Skip to main content

Full text of "A handbook of the practice of forensic medicine : based upon personal experience"

See other formats


This is a digital copy of a book that was preserved for generations on library shelves before it was carefully scanned by Google as part of a project 
to make the world's books discoverable online. 

It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject 
to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books 
are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that's often difficult to discover. 

Marks, notations and other marginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book's long journey from the 
publisher to a library and finally to you. 

Usage guidelines 

Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the 
public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing this resource, we have taken steps to 
prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying. 

We also ask that you: 

+ Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for 
personal, non-commercial purposes. 

+ Refrain from automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort to Google's system: If you are conducting research on machine 
translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us. We encourage the 
use of public domain materials for these purposes and may be able to help. 

+ Maintain attribution The Google "watermark" you see on each file is essential for informing people about this project and helping them find 
additional materials through Google Book Search. Please do not remove it. 

+ Keep it legal Whatever your use, remember that you are responsible for ensuring that what you are doing is legal. Do not assume that just 
because we believe a book is in the public domain for users in the United States, that the work is also in the public domain for users in other 
countries. Whether a book is still in copyright varies from country to country, and we can't offer guidance on whether any specific use of 
any specific book is allowed. Please do not assume that a book's appearance in Google Book Search means it can be used in any manner 
anywhere in the world. Copyright infringement liability can be quite severe. 

About Google Book Search 

Google's mission is to organize the world's information and to make it universally accessible and useful. Google Book Search helps readers 
discover the world's books while helping authors and publishers reach new audiences. You can search through the full text of this book on the web 



at |http : //books . google . com/ 



-fr a-t 



iUiigi Mls^ii^^ 




c^A^r^w ^ 







BOSTON CITY HOSPriAL 



^;:^i3f^.c4^ r?]fnr. 



mm^m 



THE NEW SYDENHAM 
SOCIETY. 

INSTITUTED MDCCCLVUL 



) 



VOLUME XXI. 



HANDBOOK 



OP THE PBACTICB OF 



FORENSIC MEDICINE, 

BASED UPON PERSONAL EXPERIENCE. 



JOHANN LUDWIG CASPER, M.D., 

PKorsasoa or tokimsio xbdicimb xm thb uxitbuitt or bbklim, 

rORBMOIC FSXUCIAK TO TBI COURTS OT JCtTIOIAJil OF BBKUK, AMD XB1UB& OB THB KOTAL CBXt&AIi 
XBOICAL BOAaO OB PmUSUA, BTC*t BTO., BTC 



VOL. III. 

INCLUDING THE BIO-THANATOLOGY OF NEW-BORN CHILDREN, 
AND THE FIRST PART OF 

THE BIOLOGICAL DIVISION. 



T&ANSLATED FBOM THE THIBD EDITION OF THE O&IOINAL BT 

GEORGE WILLIAM BALFOUR, M.D., St. Andeews, 



TBLI.O'W OF TKB BOTAL COLLBOB OF FaTBIClANS, BDIMBOBOH. 



-t ^J ''^ --,. 



THE NEW SYDENHAM SOCIETY, 
LONDON. 



MDCCCLXIV. 



BOSTON MEDIAL LIBRARY 

rRANCIS A. COUNTWAY 

^uSSTof MEDICINE 



Non hypotheses condo, non opiniones vendito 

quod vidi, scripsL 

Stoebk. 



LONDON t 
Printad bj '• W. &o(»b> i, KIrby Street. 
HAtton Garden. 



CONTENTS. 
SPECIAL DIVISION. 



PART SECOND. 

Bio-thanatology of newborn children . . .1 

Statutory reflations . . .1 

§ 75. Introduction . .2 

CHAPTER I. 

Age of the foetus . . . . . • ^ 

§ 76. Foetus and newborn child . . .5 

§ 77. Signs of recent birth . . . .8 

$ 78. Immature, yiable, and mature child . . .13 
§ 79. Continuation. — ^The development of the foetus according to 

months . . . . .15 

§ 80. Continuation. — Signs of maturity of the foetus . .18 

§ 81. lUustratiye cases . . . . .30 

CHAPTER II. 
Of the life of a child during and after birth .33 

Statutory regulations . . .33 

§ 82. Life without respiration . . . .33 

§ 83. Respiration before birth, v<igitus uterinas . .37 

§ 84. The Docimasia pulmonaris. — a. Vaulting of the chest . 41 
§ 85. „ ,> b. The position of the dia- 

phragm . . 48 

§ 86. „ ,f c. The liver test . . 49 

§ 87. ), „ d. Volume of the lungs . 50 

§ 88. „ „ e. Colour of the lungs . 51 

§ 89. „ ,y /. Consistency of the pulmo- 

nary tissue — ^Atelectasis 
— Hypersemia — Hepati- 
zation . . 53 
§ 90. „ » ff' Weight of the lungs and 

heart — Ploucquet's test . 56 
§ 91, „ „ h. The floating of the lungs 

—The hydrostatic test . 62 
§ 92. „ „ a. Artificial inflation • 64 

§ 93. „ „ i3. Emphysema pulmonum 

neonatorum . . 68 

„ „ Postscript to § 93 . 72 



CONTENTS. 

Pace 

§ 94. The DocimasU pulmonaris. — y. Putrescence of the lungs . 74 
§ 95. ,, ,, Post-respiratory sinking of 

lungs . . 76 

§ 96. „ „ t. Incisions into the pulmo- 

nary substance . 78 

§ 97. The centre of ossification in the inferior femoral epiphysis 79 
§ 98. Uric acid deposit in the duett of Bellini . • 80 

§ 99. The remains of the umbilical cord. — The ring of demarca- 
tion. — Mummification. — The separation of the cord . 83 
§ 100. Obliteration of the ducts, &c., peculiar to the foetal circu- 

lation . . . . . .85 

§ 101. Bladder and rectum test . . .86 

§ 102. Ecchymoses . . . . .87 

§ 103. Conclusions as to the probative value of the Docimasia 

pulmonaris • . . . .89 

§ 104. When is the institution of the Docimasia pulmonaris su- 

perflous? . . . . .90 

§ 105. How long has this child lived? And how long is it since 

it died? . . . . .92 

§ 106. Illustrative cases . . . .94 



CHAPTER III. 

Kinds of death peculiar to newborn children . . .109 

§ 107. General . . . .109 

§ 108. Death of the child previous to its birth.-^Fatal injuries in 

utero ...... 109 

§ 109. Death of the child during labour. — a. Subcutaneous effu- 
sion of blood. — Ce- 
phalhaematoma .115 
S 110. „ >, „ h. Cranial injuries. — 

Defective ossification 
of the skull-bones .117 
§ 111* n )> n Illustrative cases . 120 

§ 112. ), „ „ c. Compression ^ and 

coiling of the umbilical 
cord round the child's 
neck. — The mark of 
strangulation . 125 

5 113. „ „ * „ d. Constriction by the 

uterus . .128 

§ 114. Death of the child subsequent to birth. — a. By the fall of its 

head on the floor 129 
5 115* » 9) ,1 Results of precipitate 

birth and their 
diagnosis. 133 

5 116. „ „ „ Illustrative cases . 137 



CONTENTS. 



§ 117. Death of the child subsequent to birth. — h, H aemorrhage from 

the umbilical cord . 
§ 118. „ „ „ Diagnosis . 

§ 119. ,f „ „ Illustratiye cases 

§ 120. Is the mother guilty or not guilty ? . 
§ 121. Illustratiye cases . . . . . 



Page 

147 
148 
149 
154 
158 



BIOLOGICAL DIVISION. 



GENERAL DIVISION, 

Introduction .... 

§ 1. Nature of the Science 
§ 2. Instruction in forensic medicine 



175 
175 
176 



CHAPTER I. 

The forensic medical officials . 

Statutory regulations 
§ 3. Germany and other countries 
§ 4. Relation of the forensic physician to the judge 

Statutory regulations 

CHAPTER 11. 

The medico-legal investigation 
Statutory regulations 
§ 5. General.— Of the presence of the judge 
§ 6. Inspection of the documentary evidence 
§ 7. Place for the examination 
§ 8. Object of the examination 
« 9. „ „ 1 



178 
178 
178 
182 
182 



184 
184 
184 
187 
189 
190 



§ 10. 
§ 11. 

§ 12. 

§ 13. 
§ 14. 



§ 15. 



Disputed capacity for enduring 
imprisonment,— a. Imprison- 
ment for debt . . 191 
b. Penal imprisonment . 195 

2. Disputed ability to appear be- 
fore the Court . . 199 

3. Disputed ability for making a 
livelihood, or for office-bearing 201 

Illustrative cases . . 204 

4. Injuries. — 5. Sexual relations. 

6. Disputed mental condition. 

7. Various legal objects . 209 
Illustrative cases . .211 



TUl 



CONTENTS. 



CHAPTER III. 



Of Uie medieal and medico-lef^ opfauoQ and certificate 
SCatntorj re^aUtkma 
f 16. General .... 
} 17. Of the opbnon giren orallj at the tune of trial 
} 18. Of falaeaeientific certificates 
} 19. lOnatrattre cases 



217 
217 
290 
224 
226 
227 



SPECIAL DIVISION. 



PART FIBST. 
DISPUTED SEXUAL RELATIONS. 



CHAPTER 
Dispntad capacity for reproduction 
Statutory regulations 
1. Impotence 



The male 
The female 



2. „ Examination of both sexes. — 1, 

3* 99 >> „ 2. 

4. ,f Anormality of the genitals . 

6, Capacity for procreation. — Hypospadia and epispadia 

6. ff ,f Hermaphroditism 

Statutory regalations 
i 7. „ „ 1. Incapacity for procreation in 

the male 
{8. „ „ 2. Barrenness in the female 

i 9. Illnstrative cases ..... 



337 
237 
238 
239 
243 
245 
247 
251 
251 

255 
259 
263 



CHAPTER ir 
Disputed loss of virginity 

Statutory Regulations 
I 10. General . 
I 11. Diagnosis of Virginity 
f 12. Continuation 
f 13. Rape 

$ 14. „ Diagnosis, a. The local signs 
f 15. „ „ h. The general signs 

§ 16. ,, „ c. The examination of the linen 

§ 17. ,9 Controversies . 
§ 18. Illustrative cases . 



276 
276 
276 
278 
280 
282 
285 
288 
290 
296 
303 



CONTENTS. 


ix 


CHAPTER III. 




Disputed UDnatural lewdness . 


Page 
. 328 


Statutory regulations 


. 328 


§ 19. General ; . . . 


. 328 


$ 20. Paederastia 


. 330 


§ 21. Tribadism . . . . 


. 335 


§ 22. Sodomy .... 


. 335 


§ 23. Irrumare — Fellare — Cunnilingus^Coprophagia 


. 337 


$ 24. Illustrative cases . 


. 337 


PART SECOND. 




Disputed pregnancy .... 


. 346 


Statutory regulations 


. 346 


§ 25. General .... 


. 349 


§ 26. Diagnosis of pregnancy 


. 350 


§27. „ „ . . . 


. 352 


§28. „ „ . . . 


. 359 


§ 29. Duration of pregnancy 


. 361 


§30. „ „ Protracted gestation 


. 363 


§ 31. „ „ Duration and diagnosis 


of pro- 


tracted gestation 


. 369 


§ 32. Superfoetation 


. 371 


§ 33. Unconscious and concealed pregnancy . 


. 378 



PAET THIED. 

Disputed delivery . . . . . .381 

Statutory regulations . . . .381 

§ 34, General . , . . . .381 

§ 35. Diagnosis of delivery .... 382 

§ 36. „ „ a. Transitory signs of delivery . 384 

§ 37. „ „ 6, Persistent signs of delivery . 387 

§38. Intentional delivery. — Abortion . . .391 

Statutory reg^ulations .... 391 

§39. Abortion . . . . . .394 

§ 40. Of the substitution of children . .397 

Statutory reg^ations .... 397 

§ 41. Injuries to the mother and child during delivery . . 400 

§ 42. Illustrative cases ..... 402 



CASPER 



FOEENSIO MEDICINE. 



PART SECOND. 



THE BIOTHANATOLOGY OF NEW-BORN CHILDREN. 
Stattjtoey Regulations. 

Upon Viability and Monsters : General Common Law. Paet II., 
Tit. 2, § 2. Civil Code, Art. 312. Statute of 24th Ajpbil, 
1854. General Common Law, Part I., Tit. 1, §§ 17 and 18 
(Fi^p. 7, Vol. I.) 

On the institution of the Docimasia pulmonaris : Criminal Code, 
§ 166. Regulations for the performance of the medico-legal 
dissection of human bodies, § 16, &c. {Fide pp. 84 and 91, 
Vol. I.) 

Penal Code of the Prussian States, § 186. — Whoever buries, 
or otherioise disposes of a dead body, without the knowledge of the 
magistrates y is liable to a fine of two hundred dollars (£30), or to 
imprisonment for not more than six months* If a mother bury, or 
otherwise disposes of the dead body of her illegitimate child, without 
the knowledge of the magistrates, she is liable to imprisonment for not 
more than two years. 

Ordinance regarding the carrying out op the Penal Code 
FOR the Prussian States. Art. XII., § 6. — Whoever has been 
Resent a;t a birth, or has found a new-born child, and has not given 
due notice thereof, as required by the Civil Code, within the time ap- 

VOL. III. B 



2 5 75. INTRODUCTION. 

pointed, shall be punished by a fine of one hundred dollars (£15), or 
by imprisonment for not more than six months. 

Penal Code, § 180. — If a mother intentionally kills her illegiti- 
mate child, either during, or immediately after, its birth, she shall be 
punished for the infanticide, by imprisonment in bridewell for from 
five to twenty years. If the child has been intentionally hilled by 
any person other than the mother, or if any other person has assisted 
in the crime, then the ordinary statutes against murder, homicide, or 
participation in such crim^, become applicable, 

IbideM; § 181. — Any pregnant woman who, by external or internal 
means, produces abortion, or the intra-uterine death of the foetus, 
shall be punished by imprisonment in bridewell for not more than five 
years. The same punishment shall be inflicted upon whoever gives or 
employs such means upon a pregnant woman, even with her own con* 
sent, 

§ 182. — Whoever intentionally produces abortion, or the death of 
the fostus in a pregnant woman, without her knowledge or consent, 
shall be punished with imprisonment in bridewell for from five to 
twenty years. Should the woman be thereby killed, the punishment is 
imprisonment for life. 

§ 75. Introduction. 

The doctrines regarding the doubtful Ufe or death of new-bom 
children, in a greater degree than any others in medico-legal science, 
have been from the earliest times, particularly since the end of last 
century, and still continue to be, the object of the most diligent 
inquiries and the most careful observations. Galen mentions the 
colour of the lungs as a criterion of the child having lived, and 
the docimasia pulmonaris is almost two hundred years old (Thomas 
EarthoUnus, 1663). So careful a cultivation of this field ought to 
have ensured its being in a most prosperous condition. But instead 
of this we find, that up to this very time, on no other question are 
opinions so much divided as upon this one. But here, that particu- 
larly holds good which we have so often to complain of in medico- 
legal science, that what the dissecting-table has made good the 
writing-table has spoiled ! Prom the study such a number of doubts, 
considerations, h priori suppositions, and irrelevant judicial contro- 
versies have been thrown into the question, that its basis has been 
shattered over and over again. To allay these doubts and considera- 



§ 75. INTRODUCTION. 3 

tions^ new modes of investigation, and new modes of obtaining proof 
of respiration have been again and again devised, every one more 
complicated than another, and therefore useless in practice, and in 
recent times particularly, when the so-called '^ exact ^' system has 
commenced to force its way also into judicial medicine, certainly not to 
its advantage in its practical application for the purposes of the penal 
code, people have gone so far as to demand an amount of mathema- 
tical certainty in the proof of Ufe, as if any such certainty could be 
required or given in any matters connected with medicine ! Those 
unversed in the matter must truly despair when they read the warn- 
ings which Henke, so long a great authority in our science, without, 
however, the slightest practical forensic experience, that is without 
having ever observed nature as she is, has continually thrown out in 
repeated attacks against the docimasia pulmonaris ; they will despair 
when they read the gloomy colours in which Henke and his nume- 
rous followers have depicted in the one case an innocent woman 
unrighteously condemned to the severest punishment, in the other a 
guilty one just as unrighteously escaping her well-merited chastise- 
ment, because the medical jurist has based his decision upon the un- 
certain and nothing-proving docimasia pulmonaris ! I will not 
adduce the fact, that such warnings have nothing to do either with 
science or with its practical application, since the physician must 
give his opinion without any concern as to its consequences. I will 
not even hint that the supporters of Henke^s scepticism in our day 
come with such warnings post /estum, now that the point at fault, 
the theory of strict judicial proof, has been everywhere cast aside^ 
and this has been left to the conscience and judgment of the jury, 
who take their own course even in purely professional matters, little, 
if at all, disturbed by the deductions of the medical jurist. The only 
question to be discussed is, whether these doubts and objections are 
confirmed by the observation of nature or not? And that question 
I shall endeavour to answer in the following pages. 

There are three questions, as is well known, which, in every 
forensic case of the kind, are either put by the Judge to the physi- 
cian, or spontaneously force themselves upon the attention of the 
latter; these are : — ^The age of the foetus, was it viable or mature? 
Has it, during or immediately after its birth, possessed an inde- 
pendent life ? And if the latter be answered affirmatively, then. How 
has it died P All other questions are accidental, and individual cases 
often present many such besides those mentioned, specially these for 

b2 



4 § 75. INTRODUCTION. 

instance : — How long has the child been dead ? that is, when, pro- 
bably, did the birth occur ? — a point that is often of importance for 
the Judge to know when he has to proceed against the mother. Or, 
Has the birth been intentionally hastened ? — a question which is of as 
frequent occurrence in practice, particularly in the case of the dis- 
covery of immature foetuses, as it is in by far the larger proportion of 
cases not to be answered even with any probability. Or questions 
such as this: — Whether, under the circumstances in which the 
birth of the child took place, it might have immediately died inde- 
pendent of the injuries found upon it? &c. To answer such 
collateral questions, the medical jurist must take his material from 
the circumstances of each individual case; but science supplies the 
means of answering the three chief questions mentioned above. 



CHAPTER I. 

AGE OF THE F(ETUS. 

§76. F(ETus AND Nbw-boknt Child. 

The various stages of man's life are no more sharply divided &om 
each other by physical than by mental characteristics, but pass insen- 
sibly into each other. This is true collectively as well as individually. 
It cannot be determined by scientific criteria where childhood ceases and 
passes into youth or manhood, or what are the bounds which separate 
manhood from old age. Therefore, in so far as civil rights are con- 
nected with these stages, the law has come forward with positive re- 
gulations to supply a basis which medical science was unable to give. 
The best defined of all the stages of man's development from his 
origin onwards is indubitably that between his intra- and his extra- 
uterine life, and no subsequent stage is so sharply divided from its 
predecessor. And yet it is not easy, even here, successfully to draw 
an exact boundary line for the purpose of penal law. Our statutes 
make use of three different expressions, which come now to be con- 
sidered, their interpretation being as it were tacitly presupposed: 
''Births,'' ''Foetuses," and "New-bom Children." The General 
Common Law, Part I., Tit. I., §17, speaks of "Births" without 
human form or appearance (monsters),— an idea which the penal code 
has completely set aside, in which, consequently, malformed and well- 
formed and new-bom children, in respect of the general rights of 
man, of the right to live, are perfectly identical. The penal code 
itself, however, as paragraphs quoted above show, further employs 
sometimes the expression " foetus," and at others that of " child." 
To distinguish between these two we must in the first place take the 
extra-uterine life as our basis, just as it is usual in ordinary medical 
speech to term the child still in the womb, in contra-distinction to a 
child already bom, a "foetus." This distinction has also been 
mentally present with the legislator; since he speaks of secretly dis- 
posing of the body of an ahready bom, therefore (extra-uterine), new- 



6 § 76. FOSTUS AND NEW-BORN CHILD. 

born **cUW^ (Penal code, § 186), of the discovery of a (consequently 
once more extra-uterine) ^' cAild^' (Introductory, &c., § 6). On the 
other hand, he speaks (j?enal code, § 181), of the intentional produc- 
tion of the abortion and death of the ^^/ostwt in its mother's womb,*' 
and (§ 182) of the intentional production of the abortion of the 
^^f(£tus ^' of a pregnant woman. But the chief and most important 
definition, that relating to infanticide, namely in § 180, this dis- 
tinction is not preserved ; since the crime is said to consist in the 
intentional killing of the illegitimate ''child,*' and that either 
'' dimng or '* immediately after its birth, — ^and here, consequently, the 
legislator manifestly designates the still intra-uterine "foetus** — for 
so long as it is still unborn, it is such — ^by the term '' child.** The 
solution of the doubts and difficulties dependant on the use of the 
terms ''foetus** and "child*' we may, however, very properly leave 
to the lawyers, since they are of no importance to a physician, or in 
medico-legal practice, llie physician will never be asked, whether he 
considers the birth before him a "foetus" or a "child," and when 
he has to decide whether an embryo man has been killed " during,** 
or only "immediately after ** his birth, he will know how to deliver 
his opinion quite unconcerned as to whether the being should be 
called a " foetuif or a " child." 

There is stilV another question, however, which may arise, which 
was brought before us in a recent case, and of which one is not 
likely, h priori^ to think ; it is this : Is a mole also a foetus ? The 
medical man of the present day, when it is no longer disputed that 
a mole is the consequence of a fruitful connection, would never 
hesitate to answer affirmatively. 

A servant-girl had accused her master, a physician, of having im- 
pregnated her, and of having in the third month of the non- 
appearance of her menses introduced into her genitals, first " a long 
instrument,*' and subsequently repeatedly "small, three-cornered 
pieces of sponge,** the result of these operations being that in a 
few days " her courses returned in great quantity, and a large lump 
covered with skin passed from her !" The preliminary investigations 
in regard to a jorovocatio abortus was instituted, the injured 
woman was examined by me, and the results of this were such as to 
compel me to give it as my opinion, that the woman had actually been 
pregnant, and had aborted. Since, many other suspicious circum- 
stances were otherwise ascertained against the accused, the charge 
was prosecuted, and he was brought for trial before the jury. Out 



S 76. FOETUS AND NEW-BORN CHILD. 7 

of the two days' trial I merely extract the following as pertaining to 
the present subject. I was asked whether, from the description given 
by the accuser (and fellow-prisoner at the bar), it was to be supposed 
that what had passed from her was a '^ foetus/' since this was a case 
to which the applicability of § 181 of the penal code was doubtful 
{Fid. this in extenso, p. 2, Vol. III.). Of course I had never seen 
the abortion which had come away more than two years previously, 
and nothing in regard to it could be produced but the description 
given above. Of course I could not but declare that this abortion 
might have been a mole, a degenerated ovum, and of the two 
questions put to me, answer the one — ^Does a foetus live in the womb 
of its mother? — affirmatively, and the other — Can a mole become a 
'' child ?" — negatively. This was the turning-point in the judicial 
treatment of the case. The public prosecutor declared, that it was 
a great proof of the wisdom of the legislator that he had not made any 
mention of a mole in § 181, and that consequently no exception was 
made in favour of mole pregnancies, since otherwise, this exception 
might have been brought to bear in the case of every charge of 
procuring abortion, and the accusation thereby made void; and this 
all the more, that as the corpus delicti could seldom or never be 
examined, this possibility might be made good in many, if not in 
most cases. The advocate for the defence, on the other hand, 
addressed the jury very impressively to the eflfect, that the legislator 
had made no mention of a mole, because it was no " foetus," which 
'^ could afterwards become a man,'' and that, consequently, § 181 did 
not apply in this case, since the procuring the abortion of a mole 
was not the crime mentioned in this section, which speaks only of 
the abortion of a foetus, etc. ! The result of this deduction was the 
remarkable verdict ''not guilty !" 

The term '^ new-bom child" has also quite as much engaged the 
attention of the penal lawyer and legislator, and it may become the 
subject .of a medical interpretation, of which Case CCCXXXIV. 
affords an example. The Bavarian penal code of 1813, art. 242, 
and that of Oldenburg, art. 169, call a child new-born when it is not 
yet three days old. On the other hand, according to the Wiirtem- 
berg penal regulations of 1839, art. 9, according to the penal codes 
of Saxony and its duchies, and of Brunswick, a child is only new-bom 
so long as it is not more than twenty-four hours old. The renowned 
criminal jurists Tittman and Sttibel, in their outline of a penal code 
for Saxony, also limit the term new-bom to the first twenty-four 



8 § 77. SIGNS OF RECENT BIRTH. 

hours, whilst the Saxon outline of 1812 limits it to the first few 
hours after birth only. Gans (on Infanticide, Hannover, 1824) gives 
the outline of a statute, in which Art. 8, states " it was new-bom so 
long as it was neither fed nor clad, while the mother still laboured 
under the immediate consequences of the delivery, and while no one 
besides herself, her parents, and its father, knew of its birth'' (!), — 
a singular definition, which has, however, been adopted by Werner in 
his handbook of Penal Law. 

The new Prussian penal code has incontestably got cleverly out of 
the diflBlculty when it calls a child new-born only iniplicite " during 
or immediately after its birth/' (The Austrian penal code says, " At 
its birth"); * the very relative term " immediately after" truly per- 
mits of further discussion. For the determination of the punishment 
it may be of the greatest importance to decide whether the child has 
been killed " immediately," or not for some time after its birth, and 
the medical jurist will of course have to decide at what stage of its 
short life the child has met its death. Uninfluenced by the various 
opinions of jurists and legislators above alluded to, he has to take 
the facts on which to base his opinion from the observation of 
nature alone. 

§ 77. Signs of Recent Birth. 

These signs are partly positive, partly negative, and are as 
follow : — 

1. The skin, — ^When the cuticular surface of the child is no longer 
stained with blood, then the child can be no longer regarded as newly- 
born, since the mother is not in a situation " immediately after the 
birth" of a child to be able thoroughly to wash and cleanse it, since 
that requires deliberation, strength, rest, leisure, and apparatus. Of 
course it is here presupposed, that no one else has undertaken the 
duty of cleansing the child, a supposition which befits the greater 
number of all the cases occurring in practice, which are mostly cases 
of children bom in secrecy and solitude, which appear unwashed upon 
the dissecting-table. This criterion has rightly been highly esti- 
mated from the earliest times,t as bearing reference to the state of 

♦ The Penal Code of Tuscany, art. 316, says : — " at the time of the birth 
or shortly thereafter;*' that of Parma, art. 308; — "just born" {nato di 
fresco) ; that of Sardinia, art 571, speaks shortly of a "new-born" child 
(un infante di recente nato). 

f Lex 2. Cod, de patribus, etc. (IV. 43). Si quia propter nimiam pauper- 



§ 77. SIGNS OF RECENT BIRTH. 9 

mind of the mother at the time of the possible infanticide. If she 
have been so far recruited and rested after her confinement as to have 
been able carefully to cleanse her child, and if she have then mur- 
dered it, then her state of mind can no longer be supposed by an 
equitable Judge (or jury) to be the same as that of a woman in 
labour, and as such reckoned in her favour. The same thing is so 
far true, with limitations, of the total absence of the vemix caseosa, 
particularly from the groins and furrows along the spinal column, as 
this cuticular secretion is at least of very frequent occurrence in new- 
bom children. We may remark, however, that these criteria are in 
many cases lost to observation, particularly in all wholly putrefied 
bodies, or in the case of such children as have been thrown dead or 
alive into water or other fluids (cesspools, &c.), and been washed 
therein. So also the dark-red and subsequent icteric coloration of 
the skin of new-born children ceases to be observed from the spread 
of the ordinary cadaveric hue, and still more of course from those of 
putrescence. 

2. Umbilicus and imMlical cord, — ^We shall have to resume the 
consideration of both of these, when we come to consider the signs 
of live-birth (§ 99) ; it is self-evident that when the umbilical cord 
has come away, and the umbilicus is cicatrized — ^the cord not as it were 
torn out of the navel — ^then the child can no longer be regarded as a 
new-bom one. Not, however, the reverse. The changes which take 
place in the umbilical cord, and in the umbilicus itself, the mummifi- 
cation or putrefaction of the cord, with the appearance of a shght 
inflammatory swelling of the abdominal coverings at its root, with 
superflcial ulceration, or also, when the child has been bom alive, 
the contraction of the umbilical arteries, do not occur '^ immediately 
after'' the birth. The latter, the contraction of the umbilical 
arteries in living children occurs indeed, but not sooner than after 
eight or ten hours; the mummification after two, three, or even four 
days, and the putrefaction, under conditions which are in general but 
little favourable to it, is not observable till after the lapse of a much 
longer time. 

3. The stomach. — In a new-born child, whether bom dead or 
alive, and that has in the latter case died " immediately after " its 
birth, the stomach is empty, or, more correctly speaking, it contains a 

taterriy etc.,JlUum,filiamve sanguinolentos, vendiderit^ etc, (evidently meaning 
children jast bom— new-born !). Juvenal also, Sat, VIL, speaks of a new- 
bom child a matre rubentem. 



10 I 77. SIGNS OF RECENT BIRTH. 

trifling quantity^ as mucli as would be taken up on the point of a 
knife or half a small teaspoonfol^ of quite white^ transparent^ seldom 
somewhat bloody, inodorous mucus, which is very tough, but is 
easily removed from the mucous membrane by the handle of a knife. 
In an advanced stage of putrescence this is frequently found full of 
large air-bubbles. By no means infrequently, there is also found in 
the stomach a small quantity of colourless fluid, which must be 
acknowledged as liqtuyr amnii, since the fact, that the foetus m ovo 
does make movements of deglutition and actually swallows, cannot be 
doubted (p. 243, Vol. II.). The mere emptiness of the stomach 
forms indeed no irrefragable proof of the" child having died imme- 
diately after its birth, because it may possibly have been starved to 
death, and may yet have lived for one or two days. But vice versd, 
when milk has been found in the child's stomach, and it is clearly 
ascertained that no one but the mother has given it, then the child 
can no longer be regarded as new-born, since the lonely and help- 
less mother would not be in a condition to give the child nourish- 
ment '^ immediately after ^' its birth, even if she did intend to bring 
it up. All that we have said on this head sub 1 . is also applicable 
here. 

4. The Lungs. — ^We do not require to state, that when the doci- 
masia pulmonaris. proves that the child has not breathed, it must 
then be looked upon as new-bom. The same is the case when the 
examination of the body reveals that the child's Kfe has been but of 
short duration. 

In those countries where the legal period of recent birth is ex- 
tended by statute till three days after the actual birth, the following 
signs will have to be added to those abeady reckoned. 

5. In the large mtestmes meconium is still to be found, in its 
usual well-known form, two, three, or even four days after the birth. 

6. Actiml contraction of the umbilical arteries, which indeed has 
advanced so far during the flrst three days of the child's life, that the 
vessels only with difficulty permit the passage of a very fine sound. 

7. The possession by the centre of ossification of the femoral epi- 
physis of a diameter of more than three hues. We shall treat of this 
diagnostic mark more in detail iu §§ 80 and 97. Attention must 
be paid to this, and it must be used as assistant proof in every case 
in which it is desirable to ascertain — whether the child is (has lived 
for) " three days old ? '* On the other hand, 

8. It is not to be deduced from the presence of the remains of the 



§ 77. SIGNS OF RECENT BIRTH. 11 

umbilical cord that the child has only lived three days, since, as every- 
one knows, these remains do not drop off at the end of seventy-two 
hours, but always later,. on the fifth or sixth day. And the same 
may be said still more strongly — 

9. Of the persistent perviousness of the ductus Botalli, the fora- 
men ovale, and the ductus venosus Arawtii. The state of these pas- 
sages^^ the foetal circulation is of no value in medico-legal practice 
generally (§ 100.), and cannot be used to answer the question : has 
this child lived (only) three days ? since they are always open and 
pervious to the end of this time, and sometimes for much longer.* 

Case CCCXXXIV. — Judicial Question : Has this Child been 

NBWLY-BORN ? FaLL OP THE ChILD AT ITS BlBTH ? DROWNING 

IN Human Oeduue. 

A new-bom child was found in a cesspool on the 18th of October, 
and since there was also a cranial injury visible, we had to make a 
medico-l^al examination of the body next day. The body was that of 
a male child, nineteen inches and a-half long, and about seven potmds 
(imp.) in weight. The tongue was not swollen and lay behind the 
jaws. The body was still quite fresh and had the usual corpse- 
colour. On its back there were much vemix caseosa, and the whole 
body was soiled with human ordure (out of the cesspool). The 
transverse diameter of the head was three inches and a-half, the lon- 
gitudinal one four inches and a-half, the diagonal one five inches, 
the diameter of the shoulders was four inches and a-half, the trans- 
verse diameter of the chest was three inches and a-half, from back to 
front it was three inches and a-quarter, and the diameter of the hips 
was three inches and a-half. There was no down upon the skin, the 
nails and cartilages were tolerably firm, and both testicles were to be 
felt in the scrotum. The part of the umbilical cord still attached was 
half-an-inch long, and had irregular, jagged edges. The diaphragm 
stood between the fiffch and sixth ribs ; the stomach contained a lit- 
tle transparent, inodorous mucus ; neither the liver nor the kidneys 

* The more exact times of their gradual and ultimately complete closure 
have been determined hy the very numerous and careful investigations of 
Billard, and particularly of Elsasser, and to these we refer. Vide Unter- 
suchungen liber die Yeranderungen im Korper der Neugebomen, u. s. w. 
Stuttgart, 1853, s. 64, &o. ; and also Faber, Anleitung zur geriohtsarztlichen 
Unters. neugeb. Kinder, u. s. w. Stuttgart, 1855, s. 102, &o. 



12 5 77, SIGNS OF RECENT BIRTH. 

were remarkably full of blood; there was a large quantity of meco- 
niam; the urinary bladder was empty, the vena cava ascendens was 
tolerably congested. The lungs and heart weighed about three 
ounces (imp.), the lungs by themselves about one ounce and three- 
quarters (imp.), their colour was of a bright cinnabar-red, marbled 
with blue. They floated perfectly, both as a whole and in separate 
pieces ; on incising them crepitation was heard, bloody froth escaped, 
and pearl-like air-bubbles were very distinctly seen to ascend from 
them. The trachea and oesophagus were empty, and perfectly nor- 
mal. The coronary vessels and the cavities of the heart were almost 
empty. On the posterior half of the uninjured scalp there was an 
isolated blood coagulum one line thick; the skull bones at the vertex 
were unusually thin. Precisely on the vertex there was seen on re- 
moving the dura mater a faintly semicircular, ecchymosed stripe, 
running transversely, the result of a fracture, which was indeed par- 
tially distinctly fissured, and at these points had jagged edges. The 
vascular meninges were distended with dark blood, and over the whole 
brain there was effused a layer half a line thick of similar thickish, 
half-coagulated blood. The brain itself was already so pultaceous, 
that it could not be any further examined. The basis cranii was un- 
injured and the sinuses were much congested. In accordance with 
these appearances we could not hesitate to assume : — 1. That the 
child had been mature and viable. 2. That it had lived during and 
after its birth. 8. That it had died from haemorrhage on the brain; and 
4. That the cranial injury discovered must be regarded as the cause 
of this haemorrhage. In regard to the probable origin of this injury 
we did not fed warranted in saying more than — "5. That the sup- 
position that this injury had been produced by the fall of the child at 
its birth upon a hard floor was not improbable ;^^ that, however, also, 
6. "The possibility of this injury having been produced by violence 
otherwise inflicted could not be denied, though this supposition was 
much less probable than the former ;'^ and this opinion we were in- 
duced to form by the absence of any considerable external injury 
upon the head {Fide § 114). In the first place, the Judge was 
anxious to know : 7. If the child was yet alive when it fell into the 
cesspool? We denied this, because the cranial injury, which dis- 
played signs of vital reaction, could not have arisen by falling into 
the soft mass of ordure, and because there was no signs of death from 
suffocation (or drowning) present, not even the smallest particle of 
ordure in the trachea or stomach. The Judge next inquired if the 



S 78. IMMATURE, VIABLE, AND MATURE CHILD. 13 

child were new-horn ? Since, according to the penal code, a child is 
only to be reckoned as such when it has died during or immediately 
after its birth : consequently if this child had lived for a longer time, 
it could no longer be reckoned as new-bom, and the more lenient 
punishment of infanticide could no longer be applied in favour of the ac- 
cused. We decided (for the reasons given in the foregoing §), 8. '^That 
the child was to be regarded as newly-born, and that aftci the receipt 
of the cranial injury it must have died in a very short period; that, 
however, if the cranial injury had not been received during the birth 
itself, but had been subsequently inflicted, then the child might per- 
haps have lived one day before the receipt of the injury.'^ (It was 
not likely to have lived two or more days, as the state of the stomaeh 
proved it must have done, wholly without nourishment ; in the case 
also of its having continued to live for more than two days, the small 
residue of the umbilical cord, which was quite fresh, would already 
have displayed the commencement of mummification). Finally, we 
were asked in this case also, as in so many other similar ones, how long 
a time had probably elapsed since the child was bom ? and judging 
from the great freshness of the body, though it had lain in moist and 
warm human ordure, we stated : 9. ''That the child had been bom 
three or four days previously .'* The mother was never discovered and 
the case was therefore not further pursued. 

§ 78. Immatuee, Viable, and Matuee Child. 

The Pmssian penal code, as we have already shown (§ 76), 
recognises only '' foetus ^' and " child,^' but no other subdivisions of 
embryonic life. The word "abortus" or any German word correspond- 
ing to it, and the word ''viable,'' never occur throughout the whole 
penal code. The medico-legal practitioner must not, however, delete 
these words from his terminology. For, besides that these designa- 
tions have a practical significance in civil cases, complications may 
also arise in penal cases, which may necessitate the Judge to inquire 
of the physician regarding the age (degree of maturity) of the child; 
for instance, when a woimn accused of having murdered a certain 
child which appears to be mature and viable, and is supposed to have 
been borne by her, denies the latter, and consequently the whole in- 
dictment, confessing however, what she cannot deny, that she has 
borne a child, but asserting that it was immature, and it now re- 
mains to be seen whether the medico-legal examination of the mother 



14 § 78. IMMATURE, VIABLE, AND MATURE CHILD. 

and cAild supports her statement ( Fide Case COCXXXV) . Further, 
it cannot be denied that the answer to the question whether a child 
has lived after its birth or no, always more or less depends upon that 
to the question, whether it has been capable of living. Finally, it has 
already been stated (Gen. Div. § 2. p. 4, vol. I.) that our Eoyal 
Ober-Tribunal in interpreting § 186 of the penal code, respecting 
the secret disposal of the body of an illegitimate child by its mother, 
has laid down the principle that a non-viable foetus is not to be re- 
garded as a dead body. Both now, as previously, therefore, the term 
viability continues to possess an important practical significance. 

This is not so much the case with the terms abortus and imma- 
ture foetus, or indeed, with the "premature'' children of many 
schools. The tendency of the legislature is to justify the considera- 
tion of the first two of these t^ms as identical, since the statutory 
regulations in regard to the crime of producing abortion speak only 
of the "foetus'' (Penal code, §§181, 182), without giving the 
slightest definition of its uterine age, or placing any importance upon 
the different stages of the embryo. A new-bom child is, therefore, 
either immature in whatever month it may have been born, or ma- 
ture (full-grown, "perfect," "folly developed," according to the old 
judicial terminology). A mature child, when it is bom without any 
malformation which would make it absolutely impossible for it to 
continue to live, for instance, with diaphragmatic hemia and prolapse 
of the abdominal organs into the thorax, with ectopise, complete spina 
bifida^ &c., is at the same time viable.* But the viability of the 
human foetus commences before its maturity, and the question is, 
what is the terminus a quo viabiUty commences ? In regard to this, 
physicians and legislators have from the earliest times diverged from 
each other, and have laid down the most opposite opinions.f I have 
already pointed out (p. 10, Vol. I.), that these differences of opinion 
are of no practical importance wherever the law of the land has ex- 
pressed itself categorically as to the time when viability shall com- 
mence. In this case, the medical jurist has only to determine, 
whether the child has attained this period, or not? In Prussia, 
consequently (according to the statutoi]| regulations quoted in § 4, 

* Upon the influence of purely foetal diseases, wldch are congenital, upon 
the child's viability, and upon viability generally, vide Gen. Div., § 4, 
p. 7, VoL I. 

t A copious collection of these is to be found in Hubner*s work, die Eiui- 
destodtung m gerichtsarztlicher Besiehung. Erlangen, 1846, s. 38, &o. 



5 79. DEVELOPMENT OF THE EMBRYO. 15 

p. 7, Vol. I.) : — ^whether the child has attained the uterine age of 
one hundred and eighty days at least, or two hundred and ten days 
respectively? — ^this is to be done by a due consideration of the 
stages of development through which the embryo passes in the 
different months.* 



§ 79. Continuation. — ^Thb Development of the Embeyo ac- 
cx)EDiNO to Months. 

About the end of the first month (third or fourth week), the 
embryo is from four to six lines in length. On the cephalic 
extremity the mouth is already recognisable, and the eyes a^^pear as 
two points. The extremities resemble wart-like eminences. The 
heart is recognisable; the liver is disproportionably large. The um- 
bilical vesseb are not yet formed. 

Second month (up to the end of the eighth week). — About the end 
of this period the embryo is from fifteen to eighteen lines long. The 
head is disproportionately large, the nose and lips are abready visible. 
The external ear not yet ; the extremities already project a little from 
the trunk. The anus is marked by a dark point. After the fifth 
week the umbilical vessels commence to form. About the end of 
this period the abdomen is closed in. The rudiments of the external 
parts of generation are visible, but even with a magnifying-glass the 
sex itself can only be distinguished with difficulty, and not certainly. 
All the internal organs may now, however, be recognised. 

Third month (up to the end of the twelfth week). — The embryo is 
from two inches to two inches and a-half long, its weight is about one 
ounce (imp.). The eyelids and the lips meet, so that both the eyes 
and mouth are closed. The fingers are well separated, and their 
nails are already recognisable. The clitoris and penis are very 
prominent, and the sex is recognisable particularly with a mag- 
nifyiBg.glass. The thymus gland and the supra-renal capsules are 
formed. The cerebrum, the cerebellum, and the medulla oblongata, 
as well as the cavities of the heart, are plainly distinguishable. The 

♦ The question of the viability of the child has been for centuries con- 
sidered from the most various points of view, by writers upon criminal law, 
civil law, and even on theology (the Church Fathers). We do not require 
to enter upon these discussions, as the matter does not belong to the forum 
of the medical jurist, as we have already pointed out (Gen. Div., § 4, p. 7 
&c. Vol. I.). 



16 § 79. DEVELOPMENT OF THE EMBRYO. 

humems is three and a-half lines long^ the radios two lines and a- 
half, the ulna three lines, the femur from two to three lines, the tibia 
from two to three lines, and the fibula two lines and a-half. 

About the end of the fourth month (the sixteenth week), the em- 
bryo weighs about two ounces and a-half to three ounces (imp.), and 
is from five to six inches long. The skin is of a very rosy colour, 
and has already a certain amount of consistence. The sex is recog- 
nisable without any magnifying-glass, as also a certain peculiar 
physiognomy of the countenance, in which the very large mouth 
strikes one. The umbilicus is situated near the pubis. There is 
meconium in the large intestines, but it is of a light greyish-white 
colour. The length of the humerus is eight lines, the radius eight 
lines, the ulna eight lines, the femur from four to five lines, the tibia 
from four to five lines. 

At the end of the fifth month (twenty weeks), the embryo is from 
ten to eleven inches long. From this time onwards, the length of 
the foetus gives a means of ascertaining its uterine age approxima- 
tively, which is very easily remembered, for the length (in inches) of 
the foetus (up to maturity) is approximatively exactly double the 
number of the {lunar) months it has attained. The weight now com- 
mences to vary in individuals, and is, therefore (from this month to 
maturity), a less safe guide to the age than the length. The foetus 
at five months weighs from about seven to ten ounces (imp.) . The 
nails are quite distinct. The hair of the head is visible as a light 
down. The head is still disproportionately large ; the Uver, the heart, 
and the kidneys are also out of all proportion hgrge compared with 
the other organs. The meconium now begins to be of a pale greenish- 
yellow colour from the bile, which now begins to be secreted, but it 
is still not nearly so viscous and pitchy as it subsequently becomes. 
The length of the humerus is from thirteen to fifteen lines, of the 
radius twelve lines, of the ulna thirteen lines, of the femur twelve 
lines, and the tibia and fibula the same. 

About the end of the sixth month (twenty-four weeks), the foetus 
measures from twelve to thirteen inches in length, and weighs from 
about one pound and a-half to one pound and three-quarters (imp.). 
The skin is now well covered with down and sebaceous matter. The 
umbilicus is a little further removed from the pubis. The colour of 
the fresh body is a dirty cinnabar-red. The meconium is darker and 
more viscous. The scrotum is empty, the pupillary membrane is 
still present and distinctly visible without a magnifying-glass. The 



§ 79. DEVELOPMENT OF THE EMBRYO. 17 

length of the humerus is sixteen lines, of the radius sixteen lines, of 
the ulna seventeen lines, of the femur seventeen lines, and the tibia 
and fibula the same. 

The foetus of the seventh month (up to the twenty-eighth week) is 
characterized by a length of from fourteen to fifteen inches, and a 
weight of from about three pounds to three pounds and a-half (imp.). 
The hair is plentiful, and about one-quarter of an inch long. The 
large fontanelle is still more than one inch and a-half in longitudinal 
diameter, and all the fontanelles are distinctly to be felt. The skin 
is of a dirty reddish. The dark olive-green viscous meconium fills 
the whole of the large intestine. The liver, still very large, is of a 
deep dark brownish-red. The length of the humerus is from twenty 
to twenty-two lines, of the radius seventeen lines, of the ulna 
eighteen lines, of the femur, tibia, and fibula, each from nineteen to 
twenty-one lines. 

The eighth month is the most important in all the embryonic life in 
a medico-legal point of view, because at the end of the thirtieth 
week (two hundred and ten days) the foetus indubitably, and accord- 
ing to statutory declaration, commences to be viable. About this 
time it is from fifteen to sixteen inches long, and from about three to 
five pounds (imp.) heavy. The chief criteria are a brighter fiesh- 
colour than formerly, the disappearance of the pupillary membrane 
and the descent of the testicles into the scrotum, or at least to the 
abdominal rings. The gaping vulva permits the clitoris to be dis- 
tinctly visible. The nails have almost grown to the ends of the 
fingers. The humerus is from twenty-three to twenty-four lines 
long, the radius from eighteen to nineteen lines long, the ulna 
twenty-two to twenty-three lines, the femur twenty-four lines, and 
the tibia aiid fibula each from twenty-one to twenty-three lines 
long. 

In the ninth month (up to the end of the thirty-sixth week), the 
foetus is from seventeen to eighteen inches long, and already nearly 
six pounds (imp.) heavy. The s^otum begins to be corrugated, and 
the vulva to close. The head is better covered with hair, whilst 
during this month the down begins to disappear. 

During the course and at the end of the tenth month (fortieth 
week), the foetus becomes mature. 



VOL. III. 



18 I 80. SIGNS OF FOETAL MATURITY. 

§ 80. Continuation. — Signs op Matueity op the Farrus. 

A foetus arrived at maturity (come to the full time, perfect, or 
fully developed) is easily recognised during life as well as after 
death. Even a tolerable amount of putrefaction does not disturb the 
diagnosis, which only becomes doubtfnl when considerable destruc- 
tion has been caused by putrescence, bursting of the skull-bones for 
example, or the loss of individual parts of the body, &c. And even the 
bare bones themselves, when exhumed, are still capable of giving the 
requisite amount of certainty on which to base an opinion ; wherefore 
I have already described the dimensions, at least of the bones of the 
extremities, at the various uterine ages of the embryo, and further on 
I shall give those of the more important bones of the skeleton of the 
mature foetus.* 

The fresh body of a mature new-bom child displays at once : 1. 
A certain general Aabitus, which an expert who has seen many such 
bodies is not apt readily to forget. 2. The firm tense skin, which, 
in even a moderately well-nourished child, is no longer wrinkled, but 
well stuffed out, is of the usual pale corpse-colour, and not the dirty 
brown or cinnabar-red of the earlier months. 3. I^ down has 
already disappeared ; though its remains may still be found on the 
shoulders of every mature child, and one must take care not to be there- 
by induced to caH the child immature. 4. The head is certainly more 
or less, but in most cases very distinctly, covered with Aair about 
three-quarters of an inch long. 5. The skuU-bones are not remark- 
ably moveable, the iBige/ontanelle averages from one inch to three- 
quarters of an inch in length. 6. As for tAe weight and length of 
the body; and 7. The diameters of the head, the shoulders, and hips,t 
the Table hereto annexed, containing the results of two hundred and 
forty-seven new investigations, gives the following numerical averages.^ 

* Vide the accurate colleotion of all the known measurements of the foetal 
skeleton, in Eanzler's treatise, quoted at p. 68, Yol. I. 

t The diameters of the chest are des^iibed in the Table given further on 
(in § 85). 

X The first hundred and seventeen cases I have taken from my own 
medico-legal cases, and only from perfectly fresh bodies. The measurements 
and weights of all the other cases have been taken, at my desire, by two of 
the best of my former students, who were subsequently assistant-physicians in 
our two Royal Lying-in Institutions, Prof. Hekker, now at Munich, and Dr. 
Rabe. There is not the slightest reason for doubting the correctness of their 
work. 



5 80. SIGNS OF FGETAL MATURITY. 



19 



Weights and Measurements op Two Hundred and Forty-Seven 
Mature New-born Children.* 













Diameter of 
















Diameter of 






No. 


1 


« 


1 


^ 


Head. 


a 


1- 


No. 


1 


^ 




i 


Head. 


1 


"8 
1" 


1 


3 




1 


1 


1 








Ll». 




















LlM. 


Inches. 












1 


— 


1 


6| 


18 


3i 


4 


5 


4 


3 


36 


— 


I 


61 


19 


3i 


4* 


5 


5 


3 


2 


1 


— 


6* 


19 


3 


4* 


5 


5 


3 


37 




— 


7 


20 


3| 


4J 


5 


5i 


31 


3 


— 


I 


H 


20 


31 


4 


5 


4f 


3 


38 


— 


1 


7» 


194 


3 


41 


5 


41 


3* 


4 


J 


— 


7 


20 


3* 


4 


41 


5 


3 


39 




— 


Sf 


19 


3 


4 


5 


51 


4 


5 


— 


I 


7 


m 


3* 


4 


5 


41 


3 


40 


— 


1 


4 


18 


3 


4 


4* 


41 


3 


6 


— 


1 


7| 


m 


3* 


4 


5 


4f 


3 


41 


— 


1 


7 


20 


3 


41 


5 


5 


31 


7 


i 


— 


6 


19 


3 


4 


4i 


41 


3 


42 




— 


5 


18 


3 


31 


4 


41 


31 


8 


— 


I 


n 


20 


3^ 


4 


5 


5 


3 


43 




— 


10 


20i 


H 


41 


H 


61 


4f 


9 


1|- 


7 


21 


3 


4 


41 


5 


3 


44 


— 


1 


61 


19 


3J 


31 


4i 


41 


31 


10 




1 


6 


18 


3J 


4 


4| 


4| 


21 


45 


— 


1 


6i 


19 


3 


4 


5 


41 


3J 


11 


1 


— 


8 


20 


3i 


4i 


5 


5 


3i 


46 




— 


71 


18 


H 


31 


5 


51 


3* 


12 


— 


I 


6 


m 


3i 


4 


4i 


5 


3 


47 




— 


61 


I9i 


3 


4 


4i 


41 


3J 


13 


1 


— 


7f 


20i 


3i 


4i 


51 


51 


3 


48 


— 


1 


7 


19 


3i 


4 


5 


5 


3| 


14 


1 


— 


8 


19 


3i 


41 


51 


5 


H 


49 




— 


7 


20 


3 


4 


5 


5 


3| 


15 


— 


1 


7 


20 


31 


4 


5 


5 


3i 


50 




— 


71 


20 


3 


4 


4} 


H 


3 


16 


-^ 


1 


6 


18 


3 


4 


41 


41 


2f 


51 


— 


1 


5* 


20 


3 


4* 


41 


4 


2| 


17 


1 


— 


9 


20 


3i 


41 


5 


51 


3i 


52 




— 


6f 


19J 


H 


41 


5i 


5* 


4 


18 


I 


— 


6 


20ii 


3i 


4 


5 


51 


3i 


53 


— 


1 


9 


20i 


3i 


41 


H 


5 


4 


19 


— 


1 


6]^ 


20 


3J 


3} 


41 


41 


3i 


54 






8J 


20 


31 


4 


41 


5 


4f 


20 


1 


-^ 


7 


19 


31 


41 


4f 


41 


3 


55 




— 


8 


20 


31 


41 


4J 


4} 


4 


21 


- 


1 


8J 


20 


31 


41 


5 


51 


3i 


56 




— 


6| 


19J 


3 


41 


5 


5 


31 


22 


1 


— 


8 


20 


3i 


41 


51 


51 


3i 


57 


— 


1 


61 


19 


3 


4 


4J 


4i 


4J 


23 


— 


1 


8 


20 


H 


41 


41 


5 


3i 


58 


— 


1 


5 


18i 


3 


31 


41 


3} 


3 


24 


^ 


1 


5 


19 


3 


3* 


41 


4 


3 


59 


— 


1 


6 


19 


3 


3} 


4| 


41 


3 


25 


— 


1 


H 


20 


31 


4 


4} 


5 


3i 


60 




— 


6 


19J 


H 


41 


41 


5 


4 


26 


. — 


1 


5 


18 


2i 


4 


41 


41 


2*1 


61 


— 


1 


7 


21 


H 


H 


5 


5| 


3* 


27 


1 


^ 


5 


19 


3 


41 


4} 


4f 


2i 


62 




— 


71 


m 


3 


41 


5 


41 


31 


28 


— 


1 


8 


20 


3i 


4i 


5 


51 


3| 


63 


— 


1 


81 


19 


3 


4 


5 


H 


4 


29 


1 


—. 


5i 


18 


31 


41 


5 


41 


2i 


64 






H 


18 


3 


4 


4i 


41 


3 


30 


— 


1 


6i 


I8i 


31 


4 


5 


5 


3* 


65 


— 


1 


7 


20 


3 


41 5 


5 


31 


31 


— 


1 


6 


19 


3 


3i 


41 


4} 


3 


66 




— 


10 


20i 


H 


41 5| 


61 


4f 


32 


— 


1 


7 


19]^ 


34 


4 


5 


5 


3 


67 




— 


7* 


20 


H 


41 5 


51 


3i 


33 


1 


— 


6i 


19 


31 


4 


5 


4J 


3 


68 


— 


1 


71 


18 


3i 


4^ 5 


41 


31 
3| 


34 


1 


H 7 


20 


3: 


41 


5 


5 


3i 


69 


— 


1 


H 


19 


H 


31 


4i 


4} 


35 


1 


-■10 

1 


22 


3J 


5 


6 


6 


3i 


70 


— 


1 


61 


19 


3 


4 


5 


4} 


3J 



* The weights are given in Prussian oommeroial pounds and fractions, 
the measurements in Rhenish inches. Each Prussian, commercial pound 
contains 7217^ grs. imp., 100 lbs. Pr. = 1035 lbs. imp. The Rhenish foot 
contains 12.356 British inches. The differences in the weight and measure- 
ments of a child are not great enough to be of any importance ; but it is 
right to mention that the original figures are adhered to. — Tbansl. 

c2 



20 



i 80. SIGNS OF FCETAL MATURITY. 

Weights and Measurements— Ci>n/mu«rf. 







■— ~ 






Diameter of 
















Dlwnetwrof 
















Head. 


V 














Head. 


■ 




Mo. 


1 


1 


t 


1 




U 

in 


Ko. 


i 

X 


1 


1 


i 




1 . 
t 


"5 


S 


1 


1 


i 


1 


■a 












H 


! 


1 












1 


t 


1 


s 










Lb*. 


Inches. 


















Urn. 


Inche*. 












71 




^ 


7i 


18 


31 


3f 


5 


5f 


31 


115 


— 




51 


181 


3 


31 


41 


41 


3 


72 


t 





6J 


I9f 


3 


4 


4f 


41 


31 


116 


— 




71 


21 


34 


4i 


5 


41 


31 


73 


— 


1 


7 


191 


3-1 


4 


5 


5 


3i| 


117 


1 


— 


9 


21 


3 


44 


51 


5 


4 


74 




— 


7 


20 


3 


4 


5 


5 


3i 


118 


— 




8 


181 


34 


44 


5 


— 


— 


75 




— 


71 


20 


3 


4 


4J 


5i 


3 


119 


1 


— 


71 


18 


34 


4| 


5 


— 


— 


76 





1 


H 


20 


3 


41 


4i 


4 


2i 


120 


— 




7 


18 


34 


H 


41 


— 


— 


77 




— 


6f 


191 


31 


4i 


5i 


54 


4 


121 


— 




7 


18 


34 


4i 


5 


— 


— 


78 


-. 


1 


6i 


181 


3 


3i 


41 


4^ 


3 


122 


— 




8 


19 


34 


1* 


5 


— 


— 


79 




— 


8 


I9J 


3i 


41 


5 


4i 


3 


123 


— 




6 


19 


34 


4i 


4| 


— 


— 


80 





1 


6 


18 


31 


4 


4f 


5 


3 


124 


1 


— 


71 


19 


34 


44 


51 


— 


— 


81 




1 


5 


18 


3 


4 


4i 


H 


2f 


125 


— 




6 


18 


34 


44 


5 


— 


— 


82 




— 


6i 


191 


31 


n 


5 


5 


31 


126 


— 




6 


17 


3i 


4 


4i 


— 


— 


83 




— 


8i 


201 


3J 


4 


4f 


5 


3i 


127 


— 




61 


18 


3i 


4 


4| 


— 


— 


84 


— 


1 


6i 


20 


31 


4 


5* 


H 


4i 


128 


— 




71 


18 


34 


4} 


41 


— 


— 


85 




— 


7 


20 


3 


4 


5 


4i 


3i 


129 


— 




61 


17 


34 


4» 


5 


— 


— 


86 




1 


51 


191 


3^ 


4 


5 


4J 


3 


130 


— 




8 


181 


H 


4i 


5 


— 


— 


87 




— 


6 


20 


3 


4i 


41 


4i 


H 


131 


1 


— 


61 


18 


3? 


41 


n 


— 


— 


88 




— 


6 


191 


3J 


H 


5 


4i 


3 


132 


1 


— 


7f 


19 


3f 


4J 


51 


— 


— 


89 




— 


61 


20 


3 


H 


5 


H 


3 


133 


1 


— 


64 


17 


3j 


44 


51 


— 


— 


90 




— 


61 


18 


3 


4 


4J 


4i 


3i 


134 


1 


— 


7 


18 


34 


41 


5 


— 


— 


91 




— 


7f 


20 


3i 


4 


5i 


4J 


3i 


135 


1 


— 


81 


18 


31 


H 


51 


— 


— 


92 


— 


1 


H 


21 


3i 


41 


5i 


41 


4 


136 


1 


— 


H 


18 


3* 


41 


4! 


— 


— 


93 




— 


7 


191 


31 


H 


5 


5 


4i 


137 


1 


— 


61 


171 


3i 


41 


41 


— 


— 


94 




— 


8 


21 


3i 


41 


5 


H 


31 


138 


1 


— 


7 


18 


34 


4» 


5 


— 


— 


95 




— 


6 


171 


2f 


4 


5 


H 


3 


139 


— 


1 


9 


20 


34 


44 


5 


— 


— 


96 




___ 


6 


19 


3i 


3i 


4i 


5 


3i 


140 


1 


— 


7 


18 


3| 


41 


4f 


— 


— 


97 




— 


7 


2Q 


3 


4 


41 


5 


3i 


141 


— 


1 


6 


16 


3J 


4 


4} 


— 


— 


98 


— 


1 


5i 


20 


31 


4 


5 


4i 


H 


142 


1 


— 


91 


20 


3i 


44 


51 


— 


— 


99 





1 


7 


19i 


3 


4 


4i 


5 


3J 


143 


1 


— 


7 


19 


34 


41 


41 


— 


— 


100 


1 





7 


19 


3 


4 


5 


5 


4i 


144 


— 


1 


7 


171 


34 


41 


5 


— 


— 


101 





1 


7 


20i 


3i 


41 


5 


4 


3i 


145 


1 


— 


71 


18 


3i 


44 


51 


— 


— 


102 





1 


71 


20 


31 


45 


5 


5i 


4 


146 


1 


— 


8 


191 


3| 


44 


51 


— 


— 


103 


— 


1 


51 


19 


3J 


4j 


4i 


44 


3i 


147 


1 


— 


7J 


19 


3J 


4i 


5 


— 


— 


104 





1 


61 


20 


3i 


4 


4| 


44 


3! 


148 


— 


1 


7 


18 


34 


4i 


51 


— 


— 


105 


1 





7 


191 


3J 


41 


5 


5 


3| 


149 


1 


— 


7 


18 


34 


41 


5 


— 


— 


106 





1 


61 


191 


31 


41 


5 


4i 


3 


150 


1 


— 


6 


18 


3i 


4 


4f 


— 


— 


107 


1 





6 


20 


3i 


4 


4f 


4i 


3 


151 


— 


1 


71 


18 


3f 


44 


4} 


— 


— 


108 


1 


— 


7J 


20 


31 


41 


4i 


44 


31 


152 


1 


— 


101 


20 


3^ 


44 


5| 


— 


— 


109 





1 


7 


20i 


3 


H 


5 


4| 


3f 


153 


— 


1 


8 


19 


3* 


41 


5 


— 


— • 


110 


— 


1 


81 


21 


31 


41 


5 


5 


41 


154 


— 


1 


71 


19 


34 


44 


51 


— 


— 


111 


— 


1 


7 


21 


3 


4i 


5 


^ 


31 


155 


— 


1 


7k 


18 


3i 


4i 


5 


— 


— 


112 


1 


— 


71 


20 


3 


4 


5 


5 


3i 


156 


— 


1 


6f 


18 


3| 


41 


5 


— 


— 


113 





1 


5f 


17 


3 


4 


4f 


34 


3 


157 


1 


— 


8 


18 


3| 


4 


5 


— 


— - 


114 


1 


— 


7 


201 


H 


4 


5 


44 


31 


158 


1 


~~ 


71 


19 


34 


4 


51 


~ 


""" 



§ 80. SIGNS OF FGETAL MATURITY. 



21 



Weights and Measurements— Cow^mwee?. 



I 








Diameter of 








i 






Diameter of 
















Head. 


. 














Head. 


i 




No. 


i 


^ 


1 


^ 




i 




No. 


i 


^ 


1 


1 






1 


! 


■i 


1 


-a 


1 






Lbs. 


Inches. 














LIM. 


Inches. 












159 


— 


1 


7i 


18 


3i 


44 


5 


— 


— 


204 


1 


— 


8 


18 


3i 


H 


5 


— 


— 


160 


1 


— 


6i 


17 


3i 


4 


41 


— 


— 


205 


1 


— 


61 


18 


31 


n 


5 


— 


— 


161 


— 


1 


H 


17 


3i 


4 


4J 


— 


— 


206 


1 


— 


71 


19 


3i 


4J 


5 


— 


— 


162 


1 


— 


H 


17 


3i 


4 


4| 


— 


— 


207 


1 


— 


7 


19 


3i 


4 


4f 


— 


— 


163 


— 


1 


8 


19 


3i 


41 


51 


— 


— 


208 


— 


1 


6 


17f 


— 


— 




— 


— 


164 


1 


— 


8 


19 


3i 


41 


51 


— 


— 


209 


— 


1 


6| 


18 


— 


— 


— 


— 


— 


165 


— 


1 


6i 


18 


3i 


4* 


6 


— 


— 


210 


1 


— 


61 


18i 


— 


— 


— 


— 


— 


166 


1 


— 


7 


18 


31 


41 


5 


— 


— 


211 


1 


— 


41 


18 


— 


— 


— 


— 


— 


167 


— 


1 


7 


17 


3i 


4* 


5 


— 


■ — 


212 


— 


1 


71 


18i 


— 


— 


— 


— 


— 


168 


1 


— 


8 


19 


3i 


4f 


41 


— 


— 


213 


1 


— 


61 


m 


— 


— 


— 


— 


— 


169 





1 


6i 


18 


3i 


41 


4f 


— 


— 


214 


— 


1 


6J 


m 


q — 


T- 


— 


— 


^ — 


170 





1 


8 


1st 


31 


41 


5 


— 


— 


215* 


— 


1 


8 


m 


"■^ 


- — 


— 


— 


— 


171 





1 


8^« 


:i8 


■3J 


41 


41 


— 


■ — 


216- 


1 


— 


71 


I8i 


— 





— 


-— 


■ — 


172 


1 


— 


H 


19 


31 


4J 


5 


— 


^ 


217. 


1 




74 


19 


— 


— 


— 


_— 


— 


173 





1 


6 


17 


3 


3f 


41 


— 


— 


218' 


1 


'' — 


7 


m 


— 





— 


— 


— 


174 


1 


— 


7 


18 


3i 


41 


4* 


— 


- — 


219* 


1 


— 


61 


m 


— '- 


1-L 


— 


— 


— 


175 


1 





9 


19 


31 


41 


5 


— 


. — 


220- 


1 


— 


61 


IS-r 


■ — 


*-.- 


, — 


— 


— 


176 


1 


— 


8 


17 


31 


41 


4* 


— 


— 


221 


1 


— 


8 


20 


— 


-:r 


— 


— 


— 


177 





1 


5f 


16 


3| 


4 


4f 


— 


' — 


222* 


— 


1 


6 


18 


— 


^ 


— 


— 


— 


178 


— 


1 


6f 


m 


31 


4 


4* 


— 


. — 


223* 


1 


— 


•7 


19 


i;- 


^ 


— 


— 


— 


179 


1 





8 


19 


31 


41 


5 


— 


— ^ 


224 


1 


— 


.71 


19 , 

So 


' — -' 


— 


— 


— 


— 


180 


1 


— 


6i 


17i 


31 


41 


5 


— 


— 


225' 


1 


—- 


3: 


— 


— 


— 


— 


— 


181 





1 


7 


18 


3| 


41 


4J 


— 


— 


226? 


i 


■-^ 


.Vl8. 


— 


— 


— 


— 


— 


182 


1 





7 


19 


31 


41 


5 


— 


— 


227 


1 


— 


71 


I8i 


— 


— 


— 


— 


— 


183 


1 





8 


17 


3i 


41 


5 


— 


'-^ 


228* 


1 


— 


71 


19 


— 


, — 


— , 


— 


— 


184 


1 





7 


17 


3i 


4i. 


51 


— 


-—' 


229 


1 


— 


9f 


20 ^* 


^ — 


v» 


— 





— 


185 





1 


6 


17 


31 


41 


5 


— 


— ;- 


230 


1 


— 


7f 


19n; 


— : 


-*- 


— 


— 


— 


186 





1 


5 


19 


31 


4 


4f 


—1 


-^ 


231 


1 


— 


7 


18 


— 


— 


— 


— 


— 


187 





1 


7 


19 


31 


41 


51 


— 


— 


232 


— 


1 


7 


18| 


— 


— 


— 


— 


— 


188 





1 


6 


17 


31 


4 


n 


— 





233 


— 


1 


61 


18 


— 


— 


— 


— 


— 


189 


1 





6 


17 


31 


41 


4f 


— 





234 


— 


1 


61 


in 


— 


— 


— 


— 


— 


190 





1 


7 


19 


31 


41 


5 


— 





235 


— 


1 


9 


19 


— 


— 


— 


— 


— 


191 


1 





8 


19 


31 


41 


5 


— 


^ — 


236 


1 


— 


5f 


18 


— 


— 


— 


— 


— 


192 


1 





6i 


m 


31 


4 


4i 


— 





237 


1 


— 


81 


19i 


— 


— 


— 


— 


— 


193 


1 





6 


17 


3i 


4} 


41 


— 


— 


238 


— 


1 


61 


18 


— 


— 


— 


— 


— 


194 


1 





8 


19 


31 


4 


5 


— 





239 


^__ 


1 


61 


19 


_.. 


— 


— 


— 


— 


195 


1 





5 


16 


31 


4 


4f 


— 





240 


— 


1 


61 


m 


— 


— 


— 


— 


— 


196 





1 


6i 


18 


3i 


4 


n 


— 





241 


— 


1 


8 


m 


— 


— 


— 


— 


— 


197 





1 


6 


17 


3* 


41 


4i 


— 





242 


1 


— 


91 


20 


— 


— 


— 


— 


— 


198 





1 


7 


17 


31 


41 


4| 


— 





243 


1 


— 


61 


18i 


— 


— 


— 


— 


— 


199 





I 


8 


19 


31 


41 


5 


— 





244 


— 


1 


6 


18 


— 


— 


— 


— 


— 


200 


1 





7 


18 


31 


41 


5 


— 





245 


— 


1 


61 


18 


— 


— 


— 


— 


— 


201 


___ 


1 


6f 


18 


31 


41 


4f 


— 





246 


1 


— 


74 


m 


— 


— 


— 


— 


— 


202 


1 


— 


8 


18 


31 


41 


5 


— 





247 


— 


1 


8| 


19 


-- 


— 


— 


— 


— 


203 


1 


— 


9 


20 


31 


41 


51 


— 


"""" 




130 


117 

















22 



S 80. SIGNS OF FCETAL MATURITY. 



In 247 mature chfldren tke average length of the body in both sexes 
was . - - - 18} inches 

The average length of 130 male children 

was ... - 19J „ 

The average length of 117 female chil- 
dren was ... 18| „ 

In 247 matore children the average weight of both sexes 



was - 


- 


- 


7Albs. 


The average weight of 130 male children 




was - 


- 


- 


7i „ 


The average weight of 117 female chil- 




dren was 


- 


- 


6J „ 


The maximum length attamed 


was 






in one boy 


- 


- 


22 inches 


in 38 boys 


- 


- 


20 „ and upwards 


in 4 girls 


- 


- 


21 „ 


in 23 girls 


- 


- 


20 „ and upwards 


The minimum length attained 


was 






in one boy 


- 


- 


16 inches 


in 8 boys 


- 


- 


17 „ 


in 4 boys 


- 


- 


17i „ 


in 2 girls 


- 


- 


16 „ 


in 13 girls 


- 


17 to 17 „ 


The maximum weight attamed 


was 






in 4 boys 


- 


. 


10 lbs. 


in 7 boys 


- 


9 to 10 „ 


in 26 boys 


- 


8„ 


9 « 


in 8 girls 


- 


9« 


10 „ 


in 16 girls 


- 


8„ 


9 „ 


The minimum weight attained 


was 






in one boy 


- 


- 


4ilbs. 


in 7 boys 


- 


under 


6 „ 


in 14 girls 


- 


» 


6 « 


In 207 mature children the average diameter of the head was 


Transversely - 


- 


- 


Sj inches 


Longitudinally 


- 


- 


4i „ 


Diagonally 


- 


- 


4J „ 


The average diameter across 


the shoulders in 117 mature children 


was 4tt inches. 









§ 80. SIGNS OF FCETAL MATURITY. 23 

The average diameter across the hips in 117 mature children was 
3^ inches. 

8. The naih in mature children feel homy, and not like skin, as 
in the ^ earlier months, they reach the tips of the fingers, but never 
those of the toes. 

9. The cartilages of the ears and nose feel tolerably like cartilage, 
and not like mere folds of skin, as previously. The most infalUble 
proof, however, of an already advanced condition of ossification is 
to be found in the presence of — 

10. The centre of ossification of the inferior femoral epiphysis, and for 
this, one of the most valuable practical discoveries in forensic medicine, 
we have to thank Beclard* chiefly, and also the researches of Ollivierf 
and Mildner.J While in the tenth (lunar) month of foetal life, not 
one of the epiphyses of the long bones has as yet commenced to 
ossify; in the second half of this month the centre of ossification of 
the inferior femoral epiphysis commences to form. The easiest way 
to find it is to proceed as follows : — a horizontal incision is to be made 
through the skin and superficial tissues over the knee-joint down to the 
cartilages, the patella is then to be removed, and the end of the femur 
made to protrude through the incision. Thin horizontal sections are 
then to be removed from the cartilaginous epiphysis, at first more 
boldly, but so soon as a coloured point is observed in the last section, 
then very carefully, layer by layer, till the greatest diameter of the 
osseous nucleus is attained. This appear^ to the naked eye as a 
more or less circular bright blood-red spot in the midst of the milk- 
white cartilage, in which vascular convolutions can be distinctly 
recognised. Figure 24, Plate VIII., gives an unusually correct re- 
presentation of such an osseous nucleus, which no one can ever 
mistake, if they have once seen it. My own investigations into the 
development of this osseous nucleus, which I have to this end 
extended over children that have lived some time, comprise as yet but 
one hundred and twenty-five cases, and are included in the following 
Table. 

* Nouveau Joum. de Med. Chir. et Pharm. Paris, 1819, Tom. iv. 
p. 107, &o. 

f Annales d'Hygi^ne publique, Tom. xxvii. p. 342. 

X Prager Vierteljahrsschrift Prag., 1850. Bd. xxviii s. 39, &o. 



24 



5 80. SIGNS OF FCETAL MATURITY. 



Measurements op the Centre op Ossification in One Hundred 

AND TWENTT-PIVE NeW-BORN AND YOUNO CHILDREN.* 



Age. 


No. 


Length. 


Wgt. 


Diameter of Heftd. 


'S 


Sex. 


RemarkB. 














TnuM- 


^- 


"isr 










Inches. 1 Lta. 


Inch. 


Inch. 


Inch. 


Unee 
























/Partly stQlbom, partly dead, 
\ shortly after birth. ( Vide 2ud 
) (German) edition of this work, 




23 


— 


— 


— 


— 


— 





Var. 




















\ p. 693.) 


In the 


1 


15 


— 


— 


— 








M. 


Stillborn. 


seventh 


1 


17J 





— 


— 


— 





M. 


Putrid when born. 


and 


1 


15 


— 


— 


— 


— 





F. 


Putrid when born. 


eighth 


1 


16 


4 


21 


31 


4 





M. 


Drowned in a cesspool. 


solar 


1 


15i 


— 






— 





M. 


Stillborn. 


month. 


1 


14 













F. 


( Stillborn ; had lain in the water 
( for six weeks. 




"~~ 


~~" 


~~" 


~"~ 




1 


14J 








— 


— 





M. 


Stillborn. 




1 


131 













F. 


( Taken put of the uterus of the 
( drowned mother. 


\ 










f 


1 

1 


— 


— 


— 


— 


— 



2 


F. 


Killed by cutting its throat. 
Taken putrid out of the water. 




1 


S 


4 


— 


' — 


— 


If 


M. 




In the 

ninth 

solar 

month. 


1 


17f 





_« 


— 


,_1- 


01 


F. 


Stillborn. 


1 


17^^ 


51 


3 


3f 


4 


2 


M. 


Stillborn. 


1 


X7i 


5 


— 




— ■ 


2 


M. 


Stillborn. 


1 


17i 


6 


2f 


^4 


5 


2 


M. 


( Stillborn ; found sewed up in a 
1 towel. 




1 


17 


4i 


V 


4 


4i 





— 


J Found in the water with a frac- 
( tured skull. 


\ 


, 1 


18 


5 


3 


4 


n 


0! 


F. 


Stillborn. 


1 


n 


~. 


— 


— -' 


t 


— 


2 
21 
3 
4 


Var. 


\ Three of these stillborn, four 


















f killed by suflfocation, and two 




I* 












M 


I by cranial injuries. ( Vide 2nd 




1 


20 


61 


.^ 








3 


m! 


J ((ierman) edition, p. 693.) 




1 


19i 


7 


— 


— 


— 


1| 


M. 


Stillborn. 


Perfectly 


1 


19 


— 


3i 


4 


n 


U 


F. 


Stillborn. 


mature. 


1 


m 


7 


3i 


n 


5 


3 


— 


Found putrid in a ditch. 




1 


19 


6 


3J 


31 


41 


11 


M. 


Stillborn. 
[ Found putrid ; killed by cranial 




1 


20 


H 


3i 


4 


5 


21 


M. 


< injuries (ossification defec- 
( tive). 




1 


191 


7 


3 


4 


4J 


2 


F. 


Stillborn. 




1 


19 


7 


3 


4 


5 


If 


M. 


Suffocated. 


\ 


1 


20i 


7 


3i 


4i 


5 


3 


F. 


Killed by a fall at birth. 



- * Original weights and measurements retained as in former Table, p. 19, 
Vol. III. 



§ 80. SIGNS OF FGETAL MATURITY. 



25 



M EASUREMEKTS — Continued, 



Age. 


xi 


Len(^. 


Wgt. 


Diameter of Head. 


o» 


£ex. 


Benurks. 


1 












Trans- 


"sx- 


»jr- 










Inches. 


Lb*. 


Incli. 


Inch. 


Inch. 


lines 










20 


61 


— 


-— 


— 


3 


F. 


Stillborn. 


1 




20 


71 


3i 


,4i 


5 


n 


^ F. 


Died of cardiac apoplexy. 
Drowned; putrid. 
Suffocated in a cesspool. 




18 








— 


1 


M. 






19 


51 


3i 


H 


4? 


1 


F. 






20 


61 


3i 


4 


4! 


2J 


F. 


( Cranial injuries (defective ossifi- 
( cation. 






19i 


7 











U 


M. 


Putrefied. 






191 


6 


3i 


4i 


5 


If 


F. 


( Drowned in a cesspool (ossifica- 
( tion defective). 






21 


7 


3 


4i 


5 


3 


F. 


Died from apoplexy. 






20 


61 


3 


H 


5 


2J 


F. 








21 




— 





— 


21 


F. 








19i 


51 


3* 


41 


5 


2i 


F. 


Drowned in a chamberpot 






20 


6 


3 


4i 


41 


21 


M. 


Found putrid in the water. 






I9i 


6 


3i 


4i 


5 


1 


M. 


Drowned. 






20 


7 






— — 


2 


M. 


Born alive(ossification defective) 
( Stillborn (ossification defective) 






19i 


5 


3* 


4 


4i 





F. 


1 the large fontanelle 1 1 in. long 


PerfecUy 


















( and 1 in. broad. 


mature. 




21 








— 





1 


F. 


Found putrid in the water. 






. 








— 





OJ 


M. 


Stillborn. 






20 


7 


— 


— 


— 


Of 


M. 


{ Stillborn; severe forceps-labour; 
( cranial injuries. 






20 


71 


3 


4 


5 


If 


M. 


Stillborn ; severe labour. 






20 


71 











2 


F. 


Putrid. 






18 


61 


3 


4 


4f 


If 


M. 


Died from apoplexy. 






19 


7 





— 




1 


F. 








20 


7| 


3i 


4 


5i 


2 


M. 


Born alive ; died from apoplexy. 






20 


65 




— 




2 


M. 


Bom alive ; died from apoplexy. 






20i 


7 


— 


— 


— 


If 


M. 


Born alive ; died from apoplexy. 
i Taken out of a cesspool per- 
( fectly putrid. 






21 


4f 





— 


— 


2 


— 




















Bom alive ; drowned in broth. 






201 


7 


3i 


4 


5 


21 


~" 


( Born alive ; died of cardiac apo- 
Born ahve ; drowned m unne. 






18i 


51 


3 


3f 


^\ 


2 


— 




















\ 




21 
21 


71 
9 


31 
3 


4i 
41 


5 
5i 


31 
2 


— 


Bom alive ; died of apoplexy. 


















F. 


( Bom in the ninth month ; died 






17 


5 


— 


•""" 


~~" 


1 


next day. 


Extra- 




21 


H 


3J 


4i 


5i 


31 


M. 


Had lived one day (ossification 
( defective). 


uterine 




18 


6f 











2 


M. 


Lived two days. 


life of 
















M. 


(Mature and well -nourished; 
( lived three days. 


from 
one to 




— 


— 





-~~ 


■~~ 


U 




181 


5 











2 


F. 


Lived four days. 


eight 
days. 




16 




3 


4 


44 





M. 


i Bom in the eighth month ; ill- 
( nourished ; lived seven days. 






19 


51 





_ 





2! 


M. 


Lived eight days. 






19 




— 


— 





If 


— 


Died atrophied after eight days. 



I 80. SIGNS OF FOETAL MATURITY. 



Measurements — Continued. 



Age. 


No. 


Lengtk 


Wgt. 


Diameter of Head. 


11 
11 


Sex. 


Aemarfce. 


Trane- 
Tene 


"Sf 


^iST 


Extra- . 
uterine 

life of / 
from nine * 
to fifteen 

days. 


^ 1 
1 

1 


Inche*. 
18 

20 
17 


Lte. 

7 


Inch. 

2J 


Inch. 

4 


Ineh. 


lines 

Of 
3i 

If 


M. 
M. 

F. 


A Stout child ; lived nine days. 
Lived fourteen days. 
Lived fifteen days ; died syphi- 
litic. 


Extra- 
uterine 
life of 
from six- 
teen days 
to one 
month. 


/ 


18 
18 


— 


— 


-- 


— 


2i 


M. 
M. 


.Twin brothers; lived nineteen 
( days; suffocated in carbonic 
< oxide j?as; weakly; atrophied. 
f The difference is extremely 
^ interesting. 


Extra- 
uterine 
life of 

from 
one to 

three 
months. 




19 
22 
19i 

20 
20 

21 


— 


— 


— 




3 

3i 

2 

3 

5 

3i 

5 

5 
4 


M. 
M. 
F. 

M. 

F. 
F. 

M. 

F. 
M. 


( Well - nourished; lived four 

I weeks ; suffocated. 

(Very stout; six weeks old; 

) drowned. 

j Emaciated ; six weeks and four 

( days old ; poisoned. 

( WeU-nourished (large fontanelle 

J only half-an-inch) ; lived ten 

\ weeks. 

Very stout; eleven weeks old. 

Atrophied; ten weeks old. 
(Three months old; suffocated 
( through carelessness. 

Three months old ; atrophied. 

Two months old ; atrophied. 


Extra- / 

uterine 

life of 

from ^ 
three to \ 

six 
months. V 




— 


— 


— 


— 


— 


2 

3i 

4 


F. 
M. 
F. 


( Three months and ^ve days old ; 
( syphilitic ; atrophied. 

Stout child ; six months old. 
( Four months and two days old; 
( died of sporadic cholera. 


Extra- 
uterine 
life of 
from / 
seven \ 
months 
to one 
year. 


1 


— 


— 


~~~ 


— 


— 


3 
5 
4 

8 
7 

5 


F. 
F. 
M. 

M. 
F. 

M. 


Nine months old; much ema- 
ciated. 

Nine months old ; died atrophied. 
(Nine and a-half months old; 
\ atrophied and anaemic. 

One year old ; much emaciated. 
[ One year old ; very fine child ; 
) struck dead. 

I One year and four days old ; 
j died of syphilis and tubercu- 
\ losis of the lungs. 



S 80. SIGNS OF FGETAL MATURITY. 



27 



Measurements — Continued, 



Age. 


No. 


Length. 


Wgt. 


Diameter of Head. 


®S5 


Bex. 


Bemarks. 


Trant- 
Ter»e. 


"^T 


^iar 


Extra- ( 
uterine 
life of ] 
from one | 
to two 
years. \ 


1 
1 


Inches. 


Ltw. 


Inch. 


Inch. 


Inch. 


lines 

5 

7 


F. 
M. 


( One year and a-quarter old ; 
) died phthisical. 
1 Rachitic child ; one year and ar 
\ half old ; humed to death. 



A summary of these observations gives the following results : — 



When horn. No. of Children. 

In the seventh (solar) month ) 

In the eighth „ j, j ^^ 

In the ninth „ 9 

Mature 62 



8ize of Osseous 
Nucleus. 



— 2 lines, 
f — 4 lines. 



From these observations the following conclusions may be drawn: — 

a. When there is as yet no visible trace of the centre of ossifica- 
tion in the inferior femoral epiphysis, then the foetus can be no more 
than from thirly-six to thirty-seven weeks old. 

b. The commencement of this osseous nucleus, which is at first 
about the size of a hempseed, or of the head of an ordinary fly (half-a- 
line), indicates a foetal age of from thirty-seven to thirty-eight weeks, 
supposing the child to have been stillborn ; in the opposite case the 
child may have been born alive before this time, without any osseous 
nucleus, which then becomes developed during its extra-uterine life. 
In rare instances of unusually retarded development, a foetus of forty 
weeks may exhibit only a trifling commencement of this nucleus, 

c. When this osseous nucleus possesses a diameter of from three- 
quarters to three lines, it indicates that the foetus must have attained 
a uterine age of forty weeks, always supposing of course that the 
child has been stillborn. In one instance of unusually retarded de- 
velopment, vrith defective ossification of the skull, of a girl born 
perfectly mature, we found no osseous nucleus. 

d. We may conclude that the child has lived after its birth, when 
the osseous nucleus measures more than three lines. Isolated excep- 



28 I 80. SIGNS OF FCETAL MATURITY. 

tions to this rule in children particularly well developed, will certainly 
occur but seldom. But the Table just given proves that the reverse 
of this rule does not hold good, that an osseous nucleus of less than 
three lines in diameter does not prove that the child has not lived — of 
course while duly considering this important symptom, we must not 
neglect the other signs of maturity, and we must also take into con- 
sideration the individual differences in each child, particularly as to 
general nourishment. This symptom has, moreover, the additional 
value that it is not obliterated by putrefaction, and we are thereby 
placed in a position to determine the age (possible maturity) of a 
foetus long after its death by an inspection of the femur alone.* 

11. The pupillary membrane is not to be found in a mature child 
(indeed not from the end of the twenth-eighth or thirtieth week). 

12. The testicles are now found in the scrotum (but they may be 
there at the thirtieth week), the scrotum is no longer of such a dirty 
brownish-red, or so'smooth as bfcfore the fortieth week, but is corru- 
gated and of the usual dirty flesh-oolour. 

13. The Mia majora. cover the vagina atid th^ clitoris, whith is no , 
longer prominent. ; 

14. The umbilical cord of the mature child is of the average 
length of the body, that is from edghteen to twenty-one inchfes^ whilst 
it is ia th^ same pi!oportion shorter in immature children. Yet 
cords longe(r than from eighteen to twenty-one inches ate very fre- 
quent, and, on the other hand, in medico-legal cases entire umbilical 
cords are itot generally seen at all, since this usually occurs only in 
cases of precipitate birth, where placenta and child are bom together, 
and made away with unseparated. 

15. Passing by those well-know^ functional differences (not ob- 
servable on the dissecting-table) which distinguish a living mature 
child from an immature one, I will in conclusion only quote from 

• Ollivier relates, op. ciL, p. 346, two cases of this nature. In one, the 
remains of a child were found in a cesspool : they were transformed into 
adipocire. In the femoral epiphysis, he found an osseous nucleus of a brown 
colour, fissured, and like a dried juniper-berry. It measured eight milli- 
metres in diameter (3| lines). He concluded from this that the child must 
have lived for some weeks. In another case, the skeleton of a child was 
found in a chimney. In the femoral epiphysis no osseous nucleus could be 
discovered, and 0. held himself justified in concluding from this, that the 
child in question had been born before maturity. Vide § 97, for further 
information in regard to the state of the osseous nucleus as a proof of the 
child having lived. 



§ 80. SIGNS OF FCETAL MATURITY. 



29 



Giinz, whose careful investigations are worthy of the fullest con- 
fidence, the dimermons of the hones of a mature child, which may be 
useful in cases of disinterment : — * 



Height of the frontal part of the frontal bone . 

Breadth of the same .... 

Length of the pan orbitalis 

Breadth of the same .... 

Parietal bone from its anterior superior angle to its in- 
ferior posterior one .... 

Parietal bone from its anterior inferior angle to its superior 
posterior one .... 

Height of the pars occipitalis of the os ocdpitis . 

Breadth of the same .... 

Height of the squamous portion of the temporal bone from 
the upper edge of the auditory foramen 

Height of the malar bone .... 

Breadth of the malar bone .... 

Height of the nasal bone . . • • 

Breadth of the nasal bone .... 

Height of the superior maxillary bone from ike processus 
alveolaris to the apex of the processus nasalis 

Length of the superior maxillary bone from the spinal, 
nasal ant. to the apex of the i^roc. zygamat. . 

Length of each half of the lower jaw . 

Breadth of the lower jaw 

Length of the seven cervical vertebrae 

Length of the twelve dorsal vertebrae . 

Length of the five lumbar vertebrae 

Length of the sacrum and coccyx 

Length of the collar-bone . 

Length of the shoulder-blade 

Breadth of the shoulder-blade 

Length of the humerus 

Length of the ulna 

Length of the radius 

Length of the femur 

Length of the patella 

Breadth of the patella 

Length of the tibia 

Length of the fibula 

All the other supposed signs of maturity, for instance, that the 
mouth in mature children is slightly open, the neck full and firm, the 
umbilical cord inserted exactly in the middle between the pubis and 
♦ Gunz, der Leichnam des Neugeboren. Leipzig, 1827, s. 82. 



2 inches 3 lines. 


1 


»> 


10 


it 


1 


a 






1 


» 






3 


»» 


3 


it 


3 


»> 


3 


it 


2 


f> 


— 


it 


1 


>» 


10 


it 


1 


» 


— 


it 


- 


»> 


6 


a 


1 


>} 


— 


it 


— 


>> 


5 


it 


— 


it 


3 


19 


1 


ft 


— 


it 


1 


f> 


I 


tt 


1 


it 


10 


tt 


— 


» 


7 


tt 


1 


it 


3 


it 


3 


it 


9 


tt 


2 


it 


3 


ti 


2 


it 


3 


tt 


1 


ti 


7 


it 


1 


it 


6 


ti 


1 


it 


2 


it 


3 


it 


— 


it 


2 


it 


10 


tt 


2 


it 


8 


tt 


3 


it 


6 


it 


— 


it 


9 


ti 


— 


a 


8 


tt 


3 


it 


2 


it 


3 


)> 


1 


»> 



30 S 81. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

the ensiform cartilage, we cannot regard as of any value, because of 
the extremely numerous exceptions. 



§ 81. Illustrative Cases. 

Case CCCXXXV. — Judicial Query: Has this Child been 

Mature ? 

This case was interesting because it occurred under the present 
penal code, and yet the circumstances of the case required the matu- 
rity of the child to be inquired into, though the law makes no such 
distinction. On the 26th of June, 1851, a new-born child was found 
in cleaning out a dungpit and was brought to us next day for medico- 
legal examination. The unmarried woman W. suspected of having 
given birth to the child, confessed that from the middle of November, 
1850, to the 20th of April, 1851, she had frequently had carnal con- 
nection with N. N. About the new-year her menstruation first 
ceased. In the middle of May she suddenly felt herself unwell dur- 
ing the night, she went to the pail of dirty water, and there a number 
of masses of coagulated blood came out of her sexual parts, in which 
however there was no compact mass to be felt. This blood she flung 
into the dungheap. The accused consequently confessed to have 
given birth, not however to a mature child, but to a five months 
foetus. The trifling relaxation of her abdominal coverings, the in- 
significant scars on her abdomen, but especially the preservation of 
the hymen, all were in favour of her statement and against the sup- 
position that she had given birth to a mature child. On the other 
hand, the foetus placed before us, which was already much putrefied, 
was nineteen inches in length, weighed five pounds, the diameters of 
the head were respectively three, three and a-half, and four and a- 
quarter inches, the breadth across the shoulders was four inches, 
the transverse diameter of the chest was four inches, the longi- 
tudinal one three inches, the breadth across the hips was three 
inches, the dimensions consequently of a child at the full time and 
not of a five months foetus ; the cartilages of the nose and ears were 
already firm to feel, as were also the nails, which reached to the tips 
of the fingers ; the labia majora covered the vaginal entrance. The 
osseus nucleus of femoral epiphysis was two lines and three-quarters 
in diameter. The amount of putrefaction present prevented the as- 
certaining of any other symptoms, bat these sufliced to prove with 



§81. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 31 

certainty that the child was no five months foetus^ but a mature and 
fully-developed child. The appearances found on the mother also, 
which corresponded exactly with her statements, were not consonant 
with those of the foetus ; here, therefore, we had a case the reverse of 
that of a supposititious child, viz., an imputed one ! (The other 
appearances, which were not important, are omitted as irrelevant 
to the present question.) After the delivery of our opinion the pub- 
lic prosecutor did not feel at liberty to go on with the case, since 
from the peculiar circumstances of the case there was no objective 
corpus delicti existent. 

Case CCCXXXVI. — Judicial Query : Has this Child been 

MORE THAN MaTURB ? 

This case was not a criminal, but a civil one, relative to the dogma 
of protracted gestation, and afibrding a scandalous side-piece to the 
well-known case of Louis, sur les naissances tardives. Listen, how 
far impudence can go ! A man, eighty -two years of age, formerly a 
subaltern o£Bcial, had suffered during the latter years of his life 
from carcinoma of the bladder and both testicles^ and finally died, 
after years of suffering, on the 22nd of August, 18 — , in a state of 
general dropsy. He had lived very much alone, for his married 
daughter by a former marriage lived abroad (in Russia). From 
gratitude for her attentive kindness to him, he had married his cook, 
about half-a-year before his death. In January, five months after 
the death of her husband, the young widow came forward and de- 
clared herself to be six months pregnant (I !), and on the 1st of June, 
she gave birth to a female child, the legitimacy of which was, as may 
be easily supposed, disputed by the married daughter of the deceased, 
who had now returned to Berlin. The weight of the body pro- 
duced was seven pounds and a-half, its length twenty inches, the 
transverse diameter of the head was three inches and a-qaarter, the 
longitudinal four inches, the diagonal five inches, the breadth across 
the shoulders was five inches, the transverse diameter of the chest 
was four inches, the longitudinal one three inches, the breadth 
across the hips was three inches : and in accordance with these 
figures, which perfectly represent the normal measurements of a foetus 
of forty weeks, we, in the first place, gave a negative answer to the 
question put to us : — Is this an eleven months foetus ? Next in 
regard to the life and death of the child, only two portions of the 



32 § 81. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

lower lobe of the right lung were of a bright-red colour and floated^ 
aU the other criteria were in favour of the child having been dead 
when born. We assumed that the child while in the birth had made 
an attempt to breathe, but had subsequently died and been stiUbom. 
This supposition was subsequently confirmed by the accoucheur, who 
stated, that the child had died apoplectic while being turned, and was 
dead when bom. — (This case, like that of Louis, gives an instructive 
proof how important it is in all cases of doubtful protracted gesta- 
tion to ascertain the procreative power of the presumed father at 
the nominal period of impregnation. lUis man, as above described, 
was said to have been capable of procreating four weeks before his 
death ! !.)* 

• Vid. Biological Part, Spec. Div., § 31. 



CHAPTER II. 

OF THE LIFE OF A CHILD DURING AND AFTER BIRTH. 

Statutory Regulations. 

General Common Law, § 12, Tit. 1, Part I.— Civil rights, tohich 
would have been inherited hy a child yet unborn, if it had been a^ctually 
born at the time of its conception, are reserved for it conditionally on 
its being born alive, 

§ 13. In regard to this, it is to be assumed as jfyroved, that a child 
has been bom alive when unimpeachable witnesses jpresent at the birth 
have distinctly heard it cry. 

§ 82. Life without Respiration. 

The teclinical language of forensic medicine attaches to many 
expressions a sense diflferent from that aflfixed to them in general 
medical science, and this must be so, since forensic medicine has 
quite specific (judicial) purposes to serve. Thus it speaks of 
''Insanity,'^ "Idiocy,'' ''Important injury,'' and the like, in the 
sense which the statutes and their makers have assigned to these 
words. Thus also the word ' Life ' when spoken of in connection 
with a newborn child, is not used in the same general physiological 
sense in which all organic beings, even plants, and of course also 
the foetus in utero, may be said to live, but in foro the term ' Ufe' 
must be regarded as perfectly synonymous with the term 'respiration.' 
Life means respiration ; not to have breathed, is not to havh 
LIVED. Only that life of a newborn child which is dependant on 
respiration, mdependent and unconnected with the mother, can be 
proved; every other life is only hypothetical, and the medical jurist 
can only base his decision upon proof. Of course it cannot be 
doubted that life without respiration is possible, and does occur in the 
case of newborn children, Daily experience proves irrefragably that 
children are born apparently dead, which do not, therefore, breathe, 

VOL. III. D 



34 5 82. LIFE WITHOUT RESPIRATION. 

and which are yet subsequently roused to respiratory life.* It 
cannot be doubted, that a child possessing only this pseudo-life can 
be killed, passively as well as actively, by omission as well as by 
commission. If no attempt at resuscitation has been made, the 
spark of this pseudo-life may have been extinguished thus, and thus 
alone. But who would presume to suppose, in any given case, the 
subject of an accusation, that this spark would have been kindled to 
the full flame of life, had this attempt not been omitted ? It would 
probably be easier to prove the murder of this pseudo-living child, 
supposing it to have been actively ill-treated. It is possible and 
imaginable that the circumstances of a given case might supply more 
or less complete proof that a child bom, not dead, but only apparently 
so, had been killed immediately after its birth. In regard to this, 
Devergie's opinion, which is remarkable as coming from a practical 
man, is perfectly erroneous, and deserves to be warned against; he 
says, that the appearance of coagulated blood, about the head 
or elsewhere, will afford proof of this character in such cases. I 
have already (Gen. Div., §11, p. 28, Vol. I.) opposed this er- 
roneous doctrine, and I shall return to the subject by and by 
(§102). But other appearances may exist on the body, which 
may make it probable, and perhaps prove, that violence has been 
infficted upon a body apparently dead. For instance, the throat 
may be cut, the larynx or cranial bones may be fractured, or there 
may be a mark of strangulation, &c., and it is not even impossible 
that traces of reaction may be found upon the injured parts, as 
happens indeed even in the case of injuries inflicted after death has 
actually occurred (Spec. Div., § 33, p. 117, Vol. I.). Nevertheless, 
such cases are extremely rare; their peculiarities must, therefore, be 
distinctly apprehended, and the matter placed clearly before the 
Judge, and left for his decision how far proof of a crime is thereby 
afforded. Still more rare are all those cases which have been fabri- 
cated and published, or sought for in older records with a diligence 
worthy of a better cause, and which are also intended to prove the 

* Dr. Masohka has published in the Prager Yierteljahrschrift (1854, 1X1., 
s. 1, &o.)) two oases whioh, in this respeot, may be said to stand alone ; the 
one he relates from documentary evidence, the other was observed by him- 
self. The first was the case of a child which was bom secretly and buried, 
and was roused to life after the lapse of seven hours ; the second was a child 
bom apparently dead, in which the sounds of the heart could be faintly 
heard after the lapse of twenty-three hours. 



§ 82. LIFE WITHOUT RESPIRATION. * 36 

possibility of life existing without respiration, and rightly so if only 
meant to refer to life of one second's duration, such as birth of the 
ovum entire, birth in a bath, &c., cases which are to be looked upon 
as curiosities, and to be decided on in accordance with the other 
circumstances attendant on the birth, but which are certainly not 
fitted to find a general application in the occurrences of daily life, 
that is, in regard to the immensely larger proportion of usual births. 
Consequently — ^there is, as must be confessed, a short post-partum 
life without respiration ; but there are no means of recognizing the 
previous existence of such a life, after it has ceased, therefore a life 
of this character is not acknowledged in medico-legal practice, which 
only acknowledges the existence of a life dependant on respiration, 
because that is the only one whose existence can be recognized and 
proved. The correctness of this dogma has been recognized from the 
earliest times. In Galen's work Be Loc. Aff., libr. VL, Cap. F., we find 
the following passage : — In confesso est, respirationem a vita et vitam a 
respiratipne separari non posse, adeo ut vivens omnino spiret et spirans 
omnino vivat. Short and clear ! As in the Latin dialects the word 
'expire' {expirer) is synonymous with mori, so also in the parent 
tongue was the similar word exspirare, whilst we (the Germans, who 
have no such word as ' expire') use the more figurative expression of 
Ho exhale the last breath' as equivalent for 'to die.' And, what is 
not without special bearing on our subject, the identity of respiration 
with life has even been recognized in the language of lawyers, for in 
it exspirare signifies to die, to disannul, to become extinct, to cease 
to be; since the Pandects employ the expression, obligatio exspirat. 
We can perceive the value placed by the ancient lawgivers upon the 
pulmonary function as an evidence of the child's life, both from the 
pre-Justinian and the old German statutes, according to which the 
well-known "crying within four walls" {vox attdita intra quatuor 
parietes domus) was required as necessary to the proof of life. The 
quotation from the General Common Law which we have already 
given (p. 83, Vol. III.) shows that our Prussian statute book also 
requires the " cry" of the child as proof. On the other hand, it has 
been objected to our statute book that it actually assumes the possi- 
bility of a life without respiration; since its §§ 181 and 182 already 
quoted, speak of the death of the " foetus in a pregnant woman," and 
only that which has life can be killed. Ergo I But, although, as we 
have already hinted, it can never be contested that the foetus in the 
womb does " live," yet it must be acl^owledged that the lawgiver 

i>2 



36 -§ 82. LIFE WITHOUT RESPIRATION. 

looks upon the matter from quite another point of view than the 
physician, particularly the forensic physician. The former has been 
at all times perfectly in the right to threaten foeticide with punishment. 
In his position, he is bound to protect the earliest commencement of 
human life as carefully as that already developed into man, and a 
foetus is in by far the lai^er proportion of cases the first commence- 
ment of a human being. And if the future existence as man of this 
Aomunculus may be rendered impossible by a criminal procedure, 
dare the legislator, in the interest of public safety and morality, ig- 
nore this possibility, and leave the crime unpunished ? Certainly not. 
But this position and duty of the legislator have no bearing whatever on 
those of the (forensic) physician. The latter in such a case has only 
to explain to the Judge that the death of the foetus in the womb has 
or has not occurred. His task is then fulfilled, and should he be asked, 
as I once was, whether the expelled foetus had been alive in tKe 
womb ? he may answer the question affirmatively with an unbur- 
dened conscience, notwithstanding any further explanation which he 
might feel himself bound to give, if called upon to define the nature 
of tAis (foetal) life. The Judge will not hesitate one instant in regard 
to the views and intentions of the legislator, notwithstanding the 
limitations of this definition ! ^ And with suck arguments, as those 

* To tMs opinion, it has been judicially objected, that it is a most dan- 
gerous view to hold in regard to criminal cases, since it might happen that 
actual child-murder (on living but not breathing children) might remain 
unpunished, because the forensic physician holding this opinion has de- 
clared that the child was not " alive." To this Judicial objection, in itself, 
we have no remarks to make, — except that, according to our many years' ex- 
perience of criminal life, it has certainly more the air of ^ priori theory than of 
a posteriori, practice about it ; that is, in other words, that cases such as those 
supposed are of very rare occurrence in real life ; — we have only to repeat, 
that the forensic physician must steadily maintain his own mce?eco -scientific 
position. And in regard to this, we must still assert there is only one kind 
of life — that dependant on respiration — that can be proved. Moreover, even 
if it concerned us, we can scarcely believe that actual and evident attempts 
at child-murder, such as cutting the throat, smashing the skull, &c., of 
children who can be proved never to have breathed, can be so perfectly 
ignored and looked upon as non-existent, as seems to be feared in the judicial 
opinion just given, provided the medical expert does his duty in properly 
estimating all the circumstances of the individual case, and laying it clearly 
before the Judge ; for, as we have distinctly laid down in all the foregoing 
paragraphs, the case must be decided as a whole, and not in its separate par- 
ticulars. Finally, to the fact that our opinions are also held by the highest 
Medical Board of the country (J^ide the New Regulations, Vol. I., p. 92), 



§ 83. VAGITUS UTERINUS. 37 

quoted (p. 34) has it been thought possible to diminish the proba- 
tive value of the docimasia pulmonaria ? And is there any one mode 
of proof in the whole range of forensic medicine that could stand firm 
against such a mode of confutation ? Are the ordinary modes of 
chemical investigation in cases of arsenical poisoning useless and un- 
certain, because in many cases — and sooth to say, much more often 
than in those above referred to — no arsenic can be detected, though 
it has been undubitably present ? Is this too the case with the criteria 
employed to determine a doubtful case of pregnancy, because, as is 
well known, they are not applicable in every instance, nor at every 
period of every pregnancy ? 

The other objection so often made to the probative value of the 
docimasia pulmonaris is apparently of more value than that just 
referred to, namely, that though the docimasia pulmonaria may 
prove the respiratory hfe of the child, yet this is all, and it cannot 
decide that respiration has not occurred b^ore birth, has speedily 
ceased, and the child has then been bom dead. 



§ 83. Respiration befoee Birth. — Vagitus Uterinus. 

The doctrine of the vagitm uterinus has recently been removed 
from the domain of the lying-in room, and placed upon the field of 
scientific observation by Kohlschiitter, Mayer, Berard, Jaquemier, 
Vierordt, Hecker, Schwartz, &c.* I refer, namely, to the discovery 
of capillary extravasations beneath the pleura, upon the aorta and on 
the heart, which I have ij^ra^^^ ^petechial ecchymoses, to give a proper 
idea of them to those unacquainted with them, because they are in- 
deed strikingly like petechige. These have been already described in 
speaking of the death of newborn children from suffocation (Spec. 
Div., § 40, p. 126, Vol. II.), and we have there pointed out how fre- 
quently, and by how many observers, this appearance has been noticed. 
We have also already shown that the origin of this appearance can be 

we will not ascribe more than its due value ; for however honourable this 
may be, we willingly confess that in matters of science there is no superior 
tribunal. 

• It is unnecessary to do more here than refer to the oft-quoted case of 
respiration within the ovum, first published by Huter in the " Deutschen 
Klinik" of 19th April, 1856, and subsequently in his pamphlet on the occur- 
rence of air in the human ovum (Marburg, 1856), and his quite peculiar 
statement in regard to the development of air within the human ovum ! ! 



38 $ 83. VAGITUS UTERINUS. 

ascribed to no other cause than to a kind of instinctive and forced 
respiration within the uterus, when the natural and necessary pro- 
cess of gaseous interchange, afforded by the umbilical cord and 
placenta, has been disturbed or interrupted. It certainly deserves to 
be called remarkable that forensic medicine up to the latest date has 
taken no notice of a physiological doctrine, already adverted to by 
Bohn one hundred and fifty years ago, and which has occupied much 
of the attention of physiologists and accoucheurs. — Since, therefore, 
it can be no longer doubted, that the foetus may make instinctive 
attempts to respire, and in certain circumstances necessarily does so, 
so also it must, i jpriori — even though it had never been heard '^ to 
cry in the womb'^ — ^be acknowledged that it might make more per- 
fect and successful respiratory movements. Hecker has observed 
and related a case which is too important to be omitted here,* 

'^A multipara, aged twenty-eight, on the '20th of May, 1853, 
without having felt more than the merest indications of commencing 
labour, lost suddenly in bed a large quantity of liqtwr amnii, and on 
examination, along loop of the cord, pulsating normally and distinctly, 
was found prolapsed beyond the external genitals, and lying along the 
posterior wall of the pelvis. Th& os uteri was dilated to the size of 
a halfpenny, and the head of the child was felt to be very moveable 
and high above the brim of the pelvis. The sounds of the foetal 
heart were distinctly heard at the left side of the mother. The attempts 
to replace the cords with instruments failed, so it was only pushed into 
the vagina, and kept there by a piece of sponge. One hour subse- 
quently the OS uteri was completely dilated, but instead of the head of 
the child, which had evidently receded to the left, the right elbow 
was now found presenting ; the pulsation in the cord remained the 
same. The version of the child, performed under chloroform, was by 
no means difficult, but in introducing the hand along the posterior 
wall of the pelvis, it was found impossible, in endeavouring to keep 
the loop of the cord to one side, to avoid making some, though but 
slight, pressure upon it, and the repeated deep inspirations made by 
the child, and distinctly felt by the hand employ ed^ showed that this 
pressure was sufficient to produce an immediate besoin de re- 
spirer. The head presented no inconsiderable obstacle to the ex- 
traction, though the usual traction was powerfully put in force. The 
child, a girl, seven pounds in weight, and ninet^n inches long, was 

• Op. cU., p. 127, Yol XL, 8 19. 



§ 83. VAGITUS UTERINUS. 39 

asphyxiated when born, and could not be resuscitated though arti- 
ficial respiration was employed very successfully, as proved by the 
dissection. Hypersemise in the thoracic and abdominal organs, and also 
subpleural extravasations were not absent in this case. Whether air 
had actually got into the organs of respiration during the intra- 
uterine attempts at respiration detailed, could not, of course, be 
ascertained, because of their artificial inflation.^' 

To this we may annex the analogous observations of Hohl,* in 
cases of breach presentation, where, with the head still lying in the 
pelvis, the uterus has contracted and separated the placenta, without 
the head being thereafter speedily delivered. In two such cases Hohl 
has seen "the thorax of the child elevated three or four times after 
each other J' and the child thereafter bom dead. In the lungs of 
both children there was no trace of air. In one case also oi placenta 
pravia, this accoucheur observed respirrtory movements. During 
the version and extraction of the child, which was immediately per- 
formed, Hohl observed "even during the version, lively respiratory 
movementSy' which he regarded as '^actual inspirations" The child 
was dead and pale. In all these three cases th^e were found peter 
ehial ecchymoses, namely, " numerous punctate extravasations on the 
surface of the heart and lungs.^^ 

It cannot, therefore, be doubted, that attempts at respiration are 
made by the intra-uterine foetus even before the membranes are rup- 
tured, and that the liquor ^nnii may actually be thus inhaled ; nor 
that similar attempts may be made cfter the rupture of the mem- 
branes, and that the child may still be born dead {Fide p. 128, 
Vol. II.). t But what connection have these interesting physiolgi- 
cal experiments with the medico-legal docimasia pulmonaris? Th^ 
lungs of these children sank under water in every case, except in 
those few in which the artificial inflation employed in the attempts 
to resuscitate them had made the lungs capable of floating. AUthe 
children were bom dead; indeed, in several cases related by Elsasser 
they were putrid. From another and totally diff^ent point of view, 
also, the fact of intra-uterine r^^vcdXion, practically considered, is not 
without influence on the solution of the question of the doubtful life 
of the extra-uterine foetus — the child after birth. In all these cases in 
which children which had made intra-uterine attempts to respire have 

• Op, cit, p. 128, Vol. II., s. 837. 

t Vide the experiments made by Schwartz on foetal rabbits, related at 
p. 128, Vol. II. 



40 5 83. VAGITUS UTERINUS. 

been assisted into the world by accoucheurs^ the labour has been^ with- 
out exception^ assisted and more or less laborious, as indeed is apparent 
from a consideration of the conditions necessary for the production of 
instinctive respiratory movements. How much greater must the 
delay in the birth and the other favouring circumstances be sup- 
posed to be, which actually must occur and coincide, in order to 
permit the occurrence of not merely a few short, instinctive, and 
fruitless respiratory movements, but of actual respiration — ^the 
streaming in of atmospheric air into the air-passages ! The liquor 
amnii must have escaped, the child, which is not advancing, must 
have the face presenting, the os uteri must be fully dilated, and the 
vaginal canal kept forcibly open by the hand or otherwise, in order to 
favour a true and actual process of respiration. In the few cases of 
vagitus uterinus aU these conditions did in fact concur. But do they 
also concur in those cases with which the medical jurist is concerned, 
or in those newborn children which are found dead, and which give oc- 
casion for the employment of the docimasia pulmonaris ? The question 
must be answered unconditionally in the negative. Even if it were 
not known that concealed births — and only such can give occasion to 
the application of the test — are anything but protracted, but that they 
are rather in by far the larger proportion of cases very rapid in their 
course, or indeed precipitate, because they could not otherwise be 
concealed,* such must have been for that very reason, h priori, sup- 
posed to be the case. In cases of rapid labour, however, all the con- 
ditions necessary, as well as all the exigencies which might necessitate 
an attempt to respire in uiero, are wholly wanting. Considering, 
therefore, that from the nature of the circumstances, only those new- 
bom children are subjected to the dodtnasia pulmonaris whose birth 
has been concealed, that concealed births are very rapid, while the 
vagitua uterinua cannot take place in such rapid births, but only 
where the labour is protracted and requiring the assistance of art, 
THAT UESPIBJLTION WHICH IS PEOVED BY THE docimosia pulmonaris 

TO HAVE OCCXJREBD IN THE CASE OP A CHILD SECEETLY BORN, IS TO BE 
REGARDED AS HAVING TAKEN PLACE NEITHER DURING, NOR BEFORE, 
BUT AFTER ITS BIRTH, and the child MUST, THEREFORE, BE REGARDED 

* Amongst the medico-legal oases of dissection of newborn children which 
come before us, there constantly occur a most disproportionately large 
number in which the children have been found still attached to the placenta, 
and are thus laid before us: a sufficient proof of the frequency of precipitate 
labour in oases of concealed birth. 



§ 84. THE DOCIMASIA PULMONARIS. 41 

AS HAVING B££N BOSN ALIVE. Cascs in which the chfld with ids 
head already bom and lying between the thighs of the mother, ex- 
posed to the current of atmospheric air, which excites its respiration, 
can be no longer reckoned among instances of vagitus uterintis.* 

§ 84. The Docimasia Pulmonaeis. — a. Vaulting of the Chest. 

That the thorax of a child which has breathed, particularly when 
it has thereby completely distended and filled its lungs with air and 

* The yiew here adopted, which is the only one at all answerable to the 
case, is not new, but was laid down forty-seven years ago by our superior 
Medical Board, the Royal Scientific Commission, in an opinion distinguished 
by its brevity, without anything of importance being omitted. It is here 
given entire. It is dated 27th Feb., 1816 : — " In accordance with a requi- 
sition £rom the Supreme Court of Judicature, the Ministry of the Interior 
has requested the Scientific Commission for Medical Afiairs to deliver their 
opinion upon the two following questions : 1st. "Whether there are any in- 
fallible signs that respiration has taken place in utero materno f 2nd. 
What signs shall for the future be reckoned decisive as to the life of a child 
subsequent to its extrusion from the maternal genitals ? In regard to the 
first question, the only infallible proof is the declaration by trustworthy 
persons, that they have distinctly heard the child cry before it was extruded 
from the maternal genitals, and when the incidents at the birth agree with 
this. When, for instance, a person has been long in labour, so that, from 
the entire absence or deficiency in number or power of the pains, after the 
escape of the liquor amnii, the hand of the midwife or accoucheur has to be 
introduced into the uterus, in a favourable position of the child, the air 
entering by the interstices made by the introduced hand may be sufficient 
to produce respiration and crying ; this can also more easily happen when 
the head has already passed the o8 uteri, and the rest of the body has to be 
delivered by the midwife or accoucheur. Consequently, the conditions 
necessary for the production of this vagitua uterinua are of rare occurrence, 
and, as is particularly to be borne in mind, can only happen in a tedious 
labour, in which manual assistance has been given. Therefore this phenomenon 
is never to he assumed in cases of concealed birth, which happen rapidly and 
without extraneous aid. In these cases the child respires first after it has 
been bom, and the Judge can never be placed in any doubt by this pheno- 
menon, in regard to whether a child has lived after birth or no." 

** The latter part of our opinion has already sufficiently answered the second 
question. In every case of rapid and concealed, that is, self-delivery, the 
life of the child is to be regarded as a life after birth. Should, however, a 
case occur to a Judge, of an assisted birth in which it was requisite to know 
whether a vagitus uterinus had taken place, and whether a child previously 
breathing and crying had been dead when extruded from the maternal 
genitals, this could only be decided by the testimony of witnesses." 



42 § 84— a. VAULTING OF THE CHEST. 

blood, must be elevated and dilated, and consequently be more 
vaulted than previously, is just as certain as that it must, therefore, 
appear justifiable, in biostatic experiments, to pay attention to the 
degree of vaulting of the osseous thorax. Mere ocular measurement 
is, however, not sufficient here, it is indubitable that a mere ocular 
estimation cannot be termed an observation, since flat, and vaulted, in 
relation to the thorax of a newborn child, are very ambiguous defini- 
tions, and are not sufficient to satisfy even the most experienced indi- 
vidual who may have had hundreds of such bodies before him.* The 
ancient method (Daniel) of measuring the vaulting with a thread is 
but little better, since not only may the thread be more or less 
stretched in applying it, but its texture may also be more or less ex- 
tensile, and differences may be thus introduced which may be 
actually greater than those to be measured, which can only amount 
to fractions of an inch. The only method of measurement which can 
be depended upon, and which is, therefore, now generally employed, 
is to take the transverse and longitudinal diameters of the thorax by 
means of a pair of callipers. Both of these measurements must be 
greater subsequent to the complete commencement of respiratory 
life after birth, than they have been in Ikis same child shortly be/ore 
its birth. The thesis is incontestably true ; but its practical appUca- 
bility is not thereby increased. For who has measured the diameters 
of any given child previous to its extrusion from the uterus ? We are, 
therefore, obliged to resort to general comparisons, numerical 
averages, with which the results obtained in any given case are to be 
compared. This method may be perfectly sufficient where the indi- 
vidual peculiarities present such unimportant diflferences that the 
numerical average of large numbers, say of one hundred observations, 
differ but little from the results of each single observation. Such is 
the case for instance in regard to the conformation of the head of 
mature newborn children, the diameters of which are so constantly 
almost the same, that the numerical averages obtained are not merely 
the result of a computation of maxima and minima, but may be 
always confidently employed as a means of ascertaining the doubtful 
maturity of the body of any child which may be brought before us. 

• Up to the end of 1853, the number of bodies of illegitimate children either 
born dead, or that had died shortly after birth, which had been officially in- 
spected by me (for the purpose of filling up the burial certificates), amounted 
to 1695 in aU, and all the data capable of being afK)rded by inspection were 
carefully attended to, and among these the conformation of the thorax. 



$ 84— a. VAULTING OF THE CHEST. 43 

And the question is, whether the diameters of the thorax in newborn 
children, those bom alive as well as those bom dead, present any 
similar or even approximativelj similar constant relative proportions, 
in order to enable us to make an analogous use of the numerical 
averages obtained from a large number of observations? This 
question must be met by an unqualified negative. The following 
table comprehends the measurements of the thorax of 238 mature 
newborn children, 158 of them bom alive and 80 dead. The first 
102 cases were recent bodies and actual medico-legal cases. I have 
eliminated all those numerous cases of bodies in an advanced degree 
of putrefraction as too uncertain, since the distention of the body 
completely alters the measurements ; the other 186 cases have been, 
like those detailed at p. 19, Vol. III., measured at my desire in our 
two Eoyal Maternity Hospitals. It was to be expected, h priori, that 
differences in the manner of applying the measuring instrument, 
when performed by different observers, that the longer or shorter 
duration of the respiration, that the different degrees of maturity of 
the different children, that the varying conditions of the bodies and 
other drcumstauces, must eaert some influence upon the results of 
the measurements. It has actually happened in our observations, as 
well as in those of earlier observers, that real and important differ*- 
ences have arisen, which distinctly point out the uncertainty of the 
diameters of the thorax as a criterion of the docimasia jmlmonaris. 



44 



5 84— a. VAULTING OF THE CHEST. 



DiAJIBTEKS OF THE ThOHAX IN 238 MATUKE NeWBOKN ChILDEEK- 
158 OF THEM BOKN ALIVE, AND 80 DeAD. 

Original Measurements retained as in former Table, p. 1 9, Yol. III. 









Diameter 










Diameter 




No. 


^ 


1 


of Thorax. 




No. 


1 


1 


of Thorax. 




i 


1 


i 


i 








1 


1 






^ 




^ 


1 




1 




1 


H 


3 


alive; drowned 


41 




_L 


3J 


3 


bom dead 


2 


1 




3i 


3 


„ hemorrhage 


42 




— 


34 


3 


alive; apoplexy 


3 





T 


3i 


3 


„ apoplexy 


43 


— 


1 


4 


3i 


" " 


4 


1 





H 


2J 


it ^ 


44 




— 


4 


2i 


„ suffocated 


5 





1 


4 


2i 


„ drowned 


45 




— 


4i 


34 


? 


6 


1 


__ 


H 


3 


born dead 


46 


— 


1 


34 


3 


? 


7 




1 


4 


3 


ft 


47 




— 


4 


34 


? 


8 


1 





3i 


3i 


alive; drowned 


48 


— 


1 


4 


3 


? 


9 


— 


1 


3i 


2i 


„ apoplexy 


49 




— 


4* 


34 


11 


10 


1 




H 


2f 


11 It 


50 


— 


1 


3* 


3 


? 


11 





1 


4 


3 


„ suffocated 


51 




— 


4 


3 


? 


12 


1 





4 


2| 


„ apoplexy 


52 




— 


H 


3 


alive 


13 


1 





4 


3| 


,) ,) 


53 


4 


— 


4i 


H 


born dead ; 


14 




1 


4 


3i 


born dead 












weighed 10 lbs. 


15 





1 


H 


2i 


alive? 


54 


— 


1 


4i 


4i 


alive 


16 





1 


3f 


H 


alive; apoplexy 


55 


— 


1 


3i 


3 


11 


17 


1 





4 


3 


It tt 


56 


1 


— 


34 


3 


19 


18 





1 


4 


3i 


ti 11 


57 


1 


— 


34 


3 


it 


19 





1 


3 


2f 


„ drowned 


58 


— 


1 


4 


3i 


it 


20 


1 





4i 


n 


bom dead 


59 


1 


— 


4 


21 


11 


21 


— 


1 


n 


H 


„ apoplexy 


60 


1 


— 


H 


34 


it 


22 


1 





H 


2| 


? 


61 


— 


1 


^J 


3 


11 


23 





1 


4 


3 


„ apoplexy 


62 


1 


— 


4 


34 


11 


24 





1 


4 


3 


11 11 


63 


— 


1 


4 


34 


11 


25 





1 


4 


3 


11 11 


64 


1 


— 


31 


34 


It 


26 


1 


— 


4 


2i 


11 11 


65 


1 


— 


34 


3i 


ti 


27 


1 





4 


3 


11 11 


66 


1 


— 


34 


3 


11 


28 


1 





H 


4 


alive; weighed 


67 


— 


1 


34 


H 


born dead 












10 lbs. 


68 


— 


1 


3 


21 


it It 


29 


__ 


1 


4 


H 


born dead 


69 


— 


1 


H 


2f 


11 it 


30 


1 


_ 


4 


H 


alive; apoplexy 


70 


1 


— 


34 


3 


It it 


31 


1 


___ 


4 


3 


,, ? 


71 


— 


1 


4 


3* 


alive; drowned 


32 




1 


4i 


H 


„ apoplexy 


72 


1 


— 


3J 


3 


„ putrid 
„ drowned 


33 


1 


.^ 


H 


3 


9 
it * 


73 


1 


— 


3* 


3 


34 




1 


4 


3 


J 


74 


— 


1 


3 


3| 


yy suffocated 


35 


1 




H 


3 


bom dead 


75 


1 


— 


H 


3 


11 apoplexy 


36 


1 





4f 


H 


„ weighed 


76 


1 


— 


3 


3} 


11 ^ 11 












10 lbs. 


77 


1 


— 


4 


3J 


„ pulmonary 


37 


1 





4 


H 


alive; apoplexy 












apoplexy 


38 


___ 


1 


4 


3 


)} 19 


78 


— 


1 


4 


3| 


•. ,. 


39 


— 


1 


3f 


3i 




79 


1 


— 


3i 


3i 


„ cranial m- 


40 


— " 


1 


3i 


3 


„ apoplexy 












juries 



§ 84 -a. VAULTING OF THE CHEST. 

Original Measurements— Continued, 



45 







Diameter , 








Diameter 




No. 


^ 


» 


of Ihorax. 




No. 


«j 

1 


1 


of Thorax. 




1 


j 


7 


1 








Si 


5 

^ 










^ 


^ 

5 




80 


1 


2f 


alive ? 


106 






3i 


3i 


born alive 


81 


1 





3i 


2i 


born dead 


107 







3i 


3i 


)) 


82 


1 





4 


H 


alive; died atro- 


108 


1 


— 


3 


3i 


)) 












phic 


109 


— 




34 


H 


if 


83 


— 




4 


3i 


alive; fall at birth 


110 


— 




3i 


3 


tf 


84 


— 




4 


3 


born dead 


111 


— 




3§ 


34 


ft 


85 


1 


— 


4 


3 


alive; apoplexy, 


112 


— 




3i 


34 


ft 












pulmonary and 


113 


— 




3i 


34 


If 












cerebral 


114 


— 




3J 


34 


ft 


86 


— 




3i 


3i 


alive ; cranial in- 


115 


1 


— 


3i 


34 


ft 












juries 


116 


1 


— 


3i 


34 


ft 


87 


— 




4 


3| 


alive; pulmonary 


117 


1 


— 


3^ 


34 


ft 












apoplexy 


118 


1 


— 


3i 


3^ 


ft 


88 


— 




3i 


2! 




119 


1 


— 


3i 


3^ 


ft 


89 







4 


3i 


alive ; cranial in- 


120 


1 


— 


3 


34 


>» 












juries 


121 


1 


— 


3i 


2i 


>» 


90 


1 





4 


3i 


putrid; born alive 


122 


1 


— 


3i 


3 


ft 


91 







31 


3^ 


alive; drowned in 


123 


— 


1 


34 


3* 


ft 












a cesspool 


124 


1 


— 


3 


3 


ft 


92 


1 





3i 


3 


alive; suflfocated 


125 


— 


1 


3 


2i 


ft 


93 


1 





3i 


3J 


? 


126 


— 


1 


3f 


34 


tt 


94 







31 


3i 


„ drowned in 


127 


— 


1 


3J 


3 


ft 












a cesspool 


128 


1 


— 


34 


3i 


ft 


95 







4 


3i 


„ suffocated 


129 


1 


— 


34 


3i 


ft 


96 







31 


3i 


» ft 


130 


1 


— 


34 


3^ 


tf 


97 


1 





31 


3J 


born dead 


131 


— 


1 


3i 


3 


»» 


98 







3i 


3 


alive; drowned in 


132 


1 


— 


3 


2i 


» 












a cesspool 


133 


1 


— 


2| 


3 


ft 


99 


1 





31 


3 


alive; drowned 


134 


— 


1 


31 


3\ 


>» 












in pap 


135 


1 


— 


3i 


34 


ft 


100 







3i 


3 


alive; cardiac 


136 




1 


H 


3 


tf 












apoplexy 


137 


— 


1 


31 


3 


ft 


101 







3i 


H 


alive; drowned 


138 


— 


1 


3i 


34 


If 












in urine 


il39 


— 


1 


3i 


3 


» 


102 


1 





4 


3i 


alive; apoplexy 


1140 


1 


— 


3| 


3 


»» 


103 







3f 


31 


born alive * 


il41 


1 


— 


H 


3 


ft 


104 


1 





31 


3^ 


» 


142 


— 


1 


H 


H 


ft 


105 


— 




3i 


3J 


» 


143 

i 


1 


~ 


34 


3| 


tf 



• As were all the following, down to No. 188 inclusive ; these numbers, 
inclusive of the four next following children born dead, that is, from No. 
103 to 192 inclusive, are the measurements made in the Charit6 Maternity 
Hospital. 



46 



5 84-a. VAULTING OF THE CHEST. 



Original Measurements — Continued. 









Diameter 










Diameter 




No. 


i 

s 


j 


of Thorax. 




No. 


1 


1 


of Thorax. 




1 


1 

p. 


1 


1 








1 


i 




181 


1 


— 


1 


\ 




144 


__ 


1 


H 


3* 


bom alive 


2* 


2i 


born alive 


145 


— 


1 


H 


3i 


» 


182 


— 


1 


2| 


2i 


») 


146 


1 


— 




3 


» 


183 


1 


— 


3 


2i 


a 


147 


— 


1 


Uf 


3 


» 


184 


1 


— 


3 


2J 


)) 


148 


1 


— 


3 


3 


>» 


185 


1 


— 


2* 


2i 


iy 


149 


— 


1 


3 


3 


»> 


186 


1 


— 


2i 


2} 


it 


150 


1 


— 


3J 


H 


>» 


187 


1 


— 


3 


2j 


ty 


151 


— 


1 


3 


n 


>» 


188 


1 


— 


3 


3 


tt 


152 


— 


1 


3 


3 


»> 


189 


— 


1 


3i 


3 


born dead 


153 


— 


1 


34 


3 


» 


190 


1 


— 


H 


3 


)) 


154 


1 


— 


3i 


3 


» 


191 


1 


— 


3i 


2f 


fy 


155 


— 


1 


3j 


n 


»» 


192 


— 


1 


3i 


24 


>» 


156 


1 


— 


3 


3 


a 


193 


— 


1 


3| 


3i 


born alive * 


157 


1 


— 


3i 


3 


» 


194 


— 


I 


3i 


34 


)) 


158 


1 


— 


3i 


H 


)) 


195 


1 


— 


H 


31 


}) 


159 


— 


1 


H 


n 


» 


196 


1 


— 


3| 


3i 


)) 


160 


— 


1 


2i 


2i 


>i 


197 


— 


1 


3i 


34 


n 


161 


1 1- 


3 


n 


» 


198 


1 


— 


3| 


3i 


tf 


162 


1 





3i 


3 


>» 


199 


— 


1 


3* 


3f 


it 


163 


^^ 


1 


3 


3 


» 


200 


— 


1 


3i 


34 




164 


1 


— 


H 


2| 


» 


201 


1 


— 


3i 


31 


9> 


165 


1 


— 


3 


2f 


» 


202 


1 


— 


4 


3f 


it 


166 


1 


— 


3 


3 


»> 


203 


1 


— 


3 


3i 


ft 


167 


— 


1 


3i 


31 


» 


204 


1 


— 


3» 


31 


99 


168 


— 1 


3 


3 


» 


205 


1 


— 


3i 


31 


)) 


169 


— 1 1 


3 


3 


» 


206 


— 


I 


3i 


3i 


)» 


170 


— ' 1 


2i 


2f 


» 


207 


1 


— 


3f 


3f 


» 


171 


1 — 


2i 


2i 


a 


208 


1 


— 


3* 


3| 


}) 


172 


1 ,- 


3 


2! 


» 


209 


1 


— 


34 


3» 


)) 


173 


1 ' — 


3* 


3 


» 


210 


1 


— 


3f 


34 


)) 


174 


1 — 


2i 


2| 


» 


211 


1 


— 


31 


3i 


)) 


175 


1 


— 


3 


2f 


» 


212 


1 


— 


3* 


3| 


)} 


176 


1 


— 


3 


2f 


»» 


213 


— 


1 


3i 


34 


}) 


177 


1 


— 


2* 


2i 


» 


214 


1 


— 


34 


31 


>} 


178 


— 


1 


2i 


2! 


» 


215 


1 


— 


34 


3f 


y) 


179 


— 


1 


2* 


2f 


» 


216 


— 


1 


34 


3| 


99 


180 


""" 


1 


3 


2i 


» 


217 


""~ 


1 


3« 


3i 


»> 



* As also all those up to No. 236 inclusive ; these and the two following 
dead-bom children, consequently from No. 193 to 238 inclusive, were 
measured in the Royal University Maternity Hospital. 



§ 84— a. VAULTING OF THE CHEST. 



47 



Original Measurements— Continued. 









Diameter 










DiftiTit^ttr 




No. 


1 


1 


of Thorax. 




No. 


i 


J 


of Thitriix. 




i 


1 


i 










1 


43 
5 










1 


1 




218 


__^ 


1 \z\ 


3f 


born alive 


229 




1 


3J 


born ftlive 


219 


— 


1 


4i 


31 


» 


230 


1 


— 


3| 


sl 




220 


1 


-|3^ 


3 


»> 


231 


— 


1 


3f 


3* 




221 


1 


-MM 


>> 


232 


— 


1 


31 


3} 




222 


1 


— 4 


3^ 


j» 


233 


— 


1 


3J 


3^ 




223 


I 


- 3J 


3 


»» 


234 


— 


1 


3* 


311 




224 


— 


1 


3* 


3i 


» 


235 


1 


— 


H 


3i 




225 


1 


— 


3* 


H 


>» 


236 


1 


— 


3i 


3i 




226 


____ 


1 


34 


H 


j» 


237 


1 


— 


n 


3 


born deAd 


227 


1 





31 


3i 


» 


238 


1 


— 


41 


3 


if 


228 


"~~ 


1 


31 


3i 


>» 















This Table, therefore, supplies the following numerical averages : 

Before Respiration. 

The transverse diameter of the thorax averaged 3f inches. 
The antero-posterior diameter „ „ 3 „ 

The maximum transverse diameter „ 4f „ 

The minimum transverse „ „ 3i „ 

The maximum antero-postrrior diameter „ 3 J „ 
The minimum antero-posterior „ ,, 2^ ,, 

After Respiration. 

The transverse diameter of the thorax averaged Z\ inches. 
The antero-posterior diameter „ „ ^ 

^le maximum transverse diameter „ 4| 

Iw minimum transverse „ „ 2f 

The maximum antero-posterior diameter „ 4J 
The minimum antero-posterior „ „ 2J 

When from these it is apparent in a most remarkable manner, that 
the thorax of those children bom dead had actually in the average a 
somewhat longer transverse diameter than that of those born alive, 
while the antero-posterior diameter of the latter is in the average 
longer than that of the former, though very inconsiderably so, when 
we find that the maximum and minimum deviations amount from 



48 I 85— ft. POSITION OF THE DIAPHRAGM. 

one-half to three-quarters of an inch, when, finally, we find in indi- 
vidual but frequent instances that the diameters, both before and after 
respiration, are perfectly alike, it is evident that the measurements of 
the chest, that is, that the vaulting of the thorax is of not the 
slightest diagnostic value. Elsasser has arrived at quite the same 
conclusions from the results of his measurements of the circumference 
of the thorax ;* from these I quote only the following convincing par- 
ticulars, in a series of fifty measurements undertaken on mature 
Uving children; the maximum and minimum were 13*5 and 9*9 
(Wirtemberg inches) — ^avery considerable difference, in eight mature 
stillborn children the maximum circumference of the thorax was 11*3 
inches, and the minimum 10*1 inches. E. says, '^it is irrefutable 
that the variations in the circumference of the thorax (and of course 
in its diameters) are so considerable, that no certain normal mean for 
a thorax that has breathed, and for one that has not breathed, can be 
laid down. In most cases the measurements of the thorax are 
incapable of determining whether the lungs contain air or not. The 
reason for these variations is, without doubt, to be referred to the 
congenital differences in the volume of the osseous thorax, partly also 
to the thickness of the soft parts, particularly of the subcutaneous 
fat and the thoracic muscles, partly also in the differences in the 
degree and amount of the dilatation of the thorax by respiration, with 
which the distention of the lungs also corresponds,'* &c. Founding 
upon these recent scientific results, the new Prussian Regulations 
(p. 86, Vol. I.) have very properly done away with the measuring 
of the thorax, as perfectly superfluous. 

§ 85. Continuation. — h. The Position of the Diaphragm. 

In considering this criterion as in that just treated of, I for the 
present abstain from any consideration of the objection s#frequently 
made against the docimasia pulmonaris, that the lungs may be dis- 
tended by artificial inflation, I shall recur to this part of the subject 
in § 92. This influence being abstracted, it is evident that the foetal 
position of the diaphragm must necessarily be higher than after 
respiration has taken place, and it is justifiable to take this into 
consideration when the diaphragm is found to be depressed. The 
position of the diaphragm is most easily ascertained, by making a 

♦ Op, cit, p. 11, Vol. III., 8. 6. 



§ 86— c. THE LIVER TEST. 49 

longitudinal incision through the skin and superficial cellular tissue, 
from the chin to the pubis, in the mesial line, dissecting these from 
the thorax on both sides, next carefully opening the abdominal 
cavity, introducing the finger of one hand into it, and pressing it up 
to the highest point of the concavity of the diaphragm, and then 
with one finger of the other hand reckoning off the intercostal spaces 
from above downwards till both fingers correspond. The rule is, 
that the highest point of the concavity of the diaphragm in children 
bom dead, is between the fourth and fifth ribs, and in those bom 
alive, between the fifth and sixth. Deviations from this rule are 
comparatively rare, therefore the position of the diaphragm is a good 
diagnostic sign. However, respiration of but a very transitory 
nature, which does not distend the lungs much, nor greatly increase 
the amount of blood contained in them, may circumscribe the proba- 
tive value of this symptom, and this is also the case where the dia- 
phragm is forced upwards into the thorax by considerable accumula- 
tions of gas in the stomach and intestines, which very readily happens ; 
and in this case the diaphragm, in children which have unquestionably 
breathed, may occupy a position quite as high as it did previous to 
respiration. The reverse of this also sometimes happens, where in 
children born dead the diaphragm occupies a lower position than it 
ought, from being forced downwards by the distention of the thorax 
with the gaseous products of putrefaction. 

§ 86. Continuation. — c. The Liver Test. 

I do not think it necessary at present to submit to an extended cri- 
ticism either the liver test itself, or the experiments of Bemt, Wild- 
berg, Tourtual, &c., which are not supported by any large experience, 
and which the absence of personal examination does not warrant me 
in criticising. All these tests have arisen from an unfounded idea of 
the deficiency of the ordinary dodmasia pulmonaris; they are all much 
too complicated to be practically useful, and the Prussian " Eegula- 
tions,'^ as well as the Austrian, have with great propriety completely 
ignored them. As to the liver test in particular, it is quite incom- 
prehensible how it should ever be proposed to base a so-called liver 
test upon the fact, that the liver commences to decrease in weight 
with the commencement of respiratory life, that consequently the 
weight of the liver must alter relatively to that of the rest of the 
body. If we consider on the one hand, that it is not possible for 

VOL. III. B 



50 § S7—d. VOLUME OF THE LUNGS. 

this alteration in the weight of the liver to be coincident with the 
first few breaths drawn^ but that it must at the most commence gra- 
dually with the continuance of respiration, and be only then evident and 
capable of being proved, when from the long continuance of the 
respiration there can be no difficulty in satisfactorily proving it by 
the ordinary docimana pulmonaris ; wherefore the liver test is in this 
respect superfluous. What, however, is superfluous in regard to the 
docimasia pulmonaris, is actually injurious and objectionable, since, 
as experience teaches, it only gives occasion to unfounded attacks and 
doubts on the part of our opponents. On the other hand, however, 
a test founded upon the weight of the liver ought to be banished from 
practice as uncertain, because it rests upon a fact, the weight of the 
liver, which is in itself extremely variable, and therefore incapable of 
affording any conclusions. When such careful observers as Bemt 
and Elsasser have found so great variations, the former in one 
hundred cases having found in the weight of the liver of those chil- 
dren bom dead a difference of from 3 oz. 8 drs. (imp.) to 7 oz. 8 
drs. (imp.), and in those that had respired perfectly, from 2 oz. 8 
drs. (imp.) to 9 oz. 8 drs. (imp.) ; the latter, in 65 cases of mature 
children bom dead, found a variation in the weight of the liver from 
2 oz. 12*8 drs. (imp.) to 9 oz. 2*4 drs. (imp.) ! ! and of rela- 
tive weight to the rest of the body from 1 : 44*47 to 1 : 34*77 : the 
liver test is thereby completely deprived of all confidence. Since the 
weights in those born alive and those bom dead resemble each other 
in their great variations ; and averages and relative weights do not 
improve the matter, for in every medico-legal case the individual 
by himself and not collectively is the object of investigation and of 
proof: therefore we are justified in stating tAat the liver ted is 
unworthy of the slightest consideration. 

§ 87. CoNTnajATioN. — d. Volume of the Lungs. 

It is well known, that after removal of the anterior wall of the 
chest, foetal lungs are found not to fill the cavity of the chest, and in 
particular the left lung is never found even partially covering the heart, 
whilst after respiration they fill the thorax all the more completely 
the more fully respiration has been established ; and in this case the 
lower lobes of the left lung cover almost the half of the pericardium. 
The foetal lungs are placed quite posteriorly, only occupy about one- 
third of tiie concavity of the ribs, and the first glance into the opened 



§ 88— c. COLOUR OF THE LUNGS. 51 

cavity, even when the divided ribs have only been partially separated, 
displays the anterior margins of the lungs projecting. The strong 
contrast between the foetal condition of the lungs, and that after 
respiration has been fully established, certainly makes the alteration 
in the volume of the lungs a very good diagnostic sign, particularly 
for an experienced eye ; but the medium condition between these two 
extremes, that consequent upon a short and imperfect respiration, 
may yet prove deceptive. In such a case, the lungs are frequently 
found retracted and deep-seated, and yet the result of the complete 
docimasia pulmonaris indubitably proves that the child has breathed. 

§ 88. CONTDOJATIGN. C. COLOUR OP THE LxJNGS. 

When we consider that the idea of colour is something quite 
individual, and how difficult it is to recall by a verbal description the 
colour impression received, particularly when it is mere shades of 
colour that are in question, we can understand the differences in the 
description of the colour of foetal lungs, and of lungs after respira- 
tion has been estabUshed, which are to be found in the various 
authors from the earliest times. Galen's description cannot be re- 
garded as correct, since it was taken from the lungs of animals. But 
in later times, and up to the most recent, we find the most manifold 
expressions employed, in order to portray the colours of these two 
kinds of lungs. I have, therefore, endeavoured to give additional 
certainty to the descriptions by drawings taken from nature. But 
even the remarkably correct drawings (Plate VI., Pigs. 15-18) are 
not nearly sufficient ; since twenty, thirty, or more drawings of each 
kind of lung would be required only in some measure to represent 
the extraordinary variety of shades of colour which occur in nature. 
Orfila and Billard are perfectly correct when they state, that the 
colour of the foetal lungs is " exceedingly various,^' and it betrays an 
amount of superficiality not usual in him, when Devergie on the 
other hand says, that their colour seemed to him always " very much 
the same/^ What is true of the foetal lungs, is true also of those 
which are no longer foetal. In general it is certainly true to nature 
to describe the colour of the lungs of a child born dead as reddish- 
brown liver-colour, becoming of a brighter red at the margins, 
because there the light acts differently through the thin walls. But 
it is by no means rare to find upon the lobes several bright red 
streaks or diffuse patches, whereby they come somewhat to Iresemble 

E 2 



52 { 88— c. COLOUR OF THE LUNGS. 

the lungs of those born alive. Moreover, the reddish-brown liver- 
colour is sometimes darker, resembling a concentrated water-chocolate, 
at others it appears much redder, like a mixture of wine lees and 
chocolate. In general it is also true to nature to describe the lungs 
of those children which have breathed, and which have not the 
slightest resemblance to the well-known slaty-grey marbled colour of 
the adult lung, as of a dark bluish-red ground-colour in which 
numerous bright red circumscribed patches are seen, while just as 
often the bright cinnabar-red prevails and forms the ground-colour in 
which the dark bluish-red insular patches are conspicuous. But it is 
specially, in lungs no longer foetal, that the greatest variety of 
hues occur. K any considerable amount of pulmonary hypersemia 
have either caused or accompanied the death, we then find the lungs 
to have a dark brownish-red colour resembling that of the liver, but 
with bright reddish patches, having even to the accustomed eye of 
an expert a most deceptive resemblance to the foetal lungs. TAe 
insular marbling described alone affords a certain diagnosis, for this 
is never found in perfectly foetal lungs, though it is doubtless only 
feebly marked in those cases in which the child has been as it were 
bom into fluids (as in a privy), and suffocated at once after one or two 
respiratory movements. The colour of the lungs is perfectly different 
in those children bom dead, and which have been subsequently 
artificially inflated, in those putrid, or anaemic after death from 
haemorrhage. I have inflated the foetal lungs a countless number of 
times, and of course perfectly successfully, by introducing a pipe into 
the trachea and blowing through it. In every case of perfectly suc- 
cessful inflation of the lungs, without exception, the lungs imme- 
mediately swell up, become spongy, and assume a bright cinnabar- or 
bright crab-red colour, which is extended vrnformh/ over all the 
pulmonary tissue, by uniformly, I mean without any insular mar- 
blings. The representation, Plate VI., Fig. 15, exhibits just such 
an inflated foetal lung as one may find exactly reproduced in nature 
by experimenting on the first most suitable body of a stillborn child 
that may come to hand.* The colour of the lung just commencing 

* Maschka (Prager Vierteljahrschr. 54 Bd. 1867, s. 35) asserts that when 
the air is blown in very slowly, without the employment of any force, and 
in but a small quantity, that then the insular marbling will '< not always*' 
be tbund wanting. Certainly in such a mode of experimenting, portions of 
the lungs remain of their foetal colour, and this contrasted with the bright 
cinnabar-red of the inflated portions, makes the lungs appear mottled. But 



§ 89—/ CONSISTENCY OF THE LUNG TISSUE. 53 

to putrefy is not materially altered, only somewhat more livid and 
dirty-looking ; when the lungs are j^r advanced in putrefaction, their 
colour is constantly the same, blackish, or even quite black, not like 
ink or charcoal, but like very dark blood that has been long exposed 
to the air. - Such a lung cannot, therefore, be confounded with one 
in any other condition. In newborn children who have died from 
hsemorrhage, the lungs appear pale and of a reddish-grey, with a 
few bluish-black marblings scattered through this pale ground- 
colour, which is also in itself diagnostically not to be mistaken. I 
have endeavoured, without entering into minutiae, which are only apt 
to mislead, to describe the colours of the various kinds of lung which 
are found in newborn children from my own very numerous observa- 
tions. The result obtained is, that it is consistent with experience, 
that every insular marhlmg of the lung excludes the idea of a foetal 
condition, and entitles us to assume as certain the fact of the child 
having lived after its birth; but that we are not entitled to draw this 
conclusion in the absence of this insular marbling from the ground- 
colour of the lungs alortCy and the other positive and negative means 
of evidence supplied by the docimasiajmlmonarismusi be resorted to 
as supplementary proof. 

§ 89. Continuation.—/. Consistency of the Pulmonaey Tissue. 
— Atelectasis. — Hyperemia. — Hepatization. 

The difiFerence between the consistence of the foetal lung and the 
pulmonary parenchyma after respiration has been established, is so 
great, that it is scarcely possible to confound the two extremes in 
distinct cases. The one is compact, feels resistent when pressed on 
by the finger, which readily slips oflf from the moisture of the organs^ 
and may be actually termed like the liver in consistence, and not 
merely in colour. The other, the tissue of lungs that have respired, 
is, on the other hand, crepitant, spongy, and yielding to the pressure 
of the finger. But here are also intermediate conditions on the one 
hand, and pathological conditions on the other, which cause the 
sharply-defined differences of individual cases to disappear. To these, 
in the first place, belong those common cases in which respiration 

this is not what I have termed, for want of a better expression, " an insular 
marbling/* in which the two ooloars are as it were washed into one another. 
On the body the difference is at once readily observed, though it is not so 
easy to describe it in words. 



54 § 89—/. CONSISTENCY OF THE LUNG TISSUE. 

has not been completely established, and in which, therefore, there 
are portions of the Inngs into which the air has not passed, which 
have remained foetal, — a condition which has been named atelectasis 
pulnumum by Legendre and Jorg, jnnr.^ The opinion which 
would elevate this atelectasis into a peculiar "disease " of the new-bom 
child, which kills it by interfering with its respiration, cannot for one 
moment be justified. Except where this condition has been, as we shall 
by-and-by show, confounded with hepatisation, it is nothing else than 
the original foetal condition, from which it differs in no anatomical 
respect, and the case is rather the reverse of the above : the child 
dies from any given cause, before the whole of the lung has been 
able to pass from the foetal to the post-foetal condition, because the 
respiration has not had time to become fully established. This so- 
called atelectasis, which according to this view is only another name 
for the foetal condition of the lung, is therefore not a cause, but 
rather as it were an effect of death. From this also it appears, that 
it is perfectly absurd to employ this so-called atelectasic condition of 
the lungs as an objection to the docimasia pulmonaris. Are the 
lungs " atelectasic,^' and therefore brownish-red, compact, sinking in 
water, &c. ? the child has just never lived ! Are the lungs only 
partially atelectasic (foetal) ? then there has been imperfect respiration, 
which will be readily recognised by careftdly carrying out the doci- 
masia pulmonaris. For this so-called atelectasis occurs in various 
degrees and over a varying extent of the lungs. This cannot be 
better described than has been done by Elsasser in the following 
words: t — " When the amount of foetal tissue in the lung is lobar in 
its nature, that is, when it occupies an entire lobe, or a large con- 
tinuous portion extending throughout the entire thickness, or at 
least a considerable proportion of the entire thickness of a lobe, then 
the separation between it and the tissue containing air is generally 
well defined and easily seen. But usually the foetal tissue is only 
lobular in its character, that is, there are small patches of foetal 
tissue corresponding to one or two lobules scattered in the most 
manifold manner throughout the rest of the pulmonary substance, 
sometimes running superficially in lines along the posterior surface " 
(but also on the anterior surface) " of the lungs, and dipping into 
their substance to the extent of from half a line to a whole line, at 

* Legendre, Krankheiten des kindlichen Alters. A. d. I*ranz. Berlin, 1847. 
Ed. Jorg, Fotuslunge im gebornen Einde. Grimma, 1835. 
+ Op. cit.f s. 22. 



§ 89—/. CONSISTENCY OF THE LUNG TISSUE. 55 

others, strewn irregularly throughout the deeper portions of the 
lungs " (which is most commonly the case). ^^ If these foetal insular 
patches are very sm^all but present in large numbers, and if the por- 
tion of the tissue containing air contains^ any considerable amount of 
fluid secretion, and is of a somewhat dark colour, it is often very 
difScult, without applying the hydrostatic test to every little portion 
of tissue, to decide regarding the presence and extent of the foetal 
tissue. The sense of feeling is in such a case not sufScient to decide 
the matter, since by the mixture of very small insular patches of 
foetal and air-containing tissue, a mixed sensation is imparted, that is, 
the part aflfected is somewhat denser than air-containing lung, and 
somewhat less dense than foetal pulmonary tissue ; neither does it 
distinctly crepitate on pressure, nor upon incision/^ 

The pathological conditions, which may alter the condition of the 
pulmonary tissue, and thus possibly lead to mistakes, are suffocatory 
hypersemia and the results of pneumonia. In such a congested con- 
dition of the lungs their colour is dark, approaching that of the foetal 
lung (p. 51, Vol. III.), and their tissue is also more compact, they 
(sometimes only one, the hypersemic one) do not crepitate, but are, 
nevertheless, more yielding to pressure than foetal lungs, and ^ene- 
rally capable of floating. The red and grey hepatisation (splenisa- 
tion), on the other hand, are characterized by a dirty violet-red 
colour, by a britileness of tissue, which is easily torn, and finally, by 
the presence of fibrinous or albuminous exudation in the pulmonary 
cells. On incising the hepatised tissue no bloody froth flows out, 
and it is not easy to press any out, but both bloody SOTum and also 
a tough albuminous mucus exude in small specks or drops upon the cut 
surface. A very little experience will prevent anyone from easily 
confounding the different appearances in the lungs here described. 
And, yet in many cases, where there was not merely a foetal condition 
of the lung present, the actual result of a pneumonia has been declared 
to be atelectasis I ^ Moreover, Legendre himself says, he has some- 
times (?)'had occasion to observe a foetal condition of the lung 
^'combined" with hepatisation, and Jorg supposes that pulmonary 

* The more ancient oases are oompletely untrustworthy. They date from 
a time when histology, the docrine of the phenomena of putrescence, of 
pneumonia and its results, &c., were yet in their infancy. The longer in 
any of these cases the children have lived, and it was not merely days, but 
even weeks (fifteen days in the case reported by Eemer), so much the more 
probable is it that pneumonia has been the cause of death. 



56 $ 90-^. PLOUCQUETS TEST. 

inflammation ^^ usually'' precedes the death of children born with 
atelectasic longs. And now I beg of all practical men to read 
Legendre^s prolix description of the differential diagnosis between his 
atelectasis and hepatisation {pp. cit. s. 85^ &c.)^ and I am sure they 
will agree with me that the condition there described has no exist- 
ence^ and that the so-called atelectasis is a mere word without a/ny 
real signification, since it has been employed to designate pulmonary 
tissue at one time merely in a foetal condition^ and at others in a 
state of hepatisation or splenisation. 

§90. Continuation. — -g. Weight of the Lungs and Heaet. 
— PLOucquET's Test. 

There is no more important question in the whole range of 
forensic medicine, in which, as I shall point out, more errors, useless 
discussions, and, what is of more importance, more serious practical 
consequences have followed the customary fashion in our science of 
one author quoting another without first submitting his quotation 
to the touchstone of his own personal observation and experience, or, 
since so few have an opportunity of acquiring the latter, without 
even submitting it to a literary criticism. W. G. Ploucquef s rightly- 
valued name, and his h, priori^ just as properly recognised as well- 
founded supposition, that the lungs of newborn children must 
increase in absolute weight from the larger amount of blood which 
would flow into them, finally, his '' observation on the bodies of 
children'' — What a sentence to employ ! — have, as is well known, 
occasioned his proposition to compare the absolute weight of the 
lungs (with and without the heart) with the absolute weight of the 
whole body, as a means of determining whether the child has lived 
or not, to be generally received with great welcome. These circum- 
stances have occasioned " Ploucquef s tesf to be added as a new 
criterion to the well-known customary docimasia pulmonaria, and 
that the numerical relations given by Ploucquet from his " observa- 
tions '^ of 1 : 70 for children bom dead, and 2 : 70 for those bom 
alive, have been* generally received as at least approximately correct 
proportional averages down to the most recent times, till at length 
those who observed for themselves, objected to them as incorrect. 
Indeed even Ploucquet's hope "that his lung-test would one day 
command public attention^' was completely fulfilled, and so it is not 
to be wondered that the famous numerical proportions of 1 : 70 and 
2:70 have passed from one handbook to another down to the most 



§ 90—^. PLOUCQUET'S TEST. 57 

recent, and are continually quoted by everybody. I will now pro- 
ceed to show what connection these have with Ploucquet'syacfo, and 
with his "observations/' and for this purpose I shall go at once to 
the fountain-head, and give the exact words of the discoverer 
himself,* in his '^ Abhandlung uber die gewalUame Todesarten. 
Ah ein BeUrag zur medicinischen Rechtsgelehrtheit*^ or Treatise 
upon the various kinds of violent death, A contribution to Forensic 
Medicine y second edition, translated from the Latin. Tubingen, 1788, 
p. 314. Ploucquet goes on to say : " In this manner (by weighing) 
is obtained the true relative proportions of the weight of the body to 
that of those lungs which have respired, and also of those which 
have not respired. This much at least I have learned from, three 
observations^* (mark — ^from thsse observations!), "which I shall 
proceed to quote, in which the proportions were the following : the 
body of a newborn male chUd, which had exhibited evident signs of 
life a few hours before its birth, but which having died in the birth 
had certainly never respired, weighed, along with the lungs, 53*040 
grs. The dense, collapsed or rather not yet distended lungs weighed 
by themselves 792 grs., so that the proportion borne by body, in- 
cluding the lungs, to the lungs alone, amounted to almost 67 ; 1. 
In another mature, perfect foetus, which however had never breathed, 
the proportion of the weight of the body to that of the lungs was as 
70 : 1, (S. Jaeger, Diss, de fcetibus recens natis, etc. histor, §12.) 
In another foetus, which though not perfect*' (mature) "had yet 
breathed, the proportion of the weight of the body to that of the 
lungs was 70:2. Prom this it is evident (!), that the weight of the 
lungs has been doubled by the amount of blood forced into them by 
respiration and remaining in them after death, and that it may be 
possible in doubtful cases to decide from this whether the child has 
breathed or no. For instance, if we know from experiment that the 
proportional weight of the lungs to the entire body is as 1 : 70, then 
the child has certainly never breathed; but should the relative pro- 
portion be somewhere about 2 : 70 or even as 1 : 36, then we may be 
certain {sic! I) that the child has breathed.^' 

And has a new " lung-tesf been admitted into science, medicine, 
and practice upon a basis like this ! Three cases, of which it is 
certain that one of them was not investigated by Ploucquet himself, 
while it is very doubtful whether this was not also the case with the 

* I quote from the German translation, because I have not the Latin 
original at hand. 



58 



5 90—^. PLOUCQUET'S TEST. 



other two ! Moreover, Ploucquet immediately drops the first case 
entirely, and not a word more is said of 1 : 67, the relative proportion 
discovered. So that of "Ploucquef s observations'' all that remain 
is only two, that is one child bom dead and one bom alive, which are 
compared the one with the other, and over and above the comparison 
is not made between two equals, for the deadbom child was ^' per- 
fect'' (that is> as is well known, mature), but the one bom ailive 
was a " not perfect" foetus ! I 

It is just as certain that a single case can give no rule, as that it 
must have been miraculous had the relative proportion deduced from 
it been accidentally coincident with that obtained by an average. 
Experience, and the numerous results obtained by more recent and 
more exact observers, are far from confirming this miracle. In the 
following Table I have given the weights (in Prussian drachms = 2 
drs. imp.) of the heart and of the lungs, with the relative proportion 
to the weight of the entire body in twenty-six cases of newborn 
children, born dead, and in sixty-three of those born alive, all taken 
from my official protocols of the various dissections. I regret that 
I have not collected the notices of a much larger number from earUer 
years : nevertheless the conclusions arrived at in this Table are in- 
dependently confirmed in the most conclusive manner by our own 
investigations as well as by those of others. 

Peopoktion bobne by the Weight op the Lttngs to that op the whole 
Body, in Eighty-nine Cases op New-boen Children. 

Children horn Dead. 







h 


1 


1. 










1 


1 


1 






1 


1 


11 


"5 8, 


KaUo. 


Remarks. 


1 


1 


•91 




ft 


Ratio. 


Remarks. 






« 


^ 


^ 










? 


^ 


^ 










^ 










14 




^ 










1 


F 


992 


9 


27 


1:37 


_ 


M 


1280 


8 


23 


1 :56 




2 


M 


768 


6 


12 




62 


putrid 


15 


F 


480 


4 


7 


1:68 


putrid 


3 


F 


960 


8 


16 




60 


— 


16 


F 


576 


7 


8 


1:64 


__ 


4 


F 


896 


7 


16 




56 


— 


17 


F 


768 


5 


8 


1 :96 


putrid 


5 


M 


640 


6 


14 




46 


— 


18 


M 


1024 


7 


13 


1:78 


__ 


6 


F 


800 


7 


11 




73 


— 


19 


F 


768 


9 


14 


1:55 





7 


F 


480 


4 


8 




60 


putrid 


20 


F 


800 


5 


11 


1:73 





8 


M 


640 


4 


12 




53 


— 


21 


M 


672 


4 


12 


1:56 





9 


M 


1280 


8 


23 




56 


— 


22 


M 


768 


4 


8 


1 : 96 


__ 


10 


F 


480 


4 


8 




60 


8 mo. child 


23 


F 


896 


6 


16 


1:56 





11 


F 


512 


8 


18 




29 


99 


24 


M 


768 


6 


13 


1 :59 


___ 


12 


M 


480 


5 


10 




48 


» 


25 


F 


832 


9 


12 


1:69 


__ 


13 


M 


384 


4 


8 




48 


»> 


26 


M 


960 


8 


14 


1 :69 


— 



§ 90-^. PLOUCQUETS TEST. 



59 



Weights, btc.^ Continued, 

















Children horn Alive, 
















I 


1 


1 






j 




1, 

•^1 


1 


1 








i 


1 


i 


ii 


P 


Batto. 


Caiue of Death. 


6 


1 


H 




Batto. 


Cause of Death. 








^ 


8 


^ 






40 




^ 


^ 


16 








1 


F 


844 


16 


1:53 


drowned 


M 


960 


4 


1:60 


? 




2 


M 


784 


6 


10 


1:78 


hemorrhage 


41 


F 


704 


6 


12 


1:59 


drowned 




a 


F 


868 


8 


18 


1:48 


apoplexy 


42 


M 


832 


5 


13 


1:64 


apoplexy 




4 


F 


896 


4 


14 


1:64 


» 


43 


M 


992 


6 


10 


1:99 


)) 




5 


F 


768 


8 


12 


1:64 


» 


44 


M 


1056 


9 


31 


1:34 


pulmonary 




6 


M 


1024 


8 


18 


1:57 


» 














apoplexy 




7 


F 


768 


8 


24 


1:32 


sulTocation 


45 


F 


896 


5 


12 


1:75 


if 




8 


M 


992 


8 


16 


1:62 


apoplexy 


46 


M 


1024 


6 


15 


1 :68 


cranial in- 




9 


M 


1024 


10 


22 


1:46 


»> 


^ 












jury 




10 


F 


784 


6 


16 


1:49 


>» 


47 


M 


768 


6 


13 


1:59 


? 




11 


M 


896 


8 


16 


1:56 


» 


48 


F 


672 


4 


10 


1:67 


fall at its 




12 


F 


1024 


6 


16 


1:64 


»> 














birth 




13 


F 


1024 


8 


18 


1:57 


}i 


49 


M 


896 


8 


16 


1:56 


pulmonary 




14 


M 


736 


6 


13 


1:56 


a 














and cere- 




15 


F 


864 


8 


16 


1:54 


91 














bral apo- 




16 


F 


768 


6 


14 


1:55 


»» 














plexy 




17 


F 


896 


6 


16 


1:56 


>» 


50 


F 


896 


6 


12 


1:75 


cranial in- 




18 


M 


832 


8 


14 


1:59 


91 














jury 




19 


M 


896 


7 


15 


1:59 


11 


51 


F 


960 


6 


14 


1:69 


pulmonary 




20 
21 


M 
M 


1280 
896 


9 

7 


20 
14 


1:64 
1:64 


It 

11 


52 


F 


832 


6 


13 


1:64 


apoplexy 
cranial in- 




22 


M 


992 


8 


16 


1 :62 


11 














jury 




23 


F 


1120 


7 


18 


1:62 


11 


53 


F 


832 


12 


16 


1:52 


drowned in 




24 


M 


832 


9 


16 


1:52 


11 














a privy 




25 


M 


960 


8 


15 


1:64 


11 


54 


M 


768 


6 


16 


1:48 


suffocation 




26 


F 


912 


8 


19 


1:48 


11 


55 


M 


928 


5 


14 


1 :66 


? 




27 


F 


832 


6 


22 


1:38 


11 


66 


F 


896 


7 


16 


1 :56 


drowned in 




28 


F 


864 


6 


13 


1:66 


11 














a privy 




29 


M 


800 


4 


15 


1:53 


11 


57 


F 


1088 


10 


18 


1:60 


suffocation 




30 


F 


896 


6 


10 


1:89 


11 


58 


F 


896 


7 


16 


1:56 


11 




31 


M 


896 


6 


12 


1:74 


suffocation 


59 


F 


736 


6 


14 


1:53 


drowned in 




32 


M 


864 


5 


15 


1:57 
















a privy 




33 


F 


992 


8 


16 


1:62 




60 


M 


896 


8 


19 


1:47 


drowned in 




34 


M 


1120 


7 


18 


1:62 
















broth 




35 


F 


832 


6 


16 


1:52 


> ? 


61 


F 


704 


7 


11 


1:64 


cardiac apo- 




J6 


F 


832 


8 


20 


1 :41 
















plexy 




57 


F 


864 


4 


13 


1:66 




62 


F 


960 


8 


22 


1:44 


drowned in 




^ 


M 


800 


5 


15 


1:53 
















urine 




J9 F 


896 


7 


10 


1:89 


/ 


63 M 


1152 


9 


18 


1:60 


apoplexy* 



* The original weights in this Table are retained, the ratio being the im- 
portant point : — 1 Prussian draohm = to 2 draohms imperial. 



60 § 90-^. PLOUCQUET'S TEST. 

The following are the results obtained from this Table, excluding 
in each case those children bom putrid or in the eighth month : — 
The ratio of the weight of the lunga to that of the body was— 
In those children bom dead - - - 1 : 61 
In those children bom alive - - - 1 : 59 
The relative variations in the weights were quite remarkable. 
They were — 

In those children bom dead, rruix. 1 : 37 ; min. 1 : 96 
In those children bom alive, max. 1 : 32 ; min. 1 : 99 
As to ahaolute weight — 
The lungs of those children bom dead weighed on the average 14i 

Prussian drachms. 
The lungs of those children bom dead weighed on the average 15 1 
Prussian drachms. 
The absolute weight of the lungs varied^ — 
In those children bom dead, from a minimum of 8 Prussian drachms 

to a maximum of 27 Prussian drachms. 
In those children bom alive, from a minimum of 10 Prussian drachms 
to a maximnm of 31 Prussian drachms. 
The average weight of the heart was — 

In those bom dead . . 7 Prussian drachms. 
In those bom alive - - 7 „ „ 

The weight of the heart varied — 
In those children bom dead, from a minimum of 4 Prussian drachms 

to a maximum of 9 Prassian drachms. 
In those children born alive, from a minimum of 4 Prussian drachms 
to a maximum of 12 Prussian drachms. 
Such facts as these speak for themselves and require no commen- 
tary! Other observers have obtained precisely similar results. 
Schmitt* found, in respect of Ploucquet^s numerical proportion, 
in the case of twenty-two children bom dead, an average (not of 
1 : 70, but) of 1 : 52*27 with fluctuations of from 1 : 15*21 in 
maximum to 1 : 83 in minimum, Devergie,t who has very judici- 
ously reduced a large proportion of the cases published by Chaussier 
and Lecieux to their true value, found in the case of thirty-three 
children bom dead an average of 1 : 60 with a maximum of 1 : 24 
and a minimum of 1 : 94 : in nineteen cases of children that had 

♦ Neue Versuche und Erfahrungen uber die Plouoq. u. hydrostatisolie 
Lungenprobe. "Wien, 1806. 
t Op. cit. 8. 557. 



§ 90-^. PLOUCQUErS TEST. 



61 



lived from a few minutes up to twenty-four hours, an average of 
1 : 45, and fluctuations of from 1 : 80 in maximtm to 1 : 132 in 
minimum. In seventy-two cases of children bom dead, Elsasser* 
found the lungs to weigh on an average of 13*06 Pruss. drs.;^ 
with fluctuations of from 7 Pruss. drs. to 20*5 Pruss. drs., and their 
average ratio to the weight of the body was 1 : 67*13 with a mood- 
mum of 1 : 44}*63 and a minimum of 1 : 96*13. In nine children who 
died on the first day the average weight of the lungs was 11*18 
Pruss, drs., with a maximnm of 18*13 and a minimum of 5*40, and 
relative proportion was 1 : 55*98, with a maximum of 1 : 35*31 and a 
minimum of 1 : 109*82. — In eight cases of children bom aUve Professor 
V. Sampson-Himmelsstiern in Dorpatf found that the ratio obtained 
by the application of Ploucquefs test fluctuated from 1 : 27i? to 
1 : 675?. — ^The following Table brings these results concisely before 
the reader's eye : — 

Ratio of the Weight of the F<etal and Post-fcbtal Lungs to that of 

THE Body. 





CbUdren bom Dead. 


1 


ATerage. 1 Maximum. 




Arenge. 


Mtueimmm. 


Uinimum. 


Sohmitt 

Devergie- - - 

Elsasser 

Samson - - - 
Casper- - - - 


1 : 52-27 
1:60 
1 : 67-13 

1:61 


1 : 15-21 
1:24 
1 : 44-63 

1:37 


1:83 
1:94 
1 : 96-13 

1:96 


1:45 
1 : 55-98 

1:59 


1:30 
1 : 35-31 
l:27-» 
1:32 


1:132 
1:109-82 
1:67J? 
1:99 


Mean of totals 


1 : 6010 


1 : 3010 


1 : 92-28 


1 : 53-32 


1 : 3M4 


1:100-27 



By chance, therefore, it has happened that neither Ploucquet's single 
deadbom child, nor his svngh livingborn one have hit the average of 
ratio I We are now in a position to estimate more correctly from a 
large series of observations the numerical value of the h priori per- 
fectly correct supposition of the increase of weight of the lungs 
subsequent to the establishment of respiration, and from the 
summary given above we learn this does not amoimt to the double 
of what was their foetal weight, as Ploucquet assumed to be '^certam,'' 
but only to the comparatively trifling pirns expressed by the ratio of 

♦ Op. cit. s. 93. 

t Beitrage (rigaisoher Aerzte) zor Heilkunde. iii. 3. Riga, 1855. s. 228. 



62 § 91— h, THE HYDROSTATIC TEST. 

1 : 53 compared with that of 1 : 60. Moreover, the very considerable 
maximum and minimum fluctuations render this plus utterly useless 
practically, and the numerical ratios of 1 : 58 and 1 : 60 would if 
applied to any given case be just as false and untenable as Plouc- 
quef s ratios of 1 : 70 and 2:70, since any given body of a child in 
respect of the relative weight of its lungs may range anywhere 
between the maximum and minimum extremes. Nothing, moreover, 
is more easily explicable than the fluctuations thus ascertained. In 
producing these the most decided influence is exerted by — the 
manifold individual peculiarities of a newborn child, which may in 
one case weigh 6, in another 7 or 8 pounds or even more, the 
amount of putrefaction present where the body is brought' under 
observation, which produces as it advances a gradual decrease in the 
weight of the body, while the lungs are only in a very limited degree 
afiected by the process of putrefactive evaporation ; and finally, the 
various kinds of death by which the children have perished of itself 
exercises a most important influence upon this ratio. In this respect, 
I will only call to mind the two extremes of sufFocatory or pneu- 
monic hypersemia of the lungs, and their ansemic condition after 
death from hsemorrhage. In one such case included in the Table the 
absolute weight of the lungs only amounted to 10 Prussian drs. (20 
drs. imp.), while in another not included, but already detailed (§ 22, 
p. 8, Vol. II.) case of haemorrhage from cutting the cervical vessels, 
they weighed only 7 Pruss. drs. (14 drs. imp.). Prom all that we 
have just said, it is evident that Ploucquet^s lung-test has no scien- 
tific basis in fact, but only rests upon the observation of one single 
isolated case of each character, and upon a supposition based upon 
these, that, therefore, it is of no more value than any other ^ priori 
supposition of any given author; that its practical application can 
only give rise to errors and false conclusions, and ther^ore it ought to 
be at once and for ever struck out of the list of means employed to 
prove that respiration has existed.^ 

§ 91. Continuation. — h. The Ploating op the Lungs. The 
Hydrostatic Test. 

In the usual order of succession in which each separate investiga- 

* Since the above was written, the new Prussian "Regulations" (vide 
p. 86, Yol. I.) have altogether omitted this lung-test. May this example be 
speedily followed by the medical institutions of all countries ! 



§ 91— A. THE HYDROSTATIC TEST. 63 

tion is made at the medico-legal examination of the body of a child, 
the well-known hydrostatic test follows next, against which chiefly 
opposing sceptics have urged their objections. That a lung con- 
taining air is specifically lighter than water, and a foetal one specifi- 
cally heavier; that, therefore, the former must float in water, and the 
latter sink, has never been disputed, but it has been denied that the 
floating of the lungs proves that they have been filled with atmo- 
spheric air, or that their sinking proves their foetal condition. In 
the first place as to their floating, this may be variously modified. 
Both of the lungs with the heart and thymus gland still attached may 
float perfectly, so that when placed in the water they rest upon the 
surface, and when forcibly depressed they rise immediately to the 
surface again. In such cases as these of course the lungs when 
subsequently separated from the heart float quite as perfectly. At 
other times the lungs with the heart and thymus gland display a 
tendency to sink, but still continue suspended in the upper layers 
of the fluid, and only float freely when they have been separated from 
the heart which weighed them down. Or the lungs and heart may 
sink either rapidly and at once or slowly and gradually to the bottom 
of the vessel — ^these differences depending in each case upon the 
greater or less completeness with which the pulmonary tissue is per- 
meated by the air. Every variety in this respect giving rise to mani- 
fold peculiarities in regard to the buoyancy of the lungs. It may 
happen that only one lung floats, and this is most commonly the 
right, because its bronchus is shorter and wider than that of the left 
lung which sinks ; though I have also observed cases in which it was 
the left lung alone which floated {vide Cases (XJCLIX., CCCLXI., and 
CCCXCIX). Or only single lobes may float while all the rest sink. 
Or finally, where the air has been only very partially admitted into 
the pulmonary tissue, only a few of those pieces into which the lung 
has been and must be divided in order fully and accurately to test 
the degree of its buoyancy* may float. In regard to the mode of 
instituthig this experiment, I have only to remark, besides referring 
to the statutory procedure ordained in the ''Eegulations^' (p. 92, 
Vol. I.), that the vessel employed must be at least one foot in depth, 
eight or ten inches in diameter, and filled with pure cold water. 
Devergie has recommended the institution of a counterproof with warm 

♦ In regard to the question, Whether any air which may be contained in 
the lungs may be forced out by pressure ? vide § 92, p. 54, Vol. III. 



64 § 92— a. ARTIFICIAL INFILTRATION. 

water; but the reasons he has adduced for this recommendation are 
not convincing enough to make it of any value. 

The many objections which have been so often urged against the 
probative value of the hydrostatic test are based upon the following 
assertions, 1st, that the lungs of a child bom dead may contain an 
amount of air sufficient to make them specifically lighter than water, 
and thus render them capable of floating : a, from artificial inflation 
of the dead foetal lungs ; p, from the spontaneous development of an 
interstitial or vesicular emphysema in such lungs, and 7, from the 
development of the gaseous products of putrefaction within their 
parenchyma, by which the lungs may be rendered wholly or partially 
buoyant in water. 2nd, on the other hand, it has been alleged, that 
lungs which have evidently breathed may yet sink completely in 
water. In regard to these objections I shall now, as always, proceed 
to relate, without prejudice, and with a steady eye to the requirements 
of actual practice, what have been the constant results obtained 
during many years of repeated experiment, observation, and experi- 
ence in a medico-legal practice, which has brought before me instances 
of the rarest complication. 

§ 92. — a. Artipicial Inflation. 

The lungs may be artificially inflated in various ways, and the 
degree of success, attained depends upon the method selected. It 
may be performed either before or after the opening of the thoracic 
and abdominal cavities ; in the natural position of the viscera or after 
these have been removed from the body ; with or without instru- 
mental assistance. Nothing is easier — and this may be at any time 
ascertained — than to inflate foetal lungs removed from the body, in 
the most perfect manner throughout all their cells, by blowing 
through a tube inserted in the trachea (in doing which, however, care 
must be taken not to rupture a whole mass of cells by too forcible 
inflation, and then produce a violent, instantaneous, and very visible 
emphysema!). The lungs immediately dilate and become spongy, 
instead of their previous brownish-red liver colour they at once (§88) 
assume a most remarkable bright einnabar- or crab-red colov/r, without 
however any trace of mottling. In the very many experiments of 
this character which I have made and still make, I have never 
observed any other colour, even when the lungs have been inflated in 
situ, but after the thorax had been opened, either by means of a 



§ 92— «. ARTIFICIAL INFLATION. 65 

blowpipe inserted in the trachea, or by the application of the month 
direct to the child's month, and I cannot comprehend how there 
shonld be so much difference of opinion in regard to the colour of 
artificially inflated lungs. The representation, Plate VI., Fig. 15, 
exhibits as true to nature as possible a preparation in which, after the 
right bronchus was firmly tied, the left lung was inflated by means of 
a tube inserted in the trachea, so that the colours of the foetal lung 
and of a lung artificially inflated are here contrasted. This experi- 
ment is much less easily performed when, without opening the thorax, 
a tube is attempted to be inserted either through the mouth or 
through the nostrils beneath the epiglottis, for the purpose of inflating 
the lungs. It generally happens in this case, even to an experienced 
person, to say nothing of an inexperienced one^ that even when the body 
is placed in a favourable position, the oesophagus and not the trachea 
is hit upon, and the abdomen is suddenly seen to dilate, a certain 
proof that not the lungs but the stomach and intestines have been 
inflated ; and these are in fact, on subsequently opening the body, 
found to be Jllled with air to an amount never witnessed in children 
born dead, even after the commencement of putrefaction. It is much 
more difficult to inflate the lungs without instrumental assistance or 
any artiflcial procedure, merely by blowing from mouth to mouth, 
closing the child's nose, or by blowing through the nose, closing the 
child's mouth, and it is certainly extremely rare thus to inflate them 
to any considerable extent. It is also of very little importance as to 
the result, whether pressure be made on the r^on of the stomach or 
not. I cannot blame my own unskilfulness when I confess thus to 
have inflated the stomach and intestines, and not the lungs, in by far 
the larger proportion of cases. Elsasser, who has experimented so 
often, so carefully and in so many various ways, confesses,* ''that in 
forty-five experiments performed on children born dead, without 
opening their thorax and abdomen, only one was attended with com- 
plete success, thirty-four with partial success, and ten with none 
whatever; and it must also," he continues, ''be remembered that 
these experiments were conducted without disturbance and with the 
greatest care." And yet it cannot be controverted that the latter 
method alone, which I may call the natural mode of inflation, mouth 
to mouth or mouth to nose, is the only one that has any relation to 
medico-legal practice, and not the blowpipe, the opened thorax, or 

♦ Op. dt, 8. 80. 
VOL. in. p 



66 § 92.-«. ARTIFICIAL INFLATION. 

the exenterated lungs ! Since then even a partial inflation of the 
lungs with air presupposes in every case anatomical knowledge, 
practice and dexterity, care and the absence of any disturbing 
element, we are forced to inquire : In whom such conditions are 
likely to be found conjoined in those cases which in practice are 
found as a rule to be the sole objects of this docimasia pulmonaris ? 
that is, in the case of children bom in secrecy and privacy which are 
dead when first discovered, and concerning whose life and death all 
is uncertainty. Certainly not in the mother, who truly — even if she 
were an expert — could have no interest in seeking to recall to life her 
child already dead or believed to be so, because in such a case she 
would not mangle it, hide it in the earth, or fling it from her into 
the water ! Perhaps, however, a physician or a midwife in some 
individual case has subsequently appeared and attempted to resus- 
citate the child supposed to be only apparently dead ? Such cases are, 
however, so uncommonly rare, that only five, which I shall presently 
relate (Cases CCCLXII. — CCCLXVI.), have occurred in my own 
practice, and I have never observed one single case of this character 
in all the documentary evidence that has come before me, for the 
purpose of obtaining a superarbMum during the course of thirty- 
four years ; and even in these extremely rare cases an inquiry into the 
facts will at once reveal when, by whom, and under what circum- 
stances the lungs have been inflated ! Would it not, however, be 
possible by an investigation of the case to answer the question: 
Whether the air present in the lungs has been introduced by natural 
respiration or by artificial inflation? I confess that it may be 
difficult to answer this query, particularly when but a few inspira- 
tions have actually been made, and air has then been blown in 
without much effect. In regard to these cases I perfectly agree with 
Elsasser's"'^ refutation of the numerous diagnostic signs which have 
been proposed, particularly in recent times by Weber, Tourtual, and 
Bloxum. Neither the amount of distention of the thorax nor of the 
lungs, nor their colour, nor still less their weight — always fallacious 
— nor the amount of crepitation present, nor their buoyancy, can 
suffice to solve the doubt — which nevertheless, I repeat, in by far the 
larger proportion of cases, will fortunately never be raised nor require 
to be so. I cannot, however, declare the determination of the 
diagnosis to be impossible. Since, on the one hand, the true 

♦ Op. cit, 8. 78, &c. 



§ 92.— a. ARTIFICIAL INFLATION. 67 

cinnabar-red of the inflated lungs already described is very visibly 
different from tbeir post-foetal colour, and on the other hand, even 
in the most successful attempt at inflation the circumscribed dark- 
mottled patches (§ 88) are always absent. Perfectly pure cases are 
therefore susceptible of a positive determination ; I mean on the one 
hand, a case in which the respiration has been full and decided, and 
on the other, one in which the child has been bom dead and the lungs 
subsequently successfully inflated. Further, the inflated foetal lungs 
may also be distinguished from those lungs which have respired 
by the greater amount of blood contained in the latter, that is, 
incisions into the substance of those lungs which have respired will 
distinctly give vent to a bloody froth {Fide § 96), which is wanting 
when foetal lungs, containing consequently but little blood, have been 
artificially inflated. Since successful inflation truly fills the lungs 
with air, but attracts to them not one single drop of blood more than 
what they previously contained, incisions therefore into artificially 
inflated lungs give rise to the same sound of crepitation as incisions 
into those lungs which have respired, because in both cases air 
escapes from the cells of the lung cut across, but no frothy blood 
escapes. — ^There is also one other diagnostic mark which sometimes, 
but not always, because it is dependant on the degree and amount 
of force applied, distinguishes between respiration and inflation. 
When the aur has been forcibly impelled in a rapid and powerful 
stream into the lungs, there is formed within them a condition, 
which, like that accompanying death from drowning, I am forced to 
term one of hyper cma ; many of the pulmonary cells are torn across, 
and large cavities are formed in the parenchyma, which are im- 
moderately filled with air. This condition is most unmistakably 
observed in the large external air-cells of the lungs, which thereby 
acquire an uneven surface and a lumpy appearance. This hyperseria, 
which is an artificial emphysema, is only observed, as has been stated, 
when the inflation has been forcibly and successfully carried out, spe- 
cially, therefore, when a blowpipe has been used on exenterated lungs. 
I must also add, that it is quite incorrect to suppose, as has been done, 
that the air can be e^sHij farced by compression out of lungs artificially 
inflated, but not out of those which have respired, or at least that it 
is more easy to do so in the former case than in the latter. Both of 
these ideas are perfectly erroneous, as I have been taught by innume- 
rable experiments, renewed every session in the course of my lectures. 
The air contained in the puhnonary cells, in whichever of these modes 

p2 



68 § 93.— iS. EMPHYSEMA PULMONUM NEONATORUM. 

it has been introduced, can never again be expelled, even by the em- 
ployment of the utmost violence, as by standing with the weight of the 
whole body u^wn a piece of lung, &c. ; and the portion of lung thus 
forcibly compressed, floats almost as well after its compression as 
before it. The air, whether it has been blown in or respired, can only 
be expelled by the complete destruction of the pulmonary cells, best 
performed by squeezing and lacerating a fragment of lung with the 
hand, and the piece of lung which previously floated sinks now to the 
bottom. When, therefore, we observe the following phenomena : a 
sound of crepitation without any escape of blood-froth on incision, 
laceration of the pulmonary cells with hjrperseria, bright cinnabar-red 
colour of the lungs without any marbling, and perhaps air in the 
(artificially inflated) stomach and intestines, we may with certainty 
conclude that the Inngs have been artificially inflated^ 

§ 93. Continuation* — /3. Emphysema Pulmontjm Neonatorum. 

I have already shown that the invention, for it is that rather than 
a discovery, called Ploucquet's lung-test is a complete delusion. And 
now another simUax fable comes before us, in the supposition of a 
spontaneous, morbid, congenital emphysema of the lungs in newborn 
children, which has also been employed as an objection against the 
docimasia pulmonaris, and particularly against the hydrostatic test, 
since "lungs may float> though they have never respired, when a 
morbid emphysema has been developed within them.'' Those ob- 
servers possessed of the largest experience have all doubted and 
contended against the truths of this extraordinary emphysema, yet it 
has not yet disappeared from the works of compiling medical jurists. 
Years ago we ventured to ask, who had ever seen this pathological 
emphysema in the newborn child P"*^ Certainly neither Chaussier, 
nor W. Schmitt, nor Henke, nor Meyn, nor MichaeHs ? Chaussier 
relates the cases of children bom feet first, by turning, whose bodies 
were examined when quite fresh, and before the first appearance of 
putrescence, in which of course artificial inflation had not been 
resorted to, and yet in their lungs he " sometimes'' found air in 
isolated patches, which rendered these fragments buoyant. He 
supposed that the lungs had been crushed during the turning, the 
effusion of blood had ensued, and that the putrefaction of this blood 

* Gerichtl. Leichenoffn. I., 3 Auf., s. 90. 



§ 93.-/3. EMPHYSEMA PULMONUM NEONATORUM. 69 

had occasioned the production of air (emphysema) within the lungs ! 
But what relation, we may ask, do these cases of Chanssier, the 
subjects of severe and artificial labour, bear to liie judicial docimasia 
pulmonaris, which always presupposes a labour of the directly 
opposite character? Further, as to Henke and his three ^^cases,^^* 
a literary ofience of the most mischievous character has been re- 
peatedly proved against them. The solitary actual observation which 
he quotes, is that related by W. Schmitt. But when we read it we 
find that it relates to a female child which had demonstrably breathed 
for twenty-four hours after its birth ! t At the commencement of 
his thirty-second experiment, we read word for word as foUows : " a 
mature, strong, and well-nourished girl, bom in a state of dormant 
vitality, was with much exertion roused to life, and twenty-four 
hours subsequent to its birth, without ever having given vent to a 
strong (sic !) cry, it quietly slipped away.^' The lungs, ^^ quite fresh 
and without any trace of putrescence,'' floated both with and without 
the heaxt, ^^ but not perfectly,'^ and ^^ on the middle lobe of the right 
lung two rows of contiguous air-bubbles were visible, situated in the 
parenchyma/' That, therefore, is Schmitt's case ! The child was 
bom on the second of May (in spring weather therefore). How 
long after death the section was performed, W. Schmitt does not 
state! But the appearances in the lungs, as described by him, 
precisely resemble those of jputrefactive bullse, and if there were no 
other "trace of putrefaction'' visible on this body, I may remark 
that it is certainly perfectly correct in the larger proportion of cases 
to exclude all idea of putrescence in the lungs, where the whole body, 
and all the other organs which putrefy earlier than the lungs, have 
not abeady succumbed to its influence {vide § 94), yet exceptional 
cases do occur, and under certain conditions not yet known, pu- 
trescence may occur in the lungs very prematurely ; such cases are 
indubitably extremely rare, but they do occur, as is incontrovertibly 
proved by the four (10 — 13) cases already related by me (Gen. Div. 
§ 22, p. 50, vol. I.). Secondly, Henke quotes not an observation, 
but an opinion, of Albertis', and, thirdly, he quotes a supposititious 
case from the Edinburgh commentaries, which never existed I ! The 
cases of Meyn and Michaelis are more important, and are those on 
which Mauch has chiefly based his work, " upon Emphysema in the 

* Abhandl. a. d. Geb. der ger. Med., Bd. 2. Leipzig, 1823, s. 154. 
t Neue Versuche imd Erfahrungen, &c. Wien, 1806, s. 41. 



70 § 93.— i3. EMPHYSEMA PULMONUM NEONATORUM. 

lungs of newborn childretf' (Hamburg, 1841). In Meyn^s case, 
the lungs certainly possessed all the relative qualities of foetal lungs, 
except that they floated, and " upon their external surface there were 
visible small, not elevated, whitish-coloured streaks, which, by press- 
ing and smoothing, were made to lose themselves upon the surface, 
and which appeared to arise within the cellular tissue connecting the 
jfileura pulmonum with the pulmonary substance, and thus appeared 
to have occasioned a circumscribed loosening of the pleura; these 
streaks very often appeared of various sizes, like small white puncti- 
form air-bubbles, at the edges of the various pulmonary lobes/' 
"Whoever reads this description, and has seen the commencing 
development of putrescence in the lungs, will have no difficulty in 
concluding that this case is nothing else than an example of this 
condition. This explanation ''of a commencing putrefaction'' has 
also most correctly been assigned to it by Gotze. The body was not 
dissected till ten days after the death of the child (on the 25th of 
March). During one portion of this time the body had been lying 
in a warm feather bed, during another, and that the larger portion, 
the body had lain in water, and for several days it had been exposed 
to the air in a closed apartment I The weather was ''the first very 
warm weather of spring, with strong sunshine !" Therefore all the 
conditions most favourable for the production of putrescence were 
present in this case, and one can only wonder that in the child only 
the cerebrum and cerebellum were so " soft and pultaceous, that they 
could no longer be anatomically examined," and that the putrefac- 
tion had not already advanced much farther, which the physician on 
his part ascribed to the coldness and chemical qualities of the marsh 
water. Finally, the case of MichaeHs.* This was that of a girl 
bom secretly and prematurely, which, according to the statement of 
the unmarried mother (what a source I !), was said to have been bom 
dead, and with the assistance of the mother's hand (!). "The left 
lung scarcely reached to the side of the heart, the right however 
attained to its anterior surface ; they were both generally of a bright 
red colour, and everywhere, but particularly posteriorly, mottled 
with blue." (I omit the weight, as proving nothing.) "They 
floated with the heart and thymus gland upon the water, and gave 
forth a distinct sound of crepitation upon incision, and fine froth " 
(bloody?) "appeared upon the cut surface. Every portion of them 



* Mauoh, op, cU,, s. 82, &o. 



§ 96.— )3. EMPHYSEMA PULMONUM NEONATORUM. 71 

floated in the water. All the organs within the chest/' consequently 
also the lungs, ^^ contained a considerable amount of blood.'' TAis 
case, then, is quoted as a proof of ^^ the spontaneous development 
of a morbid emphysema within the lungs?" No practitioner can 
have any doubt that tAis child had breathed, even though the 
mother, after her secret delivery, has asserted the contrary ! ! If, 
under circumstances like those of the case now before us, we are to 
assume without criticism the development of an emphysema of the 
lungs of a child bom dead, we may make a similar supposition in at 
least the half of all the cases of newborn children which are brought 
to the medico-legal dissecting-table ! It appears almost superfluous 
also to examine the other case which Mauch"*^ quotes from an 
anonymous writer, and which he gives as an actual instance of this 
emphysema. After a labour of four days, which ended with the 
death of the mother, the child was dismembered, the brain was 
removed, and ^^ pieces of bone taken from the head." On the body, 
'^ the head was found to be twisted by the means employed to assist 
delivery, the umbilical cord was firmly wound round the neck, one 
forearm torn off, the bones of the skuU broken down to their base, a 
portion of them torn away, and the whole skull fall of sharp points, 
and edges of bone." We do not require to hear any more in order 
to arrive at the conviction that this case of a child, so fearfully dis- 
membered by artificial assistance (!), has not the shghtest connection 
with the subject of secret birth, and the hydrostatic test ! But how 
absurd is the whole observation! ^'The lungs were of a bluish 
colour" (were marbled therefore?), '^and on their edges distinctly 
displayed air " (but how ?), '^ and had the appearance of lungs which 
had breathed; this portion also floated when separated from the 
rest, and gave forth, when compressed beneath the surface of the 
water, many small air-bubbles and some blood; it also sank after a 
time in the water, even when it had not been compressed." This 
statement of itself makes the whole case perfectly untrustworthy. 
Any lung, or the smallest portion of any lung, which has once 
floated perfectly, never of itself sinks ^^ after sometime," whatever 
may have been the source of the air within it. The anonymous 
author goes on to report that the rest of the lungs sank in the water, 
^^ but the heart floated, because the pericardium was quite emphy- 
sematous, and the heart, even to its small superficial vessels, filled 

* Op. cit., s. 34. 



72 POSTSCRIPT TO § 93. 

with air/' All this once more points to putrefaction, which has 
affected the heart earlier and to a greater extent than the lungs, but 
nothing is told us as to the general amount of putrefaction present 
in the body, nothing as to the period after death when the dissection 
took place, nor the temperature at the time, whether it was 
+ 20° E. = 77° F., or - 15^ K = - l.°75 F. Nothing as to 
whether a rib was not broken by the fearful violence to which the 
child had been subjected, which might have injured the lungs, &c. ; 
in short, this ''observation,^' contributed forty-five years ago, by an 
unknown and nameless author, must be set aside as completely 
worthless. According to all that we have just stated, we must lay 
down as a principle : tAat as yet not one single well-observed and 
incontestable case of emphysema, developing itself spontaneously 
within the foetal lungs, is known, and it is therefore not permissible 
in forensic practice to ascribe the buoyancy of the lungs of newborn 
children to this cause.* 

Postscript to §93. — ^Emphysema Pulmonum Neonatorum. 

After the forgoing was printed, there was published by Hecker 
in the Archiv fur pathoL Anat. u. Physiol., 1859, xvi., s. 535, 
&c., the following relative remarkable case, which is far too important 
to be passed over in silence. The f-esh body of a child was dis- 
sected (in March) only six hours affcer it had been bom dead. The 
sounds of the heart had not been heard for one hour previous to 
birth. Affcer the thorax was laid open, however, the lungs were seen 
to be '' greatly distended,^' in particular the left lung covered the 

* In my endeavour to place in this book Forensic Medicine upon the firm 
basis of the scientific observation of nature, and to oppose as much as pos- 
sible the much-affected habit of accumulating a mass of mere quotations, I 
have in the first (German) edition, s. 749, quoted at this place the ** Lehr- 
buch der Gerichtlichen Medicin von Dr. J.H. Schurmayer, Erlangen, 1850," 
in which the author, s. 305, gives no fewer than twenty-five quotations 
respecting this emphysema of the lungs of newborn children, from which 
inexperienced persons might suppose that this emphysema (the existence of 
which I have denied above) has yet been actually observed by the authors 
quoted. I have therefore {loc, cit) shown how incorrect and erroneous all 
these quotations are, which have been exclusively taken from Mauch's work, 
without any personal examination. Since, however, the author has himself 
omitted these quotations from the second edition of his work, the remarks 
made on them in the earlier edition of this book are now suppressed. 



POSTSCRIPT TO § 93. 73 

pericardium ^' after a fashion usoallj observed oaly subsequent to 
the complete establishment of respiration ; they also had not the red- 
brown colour of the foetal lungs, but were much brighter, greyish- 
red, and felt spongy/' Both lungs floated perfectly even to their 
smallest pieces- Not a trace of putrescence was observable. " Both 
lungs were not only filled with very much blood, so that incisions 
into their parenchyma gave vent to frothy blood, but on many parts 
of their surface, particularly on their edges, an unmistakable emphy" 
sema existed, precisely the same as has been observed where artificial 
inflation has been carelessly practised in a case of apparent death, 
and the chfld thus actually brought to respire has shortly thereafter 
died ; large bubbles containing air alternated with snow-white patches 
of the well known appearance. The trachea was examined down to its 
finest divisions, it was empty, and its mucous membrane was some- 
what reddened, the heart contained much dark, coagulated blood/' 
The case as we have just related it is unquestionably a most impor- 
tant one, and as yet perfectly unique. It is quite indubitable that 
the child must have breathed, and that it must have made in utero 
such powerful inspirations as to have ruptured the air-cells, as in 
forcible inflation, and produced a traumatic emphysema. This intra- 
uterine respiration is siso easily understood when we learn " that the 
child from the escape of the liquor amnii to the time of its death 
had seventeen horns during which it might respire ; during this time 
also the mother was very frequently examined, and often with half of 
the hand in order to determine a contraction of the pelvis, the air 
was thereby freely and frequently permitted to reach the wpmb.'' 
The usual conditions of the so-caUed vagitus uterinus were therefore 
present, and the case was another of those tedious labours requiring 
the assistance of art to terminate them, and not one more or less 
rapid, not a secret and lonely birth as all those are, the results of 
which are brought to the dissecting-table of the medical jurist {J'ide 
p. 37, Vol. III., fee). However strong the proof, therefore, 
afforded by this case in favour of a premature intra-uterine respira- 
tion, which, under certain circumstances, is no longer contested, it is 
of no value as a proof of a ''morbid emphysema,'^ which is supposed 
to develope itself within the foetal lungs, and which has been em- 
ployed as an objection to the hydrostatic test. The knowledge of 
this remarkable case only requires the opinion just given to be thus 
modified: that not one single well-observed and incontestable case 
of emphysema developing itself spontaneously within the lungs of a 



74 § 94.— y. PUTRESCENCE OF THE LUNGS. 

fcebu9y horn without artificial assistance, is knouon, and it is not, 
therefore, permissible in forensic practice, to ascribe the buoyancy of 
the lungs of newborn children, brought forth in secrecy and without 
artificial assistance, to this cause, 

§ 94. Continuation. — 7. Putebscencb of the Lungs. 

The last objection raised against the hydrostatic test is, that even 
fcetal lungs may become more or less buoyant, or even capable of 
floating perfectly, by the development within them of the gaseous 
products of putrescence. From this point of view also, its opponents, 
therefore, say that the hydrostatic lung-test is uncertain, and of no 
probative value. It certainly wiU never occur to any practical man 
to deny this fact in itself, since it can be immediately proved by expe- 
riment on any suitable lung. But a careful medical jurist will not 
permit himself to be deceived by this, since the differential diagnosis 
between the air that has entered the lungs by the respiratory process 
and that produced by the putrefactive process is really not difficult 
to make. In the first place, namely, according to my own observa- 
tions, it is incontestably true that the lungs belong to those organs 
which are latest of putrefying (p. 49, Vol. I.). So it is in by far the 
larger proportion of cases, and those in which there is a very early 
occurrence of putrescence in the lungs, even previous to the general 
putrefraction of the body, constitute the rarest exceptions (p. 50, 
Vol. I.). From this cause alone it may be decided with certainty, 
that where lungs float when taken out of a body which is still fresh, 
or which at the most displays only the earliest traces of commencing 
putrefaction, this floating certainly does not arise from the presence 
of the gaseous products of putrefaction, and the other appearances 
on dissection which assist in forming the docimasia pulmonaris will 
complete the proof. To this must be added, that the diagnosis 
may be formed with care even from the external appearance of the 
lungs, 

I have already (§ 22, Gen, Div., p. 49, Vol. I.) fully described 
the appearance of lungs which are commencing to putrefy, and I 
beg to refer to this description. I have not observed any difference 
whether the lungs were those of a child bom dead, or of one that had 
respired. We always find gaseous bullse beneath the pleura, the size 
of miUet-seeds, pearls, or beans, which are either all much of the 
same size, or present considerable variety in this respect ; they axe 



§ 94.--y. PUTRESCENCE OF THE LUNGS. 75 

either isolated or in groups^ like a string of pearls^ and are very 
visible on the surface of the lungs, most commonly at their base, or 
in the interstices of the lobes, and continue visible even after the 
internal cells of the parenchyma are filled with the gaseous products 
of decomposition, a condition which cannot be recognised with the 
eye. From this condition of the exterior, however, the presence of 
the gaseous products of decomposition is at once recognised, and it 
serves as a guide to the value of the hydrostatic test in the case m 
question, even when the colour of the lungs is not altered in the 
least, and continues to be foetal or post-foetal as the case may be. 
Powerful and successful artificial inflation may certainly give rise to 
bullse perfectly similar to those described as the result of putrescence ; 
but in medico-legal cases there cannot in general be any question of 
artificial inflation (§ 92). When putrefaction has advanced further, 
when the serous covering of the lungs has lost its lustre, when they 
have become dark-grey, greyish-black, pultaceous and stinking, it is 
completely imposssible any longer to mistake the cause of their 
buoyancy. I am very far from supposing that the jloating of the 
lungs of itself can prove anything when both they and the whole 
body have already passed into such an advanced stage of putrescence, 
especially since I know no way of distinguishing between foetal 
lungs, and those that have respired, when both have become buoyant 
from decomposition. But even in these bodies the hydrostatic test 
may yet be of practical value, namely, when it affords a negative 
evidence, when, for instance, the lungs of the greyish-green body of 
a child sink in the water, as I have frequently seen them do {Vide 
Cases CCCXXXVII.— CCCXLII.). This negative proof has been 
often of the greatest use to me, in enabling me, in spite of the most 
advanced state of general putrefaction, still to decide with greater or 
less probability that the child had not lived. I shall by and by re- 
late two cases (CCCXL. and CCCXLI.) of highly-decomposed new- 
born children, in which the putrefied heart and liver floated, while 
the well-preserved lungs sank. 

Maschka^s very numerous experiments* have decided a question 
apt to arise in regard to the floating of lungs from the development 
of the gaseous products of decomposition within them, whether 
namely, lungs which have once floated from this cause, subsequently 
become incapable of floating and sink ? and from my own experi- 

♦ Prager Vierteljahrsohrift, 1857, 1. 69, &c. 



76 § 95.- POST-RESPIRATORY SINKING OF THE LUNGS. 

ments on the putrefied lungs both of children born alive and of 
those bom dead^ I can confirm his statements. When all the 
gaseoHs bullae beneath the pleura have been successfully punctured, 
then the lungs, which had previously floated from the buoyancy of 
the aerial contents of these bullee, sink in the water. But it is not 
always possible to destroy these buUse, especially when they are in 
great numbers and of small size. If however this puncturing has 
been successfully performed, and if the lung, previously buoyant, 
now sinks, then we have thereby gained an important evidence in 
favour of the child not having respired, which may be raised to 
perfect certainty by the results of the rest of the examination. These 
experiments have, therefore, a practical significance for the medical 
jurist. On the other hand, a scientific, but no practical value, belongs 
to the observations of Maschka and myself, that lungs buoyant from 
putrescence, when observed for some time, several weeks, under the 
utmost variety of temperature of the air and water, at last sink. 
They are then found to have crumbled to detritus, and lie at the 
bottom of the yessel as a pultaceous mass of dirty-black shreds. In 
the course of a more protracted period, the lungs within the body of 
a child suffer the same destruction from the progress of putrefac- 
tion, with the exception of falling into separate shreds, which I at 
least have never yet observed; it is, however, evident that long ere 
that time they have ceased to afford any evidence in regard to the 
fact of respiration. 

§ 95. Continuation. — ^Post-respieatory sinking of the Lungs. 

We have still to examine the directly opposite objection to the 
hydrostatic test, that lungs which have respired may nevertheless 
sink, and that consequently from this point of view also the hydro- 
static test is a ^' dubious and uncertain ^^ experiment. The conditions 
which we have now to consider are : the so-called atelectasis, suffo- 
catory hypersemia, and hepatisatipn (splenisation) of the lungs. 
These conditions have been already considered at length in § 89 
(p. 53, Vol. III.). That each of them may occasion the lungs to 
sink, is just as indubitable as that this may be also caused in other 
cases by pathological pseudo-formations, particularly tubercle. 

Some years ago I opened the body of a child, which was well 
known to have lived for eight days, and had died in the Charite 
Hospital. The lungs were entirely of the brownish-red colour and 



§ 95.-POST-RESPIRATORY SINKING OF THE LUNGS. 77 

compact consistence of foetal lungs, and sank completely even to 
their smallest particles. Incisions revealed the red hepatisation 
which was suspected, and the existence of the pneumonia, which was 
diagnosed, was subsequently confirmed by an inspection of the Hos- 
pital sick reports. A precisely similar example was presented by a 
two days^ old child, which was bom with pemphigus and died from 
unilateral pneumonia. The left lung, of a mingled bluish and rosy- 
red colour, floated just as completely as the right one, in a state of 
red hepatisation, sank. One example of the sinking of one lung from 
suffocatory hyperemia, while the other floated, has been already de- 
tailed (Case CCXLIII.), and similar cases will be found related 
among the illustrative cases which follow ( Vide CGCLin.-CXX)LXI.). 
The following case was as instructive as it is rare. A female 
eight-months' child, bom in Hospital of a syphilitic mother, was 
brought before us for dissection. The child was very insufficiently 
nourished, it weighed only four pounds^ and had upon its feet an 
eruption similar to pemphigus. The lungs were quite variegated in 
appearance, namely blue and red, with brighter mottlings, and 
thickly strewn with yellow glimmering tubercular deposits, some of 
which at the apex of the left lung were of the size of a hazel-nut. 
Corresponding with these appearances^ the lungs were partiy crepi- 
tant, and partly (over the tubercular deposits) cartilaginous to the 
feel. United to the heart they sank rapidly in the water. Never- 
theless we were convinced from the strongly marked mottling of the 
lungs, that the child must have lived (Fide p* 58, Vol. III.). 
Separated from the heart, the left lung sank completely, whilst the 
right floated just beneath the surface of the water, and of its lobes the 
middle and lower one floated perfectly. When finally divided into 
many small pieces, ten pieces of the right lung and four of the left 
one were found to float perfectly. The supposition that the child 
had lived after its birth was completely confirmed by subsequent 
inquiries at the Hospital. It had lived for about a quarter of 
an hour. 

But what do all these cases prove ? Certainly not the uncertainty 
of the docimasia pulmonaris as a whole ? Does not even the most 
zealous champion of the modern contemners of this test, Henke, say 
that conditions such as we have here related are extremely rare {that 
they are not, as may be easily seen from my own observations alone), 
and that they cannot be mistaken. And indeed, where such condi- 
tions of the lungs as those we have just referred to have been 



78 $ 96.—*. INCISIONS INTO THE LUNG. 

mistaken by a medical jurist who has suffered himself to conclude, 
iolely because both the lungs sank, that there had been no respira- 
tion, there we would indeed have to lament the insufficiency of the 
'^ expert,^' but not that of science I There is, therefore, no foundation 
for the fancied uncertainty of the hydrostatic test in itself in general^ 
which has been deduced from the pulmonary conditions just re- 
ferred to. 

§96. Continuation. — i. Incisions into the Pulmonaey 
Substance. 

It is an error of frequent occurrence, to speak of the foetal lungs 
as containing no blood, since their nutrient vessels must necessarily 
supply them with blood. But it is equally certain that, with the 
commencement of respiration, that is, with the opening of the sluices 
of the lesser circulation, a new and greater amount of blood suddenly 
begins to stream into the lungs, which bears not the slightest relation 
to the amount of blood previously existent in them. Alas! we 
possess as yet no means of more accurately determining this fact in 
a scientific manner, since we have already shown, when investigating 
Ploucquet's test, that it does not bear a ratio of 2 : 1, that is, that the 
lungs do not become as heavy again as they were in their foetal 
condition. The fact itself is not the less constant. This greater 
amount of blood contained must make itself perceptibly evident, 
when incisions are made into the pulmonary parenchyma and the 
blood-vessels are divided, and the outflowing blood, particularly when 
gentle pressure is employed, must necessarily mingle with the in- 
spired air escaping from the cut pulmonary cells, which causes the 
well-known 9(mnd of crepitalion, and well-forth, as a bloo(^ frothy 
generally of a dark colour. It is easy to point out the diagnostic 
value of this appearance in relation to the question of respiration. 
Even on incising foetal lungs blood does and must escape, often mingled 
with mucus or liquor amnii. But it requires a comparatively strong 
pressure, amounting occasionally to an actual compression of the cut 
portions, to make the blood well forth, while, on incising lungs which 
have respired very frequently when the organs are tolerably full of 
blood, or actually hypersenric, the bloody froth runs forth of itself, or 
appears upon the sUghtest pressure. Further, the frothy condition of 
the blood, as well as the sound of crepitation, are wholly awaiiting in 
the case of foetal lungs, just because the cause of both of these phe- 



§ 97.~THE OSSEOUS NUCLEUS. 79 

nomena, the inspired air, is wanting in them. Finally, for the same 
reasons, on making pressure upon the incised portions of the post- 
foetal lungs beneath the surface of the water, the expressed air is seen 
to ascend in the form of small air^btibbles, but nothing of this kind 
is or can be seen in the case of foetal lungs. The differences 
between the two kinds of lungs in this respect are so important and 
so evident, that errors in respect to these experiments and their 
signification are, with a little attention, impossible. It is true — once 
more to return to the objections against the practical utility of this 
test — ^that artificially inflated lungs, as well as those containing the 
gaseous products of putrefaction, likewise give forth a sound of 
crepitation when their cut portions are compressed, from which also 
air-bubbles ascend when this pressure is applied under water ; but 
of course neither of these conditions can in the slightest degree in- 
crease the amount of blood contained in the lungs, and, therefore, 
actual bloody froth will never be seen under either of these circum- 
stances. Further, it must be mentioned that this appearance, in spite 
of the actual occurrence of respiration, may fail or cease to be 
observable, when the lungs have commenced to putrefy and have, 
along with all the rest of the body, become anaemic from that cause; 
or when the blood has escaped from lungs that have breathed by a 
haemorrhage that has been fatal to the child. In both of these 
cases, however, the other diagnostic phenomena are so apparent that 
a proper consideration of them will prevent even those less experi- 
enced from being deceived. For these reasons tie flow of lloody 
froth from the cut surfaces of the lungs, upon the application of 
slight pressure, must be declared to be an appearance of the highest 
value, 

§ 97. The Centre of Ossification in the Inferior Femoral 

Epiphysis. 

The new Prussian Regulations (p. 86, Vol. I.), quite correctly, 
do not require the medical jurist, in addition to the phenomena we 
have hitherto considered in regard to the docimasia puhnonaris, also 
to examine the state of the foetal blood-vessels and circulatory 
openings, or to inspect the contents of the urinary bladder or rectum 
— ^both of which organs must, however, be investigated for other 
reasons, at this as well as at every other period of life — as appearances 
to be considered in delivering his opinion in regard to the question 



80 § 98.-URIC ACID IN THE KIDNEY. 

of respiratory life. Nevertheless this is constantly done by all the 
physicians of the realm, from the force of ancient custom, as so 
many other things in medico-legal practice are handed down and 
conserved by tradition alone. The Regulations also rightly enough 
omit any mention of an object of examination which is the result of 
recent discovery, and which we shall presently detail, but they do 
prescribe the necessity of ascertaining the existence of the osseous 
nucleus in the inferior femoral epiphysis. This appearance has 
been already treated of in detail in § 80 (p. 23, Vol. IIIO> where 
its value as a proof of maturity has been estimated. As the result 
of the continuous and vigorous advancement of the process of ossi- 
fication, this osseous nucleus also, however, possesses a relative value 
in deciding the doubtful question of the child's life after birth. And 
I beg to repeat the rule above laid down ; that an osseous nucleus of 
more than three lines {Rhenish) in diameter permits the deduction 
that the child has lived after its birth. But few exceptions to this 
rule are likely to occur. Any such child bom dead with an osseous 
nucleus of more than three lines in diameter, would, however, be at 
once recognised as a child bom dead, by means of the docimasia 
pulmonaris, to which of course the greater probative power must 
always be granted. I have, however, already pointed out (§ 80, 
p. 28, Vol. III.), that the reverse of this rule does not hold good, 
that is, that an osseous nucleus less than three lines in diameter 
does not prove that the child has not lived. 

§ 98. Ueic Acid Deposit in the Ducts of Bellini. 

Cless was the first in Germany to point out the occurrence of uric 
acid salts in the kidneys of newborn and young children, which are 
found as a deposit in the renal canals, which has received the some- 
what improper name of the uric acid infarctus.* When kidneys 
which contain this deposit are laid open, as they usually are at dissec- 
tion, vertically from the convexity to the pelvis, and two halves thus 
separated, this deposit is at once distinctly perceived by the unaided 
eye in the form of bright yellowish-red points or stripes, which repre- 
sent the ducts of the pyramids {Vide the representation, Plate VII., 
Figs. 21 and 22). Any confounding of these with fat globules is at 
once rendered impossible by the use of a simple magnifying-glass, 

♦ Med. Correspond. Blatt des Wurtemb. arztl. Vereins, 1841, II. s. 114. 



§ 98. URIC ACID IN THE KIDNEYS. 81 

or a microscope, although at the first glance of a somewhat short- 
sighted eye these deposits certainly somewhat resemble fatty particles. 
Many more recent observations made by Engel, Schlossberger, 
Martin, Virchow, Hoogeweg, Hodann, and myself have placed 
the existence of this appearance beyond a doubt. Since Schloss- 
berger, however, made the statement, *Uhat this injection of the 
renal ducts with urates is never found in the bodies of children 
which have not breathed, that the discovery of this deposit, therefore, 
permits the conclusion being drawn with sufBcient certainty that 
the child has lived (though the reverse does not hold good *)" the 
question has acquired a medico-legal importance, and this all the 
more that men are generally only too prone to distrust the results of 
the oidinsiTj docimasia pulmonaris. Virchow f and Elsftsser J adopt 
Schlossberger's views, while Martin § and Weber || do not regard these 
views as correct, and Hoogeweg IT and Hodann*'**' only accord to 
this appearance the value of proof adjuvant to the general do- 
cimasia pulmonaris. In a medico-legal point of view it appears 
somewhat critical, that hitherto the researches made upon the bodies 
of children bom dead or who have died soon after their birth (for such 
cases alone can possess any medico-legal interest), have not suf&ced to 
settle the question whether the deposit of urates is a normal and 
physiological, or an anormal and pathological appearance P Engel,tt 
Virchow, Martin, and Hodann, &c., regard it as physiological and 
produced by the great alterations produced in the vegetative life 
of the child after its extrusion from the uterus; Meckel J J and 
V. Faber§§ regard it as pathological, while Schlossberger || || leaves 
the matter undecided. It is at once evident from these doubts how 

♦ Arohiv fiir Physiol. Heilkunde. 1850. ix. s. 647. 

t Verhandlungen der Gesellsohaft fiir Geburtshulfe in Berlin, 1847, ii., 
8. 170. t Op. city 8. 77. 

§ Jenaisohe Annalen fiir Phys. u. Med. 1850, s. 126. 

II Beitr. z. pathoL Anat. der Neugebornen, 1854. 

t Casper's Yierteljahrschrift, vii. 1 s., 33, &o, 

♦♦ Jahresbericht der Schlesichen Gesellsohaft fur vaterl. Kultur fur das 
Jahr., 1854. Breslau (1856) 4. s. 139, &o. (This also appeared as a separate 
pamphlet at Breslau in 1856.) It is a monograph which perfectly exhausts 
the subject, and contains a plate. 

ft CEsterr. medio. "Wochenschr. 1842. 

XI Annalen des Charit^-Krankenhauses, iv. 2. Berlin, 1853. 

§§ Anleitung zur gerichtl. Unters. neugeb. Kinder. Stuttg. 1855, s. 145. 

nil Op, cic.yB, 545. 

VOT*. III. G 



82 § 98, URIC ACID IN THE KIDNEYS. 

often this appearance must be absent from the bodies of newborn 
children ; and this fact has been amply confirmed by my own very 
numerous dissections for judicial purposes of the bodies of children 
actually newly-born {Vide also the list of cases given by Schloss- 
berger, &c.) It may therefore be concluded with certainty, that 
the absence of this deposit of urates is in itself of no value as proof 
of the condition {living or dead) of the child at its birth. But even 
iksR presence of this deposit can now no longer be used as proof that 
the child was not dead at its birth, therefore, of its live-birth, 
since to the earlier cases published by Hoogeweg, Martin, and 
Virchow, &c., of children which had died previous to or in the birth, 
and in whom this deposit was found, more and more well-observed 
cases of a similar character are continually being added. In a few 
rare cases, where the children had died during the birth, Weber* 
found sand in the ducts of the pyramids. . Lehmannf also saw with 
the unaided eye a great quantity of sand in the bladder of a child 
bom dead, and he found on the microscopic examination of the 
kidneys, ^^ almost as often in those born dead as in those born alive,^' 
small, irregular, dark-coloured, sparkling granules strewn in and 
between the urinary ducts, or crystallized in larger granular masses. 
Schwartz J has published two very accurately described cases, in 
which both children (delivered with the forceps) were bom with 
feeble pulsation of the heart, but could not be brought to respire. 
In the first child there was " uric acid sand in the pelves of the 
kidneys and in the ducts of the papillae; ^^ in the second child 'Hhe 
straight urinary ducts of both the healthy kidneys were filled with a 
reddish deposit of uric acid/^ B. Schulze^s case § is as follows : — 
In a child born in the Berlin University Maternity Hospital, after a 
labour lasting three days, in which no trace of cardiac contraction or 
of respiratory movement could be perceived, the right kidney dis- 
played in several of its pyramids a distinct deposit of uric acid. 
A precisely similar case of a dead-born child happened in the 
same institution in the year 1858, in which the deposit was 
indeed unusually visible. I have to thank the kindness of the 
physicians to the Maternity for enabling me personally to observe 
the two preparations last mentioned. In this state of matters the 

• F. Weber, Beitrage zur pathol. Anat. Neugebomer. Kiel, 1854. 
t Neederiandsche "Weekblatt. 1853, Marz. 
X Die vorzeitigen Athembewegungen. Leipzig, 1857, s. 57, &c. 
§ Deutsche Klinik, 1858, No. 41. 



§ 99. SEPARATION OF THE CORD. 83 

appearance of auric acid deposit in the kidneys of new-born children 
can no longer he acknowledged to he of any diagnostic value in 
relation to the question of resjpiratory life. The whole subject is, 
therefore of no value in forensic medicine, however important it may 
be to physiologists and pathologists — to whose further inquiry and 
discovery the subject must now be left. 

§ 99. The Remains of the Umbilical Cord. — ^Thb Ring op De- 
marcation. — Mummification. — ^The separation of the Cord. 

In § 77 (p. 9, Vol. III.) we have already spoken of the umbilical 
eord in regard to its employment in the diagnosis of the age of a 
child. As to its signification as a proof of IMe after birth, attention 
must in the first place be directed to the fact, that in perfectly fresh 
bodies a bright red ring, about one line in breadth, is seen surround- 
ing the root (insertion) of the umbilical cord, which must not be 
looked upon as the commencement of the throwing off of the cord, 
and consequently as a proof of living reaction. For this areola is 
formed within the uterus, and is, therefore, observed even in 
children which have been born dead. It is impossible, however, to 
observe this appearance in such bodies as have the abdomen, as so 
often happens in medico-legal cases, already green from putrescence, 
or even blaclrish-green, and with the cuticle peeled off. In these, 
alas ! too frequent cases, another much more important appearance 
also ceases to be visible, an appearance which must not be con- 
founded with that just mentioned, and which affords irrefragable 
proof of the extra-uterine life of the child y the appearance, namely, of 
the commencement of the separation of the umbilical cord. This also 
is a bright red ring about two lines broad surrounding the insertion 
of the cord, but with thickening, inflammatory swelling of the por- 
tion of skin affected, and slight purulent secretion from the umbilical 
ring itself. This appearance may be visible on the third day of 
extra-uterine life. The suppuration may however continue, as every 
physician knows from experience, in increased quantity for eight to 
fourteen days, or even longer, after the complete separation of the 
umbiUcal cord.* Somewhat earlier, towards the end of the second 

♦ H. V. Meckel has described with great mimiteness the physio-patholo- 
gical nature of the process, in his paper on " die Eitenmg beim AMallen des 
Nabelstrangs," in the Annalen des Charity -Erankenhanses zu Berlin, 
1853, iv. 2. 8. 218, &c. 

62 



84 § 99. SEPARATION OF THE CORD. 

day of extra-uterine life, the umhilical cord commences to mummify 
from the point of division towards its insertion, which it reaches on 
the fourth or fifth day. Some (Billard, Hervieux, &c.) have inter- 
preted the drying up of the fluids of the cord as an act of vitality, 
and consequently, as a proof of the respiratory life of the child. 
Nothing is, however, more erroneous, as has already been proved by 
the researches of Giinz, Elsasser, and H. v. Meckel, as well as by 
my own very numerous expOTments. They experimented, as I also 
continually do, in comparing pieces of umbilical cord mummified and 
separated by the natural process, procured from the Maternity 
Hospital, with artficially mummified pieces of umbilical cord cut 
fresh and juicy from the bodies of children bom dead. The latter 
were always divided into two portions, and one part exposed to the 
sun in the open air, while the other was dried in a perfectly dry and 
shady vaulted cdlar. To produce complete dryness one-half longer 
time was required in the shade than in the sun, from three to six 
days in the sun, and from six to twelve days in the shade. In 
three pieces of umbilical cord, one naturally mummified and separated 
from the living child, the other two, artificially dried after death, one 
in the sun and the other in the shade, not the slightest difference can 
be perceived even with a magnifying-glass. In all the three we 
have the same ribbon-like surface, the same tendency to twist round 
the long axis, the same well-known greyish-black colour with fine 
red vessels faintly glimmering through, the same parchment-like 
consistence, and finally, the same manner of softening in water either 
cold or hot. After the lapse of about an hour the leathery cords 
commence to soften, they swell up somewhat, are slightly flexible 
when bent or manipulated, and are as it were shot with greyish- 
white. But no amount of steeping in water can ever restore the 
pristine character of the cord in all its freshness, and it remains 
leathery and of a washed-out-like grey appearance. These experi- 
ments are specially valuable in regard to chance cases of children 
thrown into the water after deaths and with their navel strings 
already mummified. Because an umbilical cord still fresh, or one no 
longer fresh, but in a state of moist putrefraction, when it gets into the 
water does not mummify but colliquesces, so that solely from the ap- 
pearance of mummification of the umbilical cord in the body of a 
child taken out of the water, we are entitled to conclude, that the 
child must have been already dead, and that for several days at 
least before it was thrown into the water. In bke manner, the 



§ 100. OBLITERATION OF THE FOETAL DUCTS. 85 

navel-string of a dead foetus does not mummify in the liquor 
amnii, so that a putrid foetus is never found to be bom with a 
mummified umbilical cord. Therefore, this appearance permits 
another very important practical conclusion to be drawn. When 
namely, the examination of the body has shown that a child, with 
the remains of a mummified navel-string attached, has been bom 
dead, and when, as so often happens, the probable date of the birth 
of this child is inquired by the Judge, then we may declare with 
certainty, from this appearance alone, and without any estima- 
tion of the progress made by putrefraction, that this deadbora child 
must have lain exposed to the air for several days before it was dis- 
covered. But to return to the main question, from the experiments 
just detailed, it must be considered as incontestably proved, that 
the mummification of the umbilical cord is not of the slightest value 
as a proof of extra-uterine life. Of course it is otherwise with the 
complete separation of the cord. This occurs from the fourth on to 
the sixth or seventh day. Only the grossest ignorance or carelessness 
would ever suppose that the cord had been separated by the natural 
process, when it had only been violently tom out of the umbilical 
ring; for, in the latter case, the edges are ragged and bloody, and can 
readily be distinguished even in putrefied bodies from an umbilicus 
actually cicatrizing. I scarcely need to add, however, that an umbili- 
cus already cicatrized is of course an infaUible proof that the child 
must have lived for at least from four to five days. 

§ 100. Obliteration of the Ducts, etc., pbculiae to the Fcetal 

ClECULATION. 

As has been already remarked, the Prassian '^ Regulations ^^ very 
properly do not require the medical jurist, at the autopsy of a newbom 
child, to pay any attention to the pervious or impervious condition 
of the foramen ovalCy the ductus arteriostis Botalliy the umbilical ar- 
teries and vein, and the ductus venosus, as criteria of the existence of 
respiratory life, since it is self-evident these foetal circulatory ducts 
must always be found pervious in newborn children, even when the 
widest possible signification is attached to this term, and it is made 
to include all the period from birth to the complete separation of 
the umbilical cord, so that their closure does not take place till so 
long after birth, that its discovery is no longer of any value. The 
foramen ovale is not fully closed before the second or third month. 



86 § 101. BLADDER AND RECTUM TEST. 

Accurate anatomical investigations, particularly those of Elsasser,"*^ 
into its gradual closure possess indeed an important physiological 
interest, but are only negatively of practical interest to the medical 
jurist, since no remarkable commencement of this closure is visible 
till after the lapse of the first few days of life, while it is precisely the 
first few hours, at the most the first day of life, that is in question 
in regard to newborn children. The same thing is true in regard to 
the diictus arteriosus, which is perfectly pervious for the first three or 
four days, and then commences gradually to contract, but a fine 
probe can be often enough passed through it at the end of eight 
weeks. The fine alterations in form which Bemt has described in 
relating his observations on the metamorphosis of this duct to a 
ligament, and which he wishes to be used as criteria, are conse- 
quently of no value at the medico-legal dissecting table. The 
umbilical arteries are the first of all the foetal ducts to close, these 
commence to contract in from eight to ten hours after birth, but in 
general their complete obliteration does not ensue till after the lapse 
of from five to six days, while that of the umbilical vein is still later, 
and the ductus venostis is very often found quite open in children of 
from one to two months old. In accordance with this fact, long 
well-known and confirmed by general experience, it is most advisable 
to omit all consideration of the condition of these foetal ducts at the 
medico-legal dissecting table, since official experience teaches that 
the consideration of cadaveric appearances, which do not actually 
belong to the subject in hand, especially of such subtilties as the 
steps in the process of closure of Botalli's duct as described by Bemt, 
is apt to make the judicial physician falter in his decision, and then 
" the wood is not seen for the trees.^^ 

§ 101. Bladder and Rectum Test. 

The unfounded objections which have been raised against the 
trustworthiness of the docimasia pulmonaris, and the equally un- 
founded supposition that urinary and fsecal evacuation are exclusively 
respiratory acts— the falsity of which is proved by the well-known 
fact, that meconium is found in the liquor amnii — ^have given rise to 
the introduction of the bladder and rectum test into medico-legal 
practice. A full bladder or a rectum stuffed with meconium is held 
to prove that the child has never breathed, while an empty bladder 
* Op, cit, s. 65, and Henke's Zeitsohr. Bd. 64, n, 247, &o. 



§ 102. ECCHYMOSES. 87 

and rectum is held to prove that it has breathed ! But what is held 
to be proved by the coincident discovery of a full bladder and an 
empt^ rectum, as I have found them unnumbered times, or by the 
reverse, I know not. It is not difficult to understand how of all 
places in the world, forensic medicine should in course of time be- 
come the receptacle of much trash, since the opportunity of acquiring 
any considerable amount of medico-legal experience is so rare : but 
it is almost impossible to understand how theories such as those 
involved in the bladder and rectum test have been able to gain 
admission (and to find a partial advocacy even in the most recent 
handbooks), since every midwife knows, that even the strongest and 
healthiest children do not always soil their napkins within the first few 
hours after birth, and this the most paltry of medical observations is 
sufficient criticism for this so-called '^ test.'^ Any given child may, 
therefore, have lived three, six, ten or more hours, and may yet 
when dissected have its bladder and rectum, or at least one of these 
organs, filled. Or the child may have passed water and its bladder 
have been refilled, and be thus found on dissection. In other cases, 
the empty condition of both or either of these organs does not de- 
pend upon evacuation during life, but upon mechanical pressure 
applied to the abdomen during the birth, or in the manipulation of 
the body after death in unclothing or transporting it, as for instance 
readily happens in the bodies of female children, whose urine is very 
easily made to flow by pressure upon the region of the bladder. It 
is therefore perfectly right that no mention should be made of this 
absurd mode of proof in the " Eegulations,^' and I may, moreover, 
warn the medical jurist that this test mmt not be employed as 
adjuvant jproof of life having existed or the reverse, even in con- 
junction with other proofs, for it has no foundation or basis to rest 
upon, and the public prosecutor or advocate for the defence would 
justly find in its employment only a lever wherewith to demolish the 
medical opinion of the case. Of course I do not require to say, that 
the examination of the bladder and rectum of newborn children on 
account of other appearances that may possibly be present, must 
never be omitted at that, any more than at any other age. 

§ 102. EcCHYMOSES. 

The proof of extra-uterine life afforded by the existence of ecchy- 
moses anywhere on the body of a newborn child, whidi was very 



88 . S 102. ECCHYMOSES. 

highly estimated by the ancients, and is by no means everywhere 
rejected by the modems, rests upon the supposition, that the escape 
of blood from the vessels presupposes its circulation through them ; 
consequently the existence of life. But in this instance also the 
commonest daily experience of a mere midwifery practice has been 
set aside in favour of an h priori dogma. This phenomenon, how- 
ever, irrespective of its significance in relation to the question of 
life, is of not less importance in another point of view, inasmuch 
as when once these ecchymoses were recognised as proof of life 
having existed after birth, they were then, especially when the blood 
was more or less coagulated, regarded with equal certainty as the result 
of the employment of external violence. A two-fold error fraught 
with the most serious consequences ! Nothing can be of less 
importance as evidence of the pre-existence of respiratory life, than 
any extravasation of blood which may happen to be found in the 
body. Mere exudation through the walls of the vessels ; also, of 
course, rupture of the smaller vessels from putrefaction, with escape 
of their contents into the neighbouring tissues, explains the very 
frequent appearance of more or less considerable, often very exten- 
sive, extravasations of blood, particularly on the heads of children 
born putrid, in whose case, therefore, there could be no possible 
doubt as to the fact of intra-uterine death. Not less frequently, 
also, the rupture of vessels during labour, which need not neces- 
sarily be laborious, gives rise to actual ecchymoses, particularly 
under the scalp in the well-known form of the caput succedaneum. 
This cranial tumour seems much more frequently than is supposed 
not to be of a purely oedematous character, but actually to consist 
at bottom of a more or less copious extravasation of blood, which is 
only rapidly absorbed in those children which continue to live ; and 
this I am justified in assuming to be the case from the constancy 
with which such extravasations are found at our medico-legal 
dissections. These are most commonly found in the cellular tissue 
beneath the epicranial aponeurosis in the form of a gelatinous clot 
which lies upon, or, in rarer cases, beneath i\it pericranium. A more 
exact description of these extravasations will be found in § 109. I 
cannot too stringently warn against the error, which as I happen to 
know from my official position is by no means rarely to be met with, 
of at once assuming this phenomenon to be the result of violence 
applied externally, or of the fall of the child on the floor at its 
birth. Inexperienced persons are specially easily led to make this 



5 103. VALUE OF THE DOCIMASIA PULMONARIS. 89 

induction when they find coagnla in these ecchymoses, and blood 
coagula in these subaponeurotic cranial ecchymoses are the very 
commonest of phenomena. 1 need not recapitulate here the opinions 
I have already (§ 11, Gen. Div., p. 23, Vol. I.) advanced in op- 
position to the erroneous dogma that blood does not coagulate after 
death, and which I have there supported by facts (Cases III. to 
IX.). And no one who has had occasion to dissect only a few such 
bodies * will be inclined to deny that such extravasations of blood, 
both fluid and coagulated, also occur very frequently in the bodies 
of children unquestionably born dead or even putrid. To this 
category also belong those rare cases in which children are bom 
dead with the umbilical cord wound round their necks, and with a 
few actual ecchymoses — proved to be such by incision — ^in the mark 
of the cord, affording thereby another example of pre-respiratory 
extravasation of blood, also the cases already described (§ 40, Spec. 
Div., p. 124, Vol. II.) of capillary (petechial) ecchymoses beneath 
the pulmonary pleura, upon the aorta, heart, and pericardium in 
children which have indubitably died before their birth. Extbavasa- 

TIONS OF BLOOD, EVEN IP COAGULATED, ARE NOT OP THE SLIGHTEST 

value as peoop that eespiratoey lipb has existed in any 
given child. 

§ 103. Conclusions as to the probative value op the 
docimasia pulmonaris. 

The medical jurist is perfectly justified, and may assume with a 
clear conscience and perfect unconcern as to the results of his 
opinion, that a child has certainly lived during and after its birth — 

1. When the diaphragm stands between the fifth and sixth ribs ; 

2. When the lungs more or less completely occupy the thorax, or 
at least do not require to be sought for by artificial separation of 
the walls when cut through ; 

3. When the ground colour of the lungs is broken by insular 
marblings ; 

4. When the lungs are found by careful experiment to be capable 
of floating; 

• Elsasser (op. ctt p. 62) relates a case in which there was not only a 
coagtdated extravasation beneath the cranial aponeurosis, but also a fluid 
one beneath the pericranium, besides a fissure of the skull, and in which the 
forceps were not applied till after the child was certainly dead. Vide also 
Maschka's case, detailed in § 108. 



90 § 104. WHEN IS THE LUNG TEST SUPERFLUOUS? 

5. When a bloody froth flows from the cut surfaces of the lung 
upon slight pressure. 

Though the foregoing criteria must be regarded as complete proof, 
yet this may admit of being strengthened by others, such as the state 
of the umbilicus, the osseous nucleus, &c., particularly in those 
cases in which from the nature of the case, as from the kind of 
death, the degree of putrefaction, &c*, certain of the criteria just 
detaQed may be so altered as only to permit of a more or less posi- 
tive opinion being formed from them ; but all this has been already 
considered in the preceding paragraphs. Isolated cases will occa- 
sioially occur in which the medical jurist will require to employ 
both prudence and tact in support of the doctrines 1 have just 
laid down. 

§ 104. When is tHB Instxtution op the Docimasia pttlmonaris 

Superfluous ? 

Since the docmasia pnlmonaris is intended to supply an answer 
to the query — Has this child lived after its birth? it will always 
occur to the phyacian to inquire, in the first place — whether from 
the bodily conformation of the child it could have lived, that is, 
have continued to live — ^been viable ? In those countries where, as 
in Prussia, the penal code does not recognise either viability or 
unviability in any case, it appears to be superfluous ever to raise this 
prdiminary question, since, sirictly speaking, every foetus must be 
presupposed to be viable. I do not require to point out here the 
absurd consequences which would result from such a conclusion. 
In fact, however, the opinions of individual judges vary very much 
upon this point, as I have had frequent practical opportunities of 
discovering when making medico-legal examinations in the presence 
of the usual law authorities. The physician must therefore always 
ascertain wheth^ the presiding law official is willing to accept his 
statement that the child has been unviable, and therefore does not 
require any further medico-legal examination (including the dod- 
masia pulmonaris), or whether the law official requires that the 
dissection be proceeded with notwithstanding the unviability, in 
which case it must of course {Fide p. 88, vol. I.) be carried out. 
In the first case the docimasia pulmonaris, even when its carrying 
out is not rendered impossible, will be omitted : 1st, in the case of 
all foetuses of less than 180 days intra-uterine life {Rhenish Civil 



§ 104. WHEN IS THE LUNG TEST SUPERFLUOUS ? 91 

Code, art. 812), in all those countries in which, as in the Prussian 
Common Law, the 210th day is appointed by statute as the termi- 
ntis h quo viability commences, in all foetuses under this age, as well 
as in all those monsters whose viability is rendered impossible by 
congenital malformation. 2. A child, in which the umbilical cord 
is already separated and the umbilicus cicatrized, is no longer a 
newborn one, and tiie institution of the docimcuna ptdmonaris would 
in such a case be perfectly superfluous. 3. This experiment would 
be equally superfluous should, before opening the chest, indubitable 
proof of life after biith be found in the abdomen. I ref«r to the 
proof of the positive active existence of the digestive function in 
the discovery of coagulated or half-coagulated milk in the stomach. 
For very obvious reasons this appearance will only be found in the 
very rarest instances of truly judicial cases ; but cases nevertheless 
frequently occur in which cluldren one whole day or even two days 
old, and already fed, have died from natural causes, and have then 
been, for various reasons, often only to save the burial charges, con- 
cealed and thrown aside, in such cases the condition of the stomach 
afPords of itself the most conclusive proof of the fact of the child 
having lived. 4. Of course there is not the sUghtest necessity for 
instituting the docimasia puhnonaris when it indubitably appears 
from the condition of the body that the child has been long dead in 
utero ; that it has been bom putrid. It is impossible to mistake the 
appearance of u child horn put/rid. The swollen cutis, the vesicular 
elevation of the cuticle or its complete peeling ofT, the greyish-green 
coloration of the body, the putrid navel-string, the well-known 
stench, &c., do not constitute the diagnosis, since every child even 
when bom aUve undergoes these putrefactive changes in their turn 
at the proper time after its death. On the contrary, most of these 
characteristics are not exhibited by a child bom putrid, and the 
putrefactive maceration in the warm liquor amnii is so very different 
in its operation &om putrefaction extemal to the utems, that it pro- 
duces an appearance so specific as to be unmistakably recognised 
whenever it has been once or twice seen. In the first place, a child 
born putrid is remarkable for its penetrating stench, which cannot be 
hidden or concealed by a thin coffin or chest, &c., and which though 
so repidsive and indestractible, is yet not the usual well-known 
odour of putrefying bodies, but has something sweetish, stale, and 
undescribable about it which makes it all the more unendurable. 
The difference in the general colour of the skin in the two classes of 



92 § 105. HOW LONG HAS THIS CHILD LIVED ? ETC. 

children, is still more remarkable. A child born putrid has not a 
shade of green upon its skin, but is more or less of a coppery red, 
here and there of a pure flesh colour. Peeling of the cuticle is 
never absent, but close to recent patches of this character older ones 
are found upon the body, the bases of which are already dark and 
hardened. The excoriated patches are moist, greasy, and con- 
tinually exude a stinking sero-sanguinolent fluid, which soaks through 
all the coverings of the body. The general form of such bodies is 
quite as remarkable as their colour. Whilst every highly putrefied 
corpse always preserves for long the roundness of the contour of the 
body, though its form is disfigured and distorted by intumescence, it 
must strike every one when a child bom putrid is placed before him, 
how great a tendency is displayed by it to flatten out and, as it were, 
fall to pieces. Thorax and abdomen lose their roundness, their 
contour forms an ellipse, from the soft parts sinking outwards 
towards both sides. The head itself, the bones of which are loose 
and moveable as in every child^s body, becomes flattened and the face 
thereby repulsively disfigured, as the nose is flattened and the cheeks 
fall to opposite sides. It is impossible accurately to describe the ap- 
pearance of such a child, and it is not worth while to append an exact 
representation true to nature, since the sketch here given as accurately 
as possible is sufficient to characterise a child born putrid. A body 
which exhibits such appearances shows infallibly that the child has 
died within the womb, and consequently that any further medico- 
legal examination, including the docimasia pulmonaris, is perfectly 
superfluous. I have already (§ 94, p. 74, Vol. III.), stated that this is 
never to be omitted from any fear of its insufficiency in the case of 
the bodies of children putrefied in the ordinary way. 

§ 105. How LONG HAS THIS ChILD LIVED, AND HOW LONG IS IT 
SINCE IT DIED? 

The presiding law official is in the habit of putting both of these 
questions to the medical inspectors at the time of the dissection, for 
the purpose of completing the summary opinion, after they have de- 
clared that the child has lived. The answer to the first question 
possesses a judicial interest, from the restriction of the term — Infan- 
ticide—to the killing of a child " during, or immediately after, its 
birth /^ the answer to the latter question is of special importance to 
the Judge in the case of the bodies of unknown children (which 
constitute the larger proportion of such bodies), because it of course 



§ 105. HOW LONG HAS THIS CHILD LIVED ? ETC. 93 

coincides with the time of the mother's delivery, if the child have 
lived but a very short time, and the Judge acquires from the opinion 
of the medical inspectors a basis upon which to act in regard to the 
public summoning and examination of those suspected of maternity, 
&c. — ^The answer to both queries is chiefly to be found in the cir- 
cumstances connected with each individual case. If the child have been 
viable, strong, and healthy, and there be no ground for supposing 
that there was any peculiar hinderance to the respiration immediately 
after birth, then respiration with all its consequences observable in 
the body must have been completely established in the shortest possi- 
ble time, and it will not be possible to distinguish whether the child 
has Hved half-an-hour or two or three hours. But this short dura- 
tion of life is of importance in criminal jurisprudence because of the 
words " immediately after its birth." Should the child have lived 
longer, perhaps from two to three days, then, in order to answer this 
question, the signs of recent birth require to be considered. In regard 
to this point I have already given the necessary details in § 77 p. 8, Vol. 
Ill, Important errors in the estimation of this may be avoided by 
proper attention, since the whole period comprised under this head is 
very short. In regard to the second question : How long has this child 
been dead ? All those various circumstances require to be considered, 
as in those ordinary difficult questions in regard to the period of death 
and the progress of putrescence, which are much the same in newborn 
children as at other ages, and which have been already gone into, in con- 
siderable detail, and to this I must now refer."^ The medical inspectors 
will be more easily enabled to form their opinion when they learn where 
and how the body of the child has been found — ^in bed ? in a warm 
or a cold room ? in a cellar ? in water ? in the earth ? naked ? shut in 
a box? &c.— further, when and how long before the time of the dis- 
section the body has been found, and where it has lain during the 
intervening period? &c. Questions which the medical inspectors 
are perfectly entitled to put, and which no judge will refuse to answer. 
When to these is added a knowledge of the atmospheric temperature 
prevailing at the time, and also of the kind of death suffered by the 
child, and when a general knowledge of those circumstances already 
so fully detailed is possessed, then it will be possible to give a 
general, at least approximatively correct, estimation of the time 
without much difficulty, and this will of course be all the nearer to 
the exact truth the greater the amount of practical experience 
possessed by the medical inspectors. 

♦ Gen. Div. Chapter II., §§ 7-22, p. 14, &o. vol. i. 



94 } 106. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

§ 106. Illustrative Cases. 

Cases 337-352. — Docimasla pulmonaris careied out where 
the bodies were already highly putrefied. 

From the very lai^ number of instances in which I have 
instituted the docimasia pulmonaris on the bodies of newborn 
children, which constitute in BerUn almost the fourth part of the 
annual number of the medico-legal dissections, I shall now proceed 
to detail a few selected cases, in which the dissection and experiments 
were conducted in accordance with the principles I have just laid 
down, and under circumstances which usually, but unjustly, would 
be considerate to contra^indicate the institution of this test. A 
medical jurist is not, however, justified in rejecting any mode of proof 
because it msLj possibly po longer be able to contribute to the deter- 
mination of the facts of the case. For my own part I have often 
succeeded in obtaining for the Judge, even in the case of the bodies 
of children completely putrefied, an amount of information such as 
could never be attained in any other way than by the much 
maligned docimasia pulmonaris. 

CCCXXXVII. — ^A mature foetus, highly putrefied, and abeady of 
a greyish-green colour, was found in the water. All the organs, even 
the lungs, were completely strewn with the bullse of putrescence. 
These latter were dense, of a dark-brown colour, no bloody froth 
escaped from incisions made into them, and &ey sank completely in 
water both when entire and when cut in pieces. 

CCCXXXVIII. — ^Precisely the same was the case with a female 
child also found in the water. The body was grey, the epidermis 
everywhere peeled off, the lungs retracted, dark brown, not marbled, 
dense. Every portion of them sank completely. 

CCCXXXIX. — The body of this male newborn foetus found in 
the water was in a very advanced state of putrefaction and completely 
emphysematous. The diaphragm was placed about the fourth rib, 
the lungs were dark brown, leathery, did not cover the pericardium, 
and sank completely. 

CCCXL. AND CODXLI. — ^In the two following remarkable cases 
the results were very peculiar. The body of a mature female child, 
already blackish-green from putrefaction, was found in the water ; 
the lungs were well-preserved, firm, dark brown, and did not crepi- 
tate. The heart, plentifully beset with putrefactive bullse, floated ; the 



§ 106. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 95 

liver, steel-grey, and pultaceous from patrescence. Boated, bnt the 
lungs, even to their smallest pieces, sank completely. Similar results 
were obtained in the case of an eighth-month foetus, which was 
found, in the heat of summer, in a dry pit, and still united to the 
placenta. In the first place I may remark, that the umbilical cord 
was mummified throughout its entire length! {Fid. §99, p. 83, 
Vol. III.) The foetus was quite putrid and almost black. The lungs 
were of a bright-red colour, but were not marbled, and they sank, 
whilst the heart floated. In all these cases we had no difficulty in 
assuming it to be certain that the children had been bom dead, since 
no other supposition was justifiable. 

OCCXLII. — ^In the following interesting case the results obtained 
were not such as to justify a positive opinion. A mature male 
child was found in the water enclosed in a bag loaded with stones. 
The body was green from putrescence. There were many gaseous 
bullae in the lungs, the result of decomposition ; the left lung was 
completely retracted, the right one filled about one-half of the pleural 
cavity. No crepitation was heard on making incisions into them, 
and a little putrid blood flowed out of the cut surfaces. They floated 
together with the heart, but the heart itself, the whole lower lobe of 
the right lung and isolated portions of the left one, sank. The liver, 
however, floated. The diaphragm was placed at the fourth rib. The 
trachea was empty and brown from putridity. The stomach con- 
tained a teaspoonful of bloody mucus. The urinary bladder was 
empty, the rectum filled. The partial floating of the lungs might 
very reasonably be ascribed to their state of putrescence, yet 
though several important symptoms pointed to the likelihood of the 
child having been bom dead, it was impossible to deny that respira- 
tion might possibly have been temporarily established. Accordingly 
we gave it as our opinion that the child had " probably " not lived 
subsequent to its birth, but had been bom dead. 

In contradistinction to these cases, I now proceed to relate another 
selection, in which the lungs floated notwithstanding the advanced 
state of general putrescence, and in which this floating, taken in 
connection with other concurrent criteria, permitted a decided 
opinion being given to the Judge. 

CCCXLIII. — A mature newborn child found lying dead upon the 
street. Highly putrid. The lungs of a rosy-red marbled with blue, 
copiously strewn with the gaseous bullae of decomposition. They 
completely filled the cavity of the thorax and floated perfectly. The 



96 S 106. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

heart, however, and liver too floated from their advanced state of 
putrefaction. In spite of this, we gave it as our opinion that from 
the concomitance of the marbling of the lungs, their volume and 
buoyancy, there was ^^ the greatest probability '^ that the child had 
been born alive. 

CCCXLIV. — A. mature female child found in the water, and 
already so far advanced in putrefaction that the little body was of a 
greyish-green colour. The colour of the right lung was a marbled 
rosy-red, that of the left one a brown-red. Both were strewn with 
gaseous bullae j both of them, even the dark-coloured left one, 
floated perfectly not only when entire, but also when cut in pieces. 
Neither a sound of crepitation nor frothy blood were remarked on 
making incisions into the lungs, the absence of the latter was 
sufficiently explained by the high degree of putrescence. There was 
no water in the trachea, lungs, or stomach. The urinary bladder was 
empty, the rectum and large intestine fully distended with meco- 
nium. In accordance with these interesting and unusual appear- 
ances, we were obliged to give it as our opinion ^' that the child had 
probably breathed for a short time, but that the results of the 
dissection afforded no distinct conclusions as to the nature of 
its death/^ 

(XCXLV. — This male child was found in the Spree perfectly 
putrid, and with its cranial bones already burst. The lungs were 
however well preserved. They completely filled the thorax, were 
both of a marbled rosy-red, both plentifully strewn with gaseous 
bullse, and both floated perfectly. But the thymus gland also 
floated ; the (empty) heart, however, did not do so. In this case 
incisions into the lungs produced a sound of crepitation and gave 
vent to a small quantity of bloody froth. On account of the 
putrescent condition of the lungs, the life of this child could only be 
assumed as "in the highest degree probable,'' while, of course, no 
opinion as to the cause of death could be given. 

CCCXLVI. — ^A mature child found in a privy. Greyish-green 
from putrescence, with peeling of the cuticle. The lungs were of a 
brownish-red with many bright patches of mottling. They floated 
perfectly. The diaphragm was placed beneath the sixth rib. The 
trachea, oesophagus, and stomach were empty. The heart contained 
no blood. The brain was pultaceous from decomposition. It was 
assumed that the child had lived, but also that it had probably been 
dead before being thrown into the cesspool, as there was no trace of 



S 106. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 97 

suffocation in excrement. This probability was afterwards ascertained 
to be correct, 

CCCXLVn.— ^A mature female child, grey from putrescence, the 
diaphragm high, between the third and fourth ribs. The colour of 
the lungs a bright brownish-red, marbled with blue. On both the 
right and the left lung there were gaseous bullse the size of half a bean, 
and the size of millet-s^ds along the edges of both the lower lobes. 
Both lungs floated perfectly, and nqt only crepitated upon incision, 
but also gave vent to much frothy blood, which was certainly re- 
markable considering the advanced at^te of putrefaction of the body. 
There was considerable cerebral hypersemia and an extravasation of 
blood one line thick between the pericranium and the bones. The 
sinuses were much congested. The urinary bladder was enjpty, the 
rectum distended. We assumed that the child was mg^ture, had 
lived affcer its birth, and bad died fpom jipople^y from some 
unascertajnable cause, 

CCCXLVIII. — It was very remarkable to find at the inspection 
of this mature male child, which was found lying dead upon the 
street, with its body green from putrescence, that a flat stripe, soft to 
cut, and two lines broad, ran across the bead from the occiput for» 
wards across both ears and ossa zygomatica, being finally lost on the 
face ; over the right parietal bone this stripe was of a brownish^red, ^ 
but unecchymosed, everywhere else it was quite soft. The diaphragm 
stood between the fourth and fifth ribs. The lungs were of a 
reddish-brown, marbled with a faint blue ; there were gaseous buUse 
on the posterior surface of the right lung and on the upper edge of 
the left one. Incisions into the pulmonary substance gave vent both 
to crepitation and bloody froth. Both lungs floated perfectly. The 
heart was empty. Cerebral hyperaemia was still distinctly recog- 
nisable. We gave it as our opinion that the child had lived affcer its 
birth and had died from apoplexy ; further, that the dissection revealed 
no appearance of any violence which might have been the occasion 
of this, and that the mark described had no connection with the 
death of the child, and had been occasioned by some bandage which 
most probably had been applied after death. 

COCXLIX. — A mature newborn child was removed from a cess- 
pool in the end of May. The body was already of a greyish-green, 
the cuticle peeled off, and the remains of the navel-string, two inches 
long, torn across and not tied, were mummified. Upon the occiput 
beneath the occipital aponeurosis there was, as is so frequently the 
VOL. in. H 



98 S 1Q6. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

case, a bloody coagulum, evidently the result of the act of birth ; 
there was no appearance of any violence upon the body. The lungs 
were of a dark brownish-red colour, with distinct brighter red mar- 
blings. Here and there on both lungs there were gaseous buDse 
the size of millet-seeds or beans. Repeated incisions into their 
substance gave vent not only to crepitation, but also to bloody froth. 
They floated perfectly and in every part. The position of the dia- 
phragm was between the fifth and sixth ribs. We gave it as our 
opinion that the child had lived after its birth, and further, that the 
dissection had revealed no reason for supposing its death to have 
been produced by violence. 

CCCL. — The body of a female child was taken out of the water 
and brought before us for examination, with a piece of string tied 
loosely round its neck, all its measurements, whether of diameter or 
otherwise, as well as its weight, showed it to be perfectly mature, yet 
the diameter of its osseous nucleus was only one line. It was 
greyish-green from putrescence. The navel-string was sixteen 
inches long and had not been tied. There was not a trace of any 
reaction from the string round the neck. The diaphragm was placed 
between the fifth and sixth ribs* The lungs completely filled the 
thorax, they were of a bright brownish-red colour, with only a few 
faint marblings visible upon them. In this case also, there were 
many gaseous bullse upon the periphery of the lungs, paiiicularly on 
their basis. They crepitated on being incised, but no bloody froth 
escaped ; in regard to this, however, their advanced state of putrefac- 
tion must be taken into account. The lungs floated perfectly, but 
so also did the heart and Uver; This case was not such as to permit 
the deliverance of any decided opinion, but neither did it preclude any 
opinion at all being given. Having due regard to the position of the 
diaphragm, the colour and volume of the lungs, as well as their 
buoyancy on the one hand, and on the other to the undeniable 
effects of putrefaction in the lungs and the buoyancy possessed by 
both the heart and the liver, we gave it as our opinion : that though 
there was no certainty, yet there was the greatest probability that 
the child had lived. In regard to the string round its neck, we had 
no difficulty in declaring that it must have been applied subsequent to 
death. We afterwards learned that the body had been fished out 
of the watef by means of a stick to which the string had been 
attached ! 

CXXJLI.— In the following case the colour of the lungs was quite 



§ 106. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 99 

remarkable, and they floated solely from their state of decomposi- 
tion. This female foetus was taken out of the water and was from 
all its measurements, &c., evidently only an eight-months' child, it 
also had no osseous nucleus. Putrescence was very far advanced. 
The position of the diaphragm was at the intercostal space between 
the fourth and fifth ribs. The lungs were of a bright cinnabar-red, 
without any traces of either blue or brownish markings. They were 
much retracted. There was no appearance of any bloody froth on 
making incisions. Qtiseous bullfle the size of millet-seeds were 
starewn over their whole periphery. The lungs, the thymus, the 
heart and the Uver, floated perfectly. These appearances were suffi- 
cient to induce us to state that the child must have been bom dead. 
CCCLII. — A newborn female child was found firmly sewn in a 
sack and lying on the street during the heat of summer. It was 
unquestionably mature (twenty inches in length, six pounds and 
three-quarters in weight, &c.) ; the osseous nucleus was only two 
lines in diameter, the body was of a greyish-green, the cuticle almost 
entirely peeled off. The diaphragm was placed at the seventh rib. 
The liver was black; strewn with large gaseous bulke, and floated. 
The spleen and kidneys were pultaceous. The stomach brownish-red 
from putrefaction and empty. The urinary bladder was empty; 
there was a^uantity of meconium in the large intestine and rectum. 
The vena cava was empty. The lungs completely filled the thorax, 
they were of a dirty livid rosy-red and marbled, thickly strewn with 
many gaseous bullae. They crepitated strongly under the knife, and 
in spite of the great general putrefactive anaemia there was a distinct 
escape of bloody froth from the incisions. They floated perfectly. 
There was a cciput succedaneum ; not a trace of any injury. We 
gave it as our opinion that the child had hved ; we could not, how- 
ever, answer the judicial query as to the length of time the child had 
lived, except in so far as the answer is comprised in that to another 
question of the Judge : viz., that the child could not have lived 
many days after its birth, which was indubitable.* 

Cases CCCLIII. to CCCLXV.— Paetial Sinking and Floating 
ot the lun63. 

The cases here collected together are a few of those comparatively 
rare cmes, in which only one lung, or in which considerable portions 

• Tufe also Case CCCLXXin. 

H2 



100 5 106. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

of one or both lungs float, while the rest sink. As the hydrostatic 
test by itself is incapable of affording satisfactory evidence in regard 
to the preexistence of life, so in such cases as those that follow 
this question must be decided by the other appearances found in 
the body. 

(XCLin. — ^A perfectly putrid female child was found in a canal. 
It was sixteen inches long, and weighed three pounds seven ounces 
and a-half ; we declared it to be a six months^ foetus. No injuries were 
visible. On the right lung there were gaseous bullae, on the left 
not ; the former floated, the latter sank. But when cut in pieces, only 
four portions of the right lung floated, while all the rest sank. Neither 
crepitation nor bloody froth were perceptible on making incisions 
into either lulig. The colour of the lungs was a brownish-red, 
without any marbling. The general aneemia of the body was easily 
explicable by the advanced state of putrefaction in which it was. 
We gave it as our opinion that ^^most probably ^^ the child had not 
lived. 

CCCLIV, — ^It was ascertained that this mature male child was 
delivered by the forceps after a severe labour, and shortly after died 
from apoplexy. As is usual in such cases, the traces of the forceps 
were distinctly visible upon the body. On the forehead, and at the 
root of the nose, there were hard leathery portions of excoriated cutis, 
and a precisely similar patch upon the occipital protuberance. There 
was an extravasation of blood beneath the occipital aponeurosis. The 
vessels of the pia mater were much congested and the whole of the 
basis cranii had a layer of dark treacly blood spread over it, which 
is certainly a rare appearance. The right lung was of a bright 
brown colour with reddish patches on it, the left lung was of one 
uniform dark brown. On incising the right lung a faint sound of 
crepitation was heard, and a little bloody froth escaped ; there was 
nothing of the kind seen or heard on cutting into the left one. The 
right lung floated perfectly, all but a few pieces which sank, and 
compression under water caused the usual pearly vesicles to ascend ; 
the left lung sank completely. It was therefore evident that the 
right lung alone had commenced to respire. 

CCCLV. — ^A case possessing a most unusual interest in regard to 
the docimasia pulmonaris. A mature female child (with an osseous nu- 
cleus of two lines) was found one evening in spring lying dead upon the 
floor of a house. Three days subsequently it was placed upon our 
dissectmg-table, already greyish-green. The diaphragm was placed 



§ 106. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 101 

between the fourth and fifth ribs. Gaseous bullae were scattered 
through the thymus. The lungs were retracted. The left was of a 
uniform brown colour, the right of a bright rosy-red with a few 
bluish marblings. When the yet unseparated heart and lungs were 
laid upon the surface of the water, they sank but slowly, and from 
this it was to be expected that individual portions of the lungs would 
float when they came to be separated. The weight of the right lung 
was four hundred and ninety grains, that of the left only three hundred 
and ninety. When separated, the right lung floated, but when de- 
pressed beneath the surface it rose unusually slowly ; the left lung 
sank at once to the bottom. When further divided into lobes, only the 
upper lobe of the right lung floated, while the others slowly sank. The 
two lobes of the left lung sank slowly. Finally, when cut into Httle 
pieces, only about a fourth part of the right lung was found to be 
buoyant, while only three pieces of the left lung kept the surface of the 
water. No other organ floated. The- lungs were not in the smallest de- 
gree putrid, and I may add that the right one crepitated, and gave vent 
to a small quantity of bloody froth when cut into, the left one did 
neither. Evidently the child had made a few attempts to breathe ; a 
small amount of inspired air had as usual got into the right lung, 
while a stiU smaller quantity had also got into the left one, and an 
apoplectic attack, the traces of which were distinctly visible, had 
ended its life immediately after its birth. 

CCCLVI. — A mature female child was drawn out of a stream in 
July by means of a hook driven through its scalp. Its far-advanced 
state of putrefaction led to the conclusion that it must have re- 
mained for weeks in the water, for the head was black and broken 
up, the trunk green, and the cuticle peeled oflf. The diaphragm was 
placed beneath the fifth rib. The lungs were of a bright-brownish 
colour, here and there faintly marbled ; they filled the thorax, but 
were strewn with numerous gaseous buUse. Incisions into their 
substance gave vent to no sound of crepitation, or bloody froth, the 
high degree of putrefaction, however, readily explained the latter. 
They floated, all but four pieces of the left and two of the right 
lung, which sank. No other organ was buoyant. In this state of 
matters we gave it as our opinion ^^ that the child had probably Uved 
for a short time after its birth,'^ as this idea alone seemed to reconcile 
the partially contradictory results of the dissection. Of course it is 
evident that in this, as in every other similar case, not even a pro- 
bable idea could be formed as to the cause of death. 



102 § 106. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

CCCLVn. — A case precisdy similar to the last. On the Ist of 
November the body of a male newborn child was found in a bush in 
a garden^ and was brought before us for dissection on the 5th, 
still quite fresh by reason of the cold harvest weather. The dia- 
phragm was placed between the fifth and sixth ribs. The lungs 
were brownish-red ; there were a few brighter patches on the right 
one, but none upon the left. The lungs while still united to the 
heart, sank. Separated from it, the whole of the right lung floated, 
the left one sank. When cut in pieces only four portions of the 
right lung sank, and the whole of the left. Accordingly the only 
opinion we could give with certainty was, that there had been a 
" short'' life subsequent to birth. 

OCCLVin. — ^In this case also only one of the liings floated, but 
the accompanying circumstances were diflferent This newborn boy 
was taken out of the Spree in June, the veritable representative of a 
body that had become quite putrid, and blackish-green in the water. 
The diaphragm stood high between the third and fourth ribs; the lungs 
were quite retracted, they were of a chocolate-brown colour without any 
brighter patches, and with many scattered gaseous bullse, which were 
particularly large and numerous upon the right one. The lungs and 
the heart, still united, floated ; when separated the right one floated, 
while the left sank. In neither of them did incisions give vent 
either to crepitation or to bloody froth. When cut in pieces the 
right lung remained completely buoyant while still one-half of the 
left one sank. In accordance with these results, it was evident that 
the trifling buoyancy possessed by the right lung depended solely 
upon its putrefied condition. Everything else discovered was in 
favour of the child having been bom dead, and this was assumed to 
have been the case. 

OCCLIX. — ^This child was found in the water at the ^d of 
August still attached to its placenta. The body was grey, whole of 
the cuticle peeled off. In regard to the dissection, it is sufficient to 
mention that the liver-coloured right lung sank, whilst the left, 
which was quite as brown and unmarbled, but completdy strewn with 
gaseous bullae, floated. The heart and liver floated. Evidently the 
floating of the one lung was in this case merely the result of 
putrefaction, therefore no opinion was given as to the life or death 
of the child after its birth. 

CXXHJX. — ^In this case, a partial sinking of the otherwise buoyant 
lungs was produced by hepatization. The child had died of pneumonia 



§ 106. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 103 

four days after its birth, and was, therefore, no longer a newborn 
one. Both lungs were partially hepatized (red), and all these por- 
tions sank in the water (as they always do), whilst the other por- 
tions, though they did not crepitate, yet floated. 

CCCLXI. — This was a rare case, it was that of a girl born in the 
eighth month, after an easy labour. Soon after its birth, the child 
had commenced to breathe with a loud rattling noise and to spit out 
blood, and died in the evening after living one day. Both lungs 
were of a very dark colour, and only the left one displayed several 
brighter and marbled patches. So great was the hypersemia, espe- 
cially in the right lung, that blood actually flowed from the smallest 
incisions. The hsemorrhagic effusion had completely destroyed the 
cells and rendered the parenchyma unrecognisable. Only the 
brighter portions of the left lung floated, the other portions, and the 
whole of the right lung sank, drawn down by the great mass of 
blood within them. Upon the heart there were many petechial 
ecchymoses the size of a lintseed. Its coronary vessels were turgid, 
but its cavities contained but little blood. This was certainly a 
very rare example of intense pulmonary apoplexy in a newborn 
child.-^ 

Cases CCCLXII. to CCCLXVT. — Artificial Inflation in 
Medico-legal Cases. 

I have already (p. 64, Vol. III.) pointed out, in consonance with 
general experience, that the possibility of the artificial inflation of 
the lungs of children bom dead cannot be tolerated as an objection 
in forensic practice, and why this should be so. Whenever the 
matter is thought upon it must at once appear that many phe- 
nomena significant of respiration, which might arise from this infla- 
tion, must be accompanied by numerous peculiarities. This was the 
case in the following five examples, which constitute the only ones 
belonging to this category which have come before us. 

CCCLXII. — A maidservant had secretly given birth to a child 
in her master^s house, and was immediately ordered out of it! 
She wandered about with her child in a cold damp February 
without a roof to shelter her, till she was admitted into an hos- 
pital. ' The child was dead ; she fancied, however, that she heard 

* For oases of floating of one limg |^d sinking of the other, vide also 
Cases CCXLIII. and CCCC. 



104 S 106. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

it cry but a short time before. Attempts to resuscitate the child were 
made by putting it into a warm bath and rubbing the body, but not 
by artificial inflation, as was specially mentioned in the evidence 
obtamed by the police. At the dissection the following were the 
appearances found relative to this matter: the position of the 
diaphragm was between the fourth and fifth ribs; the stomach and 
urinary bladder were empty ; a quantity of very dark meconium j 
inferior cava much congested ; the distended lungs were of a rosy- 
red, deeply marbled with blue ; incisions gave vent both to crepita- 
tion and bloody froth; they were perfectly buoyant; the heart was 
empty ; the trachea empty ; the brain hypersemic. In spite of the 
possibility, under the circumstances, that artificial inflation might 
have been resorted to in this case, yet in accordance with the 
principles that have been laid down in the text, we could not hesitate 
to declare that this child must have lived. Further, we declared that 
the child had died from cerebral apoplexy from some unascertain- 
able cause. 

COCXLIII.— This was an extremely intricate case, and if my 
opinion had not sufficed, and it had been brought before the different 
professional courts, it would have given rise to the most diverse 
opinions, which I willingly agree would have been perfectly justified 
by the peculiar circumstances of the case. An illegitimate female 
child was bom in the eighth month (without any osseous nucleus). 
According to its mother^s statement, which seemed on this point a 
little ha2y> it had never cried. Shortly afterwards a (very little 
known) physician was called in ; he found the child apparently life- 
less, and holding its nose attempted to inflate its lungs by blowing 
with his mouth directly into the child's. The dissection proved that 
this had not got into the stomach, since it was empty and collapsed 
as usual. The diaphragm was placed between the fourth and fifth 
ribs. The liver and vena cava contained much treacly blood. The 
right lung distended the thoracic cavity, the left one was retracted. 
Both lungs were of a decided bright brownish-red, mottled here and 
there ; to this the middle lobe of the right lung presented a remark- 
able contrast from its bright cinnabar-red colour, in which there was 
not a trace of mottling. Both lungs crepitated under the knife and 
emitted bloody froth very copiously. Both lungs were perfectly 
buoyant. The trachea was empty and perfectly normal. Withhi 
the cranium there was not only well-marked hypersemia but even 
small isolated patches of extravasation upon the base of the brain. 



{ 106. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 105 

"What ought to be deduced from these appearances and the known 
facts of the case ? The remarkable contrast presented to the rest of 
the lung by the unmottled cinnabar-red of the middle lobe of the 
right lung, a colour which is acquired always and without exception 
by lungs artificially inflated, evidently pointed to an attempt of this 
nature, which had been so far successful* While the light-brown 
colour of the rest of the lungs ; the mottlings> which though not 
numerous were still present; the perfect buoyancy of the lungs> which, 
as well as the entire body, were perfectly fresh, even to their smallest 
portions into which air akificially blown in could not have penetrated 
without of necessity altering the colour of the lungs ; for the same 
reason, the crepitation emitted by the air on escaping, and finally 
and specially, the large amount of blood contained in the lungs, 
which never could have got there by mere insu£Bation^-all decided 
me in coming to the conclusion that the child had been alive 
during and subsequent to its birth (and had died from apoplexy 
from a cause not revealed by the dissection), and in giving this 
opinion I did not exclude the possibility that air might have been 
artificially introduced into the lungs of the child after its death, 

CCCLXrV. — In this case the medico-legal examination took 
place by reason of suspected carelessness on the part of the midwife, 
in whose dwelling and under whose care a girl had been delivered of 
a mature male child (nineteen and a-half inches long> six pounds in 
weight, osseous nucleus only two lines). The labour was said to 
have lasted five hours, and the child, according to the declaration of 
the accused midwife, was bom dead. When, however, our opinion 
which was opposed to this idea, was subsequently brought under her 
notice, and it Was pointed out that in other respects it was favourable 
to her, the woman, who had been mtlch annoyed, recovered her 
composure, and explained in limitation of her former declaration, 
word for word as follows, " I cannot indeed state with certainty, 
whether the child may not have respired a few times after it was 
bom, because the coverlet of the bed prevented the immediate 
observation of the child instantly after its birth.'' The fact that the 
midwife had left the parturient female at the critical moment, and 
also that there were a few slight scratches found upon the head of the 
child, had given occasion to this inquiry. At the examination of the 
body she had declared that the child's head had been long delayed 
in the fourth position, that it had thus become swollen, and that the 
child had been bom dead. She then attempted to carry out the 



106 S 106. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

'' usual *' means of resuscitation^ " which consisted in that I first 
slapped the child^s bottom, gave it a warm bath, squirted water with 
a syringe upon the pit of the child's stomach, gave it several air- 
baths, and finally cut the cord, which no longer pulsated/' Subse- 
quently she corrected this statement by saying that she first attended 
to the cord, and then instituted the attempt at resuscitation, amongst 
which, ^^ as I previously forgot to mention,'' was included an attempt 
to ^^ breathe in" air by putting her mouth upon the child's. The 
case happened in the beginning of April, and the body was still 
quite fresh when brought before us. I may say at once that the 
pretended scratchings were nothing more than a small and perfectly 
unimportant ecchymosis upon the left parietal bone, which we de- 
clared to have been the result of the tedious labour. The diaphragm 
stood between the fifth and sixth ribs. The liver, spleen, and vena 
cava contained much blood; the stomach, urinary bladder and 
rectum were empty. The lungs filled the thoracic cavity tolerably 
well, the edge of the left one reached the anterior surface of the 
pericardium. Their colour was of a cinnabar red, and displayed, 
though only ^^ on a few isolated spots, a bluish mottling." They 
floated both with and without the heart, entire, and also when com- 
pletely cut in pieces, they crepitated under the knife and emitted 
much bloody froth ; the trachea was empty ; the right side of the 
heart contained no blood, the left one but a few drops. Of course 
the cranial swelling containing a blood coagulum, the veins of the 
pia mater and all the sinuses were much congested. For similar 
reasons as those expressed in the previous case, we gave a similar 
opinion in the following formula: that it must certainly be con- 
cluded that the child had lived during and after its birth; that it died 
from apoplexy, and that the appearances on dissection had not 
revealed any reason for supposing that any blame was attachable to 
the midwife in regard to the death of the child. 

CCCLXV. — In order to determine the suspected neglect of a 
midwife who had not appeared when summoned, we had to make a 
medico-legal examination of the body of a mature female child, 
which was stated to have been found suffocated and lying on its 
belly in bed beside its mother, a married woman, who had fainted. 
Another midwife, subsequently called in, found the child, some 
hours after its birth, lifeless; she, nevertheless, endeavoured to 
resuscitate it, and in doing so ''blew air thrice from her mouth into 
that of the child." It was at once evident that this procedure had 



S 106. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 107 

nothing to do with the appearancca found in the lungs. These were 
of a bright brownish-red, beautifully mottled; they were (edematous, 
contained a very great quantity of blood, almost entirely filled the 
thoracic cavity ; both of them displayed a few subpleural petechial 
ecchymoses; they had depressed the iaphragm to the fifth rib, and 
floated perfectly. The trachea was distinctly injected, and contained 
froth, and a secondary hyper»mia of the brain completed the proof 
that the child, bom alive, had died from suffocation. That it really 
had lain upon its belly seemed to be proved by the post-mortem 
stains which covered the anterior part of the body. 

COCLXVI. — ^This case (an extra-judicial one) was interesting from 
its being well known that air had been blown into the lungs, and 
also on account of' the numerous subpleural ecchymoses (p. 186, 
Vol. n.), which were larger in this case than I have ever seen them. 
This boy, weighing seven pounds and a-half, was suffocated during 
its birth (in the Maternity Hospital), and air immediately insufflated, 
which did not pass into the primse vise, but passed plentifully into 
the lungs. These almost completely distended the thorax, were 
entirely of a bright dnnabar-red, without one trace of mottling, 
and exhibited numerous laige subpleural air-bubbles, some of them 
the size of peas, others coalesced to a much larger size, evidently 
arising from rupture of the air-cells. On the right lung there were 
dart red ecchymoses, from the size of a pea to that of a fourjienny- 
piece ; there were also smaller ones upon the pericardium and even 
on the diaphragm. The lungs floated, of course, and perfectly, and 
this buoyancy, as well a^ the air-bubbles, could not, in this perfectly 
fresh body (in February, with a temperature of -1-^2 to ®5 E. = 
^86*5 to %S'25 P.), have arisen from putrefaction. 

In all these five cases the air was blown into the lungs by pro- 
fessional parties, and in four of them more or less air had actually 
got into the lungs. But from the peculiar concomitant circum- 
stances of these cases, which were of course at once made known, 
neither they, nor any similar ones, have any relation to the great mass 
of ordinary dissections of newborn children which give occasion for 
the institution of the docimasia pulmonasfi. 

Cases CCCLXVII. and CCCLXVIII. — Bladdee and Ebctum 

Test. 

Although I have already (§ 101, p. 86, Vol. III.) been compelled 



108 § 106. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

to deny to the so-called bladder- and rectum-l^st all and every pro- 
bative value, even that belonging to a mere assistant proof — although 
the cases already related afford sufficient evidence for the correctness 
of my opinion — still I shall here make room for two selected cases, 
because the life and death of these two newborn children were 
established previous to the dissection, in both cases, by witnesses 
present at the birth, the dissection having been carried out for other 
reasons, while both cases afford very striking evidence of the worth- 
lessness of these so-called criteria. 

CCCLXVII. — ^A mature female child was bom deady in the pre- 
sence of the other inmates of the house. A young physician de- 
nounced the assisting midwife, and declared that she had occasioned 
the death of the child by her neglect in prematurely leaving the 
parturient female. The diaphragm of the child stood between the 
third and fourth ribs. The liver brown and dense ; lungs, on being 
incised, gave vent neither to crepitation nor bloody froth, every por- 
tion of them sank completely, &c. ; the rectum was full, but the 
bladder contained not a drop of urine. 

CCCLXVIII. — Another mature female child was born in the 
presence of the relatives, but alive; it also cried, but speedily 
died from cerebral haemorrhage, as was discovered on dissec- 
tion (three drachms [imp.] of fluid blood were spread over the 
surface of the brain). An incompetent person, a so-called wiekeU 
frau (monthly nurse), had conducted the perfectly natural labour, 
and the case, therefore, came under the cognizance of the law. The 
docimasia pulmonaris proved most distinctly that respiration had 
been established ; but the bladder and rectum were both completely 
distended! 



CHAPTER HL 

KINDS OF DEATH PECULIAR TO NEWBORN CHILDREN. 

§107. — Qeneeal. 

The newborn child may die, as at any other age, either from 
natural or violent causes of every possible kind, from injuries of every 
kind, from strangling, drowning, burning, poisoning, &c. I have, 
however, already fully considered all these various causes of violent 
death in the previous chapters of this work, and it is not my inten- 
tion again to enter upon them in relation to newborn children, since 
these present no peculiarities in regard to them, and the diagnosis of 
death by strangulation or buming/&c., is essentially the same either in 
a newborn child or an adult. But the medical jurist has a direct and 
practical interest in such injuries and kinds of death as occur, and 
from their nature can only occur in newborn children, and also in 
iiho^e postmortem appearances which may lead to errors of diagnosis 
and erroneous opinions in regard to these injuries and kinds of death, 
and these specific injuries and kinds of death I shall now proceed to 
consider. My present observations shall, like those hitherto made, 
be specially based upon my own personal observations, made upon 
the bodies of nearly eighteen hundred newborn children, some of 
which were bom dead, and others had died shortly after birth, and 
which came before me in my official capacity either for inspection 
merely, or to be submitted to a complete medico-legal examination 
and dissection. These specific injuries and kinds of death may affect 
the child either before, during, or after its birth. 

§ 108. — ^Dbath of the Child peevious to its Birth. — ^Fatal 
Injukies in utero. 

'' Intentional killing* of the foetus in utero, by means applied 
externally (or internally),'^ by the mother or by a third party, with 
or without the consent, knowledge, or desire of the pregnant woman, 

• On the production of abortion, — vide Biological Division, Special Part, 
§38. 



110 DEATH PECULIAR TO NEWBORN CHILDREN. 

is pnnisliable according to the penal code (§§ 181, 182) with severe 
imprisonment in bridewell. The question thus arises, whether by 
'^ external means/^ taken in the widest signification of the words, 
including thus blows, kicks, things thrown against the pregnant 
woman, falls, fee, the foetus in tetero can be injured, and particularly 
whether it can thus be killed ? In the first place, in regard to the 
case of injuries (Jractures) of the extremities of the foetus, occasioned 
by the appUcation of external violence to the body of a pregnant 
woman, we cannot deny the causal connection of the two, inasmuch 
as well-observed cases exist in proof thereof. Such an occurrence, 
however, would only acquire a forensic interest should the profes- 
sional party engaged at the birth be accused of mala praxis, Hie 
nature of the fracture (as recent, provided with callus, fee), together 
with an accurate ascertainment of the nature of the labour, would in 
such a case be sufficient to guide the decision. Whether spontaneous 
firactures of the foetal extremities can be produced by muscular con- 
traction alone must be left to be decided by fature observations. In 
one case in which the pregnant woman had sustained several falls, 
and in which there were subsequently found several fractures of the 
very brittle bones, both of the superior and inferior extremities of the 
foetus, Herbert Barker,* the observer, considered that this sponta- 
neous produdion of the fractures was more probable than that they had 
been produced by the falls (and rightly so, if we consider the circum- 
stances). As a farther illustration of this, an observation of Murray^ sf 
is given, in which the seventh-month child of a syphilitic mother 
was bom with a fractured humerus and femur — without the inJUc- 
tion of any previous external injury upon the mother. But the 
occurrence of other and more fatal effects of violence inflicted on a 
pregnant woman can be just as little doubted as that of fracture of 
the bones of the extremities of the foetus, since simple concussion of 
the uterus and of the foetus may cause separation of the placenta 
with all its consequences, fatal concussion of the foetal brain, rupture 
of blood-vessels, or internal organs, &c. (Injuries to the foetus. by 
penetrating wounds of the abdomen of the mother are, of course, 
excluded from consideration here.) Finally, however, in regard to 
fatal cranial injuries to the foetus in utero, some doubt seems not 
unjustifiable when we consider — 1. The protection the cranium 
enjoys from bemg surrounded by the liquor amnii; 2. The sheltered 
position of the head w* utero ; 3. The readiness with which cranial 
• duoted in Schmidt's Jahrb., 1858, No. 8, s. 195. f he, cit. 



§ 108. FATAL INJURIES IN UTERO. Ill 

injuries received during labour or at birth may be mistaken for 
similar injuries received in utero (§ 110) ; 4. The well-known fre- 
quency and obstinacy with which mothers, when accused, deny all 
knowledge of any such violence inflicted upon their child at or after 
the birth; 5. The relatively very small number of existing observa- 
tions of fatal intra-uterine cranial injuries; and 6. The number of these 
relatively few cases which are found to be untrustworthy when criti- 
cally examined. The most ancient of such cases is that detailed by 
Valentin -^ — A pregnant woman was trodden on the side by a man 
during a scuffle. Fourteen weeks subsequently she was delivered of 
a healthy boy, and on the next day of a dead boy. '^ Cute a cranio 
separata in omnibm capitis ossibtis, v, g. osse frontis, osse syncipitis 
dextro et sinistra, osse occipiUs, rubicundoi qucsdam et sanguine suffuses 
maculce, grossi ant quartce Imperialis partis magnitudine repertce 
fuerunty qua tamen omnino recentes cum sanguine videhantur" 
( ? Yet the injury had happened a quarter of a year previously !) 
^^ Pariliter omnes sutures plus guam in recens natis observatur, dista- 
bant, ut ossa ad digiti latitudinem sibi invicem imponi potuerint." 
The foetus was, however, in an extreme degree of putrefaction!! 
For the liver was black, and so soft that ^^digitis comminui potuerit/' 
The lungs — at least the right one— was black, '^ ut partim putridi/* 
&c., and ^^ brachium dextrum latusgue dextrumfere nudum et cuticula 
destitutum videbantur, imo totum corpus ita pene constitutum erat !" 
We see, therefore, that this case is of no value, and does not in the 
least prove what it ought to, since every child bom putrid exhibits 
the same phenomena in a greater or less degree. Further, though we 
find Ploucquet's opinion quoted in favour of the occurrence of such 
cases, yet if we turn to the original,t we find, on the contrary, that 
though he quotes an observation from Gardner, and a second from 

* Corp,jur, med. leg, constana e PandectiSy ^c. Franco/, 1722. Fol. Pars I. 
Sect. II. Cas. 18. de contusione ahdomims in gravida, ahortum causante, 
Zittman (Med, For, Franco/. 1706, p. 1602) reports, indeed, another still 
older case (1699). It is, however, very defective in details, and is not, 
therefore, to be regarded as fully made out. The servant-maid had fallen 
(how or where not mentioned), and on the dead-bom child there were 
** sugillatio in/ronte et hrachio nniatro .'" Also " tumor " there, and of the 
" labii superioris.'* The Faculty at Leipzig, however, declared themselves 
unable to decide whether this child had died or been killed in utero or extra 
uterum. 

t AbhandL uber die gewaltsamen Todesarten., 2 Aufl. Tubingen, 1788, 
s. 281, &c. 



112 § 108. FATAL INJURIES IN UTERO. 

Glockengiesser, yet that lie himself expresses doubt upon the matter, 
and considers that the supposition of any such influence must be 
strictly limited. Grardner's case was pne of severe labour, in which 
the child was bom with a cranial tumour, and with fracture of the 
lumbar vertebrse, " It seemed as if this part of the child bad been 
injured, and to judge from the age of the child and its degree of 
putrescence, this must have happened at least one month before its 
birth. Wheu I asked the woman if she had mpt with any injury 
during her pregnancy, she answered that about two months previously 
she had received a violent blow upon the belly by falling on the edge 
of a large clothes'-basket.*' Thus the fall on the abdomen occurred 
two, and the injury one month before the child^s birth ! A severe 
labour, and a putrid foetus ! Probably the fracture of the vertebrae 
happened during the birth. Of Glockengiesser's case we only learn 
that " the cranium was broken into five pi^es,'^ but not a word more 
in regard either tp pregnancy or birth ! In the case published by 
Mende,"^ the faculty of Greifswald have declared in a very profound 
opinion dehvered by them " th^t the child had not received a fatal 
injury previous to its birth by external violence inflicted on the body 
of its mother, whereof it had died four days after its birth, but rather 
that the imperfect nature of the dissection and the extremely meagre 
account given by the midwife of the course of the labour, gave occa- 
sion to assume, not with perfect certainty, but with probability, that 
the child had received thes^ severe injuries, namely, the ecchymosis 
on the head, and the fracture of the right parietal bone, during the 
act of birth itself'^ 

In Alberfst case, in which the mother, two days before her con- 
finement, fell with her belly upon a boundary stone, the child was 
bom dead, and its left parietal bone, more ossified than usual, was 
separated from its connections with the bones around it. That por- 
tion usually united with the right parietal bone by the sagittal 
suture was separated throughout its entire length by a fissure eleven 
lines in breadth, so that the brain protmded, laid bare by the rupture 
of the membranes. The anterior and posterior edges of the parietal 
bones were separated from the contiguous bones, and somewhat 
depressed; the inferior edge was separated from the temporal bone, 
but protruded a few lines in front of it, and '^two-fingers^ breadth 
above its junction with the temporal bone it was scarcely perceptibly 
bent outwards. The bone itself was uninjured.^' The bone, there- 

• Henke's Zeitschr. &o. iii. s. 277, &o. f Ibidem, xviii. s. 441. 



§ 108. FATAL INJURIES IN UTERO. 113 

fore, though so thin, was partly depressed, partly bent outwards, and 
yet not fractured, though it " was more than usually ossified/' (?) 
What, however, is chiefly obnoxious to criticism in this case is, that 
we learn not one syllable as to the degree of putrescence of the child. 
Becher's case* was one of breech presentation, brought to a close 
with the forceps. Heyfelder's casef was also a forceps one I In 
Schmidt's case,t in which the mother received a violent blow upon 
the right side of the under part of the belly, the child was not born 
dead, but only apparently so, and it did not die till the following 
night. There was only a depression in the parietal region of the 
right frontal bone, the neighbourhood of which was neither ecchy- 
mosed, swollen, nor otherwise altered. At the dissection a little 
coagulated black blood was found at the most depressed portion of 
the bone; the bone itself was normal, and not discoloured. At the 
parietal edge close to the fontanelle there were two ^^ trifling fissures.'' 
This case is certainly more remarkable than the foregoing; any other 
explanation, however, of the origin of this depression is much mora 
probable than the supposed one of intra-uterine violence. Schnur's§ 
case is very like that just related ; it is also peculiarly instructive in 
a forensic point of view, because it shows that the foetus may remain 
alive even after the appUcation of extreme violence to the pregnant 
abdomen. The woman in the eighth month of her pregnancy fell 
against the sharp edge of a tub ; she fainted away, had haemorrhage 
from the vagina, and had to be leeched, &c. After forty-seven days 
she gave rapid and easy birth (her eighth) to a healthy living child, 
on whose right frontal bone, without any injury being visible on the 
skin, there was an almost starlike depression of two lines in diame- 
ter, which had quite disappeared three months subsequently. In 
Wittzack's || case, the mother fell from a tree, and three months 
subsequently the child was delivered by turning, with a mere im- 
pression on the frontal and left parietal bones ; it was born dead, 
and was not dissected. The case, therefore, permitted of this ex- 
planation. In regard, however, to mere depressions we must not 
forget the facts observed by such distinguished obstetricians as F. B. 
Osiander, Carus, d'Outrepont, Hohl, &c., which E, Gurlt in his mono- 

* Henke Zeitsohr. zxvi. s. 239. 

t Sohmidt's Jabrb. viii. 8. 125. 

X Neue Denksohr. der phys. med. Sooiet. zu Erlangen, 1812, i. s. 60. 

§ Med. Zeitung des Vereins fur Heilk. 1834, s. 152. 

II Ibid. 1841, No. 82. 

VOL. III. I 



114 § 108. FATAL INJURIES IN UTERO. 

graph"*^ has also nwst properly referred to, namely, ttat such depres- 
sions may and do arise quite independent of external violence, by the 
mere continuous pressure exerted on the foetal head during preg- 
' nancy by protruding lumbar vertebrsB or any osseous tumour, that 
this also may happen during the act of birth itself (§ 110), whereby 
eiVQVifracture^ of the cranium may occur during even easy births.t 
On the other hand, the two following cases, which were certainly 
veiy peculiar, are quite different from any of those already detailed. 
Blot J reported to the Academy at Paris the case of a primipara, 
aged twenty-seven, who, during labour, and before the rupture of 
the membranes, accidentally fell down two stories into the court- 
yard, whereby she had her th%h-bone broken, besides receiving many 
severe contusions. The child had now passed through the os uteri; 
much crepitation was felt on its head, and it was easily delivered 
with the forceps (dead). In the subcutaneous cellular tissue on the 
anterior part of the head there were many ecchymoses ; beneath the 
uninjured scalp there was an extravasation of black fluid blood upon 
both parietal bones beneath the pericranium ; there was a fracture of 
each parietal bone, which on the right one had separated a triangular 
piece of bone; there was no other injury either of the brain or the 
rest of the body. The case reported by Maschka§ is precisely similar 
to this one. A woman towards the end of the eighth month of her 
pregnancy leaped down from the second story, broke both her 
thigh-bones, apd died in six hours. On the foetus in uiero there were 
'' several fractures of both parietal bones with extravasation of blood 
and coagula^ both on the external surface and within the cranial 
cavity.'^ 

The two latter cases, in particular, compel us to assume that the 
chUd may he killed in utero hy injuries to its cranium^ produced by 
violence inflicted directly upon the body of the pregnant woman, or 
by any violent impression made generally upon it, as by leaping, 
falling, or bdaig thrown from a height, &c. The consideration that 
death from this cause is one of the rarest phenomena, while nothing 
is more common than the roughest usage of pregnant women with- 
out any iQ effect upon the foetus, will make the prudent medical 

• Ueber intra-uterine Yerletzangen (Separat-Abdruok aus den Verhand- 
lungen der Gesellsohaft f. Geburtshulfe zu Berlin), 1857, s. 29. 

t Vide oases by L*Hermitte, d'Outrepont u.A.. in der Prager 
Vierteljabrsobrift, 1857, i v. s. 111. t Q^urlt, he, cit 

§ Prager Yierteljahrschrift, 1856, Bd. lii. s. 105. 



§ 109. DEATH DURING LABOUIt-CEPHALHiEMATOMA. 115 

jurist cajreful not rashly to justify a murder committed after the 
child^s birth. Such cases in which the child is born dead possess in 
general no judicial interest. In doubtful cases the following are the 
chief points to be attended to : — 1. We must find out whether the 
child was bom alive or dead ; 2. If the mother be known, the rela- 
tive dimensions of her pelvis and of the child must be ascertained ; 

3. The body of the child must be carefully examined for finger- 
marks, scratches, and other injuries different from those referred to ; 

4. The condition of the cranial bones must be scutinized with special 
reference to defective ossification (§ 110), should actual fractures be 
present ; the state of the callus, if present, or of the effused blood, 
&c., must be examined; 5. All the circumstances of the fall, blow, 
or other act of violence must be carefully weighed ; 6. The condition of 
the pregnant woman in the interval between the infliction of the vio- 
lence and her delivery must be duly considered ; 7. The nature of the 
labour must be accurately ascertained, in the case of secret and rapid 
labours, with special reference to a possible sudden prolapse of the 
child (§ 114), in the case of labours brought to an artificial close with 
special reference to the employment of instruments, because even in 
the case of such births the question of intra-uterine injury may be 
brought forward in the case of an accusation against an obstetrician 
in regard to his professional assistance. 

The natural death of the foetus in utero is far more frequent than 
a violent one, particularly in the case of those births which almost 
exclusively occupy the attention of the medical jurist — the illegiti- 
mate. In Berlin, amongst those children born in wedlock, one in 
twenty-five is born dead, while among those children born out of 
wedlock, the proportion is one in twelve."^ The most common dis- 
eases discoverable in the bodies of those foetuses which die in utero 
are, anormal position and malformation of organs, dropsies, pemphi- 
gus, &c., a correct description of which it is not my province to 
give. 

§ 109. Death op the Child dubing Laboue. — (a) Subctjtanbotjs 
Effusion of Blood. — Cephalhematoma. 

Death of the child during its birth is most frequently, indeed 
daily, caused by cerebral hypersemia. It occurs in the body either 

* Vide Casper's Beitrage zur med. Statistik und Btaatsarzeneikunde. 
Berlin, 1825, 8. 172. 

I2 



116 § 109. DEATH DURING LABOUR.— CEPHALH-ffiMATOMA. 

as a visible congestion in the vascular membranes^ in the brain itself 
and its sinuses, or as actual hsemorrhage, either, what is rare, inside 
the cranium in the most various places, or, what is extremely fre- 
quent, as an extravasation of actual coagulated blood, which has 
escaped from the ruptured capillaries or veins into the cellular tissue 
between the pericranium and the occipital aponeurosis, which is the 
most common form, or beneath the pericranium which happens much 
more rarely. The position of this coagulum is in general the pos- 
terior third of the parietal bone as far as the half of the occipital bone; 
as it, however, depends upon the position of the head during labour, it 
also occurs much farther forward, even as far as the frontal bone 
itself, or entirely on one side of the parietal bone. The scalp 
appears externally not in the least discoloured, and in recent bodies often 
not even swollen; sometimes there is found, however, even after con- 
cealed, and therefore presumptively rapid, births, a slight but visible 
degree of the usual (oedematous) cranial swelling. When the occi- 
pital aponeurosis is separated from the bones, the coagulum is at 
once brought into view, either as it were encapsuled in the cellular 
tissue, or lying as a dark layer of about one line thick upon the 
pericranium, and sometimes both of these are present at once. In 
a few cases, which may almost be said to be of daily occurrence, this 
extravasation is found only in insular patches lying near one 
another ; in many others large continuous patches of the portions of 
the skull described, are found covered with it. It is of the utmost 
importance to remember the uncommon frequency of the spontaneous 
occurrence of this subaponeurotic extravasation, not to be led, 
from want of experience, into the unpardonable error of supposing 
that violence had been inflicted on the child. These effusions are 
not of themselves the cause of death, as is proved by their being 
very frequently found in children who have been known to die from 
other causes : indeed their origin in the act of birth, even where that 
is rapid (concealed), is so easily explicable, and their occurrence, as 
already said, is such a daily affair, that it appears reasonable to con- 
clude tha£ similar ruptures of vessels external to the cranial cavity 
occur in newborn children generally, even under the favourable cir- 
cumstances of private practice, much more frequently than is supposed, 
and that they only do not become objects of observation, because 
when the child lives they are gradually absorbed (§ 102). When 
they are found in the body, not they, but the concomitant actual 
cerebral hypersemia is to be looked upon as the cause of death. 



§ 110. CRANIAL INJURIES. 117 

That such a hyper»mia maj prove fatal to the child immediately 
before as well as during labour, or in the act of birth, is frequently 
observed in the case of children indubitably bom dead, whose 
bodies display these congestions to a greater or less, and often to a 
very great extent. After what I have already said (§ 102, p. 87, 
Vol. III.) I do not require again to state that this appearance 
does not in the very slightest prove that the child has lived after 
its birth.* 

Allied to this appearance is the well-known cephalhsematoma or 
bloody swelling of the head. But this peculiar extravasation of blood 
is by no means of so much importance in a medico-legal point of view 
as mere theoretic authors so often make out. It almost never occurs 
in medico-legal practice, and in truth for this simple reason that it 
has only to do with new-bom children, while cephalhsematoma does 
not commence to appear till several days after birth. Even in such 
cases however as may possibly occur — ^not one of which has ever 
come before me on the dissecting-table — ^it is quite superfluous to 
warn, as is so often done, any but a mere beginner of the danger of 
confounding this bloody swelling with an ecchymosis caused by 
external violence, since the pecuUarly sharply-defined character of 
the cephalhsematoma, and the well-known feeling of a roundish 
opening in the bone and distinguishes in the plainest manner this 
phenomena from an ecchymosis, which is never sharply defined, but 
always diffuse and irregular in its form and boundaries. 

§ 110. Continuation. — (6.) Cranial Injuries. — Defective 
Ossification of the Skull-bones. 

That the bones of the skull may be bent or broken, in and during 
the act of birth, is indubitable, and has long since been set down as 
established both in the practice and literature of obstetrics. That 
medico-legal practice, therefore, has only rarely to deal with fissures 
and fractures of the skull of newborn children, which, from their 
accompanying circumstances can be ascribed to the act of birth, this 
is readily explicable from the fact that these accidents are chiefly 
caused by severe labour, whether that be produced by the peculiarity 
of the child or of the maternal pelvis ; whilst from the very nature of 
the matter only the results of concealed, and consequently more or 
less very rapidly ended, births, come to the cognizance of the law.f 

♦ Vide § 115 ia regard to this appearance in a diagnostic point of view. 

f On cranial injuries after birth — Vide §§ 114, 115. 



118 § 110. CRANIAL INJURIES. 

For the same reason fractures of the extremities, fractures of the 
spine, rupture of the skull with protruaon of the brain, and the other 
like resxdts of extoemely tedious and difficult Ij^urs, do not occur 
in medico-l^al practke ; and if perhaps from some quite peculiar 
circumstances, an exceptional case of more or less important injuries 
to the child, from a tedious yet concealed delivery, should come 
before the medical jurist for his opinion, there would be no difficulty 
in arriving at a just conclusion, by giving due consideration to this 
tedious labour, whose occurrence and course the (discovered) mother 
would have no interest in concealing. To this it may be added that 
in such a case the child is usually bom dead, and the case therefore 
eould scarcely possess any judicial interest whatever. More frequently 
there is observed, even in concealed births, a mere depression or 
nmrk upon the thin cranial bones, particularly the parietal bones, 
which may be produced even in relatively easy births, by the pressure 
of a greatly protuberant sacral promontory. Such a depression of 
itself is not to be regarded as a cause of death, since it is often 
enough seen in practice, even in children which continue to live 
(§ 108). Mssures, which from the great tenuity of the foetal cra- 
nial bones, are ilso/ractnres, are a much more important result of the 
act of parturition. Accurate observations^ have shown that these may 
possibly occur ev^n where the labour has not be^i particularly 
tedious or difficult, and has been concluded without any artificial 
assistance ; tkey may, tkerefore, occv/r in primapwral <md in concealed 
births. These fissures and fractures have been erroneously termed 
^^congenital,^^ as if they had existed in the foetus previous to the 
commencement of labour, while they are the result of that act. 
They prove fatal to the child either at once, or after it has respired 
a few times, as the docimasia pulmonaris subsequentiy proves, or 
life may continue for a few days and cease under symptoms of con- 
tinually increasing pressure on the brain. They occur almost ex- 
clusively in the parietal bones, commonly only in one, sometimes and 
usually transversely to the saggital suture; at others, bat more 
rarely stretching from the frontal bone, more or less parallel 
to the sagittal suture. Most generally only one such fissure 
exists, at others there are several. On a close inspection 
the finely serrated edges of the fissure are usually found to 

» By Meissner, Garus, E. v. Siebold, Chaussier, OUivier, d'Outrepont, 
Hore, Mende, and Siegel. Vide C. F. Hedinger, iiber die Knoohenverletz- 
ungen bei Neugeborneu in med.-ger. Hinsioht. Leipzig, 1833. 



§ 110. CRANIAL INJURIES. 119 

display a faint ecchymosis. The diagnosis of such fissures and 
fractures from similar ones which have been produced after birth by 
any kind of extra-uterine violence^ may be difficulty and must always 
be determined by the actual circumstances of each individual case. 
Traces of violence externally visible on the body,sHich as ecchymosisand 
wounds of the scalp, which are not found in the so-called ^^ congeni- 
tal^' fissures and fractures I have been speaking of; other injuries, 
found either on the body of the child or internally, such as impor- 
tant anormalities of the cerebral membranes, of the brain itself, of 
the other cranial bones, or of the base of the cranium, all point to 
the pod natum origin of the fissure. There is, however, one cir- 
cumstance of not very rare occurrence, which permits us to conclude 
with the highest probability, if not with absolute certainty, that the 
injury has occurred in the birth, with all that follows from such a 
conclusion in regard to the criminal bearings of the case. I mean the 
discovery of defeeime ossification in the dcull of a newborn child. It 
is somewhat semarkable that this very important appearance, which 
might so readily lead to dangerous mistakes, has received scarcely 
any notice from modem authors, while the more experienced among 
the earlier writers must have paid some attention to it, since they 
observed it on the body.***" An arrest of the process of ossification 
occurs not only in the case of immature children, but even in those 
which present the phenomena of maturity in all their completeness, 
not only in those which are generally ill-nourished, but even in 
those children which are of the average weight of mature and well- 
nourished foetuses. I have already (§ 80, p. 23, Vol. III., and 
§ 97, p. 79, Vol. III.) shown this to be the case in regard to the 
osseous nucleus of the femoral epiphysis. The bones of the skull 
have also their ossification frequently retarded, and this defect is 
oftenest observed in both the parietal bones ; also in the frontal bone, 
and most rarely in the occipital bone. If the bone in question is 
held up to the light, this is seen to shine through the opening, which 
is closed only by the pericranium. When the periosteal membrane is 
removed, the deficiency in the ossification is seen in form of a round, 

• Biittner, in his work — somewhat obsolete, indeed, but yet instructive, 
from the large experience which he had occasion to accumulate as ** Sam- 
landisoher Kreisphysicus," entitled " Vollstandige Anweisung wie u. s. w. 
ein venibter Kindermord auszumittela sei," Konigsberg, 1771, s. 82, de- 
scribes tbis defective ossification uncommonly true to nature. Mende also 
describes it, and apparently from personal observation. 



120 § 111. DEFECTIVE OSSIFICATION OF THE SKULL. 

or irregularly circular opening, not often more than three lines in 
diameter, though jfrequently less ; its edges are irregular and serrated ; 
these edges are never depressed as is the case m fractures; and 
neither they, nor the parts in their neighbourhood, are ever observed 
to be ecchymosed. In order finally to render it impossible to mis- 
take snch a cranial deficiency for a fracture, we have only to examine 
the neighbourhood of the opening by holding the bone against the 
light, and we shall always find that within a greater or less circum- 
ference, there are other defective pieces in the bone ; that is, that there 
are patches of the osseous tissue which are as thin as paper, and are 
translucent. I can certify, that a careful consideration of these 
diagnostic marks has prevented my ever committing a mistake in the 
diagnosis of doubtful cases. Plate VII., Fig. 20 and 20df, gives a 
very natural representation of such defective ossification, and in 
further elucidation of this appearance, a due consideration of which 
is of the utmost practical importance, I append the following selected 
observations. 

§ 111. Illustbative Cases. 
Case CCCLXIX. — Defective Ossification with Pissure of 

THE BIGHT PaRIETAL BoNB. 

A newborn male child found dead on the street. The body 
was (in January) quite fresh. Its length twenty inches, weight seven 
pounds and a-half ; cranial diameters, which were respectively three 
inches and a-half, four inches and a-qnarter, and five inches, &c., all 
proved that the child was perfectly mature, and its life subsequent 
to birth was also proved by results of the docimasia pulmonaris. The 
face, neck, breast, back, and inferior extremities exhibited distinct 
traces of pemphigus. On the tuberosity of the right parietal bone 
there was an irregular roundish opening in the bone one line and a-half 
in diameter, and at one line's distance from it there were two similar 
openings each two lines in diameter, and united with each other by 
means of a fissure. The edges of these openings were much serrated, 
were not ecchymosed, and the bone for half-an-inch round these open- 
ings was as thin as paper and translucent. The maturity and life of the 
child subsequent to its birth were declared in the opinion given by 
us; and we further stated that the injuries to the bones were not the 
result of external violence, and had no connection with the cause of 
the child's death. 



§111. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 121 



Case (XJCLXX. — ^Defbctivb Ossification m the left Pabietal 

Bone, 

According to the statement of the midwife, who was called in im- 
mediately after the delivery of the mother, a maid-servant, who had 
secretly given birth to this child, it was then just in the act of 
drawing its last breath. The chfld, a boy, was perfectly mature 
(seven pounds, twenty inches, cranial diameters three and a-quarter, 
four and a-quarter, and five inches, &c.). The lungs were of a cin- 
nabar-red, mottled with blue, frothed and crepitated on being incised, 
and floated perfectly. In the middle of the left parietal bone there 
were two roundish openings cloge to one another, each three lines in 
diameter and with serrated edges; the bone surrounding these 
openings was not in this case remarkably translucent. It was par- 
ticularly interesting to find that a narrow spicula of bone ran right 
across one of these openings, thus at once completely removing every 
possible doubt as to the nature of its origin in defective ossification. 
The child had died from hypersemia. After we had explained the 
nature of the apparent injury to the bone, the case was not further 
followed judicially, as the law takes no notice of the mere conceal- 
ment of an illegitimate pregnancy or birth. 

Case CCCLXXI.— Defective Ossification of both Pabietal 
Bones.—- Severing the IlMBiLiCAii Cobd close to the Um- 
bilicus. — ^No ILffiMOBJlHAGE. 

This secretly born female child was said to have been bom dead, 
the results of the docimasia pulmonaris, however, proved indubitably 
that it had lived, and had died from apoplexy. The length of the 
child, nineteen inches, and its weight, six pounds and three-quarters, 
all indicated its maturity, while the somewhat short cranial diameters, 
three inches, four inches, and four inches and three-quarters, and 
also the chrcumstance that along with the body the placenta (with the 
whole of the cord, which had been severed close to the umbihcus) was 
brought before us, all pointed to the probability of the birth having 
been precipitate. There were two defects in the ossification of the 
left parietal bone, one triangular in shape, the other the size of a 
fourpenny-piece. The edges of both were strongly serrated, so that 
comparatively long spiculse stretched into the opening. There was 



122 I IIK ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

also a similar defective patch, the size of a fourpenny-piece,* on the 
right parietal bone* On that part of the occipital aponeurosis cor- 
responding with the vertex there was on its internal surface a 
circular extravasation of coagulated blood about a line thick, with- 
out the dightest trace of any violence having been applied exter- 
nally* Two small fissures diverged from the circular opening in the 
left parietal bone* The body was of the usual ccw^se colour, and not 
that the result of haemorrhage ; the lungs were not pale, but of a 
reddish-blue and mottled ; the Uvct was very hyperaemic, and the 
apoplectic cerebral congestion present was very decided. The child 
had, therefore, certainly not died from haemorrhage from the divided 
umbilical cord ; whether that had been severed merely after the 
complete cessation of tiie pulsation,*or after tiie actual death of the 
child could not of course be ascertained. The whole (rf the appear- 
ances were in favour of the probability that the child had died from 
apoplexy produced by a fall on the head by precipitate birth, and 
this probability was made the basis of the opinion we deUvered. 

Case OOCLXXII. — ^Defective Ossipicatioh in both Pabietal 
Bones. — Doubtful Death fsom Drowning. 

The body of this firm, mature, newborn boy was found in the 
water close to the bank, at an atmospheric temperature (in September) 
of + 5° — 8° E. = 43°-25 — 50° P. It was, even to the umbilical cord, 
still perfectly fresh, and we were therefore able to answer the ques- 
tion put to us as follows : — that it had not been more than three or 
four days since the child had been born, and had died. The life of this 
child subsequent to its birth could not be doubted. The position of the 
diaphragm below the sixth rib ; the perfect, even somewhat extra- 
vagant, distention, of the lungs, which, as in those drowned, pressed 
close to the ribs; their very bright-red, and dark-mottled colour; the 
amount of blood and air contained in them, and their perfect 
buoyancy, all spoke in favour of this. The trachea was pale and 
empty and so was the stomach. The heart contained almost no 
Wood. The abdomen displayed nothing remarkable, but there was 
apoplectic hypersemia within the cranial cavity. Upon the vertex 
and the right side of the frontal bone there were small extravasations 
beneath the occipital aponeurosis, and both the parietal bones dis- 
played precisely those defects in ossification exhibited in the 
representation, Plate VII., Fig. 20. Besides the statement already 



5 111. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 123 

made as to the probable time of the birth and death of the child, ire 
also stated, in answer to questions put to us, that the child had been 
mature and had lived ; that it had died of apoplexy ; that it was not 
improbaUe, that the child had died in the water (been drowned), but 
that it could certainly have lain but a short time in the water ; and 
this was indubitable, since neither the hands nor the feet displayed 
the slightest trace of maceration. 

Case CCCLXXin. — ^Dbpectivb Ossipication in both Pakietal 
Bones. — ^Doubtful Death from Drowning. 

This case very much resembled the one just related. The new* 
bom boy was taken out of the water already (in July) much putrefied ; 
its head was black, the rest of the body greyish-green, llie degree 
of internal putrescence corresponded with the external appearance : 
for instance, the liver floated, &c. Nevertheless we did not set aside 
the case as unfitted for further examination, for this was by no means 
the case. The diaphragm stood between the sixth and seventh ribs, 
the stomach was empty; the lungs almost completely filled the 
thorax, the right one was strewn with a considerable number of 
putrefactive bullee the size of millet-seeds"; the colour of both lungs 
was a livid dirty-reddish with bluish patches ; both ca^epitated when 
incised, and in spite of the putrescence gave vent to a bloody froth. 
They were perfectly buoyant, all but a piece of the left lung the size 
of a bean. The occipital aponeurosis was uniigured, as was also the 
rest of the body. In both parietal bones there were patches of defec- 
tive ossification of unusual size, for in each there was an opening half- 
an-inch long and a quarter-of-an-ineh wide, with serrated edges and 
the surrounding bone no tlncker than a sheet of paper. From these 
openings sarated-edged ecchymosed fractures one inch and one inch 
anda-half long stretched away towards the vertex and the occipital bone. 
Of the other appearances I need only now mention the cleanly-cut um- 
bilical cord, which was not less than twenty-seven inches long. On 
account of the position of the diaphragm and the condition (^ the 
lungs, it must be assumed that the child had Uved, and because of 
the absence of any corresponding appearances, that it had not been 
drowned. The cranial injuries might have arisen from violence 
inflicted on the body while in the water, or in taking it out ; on the 
other hand, the uninjured state of the cranial coverings and of the 
rest of the body was against this view; or they might have been 



124 § 111. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

caused by violent blows on the head, but these would also have left 
behind more important and more visible external evidence ; or they 
might have been produced by the accidental fall of the child during 
delivery, a consequence which must have been favoured by the 
length of the umbilical cord, and by the extraordinary deficiency in 
the ossification of the skull, and which explained the fractures of the 
skull in the simplest manner consistent with experience. We gave 
our opinion in accordance with these facts.*^ 

Case CXX/LXXIV. — ^Depbctivb Ossification of both Parietal 
Bones with Fissuees. — Eespibation in a closed box. 

The following case was interesting in many points. An an- 
married maid-servant had some years previously already given 
birth to a child, and had concealed this pregnancy up to its 
close; she was secretly deUvered about seven o'clock one April 
morning, and beheved the child to be dead, for which she gave the 
usual reasons. Certain it is, that she placed the child in a chest of 
drawers and closed the drawer. Two hours subsequently her fellow- 
servant and a sewing girl who was occupied in the room, to their 
great surprise heard the cry of a child proceeding from this chest of 
drawers, and at once discovered it lying in it, fresh and healthy. It 
was taken to a relative to be brought up, but it died there '^quietly'^ 
at seven o'clock in the evening, after having lived precisely twelve 
hours. The examination in the first place showed the perfect matu- 
rity of the child, which was a very strong one, measuring twenty-one 
inches, weighing eight pounds and a-quarter, and with cranial 
diameters of corresponding development. There was nothing remark- 
able found in the abdomen, except perhaps that in the stomach there 
were two teaspoonfuls of a thickish glutinous, brownish, somewhat 
bloody and fermenting fluid, which appeared to have been given to 
the child as food. The urinary bladder was quite empty and the 
large intestines had only a small quantity of meconium in them. 
On opening the thorax the cause of death was seen to have been a 
very well-marked pulmonary apoplexy. The lungs were blood red, 
mottled with rosy red, they crepitated and gave vent on incision to 
an extraordinary large quantity of a dark blood-red froth. More- 
over, they were of the very considerable weight of three ounces, 
fourteen drachms (imp.) ; they were perfectly buoyant. The larynx 

• Vide Cases CCCLXXV.-CCCLXXXIV. 



§ 112. CONSTRICTION BY THE CORD. 125 

and trachea were perfectly empty and normal, and the heart empty. 
The appearances in the cranial cavity were extremely interesting. 
Upon the occiput there was a small cranial swelling of the nsual 
character; on the left parietal bone there were three blood coagula, 
each one inch long, two lines broad and about half-aJine thick. 
After removing the bone, the dura mater was found about the centre 
of the bone to be loosened and elevated as a bag in which there lay 
about half-a-teaspooonful of dark and very fluid blood. After removal 
of this membrane and the pericranium, we found on this position of 
the bone, three openings, about the size of peas, with the usual 
finely serrated and perfectly unecchymosed edges; and the sur- 
rounding bone was translucent, as usual in all such cases, when 
held up to the light, in this instance for the space of one quarter 
of an inch. From the inferior opening a perfectly straight, fine and 
scarcely serrated unecchymosed fissure stretched away towards the 
sagittal suture, and a second one ran almost parallel with it from the 
superior opening into the third one {Fide, the representation of the 
preparation, Plate VII., Fig. 20a). A precisely similar appearance 
was found in the vaulting of the right parietal bone, only that here 
there were only two openings found in the bone. It is remarkable 
that the cranial cavity and the brain showed no trace of hypersemia, 
and also that in spite of the defective ossification of these two 
cranial bones, the osseous nucleus of the femoral epiphysis still mea- 
sured three lines and a-half in diameter. The opinion given in this 
unusual case was : that the child was mature, had lived, and had died 
of pulmonary apoplexy, but that there was no reason to suppose that 
this had been caused by violence, and in particular that the cranial 
injuries could not be regarded as such a cause, any more than the 
shutting up of the child during two hours in a chest of drawers."^ 

§ 112. Continuation. — (c) Compeession and Coiling op the 
Umbilical Coed bound the Child's neck. — The maek op 
Stbangulation. 

The compression of the umbilical cord when prolapsed is just as likely 
to occasion the death of the child during deUvery, as its being 
coiled round the neck is unlikely to do so, as every obstetrician 
knows. Hohlt has observed in two hundred births the umbilical 

• Vide Case CCCLXXXIX. f Qp. cit, s. 456. 



126 I 112. CONSTRICTION BY THE CORD. 

cord coiled round the neck one hundred and eighty •one times; 
the result of these births was one hundred and sixty-three living 
children and eighteen dead ones^ and amongst these eighteen there 
were seven cases in which the coiling of the cord could be proved to 
have no hand in producing deaths and in the remaining eleven it 
could not be proved to be the sole cause of death. Mayer^ indeed, 
reports from Nsegele's clinique, six hundred and eighty-five cases of 
children bom with the umbilical cord coiled round their neck, of 
which only eighteen could be proved to have been killed therd)y.* 
On the other hand, in seven hundred and forty-three cases of prolapse 
of the cord, collected by Scanzoni, four hundred and eight of the 
children were born dead,t or nearly fifty-five per cent. The physio- 
logical cause of death in such cases has been ahready related under 
the head of Death from Suffocation, § 40 p. 124, Yol. II. In the 
circumstance that death in such cases is caused by preventing the 
blood altered in the placenta from reaching the foetus, so that it is 
forced to make instinctive respiratory movements and is suffocated ; 
we have also an explanation why the premature aeparation of the 
placenta and the death of the mother in the act of delivery produce 
a similar result, — death of the child by suffocation. According to the 
admirable recent works upon this subject, particularly Hecker's, which 
adduces many accurate observations, besides carefully collecting all 
that had been previously written on the subject {op. cit.), this 
concatenation of events in the death of the child under the circum- 
stances mentioned can be no longer doubted. All the earlier opinions, 
such as that the cooling of the cord by its prolapse produced death, 
must be regarded as for ever set aside. For forensic medicine this 
result is of considerable value, inasmuch as it is now determined 
that by spontaneous procedure during delivery alone, the death of 
the child, still in the birth, may be caused by suffocation which may be 
rendered visible in the body by the most exquisite appearances, 
particularly by the capillary ecchymoses already referred to (p. 126 
Vol. n.), and the medical jurist is not, therefore, justified by these 
appearances alone in accusing any one of a crime. Good obser- 
vations have ako proved that the coiling of the cord round the neck 
when it does kill, may prove fatal in this way by interrupting the 
placental circulation, that consequently in these cases the appear- 
ances due to death from suffocation may be found in the body, and 

♦ Vide Heoker's treatise (quoted at p. 127, vol. II.) s. 30. 
t Lehrbuoh der Geburtshiilfe, 3 Aufl. Wien, 1855, s. 682. 



S 112. CONSTRICTION BY THE CORD. 127 

indeed that this kind of death is that most frequently observed in 
such cases. But the appearances due to death from suffocation are 
not those solely and exclusively to be founds and I cannot agree that^ 
as is supposed^ death by coiling of the umbilical cord round the neck 
can never occur from cerebral hyperwmia, and never does so occur; 
two observations, in which indeed actual cerebral haemorrhage was the 
result of the constriction of the neck by the cord, have been seen by us 
(Cases CCCXXVII. and CCCXCIX.), prove the opposite, and as 
positive evidence have a decisive value greater than many negatives. 
Scanzoni has also in twelve cases of fatal prolapse of tl^ umbilical 
cord found cerebral hyper«emia four times."^ In accordance with 
the results of his ingenious experiments he assumes that in both 
cases, prolapse and coiling of the umbilical cord, the kind of death is 
determined by the different amount of compression sustaine4 by the 
cord, which is sometines greater, at others less, at one time affecting 
all the vessels of the cord, at others only a certain number of them, 
and upon this it depends whether the communicaticm between the 
foetal and maternal blood and the resulting respiratory function of 
the placenta is completely put a stop to, or whether by one or both 
of the arteries remaining pervious anaemia is produced, or by their 
closure, and the persistent patency of the veins, hyperajmia and apo- 
plexy of individual organs are brought about. This view explains the 
diversity in the appearances found in such cases in a most satisfac- 
tory way. 

It is of the greatest importance to be able to distinguish 
intentional strangulation from that produced by the umbilical cord. 
The mark produced by the coiling of the umbilical cord round the neck 
runs, however, witiiout interruption right round the neck, — a state of 
matters found also indeed in cases of strangulation, — ^but rarely in 
cases of hanging, and only then when the cord was made into a run- 
ning noose. The mark of the umbilical cord, moreover, is broad, corre- 
sponding with the breadth of the cord, circularly depressed, grooved, 
everywhere quite soft ; never excoriated, as so often happens where 
rope or other hard and rough implement of strangulation has been em- 
ployed. Opinions are very much divided in regard to the question of 
ecchymosis in the subcutaneous cellular tissue beneath the mark 
produced by the umbilical cord. Kleint and ElsasserJ never have 

♦ Op. cit. 8. 682. t Hufeland's Journal, 1815. 

I Schmidt's Jahrbiicher, vii. s. 204. 



128 § 113. CONSTRICTION BY THE UTERUS. 

observed this, and decidedly deny its occnrreiice, while LofBer,* 
Carus,t Schwarz4 Albert,§ Marc,|| Hohl,l &c., have observed 
ecchymoses. They certainly do not occur in every case, and are pro- 
bably never found when the death of the child ensues so suddenly 
that they have not time to fonn. That, however, true ecchymosis, 
actual extravasation of blood, proved not merely by its livid colour, 
but also by incision, may be formed, I have frequently observed {Fide, 
amongst others. Case CCCXXVII.), whilst trae ecchymosis never 
occurs in the case of death from intentional strangulation. It is 
very rare, however, even in the case of a mark produced by an umbi- 
lical cord, that the groove is ecchymosed throughout its whole extent, 
in general it is so only in isolated spots. Further, as the noose is seldom 
a single one, but commonly two- or three-fold, so the mark left by it is 
manifold. A mummified, parch ment-hke, nnecchymosed depression 
points in every case to strangulation by a hard and rough body. The 
consideration of all these circumstances will determine the diagnosis 
in each particular case. — I take this opportunity of referring to an 
error I have frequently seen committed by inexperienced persons, 
such as students or candidates for examination, &c., who are 
apt to mistake an appearance on the body of a newborn child 
for the mark of a cord with which it has nothing to do. If, 
for instance, we examine a number of fat and fresh bodies of 
children, especially in winter, we shall readily perceive it to be 
a possible error to mistake tAe folds of the shiny produced hy the 
movements of the head, and which remain strongly marked in the 
solidified fat, and are very prominent, particularly in short necks, 
for the mark of a cord, unless we correct our erroneous impression 
by a proper consideration of the various criteria belonging to a true 
mark of strangulation, which will speedily teach us the truth. 

§ 113. Continuation. — {d) Constriction by the Uterus. 

A spasmodic contraction of the uterus round the neck of the child 
may produce the same effect as constriction by the umbilical cord, 

♦ Hufeland's Journal, Bd. xxi. s. 69, 
t Leipziger, Liter. Zeitung^ 1821, s. 583. 
X Henke's Zeitsohr., Bd. vii. s. 129, &o. 
$ lUd, Bd. xxi. 8. 183 ; and Bd. xlii. b. 207. 

II Along with four of his colleagues, in a case reported upon hy them in 
common, vide Devergie, op, cit. s. 622. ^ Qp. dt. s. 457. 



§ 114. PRECIPITATE BIRTH. 129 

and may also prove fatal to the child during its birth. Though 
Mende and others have denied the possibility of this occurrence, yet 
trustworthy observations have placed it beyond a doubt. Hohl,"^ in 
a case of partial spasm of the uterus at the entrance of the right 
tuba, found upon the child a mark caused by the stricture, which 
commenced above the genital organs, and ran obliquely downwards 
over the anterior and external surface of the right thigh. In 
another case of breech presentation the os uteri, after the passage of 
the body, contracted spasmodically round the neck of the child, and 
that so firmly that Hohl could only with difficulty effect its extrac- 
tion. Round about the neck of the dead child, and particularly on 
its anterior half, there was a groove almost the depth of the thick- 
ness of a finger, which was in patches of a bluish colour. Unfor- 
tunately, no dissection of the body is reported. Lofflert also felt 
during a delivery a firm constriction of the uterus, and subsequently 
found a livid stripe of the breadth of three fingers running round 
the body of the dead-bom child. This peculiar and certainly ex- 
tremely rare cause of death to the child during delivery possesses, 
however, scarcely any medico-legal interest, since its occurrence 
presupposes a tedious and difficult labour, which cannot be concluded 
without the presence of witnesses and experts, who can give to the 
Judge a sufficient explanation of what took place during delivery. 

§ 114. Death op the Child Subsequent to Birth. — (a) By the 
Pall of its head on the Plooe. 

Por the last two centuries and a-half (Zittman) all obstetrical 
and medico-legal authors have assumed the possibility of a child, in 
a natural but precipitate delivery, falling so violently head-foremost 
from the birth as to injure itself, and that even fatally. The 
danger of such an opinion in a criminal point of view, the possibility 
that a child-murder actually committed might be obscured by the 
declaration of such an accident on the part of the accused, has 
never been denied. Eight-and-forty years ago, however, Klein J 
came forward with the statement that precipitate delivery is by no 
means attended with the dangerous results so universally ascribed to 

* Op, cit., 8. 633. t Hufeland's Journal, xzi. s. 69, quoted by Hohl. 

% Hufeland's Journal, 1815, November, s. 105. Bemerkungen fiber die 
bisher angenommenen Folgen des Sturzes der Kinder auf den Boden bei 
schnellen Geburten. Stuttgart, 1817. 

VOL. III. K 



130 § 114. PRECIPITATE BIRTH. 

it. He based this statement upon a series of reports collected 
throughout the whole country (of Wlirtemberg) from obstetricians, 
midwives, clergymen, &c., in which he considered that on the whole 
he had obtained only negative results. Klein's treatise, however, 
only proves how hazardous it is to decide as to the value of facts 
whUe prejudiced by a preconceived opinion, and how insufficient it is 
to view the facts themselves, not with our own eyes but with those of 
others. He has not hesitated to accept the statements not only of 
midwives, but even of clergymen and monthly nurses, though no un- 
prejudiced person could suppose these people to possess the amount 
of knowledge requisite to constitute them judges in such a difficult 
scientific question; he has not hesitated to accept from obstetricians 
the reports of cases which had happened years, aye, tens of years 
previously, and which the reporters have related purely from 
memory, and he has not hesitated to base his criticism upon such a 
foundation. It is the less necessary to prove more in detail the 
untenableness of his criticism, because this has been already suffi- 
ciently done by Henke* and others. Moreover, Klein himself comes 
finally to the conclusion : that a fall on the floor in a precipitate 
birth may produce injurious and fatal consequences, but does not 
necessarily do so, — a conclusion which has never been disputed either 
previous to or since his publication. Klein has had no imitators, till 
quite recently Hohlt has come forward, and with most determined 
scepticism has sought to overthrow the whole doctrine of fatal 
injury to the child in cases of precipitate. birth, and particularly of 
delivery in the erect posture. My own numerous experiments upon 
dead bodies lead me entirely to agree with him in his critique upon 
the experiments of Lecieux, the superficiality of which {vide notej) 

* Abhundl aus d. Geb. der ger. Med. 2 Aufi. Bd. iii., Leipzig, 1824, s. 3, &c. 

t Op. cit, 8. 573 and 819. 

X Lecieux, Renard, Laisn6 et Rieux, Mededne hgale ou considerations sur 
Pinfantiddej &o. Paris, 1819, p. 64. The experiments mentioned were as 
follow I — (1.) "Sometime after their birth, fifteen dead children were allowed 
to fall from a height of eighteen inehes npon a stone floor (sol carreU, the 
customary flooring of French houses) ; twelve of these had one, or some- 
times boUi of their parietal bones fractured, either longitudinally or trans- 
versely. (2.) Fifteen children were allowed to fall thirty-six inches, and in 
twelve of these the parietal bone was found to be fractured, and in a few 
this fracture extended into the frontal bone. If the children were allowed 
to fall from a still greater height, the membranous connection of the cranial 
bones was found to be relaxed, even lacerated in some parts ; often the ap- 
pearance of the brain was altered, and in a few cases beneath the cerebral 



§ 114. PRECIPITATE BIRTH. 131 

makes them entirely worthless. ^^In these experiments/^ says 
Hohl, " the restraining influence exercised hy the passage of the 
body through the genitals, by the umbilical cord, and also by the 
placenta, is wholly wanting. Moreover, in regard to the projecting 
force it must be remembered that a child born head-foremost, has 
already passed out of the uterus, and the extruding power of the 
latter does not come into consideration at all. The adjuvant bearing 
down alone of the parturient woman herself is what specially pro- 
duces the extrusion of the body, but in general this ceases imme- 
diately on the birth of the head, and the parturient female must be 
induced to exert herself in this manner, if for any reason it is 
desired to hasten the birth of the body of the child. The power of 
these exertions is, however, to be rated at very little in the case of 
delivery in the erect posture. Yet when the child does come to the 
ground at birth, the parturient woman must either be standing, sit- 
ting, or squatting. The distance from the ground in such a kneeling or 
cowering posture appears to me, however, to be too small to permit 
of the production of fracture of the bones by such a fall, and no 
parturient female ever remains perfectly upright at the final moment 
of the birth of the child/^ In another place (p. 574) Hohl, found- 
ing upon his experience in the Lying-in Institution, states that 
there is no reason for supposing that a woman bringing forth in 
secret should expose herself to the pangs of labour in the upright 
position, since even at the last moment she has still time enough to 
lie down, or to squat — that, therefore, the statement of the accused, 
that she had given birth to the child in the erect posture must be 
regarded "as a pure fabrication,^' — an important dogma for the 
public prosecutor, and one which, if it had any foundation, would 
at once completely upset the whole doctrine in regard to injury to 
the child by falling on the floor at its birth ! But this statement is 
evidently the result of scientific obstetric theory, and not of medico- 
legal experience. How different is the position of a parturient 
female in a public lying-in institution, or in private practice, from 
that of a lonely and helpless woman, who, after carefully and 
anxiously concealing her pregnancy up to the last moment, is sud- 
denly surprised by her labour while at work, or at night iu her room, 
membrane (? meninge\ or in its substance (? epaisseur de la meninge)^ there 
was found an eochymosis arising from the rupture of some vessel, and no 
fractures were found, only in the case of children with soft and very flexible 
cranial bones." This is a literal translation of the original passage re- 
ferred to. 

K 2 



132 § 114. PRECIPITATE BIRTH. 

in a cellar, &c., and who, stoutly suppressing the earlier pangs, 
because she is still under observation, so soon as circumstances 
pennit her, repairs to some lonely spot in a state of emotional and 
nervous excitement, which can only be thought of with compassion, 
because now the utter hopelessness of her future lies clear before 
her, knowing that she will be at once expelled from the house, and 
that she has nothing to expect from her seducer, &c., and in whom 
a general spasmodic state of excitement is accompanied by a veritable 
tetanic action of the uterus, which Wiegand has appropriately de- 
scribed as '^an over-expulsive action of the uterus/' I am no 
friend to that excess of philanthropy, in medico-legal affairs, which 
is the source of so many abuses by medical men, but under circum- 
stances such as those described, which are of daily occurrence in 
actual hfe, common humanity would compel us to assume the possi- 
bility of the last moment of labour surprising the woman in every 
possible position, provided only experience had taught us that such 
cases did occur even in but a few rare instances. But these cases 
do actually occur, and that by no means in such scanty numbers, so 
that even cases of sudden dehvery in the erect posture can by 
no means be wholly set aside as instances of ^^ pure fabrication/' 
In Case COCLXXVIII., to be related presently, a maid-servant 
who had concealed her pregnancy, was walking upon the hard frozen 
road, laden with a heavy basket, when she wiEis suddenly surprised 
by her labour, and the child shot from her before the eyes of her 
mistress, by whose side she was walking. In Case CCCLXXVIL 
the delivery also took place in the erect posture before the eyes of a 
witness. In another case, which was referred to me for decision by 
a foreign jury court, it was proved that the child was bom while 
the accused was, as it were, suspended in the air. The usual position 
of her bed was somewhat elevated, so that she could not get into it 
without first stepping on a stool. After concealing her labour-pains 
for some time, and when she was about to lay herself down in bed 
to await delivery, as she stood with one foot upon the stool and the 
other upon the edge of the bed, the child shot from her and was 
fatally injured. All the circumstances of the case, the inquiries into 
the state of the locality, the examination of the child and of the mother, 
which had been most carefully carried out by the medical jurists, 
and finally, the subjective conditions of the case, which, however, 
did not afifect our views, all were in favour of the truth of the state- 
ment made by the accused, who was consequently, and specially on 



§ 115. RESULTS OF PRECIPITATE BIRTH. 133 

account of the opinion given by me, declared to be not guilty. This 
case also shows that purely theoretic reasonings as to the influence 
of the fall, taken from the measurement or estimation of its height, 
supposing the woman to be standing or kneeling, &c., upon the floor, 
are not sufficient for all possibihties. And the same was proved by 
another case, in which the child was bom upon the seat of a privy, 
and shot from above into the cesspool, which contained hard frozen 
fseces.''^ Some years ago there came before me, as physician to a 
prison, the case of a prisoner who was prematurely delivered in her 
cell, before the eyes of her fellow-prisoner. The child was shot 
from her while she stood undressing, before the house-surgeon 
living in the house could be summoned. And I never shall forget 
a case, which occurred in my private practice at an earlier period ; a 
married lady had come to Berlin, in order to be confined at her 
mother's, for the third time. She was suddenly seized with her 
labour while standing by the stove in the presence of her mother, 
and the child fell upon the carpet, without any injury to itself, how- 
ever. After such experience, I am perfectly justified in accepting 
the general opinion, that a pabtubient female may be subpbised 
by the last act of bibth in eveby position, even when 
ebect, that the child may be thus fobcibly expelled fbom 

HEB genitals, AND MAY BE THEBEBY INJUBED, PABTICULABLY 

ON ITS HEAD, AND THAT EVEN FATALLY. As I have already 
stated, it has never been imagined that a child thus born is 
of necessity killed. Such a supposition is of course quite un- 
tenable. In the present state of the Prussian penal code, which 
fortunately no longer takes cognizance of degrees of lethality, it is 
quite superfluous to enter more at large upon this subject. 

§115. Continuation. — Results of Pbecipitatb Bibth and 
THEiB Diagnosis. 

The possible results of a child's falling to the ground at its birth 
are : Rupture of the umbilical cord, which, however, by no means 
always happens ; premature separation of the placenta with its 
results ; concussion of the brain, and particularly hypersemia of and 
within the skull, or actual cerebral haemorrhage ; the first of these 

* The oiroumstanoes of this case were deserving of attention in other re- 
spects. I have therefore not included it among cases of " Precipitate Birth.*' 
It nevertheless is another excellent example in regard to the height from 
which a child may fall. How often the truths of actual life ridicule the 
fancies of mere theorists ! 



134 § 115. RESULTS OF PRECIPITATE BIRTH. 

occurs especially beneath the occipital aponeurosis, and upon or 
more rarely beneath the pericranium, the latter in the most various 
positions, even at the base of the brain ; dislocation of the cervical 
vertebrse (? Ploucquet) ; finally, and more especially, fracture of the 
skull-bones. These fractures are commonly and almost exclusively 
confined to the parietal bones, one or both, and that chiefly in the 
region of the vertex, but they are by no means exclusively confined 
to the left one, as has been supposed a priori, because of the assump- 
tion that when the shoulders are in passing the child turns sideways, 
and that most commonly with the face to the mother's right 
thigh. Of course these fractures, once originated, may extend from 
the point of contact at the vertex into the frontal, occipital, or 
squamous portion of the temporal bone, and are found to do so. 
But it is always easy to perceive in such fractures a certain amount 
of radiation from a centre. When we find comminuted fractures 
of several bones simultaneously, such as both parietal, the frontal, 
and occipital bones, the supposition of their having been produced 
by the accidental fall of the child is all the less probable, inasmuch 
as from the elasticity of the skull-bones of newborn children no 
contrecoup can take place in them. 

Of course, the fall of the child at its birth presupposes a precipitate 
delivery. This occurs also in those delivered secretly, of whom a 
large portion are certainly also primipara. The proof of this is to 
be found in the great number of children constantly found dead in a 
large town like Berlin, containing more than half-a-million of souls, 
the result of secret deliveries, which must therefore have been very 
rapid, if not actually precipitate, because, otherwise they could not 
have been concealed. Experience has, however, given me also 
another proof of the truth of this, namely, that very frequently 
the body of the newborn child is brought before us along 
with the placenta still connected with it. In accordance with this 
experience, we are indubitably justified in asserting that those 
secretly delivered {even if jprimiparai) may have a precipitate labour , 
and therefore such a statement made by such a criminal at the bar 
is not at once to be set aside as a lying fabrication. 

Where in such a case injuries, which have been proved by the 
dissection to exist, are declared to be the result of the fall of the 
child in consequence of precipitate delivery, the diagnosis may be 
very difficult ; a simple ecchymosis, or bloody coagula beneath the 
occipital aponeurosis are of no value as proof of a blow on the head 



§ 115. RESULTS OF PRECIPITATE BIRTH. 136 

in this manner, since it has akeady been pointed out (§ 109, p. 115, 
Vol. III.), that such appearances are daily found in the bodies of new- 
bom children, whatever may have been the circumstances of their 
birth. In regard to this I must also warn against those extravasa- 
tions and exudations of blood into or beneath the cellular tissue of 
the scalp — ^which are solely caused by the process of putrefaction — 
being taken for the results of mechanical violence, especially as pro- 
duced by the fall of the child upon a hard floor, as thereby lament- 
able mistakes might be produced. Thus even an observer so accurate 
and experienced as Biittner (Case I., loc, cit,) assumed that the 
cause of the ecchymosis of the head of a child examined by him, did 
not depend upon the fall of the child at its birth, as asserted by the 
accused, but upon violence inflicted on it. Though the not very 
accurate description may be trusted, there is the greatest probability 
for supposing that this appearance was only the result of putrefac- 
tion — ^a matter which, eighty years ago, was neither so well known 
nor so much attended to as now.''^ A mistake of this character 
will not, however, be difficult to avoid, if it is remembered that 
such a putrefactive effusion of decomposed blood only occurs in 
bodies already far advanced in putrescence; and in such cases, unless 
there be other indicative appearances, it is better to refrain from 
answering the question. Has this child been injured by falEng on 
the floor at its birth, or by other violence ? It is extremely difficult 
to distinguish considerable ecchymoses or cerebral haemorrhages, as 
well as fissures and fractures of the parietal bones, said to have been 
caused by the child falling on the floor at its birth, from similar 
accidents, the result of injury to the child in the birth, since the ap- 
pearances on dissection are the same in both cases. Corroborative 
evidence may in such cases sometimes assist in arriving at the correct 
conclusion, for instance, the discovery of sawdust, gravel, plaster, 
lime, earth, or similar matters in the hair and on the head of the 
child, when it has fallen on a floor covered with the like. In doubt- 
ful cases I have again to recommend a prudent and negative con- 
struction of the opinion, such as, ^^The dissection has revealed no 
proof contrary to the supposition that the child during its birth,*' — 
or, ^^ that the child has had its head injured by falling on the floor 
at its birth, in the manner described,^' whereby at the same time 

• The thorax, abdomen, and back of the body were " externally stained 
of a greenish-blue;" the 'cranial coverings "already swollen by air;" the 
brain was " already in a perfectly fluid condition." 



136 § 115. RESULTS OF PRECIPITATE BIRTH. 

the truth is expressed, and, as experience has taught me, the judicial 
object is efficiently attained. In regard to the most important 
query in each individual case of this character; whether the injuries 
on the head of the child, ascribed to a fall on the floor, are not 
rather the result of intentional violence inflicted after birth ? ex- 
perience has dictated the following line of conduct. Simple appear- 
ances, such as ecchymoses, simple fissures (fractures) of one or both 
parietal bones, without injury to the scalp, and without any other, 
traces of injury upon the body of the child, speak for the great 
possibihty of the truth of the statement of the accused in regard to 
the injuries having arisen from the fall of the child at its birth, and 
this may rise to certamty should other circumstances be ascertained 
in regard to the individual case corroborative of this assertion. Since ex- 
perience teaches that actual infanticide, intentional murder of the child 
immediately after its birth, is always attended with great barbarity and 
violence^ a fact which finds an evident explanation in the disposition 
of the mother, and her endeavour to attain her end with certainty. 
And accordingly, should this violence have been directed against the 
head of the child (which is by no means commonly the case, since 
suffocation, strangling and injuries with stabbing and cutting instru- 
ments are by far the most frequent causes of death in infanticide), 
much more severe and complicated injuries are found than those 
above-described as the usual results of the fall of the child on the 
floor at its birth, such as smashing and fracture of several different 
skull-bones, subaponeurotic isolated blood coagula on different parts 
of the scalp, laceration of the occipital aponeurosis and of the cere- 
bral membranes, wounds of the brain, &c., and in general ecchy- 
moses, and scratches on other parts of the body (p. 134, Vol. III.). 
All authors have most justly recommended in doubtful cases of 
death of the child by a fall at its birth, to ascertain and take into 
consideration, the diameters of the head and shoulders of the diild, 
the capacity and inchnation of the maternal pelvis, the position of 
the vagina, the condition of the perineum, the whole circumstances 
of the birth, particularly in regard to the posture of the parturient 
female and the height from which the child was stated to have fallen, 
as well as the nature of the floor upon which it fell, as also whether 
this floor was hard, elastic, or perhaps pultaceous in consistence ? 
Indubitably a knowledge of all these circumstances without excep- 
tion is of the greatest importance for the medical jurist, who may 
think himself lucky when he can so ascertain them, as to be able to 



§ 116. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 137 

base his opinion upon them. Among the limited population of a 
village or small town, where the life of each individual is as it were 
under the control of all his fellow-townsmen, this will happen often 
enough, but medical jurists in towns of any size, may at once 
resign all hope of obtaining any such corroborative proof! It has 
been forgotten in regard to this very good doctrine, that the pelvis 
of the mother can only be examined, when — ^we have the mother be- 
fore us, who at the time of the dissection is usually wholly unknown ; 
and that the nature of the floor can only be ascertained when we 
know where the birth has taken place, &c. In large populatious, 
however, such cases occur in actual life after quite a different 
fashion. The body may be found anywhere and brought for exami.- 
nation. No one knows its origin ; pubUc proclamations are issued 
by the Judge presiding at the examination, in order to ascertain the 
mother, but in most instances these are in vain ! The same thing 
may be said as to the umbilical cord. We are told to examine its 
length and how and where it has been divided. But, besides that 
these circumstances are not of particular importance — since cases 
will presently be related both of very long cords and of very short 
ones, both of cords which have been torn across, and of those which 
have been entire — it has again to be remarked that very often 
nothing at all can be ascertained in regard to the umbilical cord, 
when for instance it has been entirely torn out of the umbilicus, or 
when only the part attached to the child is to hand, and not also the 
placentar portion, of which the cases following afford examples. So 
that in actual practice the medical jurist is in general restricted to 
the appearances to be found in the body of the child, and I have 
already related how these are to be estimated in relation to this 
question. The following cases could not, in my opinion, have .been 
decided otherwise than has been done. 

§ 116. Illustrative Cases. 

Case CCCLXXV. — ^Death from Haemorrhage, Drowning, or 
Fall on the Floor at Birth ? 

The body of a male child was found in the water. It was twenty 
inches long, and weighed seven pounds. The diameters (of the 
head, three and a-haJf, four and a-half, and five inches; of the 
shoulders, five and a-half inches; and of the hips, three inches and 
one-quarter) were by no means small, and all the other appearances 



138 § 116. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

rendered the maturity of the child indubitable. Its live-birth was 
also distinctly proved. No injury was found externally, particularly 
on the head. But beneath the occipital aponeurosis the whole 
region of the vertex was covered with an extravasation of blood one 
line thick, and there was a fracture of the right parietal bone run- 
ning transversely from the sagittal suture in a straight Une, 
one inch and a-half long, with sharp unecchymosed edges. The 
brain in this tolerably fresh body was already changed to a dirty red 
pultaceous mass, but on its surface and base a considerable amount 
of hyperfiemia could be distinctly perceived. The cord was com- 
pletely torn out of the umbilicus. In respect to a possible death 
from haemorrhage, however, besides the cranial hyperfiemia, there was 
a very great deal of blood in the liver, moderate congestion of the 
vena cava, and the lungs were of a beautiful rosy-red colour mottled 
with blue. Moreover, the lungs presented none of the symptoms 
betokening death from drowning. The trachea (and the stomach) 
was perfectly empty and pale, while the heart contained no blood. 
Accordingly death was not accounted for either by haemorrhage or 
drowning, and we decided that the child had died from apoplexy. 
" which most probably owed its origin to a fall on the floor at birth.^' 
The mother was never ascertained. 

Case CCCLXXVI. — Fall of the Child on the Floor 
AT Birth. 

In the middle of March the body of a newborn child, still attached 
to the placenta, was found lying in the streets. The maturity of 
this child could not be doubted (it weighed no less than eight 
pounds and three-quarters, and measured nineteen inches in length). 
The head was not small, though not proportionate to the weight of the 
child; its diameters were three, four, and five inches respectively, that of 
the shoulders five inches and three-quarters, and of the hips four inches. 
The umbilical cord entire, as has been said, measured thirty-two 
inches. The docimasia pulmonaris proved indubitably that the 
chad had lived, and the cause of its death remained to be discovered. 
The body was very fresh, and displayed externally no trace of any 
injury, and particidarly none upon the head. Close to one another 
upon the left parietal bone, and on the left side of the frontal bone, 
there were two extravasations of half-coagulated blood beneath the 
pericranium, each one line thick and about the size of a farthing. 



§ 116. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 139 

There was another similar but smaller extravasation upon the occi- 
pital bone. The bones were uninjured, the vascular meninges and 
the sinuses were very full of blood; the dissection revealed nothing 
else of any consequence. Accordingly death must have resulted 
from cerebral hypersemia, and in our summary opinion, after declaring 
the maturity and live-birth of the child, we went on to say that the 
death of the child had resulted from apoplexy, and in regard to the 
cause of this, '^no other supposition seemed to be more probable 
than that the apoplexy had been produced by the child's falling on 
the floor at its birth, which (from the placenta having been extruded 
simultaneously with the child) must be regarded as having been very 
rapid.'' In this case also the mother was never discovered. 

Case CCCLXXYII. — ^Deliveuy in the eeect posture. — ^Fall 
OF THE Child on the Floor. 

The fall in this case took place before an eye-witness. The 
mother, an unmarried jmmiparous factory girl, gave simtiltaneous 
birth to both placenta and child while standing at her work. Her 
fellow-workwoman immediately brought other females to her assist- 
ance, and the child was found to be dead. It weighed seven pounds, 
measured nineteen inches in length, and presented all the other signs of 
maturity. The docimasia pulmonaris proved that it must have 
breathed. Beneath the scalp we found upon the vertex an extrava- 
sation of coagulated blood one line thick; there was in this case also 
no injury to the bones, but apoplectic cerebral hyperaemia, as in the 
foregomg one. We did not learn whether the umbilical cord had 
been divided at the birth or subsequently; at the dissection it lay 
torn across and unbound. We declared that the results of the dis- 
section completely confirmed the statement as to the circumstances 
of the dehvery. The further investigation into the case as one of 
supposed infanticide was at once dropped, and even the mother was 
not brought before us for investigation. 

Case CCCLXXVIII.— Delivery in the erect posture.— Fall 
OF the Child in the Street. 

This case resembled the foregoing one in so far that the precipi- 
tate birth was in it also observed by a trustworthy eye-witness. The 
unmarried maid-servant, L., at the end of her concealed pregnancy, 



140 § 116. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

accompanied her mistress in the evening to the Christmas fair, and 
followed her home, with a basket on her arm, heavyladen with pur- 
chases. On the road she was suddenly surprised by the birth, after 
having suffered and suppressed her labour-pains for about half-an- 
hour, and the child, as she afterwards said, " popped " out at once. 
There was much hard frozen snow lying on the street, and the child 
fell head-foremost on this, the umbilical cord being said to be torn 
across,-— a statement certainly confirmed by the appearance of its 
edges. Jj. fell fainting in the street, but speedily came to herself 
again, and found the child dead, as was also seen to be the case by 
her mistress (who, alarmed, had run off for medical assistance) on her 
return. It had indubitably breathed after its birth, and had died 
from cerebral haemorrhage, since, besides extensive congestion of the 
brain, we found one drachm of blood extravasated on the basis cranii. 
It was also interesting to find in this child a patch of defective ossi- 
fication in the right parietal bone {Fide § 110.), in which there was 
a piece of bone about the size of a halfpenny, quite transparent, in 
the centre of which a fissure, one line in breadth, and with faintly 
serrated and ecchymosed edges, was visible. We decided that the 
child was mature, had been born alive, had died from apoplexy, and 
that '' there was the highest probability for supposing that this apo- 
plexy had been produced by the circumstances attendant on the 
birth, neither the dissection nor the documentary evidence giving 
any reason to suppose any other cause of death more probable.'* 

Case CCCLXXIX. — Precipitate Birth. — Fali^ of the Child 
ON the Floor. — ^Death of the Mother. 

The results of the dissection in this case were very remarkable. 
Under circumstances unknown alike to me and to everyone else, a 
primipara, aged twenty-four, had secretly given birth to a child, and 
had died immediately after delivery, from haemorrhage, as was proved 
by the medico-legal dissection. The body was brought before us 
wrapped in a sheet, in which also lay a placenta, already putrid; whether 
the deceased had been delivered in bed, which, from the appearances 
on the child, was not probable, or whether she had yet time after the 
birth and before her death to lay herself in bed, or whether she was 
laid there as a corpse by others, was not known. It was important 
to find a rupture of the perineum one inch in length, and the cord 
torn across five inches from the placenta, its edges corresponding 



§ 116. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 141 

exactly with that portion of the cord still attached to the child; the 
whole length of the umbihcal cord was thirteen and a-half inches. 
The child was twenty inches in length, weighed six pounds and a-half, 
but had a small head, its diameters measuring respectively three 
inches and one-quarter, three inches and three-quarters, and four 
inches and one-half. The diameter of the shoulders was only four 
inches and one-half, and that of the hips three inches and one-quar- 
ter. Beneath, the scalp there was a layer of dark coagulated blood 
one line thick. The right parietal bone displayed a transverse frac- 
ture three inches long, and the squamous portion of the right tem- 
poral bone had a similar fracture one inch in lengtL The entire 
brain was in this case remarkably enough enclosed in a layer of very 
dark coagulated blood. Externally there was not a trace of injury, 
neither on the head, neck, nor on any other part of the body. The 
docimasia pulmonaris proved that the child had lived after its birth. 
The very extraordinary appearances found on dissecting this body, so 
dijBferent from what is usual, were sufficient to enjoin prudence. We 
did not feel justified in saying more than what follows : that the fatal 
apoplexy had been produced by external violence; that the nature of 
this violence had not been revealed by the dissection ; that it was 
however possible that the death of the child might have been caused 
by its falling on the floor from precipitate birth.'' Since the mother 
was dead, the case was not further followed out, and we were not 
even required to inspect the locality of the delivery. 

Case C(X5LXXX. — Death op the Child prom a Pall at its 
BiETH, OE Infanticide? 

The following was another example of those cases in which, when 
the medical jurist is necessitated, under dubious circumstances, to 
give an opinion fraught with important consequences, he is greatly 
comforted to find his opinion justified and confirmed by the subse- 
quent confession of the accused. Tlie body of a newborn female 
child was found stufied into the ash-heap in the kitchen of a house. 
The mother was discovered, after the dissection, to be a servant in 
the house, who four years previously had given birth to a mature 
child still alive. The body, completely covered with ashes, was that 
of a child nearly mature, seventeen inches and a-half long, six 
pounds in weight, with such relatively small diameters as readily to 
permit the assumption of a precipitate birth, namely, of the head 



142 § 116. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

three and one-quarter, four, and four and three-quarter inches ; of 
the shoulders four inches ; and of the hips three inches. The um- 
bilical cord was nine inches and a-half long, and from its edges 
seemed to have been torn across; the placenta, which was found 
previous to the discovery of the child, was probably bom simulta- 
neously with it. There was here also no trace of injury visible ex- 
ternally, particularly on the head. The child had indubitably lived. 
The whole of the right half of the inner side of the occipital aponeurosis 
'was covered with a layer of coagulum one line thick. A similar extrava- 
sation, about the size of a shilling, lay over the pericranium upon the 
vertex. The right parietal bone was fractured longitudinally and 
transversely, the right side of the frontal bone transversely, the left 
parietal bone longitudinally in two different places, and also trans- 
versely; and finally, the occipital bone was fissured and fractured 
throughout its whole length. The entire brain was everywhere hy- 
persemic, and in the hollows of the basis cranii we found isolated 
extravasation of dark coagulated blood each one line thick. The 
age, live-birth, and cause of the child^s death, were easily discovered. 
In accordance with the principles we have already laid down, we had 
no hesitation in declaring, in our summary opinion, after the dissec- 
tion, that these fatal cranial injuries had not been produced by the fall 
of the child at its birth, but by violence which must have been inflicted 
on the head of the child after its birth. The mother, who was soon 
afterwards discovered, after a primary denial, confessed at repeated 
examinations, that she (five days before the dissection) was surprised 
by her labour while standing at the fireplace, which was paved with 
stone. The child was suddenly expelled, and fell head-foremost on 
the fioor. After a short fainting fit she revived, and intending 
to kill both herself and the child, she seized it and ^' struck its head 
several times upon the stone hearth,^^ subsequently concealing the 
body. She was condemned by the jury court to six years' penal 
servitude. 

Case CCCLXXXI. — ^Torrus taken out of a Cesspool. — ^Death by 

FALL OF THE ChILD AT ITS BlRTH. 

This was another case of birth simultaneous with the placenta, but in 
different circumstances from those of the foregoing cases. A newborn 
female child was found in a cesspool rolled in rags right beneath the 
seat. The child, without the placenta, weighed eight pounds and a-half; 
it was twenty inches long, and its cranial diameters were, three inches 



§ 116. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 143 

and one-quarter, four inches and one-quarter, and five inches, and 
the diameter of the shoulders was of the very considerable breadth of 
five inches and one-half. All the other appearances were in favour 
of the maturity of the child, which must also have respired after its 
birth. Beneath the occipital aponeurosis we found a blood coagu- 
lura one line thick extending from the left temporal bone to the left 
frontal bone, and beneath the periosteum at this part there were 
several isolated ecchymoses. The bones were all uninjured. The 
cerebral veins and sinuses, however, displayed a considerable amount 
of hypersemia, which was the only cause of death that could be dis- 
covered in the child. The fact of the child being rolled in rags 
proved that it could not have been bom over the cesspool, but must 
have been thrown in after its birth ; and this consideration, together 
with the simultaneous expulsion of the placenta, which made it pro- 
bable that the birth had been precipitate, as well as the other appear- 
ances on and in the body of the child, made us assume that there was 
" the highest probability " that the fatal apoplexy had been caused 
by the fall of the child upon a hard floor at its birth. All inquiries 
after the mother proved fruitless. 

Case CCCLXXXII. — Child taken out op a night-chair. — 
Death by pall at its Birth. — The body made away with for 
economical reasons. 

The body of a mature newborn boy was found in a night-chair, 
along with a placenta weighing eleven ounces ; the child weighed six 
pounds and a-half, and was eighteen inches in length; but the dia- 
meter of the head and shoulders were small (three, four, and four 
and a-half inches for the head, and four inches and a-quarter for 
the shoulders). The portion of the umbilical cord attached to the 
child was fourteen inches long, torn across with ragged edges, and 
tied. Beneath the pericranium, on the left parietal bone, there were 
a few isolated ecchymoses ; no other trace of violence was to be found, 
either externally or internally, upon the body, which was per- 
fectly fresh. Death had been caused by cerebral hypersemia, not by 
suffocation. Eespiratory life was indubitable. The placenta being 
found along with the child, the torn umbiUcal cord, the small dia- 
meters of the head and shoulders, and the secret delivery, were all in 
favour of the supposition of a precipitate birth ; and the ecchymoses 
on the parietal bone made it also probable that the child had 
fallen on its head at its birth. A fall could not, however. 



144 § 116. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

have had this effect if the birth had taken place upon the night- 
chair, and the child had fallen upon the soft semifluid (in May) mass 
of excrement; and in this case also death would have been caused 
by suffocation, and not by cerebral hypersemia. Accordingly it was 
to be supposed that this viable and live-bom child had died soon 
after its birth from cerebral apoplexy, produced by falling upon 
some hard floor at its birth, and that after its death it had been flung 
into the night-chair in order to save the expense of burial and more 
completely to conceal its birth. The case was not further followed 
judicially. 

Case CCCLXXXIII. — ^Dbath by a fall at Bieth? By Suffo- 
cation IN Ashes? or by Drowning in a Privy? 

One night in January, L., secretly pregnant for the first time, left 
her bed on account of the violence of her pains, and stood beside the 
stove, when, along with the most vehement pain, she suddenly felt ^Hhe 
child fall out of her private parts/^ She heard only " a dull thud 
and a single cry from the child/^ When she came to herself again, 
she found the child dead, and her next thought was how to get rid 
of it. She rolled it up in a pillowcase, carried it down to the court, 
and " dropt it into the privy/' Next day a whitish packet was seen 
in the privy covered witk ashes, upon which lay human excrement. 
This packet was taken out with a dungfork, and the child was dis- 
covered. The pit was half -filled with " dung and rubbish ;" the ex- 
crement in it was not frozen. The child was a mature female, and 
was proved by the docimasia pulmonaris to have lived. Its whole 
body was thickly strewn with ashes, none, however, had entered the 
nostrils, mouth, or pharynx. The umbilical cord had uneven, ragged 
edges. The stomach was empty, in particular it contained neither 
ashes nor human excrement, and the vena cava contained very little 
blood. The trachea and its divisions were perfectly empty, pale, and 
normal. The lungs on being incised gave vent to bloody froth. The 
heart contained only a few drops of blood in its right cavities. 
The oesophagus was also perfectly empty. The internal surface of 
the occipital aponeurosis had a few isolated blood coagula, each one 
line thick, upon the region of the vertex and occiput; there was an 
obtuse angled fracture two inches long in the left parietal bone, which 
extended for half-an-inch towards the right parietal bone ; parallel 
with this fracture there was also a depression of the left parietal 



§ 116. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 145 

bone half-an-inch in length, which likewise extended towards the 
right parietal bone. One-quarter of an inch from this fracture there 
was in the right parietal bone a similar fracture onlj one-third of an 
inch in length. The cranial bones were unusually thin at the situa- 
tion of the fractures. The cerebral membranes were only moderately 
congested, and the sinuses almost empty; on the other hand, at the 
base of the right cerebral hemisphere there was an extravasation of 
dark coagulated blood the size of a bean. All the other skull- 
bones were uninjured. The child, therefore, had died from apo- 
plexy. The position of the fractures, the extreme thinness of the 
parietal bone around these fractures, which obviously had their centre 
of radiation in the left parietal bone, induced us at the time of the 
dissection, without any previous knowledge of the circumstances 
attending the birth, to assume that they had been caused by the fall 
of the child at its birth, and this was coniSrmed by the subsequent 
confession of the mother, and by the blood-stains on the floor of the 
room. The trifling character of these cranial injuries were opposed 
to the idea of any violence having been otherwise inflicted on the 
child, particularly by the mother ; neither could they be regarded as 
having been produced on the dead body by the dungfork, because 
not only did the bones display traces of vital reaction, but the soft 
parts were also perfectly uninjured. Neither could these injuries 
have been produced by the fall of the child into the privy, because 
this contained no hard substance, not even frozen human excrement. 
-The child, consequently, had died from apoplexy produced by falling 
on the floor at its birth, and, since not one symptom of sufi'ocation 
was found, it must have been already dead when it was thrown into 
the privy, and could not have died from suffocation produced either 
in this way or by means of the ashes. 

Case CCCLXXXIV. — ^Dbath by a fall at Bieth, or Infanticide P 

An unmarried woman, who had most persistently denied to the 
last her very visible pregnancy both to her mistress and fellow- 
servants, was delivered in May, either, as she at first asserted, in bed, 
at the foot of which there was in the room a beam supported by an 
iron pillar, or, as she subsequently stated, '' the child suddenly fell 
from her genitaV after a violent pain as she was returning from 
the court to her room. The child, stated to have been bom dead, 
was dissected three days subsequently. It was a mature female child, 
VOL. in. 1^ 



146 § 116. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

and the docimasia pulmonaris proved that it had indubitably lived. 
The pericranium and the cerebral membranes were much congested, 
and about six drachms (imp.) of blood were effosed over the surface 
of the bram. The cause of this fatal extravasation was found to be 
fracture of both the parietal bones. In our written opinion we state : 
'' Both of these bones were by no means so completely ossified as they 
usually are, but displayed many thin transparent patches in which were 
visible openings with serrated edges, just as is often seen in cases of 
defective ossification in the skulls of newborn children. But frac- 
tures were found in both of the parietal bones, and in both of them 
quite independent of these congenital defects. The fact of both sides 
of the head being injured in this manner renders it in the highest 
degree probable that these fractures have not been caused by the 
child falling with its head on a hard floor at its birth, as stated by 
the accused, since in such a case, for evident reasons, one or more 
fractures or fissures are found in one bone, at that particular spot, 
generally of one parietal bone, on which the head was struck at its 
fall. We do not require, however, to state, that if the accused was 
delivered in bed, as she stated at her first examination, the idea of 
such a fall could not for one instant be entertained. There are, how- 
ever, other appearances corroborative of our supposition that these 
fractures of the skull were most probably not caused by a* fall at 
birth, but by some other external violence. We refer to the dark, 
livid crescentic stain, three quarters of an inch in length, right under 
the lower lip, and the blackish-red colour of both of the child's lips. 
The stain referred to exactly resembles the mark upon the body of 
the impress of a finger made shortly before death. It therefore ap- 
pears probable that the accused has compressed with her hand the 
mouth of her child just bom in order to prevent it crying, and the 
impression visible on tlie body proves that this has been done with 
no gentle hand. Such a manipulation of the head of a child like this, 
with skull-bones partially quite thin and unossified, compression in 
such a case with one or with both hands, might very readily originate 
the fractures found, while it is just as likely that any other violence 
inflicted on the child^s head may have caused these injuries, as we have 
observed iu similar cases. Mere unititeiitional sclf-as.si stance at the 
birth cannot be regarded as a probable cause of these iDJuries, since 
in a case of rapid birth there is no need for any such Belf'a>:i5istance, 
and it wouldj moreover, have been otherwise made known by other 
[lees, such as scratches, none of which have been found in 




'«^- -I 



§ 117. HAEMORRHAGE FROM THE CORD. 147 

this case.'' Accordingly we decided — 1. That the child was mature 
and viable ; 2. That it had lived during and after its birth ; 3. That it 
had died from cerebral haemorrhage, the result of injuries ; 4. That 
it was extremely probable that these injuries had not arisen from the 
fall of the child at its birth, but from violence inflicted in some other 
manner ; 6. That in regard to the nature of this violence no conclu- 
sions can be drawn from the dissection; 6. That it is, however, im- 
probable that this violence has been inflicted by the self-assistance of 
the parturient woman during the act of birth.* 

§ 117. — CONTINIT^TION. — (6) H^KOBBHAGE PILOM THE UmBIUCAL 

Cord. 
Can a newborn child sufler a fatal heemorrhage from the umbilical 



The earlier writers assumed too much when, from the ascertained 
facts of life after birth, and an untied cord on the body, they con- 
cluded that death had in this way occurred from haemorrhage. But 
it is just as unjustifiable to deduce the impossibility of death from 
haemorrhage in this manner, for the well-known theoretical reason, 
that the pulmonary circulation is established after birth. Unpre- 
judiced observation shows that death may occur in this manner, but 
that it very seldom does so even in circumstances apparently most 
favourable to it. In my own long-continued medico-legal experience, 
which has seldom been exceeded in extent, I have never observed one 
single case of this character, though I have seen no fewer than six 
cases in which the cord was found to be divided close to the umbili- 
cus, and cases in which the portion of cord left untied on the body 
has been one, one and a-half, and two inches in length, in some of 
which it has been cut, and in others torn across, yet without the 
occurrence of death from haemorrhage, are cases of daily occurrence. 
And very naturally it is so, since, as a general rule, the funis 
is not tied in cases of secret birth, and every medical jurist has in 
regard to the dissections of newborn children almost in every in- 
stance to deal with foetuses bom in secret. Since, however, it is of 
more importance for the Judge in each individual case to know whe- 
ther a child kas died from haemorrhage in this manner, than to know 
whether it can do so, of course, for logical reasons, the fact of death 
from haemorrhage must in every case be first ascertained. This, 

• Fwfe also Cases CCCXC.-CCCXCVI. 

l2 



148 § 118. HiEMORRHAGE FROM THE CORD. 

however, presents no diagnostic symptoms in newborn children differ- 
ent from those in every other age, and I beg, therefore, to refer to § 21, 
Spec. Div. (p. 2, Vol II). Whether the fatal haemorrhage has occurred 
from injuries or from the umbilical cord, general anaemia is the most 
important appearance in all newborn children who have bled to 
death j but in newborn children, as well as in adults, the cerebral 
veins from hypostasis appear to take no part in this bloodlessness, 
and we also find external hypostases (post-mortem stains) as well as 
other internal hypostases, particularly of the lungs, which, moreover, 
in cases of death from haemorrhage, have their upper surface of an 
extremely characteristic pale-grey, mottled with blackish-blue, and 
on being incised appear to contain only air, and not one drop of 
blood (vid. loc, cit). But in regard to newborn children, which are 
more easily got rid of than the bodies of adults, and often lie a long 
time before they are accidentally discovered, I have to repeat the 
warning, the necessity for which is strongly enforced by a perusal of 
the earlier authors, not to mistake that anaemia which is merely the pro- 
duct of putrescence for anaemia from fatal haemorrhage. In dubious 
cases, therefore, where putrefaction has already advanced so far that the 
colour of the skin and the internal organs can be no longer ascer- 
tained, and the existing anaemia is to be ascribed to evaporation of 
the blood, the medical jurist must refrain from giving any opinion as 
to the fact of the occurrence of death from haemorrhage. The 
error of the earUer writers, who supposed that haemorrhage from the 
umbiUcal cord gave rise to a combined death from suffocation and 
from haemorrhage, requires no refutation. The simplest criticism of 
any of the cases quoted in proof of this will show at once that the 
children have not bled from the funis. 

§118. Continuation. — Diagnosis. 

If in any given case death from haemorrhage has been determined, 
it yet remains to be ascertained, whether it has arisen from the um- 
biUcal cord or no. The probability of this will approach to certainty 
when no other injury, not even of the slightest character, is found 
upon the body ; but even in such a case we must reflect on the pos- 
sibility of fatal haemorrhage from internal pathological causes, which 
I myself have twice observed to have taken place from the rectum. 
Consequently we must investigate whether those conditions exist in 
the body which experience teaches us favour haemorrhage from the 



S 118. HAEMORRHAGE FROM THE CORD. 149 

funis, or the reverse. A mere staining of the body or the coverings in 
which it has been found with dried blood can, of course, prove 
nothing, since this may arise from the deKvery itself, or from an um- 
bilical haemorrhage that has not been fatal, while, on the other hand, 
actual blood-stains on the body may be washed off either intention- 
ally or accidentally by the water into which it has been thrown. In 
regard, however, to the conditions mentioned general experience is, 
unanimous in permitting no doubt to rest upon them: — 1* The 
umbilical cord must be separated between the umbilicus and 
placenta. Mende's opinion,* that there is no reason for any such 
necessity, since the length of the cord does not hinder the passage of 
the blood which is continually taken up by the placenta as it flows 
thither, though supported by the evidence derived from injections, is 
not proved by any actual experience and is even theoretically very doubt- 
ful. 2. The fact that the part of the cord left on the body has not been 
tied may indeed make the case probable, but can of course of itself 
prove nothing (always presupposing that death from haemorrhage has 
been ascertained). For the ligature which may have been originally 
present, may have been accidentally removed during the transport or 
unclothing of the body, or it may have been washed away in the 
water in which the body has been found, &c. It is also supposable, 
however improbable, that a ligature has for some reason or other 
been applied after the death of the child, not having been so previ- 
ously. 3. The sooner the unbound funis has been divided after the 
commencement of respiratory life, the more readily will haemorrhage 
from the umbilical arteries occur, and the reverse. The dissection 
will certainly only in unusual circumstances be able to determine the 
duration of the respiratory life, since the docimasia pulmonaris will 
prove but a short life in any case. Moreover, an observation of 
Hohl's t gives a very remarkable proof that fatal haemorrhage may 
take place from the umbilical cord even after a life of many hours' 
duration. About midday a midwife tied before his eyes. a very gela- 
tinous cord, firm and sure; she stated that she found all right in the 
evening ; the mother herself, about midnight, laid the child dry and 
remarked nothing unusual ; next morning the child was found dead, 
and at the dissection it was seen -to be bloodless and healthy. 4. 
The separation of the portion of cord left on the child must be 
as close to the navel as possible. The shorter it is, the more easily 
does haemorrhage occur, the longer it is the more easily will 
♦ Handb. der get. Med. iii. s. 279. t Op. cit., 588. 



150 § 118. HiEMORRHAGE FROM THE CORD. 

fatal hsemorrhage be preveuted by the retraction of the arteries. 
Therefore the danger of haemorrhage is greatest when the nmbilical 
cord is divided close to the umbilicus. Nevertheless, I have 
observed four such cases (CCCLXXI., CCCLXXV., CCCLXXXVI., 
CCCLXXXVII.) without any fatal haemorrhage ; in the other two 
cases previously referred to the children were bom dead. 5. The 
mode in which the division has been effected is not without its in- 
fluence in regard to the danger of the haemorrhage, as I, although 
without any personal experience, must, nevertheless, assume to be 
correct in accordance with those generally adopted theoretical rea- 
sons, which are in themselves correct. The danger is therefore 
greater, when the funis is divided with a sharp implement, cut, than 
when it is torn across, as in the latter case the arteries are necessarily 
compressed. In regard to the question whether the umbilical card can 
he spowUmeously ruptured {at bi/rth) ; or whether any such statement 
on the part of the accused should not be at once rejected ? Negrier, 
in Angers (subsequently Speth also), instituted experiments in which 
he proved the strength of the cord by suspending weights on it.* 
These experiments, however, prove nothing, since they produced only 
a gradual extension of the cord, whilst the rupture at birth is pro- 
duced by a sudden jerk; they prove nothing, because the force 
exerted by the child in falling is not taken into consideration; chiefly, 
however, they prove nothing, because they were made upon dead 
umbilical cords, and the resistance of a dead organ is perfectly 
different from the same while alive. I have already related my own 
very convincing experiments in regard to this {§ 6, Special Division, 
p. 244, Vol. I.), and I supplement them here by the results of very 
numerous experiments made upon perfectly fresh umbilical cords. 
When such a cord is simply attempted to be torn by the hands alone, 
this attempt is often unsuccessful, because the smooth and slippery 
cord glides through the hands ; but this can be prevented either by 
twisting it round the hands, or by holding it with a dry towel ; but 
I can safely assert that even with such preparation, and by employ- 
ing a sudden and powerful jerk, it is extremely difficult to tear an 
umbilical cord across, and this is only possible by means of rapidly 
repeated violent jerks. This experiment may be repeated by anyone 
on the first best cord he falls in with (and he will always obtain a 
similar result). But the cords with which we experimented were 

♦ Annales d'Hygi^ne, publ. Vol. xxv. p. 126. Transl. in Henke's 
Zeitsohr., Bd. xliii. s. 182, &o. 



§ 118. HEMORRHAGE FROM THE CORD. 161 

dead, and had been so on the average for two or three days at least ! 
the cord at birth is still ahve, and Hving organs have very much less 
power of resistance than dead ones, as all onr experiments havje in- 
dubitably proved. Since now fatal haemorrhage is more likely to 
take place when the funis is cut than when it is torn at the birth, 
whether spontaneously or intentionally, it becomes a question, 
whether we can ascertain on the body of a child which has bled to 
death the nature of the division which has been made, so as to be 
able to draw conclusions from it ? The immense importance of the 
answer on the part of the medical jurists, to the question, whether the 
cord has been torn or cut, and how even the life of an accused party 
may depend upon it, is proved by the following case, which is more 
interesting in a criminal than in a medico-legal point of view, and 
which occurred while the former penal code was still in force, by 
which the crime of infanticide was punishable with death. 

Case COCLXXXV. — Injury op the Carotid Abteey and Spinal 
Cord op a Newborn Child. — ^Doubtpul Nature op the Mode 
IN which the Umbilical Cord had been divided. 

An unmarried maidservant, pregnant for the second time, brought 
forth her child secretly in a cellar during the night, and first killed 
the child by repeated stabs with a table-knife, and subsequently in- 
flicted many external injuries on it while dying with a spade, with 
which she buried it in the sand. The right carotid was punctured 
within the thorax by one stab, another completely severed the spine 
and spinal cord between the fifth and sixth cervical vertebrse. The 
medico-legal decision of the case was consequently easy. On the 
other hand, the following circumstance shows how important it is to 
proceed with the utmost carefulness in making a legal dissection. 
The accused stated, that after the child was born, and while it was 
still connected with her by means of the funis, she went into the ad- 
joining room to fetch a table-knife with which to cut the umbilical 
cord, and that she then for the first time, with the knife in her hand, 
and overwhelmed with fear and terror, was suddenly seized with the 
idea of killing her child, which she carried out. This view reduced 
her crime in the eyes of the criminal jurist to a mere act of 
homicide. Of course, at the dissection of the body, when no one 
could guess the subsequent confession, the condition of the edges of 
the remains of the umbilical cord had been carefully examined by us. 



152 5 118. HiEMORRHAGE FROM THE CORD. 

and we had ascertamed indubitably from the irregular, serrated, and 
denticulated edges, that the umbiUcal cord had not been severed bj 
a sharp instrument, but had been torn across. The instrument em- 
ployed by the murderess, and subsequently recognised as such by 
her, was a very sharp knife, she herself having sharpened it but the 
day before along with the other knives of the house, therefore, we 
were forced to maintain our original supposition in spite of this 
statement of ih^ accused. Her crime thus regarded was " Murder/' 
for it was indubitable, that she had not fetched the knife to divide 
the umbilical cord, but to kill the child after the cord had been 
severed, involving premeditation in the eyes of the Judge. As the 
state of mind of the accosed at the time was not quite free from 
doubt, she was only condemned to the unusual punishment of many 
years imprisonment. 

The general idea that the edges of an umbilical cord are clean and 
smooth when it has been cut, and serrated, uneven, denticulated and 
irregular when it has been torn, is perfectly correct. But when a 
blunt knife has been used to divide it, and the cord has been as it were 
sawn across, and half-torn, then it may be very difficult at the time 
of the dissection to decide as to the mode in which it has been di- 
vided, and I beg of all conscientious medical jurists not to cast a 
stone at the accused, when in any case of this kind they are unable to 
state a certainty ; and I trust I shall have by these remarks made less 
experienced medical jurists aware of the necessity of caution. When 
the umbilical cord is already mummified we must soften its end in cold 
or (that we may better and more quickly to attain our end) in warm 
water, in order to examine the condition of its edges. 6. The consti- 
tution of the child is also not without its influence on the greater or 
less danger of haemorrhage ; cceteris paribm powerful and full-blooded 
children more easily bleed to death than those that are ansemic, 
which faint after a very trifling loss of blood, and thus give time for 
rescue, supposing such assistance is, from the circumstances of the 
case, possible. 7. Finally, as to the condition of the cord itself, I 
may give the statement of Hohl, as that of an experienced obstetrician, 
that fatal heemorrhage is more apt to occur from thick umbilical 
cords than from thin and small oues.^ I myself have had no ex- 
perience in this matter. True and false knots upon the cord 
present no positive obstruction to the possibility of death from 
hseraorrhage. 

♦ Op, ciL, 8. 588. 



§ 119. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 163 

§ 119. Illustbativb Cases. 
Case CCCLXXXVI. — Funis divided close to the Umbilicus. 

— No H^MOKHHAGB. 

An unmarried maidservant, who had concealed both her pregnancy 
and delivery, was seized with precipitate labour on the 5th of May, 
18 — . She stated, that on awakening from a swoon she found the 
child dead beside her. Two days subsequently the body was found 
stuffed into a pail. The child was indubitably mature, and had just 
as indubitably breathed. As interesting points of the docimasia pul- 
monaris, I may mention, that the lungs 'were not pale but of a 
beautiful flesh-red, and distinctly emitted bloody froth on being 
incised. The cord was cut off so close to the umbilicus, that at first 
sight it seemed as if the umbilicus was cicatrized. In the abdomen, 
particularly in the liver, spleen, and vena cava, there was a moderate 
amount of blood ; the urinary bladder was empty, the large intestine 
distended. The heart contained no blood. Within the cranium, 
however, there was a distinct hypersemia (not hypostasis), the skull- 
bones deeply stained ; the veins of the pia mater and the sinuses 
apparently much congested if not immoderately so. There was 
nothing else anormal. The absence of any cranial swelling, and the 
fact of the placenta being produced along with the child permitted 
us to assume, that the delivery had been precipitate. 

Case CCCLXXXVII. — ^Funis torn out of the Umbilicus. — 

No HiEMORRHAGE. 

The body of this mature newborn male child was already (in July) 
far advanced in putrescence and covered with maggots, yet the doci- 
masia pulmonaris could still be instituted, and the putrefaction did 
not prevent us from ascertaining that death had not occurred from 
hsemorrhage. The cord was completely torn out of the umbilicus. 
Nevertheless, not only did the brownish-red lungs contain much 
bloody froth, and the vena cava much blood, but we also found such 
distinct evidence of hyperaemia within the skull that we were forced 
to conclude that the child had died from apoplexy, and in answer to 
a direct query could say, that the fact of the cordis being torn out 
of the umbilicus had not the slightest connection with the cause of 
death. 



154 § 120. GUILTY, OE NOT GUILTY? 

Case CCCLXXXVIIT. — The Funis not tied. — No 

H^aiOBAHAGE. 

This (mature) child had also not bled to death from rupture of the 
cord, five inches of which were still attached to its body, but it too 
had died from cerebral hypersemia after it had breathed. The body 
was found carefully rolled up and packed in a box, and along with 
it lay the placenta which weighed about one pound (imp.), the 
average weight of the jplacenta in mature children; fifteen inches and 
one-half of cord were attached to it. The lungs were of a mottled 
brownish-red, floated, &c. I have forgotten to note the amount of 
blood in the abdomen ; on the other hand, I find mentioned among 
my not^s "distinct apoplectic hyperaemia,^' and a record of the 
summary opinion, to the efiect that the child was mature, had lived 
subsequent to birth, and had died from apoplexy, for which there 
was no evident reason. 

This case of five inches of cord being left untied without any 
hsemorrhage occurring, I only give as an example of those cases that 
come before us every day, as I have already mentioned, and in proof 
of which the history of most of the dissections made by us of new- 
bom children might be given, which would be alike wearisome and 
superfluous. 

§120. Is THE MOTHEB GuiLTY, OR NOT GuiLTY ? 

Besides the various kinds of death peculiar to children in and 
shortly after birth, the newborn child may also die after a brief life 
from one of the many various causes of so-called unnatural death 
(§ 107), only those kinds of death are, however, particularly interest- 
ing for us as medical jurists, in which, as in those already described, 
the culpability of the mother may be doubtful ; this culpability is 
unquestionable in all such cases as when the child has died from in- 
cised wounds, from poisoning with sulphuric acid, drowning, stuffing 
of its mouth with foreign bodies, &c., presupposing that no third 
person is implicated; but the guilty intent of the mother alone with 
her newborn child may be questionable when, from the examination 
of the body, it appears that the child has died from any of those pecu- 
liar causes abeady described, or that it has been sufibcated in bed, be- 
tween the thighs of its mother, or by being bom into excrement, or 
that it has been left lying in the cold so long as to die therefrom, or 



§ 120. GUILTY, OR NOT GUILTY? 156 

that the want of the performance of any of those first and necessary 
duties has proved fatal to it. All medico-legal experience in criminal 
matters teaches us that in this respect the person accused, just as 
explicably as pardonably, brings forward the most daring lies to 
prove herself innocent, and even the silliest maid becomes more or 
less logical, because she knows, that as no witness can be brought 
against her, consistent lying alone may save her. But in this, as in 
everything else, the medical jurist must neither on the one hand yield 
to the dictates of humanity alone, nor on the other, shut his ear 
altogether to those lessons which experience indubitably teaches. In 
this respect I have in the foregoing paragraphs pointed out by means 
of facts which, as well as those recorded by other observers during 
past centuries, have long been generally recognised as such, except 
by a few isolated opponents, that precipitate birth may and does 
often occur even in those bringing forth in secret and for the first 
time, and that in every possible posture, even in the erect one. Hence 
arises the possibility that, without any ciminal intent having ever 
entered the mind either during the continuance of pregnancy 
or at the moment of birth itself, the child may in a case of 
sudden delivery be fatally injured on the head, may be strangled by 
a noose of the umbilical cord, or may even bleed to death from the 
rupture of the cord. It is just as indubitable also, as has been 
proved by observations perfectly free from suspicion, even in the 
case of married women, that an urgent desire to pass urine and/aces 
may force the parturient female during her final pangs bond ^e to 
the privy or the nightchair, and that the child may thus be suddenly 
expelled into a mass of excrement and therein suffocated. Not less 
well-known, both to us and to our predecessors, is the fact of birti 
sometimes taking place during a state ofunconsciousnesSy with all those 
momentous consequences that may result therefrom in regard to the 
life and death of the child. In the same category with this may be 
placed a complete ignorance of the parturient female in regard to the 
act of delivery and the assistance necessary for a newborn child. No ex- 
culpatory plea is more frequently brought forward by the culprit at 
the bar than this, but in general it can only be allowed in the case of 
very young primipara still to some extent moral and uncorrupted. 
In close connection with this there is another exculpatory circum- 
stance, the estimation of which is easier than that just mentioned, 
since this may be based upon appearances found at the dissection, I 
refer to injuries said to have been inflicted by attempts at self' 



156 S 120. GUILTY, OR NOT GUILTY? 

delivery. These attempte at self-delivery are by no means of 
infrequent occurrence, and consist chiefly in seizing the head and 
neck of the child and dragging them outwards, when by any chance 
the deUvery is delayed after the birth of the head. The visible 
evidence of this self-delivery consists of scratches and nail-marks upon 
the face or neck, precisely such as the events of daily life make every 
one acquainted with. Severer injuries to the child, such as fractures 
of the larynx and cranial bones, are never produced in this way, since 
they require a much greater effort of violence for their production than 
can be thus exerted, always excepting, however, cases of defective ossi- 
fication of iiie cranial bones, in which a very trifling amount of compres- 
sion (even that of self-delivery) is sufficient to effect a fracture {Vide 
Case CCCLXXXIV.). On the other hand, it cannot be denied that it 
is possible for one of the cervical vertebree to become dislocated from 
the violent efforts to which the parturient female is impelled, alike by 
the violence of her pains and of her mental emotion, though I have 
never seen nor heard of such a ease. And it can just as little be denied 
that the child may be suffocated by these attempts at self-deUvery, 
and without any criminal intent whatever, though such cases are cer- 
tainly of very rare occurrence. The decision of such a case may be 
extremely difficult, since the appearances on the body in cases occur- 
ring under circumstances of bond fide self-delivery are precisely the 
same as those observed in cases of criminal intent, and the individual 
case itself, with all its circumstantialities, must afford the data on 
which to base an opinion. Thus, for instance, a man would not err 
in ascribing the appearance of nail-scratches on the head, face, or 
neck of a child's body, without any trace of any other injury, or of a 
violent death, to attempts at self-delivery, and the same appearance, if 
discovered along with other indubitable proof of violence and of 
death produced thereby, would only prove this all the more (Case 
CCCXC.) — In regard to injuries found upon the body, and the ten- 
dency to scent a crime, which may never have been committed, in 
the case of every newborn child found dead, and by means of a 
medico-legal opinion to cause the arrest and precognition of a party 
perhaps perfectly innocent, it would perhaps be as well to refer to 
some points which have been already treated of in a previous portion 
of this work. I commence by repeating the warning (§ 109, p. 116, 
Vol. III.) not to mistake the common subaponeurotic blood-coagulum 
on the child^s head, which is merely the result of the act of delivery, 
for the result of violence ; and I also again warn not to mistake the 



§ 120. GUILTY, OR NOT GUILTY? 157 

very natural-like pseudo-mark of the cord, so often seen in very fat 
children, particularly in winter, and which has been already (§ 112, 
p. 128, Vol. III.) correctly described, for the mark left by the cord 
in a case of actual strangulation; further, as in all bodies, so also in 
those of newborn children, injuries may be received when in the act 
of dying, or even after death, by falls, blows, dragging about, &c., of 
which visible traces may be left on the body {Fide § 33, Gen. Div. 
sub 2 and 4, pp. 117 and 124, Vol. I.), as also of the action of 
blunt and pointed instruments which may be employed to hft, fish, 
or drag out the bodies, the efiects of which are often seen on 
the bodies of newborn children which are so often hid away in 
holes, comers and pits of every kind, out of which they can only be 
extracted by means of instruments. Finally, it is particularly in the 
case of newborn children, which in other cases are concealed in 
dung-pits, privies, water, either running or standing, fee, that we 
find such injuries, manglings and gnawings by water-rats, swine, 
and dogs, &c., as have been already described (§ 33, Gen. Div., p. 
140, Vol. I.) as of frequent occurrence, and by reason of which 
whole limbs of the body are often found to be mutilated or entirely 
defective. 

It is true that the answer to the question of guilty, or not guilty 
(in this case of the mother accused) lies with the jury and not with 
the medical jurist; but to the latter belongs the duty of preparing 
the case for the decision of the jury by a scientific unravelling of its 
facts, and guiding their opinion where its objective facts may seem 
to be doubtfttl. An accurate and careful estimation of all the cir- 
cumstances here related as derived from experience, and a prudent 
avoidance of all misplaced and false humanity on the one hand, and 
of all fanciful suspicions of crime upon the other, will certainly en- 
able the medical jurist to attain the end desired. It is not possible 
to lay down any other roles of general application. The peculiar 
circumstances of each particular case in their entirety must decide 
the matter, as the selected examples following may sufBce to show. 
I have also intentionally included amongst these a few cases 
(CCCLXXXII.,CCCLXXXVII.,CCCLXXXIX., and CCCXCIX.), 
the special circumstances attending which must force the convic- 
tion that the peculiar mode of disposal of the foetus arose solely 
from economical grounds, namely, to save the heavy expenses of 
burial, and this is of frequent occurrence in Berlin; or to carry 
out after death that conceahnent of an illegitimate birth, which 



158 I 121. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

had been successfully practised during the short life of the 
child. 

I need scarcely remark that the question of the guilt or innocence 
of the mother^ or of those circumstances that may mitigate the for- 
mer, depend very materially upon the mental condition of the parturient 
female, and upon her responsibility at the time of the birth; but 
this portion of the subject will be entered on more at large in the 
sixth part of the Biological Division of this work. 

§ 121. Illustrative Cases. 

Case CCCLXXXIX. — Exposuee op the Child the Suspected 
Cause op its Death. 

The unmarried mother of a mature, living, and viable, though 
somewhat feeble, female child, had wrapped it up immediately after 
its birth, on the 28th of July, in linen cloth, and laid in a press on 
the floor of the house, where it was allowed to remain for ten hours 
{Fide Case CCCLXXIV). When taken out the surgeon, K, found 
a piece of the umbilical cord nine inches long and not tied attached 
to the child, which was healthy and lively. It was taken to the 
Charity Hospital, and subsequently brought to the mother in pri- 
son, where it received all necessary attention; nevertheless it died in 
prison a few weeks after, according to the certificate of the physician, 
of " Debility,— asthenia.'' Nevertheless, we were asked whether the 
exposure of the child, as proved by the documentary evidence, had not 
been productive of injurious consequences to it, and proved the 
more or less proximate cause of its death? It was made out that 
the child could not have bled from the unbound funis while lying in 
the press, since this was of the very considerable length of nine 
inches, and the child was feeble, &c. {Fide p. 149, Vol. III.) It was 
also easy to set aside the supposition that the child had died from 

the absence of atmospheric warmth while exposed almost naked 

in July. That however death must have occurred from want of 
nourishment had it remained long shut up, required no proof; such 
starvation, however, would have required several days for its pro- 
duction, and a period of ten hours could not have had any injurious 
influence of this character, since we are taught by experience that 
but little nourishment is required by newborn children during the 
first few hours of their life. The care which the child received for 
weeks before its death, proved that it had died from quite other 



§ 121. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 159 

internal causes, and probably (as the physician to the prison sup- 
posed) from a deficient vitality, which had no connection whatever 
with the exposure to which the child had been subjected. Accord- 
ingly we answered the query put to us negatively. 

Case COCXC. — ^Plea. op Selp-delivery. — ^Infanticide. 

On the 11th of November the maidservant H., pregnant for the 
second time, was suddenly seized with labour ; she declared that the 
commencement of labour was to her the first intimation of her preg- 
nancy! She delivered herself alone in her bedroom, of a female 
child, which, without looking whether it was alive or no, she left, 
with the placenta, which had immediately followed it, lying in the 
bed which she had just occupied. The midwife, who was imme- 
diately called in, took up the dead child, tied its navel-string, and 
washed it; in doing this, she remarked that the child had marks 
on its neck like the marks of finger-nails. The bones of the head were 
also, "soft, as if they had been squeezed.'^ The blood-stained 
hands and arms of the mother also proved to the midwife that she 
must have had plenty to do at the birth. At the dissection, on the 
13th of November, we found the body to be nineteen inches long, 
seven pounds and a-half in weight, still very fresh; the cranial diame- 
ters were respectively three inches and a-half, four inches and a 
quarter, and five inches and a-half, and all the other signs of matu- 
rity were present. On the right side of the neck, standing over 
one another in a triangular form, there were three small patches of 
cinnabar-red, each the size of a lentil, soft to cut, with abrasion of 
the cuticle, unecchjrmosed, presenting the evident characteristics of 
the marks of finger-nails. Neither on the head nor elsewhere were 
there any marks of violence visible externally. Of the appearances 
in the abdomen, I need only mention that the diaphragm stood be- 
neath the fifth rib ; that the liver, kidneys, and vena cava contained 
much blood, and that the urinary bladder was empty, and the large 
intestine distended. The docimasia pulmonaris proved with the 
utmost certainty that the child had lived. There were no traces of 
violence upon the larynx or cervical vertebrae. The appearances in 
the head were more important. The whole of the right parietal bone 
was covered with a blood-coagulum one line in thickness. The in- 
ferior portion of the left parietal bone was covered by a similar 
effusion half-an-inch in diameter. The right parietal bone was 



160 § 121. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

broken in two right across its middle by a semicircular fracture, the 
edges of which were serrated but not ecchymosed. Upon both the 
cerebral hemispheres there was in the region of the vertex an ex- 
travasation of dark coagulated blood one line in thickness and two 
inches in diameter. The vessels of the pia mater were tolerably 
empty, the sinuses however were congested, and the basis cranii unin- 
jured. In our written report we first proved that the child was 
mature, had lived after its birth, and had died from apoplexy, all 
which does not require to be detailed here. A similar kind of death 
might, in newborn children, we went on to say, arise from internal 
causes, though such a concatenation of appearances as those just 
described must be regarded as of extreme rarity in connection with 
natural death ; that such a possibility could not, however, be regarded 
as having occurred in this case, but that we must rather suppose that 
the death of the child had been caused by violent and unnatural 
treatment, and that this idea was supported by most convincing ap- 
pearances on the body. " Amongst these we reckon the extrava- 
sated blood-coagulum upon both parietal bones, which would not have 
been merely the result of a severe labour, since the documentary 
evidence proved that the labour in this case had not been of that 
character, but had been rapidly brought to a close, and particularly 
the fracture of the right parietal bone, which was thereby quite di- 
vided in two. Such appearances permit us to conclude with perfect 
certainty that violence has been inflicted on the head of the child, 
and that the violence has been of a blunt crushing character, such as 
strong pressure with the hands, or striking of the head against some 
hard body, &c. That no trace of any violence was found externally 
upon the head cannot be brought forward as counterproof, since our own 
personal experience in a very great number of the most diiferent cases, 
has taught us that the most important results of fatal violence are 
very often found internally, without there being any appearance on 
the body externally, which could have led to the suspicion of such 
violence. And this constitutes a most instructive warning of the 
insufiSciency of any inspection of a body by non-medical persons. 
Further, there were found upon the right side of the neck of the body of 
the child three cinnabar-red patches, which had not arisen spontaneously 
during the act of birth, but had the appearance of the marks of fin- 
ger-nails, affording thus another proof of the correctness of our sup- 
position.'^ Accordingly we did not hesitate to declare that the 
death of the child had been caused by violence. The jury brought 



§ 121. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 161 

in a verdict of "Guilty/' and the accused was sentenced to the 
statutory many years' imprisonment in bridewell. 

Three years srfterwards, the precisely similar case (CCCLXXX.), 
already related, came before us, in which the subsequent confession 
of the accused confirmed the correctness of our opinion in regard to 
the infliction of violence. 

Case (XCXCI.— Birth into Excrement. 

An unmarried woman, who had concealed her pregnancy, as is so 
frequently done, up to the last moment, felt a desire to go to stool, 
and cowered over a wooden bucket about a foot and a-half high. 
She evacuated into it a considerable quantity of excrement and urine, 
and immediately afterwards, according to her statement, the child 
was forcibly expelled. The body, which was brought before us 
two days subsequently, was much stained with faeces. The dia- 
phragm stood comparatively low, between the fifth and sixth ribs. 
The trachea, oesophagus, and stomach, were quite empty and normal. 
Both the lungs were brownish-red, quite unmottled, were strongly 
retracted, did not crepitate on being incised, did not give vent to 
any bloody froth, and were altogether incapable of floating. In this 
case also the urinary bladder was empty and the large intestine full. 
Correctly, as I think, paying no attention to all those subtleties 
whereby Henke and his followers seek, by means of cases such as 
this to throw doubt upon the value of the docimasia pulmonaris, we 
simply declared, that the child (bom in the eighth month) had been 
bom dead, and that the results of the dissection did not show that 
any third party had been to blame for this still-birth, thus very pro- 
perly leaving it to the presiding law-oflBcial to ascertain whether 
there were any other circumstances connected with the case which 
might appear to throw blame on the mother, in regard to the pecu- 
liarities attending the birth. No further inquiries were made, and 
no report was subsequently required from us, — a proof that the case 
was allowed to drop after our summary opinion had been given. 

Case CCCXCII. — Birth into Excrement. 

The mother of this child, dLprimipara, declared that after repeated 
and long-continued tenesmus, which had several times driven her to 
the night-chair, which was filled with excrement to within nine inches 

VOL. III. M 



162 § 121. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

of the seat, she was at last delivered of child, placenta, and 
cord while sitting there. The child was found by an eye-witness of 
the scene with its head sticking in the fseces. It was mature, and 
come to the fall time. The appearances found were very decisive and 
were, human excrement in the mouth and on the tongue, and more 
than a tablespoonful of it in the stomach ; the diaphragm stood at 
the fifth rib; the lungs were dark blue, with a few bright-red patches; 
they did not reach to the pericardium, and were covered with a few 
petechial ecchymoses; they were perfectly buoyant, aU but a few 
portions, and emitted a sound of crepitation and bloody firoth on 
being incised ; the blood was very dark, the heart empty, the mucous 
membrane of the trachea (the body being quite fresh) was of a bright 
red; several bits of feeces were sticking in the larynx, more of them 
in the oesophagus; the jugular veins were turgid, the cerebral veins 
and sinuses were much congested. A remarkably distinct es^ample 
of suflFocation in excrement ! 

Case OCCXCIII. — A Newborn Child taken out of a Privy. 

This case was equally clear. The mother declared that she had 
bom the child into an empty pail, and as she thought it was bom 
dead, she flung it into the privy. This statement was not confirmed 
by the dissection. The child was a boy, bom in the eighth month, 
and its diaphragm stood between the fourth and fifth ribs. The 
stomach was '^ distended with a yellow fluid smelling of human 
faeces.'^ The vena cava was tolerably congested, the liver contained 
much blood, but yet not remarkably more than is usually the case in 
newbom children. The lungs were considerably retracted; they 
swam while entire, but when tested after being cut in pieces, the 
upper lobe of the left lung and many pieces of the right one sank. 
On making incision into the lungs an unusuaDy great quantity of 
dark bloody froth escaped with a crepitating noise. Neither larynx, 
trachea, nor tongue had any foreign substance in or upon them. 
The oesophagus was also empty. The brain was so soft from com- 
mencing putrefaction that it could not be properly examined ; there 
was, however, distinct hypersemia of the vessels of the pia mater. 
We gave it as our opinion that the child had lived a short time 
during and after its birth; that it had died from pulmonary apoplexy, 
and that its death had been caused by drowning in fluid faeces. 



§ 121. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 163 



Case CCCXCIV. — Bieth into Exgeement. 

This rmmsmei primipara had been also driven by necessity re- 
peatedly to the night-chair (in June) , till at last her long absence caused 
alarm. Her sisters found her lying senseless upon the blood-stained 
floor close to the night-chair, which was still open, quite full, and 
also spattered with blood ; its opening measured eleven inches in dia- 
meter. The child was taken out of the feeces quite dead. The 
accused, who had no reason to conceal the birth, as her seducer was 
to marry her in a few months, declared that she had, while sitting on 
the night-chair, indeed felt something pass out of her body, but did 
not know what it was, as she swooned away, and all she remem- 
bered was having attempted to stand up. The child was mature, 
and had breathed. The lungs completely filled the cavity of the 
thorax; they were perfectly buoyant, of a bluish-red mottled with 
lighter patches, and contained dark bloody froth distinctly smelling 
of human excrement, and the diaphragm stood between the fifth and 
sixth ribs. The heart contained blood only in the coronary veins. 
The trachea was injected with bright red, and both it and the bronchi 
were filled with yellowish-coloured fsecal fluid, a similar fluid was also 
found in the oesophagus. The mouth and fauces were distinctly coated 
with fluid faeces. The liver was unusually dark and full of blood; 
the stomach was three parts filled with yellowish feecal fluid, the vena 
cava was moderately turgid with dark blood. The scalp had no 
blood-coagulum on its internal surface; the cerebral membranes 
were much congested, the sinuses but moderately so. The fact that 
the child had been drowned in human excrement was indubitable. 
But we also accepted the truth of the statement that the birth had 
actually occurred upon the night-chair. The absence of any blood- 
coagulum upon the occipital aponeurosis proved that the birth had 
been precipitate ; the amount of blood upon the night-chair was also 
readily thus explained ; but it was more difficult to explain this upon 
the supposition that the child had been bom first, and then thrown 
in through an opening so wide as this was, and the difficulty was all 
the greater that no other place was found on which the birth could 
have taken place. Finally, the situation in which the accused was 
found lying senseless close to the night-chair was also in favour of 
the idea that the birth had taken place there. 

M 2 



162 § 121. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

of the seat, she was at last delivered of child, placenta, and 
cord while sitting there. The child was found by an eye-witness of 
the scene with its head sticking in the fseces. It was mature, and 
come to the fall time. The appearances found were very decisive and 
were, human excrement in the mouth and on the tongue, and more 
than a tablespoonful of it in the stomach ; the diaphragm stood at 
the fifth rib; the lungs were dark blue, with a few bright-red patches; 
they did not reach to the pericardium, and were covered with a few 
petechial ecchymoses ; they were perfectly buoyant, aU but a few 
portions, and emitted a sound of crepitation and bloody froth on 
being incised ; the blood was very dark, the heart empty, the mucous 
membrane of the trachea (the body being quite fresh) was of a bright 
red; several bits of feeces were sticking in the larynx, more of them 
in the oesophagus; the jugular veins were turgid, the cerebral veins 
and sinuses were much congested. A remarkably distinct example 
of suffocation in excrement ! 

Case OCCXCIII. — A Newbokn Child taken out of a Privy. 

This case was equally clear. The mother declared that she had 
bom the child into an empty pail, and as she thought it was bom 
dead, she flung it into the privy. This statement was not confirmed 
by the dissection. The child was a boy, bora in the eighth month, 
and its diaphragm stood between the fourth and fifth ribs. The 
stomach was '' distended with a yellow fluid smelling of human 
faeces.^^ The vena cava was tolerably congested, the liver contained 
much blood, but yet not remarkably more than is usually the case in 
newborn children. The lungs were considerably retracted; they 
swam while entire, but when tested after being cut in pieces, the 
upper lobe of the left lung and many pieces of the right one sank. 
On making incision into the lungs an unusuaDy great quantity of 
isjk bloody froth escaped with a crepitating noise. Neither larynx, 
trachea, nor tongue had any foreign substance in or upon them. 
The oesophagus was also empty. The brain was so soft from com- 
mencing putrefaction that it could not be properly examined ; there 
was, however, distinct hypersemia of the vessels of the pia mater. 
We gave it as our opinion that the child had hved a short time 
during and after its birth ; that it had died from pulmonary apoplexy, 
and that its death had been caused by drowning in fluid feces. 



§ 121. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 163 

Case CCCXCIV.— Bieth into Exceement. 

This \mm2imei primipara had been also driven by necessity re- 
peatedly to the night-chair (in June) , till at last her long absence caused 
alarm. Her sisters found her lying senseless upon the blood-stained 
floor close to the night-chair, which was still open, quite full, and 
also spattered with blood ; its opening measured eleven inches in dia- 
meter. The child was taken out of the faeces quite dead. The 
accused, who had no reason to conceal the birth, as her seducer was 
to marry her in a few months, declared that she had, while sitting on 
the night-chair, indeed felt something pass out of her body, but did 
not know what it was, as she swooned away, and all she remem- 
bered was having attempted to stand up. The child was mature, 
and had breathed. The lungs completely filled the cavity of the 
thorax ; they were perfectly buoyant, of a bluish-red mottled with 
lighter patches, and contained dark bloody froth distinctly smelling 
of human excrement, and the diaphragm stood between the fifth and 
sixth ribs. The heart contained blood only in the coronary veins. 
The trachea was injected with bright red, and both it and the bronchi 
were filled with yellowish-coloured feecal fluid, a similar fluid was also 
found in the oesophagus. The mouth and fauces were distinctly coated 
with fluid faeces. The liver was unusually dark and full of blood; 
the stomach was three parts filled with yellowish faecal fluid, the vena 
cava was moderately turgid with dark blood. The scalp had no 
blood-coagulum on its internal surface; the cerebral membranes 
were much congested, the sinuses but moderately so. The fact that 
the child had been drowned in human excrement was indubitable. 
But we also accepted the truth of the statement that the birth had 
actually occurred upon the night-chair. The absence of any blood- 
coagulum upon the occipital aponeurosis proved that the birth had 
been precipitate ; the amount of blood upon the night-chair was also 
readily thus explained ; but it was more difficult to explain this upon 
the supposition that the child had been bom first, and then thrown 
in through an opening so wide as this was, and the difficulty was all 
the greater that no other place was found on which the birth could 
have taken place. Finally, the situation in which the accused was 
found lying senseless close to the night-chair was also in favour of 
the idea that the birth had taken place there. 

M 2 



162 § 121. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

of the seat, she was at last delivered of child, placenta, and 
cord while sitting there. The child was found by an eye-witness of 
the scene with its head sticking in the fseces. It was mature, and 
come to the fall time. The appearances found were very decisive and 
were, human excrement in the mouth and on the tongue, and more 
than a tablespoonfol of it in the stomach ; the diaphragm stood at 
the fifth rib; the lungs were dark blue, with a few bright-red patches; 
they did not reach to the pericardium, and were covered with a few 
petechial ecchymoses; they were perfectly buoyant, all but a few 
portions, and emitted a sound of crepitation and bloody firoth on 
being incised ; the blood was very dark, the heart empty, the mucous 
membrane of the trachea (the body being quite fresh) was of a bright 
red; several bits of faeces were sticking in the larynx, more of them 
in the oesophagus ; the jugular veins were turgid, the cerebral veins 
and sinuses were much congested. A remarkably distinct example 
of suflFocation in excrement ! 

Case OCCXCIII. — A Newbokn Child taken out of a Privy. 

This case was equally clear. The mother declared that she had 
bom the child into an empty pail, and as she thought it was bom 
dead, she flung it into the privy. This statement was not confirmed 
by the dissection. The child was a boy, bora in the eighth month, 
and its diaphragm stood between the fourth and fifth ribs. The 
stomach was '^ distended with a yellow fluid smelling of human 
faeces.^^ The vena cava was tolerably congested, the Hver contained 
much blood, but yet not remarkably more than is usually the case in 
newborn children. The lungs were considerably retracted; they 
swam while entire, but when tested after being cut in pieces, the 
upper lobe of the left lung and many pieces of the right one sank. 
On making incision into the lungs an unusuaDy great quantity of 
dark bloody froth escaped with a crepitating noise. Neither larynx, 
trachea, nor tongue had any foreign substance in or upon them. 
The oesophagus was also empty. The brain was so soft from com- 
mencing putrefaction that it could not be properly examined ; there 
was, however, distinct hyperaemia of the vessels of the pia mater. 
We gave it as our opinion that the child had lived a short time 
during and after its birth; that it had died from pulmonary apoplexy, 
and that its death had been caused by drowning in fluid faeces. 



5 121. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 163 

Case CCCXCIV.— Bikth into Excebment. 

This \mmaxneA primipara had been also driven by necessity re- 
peatedly to the night-chair (in June) , till at last her long absence caused 
alarm. Her sisters found her lying senseless upon the blood-stained 
floor close to the night-chair, which was still open, quite full, and 
also spattered with blood; its opening measured eleven inches in dia- 
meter. The child was taken out of the fseces quite dead. The 
accused, who had no reason to conceal the birth, as her seducer was 
to marry her in a few months, declared that she had, while sitting on 
the night-chair, indeed felt something pass out of her body, but did 
not know what it was, as she swooned away, and all she remem- 
bered was having attempted to stand up. The child was mature, 
and had breathed. The lungs completely filled the cavity of the 
thorax; they were perfectly buoyant, of a bluish-red mottled with 
lighter patches, and contained dark bloody froth distinctly smelling 
of human excrement, and the diaphragm stood between the fifth and 
sixth ribs. The heart contained blood only in the coronary veins. 
The trachea was injected with bright red, and both it and the bronchi 
were filled with yellowish-coloured faecal fluid, a similar fluid was also 
found in the oesophagus. The mouth and fauces were distinctly coated 
with fluid faeces. Tte liver was unusually dark and full of blood; 
the stomach was three parts filled with yellowish faecal fluid, the vena 
cava was moderately turgid with dark blood. The scalp had no 
blood-coagulum on its internal surface; the cerebral membranes 
were much congested, the sinuses but moderately so. The fact that 
the child had been drowned in human excrement was indubitable. 
But we also accepted the truth of the statement that the birth had 
actually occurred upon the night-chair. The absence of any blood- 
coagulum upon the occipital aponeurosis proved that the birth had 
been precipitate ; the amount of blood upon the night-chair was also 
readily thus explained ; but it was more difllcult to explain this upon 
the supposition that the child had been bom flrst, and then thrown 
in through an opening so wide as this was, and the diflBculty was all 
the greater that no other place was found on which the birth could 
have taken place. Finally, the situation in which the accused was 
found lying senseless close to the night-chair was also in favour of 
the idea that the birth had taken place there. 

M 2 



162 § 121. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

of the seat, she was at last delivered of child, placenta, and 
cord while sitting there. The child was found by an eye-witness of 
the scene with its head sticking in the fseces. It was mature, and 
come to the full time. The appearances found were very decisive and 
were, human excrement in the mouth and on the tongue, and more 
than a tablespoonful of it in the stomach ; the diaphragm stood at 
the fifth rib; the lungs were dark blue, with a few bright-red patches; 
they did not reach to the pericardium, and were covered with a few 
petechial ecchymoses; they were perfectly buoyant, all but a few 
portions, and emitted a sound of crepitation and bloody froth on 
being incised ; the blood was very dark, the heart empty, the mucous 
membrane of the trachea (the body being quite fresh) was of a bright 
red; several bits of faeces were sticking in the larynx, more of them 
in the oesophagus ; the jugular veins were turgid, the cerebral veins 
and sinuses were much congested. A remarkably distinct eiample 
of suffocation in excrement ! 

Case CCCXCIII. — A Newborn Child taken out of a Privy. 

This case was equally clear. The mother declared that she had 
bom the child into an empty pail, and as she thought it was bom 
dead, she flung it into the privy. This statement was not confirmed 
by the dissection. The child was a boy, bora in the eighth month, 
and its diaphragm stood between the fourth and fifth ribs. The 
stomach was ^^ distended with a yellow fluid smelling of human 
faeces.'^ The vena cava was tolerably congested, the liver contained 
much blood, but yet not remarkably more than is usually the case in 
newborn children. The lungs were considerably retracted; they 
swam while entire, but when tested after being cut in pieces, the 
upper lobe of the left lung and many pieces of the right one sank. 
On making incision into the lungs an unusually great quantity of 
darit bloody froth escaped with a crepitating noise. Neither larynx, 
trachea, nor tongue had any foreign substance in or upon them. 
The oesophagus was also empty. The brain was so soft from com- 
mencing putrefaction that it could not be properly examined ; there 
was, however, distinct hypersemia of the vessels of the pia mater. 
We gave it as our opinion that the child had lived a short time 
during and after its birth ; that it had died from pulmonary apoplexy, 
and that its death had been caused by drowning in fluid faeces. 



5 121. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 163 



Case CXXJXCIV.— Bikth into Excebment. 

This \mmameA jmmipara had been also driven by necessity re- 
peatedly to the mght-chair (in June) , till at last her long absence caused 
alarm. Her sisters found her lying senseless upon the blood-stained 
floor close to the night-chair, which was still open, quite full, and 
also spattered with blood ; its opening measured eleven inches in dia- 
meter. The child was taken out of the faeces quite dead. The 
accused, who had no reason to conceal the birth, as her seducer was 
to marry her in a few months, declared that she had, while sitting on 
the night-chair, indeed felt something pass out of her body, but did 
not know what it was, as she swooned away, and all she remem- 
bered was having attempted to stand up. The child was mature, 
and had breathed. The lungs completely filled the cavity of the 
thorax ; they were perfectly buoyant, of a bluish-red mottled with 
lighter patches, and contaiued dark bloody froth distinctly smeUing 
of human excrement, and the diaphragm stood between the fifth and 
sixth ribs. The heart contained blood only in the coronary veins. 
The trachea was injected with bright red, and both it and the bronchi 
were filled with yellowish-coloured fsecal fluid, a similar fluid was also 
found in the oesophagus. The mouth and fauces were distinctly coated 
with fluid faeces. The liver was unusually dark and full of blood ; 
the stomach was three parts filled with yellowish faecal fluid, the vena 
cava was moderately turgid with dark blood. The scalp had no 
blood-coagulum on its internal surface; the cerebral membranes 
were much congested, the sinuses but moderately so. The fact that 
the child had been drowned in himian excrement was indubitable. 
But we also accepted the truth of the statement that the birth had 
actually occurred upon the night-chair. The absence of any blood- 
coagulum upon the occipital aponeurosis proved that the birth had 
been precipitate ; the amount of blood upon the night-chair was also 
readily thus explained ; but it was more difllcult to explain this upon 
the supposition that the child had been bom flrst, and then thrown 
in through an opening so wide as this was, and the diflBculty was all 
the greater that no other place was found on which the birth could 
have taken place. Knally, the situation in which the accused was 
found lying senseless close to the night-chair was also in favour of 
the idea that the birth had taken place there. 

M 2 



164 § 121. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

Case CCCXCV. — ^Birth into Exceement. — Death from Suffo- 
cation. — Sinking of the Lungs. — Intentional Infanticide ? 

This case was the most instructive of all those many similar ones 
which constantly come before us in regard to the value of the doci- 
masia pulmonaris, and deserves to be detailed at length. This un- 
married j^nrnjoam had also the usual story to tell; she was not ex- 
pecting her confinement, and feeling a desire to go to stool, had been 
suddenly delivered of her child, whereupon she had become senseless, 
&c. lie police report, however, supposed that she had flung the 
child into the privy after its birth, since the umbilical cord was cut 
and the placenta wanting ; the man who had the charge of emptying 
the cesspool at night having found the child in doing this, but not 
the placenta. The child was a mature girl (twenty and a-quarter 
inches long, seven pounds heavy, &c.), with the usual cranial and 
shoulder diameters (three, four and a-quarter, five, and four and 
three-quarters inches) ; in the mouth, fauces, and nostrils there was 
a considerable quantity of human ordure. The diaphragm stood be- 
tween the fifth and sixth ribs ; the stomach was quite filled with 
fluid human fseces. The vena cava was tolerably well-filled with 
dark and not unusually fluid blood. Nothing else was found in the 
abdomen of any importance. The thymus gland was very large, and 
almost entirely covered the pericardium. With the heart the lungs 
sank at once in the water ; without the heart they sank more slowly. 
Their colour was precisely that of the spleen, the middle lobe of the 
right lung, however, exhibited a few lentil-sized brighter patches ; 
the edges of both lungs were also somewhat brighter in colour. Pete- 
chial eccyhmoses were scattered over several parts of the lungs. Each 
lung, as well as each lobe, sank in water, but the middle lobe of the 
right lung very slowly. No portion, however, of the lung, even when 
it was cut into many pieces, showed itself buoyant. On making these 
incisions no crepitation was heard, yet in isolated spots of both lungs 
a very little bloody froth could be squeezed out, and from such spots 
when squeezed under water fine air-bubbles ascended. The lungs 
themselves contained much blood. The mucous membrane of the 
trachea was of a bright rosy red, and was seen with the aid of a mag- 
nifying-glass to be minutely injected. The oesophagus was empty. 
In each side of the heart there was about a drachm (imp.) of dark 
fluid blood. The bones of the cranium were uninjured ; the veins of 



§ 121. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 165 

the pia mater were very full, those of plexus choroidalis unusually 
so, as were also those of the cerebellum and the sinuses. In the 
written opinion which we gave we first proved the maturity of the 
child and its viability. "It had, however, lived and breathed, 
though only for an uncommonly short time, although this opinion 
seems to be but little supported by the results of the docimasia pulmo- 
naris. The lungs sank, both when entire and when cut in pieces, com- 
pletely under water ; their colour, like that of the lungs of a deadbom 
child, was lite the spleen, and no crepitation was perceived while 
making many incisions. But on the other hand the docimasia pul- 
monaris, which in this very remarkable case was instituted with quite 
peculiar care, has still afforded proof that the lungs contained some 
air, though only in trifling quantily, and consequently the result of 
but one, two, or three inspirations, since there is no other probable 
source for the air in this case. This proof consists in the position of 
the diaphragm between the fifth and sixth ribs, the brighter patches 
in the lungs, though they were but trifling in amoun*^^; the bloody 
froth and the fine air-bubbles which ascended from the cut portions of 
the lung when squeezed under water. This case, therefore, like many 
similar ones, proves the great delicacy and excellence of the doginuma 
jpulmona/ris, which has here detected a respiratory Ufe that has been 
ended almost as soon as began. The kind of death already assumed in 
our summary opinion as that which had proved fatal to the child, suffo- 
cation,is in complete agreement with the ideaof thepre-existence of life, 
and completes the proof of its existence. In regard to this, we put little 
value on the fact that the tongue lay between the jaws, because this is 
also found after other kinds of death, nor upon the small effusions of 
blood beneath the pleura, because these, though significative of death 
by suffocation in newborn children, are also found in liiose born dead. 
The minute vascular injection of the trachea, the great amount 
of blood in the lungs, and the considerable congestion within 
the cranium are, however, important appearances, and pecuhar to 
death from suffocation. The child must thus have fallen into the 
fluid faeces alive, and must of course have been drowned therein, and 
death from drowning is, in a large proportion of cases, death from 
suffocation.'^ We were at once asked whether the objective facts of 
the case gave any reason to suppose that the death of the child had 
been intentional? In regard to this the statement of the accused as 
to the circumstances attending the birth was first examined, 
and it was shown from general experience, which was in this case 



166 § 121. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

supported by all the peculiarities of the case, that this was perfectly 
trustworthy. " The supposition of the police/' we went on to say, 
'' that the woman J. has thrown the foetus into the privy is untenable. 
This supposition presupposes that the child has been bom elsewhere 
than on the night-chair, and that it was carried thither; In this 
case, however, the results of the docimasia pulmonaris would have 
been quite different, and would have shown not merely the presence 
of the short life of a few inspirations proved to have existed, but that 
of the longer life which must have been necessary under the altered 
circumstances. The child must, therefore, have been bom upon the 
seat of the privy, and it must have fallen at once into the faeces, and 
been therein drowned. When the police report asserts that the um- 
bilical cord appears to have been cut, this is not supported by the 
appearances found by us at the dissection, for the serrated, unequal 
edges of the cord point decidedly rather to its having been torn than 
cut, and the former was likely to happen from the rapidity of the birth, 
as it often does. Finally, in regard to the disappearance of the after- 
birth, which is certainly remarkable, this must have been expelled and 
passed unnoticed by the man in emptying the bucket ; and we may 
remark, that in precipitate birth the placenta is very frequently ex- 
pelled either along with the child or immediately thereafter, and that 
this has all the more likely been the case here, inasmuch as, on exa- 
mining the bed in which the woman lay down after the birth, not 
only was no placenta found, but not even much blood. For these 
reasons, and in itself also, the statement of the nightman deserves no 
credit, since even a man who possessed a more correct knowledge of 
what a placenta is — while this nightman, from answers to queries put 
to him in our presence, showed he knew nothing about it, — might be 
easily deceived when emptying a bucket filled with solid and fluid 
faeces, fee, during the night.'' Accordingly we gave a negative answer 
to the judicial query in regard to the existence of proof of the death 
of the child having been intentional, and the accused was at once 
liberated. 

Case CCCXCVI. — A Child takett out of a Cesspool. — ^The 
Mother's Guilt unasceetainable. 

On the 9th of March, a man just about to sit down on a privy, 
heard the cry of a child from beneath, and found the opening be- 
spattered all round with recent blood-stains, which could also be 



§ 121. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 167 

traced through the court to the cellar, where an unmarried woman, 
K., dwelt. The master of the house, who was called by the witness 
last-mentioned to assist in rescuing the child, deposed that the child 
was taken out of the cesspool alive and apparently healthy ; that the 
privy had been cleaned out just the day before, and that the child had 
lain upon its back upon a soft and not fluid substance, so that it 
could not be drowned. Another witness stated, that the mass on 
which the child lay consisted of " straw and faeces mixed, firm and 
not fluid/' and that the child was ^'covered with blood.'' The wo- 
man, K., who was at once discovered to be the mother, deposed, that 
believing her time to be not yet near, she was in so far surprised by 
the birth, as that having been seized with a strong desire to "pass 
both urine and fseces, while sitting on the privy the child was sud- 
denly expelled," the umbilical cord was torn and the child fell into 
the privy. On examination, the opening in the seat of the privy 
was found to be ten inches in diameter, and was certainly large 
enough for a child to shoot through it. The child died in the 
Charity Hospital two days after birth, but we were not made ac- 
quainted with any particulars of its illness. At the medico-legal 
dissection it was found to be a mature male child, and it was by 
no means unimportant to find that the head was somewhat smaller 
than usual, inasmuch as its longitudinal diameter was only four 
inches, its transverse only three, and its diagonal only four inches and 
a-half. There were no traces of violence found upon the body. The 
cause of death had indubitably been apoplectic hypersemia. In regard 
to the origin of this fatal apoplexy we thus expressed ourselves in rela- 
tion to a query put to us by the public prosecutor : — " No connec- 
tion between the cause of this child's death and the circumstances 
attendant on its birth, can be proved to exist either from the appear- 
ances found on the body or from the documentary evidence. For 
if the fact of the child's having fallen or been thrown into the privy 
had been either the direct or influential cause of its death, which 
was not impossible, considering the coldness of the day of its birth, 
then we would have expected to find — 1. Some external trace of this 
fall, particularly on the head of the child; nothing of the kind was 
found. But in regard to this, we may remark, that the child fell 
tolerably soft. And 2, and chiefly, the child in such a case would have 
died at once from rapidly fatal apoplexy, and not, as actually hap- 
pened, two days afterwards, having been all that time under medical 
care." In regard to the statement of the mother as to the circum- 



168 § 121. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

stances of the birth, we must of course declare, as requires no further 
elucidation here, that the whole of it was, in accordance with medical 
experience, to be regarded as perfectly trustworthy ; and this all the 
more, that the woman, K., was a muUijparay and the head of the child 
was smaller than usual. (We did not examine the maternal pelvis). 
There were also no medical reasons for supposing that the child had 
not fallen into the privy at its birth, but had been subsequently thrown 
into it. Accordingly, in regard to the query put to us, the tenor of 
our opinion was as follows : — 1. That the child in question was ma- 
ture and viable; 2. That it had died of apoplexy; 3. That the 
results of the dissection did not reveal any external violence as the 
cause of this fatal disease ; 4. That no connection could be proved 
to exist between the death of the child and the circumstances atten- 
dant on its birth ; 5. That the fact of the child having fallen or been 
thrown into the privy could not be regarded as the cause of its 
death; 6. That the statement of the woman, K., in regard to the 
circumstances of the birth, in itself, and in accordance with the other 
evidence given, as well as in regard to the locality of the privy, and 
the position and condition in which the child was found, is probable, 
and, 7. That there is no reason to suppose that the child had not fal- 
len into the privy at its birth, but had been thrown in subsequently. 
No further proceedings were taken against the woman, K., for sup- 
posed infanticide. 

Case CCCXCVII. — A Child taken out op the Water. — The 
Body thus disposed op for economical reasons. 

This mature, viable, newborn child, was taten out of one of the small 
lakes in the Thiergarten,* and had actually been born dead, as was 
indubitably proved by the docimasia pulmonaris. The child conse- 
quently was dead when flung into the water, but appeared, when 
externally inspected, just like the body of any other drowned child. 
Since, whilst the abdomen and genital organs were still of the usual 
corpse colour, the head was abeady grey, and the breast green from 
putrefaction. It was interesting, however, and assisted in clearing 
up the case, to find that the umbilical cord had been tied with a 
hempen ligature (pack-thread). Who had applied this ligature? 
The mother (who was and is quite unknown) when she had secretly 
given birth to her illegitimate child ? And for what purpose had she 
♦ Public park at Berlin. 



§ 121. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 169 

done this ? Or perhaps some one assisting at the confinement, a mid- 
wife or possibly only a monthly nurse ? But neither of these, not to 
speak of a physician, would have used such a thread as a ligature. 
Probably therefore the child was not bom secretly, but before several 
witnesses; probably also, it was quickly and easily brought forth, and 
some silly old woman present thought that she must tie the umbilical 
cord. And after they were convinced that the child was dead, it was 
in the highest degree probable that to save all further trouble, par- 
ticularly the police notice and the burial expenses, it was carried 
outside of the gate and flung into the water. 

Case CCCXCVIII. — Body op a Newborn Child with its Skull- 
cap SAWN OFF, TAKEN OUT OP THE WaTER. — ThB BoDY THUS 
DISPOSED OF FOR ECONOMICAL REASONS. 

The economical reasons were in this quite indubitable, and the case 
itself was too peculiar to be omitted here. It possesses indeed not 
the slightest interest in a diagnostic point of view. It was a mature 
male child that was taken out of the water, and was already (in 
October) so highly putrefied that it could only be inspected exter- 
nally. But it was thereby discovered that the calvarium had been 
scientifically sawn off, and the scalp again stitched up in like manner. 
On opening it again, the cranium was found quite empty. Evidently 
therefore the child had been dissected by a private physician to 
determine the diagnosis, and had subsequently been thrown into the 
water by its relatives, instead of being buried. 

Case CCCXCIX. — A Newborn Child taken out of a Chimney. — 
The Body thus disposed of for economical reasons. 

This case is in so far interesting, that our opinion was subsequently 
entirely confirmed by the confession of the mother. The docimasia 
pulmonaris proved indubitably that life had existed subsequent to 
its birth ;* the only cause of death to be discovered in the body 
was cerebral apoplexy, which had arisen from internal causes. In 
regard to the place where the body of the child, rolled in rags and 
linen, was found, an unheated chimney (in April), we stated, that the 
child had been placed there after death, and most probably only to 
get rid of it more cheaply than by burial. The mother was ascertained 
• The lungs of this child are represented Plate VI. Fig. 16. 



170 § 121. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

to be a Russian maid-servant, travelling with a family. She con- 
fessed qnite openly that she had secretly given birth to the child, 
which had only lived a short time; that, being strange and unac- 
quainted with the customs of the country, and too poor to provide a 
more suitable burial for the body, she had concealed it in the chim- 
ney, her family being just about to depart. 

Case COOC. — Coiung op the Funis round the Child's Neck. — 
Apoplexy. — Self-dbmvbey. 

A mature male child was brought before us (in January) quite 
fresh, and with the quite fresh umbilical cord, which was thi/rty-three 
inches long, coiled round its neck, the funis was not tied, and its 
edges were serrated and unevep (torn). The mother was never dis- 
covered. The body was seven pounds and three-quarters in weight, 
and twenty inches and a-half in length. Its cranial diameters were 
rather large, and were respectively, three inches and a-half, four 
inches and a-half, and five inches and a-half, the diameter of the 
shoulders was also five inches and a-half. There was no trace of 
injury on the head. There was no proper mark of strangulation 
round the neck, only on its nape there was a whitish stripe two 
inches long and three lines broad, not depressed, unecchymosed, and 
soft to cut. On the right side of the neck there were close to one 
another six excoriated patches, each the size of a pea, bright-red, and 
soft to cut, evidently the marks of finger-nails ; at the angle of the 
left lower jaw there was a blue and actually ecchymosed patch the 
size of a sixpence, and on the left cheek another small excoriation 
like those described. There was nothing remarkable in the abdo- 
men ; the urinary bladder was empty, the large intestine, however, 
was full, and the anus bespattered with meconium. The right lung 
was of a uniform liver-brown, wholly retracted, and it sank com- 
pletely in water, even to its smallest portion. The left lung on the 
other hand, almost covered the pericardium, was of a bright rosy-red, 
mottled with blue, and gave vent to crepitation and bloody- froth on 
being incised, which was not the case with the right lung ; it also 
floated perfectly. Within the cranium there was not only a very 
evident cerebri hyperaemia, but there was also the remarkable phe- 
nomenon of an extravasation of dark treacly-blood upon the basis ■ 
cranii. There was no evidence of any other, particularly external 
or violent, cause of this apoplexy than this coiling of the funis 



§ 121. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 171 

and none other was required. From the great development of the 
child the birth might well be supposed to have been somewhat 
tedious^ and it seemed justifiable to assume^ that the external in- 
juries upon the neck and face already described, were the result of the 
parturient woman's own eflforts at self-delivery.* 

♦ Vide also oases belonging to this category, detailed under the numerals 
CLYIII., CCXXXI., CCXXXIIL-CCXXXIY., CCLXXYIII., CCLXXIX., 
CCC, CCCIX., CCCX., CCCXXL, CCCXXII., and CCCXXIY., all in 
Yol. II. 



CASPER 



rOEENSIO MEDICINE. 



BIOLOGICAL DIVISION. 



GENEKAL DIVISION. 



INTEODUCTION* 

§ 1. Natuee op the Science. 

FoaBNSic Medicine is the science of sagacity, as well as of the 
combination of particular facts for particular ends. The facts are 
natural objects, the ends are those of justice as laid down in the civil 
and criminal codes. The greater the obscurity of the facts, as is so 
often the case, and the more important it is to discover the truth 
and clear up what is obscure, in order to destroy the injurious effect 
always produced on public morals by undiscovered crime, so much 
the more is the exponent of this science required to possess, besides 
the requisite scientific knowledge, an amount of subtle sagacity 
sufficient to prevent him in one case from being led astray by de- 
ceptive accessory circumstances, and in another, to enable him to 
seize the kernel amid the multiplicity of details in which it lies hid, 
at one time to distinguish the reality of nature from its deceptive 
resemblance, and another to draw important conclusions from mere 
traces where the usual results of an examination are almost entirely 
absent. Forensic medicine, therefore, teaches how to discovee and 

PKEPABE MEDICAL AND OTHEB FACTS OF NATURAL SCIENCE FOR THE 

ENDS OF LAW AND JUSTICE. It has Consequently a perfectly different 
tendency and reference from all other medical teaching. It has, how- 
ever, also its own peculiar, specific, scientific doctrines. Such as the 
doctrine of the forms of violent death, of abuse and aberration in regard 
to sexual propensity, of the simulation of bodily and mental disease, of 
doubtful Uve-birth in a child, &c., which belong to forensic medicine 
alone of all the various branches of medical science. It is, therefore, 
a science of itself, and its cultivators have often rightly enough 

* The Biological Division, though later published in the first (German) 
edition than the Thanatological Division, is really the first volume of this 
work. All the generalities are therefore following here, instead of beginning 
the work, as is the case in the later editions — Note hy Jtfthor. 



176 §2. INSTRUCTION IN FORENSIC MEDICINE. 

asserted that those who deny to forensic medicme the character of 
a specific science, can only do so from ignorance. However/ just 
because it is a science of itself, forensic medicine must exclude every- 
thing that does not belong to its own peculiar department, including 
much that has been both long and generally imposed upon it. As 
has been already remarked in the Preface (Vol. I.), these burdens 
erroneously imposed upon it have been of two kinds. In the 
first place, pure preliminary knowledge, and in the second place, 
judicial theories, controversies, definitions, and subtleties have been 
inwoven with the teaching peculiar to forensic medicine, though they 
are wholly foreign to the subject, for though forensic medicine in- 
vestigates and labours for judicial ends, and mediately for judicial 
science, it is not itself the science of law. 

§ 2. Instruction in Forensic Medicine. 

It is very properly almost universally acknowledged, that profitable 
instruction in forensic medicine — ^which is entirely a practical science, 
based upon actual life, and which wanders into by-paths and error 
directly it leaves this basis and goes off into the region of pure 
speculation, that profitable instruction in forensic medicine, there- 
fore, I say — can only be obtained where the teacher possesses a fund 
of practical material to draw upon. In other words, the public 
teacher of forensic medicine must either be, or have been a practical 
forensic physician, just as certainly as the clinical teacher must be or 
have been a practical physician. Governments in recent times have 
been more and more impressed with the correctness of this view, and 
have taken the proper method of bringing this about by combining 
in one person the offices of public lecturer on forensic medicine and 
practical forensic physician. In Berlin this has been the case for 
more than thirty years, but also other Prussian universities, as well 
as a few of those of Austria, Bavaria, Russia, and Sweden enjoy this 
privilege, and are therefore in a position which enables them to train 
up truly useful and really scientifically educated medical jurists. And 
in time even sacrifices must be made in order to render this arrange- 
ment general; for instance, by the removal of courts of law, prisons, 
&c., in order to take away from diligent and effective teachers the 
embarrassment imposed on them, which no one can be more painfully 
conscious of than themselves, of teaching a department in which they 
can never feel at home themselves for want of the firm basis obtained 



§ 2. INSTRUCTION IN FORENSIC MEDICINE. 177 

by the observation of nature. The very nature of the subject itself 
certainly prevents such a mass of material for medico-legal instruc- 
tion as only large towns like Berlin, Vienna, Prague, Munich, St. 
Petersburg, &c., can afford, from being everywhere obtainable ; but 
even if the teacher could every year exhibit to his scholars only a 
few cases of doubtful mental disease, of death by drowning, of the 
docimasia pulmonaris, &c., or increase their knowledge of the relation 
of the forensic physician to the judicial boards, by coming before 
these at only a few public trials — and by proper arrangements of the 
State, |ill this might be attained even in the smaller university towns 
— ^then the benefit both to teacher and taught, both to science and 
practice, would ere long become evident. Even young lawyers would 
take a part in such a practical tuition of our science with interest, 
and would thereby obtain actual instruction, because the objects of in- 
vestigation brought before them, and the lectures and opinions founded 
on these, plainly show that the matters treated of are very closely con- 
nected with the duties of their future position. I may also here 
state that my own pleasing experience has taught me that no pecu- 
liar talent is requisite to enable one to give to young lawyers a 
general knowledge of medico-legal matters. 



VOL. III. N 



CHAPTEfi I. 

THE FORENSIC MEDICAL OFFICIALS. 

Statutoey Eegulations. 

On the position of the District Physician in Prussia, vide v. Konne 
and Simon: das Medicinal-TTesm desPreussiscken Staates, Breslau, 
1844, I., s. 118, &c.; Supplemenlband, 1852, s. 6, &c.; Supple- 
menthandy 1856, s. 4, &c. ; On the position of the District Surgeon, 
ibidem, I., s. 261, &c. ; Suppletnentband, s. 10, &c. ; On the position 
of the Midwife, ibidem, I., s. 563, &c., Supplementband, s. 18, &c. 
2. Supplemeniband, s. 14, &c. ; vide also W. Horn, das Preus- 
sische Medicinal'Wesen, Berlin, 1857, Bd. I., ss. 42, 44, 47. 

§ 3. Germany and other Countries. 

It is not every country that has the privilege, enjoyed by most of 
the German States, of possessing a body of medical men expressly ap- 
pointed and bound by oath to carry out the due performance of all 
medico-legal (and sanitary police) duties. Even in such highly civi- 
lized lands as England and France, and also in Italy, &c., the greatest 
arbitrariness is exercised in this respect by the law courts. In any 
given civil or criminal case in which the Judge requires such enlight- 
enment as can only be given him by a medical man, he selects ac- 
cording to his own will and judgment one, two, six or more medical 
men, either in the neighbourhood or from a distance, and to these he 
deputes the task of making an examination and giving in a report. 
At one time, personal confidence leads him to select his own private 
medical attendant, at another, the fame of some generally esteemed 
medical practitioner guides his choice, quite regardless whether the 
famous physician or surgeon knows any tliig of death from drowning, 
of the docimasia pulmonaris, or of the statute-book itself, &c., to say 
nothing of his having been engaged or not in these matters. Devergie, 
from his own Parisian experience, has described the inefficiency of this 
method in such lively colours that no one can mistake it. To com- 
pensate this in some degree, this practice has been in Paris, and in 
many other places, so far modified as that each court of law appoints 



§ 3. THE MEDICAL OFFICIALS. 179 

once for all a certaiu definite number of. medical men, from among 
whom the required experts are each time selected, so that in time 
these medical men may acquire the necessary experience and practice 
in medico-legal matters, and also that amount of interest requisite to 
make them acquainted with the science of forensic medicine and with 
its progress. But even this is all arbitrary, and each new president 
of the court may introduce any new regulations in this matter that he 
pleases. It is fortunately different in Germany, in it the medico- 
forensic arrangements are such as to afford all necessary security both 
to the Judge and also to the parties concerned in any civil or criminal 
suit; for especially in criminal processes the medical authorities first 
called are legally only those whom the State has assigned to the judicial 
courts after previously ascertaining their knowledge in this depart- 
ment, while there is also an organised series of courts of professional ex- 
perts, to whose judgment the opinion given by the medical men first 
employed may be referred. It is well known that the chief of this 
staff of professional experts is the physician (district or town physi- 
cian, forensic physician, provincial forensic physician, &c.) ; while 
the statutory regulations in Prussia and other countries require this 
physician to be scientifically educated (properly Hcensed) and skilled 
in all the three chief branches of medical science, medicine, surgery, 
and obstetrics. And he must also have proved his special know- 
ledge in the department of public hygiene by a preliminary exami- 
nation, which in Prussia is undergone before the superior medical 
Board. Legal knowledge on the one hand is very properly not now 
required from him, either by the State or by any of the Boards with 
which he may have official intercourse ; and it shows a total mis- 
understanding of the position of the scientific (that is, medico-sciejiii&c) 
witness that so many medico-l^al authors have asserted the con- 
trary. But, on the other hand, it is perfectly indispensable that the 
practical medical jurist should possess a knowledge of such portions 
of the statutes as have reference to his own department, because he 
will constantly be required to give an interpretation of them from his 
point of view, and, as experieuce teaches, this knowledge will always 
(and rightly) be supposed to be possessed by him by the Judge, 
who very often, therefore, is contented in certain cases which may 
come before him to ask his opinion " in regard to § X.^' of the 
Statute Book. 

The position of the medical jurist is perfectly different now from 
^hat it fpr^ierly was. Science now requires of him much higher 

n2 



180 § 3. THE MEDICAL OFFICIALS. 

qualifications and more careful investigations, while the public and 
oral method of conducting trials no longer permits him, even in the 
most doubtful and difficult cases, to retire to his quiet study and 
take counsel with the most esteemed authors, before delivering his 
opinion, but demands that he shall have his knowledge always ready 
and at hand, and that he shall possess the talent of delivering his 
opinion and his reasons orally in a clear and convincing manner. 
For all these requirements, and the (particularly in medical police) 
many important duties of a state physician in Germany, the rights 
and benefits (salary, &c.) offered, are so disproportionately small that 
every one must hesitate before offering himself as a candidate for 
such a position ; especially as to these drawbacks, he must add the 
possibility that if he be true to his office, his oath, and his conscience 
as a fearless man of honour, he may not always be able to count 
upon real friends either amongst the public or his colleagues.* 

Besides the physician, we have in Prussia and in most German 
countries, the district (official) surgeon; the subordinate assistant 
of the former in those cases (as dissections) to which they are 
both summoned; in all other cases which may be intrusted to 
him by the Judge or the police, he is independent. The idea that a 
medico-legal physician must be associated with a medico-legal sur- 
geon in order that the district (official) medical board may be pro- 
perly organised, dates from the period when medicine became separated 
from surgery. Since the three branches of practical medicine have 
now been reunited in one, which is represented by the scientifically- 
trained physician, this separation is no longer tenable, and as has 
already happened in other German countries, so also in Prussia, we 
have, luckily, commenced to intrust the situation of " district sur- 
geon,'* or rather of assistant-physician, to actual young physicians. 

Since the introduction of the present mode of conducting triab, 
however, the official medical jurists no longer possess the monopoly 
of medico-legal business. Even previous to this, the statutory r^ula- 
tions in Prussia in r^ard to civil cases, particularly in regard to 
investigations as to idiocy or insanity, by no means exclusively re- 
quired that the official forensic physician should be consulted {Fide 
Special Division, § 65), but gave full permission for the consultation 
of any other properly licensed physician. The present mode of con- 
ducting trials permits this, however, even in criminal cases, from the 

* In regard to the relation of the medical jurist to the Judge, and parti- 
oularly to the jury, vide § 17. 



§ 3. THE MEDICAL OFFICIALS. 181 

most trifling case that comes before the college of three Judges, up to 
the most heinous oflPence that comes before the jury court. On the 
part of the court, the public prosecutor, or the advocate for the 
defence, private physicians are daily called before the court to give 
their opinion either along with the official physician or to his com- 
plete exclusion ; thus we see a continual approximation to the cus- 
tomary procedure in neighbouring countries, which, for the reasons 
abeady stated, we cannot regard as likely to be generally beneficial. 
A man may be a highly-respected and well-educated physician, as 
well as a skilful and experienced practitioner, without possessing any 
knowledge of the law, or any acquaintance with the prescribed legal 
forms, or any of the necessary experience in medico-legal matters. 
Nevertheless this new method prevails universally throughout the 
whole of Germany, and not even a private physician can any longer 
for his own sake avoid making himself acquainted with the science 
of forensic medicine, which has now ceased to be what it formerly 
was, the somewhat shunned and avoided domain of a few adepts. 

What is now the case in regard to every physician, has always 
been so in Prussia, and, as far as I know, in other German countries, 
in regard to the apothecaries as scientific witnesses. There is not, 
indeed, in Prussia one single statutory regulation which compels a 
licensed apothecary to undertake any investigation and report, belong- 
ing to his department intrusted to him by the Judge ; but practi- 
cally no harm has resulted. The Judge very properly presupposes 
that every apothecary licensed by the State possesses the requisite 
chemical, botanical, &c., knowledge, and maintains such constant 
acquaintance with the progress of these sciences, that he is in a posi- 
tion to give a scientific opinion in any matter requiring investigation 
that belongs to his department, and he nominates him for this pur- 
pose either alone, or, according to circumstances, in conjunction with 
the forensic physician. In all the larger courts, where business 
accumulates, it is the general and extremely judicious custom to 
appoint once for all a sworn apothecary, or, as in Berlin, a profes- 
sional chemist, to whom all such investigations are exclusively com- 
mitted, whose interest in maintaining a proper acquaintance with 
the advancements of science is thus increased by the desire to main- 
tain his reputation. 

The midwives are in precisely the same position as the apothe- 
caries. It is pleasant to be able to state, however, that since the 
courts of law have ascertained that every scientifically educated 



182 § 4. RELATION OF THE PHYSICIAN TO THE JUDGE. 

physician is also acquainted with obstetrics, the medico-legal re- 
quirements of the midwives have been in recent times chiefly 
restricted to such expressions of opinion, as may be occasioned by 
the circumstances of any case in which they may happen to have 
been engaged in their private practice. 

I have already detailed (§ 54, p. 233, Yol. I.), the sequence of 
the professional courts as they exist in Prussia, and their mode of 
action. A precisely similar sequence of professional courts exists, 
as already stated, throughout the whole of Germany, whether the 
superior revising courts be constituted by the medical faculty of the 
university of the State, or by various colleges with different names 
and official powers. 



§4. Relation of the Porensic Physician to the Judge. 
Statutory Eegulations. 

Rescript of the Minister of Justice of the \%th Octobefy 1811 
{in answer to an inquiry made hy the Berlin court of law). Though 
the official physician of this tovm is hound to obey without opposition 
any requisition made to him on the part of the court of law, or of any 
of its members in respect of the performance of any medico-legal ex- 
amination or inspection , if he fulfil this his official duty, or if he be 
prevented from doing so by any wellfounded reason, there is no 
occasion for laying down the rule sought to be established in the re- 
port dated the 10th of this month, that he should be made subject to 
the College of Justice. This subordinate relation, therefore, 
does not exist. 

I take up this question only because it is one treated of by all 
teachers and authors, who have advanced the most various opinions 
upon it, though it is really one of those questions which has no actual 
existence. Every practical medical jurist will scarcely be able to re- 
frain from laughing when he sees the amount of trouble expended by 
theoretical handbooks, periodical treatises, &c., in attempting to 
estimate the exact relation subsisting between the forensic physician 
and the Judge or College of Justice, and to define the limits of his 
position. In former times views prevailed in accordance with which 
the position of the forensic physician was held to be a subordinate one; 
subsequently he was elevated to the same level ; and in recent times 
he has even been raised to the rank of an ^^ Assessor " to the Judge ! 



§ 4. RELATION OF THE PHYSICIAN TO THE JUDGE. 183 

These tiresome discussions belong entirely to the number of those 
which have been written into forensic medicine, and are quite worth- 
less in practice, for every forensic physician knows full well that he 
neither has, can, or ought to have any "position^' or "relation^' to 
the Judge. That he, as a citizen of the State, is subordinate to his 
own forum, can of course be neither meant nor doubted. As a phy- 
sician, however, he has not the most remote pretensions at any time, 
or under any circumstances, to any different " relation " to the Judge 
from that of any other professional witness or expert. His position as 
a citizen of the State binds him to appear as a witness when called 
upon by the Judge ; but the physician has just as little pretension to 
any " relation^' to the Judge, or to be his " assessor,'* as the copper- 
smith who is called upon to determine the value of a stolen kettle, 
the builder, who is required to value a piece of ground, or the learned 
interpreter who is wanted to translate some piece of Turkish writing. 
For the physician is nothing more and nothing less than a profes- 
sional witness, whose attendance the Judge requires when his opinion 
is needed in any case, or in any doubtful question pertaining to his 
profession, just as in similar cases he requires the attendance of 
hundreds of other experts, whose opinion he listens to, having sworn 
them for that purpose, to whom he orders the statutory fees of wit- 
nesses to be paid, and whom he then — courteously dismisses. Where 
is there in all this any question of a peculiar "relation to the 
Judge?'' All that has been brought forward of an opposite view 
displays a practical ignorance of the position, and is nothing but idle 
fancy, the emanation of that CTroneous idea which has certainly the 
authority of a few centuries in its favour, but nothing else, that 
forensic medicine and the science of law, physician and Judge are as 
it were in a peculiar state of connubial relation, in which it was of 
consequence to define the position of the consorts to one another. 
But such a connubium never existed anywhere; the Judges have 
most properiy striven against this idea from time immemorial ; emi- 
nent jurists of the eighteenth century have been desirous to send the 
whole matter to Jericho ; and it is somewhat remarkable to find that 
physicians themselves, quite against their own interests, are for ever 
coming back to this union. 



CHAPTER II. 

THE MEDICO-LEGAL INVESTIGATION. 

Statutory Eegtjlations. 

For investigations regarding doubtful mental conditions^ — vide 

Special Division, § ^^^ farther on 
For investigations regarding human corpses, — vide Yol. I., General 

Division, Part HI., p. 83. 

§ 5. General. — Of the Presence op the Judge. 

Since every medico-legal investigation is simply a medical one, we 
scarcely require to enumerate the general conditions and requirements 
necessary for a thorough and satisfactory examination, since these do 
not differ from those required in any other thorough medical inves- 
tigation : a knowledge of the subject, coolness, and impartiality. It 
is often very difficult for a medical jurist long in practice to main- 
tain his impartiality, because he is always learning more and more of 
the cunning, deceit, passions, and sinful tendencies of those whom 
he has to examine. The forensic physician dare no longer be with- 
out the usual apparatus required in medical investigations, from 
litmus-paper and a magnifying-glass up to a microscope, though the 
latter will be but seldom employed in actual forensic examinations, 
and in general only for investigating blood-corpuscles, crystals of 
hsemin, and spermatozoa, and in very rare cases for the purpose of 
determining the existence of vegetable poisons in the stomach, or of 
diagnosing the nature of stuffs, as linen or woollen, &c., or of hair, 
as human or animal, &c.* But in medico-legal, as opposed to private 
medical investigations, there are a few essential formalities which 
require to be considered. When I come to speak of the official 
certificate (§ 16), I shall point out more clearly that a medico-legal 

• In regard to the apparatus for dissection (prescribed by statute) and 
the difference between a judicial and a pathologicad examination of the body, 
vide Vol. I. p. 83, and § 60, p. 212. 



§ 5. OF THE PRESENCE OF THE JUDGE. 185 

examination can only take place upon the previous official requisi- 
tion of the proper parties. It has been a source of much dispute, 
whether the presence of the Judge at a medico-legal examination is 
necessary or judicious, or neither? Since this always takes place 
purely for the sake of the Judge himself, and in the interests of 
justice, it ought to have been considered that the regulation of this 
matter and the answering of this question belongs to the legislature 
of the State, and not to medical jurisprudence. And the legisla- 
ture has taken it upon her to do so. In Prussia the presence of the 
Judge is only prescribed by statute in two kinds of medico-legal 
examinations, at the investigation of disputed mental conditions, 
the result of which may be employed as the means of obtaining a 
legal interdiction on account of imbecility (or mania), and at the 
examination of human bodies. In the first case, the Judge may and 
does form a general opinion as to the mental condition of the party 
examined, as may also the curator, whose presence is also prescribed 
{Vide § 65), and the presence of the Judge at the investigation of 
human bodies is simply a matter of necessity, and the Prussian 
criminal code (§157) has very properly ordered by statute the 
*' presence of the law officials.^' For " the law official presiding at 
the examination of the body^' — by which of course no technical 
direction of the examination is meant — " must first take care to have 
the body exposed for the purpose of identification to the view of 
those acquainted with the deceased, and if possible, also, to the sus- 
pected or avowed perpetrator of the deed,^' and must at all events, 
" take every means to assure himself that there has been no error or 
mistake in regard to the body.'^ Further, in any case where 
injuries are found, the Judge must lay before the experts '^any 
weapons which may be found, and take their opinion as to whether 
the injuries could have been produced by the said weapons," 
&c. {loc. cit. § § 159, 161, 162). These are all, it is evident, purely 
and exclusively judicial requirements; and since all that we have re- 
lated must be decided on the body itself, the presence of the law 
officials at the examination of it is a self-evident necessity. The case 
is precisely similar in regard to the medico-legal examination of 
those bodies suspected to have been poisoned. It is the duty of the 
presiding law official ; and then he is very properly farther enjoined 
to '^exercise the utmost circumspection in making sure that the 
(suspected) solid and fluid matters to be analysed are not changed, 
but that their identity is placed beyond a doubt/' wherefore these 



186 5 '5. OF THE PRESENCE OF THE JUDGE. 

matters^ after being ofiBcially sealed, are delivered over to the experts, 
along with an official report {loc. ciL §167). 

The presence of the Judge is not prescribed by statute, and is, 
therefore, not customary (in Prussia) in any other kind of medico- 
legal examination except the two referred to. This presence could 
only be prescribed for one of two purposes. Either it might be in- 
tended to act as a check in securing a sufficiently complete and 
thorough examination on the part of the physician, an object which 
does not require to be shown to be quite illusory; or the presence of 
the Judge might be prescribed with the intention that he himself should 
thereby gather information from the more important appearances 
found at this examination. In fact, the Prussian criminal code also 
prescribes (§ 168) that the legal official presiding at the medico-legal 
examination of a body ^' shall cause to be shown him everything that 
can be observed by the senses,^' and in the case of such very evident 
appearances as are so often found in the course of these examinations, 
as, for instance, smashing of the skull-bones, wounds of every kind, 
the floating of the lungs of children, destruction of the stomach by 
sulphuric acid, large effusions of blood into the cavities of the body, 
&c., it is just as easy as it is proper that these should be pointed out 
to the Judge during the examination. For the intrinsic value of the 
appearances, however, he is always indebted to the opinion of the 
physician. And this is the case in a much higher degree in regard 
to the examination of other objects. What advantage could it be 
to either party for instance, that the Judge should be present at an 
examination for arsenic by Marsh's process, and be shown the me- 
tallic stain produced upon the porcelain plate ? Has the Judge him- 
self an independent conviction of the presence of arsenic ? And how 
is this conviction affected, should perchance the medical jurist know 
nothing as to the diagnosis of arsenical from autimonial stains ? Of 
what use would be the presence of the Judge at the examination of 
a case of doubtful pregnancy, of a disputed bodily disease, of a case 
of pretended rape, &c.? Certainly not the least; indeed it might 
in not a few cases have an injurious influence. 

The presence of the Judge at a medico-legal investigation, has, 
therefore, to be decided by the legislature, and not by forensic medi- 
cine. The latter can only declare that his presence in a certain few 
cases of investigation is judicious ; it has, however, no interest in 
desiring that this presence of the legal official should be extended to 
the larger proportion of all medico-legal investigations. 



§ 6. INSPECTION OF THE DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE. 187 



§ 6. Inspection op thb Docxjmentary Evidence. 

The question whether it is necessary or judicious for the medical 
jurist to be granted permission by the Judge to inspect the docu- 
mentary evidence received up to tbat time, to enable him the better 
to fulfil the object of the examination and prepare his report ? has 
also been much disputed both by lawyers and medical men. In the 
first place, in regard to the statutory regulations in Prussia in this 
respect, there only exists one medical regulation in regard to it, of 
date 1791, and this only in respect to the dissection of the body; in 
it an inspection of the documentary evidence is debarred, and the 
medical inspectors are told, "that they must restrict their opinion 
to the appearances found in the body dissected.^' And even lawyers 
of mark have recommended that the physician should be referred 
for his opinion solely and exclusively to what he finds himself. Of 
course in this the desire is evident, that the physician should proceed 
to the examination unprejudiced and unconfused by the mass of 
preliminary and insuflSciently determinate depositions to be found in 
the documentary evidence ; the leading idea evidently is, if anything 
is to be found, the physician will find it, and will explain it to us, and 
we will be satisfied. But the physician ought not to add to the 
evidence a bare description of the appearances found, but conclusions, 
the scientific results obtained from the appearances found ; and this 
is precisely what is wanted from him. At the time, however, of the 
promulgation of the ancient regulation referred to, this was in many 
cases quite impossible, and specially so in regard to the very object 
for which this regulation was prescribed, and so it remained till the 
appearance of the New Penal Code (1851). For, as is well-known, 
up to the time referred to the absurd theory of degrees of lethality 
prevailed in regard to injuries. Without any knowledge of the pre- 
vious facts of the case, therefore, the medical jurist was required, 
from the mere " appearances found in the body dissected,'^ to decide 
whether a so-called "accidental'' or "individual'' lethality existed, 
whether perhaps a man with a fracture had been conveyed for 
miles unbandaged, whether he was drunk, or whether he had been 
treated in the most absurd manner possible, &c. ! 

In other cases, however, the medical jurist does not know 
what be ought to look for. This is often the case in doubtful 
conditions of the mind which he may have to examine. For 



188 § 6. INSPECTION OF THE DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE. 

example^ a physician may examine for a whole day a party possessed 
of some fixed idea without discovering anything that could raise 
a doubt as to the perfect soundness of his mind^ till a single 
word in the documentary evidence gives him the clue, and in 
one instant the case becomes dear. In other cases again^ that often 
occur, without such an inspection of the evidence the physician is 
obliged to rely solely on the statements of the person examined, con- 
sisting in general of lies and fraudulent statements, or at least of 
intentional exa^erations. Such cases are most frequent in accusa- 
tions of rape, of injury, &c. The person injured gives him, for ex- 
ample, a perfectly untrue history of the occurrence and description 
of the instrument employed, in order to lead the examining physician 
to an erroneous decision in his own favour, while an inspection of 
the evidence and the statement of eyewitnesses of the occurrence at 
once puts the matter in its true light. It is therefore the task of 
the physician in every case to bring the facts ascertained in evidence 
into unison with the appearances found, and where this cannot be 
attained, to explain in the opinion which he gives that such is the 
case. It is perfectly certain, as I can testify from the experience of 
hundreds of cases, that a knowledge of the documentary evidence is 
not only often very necessary, but at times actually indispensable, so 
that the medical jurist very often finds himself so placed that he 
must beg from the Judge a sight of the evidence either before the 
examination or subsequent to it, and before giving his opinion, where 
the Judge has not already spontaneously placed him in possession of 
the documents, which is the usual practice in the law courts of 
Berlin. Where a difierent custom prevails, it will be of use, at least 
to the (Prussian) medical jurist, to know, that there is no statute nor 
regulation in existence which forbids the Judge to grant a sight of 
the documentary evidence to the medical jurist ; should this, how- 
ever, be refused, then there is no other course open to the physician 
in cases which positively require it, than to declare that the mere 
results of his examination without any previous knowledge of the cir- 
cumstances of the case, do not suffice to enable him to give a 
conscientious and satisfactory opinion in regard to the case. There 
must be something strangely peculiar in the parties occupied with 
the case, if the Judge should, after such an explanatory appeal, still 
continue his refusal. Finally, however, the present system of public 
oral trial has placed the question of the inspection of the evidence in 
a perfectly different position from what it formerly was, especially 



§ 7; PLACE FOR THE EXAMINATION. 189 

when, as frequently happens, the physician is not called upon in the 
preliminary investigation, hut is summoned for the first time to the 
public trial to make an examination, and at once report upon it 
orally; in this case, he sees the whole circumstances of the case 
unravelled before him at the time of trial. 

§ 7. Place for the Examination. 

Besides those investigations which take place in the presence of 
the Judge at the court, or in the deadhouse (§ 5), there are others 
which take place either at the dwelling of the physician or that of 
the person to be examined. Experience teaches us that the latter 
is by far the most suitable place, be it ever so small and confined. 
And yet those to be examined are very frequently sent by the Judge 
to the house of the medical man, because the expenses are thereby 
much lessened, particularly in country districts, where, under opposite 
circumstances, travelling expenses, board, &c., would have to be 
allowed. But, whoever comes to a medical man's house in any legal 
matter in which for his own sake he wishes to deceive the doctor, 
brings with him a stick or a crutch, without which he cannot walk ; 
he puts on clean linen, and just before entering he empties his 
bladder in order to conceal the gonorrhoea with which he is affected ; 
he has had himself cupped the day before, quite unnecessarily, in 
order to be able to show the fresh scar; he brings his wife with him, 
because he is so weak-minded that he cannot find the way by him- 
self; he brings with him pills and mixtures which have been prescribed 
for him within the last few days, &c., &c. How often, however, 
when, with the order in our pocket, we suddenly drop upon the person 
to be examined at his own house, do we not find all this reversed. 
The man with the crutch digs and plants in his garden ; he with the 
gonorrhcEa cannot hide his disease; the woman, with so weak a 
stomach that she cannot digest the prison diet, is enjoying with her 
family a very inferior meal, and that other, who has formerly pre- 
sented herself in a double dress and rolled in shawls, because her 
medical attendant has warned her to avoid the slightest exposure to 
a draught, is met in stormy weather not only not at home, but going 
to a fair or to the races. Such experiences are of such common oc- 
currence, that in innumerable instances, in which I have felt a doubt 
about the case, I have felt it to be my duty to pay repeated subse- 
quent visits at their own house to parties who have been sent to mine 



190 § 8. OBJECT OF THE EXAMINATION. 

for examination by the Judge. In a very high degree is this the case 
in the examination of disputed mental affections. All medico-legal 
and alienist physicians know how cunningly and consistently disease 
may be concealed by those, particularly if only partially imbecile, 
who have any object for dissimulation; for instance, when (how 
often is this the case !) they earnestly desire an interdiction to be 
removed. Such parties, when '^sisted*' by the Judge to appear 
before the physician, come before him in such a fashion that 
even a man of experience might be convinced of their complete re- 
storation, or in other cases of the falsity of the imputation of mental 
disease. But when surprised at home for the purpose of examina- 
tion, these very people are found busy writing nonsensical letters of 
complaint, whole piles of which lie before them, or with the study of 
a self-prepared pedigree of nobility, or with the composition of 
entire sheets of absurd verses, &c. ; or we may find some remarkable 
and quite peculiar arrangement of the dwelling, &c. 

§ 8. Object of the Examination. 
The medical examination of a living man, in foro, may have for 
its object the attainment of one of seven practical judicial ends. 
1. To ascertain the power of undergoing imprisonment, which may 
be disputed by the prisoner to be on account of some pretended 
disease; 2. To determine the existence of some doubtful and pre- 
tended disease which is said to prevent the person to be examined 
from appearing before the court ; 3. Por similar reasons it is often 
needful to examine the grounds of a disputed ability to labour, or 
capability of entering the public service, or of a man^s continuing to 
hold an office with which he has long been invested ; 4. Injuries on 
the living may become the objects of a scientific investigation; 
6. Disputed sexual relations may require to be examined; 6. The 
doubtful mental condition of an individual may require to be ex- 
amined into and determined ; and 7, finally, various matters which 
do not come under any of the above headings, occasionally require 
to be examined for various ends; these are often enough merely 
medico-legal curiosities. Of 6894 cases of living persons, medico- 
legally examined by me up to the end of the year 1858, there 
were — 

Cases. Percent 

Disputed capacity for undergoing imprisonment for debt . . 3372 =: 48-8 
„ n enduring a penalimprisonment . . . 1462 = 21-2 

4834 = 70^0 



§ 9. IMPRISONMENT FOR DEBT. 191 

Case«4 Per cent. 

Brought forward 4834 = 70.0 

Disputed capacity for appearing tn/oro 120= 1*7 

„ „ service, or other means of getting a 

livelihood 608 = 8'8 

„ results of injuries 389 = 5-6 

„ sexual relations 323 = 4 '6 

„ mental condition 559 = 8* 

Various reasons 61 = 0-9 

6894 = 99-6 

In other places, districts and countries with different laws, these 
relations will be certainly modified. For example, the regulation 
recently promulgated among us, that creditors should, in the case of 
pretended sickness, immediately cause their debtors to be removed 
into an hospital, at their (the creditors') expense, has (of course !) 
very considerably diminished the number of debtors to be examined. 

§ 9. Continuation. 

1. Disputed Capacity foe Enduring Imprisonment. — a. Im- 
prisonment FOR Debt. 

Statutory Regulations. 

Rhenish Civil Code, Art. 2066. Personal arrest cannot be 
carried out when the jperson to be arrested is above seventy years of 
age, a married, or an unmarried female, except in the case of fraud. 

As we have seen, almost three-fourths of aU cases of the medico- 
legal examinations of persons alive are undertaken for the purpose 
of ascertaining their capability of enduring imprisonment. The 
examination is carried out either with the object of ascertaining 
whether the person to be punished is actually incapacitated by the 
state of his health from undergoing an imprisonment for debt, that 
is, whether there be general medical reasons for supposing that an 
imprisonment for debt would, in his case, be attended with actual 
danger to life and health ? * Or, in criminal cases, whether any such 
danger is to be apprehended from the carrying out of a sentence of 
imprisonment or penal servitude ? The danger therefore is, what, from 
the very nature of the thing, properly understood — and in Prussia 

* These are the very words employed in the printed directions of the 
Royal Burgh Court of Berlin, sent to me when required to examine those 
endeavouring to shun imprisonment for debt. 



192 S 9. IMPRISONMENT FOR DEBT. 

also, according to the official direction {Fide § 16, furtlier on) — 
must be ahoays kept before him by the officially-sworn physician, 
and not the mere fact of the actual existence of disease. Many in- 
dispositions, complaints, slighter illnesses, and even actual diseases, or 
dispositions to actually important diseases, such as tuberculosis, are 
quite compatible with the sufferance of imprisonment, either penal or for 
debt, without any injury to the health. Indeed, cases often enough 
occur, in which imprisonment is positively beneficial to the health of 
those imprisoned, as in gout and rheumatic diseases in autumn and 
winter ; in those broken down by drunkenness; or in cachectic in- 
dividuals of the lower classes, such as are reckoned by thousands 
in all large towns ; all their wants are provided for, their health- 
destroying mode of life is properly regulated, and for their improve- 
ment the greatest exertions are continally made when they are once 
brought to penal imprisonment ; further, this is also the case with 
those numerous cases of people with old varicose ulcers, in whom 
the sedentary Ufe and restricted diet prove more beneficial than their 
usual habits, &c. 

On the other hand, the medical jurist must also pay conscientious 
regard to those evils often enough observed in other cases, which do 
not perhaps involve personal danger to the person to be imprisoned, 
though they may be productive of danger to his fellow-prisoners, or 
may be only a source of repulsive annoyance to them. This is par- 
ticularly the case, where, as in Berlin, the debtors' prison has no 
division for the sick, with a separate staff of attendants, such as 
exists in all penal institutions. Por these reasons in all places 
possessed of similar arrangements, all those afflicted with actual (not 
merely simulated !) syphilis, still capable of communicating infec- 
tion, all epileptics and those afflicted with similar convulsive diseases ; 
all paralytics, obliged constantly to rely on the support and assistance 
of others, all those completely blind, &c., must be declared to be 
incapable of undergoing imprisonment for debt. A horse-dealer 
suffered from an inveterate prolapse of the rectum ; at each attempt 
to go to stool, as I myself have repeatedly observed, the bowel pro- 
truded from four to six inches, and from the presence of hsemor- 
rhoidal sweUings it could only be replaced with considerable trouble. 
It could not be expected that his fellow-prisoners should perform 
this operation. An umbrella manufacturer had, hke the man whose 
case has just been referred to, for many years avoided imprisonment 
for debt, and repeated examinations convinced me of the actual exist- 



§ 9. IMPRISONMENT FOR DEBT. 193 

ence of his complaint ; he had on the left side of the nates, close to 
the rectum, a large cystic swelling, which pressed upon the bowel 
and rendered the evacuation of the faeces extremely difficult; this 
condition could be artificially alleviated by the assistance of his wife 
or grown-up children, but this assistance could not very properly be 
required from his associates in prison ! A pawnbroker suffered from 
chronic bronchial catarrh, accompanied with a very violent barking 
cough, as I myself have often heard when the sick man was quite 
unaware of my entrance into the house. This man must also be 
declared to be unfit for undergoing imprisonment for debt. The 
same is the case with all those afflicted with cancerous diseases, 
which contaminate the air of the room in a manner most repulsive, 
and even injurious for the other prisoners, presupposing that no 
cells exist for the purpose of isolating those afflicted with such and 
similar diseases. Also all those suffering from varicose ulcers, which 
stink even at a distance, and similar disorders. Finally, all those 
afflicted with real (and not merely simulated) complaints of different 
kinds — always presupposing the want of an hospital within the debtor 
prison — ^must be excluded from undergoing civil imprisonment, not 
because this would be fraught with danger to themselves, as because 
their continuance in prison would be productive of a perfectly 
unendurable burden for the attendants (and also their fellow- 
prisoners). To this category belong cases of incontinence of urine, 
which are of frequent occurrence ; those aflBicted with considerable 
faecal or rectal fistulae, and similar diseases, which are continually 
polluting the linen and bedclothes, and thus contaminating the air. 

Finally, among temporary causes of non-capabihty for undergoing 
imprisonment must be recognised recent delivery, pregnancy, and 
nursing, whenever, as is usually the case, there is no proper place 
within the institution for the confinement taking place, and no 
proper attendance for the nursling. 

Peculiar cases come extremely frequent before us, in which those 
about to be imprisoned for debt seek to avoid it, or at least to obtain 
a longer respite from it, by bringing certificates from their medical 
attendants, or, perhaps without this certificate, by stating orally, 
that their disease requires them to undergo a tedious process of cure, 
or that they have already commenced this, and cannot interrupt it 
'' without danger to their health.^' The cures thus referred to, are 
courses of mineral waters or baths, Zittman's cure (anti-syphilitic), 
Eussian va.pour-baths, electro-magnetism and the water-cure. Pre- 

VOL. III. o 



194 9.-^. IMPRISONMENT FOR DEBT. 

cisiely the same allegation is often made in respect to snrgical opera- 
tions said to be impending. The medical jurist is frequently in a position 
to ascertain Mrith tolerable ease the untruthful nature of these state- 
ments ; for instance, when no such diseased condition exists, or any 
ailment which would necessitate the employment of any such method 
of cure or operation ; for instance, when the person to be examined 
states, that he " has a cataract '' in one eye, but nothing at all 
requiring operative interference, least of all a cataract, can be dis- 
covered. In other cases in which there is no such evident deception, 
each case must be individualised and carefully considered in regard 
to all its concomitant circumstances. Por instance, it has often 
enough happened to myself that in cases in which some certain mode 
of cure, such as Zittman's, or some certain spring, was indubitably 
indicated, and in which the medical man in attendance had probably 
spoken, by the way, of employing it, the sick man, who was at that 
very time according to his own statement in the middle of a cure 
which could not be interrupted, did not even know the name of the 
mineral water which he drank, nor how to describe the very peculiar 
method of employing Zittman's decoction, &c., and thus he betrayed 
himself. The deceptions which are attempted to be practised in 
regard to the question of capacity for undergoing imprisonment are in- 
numerable, and the medical jurist cannot be too much upon his guard. 
There are always three circumstances which must be considered 
in estimating the injury to health which may result from imprison- 
ment, since, as we have already shown, even sick persons are not always 
incapacitated by their illness from undergoing imprisonment. I refer 
to the duration of the confinement, the locality and internal arrange- 
ments of the prison, and the mode of life prescribed administratively 
for the prisoners. These circumstances vary in different towns and 
countries. In Prussia imprisonment for debt is restricted by statute to 
one year, and for a protested bill of exchange to five years ; the medical 
jurist wiQ therefore have to consider in every case the probable effect of 
so long an imprisonment, and to ask himself in any given case if this 
man is able to endure so long a period of imprisonment without 
'^ danger,'' though indeed, in by far the larger proportion of cases the 
imprisonment is of much shorter duration, since of course it is evident, 
that imprisonment for debt may end at any moment when the claims of 
the creditor are satisfied. The second circumstance of importance to 
consider, the nature of the locality, will vary with every change of 
place. Very large towns generally possess prisons espedally devoted 



§ 10.—6. PENAL IMPRISONMENT. 195 

to debtors, but this is not the case with smaller towns, in which, as 
I myself have seen, the prisons for debtors and for criminals are 
usually placed under the same roof. Of course, however, a man 
may, without injury to his health, suffer imprisonment for debt in a 
favourably situated, well-built house with dry, airy, light, easily 
heated, never over-filled rooms, and large courts, a locality which is 
perhaps indubitably more healthy than his own dwelling, whilst 
some hesitation may be felt in declaring the same man to be capable 
of suffering imprisonment under circumstances which are entirely 
different. In regard to the internal arrangements of the different 
debtors' prisons, much will of course depend upon whether facilities 
be provided for procuring attendance upon the sick, or medical 
assistance, or whether this is not the case, as in Berlin, where im- 
prisoned debtors are at once set free on becoming ill. Finally, it is 
of importance for the medical jurist to consider the different modes 
of living in the various debtors' prisons. In this respect there is no 
general rule, not even a rule generally applicable throughout the 
same country, as in the case of the penal institutions of the different 
states. The physician can only form his opinion in regard to 
this from the relative amount of time for daily exercise in the open 
air permitted by the Boards of administration, and the diet prescribed 
for the prisoners. In Berlin, the former amounts to the certainly 
more than sufficient amount of two hours daily ; the latter is with 
us, as is more or less the case everywhere, certainly meagre, sipce 
the creditors have to support their imprisoned debtors,* The riotous 
living and orgies, which the Parisian debtors' prison at Chchy have 
rendered so notorious, have, so far as I know, never been permitted 
in Germany. 

§ 10. Continuation. — Disputed Capacity fob, undergoing 
Imprisonment. — {b.) Penal Imprisonment. 

In general all that has been just said in regard to capability of 
undergoing imprisonment for debt, is equally applicable to penal im- 

• The debtors imprisoned in Beriin receive, every morning, soup made with 
fat, and half-a-pound of good ryebread ; at midday one quart of thin vege- 
table broth, made with cabbage, peas, turnips, barley, &c., and a little fat, 
with quarter of a-pound of bread ; in the evening, half-a-pound of bread, and 
salt; and on Sundays, rice soup, with quarter of a-pound of beef. The 
prisoners are allowed to be provided with better diet by their families. All 
spirituous liquors are, however, forbidden. 

o 2 



196 S 10.— ft. PENAL IMPRISONMENT. 

prisonment^ and I have only a few words to say in regard to some 
modification thereof, which experience has taught me. The simula- 
tions, tricks and deceptions attempted to be practised on the medical 
officer where the matter in hand is a mere imprisonment for debt, 
are, if possible, greatly surpassed when the party to be examined hopes 
thereby to escape an imprisonment or penal servitude to which he 
has been condemned, or at least to postpone its commencement. 
These deceptions are very often maintained with great obstinacy and 
consistency, but they have in recent days met with a decided check, 
in Prussia at least, by the transference of the care of the prisons 
from the law courts to the Board of police, so that now, when a 
sentence of imprisonment is handed to the local police for execution, 
or when they are required to lodge a man in jail for the purposes of 
preliminary inquiry, they at once, without further inquiry, proceed to 
lodge the party in jail, provided he is not completely unable to be 
moved. The real or pretended existence of disease avails him 
nought, since in every penal prison there are hospitals, and medical 
assistance is always to be procured. When in any given case the 
physician to the prison is of opinion that the patient cannot be longer 
retained, even in the prison hospital, then, for the first time, the 
medical jurist is consulted, or is charged with the examination of 
the prisoner already set free, in order that his opinion may be ascer- 
tained as to the possibility of the penal imprisonment being carried 
out. Penal imprisonment is always more severe than that for debt, 
and although the locality of certain prisons may possess more favour- 
able conditions for the physical welfare of its inmates, than that of 
others, yet there are certain other conditions which are common to 
all. In none of the penal institutions have the prisoners, as in 
debtors' prisons, actual bedsteads and beds, even during the night, 
and still less so for occasional use during the day by feeble and 
ailing individuals, but the straw mattresses and woollen coverlets 
which are laid over the floor for night use, are in the early morning 
removed from the " number/' In penal institutions the prisoners 
are bound to work (according to their strength), and must complete 
their daily task under pain of punishment ; while debtors may of 
course spend their time in prison as they please. Convicts are also 
never allowed to spend so much time in the open air as debtors. 
Finally, the diet, though on the whole similar to that in debtors' 
prisons, is yet in so far stiU more meagre, inasmuch as butcher-meat 
is given much seldomer in penal institutions, in many only once a- 



§ 10.-5. PENAL IMPRISONMENT. 197 

year. I have ascertained that a simUar regimen is also followed in 
the prisons of other German States, and indeed in those out of Ger- 
many, except that the bread in England, France, and Italy is better and 
lighter.* The medical opinion in regard to a sick or ailing convict 
must be regulated by a knowledge of their circumstances. In re- 
gard to penal imprisoment, however, there are two circumstances 
which make it somewhat easier to give a decided opinion than in 
regard to imprisonment for debt. The first is, that the medical 
jurist learns from the requisition of the Judge exactly how long the 
sentence of the deprivation of freedom (and penal servitude) has to 
run, for instance, one day, six weeks, one, two, or six years, or for 
life. Thus he will be able to declare many persons quite fit to suffer 
imprisonment for a few weeks or months, whilst he might probably 
object to declare them capable of suffering imprisonment for a longer 
period — such as for one or for five years, as in cases of debt or pro- 
tested bill of exchange ( Fide p. 1 94, Vol . III.) — though the imprison- 
ment may possibly not last as long. The second is of not less import- 
ance. Imprisonment for debt cannot, but penal servitude may be 
interrupted. The medical jurist in critical, cases may be required to 
say, whether in regard to the convict's state of health the penal sentence 
may not nevertheless be carried out ''with modifications,^^ and he 
has then ample opportunity of bringing forward all that can be 
conscientiously pleaded in regard to the state of health of the convict 
in question. Thus, in one case, he can insist on the necessity of the 

• In Berlin convicts receive : — 1- In the towns prison : in the morning, 
half-a-quart of fat meal-and-bread soup (or porridge) and half-a-pound of 
good rjebread ; at noon, a quart of thick vegetable broth, boiled with fat 
(similar to that referred to at p. 195, Vol. III.)* and a-quarter of a-pound of 
bread ; in the evening, half-a-pound of bread, with salt. On Sunday, the 
chief meal at noon is flesh-broth, and one-eighth of a-pound of beef is given 
with it. 2. In the district jail and penal prison the diet is the same, but at 
midday half-a-pound of bread is allowed, and nine times a-year, on the high 
festiv^s, one quarter of a-pound of flesh. In both prisons, convicts are ex- 
ceptionally permitted to provide their own diet, and they are also allowed to 
procure beer and sausages from their surplus earnings. 3. In the large 
Penitentiary one pound and a-quarter of good ryebread are allowed daily. 
Every morning a soup (or porridge) made with 2 oz. 4 drs. (imp.) of barley- 
meal ; at noon a dish of beans, cabbage, peas, or the like, weighing 6 oz. 
(imp.), with 8 drs. (imp.) of fat or beef suet, 8 drs. (imp.) of salt, and about 
^ of a-peck (imp.) of potatoes. In the evening porridge made with oatmeal, 
or 2 oz. (imp.) of barley-meal. Four times a-year, on high feast-days, half- 
a-pound of flesh including bones. 



198 § 10—5. PENAL IMPRISONMENT. 

(better and more digestible) hospital diet^ instead of that usoal in the 
prison ; in another case, on the need there is for permitting the use 
of a bed, greater freedom for exercise, less strenuous labour, or a 
holiday once a month of so many days for recreation, &c. But care 
must be taken not to grant such favours without the most urgent 
indications, and indeed in every case the greatest strictness must be 
exercised hy every conscientiotis medical official in judging of each 
individual case of disputed capacity for undergoing imprisonment. 
He cannot better fulfil the duties imposed on him by his oath of 
office, the great trust which the State reposes in him,* or the require- 
ments of society in general, than by refusing to listen in every such 
case to any other reasons than those derived from a conscientious 
consideration of the state of health in question. He has to do with 
men out of every position in society, and I, in common with 
every other medical jurist in large towns, have often enough had to 
examine for the purpose of ascertaining their capacity for under- 
going imprisonment, not only the usual large proportion of injli- 
viduals out of the lowest classes, but also some from the highest 
circles, and these not only debtors but even convicts. But as the 
jury takes no cognizance whether the culprit at the bar accused 
of rape is a man of noble birth, or whether another accused of 
forgery be a highly-educated lady, and as the physician in his ordi- 
nary practice is stUl less given to model his ideas and treatment of 
any given disease in accordance with such external circumstances, so 
must the medical jurist guard against his being influenced by them. 
I am the more careful in bringing this forward, though of itself 
it is obviously true, because, particularly at the commencement of 
forensic life, a man is hardly prepared for the fact, that men 
from the higher and better educated classes would so grossly seek 
to get the better of, and so unashamedly try to deceive a medical man 
in these matters, and also, because a man might hesitate in giving 
his opinion as to a case of a disputed capacity for undergoing im- 
prisonment, not to regard so great a change of life, as that from a 
drawing-room to a prison, as an important circumstance likely to be 
prejudicial to health. Experience does not confirm this idea. I have 
no lack, alas ! of numerous examples of the truth of this statement. 
But I do not consider it profitable to detail even a few of the many 
thousand cases observed, illustrative of this question. For each indi- 
vidual case involves nothing else than the usual diagnostic examina- 
tion, such as every physician must carry out in every case where 



§ 11. ABILITY TO APPEAR BEFORE THE COURT. 199 

disease is stated to exist. It is more suited to the ends of this book 
to state thoseprmciples which, according to my experience, are to be 
regarded as sound in determining any case of disputed capacity for 
undergoing imprisonment, and this the rather that this question has 
not received that thorough consideration which it deserves, seeing 
that its solution constitutes so large a part of the duty of the forensic 
physician {Vide^. 190, Vol. III.). Moreover, the subject of feigned 
disease in itself shall be considered subsequently (§ 63 ; vide also in 
regard to the medico-legal certificate, § 16). 

§ 11. Continuation. — 2. Disputed Ability to appea.r before 

THE Court. 

According to the number of cases of this character that have 
occurred (up to the end of the year 1858), I have one hundred 
and twenty times had to determine whether a man's condition of 
health was such as to prevent him appearing before the court, as he 
and his medical attendant have supposed. The case is here two- 
fold. It is stated either that the patient cannot leave his room at 
all at that time, or that he is in such a mental or bodily condition 
as to render it dangerous for him to appear before the court. 
Should the person to be examined be actually found, as often hap- 
pens, sick and confined to his room or his bed, the case is of course 
very simple. But in this, as in everything else, the most extraordi- 
nary events are found to occur, of which the illustrative cases about 
to be related give a few examples. The reasons for deceiving the 
physician are not far to seek. There may be a hundred reasons for 
unwillingness to give evidence ; and a man summoned as a juryman 
may consider himself entitled to a dispensation on account of his 
health. Not unfrequently the accused himself seeks, by not appear- 
ing at the trial, to prolong the matter ; in very many cases the 
parties interested, who are called upon to take what is called an oath 
of manifestation — that is, to make a statement upon oath as to their 
means in cases of insolvency — declare that they are so ailing that 
they cannot ascertain the state of their affairs, and still less are 
they in a position to make an oath regarding them; in many 
cases of divorce, the wives refused to appear at the statutory 
period for reconciliation, because their feeble nerves could not stand 
such a shock, &c. In general, these and all such statements, as, 
" I run the risk of a shock of apoplexy,'' &c., are pure pretexts and 



200 § 11. ABILITY TO APPEAR BEFORE THE COURT. 

modes of speech, which will not lead astray an experienced medical 
jurist. In this matter, too, it is no man's duty to hinder the ends of 
justice, unless induced to do so by some urgent necessity obvious to 
every conscientious physician. If the court of law is in the neigh- 
bourhood, a man, though actually suffering so much from some 
unimportant disease as to be unable to walk, may yet be conveyed 
thither. Should attendance at the trial require a journey to some 
distant court, we must be guided in our opinion by the circum- 
stances of the case. In other cases the state of the patient may be 
such that the physician is obliged to declare to the Judge that he 
cannot appear inforo, but that he is quite capable of being examined 
at his own house ; and this is very often done, and the ends of justice 
thereby attained. Finally, cases have also occurred to myself, in which 
repeated examinations have been ordered from time to time, and in 
which I have been always obliged to stand by my previous opinion, 
that this party cannot appear before the court, and these investiga- 
tions, &c., have been kept pending for years. An old woman, who 
was required to be examined in a case of wrong inflicted on an 
official of the magistrates, suffered from a very peculiar and violent 
convulsive affection, which attacked her several times a-day. When 
thus attacked she fell down, and commenced a kind of bellowing cry, 
which she kept up during the whole time of the convulsion, after 
which she slowly recovered. I have very often, on making an 
unexpected visit at her house, found her lying in one of these fits, 
and have thus convinced myself of their unfeigned character, and 
this opinion was also shared by disinterested parties who lived in the 
same house with her. My wits, however, being sharpened by the 
most unheard of cases of unimaginable and yet actual simulations, I 
at length held it to be advisable, in the course of years, in which the 
case was continually emerging, notwithstanding my constantly 
negative opinion, that at least one attempt should be made to go on 
with the trial. The accused appeared at the bar; she was quiet, 
composed, and open, but she was speedily seized by a violent con- 
vulsive attack, which at once put an end to the proceedings. I have 
subsequently had frequent occasion to observe her without her being 
seized with a fit while in my presence, a fact which convinced me 
still more of the reality of their existence. The woman died some 
time ago without having again appeared in court. A meal- 
dealer was indicted for a fraud on the revenue in which he was con- 
cerned. During the investigation he became insane, and was for a 



§ 12. ABILITY TO MAKE A LIVING. 201 

whole year in an asylum. At present he is in a state of complete 
dementia. The investigation, which has been pending for years, can 
never be completed, because my repeated examinations of this man 
must, of course, continually result in the same declaration, that 
he is not in a condition to transact any kind of business. 

§ 12. Continuation. — (3.) Disputed Ability to Mak^ a Live- 
lihood, OE FOR OfFICB-BEABING. 

Fide the Statutory Regulations in the Fourth Tart of the Special 
B-ivisiony §43. 

It is a frequent part of the duty of a medical jurist to investigate 
the bodily and mental conditions of a man, of whom it is maintained 
on the one hand, and disputed on the other, that he is either entirely 
or partially able to support himself, or that he is fit to undertake 
any office, or to continue to discharge the duties of some office 
which he has long held. Guardians assert the abiUty of their grown- 
up wards to obtain a livelihood, whilst the mother, for instance, 
or other relatives dispute this. Children to whom the support 
of their aged parents is burdensome, refuse to do so, and this 
refusal is complained of. In other cases, again, persons who have 
been formerly ill-treated or injured, raise an action of damages 
against those who have injured them, on account of their having 
been thereby partially or wholly unfitted for obtaining a hvelihood. 
These, and all other cases arising out of injuries {Fide §43, &c.), 
require the utmost caution in deciding, because a desire of revenge, 
laziness, and the love of living at another's expense, all combine in 
creating the greatest exertions to obscure the truth. The question 
of disputed capacity for office-bearing occurs in regard to officers of 
every possible kind, when for ih^ benefit of the service, which 
neither their health nor strength seems to permit them properly 
to discharge, it becomes a question with their governing boards 
whether they ought not to be pensioned. Usually it is the advance . 
of age that gives rise to this question, in other cases it is some 
disease which has lasted long and is apparently incurable, such as 
paralysis, rheumatic gout, writers^ palsy, &c., or repeated attacks of 
disease causing frequent absence from duty, such as spring and 
autumn relapses in phthisical patients, attacks of gout, &c., which 
finally compel the superintending boards to come to some decision in 



202 S 12. ABCLITY TO MAKE A LIVING. 

the case^ and the basis for this must be an investigation into the state 
of the patient's health by an official physician. In general^ such 
cases are precisely the reverse of those met with in examinations 
undertaken with the view of ascertaining a man's capability for unde 
going imprisonment. Egotism in both cases leads to attempts to 
deceive the physician, but the healthy prisoner gives himself out to 
be ill, while the diseased official represents himself as healthy, because 
he cannot do without the salary of his office, and cannot bear to have 
it lessened. There is nothing peculiar about the investigation ; and, 
in regard to the question of office-bearing, there are seldom any diffi- 
culties in the way, because the physician either knows exactly, or by 
inquiry, can easily and certainly learn, what is actually required in 
each case. The requirements, nature and extent of the duties of the 
higher officials of all the associate services, of the subaltern officials 
of every kind, clerks, messengers, messengers-at-arms, excise, post- 
office, and railway officials, gaolers, fee, are all very well known. For 
this reason I suppress the illustrative cases bearing upon this point, 
for every one knows that a gaoler who has grown quite deaf, an 
official registrar feeble and forgetful from age, an excise officer, a 
post-office runner, a railway guard, or other subordinate officer who 
has become quite paralytic from gout, and must nevertheless do his 
duty in all kinds of weather, &c., cannot be declared to be fit for his 
post. On the other hand, I must point out that in some of these 
cases of disputed capacity for office-bearing, it is often quite impos- 
sible for the most conscientious and most inflexibly-impartial medical 
jurist at once, on his first commission, to pronounce a decided opi- 
nion, especially when there is indubitably chronic disease present, 
and the complaints of the official board requiring the examination, 
and of the colleagues of the officer who have to act as his substitutes 
are perfectly well founded. The reason for this — only too well 
known to every physician — ^is the uncertainty of prognosis and thera- 
peutics aUke in every chronic disease ! In one case the person exa- 
mined states that his medical attendant has assured him that an 
operation about to be performed will be attended with the best 
results ; in another the same assurance has been made in regard to a 
course of mineral waters or baths to be taken next summer, or to a 
course of " Swedish gymnastics ^' just commenced, and to be con- 
tinued for some time, or to the water-cure, which also often lasts for 
months, &c. How often have I been so placed between the patient 
and his board as to be unable to declare the impossibility of the 



§ 12. ABILITY TO MAKE A LIVING. 203 

success of such a mode of cure and of his consequent complete 
restoration to fitness for his duties. In such cases the only resource 
is to request a further eisamination at a longer or shorter date^ and 
then by a careful consideration of the results attained by the means 
adopted, and of all the circumstances of the case, a correct opinion 
may be urrived at, though often only after repeated examinations 
during the lapse of many months. 

Cases of disputed ability to procure a livelihood are surrounded 
with much greater difficulties, and often, indeed, exceed the limits 
of medical competence. For in such cases circumstances, and things 
which are far from being objects of medical science, require to be 
considered, and yet the medical jurist is asked by the Judge if N. N. 
is in a condition to earn his living, partially or wholly."'^ Now, 
though one circumstance to be considered in such a case is certamly 
the bodily or mental condition of the said N. N., yet, another is one 
with which the medical man has nothing to do, viz. the value of 
what N. N. can Broduce compared with the price of food and other 
necessaries. In the case of one action raised, the children desired to 
withdraw a portion of the aliment hitherto granted their old mother, 
bedridden for years from paralysis of the lower extremities, declaring 
that she was able partially to support herself. The spinal paralysis 
was indubitable, but the woman could certainly knit with some 
trouble woollen stockings, at the rate of about four pairs in the 
month. What is the value of four pairs of stockings ? Medical 
science does not enable us to give an answer to this query. I only 
give this example of many similar cases in order to show that all 
that is to be done in such cases is to take the medical facts of the 
case, with all that can be learned as to the abiUty to work, in each 
individual case, and lay them before the Judge, leaving him to 
decide whether any or how much ability to earn a livelihood is 
thereby proved. * In many other cases of this character, medical men 
are also presupposed to possess another kind of knowledge, which 
likewise does not come within the scope of their own peculiar science. 
I refer to a knowledge of the work and technical manipulations in 
the various trades. This happens in medico-legal practice, not only 
in cases such as those just referred to, but also where parties injured 
declare their inability any longer to follow out their former caUing 
(Case YI.) ; also where young men must resolve upon embracing 
some one trade or other (Cases IV. and V.). But who has instructed 
♦ Vide the statutes quoted : Part Fourth, § 43. 



204 S 13. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

the physician how the shoemaker, the brazier, the hatter, the tanner, 
or the wheelwright, &c., perfonn their work in all its various parts ? 
How here the right arm, and there the left one ; in one case the 
chest, and in another the belly, are more immediately required ? As 
one of the results of a scufi9e, a shoemaker suffered from chronic 
periostitis of the left shin-bone. As he was otherwise perfectly healthy. 
I imagined that there was no reason why he should not be able to 
follow out his usual employment, but I was set right by being in- 
formed that a shoemaker constantly hammers on his knee, which would 
certainly occasion a painful concussion of the diseased shin-bone. 
Cases of this kind are of such great importance for both the parties 
concerned, and involve such grievous and burdensome obligations 
for the defendants, that they often give rise to litigations of many 
years' duration, and to a protraction of the case through all the sta- 
tutory medical courts. I shall therefore relate a few cases, selected 
from those instances which have come before me. 



§15. Illustrative Cases. 

Case I. — Disputed Capacity for Making a Livelihood. 

A widow demanded, through the law, that her daughter, still a 
minor, should allow her three thalers (9s. shillings) a-month for 
her support, as she stated that '' from her age, fifty-six years, she was 
now no longer in a position entirely to maintain herself, since she 
had an abdominal complaint, and her eyes were so weak that she 
could not work by artificial light, and that therefore she could only 
make one thaler and a-half (4s. 6d.) a-month at the most.'^ We were 
required to give our opinion, '^ whether the Widow B. is entirely un- 
able to earn her own livelihood, or to what extent this may be the case.^' 

We declared in our opinion : " is a woman aged fifty- 

six, who has formerly supported herself by cooking, but at present, 
from her ailing condition, she can only do light work. She complains 
' of almost every limb of her body,' and the suspicion thus aroused of 
its being a mere case of simulation, or of hysterical exaggeration of 
trifiing complaints, is raised to certainty by the results of the exami- 
nation. Excepting a remarkable baldness of the back part of the 
head, which confirms the statement of B., that she suffers much 
from headache, there is not one single objective symptom of disease, 
or anything anomalous whatever to be discovered about her. When 



S 13. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 205 

she states that her eyes are weak, and that she must therefore use 
glasses, she is no worse oflf than many other people of the same age. 
There is, therefore, no reason for supposing that B. is less fit for 
w^ork than she has formerly been, but rather that she is just as able 
to earn her own livelihood as any other woman of her station and 
age, which is certainly somewhat advanced. 

Case II. — Disputed Partial Ability to Earn a Livelihood. 

This was another case in which the parents had a tedious litiga- 
tion with their children, claiming support from them on the plea of 
being only able partially to maintain themselves, which the children 
disputed. The man was sixty-five years old, vigorous for his age, 
and free from general disease, excepting a running cuticular ulcer on 
each of his legs, which were both very red and (edematous. I found 
him plaiting straw, and sitting with his legs lying horizontal. He 
stated that he required generally to maintain this position, since the 
legs swelled when allowed to hang, and when he walked the whole 
of both lower extremities swelled and became painful, which was 
quite credible. He was therefore obliged to maintain a sitting 
posture more or less constantly, and all the less fitted to gain his 
living by the hard work of an ordinary labourer, his former employ- 
ment, as in this respect his already far advanced age was an addi- 
tional hinderance. I therefore decided, " that he is only in a position 
to earn a living by such easy kinds of work as can be carried on in a 
room and in the sitting posture, and that he is no longer fit for the 
ordinary employments of a labourer, his former occupation.'^ His 
wife was sixty-six years of age, but tolerably vigorous in spite of the 
usual failings of her age, diflBculty of moving and shortsightedness 
excepted. Her uterus was, however, prolapsed, and was retained 
by a pessary. I stated, in my opinion, that women with such a 
complaint are unable for any employment requiring severe bodily 
exertion, as that prevents the retention of the prolapsed organ. S. 
is therefore unfit for earning her livelihood by any labour of this 
character, such as carrying of wood or water, lifting and carrying of 
heavy baskets, fee, but is rather restricted to the easier female occu- 
pations of sewing, knitting, &c., none of which, however, she says 
she has learned. I did not require to estimate the influence this 
statement might have upon the decision of the Judge, and, from 
my own point of view, I gave it as my opinion that ''the 



206 § 13. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

parents 8. were only fit to maintain themselves partially by bodily 
labour.'^ 



Case III. — Asserted Unfitness to earn a Livelihood. 

As a proof of the shamelessness with which an inability to earn a 
liveUhood is often asserted before the Judge^ the following case of the 
plea of a married couple against the authorities of a foreign town 
may serve as an example. Both asserted that 'Hhey were unfit for 
labour^ and must even employ the services of another person for 
their ordinary household work.'' The husband was sixty years old, 
very lean, and had an old and quite replaceable double inguinal hernia, 
which might consequently be easily retained by a proper truss. He had 
no other objective ailment or infirmity that could be discovered, and, 
of course, in regard to the inquiry in hand, no value whatever could 
be attached to his purely subjective statement, that he suffered from 
'^ rheumatic complaints (!)/' The wife was blooming and robust, and 
yet, that she might have something to complain of, she declared that 
she had ** pains in her Umbs f I do not need to state the answer 
given by us after the results of this examination to the assertion 
that these people '^ required the assistance of a stranger to perform 
their household work/' 

Case IV. — Is this Person fit to learn a Trade, and if so, 

WHAT Trade? 

This question (which is of such frequent occurrence) turned up in 
a case of trusteeship, and was laid before me for my opinion. The 
ward was fourteen years old, and laboured imder ^'a stifi&iess and 
debility of the right arm, and weak eyes," and I had to state whether 
he was quite unfit to learn any trade, or for what trade he was still 
capable. There was a congenital semiparalysis of the muscles of the 
right arm, which prevented the boy from making every movement 
of the right arm with a proper degree of force. Many movements 
he could nevertheless execute with ease, and had not lost the use 
of his right hand. I therefore stated that the boy "was quite fit 
for any trade which does not require any great exertion of the right 
arm, such as a tailor or bookbinder. The weakness of his eyes is 
not considerable, and will be no hinderance in learning either of the 
trades mentioned." He was made a bookbinder. 



§ 13. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 207 

Case V. — ^Whether should this Man be a Bakee oe a Tin- 
smith ? 

I had to state to the Court of Trusteeship, '' Whether it was fitter 
for this ward to learn the trade of a baker than that of a tinsmith ?'* 
The boy, aged fifteen years, had a flat chest, and tubercular deposit 
in the apex of the right lung. According to his statement, during 
his fourteenth year, while commencing to learn the trade of a tin- 
smith, he had suffered much from the acid vapours which are con- 
stantly given off by the hydrochloric acid which the tinsmiths em- 
ploy in soldering. This fact, which is correct, was quite agreeable 
with his statement, that these vapours always made his breathing 
difficult and made him cough, and was therefore credible. Con- 
sidering the young man's decided tendency to consumption, and the 
fact that these injurious influences did not occur in the trade of a 
baker, I answered the questions put to me affirmatively. 

Case VI. — ^Plea op Suppoet foe Life, because of asseeted in- 
ability TO make a Livelihood, eesulting feom the Bite of 
A Dog. 

The journeyman flesher, D., had been bitten in both arms by a 
dog of his master's, five years previous to my medical examination 
of him ; he asserted that by the injuries he had received he had been 
rendered incapable '^ of using both his arms normally during all the 
remainder of his life, so that it was beyond his power to earn a 
livelihood, similarly to what would have been the case had his arms 
remained uninjured.^' The judicial queries put to me will be dis- 
covered further on. Li regard to the actual state of matters I found 
in the first place, certainly on both arms, that is, on the right arm 
and forearm, and on the left forearm and hand, but particularly on 
the right arm, numerous white and completely cicatrized scars, which 
might very probably be the marks of the bite of a dog. Both the 
right and the left arm, as well as the face, were covered with a ser- 
piginous eruption. Nevertheless, in spite of the scars and serpigi- 
nous patches tAe right arm and right hand were perfectly moveable, 
useful, and fitted for every kind of work. Not so, however, the left 
upper extremity. On the back of the wrist joint a long narrow 
white scar, which was not moveable, and showed, therefore, not only 



208 13. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

that the cuticukr coverings had been divided, but also the muscles 
and tendons lying beneath them. Also in the palm of the hand 
there was a similar scar with rounded angles. That the tendons of 
the fingers had been affected by this injury was proved by the con- 
traction of the tendons both of the middle- and of the ring-fingers, 
which D., as I satisfied myself, could neither open or close properly. 
" When the usefulness of the hand is thereby materially abridged, 
this is much more the case by the fact that the wrist itself has lost 
its mobility, and can be but very slightly, though still slightly, 
flexed and extended. On the right side of the back of the wrist 
there is a scab the size of a halfpenny, the remaining incrustation of 
a recently-healed sore, which from its present condition it is impos- 
sible to say whether it has been merely a serpiginous ulceration, or 
the result of an injury which has penetrated to the wrist-bones. The 
present condition of this hand is to be regarded as incurable and per- 
manent, since though the operation of tendo-section, which is in itself 
uncertain in its results, might possibly remedy the contraction of 
the tendons, yet the anchylosis of the wrist-joint must ever remain 
as inaccessible to any remedial procedure, as it is impossible for it to 
be removed by any purely natural process. Considering the me- 
chanical integrity of D.'s right hand, and the slight mobility still 
retained by his left one, he cannot be declared to be wholly unable to 
earn his livelihood by labour, since he is perfectly fit for many diffe- 
rent kinds of work. This is less the case, however, in regard to his 
own peculiar trade, which presupposes and requires not only bodily 
strength, but power and dexterity in both hands, and in both of these 
respects, as already related, the left hand of D. is much restricted.^' 
Accordingly I answered the queries put to me thus : — ad 1. "That 
the arms and hands of D. are not now in a normal condition, and that 
he is prevented from using the left hand as he would had it been 
uninjxu*ed. ad 2. That D. has not lost the power of providing his 
livelihood by the labour of his hands ; but that he certainly cannot 
follow out the trade of a flesher as he could have done had he re- 
remained uninjured, ad 3. That the restoration of the left hand is 
no longer possible, and that the existing partial incapacity for labour, 
as more particularly described above, particularly the incapacity for 
the trade of a flesher, will continue for the rest of his life/' 



§ 14. INJURIES, ETC. 209 

Case VII. — A sihilab case. — ^Asserted Incapacity por making 
A Livelihood, from being Run over. 

When, in the previous instance, the case of a distinct trade (that of 
a flesher) was specially brought before us for our opinion, so in this 
one, the absolute inability to earn a livelihood was asserted to be the 
result of an injury, and this plea was maintained in the subsequent 
action for damages. A workman raised an action against a wdl-to- 
do master fiesher, asserting that " in consequence of an injury to his 
chest and stifEness of his right arm from its having been broken and 
splintered by his having been run over by a conveyance, he was no 
longer in a condition to do any work, and was therefore unable to 
maintain himself and his family.'' We had to examine this man, aged 
fifty-two years, one year and a-half after the receipt of the injury. 
The fracture of the humerus, which, according to the hospital reports 
produced, had been a simple transverse one, was perfectly cured, as 
was to be expected. It was, however, remarkable that such a frac- 
ture had taken a period of fifteen weeks to heal, which the medical 
man in attendance attributed to the diminished '^ nervous vitality '' 
of the patient. This constitutional habitus of the otherwise flabby and 
weakly man also explained the peculiar consequences resulting from 
this fracture, for S— could not move the right hand and arm properly, 
nor use them with any strength; and there was no feigning in this. 
The arm was visibly thinner than the left, and the muscles so 
flabby that he could neither elevate the arm nor close the hand firmly 
and completely. "Consequently/' we stated, "S^ certainly cannot 
perform any hard labour with his right arm ; his ability to maintain 
himself is therefore much diminished. But as he is, nevertheless, 
otherwise quite healthy, and just fifty-two years old, it cannot be 
maintained that he is absolutely unable to gain a livelihood for him- 
self as he asserts, since he is still able to maintain himself by actmg 
as a messenger, a doorkeeper, or a rag-gatherer (his present occupa- 
tion), &c., though certainly more scantily than formerly." 

§ 14. Continuation. — 4. Injuries. — 5. Sexual Eelations. — 6. 
Disputed Mental Condition. — 7. Various Objects. 

Besides the objects already referred to, the medico-legal examina- 
tion of living persons may require to be undertaken for many differ- 

VOL. III. P 



208 13. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

that the cuticular coverings had been divided, but also the muscles 
and tendons lying beneath them. Also in the palm of the hand 
there was a similar scar with rounded angles. That the tendons of 
the fingers had been affected by this injury was proved by the con- 
traction of the tendons both of the middle- and of the ring-fingers, 
which D., as I satisfied myself, could neither open or close properly. 
" When the usefulness of the hand is thereby materially abridged, 
this is much more the case by the fact that the wrist itself has lost 
its mobility, and can be but very slightly, though still slightly, 
flexed and extended. On the right side of the back of the wrist 
there is a scab the size of a halfpenny, the remaining incrustation of 
a recently-healed sore, which from its present condition it is impos- 
sible to say whether it has been merely a serpiginous ulceration, or 
the result of an injury which has penetrated to the wrist-bones. The 
present condition of this hand is to be regarded as incurable and per- 
manent, since though the operation of tendo-section, which is in itself 
uncertain in its results, might possibly remedy the contraction of 
the tendons, yet the anchylosis of the wrist-joint must ever remain 
as inaccessible to any remedial procedure, as it is impossible for it to 
be removed by any purely natural process. Considering the me- 
chanical integrity of D.'s right hand, and the slight mobility still 
retained by his left one, he cannot be declared to be wholly unable to 
earn his liveHhood by labour, since he is perfectly fit for many diffe- 
rent kinds of work. This is less the case, however, in regard to his 
own peculiar trade, which presupposes and requires not only bodily 
strength, but power and dexterity in both hands, and in both of these 
respects, as already related, the left hand of D. is much restricted.^' 
Accordingly I answered the queries put to me thus : — ad 1. " That 
the arms and hands of D. are not now in a normal condition, and that 
he is prevented from using the left hand as he would had it been 
uninjured, ad 2. That D. has not lost the power of providing his 
livelihood by the labour of his hands; but that he certainly cannot 
follow out the trade of a flesher as he could have done had he re- 
remained uninjured, ad 3. That the restoration of the left hand is 
no longer possible, and that the existing partial incapacity for labour, 
as more particularly described above, particularly the incapacity for 
the trade of a flesher, will continue for the rest of his life/' 



5 15. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 211 



§ 15. Illustrative Cases. 
Case VIII. — Can a Man with Mutilated Toes walk Two Miles 

CONTINUOUSLY ? 

This was a case of the utmost importance for the defendant in an 
action for divorce ; he was a man moving in the first circles who was 
accused of the most abominable impurities, and was thus liable to a 
severe punishment. A farm-servant was implicated in the matter, 
having been an eye-witness of one of the deeds referred to, and his 
testimony was of the utmost importance. The defence, however, 
asserted, that this man^s feet were so mutilated that he could not 
" walk two miles without considerable interruptions/' So this ques- 
tion was referred to me for answer, and I stated that '^ the person 
exammed has many years ago lost from frost-bite the first or two 
first joints of most of the toes on both feet, this mutilation being 
most apparent on the left foot. The feet are thereby considerably 
crippled, and N. also states that he occasionally feels pain in them. 
It is evident that N., by the loss of his toes, has lost a very impor- 
tant support of the body in walking. The hinderance which he must 
thereby suffer is also increased by a peculiar, though not very rare, 
affection of his toe-nails, which are so overgrown that they are bent 
round like horns. On the boarded floor of a room I found by ex- 
periment that N. could walk tolerably well without any support. It 
is not, however, to be supposed that with these crippled feet — espe- 
cially (for the scene lay in the country) over an uneven, slippery 
miry, loamy, stony or sandy bottom, in short, under circumstances in 
which even walking with healthy feet is difficult — ^he could walk any 
long distance without requiring frequently to rest himself. I 
therefore answer the question put to me as follows : — ''N., from the 
mutilated condition of his toes, is not in a condition to walk two miles 
without considerable interruptions.^' 

Case IX.— Is N. N. a Jew? 

A young man of so&e education was placed at the bar, charged 
with perjury. Although at the time of his taking the oath he had 
stated himself to be "evangelical,^' and also, as was reported, to 
have previously once partaken of the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper, 

p2 



208 13. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

that the cuticular coverings had been divided, but also the muscles 
and tendons lying beneath them. Also in the palm of the hand 
there was a similar scar with rounded angles. That the tendons of 
the fingers had been aflfected by this injury was proved by the con- 
traction of the tendons both of the middle- and of the ring-fingers, 
which D., as I satisfied myself, could neither open or close properly. 
" When the usefulness of the hand is thereby materially abridged, 
this is muqh more the case by the fact that the wrist itself has lost 
its mobility, and can be but very slightly, though still slightly, 
flexed and extended. On the right side of the back of the wrist 
there is a scab the size of a halfpenny, the remaining incrustation of 
a recently-healed sore, which from its present condition it is impos- 
sible to say whether it has been merely a serpiginous ulceration, or 
the result of an injury which has penetrated to the wrist-bones. The 
present condition of this hand is to be regarded as incurable and per- 
manent, since though the operation of tendo-section, which is in itself 
uncertain in its results, might possibly remedy the contraction of 
the tendons, yet the anchylosis of the wrist-joint must ever remain 
as inaccessible to any remedial procedure, as it is impossible for it to 
be removed by any purely natural process. Considering the me- 
chanical integrity of D.'s right hand, and the slight mobility still 
retained by his left one, he cannot be declared to be wholly unable to 
earn his liveHhood by labour, since he is perfectly fit for many diffe- 
rent kinds of work. This is less the case, however, in regard to his 
own peculiar trade, which presupposes and requires not only bodily 
strength, but power and dexterity in both hands, and in both of these 
respects, as already related, the left hand of D. is much restricted.^' 
Accordingly I answered the queries put to me thus : — ad 1. "That 
the arms and hands of D. are not now in a normal condition, and that 
he is prevented from using the left hand as he would had it been 
uninjured, ad 2. That D. has not lost the power of providing his 
livelihood by the labour of his hands ; but that he certainly cannot 
follow out the trade of a flesher as he could have done had he re- 
remained uninjured, ad 3. That the restoration of the left hand is 
no longer possible, and that the existing partial incapacity for labour, 
as more particularly described above, particularly the incapacity for 
the trade of a flesher, will continue for the rest of his life.'' 



§ 14. INJURIES, ETC. 209 

Case VII. — ^A similar case. — ^Asserted Incapacitt for making 
A Livelihood, from being Run over. 

When, in the previous instance, the case of a distinct trade (that of 
a flesher) was specially brought before us for our opinion, so in this 
one, the absolute inability to earn a livelihood was asserted to be the 
result of an injury, and this plea was maintained in the subsequent 
action for damages. A workman raised an action against a wdl-to- 
do master flesher, asserting that " in consequence of an injury to his 
chest and stifEuess of his right arm from its having been broken and 
splintered by his having been run over by a conveyance, he was no 
longer in a condition to do any work, and was therefore unable to 
maintain himself and his family.'' We had to examine this man, aged 
fifty-two years, one year and a-half after the receipt of the injury. 
The fracture of the humerus, which, according to the hospital reports 
produced, had been a simple transverse one, was perfectly cured, as 
was to be expected. It was, however, remarkable that such a frac- 
ture had taken a period of fifteen weeks to heal, which the medical 
man in attendance attributed to the diminished " nervous vitality *' 
of the patient. This constitutional habitus of the otherwise flabby and 
weakly man also explained the peculiar consequences resulting from 
this fracture, for S — could not move the right hand and arm properly, 
nor use them with any strength; and there was no feigning in this. 
The arm was visibly thinner than the left, and the muscles so 
flabby that he could neither elevate the arm nor close the hand firmly 
and completely. *' Consequently/' we stated, '^ S — certaiuly cannot 
perform any hard labour with his right arm; his ability to maintain 
himself is therefore much diminished. But as he is, nevertheless, 
otherwise quite healthy, and just fifty-two years old, it cannot be 
maintained that he is absolutely unable to gain a livelihood for him- 
self as he asserts, since he is stiU able to maintain himself by acting 
as a messenger, a doorkeeper, or a rag-gatherer (his present occupa- 
tion), &c., though certainly more scantily than formerly." 

§ 14. CONTINTJATION. — 4. INJURIES. — 5. SeXUAL EeLATIONS. — 6. 

Disputed Mental Condition. — 7. Various Objects. 

Besides the objects already referred to, the medico-legal examina- 
tion of living persons may require to be undertaken for many differ- 

VOL. III. P 



208 13. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

that the cuticular coverings had been divided, but also the muscles 
and tendons lying beneath them. Also in the palm of the hand 
there was a similar scar with rounded angles. That the tendons of 
the fingers had been affected by this injury was proved by the con- 
traction of the tendons both of the middle- and of the ring-fingers, 
which D., as I satisfied myself, could neither open or close properly. 
" When the usefulness of the hand is thereby materially abridged, 
this is much more the case by the fact that the wrist itself has lost 
its mobility, and can be but very slightly, though still slightly, 
flexed and extended. On the right side of the back of the wrist 
there is a scab the size of a halfpenny, the remaining incrustation of 
a recently-healed sore, which from its present condition it is impos- 
sible to say whether it has been merely a serpiginous ulceration, or 
the result of an injury which has penetrated to the wrist-bones. The 
present condition of this hand is to be regarded as incurable and per- 
manent, since though the operation of tendo-section, which is in itself 
uncertain in its results, might possibly remedy the contraction of 
the tendons, yet the anchylosis of the wrist-joint must ever remain 
as inaccessible to any remedial procedure, as it is impossible for it to 
be removed by any purely natural process. Considering the me- 
chanical integrity of D.'s right hand, and the slight mobility still 
retained by his left one, he cannot be declared to be wholly unable to 
earn his livelihood by labour, since he is perfectly fit for many diffe- 
rent kinds of work. This is less the case, however, in regard to his 
own peculiar trade, which presupposes and requires not only bodily 
strength, but power and dexterity in both hands, and in both of these 
respects, as already related, the left hand of D. is much restricted.^' 
Accordingly I answered the queries put to me thus : — ad 1. "That 
the arms and hands of D. are not now in a normal condition, and that 
he is prevented from using the left hand as he would had it been 
uninjured, ad 2. That D. has not lost the power of providing his 
livelihood by the labour of his hands ; but that he certainly cannot 
follow out the trade of a flesher as he could have done had he re- 
remained uninjured, ad 3. That the restoration of the left hand is 
no longer possible, and that the existing partial incapacity for labour, 
as more particularly described above, particularly the incapacity for 
the trade of a flesher, will continue for the rest of his Ufe/' 



§ 14. INJURIES, ETC. 209 

Case VII. — A similar case. — ^Asseeted Incapacitt foe making 
A Livelihood, feom being Run ovee. 

When, in the previous instance, the case of a distinct trade (that of 
a flesher) was specially brought before us for our opinion, so in this 
one, the absolute inability to earn a livelihood was asserted to be the 
result of an injury, and this plea was mamtained in the subsequent 
action for damages. A workman raised an action against a wdl-to- 
do master flesher, asserting that " in consequence of an injury to his 
chest and stifEuess of his right arm from its having been broken and 
splintered by his having been run over by a conveyance, he was no 
longer in a condition to do any work, and was therefore unable to 
maintain himself and his family/' We had to examine this man, aged 
fifty-two years, one year and a-half after the receipt of the injury. 
The fracture of the humerus, which, according to the hospital reports 
produced, had been a simple transverse one, was perfectly cured, as 
was to be expected. It was, however, remarkable that such a frac- 
ture had taken a period of fifteen weeks to heal, which the medical 
man in attendance attributed to the diminished ^' nervous vitality '' 
of the patient. This constitutional habitus of the otherwise flabby and 
weakly man also explained the peculiar consequences resulting from 
this fracture, for S — could not move the right hand and arm properly, 
nor use them with any strength; and there was no feigning in this. 
The arm was visibly thinner than the left, and the muscles so 
flabby that he could neither elevate the arm nor close the hand firmly 
and completely. '' Consequently/' we stated, " S — certainly cannot 
perform any hard labour with his right arm; his ability to maintain 
himself is therefore much diminished. But as he is, nevertheless, 
otherwise quite healthy, and just fifty-two years old, it cannot be 
maintained that he is absolutely unable to gain a livelihood for him- 
self as he asserts, since he is still able to maintain himself by acting 
as a messenger, a doorkeeper, or a rag-gatherer (his present occupa- 
tion), &c., though certainly more scantily than formerly." 

§ 14. Continuation. — 4. Injueies. — 5. Sexual Eelations. — 6. 
Disputed Mental Condition. — 7. Vabious Objects. 

Besides the objects already referred to, the medico-legal examina- 
tion of living persons may require to be undertaken for many diflfer- 
voL. ni. P 



208 13. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

that the cuticular coverings had been divided, but also the muscles 
and tendons lying beneath them. Also in the palm of the hand 
there was a similar scar with rounded angles. That the tendons of 
the fingers had been affected by this injury was proved by the con- 
traction of the tendons both of the middle- and of the ring-fingers, 
which D., as I satisfied myself, could neither open or close properly. 
" When the usefulness of the hand is thereby materially abridged, 
this is much more the case by the fact that the wrist itself has lost 
its mobility, and can be but very slightly, though still slightly, 
flexed and extended. On the right side of the back of the wrist 
there is a scab the size of a halfpenny, the remaining incrustation of 
a recently-healed sore, which from its present condition it is impos- 
sible to say whether it has been merely a serpiginous ulceration, or 
the result of an injury which has penetrated to the wrist-bones. The 
present condition of this hand is to be regarded as incurable and per- 
manent, since though the operation of tendo-section, which is in itself 
uncertain in its results, might possibly remedy the contraction of 
the tendons, yet the anchylosis of the wrist-joint must ever remain 
as inaccessible to any remedial procedure, as it is impossible for it to 
be removed by any purely natural process. Considering the me- 
chanical integrity of D.^s right hand, and the slight mobility still 
retained by his left one, he cannot be declared to be wholly unable to 
earn his liveHhood by labour, since he is perfectly fit for many diffe- 
rent kinds of work. This is less the case, however, in regard to his 
own peculiar trade, which presupposes and requires not only bodily 
strength, but power and dexterity in both hands, and in both of these 
respects, as already related, the left hand of D. is much restricted.^' 
Accordingly I answered the queries put to me thus : — ad 1. " That 
the arms and hands of D. are not now in a normal condition, and that 
he is prevented from using the left hand as he would had it been 
uninjured, ad 2. That D. has not lost the power of providing his 
livelihood by the labour of his hands ; but that he certainly cannot 
follow out the trade of a flesher as he could have done had he re- 
remained uninjured, ad 3. That the restoration of the left hand is 
no longer possible, and that the existing partial incapacity for labour, 
as more particularly described above, particularly the incapacity for 
the trade of a flesher, will continue for the rest of his life/^ 



§ 14. INJURIES, ETC. 209 

Case VII. — ^A sihilab case. — ^Asserted Incapacitt foe making 
A Livelihood, pbom being Run ovee. 

When, in the previous instance, the case of a distinct trade (that of 
a flesher) was specially brought before us for our opinion, so in this 
one, the absolute inability to earn a livelihood was asserted to be the 
result of an injury, and this plea was maintained in the subsequent 
action for damages. A workman raised an action against a wdl-to- 
do master flesher, asserting that ^' in consequence of an injury to his 
chest and stiffiiess of his right arm from its having been broken and 
splintered by his having been run over by a conveyance, he was no 
longer in a condition to do any work, and was therefore unable to 
maintain himself and his family/' We had to examine this man, aged 
fifty-two years, one year and a-half after the receipt of the injury. 
The fracture of the humerus, which, according to the hospital reports 
produced, had been a simple transverse one, was perfectly cured, as 
was to be expected. It was, however, remarkable that such a frac- 
ture had taken a period of fifteen weeks to heal, which the medical 
man in attendance attributed to the diminished " nervous vitality " 
of the patient. This constitutional habitus of the otherwise flabby and 
weakly man also explained the peculiar consequences resulting from 
this fracture, for S — could not move the right hand and arm properly, 
nor use them with any strength; and there was no feigning in this. 
The arm was visibly thinner than the left, and the muscles so 
flabby that he could neither elevate the arm nor close the hand firmly 
and completely. ''Consequently," we stated, "S — certainly cannot 
perform any hard labour with his right arm; his ability to maintain 
himself is therefore much diminished. But as he is, nevertheless, 
otherwise quite healthy, and just fifty-two years old, it cannot be 
maintained that he is absolutely unable to gain a livelihood for him- 
self as he asserts, since he is still able to maintain himself by acting 
as a messenger, a doorkeeper, or a rag-gatherer (his present occupa- 
tion), &c., though certainly more scantily than formerly." 

§ 14. Continuation. — 4. Injuries. — 5. Sexual Eelations. — 6. 
Disputed Mental Condition. — 7. Vabious Objects. 

Besides the objects already referred to, the medico-legal examina- 
tion of living persons may require to be undertaken for many difier- 
voL. ni. r 



218 OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE. 

constantly reminded of his duty as an official, and his responsibility 
for the truth and authenticity of his certificate. For this end I 
ordain, that henceforth the certificate and written opinion of the 
medical official shall always contain : — 

1. A statement of the reason why a medical certificate is required, 
the object for which it is to be employed, and the Board before which 
it is to be laid. 

2. The statement of the patient or his relatives as to his condition. 

3. And separate from the statement under 2, the personal obser^ 
vationsofthe certifier as to the condition of the patient. 

4. The actual morbid phenomena observed. 

5. A scientifically-reasoned decision as to the disease, thepatienfs 
fitness for transport or imprisonment, or any other question that may 
be in hand. 

6. The attestation, upon oath, that the communications made by 
the patient or his relatives (ad 2), has been correctly embodied in the 
certificate ; that the personal observations of the certify (ad 3 and 
4) are all consistent with truth, and that the opinion given is based 
upon the personal observations of the certifier according to the best of 
his knowledge. 

Moreover, the certificate must be dated and signed in full, and 
must be authenticated by the offi^cial designation of the certifier, and 
by his seal of office. And Government has to take care that the medi- 
cal ofiicials in each district are required to observe this form, to renew 
this notice yearly, and on its part strictly to observe that this form is 
fully adhered to. In order to enable Government to do this, the 
Minister of Justice is to notify to all Courts of Law to communicate to 
their respective police authorities an attested copy of every medical 
certificate coming before them, which is objected to by the parties 
opposing, or in which the Court or the public prosecutor shall discover 
any incompleteness or superficiality, or an omission of any of the 
points above specially referred to, or any error. The Government 
must then carefully examine these as well as every other medical cer* 
tificate which shall reach them in any other way, and must strictly 
punish every offence against the foregoing resolutions ; if necessary, the 
opinion of the Medical College of the province must be requested, 
and a report must be made to me in regard to the commencement of 
the disciplinary investigation. 

Since complaints of the untrustworthiness of medical certificates 
are chiefly made in cases in which the object of the medical exami- 



OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE, 219 

nation has been to ascertain tie possibility of carrying out a punitory 
or debtorsAip imprisonment, and as I have frequently observed that 
medical officers permit themselves in such cases to be influenced by a 
sympathy altogether inadmissible, or place themselves in the position 
of an ordinary medical attendant, who has to prescribe for his patient, 
living in freedom, the most suitable mode ofUfe, therefore I have to 
request that the Government in each district shall take care that its 
medical officers are warned against committing any such blunders. 
In such cases the medical officers frequently assume that the mere 
probability of an aggravation of the state of health of the person 
arrested, by the deprivation of his freedom, is a sufficient reason for 
temporarily postponing the pimitory or debtorship imprisonment. 
This is a perfectly erroneous idea. Imprisonment almost always pro- 
duces some mental depress^ion, and also similarly affects the bodily 
functions where the prisoner is not particularly strong or perfectly 
healthy, preexisting disease being thus almost always aggravated. 
But this is no reason why pvmtory or debtorship imprisonment should 
not be carried out ; moreover, as a prisoner he will be provided with 
medical attendance, and he cannot, therefore, be declared to be unfit 
to undergo his punishment. The medical officer can only plead for 
deferring the punishment, 8fc., when, after a conscientious examina- 
tion of the condition of the person arrested, he is convinced that the 
carrying out of the imprisonment would be attended with immediate, 
considerable, and irremediable danger to his health and life, and 
when he has attained this conviction from the morbid phenomena 
observed by himself, and which he is in a position to support by 
scientific reasons. Any other conception of the duty of a medical 
officer deprives the punishment of its gravity, paralyses the arm of 
justice, and cannot therefore be justified. This is earnestly commended 
to the consideration of all medical officers. 

(Signed) v. Eaumeb, 
Minister for Keligious, Educational, and Medical Affairs. 
Berlin, 20th January, 1853. 

To all the Provincial Governments. 

In the CntcuLAit Missive of the same Ministry, dated 11th 
February, 1856, after directing that the foregoing regulations shall 
be maintained in force, it is further ordained, " that for the future 
the certificate referred to, besides the complete date of its execution, 
shall also contain the place and day when the medical examination 



220 § 16. OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE. 

took place, and tAai the Missive (given above) of date 20^A of 
January, 1853^ shall be aUo afpplicahle to those certificates granted 
by medical officials in their capacity of private physicians, and to be 
used before Courts of Law. 

GmcuLAB Bescbipt of the same Ministry^ dated 13th March^ 
1822 .• — The Government is herely commissioned to forbid all district 
physicians a/nd surgeons in its department, without special permission 
of this ministry, to publish their judicial reports before the lapse of five 
years from thm' promulgation, even with the omission of the names 
of places and people. 

CiECULAE Rbscbipt OP THE SAME MINISTRY, dated 3rd Decern- 
ber, 1850 : — The custom which manyforensicphysiciam have of milking 
more use than is absolute^ necessary of Latin and Greek terms in draw- 
ing up their reports in regard to corporal injuries, disputed mental 
conditions, 8fc., has given great offence, particularly to the recently- 
introduced public Courts of Law, because these reports a/re thereby less 
easily understood by the public at large, and particularly by the Jury, 
On the other hand, it is not to be denied that a complete omission of 
the use of words of foreign extraction would imjv/re the scientific com- 
pleteness of the report, as in some instances the vernacular expression or 
any circumlocutory description of the thing would not so distinctly mark 
what it is, as the word which science has adopted from a foreign 
language. I am therefore forced to recommiend, through the Provin- 
cial Governments a/nd the President of Police here, that all forensic 
physicians should endeavour to hit the happy medium, which consists 
in this — that foreign words should not be employed for things which 
are Just as correctly or better expressed in the vernacular, while in 
the opposite case the foreign word is to be retained, and in certain 
cases to obviate any doubt that may arise from the use of the vernacular 
expression, the Latin or Greek word is to be added within 
brackets. 

For other directions and regulations in regard to the medical cer- 
tificate, its probative value, necessity for its being stamped, &c., Vide 
V. Sonne und Simon, op, cit. I. p. 239, II. p. 638. 

§ 16. General. 

The same general rules and forms which medical jurists are required 
to attend to in their written or oral communications in regard to 
objects examined by them, or in the answering of questions put to 



§ 16. OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE. 221 

them by the Judge, hold good alike for the shortest certificate and 
the most detailed report, for all evidence of httle apparent conse- 
quence, as well as for those important and consequential reasoned 
opinions in regard to disputed mental conditions and cases of 
medico-legal dissections ; the former of these will be specially con- 
sidered by-and-by (§ 57), the latter has already been so (General 
Division, § 52, Vol. I.). At the investigations which serve for the 
basis of these two kinds of reports, the legal officials are, according 
to Prussian law, required to be present always and without excep- 
tion at the inspection and dissection of dead bodies, at the investiga- 
tion of disputed mental conditions in civil cases the legal official 
is frequently, and in criminal cases generally, not present. All other 
investigations are carried out by the physician alone, without the 
presence of the Judge, and he subsequently gives in his report (cer- 
tificate). The form which must be foUowed by the Prussian 
forensic physician in drawing up these documents, is contained in the 
ministerial missive abeadygiven (p. 217, Vol. III.), and similar regula- 
tions also exist in every other German country. In the regulative 
missive nothing is expressly stated (consequently the reverse is not 
prescribed), in regard to what, from my own experience, I can 
afiBrm to be extremely judicious, and by which the forensic physician 
wiU be saved much trouble. I refer to the advice to grant official 
certificates only upon a requisition &om judicial, police, government, or 
other ruling Boards, and never on the request of the party concerned 
or his relatives, &c. Whoever applies personally to tlwe physician 
for a certificate, surprises the physician ; but I have to repeat {Fide 
§ 6), that it is much more conducive to the attainment of the end 
that the physician should surprise the party stated to be sick. This 
method of never privately giving an official medical certificate, has 
also this important advantage, that when the forensic physician has 
waited for the official requisition, he does not hand over his certifi- 
cate or report to the party concerned, but to the Board requiring it, 
by which he is saved much trouble, and many unpleasant scenes, 
should it be unfavourable to the party concerned, as must so often 
be the case. In those other cases, of such frequent occurrence, in 
which the person to be examined presents himself to the forensic 
physician for that purpose, provided with an official order, in order 
to extort a certificate brevi manu, it is advisable to refuse to grant 
it, when what he requires cannot be conscientiously certified of him, 
e.^. that he is too ill to suffer imprisonment, that he is incapable of 



222 $ 16. OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE. 

procreating, that he is qualified for a pension in his branch of ser- 
vice, &c. Further steps are open to the party concerned. The 
granting of certificates is always, but especially in an extensive 
medico-legal practice in large towns and well-peopled districts, a 
most unpleasant and hazardous task, which inexperienced persons 
and those who know nothing about it would scarcely imagine. The 
forensic physician cannot conceal from himself that in every witness 
brought forward he will, without exception, find a foe ! In civil 
cases it is the opposing party who perhaps loses his case, because 
the medical certificate was contrary to his statement; in criminal 
cases it is at one time the public prosecutor, at another the advocate 
for the defence, according as the physician has been compelled to 
give his evidence for or against the party accused. Again, in a case 
of a report as to the medical or corporeal fitness of a man to undergo 
a punitory or debtorship imprisonment, the last hope of the party con- 
cerned, after perhaps years of delay, and every other attempt to escape 
has proved vain, is 4b*ected towards obtaining a favourable medical 
certificate ! But this danger can only be avoided when the forensic 
physician proceeds to his task fearless, upright, sternly incorruptible, 
and true to his conscience and his oath of oflBce. Truly it wffl not 
fail, that in one case the interest of the party concerned, in another 
that of some colleague will be injured, and perhaps some friendship 
alienated, which had been heretofore highly valued. In - smaller 
places, too, it will happen that by a single unfavourable certificate 
the forensic physician may raise up influential opposition among the 
public, and injure his private practice ; but in time this loss will be 
repaired, for qualities such as those mentioned will fortunately in all 
times and places command public respect, and — it is no slight 
reward to be able to lie down to rest every night with an unbur- 
dened conscience ! 

I hold myself justified in supposing, that insuflBciency of the 
medical— less probably of the ofllcial medical— certificate, so often 
complained of by judicial and other government Boards, is not 
based so much in tendencies opposed to those just commended, as in 
that humanity to which they are in duty bound by their position as 
physicians, which is their ornament as such, and is rightly prized in 
other circumstances by the non-professional public. But that 
humanity, which to favour a man tells only half the truth in an 
oflBcial' medical certificate, suppressing something in one case, and in 
another painting a supposition in too brilliant colours^ is a mistaken 



§ 16. OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE. 223 

philanthropy, as is at once evident from a consideration of the facts. 
For though a physician at the sick bed has only one object to care 
for, the possible restoration of the patient nnder his care, an interest 
which is as it were separate from all the rest of the world, yet 
when engaged in any oflBcial investigation, he has always and 
without exception, a twofold interest before his eyes, the parts of 
which are opposed to each other ; in civil cases, there are the interests 
of the pursuer and of the defender; in criminal cases, there are 
those of the accused and the public welfare and morals ; in govern- 
ment matters there are the interests of a public officer, of his col- 
leagues, and of the public service. It may be very difficult for the 
humane physician to recommend for a pension an officer, who, from 
his long and apparently incurable disease must neglect his duty, and 
who yet with his wife and children depends upon the emoluments 
derived from its discharge, but true humanity will also have regard 
to the substitute and his family, who have the same claims that the 
man in office has, whose duty he has for long performed unrewarded. 
The humane physician will not willingly testify, contrary to the in- 
terest of the culprit and his family, that he is capable of undergoing, 
without injury to his health, a punitory imprisonment of many years' 
duration ; but true humanity will never forget to give due weight 
to the interest of the person mutilated by the culprit, by severe inju- 
ries, or otherwise. It certainly does seem inhuman by an official 
certificate to cause a man to be torn from the bosom of his family and 
lodged in prison for debt, when a few strokes of the physician's pen 
would prevent it, but true humanity will also think of those other 
families reduced to beggary by the light-minded debtor. So let the 
official, as well as the non-official physician, be humane, but let them 
be so in the true sense of the word, and not at the expense of their 
conscience and the bidding of a false philanthropy. 

In all his official reports and certificates, as well as in every act of 
his official life, the forensic physician must ever preserve inviolable 
the golden rule, rie sutor, &c. It is easy to understand why forensic 
physicians so frequently, in their reports concerning the living, but 
especially concerning the dead, wander into purely legal matters, 
bring forward arguments based on the criminal law, or advance rea- 
sons for or against the guilt of the accused, by casting a single glance 
at the newest and most recent German hand-books of the science. 
(The French and English books err much less, if at all, in this 
respect). Then we find upon the titlepage a physician named as the 



224 § 17. OF THE ORAL STATEMENT AT TRIAL. 

author, and we cannot conceal our astonishment when we find whole 
chapters filled with the details ^' as to matters of law and of police/' 
as to ^^ dolus and culpa^^ as to '^the difference between a crime and 
an offence/' as to '' proof by experts/' &c. &c. ! Such authors, 
however, prove at once by these statements alone, that they 
know nothing about medico-legal practice, and have, conse- 
quently, no medico-legal experience whatever, for otherwise they 
would know that the medico-legal practitioner is never required to 
state his opinion as to any purely judicial matter, and if he should 
err in this respect, he will be at once called to order by the judge. 
For as the '^ Begolations of the Criminal Court" say the physician is 
only required to be ''an expert in medicine," a professional witness^ 
who shall give to the Judge in respect of his own science, and it 
alone, the necessary explanations in regard to any case which may 
belong to it. The Judge holds that the physician is incapable of 
giving an opinion in judicial matters, and rightly bo, just as he him- 
self is in regard to medical matters. And the authors of the text- 
books above referred to would have the same right to express their 
surprise, should the Judge in any given case enter upon a discussion 
as to the nature of inflammation, gangrene, &c. I have therefore 
only urgently to advise a physician before the court, not to enter 
upon any such matters of law in their written or oral reports or 
opinions, if they wish to save themselves the shame, which certainly 
awaits them, of hearing the Judge call to th^n in the most polite cir- 
cumlocutory phraseology, " You know nothing about that, and I have 
not asked you about it " I Prom my own repeated experience, I can 
state with certainty, that even the mere interpretation of passages of 
the statutes bearing on the case, which the forensic physician cannot 
always avoid giving in his opinion, if he wishes to be distinctly un- 
derstood, as for instance, in regard to the meaning to be attached to 
the expression ''unfit for work," in § 192 of the penal code, &c., 
is v^ ill taken by many Judges ; so jealous are they of maintaining 
their position as opposed to that of the physician. Therefore re- 
member : ne eutor ! 

§ 17. Of the Opinion given orally at the time of Trial. 

Since the introduction of the public and oral method of proce- 
dure in the events of law, the forensic physician, even after deliver- 
ing a written report upon the case, is called upon once more to state 



§ 17. OF THE ORAL STATEMENT AT TRIAL. 225 

his opinion orally before the college of judges or the jury-court, 
just as happens in all those cases in which no previous written report 
has been considered necessary by the court. And it is no very easy 
task, clearly and satisfactorily to lay down orally in public, the 
scientific reasons and proofs in regard to a perhaps somewhat com- 
plicated case, particularly as most physicians are not accustomed to 
express their thoughts exhaustively vivd voce. In general, the 
principles laid down in the foregoing paragraphs, in regard to the 
written, wiU be also applicable to the oral reports. A man mmt 
Sjpeak as shortly and as distinctly as jpossible, and so as to he easily 
understood {by the non^prqfessional audience), and he will not fail to 
produce a proper effect upon the Judge and the jury. But care 
must be taken not to attempt to attain this end in any other way 
than by a mere statement of facts. When physicians, as has hap- 
pened, permit themselves to be so carried away as to claim the com- 
passion of the jury for the accused, or, on the contrary, to invoke their 
severity against the perpetrators of the ^^ atrocious deed,^' or the 
'^ crime deserving the scorn of all humanity,^' &c. ; when they so 
completely mistake their position as simple experts, then they can- 
not wonder at what will indubitably happen, that before the whole 
assembled public they will receive a severe rebuke, and be warned 
back within their own limits, either by the president of the court, 
the public prosecutor, or the advocate for the defence. 

A common fault is obscurity in the general view of the case, or at 
least in its oratorical demonstration, particularly as evidenced in the 
constant employment of words of foreign extraction and technical ex- 
pressions. How often have I heard physicians talking to the Judge and 
jury of ^' excited sensibility, reflex movements, coma, idiopathic,^^ &c. 
&c., without for one instant considering that they were using words and 
expressions wholly unintelligible to unprofessional parties. In such a 
case, when perhaps three or four medical men are summoned to a 
trial as experts, even an able and superior physician will find himseK 
outflanked by some subordinate professional witness or surgeon, and 
his contrary opinion unjustly accepted, only perhaps because it was 
expressed clearly, shortly, and simply in the vernacular, and was 
thus easily comprehended by the jury. Though I need not repeat 
what has been already said in the foregoing paragraphs in regard to 
the medical opinion, yet I must still refer to one point in regard to the 
oral statement of opinion which here must not be left unregarded. I 
refer to the respect due to those professional colleagues who may 
VOL, in. q 



226 § 18. OF FALSE SCIENTIFIC CERTIFICATES. 

also happen to be summoned as experts in any given ease. In regard 
to this, I myself, during my frequent appearances before the courts 
have only too often, alas ! seen serious offences committed. A. may 
have quite a different opinion in the matter from B. or C, and he is 
bound by his conscience and his oath to state it freely and openly, 
and to support it by scientific reasons. But this must never be done 
with any display of malicious mockery against his dissenting col- 
leagues, whether by the older against the younger, the man of renown 
against the man of no repute, and the opportunity of this most 
unfitting occasion must never be taken for giving vent to long- felt 
unfriendly feelings. Since in this also, as well as ru every other part 
of the medical life, a physician can only lay claim to public respect, 
when he respects himself.* 

§ 18. Of False Scientific Certificates. 

It is a most distressrug proof of the average measure of confidence 
reposed by the courts and governing boards in medical certificates as 
a whole, that we find the new penal code necessitated to introduce a 
clause threatening punishment as a warning against false scientific 
certificates. § 257, already quoted, not only requires the public 
prosecutor (in Prussia) to take action ru any suspicious case, but it 
gives occasion to any pubhc board, life assurance society, or private 
individual to bring forward an accusation against the granter of any 
certificate that may seem to them to be suspicious. Unfortunately, 
since the pubUcation of the penal code, a complete series of such 
cases have come before me for revision, as is shown by the selection 
from them which shall be given presently. Especially in large 
towns, in which the present constitution of the medical profession is 
such that there is never any want of needy adventurers in the lower 
ranks of physic, who are not too nice in choosing between their con- 
science and their bodily wants, there will never be any deficiency of 
such repulsive and difficult tasks for the forensic physician, wholly 
independent of those which may arise from the false humanity of the 
best and kindest of medical men which is everywhere to be found, 
and has been already animadverted against. Repulsive — because if 
any actual offence has been committed in the granting of the certi- 
ficate, the forensic physician has only to choose between impeaching 
his colleague with ignorance, or with an intentional error, which 

* On the Revision of the Opinion, and the Sequence of Professional 
Courts, vide Vol. I. Gen. Div., § 54, p. 233, 



§ 19. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 227 

brings him under the talons of the law. DifBcult — ^because it must 
be acknowledged that the object of investigation at the time of the 
granting of the certificate was different from what it was when sub- 
sequently examined by the forensic physician, which of course may 
make a considerable difference in deciding as to the case, not only in 
acute bat even in chronic diseases. It is much more difficult, too, 
when the forensic physician is unable personally to examine the 
person referred to, but has to rely solely upon documentary evidence, 
the statements of the accused medical man, and of the unprofessional 
attendants on the patient, &c. To this must be added, that when 
the case is not all too obvious, it will be almost impossible for the 
revising physician to prove that the accused has act^ ^' contrary to 
better knowledge/' for where is the measure of that knowledge? 
Here, then, we come upon a circtimstance which considerably lessens 
the harshness of the penal clause, for the parties accused of falsely 
granting certificates and for their defenders; and to this may be 
added another circumstance, which I have learned from experience, 
I mean the various opinions held by the different legal boards in 
regard to the interpretation of the statute, an opinion which is often 
very favourable to the accused, and according to which I myself 
have seen physicians acquitted (Cases XII. and XIII.) who had 
granted certificates to pretended patients, whom they had never 
even once seen. On the whole, therefore, the general effect of these 
penal clauses is practically somewhat illusory, and only effectual by 
way of warning. 

§ 19. Illustrative Cases. 
Case XII. — ^Pretended Eheumatic Fever, has it been falsely 

CERTIFIED ? 

The practising physician. Dr. X., on the 12th of December, had 
granted a certificate to a certain Mrs. W., a woman of very ill repute, 
and who had been often punished, who kept a small tavern, stating 
that ^^ she is suffering from rheumatic fever and rheumatic swelling 
of the feet, and cannot therefore appear before the court to-day.^' 
The pubUc prosecutor was induced by many suspicious circumstances 
to regard this certificate as '' false,'^ and set forth contrary to better 
knowledge, and to base an accusation upon § 267. At the time of 
trial both of the accused appeared at the bar. Dr. X. stated that he 
had seen the woman W. on the eleventh of December in the condi- 
tion certified, that on the twelfth she had sent her maid-servant with 

a2 



228 § 19. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

a note and one ahiUing {sic I) to him, and that he had granted the 
certificate on the faith of the servant's description of her condition 
on that day. His private journal was produced during the trial. 
But it rather increased than allayed the suspicions, since many 
ill^ble figures were entered in it with different inks. During the 
course of the trial, he explained in regard to the honorarium received 
by him from his fellow-culprit at the bar, that he frequently took his 
meals with her, and thus squared off his account (! !) Finally, it 
was distinctly ascertained that the woman W. had gone out of her 
house on the evening of the twelfih of December. The court inter- 
preted the clause of the statute so that the certificate must be 
regarded as '* actually false,'^ and my opinion was asked in regard 
to it. I stated that a certificate must always be regarded as actually 
false, when it was not written out in the presence of the patient, or 
at least on the same day on which the physician had seen him. The 
state of the patient, as seemed here to have been the case, might 
be totally different on the following day, and in acute diseases he 
might even be dead the next day, and in such a case if the physician 
were to transfer the condition of the one day to the day next fol- 
lowing, he would certify that the deceased was labouring under 
such a disease, which would certainly be '^ actually false.^' Upon 
this the public prosecutor moved that Dr. X. be sentenced to four, 
and the woman W. to two months^ imprisonment. The court, how- 
ever, demanded that the public prosecutor should prove that the 
woman W. did n^t labour under the disease certified on the twelfth 
of December, and as of course this could not be done, both culprits 
were acquitted! Certainly a most interesting contribution to the 
efficiency of § 257 ! 

Case XIII. — Pretended Apoplectic Attack, has it been 

FALSELY certified? 

This case, both in its treatment and result, was precisely similar 
to the previous one. On the 26th of January a homoeopath certified 
that the host of a small beer and brandy shop " is lying ill in bed, 
that he has had a shock of apoplexy, and therefore cannot appear in 
court to-day.'^ In this case, being promptly requested, I was able 
to examine the ^' patient^' at once, and I found him on the evening 
of the 26th going about his shop smoking a pipe, and perfectly 
healthy! Nevertheless, the physician accused was acquitted, be- 



§ 19. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 229 

cause the court was not convinced of his mala fides , although it was 
distinctly ascertained that he had not seen the ''patient^^ on the 
26th at all, but only two days previously. 

Case XIV. — Whethee Fevee has been falsely ceetified? 

This was another host of a brandy shop, who, instead of appearing 
in court at a trial, put in a certificate from a surgeon testifying that 
he was feverish, confined to bed, and could not leave his room. On 
the second day subsequently I found N. N. certainly lying in bed 
and slightly feverish (pulse 92), perspiring gently, and with a dirty 
tongue. I stated that although the catarrhal complaint of N. was 
unimportant, yet 1 could not declare that the day before yesterday 
he must have been in a fit condition to leave his bed and his room, 
and to appear in court, and this all the more that his statement that 
he had been abeady four days iU, was by no means improbable. 
Hereupon the pubUc prosecutor dropped the case. 

Case XV. — Whethee Ieeesponsibility at the moment of com- 
mitting Suicide has been falsely ceetified ? 

This was a very pecuUar case, and all the more difficult that it 
had reference to an attempt to determine the mental condition of a 
man at the moment when he cut short his life by a pistol-shot, by 
investigating the medical certificate bearing upon it, and that upon the 
result of this investigation the means of the survivors materially de- 
pended. In this case, the Judge charged with the investigation 
expressly referred to § 257 of the penal code ( Vide p. 217, Vol. III.), 
and a question relating to it was referred to us. A man very well- 
known in Berlin, Councillor E., had shot himself with a pistol on 
the 27th of June, 18 — , during an investigation into the revenue 
department, of which he was the accountant, and which he had de- 
frauded to the amount of more than 15,000 thalers (£2,250). His 
widow was a member of two of our widow^s fund associations, and in 
at least one of them, she required in order to obtain the full amount 
of her pension, in case of the suicide of the husband, a medical cer- 
tificate of irresponsibility at the time the deed was committed. Such 
a certificate was granted on the 1st of July, by ihe (now deceased) 
Dr. L., who had been the family physician for thirty years. In it 
he stated that for many years E. had suffered from unusual irrita- 



230 § 19. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

bility, had been almost constantly in a greatly excited condition, and 
that this at last had passed into a state of frenzy bordering npon in- 
sanity, which conld done account for the death ; wherefore Dr. L. 
stated it to be his conviction, 'Hhat the deceased at the time when 
he destroyed himself was in an irresponsible condition/' 

^'Councillor E/' we stated in our report, ''was a man largely en- 
gaged in business, particularly in revenue matters, graced with many 
distinctions, titles, and orders, and up to the last moment of his life, 
to which we shall presently refer, no one had ever doubted the per- 
fect integrity of his understanding. How skilfully and adroitly he 
had concealed the large deficiency which he had indubitably gra- 
dually made during the course of many years, is evident from the 
deposition of the supervisor of the revenue. Privy Councillor N., and 
this conduct is by no means favourable to the idea of mental de- 
rangement. That E. was prepared for a final discovery of his deceit, 
and, like so many other similar criminals, may have determined 
voluntarily to put an end to his life when the dreaded moment should 
arrive, appears probable from the fact that he had caused a pair of 
pocket-pistols, which had been in his possession since 1848, to be 
repaired four weeks previous to his death. From a change in the 
parties acting as inspectors the dreaded moment drew near. E. 
sought in vain to postpone the investigation which had been an- 
nounced to him, and which was commenced at the hour appointed. 
At this moment Privy Councillor N. found him at work at his writ- 
ing-table, smoking a cigar, apparently in his usual frame of mind, 
and the preparations for the investigation into the revenue depart- 
ment were formally commenced. The second inspector. Privy Coun- 
cillor J., found him during the investigation calm and unrufQed just as 
he had always known him. Very sUly, he knew he had to produce a 
certain sum which was not at hand as it ought to have been, and with 
the excuse that he would fetch the sum wanted, which he pretended 
to have left in an adjoining apartment, he had gone off with an 'at 
your command' — ^never to return. The lifeless body was found lying 
shot in one of the adjoining rooms. Privy Councillor J. is convinced 
that E., at the moment he committed the deed, acted with ' perfect de- 
hberation,' since he had previously removed part of his dress, and 
placed it on the table in a certain order. Privy Councillor T. makes 
II precisely similar assertion in regard to the latter hours of E/s life, 
which he had spent along with him in the council on the very even- 
ing of the suicide, that E. was then in the complete possession of all 



§ 19. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 231 

his faculties. Finally, the evidence of one who had been an acquain- 
tance of E.'s for thirty years deserves some attention ; he had known 
him to be a vain, ambitious, and very violent man, but he could never 
believe in the possibility of his becoming mentally deranged. Even 
the deceased's own wife and daughter speak indeed of his proud and 
passionate temperament, but do not go so far in their judicial ex- 
amination as to assume the existence of mental derangement at the 
moment of committing the deed. Accordingly, neither in the facts 
contained in the evidence, nor in the psychological combinations of 
the whole case, is there the slightest reason for assuming mental de- 
rangement, and the irresponsible condition thereby produced, to have 
existed as a motive for the commission of suicide by E. All that 
Dr. L. has stated in regard to the temperament and character of the 
deceased, his irritability and nervous condition, the actual correctness 
of which is fully confirmed by other witnesses and acquaintances, by 
no means justifies of itself the conclusion as to a momentary excite- 
ment ' bordering upon insanity.' Such a condition of the nervous sys- 
tem may indeed lead to mental disease, just as, e, g., a scrophulous 
condition of the body may indeed lead to pulmonary consumption. 
But as it would be illogical to argue that any one was consumptive, 
because it was well known that he had always been scrophulous, just 
as little dare a physician assume from the mere disposition, as evinced 
by an irritable temperament, the actual occurrence of mental derange- 
ment, which can only be shown to exist by a proper consideration of 
all the circumstances attendant on the deed. In the case before us 
these were so striking, — ^the motive to the suicide, dread of disgrace, 
and the punishment of a guilty consciousness ; and every trace of any 
actual disposition to mental derangement in the previous life so evidently 
completely absent, the demeanour of E. up to the moment of the 
commission of the deed so consistent and judicious, that the supposi- 
tion of his perfect responsibility needs no proof. When I have spoken 
of an illogical conclusion, I must not be held to assume that any pro- 
perly-educated physician could be guilty of making such. But it is 
to be supposed that a physician who has been medical attendant on a 
family for thirty years has had suflBcient opportunity of learning its 
circumstances. In particular, it is not to be supposed that the cir- 
cumstances attending the death of E., and which were quite notorious 
in Berlin the next morning, could have remained unknown to Dr. 
L. till after the granting of the certificate, that is, for five whole 
days. He himself has confessed the opposite at his examination on 



232 § 19. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

the 26th of this month. But at the same examioation he acknow- 
ledges that he had learned from Privy Councillor S. the ' doubtful 
circumstances' in which E.'s family had been left, and the object that 
was sought to be attained by his certificate. And though, from the 
well-known honesty of Dr. L.'s character, it cannot be supposed that 
he inmiediately sought to assist a fraud in granting his certificate, 
yet I lament that in an official report I cannot avoid stating that 
prohahly a misplaced philanthropy and attachment to a family who 
had so long befriended him, and who were now involved in unmerited 
misfortune (' reduced to beggary,' as the widow expresses it), induced 
him to certify the irresponsibility of the deceased contrary to his 
own better knowledge. This supposition is not, however, susceptible 
of strict scientific proof, since the statement of Dr. L. at his judicial 
examination and his asseveration of the contrary, at once cuts off the 
possibility of any such proof. When, however, he lays down the 
dogma that ' the commencement of insanity occurs instantaneously, 
like a shock of apoplexy, whenever the mind from unexpected joy or 
terror loses command of itself,' and applies this dogma to the case 
before us, then he cannot avoid seeing that, according to this view 
set up by him, but not in the least agreeing with general medical 
experience, not only this suicide but many other crimes against the 
person, must be regarded as proceeding from sudden attacks of in- 
sanity, an opinion which Dr. L. himself could not admit to be 
correct." Accordingly I answered the question put to me as follows : 
" That Dr. L. could have no medical reason for granting the certificate 
in regard to the mental condition of Councillor E. dated the 1st of 
July last, and particularly for drawing the conclusion that at the 
moment of committing the suicide E. was in an irresponsible condi- 
tion, and that (§ 257. Penal Code) it was to be assumed z.^ probable 
that Dr. L. had granted the said certificate contrary to better know- 
ledge." 

In this most remarkable case it was not possible to give a more 
charitable opinion. The public prosecutor acted not less charitably, 
for Dr. L. was assumed to be afflicted with " a peculiar ignorance," 
and not to be guilty of '^ a scientific deception," and so the matter 
was allowed to drop. 

Case XVI. — A pretended false Life Assurance Certificate. 
From among those cases relating to this matter which have come 



§ 19. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 233 

before me, I am induced to select the following one for relation, 
because §257 of the penal code expressly mentions ^'insurance 
companies/' because accusations on the part of life assurance com- 
panies in regard to medical certificates assumed to be false are of 
frequent occurrence ; and also because the case was difficult enough 
to decide. 

In the medical certificate granted to surgeon S., who died five 
months subsequently, to enable him to assure his life with the life 
assurance company M. at G., by Dr. E., and dated the 25th of 
August, 1851, this physician had declared S. to be healthy, and the 
assurance '' favourable,^' stating also, however, that S. just then 
^' suffered from a temporary hoarseness of a catarrhal character, that 
the tongue was somewhat coated, and that he had at present a slight 
catarrhal cough, with trifling expectoration.'' In the said certificate 
it is, however, expressly stated, " the chest and throat are healthy, the 
complexion is healthy, the respiration is normal, and the circulation re- 
gular." On the 26th of January, 1852, the assured died, according to 
the certificate of Drs. E. and B. of the same date, from '^an extensive 
inflanunation of the lungs " with superadded apoplexy, which disease 
had been induced in the deceased ^' during last week " by a ride in 
stormy weather. The result of the chill was '' a very violent attack 
of pneumonia, with considerable dyspnoea and delirium;" and auscul- 
tation and percussion revealed ''a considerable inflammation of the 
lungs." After the death of S., a report was spread that he had died of 
laryngeal phthisis, from which he was said to have suffered for many 
years, and the company mentioned thought themselves justified in 
moving for the trial of Dr. E. under § 257 of the penal code, for 
having wittingly grauted a false certificate, and in refusing to pay the 
sum assured. " In regard to the question put to me," I stated in 
my report, " I must in the first place ascertain of what disease S. did 
die. In this respect, however, it is to be lamented, that the docu- 
mentary evidence contains not one word as to the opening of the 
body of the deceased, which was probably not performed, and the 
want of this precludes now, as may be easily comprehended, the giving 
of any infallible opinion. The certificate of the physicians named is 
very far from supplying this omission, because though they speak 
of the results of the physical examination of the chest, they do not 
describe the nature of these results, so that we have only their opinion 
to fall back upon, that the deceased laboured under infiammation of 
the lungs. Not a word is said in the certificate as to the amount of 



234 5 19. ILLUSTRA.TIVE CASES. 

fever present ; whether the patient had any pain, and where ; whether 
there was any expectoration, and what it was ; whether every posi- 
tion in bed was equally endurable ; whether swallowing was difficult ; 
whether fungi were present on the tongue or gullet; whether the 
skin was dry or moist, &c. Accordingly, I myself, as well as every- 
one else, am restricted and obliged to rely solely on the opinion of 
Drs. E. and B., and therefore, presupposing the correctness of the 
supposed existence of 'a very violent attack of pneumonia,^ I must 
assume that S. died of inflammation of the lungs and there is 
nothing to show that he died of laryngeal phthisis.'^ 

^' To this I must add, that * a journey to the country in stormy 
weather ^ in January, and the ' chill ' thereby occasioned, are certainly 
according to experience very likely causes to produce an inflammation 
of the lungs, and that on the other hand, a violent inflammation of 
the lungs very frequently proves fatal within six or eight hours, so 
that the mode of origin and the course of the disease in the deceased 
are in favour of the correctness of Dr. E.'s diagnosis. Both of the 
circumstances just referred to would be much more likely to occur in 
a man who for years had suffered from a chronic inflammation and 
ulceration of the mucous membrane of the larynx (laryngeal phthisis). 
According to the testimony of several witnesses, this is said to have 
been the case with S. What the documentary evidence contains in 
regard to this may be reduced to the following. The numerous 
non-professional witnesses examined either know nothing at all in 
regard to S.'s previous state of health, or their depositions are 
rather against the supposition of the existence of any chronic disease 
of the kind, inasmuch as they testily that S. drove through the 
country in all weathers, visiting his patients, and that they saw him 
going about his business but a few days before his death. It is true, 
that we sometimes see consumptive people quite active up to a short 
time before their death, but it is contrary to experience to suppose 
that, in so laborious a profession as that of the deceased, a phthisis, 
which had existed for five years (for the observations of the witnesses 
extend so long back), would not have made greater advances than 
seems to have been actually the case here.'' 

The medical evidence is of more importance. The district physi- 
cian, Dr. S., in S., has only 'for long repeatedly A^d^re?,' that S. laboured 
under ' laryngeal phthisis,' but he had not seen the man himself for 
seven or eight years before his death, still less examined or treated 
him; this evidence, therefore, is not to be looked upon as actually 



§ 19. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES 235 

medical. On the other hand, the district surgeon, B., who had made 
the statement alluded to by Dr. S., describes the appearance of S. pre- 
cisely as being such as is usual in phthisical patients. '^ The whole ap- 
pearance/' says he, '* the external organisation of S. evidently pointed 
out that he was disposed to phthisis. He was thin, slimly-built, with a 
long neck, projecting larynx, flat chest, and wing-like shoulders, which 
projected outwards. I have also heard from his maid-servant, that at 
this time he had a considerable expectoration; this was in the sum- 
mer, 1851 " (that is to say, at the very time the certificate in 
question was granted). '^S. was said to be a great eater, but never- 
theless, wasted rapidly. From these circumstances and bodily 
conditions, I have come to the conclusion that S. laboured under 
consumption, and I formed my opinion accordingly .'' In estimating 
this deposition I have only to remark — ^besides the circumstance that 
it is itself in so far suspicious, as R. is stated to live in enmity with Dr. 
E. the granter of the certificate — that the only fact given in it, namely, 
the so-called phthisical habitus of S., can only prove that he was pre- 
disposed to (laryngeal) phthisis ; from this, however, it does not, of 
course, necessarily follow that this must have, or has developed itself 
to a fatal disease, since with or without {vide above) this predispo- 
sition he might previously die of inflammation of the lungs: 
further, as to what the surgeon E. heard from the maid-servant of 
the deceased, that is not of any importance in a scientific point 
of view. — ^However, he has further deposed, that he himself has 
observed that S. laboured under a ''chronic hoarseness ;'' and this 
statement is of the more importance, that such a hoarseness is an 
almost constant symptom of laryngeal phthisis, and that the existence 
of this chronic hoarseness is also confirmed by Dr. B. Dr. B., how- 
ever adds, that he had not observed this hoarseness to increase during 
five years, so that he regarded it not as a symptom of laryngeal phthi- 
sis, but as the result of '' paralysis of the vocal chords.^' Considering 
now that cases of such a nervous hoarseness certainly do occur, that 
also an evident hoarseness in phthisical patients generally indicates a 
very advanced stage of the disease, and that S. up to a short time 
before his death, carried on his severe professional labours without 
any increase of his hoarseness, it appears to me to be only expKcable 
on the supposition that this hoarseness was most probably not a 
symptom of the existence of (completely developed) laryngeal phthisis 
in S. — ^Accordingly I gave it as my opinion in answer to the query put 
to me, '' {a) that it is impossible to conclude with any certainty that 



236 5 19. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

the morbid phenomena deposed to on oath by witnesses as having 
been observed in surgeon S., who died on the 26th of January, 
1852, had any connection with the existence of laryngeal phthisis in 
the deceased ; (b) that there is no evidence to show that S. has died 
of laryngeal phthisis; '^ and with this the accusation of having granted 
a false scientific certificate was at once dropped. 



SPECIAL DIVISION. 



PART FIRST. 

DISPUTED SEXUAL RELATIONS. 



CHAPTEE I. 

DISPUTED CAPACITY FOR REPRODUCTION. 

Statutoey Regulations. 

General Common Law, § 37, Tit. 1, Part II. Males previous 
to the completion of their eighteenth year, and females before com- 
pletimg their fovrteenth year, are forbidden to marry. 

Rhenish Civil Code, § 144. Males cannot m^arry before complet- 
ing their eighteenth, nor females before completing their fifteenth year. 

Genbbal Common Law, § 669, Tit. 2, Pabt II. Even toper- 
sons younger {than fifty years), permission may be specially granted 
by the Sovereign {to adept children), when from their corporal 
condition or state of health they are no longer to be supposed capable 
of naturally begetting children. 

Ibidem, § 695. Any married person who at or after cohabitation 
by their conduct shall intentionally obstruct the attainment of the 
legitimate object thereof, gives thereby to the other party a lawful 
occasion of divorce. 

Ibidem, § 696. Any incurable cause of complete inability to dis- 
charge the matrimonial duty, even though it have first originated after 
ma/rriage, also gives occasion for divorce. 

Ibidem, § 697. The like is the case with any incurable bodily 
infi/rmity, which excites loathing and disgust, or wholly prevents the 
attainment of the object of marriage. 

Civil Code, §313. No {married) man can, by asserting his 



238 5 1. IMPOTENCE. 

natural impotence, deny the paternity of any child {bom during the 
subsistence of the marriage) y 8fc. 

Penal Code op the Pbussian States, § 193. In the case of any 
mlful ilJr-l/reatment or corporal injury, if the person vnjv/red be muti- 
lated or deprived of (speech, sight, hearing, or) the power of 
procreation [or if any affection of the mind be thereby produced), the 
punishment is penal imprisonment for not more than fifteen years, 

§ 1. Impotence. 

The possibility of natorally completing the act of copulation may 
be disputed^ and become the object of judicial and medico-legal in- 
vestigation, both in civil and criminal cases. In the first especially 
in actions of divorce, since the above-quoted regulations of our 
Statute Book (recently so keenly opposed) present a convenient and 
often-used handle for at least attempting to procure the dissolution 
of a marriage grown loathsome, and this by both parties, but 
especially by the female. But also the regulation of our Common 
Law (§ &69, Tit. %, Part II.), quoted above, which affects the right 
of succession, and in certain circumstances requires testimony of the 
probability that children are no longer to be expected in any given 
marriage, for which of course an official medical opinion is requisite, 
brings us every year several cases for examination. The question of 
the power of procreation more rarely comes before us as a criminal 
one; but it sometimes does so in the case of persons accused of rape 
or incest, who seek to parry the accusation by an assertion of their 
impotence (Case XXVI.) ; and still more rarely in regard to those cases 
coming under § 193 of the Penal Code, when a person injured asserts, 
that the injury has deprived him of the power of procreation. On 
the other hand, the other questions coming under this head, to which 
the expressions of the statutory regulations may give rise, scarcely 
ever occur in practice. § 696 of the Common Law quoted above 
speaks of the " disdiarge of the matrimonial duty '' in general terms, 
without defining the amount thereof! Luckily, amidst the num- 
berless cases which have come before me, there have not been above 
three or four where women of the lower classes have sought for 
a divorce on the ground that their husbands were " incapable " of 
performing "the matrimonial duty" in the measure which they con- 
sidered necessary, or where men have sought for divorce from their 
wives under § 695 [vide above), while these have parried the com- 



§ 2. IMPOTENCE IN THE MALE. 239 

plaint with the assertion, that the husband required from them 
the performance of the "matrimonial duty'^ to an unjustifiable 
amount. Law is just as little able to decide in this matter as science. 
The notorious Queen of Arragon, who ordained by law that the num- 
ber of matrimonial cohabitations should be six daily, would not find her- 
self (in the North) in unison either with law or science. This smutty 
question, however, only comes to the cognizance of the forensic physi- 
cian, when the health of one of the spouses is said to be threatened by 
the excess, or to have sufiered from it, and the medical decision in 
such a case is not difficult, and is to be given in accordance with 
general medical principles, and with due regard to the individual 
in question. Such cases prove, what experience indubitably teaches, 
in regard to all the other questions coming under this head, and 
which may serve as an instructive warning for the inexperienced 
medical jurist, that there is no department of forensic medicine in 
which such incredible lies and shameless assertions will be made to 
the practitioners in order to obtain a favourable opinion, as in this. 
And very naturally, since the result in cases of pregnancy, paternity, 
or divorce, &c., frequently aflFects for b'fe the future position of the 
parties concerned, and also, because the most ignorant non-profes- 
sional possesses the consciousness that in a matter which never 
permits of any witnesses, no third party, not even a physician, can 
come forward perfectly decisively either for or against him. I 
might fill volumes, if they would be of any use, with the shameless 
and absurd declarations which have come before me. In one case, 
a former operation on the genitals was said to have for long rendered 
impotent the man said to be the father of an illegitimate child, and 
the still visible cicatrix of the incision, was — ^the roj^ihe of the scrotum ! 
In another, a shameless fellow had shaved all the hair oflF his pubis, 
and dared to present himself as improperly formed and impotent ! 
Solely to fulfil the design of this work, to support every assertion 
made by actual facts drawn from experience, I shall presently relate, 
amongst the illustrative cases, a few instances of such perfectly base- 
less assertions. 

§ 2. Continuation. — Examination of Both Sexes. — i. The 

Male. 

How are we to examine and determine the power of erection of 
the male organ, which is necessary for procreation ? This question 



240 f 2. IMPOTENCE IN THE MALE. 

has from an early period occupied the attention of lawyers and me- 
dical men, and in France it gave rise to a judicial procedure, which 
subsisted till near the end of the seventeenth century, which I shall re- 
late, because it proves at once the importance and the difficulty of the 
subject. I refer to the matrimonial proof termed Congrhy to which 
all complaining spouses were submitted. After both parties were 
sworn that they would perform bond fide the matrimonial duty, and 
after the experts were also sworn, the married couple were examined 
corporeally, and frequently quite naked ; after this both. were put to 
bed, where they were allowed to remain from one to two hours, when 
the experts were again summoned, and the woman again locally ex- 
amined, specially to ascertain an facta sit emissio, ubi, quid et quale 
emissum, and in regard to this a report was then drawn up ! 1 In 
1653, a certain Marquis de Langey married a girl aged fourteen, and 
lived with her four years in marriage. In 1657, the lady raised a 
complaint against her spouse of impotence, the '^Congres'^ declared 
against him, and the marriage was dissolved. This "proven'^ (!) 
impotent married a second time one Diana de Montault, and begot 
seven children with her. This abominable "CJongres'^ was at length 
abolished.* — Not less revolting, however, and what is of most im- 
portance, not less incapable of proving anything, are aU the methods 
of investigating the power of erection, recommended even by the 
best of the older Handbooks, such as manipulation, friction, elec- 
tricity, frc. ! ! For I do not require to state, that such artificial 
nervine stimulants might produce an erection, which under the 
natural circumstances in question would not occur, while it is 
very possible that in other cases a practice so atrocious, and so re- 

* As another proof of the incredible proceedings of the law courts in 
these matters in olden times, I shall here shortly relate the proceedings in 
the action of divorce instituted by the Countess of Essex in James the First's 
time. She wished to marry the favourite of the King, the powerful Earl of 
Somerset, with whom she had fallen in love, and she therefore raised an 
action of divorce for impotence against her husband. In proof of her asser- 
tion she declared, that after being married for three years she was still a 
virgin. A jury of peeresses and matrons (sic !) were charged with the inves- 
tigation, which confirmed the statement of the Countess. Subsequently, how- 
ever, it became known that the Countess had at this investigation substituted 
for herself a young woman of her own age and size ! ! Her husband, on his 
part, confessed that he was impotent, though not absolutely so j and, by 
seven voices to five, it was determined to annul the existing marriage, and 
permit the parties concerned to enter into new matrimonial arrangements ! — 
Hargraves' State Trials, i. p. 315. 



§ 2. IMPOTENCE IN THE MALE. 241 

volting to the moral feelings, performed by one man, — a strange physi- 
cian, — upon another would have precisely the opposite effect. But all 
such methods of examination, which, very properly, have been for 
ever abandoned, are not only indecent, and incapable of proving any- 
thing, but also perfectly superfluous. Because — and I hold this to 
be one of the most important dogmas in the whole doctrine of disputed 
procreative power — the possession of virile and procreative power 
neither requires to be, nor can be, proved to exist by any physician, 
but is rather, like every other normal function, to be supposed to 
exist within the usual limits of age. A physician cannot, and just as 
little requires to prove the existence of healthy digestion, for instance. 
He can rather only prove, that in the case in question the normal 
degree is not present, when his investigation reveals symptoms which, 
according to general experience, are known to prove the existence of 
a diseased or anormal condition of the digestive function. The case is 
the same with respect to the virile power. The power of the male 
organ to erect itself, for the reasons given neither can nor requires to 
be proved. It must rather be presupposed to exist in every male 
within the natural limits of age (§7), for he has been formed by na- 
ture to procreate, so long as no reasons can be proved to exist which 
would prevent it, and upon which a medical opinion of an opposite 
character may be based. Therefore, the forensic physician must make it 
a rule to construct all his reports on these cases in a negative form, 
even when the Judge (as is usually the case) puts a positive question, 
" Does he possess the power of copulation ? '* and he must therefore 
answer that, "the examination has revealed nothing which could 
justify the supposition that the person examined is not capable of com- 
pleting the act of copulation.'^ That the Judge will always be satis- 
fied with this, is, on the one hand self-evident, and I have, on the other 
hand, experienced it in all the cases in which my opinion was requested. 
Accordingly, the task of the forensic physician in every case of dis- 
puted viriUty is to ascertain, by an examination of the individual, 
whether any conditions exist in him which are found from experience 
to prevent the erection and immission of the penis ? Since all these 
causes in general deprive such a man of the power of procreation, 
they will require to be considered separately {vide § 7). At present, 
we have only to mention one other general dogma, which is of great 
importance for the forensic physician in deciding such cases, who 
cannot be too sceptical after what we have already said in regard to 
the lying assertions of the parties concerned, and the physiological 

VOL. III. R 



242 § 2. IMPOTENCE IN THE MALE. 

correctness of which I am certain that every old and experienced 
physician is as much convinced as myself. I refer to the dogma, 
that impotentia coeundi in a healthy man, that is, that an absolute in- 
capacity for the work of procreation, is a phenomenon of the rarest 
occurrence; by this I do not, however, mean to assert, that the 
claims which many men sometimes make upon themselves, and even 
married women on their spouses, in regard to amount of capacity 
can always be satisfied. This is a question which never occurs in 
medico-legal practice, either in civil (paternity, &c.) or in criminal 
cases. Every physician in practice will be often enough consulted 
by men seeking assistance for thehr impotence, which they fancy to 
be absolute ; by young men who have read their ^ Tissot' and have 
made themselves unhappy, and by older ones, who, for other reasons, 
have an evil conscience. But every physician also knows, that these 
psychical impediments, though they exist and are eflfectual for a time, 
are yet by degrees removed, and never result in " complete and in- 
curable impotence.'' This dogma is especially to be maintained in 
respect of actions of divorce, because, in an uninterrupted course of 
carnal cohabitation, an absolute and lasting impotence in a (healthy) 
man (within the natural limits of age), is certainly a perfectly 
uncommon and most rare phenomenon, and the natural desire will 
always from time to time assert its rights. 

It is otherwise with the relative impotence, which the Prussian law 
refers to, when it i^vide above) speaks of " incurable bodily infirmity, 
which excites loathing and disgust.'' That the excitement of the 
nervous system, which is much more efficacious in exciting and 
fitting a man for the act of copulation than the mere stimulus of a 
store of seminal fluid, may be hindered by depressing emotions, hate, 
aversion, loathing, and disgust to any given female, is just as expli- 
cable physiologically as it has been actually proved, and shall not, 
therefore, be disputed here. The well-known case of Euggieri, always 
quoted in relation to this fact, of the young woman whose body was 
covered with black crisp hair, and whose husband could not, there- 
fore approach her, may serve as an authentic example of this cha- 
racter. But \\\Q forensic physician must, in such cases of pretended 
relative impotence, be all the more upon his guard, that his attention 
will be equally claimed by the most shameless and audacious asser- 
tions inforo (Cases XXXI., XXXIV., XXXV., and XXXVIII.) 
and by many examples of the old proverb, de gustibus, &c., which 
will obtrude themselves upon his notice. Kossi, Clarus junior, and 



§ 3. STERILITY IN THE FEMALE. 243 

others, saw cases of pregnancy in women with a cloaca formation. 
I myself have repeatedly had to examine, because of her disputed 
capacity for undergoing a punishment, a public whore afflicted with 
an old vesico- vaginal fistula, and whose presence was really sufficient 
to excite both ^Hoathing and disgust/' Another similar, and per- 
haps unique, instance was brought to light by an investigation 
(according to the former statutes) regarding the concealed pregnancy 
of a cretinous creature, about twenty years old, who lived in the 
comer of a small room, squatting upon her deformed and paralysed 
limbs, gliding out of this comer when she had deposited her faeces 
beneath her. She was impregnated by a man-servant a tergo ! ! 

§ 3. Continuation. — 2. The Female. 

From the nature of the circumstances, an objective examination 
into the pretended incapacity for copulation in a female is not 
only possible but also requisite. Very rarely, however, shall we be 
conscientiously constrained to assume the existence of any such 
sterility in a female, without suffering ourselves to be deceived by 
the assertions of the one party or the other. Such a spasmodic 
irritabiUty or Ayperasthena of the female genitals as to render the act 
of copulation impossible, as is detailed in ancient examples (P. 
Zacchias), seems rather apocryphal. At least, it is certainly re- 
markable that throughout the entire literature of this subject, which 
is so rich in material, cases of this character are so rare. A medical 
man ( ! ) had raised an action of divorce against his young wife for 
the pretended reason, that whenever coitus was attempted, she fell 
into such a ^'convulsed'' condition as ^^ to inspire him with loathing 
and disgust, and completely to prevent the fulfilling of the object of 
marriage^' (§ 697, Gen. Common Law). My examination did not 
reveal any cause which could lend even the slightest probability to 
the assertion of the husband, who, moreover, brought this accusation 
forward for the first time after many years of married life, and who 
neither as physician nor spouse seemed to have made the slightest 
attempt to cure these ^' convulsions,'* &c., and the citation of these 
reasons in my report sufficed to nonsuit the plaintiff judicially. 
Even an unusual narrowness of the vagina as a pretended absolute or 
relative impediment to the act of coition — ^in which latter case both 
parties must be examined — ^is very rare, and cannot be admitted as 
any reason for female sterility. For, on the one hand, this canal, 

b2 



244 § 3. STERILITY IN THE FEMALE. 

like every other canal/is easily capable of being dilated, of which, es- 
pecially for our present question, the urethra affords a not unimportant 
example, for it has been frequently erroneously employed by men, 
and by use has been gradually fitted for perfect coition;* on the 
other hand, it can be no longer doubted, that the minute quantity 
of semen necessary to fructify the ovulum may reach the uterus 
through even a very much contracted vagina, and by means of, if 
we choose to call it so, a most imperfect act of coition. Hohl t has 
found the vagina so contracted, and as it were annularly constricted, 
that the point of index finger could scarcely enter, and yet pregnancy 
occurred, and the act of copulation had been frequently completed. The 
same experienced author relates a peculiar cause of contraction of the 
vagina by a perineum which intruded between the labia majora. I 
myself have in my own practice seen a similar"case, in which, after 
seven years of a childless marriage, the source of obstruction felt by the 
husband was found to be also a hypertrophied perineum, which was 
continued upwards over one-fourth of the labia majora. A simple 
incision remedied this, as it may often remedy cases of partial adke- 
sion of the walls of the vagina, which, however, does no prevent 
coition, nor even fruitful coition, in proof of which we have numerous 
authentic instances of cases of conception recorded. A relative nar- 
rowness of the vagina to the development of the male organ has like- 
wise, as well as every kind of anormal dimension of the yard itself 
been regarded from the earliest times as a cause of divorce. :[ Here 
female shamelessness has its freest field, and Case XXXVIII. 
affords proof of the baseless assertions that may be made. But 
even when there is an actually deficient development of the organ, 
such as I have often seen in perfectly strong and healthy men, so 
that in a relaxed condition it only measured from one inch to one 
inch and a-half in length, this does not in the least prevent the com- 
pletion of the act of copulation and impregnation, as physiology and 
experience alike teach us ; and the like is to be assumed in regard to 
too long or too thick a penis. In the first place, there is no dimen- 
sion that can be called normal for this organ, and the superior con- 
sistory of Sweden undertook, in the seventeeth century, a vain and 
unscientific task, when they attempted to determine these normal 
measurements, and to use them as a basis for their decision in actions 

* Diet. d. Scieno. Med. Tom. xxiv. p. 210. 
t Lehrb. d. Geburtshiilfe. Leipzig, 1855, s. 263. ^ 
t Too short a penis may be a cause of barrenness and a reason for divorce, 
says Zacchias, QumU pp. 278, 284. 



§ 4. ANORMALITY OF THE GENITALS. 245 

for divorce. On the other hand, it cannot be disputed, that even 
with too large a penis the semen may be introduced into the female 
genitals in a perfectly natural manner. When authors, however, have 
raised doubts as to the maintenance of the health of the female thereby, 
and have spoken of the dangers arising from blows thus administered 
upon the vaginal portion of the uterus, &c., these doubts may be 
allayed by considering that, even a length of from five to six inches 
is unusual for an erected penis, while the normal length of the 
vagina is from six to seven inches. An unusually greai inclifiation of 
the pelvis may prove a source of obstruction to the completion of 
the act in the female, at least in the normal supine position ; but 
this may be remedied by a recourse to the prone position, as I 
myself have had occasion to remark in the case of a young married 
couple, who found it quite impossible to consummate their marriage 
in the usual manner, on account of the skoliotic condition of the 
woman, and the consequent great inclination of her pelvis, but who 
were subsequently enabled to beget two children by adopting the 
prone position. Finally, there remains to be enumerated all bodies 
which obstruct the canal, such as very large condylomatous vegeta- 
tions, large cystic and other tumours, large prolapsus of the vagina 
or uterus which have existed for a long time, which aU require to be 
considered and decided upon according the peculiar circumstances of 
each case, and the power of art to remove the obstruction and 
remedy the existing incapacity. This is certainly most easily done 
in regard to all anormalities of the hymeuy particularly in regard to 
atresia, and the still more rarely occurring hypertrophy of the mem- 
brane, termed the fleshy hymen, in which a surgical must be called 
to the aid of the carnal operation. All that has been already stated 
holds also good in regard to the objective, as well as relative ob- 
structions to coitus in the female. The same shameless assertions 
made by married men, are also produced vn foro by married women 
(Cases XXVII. to XXX., and XXXIV. to XXXIX.), and equally 
by them it will be found that custom, affection, or a feeling of duty 
will do away with much that is in general recognised as productive 
of " loathing and disgust." Who does not know many happy mar- 
ried men afflicted with ozsena, sweaty feet, and the like ! 

§4. Continuation. — Anobmality op the Genitals. 

Coitus and impi'egnation may be prevented by anormalities of the 
genital organs, either congenital or the result of disease. The latter. 



246 f 4. ANORMALITY OF THE GENITALS. 

as phimosis^ paraphimosis^ large condylomatous excrescences^ &c.^ 
in man^ similar affections in woman^ and also congenital affections, 
do not occur in medico-legal practice, however frequent they may be 
in actual life, because those affected with them know full well that 
they would not by means of them attain their end, but that the 
Judge, or at least the forensic physician, would only refer them to 
their own medical attendant. But cases do occur of very large 
scrotal hemise, old, and for long irreducible, for though they do not 
occasion anormality of the male organ, yet they may completely 
enclose it, and I myself have seen cases in which the impossibility 
of coition was at once apparent from the size of the tnmour, which 
was often as large as a man's hat, and in one case descended as low 
as the middle of the thigh, and was supported by a bandage resting 
on the shoulders. I hold it, however, to be necessary to state, that 
the usual small reducible inguinal hemise, which are of such fre- 
quent occurrence, are also very frequently brought forward by men 
as pretended causes of impotence, in order to attain their own selfish 
ends. It is not, however, difficult to decide these cases. 

Congenital malformation of the genitals in both sexes are of extreme- 
ly rare occurrence, if we except the very trifling amount of hypospadia 
in men, marked only by the opening of the urethra close below the apex 
of the glans, which is of far more frequent occurrence than is generally 
supposed, and is of no importance in regard to the questions before 
us. It is different, however, when the urethra opens lower down be- 
tween the glans and the root of the penis, or even in the raphe itself, 
or finally, the urethra may be completely slit open. In regard to 
such extreme degrees of hypospadia, different views have been held 
by different anatomists and medical jurists ; sometimes, the uncon- 
ditional impossibility of (fruitful) coition has been assumed (Teich- 
meyer, Hebenstreit, Haller, and others), at others, this has been 
assumed to be conditional, according to the higher or lower situation 
of the urethral aperture (Zacchias, Metzger, Rose, Kopp, Henke, 
&c.). {Vide § 6). Another congenital mjdformation allied to hypo- 
spadia, is the opening of the urethra superiorly, either upon the 
glans or upon the dorsum of the pern's, or close to its attachment 
{epispadia, anaspadia). Epispadia is of extremely rare occurrence, 
and most rare as the sole congenital malformation of the genitals, as 
it is usually associated with complete division of the urethra, and 
with a more or less completely rudimentary form of the penis. The 
more complete the latter malformation is, so much the less fit the indi- 



§5. CAPACITY FOR PROCREATION.— HYPOSPADIA. 247 

vidual will be for the act of procreation {vide § 6). A case of 
this kind, which may serve as a sample of what has been stated as to 
the false declarations occurring in Jbro, mnst not be omitted. In 
the summer of 1847, I had to examine K., a healthy man, aged 
thirty-four, on account of a claim of paternity made against him, 
which he repelled by declaring himself to be completely impotent. The 
appearance of the sexual organs was most interesting, and as follows : 
the scrotum was strongly retracted, but on each side there was dis- 
tinctly to be felt a testicle of the usual size, with its cord ; there 
was a congenital inveraio vesica urinaria ; urine continually flowed, 
over the bright-red vesical mucous membrane, and when he had re- 
cently drunk, a thin stream of urine spirted out from time to time ; 
the penis was pressed quite flat, and was a mere rudiment, one inch 
in length and one in thickness, the urethra was open, and run Hke a 
shallow gutter along the dorsum of the rudimentary organ. K. 
declared that he had never perceived any erection of this part. Yet 
lAis man was said to have begotten a child ! Precisely a similar 
malformation, so much so that the drawings of each, which I possess, 
might pass for representations of the same individual, were observed 
in 1851, in a stranger, who had married a wife with whom he had 
lived for several years, but without children. 

Congenital malformations of this character pass into so-called 
hermaphroditism (yide § 6). 

§5. Capacity for Peocreation. — Hypospadia and Epispadia. 

Procreation presupposes the existence of normal sexual organs, 
and their normal employment by both parties concerned in the act. 
But the existence and functions of these organs may deviate within 
certain limits from the normal, without prejudice to the possibility of 
a fruitful impregnation. In this respect, we must commence with the 
slighter malformations, and we have already pointed out (§ 4) that 
trifling deviations of the aperture of the urethra towards the under 
surface of the penis, do not present the slightest obstacle to impreg- 
nation. The higher grades of hypospadia in males otherwise normally 
formed, might in earlier times, while the theory of procreation was 
yet solely confined to hypothesis, have been acknowledged without 
any limits as to degree as permitting impregnation, because at that 
time there prevailed the most wonderful theory of an aura seminalis 
or seminal atmosphere, which of itself, and without any assistance 



248 § 5. CAPACITY FOR PROCREATION.-.HYPOSPADIA. 

from the actual substance of the semen^ could produce pregnancy if it 
could get into the neighbourhood of the female sexual organs. Even 
in recent times physicians (Kopp, Heim^ Formey, &c.) of no mean 
reputation have within the first ten years of this century held fast to 
this ancient hypothesis, and have published bond fide " cases '* (' ) ^^ 
pregnancies the result of the ejaculation of the semen upon the belly 
of the woman,* without considering that in such matters not the 
slightest confidence is to be placed in any statement of the parties 
concerned ! But in the present position of physiology, and now that 
light has been thrown upon the mystic obscurity of the doctrine of 
procreation, nothing can be said in physiology, and particularly in 
forensic medicine, in regard to an aura seminalis, or impregnation 
without coitus, that is to say, of impregnation without the introduction 
of seminal animalcula into the female genital organs. It is, however, 
remarkable and perfectly relevant to the matter in hand, that from 
another point of view, precisely the most advanced physiologists 
deny afresh the inevitable necessity of coitus, when by that is under- 
stood the usual normal act of procreation for impregnation, and 
regard the act itself only as a means of facilitating the introduction 
of the impregnating fluid into the female organs, and which they 
therefore term '^a mechanical contrivance of subordinate value'' 

* The pamphlet, Lucina sine concubitu, mentioned in the preface, is so 
often qnoted by the earlier Handbooks as the "chief authority" for the 
theory of the aura seminalis^ that it does not appear superfluous to dispose 
of this once for all. I possess two copies of this very rare pamphlet, the 
French and the German translations of tiie English original which was pub- 
lished more than a hundred years ago. The first is thus entitled, Lucina 
sine concubitu, Lettre adreaaSe a la SociHi Royale de Londrea, dans la quelle il 
est pleinment demontrS, &c. Londres, 1750 (48, p. 12) ; the German is en- 
titled " Lucina s, con," "A letter addressed to the Royal Society of London, 
in which it is plainly proved, both from reason and experience, that a 
woman may become pregnant and produce a child without any assistance 
from a man. Translated from the English." Frankf. u. Leipzig, 1751 
(80, p. 12). The author calls himself Abraham Johnson, The pamphlet is 
evidently a satire on the learned men of the time, particularly upon 
WoUaston and Warburton, and particularly on the theory of the former, 
" that animalculsB are sown abroad in convenient spots, and that these are 
the fructifying seeds of all impregnations." The author says that he has 
"discovered a wonderful cylindro-catoptic-rotundo-concavo-convez machine, 
for collecting the animalculse floating in the fructifying regions of the at- 
mosphere " &c. ! and such a pamphlet as this has been for a hundred years 
continually quoted as a proof of the possibility of impregnation without 
coitus ! ! 



§ 5. CAPACITY FOR PROCREATION— HYPOSPADIA. 249 

(Leuckart). " The facts known in regard to the artificial impregna- 
tion of animals/' says Valentin,**^ "teach us that copulation 
(coitus) is not a necessary condition for impregnation. It is merely 
an expedient selected by nature for bringing together the two 
different kinds of germs in many animals. . . . The rigidity of the 
organ is not a necessary condition for the ejaculation of the semen or 
for impregnation. It only materially favours the act of copula- 
tion. . . . Since the seminal stream may describe a tolerable large 
arc, it may force its way into the vagina, though only the point of 
the glans be introduced between the lips of the vulva, or if these be 
separated, in any other manner. And the spontaneous movements of 
spermatozoa make it possible for them subsequently to reach the 
cavity of the uterus through its os.'^ Since it has become known, 
that no great quantity of the impregnating fluid was necessary for 
impregnation, and that the smallest quantity of semen contained a 
large amount of the fructifying elements — ^in the experiments of 
Prevost and Dumas 0.012 gr. of semen sufficed to impregnate one 
hundred-and-twelve frogs' ova — since then the question of the rela- 
tion of the completion of the act of copulation to impregnation, has 
for forensic medicine acquired quite a different signification. Facts 
which exist in regard to the power of impregnation possessed by 
otherwise normally formed men afflicted with hypospadia even in 
an extreme degree, in whom though a natural immission of the penis 
was possible, yet an equally natural introduction of the semen was 
impossible, speak in favour of the correctness of the views and obser- 
tions of recent physiologists ; while on their part, these physiological 
discoveries explain these facts, and — what must always be decisive 
for the medical jurist — ^make them credible. Not oidy do Schenk 
and Simeon describe cases of hereditary hypospadia, a fact much in 
favour of the actual paternity of the hypospadiac parent, not only does 
Schweikhard describe an impregnation by a man afflicted with 
hypospadia, in whom the aperture of the urethra " was between the 
origins of the corpora cavernosa and the anterior and superior surface 
of the scrotum,^' so that the aperture had " a horizontal direction, 
and the urine and semen passed through it in a horizontal direction 
in the longitudinal direction of the penis,'' t but Traxel has also 
recently published a most remarkable case, which his accurate ob- 

* Grundr. d. Physiol. 4 Aufl. 1855, s. 817. 

t Kopp, Jahrb. d. Staatsarzneik, iii. Frankf. 1810, s. 246. 



250 J 5. CAPACITY FOR PROCREATION.— HYPOSPADIA. 

servation renders deserving of confidence, and which I fed con- 
strained to give in detail.* 

An unmarried woman, aged twenty-seven years, who had given 
birth to a child, asseverated upon oath, that for the last three years 
she never had carnal connection with any man, but frequently with 
the unmarried woman, Johanna K., who was formed like a man, and 
this the latter also confessed. Johanna K. is thirty-seven years 
old, and her whole habitus is that of a man. She is tall, her 
muscular fibre firm, her limbs angular, her features manly, her chest 
covered with hair, and she has no female breasts, her pelvis is 
narrow. The scrotum is separated into two sacs, in each of which 
a testicle may be felt. Between these sacs there is a fissure covered 
with a red translucent cuticle, and in this cleft close to the root of 
the penis there is an opening the size of a lentil seed, which is the 
aperture of the urethra. The penis was shorter than in the normal 
condition, tolerably thick, and unperforated. A round smooth fur- 
row, which exactly represented the half of the urethra split longitu- 
dinally, commenced at the opening already mentioned, and coursed 
along the whole length of the under surface of the penis and 
the glans as far as the pomt where the urethral aperture is nor- 
mally situated. Accordingly, the urethra opens externally im- 
mediately after passing through the ligammtum triangulare, and 
is split throughout its whole course along the penis. In the 
divided urethra, about a line behind the corona of the glans, two 
small elliptical openings were seen, which might permit the passage 
of a bristle, and a third similar opening was visible in the same 
furrow two lines in front of the aperture of the urethra. The child 
born was very remarkable. It was mature and healthy, but its sexual 
organs were fashioned almost predseh/ like those of Johanna K, The 
scrotum was likewise divided into two sacs, in each of which a 
testicle could be felt. On the situation of the clitoris there was an 
unperforated glans unprovided with a preputium. The fissure, 
covered with a reddish cuticle, is as deep as the diameter of the sacs 
containing the testicles, and where these are mutually in contact, each 
side is covered with a longish, red, spongy caruncle, which might 
be regarded as female nymphae. The urethra opens at the root of 
the rudimentary penis, immediately after its passage through the 
ligamentum triangulare, and is of the diameter of that of a newborn 

♦ Prager Vierteljahrsohrift, 52 Bd. s. 103. Wiener medicin Woohen- 
schrift, 1856, 18. 



§ 6. HERMAPHRQPITISM. 251 

girl, but without any hymen. The pelvis is narrow and small, the 
hips not broad. Traxel quite correctly holds it to be indubitable 
that Johanna K. is a man, and the father of the child, and he explains 
the possibility of impregnation, by supposing that the three openings, 
described as situate in the split urethra, are anormally situated aper- 
tures of the seminal ducts, or that — ^which is much more probable — 
the split urethral canal is so closed during coitus by the posterior 
wall of the vagina, that the semen when ejaculated would penetrate 
as far as the os uteri itself. 

I know of no example of an impregnation effected by a man afflicted 
with epispadia ; and I have only to repeat that epispadia is in itself 
a very rare malformation, and almost never occurs alone, that is, 
simply as an anormal opening of urethra superiorly. 

According to the present state of our knowledge and experience, 
however, the following dogma in regard to capacity for procreation 
possessed by those afflicted with hypospadia and epispadia, may be 
laid down, where the formation is otherwise that of a normal male. 
Hypospadia and Epispadia op themselves poem no eeason for 
assuming an incapacity for procreation, so long as it can- 
not be proved in any given case that it is impossible for 

ANY SEMEN TO ENTER THE VAGINAL CANAL, aS for instaUCC, whcu the 

urethra opens perpendicularly upon the perineum. 

§ 6. Continuation. — Hermaphroditism. 
Statutory Regulations. 

General Common Law, § 19, Tit. 1, Part 1. — When a herma- 
phrodite is born, the parents must decide the sex in which he is to 
be reared, § 20. Tet, after having attained the age of eighteen years, 
every stich person is free to choose which sex he shall abide by. § 21. 
The future rights of any such person shall be determined by this 
choice. § 22. Should, however, the rights of any third party be 
affected by the sex of any such hermaphrodite, he may petition for 
an examination by any expert. § 23. The decision of the expert 
shall be decisive, even if opposed to the choice, either of the herma- 
phrodite or his parents. 
♦ A trae hermaphrodite, that is, a double set of organs with the 
functions of both sexes united in one individual, is never found in 
the human species. Pretended facts of the opposite character to 



252 § 6. HERMAPHRODITISM. 

be found in the earlier writers on tbe subject are based upon mis- 
takes^ which are the more easily understood from the then existing state 
of science, when we remember that pathological anatomists are not yet 
agreed upon all questions in relation to human hermaphroditism^ upon 
their best classification, &c. Thus Forster, Berthold, and others, 
assume the existence of a hermaphroditJ sinus transversals, in which the 
germ-glands of the one sex are associated with the intermediate and 
external genital organs of the other, whilst Valentin sees in such cases 
merely a deceptive indication and similarity of form. When Berg- 
mann says in his excellent treatise,* that all the requisites of a 
perfect hermaphrodite fitted for the functions of both sexes, the con- 
nection of the testicles by means of the vas deferens with a penis 
fitted for coition, and also Fallopian tubes, a uterus and vagina, may 
be '^ imagined'^ as capable of being united in one individual, I will 
not dispute it. But when Bergmann himself adds, that " such a 
formation may occur only perhaps once among a billion of men,^' he 
gives thereby a decision as to the value of this view in regard to the 
medico-legal aspects of the query. Moreover, forensic medicine has 
its own peculiar requirements to maintain, and leaving to patholo- 
gical anatomists the doctrine of the development of hermaphroditism 
from the original morphological identity of the organs of both sexes, 
it has only to consider how to answer in each individual case the 
forensic questions in regard to the determination of the sex, the 
rights of marriage, and the capacity for procreation of such pseudo- 
hermaphrodites, with all that thereon depends for the individual 
himself. It has to assume as proven, the existence of the by no 
means small number of cases in which the organs of both sexes 
are found simultaneously in one individual, a more or less rudimen- 
tary penis and a uterus, testicles, and ovaries.t And experience 

* R. Wagner, Handworterh. d, Physiologie, iii. ss. 127, 131. 

t Siebenhaar, Encycl, Handhuch der ger, Arznk, 11, s. 880. Maret in 
Mahon, Medic legale, I. s. 100. Recent cases by Berthold, Abhdlgn, d^r 
Gottinger Societdt, 1845, Barkow in Casper* s Med. Wochenscrift^ IS 15, 
No. 23. The much spoken- of case of Carl Durrg6, published by Mayer, 
with an excellent account of the dissection (and a representation) ihifkm^ 
1835 1 a, eOO. Testicles with vas defer ens , and uterus with Fallopian tubef* 
CprepEtration in the Wiirzburg collection), mentioned by Eiwisch, Klin. 
Yortrage, 11. 3 Aufl. Prag. 1857, s. 393, &c. Cases of so-called " female 
hermaphrodites" are scarcely known. A penis-like clitoris was only seen ^ 
three times among many thousand public prostitutes examined by Far^ct- 
Ducliatelet {Prostitut dans la ville de Parts), There is a description and 
T^presentation of a case of this kind which was cured by operation^ oqh- 



1 



§ 6. HERMAPHRODITISM. 253 

teaches us, that in such cases the male sex almost always predomi- 
nates, and that so-called "female hermaphrodites '' are only extremely 
rarely observed, and are perfectly erroneously so termed, being only 
more or less normally-formed women in whom an unusual develop- 
ment of clitoris presents some resemblance to a penis. 

The cases, however, which come before the medical jurist concern 
living men, and what in them is evident and can be proved by the 
senses to exist. Accordingly, besides what has been already de- 
tailed in regard to hypospadia and epispadia (§ 5), we have, in each 
case, to ascertain whether in the malformed scrotum, which, as I my- 
self have seen, by being retracted in the raphe, and by the formation 
of a false passage, may very much resemble the labia ma^ora, one 
or two testicles exist or not, not forgetting in the latter case the 
possibility of crypsorchia (§ 7), or whether a uterus is to be felt by 
an examination per vaginam. A due regard to the'general sexual 
type of the individual is not less important than attention to the 
formation of the sexual organs. Here I may, however, state by way 
of warning, that when the individual is already somewhat advanced in 
years, the general hahitus may be deceptive. For it is very well 
known, that old women, in whom the sexual functions have long 
ceased, very often assume a manly appearance. I have had occasion 
to observe numerous examples of this in old women who have been 
long in prison, or in a lunatic asylum ; in these the female breasts 
quite disappear, a beard is developed on the lips and chin, and they 
acquire a rough and manly voice, so that when lying in bed covered 
up to the chest, they may very readily be mistaken for a man. Precisely 
similar observations have been made by physiologists in relation to the 
animal kingdom. But what is in general to be remarked is, absence or 
scantiness of the beard, position of hairs upon the pubis (these being 
in men produced, be it in ever so narrow a streak, towards the pubis, 
while in women they form an arch, and are confined to the limits of the 
mons veneris), prominence of the larynx, which is a distinctive mark 
of the male, the male or female characters of the voice, the presence or 
absence of breasts, the formation of the pelvis, the general Ijodily hahi" 
im^ and fuiiher, whether the existence of semen in these pseudo-her- 
m.nplirodi(.e.s can be asntfrtaiiKid (from the oceurrence of pollutions 
which may be C(M|to™djflU^Bm stiuna seen upon the clothes, and 
td-iied In a puimy^^^^^^^^^BFi ^ thaiik the kindness of the author). 




254 5 6. HERMAPHRODITISM. 

which must be examined microscopically), or, on the other hand, 
whether there is any menstrual flux, — ^while less stress is to be lid 
upon the sexual inclinations, since along with this hermaphrodite 
condition of the body there seems often to coexist a similar, so to 
speak, condition of the mind, and the being seems to feel neither quite 
a man, nor quite a woman, as may be easily understood. Marie 
Kosine Gottlich, decidedly a man, but with txuly hermaphrodite 
external genitals, which I have repeatedly examined,* permitted 
himself to be constantly used as a woman. As nature has created 
transitional forms between the strongly-marked characteristics of the 
opposite sexes, so we have not only mentally womanish men, and 
m^y women, but also quasi-transitional forms of the body'; and phy- 
siology has to explain why we have men without beards, and with 
largely-developed womanish hips, and women with undeveloped 
breasts and with often quite a strong growth of beard, &c. Here we 
have only to deal with actually doubtful sexual formation. The 
division and nomenclature of the ancient medicina/ormsis, and/rogyni 
or male, and/rogyncd [gynand/n) or female hermaphrodites, are to be 
rejected as they betoken nothing actually or scientifically distinct, 
and besides, the word and/rogyni was used by the ancients in quite a 
different sense (§ 20). If it be required to determine medico-legally 
the doubtful and disputed sex of any individual, no systematic classi- 
fication of hermaphroditic formation, and least of all, any one so 
superficial and worthless as that referred to, would simplify the 
diagnosis, which must rather be based upon the individual peculi- 
arities of each separate case so far as these can be ascertained during 
. life. Such investigations may occur, and have now and then occurred, 
in relation to the decision of certain questions, such as the capacity 
for marriage of either sex, or the right of succession to any in- 
heritance (such as any title of Jnobility, or other right of primoge- 
niture, &c.), or (as in a case which happened in America), the power 
of exercising any political right pertaining only to males (active or 
passive right of election), &c. The medical jurist will, in such cases, 
have to determine, whether the individual is to be regarded as a male 
or female, and he will be required to base his opinions on the 
criteria just detailed ; and there is certainly no other question in 
which he may be more easily led astray, and none in which error can 
be more readily excused, since he can only employ, in making his 

* Vide the description and representation in Casper's Wochensohrift, 1833, 
I. No. 3. 



§ 7. INCAPACITY FOR PROCREATION. 255 

decision, those appearances visible externally, and not the internal 
anatomical facts. Carl Durrg^ formerly Maria Derrier, could exhibit 
quite as large a collection of certificates from celebrated anatomists 
and physicians in favour of his being a female, as of his being male. 

§ 7. Continuation. — 1. Incapacity foe Procreation in the 

Male. 

It is self-evident, that all that has been stated in the foregoing 
paragraphs in regard to the conditions causing incapacity for coition, 
also cause incapacity for procreation, but not the reverse. For most of 
the cases which occur are precisely those in which, while there has 
been actual sterility, especially in marriages which have lasted many 
years, coitus has yet been perfectly normally carried out by both 
parties. It is most extraordinary, that, according to my experience, 
the law takes no cognizance of this important distinction in regard 
to disputed capacity for procreation, especially in cases of affiliation, 
and in such cases, merely requires the expert to ascertain that the 
man is not incapable of performing the act of coition, the presup- 
posing, as it were, in the case of an affirmative answer, the existence 
of the power of procreation. It is, however, the duty of the physi- 
cian, on suitable occasions, to set the Judge right in regard to this, 
and to point out to him when the case in hand requires it, that there 
are not a few obstacles to the fruitfulness of the act of coition. 

In the first place, the capacity for procreation in a man presup- 
poses the existence of testicles. The duplicity of these organs is a 
luxury of nature,"*^ since we do not now-a-days require to state that 
the possession of but one testicle (monorchides) is perfectly sufficient 
for procreation — I need not add, for the procreation of both sexes!! 
— as I myself have had occasion to observe in the case of the 
husbands in two marriages, which were very successful in this 
respect, and as indeed is no longer in any danger of being disputed. 
The position of the testicle in the scrotum is just as little necessary 
as its duplicity. Sixtus the Fifth declared in 1587, in a circular 
letter to his nuncio in Spain, — ^probably not without first getting the 
opinion of experts on the matter, — ^that all men whose testicles were 
not to be felt, were to be forbidden to marry ; and in 1665, the 

* The " supernumerary testicles," described by the earlier writers, rest, 
according to Forster*s certainly more correct opinion, upon inaccurate ob- 
servations. — Handb. d. spec. path. Anatomie. Leipzig, 1854, s. 249. 



256 § 7. INCAPACITY FOR PROCREATION. 

Parisian parliament still acted in accordance with this canonical re- 
gulation^ which must have affected not a few men in a most unjusti- 
fiable manner. Since, though in those cases which sometimes occur 
in which the testicles lie dose in front of the abdominal ring, they 
can be readily perceived there, this is not the case when they maintain 
their original position in the abdomen {CryjaaorchideSy Teaticondes). 
Experience proves that crypsorchides are perfectly capable of procrea- 
tion,* and there are, h priori, no physiological reasons for doubting 
this.f In such cases, when this power is disputed, and these are so 
extremely rare that none have come before me, since crypsorchia 
cannot be ascertained or proved to exist during life, all the other 
characters of virility must be the more carefully tested. One of 
those idle subtleties of which ancient forensic medicine was so full, 
was, the question whether a man deprived of both his testicles is still 
capable of procreation shortly after his castration ? Irrespective of 
the fact, that every system of laws, since the Boman one, has laid 
down limits for the duration of pregnancy (paternity), from which 
those castrated are not exempted j consequently, when a man, who 
has been castrated, completes the act of coition shortly after the 
operation, when the woman declares herself to be pregnant in con- 
sequence, and when the birth follows within the legal period (§ § 29, 
30), the man who has been castrated will in general be presumed to be 
the father, without any appeal to the opinion of experts. There are 
also other reasons why this seems to be an idle question. It cannot 
be doubted that those castrated are not at once rendered impotent. 
Peter Prank (medical police) relates the case of four (castrated) 
soprano singers, who were guilty of so many sexual misdemeanours 
with women in a small Italian town, that they were banished from 
it. Sir A. Cooper J knew a man in whom both the testicles had 
been extirpated for twenty-nine years. During the first twelve months 
this man, according to his own statement, when satisfying his sexual 
desire had ejaculations, or at least the same feeling, as if these had 
occurred. Subsequently, he had erections, though but rarely, and 

* Vide the case of a most licentious criminal who was executed, dissected 
and found to be a crypsorchide, related by Mahon, op, cit. p. 57. 

t E. Godard, Recherches sur les monorchides et les crypsorchides chez 
Vhomme, Paris, 1856 (Virchow, Archiv, &c., xii. 1, s. 128), bases his doubts 
upon the little credit to be placed in women in these matters. 

X Observations on the Structure and Diseases of the Testicle. London, 
1830. 



§ 7. INCAPACITY FOR PROCREATION. 257 

satisfied his sexual desire without any feeling of ejaculation ; after 
two years the erections were more seldom and less perfect, and they 
ceased at once on his attempting coitus. Ten years after the opera- 
tion, he told Sir Astley that during the past year he had been able 
to satisfy his sexual desires only once. Eight-and-twenty years after 
the operation, he stated that for many years his erections had been 
but seldom and imperfect. For many years he had rarely sought 
to satisfy his sexual desires, and then without result, and only once 
or twice he had libidinous dreams, without any ejaculation. A still 
more striking instance is detailed by Krahmer** A young man, 
aged twenty-two years, cut o£f both his testicles and epididymis with 
a razor. During the night, between the eleventh and twelfth day, 
he had an involuntary seminal emission. Since then (that is for 
eighteen years) the sexual power of this man has entirely ceased. — 
Supposing, however, that a man recently castrated, who is still quite 
capable of coition, may possibly beget a child at his first coitus, by 
means of the spermatic fluid still remaining in his seminal vesicles, 
we must still consider the long illness which the castrated individual 
has to suffer after the operation, the troublesome bandages, the low 
diet, &c., and we are not likely to err in thinking that his sexual 
appetite is not likely to be much excited during the first few weeks, 
and that probably before this happens nature will, as in the case just 
related, get rid of the superfluous spermatic fluid by involuntary 
emission. Moreover, there is also this other important considera- 
tion, that castration in by far the largest proportion of cases presup- 
poses a long-continued disease of the testicles, which must have long 
since made these organs unfit for the discharge of their function. 
All these facts and reasons justify the conclusion, that the question 
of the possibiUty of those castrated being able to procreate is not of 
ths slightest practical importance* 

But the existence of testicles is further only a condition necessary 
for procreation, in so far as they are the organs which prepare 
the semen, and this is a function not performed by them at all times, 
nor under all conditions ; it is physiologically confined within certain 
limits of age, and it is pathologically prevented by certain diseases 
to which these organs are liable, among which may be reckoned 
carcinoma, atrophy, cystosarcoma, tuberculosis, and enchondroma,. 
To this category also belong the diseases which pathology reckons 
as appertaining to the seminal vesicles, chronic inflammation with 

* Handbnoh der ger. Medioin. Halle, 1851, s. 276. 
VOL. III. s 



258 5 7. INABILITY FOR PROCREATION. 

hypertrophy and suppuration of their walls^ tuberculosis and carci- 
noma. The physiological obstacle of unfit age is of much more 
frequent occurrence than any pathological one, and it is much more 
difficult to give a decisive opinion regarding it, when it is asserted 
in foro. Though in general no difference is made in this respect, 
and the period of puberty is only spoken of generally as that of 
virility, yet it is certain that the power of coition begins earlier, and 
ceases later than the power of procreation. P. Zaochias'^, the Soman, 
states that the former commences at the twelfth, the latter at the fif- 
teenth year, and that Hndpotentia coeundi ceases at the seventieth year. 
In our northern climate, at least, these periods must be extended, 
and the pow^ of coition in young men must be dated from about 
the thirteenth, and the power of procreation from the fifteenth to the 
sixteenth year, while it cannot be asserted as a rule that the latter 
ceases with the seventieth year. In stating this, I place no value 
on the numerous published cases of unusually early or unusually late 
paternity, of procreation at the age of twelve, or of ninety-six, one 
hundred, one hundred and fifteen, and one hundred and eighteen 
years,t because these cases cannot stand before criticism, which it is 
nowhere more strictly requisite to attend to than in this department 
of forensic medicine. But it is a more important fact,' that Duplay 
found that the semen contained spermatozoa in thirty-seven cases out 
of fifty-one old men, nine of whom were more than eighty years 
old,J while I myself have repeatedly observed the same in men at 
the end of their sixtieth year (§ 16), and I shall presently quote a 
case in which spermatozoa were observed in the sixty-ninth year of life. 
As, however, in regard to each individual case in which this question 
is forensically raised {vide Cases XXII. to XXIV.), the variations 
in regard to the age during which capacity for procreation exists of 
' themselves present considerable difficulties, so these are increased by 
the numerous differences created by individual circumstances in re- 
gard to the usual limits of variation. It is generally known, that a 
sedentary mode of life, pampering, excitement of the imagination, 
nourishing and heating food, &c., favour and hasten sexual develop- 
ment, while aetiological circumstances of an opposite tendency retard 
it, as well as that bodily disease and debility, excess in venere, &c., 
diminish or destroy the capacity for procreation, while the opposite 

• Qumt. p. 267. 

t Vide a list of quotations by Siebenhaar, he. cit, s. 609. 

X Valentin, GruDdr. d. Physiol. 4 Aufl. 1855, s. 802. 



$ 8. INABILITY TO CONCEIVE. 259 

conditions may long preserve it. AU tltese circumstances m^t 
therefOTc be taken into consideration along with ihe period of life, 
which is the most important condition, in deciding this point in any 
given case. The medical jurist will thus indeed be often enough 
thereby placed in such a position thai he must declare the posability 
of procreation in half-grown lads or old men, even though his awn 
moral conviction, which, however, he must always suppress, should 
force upon him the strongest reasons for doubting the pretended 
paternity. In two sudi cases I was compdled to assume the 
capacity for procreation as possible in two yofong men, of whom the 
one was thirteen years and tea months old, and the other fourteen 
years and two months, both were, however, unusually early jperfectlt/ 
developed, and both were employed independently in the business of 
their fathers, although in both cases the women prd;ended to have 
been got with child by them were notoriously immoral wenches 1 {vide 
also Case XXII.). Case XXIV., detailed below, respecting a man 
aged seventy-four years, was of mwk the same character* 

§ 8. CoNTiNrATiON. — 2. Barrenness in the Temaije. 

In the same degree and with similar powers of expansion as those 
detailed m the foregoing paragraph, the limits of the duration of 
female fertiUty are capable of being more accurately determined than 
those of the male, since nature, by means of menstruation, which is 
the visible token of the separation of the germ from the ovary, and 
the cessation of this process at a more advanced period of life, has 
set eviient hmits to Uiis capacity, while the mere capacity for copu- 
lation never ceases during Kfe in the female in her general normal 
condition (§§ 8 and 6), With due regard to the accidental differences 
abeady referred to, the commencement of the prooreative power in 
girls in our dimate may be dated from the thirteenth to the fifteenth 
year, and its cessation from the fiftieth to the fifty-second year. 
Dunlop, the editor of the English edition of Beck's Handbook,"*^ saw 
in Bengal, "occasionally a mothar under twelve years of age,'' and 
states for certain that similar cases are sometimes found amoog ihe 
factory giris in the large cotton factories of Manchest^ and Glasgow, 
who work in rooms at a very high temperature, and who live in the 
most demoralising circumstances. This is credible, whilst the many 
cases reported (by Siebenhaar, &c.) of women who have produced 

♦ Elements of Med. Jurispmdenoe. London, 1825, p. 83, note, 

s2 



260 5 8. INABILITY TO CONCEIVE. 

children at the age of sixty or seventy years must give rise to the 
liveliest doubt. Devergie {Med. Ugale^ I., p. 435) relates that a man 
whose title to an inheritance^ as heir to his mother^ was disputed^ in 
the year 1754, on the ground that his mother could not have been 
the legitimate heiress of the party through whom the claim accrued, 
because her alleged mother was fifty-eight years old at the time of 
her birtl^ took counsel with the Academy who from the '' Annals 
of Medicine^' produced the following cases in his favour : '' Cornelia, 
of the family of the Scipios, bore a son at sixty years of age. 
Marsa, a physician in Venice, erred in regard to the pregnancy of a 
woman aged sixty years, whom he thought to be labouring under 
dropsy. Delamotte quotes the case of a maid aged fi%-one, who 
became a mother, she having never married from the dread of having 
children. Capuron says that, in Paris it passes for true {dc I) that a 
woman in the street de la Harpe^' (those acquainted with Paris well 
know the class of people living there, small shopkeepers, tradesmen, 
and the like) " gave birth to a daughter at the age of sixty-three/^ Are 
these observations possessed of the slightest scientific authenticity ? 
I have already stated (§ 1.) that every year cases come before us in 
which it is judicially inquired, whether an aged woman in her present 
marriage, or in a second one about to be entered into by her may 
yet probably have children ? Usually these are women approaching 
their fiftieth year, if they are not already far beyond it, and who have 
for long ceased to menstruate. Care must be taken to observe 
whether in such women the usual general proofs of commenced or 
already advanced decrepitude are present, an aged look, disappearance 
of the subcutaneous fat, withered, more or less completely absorbed 
breasts, and wasted thighs, and then taking into consideration these 
phenomena, along with the actual age, we may arrive more or less 
certainly at the conclusion that heirs of the body are no longer to be 
'' expected '^ from this woman (General Common Law). I know 
not whether the medical jurist be subject to an action for damages 
in case the result should prove his opinion to have been erroneous, 
and the woman should yet become pregnant, but I do know for 
certain, that by a careful consideration of the foregoing circumstances, 
I have not as yet been placed in such an unpleasant predicament in 
any of these cases. 

I have already mentioned the natural cessation of menstruation. 
But any mere anomaly in menstruation of whatever kind, such as its 
non-occurrence, its premature disappearance, its cessation for years. 



§ 8. INABILITY TO CONCEIVE. 261 

or extremely irregular occurrence, deviations in quantity or quality, 
&c., can never be admitted as a reason for assuming the sterility of 
the party affected. Because many undeniable instances of the occur- 
rence of pregnancy under all these circumstances have been recorded,* 
and they are also easily explained physiologically. For the haemor- 
rhage is not the most important circumstance in menstruation, this 
'^ rutting time of the human female,'^ but the evolution of the Graafian 
vesicles, the periodical maturation and separation of the ovum, com- 
bined with an orgasm of the internal genitals, which, as a rule, is 
accompanied by uterine haemorrhage. And that the source of the men- 
strual flux is the uterus, in proof of which one solitary dissection by 
Mauriceauis generally quoted, in which he found the inner lining of 
the uterus stained with blood in a female criminal hanged while men- 
struating. I might, were such proof still necessary, relate many cases 
of medico-legal dissections, made by myself, of women who had met a 
violent death while menstruating, and in whom the bloody secre- 
tion of the lining membrane of the uterus is constantly found. 

A woman must be sterile, 1. when the external or internal sexual 
organs are wholly wanting. Complete absence of the vagina is, 
however, just as rare as complete absence of the uterus, and is usually 
combined with other malformations of the internal and external 
genitals.t 2. When the organs of generation, like every other 
organ, are rendered by disease incapable of performing their natural 
function. It is true, that inability to conceive is not the result of 
every disease of the uterus and ovaries, for instance, polypi of the 
uterus or scirrhus and carcinoma of its vaginal portion do not pro- 
duce absolute sterility, but this is the result of hypertrophic or 
atrophic degeneration of the parenchyma of the uterus or of the 
ovaries, hydrovarium, &c. 3. When the spermatic fluid is pre- 
vented from reaching the ovulum. This of course includes all those 
causes which render coition impossible (§3), likewise all bodies which 
occlude the upper part of the vagina (tumours, pessaries which have 
become incrusted or in any way rendered immoveable and incapable 

• Vide Remer'fl remarks on § 494 of Metzger^s System ; Mongiardini in 
Harles u. Hitter Journal d. ausl Liter V. 2 ; Meckel's Archiv f. PhysioL 
Bd. iv. and viii. ; Flechner in the (Esterr, Med, Jahrbiicher, Bd. xxx. N°* 4. 
I myself have seen a strong, healthy peasant, aged thirty-two years, who 
during her married life had already given birth to three children, without 
ever having menstruated. This case was not forensic ; lying and simula- 
tion were therefore out of the question. 

t Kiwish klinisehe Vortrage, ii. 3 Aufl. Prag. 1857, s. 373. 



262 5 8. INABILITY TO CONCEIVE. 

of being removed without assistance); adhesion or contraction of the 
external or internal os uteris which is often so considerable as to 
prevent the entrance of any but the finest probe; complete stufBng 
of the uterus with tumours, adhesion of the Fallopian tubes, &c. It 
is also worthy of remark that, according to the observations of our 
Berlin obstetrician, C. Mayer^ a man of very lai^ experience, ante- 
flexion and retroflexion of the uterus form a relatively very frequent 
cause of sterility,* probably on account of the obstacles thus presented 
to the flow of the spermatic fluid, for Mayer found {op. cU.) that 
ninety-seven out of two hundred and seventy-two, that is more than 
one-third, women that were barren laboured under flexion of the 
uterus. In a medico-legal point of view, however, it must be 
remembered that many of iJiese asserted causes of sterility either 
cannot be diagnosed at all with any certainty during life, or only 
with great difficulty, that others are only transitory and curable, and 
that consequently the possibility of the restoration of the power of 
conception is involved in the possibility of removing the obstacle to 
conception, and further that, as experience has taught me, all these 
causes of sterility just related are scarcely ever brought forward in 
fm>, and the obstacles to conception most generally alleged are 
purely individual. Such as the already referred-to pretended ^' in- 
conqueraUe disgust '^ to the husband in actions of divorce, which is 
often sought to be sustained by the most absurd reasons ; the pre- 
tended complete absence of pleasurable sensations in the act of coi- 
tion, which is of no importance in regard to this question [vide § 1 7, 
9tih 3), &c. In all allegations respecting purely psychical causes of 
sterility, the utmost caution must be exercised in coming to a conclu- 
sion, because these allegations are wholly insusceptible of proof, and 
just for that reason are often wholly imaginary ; and further, because 
daily experience teaches us that aU purely psychical causes of (rela- 
tive) sterility, even when true, are like all other mental dispositions, 
frequently removed by the mere lapse of time. In the married life 
of the lowest classes much cruelty, arising from unnatural hate, is often 
observed most charmingly combined with numerous impregnations ! 
Other alleged causes of sterility; such as P. Zacchias' assertion that 
coitus in the standing posture prevents conception,t or what is 
stated by Hohl,t as to the escape of the spermatic fluid from the 
vagina after coitus preventing conception, are of no value in relation 
to medico-legal cases, on the one hand, because no proof of 

• C. Mayer, in Virohow's Archiv f. patii. Anat 1856, Heft 1 and 2. 
t QtuesU p. 632. j Op. cit p. 129. 



§ 9. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 263 

their truth can be obtained, and on the other because physiology is 
opposed to their correctness, since it is quite possible for the extremely 
small quantity of spermatic fluid necessary for impregnation (p. 249, 
Vol. III.) to get into the vagina, whatever the position during 
coitus, provided there be no obstacle to prevent it. 

The penal code {vide p. 238, Vol. III.) speaks also of the "de- 
privation of the power of procreation.^' But this subject will be 
returned to by and by (§ 47). 



§ 9. Illustrative Cases. 
Cases XVII. and XVIII. — Whether two Spouses are still 

WITHIN THE PrOCEBATIVE AgB? 

According to a testamentary disposition, a married couple were 
to receive the whole of a capital sum, the interest of which they had 
hitherto enjoyed (in favour of any future children), whenever 
children were no longer to be expected from them. This was the 
cause of the medico-legal examination. The husband was a physician 
of seventy-three years of age, his youngest child was b^otten 
twenty-seven years previously. '' He is a feeble man, almost tooth- 
less, with grey hair, a large scrotal hernia, and the appearance of 
complete decrepitude. His own statement, that for years he has had 
no involuntary nocturnal seminal emissions, seems therefore to be 
perfectly CTedible.^' '' As, however,^^ I went on further to state in 
my report, ^' isolated instances of procreation by men of more ad- 
vanced age have been observed, so in cases lite the present, when 
the age alone is a matter of doubt, absolute impotence must only be 
assumed with the utmost caution. I must therefore state that Dr. 
X. will most probably never beget any more children, and in respect 
of his present marriage, he must be regarded as perfectly impotent. 
For his wife is sixty-three years old, and her appearance agrees 
therewith. At the age of forty-five, tiiat is eighteen years ago, she 
says that she ceased to menstruate, which is not improbable consider- 
ing her seven confinements and the fact that this function commenced 
with her at a very early age. Mrs. X. is, moreover, a feeble, decrepit 
woman, who has not conceived for twenty-seven years, and I have no 
hesitation in declaring that she is no longer capable of conceiving. 
And in regard to the marriage of both the parties examined, I declare 
it to be my opinion, that no more children are to be expected from 
the union of Dr. X. with his present wife. 



264 § 9. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 



Case XIX and XX. — ^A similae Case. 

A similar decision had to be given in another case, in which 
§ 669 of theGeneral Common Law, detailed above (at p. 237, Vol. III.) 
came in question, as the married couple, who had not attained fifty 
years of age, desireft to adopt a child. The husband was forty-eight 
years old, of good bodily health, and perfectly normal sexual organs, 
and had of course to be unconditionally declared as not incapable of 
procreation. His wife was forty-nine years old, and had ceased to 
menstruate for three-quarters of a year, after a long period of irregu- 
larity, as is frequently the case; her muscular system was relaxed 
and withered, her breasts had half disappeared, and these circum- 
stances, coupled with the fact that this couple had been married for 
nineteen years without having any children, decided me in stating 
that no children were now to be expected from this marriage. 

Case XXI. — ^Disputed Inability to Conceive. 

I give this case, which occurred in a matter of trusteeship, not 
only because it is peculiar in itself, but also because it was the occa- 
sion of a query in rejoinder on the part of the Judge. The question 
put was, ''Is the Widow E. still capable of bearing children ?'' 
She stated to me that she was fifty-five years old, that she had ceased 
to menstruate for ten years, and that having given birth to nine 
children in the first ten years of her marriage, she had not again 
conceived during the last eight years of its subsistence. The laMa 
majora were shrivelled, the vaginal portion much shortened and atro- 
phied, and the breasts were withered and wrinkled; on the other hand 
the general appearance of the woman was comparatively unusually 
iresh, the pigment of the hair, and all her teeth were well preserved, 
and she looked like a woman of not more than forty-six or forty- 
eight years old. In accordance with all these circumstances I did 
not hold myself to be justified in saying more than that it was 
'' almost certain^^ that the Widow E. was no longer capable of bear- 
ing children ; whereby I may remark that the mode in which the 
Judge had put the question required a categorical "yes^^ or ''no'' in 
answer, and not simply the expression of an anticipation or supposi- 
tion. In truth, my " almost certain'' was not enough in this case, 
and the baptismal certificate of E,, and certificates from two of her 



§ 9. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 265 

physicians were sent to me, which completely confirmed her statements 
as to her age and previous conceptions, &c. After giving my rea- 
sons, I no longer hesitated to pronounce this woman as certainly 
incapable of any future conception. 

In a multitude of analogous cases of women proved to be more 
than fifty years of age, all of whom had either never conceived (one 
of them during thirty years of married Ufe), or had not done so for 
many years, had ceased to menstruate for a long time or for* many 
years, and displayed the general characteristics of decrepitude, it was 
always positively decided that they were no longer capable of bearing 
children. 

Case XXII. — Capacity for Procreation disputed on account 

OF Youth. 

The question was whether the gymnasiast, N., whose father objected 
to a charge of affiliation laid against his son, had been capable of pro- 
creation in the period between January and the 26th of March, 18 — ? 
I had to make the examination on the 28th of June of the following 
year, that is just one year and three months from the latest time. 
The young man was a Jew, plentifully supplied with black hair, and 
just sixteen ; consequently on the 26th of March of the previous 
year he had been only fourteen years and nine months old: he was 
strongly built, and in perfect health. His beard was just beginning 
to grow, but his voice was manly. His penis was large, perfectly 
normal, the hair on the pubis was copious, and his testicles were 
fully developed. I did not enter into any subjective particulars such 
as sexual inclinations, pollutions, &c., because I was not likely to be 
told the truth, and I declared " that nothing had been ascertained at 
the examination which would confirm the statement that the person 
examined had been incapable of procreating on the 26th of March of 
last year.^' 

Case XXIII. — Capacity for Coition and Procreation disputed 

ON ACCOUNT OF Age. 

Although the Court of Divorce, in an action against a master 
tradesman, laid before me the positive inquiry, ^^ Is X., by reason of 
his present age, fifty-seven years, rendered incapable of coition and 
procreation ?'' I nevertheless answered it negatively, for the reasons 



266 § 9. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

already giv^ (§ 2), and yet the answer was, as in every other similar 
case, perfectly satisfactory to the court The man was only fifty- 
seven years old, was therefore still within the limits of the procreative 
age, perfectly healthy, had a beard, a manly voice, a manly frame and 
habitus, a perfectly normal penis of medium size, and well-developed 
testicles in his scrotum. Accordin^y I declared that ^^ there was 
no reason to assume that X. was incap^le of coition and procrea- 
tion.''' 

Case XXIV. — Capacity for Coition disputed because op ad- 
vanced Age. 

A very peculiar case. In an action for affiliation, T., a gentleman 
living on his private means (I), was declared by an unmarried woman 
to be the father of her children, one of whom was bom on the 10 th 
of November, 1848, and the other on the 4th of November, 1850. 
The defendant stated, in reply, that he was not only at present 
^ perfectly incapable of performing coition,*' but that he had bewi 
so previous to the year 1848. The court, in its requisitbn to me, 
stated that *' to decide this action it is not of so much importance to 
ascertain whether the defendant has been capable of a fertilizing act 
of coition, that is, of an efoculatio seminU, but only whether previous 
to the 30th of January, 1848" — (the two hundred and eighty-five 
days prescribed by law in regard to illegitimate births, vide § 25) — 
" it was likely, from the bodily condition of the defendant, or any other 
cause, that his male organ was capable of erection and immission into 
the female vagina, or whether circumstances exist which justify the 
supposition that the defendant was abready in such a condition, pre- 
vious to the 30th of January, 1848, which would render erection and 
immission of his penis impossible ?'' The action was abeady pending 
in the Court of Appeal in which the defendant claimed to refer the 
matter to my decision, no easy task considering the nature of the 
query put. T., whom I examined on the 4th of April, 1853, was 
precisely on that day — ei^Aty yean of age. ^'Consequently,'' as I 
stated in my report, he was upon the 30th of January, 1848, seventy- 
fow years and nme months old. According to his own statement he 
has never been seriously ill, and he is still comparatively healthy 
considering his advanced age ; he has a fine and powerful constitution, 
a healthy complexion, and his respiration and heart's action are quite 
normal, &c. Blindness, from cataract, which necessitated a (success- 



9. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 267 

f al) operation^ and a slight swellmg of the legs were of no importance 
in p^rd to the present question. In respect of T.^s sexual capacity 
I may remark, that in two marris^es he had b^otten three children 
— ^the last of them forty years since, — and that hi^.«gemtals were 
perfectly normally formed, his penis largely developed, and his 
testicles perfectly healthy to the feel, and also that heiiad no large 
scrotal hernia, &c. Though it is generally unusual for a man of 
seventy-five to be quite capable of coition, yet individual instances of 
capacity for coition, and even for procreation, even at such an ad- 
vanced period of life, have been too often authentically observed to 
permit the unquestioned assumption of 'impotence.' I cannot, 
however, omit to point out that examples of this kind can only be 
regarded as authentic when there is no suspicion of deception, that 
is, when the course of life of the spouses place them above any sus- 
picion. And in this respect I may further remark, in a medical 
point of vkw, that in a married cohabitation between an old man 
and a woman still capable of conception, the period favourable to 
conception may be waited for, and, after many fruitless attempts, may 
at last arrive. In pretended illegitimate pregnancies the conditions 
present are perfectly different, presupposing that there is no actual 
concabinage between the parties. When T. told me, by the way, 
and solely with the intention of exhibiting the character of the 
woman he was said to have impregnated, that she had once given 
him a kick upon the belly ; presiq)posing the truth of this state- 
ment, such a circumstance would in general be Uttle fitted to increase 
the capacity for coitus of a man of seventy-five. Having regard to 
aU that has been stated, I must declare my opinion in relation to the 
question put to me to be, that it is in the highest d^ree probable 
that the defendant was already previous to the 30th of January, 1848, 
in such a state of body su9 to make an erectio et immmio penis im- 
possible.'' 

Case XXV. — ^Disputed Capactty por Procreation. 

In another case of affiliation, the question was put to me, " Does 
the journeyman shoemaker, E., labour under actual impotence and 
complete incapacity for procreation, or can it be ascertained from the 
condition of his body that he was impotent at the time when he is 
stated to have had illicit intercourse with the pursuer, that is during 
the period between the 8th of September and the 22nd of November, 



268 § 9. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

1837 ?" The statement of the defendant was wholly without founda- 
tion. He was certainly a pale sickly-looking man of (at the time of 
the inquiry) forty-eight years of age, consequently within the limits 
of the procreative age, yet, as he stated to me, he had been twice 
married and had lived childless with his two wives for a period of 
twenty-one years. He declared that in his youth he had been " at 
least ten times^^ infected with gonorrhea, and that especially during the 
last eight years he had neither had erections nor pollutions. No value 
could be placed on any of these statements, since I had no proof of 
their truth. He had, moreover, a moderate beard and manly voice, 
plenty of hair upon the pubis ; the size of his penis was moderate, 
but quite sufficient for procreation; the foreskin was quite moveable, 
and the aperture of the urethra normal ; in the wrinkled scrotum 
there lay on the right side a tolerably small testicle, and on the right 
side one considerably larger, which together with its cord presented 
nothing morbid to the feel ; there was also no symptom of paralysis 
or general nervous debility. Accordingly it must be decided ^' that 
that there was no evident reason for assuming that E. was labouring 
under actual impotence and complete incapacity for procreation, and 
that it could not be ascertained from the condition of his body that 
he had been impotent during the period between the 8th of Septem- 
ber and the 22nd of November, 1837/' 

Case XXVI. — Impregnation of a Man's own Daughter dis- 
puted ON the ground of Impotence. 

In this horrible accusation of incest the master tradesman, N., at 
that time Bixty-three years old, was charged with having begotten 
five children out of his own daughter, whom he continually most 
jealously watched ! He appealed to his age, and a previous venereal 
infection, both of which causes had made him impotent for more than 
ten years. He was of a small compact build, brunette colour, and 
appeared old indeed, but still younger than he was. His head, face, 
and pubis were plentifully covered with black hair. His voice was 
manly, his penis of unusual size, and there was not the slighest de- 
viation from the normal in his genitals. A. fine cicatrix of an incised 
cut, certainly permitted the conclusion to be drawn that a bubo had 
formerly existed, but this was of course quite unimportant for 
the present inquiry. The report, which was fully reasoned out, con- 
cluded with this opinion, " that the medical examination has revealed 



§ 9. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 269 

no reason that could justify the assumption that N. has been for ten 
years incapable of performing the act of coition and of begetting 
children/^ 

Cases XXVII. to XXX. — Accusations of Impotence by 
Wives against their Husbands. 

XXVII. — ^The married woman, E. asserted that her husband 
could never during their married bfe "produce a proper erection of 
his male organ, or an ejaculation of semen/^ and claimed a divorce. 
E. disputed this, and declared that during the last five weeks he had 
twice ''fully completed '' the act of coition with the complainant. I 
give this and the following cases, in themselves quite simple, only 
as actual proofs of the shameless assertions I have already stated 
(p. 239, Vol. III.) to be frequently made in this matter. E. was 
fifty-two years old, but from exuberant health seemed much younger. 
All the characters of manhood were present in their normal amount, 
and I had to declare '^ that there was no reason to doubt the ability 
of E. to perform the act of coition.'' 

XXVIII. — The married farmer, E., also raised an action of divorce 
against her husband, on account of inability to discharge his matri- 
monial duty. E. is just forty years old, of small but compact 
growth, he has a beard, male voice, strong growth of hair on the 
pubis, perfectly normal genitals with unusually large testicles, and 
perfect health ! Decision as in the former case. 

XXIX. — ITie married tobacconist, M., sued for divorce from her 
husband, who had become impotent from excessive onanism. He is 
forty-eight years of age, and — we said — his perfectly sound bodily 
condition and vigorous health do not evince that he has or does practice 
excessive onanism ; he has also a perfectly normal and manly-built 
body, which does not exhibit a single appearance that could justify 
the opinion, that M. is incapable of procreation or matrimonial 
congress. 

XXX. — ^The wife of a journeyman tailor, G., brought a precisely 
similar accusation against her husband. She declared that by '^ ex- 
cessive unnatural indulgence of his lust previous to marriage, he had 
rendered himself impotent,'' that, therefore, even on the bridal night, 
and also subsequently, he had attempted to induce her ^' to allow him 
to satisfy his natural desires between her nates," &c. The whole 
accusation of impotence was in this case also without foundation I 



270 § 9. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

The vigorous husband was just forty-two years erf age, was generally 
of a manly build, and had perfectly normal and healthy genital 
organs, so that the same decision had to be given as in the previous 
case! 

Cases XXXI. to XXXIIT. — Complaints op Refusal to Per- 
POEM THE Matrimonial Duty. 

XXXI. — Curious bubbles are thrown up from the low-life of 
large towns. In the Z. action for divorce, the woman sued for di- 
vorce because her husband during the four years their marriage 
had subsisted had never had matrimonial connection with her, in proof 
of which she asserted — ^that she was still a virgin. The latter fact 
was all I was required to determine, and I found that this eighUand- 
forty years old Aump-bacied woman, who had married a man now only 
twewby-^kt y€a/rs of age (on account of a few hundred thalers [100 
thders = £15 sterling] possessed by the woman), had actually a per- 
fect hymen, neither dilated nor torn, so that I had to declare, ^ that 
perfect coition with actual immission of the male oi^an had never 
been performed on the woman, Z." 

XXXII. — ^The P. action for divorce presented a precisely similar 
case. The woman sued for divOTce because of refusal to perform 
the matrunonial duty. The man asserted, that his wife laboured 
under ^'a complete and incurable incapacity^' (§ 696 of the Gen. 
Com. Law, vide p. 237, Vol. III.), and that it was impossible for 
him to have intercourse with her. The man was twenty-eight years 
old, the woman fifty-one, and they had been married for three years 
without children, but the young man had deserted his old wife just 
three months after the marriage ! ! I found the latter still a virgin, 
but perfectly nwmal and healthy, and the assertion of the husband 
was utterly baseless, 

XXXIII. — ^This case was just the reverse, for the victual-dealer, 
K., brought an action of divorce against his wife, on account of her 
obstinate refusal to perform the matrimonial duty ; the woman on her 
part asserting "that she suffered from a rupture, and that her bodily 
condition was such that she could not, at least without danger to her 
health, permit the consummation of matrimonial intercourse.'' There 
was on her left side a femoral hernia the size of a walnut, quite re- 
placeable, and scarcely visible in the supine posture. There was just 
as little reason for supposing the existence of any other bodily 



§ 9. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. [271 

obstacle to matrimonial intercourse, but rather the reverse, as the 
woman K. was well-formed, and had during her married life given 
birth to five children, the last of which was just nine months old ! 
The decision arrived at is self-evident. 

Cases XXXIV. and XXXV. — Asserted Impotence prom Mal- 
formation OP* THE Genital Organs. 

The following cases of allied impotence of the husband as the 
basis of an action for divorce, were diBFerent from those just related. 

XXXIV. — ^The victual-dealer, S., asserted, that her husband ''was 
perfectly incapable of procreating from malformation of his genital 
organs.'' The defendant contested both conclusions, and asserted, 
that especially during the last month, '' he had almost nightly had 
carnal connection '* with his wife. My examination failed to discover 
the slightest deviation from the normal in the genitals of this man, 
who was just forty-one years of age ! This determination obviated 
of course, part of the further declaration of the complainant. The man 
was powerful and healthy, of a bony build, densely covered with hair 
upon the chest and extremities, he had all the other characteristics 
of manhood, and (as I must mention) ''in regard to the power of 
erection possessed by his yard, I am the less disposed to doubt it, 
inasmuch as a disposition thereto was at once evinced upon touching 
the organ for the purpose of examining the prepuce.'' Consequ^tly, 
there was in this case no reason for assuming an incapacity for 
procreation. 

XXXV. — The merchant, H., was said by his wife in h^ action for 
divorce, to labour under the " incurable ailment " (Gen. Com. Law, 
vide p. 287, Vol. III.) of epileptic convulsions, and to be incapa- 
citated for performing his matrimonial duty because of " malformation 
of his genitals." In respect of the epileptic attacks, of course I 
explained that I must suspend my decision, since these can only be 
determined by the observation of an attack ; in regard to the asserted 
sexual malformation, however, I explained that the accusation of 
impotence against H., " because of the malformation of his genitals," 
was completely unfounded, since these organs do not present the 
slightest deviation from the normal. 



272 § 9. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

Cases XXXVI. and XXXVII. — Asserted Impotence from 
Absence op the Testicles. 

XXXVI.— In an action for divorce, the wife of a labourer, Z. 
asserted, that at their marriage, eight months ago, she discovered 
that her husband " was completely unfit for his matrimonial duties," 
and that he confessed to her " that he had no testicles.'' Her hus- 
band's incapacity was all the more unendurable to her, ''that he 
attempted to perform coitus every night for hours together, till she 
was quite exhausted, and had to put an end to these attempts by 
keeping him off wilh her whole strength." WTiat was the result of 
the examination? The husband was thirty-two years old, with a 
beard, and a manly voice, his penis was certainly unusually small, 
but in every other respect perfectly normal. "Both testicles are 
distinctly to be felt in the scrotum ! " " Since now " — ^I went on 
to say further in my repott — " a shortness of the penis is in no way 
prejudicial to the power of performing the acts of coition and pro- 
creation, and there are no other apparent causes of impotence 
present in Z., I must give it as my opinion, that there is no reason 
to suppose, that any inability to perform the matrimonial duty exists 
in Z/' 

XXXVII. — The case was different and rare enough in regard to 
the action of divorce raised by the wife of a master shoemaker, W., 
who also asserted, that in her husband " the testicles were absent/' 
and that he was, therefore, not in a position to beget children, and 
consequently under complete and incurable impotence." The husband 
was powerful, healthy, forty years of age, and possessed all the cha- 
racteristics of virility, with a somewhat largely developed penis, which 
was perfectly normal. " The scrotum, however, is only present in a 
rudimentary condition, and this rudimentary scrotum Hes high up on 
the pubis and is empty , wherefore the plaintiff has an appearance of 
right when she asserts that her husband has no testicles. But, never- 
theless, tAey are very distinctly to he felt, and of sufficient size, just 
outside the abdominal ring and close in front of it, and consequently 
are only not completely descended." We then went on to say, that 
this position of the testicles was not in the least prejudicial to the 
performance of the acts of coition and procreation. 



§ 9. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 273 

Cases XXXVIII. and XXXIX. — Assbeted Excessive Poten- 
tiality. 

The wife of a man in the middle ranks based an action for divorce 
upon the . accusation^ ^^ that her husband had abused her so fre- 
quently, and with so much violence, that a dangerous iflness had 
been thereby produced.'' In proof of her statement, she presented a 
certificate from Dr. N. N., which testified, that "she laboured under 
a morbid excitement of the nervous irritability of the uterus, and that 
this complaint might readily arise from too frequent a repetition of 
the act of coition/' The plaintiff also alleged, '^ that the penis of 
the defendant was of such exorbitant dimensions, that the object of 
marriage could not be attained;" further (! I), 'Hhat he had a set of 
false teeth, and his breath stank horribly," Being required to 
determine the truth of these assertions by an examination of both 
parties, I reported to the Court of Divorce as follows : — " 1. The 
husband is healthy, and thirty-eight years of age. His male organ 
is not of exorbitant dimensions, as asserted by the plaintiff; in the 
relaxed condition it is only of the usual thickness, and of the length 
of one inch and a-half, and must therefore be regard as small, 
rather than too large, and its size could certainly form no obstacle 
to the normal performance of the act of procreation. Further, the 
man had indeed six artificial teeth in the upper jaw ; but these are 
pivoted, very neatly made, and, contrary to the statement of the 
plaintiff, his breath gave forth no unpleasant, far less any unendurable, 
stench, so that in this respect no ' disgusting and incurable infirmity ' 
(as mentioned in the Statute, vide p. 237, Vol. III.) could be held to 
exist. 2. The wife is a very young and perfectly healthy woman. By 
a digital examination through the vagina, and by the speculum, it 
was ascertained that the uterus was slightly retrofiexed, and she 
asserted that the examination gave her pain. No swelling, sores, &c., 
that might have made this statement credible existed, and this purely 
subjective assertion of the plaintiff must, therefore, remain undeter- 
mined. In no case, however, can the alleged increased irritability 
of the uterus arise from violence inflicted during matrimonial in- 
tercourse by an exorbitantly large male organ, for the husband, as 
abeady pointed out, does not possess one of that character." 



VOL, III. 



274 I 9. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 



Cases XL. and XLI. — ^Assertbd Female StEBiLiTY (Incapacity 

FOB InTERCOUSSE). 

A subaltern official^ whose action for divorce had been in the first in- 
stance dismissed, brought forward in the Court of Appeal, the assertion 
'^ that the genital organs of the defendant were so cartilaginous, or con- 
tracted by some other cause, that even the little finger could not be in- 
troduced, that this obstruction was incurable, and that the d^endant 
was th^ebyfor ever prevented from performing her matrimonial duty/' 
It will sujffice to state, shortly, that I examined the genital organs in 
question, and found them neither ^ cjurtilaginous '^ nor " contracted,'* 
but perfectly normal, and therefore in a perfectly fit condition for 
the performance of the matrimonial duty — and deflowered to boot ! ! 

XLI.-^The painter, E., asserted in his action for divorce, that his 
wife's breath stank so insuflFerabty frwn her false t^th, and that her 
sexual organs were so malfdrmed and cartilaginous, that it was im- 
possible for irim to have matrimonial intercourse with her. '^ Both 
of these allegations are perfectly baseless. The woman, E., has 
indeed, half-a-set of teeth in the upper jaw, which, however — and I 
may remark, that she could not be prepared for my visit — she keeps 
clean, and not the slightest ill smell is perceptible from her mouth. 
Just as little was there anything anormal found in her genital 
oji^atns, though examined both digitally and ocularly. They are 
perfectiy naturally formed, the vagina indeed somewhat tight, but 
only proportionately so, for E. has been only recently married, and, as 
is evident from the condition of her body, has never given birth to a 
child. Not the slightest appearance of any " cartilaginous" condi- 
tion is to be found." Of course I declared, with due regard to the 
statutory regulations, ^* that E. did not labour under any ailment 
which was incurable, or capable of causing loathing or disgust, but 
that she was perfectly healthy, and fitted for the performance of the 
matrimonial duty." 

It is evident from the selection comprised in the foregoing cases, 
that I have been at some trouble to extract, from my cdlective 
observations a series of examples of every possible combination which 
may occur in this question, in order thereby to exhibit sufficient facts 
in proof of the doctrines laid down in the text of this chapter. For 
shortness'-sake, and to save space, I will only further remark, that 
besides the few cases already detailed, I have also met with a very 



I 9. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 275 

large number of other cases of alleged " incurable bodily ailments 
which excite loathing and disgust, or completely prevent the fulfil- 
ment of the matrimonial duty'' (§ 697 of the Law of Marriage in 
the Gen. Com. Law, vide p. 237, Vol. III.). Amongst these there 
were just as many men as women who were complained of by their 
spouses, and these pretended ^^ ailments'' comprised, stinking per- 
spiration or breath, or feet, involuntary escape of the urine, loathsome 
ulcers, and skin complaints, particularly varicose ulcers (which are of 
such common occurrence), " corrosive," or " loathsome" ^z^(?r albvs, 
ringworm, and other similar diseases of the scalp ; prolapsus of the 
vagina or uterus, and various forms of syphilis. On examining the 
individuals thus complained of, I have never, even in one single 
instance^ found the complaint substantiated and the imputed *' ail- 
ment " actually present ! ! Only once, in a married man, I found not 
exactly the " iU-smelling caries of the bone of the thigh" complained 
of, but a small fistulous ulcer which had existed for ten long years, 
but which presented no ^'^loathsome" secretion. In all of these 
cases, therefore, such an opinion had to be given as was followed by 
a dismissal of the suit. 



t2 



CHAPTEE n. 

DISPUTED LOSS OF VIRGINITY. 

Statutory Eegulations. 

Penal Code, § 142. With penal servitude for not more than five 
years shall he punished: — 1. Guardians — 2. Officials — 3. Offixnal 
physicians or surgeons charged toith, or employed in, the care of prisons, 
or other public institutions for the sich, poor, or other helpless indivi- 
duals, if they shall he guilty of any unchaste conduct with any person 
received into the institution. 

Ibidem^ § 144. With penal servitude for not more than twenty 
years shall he punished : — 1. Whosoever shall upon a person of the 
opposite sex, commit vnth violence any unchaste action for the purpose 
of gratifying sexual desire, or whosoever shall, hy threats of instant 
danger to life or limh, force another to submit to any such unchaste 
action ; 2, Whosoever, by any such unchaste gratifying of his (or her) 
sexual desire, shall ahuse any one when in a state of unconsciousness 
or inability to exercise volition; 3. Whosoever shall attempt any 
tmchaste gratifying of the sexual desire with another person under 
fourteen years of age, or shall induce him [or her) to perform orper^ 
mit any such unchaste action. If the person upon whom the crime 
has been committed shall die, the punishment shall then he penal 
servitude for life. 

Ibidem, § 145. Whosoever shall induce any woman to permit 
sexual intercourse by pretending marriage, 8fc., shall he punished hy 
penal servitude for not more than five years. 

Statute op 24th Apbil, 1854, § 1. Any woman who shall he got 
with child by rape ; 2, when in an unconscious or involuntary condi- 
tion (§ 144, 1, 2, of the Penal Code), or,^. hy a pretended marriage, 
8fc., is justified in demanding that the highest amount of damages 
prescribed vn the Gfen. Com. Law, Part 11., Tit 1., § 785, shall he 
awarded to her. 

§10. General. 
At all times and among all people, even the most civilized, female 



§ 10. DISPUTED LOSS OF VIRGINITY. 277 

virginity has been popularly regarded as the symbol of female modesty 
and morality^ for it has not always .been known that there are many 
femsde animals which also possess the organ which has from time 
immemorial been very properly regarded as the chief token of 
virginity, the hymen, which closes the entrance to the female vagina. 
The ancient Jews proudly carried about amongst the relatives the 
shift of the newly-married wife, with the bloody traces on it of the 
recent injury to the hymen, as a proof of chastity preserved till then, 
and even yet this custom, so prevalent in the East, is a popular 
custom in Naples, where the '^ shift of honour" {camiscia delPonore) 
is exhibited to the friends.* The legislators have adopted this 
popular view, and at all times and among all peoples have threatened 
the severest punishments of the law against all immoral destruction 
of virginity. Amongst the Jews, the Athenians, the fiomans, and 
by the old penal codes of the French and English the punishment 
was death, and this is even yetf the case in many of the American 
States. In Prussia, it appears, strictly speaking, as if, according to 
the present condition of the law no practical value was attached to 
the fact of actual defloration and its medico-legal diagnosis ; since 
the Penal Code never mentions the words ^' virginity'' or " deflora- 
tion,'' and only lays down the very generally worded statutory prin- 
ciples just quoted. Nevertheless, I can testify that in individual 
cases the Judge very often propounds the question of defloration, 
particularly in regard to paragraphs 192 a and 193 of the Penal 
Code having reference to injuries, in order to determine besides the 
fact of the " unchaste action," itself the subject of accusation, also 
the probable results to the body and general health of the party 
injured. Moreover, in the General Prescribing Statute, § 12, Tit. 40, 
also speaks of '^ damages for defloration," wherefore it follows, that 
even in regard to civil law the diagnosis of virginity is practically 
important. The same is the case in all those actions for divorce 
(Cases XXXI. and XXXII.) in which complaint is made by the 
wives of impotence or refusal to perform the matrimonial duty, sup- 
ported by an appeal to the continued existence of their virginity. 
Authors have written much about a physical and a moral virginity, J 

♦ Mayer, Neapel tmd die Neapolitaner, I. Oldenburg, 1840, s. 319. The 
author has long been a resident in Naples. 

t At least this was the case thirty years ago. Vide Beck's Elements of 
Med. Jurisp. London, 1825, p. 65. 

I The French, indeed, have different words for these conditions— 
Pucellage and VirginitL 



278 5 11. DIAGNOSIS OF VIRGINITY. 

A man must be voy inexperienced in medico-legal matters to set up 
such a distinction as serviceable. No experienced medical jurist 
will in any case rely upon one sign alone, and will certainly not in 
this instance base his diagnosis solely upon tiie presence or absence 
of the hymen (§§ 11 and 12), which is doubtless what is intended; 
and, on the other hand, these authors by their own words are bound 
to show how a forensic physician can determine the intangible 
existence of a mowd virginity, the estimation of which is, however, 
in any case more incumbent on the Judge than the physician. 

§ 11. Diagnosis of Virginity. 

1. Since the condition of the female breasts undergoes material 
alterations even by the frequent consummation of intercourse, and 
still more by pregnancy and child-bearing, so a comparison of these 
alterations with the original conditions of the breasts affords a means 
of diagnosis worthy of consideration. The breasts of a stiU youthful 
and healthy virgin are generally, in relation to the rest of the body, 
not too largely developed ; they are firm and compact, somewhat 
conical, with the nipple as apex, the nipple itself but slightly deve- 
loped. It is just as indecorous as it is unimportant to examine the 
erectility of the nipple ; this ought therefore never to be done. The 
nipple is surrounded by a narrow areola, which even in persons with 
dark hair and complexion possesses no depth of colour, but is 
generally of a bright, rosy-red. But of itself, the condition of the 
breasts is of no probative value; because after the prime of youth is 
passed and more and more as years advance, the more the general 
freshness and fulness of body disappears, the more do the breasts 
become withered and pendulous. (A similar condition is often 
observed after frequent and long-continued sexual intercourse.) 
Further, the colour of the areola is not at all altered by deflora- 
tion, but only by conception. 

2. Tie hymen, — A comparison of very many virgins shows that 
the form of the hymen is extremely various ; and this is of great 
practical importance, since a want of attention to these varieties, and 
a-holding fast to the idea of its semicircular form, has very probably 
been the reason why medical men have occasionally given erroneous 
opinions as to its existence. The hymen is just as frequently com- 
pletely circular as crescentic. Moreover, its edges are sometimes 
quite narrow, at others a whole line in breadth ; the opening may be 



§ 11. DIAGNOSIS OF VIRGINITY. 279 

circular or oYaL The membrane in all its forms may be loose and 
yielding, or tense and firm, or even fleshy, which is peculiarly likely 
to mislead. Other varieties described by observers of such great 
experience as F« B. Osiander and others, such as a ligulate hymen, 
or one consisting of several bands^ a double hymen, &c., I myself 
have never seen, tiiough the number of my observations both on 
living and dead bodies is extremely great. Li children, provided no 
violence has been inflicted on the genitals, the membrane is easily 
discov^ed (§ 14) ; in adults individual circumstances may laise 
doubts. Thus in one case we had to make a very careful examina- 
tion, to ascertain whether a young and powerful woman, shot by her 
sweetheart, was still a virgin. This she <«rtainly was, but a small 
prolapse of the anterior waU of the vagina through the much-dilated 
opening in tbe circular hymen presented a very deceptive appear- 
ance. Of itself^ moreover, the existence of tbe hymen does not 
prove virginity, since that a single or even several acts of coition 
does not always destroy it is very well known to thousands of married 
men, and is a matter of experience in those not extremely rare ^^ases 
where pregnancy has been observed coexisting with a hymen 
(Walter, Hellmann, Osiander, Nagde, Fod^re, Kriiger, Heim, 
Bibke, and Case XLVII.), cases which are perfectly explicable from 
our present knowledge of the physiology of procreation. Such a 
coincidence, however, can never rend^ the diagnosis difficult, since 
this can be assisted, in spte of the preservation of the hymen, by 
making use of the signs of pregnancy. In other cases the hymen is 
only partially torn and not quite destroyed (§ 14). I must, however, 
confess that, on the other hand, the hymen is sometimes completely 
absent, without any precursory sexual defloration, particularly where 
an operation has been performed, or where excessive onanism has 
been practised. The oft-alleged possibility of the destruction of the 
hymen by riding, leaping, dancing, and the like, must be, when we 
consider the deep internal position of the membrane, placed along- 
side of the alleged venereal infection of men by strange privies, &c. ; 
and if Eodere and Belloc mean to assert that the hymen may be torn 
by the passage of clots during menstruation (!), yet we must not be 
thereby led astray in determining the value of this sign, which is the 
most valuable of all m a diagnodic poifU of view,* The caruncula 

* The experienced Devergie very correctly says {op, cit, p. 346), that when 
a hymen is not fomid, in nine hundred and ninety-nine cases out of a 
thousand defloration has actually occurred. 



280 § 12. DIAGNOSIS OF VIRGINITY. 

myrtifarmes, which remain after the destruction of the hymen, occur 
in various forms. If they are recent, they appear as two, three, or 
more small excrescences, more or less reddened and irritated, on each 
wall of the vagina; when older they become withered and smaller, 
and at last can scarcely be recognized at all. It is important to pay 
attention to these differences, because the medical jurist may be 
asked not only f/^ defloration has taken place, but when this has hap- 
pened ? In regard to this question Devergie and others have very 
properly observed, that when the defloration has happened long pre- 
viously, no definite time for its occurrence can be decided on {vide 
§ 14). I regard the possibility of the restoration of the hymen after 
its destruction as one of the many fables which have been related 
of it. 

§ 12. Continuation. 

3. In the virgin state, particularly after puberty, the labia major a 
lie close to one another^ and completely cover the nymphse and 
cHtoris ; previous to puberty the clitoris is often somewhat visible. 
The difference between this condition of the genitals and that which 
is the result of long-continued sexual intercourse, or of childbearing 
— the difference between the full, tolerably firm, and closely-shutting 
labia majora of the former state, and the gaping, withered, dirty 
brownish-yellow labia, between which the withered and often hyper- 
trophied nymphse depend, of the latter, is certainly very evident. 
Not so, however, the transition; the position and condition of the 
labia are not very visibly altered by one, or even by several cohabita- 
tions. 

4. The same may be said in regard to the tightness of the vagina, 
which in first pregnancies is frequently very remarkable even in youth- 
ful marriages, and after very frequently repeated coitus. The existence 
of rtigce in the vagina can scarcely be called a diagnostic proof of 
virginity, since sometimes they scarcely exist at all, even though the 
hymen is still present, as may be ascertained by examination on the 
dead body, though during life this must be omitted in such cases lest 
we thereby deflower the woman ourselves. Besides such an exami- 
nation would be perfectly superfluous, since the rugose condition of 
the vagina is only removed by the first birth, and not merely by 
sexual intercourse. 

5. All these reasons are also opposed to the value of the trans- 



§ 12. DIAGNOSIS OP VIRGINITY. 281 

verse position of the os externum uteri y which certainly continues till 
after the first pregnancy (I have observed it in the body of a virgin 
of sevenly-three years of age), and it is not therefore altered merely 
by unfruitful intercourse, and moreover cannot be ascertained when 
the hymen is preserved. Not the slightest value is to be placed 
upon any of the other more recent or more or less ancient appear- 
ances on the female body, which are said to prove the integrity of 
virginity. No value can be assigned to the ^' fresh rosy lips, and 
bright beaming eyes, with a free yet modest look,^'"**" which vary too 
much with the individual; and still less to the old Eoman sign of 
matronhood — ^the swelling of the neck after defloration — which made 
it a marriage custom to measure the throat before and after the 
nuptials ;t nor to the alleged alteration in the perspiration, or the 
stream of the urine, &c., sjrmptoms in proof (!) of the value of which 
quotations are to be found scattered throughout the ancient medJicma 
forensis, which must, however, be regarded as the ruins of a long 
decayed science. 

The subject of disputed virginity must never be examined during 
menstruation, as then the ocular inspection is disturbed, and the 
genital organs are in an altered condition. And no medical jurist 
must hesitate to cause the rising of a court, by refusing on proper 
occasions to carry out the examination when called upon to do so 
during its session, as I myself have done more than once. The 
illustrative cases (§18) will contain a selection of cases, in which the 
reporting experts had (as is quite excusable in inexperienced persons) 
arrived at an erroneous conclusion, which had subsequently to be 
officially confirmed or rectified, and both conscience and a sense of 
the dignity of the position of a forensic physician, demand on the 
occurrence of such cases that we do not hesitate to do as has been 
recommended, but at once decline to examine at present, and move 
for permission to do so subsequently. For cases in which it is re- 
quisite to examine as speedily as possible (§ 13 to § 15), do not of 
course occur at the time of trial, for this, from the nature of the case, 
does not take place till long after the perpetration of the deed and 
the close of the preliminary investigation. 

Not assenting to that unfounded scepticism which has been 
asserted in regard to this question, both in earlier and more recent 
times, I must declare, that where a forensic physician finds a hymen 

J3TILL PRESERVED, EVEN ITS EDGES NOT BEING TORN, AND ALONG 
• Hohl, op, ciw^. p. 114. t CoUum drcumdare Jilo. — Martial. 



282 § 13. RAPE. 

WITH rp (in young persons) a vibgin condition of the bbeaj9TS 

AND EXTEBNAL GENITALS, HE IS THEN JUSTIFIED IN GIVING A POSI- 
TIVB OPINION AS TO THE EXISTENCE OF VIEGINITY, AND vice Verfid, 

§ 18. Eape. 

In oommoQ language sexual intercourse with a woman f^ainst hear 
will is termed Rape. For tlie ends of criminal law, however, it is of 
impi^rtance to ascertain whether this act has been merely attempted 
or completed, whether craft and seduction, or force have been em- 
ployed, whether the woman was in such a state of mind as to be 
capable of giving her consent or not.*^ &c. Thus the signification 
attached to tiie word rape has been variously interpreted by teachers 
and legislators in criminal law, and whoever takes an interest in this 
matter will find that in the penal codes of Brunswick^ Hanover, 
Saxony, Baden, Wirtemberg, Darmstadt, Bavwia, and Oldenburg, 
carnality with persons in an involuntary or unconscious condition, or 
with idiots or insane persons, is separated from rape, and reckoned as 
violation, because the word rape always includes the idea of violeuce 
or threats of violence ; and that all the more recent penal codes 
regard unnatural carnality attended with violence as analogous to 
rape, or as rape in the evident sense of the word, or as violation.^ 
Discussions in regard to this purely judicial matter do not belong to 
forensic medicine, and the Prussian forensic physician has all the less 
practical int^est in it that the penal code of his country never once 
mentions the word rape. But it speaks continually, as I have already 
pointed out (p .284, Vol. III.), of " sexual intercourse,^' in § 145, of 
" unchaste actions'' by guardians, ofiScials, physicians, &c. in regard 
to certain persons in § 142, and, finally, " unchaste actions for the 
purpose of satisfying the sexual desire," in § 144. As to all that is 
to be included in the latter very wide expression, that is, on our part 
to be left to the lawyers, many of whom very properly regard it as 
an evidence of great wisdom in the legislator that he has made his 
language so comprehensive. It is equally judicious that by the em- 
ployment in § 144 of the words " a person of the opposite sex" every 
doubt which might arise from the words of oiir former p^ial code is 
removed, as to whether a rape might be committed by a female on a 
male, and punished accordingly ? I myself had to examine a boy aged 

* Haberlin. Qrundsatze des Griminalreohtes III. Leipzig, 1848, s. 268. 
CEsterreichisohes Strafgesetzbudi, § 125, 127, 128. 



§ 13. RAPE. 



283 



six years^ whose chaste and modest-looking nurse had often taken him 
into bed with her^ and to appease her desires had placed him upon 
her breast and genitals, whereby he had become infected witti a 
gonorrhoea, which she had contracted by secret intercourse with 
her sweetheart ! In another far more horrible case, a married woman 
had abused her own son, aged nine, in satisfying her unnatural lusts ; 
on his body, however, nothing could be discovered, either locally or 
generally ! As thus no sex is safe, so neither is any age secure from 
rape or " unchaste actions for the purpose of gratifying the sexual 
desires.'* X., a manufacturer of serge, aged twenty-sevenyears, met (in 
spring, in the beginning of May) W., a widow aged dxt^-eigU years, 
just outside one of the gates of Berlin, and, after unbuckling a leather 
strap from his trousers, he proposed to have intercourse with her. As 
she refused, he struck her with the strap and buckle upon h^ left 
temple, but hurt her only slightly. The woman thus abused came 
before us for examination as an old decrepit woman with hw face 
horribly marked with the small-pox I Such cases are, however, 
always the rarest, whilst naturally most unchaste actions of every kind 
are committed by young and — ^very frequently — ^by old men upon 
young women and female children. Up to the close of the year 
1858, I have examined one hv/ndred and thirty -six individuals few 
rape which had been committed upon them : amongst these there 
were — 

From 2i (1) to 12 years old 

20 
8 
7 
1 
1 



12 


,, 14 


15 


» 18 


19 


„ 25 




47 




68 



136 



Thus nearly seventy-three per cent, were little children under twelve 
years of age ! ! , 

The medical jurist cannot proceed too cautiously in all such cases 
in making his examination and delivering his opinion, for not only 
may the most unfounded accusations, based upon the meanest mo- 
tives, of which P. Zacchias long since published examples, and which 
occur in every country and at all times, may impose upon a man of 
Uttle experience, who has not yet learned by long intercourse with 
the dregs of the people, how far human corruption and degradation can 



284 § 13. RAPE. 

go, but also errors in regard to particular signs are very easily 
possible, and an accurate knowledge and estimation of these is there- 
fore of the utmost importance. But the decision of this question in 
medico-legal practice presents another difficulty in the circumstance 
that almost in every case the examination of the party said to have 
been abused, as may be readily understood of a matter proceeding 
from the police to the law courts, has to be undertaken by the me- 
dical jurist at a period so long after the commission of the deed that 
often the most decisive effects upon the body are obscured or com- 
pletely obliterated. Devergie"**" has most correctly said, "En matvere 
de viol une defloration est deja ancienne au bout tfe 9 i 10 jours," 
But not only is it nine or ten days but generally much later when 
the party in question is brought forward for examination, which the 
physician must then at least carry out as promptly as possible. 

What connection then can those other assertions, which we find in 
text-books, have with the actual occurrences of forensic life, such as 
when we read in Menders Handbook, and even in more recent ones, 
that for the purpose of determining the occurrence of rape, we should 
examine vsith care whether buttons are wanting on the coat of the 
alleged violator; whether the clothes of the party violated be in dis- 
order ; whether they are muddy, and if so, whether the mud resemble 
that of the earth where the deed is said to have been perpetrated ! Why 
not rather, whether the bed-feathers on the dress of the woman cor- 
respond with those of the bed in question ! How evident is it from 
this, that here again authors have attempted to replace their own 
deficient experiences with fanciful dogmas of their own setting-up. 
They forget that the alleged violator is often quite unknown, that 
when he is known he denies the deed, and has long before he is 
brought forward, replaced the treacherous " wanting button,^' that 
the clothes of the party alleged to be violated can be no longer either 
in disorder or muddy, because in actual forensic practice, she is not 
brought forward for inspection till after the lapse of several weeks or 
months, or even after many months, &c. 

An examination at this very late date, may make it quite impos- 
sible for the medical jurist to give a decided opinion, particularly 
when, as has happened to myself, the question arises, token did this 
defloration occur? The answer to this may be of the highest im- 
portance to the Judge, as when the ^' unchaste action " took place 
in that period so important in a criminal point of view, "previous to 
* Op. ctL p. 348. 



§ 14. THE LOCAL SIGNS OF RAPE. 285 

the fourteenih year/' and the woman is nowy at the period of the 
examination, far beyond this age (Cases LXVII. to LXIX.). 

§14. Continuation. — Diagnosis. — [a) The Local Signs. 

When it is required to decide, whether an illegal carnal contact 
of the genital organs, with results more or less allied to sexual 
intercourse, has occurred, in the first place we must ascertain, whether 
any such disproportion between the genital organs of both parties is 
to be presupposed as would lead us to expect the infliction of con- 
siderable violence on the female, as is the case with children; or 
whether this is not the case, as in adults, who, however, have pre- 
served their virginity up to the time of the commission of the deed ; 
or finally, whether the party injured has long ceased to be a virgin, 
and the genitals have been long accustomed to the iramission of a 
foreign body. In the first instance, all the signs of so-called rape 
will be found upon the body; in both of the latter a few of them 
may still be found, provided the examination is made as speedily as 
possible after the alleged commission of the deed. These signs 
comprise : — 1. Inflammatory redness, or even sHght excoriation of 
the mucous membrane in the imtroitus vagvuce, the effect of the con- 
siderable friction ; this is never absent in children, and commences 
very shortly after the conmiission of the deed, but may last several 
weeks, especially if no proper medical treatment be employed to 
subdue it. A similar inflammatory irritation rnay arise from catarrhal 
causes; in combination, however, with other symptoms this sign 
will never mislead. In adults, virgins up to the time of the com- 
mission of crime, this appearance is either not found at all, or only faint 
traces of it ; in those previously deflowered it is never observed. 2. 
A mucO'pv/rulent secretion from the mucous membrane of the vagina, 
which secretes more or less copiously a greenish-yellow, more or less 
viscous discharge, which soils the Unen very much ; in colour and 
consistence it is not to be distinguished from the usual discharge of 
the primary stages of a gonorrhoea, and it is particularly apt to be 
mistaken for the result of an actual gonorrhoea! infection, when, as 
sometimes happens, the mucous membrane of the urethra is also 
affected and likewise secretes a discharge. This appearance is ex- 
tremely important, since it is almost constantly found specially 
and particularly in children from the twelfth to the fourteenth year, 
whenever the genital organs have met with any rough usage by an 



286 § 14. THE LOCAL SIGNS OF RAPE. 

atteiiq>t at lape or otherwise. Bat this discharge may itself lead 
to a mistake^ in so far as it may have induced the idea that the vio- 
lator must be affected with gonorrhoea, for very often when he is 
known, and particularly at that late period when such cases so 
frequently come for the first time to the cognition of the medical 
jurist, he is found to be in perfect health, and the advocate for the 
defence is thereby famished with the means of making a total 
denial of the deed credible. In many other cases, the men accused 
were only found to have an anusoal moisture in the urethra, so that 
a few drops of transparent mucos could be squeezed out, and also a 
few slight stains on the linen, just as is found in the last stage of ure- 
thral blennorrhoea, but is not unusually found in men as the result of 
catarrhal or other causes (Firf^ Coses LXXVIII. to LXXXII.). 
From the observation of a large number of such cases, I have long 
since been convinced that the mucous membrane of the child is far 
more susceptible to the contagion of gonorrhoea tiian that of the 
adult, and that even in the later stages of this disease infection is 
readily produced in children. In doubtful cases, the diagnosis is 
more certain where we cjm make sure that the urethral mucous 
membrane \% the sole source of the discharge. It is, however, 
extremely difficult to determine this in children, and often quite 
impossible without injuring the hymen, which the forensic phy- 
sician is not justified in doing. The secretion may be, however, 
not virulent, but purely the result of the traumatic inflammation of 
the mucous membrane, when, as is very often the case, the injuring 
body has been only the finger of the accused. Finally, the usual 
catarrhal, scrofulous, or verminous vaginal blennorrhoea, which is of 
no infrequent occurrence in children of the lower classes, particularly 
when cleanliness and care are neglected, may be mistaken for gonor- 
rhoea* The general habitus and state of health of the child, with an esti- 
mation of the other signs upon its body will make the diagnosis easier. 
In the case of adults, such traumatic blennorrhoea is no longer to be 
expected. 3. Haemorrhage or dried blood upon the genital organs 
or in their neighbourhood, is an appearance which is generally absent 
in the case of young children, but which on the other hand, is 
always foimd in adults, till then virgins, when examined shorfly 
after the commission of the deed, when defloration has actually oc- 
curred, and the vessels of the hymen have been ruptured. It is 
evident, that in regard to this appearance mistakes may arise in two 
ways. In cases of false accusation, the genitals and the linen may 



§ 14. THE LOCAL SIGNS OF RAPE. 287 

be intentioiiallj soiled with blood, in order to gire an appearance of 
truth to the complaint, while in persons within the Hmits of the 
menstruating age menstrual haemorrhage may be all the more 
readily mistaken for traumatic, that there is no distinguishable differ- 
ence between the two kinds of blood. The best of our more recent 
dbservers, Bouchardat, Henle, Whitehead, J. Vogel, Donne, Leuck- 
hart, Scanzoni, and others, are all unanimous in stating, that 
menstrual blood is precisely similar in composition to ordinary blood, 
and that it possesses the albumen, the salts, and even the fibrine of 
ordinary blood, which was formerly denied ; and the latter fact I my- 
self can confirm.* But the possiWlity of the hemorrhage proceeding 
from either of these sources is to be set aside> when the other appear- 
ances found are opposed to it. That an utterly ignorant physician may, 
moreover, be otherwise deceived is proved by a case very well-known 
to myself, and related by Romberg^ in which a Berlin medical man, 
since dead, certified that he had found on examination blood-coagula 
upon the genitals of a child, and seminal stains upon its shift, the 
result of a rape committed upon it, the most superficial examination 
in once showing that the coagulated blood was — ^plum-juice and the 
seminal stains-^grease spots, the result of some pastiy which the child 
had eaten in bed the previous evening before falling asleq) !t 4. A 
recent complete destruction of the hymen, or (what is nowhere men- 
tioned, and is yet much more frequently found in young girls than this) 
one or several lacerations in the edges of the hymen. The hymen 
is quite easily discovered in uninjured children^ but it is difficult and 
often almost impossible to find it when the small and delicate 
genitals have been actually injured by some sexual brutality, whether 
with the penis or finger, &c., and are irritated and inflamed, eq)e- 
cially if an examination is attempted within the first few days, or 
even some weeks subsequently. The pain on s^rating the tiiighs 
and touching the genitals with the hand is so irritating to the 

• Robin (Annales cP Hygiene, publ. 1858, n. p. 421, &o.) asserts that 
menstrual blood, besides the usual elements of blood, also contains a mix- 
fare of uterine and vaginal epithelial cells and of mucous globules, i^oh 
are not to be found in blood flowing from a blood-vessel. In regard to the 
question of rape, howeyer, tills appearance is of no importance, for, as the 
elements just referred to are present in the vagina even during the absence 
of menstruation, so blood from that source may exhibit them, even when 
menstruation is not present. But this proof may be employed in the case 
of stains produced on the linen by blood from a different source. 

t Vide the case related in Casper's Woohenschrifty 1838, s. 234. 



288 § 15, THE GENERAL SIGNS OF RAPE. 

children, particularly when they are quite young, and their restless- 
ness is so great, that we are often forced to desist for a time, or as 
may happen, to content ourselves with a rapid and superficial glance, 
which very JreguetUly jprove^ deceptive. Of this, the illustrative cases 
will afford proof (Cases XLII. to XLVI.). Moreover, in little 
children the hymen is almost never found destroyed, particularly 
when manipulation with the finger alone has not been employed, but 
with the male organ, because from the extreme tightness of the 
vaginal canal, even the extremity of the glaus cannot reach the 
point of insertion of the hymen. For this reason, I can with truth 
assert, that in spite of the large number of these observations I have 
made upon children, I have never once observed any "laceration'^ 
of the genitals (Henke). In adults recently deflowered, the exami- 
nation of the hymen is easier and more productive of results, and a 
recent laceration of this membrane is not difficult to distinguish 
from one of older date, as I have already remarked in § 11. 

§ 15. Continuation. — (i.) General Signs. 

5. The inflammatory irritation of the external genitals, which ex- 
tends to the neighbouring organs, makes it explicable that an abnost 
never-failing result of violence inflicted upon the female genitals is a 
difficulty in walking which is attended by an instinctive separation of 
the thighs. This is observed not only in children, in whom this 
remarkable symptom, which, from being unknown to the public is 
very rarely simulated, is either observed or is reported by the relatives 
as having been present, but also in adults in whom defloration has 
been completed, even where, as after marriage, this has been done 
with full consent ; but in adults it disappears in a few days, fre- 
quently the very next day, whilst in little children it is observed for from 
eight to fourteen days. The same may be said — 6. in regard to pain 
in making water or passing faces , whereby prudence demands that 
we do not forget that these subjective statements cannot be objec- 
tively determined. The basis for an opinion is to be found in the 
appearances on the body just related, but further investigations may 
render this easier to arrive at, and especially in difficult and doubtful 
cases may confirm it. We place less value in this respect in general 
upon, 7. Injwries on the person of the party abused, scratches, 
ecchymoses, stabs, &c. In children, for evident reasons, they are 
never found; but they do certainly occur in adults, who with full 



§ 15. THE GENERAL SIGNS OF RAPE. 289 

consciousness have fought with their assailant. A young swineherd 
attacked a girl feeding geese in the fields, and at first she defended 
herself, he stabbed her in the arm with her own bread-knife, where- 
upon she got frightened and stupified, and submissive to his design. 
But a struggle of this nature does not always leave traces behind it, 
when, for instance, the woman by a vigorous attack is thrown down 
with all her clothes over her head, &c., the traces of injury may be 
confined, as in the horrible Case LI., to an unimportant scratch of a 
pin. To this I may add that traces of trifling injuries, such as 
scratches of pins, finger-nails, &c., have usually quite disappeared by 
the time of the subsequent examination. Knally, nothing is easier, 
and it has often been done, than to produce artificially and inten- 
tionally such appearance of injuries, so as to make the statements of 
the accusing party appear more credible. 8. In this difficult question, 
in regard to which the coarsest deceptions are, as I must so often 
say, so frequently attempted, I must urgently point out the impor- 
tance of making a psychologicaly as well as a somatic diagnosis. 
Whenever it is possible, the party to be examined must be taken by 
surprise, so that she may be unprepared when visited for the purpose 
of examination. We must accurately go over the report of the 
alleged occurrence with its obvious inconsistencies ; we must ask our- 
selves. What sort of woman is this ? and we shall thus frequently 
obtain important, perhaps even decisive, hints, of which Case LVIII. 
affords proof. In another case, in which a young woman hawking 
fish, in an open basket on her arm, was attacked and violated in a 
garden, from which she said that she afterwards fled in haste, — ^no 
inconsiderable importance was attached to the fact, that neither the 
basket nor one single fish was lost or left behind when the deed 
was conmiitted. As part of the psychological diagnosis in regard to 
children alleged to have been violated, which, almost without excep- 
tion, belong to the lower classes, I reckon the sharp observation of 
the behaviour of the mother or other relatives, and of the child her- 
self at the examination. This is a most important point ! We must 
be strictly careful not to cross-examine the child, but permit both 
the child and her mother to make their statement freely. Important 
hints will be thus often obtained. In numerous cases, I myself have 
seen Httle but wide-awake children with the utmost unconstraint or 
impudence, drawl out a full description of the commission of the 
deed down to the most minute particulars — sit venia verho^ so that 
little sagacity was required to recognise it as a lesson dictated and 

VOL. III. u 



290 § 16. THE EXAMINATION OF THE LINEN. 

learned by hearty and it has very seldom happened that the objective 
appearances in such cases did not confirm my suspicion. 9. Finally^ 
even a negative proof may be so far decisive in r^ard to questions 
of rape> when an actual defloration is pretended to have occurred at 
the time of the commission of the deed, whilst the examination 
shows, that the party concerned could not have be^i a virgin at that 
time, as she must have before then given birth to a child. A most 
instructive example of this is detailed in Case LI. 

§ 16. Continuation. — (c.) The Examination op the Linen. 

It is of the greatest importance for the diagnosis of this illegal 
mode of satisfying the sexuiid desires, to make in every case an accu- 
rate examination of the body- and bed-linen, which was in contact with 
the body (in both sexes, vide § 18) at the tune of the alleged 
violation, and I have been const-smtly in the habit of making this 
examination, both in the judicial cases which come before me here, 
and also very often in others intrusted to me by foreign judicial 
boards, who for that end send the Unento me. These investigations 
are directed to the discovery of blood and human semen ; and I have 
already fully detailed the mode in which they ought to be carried out 
in §§ 43 and 45, pp. 196 and 204, Vol. I. Blood-stains upon 
pieces of white linen are tolerably easily recognised even by the unaided 
eye, and the use of the microscope gives complete certainty. On 
the other hand, for the diagnosing of stains of semen in linen, the 
appearance, the finger (by rubbing the linen), and the nose (by 
smelling the linen after it has been rubbed or moistened in water), 
are perfectly untrustworthy means. For, besides that mucus, pus, 
gonorrhoeal discharge, &c., are very apt to be mistaken, the human 
semen is not always the same; and for instance, the seminal fluid of 
a young, strong, and healthy man leaves quite another stain, from 
the watery s6men of an old or sick man; a larger or smaller 
aifnixture of the prostatic fluid causes the stain to have a different 
appearance ; finally, it is several years * since I first pointed out a 
dijBSculty in regard to this investigation, which has since been recog- 
nised and acknowledged by subsequent authors. In such cases, 
namely, the medical jurist has not given him for examination the 
fine, white, often changed, and therefore, clean shirts of the higher 
classes, but almost without exception coarse linen, worn-out shirts^ 
• Casper's Vierteljahrsohrift, Bd. I. s. 50. 



§ 16. THE EXAMINATION OF THE LINEN. 291 

soiled with every possible kind of filth and colonring-matter, in which 
nothing distinctive can be seen, and the microscope alone can solve 
onr doubts. By continuous observations of this character I have 
arrived at a most remarkable result, which does not indeed altogether 
invalidate my former dogma, that when no spermatozoa are to be 
found in the suspicious stain, the medical jurist must declare that 
there is no proof that the stain examined has been caused by semen,* 
but certainly requires it to be modified. It has, namely, struck me 
more and more in examining cases of alleged rape in which the 
examination of the female, the appearance of the linen, and finally, 
all the circumstances of the individual case, according to all experi- 
ence, justified the assumption of an actual ejaculation of semen 
having occurred, that yet this suspicion was not confirmed by 
the results of a microscopic examination, inasmuch as, even after 
repeated attempts, no spermatozoa could be found in the suspicious- 
looking stain. The consideration now, that in many animals, 
particularly in birds, the seminal fluid does not always contain 
spermatozoa, but only at the rutting period, that these animalculae 
are not developed in hybrids,t and the experience that the seminal 
stains in the linen in apparently similar circumstances by no means 
always exhibit the same colour and consistence, and have a different 
appearance in the case of young and healthy, than in that of old 
and sick men, &c. Finally, the fact that, Duplay, in his observations 
(p. 104), out of fifty-one old men, fourteen times found no animal- 
culae in the semen, occasioned me to undertake new investigations, 
which are not as yet very numerous, since they have only been 
recently commenced, but which have abeady afibrded very remarkable 
results, and have proved what I suspected to be the case. I relate 
the following observations : — 

Numerous spermatozoa were found in the following cases : — 
1, and 2. Four vigorous journeymen butchers were suffocated in 
carbonic oxide gas. They were all between twenty and twenty-five 
years of age. The seminal vesicles were examined in all of them. 
In A. the spermatozoa were in the Tisual number, in D. they were 
still more plentiful. For the two others, vide under No. 12 
and 13. 

8. A trust-worthy observer. Dr. Abel, staff-surgeon at K., who 

* Thanat. TheiL 2 Anfi. s. 221. It lias been modified in the Third 
Edition, vide VoL I. p. 206. 

t J. Mtiller, Handb. d. Physiol. II. 1840, s. 637. 

U2 



292 S 16. THE EXAMINATION OF THE LINEN. 

had previously acquired when in Berlin an interest in this subject^ had 
the remarkable opportunity of observing a number of spermatozoa in 
an invalid, aged ninety-^ yearSy who died in the Invalid Hospital 
at K., and this case he has kindly communicated to me. 

4. The carriage-vamisher, E., who was just sixty-five years old, 
but who looked seventy from his emaciation, thin and snow-white 
hair, and the loss of almost all his teeth, and who had killed himself 
by slitting open his belly, had numerous zoosperms in his vesicles. 

5. An invaUd, aged sixty-eight, who died of fracture of the pelvis, 
five days after having been run over by a carriage, had a large 
number of zoosperms in his vesicles. His figure was powerful. Hair 
and beard grey. Teeth tolerably well preserved. The unusual length 
of the penis of this body was remarkable. 

6. Numerous, but small zoosperms were found in a gigantic shoe- 
maker, aged thirty-five, who was affected with gonorrhoea, and had 
hanged himself. 

7. A vigorous naturalist, sixty years of age, a married man, and 
father of a lai^e family, and accustomed to the use of the microscope, 
whom I had interested in this question, examined with me for some 
time continuously his own semen after coitus. Here we found the 
greatest variations, which were accurately noted by both of us to- 
gether. After coitus on the third day, reckoning from the last perform- 
ance of the act, there was a large number of very small spermatozoa : 
after renewed coitus on the fourth 62ij few and small; after a pause 
of only two days none; after a pause of only one day there was only 
a watery sperrm, in which no zoosperms were found. At another time, 
on the fifth day after the last coitus, the zoosperms were very nu- 
merous : another time, after a pause of six days, they were few but 
large in size ; four months after the last examination, and seventy- 
two hours after the last act, the zoosperms were comparatively very 
small, and at another time, on the third day after the last act, they 
were innumerable. Immediately after coitus, and before emptying 
the bladder, the urethra was twice examined. Twenty-four hours 
after the last act, a drop pressed out of the urethra, exhibited numerous 
small zoosperms; at another time, after a three days^ interval, there 
was not a single zoosperm. 

8. In a man, thirty-eight years of age, of truly herculean propor- 
tions, who was hanged, we found many zoosperms of a small size in 
the seminal vesicles. 



§ 16. THE EXAMINATION OP THE LINEN. 293 

9. In a man, aged thvrty, who was drowned, with a chancre on 
his penis, there were a considerable number of small zoosperms. 

Only a few spermatozoa were found in the following cases : — 

10. A dxty years^ old drunkard fell down drunk upon the street 
and died. The lungs were strongly adherent. The left ventricle 
was hjrpertropied, its cavity was only about one-third of its usual 
size. There was a fibrous tumour in the spleen. The man was thus 
both aged and diseased. His seminal vesicles contained a dirty- 
greenish thick fluid (such as is often seen in dead bodies), which 
(with a power of two hundred and eighty diameters) exhibited 
spermatozoa * very distinctly, but few and smatL 

11. A man, 2i,^^^ fifty-eighty who had hanged himself; his hair 
was quite grey, but he was robust and healthy ; his penis was un- 
usually large, and as it were in a state of semi-erection. A drop of 
fluid Hke semen was pressed out of the urethra, and we found in it one 
zoosperm ; in the seminal vesicles there were a fewy but very large 
zoosperms. 

12. and 13. In the other two journeymen butchers, aged from twenty- 
to five-and'twenty years {vide above 1. and 2), in B. the seminal vesicles 
were almost empty, and exhibited a very few zoosperms, and there 
were s\!iA fewer in the case of C. 

14. The bakers apprentice, X., aged twenty years, who had 
hanged himself, exhibited a powerful development of body, a large 
member, hair on the pubis, but not a trace of beard. Very few 
zoosperms were found in the seminal vesicles. 

15. The apprentice, K., according to his father's statement, was 
in his sixteenth year; three days previously he had died of pysemic 
pneumonia after a long illness. He was five feet three inches in 
height, robust, the penis well developed, the pubic hair tolerably 
plentiful, but not a trace of beard. After repeated examination of 
the contents of his vesicles, only one large zoosperm could be found. 

16. A journeyman tradesman, aged twenty-nine years, had drowned 
himself. We could not dissect the body, but in a drop of milky 
fluid, pressed out of the urethra, we found two spermatozoa. 

17. A workman, aged nineteen, suddenly killed by the fall of a 
building, a strong powerful man, had a very few largely developed 
zoosperms in his seminal vesicles. 

♦ The miorometric definitions, which are wanting in these cases, are of no 
importance in regard to what is here sought to he determined. 



-294 § 16. THE EXAMINATION OF THE LINEN. 

18. A man, who was hanged at the age of two-and-thyrty years. 
In a drop of milky fluid from the urethra^ there were no zooiqperms, 
and only a very few in the one seminal vesicle examined. 

19. Precisely the same observation was made in the case of an 
subaltern-official of the post-office, aged thirtythree years, who had 
hanged himself. 

20. In the very strongly-built leather-dresser, A., fifty-eight years 
old, who had hanged himself, one zoosperm was found in the urethra, 
and remarkably few in the seminal vesicles. 

21. A watchman, aged thirty -eight, who had killed himself by 
cutting his throat. Few and smsJl zoosperms in the seminal 
vesicles. 

22. Remarkably few zoosperms were found in a thin but healthy 
man, 2kiOMk,forty-eigkb years of age, who had killed himself by a shot 
through the head. 

Finally, no spermatozoa were found in the following cases : — 

23. At the dissection of a master cabinet-maker, just fi^tyfour 
years of age, who had received a stab in the elbow-joint, for which 
resection of the olecranon had to be performed, and which had kept 
him six weeks in the Hospital, when he died of pyaemia, we found no 
zoosperms in the seminal vesicles. He had an unusually largely 
developed penis. 

24. A very healthy and powerful man, of thirty-four years of age, 
had been drowned three days previously. The body had only lain 
eighteen hours (in March) in the water, and was very fresh. The 
semen in the vesicles had quite the usual appearances but con- 
tained no zoosperms, and n^me were found in the testicles and 
epididymis, which were quite normal. 

25. A shoemaker, who was sixty-three years of age, but who 
looked much older, with perfectly white hair, collapsed countenance, 
and with only two or three teeth in his mouth, had been driven over 
by a carriage upon the road to Charlottenburg, and killed on the spot 
(by rupture of the liver) four days before the medico-legal dissection. 
The semen in the vesicles was somewhat greenish-yellow in colour 
and of treacly consistence, and contained no zoosperms. His aged- 
looking wife was present at the dissection, and told me in answer to 
a question, that her husband had had no intercourse with her for 
many years. 

26. A workman, aged thirty-five, who had hanged himself. This 
robustly-buUt man was five feet four inches in height, and very fat ; 



§ 16. THE EXAMINATION OF THE LINEN. 295 

a gelatinous exudation^ in the arachnoid^ proved him to have been a 
drinker. A drop of fluids in the urethra^ contained no zoosperms^ 
but even in the seminal vesicles there was not a aingle one. 

27. Ho a gardener^ aged thirty-three^ also a most robust man 
with very strong whiskers and beard^ a largly developed penis^ and a 
strong growth of hair upon the pubis, was overwhelmed while sleep- 
ing in a clay-pit. At four different examinations, no zoosperms 
were found in his seminal vesicles. 

28. An apprentice, aged nineteen, had been treated during five 
weeks for tuberculosis of the lungs in the Hospital where he died. 
No spermatozoa in the vesicles. 

29. B., an apprentice, ag^d/ourteen years and a-half^ died of in- 
flammation of the lungs in the Chants Hospital after only one day's 
treatment. There was no trace of a beard on this blonde and strongly- 
built body. A few isolated hairs were shooting out on the pubis. 
The watery secretion in the vesicles contained no zoosperms. 

30. A journeyman cabinet-maker, aged thi/rtyy who had been 
drowned, of compact habit of body, had very fresh semen in the 
vesicles, but no trace of spermatozoa was found in it. 

31. In February, the hand-organ player, N., aged forty-four, was 
found suffocated in carbonic oxide gas. A few drops of milky fluid 
in the urethra exhibited not a trace of any zoosperms, and none 
could be found on repeated examination of the contents of both 
seminal vesicles, which, to the eye, seemed true semen, nor 
in the vas deferens or the testicles themselves. Another instance, 

•therefore, of total absence of the spermatozoa. The hair of this 
man's head was indeed somewhat thin, but he had a very strong 
moustache and beard, a largely developed penis, and lai^ and per- 
fectly healthy testicles ; he was also generally quite sound, without a 
single diseased organ, and of robust build. 

82. In the body of a musician, 2i^QAfoTty4hree, found suffocated 
in carbonic oxide gas, along with his wife, no spermatozoa were found 
either in the urethra or in the seminal vesicles. 

88. N., who was hanged at the age of thi/rty-five, a very powerful 
man, who had been dead for thirty-eight hours. In a drop, out of 
the urethra, there were no zoosperms, and in the vesicles also none. 

These observations prove, not only that the human seminal fluid 
does not always contain spermatozoa, but also, that even in the 
same individud they are not always to be found. Whether, as it 
seems, long illness or excess in venere has an influence upon the 



296 § 17. CONTROVERSIES AS TO RAPE. 

origin and reproduction of these animalcnlse^ must remain for future 
and more extended observations to decide. Our own few negative 
observations are sufficient for forensic practice, because they prove, 

THAT THOUGH STAINS AKJB PROVED TO BE OP SEMINAL ORIGIN WHEN 
THESE SPECIFIC ZOOSPBRMS ARE POUND IN THEM, YET THAT THE 
ABSENCE OP SPERMATOZOA DOES NOT PROVE THAT THESE STAINS HAVE 

NOT BEEN CAUSED BY HUMAN SEMEN. The foreusic physicau will 
therefore have henceforth so to construct his report as to state his 
opinion as certain in the former case, and only more or less probable 
according to the circumstances of the individual case in the latter 
instance. 

§ 17. Continuation. — Controversies. 

From olden times, the question of rape has given rise to cer- 
tain controversies, which we may now regard as decided. 1. It has 
been doubted, whether a healthy, adult female, in the fuU possession 
of her senses, can be so overpowered by one man 2^ to be forced to 
^permit intercourse against her will ? The frequency of false accusa- 
tion from the meanest motives, such as to obtain revenge or extort 
money, fee, has given to this question an apparent practical interest, 
wholly independent of its relation to the question of the possibility of 
pregnancy being thus produced. A woman in these circumstances 
certainly possesses a means of preventing, by the movements of her 
pelvis, the perfect completion of the act of coitus, and the impossi- 
bility of this occurring is at once to be assumed, when the woman is- 
a healthy, vigorous adult, in the fall possession of her senses, and the 
man old, diseased, or feeble. But the case is entirely reversed when 
the woman, though healthy, adult, and in the fall possession of her 
senses, is yet feeble, and the man on the other hand, possessed of 
great muscular strength, and in the flower of his age. Prom this it 
is evident that this question, like almost every other medico-legal 
one, is not to be decided absolutely but relatively, and each indi- 
vidual case with all its circumstances is to be carefully considered. 
Where the strength of both parties is nearly equal, the utmost 
caution is certainly requisite, surprise, terror, momentary stupefac- 
tion, produced by being thrown down on the one hand, and unusual 
strength and sexual frenzy on the other, the male side, make the 
statements of the party violated perfectly credible. Case LIV. gives 
a rare and very instructive instance of this. Moreover, the Prussian 



§ 17. CONTROVERSIES AS TO RAPE. 297 

(p. 276 Vol, in.), the French, and so far as I know, all the more 
recent statute-bck)ks, no longer take any notice of this ancient contro- 
versy, which has, therefore, lost all its former importance. The 
matter is so constituted, that in each individual case the medical jurist 
has to determine the objective facts, and the Judge the subjective 
ones ; the former has then to explain, in accordance with the criteria 
laid down, that N. N. has had a brutality of this nature committed 
upon her ; the latter will then proceed to ascertain, whether N., the 
party accused, has committed this crime, and when circumstances of 
a physical nature exist which cause the Judge to doubt, whether the 
man in question could have been able to overpower the woman in 
question, and this query is then laid before the experts ; the latter 
will have no difficulty in giving his opinion in accordance with the 
views we have just stated. Any generally applicable dogma in 
regard to the violation of an adult, conscious, and only moderately 
powerful woman, by a single man, is therefore not tenable. 

2. Can a woman be violated during sleep ? by which of course 
natural sleep is understood, and not that artificially produced by 
spirituous liquors, narcotics, fee, or even morbid somnolence, which 
is quite a different condition. Metzger* has revived this question, 
which had been discussed centuries ago, without giving it any 
answer; recent authors mention it quite by the way, whilst the 
opinions of the faculties of Leipzig and Halle, as given by Zittmann 
and Tropanegger, are continually quoted. One case related by 
Zittmann t was that of a girl, aged twenty, who was brought to bed, 
but who ''most strenuously assured her parents, who had strictly 
called her to account, that she knew nothing at all of any sexual 
intercourse ; once, however, she had a sensuous dream, and when she 
awoke, she found some dampness about her body, but knew not to 
this hour whence ? '^ &c. The faculty of Leipzig did not hesitate, in 
accordance with these facts (!), to assume the possibility of coitus 
during sleep, and opined that ''it might well be'' that the sleeping 
damsel should thus conceive. The other case related by Zittmann is 
much more interesting when traced to its source. Li this case the 
girl, alleged to have been sitting sleeping upon an arm-chair, was 

• System, &o. 5 Aufl. Konigsberg, 1820, s. 537. 

f Medic, forensisy h. e, responsa fac. med, Zipstcus, &o. Franoof. 1796, 
p. 1156, Cas. 21. an vtrgo alto somno sepuUa deflorari et impregnari possitf 
p. 1642, Cas. 77. dormiens in sella virgo an inscia deflorari possit f An citra 
immisfnonem seminis per solam htym spiritu ascentiam concipere queat f 



298 § 17. CONTROVERSIES AS TO RAPE. 

violated by a barber's apprentice, and the faculty decided that under 
these drcumstanoes '' this was not to be regarded as quite impos- 
sible^^' and '' this/' adds this young and certainly most tnistwoitiij 
lady, " was all the more easily accomplished, that the violator luid 
already several weeks previously once actually and perfectly camallj 
known and violated her in bed'' (1 !)• And cases suci as these are yet 
accepted as bond fide scientific material ! It certainly affords a no?d 
and instructive proof of the mode in which forensic medicine is 
cultivated, when I state, that these cases of Zittmann (Leipzig) wen 
'' quoted" by the faculty of Halle in a subsequent case,* in which a 
virgin, stupified by stramonium seeds, was said to have been violated 
(''while sitting on a small stool without any back " !), another stoij; 
which rests only on the statement of the girl alone, and in r^ard to 
which they at once asserted the dogma, ''that a virgin sitting on a 
small stool can be so easily deflowered in natural deep sleep, when 
the position of the body is convenient," &c. 1 I shall bj-and-bj 
(§ 85) have to relate a case of this character from my own experi- 
ence. It is not, however, worth the trouble to prove that facts, such 
as those just related, are wholly void of support, and such nonsensical 
absurdities, alleged by dissolute maidens to prove themselves to be 
innocent victims, cannot be better answered than by the words of 
old Valentin, non omnes dormiunt, qui clausos et connwentes habetd 
oculos ! 

3. Can a woman become impregnated by an act of rape, conse- 
quently in a state of the utmost aversion, or even when during this 
act she is quite uncanscioue ? Both experience and physiology are 
at one in giving to this question an unconditional affirmation. In 
olden times the opposite view was firmly maintained, from the hypo- 
thesis that pleasurable feeling was a condition necessary for impr^- 
nation, while this could not occur under the circumstances of the 
intercourse referred to. Haller, howevOT, Boose and others, had 
already appealed to the experience of medical men in regard to 
children bom during marriage, without the mother having had any 
voluptuous sensations during intercourse. And we may inquire 
which of oxur older and more experienced physicians has not had 
occasion to make similar trustworthy observations to those which 
we also have often had occasion to make? These cases, which 
often enough occur, are peculiarly useful as proof, in which one 
and the same woman in the subsequent years of her married life 
* Tropanneger Decisionesy ^c, Dresden, 1733, p. 298. 



§ 17. CONTROVERSIES AS TO RAPE. 299 

has gradually acquired the perception of these voluptuous sensa- 
tions, and has communicated this to her husband or medical con- 
fidant, in which, therefore, there can be no deception. Moreover, 
physiologically considered, there is no reason why fertilization of 
the ovum should require to be felt any more than its escape from 
the Graafian follicle, which is never perceived. Very properly, 
tlierefore, the legislator has not hesitated as to the possibility of im- 
pregnation following rape, or during unconsciousness (p. 276, Vol. 
III.), and have fixed the damages for such cases. With us, there- 
fore, and under the statute-books similar to ours, this question no 
longer possesses the sUghfcest practical value. 

4. How far do venereal symptoms in those on whom rape is alleged 
to have been committed, confirm the fact ? This is a most important 
and practical question which has often occupied our attention in real 
life. Nothing appears plainer, and on the part of those possessed 
of but little practical experience, nothing has more easily happened 
than that existing blennorrhcea or ulcerations on the genitals of 
females, either very youthful or mere children, should at once be 
regarded as appearances completely confirmatory of the diagnosis of 
rape. But we must be careful not to draw hasty conclusions. For, 
as I have akeady remarked (p. 285, Vol. III.), it is not every blen- 
norrhoeal discharge, the result of brutality in little children, that must 
be regarded as a gonorrhoea ; and, on the other hand, it may be 
remarked by way of caution, that when the violator has no gonor- 
rhceal discharge at the time of examination, it does not follow, for a 
twofold reason, that he has not therefore abused the child. For, on 
the one hand, I repeat that in almost every case the mere friction pro- 
duces a blennorrhcea in children ; and, on the other hand, we must 
consider that the accused at the time of the commission of the deed 
may have certainly had a gonorrhoea in its last stage, which may yet 
have wholly disappeared when, many weeks subsequently, his body 
was examined ; cases such as this have frequently occurred to me. 
Now, however, — and this is a circumstance to which I wish to direct 
special attention, not only, as every beginner knows, are females of 
every age, from childhood upwards, subject to genital blennorrhcea 
arising from various causes— scrofula, catarrh, worms, &c. — which 
have nothing in common with a rape that may possibly have been 
committed ; but also, and this must be specially remembered, there is 
a peculiar form of apthous ulcer, of perfectly spontaneous origin, 
wldch readily becomes gangrenous, and affects the mucous mem- 



300 § 17. CONTROVERSIES AS TO RAPE. 

brane of the labia majora and minora^ from its circnlar form^ the 
hardness of its edges^ its lardaceous base^ &c., it has the greatest 
possible resemblance to a primary chancre, and. might very readily be 
mistaken for an ulcer of venereal origin. In one instance, in a family 
in the higher ranks of citizenship, in which a case of this nature pre- 
sented an extremely deceptive appearance, great misfortune to all the 
parties concerned was prevented by my quite decided opinion, which 
was subsequently confirmed in every particular. In another case, 
which occurred among the dregs of the suburbs of Berlin, there was 
a similar pseudo-chancre on the external labium of a (just as in the 
foregoing case) four-years' old girl, and here, the father had accused 
the paramour of his wife, and he in turn had accused the father of 
having abused and infected the child ! Both men were, however, 
perfectly healthy, and mere cleanliness healed the sore in ten or 
fourteen days. Others have also observed similar cases, and these 
ulcers have occurred in an extent almost epidemic. Percival * re- 
lates the shocking case of Jane Hampson, four years old, who was 
admitted in 1791 into the Manchester Hospital, with very much 
inflamed '' ulcerated '' and painful genitals, with pain on micturition. 
The child had, as was ascertained, slept two or three nights in the 
same bed with a boy, aged fourteen. She died in nine days ; the 
surgeon Ward gave it as his opinion, that the death of the child 
had been caused by ''external violence,'^ and the result was a 
verdict by the jury of ''guilty of murder !'' After a few weeks, 
"many similar cases'' occurred, and some of these children died. 
The verdict fortunately could still be recalled. Capuron,t in 1802, 
saw a precisely similar case in a girl, aged four years, who had an 
acrid mucous discharge from the vagina. The labia majora were red, 
painful, swollen, and even deep ulcerations were visible. The parents 
asserted it to be a case of rape. It was, however^ " nothing else but 
a catarrhal affection, which at that time raged in Paris." Capuron 
also saw another precisely similar case in 1809. These are warning 
examples. We must, therefore, proceed with the greatest prudence, 
and with accurate attention to the totality of the case, the presence 
or absence of the other signs of rape, and particularly the stage of 
the seeming venereal affection, compared with the time of its alleged 
origin from the pretended rape, and regulate our opinion accordingly. 
The fourth part of those examined by me, however, I found to be 
actually infected with syphilis, chiefly with true gonorrhoea, three 
♦ Beck, op. citf p. 55. f Devergie, op. cit p. 359. 



§ 17. CONTROVERSIES AS TO RAPE. 301 

times with true primary chancre, and once with conical condylomata. 
It is well known that among the lower classes there prevails an 
absurd and horrible opinion that a venereal complaint is most cer- 
tainly and quickly cured by coitus with a pure virgin, and most 
indubitably with a child, and this explains the very numerous cases 
observed by us. If we find now the signs of a recent defloration, 
already given ; if we find the statements of the party or her relatives 
to be trustworthy in regard to pain in passing urine and faeces previous 
to the commencement of the blennorrhoea ; and if we consider, as 
already pointed out, the stage of the complaint along with what is 
stated as to its course, then we shall be in a position with « clear con- 
science rightly to decide upon the case. But there is yet another 
view of the case in regard to which experience alone makes wise, and 
only by long intercourse with the dregs of the people do we learn 
at length how far human corruption can go 1 The youthful subject 
may actually have primary syphilitic symptoms, and it is alleged 
that she has been infected by the party accused of her violation. No 
sufScient time has elapsed for the obliteration of all the symptoms, 
yet the accused is perfectly healthy. In a case such as this, remem- 
bering perhaps my former warning, we must not rashly conclude 
that there has been no infection. Certainly there was infection in 
the case of a cobbler's daughter, aged eleven years, whose mother 
had accused a perfectly irreproachable man of having violated and 
infected her child when she was making purchases in his shop. The 
labia majora of the child was gaping, the clitoris was unusually de- 
veloped, the introitus vaginae was inflammatorily reddened, and there 
was no deception in its being very painful to the touch; the hymen 
still existed, but much dilated, and a true gonorrhoea was actually 
present. Our report stated, that there had not been complete 
immission, but an attempt thereat had been made by a male organ 
infected with gonorrhoea. Further investigation proved the correct- 
ness of our opinion, but not of the accusation. Because it was 
ascertained that the mother, after having attempted in vain to extort 
money from the merchant, had given her child to her own paramour 
whom she knew to be infected with gonorrhoea, and with which he 
had, as I subsequently discovered, infected herself, with the intention 
of terrifying the merchant at the result which was to be expected, 
and thus committing — a pecuniary rape upon him ! ! In a similar 
case (by Fod^r6*), of violent gonorrhoea in a girl, aged twelve, the 
* La M6deciiie, &c. iv. p. 365. 



302 § 17. CONTROVERSIES AS TO RAPE. 

perfectly innocent prisoner (!) accused was set free, when it was 
ascertained that the child had been permitted to sleep with a public 
prostitute.— Finally, every physician knows, that venereal symptoms 
maybe found without there having been necessarily any previous sexual 
contamination, because they may arise from contact with the vene- 
real virus in any other way, as by sleeping in the same bed with a 
person infected, or by the common use of chamber-pots, towels, &c. 
Taylor relates a case of unfounded accusation of ra^, in which it was 
ascertained that both of the children infected with syphilis had made 
use of a sponge also used by an infected young man. But every 
physician ako knows from his daily practice, how sceptical we 
behove to be as to any statement regarding the non-sexual origin of 
gonorrhoea, chancre, &c. 

6. Is rape also to be reckoned an '' injury'' in the sense of the 
statute-book ? This question is nowhere taken notice of, and yet, as 
already related, it constantly occurs to me in forensic practice. Of 
course, I do not refer to the juridical sense of the query, in so far as 
this has an influence on the punishment of the guilty person, with 
this the forensic physician has nothing to do; but I refer to the 
question, whether the consequences which may result from the com- 
mission of rape can be reckoned, in a medical point of view, among 
those which the statute-book supposes may result from its "im- 
portant,'' or ''severe" injuries, and threatens with punishment 
(§§ 192 a, 193, vide §§ 44 and 49 farther on). In this respect we 
have only to consider " important damage to the health or limbs of 
the party injured," or '' a long period of inability to work," or 
" mutilation," or '' deprivation of the power of procreation," or per- 
haps even "the production of mental disease." All the other 
results mentioned in § 193 of the statute-book are by their nature 
excluded. Except in those possible, but quite unusual cases, such 
as in all my experience I have only twice had occasion to observe, 
where, besides the rape, other violence, ill-usage, &c., has been 
inflicted, I have never been in a position to be able to declare rape to 
be a " severe" injury, even when coitus has been fully consummated, 
and the hymen completely destroyed. For it does not require to be ex- 
plained that the injured party is not thereby" deprived of the power of 
procreation ;" and I shall by-and-by show, in its proper place (§44), 
that the destruction of the hymen cannot be reckoned a " mutilation." 
Just as little can it be termed an "important injury," without 
doing violence to the latter idea. " A long period of inability to 



§ 18. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 303 

work '' (§ 50), is also not the usual result of this brutality. It is dif- 
ferent,however, when venereal disease is contracted simultaneously. In 
eases of this nature when the judicial query is put, we must unde- 
niably declare that this individual " unchaste action for the purpose 
of gratifying the sexual desire" is also " an important injury '' in 
the sense of the statute-book, for in such a case the injured party 
not only receives ^'an important injury to her health,'' but the 
result to her is also '' a long period of inability to work/' But to 
this subject we shall by-and-by return. 

§ 18. Illustrative Cases. 

Cases XLII. to XLVI. — Mistakes in eegabd to the Hymen 

IN Children. 

XLII. — A., a journeyman tradesman, was accused of having laid 
Augusta, a girl, aged eight years, on a bed, on the 5th of May, and 
then violating her. The child was said to have walked at first in a 
straddling manner, and she had considerable vaginal blennorrhoea. 
Dr. X., who discovered this, also certified that the hymen was 
destroyed, but that no carunculse were present. At the request of 
the public prosecutor, I was required, at the sitting of the jury court 
in October, to examine the child on the spot. I discovered — and 
the physician named convinced himself of its correctness — a complete, 
undestroyed hymen existing, of a circular form, and also (after five 
months !) the genitals otherwise perfectly normal. As, however, the 
fact of the unchaste deed was otherwise proved, the accused was 
sentenced to two years and three months' penal servitude. 

XLin. — In a divorce case, the parties to which belonged to the 
very lowest class, the wife had brought the most horrible accusations 
against her husband, particularly that he had practised the most 
unmentionable wickedness with herself, and that he had violated 
his own daughter of two years and a-half old. A surgical certificate 
had testified to the '' absence of the hymen in the child." This was 
a mistake ; the hymen was present, and not the slightest anomaly 
was found in the genitals. (In regard to the other abominations, I de- 
clared, that the examination of the husband '^had not revealed 
anything that could in any wise be regarded as supporting the 
accusations of the plaintifl^.") 

XLIV. — ^The case of the girl Mary, aged ten, gave occasion to 
the following cross-questions. I had described this child, alleged to 



304 § 18. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

have been violated, as '' perfectly normal and a virgin '^ on the 17th of 
October. Upon this, the documentary evidence contaming two 
previous medical certificates was laid before me, with the request 
that I should explain the contradiction in the medical opinions. '^ I 
have considered it necessary,'^ said I, '' again to examine the child 
most carefully to-day (the 5th of November), and I have found my 
opinion, as delivered on the 17 th of last month, completely confirmed. 
Though Dr. A. has certified on the 1st of October, that the 
hymen is posteriorly partiaUy lacerated, and the opening in it 
thereby much dilated, but that the posterior laceration is now cica- 
trized, yet 1 must declare, that the hymen in this child is to-day 
distinctly present and perfectly entire, only it is of an unusual 
form which might readily lead to a mistake, as it is almost triangular. 
The deceptiveness of this form is increased by the fact, that the mem- 
brane is of a somewhat fleshy consistence, but this, even in children, 
is no unusual occurrence. I have not succeeded in discovering any 
cicatrix in the hymen, and in regard to former subjective statements 
of the child, as to a difficulty in passing water and faeces, which is 
now said to be quite gone, I can say nothing about them. — Dr. O., 
at his examination in the end of September, found that the labia 
raajora did not meet so closely as they usually do in children, and as 
' must have been peculiarly the case in this child.' I do not under- 
stand why the latter statement is made, but 1 confess that the labia 
externa are certainly somewhat loose and flabby, but in regard to this 
we must take into consideration the general flabby (scrophulous) con- 
stitution of the child, who has lost an eye, most probably, from 
scrophulous inflammation. The physician mentioned, also found an 
ecchymosis, the size of a lentil, on the labium, which may very 
possibly have been the case in the end of September, but which I 
was not able to discover on the 17 th of October, any more than to- 
day. Dr. O. also found, on the left side posteriorly of the hymen, a 
small notch, which he regarded as the cicatrix of a trifling laceration. 
I have abeady expressed my opinion as to the nature of this cicatrix, 
and I may only remark that a very small cicatrix, such as that in 
question must have been, might very possibly have entirely disap- 
peared within the period which elapsed between my first examination 
and the one undertaken to-day. The apparent contradictions are 
explicable, therefore, partly by a mistake, and partly also by the 
difference in the time at which the child was examined by the two 
physicians mentioned, and by myself respectively. And in the latter 



§ 18. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 305 

respect it is well known how speedily the signs of a rape actually 
accomplished are found to disappear. 

XLV. and XLVI. — ^Both of the after-to-be-mentioned children 
were said to have been repeatedly violated by M., and for the last 
time only eight days before my examination. The cases were as 
follow : — a. Emily, almost thirteen years old, vigorous for her age, 
and in good general health, The genitals are hairless, like those of 
a child. The entrance to the vagina is unusually dilated in propor- 
tion to its development ; the mucous membrane of both the labia 
minora is excoriated; slightly reddened, and very painful to the 
touch. The hymen is present, but lacerated one line deep on its 
left side, and on its upper border distinctly swollen, as is also the 
neighbourhood of the urethra, which is of a bright red. A moderate 
quantity of greenish mucus flows out of the vagina. These appear- 
ances, therefore, in the main coincide with those observed by Ihr. D. 
on the day after the commission of the deed, and described in his 
certificate, dated the 21st of this month, except that he has errone- 
ously stated that the hymen is no longer present, h. Anna, also ten 
years old, is also healthy and vigorous for her age. In this child also 
the entrance to the vagina is unusually dilated, the internal mucous 
membrane slightly reddened, and the parts very painful to the touch. 
The hymen, which is still present, and the neighbourhood of the 
urethra, were particularly reddened. The vagina of this child also 
secretes a greenish mucus which stains the linen. I have not ob- 
served a laceration in the inferior commissure of the labia, mentioned 
in the medical certificate referred to, and there is also a mistake in 
the assertion contained in it that the hymen no longer exists. As no 
disease is present capable of producing the appearances described, or 
appearances similar to them, and from the evident traces of violence 
to the genitals, I have no hesitation in stating it as my opinion, that 
" from the appearances on and in the genitals of the girls Emily and 
Anna, we may conclude, that a sexual crime has been committed 
upon the children.'^ 

Case XLVII. — ^Vieginity and Pregnancy. 

A girl, aged twenty, had hanged herself, and some scratches upon 

her neck occasioned her being medico-legally dissected. I only 

mention the appearances foimd belonging to this part of the subject. 

The hymen was entire. It was precisely of the size and shape of an 

VOL. ni. X 



306 $ 18. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

ordinaiy almond in its shelly and circnlar^ not semicircular. Its infe- 
rior edge, but only this, was lacerated and exhibited small caruncoliB. 
All the rest of it was perfectly well-preserved, of which all my pupils 
present convinced themselves; the opening was large enough to per- 
mit at least of partial immission. The entrance to the vagina was 
somewhat more dilated than is usually the case in the virgin state, 
tiie Jranulum uninjured. The uterus, which reached to the navel, 
contained a female foetus, fifteen inches long, with closed eyelids, 
wide gaping labia, scarcely any trace of fii^er-nails, but tolerably firm 
cartilages both of the nose and ears. 

Case XL V 111. — ^Allbged gaossly Indecent Assault. 

A practitioner of medicine. Dr. Z., was accused of having com- 
mitted a grossly indecent assault upon a girl, Mary, aged eleven, 
by '' feeling under her frock.^' The following was the result of my 
examination as reported. '^ The child is mentally far beyond her 
age. She describes the alleged misconduct not with the timorous 
shamefacedness or shy embarrassment of a child of eleven, but with 
the bold impudence and vulgar assurance of a much older girl of the 
lowest dass. At present she is perfectly sound both in general 
health, and also as regards her genitals and anus, except that she 
asserts that she suffers from convulsive attacks daily, and the at- 
tendants in the Hospital — ^where the child is — state, in confirmation, 
that she has had already eight attacks of convulsions to-day, in which 
her arms were writhed about, &c. If these attacks were not simulated, 
which, from the absence of personal observation, I cannot positively 
assert, it would certainly be a most remarkable occurrence that such 
convulsive attacks should be the result of alarm raised in so young a 
child by an outrage upon her modesty, though the bare possibility of 
such a connection cannot be denied. It is also remarkable that the 
child declared to me that she had suffered from these attacks for two 
months, and correctly enough describes the 2nd of September as the 
day upon which she was attacked, whilst she does not know what is 
the name of the present month, nor how many weeks there are in a 
month. Further, when Dr. E. certifies '^ that two days after the 
alleged attack he observed that the neighbourhood of the anus, as 
well as the labia majora, were considerably reddened ; that a thick 
yellowish discharge flowed from the vagina, and that a few inches 
from the anus a small patch of her cuticle was excoriated/' I do not 



§ 18. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 307 

hesitate to declare— presupposing the correctness of these observations 
—-that ''only the latter appearance, the slight excoriation, can have 
arisen from the gripe under the frock, that is to say, from scratching 
with a finger-nail, while it is impossible to understand how inflam- 
matory redness of the region of the anus, or mucous discharge from 
the vagina, could have been thus caused. From the suspicious-look- 
ing nature of the case, I must reserve a more thorough statement of 
my opinion till I obtain further information at the oral trial/' How- 
ever, after this explanation, the public prosecutor did not pursue the 
case further. Evidently there was some mystification here ! 

Case XLIX. — ^Bape of an Adult. 

This revolting case occurred in November, 185*, and concerned — 
an idiot girl, aged twenty-four. She was violated by two men, by 
the one while lying, and immediately afterwards by the other while 
standing, the first man holding her I The examination, which was 
not carried out till after the lapse of some weeks, was productive of 
no result, because the girl had already (two years previously) given 
birth to a child, which was — ^begotten by a physician, who had first 
of all examined her with a speculum ! ! 

Case L. — Bape op an Adult in an Involuntary and Uncon- 
scious Condition. 

Amelia, twenty-two years old, had for years laboured under hys- 
terico-epileptic convulsions, which always commenced witi vomiting, 
and were followed by a state of unconsciousness, which lasted from 
one to six or seven hours. When in this condition, if a leg or an 
arm is raised, it falls at once mechanically. It has also happened 
that by calling out her name she was convulsed by terror. On the 
evening of the 2nd of August she began to vomit^ and as she felt 
the precursory symptoms of these convulsive attacks, she went and 
lay down upon a sofa, in a neighbouring apartment. Here she was 
found by the labourer, A., on his return to the house; he was aware 
of her liability to these attacks, and after he had twice tickled her nose 
with a straw, and as this produced no signs of reaction, passed a 
burning lamp beneath her nose (the slight scab produced by this 1 
subsequently saw), he, convinced of her perfect unconsciousness, 
drew her from the sofa on to a stool, and there, in sight of a com- 

x2 



308 § 18. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

panion, who looked on from the adjoining apartment, he consummated 
the act of coitus ! Speedily awaking, the damsel felt pain and dampness 
about her genitab, and saw A. standing before her with his breeches 
unbuttoned, so that she had no doubt that she had been violated. A., 
when examined, did not deny having had connexion with the damsel, 
but denied her unconsciousness, and asserted that she was quite com- 
pliant. For this reason I did not require to examine her genitals, 
but only to express my opinion as to her morbid condition in respect 
of § 144, ad 2. of the Penal Code, which bears upon such conditions. 
At the time of trial it was ascertained with certainty that Amelia 
had already frequently cohabited with men; but it was also not only 
proved by several witnesses that she was liable to convulsive attacks 
which were not simulated, but likewise by the testimony of the eye- 
witness before-mentioned, that she was in a state of unconsciousness 
at the time of the coitus in question. Accordingly A. was con- 
demned by the jury court to three years^ penal servitude. 

Case LI. — Rape of an Adult. 

One Sunday in 1843, four men forced their way into a house in 
which they knew that there was only one maid-servant alone. On 
ringing the bell she opened the door; they pushed her aside at once, 
struck her violently on the head, and then threw her down on the 
stone floor, whilst two of the robbers broke open the presses ; the 
others tied her hands, threw her clothes over her head, and one of 
them satisfied his lust upon her ; the other evacuated his faeces upon 
the face of the woman supposed to be lying senseless, and the second 
stuflfed a piece of paper and a venesection bandage, she having been 
bled that very evening, both soiled with feeces, into her mouth ! ! 
She says she felt the immmio penis of the robber, but no seminal 
ejaculation. A physician, who saw her immediately after the com- 
mission of this unheard-of deed, certified that he found her breast 
and chin still soiled with human faeces. This malicious action ex- 
cited so much commiseration, that a public collection was made in 
the town for the girl. Four days subsequently I had to examine 
the ill-used woman. Besides a general great depression of the whole 
nervous system and alleged convulsive attacks, which, however, I 
did not observe, I found the left cheek slightly swollen, and in the 
middle of it a recent pin-scratch two-thirds of an inch in length. 
She said that the robbers had torn her hair, and her mistress exhi- 



§ 18. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 309 

bited a considerable bunch of hair, which exactly resembled the hair on 
the head of the patient, and which had come out on merely combing 
the hair the following morning; there were also patches of the scalp 
bare of hair upon the right side of the head. Further, she said, that the 
robbers had torn the hair off her genitals, and a careful examination 
of the hair on both the labia majora certainly showed that there was 
a barer patch upon the right one. On the inner side of the right 
(high, close to the entrance into the vagina, there was a somewhat 
darker patch, alleged to be painful to the touch, precisely as if strong 
pressure had been made here to separate the thighs from one another. 
The vagina itself was uninjured, the frsenulum present, but the hy- 
men wanting. "I have no hesitation, therefore, in spite of the 
asseveration of Z., that she had never before had carnal intercourse, 
in asserting positively that this destruction of the hymen has not 
been caused by a defloration which happened only ninety-six hours 
ago, because all traces of any recent and violent defloration, such as 
bruises, inflammation, haemorrhage, discharge, &c., are in this case 
completely absent, and the carunculse of the hymen are firm and 
insensitive. To this I must add, that Z. confesses never to have felt 
pain in walking, or in passing urine or faeces, which also is against 
the idea of a violent defloration having happened just a few days ago.^^ 
No trace of haemorrhage from laceration of the hymen was to be 
found on her shift, and in a suspicious stain upon its hinder part 
there were found indeed mucus cells, but no spermatozoa. Accord- 
ingly I declared positively that there was no appearances to be found 
on Z. that could be referred to a recent (four days ago) defloration, 
or a recent violently consummated coitus, but rather that Z. had 
been already deflowered a long time previously. In the course of a 
very tedious investigation the perfect correctness of this opinion was 
ascertained, as it was proved by witnesses brought from her native 
place that Z. had once aborted there three years previously, so that 
she was ultimately punished for having declared, upon oath, in oppo- 
sition to my opinion, that she had never previously had carnal con- 
nexion with any man. The perpetrator of this unheard of crime was 
punished with twenty years' penal servitude. 

Case LII. — Rape of an Adult. 

A young peasant was accused of having taken a girl, N. N., aged 
seventeen, under his arm out of a company in an alehouse, in a half* 



310 § 18. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

tipsy condition ; that he laid her down in the barn^ and then violated 
her in spite of her struggles and cries. The accused asserted before 
the jury court, to which I was called in the middle of the case to 
give a super arbUrium, that she had twice previously permitted him 
to have intercourse with her. N. N. declared that the act had 
caused her pain^ but that she had not been made wet, and that she 
had immediately thereafter been able to walk home, about an (Eng- 
lish) nule. The damsel was not yet fully-developed sexually. Her 
genitals were tight and virgin-like, the labia majora met one another, 
the hymen was still perfect, without any laceration, but fleshy, and 
almost pufiy. I declared that she was not deflowered, that the two 
previous acts of coitus had not been complete, and that from her 
struggles on the one hand, and his half-drunken condition on the 
other, her statement that she had not remarked any seminal ejacu- 
lation did not appear to be devoid of truth. The accused was con- 
demned. 

Case LITE. — ^Rapb op an Adult. 

This was another of those cases which have so frequentily come 
before us in which physicians have erred in regard to the existence 
of the hymen. I had to make my examination just ten months after 
the commission of the deed. H., aged twenty years, declared that 
on the 3rd of April she was thrown down and violated by the accused, 
after he had previously sought to seduce her by means of co£fee which 
she suspected (a love potion !), and particularly on the evening of the 
commission of the deed had rendered her insensible by burning 
gunpowder in her room. In consequence of this treatment she 
declared she had been made ill, and had been so ever since. Dr. 
X., who examined her shortly after the commission of the deed, 
found a '' laceration of the hymen, ecchymosis in the labia minora, 
and a painful and bleeding vagina.'' Counsellor Dr. Y., who ex- 
amined her in the beginning of July, found ^^ that the hymen was 
absent, that she laboured under leucorrhoea, and that she was chlo- 
rotic, weak, and ill.'' '' Weak in body," is what Dr. Z. testifies to 
in October. For my part I found her in the following February 
healthy and blooming, without a trace of chlorosis ; indeed, as I found, 
menstruating so strongly that I had to postpone my examination. 
The semicircular hymen was quite perfect, and only exhibited on its 
left side a firm cicatrix, which confirmed the certificate of the first 



§ 18. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 311 

physician. It was of importance for the whole affair that H. was 
a woman of unusually limited intelligence. In respect of my own 
examination, and of the appearances foimd immediately after the 
deed, I expressed my opinion that the still virgin genitals had some 
time previously been violently brought into contact with a hard body, 
probably a male organ in a state of erection. 

Case LIV. — Eape of an Aj)ult. 

One of the most instructive cases in the whole range of my ex- 
perience ; it referred to a healthy and powerfully adult woman, who 
was alleged to have been violated by a single man, and I hesitated a 
long time before making up my mind regarding it. On the 16th 
of January, L. persuaded P., a girl aged five-and-twenty, to accom- 
pany him to the Thiergarten in the dark, and after he had been balked 
by her struggles in his endeavours to violate her against a tree, he 
seized her round the body, and flung her on the ground, and being 
now, as she states, deprived of the power of resistance, he flung her 
dress over her head, and violated her. Nine days subsequently I 
had to examine her. Her appearance was timid and maidenish, and 
without dissimulation she was deeply moved by what had befallen 
her. The entrance to the vagina was still reddened, and painful 
when touched and dilated, the hymen was completely torn and 
bright red; carunculse, still slightly swollen, were visible; the fraenu- 
lum still existed. Without any leading question, and only in 
answer to general queries as to her bodily and mental condition, she 
declared that stiU a little, and several days ago much more, she could 
only with difficulty walk, and pass urine and faeces. After carefully 
considering all that required to be considered in such a case, I came 
to the conclusion that a rape had actually been committed upon P. 
At the time of trial circumstances came out which only served to 
confirm this opinion. The police officers, who had hurried up at 
the cries of P., testified that the ground upon which she had been 
thrown was hard frozen, and they deposed that L. when arrested, 
and after his lust had been satisfied, was stiU in a condition of actual 
satyriasis. The interest of this important case cannot be mistaken, 
for it shows that a healthy powerful woman was certainly completely 
violated by a single man. L. was condemned to four years' penal 
servitude. 



312 5 18. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 



CasbLV. — ^Allegation op Bape and Incest. 

By means of the illustrative cases of this work, I must have 
afforded glimpses into a world, of the existence of which millions of 
men know nothing, and of the nature of which they can form, 
no idea. The subject of this case was certainly one of the most 
hair-bristling specimens of this world. She was the daughter 
of a journeyman mason, just thirteen years of age, but looking much 
older. She brought forward the accusation against her father, — ^her 
own father, — of having " once, two years ago " (I) come into the bed in 
which she slept with a younger sister, and violated her. Upon in- 
quiry why a strong girl like her had not cried out and striven to 
defend herself she declared that her father had with one hand 
pressed the pillow on her mouth, and with the other held both of 
hers 1 1 She said also that she did not quite awake when her father 
came into bed beside her, but only after he had got on the top of 
her ! Further, she declared that on this occasion she was made 
moist, that she next day had some heemorrhage, which only lasted 
eight days, that she also passed blood on going to stool, that she 
had stitches in her abdomen, ^' and soreness in her loins.'' That all 
these statements were only gross lies, was all the more probable as 
the managers of the orphan-house, in which she then was, gave the 
most unfavourable testimony against her, by which it was clearly 
ascertained that she had already been guilty of theft, that she showed 
great dexterity in lying, that she was given to gadding about, and 
had even already had intercourse with men. The appearances found 
were the following :^-commencing growth of hair on the pubis, the 
frenulum was still present, the entrance to the vagina was not un- 
usually dilated, and not at all inflamed or irritated, the hymen was 
fleshy, and had on its right side a gaping, cicatrized laceration, one 
line and a-half in depth; there was no discharge. The accused 
father utterly denied any kind of criminal assault upon his daughter; 
and I shall never forget the horror excited by her confrontation 
with him, in which he alleged revenge to be the motive of her accu- 
sation, whilst she, with most disgusting particularity, cast her accu- 
sation in his face. Nevertheless, I of course fashioned my report as 
objectively as possible. It was as follows : — " That from the ap- 
pearances found we may conclude that violence has been inflicted 
upon the genital organs in question by some hard foreign body, and 



§ 18. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES 313 

that it is possible that this may have been a male organ in a state of 
erection, bnt that the statements of N. make it very improbable that 
the rape alleged to have been committed upon her took place as she 
asserts/^ Her father was consequently acquitted. 



Case LVI. — A Similar Case. 

This case was attended with a different result, and I relate it 
because in cases which rest upon no positive proof, there are always 
diflBculties in way of drawing up a satisfactory report. N., the step- 
father of a girl just eleven years of age, was accused of having for 
two years past had repeated carnal connection with her. The girl 
stated at first that she had been made moist three times, but after- 
wards she denied this, and described the whole occurrence with the 
utmost unembarrassment and truth. The frtenulum and the sigmoidal 
hymen were quite entire, the latter not even lacerated. The entrance 
to the vagina was quite unusually dilated ; at the time of my ex- 
amination, however, there was neither pain, inflammatory irritation, 
nor discharge, &c., present, so that the exploration was easily made. 
These appearances were described, and it was then said that the dila- 
tation of the entrance to the vagina proved that some hard foreign 
body had been repeatedly forced into the vagina, that this might 
possibly have been a male organ in a state of erection, and that there- 
fore the objective appearances were not in contradiction to the state- 
ment of the child. The accused was condemned by the jury court. 

Case LVII. — Bepeated Incest with an Adult. 

A father was accused of having repeatedly had incestuous con- 
nection with his daughter, aged nineteen, and that at least three 
times within the last two years. The hymen was quite entire, and 
of an unusual form, the opening through it was quite oval, and of 
the size of a large plum-stone, so that the index finger could very 
easily pass into the vagina. Nothing else anormal was observed 
about the genitals. As by such a formation of the hymen it was 
quite possible for the point of the penis to penetrate, we reported, 
"that no proof of any violation of H. could be deduced from the 
appearances found, but they were not inconsistent with the possibility 
of such an occurrence.'^ 



814 S 18. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

The following case required a very different decision^ and presented 
manifold points of interest. 

Case LVlil. — Alleged Rape op a Woman, aged Foety-seven. 

* This was a most important case of accusation of breach of official 

duty against an official of the Court, and it was required to 

determine the truth of an alleged rape, attended by gonorrhoeal in- 
fection, after five physicians, two of whom were forensic, had been 
already employed in the matter. According to the statement on 
oath of the prosecutrix, Mrs. R., E. who, we may mention by the way, 
had the most favourable testimonials of character as an official, a 
husband, and a father, when he had to carry out an execution against 
Mrs. B. ten months ago, on the 3rd of July, gave her to understand 
that he would re&ain from action, provided she yielded herself to his 
wishes. Whilst thus conversing, sitting on a ditch beside her, he 
suddenly fell upon her, flung himself on the top of her, uncovered his 
penis, and so completely consummated carnal intercourse that the pro- 
secutrix " felt a strong ejaculation of semen from him/^ " The whole 
of this description of the procedure,^' I said in my report, "is 
entirely devoid of internal credibility. Mrs. R. is forty-seven years of 
age, healthy, and apparently quite strong, married, and the mother 
of several children, and consequently, not to be regarded as wholly 
unknowing in these matters, and though she has not even once 
sought to explain away the improbability of her statement, by the 
allegations of temporary illness or unconsciousness, yet it is all the 
less probable that the proceeding described actually took place; that 
the accused, E., is a man already forty-two years of age, and not of 
colossal size or strength, but only of a middling size, and happily 
married for many years, so that the sexual ardour of early youth 
cannot be any longer supposed to exist in him. Nevertheless, the 
prosecutrix declares that by this intercourse she has been inflicted with 
gonorrhoea. For this she has applied to Drs. G., N., and I., one 
after the other, whose certificates and recipes are included in the 
documentary evidence. Of the latter I only remark, that they have 
all been actually prepared as we learn from the apothecaries^ price- 
stamp affixed to each, and that remedies are prescribed in them such 
as are usually prescribed for urethral mucous discharge (gonor- 
rhoea). Whether Mrs. R. has used all these medicaments, of course I 
cannot give any opinion. In regard to the statements of the physi- 



§ 18. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 315 

cians^ that of Dr. G. is of no value, as lie never examined Mrs. R., 
because at the consultation she made ' not the best impression ' on 
him, and he only prescribed in accordance with her owri statement 
of her complaint. There is no certificate from Dr. I. Finally, Dr. 
N., on examining the genitals of Mrs. R. on the 3rd of August, that 
is only four weeks after the alleged infection, when the last traces 
of gonorrhoea have seldom if ever quite disappeared, found ' no 
symptom of gonorrhoea,' but only a clear mucous discharge; 
which, however, only came from the vagina and not from the ure- 
thra,' and the physician last named convinced himself of this by 
making pressure along the course of the urethra. This experi- 
ment is convincing enough that on the 8rd of August Mrs. E. 
had no gonorrhoea (mucous discharge from the urethra), and I 
may consequently affirm that the supposition of Dr. G., that she 
had no gonorrhoea at all, was correct. The slight mucous discharge 
from the vagina does not require to be considered here, since an 
affection of this character is a very common occurrence in women, 
and no conclusion can be drawn from it as to the preoccurrence of 
intercourse, especially of impure intercourse.'' 

'' Having thus shown, that it cannot be asserted that Mrs. E. 
was violated and infected with gonorrhoea by the accused on the 3rd 
of July, my duty in regard to this case might seem to be discharged. 
But the certificates of district physician. Dr. L., dated the 18th of 
September and the 5th of November, and of the forensic surgeon, 
K., dated the 23rd of September, are apparently opposed to the con- 
clusions just drawn. Dr. L. was officially required to examine Mrs. 
E. on the 18th of September, that is ten weeks after the alleged 
rape, and he found 'traces of what is alleged to have formerly been a 
violent leucorrhoea,' which he calls 'trifling.' Nevertheless, the 
forensic physician named does not hesitate to assume ' with certainty, 
from the mode of commencement and the course of the gradually 
lessening disease, that it must have arisen from impure connection 
with a man affected with gonorrhoea.' Dr. L., therefore, in the first 
place, from the results of an observation, which is anything but cor- 
rect, like that of Dr. G.^ because, as already remarked, 'leucorrhoea' 
(mucous discharge from the vagina) and true urethral gonorrhoea 
are two perfectly different diseases; and in the second place, from 
mere subjective assertions of the prosecutrix, which it is evident can 
possess no scientific value whatever, deduces his conclusion 'with 
certainty ;' a conclusion in the certainty of which I am very far from 



316 § 18. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

sharing; but Dr. L. and surgeon K. also declare, that they found in 
the accused the traces of an actual gonorrhoea. L. examined him first 
on the 5th pt November, that is, just four months after the alleged 
intercourse, and on his shirt ' a few small yellowish stains were visible, 
which were the results of a discharge from the urethra, which seemed 
to be the sequela of a gonorrhoea.* Surgeon K. certified eleven 
weeks after the alleged crime, on the 23rd of September, that he 
found the aperture of the urethra of E. not inflamed, and also no 
purulent discharge from it, but that on his shirt there were about 
twelve 'yellowish-green purulent stains, some the size of a lentil, 
others of a pea, and a few of them quite recent,* and from this in 
curious connection with the ' suspicious behaviour* of the party ex- 
amined, he draws the conclusion, that E. laboured under a virulent 
gonorrhoea on the 3rd of July, and was capable of communicating 
the infection. — ^But small yellowish-green stains, and few in number, 
on the linen of both sexes, may readily deceive. I have already spoken 
of a leucorrhoeal discharge from the vagina in women. But the urethra 
is also clothed with a mucous membrane, which, like every other mu- 
cous membrane, — ^that of the nose for example — sometimes secretes, 
even in men, an unusual quantity of mucus which escapes upon the 
linen. This may be caused by catarrh of the bladder or urethra, haemor- 
rhoids, gout, the irritation of worms, &c., and physicians very fre- 
quently find considerable discharges of this nature where any suspicion 
of any infection by impure int^course is wholly out of the question. 
• To conclude, from the appearance of a few stains, such as those de- 
scribed, that there has been impure intercourse, is all the less 
justifiable where no inflammation is to be found in or about the 
urethra, which surgeon K. expressly denies. Moreover, at the precog- 
nition, on the 10th of February, he deposed what he has to-day again 
declared to me, that he suffers from occasional incontinence of urine, 
and especially when much disturbed mentally he cannot well retain his 
urine, and there is then 'a slight escape from the urethra.* I know 
not whether this was his condition at the time of the examination, it 
is, however, certain that the stains referred to must have had a 
different source from that supposed by both of these experts. 
Finally, I have still to state, that the day before yesterday I ex- 
amined Mrs. R., and to-day both of the E.*s to ascertain the condition 
of their genitals, and 1 have found them all three sexually perfectly 
healthy, and not affected with the slightest trace of gonorrhoea, and 
that the wife of the accused asserted to me, as she had formerly 



§ 18. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 317 

done when precognosced, that notwithstanding continuous inter- 
course with her husband, she had always been perfectly healthy. In 
accordance with what has just been stated, I give it as my opinion 
in regard to the queries put to me, 1. That it is not to be assumed 
that E. could have committed a rape upon Mrs. R. on the 3rd of 
July in the manner stated : 2. That there is no proof that Mrs. R. 
suffered from gonorrhoea subsequent to the 8rd of July, and that, 
according to the documentary evidence, the contrary is more probable : 
3. That E., and 4. also his wife, are not at present affected with the 
said disease, and no traces of its former existence are to be found : 
5. That the conclusions drawn by the physicians L. and K. from the 
stains upon the shirt are not correct, and that these stains may have 
arisen from a different cause. 

Case LIX. — ^Alleged Rape. 

The subject of this case was a girl, aged fourteen, who declared 
she had been attacked and violated by the accused, on the 18th of 
September, and she declared that she had then felt violent pain, and 
immediately afterwards observed blood on her shift. She states, that 
she was prevented from crying by the " violent kissing " of the ac- 
cused (!). Three days subsequently she was examined by Dr. E., who 
certified ^' that there were indeed two small lacerations in the hymen, 
but that as far as medical science could prove it, these must have 
existed before the day mentioned (?), therefore this physician 
assumed that defloration must have taken place previous to the day 
in question. Dr. E. has given no farther description of the appear- 
ances found. Eighteen days after the alleged commission of the 
crime, I was required to examine the girl and shift. I found the 
genital organs perfectly uninjured and in their virgin state; the 
examination gave not the slightest pain, the entrance to the vagina 
was narrow, the hymen quite entire, and without a trace of lace- 
ration either recent or cicatrized. In the shift the blood-stains 
were so copious, that it seemed much more probable that they should 
be ascribed to the occurrence of menstruation — ^which was said not 
to have previously occurred (?) — than to an injury to the genitals 
by rape. Finally, neither seminal stains nor spermatozoa were 
found on the shift; and all this justified me in giving it as my opinion, 
that the genital organs in question are in a perfectly virgin condition, 
and that neither from their examination, nor from that of the shift, is 



318 f 18. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

it to be deduced that any rape at all has been committed upon the 
girl^ or that it has been committed at the time specified. 

Case LX. — ^Forcible gradual Dilatation of Infantilb 
Genitals. 

The incredibly revolting accusation was brought against the 
mother of a girl, aged ten, that '' in order to fit the child for having 
painless intercourse with men, she committed a brutality of this 
nature upon her, in that she at first dilated the vagina with two, and 
subsequently with four fingers, and finally stuffed a longish stone 
into it ! ! '^ I had to ascertain the truth of this, and to decide the 
case according to § 193 of the (former) Penal Code. The delicately- 
formed girl, further developed in mind than in body, was pale but 
healthy. The entrance to the vagina was somewhat wider than is 
usually the case in children at this age ; its mucous membrane was 
slightly reddened and painful to the touch; the circular hymen was 
not quite destroyed, but it had lacerations several lines deep on both 
sides of it; and there was a slight mucous discharge from the 
vagina. ''These phenomena,'' as I stated, "certainly permit us to 
conclude that violence has been inflicted upon the tender genital 
organs. Since, however, no 'disease' nor 'incapacity for work' 
has resulted, and as there has been no ' mutilation,' nor ' depriva- 
tion of the power of procreation,' the violence inflicted cannot be 
considered as a ' severe bodily injury.' " 

Cases LXI. and LXII. — Sape before Eyewitnesses. 

LXI. — A countryman, in the neighbourhood of Berlin, sixty-five 
years of age, was accused of having very frequently sexually abused 
Mary, a girl, aged ten. The last time, a woman, who heard the 
sound of voices in the bam where the two were, from curiosity looked 
through a wooden partition and saw the whole process from the very 
commencejnent, which was a manustupration of the accused by the 
child ! ! The appearances found were, childish breasts and genitals, 
the introitus vaginae dilated, reddened, and very tender when touched. 
The hymen existed, but was swollen and reddened. There was no 
discharge or hsemorrhage ; the frsenulum still existed. Our opinion 
was as follows, "that there had been no complete immissio penis, 
but that the condition of the genitals proved, however, that 



§ 18. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 319 

meclianical violence had been inflicted upon them, from which, how- 
ever (for the queries were in this case also put in accordance with 
the former penal code), no injurious results were to be expected.'^ 

LXII. — ^The workman, K., aged thirty-seven, upon the 11th of 
of April, laid Mary, aged eight years, upon the ground in a church- 
yard, denuded her, placed himself on the top of her, and ejaculated. 
He was seen to do this, and, at the first precognition, he also con- 
fessed everything, alleging drunkenness as his only excuse. A 
physician found, upon the 1 2th of the same month, according to his 
certificate, "The labia minora reddened, and the entrance to the 
vagina injected with blood (?), and tender.^' I had to examine the 
cluld just eleven days after the commission of the deed, and found 
her perfectly healthy, with nothing in the least degree anormal about 
her genitals, so that I had to declare, that no conclusion can be 
drawn from the state of the genitals as to any sexual brutality having 
been committed upon her. 

Case LXIII. — How has Rape been Committed P 

On account of the singularity of this question, I do not consider 
myself justified in putting this case aside along with the vast number 
of other cases which cannot be related here. A bookbinder was said 
to have had unchaste commerce in his shop with a girl aged fourteen, 
at the time of its discovery, once or twice every week for a year and 
a-half, and besides the determination of the fact audits consequences 
as to health, it was also required to ascertain "whether it was probable 
that M. had only manipulated with his hand, and had neither entered 
the vagina with his penis nor made any attempt thereto ? '^ (The case 
occurred nineteen years ago, consequently before the promulgation 
of the New Penal Code.) I found the girl so little developed that 
she scarcely seemed to be twelve years old. The labia majora were 
flaccid and withered, and they gaped somewhat. The entrance was 
dilated, particularly at the inferior commissure, which was very 
striking in a girl of her age. The mucous membrane of the nymphse, 
the anterior part of the introitus vaginae, with the aperture of the 
urethra, the prepuce of the clitoris and the hymen were of a bright 
and florid red, and so irritated that the slightest touch was extremely 
painful. The hymen was entire, but inflammatorily swollen; and 
this had been also observed and certified to by another physician 
fourteen days previously ; its aperture was unusually dilated. No 



320 f 18. ILLUSTRATIVE CAS£S. 

discharge, nor anything else anonnal was observed. The shifty 
which had been put on to-day, was clean, but two shifts previously 
worn exhibited numerous yellowish-green mucous stains. Both the 
parents declared that the child for a long time had been remarkably 
tottering on her legs, but that she had never complained of pain in 
passing urine or feeces. I declared that the virginity of the girl was 
uninjured, but that it was improbable that mere manipulation with 
the finger was all that had occurred. For, besides the visible dilata- 
tion of the lower part of the vagina, which could scarcely have been 
caused by the finger alone, purely onanistic irritation would scarcely 
have produced so great an inflammatory swelling of the sexual parts 
with its results — anormal walk, mucous discharge, &c. Therefore it 
is to be assumed, with very great probability, that M. had at least 
attempted to insert his penis in a state of erection into these genitals, 
which were still so narrow ; and the existence of the hymen is in 
noways opposed to this view. 

Cases LXIV. to LXVI. — Discovbry of Spebmatozoa. 

From many similar cases I select only the following, because in 
them it was ascertained exactly how long a period had elapsed be- 
tween the commission of the deed and the discovery of the zoo- 
sperms in the linen. — LXIV. A man aged thirty-one years, was 
accused of having violated Anna, aged four years, upon the 10th of 
January. After eleven days, upon the 21st, I examined the shift 
and stockings of the child, and found very many spermatozoa. — 
LXV. On the 12th of April, E. (in Pomerania) was iJleged to have 
violated an adult. One week subsequently, we examined the shift, 
which was sent to us. As usual, it was very much soiled with blood, 
faeces, urine, and dirt. On its posterior portion there was in parti- 
cular a stain the size of the palm of the hand, which resembled a 
seminal stain in its map-like appearance, stiflEness, and the darker 
colour of its edges. And in truth, in spite of the packing and 
journey of the shift, very many well-preserved zoosperms were found 
in it.— LXVI. The same thing happened after the lapse of seven 
weeks (from the 12th November to the 30th December). The 
stains in this shift were in front as well as behind. 



§ 18. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 321 

Cases LXVII. to LXIX. — Whether a Bape has been foemerly 
committed, and when was it ? 

Not only the general inquiry as to the commission of the deed, 
but even the probable time at which the alleged crime was com- 
mitted, may be of great importance if the time should happen to fall 
before the fourteenth year of the party injured, at the period when the 
severest punishment is threatened, and yet this age should be long 
past at the time when the accusation is brought forward (p. 284, 
Vol. III.) . This was precisely the case in the investigation against H. 
This married man was alleged to have taken Augusta, who was then 
only nine years and ten months, into his house, and soon thereafter, 
and for three years long, cohabited almost every night with her, so 
that the child was made wet. Subsequently, after the girl was 
allowed to depart, and had arrived at the age of fifteen, H. again 
attempted to establish a connection with her, and his wife informed 
against him. On the 8th of April the forensic surgeon, K., certified 
that the girl had been " long since deflowered, the hymen exhibited 
in the lower part of the middle of its right side a completely cica- 
trized laceration, and in the upper third of the left side another 
tolerably recent laceration (eight or ten days old), which bled on the 
slightest touch. The vaginal mucous membrane was also very florid, 
inflamed, and very painful to the touch, and her shift was much 
stained by a copious yellowish-green discharge.'' The accused, now 
fifty-five years of age, confessed that he had often taken the child 
into bed with him, but that as he was at that time impotent (I !) — in 
his marriage during the interval he had begotten three children ! — 
he had only manipulated with his fingers. On the 24th of April, 
that is sixteen days after the surgeon, I examined the girl, and 
found a considerable amount of fluor albus. The labia pudendi 
covered the nymphse, which were quite rudimentary, the clitoris was 
very little developed ; neither the introitus nor the vagina itself were 
particularly dilated, but they were inflammatorily reddened, and the 
examination even then very painful. The hymen was only partially 
present, and exhibited right and left small warty-like carunculse. 
The great amount of irritation and pain present made me strictly 
cross-examine the girl, pointing out to her the untenableness of her 
statement. After long hesitation, the much ashamed stupid little 
childish thing, though for a year past a menstruating girl, at last 

VOL. ni. Y 



322 S 18. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

confessed that, one evening on the streets, four weeks ago, an un- 
known person decoyed her into a honse, and violently grasped her 
with his hand beneath her frock, so that she cried out and ran ofiF. 
Evidently this was not a true statement. In r^ard to the judicial 
queries, I declared that Augusta must have been deflowered a long 
time ago, but from the appearances found it could not be stated that 
the defloration dated from the year 1852-54, but that it might date 
from that time ; that from the great narrowness of the vagina it was 
not to be supposed that a male organ had been repeatedly introduced 
into it, and that the defloration might have been produced bj 
any other firm body, such as a finger. 

LXVin. — Great attention was excited at the investigation of a 
lawyer, who, from some sordid money matter, as it appeared, had 
asserted that two of his wards, now grown up, had, twelve years ago, 
when the boy was eight and his sister eleven, had incestuous inter- 
course with each other, and that the boy had five times (!) a-day con- 
summated coition. A now deceased young physician had in his 
time certified "that the lower part of the boy's penis (?) was quite 
sore, that he was pale and flabby and his eyes deep sunken, that the 
girl, on the other hand, was rosy-cheeked, strong, and vigorous, but 
that her vagina was wider than usual, and inflamed, ao that it was to 
to be asiumed that the boy had had complete intercourse with his 
sister I " (This is certainly a pattern for a medical certificate in this 
matter, in which the most remarkable certificates have come before 
me in great numbers, and this is my chief reason for giving so large a 
selection of these cases.) The girl, now aged twenty-one, denies every- 
thing, and only confesses to having then practised masturbation. I 
examined her most carefully, and found her to be a perfectly unin- 
jured virgin, in particular she had a quite entire circular hymen 
slightly fimbriated on its left border. I denied (of course!) in 
answer to a question put to me at the time of trial, that a boy of 
dght could possibly have " complete intercourse,'^ more especially 
several times a-day; and as with this the whole accusation fell to 
nothing, the prcHuoter of the accusation was for this and his other 
crimes condemned to two years and a-half imprisonment, to a fine of 
five hundred thalers (£75), and to three years' deprivation of the 
rights of citizenship. 

LXIX. — So decided an opinion could not be given in another case 
in which a father was accused of having, a year ago, " attempted to 
have carnal connection with his own daughter." The child, now 



§ 18. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 328 

twelve years and a-half old, was healthy, her genitals perfectly 
normal, and the very fleshy hymen quite entire. Opinion : it is to 
he assumed with certainty that carnal intercourse has never been 
consummated with H., but in regard to the question whether mere 
attempt at connection has been made upon the child a year ago, the 
examination of the genitals has not afforded any information, ncwr 
could they now be expected to do so. 

Cases LXX. to LXXV. — Alleged Venereal Infection employed 
AS A Peoof of Rape. 

LXX. — Mary, aged fifteen, was stated to have been violated on 
New- Year's night, and four days subsequently I made an examina- 
tion. Here again the girl's method of expressing herself was very 
remarkable, and her confident and certain description of the occur- 
rence was suspicious. " In regard to the condition of her genitals,^' 
I said, " the hymen is perfect and uninjured, as are all the other 
parts of her sexual organs. The only anormal appearance is a sore, 
the size of a threepenny piece, round, with irregular edges, quite 
superficial, with no lardaceous base, and which bleeds very easily. 
This is situate in the pocket between the fourchette and the lower 
point of the left nympha. This cannot be regarded as a venereal 
sore, particularly as one of four days' standing, since it not only 
possesses none of the characteristics of a syphilitic sore, but also a sore 
of that kind could not have attained such a size only four days after 
infection. On the other hand, sores of this character are of frequent 
occurrence in the genitals of children of the lower classes, and owe 
their origin to scrofula and uncleanliness. Since then there is no 
other appearance that supports the accusation, I must give it as my 
opinion that there is no proof to be found in the appearance of the 
body, and particularly of the genitals of the girl Mary, that any carnal 
brutaHty has been committed upon hef .'' 

LXXI. TO LXXin.— Here also veuCTeal infection was said to have 
followed the rape (of two children). I had to examine all the three 
individuals on the 28th of August. — LXXI. '^ Mary, aged six years. 
The child has slightly reddened patches at the entrance to the vagina. 
The hymen still exists uninjured. There is no trace of any sore or 
discharge from the genitals. But upon the pubis and in the groins 
there are a few bright red, not circumscribed patches, similar ones, 
and also a few covered with scabs, are to be found upon the sacrum, 

t2 



324 S 18. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

the buttocks^ and the thighs. These appearances show that there is 
not a single symptom which could justify the conclusion that the 
child has been violated^ and still less that it has been infected with 
syphilis. The ulcerations certijBied to have been found by Dr. E. and 
Suj^eon L. on the genitab of this child in the beginning of this 
months must have been scrofulous^ such as are frequently observed 
among children of the lower classes. The circumstance that they 
were observed upon the pubis and on the back of the body, where 
traces of them are yet to be found, is in favour of this view, as syphi- 
litic sores seldom or never occur on these parts. The rapid healing 
of these sores is also in favour of this view, the dischai^ quite dried 
up in from fourteen to eighteen days, a success which neither Dr. L. 
nor any other physician ever attained with recent venereal sores. — 
LXXU. Augusta, three years old. The child is quite healthy, the 
hymen uninjured; no dischai^ exists, and only the right nympha 
is slightly reddened. Here also, therefore, there was nothing present 
that could justify the assumption of rape having been committed or 
of a venereal infection which had occurred only a few weeks pre- 
viously, and was now completely vanished. — LXXTII. The prisoner, 
twenty-three years of age, who was said to have violated and infected 
the children, is perfectly healthy, and on his genitals there is neither 
any symptom of any venereal disease, nor any trace of any recent 
venereal affection visible. Accordingly, I gave it as my opinion that 
'' the appearances on the three individuals did not confirm the fact of 
there having been any rape and venereal infection inflicted on the 
children at all, and particularly by the accused.'' 

LXXIV. — ^The following case was precisely similar; in it, too, 
serious but unjust evidence was given against the accused by a 
forensic surgeon previous to my examination (on the 25th of De- 
cember). It is stated in the report : " Caroline, aged twelve years 
and a-half, i^ perfectly healthy. And no mucous discharge, nor any- 
thing else anormal, is to be Seen upon her genitals. In particular 
the hymen is entire and perfectly normal, and I must deny all that 
has been stated by Surgeon W. in his certificate of date the 27th of 
November last, as to its dilatability. It is also an error when he 
speaks of a small condyloma on the anus of the child, and from its 
existence deduces the necessarily preoccurrence of a gonorrhoea, be- 
cause the lentil-sized swelling at the anus which he thus regards is 
nothing else than a small and obsolete hsemorrhoidal swelling.'' 

LXXV. — ^As to the prisoner, N., he also is perfectly healthy as 



§ 18. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 325 

regards his genitals. I must, however, leave it undecided whether 
he laboured under the * sequelae of gonorrhoea' on the 27th of last 
month, as certified by Surgeon W. It is, however, certain, from my 
careful examination, both of his urethra as well as of his linen on the 
day before yesterday, that now he has no trace of any mucous dis- 
charge from the urethra (gonorrhoea). It is also certain that W. is 
mistaken in asserting that the frsenum prseputii in N. has been de- 
stroyed by a chancre, since the frsenum is visibly present quite en- 
tire. Finally, I cannot agree with the statement of W, that N. has 
the cicatrix of a former chancre on the corona of his glans. "What 
has been supposed to be this by W. is nothing more than a slight 
depression in the folds of the prepuce, which is of frequent occur- 
rence, and which wants all the usual characteristics of a venereal 
scar ; in particular no part of it is of any depth, and it is not sharply 
defined, and still less is it of a coppery colour. Prom the results of 
my examination it follows, therefore — " 1. That there are no signs of 
rape or of venereal infection on the body of the girl, Caroline ; 2. That 
the prisoner N. is not at present affected with syphilis, and it cannot 
be proved that he has been so previously .'' 

Cases LXXVI. to LXXXII.— Urethral Blennoreh(ea, in 
VARIOUS Stages, the result op Rape. 

LXXVI. — ^This was a case of extremely rare occurrence, the actual 
defloratiou of Mary D., a child of eight years of age, by a Frenchman. 
The vagina was unusually dilated, a greenish gonorrhoeal discharge 
flowed copiously from the urethra, the child had a burning pain on 
micturition, and it was more diflBcult than usual to make an accurate 
exploration of the much-inflamed genitals; this was, however, at 
length managed, and brought to light a recent destruction of the 
hymen. Our opinion was easily arrived at, and could be given with 
certainty. The accused, who was well known (I did not examine 
him) to have been afflicted with gonorrhoea, sought to excuse himself 
by asserting that the child must have been infected by using the 
same chamber-pot with himself. The case was once more brought 
before me that I might have an opportunity of explaining my views 
of this statement. I do not require to state that I declared that the 
possibility of the contagion of gonorrhoea being thus transmitted 
could not be denied, but that this would not account for the dilata- 
tion of the entrance to the vagina, and the destruction of the hymen, 



326 § 18. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

and that the former opinion that the gonorrhoeal dischai^e in the 
child had been produced by the intrusion of a male organ infected 
with gonorrhoea must be maintained to be correct. The accused 
was condemned to penal servitude for many years. 

LXX VII. — ^Paidina, aged six years, asserted to have been violated 
by the railway official, K., was also affected with gonorrhoea. The 
entrance to the vagina was reddened, without being very sensitive ; 
the hymen existed uninjured, while the genitals were otherwise nor- 
mal. I declared that a male organ, affected with gonorrhoea, must 
have been in contact with the genitals of Paulina. I found the 
person accused next day in prison and quite healthy, and even on his 
shirty which had been worn for eight days, there was not a trace of 
any suspicious-looking stain. He confessed, however, that about 
four weeks previously, that is about the 19th of September, he had 
a gonorrhoea, which he represented to have been unimportant and of 
short duration. This explanation caused a further inquiry to be 
made by the investigating Judge, the sense of which may be gained 
from my answer, which was, ^' Since the child Paulina already com- 
plained on Sunday the 30th of September of pain in walking, whilst 
her mother two days subsequently observed stains caused by a dis- 
charge from her genitals upon the body- and bed-linen ; consequently 
it is to be assumed that on the 30th of September an inflammatory 
irritation, such as distinguishes the first stage of gonorrhoea, already 
existed in the girl's genital organs, and as experience teaches that this 
complaint remains latent for from three to seven days after infection^ 
it is therefore also to be assumed that the infection of the child must 
have occurred from about the 22nd to the 28th of September.'' The 
statement of the accused agreed therefore with the actual facts of 
the case. 

LXXVm.— A man-servant, aged twenty-one, confessed to repeated 
libidinous actions with the girl Mary, aged five, but utterly denied 
any attempt at coitus. On the 20th of March the family medical 
attendant certified that the nymphse, aperture of the urethra, clitoris 
and introitus vaginse were bright red and swollen, that the hymen 
was only partially present, that there was also a copious muco-puru- 
lent discharge, and that the child complained of frequent desire to 
micturate, and of pain in her genitals. On the 27th of March I 
found redness and swelling of the parts just mentioned, particularly 
of the clitoris and aperture of the urethra, stiU a considerable amount 
of blennorrhoea, the hymen stiU reddened, and on its left side a dis- 



§ 18. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 327 

tinct laceration. The pain was now but trifling, and the child not 
scrofulous, but rather healthy and blooming. On the same day the 
accused was found to have still some urethral blennorrhoea, and con- 
fessed that at the time of the libidinous action, that is about six 
weeks ago, he had a gonorrhoea. I must declare that it could not 
be correctly ascertained whether the mucous discharge originated from 
the urethra itself, or from the vaginal mucous membrane, since to 
ascertain this exactly, an examination, which would have completely 
destroyed the hymen of this little child, would have been requisite, 
and this I did not think myself entitled to do ; but in any case it 
must be assumed that violence has been not long since inflicted upon 
the genital organs of the child, by some hard body, and that this 
was probably not his index-finger, as asserted by the accused, but 
a male organ in a state of erection* The man-servant was con- 
demned. 

LXXIX. TO LXXXn. — In these four cases the accused when 
arrested were no longer ill of gonorrhoea ; only in the shirts of two 
of them were there a few stains little characteristic ; in one of these 
an extremely trifling, transparent drop of mucus could still be forced 
from the urethra by pressure, and in the fourth the aperture of the 
urethra still adhered lightly. Nevertheless, all the four children, 
from six to ten years of age, abused (not deflowered) by them, were 
strongly infected with gonorrhcea. In one of them the crime had 
been committed eight days, in another only four days before their 
examination. 

Cases like the foregoing are, alas ! of constant occurrence in Ber- 
lin (and certainly also in other large towns) ! 



CHAPTER m. 

DISPUTED UNNATURAL LEWDNESS. 

Statutory Regulations. 

Penal Code, § 143. AU unnatural lewdness committed between 
persons of the male sex, or hy ma/nkind toith animals, is to be punished 
by imprisonment/or not less than six months, or more thanfov/r yea/rs, 
and with temporary deprivation of the rights of citizenship. ( Vide 
also §§ 142 AND 144 of the Penal Code, quoted on p. 276, Vol. 

m. 

§ 19. General. 

Medico-legal science has nothing whatever to do with the mftny 
ancient and learned discussions and disputes in criminal law as to 
the proper definition of the terms, Unchastity, Unnatural Lewdness, 
Sodomy, &c., which even yet in the judgments pronounced in the 
different courts give occasion for the promulgation of the utmost 
contrariety of views.* Forensic medicine only requires to take cog- 
nizance of those kinds of unnatural gratification of the sexual appe- 
tite, by whatever name they may be called in legal science or the 
penal code, which leave more or less evident traces behind them on 
the body, which in disputed cases may be employed as evidence 
against the accused, and the existence of which the forensic physician 
of course is and must be required by the Judge to ascertain. The 
question, therefore now is, which of all the manifold sexual aberra- 
tions, which the imaginations of men in all ages and in every coun- 
try have devised in such frightful numbers, belong to the category 
mentioned, and therefore come within the hmits of competence of 
forensic medicine ? And what are the diagnostic means at the com- 
mand of our science for the completion of the proof of the com- 
mission of such unnatural deeds ? Authors have handled this sub- 
ject most superficially and quite traditionally, and this is very 
readily explicable by the total absence of any personal observations, 

* Vide a recent proof of this, and the decision of our highest tribunal, in 
Goitdammer's Arch. f. preuss. Strafr. V. 2, s. 266. 



§ 19. UNNATURAL CRIMES. 329 

observations which are fortunately only rarely to be made^^ and only 
in large towns.* 

Here also, therefore, the system of quotations, though made in 
hondfidey has been the means of spreading abroad the grossest errors 
in diagnosis. I hold myself in duty bound, therefore, to rectify this 
state of matters, and to make known my experience in every imagin- 

* Since the publication of the second edition of this work, a young 
Parisian physician, A. Tardieu, has published in the Annales d'Hyg. 1858, 
Bd. IX. (also separately, Paris, 1858) an Etude m^dioo-l^gale sur les atten- 
tats auz moaurs, in which, among others, he treats of Psederastia. His sketch 
is based upon the examination of more than two hundred persons who were 
banded together, and their union subsequently broken up. We learn from 
it, in the first place, that in Paris this sexual aberration in men is made use 
of by bands of villains for the purpose of extorting money, and even for 
robbery and murder. The discovery of this fact proved to the author that 
the greater number of his cases were no proper objects for an examination 
which only had respect to the tools employed by the leaders for the criminal 
ends already mentioned. Another and not less number is also to be omitted, 
namely, those only employed in onanistic and similar proceedings, and who 
consequently could not exhibit any traces of the crime, as I shall point out 
more explicitly in the text But Tardieu has written his treatise on this 
important subject with more ardour and fancy than with the necessary 
critical caution ; and I consider it necessary to point out this in order to 
prevent the introduction into science of other and more recent errors in re- 
gard to paederastia, and other forms of unnatural criminality. Thus, for 
example, he assumes the existence, in those who have been the active agents 
in the crime of paederastia, of, ** if not always, yet frequently, a somewhat 
{jdc !) characteristic male organ, which grows smaller towards the glans, 
and is twisted on itself, so that the urinary stream flows towards the right 
or left," which he explains by the screwlike mode of immission required by 
the resistance of the sphincter ani ! Such a statement contains its own 
correction ; meanwhile, it is in the highest degree remarkable that Tardieu, 
who, of his *' two hundred and six cases *' details only nineteen, and those 
only such " as seemed to him the most important,'' only relates one single 
instance of this peculiar form of penis. But when we read these nineteen 
oases, we are horrified by the determinate opinion given, partly based, in 
one case, even on the existence of fistula in ano, in other cases upon haemor- 
rhoids, a somewhat thin penis, &c., as proofs of paederastia ! Can the critic 
allow it to pass, when the author, referring to the criminal gratification 
about to be cdluded to in § 23 of the text, does not hesitate to state, that in 
two such individuals, " who had lowered themselves to the meanest forms of 
sexual gratification, a peculiar form of mouth was found, namely, a wry 
mouth, short teeth (! !), thick, tumed-in (I) lips, completement en rapport 
avec V usage infame auquel eUea servaient*'! J Such descriptions may cause 
the hair of non-medical people to stand on end, but medical men know 
better how to estimate such observations ! 



330 $ 20. PiEDERASTIA. 

able abomination of the kind, all of which have come down from the 
earliest ages to onr present time, with that reserve which the sub- 
ject requires, and confining my statements to what is strictly necessary 
for practice* 

§ 20. PiEDBJRASTlA* 

The appellation j^ederastia (the love for boys or young men), is 
a misnomer for this method of gratifying the sexual appetite between 
male individuab, for I shall relate among the illustrative cases in- 
stances of reciprocal paederastia in individuals far more advanced in 
life. This ^^ horrible mystery,'' as it was very properly pyschologically 
termed by an ingenious public prosecutor in his speech at a trial, 
and which is found to be still more mysterious when its depths have 
been probed,* is of Asiatic origin, and passed vi& Crete into Greece, 
where Athens subsequently became noted for its practice {" Grecian 
love '' ). From Greece psederastia passed to Eome, and the ancient 
poets and authors have given posterity descriptions of the abominable 
alliances and scenes to which it gave rise, particularly during the 
reigns of Tiberius and Caligula, &c. Their description of the results 
produced on the body by this and other similar sexual aberrations, 
afford also the surest proof of the occurrence of syphilis in olden 
times.t This crime has not, however, been put an end to, either by 
Christianity, by civilization, or by penal codes, and even capital 
punishment> with which it was threatened and punished, not only in 
ancient times, but even in our own day in many countries (England 
and America), has failed to eradicate it. In most of those addicted to it, 
this vice is hereditary, and appears to be a kind of mental hermaphro- 
ditism. These parties have an actual disgust at any sexual connec- 
tion with women, and their fancy delights in beautiful young men, 

* In consequence of my formerly published treatise upon this subject 
(Yierteljahrschrift I. 1), I have received an anonymous letter, containing 
the most particular confessions, with inherent proof of its haying been 
written by a young, very rich, and well-born man, in whom this crime is 
congenital, and which gives the most thankworthy disclosures, mingled 
with the bitterest regret for his " misfortune." The entire communication 
bears the impress of the fullest truth, and has only confirmed what I have 
already learned, in a more fragmentary manner, in the course of the dis- 
charge of my official duties. 

t The learned and instructive authority for the whole of this chapter is 
to be found in Rosenbaum*s work. Die Lustseuche im Alterthum. Halle, 
1839, 8vo. 



§ 20. PiEDERASTIA. 331 

and in their statues and pictures, with which they delight to surround 
themselves, and to decorate their apartments. In the case of others, 
on the contrary, this vice is an acquired one, the result of satiety of 
the natural sexual pleasures. And it is nothing unusual to find 
these men, in their gross sensuality, alternating the two sexes I In 
all the large towns of Europe this vice gUdes about enshrouded in 
darkness, impenetrable to the tininitiated ; but there seems to be no 
inhabited spot where it is not to be found. Unknown to the un- 
initiated, I say, for even in ancient times the brotherhood had their 
private means of recognition. The passive party (Pathicus, Cinsedus, 
Androgynus*), had even in Greece his peculiarities by which he en- 
ticed the active one, his womanish costume, his womanish plaited 
hair, &c. And Aristotle, Polemon, Aristophanes, Lucian, &c., 
specify certain peculiarities in the walk, look, demeanour, voice, &c., 
by which both the psederastus and the pathicus may be recognised. 
These men recognise one another ^ and are even at this day found in aU 
classes of society without exception. " We discover each other at 
once,^^ says the writer already alluded to, " at a single glance, and by 
exercising a little caution, I have never been deceived. Upon the 
Righi, at Palermo, in the Louvre, in the Highlands of Scotland, in 
St. Petersburg, on landing at Barcelona I observed parties whom I 
had never before seen, and whom I recognised in a second,'^ &c. ! ! 
But this kind of subjective diagnosis has no existence for the phy- 
sician or the Judge. Not a few of these men who have become 
known to me, have had a somewhat womanish exterior, which they 
have exhibited in their manner of clothing and adorning themselves. 
But quite indubitable, psederasti are also found to present a totally 
different appearance, and, particularly if they are old men, look indo- 
lent, dreamy, and negUgent in their clothing and demeanour, and 
such as belong to the lower classes are externally undistinguishable 
from others of their own rank. In regard, therefore, to the psycho- 
logical cause, and the whole external habitus, I cannot, therefore, sub- 
scribe to the dogma of the old Roman, P. Zacchias, who speaks as 
an actually experienced observer, as I shall by and by point out, 
that " mediei de hac re facile veritatem jpronuntiare poterunt,^ even 
^^ magna cautela adkibita, non neglectis etiam conjeclmris et pra- 
sumptionibus, etiam qua extra artem haheri possunt.f Zacchias, 
indeed, also required the physical signs to be duly considered. 

• That this is the signification of this word, vide Rosenbaum, op. cit,, 
p. 175. t Q'i*<^t, Hb. IV. Tit. II. Qu(B8t. V. p. 382. 



332 $ 20. P^DERASTIA. 

These physical signs in the boys (?) abused according to the 
unanimous traditional doctrines of the Handbooks^ were supposed 
to consist in local and general affections. The local affections were 
supposed to be fretting, bruising, inflammation, and suppuration 
about the anus, paralysis of the sphincter muscle, fistulae, and prolapse 
of the rectum, morbid growths, &c. The general results were sup- 
posed to be emaciation, phthisis, dropsy, &c. But if we inquire upon 
what facts such a positive diagnosis has been based, we shall seek 
in vain for any actual observations. Pahner alone (Handbuch, Vol. 
in.) relates one solitary case of a boy alleged to have been abused 
psederasticaUy and taught onanism by his teacher, in whose anus 
similar appearances to those described were found upon examination. 
Now, in the first place, I must remark that on the body of the active 
party no appearance is of course to be expected ; for even though 
some form of syphilis should be present on the male organ, similar 
to that found on the anus of a pathicM^ this would of course in itself 
prove nothing, as I have had to point out in one case which came 
before me for examination. Then again, I have learned another, 
quite different view, of the matter from the cases which have come 
before me officially, and this has been completely confirmed by the 
very instructive cases related by Dohrn,* as well as by the written 
communication already referred to, namely, that the vice in question 
is by no means practised by all as paderastia in the usual sense of the 
word, as missio penis in anum, but the sexual gratification is obtained 
by means of reciprocal masturbation, a fact which only recently ex- 
plained to me the perfectly negative appearances found upon the 
bodies of men who were indubitably Cinaedi, and as such judicially 
condemned. t In regard now to the estimation of the appearances 
usually said to be found upon the body of the passive party, I have 
never observed any general disease, such as tuberculosis, dropsy, or 
the like, in one single case of the, alas ! very numerous instances, which 
have come under my observation. Of the local appearances, I have 
only twice ( Cases XCI. and XCII.) observed, where the individuals 

* Zur Lehre von der Paederastie, in Casper's Vierteljahrsohriffc, Bd. IV. 
8. 193, &o. 

t I consider it important to give the following quotation from the con- 
fessions already alluded to (p. 330, Vol. III.). " yoM must not imagine 

that we practise p<Bderastia, I have never done this, and / abominate with 

many, or most {sic /) this inclination. We seek our gratification *' , 

&o. " Certainly I do not deny the existence of psederastia in a few degene- 
rate men {sic .'), these also frequently purchase people," &o. 



§ 20. PiEDERASTlA. 333 

were actually forced, a slight laceration of the aphmcter ani j in ano- 
ther case, a slight laceration of the cuticular covering of the anus, with 
pain in the sphincter muscle and in the rectum. I have ohserved 
only two appearances most frequently, a horn-like depression of the 
nates towards the anus, that is, a hollow between the nates, the sides 
of which converge towards the anus, but this is an appearance 
which I have also observed, particularly in old men, in cases which 
were wholly free from suspicion ; and a smooth condition of the sUn 
around the anus, apparently arising from the frequent stretching and 
friction of the skin in those who have actually been passive j)arties 
in this crime. When we separate the buttocks in either sex, we 
observe, as is generally known, a series of folds in the skin, which 
extend concentrically towards the anal aperture. In youth or in the 
flower of manhood these folds are most distinctly visible; but they 
are never entirely lost in aged people. Their absence, therefore, is 
all the more remarkable in those who have been Pathici, either con- 
fessedly or according to all indications. I thought I had made a 
discovery, having never observed any mention of this sign, but I 
subsequently found my discovery, already described by P. Zacchias 
{op. cit.), as follows : — ^^ multo magis frequentem tarn nefandi coitv^ 
usum significare poterit ipsius podids constitutio, qui cum ex natura 
nigosus existaty ex hvjusmodi congressu lavis ac planus effidtur, 
obliterantur enim ruga ilia in ani curriculo existentes oh assiduam 
membri attritionem!* Why this, of all the uncertain, still most cer- 
tain "fundamental proof ^^ has been omitted* by all the subsequent 
transcribers of P. Zacchias, is explained by a passage in the work of 
Michael Alberti {Syst. jurisprud. med,, Hal, 1782, I, § 18). After 
quoting from Zacchias the signs of such a nefandum stuprum, he adds 
" addit Zacchias evanescentiam rugarum in sphinctere ani (he does not 
say, in the sphincter !) oh frequentem attritionem penis, quce. tamen oh- 
servatio rationi et experientice ad amtissim non respondet!" And 
from the absence of personal observation, no subsequent authority 
has ventured to deny this statement. But what right had the pro- 
fessor at Halle to contradict the old Eoman, who had seen so much ? 
Scarcely from his own " experiential' since it is at least remarkable 
that of all the very large number of casu^ and responsa which he 
details, there is not a single casus which has any relation to this 
subject, so that it is not rash to suppose, that Alberti, living a hun- 
* Dohm {op, cit, p. 237) has observed this appearance in his old pceder- 
astic hospitallers, precisely as I have described it. 



334 $ 20. PiEDERASTIA. 

dred years ago, in the very small town of Halle, never once had 
occasion personally to examine a single instance of this crime, so 
that he has followed his rationi more than his exjperientia. The more 
recent authors, particularly the French, none of whom allude to 
these two appearances, assume, on the other hand, along with the 
earlier CuUerier, that a funneUnhouped aperture of the rectum, which 
Cullerier asserted he had found in such subjects in the venereal 
hospital, is a characteristic and diagnostic appearance in Cinsedi. I 
have not observed this appearance in a single case, and even 
Jacquemin, Parent-Duchatelet, and Collineau, who have examined 
a very great number of Parisian prostitutes with the object in view, 
controvert the accuracy of Cullerier's observation,"^ which must 
therefore be denied to exist as an object of science. It is of 
course obvious, that neither of the two somewhat trustworthy ap- 
pearances just described wQl be found where only masturbatory 
paederastia has been practised, as appears from the diary of Count 
Cajus, which will be referred to by and by (Case LXXXIII.) to be 
so frequently done, in which case this mysterious sexual aberration 
seems somewhat to resemble a kind of Platonism ( ?;). In cases of this 
kind I need not say, that the medical jurist will be whoUy unable to 
give any opinion in the matter. Finally, it may also be certainly 
allowed, that when a boy or a young man has been violated by a 
powerful adult with mechanical aid and more or less force, that these 
local appearances, such as lacerations, inflammation, bruises, prolapse 
of the anus, &c., may probably be expected to be found. As already 
remarked, I have only had occasion to observe two such cases, and 
therefore feel myself justified in concluding that this species of 
abominable vice is not of such frequent occurrence in this country 
(Prussia) as it is all over the East, in Russia, Naples, &c., as other- 
wise it would certainly, like the cases of rape in female children, at least 
in many cases, be unable to avoid detection. The following principles 
may be laid down in aid of the diagnosis : — 1. All the local and gen- 
eral appearances referred to by authors as diagnostic signs of pseder- 
astia are not of the slightest value, since they do not rest upon personal 
observation, may all be absent, and generally are so. 2. A trumpet- 
like depression of nates towards the anus is a diagnostic appearance 
worthy of attention in regard to passive psederastia. 3. A smooth 
condition of the skin in the neighbourhood of the anus is the most 
certain of all the uncertain signs of passive paederastia. 

* Parent-Duohatelet, de la prostitution^ &o., I. p. 225. 



§ 21. TRIBADISM.—! 22. SODOMY. 335 



§ 21. Tribadism, 

Even in the Old Testament there is distinct allusion to this form 
of sexual aberration, so ancient is this quasi inverted psederastia, the 
gratification of the sexual appetite between women. The euphemism 
— Lesbian love — ^proves how much it was in vogue in Greece, and 
the ancient poets relate how prevalent it was in Bome. To judge 
from all apparent signs, this form of sexual aberration is of extremely 
rare occurrence with us, and not only have I myself never had oflB- 
cially occasion to investigate a case of the kind> but, so far as I know, 
this vice has never been once mentioned in foro at Berlin, while, on 
the other hand, the cohabitation of libidinous and dissolute women 
in the female prisons and hospitals of Paris has frequently given 
occasion to its occurrence. For this reason, therefore, this form of 
" unnatural unchastity^' possesses scarcely any interest for forensic 
medicine, and this is still further lessened by the fact that it leaves 
no traces behind on the body. Por though Aristophanes jests, in- 
deed, about the use of an artificial penis by the Milesian females, 
who were famous in old times for this form of vice, which would 
certainly produce a physical defloration that might be proved, yet we 
cannot recognise him as an authority in our science. Forberg^s idea 
of an elongated clitoris has just as little foundation, and is supported 
by not one single actually observed case. The name itself (r/t>tj3a8€c> 
fricat/rices of the Eomans) and aU that is known about it leads us 
rather to suppose that here we have before us precisely the same 
aberration, which in the former case attracted man to man, brought to 
bear in attracting woman to woman, and that this vice solely consists 
in bodily contact and friction for the gratification of the sexual im- 
pulse. The forensic physician in any case which may happen to 
come before him must declare himself incompetent, since his science 
neither can nor does possess any means of proving the occurrence 
of this crime. 

§ 22. Sodomy. 

In the twenty-second chapter of Exodus, verse nineteenth, it is 
written, ^^ Whosoever lieth with a beast shall surely be put to death.'^ 
So true it is, as I have already pointed out, that aberrations of the 
sexual instinct have occurred at all times and among all people, and 
always in the same forms. For it is no secret that the unnatural 



336 $ 22. SODOMY. 

connection of men with animals^ sodomy in the restricted sense of the 
word, still sneaks about, though less so in towns than in the open 
country. The parties concerned are chiefly fann-servants and herds- 
men, who at the most vigorous period of their life, find themselves all 
day long more or less alone with their cattle; the crime, therefore, is 
committed by man with a female animal. The ancients give frequent 
accounts (Leviticus, chap, xx., ver. 16), and even in subsequent cen- 
turies we read that women committed abominable lewdness with male 
animals, such as stallions and asses^ and antique works of art, as 
well as similar things of more recent date, reliefs, &c., are brought 
forward as proof of this. But, when we consider the extraordinary dis- 
proportion between the genital organs of the human female, and those 
of the male animals referred to, we must regard these artistic represen- 
tations as merely symbolical exhibitions of an extreme degree of 
female lewdness, such as is so frequently represented in ancient 
art. I do not, however, mean to deny the occurrence of unnatural 
connection between man and female animals, but, it can never be- 
come the object of any medico-legal examination, since it is evident 
that no trace of it can be left on the body of the man, and the advice 
given by one of the more recent Handbooks, that we should ascertain, 
whether human semen can be discovered in the animal^s v£^na, is 
so evidently untenable to any one who knows anything practically of 
medico-legal matters as to require no further consideration here. 
For these things are not brought at once under the notice of the 
professional man, before his aid is required the contents of the 
animal's vagina have long since escaped ! ! * 

* How our honourable ancestors managed in these oases may be seen 
from the two instances related by Zittmann and Tropanneger. Zittman (med, 
forens, p. 1217) relates, that the Faculty of Leipzig responded, in regard to 
a case of sodomy with a bitch, that " in regard to the question whether such 
a sodomitical coitus could have occurred in this or any other manner, we 
cannot well honeste speculate ; but it is not credible that the party con- 
cerned could have been able to practise this lewdness without seizing and 
holding the bitch." (June, 1692). Tropanneger (Decis. Cas. viii. de Sodomta 
cum capra, vacca, et equo, p. 310) refers to the Leipzig case ; and then, in 
regard to the accused, whom he describes as weakminded, sagaciously con- 
cluding, from the circumstances of the self-accusation, '< the impossibility 
of the deed which he says he has committed with the brute," he goes on to 
say, " that the best cure would be, omitting all further investigation, in 
order to avoid scandal, to take him to build the fortifications (penal labour) , 
keep him hard at work, and instruct him better in Christianity '' (1733). 



§ 24. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 337 

§ 23. IrRUM ABB, — ^FbLLAEB. — CUNNIMNGUS. — COPROPHAGIA."^ 

I have had to deal officially with all these abominations ! ! In 
such cases we are for Ihe moment perplexed at the view of humanity 
presented us. When we have seen some drunkard lying senseless^ 
has it not struck us, that there lay the linic between humanity and 
the brutes ? So it is with these ^'unnatural forms of lewdness'^ referred 
to, which have been known from the earliest days, and described and 
lashed severely by the satirists. And yet, so far as I know, throughout 
the whole animal kingdom, Cunnilingus alone, and perhaps Copropha- 
gia, occur as forms of sexual gratification. Irrumare and Fellare are 
practised by man alone ! I The sacred interests of science would justify 
me in more minutely describing what I have learned as to these 
matters, but the still more sacred interests of morality forbid me to 
enlarge upon them. Let every medical jurist, to whom such cases 
may occur, help himself as he best can ! The best advice I can give 
is, that he should declare himself incompetent, which he may do 
with a clear conscience, since none of these abominations leave any 
trace behind, either on the one body or the other, which could become 
an object of examination. 

§ 24. Illustrative Cases. 
Cases LXXXIII. to LXXXVIII.— P^dbrastia. 

LXXXin. — This investigation which brought seven companions 
before me to be examined for psederastia, was novel and unheard-of 
in the annals of psychology and criminal law. It concerned a 
whole company of men, from an old Count Cajus at the top, down 
to the very lowest classes. Unheard-of, I may well say, for who 
ever heard of a written diary containing a daily record of the ad- 
ventures, amours, and sensations of a Psederastus, such as was 
seized when Count Cajus was arrested. The accused at the first 
precognition admitted with the utmost naivete the truth of these 
(neatly and elegantly written, and bound) very voluminous confes- 
sions, and acknowledged with the most ingenuous candour, that for 
six-andr-twenty years continuously he had given himself up to men, 
and that, as was learned from his diary, at least three or four times 
* For learned references, vide Eosenbaum, op, cit 

VOL. HI. Z 



338 § 24. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

a- week I His womanly childishness and his perfect candour made his 
statement, that he did not know that he was doing anything con- 
trary to the law, somewhat credible. He was not otherwise at 
all feeble, or mentally incompetent. At the time of my repeated 
examinations of him, when from his openness and his dia^ t(^ether 
I obtained a great amount of information in regard to all the prac- 
tices of the society, he was fifty-eight years of age, slenderly bmlt, 
with blond ringlets ; he suffered from commencing amblyopia, always 
spoke very low, and had the strange custom of always licking his 
fingers while he spoke. Up to his thirty-second year he had con- 
stant intercourse with women, and he had broken off two intended 
marriages. Then he was seduced by a bawd to '' enjoyment with 
men,** and it was both mysteriously inexplicable and repulsively 
loathsome to hear him in the course of conversation (as in his diary), 

continually express himself in regard to his sensations . 

His genitals were quite healthy and of moderate development; he 
had a double inguinal hernia, and a very withered and decrepid 
body. His nates, which were lean and shrivelled, gaped in a trumpet- 
form, and the rugse round the anus had quite disappeared. The 
aperture of the anus was perceptibly dilated, without being at all 
fannel-shaped. There was no prolapse, lacerations, or any scars of 
them upon the sphincter, and nothing else anormal to be seen, except 
two old and obsolete hsemorrhoidal tumours the size of a hazel-nut. 
The exploration carefully made per rectum caused hiin much pain 
which he confessed having constantly felt when acting as Ci- 
nsedus ! ! And this was all that could be observed by repeatedly 
examining the body of a man^ who confessedly had practised passive 
psederastia for almost an entire lifetime ! Certainly, this is a most 
instructive case,* — ^LXXXIV. Another nobleman, who had been pre- 
viously examined, because suspected of unnatural crimes, he was very 
frequently referred to in CajW Diary, and was far advanced in his fifties, 
but still vigorous. His genitals were perfectly normal, he had no her- 
nia, not remarkably lean hips, no hsemorrhoidal tumours, no lacerations 
in the sphincter ani, and no dilatation of the anal aperture. But in 
him, also, the nates gaped trumpet-fashion towards the anus, and skin 
round the anus was perfectly smooth. — ^LXXXV. The trumpet-like 
depression between the withered buttocks was more remarkable in 
this case, that of the pale-faced N., aged fifty-three, than in either of 

* This old man subsequently died in prison, after many years* confine- 
ment. 



§ 24. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 339 

the fonner two. Cajus in his Diary, frequently mentions him with the 
gresitestjeal(msy! N. also had neither hernia, nor bruising, or laceration 
of the sphincter ani, nor prolapsus, nor hsemorrhoids, nor anything 
else anormal. The smooth condition of the skin around his anus was 
also quite remarkable. — LXXXVI. The fourth prisoner examined was 
a man aged fifty-two, who in his youth had been an actor, and in 
Berlin, as well as elsewhere, had received considerable applause, par- 
ticularly for his performance of female caricatures. He was even 
then quite remarkable for \ds feminine appearance, his ringlets, rings, 
smelling-bottles, &c. Now, his hair and beard were grey, his body 
fat, his firm and fleshy hips gaped trumpet-fashion; his {uius, which 
displayed a small hsemorrhoidal tumour, was as usual closed by an un- 
injured sphincter, his rectum was not dilated, his penis and testicles 
were remarkably small. The smooth condition of the skin round the 
anus was distinctly visible. I may remark, that these four observa- 
tions are extremely instructive, because all these four men had 
been, as recorded by Cajus, quite indubitably passive psederasti and 
companions at his '^ tea-parties,^' so that in them the investigation 
had not to solve a doubt, but only to confirm a fact. — LXXXII. 
On the other hand, in the case of — n — , a man, aged thirty-two, 
who had been a frequent associate of Cajus, and for years had been 
suspected by the police, it was doubtful whether he had taken an 
active or a passive part. He had a strong beard, and his appear- 
ance was that of a youthful male. His penis exhibited no trace of 
any previous venereal disease, it was long and tolerably thin, the 
glans was small, and covered by a very narrow prepuce. The tes- 
ticles were of the usual size, the hips were firm and without any 
trumpet-like depression, the anus was perfectly normal. Consequently, 
there was no proof in this case at least, of any passive psederastia. 
LXXXVin. — ^And, this was also the case in r^ard to Barber L., 
who, from Cajus' Diary, was known to have been his last most 
favoured lover ! He was a fair young man, with little beard, whose 
genitals and nates presented nothing anormal. The radiating rugse 
round the anus were even (in this active psederastus) very strcmgly 
marked. Further, I found precisely similar appearances in the case of 
H., aged twenty-two, who had been formerly a soldier, and who 
allied, he had only been employed for onanistic purposes by one 
of the other parties concerned, which, from what has been already 
stated, was not only probable, but also, of course quite impossible 
to be proved by any medical jurist. 

z2 



340 § 24. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 



Casbs LXXXIX. and XC. — ^Pjsdbeastia. — Venbebal Infection. 

Two men were arrested on account of being suspected of unnatural 
intercourse^ and along with the requisition to examine them^ the 
following question was put to me, ''Supposing them both to be 
diseased, how far does this disease confirm the suspicion of their 
having had unnatural connection with one another, or the reverse ? '' 
My opinion, therefore, in accordance with the requirements of this 
question, had only to be based on probabihties. I examined the 
men on the 27th of June, and reported as follows : — 

TiXXXTX . — " R, a master tailor, aged fifty-four years, asserts 
also to me that he has been sleeping in the same bed with the second 
party accused, E., a journeyman tailor, aged twenty-five, and that 
he has been infected with the venereal disease by him. According 
to the certificate of the physician to the prison, dated the fourth of 
this month, B. on this day (the first of his imprisonment) had 
'ulcerations on his penis, and a broad condylomatous growth at his 
anus.^ At present no ulceration, discharge, or the like is to be 
observed on his penis ; but upon both hips, not in the anal deft, 
there are scabs, which appear to be the remains of what have recently 
been condylomatous growths. The anal aperture is somewhat funnel- 
like depressed, and the cuticular folds which usually surround it are 
completely absent, precisely as is observed in men who have been 
notoriously addicted to passive paederastia/' 

XC. — "E., aged twenty-five, who on the day already mentioned 
was found by the physician to the prison to be affected with 'ulcer- 
ation in his penis and in his throat, and with condylomatous growths 
upon the anus,^ has been cured of the first, and there are only left 
the scars of the now healed ulcerations upon his penis and scrotum, 
but, on the other hand, broad suppurating condylomata are still to be 
seen on both buttocks in the neighbourhood of the anal cleft. E. 
also asserts to me, as he did *at the legal precognition, that he being 
affected with venereal disease had slept in the same bed with B., but 
also denies all unnatural intercourse.'^' 

" These appearances do not prove that there has been unnatural 
intercourse between the two parties accused. Proof of this has not, 
however, been required from me. Of course, each of the parties 
might have been infected with syphilis in the usual way, and might 
then have presented precisely the same symptoms as were formerly 



§ 24. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 341 

observed, and are still to be seen. Moreover, it cannot be denied 
that it is quite possible that R. may have been infected by merely 
sleeping in the same bed with E., abeady affected with syphilis; but 
in this view of the matter it is remarkable that the former should 
have precisely the same forms of the disease on his penis and anus 
as E. has. It is certainly probable that reciprocal contact of both 
the male organs with both posteriors has been the source of the 
infection, and this most easily explains the remarkable totality of the 
symptoms ; and I do not, therefore, hesitate to answer the question 
put to me precisely in its own terms, that the diseased condition of 
the two parties accused is rather confirmatory of the suspicion that 
they have had unnatural connection with one another than the 
reverse.^' The accused were condemned. 

Cases XCI. and XCIT. — ^Enforced P-edebastia. 

The appearances found were quite different in the two following 
cases, which stand alone among all the cases which I have had occa- 
sion to examine, inasmuch as they are instances of rape committed 
upon male subjects, and the investigation was either made at once 
or very soon after the commission of the deed. The first case, XCI., 
was that of X., a servant, aged twenty-one years, who being unable 
longer to endure the loving importunities and bodily injury inflicted 
on him by his master, one morning after the latter had dragged him 
to bed and violated him, as he alleged — his allegations as to the 
circumstances preceding the deed, and the apparatus employed, were 
confirmed on the house being searched — he ran off straight to the 
police, who immediately brought him to me. In this case I found 
a small laceration two lines deep in the sphincter ani on the left side, 
and the whole of the sphincter was irritated and painful to the touch. 
There was nothing else anormal visible on his body. — XCII. The 
other case was that of a boy aged sixteen, who, however, had only 
the corporal and bodily development of a child of twelve. He was 
persuaded by the house painter^ X., to pass the night in bed with 
him, and was then violated. According to the statement of the 
boy, the accused ^^ had bored his penis in behind him, so that he 
had become wet ;'' and subsequently there was both pain in walking 
and in defsecating. On the fifth day after the night alluded to, I 
examined the boy. There was an evident gaping of the nates, and a 
trumpet-like depression towards the anus ; but the most important 



342 5 24. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

appearance waa a recent laceration two lines long, in the skin of the 
lij^t side dose to the anus, which was suppurating slightly. It was 
also somewhat remarkable to find in so young a boy two small blue, 
distended venous sacs in front of the anus. The sphincter was 
uninjured, and the anus was perfectly closed. But the examination 
was very painful to the boy, and his statement, that he still (after the 
lapse of five days) felt very great pain during defeecation, was all the 
more credible that on attempting, at my investigation, to press down 
the rectum, the pain was so great as to cause the boy to cry. Our 
decision was as follows : — ^The investigation has revealed the existence 
of facts which support the accusation. 

Case XCIII. — P-fiDERAsriA enforced by a Boy on a Boy. — Zoo- 
SPERMS. — Capacity op the Boy for Procreation. 

Passing over other cases, I must relate the following very instruc- 
tive one, because it points out an unusual mode of obtaining medico- 
legal proof of the crime, and it was in so fsir perfectly novel. T was 
intrusted witb the investigation by a foreign jury court. A peasant 
woman having observed injuries on the anus of her son, aged eight 
years, had accused a peasant lad, aged fourteen years and a-half of 
having induced him to go with him into the open country by pro- 
mising him a piece of bread-and-butter, of having there abused him 
psederastically. The boy asserted that these injuries were caused by 
a ride upon a cow, which was also proved to have occurred. I found 
on both nates close to the anus, two perfectiy similar, painful, 
reddish-brown, abraded patches, each the size of a walnut, and which 
were already dry ; the anus and all the rest of the body were quite 
normal. In fact, it could scarcely be supposed that these excoria- 
tions could have arisen from the friction of a male organ, whilst their 
origin was much more easily explicable by referring it to a ride upon 
a cow^s back (in August, with linen breeches on). The accused lad 
denied everything. But, I found upon the shirt of the child, which 
was subsequently impounded, and on the lower part of its posterior 
portion, what evidently appeared to be a seminal stain, and the 
microscopic examination (carried out sixteen days after the occur* 
rence) revealed the existence of well-preserved zoosperms. Consider- 
ing now that the child was just eight years old^ and consequently 
could not be supposed to be already capable of forming semen, the 
source of this stain must therefore be certainly sought for in some 



§ 24. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 343 

older male subject; considering further, the position in which this 
stain was found, I did not hesitate to assert that some psederastic 
attempt must have been made upon the child. One month subset 
quently, I had to examine the accused in prison ; I found him to be 
a vigorous, muscular, large-boned lad of the age already mentioned, 
who certainly as yet had no growth of beard, no formed male voice, 
and no hair upon the pubis, — all very remarkable appearances in 
regard to the case in hand I His male organ was of the usual 
dimensions of this age, but the testicles^ still of small size, lay not in 
the scrotum, but dose in front of the abdominal rings. The lad 
confessed to have occasionally had erections. In my opinion the 
gist of the case now lay in determining whether he could be supposed 
to possess already the power of forming semen and the desire to 
ejaculate it, and I answered both affirmatively, of course without 
any reference as to his having committed the abominable crime in 
question. Nevertheless, he was convicted and condemned. It is 
evident that the discovery of zoosperms in the posterior part of the 
shirt of a man already capable of forming semen can be of no pro- 
bative value in disputed cases of this kind. But the occurrence of 
this fact in a child of the age referred to makes this case very 
instructive in regard to any similar cases that may occur. 

Cases XCIV to XCIX. — ^Masturbatory Iebitation in Boys and 

GlELS. 

XCIV. — ^The porter, F., had for long practised masturbation upon 
five boys in the most frightful manner several times daily, he himself 
remaining quite uninjured I The truly ape-like skull of the accused 
was most remarkable, with its forehead so low as to be quite flat, 
and its prominent cheek-bones and upper jaw. I was only required 
to give evidence before the jury in regard to the iiyurious conse- 
quences to the health arising from this misdeed. F. was condemned 
to penal servitude for many years. 

XCV. to XCIX. Only two months later the teacher. P., was brought 
to the same bar accused of having practised the same abomination as 
the porter just referred to, with two boys and three girls from five to 
nine years of age. The questions put before me at the preliminary 
investigation were something quite unusual, and as follows: '* Whether 
it can be decided from the appearance of the genitals of the children 
ihai the injury must have arisen from the manipulations of a third party, 



344 § 24. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

or whether it may not have arisen from the manipulation of the chil- 
dren themselves ? Whether the aihng condition in which some of the 
children have been for some time has any connection with the injury to 
their genitals or not ? Whether there is any danger to the health or 
life of the children to be apprehended from the unnatural treatment to 
which they have been subjected by a third party ?" Otto, aged five 
years, according to the certificate of an official medical man, had ex- 
hibited three weeks before I examined him, "inflammatory appear- 
ances on his male organ with a gonorrhoeal-like discharge,^' which 
had quite disappeared after two days' use of a lead lotion. I found 
the boy to have phimosis, but except that, he was both locally and 
generally in perfect health. Francis, aged six years, according to 
the statement of his mother, had, six weeks before my examination, 
^' a considerable swelling of the penis, with a discharge of thickish 
matter.^' This boy also had now only a phimosis, and was other- 
wise healthy. Louisa, aged nine, according to the certificate of the 
official medical man referred to, laboured under, eighteen days 
before my examination of her, an excoriation, two lines long, on the 
left side of the entrance to the vagina, with painful swelling and 
redness of the parts adjacent. The girl was now locally and gene- 
rally in perfect health, and not deflowered. Louisa M., aged seven 
years, was, at the same time referred to, certified to have a red and 
raw patch the size of a sixpence at the entrance to the vagina. I 
found that this redness had not quite disappeared, but the child was 
otherwise healthy, and not deflowered. Finally, the girl Mary, aged 
six years, was at the time already alluded to, declared to have had on 
the right side of the entrance to the vagina a " considerable redness 
and raw patches.'' At the time of my examination this redness 
was no longer visible ; the child was healthy, and not deflowered. 
My examination, therefore, I declared in my report, had proved no- 
thing in regard to the children Mary and Louisa, which could justify 
the assumption of there having been any previous irritation of their 
genitals. Li regard to the trifling redness of the genitals of Louisa 
M., this miff At possibly have arisen from repeated manipulation with 
the finger, and this could scarcely be supposed to have been done by 
the child's own hand, as she was just seven years of age : but this 
trifling redness might also have arisen from internal causes, as is 
frequently observed in little girls. The phimosis (which may be 
readily removed by a simple operation) observed in the two boys is 
also frequently found where there has been no previous sexual irrita- 



§ 24. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 345 

tion, and is not infrequently congenital. It may also be caused by 
an inflammation of the genital organs, the urethra, or the prepuce. 
The remarkable circumstance that we had here two boys in the same 
house both labouring under phimosis arising from the same alleged 
cause of inflammation, certainly permitted the conclusion to be drawn 
that it had not, as was unknown to the parents, previously existed, 
but had been produced by repeated irritation of the sexual organs, 
while, of course, the tender age of the children made it very impro- 
bable that such irritation had been voluntarily brought about by 
themselves. Accordingly I answered the judicial question as fol- 
lows: that the conditions of the genitals of the boys. Otto and 
Francis, makes it prohMe that they have been manipulated by a 
third party ; also that the morbid condition of the genitals of Louisa 
M. may jpossihly have been produced by similar manipulations. I 
did not assume that the children had been thrown out of health, or 
that there was any anxiety as to their life or future health. The 
accused denied everything, " By God and his blessedness.^' (! !) He 
was, however, convicted. This man had also a most remarkable 
and unusually formed skull, which was large posteriorly, with pro- 
minent cheek-bones and upper jaw. This formation was so remark- 
able that it gave occasion to a question which was put to me as to 
whether any conclusion as to his guUt could be drawn from it ? I 
referred to the peculiarly formed skull of P. (the case previously 
related), who had been condemned shortly before, which this man's 
skull in many points resembled ; but, of course, I denied that any 
conclusion could necessarily be drawn from this. The culprit was 
condemned to penal servitude for many years. 

Case C— Discovery of Pjedebastia on a Corpse. 

This case is also quite unique. A merchant's clerk had poisoned 
himself with sulphuric acid, and there were suspicions of his having 
practised psederastia. The foreign jury court already referred to 
required me to examine this body for traces of this crime. The anus 
was open, and faeces had escaped, but not the slightest value was to be 
placed upon this, which is a daily occurrence in dead bodies. It was 
more remarkable to find two slightly depressed, circular, sharp-edged 
cicatrices, each the size of a pea, situated close together upon the 
mucous membrane of the rectum at the left side, and just within the 
anus. These cicatrices, which had all the characteristics of the scars 



346 §24. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

of chancres, were all the more remarkable that neither ulcerations 
nor cicatrices, nor anything else anormal^ was to be seen upon the 
penis or any other psu*t of the genital organs, and primary chancre 
received by infection in the ordinary way does not usually occur in 
the rectum. Moreover, in this youthful subject (about twenty years 
old) the skin in the neighbourhood of the anus was distinctly smooth, 
and the rug» absents Accordingly, I gave it as my opinion that the 
appearances on the body made it very probable that F. had been 
psderastically abused. 



PART SECOND. 



DISPUTED PREGNANCY. 
Statutory Regulations. 

General Common Law, Part II., Trr. 2, § 2. The hmhaml. 
shall only be heard in opposition to the statutory supposition (the 
legitimacy of all children born during the subsistence of the marriage), 
when he can convind/ngly prove that he has not had matrimonial con- 
nection with his wife in the period between the three hundred and 
second and the two hundred and tenth days previous to the birth of 
the child. 

^S, If in such a case he pleads impotence, then he must prove 
that this has been complete du/rvng the whole of the period referred to. 
(§ 4. respects the absence of the husband^ 

Civil Code, Article 312. Any child conceived during the sub» 
sistence of a marriage has the husband for its father. He may, 
however, deny the paternity of the child when he can prove that from 
the three hundredth to the hundred and eightieth day before the 
birth of the child he has been, from absence or any other cause, physi- 
cally unable to have matrimonial intercourse with his wife. 

General Common Law, Part IL, Tit. 2, § 19. Any child bom 
within three hundred and two days after the death of the husband 
must be regarded as his legitimate child. 

Civil Code, Article 315. The legitimacy of a child bom three 
hundred days after the dissolution of the marriage may be disputed. 

General Common Law, Part II., Trr. 2, § 20. The heirs of 
the husband may dispute the legitimacy of such a child only within, 
the period and for the same reasons which the deceased husband him- 
self would have been justified m employing (Vide §§ 2, 8, 4 above). 

§ 21. Should, however, the appearances of immaturity in the child 
show that it must in the ordinary course of nature have been begotten 
after the decease of the husband, and should the widow also be con- 



348 § 25. DISPUTED PREGNANCY. 

victtd of suspicious intercourse with other men after her husband^ 8 
deathy then the child is to he declared illegitimate. 

Ibidem^ Pabt I., Trr. 1, § 20. Widows and divorced wives are 
not permitted to marry again till nine months after the dissolution of 
the former marriage. 

§ 22. The ordinary Judge may permit a widow or divorced wife 
to marry again before the lapse of nine monthSy when it appears from 
circumstances and the opinion of the expert that it is not probable 
that she is pregnant. 

§ 23. Any such dispensation shall not, however, be granted pre- 
vious to the lapse of three months after the dissolution of the former 
marriage. 

Civil Code, Abticlb 228. No wife can marry a^ai/n till cfter 
the lapse of ten months after the dissolution of the former mar- 
riage. 

General Common Law, Paet II., Tit. 2, § 22. Should a widow 
have married again too soon, contrary to statute, so that it may he 
doubtful whether the child bom during the subsistence of this other 
marriage have been begotten during it or during the former one, due 
attention must be paid to the usual epoch, namely, the two hundred 
and seventieth day before the birth. 

§ 23. Should this day fall within the lifetime of the former 
husband, the infant is to he regarded as his legitimate child. {8fc.) 

Ibidem, Pabt II., Trr. 1, § 1077. The party defloweredcan only 
sue for the statutory indemnification, when the confinement occurs 
between the two hxmdred and tenth and the two hundred and eighty- 
fifth day after coition. 

Statute op 24th April, 1854, § 1. A woman who has been 
impregnated, 1, by rape, 2. while in a senseless or involuntary con- 
dition, or, Z. by seduction, &c., is justified in demanding that the 
highest amount of damages prescribed in the Gen. Com. Law, Part 
II., Tit. 1, § 785, be assigned to her. 

§ 6. The Regulation of ^ 2. is also applicable when an innocent 
girl of from fourteen to sixteen years of age has been seduced and 
impregnated. 

§ 15. He is to be regarded as the father of an illegitimate child, 
who has had perfect connection with the mother in the period between 
the two hundred and eighty-fifth and the two hundred and tenth days 
previous to the hi/rth. Bi)en when the intervening period has been 
shorter, this supposition is wellfounded when the appearance of the 



§ 25. DISPUTED PREGNANCY. 349 

fmtus k, in the opinion of the expert ^ in unison with the time of the 
coitus, 

§25. General. 

The purely obstetrical subject of pregnancy has several very 
important judicial relations, and therefore comes also under the 
cognizance of forensic medicine. For example, pregnancy itself 
may be disputed, and may therefore require to be determined by the 
forensic physician, in which case there may be one of two alternatives, 
either pregnancy is actually present, but denied (concealed or dis- 
sembled pregnancy), or vice versd, a pregnancy which has no reality 
is pretended, or alleged to exist, either by the persons themselves or 
a third party (simulated or imputed pregnancy). On the whole, 
disputed pregnancies are not of frequent occurrence, and are of far 
more rare occurrence in forensic practice than is generally believed, 
as I can testify that of many hundred examinations of the living 
subject which I have to perform annually, but very few are in rela- 
tion to questions of disputed pregnancy. Investigations in regard 
to doubtful births are of far more frequent occurrence. And this is 
easily explicable, because pregnancy is a transitory condition of 
relatively short duration, and deceits, false accusations from sordid 
motives, &c., which have reference to it, very soon become untenable 
and come to an end, whilst a confinement is and remains an indelible 
fact. For this reason also pregnancy is much more often disputed 
inforo, in criminal than in civil cases. In the latter, for instance, 
when a woman, after the dissolution of one marriage, wishes to enter 
upon another, and there exists a suspicion of pregnancy, which,, 
however, the statutes {vide above) require to be positively determined; 
or when a party seeks to force a marriage on account of an alleged 
pregnancy, the most short-sighted man will know how to spin out 
the complaint over the few months requisite to decide the truth of the 
allegation, and the case is thus once more removed from the cognition 
of the medical jurist ; or if an heritage be claimed for an unborn 
heir, whose existence is alleged, the same remedy is applicable, as is 
also the case where an adulterous impregnation is asserted by the 
one party and disputed by the other in an action for divorce, &c. 
Actual pregnancies are, as is well known, continually concealed when 
they are illegitimate. But this concealment can in general only hap- 
pen now from modesty, is no longer of any criminal significance, and 
gives no occasion for any judicial or medical interference now that 



860 S 26. DIAGNOSIS OF PREGNANCY. 

in the Prossian, as well as in all our recent statute-books^'^ the 
mere concealment of pregnancy is no longer threatened with punish- 
ment. On the other hand, in criminal law, questions in regard to 
disputed pregnancy arise in cases of allied rape followed by impreg- 
nation; or in cases where procreation is alleged to have taken place 
within the forbidden d^ees (Incest, Case XXVI.), or when preg- 
nancy has resulted from any other illegal and punishable form of inter- 
course, as, for instance, in a case in which one of our jailors had impreg- 
nated a female prisoner ; or in those cases in which an unconquerable 
longing, the re^t of an alleged pr^nancy, is pleaded as an excuse 
for some offence or crime which has been committed ; or when preg- 
nancy is pleaded in bar of some severe punishment, &c. Other 
questions are also frequently combined with that of pregnancy in a 
medico-l^l aspect, as I have already pointed out in the previous 
chapter, such as, At how early and how late a period of female life is 
pregnancy possible ? (§ 8) ; Whether pregnancy can be the result of 
coitus in an unconscious condition? (§ 17, 8ub 3) ; Whether preg- 
nancy may occur previous to menstruation? (§8), &c. And even 
these examples do not exhaust all the combinations which occur in 
actual forensic life, as is evinced by a remarkable case which engaged 
my attrition at a judicial trial sixteen years ago, and which assuredly 
evolved an unexpected question. A physician had abused a woman 
who had been confined just eight weeks previously, and she had de- 
nounced him with the assertion that the result of this abuse had been 
an abortion. At the trial I was asked. Whether a woman could 
become pregnant eight weeks after her confinement? Whether she 
could be aware of her pregnant conditio]i ? and whether she could 
abort eight weeks after her confinement ? The accused physician 
had (of course !) negatived all these three questions. I answered 
the first affirmatively, with the remark that a conception so soon 
after a confinement was of rare occurrence ; in regard to the second 
question, I declared that the recognition of pregnancy at its very 
earliest period was very difficult and deceptive, and of course I gave 
an unconditional affirmative to the third question. 

§ 26. Diagnosis of Pregnancy. 

If the ordinary medical diagnosis of pregnancy is often a difficult 
task, there are still other difficulties in the way of the medical jurist 
* Haberlin, Grundsatze des crim-Rechts, ill. Leipzig, 1845, s. QQ. 



§ 26. DIAGNOSIS OF PREGNANCY. 351 

in relation to this, which do not exist for the ordinary medical 
(obstetrical) practitioner. For to him the party to be examined 
comes with all openness and truth, it is not her interest to conceal 
what she knows or feels, or to add or subtract anything. But 
the party to be examined occupies a difEMrent position in relation to 
the medical jurist. Since, as the question of her disputed and still 
doubtful pregnancy has abeady become a judicial one, that of itself 
sufficiently expresses the fact that either the party herself alleged to be 
pregnant, or some third party has an interest in having it declared 
that the opposite of what really exists be assumed as truth, and be 
taken as the basis for the verdict to be delivered ; that therefore an 
actual pregnancy is alleged by one party or the other not to exist, or 
vice versd a non-existent pregnancy is alleged to be real. The 
medical jurist must at least in every case presuppose the existence of 
such an alternative, since only cases of disputed pregnancy are 
brought to him for examination. For this reason he must estimate 
the various signs of pregnancy with far more caution than an ordinary 
medical practitioner. For medico-legal objects these signs may be 
best divided into the following categories — a. Subjective signs, that 
is, such alterations upon and within the female body which can only 
be observed by the party reputed pregnant, and objective signs, or 
those which may also be observed by the forensic physician; b. such 
alterations as disappear on the cessation of pregnancy, and such as, 
when once produced by a first pregnancy, remain after its cessation, 
and continue, through all the rest of life ; c. such as are relative or 
individual, that is, are peculiar to this or that woman; and such as 
are absolute, wholly independent of individual peculiarities of con- 
stitution, and are consequently common to every pregnant woman. 
In regard to the medico-legal value of these signs, those that are 
subjective and those that may remain from a previous pregnancy are 
of no diagnostic value forensically ; the former, of course not, be- 
cause alleged sensations and perceptions, which are only subjective, can 
neither be proved nor disputed by the medical jurist, who, as I have 
already said, must be continually prepared for lies and deception in 
these matters; and the latter, those alterations which do not dis- 
appear, because in each individual case the thing to be determined 
is the existence or non-existence of a pregnancy now, whilst the 
existence of a former pregnancy is generally not denied, and there- 
fore has not to be determined, though signs of this class when 
present are not always to be placed to the account of a former 



352 S 27. DIAGNOSIS OF PREGNANCY. 

pregnancy. Farther^ all individnal diagnostic signs are of but very 
little yalue^ since the medical jurist^ from the nature of the matter, 
has always to do with subjects whose peculiarities, bodily constitu- 
tion, morbid predispositions, and previous illnesses, &c., are wholly 
unknown to him, and the examination cannot supply him with any 
certain data in regard to them. I shall now proceed to consider the 
various signs in detail. 

§ 27. Continuation. 

Ad a. — ^Among the purely subjective signs may be reckoned, 
1. Nemalgia^ and functional disturbances of the nervous system 
generaDy, toothache, giddiness, a beating pain in the back of the 
head, which Beccaria* does not hesitate to call a rational symptom 
of pregnancy before the fourth month (!), further, to this head belong 
the manifold mental peculiarities, and finally (nervous) vomiting. 
Besides that in thousands of pregnant women these anomalies are 
entirely absent; it is also evident that an assent to any of them on the 
part of the person examined opens up to her the freest field for the 
utterance of all manner of untruths. 2. (Quickening, so long as the 
movements of the child are purely subjective phenomena, and are not 
yet to be objectively appreciated {yide p. 357, further on). Every 
experienced physician knows very well how often women are deceived 
in this respect, and consider and declare bond fide the most various 
proceedings in their interior, even the circulation of wind in their 
bowels, to be foetal movements. Moreover, where pregnancy actually 
exists, all subjective sensations that may possibly be present are care- 
fully concealed by the pregnant woman when it is her interest to 
deny her condition. — Ad b. Amongst those persistent signs which 
may be the result of a previous pregnancy we may reckon, 3. A cir^ 
cular condition of the external uterine ojperture, which after the first 
confinement never regains the transverse character it had in its un- 
impregnated condition, and which cannot, therefore, prove the dis- 
puted existence of pregnancy in a multipara. In the course of the 
very numerous examinations of maidens and wives which I have 
undertaken for various purposes, I have constantly observed this 
diflFerence between the os uteri in those who have never been impreg- 
nated and those who have been so, or who may have been so at the 
time. But even hydrometra, uterine hydatids, and other similar 
* Archives g^n. de M^dic. Tom. 24, p. 443. 



§§ 27. DIAGNOSIS OF PREGNANCY. 353 

diseases occasion a dilatation of the vaginal portion of the uterus 
and a circular condition of its os, and this is another reason for de- 
preciating the probative value of this sign. In regard to this, an 
obstetrician of so much experience as Hohl, remarks,* " by the 
increase of size of the vaginal portion (of the uterus during preg- 
nancy) the two angles of the os uteri are obliterated ; its lips form a 
ring no longer interrupted by these angles, and the external opening 
of the cervical canal appears round because the canal itself is so. 
Upon this circular form of the os uteri, which is never perfect in 
women who have already produced, no value is to be placed as a 
diagnostic sign of pregnancy, since it does not always occur even in 
a first pregnancy, and the os uteri often assumes a circular form from 
natural or morbid menstruation, particularly if attended with hyper- 
semia, or morbid alterations of the uterus.'' 4. A dark coloration of 
the areola round the nipples, which becomes of a dirty brownish-red 
instead of the clear pinky-red of the unimpregnated condition. The 
increased deposit of pigment in the areola which commences in the 
first few weeks of a first pregnancy, I hold to be a good sign, but 
since the coloration persists after the cessation of the pregnancy, this 
appearance cannot be regarded as of any probative value in regard to 
the existence or non-existence of pregnancy at the time of the examina- 
tion. Other pigmentary deposits which are certainly frequently ob- 
served in pregnant women are of much less or no diagnostic value at 
all. Amongst the^e we may reckon the so-called liver-spots (ephelis) 
upon the forehead, face, neck, belly, &c., and a dark-coloured line in 
the middle of the abdominal parietes. The former occur even where 
there is no pregnancy — ^in which they are very often absent — when 
there is any abdominal disease, and just as frequently in males as in 
females ; the latter is also observed in abdominal dropsies, &c., 
and the fallacy of this sign, which was formerly reckoned valuable, is 
now acknowledged by all recent writers on obstetrics.t The ob- 
servations which Elsasser has made upon no fewer than four hundred 
pregnant women are particularly decisive; J from these he obtained 
tlie following results : " the brownish-yellow line in the middle of 
the abdomen and around the umbilicus in pregnant women has, 
in regard to its origin, no causal connection with the pregnancy, in 

* Lehrb. der Gebnrtsh. Leipzig, 1855, s. 195. 

t Vide Hohl, op. cit. s. 187. Soanzoni, Lehrb. d. Geb. IIL 3 Aufl. Wien, 
1851, s. 116. Cred6, klin. Yortr. liher Gehurtshiilfe. Berlin, 1854, s. 375. 
t'Henke's Zeitsohrft f. d. 8t-A. 1852, s. 237, &o. 
VOL. III. A A 



854 § 27. DIAGNOSIS OF PREGNANCY. 

•o fcr as that, in the course of my very numerous obeervations, it was 
found to be entirely absent in many pregnant women, while on the 
other hand it was distinctly observed in many youthful and umm- 
pregnated females. The cuticular colorations in question, therefore, 
of themselves possess a very limited diagnostic value, and none at all 
in a/orenMc poinl of view" 5. The shining, or often more or less 
freckle-like coloured, cicatrix-like lines an the abdominal parietes, 
caused by laceration of the rete Malpighii, are seldom absent in the 
larger proportion of cases of advanced pregnancy, because of the 
considerable distention which then exists, but for that rery reason 
they are of no use as diagnostic signs of pregnancy in the early 
months, because they a«e then still absent. The objection which has 
been urged fipom the fact that such cicatrices also occur when the 
distention of the abdominal parietes has proceeded from another cause, 
sudi as abdominal (ovarian) dropsy, &c., is in itself quite correct, 
but loses much of its exactness when employed in regard to the 
determination of judicial cases of pregnancy, and particularly of 
childbirth, as I shall presently point out [vide § 37). But these 
albugineous lines also never disappear after a first pregnancy, and 
consequently their discovery in a muMipa/ra cannot prove that preg- 
nancy exists at that time. — Ad c. Among the more individual signs 
of pregnancy must be retioned, 6. The coloration of tke vaginal 
mucous membrane like wine lees, which is distinctly observed at the 
entrance of the vagina when it is present, and does not require the 
use of the speculum to get at the deeper-lying portion of its walls. 
This dirty purplish-red colour is certainly very often observed in 
those who are actually pregnant, but it is just as often absent, and 
where it does exist it evidently depends, like 7. the varices on the 
external genitals, on the lower extremities, &c., and also, 8. Hamor- 
rAoidal lumours, upon individual predisposition, fulness of blood, 
abdominal plethora. The absence of these signs, therefore, can 
prove nothing, particularly the perfectly worthless varices and haemor- 
rhoids which, as is well known, are of daily occurrence under the 
most various cireumstances, and are just as often seen in meih- as 
HI women. I shall leave it undecided whether, 9. lAe turgescence of 
the labia nuijora and the perineum^ " the soft swollen condition of 
all those parts which lie between the anterior wall of the vagina and 
the pelvis, the vaginal vault, the cervix uteri, and even the uterus 
itself,'^ upon which Hohl [op, cit. p. 222) puts a special value, is of 
any worth, particularly when we have to determine the existence of 



§ 27. DIAGNOSIS OF PREGNANCY. 355 

a pregnancj during the first three months, — I shall leave it unde- 
cided whether these phenomena do not also belong to the category 
of purely individual signs, and are not to be referred to the same 
causes as those already mentioned ; at any rate I cannot estimate 
their value as very high for the purposes of forensic diagnosis, be- 
cause in their estimation too great room is given to the individual 
opinion of the explorator, who, as I have already observed, has never 
before seen or examined the party to be investigated, and occasions 
for self-deception will b# all the more ready to occur if the party 
examined be a multipara. 

Par more valuable in a diagnostic point of view than those already 
enumerated, are the absolute signs of pregnancy, that is, those which 
have an actual causal connection with this condition, and which 
consequently can never be entirely absent in any case of real preg- 
nancy, when taken in its totality and normal duration, though a few 
of these bodily alterations do also occur as the result of other causes. 
Amongst them may be reckoned, 10. The cessation of the menses on 
the occurrence of impregnation. In the first place, the forensic 
practitioner regards this sign, which possesses a greater popular repu- 
tation than any other, as an early proof of pregnancy, from quite a 
different point of view from the ordinary practitioner. From the 
very nature of the matter it is scarcely possible, except in the case 
of female prisoners, for the medical jurist to assure himself of the 
actual cessation of menstruation. Nothing is easier than for a per- 
son pretending to be pregnant, to declare that she has ceased to 
menstruate for so long, and it is only by a lucky chance that the 
medical jurist is able to take her by surprise with her menses flowing, 
and thus to prove her lying. In general he has no means of ascer- 
taining the truth of this statement. And contrariwise, the medical 
jurist is often attempted to be deceived by those who wish to conceal 
their pregnancy by means of an artificial menstruation, that is, by 
periodically staining the linen with blood, and of this I have seen 
several examples. Now, as there is no difiFereuce between menstrual 
and other human blood (§ 14, p. 287, Vol. III.), any deception of this 
kind can only be detected with certainty where bird^s blood has been 
employed — as I once had occasion to observe in a young girl, who 
was in the habit of killing pigeons for this purpose — whose blood 
corpuscles are readily recognised by their oval form. The diagnosis 
is rendered much more difficult when mammalian blood has been 
employed; but of this I have already spoken (General Division, Part 

4a2 



356 5 27. DIAGNOSIS OF PREGNANCY. 

III., Chapter 11., § 39, Vol. I.). As I have abeady said, it is only 
by chance that the medical jurist has presented to him for examina- 
tion, not the linen merely, but the woman herself, who is alleged to 
be menstruating. In this case, Hohl's proposal * to wash out the 
vagina with warm water, and then to asertain by digital examination, 
whether any blood is still flowing, is both easy of execution and cer- 
tainly judicious, whilst other methods of diagnosing a deception — 
the estimation of the peculiar tui^escent condition of the uterus, 
particularly the softening and intumescente of the cervix, and the 
approximation of the os to the annular aperture, &c. — may give rise 
to mistakes, especially in the case of multipara. The most important 
matter is the untrustworthiness of the symptom in itself. Every 
tyro knows how often from various causes, throughout the whole 
period of the age of fertility, the mensem cease without there being any 
pregnancy in the case. And, besides the occurrence of cases of 
pregnancy without there having been any previous menstruation, 
which are always very rare, it is also very well known that the continued 
persistence of the menses does not exclude the existence of preg- 
nancy, especially not in the first few months, which are precisely the 
most difficult of diagnosis. That this is actually much more fre- 
quently the case than is generally believed, is proved by the investi- 
gations of Elsasser on fifty pregnant women,t in whom menstruation 
persisted after impregnation, in eight cases for once, in ten for 
twice, in one for two or three times, in eleven for three times, in one 
for three or four times, in four for four times, in six for five times, in 
five for eight times, and in two for nine times. For all these rea- 
sons, therefore, the cessation of menstruation is but of very subor- 
dinate value forensically as a sign of pregnancy. — 11. The develop- 
ment of the nipples and their areola (irrespective of the coloration 
abeady referred to at p. 353, Vol. III.), that is, the turgescent con- 
dition of the former, and the prominence of the glandular follicles 
in the latter, does not possess the value assigned to it by so many, 
but is in truth almost useless for our purposes. For it is not a 
constant occurrence, particularly in the early months ; it also occurs 
in those who have been distinctly never impregnated, and when once 
produced by a first pregnancy it never disappears, so that this sign is 
one of those persisting signs, whose value has abeady been estimated 
(p. 352, Vol. III.). 12. The alterations in the situation, position, and 
organisation of the utenis, and particularly of its vaginal portion. 
• Op. cit p. 118. t Henke, Zeitsohr. Bd. 73, s. 402. 



§ 27. DIAGNOSIS OF PREGNANCY. 357 

These changes on the whole do indubitably exist, and in accordance 
with the natural process of development they constantly and gra- 
dually advance, so that it is possible, with sufficient certainty for 
medical practice, to diagnose from them the period of pregnancy 
according to its months, an amount of knowledge absolutely necessary 
for forensic medicine. Amongst these alterations Scanzoni"^ par- 
ticularly mentions 'Hhe progressive and gradually ascending 
softening of the vaginal portion of the uterus, as one of the most 
certain signs of pregnancy, since no pathological condition produces 
so constant a change in this vaginal portion.'^ Of course in any 
matter of this kind, it is but right that I should subordinate my own 
opinion to that of so esteemed and experienced an obstetrical teacher ; 
but 1 may inquire how it came to pass, if the signs belonging to this 
category are so certain, that even the most renowned obstetricians 
were so often wrong (previous to the discovery of auscultation) in 
regard to cases of doubtful pregnancy ? Whoever has often examined 
for himself will agree with Hohl, w^o, after pointing out the great 
differences which exist in regard to this uterine sign in each 
individual case, adds, ^^ whoever seeks to establish a rule for such 
cases, affords a fresh example of Diogenes and his lantern,''t indeed, 
he does not hesitate to say, op, cit. p. 245, " forensic physicians in 
general place too much value upon the condition of the os uteri and 
its vaginal portion, two most untrustworthy parts, and especially so as 
to the diagnosis of pregnancy/' I may also add, particularly untrust- 
worthy in multipara — 13. The alterations in the umbilictis are still 
more untrustworthy, from its primary elevation in the middle of 
pregnancy to its subsequent depression, which are solely caused by 
the considerable distention of the abdominal parietes, and which are 
often enough observed even in men, under similar conditions arising 
from very different causes. 14. The palpable sigvis, which, in contra- 
distinction to the auscultatory, we must call those that are observed 
by feeling the abdomen, or by internal digital exploration, that is to 
say, the feeling of various parts of the foetus thxough the abdominal 
walls, and those movements of the fcetus which are objectively 
perceptible {vide p. 352, Vol. III.) as well the ballottement qfthefcetal 
head per vaginam. These signs are, indeed, only to be observed in 
the second half of pregnancy, and are not consequently available as 
proofs during the earlier periods. Further, the absence of both of 
the former signs does not prove the non-existence of pregnancy, since 
* Oj}, cit, p. 125. t Op. cit, p. 194. 



368 f 27. DIAGNOSIS OF PREGNANCY. 

a great amount of abdominal fat, or a large collection of liquor 
amnii, maj prevent the perception of both phenomena. Finally, 
mistakes may occur in regard to both of these signs when circum- 
scribed, hard, morbid tumours are supposed to be psurts of a foetus, 
or when the arterial pulse of the woman, slight convulsive movements 
of the abdominal muscles, or movements in the bowds, &c., are taken 
for foetal movements. However, a careful and repeated exami- 
nation in different positions of the woman supposed to be pr^nant 
will prevent all these mistakes. And whoever has frequently had 
occasion to feel the foetal movements, or the haUottement of the child^s 
head, will not readily mistiJce them when they are actually present, 
wherefore, these phenomena observed by the sense of touch are, in 
their truly peculiar form and way, a most excellent proof of preg- 
nancy.* — 15. The auscultatory signs, the placental bruit, and the 
foetal pulse. I do not require to estimate the various anatomico- 
physiological explanations of the placental bruit, the most tenable of 
which seems to be that which places its origin in the uterine vessels. 
Independent of the mistakes which may possibly arise from the exist- 
ence of any other tumour of the uterus or ovaries, &c., and which may 
be avoided by repeated explorations in different positions, the placental 
bruit, or bellows-sound isochronous with the arterial pulse of the 
pr^nant woman, is a most valuable sign. But ihd pulsation of the 
fatal heart ascertained by auscultation is well known to be the most 
certain sign of all, in itself alone constituting a most positive indu- 
bitable proof of the existence of pregnancy. Crede has very correctly 
likened this sound to the tic-tac of a watch heard through several 
folds of cloth. Every one, however, has experienced for himself 
that, in regard to this as well as every other auscultatory phenome- 
non, the ear must first be taught before it can hear, and an inexperi- 
enced- or unskilful auscultator wiU, in many cases, only express his own 
want of skill, and not any other fact, when he asserts that ^* the sounds 
of the foetal heart are not to be heard in this case.^' However, these 
sounds are generally, to be first heard only about the end of the sixth 
month, the earlier stages of pregnancy cannot, therefore, be diagnosed 
by means of them ; t further, of course, they are no longer perceptible 

* Soanzoni, op. cit. p. 113. Crede, ojo. cit, p. 390. 

t This statement is based upon my own observations, which agree in this 
with those of the experienced Soanzoni, who {op, cit p. 117) says, that he 
"has never been able distinctly to hear the sounds of the foetal heart before 



5 28. DIAGNOSIS OF PREGNANCY* 359 

after the death of the foetus, and in the case of small and feeble 
children, transverse position of the fdetus, or excessive accumulation 
of liquor amnii, mistakes may readily occur. 

§ 28. Continuation. 

A desire to render the diagnosis of pregnancy as certain as pos- 
sible, both before and also since the discovery of auscultaticm, has 
been the means of introducing into science a number of other signs, 
which must all be rt^rded as deceptive. Nauche^s supposed dis- 
covery of Kiestein, an allied peculiar protein combination in the 
urine of pregnajit women, has been proved by the investigations of' 
Lehmann not to be thi^ but to be merely a collfection of crystals of 
the triple phosphate, vibrioses, and fungi] the glistening fatty 
pellicle on: the surface of the urine when cooled^ does not, occur 
in every pregnant woman, and,, contrariwise, it is frequently found 
in a great variety of other circumstances, as no one any longer 
doubts. A microscopist, so 'experienced as Donne> denies that 
there is any microscopic alteration in the urine of pregnancy. 
Accordingly every symptom based upon supposed alterations in the 
urine, must be struck out. The increased temperature of the vagina, 
upon which Stein, juilr., places confidence, occurs for explicable 
reasons in many pregnant women, but is far too individual a sym- 
ptom to possess any diagnostic value; In an increased degree this 
is also true of the faint, spermatic odov/r of the vaginal mucus 
(Pallender), a symptom which entirely depends upon the cleanliness 
of the pr^nant woman, and is besides purely subjectively dependant 
upon the organ of smell in the explorator, and is therefore perfectly 
untrustworthy and devoid of probative value. The strong vaginal 
pulse brought forward originally by Osiander, and long since given 
up by all as a sign of pregnancy, has been again taken up by one 
of the most recent authors, Cred^,* who says he has found that 
" the arterial pulse in the arteries of the anterior wall of the vagina 
and in the lips of the os uteri was quite remarkably perceptible.'' 
I shall not dispute this ; but I do not require to point out how 
readily a man might deceive himseK in this mattelr. A diagnosis of 
pregnancy after death has been spoken of, and confidence in this 

the end of the twenty-fourth week." Others say they have heard them 
even in the fifth month. 
• Op. ciL p. 373. 



360 §28. DIAGNOSIS OF PREGNANCY. 

respect has been placed upon the presence of a corpus luteum in 
the ovary. Although it is difficult to imagine that this question 
could ever be of any practical forensic importance, yet I may men- 
tion that my observations made in the course of my examinations of 
dead bodies completely confirm those of Bischoff, Hohl, and other 
earlier observers (Everard Home, &c.), that the corpora lutea found 
after pr^nancy are not to be distinguished with any certainty from the 
corpora lutea, the result of the detachment of unfecundated ovula. 
Moreover, were such a question to be put to a medical jurist as. Has 
this deceased person ever been pr^nant ? he would find it much easier 
to answer it from the signs of childbirth {Vide §§ 35 — 37) to be 
found on the body, than from any proof to be derived from a corpus 
luteum. If we ask noV, after all that has been said, how the 
forensic physician must conduct himself in relation to the numerous 
doubts which have been cast upon so many of the signs of preg- 
nancy ? the answer is easy. For, on the one hand, in this respect 
forensic medicine is in a better position than the practical portion 
of our science. The latter may have to act rashly and energetically 
even in doubtful cases, the former — can wait. In civil as well as 
in criminal cases, there can be no danger from delay, and four or six 
weeks — ^till after which the physician may postpone giving his de- 
dsion, explaining to the Judge his reasons for this — are of just as 
little consequence in any disputed judicial case, as they may be im- 
portant and frequently decisive in regard to the opinion of the phy- 
sician. On the other hand, the construction of the (Prussian) 
statutes, at least in a large class of those civil cases which come 
under this head, those relating to re-marriage of widows or divorced 
women, greatly facilitates the procedure of the (Prussian) medical 
jurist (and similar regulations are to be found in every country). 
Because, if the case happens in the old provinces of the monarchy, 
he has only to declare, at any period during the whole course of nine 
months, tlmt pregnancy j[?r(>daJ/y does not exist (§ 22, Tit. 1, Part I., 
Gten. Com. Law, vide p. 348, Vol. III.), and there cannot therefore 
be any difficulty in coming to a decision in any case. And* in regard 
to the difficult period of the first three months, his services will not 
(in the cases referred to) even be put in requisition, in the 
Bhine provinces under the sway of the '^ Civil Code,^* till after the 
lapse of ten complete months ! Nevertheless, there are other cases 
of a civil nature to which we have already alluded, besides all the 
criminal cases of disputed pregnancy, in which the opinion of the 



§ 29. DURATION OF PREGNANCY. 361 

forensic physician may be required. And it is equally true of the 
medico-legal as of the ordinary medical diagnosis, that it must not 
be based upon one or upon a few signs, but upon the scientific 
observation of all the signs taken collectively. By a proper estima- 
tion of these, this question presents now, particularly since the dis- 
covery of auscultation, no difficulty in its solution. 

§ 29. Duration op Pbjignancy. 

Pregnancy commences the moment the mature and separated 
ovulum has been impregnated, and ends the instant the foetus has 
been born. There cannot be any doubt as to this being the absolute 
duration of pregnancy, but doubts instantly arise when we endeavour 
to define the duration of this period with arithmetical exactness, and 
very naturally/ for even in those cases which do not come under the 
cognition of the Judge or the medical jurist, the actual terminus h 
quo, the period of conception, is only accurately known to the phy- 
sician or obstetrician in exceptional cases, and moreover, in judicial 
cases, the mere statement of this period must at once excite doubts 
as to its correctness, just because the case is a judicial one. The 
much-disputed question, however, of the duration of pregnancy, 
would seem to be of no importance for medico-legal practice, since 
all the statute-books contain perfectly positive regulations on this 
point ; for instance the Prussian Common Law recognises no preg- 
nancy as of longer duration than three hundred and two days, while 
the Bhenish ^^ Qvil Code " restricts its duration to three hundred 
days, &c. But science itself cannot be thus fettered, and it would 
be her duty to cause the statute-books to be amended, if she could, 
by means of trustworthy observations show that these regulations 
were actually erroneous. In regard to this, however, we must ever 
remember that the legislator has other objects to consider besides 
purely physiological ones in a question such as this possessing so 
many important relations, and would only make use of the explana- 
tions of science in so far as they would answer his general ends. I 
cannot give a more striking example of this, than that, for example, 
the Prussian Common Law, in the passages already quoted, reckons 
the duration of pregnancy in one place at two hundred and seventy, 
in another at two hundred and eighty-five, and in a third, at three 
hundred and two days ; that it assigns a longer duration to legitimate 
than to illegitimate pregnancy, in regard to which the legislator re- 



36i $ 29. DURATION OF PREGNANCY. 

qtiires no correction from forensic medicine^ for he very well knows 
why he has done so. That twenty-eight days is the nonnal period 
for the recurrence of menstruation^ and that the birth takes place at 
the end of nine months (two hundred and seventy-five to two hun- 
dred and eighty days)^ has been assumed since the days of Hippo- 
crates^ and has been a popular observation in all coantries for thou- 
sands of years. Such a popular observation, however, in a matter 
of this kind is certainly, on the whole, not to be estimated Ughtly. 
Nevertheless, every medical and many non-medical men know full 
well how often errors of reckoning occur among pregnant women 
themselves. And very naturally, since the women themselves very 
frequently do not know the period of conception, because tJiey are 
not usually in the habit of keeping count of their menstrual periods, 
which is in itself a matter of but little interest, because they do not 
know whether to reckon from the commencement or' the cessation 
of their menses, because these had ceased previous to impregnation, 
or had recurred once or twice in spite of it, because mistakes 
readily occur in reckoning from the first sensation of the foetal move-* 
ments, &c. In a scientific point of view also, mistakes are possible, 
independent of other causes, because the separated ovtdum retains 
its capacity for fecundation for from eight to fourteen days, which, 
reckoning from the menstrual period, gives a considerable difference 
in the number of days during which the pregnsmcy has subsisted.* 
Nevertheless, the general rule assumed by obstetrical teachers of 
from two hundred and seventy-five to two hundred and eighty days 
must continue to be regarded as the average mean duration of 
pregnancy. But it is undeniable that there are not a few exceptions 
to this rule, and liiat cases of protracted pregnancy do occur. 
Besides those observations made upon animals,t the like has also 

* Bisohoff, Beweis der von der Begattung nnabhangigen periodischen 
lleifung, &c. Giessen, 1844, 8. 44. The history of the Jewish females is 
remarkably confirmatory of this. In regard to this, Valentin, op, cit p. 819, 
says — ** The Jewish laws forbad the occurrence of matrimonial intercourse 
previous to the twelfth day after the commencement of the menses, and yet 
the Jewish females produced more than the average number of children. 
^ f While omitting all mention of more ancient observations of this charac- 
ter, I may yet refer to those of Krahmer, made upon one hundred and 
seventy-seven ewes, and eleven hundred and ^we cows {vide Henke's 
Zeitschr. f. d. 8t.-Ar.-K. Bd. 67, s. 98) But the value of these observations, 
in relation to their application to the human species, must not be too highly 
estimated. 



§ 30. PROTRACTED GESTATION. 363 

been indubitably proved to occur in women. In a ^'not incon- 
siderable number '^ of cases of pregnancy observed by Hohl, which 
he states were of the '' usual duration/* he found this to be irom two 
hundred and seventy-five to two hundred and eighty-seven days !^ 
In one hundred and fourteen children born " mature/* observed by 
Dr. Merriman, nine only were born at the end of two hundred and 
eighty days, ninety-two per cent, therefore of those observed by him 
were carried beyond this date ; of these twenty-two were, by his 
method of stating the^ matter according to the number of weeks, 
born in the forty-first week ; fifteen in the forty-second, and ten in 
the forty-third week ; one at the end of three hundred and three ; 
one at the end of three hundred and five ; and one at the end of 
three hundred and six days.f But the correctness of these obser- 
vations must be doubted, since Merriman's sfa^tement that fifty-four 
'^mature** children (almost the half of all the cases given!) were 
born betw^n liie thirty-seventh week and the two hundred and 
eightieth day, is contrary to all experience, and leads to the supposi- 
tion that there must have been some error as to the period of con- 
ception. On the other hand, that most cautious inquirer, Elsasser, 
found that in two hundred and sixty cases the pregnancy was 
seventy-one times (= 27*8 per cent.) protracted beyond the two 
hundred and eightieth day, up to the two hundred and ninetieth day 
by 23 '8 per cent., up to the three hundredth day by 1*1 per. cent., 
and up to the tlu*ee hundred and sixth day by 2*8 per cent-J I 
shall by and by refer more particularly to the very instructive and 
important cases published by Schuster, and I omit all mention of 
many statements contained in obstetrical works which coincide with 
those abeady related, in showing that pregnancy may perchance be 
prolonged into the tenth month. 

§ 30. Continuation. — Protracted Gestation. 

Children who are bom after a pregnancy protracted beyond the 
average time, that is more than two hundred and eighty days, are 
called late-births {partus serotini). The importance of this subject 
in relation to various judicial matters, such as the legitimate birth 
of children, with all that may depend thereon, paternity, right of 

• Op. ciL p. 172. t Med.-Chir. Transactions, 1827. 

X Henke's Zeitschrift, Bd. 73, s. 394. 



364 S 30. PROTKACTED GESTATION. 

inheriting, accusation of adultery, &c., has been recognised from the 
earhest times, and judicial cases in which these important matters 
have been a source of contention, because the allegation by the one 
party that a certain late-bom child was conceived at a certain time 
has been disputed by the other, have for centuries given rise to 
controversial writings and opinions by medical jurists and faculties 
in regard to the question of protracted gestation. And the consider- 
ation of this subject affords another proof of the absolute necessity 
that exists for scientific criticism in regard tQ medico-legal matters. 
I will give proof how utterly untenable and incredible both the 
older and more recent cases are, wliich are ever and anon requoted 
as confirmatory of the "fact'' that pregnancy may be protractedyir 
beyond the tenth month, and that it is even possible that it may last 
for eleven, twelve, thirteen, or many more months, and according to 
which, therefore, all the statute-books from the Eoman one down- 
wards, have established the most objectionable regulations. A 
woman* was confined eleven months and fifteen days after the de- 
parture of her husband, who subsequently died. Nothing is stated 
as to the condition of the foetus ! The legal agent for the legitimate 
children disputed the legitimacy of this late-bom child, declaring that 
the mother lived in discord with her husband, that she had once put 
him in prison, and that he had left her with the intention of going 
to the East Indies, &c., circumstances which were certainly more than 
suspicious. The faculty at Halle, however, decided (1727) that it 
was a case of protracted pregnancy, and for this reason that '^ a 
few remarkable, though very rare, cases of the kind are known.'' (!) 
I shall now proceed to relate these older rare cases which were ap- 
pealed to ; they are also to be found quoted as authorities by Henke,t 
who gives no details! In 1630, the faculty at Leipzig declared a 
child bom after an alleged pregnancy of three hundred and nine 
days not to be legitimate, J but the same faculty eight years subse- 
quently declared, without entering into any particulars, that a child 
given birth to by a widow after an alleged pregnancy of one year and 
thirteen days, was certainly one of those qui rarissime et prater 
naturam accidunt,\ A man, who before his death was summe 
debilitatm, died on the second of December. On the twenty-fifth 
of October following — ten months and twenty-three days subse- 

* M. Alberti, Jurisprud. medica, II. p. 554. 

t Abhandlungen a. d. Geb. der ger. Med. 3 Aufl. Bd. III. s. 308. 

X Valentin, Corp.jur. Cas, 35. § Ibidem^ Cas. 36. 



{ 30. PROTRACTED GESTATION. 365 

quently — ^his widow was confined of a child, of which no more accu- 
rate description is given ; but this is unimportant (?) seeing that the 
faculty at Giessen (1689) based their opinion on the following 
" facts.'' ^^ Petrus Aponensis says of himself, that he was an eleven 
months' child; Caldanus says of his father, that he was born in the 
thirteenth month ; Sennert relates a case in which the foetus was 
heard to cry within the uterus during the eleventh month, and was 
very soon thereafter bom in the twelfth month ; the faculty itself 
knows one instance of ttie birth of a girl in the seventeenth month," 
therefore {sic /) '^ the child in question may be helipro legitimo" A 
woman (case related by Zittmann)"^, whose husband had gone on a 
journey, and was subsequently drowned, was confined after twelve 
months. The faculty at Leipzig (1675) declared the child to be 
legitimate, because '' since nature can anticipate the usual termina- 
tion of pregnancy by two whole months, as in the partus septimenstris, 
why should she not also be able to postpone it for two months ?" (!). 
A dissolute wench, who was confined three hundred and twenty-five 
days after the intercourse in question, brought an action against her 
alleged impregnator.t The same faculty (1669) declared this child 
not to be the result of a protracted pregnancy for the following rea- 
sons : — '^ if really, as he states (! !), his intercourse with her was 
absque ejaculatione seminis, and he had no subsequent connection with 
her, while she had intercourse with other men, also since nothing 
happened to the strumpet which could account for the child re- 
maining so long in the womb, also tame7i pariendi terminus at the 
end of the eleventh month is very infrequent and unusual with us,'' 
he is not the father ! ! Such are the cases quoted hy Henke, as giving 
the opinion of the earlier authorities, and which have been copied 
from him into Handbooks and Encyclopsedias. The case quoted by 
Henke from Ingolstadt (Valentin, Nov., p. 15) is not reported on 
by the Faculty of Medicine, but by that of Law, therefore I have 
taken no notice of it here. But I might relate dozens of cases such 
as the above, if it were the object of this work to display book- 
learning. But the following little known, though early case, is too 
precious not to be produced. Petit,t the ardent advocate of the 
possibility of an unlimited protraction of pregnancy, relates the 

• Med. for. p. 452. 
t Zittmann, Med. for. p. 227. 

X Reoueil de pieces relatives k la question des naissanoes tardives. 
Amsterdam, 1766, 8, p. 56. 



966 $ 30. PROTRACTED GESTATION. 

following among many other '' facts^" which the Parisian Aca- 
demy of Science were not ashamed to admit into their Memoirs. 
"A woman in the borough of Jouarre was pregnant for three yearn 
and then produced a stout living boy. About the tenth month she 
had painsy and lost about three quarts of water^ which stopped^ how- 
ever, on her being bled. The history of this fact is testified by the 
signatures of the burgomaster of the place, one notary, and two sur- 
geons.'^ (Therefore it must indeed be true ! !) Petif s opinion, 
founded upon this '^ true history,' ' and many other similar ones, is 
dated the 22nd of January, 1765, and signed by twenty-three Pro- 
fessors of the Faculty and chief medical attendants of Hospitals ! — 
Even the more recent cases are not more capable of standing the test 
of careful criticism. These are to be found in Henke's Treatise, as 
well as quoted by every one else, f odere's wife took pains in the 
ninth month of her pregnancy (i Vepoque \? f\ du neuvieme mois). 
Forty days later the birth took place (what about the child ?). Two 
years subsequently she again became pregnant, and was forced to 
part {sevrer) with her child. After ten months and a-half she was con- 
fined (she also became pregnant while nursing, which always confuses 
the reckoning of women ; had she nursed the former child for two 
years?) At the end of nine months she ^^ again'' (as at the former 
time) had false pains. The girl to which she gave birth was so 
small and miserable {cketive), that the mother did not know she had 
been deUvered, and the child had to be brought up artificially." (A 
child alleged to be born after a pregnancy protracted to three hun- 
dred and fifteen days falls, so to speak, out of the mother's womb, 
and requires to be brought up artificially ! It is evident that the 
case is utterly incredible and badly observed !) — ^Klein reports,* " my 
wife had pains every day for four weeks at the time we calculated " 
(this, no doubt, means at the end of her pregnancy ?). ^^ Every day I 
expected the confinement, which happened about four weeks subse- 
quently, and was very rapid. The child was one pound and a-half 
heavier than my other ones [sic!), it was two inches longer, and the 
fontanelles ^fr^x^ completely cloned (yet the birth of a child such as this 
was said to have been '^ very rapid" ? !). Klein adds, '^I also know, 
quite distinctly, that theOountess of X. was certainly four weeks longer 
pregnant." It is evident that both of Klein's observations are equally 
'^ trustworthy ; " but these cases of Klein and Foder^ are specially 

* Kopp's Jahrbuch, III. b. 252. 



§ 30. PROTRACTED GESTATION. 367 

deserving of being mentioned here, because they are regarded as 
peculiarly valuable from being cases of the " wives of physicians," 
and consequently permitting an accurate determination of the dura- 
tion of pregnancy ; but of this, there is not a single trace to be 
found in the reports. — Listen to the case of Siebold (related by 
Henke, op. cit). A peasant woman supposed herself to be pregnant 
from the date of the last appearance, and subsequent discontinuance 
of her menses. She consulted a surgeon, whom she permitted to 
have intercourse with her, since this could no longer hurt her. She 
was confined precisely forty weeks after this date, though her menses 
had ceased for twelve weeks previously, '^ As is frequently observed," 
adds S., '' during the warm season of the year." It is incomprehen- 
sible how this case, so correctly estimated by Siebold in the sentence 
just quoted, has come to be included among cases of protracted 
pregnancy, since it is evidently (the time of conception being known), 
a very good example of a forty weeks' pregnancy. All the other cases, 
collected by Henke, of pregnancy protracted much beyond the 
average period, give not less scope for criticism ; there is not one 
single instance of correct reckoning among them, nothing but the 
statements and assertions of women. A (Dutch) case, related by 
Salomon (op. cit.) seems to be both simple and instructive, and yet 
it is utterly unworthy of credit, A woman expected her confine- 
ment in November 1807, her menses '' not having been seen since 
the 8rd of January," wherefore, she believed herself pregnant '^Jrom 
that date.'^ In the first days of June she felt the foetal movements. 
" In the beginning of November preparatory pains set in," but not 
till ^'the 26th of January was she deUvered of a dead child, which 
weighed ten pounds and one-quarter." If we assume then, that as 
usual, the foetal movements commenced to be felt about the middle 
of pregnancy, then the child was bom at the end of — tliree hundred 
and seventy-six days ; if however, from the ambiguity of .the expres- 
sion ^^ from that date," we assume, that she was still menstruating 
on the 3rd of January, and probably upon the 8th of January, then 
the child was born at the end of — three hundred and eighty- 
three days : or if finally, we suppose that she had only expected her 
menses on the 3rd of January, and was perhaps impregnated about 
the middle of December, then her pregnancy must have been pro- 
tracted for — ^four hundred and seven days ! In order to give (Ger- 
many) the benefit of the most recent observations, I shall finally 
relate a series of cases that have occurred in England, and have 



368 § 30. PROTRACTED GESTATION. 

been published by Taylor,* cases whieli are allied to prove a 
protraction of pregnancy into the eleventh, ay, even into the 
twelfth month. Dr. Murphy has been peculiarly fortunate in meet- 
ing with these cases, since of one hundred and eighty-two confine- 
ments observed by him, no fewer than ninety-six, exactly one-half, 
occurred beyond the fortieth week, and twenty of these in the 
forty-fourth and forty-fifth weeks after the commencement of preg- 
nancy. Partictdar value is placed upon the instance of the longest 
duration of pn^ancy, namely, three hundred and fifty-two days, 
and still three hundred and twenty-four days, after subtracting 
twenty-eight days from the period of the last menstruation. It 
is expressly added, that the date of the last menstruation was 
recorded hefore parturition took place, to prevent the possibility of 
error. When I state, however, that this, as well as all Murphy's 
other cases, occurred in hospital practice^ consequently in unknown 
women, the duration of whose pregnancy Murphy had no means of 
accurately ascertaining, I thereby express all that can be truly said in 
criticism of these cases, and give the measure of their trustworthiness. 
We are here obliged exclusively to rely upon the statements of the pr^- 
nant women themselves, and besides the manifold and obvious reasons 
which may induce clinical cases of pregnancy (married as well as 
unmarried) intentionally to mislead as to the reckoning of their 
pregnancy, every one knows, how many and how frequently, bond fide 
errors occur in this respect. The case of Chattaway, also published by 
Taylor, is more remarkable; she was a healthy farmer's wife, aged 
thirty-six years, and her confinement took place after a pregnancy of 
three hundred and thirty days. She had menstruated for the last 
time in (?) December 1855, and felt foetal movements in the begin- 
ning of April. About the middle of September she had labour-pains, 
with a muco-sanguinolent discharge, and on the 19th of November, 
1856, she jproduced a child " of the average size.^' Taylor is of 
opinion, that even after subtracting twenty-eight days for the last 
menstrual period, the duration of pregnancy is stiU found to have 
been prolonged for three hundred and thirty days. But the case 
admits of another mode of computation : if we suppose that the 
last menstruation '^ in '' December occurred about the end of the 
month, and further, that the conception took place towards the end 
of January, then we have only a pregnancy protracted for about 
three hundred days, which is nothing incredible. Moreover, nothing 
* Med. Jurisprud. 6 Ed., London, 1868, p. 625, &c. 



§ 31. PROTRACTED GESTATION. 369 

is said as to the usual menstrual cycle of this woman : nothing (so 
necessary for a critical estimation of the alleged perception of foetal 
movements at so early a date) as to whether the woman was a pri- 
mipara. In what other science, may I ask, has there existed for 
centuries so total an omission of all critical inquiry as I have just 
proved to exist in forensic medicine, precisely the one of all others, in 
which the phenomena observed require to be most sharply criticised \ 

§ 31. Continuation. — ^Durition and Dia.gnosis of Protracted 

Gestation. 

Nevertheless it is undeniable that gestation may be protracted 
beyond its average duration of from two hundred and seventy-five 
to two hundred and eighty days (§ 29). But all the teachings of 
physiology and the most trustworthy observations possible agree in 
setting certain limits to this duration. The connection and depend- 
ance of the birth upon a cycle of ten catamenial periods has been 
recognised, as already remarked, from the earliest times. But 
Cederschjold has the merit of having first pointed out that as the 
interval between one menstrual period and another is not unalterably 
the same in all women, but that individual variations are of by no 
means rare occurrence, so there are corresponding individual limits 
within which the duration of gestation may, and, as observation has 
proved, actually does vary, always holding fast to the physiological 
fact that the birth takes place at the tenth menstrual period. Thus, 
in those women from A to X whose menses recur every twenty-eight 
days, 10 X 28 = 280 days = the duration of gestation; in Y, who 
menstruates every twenty-nine days, 10 x 29 = 290 = her gestation; 
in Z, whose menses recur only every three hundred days, 10 x 
30 = 300 days = duration of her pregnancy. Schuster has illus- 
trated this question in a most valuable manner ; he has continued 
Cederschjold^s observations, and in his admirable treatise,* to which 
I refer, he has given four cases, two of which referred to his own 
wife. Her menses recurred every twenty-nine or thirty days. The 
first pregnancy, whose course is accurately described, ended on the 
two hundred and ninety-sixth day, the second continued for exactly 
ten full (individual) menstrual periods, that is, three hundred days. 

• Henke's Zeitschr. Bd. 67, s. 1, &o. ; in which also Berthold's views 
(iiber das Gesetz. der Sohwangerschaftsdauer, 1844), whioh agree in the 
main with Cedersohj old's, but modified, are thoroughly refuted. 

VOL. III. B B 



870 f dL PROTRACTED GBflTATlON. 

A healthy and vigoroue woman^ whote menstruation was of the 
twenty-nine days' type^ was confined on the two hundred and eighty- 
seventh^ and the next time upon the two hundred and eighW-^eighth 
day. — In accordance with all that has been hese set down as to this 
matter^ the following dogmata must be r^arded as sufficient for eat 
guidance. 1. The \MMial duration of pre^gnaney is from two hundred 
and seventy*five to two hundrfid and e^bty daya. 2. Pregnancy 
may, however, indubitably be protracted beyond this, and that even 
as/or as the three kundredtk day. 8. Cases in which pregnancy is 
allied to have heen protracted considerably beyond this, even to the 
eleventh, twelfth, and thirteenth month, have never been determined by 
accurate observations, and allegations of this kind in any individual 
case are therefore completely inadmissible. Hemse it follows that 
the statute-book has assumed a very proper terminus ad quern, and 
science has no reason to desire any alteration of its regulations. 

The diagnosis of ai^y individual case will be always a very difficult 
task. Circumstance;;^ which many authors assume to be of impor- 
t^ce in r^ard to the decision of the case, and which they sup- 
pose to speak for the truth of the allegation of a delayed confii^ment, 
such as the moral reputation of the party concerned, early notice of 
preguancy, &c,, deserve no consideration at all, as every one knows 
who knows anything of life, particularly that kind of life represented 
in the Forum. We cannot allow any value to those actually scientific 
reasons baaed upon the state of health of the woman who had been 
pregnant, and only a negative one to the assertion that the signs 
of over-n^^urity in the foptus prove its birth to have been delayed. 
That anaemia hydrovarium, depressing mental emotions, &c. &c.^ 
should pro<}uce a prolongation of pregnancy is so little proved by 
exp^eiice that we would rather expect ihsi these, or similar aetio- 
logical causes, would p^t a premature end to gestation. And the 
oyer-matpriiy of the foetus is a most variable idea. I have* proved by 
my own observations on two hundred and forty-seven mature — that is, 
bqm at t^ie right time— children, that the weight of these may vary 
from five or six up to ten pounds, and their length from sixteen to 
twenty-two inches; and precisely similar variations may occur in 
regard to all the signs of maturity, as has been long generally known. 
With what amount of scientific conviction, therefore, could a man 
declare a child of ten or eleven pounds, &c., to be one whose birth had 
been delayed ? But I bold that the maturity of the child may be of 

^ Bio-th^atQk>gioal Division, Special Division, $ 80, p. 18, Vol. III. 



§ 32. SUPERFCETATION. 371 

gre4t diagnostic value negatively ; and I would not hesitate to declare 
such^ a child as that of Podere (p. 366, Vol. III.) which " was so 
miserably small when born that the mother did not know that her 
labour was over," was not " over-mature," or the product of a pro- 
tracted gestation. In fact, there are only three Scientific points of 
any value, and where these fail the medical jurist there is nothing 
left him but to unfold his difficulties to the Judge, and to leave him 
to decide according to tjie statrltory regulations, which is, moreover, 
as I have already remarked, what is almost always done. I refer to 
— ^the signs of labour, pains, &c., at the normal end of the preg- 
nancy, which have certainly been observed by careful observers ;* 
secondly, and specially^ the removal of all doubts as to the procreative 
capacity of the alleged father at the alleged time of conception. 1 
may refer to the case observed and described by myself,t in which a 
man aged eighty-two, who for years had laboured imder carcinoma 
of both testicles, was alleged by his wife and former cook to be the 
father of a posthumous child alleged to be the product of an eleven 
months' gestation. The case of Louis there referred to was com- 
pletely similar. A man aged seventy-two had married (1759) a 
woman aged thirty, who, after her husband had lived with her four 
years without having any children, and had died after six weeks' 
severe illness, at the age of seventy-six, brought an heir into the 
world after a gestation of three hundred and seventeen days, the 
commencement of which dated from the day of the husband's death ! 
In such, and in similar cases, where the capacity of the alleged father 
for procreation is indubitably no longer to be supposed, we must 
assume the case to be a cheat, that is, that it is impossible it can be 
one of protracted gestation. The tnird point for consideration is, the 
individual menstrual period of the mother (t?w?^ above). Alas! in 
medico-legal cases, this only gives rise to a fresh difficulty, because it 
is impossible in these cases to obtain any information free from the 
suspicion of untruth. 

§ 32. SUPEEFGSTATION. 

The subject of superfoetatioii is to a certain degree connected with 
that of protracted gestation. Since the days of Aristotle, the im- 

* Fufe, among others, the case related by Dr. Thortsen, of his own wife, 
in Casper's Wochenschrift, 1843, s. 344, and that of Hayn, ibid. s. 771. 
t Vol. III. § 81, p. 31. 

bb2 



372 I 32. SUPERFOETATION. 

pronation of a woman already pr^nant has been termed superfoeta- 
tion, superfecnndation,* and the physiological possibility of this has 
been just as often disputed as asserted from the earUest times down 
to the present day. In regard to this matter it is impossible to deny 
that in itself it possesses not the slightest practical medico-legal 
interest, since there are positive statutory regulations for all such 
cases as may seem to be doubtful, which are thus removed from the 
jurisdiction of the forensic physician ; and this explains the fact of 
there having been only two or three judicial cases of the kind related 
by earUer authors, and that not one single case has ever come before 
me. For instance, if a married woman produce two children, though 
within different periods, and the husband disputes the legitimacy of 
one of them, according to every statute-book the legitimacy of all 
children born during the subsistence of the marriage is presumed, 
when the birth takes place within the statutory time, &c. But also 
in this matter, as well as in that of protracted gestation {vide p. 361, 
Yol. III.), we must not deprive science of her right of independent 
investigation, and her privilege of enlightening the legislature, when 
she can do so by reasons based upon scientific observations. Every- 
one knows that two or more ovula may come to maturity and be 
thrown off simultaneously, and may therefore be simultaneously 
fecundated, as is proved by twin and triplet pregnancies, &c. The 
passage of the human ovulum through the Fallopian tube into the 
uterus may, however, as we now know, occupy from eight to twelve 
days ; and the subsequent fecundation during this period of a second 
ovulum can no longer lie under any physiological doubts. But, for 
similar reasons, the supposition of any superfecundation at any later 
period {e.ff,y months) after the first impregnation is perfectly un- 
tenable.t Soon after impregnation the os uteri is sealed by a 

* Some term the extra impregnation at an early period superfoetation 
(super-eonoeption), and at a later period of pregnancy, superfecundation ; 
but there is no utility in this subdivision. 

t Vide the article on Superfoetation, by Bergmann, in R. Wagner's 
Handworterb. d. Physiol. III., where the idea of superfecundation at a late 
period is also very properly rejected. We have to thank the care of Berg- 
mann for a new proof, in addition to the many similar ones already given, 
of how cases in forensic medicine are copied as "quotations/' without any 
examination. He says, op. cit. p. 140, note : " I must not let this occasion 
pass without pointing out an error which has crept into Kopp's Jahrbuch, 
Bd. III., and from it into several other German works, particularly Henke's 
Lehrb. § 199, note"— (and his Abhandlungen, Bd. II. s. 28):— "But fe^ 



I 32. SUPERFCETATION. 373 

mucous plug, and remains closed during the whole course of 
pregnancy. Soon after fecundation the uterus becomes congested, 
its walls thicken, the decidua is formed, &c., and thus vital changes 
take place in the uterus, completely opposed to its condition when 
unimpregnated ; and when once these changes have occurred, one can 
hardly imagine the possibility of a fresh conception occurring. But 
these reasons would, of course, cease to avail if confronted with 
credible observations of the opposite nature, that is, cases of late — 
after months of pregnancy — superfoetation actually and indubitably 
observed. But no such cases are on record, thoiigh many narratives 
and histories of supposed instances of superfoetation have been pub- 
lished from the days of Zacchias downwards. The oft-quoted 
"observation^' of Delmas, to which I have just referred in the note, 
was perfectly evidently based upon the self-deception of a dissolute 
woman, who had illicit intercourse with several men, and who 
th(mghHyj herself four weeks gone in pregnancy, if she did not 
actually lie and falsify all the data; and in Germany the case — ^by a 
misprint — was rendered miraculous ! Another and not less oft- 
quoted case, is reported * by Fodere, as related by a Dr. Desgranges, 
and seems more truthful. The wife of an herbalist, Eaymond 
Yillard, was confined of a girl on the twentieth of January, 1780 ; 
she had neither lochia nor milk-fever. Three weeks subsequently she 
felt foetal movements, and her abdomen continued to increase in size. 
Desgranges declared her to be pregnant, and on the sixth of July, 
1780, five months and sixteen days after her first confinement, she 
produced another girl, perfectly mature and healthy. The confine- 
ment was normal, and two years subsequently the mother produced 
the two children in health before two notaries at Lyons, " in order 
to certify this fact in a legal manner; and as she stated in this 
notarial attestation, partly to prove her gratititude to Dr. Desgranges, 
and partly to give women who may find themselves in a similar 

readers may have oooasion to ascertain, by personal reference to the Annales 
de la Soo. de M6d. de Montpeilier, that the case by Delmas of a woman who, 
when four or five months pregnant, was said to have conceived again to a 
negro, first assumed this fabulous form in Eopp's Jahrbuch. In the origi- 
nal it is stated that the woman thought herself four or Jive weeks pregnant 
when she received the embraces of the negro. It is also probable that even 
in this she was deceived or lied, since the negro child was much stronger 
than the other, and the woman confessed that she was in the habit of having 
constant intercourse with a white man.'* 
• Devergie, op, cit. p. 471. 



374 5 32. SUPERFCETATION. 

predicament^ and whose husbands may be deceased previous to the 
birth of both of the children, a precedent enfaveur de leur vertu and 
the legitimacy of the child/' For my part, I confess that this remark- 
able proceeding of this woman, so '^ virtuous/' and so grateful to her 
doctor for having delivered her (!), renders the whole case perfectly 
incredible. Without mentioning that we do not learn anything for 
certain as to the bodily condition of the two children when bom^ we 
are justly entitled to ask. What could induce a married woman, under 
ordinary circumstances, to take such an unheard-of step? The 
reasons alleged by her bring to mind the old- proverb, qui i excuse 
i^accuse, and make the motive, purposely to make her husband quite 
pertain, more than probable ! Another " observation which seems 
to Henke to possess probative value,''* is the much-spoken-of case 
of Maton. The subject of it was an Italian la4y> who was confined 
of twins, both previous and subsequent to the birth in question. On 
the twelfth of November, 1807, she produced a male child, of 
'^ proper maturity;" and on the second of February, 1808, that is, 
eighty-one days subsequently (not eighty-six as Henke reckons), she 
produced another male child, '^ perfectly mature." (Nothing is said 
in this case about the placenta, umbilical cord, &c., any more than 
in any of the other cases.) It is evident that this case, of a woman 
who bore twins twice, is nothing else than a third conception of 
twins. The " prop^ maturity," which is an uncertain expression, 
might very well be possessed by the first-born child at the end of, say 
two hundred and ten days, and as the other twin was born eighty- 
one days subsequently, it, as a late-bom child of two hundred and 
niuety-one days, would certainly be ''perfectly mature," and the 
whole case would resolve itself into what has been so often mistaken 
for superfoetation, namely, a twin pregnancy, one of which (alive or 
dead) has been bom prematurely and the other, some time after, a cir- 
cumstance which every obstetrician must have observed, and which is 
described in every work on midwifery. — ^These are the most famous 
'' cases" of superfoetation,t and certainly not one of them is favour- 
able to the supposition of conception occurring months after the 
commencement of pregnancy. But there are still a few cases which 
are apparently more instmctive, those, namely, in which children of 
different races are produced shortly after one another by the same 

* Abhandl. he, cit, p. 40. 

t A case related by Eisenmann has been critically disposed of by Devergie 
loc. cit, p. 470. I refer to his criticism. 



§ 32. SUPERFCETATION. 375 

mother. I have abeady considered (p. 372, Vol. III.) the case of 
this kind related by Delmas. Another oft-quoted case related by 
Buffon is evidently falsified, because a white woman cannot give birth 
to a white and a negro child, but only a mulatto, should sfhe, like this 
South Carolinian, admit the embraces of a white husband and a negro 
shortly after one another. Precisely the same may be said of the 
case of the white American maid-servant,* who produced* twins, one 
white and the other Uack i while two other cases related by Henke, 
loc, cit., of the birth of twins, one black and the other mulatto, and 
one white and the oth^ mulatto ; a similar case by Hille,t and the 
like by Attaway,t and cfther cases of different-coloured twins, inde- 
pendent of mistakes which may be readily made,§ are not at all 
wonderful, since, as I have already shown, a second intercourse fol- 
lowing shortly after the primary one may result in the impregnation 
of two simultaneously maturated (twin) ovola, and this even though 
the two fathers may be of difierent races. In the case of any future 
instance of the birth of a child of different race, after the lapse of any 
consid^able time, na one would hei^tate to disbeUeve the statements 
of the mother, whether- married or not, since in the children pro- 
duced by her she gives the most authentic proof of her dissolute 
conduct and of her having had intercourse with several men, and 
since in every case she may have a hundred reasons for falsifying the 
truth. Who would imagine a case such as this: a woman; after 
being long married without children, and desirous of feigning the 
child of another to be her own, becomes pr^nant, and is at last 
forced to carry out the frauds and to exhibit both children as her 
own, pretending them to be the result of conceptions at different 
periods — superftetation ? And yet suteh a case has occurred !|| 

We must now consider the possibility of superfoetation occurring 
in cases where the uterus is double, which has been doubted. These 
extremely rare cases have even been ijt^rim declared to be impossible, 
because a membrana deddua is said to be formed even in the cavity 
of the second uterus, when once pregnancy has occurred (? A. Meckel) ; 
because the empty uterus is closed by the vaginjd wall forced against 

* Dewees, vide Henke 'a Abh. loc. cit p. 29. 
+ Casper's Wochenschrift, 1843, No. 4. 
: Henke's Zeitschrift, 1855, s. 273. 
§ Ihidemt in an admirable treatise by Albert, s. 272. 
II F. B. Osiander, Handb. d. Entbindnngsk, i. 2 Aufl. TubiDg(>n, 1829 
8. 305. 



37« f 32. superfoetation: 

it by the distention of the pr^nant one (F. B. Osiander) ; because^ 
where the vagina is double^ intercourse through one of them is pre- 
vented by its narrowness (Metzger), &c., — treasons which can be no 
longer accepted as sufficient. Bischoff has proved that both horns 
of a divided uterus may be filled with seminal animalcules by one 
coitus^ and thus a simple twin pregnancy in a double uterus is pos- 
sible. But of course the reverse of this is not excluded, and credible 
facts come again to be inquired after. A case of Cassan is given as 
such in all recent periodicals and books. The original lies before me,*^ 
and it says, ''a woman, aged forty, already the mother of one child, 
produced on the fifteenth of March, 1810,. a small female child 
estimated (sic !) to weigh about four poimds. As the abdomen 
continued of a considerable size, and Madame Boivin^' (the re- 
porter of the case and well-known accoucheur in the Maternity at 
Paris) " suspected the existence of some foreign body in the uterus, 
she made a manual exploration of the cavity, which was much con- 
tracted, but detected nothing. When the tumour, which lay on the 
right side, was gently moved, the cervix uteri moved along with it. 
During two months the woman continued to feel movements within 
this tumour, which were also perceptible to Madame Boivin. On 
the twelfth of May the woman gave birth to a daughter, which was 
estimated to weigh about three pounds, was small and pale, and 
scarcely breathed. This person, who had for long ceased to live with 
her husband, assured Madame Boivin that she had only three times 
in two months, on the fifteenth and the twentieth of July, and on 
the sixteenth of September, 1809, had connection with the cause of 
her shame, as she called him.'' ''In this case,'' adds Dr. Cassan, 
''it is proved to conviction {demontr^ jiisqu'h V evidence), that the 
product of the last conception had occupied a cavity dijSerent from 
that of the first, since, after the extrusion of the first child, its cavity 
was perfectly empty." On the contrary, I hold that it is rather too 
great a strain upon scientific criticism to endeavour to pass off so 
insufficiently described a case as an instance of double pregnancy in 
a double uterus ! No one has taken the slightest trouble to analyze 
it. We do not learn anything as to the state of the child first bom, 
whether it was alive or dead ; nothing as to the condition of the 
vagina, the os uteri, the placentae of both children, which were not 
even weighed, to say nothing of noting the signs of maturity, &c. ! 

* Reoherohes anatom. et physiol. sur les oas d uterus double et de super- 
fetation. Par A. L. Cassan. Paris, 1826, 4, p. S6. 



§ 32. SUPERFCETATION. 377 

And without a thought as to the possibiUty of a mistake by so heed- 
less an observer as this midwife, would it be right to accept the 
simple conclusion that a double uteras existed, as " proved to con- 
viction?'' When I explain the case thus, that the intercourse on 
the sixteenth of September was followed by a twin pregnancy, that 
the first twin was born on the fifteenth of March, at the end of one 
hundred and seventy-nine days (six months), and the second child on 
the twelfth of May, at the end of two hundred and thirty-seven days 
(eight months), and that the midwife was mistaken in the supposed 
result of her examination after the birth of the first child — then I 
hold that this explanation carries with it not less ^' conviction '' of its 
truth, and is more consonant with daily experience than the supposi- 
tion of a double uterus. It is quite otherwise with the case reported 
by Generali,* of a woman who, on the fifteenth February, 1817, 
gave birth to a living, apparently mature, male child, and who, four 
weeks subsequently, on the fourteenth of March, produced a second 
living boy. The first child Uved forty-five, and the second fifty-two 
days. This woman died in 1847, and in her case at least the dis- 
section proved the existence of a divided uterus, each half provided 
with one Fallopian tube. Two other cases related, loc. cit, byDug^s 
and Billengren, in which the existence of a divided or double uterus 
was supposed to be ascertained by manual exploration, not by dissec- 
tion, are not equally convincing with the case just related, but rather 
belong to the same category as the case of Cassan. 

Finally, the possibility of superfoetation has been spoken of in 
relation to those cases in which an intrauterine pregnancy occurs 
during the retention of an extrauterine foetus. These cases are of 
no medico-legal importance, since the fact of an extrauterine preg- 
nancy is seldom or never ascertained with forensic certainty ; the 
foetus can never be born alive,t &c. A woman thus pregnant is to 
the forensic physician nothing else than a diseased pregnant woman. 
In regard to superfoetation, the following principles may therefore be 
laid down : — 1. By far the larger proportion of all the known cases 

* Medio. Vereinszeitung. Berlin, 1850, No. 43. Taken from the Bulletino 
delle scienze med di Torino, 

f A new and very interesting case of this kind is related by Dr. Johnston, 
in the Ed. Med. Journal, for 1856, p. 137, and is quoted in the Prager 
Vierteljahrsohrift, 1857, III. s. 59. A woman, aged twenty-eight, conceived 
and gave birth to a healthy and mature child during the persistence of an 
extrauterine pregnancy, which was ultimately brought to a close by the 
escape of the bones of the foetus through the rectum. 



378 $ 33. UNCONSCIOUS AND CONCEALED PREGNANCY. 

of alleged superfcetation are based upon intentional or se^-deception. 
2. In particular, a large proportion of them are nothing else than 
cases of twin pregnancies. 8. That a woman who has already oon- 
ceived may be again impregnated within a short period, at tl\e latest 
a few days, cannot be denied^ for scientific reasons. 4. The impreg- 
nation of a woman who has been already pregnant for weeks or 
months has not yet been indubitably proved. 5. The possibility of a 
doable impr^uation, where a doable uteros exists, cannot be utterly 
denied. 

§ 33. Uncoksoious akd Concealed Prbokakct. 

Since the Prussian and all the more recent statute-books have 
ceased to threaten with punishment the mere concealment of (an 
illegitimate) pregnancy, the question whether a person may be pr^- 
nant without knowing it has lost almost all its practical value for 
forensic medicine, which it only retains in relation to cases of dis- 
puted abortion, in estimating the amount of blame judicially 
attachable to any one accused of having secretly disposed of a foetus, 
where she alleges (as is so frequently done), that she was surprised 
by the birth, which she had not anticipated, and in a few civil cases. 
In ev«ry case, however, this is a matter easy to be decided. We 
must, in the first place, distinguish between intentional and uninten- 
tional concealment of pregnancy. Like every other medical man, I 
have in the course of my practice very often seen married women^ 
who from large experience were very well acquainted with the signs 
and effects of pregnancy, and who had no desire to have such matri- 
monial blessings continually renewed, incredulous, for a hundred 
reasons, as to their state, up to the very last month of their new preg- 
nancy, and prepared with a plausible explanation for each fresh sym- 
ptom. At one time conception had occurred during suckling, which 
women so incorrectly hold to be impossible ; at another time, the new 
pregnancy happened when it had long ceased to be dreaded, after a 
pause of many years — after so many as thirteen years in one of my 
own cases. Now the signs of pregnancy are obscured by the coexist- 
ence of disease ; and then the intercourse in question is regarded as 
" impossible '^ to have impregnated, and in this matter the most 
experienced matron is just as liable to error as the most inexperi- 
enced maid ; while, at still other times, important irregularities in the 
catamenia have disturbed the reckoning, &c. Numerous cases of 



§ 33. UNCONSCIOUS AND CONCEALED PREGNANCY. 379 

this nature are recorded in the Uterature of this subject. But in all 
such cases of pregnancy bond fides existed, and it is humanly and 
credible, that a young girl of sixteen should quite innocently carry 
about her distended abdomen, because, as she finally confessed, "the 
Baron N., who ha^ conducted her home from a ball, and had been 
with her gnly once, had solemnly assured her that the first time 
never had any result.^^'^ But all ingenuousness and bondfid^s cease 
the instant the case becomes a judicial one, a case where different 
interests clash, and the forensic physician is engaged with it. For 
the most experienced as well as the most inexperiaiced will speak 
maid fide, when in defence of her interests she declares, that she 
knows not, or at least pretends not to know that she — even only once 
— has exposed herself to the causes of pregnancy ! In the course of 
th^ precognitions in the criminal or civil case, ay, even from the 
mere consideration of judicial observatioa being continually directed 
to the condition of her body, the su^ro oi the remarkable alterations 
in her corporeal state during the progress of pregnancy, must become 
known to her in their true signification, and remembering the cmte- 
acta, the beUef of the possibility of a pregnancy must more and 
more force upon her the conviction of its actual existence. The 
former Prussian statutes, therefore, were not unjustifiably harsh in 
denying, that a woman after the completion of the thirtieth week 
of her pregnancy could be any longer ignorant of her condition, and 
the forensic physician will in most cases not err, and will be able to 
answer on his conscience, when he assumes that at least during the 
last third of its continuance pregnancy is no longer unconscious, 
that is, that the concealment of it is not unintentional. The 
only possible exceptions to this may be where there is no re- 
collection of any act of impregnation, that is, in those rare 
instances of impregnation during a state of unconsciousness (p. 298, 
Vol. III.)> or in feeble-minded or idiotic women. And as, in every 
matter, individual cases occur in medico-legal practice of such anoma- 
lous constitution as to constitute an exception to the general rule, so 
also, in relation to this subject, there may be a concurrence of cir- 
cumstances in favour of the pregnant woman. Thus, in a case 
wh'ch, many years ago, was the occasion of superarbitrium by the 
'^Scientific Commission,^^ a young and very weak-minded girl was 
alleged to have concealed her pregnancy up to the time of delivery 
unintentionally, because it was unknown. The reasons which induced 
* Gadermann, in Henke's Zeitschrift, 1846, 3, s. 87. 



380 S33. UNCONSCIOUS AND CONCEALED PREGNANCY. 

the Superior Medical Board to r^ard her assertion as justified were 
as follows : — ^The girl was constantly assured by her seducer, '' that he 
had not come near enough to her to make her pregnant \" that as a 
primipara she had no experience in this matter ; that it was proved 
that she had caught a violent cold while standing in a river washing; 
that she had blamed this cold for the cessation of her menses, which 
occurred shortly after, and for the enlargement of her body, &c, ; and 
finally, that the surgeon to whom she had applied on account of this, 
completely confirmed her opinion, and continued to give her reme- 
dies to bring back her catamenia. I think, therefore, that the 
forensic physician will have no difficulty in any case in deciding 
this question, which is of by no means so frequent occurrence as 
formerly. 

Besides those matters already treated of, the longings of pregnant 
women are also closely connected with the subject of pregnancy, but 
I shall return to this matter by and by (§ 78).* 

* Since those cases of disputed pregnancy which have come before me 
judicially merely required the determination of the doubtful diagnosis, and 
presented nothing peculiar, I do not require to relate them here. 



PART THIRD. 



DISPUTED DELIVERY. 
Statxjtort Ebgulations. 

Vide the Statutes referred to at pp. 1 and 2, and p. 34, Vol. III., 
and also the following : — 

Penal Code, § 138. Whoever substitutes or intentionally ex- 
changes a child, or in any other way intentionally alters or suppresses 
the personal condition of another , will he punished with penal servi- 
tude for not less than ten years. 

Ibidem, § 183. Whoever exposes a child under seven years of age, 
or intentionally leaves such a child in a helpless condition^ will be 
punished with imprisonment for not less than three months. 

If death has been the result of such exposure or forsaking, the 
punishment shall be penal servitude for not more than ten years. 

If this treatment has been employed with intent to kill, then the 
punishment of murder, infanticide, or attempt thereat, is appli- 
cable, 

§ 34. General. 

The fact of delivery may be doubtful, and may become the subject 
of investigation by the forensic physician in all those cases in which the 
previous pregnancy is disputed, which is either presumed to have been 
pretended or concealed (§ 25, p. 349, Vol. III.). I have already re- 
ferred to the reasons why cases of disputed delivery are of much more 
frequent occurrence inforo, than cases of disputed pregnancy. The 
subject of concealed delivery is of far more rare occurrence in regard to 
civil, than to criminal cases. In regard to the first, this question comes 
to be considered in all cases where the pregnancy has been disputed, 
to which is added, in the case of delivery, the question whether a 
child alleged to be bom, may not be merely a supposititious one 
(§ 40). In criminal cases, in every country except Prussia, wherever 
it is suspected that an unmarried woman has secretly given birth to 



382 5 35. DIAGNOSIS OF DELIVERY. 

a child^ — ^for all the more recent statute-books^ except the Prussian, 
threaten with punishment the concealment of deliveiy, or the giving 
occasion to an unassisted delivery,* so that where pregnancy has 
been denied (because concealed) the case must be investigated. But 
in Prussia, idso, in spite of the abrogation of the punishment for 
concealment of delivery, such investigations are of continual occur- 
rence, since the penal code threatens with punishment the secret dis- 
posal of a dead body — such cases being most frequently found in 
practice to be the bodies of newborn children — and also the exposure 
of children ; and women who have been suspected of any of these 
crimes frequently deny both it and also the fact of their having been 
delivered at all. Further, in many other cases, the investigation and 
determination of a concealed deUvery is required when infanticide or 
foeticide has been committed or is suspected, as these cases are some- 
times commenced by an utter denial of maternity altogether on the 
part of the accused. Finally, in these cases there occurs a number 
of important secondary questions, which are closely connected with 
the subject of delivery, such as questions relating to injuries alleged 
to have been received by the child during the act of delivery, or to 
delivery while unconscious, self-delivery and its consequences to the 
child, delivery in the standing posture, the being surprised by the 
birth, the fall of the child on the floor at its birth, &c., questions 
which are omitted now because they have been already fully con- 
sidered.t 

§ 35. Diagnosis op Deuveey. 

It is very well known that it is much more easy to answer the 
question. Has this person actually given birth to a child ? when the 
examination is made within a few days of the actual or alleged con- 
finement, than when it is required to be made after many weeks, 
months, or a much longer timfe. A series of most excellent sym- 
ptoms disappear more or less rapidly after the delivery, and conse- 
quently cannot be employed in making the diagnosis at a later 
period, whilst others certainly remain indelibly imprinted on the 
female body. Though, in general, the determination of a diluted 
delivery is thus one of the easiest tasks in forensic medicine, yet ex» 

* Haberlin, loc, ciL p. 66. 

t Vide Bio-thanatology of Newborn Children in the commencement of this 
Volume (III.). 



§ 35. DIAGNOSIS OF DELIVERY. 383 

perience teaches us that in not a few cases this is not quite such an 
easy matter^ and that it is sometimes perfectly impossible. It is 
not easy to ascertain the fact of a delivery when the foetus has been 
b<Mm at a very early period, or even within the first four or five 
months, and wh^ besides, a long time has subsequently elapsed 
previous to the investigation ; and it is perfectly impossible to deter- 
mine the matter in those cases which so frequently come. before us, 
in which a certain delivery is in question, that is when it is required 
to determine whether the woman, it may be months previously, has 
given birth to a child upon such and such a day, while «he denies 
this delivery, but confesses to having previously given birth to one 
or more diildr^i. Because it is not possible with any ca*tainty to 
distinguish the results of one deliv^ only from those of several by 
an investigation of the changes on the body, specially because the 
various individual bodily peculiarities have in this respect a very 
disturbing influence, sudi, for instance, as the greater or less amount 
of rdaxation of the abdominal parietes present. In a very obscure 
case (CXIV.) which I had to investigate, a married woman, aged 
forty-eight, had accused an old and hitherto irreproachable midwife, 
aged seventy-five, of having forcibly caused her to abort in her 
three last pregnancies, the last of which was said to have happened 
two years previously. Both women were imprisoned. The midwife 
and the woman's husband denied all knowledge of the matter. The 
w(»nan had given birth to seven mature children, was now ailing and 
aged, her breasts, abdominal parietes, and genitals, exhibited the 
results of these numerous deliveries, but not a trace of any injury, 
and we were forced to declare that the medical investigation of this 
woman's body was not capable of being used either in support or 
in refutation of the accusation. (During our repeated examinations, 
however, we observed visible symptoms of mental disease in the 
woman, and we subsequently found her to be actually mentally dis- 
eased and possessed with the fixed idea of this fcetal abortion, not a 
trace of which was discovered in the course of the investigation. 
The innocent old midwife, however, died in prison !) — ^The signs of 
delivery may be divided into transitory and persistent, of which the 
former alone prove the delivery to have been recent, while the 
latter may also be employed as evidence of deUvery that has taken 
place years ago. 



3M f 36. TRANSITORY SIGNS. 



§ 86. Continuation. — a. Transitoey Signs of Dblivery. 

1 . Signs of general indUposition — such as a remarkable paleness 
or redness of the countenance, debility, uncertain walk, moist, warm 
skin, excitement of the pulse. These signs are certainly observed in 
a large proportion of all cases of delivery in private practice during 
the &st twenty-four, forty-eight, or sixty hours ; in medico-legal 
practice other conditions, however, interfere, and these signs lose their 
value. Much depends upon idiosyncrasy, position, manner of life, 
&c. ; and to this we may add, that the woman who has been secretly 
delivered, and has an interest in still concealing the birth, knows 
how to overcome, by the firmness of her will, her debility and ten- 
dency to faint, and this all the more easily, that the party concerned 
is usually a young, vigorous, and healthy person of the lowest 
class, who are, moreover, not in the habit of suffering so much from 
the effects of delivery as the weakly and pampered ladies of the 
higher classes. Besides, it happens, specially in these cases, that from 
the very nature of the matter the forensic physician very rarely is or 
can be in a position to undertake the examination of the woman 
at this early period, in which alone these alterations are observable. — 
2. After-pains, As a means of proof these may be regarded as non- 
existent by the medical jurist, for besides that they scarcely ever 
occur in primipara, and even in muUipara are only felt during the 
first few days after delivery, and therefore during a period when the ex- 
amination is very rarely undertaken, the mere statement of the woman 
who has been delivered, that she has or has not felt after-pains is, as a 
purely subjective assertion, of not the slightest value in judicial cases, 
• — 3. Turgesence of the breasts, which is also evinced in delicate, fair 
women by the appearance of bluish venous cords coursing through 
the skin of the breasts, milk-fever, and milk in the breasts. Of these 
important signs we may omit all reference to the milk-fever, be- 
cause it occurs within the first forty-eight or seventy -two hours, and 
therefore in most cases it has ceased long before the forensic exami- 
nation takes place. Moreover, it is well-known that the secretion 
of milk in many parturient women is wholly unattended by any 
appreciable feverish reaction. The turge^cence of the breasts may 
be very deceptive in young, firm, and stout women, and this all the 
more that the forensic physician lias generally for the subject of his 
examination a person whom he has never before seen. On the 



§ 36. TRANSITORY SIGNS. 385 

other hand^ the appearance of milk in the breasts, which may be 
easily ascertained, even on the dead body in suitable cases, is always a 
most valuable criterion of the occurrence of delivery, though indu- 
bitably milt has also been found in the human breasts, and those of 
all the mammalia, without there having been any previous delivery, 
not only in new-born children, but also in virgins, in widows who 
have long ceased to bear, and even in men. But such cases are, 
on the whole, but very rare exceptions, and can be easily recognised 
as such in any given case by the complete absence of all the other 
signs of delivery. Every doubt will also be removed by a suflBciently 
early examination, that is, within six or eight days subsequent to the 
birth, when the breasts contain only colostrum, which contains a much 
larger amount of fat, milk-sugar, and the saline constituents of milk 
than milk itself, and is yet much more watery, and opalescent, and 
exhibits under the microscope* epithelial d^ris and the peculiar 
colostrum-corpuscles, a conglomerate of small fatty particles held 
together by an albuminous substance. That, moreover, the non- 
discovery of milk does not prove that there has been no delivery, 
needs no remark, as it is very well known that in those who do not 
nurse, as is almost always the case in those women who require to be 
judicially examined, the secretion of milk very speedily, oft^i within 
a few weeks, ceases entirely {vide in regard to the breasts, § 37, 
No. 4). — 4 TAe Lochia^ that is an excretion from the genitals, which 
for three or four days on the average is bloody, then for just 
so long like the washings of flesh, or like yellowish-green puru- 
lent matter, and finally, a pure milky-like mucus, which flows for 
several — four or five, weeks, or for less m those who do not nurse. 
The bloody lochia contain numerous blood-corpuscles, ciliated, 
cylinder, and pavement-epithelium, true pus-cells, and fatty glo- 
bules, but no fibrine. The latter phenomenon may be a source of 
mistakes, in so far as immediately after delivery a great quantity 
of pure blood (therefore containing fibrine) escapes from the torn 
uterine vessels, and mingles with the lochial discharge ; while, on the 
other hand, the absence of fibrine and the other diagnostic micro- 
scopic appearances are very valuable in cases of intentional soiling 
with human or animal blood where delivery has been simulated. 
The decision was more difficult in an important criminal case, the 

. * Good representations of milk and colostrum- corpuscles are to be found 
in 0. Funke's Atlas der physiol. Chemie, 2 Aufl. Leipzig, 1858. Plate xv. 
Fig. 1 and 2. 

VOL. ni. CO 



386 i 36. TRANSITORY SIGNS. 

particnlan of which are unknown to me, in which a foreign tribunal 
sent me a woman^s shift for my examination and opinion, whether 
the deep BaDgnineoos stains upon it w^re the result of menstniation 
or delivery ? Pibrine was distinctly recognised in the dried blood- 
stains ; but this of itself was not dedsive, and there is, moreo ver, no 
diagnostic distinction between menstrual and lochial blood.*^ Only 
the appearance of the blood-stain, which seemed to have arisen from 
a stream of blood, cause me to give it as my opinion that it was 
more probable that this stain had been caused by a delivery than by 
menstruation. When the lochia appear like Hie washings of flesh, 
and subsequently, when they become milky, the blood-corpuscles are 
found gradually to disappear, and the pus-cells and elementary gra- 
nules to lessen in number. From the deceptive similarity of the 
milky lochia with leucorrhcea, the one may very readily be mistaken 
for the other; but the bloody or dirty sanguinolent lochia of an 
earlier period, that is, of the first six or eight days after deUvery^ may 
be recognised with perfect certainty, and much more easily than by 
the microscope, by its perfectly peculiar odour which cannot be mis- 
taken for anything else; and as there can be no mistake possible in 
this matter, since there is no disease of the genital organs in which 
any similar specific secretion occurs, so this primary lochial discharge 
must be re^irded as a perfectly certain diagnostic proof of recent 
delivery. — 5. ItUume^enoe of the labia mqfora, dilatation, reUntation, 
au(f increased temperature of the maternal vagina are signs of sub- 
ordinate importance, and of little value for the medico-legal diagnosis^ 
since they disappear by retrogressive metamorphosis within the first 
few days after delivery, that is to so say, before the examination gene- 
rally takes place, and, moreover, they may be wholly absent in prema- \ 
ture births. — 6. The uterus presents many points of importance for 
the diagnosis. For two or three days after delivery the uterus may 
be felt like a round ball rising above the pubis ; after the lapse of six I 
or eight days it is found to be retracted within the pelvis. After this 
time, also, we can no longer feel the cervix uteri, which hangs down ; 
into the vagina for the first two or three days after delivery, and the^ 
OS uteri is so rapid in its retrogressive changes that though for the 
first few days it is tolerably widely open, yet within a week it isj 
usually completely closed, and it now maintains the circular form 

* This may be of much importance in a case of doubtful abortion. Vi^.l 
joint opinion by Adelon, Le Ganu, and Moreau in the Annales d'Hyg:i^D%f 
publ. 1846, i. p. 186. 



> 



§ 37. PERSISTENT SIGNS. 387 

which it has assumed during (the first) pregnancy. It cannot be 
denied that these so-called uterine signs are also to be found in cer- 
tain pathological conditions of the organ^ but nevertheless they are of 
the utmost value when taken in connection with the other diagnostic 
points. By bestowing a Uttle care in considering these phenomena^ 
the forensic physician can have no difficulty in deciding with certainty 
in any case of disputed recent delivery, provided he be enabled to 
examine the party concerned within the first six or eight days after 
the real or pretended deUvery. 

§ 37. Conhnu/ltion.-— *. pBtRsisxBNT SiONs OF Delivbrt. 

The determination of the case is mach more unceortain when the 
delivery in dispute is not of recent date, but has occurred some time 
previously, since the traces left by any actual delivery are very mate- 
rially modified by the age, bodily condition, ai)id state of health of 
the party in question, as wdl as the age and rdative development of 
the foetus born in each individual case. But even in such cases the 
consideration of the totality of these traces will in most cases 
confirm the decision, though some of th^n may seem doubtful when 
separately considered. These persistent signs are as follow : 1. Ab- 
sence of the hymen, I acknowledge that an abortion at the very 
\ earliest period of pregnancy may pass through the hymen without 
. ; destroying it, but I must declare that those well-known cases which 
a few practitioners think they have observed of the passage of a 
= I foetus quite or nearly mature through the hymen, be it ever so yield- 
""^ ing, without destroying it, are founded in a mistake> which is much 
^^ more easily made in regard to this organ than is generally believed. 
f { The existence of the hymen will always be a proof that there has 
^^' been no birth of a child in the later months of pregnancy (certainly 
'^ not from the fifth or sixth onwards!), whilst its absence proves 
nothing at all in regard to delivery at least. 2. DestrticUon of the four- 
^^^ chette is also in itself an important sign. The frenidum may also 
? . remain uninjured by an abortion; but by an ordinary delivery it is 
^^ always destroyed, and like the hjrmen it is never restored. To 
f**. assume that the fourchette might have been destroyed by an injury, 
5^ such as a fall upon a pointed stone, &c., without there having been 
¥ ^ . any delivery in the case, is a piece of the most unfounded scepticism; 
f' if ever such a wonderful case should occur, besides the abs^ice of 
f all other signs of delivery, there would also indubitably be cicatrices 

C C 2 



t 



iD- 



3S8 I 37. PERSISTENT SIGNS. 

and other results of the injury to be fonnd in the inferior commis-* 
sure and its neighbourhood. 8. A dilated vagina free Jrom rugiB is 
also a valuable sign, though the dilatation of the canal proves no- 
thing, since like every other canal it is easily dilated, and becomes 
very considerably so, merely by long-continued, though fruitless, 
carnal intercourse ; the rugae in its walls are, however, not usually 
restored when once they have been efl&iced by an ordinary delivery : 
abortions, however, and youth and firmness of the maternal body, 
may lessen the probative value of this sign. 4. The dark colour of 
the areola round the nipplet, which is already developed during (the 
first) pr^nancy (§ 27, p. 858 Vol. III.) never entirely disappears, 
whflst other discolorations of the skin — such as liver-spots, the dark 
central line of the abdomen, &c., may certainly vanish. For this 
reason the dark colour of the areolae is always an important sign, and 
if it, as I must assert, is never absent during life after only one soli- 
tary confinement, and therefore certainly is just as unable as the 
other signs following to prove a certain delivery subsequent to pre- 
vious ones, then if the colour of the areolae be not dirty brownish-red, 
but the light rosy-red of the virgin, it is a positive proof that the 
delivery suspected has never tf^en place. 5. Precisely the same 
may be said in r^ard to the freckle-like cicatrices in the abdominal 
coverings which are chiefly to be seen in the inguinal regions, and 
have been already referred to (§ 27, p. 854, Vol. III.), and which 
never completely disappear after (the first) delivery. They are often 
so few in number as to be easily counted ; at others their rows cover 
the whole of the lower part of the abdomen, and they are remarkably 
visible even upon recent bodies. Many years ago, I made very nume- 
rous investigations in regard to this symptom on the syphilitic females 
of our Charity Hospital, and I can testify that I have never once 
been wrong in deducing the fact of a delivery from the occurrence of 
even a few of these cicatrices, and the reverse when they were entirely 
absent, considering, of course, that these dissolute public whores had 
not the slightest interest in concealing the truth. I have also found 
this confirmed in my medico-legal practice. The objection to this 
symptom is, that the rupture of the rete Matpighii, which is the 
cause of these cicatrices, is produced by any great distention of the 
abdominal coverings such as may occur from other tumours of the 
belly, such as hydrovariura, extensive ascites, &c. But the larger 
proportion of females who are the subjects of medico-legal examina- 
tion on account of disputed delivery are young women, who are as 



§ 37. PERSISTENT SIGNS. 389 

such not generally subject to these and similar diseases; and even in 
the case of elderly females, we must never forget that ovarian dropsies, 
extensive tumour of the spleen or liver, or similar diseases which 
produce great distention of the abdomen, are seldom or never so 
completely cured as to permit of so great a relaxation of the abdominal 
coverings as is usually the case after the extrusion of a foetus. Prom 
a practical point of view, therefore, this objection is of no value ; and 
this continues to be one of the most excellent signs of delivery, being 
only absent in those cases in which abortion has taken place during 
the early months of a first pregnancy before the abdominal coverings 
have been distended to any considerable degree. 6. All that has 
been just said might be repeated in regard to the folds and wrmMes 
of the abdominal coverings, which are certainly only the result of their 
previous distention during pregnancy, and subsequent relaxation after 
delivery. But I must also add that I have frequently observed an abdo* 
men smooth and free from wrinkles even when a birth has indubitably 
taken place, particularly after abortions and premature births, and even 
after deliveries at the full time in young, fat, and firm subjects; and 
vice versd, it is well known that the disappearance of the subcutane- 
ous fat in advanced age may be the cause of wrinkles on the abdo- 
men just as well as on other parts of the body, and I have observed 
them to be very remarkable on the bodies of virgins aged sixty or 
seventy. This sign is, therefore, subordinate in value to the pre- 
vious one. 7 and 8. The alteration during pregnancy of the trans- 
verse virgin form of the os uteri into a circular sha^e (§ 27, p. 852, 
Vol. III.) continues, subsequent to the retrogressive changes in the 
uterus after delivery, throughout the whole life ; and I have had 
occasion to observe it most plainly on uteri removed from the bodies 
of very many old women who could not have given birth to a child 
for many years ; and, on the other hand, I have always, and without 
exception, found this symptom present whenever any other sign dis- 
tinctive of delivery, such as abdommal cicatrices, &c., were present. 
As, however, obstetricians assert that pathological conditions of the 
uterus may cause the os uteri to assume this circular form, and as 
I myself must confess that even a finger accustomed to such explora- 
tions might make a mistake during the life of the individual, there- 
fore, as already remarked {loc. cit) too decisive an estimate must 
not be placed upon this sign, though we must never omit its exami- 
nation. We may, however, certainly conclude that a large body has 
forced its way through the os uteri, when we find one or more 



^ 



S90 I 37. PERSISTENT SIGNS. 

taeerationB {indenktHom) of Us lips, which also never completely 
disappear after the first confinement. These^ however^ do not neces- 
sarily occur after abortions^ and they are all the mmre likelj to be 
absent the earlier the abortion took place. 

Consequently, in accordance with these obsenrational facts^ it is 
by no means ^hfficult to determine medioo-legaUy, whether a woman 
ias ever been delivered or no ; but it is more difficult to ascertain 
wAen she was probably delivered; and this can only be done within 
the first few weeks of the actual deliyeiy; while it is quite impos- 
sible to determine how often $Ae has been delivered. Therefc»^, it 
is also, in particular, quite impossible to determine with any certaintf 
whether a woman who confessedly and notoriously has given birth 
to a child some years previously, has also more recently ' — some 
months ago, or longer — ^been again deKvered. Precisely such cases 
as these are, however, of frequent occurrence in practice, and the 
medical jurist can then only substantiate his reasons for giving a 
n^ative opinion."^ 

* I cannot omit giving as a warnings a short aoooont of the following; 
horrible case, which, in the year 1810, gave occasion to a superarbitrimn of 
the Royal Scientific Commission {itide Hitzig's Zeitschrift fiir d. Crim.- 
BeohtspAege X. s. 233, &e.). Louisa S. was condemned to ei^t years' penal 
serntude £w pleading guilty to the intentional murder of her newborn child. 
During her precognition for a robbery she had declared herself pregnant, 
and was handed over to a Maternity HospitaL After examii^ation by a mid- 
wife. Dr. X. granted a certificate (!) tiiat she was seven months* pregnant 
A fsw months subsequently she secretly left the Maternity, and was after- 
wards recommitted to prison. In the course of her examination, upon 
recommitital, she declared that on the third night after leaving the Maternity 
she had been delivered of a child on a stair, that in despair she had stabbed 
it to the heart, and had buried it in a spo;t which she minutely described. 
The body could not be fbund there. There was no trace on the stair of any 
delivery tiaving taken place there. Dr. X. and the midwife also judicially 
deposed, t^t from the condition of her genitals she must have been de- 
liv««d several months previously. Her alleged seducer also deposed that 
he had impregnated her three timet^ and 'that on the night of the alleged 
infanticide she had told him that her confinement was close at hand, and 
that she had violent pains in her abdomen. At her first judicial examina- 
tion she fell into a deep swoon, and in accents of despair called out^ ** I 
must get back my poor child," &c. She was condemned to eight years' penal 
servitude. After having completed two years and nine months of this 
punishment, she came forward with the declaration that she was perfectly 
innocent, inasmuch as she had never given birth to a child at all. When 
Dr. X. was examined as to his opinion, he declared '* that he Had probably 
never examined the accused at that time, and that he had only reported in 



§ 38. ABORTION. 391 

§ 38. Intentional Demveey ; Aboetion. 

Statutory Eegulations. 

Pbnal Code, § 181. Any pregnant woman whoy by the emplGy- 
ment of external or intemal mean^, intentionally camseB herfmtMS to 
abort, or kills it while within her womb, is to be punished by penal 
sermtnde of from five, to twenty years. Whosoever shall employ or 
administer such means, with consent cf the pregnant woman, shall be 
liable to the same punishment, 

§ 182. Whmoever shall, without the eonsetd of the pregnxmt 
woman, intenlionally Mil her foetus, or cause her to abort, is to be 
punished with penal servitude for from f^oe to twenty years. Should 
the Ufe of the pregna/nt woman be sacrificed by this procedure, the 
punishment is then to be penal servitude for Ufe. 

Among the many cases I have had c^cially to investigate on accotmt 
of an accusation of provocatio aiortus, I have seldom seen one where 
the circitmstantial evidence made the guilt of the accused more 
clear, or where the judgment given was so peculiw as in the case 
related in § 76 (p, 6, Vol. III.), in which the Seducer, a physician, 
had employed, lege artis, two methods of producing artificial abortion, 
and with the desired result. In that case, the ground for the acquittal 
was to be found in the absence of any actual object which could 
prove that the ovum expelled was a '' child/^ saai not perhaps only a 
'' m<de,^^ a doubt which may be made use by defenders on other occa- 

aeoordanoe with the statements of tiie midwife*' (! I). The midwife was 
dead. The district physician M. and Professor B. examined the woman 
now, and certified ** that this woman has never heen delivered of a child.*' 
The opinion of the Snperior Medieal Board refsrred to was now requested. 
On examining ^e accused they found ** Fonrchette entire, narrow, elastic, 
and rugose vagina, the os nteri high up, with a virgin transverse fissure; 
abdomen and breasts without a trace of those linear cicatrices or streaks 
which are found, almost without exception, after every complete delivery ;" 
and tiieir opinion was, " that it was in the highest degree probahle, and 
might almost be considered certain tiiat S. had fievet* given birth to a child 
of any size, such as- we find in tiie second half of pregnancy," and declared 
this case to be more capable of a decided opinion than most of these cases 
(in regard to this the expression almoat certain is remarkable). The 
accused was therefore only ab instantia, and not folly acqnitted. Yet, from 
the inconsiderate statements of unconscientious and unscientific medical 
men, she had been for almost three years confined in jail ! ! 



892 I 38. ABORTION. 

sionfl ; becaose^ if the medical jurist has not seen the ovum allied to 
have been expelled — and he is seldom if ever so fortunate — ^he can 
never say with certainty, or even probability, whether it has been a 
healthy foetus, a morbidOiy d^enerated ovum, or some other patho- 
logical product which has been thrown off. In such cases, the 
physician and the Judge have before them a mother without a foetus : 
and still more frequently, they have the reverse, a foetus without a 
mother ! Aborted foetuses are continually brought before us, which 
have been found in cesspools, privies, &c. In general there is no 
doubt as to their normal human form, because the normal form is 
the rule; but the source of the foetus is generally unknown, and 
remains so, and to the question usually put by the Judge, Whether it 
can be ascertained /tom the condition of the f(Btu9, that it has been 
intentionally expelled or no P a negative answer has constantly had 
to be given, since not a single case has come before us, in which 
injuries on the body, or particularly on the head of the foetus might 
have raised doubts as to this, though indeed such injuries are 
almost never found even when the abortion has been mechanically 
produced. The subject of disputed abortion also presents otiier 
difficulties from other points of view. It is also indubitable, and 
is also generally known, that certain medicaments acting in a 
variety of physiological ways may separate the foetus from the 
mother, and cause it to be expelled. I consider it quite improper to 
enumerate these medicaments, and point out which of them are 
the most effectual, as is usually done in works on forensic medicine, 
since the work may fall into other than merely professional hands, 
and they, moreover, are and must be completely instructed in these 
matters from their knowledge of materia medica and obstetrics. In 
like manner also every physician knows how uncertain all these so- 
called dbortiva are in their action, and that there is not one single 
internal medicament, of which it can be consistently with experience 
asserted, that even where an abortion has followed its use, it must 
have produced this abortion, and that cause and effect are in such 
a case in direct and necessary comiection. In large towns, such as 
Berlin, which have a lai^e population of the lowest classes of both 
sexes, numerous attempts at abortion are daily made, as every one 
knows fall well, by women during the first few months of their 
pregnancy, which are precisely those best suited for the success of 
such attempts, and yet for the most part they are without result.* 
* Fortunately, however, I cannot say of Berlin what Tardieu says of 



§ 38. ABORTION. 393 

The new Penal Code, however, facilitates in so far the determination 
of the deed, that definite categories are no longer laid down, but each 
case has to be decided on its own merits, and there is also no men- 
tion made of any means which must necessarily produce abortion. 
In the penal codes of Bavaria, Oldenburg, Wiirtemberg, Hannover, 
and Baden, there is nothing spoken of except means " which can pro- 
duce the expulsion of a foetus,'' whilst the Prussian Penal Code, and 
that of all the other German States, except those mentioned, keep only 
in view the fact of the foetus having been expelled, from which it, how- 
ever, follows logically, that the necessary connection between the 
cause and effect does not require to be proved. Wherefore, it 
indubitably follows in analogy with the regulations as to poisons in 
§ 197,''*' that since the appearance of the new Penal Code, we are 
asked in all cases that may happen to occur, whether the means em- 
ployed have been such as were fitted to cause a pregnant woman to 
abort ? In regard to this, in most cases we are enabled to give a 
perfectly decided affirmative or negative answer. The latter is very 
frequently the case, for it is incredible to what singular and absurd 
substances and mixtures the prejudice, credulity, imperfect know- 
ledge, and ignorance of the lower classes, have given the repute of 
active abortives. A girl, far-advanced in pregnancy, had long en- 
deavoured to procure — half-an-ounce of spirit of rosemary, which 
with a free and unembarrassed conscience she might at once have 
procured from any apothecary; having at length obtained it, she 
drank it, of course without any result, and then drowned herself, still 
undelivered. Green soap, which, from its relative frequent occurrence, 
seems to enjoy a special repute, comes before us in the most extra- 
ordinary forms, for instance as a bolus, or dissolved in liquorice 
juice, or in warm beer. In two cases the Thuja orientalis was em- 
ployed, unquestionably in a mistake for Savine, &c., &c. All these 
means must of course be declared to be not suited to produce the 
end desired. Even where means have been employed, which in 
themselves are certainly suited for the purpose, attention must 
nevertheless, be paid to the dose employed, the form of administra- 
Paris, that in it " le crime d'avortement conatitm une Industrie Ubre autant 
que coupable. C^est Id une vSritS tellement reconnue, que Von dSstgne publi- 
quement des maisons oit lea femmea sont assurSes de trouver lafuneste com- 
plidU qu'elles rSelamentj etdont la notortSti est repanduejusqu'd VHranger /" 
Annales d'Hygi^ne, publ. n. v. 1856, p. 125. 

* " Whoever intentionally administers to another poison, or any other 
substance which is fitted to injure the health, is to be punished," &c., &c. 



394 § 39. ABORTION. 

tioD^ and the time subseqaent to the use of the drug within which the 
abortion has followed. As in everj case it is the dose consistent 
with experience which constitutes the active medicament^ and as one 
grain of Camomile cannot be r^arded in this sense as Camomile at all, 
so neither can one grain of Savine or one-eighth of a grain of Ergot 
be reckoned as abortives. That the form in which the drug is 
administered may be also of considerable importance^ is very well 
shown by a very interesting case which was sent for my decision by 
a foreign jury coart. The accosed had (as is certainly usual) repeatedly 
drank a decoction of Savine. The box with the rest of the herb was found 
upon the table of the eorpvs delicti, and was sent to me. It was also 
proved, that the herb at the time of its use was already in the same 
condition in which I found it, that is, quite dried up, almost com- 
pletely fallen to powder, utterly devoid of smell even on being 
rubbed, and therefore completely deprived of its active principle. I 
had of course to declare that Savine such as this was quite unfitted 
-to produce abortion. So also we must consider the time vrithin 
which the abortion has followed the employment of the means. For 
even though the foetus may be retained within the uterus ftw some 
time after its death, yet we cannot err in declaring, that an abortion 
which has happened many weeks or months post hoc, has not occur- 
red propter hoc. But there is also this uncertainty in regard to the 
medico-legal opinion of the efficacy of internal abortives, that it 
cannot be denied, that according to all experience, ev^i the most 
powerfol and efficacious of them all generally fail of their end, and 
even after their administration the woman remains pregnant as be- 
fore. Forensic medicine has nothing to do with the fact that the 
Judge may, nevertheless, turn to good account from his point of view, 
the declaration that the medicament is '' suitable " for the purpose of 
producing abortion. 

§ 39. CONTINTJATION. 

The external means and methods employed for the production 
of abortion must, in fact, be estimated by the physician in foro, 
somewhat similarly as the internal, with the exception of the various 
scientific methods of producing premature labour artificially, which 
are taught in obstetrical handbooks, and are, indeed, perfectly cer- 
tain in their action, but which are not popularly known, and which 
can neither be employed by the pregnant woman herself, nor by 



§ 39. ABORTION. 395 

any non-medical accomplice^ either with or without her knowledge 
or desire (Penal Code). Amongst the other external means and 
methods, we must reckon venesection, a great variety of liniments 
(of which I have seen the most absurd examples), and particularly 
all acts of violence committed on the body of the pregnant woman, 
from tight-lacing, to kicks on the abdomen, &c., blows, violence in- 
flicted on the back and sacral region, &c. It cannot be disputed 
that all these influences may bring a pregnancy to a premature con- 
clusion, consequently that they are ^' suited '' to produce abortion ; 
but it is still more certain that the greatest violence neither is nor must 
by any means always be followed by this result, and that the preg- 
nant woman is mcwre often injured by them than her foetus. A 
woman, who, together with her seducer, a journeyman tailor, had 
agreed to attempt to produce aborti<wi, permitted herself to be 
trampled on by him without any result, and the natural idea " of 
cutting the child's thread of life,'' which the man attempted to carry 
out by introducing his thick and large tailor's scissors into the 
vagina, w^ also followed by no other result than merely to produce 
a wound in the vagina ! I may here mention that in accordance 
with several cases which have come before me, the question as to 
the possibility of producing abortion by inflicting violence on a 
pregnant woman may also occur judicially under perfectly different 
circumstances from those referred to. I mean in those frequent in- 
stances ui which women lay an accusation against a third party, that 
they have aborted; in consequence of violence or other injuries in- 
flicted by him, such as blows on the back, being thrown downstairs, 
&c., these cases come under the head of severe or important bodily in- 
juries {Fide § 43, &c., and Case CV.). In these cases the principles 
already laid' down are also appUcable, but we must remember in 
regard to them, as also in regard to accusations oiprovocatio ahorius, 
which are also brought forward without any foundation, that appear- 
ances on the body, which are alleged to be the results of violence, 
such as wounds, ecchymoses, scratches and the like, may be artifi- 
ciaUy and intentionally produced, in order to make the accusation 
appear credible. 

There are, therefore, various external and internal means known 
to, and employed by, non-medical persons, which, when used upon a 
pregnant woman, may bring her pregnancy to a violent and prema- 
ture conclusion. But though their employment be actually proved, 
it cannot from that be concluded the abortus in any given case has 



396 I 30. ABORTION. 

been the necessary result of the cause referred to. This, however, 
is a needless stretch of scepticism, since experience teaches us that 
abortion not onlj happens unintentionally and without any interfe- 
rence to that end, either by the pregnant woman or a third party, 
but even in happy marriages, in spite of the greatest care to prevent 
it, and also that these involuntary abortions are of much more fre- 
quent occurrence than those which are voluntary and punishable. 
General diseases in the pregnant woman, great irritability, weakness, 
a predisposition to abortion, which makes many marriages childless, 
depressing emotions of every kind, abuse of spirituous liquors, ex- 
cessive sexual intercourse, haemorrhages, hyperemia of the uterus, 
diseases of the foetus and placenta, &c., are all well-known and fre- 
quent causes of unintentional premature delivery. But we must not 
forget in any doubtful judicial case that most of these causes of 
morbid involuntary abortion are incapable of medicO'legal proof ^ and 
a fresh difficulty thus is presented in deciding any given case. 

The chief and preliminary inquiry is attended with no less, and 
often with the greatest difficulty, and with its consideration we 
must always commence, because, if a negative answer be given to 
it the whole case falls to nothing. I refer to the question whether an 
abortion has actually taken place or no P The difficulties in the way 
of answering this question are much more considerable than those in 
regard to a delivery in the later months of pregnancy (§§ 86, 87), 
and they are all the more so that a woman who has secretly aborted 
can much more easily conceal her delivery for a long time, than one 
who is delivered at a later period of pregnancy, because her pregnant 
condition previous to the abortion is more easily concealed, con- 
sequently the investigation by the forensic physician in general must 
be, and is much longer in being carried out, and happens therefore 
at a time in which the transitory signs of delivery (§ 86) have long 
since disappeared, whilst the persistent signs (§ 37) are, as abeady 
said, much more faintly impressed on the body after an abortion, 
indeed, some of them, such as indentations in the os uteri, and lacer- 
ation of the fourchette, may be entirely absent. And if the party 
concerned has been previously delivered, and if the examination has 
been carried out weeks or months after the alleged abortion 
so that not one of the transitory signs can be any longer 
observed — a most frequent occurrence inforo — then the forensic phy- 
sician is no longer in a position to decide the case with certainty, or 
even sometimes with probability. The positive determination of a 



§ 40. SUPPOSITITIOUS CHILDREN. 397 

disputed intentional abortion is therefore one of the most difBcult 
tasks of the forensic practitioner; the negative determination of such 
cases is less so, that is, however, only in regard to persons who have 
never been pregnant, and who only (after the infliction of violence, 
&c.), simulate an abortion, or who have been falsely charged with 
having aborted. 



§ 40. Of the Substitution of Children. 
Statutory Eegulations. {Videip. 381). 

This deceit, which the Penal Code threatens with a degrading 
imprisonment for many years, is but of rare occurrence in ordinary 
life; not, as is usually said, because the interests at stake are not of 
so much importance as where an heir to a property or to the throne 
is substituted, since his own interests seem to each individual quite 
as important as these, but because the deceit is very difScult to set a- 
going and to carry out, and because it requires the assistance of 
cognizants and accomplices, unless, indeed, the child be stolen, as 
in a case in Klein^s Annals of the Law. In this case, a peasant 
woman vrished to force a marriage ; she made the man drunk, in- 
duced him to have intercourse with her, feigned pregnancy, and 
finally set fire to a house in which a neighbour had been delivered of 
twins, stole one of these children, and produced it as a child of 
which she had been delivered ! In other cases the extortion of 
money from the alleged seducer and father, more rarely, the afifect- 
ing wish of a childless wife to gladden her spouse by making him a 
father (this was the cause of the last case of the kind which came 
before me), finally, in most cases, the desire to obtain an inheritance 
of some kind or other is the moving cause of a fraud of this nature. 
The writers on this subject have been also guilty of introducing in 
regard to it, ideas foreign to forensic medicine, when they continually 
speak of the ^'genuineness,^' of the "legitimacy,'' and of the 
''power to inherit" of the child, — ideas which belong to the statute- 
book and the science of law, and with which forensic medicine has 
nothing to do. The latter has only to consider the criteria accord- 
ing to which it may be actually determined in any given disputed 
case, whether tAis woman has given birth to this child, as she asserts 
she has, whilst the opposing party declares she has not, and that the 
child is supposititious. More rarely, the case of substitution is, as 



398 I 40. SUPPOSITITIOUS CHILDREN. 

it weie^ relative ; that is, the fact dispated is not whether the woman 
has been delivered or not of the child in question^ as, whether this 
child has been b^otten by this man, who asserts that the child is 
supposititious, as far as he is concerned* Both cases coincicb in 
r^ard to the medico-legal examination. In the first place, it is 
necessary to determine whether the alleged mother has ever given 
birth to a child at all. The signs of delivery (§§ 36, 87) will 
decide this point. If it shoold be discovered that she has never 
given birth to any child, then the fraud is at once proved. The 
case is more difficult where she has produced a child, but perhaps 
one of an undesired sex, such as a daughter where a male descendant 
was required ; or, when, instead of a living child, which alone coidd 
serve her purpose, a dead )ne has been bom. In order to ascertain the 
truth in these cases, where possible, the age of the child said to have 
been bom must be ascertained and compared with the alleged period 
of delivery. A fraud might thus be possibly easily detected, such aai, 
for instance, when a child alleged to be three days old, is exhibited 
with a completely formed navel. Has, however, the alleged mother, 
who has actually produced, had the cunning to substitute a child of 
the same age with her own, — then the medical jurist will in gen^*al 
have to declare the impossibility of his being able to give a decisive 
opinion. Because the resemblance of the child to its putative father, 
which we are advised to pay attention to, is a most uncertain mode 
of proof, particularly in the case of newborn or very young <^dren. 
In such children, especially in newborn ones, the resemblance in 
features to parents or relatives is, in most cases, not yet developed ; 
moreover, the power of discovering a likeness is something quite in- 
dividual, and, finally, it is well known that it is no law of nature 
that children must resemble their father or their mother, and that 
many exceptions occur to this. Yet it is but a few years since a sin- 
gular case came before me officially, in which this criterion was of itself 
sufficient, it was a case of what I have termed relative substitution, 
in the which the resemblance was based upon the difference of race. 
A white womim had a liaison with a negro of this city, and had a 
son by him aged fonr years, who exhibited all the peculiarities of a 
true mulatto. The woman, however, produced a second boy, the 
paternity of which the negro denied, as he suspected the woman of 
having had intercourse with a (white) labourer. The second child, 
eleven months old at the time of my examination, was, however, 
also a completely developed mulatto, and could not, therefore, have 



S 40. SUPPOSITITIOUS CHILDREN. 399 

been begotten by a white man out of its white mother ! In this 
case, therefore, the absence of fraud was indubitable. It is some- 
what remarkable, that a precisely similar case had occurred in Ber- 
lin in the year 1790. It gave occasion to a report by the superior 
Medical College, which gave itself the trouble of proving, by many 
quotations, " that a white child born by a white mother could not 
have been begotten by a black man.'' * Eemert goes still further 
than the mere difference of race, for he points out that certain con- 
genital family pecuharities descend for generations ; and of this he 
gives illustrations, such as a crooked little finger on each hand, red 
hair, stuttering, absense of the same finger-joints, and bUndness ; and 
modem physiological experience might very much enlarge this Hst. 
Remer asserts, that when such peculiarities are observed upon a child 
said to be supposititious, that then its '^ genuineness '' is certain ; 
but, however, where these are absent, the reverse is not to be con- 
cluded with certainty, but suspicion is justified. This assertion is 
tenable enough when the malformation or peculiarity in question is 
remarkable and indubitable, and is also of rare occurrence, but it 
must not be made to include ^^ fed hair,'' or " stuttering,'' and the 
like, which from their frequency might occur by chance, nor even a 
mole, &c., which might lead to mistakes; just because, however, 
such cases are of extremely rare occurrence as judicial ones, so there- 
fore this criterion, taken from the resemblance of the child, is almost 
worthless for medico-legal practice. Just because, on the whole, 
frauds perpetrated by the substitution of children are in a medico- 
legal point of view always difiBlcult, and under many circumstances im- 
possible to detect, while their results are of the highest importance 
to families, morality, ay, even to pubUc weal ; therefore families and 
nations have, from olden times, prescribed by statute certain precau- 
tions for the prevention of these frauds. In ancient dynasties, as in 
the Bourbons, the birth of a new member and possible heir to a 
throne is attended by solemn statutory forms, which have for their 
object and intention that the whole act of delivery should proceed 
before trustworthy witnesses, the highest officials of the crown and 
. state, &c., which is certainly the sole method of attaining perfect cer- 
tainty. In all statute-books similar regulations are contained. These 
commence to take action in the respective cases even during preg- 

• Pyl, Aufsatze u. Beob. VII. 8. 262. 
t Metzger's System, 5 Aufl. s. 367, note. 



400 I 41. INJURIES DURING DELIVERY. 

nancy, which is submitted to a continuoas control, &c., — ^but forensic 
medicine does not require to enter farther upon this subject. 

It has also been imagined that in a case of twins the second-bom 
child might be preferr^, and, as it were, substituted for the first- 
bom,* and endeavours have been made to ascertain how a substitu- 
tion of this character could be found out ! I am of opinion, that all 
such medico-legal subtilties come under the same category with the 
similar obsolete question, whether children begotten during the full 
moon are more viable than those conceived during the new moon? 
For the answer to which I may refer to Paulus Zacchias. 

§ 41. Injuries to the Mothee and Child dubing Deltveky. 

The question whether injuries may occur to the mother or child 
during, and to the latter immediately after, delivery, without any 
blame being attachable to the mother, the accoucheur or any other 
person, is one of frequent occurrence in medico-legal practice, and is 
closely connected with the subject of delivery. I have already 
given full details of the injuries and forms of death which may 
happen to the child, accompanied with a copious collection of illus- 
trative cases in §§ 108-121 (pp. 109-171, Vol. III.), and to this I 
now b^ to refer. Among the injuries which may happen to the 
mother during the act of delivery, nipiv/re of the uterus is one which 
frequently comes in question, because it may indubitably be caused 
by coarse obstetrical procedure, by the awkward employment of 
instruments in attempts at producing abortion,t violent extraction of 
the placenta, attempts at turning with a firmly contracted uterus, 
&c., but may equally indubitably occur perfectly spontaneously, and 
in the hands of the most cautious and expert obstetrician. It may 
be caused by anormal attenuation of the uterine walls, which in one 
case that came before me were only three or four lines in thickness,} 
especially when this attenuation, or when fatty degeneration of the 
walls coincide with contraction of the pelvis, or with a transverse 
position of the foetus ; or by any other obstacle to deUvery in the 

* Vide^ among others, Miiller, Entwurf der geriohtL Arzneiwissenschaft 
nach joristichen («tc/), n. medicinisohen Grundsatzen. Frankf. 1796, I. 
8. 366. 

t Several such oases are to be found in the Annales d'Hygidne, publ. 1858, 
X. p. 156, &o. 

t Fiwfe Case CCCXXIX. p. 326, Vol. II. 



§ 41. INJURIES DURING DELIVERY. 401 

soft or the hard parts when the pains are violent, such as spasmodic 
stricture, or cicatrices, or morbid alterations of the os uteri, which 
prevent its normal dilatation, &c. The extreme rarity of such 
spontaneous ruptures of the uterus, which, for example, in the large 
Maternity Hospital at Paris only occurred eleven times out of fifty-nine 
thousand eight hundred and fifty-nine cases, during the twenty years 
from 1839 to 1858, must always cause special care to be exercised 
in giving an opinion in any case in which, from circumstances, the 
cause of the rupture is doubtful. This opinion must further be 
guided by the period of pregnancy at which the rupture has occurred 
— as it would be something more than suspicious if the rupture 
should have occurred long before the normal end of the pregnancy — 
as weU as by the state of health of the deceased, the nature of the 
labour, the pathologico-anatomical appearances and individual cir- 
cumstances of each particular case. Further, the following accidents 
may also occur quite spontaneously and unavoidably : — rupture of a 
varixy which may be followed by a rapidly fatal hsemorrhage, a similar 
hcmxyrrJiage from the ruptured uterine vessels ; laceration of the 
joerineum, with subsequent incontinence of the fseces ; rupture of the 
vagina, where it has been congenitally tight, or has been rendered so 
by cicatrices ; violent inversion of the uterus, ay^ even laceration of 
the pelvic ligaments.* ' 

The decision in any case in which blame is supposed to be attach- 
able, must, of course, be given in accordance with ihe particular 
circumstances of the case, and these, of course, are only to be ascer- 
tained by an accurate history of the labour, whenever and in so far 
as it is to be obtained, which is by no means always the case; and 
by the personal examination by the forensic physician of the party 
alleged to be injured, if still alive; or by the medico-legal dissection 
of her body. The general principles upon which the decision is to 
be based are precisely the same as those upon which we must 
proceed in regard to any other decision as to any other accusation 
of malapraxis against a medical man, and these have been already 
folly detailed in § 70, p. 303, Vol. II. 

* Vide, for a thorough medioo-legal explanation of these oases, Hohle, op. 
cit. pp. 774-791, 808. 



VOL. III. D D 



402 $ 42 ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 



§42. Illusteativb Cases. 
Cask CI. — TTxa the Woman, Z., been deuvbeed rnre on six 

MONTHS AGO? 

She was accused (under the former statute) of having been secretly 
delivered in January or February, and when the investigation was 
commenced, in June, she denied having been delivered for a whole 
year. At the examination I found her to be a woman aged forty- 
seven, who, during five-and-twenty years of married hfe, had given 
birth to nineteen children, all mature, and besides these she had also 
nursed several foster children. And now I was required to determine 
the birth of a twentieth child, alleged to have been bom half-a-year 
previously I The woman, Z., came before me, firmly denying all this, 
and asserting that she had given birth to her last-bom child two years 
and four months previously, an assertion which, of course, could be 
of no assistance. Her breasts were flabby and withered, the areola very 
dark, the nipples looked as if they had been used in nursing. The 
abdominal coverings were extraordinarily withered and wrinkled, but 
exhibited but few cicatrices. The vagina was relaxed and dilated ; 
there was no discharge, no lochia ; the uteras was elevated, its os 
was firm, hard, circular, and permitted the passage of the point of 
the index-finger, having at its right side two indentations. The 
fourchette was completely absent. Accordingly, we could only 
determine that the woman Z. had repeatedly given birth to children, 
and that from the absence of turgescence or milk in the breasts, of 
the lochia, whether sanguinolent or mucous, and of any considerable 
dilatation of the os uteri, it was certain that she had not been 
delivered for some weeks. Whether, however, she had not been 
deUveredfive or six months ago ? could not be determined, even with 
probability, from the appearances observed and in the circumstances 
of the case. 

Case CII. — How old was the Fcetus born three weeks ago ? 

In the case of the unmarried woman, L., the question in dispute 
was not so much the delivery itself, as the period at which the 
pregnancy had been interrupted. This person had also previously 
been delivered. On the twenty-third of September I still found in 



§ 42. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 403 

the breasts a considerable quantity of tolerably rich and very white 
nailk, which of itself, as I explained, was very much against the pro- 
bability of L/s assertion that she had only been three or four 
months pregnant. ^'The abdomen was copiously beset with those 
folds and streaks which are the result of the birth of a mature child ; 
but this, however, is of no importance in this inquiry, since it is 
certain that L. has, at any rate, already produced one child at the full 
time. There is still a slight trace of the lochia present, but this 
proves nothing in regard to the age of the child just bom. On the 
other hand, the os uteri is still, three weeks after the confinement, 
dilated to the size of a fourpenny-piece, and there are a few lacerations 
on it. Such an amount of dilatation, however, does not bespeak 
the delivery of any very small (young) foetus, but rather- of one of 
some considerable size, that is, age.'' In accordance with all these 
appearances, I declared that " the foetus, of which L. had been de- 
livered three or four weeks ago, was most probably older than four 
months.'' 

Case CIII. — ^Disputed Aboetion. 

C, a stout woman of six-and-twenty, had already been delivered, 
in April 1854, of an eight-months' child, which she had nursed a 
whole year. Since the sixth or sixteenth of August, 1856, she was 
said to have been again pregnant, and to have made use of savine 
and spirits of rosemary as abortives. On the twenty-fourth of 
November, that is, in the fourth month of the disputed pregnancy, I 
examined the woman, C, in prison, and found as follows : — ^the breasts 
were fiwn, with a dark areola, largely developed nipples, and no trace 
of milk. The abdomen in this stout woman was somewhat pro- 
tuberant, little distended, and had distinct deep wrinkles over the 
pubis. The menses were said to have twice ceased to recur, which, 
however, was alleged to have been ^' sometimes " the case with her 
previously. The vaginal mucous membrane was not reddened, the 
hymen and fourchette were destroyed, there was a slight fluor albus. 
Tlie entrance to the vagina was tolerably wide. The uterus was 
somewhat retroverted, therefore the vaginal portion was somewhat 
tilted up, but the finger could be easily passed round it. The os 
uteri was of a distinctly circular form without any indentations. She 
alleged that her health was perfectly good. She declared that she 
had not made any use of savine, and spirit of rosemary only in so far 

D d2 



404 I 42. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

thit she had plucked some of the fresh herb out of a flower-pot, 
upon which she had poured some com brandy^ and of this she had 
drunk a wine-glassful in the evening. The questions given to 
me, I answered thus: 1. It cannot with certainty be determined 
whether this (multiparous) person is still in the fourth month of 
pregnancy^ that this, however^ is not probable; 2. That she has 
been formerly delivered ; 3. That she has not been ddivered about 
fourteen days ago (shortly befc^re her imprisonment); 4. That 
savine under certain circumstances may be^ but that spirits of rose- 
mary cannot be regarded ^' as a medicament fitted to produce abor- 
tion.'^ The woman C. had not been pregnant at this time, for she 
came before me for examination on the nineteenth of Mareh^ 1856^ 
with this query, whether she was now pregnant, and in what month, 
or whether she had shortly before aborted or been ddivered ? I 
found precisely similar appearances to those just detailed, only now 
her shift was somewhat stained with blood, alleged to be &om her 
menses, which were said to have been recently present. Her abdomen 
was not more distended than formerly, and the auscultation revealed 
no signs ol pregnancy. Accordingly, Z must declare that the woman 
C. was now also probably not pregnant, but it was certain that she 
was not six or eight months gone with child^ and that she had not 
shortly befooe aborted or been deUvered. 

Casb civ. — ^Disputed Abortus after Ill-treatbibnt. 

At the time of the trials I had to examine a large, robust woman, 
twenty-eight years of age, who had been married for five months, 
who had accused the prisoner at the bar, her sister-in-law, of shaving, 
four months ago, thrown her down and abused her with blows of 
her fists, and by kneeling upon her belly when she was (for the first 
time) three months pregnant. She deposed that on the day after 
the assault she had rigors, violent pains in the sacrum and loins ; 
that for one day she had lost much blood, afterwards less had come 
away; she also stated that she had observed " skins ^' among the 
blood coagula. No medical man was consulted. I found a faint 
yellowish-brown areola round the nipples, which were not developed. 
There was no milk, no streaks or wrinkles upon the abdomen; no 
discharge; the hymen was destroyed, but the fourchette was still 
present, the vaginal portion of the uterus was low down, the os uteri 
was somewhat circular, without any laceration. Considering the 



§ 42. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 405 

case as a whole, the statements on oath of the injured party to the 
court, which, as we see, bore internal evidence of truth, and the 
results of my own examination, I had to declare that it was probable 
that an abortion had taken place. 

Case CV. — Blows with a besom-shank. — ^Aboetion. 

A fragile, feeble woman, aged twenty-seven, who had been four 
times happily delivered, and had never aborted, and who superintended 
her household alone, W£^s abused by blows on the arm, hand, and 
back, while she thought herself again two months pregnant. Just 
two hours after this ill-treatment, a metrorrhagia set in, and a mid- 
wife had certified that an abortion had actually resulted — but when ? 
could not be subsequently ascertained. The causal connection be- 
tween the abortion and the violent treatment could not, therefore, be 
denied, since there was neither an individual disposition to abortion, 
nor was there any other cause to which it could be attributed ; the 
hsemorrhage had almost immediately succeeded the beating, and the 
blows of a stick upon the back, combined with the emotional excite- 
ment necessarily concurrent, must, of course, be regarded as a very 
possible cause of an abortion in any woman two months pregnant. 
It was ascertained that the haemorrhage had lasted for about six 
weeks, and the woman was alleged to have been much weakened by 
it, which all medical experience rendered credible. At the time when 
I examined her she was perfectly restored. Besides the principles 
already referred to, we had to declare that '' a deprivation of the 
power of procreation could not be caused by this abortion'* (§ 193, 
Penal Code), but that it had occasioned '' a lengthened period of 
incapacity for work,'' an incapacity for exerting herself with her 
usual amount of activity, and that, accordingly, the injury must be 
declared to be ^'important" (§ 192 Penal Code). 

Case CVI. — Have any Attempts been made to produce Abor- 
tion Mechanically ? and has the Woman St. been seve- 

BAL times DEMVEBJED OR NO? 

Both of these queries had to remain unsolved. The woman St. 
was delivered on the 27th of April, 1841, of a living child, and was 
said " to have employed mechanical means to procure the expulsion 
of this child." ^en it was questionable whether she had been 



406 §42. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

pr^nant previous to this pregnancy, or subsequent to this confine- 
ment ? The case, the connection of which is unknown to me, was 
certainly not an easy one. My examination of the woman took place 
on the 22nd of December, 1842, twenty months after the birth in 
April. I reported as the result of my examination, that "the 
woman St. is twenty-five years of age, a very robust person, and 
seemingly in perfect health, who says that except during her preg- 
nancy, which ended on the 27th of April, 1841, that is to say, hefm 
this period, as well as after it, her menses have always been perfectly 
regular, and that four months ago she suffered from an inflamma- 
tion of the lungs. There are no corporeal signs by which the truth 
of this statement as to her menses could be ascertained, and I must 
therefore leave this undetermined. The abdominal coverings of St. 
are relaxed and full of folds, as is always the case in women after a 
confinement. It is not, however, to be denied that a relaxation so 
considerable as is present in this case, does not usually occur in a 
woman so robust and firm as she is, as the result of merely one singU 
confnement. Yet this phenomenon does not permit us to conclude 
even with probability, that St. has had only one or several confine- 
ments, since it is one which varies too much with each individual, 
and depends in particular upon the greater or less amount of care 
taken of her abdomen by the woman during her pr^nancy and after 
her confinement, by long-continued inunction with strengtbemng 
and aromatic substances, &c., which we cannot enter upon here. 
Besides this wrinkled condition, the abdomen of St. also displayed 
those dcatrix-like streaks which are also found to be persistent after 
but one confinement, and from these, therefore, no conclusions can 
be drawn in regard to the question, ad 2. No traces of external 
violence were found upon the body of the woman examined. In 
estimating these negative appearances (and in answer to the question 
€ul\), 1 must, however, remark, that it may be certainly concluded 
from them, that no solutions of continuity (wounds) could formerly 
have existed on the body of the woman examined, particularly on the 
lower part of her abdomen or back, because otherwise their cicatrices 
must have been still discoverable. Whether, however, there may 
not have perhaps been some time mere ecchymo^es, the results of 
blows of the fist, kicks, ligatures, fee, the result, in short, of 
' mechanical attempts to procure the expulsion of a child,' upon the 
body of St., must remain undetermined, from the present negative 
condition of the appearances found, since even ecchymoses of con- 



§ 42. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 407 

siderable size completely disappear after a time by the absorption of 
the effused blood. The areola round the nipples was of the dirty 
brownish-red colour usual after even a single confinement; the 
breasts were firm and compact. In regard to the condition of the 
genital organs^ there is^ in the first place^ nothing unusual to be 
observed about the vagina, except a Uttle fluor albus, which is of no 
consequence for the present inquiry ; which is also the case in regard 
to a few conical condylomata, found in the region of the vagina and 
the anus, and a few hemorrhoidal tumours in the ne^hbourhood of 
the latter. The vaginal portion of the uterus is tolerably elevated, 
the OS uteri externum harder than usual at this time of life, it is also 
circular in shape, a form which is, found after one just as well as 
after several dehveries. I have also found one laceration on its pos- 
terior lip, which is a further proof that St. must have been delivered, 
and also with some degree of jprobability intimates that she haS not 
given birth to more at least than one child at the full time, because 
several lacerations are usually found after repeated dehveries. The 
number of lacerations, however, has no necessary or definite relation 
to the number of confinements, and in particular after the expulsion 
of immature foetuses, frequently no lacerations are observed at all, 
because in such cases the os uteri is not usually so widely and for- 
cibly dilated. Finally, the vagina of St. is not immoderately dilated, 
and there is no laceration of her perinseum, phenomena which are 
both of no consequence in relation to the present inquiry. Accord- 
ingly I must answer the questions put to me as follows : — ad 1, that 
it can no longer be ascertained whether this woman has suffered from 
the employment of mechanical means to procure the expulsion of a 
child; ad 2, that it is at least to be assumed with some degree of 
probability that the woman, St., has only been dehvered of one child 
at the full time, but it cannot be ascertained whether she has been 
pregnant previous to or since that pregnancy.'' 

Cases CVII. to CIX. — ^Thrbb Accusations against Physicians 
op having produced abortion criminally. 

I regret having to sully the pages of this work with three such 
horrible cases ; their instructive character, however, both requires 
and justifies their insertion. 

CVII. This case has been already cursorily referred to (at p. 391, 
Vol. III). The maid-servant E., aged twenty-one, whose menses had 



408 } 42. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

oeMed for two months, had felt herself unwell for several weeks be- 
fore Whitsuntide 18**, without suspecting that this could be the re- 
sult of her being impregnated by her master^ a physician and practical 
obstetrician. Dr. X. After she discovered this to be the case, her 
master, according to her statement, repeatedly '' passed a long instra- 
menf into her genitals, and also several times ^' pushed small thiee- 
comered pieces of sponge deep into them, which, after their removal, 
were always swollen up.'' On the second day of the Whitsuntide festi- 
val, she was seized with violent pains, and suddenly lost much blood 
along with '^ skin and husks '' (shreds of skin). Five months subse- 
quently she was brought to me for the first time for examination! 
*' The areola round the nipples,'' I reported, " is darker-coloured than 
is usually the case during virginity and previous to the first impr^na- 
tion. No milk can be expressed from the breasts. The left breast ex- 
hibits the cicatrices of sores, which are wholly irrevelant to the ques- 
tion in hand, since the suppuration in the breast did not occur till 
three months after the allied occurrence of the abortion. Ndther 
cicatrices nor stains are to be seen on the abdomen of this firm 
and robust woman. The genitals are deflowered. The vaginal por- 
tion of the uterus is tolerably elevated, and neither exhibits lacera- 
tions nor any other injuries. The os uteri is, however, not of the 
virgin transverse form and closed, but is of an elliptic shape, and 
can be entered by the point of the index finger. There is no dis- 
charge from the genitals, and the fourchette is not destroyed. The 
innate truth in the statement of the accused and its agreement with 
the appearances found, are in favour of the correctness of her accu- 
sation. What E. alleges to have been done is precisely what is done 
in obstetrics, whenever the preservation of the Ufe of the jpregaant 
woman requires that her pregnancy should be brought to a premature 
and enforced conclusion. This method of procedure is only known 
to experts, and can only be employed by them with any prospect of 
attaining the desired result, but when properly carried out it is cer- 
tainly the only sure method of bringing on an abortion or a prema- 
ture birth. Whether this method of producing abortion has been 
employed upon E. five months ago, is a matter not easily decided. 
After the lapse of so long a time, those signs which might have been 
expected to have been found shortly after an actual delivery, such as 
more or less milk in the breasts, more or less heat in the genitals, 
some discharge from them, and a considerable dilatation of the os uteri, 
have necessarily disappeared. Nevertheless the following remarkable 



§ 42. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 409 

appearances were found on E. : a dark areola, which indicates the pre- 
existence of pregnancy, and the aperture of the os uteri, which was not 
transverse but round and not completely closed, an appearance which 
does not indicate mere defloration or sexual intercourse, however often 
repeated, but which permits us to conclude that a delivery must have 
occurred. Considering all these facts, I must give it as my opinion that 
the appearances on the body of E. are in favour of the fact of her 
having had an abortion/' (I have already [p. 391, Vol. III.] related 
how and for what reason the accused has been acquitted !) 

CVni. — Some years ago a physician practising in Berlin, who 
was notoriously of bad repute, and has subsequently been outlawed, 
was accused of having given the Widow K. a prescription ^'for the 
purpose of expelling a foetus." The documentary evidence was put 
before me along with this query, " Whether the drug, if employed 
according to the manner stated orally by K., was fitted to produce 
the intended effect, and whether its use was attended by any consi- 
derable danger to the health of K. r^' After a careM and con- 
scientious examination of the documentary evidence, I stated in 
my report, "experience teaches us that there is no drug in the 
Materia Medica which produces its effects with such certainty upon 
the life of the foetus or upon the pregnant uterus ; that its employ- 
ment mmt of necessity, and under all circumstances, separate the 
foetus from the pregnant mother, that is to say, cause an abortion. 
In accordance with this undoubted principle, which has been based 
upon experience, the drugs prescribed by Dr. Y. cannot be declared 
to be of such a character either in themselves or in their admixture. 
Nevertheless there are drugs which act in so irritating a manner 
upon the above-mentioned and neighbouring parts as to produce the 
haemorrhage from the uterus, pains, &c., and which may thereby 
produce abortion, and often do so; and when such drugs have 
been actually employed it must at least be asserted of them that 
' they 2iXQ fitted to produce the effect intended.' And this is all the 
more true when these drugs have been administered in particularly 
large doses, and especially when a combination and union of similar 
medicaments in large doses has been employed. And this was pre- 
cisely the case in regard to the mixture of drugs prescribed by Dr. 
T. for the Widow K. According to the documentary evidence 
this consisted in a five-ounce infusion made from one ounce (imp.) 
of senna leaves, and of a five-ounce infusion of one ounce (imp.) 
of savine, to which ten ounces of water were to be added, one ounce 



410 I 42. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

and a-half of sjnip of saffiron^ and one ounce and a-half impure tar- 
trate of potass and borax {Tartarus boraxatwt), and of this mixture 
the Widow K. states that she was ordered to take one tablespoonful 
every two hours. The whole would amount to about twenty-six 
tablespoonfols^ and the woman^ K.^ would have required three whole 
days to make use of it. In the first place^ the doses of all the medica- 
ments must be r^^ded as relatively lai^. An infasion of one ounce 
of senna leaves in five ounces of fluid must of itself prove strongly 
laxative^ and that it had actuaUy had that effect in the woman^ K.^ is 
evident both from the statements of herself and B.^ although the 
Woman K. has not nearly taken the whole of the medicine. But 
strong pu^atives act upon the pregnant uterus partly sympathetically 
and partly mechanically (by the strong straining)^ and prudent physi- 
cians are therefore careful not to prescribe such remedies for pr^- 
nant women^ in order to avoid abortions^ particularly during the first 
months of pregnancy, when abortions are comparatively easUy caused, 
the very stage of pr^nancy at which the Widow K. was at that tjme. 
Savine has a stiU more directly excitant action upon the uterus ; for this 
reascm it possesses a popular repute as an abortive agent, and no phy- 
sician would prescribe it for any pregnant woman without some peculi^ 
reason (which can but rarely happen). This medicament has also 
be^ prescribed by Dr. Y. in this case in an unusual dose (one ounce 
to five ounces of infusion). Further, the preparations of borax in 
general belong to the. class of medicaments in question, though it 
cannot be denied that the one chosen in this case {Tartarus boraxatua) 
possesses less than the usual amount of this quaUty. It is, however, 
to say the least, very remarkable to find so large an amount (one 
ounce and a-half) of this substance added to a mixture such as that 
described. Finally, saffron has been regarded as a stimulating ex- 
citant of the circulation, consequentiy an agent in producing mis- 
carriage, but the prescription in question contains only the very 
mildest proration of this drug, namely, the syrup of saffon, which 
in itself would be perfectly harmless. In regard now to the actual 
effects of this mixture, all the symptoms related by K. in the docu- 
mentary evidence, such as violent cutting pains in the abdomen, 
violent diarrhoea, weakness in the legs, and therefore incapacity for 
work for a few days, are all to be ascribed to the action of the senna, 
and no other results have ensued, chiefly because the medicine was 
laid aside, after which the results mentioned being unimportant, of 
course speedily ceased. Though the Widow K. was thus in no 



§ 42. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 41 r 

actual danger, and though I will not bring forward the supposition 
that by a longer continuance of the mixture with increase of her 
purgation an inflammation of the bowels might possibly have arisen, 
yet it cannot be denied after what has been already said, that the use 
of the whole of the mixture might have been followed by the afore- 
mentioned expulsion of the foetus, and that under these circum- 
stances the general: health of the woman, K., would have been threat- 
ened, since an . abortion produced by violent means is very often a 
source of protracted and violent hsemorrhage, which exhausts the 
strengih for a long time. Accordingly I answered the aforementioned 
query as follows : that the said mixture was fMed to produce the end 
desired, and that by its use the health of the Widow K. might ^possibly 
have been placed in considerable danger/^ The matter did not end 
here. The accused protested against my opinion, and alleged as an 
objection to it that the Widow K. was disposed to abort; he, how- 
ever, requested that another medical man should report upon this 
matter. My deputy, whom I have never seen, either before or 
since, was now (ibjurged with the examination of the Widow K. He 
found, according to his report, which I possess, that she was forty- 
one years of 8^e, a robust, corpulent, perfectly healthy person who 
had never suffered from any disturbances of the circulation, had never 
been bled, and had got easily and well over all her confinements. 
Not a trace of debility or great irritability was to be found in her. 
Her menstruation was always regular and painless. She had given 
birth to i/u)elve matwre children, and besides she had abwted thrice, 
the first time in the sixth month of her pr^nancy the day after 
carrying a heavy chest; the second time was also mechanically 
brought about in the second month ; the third time was caused by 
violent emotional excitfement. Aftet the last abortion she had, how- 
ever, produced several other children at the full time. When locally 
examined, my deputy found that she had a moderate fluor albus> the 
genitals were nonaal, and the examination was not in the slightest 
degree painful. In accordance with all these circumstances, he 
reported very properly, " that the Widow K. had not a peculiar dis- 
position to abort.'M 

CIX. — ^The third case was something like the first, as may be seen 
from the query put before me, " Can the expulsion of a foetus be 
produced by the introduction of an iron wire, through a pewter 
syringe, into the genital organs during the fourth or subsequent 
months of pregnancy, whereby much blood was lost ? '^ By which 



412 $ 42. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

it was also required to consider^ ** in how fiur an abortion was thus 
probablj intended to be produced?'' The physician accused was 
the supposed seducer^ and was said to have introduced this instm- 
ment three times^ and each time to have occasioned the woman to 
lose '* some blood.'* This operation was, however, productive of 
no result either to the mother or the child, and did not prevent the 
birth of a mature and healthy child. The report, in the first place; 
detailed the causes of abortion, and then went on to say, '^ the artificial 
production of uterine pains may be caused by any violence acting 
through the genital organs upon the uterus, and therefore also by an 
iron wire, whether it be guided through a syringe or not ; the sole 
condition necessary being that the uterus itself be struck and 
irritated. Should, however, the vagina alone be struck, or even 
injured by the foreign body introduced, the uterine life then remains 
uninjured, and the pr^nancy runs its course undisturbed. Such 
must have been the case in this instance, and this is the reason why 
a threefold introduction of the said instrument, by which the pregnant 
woman lost only ' some blood,' indubitably from the woiuid in the 
vaginal waUs, has had no influence upon the foetus. Accordingly, I 
answered the first question thus : that the introduction of an iron 
wire (through a pewter syringe) into the genitals (&c., as above) 
may produce the expulsion of a foetus. In regard to the second 
query. In how far an abortion was thus probably intended to be pro- 
duced? I may remark, that no proceeding such as this is anywhere 
taught in obstetrics, either as a curative or diagnostic means. The 
operation for the production of premature labour cannot be advanced 
as an objection to this. It is not performed in the manner before 
mentioned, and is in itself nothing else than a scientifically produced 
premature expulsion of a foetus," &c. (here foUow the indications for 
this operation), ''which, &c., is performed in order to rescue and 
preserve the life of the mother, which would, by reason of disease or 
malformation, be endangered by the subsequent delivery at the 
natural period. In the case now in hand, of the woman N. N., 
who presented herself before me as a young, healthy, and perfectly 
well-formed woman, there could be no question of any intent to 
induce artificially a premature labour according to the rules of science. 
And therefore for all these reasons there is no other mode of 
answering this query left me but to say, that an abortion was probably 
intended to have been produced by the procedure mentioned." 



§ 42. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 413 

Case CX. — ^Black Soap with Pepper and Savine as Abortives. 

All these were used by the unmarried woman, K. The herb was 
recognised as Junvpema saUna, and the question, which was put 
thus, " Can savine produce the expulsion of a foetus ?'^ was answered 
aflftrmatively after giving the well-known reasons and Umitations. 
The second question was, ^'Whether black soap, boiled with much 
pepper, can also produce the expulsion of a foetus?^' Less notice 
was taken of the nauseous and stomach-turning qualities of the 
potash-soap than of the excitant action of the mixture mentioned, if 
taken in large doses ; and, in conclusion, it was said that this mix- 
ture might produce the expulsion of a foetus, but that both savine 
and black soap with pepper had in very many cases failed to produce 
this effect. 

Case CXI. — ^Black Soap with Plums, and Wort with Laurel 
Leaves, as Abortives. 

The unmarried woman, G., who was in the fourth month of her 
pregnancy, was imprisoned for attempting to produce abortion by 
the above-mentioned substances. She confessed once to have taken 
black soap with dried plums, but she had immediately vomited them. 
It was stated that a violent and continuous vomiting might possibly 
produce an abortion, but that this was not generally observed, and 
that hundreds of pregnant women vomited constantly without abort- 
ing. Black soap (the plutos were of no consequence) was more 
frequently employed in this city than other substances, yet not a 
single case is known to me in which this substance of itself has pro- 
duced an abortion. The same may be said of a decoction of laurel 
leaves in wort, which must be regarded as, in this respect, a perfectly 
harmless draught. 

Case CXIL— Powder op Jalap-root and Jalap-soap as 
Abortives. 

Her seducer had given the unmarried woman, D., a black, doughy 
mass, with instructions for her to swallow it, and was therefore 
suspected of having attempted to procure abortion. The investiga- 
tion of the substance showed that it consisted of one part of the 



414 $42. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

powder of jalap-root and three parts of jalap-soap. There was eight 
grains of it^ and as a third of it had been expended in a preliminaiy 
police examination^ it might be assumed that the attempt had been 
made with twelve grains. These must have contained three grains 
of the powder of the root and nine grains of soiq), but as jalap-soap 
consists of equal parts of the resin of jalap and medicinal soap^ the 
mai« must have contained three grains of the powder of jalap-root 
and four grains and a-half of the resin of jalap with four grains and 
a-half of soap, the latter being of no consequence. It was now stated 
that this was not even a strong purgative, not to speak of a means of 
producing abortion ; and it was also mentioned that the apothecaries 
are permitted by statute to sell so-called laxative or blood-purifying 
piUs, which are composed of precisely these materials. 

Case CXIH. — Red Chalk in Brandy as an ABORTrvB. 

A female friend bad recommended this substance to M.^ who was 
illegitimately pregnant. Bed chalk, I explained, is nothing else than 
clay coloured red by a mixture of ferruginous chalk, and as such it is 
perfectly harmless in regard to the matter in question, and can never 
be reckoned as a means likely to produce abortion. That brandy in 
large and frequently repeated doses may certainly produce abortion, 
is proved by daily experience in regsurd to drunkards who have 
become pregnant. Since, however, the woman, M., according to 
the documentary evidence, has only once swallowed a very small 
quantity of brandy, mixed with red chalk, or rather, has not even 
swallowed this, but at once spat it out again, so I must declare that 
this medicament, as employed in this case, could not occasion the 
expulsion of the foetus (for so the question was put). 

Case CXIV. — ^A Midwife accused of having repeatedly 
CAUSED Abortions. 

This is the curious case already cursorily referred to (p. 388, 
Vol. III.). It happened more than eighteen years ago, and during 
its course the following ten questions were put before us. '^ 1. 
Whether drugs actually exist, by the employment of which a foetus 
may possibly be expelled before the completion of the natural time 
of pregnancy? 2. Whether it is to be assumed from the statements 
of Mrs. E., that such drugs have been administered to her by the 



§ 42. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 415 

midwife, S. P 3. Wliether the actual expulsion of the foetus has 
been the result of this administration? 4. Whether an abortion 
thrice repeated can leave any traces behind it, particularly on 
the genitals of the injured female? 5. Whether any such traces 
are to be found upon Mrs. E. ? 6. Whether the gemtals of E. are 
in a normal condition ? 7. Whether from the documentary evidence 
any fault can be found with the proceedings of the midwife, S., in 
the ordinary discharge of her duty to E. ? 8. Whether anything 
can be thus ascertamed confirmatory of the statements of E. ? 9. 
Whether among the drugs found in the possession of the midwife, S., 
or among those found in the possession of the house-servant, E., 
there are any which might possibly be fitted to produce the direct 
expulsion of a foetus ? 10. What is the mental condition of Mrs. 
E. ? *' By means of my report, the latter query was brought 
prominently forward, and this occasioned a fresh judicial investiga- 
tion, examination of witnesses, &c., and a second report was required 
from me. Prom both of these fully detailed and reasoned reports 
I will only give here concisely the most important points. Mrs. E. 
lived unhappily with her husband, who was a servant in a drug- 
shop, from which he had stolen a great quantity of stufif of various 
kinds, which he kept in his own house, and to these reference is made in 
the ninth query. Mrs. E. was thirty-seven years of age, and had 
been married for eight years. Her first pregnancy ended in a pre- 
mature confinement, but when ? could not be ascertained. Subse- 
quently she produced two daughters, each at the full time. Two years 
ago she again became pregnant, and according to her statement she 
then applied to the midwife, S., to get this foetus expelled. She was 
said to have employed injections into the genitals, which caused the 
most violent bodily pains, and the expulsion of the foetus was fol- 
lowed by a three weeks' illness. The medical man who attended her, 
certified that this illness was a catarrhal affection attended by aph- 
thous ulceration of the mouth. Next year E. again became pregnant, 
and then, as well as in a third pregnancy, at the end of this year, the 
midwife again employed the injections ; the first time with the effect 
of causing the expulsion of the foetus ; the last time this did not 
occur, for she also tore " something'^ or " a piece of flesh'' out of her 
body, whereupon another long illness was said to have occurred. After 
Mrs. E. had laid this accusation, she flung herself one morning into 
the water, but was rescued, and on account of her violent emotional 
excitement, she was sent to the Charite Hospital. The midwife, who 



416 t 42. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 

was put in prison^ where she died during the coarse of the investiga- 
tion^ all along most consistently declared the accosation of Mrs. E. to 
be slanderous lies, asserting that her assistance had been each time 
sought just as the abortion was threatening, and that the injections 
which die employed were only composed of pure oil of henbane, 
which she used as a means of alleviating pain, for which purpose she 
also occasionaUy gave a few drops of laudanum. At the examination 
of E., besides the appearance of the breasts and abdominal coverings 
usual in a muUipara, we found a small prolapse of the posterior wall 
of the vagina, which was of no consequence, and not the slightest 
trace of any injury, or anything else anomalous either in the vagina 
or its neighbourhood. The vaginal portion of the uterus was some- 
what low in position, the lips of the os uteri exhibited two small 
lacerations, the result of the previous deliveries, and there was no- 
thing else remarkable to be found upon the whole body. After we 
had made a general statement in regard to the means of producing 
abortion, we had to declare that out of the large number of drugs 
and medicaments taken out of the possession of E., eight different 
ethereal oils, castor oil, rhubarb, agaric, safiron, and aloes, were, all of 
them drugs fitted, under certain circumstances, to produce the expul- 
sion of a foetus. In the further investigation of the case it became 
more and more evident that our suspicions that Mrs. E. was mentally 
affected, which were excited at the very first, were actually well 
founded. And we discovered that her derangement, for her mental 
condition rapidly developed during her confinement into actual de- 
rangement, had originated in a hysterical anxiety for her bodily 
health. For all her delusions were connected with this subject. 
"When induced to speak of it, she asserted with tears and wringing 
of her hands, that she was ''ruined,^' that by the proceedings of the 
midwife she had been mutilated for ever, that the end of her days 
was at hand, &c. In a little while she began to assert that she was 
also poisoned, and that by her husband; finally, she declared in plain 
terms that her second child had been poisoned by the midwife. She 
would neither be advised nor appeased by any remonstrance that she 
was neither mutilated, nor affected by any important disease; but. 
that she was, on the contrary, perfectly robust and healthy. She 
soon became affected with hallucinations ; she fancied she heard the 
voices of men beneath her window, calling to her that she was poi- 
soned, &c. In such a state of matters, I answered the queries put 
before me as follows : '* That there are actual drugs and modes of 



§ 42. ILLUSTRATIVE CASES. 417 

action, by the employment of which a fcetus may possibly be expelled 
before the conclusion of the natural term of pregnancy; that it is, 
however, improbable that any such means have been employed on 
E. by the midwife, and that the actual expulsion of the fcetus has 
been the result of suqh means; that the expulsion of a foetus, 
and particularly the threefold repetition of this, may leave traces, 
particularly upon the genitals of the female party injured; that, how- 
ever, these have not been found upon the person of Mrs. E. ; 
that her genitals were in a normal condition; that nothing can be 
ascertained from the documentary evidence at all objectionable in the 
proceedings of the midwife while giving her professional assistance — 
except the use of opiates, which she was not authorized to employ — 
and that, in particular, nothing can be ascertained from them at all 
confirmatory of the statements of E. ; that amongst the drugs in the 
possession of the midwife there were none, but several were found 
amongst those in the possession of the house-servant, E., which were 
fitted to produce the expulsion of a foetus : that Mrs. E. labours 
under a fixed delusion that her husband and the midwife, S., by their 
attempts -to produce abortion and to poison her, have incurably ruined 
her health.^^ It was subsequently completely confirmed that all these 
fancied abortions solely existed in the morbid imagination of Mrs. 
E., and certainly this instance of an accusation of provocatio abortm, 
arising out of a condition of mental derangement, which could not 
be presupposed, and which had for its result a long investigation of 
two parties, presents a most unusual example of a medico-legal case. 



END OF VOL. III. 



Printed by J. W. Bochb, 5, Kirby Street, Hatton Garden. 
VOL. III. E E 



COUNTWAY LIBRARY 



HC anuF c