa were taken, the food-niche dimension for each population of Barred Owls was narrow.
Factors contributing to differences in diet among geographic locales likely included disparities in prey
distributions, differences in the number of pellets collected, and likely temporal and local variation in
prey use and prey availability.
In the third chapter, I investigate prey size preference behavior by sympatric, wild Northern Spotted
Owls and Barred Owls in Oregon and Washington. I describe a controlled experiment in which I used
feeding experiments to test the hypothesis that owls will select a larger prey animal when given a
simultaneous choice between a small prey animal ( Mus musculus) and a larger prey animal ( Rattus
norvegicus or Rattus rattus). I performed 30 independent feeding trials with Northern Spotted Owls
(11 females, 19 males) and 17 independent trials with Barred Owls (12 females, 4 males, 1 gender
unknown) during 1 March-31 August 2008. Northern Spotted Owls preferred the smaller prey in 24
trials and the larger prey in 6 trials. Barred Owls preferred the small prey in 9 trials and the larger prey
in 2 trials. Both species exhibited significant preference for the smaller-sized mice. There was no
difference in prey size selection between female and male Northern Spotted Owls; both sexes preferred
smaller prey. Sample sizes for Barred Owls were too small to test for sexual differences. There was no
- 17 -
Winflspan 21(2)
September 2012
interspecific difference in prey size selection between Northern Spotted Owls and Barred Owls. My
results for Northern Spotted Owls were not expected because diets of Northern Spotted Owls are
typically dominated by medium- sized mammalian prey such as northern flying squirrels and woodrats
( Neotoma cinerea and N. juscipes). Wild Barred Owls preferentially selected small prey during feeding
trials, which is consistent with Barred Owl diet in different regions of North America, including the
Pacific Northwest.
NEWS of RRF MEMBERS
RRF member Fabrizio Sergio and his co-authors were awarded the Watson Raptor Science Prize for
2012 for their recent publication: F. Sergio, J. Bias, G. Blanco, A. Tanferna, L. Lopez, J. A. Lemus,
and F. Hiraldo. 2011. Raptor nest decorations are a reliable threat against conspecifics. Science
331:327-330. This annual prize was established to recognize the most outstanding, peer reviewed
scientific publication on raptor ecology, based on research undertaken in Europe.
WINGSPAN
PO Box 6125, 322 Percival Hall
West Virginia University
Morgantown, WV 26506-6125 USA
rrfwingspan@mail.wvu.edu
-18-