Skip to main content

Full text of "The American midland naturalist"

See other formats


E2855, SEM EEA 


, “5 
AP) een» |) 1) | | mM Sune vee 
\ aS, rr Ns on™ core 


7 P hd AS ee t 5 : f a) Th . whi Steen yf 


A | Vy ‘ ee ers. 
“ey Myvyhtyy n Vii Wows: et te sunrecee hy el P id i 


Ser easenra iT aNa atl | athe eee 
PH) LLL Lidia PPR Meas SE ke null Titra 


he Ry vy e « |) “We bd vv Ww Bae tee ay ~ 
neg. wes f Nx ba "Iiree.8 ride 2 ein ut ad v vb. weet NUS 


b: ¢ Vey . Ad Belts 
Vy iid -% Way. Perr / yD Fe 2? UN The “ny wert 
avrtbccaveeh tl welginn merece etgaat im 7 YT as thoes es 


we Pel | vay Pens a aaeenine? seyvg, awe 

. y vie AA) FE hil eth A iT oe) gues q 
vquestegenyy? | BTU WELL aha de qe Pr ba bal bide 
Waal eee ee ere DAME Pet te ry uct: 


imeneocear ul TTI Beseraame: 
uN oVEE ott Ol Tate New retionencdant ‘ 1 fr rhea cE ee 


or ant 


* ~ ©? ng " es Dy ett Sete J) 
J Mm VULNS AS Ate LOR AS fe tiebel Pole wy LUT T 
” 4 7 segues — = ts 4 : \ wy Wg ab) 7 ~~ fa 4 % ° 4 
g: a Sd : e Van. “4 aww~ eee ngewe ee Jee a bela prov es | 
Snr poe hug us? 
agi Ars deh dd Met yy wv G7 4 Te gC. ®t wet ~ angen JAPAN wis! 
rN yw phew Fee as Ad] ft Z Wa. eas Le 

ol 
oN, we 


ili Tah Yoled Yoke 
qlredysy weer oh Lalit 
Diabet leh FEB Nr gnseaite cull 


yng, wh ml weve YS Thy abd taal hela tt fo 
“° w 4& e $4 sage ; 
"Sue A ulin 4 ie. ; re es an | roa 

: WwW “ahi divi Ti | 


N° Raye” 


2° Kay 


wAD , ‘ ee WA, 
Raa TORaDSrOL UVR AO AL | ale 
Wages Cus A Wo ere nor NWwuty 


. ~* 
1) oe) She 1} ~ we 
a 
1 = ee { @ r' 
wrey SEU CS velari wnt wrk 


: wy “¥ TN 
tyty WOMB, UL a CUE R ORE EE atin yates liye qtes 
S vee ] NAS SVS i a VY A. “ve Ws, HA 
oy “% 4 fa he _PPfurtd worse vont Var — Sw a Aa 
7 in mea | Oe eee yy dy ts “y 


SN 4 ‘cme Ewe fE = rw 
a , cote get wit’- waver ~ riVowy 
dad 1 WELLL ET ATTN Yi 


| at ayy 
a hh be “‘ 
RET ELLL | wee ASL ns er Sa A dy 
Aabee Ti) | ive 2 
EN artes ee LT 
J SS. Wirt Le ie anne 
" os 18 Witenes: seeGBocn cee is 
Lh Te ww *"~ WV wueeys TN AAA LA 1U nh tie ree 
Cbd OO) aL TTT woe yeeros Cae we ffl hr vey 
Oy a! wid Ant wo a bd Tdi um wre 
sft Woae tht pth Weg ue Me AL 9 Hay! 4 Yy rel 4 bill er y 
; ¥ wv yey Not arte PAINS Dewy me MY ‘agua ee ees 
s | : | » fd : “- = — a \ Need © Py w~ - ” 
ee ere year weld °y. 2 telah el Nits tse cebet cutee ae ‘ ne 
1) pers) | | ve ' ee ent || Ww. Nes by “vb ~ 
= Paskeoee vias Mw wall ay. veel. ~ iy, ey ®t. LAA wwe y “~ Vee w we 
" ' ' 4 ty | "EEE Tei Ge o ke 
af es | e* Mi tise 9 te we 3g, 78a =< ro Ww re 
Vasa ee | Sie 


|| of ‘ot CL aD a 
Niet {Ths Ceeees s Doe VO te cele wd “ 


we Vere © aun 
*” ee 6 
Bs oy pe ial : M J tteg - 
RAR Ph A anes Ssbabedt went D Vy 
Ne Sate SH : B SRSA OS % * 
Pere Wg artnet AIS Swou Cue NV Se 
TRF ‘ Bau Thad thal A s AA SN 
an wy = Ne A Wye =A eo eS, N te oY Vv. 
. r~ ul "ny ‘a sn Wg Thy 1 fare * we vuwy AA RAA RAD e ~~ S| 
s_ ‘ = é sue: ma - Nt ie Ss al ||| pe ey. My geen’ se re a ee Veveres as ~ os 
vege” WP Tee qt} : ice yr: vy ve eeeen 
IP f | ay Se oe ee i Ts | itv 
1 ‘ a es ; +t BK We hh! habs 
~ichaavt be | wa mh at errr ide 
1 oyna ae Se eT TM 
TT STiTETON cos Oe OUNCE Lake 
é ’ Ny Ge, fr) ate Iie, a, WW ' bs 7” | 
bee. a a \) ae he vue: LAP yr Ths gsi Nt 
Ne yt Vey, Pus! Ny eh TE TT te 
‘% ‘wv if Nay, “\ 2 Mu wr eye - ~" sais Oa ad ag A} +4 %  OvCuy 
v ‘ be 1 vw ws 
wap ett d Mats cetay Ny Seas ceo 
he . wre ‘| &@ : NWA i 
Sin a a Oi WN BD veut Nene eoeonen angel tg 1 WATE 
é txt ey" aa dy) Wy ee ap re Soe were eel oe bee thy A° ¥ 


f Lv “Ly * SR oe a Os obey: 
Wee hs eA LS ‘ Ww & We ‘in Sie LA RAL, ie, 


‘se. ~ = ~ ( 

SAH ig ili EL! Ps |) | iN Wwe hiyy "Wey jal 
bog Uy | iat SOS Piatt thal talent ft oe @iw.. Ad) |) orn vege ‘Sy 
| Wyse, “ey Veey tye ah Te kd Peppa OT as tte Te nie a tBie: ¥ 
Sade A May aval) "y ee Sete pet a etded eee oa fore eeneqen 
a) a" Sy Pe w) i z Deuyertdy Tee Ty TL bbb ~ s' vw ee se uo wby v Vfe ts 2 yu 

¥ Tt OR Np AL STS || Rt ey +4 Eb hd vy 
egvalaqenyy’ Wore secs. Ul By oteeeeetOs q geevapt yell 
esieateverey ALT || TTT , Set rae wiu trent twee Mntree 5 UN Ob namie 
@ | i, =. Pe) uae ervey PPP EPEC EY Lf . oF woke - aw. 


a Tk 
a ve. : 


bts 
ls 


a a 
| 
amy, 


C~ L 


[¥ . on ; LLOF! 
THE AMERICAN | 


MIDLAND NATURALIST 


DEVOTED TO NATURAL HISTORY, PRIMARILY 
THAT OF THE PRAIRIE STATES 


JULIUS A. NIEUWLAND, C. S. C., PH. D., Sc. D. 
EDITOR 


VOLUME VI. 1919-1920 


EVA SS 


UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME 
NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


CONTENTS 


Birds of a Washington City Dooryard.—Harry C. Oberholser_.............-.-... rk 


Insect Migration in Floyd and Adjoining Counties of Iowa.—Carroll 
Land Fenton : 


crete SE TT IRL ENE Se ie MDA Yr Sales ete a ee eet ne ee et 13 
My Favorite Song Bird.— Brother Alphonsus, C. S. C...._.--.----------------------—- 16 
The Missouri Muhlenbergias.—Benjamin Franklin Bush_.........17, 33, 57, 81 
DE Cy Les ER Wa TV ee ee oe a Ee ES Sane Sere 29 
Panicum Lineare, Linn.—Olkver A. Farwell. ..-2.._-2--222-2cetec-cecnnwnnen nee Ba 
Guar Sparrows.— Brother Alphonsus, C. S.C ono avant w astern dcnnep neeeceenee 51 
ieeelyeatchers:— Brother-Alphonsus, C. S.C. o-oo nosed heer ece cece 78 
‘irds Observed at Notre Dame, Indiana, in the Spring of 1919.—Brother 
SST oO CR CRD apa: Seip ee In Rie See Oe sean | ee eee ee eC or 98 
An All-Day Bird Trip at Washington, D. C_—Harry C. Oberholser........... 103 
Household Insects and their Remedies.—B. W. Schetb___...............----2---------~ IIl 
Aquatic Life; With Special Reference to Entomostraca.—Joseph Stack........ 128 
Our Birds in November.—Brother Alphonsus, C. S. C......2-222-..---.222222-2----------- 145 
Notes on Variation in Chicory.—N. M. Grier, Ph. D.g-.------------------000----------- 148 
Our Birds in December.—Brother Alphonsus, C. S. C.......222-2---------2--------------- 149 
Wotesion Alabama Plants: W«-Wolf,,O S. Buco On 1 ee I51 


The Biological Significance of Selective Adsorption.—Jean Dufrenoy........ 159 


Sexual Dimorphism and Some of Its Correlations in the Shells of Certain 
Speties a: Naladesi- NW, IM. Griet ps2. Di fo OO ee ee 165 


Prairie -Mirace:— Howard Ci Browns st eet 172 


erry Stage of the Upper Devonian. (Plate 1.)—Carroll 


Birds Observed at Notre Dame, Indiana, in the Fall of 1919.—Brother 
Alphonsys, ee SiC 


_ 


Dr; Joel. Lunell (Frontispiece)... 252.2 2 ee 243 
Waterfowl in Nebraska—Brother Alphonsus, C.1S. C.o...222---2ceseeecee--eeeeneenes 245 


; ‘ 
Variation in Epidermal Color of Certain Species of Najades Inhabiting 
the Upper Ohio Drainage and their Corresponding Ones in L. Erie. 


=— Ni Me Grier, Phy: Decco ee ee ee a 247 


Observations on Some Marine Plants of the Iowa Devonian, With De- 
scriptions of New Genera and Species —Clement L. Webster, M. Sc....286 

Birds Observed at Brookland, D. C. from Aug. 19 to Sept. 7, 1920.— 
Brother Alphonsus, C. S. C..........- SOF Pema eld (Yeerks a OO 290 


JANUARY, 1919 


yh. No. 1 
ndtv MIDLAND 
AMERICAN 
Ee | 
3 NATURALIST 
‘ Devoted to Natural History, Primarily 
Be. that of the Prairie States 

Published by the University of Notre Dame, 
‘sa Notre Dame, Indiana 
.. J. A. NIEUWLAND, C.S.G., Ph. D., Sc. D.,. Editor Me 
ity 

CONTENTS 

Birds of a Washington City Dooryard = Harry C. Oberholser 1 
: Insect Migration in Floyd and Adjoining Counties 

# of Iowa Carroll Lane Fenton 13 
My Favorite Song Bird Broiher Alphonsus, C. S.C. 16 
PRICE $1.50 A YEAR SINGLE NUMBERS 30 CENTS 


FOREIGN, 6s. 6d. 


Entered as second-class matter at Notre Dame, Indiana. Acceptance for mailing at special 


rate of postage provided for in section 1103, Act of October 3, 1917, 
authorized on July 3, 1918. 


THE UNIVERSITY PRESS, NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 
' s 4 


ye 


Be SSA SS STS Sr Tenner Sree enon enone en OS oR S oA eee ean oneness orien ies nearer 


Ri Soa VP a a ee ie SP AR er OU | ces ay if 
CON tn a, A A R 
Dh Mo BRR pti og st Pe nS hi a < 


ae 


general and midland natural 


Contributions on 
history will be gladly received. Papers on botany 
and. allied subjects, zoology, geology and _ physical 
geography, should be addressed to the editor. 

Matters relating to advertisements are to be 


| _taken up with the secretary of the University. 
: 


WERE (UE Si 


ae 
i One hundred reprints of articles averaging a 
eight pages or more will be furnished free of charge ; int 
to contributors. More than one hundred separates can Sie 


be obtained at cost price. of the extras. When articles 
consist of less than eight pages, a certain number 
of copies of THE AMERICAN MipLAND NATURALIST in 
which the paper appeared will be supplied free, or 
the separate, articles may, by arrangement with the — 
editor, be kept until future papers average eight pages, 
provided the contributions are sent in for the next’ 
consecutive issue for publication. Contributors of 
articles will receive a free subscription for the year 
in. which their paper appeats. For further or other 
information address 

THE Epiror, Notre Dame, Indiana 


‘CG SASRARAA LALA AALS ST 


Original Old Books. 


INGE ELMANN, G. .Cactaceae of the Mexican Boundary (1758) Survey. . \ i 
75 bez autifu plates:: V7.8: pp, Bounds separate: cogs os hath Mir ia io 2450 4 
Write for information. 5 sy 


Duplicates for Sale 


PAXTON’S MAGAZINE OF BoTANy, London, 1834-1840, 1843-1846. 
Vols. 1-7, 10-r2 inclusive.  1c¢ volumes. Numerous hand- 
colored illustrations, exquisitely finished, beautifully bound in ms 
half leather, tooled in gold. Not much worn. (Vol. 7 in cloth.) 
Nety $150: per VOlUmMeia Dobe ake vie ueh 2 Ug ae bE ha) sae a $15.00 Ay 


The American Midland Naturalist 


PUBLISHED BI-MONTHLY BY THE UNIVERSITY 
OF NOTRE DAME, NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


VOL. VI. JANUARY, roro. NO. 1. 


Birds of a Washington City Dooryard. 


BY HARRY C. OBERHOLSER. 


Attention has on a number of occasions been called to the fact 
that even in the midst of a large city numerous opportunities for 
out-of-door bird study exist. Many more birds than one might 
think venture into the closely built-up portions of the city, par- 
ticularly wherever any trees or shrubbery are to be found. The 
writer has for a long time been interested in this phase of orni- 
thology, especially to see what species come into our city of 
Washington, D. C., and at what seasons of the year. 

From May 5 1911, to May 1, 1918, we lived at No. 1444 Fair- 
mont Street, N. W., and there, with a number of interruptions, 
but, as opportunity permitted, more or less continuously, especially 
during the past four years, made observations on birds. These 
notes were taken of necessity incidentally, chiefly in the mornings 
before 8 o’clock and in the evenings after 6, except on Sundays 
and holidays, when, of course, more hours were available. 

The house in which we lived stands between 14th Street and 
University Place, in a solid row; and the entire street on both 
sides east to the next corner at 14th Street is entirely occupied by 
dwellings. In front of the house there were two rows of small 
trees, one along each side of the street. At the western end of the 
block are two or three large silver poplar trees, inside a yard. 
The back yard of our house, together with those of several adjoin- 
ing dwellings on the same street, and the large double yard of the 
house just back of ours, which faces on Euclid Street (the first 
street south), form a considerable open space divided only by low 
fenees. In this area there is considerable shrubbery, a few small 
trees, and several large silver poplars, one of the latter being in 
our own yard. This place is, consequently, a decided attraction 


2 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


for birds, as the number of species which frequent it indicates. 

The total number of different kinds of birds observed during 
the seven years amounts to 100, including those observed flying 
over but not actually alighting. On some occasions during spring 
and autumn many birds were identified from their notes as they 
passed low over the city on their migration at night. Our list, 
while not so large as some lists from other cities, includes, never- 
theless, not a few rare or unexpected birds, though it is almost as 
remarkable for specics that it does not contain. There is, of course, 
more or less of chance in desultory observations of this character, 
and the missing birds may well have occurred during the period 
of observation, but accidentally escaped being seen. Some species 
have, apparently, their regular times for coming into the city, 
not necessarily coextensive with their period of occurrence in this 
general region, and this applies even to transients. Naturally 
spring and autumn are in general the best seasons, but it seems 
that the latter is even better in some respects than spring, for 
we have observed more species during a single day here in fall 
than ever in spring. The very best time, at least for a variety of 
birds, is the last week in September, especially if the weather is 
fine. As an indication of what may be seen at this time, the two 
following lists from observations made about an hour before 8 a. m. 
and during the evening after 6 o’clock may be found of interest: 

September 26, 1916.—American Sparrow Hawk, Northern 
Flicker, Brown Thrasher, Bluebird, Southern Robin, Gray- 
cheeked Thrush, Olive-backed Thrush, Red-breasted Nuthatch, 
Blue Jay, Fish Crow, Cedar Waxwing, American Redstart, Cape 
May Warbler, Black and White Warbler, Purple Grackle, Car- 
dinal, English Sparrow, Purple Finch. Total, 18 species. 

September 21, 1917.—Sora Rail, Northern Flicker, Chimney 
Swift, Bluebird, Southern Robin, Hermit Thrush, Gray-cheeked 
Thrush, Olive-backed Thrush, Blue jay, Cedar Waxwing, 
American Redstart, Black-poll Warbler, Magnolia Warbler, 
Bobolink Purple Grackle, Cardinal, English Sparrow, American 
Goldfinch. Total, 18 species. 


A complete catalogue of all the species observed during our - 


period of observation, with brief notes on their occurrence, will 
be found in the succeeding pages. We are indebted to Miss May 
T. Cooke of 1450 Fairmont St. N. W., for several records additional 
to our own. 


ee ee ee Pe Se ee ee ee 


BIRDS OF A WASHINGTON CITY DOORYARD 3 


1. Nycticorax nycticorax naevius. Black-crowned Night Heron. 

This species was observed on_three occasions flying over—May 
18, 1914; September 1, 1917; and January 17, 1918. 

2. Butorides virescens virescens. Green Heror. 

Noted on four occasions—May 13, 1912; May 18, 1917; August 
21, 1916; and August 24, 1914. 

3. Cathartes aura septentrionalis. Turkey Vulture. 

Although the Turkey Buzzard is of common occurrence about 
Washington, we have actually seen it at this place in the city only 
three times—February 28, 1915; September 24, 1916; and Septem- 
ber 23, 1917; on each occasion sailing over high in the air. 

4. Tinnunculus columbarius columbarius. Pigeon Hawk. 

One seen flying over on February 20, 1916. ; 

5. Cerchnets sparveria sparveria. American Spasrow Hawk. 

This bird breeds in the cornices of buildings in our section of 
the city, and we have frequently seen it at our place, either flying 
over or perching on the very top of the large silver poplar tree 
ir the yard. It has been noticed most often in April, May, Septem- 
ber, and October, the earliest date being April 11, 1915, and the 
latest, November 9, 1915. 


6. Colinus virginianus virginianus. Bob-white. 

This was one of our most interesting and most unexpected 
visitors. Once a single bird, on a date not recorded, came into the 
back yard and perched on one of the fences for a considerable 
time. On September 21, 1913, two birds were heard calling from 
the trees in the street in front of the house; and on May 6, 1914, one 
was heard in the area back of the house. There seems to be little 
attraction for a Bob-white in the city, a place so very different 
from its native heath. 


7. Porzana carolina. Sora Rail. 

One individual heard calling in flight over the house on the 
night of September 21, 1917. 

8. Tringa solitaria solitaria. Solitary Sandpiper. 

Noted on two occasions flying over—May 13, 1912, and May 
21, 1917. It is of interest to mention that the latter date equals the 
latest previous spring record for the species in the vicinity of 
Washington. 

9, Bartramia longicauda. Upland Plover. 

The Upland Plover is now one of the rare birds about Wash- 


4 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


ington. Its mellow, characteristic note was several times heard on 
the night of August 21, 1916, coming from two birds flying over 
our place, evidently on their migration. 


10. Actitis macularia. Spotted Sandpiper. 

Heard on three occasions, flying over at night—April 28, 1915; 
and May 13 and 14, 1914. 

11. Oxyechus vociferus vociferus. Killdeer. 

Heard flying over at night on three dates—May 15, 1918: 
May 13, 1912; and September 10, 1915. 

12. Zenaidura macroura carolinensis. Mourning Dove. 

Seen on only one occasion—July 4, 1915. 

13. Coccyzus americanus americanus. Yellow-billed Cuckoo. 

Observed only in June, July and August, and not since 1915. 
The earliest date is June 23, 1914, the latest, August 23, 1914. 

14. Coccyzus erythropthalmus. Black-billed Cuckoo. 

Noted only once—on September 19, 1915. 

15. Colaptes auratus luteus. Northern Flicker. 

One of the commonest birds from March to September, and up 
to October 3 (1916). We observed it also on January 17 and 23, 
1916. In the spring of 1915 and of 1916 a pair had a nest in the 
dead portion of the trunk of one of the high silver poplar trees in 
the large yard back of ours. We could watch the birds from the 
windows of the house and found their behavior of great interest. 
The birds could be heard calling at almost any time of the day 
during the early spring. 

16. Melanerpes erythrocephalus. Red-headed Woodpecker. 

Of nothing like as common occurrence as the Flicker, and very 
irregular. Seen from May 25 to 30, 1916; on June 2, 1916; June 
29, 1914; August 18, 1914; September 8, 1915; and September 
24, 1916. 

17. Dryobates pubescens medianus. Downy Woodpecker. 

A more or less frequent visitor during August, September, and 
October, but strange to say, not observed in any other month of 
the year. Its earliest date is August 14, 1915, and its latest, October 
tA; 1917. 

18. Dryobates villosus villosus. Hairy Woodpecker. 

Once observed, but the date was not recorded. 


19. Sphyrapicus varius varius. Yellow-bellied Sapsucker. 


: 


BIRDS OF A WASHINGTON CITY DOORYARD 5 


One seen by Miss May T. Cooke, among the trees in the yard 
at the west erd of our block, but we have no other record. 


20. Otus asio naevius. Screech Owl. 

Heard calling on the evenings of September 25, 1917, and October 
4, 1914. 

21. Chordeiles minor minor. Night Hawk. 

Seen on only one occasion, and then flying over. This was on 
May 21, 114. 

22. Archilochus colubris. Ruby-throated Hummingbird. 

This species occasionally came to the flowers in the yards during 
August and September. Our latest record is September 21, 1916. 
It was only once noted at any other time of the year—this on 
May 10, 1917. | 

23. Chaetura pelagica. Chimney Swift. 

Of frequent occurrence, of course on the wing, from May 9 
(1915) to September 22 (1917). 

24. Horizopus virens. Wood Pewee. 

For this species we have only two records: May 24, 1914, and 
September 3, I9g14. 

25. Myiarchus crinitus crinitus. Crested Flycatcher. 

Observed, May 13, 1912; May 30, 1916; September 19; 10175 
and on one other occasion. 

26. Tyrannus tyrannus tyrannus. Kingbird. 

Three records: April 27, 1915; May 21, 1915; and August 
18, 1914. 

27. Sturnus vulgaris vulgaris. European Starling. 

The dead top of the tall silver poplar tree in our back yard 
seemed to form the special attraction for this species. One was seen 
perched on the summit, December 24, 1916; two others on January 
6, 1918; and a flock of six on January 28, 1917. We have no other 
records. 


28. Toxostoma rufum rufum. Brown Thrasher. 

Not of regular occurrence, but it occasionally wandered into the 
yards during September and October, though we did not see it 
at any other time; in fact, the only records are two individuals on 
September 26, 1916; and one each on September 23, 1914, and 
October 1 and 3, 1916. 


29. Mimus polyglottos polyglottos. Mockingbird. 


6 : THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Occasionally visited the area back of our hoise, but we have 
no definite dates. 


30. Lucar carolinensis. Catbird. 

Seen only during April and May, and very irregular during even 
these months. It was earliest noted on April 24, 1917, and latest, 
May 31, 1914. 

31. Svzalia sialis sialis. Bluebird. 

Of occasional occurrence from September to May, but most 
frequently seen during the months of September, October, and 
March. Our only other records are for May 13, 1912, and Febrvary 
a7 I19I7. 

32. Planesticus migratorius achrusterus. Southern Robin. 

Common from March to October, and perhaps once in a while 
nested within the area. Observed on February 14, 1915, and as 
late as October 27, 1917, but never in November, December, or 
January. Some of the autumn records probably refer to the 
Northern Robin, Planesticus migratorius migratorius. 


33. Hylocichla fuscescens fuscescens. Wilson Thrush. 
One seen in the tall tree in our yard, May 13, 1912, but on no 
other occasion. 


34. Hylocichla guttata pallasit. Hermit Thrush. 

Our only record is one individual seen on September 21, 1917. 
This, however, is an unusually early date for the species in the 
vicinity of Washington, as its average arrival here is October 17, 
and the very earliest previously recorded date is September 18, 
1900. 


35. Hylocichla aliciae aliciae. Gray-cheeked Thrush. 

This species was seen on September 18, 1917; September 21, 
1917; and October 4, 1917. Five individuals, also, were noted in 
our large silver poplar tree on September 26, 1916. The records 
for September 18 and 21 are unusually early for the vicinity of 
Washington, as the average autumn arrival of this species is Septem- 
ber 25, and its earliest date, September 15, 1897. 


36. Hylocichla ustulata swainsoni. Olive-backed ‘Thrush. 

This species is of much more frequent occurrence than the Gray- 
cheeked Thrush. It has been noted from May 13 (1912) to May 
25 (1916); and from September 15 (1915) to October 4 (1917). 
It was heard on May 21, 1915, singing almost as well as in summer. 


BIRDS OF A WASHINGTON CITY DOORYARD 7. 


37. Hylocichla mustelina. Wood Thrush. 

Rather strangely of not at all frequent occurrence. There are 
only three positive records—May 17 and 20, 1917, and one other 
for which we have no definite date. - 


38. Polioptila caerulea caerulea. Blue-gray Gnatcatcher. 
Once observed, but date not recorded. 


39. Regulus calendula calendula. Ruby-crowned Kinglet. 
Seen, October 11, 1917, and November 4, 1916. 


40. Orchilus regulus satrapa. Golden-crowned Kinglet. 

Of much more frequent occurrence than the Ruby-crowned 
Kinglet, but still not very common. Noted on only the following 
dates: October 5 and 15, 1913; October 7 and 8, 1916; October 
31, 1915; and November 7, 1915. For the vicinity of Washington, 
the average arrival at this season is October 6. 


41. Nannus troglodytes hiemalis. Winter Wren. 
One was reported in autumn by Miss May T. Cooke, but date 
not recorded. 


42. Troglodytes aedon aedon. House Wren. 

Strange to say, of very infrequent occurrence, and observed 
only in May. Our records are May 2, 1915, May 4, 1914, and May 
BE EOE]. 

43. TIhryothorus ludovictanus ludovicianus. Carolina Wren. 

Also of very infrequent occurrence. The only dates are May 
8, 1914; August 22, 1915; and October 26, 1916. 

44. Certhia familiaris americana. Brown Creeper. 

Observed on but one occasion, of which the date was not noted. 


45. Szttta canadensis. Red-breasted Nuthatch. 

Observed occasionally in September and October, but in no 
other month of the year. Our records are: September 18, 1914; 
september -26 and 27, 1916; October -3,-.6;°7, 8, ‘and. 15, .1916; 
and October 5, 1913. 


46. Szitta carolinensis cooket. White-breasted Nuthatch. 

This bird seems to be much less frequent than the Red-breasted 
Nuthatch, for we have only two definite records—October 5 and 
23, 1913,:and one other without date. 


47. Penthestes carolinensis carolinensis. Carolina Chickadee. 
Once noted, but date unknown. 


8 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


48. Baeolophus bicolor. ‘Tufted ‘Titmouse. 

Two records—May 18, 1914, and May 26, 1916. ‘This seems to 
be, in a way, rather remarkable, because one would expect the 
species in such a place during the winter rather than during the 
breeding season. 

49. Cyanocitta cristata cristata. Blue Jay. 

Tolerably common from September to early May, but most 
frequently observed in September. We have not noted it in the 
fall earlier than September 5 (1915), nor in spring later than May 
2 (1915). 

50. Corvus osstfragus. Fish Crow. - 

Another very common species, of regular occurrence from August 
to May, but not noted in June or July. 

51. Corvus brachyrhynchos paulus. Southern Crow. 

One of the most frequent birds from October to May, but not 
noticed in summer. Doubtless some of the individuals seen during 
the winter months belong to the common American Crow, Corvus 
brachyrhynchos brachyrhynchos, but as no specimens were taken 
it is, of course, impossisle to verify this probability. 

52. Lanivireo flavifrons. Yellow-throated Vireo. 

A tolerably common summer resident, noted from May 1 (1914) 
to September 2 (1917). It was heard singing on August 23, 1914. 

53. Vireosylva gilva gilua. Warbling Vireo. 

For this uncommon species in the city of Washington we have 
but a single record—May 19, 1914. 

54. Vzireosylva olivacea. Red-eyed Vireo. 

For so common a bird we have surprisingly few dates. They 
are: May ri-and 21, 71016;.. May 23,°1915;" May:28,%1914, vane 
September 24, 1914. It was also heard singing on August 23, 1914. 


55- Bombycilla cedrorum. Cedar Waxwing. 

Noticed occasionally from March 18 (1916) to June 2 (1916), 
and from August 19 (1917) to September 26 (1917). Rather 
strangely not seen at any other time of the year. 


56. Iridoprocne bicolor. Tree Swallow. 
A flock of 10 was seen flying over high in the air on August 23, 
1916, but no others have been observed. 


57. Huirundo rustica erythrogastris. Barn Swallow. 
Seen once—on May 10, 1917. 


a Se ee a 


BIRDS OF A WASHINGTON CITY DOORYARD - 9: 


58. Stelgidopteryx serripennis  serripennis. Rough-winged 
Swallow. 

For this swallow, also, we have but a single date—May 10, 1917. 

59. Progne subis subis. Purple Martin. 

Occasionally seen from May to September. Our earliest date 
is May 13, 1915, and the latest, September 3, 1917. It is of most 
frequent occurrence during the period of roosting; that is, during 
August and early September. 


60. Setophaga ruticilla. American Redstart. 

Rather frequent from May 3 (1914) to September 26 (1916), 
and apparently the commonest warbler. September 26, it is of 
interest to state, is an unusually late date for this species in the 
vicinity of Washington, since the average date of autumn departure 
is September 19, and the latest date is September 30, 1906. 


61. Waulsonia canadensis. Canadian Warbler. 

Observed on May 20 and 21, 1916, and May 27, 1917, but on no 
other occasions. 

62. Wilsonia citrina.. Hooded Warbler. 

For this beautiful species we have but a single record—May 24, 
IQI4. 

63. Geothlypis trichas trichas. Maryland Yellowthroat. 

One seen on April 24, 1917; and another, in spring, date un- 
known, was reported by Miss May T. Cooke. 

64. Seturus aurocapillus aurocapillus. Ovenbird. 

We have no exact date for this species, but once in spring Miss 
May T. Cooke observed an individual that remained for two days 
about her yard. 


65. Seturus motacilla. Louisiana Water-Thrush. 

We noted a single individual on September 20, 1914, a date 
considerably later than the latest previously known for the 
species anywhere in the vicinity of Washington, which is September 
12, 1895. 

66. Dendroica striata. Black-poll Warbler. 

Sometimes common in May, and noted occasionally in Septem- 
ber and October. The earliest spring date is May 14, 1916; the 
latest, May 31, 1917. Our autumn records are, rather remarkably, 
only September 21, 1917; October 4, 1914; and October 8, 1916. 


67. Dendroica castanea, Bay-breasted Warbler. 


10 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


There is but a single record for this species, and that on May 
30, 1917, which, with a single exception, June 5, 1917, is the latest 
for the vicinity of Washington. 

68. Dendroica pensylvanica. Chestnut-sided Warbler. 

Of this warbler we saw but one, on an unknown date. 

69. Dendroica fusca. Blackburnian Warbler. 

Our single record is October 6, 1916, which is uncommonly late 
for the species in the region about Washington, since its latest 
date is October 7, 1889. 


70. Dendroica virens. Black-throated Green Warbler. 
For this pretty little warbler we have only a few records, which 
are as follows: April 30, 1914; September 17, 21, and 26, 1916. 


71. Dendroica coronata coronata. Myrtle Warbler. 

For so common a species we have surprisingly few notes, as 
follows: May 1 and 2, 1915; May 25, 1917; and October 4, 1914. 
That for May 25 is later than any published date for the species 
about Washington, the previous latest being May 23, 1903, although 
there is an unpublished record for May 30, 1917. 

72. Dendroica caerulescens caerulescens. Black-throated Blue 
Warbler. 

Three instances: May 25 and 27, 1915, and another without 
specific date. 

73. Dendroica tigrina. Cape May Warbler. 

This is one of the warblers that-has recently much increased in 
numbers in the vicinity of Washington. It was not noted in our 
yard until September 21, 1916, and was more or less common 
until October 9 of that year; as many as five sometimes being seen 
within a few minutes. We have only two suksequent records, 
May 24, 1917, and October 8, 1917. It frequented both the trees 
along the street and those in the back yards. 


74. Dendroica magnolia. Magnolia Warbler. 
Identified on only three occasions: September 21, 1916; Septem- 
ber 21, 1917; and October 8, 1916. 


75. Dendroica aestiva aestiva. Yellow Warbler. 

For so common a bird it was rather remarkably seldom seen; 
but it apparently does not come into the city so numerous as 
some other warblers. Our only records are: May 16 and 21, 
1915; May 24, 1914; and June 11, 1916. 


z 
-~ 


= i in i 
PARE a %¥ e tee 


BIRDS OF A WASHINGTON CITY DOORYARD Il 


76. Compsothlypis americana americana. Parula Warbler. 
We have but a single note on this species—a bird seen in the 
trees just in front of the house on October 3, 1916. 


77. Compsothlypis americana pusilla. Northern Parula Warbler. 
We have likewise but one record for this bird—a single fully 
plumaged, typical adult male seen on October 11, 1914. 


78. Vermivora ruficapilla ruficapilla. Nashville Warbler. 

One seen in our back yard on May 6, 1915. 

79. Vermivora peregrina. ‘Tennessee Warbler. 

In 1916 the Tennessee Warbler was unusually numerous in 
spring about Washington, and on May 21 of this year we saw one 
in the large silver poplar tree in our back yard. We noted the 
species also on October 6, 1916, which is rather late, since the 
average time of its departure from this region is October 4. 

80. Mniotilta varia. Black and White Warbler. 

Only twice observed—on September 26, 1916, and on another 
occasion for which we have no definite date. ‘The former record 


' was unusually late for this species, since its average fall departure 


about Washington is September 15. 

81. Dolichonyx oryzivorus. Bobolink. 

Of common occurrence during both spring and fall, but most 
frequently heard migrating at night. We have records from May 
13 (1912) to May 23 (1915); and from August 22 (1916) to Septem- 
er 21<(1017). 

82. Agelaius phoenitceus predatorius. Red-winged Blackbird 

A flock of niné seen flying over on October 11, 1917. Noted 
also, on one or two other occasions for which no date is available. 


83. Icterus galbula. Baltimore Oriole 
One seen on May 18, 1915, but on no other day. 


84. Icterus spurius. Orchard Oriole. 
Seen once, but no record was made of the date. 


85. Qutscalus quiscula quiscula. Purple Grackle. 

This is, with the exception of the English Sparrow, the most 
numerous and frequent visitor to our city yards. Apparently, 
however, it does not breed in this area. It was noted from Feb- 
ruary 25 (1918) to November 5 (1916). 


86. Piranga erythromelas. Scarlet Tanager. 
Noted on May 17, 1915, and on one other occasion, 


rz THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


87. Cardinalis cardinalis cardinalis. Cardinal. 

With the exception of the English Sparrow and the Purple 
Grackle, our most regular and frequent visitor, and seen in every 
month of the year except July. It seems to be most numerous 
during February, March, April, May, September, and October. 
It is one of the most persistent singers of the city yards. 

88. Hedymeles ludovicianus. Rose-breasted Grosbeak. 

We have only two records—one for September 13, 1913, and 
another for which no date was noted. 

89. Linaria cyanea. Indigo Bunting. 

One seen on May 14, 1916, and another on May 18, 1917. 


90. Pipilo erythrophthalmus  erythrophthalmus. . Chewink; 
Towhee. 
Two records: May 13, 1912, and another without date. 


gt. Melospiza melodia melodia. Song Sparrow. 

This bird was remarkably infrequent for a species so common in 
this vicinity. We have but three definite instances—March 31, 
1917; May 30, 1916; and October 21, 1917. 


92. Zonotrichia albicollis. White-throated Sparrow. 
Our few dates are as follows: April 21, 1916; October 11 and 
19, 1916; and November 15, 1916. 


93. Spizella pusilla pusilla. Field Sparrow. 
One heard singing on April 28, 1917. 


94. Spizella passerina passerina. Chipping Sparrow. 
Noted on April 15, 1915, and on another occasion. 


95. Spizella monticola monticola. ‘Tree Sparrow. 

For this species we have three definite records: March 20 and 
24, 1914, and April 13, 1914. The last is a remarkably late date 
for the District of Columbia; in fact, with the single exception of 
two other records, April 14, 1917, and May 11, 1917, it is the very 
latest. 

96. Junco hyemalis hyemalis. Slate-colored Junco. 

Occasionally seen during the winter months. We have records 
from October 7 (1916) to March 30 (1916). 


97. Passer domesticus hostilis. English Sparrow. 
This bird is, of course, the commonest and most permanent 
inhabitant of our yards, and breeds both in the trees and about 


INSECT MIGRATION 13 


the cornices of the buildings. It has been noted during every 
month of the year. 


_ 98. Carpodacus . purpureus purpureus. Purple Finch. 

This bird is more or less common during the autumn, winter, 
and spring, though of rather irregular occurrence. We have records 
from September 9 (1917) to May 20 (1917). Rather often heard 
singing in spring. 

99. Astragalinus tristis tristis. American Goldfinch. 

Occasionally observed, but only in April, May, September, and 
October. 


100. Loxia curvirostra minor. American Crossbill. 
One noted on January 14, 1917. 


Insect Migration in Floyd and Adjoining Counties of lowa. 


BY CARROLL LANE FENTON. 

On September 17, 1915, I noted a flock of Monarch butterflies 
(Anosia plexippus) resting in an oak grove west of Charles City, 
Iowa. The flock contained many thousands of individuals, and 
practically covered the trees for a considerable area. From time 
to time small numbers of the insects arrived from the north, and 
oceasionally fifty to one hundred would rise into the air and fly 
to the southeast. In general, though, there was no movement of 
the flock between the hours of one and five-thirty P. M. In order 
to form an estimate of the density with which the insects were 
crowded together I swept my net along a twig, and thirty-seven 
Monarchs made up the capture. 

Two days afterward I again visited the same locality, and found 
considerable numbers of Monarchs flying about over a near-by 
creek or resting on some willows or the lower branches of the oaks. 
Above the trees were large numbers of these butterflies, steadily 
flying to the southeast. With the Monarchs were a number of 
Clover Sulphurs (Colias philodice), these latter being particularly 
in evidence about the water. While I failed to make detailed 
observations each day, this migration apparently lasted until 
about the twenty-third of September. At no other time did I 
observe such large numbers of butterflies as I had noted on the 


14 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


first day, and after the twenty-third there was no noticeable evi- 
dence of migration, though Monarchs were not uncommon. 

In 1916 I saw large numbers of Monarchs on September 5, but 
the true migration did not start until the eleventh, and two days 
later I found thousands of the butterflies at the oak grove, with 
constant flights to the southeast. I at once went to a little, sunny 
valley some three and one-half miles to the southeast and there I 
found conditions comparable to those at the oak grove on Septem- 
ber 17 of the year before. The flock was almost entirely composed 
of Monarchs, and from a short distance many of the trees had the 


SWET CH-MAP 

SHOWING INSECT 

MIGRATION ROUTES 

in FLOYD ann CERRO GORDO} 
COUNTIES, lowa. 


@>=KNOWN LINES OF FLIGHT e 
PROBABLE LINES of FLIGHT| 


appearance of being in autumn colors, the butterflies were so 
thickly gathered. On and by the road over which I went to the 
valley I had seen large flocks of Colias philodice, with considerable 
numbers of Monarchs, but I was unable to determine whether or 
not the former were in actual migration. On September 16, I 
saw a large flock of Monarchs and Clover Sulphurs flying east and 
south, and with it were numerous individuals of the European 
Cabbage Butterfly (Pzeris rapae). I first saw this flock some two 
miles from the oak grove, and I was curious to know whether or 
not this flock, which was quite distinctly marked by the unusual 
presence of P. rapae, would rest at the grove. As I was walking, 
some forty minutes elapsed from the time when I first saw the 
butterflies and the time when I arrived at the desired locality. 
Here I found that there were numbers of Anosia plexippus, Colias 
philodice and also Prerts rapae, so in all probability the flock that I 


= AS rae cs phar 


INSECT MIGRATION 15 


had seen did stop at the grove. Apparently this is a regular and well 
recognized resting point with the migrating insects. 

I traced this course of flight several miles northwest and also 
about seven miles to the southeast of Charles City. It is well 
defined and as shown, is used by large numbers of insects. It 
is, however merely a local element of a larger route that roughly 
passes across almost the full widths of Floyd and Cerro Cordo 
Counties. 

In 1917 the Monarch migration began in the latter part of 
August, although the Sulphur migration did not commence until 
about the middle of September. On August 39, I observed a 
large and continuous flight of Monarchs at a point in the east- 
central portion of Cerro Gordo County. Here the butterflies 
skirted the lower portion of a seventy-foot bluff and at that point 
were flying almost due east but further investigation showed that 
as soon as this chain of hills disappeared the flight turned to the 
southeast. The next day I observed large numbers of Monarchs 
and Clover Sulphurs at a point about eight miles to the southeast 
of the point where I had noted the flight on the day before. It 
is notable that while this line of flight is some miles to the west of 
the one first described, it has the same general direction, both follow- 
ing the general trend of stream flow. 

At Charles City there were large numbers of migrating Monarchs 
on September 5, but the migration reached its height from the 
twelfth to the fifteenth, and on these latter days a considerable 
percentage of Colias was found in the flocks studied. At no time 
was Pieris rapae noted in any of the flocks, though the species 
was fully as abundant as usual. 

In none of the migrations have there been any indications that 
the same routes were used by birds or other insects, as for instance 
the dragonflies. Neither was any point noted where the path of 
migration became extremely narrow. In the spring, usually about 
the first of June, a few battered and weatherworn Monarchs appear, 
but there is no return of the Sulphurs. The Mourning Cloaks 
(Vanessa antiopa) often is found, in hibernated specimens, as early 
as April 1, and thus appears to be the earliest of the butterflies 
of that vicinity. 

The accompanying sketch-map gives the two main routes of 
butterfly migration in Floyd and Cerro Gordo Counties, as indi. 
cated by these studies. 


16 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 
My Favorite Song Bird. 


BY BROTHER ALPHONSUS, C. S. C. 

The question is often asked, ‘‘ What is your favorite song bird?”’ 
To the bird lover there are so many songsters that are his favorites 
that it is not always easy to answer this question. But if an answer 
must be given he will probably single out one that is dear to him 
for many reasons. Such a bird is the song sparrow. 

When February is drawing to a close occasionally there are a 
few fine days when the sun shines brightly, and- there is just a 
hint of the approaching spring. On such days those who are 
accustomed to take daily walks will surely hear what they may 
call ‘‘the first spring notes”’ of a bird, and this songster is the song 
sparrow. And when summer is losing its intense heat toward ,the 
end of August, and nearly every other note has died away, the 
sweet singer of late February will be true to his name and greet 
us with his cheery strain. 

It is probably the long song season of the song sparrow that 
contributes most to make him a favorite song bird with many 
nature lovers. And then his melody is one of the finest in the whole 
gamut of song that comes from the throats of birds. Besides great 
variety in the musical effort of this sparrow, there is an absence 
of the plaintive quality that is so marked a feature in the per- 
formances of many of our birds. These sad strains are especially 
noticeable in such species as the rose-breasted grosbeak, vesper 
sparrow, field sparrow and indigo bird. 

The nesting habits of the song sparrow are interesting to the 
student of bird life. It is possible that this species may have three 
broods, for young birds are fledged early in May, and nests with 
young in them may be found late in August. Many of the nests 
are built in the grass, not far from walks where people pass fre- 
quently. Last August I found a nest placed in a small sapling near 
the pier in St. Joseph’s Lake, at Notre Dame, where bathers cer- 
tainly made plenty of noise. The confiding character of the song 
sparrow is a trait that increases our love for the bird. 

When nearly all the birds of summer have departed, and the cold 
days of late autumn and early winter send a chill through our 
bodies, we can still find a few song sparrows on our walks. Now 
they are no longer in song, yet the memory of their singing remains. 


AN 
x 3 


Nyt 

yy 

j 
‘ 
4 


ve 


hate 4 ‘« 
tn ate 


Back Aliecbers of “The eae Midland Natal.” ne 


Vol. I.—(1909-1910) 293 p.. Unbound 0... ence eee nee je ORR EEA eae 
Vol. II (1911-1912): 330 pp. Unbound and exclusive of 3 Reprints — ; 
to be hound in.énd of Voloiupos eS EN ie ae 2.00 
Inclusive of Three Reprints (see below). Extra... -.--nete-ceeeecennennee 2.25 
Vol. III.—(1913-1914). 383 pp. Unbound, exclusive of Reprint No. 4. 
(See below). [Nos. 1, 2, 3, 7.) are scarce and nearly out of print, 
costing 50 cts, each. ..:- 5s A SO ican cee le pn care ae 4-508 hea le 
Inclusive of Reprint. No. 4, extra. ao. se lac oan este 1.00)" Gores 
Volo TV. (1915-1916). | Umbra ccc cae eae ec epee etre dtah vay Uae ecto 4-003 
. Vol. V. (1917-1918). Unbound).s..6.1.0-0 wage ony scat opt. 0 SAO re es 
} Total—817 WS hey ste 
Publications. ia et 
Haun, W. Analytic Study of Faunal Changes in Indians, 2 plate aid 
IQ1O;) 27> P pid cee a Re eee ee $15 : 
GREENE, E. L. Leaflets of Botanical Observation and Criticism. 2 
2 vols Complete. (1903-1912)......... ane Geese 6.00 M4 
+ nr Cybele Columbiana, A series of Studies in Botany, Arse ay 
chiefly North American. No. 1. (Other num- id 
bers:to follow)..4..06020 00 ee aa eee ‘75. tee 
? a Pittonia, A series of Papers Realting to Botany and oe ee 
Botanists, 5 vols. (1887—1905)---20-2-- ee eee LAOS ee 
as Flora Franciscana, Parts I, II, III. [Part IV pub- ; He 
lished long after the other parts, is quite Wipe 
unobtainable, as all copies not immediately ai eA 
distributed seem to have been lost in a the San se 
Francisco fire.} | Price as published_2 2... 2.00° — Ney 
uv * Manual of the Botany of the Region of San Fran- eee, 
cisco Bay (1894). Bound clothi.2 0000. 2,00... teu 
Unbound 2c oT ee eae see eae 1,jQ) th ae 
(Price as published of latter) .2.20. 02 2.00 aol 
UTTERBACK, W. I. Naiades of Missouri, 200 pp. 29 pl and some text. 
figuress3 200) ete ee ae SEP YR Ske ag oh, Sa a e 'T.75 
BW I ee lage - : j ( phe 
Reprints. Ret Sa 1p 
RAFINESQUE, C..S: — Neovenyton), (1825) 222 2 ee ee GLhas 
si ba The Natural Family of the Carexides (1840)... .50 ny 
as ss Seadiography or 100 Genera of Ombelliferous  - . 
Plants: ete... (184) 0 ee eS ee 1.50 ‘ 
ey fg Monographie des Coquilles Bivalves et Fluvia- 


tiles de la Riviere Ohio. Remarques sur les 

Rapports Naturels des Genres Viscum, Samolus 

et Viburnum. A Bruxelles (1820) ..202.0s. 1.50 
LECONTE, J. B. Reprints of Monographs without plates, $2.50; with 

42 photographie copies of unpublished plates 

(7x8), $25.00; with colored photographic plates...$37.50 
LECONTE, J. E. Two extra plates reproduced from originals in N. Y. 

Bot. Garden. Colored, $1.50; uncolored_..........- 1.00 


> a a 


. a 


VoL. VI. MARCH, 1919 Ra 


witty MIDLAND 
‘NATURALIST 


Devoted to Natural History, Primarily 
that of the Prairie States 


Published by the University of Notre Dame, 


Notre Dame, Indiana 


J. A. NIEUWLAND, C.S.C., Ph. D., Sc. D., Editor Smitha 


CONTENTS =— 
The Missouri Muhlenbergias senjamin Franklin Bush 17 
Book Review J. Lunell 29 
PRICE $1.50 A YEAR SINGLE NUMBERS 30 CENTS 


FOREIGN, 6s. 6d. 


Entered as second-class matter at Notre Dame, Indiana. Acceptance for mailing at special 
rate of postage provided for in section 1103, Act of October 3, 1917, 
authorized on July 3, 1918. 


THE UNIVERSITY PRESS, NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


- Contributions on gebtral and midland — natural 
history will be gladly received. Papers on botany — 
and allied subjects, zoology, geology and physical 
geography, should be addressed to the editor. 

. Matters relating .to advertisements are to. be 
taken up with the secretary of the University. 

One hundred reprints of articles averaging . 
eight pages or more will be furnished free of charge 
to contributors. More than one hundred separates can 
be obtained at cost price of the extras. When articles cee 
consist of less than eight pages, a_ certain number — g Lea 
of copies of THe AMERICAN MipLanp NATURALIST in 
which the paper appeared will be supplied free, or 
the separate articles may, by arrangement with the — 
editor, be kept until future papers average eight pages, 
provided the contributions are sent in for the next 
consecutive issue for - publication. Contributors of 
articles will receive a free subscription for the year | 
in which their paper appears. For further or other 
information address — 2h, 

THE Epiror, Notre Dame, Indiana 


SAR RRR SR RR i 


CARR CRABALA Sa Sa Ca Sash 


Sa OR EES EP EEE UE RIE << : 


Original Old Books. 


ENGELMANN, G. Cactaceae of the Mexican Boundary (1758) Survey. 
75 beautiful plates. 78 pp. ~Bound separate...s.-0 25.218 $2550 ~ 


Write for information. 


Duplicates for Sale 


PAXTON’S MAGAZINE OF Botany, London, 1834-1840; 1843-1846. 
Vols. 1-7, -ro-r2 inclusive: ~ 1¢ volumes. Numerous hand- 
colored illustrations, exquisitely finished, beautifully bound in 
half leather, tooled in gold. Not much worn. (Vv ol. 7 in cloth.) 
Net,-$1:50: per *vGlimes at Of ak et See es $15.00. 


The American Midland Naturalist 


PUBLISHED BI-MONTHLY BY THE UNIVERSITY 
OF NOTRE DAME, NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


VOL. VI. MARCH, 1919. NO. 2. 


The Missouri Muhlenbergias. fo rn 
aa JUN 7 


BY BENJAMIN FRANKLIN BUSH. 


ee 


Any one in recent years attempting to name speci 
MUHLENBERGIA by the books, must have been struck by the wide 
difference of opinion in the presentation of the species in the 
Robinson and Fernald Gray’s New Manual, and the Britton and 
Brown Illustrated Flora. This difference of cpinion in treating 
the species of this genus in some cases is so marked as to cause one 
to wonder if there is not something wrong with our understanding 
of the species. This difference of opinion is most marked with the 
members of the Mexicana group, a most perplexing and critical 
one, the species of which present so many variations in culms, 
leaves and floral characters. 

It was formerly thought that the species of this, and those of the 
Acroxis group, were either awned or awnless, this belief causing 
much confusion in the treatment of the species and the naming of 
specimens: but it began to be suspected that those species which 
were habitually awnless sometimes presented awned forms, and 
those species that were ordinarily awned, sometimes presented 
awnless forms. This suspicion was first voiced by Scribner, who 
announced that M. Mexicana and M. SOBOLIFERA often or 
occasionally presented awned forms, and he went so far as to 
describe awned forms of these species,? and noted that M. TENuI- 
FLORA and M. ToRREYI were occasionally awnless. 

My conclusions after a careful examination of several hundred 
sheets of specimens, are, that Scribner was correct in the main, but 
that what he took to be awned forms or varieties of M. MEXICANA 
and M. SOBOLIFERA are really good distinct species, which I herein 
propose as new. 


* Scribner, Rhodora 9:18. 1907. ? Scribner, Rhodora 9:18. 1907. 


18 . ‘THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 

Hitchcock in the Robinson and Fernald Gray’s New Manual 
in 1908, presented ten species and one variety for the territory 
commonly embraced in the Manual region, presenting M. FOLIOSA 
Trinius, for the first time, this having been previously restored 
by Scribner,t and to it he referred M. ampicua Torrey, which I 
am inclined to think is a good species. M. MExicana is there said 
to have the culms retrorsely strigose below the nodes, and to have 
the lemmas acuminate or awned, thus including the M. Mexicana 
~commuTata of Scribner in his description. It appears to me much 
better to consider Scribner’s variety a distinct species, and thus 
relieve the real M. Mexicana of much uncertainty. Hitchcock 
also includes M. potystacHya of Mackenzie and Bush in M. 
Mexicana, which after an examination of a number of specimens 
I still consider distinct from that species. He reduces M. PALUSTRIS 
to a variety of M. SCHREBERI, a disposition once made by Scribner,? 
but it seems more natural to keep this distinct from that species. 
The description of M. SCHREBERI is so drawn as to include M. 
SCHREBERI CURTISETOSA of Scribner, which seems to me to be 
sufficiently distinct to recognize as a species. M. GLABRIFLORA 
of Scribner is not mentioned in the Manual, Hitchcock evidently 
not understanding this species. 

Nash in the Britton and Brown Illustrated Flora, second edition, 


in 1913, presents eleven species, ten of these given by Hitchcock - 


in the Manual, and one other, M. ampicua Torrey. In the treat- 
ment of the species in this work, Nash gives specific rank to M. 
PALUSTRIS and M. AmBiGcua, refers M. FoLIosA of ‘Trinius to M. 
MexIcANA, ignores M. poLtysTacHya of Mackenzie and Bush, 
and M. SCHREBERI CURTISETOSA, and briefly mentions M. GLABRI- 
FLORA which seems to me to be an excellent species. In his description 
of the MEXICANA group, Nash does not speak of the retrorsely 
scabrous character of the culms just below the nodes of some 
of the species, evidently thinking this character not worthy of 
mention. 

Many years ago Prof. Dewey wrote the account of the Grasses 
for the Manual of the Plants of Western Texas,’ in which the ranges 
of some of our species is given, no doubt based on specimens in the 
Herbarium of the Department of Agriculture. The ranges given 
of several of our species in this work has been modified largely by 


’ Scribner, Rhodora 9:18. 1907. * Scribner, Rhodora 9/18. 1907. | 
3 Dewey, Man. of the Plants of Western Texas, 1892. 


rr’. een esa it eee atonal 


1 


\ 
MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS 19 


numerous collections and critical study of several species. _ Prior 
to 1905, several of the species now included in the genus MUHLEN- 
BERGIA, were included in the genus Sporobolus, when Dr. Rydberg" 
transferred some of the species to this genus. These species seem 
to me to be intermediate between MUHLENBERGIA and Sporobolus, 


~ and could with equal propriety be included in the genus Sporobolus 


or in MUHLENBERGIA, but I leave these species in MUHLENBERGIA 
as placed there by Dr. Rydberg. But there is a group of species 
having single, terminal panicles with flowers on long capillary 
pedicels, the type of which is Stzpa capillaris Lamarck, that seems 
to me to be very distinct from the other species commonly included 
in the genus MUHLENBERGIA. This group of species is so distinct 
from the other species of MUHLENBERGIA in. rootstocks, ligules, 
panicles, flowers and habit, that I think there is no doubt that 
they are certainly distinct from that genus. The earliest available 
name for this group of species seems to be PoposEMuM Des- 
vaux, in “Nouv. Bull. Soc. Philom. 2:188. 1810, where the 
genus is established and Sizpa capillaris Lamarck is cited as the- 
type. The genus is more fully described in Beauvois Agrost. 29, 
1812. 

I have therefore decided to follow Desvaux in placing some of 
the species formerly included in the genus MUHLENBERGIA in the 
genus PoDOSEMuM, but present the single species occurring in the 
State along with the other species of MUHLENBERGIA, to which it 
has generally been referred. 

In this, my presentation of the Missouri species, I differ some- 
what from the treatment of both Hitchcock and Nash, in the 
works mentioned above, and have more nearly agreed with Scribner 
in recognizing the species, and have been compelled to describe 
one new species, being unable to refer the specimens to any de- 
scribed species. 

I have seen nearly all the Missouri material in existence of the 
species of MUHLENBERGIA, through the kindness of Dr. J. M. 
Greenman, curator of the Missouri Botanical Garden Herbarium, 
Prof. A. S. Hitchcock, Agrostologist in charge of the Grasses 
in the United States National Museum Herbarium, Prof. Wm. 
Trelease of the University of Illinois, Dr. J. A. Nieuwland of the 
University of Notre Dame, and Mr. Kenneth K. Mackenzie of East 
Orange, New Jersey, to whom I am under ‘many obligations; 

' Rydberg, Bull. Torr. Club, 32:1905. 


t 


20 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


to Prof. Hitchcock and Dr. George T. Moore of the Missouri 
Botanical Garden, I am under obligations for numerous citations 
furnished and for verifications of publications; to all of the above 
I herein return thanks for the many courtesies extended. 

For the Missouri species now included, or were formerly included, 
in the genus MUHLENBERGIA, I offer the following: 


KEY TO THE MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS. 


Panicles contracted, narrow, often numerous, often slender, 
the branches short, erect or appressed; ligules usually short or 
minute. 1. MUHLENBERGIA. 

Panicles open, single, terminal, very large, their branches long 
and spreading, slender, the pedicels hair-like, drooping; ligules 
elongated; lemmas with long awns. 2. PODOSEMUM. 

1. MUHLENBERGIA SCHREBER; Gmelin, Syst. Nat. 2:171. 1791. 

A genus of about 30 species, mostly American, a few Asiatic, 
divisible into several rather well-marked groups, the type-species 
MUHLENBERGIA SCHREBERI Gmelin. As here treated, the species 
naturally fall into four groups or sections as follows: 

Glumes wanting, minute or very short, or in one species a little 
longer, blunt or obtuse or in one species acuminate; plants decum- 


bent at the base, from weak or slender rootstocks; lemmas usually - 


long-awned or in one species rather short-awned. 


A. MUHLENBERGIA proper. 
Glumes broad, ovate, acute, much shorter than the lemmas; 
lemmas acute or awned; rootstocks stout, scaly. 
B. STENOCLADIUM section. - 
Glumes narrow, acuminate or aristate, nearly as long as or 
exceeding the lemmas in length; rootstocks stout, scaly. 
C. Acroxis section. 
Glumes broad, cuspidate; panicle very much contracted, narrow; 
plants without rootstocks. 
D. EucLADIUM section. 
A, MUHLENBERGIA proper. 


Glumes less than one-fourth the length of the spikelets, minute 
or wanting, blunt or obtuse; lemmas with awns 3-5mm. long; 
rootstocks rather weak. 1. MUHLENBERGIA SCHREBERI. 


en Oe 


we 


MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS 2 


Glumes one-fourth to one-half as long as the spikelets, ovate- 
acuminate; lemmas with awns 1-2 mm. long; rootstocks much 
stouter. 2. MUHLENBERGIA CURTISETOSA. 


B. STENOCLADIUM section. 


1. Spikelets 1.5-2mm. long; lemmas awnless; infranodes' 
minutely scabrous just below the glabrous nodes; glumes two- 
thirds to three-fourths as long as the scabrous lemmas, ovate to 
broadly lanceolate, cuspidate. 3. MUHLENBERGIA SOBOLIFERA. 

1. Spikelets 2.5-4mm. long; lemmas awned or rarely awnless; 
glumes lanceolate or broadly lanceolate. 2. 


‘ 2. Spikelets 2.5-3mm. long; infranodes glabrous; nodes 
glabrous; culms low, much-branched; panicles numerous, upper 
usually short-exserted; awns 3-4mm. long. 

4. MUHLENBERGIA BRACHYPHYLLA. 


2. Spikelets 3-4mm. long; infranodes retrorsely pubescent; 
nodes pubescent; culms usually tall, little branched; panicles 
usually few, usually long-exserted; glumes very broad, ovate- 
‘lanceolate, cuspidate, scabrous, clasping, one-half to two thirds 
as long as the scabrous slender lemmas; lemmas usually with long 
awns, rarely awn-pointed or awnless; awns 5-1omm. long. 

5. MUHLENBERGIA TENUIFLORA. 


C. ACROXIS section. 


1. Glumes much exceeding the lemmas, generally twice as long, 
about 5mm. long, awned-acuminate; lemmas acuminate-attenuate. 
6. MUHLENBERGIA RACEMOSA: 


1. Glumes about as long as the lemmas, or slightly longer, 
or mostly a little shorter, less than 5mm. Jong, glabrous or rarely 
slightly scabrous. 2. 


2. Panicles ovoid or subpyramidal, or sometimes linear, num- 
erous, short-exserted, or partially included in the upper sheaths 
not dense nor glomerate-flowered. 3. 


2. Panicles oblong or cylindrical, or sometimes linear, more 
or less glomerate, or sometimes loosely flowered. 5. 


3. Panicles numerous, rather long, more or less open; lemmas 
long-awned. 7. MUHLENBERGIA COMMUTATA. 


© 


The term infranode is here employed to designate that portion of the 
culm just below the node, corresponding to the upper part of the internode. 


22 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


3. Panicles numerous, rather short, somewhat dense or more 
or less open; lemmas not awned. 4. 


4. Panicles numerous, rather short, more or less dense; lemmas 
not awned, perfectly glabrous. 8. MUHLENBERGIA GLABRIFLORA 


4. Panicles numerous, more or less open, often slender; lemmas 
not awned, pubescent at the base; infranodes perfectly smooth; 
nodes glabrous. 9. MUHLENBERGIA MEXICANA. 


5. Panicles few, short, dense, glomerate, oblong or cylindrical; 
flowers usually purplish; lemmas awn-pointed or somewhat 
aristate; glumes mucronate or aristate, subequal; infranodes 
retrorsely scabrous: nodes glabrous. 
10. MUHLENBERGIA FOLIOSA. 

5. Panicles numerous or sometimes fewer, filiform, linear or 
oblong, dense or rather loose. 6. 


6. Panicles usually few, usually short-exserted, linear or fili- 
form; infranodes retrorsely scabrous; nodes glabrous; flowers 
not crowded, in rather long, erect branches, usually green or 
stramineous; spikelets 2.5-3mm. long; lemmas usually long- 
awned, or rarely awnless. 11. MUHLENBERGIATORREYVI. 


6. Panicles numerous, dense, slender, elongated, usually long- 
exserted; infranodes minutely scabrous or nearly glabrous; lem- 
mas acuminate, rarely awned, villous with very long hairs at the 
base; spikelets 2-2.5mm. long. 12. MUHLENBERGIA POLYSTACHYA. 


D. EucLabDiIuM section nova. 


Culms strictly erect, not rooting at the lower nodes, minutely 
retrorsely puberulent; glumes broad, one-half as long as the spike- 
let or more, acuminate or cuspidate; lemmas awnless, long-acum-. 
inate or cuspidate; no creeping scaly rootstocks; panicles slender, 
the branches appressed. 13. MUHLENBERGIA CUSPIDATA. 

1. MUHLENBERGIA SCHREBERI J. F. Gmelin, Syst. Nat. 2:171. 
L701. 

Muhlenbergia diffusa Willd. Sp. Pl. 1:320. 1798. 

Dilepyrum minutiflorum Michx. Fl. Bor. Am. 1:40. 1803. 

Muhlenbergia diffusa Schreber, Gram. 2:143, 1810. 

Muhlenbergia diffusa Schreb., Bush in Flora of Jackson County, 
Missouri, No. 864, 1885; Tracy in Flora of Missouri, No 1641, 
1886; Eggert in Catalogue of Plants of Saint Louis, Missouri, 1891; 
Daniels in Flora of Columbia, Missouri, No. 75, 1907; Palmer in 


- MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS 23 


Catalogue of Plants of Jasper County, Missouri, Nos. 988, 990 


and 3488, 1916. 


Muhlenbergia diffusa Willd., Mackenzie and Bush in Manual 
of the Flora of Jackson County, Missouri, No. 6, 1902. 

Muhlenbergia Schrebert J. F. Gmelin, Palmer in Catalogue of 
Plants of Jasper County, Missouri, Nos. 1376, 2646 and 2894, 1916. 

Northern Texas and northward, Dewey in Manual of the Plants 
of Western Texas. 

Me. to Ont. Minn. and southward, Hitchcock in Manual. 

Me. and southern Ontario to Minn. Fla. Kans. and Texas, 
Nash in Flora. ~ 

Me. to Minn. south to Fla. and Texas, Nash in Illustrated 
Flora. : 

Massachusetts to Nebraska, south to Florida, Texas and Mexico. 


SPECIMENS EXAMINED: 
MASSACHUSETTS: 


Amherst, Gzrard 40, 1872, M. B. G. Herb. No. 80109; 
Farmington, Smith, September, 1897, M. B. G. Herb. No 


79741. 
NEw YORK: 


Buffalo, Clinton, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. N. 79859; 

Pennyan, Sartwell, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79625, the plant marked 1 on this sheet; 

Pennyan, Sartwell, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79582, the plant marked 1 on this sheet. 


NEW JERSEY: 


Hoboken, collector and date not given, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79991; 

Hoboken, collector and date not given, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79989; | 

Hoboken, collector and date not given, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79974; ; 

Hoboken, collector and date not given, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79889; 

Pemberton, Wallmarth, August 25, 1876, U. S. Herb.; 

Without definite locality, Digyn, date not given, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 79974. 


24 


THE AMERICAN MIDILAND NATURALIST 
PENNSYLVANIA: 
Manayunk, Redfield, September 19, 1870, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79858; 
Philadelphia, Digyn, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. 
" No. 79887; 
Philadelphia, Scribner 313, October, 1881, U. Ill. Herb.; 
Stoneroad’s Mill, Keller, October 5, 1901, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79868; 
West Chester, W. D., date not given, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79773; 
Without definite locality, Sartwell, date not given. 
eM. B. G., Herb. No. 79776; 
York County, Glatfelter, September, 1899, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 80096; 
MARYLAND: 


Chevy Chase, Mosher, September 15, 1915, U. Ill. Herb.; 

Harper’s Ferry, Holm, October 6, 1912, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 779204. 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: 

Great Falls of the Potomac, Holm, October, 1913, U. Ill. 
Herb.; Pine Branch, Ball 54, August 25, 1909, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 79872. 

OHIO: 

Cincinnati, Lloyd 575, September 9, 1890, M. B. G. Herb. 

No. 79885. : 
VIRGINIA: 

Loudoun County, Helms, August, 1888, U. Ill. Herb.; 

Munden, Mackenzie 1764, September 3-19, 1905, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 79843.; 

‘TENNESSEE; 

Knoxville, Ruth 59, September, 1898, M. B. G. Herb. No 

79867. 
KENTUCKY: 

Bowling Green, Price, June 1890, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79847; 

Bowling Green, Price, May, 1897, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79846. 

Wasiota, Kearney 383, September, 1893, M. B. G. Herb, 
No. 79992. 


ILLINOIS: 


Herb. No. 739941; 

St. Clair County, Eggert, 
Herb. No. 739683. 

St. Clair County, Eggert, 
Herb. No. 739391; 

St Clair County, Eggert, 
Herb. No. 79851; 

St. Clair County, Eggert, 
Herb. No. 79841; 

St. Clair County, Eggert, 
Herb. No. 79854; 


Sentenuer 
September 
September 
September 


September 


MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS 


Li 177; 
LY to7 7; 
Bh to Oe 
is SNS Ui Eg 


M5, 177; 


Lisle, Umbach, July 4, 1896, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
Mascoutah, Welsch, 1862-1871, U. Ill. Herb.; 
Mount Carmel, Schneck, September 15, 1904, U. Il. 
Peoria, Brendel, date not given, U. Ill. Herb.; 


St. Clair County, Eggert, September 11, 1877, M. 


Taylorville, Andrews, August 28, 1898, U. Ill. Herb; 
Urbana, Gtbbs, September 26, 1898, U. Ill. Herb; 

Urbana, G. P. C. October 1, 1895,.U. Ill. Herb: 
Urbana, Seymour, September 28, 1880, U. Ill. Herb. 
Wabash County, Schneck, July, 1900, U. Ill, Herb; 
Wabash County, Schneck, date not given, U. Ill. Herb.; 
Wady Petra, Chase 1165, September 25, 1904, U. Ill. Herb.; 
Wady Petra, Chase 1270, September 23, 1906, U. Ill. Herb.; 
Wady Petra, Chase 1277, Octcber 7, 1906, U. Ill. Herb.; 
Wady Petra, Chase 682, October 7, 1906, M. B. G. Herb. 


25 


No. 80128. 
MISSOURI: * 
?, Aberdeen, Davis 1147, September 24, 1911, M. B. G. Herb. 
" No. 709388; 
: Allenton, Letterman, August 30, 1892, M. B. G. Herb. 
: No. 709388; 
Campbell, Bush, September 11, 1893, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 772800 
Carterville, Palmer 1984, July 8, 1901, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 757390; 
Carthage, Trelease, September 18, 1998, M. B. G. Herb, 


No. 79864; 


26 


THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Cedar County, Trelease, July 30, 1897 M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79862; 

Clayton, Letterman, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. No 
796012; 

Cliff Cave, Kellogg 30, October 10, 1901, U. S. Herb. No. 
950188; 

Cliff Cave, Kellogg, October 10, 1901, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79798; 

Congo, Hoffman, October 10, 1916; 

Dodson, Hoffman, September 13, 1916; 

Dunklin County, Trelease, August 20, 1897, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79861; 

Eolia, Davis 1435, October 23, 1911, U.S. Herb. No. 674025; 

Eolia, Davis 1435, October 23, 1911, M. B. G. Herb. No 
709445; 

Forest Park, Eggert, September 21, 1875, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79855; 

Galena, Palmer 6481, October 16, 1913, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 717420; 

Galloway, Standley 9345, August 26, 1912, U. S. Herb. 
No. 688260; 

Greene County Blankinship 2821, July 29, 1889, M. B. G. 
Herb, No. 80047; 

Indian Hill, Trelease, September 28, 1897, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79863; 

Jackson County, Bush, September 27, 1893, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 80049; 

Jefferson County, Eggert, September 9, 1896, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79849; 

Jerome, Kellogg, 184, October 1, 1913, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
719727; 

Martin City, Mackenzie 482, September 18, 1901; 

McDonald County, Bush September 1, 1893, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 80046; 

Monteer, Bush 4888, October 10, 1907, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79831; 

Oronogo, Palmer, 988, September 15, 1907, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 757385; 

Oronogo, Palmer 988, September 15, 1907, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79828; ~ 


MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS 2h 


Prosperity, Palmer 990, August 20, 1907, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 757389; 

Prosperity, Palmer 990, August 20, 1907, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79827; ; 

Silica, Eggert, September 15, 1891, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79851; ; 

South St.- Louis, Kellogg, September 7, 1900, M. B. G. 
Herb. Na. 79877; 

Springfield, Standley, 9728, August 31, 1912, U. S. Herb. 
No. 688645; 
St. Louis, Eggert, October, 1875, M. B. G. Herb. No. 82696; 
St. Louis Engelmann, August 1841,, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79688; 
St. Louis, Glatjelter, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
80060; : 

St. Louis, Pammel, October, 1886, M. B. G. Herb. No 
79842; 

Stone County Trelease, September 10, 1898, M. B. G. 

Herb. No. 79865; 

Sugar Creek, Mackenzie, September 6, 1896; 

Swan, Bush, 380, September 24, 1899, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79857; ; 

Thornton, Mackenzie 656, October 18, 1901, M. B. G. 
No. 79865; 

Turner, Standley 8794, September 4, 1912, U. S. Herb. 
No. 687669; 

Webb City, Palmer 1376, June 7, 1908, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 757388; 

Webb City, Palmer 2646, September 8, 1909, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 80063; 

Webb City, Palmer 2646, September 8, 1909, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 757391; 

Webb City, Palmer 3488, October 7, 1911, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 709005 ; 

Webb City, Palmer 3488, October 7, 1911, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 757386; 

Whiteside, Davis 28, September 12, 1911 M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 765895; 

Whiteside, Davis 1008, September 12, 1911 M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 673927; 3 


THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Whiteside, Davis 1008, September 12, 1911, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 709063; 


NORTH CAROLINA: 


Aiken, Ravenel, September, 1866, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79691. 


IOWA: 


Ames, Pammel 73, August, 1909, M. B. G. Herb. No. 80074; 

Clinton, Pammel 247, September 4, 1896, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79980; 

Clinton, Pammel 247, September 4, 1896, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79850; 

College Park, Johnson, October 1898, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79884; 

Columbus Junction, Pammel 1502, date not given ,M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 79876; 

Des Moines, Pammel 653, July 14, 1897, M. B. G. Herb. 


No. 79848; 

DeWitt, Pammel 1455, September 9, 1898, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79874; 

Dixon, Snyder 735, September 23, 1897, M. B. G. Herb. 
No 79882; 


Iowa City, Hitchcock, 1888, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79879; 

Iowa City, Hitchcock, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79983; 

Iowa City, Hitchcock, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. No 
79982; 

Iowa City, Hitchcock, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79746; 

Mount Ayr, Beard 642, September 25, 1907, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 79722; 

Mount Pleasant, Witte 993, ‘October I, , 1897, Mir Baaee 
Herb. No. 79881; 

Muscatine, Mackenzie 749, September 10, 1894. 


NEBRASKA: 


Bellevue, Hayden, July, 1853-54, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79690; 


GEORGIA: 


Leslie, Harper 1716, October 7, 1902, M. B. G. Herb. No. 


79869; | 
(To be continued.) 


Ay eee 


BOOK REVIEW 29 


Book Review. 


BY J. LUNELL. 

The Sixth Biennial Report of the Director of the Agricultural 
College Soil and Geological Survey of North Dakota to the Governor 
of North Dakota (1911-1912) by Herbert A. Hard. Chapter XI: 
Plant Survey of Barnes County by H. F Bergman. Chapter XII: 
Flora of North Dakota by H. F. Bergman. 

In briefly reporting these publications written by an author 
who professes views often diametrically opposed to my own I 
would feel sorry if some reader considered this paper a missile from 
enemy trenches intending to hurt. Nor is it a peace message. 
By all means I wish it to be permeated by a spirit of fairness. 

I shall not repeat what I have said once before about the vital 
defects of plant surveys. I am glad that they are abolished within 
our state. There are more sensible, quicker and less expensive 
methods for exploring the flora of a land area. The catalogue of 


‘Barnes County plants in chapter XI. is as complete as can be 


expected from the few seconds or minutes spent on each different 
square yard of its surface, perhaps never to be visited again, and no 
fault can be found with the collector. 

I can not refrain here from calling attention to many incon- 
sistencies or discrepancies, not to say contradictions, to be found 
in the nomenclature adopted in chapters XI and XII. As the report 
evidently is written not only for afew botanists of the state, but for 
any and all of our interested citizens, no matter what standing 
they occupy, one name for the same plant ought to have been 
preferred, and if this were thought insufficient, synonyms ought 
to have been added parenthetically. Such uniformity ought to 
have been welcome to the readers and facilitate their efforts to 
master the contents of the book. The more liberal views in chapter 
XI have a tendency of becoming narrowed down “‘to the first 
principles’? in chapter XII as f. i. Potamogeton richardsonii to 
P. perfoliatus, Alisma subcordatum to A. plantago-aquatica, Salicornia 
herbacea to S. europaea, Atriplex ovata to A. suckleyana, Salsola tragus 
to S. kali, Delphinium albescens to D. penardi, Prunus melanocarpa 
to P. virginiana, Viola scabriuscula to V. pubescens, and Viola 
subvestita to V.adunca. Here we find that the perferred name in 
chapter XI is the synonym in chapter XII, while only one name is 


/ 
30 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


given in chapter XI. Two species in Chapter XI have often been 
reduced to one in chapter XII: Dondia depressa and erecta to D. 
depressa, Actaea rubra and eburnea to A. rubra, Crataegus chrysocarpa 
and rotundifolia to C. chrysocarpa, Kuhnistera candida and olig- 
ophyllato Petalostemon candidus. A floral ‘‘ melting pot”’ established 
merely in part is undesirable. Contradictions are by ne means 
rare: Onosmodium molle Michx. of chapter XI has (correctly) 
been called O. occidentale in chapter XII, where it is told also that 
this is not O. molle Michx: still the Barnes County plant belongs 
here, as the genus has only one species within the state. Other 
specics regarding which “‘to be or not to be is the question,” are: 
Lepidium apetalum Willd. (Chapter XI) and L. apetalum authors, 
not Willd. (Chapter XII): Atriplex hastata L. (chapter XII) and 
A. carnosa Nels. (A. hastata Am. authors not L. (chapter XII); 
Smilax herbacea 1,. (chapter XII) and Nemexia pulverulenta (S. 
herbacea Am. authors) in chapter XI; Viola canadensis I,. (chapter 
XI) and V. rugulosa Greene (V. canadensis auth. not L.) in chapter 
XII. Another group of plants is not mentioned in chapter XII, i. e. 
they are not supposed to grow in North Dakota while they are 
enumerated in chapter XI as Barnes County plants: Eguisetum 
variegaium, Thalictrum dioicum, Xanthium speciosum, Antennaria 
campestris (though perhaps this species has been dumped in the 
melting pot and was meant as a part of A. neglecta in chapter XI1) 
and Helianthus strumosus. We do not attempt to solve this mystery. 

The following remarks are to be applied exclusively to chapter 
XII (the flora). A lamentable defect with the work is that it does 
not report the total number of plants known within the state up 
to the date of publication (1917). A check list (of 1912?) containing 
962 numbers can be considered its precursor. Based on this list, 
though with many additions and exclusions, the revised flora was 
emitted, but the origina] number of 962 was retained (if my count 
is correct). A conservative estimate would add at least 25 per 
cent to this number, even if all proposed new species and varieties 
were to suffer an indiscriminate universal slaughter, as the retained 
old species mainly would fill the vacancies. 

Such author names as Greene, Rydberg; Aven Nelson, Fernald, 
representing as brilliant stars on the botanical firmament as the 
Polar Star in the space, (Stella Polaris nescit occasum) are conspic- 
uous by their scarcity or absence or misapplication (analogy 
lucus a non lucendo.) 


+e } os ee See 


ie 


BOOK REVIEW 31 


In recording localities the short method applied for Ranunculus 


- Cymbalaria and Brassica juncea is commendable. The term. 


“Throughout the state’? ought to have been used for all those 
common plants found everywhere by everyone. 

Giving in most cases a large number of localities and crediting 
the collectors is just as much waste, the more culpable during 
times when the federal administration instructs its employees to 
save paper. The records for most other plants not belonging to 
this class are numerous and the more valuable as so many of 
them have their place in history. When the war came, what 
little of the virgin prairie was left had to be utilized for grain pro- 
duction and pasturing of beef cattle, and very little ground beside 
the section lines was left as a refuge for the wild flowers. 

I shall not raise any quarrel by dropping adverse remarks that 
signify my individual views regarding the preferred species names. 
Nor shall I resent that among the plants collected by me and for 
which I have been credited in the flora, a not trifling number has 
been passed under names not at all attributable to me. I shall only 
mention critically a few particulars. 

Malva rotundifolia 1., as described in the key, is identical with 
the plant bearing that name in American manuals. M. rotundifolia 
L. in European floras comes very near to or is identical with the M. 
borealis of the key. It is an intricate proposition to decide which 
view is right or wrong. 

Steironema membranaceum Greene is areenied only by the 
type at the University of Notre Dame, Ind., and in my herbarium. 
The Pleasant Lake specimen of 1912 was prpneolsy. distributed 
under this name. 

Dracocephalum Nuttallit (Physostegia parviflora). If somebody 
wishes to reduce P. formosior to synonymy, he at least ought to 
connect it with P. wrginiana, not with this species! 

Fragaria virginiana Duch. Why not as well take the full step 
and call it F. vesca L. and avoid the anxiety and worry we other 
poor fellows have experienced in trying to master a delicate differ- 
entiation between proposed species? 

Oxytropis. Almost all our species have been reduced to synonymy 
under Aragallus Lamberti, and there is poor reason then to exempt 
A. monticola from a similar fate. This would be accomplished by 
making the floral limit 12-25mm. (in place of 16-25mm.) and dis- 
regard the color difference which is not respected anyway, subse- 


32 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


quently in the text allotted to the species. Our genus would be 
confined to two lilliputian species, A. deflexus and A. splendens, 
and one giant A. Lamberti, all with splendid differential limits, 
and it would be a more perfect system. A beautiful card-castle of 
proposed species torn down at the same time would add to the 
“victory,” but this calamity ought not to disturb the sleep of the 
just. . 

Xanthium. ‘“Interdum dormitat bonus Brittonus’’ most likely 
thought Dr. Bergman when he found that Dr. Britton, who had 
only one native species in his Ill. F., had allowed 7 additional 
native species to slip into his manual. This rate of admittance of 
specics no doubt was too fast to win Dr. Bergman’s approval, 
and he took a middle course in his flora, admitting just 2 speci s: 
1) X. canadense (which assimilated X. Pennsylvanicum); and -2) 
X. echinatum which included X. glanduliferum, and at the same 
time he mustered into service under said name a specimen 
of X. speciosum collected by me at Minot Aug. 20, 1905. X. com- 
mune and X. acerosum have not even received an honorable mention 
but they would in all probability bave been incorporated with 
X. echinatum. 

Arnica tulgens Pursh. The name of the Dakota plant is correctly 
A. pedunculato Rydb. or A. monocephala Rydb. 

Alisma brevipes Greene (A. superbum Lunell). The synonymy was 
proposed, if I am not mistaken, in the N. Am. Flora and adopted 
in Rydb. Rocky Mt. Flora and in this report. The outside world 
has net yet seen the real type of my A. superbum. It is in my 
herbarium and will be open to inspection under certain conditions. 

Potamogeton pectinatus. ‘The specimen cited from Lake Ibsen is 
P. Friesit, and I can not imagine how it was labeled otherwise. 

Avena Torreyt Nash. Known since the beginning of this cen- 
tury also from the Devil’s Lake Chatauqua grounds, where it has 
been collected by me repeatedly. 

If asked for my impression of the botanical part of this report 
I venture to say this: While teaming with an abundance of knowl- 
edge amassed from the year of 1753 until the first part of this 
century, it has either from waning interest in the subject or from 
difficulties in reaching the material to be studied, or on account 
of its author’s removal from this botanical field—not paid sufficient 
attention to the notable advances of the latest years. 

Leeds, North Dakota. 


Back Ninabers of “The hacicss Midland Naturalis.” me 


Vol. Ttpeos etek 2903p. RS Wie Sie Peta © alow eeosen ae Ay shite 2.00 | 

Vol. Il.—(1ig911-1912). 330 pp. Unbound and paclidiee of 3 Reprints ik 
to be bound in end of VOL eneerenevnectitetstieieeeeeenntaagetneecnon necteenenaon apes 200%. 
Inclusive of Three Reprints (see below). Extra... ..-2c-2.-20t eeeeeteeen nee 25. 3 ¥ 

Vol. III.—(1913-1914). 383 pp. Unbound, exclusive of Reprint No. 4. pis 
(See below). [Nos. 1, 2, 3, 7.) are scarce and nearly out of print, 


costing ko -cts.-eadh...202 = See abe ee SRA SO AvSOS.2% 
Inclusive of Reprint No.4, extra... i.cee elie eters shee 1.00 
Vol. 1V.—(1915-1916). Unbound... ee ceeectcn eck eence cence eceedenn teens ie es 4.00 
Wol. V.—(fo17—1918)- Unbound. ae es rane, 9 oc 
= “hota ees ree as 
Publications. 
Haun, W. Analytic Study of Faunal Changes in Indiana, 2 plates, 
; EQ10, 27 PB eee eee sage Da Re RIES Co 
GREENE, E.1.. Leaflets of Botanical Observation and Criticism. : 
2 vols Complete. (1903-1912) -..-2.....- Sea 6.00 | 
"Cybele Columbiana, A series of Studies in Botany, ag 
chiefly North American.. No..1. (Other num- Sot 29 
bers:to follow)csio ae Ss Se ee SAN Phe “ 
a ye: Pittonia, A series of Papers Realting to Botany and or a 
Botanists, 5 vols. (1887-1905) 0222-2: 14.00 > me 4 


be 
-¥ 


west 


: Flora Franciscana, Parts I, II, III. [Part IV pub- pe aehte. 
lished long after the other parts, is quite ; 
unobtainable, as all copies not immediately 
distributed seem to have been lost in the San 


Ealit' se 
bate te 


Francisco fire.]._ Price as published__.._..-.... 2.00 a 
* 4 Manual of the Botany of the Region of San Fran- “ 23 
cisco Bay (1894). Bound cloth... 20022. 2.00 “f 
ROB oN nYe) bb 1 tn bonerhs Modes at ha Oller ian Oe tee ae ner Sy taal St L530 eS - 
(Price as published of latter)... 2.00 es 
UTTERBACK, W. I. Naiades of Missouri, 200 pp. ee) pl and some text . 
PE UEES SS Gl peta a tne ree area ha ey eae ase 1.75 : 
; eis oy 
° he. 
Reprints. ‘ 
RAFINESQUE, C. S.. Neogenyton, (1825) 220.20..5 2M S$ A225 ot 
Le fe The Natural Family of the Carexides (1840).....2. .50 : 
4s ve Seadiography or 100 Genera of Ombelliferous 2 
Plants set): GRSaO) esi 02 aN rt ey 1.50 te: 
ms af Monographie des Coquilles Bivalves et Fluvia- ‘ 


tiles de la Riviere Ohio. Remarques sur les 

Rapports Naturels des Genres Viscum, Samolus 

et Viburnum. A Bruxelles (1820)_-_.....-2.....-.... 150 
LeConrvx:E, J. B. Reprints of Monographs without plates, $2.50; with 

42 photographic copies of unpublished plates 

(7x8), $25.00; with colored photographic plates...$37.50 
LeConte, J. E. ‘Two extra plates reproduced from originalsin N. Y. 

Bot. Garden. - Colored, $1.50; uncolored.......-.--. 1.0e 


Foe 3 Be age | 7 pig fa ee 
ye Bea Pry s Sees - wy 3 * 
ee ‘ a ——— nd 
ete - “a - 


MOLV = FO 5 MAYAJULY, 19i9 | 2 NOS. 3, 4 


adié.x MIDLAND 


NATURALIST 


Devoted to Natural History, Primarily 
that of the Prairie States 


t/On 7; 
~~ 


CONTENTS 


The Missouri Muhlenbergias—II. — Benjamin Franklin Bush 33 


~ Panicum Lineare, Linn. Oliver A. Farwell 49 
- Our Sparrows Brother Alphonsus, C. S. C. 51 
~~ PRICE $1.50 A YEAR SINGLE NUMBERS 30 CENTS 


FOREIGN, 6s. 6d. 


Entered as second-class matter at Notre Dame, Indiana, Acceptance for mailing at special 
tate of postage provided for in section 1103, Act of October 3, 1917, 
authorized on July 3, 1918. 


Pad 


ee 
A 


THE UNIVERSITY PRESS, NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


Back Naber f “The ntiiian Midland Naturalist.” ne 


reg 


Vol. I.—(1909-1910) 293 pp. Unbound. 2... on 8 ie Seg oe 
Vol. II.—(1911~1912).' 330 pp. Unbound and exclusive of 3 Reprints. — . 
to he bound in‘end of vol SS ea ee Oe 
Inclusive of Three Reprints (see below). Wyxtre ste oe a ee PBT aii 
Vol. III.—(1913-1914). 383 pp. Unbound, exclusive of Reprint No. 4. 
(See below). [Nos. 1, 2, 3, 7.) are scarce and nearly out of print, 
costing 50 ctseach (22. Stee Se Ae ee eee he Se eset Pe secue 4.50 — 
Inchisive of Reprint No. 4, extra... Ask i ea S100 
Vol. IV.— (1915-1916). Unbotind.22. ick eee cosa 4.00 
Vol.-V.ot7=104r8):: Unbound... 205.02 2. ea eS FET BOO 
-Total—$17. 75 
Publications. 
Haun, W. Analytic Study of Faunal Changes in Indiana, 2 plates, 
{PE FOIL O27 PPS kee et CY ese aT AT Se $ 115 
GREENE, E. L. Leaflets of Botanical Observation and Criticism. ; 
2 vols Complete. (1903-1912)_--22-..W---.-- 6.00 
‘e a Cybele Columbiana, A series of Studies in Botany, 
chiefly North American. ~No.-1.. (Other num- 
bers ‘to follow) 22625 See et ee 575 
Ly H Pittonia, A series of Papers Realting-to Botany and 
Botanists, S-volsi (18871905). -5 ee et 14:004 ee 
ze 2 Flora Franciscana, Parts I, II, III. [Part IV pub- 
lished long -after. the other parts, is quite 
unobtainable, as all copies not immediately 
distributed seem to have been lost in the San 
Francisco fire.] Price as published... s_...« 2.00 
% ¥ Manual of the Botany of the Region of San Fran- z 
cisco Bay (1894). . Bound: cloth-....0.2 2.20. 2.00 _ 
UD ONIN oe so) Pree» ore ee a ee ed wee eee! 1,50 
(Price as published of latter)... ooh 2:00 
UTTERBACK, W. I. Naiades of Missouri, 200 pp. 29 pl and some text _ 
ies 88 2a) c(t enate 9 Ran caer SRR on is “Ini Winrar ahs sake © 1.75 
Reprints. 
RAFINESOUE, C.S3_> Neogetivton, 41825). eo a a eee ee $ 25 
ef " The Natural Family of the Carexides (1840)__._... .50 
“tf a Scadiography or 100 Genera of Ombelliferous 
Plants sete SAO ee ee oe eae 1.50 


Monographie des Coquilles Bivalves et Fluvia- 
tiles de la Riviere Ohio. Remarques sur les 
Rapports Naturels des Genres Viscum, Samolus 
et Viburnum: A Bruxelles °(1820)..0...2.2c2cc... 1.50 
LECONTE, J. B. Reprints of Monographs without plates; $2.50;: with 
42 photographie copies of unpublished plates 


(7x8), $25.00; with colored photographic plates...$37.50. 


LEContmTrE, J. E. Two extra plates reproduced from originals in N. Y. 
Bot. Garden. Colored, $1.50; uncolored...-..--_ 1.0C 


< 


. ; 3 Rane : ex 

ae eit, ; ‘ eee ears, wt , 

i Hy Um, \ ’ - x % I x ™ , rae “ 

‘ ye : I ts / ee Ane * Nee i - 
t Q x ANS “ 4 x ‘ ~ - . 5 “ sr? *y Fs “ 
, as Me Pree fh Np iy Paes i fost Sos tn) Sa * x SSG a) tA ee 7 : - 
IRS Waren Ries mel a Es Shute po at a pee TAS hee TER RPA ee . ~ 2 } ie ab Scie NE Ey 
PRS ee PRE PL ey cles A CA ret See 7, LW? Mee Oe a Ay eee ey 


’ 


Lon ASI) Yuh i ey Mallin, UNIS Be 4 Lidl ty a SSS elle) tp 


Wee: 


obits 


The American Midland Naturalist 


PUBLISHED BI-MONTHLY BY THE UNIVERSITY 
OF NOTRE DAME, NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


VOL. VI. MAY-JULY, ro19. NO. 3, 4. 


xnsonian nstip, 
o 


The Missouri Muhlenbergias.---Il. 


s 
v ? 
AUG. 4 1916.5 
‘BY BENJAMIN FRANKLIN BUSH. ye 
Taree onal vi used) 
KANSAS: Fine 
Manhattan, Kellerman, September 25, 1885, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 79969; 
s Manhattan, Kellerman, September 25, 1885, M. B. G. 
4 Herb. No. 79977; . 
Manhattan, Kellerman, September 16, 1888, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 79984; 
a Wyandotte, Mackenzie, October 3, 1897. 
$ ALABAMA: 
Cullman, Eggert, September 15, 1897, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79853- 
FLORIDA: 
Apalachicola, Chapman, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 785588; . 
MISSISSIPPI: 
_ Biloxi, Tracy, September 1, 1899; 
Panola, Eggert, September 17, 1896, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79732; 
Panola, Eggert, September 17, 1876, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79728; 
Starkville, Kearney, 16, September 27, 1896, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 79979; 
Starkville, Tracy, July 18, 1888, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79981. 
LOuIsIANA: 
Feliciana, Mohr, September, U. S. Herb. No. 722798; 
Natchitoches, Palmer 6774, October 1, 1915, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 794768. 


THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 
ARKANSAS: R 
Benton County, Plank, Summer, 1900, M. B. G. Herb. 
Herb. No. 82685; 
Fulton, Bush 897, September 18, 1900 M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79870; 
Texarkana, Heller 4161, August 27, 1898, M. B. G. Her. 
Herb. No. 79883; 


OKLAHOMA: 
Verdigris, Bush 768, August 2, 1894, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79970. 
TEXAS: 
Columbia, Bush 1461, October 12, 1900, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79871; 


Dallas, Reverchon 661, 1873, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79612; 

Dallas, Reverchon 2252, October 5, 1900, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79845; 

Dallas, Reverchon 4207A, 1881, M. B. G. Herb. No 79844; 

Elmo, Reverchon 3532, October 22, 1902, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79894; 

Elmo, Reverchon 3538, October 22, 1902, M. B. 
No. 79860; 

Elmo, Reverchon 3538, October 22, 1902, M. B. 
No. 79892; 

Galveston Bay, /Joor, October 19, 1884, M. B. 
No. 79856; 

Houston; Lindheimer, September, 1841, M. B. 
No. 79693; 

Industry, Wurzlow, 1891, U. Ill. Herb.; 

Kerrville, Hitchcock 5315, June 22, 1910, U. Ill. Herb.; 
October 9, 1901, M. B. G. Herb. No. 75877; 

Marshall, Bush 1011, 

Palestine, Joor, October 21, 1884, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79870; 

Rusk County, Vinzent 55, August, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79873; 

San Antonio, Bush 826, September 18, 1901, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79873; 

Without definite locality, Lindheimer, date not given, 
M. B. G. Herb. No. 79990; 

Without definite locality, Reverchon, date not given, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 80105; 


. Herb. 


: Herp. 


Herb. 


Gig Gt 1 a0 


Herb. 


MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS 35 


Without definite locality, Reverchon, date not given, M. B. G. 
. No. 79893; 
Mexico: 
Coatepee Hitchcock 6663, September 2-4, rg1o0, U. Ill. Herb. 
2. MUHLENBERGIA CURTISETOSA (Scribner) Bush, n. sp. 
Muhlenbergia Schrebert curtisetosa, Scribner Rhodora 9:17. 1907. 
SPECIMENS EXAMINED: 


MISSOURI: 
Eagle Rock, Bush 377, September 24, 1896, M. B G. Herb. 
No. 294597. 
Eagle Rock, Bush 377, September 24, 1896, U. S. Herb. No. 
294597; ° 
Eagle Rock, Mackenzie, September 24, 1896. 
ILLINOIS: 
Champaign, Clinton 92, date not given, U. S. Herb. No. 
952420; 


Without definite locality, Wolf, 1881, U. S. Herb. No. 
952419, TYPE of Muhlenbergia Schrebert curtisetosa. 

3. MUHLENBERGIA SOBOLIFERA (Muhl.) Trin. Gram. Unifl. 
189, 1824. 

Agrostis sobolifera Muhl.; Willd. Enum. 95. 1809. 

Trichochloa sobolifera (Muhl.) Trin. Fund. Agrost. 117. 1820. 

Muhlenbergia sobolifera Trin., Bush in Flora of Jackson County, 
Missouri, No. 860, 1885; Tracy in Flora of Missouri, No. 1645, 
1886; Eggert in Catalogue of Plants of Saint Louis, Missouri, 1891. 

Muhlenbergia sobolifera (Muhl.) Trin., Mackenzie and Bush in 
Manual of the Flora of Jackson County, Missouri, No. 1, 1902; 
Daniels in Flora of Columbia, Missouri, No. 70, 1907; Palmer 
in Catalogue of Plants of Jasper County, Misseuri, Nos. 753, 
856, 858, 1375, 2529, 2617, 2546, 3463, 3467 and 3475, 1916. 
Northern Texas and northward, according to Dewey in Manual, 
l. c., referring of course to M. setigera q. v. 
N. E. to Minn. and southward, according to Hitchcock in 
Manual. 
N. H. and Mass. to Minn. Va. Tenn. and the Ind. Terr., according 
to Nash in Flora. 
N. W. to Minn. south to Va. Tenn. and the Ind. Terr., according 
to Nash in Illustrated Flora. 

From New York and New Jersey to Neos Missouri, Kansas 
and Northern Arkansas. 


36 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


SPECIMENS EXAMINED: 
NEW YORK: 
Ithaca, Rowlee, 1889, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79759; 
Pennyan, Sartwell, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79629; 


Western New York, Gray, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. 


No. 79627. 
PENNSYLVANIA: 
Chester County, Canby, 1865, M. B. G. Herb, No 79751; 


Conewago, Heller 4792, September 27, 1907, M. B. G. Herb. 


No. 79758. 
MARYLAND: 
Harper’s Ferry, Holm, June 10, 1912, U. Ill. Herb.; 


Harper’s Ferry, Holm, June 10, 1912, M. B. G. Herb. No. 


779176. 
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: 
Washington, Ball and Paddock 26, August 7, 1899, M. B. G. 
Herb. No 79767. 
ILLINOIS: 2 
Belleville, Engelmann, August, 1833, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79660, the plant marked 2 on this sheet; 
Centerville, Eggert, August 31, 1877, M. B. G. Herb. No 79752; 
Centerville, Eggert, August 31, 1877, M. B. G. Herb. No 79753; 
Centerville, Eggert, August 31, 1877, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79754; 
Centerville, Eggert, August, 31, 1877, M. B. G. No. 79834; 
Centerville, Eggert, August 31, 1877, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
767046; 
Mount Carmel, Schneck, October 20, 1881, U. Ill. Herb.; 
Peoria, Brendel, date not given, U. Ill. Herb.; 
Peoria, McDonald, August, 1888, M. B. G. Herb. No. 773046; 
Taylorville, Andrews, August 20, 1898, U. Ill. Herb.; 
Taylorville, Andrews, August 26, 1898, U. Ill. Herb.; 
Wabash County, Schneck, July 1, 1879, U. Ill. Herb., the 
plant marked B on this sheet; 
Wabash County, Schneck, September 1, 1879, U. Ill. Herb.; 
Wabash County, Schneck, September 6, 1879, U. Ill. Herb.; 
Wabash Conty, Schneck, August 17, 1880, U. Ill. Herb. 
- MIssourRI: . 
Allenton, Letterman, August, 1876, M. B. G. Herb. No. 772801; 
Allenton, Letterman, August, 1893, M. B. G. Herb. No. 772803; 
Bagnell, Tvelease, September 22, 1897, M. B, G, Herb. No.79765 


vd ere wee 


MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS 37 


Bagnell, Trelease, September 18, 1897, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79760; 

Big Bend of the Meramec, Glatfelter, September 15, 1891, 

.. M. B. G. Herb. No. 80064; 

Cliff Cave, Kellogg 32, October 10, 1901, M. B. G. Herb No. 
79800; 

Cliff Cave, Kellogg, October 10, 1901, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
950200; 

Current River, Carter County, Trelease, September 10, 1897, 
M. B. G. Herb. No. 79763; 

Dodson, Bush 1868, August 24, 1903, M. B. G. Herb. No. 

wire LV eet 

Dodson, Bush 1868, August 24, 1903, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79756; 

Dodson, Hoffman 145, September 17, 1916; 

Eolia, Davis 1440, October 23, 1911, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
709440; 

Greene County, Bush 4814, September 4, 1893, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 80038; 

Independence, Bush, 1884, U. S. Herb. No. 746205; 

Jackson County, Bush, September 4, 1893, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 80040; 

Joplin, Trelease, October 7, 1897, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79761; 

McDonald County, Bush, September 1, 1893, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 80037. 

Meramec Spring, Phelps County, Trelease, September 25, 1898, 
M. B. G. Herb. No. 79764; 

Noel, Palmer 4176, September 8, 1913, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
717316; 

Noel, Palmer 4254, September 10, 1913, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
717317; 

Pearl, Standley 9230, August 22, 1912, U.S. Herb. No. 688145; 

Randolph, Mackenzie 370, October 2, 1898; 

Sibley, Bush 4814, August 31, 1907, M. B. G. Herb No. 
78930; 

Sulpher Springs, Jefferson County, Trelease, October 23, 1898, 
MBG. Herb: No. 79762; 

Swope Park, Mackenzie 432, September 13, 1901; 

Swope Park, Stigall 50, September 16,.1906, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 80054. 


38 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Webb City, Palmer 753, July 22, 1906, M. B. G. Herb. No. 


8055; 
_ Webb City, Palmer 856, July 22, 1906, M. B. G. Herb. No. 

756979; 

Webb City, Palmer 1375, August 4, 1908, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
756957; 

Webb City, Palmer 1375, August 4, 1908, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 80056; 

Webb City, Palmer 2546, July 22, 1909, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
757604; 

Webb City, Palmer 2546, July. 22, 1909, .M B. G. Herb. No. 
80058; : 

Webb City, Palmer 2549, July 19, 1909, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 756956; 

Webb City, Palmer 2617, September 2, 1909, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 80061; 


Wicks, Kellogg 31, July 20, 1898, U. S. Herb. No. 709440; 
Wicks, Kellogg 31, July 20, 1898, M. B. G. Herb. No 79766. 
Iowa: 
Steamboat Rock, Pammel, Hume, and Fitz 1346, date not 
given, U:S.-Hetb;: No. 79771 ; 
Winterset, Carver 1928, 1894, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79769; 
KANSAS: 
Cherokee County, Hitchcock 889, 1896, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79636; 
Rosedale, Mackenzie, July 19, 1896; 
NEBRASKA: 
Weeping Water, Williams, August, 1899, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79628. 
ARKANSAS: 
Eureka Springs, Palmer 4425, September 20, 1913, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 716987. 
Culms much branched from the base, 3-4 dm. tall, smooth, erect; 
infranodes slightly strigose below the glabrous nodes, at least the 
lower; leaves numerous, 5-10 cm. long, 3-5 mm, wide; panicles 
slender 1-1.5dm. long, the short branches oppressed; spikelets 
2-2.5 mm. long, acute, somewhat crowded; glumes broadly ovate, 
acute or acuminate, one- to two-thirds as long as the floret; 


, MUHLENBERGIA SETIGERA (Scribner) Bush, n. sp. 
Muh'lenbergia sobolifera setigera Scpibner, Rhodora 9:18. 1907. 


> 
LS 


s 
3 
a 
; 
fy 
4 
cs 
= 
5 
> 
a0 
F F 
ay 


MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS 39 


lemma slender acuminate, hairy-tufted at the base, attenuate 
into a slender awn 1-5 mm. long. 

Differs from M. sobolifera in having shorter, much-branched 
culms, shorter and narrower leaves, shorter and denser panicles, 
longer and narrower florets which are awned. Was referred by 
Vasey to M. sylvatica, M. sylvatica, var., M. sobolifera, M. sobolifera 
var., and M. Waulldenovit. 

Scribner based M. sobolifera setigera on Reverchon’s 70 and 
1054, referring to it also his No. 30, but gives neither dates not 
localities for the type specimens. Many years ago Reverchon sent 
to Dr. George Vasey of the Department of Agriculture, specimens 
of Grasses to be determined, and these were numbered from 1 up, 
usually marking ‘“‘ Vasey”’ on his labels. 

The specimens of Muhlenbergia which I am referring to this new 
species, which he sent to be named, were reported by Vasey under 
five names, M. sylvatica, M. sylvaitca var—, M. sobolifera, M. 
sobolifera var, and M. Wlldenovit. Believing these to be 
distinct species and varieties, Reverchon numbered one 1049, 
another 1050 and so on up to 1054, these being the numbers given 
to these species and varieties in his MS. list of Texas Plants. 

But the specimens sent to Dr. Vasey with numbers on the labels, 
and other numbers bearing the same numbers do not agree, and I 
feel confident that Reverchon used the same numbers over and over. 

I have seen several of Reverchon’s No. 70, supposedly part of 
the No. 70 sent to Vasey, and these are marked M. sylvatica var. 
—, presumably a MS. name of Vasey’s, but these do not appear 
to be the same as that examined by Scribner. I have also examined 
two sheets of specimens marked 30 by Reverchon, collected at 
Ferris, Texas, but these differ from the No. 30 examined by Vasey 
and Scribner, and cited by Scribner as belonging to his M. sobolifera 
setigera, in being short-awned. These Ferris specimens are named 
M. sobolifera var.—presumably a MS. name of Vasey’s, and the 
date of collection is stated as 1884 and 1888, while the one cited 
by Scribner is said to be dated 1885. One of the Ferris specimens 
is numbered 1665, which makes it apparent that Reverchon sep- 
arated this variety from M. sobolifera, and assigned it a much later 
number in his MS. list of Texas Plants. 

Having been intimately acquainted with Mr. Reverchon, I 
learned much about his numbering, the earlier collecting being 
numbered according to his MS. list, which was arranged in accord- 


40 THE AMERICAN MIDI,AND NATURALIST 


ance with his collecting. When Reverchon first began collecting 
plants in Texas, in the seventies, the first species he collected he 
listed as No. 1,,the next No. 2, and so on up to about No. 1884, 
when I persuaded him to adopt the serial system of numbering, 
beginning with the last number in his MS. list, aes giving each 
collection a different number. 

According to this earlier method of numbering, every species 
bore the same number, no matter where and when collected, as 
for instance, M. sobolifera was No. 1052, and every collection of 
what he took to be M. sobolijera he gave that number to, no matter 
where it was collected, in 1878, 188c, 1882 or 1885. 

I have also examined one sheet of Reverchon’s No. 1054, which is 
labeled M. Mexicana by Reverchon, cited by Scribner as part of 
the type of WV. sobolifefa setigera, but this appears to me to be only 
M. Mexicana. It differs from M. sobolifera setigera in having the 
lower glumes acuminate and nearly as long as the lemma, the lemma 
merely acute or acutish and not awned. 

SPECIMENS EXAMINED: 

OKLAHOMA: 

Sapulpa, Bush 769, July 22, 1894, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79634, 

labeled MV. sobolifera by Bush; 

Verdigris, Bush 770, August 2, 1894, U. S. Herb. No. 217323, 

labeled M. sobolfera by Bush and M. Mexicana by Scribner. 

TEXAS: 

Dallas, Reverchon 1054, September, 1880, U. S. Herb. No. 
49861, labeled M. Mexicana filiformis by Reverchon, 
and M. sobolifera by Scribner; 

Dallas, Reverchon 2253, October 5, 1900 U. S. Herb. No. 
411579, labeled M. Mexicana by Bush, and M. sylvatica by 
Scribner; 

Dallas, Reverchon 42073, August 26, 1880, U. S. Herb. No. 
501272, labeled M. tenuiflora by Bush; 

Dallas, Reverchon 2253, October 5, 1900, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75666, labeled M. Mexicana by Reverchon; 

Dallas, Reverchon 2253, October 5, 1900, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75665, labeled M. Mexicana by Bush; 

Dallas, Reverchon 2253, October 5, 1900. M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75646, labeled M. Mexicana by Bush; 

Dallas, Reverchon 1052, 1882, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79768, 
labeled M. sobolifera by Reverchon; 


ete eee ek SY ete eee . . 


6 tpt toe caciagtact nig yee 


: 
: 
2 
3 
ay 
*: 
te 


pes 


MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS 4I 


Dallas, Reverchon 4207, August, 1880, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79757, labeled M. sobolifera by Bush; 

Dallas County, Reverchon, date riot given, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79719, labeled M. sylvatica by Reverchon; 

Ferris, Reverchon 30, 1884, M. B. G. Herb. No. 80712, labeled 
M. sobolijfera var.— by Reverchon, evidently a MS. 
name of Vasey’s; 

Ferris, Reverchon 30, 1884, M. B. G. Herb. No. 80111, labeled 
M. sobolifera var. — by Reverchon, no doubt part of 
sheet No. 80112; 

Ferris, Reverchon 16y65, 1888, M. B. G. Herb. No. 80710, 
labeled M. sobolifera var. — by Reverchon; 

Without definite locality, Reverchon 70, 1879, type, U. S. 
Herb. No. 49863, labeled M. Walldenovit by Reverchon 
and Scribner, and M. sylvatica var. — by Scribner; 

Without definite locality, Reverchon 70. date not given, M. B. 
G. Herb. No. 80082, labeled M. Willdenovit by Reverchon, 
and evidently co-type of Scribner’s variety; 

Without definite locality, Reverchon, date not given, pre- 
sumably the same collection as No. 70 on sheet No. 80082, 
M. B. G. Herb. No. 80084, labeled M. sylvatica by Reverchon. 

Without definite locality, Reverchon 1049, 1881, possibly the 
same collections as specimens on sheet No. 80084, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 80083, labeled M. sylvatica var. — by Rever- 
chon, probably a MS. name of Vasey’s; 

Without definite locality, Reverchon 1052, date not given, 
marked ‘‘127 Vasey,” labeled M. solobifera by Reverchon, 
probably being the name supplied by Vasey; 

Without definite locality, Reverchon, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79891; 

Without definite locality, Reverchon 1054, date not given, M. 
B. G. Herb. No. 75661; 

Without definite locality, Reverchon 30, 1885, U. S. Herb. No. 
952417, labeled M. Mexicana, and M. sobolifera var. — by 
Scribner ; 

Without definite locality, but presumably Dallas, Reverchon 
“1054, 1880, U. S. Herb. No. 49862, labeled M. sobolzfera, 
and M. Wulldenovit by Scribner. 

4. MUHLENBERGIA BRACHYPHYLLA Bush, n. sp. 
Culms 2-4 dm. tall, much branched, much branched from the 


42 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


base, the old culms stramineous, shining; infranodes glabrous; 
nodes glabrous; leaves numerous, short, narrow, the larger 5-7 
dm. long, the upper reduced to 1-2 dm.; principal nerves of the 


larger leaves 7-9; panicles terminal on the culms and branches, 


and from all the upper and middle sheaths, numerous, very slender, 
short, the divisions appressed, the terminal and those terminating 
the branches usually short-exserted, those from the lowest sheaths 
usually long-exserted on very slender peduncles; spikelets 3mm. 
long, rather slender; glumes broadly lanceolate, attenuate or cuspi- 
date, about one-half as long as the lemma; lemmas lanceolate, 
awned, minutely bearded at the base, sometimes awnless or short- 
awned; awns slender, about as long as the lemmas or sometimes 
shorter. 

Type specimens collected at Webb City, Missouri, Palmer 2734, 
September 20, 1909, specimens in the Herbarium of the Missouri 
Botanical Garden, sheet No. 757387. 

The species here proposed has been referred to M. Torrey: on the 
one hand and to M. tenuiflora on the other, but differs conspicuously 
from these species in being lower, more branched, in having more 
numerous leaves which are shorter and narrower, with but 7-9 
principal nerves, in having numerous panicles, which are mostly 
short-exserted, in having glabrous yellow polished infranodes and 
glabrous nodes. It is much nearer M. Mexicana, to which it bears a 
strong resemblance, but differs in having shorter and broader 
glumes, awned lemmas, and long-exserted panicles from the lower 
sheaths. 

SPECIMENS EXAMINED: 

Missouri: 

Golden City, Palmer 4575, October 6, 1913, M. B. G. Herb. 
NMG.07 17225; 

Webb City, Palmer 2734, September 20, 1909, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 757387, TYPE; 

Webb City, Palmer 2734, September 20, 1909, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 80062, TYPE collection. 

ILLINOIS: 

Bluffs Lake, Eggert, September 24, 1875, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79733- 

5. MUHLENBERGIA TENUIFLORA (Willd.) B. S. P. Cat. PI. 
N. Y. 67, 1888. 

Agrostis tenuiflora Willd. Sp. Pl. 1:364, 1787. 


| 


MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS 43 


Agrostis pauciflora Bush, Fl. Am. Sept. 1:63, 1814. 

Trichochloa longiseta Trin. Agrost. 117, 1820. 

Muhlenbergia Willdenovit Trin. Gram. Unifl. 188, 1824. 

Muhlenbergia Wulldenovit Trin., Tracy in Flora of Missouri, 
No. 1647, 1886; Eggert in Catalogue of Plants of Saint Louis, 
Missouri, 1891. 

Muhlenbergia tenuiflora (Willd.) B. S. P., Mackenzie and Bush 
in Manual of the Flora of Jackson County, Missouri, No. 5, 1902; 
Daniels in Flora of Columbia, Missouri, No. 74, 1907. 

Northern Texas to Mass. and Minn., Dewey in Manual of the 
Plants of Western Texas. 

Mass. to Ont. Minn. and southward, Hitchcock in Manual. 

Mass. to S. Ont. Minn. Ala. and Texas, Nash in Flora. 

Mass. to Minn. Ala. and Texas, Nash in Illustrated Flora. 
SPECIMENS EXAMINED: 

West Haven, Kirk 976, August 17, 1913, U. S. Herb. No. 
725822, labeled M. tenuiflora by Kirk, and M. sobolifera 
setigera by the Department of Agriculture. 

NEw YORK: 

Pennyan, Sartwell, date not given, M. B. G Herb. No. 79582, 
the plant marked 2 on this sheet; 

Western New York, Gray, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79587. 

ONTARIO: 

Foster’s Flats, Macoun 26, 242, July 11, 1901, U. S. Herb. 
No. 952525. . 

NEW JERSEY: 

Cranberry Lake, Mackenzie 2453, September 16, 1906, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 80101; 

Sussex County, Mackenzie 1095, September 25, 1904; 

Sussex County, Mazckenzte 2453, September 16, 1906. 

PENNSYLVANIA: 

Germantown, Digyn, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79583. 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: 

Washington, Ward, July 28, 1878, M. B. G. Herb. No. 80085. 

OHIO: 

Margaretta Ridge, Moscley, July 28, 1896, U. S. Herb. No. 
431146. 


44 


THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 
TENNESSEE: 
Cowan, Ruth 26, July, 1898, U. S. Herb. No. 952526. 
KENTUCKY: 
Big Black Mountain, Kearney 234, August, 1893, U. S. Herb. 
No. 952527; 
Big Black Mountain, Kearney 234, August, 1893, U. S. Herb. 
No. 822978; 
Big Black Mountain, Kearney 234, August, 1893, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 79586; 
Harlan Court House, Kearney 33, August, 1893, :‘U. S. Herb. 
No. 952528; 
Harlan Court House, Kearney 33, August, ron U U.: Serb: 
No. 822979; 
Harlan Court House, Kearney 33, August, 1893,” M.- E.G 
Herb. No. 79588; 
Pineville, Mackenzie 962, August-September, 1904. 
ILLINOIS: 


Edgemont, Crazg, October 23, 1910, M. B. G. Herb. No. 82662; 

Elgin, Vasey, date not given, U. Ill. Herb.; 

Peoria, Brendel, date not given, U. Ill. Herb.; 

Peoria, McDonald, August, 1889, M. B. G. No. 773047; 

St. Clair County, Eggert, August 3, 1877. M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79838; 

St. Clair County, Eggert, August 3, 1877, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 739936; 

St. Clair County, Eggert, August 3, 1877, N. D. Herb. No. 8143; 

Urbana, Seymour and White, September 26, 1886, U. Ill. 

Wabash County, Schneck, July 2, 1879, in part, the plant 
marked A on this sheet, U. Ill. Herb.; 


Wabash County, Schneck, September 4, 1904. U. Ill. Herb. 


Missouri: 

Allenton, Letterman, August 1, 1900, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
867670; 

Allenton, Letterman, August _1, 1900. M. B. G. Herb. No. 
772805 ; 

Sibley, Mackenzie 548 A, October 2, 1901; 

Without definite locality, Bush, date not given, U. S. Herb 
No. 950198. 


wrt 


us 2 
ante Sole Pl a Oo 


eT Ree ae eae Ne al 
eet 


MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS 45 


NortH CAROLINA: 
Montreat, Standley and Bollman 9966 August 23, 1913. 
U. S. Herb. No. 688883; 
Waynesville, Standley 3687, September 9, 1910, U. S. Herb. 
No. 514551. 
MICHIGAN: 
Saugatuck, Umbach, August 5, 1898. 
Iowa: 
Iowa City, Hitchcock, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79585; 
Winterset, Carver 260, September, 1884, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 82688; 
ALABAMA: 
Jackson County, Chase 4490, October 15, 1907, U. S. Herb. 
No. 590834; : 
- Jackson County, Chase, October 15, 1907, U. Ill. Herb. 
ARKANSAS: 
Mount Mena, Trelease, October 1, 1898, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79444. 
OKLAHOMA: : 
Sapulpa, Bush 773, September 20, 1894, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79621: 
6. MUHLENBERGIA RACEMOSA (Michx.) B.S. G. Prel. Cat. N. Y. 


67. 1888. 


Agrostis racemosa Michx. Fl. Bor. Am. 1:53. 1803. 

Agrostis setosa Muhl. Gram. 68. 1817. 

Trichochloa glomerata Trin. Fund. Agrost. 117. 1820. 

Trichochloa calycina Trin. Fund. Agrost. 117. 1820. 

Polypogon racemosus (Michx.) Nutt. Gen. 1:51. 1818. 

Muhlenbergia glomerata (Trin.) Gram Unifl. 191. 1824. 

Muhlenbergia glomerata ramosa Vasey, Cat. Grasses U.S. 40. 1885. 
1885. 

M uhlenbergia racemosa ramosa (Vasey) Beal, Grasses U. S. 
2:253. 1896. 

Muhlenbergia glomerata Trin., Bush in Flora of Jackson County, 
Missouri, No. 564, 1882; Tracy in Flora of Missouri, 
No. 1642, 1886; Eggert in Catalogue of Plants of Saint 
Louis, Missouri, 1891. 

Muhlenbergia racemosa (Michx.) B. S. P., Mackenzie and Bush 
in Manual cf the Flora of Jackson County, Missouri, No. 4, 


46 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


1902; Daniels in Flora of Columbia, Missouri, No. 72, 
1907. 

N. F. to Wash. and B. Col. and southward in the East to N. Car., 
and in the West to Texas (?), N. Mex. and Ariz., Scribner 
and in the West to Texas (?), N. Mex. and Ariz., Scribner 
in Rhodora, 1. c. 

N. F. to N. J. and southward, Hitchcock in Manual. 

N.’F. to B. Bot.; N.-J., Nz Car., Mo, and N? Mexico, Waster 

Flora. 


N. F. to B. Col. south to N. J. and N. Mex. Nash in Illustrated 
Flora. 


New Foundland to Washington, south to Alabama and Nevada. 
SPECIMENS EXAMINED: 
NEWFOUNDLAND: 
Exploits River and Badger Brook, Robinson and Schrenk Ns 
August 13, 1894, M. B. G. Herb. No. 80096; 
Exploits River and Badger Brook, Robinson and Schrenk 196, 
August 13, 1894, M. B. G. No. 79741. 
MAINE: 
Crystal, Knight, September 15, 1905; 
Mount Desert Island, Rand and Redfield, August 21, 1897, 
M.B:.Ge Herp. No: 70710" 
St. Francis, Fernald 169, mae 21, 1889, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79967. 
NEW HAMPSHIRE: 
Gilmanton, Blake, September 6, 1861, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79909; 
Sanbornton, Carter, 128, September 20, 1902, U. Ill. Herb. 
VERMONT: 
Bellows Falls, Carey, 1741, M. B. G. Herb. Ne. 79677. 
CANADA: : 
Lamberton, Glatfelter, August 2, 1892, M. B. G. Herb. Ne. 
80002. 
NEw YORK: 
Bergen, Coll ctor not given, August 30, 1907, U. Ill. Herb.; 
Niagara Falls, Eugelmann, August, 1840, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79678; 
Niagara Falls, Morong, August 28, M. B. G. Herb. No. 78010; 
Pennyan, Sariwell, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79961; 


Ae 
~~ 


oe Ba J 


/ 
MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS 47 


Western New York, Gray, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79965; 
Western New York, Gray, date not given, M. B. G. No. 79962; 
' Western New York, Gray, date not given, M. B. G. No. 
79676; 
Without definite locality, collector and date not given, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 79954. 


ONTARIO: 
Bicaber, Hoy, August, 1883, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79624; 
Lambton County, Glatfelter, August 22, 1892, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 80066. 


NEw JERSEY: 
Cranberry Lake, Mackenzie 2428, September 16, 1906, M. B. G. 
No. 80100. 
Mount Arlington, Mackenzie 918, August 21, 1904; 
Sussex County, Mackenzie 2428, September 16, 1906; 
Without definite locality, Curtis M. B. G. Herb. No. 79675; 


INDIANA: 
Wells County, Deam, September 11, 1901, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
80076. 


ILLINOIS: 

Augusta, Mead, 1843, M. B. G. Herb. No. 82695; 

Bluffs Lake, Eggert, September 11, 1877, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79908 ; 

Champaign, Clinton, October 1, 1895. U. Ill. Herb.; 

Chicago, Glatfelter 643, August 20, 1893, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
80071; 

Dupont, Eggert, September 11, 1877, M. B. G. No. 739390; 

Dupont, Eggert 11, 1877, M. B. G. Herb. No. 738989; 

Dupont, Eggert, September 11, 1877, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
772999; 

Dupont, Eggert, September 11, 1877, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79840; 

Dupont, Eggert, September 11, 1877, N. D. Herb. No. 8144; 

Dupont, Eggert, September 11, 1877, N. D. Herb. No. 8140; 

East Alton, McDonald, August, 1897, U. Ill. Herb.; 

Elgin, Sherff 1946, September 14, 1912. U. Ill. Herb.; 

Falling Springs, Engelmann, September, 1844, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 79673, evidently part of the collection sheet 


48 


THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


No. 79674, the plant marked A on that sheet exactly 
matching this; 
Lake Villa, Gleason and Shobe 128, August 6, 1906, U.Ill. Herb.; 
Lake Villa, Gleason and Shobe 200, August 9, 1900, U. Ill. Herb.; 
Oquawka, Patterson, September, year not given, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 772777; 
Peoria, Brendel, date not given, U. Ill. Herb.; 
Princeville, Chase 940, October 14, 1900, U. Ill. Herb.; 
Princeville, Chase 1269, September 23, 1906, U. Ill. Herb.; 
Wady Petre, Chase 1943, September 22, 1908, U. Ill. Herb.; 
Without definite locality, Patterson, date not given, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 785591. 


Missouri: 


Banks of the Mississippi, presumably just South of Saint 
Louis, Engelmann, August, 1843, the plants marked B on 
this sheet, the other plant marked A on this sheet evidently 
belonging to sheet No. 79673; 

Congo, Hoffman, October 7, 1916; 

Courtney, Bush 6508, October 16, 1911, U. §. Herb. No. 
673597; 

Creve Coeur Lake Kellogg 28, September 25, 1901, U. S. Herb 
No. 950202; 

Creve Coeur Lake, Norton, September 11, 1898, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 82683; 

Dodson, Hoffman, September 10, 1916; 

Hannibal, Davis 1044, September 16, 1911, U. S. Herb. No. 
673942; 


Hannibal, Davis 1044, September 16, 1911, M. B. G. Herb. 


No. 709096; 

Jackson County, Bush 59, August 26, 1890, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 768677; 

Jackson County, Bush 1876, August 28, cs M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 80054; 

Jackson County, Bush, September 11, 1892, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 80044; 

Jackson County, Bush, September 22, 1893, M. B. G. No. 
80050; 

Jackson County, Bush 405, September 22, 1892,~U;,0. .Ebere 
No. 950210; 


» Saat 


PANICUM LINEARE, LINN. 49 


Jefferson Barracks, Eggert, September 11, 1877, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79907; 

Randolph, Mackenzie 368, October 2, 1898, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
89720; 

Randolph, Mackenzie 369, October 2, 1898; 

Sheffield, Hoffman, October 7, 1916; 

Sheffield, Mackenzie 658, October 18, 1901; 

St. Louis, Eggert 225 a, September 4, 1877, U. S. Herb. No. 
950203, exactly same date and collection as specimens 
on sheet No. 79907; 

St. Louis, Engelmann, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. No. 


79963. 


Panicum Lineare, Linn. 


BY OLIVER A. FARWELL. 


In the Species Plantarum Ed. 2, Vol. 1, p. 85, 1762, Linnaeus 
published Panicum lineare as a new species with the following 
description: ‘‘Panicum spicis digitatis subquaternis linearibus, 
flosculis solitariis secundis muticis. Habitat in Indiis. Culmi 
prostrati, laeves, ramosi. Spiculae lineares, rectae, angustae. 
Flores subtus alterni. Calycis squama exterior brevior, patens, 
rachi adherens.”’ 

There is no specimen in the Linnaean Herbarium and there is 
no reference to older authors. The species must be interpreted 
from the description alone. It is self evident from the diagnosis 
that the species belongs to the Digitaria group. It can not be 
P. Dactylon Linn. since it is laeves and prostrate while the latter 
has the spikes bast interiore villosis and the plant is sarmentis 
repentibus; it can not be P. sanguinale Linn. or P. filiforme Linn. 
since in these the flowers are im pairs while in P. lineare they are 
placed singly. The habitat in Indiis may mean India and the East 
Indies, or it may mean in both the East and West Indies. Linnaeus 
used it both ways, I believe, but in the present instance the pre- 
sumption is that he meant in both the East and West Indies since 
in the Mantissa II 323, 1771 he refers to his P. lineare, without 
comment, the P. lineare Burm. Ind. 25, t. 10. f. 2 and the Gramen 


50 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Dactylon, etc., Sleane, hist. 1, p. 113, t. 70, f. 3. We can not, there- 
fore, neglect a study of the West Indian species in endeavoring to 
ascertain the proper application of the Linnaean name. Mr. 
Hitchcock in Contributions U. S. Nat. Herb. XII, pp, 134, 142 and 


209, 1908-9, has shown that the Sloane reference belongs to what . 


is now known as Syntherisma setosa (Desv.) Nash or S. digitata 
(Swz.) A. S. Hitch.; he combines under the latter name two forms 
that have been variously considered as distinct species or as 
varieties of Panicum sanguinale Linn. Grisebach, Flora Br. W. Ind. 
544, 1864, has described these West Indian forms as pilose; there- 
fore, they can scarcely be considered as belonging to P. lineare 
Linn. which was described as laeves. It has been customary to 
accept Burmann’s Panicum lineare Fl. Ind. 25, pl. 10, fig. 2 (fig. 3 
of the plate) as typifying the Linnaean species but this can not be 
adhered to as it did not make its appearance until 6 years after 
Iinnaecus had published his P. lineare. Burmann uses the 
Linnaean diagnostic description verbatim and the references to 
Sloane mentioned above, with the added remark -—‘‘Specimina ex 
India missa variant spicis saepe binis linaeribus and flosculis 
alternis.’’ Since Linnaeus assisted Burmann in the preparation of 
his Flora Indica, the above phrase seems to indicate that the former 
thought that the variable specimens from India were not typical of 
his P. lineare but could be referred to it; also it may be considered as 
more evidence that the original habitat ‘“‘in Indiis’’ as given by 
Linnaeus did not include India but referred more especially to 
the East and West Indian Archipelagoes. It seems probable that 
fig. 2 (which is fig. 3 of the plate due to a transposition of the 
numbers) represents the variable plants of India mentioned in the 
supplementary paragraph. Hooker, Flora Br. India VII, 289, 
1897 refers Burmann’s P. lineare to Cynodon Dactylon (Linn.) Pers. 
I have seen specimens of the latter from India that might be said 
to be fairly well represented by Burmann’s figure if it may be 
viewed in the light of a very crude drawing. The Index Kewensis, 
Vol. II, 415, 1895, refers it to Paspalum brevifolium Fluegge; 
but Hooker, 1, c., 18, describes this species as with gemzinate flowers, 


one sessile and- the other pedicelled which is at wide variance with. 


Burmann’s figure, and the Linnaean description. The Index 
Kewensis recognizes Panicum glabrum Gaud. as a valid species; 
also P. lineare Linn. as a valid species of N. America but Iam unable 
to interpret it. 


OUR SPARROWS 51 


The Linnaean description as compared with modern day descrip- 
tions is rather incomplete; in so far as it goes, however, it is char- 
acteristic of the plant that has generally been known as Panicum 
glabrum Gaud. Likewise, by the process of eliminating all related 
_ species which it can not possibly be, we gradually come to the sam=2 
species, Panicum glabrum Gaud. The last sentence of the Linnacan 
description referring to the exterior glume spreading and adhering 
to the rachis is not always apparent but I have seen just such a 
condition in some specimens of Digitaria humifusa collected in 
Michigan. This species is not usually accredited to the ‘“‘Indies’”’ 
in botanical manuals but Hooker l. c., 17, gives it for the Himalaya 
Mts. and as far south as Simla, and the Index Kewensis to North 
Temperate and Tropical regions. Perhaps Linnaeus was mis- 
informed as to its distribution and as happened in other cases with 
him, gave accordingly a wrong habitat. The more important 
synonyms are given below. 

Digitaria linearis (Linn.) Pers. Syn. 1, 85, 1805; Crep. Man. ed. 
2, 335, 1866. Panicum linearis Linn. Sp. Pl. Ed. 2, Vol. 1, 85, 1762; 
Burm. Fl. Ind. 25 pl. ro fig. 2 (3), 1768; Krock. FI. Siles. 1,. 95, 
1787. Syntherisma linearis (Linn.) Nash, Bull. Torr. Bot. Club, 
XXII, 420. 1895. Panicum Ischaemum Schreb. ex Schweigg. 
Spec. Fl. Erlang, I, 16, 1804. Dvgitaria humifusa Pers., 1. ec. 
Paspalum ambiguum Lam. and D. C., Fl. Fr. III, 16, 1805. Syn- 
therisma glabrum Schrad. Fl. Germ. 163, t. 3. fig. 7, 1806. 

I wish to thank Dr. Nieuwland of Notre Dame for courtesies 
shown me in connection with this study. 


Department of Botany, 
Park, Davis & Co., Detroit, Mich. 


Our Sparrows. 


BY BROTHER ALPHONSUS, C. S. C. 


In this article I have not made an exhaustive study of each 
species, but have given their more striking characteristics as these 
were learned through observation. As the Song Sparrow is the 
commonest of all our sparrows, as well as the most gifted as a 
songster, I have written a fuller account of this species. Four 
sparrows—Henslow’s, Lark, Swamp, and Savanna—are either rare 


52 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


or very rare; and so I have not attempted to write even a brief 
biography of these species. The most that could be said of them 
would be to set down the few records which I have made of these 
sparrows, and that I have already done in previous articles. 


» 


SoNG SPARROW. 
Melospiza fasciata. 


Observations of this species will show many differences in different 
years. I shall not attempt here to note all the various records I 
have made of the species for many years but have selected the 
months from October 1912 to April 1913 for special study. 

The song season of this sparrow gradually draws to a close at 
the end of August; but after a month of silence, about the 1st 
of October, when there are often fine days, some loud notes of the 
species may be heard for a few days. And later in the month, even 
as late as the 2oth, a few feeble notes will occasionally be heard. 
After that date only call-notes are uttered, and during November 
the Song Sparrow may not be recorded frequently. In December 
1912, I made two records of the species—on December 5, and 14. 
Previous to the first date, the bird had not been seen since Novem- 
ber 25; and after the second date, there were no more records 
during the winter months. 

Very often the Song Sparrow will begin to sing a little, late in 
February, but in 1913 the first subdued notes were heard on the 
11th of March. The next day three were heard, one singing louder 
than the others. On March 13, I heard the fine notes of a Song 
Sparrow in the same place and in the same manner as an individual 
of the species had sung last year. All this would seem to indicate 
that the same bird had returned again to the same locality. The 
Song Sparrow is a great lover of water, and his matchless strain 
will be heard oftenest near lakes and streams. 

The Song Sparrow is the favorite song bird of many bird lovers. 
This is probably so both because of its long song season and the 
quality of its notes. Strong, clear, varied, melodious—these are 
characteristics of the Song Sparrow’s singing. An absence of the 
plaintive element that is so evident in such species as the Field 
and Vesper Sparrows, makes the Song Sparrow a blithe and cheery 
songster. The abundance of this species gives the student of bird 
music an excellent opportunity to appreciate its powers of song. 
As the birds usually sing in the vicinity of their nests, it is easy to 


3 
t 
‘ 


mo WARNE 


OUR SPARROW 53 


become acquainted with a number of Song Sparrows within a 
limited area. And one of the most striking things about these 
sparrows is the superiority of some as singers over others of the 
same species. Another characteristic of this sparrow is its confiding 
disposition. Often an observer may approach very near a singing 
Song Sparrow without disturbing it in the least. Frequently 
I have passed beneath them in low trees, and not intimidated them. 

This confidence in man that is so remarkable a trait of the Song 
Sparrow is also shown by the place it may select as the site for its 
nest.. Usually placed on the ground, but sometimes in a very 
small tree or in large flower stalks, the nest is not seldom near a 
path or in a garden where people pass frequently. And the nest 
may be examined without undue anxiety on the part of the old 
birds, which will do no more than utter their_characteristic call- 
note nearby. I am inclined to believe that this sparrow may have 
three broods, for I found a nest which was occupied by the young 
birds until August 23, 1918. There were three fledglings in the nest. 
On the morning of the 24th, as I approached the vicinity of the 
nest, I heard the call-notes of the young birds and the old, and I 
at once concluded that the nest must be vacant. On examination 
I found that it was empty. The nest was well constructed of 
twigs as the outer part, which was lined within by grasses. A 
heavy rain the day before did ncthing more than wash out the 
nest. 


VESPER SPARROW. 
Poocaetes gramineus. 


The Vesper Sparrow’s date of migration in spring is about the 
same as that of the Chipping Sparrow—late in March or early in 
April. And it also resembles the latter species in not being abun- 
dant until the end of April. The sweet, continuous strain of the 
Vesper Sparrow has often been noted by writers on bird life; yet 
as compared with the matchless melody of the Song Sparrow the 
performance is inferior. Perhaps the plaintive quality of the song 
is its most pleasing feature; sweetness, too, it has to a marked 
degree. This bird is an inhabitant of the outlying fields and the 
pastures, where from fence post or tree near the roadside its strains 
are wafted on the breezes. In the evening several Vesper Sparrows 
may be heard singing in different parts of a farm, and the effect 
of the song at such a time is suggestive of the peacefulness of 


54 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


country life. The bird nests on the ground, but conceals the loca- 
tion so well that few observers ever find the site. This sparrow 
has the habit of running ahead of a person who may approach it; 
and when finally flashed, it always shows in flight the outer white 
tail feathers. In flying, it goes swift and low, with a slightly un- 
dulating movement. 


FIELD SPARROW. 
Spizella pusilla _ 


The Field Sparrow is an early arrival in spring, coming some 
.. years in the last week in March. It begins to sing on the first 
day of its appearance, or rather one will likely hear the bird before 
seeing it. The Field Sparrow inhabits both fields and woods, 
where its plaintive notes may be heard almost continuously. There 
is less variety in the Field Sparrow’s song than in the Vesper’s 
or Song Sparrow’s, but the quality of the notes is hardly less inferior 
to that of those famous songsters. The call-note of this species 
resembles that of the Tree Sparrow. So much alike are these two 
sparrows that beginners will for some time find it difficult to dis- 
tinguish between them. The Field Sparrow departs for the south 
about the same time as the Tree Sparrow arrives here from the north. 
Autumn records of the Field Sparrow are rare after October 15. 
The nest of this bird is placed on the ground, and can be discovered 
by watching the old birds carry food to their young. When the 
fledlings have left the nest, families of Field Sparrows may be 
frequently found. I have noted partial abinoes in this species 
more than in any other. 


CHIPPING SPARROW 


Spizella socialis. 


The Chipping Sparrow usually arrives in the early part of Apil, 
but I have found as many as ten days difference between dates 
of arrival. At first the species is not abundant, being seen mostly 
in pairs or singly. Rarely a small flock of Chipping Sparrows 
may be seen in spring. The note of this sparrow may be heard as 
soon as the bird comes. In quality the song is the least pleasing 
of all the sparrows. But what it lacks in musical powers it more 
than makes up for by its charming disposition. Perhaps there is no 
other bird that is so sociable as the Chipping Sparrow. ‘This 


en Eh CEC EM 


OUR SPARROWS 55 


fearlessness makes it easy to study the species. The nest is usually 
placed low in bushes or small evergreens, where the eggs or young 
may be observed without annoying the old birds. For some un- 
accountable reason many abandoned nests of this species may 
be discovered. In some places the Chipping Sparrow is rarely 
found, and it surprised me to be told by a friend who is an excellent 
observer that this bird is hardly ever seen in what is known as the 
Chicago Area. 


TREE SPARROW. 
Spizella monticola. 


The Tree Sparrow arrives here from the north usually in the 
latter part of October, and remains until early in April. However, 
there are long periods, especially when the snow is deep, in which 
ro Tree Sparrows appear. One winter, after December 5, the 
species was absent 47 days. In winter these sparrows are never 
abundant; small flocks or only several are usually found. In late 
autumn, and especially in early spring, the Tree Sparrow is most 
common. About March 20, the first notes of their beautiful song 
may be heard; it resembles somewhat that of the Goldfinch, 
but is stronger and sweeter. When a number sing together in some 
hedge-row, the effect is very fine. The song season of the Tree 
Sparrow is brief—about three weeks. Some springs when the weather 
is very inclement these birds rarely sing. I remember one spring 
which was so cold that I did not hear the song once. 


WHITE-THROATED SPARROW. 
Zonotrichia albicollts. 


This beautiful sparrow first appears in our latitude about the 
third week in April, and tarries with us until early in May. In 
autumn it returns the first week in October, and stays until the 
end of the month. The White-throats are partial to the 
ground, where they feed among the dead leaves. Here an observer 
may obtain a good view of their markings, which are so harmon- 
iously blended that he can not fail to be pleased with them. Both 
in spring and autumn, the species is probably the most abundant 
of all sparrows. It has a trustful disposition, and will invade city 
parks in great numbers. There is a peculiar, plaintive quality in 
the notes of the White-throated Sparrow, and little variety, so 
that the song is not notably fine. 


56 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


WHITE-CROWNED SPARROW. 
Zonotrichia leucophrys. 


This handsome sparrow is thought by some bird lovers to be 
as beautiful as the White-Throated Sparrow. The erect posture 
the White-Crowned Sparrow takes when perched in some low tree 
or in a hedge gives an observer an excellent opportunity to admire 
the striking appearance of the bird. Its arrival in spring occurs in 
the early part of May, and in autumn about the middle of October. 

Some years I have failed to make any records in autumn, and even 
in spring this species is never common. I have known one good 
observer who never made a record of the White-crowned Sparrow 
in this locality (northern Indiana). The song of this sparrow is 
seldom heard; and while somewhat similar in quality to that of 
the White-throated Sparrow, I think it is fuller and stronger. 


Fox SPARROW. 


Passerella «liaca. 


This is the largest of our sparrows. It arrives early in April, 
and remains two or three weeks before finally disappearing. 
Autumn records of the species are usually rare. I have found the 
Fox Sparrow quite locally distributed; and when its habitat is 
found, the birds may be seen frequently during their stay with us. 
The song may not be heard at all during some springs; but usually 
a regular observer will some cool morning be cheered by the strong, 
musical notes of the Fox Sparrow. 


GRASSHOPPER SPARROW. 


Ammodramus savannarum passerinus. 


This small and somewhat elusive sparrow is an’ inhabitant of — 
clover or alfalfa fields. Here it becomes quite abundant, but 
strange to say is usually over-looked even by keen observers. 
I daresay that rarely will any but the most painstaking persons 
find this species without the help of some one who knows the bird 
well. Its appearance is not remarkable, and a clear view of its 
markings will be necessary to be sure of its identification. I have 
never found the Grasshopper Sparrow before May, but I believe it 
must arrive in April. The note of this sparrow is another difficulty 
to the beginner, for hardly will the uninitiated take the feeble 
utterance of the Grsshopper Sparrow for the song of a bird. 


5 SS UO ES AU 
NOTE 


Contributions on general and midland natural 
history will be. gladly received. Papers on botany 
and allied subjects, zoology, geology and physical. 
geography, should be addressed to the editor, 

Matters relating to advertisements are to be 
taken up with the secretary of the University. 

One hundred reprints of articles averaging 
eight pages or more will be furnished free of charge 
to contributors. More than one hundred separates can 
be obtained at cost price of the extras. When articles 
consist of less than eight pages, a certain number 
of copies of THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST in 
which the paper appeared will be supplied free, or 
the separate articles may, by arrangement with. the 
' editor, be kept until future papers average eight pages, 
provided the contributions are sent in for the next 
consecutive issue for publication. | Contributors of 
articles will receive a free subscription for the year 
in which their paper appears. For further or other 
information address 

THE Eprror, Notre Dame, Indiana. 


AA A AAA SR 


Shenisrienien 


SLA LLL SUR UR URRLG 


aU aU ia ee Ee CT 


Original Old Books. 


ENGELMANN, G. Cactaceae of the Mexican Boundary (1758) Survey. 
75 beautiful plates. 78 pp: Bound separate i..2.02 A $2.50 


Write for information. 


Duplicates for Sale 


PaxtTon’s MAGAZINE OF BoTANy, London, 1834-1840, 1843-1846. 
Vols. 1-7, 10-12 inclusive. 310 volumes. Numerous: hand- 
colored illustrations, exquisitely finished, beautifully bound in 
half leather, tooled in gold. _Not much worn. (Vol. 7 in cloth.) 

Net, 62.5.0; Det. woul tie tok Offaly ede nese elan $15.00 


yf 
“ 
, 
‘ 
a 
yy 

x > 
<$ 
me 

As 
ae 
‘oe ae 
g 
EB 
i 
os 
A 
ie 
es. 

J 

A 


he NO 


th 
= 


The 
University of Notre Dame 


NOTRE. DAME, INDIANA 


College of Arts and Letters. College of Engineering. 


_. Departments of Ancient Classics, ~ Departments of Civil Engineering, 
Modem Literature, History, Mechanical Engineering, 
Political Economy, Sociology, Electrical Engineering, Chemical 

Domestic Commerce, - Foreign Engineering, Mining Engineering, 


| Commerce, Journalism, Library Industrial Engineering. 
Science. ~ : 
College of Science. 


Departments of Chemistry, 
Physics, Biology, Pharmacy, 


Agriculture. College of Fine Arts. 


College of Architecture. Departments of Artistic Drawing, 
Departments ~ of ~ Construction, Painting, Cartooning, Instrumental 
Design. Music, Vocal Music. 


College of Law. 


Preparatory School. St. Edward Hall. 
Variant Courses. For Young Boys. 


Notre Dame is recognized by all educators, by the press and 
by the public as a college whose work is of the same grade as 
that of the most highly endowed colleges or the best state univ- 
sities. Its atmosphere is strongly Catholic and no young man-who 
has ever attended the University of Notre Dame can escape its 
influence in after life. 


The discipline is paternal, and aims at giving young men the 
fullest liberty consistent with earnest study and manly Christian 
character. Rooms at reasonable rates. Catalogue sent on 
application. 


Address: 
THER BGITSTLRAR 


NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


“ee, 
- i Ae 
P a } Sy 
j ; ‘ } mae : 
t SLs "3 ‘ Wi aie, $ 
> : ¥, ‘ : x » f 
: ‘ ij} , i 4 ' iby i 
f Fey ( ‘ t . oe. vst : 
I . ; \ : ‘ f fe 1 . tN i 11) nettle 
a } , er K j Gy, Leah f : 
I wr pe i prs x LEY vieglisg Rv it tra > 
‘ ; te ny ee ee Ee Gey ket aes at 
~ ; es LAA AO (hee We a (pe A UPS Oe Tk, m S 
ya ; ; , y gatt ‘ ¢ ‘ 
: ME ras PPG CeO (FAN EO CSOD 
Ai AS Te ASO Be Sabu sere IAL Pema NEAT NIN ie GED Lb ea) ; 
ANA se ABCA tue eS Fe ih ar om IN ee LE ae Ya Yn bos Spy es Sete poo? \, beta nen ey "i vt 
ts % Ye ei bcuulte OO Pe he eG en Na ‘ yee NaN : s 
~ A fe ie ) Tyra) oe we) 


: 


s $3 A 
Bisa, for oes 3 het “it 
VOL. Vi. SEPTEMBER, 1919 NO.’ s 


3 | : | THE MIDLAND 
NATURALIST 


a Devoted to Natural History, Primarily 
that of the Prairie States 


BaF 


Se 


SP 


rox 


rs oe 


AEG 


hag ns 


e 
Published by the University of Notre Dame, “Wi on 
4 Notre Dame, Indiana [So 


J. A. NIEUWLAND, C.S.C., Phi D., Sc. D., Editor | 
ti 


- 


Ona Ni > * 


a | . CONTENTS 


i= The Missouri Muhlenbergias.—III. Benjamin Franklin Bush 57 


‘Our Flycatchers. Brother Alphonsus, C. S.C. 78 
\ 
" PRICE $1.50 A YEAR _ SINGLE NUMBERS 30 CENTS 


FOREIGN, 6s. 6d. 


Entered as second-class matter at Notre Dame, Indiana. Acceptance for mailing at’special 
rate of postage provided for in section 1103, Act of October 3, 1917, 
authorized on July 3, 1918. 


THE UNIVERSITY PRESS, NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


Ped Ft) i eet a Y ory? A Tae ie TY PA 
x Det lee vay my PAs ree ke Malia 


“Back Nishere of “The American Midland Naturalis.” ate 


Vol. T.-(1905~19 16) 293 Pp : Unbounae A San Mae Na LS rs cha te OE poe 
Vol. II.—(1911-1912). 330 pp. Unbound and exclusive of 3 Reprints 


46 be Dotind in endef Voki ee ore ne Caley f er 


Inclusive of Three Reprints (see below). Lea Ax Me peceeapemapn ets meate she AL! 2.25 
Vol. II1.— (1913-1914). 383 pp. Unbound, exclusive of Reprint No. 4. — 
(See below). [Nos. 1, 2,.3, 7.) are scarce and nearly out of print, 
costing.56 ets: each...2200 2 edb iy peepee pete theses 4.50 
Inclusive of Reprint, No.4,extras.ch Nee ee On 
Vol. IV cr (ro1g 9916). nbotind.' ise ie a sis Mazasste beer e Oho MECN 4,00 
Vol? V{ (1917-1018), Unbound Wie a 3.00 
oud oad 75. 


. 


Publications. 
Hann, W. Analytic Study of Faunal Changes in Indiana, 2 plates, 
LOROG D7 PP awe ee aS ce Ue act a a eee es) eae, 
GREENE, E. L. Leaflets of Botanical Observation aad Crikeant: 
2 vols Complete... (1903-1912) --.22.22222--.--0-----e- 6:00 
ny is Cybele Columbiana, A series of Studies in Botany, 
chiefly North American: No. 1, (Other num- _ 
pers to'follow) 362 SNA ea he ie hy AS tk 


Pittonia, A series of Papers Realting to Botany and 

Botanists, 5 vols. (1887—1905)_..2.---- 2. 14.00. 
ch Flora Franciscana, Parts I, II, III. [Part IV pub- — 
lished leng after the other parts, is quite 
unobtainable, as all copies not immediately 
distributed seem to have been lost in the San - 


Francisco fire.] | Price as published... 2.00 
He tg Manual of the Botany of the Region of San Fran- 
cisco Bay (1894). Bound cloth... 2.00 
Uw esi ah la ea aa Me adv 1.50. 
(Price.as published of latter) 0.022. ..cc cecil 2.00 
UTTERBACK, W. I. Naiades of Missouri, 200 pp. 29 pl. and some text Baz 
figiimwess: f.7 Bn USE age ele ee MA eaten 1.7 er 
Reprints. 
RAFINESQUE, C.'S... Neogenyton, (1825) os $ 225 
“5 43 The Natural Family of the Carexides (1840)........ 50 
” id Scadiography or 100 Genera of Ombclliferous 
Plantssetes (WS 40p ese ed eg i eae 1.50 


Monographie des Coquilles Bivalves et Fluvia- 
tiles de la Riviere Ohio. Remarques sur les 
Rapports Naturels des Genres Viscum, Samolus 
et Viburnum. A Bruxelles (1820)-....220.022...-.-.- 1.50 
LEConTE, J. B. Reprints of Monographs without plates, $2.50; with 
42 photographic copies of unpublished plates 
(7x8), $25.00; with colored photographic plates...$37.50 
LeConts, J. E. Two extra plates reproduced from originals in N. Y. 
Bot. Garden. Colored, $1.50; tuncolored-............- 1.00 


; The American Midland Naturalist 


PUBLISHED BI-MONTHLY BY THE UNIVERSITY 
OF NOTRE DAME, NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


VOI Vil: SEPTEMBER, tro19. NO+5; 


The Missouri Muhlenbergias.---IIl. 


BY BENJAMIN FRANKLIN BUSH! ». 

Towa: ay isnne eae 
Ames, Ball 113, August 5, 1896, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79950; 
Ames, Ball 113, August 5, 1896, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79904; 
Ames, Hitchcock, August, 1889, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79922; 
Ames, Hitchcock, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79960; 
Armstrong, B. S., September, 1895, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79749 
Armstrong, Cratty, August 21, 1897, M. B. G. Herb. No. 


79910; 
Dakota City, Pammel, August 8, 1896, M. B. G. Herb. No. 


79951; 
Iowa City, Hitchcock, August, 1888, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79911; 
Ledyard, Pammel and Cratty 760, August 28, 1897, M. B. G. 

Herb. No. 79921; 

Ledyard, Pammel and Cratty 760, August 28, 1897, M. B. G. 

Herb. No. 79925; 

Ledyard, Pammel and Cratty 760, August 28, 1897, M. B. G. 

Herb. No. 80106; 

Ledyard, Pammel and Cratty 760, August 28, 1897; 

Mount Pleasant, Mills 13, 1894, M. B. G. No. 79927; 
Muscatine, Mackenzie 781, September 26, 1894; 

Sioux City, Wakefield, August 30, 1887, M. B. G. Herb. No. 

79949; 

Tabor, Pammel 778, September 20, 1897, M. B. G. No. 79906; 
Tabor, Pammel 778, September 20, 1897, M. B. G. Herb. 


No. 79917; 
Webster City, Pammel 274, June 15, 1895, M. B. G. Herb 


No. 79948; ¢ 


58 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


West Union, Whitmere 248, July 6, 1896, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79947; 
Winterset, Carver, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79924. 
WISCONSIN : 
LaCrosse, Hale, 1861, M. B..G. Herb. No. 75629; 
Mirror Lake, Eggert, August, 24, 1903, M. B- Ge Herb Ne 
82672; 
' Prairie du Chien, Hale, 1861, M. B. G. Herb. No. 75648; 
St. Croix, Hale, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79956; 
St. Croix, collector not given, but probably Hale, date not 
given, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79699. 
MINNESOTA: 
Detroit, Seymour, August 24, 1884, U. TL. Hebe 
Lake Minnetonka, Glaifelter, October 3, 1898, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 80089; 
Sandy Lake, Sandberg 783, August 12, 1891, U. Ill. Herb.; 
Spirit Lake, Geyer, September, 1838, M. B. G. Herb, No: 
79685. 


KANSAS: 
Manhattan, Norton, September, 1893,.M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79926; 
Manhattan, Norton, October 22, 1892, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79940; 
Riley County, Norton 596, September 3, 1895, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79946. 


NEBRASKA: 
Along the Missouri to the Mountains, Hayden, July 8, 1854, 
M. B. G. Herb. No. 79681: 
Fort Union, Hayden, 1855, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79684; 
Fort Union, Hayden, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. No. 


79964; 
Nuckolls County, Hedgcock 348, July, 1886, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79807; 
Nuckolls County, Hedgcock, July 3, 1899, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79806; 


Omaha, Eastman, October 1, 1915, U. Ill. Herb.; 

Thomas County, Rydberg 1762, September 13, 1893, U. Ill. Herb. 

Without definite locality, Hayden, 1853-54, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 82657. 


ek a 
w 


TE RR 


ee a ee Eee Sa eae ae eee 


MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS 59 


DAKOTA: 
Without definite locality, Vasey, 1888, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79912. 
SoutH DakoTa: 
Brookings, White, August 3, 1908, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79802; 
Brookings, White, August 3, 1908, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79803. 
NortH DaKkotTa: , 
Benson County, Lunell, August 5, 1906; 
Benson County, Lunell, August 26, 1906, U.S. A. Herb.; 
Fargo, Seymour, August 23, 1884, U.S. A. Herb.; 
Grand Falls, Brannon, 52, July 1, 1886, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79905; | 
Lake Ibsen, Lunell, July'29, 1900, U. S. Herb. No. 746130. 
ALABAMA: 
Without definite locality, buckley, date not given. M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 79955. 


OKLAHOMA: 
Snyder, Eggert, September 19, 1903, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
82673; 
Snyder, Eggert, September 18, 1903, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
82674. ; 
‘TEXAS: * 


Without definite locality, Reverchon 1677, October 25, 1874, 
M. B. G. Herb. No. 80108. 
NEw MExiIco: 
Animas Creek, Metcalfe, 1142, July 13, 1904, M. G. B. Herb. 


No. 79801; 

Animas Creek, Metcalfe, 1142, July 13, 1904, M. B. G. Herb. 
No 79824; 

Dona Ana County, Wooton and Standley 3342, September 25, 
1908; 

Lucero’s Ranch, Ellis 18, August 10, 1914, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 760268; 

Mesilla Park, Standley, September 29, 1906, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 80103; 

Picos, Standley, 4921, August 15, 1908, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79823; 


River Mimbres, Bigelow, November 5, 1851, M. B.G. Herb. No. 
79966; 


60 


THE AMERICAN MIDILAND NATURALIST | 


Without definite locality, Fendler,965,1847, M. B.G. Herb. No. 
79682 ; 

Without definite locality, Fendler, 966, 1847, M. G. B. Herb. 
No. 79683; 

Without definite locality, Fuller, date not given, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 78953; 

Without definite locality, Wright 1888, 1851-52, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 79680. 


COLORADO: 


Black Cafion, Baker 686, August 11, 1901, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79918; 

Boulder Cafion, Daniels 526, August 21, 1906, No. B. G. Herb. 

_ No. 80077; 

Brighton, Johnston 389A, September 15, 1908, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 80102; 

Cafion City, Brandegeé 3457, 1872, M. B. G. Herb. No: 79725; 

Cafion City, Brandegee 970, 1874, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79724; 

Colorado Springs, Chase™5279, August 28 to September 5, 
T9e@8; U.S; 4. erp: 

Deer Run, Baker 910, August 21, 1901, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79919; 

Denver, Holm September 14, 1889, U.S. A. Herb.; 

Denver, Holm, August 6, 1898, U.S. A. Herb.; 

Denver, Holm, July 15, 1899, M. B. G. Herb. No. 778843; 

Fort Collins, Pammel, June 29, 1896, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79952; 

Fort Collins, collector not given, October 2, 1896, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 79945; 

Manitou, Glatfelter, September 9, 1905, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
80087 ; 

Manitou, Glatfelter, September 9, 1905, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
8o1I21; 

Manitou, Letterman, August 11, 1884, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
772774; 

Mountain Valley, Brandegee 603, August, 1873, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79724; 

Rocky Mountains, Hall, 1862, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79910. 


WYOMING: 


Sundance Mountain, Chase 5270, August 25, 1908, U. S. A. 
Herb. 


’ 
} 
' 
| 
‘ 
¥ 


{ 
MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS 61 


MONTANA: 
Billings, Seymour, September 4, 1884, U.S. A. Herb. 
WASHINGTON: 
Spokane County, Suksdorf 947, July 12, 1889, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79959; 
Without definite locality, BIEN: date not given, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79916; 
Without definite locality, collector and date not given, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 79928. 
ARIZONA: 
Nagle’s Ranch, Jones 6056, September 20, 1894) Mi Butt. 
Herb. No. 80073; 
St. John’s, i iad 5182, August 9, 1903, U.S. A. Herb. 
NEVADA: 
Humboldt Pass, Watson 1288, September, 1868, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 79613. 
UTAH: 
Without definite locality, Jones 6033, 1894, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79942. 
7. MUHLENBERGIA CommuratTa (Scribner) Bush, n. sp. 
Muhlenbergia M exicana commutata Scribner. Rhodora 9: 
LO. O07. 
‘“Panicles much longer and larger than those of M. MEXICANA: 


lemmas awned; awns 4-10 mm. long; otherwise much as in M. 
Mexicana.” 


New York, Delaware, Pennsylvania, Illinois dud Minnesota, 


Scribner, 1. c. 


Vermont and New York to South Dakota, south to Virginia, 


Nebraska, Missouri and Oklahoma. 
SPECIMENS EXAMINED: 


VERMONT: 
» Rutland, Kirk, 974, September 9, 1913, U. S.. Herb. No. 
725390- 
NEw YorRK: 
Fulton, Rowlee, August, 1888, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79739; 
Oxford, Coville, August 29, 1884, U. S. Herb. No. 295258. 
ONTARIO: 
Gault, Herriot, 80, August 31, 1901, U. S. Herb. No. 952416; 
Pelee Point, Macoun 26245, August 5, r901, U. S. Herb. No. 
952415. 


THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


NEW JERSEY: ‘ 
Hoboken, collector and date not given, U.S. Herb. No. 746217. 
PENNSYLVANIA: 
Easton, Garber, 1890, U.S. Herb. No. 265677; 
Susquehanna, Aneucker 315, August, 1901, U. S. Herb. No. 
587196; ‘ 
Susquehanna, Porter, August 8, 1895, U. S. Herb. No. 952387; 
Susquehanna, Kneucker 315, August, 1901, M. B. G. Herb. ~ 
No. 79740. 
VIRGINIA: 
Bedford County, Curtiss, September, 1873, U. S. Herb. No. 
746218; 
Bedford County, Curtiss, September, 1873, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79727. 
ILLINOIS: : 
Peoria, McDonald, September, 1900, U. S. Herb. No. 746214; 
Wady Petra, Chase,1540, August 4, 1907, U. 5. Herb. No. 
645418; 
Without definite locality, Wolf, 1882, U. S. Herb. No. 952377. 
MIssouUrRI: 
Gates, Standley, 9382, August 26, 1912, U. S. Herb. No. 
688208, in part, the plant marked B on this sheet; 
Whiteside, Davis, 1030, September 11, 1911, U. S. Herb. No. 
673932. 
MICHIGAN: 
South Lockwood, Dodge 17, October 2, 1911, U. S. Herb. No. 
952373- 
Iowa: 
Iowa Lake, Beatty, August 27, 1897, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75587; 
Johnson County, Snyder, September, 1886, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 75604. : 
Mount Pleasant, Mills 860, August, 1897, U. S. Herb. No. 
328712. 
MINNESOTA: 
Fort Snelling, Mearns 749, September 1, 1891, U. S. Herb. 
No. 952392. 
N EBRASKA: 
Weeping Water, Williams, date not given, U. S. Herb. No. 


952390. 


SO eee 


a Re Ee ee nT ee Eee 


oo Bena < Wye 


MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS 63 


SouTtH DAKkoTAa: 
_ Iroquois, collector not given, August 15, 1874, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79708; 
Tacoma Park, Griffiths 780, September 11,1897, U. S. Herb. 
No. 79708; 
Tacoma Park, Griffiths 780, September 11, 1897, U. S. Herb. 
No. 952394. 
OKLAHOMA: 
Verdigris, Bush 770, August 2, 1894, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79633; 
Verdigris, Bush 771, October 5, 1894, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79632. 
8. MUHLENBURGIA GLABIFLORA Scribner, Rhodora 9: 22. 1917. 
Culms terete, very minutely scabrous for a short distance below 
the nodes; panicles 2-6 cm. long, occasionally somewhat glomerate, 
the closely flowered short branches appressed, usually ‘partly 
enclosed in the subtending leaf-sheaths; spikelets ovate-lanceolate ; 
glumes lanceolate, acute or acuminate-pointed, subequal, a little 
shorter than, as long as, or a little longer than the lemma, scabrous 
on the keel excepting near the base; lemmas ovate or oblong, 
obtuse or submucronate-pointed, scabrous on the heel and lateral 
nerves above, otherwise smooth, no hair at the base; palea ovate- 
oblong, obtuse, equalling on a little shorter than the lemma. 
Pennsylvania and Maryland, west to Illinois, Missouri and Texas 
SPECIMENS EXAMINED: 
PENNSYLVANIA: 
Wissahickan Creek, Smith 84, August, U.S. Herb. No. 952386 
MARYLAND: 
Hyattsville, Scribner, 1888, U.S. Herb. No. 746131. 
ILLINOIS: 
Mascoutah, Welsch, 1862-1871, U. S. A. Herb.; 
Taylorville, Andrews, September 10, 1898, U. S. A. Herb. 
MIssourt: . 
St. Louis, Engelmann, 1842, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79662. 
g. MUNBLENBERGIA Mexicana (L.) Trin. Gram. Unifl. 189. 
1824. 
Agrostis Mexicana L,. Mant. 1: 31. 1767. 
Agrostts laterflora Michx. Fl. Bor. Am. 1: 53. 1803. 
Agrostis clandestina Sprengel, Mont. 1: 32. 1807. 
Cinna Mexicana (1,.) Beauv. Agrost. 32. 158. 1812. 


64 


THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Trichochloa Mexicana (1,.) Grin. Fund. Agrost. 117. 1820. 

Muhlenbergia clandestina (Spreng.) Trin. Gram. Unifl. 190. 
1824. ; 

Muhlenbergia polystachya Scribner, 1. c. 1907, not of Mac- 
kenzie and Bush, 1902. 

Muhlenbergia polystachya , Hicehnecks Gray’s New Manual, 
60, 7.1275 5008, Not: MiI&. BB: 

Mutklenbergia foliosa Nash, Britton and Brown, Illustrated 
Flora, 2nd ed. 185. 1913, not M. foliosa rin. 1824. 

Muhlenbergia Mexicana Trin., Bush in Flora of Jackson County 
Missouri, No. 862, 1885; ‘Tracy in Flora of Missouri, No. 
1642, 1886; Eggert in Catalogue of Plants of St. Louis, 
Missouri, 1891. 

Muhlenbergia Mexicana (I,.) Trin., Mackenzie and Bush 
in Manual of the Flora of Jackson County, Missouri, No. 
2, 1902, Palmer in Catalogue of Plants of Jasper County, 
Missouri, Nos. 1388, 2686, 2797, 3463, 3467 and 3475, 1916. 

Muhlenbergia Mexicana filuformis Vasey, Bush in Flora of 
Jackson County, Missouri, No. 863. 1885. 

Muhlenbergia Mexicana filiformis Gray. Eggert in Catalogue 
of Plants of Saint Louis, Missouri, 1891. 

Muhlenbergia Mexicana filiformis Muhl., Tracy in Flora of 
Missouri, No. 1644, 1886. 


N. B. to Ont. S. Dak. and’southward, Hitchcock in Manual. 
N. B. to W. Ont., N. Car., Tenn., Nebr. and the Ind. Terr., 


Nash in Flora. 


N. B. to Wyo., S. Dak., N. Car., and Texas, Nash in Illustrated 


Flora. 


Massachusetts to North Dakota, south to Alabama and north- 


eastern ‘Texas. 


SPECIMENS EXAMINED: 


MASSACHUSETTS: 


Granville, Seymour 2, September 15, 1913, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
746678; 

Norquit, Sturtevant, August 31, 1888, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75588; 
South Warmington, Sturtevant September 11, 1890, M. B. G. 

Herb. No. 75577; 
South Warmington, Sturtevant, September 11, 1890, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 75576; 


: 
f 
} 
¥ 


4 


qe tey 


et ves 


# 
* ; 
\ 
‘ 


MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS 65 


South Warmington, Sturtevant, Per eeD £7, 1890,. Me B.G. 
Herb. No. 75575; 
Walpole, Greenman, 3236, September 26, 1897, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 742290. 
CONNECTICUT: 
South Canaan, Greenman -3229, October 3, 1897, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 742285. 
Irvin Lakes, Greenman 2453, September 25, 1910, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 738434. 
New York: 
Bergen, collector not given, August 30, 1915, U. S. A. Herb.; 
Buffalo, Clinton 9272, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75572; 
Ithaca, Pearce, October 6, 1883, U. S. Herb. No. 152897; 
Ithaca, Treleare, August 19, 1878, M. B. G. Herb. No. 75605; 
Lebanon Springs, Harrison, September 25, 1890, U. S. Herb. 


No. 952387: 
New York, Coville, September 24, 1884, W..8.+ Herbs No: 
295257; 


New York, Gerard, 1882, U.S. Herb. No. 952388; 
Western New York, Gray, date not etven, M.B.G. Herb. No. 
75626. 
ONTARIO: 
Fredericktown, Fowler, 1878, U.S. Herb. No. 259605; 
Gault, Herriott 81, August 31, 1901, U. S. Herb. No. 952412. 
NEW JERSEY: 
Sussex County, Mackenzie 2434, October 16, 1906, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 75668. 
DELAWARE: 
Centreville, Commons, October L879) ME. is Gr Ler eae 
75579. 
PENNSYLVANIA: 
Easton, Porter, September 2, 1895, U. S. Herb. No. 952385; 
Germantown, Scribner, September 28, 1875, U. S. Herb. No. 
746128; . . 
Graeff’s Landing, Heller 4815, September 14, 1901, U. S. Herb. 
No. 4406273; 
Graeff’s Landing, Heller, September 14, 1901, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 75642; 


THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Lancaster, Heller 4819, September 12, 1900, U. S. Herb. No. 
406277; 

Lancaster, Small, date not given, U. S. Herb. No. 746125; 

Lancaster, Small, May, 1891, U.S. Herb. No. 298410; 

Mountville, Eby, July 8, 1891, M. B. G. Herb. No. 75633; 

Philadelphia, Digyn, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79975; i 

Philadelphia, Scribner 105, September, 1875, U. S. Herb. N3. 
746128; 

Westchester, Deane, date not given, U. S. Herb. No. 746116; 

Westchester, Deane, 1827, M. B. G. Herb. No. 82681; 

Williamsport, McMinn, 1867, U.S. Herb. No. 952384. 

MARYLAND: 

Chevy Chase, Mosher, September 15, 1915, U. S. A. Herb.; 

Great Falls cof the Potomac, Pall 73, September 4, 1899, 
Uo Ss Herb.” No. 652406; 

Great Falls of -the Potomac, Ball 73, September 4, 1898, 
M. B. G. Herb: Noi..75589. 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: 

Deanewocod, Chase 3006 1-2, September 9, 1905, U. S. Herb. 
No. 746115; 

Deanewood, Chase 3006 1-2, September 9, 1905, U.S. A. Herb. 

High Island, Dewey 121, September 7, 1894, U. S. Herb. No. 


491691; 

High Island, Dewey 121, September 7, 1894, U. 8. Herb. No. 
490690; 

Hyattsville, Holm, September 18, 1897, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
779206; 


Long Bridge, Blanchard, September 28, 1891, U. S. Herh. 
No. 311999; 

Mount Pleasant, Chase 279, September 7, 1905, U. S. Herb. 
No. 952405; 

Potomac Flats, ball 712, October 20, 1906, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
952407 ; 

Washington, Wheeler, September 20, 1906, U. S. Herb. No. 
952404. 

OHIO: 

Athens, Ball, September 21, 1902, U. S. Herb. No. 952382; 

Central Ohio, Sullivant, date not given, M. G. G. Herb. No. 
75624; 


MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS 67. 


~ 


Cincinnati, Lloyd 574, September 16, 1890, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75624; 

Cleveland, Greenman 3249, July 29, 1896, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
742082; 

Liverpool, Holm, September 18, 1912, U.S. A. Herb.; ° 

London, Sharp 6790, September, October, U. S. Herb. No. 
952383; 

Sheffield, Ricksecker 203, September 25, 1901, U. S. Herb. No. 
217632; 

st. Marys, Kneucker 203, September 25, 1901, U. S. Herb, No. 
557160; 

St. Marys, Kneucker 203, September 25, 1901, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 75582. 

VIRGINIA: 

Waterloo, Pollard 757, October 18, 1895, U.«S. Herb. No. 
307244; 

Without definite locality, Pech, date not given, U. S. Herb. 
No. 952408. 

WEST VIRGINIA: 
Aurora, Steele and Steele, August 30, 1898, U. S. Herb. No. 


359404 ; 
Goose Creek, Donnell-Smith, September 8, 1879, U. S. Herb. 


No. 490294; 
Sweet Springs, Steele and Steele 317, September 15, 1903, 
Mab. Gi Herb. No. 75583 ; 
Sweet Springs, Steele and Steele 317, September 15, 1898, U.S. 
Herb. No. 490294. 
INDIANA: 
Clark County, collector and date not given, U. S. Herb. No. 
722787; ; 
Lafayette, Dorner 222, September 15, 1901, U. S. Herb. No. 
952381; 
Russellville, Grimes 790, September 11, 1911, U. S. Herb. No. 
952380; 
Wells County, Deam, September 12, 1897. 
‘TENNESSEE: 
Knoxville, Ruth 807, June, 1888, M. B. G. Herb. No. 75567. 
KENTUCKY: 
Bell County, Kearney 366, September, 1893, U. S. Herb. No, 
952418; 


THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


\ 


Bell County, Kearney 366, September, 1893, U.S. Herb. No. 


746132; 
Bell County, Kearney 366, September, 1893, U. S. Herb. No. 
822929; 
Wasiota, Kearney 366, September, 1883, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75631; : | 
Without definite locality, Short, 1840, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75607. 
ILLINOIS: % 
Kankakee, Crampton 547, September 11, 1913, U. S. Herb. s 
No. 750683; | i 


Mascontah, Welsch, 1867-1871, U.S. A. Herb.; 
Mount Carmel, Schneck, 1879, U. S. Herb. No. 952373; 


Mount Carmel, Schneck, October, 1879, U. S. A. Herb.; 4 
Mount Carmel, Schneck, September 25, 1881, U. S. A. Herb.; f 
Mount Carmel, Schneck, September 8, 1879, U. S. A. Herb; 4 
Peoria, Brendel, date not given, U.S. A. Herb.; ; 


Taylorville, Andrews, August 2, 1888, U. S. A. Herb.; 
Taylorville, Andrews, September 12, 1858, U. S. A. Herb.; 
Urbana, Gates, October 6, 1907, U. S. Herb. No. 645175; 
Urbana, Gibbs, September 26, 1898, U. S. A. Herb.; 

Urbana, Gibbs September 27, 1888, U.S. A. Herb.; 

Wabash County, Schneck, September 18, 1880, U. S. A. Herb.; 
Wabash ,County Schneck, September 18, 1880. U.S. Herb. 


No. 746117; 

Wady Patra, Chase 200, August 31, 1888, U. S. Herb. No. 
746123; 

Wady Petra, Chase 200, August 31, 1888, U.S. Herb. No. 
952378; 


Wady Petra, Chase 1166, September 25, 1904, U. S. Herb. 
No. 952373: 7 

Wady Petra, Chase 1166, September 25, 1904, U. S. Herb. 
No. 580931; 

Wady Petra, Chase 1267, September 23, 1806, U. S. Herb. No. 
952374; 

Without definite locality, Engelmann, August, 1883, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 79660, the plant marked 1 on this sheet, but I 
can not be sure that the label cited belongs to the plant 
marked 1, 


MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS 69 


MISSOURI: 

Aberden, Davis 963, September 11, 1911, M. B. G. Herb. No. 

7909401, 
Aberden, Davis September 24, 1911, M. B. G. Herb. No. 

\ 799375; 
Allenton, Letterman, August, 1879, M. B. G. Herb. No. 

772776; 
Clarksville, Davis 1117, September 24, 1911, U. S. Herb. No. 

673972; 
Clarksville, Davis, September 24, 1911, M. B. G. Gerb. No. 

709316; 


Clay County, Mackenzie 790, September 21, 1895, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 75677; 

Clay County, Mackenzie 945, September 21, 1895; 

Courtney, Bush 1154, September 10, 1901, M. B. G. Herb. 

y No. 75568; 

; Creve Coeur Lake, Glatfelter September 11, 1894, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 75654; 

Creve Coeur Lake, Glatfelter, September 17, 1900, M. B. G. 

; Herb. No. 75655; 

4 Creve Coeur Lake, Kellogg 29, September 25, 1901, U, S. 
Herb. No. 950197; 

Dodson, Hoffman September 10, 1916; 

Dodson, Hoffman September 10, 1916; 

Dodson, Mackenzie, May 8, 1875, M. B. G. Herb. No. 75676; 

Forest: Park, Glatfelter 613, September 20, 1891, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 75653; 

Forest Park, Glatfelter 643, September 20, 1891, M. B. G. Herb. 
ING. 750uas. My 

Gates, Standley 9382, August 26, 1912, U. S. Herb. Ne. 688288, 
in part, the plant marked A on this sheet; 

Hannibal, Davis 1106, September 19, 1911, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 709121; 


Hannibal, Davis 1106, September 19, 1911, U. S. Herb. No. 
673964; 

Hannibal, Davis 1410, October 18, 1911, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
708745; 

Jackson County, Bush 1726, September 14, 1890, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 75673; 


7O 


THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Jackson County, bush 1880, September 14, 1890, M. B. G. . 


Herb. No. 75675; 

Jackson County Bush September 27, 1893, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 75678; 

Jasper, Palmer 1388, September 12, 1909, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75670; 

Jasper, Palmer 1388, September 12, 1909, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
756904; 

Jefferson Barracks, Eggert September 4, 1877, M. B. B. Herb. 
No. 739682; 

Jefferson Barracks, Eggert, September 4, 1897, M. B. G. Herb. 

’ No. 75658; 

Jefferson Barracks, Eggert September 4, 1877, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 739940; 

Kansas City, Stigall 49, October 20, 1902, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75672; . 

Lee’s Summit, Mackenzie 419, September 9, 1901; 

McDonald County, Bush, September 1, 1893, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 75672; 

Oakwood, Davis 130, October 6, 1911, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
756896; 

Scotland, Palmer 2686, September 12, 1909, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 75652; 

Scotland, Palmer 2686, September 12, 1909, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 757605; 

Shannon County, Bush, October 21, 1893, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75671; 

Shannon County, Bush, October 21, 1893, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75973; 

Sheffield, Mackenzie 563, October 18, 1901; 

Sibley, Mackenzie 563, October 2, 1901; 

Springfield, Weller 53, September 13, 1890, U. S. Herb. No. 
950196; 

St. Louis, Eggert 223a, October 7, 1897, U. S. Herb. No. 
950195; 

St. Louis, Pammel, October, 1886, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79335; 

St. Louis County, Eggert, September 11, 1897, M. B. G. Herb. 

No. 75640; 

St. Louis County, Eggert, September 11, 1877, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 739939; 


tee Set 


— 
iow 


MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS 7s 


St. Louis County, Eggert, September 11, 1877. M. B. G. Herb. 

No. 739388 ; 

St. Louis County, Eggert, September 11, 1877, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 75657; 

St. Louis County, Eggert, September 11, 1877, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 75641; 

Swan, Bush 460, September 24, 1899, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75574; 

Swope Park, Mackenzie 437, September 13, 1901; 

Turner, Standley 9851, September 5, 1912, U. S. Herb. No. 
688766; 

Webb City, Palmer 2797, September 29, 1909, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 75656; 

Webb City, Palmer 2757, September 29, 1909, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 756902; 

Webb City, Palmer 3463, September 17, 1911, U.S. A. Herb.; 

Webb City, Palmer 3463, September 17, 1911, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 709108; 

Webb City, Palmer 3463, September 17, 1911, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 756899; , 

Webb City, Palmer 3463, September 17, 1911, M. B. G. Herb. 

No. 709021; 

Webb City, Palmer 3463, September 17, 1911, M. B. G. Herb. 

No. 756900; 

Webb City, Palmer 3475, September 17, 1911, M. B. G. Herb. 

No. 709006; 

Webb City, Palmer 3475, September 17, 1911, M. B. G. Herb. 

No. 756903; 

Webb City, Palmer 3475, September 17, 1911, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 756901; 

Whiteside, Davis 1030, September 11, 1911, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 709077; 

Whiteside, Davis to10, September 11, r911, M. B. G. Herb. 
No: 709228;>. | 
Whiteside, Davis 1ro11, September 11, 1911, U. S. A. Herb.; 
Whiteside, Davis 1030, September 11, 1911, U. S. Herb No. 

673932; 
Whiteside, Davis to11, September 11, 1911, U. S. Herb. No. 
673925; 


THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Without definite locality, collector not given, August, 1881, 
M. B. G. Herb, No. 75625. 
NORTH CAROLINA: 
Biltmore, Biltmore Herbarium 657b, September 12, 1898, 
M.B.G..Herb. No. '75603; é 
Biltmore, Biltmore Herbarium 657b, September 12, 1898, U.S. 
Herb. No. 335376; 
Magnetic City, Wetherby 24, September 20, 1895, U. S. Herb. 
No 952410; 
Mountains of North Carolina, Boynton, 1888, U. S. Herb. 
No. 852411; 
Without definite locality, Boynton, date not given, U. S. Herb... 
No. 746129. 
Iowa: 
Amana, Schadt 657, September 21, 1897, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75601 ; 
Carroll, Simon 1018, September 21, 1897, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
% vemsO35; 
Chariton, Mallory 799, October 2, 1897, U. S. Herb. No. 
75634; , 
Dakota City, Pammel 211, August 8, 1896, M. B. G. Herb. 


No. 79615; 

De Witt; Pammel 1451, September 9, 1898, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75593; . 

Dixon, Snyder 734, September 21, 1897, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75602; 


Iowa City, Hitchcock, 1889, M. B. G. Herb. No. 75584; 

Iowa City, Hitchcock, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75622; . 

Iowa City, Hitchcock, date not given, U. S. Herb. No. 733277; 

Iowa City, Somes 3868, September 9, 1909, U. S. Herb. No. 
672490; 

Mount Ayr, Beard 638, September 25, 1897, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 75595; 

Mount Pleasant, Mills, 1894, M. B. G. Herb. No. 75620; 

Mount Pleasant, Mills, 1894, U. S. Herb. No. 952397; 

Mount Pleasant, Mills, 1894, M. B. G. Herb. No. 75598; 

Mount Pleasant, Mills, 1894, U. S. Herb. No. 952397; 

Mount Pleasant, Mills, 1894, U.S. Herb. No. 952398; 

Mount Pleasant, Mills, 1894, U. S. Herb. No. 952399; 


' MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS tay a 


Mount Pleasant, Mills 17, 1894, M. B. G. Herb. No. 75599; 

‘Mount Pleasant, Mulls 17, 1894, M. B. G. Herb. No. 75597; 

Mount Pleasant, Mills 860, 1897; 

Mount Pleasant, Mills 860, August, 1897, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 75596; 

Mount Pleasant, Mills 860, August, 1897, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 75600; 

Mount Pleasant, Mills 860, August, 1897, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 75680; 

Mount Pleasant, Mills 860, August ,1897, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75663; | 

Muscatine, Reppert, September 6, 1887, M. B. G. “Herb. No. 
75616; | . 

Sheldahl and Slater, Pammel- 1465, September 17, 1898, 
M. B. G. Herb. No. 75591; 

Turin, Pammel, September 8, 1894, U. S. Herb. No. 746124. 


inemenor 


Detroit, Seymour, August 22, 1884, U.S. A. Herb.; 

Fort Snelling, Mearns 771, August 31, 1891, U. S. Herb. No. 
952391; 

Houston County, Freiburg, July, 1912, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
763870; 

“St, Cloud, amene £877, 'U. 8. Herb. No. 952393. 


KANSAS: 


Cullison, Norris 218, Se ntanee 1887, M. B. G. Herb«No. 
79833; 

Manhattan, Hitchcock 3836, September 27, 1908, U.S. A. Herb. 
No. 952402; 

Manhattan, Hitchcock 3836, September 27, 1908, U.S. A. Herb. 

Manhattan, Hitchcock 3844, September 27, 1908, U. S. Herb. 
No. 952403; 

Manhattan, Norton, October 11, 1892, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75608 ; 

Manhattan, Novigh, October 2, 1887, M. B. G. Herb.-N>. 
75609 ; 

McFarland, Hitchcock 7831, October 17, 1910, U. S. Herb. 
No. 952400; 

Riley County, Norton 592a, September 9, 1895, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 75614; 


74 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Riley County, Norton 597a, September 9, 1895, U. S. Herb. 
No. 353373; 
Rockport, Bartholomew, September 12, 1889, M. B. G. Herb. 
No.4767491. 
NEBRASKA: 
Omaha, Eastman, September 14, 1915, U. S. A. Herb. 
SoutH DAKOTA: 
Oak Lake, Griffiths and Schlosser August, sett U:.S: Herb, 
No. 210915; 
Pearl Creek, Thornber, August 15, 1894, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75659; 
Sioux Falls, Zhornber August ,1882, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75032; 
Trent, Ball and Ball, September 26, 1903, U. S. Herb. No. 
952395. 
NortH DakoTa: 


Fargo, Waldron; August 14, 1890, U. S. Herb, No. 952396; 


Fargo, Waldron and Moons, August 20, 1901, U. S. Herb. No. 
4.06356; 
Pembina, Havard 3, date not given, U. S. Herb. No. 152896. 
ALABAMA: 
Without definite locality, Buckley, September, 1841, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 79664. 
ARKANSAS: 
Fulton, Bush 980, Pecos ws 19, 1900, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75588. 
OKLAHOMA: 
Ottawa, Stevens 2458, August 27, 1913, U.S. A. Herb. ; 
Sapulpa, Bush 772, September 21, 1894, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75610, 
Sapulpa, Bush 1396, September 27, 1895,.M. B. G. Herb. No. 
750E2); 
Stillwater, Waugh, September 6, 1893, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75611; 
Stillwater, Waugh 2146, September 27, 1893, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 75613. 
TEXAS: 
Dallas, Reverchon 1054, October 1880, U. 5. Herb. No. 822932, 
labelled M. MEXICANA FILIFORMIS by Reverchon, and M. 
FOLIOSA AMBIGUA by Hitchcock. 


4% inched. og sReccites » 


eng, 


“Sts > re oe ay 


| 
4 


MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS 75 


Dallas, Reverchon 2330, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
82679; 

Dallas, Reverchon 2330, date not given, M. B. G. Herb No. 
75538; . 

Dallas, Reverchon 2330, date not given, M. B. G. Herb No. 
75568; 

Granbury, Reverchon 4110, September 7, 1903, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 75664; 

Without definite locality, Keverchon 1054, date not given, M. 
B. G. Herb. No. 75661. 


10. MUHLENBERGIA FOLIOSA Trin. Gram. Unifl. 190. 1824. 


Agrostis. filiformis Willd. Enum. Hort. Berol. 1: 95. 1809, 

Agrostis filiformis Sprengel 1802. 

Agrostis foliosa hortulana R. &.S. 2: 373. 1817. 

Agrostis filiujormts Muhl. Gram. 66. 1817, not Agrostis filuformis 
Sprengel 1802. 

Trichochloa Coliosa Trin. Fund. Agrost. 117. 1820. 

Cinna filiformis (Willd.) Link, Enum. Mort. Berol. 1: 70. 1821. 

Agrostis lateriflora filiformis (Willd.) Torr. Fl. 1: 86. 1824. 

Muhlenbergia Mexicana filiformis (Willd.) Scribner, Mem. 
ore. Chib: 52267 194. 

Muhlenbergia Mexicana of American authors in large part, 
not ‘T'rinius 1824. 

Muhlenbergia Mexicana Nash in part in Ilusttated Flora, 
not of ‘Trinins 1824. 

Muhlenbergia ambigua Hitcheock in part in Manual, not M. 
AMBIGUA ‘Torrey 1843. 


Me. to Ont. S. Dak. and southward, Hitchcock in Manual. 
Not recognized by Nash in Flora. 


Not recognized by Nash in Illustrated Flora. 


Maine and Quebec, westward to North Dakota and Wyoming, 
southward to North Carolina and Arizona. 
SPECIMENS EXAMINED: 


MAINE: 


Auburn, Merrill 13, August, 1898, U. S. Herb. No. 952483; 
Bangor, Knight 3, August 7, 1904, U. S. Herb. No. 952474; 
Bradley, Briggs 10, September, 1891, U. S. Herb. No. 952479; 
Brownfield, Merrill 18, August, 24, 1896, U. S. Herb. No. 


952484; 


76 


THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 

Cumberland, Chamberlain 453, September 6, 1902, U. S. Herb. 
No. 746194; 

Dover, Fernald 526, September, 1891, U. S. Herb. No. 952480; 

Foxcraft, Fernald 523, September 5, 1894, U. S. Herb. No. 
952482; 

Foxcraft, Fernald 523, September 5, 1894, U. S. Herb. No. 
952482; 

Madison, Fernald 529, August 1, 1892, U. S. Herb. No. 
952481; 

Orono, Fernald 524 September 13, 1890, U. S. Herb. No. 
952473; 

Orono, Harvey and Harvey 1270, June 1890, U. S. Herb. No. 
952511; 

St. Francis, Fernald 170, August 18, 1893, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 75630; 

St. Francis, Fernald 170, August 18, 1893, U. S. Herb. No. 
204116; 

St. Francis, Fernald 170, August 18, 1893, U. S. Herb. No. 
822926. ; 

QUEBEC: 


Montreal, Mohr, August 10, 1883, U.S. Herb. No. 722799. 
NEW HAMPSHIRE: 
Manchester, Batchelder September 25, 1910, U. S. Herb. No. 


952476; 

Peterboro, Deane and Batchelder, August 30, 1910, U. S. Herb. 
No. 952476; 

Peterboro, Deane and Batcheldr, August 30, 1910, U.S. Herb. 
No. 952477; 

Wolfsborough, Conant, September, 1881, U. S. Herb. No. 
952475. 

VERMONT: 
Burlington, Jones 1678, September 8, 1892, U. 5S. Herb. No. 
647813; 


Rutland, Kirk 1032, August 15, 1913, U.S. Herb. No. 725801; 
Rutland, Kirk 1033, August 15, 1913, U.S. Herb. No. 725802. 
MASSACHUSETTS: 
Essex County, Conant, 1879, U. S. Herb. No. 952472; 
Framingham, Smith, September, 1894, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79914; 
South Hadley, Cook, 1887, U. S. Herb. No. 277074; 


MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS 77 


Southampton, collector and date not given, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 785517. 
RHODE ISLAND: 
Limestone Rock, Greenman 2528, October 2, 1910, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 740428. 
Providence, Olney September, U. S. Herb. No. 852471. 
NEw YORK: 
Hinckley, Mabeur 3348, August 7, 1911, U. S. Herb. No. 
952469; 
Ithaca, collector not given, October 26, 1892, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 75643; | 
Ithaca, collector not given, August 25, 1893, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 75644; 
Ithaca, Rowles, September 4, 1894, U. S. Herb. No. 952468; 
Lake George, Vasey 1882, U.S. Herb. No. 952452; 
Lebanon Springs, Harrison, September 19, 1890, U. S. Herb. 
No. 952470; 
Oxford, Coville, September 11, 1885, U. S. Herb. No. 295252; 
Pennyan, collector and date not given, but probably Sartwell, 
M. B. G. Herb. No. 75606; 
Wayne County, Mankensen, October 8, 1869, U. S. Herb. No. 
822927; 
Western New York, Gray, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75643; 
Western New York, Gray, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75623; 
Western New York, Gray, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
Foe ge 
CANADA: 
Without definite locality, Shepard date not given, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 75628. 
ONTARIO: 
Birch Island, Macoun 26246, U.S. Herb. No. 952486; 
Gault, Herriott 83, September 6, 1901, U. S. Herb. No. 952490; 
Gault, Merriott, September 5, 1898, U. S. Herb. No. 952489; 
Johnstone’s Harbor, Macoun 26248, U. S. Herb. No. 952487; © 
Point Edward, Macoun 26247, U. S. Herb. No. 952485; 
Point Pelee, Dodge 19, September 17, 1911, U. S. Herb. No. 
952491, 
Rockcliffe, Macoun 86177, August 10, 1911, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 744523. 


78 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Our Flycatchers. 


BY BROTHER ALPHONSUS, C. S. C. 


Woop PEWEE. 
Mytochanes virens 

Our commonest flycatcher is the Wood Pewee. Although it is 
found in greater abundance in woods and groves, yet the bird may 
also be heard in the shade trees on the streets of our smaller cities. 
No other flycatcher has so musical a note as the Pewee. All day 
long through spring and summer its silvery song may be enjoyed 
by the bird lover. This species arrives here after the middle of 
May and remains until late in September. During this month 
the song gradually ceases. The nest of the Pewee, which is saddled 
on a limb of any kind of tree, may not be easily seen. The structure 
is small and almost looks like a protuberance on the branch where 
it is placed. But a keen and practised eye will note the nest, which 
will soon be visited by the mother bird. After the young are 
fledged they make themselves conspicious by their querulous 
disposition, often darting after one another with great pugnacity. 
In flycatching the Pewee is fearless and graceful, sometimes passing 
within a few feet of a pedestrian. The presence of this interesting 
species is one of the notable features of our lawns and parks. 

PHOEBE. 
Sayornis phoebe 

This flycatcher is common in some localities, and very rare or 
entirely absent in others. It is hard to explain this rarity or absence; 
for even when suitable nesting-places, like grottoes, are available, 
still the bird may avoid a certain territory during most of the 
spring and summer. In early spring, usually in the latter part of 
March, the first Phoebes appear, and they may be seen for several 
weeks afterward. The Phoebe is always the first of the fly catchers 
to arrive in spring and the last to leave in autumn. As already 
intimated this species builds its nest under some kind of shelter, 
like an outhouse or a bridge. Two broods are raised in the same 
nest, which is always lined with moss. The note of the Phoebe is 
less musical than the Pewee’s; the bird is also less active and graceful 
in flight. Another characteristic difference between these two 
species is found in the fact that the Phoebe moves its tail while 
the bird is perched on a wire or a branch, but the Pewee never 


OUR FLYCATCHERS 79 


indulges in this flirtation. The Phoebe is slightly larger than the 
Pewee, and not so pleasing in appearance. The large black head 
of the Phoebe mars its form much. 


CRESTED FLYCATCHER. 
Mytarchus crinitus 

This large and beautiful flycatcher is less common than is the 
Pewee or the Phoebe. The crest, yellow underparts, and chestnut- 
colored tail give the bird a striking appearance. It is mostly an 
inhabitant of the woods, and rarely nests in orchards. After the 
nesting-season the young birds and old ones move about seeking 
for food. Occasionally they may wander away from their habitat 
in the deep woods. Then their loud and rather weird-sounding 
note may be heard in some smaller grove or orchard. However, 
this species is most easily seen and heard early in May when it 
first arrives from the South, and before it enters into the deep 
woods to nest. it is partial to the tree tops, only descending when 
the lure of its prey brings it to a lower plane. On such occasions 
the bird may be seen to advantage, and its handsome appearance 

will challenge the admiration of the observer. 


ALDER FLYCATCHER. 
Empidonex trailli alnorum 

As its name indicates, this species is partial to marshy land, 
although some individuals prefer high places. I have known an 
Alder Flycatcher to nest for two seasons in a thick growth of 
mulberries at the edge of an orchard. I think, too, that such cases 
are not rare, for [ have frequently heard the notes of this flycatcher 
in thick growths along road-sides. However, to find these birds in 
abundance you must visit a piece of lowland, where their character- 
istic note is constantly uttered. 


KINGBIRD. 
Tyrannus tyrannus. 

Perhaps this flycatcher is better known than any other members 
of the family. Its habits are such as to attract more attention, while 
its large size and neat appearance also make the bird conspicuous. 
Of a general slate color, with a black head, white underparts, and 
the tail with a white band, the Kingbird is truly a handsome 
species. Usually the bird shows a preference for wires for perching 
places. Here it will dart out after insects, or make a sudden sally 
at any other passing bird. This habit of attacking birds, large or 


80 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST . é 


small, has gained for the species the name, Kingbird. According 
to some farmers the bee-martin, another of the Kingbird’s names, 
is destructive of the life of bees. ‘This is an over-statement of the 
case, however, for the number of bees taken by any Kingbird is 
comparatively small, and not sufficient to warrant shooting the 
birds. Like all of the flycatchers, the Kingbird bathes by dipping 
into the water. As it flies over the surface of a lake, the bird may 
dip several times, or it may fly from a perch, dip, and return to the 
perch again. : 
LEAST FLYCATCHER. 
Empidonax. minimus 

This species is somewhat rare in our locality, and few individuals 
are found nesting here. It is more common in spring and autumn, 
when the birds may be seen perched on-wire fences near road-sides. 
In many ways the Least Flycatcher is an under-study of the 
Phoebe. Like this species it moves its tail when at rest, and also 
choose similar places to perch. In movements, however, the Least 
Flycatcher is more active than the Phoebe. Another species 
that the Least Flycatcher closely resembles in appearance is the 
Alder Flycatcher, and even an experienced observer can hardly 
tell the two species apart, unless he hears the notes, which are 
quite distinctive. They are both about the same size, and their 
markings are indistinguishable even with field glasses. 


. 


ACADIAN FLYCATCHER. 
Empidonex virescens 
This is a bird of deep woods, where its note may be heard, but 
without usually seeing the singer. It loves the most secluded places 
in the very depths of the woods where the growth of small trees is 
thickest. Only a practised observer can readily see the bird, and 
then only as it flits to and fro flycatching. This is undoubtedly 
one of the most elusive of our birds, and few amateur bird students 
seem to find its habitat. 
YELLOW-BELLIED FLYCATCHER. 
Empidonax flaviventris 
The rarest of our flyeatchers is the yellow-billed. Usually late 
in May a few individuals are seen by the keenest observers, and 
even they occasionally miss it altogether. In autumn it passes 
more rapidly ‘south, and few records are made of this species by 
any bird students. I have never made a single record myself in 
autumn. 


At ‘. pk ai Se 


ra 


eae 


o- 
Terk 
ac 


Rad 


=< 


ess 


~~ eH: — > 
£y xy Vad = 
Ape < 

Janets 


Contributions on general and midland natural 
history will be gladly received. Tapers on’ botany 
and allied subjects, zoology, geology and_ physical 
geography, should be addressed to the editor 

Matters relating to advertisements are. to be 
taken up with the secretary of the University. 

One hundred reprints of articles averaging 
eight pages or more will be furnished free of charge 
to contributors. More than one hundred separates can 
be obtained at cost price of the extras. When articles 
consist of less than eight pages, a certain. number 
of copies of THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST in 
which the paper appeared will be supplied free, or 
the separate articles may, by arrangement with the 
editor, be kept until future papers average eight: pages, 
provided the contributions are sent in for the next 
consecutive issue for publication, Contributors of 
articles will receive a free subscription for the year 
in which their paper appears. For further or other 
information address 

THE Eviror, Notre Dame, Indiana 


URL LLL A a 


RRS ASA eA Tenn Sn onen so ononone 


ah 


PD 
SF SUS TTS TD TMT SSDS Dr DTD DT Dr oD a DDD aT 


Original Old Books. 


ENGELMANN, G.~ Cactaceae of the Mexican Boundary (1758) Survey. 
75 beautiful plates.- 78 pp. Bound separate...2. eee eee $2.50 


Write for information. 


Duplicates for Sale 


PaxTON’S MAGAZINE OF BoTANy, London, 1834-1840, 1843-1846. 
Vols. 1-7, 10-12 inclusive. 10 volumes. Numerous hand- 
eolored illustrations, exquisitely finished, beautifully bound in 
half leather, tooled in gold. Not much worn. (Vol. 7 in cloth.) 

Net, ($2350 pensvoltimes,sLotaliy. 7) en oe PALS ea ya Ore 22h $15.00 


Ginibersity of Motre Mame 


NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


College of Arts and Letters. 


Departments of Ancient Classics, 
Modern Literature, _ History, 
Political Economy, Sociology, 
Domestic Foreign 
Commerce, Journalism, Library 
Science. 


College of Science. 


Commerce, 


Departments of Chemistry, 
Physics, Biology, ~Pharmacy, 
Agriculture. 


Departments of Construction, 


Design. 


Preparatory School. 


Variant Courses. 


College of Engineering. 


Departments of Civil Engineering, 


Mechanical Engineering, 
Electrical Engineering, Chemical 


Engineering, Mining Engineering, 


Industrial Engineering, 


College of Latw. 


Colle eot Sine Arts. 


- Departments of Artistic Diawing, 
Painting, Cartooning, Instrumental 
Music, Vocal Music. 


St. Edward Ball. 


For Young Boys. 


Notre Dame is recognized by all educators, by the press and 
by the public as a college whose work is of the same grade as 
that of the most highly endowed colleges or the best state univ- 
sities. Its atmosphere is strongly Catholic and no young man who 
has ever attended the University of Notre Dame can escape its 
influence in after life. 


The discipline is paternal, and aims at giving young men the 
fullest liberty consistent with earnest study and manly Christian 
character. reasonable | rates. 
application. 


Rooms at Catalogue sent on 


Address: 
THE REGISTRAR 


NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


| 
| 
| 
| 
, 
, 
: 
| 


CS eS ee aoe Se Ses ese Sess sese5esesesesse4 


ra 
i 
o 
” 
on 
= 
é 
a 
vit 


ESTOS gE 


Z a Bei is 


a oan ae MIDLAND 
‘NATURALIST 


". Devoted to Natural History, Primarily 
that of the Prairie States 


i 


Published by the University of Notre Dame, . Sas orien Mitta 


ae 2 Notre Dame, Indiana / \ 
eS : ( LEC 13.1919. ) 
Nab J. A. NIEUWLAND, C.S.C., Ph. D., Se. D., Editor oh 
. y ‘ - we ) se 
be | CONTENTS 

Vs The Missouri Muhlenbergias—IV. Benjamin Franklin Bush 81 


Birds Observed at Notre Dame, Indiana, in the Spring of 1919 
Brother Alphonsus, C..S..C. 98 


An All-Day Bird Trip at Washington, D. C. 
Harry C. Oberholser. 103 


PRICE $1.50 A YEAR SINGLE NUMBERS 30 CENTS 
FOREIGN, 6s. 6d. 


Entered as second-class matter at Notre Dame, Indiana. Acceptance for mailing at special 
rate of postage provided for in section 1103, Act of October 3, 1917, 
authorized on July 3, 1918. 


THE UNIVERSITY PRESS, NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


Vol. ne —tr909- 1980) 5%, vs oe ohn. 


“Inclusive of Three Reprints (see toe Extra. = 
Vol. III.=(1913~1914). 383 Ppp. Unbound, exclusive of Regaine No. ree 
(See below). [Nos. I; 2, 3, 7.) are scarce aud | early out of print, 


weostiags 6 cts.eathic we ee eae Ee ee ee ee 
“Co Tnelusive of Reprint Ne. 4,.extra 204. OS are ck ee 
‘VoliIV a (191 $1016), Unbouthtx Zork SU he site ee 
Vol. V.—(191 9-197 8)vs Unbound 4.55122 ee i i Se a 
= ; He gpa Bo aloe Total—$17. ee 
Publications. aoe 
Haun, W. Analytic Study of Faunal Changes in Nada “2 plates, 
TOMO 2. FP RP sets SNE a NS dh a oe ee Aes $ 
Sharan, E. 1. Leaflets of Botanical Observation and ‘Chitiosm 
y Fe 2 vols -Complete. (PGOSH 1912) cage gs ee 
Les ae Cybele Columbiana, A series of Studies in Botany; 
- chiefly North American. No. 1. ier num- 
bers to follow)....... Faced CIR MeO) a al Sah wh le cee, Seen 
if i Pittonia, A series of Papers: Realting to Botany ACs ate 
4 Botanists, 5 vols. (1887-1905):..2.0-2-- 2-22 Meine Ms 


ie Flora Franciscana, Parts I, If, Il. [Part IV pub- 
lished long after the other parts, is quite. 
. unobtainable, as all copies not. immediately 
- » distributed seem to have been lost in the San ©. 


Francisco fire: Price as published? 2) 4 ta. vhs 
Pht cage Manual of the Botany of the Region of San Fran- 
cisco Bay (1894). Bound Clothe sang Wt at, ea 
Dinbounds bb eee sn OE rg Ne Hs ASAE ie 
(Price as published of latter)._...... iy he eu ORAL 2. 
UTTERBACK, W. I. Naiades of Missouri, 200 pp. 29 pl. and some text 
Tyres 5 OE IG ates OR Sea Geeta eye I. 
Reprints. 
RAKINESOUR;-C. Si “Neageny ton, (7825) 2 ae 2 ee ire es $ 
tf ue The Natural Family of the Carexides (1840)... 
ue pie Scadiography- or 100 Genera -of Ombelliferous 
Plastts ete: : (S40) sae SE Bi eS fad ae 1.5 


Monographie des Coquilles Bivalves et Fluvia- 
tiles de la Riviere Ohio. Remarques sur les 
Rapports Naturels des Genres Viscum, Samolus 
et Viburnum. A Bruxelles (1820)--..-...- BANG rE. 

LECOonTE, J. B: Reprints of Monographs without plates, $2.50; with 

42 photographic copies of unpublished plates 
(7x8), $25.00; with colored photographic plates...$37:50° 
LeContr, J. .  Two'extra plates reproduced from originals in NOY. 
Bot. Garden. ° Colored, $1.50; uncolored... 2... 1.0e 


-* 
& 
a 


The American Midland Naturalist 


PUBLISHED BI-MONTHLY BY THE UNIVERSITY 
OF NOTRE DAME, NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


VOR Vie NOVEMBER, tog19. NO. 6. 


The Missouri Muhlenbergias.--IV. ; 


BY BENJAMIN FRANKLIN BUSH. ~; ae 
NEw JERSEY: 
Califon, Fisher, September 7, 1897, U. S. Herb. No. 952450; 
Califon, Fisher, September 7, 1897, U. S. Herb. No. 647188; 
Califon, Fisher, September 7, 1897, U. S. Herb. No. 733809; 
Cranberry Lake, Mackenzie 2434, September 16, 1906; 
Sussex County, Mackenzie 2434, September 16, 1906, M. B. 
G. Herb. No. 75667. 


PENNSYLVANIA: 
Dillerville, Porter, September 16, 1859, U. S. Herb. No. 
952451, 


Lancaster, Small, September 24, 1889, U. S. Herb. No. 746186. 
MARYLAND: 
Garrett County, Donnell-Smith, September 26, 1879, U. S. 
Herb. No, 822931; 
Garrett County, Donnell-Smith, September 26, 1879, U. S. 
Herb. No. 822932. 
VIRGINIA: 
Luray, Steele and Steele 125, U. S. Herb. No> 418475; 
Turay, Steele and Steele 125, M. B. G. Herb. No. 75586. 
INDIANA: 
Lafayette, Dorner 68, September 7, 1902, U. S. Herb. No. 


952461; 

Miller’s, Chase 662, September 21, 1897, U. S. Herb. No. 
746119; 

Miller’s, Umbach 5119, October 2, 1909, U. S. Herb. No. 
952458; 


Pine, Umbach 5073, September 18, 1909, U. S. Herb. No. 
952459; 


THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Pine, Umbach, September 13, 1897, U.S. Herb. No. 351222; 
Tolleston, Chase 334, September 23, 1898, U. S. Herb. No. 
746120; 
Tolleston, Chase 334, September 23, 1898, U. Ill. Herb.; 
Tolleston, Chase 334, September 23, 1898, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 75590; 
Wells County, Deam, September 15, 1901, U. S. Herb. No. 
952460. 
KENTUCKY: 
Without definite locality, Short, 1840, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75649. 
ILLINOIS: 
Algonquin, Nason, August 27, 1879, U.S. A. Herb.; 
Apple River, Pepoon 611,, August 18, 1908, U. Ill. Herb.; 
Athens, Hall 1888, U.S. Herb. No. 952505; 
Champaign County, Burrill, October, 1871, U. Ill. Herb.; 
Joliet, Skeels 553, September 28, 1904, U.S. Herb. No. 952462; 
Joliet, Skeels 553, September 28, 1904, U.S. Herb. No. 746122; 
Joliet, Skeels 553, September 28, 1904, U.S. Herb. No. 646206; 
Lewistown, Pepoon, August 1890, M. B. G. Herb. No. 767489; 
Oregon, Wazte, August 17, 1885, U.S. Herb. No. 490959; 
Rockford, Bebb, date not given, U.S. Herb. No. 952453; 
Without definite locality, Ball, date not given, U. S. Herb. 
No. 682507; 
Without definite locality, Gandoger, 1904, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
713648; 
Without definite locality, Wolf, 1880, U. S. Herb. No. 952457; 
Without definite locality, Wolf, 1881, U. S. Herb. No. 952455; 
Without definite locality, Iol/, date not given, U.S. Herb. No. 
952456. 
NORTH CAROLINA: 
Buncombe County, Bilimore Herbarium 657a, U. S. Herb. No. 
Bo007 0% 
MICHIGAN: 
Cassville, Dodge, September 9, 1910, U. S. Herb. No. 952467; 
Grindstone City, Dodge, September 1, 1912, U. 5. Herb.. No. 
730523; | | 
Imlay City, Palmer, September, 1880, U. S. Herb. No. 952465; 
Port Austin, Ball, September 20, 1902, U. S. Herb. No. 
952466. 


MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS 83 


Iowa: 
Ames, Gall 115, August 5, 1896, M. B. C. Herb. No. 75618; 
Ames, Pammel 114, August 8, 1896, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75617; 
Clinton, ene! 251, September 4, 1896, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75619; 
Iowa City, Hitchcock, 1888, M. B. G. Herb. No. 75585; 
Muscatine County, Pammel and Keppert, 1861, September 
10, 1898, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79770; 
Sheldahl, Pammel, Hume and Sample 1422, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 75992; 
Sheldahl, Pammel, Hume and Sample 1422, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 75594: 
WISCONSIN: 
Left Foot Lake, Schuette, August 31, 1883, U. 5. Herb. No. 
751731; 
Milwaukee, Chase 1948, August 11, 1902, U. S. Herb. No. 
746118; 
Williams Bay, Umbach 4696, September 2, 1909, U. S. Herb. 
No. 952460; 
Williams Bay, Umbach 4721, September 3, 1909, U. S. Herb. 
No. 952463. 
MINNESOTA: 
Battle Lake, Sheldon, August, 1892, U. S. Herb. No. 952444; 
Fergus Falls, Sheldon, August, 1892, U. S. Herb No. 952445; 
Fort Snelling, Mearns 794, September 13, 1891, U. S. Herb. 
No. 952443; 
Groveland, Oswald, 1911, U. S. Herb. No. 730775. 
KANSAS: 
Kingman County, Carleton 549, September 30, 1891, U. S. 
Herb. No. 952442; 
Riley County, Norton 597, August 18, 1895, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75615. 
NEBRASKA: 
Big Sandy Creck, Clements 2848, August 9, 1893, U. S. Herb. 
No. 221806; 
Central Nébtasha: Rydberg 1686, August 12, 1893, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 75636; 
Natteck, Rydberg 1756, Be cet iE, £o03, U1 o. Herb. vino; 
208268; 


84 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


) les 


Natteck, Rydberg 1764, September 13, 1893, U. S. Herb. No. 
208267; 
South Fork of Dismal River, Rydberg 1686, August 12, 1893, 
U.S. Herb. No. 208269; 
Talmage, Elmore 92, August 6, 1896, U. S. Herb. No. 952441; 
Thedford, Rydberg 1704, August 19, 1893, U. S. Herb. No. 
208266. 
SouTtH DakoTa: 
Bear Creek, Over 2335, September 1, 1913, U. S. Herb. No. 
693343; . 
Mill City, Griffiths 723, August 27, 1897, U. S. Herb. No. 
952448; 
Huron, Griffiths 6, August 25, 1896, U. S. Herb. No. 952449. 
NorTH DAKOTA: 
Devil’s Lake, Hitchcock 5061, U. 8S. Herb. No. 952447; 
Devil’s River, Hitchcock 5061, U. Ill. Herb. 
MANITOBA: 
Elm Park, Macoun 13213, August 11, 1896, U. S. Herb. No. 
952488. 
MISSISSIPPI: 
Starkville, Tracy June 21, 1892, U. S. Herb. No. 952495. 
NEw MExIco: 
Socono County, Metcalfe 359, August 3, 1903, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 75637; 
Socono County, Metcalfe 359, August 3, 1903, U. S. Herb. No. 
952494, 
Socono County, Metcalfe 359, August 3, 1903, U. S. Herb. 
No. 495426; . 
Without definite locality, Fendler 764, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79687. 
COLORADO: 
Denver, Ward, August 19, 1891, U. S. Herb. No. : ae 
WYOMING: 
Tower, Griffiths 521, August 12, 1897, U. S. Herb. No. 952493. 
ARIZONA: 
Wilgus Creek, Blumer 1784, October 12, 1907, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 75660; 
Wilgus Creek, Blumer, October 20, 1907, U. S. Herb. No. 
952491. 
MUHLENBERGIA TORREYI (Kunth) Hitchcock, ined. 


= 


PBs ye Sy ay Ra ee ae ene = 23 


MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS 85 


Agrostis diffusa Muhl. Gram. 64. 1817, not Agrostis diffusa 
Host. 1809. 

Agrostis sylvatica Torr. Fl. U. S. 1: 87. 1824, not Agrostis 
sylvatica L. 1763. 

Agrostis Torreyi Kunth. Enum. Pl. I: 226. 1838, replacing 
Agrostis sylvatica Torrey. 

Muhlenbergia sylvatica (Torr.) Torr. Cat. Pl. N. Y. State, 
188. 1840. 

Muhlenbergia sylvatica gracilis Scribner, grans. scans. Acad. Sci. 
9g: 116. 1885, not N. gracilis Kanth, 1829. 

Muhlenbergia umbrosa Scribner, Rhodora 9g: 20. 1907. 

Muhlenbergia umbrosa attenuata Scribner, Rhodora g: 21. 
1907. 

Muhlenbergia sylvatica T & G., Bush in Flora of Jackson 
County, Missouri, No. 861, 1885; Tracy in Flora of Missouri 
No. 1646, 1886; Eggert in Catalogue of Plants of Saint 
Louis, Missouri, 1891; Mackenzie and Bush in Manual 
of the Flora of Jackson County, Missouri, No. 7, 1902; 
Daniels in Flora of Columbia, Missouri, No. 73, 1907. 

Muhlenbergia sylvatica Torr., Palmer in Catalogue of Plants 
of Jasper County, Missouri, Nos. 218 and 3187. 1916. 

Me. to Dak. and southward to Missouri and Kansas, according 


to Scribner, l. c. 


N. B. to Ont. Ia. and southward, Hitchcock in Manual. 

N. B. to Ont. Minn. N. Car. Tenn. Nebr. and the Ind. Terr., 
Nash in Flora. 

Maine to Minnesota, south to Arizona, Virginia and Texas. 


SPECIMENS EXAMINED: 
MAINE: 


Dover, Fernald 528, September 3, 1894, U. S. Herb. No. 
952428; 

Moscow, Chamberlain, August 29, 1902, U. S. Herb. No. 
491269; 

Orono, Knight, September 17, 1905; 

St. Francis, Fernald 171, August 15, 1893, MFR. G. Herb. 
No. 79617. 


MASSACHUSETTS: 


Essex County, Conant, August ,1880, U. S. Herb. No. 952429; 
Essex County, Conant, 1880, U. S. Herb. No. 952430; 
South Hadley, Cook 1887, U.S. Herb. No. 277075; 


S86 THE AMERICAN MIDIAND NATURALIST 


Without definite locality, Chapman, date not given, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 785595. 
CONNECTICUT: 
Windsor, Bissell, September 16, 1906, U. S. Herb. No. 952431. 
NEw YorRK: 
Bergen, collector not given, August, 1887, U. Ill. Herb.; 
Ithaca, collector not given, August 25, 1893, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79737; 
Lake George, Vasey, 1882, U. S. Herb. No. 952432; 
Lake George, Vasey, 1882, U. S. Herb. N95. 952433; 
North Hannibal, Pearce, September 13, 1883, U. S. Herb. No. 
152900; 
Pennyan, Sartwell, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79625, 
Wayne County, Mackenzen, estas 16, 1870, U. S. Hero 
No. 822959. 
NEw JERSEY: 
Hoboken, collector and date not given, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79654; 
Hoboken, collector and date not given, M. B. G. Herb. Na 
79626; 
Stockholm, Van Sickle, August 1, 1895, U. S. Herb. No. 
244234. 
PENNSYLVANIA: 
Germantown, Digyn, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79584; 
Philadelphia, Smith 85, date not given, U.S. Herb. No. 552434; 
Quakertown, Moyer, August, 1877, U.S. A: Herb. ; 
Without definite locality, McMinn, date not given, U. 5S. 
Herb. No. 952435. 
MARYLAND: 
Bradley Heights, Chase 6859, U. Ill Herb. 
OHIO: 
Milan, Moseley, August 27, 1894, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79588. 
VIRGINIA: 
Sweet Springs, Steele 298, September 12, 1903, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79743. 
WEST VIRGINIA: 
Goose Creek, Donnell-Smith, September 12, 1879, U. S. Herb. 
No. 822961; 


eT 


MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS 


87 


Goose Creek, Donnell-Smith, September 12, 1879, U. S. Herb. 


No. 822961; 


Sweet Springs, Steele and Steele, 298, September 12, 1903, 


U. S$. Herb. No. 490276. 


‘TENNESSEE: 


Cocke Councy, Kearney, September 1, 1897, U. S. Herb. 
952427; 

Knoxville, Ruth 3, date not given, U.S. Herb. No. 952426; 

Suwanee, Eggert, September 10, 1898, M. B. G. Herb. 
79721; 

Suwanee, Eggert, September 10, 1898, M. B. G. Herb. 
79734- 


LINOIS: 


Athens, Hall, September, 1874, U. S. Herb. No. 952436; 
Beardstown, Geyer, 1842, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79661; 


Blufis Lake, Eggert, September 24, 1875, M. B. G. Herb, 


197333 


’ Edgemont, Craig, October 23, 1910, M. B., G. Herb. 


82663; 

Menard County, Hall, date not given, U. Ill. Herb.; 

Mount Carroll, Shimek, October, 1891, U. S. Herb. 
952438; © 

Oquawka, Patterson, September, 1898, M. B. G. Herb. 
75662; 

Peoria, Brendel, date not given, U. Ill. Herb.; 

Peoria, Brendel, date not given, U. Ill. Herb.; 

Peoria, Brendel, date not given, U. Ill. Herb.; 


Princeville, Chase 941, October 14, 1900, M. B. G. Herb. 


79747; 

Princeville, Chase 941, October 14, 1900, U. S. Herb. 
746215; 

Taylorville, Andrews, August 24, 1898, U. Ill. Herb.; 

Taylorville, Andrews, August 26, 1898, U. Ill. Herb.; 

Taylorville, Andrews, August 27, 1898, U. Ill. Herb.; 

Taylorville, Andrews, August 28, 1898, U. Ill. Herb.; 


No. 


No. 


No. 


No. 


No. 


No. 


No. 


No. 


Taylorville, Andrews, September 10, 1898, U. Ill. Herb.; 
Taylorville, Andrews, September 12, 1898, U. Ill. Herb.; 


Urbana, Gibbs, September, 1898, U. Ill. Herb.; 


Wabash County, Schneck, September 4, 1900, U. Ill. Herb.; 


88 


2 i 


THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Without definite locality, Andrews, date not given, U. IIl. 
Herb.; 

Without definite locality, Engelmann, date not given, M. B. 
G. Herb. No. 79660, in part the plant marked 3 on this sheet, 
but as there are 3 distinct species on this sheet, and 3 labels, 
it is impossible ‘to tell which plants the labels belong to; 

Without definite locality, Wolf 318, date not given, U. II. 
Herb.; 


Without definite locality, Wolf 1882, U. S. Herb. No. 952437. 


MISSOURI: 


Aberdeen, Davis, September 24, 1911, U.S. Herb. No. 673648; 

Allenton, Letterman, August, 1876, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
772799; 

Allenton, Letterman, September, 1892, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
‘772902. 
Bagnell, Trelease, September 22, 1897, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79742; . 
Carthage, Palmer 218, September 7, 1902, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
756905; 

Cliff Cave, Norton, August 26, 1899, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
82694; 

Columbia, Tracy, August 11, 1884, M. B. G. Herb. No: 
79736; 

Creve Coeur Lake, Kellogg 26, September 25, 1901, U. 5. Herb. 
No. 950192; 

Creve Coeur Lake, Kellogg 27, September 25, 1901, U. S. 
Herb. No. 750194; 

Creve Coeur Lake, Kellogg, September 25, 1901, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 79799; 

Dodson, Mackenzie, September 26, 1896; 

Gates, Standley, 9382, August 26, 1912, U. S. Herb. No. 
688298, in part, the plant marked B on this sheet; 

Ironton, Russell, August, 1897, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79723; 

Jackson County, Bush, September 27, 1893, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 80039; 

Jefferson Barracks, Eggert, September 4, 1877, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 767490; 

Jefferson Barracks, Eggert, September 4, 1877, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 79730; 


MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS 89 


Jefferson Barracks, Eggert, September 4, 1877, M. B. G. Herb. 


No. 739938; 

Jefferson Barracks, Eggert, September 4, 1877, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79731; 

Jefferson Barracks, Eggert, September 4, 1877, M. B. G. Herb 
No. 739938; 

Jcevson Barracks, Eggert, September 4, 1877, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79839; 

Jefierson Barracks, Eggert, September 4, 1877, N. D. Herb. 
No. 8388; 

Monteer, Bush 4887, October 10, 1907, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79832; 


Monteer, Bush,4887, October 10, 1907; 
Sarcoxie, Palmer 3187, September 18, 1910, M. B. G. Herb. 


No. 757392; . 

Sarcoxie, Palmer 3187, September 18, 1910, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79804; 

Sibley, Bush 4822, August 21, 1907, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79829; 


Sibley, Bush 4822, August 21, 1907, U. S. Herb. No. 590886; 
Sibley, Mackenzie 548, October 2, 1901; 
Springfield, Standley 8546, August 3% ro1t,. U.-S.. Heth, Na: 
687497; 
St. Louis, Eggert 226, August 3, 4877, U. S. Herb. No. 950193; 
Swan, Bush 603, September 28, 1899, U. S. Herb. No. 362266; 
Swope Park, Mackenzie 427, September 13, 1901; 
Terre Bleue Creek, Trelease, August 30, 1898, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79745. 
MICHIGAN: 
Lapeer, Dodge 18, August 17, 1911, U. S. Herb. No. 952439. 
Iowa: 
Ames, Bessey October 18, 1872, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79748; 


Clinton, Pammel 250, September 4, 1896, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79616; 

Clinton, Pammel 250, September 4, 1896, U. S. Herb. No. 
294631; 

Dakota City, Pammel 111, August 8, 1896, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79727; 

Dakota City, Pammeli111, June 29, 1886, U. S. Herb. No. 


952440; 


go 


THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


“Fayette County, Fink 461, August, 1894, U. S. Herb. No. 
230547- 
MINNESOTA: 
St. Anthony Park, Oswald, 1911, U. S. Herb. No. 730777. 
KANSAS: 
Manhattan, Hitchcock, October 21, 1892, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79614; 
Manhattan, Kellerman, 1888, U. S. Herb. No. 228628; 
McFarland, Hitchcock 7832, October 17, 1910, U. S. Herb. No. 
952401; 
Riley County, Norton 598, September 28, 1895, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79614; 
Riley County, Norton 598, September 28, 1895, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 353374- 
NEBRASKA: 
Red Cloud, Bates, September 13, 1906, U.S. Herb. No. 559653. 
ARKANSAS: 
Benton County, Plank 60, date not given, U. S. Herb. No. 
952425; 
Benton County, Plank, Summer, 1900, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
82686; 
Benton County, Plank, Summer, 1900, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
82687: 
Benton County, Plank, Summer, 1900, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
82678. 
TEXAS: 
Dallas County, Reverchon 1050, September, 1873, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 80080; 
Without definite locality, Nealley 403, 1889, U. 5. Herb. No. 
‘952424, labeled M. umbrosa by Scribner; 
Without definite locality, Nealley, 1890, U. S. Herb. No. 
952414; 
Without definite locality, Reverchon, date not given, M. B. 
G. Herb. No. 80114; 
Without definite locality, Reverchon, date not given, M. B. 
G. Herb. No. 80115; 
Without definite locality, Reverchon, date not given, M. B. 
G. Herb. No. 80116; 
Without definite locality, Reverchon 31, 1885, U. S. Herb. No. 


MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS Apes 


952423, labeled M. sylvatica var.—and M. Willdenovit by 
Scribner; 
Without definite locality, Reverchon 71, U. S. Herb. No. 
4 952413, labeled M. sylvatica and M. sobolifera by Scribner, 
q and M. Mexicana by Hitchcock. 


ARIZONA: 
Grapevine Cafion, 7oumey 168, July 30, 1891, U. S. Herb. No. 
952422, 5 
Without definite locality, McDougal, 1891, U. S. Herb. No. 
952421. 


12. MUHLENBERGIA POLYSTACHYA Mackenzie and Bush, Manual 
of the Flora of Jackson County, Missouri, 23, 1902. 
Muhlenbergia Mexicana Scribner, |. c., in part, not M. Mexicana 
Trin, 1824. 
Muhlenbergia Mexicana Hitchcock in Manual in part, not 
M. Mexicana Trin. 1824. 

Not mentioned by Nash in the Illustrated Flora. Missouri and 
Illinois to Wisconsin. 
This species has been neglected or misunderstood since it was 
first described, and in order that my readers may see how very 
different it is from M. Mexicana, to which it has been referred by 
two agrostologists, I herewith present the original description; 


M. potystacHya Mackenzie & Bush, n. sp. 2 feet high, erect, 
much branched; leaves 1 1-2 inches to 2 1-2 inches long, 1 line to” 
2 lines wide; panicles on peduncles 1 inch to 5 inches long, long- 
exserted, densely flowered, the lower branches separated; flowers 
nearly sessile, 1 line long; the glames as in the last (IZ. Mexicana); 
hairs at base of flowering glume copious, 1-3 to 1-2 length of glume. 
Open rocky woods east of Sibley. August-October. 


SPECIMENS EXAMINED: 

Missouri: 
Sibley, Bush, October 14, 1901; 
Sibley, Bush 4171, October 10, 1906, U. S. Herb. No. 950396, 

with lemmas awned; 

Sibley, Mackenzie 637, October 14, 1901, TYPE. 

ILLINOIS: 
Fulton County, Wolf, date not given, U. S. Herb. No. 952504; 
Urbana, collector not given, 1876, U. Ill. Herb.; 
Wady Petra, Chase 1268, September 23, 1906, U. S. A. Herb.; 


92° THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


\ Wady Petra, Chase 1268, September 23, 1906, U. S. Herb. No. 
952454. 
WISCONSIN: 

Ashland, Hitchcock 5095, September 27, U. S. Herb. No. 
952500; 

Without definite locality, Wood, 1887, U. S. Herb. No. 952501; 

Without definite locality, Wood, 1887, U.S. Herb. No. 952502. 

13. MUHLENBERGIA CUSPIDATA (Torr.) Rydberg, Bull. Torr. 
Club, 32: 599. 1905. 

Vilfa cuspidata+Torr.; Hook. Fl. Bov. Am. 2: 238. 1840. 

Sporobolus cuspidatus (Torr.) Wood, Bot. & Fl. 385. 1870. ~» 

Sporobolus brevifolius Scribner, Mem. Torr. Club. 5: 39, 1894, 
in small part, not Agrostis brevifolia Nuttall 1818, nor Muh- 
lenbergia brevifolia (Nutt.) Nash. 

Sporobolus cuspidatus (Torr.) Wood, Mackenzie and Bush in 
Manual of the Floraof Jackson County, Missouri, No. 4. 1902; 
Daniels in Flora of Columbia, Missouri, No. 81, 1907, but 
very doubtiul, as this species is not known to get as far east 
in Missouri. Dr. Daniels has omitted several very common 
species of Sporobolus from his Flora, and I suspect that 
one of these has been mistaken for M. cuspidata. 

Wisc. to Mo. and southward, Hitchcock in Manual. 

Mani. to the N. W. Terr. south to Mo. and Kans., Nash in Flora. 

Mani. to Alberta, south to Mo. and Kans., Nash in Illustrated 
Flora. 

Manitoba to Wisconsin, Northern Illinois, Missouri and Colorado. 
SPECIMENS EXAMINED: 
ALBERTA: 
Calgary, .Hitchcock 4977, September 19-22, 1909, U. Ii. 
Herb. 
NortTH DAKOTA: 
Leeds, Lunell, August 20, 1906, U. Ill. Herb. 
WISCONSIN: 

St. Peter’s River, Thurber, date not given, U. Ill. Herb. No. 
79663. 

Iowa: 

Ames, Hitchcock, date not given M. B. G. Herb. No. 79630. 

ILLINOIS: 
Joliet, Hill 185, September 6, 1906, U. Ill. Herb.; 
Joliet, Hill 185, October 9, 1906, U. Tl. Herb.; 


bo 


MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS 93 


Will County, Hill, August 16, 1912, U. S. Herb. No. 950191, 
all these Illinois collections a notable eastern extension of 
the range of this species. 

MIssourli: 

Atchison County, Bush 4233, August 5, 1893, U. S. Herb. No. 
950190; 

Cockrell, Bush 6479, September 23, 1911, U. S. Herb. No. 
673563; 

Greenwood, Bush 4125, September 19, 1906, U. S. Herb. No. 
590408 ; 

Jackson County, Bush 1879, August 24, 1891, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 80043; 

Watson, Bush 783, October 1, 1895, U. Ill. Herb. 

KANSAS: 

Decatur County, collector and date not given, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79631; 

Riley County, Norton 595, July 26, 1895, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79635. 

COLORADO: 
Fort Collins, Ball, August 8, 1898, M. B. G. Herb. No. 82684. 


NEw MEXxIco: 
“Cross L”’ Ranch, Griffiths 5461, August 21-24, 1903, M. B. 
G. Herb. No. 79813; 
“Cross L’’ Ranch, Griffiths 5518, August 21-24, 1903, M. B. 
G. Herb.: No. 79814; 
Raton Mountains, Griffitis 5461, August 18-19, 1903, M. 
B. G. Herb. No. 79815. 
PODOSEMUM Desvaux, nouv. Bull. Soc. Philom. 2. 189. 1810. 
Muhlenbergia in large part of American Authors, not olf 
Schreber,. 1791- 
A large genus of 40 species or more, natives of America, com- 


prising those species with more or less open, large panicles, the 
branches of which are either drooping or spreading, pedicals slendcr 
or capillary, lemmas long-awned, or occasionally shori-awned or 
awnless.’ A single species occurs in our territory. 


*The center of abundance of PoDOSEMUM species seems to be in Western 


Texas, to which region P. capillare does not appear to extend, it being the 
center of a group of three species belonging to the South Atlantic r gion. 
In a subsequent paper I shall discuss some of the many allies of P. capillare. 


94 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


1. PODOSEMUM CAPILLARE (Lamarck) Desv. Nouv. Bull. Soe. 
Philom. 2: 188. 1810. 

Stipa capillaris Lam. Tabl. Eneyel. 1: 158. 1791. 

Muhlenbergia capillaris (Lam.) Trin. Gram. Unifl. 191. 1824. 

Muhlenbergia filipes Chapman, FI. S. U. S. 603, 1897, in a 

not M. FiLIpES M. A. Curtis, 1843. 

Muhlenbergia capillaris Kunth, Tracy in Flora of Miscou 
No. 1640, as from Boone County, Missouri, collected by Galloway, 
but not given by Daniels in his Flora: of Columbia, Missouri, 
1907, and no specimens known from north of the Missouri River. 

Muhlenbergia capillaris (lam.) Trin., Palmer in Catalogue 

Plants of Jasper County, Missouri, No. 2828, 1916. 

Central Texas to Fla. and Va., according to Dewey in Manual 
of the Plants of Western Texas. 

Mass. to Fla. west to Mo. and Texas, Hitchcock in Manual. 

Mass. N. J. and Mo. to Fla. the Ind. Terr. and Texas, Nash in 
Flora. 

Mass. to Kans. Fla. and Texas, Nash in Illustrated Flora. 

New Jersey southward along the coast to Florida, west to Texas, 
aud in the interior to Tennessee, Kentucky, Illinois, Southern 
Missouri and Oklahoma, therefore being largely a coast species; 
no specimens have been seen from east of New Jersey or west of 
Eastern ‘Texas. 

SPECIMENS EXAMINED: 

NEw JERSEY: 

Atlantic County, C. A. Gross, Septemberx 3, 1897; 

Millburn, Mackenzie 580, September 20, 1903; 

Sussex County, Mackenzie 1121, September 25, 1904. 

MARYLAND: 

Glen Echo, Steele, September 25, 1904, U.S. A. Herb.; 

Great Falls of the Potomac, Ball 72, September 4, 1899, M. 

B.G) Herb. No;'79795- 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: 

Great Falls of the Potomac, Holm, October 13, 1898, M. B. 

G. Herb. No. 779209; 
Washington, Ward, September, 1875, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
75887. 

VIRGINIA: 

Bedford County, Curtiss, September, M. B. G. Herb. No, 

772781; 


MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS 95 


Bedford County, Curtiss, September 1-20, 1873, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 79774. 


NorRTH CAROLINA: 


Biltmore, Biltmore Herbarium 656a, September 13, 1898, 
M. B. G. Herb. No. 79795; 

Without definite locality, Curtis, date not given, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 79651; 

Without definite locality, Curtis, date not given, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 80007. 


GEORGIA: 
Leslie, Harper 1723, October 8, 1902, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79786. 
ALABAMA: 
Mobile, Mohr, September, 1893, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79782. 
FLORIDA: 
Duval County, Curtiss 3401, September, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79775; 
Gainesville, Chase 4269, September 30 to October 3, 1901, 
U.S. A. Herb.; 
Jacksonvilfe, Curtiss 3401, September, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
80002; 
Jacksonville, Curtiss 4049, October 6, 1893, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 767219; 
Jacksonville, Curtiss 4050, October 16, 1893, M.,B. G. Herb. 
No. 767200; 
Lake City, Buitting 785, September 8, 1892, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79796; 
Lee County, Gandoger, September, 1900, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
713891; 
Sanibel, Hitchcock 466, July, August, 1900, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79789; 


Without definite locality, collector and date not given, M. B. 
G. Herb. No. 79995; 


MISSISSIPPI: 


Biloxi, Earle, October 8, 1897, U. Ill. Herb.; 
Biloxi, Earle, October 8, 1897, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79795; 
Biloxi, Tracy 4637, October 4, 1898,.M. B. G. Herb. No. 


79794- 


96 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


LOUISIANA: 


Red River, Hale, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. No. 79601; 
Without definite locality, Hale, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79699. 
‘TENNESSEE: 
Knoxville, Ruth, September, 1892, M. B. G. Herb. No. 773048; 
Knoxville, Ruth October 6, 1894, M. B. G. Herb. No. 80093; 
Knoxville, Ruth, October 6, 1894, U. Ill. Herb.; 
Knoxville, Ruth, October, 1895, M. B.'G. Herb. No. 79780; 
Knoxville, Ruth, October, 1897; 
Knoxville, Ruth 58, September, 1898, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79785; 
Knoxville, Ruth, October, 1900; 
Sharp Gap, Ruth, September, 1890, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
773009. 
KENTUCKY: 


Without definite locality, collector and date not given, M. 
B. G. Herb. No. 79592. 


ILLINOIS: 
Union County, Seymour, 1881, U. Ill. Herb. 


MISSOURI: 


Eagle Rock, bush 378, September 18, 1896, M. ‘B. G. Herb. 
No. 80051; 

Eagle Rock, Bush 378, September 18, 1896, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 80118; 

Eagle Rock, Bush 378, September 18, 1896, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 294602; 

Eagle Rock, Mackenzie, September 18, 1896; 

Joplin, Palmer 2828, October 11, 1909, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
756897; 

Joplin, Palmer 2828, October 11, 1909, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
756898 ; 

McDonald County, Bush, September 1, 1893, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 756898; 

Monteer, Bush 5123, September 10, 1908, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
756898 ; 

Monteer, Bush 5123, September 10, 1908, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
80057; 


MISSOURI MUHLENBERGIAS 97 


’ Monteer, ‘Bush 5123, September 10, 1908, M. B. G. Herb. 
3 No. 606505; 


Swan, Bush 642, September 29, 1899, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
: 79770; 
OKLAHOMA: 
Fonts, Blankenship August 28, 1895, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79784; 
Sapulpa, Bush 767, September 20, 1894, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
r 80003. 
TEXAS: 
Bowie County, Eggert August 27, 1898, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79781; 
College Station, Nealley, date not given, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79890; f 
; Columbia, Bush 1546, October 17, 1900, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
79788; 


Corsicana, Reverchon 3540, September 27, 1902, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 79888; 

Corsicana, Reverchon 3540, September 27, 1902, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 79777; 

Corsicana, Reverchon 3540, September 27, 1902, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 79783; 

Corsicana, Reverchon 3540, September 27, 1902; 

Grand Saline, Reverchon 2253, October .18, 1900, M. B. G. 
Herb. No 79790; 

Grand Saline, Reverchon 2253,, October 18, 1900, M. B. G. 
Herb. No. 79779; 

Grand Saline, Reverchon 2253, October 18, 1900, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 80070; 

Polytechnic, Ruth 268, October 2, 1911, M. B. G. Herb. No. 
7IOIOI; 

Sheldon, Reverchon 4109, September 6, 1903, M. B. G. Herb. 
No. 79778; 

Sheldon, Reverchon 4109, September 6, 1903, M. B. G. Herb. 
No 79889; 

Without definite locality, Drummond 344, date not given, 
M. B. G: Herb. No. 79994. 


THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


98 


‘SOK dy gi Aepy “Li Avy 


I It Av} 
Ajiensot Sisaye SOx. WOOD bI oe ZI Avy I 6 ABI 
SpooM ssueap Ul punoy sxx BLY I gz ARTY 
SIx dey of Ae ‘Se Avy I bz Av 
sax ‘“WIOD S$ -idy Pesta. <1 € -idy 

JO}UIM SEL poUleUel Moy] VW ON “Woo 12 -ady 
sox ‘“wod Of Iey «(6e “ARTY I Gz ‘IBN 
sox ‘wor tz Avy ze AvW I Li Avy 
sox ‘“wWOoD 1€ Ae Of ALI I gz AvjT 
SoA IBY 6z Ae Le Avy I gz ALY 

yueIsIM eJON saxR “WIOD 

@N oeey zi -idy 
sax “wtod Cz Ie Ve “Ie I 61 ‘1e WW 

Sulids sty} p1ooay ON ; 

uuIn}ne ul woUmMo0D ON oey 61 Ady 
eo SOK “ULOS) 6z Ae ve Avy ¢ zz AVN 
Souk SULOn) OI Ae ¢ ACI Zz b ARN 

Weis © JON sexA “WOOD 
é dey I ¢ osunf 
sax “wos ZI AVI 6 AeWw LI b Avy 
sxx ‘WOd C1 “ey e IRIN z gz ‘qay 
sax “uwloD fe Ie Oc ‘Ie z tI “Ieyy 
soz “wWod Cr -iepy fr sey I OI ‘Ie 
JawWmINsS ul uowmm0D) ON 248 I b Avy 
iu01}e4s 4aaBd 10 juses juowui0d {uses juaas 
SHNUVAaUY aMod aeau uoUTWIOD qsRl| awooeq qyxou 4L aaam AUB 


peaiqjiseeq asy qLSseM ua M 3l pip ueuM SBM UsyM Moy INOGy 


"9 °S ‘Dd ‘SASNOHd’IV YWAHLOUT AA 


“6IGI Jo sulidg ay] ul ‘euipuy ‘aureg OAJON JB Paarasq() spalg 


ysBa’T ‘Tayo COATT 
pstsstIn ‘IsyoVeVoOAPT 
uvIpeoy ‘ayo WIA 
Taply ‘1ayo LOA T 
ION 

ajding ‘youry 
Sumo ‘QAO 
PPSStoz[ORk 
P2TT-MOTJaA “OoyoND 
PILG-AII_{ ‘ooyonD 
MOID 

uMmMOotg ‘teadaaIDg 
Parga) 

}007) 

dPRIIYD 

Pagzepe) 

p3rqye,) 

[eulpies) 

sy YyMGqog 

[ROG Og 

PAGonTA 
pesulM-poy ‘psiIqyor[_, 
MOID ‘pliqyorlg 
uto}ug 


duld dO ANVN 


99 


SUOSBIS BIOS SpodIg ON vey vekepy beep eZee. 1 Oz ‘Ie aqo0ud 
sox ‘“woD gl Avy SI Avy I FI Avy poom ‘99MIg 
Avy, pure [iidy Ul spr0oe1 ON é vey I IZ ‘IB YOI9ING [MOC 
ON ey 92 AL bi Ae I Q ALI piqusao: 
ON 21eyY I Lz Ae AvidsoQ, 
sax “Wod C1 ACW ZI ABI I OI Avi preYyIO ‘IOC 
sox “Wod 6 AVI S ABI ¢ b Av d1oWIyeg ‘IOC: 
2 Sulids sq} pioovl ON poyseaiq-psy ‘yoyeqINnN 
= C1 ounf{ poivoddeay ON ‘wodg of ‘idy poeysvaiq-ayy MM ‘qoveyINN 
A oN ley to Ke MeyIy SIN 
a sax ‘“wod Il ‘sweyy =v sey) I ‘Ie yIe[MopRosy[ 
a SOUS ZUIJSoU 9,qQe]INS ON ON o1ey gding ‘uljieyy 
le) Sulids siy} p10001 ON uo0o’y 
5 4 uMOIO-AQqnyY UeYyy ON ‘“Wwopg 61 Avy oz ‘idy g ‘idy I 9 ‘idy psuMOIO-Aqny ‘Ja[suryy 
¥ jJUvpUNnQe 3IOW SI UMOIO-Uap[os ONE -On0G) — 1 isady: g idy bv -idy I tidy  pdsuMoro-Wapjor ‘Jo sul 
a A]alel spovig dIeY 6c ‘Iep «—QI “IVY I Q “Ie JIYSYysuryy 
a : sax ‘whos vz Av gi Ae Zz ¢ ACN parqsury 
4 sax “wWod 61 ‘IeyT ZI “Ie Tie ec Gouy sap [IM 
on yueisiMa PION Sax ‘“WOD antg ‘Aef 
a sox ‘“wWod gI Avy SI ABI I II Avy pig ostpuy 
n JOWMIUINS UI IIOYT ON o1ey gz AVN I Li Avy udsdtD a}WY] ‘Wor 
Si Sulids sty} pios91 ON ON sey an[_ }eoslIy ‘uo19H 
a SpOOM 3UTAT}NO UI Spos1g ON 2ey gz Avy «Vz AVI I £ ACTIN petap[noys-poy “YMeLyP 
omit} Aue }e AjoIeI uV2BS ON ey Sully ‘Ns 
ON dey Sz Aepy OI Avy SI Avy I £€ AVN polsvaiq-asoy ‘yeVaqsoryy 
ON Cc -1eW “F IVT Bepeued ‘aIsoory 
Jo}UIM Ul Wey SAA WOOD Sc katie male TAT I gc “JVI youypyos) 
Sulzds stq} pJoool ON Aely) ang ‘iayoyeoyeuy, 

: suuvway inoxavou  ‘iouruioo ise, “uosaq, fou = oxdm uous S14 31 auld JO AWN 

pesiq yse0q = 4! 8] yi sem uo 2! pip way M SEM Ue MOY JnoGyY Sem USM 


\ 


THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


100 


ySIY UddS I eUId T 


JoqUIM JSP] UOMMOD 
ulids siq} Sp109901 ON 


Sulids siq} Sp10901 ON 
Suuids siq} Sp10001 ON 
VOHNGHISIP paywyy 


Sutids sty} Ssp10901 ON 


aiay Sspooiq 9914} Sey 

Sulids sty} 1aMaT 
Sulids sty} Ssptosa1 ON 
Sulids sty} Ssp10901 ON 


SUUVAaY 


Sox 
sax 
Sox 


Sox 


SOR 


SIA 
SOA 


SIA 
sax 


SoA 
ON 


SIA 
Sox 


{M017 e]s 
ano’ aneu 
pra yu Ba] 


Lada 10 
uowMmuos) 
Hel 


Iz AVI 
Iz ACI 


BI Avi 
zz AVI 
O@ Ie} 


L-idy 


¢ ACI 


6c -idy 


Lt Key 


juses 
qeR{ 
qt) SEM UO A, 


Ot API 
Il ‘idy 
C1 -idy 
¢ AVI 
Li Av 


b Avy 


“C -idy 


ee ae 


¢ ABN I b Av 
i same 3 | emi I ‘idy 
zi “idy I oI ‘idy 
Cz ACI I zz ABT 
bAeIN (9 z AB 
§ Iz Av 

oe Ap. - S b Av 
bi Avy I z1 ABN 
ge ‘idy I 1c -idy 
zz AVN I Fi Avy 
bidy I 6% Jeyxy 


‘reoA sty} Areniqay ul Ajiva sues 


¢ -idy 
ady 
“aIdy 


N 


fo) 


g ady 


tz ‘idy 


t IBY 
bz AVN 


juounmoa 


UOIWNALI}sSIp poyuly vw Sey 


I -idy I ve “1B 
Of “Ie z bz “1eyN 
8 ‘idy I Leidy 


Sulids sty} Sp10991 ON 


Lyidy g ‘idy 
oz ‘idy I 61 -idy 
I “IRI I gc “Gay 
6 AVN t g ARN 


payoeq-aayoO ‘Yysnayy 

* yurrey ‘Ysniyy 
uMOIg ‘Iayseiyy 
yapTeoG ‘1aseuv yl 
“AQUUNIY “FJIMG 

ddI], ‘MOT[EMS 
pesuim-ysnoy ‘MoTyems 
uleg ‘MOT[VMS 
po}voryy-on YM ‘Morreds 
paumois-ayIG AM ‘Morreds 
Jadsoq ‘mMoriedsg 

ao1y ‘Morredg 

su0g ‘morreds 
Jaddoyssein ‘morieds 
xOy ‘motIvds 

Pleat ‘Morreds 
Suiddiyg ‘morreds 
ParqMous 

wos ‘adiug 

aut “UIASIG 
peoyiesso’y ‘axtIys 
Jayonsdesg 

Aieyyjos ‘radidpues 
peqodg ‘rzodidpues 
Diqe gd 

JAeISpIy 

yodpay 

puvldyg ‘1A0] 


quis AO ANWVYN 


5 Sulids siq} o1¥ yy ON ‘Wood zz Avi Iz At I Ot AVI sasseuuay, ‘lapqie Ay 
= Sutids siq} sp10s01 ON JIOWIBIAS ‘IITqIB AM 
Sutids sty} sp10s9e1 ON aeig ‘Iayqie\y 
Sutids sty} s18 yy ON ‘wood b ACY I v AVI dug ‘IajqieAy 
ON “10>, = Lr Avi 9 AVI ¢ AVN I b Avy uyed ‘1pqieyy 
SUuLIdS SIY} Sp10991 ON PIUMOIN-IBULIO ‘I9IqIe A 
sulids sty} sp1ooe1 ON epnieg ‘1a[qieM 
g ON wey 2 Avy gi Avy I b AVI DIPLAYSeN ‘“Toyqie Ay 
a ON "Wop <~eAvpy 61 sady er -ady I zi ‘idy dTMAyy ‘pqse My 
a ON o1ey Of Avy I of Av Suruinoyy ‘laqieM 
2 Sulids siq} Jomo ON ‘“wop Lz Avy cz Avy iz Avy ¢ 61 Avy BYOUSRTY ‘TaqIiVAy 
= Sutids sty} amd ON —cur0D ze Avy tz AVN I + Avy pepis-InussyD “epqie ny 
Zz sulids siy} Spi0os91 ON Avyy odeg ‘iopqiey 
me Sulids sty} Sp10d01 ON UPIPEULD ‘Io[qie\y 
< ON ‘wo Ez Avy 61 Avy SI Ae I b KRW uaaIg 
a poeo1yi-yov ‘tpqiem 
> BULIPUT ‘OWOYOY 8 usaG ON 9418 6 Av I 6 AVI ant 
z 5 4 po eo1yy-yoR[g ‘TeyTqie AN 
ra ON  “ulog Fe Arty ez Avyy Ic Avy ¥ 61 Avy yod-yoerg ‘reyqieMy 
° , ONGy = sW0g)), 8So ABT fz ABI I 61 AVIN ueluInGyoV[, ‘Ioyqie\ 
rs ON 918 L AeIN g ALIN I C AVF SUM pues yoRi_ ‘Ts[qie Ay 
is ON “WoD gz Ary 9 gz ARIN poiseoiq-Aeg ‘1o[qIe Ay 
aa ON ey gz Avy zi Avy I b Avy pe}eoiyi-MoTeA ‘Oot 
doy OVA JSOUOIMMIOD Sax ‘“UWIOD L ACW g ABW S ¢ APY SUlqieA\ ‘OdItA 
: spoom doaeop ul s}saNn ON ‘“wod Lt Avy 91 Avy I g AB poAo-poy ‘ool 
sutids s1y} p10001 ON popvsy-anj[g ‘oom, 
A[iv[nsoin waeG ON ey Sr Avy I VI AV poyny ‘gsnow yy 
“ ASME SITIUI UIAVS POOM B UL UIIG ON dey 5 z gz ARI poom ‘ysnigy 


655 ARE 


‘Qiay SIdAtasqe 0} BuNUIOddesip yJUOM IY} Opeur pure ‘s[qeuOsvosuN SEM Avy Ul Joy}eIM IVY T— _@ “N 


H 
n 
- 
Ho 
a 
4 
=) 
H 
a 
Z 
Q 
Z, 
a 
=i 
a 
~ 
= 
2 
a 
(3) 
_ 
m4 
w 
= 
<a 
wZ 
ee) 
Bb 


sox “WoD gi Av 9g ARIN I ¢ AVI puvypAreyy “eorty MOT[IA 
sutids sty} ptooet ON SSITMOTPA 
Sulids siy} Sspi1ose1 ON YsiIvy, pe[iq-suo’T ‘Woy 
Zutids sty} Sp1oosl ON BUTOIe, “Us 
SA. WI0D De diye = Ocala Vy I 61 -idy ssnoyY ‘UsIM 
J9}UIM [BW peAeIG SIR ‘“WOD) IeoA siy} o}eisiM Jou pIq pepeeIy-pIy ‘rayqoad poom 
sutids sty} sptose1 ON ON 218% Aney ‘iayoedpoo 
Suiids ul o1v1 AlaA Sulids Siq} SpIO991 XIS Aumoqd ‘1ayosvdpooM 
Sutids Sty} Sp1ose1 ON ; spoom dosep ur punoy [pim-tood-diy 
Sulids Siq} Sp1ooe1 ON BUBISINO’T ‘YSNIY}-1oye 
saxk> “wod g API f ACWW I b ACN MOT[PA ‘IOTqIEM 
Sulids sity} sey ON ‘“WOD cz ABI I Zt ABIX WOSTIM ‘La[qie Ay 
N {uous {OAR 00 juees quOWUtOS juees juoos juves 
2 SHUVNAY ANOS 4890 BOUTON ISU} 209 dQ ixou Wf O49M SUBUE = 3S} 41 aut 40 AWYN 


Povatg Ff 8900 KUM WAY AY MW pip mom Ay SUM Doggy MOG }NEGY SUA UIy KY 


SPLEEN EGIL ESR Oe a 


~~ 
= ss 


AN ALL-DAY BIRD TRIP 103 


An All-Day Bird Trip at Washington, D. C. 


BY HARRY C. OBERHOLSER. 


The spring of 1907 was a remarkable season for birds in the 
vicinity of Washington, D. C. Particularly was this the case with 
migrants, and in most other parts of the eastern United States 
these were also unusually: numerous both in species and in individ- 
uals. It was the writer’s privilege to make an all-day trip on May13 
of that year and the results seem worth a permanent record. For 
number of species observed in one day, it was, up to that time, the 
best record made by a single individual about the City of Washington 
and, in fact, there is to this day only one better. 

The weather during much of the spring of 1907 was unusually 


cool, and this apparently had considerably retarded the general 


migration of the later species. May 13 was clear and decidedly cool, 
an ideal day for bird observation. 

From the northern part of the City of Washington, the 
route followed was through the valley of Rock Creek to the National 
Zoological Park and Cleveland Park; thence by electric car through 
the city to the Anacostia River at the Anacostia Bridge; from there 
the route was by rowboat up the Anacostia River to a short distance 
above Bladensburg, Maryland, and back, with three short excurs- 
ions on land at as many different points by the way. The return 
home from the Anacostia River was made by électric car through 
the city. The time occupied by this trip extended from 4:00 a.m. 
to g:00 p.m. The distance covered was 32 miles, distributed as 
follows: by electric car 9, by boat 16, and on foot 7 miles. — 

The region traversed included almost all the diferent kinds of 
country found about Washington, and our excursion thus resulted 
in a representative list of birds. 

The number of species observed on this day amounted to 103, 
with a total of 1846 individuals. The following species were unusu- 
ally numerous for this locality: yellow-shafted flicker, Carolina 
chickadee, tufted titmouse, white-eyed vireo, American redstart, 
Maryland yellow-throat, and yellow warbler. From the actual 
number of individuals noted, the ten most numerous species 
were the song sparrow, English sparrow, catbird, American redstart, 
purple grackle, American crow, fish crow, Maryland yellow-throat. 


104 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


spotted sandpiper, and American goldfinch. Although the number 
of species seen was so large, it included very few of the rarer birds 
of this vicinity, that possibly of most interest being the blue-winged 
warbler. In view of the backwardness of the season, there were 
surprisingly few very late records made on this day. T'wo ducks, the 
golden-eye and pintail, however, were present later than in any 
previous or subsequent year, while the junco had remained also 
much beyond its ordinary date of departure. 

In the following annotated list in order to show the differences 
in the conspicuousness of the various birds, the number of each 
species seen is given separately from those that were only heard. 
This is of further interest as showing how large a part the notes of 
birds play in their identification in the field. 


1. Black-crowned Night Heron. Nycticorax nycticorax naevius. 
Common on parts of the Anacostia River. Number seen, 14. 
2. Green Heron. Butorides virescens virescens. 
Two seen on Anacostia River near Bladensburg. 


3. Great Blue Heron. Ardea herodias herodias. 

One seen in the same place as the last above named. 
4. Greater Scaup Duck. Marila marila. 

Three were seen on the Anacotia River neai Benning. 
5. American Golden-eye. Clangula clangula americana. 

Three seen on the Anacostia River near Benning constitute 
the latest spring record for the species in the vicinity of 
Washington, the next latest occurrence being April 27, 1918. 

6. Pintail. Dafila acuta tzttzthoa. 

A single individual seen on the Anacostia River is also the 
latest spring record for this species about Washington, the next 
latest being April 17, 1915. 

American Merganser. Mergus americanus. 

‘Two seen on the Anacostia River. 


“I 


8. Turkey Vulture. Cathartes aura septentrionalis. 
Common on the Anacostia River and in other parts of the 
more open country. Noted also early in the morning roosting 
in trees along Rock Creek. Number seen, 46. 
9g. American Osprey. Pandion haliaetus carolinensis. 
’ One seen on the Anacostia River. 


10. Red-shouldered Hawk. /futeo lineatus lineatus. 


eto 


20. 


2 


PAB 


BR: 


24. 


A 


AN ALL-DAY BIRD TRIP 105 


Two seen and two others heard on the bottomlands of the 
Anacostia River. 
Broad-winged Hawk. Sbuteo platypterus platypterus. 

One seen in the woods along Rock Creek in the Zoological 
Park. 
Bob-white. Colinus virginianus virginianus. 

Two heard in the fields near Bladensburg. 
Lesser Yellow-legs. Neoglottis flavipes. 

Two seen in the marshes along the Anacostia River. 
Solitary Sandpiper. Jvinga solitaria solitaria. 

Common along the Anacostia River, and noted also on 
Rock Creek; 13 seen. 
Spotted Sandpiper. Actitts macularia. 

Abundant on the Anacostia River, and noticed also on Rock 
Creek; 48 seen; 5 heard. 
Semipalmated Sandpiper. LEreunetes pusillus. 

A flock of 6 seen on the shore of Anacostia River. 
Mourning Dove. Zenaidura macroura carolinensis. 

Two seen near the Anacostia River. 
Northern Flicker. Colaptes auratus luteus. 

Noted in nearly all woodlands; 7 seen; 14 heard. 
Red-headed Woodpecker. Melanerpes erythrocephalus erythro- 
ephalus. 

Six heard, chiefly along Rock Creek. 
Downy Woodpecker. Dryobates pubescens medianus. 

Two seen and one heard in the woods along the Anacostia 
River. 
Belted Kingfisher. Streptoceryle alcyon alcyon. 

Three seen, one heard, on the Anacostia River. 
Screech Owl. Otus asio naevius. . 

One seen at its roosting hole in a tree along Rock Creek. 


Ruby-throated Hummingbird. Archilochus colubris. 

One seen in the woods along the Anacostia River. 
Chimney Swift. Chaetura pelagica. 

Common in the city and elsewhere along the route; 39 seen; 
7 heard. 
Wood Pewee. Hortzopus virens. 2 

Noted along Rock Creek and in the woodlands bordering the 
Anacostia River; 2 seen; 7 heard. 


106 


20. 


iss) 
2 


40. 


Al. 


- 


THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Acadian Flycatcher. Empidonax virescens. 
One seen and one heard along Rock Creek. 
Least Flycatcher. Empidonax minimus. 
Two heard in the woodlands along the Anacostia River. 


VYhoebe. Sayornts phoebe. 

Two heard along Rock Creek. 
C ested Flycatcher. Myzarchus crinttius crinitus. 

Yolerably common both along Rock Creek and i the wood- 
lands bordering the Anacostia River; g heard. 
Kingbird. J yrannus tyrannis tyrannus. 

Noted only along the Anacostia River and on the adjoining 
uplands; 7 seen; 1 heard. 
Brown Thrasher. Toxostoma rufa rufa. 

Noted in various places along the route; 7 seen; 4 heard. 
Catbird. Lucar carolinensis. 


Numerous everywhere; 31 seen; 53 heard. 
/ 
Bluebird. Szalza sialis stalts. 


Noted in the outskirts of the city, and also on the uplaneae 


along the Anacostia River; 3 seen; 7 heard. 


Southern Robin. Planesticus migratorius achrusterus. 
Observed all along the Anacostia River; 1 seen; 20 heard. 


Wilson Thrush. Hylocichla tuscescens tuscescens. 
Ore heard in the woods along Rock Creek. 
Gray-cheeked Thrush. Hylocichla minima alictae. 
One seen in the woods along the Anacostia River. 
Olive-backed Thrush. Hylocichla ustulata swainsont. 
Tolerably common. in the woodlands both along Rock Creek 
and the Anacostia River; 4 seen; 5 heard. 
Wood Thrust. - Hylocitchla mustelina. 
Abundant in all woodlands; 9 seen; 39 heard. 
Blue-gray Gnatcatcher. Polsoptila caerulea caerulea. — 
Noted in the woods both along Rock Creek and the Anacostia 
River; 2 seen; 2 heard. 
House Wren. Troglodytes aedon aedon. 
Observed chiefly in the woods along Rock Creek; 12 heard. 
Carolina Wren. Thryothorus ludovicianus ludovicianus. 
Noted in woods and thickets along both Rock Creek and the 
Anacostia River; 12 heard, 


AN. ALL-DAY BIRD TRIP 1G7 


42. Wong-billed Marsh Wren. Telmatodytes palustris palustris. 
Abundant in the marshes along the Anacostia River; 1 seen; 
34 heard. 
43. Carolina Chickadee. Penihestes carolinensts carolinensts. 
Noted in nearly all woodlands; 1 seen; 10 heard. 
44. Tufted Titmouse. Saeolophus bicolor. 
Common in woods everywhere; 42 heard. 
45. BluesJay. Cyanoctita cristata crisiata. 
Noted both along Rock Creek and the Anacostia River; 
2 seen; 8 heard. 
46. Fish Crow. Corvus ossttragus. ; 
Noted both in the city and its environs, and along the 
; Anacostia River; 61 seen; 8 heard. 
7 47. Southern Crow. Corvus brachyrhynchos paulus. 
; More numerous than the Fish Crow, and more generally 
distributed; 51 seen; 23 heard. 


zy 48. White-eyed Vireo. Vzreo griseus griseus. 

* Observed in the thickets and undergrowth in the woods, both 
La along Rock Creek and the Anacostia River; 4 seen; 32 heard. 
4 49. Yellow-throated Vireo. _Lanivtreo flavifrons. 

Z Noted in the woodlands along both Rock Creek and the 


Anacostia River; 13 heard. 
50. Red-eyed Vireo. Vzreosylva oltvacea. 
Tolerably common in all woodlands; 6 seen; 13 heard. 
51. Tree Swallow. JIridoprocne bicolor. 
; Noticed along the lower part of the Anacostia River; 13 seen. 
52. Barn Swallow. Hzrundo rustica erythrogastrts. 
Noted chiefly along the Anacostia River; 38 seen; 3 heard. 
53. Bank Swallow. Riparia riparia riparia. 
Hight seen in company with other swallows on the Anacostia 
River. 
54. Rough-winged Swallow. Stelgidopteryx serripennts serripennts. 
Observed chiefly along the Anacostia River, but also’ on 
Rock Creek; 33 seen; 2 heard. 
55. Purple Martin. Progne subis subts. 
Five seen over the Anacostia River. 
56. American Redstart. Setophaga ruticilla. 
Abundant in all woodlands; 36 seen; 42 heard. 
57. Canadian Warbler. Wadlsonia canadensis. 
Two seen along the Anacostia River. 


72. 


73: 


74. 


“ 


, THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Wilson Warbler. Walsonia pusilla pusilla. 

One heard in woodlands along Rock Creek. 
Hooded Warbler. Walsomia citrina. . 

One seen in the same place as the last above named. 
Yellow-breasted Chat. Icteria virens virens. 


Found along Rock Creek and the Anacostia River; 5 heard. 


Maryland Yellow-throat. Geothlypis trichas trichas. 
‘Abundant in thickets everywhere; 18 seen; 39 heard. 


Northern Water-Thrush. Sezurus noveboracensis noveboracensis. 
One seen in woodland on the border of the Anacostia River. 


Louisiana Water-Thrust. Seiurus motacilla. 

Four seen and two heard in the valley of Rock Creek. 
Oven-bird. Sezurus aurocapillus. 

Abundant in all woodlands; 7 seen; 26 heard. 
Kentucky Warbler. Oporornis jormosus. 

One seen along Rock Creek. 
Prarie Warbler. Dendroica discolor. 

Three heard in busy uplands near Bladensburg. 
Pine Warbler. Dendroicaa vigorsi vigorsit. 


Three seen and one heard in pine woods near Bladensburg. 


Black-poll Warbler. Dendroica striata. 

Two seen in woods along the Anacostia River. 
Chestnut-sided Warbler. Dendroica pensylvanica. 

Common in woodlands; 3 seen; 17 heard. 
Blackburnian Warbler. Dendroica fusca. 

Two seen in the woods along Rock Creek. 
Black-throated Green Warbler. Dendroica virens. 


Noted in woodlands along Rock Creek and the Anacostia 


River, . I) seem; 5 heard: 
Myrtle Warbler. Dendroica coronata coronata. 


Common along Rock Creek and in pine woodlands along the 


Anacostia River; 26 seen; 2 heard. 


Black-throated Blue Warbler. Dendroica caerulescens cae- 


rulescens. 


Noted sparingly in the woodlands along Rock Creek and the 


Anacostia River; 2 seen; 4 heard. 
Magnolia Warbler. Dendroica magnolia. 

One seen and three heard in the woods along Rock Creek. 
Yellow Warbler. Dendroica aestiva aestiva. 

Found everywhere in thickets; 1o seen; 36 heard. 


76. 


77- 


7s 


79- 


So. 
SI. 
82. 


83. 


84. 


85. 


86. 
87. 
88. 


89. 


go. 


AN ALL-DAY BIRD TRIP, T09g 


Parula Warbler. Compsothlypis americana americana. 
Common in woodlands; 8 seen; 21 heard. 


Northern Parula Warbler. Compsothlypis americana pusilla. 
One typical male seen in the woods along the Anacostia 
River. 
Blue-winged Warbler. Vérmuivora pinus. 
Two heard singing in thickets near Rock Creek. 
Golden-winged Warbler. Vermivora chrysoptera. 
Two seen in the woods and thickets on the edge of the 
Anacostia River. 
Worm-eating Warbler. Helmitheros vermivorus. 
One seen in the woods along the Anacostia River. 


Black and White Warbler. Muiotilta varia. 
Tolerably common and generally distributed in woodlands; 


Bobolink. Dolichonyx oryzivorus. 
Three heard on the uplands along the Anacostia River. 
Meadowlark. Sturnella magna magna. 
Noted on the outskirts of the city and on the uplands along 
the Anacostia River; 6 heard. 
Red-winged Blackbird. Agelatus phoeniceus predatorius. 
Common in the marshes of the Anacostia River; 9 seen; 
9 heard. ; 
Baltimore Oriole. Icterus galbula. 
Noted both in the outskirts of the city and on the uplands 
along the Anacostia River; 2 seen; 4 heard. 


Orchard Oriole. Icterus spurius. 

One seen in a pine grove near Bladensburg. 
Purple Grackle. Quiscalus quiscula ridgwayt. 

Abundant everywhere; 60 seen; 17 heard... \ 
Scarlet Tanager. Puiranga olivacea. 

Two seen and two heard in the woods along Rock Creek. 
Summer Tanger. Piranga rubra rubra. 

One heard singing on the edge of the woodlands along Rock 
Creek and Cleveland Park. : 
Cardinal. Cardinalis cardinalis cardinalis. 

Common in thickets; 3 seen; 15 heard. 

Rose-breasted Grosbeak. Hedymeles ludovicianus. 

Noted in the woods along Rock Creek; 3 seen; 4 heard. 


bce) THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 
92. Indigo Bunting. Linaria cyanea. : 

Observed in the woods along Rock Creek, in the fields on the 
outskirts of the city, and-on the uplands near Bladensburg; 
4 seen; 3 heard. 

93. Chewink. Prpzilo erythrophthalmus erythrophthalmus. 

Common in thickets, chiefly along Rock Creek and the 
Anacostia River; 5 seen; 13 heard. 

94. Swamp Sparrow. Melospiza georgiana. 
One seen at the head of a tributary of Rock Creek. 
95. Song Sparrow. Melospiza melodia melodia. 

By far the most abundant species observed during the day, 

and very generally distributed; 13 seen; 165 heard. 
96. White-throated Sparrow. Zonotrichia albicollis. 
Common in thickets, chiefly along Rock Creek; two seen; 
17 heard. 
97. Field Sparrow. Spizella pusilla pusilla. 
Tolerably common in fields and pastures;-6 seen; 8 heard. 
98. Chipping Sparrow. Spvzella passerina passerina. 
Common. except in woodlands; 3 seen; 25 heard. 
99. Slate-colored Junco. Junco hyemalis hyemalis. 

One seen in the undergrowth of low woodland near Bladens- 
burg. This date is unusually late for the species, since its 
average time of departure is April 30. 

100. Grasshopper Sparrow. Ammodramus savannarum australis. 

One heard singing in a field near Bladensburg. 

101. English Sparrow. Passer domesticus hostilts. 

Abundant in the city and about gardens in the country; 

53 seen; 81 heard. 
102. Purple Finch. Carpodacus purpureus purpureus. 

One heard singing on the outskirts of the city. 

103. American Goldfinch. Asragalinus tristis trisits. 
Common almost everywhere; 9 seen; 43 heard. 


4 geography, ‘should, be addressed to the editor. 


as, Meu hundred reprints of. _articles ‘ averaging 
“eight pages or more will be furnished free of charge 


consist of less than eight pages, a certain number 


which the paper appeared will’ be supplied free, or 


provided the contributions are sent in for the next 


articles will receive a free subscription for the year 
‘in which their paper appears... Kor further or other 
. information address : 

. _ Tur Epiror, Notre Dame, Indiana 


: peers: 


Bae Contributions on “general end midland Satdical 
history “will, be- gladly received. Papers on botany — 
and allied subjects, zoology,’ geology and physical. 
: _ Matters. relating to advertisements. ane. £9. 0 be. 
RR taken up with the secretary of, the University. hates 
to contributors. More than one hundred, separates can. 
be. obtained at. ‘cost price of the extras. When articles: 


of copies of THE “AMERICAN Mipnanp. NATURALIST in. > 


the separate ‘articles may, by arrangement with the 
editor, be kept until future papers average eight pages, — 


consecutive issue for publication. Contributors of 


SLES REAL AI ES ESTE RRS EE RE 


RRR 


te 


nc 
are 


Gi 


y 
=) 


anita areas 


Cs 


me 


eee NC hot re 


ae 


L 


The 
Gniversity of Notre Dame 


NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


College of Arts and Letters. 


Departments of Ancient Classics, 


Modern Literature, _ History, 
Political Economy, Sociology, 
Domestic Commerce, Foreign 


Commerce, Journalism, Library 
Science. 


College of Science. 


Departments of Chemistry, 


Physics, Biology, Pharmacy, 
Agriculture. 
College of Architecture. 


Departments of Construction, 


Design. 


Preparatory School. 


Variant Courses, 


College of Law. 


College of Engineering. 
Departments of Civil Engineering: 


Mechanical Engineering, 
Electrical Engineering, Chemical 
Engineering, Mining Engineering, 
Industrial Engineering. 


Colle e of Fine Arts. 


Departments of Artistic Drawing, 


Painting, Cartooning, Instrumental - 


Music, Vocal Music. 


St. Edward Hall. 
For Young Boys. 


Notre Dame is recognized by all educators, by the press and 
by the public as a college whose work is of the same grade as 
that of the most highly endowed colleges or the best state unty- 
sities. Its atmosphere is strongly Catholic and no, young man who 
has ever attended the University of Notre Dame can escape its 
influence in after life. 


The discipline is paternal, and aims at giving young men the 
fullest. liberty consistent with earnest study and manly Christian 


character. Rooms at reasonable rates. _ Catalogue sent on 


application. 


Address: 
THE REGISTRAR 


NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


Bee Se ese See se oe soe se Se Sr aes 


~ - s 
Xc fi 
aN 

ae 
1) v ] 
¥ ID) 
- 
4 a Ad 
ASS 
D 
j 


es Si as oe - ai : Z $05 rE ig Ba bes Ae a ; Se ra 2 = 


aS 


”- s = 
PER nr oo oe ee 
CO AEN 


ga 
cS 


Po -d 


STS 
WS 


aN, 


Et 


Beer won Vt, eh JANUARY, 1920, NO. 7 


wwii MIDLAND 
NATURALIST 


Devoted to Natural History, Primarily 
that of the Prairie States 


Ap yee ; 
Published by the University of Notre Dame): ae Oy sa 
Notre Dame, Indiana sd i ef) 

Bayer. ]. A. NIEUWLAND; C, S.C., PhiD.;’Sc. D., Editor «° 
oo | CONTENTS 
8 Household Insects and their Remedies. By, W. Scheib 111 
i 3 Aquatic Life: With Special Reference to Entomostraca. 
ee! Joseph Stack. 128 
y Our Birds in November. Brother Alphonsus, C- S.C. 145 
+, Notes on Variation in Chicory. N.M..Grier,.Ph. D> 148 
_..°*. Our Birds in December. Brother Alphonsus, C. S.C. 149 
LI Tan oe cmd 
, PRICE $1.50 A YEAR ; SINGLE NUMBERS 30 CENTS 


FOREIGN, 6s. 6d. 


7 Entered as second-class matter at Notre Dame, Indiana. Acceptance for mailing at special 
rate of postage provided for in section 1103, Act of October 3, 1917, 
authorized on July 3, 1918. 


THE UNIVERSITY PRESS, NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


‘Vol. I —(1909~1910) 293 po Unhowd oh se ae RU Piles OWN See § 
Vol. IIl.—(1911-1912). 330 pp. Unbound and exclusive of 3 Reprints 
to be bound in end of vol 
Inclusive of Three Reprints (see below). Hatin eee eae, i 25. 
Vol. IIl. —(r1913-1914). 383 pp. Unbound, exclusive of Reprint No. 4. 
(See below). [Nos. 1, 2,3, 7. ) are scarce and nearly out of print, 


GOSH 56 Cts: eae hols She eg ae ea it oa Rio tee as 
Inclusive of Reprint No. 4, ae oe es ie Ds a edn SS Nae a 
Vol. TV.— (1915-1916), Unbound 2 ee a ee vee, yh 
Vol. Matto 1918) Unbound... Big ac Wark rey oe SES 73 Opa 
ay ew Total—$tz, 75 
Publications: 
HAHN, W. Analytic Study of Faunal Changes in Indiana, 2 plates, as 
TOTO) SF MP ws Se Be he ee et a as ren eae ns, 
GREENE, E. L. Leaflets of Botanical Observation soa Criticism. » Soe 
2vols Complete. (1903-1912) 2:.--.24 6.0Gi.-Ae: 
“E ” --- Cybele Columbiana, A series of Studies in Botany, =i 
chiefly North American. No. 1. (Other num- 
PETS TO POLTOW ek ete we ee ee eR ne ee aOR eae rg 
tg 7 Pittonia, A series of Papers Realting to Botany and ae 
Botanists, 5 vols. (1887-1905 )..-22ccccen-seeficteened 14.00 
Sig ? Flora Franciscana, Parts I, II, III. [Part IV pub- 


lished ‘long after the other parts, is quite 
unobtainable, as all copies not immediately — 
distributed seem to have been lost in the San 


Francisco fire.] Price as published... -2.00 

a ye Manual.of the Botany of the Region of San Fran- f 
cisco Bay (1894). Bound cloth... 2.00.5) 4 
Witboun Gee ee ee ee oh, SS Rn 1.50 
(Price as published of latter)... 00.2 “2.00 

UTTERBACK, W. I. Naiades of Missouri, 200 pp. 29 pl. and some text 
; PIP UTES roe AU ede eB et econ mee a 75 

3 Reprints. 

RAFINESOUR, O.'S.)\jNeopenytoi; (TB as )pen gee a ee $ 425 
” Hi The Natural Family of the Carexides (1840)... .50 
is “3 Seadiography: or 100 Genera of Ombelliferous 

Plants setes (1 840). eS Nee eae te 1.50 
% “ff Monographie des Cogquilles Bivalves et Fluvia- 


tiles de la Riviere Ohio. Remarques sur les 

Rapports Naturels des Genres Viscum, Samolus © 

et Viburnum. “A Bruxelles (1820)-2..2.:2. 02. Li50 
LEConrTE, J. B. Reprints of Monographs without plates, $2:50; with 

42 photographic copies of unpublished plates 

(7x8), $25.00; with colored photographic plates...$37.50 
LeEConrTrsE, J. E... Two extra plates reproduced from originals in N. Y. 

Bot. Garden. Colored, $1:50;*uncolored_......_.-._.1.00: 


See Anierican Midland Naturalist 


- PUBLISHED BI-MONTHLY BY THE UNIVERSITY 
OF NOTRE DAME, NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


VOLE= V1: JANUARY, 1920. NO. 7 


Household Insects and their Remedies. Smithsenia> 


—_— , 
ag; 
i \ 


BY B. W. SCHEIB. 


PREFACE. a) | ; 

Household insects are demanding more attention today than 
ever before. In the careful research for the causes of human diseases 
it has been found that many of these pests are carriers of bacteria 
and disease. In addition to this, they are very annoying and also 
do hundreds of dollars worth of damage to clothes, household 


furnishings and. supplies. During the past years, the author of 


this essay has had a great many inquiries for exterminating 
them. In nearly every case the housewives readily recognized the 
insects but were not acquainted with the best methods of control. 
Thus a scientific technical description of each insect was thought 
to be unnecessary and, in the descriptions given, the writer has 
tried to use such language that would be readily understood by 
the average housewife. Usually the housewife is not interested in the 
insects further than to eradicate the pests. With this in view, the 
writer has tried to set forth the simplest and most economical 
remedies for the destruction of some of the most common household 
insects. The author does not claim to have originated all of these 
remedies but they have been carefully gleaned from various sources. 
Nearly all of these remedies have been tried by the writer or on 
recommendation to his friends and have been found to be most 
satisfactory. 


THE Houses FLy. 


The most common and most widely distributed household 
pest is the common house fly (Muscu domestica). ‘This insect is 
now attracting wide attention as a carrier of disease. It has been 
known -to carry typhoid fever, tuberculosis, cholera, cholera 
infantum and dysentery and no doubt a great many other diseases. 


1 O74 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Its early stages are passed in some moist, decaying matter, generally | : 


horse manure or barn yard filth. It is not an uncommon thing 
to find flies feeding on sputum and all kinds of filth; thus they 


. pick up a great number of harmful bacteria on their feet, mouth ~ 


and hairs and are carried to groceries and other eatables of all 
sorts. Dr. L. O. Howard has estimated that the house fly is the 
cause of 250,000 typhoid fever cases in America. As a genera] 
rule flies do not travel more than two or three hundred yards away 
from their breeding place. Bacteria have been known to live in 
flies for three weeks. Thus flies can distribute bacteria in a great 


many places without revisiting the source from which it first 


received its deadly germs. 
Since flies are known to carry disease, it is very essential 


to do everything to get rid of them in our homes. Proper screen- — 


ing of the house is one of the first requisites. The next step should 
be to remove their breeding places. Manure should be removed 
at least once a week. Chloride of lime sprinkled over the manure 
each day will to a large extent prevent their breeding. 
a 
Flies may be killed by using the following: 
1 oz of formalin 40% 

16 oz of sweet milk 

16 oz of water 
Pour this into a dish and set it where the flies can get at it. 
It is always well to float a piece of cork or blotting paper on the 
liquid so the flies can have more room to eat. Flies eat this readily 
and are killed by the thousands. 

II. 

The following has been used with good success: 

I cup brown sugar 

1 cup of formaldehyde 
Mix the two together. Should the solution dry up a little water 
can be added from time to time. 

III. / 


Take an infusion of 

Quassia 1 pt , 

Brown sugar 4 0z 

-Ground pepper 2 0z 
To be well mixed together and put in small shallow che: 
where required. 2 


nS = er 


r 
» 
— ee 


{ 


Ps 


a 
* 


% 


tl 7 wg oF ess 


eS Nn a 


Re? ae ee eee PE rats oR NA OR: ei vie tet tS as aa , leas hia - > 


‘ * od : . 


‘ 


HOUSEHOLD INSECTS AND THEIR REMEDIES 113 


IV. 
Take some jars, mugs or tumblers, fill them half full with 


soapy water; cover them as jam pots are covered with a piece of 


paper, either tied down or tucked under a rim. Let this be rubbed 
inside with wet sugar, mollasses, honey or jam or anything sweet. 
Cut a small hole in the center large enough for a fly to enter. 
The flies settle on the top attracted by the smell of the bait; they 
then crawl through the hole, to feed upon the sweet beneath. 
Meanwhile the warmth of the weather causes the soapy water 
to ferment, and produces a gas which overpowers the flies and they 
drop down into the vessel. Thousands may be destroyed this way 
and the traps last a long time. 


Vv. 
Fly traps and tanglefoot also help in reducing the amount of 
flies. | 
. VI. 
It is not always possible to avoid collections of manure, but 


these collections or piles may be sterilized successfully and made 


impossible as breeding nests simply by the generous Uistribution 
of sulphate of iron, in liquid or dry form. - It gives better results 
than kerosene, for it does not harm-the manure, and the cost is 
very light. It penetrates everywhere. By keeping constantly 
in the stable a barrel of this solution of a strength of about two 
pounds for each gallon of water and using a common sprinkler can, 
the sterilization would be accomplished at an approximate cost of 
less than 1 cent per horse per day. Making sanitary all other 
breeding spots, such as garbage cans and privy boxes may be 
accomplished by the liquid solution or dry sugar sulphate of iron 
being distributed freely, thus checking in the earliest stages the 
development of fly maggots. ‘And this is the time for effective work, 
because the fly larvae or eggs are exceedingly tenacious of life. 
Sulphate of iron, being a deodorizer, also removes from the manure 


pile, the urine soaked stable drains, the outhouse and the garbage 


pile the pungent ammoniacal fumes and other offensive smells. 
Use of this chemical in cellars where rotting vegetables may be 
found purifies the air. a 

Cloride of lime is also good. 


MOsQuITOES. 


There are a great many species of mosquitoes. They are 


II4 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


) 
not only a nuisance but are also conveyors of malaria, yellow 
fever and denque fever. In some localities a great deal of work 
has been done to rid the communities of this pest. The immature 
stage are found in water. ‘hey breed in any place where there is 
open water. Rain water barrels, tin cans, water troughs and 
stagnant mud holes are generally the breeding places of these 
pests. The eggs are laid on top of the water in rafts and as they 
hatch the larva begin feeding upon the minute vegetable and 
organic matter found in the water. ‘The first step toward exter- 
minating mosquitoes should always be to destroy their breeding 
places. 
Destroying Breeding Places. 


One of the best methods is to pour oil upon the surface of 
the water. All ponds and mud puddles that can be drained should 
be drained. Rain water barrels and all vessels holding water 
should be screened. Frequently if the weeds are cut around 
ditches and low depressions holding water the breeding place will 
dry out immediately. 

All tin cans should be buried or disposed of immediately. 
All ornamental fish ponds and water gardens should be supplied 
with fish that will eat the wrigglers. 


_ Screens. 


Every home should have the windows and doors thoroughly 
screened. Twenty meshes to the inch can be relied upon to keep 
mosquitoes out but fifteen to the inch is better. When mosquitoes 
are very. numerous the screens should be painted lightly with 
kerosene or oil of citronella. When buying screens it will be found 
to be more economical to buy the brass wire screen as it will not 


rust out like iron wire screen. The proper housing and painting - 


of screens will lengthen their period of usefulness materially. 
Smudges and Fumigants. 

Anything that will make a dense smoke will drive away 
mosquitoes. ‘The writer has found that straw makes an excellent 
smudge for out-door parties. Campers frenquently use dried leaves. 
For household use other material must be used. 

; i: 
Pyrethrin Powder. 


Pyrethrin Powder can be purchased at any drug store. The 
powder should be heaped up on a tin pan in the form of a cone 


ay ee ey a) ba 


“7 <<. ee oe 


mihad iti : 
HOUSEHOLD INSECTS AND THEIR REMEDIES 115 


and the tip then lighted. It burns quite readily and makes a 
dense pugent smoke. If the powder does not burn well it can 
be sprinkled over red hot coals. This method is not very effective 
_ where the windows are left open. The essential thing is the volatile 
‘oil given off into the room from the burning powder aid stupifies 
the insect. 
Il. 
Jimson Weed. 

‘Dr. John B. Smith recommends the following: 

I oz of salt peter 
3 oz powdered jimson weed (Dotura siramonium). 

About ten ounces of this should be burned per 1,000 cubic 
feet of space. He states that the fumes are not injurious to humans, 
fabrics or metal. The powder should be burned on a tin pan or 
shovel. 

Rita ci III. 

_ _Nimms Culicide. 

' Mix equal parts by weight of carbolic acid crystals and gum 
of camphor. The carbolic acid crystals are melted over a gentle 
heat and poured over the gum. The gum is dissolved and the 
resultant is a clear liquid with a»pleasing ordor. ‘The vapor is 
not injurious to human beings except when very dense, but it will 
~ produce headache if breathed too freely. Rooms should be as 
.nearly air tight as possible. 


IV. 
Protection from Bites. M 
One of the best mixtures to oP mosquitoes away is made 
from the following: 


Oil of citronella 1 OZ 
Spirits of camphor I OZ 
Oil of cedar Wy oz 


_A few drops on a bath towel and hung on the head of the bed 
will keep the common mosquito away fora time. Where mosquitoes 
are real bad some of the liquid should be rubbed on the face and 
hands. This mixture will not last the entire night. 


i Vv. 
Mr. E. H. Gane of New York remmonds the following to 
3 avoid the odor of the oil of citronella. 
ee Castor oil I OZ 

Alcohol I OZ 


y16 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


VI. 
The writer has found the following to be e‘ective: - 
Kerosene I OZ 
. Oil. of cedar I Oz 
Oil of citronella I OZ 


Place a few drops on clothes and hang them near the bed. 
‘The odor of this is not offensive. . 


Cock ROACHES. 

Cock roaches eat any kind of food, and frequently do a great 
deal of damage. “They are nocturnal and live in damp, dark places. 
generally about sinks or water places, flour bins and pantries. 
They have a nauseating odor and want to live around garbage. The 
thoughts of eating the food is intolerable. By some they are thought 
to be carriers of disease. There are four kinds of roaches in this 
country: The American Cock Roach (Periplaneia americana Linn), 


the Oriental Cock Roach (Blaita orientallis Linn), Australian Roach - 


(Periplaneta australasiae Fab) and the German Roach or “‘ Ceroton 
Bug” (Blatella germanica Linn). 

They are wingless and all have flat, thin bodies, and strong, 
bitting jaws. As they live in cracks and under objects it is not 
easy to exterminate them. Boiling water and good soap suds will 
aid some in keeping down this pest. Dr. Hodges -states the -bat 
and the common toad to be very e‘fective in exterminating this pest. 


is 


Borax is the best cock roach exterminator yet discovered. The 
cockroach has a peculiar aversion to it, and will never return 
where it has been once scattered. This salt is perfectly harmless 
to human being and is to be much preferred. 

ee Il. 

A mixture of red lead, corn meal and mollasses will be eaten 

eagerly by them and will soon exterminate them. 
III. 

Large numbers may be killed by setting out two shallow dishes, 
one containing flour and plaster of Paris mixed together and the 
other water. Use four parts of flour to one part of plaster of 
Paris. Arrange the dishes so that roaches can easily climb on 
them and from one dish to the other. ’ 

IV. 

Make a strong decoction of poke roots, when the strength is 

out of the roots, mix the liquor with molasses and spread it on 


PT ee es ee A eee 


A ‘ 
— Te CS a 


pe Ee a, 


HOUSEHOLD INSECTS AND THEIR: REMEDIES phat 


| large plates in the places a frequent. They may be thus slain 


by the thousands. 
Vv. 

Mix ial parts of Persian insect powder and powdered 
Levantic wormseed, and scatter the mixture about the places 
which cock roaches frequent. 

VI. 

Carbon bistlphite may also be used as a fumigant and will 

undoubtedly prove satisfactory if used in sufficient quantities. 


This, however, is very inflamable and one must be careful about 
fire. 


VII. 
Equal parts of 2% carbolic acid and 2 0z.gum camphor dissolved 
poured into eracks will get them out where they may easily be 
killed. 
VIII. 
Burning pyrethium in infested places is very eifective. Room 


should be closed for several hours. 


IX, 
Phosphorus paste, which may be purchased at drug stores is 
claimed to be satisfactory. 
© afaets 
Seatter cucumber parings around the parts of the house 
troubled with these vermins. 


* House CRICKET. 
(Gryllus domesticus Linn) 


These insects are quite common and at times do considerable 
damage to clothing. They often damage clothes hung in a dark 
and damp closet or clothespress; also hiding in fireplaces, pantries 
and baseboards. ‘The house cricket shows a special fondness for 
liquids such as milk, and may be found in the milk pans if left 
uncovered. ‘The crickets vary from brown to black aceording to 
the species. The head has two very long antennae, the hind legs are 
large and strongly developed for jumping. ‘The chirping is done 
entirely by the male by elevating the outer wings or tegminae, and 
then scraping them together, one over the other, thus producing a 
vibration. It is-supposed to bea call from the male to the female. 


1s 
Crickets like milk, fresh potatoes, carrots; so many are killed 


118 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


by putting arsenic in the liquid and sprinkling a little on a scraped 
potato or carrot. 
iat 

Some find putting a little chloride of lime and powdered tobacco 
in their holes very effective. 

ll. 

Sprinkle a little quicklime near to the cracks through which 
they enter the room. The lime may be laid down at night and 
swept up early in the morning, as it must be kept entirely away 
from children. This kills many of the crickets and drives them away 
from the house. : 

THE LiTTLE RED ANT. 

(Monomorium pharaonis Linn) 

The origin of this species is unknown but it is supposed to have 

been imported. This is one of the most despised, troublesome 

and prolific of household pests. They nest in partitions, under 

floors, in all cracks and crevices where it is hard to reach them. 

These insects pass their entire existance in houses. They are about 
one-twentieth of an inch in length. 

Another ant which is also a nuisance is the black ant. Ants 
particularly like sugar, syrup and other sweets. Ants are not so 
destructive to the household supplies, but their faculty of getting 
into everything makes them very disagreeable to say the least. 

Those that are commonly known are all workers. The females 
stay in the colony and are known by being wingless. These wings 
are torn off as soon as the ants begin mating. The male usually 
dies and the female at once goes to her duty of establishing new 
colonies. Unless the colony ¢an be reached and destroyed all other 
measures will be of only temporary relief. 

E. 


If these nests can be reached, a little kerosene or bisulphide 
of carbon sprayed or injected, is very effective. 
LE 
Fumigation with hydrocyafic acid gas is advisable in old 
and badly infested houses. Care must be used with this gas. 
UI. 


To keep ants from climbing upon tables, cupboards, etc., 
place the legs in small dishes or pans of kerosene or water. 


HOUSEHOLD INSECTS AND THEIR REMEDIES 119 


IV. 

The writer has found it very etfective to keep everything 
out of the way of these pests. By care they can be done away 
with almost as easily as flies. 

Vv. 

A few leaves of green wormwood scattered on shelves, etc., 
is good for black ants. 

2 Powderéd borax sprinkled in shelves, etc., will aid greatly 
in eradicating the pest. 


VI. 

Some people advise using methods of attracting the ants, such 
as a*sponge soaked in sugar and water, and as they gather on the 
sponge, dip quickly in hot water. Also placea little poison is sugar, 
lard, etc, and some have found this e“ective. 


aly 


ss - =e Cae ey ee so) : a he =s elie oe ss a a: — as i bt ol sats ere 
} : ~~ : St NGS ee ne ee ee ee > 
: : oe Pa mea id 
‘ Lee ae oe 


.» 


SOUTHERN CLOTH Moru. 


“« 


- 


(Tincola viselliella) 
This moth is straw color without spots. The larva spins 
a silken web, eats hair; feathers and furs. ; 


THE CASE-MAkING CLOTHES MoTH. 


\ 


(Tinea pelitonella Linn) 


- 


These moths, or millers as they are called, are harmless in 
themselves. ‘Their mission is to lay the eggs for the next generation. 
These moths are night fliers and one sees them about dusk or 
during the evening flying about in the dark corners of the room. 
They are seldom seen during the daytime except when driven from 

their hiding place. The adult moth is very small and delicate. 
It measures 2-5 of an inch when its wings are expanded. Its fore 
wings are yellowish-gray, marked with a few undefined brownish 
spots and fringed toward the outer portion of the posterior margin. 
The hind wings are of a uniform size, about % of the length of the 
fore wings. Its posterior margin has a wide fringe gradually 
increasing in length toward the base or wing attachment. 
Their minute white eggs are usually layed in some dark corner 
on carpets, woolen goods, furs, and ete. The eggs hatch into a 
small brown headed caterpillar. The larva begins feeding at 
once and at the same time constructing a small, bag-like case 
which is made of fragments of wool. The case is enlarged from 
time to time as the caterpillar grows. When the caterpillar is 


‘ 


SO OR ee ee I et LF) PH OL ECS ees ay Pe 


es 


im 2 E - ¢ 12 fi yy 
~~ 


120 HE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST | 


full grown it closes up the case and goes into the pupa state. They ‘: 
emerge from these cases usually in July or August. There are: 
two other species of clothes moths. 


TAPESTRY MOTH. 
(Trichophhaga tapetzelia) 

The vasal half of the fore wing ofthis moth is white and the 
rest of the wing is black. ‘The larva construct burrows in which 
it spins its silken lining. It feeds on coarser fabrics, tapestries, | 
carpets, and upholestered goods. 

Take equal parts of oil of camphor and spirits of turpentine. 
Soak blotting paper-in the mixture. Let the paper dry, then lay 
among furs or clothing. i ; 

ii / : 

Clothes moth is most destructive in summer, when woolen 
goods are stored away. 

“Us 

Clothes should be hung out and sunned good and brushed 
and beaten thoroughly, then packed in a cedar chest or with 
cedar chips. Clothes should be wrapped ‘in tar, paper, or bags to 
keep the female from laying her eggs on them. 

II. 
Benzine and naptha used as a spray is also good. 
IV. 

Upholstered furniture and rugs should be sprayed with 
gasoline twice a year. 

v. 

Naphtheline or moth balls will aid considerable in keeping 
these moths in control. : 


CARPET BEETLE OR BUFFALO MOTH. 
(Anthrenus scophulariae Linn) 


The adult insect is small, measuring about 4 of an inch in 
‘length. ‘This beetle is of European origin. ‘They breed especially 
on Spiraea and it is supposed they are carried into the house on 
the blossoms of the Spiraea and kindred flowers. The eggs of the 
adult female hatch out in a few days and commence feeding im- 
mediately. They show a preference for woolen goods, furs and 
feathers, especially-places where they are stored, as they are not 


. 


it oes 


li i i i a i iS ae 


-% 


HOUSEHOLD INSECTS AND THEIR REMEDIES 121 


so likely to be disturbed. They also live in the cracks of floors and 
feed on the underside of rugs and carpets. This is very destructive. 
They usually mature three broods yearly, according to the length 
of the summer. - 
I. 
Spray carpet with gasoline and wash all cracks with hot suds 
and follow by gasoline. 
Z Ii. 
Benzine and gasoline. 
ee Ill. 
Tar paper on floors will keep them away. 
: IV. 
Iron the carpet a part as a time with a wet cloth. This will 
kill them. 
Vv. 
Mothballs are good to pack with winter clothing. 
VI. 
Sulphur dioxide generated by burning flowers of sulphur is 
used, but it blackens silver and changes tints in wall paper, also 
ruins the colors in woolens. 


SILVER Fish MOTH. 
: (Lepisma sp.) 

This insect is of a silvery-gray, wingless and if touched will 
leave tiny scales on the fingers. ‘These insects are about 3 inch 
long, with two long feelers or antennae protruding from the head, 
while there is three feelers at the hind end of the body. ‘The pest 
prefers darkness, and is often found among undisturbed books, 
papers, or starched linens, as it exists on starchy products. As 
soon as these insects are disturbed, they may be seen scurrying 
away to hiding places. 

I. 

Pyrethrin dusted into places where it hides with kill them. 

Il. : 

The frequent handling of articles liable to be attacked is one 
of the best preventives. 

II. 

Naphthaline scattered among books and materials containing 
starchy mixtures is an excellent remedy. 


> i ‘aa See 


> ‘ . ’ 


122 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 

i IV. 

Gasoline is also used very successfully, but should be used 
with caution where there are stoves and lights, for when used ‘in 
large quantities it may cause an explosion or fire. 


Book LIcE. 
(Atropos sp. and Clothilla sp.) 


This insect is always found among old books, papers, starchy 
materials, and have been known to infest old mattresses. They 
heve a peculiar ticking noise, which they make. They are so 
small in size, one can hardly see them, and does not really belong 
to the true lice in size and their foods are mainly starchy foods, 
while the true lice are sucking insects. The antennae is very long 
on these pests. 

LE 

The use of naphthalene in boxes and trunks will aid greatly 
in keeping these pests away. ; 

ae 

Infested mattresses stuited with straw or corn husks should 
be ripped up and the contents burned. If the mattress is made 
of hair, if would pay to have it steam cleaned, thus all insects 
would be killed. 

Ill. 

All cracks and crevices, which are not easily reached by 

ordinary cleaning, should have a generous application of gasoline. 


THE BEDBUG. 
(Cimex lecturius) : 

The bedbug is an ancient and cosmopolitan insect. The 
presence of the bedbug in a house is not necessarily an indication 
of neglect and carelessness on the part of the housewife. This 
insect may. gain access in spite of the best care and the adoption 
of all reasonable precaution. They can be carried from place to 
place in trunks and suit cases by travelers. This insect may migrate 
from one house to another. They bite during the sleep of their 
victim and under cover of darkness, hiding during daylight in 
cracks of old fashioned wooden bedsteads, ‘under loose places in the 
wall paper, in crevices behind picture moulding, in picture frames, 
about door or window casings, or base boards. Every housewife 
is alarmed when she discovers the pest in her home and is always . 


~ 


HOUSEHOLD INSECTS AND THEIR REMEDIES 123 


eager to obtain an effective remedy for the extermination of the 
bedbug. é a ; 
i 

Crude carbolic acid has been found to be one of the most 
effective means of destroying bedbugs. ‘This is inexpensive and 
the fumes are very penetrating. The liquid should be applied 
with a small brush or feather in all crevices. Walls that are badly 
infested should be sprayed with equal parts of crude carbolic acid 
and kerosene. 

Il. 

Kerosene and gasoline will aid in eradicating these nocturnal 

pests, but can not always be relied upon. 
III. 

Take everything out of the infected room, plug up all the 
windows tightly, close all chimneys and empty 1 oz of powdered 
sulphur on a pan of hot coals, placed in the middle of the floor. 
hut the doors and cover all cracks; let the sulphur burn as long 
as it will. After the sulphur has burned out, paint all the cracks 
in the floor and around the base board with a strong solution of 
corrosive sublimate and treat the furniture to the same before 
replaeing it. Corrosive sublimate is deadly poison and should be 
kept out of reach of children. 

IV. 

When they make a lodgement in the wall, fill all the apertures 
with a mixture of soft soap and Scotch snuff. Take the bedstead 
4 to pieces and treat that in the same way. 

7 * yates 

4 Mix 2 oz. of camphor 
4 0z. spirits of turpentine 
I oz. corrosive sublimate 
1 pt. alcohol 

This should be applied with a brush or a spring- pottani oil 
can to all cracks and crevices. This is a deadly poison. 


FLEAS. 
(Pulex serraticeps Gerv.) 


Ee Le Oe ee ene ae. eae 3) 


The fleas that are usually found in houses ar2 the common 
cat and dog fleas. ‘The adults are wingless. The hind legs are 
strongly developed to enable them to jump great distances. The 


124 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


female lays her eggs loosly in the hair of the cat and dog, and are 
scattered wherever the animal goes. These eggs hatch out in a 
few days as larvae. In appearance, they resemble the maggots of 
the house fly, but are very much smaller. These larvae are full 
grown in two weeks, when they begin spinning a cocoon about 
themselves lying in a dormant state from 7 to 12 days, when they 
come out as an adult flea. 


J 


The quarters of the cat and dog should be thoroughly cleanea 
and disinfected so the fleas will not have a chance to lay their eggs. 
Sometimes they multiply so rapidly, not. having anything animal 
to feed upon, that they attack people, showing a preference for the 
lower limbs. The bite of the flea is very annoying to most people. 

i. 


Fleas will not breed in places where they are likely to be 
disturbed, so the shaking of rugs, carpets and thorough sweeping of 
floors will aid greatly in keeping them from breeding in the houses. 


Ill. 
Gasoline injected in cracks, crevices and places where they 
cannot be disturbed by any other means, will kill the larvae. 


IV. 

Creoline Dip sprayed in the cracks and corners of the kennel 
and on the dog will exterminate them. This should be done every 
two weeks. 

Wie 

Fresh pyrethrim powder dusted over carpets, rugs and sofas 
will afford relief. This powder should be left several days before 
sweeping it up. 

VI. 

Insect powder dusted throughly into the animal’s hair -will 
cause the fleas to drop oif. 

VII. 

Dogs should be given a lathery path of warm water and 
carbolic soap. 

VIII. 

Flower of sulphur contains sulphurous acid and is fatal to 
this pest, but care must be taken not to use it near colored flannels 
as it often destroys the color. ‘ 


HOUSEHOLD INSECTS AND THEIR REMEDIES 125 


HEAD LIck. 
(Pediculus capitis De G.) 


This is the most common insect that attacks man. It receives 
its name from being found on the head, although it sometimes 
is found on the hairs of the beard. It is parasitic in habits, and 
belongs to the same order as the bedbug. They puncture the 
scalp cnd suck the blood. The nits or eggs adhere very closely to 
the hairs end are found some distance from the scalp. These eggs 
hatch in two weeks and are very prolific. - 

i: 

The louse may be combed out of the hair with a fine comb. 


‘Kerosene put on the roots of the hair will kill all nits and the 


adult louse. 
ae 
Mercurial ointment is very effective. 
III. 
Vaseline is another that checks this pest by clogging up the 
breathing pores. Whatever remedy is used, should be kept up 
every two or three days for at least twenty-one days. 


TERMITES. 
(Termes aavipes Koll.) 


Termites, or white ants, as they are sometimes called, are not 
really a true ant. They have nests and live together similar to 
the ants but live on decayed wood and vegetable matter. The 
workers are white, blind, wingless, sexually undeveloped insects. 
The winged males and females are produced each spring but their 
wings are not strongly developed, so they are poor flyers. They 
usually nest in a hollow stump or other infested material. The 
winged males and females are blackish in color and resemble the 
true ants, except the crossviens in the wings. They reproduce 
yearly in the spring. 

i 

If this pest infests a building, the surest way is to tear off the 
pieces that are infested as they bury themselves in the wood and 
cannot easily be reached by fumigating. 

ori 
Wood soaked in creosote is-excellent in keeping them away. 


126 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


“II. 
The greatest difficulty is finding the nest as they tunnel all 
through the wood, but fumigating with carbon bisulphide is 
good if one can reach the seat of trouble. 


oe a 
Gasoline poured into the burrow will destroy them. 


BACON OR HAM BEETLE. 
(Dermestes lardaris Linn) 


This insect is about 3-16 in. long and % in. broad. ‘The lower 
half of the wing covers are covered with grayish-yellow scales, with | 
several small black spots on the wings, which sometimes form 
almost an entire band across the beetle. This insect is always 
recognized by its feeding on bacon, ham, lard and cheese. It 
especially like the fatty portions of the ham. ‘he adult female 
beetle begins laying her eggs in the spring on meats or nearby, so 
that the newly hatched larvae may crawl to the meat. The full 
grown larva are about 9-16 in. long. When full grown, they bury 
themselves in meat and cheese, and change to the pupa stage. 
They stay in this state from 3 to 5 days, according to conditions. 
These beetles reproduce about every six weeks.' 


I. 


If these beetles are found in the meat, the best remedy is to 


cut away the infested parts and wash in a weak solution of carbolic 
acid and water, or the good parts may be sliced and fried, lay the 
pieces in a stone jar and pour over hot lard and cover.. 


II. 
Some find spraying with benzine to be very eifective method 
for destroying the larvae. 
Il. 
Fumigating smokehouses and storerooms with carbon bisul- 
phide or hydrocyanic acid gas will rid the building of this pest 
Hydrocyanic acid gas is very dangerous so great care should be 
taken in handling it. 
IV. 
The smokehouse should be screened in order to keep it insect 
proof. The mesh should be fifteen to the inch. 


¥. 
2 


OE Ee Pa eS ee gerne ee oe a ee ee 


SE IES SAG ee CR 


EOUSEHOLD INSECTS AND THEIR REMEDIES ry 


° BEAN WEEVIL. 
(Acanthoscelides Bruchus obtectus Say) 


Dried beans that have been stored away for the winter supply 
are the ones most aifected. Many of the beans showing round 


_-holes are where the adult weevils have matured, some may contein 


small grubs, while in the lower part of box and in corners will be 
found these small weevils, about 1 inch in length. They ere of a 
brownish, spotted color. New beans may be infected from a few 
old beans. of last year’s crop, or by the eggs being deposited in the 


_ beans while on the vine. 


Fumigation with carbon bisulphide or carbon tetrachloride 


is the best treatment and should be applied as soon as beans are 


gathered. Never plant infested beans. 
The references below were consulted in preparation of this work. 


LITERATURE. ~ 


Andrew Boss. Meats on the Farm. Farmers Bul. No. 183, U. S. 
Dept. of Agri. 

Dr. L. O. Howard. Some facts about Malaria. Bul. No. 450. U.S. 
Dept. of Agri. 

Dr. L. O. Howard. House Flies. Farmers Bu. No. 459, U. S. Dept. 
of Agri. : 

Dr. L. O. Howard. Remedies and Preventives against Mosquitoes, 
Farmers Bul. No. 444, U. S. Dept. of Agri. . 
Dr. L. O. Howard. Household Insects. Bul. No. 4, U. S. Dept. of Agri. 
-' O.F. Hunziker. The Fly and its Relation to Economic Milk Production 
‘Cir. No. 43. Purdue-University, Purdue, Ind. = 

E. C. Levy. The Extermination of Mosquitoes. Health Dept. Rich- 
mond, Va. : 

C. L.-Marlett. The True Clothes Moths, Cir. No. 36. U.S. Dept. of 
Agri. : 
’ C.L. Marlett. Coackroaches. Cir. No. 51. U.S. Dept. of Agri. 

-C. L. Marlett. The Bedbug. Cir. No. 47, U.S. Dept. of Agri. 

H. J. Quale. Mosquito Control. Calif. Agri. Expt. Bul. No. 178. 

R. D. Whitmarsh. Insect Pest of the Household. Ohio Expt. Station 
Bul. No. 253. 


BOOKS. 


Lord Avebury. Ants, Be2es and Wasps.- 

Kellogg. American Insects. 

Comstock. Insects. 

Sanderson. Insect Pests of Farm, Garden and Orchard. 
Hodge. Nature Study and Life. i 
W.C€. O. Kané Injurious Insects. 
L. H. Bailey. Farm and Garden Rule Book. 


128 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Nai Life: With Special Reference to Entomostraca. . 


BY JOSEPH STACK. | 
Z 


The present paper is the result of a zoological survey of 
Beimiller’s Cove, Cedar Point, Ohio, and of numerous ponds and~ 
streams in that vicinity, nearly all the work being done on inverte- 
brate forms. The chief problem was on the habitat of Entomo- 
straca and the environic conditions a‘fecting them. The forms 
most abundant in the cove, and most often observed, belong to the 
two sub-classes Phyllopoda and Copepoda. ‘The nauplius stage 
was considered by itself at all times. 

During the summer, several trips were taken to neighboring 
bodies of water and the data gathered on these trips is included 
in this survey. 

Cedar Point is a peninsula, not over one mile wide at its widest 
point, extending eastward for seven miles into Lake Erie from the 
north-central part of Ohio, separating Sandusky Bay on the south 
from Lake Erie on the north. Cedar Point proper is located at 
the end of this peninsula and Ohio State University Laboratory 
is located two miles east of Cedar Point on Beimiller’s Cove, at 
which place most of this survey was made. 

Beimiller’s. Cove is situated in an ideal place for studying 
aquatic life. It is separated from Lake Erie on the north by 
Cedar Point, which is one quarter of a mile wide at this place. On 
the south it is separated from Sandusky Bay by a narrow peninsula 
about one half mile long which is an extension from the Point 
proper. The west portion of the Cove cuts into the Point ending 
in a marsh. ‘The Cove opens into Sandusky Bay on the south- 
east side. With such aquatic surroundings the opportunity for a 
comparative study is unlimited, a point that will be considered 
in the survey. ” 

To obtain more accurate data on the habitat and enyironic 
conditions affecting the Entomostraca in Beimiller’s Cove, stations 
were established where diferent environmental conditions prevailed 
and these places were subjected to careful study. These stations 
were visited every day and the day following the visits was spent 
in the laboratory identifying and determining the specimens 
collected. On account of the large area of the Cove it required a 
whole day to make the complete trip to all the stations. 


; 
j 
P 


opel 


~ 
+ 


a 


ae 


* 


ee GR Fae A 


“- 


“ AQUATIC LIFE 129 


Station I is located in the extreme north-west corner of the 
Cove and marked by a long pole driven solidly into the bottom 
at this place. The water is very shallow, 134 feet deep. The 
bottom is covered with decomposed plant life, consisting chiefly 
of water lily pads and bulrushes. Owing to the shallowness the 
temperature of the water varies directly with atmospheric changes. 
As in all shallow water, the temperature remains constant or 
usually tends to constancy throughout the slight depth according 
to the changes of air temperature. The shore at this point is 
covered with ferns and short grasses forming a swampy under- 
growth. Owing to this form of vegetation there is little protection 
from the sun. 

Station II is similarly situated near the shore which is swampy 
and spafsely protected by shade. ‘The water is slightly deeper 
than at Station I, being 224 feet deep. Other characteristics are 
similar to Station I. A large water-soaked log extending from 
the swamp makes a very stable land mark for this station. 

Station III is one of the most interesting points studied, being 
located in the mouth of a sewer channel which carries all the 
sewage from Cedar Point and empties part of it into the Cove. 
The remainder is carried, by a deepening of the channel to 4 feet, 
into Sandusky Bay. Station III is located in the extreme south- 
west corner of the Cove at the entrance of the sewer channel into 
the Cove. At this point the water is 3 1-6 feet deep and is extremely 
turbid, caused by sewage. There is a decided current produced 
here and continues to the Bay owing to the fact that the channel is 
several feet deeper than the surrounding water of the Cove. Due 
to this and to the great force that propels the sewage into the 
channel, the current is very strong and vegetation is not given a 
chance to grow as it does in the quiet water of the rest of the Cove. 
This current produces a fluctuation of forms and numbers at this 


‘station. The bottom is covered with a deep black slime. The 


water is protected from the sun by shrubs and small trees extending 
from the bank of the peninsula on the south. 

Station IV is midway between Station III and the end of the 
Cove on the south side, being too far from the sewer channel to be 
noticeably aifected by it. The bank slopes gently to a height of 
about 5 feet on the top of which there is a slight second-growth of 
trees which furnish considerable shade for this station. The bottom 
is rather sandy and free from abundant vegetation and is gradually 


130 TEE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


sloping in toward the center of Cove. Depth is 2 feet; marked by 
tree on peninsula. 

Station V is one of the deepest parts of the Cove, 5% feet 
deep. “The bottom is covered with a deep, soft layer of sandy loam 
on which grows an abundance of vegetation, chiefly Myriophyllum _ 
and Ceratopyllum which grows so rapidly that by August 25th it 
is impossible to row a small boat through the Cove. These forms 
first start submerged and later cover the entire surface. This 
station being located in the center of the Cove is noticeably aected 
by wind and currents. If early summer, before the vegetation 
has become too abundant, the water is clear. 

Station VI is south-east of Station I on the same side of Cove. 
The bottom is covered with decomposed plants making a mucky 
covering over sand. Underbrush covers the shore, back of which 
is a small wood which furnishes shade to the shore at this station. 
It is 1% feet deep; marked by dead tree on bank. 

Station VII is located about 10 feet south of -Laboratory 

Point in a swampy region, the water being 134 feet deep. The | 
bottom is composed of sand covered with muck. ‘The shade is 
sparse. c 
: Station VIII is midway between Laboratory Point and the 
end of the peninsula on the south, at the opening of the Cove into 
Sandusky Bay. ‘This is the deepest*part of the Cove, 6% feet. 
There is abundant vegetation as at Station V: The bottom is 
mucky and the wave action quite pronounced. No shade. 

Station IX is near the shore, at the extreme east end of the 
narrow peninsula on the south. The water is shallow at this point 
being only 1 1-6 feet deep. The bottom is sand covered with scant 
vegetation. ‘The peninsula ends at this point as a sand bar. 

All observations and collecting was done by the aid of a hig, 
heavy, flat bottomed row boat which was 12 feet long and 3 feet 
wide, having very low sides. It had to be quite large in order to 
carry the necessary equipment, to give ample room for taking the 
readings, and for preparing collected material for safe transportation 
to the laboratory. The heavier the boat the less chance for drifting 
from the point of operation. Having a flat kottom there was very 
little chance of rocking and it presented a plain surface on which 
could be placed bottles, jars, etc. Having low sides, 5 inches above 
the water surface, it facilitated the work of handling the nets, taking 
temperature readings and making observations along the bottom. 


AQUATIC LIFE i 


‘The carbon dioxide content of the water was determined by 
titration. On the seat in the stern of the boat was carried a case 
which contained all the requisites for making the analysis of 
carbon dioxide content. It contained a small bottle of indicator 
to which was attached a tube with a spring clamp which kept the 
bottle air tight and facilitated the using of the indicator. .Another 
bottle similarly equipped contained sodium hydroxide. A test 
bottle was lowered to the bottom of the Cove by means of a long, 
stout cord. ‘To the neck of this bottle a weight, heavy enough to 
submerge it, was attached. To the cork was fastened a stout cord 
by means of which the water-tight bottle could be opened after it 
had reached the desired depth. ‘The carbon dioxide content was 
taken as follows: the test bottle was made as free from air as our 
means would permit and the stringed-cork tightly inserted. The 
bottle with weight and cord attached was lowered into the water 
to the desired depth and the stringed-cork was pulled allowing the 
water to enter until the bottle was completely filled. Then it was 
drawn gradually to the surface and corked to keep the air from 
entering. Before the titration was made the top portion was 
quickly poured off to obtain more accurate results and 1000 ¢. ¢. 
taken from the remainder. ‘To this a few drops of indicator was 
added drop by drop and the number of c. c. required to color the 
solution a delicate pink determined the amount of carbon dioxide 
present in rooo c. c. of water. On a following page the results are 
given. These readings were made only on two trips owing to the. 
amount of time it required to make them and to the fact that the 
presence of the carbon _dioxide was practically constant for the 
length of time we were working on this problem. 

All temperatures were taken by means of an accurately 
adjusted and tested deep sea thermometer. Four readings. were 
taken at the nine stations every trip; air and water temperature 
at the surface, water temperature one half distance to the bottom, 
and on the bottom. 

The turbidity was taken by the use of a very simply constructed 
turbidimiter made of a Mason jar cover in the top of which was 
the customary porcelain disc. To the sides to this cover were 
attached three strings which were tied at a point 4 inches above 
the cover. This method of attachment kept the white porcelain 
disc parallel to the surface. From the three strings extended a 
long. extension which was used.for lowering. the cover, from the 


132 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


boat. The turbidimiter was lowered in a horizontal position and , 
the depth at which it entirely disappeared from view was noted. 
It was then slowly raised again and the depth at which it reappear- 
ed noted. The mean of these two measurements was taken as 
the depth of its visibility beneath the surface. This turbidimiter 
was used at each station. 

For collecting purposes towing nets, made of fine silk bolting- 
cloth were used. These nets were 18 inches long and conical, the 
base or entrance being 8 inches in diameter and held open by a 
wooden hoop. ‘Three cords were attached by the same method 
used on the turbidimiter. The apex or outlet of the net was % inch 
in diameter and to this end was tied a small vial 2 inches long and 
¥% inch in diameter. On the neck of each vial there was a flange 
which facilitated the tying on of the net. Fifteen of these collecting 
vials were used on each trip and were carried in a box specially made 
for them. New corks were always used and at each station the date, 
number of towing, and a letter representing the kind of towing was 
written with water proof ink on each cork which was then inserted 
into a corresponding vial. See chart number ‘1 for method of 
_ keeping this data. 

Field notes were kept in a water-proof covered notebook and 
the form on the following page was used in recording observations 
at each station. 


Date 2.42: LOLGeahimMeLol days a Air temperature... 
Wind: sDitection= 2s. Vieloeitiy2cce os Water Temperature: Surface 
ete Be 4% distance to bottoms: 2. “Bettomi. 2. 2) Sky 2 ae hee 
biditys Carbon dioxide... per 1000c.c. Bottom condition... 


The followirg terms were used for description ct: 


Wind. Sky. 
Not perceptible.._........N. P. Clean a eee Chk 
Gall nacre ee, 5 es ae eras C: HaZy spt eae tee 18 
Moderates: Seen. teh M. Cloudyi-2 3S ae Cat 
Light Breeze... iB: PO gpa eee eee F. 
strong Breeze... Sel ois 
Plant Life Character of Botiom. 

Aibiinida nie is See A. Sandi othe. or Se ee Sn. 
ASF oes ie Se S: Mitek ye yo) 0 tee eae My. 
A Dsents.2$2 ea eae Abs. Clave Te Sy. en Cly. 


On each trip it was necessary for one man to row the boat and 
keep notes while the other made the ol servations. To avoid 


43 5 
on 


LDR DE ne ATR OE yO EEE: 


ee, 


; AQUATIC LIFE 133 


variations in the readings the same man made all the observations 
while the other rowed the boat. . 
We usually started out at 9:30 a. m., and at each station the 


following procedure was carried out. On arriving at the statioa 


a heavy anchor was dropped to the bottom to hold the boat at a 
fixed point. Then the form for keeping the data, previously 
described, was filled out. The towings were made as follows: first 
the tow net with vial attached was weighted and buoyed sufficiently 
to emerse the net and vial to the desired depth. This was attached 
to a rope 100 feet long. The boat was then rowed 100 feet and then 
anchored and the net with vial was gently pulled to the boat. 
This gave us sample No. 1, horizontal towing at the surface. The 
cork was marked accordingly and inserted into the vial. A note of 
vial was made in record book. Owing to the shallow water at some 
of the stations only the one towing was taken but at other stations 
where the depth of the water was greater, the surface, one half the 
distance to the bottom and bottom towings were taken and marked 
accordingly. The complete trip was generally finished at 3.00 p. m., 
and the material brought to the laboratory for preserving. Four 
drops of formaldehyde and two or three of glycerine to each vial 
served as best preservative. The vials were placed on a special, 
private table and were not molested. The examination of material 
was made next day. 
FIELD NOTES 


CHART I 
Date....6-29-16. Time...9:32 A. M. Sky-....Hazy. 
Station No. I II TA ravi VE OEE Vili os 
Ceniohenp> at ourlace.. 2725 927-5 20.- 1 2055-= 2026 2E.5¢ 2. 27 ees 
% Dist. to Bottom BIND. oe 2 Onn DO a2 Osy LOU Lone Le Ts ea 
~ Bottom 27 RA eT IONE Bie er DOr SD we NP Oat, a2 Oui Die. 
Depth WOM ONS eB ee et he MMe sie Ga igen is aes tage 
Time A. Ml. 9:45°10:00 TO-20:1Q:40 pik? 1.2) ST 5 = Seg 123 
Wind Direction N.W. S.W. S.W. S.W. S.W. S.W.S.E. S.E.. S.E. 
Wind Velocity 1p Saad Ua) Seed Uo ot Dol S eens Uo) SG) Wiel Bl Oo os aR SY a) Bipot wl 25 
Turbidity TO 2 See Sie a le se SOLE Cohen es A CG 
Air Temperature 27 27 27 a7 26 BOs 2 AGE 2s 
CO, Cont. No.c.c. perM. 3 fo) 20.2 TOM TO fe) 7 2 
Vial No. Location 
I Horizontal Towing from station I. 
II Horizontal Towing from station II. 
Ill Horizontal Towing from station III. 
IVa Horizontal Towing at surface from station IV. 


IVb Horizontal Towing 4 D. to B. from station IV. 


134 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 
IVe Horizontal Towing at bottom from station IV. 
‘ Va Horizontal Towing at surface from station V. 
Vb Horizontal Towing % D. to B. from station V. 
Ve Horizontal Towing at bottom from station V. 
Via Horizontal Towing at surface from station VI. 
VIb Horizontal Towing % D. to B. from station VI. 
Vic Horizontal Towing at bottom from station VI. 4 


Vila Horizontal Towing at surface from station VII. 

VIIb Horizontal Towing 4 D. to B. from station VII. 

Vilc Horizontal Towing at bottom from station VII. y 
Villa Horizontal Towing at surface from station VIII. 

VIIIb Horizontal Towing % D. to B. from station VIII. 

VIlIc Horizontal Towing at bottom from station VIII. 


IXa Horizontal Towing at surface from station IX. 
IXb Horizontal Towing 14 D. to B. from station IX. 7} 
IXc Horizontal Towing at bottom from station IX. 


A qualitative and quantitative microscopical analysis was 
made of the contents of each vial. Three slides were made from 
each sample and the kinds and quantity of forms noted. The 
average number of each form on three slides was recorded as on 
Chart i- 


6-29-16 CHART II - 
eee. : a8 @ 22 -e28 a8 8 32 223 . 
pa gS : as £ ga ae OF § 53 5s 2 : 

ee eS Sparse. isos Sparse = fe) I 62492: = 33 34 eee eee : 
| 6 Cole ceed SPALSCxe wen oe Sparse.2=. =. eK 23... OSS 5-2 oOo ee 
ELE abundant. ___. absent.22-:200< O:.45"22 Ol 0. 210s AO Ome d 
IMac Le abundant... _____. absent 2 SSO TO A == OAS = (Oars eee 
| EY. OW ict abundant. 2-3: PErESent == = 12 Son Dis 3 2 EAL TQ: Oe eee 
IVe Sparse. present ie: 3645 6628-097... Os alee eee 
Wa wt 29 PA RSG. elk tes. Presents ses 5A Le Oe One Bee OO as 
Vb. ee Sparse. Ca abundant’ 20%. -.O22>- 7.24) 3 fi Te Oe eee 
Viele sparsess <2 eek abtindant.2:14 0-83-01. 2S Fo Oe 
Vilas ==: Sparse... 2). s2nabundant) 24 teed 8a 4 Ons Aen eo eee eee 7 
Wal bee 5 abundant.2 “abundant: =.9%s- y= ee 12° a AO 67 See 
NWilGs= SAS parses 2) a0 oss sparse. 18h Ol Ja ES OES 4a On Se Oe 
NOME eS parses ac reas Sparse< 3 Oz... 8h IOLA Ae 2 Oe 
VIiIb sparse. SS Sparse=a se Dik Gin (Gt ss VEE 0 QUES SG aM aera Innes eo ae 
VIilc absent. =a abundant.___ Bei Qe I Be Oe IO Oe ee 
Walitates ea senteet com abtindant =O: VOnen Se. BO: Ge eee 
VilTb.:-absent. 23 8 Spars@se5 EOL .Ont Are A Th a ey Oe ae 
Vikile: “Uusparsess. 2 Dresents 9) Bo Oe AS, 76s 15. ee ea ae 
Xa ee aDSen>22 pees Sparse tee ON OL DO AS Ee, De Os See ee ee 
Lx biae absent! ns Spars@se 2 go 6.2 7s Om ator Ones eae 
TC oe absent...._.......: absent........ 12.2152." 0.7 34 Pe tel eee One 


AQUATIC LIFE 135 


Chart I represents the data taken on the following days in 
1916. June 22, 23,29. July 7, 13, 21, 24, 26,28. August 2,-4, 8,16, 
22. On each trip a similar chart was used and at the end of the 
summer the average temperature, turbidity and carbon dioxide 
content was calculated. Chart I shows the average at each 
station. ‘Thus fourteen charts similar to I and II were made, 
denoting fourteen trips to each station and from the data taken at 
each station the following conclusions were drawn. 

Stations I and II. Very shallow; temperature variable; 
bottom covered with decomposed plant life. The Entomostraca 
which feed on plants, desmids, diatoms, etc., were quite abundant. 
The greater the rainfall the more abundant the Entomostraca at 
all of the stations. 3 c. c. of carbon dioxide per 1000. No eitect on 
forms found at such a low per cent. 

Station III. Comparatively deep. Carbon dioxide content 
high, 20 c. c. per 1000. Bacterial growth abundant. Numerous 
Entomostraca in nauplius stage. Adults found more numerous at 
Station IV where vegetation was more plentiful. The number and 
genera fluctuated from day to ped due to the current from the 
sewer channel. 

Station V. This station was one of the deepest in the Cove 
and although fewer forms were found here their number and kind 
were more constant. It was found by taking three horizontal 
towings that the Entomostraca tend to be uniformly distributed 
in a horizontal plane having the maximum number about 2 feet 
below the surface and the minimum at the bottom. The nauplius 
stage appeared first in the upper waters of the Cove quite near the 
surface. Increase in population results in extension downward, 
and the mass becomes most uniformly distributed at its maximum 
developement. With decline of production there is a relative 
increase in numbers in the lower waters. Common sunfish (Eupo- 
motis gibbosus) were feeding on the surface forms. 

Station VI. Located near shore having similar surroundings 
and environment that existed at Stations I and II. ‘The forms 
frequently found here were Daphnia, Simocephalus, Chydorus. 
Sunfish had built their nests at this point and fed upon these forms. 
It is estimated that one Daphnia pulex (female) may have a progeny 
of 13,000,000,000 in sixty days. It is little wonder then that the 
Entomostraca form one of the chief foods for fishes. It was also 
noted that when large numbers of Daphnia occurred and a cloud 


136 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


would shade the rays of the sun these forms would come nearer to 
the surface and with the passing of the cloud the forms would 
descend. 

At Stations VII, VIII, and IX, which were at the outlet of 
the Cove all the forms fluctuated owing to the wind currents 
producing waves. Especially was this true when the wind came 
from the south or the southeast. On calm days the greater numbers 
were found near the surface while on windy days they were entirely 
absent or only a few near the bottom. Very seldom was the nauplius 
stage found at this.station. 

- At Stations I, II, VII, and IX, the water was shallow and the 
temperature remained constant or would tend to constancy through- 
out the slight depth, depending upon atmospheric changes. At 
these stations the forms were found to be numerous on warm, 
bright days but very few could be found on cool, dark days; at 
such times they were more numerous in deeper water where less 
fluctuations in temperature occurred. Greater fluctuations occurred » 
in the narrow Cove which was also shallower, than in Lake Erie 
or in the abandoned quarry pond to be described later, both of 
which were considerably deeper. 

This sums up only a very minute portion of such a vast problem 
and only a few conclusions have been drawn. In addition the* 
following data was collected on trips taken to neighboring bodies 
of water and also on some other observations made in Beimiller’s 
Cove. ; 

BLUE HOLE, CASTALIA. 

Blue: Hole is located at Castalia, Ohio, which is about six 
miles southwest from Sandusky, Ohio, close to the Big Four 
R. R. tracks. 

A party of four made observations and collected material 
from Blue Hole, July 3rd, 1916. We arrived at this place at 10:45 
a. m., the weather conditions being ideal. The sky was clear, the 
sun hot and the wind very perceptible. ; 

The Hole is 80 feet long, 64 wide and about 45 deep; having 
two small outlets about 3 feet wide, leading from either side. It is 
surrounded by a narrow path about 2 feet wide and surrounding 
this there is thick vegetation, 6 inches to 3 feet high., Extending 
from the bank, out about 2 feet on the top of the water there is a ; 
shelf of plant life made up of moss, chara, algae, spirogyrae, and 
other forms intermingling. 


at aes 


SEE ea MEN SEERA Gh REE IIS OS Ce eee 


ae 
a 


AQUATIC LIFE 137 


On this particular day we found the water to be exceedingly 
clear and blue. This blue color is probably due to the blue-green 
algae and great amount of sulphur present. The Hole is fed by 
springs which, on some days, bubble up to the surface. The water 
is ice cold and very odorous of sulphur. Workmen, who get 
drinking water there, say that when the springs are bubbling it is 
impossible to see the bottom owing to the great agitation. The 
sides and bottom are composed of marl and only a slight growth 
of vegetation occurring on the sides near the top, was found. 

From the two streams leading from the Hole, numerous trout 
are caught every year but in the Hole itself animal life is. very 
sparse. We could see no fish but found one stickleback underneath 
the plant shelf. The keeper of the Castalia Fishing Club said that 


he had seen trout swim across Blue Hole with mouth out of water 


and then jump on to the land. From these facts we drew the 
conclusion that there is but very little free oxygen present. 

From the shelf which covered the water for about two feet 
from the shore towards the center, pieces’ of the shelf, 1 foot long 
by 6 inches wide, were taken from the Hole and examined. The 
first piece was taken from a point nearest the center of the Hole. 
It was made up of moss and algae. On the under surface there 


-were found numerous snail eggs Bit only afew adult forms. Located 


in the mat there were Gammarus and snails. Very few forms were 
found on the top of the mat. 

The second piece was taken from a point close to the shore 
and the odor from this piece was very strong of sulphur. Few 
forms were found on the surface and on the bottom but in the mat 
the following forms were found: numerous insect larvae, snail eggs, 
leeches and Gammarus; Asellus sparse, and only one earthworm. 

The third sample, taken from the mat next to the shore, was 
made up of chara. In this the Gammaridae and Asellae were 
abundant. Also found Simulium larvae. In a piece of Spirogyrae 
mat taken from a similar point numerous Annulates were found. 

A sample of moss taken from the Hole at the upper end had 
very little life on it, one earthworm being found. 

Sample number 5 was taken from near the shore and was made 
up of mint, moss and other plants and it was found to be sparsely 
inhabited; a few snails, leeches, and insect larvae. Three pieces 
of moss, the size of the hand, were taken next and examined and 
the following were found: 


138 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST ~ 


Ave *..7 Gammaridae. 
B.._..........13 Gammaridae. 
Cy eee 14 Gammaridae. ' 


From a piece of chara the same size: 


Ae # 3 ~Gammaridae. 
: a 4 Gammaridae. 
Coe aS 4 Gammaridae. 


The moss seemed to be the most desirable. The gray colored type 
which is the larger was found, as a rule, nearest the shore. These 
Gammaridae also live near the surface. Other forms found were 
earthworms, snails, Asellus (few) and Hydrophilous beetles (few). 
In the protected place along the shore a great many Physa were 
found on the algae. 

On another lump of moss the size of the hand we found 21 
‘leeches, 5 snails, 2 earthworms, 1 beetle, 10 Gammaridae. 

From the preceeding data we drew the following conclusions: 

1. Life searce, due to lack of oxygen. : 

- 2. Gammaridae most numerous of forms found, being most 

al undant near the surface and in the plant life along the shore. 

3. Algae and moss plentiful, furnishing abundant food for- 
plankton. ; 

Towings were taken at the surface (T'w. 1); (Tw. 2) %4 the 
distance to the bottom and in these the following forms were found: 


ihclygecies 
Diatoms (abundant). 
Spirogyrae (sparse). 
Blue-green algae (abundant). 
: ~  Roundworm (Nais 1). 


All smaller protozoans absent. A few Desmids found. 


Tapia 2 
Spirogyrae (sparse). 
Cy prices sensei 4. 
Annulates.___..._.. Bu 


Insect larvae......2. 


On August 3rd. we took the following readings, the carlLon 
dioxide content being taken about 10 feet below the surface: 


Reading Nowa. s 50c.c. per M. 
Reading No. 2._.........-- 6o0c. c. per M. 
Reading, No.3 -%:.2.22 60 c.c. per M. 


The depth of the water near the log on the west side is 32 feet. 
The depth in the depression on the east side is 29 feet. 


AQUATIC LIFE — TO, 


. The temperature at the lower outlet was 41.3 F. The tempera- 
ture around the shelf where the water is more stagnant than 
at the outlet was 60.8 degrees F. 


BEIMILLER’S COVE, CEDAR POINT. 
July 5, 1916. 

A strip of shore water 100 feet long and 30 feet wide along the 
northwest corner of the Cove was examined for aquatic forms. 
The temperature of the water was 27 degrees C., and this was 
constant throughout the slight depth of 2 to 3 feet. ; 

The flora found consisted of willows along the shore, Myrio- 
phyllum and Ceratophyllum just below the surface, roots of grasses 
and trees along the shore, and reeds throughout the space covered. 

On the surface of the water along the shore were found adult 
mayflies and midges while adult Lepidoptera were flying over the 
water. There was an abundance of vegetation near the shore and 
this accounts for the mucky bottom at the east end of the Cove. 
Leeches (Glossiphonia) were found to ke numerous and Asellus 
were abundant. 

In the mud and under the surfaces of leaves and in among the 
roots along the shore the Gammaridae were numerous. . Also found 
large egg masses of Polyzoa, pupae cases, Oniscus, leeches, and 
snail eggs. 

On the reeds which were all growing from a sandier bottom, 
leeches, water mites, snails, polyzoans and snail eggs were found. 
On all vegetation in this locality polyzoans were found in abundance. 
Gammaridae most numerous on myriophyllum and algae.. 

On the bottom along the northeast side of the Cove a few 
mussels (Lampsilis), numerous snails at a depth of 2% feet} and 
sunfish nests at 2 to 3 feet were found; also a few crayfish. 

The air temperature during the collecting period was 27 degrees 
C. and the water temperature 25 degrees. 


. 


SUNFISH NESTS—BEIMILLER’S COVE. 
July 5, 1916. 

The sunfish build their nests along the shore in shallow water 
. where the bottom is unusually sandy and free from vegetation. 
7 The nest consists of a saucer-like depression having the bottom 
lined with small pebbles. These pebbles may be the result of the 
4 fanning, described later on, or they may be the result of wave 
action. 


~ 140 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


In the process of building the nest the fish clear the desired 
location by swimming around and around the spot in a very 
methodical manner; swimming clockwise three or four times then 
erecting the body and using the tail as a fan or broom to clear away 
the vegetationand other foreignsubstances; then they swimcounter- 
clockwise for three or four times and go through the same process 
of sweeping. At regular intervals, usually after four complete 
cycles, they dart out to survey the surroundings for enemies, etc. 

They are gregarious in their nest building habits. We found 
anywhere from 6 to 14 in a colony in the Cove. . 

Marsu PoND—KELLEY’s ISLAND. 
July 8, 1916. 

Large marsh pond located about 75 yards from Lake Erie. 
Great abundance of vegetation consisting of algae and spirogyrae. 
‘The bottom was covered with a deep mud. The following forms 
were found: beetles, water striders, snails, few Gammaridae and 


tree toads. _ Back swimming beetles, Hydrophylidae, Dytiscidae; 


numerous crayfish, minnows, frogs amid the vegetation, leeches 
and Rhyncophoridae. 

This marsh was formerly a celery bed but now epi moist and 
marshy by springs and seepage from the lake. 


Rock Bottom POND—KELLEY’S ISLAND.. 
July 8, 1916. 

The pond was originally a quarry and has been blasted out at 
least 14 years ago. It measured 100-feet wide and 120 feet long. 
Rocky bottomed and rock bound. Turbidity 9 inches. One corner 
was covered with grass and willow bushes. Abundant algae and 
spirogyrae around the edge. 2 

On the surface were found water striders, Gyrinidae, back 
swimmers, Notonectidae, midgepupae, diptera larvae, fish, turtles, 
toads, leeches and snails. Also found an Oligocheat (Lumbrziculus) 
close to the rocks in spirogyrae. 

In a surface towing taken from a poitit 10 feet from thé shore 
along the bottom the following forms were found: 

Cyclops........ 75. 
Cyprs=.—- 26. 
Numerous Ebipoda which resembled Paramecium only smaller. 
LAKE ERIE AND SANDUSKY Bay Farms. 
Fulys27, 1976. 
Com perison of plankton in Lake with that in Bay. 


. 4 ‘ J 
§ a ; 4 
ee eae see Nee yeaa Re n= (ese ed ie el eet 


AQUATIC LIFE Det eae: 


- 


No.1 Tw. in Bay. : No.2 Tw.in Bay. 


“1.  Ceratium (numerous). 1. Bosmina. 
2. Nauplius (numerous). 2. Nauplius (numerous). 
3. Cyclops. 3. Cypris skeleton. 
4. Annulata (Stylaria lacustria). 4. Ceratium (numerous). 
5. Rotifera. 5. Ro.ifera. 
6. Diatoms (Asterionella). 6. Peritricha (Podophrys). 
7. Arcella diseoidea. 7.  Diatoms. 

: 8. Bosmina (few). . ~ 8. Daphnia hyaline. 
9. Amoeba proteus. : g. Cypris. 
zs abe i 10. * Closterium. 
No. 1 Tw. in Lake. No. 2°‘Tw. in Lake. 

1, Monostyla. 1. Difflugia lobostoma. 
2. Ceratinm longicorne. 2. Ceratium. 
3. Difflugia lobostoma. 3. Diatom. 

4. Bosmina striata. 4. Algae. 
5. Nauplius. See CE ASit))- 
6. Diatoms (Asterionella). . 


I‘rom the preceeding comparison we find that the planktonts 
are more numerous in the Bay than in the Lake and in the Lake 
they are more numerous a distance out where the shore does not 
ailect the occurrence than they are near shore. For self preservation 
the planktonts avoid the battering action of the waves along the 
shore. 


PIPE CREEK, SANDUSKY. 
~ July 19, 1916. 

Pipe Creek is a typical rock-bottomed stream which begins 
in a marsh near the Bay and empties back into the marsh. The 
stream is about 15 feet across and a sewer empties into it at the 
bridge near the Soldiers’ Home, from where we started. The vege- 
tation consisted chiefly of algae which was directly in the stream. 
Also found live crayfish and many small minnows. as 

Vegetation covered with Eucrangonyx and beetles; damsel 
fly larvae were also quite abundant; small cat fish, dragon fly larvae, 
several snails, cat fish fry and the numerous skins of crayfish which 
had been shed. et 

Towing No. 1 was taken below the bridge along the shore. The 
current was moderate; depth about 8 inches; sewer contamination 
present. Air temperature 32 degree C. Water temperature 32 
degrees C. Found gammarzs, diatoms, and arcella. 

Towing No. 2 was taken froma quiet pool banked o% from the | 


‘ ~ 


142 THE AMERICAN MIDFAND NATURALIST 

main channel by rocks. Found cyclops, arcella, difflugia and 

diatoms. Life very sparse. .. 
Towing No. 3 was taken from a quiet pool in the creek below 

the cemetery, the spot being well shaded. Contamination from : 

all the sewers from the cemetery and below was present at this 

point. No vegetative forms were present. 


Annulata (Nats). 

Amoeba proteus. 

Diatoms (numerous). « 

Rotifera (Brachionus enizit) numerous. 

Paramecium. 

Arcella. 

Euglenoidea very abundant and this is indicative of sewage contam- 
ination; encysted forms abundant also. 


NAN PW NH 


More forms found here and the species were more numerous than 
at the points from which the two preceding towings were taken. 

Down about 150 feet the vegetation was chiefly of a chara-like 
plant. Rapids were located below the second point of collection. ~ 
In the rapids we found snails (numerous) larvae cases of midges, 
nematodes, beetles. 

From rock on bottom: plannaria, caddice fiy cases, bryozoan, 
snail eggs, fly larvae, egg case of water beetle, leech and hydra. 

Air temperature was 30 degree C. and that of the water was 35. 


LAKE ERIE PLANKTON. 
July 27, 1916. 
' Towing No. 1 at surface. 


3 Vorticella on blue-green algae (Anabaena Flos-aquae). 
2 Diatoms. 
Towing No.2. % distance to bottom—10 feet. 
12 Nauplius. 
2 Cyclops. 
1 Bosmina. 
18 Vorticella on Anabaena Flos-aquae. - 
Towing No. 3 taken from the botiom—2zo feet. 

4 Daphnia hyalina. 

65 Cyclops. 

20 Nauplius. 

There were few forms found at the surface, more numerous 
at the middle and bottom, greatest number at the bottom. The 
adult cyclops most numerous at the bottcm while the nauplius . 
stage was found to be most abundant 4 distance to the bottom. 


AQUATIC LIFE 143 


Vorticella seemed to be very fond of the blue-green algae, Anabaena 
flos-aquae. 


‘ SANDUSKY BAY PLANKTON. 
July 27, 1916. 
Towing No. 1 ai surface. _. Towing No. 2 ¥ distance to bottom. 

Cyclops. Ceratium. 

Nauplius. Cyclops. 

Ceratium (numerous). Diffiugia. 

Vorticella. Daphnia kalbergensis. 
Rotifera (numerous)./ | Nauplius. 


Great abundance of animal life throughout Bay. 


STARVE ISLAND. 
July 25, 1916: 

Starve Island is located about 20 miles from Cedar Point and 
about one mile from Put-in-Bay. The island is made up of about 34 
of an acre of limestone and only a slight amount of vegetation 
occurs on the northeast corner (Platell). 

This island is the nesting place of both the common and black 
tern and all ages of the birds were found. The youngest ones were 
found protecting themselves from the sun’s heat by keeping in the 
shade of rocks. This was also a striking example of protective 
coloration. Found one garter snake and this was the extent of life 
on the island. > 


ABANDONED QUARRY—MARBLEHEAD, OHIO. 
July 15, 1916. 

Abandoned quarry at Marblehead, three or four years old, a 
typical rock bottom pond. Observations and reading were taken 
at three stations. Breezy and very bright sunlight. 

Station 1. 

‘Located about 50 feet above dock near the center of the pond. 
Rocky bottom and only a slight trace of algae. Depth 7 feet, 4 inches. 


Temperature. 


Slmbacew 7s ferris 286: 
¥% dis..to bottom..27 C. 
Botton] as sae ES 
Carbon dioxide content. 
AIMS TinTaACe eee ze ot Ic. c. per M: 
Ad WObEOI Ses oer, ria Oe cg Se 


2 ft. below-surface._.5 c. c. “ 
7 ft. below surface____5 c. c. 
¥ ft. below surface....3¢. c. ‘ 


144 "THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST | 

No. 1 towing taken from the surface. 

No. 2 towing taken from the bottom. 

No. 3 sample was taken by pumping from the bottom into a— 
net which was tied at the narrow end or outlet of the pump and 
then the net wes carefully washed. 

No. 4 towing taken from the bottom. 

Station 2. : 

Located just of the dock. Depth 10 feet. Turbidity 9 feet. 


Temperature. “No. 5 deep towing off dock. 
28 C. at surface. No. 6 surface towing off dock. 
27 C. &% distance to bottom. No. 7 %-distance to bottom from 
27 C. at bottom. dock straight across to other side. : 
No carbon dioxide present at surface. No. 8 surface towing from side to side. Fi 


2c.c. per M. at bottom. 
1% c. c. per M. 7 feet below es. 
7 ¢. c. per M. 5 feet below surface. 


Station 3. 

At entrance of undercut from Lake through which undercut 
the pond is kept supplied with water. This point is supposed tole 
the deepest part of the pond but sounding proved that the pond was 
the same depth throughout. > 


PMepthest.s= ve: 7{t. 4in. ‘ 
Turbidity_.....7ft. 4in. 
; Temperature. — No. g-deep pond dredging. : 
28 C. at surface. Carbon dioxide. ; 5 
28 C€. &% distance to bottom. At surface... FC... perv. 
27 -C. at bottom. At-bottom.. 2... 5 c. c. per M. 


Sunfish were found in the pond and also one stickleback. These 
fish had been thrown into the pond by fishermen. In pools, cut of 
from the main part we found water beetles and water striders. 
In pools not quite cut of from the shallow pools we found an 
akundance of algae upon which there were numerous beetles 
(Hydrophyllidae) and many smallsnails. Given below is.a summary 
of the diTerent towings with forms, quantity and quality found in 
each towing. ; 


No. 1 Towing. * No. 4 Towing. 
Te DUS MUMS: og tee oe enter I 1. Ceratium longicorne......=....------ 24 ; 
MAD AALO MS ee I 2 IN OULU Sales, oo oo ee ee 3 
No. 2 Towing at bottom. 3 CY COPS Se As See Nees 5 
BOING wiles 2 Stee eee 3 4. BOSIMINDE 2751s paceine eee ere Il 
BIS HELIN ca chao are ae ae 2 5s DUPANta, aoc te ae OSD a? 4 


a 


OUR BIRDS IN NOVEMBER . 145 


‘ 


weg. Nematoda 5 2 BC Salone Pe Some I . No. 5 Towing. 


4. Ceratium licen Big teoe 672 Teen) OUD US= toseen Be 8. rar Neen aes Se eee I 
No. 3 Towing taken by pumping. 2 VROUDI CT sth tener See 2 
I Cypris egg Orde ede, ck 4 Sees EROS HO 0 Fc ee ea A 28 
EDT OLOWIES 2 a ooo eae oe a 5 PpINOME DIL GS= See ie 5 ok ete 4 
USILY | 2104 | eects ae eee I pS NCpOgS Sas) cba a, ats Re aed 5, 
4. Ceratium longicorne............-- 10 6. Ceratium longicorne______........80 
: Gs ipeaal DISSE EI ee aeRO ae SoS? ake IP 3 
No. 6 Towing. No. 7 Towing. 
BEN OS TUUIOR temo cep men Il DSEIN CU DILYS rte a Cie 10 
EVI OE RE UU Silos x Seta! GN ocd ecole » 9 OED OS NUMOS eho em Oe aet 14 
3. Ceratium longicorne.............- 68 3. Arce? s.35 .~ DARE nd ict oe. 8 
ae moptfera skelétowt. oo 32. By GO ANED PERE eh See Dy eae 2 
a No. 8 Towing. Beh OF COD NO. e e  ontean pene 7 
HOHOG) AUS ie eae eee ee I 6. Cera.tum longicorne....._...-.----- 563 
BSAA BINS FLT ea ee a I 
Nematoda I 


Our Birds in November. 


BY BROTHER ALPHONSUS, C. S. C. 

November is the. month when the last of the summer residents 
and spring migrants depart for their winter homes. Fox Sparrows, 
Titlarks and Myrtle Warbles, among the migrants, are the last to 
leave us. And among the summer residents, the Robin, Kingfisher, 
Bronzed Grackle, Killdeer, Vesper Sparrow, Golden-crowned 
Kinglet and Legger-head Shrike are the latest to depart. The 
species that are most frequently seen in November are the Song 
Sparrow, Goldfinch, Cardinal, Biue Jay, Crow, Downy Wood- 
pecker, Redheaded Woodpecker, White-breasted Nuthatch, Chick- 
adee, Snowbird, Purple Finch and Tree Sparrow. Those that are 
less frequently observed. are the Brown Creeper, — Diver, Prairie 
Horned Lark, and Mourning Dove. 


_ SONG SPARROW 
Melospiza melodia 
This favorite songster is quite hardy, and remains north in 
small numbers all winter. In November the bird may be heard 
calling near its summer haunts along the shores of lakes and streams; 
and occasionally on bright days, the cheery notes of its song will 
greet the bird-lover. Not infrequently the pedestrian will startle a 


146 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST. 


' » Song Sparrow near the edge ofa lake, when the bird will fly across 
the water. 


GOLDFINCH 
Astragalinus tristis 
In late autumn the Goldfinches gradually grow fewer and few- 
er in number, and finally no records will be made by the careful 
observer for days together. In the first part of the month these 
birds are found in small flocks, and may be readily known by the 
characteristic call-notes. By this time the Goldfinches have 
changed their bright summer plumage for the sober dress of 
winter. 
BLUE JAY eee 
Cyanocitta crestata . 


Hardly less striking in appearance than the Cardinal is the hand- ~ 


some Blue Jay. He gives the observer every opportunity to appre- 
ciate the beauty of his blue coat, for the bird often drops to the 
ground, or perches ina low tree or shrub. Here he almost deafens a 
person who may be close to him by his harsh call-note. The fine 
bell-like note of the Jay may be heard at any time of the year, but 
less often in autumn and winter. 


Downy WOODPECKER 
Dryobates pubesceno 
This gentle bird may be seen quite frequently in November and 
also in winter. Usually alone, the Downy Woodpecker is never 
noisy like most of the other woodpeckers, but utters its note de- 
murely while working on the bark of our forest or park trees. It 


would, be interesting to know what amount of good one Downy 
Woodpecker does for our trees in the way of searching in the bark » 


for the larve of injurious worms and insects. 


WHITE-BREASTED NUTHATCH 
Sitta carolinensts S 

This is the greatest acrobat among the bird tribe. It is always 
interesting to watch a Nuthatch climbing up or down the trunk of 
a tree. Both in woods and among park trees this useful bird may 
be found in winter or summer at work on the bark. More 
clever in climbing than the Chickadee, the Nuthatch can get at 
any part of a branch to examine it and find out whether there are 
any enemies hidden out of sight. 


> Meee ete ee 


. tid ‘ 


, Wi beac 2a ee oe. 


OUR BIRDS IN NOVEMBER 147 
CROW 

Corvus brachyrhynchos 
The Crow is an interesting bird at all seasons of the year, but 
most interesting in the bleak days of late autumn. Then he will 
enter our groves singly or in small numbers, flying about noise- 
lessly and occasionally cawing. Sometimes| great flocks of Crows 
may be seen feeding in corn fields, where they often rise, fly for a 

short distance, and then they alight again. 


CARDINAL 

: Cardinalis cardinalis 

The always striking Cardinal remains with us the year round, 
and is more common in autumn than at any other season of the 
year. He makes a beautiful picture perched in a bare apple tree 
in the orchard. Usually his call-note is first heard before one is 
aware of the bird’s presence. The Cardinal does not whistle in 
November or during the winter months. 


RED-HEADED WOODPECKER. 

Melaner pes erythrocephalus 
If you see any Red-headed Woodpeckers in November you may 
know that we shall have a mild winter. This is an infallible sign. 
Mr. John Burroughs published recently in the newspapers his 
opinion that we should have a severe winter, owing to the presence 
in Michigan of a number of Arctic birds supposed to be found 
there only in very cold weather. But I think the winter will be a 
mild one, for the Red-headed Woodpeckers are here in numbers. 


CHICKADEE 
Parus atricapillus 

At no other time of the year are Chicadees so common as in the 
month of November. In fact I think they are more in evidence then 
than-any other species of bird. Always confiding and easily ap- 
proached, they utter their well known notes with snap and vigor. 
Their disposition suggests smartness, while their trim appear- 
ance adds to their attractiveness. 


SNOWBIRD 
Junco hyemalis 
The snowbirds or juncoes are our favorite winter birds. But 
they are more abundant in late fall than in winter. When the 
ground is covered with snow, the juncoes seem to retire farther 


148 | THE AMERICAN MIDLAND. NATURALIST 

south, and only occasi nal flocks remain to eke out a scanty living 
in the snow. Always lively and chatty, the juncoes are a delight to 
the regular pedestrian. , 


: TREE SPARROW 
Spizella monticola 

This species is probably the latest arrival of the northern mig- 
rants. Similar in plumage and in call-notes to the Field Sparrow, 
the Tree Sparrow comes to our latitude about the time the former 
leaves us. For this reason it is not easy to be always sure which 
species you may find at this particular season. Another drawback 
in the matter of indentifying the Tree Sparrow, is its scarcity at 
the time it first appears. 


PURPLE FINCH 
Carpodams purpurens 

Late in autumn and in mild winters Purple Finches may be 
found in small flocks feeding on weed seeds. They loose their 
bright spring plumage before November, and are then difficult to 
distinguish from the English Sparrow. No longer is their sweet 
strain heard, but by a characteristic call-note, when known to the 
observer, is the easiest way of indentifying the species. 


\ 


Notes on Variation in Chicory. 


N. M. Grier, Pu. D. 

Chicory, (Cichorim Intybus, L.), has appeared in this section 
of the Shenandoah Valley-within the past few years. Recently the 
writer has had opportunity to observe its variation, especially with 
regard to floral structures. 

Flowers. Of the 412 specimens examined from various localities 
and the frequency of whose rays were plotted, those with 14 were 
found to be most numerous with a total of 76 cases. The curve 
of variation based on the data obtained was remarkable normal and 
free from ‘skewness’ in every respect. Minor modes were obtained 


for 13 rays in 64 cases at 15 in 65 cases. The least number of rays - 


found was six, the greatest 22. 
It appeared that as a whole, the rays were most numerous on 
heads obtained where the exposure was an open one, such as the 


| 


Ly oak ore 


<a e e 


OUR BIRDS IN DECEMBER 149 


roadside on a level stretch of ground, while they were most numerous 
in the leading classes of 13, 14, 15 rays when these were taken from 
hillsides consisting largely of rocky or infertile ground. In about 20 
of the 412 specimens the heads were solitary, and usually on 
elongated branches. Of the total number one was white in color, 2 
pink, and the others various shades of blue. 

Involucre. 238 of 259 outer involucres possessed 5 “bracts but 
there were 12 specimens with 6 bracts. The least number obtained 
here was 4, the greatest was 8. Greater variation was encountered 
in the inner portion. Here there were 140 cases of 8 bracts, 53 of 7, 
47 of 9: Least number obtained was 6, greatest was 10. 

With its rather extended distribution, and consisting as it does 
of a moderate number of floral parts, chicory should make where 
readily available, convenient laboratory material for the study of 
variation in classes of Biology. Unopened buds will flower until 2 
or 3 days after having been brought into the laboratory. 

Hollins College, Hollins, Va. 


Our Birds in December. 


BY BROTHER ALPHONSUS, C. S. C. 


It may be interesting to compare the records made by the writer 
for two Decembers—one (1918) a mild month; the other (1919) 
partly a cold month. With most of the species the number records 


= 
> 
bg. 
e 
y 
- 
2 
= 
En 
Ls 


% ; was somewhat larger for December, 1918. On the other hand the 
a Downy Woodpecker had notably more records for December 1919. 
4 The records for the two years under comparison would seem to 
a indicate that a difference in the temperature does not necessarily 
= 


show there are fewer species found when the weather is cold. 
All the birds except the Hairy Woodpecker and Screech Owl 
were seen in both Decembers. 

The cold weather in December, 1919, moderated after the 
middle of the month, and then most of the re cords for the Cardinal 
and the Purple Finch were made. . 


t 


A” Ge NLD 


DECEMBER 1918. 


in. a yak Doh ie cs, 


Hairy Woodpecker, 6, 9, 28. 
Downy Woodpecker, 6, 15. 


150 | HE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST | 


FO) Sa! 393) 23546; 
Goldfinch, 11, 12, 13. 
White-breasted Nuthatch, 1, 3 to 19, 21, 23, 25 to 29. 
Blue-Jay, 1 to 7; 10 86°13;715, 227,18, 16, 29; 9e: 
Crow, 2,11; -15, 16; 19; 233525) 26;¢28, 29,2497 
Chickadee,..3,-5° tovg, IT, 9,14, 85, 10; Tey. 20. 


Song Sparrow, 3, 53, 6; -8,.0, 40; ¥3; BA, 86, Ty 739,29, 25126, ates 


Cardinal; 8} 12, 04,15; 167918, 22,2 75. oe 
Snowbird, 1,6 to 15, 17 to 20, 23, 24, 27, 28,°30. 
Tree Sparrow, 5, 6, 9, 14, 15, 17, 18, 23, 26 to 29. 
Brown Creeper, 1, 6: 

Purple Finch, 7, 25, 27, 28, 30. 
Mourning Dove, 26, 27. 

Total number of species seen, 15. 


DECEMBER, I9QI9Q. 


Downy Woodpecker, 2, 3, 5, 8, II, 12, 13, 21, 22, 28. 

Red-headed Woodpecker, 2, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 14, 16, 17 ,19, 20, 21, 
26, °27;° 31: 

Goldfinch, 14 

White-breasted Nuthatch, 1 to 5, 7, 8, 9, 12 to 16, 19, 20, 22, 
24,25; 31. 

Blue Jay; $775. 85:9," Ley 22; Es, | Sto eae e OG. ea aie 

Crow, -2;¢7, '9; 26: 

Chickadee,:1 to 5; 8; 12;.16; -17;-20,*21,- 25; 27: 

Song Sparrow, I, 2, 3, 9, 12, 14, 25. 

Tree Sparrow, 23. 

Cardinal, i15,;.°19;/ 23730: 

Snowbird) 1, °2;-35 6,7," Ply to, 226: 

Brown Creeper, 9,-27. 

Purple Finch, 3, 19, 25. 

Mourning Dove, 2. 

Screech Owl, 16. 

Total number of species seen, 15. 


Red-headed Woodpecker, 1, 2, 6, 7,16, LT) 12,13; 1A; 5; 807 1S20 


—- 
‘ 
é 
i 


| 


y 


Mot The 


RR A AA LT AS 


A ERLE TE EE SE 


2 on ae AS SS \ 
. eS ete D . 
“ Ts gee z 
. P's E 
Sees ke Oe cn 4 
f : ; Patek Fa L p 
a, LAS, ry 
Ie E> =e $ 
Z * = en AST e REF IR 
2 - € a i Ses e 
rh : 4 x tS 
- Moras} ee aes 
z Rs) Ge ys erste 
k - Pe 
+ oe apt 
La y; 


a a Sn 


Dae NOTE: 


Contributions on general and midland. natural 


iM history will be gladly received. Papers on botany 
and allied subjects, zoology, geology and physical 


geography, should be addressed to the editor.* | 
Matters relating to advertisements are to be 


taken up with the secretary of the University. 


One hundred reprints of articles averaging 


eight pages or more will be furnished free of charge 


to contributors. More than one hundred separates can 


_ be obtained at cost price of the extras. When articles 
consist of less than eight pages, a certain number - 


of copies of THE AMERICAN MIDLAND: NATURALIST in 
which the paper appeared will be supplied free, or 


the separate articles may, by arrangement with the 


editor, be kept until future papers average eight pages, 
provided the contributions are sent in for the next 
consecutive issue for publication. Contributors of 


articles will receive a free subscription for the year 


in which their paper appears. For further or other 
information address 
THE EDITOR, Notre Dame, Indiana. 


5A RE SS x 


URSA SAA 


| 
| 
| 
| 
| 


i 
} 


The 


NOTRE. DAME, INDIANA 


College of Arts and Letters. College of Engineering. 


by the public as a college whose work is of the same grade as 


has ever attended the, University of Notre Dame can escape its 
influence in after life. 


The discipline is paternal, and aims at giving young men the 
fullest liberty consistent with earnest study and manly Christian 
character. Rooms at reasonable rates. Catalogue sent on 
application. i 


Address: 
TERE GTS PR AR 


NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


So eo oe oe eee ee ee Se Se SeSeSe SeSes eS Se SeSeSeseSe5e525e5e25e5rSe5e25e5e2 


University of Notre Dame 


Departments of Ancient Classics, Departments of Civil Engineering, 
Modem Literature, History, ,Mechanical Engineering, 
Political Economy, Sociology, Electrical Engineering, Chemical 
Domestic Commerce, F orsign - Engineering, Mining Engineering, : 
Commerce, Journalism, Library Industrial Engineering. 
Scietice. 
* 
College of Science. | 
Departments of Chemistry, College of Law. 
Physics, Biology, Pharmacy, ' 
prencaiae Colle eof Fine Arts. 
College of Architecture. Departments of Artistic Drawing, 
Departments of Construction, Painting, Cartooning, Instrumental 
Design. Music, Vocal Music. 
Preparatory School. St. Edward Hall. 
Variant Courses. For Young Boys. 


that of the most highly endowed colleges or the best state univ-- 
sities. Its atmosphere is strongly Catholic and no young man who — 


C 


Notre Dame is recognized by all educators, by the press and - 


| 
, 
, 
| 
| 


oe eas a ge 


SESpS <a ee 
= e i - Se, 


ret | VOL. VI. | kins MARCH, 1920 i” , NO, 8 


wuttian MIDLAND 
NATURALIST. 


Devoted to Natural History, Primarily 
that of the Prairie States 


Published by the University of Notre Dame, 


Notre Dame, Indiana 


i 
(AP! 


J. A. NIEUWLAND, C.S. C., Ph. D., Sc. D., Editor X@tiong) \ 


i 


CONTENTS 
Notes on Alabama Plants W. Wolf, O. S. B.. 151 


The Biological Significance of Selective Adsorption 
Sree . Jean Dufrenoy 159 


Sexual Dimorphism and Some of Its Correlations in the Shells 
of Certain Species of Najades. N.M. Grier, Ph. D. 165 


The Prairie Mirage Howard C. Brown 172 
Bird Nests Found at Spring Lodge in 1919. Frank C. Evans 177 


PRICE $1.50 A YEAR SINGLE NUMBERS 30 CENTS 
FOREIGN, 6s. 6d. 


Entered as second-class matter-at Notre Dame, Indiana. Acceptance for mailing at special 
rate of postage provided for in section 1103, Act of October 3, 1917, 
authorized on July 3, 1918, 4 


THE UNIVERSITY PRESS, NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


Back Numbers of “The hineteas Midland Natural Ui 


Vol. I.—(1909-1910) 293 Pp Unbound. nnnn innocence eeeeeneenen $2.00 

Vol. Il.—(1911-1912). 330 pp. Unbound and exclusive of 3 Reprints 
to*be bound in end ofswoly 3.4402. e oe eee us Se 2.00 
Inclusive of Three Reprints (see below). Extra....... hg te EK a ng Se 


Vol. II].—(1913-1914). 383 pp. Unbound, exclusive of Reprint No. 4.- 
(See below). |Nos. 1, 2, 3, 7.) are scarce and nearly out of print, 


GOStINg 50 Cts CAC ee ee neta at acca gd tthe 4.50 

Inclusive of Reprint No. 4, extra. ico.c ccd ia eceteetednacededeceeseneeacceeeetes 1.00 
Vol. IV.— (1915-1916). Unbound.........o2.22 eee PNA Sime Mapa ELLIS Wactodty 4) 4:00. 
Vol. Vi-—(vor7—1918)- Unbound 1h a a LA Aa Oy 


"Total—$ 17.75 


| Publications. 

Haun, W. Analytic Study of Faunal Changes in Indiana, 2 plates, 
$910." SR DP pee ee SB eral $ 15 

GREENE, Ii, I... Leaflets of Botanical Observation and Criticism. 
2 vols Complete. (1903-1912)...--..---.-.-----------. | 6.00 

Nl : Cybele ‘Columbiana, A series of Studies in Botany, 

chiefly North American: No. 1. (Other num- 
“Se bess £0 LOM OW) sy eS ee tas Beis agi Sass See 75 

sis Pittonia, A series of Papers Realting to Botany and 
Botanists, 5 vols. (1887—1905)....--2-—-- 22 14.00 

WM Flora Franciscana, Parts I, II, III. [Part IV pub- 

lished long after the other parts, is quite 

unobtainable, as all copies not immediately 

distributed seem to have been lost in the San 
Francisco fire.]_ Price as published.............-...-. 2.00 

” ig Manual of the Botany of the Region of San Fran- 
cisco Bay (1894). Bound cloth... 2.00 
BE ry ofa] b hey: keaulucet ates (Omen aa EPMI NUM TOD Sine ONS Wale Py as NEA Ett hy 1.50 
(Price as published of latter) ..220.0..00.22e-eeetceeeeee 2,00 

UTTERBACK, W. 1. Naiades of Missouri, 200 pp. 29 pl. and some text 
FIAT FES A ey IE EW Pee aA FC Care AN 1.75 
Reprints. 

RAFINESQUE,\C.'S)') Neogenyton, (1825) 22.62 ee ee $7.26 
"i 4 The Natural Family of the Carexides (1840)........ .50 

au Mi Scadiography or 100 Genera of Ombelliferous 
Plarits (ete... (1840) 22) ee as ASIST: ott Sia 1.50 


Monographie des Coquilles Bivalves et Fluvia- 
tiles de la Riviere Ohio. Remarques sur les 
Rapports Naturels des Genres Viscum, Samolus 
et Viburnum. A Bruxelles (1820).....2222202.... 1.50 
LECONTE, J. B. Reprints of Monographs without plates, $2.50; with 
42 photographic copies of unpublished plates 
(7x8), $25.00; with colored photographic plates...$37.50 
I.ECONTE, J. E. Two extra plates reproduced from originals in N. Y. 
Bot. Garden. Colored, $1.50; uncolored-............. 1.0¢c 


ee eS ans | 


.. 


Nee ee eee Ce OES ee eRe 


The Somer Midland Naturalist 


PUBLISHED BI-MONTHLY BY THE UNIVERSITY 
OF NOTRE DAME, NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


TOL. Vi MARCH, 1020. NO. 8 


Notes on Alabama Plants. 
a t APP 34 
BY W. WOLF, O. S. B. ‘ 


. “Sto; 


TALINUM. 

Dr. Charles Mohr in the Systematic Catalogue of his principal 
work, the Plant Life of Alabama, which appeared in 1901 as Vol. 
VI., Contributions from the U. S. National Herbarium, includes 
Talinum teretifolium Pursh as a member of the Alabama Flora. 
He mentions four counties where the species is definitely known 
to have been discovered, and indicates its restricted distribution 


‘there with the remark ‘‘not frequent, local.’’ The counties men- 


tioned lie in two distant sections of the State; the one in the 
central part of Northern Alabama, the other in the Eastern central 
part of the State. Three of the four counties, which are adjoining, 
are located in the former section, viz., Walker, Blount, and Cullman. 
Special localities are given for Walker and Blount Counties, none 


- for Cullman. In the other section, a single station, Baldrock in 


Clay County, is mentioned. The elevation of this last being specified 
as 2200 feet, against 800 for Cullman and 1000 for Blount County. 

For the present it is not my purpose to discuss the identity of 
the plants for the State in general with Talinum teretifolium Pursh 
as I have not had an opportunity of examining specimens from the 
several localities preserved in the herbarium of the Geological 
Survey of Alabama. I cannot, however, wholly refrain from 
touching on the matter in so far as Cullman County is concerned, 
for I have discovered a species distinct from the Talinum terett- 
folium Pursh though closely related to it. Unfortunately Mohr 
does not specify a definite locality for Cullman County. The 
statement of altitude, however, is of some value, for it shows that 
crests of higher elevation were not the station or stations where 
oa ee « 


Tle. p. 496. 1901. 


152 HE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


the plant was discovered, but that he refers only to the approximate 
level of that table land which is about 800 feet above sea level. 

A second remark of Mohr has an indirect bearing on the question, 
and seems to support the suspicion that the plant reported from 
‘this part of the State is perhaps identical with the Talinum of 
my own discovery, and that it was confounded with Pursh’s 
Talinum teretifolium. He credits the discovery of the plant in 
this locality to the Misses Emily and Mary Mohr. Now these 
ladies lived in the central part of the county, a mile or so distant 
from Cullman, and close to the Little River (Eight Mile Creek) 
where it flows through the premises of St. Bernard College. Not 
very far east of the College grounds, the banks of the stream,— 
‘river’ is a misnomer,—become cliily, the place being commonly 
known as ‘The Cli7s.” It is from this station that I secured my 
plants, and, in my mind, there is little doubt that it is likewise the 
place where the Misses*Mohr made their discovery. — 

That the plant from this locality might have passed without 
critical examination as Talinum teretifolium is not very surprising; 
first, because this was considered the only species in the North, 
as well as in the South Eastern States; secondly, because of the 
short diagnosis which was considered sufficient by the earlier 
authors. ‘Pursh’s! classical diagnosis, ‘‘ 7. foliis cylindricis carnosts, 
corymbis terminalibus pedunculatis,” is such that it applies equally 
well to any species with terete leaves and a terminal peduncled 
inflorescence, here termed a corymb, but in reality a cyme. 

In Chapman’s Flora, formerly the leading manual for the South, 
no character is mentioned which would be of any use in the present 
case. In Gray’s well known Manual of Botany? of the Northern 
United States, mention is made of one character which proves of 
value in point of comparison, viz., the varying number of stamens 
in the species Talinum teretifolium, limiting them from 15-20. 
This limiting of the number of stamens is in strong contrast with 
that found in the plant which I have discovered in Cullman County, 
in which the minimum is above forty. This diference, it seems 
should have aroused suspicion regarding the identity of the plant 
with T. teretifolium Pursh. Too much emphasis, however, must not 
be laid upon this point, for every practical taxonomist knows that 
the first statement about a limit, in case of variable characters, 


1 Pursh Fl. Am. Sept. 2; 365. 1814. 
2 A. Gray Man., 5th ed. p. 98. 


: . 


\ 


7 


Lhe em. Fe 


- 


ee re Oe ee ee 


sii lala 


- 


NOTES ON ALABAMA PLANTS _ 183 


is not necessarily very reliable, and, not infrequently, must be 
accepted with caution. Such a character, however, may become 
very valuable in the course of time if it proves constant under 
further observation. \ 

~Robinson and Fernald’s Gray’s New Manual confirms the con- 
stancy of the limit-as stated in Gray’s older manual. The same 
limit—15-20—is mentioned in Small’s Flora of the South Eastern 
United States,4 but with the restricting remark ‘‘usually.’’ It is 
not clear whether this ‘‘usually”’ refers to an occasionally lower or 
higher number, but -the former seems more probable when we 
refer to the key, which reads, ‘‘stamens less than 25.’’ In Britton’s 
works, the Manual of the Flora of the Northern States, and the 
Illustrated Flora, the limit is extended both ways, viz., 10-30, 
against Gray’s 15-20. Another good character is mentioned in 
these works, viz., the length of the style as compared with that of 
the stamens. This character with that regarding the number of _ 
stamens unquestionably makes the plant from the Cliffs on the 
Little River in Cullman County a species distinct from Talinum 
teretifolium Pursh. 

The species is*easily recognized by: stamens more than 40; 
style protruding beyond the stamens about as much as their 
respective length; petals 9-13 mm. long. It becomes then 


Talinum Mengesii, spec. nov. 
Type specimen in Herbarium St. Bernard College, no. 1668. 

Plant succulent, glabrous, 2-4 dm. tall, perennial by a short 
horizontal rootstock which is sometimes branched, or. the innova- 
tions arise from a very short vertical caudex; roots slender, fibrous, 
Stems tufted, generally few or single, 3-10, or rarely up to 15 cm. 
high, unbranched for almost the whole length, the one to five 
branches arising from near the top just below the base of the long 
wiry peduncle by which the stem is terminated. The branches, 
from a few to 10 cm. long, are often branched again at their ends 
from below the secondary peduncles, but these secondary branches 
generally do not develope beyond the phase of fascicled leaves, in 
other cases, however, grow to normal size and terminate into 
peduncles. The leaves are quite numerous but not crowded on the 
stem and branches, terete, 2-5.5 cm. long, 1.5-3 mm. thick, not 


4_Small's BLS. U,.8.--p; 440. 1903: 
5 Brit's, Mani N.'U..S).& €.. -p: 385. . 1905: 


154 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


dilated at the base, the backward prolongation less than 1 mm. 
long, the apex bluntly pointed. The scape-like peduncles are slender 
but stiff and wiry, 7-20 m. long; the cyme is open and only occa- 
sionally corymbosely branched, but as a rule is umbkellate, having 
generally three branches, which are from a few to 12 cm. long and 
radiate from below the central flower; the bracts are hardly 2 mm. 
long, inclusive of the posterior prolongation and are lanceolate- 
ovate; the pedicels are clavate and 5-10 mm. long. The sepals are 
3, 5-4 mm. long about one third.as long as the petals, ovate, obtusish. 
The corolla is rose-purple; the petals are mainly obovate, mucronu- 
late, 9-13 mm. long, closing again after spreading for one day or 
some hours, withering, and at length, like the sepals, deciduous. 
Stamens 45-100, or occasionally a few more, but most commonly 
50-80; filaments distinct, not adnate to the base of the petals, 
purple; anthers golden yellow. Style distinctly excerted beyond 


the stamens about as much as their own average length. Capsule. 


3-4 mm. high, subglobuse, angled at the sutures, 3-, or sometimes, 
4- valved. Seeds 1 mm. wide, black, almost smooth, and slightly 
shining. . 

The plant in this station has little chance of holding its place in 
the far future which it once occupied in the past, namely, on the 
cliff bank of the Little River. The inhabited locality is already 
broken up into separated patches, the plant being now replaced 
by various species which were unable to adapt themselves to the 
formerly prevailing conditions. Talinum Mengesi is a plant content 
with a scant accumulation of soil on the exposed naked surface of 
the rock, sometimes establishing itself in such small quantities of 
soil that it cannot produce a proper rootstock for the first time 
because of insufficient protection. The accumulating soil is rich 
in organic matter, but I have seen plants flourishing equally well 
in pure sand, in a somewhat lower situation about an abandoned 
stone crushing mill. The plant frequently roots between the de- 
composing bases of xerophile bryophytes of an upright habit, 
which form patches on the rocks, from a hand’s space to a few 
square feet, and offer a good protection for the plant’s rootstock. 
In such situations the plant grows with practically no soil. But 
even in cases of a more upbuilt soil, this is rarely more than 1 cm. 
deep. Not so content is the plant in as far as light is concerned, 
for it is dependent on bright open sunshine, and this, under the 
circumstances of advanced soil conditions is its misfortune in the 


2 
t 
: 
a 
\ - 
Sol 
‘ 
: 
f 
‘ 
x 
; 


® 
is 
x 
oe 
~ 
x, 
ee. 
-. 


6b EE RE, Ey 


NOTES ON ALABAMA PLANTS 155 


resulting competition. When the soil is about one cm. deep, sooner 
or later, accommodation of flowering plants other than Talinum 
Mengesii sets in. The first one which associates with this species is 
Alsinopsis glabra Small (Alsine glabra Michx.), yet, at least for 


’ the first, without interfering with the flourishing of the Talinum 


Mengesit. Because the former plant is a slender open branched, 
wiry, and rather short living annual with but a few small leaves, no 
serious overshading or crowding is effected, and thus both species 
tolerate one another very well. Yet the appearance of this species 
is a sign that the time is near at hand when 7. Mengesii is doomed 
to give up its habitat. By and by other species, well fitted to form 
a closer plant association in a still scanty soil, begin to establish 
themselves with Talinum Mengesii and Alsinopsis glabra. Among 
the first of these are Crotonopsis linearis Michx., Sarothra gentian- 
oides L., Polygala Curtissit A. Gray, Allium microscordion Small, 
etc. These are all sun loving plants, but unlike Talinum Mengesii, 
tney maintain themselves well in the grassy swales which row 
establish themselves on the formerly barren rock, whence that 
species in this time of progression has already been outcrowded. 


ARUNDINARIA TECTA (WALT) MUHL. 


It is rather universally known that Arundinaria tecta like the 
other North American Species A. macrosperma Michx. does not as 
rule flower each succeeding year, but remains sterile for longer or 
shorter periods, generally producing flowers only at intervals of 
several or even many years. However, such a uniform conception 
does not prevail in regard to the arrangement of the inflorescence 
on the plant, i. e..—that part of the plant upon which the flowers 
are borne. The interpretation of the leading manuals of the Eastern 
flora is responsible for this difference of opinion on the character 
in question. This is to be regretted the more since it is a case in 
which the majority of botanists are unable to obtain first hand 
information through actual observation because of the two factors, 
namely; the sterility and the restricted habitat of the plant. 

Curiously enough the uncertainty arises in the diagnosis found 
in the descriptions of Arundinaria tecta given by the authors of 
the newer manuals, viz.—Gray’s New Manual, Britton’s Manual 
of the Flora of the U.S., and Small’s Flora of South-Eastern U. S., 
while in the older manuals, viz——Gray’s Manual, and Chapman’s 
Flora, the diagnosis of the point in question is far more complete. 


156 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


For clearness’ sake let me give an example: In the fifth edition of 
Gray’s own work, Manual of Botany,‘ that part of the description 
which relates to the inflorescence reads, “‘spikelets solitary or in a 
simple raceme at the summit of the branches or frequently on 
leafless radical culms.’’ At the end of this text we find the word 
‘““Chapman”’ and from this we learn that the foregoing statement 
is not based on Gray’s own observations, but that it is accredited 
to the authority of Chapman. Thus it might seem that the citation 
of the diagnosis should have been more justly quoted from Chap- 
man’s own work, but let me emphasize the fact that Gray himself is 
not guilty of the violation attributable to the recent authors 
whose work sails somewhat under the protection of Gray’s au- 
thority, since his name is associated with the title of the book. 
The wording in Chapman’s original work, The Flora of the Southern 
United States,” is literally the same and needs no repetition. 

Upon Chapman’s authentical and precise diagnosis we must 
assume that the flowers may appear on both parts of the plant, 
namely, on the branches of the leafy culms and on the distinct 
radical culms. The text in Robinson and Fernald’s Gray’s New. 
Manual? reads, ‘‘ panicles of few spikelets on long slender branches.” 
The wording differs from that of the old Manual but it does not 
interfere in our case, for only the words ‘“‘on branches”’ relate to the 
point in question. A comparison with Chapman’s text, as adopted 
by Gray in his own, publication, shows that only a part of the 
diagnosis has been retained by the authors of the New Manual, i.e., 
that the inflorescence is borne on the branches. The part relating 
to the radical culms is entirely discarded. 

Consulting leading manuals of another school, we find a state- 
ment contrary to the one found in ‘‘Gray’s New Manual.” This, 


however, is a part of Chapman’s diagnosis, the very part which . 


the authors of Gray’s New Manual have rejected. The works 
referred to are, ‘“‘Britton’s Manual of the Flora of the Northern 
United States and Canada’’ and Small’s ‘‘Flora of the South- 
eastern United States.’’ In Britton’s Manual‘ the text reads, 
‘“‘racemes on short leafless culms;”” in Small’s Flora,5 ‘‘inflorescence 
borne on short leafless stems.”’ 

Thus it is obvious that neither in the so called Gray’s New 


Manual nor in the other two works, Britton’s Manual and Small’s- 


SAC (prc 8: 21. . ep: {5 6reT882, 
oT er pl 1717 1908: 41. @. p. 158. 1905, 9. [cp -16 Ee nooss 
p 


abeaaatrnsis iis te ie hdiod! alta 


vA a ore 


\ 


: 
4 


NOTES ON ALABAMA PLANTS : ; 157 


Flora is a character found which is not included in Chapman’s 
diagnosis, and to which Asa Gray faithfully adhered in the publica- 
tion of his own Manual. This only is new and strange, viz., that 
Chapman’s diagnosis has been divided. The authors of the one 
school made part of his statement their own, while those of the 
other school were content with the rest of it. 

This violation of Chapman’s diagnosis becomes more pronounced 
from the fact that in Britton’s Manual, and also in Small’s Flora,? 
the retained part is made use of as a specific distinction in con- 
nection with the size of the plant, for the ancy presented with the 
genus Arundinaria reads: 

“Spikelets borne on radical shoots of the year; culms 4 m. tall or less, 
——=L A. tecta. 

Spikelets borne on the old stems; Culms 5 m. tall or more,—2 A. 
macrosperma.”’ 

The above citation is from Britton’s work and is identical with 
that found in Small’s Flora in regard to A. tecta, and almost the 
same in regard to A. macrosperma. But Chapman’s full text on 
this part is; ‘‘frequently on leafless radical culms.’”’ Now, it is 
logically not the same to simply state ‘‘on radical shoots”’ in place 
of ‘‘frequently on . . . radical culms.’ The rejection of the word 
“‘frequently’’ becomes almost a necessity in order to make the 
character a specific distinction. 

Now, although the authors of these recent manuals (Hitchcock 
is credited with having elaborated the Graminee in Gray’s New | 
Manual, Nash, this same family in Small’s Flora) have reached 
conclusions which led to the discarding of a part of Chapman’s 
diagnosis as a result of actual observations or, examination of 
herbarium material, this does not justify their rejection of either 
of the two characters for the very reason that the species is an 
exceptionally rare object of observation in the flowering state. 
Furthermore the observation of only one phase is no absolute proof 
against the other. The contradiction resulting from the method 
used by these authors is plainly evident, for the author in the New 
Manual tells that the flowers appear on the branches; while the 
authors of Britton’s Manual and Small’s Flora state on the con- 
trary that the flowers are borne on radical shoots. It was the duty 
of these authors to retain both diagnostic characters and place 
the responsibility on Chapman, a botanist of sufficient ability to 


E esp. 158..1905- 2e1 es py LOTstQOB. 


~ 


158 | ‘THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


make correct observations on such conspicuous characters. In_ 
case this should not have satisfied the authers, they could have 
expressed their doubt in the customary way by placing a question 
mark after Chapman’s statement. 

To do justice to Dr. Chapman, in bringing his diagnosis to the 
test, the results of my own observations are herewith presented. 
The following short statement is based on observations of the 
species Arundinaria tecta Muhl, and is not, as it might seem, a 
compilation of the characters of both species, A. tecta and A. 
macros perma. Fg 

The following facts are obtained by observations and collections 
of plants from a locality where, I am certain, A. macrosperma does 
_ not occur, namely, about St. Bernard, Cullman County, Northern 
Alabama. Mohr in his Plant Life of Alabama’ expressly excludes 
the table lands in his report on the habitat of A. tecia ,but this 
report is superseded, at least in part, by later discoveries. 


According to my observations the inflorescence on Arundinaria ~ 


tecta Muhl is borne on the so called leafless radical culms (2-9 dm. 
high) of the season and with sheaths terminated by minute blades: 
on leafly radical culms of the season with blades somewhat dis- 
similar in size and appearance from those of the vegetative culms, 
10 cm.; or less long and 1 cm. or less wide: on radical culms of the 


season with blades rather similar to those of the vegetative culms; | 


culms and leaf blades of moderate size: on the summit of leafly 
branched and unbranched culms of the season, similar to the 
vegetative culms in size and appearance: on the summit of the 
culm and the end of the branches of leafly branched culms of the 
season, and of the same habit as moderately branched vegetative 


culms. Occasionally branched culms of the preceding season were _ 


found with profuse flowering branches, which arose from the 
crowded sheaths of the ultimate branches of the previous year. 
The leaves in these cases had fallen during the winter. 

Spikelets 6.5 cm. long, and also spikelets up to 15-flowered have 
peen observed. (Herb. St. Bernard College, Nos. 445 and 446.) 


St. Bernard College, 
St. Bernard, Ala. 


+ PLL, of Ala. Contrib; -U.'S..Natierb. (6380.21 Gans 


oe ele 


2 
4 
; 
: 
j 
- 

; 

q 


BIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF ADSORPTION 159 


The Biological Significance of Selective Adsorption. 


BY JEAN DUFRENOY. 


Modern biologists come more and more to view living matter in 
the light of colloid complexes, of which those constituting nucleo 
and cytoplasma may be termed ‘‘cyto-colloids,’’ whereas those 
building cell-walls or intercellular spaces may be named ‘‘histo- 


“ colloids.”’ 


Adsorption is a most important property of colloids. Adsorption 
indeed, is most satisfactorily explained as a concentration of a 
solute at a surface, and colloids offer much useful surface. 

Certain surfaces not only have the power of adsorbing a solute 
as a whole from solution, but have the power of adsorbing a part 
of a solute at a greater rate than the other. © 

That an ion may be thus selectively adsorbed from an electrolyte, 
concomitant or previous hydrolysis of the electrolyte is of course 
necessary. - 

Living matter being colloidal, is possessing selective adsorbing 
properties, which may tentatively furnish an explanation of the 
metabolic processes in the living being, and of the migration of 
solutes into the cells, or of the color reaction of the tissues. 

A most convenient biocolloid to experiment on, was furnished 
to us by the mucous deposits in. the thermal springs of Baréges 
(Pyrénées). These deposits long known as “‘ Barégine”’ are zoogle 
secreted by various Bacteriacea. True Baregine, as defined by us, 
is a furfuroid, soluble in xanthogenate reagents, as distinguished 
from the cell wall proper of the Bacteria, which is made up of 
nonsoluble chitin-like material. [8, 11.] 


I.—BASOPHILOUS ADSORPTION. 


Many vegetable histo-colloids have a superior adsorbent capacity 
for bases, and redden blue litmus, (which is a salt, containing a 
strong base, while the acid is the red dye itself.) 

This reddening is easily observed in the case of Barégine by the 
follewing experiments: (1.) Blue litmus which is made to filter 
through a plug of Barégine, first filters red, and later on filters 
uncolored. (2) Blue litmus, kept in a glass tube above a plug 
of Barégine, reddens, and in a few hours loses its color from its 


160 THE AMERICAN’ MIDLAND NATURALIST 


contact to the Barégine upwards. In both cases, adsorption is 
selective at first, and total ultimately. 


2.—CONSEQUENCES OF BASOPHILOUS ADSORPTION. 


There is a struggle for bases constantly going on between baso- 
philous colloids in the plant and those in the habitat. This is 
most conveniently studied in the cases of ‘unicellular plants: 
Iron-bacteria, Diatoms, but it is as important for flowering plants 
in the field. But even the different parts of the same plants struggle 
for bases, and this should be studied first. 


I1.—METACHROMASIA. 


Many blue dyes are salts, containing colored base and aeid 
radicals. Either the base or the acid, when free, may be itself a 
red dye. 

Whenever basophilous substances are in contact with these 
blue salts containing a red free base, they color red, by adsorbing 
the red base. 

The red color displayed by colloids bathing in blue solutions 
is termed metachromatic. 

Therefore, most cases' of metachromasia readily explain 
by selective adsorption, and we actually observed substances 
which color metachromatically to be basophilous: For instance, 
such zoogle in the Barégine, which adsorb Fe or Cu as bases from _ 
their salts, also color red a basic blues (Naphtylen blue, Methylen 
blue.) 

The same explanation no doubt holds for cyto-colloids; and the 
so called ‘‘metachromatic granules’”’ in the cells certainly are 
basophilous gels (or maybe sols). Indeed, metachromatic granules 
were artificially produced, where metachromasia is the result of 
selective basophilous adsorption:. A drop of a xanthogenate 
(obtained by dissolving Barégine into CS,~+KOH mixture) being 
placed in contact with a drop of aqueous solution of naphtylen 
blue or Polychrome blue, it appears an emulsion of tiny red granules, 
exactly alike the metachromatic granules in the cells. 

Metachromatic granules are conspicuous substances in the cell, 


* Some cases may result of different colors displayed by the same solute 
as its solvent changes, as assumed by Moreau.? In fact, we found the 
‘‘insoluble blue acid of the-Congo, to yield a red solution in Amylic alcohol. 

2 F. Moreau, Sur les phéno. de métachromasie: Bull. Soc. bot. France, 
t, *635.4p.072, 1910. 


: 
4 
zi 
‘@ 


BIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF ADSORPTION 161 
but their significance is still doubtful. They have been demon- 
strated by Guilliermond and Moreau [15, 19] to be secreted by 
mitochondria, and, in that respect, it is to be noted that in the 
Sulfuro-bacteriacea such as Thiothrix sp., free sulfur, in the form 
of intra-cellular globules, deposits only in contact of or inside 
of metachromatic granules. 

, Other substances, such-as oxalate of potassium, were often 
found in cells the content of which Had degenerated into a baso- 
philous substance, and the relations of basophilous biccolloids to 


_ salts in the cell, demand further investigation. That it may be of 


biological interest, appears from the fact that, while nucleo-chroma- 
tine is acidophilous in healthy cells, it shows marked basophily in 
tumour cells of Pines. [8] 

This change may result from an altered proportion between 
base-adsorbent and acid-adsorbent nucleo compounds, or it may be 
that bases becoming deficient, the base-requirement of the acid 
nucleo-compounds is no more satisfied. 


2.—STRUGGLE FOR BASES FROM Host TO PARASITE. 


Marked basophily is often’ observed in diseased tissues, due to 
development of much pectic material. [6] 

Basophily is conspicuous in the wood of trees, where it is infected 
by mistletoe. Which wood was found by Councler to be deficient 
in Ca, but to be rich in PO,H, and K,O. Basophilous degeneres- 
cence may offer to the parasitized tissue a way to oppose the 
migration of bases from host to parasite. 


3.—IRON DEPOSING BACTERIA. 


Adsorption again plays an important réle in the depositing of 
iron ore by “iron bacteria.”’ 5 

The phenomena is easily studied in the hottest thermal springs 
of Baréges (t°=42°.8 cent.) where Ferro-coccus were observed at 
various stages of development. 

At first they are free, isolated or actively-dividing, highly re- 
fringent and thin-walled globules, imbedded in a basophilous 
zoogle. Later on, they crowd as Staphylo-coccus, their walls 
thicken and become impregnated with Iron, (easily precipitated 
blue by Hydrochloric ferrocyanide or red by Sulfocyanide of 
Potassium. ) 

The older Staphyloccus ultimately form a thin rusty crust, of 


tc aa THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


which the iron is no more soluble, or at least is not more inter- _ 
changeable with other bases such as Cu. . 

Although biochemical reactions may be efficient in changing 
the soluble iron salts from the thermal water, into the non-soluble af 
iron hydroxide, the adsorbing effect of the cell walls plays a great - 
rdle: in fact, Fe or Cu ions may be fixed in a few minutes by 
Barégine, and those parts which fix the metal most energically are 
also those which show the greatest basophily. 

It seems therefore that Fe ions are at first adsorbed from the 
solutions and then biochemically oxydized. 


4. DIATOMS. 


Building of siliceous skeletons by Diatoms was compared by 
Cohn to depositing of iron by Iron-bacteria. : 

Indeed, we found that Synedra affinis, growing in the Bassin 
d’Arcachon, near to rusting iron pieces, had developed a rusty 
color. Moreover,. we were able to grow rusty Diatoms in very 
weak solutions of Iron sulphates in sea water. These rusty Diatoms 
yielded Prussian Blue, by treatment with hydrochlorideferrocyanide. 

Here again we may turn to adsorption for an explanation; 
Diatoms possess, inside of their siliceous skeleton, a very thin 

z pectic wall, which may adsorb metallic ions, and which we made 
even to adsorb Cu. 


/ 


5.—STRUGGLE FOR BASES FROM SOIL TO PLANT. 


Most plants are in contact with the soil through the basophilous 
pectic walls of their root-hairs. 

These walls compete for bases with the basophilous compounds 
in the soil. . 

Bases may be in excess in soils and then easily obtainable by 
plants, or they may be strongly fixed by the basophilous complex 
in the soil, such as humic acids, iron hydorxyde . . . the soil being 
then termed ‘‘acid.’’ Most plants thrive on the former soils, but 
there are few able to live on ‘‘acid soils.”” The former plants have 
been demonstrated to possess but feeble adsorbent power towards 
Ca ions, while the latter have a high competing power for bases. 


[17.] 


3.—ACIDOPHILOUS ADSORPTION. 


Some colloids, such as the basic gels: oxides of Z, Th, Al, La, 4 
Zn, Be, Fe and Cr, or celluloses, adsorb the acid more quickly 


eu Se ere oe 


- 


BIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF ADSORPTION 163 


than the base from dissolved salts. Cellulose is widely distributed 
in vegetable cell walls, where it is associated to pectic acid. Most 
cell walls therefore may adsorb basic colors by their pectic mem- 
brane, and acid dyes by their cellulos constituents. 3 

Adsorption of acid dyes, such as Congo red, Eosine, Fuchsin . . 
is conspicuous in the cell-walls of Sulfuro-bacteriacea, Thiothrix. . 
It is even so strong, that a small quantity of ati a placed in 
a solution entirely loses color. 

Acidophilous basic gels being widely distributed in the habitat 
and in histological tissues, may exert an adsorbent effect on the 
acid ions in the cell, which effect demands investigation. 


4. REACTIONS ACCOMPANYING ADSORPTION. 


Thermal waters from Baréges’ springs redden blue Congo by 
warming. 

This may be accounted for by supposing that basic gels exist in 
the thermal waters, which adsorb the acid of Congo red at ordinary 
temperature, without change in the color, which remains blue; 
on warming, chemical reaction takes place and a salt of Congo red 
is formed, a red color appearing. At the same time, an insoluble 
blue acid of the Congo is precipitated, which may again yield 
interesting adsorbent effect. 

Such reactions have called for the attention of numerous investi- 
gators and Wedekind and Rheinboldt conclude that adsorption 
effect may often precede chemical union, which seems specially 
true of biochemical reaction as was observed for iron depositing 
bacteria. 

SUMMARY. 

1. The compounds, in living cells or tissues, are colloids 
displaying selective adsorption effect. 

The constituents of cell walls and most granules i in the cytoplasm 
are base-adsorbent colloids; they compete for bases, each with 
the other, and with the basophilous colloids in the habitat. 

The constituents of nucleoplasma are generally acid-adsorbent, 
but may become base adsorbent in diseased cells. 

Cellulose, an acid-adsorbent colloid, is widely distributed in 
plant cells and may exert powerful adsorption towards acids. 

2. Adsorption effect may be preliminary to biochemical 
reaction, as is probably the case for iron depositing bacteria. 

3. Competition for bases may result in serious loss of bas2s in 


164 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST | 


the habitat, and considerable accumulation of bases in plant 
tissues. 


t 


LITERATURE CITED. 


1. AMES & SCHOLLENBERGER: Liming and lime requirement of soils. | 
Ohio Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 306, Wooster, dec. 1916. 

2. CLARKE: The data of geochemistry, U. S. Geologic. Surv. Bull. 1916. 

3. H. DEvaux:: Empoisonnement spontané des plantes aquatiques par 
les eaux du laboratoire de Botanique. Mem. Soc. Sc. Phys. et nat. Bordeaux, 
t. 1, 1896. 

4. H. DEvaux: Deplacement du Ca et des bases fixées dans la plante 
vivante, par d’autres bases contenuies dans le milieu ext. a l’état de sels. - 
P. V. Soc. Sc. phys. nat. Bordeaux, 27 janv. 1916. 

5. H. DeEvAux: Fixation tapide par la plante vivante du Fe et d’autres 
métaux lourds, Jbid, 13 avril 1916. . 

6. DuFRENOY, J. La dégénérescence pectique, C. R. Soc. biol. 1978. 

7. DUFRENOY, J. Sur les tumeurs bact. exp. du Pin, Compt. rend. t. 
169, Pp. 545, 12 Sept. 1919. 
_ 8. DurrEeNoy, J. & Mouinéry: Contrib. a une nouv. étude de la ~ 
baregine, Gaz. des eaux, aout 1919. 


9. DuFRENOY J.: L’adsorption sélective et ses conséquences Rev. gén. Sc. 
t..30, p. 607, 15 nov. IgI9. : 

10. DUFRENOY & MOLINERY: Etudes phys. chim. et. biol, sur les eaux 
thermales. (Bull. Ac. Med. 22 dec. 1919.) 

11. DUFRENOY, J.: Sur une méthode d’étude de la hareeine par homo- 
tae C. R. Soc. biol. Déc. 1919. 

. Gain, E.: Préface de la ‘‘ Bibliographie de l’action du Cu. sur les 
meutiats” Bulle. bibliographique de Bot. agric. publié par le labo. de Bot. de 
V Inst. Agr. de l Univ. de Nancy. Nancy, 1917. 

13. GUILLIERMOND: Chondriome dans 1’élaboration des prod. de réserve 
des champignons, Compi. rend. 1913. - 

14. GUILLIERMOND: La cytologie, ses méthodes et leur valeur. Rev. 
gen. Sc. pp. 166-74 & 208-16, 1916. 

15. GUILLIERMOND: Chondriome des végétaux, Rev. gén. Bot. p. 446, 
15 Oct. 1919. 

16. JUNGELSON: Intoxication chim. et mutation du mais, Compt. rend., 
toClLxs py 4812. Tois: 

17. LANGERON: Microscopie, p. 379, 415, Paris 1916. 


, 


18. MANGIN, lL. J. Sur les composés pectignes. Botanique, 1894. 


19. Moreau: Corpuscles métachromatiques dans les mitochondries. 
GR, Sot. btol;, Al jailarors. 

20. MourEau: Not. de Chimie org. p. 157 (Gauthier-Villars,) 1917. 

21. Petit: Coloration des membr. végé. par les sels métall. P. V. Soc. 
linn. Bordeaux, p. CXXXVIII, 1901. . 


. 


=r 


i 


SEXUAL DIMORPHISM OR 


22. PLIMMER: Pract. org. and biochemistry, p. 390, 1917. 


23.-TRUE & Harvey: Absorption of Ca salts by squash seedlings. 
Brooklyn Bot. Card. Mem. t. 1., pp. 502-13 1918. 
+ 24. ROBERT (MELLE TH.) Le role physiologique du Ca chez les végétaux. ~ 
Rev. gén. sc. p. 108, 1917. \ 
25. RussEL: Part played by colloids in agric. pheno. Rept. Brit. Ass. 
Ady. Sc. p. 75; 1919: 
26. WEDEKIND & RHEINBOLDT: Ber. V. 52 (B) pp. 1013-21, 1919; 
anal. in J: Chem. Soc. Abst. i.i. p. 270, July 1919. 


Sexual Dimorphism and Some of Its Correlations in the Shells of 
Certain Species of Najades. 


BY N. M. GRIER, PH. D. 


J.— INTRODUCTORY. 

Before Ortmann’s discovery that the sex of Najades could 
be readily learned from associated peculiarities of gill structure, 
(4, 5,), systematists had only general information—of the type 
later to be compared in this paper—from which to identify the 
sex of a mussel when glochidia were absent. Hazy, (2), and 
Israel, (3), were able to distinguish the sexes of certain European 
species by such characters as relative length, heiglit, and inflation. 
Israel, particularly, fouad associated with sex, certain colors of, 
the epidermis of the shell. The investigations of these latter 
writers extended only to 3 species, none of which are closely related 
to those dealt with in this paper, and their original work never 
seems to have been followed up. In addition there occur in the 
papers of American investigators from time to time, scattered 
references to the sexual dimorphism of certain species based on 
. some morphological feature of the shell. Such, however, are either 

. not concerned with the species we are interested in, or are already 
summarized by Simpson, (6), or Walker, (8), whose information © 
later will be brought out. 


IJ.—PROBLEM, METHOD, AND MATERIAL. 
: While pursuing another investigation on the comparative 
morphological characteristics of certain mussel shells inhabiting 
the Upper Ohio Drainage and their corresponding ones in Lake 
4 Erie, (1) the writer obtained data of the type indicated, which he 


~ 


166 . THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


proposes in this paper to associate as far as possible with the sex 
of the shells examined. 

The material used was Dr. A. E. Ortmann’s splendid collection 
of shells in the Carnegie Museum at Pittsburgh, Pa., and while 
the most complete account of how these measurements were 
taken is reserved until the publication of the research spoken of, 


the method of making them is described to what is believed to be — 


a comprehensible extent in the accompaning table dealing with 


sexual dimorphism. Here it may suffice to state that the dimen- 


sions taken were 7 in number and-included the measurement of, 

1.—Relative degree of inflation. 

2.—Height. 

3.—Posterior length of shell. 

4.—Anterior length of shell. 

5.—Length of posterior hinge line. 

6.—Length of anterior. hinge line. 

7.—Thickness of shell—in this investigation taken just 
superior to the pallial line in the region directly beneath the umbo 

In making these measurements an ordinary metric caliper 
and rule were used, the values obtained reduced to convenient 
factors by division into the length, with the exception of that of 
thickness, which it seemed desirable to compare with the height. 

Measurements were made on the following genera and species, 
viz., 


Fuscontya flava, Raf. . Paraptera fragilis, Raf. 
Amblema costata, Raf. ; Proptera alata, Say. 
Pleurobema obliquum coccineum,Con. Anodontotdes ferussacianus,Lea 
Elliptio dilatatus, Raf. Eurynia recta latissima, Raf. 
Symphynota costata, Raf. '  Lampszilis luteola, Lam. 

_ Anodonta grandis, Say. Lam pilis ovata ventricosa, Lam. 


The factors above described having been obtained, it was the 
practice while making comparisons in the endeavor to associate 
any of the 7 measured morphological dimensions with the sex of 
the shell, to compare equal numbers of both sexes of the species. 
An average was made of the values obtained by calculation for 
each dimension of the shell, and then this result compared with 
that similarly obtained from the other sex of the animal. A table (I) 
showing the averages for each dimension of that sex of each species 
is appended, and from the comparison of its values, the table on 
Sexual Dimorphism (II) is obtained. 


De ee 


sr ‘ 
—— 


SEXUAL DIMORPHISM 167 


~ITI.—RESULTS. 
(a.) Conclusions. 


In more condensed form the results given in the tables may Le 
expressed as follows. 

1. Males of Pleurobema, Elliptio, Symphynota, and Propiero 
possess a greater height and degree of inflation-than females and are 
relatively shorter. The females of Fusconaja, Amblema, Eurynia, 
L. luteola, and L. ovata show oppostte characiers tn this res pect to those 

_ of females representing the first four named species. Also in the fore- 
going, height correlates with the degree of inflation of the shell. Males 
‘of Anodonta, Anodontoides while having a greater degree of inflation 
than females, have a less height. 

2. Males of Ellipiio, Anodonta, Paraptera, Anodontoides, Eurynia 
and L. ovata have a relatively greater length of the posterior part of the 
shell, and consequently less of the anterior. In the remaining shells 
this condition ts reversed. 

3. The one outstanding morphological feature associated to prepon- 
derating extent with maleness in the Najades dealt with, was the 
greater length of posterior hynge line, (the anterior seems besi developed 
in the females). These facts correlate wiih values for anterior .and 
posterior length in % the species only. 

4. Thickness of shell, as associated with sex, seems to be as equally 
indifferent as all the other dimensions, (with the exception of those of 
the hinge lines). 


(b.) Remarks. 


There is now given from Simpson, (6), Walker, (8), Utterback, 

(7), all descriptive material of the external morphology of these 

_ shells usually held to be associated with the different sexes. As a 
rule, emphasis is placed on Walker’s late work, and it is the writer’s 
desire to show the relation of this material to the results he has 
obtained. : 

Utterback believed females of Fusconaja and Symphynota to 
possess a greater degree of inflation of the shell. My results check 
only with the former in this respect. We must pass over the other 
species listed in the order given (for the reason that there seems 
to be no accredited descriptive. material concerning their Sexual 
Dimorphism), until we come to Paraptera. 

Simpson: Paraptera. ‘‘Female and male much alike, former 
sometimes a little rhomboid or again it ends in a wide rounded point 


nae THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 
“TABLE II. 
SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN NAYADES. 
BS DS . 


- . . . D . . . 
(Dextro-sinistral diameter T oF convexity of valve divided 


by length giving degree of infiglion) ‘ 


Male Greater this ; No. spec. meas- | Female Greater this 
Respect in ured of each { Respect in 


Pleurobema coccineum 15 Dre Fusconajo flava 
Elliptia dilatatus 15 19 Amblema plicata . 
Symphynota costata 5 ag Eurynia recta oA 
Anodonta grandis 8 94 Lampsilis luteola 
Paraptera fragilis 5 84 Lampsilis ovata 
Proptera alata 6 
Anadontoides ferussacianus 3 
DVD 


(Dorso-ventral diameter of t Value divided by length 
giving relative height.) 


Male Greater this No. spec. meas- | Female Greater this 
Respect in ured of each Respect in 
Pleurobema 15 27 Fusconaja 
Symphynota 5 teal eR Amblema : 
Elliptio ae 8 Anodonta 
Proptera ean 5 |# Paraptera 
Eurynia 33 8 Anodontoides 
94 L. luteola : 
e 84 - 1, ovata 


: wien PD, : ; : 
(Distance posterior to extremity ais from aline passing through median dor- 


sal plane of valve expressing relative;degree posterior development. shell.) 


Male Greater this No. spec. meas- | Female Greater this ie 
Respect in ured of each Respect in i 
Elliptio 15 27 Fusconaja 
Anodonta 8 19 Amblema — 
Paraptera 5 15 Pleurobema 
Anodontoides 3 5 Symphynota 
Eurynia 33 6 Proptera 
L. ovata 84 94 L. lutedla 


(Distance anterior to extremity — from a line passing through median dor- 
sal plane of valve expressing relative degree anterior development shell.) 


Male Greater this No. spec. meas- | Female Greater this 
Respect in 5 ured of each Respect in 


L. luteola 94 84 L. ovata 


Fusconaja 27 15 Elliptio ; 
Amblema 19 8 Anodonta } 
Pleurobema 15 5 Paraptera ‘4 
Symphynota ~ 5 3 Anadontoides ~ 7 
Proptera 6 33 Eurynia | 


SEXUAL DIMORPHISM, 169 


(Length of shell compared cae with that of posterior hinge line.) 


Male Greater this No. spec. meas- | Female Greater this 
Respect in ured of each Respect in 


--Fusconaja | 27 poe | Symphynota 
 Amblema_- 19 6 | Proptera 
_Pleurobema 15 5 | Paraptera 
Elliptio ! 15 | | 
Anodonta 8 | 
Anodontoides 3 | 
Eurynia 33 
L. luteola 94 
L. ovata ‘ 84 


(Length of shell compared ANI with that of anterior hinge line.) 
it 


Male Greater this No. spec. meas- Female Greater this 
Respect in ured of each Respect in 

Symphynota | 5 27, Fusconaja 
Proptera " | 6 | 19 Amblema 
Paraptera | 5 15 Pleurobema 

| cies | Elliptio 

| 8 _ Anodonta 

| 3 | Anodontoides 

| 33 | Eurynia 

94 | UL. luteola 
| 84 | L. ovata 


(Thickness of shell divided Bee by dorso-ventral diameter.) 


Male Greater this No. spec. meas- Female Greater this 
Respect in ured of each Respect in Rat 2, 

Pleurobema | 15 2 | Fusconaja 

Elliptio | 8 |» 19 | Amblema 

Anodonta = | 8 5 | Symphynota 

Proptera | 6 | 5 | Paraptera 

Anodontoides ie ogiis.f. -Om -L. luteola 

Eurynia | 33 | 

L. ovata | 84 | 


about in the median line. Female shell a little fuller and more 
rounded in the post-basal region.’’ Specimens of Paraptera were 
not abundant, but if in this species ‘‘rhomboidal’’ may generally 
imply a greater height compared with the length, there is some 
agreement on the part of my results. Inflation of the post-basal 
region was not measured. 
Propiera: ‘‘Female shell with long rounded marsupial swelling 
at extreme post-basal part, generally sub-truncate behind. Male 
shell less full in post basal region, nearly rounded behind.” My 


170 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


observations do not agree with calculations from Walker’s illustra- 
tion of this species which shows the female to be relatively higher. 
They do agree in assigning the female a greater posterior length 
of shell. 

Eurynia: ‘Male shell drawn out behind and ends in a blunt 
point about midway up from the base. Female shell has long 
rounded marsupial swelling, ending in a blunt point 24 way up from 
the base.’’ This data agrees with my measurements, as it may_be © 
inferred the male is longer, the marsupial swelling may be in 
evidence from the inflation of the shell at the point measured. 

L. luteola: ‘‘Female shell with most decided marsupial swelling; 
here blunt:posterior point is somewhat higher up, (#), of height 
than that of male, (about halfway), and is usually more inflated.” 
' My results show the female as a higher degree of inflation, and is 
besides relatively longer. 

L. ovata: ‘‘Female shell slightly inflated post-basal region,” 
etc. As the recorded dimorphism for this genus is practically the 
same as for these last 2 species, I need only point out the full accord 
with my results. : 

The value of quantitative studies of the morphological charac- 
teristics of shells is best appreciated when cases are brought back 
. to mind where new genera and species had to be founded on the 
anatomy of soft parts alone so great was the superficial resem- 
blance in some cases between what turn out to be entirely different 
animals. If asa general proposition, it be admitted that the system- 
atist should be able to find in any organism specific characters 
' distributed from the most minute anatomy to the coarsest features 
of morphology, any such convergent phenomena as described above 
could be eleminated as each species of shell could be expected to 
vary in morphological characters around its own mean. It is to 
be hoped that the practice of publishing the more usual dimensions 
for both sexes of shells will be continued, that the ultimate philo- 
sophic trend of all Biological Science may have ample data for the 
consideration of the never-dying and always-puzzling question 
of the environment. 


(c.) Source of Error. 

Paucity of material compelled me to use in some species a few 
shells from Lake Erie, (most were from the Upper Ohio Drainage), . : 
although it is in some of the measured shell characteristics, as I 
expect to show, that the Lake Erie shells differ from those of the 


SEXUAL DIMORPHISM 171 


_ Upper Ohio. I do not feel, however, that the value of my conclus- 

ions is greatly impaired thereby, as an equal number of shells of 
_ both sexes from Lake Erie was included when this had to be done. 
Besides the reduction to factors apparently expresses the relative 
_ proportion of the part concerned, and, by the law of averages, 

possibly evens up any great differences. 
; 
IV.—BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


x. Grier, N. M. “Morphological Features of Certain Mussel Shells 
of L. Erie Compared with Corresponding Ones of the Upper Ohio Drain- 
age.” Annals Carnegie Museum, 1920. : : 

2. Hazy, J. ‘‘Die Mollusken Fauna von Budapest,” III Biologischer 
Theil, Malakozoologischer Blatter, 1881, p. 160, 161, 173. 

3. Israel, W. von. ‘“‘Die Najadeen des Weidegebietes, etc.’’ Beilage 
zum Nachrichsblatt der Deutsschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft, N. 4, 
IQIO, Pp. 4. ; ; ; 

4. Ortmann, A. E. ‘‘Monograph Najades of Pennsylvania,’’ Mem. 
Car. Museum, III, rort. - 

5. Ortmann, A. E. ‘‘Notes on Family and Genera of Najades.’’ Ann. 
Carnegie Museum, VIII, rgor2. 

6. Simpson, C. S. “A Descriptive Catalogue of the Najades.’’ B. 
Walker, Detroit, 1914. 

7. Utterback, W. I. ‘‘Naides of Missouri,’’ Amer. Mid. Naturalist, 
‘Vol. III, 1916. 

8. Walker, Bryant. ‘‘A Synopsis of the Classification of Fresh Water 
Mollusca of N. America, North of Mexico, etc.’’ University of Michigan, 
Mus. Zoology Pub. No. 6, p. 171, 1918. 


, 


TABLE I. 


GIVING AVERAGE DIMENSIONS OF MALE 
AND FEMALE SHELLS. 


NO. DSD DVD PD AD PHL AHL TH. 


SPECIMENS es ai oa Pe L I B L ri) DVD 
27 Fusconaja flava 9 .5294 .7756 .7749 .2315 -.4867 .2499 .119 
27 Fusconaja flava CO .4838 .7710 .7550 .2308 .544 .2001 .1181 
19 Amblema plicata O% 24097. 710) _ .806 2408. = 574". 184 1398 
19 Amblema plicata O) AZT 7680: (813.18 92°) 55657-1284. 1699 


15 Pleurobema obliquumcoc @ .436 .796 .845 .1552 .594 .1987 -43 
15 Pleurobema obliquumcoc o& .442 .821 G7 Se 2A 5575 21973 o2r7 


15 Elliptio dilatatus 
15 Elliptio dilatatus 


2O7 A044 37 74.211 5°. 509.1830 2 
304 .505 .796 .2026 .544 .1615 322 


e) 
of 
5 Symphynota costata Q@ .260 .566 .744 .256. .490 .1924 .24 
5 Symphynota costata Oi. 2i07-8. OO 729 270 OT. e253 .26 


: 
_ 
a 
Pp. 
, 
a « 


172 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST > 


8 Anodonto grandis fo Mcaiatrtc fy he Malas Or iter A ones? fy omy Wl Golmee eA aT eK Oo vs 
8 Anodonto grandis Oo 38382... 56R @ 1700! 288) G410 42437 Gor 
3 Anodontoides ferussac O43 73. 25 AG + 2703) 2.300 pase. BAe .40 
3 Anodontoides ferussac P57 LAS LS") 2754 eas azole. Teo aa 
5 Paraptera fragilis O GE S5 SSL Y LGA eee 2OOr sFOeeEe OO .10 
5 Paraptera fragilis S -3904--'.696° ..737 4,267 2.401 2205. 0 
6 Proptera alata 9 261 ° 775 (684 ~ .415°.530. .2TO .34 
6 Proptera alata OS 9 Ste 825.- 870s L2G 2am sO dveamiey 219 
33 Eurynia recta O2 52740 Seale 7774 32220 5-540 2. Loma 55 
33 Eurynia recta Oo .2703 .4177  .798 .207. .560 .1616 .28 
94 Lampsilis luteola Q .4027 .6036 .7603 .2739 .5184 .2478 .38 
94 Lampsilis luteola & .3708 .5617 .7319 .2593 .4878 .2191 .38 
84 Lampsilis ovata vent. Q .4780 .7375 .6885 .3105 .4490 .2314 39° 
84 Lampsilis ovata vent. O'. 246604 )3716"* 2706; 91207 vasa 5 23 LO 38 


Hollins College, Hollins, Va.” 


The Prairie Mirage. 


BY HOWARD C. BROWN. 
Strange is it indeed, that to so many persons who have spent their 
lives upon the prairie, a mirage is something which is far distant; 
a thing entirely unrelated to their life. Many persons associate the 
mirage only with the desert. This seems odd enough when one 
considers the many beautiful mirages which appear in the prairie 
skies when a reflected grass area seems only a further extension of 
the vast, real stretch, which, in great, gentle waves of ‘Fitanic 
magnitude, roll, of a prairie morning, in undulating green, wind 
responsiveness, under the lifting sun. Few things can inspire one 
with more sincere thoughts of the greatness of the universe, than 
can the wide stretches of prairie of our land. And the mirages are 
interesting to me in that they were often so thoroughly linked, in 
the past, with the life of the pioneer. i 
If he loved beauty, the pioneer never ceased to revel in those 
wondrous reflections. But the mirage was not alone a thing of 
beauty. If it mirrored an enemy’s camp, in time of hostilities, 
it served a utilitarian purpose. But to those who did not love it 
for its beauty, and for whom it served no real purpose, still it became 


ne 


= 

ia - 

* a 
> Pp 
C 
~ 
4 
Py 
a 
= 
= 
oo 
~ 
7 
- 
: 
_ 
4 
4 
a 


THE PRAIRIE MIRAGE 173 


an object of wonder, and they never ceased to marvel at the unusual 
phenomenon. 

Mrs. Maude A. Fenton, a member of the California Natural- 
ist Club, is a thorough lover of beauty. For a number of years 
she lived near Indian Head, Canada. Writing of those years, 
she said that her most pleasant memories of Canada were centered 
about her enjoyment of the wild flowers, the northern lights, and 
the mirages. Speaking of the last mentioned, she says, ‘“‘Situated 
some seven miles from Indian Head, was the Squirrel Hill, at the 
foot of which was a very large spring of water. From it the town 
of Indian Head had its water piped to the town. One bright, 
frosty morning in the spring of 1907, we noticed what we thought 
to be about half a mile away, this hill with.all the trees, hollows 
and the place where the spring was, showing quite plainly. Ou 
speaking to others about it, they said, ‘Yes, but you saw the hill 
when the mirage was on, for it is over seven miles away.” 

‘Another time in November, 1908, one bright, clear moruing 
I thought that some one had been moving a house and left it in the 
corner of the pasture land, about one-fourth of a mile away. Both 
Mr. Fenton and I were deceived into thinking that it was a real 
house which had been moved during the night, for we knew that 
it had not been there the day before. On closer examination we 
found it to be our neighbor’s house some two miles away, to the 
north-east. It stayed there about:two hours, and then gradually 
faded away, back to the place where it belonged. 

“During the same winter, we had the chance of seeing the most 
beautiful one of all, the Katepwa valley. This valley is situated 
some fourteen miles from Indian Head, and sixteen miles from 
where we lived. Lake Katepwa is in the center of this valley, and 
surrounding it are quite high hills with trees, shrubbery, hollows 
and roads: Also, a few houses. Snow was on the ground. As we 
had been there a couple of times it did not take us long to name 
the place. It looked very natural. This was brought to our view 
about a mile away. The Hills lay to the south-west of us, the 
house to the north-east, and the valley north-west, and every- 
thing showed right side up.. These mirages always occurred in 
the morning, just about sunrise. We uever saw one in the 
evening.” 

One of the most interesting references to the prairie mirage 
which I have yet found, is in J. W. Winkley’s ‘“‘ John Brown, the 


174 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Hero.” He tells about a horseman who had been riding full speed 
up the creek, one morning in 1856, and who stopped at their 
cabin door. The horseman brought news that the Ruffians were 
over the border, upon them again, in strong force. He was a 
messenger from the Middle River region, and had been dispatched ~ 
to them by his comrades in distress. His mission was, of course, 
to secure help. The need was urgent. ‘Then there comes the 
description of the mirage, ‘“‘As the speaker drew his narration to 
a close, all present instinctively turned their eyes in the direction 
whence he had come: namely, toward the south-east. There a . 
sight met our gaze that riveted us to the spot—a spectacle as 
marvelous as it was beautiful, and singularly confirmatory of our 
informer’s words. To our utter astozishment we looked directly 
at that moment into the enemy’s camp twenty miles away, though 
seerringly less than a quarter of that distance. It was one of those 
peculiar phenomena, rarely seen on the water and less frequently 
on the land, and more wonderful in the latter case when it does 
thus appear, because the more perfect and on a grander scale: 
the mirage.”’ 

‘“The prairie mirage is of wondrous beauty. It is usually in the’ 
autumn, when all the atmospheric conditions are favorable, that 
these strange illusions take place on the prairie ocean. Along the 
eastetn horizon, near sunrise, a narrow belt of silver light appears. 
As it grows broader the silvery gray of its lower side changes 
slightly golden. Fleecy clouds above the belt take on a yellow red. 
The grayish shadows of the dawn lift slowly from the earth. Just 
before the red disk of the sun peers above the horizon-line, one 
sees in the sky the landscape of trees, of waving grasses or grain, 
or rocks and hills, held together as it were by threads of yellow and 
gray and azure. The earth stands inverted in the air. 

“The groundwork of this illusion is grayish, semi-opaque mist; 
and the objects are seen standing or moving along in it. The feet 
of animals and of men, the trunks of trees, the rocks and hillocks, 
are set in this aqueous soil. When the conditions are perfect, 
objects far beyond the range of vision over the prairie are brought 
near and into plain view of the beholder. 

“That morning was such a time and afforded such a scene. 
There was the camp of the enemy,—miles away, as has been said,— 
mirrored perfectly and beautifully on the sky, every feature of it 
traced with the minuteness of a line-engraving. By the aid of our 


THE PRAIRIE MIRAGE 175 


military field-glass we could see the early risers moving through 
the campground; the horses standing patiently outside awaiting 
their morning meal; the positions of the pickets keeping guard; 
the tent doors flapping in the slight breeze or swaying back and 
forth as the men made egress or entrance. Even the curling smoke 
of the newly kindled flame, as it ascended upward, curiously 
traced itself visibly to the eye.”’ 

I was greatly interested in the mirages of which Iowan early 
settlers have told. And I wanted to know also, how far the 
mirage could be seen. In answer to my inquiries, Mr. Clement L. 
Webster, who has for years been collecting pioneer data, writes, 
‘“‘T do not just as this moment recall of my having personally seen 
one of the mirages in this part of the west (Iowa) but I recall the 
description which some of the old settlers have given to them, 
which they saw in the north-central part, and north-west parts of 
Towa, in the very early days. As they described them to me, they 
must have been reflections of the South Dakota prairies. I was 
very familiar with mirages in the south-west.” 

One of the most recent mirages of the north-central Iowa 
region, of which I have any record, was one which was seen at 
Charles City, lowa, by Mrs. Mary Dutton. ‘‘It was November 29th, 
1918, or there about, that I saw this reflection,” writes Mrs. Dutton. 
‘‘T hastily threw a shawl about my shoulders and stood alone in the 
dingy light of the old attic, in the cold, for one and a half hours, 
wrapped in awe. I did not realize that time was passing, until my 
mother became alarmed at my long absence. I found that to view 
it from the ground gave a distinctly different impression. Our 
house is on a hill and from the third story window I got the best 
view. The clouds seemed to change and form different angles when 
I got up stairs. The heavens, for the entire circle around was 
beautifully colored with stripings of pink and green, seemed to 
glow. This alone was most beautiful. At the movies when they 
run the pictures and adds so that they appear liks kaleidoscopic 
bits of color or form, and then seem to slide unbidden to position, 
until the picture desired has materialized, you have an eifect which 
is not unlike that which is witnessed at the beginning of the reflec- 
tion. All of the arrangements of cloud and color were finally 
produced,.and the almost perfect reflection was displayed. It 
remained for analysis and comprehension for some time, practically 
unchanged, making recognition quite certain, and not allowing 


176 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


chance for imagination, in a chance cloud formation. The sun was 
setting in that great blaze of subdued red, and was farther west 


than the mirage. The clouds which bore the mirage hung unsus- 


pended to the south and between us and the horizon, which held 
yet another bank of strangely shaped, gray clouds. As to the 
details of the mirage, I know that it was the Mississippi blu‘ts 
which I saw reflected. There was the main river, the further bank 
being indistinct, but the blu‘ts on this side were very plain. And 
yet towards me from the river, was an inlet or a back water pond, 
that was very distinct. gS shore line of this showed a boulder 
in the edge of the water.’ 

The Mississippi blu‘fs are fully one-hundred miles distant 
from Charles City, where the mirage appeared. The same aight 
that this appeared, I had noticed the wondrous colors of the sky, 
and had telephoned Mrs. Dutton to watch them. But they were 
going so very fast, that by the time I got back to my observation 
post, I did not see the same thing which I had phoned about. Then 
I was busied, and ceased in my watch. And it was apparently at 
that time that the real mirage began to shape itself. 

There is no river the size of the Mississippi and with the 
bluifs margining it, any place near Charles City. It is a long way 
for a reflection to carry, but the vivid description-which has been 


given is one of the most interesting of those which I have thus far » 


found. The atmospheric conditions are such that the mirage might 
easily appear at that time. Most of the ones described have been 
in the early morning. This was just as the sun was setting. If the 
sun had dropped below the horizon, then its last rays might have 
been spent in illuminating just such a reflection as this. The 
distinct manner of the reflection considering the distance, is one 
of the most unusual characters of it. 

There is-much to be learned about the prairie mirage. Many 
persons could add information concerning it, which would be of 
value to the collector of data on our natural phenomena. I have 
collected here some references which I have had of the mirage. 
There is much which is now waiting to be collected. The lips of 
the old settlers yet mumble the stories of the early days. But the 
mumbling will cease e’er long, and then we will not have the 
records which we should most carefully have collected. Let us 
then get to work and secure these records before it is too late. All 
that deals with the early life of the pioneer is sacred to the memory 


+ 
, 


heresy hele .é 


. 


Sales hae 


i oa 


ME me TEA 


AIST 


BIRD NESTS FOUND AT SPRING LODGE 177 


of the men who'live after him. The mirage is only one thing which 
entered into his life. He was intoxicated at times with the beauty 
and stunned with the wonder of it. Let us too infuse into our 


- beings some of the wonder and beauty which maintained the 


pioneer. 


Bird Nests Found at Spring Ledge in 1919. 


BY FRANK C, EVANS. 


I have just completed a record of the bird nests found at Spring 
Ledge, near Crawfordsville, Indiana, during the past summer, and 
I thought perhaps the readers of the American Midland Naturalist 
might be interested in the result. I located 146 nests on the grounds, 
and. since the leaves have fallen, have found several others; but 
these are not included in the record. There were twenty-six species - 
as follows :— 


(Green Herons 2 so Ee ee RE ho ee ee Ene ae 4 
PG ia: er SE ace eR | LOS” SDATROMNE EL aw Kes Baie ee See I 
Baltimore Oriole... gw Orchard (Ongle ct’ s.0 0G boo i 
OUSee When. oo 2 ea a pr 14 Cuckoo, Yellow-billed_.__.........3 

vo Wome. Dove oo 0 oat rane \Warbling.= Vareo 6 Sel a ye 3 
Brown Lhrasher 29. eye ah Chek of bets kp eae aNd Mees Be ree 3 
LegboVe) oysc's | ORR eae Se NOONE ie Vo 6. (Chimney: Swift 2226 Ses ek 2 
Chipping "Sparrow ee poms) © lbh 0b ca Cpot a] oy ba 6 Chai) nee ea el ea ga 2 
Red-headed Woodpecker.......... ou Wea dow lane ie one ee 6 
Parnple Wa ntines- ie 22 Se 38 Maryland Yellow-throat_._.___.. I 
BUN CES) IF ty etm Sree tte cle saa Pee Oe 1 Red-winged Blackbird... 3 
Rairerartl et nt re. ett eerie fe aenaritds: 4 eee ee 2 
PHO ED eter an et Ae ae Say 2.) Crested: Flycatcher. 2. 3 I 


I put up sixty-six nesting boxes and shelves—fifty-five boxes and 
eleven shelves. Twenty-eight boxes were used. Six of the boxes 
were used twice, and three, three times. Twenty-seven boxes were 
not used. Eight of these were in the immediate vicinity of a sparrow 
hawk’s nest, which I think account for their. not being occupied. 
Of the eleven shelter shelves, five were used, all by robins. 

Our Martin colony was considerably larger this year, and was a 
source of continual delight throughout the summer. Among our . 
prized nests was a hummingbird’s, situated on a limb about six 
feet above a large spring. If I had been permitted to select the lo- 
cation, I could not have picked a more picturesque spot. It was a 


# 


178 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


perfect jewel of a nest. We watched the mother bird throughout a 
the period of incubation, and especially enjoyed seeing her feed her 


baby, bird—only one of the two eggs hatched. I also found a 
perfect humming bird’s nest under a tree, which had evidently been 
blown from the limb; so we really think we had two hummingbirds’ 
nests, but have no record of one of them. 


I shall never again permitasparrow hawk to neston the grounds. I 


am sure he drove many birds away, for often I would observe him 
perched in the top of a tall oak tree, and suddenly dart like an 
arrow for smaller birds that happened to alight in his vicinity. 


Besides, none of the nesting boxes near the sparrow hawk’s nest _ 


‘were occupied. ) 

We did not locate a cardinal’s nest this year, although the grounds 
were full of them nearly all the time. I know they were nesting 
nearby, but we were unable to find the nests... 

I wish everyone could appreciate the great returns in pleasure 
and satisfaction in protecting and attracting the song birds to their 
home grounds Certainly no other investment brings greater 
returns. 


2 J 

By 
- 

y 

» 

’ 


. Contributions on general and midland natural 
history will be gladly received. Papers on botany 
and allied subjects, zoology, geology and _ physical 
geography, should be addressed to the editor. 

Matters relating to advertisements are to be 
taken up with the secretary of the University. 

One hundred reprints of articles: averaging 
eight pages or more will be furnished free of charge 
to contributors. More than one hundred separates can 
be obtained at cost price of the extras.. When articles 
consist of less than eight pages, a certain number 
of copies of THE AMERICAN. MIDLAND. NATURALIST in 
which the paper appeared will be supplied free, or 
the separate articles may, by arrangement with the 
editor, be kept until future papers average eight pages, 
provided the contributions are sent in for the next 
consecutive issue for publication. Contributors of 
articles will receive a free subscription for the year 
in which their paper appears. For further or’ other. 
information address : 

THE Epitror, Notre Dame, Indiana 


URS 


—_ 


hee a 
=a 


oe 
ml) 


BP Dy ee Sa is es t A” : = eo 


<a 


he 


RES RS Es SR ae eee 
Se Ra ae nen oan Se 


a 


a es Sh 


——} 
Lh ae 


LI SL SR SL A LS ET RRR 


The oe 
Gniversity of Notre Dame 


NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


Ve 


College of Arts and Letters. 


Departments of Ancient Classics, 


College of Engineering. 
Departments of Civil Engineering, 


Modern Literature, History, Mechanical Engineering, 
Political Economy, Sociology, Electrical Engineering, Chemical 
Domestic Commerce, Foreign Engineering, Mining Engineering, 
Commerce, Journalism, Library Industrial Engineering. 
Science. 


: College of Science. 


Departments of Chemistry, College of Laty. 

Physics, . Biology, ‘Pharmacy, 

Agriculture. Colle e of Fine Arts. 
College of Architecture. Departments of Artistic Drawing, 

Departments \ of Construction, Painting, Cartooning, Instrumental 


Design. Music, Vocal Music. 


c 


- St. Coward Hall. 


For Young Boys. 


Preparatory School. 


Variant Courses. 


Notre’ Dame is recognized by all educators, by the press and 
by the public as a college whose work is of the same grade as 
that of the most highly endowed colleges or the best state uniy- 
sities. Its atmosphere is strongly Catholic and no young man who 
has ever attended the University of Notre Dame can escape its 
influence in after life. 


| 
| 
, 


The discipline is paternal, and aims at giving young men the 
fullest liberty consistent with earnest study and manly Christian 


character. Rooms at reasonable rates. Catalogue sent on 
application. 
fu 
Address: 
THERE GIT Sst REAR 
NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


eects acs le il 


car. 


ih 


“a 
ca) < 
: | 
af 
ay 


sie 


Fr 


wes 
iN 


ps DT yee 
fae Ue © RSET Se 


; MAY, 1920 


wi, MIDLAND 


Devoted to Natural History, Primarily ~ 
that of the Prairie States 


Published by the University of Notre Dame, 


Notre Dame, Indiana 


J. A. NIEUWLAND, C.S.C., Ph. D., Sc. D., Editor 


CONTENTS 


The Hackberry Stage of the Upper Devonian. (Plate I.) 
Carroll Lane Fenton 


A Consideration of Certain Genera Proposed by Ehrhart 
Homer D. House 


- Birds Observed at Notre Dame, Indiana, in the Fall of 1919 


Brother Alphonsus, C. S.C. 


PRICE $1.50 A YEAR 
FOREIGN, 6s. 6d. 


NATURALIST 


cTnithsenian inegpm 


200 


208 


SINGLE NUMBERS 30 CENTS 


Entered as second-class matter at Notre Dame, Indiana, -Acceptance for mailing at special 


rate of postage provided for in section 1103, Act of October 3, 1917, 
authorized on July 3, 1918. 


THE UNIVERSITY PRESS, NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


i oe Tt) Ne 7) La ek oes Fey SS Te ieee, aie al ay oe 


oP a at uP i \ if WH ! My Ne te a 
ma 
Back Numbers of “The Aegan Wiad Naturalis.” " 
Vol. I.—(1909-1910) 293 Pp: Unbound... CN READ Tite LEME PATS WE Rat ie eae ; 
Vol, II.—(1911- 1912). 330 Pp. Unbound and EE of 3 Ripnate 
to: be bound in-end of vole i ee ee aia Ba 2: -00 
Inclusive of Three Reprints (see below). Extras aC eE wae Md The 
‘Vol. III. —(1913-1914). 383 pp.. Unbound, exclusive of Reprint No. 4. 
(See below). [Nos. 1, 2, 3, 7.) are scarce and nearly out of print, 
costing 50 cts. 1.8 1 Heat eae ent eonaey a ean Se ee nae mn oe ee 4.50. 
Incliisive of Reprint No. 4, extra... Sats Mb Soa ss 1.00 
Vol AV (TOI §=19716). Unbound oN Vt ce ee ee ade bee Ss ed 4.00 


Mal: Wi (ro 171.908), Unbound...) 4 eo. ye eh ae OG 


; “Total$ 17.75 


Publications. 
HAHN, Ww. Analytic Study of Faunal Changes in Indiana, 2 plates, 
TOKO, ,.27pp-%-d0-k et ER ae Wika ts es Ess Fe tS ens 
GREENE, E. L. Leaflets of Botanical Observation. and Criticism. 
2 vols » Complete: (1903-1912).-.02--2-.----1-+----x---/ 6.00 
Ke on Cybele Columbiana, A series of Studies in Botany, aes 
chiefly North American. No. 1, (Other num- ey 
bersto follaw) tic eee te a eh ae emt 
a) se Pittonia, A series of Papers Realting to Botany and i € 
‘Botanists, 5 vols. (1887—1905).2..--2us a 14,00. 
es ” Flora Franciscana, Parts I, II, III. [Part IV pub- 


lished long after’ the other parts, is quite 
unobtainable, as all copies not immediately 
distributed seem to have been lost in the San 


Francisco fire.] Price as published_.......-.....--.-- 2.00) 
“if ’”” Manual of the Botany of the Region of San Fran- 
cisco Bay (1894). Bound cloths Nee Nie 20015 
TU DOU The Peg a Aare Ne ANE SEE) Bocas 1.50. 
| (Price as published of latter) 22220020. 2.00 
UTTERBACK, W. I. Naiades of Missouri, 200 pp. 29 pl. and some text, 
FIG TI ESS SA Ps Pe Be a a as 1.75 


Reprints. 


RAFINESOUE, C'S. ¥ Neogenyton; (825) at ie ee a ee Sra 26 
et 4 The Natural Family of the Carexides (1840)........ .50 

* Scadiography or too Genera of Ombelliferous 
Phintsyete.A(1 S40) sete 1.50 


Monographie des Coquilles Bivalves et Fluvia- 
tiles de la Riviere Ohio. Remarques sur les 
Rapports Naturels des Genres Viscum, Samolus 
et Viburnum. A Bruxelles (1820).--...22...222-2-.-- 1.50 
LEConTE, J. B. Reprints of Monographs without plates, $2.50; with 
42 photographic copies of unpublished plates 
(7x8), $25.00; with colored photographic plates...$37.50 
LeContTE, J. E. Two extra plates reproduced from originals in N. Y. 
Bot. Garden. Colored, $1.50; uncolored-......-....2. 1.0C 


‘sn[e} Atioqyovpy Aq pasaAoo Ajjsour ‘a8v ppoyoys Jo viv Jooj Ob JaMO] OY, ‘sayeys 
Allaqyvey B8uleq jJoaj gf roddn 9y} ‘YyS1y Joo} 94 Jnoqe st a1ay JUsMIdIvdSa DY, *a8e}S 
Al19qYVH IY} JO vinsodxa adA} ay} ‘Yuvg Av[D aAoig Assoqyovy, jo uorsod ysvy 


AOVLS AMMAAAOVH AHL NO NOLNHA— I] ALVTd 


a — 


‘ 


The American Midland Naturalist 


PUBLISHED BI-MONTHLY BY THE UNIVERSITY 
OF NOTRE DAME, NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


VOL. VI. MAY, 1920. A aNe NO. 9 


The Hackberry Stage of the Upper Devonian” 


BY CARROLL LANE FENTON. JUN 


I.—INTRODUCTORY. “tional Me 
At what is commonly known as the Hackberry Grove Clay 
Bank, in section 35, Portland Township, Cerro Gordo County, 
Iowa, is the type locality of the formation described in this paper. 
. On the right bank of Lime Creek at that point is an escarpment 
some seventy-five feet in height which is composed throughout its 
exposed thickness of the rocks of two formations: the Hackberry 
and the Sheffield.t These two formations comprise the ‘‘ Lime Creek 
Stage’’ as defined by Calvin,? but it is recognized, and was recognized 
prior to Calvin’s description, that the two formations are distinct. 
The nomenclature of these two formations had been considerably 
involved, as has also been the assignment of geologic age. Hall, in 
18583 assigned the beds of the Hackberry to the Hamilton Stage, 
but in a later paper by Hall and Whitfield4 they were considered 
as being Chemung. Whites referred the Hackberry shales to the 
Hamilton, and H. S. Williams attempted at one time to show that 
they were of Mississippian age,® but later? corrected this. C. L. 
Webster, in 1889,° referred the Hackberry to the upper Devonian, 
but placed the subjacent shales in the Hamilton, but has corrected 


‘Am. Jour. Sci. (4), XLVIII, pp. 355-376. 

?Ta. Geol. Surv. VII, pp. 161-192. 

3Geol. of Iowa; Vol. I; pts. 1 and 2. 

4 Twenty-third Ann. Rep’t, N. Y. State Cabinet, pp. 225-226. 

5Rep’t of Geol. Surv. of State of Iowa, Vol. 1, pp. 187-188; Vol. 2, 
Pp. 252-253. 

6Am. Jour. Sci. (3) ,XXV, pp. 97-104. 

Moe. (Cit. plist: 

8 Am. Nat. XXIII, pp. 229-243. 


180 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


the latter error in later papers. By the Iowa Survey the ‘Lime 
Creek’”’ has been consistently and correctly assigned to the upper 
Devonian. In a recent paper by myself,‘ Webster and I referred 
the shales below the Hackberry to a possible Genesee time equiva- 
lency; in 1919? I applied the name Sheffield to these shales, but 
expressed no opinion as to their age except that they are of the 
late upper Devonian. 

Webster, in 1889, in a paper on the Devonian of Iowa, divided 
it into three stages, the Corniferous, the Hamilton, and the Hack- 
berry. His Hackberry Group was stated by him to consist of one 
formation which ‘‘is known to attain a thickness of forty-five feet, 
and is made up, for the greater part, of a yellowish brown argil- 
laceous, and sometimes arenaceous shaley limestone.’’ This forma- 
tion was stated to be the highest Devonian in the state, and, while 
the description leaves much to be desired, there is no doubt that 
Webster’s Hackberry Group, as originally described by him, 
includes all of the Devonian rocks above the blue shale at Hack- 
berry Grove, Rockford, and other localities, and below the Kinder- 
hook. 

Prior to 1889 the names ‘‘Rockford Shales,” ‘‘Lime Creek 
Shales,’’ and ‘“‘ Lime Creek Beds’’ had been used by various authors. 
Calvin and Williams used all three interchangeably; Webster 
used the term ‘‘ Rockford Shales.’’ This name, however, was pre- 
occupied by another formation, so had to be abandoned. 

In 18973 Calvin, in his report on the geology of Cerro Gordo 
County described the shales and limestones above what was then 
considered to be the Cedar Valley Limestone‘ as the Lime Creek 
Stage, and this name has been used in the Iowa reports, and is 
more widely known than the name proposed by Webster. In 
1919,5 I discussed the nomenclature of the two formations in ques- 
tion, attempting to show that: (1) The name ‘“‘Lime Creek”’ 
as used by the Iowa Survey does not equal ‘“‘ Hackberry” as used 
by Webster and myself; (2) that a new formation name was needed 


Am? IMiid) Nat. Vi ap: s2nae 


2See Note 8, The division of the Devonian below the Hackberry into 
Hamilton and Corniferous was erroneous. 

3Ta. Geol. Surv. VII., pp. 161-170. 

4The Nora Limestone of Thomas (Science, N. S., XX XVII, p. 459 was 
not separated from the Cedar Valley limestones at that time. 

>Loc. cit. pp. 355-360. 


HACKBERRY STAGE OF THE UPPER DEVONIAN. 18i 


for the shales below the Hackberry, and (3), that the name “‘ Lime 
Creek’’ is not only unsuitable, but is preoccupied, and so should 
be dropped. 


Iowa Geological Survey Clement L. Webster C. L. Fenton 
(Published Reports) ah (Early Papers, 1889) | 


Owen Substage | Upper Horizon | Owen Substage 


Cerro Gordo Substage 


Middle Horizon Spirifer Zone 
Hackberry Ses ml he 
Substage Lower Horizon | Striatula Zone 
Genesee??? Sheffield 
Stage Formation 


Fic. 1.—CORRELATION oF NOMENCLATURES. 
II.— STRATIGRAPHY AND DISTRIBUTION. 


There is no point at which a satisfactory section of the Hackberry 
Stage may be taken. The following section, a compilation giving the 
maximum thicknesses observed, is here introduced in order to 
facilitate reference in the following description. 


II..A.—GENERAL SECTION OF THE HACKBERRY STAGE.! 


II.—Owen Substage. 

C.—Acervularia Zone. 
Calcareous, light gray limestones, containing Pachyphyllum, Alveolites, 
Acervularia (an undescribed species; typical of the zone) Stromato- 
porella, Syringosiroma, and other species, corals and Stromatoporoids 
Denies hthemoste auUunGanit) LOLMIS eo Se tee Bee Se Ns hed ae 20 

B.—WNaticopsis Zone. 
Magnesian shales and limestones, and argillaceous dolomitic limestones, ' 
usually dark buff or brownish in color. Gastropods the predominating - 
fossils, Westernia and Naticopsis the predominating genera; Naticopsis 
meanied La ccWweathe most-ty pical species: 2-1 we ae ee 30 

A.—Idiostroma Zone. 
Buff, gray-buff, or buff-brown limestones, heavily bedded. Crowded 
throughout by two species of Stromatoporoids(?) commonly referred 
to Idiosiroma, as well as other Siromatoporoida, and several species of 
PaASEGO POs eel ne Uo iu Sede ale ey ea Oe OLY SG TAA Suey SNARE 4-6% 

I.—Cerro Gordo Substage. 

B.—Spirifer Zone. 
Yellowish, very calcereous shales, shaley clays, and shaley limestones. 
Weathers partly to clay, partly to limestone chips. Abundantly fos_ 


‘For comparison with Calvin’s section in Ia. Geol. Sun. VII., p. 163. 


182 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Siler Os. eee 8 Oe ae cea eee eee AaNa CRN TS eA NOS ENS Zs 3. J 20 

A.—Striatula Zone. 

Calcareous shales and shaley limestones, slightly to very gritty. Weathers 

partly to a rather gritty clay, partly to chips and nodules, strongly 

iron stained. Beds indurated at various localities, as at Mason City; 

at Rockford and Hackberry Grove, bearing large numbers of calcareous 

concretions in the lower portions. Fossiliferous, the fossils occurring 

largely jas. Gas te. ee eee ia REE 52 ee Se 25 
Disconformity. 

At Rockford the Striatula zone attains a total thickness of 
above sixteen feet, and is separated into three quite distinct divi- 
sions. The lowest of these, about two feet in thickness, does not 
depend so much upon its fauna as the distinctive feature of a 
large number of calcareous concretions, containing considerable 
amounts of pyrite, and occasional crystals of feldspar. Fossils 
are conspicuous by their general absence, even poorly preserved 
casts being uncommon. 

The second division, (Whitneyi Faunule, Fig. 3), contains the 
typical Striatula fauna. The less common species of this faunule 
were described by Webster in a paper in the American Naturalist’; 
the most common ones are: Schizophoria striatula (Schloth.), 
A. reticularis (Linn.), A. hystrix Hall, and Spirifer whitney: Hall. 
The total thickness of the faunule is about ten feet. 

The third division, (Gypidula faunule, Fig. 3), is, to a considerable 
extent, a transition between the Striatula and the Spirifer zones. 
The fauna has lost its typical Striatula aspect, but yet it is suffi- 
ciently distinct from that of the Spirifer zone to be placed with 
the lower division. Among the typical Spirifer zone species appear- 
ing in this faunule are those marked by an asterisk in the faunal 
list. The most interesting of these is a large, undescribed species 
of Gypidula, commonly called G. comis (Owen). This form is, in 
general, rare throughout the formation, but in limited areas of 
the Gypidula faunule considerable numbers of specimens, usually 
badly crushed, may be found. I collected a total of thirteen speci- 
mens, only two of them good, from an area that could be covered 
by an ordinary sheet of paper. In the area having a radius of 
approximately fifteen feet about this find I have collected but four 
specimens, all fragmentary. 

The accompanying diagram will serve to show the division of 
the Striatula into faunules at the localities studied. The division, 


tAm. Nat: XCXII., pp. 1013-1018. 


HACKBERRY STAGE OF THE UPPER DEVONIAN. 183 


of course, is by no means so hard and fast as might be inferred from 
the diagram. The figures refer to the approximate thicknesses in 
feet. 


Hackberry Grove. Mason City N. W. States Rockford 
Bei& i Caz Cem. Co. | sey ee Or 
4| Reticularis 
Faunule. — — = 
= -—|—_|——_——_ -—-|3 | Gypidula 
——— 8| Gritty, soft Faunule. 
8| Whitneyi 18|Fucoid beds; few = — 
Faunule(?) 20} + Faunule. fossils. 12| Whitneyi 
aS — = -—— Faunule 
2| Concretionary %| Fucoid <= ~————-—— 
Bed Faunule 2| Concretionary 
: ; Bed 


Fic. 3.— FAUNULES OF THE STRIATULA ZONE. 


THE CERRO GORDO SUBSTAGE. 
II. B.—THE STRIATULA ZONE. 


The lowest division of the Hackberry, that referred to by Webster 
in his earlier publications as the ‘‘Lower beds’’ and the ‘ Lower 
Horizon,” is the one to which Webster and I have applied the 
name Striatula zone... The most extensive development of this 
zone is at the pits of the American Brick and Tile Company and 
the Mason City Brick and Tile Company (owned and operated 
by the latter) at Mason City, in Cerro Gordo County, where it 
attains a thickness of at least twenty-five feet. The lower eighteen 
to twenty feet are composed of more or less indurated, fairly heavy- 
bedded strata of coarse, gritty texture, strongly iron stained. 
These beds contain abundant fucoid remains, the most abundant 
being a small form one-fourth to one-half inch in diameter. It 
lies along the bedding planes in tangled, curling masses, and is 
very characteristic of the lowermost ledges. Further up in the 
zone a larger, branching form, with a diameter sometimes reaching 
two and one-half inches, predominates. Both are associated to- 
gether, but there is a distinct predominance of the small species 
below, and the large one higher up in the zone. The zone is the 
Fucoid faunule of Fig. 3. 

Above the indurated beds containing fucoids as the principal 
fossils are six to eight feet of gritty, soft shales and clay-shales 


*American Midland Naturalist, V., p. 214. 


184 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


which oxidize to a light yellowish. There are but slight traces of 
induration, and the oxidization is much more complete than in the 
lower beds. Fossils are quite common as casts, Schizophoria stria- 
tula (Schloth.), Atrypa reticularis (Linn.), A. hystrix Hall, and 
Spirifer Whitneyi Hall being the principal species. This bed 
composes the Reticularis faunule of Fig. 3. 

At the pits of the Western States Cement Company, some three- 
fourths of a mile to the northwest of the Mason City pits the shales 
below the Hackberry is being worked for the production of cement. 
They are overlain by seven to nine feet of the Striatula Zone, 
which is stripped from the smooth, plastic formation below. The 
Striatula section, while incomplete in the extreme, nevertheless 
shows a great difference from that at the Mason City pits. The 
entire thickness of the indurated strata is represented by less than 
six inches of hard, shaley limestone, bearing fucoids. Above this 
are seven or eight feet of material very similar to that described 
above as constituting the Reticularis faunule, but with very few 
fossils, and those as very poor casts. Mr. A. P. Potts, of the Mason 
City Brick and Tile Company tells me that the heavy, indurated 
beds have virtually disappeared less than three-eighths of a mile 
north of the Mason City pits. This is an extreme example of the 
decided local variation that characterizes the upper Devonian of 
this particular district. 


Il. C.—THE SPIRIFER ZONE. 


The most striking, and certainly the most interesting, pale- 
ontologically of the divisions of the Hackberry is the Spirifer Zone, 
which at Hackberry Grove attains a thickness of approximately 
twenty feet. An exact determination of the boundary between the 
Spirifer and Striatula zones is made difficult by the talus. 

This zone, as developed at Hackberry Grove, is divided into at 
least three faunules, though their bounds have not been very care- 
fully iworked out. The table on the following page gives these 
faunules, with the distinguishing characters. 

The Striatula Zone in the neighborhood of Rockford, and par- 
ticularly at the brick pits, is composed of much the same yellow, 
calcareous shales, but with a much lesser tendency towards in- 
duration than is to be noted at Hackberry Grove. The develop- 
ment of faunules is more obscure than at Hackberry Grove, and 
I am inclined to think that there is less parallelism between the 


HACKBERRY STAGE OF THE UPPER DEVONIAN. TES 


fe Corals and stromatoporoids at their greatest abundance; 


Charactophyllum, Pachyphyllum, Siromatorpoella, Syr- 
ingostroma predominating genera. Brachiods 
gastropods abundant; Naticopsis more abundant 
than in Faunule 2. Pelecypods seemingly at height; 
Paracyclas predominating species. 


Stromatoporella 
Faunule. 


2. 
Hystrix 


| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
Wiens at greatest abundance; Atrypa, Schizo- 
| 
| 
| 


phoria, Strophonella, Douvillina, Spirifer the pre- 
Faunule. dominating genera. 
re Naticopsis gigantea and Floydia the dominant gastro- 
Gigantea pods. Brachiopods abundant. Corals much less 
Faunule abundant than in upper two faunules. 


Fic. 4.—FAUNULES OF THE SPIRIFER ZONE AT HACKBERRY GROVE. | 


two localities than I at first supposed.' It is certain that the 
horizon of dominant gastropod development at Rockford is above 
that of dominant brachiopod development. The upper portions 
of the zone are not present, so the development of the Stromato- 
porella faunule, if it was developed, cannot be determined. 

Three miles west of Rockford, at a roadside exposure known 
locally as Bird Hill, the Spirifer consists of two distinct faunal 
divisions. The lower is made up of compact clay-shales crowded 
with small fucoids, but without many other fossils; the second is 
of soft clay-shale similar to that of the Rockford pits, but with a 
distinctly different fauna. Lzoclema occidens (H. & W.), common 
at the Rockford pits, is here almost uncommon, but the smaller 
bryozoa are to be found in abundance. Rugose corals (Charac- 
tophyllum nanum (H. & W.), Zaphrentis solida H: & W., Chono- 
phyllum ellipticum (H. &. W.) are abundant, and on the whole are 
of a larger size than at Rockford. The general aspect of the brachi- 
opod fauna is different from that at Rockford, though the species 
are much the same. There is a notable tendency among the Spurifers 
of the hungerfordi and whitneyt groups to develop wide forms, as 
S. whitney: producius Fenton. 

I think it has been made plain in these descriptions that there 
are distinct faunal differences in the Spirifer Zone. These faunal 
differences seem to me to be dependent on locality and local en- 
vironment rather than upon time. Doubtless stratigraphical 
position and individual variations are related, but I am inclined 
to lay the major part of the responsibility to local environment. 


*Am, Jour. Sci, XLVIII, p. 363. 


186 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


The difference of the fauna at one point from that at another is 
far more easily seen in the results of a collecting trip than in a 
collection or in faunal lists, for the difference is primarily one of 
numbers of specimens, secondly of variations, and probably last, 
of species. This last statement cannot, of course, apply to such 
forms as Lioclema occidens, which, while abundant about Rockford 
is uncommon (relatively, at least) at Bird Hill, and rare at Hack- 
berry. 


THE OWEN SUBSTAGE. 
Il. D.—TuHeE Ip1IosTRoMA ZONE. 


The highest portion of the Hackberry Stage which is in place 
at Hackberry Grove is composed of four to six and one-half feet 
of rather heavily bedded limestone, gray, gray-buff, or bu in 
color, and crowded throughout by two species of Stromatoporoids 
commonly referred to the genus [diosiroma. Associated with the 
species are several species of Siromatoporella, and numerous large 
specimens of Naticopsis gigantea H. & W. At a small exposure 
south and east of Hackberry Grove the lower portions of this 
zone contain numerous corals, among them being Aulopora an- 
nectens Clarke. Westernia crassa Webster, and W. gigantea Web- 
ster have been taken from this zone at Hackberry Grove. The 
limestones of the [diostroma zone are very distinct, both litho- 
logically and faunally from the underlying Spirifer beds. At all 
points where they were examined they were characterized by the 
two slender [diostromas. 


Jl. E.—vTue Naticopsis Zone. 


The type locality for the Hackberry Stage is the Hackberry 
Grove exposure, and this same exposure furnishes the typical 
development of the Cerro Gordo Stage. The type locality for the 
Owen substage, and its upper two zones is the Owen Grove quarry, 
near Owen Creek, in Portland Township. At that locality there 
are some thirty feet of dark buff or brownish limestone, shales, 
shaley limestones, and dolomites overlying the Idiostroma beds, 
and characterized by their abundant gastropod fauna, in which 
the species Naticopsis gigantea predominates. The three species 
of Westernia, two or three unidentified species of Ceneostoma, 
and Floydia concentrica Webster, are among the other gastropods. 


ee eee 


HACKBERRY STAGE OF THE UPPER DEVONIAN. 189 
- 
II. F—THE ACERVULARIA ZONE. 

Above the Naticopsis Zone at Owen Grove there is a slope of 
about twenty feet, on the surface of which are numerous fragments 
of limestone bearing, among other fossils, a new species of Acervu- 
laria that has been variously referred to Acervularia profunda 
Hall, and A. inequalis H. & W. by various authors. Pachyphyllum 
woodmani (White) is common, in at least three varietal forms; 
Strombodes, Alveolites, Chonophyllum, and other corals are present. 


There are several species of gastropods, and pelecypods of the 


genus Paracyclas; brachiopods are relatively uncommon. 

In the bed of Hackberry Creek, east of the Hackkerry Grove 
escarpment, there are large amounts of residual.material from the 
Acervularia Zone, and it is here that the kest collecting is to ke 
found. Corals are common; stromatoporoids common, but less 


_ so than they would be in weathered Spirifer Zone material from 


Hackkerry Grove. Stromatoporella imcrusians (H. & W.), S. 
solidula (H. &. W.) and several apparently undescribed species 
are among them. Both corals and Stromatoporoids are frequently 
pierced by what seem to be borings of a large species of Cliona, 
in no way allied to the C. Hackberryensis of the Spirifer zone. 


II. G.—- DISTRIBUTION OF THE FORMATION. 


The accompanying map, made up by C. L. Webster and myself, 
will serve to show the general distribution of the formation. I 
am particularly indebted to Mr. Webster for data regarding the 
Owen Substage and the questionable Hackberry- areas in Worth 
County. His long study of the formation has enabled him to secure 
much data that I could not, in my brief work, secure. 


IlJ].—TuHeE Fauna OF THE HACKBERRY. 


The following list, while far from complete, will serve to give 
an idea of the fauna in general, and in its stratigraphic relationships. 
No attempt is made to enumerate all of the undescribed species; 
those noted are in all cases the most striking or most characteristic 
ones. : 

In the foregoing pages considerable mention of various species 
has Leen made, and the stratigraphic relations of many forms have 
teen noted. In order, however, to give a staisfactory idea of the 
tases for division of the formation into substages and zones here 
descriked, the following list is divided into three sections: the 


’ 


188 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 
fossils of the Owen substage, those of the Spirifer zone, and those of 
the Striatula zone. Even this division, however, fails to give the 
true distinction between the last two subdivisions; this is apparent 
only in survey of the results of several days of careful collecting. 
It is a difference not so much of species as of numbers of species, 
and numbers of individuals, there being a greater abundance of 
both in the Spirifer zone. 

In the following list, the abbreviation “‘sp.’ 
species is undetermined; the abbreviation ‘‘n. sp.’ 
the species (or variety: ‘‘n. var.’’) is undescribed. 


‘ ’ 


is used where the 
’ indicates that 


Fossi, SPECIES OF THE OWEN SUBSTAGE. 


PLANTAE 
_ “Pucoids,’”’ of at least two species, undetermined. ~ 
ANIMALES. 
Porifera 
Cliona sp. or sps. Large boring forms in Alveolites, Acervu- 
laria, Pachyphyllum, etc. 
Coelenterata 
Anthozoa 
Heliophyllum sp. 
_ Heliophyllum n. sp. 
Chonophyllum ellipticum H. & W. 
Chonophyllum sp. 
Zaphrentis solida H & W. 
Cystiphyllum mundulum H. & W. 
Charactophyllum nanum (H. & W.) 
Strombodes johanni (H. & W.) 
Strombodes johanni multiradiatus (H. & W.) 
Acervularia cf. inequalis H. & W. 
Acervularia n. ‘sp. 
Acervularia n. sp. 
Pachyphyllum woodmani (White) 
Pachyphyllum woodmani (White) var. 
Pachyphyllum crassisostatum Webster 
Pachyphyllum crassum Webster 
Alveolites rockfordensis H. & W. 
Cladopora robusta Rom.? 
Aulopora iowensis H. & W. 
Aulopora cf. saxivadum H. & W 


: 
: 


. 


HACKBERRY STAGE OF THE UPPER DEVONIAN. 189 


Aulopora annectens Clarke ° 
Aulopora sp. : 
Aulopora n. sp. 
Syringopora sp. 
Hydrozoa (?) (Stromatoporoidea) 
Stromatoporella sps. 
Stromatoporella solidula (H. & W.) 
Stromatoporella incrustans (H. & bc 
Stromatoporella n. s. 
_ Syringostroma planulatum’ (H. & W.) 
Idiostroma n. sp. 
Idiostroma n. sp. 
Vermes , 
Spirorkis ompkaloides (Goldfuss) 
Forms prokably belonging to the Tubulifera. 
Echinodermata 
Various unidentified remains, fragmental, of crinoids. 
Molluscoidea - 
Bryozoa : 
Hederella alternata (H. & W.) 


j 
3 Hederella sp. ce 
1 
4 
3 
4 
; 
j 
j 


Lioclema? sp. 
Brachiopoda 
Schizophoria striatula (Schloth.) 

_ Leptostrophia canace (H, & W.) 
Strophonella reversa Hall 
Productella hallana Walcott. 

Atrypa reticularis (Linn.) 
Atrypa hystrix Hall 
Atrypa hystrix planostulcata Webster 
Spirifer orestes H. & W.: 
Spirifer hungerfordi Hall 
Spirifer whitneyi Hall . 
g ‘Mollusca 
; Pelecypoda . ° 
Paracyclas validalinea Webster 
Paracyclas sabini White 
Paracyclas elliptica Hall 
Leptodesma sp. : 
Gastropoda - 


igo THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Bellerophon sp. 
Straparollus cf. cyclostamus Hall 
Ceneostoma sps. 

Pleurotomaria sp. 
Diaphorostoma lineatum (Con.) 
Floydia concentrica Webster 
Naticopsis gigantea H. & W. 
Westernia crassa Webster 
Westernia owensis Webster 
Westernia gigantea Webster 


FossILs. OF THE SPIRIFER ZONE. 


PLANTAE 
‘*Fucoids,’ 
ANIMALES 
Porifera 
Cliona hackberryensis Thomas cy 
Cliona sp. 
Coelenterata 
Anthozoa 
Zaphrentis solida H. & W. 
Cyathophyllum n. sp. 
Charactophyllum nanum (H. & W.) 
Heliophyllum cf. scrutarium Clarke & Swartz. 
Chonophyllum ellipticum H. & W. ng 
Chonophyllum n. sp. 
Strombodes johanni (H. & W.) 
Strombodes johanni multiradiatus (H. & W.) 
Pachyphyllum woodmani (White) 
Pachyphyllum woodmani cf. gregarium Wetster 
Pachyphyllum crassicostatum Wel ster 
Pachyphyllum ordinatum Wet ster 
Pachyphyllum crassum Webster 
Pachyphyllum n. sp. 
Macgeea solitaria (H. & W.) 
Macgeea parva Webster 
Macgeea culmula Wetster | 
Acervularia inequalis H. & W. 
Acervularia n. sp. 
Acervularia profunda Hall 


three or more species. 


HACKBERRY STAGE OF THE UPPER DEVONIAN. IgI 


Alveolites rockfordensis H. & W. 
Cladopora: cf. robusta Rom. 
Cladopora cf. palmata H. & W. 
Aulopora iowensis N. & W. 
Aulopora saxivadum H. & W. 
Aulopora filiformis Billings 
Aulopora n. sps. 
Syringopora sp. 

Hydrozoa (?) 
Stromatoporella solidula (H. & W.) 
Stromatoporella incrustans (H. & W.) 
Actinostroma cf. expansum (H. & W.) 


2 
x 
s 


> Actinostroma n. sp. 
3 Syringistroma planulatum (H. & W.) 
: Vermes 
¢ Serpularia, sps. 
A Cornulites, sps. 
. Spirortis omphaloides (Goldfuss) 
Spirortis arkonensis Nich. 
* Echinodermata 
: Crinodea 
: Unidentified Crinoid remains; about ten species (Webster). 
Echinoidea 
Nortonechinus n. s. 
Spines of unidentified forms. 
ss _~ Molluscoidea 


Bryozoa 
Virella? sp. 
Hederella alternata (H. & W.) 
federella cf. filiformis’ Nich. 
Lioclema occidens (H. & W.) 
Lioclema minutissimum Nich. 
Fenestella vera Uhlrich 
Fenestella sp. 
Fridotrypa sps. 

Brachiopoda 
Crania famelica H. & W. 
Crania famelica H. & W. var. 
Crania crenistriata Hall 
Schizophoria striatula (Schloth.) 


192 


THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Schizophoria striatula impressa (Hall) 
Leptostrophia canace (H. & W.) 
Leptostrophia perplana nervosa (Hall) 
Stropheodonta n. sp. (ef. calvini Miller) 
Stropheodonta exilis Calvin(?) 
Douvillina, n. sp. 

Douvillina arcuata (Hall) 

Douvillina arcuata maximla Fenton . 
Strophonella reversa Hall 

Strophonella reversa gravis Fenton 
Strophonella reversa hybrida (H. & W.) 
Schuchertella prava Hall 

Schuchertella prava Hall 

Schuchertella sp. 

Productella hallana Walcott 

Productella truncata Hall 

Productella speciosa Hall 

Gypidula comis munda (Calvin) 
Gypidula cf. comis Owen 


~ Rhynchonella subacuminata Webster 


Camarotoechia contracta saxatilis Hall 
Rhipidomella cf. penelope Hall 
Pugnoides altus (Calvin) 

Pugnoides ambiguus (Calvin) 
Liorhynchus iris Hall 

Liorhynchus sp. 

Centronella navicella (Hall) 

Cranaena calvini (H. & W.) 

Atrypa reticularis (Linn.) 

Atrypa reticularis hackberryénsis (Webster) 
Atrypa reticularis alta Fenton 

Atrypa reticularis (Linn.) n. var. 
Atrypa hystrix Hall 

Atrypa cf. spinosa Hall 

Atrypa cf. aspera Hall 

Spirifer whitneyi Hall 

Spirifer whitneyi rockfordensis Fenton 
Spirifer whitneyi gradatus Fenton 
Spirifer whitneyi productus Fenton 
Spirifer — sp. 


_ Spirifer hungerfordi Hall. 
Spirifer n. sp. 
Spirifer macbrideii Calvin 
Spirifer orestes H. & W. 
Spirifer substrigosus Webster 
Spirifer websteri Fenton 
Spirifer cyrtinaformis H. & W. 
Spirifer cyrtinaformis helenae Fenton 
Cyrtina hamiltonensis recta Hall 
Ambocoelia sp. 
Reticularia n. sp. 
Athyris cf. minutissima Webster 
Mollusca 
Pelecypoda | 
Grammysia sp. 
. Spenotus contractus Hall(?) 
Leptodesma sp. 
_ Lucina sp.(?) 
Paracyclas sabini White 
Paracyclas elliptica Hall 
Paracyclas validalinea Webster 
Glossites lingualis Hall 
Pterinopecten sps. 
Aviculopecten sps. 
Gastropoda 
Bellerophon sp. 
Straparollus cyclostamus (Hall) 
Straparollus sp. 
Platyostoma(?) insolitum Webster - 
Platyostoma(?) antiquum Webster 
Platyostoma(?) modestum Webster 
_ Diaphorostoma cf. ventricosum (Con.) 
Cyclonema sp. : 
Pleurotomaria verticillata Webster 
Holopea(?) iowensis Webster 
4 Holopea sps. | 
Naticopsis gigantea H. & W. 
Naticopsis gigantea hackberryensis Webster 
; Naticopsis gigantea websteri Fenton 
| Naticopsis magnificentis Webster 


v 


Te ne ee TEE nS SR Sree eg ee et eee Tere 


ae fini 


HACKBERRY STAGE OF THE UPPER DEVONIAN. 


193 


194 


SS 


aie 
x 
aes 
y 


wl < san Sar gS ee 
er ph 2 


TamuM! ¢ 
5 aos QAO RARE 
SO aoe 
= WUE RECA PRY SIND 
ISS Nae Ea 
Sean GE y 


ANAS AACA ar DARGA ED DEBE 
GEER BEE EERE BEES ERGs Asse Aare = 
WEBEL EBEBBasaiea JBRRRRAREEE LEDARBI 
AN BARBRA RRERT. Re Cl 
AAS WEE Ba Gtaae aur VA ASA SAA 
BS a GEt AUREESRRERRRS See \ ARS 
TALE DREEE EE ABE BEES BERBERS iv 
QR ALLEL BBASGtDe ia 


Fic. 2.—Geologic Map Showing Distsibution 


HACKBERRY STAGE OF TEE UPPER DEVONIAN. 195 


VA 
SAS RE BE BEG DRE EBB 
SSSR 


SAEs GAS AN 
RS WRaSSdod 


‘> 


N 

> SS 

4 WY s 
ay 
pa 


2 
FS 
= 
te DRSSS St ad VEE 
= ROSS SERSSASSSSSRS 
a SSSSESSS CNB oa lies “3 
bey SGSENENEATE BSE SB wf eo} rH? So 
; = “ fe] a2 8- 
a AS ox a o}a] 8 4% 
+ ROSS POSS, = S}=] z]}s 22 
: SEE CATES GEG ANAT aOR v S) Fs ies ewe 
* ESSE SSO o 2 Be ae 
S| 3 Heb] 
be 1% Hab] = 
< Bo e300 
o 300 
t 3 sts “ SiG 
q < a Bai & B| Sy 
4 6 © SEH si]si] |S] xs 
a, = O13 |]R}| ° =} vf 
2 ¢ - 
co) a) 
ck fh = o 2 | aes i) 8 
Oe SA ote Ss}. 7 g||=3} -|s 
see es Stoo Pas eS ew 
3 © ~ 
O Sul Sy Ojo O]iL ele v|~ 
z = = & ; @ = 
F pe & a c o> < Res 
: e ol ©.0 3 =< HH Saal al 
| OSG 2223 es (SSeS 
So Se sla] s* [eee lolo 
4 St Do fa CF ae 
| ae SAS BRS e 
One Z < 
Om 3 SZ= IA 
’ lj fo) = SWAT KSLA 
rae) : ueruonegd add 
ee ei 
=) Q 5 


of the Hackberry Stage, and other Formations. 


196 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 
Floydia concentrica Webster . 
Floydia concentrica multisinuata Fenton 
Loxonema hamiltonensis Hall — 
Loxonema sps. 
Platydesma sp. 
Paleotrochus sps. 
Cephalopoda 
Orthoceras berryx Hall 
Orthoceras consortale Hall 
Orthoceras sps. 
Gomphoceras sps. 
Manticoceras pattersoni (Hall) 
Vertebrata 
Piscea 
Ptyctodus calceolus M. & W. 
Dinicthys pustulosus Eastman - 
Diplodus striatus Eastman 
Diplodus priscus Eastman 
Apsidicthys sp. 


Fossi, SPECIES OF THE STRIATULA ZONE. 


PLANTAE 
‘““Fucoids,’”’ several species. 
ANIMALES 
Molluscoidea 
Bryozoa 
Lioclema occidens (H. & W.)* 
Undetermined species. 
Brachiopoda 
Crania famelica H. & W.* 
Leptostrophia canace (H. & W.)* 
Douvillina arcuata (Hall) * 
Gypidula cf. comis (owen) n. s.* 
‘Centronella navicella (Hall)* 
Centronella sp. 
Cranaena calvini (H. & W.)?* 
Schizophoria striatula (Schloth.) 
Atrypa reticularis (Linn.) 
Atrypa reticularis alta Fenton?* 


7 


* Found in the Gypidula faunule, at Rockford. 


F 
d 
“ 


HACKBERRY STAGE OF THE UPPER DEVONIAN. 197 
Spirifer whitneyi Hall 
Spirifer hungerfordi Hall 
Athyris minutissima Webster 
Mollusca 
Pelecypoda 
Glossites sp. 
Grammysia(?) sp. 
Paracyclas sabini White* 
Paracyclas validalinea Webster 
Gastropoda 
Plaiyostoma mirum Webster 
Platyostoma pervetum Wetster 
Platyostoma sp. 
Platyostoma n. sp. 
Naticopsis rara Webster 
Turbo (?) strigullata Webster 
Turbo .(?) incerta Webster 
Holopea tenuicarinata Webster 
Cyclonema brevilineata Webster 
Cyclonema subcrenulata Webster 


IV.—TueE AGE AND RELATIONSHIPS OF THE HACKBERRY STAGE. 


In section I of this paper there is given a summary of the age 
and equivalency of the Hackberry keds; it is not necessary to 
review this here. The two important questions are: (1) Is there 
any described equivalent of the Hackberry Stage? (2) What claims 
to the rank of stage can be advanced for the formation? 2 

The first question can be answered with a_decided negative. 
Calvin, interpreted the fauna of the Independence Formation of 
Iowa as the predecessor and direct ancestor of the Hackberry Fauna. 
This interpretation, however, was based on a very small numter of 
species, and it is doubtful if some of these can be satisfactorily 
referred to both formations. 

Clarke saw a considerable relationship ketween the Hackterry, 
Independence, and High Point faunas. His conclusions, however, 
were drawn, as shown in the.table given by him, from but a small 
fraction of the bryozoan, brachiopod and mulluscan faunas of the 
Hackberry, the total number of species from the three formations 
which were included in t'e table being forty-three. Aside from 
~ FBulletin 16, U. S. G. S.; pp. 74-76. 


198 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


paleogeographic difficulties, the paleontologic evidence is against 
rather than in favor of correlation of the Hackberry with the High 
Point. 

If an equivalent for the Hackberry is to be found, it must be 
looked for in the north and west rather than in the east. The simi- 
larity of certain Hackberry species with forms from northwest 
Canada and from western United States" is of interest. Thus 
certain western forms of Spirifer whitneyi Hall are strikingly like 
the Hackberry form which I have called S. whiineyi gradacus. 
But as yet nothing of sufficient importance to allow for correlation 
has come up. Therefore, if we except time equivalency, we may 
state without question that there is no described equivalent of the 
Hackberry Stage. 

But is this formation a stage? Some writers Hitt not; in one 
publication of the Iowa Survey the formation was referred to as a 
substage.? On the other hand, Calvin, Webster, Thomas, and others 
have not hesitated to give the Hackberry the rank of stage or group. 

It is true that if we compare the thickness of the rocks of the 
Hackberry with that of such formations as the Cedar Valley— 
to: take another Iowa Devonian formation—or with the great 
thicknesses of some of the eastern formations, it makes but a poor 
showing. But thickness of sediments does not make a stage, just 
as it does not make a system. Fossils provide the evidence which 
can be relied upon. 

The great difference of the Hackberry fauna from that of any 
other described formation has been dwelt upon; that feature is of 
importance in this connection as well as in correlation. The 
radical change of the Hadkberry fauna from those préceding it in 
the Iowa region is also of note. So far as known now, there is not a 
single fossil species in the Sheffield formation which is found in the 
Cedar Valley or Nora formations. So far as known, there is not a 
single species common to the Hackberry and Sheffield formations. 
The number of species common to the Hackberry and the Cedar 
Valley is small, and by careful study will become smaller. 

On the other hand, if one is to consider the wealth of species, 
and the wealth of new species, in the Hackberry, the arguments 
for giving the formation the rank of stage are greatly strengthened. 
The number of formations in the Paleozoic which can show as 


*See particularly Kindle; Bulletin 391, U. S. G. §&. 
*Eastman, Ia. Geol. Surv. Vol. XVII, pp. 45-50. 


¥ 
s 
> 
8 
> 
} 
x 
* 
7 
Pd 
4 


¥ COTES BM Pes 
i 


HACKBERRY STAGE OF THE UPPER DEVONIAN. 199 


prolific and as distinct a fauna, with as many forms known from 
that formation alone, is by no means great. And when it is recol- 
lected that the maximum composite thickness of the formation is 
but one hundred feet, and the average thickness very much less, 
there seems even less reason to call the formation a substage 
Moreover, if one calls a formation a substage he implies that it is 
a division of some stage. But since there is no known equivalent 
of the Hackberry, to what stage might it be referred? 


V.—SUMMARY. 


1.—The highest, and youngest, position in the Devonian of 
Iowa is occupied by a formation whose known maximum composite 
thickness is about one hundred feet. 

2.—This formation has been discussed under various formation 
names. The name Hackberry, proposed in 1889, has priority over 
other names and is more directly suitable to the formation than 
auy other name which has been applied to it. Other names should 
therefore be regarded as synonyms, and should not he applied to 
this formation. 

3.—The Hackberry formation is distinct, with no described 
equivalent. It is correctly designated as a stage (or group, as that 
term is commonly used). 


EXPLANATION OF PLATE 


_ Fics. 1—2. Airypa reiicularis alia.Fenton. A characteristic Spirifer zone 


form, found both at Hackberry Grove and Rockford. 


Fics. 3—4. Spirifer whitneyi rockfordensis Fenton. An erratic form of 
considerable rarity, which I have found only at Rockford. 


Fics. 5—-6. Spiriter whitneyt productus Fenton. A form of S. whitneyi 
seldom found at Hackberry, sparingly at Rockford, but characteristic 
of the Bird Hill exposure. Specimen from Rockford. 


Fics. 7—10. Spirifer whitneyi gradatus Fenton. Rockford, Ia. A form 
best developed in the Rockford district, in the middle portion of the 
Spirifer zone. 

Fics. 11-17. Spirifer cyrtinaformis helenae Fenton. Rockford, Iowa. 
Specimens showing the slanting area and produced hinge-line which 
is particularly characteristic of the Bird Hill specimens. Good examples 
are less common at Rockford, and still less so at Hackberry. 

Fics. 18-22. Sirophonella reversa gravis Fenton. Rockford, Iowa. A form 
which, although usually best preserved at Rockford, is more charac- 
teristic of Hackberry Grove, Gigantea faunule. 


Fics. 23-25. Douvillina arcuata maxima Fenton. Hackberry Grove, Iowa. 
A form® which is found mainly at Hackberry Grove. 


200 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST | 


Fic. 27. Spirifer websteri Fenton. Rockford, Iowa. A distinct species of 
the orestes group. I originally referred to this form the one shown in 
Figs. 28-31, but this was incorrect. 

Fics. 26; 28-31. Spirifer specics undescribed. Rockford, Iowa. Another 
species of the group of S. orestes H. & W. Spirifer zone; about equally 
characteristic of Rockford and Hackberry Grove. - 


EXPLANATION OF PLATE 


Fic. 1—2a. Naticopsis gigantea Hall and Whitfield. Hackberry Grove, Ia. 
Fic. 3. Naticopsis giganiea Hall and Whitfield. A large specimen, upper — 
whorls restored. Hackberry Grove, Iowa. - 
Fic. 4. Floydia concentrica multisinuaia Fenton. Holotype. Rockford, Iowa. 
Fic. 5.—5a. Floydia concentrica Webster. Fig. 5; portion of a large speci- 
men. Fig. 5a; cross-section of shell of specimen shown In Fig. 5. Rock- 
ford, Iowa. ‘ 
Figures 1-3 are characteristic Spirifer zone forms from Hackberry Grove. 
Figures 4-5 show two typical specimens from the upper part of the Spirifer 
zone at Rockford. t 


A Consideration of Certain Genera Proposed by Ehrhart. 


BY HOMER D. HOUSE z 

The question of what constitutes. proper publication of a genus 
has received more than a little attention both in codes, proposed, 
promulgated or adopted, and by individual expression of opinion. 
A new genus published today without description but merely by 
the implication or indication of a type species would certainly 
seem inadequately published. However any code or-set or rules 
which is retroactive is sure to encounter perplexing situations, 
which lead sooner or later to various evasions or deliberate 
exceptions. : ; 

This article deals with a set of generic names published by 
Friedrich Ehrhart in 1789 (Beitrage zur Naturkunde und den 
damit verwandten Wissenschaften, etc. 4: 146-148. 1789). Like . 
many genera published by Rafinesque, Sweet, and several other 
early writers these genera were published without description, 
merely by the designation of a previously published species. The 
frequency with which this sort of generic publication occurs in- 
dicates that it must have been at the time regarded as a quite 
proper method. Many of Necker’s genera are now regarded as 


' A CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN GENERA 201 
invalid because no species were indicated, although not a few of 

them have been more or less commonly reeognized and used in 
floras and manuals up to within a few years ago.” 

Before passing to a detailed consideration of Ehrhart’s genera 
it may not be out of place to enumerate a few commonly accepted 
generic names which were published by Rafinesque merely by the 
citation of a type species. More extended search would doubtless 

* reveal other genera by other authors which telong in the same 
catagory. ° : 
Adlumia Raf. 
Sceoria (Hicoria) Raf. 
Spathyema Raf. 
a Triadenum Raf. 
f Achroanthes Raf. (Malaxis Sw.) . 
; Washingtonia Raf. (Osmorhiza Raf.) 
F Odostemon Raf. 
f Quamasia Raf. 
: Leptamnium Raf. 
f 
: 
: 


£ Thalesia Raf. 
‘ Leptilon Raf. Z 
$ The number preceeding each of Ehrhart’s names is that of the 
i order in which he published them. 
4 I.— PHAEOCEPHALUM Ebrh. Beitr. 4: 146. 1789. 
q | (Rynchospora Vahl, Enum. 2: 229. 1806) 
% The type as indicated by Ehrhart, is Schoenus fuscus L,. Schoenus 
: corniculatus .Lam. not keing regarded as congéneric with this 
a group is not included in the following enumeration of species 
: formerly referred to Rynchospora. 
) P. album (1) Rynchospora alba (1..) Vahl 
; P. axillare (Lam.) ~ R. axillare (Lam.) Britton 
j P. Balduini (A. Gray) R. Baldwin A. Gray 
Z P. brachychaetum (Sauv.) R. brachychaeta Sauv. 
P. caducum (EIl.) R. caduca Ell. 
P. chapmani (M. A. Curtis) R. chapmani M. A. Curtis 
4 P. ciliatum (Michx.) R. ciliata (Michx.) Vahl 
: P. compressum (Carey) R. compressa Carey 
P. Curtissw (Britton). R. Curtissu Britton 
P. cymosum (El1.) “R. cymosa Ell. 
P. decurrens (Chapm.) R. decurrens Chapm. 


ty 


Vou vuyeyuyuyuyuyyuUuDuD Vuyyyyyy 


. dodecandrum (Baldw.) 
. distans (Michx.) ; 
. divergens (M. A. Curtis) 
. Earlei (Britton) * 

. fasciculare (Michx.) . 
. filifolium (Torr.) 

. fuscoides( Boeckl.) 
fuscum (L.) 


. glomeratum (1,.) 

. gracilenium (A. Gray) 
Grayt (Kunth) 
inexpansum (Michx.) 
intermedium (Chapm.) 
Kneiskernit (Carey) 
leptorhynchum (C. Wr.) 
. microcarpum (Baldw.) 


. milaceum (T,am.) 


mixta (Britton) - 
palulum (A. Gray) 


. pallidum (M. A. Curtis) 


perplexum ’ (Britton) 
. Plankii (Britton) 


. plumosum (EIL.) 


proliferum (Small) 
punctatum (El1.) 

. pusillum (Chapm.) 

. rariflorum (EIl.) 

. solitare (R. M. Harper) 


. schoenoides (EII.) 
. stipitatum (Chapm.) 
. Torreyanum (A. Gray) 


Traceyt (Britton) 


2.—Leucocoma Ehrh. |. c. p. 146. 
The type of this is designated as Eriophorum alpinum J,. The 
genus has recently been taken up by Rydkerg (Leucocoma alpina 
(L.) Rydb., Rocky Mountain Flora, 108. 1917). 
11.—LEIOPHYLLUM Ehrh., 1. c. 
The type is designated as Schoczus compressus \,., which is 


= , 2 ; 7 gay a 
02 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST © 


AAAAAADAN. 


Schoenus fuscus I,., R. fusca (1,.) « 


DRADRAARRAARAAAAARAAA AA DA 


tach te es 


. dodecandra Baldw. 

. distans (Michx.) Vahl 
. divergens M. A. Curtis 
. Earle Britton 


. fascicularis (Michx.) Vahl 
. filofolia ‘Torr. 


. fuscoides Boeckl. 


Ait. f. 

. glomeraia (1,.) Vahl 
gracilenta A. Gray 

Grayt Kunth 

inexpansa (Michx.) Vahl 

. intermedia (Chapm.) Britton 
Kneiskerniit Carey 
leptorhyncha C. Wright 
microcarpa Baldw. 
milacea (Lam.) A. Gray 
mixta Britton 

palula A. Gray 

pallida M. A. Curtis : 
perplexa Britton 

Plankit Britton 

plumosa El. 

prolifera Small 

punctaia Ell. 

. pusilla Chapm.; M.A. Curtis 
rariflora Ell. 

. solitaria R. M. Harper 
schoenoides (Ell.) Britton 
. stipitaia Chapm. 
Torreyana A. Gray 

. Traceyi Britton. 


“and gai lia acl. 


Ve A CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN GENERA 203 


Scirpus Carices Retz. (Scirpus compressus Pers., not Moench). 


13.—TIPHOGETON Ehrh., I. c. 


The type is designated as /snardia palustris L.., and since it is 
also the type of Isnardia, Tiphogeton becomes a synonym of 
Isnardia. 


14.—HyYDROPHILA Ehrh., 1. c. 
The type is designated as Tillaca aquatica L. The same species 
is made the type of Tilleastrum’ Britton (Bull. N. Y. Bot. Gard. 
Bais 1903) 


H. aquatica (L.) Tillaea aquatica \., Tillaea sim- 
plex Nutt., Bulliarda aquatica DC., Tilleastrum aquatica 
Britton. 


H. Drummondii (T. & G.) Tillaea Drumondiu'T. & G., Tillea- 
strum Drumondi Britton. 

H. Vaillantii (Willd.) Tillaea Vaillanti Willd., Tuillea- 
strum Vaillanti Britton. 


15.—PratTicova Ehrh., 1. c. 
The type is designated as Thalicirum simplex V., native of 
Europe. The name is not valid unless quite extensive segregation 
of the genus Thalictrum, as now constituted, should be made. 


16.—Limnas Ehbrh., 1. c. 


The type is designated as Ophrys paludosa L. This has been 
placed in the genus Sturmia Reichb. (1828), which is invalidated 
by Sturmia Hoppe (1799) and Sturmia Gaertn. (1805). 

The writer has previously pointed out (Torr. Club Bul. 32: 378. 
1905) that the type of Orphys L., is Orphys ovata L., and that 
Listera is a generic synonym. ‘The type of Malaxis Sw. (1788) is 
M. spicata, congeneric with our tative species now known as M. 
monophylla (1..) Sw., and M. unifolia Michx. Ophrys paludosa L., 
was also included by Swartz in Malaxis, and has been reported 
from Otter Tail County, Minn. and is common in Europe, so that 
Limnas Ehrh., must be regarded as a synonymous generic name of 
Malaxis. M. paludosa however, differs in certain important 
characters from our native species, and if seperated from Malaxis, 
the generic name Limnas would be available for it. 


21.—Mariscus Ehrh., 1. c. 
The type is designated as Schoenus mariscus L. This name dating 


204 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


from Haller, had already been taken up for this type by Zinn 
(Cat. Hort. Goett. 79. 1757). Cladium P. Br. (1756) being a 
hyponym, is not recognized in recent floras. 


34.—STYPHORRHIZA Ehrh., l. c. p. 147. 


The type is designated as Polygonum viviparum L., and as a 
genus is antedated by Bistorta (C. Bauhin) Miller. 


37.—HELLEBORWWE Ebrh., 1. c. 

The type is designated as Serapzas latifolia which is the same as 
Serapias helleborine L., now recognized as the type of Serapias, 
so that Helleborine Ehrh, becomes another of the numerous 
synonyms of Serapias. 

41.—TRICHOPHYLLUM Ehbrh., l. c. - 
The type is designated as Scirpus acicularts L., so that Elocharis 


R. Br. (1810) becomes a synonym of Trichophyllum. 

T. aciculare (1..) Scirpus acicularis ., Eleocharis 
acicularis R. &. S. 

T. acuminatum (Muhl.) Eleocharis) acuminata (Muhl.) 
Nees 

T. albidum (Torr.) E. albida Torr. 

T. arenicolum (Torr.) E. arenicola Torr. 

T. atropurpureum (Retz.) E. atropurpurea (Retz.) Kunth. 

T. Baldwini (Torr.) E. Baldwinit (Torr.) Chapm. 

T. bicolor (Chapm.) E. bicolor Chapm. 

T. capitatum (L.) Schoenus captiatus L., Scirpus 
‘tenuis Willd., Eleocharis tenuis 
Schultes,. FE. capitaia (L.) R. 
Br 

T. cellulosum (Torr.) E. cellulosa Torr. 

T. Chaeiaria (R. & S.) E. Chaetaria R. & S. 

T. cylindricum (Buck1.) E. cylindrica Buckl. 

T. diandrum (C. Wr.) .E. dtandra C. Wright 

T. elongatum (Chapm.) E. elongata Chapm. 

T. Engelmanni (Steud.) E. Engelmanni Steud. 

T. antermedium (Muhl.) E. intermedia (Muhl.) Schultes 

T. intermedium var. Haberert War. Haberery Fernald 


(Fernald) 
T. interstinctum (Vahl) Scirpus interstinctus Vahi, Eleo- 
charis tnierstincta R, & §S, 


SRSA IGN ce 
4 


E: 
i 
ae 


ae ae ee ie 


yyy 


NYY 


A CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN GENERA 205 


. lanceolatum (Fernald) 
. maculosum (Vahl) 


monticolum (Fernald) 


. mutatum (L.) 


nodulosum (Roth) 


. ochreatum (Nees) 
. obtusum (Willd.) 


oblivaceum (Torr.) 
ovatum (Roth) 
palustre (1,.) 


Var. caluum (Torr.) 
Var. glaucescens (Willd.) 
Var. vigens (Bailey) 

. praticolum (Britton) 

. proliferum (Torr.) 

. Ravenelii (Britton) 

. Robbinsit (Oakes) 

. rostellatum (Torr.) 

. simplex (EIL.) 


Torreyanum (Boeckl.) 


. tuberculosum (Michx.) 
. tricostatum (Torr.) 


thermale (Rhydb.) 


. viviparum (Kunth) 


E. lanceolata Fernald 

E. maculosa (Vahl) R. Br. 

E. monticola Fernald 

E. muiata (L.) R. & S. 

E. nodulosa (Roth) Schultes 

E. ochreata (Nees) Steud. 

Scirpus capitatus Walt., Not L., 

Scirpus obiusus Willd., Eleo- 

charts obtusa Schultes. 
olivacea ‘Torr. 

. ovata (Roth) R. & S$. 

. palusiris (L.) R. &S. 


mh & 


E. praticola Britton 

E. prolifera Torr. 

E. Ravenelit Britton 

E. Robbinsit Oakes 

E. Rostellata Torr. 

Scirpus simplex Ell., Eleocharis 
simplex A. Dietr. Eleocharis 
tortilis (Link) Schultes. 

E. Torreyana Boeckl. 

E. tuberculosa (Michx.) R. & 8. 
E. tricostata Torr. 

E. thermalis Rydb. 

E. vivipara Kunth. 


44.—Hypopitys Ehrh., 1. ¢. 


The type is designated as Monotropa hypopiiys L. As a generic 


group this had already been recognized by Adanson in 1763. 


45.—CHAMAEMORUS Ehrh., 1. c. 


. The type is designated as Rubus chamaemorus 1. Some attempts 
have been made to segregate the genus Rubus, which contains, as 
is generally known, a number of distinct groups of species. Greene 
(Leaflets 1: 245. 1906) adopts the genus from Clusius, and it is 
apparently as worthy of recognition as a segregate of Rubus, as is 
Rubacer. (Bossekia Neck.) or Oreobatus Rydb, 


206 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Chamaemorus chamaemorus (L.) Rubus chamaemorus \. - 
Rubus nubis S. F. Gray. 
54-—Monantuium Ehrh., 1. c. p. 148. 


The type is designated as Pyrola uniflora . This is the type 
also of Moneses Salisb. (1821), and of Bryopthalmum E. Meyer 


(1839). 


Monathium uniflorum (L,.) Pyrola uniflora 1. Moneses grandi- 
flora S. F. Gray. 
Monathium reticulatum (Nutt.) Moneses reticulata Nutt. 


66.—HELIcTONIA Ebrh., 1. c. 


The type is designated as Ophrys spiralis L., Hence Ibidium, 
Gryostachys and Spiranthes are all synonyms. It has 
been pointed out by Niewland (Am. Mid. Nat. 3: 132. 1913) that 
Bauhin’s name for this genus, Triorchis, has keen properly published 
by Petiver in 1764, and is therefore the earliest generic name, since 
1753, for this orchidaceous genus which has been so variously 
designated within the past twenty years. To Doctor Niewland’s 
treatment I would add the following species: 

Triorchis vernalis (Engelm. & Gray) Sptranthes vernalis 
Engelm. & Gray, S. neglecta Ames, Gyrorostachys linearis 
Rydb., [bidium vernale House. 

Triorchis Becki (Lindl.) Spiranthes Becki Vindl., S. simplex 
A. Gray (not Griseb.), Gyrosiachys simplex Kuntze, S. 
grayt Ames, I[bidium Beckii House. Triorchts Grayt Niewul. 


Triorchis lacinata (Small) Gyrostachys lacinata Small. 

Triorchis longilabris (Lindl.) Spiranthes longilabris Lindl. 
S. brevifolia Chapm., Gyrosiachys brevifolia Kuntze. 

Triorchts ovalis (Lindl.) Spiranthes ovalis Lindl., S. cernua 
var. parviflora Chapm. G. parviflora Small 

Triorchts spiralis (Sw.) Satyrium spirale Sw. not [bidium 


spirale Salisb., Neottia toriilis Sw. Spiranthes tortilis \. 
C, Rich, J[bidium tortile House. 
Triorchis xyridifolia (Small) Gyrostachys xyridifolia Small - 
Triorchis tribola (Smail) Gyrostachys reverchonit Small 
Gyrostachys tribola Small, Tbjdj- 
um trilobum Small, 


76.—CARDIOPHYLLUM Ehrh., 1. e, 
The type is designated as Ophrys cordata I. This is congeneric 


: 
; 


A CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN GENERA 207 


Ophrys ovata L, the type of Ophrys, and the name Cardiophyllum 
takes its place with Listera as a synonym of Ophrys. 


78.—AETOPTERON Ehrh., 1. c. 

The type is designated as Polypodium aculeatum L. ‘This is the 
type of Polystichum Roth, and antedates the publication of that 
fern genus by several years. The species of the United States which 
should be considered under this name number about eight. A 
contemporary paper in which these species are transferred to 
Aetopteron, has been submitted for publication to the American 
Fern Journal. 


86.—CorNILLA Ehbrh., 1. c. 


This is but a slight change in spelling of Coronilla L., and the 
type species, Coronilla coronaia 1,., is also here designated as the 
type of Cornilla Ehrh. 


New York Siate Museum, 
Albany, N. Y. 


wee ae Se eee 


(yensnun) sp1o0;01 ON pig os1puy 
Sp10001 ONT potoplnoys-pay “AMLET 
Sp10de1 ON poysvaiq-asoy ‘YBaqso1ny 
y j ON ‘WoD 9 ‘AON S “AON I £ “AON PAT G-peatd “een 
sox ‘“WI0d SI ‘AON I -qyda@ seydeg . & I ‘ydasg youyploy 
Sp10001 ON ysva’yT ‘1aYO} COAT 
(jensnun) sp1ose1 ONT paysaig ‘1ayo} eA] 
Ke (yensnun) sp10oe1 ONT Japly ‘iyo ve ALT 
4 sp10o01 ON uvIpeoy ‘1ayo}yeIA[ YT 
< sax ‘“WOD gz ‘ydas I ‘ydag CHIdSQe rey, I “}dag IAIN 
4 ON 0D). SeV4ON POR 19G)". 8" PO I 1 ane 16) ading ‘your 
x: ‘Z‘vaq waesomy Sax “WoD gzjydag I1'}ydag €4dag z I ‘yd9g SUIMINOP, ‘SAO 
a Spi10d01 ON PPSslyAIIq 
Qa (jensnun) sp1o0ce1 ON Peliq-MO]TJIPA ‘OoxOND 
a Ssp10d01 ON Prliq-yoetg ‘ooyong 
a Sax "WO 97 °AON S1I‘}daG zi 4ydag iS ¢ -ydasg MOID 
a ON 21eY 6 “AON Zz “WO I Se -ydasg uMOIg ‘Iad9019 
*6°}00 uses AUPPT SOR “WOOD O="19@ = 41 des) cl 4des I z “‘ydasg piiqMmod 
a SoA ‘WOd Of “AON LPaloOp ViIPAdIO= ¢ -ydag dIpeAIIYD 
Y Spiooe1 ON , prqiepad 
a SAo ome “bs Ndeg .c dog. f-adag .-. € I "ydag paiq.eg 
= poenqriiysip AjapIm JON Se9A “WO QI “AON Soho ota S110) I QI *~O [eurIpieg 
Sp10991 ON sy MQog 
st sok ‘“uwlod S$ -ydasg b -ydag I € -ydasg yurjoqog 
ot SplovvI ON ~S9A “WOOD 6% OQ Sz ydeg_ 41 "ydag I £ -ydasg pagqen[d 
pesurm-pay ‘Pslqyovl ea 

swuvwau fnos xeau — outuios ‘eu, Huosaq frou arom Kumar 4814 91 auld 40 AWN 

paaiq Ht se0q = HST qu sem UUM WP PIP WAU AA SBM Hay MOY JNOGY SBM LAY M 


‘2 °S°D ‘SAOSNOHd@IV WAHLOUA AD 


‘GIGT J0 [fed aq wt “euerpuy ‘aureg asjoy ye paasosqg sparg 


208 


= UUINjNe Ul Ivjnzso1Iy Sax “WOOD II “AON bz ‘ydasg I zz “ydag Jadsaq ‘Morieds 
= ON o1ey Lz ‘AON OI “AON I L ‘AON daly, ‘mMor1edsS 
Ja}UIM [[@ Aejs Ma} W Sax “WOD 6z'aAoN EF 'ydag FH ydag_ £ -ydag 3u0g ‘moireds 
ON oaey 7zz-ydag 9 zz"ydag BUUBARS ‘MOLIEdS 
ON vey FI “AON I HI “AON xO ‘Morreds 
fA MOD, Oc AIO -t yGe9>, 11 -4deg,. -S € 4ydag PP ‘morredg 
Sax. ml0>: . Oc -4a@. TIM ideg- zr"3deg- Vv II yd9g suiddiyqg ‘moredsg 
ON ‘MOD Of ‘AON Fz'ydeg ve'WdeagG € Fz "Ydag : PpiiqmMous 
wa penqiijysip Ayyeso’T sax dI1BYy II “AON I II ‘AON peoyses3077 ‘ays 
= ON o1ey Lze-ydas Lz -4ydag z L1 "ydag layonsdeg 
A Spi10da1 ON peyodsg ‘1adtdpueg 
gy Sok “mop 1 ‘AON 1 °}deg 2 -ydag- o7 I ‘ydag uIqoy 
& ON sey Sri ydag vb S1‘4ydeg JAeISpoy 
= sox “ul0a)) Lz -yda¢ I }dasg Zz *4GaS e I dag poom ‘9oMog 
ay Ajie[Nsa111 spssig waIey 12 “pO 91 }dag I bi -ydag aqo0qd 
= Sox oey gz ‘ydasg vz “ydag I €z 4dag YoI9I9S ‘JMO 
a ON ey fz ‘4dasg I £2 -4da9 Piiq-usAO 
> Sp10901 ON preysio ‘aOlg 
spi0901 ON dOWMNI}eg ‘IO1IO 
a Sp10dseI ON posevoig-poy ‘yoyeyINN 
© sdk ‘mod Of ‘AON O1'}daG zI 4daSg I OI 3yd9G_ polsPvoIq-a1Iy MM “Woven 
rs SSA IOS) ve p00 Sl GaGa Sa das S fe 1daqey JIV[MOpeoy 
m Plodal ysaze ‘gz 3dag sax ‘WoD gz 3dag 6'}dag SI ‘}ydag of 6 *3dasg ding ‘une yy 
“a pomnqiiysip Ayjes0’y sax d1vy SI “AON CLAON. 22¢ II “AON pouioy sureag ‘y1e’y] 
ON aIey VI “AON I FI “AON peumoto-Aqny 4ysIu yy 
ON “Wop £¥F ‘09q L°aon £4 ‘AON I 9 ‘AON peu O1D-UsplOy “4YsIuUy 
; FI ‘AON Wae9s UaAIG Sax ‘WOOD VI'AON 6'}dag Fidag ¢ £ -ydag ID9p TIM 
Ajarel sposs1ig sley =O ‘AON C1 ‘ydag I z ‘ydag Isysysuly 
sox o1ey 11 3deg : II ydag I 6 ‘ydasg pirqsulyy 
S9X “WOD gz “AON I jdee, c3d50°  ¥ I ydag oniq ‘Aef 

suuvnay faox weou Yrourut09 ‘set Suosaq. gkoust = asm AUB 444 41 auld 40 GWYN 


paaiqyiseeq 4s], qt sem US 4I pip uayM SEM U2YA MOY 4yNOogyY sew Uey A 


210 


THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


(jensnun) sp1ode1 ON . 
6161 Ul Sp10de1 ON 
6161 UL Sp10d01 ONT 


SIA 
SIO]UIM PIU UI SARIS SoA 
ON 
soz 
ON 
ON 
‘ON 
ON 
= ON 
ON 
(yensnun) sp10da1 oN k 
ON 
ON 
SoA 
SoA 
sox 
ON 
ON 
ON 
ON 
P[Py yom & Ul usag ON 
SoA 
S$p10991 ON 
sox 
soz 
ON 
ON 


1u01}838 


SHUVAdY anok aeou 
: paraq 31 s90q 


“m0d 


‘mI0Dd 
IVY 
‘ml0D 
"m0D 
IBY 
mlOoD 
“mI0D 
"mI0Dd) 
a1ey 


“ULOD 
J1BY 
aIeY 
IBY 
att Colm) 
a1ey 
Jey 
“mLOD 
ae y 
d1BY 
“uL0D 


"m109 
JIB Y 
“"mIOD 
JIB Y 


jaaes 10 
uomiuI0D 
UST 


£ “po 
Lz -ydasg 


¥ 290 
€ -ydas 
6z “WO 
gz ydag 


juees 
. 388 
31 8BMm “a4 


Z£ °xO 


Sz ‘ydag 


gI dag 
C1 -ydasg 
Sz -ydasg 


juouui09 
@u1099q 


3! PIP Ua AA 


ge 


Li 


Li 


yd9S 
*ydag 
ydas 
*ydaS 
‘ydag 


*ydag 
ydaS 


*ydag 


*ydag 
ydag 


"ydag 
ee) 


*ydasg 
"4390 


ydasg 
‘ydas 


*ydaSg 


jueas 
4xau 41 


5 $ -ydag 
¢ € -ydag 
I € -ydag 
I I ‘ydaS 
I g ydas 
z Gz ‘ydas 
I gz ‘ydas 
8 oz 3dag 
I 
I oz *43daSg 
OI £1 ‘ydasg 
I gz ‘3dag 
I I yd9S9 
I gi ydag 
I Il ‘ydasg 
I £3190 
Sz ¢ 390 
I II “3d99 
I 8 “WO 
I £ °20 
I 9 ‘ydas 
6 C1 -ydag 
I £ -4ydasg 
¢ gI *3das 
I gz ‘ydag 
axdan RUBE cee 


sum UIYM MOY JNOGY 


pueylAreyy ‘}e014}-MOTIIA 
BuUlpore, ‘Us 

IdM “Wet 

asnoy ‘Wal 
popeoyq-poy ‘Ioyoodpoc 
Alepy ‘Iayoodpoom 
Aumoqd ‘Ioyood poo, 
wig ‘Ia[qieN 

wyeg ‘iqiey 

IAP ‘TOTqIVEM 
Blouse, ‘Io[qie MN 


oz‘jdag useID pa}e01y}-Yory]g ‘apqieM 


fod-Aoep_ ‘a}qIeM 
YM pue yourg_ ‘aqqrem 
pojseoiq-Aeg ‘toqiey 
po}eOIYI-MOT[SA ‘OIA 
Sulqie A ‘Oo1lA 
poAa-poy ‘OollA 

soyMOT, 

/ poyny ‘esnomjzy 
ELL 

payoeq-aAl[O ‘YysnsyL 
Vue “YSnIVL 
peayseyo-Aein ‘ysniyy, 
uMOSG ‘1ayseIy 

yopzeog ‘1oseueL 
AQuUNIYD ‘JIMS 

uleg ‘MOT[PMS 
pa}eo1yy-3yIG MY ‘MoredS 
peuMmodo-oyIy MM ‘MmorIeds 


auld 40 AWVN 


, 7 
ie 
Ci 
aaa 
i 
ele 
Sv 
a 
ann 
i taf 
an 


ane 


7 


erase) 


re 


be al een bees 


2% 


ne 


te ese G 


See 


ims a> alk 


se 


in ea Aen 


Sg ee 


Len Se ea ee bret 
© 7 == me 2 


LT AA a AS RR RRR 


ACE 


a 


NOTE 
Contributions on general and midland natural 
history will be gladly received. Papers on botany 
and allied subjects, zoology, geology and physical 
‘geography, should be addressed to the editor. 
Matters relating to advertisements are to be 
taken up with the secretary of the University. 
| One hundred reprints of articles averaging 
eight pages or» more will be furnished free of charge 
to contributors. More than one hundred separates can 
be obtained at cost price of the extras. When articles 
consist of less than eight pages, a certain number 
_ of copies of THe AMERICAN. MIDLAND NATURALIST in 
which the paper appeared will be supplied free, or 
the separate articles may, by arrangement with the 
editor, be kept until future papers average eight pages, . 
provided the contributions are sent in for the next 
consecutive issue for publication. Contributors of 
articles will receive a free subscription for the year 
in which their paper appears. For further or other 
information address 
THE Epiror, Notre Dame, Indiana 


\ 
) 


SS Sr Sra nS ra eed MS oT ede 


ee a 
Gniversity of Potre Dame 3 


NOTRE DAME, INDIANA - 


ene 


College of Arts and Letters. College of Engineering. 


Departments of Ancient Classics, | 


Modern Literature, _ History, 


' Political Economy, Sociology, 


Domestic Commerce, Foreign 
Commerce, Journalism, Library 


Departments of Civil Engineering, 


Mechanical Engineering, 


’ Electrical Engineering, Chemical 


Engineering, Mining Engineering, ~ 
Industrial Engineering. 


Science. 


College of Science. 
Departments of Chemistry, 
Physics, Biology, Pharmacy, 
Agriculture. 


College of Latw. 


Colle ¢ of Fine Arts. 
College of Architecture. Departments of Artistic Drawing, 


Departments. of Construction, Painting, Cartooning, Instrumental 
Design. Music, Vocal Music. 


St. Edward Hall. 
For Young Boys. 


Preparatory School. 


Variant Courses. 


Notre Dame is recognized by all educators, by the press and 
by the public as a college whose work is of the same grade as 
that of the most highly endowed colleges or the best state uniy- 
sities. Its atmosphere is strongly Catholic and no young man who 
has ever attended the University of Notre Dame can escape its 
influence in after life. 


Se oe oe ear Be ee eee See Seb eo ee Se Se aes Sear Sse 


The discipline is paternal, and aims at giving young men the 
fullest liberty consistent with earnest study and manly Chnistian 
character. Rooms at reasonable rates. Catalogue sent on 
application. 


Address: 
THE: REGS aR ACR: 


NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


ott, MIDLAND 
NATURALIST 


Devoted to Natural History, Primarily 
that of the Prairie States 


———— 


Published by the University of Notre Dame, 
SEP ot 1% 


Notre Dame, Indiana 


- J, A. NIEUWLAND, C.-S.C., Ph. D., Sc. D., Editor *"! 


3 
Be 

: CONTENTS 

= : - 

= Variation in Nacreous Color of Certain Species of Naiades 

4 Inhabiting the Upper Ohio Drainage and their Corres- 

= ponding Ones in Lake Erie. (Plates I II, IIT.) 
z * : RO N= Gri2r;- Ph. D&.2T1 
. Dr. Joel Lunelf. (Frontispiece ) 3 243 
2 “Waterfowl in Nebraska.”’ Brother Alphonsus, C. S.C?- 245 
3 : 

3 A ee 

| PRICE $1.50 A YEAR SINGLE NUMBERS 30 CENTS 


FOREIGN, 6s. 6d. 


ya Ae UY Sayers 
Pek ¥ 


Entered as second-class matter at Notre Dame, Indiana. Acceptance for mailing at special 
rate of postage provided for in section 1103, Act of October 3, 1917, 
authorized on July 3, 1918. 


THE UNIVERSITY PRESS, NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


Back Numbers of “The eee Midland Naturalis.” a 


Vol. I.—(1909-1910) “293 p ' TF WO nie et at em ee Ci St 
Vol. II.—(1gti-1912). 330 pp. Unbound and- exclusive of 3 sey seem 
to be bound tiwend: oF Vola Ah ee ee eee 
Inclusive of Three Reprints (see Pact. Es trae Ae ee Se 


Vol. II1.— (1913-1914). 383 pp. Unbound, exclusive of Reprint No. 4. 
(See below). [Nos. 1, 2, 3, 7.) are scarce and nearly out of print, 


COStin'g 50 Cisseache\..5 ee aie ae oe Se ee, eT ogi ried ae ee 
Inclusive of Reprint: Not 4; extra ckea eR tae 
Vol-l¥.—(19 95-1016) 4 Unbound... fe a ees ee ; 
Vol. V.-(1917-1918). Unbound. 2022s sehr g een ied a SP . 
Lara aa 75 pet 
| Publications. 
Haun, W.- Analytic Study of Faunal Changes in Indiana, 2 plates, 
1Q1O, 27 Ppt week BE eee ee tg a 
GREENE, E. lL. Leaflets of Botanical “Observation and Criticism. 
2-vols -Completé. (1903-1912)... eee 6.00 = 


Cybele Columbiana, A series of Studies in Botany, 
. chiefly North American. No. 1.. (Other num- 


s 


berstofovlow) Zanotti OE oe Sy 1 ; 
a iss Pittonia, A series of Papers Realting to Bore and * 
Botanists, 5 vols=(1887—1905).-2-. oe Se 14.00 ? 
: if Flora Franciscana, Parts I, II, III. [Part IV pub- a 
lished long after the other parts, is quite fe 
unobtainable, as all copies not immediately Be 
distributed seem to have been lest in the San aaa 
Francisco fire.| Price as published_z...22.0. 2.00 _ Bs 
4s Manual of the Botany of the Region of San Fran- & 
cisco Bay (1894). Bound cloth 22. 2.00. 4 
Unbotinds. 22 7, eo OS Ere eS ee ee ‘1.50 3 
(Price as published of latter) 0.202.002. 2.00. 
UTTERBACK, W. I. Naiades of Missouri, 200 pp. 29 pl and-some text ~~ ® : 
Gigiiresis =. ape OP nea Coe oa a eae ea ee B2e a5 
: * 
Reprints. | 
RAFINESOUE; C.:S. — Neogenyton, (825): eS ee $125 
a uf The Natural Family of the Carexides (1840)........ 50 
x; i Scadiography or 100 Genera of Ombelliferous 
Plants ete (Gr 3aG ia 0 S5 0 ais es eee 1.50 


Monographie des Coquilles Bivalves et Fluvia- 
tiles de la Riviere Ohio. Remarques sur les 
Rapports Naturels des Genres Viscum, Samolus 
et Viburnum: A’ Bruxelles: (1820)... 1.50 
LeConTE, J. B. Reprints of Monographs without plates, $2.50; with 
42 photographic copies of unpublished plates 
(7x8), $25.00; with colored photographic plates...$37.50 
LEContE, J. &. Two extra plates reproduced from originalsin N: Y. 
Bot. Garden: Colored, $1.50; uncolored......<:..:.1.0C 


Dr. Forel Lunell 
Born, Mare 30, 1851 Died, May 27, 1920 


The American Midland Naturalist... 


PUBLISHED BI-MONTHLY BY THE UNIVERSITY 
OF NOTRE DAME, NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


VG. Vi: JULY-SEPTEMBER, 1920. NOS. 10, 11 


Variation in Nacreous Color of Certain Species of Naiades Inhabiting 
the Upper Ohio Drainage and their Corresponding Ones in Lake Erie. 


BY N. M. GRIER, PH. D. 


I.— INTRODUCTORY AND STATEMENT OF PROBLEM. 


Perhaps the greatest amount of the systematic study of color in 
any animal group has been given to the birds, where the demand for 
a more accurate color terminology in describing the hues of pluma- 
ages eventually resulted in the Ridgeway Color Standards and 
Color Nomenclature, (14),—a scientific achievement apparently 
but little appreciated by others than ornithologists. Other types 
of animals, such as the Insects and even the Gastropods have been 
by no means neglected at least from the standpoint of variation in 
color pattern, but the fresh water mussels, (Naiades), so far as the 
writer is aware have not been the subject of any but more incidental 
observation. 

One who has formed some acquaintance with any scientific 
work dealing with color nomenclature, must become impressed 
with the apparent glittering generalities in the specific description 
of shells so far as epidermal and nacreous color are concerned, 
but lest it be thought there exist no justification for this seeming 
slovliness on the part of the student of the Naiades, it need only 
be pointed out that in the case of birds at least, they are probably 
less numerous in collection, species for species, than mussel shells. 
Moreover, they possess a distinct advantage in that their plumage 
colors are usually arranged in a definite color pattern, or so asso- 
ciated with sexual or other characters that the ornithologist may 
well use them more accurately for descriptive purposes, than the 
conchologist can with the data he even may more laboriously 
collect. There has thus been a proportionate development of the 


212 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


study of color as one or the other group of naturalists found 
essential for constructive work. 

The writer’s interest in the Naiades has been ecological as well 
as systematic. In other papers, (3, 4, 5,), dealing with the Naiades 
he has attempted to associate certain morphological features of 
the shells with the physical conditions under which they lived. 
A definite change of morphological features was found to parallel 
changes in physical conditions. Morphological features of shell 
are to the systematist, descriptive characters, as are also epidermal 
and nacreous colors. It would therefore be worth while to look 
for changes in the latter also to complete the idea of parallelism, 
and if at the same time, some progress could be made toward 
systematizing the color nomenclature as existing now in the 
Naiades so much the better—especially if ‘such could be done with 
regard to any existing accepted scientific terminology, such as 
that of Ridgeway. With this preliminary hint of the two-fold 
scope of the observations to be given and the ultimate basis from 
which it proceeded, we pass to a digest of the literature only with 
which we are concerned, (the species dealt with in this paper), 
as it is felt that the citation of even more fragmentary observations 
about the other species of Naiades can add but little. At the same 
time, it may be pointed out that in itself the literature cited largely 
illustrates points which are the basis of conclusions later to be 
taken. 

Wilson and Clark, (18-19), state that Unio gibbosus (Elliptio 
dilatatus), and Lampsilis, (Eurynia) rectus have a greater percent- 
age of white nacre going down stream, (Maumee Drainage). Soft 
water and amount of humic acid in the upper waters may favor a 
purplish deposit, while colorless forms which occur shortly after 
limestone beds are reached, may be found where there is an excess 


of abundance of lime. . . . The rosy hue of Quadrula coccinea, 
(Pleurobema coccineum) seems to be of a different nature going 
down stream . . . the majority of this species from the Maumee 


are white, few with a rosy nacre. Quadrula-rubiginosa, (Fusconaja 
flava) for the most part is white, but some are yellowish rosy. 
In this drainage 2-3 of Unio gibbosus are white. Lampsilis rectus 
had a purple nacre in some streams, white in others. In the Kan- 
kakee Drainage, (19), upstream, Quadrula ‘coccinea was found 
to be of a delicate pink color, lower down becoming white, while 
all shells of Elliptio in the upper part of the Kankakee Basin are of 


. al 


. 
:. 
: 


VARIATION IN NACREOUS COLOR OF NAIADES 213 


a deep purple color. Utterback, (16), found that the nacre of 
Elliiptto was darker in upstreams sections fading out toward the 
mouth confirming Wilson and Clark’s observation. He addition- 
ally points out that of Quadrula verrucosa that the pink nacred 
shells are confined to southern Missouri; of Pleurobema obliquum 
cati!lus that in the Gasconade it has a white nacre, while in the 
Osage River it is pink. Wilson and Clark further, (18), the color 
of Anodonta grandis is in 1% tne cases dark purple, the other half 
creamy white. There may be added a curious observation of 
Israels on Unio crassus, that the epidermis of females were 
usually of a gray color, while that of the males were red. 

Following the clues given in the foregoing, effort will be made 
in this paper to throw light on the following problems connected 
with the color of nacre in species of Naiades dealt with, viz; 

I. In those species commonly assigned more than one charactertstic 
nacre color, to determine as far as possible the relative prevalance of 
each color in all the shells as a whole, and the difference between L. 
Erie and Upper Ohio shells in this regard. 

II. To determine whether any change in nacreous color takes 
place going down siream, both in the rivers and their tributaries, 
and to learn whether in any of the species, a particular shade of the 
described nacre color 1s peculiar to the bady of water concerned. 

III. To associate as far as possible certain shades of the described 
nacre color with the sex of the animal in each of the species dealt with. 


II.—List oF SpEcIES USED. 


LAKE ERIE UPPER OHIO DRAINAGE 
1. Fusconaja flava parvula ,Grier. Fusconaja flava, Raf. 
2. Amblema plicata, Say. Amblema costata, Raf. 
4. Pleurobema obliquum pauperculum, Pleurobema obliquum coccineum, 
Simpson. Con. 
3. Elliptio dilatatus sterkii, Grier. Elliptio dilatatus, Raf. 
5. Syphynota costata eriganensis, Grier Symphynota costata, Raf. 
6. Anodonta grandis footiana, Lea. Anodonta grandis, Say. 
7. Paraptera alata, Say. Paraptera alata, Say. 
7. Paraptera fragilis, Raf. Paraptera fragilis, Raf. 
8. Proptera alata, Say. Proptera alata, Say. 
9. Anodontoides ferrus-subcylind. Lea. Anodontoides ferrussacianus Leo. 
Io Eurynia recia, Lam. Eurynta recta latissima, Raf. 
11, Lampsilis luteola rosacea, Dekay. Lampsilis luteola, Lam. 
12. Lampsilis ovaia conadensis, Lea. Lampsilis ovata ventricosa, Lam. 


The accompanying map and list of localities showing the collect- 
ing stations will give some idea of their distribution in the Upper 


214 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


~ 


Ohio Drainage and Lake Erie. The material used was collected 
by Dr. A. E. Ortmann over a number of years, (1903-07), in Western 
Pennsylvania and Lake Erie, or secured by him in smaller amount 
as exchanges. Dr. Ortmann, besides suggesting the value of an 
introductory study to the color problem in Naiades, has done 
everything in his power to assist the investigation, for which data 
was obtained at the Carnegie Museum, Pittsburgh. I am also 
indebted to Dr. W. J. Holland, Director of the Carnegie Museum 
for the freest use of its facilities in connection. 


IIJ.—PuysicaL CONDITIONS AND TYPE OF MuSSEL FAUNA. 


The type of Mussel Fauna has already been admirably treated 
in papers by Walker, (17) and Ortmann, (12). These and the 
physical conditions concerned have already been summarized by 
the writer elsewhere, (5); the latter are ably given for L. Erie by 
Jennings (8), and for the Upper Ohio Drainage in the Water 
Supply papers of the U. S. Geological Survey (6). For sake of 
convenience, however, the outstanding points concerning the 
physical conditions are given in the following, contrasting columns. 


LAKE ERIE UPPER OHIO DRAINAGE 


Water colder than in Upper Ohio, 
but with more even regulation of tem- 
perature. Currents much less rapid 
than in streams, less agitated, except 
by very moderate currents, carrying 
but little sediment. Bottom pebbles 
or sand or mixture of these, depending 
on region of lake, with coarser sedi- 
ment derived from wear of land. 
Temperature conditions favor a more 
uniform production of food, while 


Water warmer, but greater extremes 
of temperature to face. Streams more 
rapid than current of L. Erte; greater 
agitation, frequent falls and rapids, 
short stretches of quiet pools. River 
carry a load of debris moving quickly 
over the bottom which consists of 
mud, glacial fill, cobbles. Food 
conditions, (due to extreme of tem- 
perature), are less stable, even if 
at times food is more abundant. 


the water contains more lime. 


It may be added that L. Erie shells as a whole have been observed 
to possess brighter (clearer) colors than their fellows of the Upper 
Ohio Drainage, are exceptionally polished, and otherwise charac- 
terized in distinction by their well developed lines of growth. Dr. 
Walker in a letter to the writer, (1914) suggested that certain 
depauperate qualities of the L. Erie shells may be due to the chemi- 
cal quality of the water, pointing out that the influence of brackish 
water upon fluviatile species is well known. The relation of this 
fact to the color problem will be dealt with later. 


" 
; 


Se ro See ae ee 


Pn Te 


VARIATION IN NACREOUS COLOR OF NAIADES 215 


IV.—METHOD. 


As previously indicated, the nacreous color of the Naiades does 
not readily lend itself to the determination of any well defined 
color pattern. The writer therefore confined his efforts to the 
tabulation of the nacreous colors of each species of shell by means 
of comparisons with the standard colors given in the Ridgeway 
Color Nomenclature. Usually but one color was recorded—that 
one most impressing the eye with its vividness and preponderance 
in the nacre. Where the number of shells from a locality was 
small, sometimes 2-3 colors were recorded, but only if they appeared 
to be of equal tone in the shell. Such data was later useful in trac- 
ing genetic relationship in the sequence of color change. The 
color or colors judged most to match were then written in figuring 
‘books opposite calculations previously made for the morphological 
features of each shell. Shell were rejected when erosion of the 
nacre was such that no definite determination of nacre color could 
be made. Asa rule, white as a color was not recognized when there 
existed a fair suspicion that another color was the original one, 
for scientifically speaking, white is a combination of colors, and 
usually the writer was able to refer whitish shades to pearl blue 
and closely similar colors. 

Where a large number of shells from one locality were concerned, 
it was the usual practice to group all the shells of a closely similar 
nacre color, and compare as a whole with the shades in Ridgeway. 
By this means, a general or average hue was obtained, not accurate 
of course for every shell, but very convenient in determining the 
relative color of the shells at the locality to ones near it, above 
or below in the particular body of water. As a rule these relative 
colors were taken from a fairly large number of shells—8 in most 
cases, although lack of material often completed the use of smaller 
numbers. Against such treatment, however, was the check of a 
separate color comparison for each shell. 

By means of the method above described, it was possible to 
determine for each species, a shade of nacre color peculiar to the 
locality where the shell had been collected, and this being done 
charts were prepared showing the sequence of color or color 
changes passing down stream, or the distribution in different 
parts of the same body of water. This data is presented in Plate 
III. Even by this process of condensation, a very large number 
of colors were obtained for each species, making it imperative to 


216 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


simplify further in order that the evidence for the relative preva- 
lence of different nacreous colors in those species where more than 
one was described, might be rendered more intelligible for report. 
Just as the systematist for roughly descriptive purposes has picked 
out a number of the more prominent nacreous colors of each 
species, the writer, largely following Simpson’s Descriptive Cata- 
logue of the Naiades(15), chose from the previously prepared charts, 
' the 5-15 ‘‘leading colors’’ in the nacreous color of each species, to 
which the large majority of the rest could be assigned. Percentages 
of these leading colors were then calculated for each species in the 
bodies of water, drainages, groups of drainages in which they were 
found, as best seemed to throw light on the problems to be attacked. 
While all recorded shades in a large number of the species would 
not conform to this treatment, they represent percentages in the 
extreme minority. These may be inferred to exist in those species 
where the table on ‘‘ Distribution of Colors as a Whole,’’ does not 
add up to 100%. Strictly speaking, even this comparatively large 
number of ‘‘leading colors’’ could have been condensed to a smaller 
number, but a larger number was necessary in order that certain 
close distinction in the color of nacre for purposes of the investiga- 
tion might be made, for example, between the color of shells of a 
river and those of its tributaries. In the discussion of any particular 
body of water, however, when the latter is considered by itself, 
the leading colors given represent my reduction to lowest terms. 
of the colors represented in it. 


V.—RESULTS. 


Each species is dealt with separately, there first being given in 
parallel columns, 

(a) Descriptive material concerning the nacreous color as taken 
from Simpson (15). 

(b) The equivalent in the writer’s opinion of the Simpson colors 
in terms of the Ridgeway Color Nomenclature. 

It is felt that by this arrangement, and the inferences to be 
drawn from the names of the Ridgeway Colors themselves, it 
will be possible for the reader to sufficiently understand the 
terminology used as to convey the principles this paper hopes 
to make clear. For the sake of even greater clarity, there are also 
given latterly in the Ridgeway column, the peculiar shades of the 
Lake Erie shells, although these are, by the convenient arbitracy 


VARIATION IN NACREOUS COLOR OF NAIADES Psy | 


arrangement adopted, but varieties of the hues given in the tables, 

n ‘‘Distribution of Colors as a Whole in the latter of which, 
effort is made to throw light on the first problem stated. There 
then follows tables of percentages giving the relative distribution 
of colors in the Upper Ohio Drainage as a whole, and separately, 
its component drainages. The same is done for Lake Erie and its 
various collecting stations. After remarks largely in explanation 
of outstanding points of Plate III, (chart illustrating sequence 
of nacreous color changes; Problem IIL, the discussion of each 
species terminates with the evidence for possible association of 
Sex Correlative Coloration with the nacreous color of the shell. 


1.—Fusconayja flava. 


SIMPSON RIDGEWAY 
White to Pearl blue, Pale Grayish Blue Violet, Pale Medici Blue 
Salmon; Pale Pinkish Cinnamon, Pale Pinkish Buff, Light Flesh 
Pink. 
Rose tinted. Light Orange Pink, Light Salmon Orange. 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Drainage and 
L. Erie. (273 shells.) 


Raleigh Crinanmon aid allied ucolorsi yt) sly le) et a 21% 
Pal em mks bettie aay alliedy COLOTS) 8 hic eS) yo BA oe ea ee 13% 
Haent Oratice Pink and allied. cdlars.-7 ..! 3... Do ee ee 11% 
Palen Groyish  Bilwe., Violet vandallied colors 2s ee ee 25% 
Reare biltiestamevallieds colons s\iiien fina Oi ae ae eae ee So, a 10% 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio ey 
(225 shells) 


Pueweimkish Cinnamon andyallied: colors... 922 t10 tse. oe ge ee 27% 
PAlewe mich tiie ana allredheolors.s 2 hoe ee eee 23% 
Met @Orances Pink wand! alltédm colors iis seo sea ee 16% 
BaleiGrayish Blue yViolet and allied)colors)..2 3 ee ee 17% 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Tributaries, etc. 


Alle’ny Alle’ny Mon'g. Mon’g. Ohio Ohio Tusca. 
Tribs. River Tribs © River Tribs. River River 


Balik, « Crminamone ete cessor, 21). 62:9 u a AW, LOO Ups Olga 
PalewbPink) Bitte etes wie ee vee Din ON <6 7 Ouest mae: a be} OE ae AM a 25 %..-50% 
Light Orange Pink, etc. ..:..... DO) Ey eta kD Mead iiss ot Oe SOG gee bee BO ernie 
Pee Grayn mle Niolety ele: sum ag C7 uel. cul ol, Ae ME rake Ree 50% 
Pale, GraywWavender eter et) OX AED MOEA? ADS eRe a Ooch ENS 
Weener, selenimosa Pinkie ed ets ere. sett EN Ate 2 dae be tie GS A Aaa See De 
Distribution of Colors as a Whole in L. Erie. (67 shells). 
Sebeauh taiiemameaalicurecminrsi Si oo hh Vr aM le eda. re Oe 
Pict eshebiie tat deallieds colors... 2 ot he wee lee heen ee le 18% 
Pale Gray. Blue Violet and allied colors._............... Get A LP Sia 14% 


218 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Distribution in L. Erie—localities. 
La Plaisance Cedar Presque 


Bay Paint Isle Bay 
Pearl Blue and allied colors... 17 Aee Mee EIRE ED Wore n/N OES CST 
Light Salmon Orange and allied colors. .... sti eee A 67 Gr eae 14% 
Light Gray. Bley Viol--andeallieds colors 50,97, eee 33% 
Medici Biite and allieds colors ee ie Sy ee 330; eee 
Meittehieshs Pinkrand alive d&eolors ie sce ce e teeta ip meer een 33% 
1 Dyfed a gel 850 b ote ae a RO maaPame VEL Nees A eo DCN VUELOS AE Ores VOCS Ce ohh RR Coleg 8% 


Deductions from Tables of Percentages and Plate IIT: 


It will be immediately noted that bluish colors are more promi- 
nent in L. Erie than in the Upper Ohio Drainage. Reddish colors 
also tend to have lighter hues in the former. Colors of a buffy or 
orange tone rather than pinkish, are most abundant in rivers, where 
grayish colors also seem to predominate. The intensity of the nacre 
color seems to diminish in the river especially going down stream. 
Exceptions to this are in the minority. 


In the Upper Ohio Drainage: 

In Crooked Creek, Creekside, the shells are mainly light grayish 
blue violet, but lower down at Rosston, are of a light salmon, fading 
at a near station on Allegheny River, Kelly, to pale salmon. A 
progressive fading out may be traced down the latter stream, as 
well as in a tributary of the Mononghela, Dunkard Creek. The 
shells of the Monongahela at this point are much like those of 
Dunkard Cr. but not as red, (pale pinkish cinnamon). As the Ohio 
is approached, the nacre becomes yellowish, (pale pinkish buff), 
and finally fades to grayish hues. In 10 mi. Cr. at Amity, the shells 
take on a grayish lilac hue, but at Clarksville this becomes con- 
siderably lightened to reddish colors. In Raccoon Cr. this species 
has a nacre color of reddish pink, at the nearest collecting point 
in Ohio it has a yellow tinge. 


In Lake Erte: 

Presque Isle is characterized by greater proportions of salmon 
colors. La Plaisance Bay by those of a bluish caste, Cedar Point, 
orange. In this, as well as other species, different parts of the 

* IT found no strickly pure white in this species. It seemed practically 


negligible or is represented in the lighter allied colors of Pale Grayish Blue 
Violet. 


' 


VARIATION IN NACREOUS COLOR OF NAIADES 219 


same collecting locality—such as the various stations at Presque 
Isle, are apt to show a peculiarly distinctive nacreous color. 


Observation on Sex Correiative Coloration as Associated with 
Nacreous Color.* (27 Shells). 


Blues and Allied colors are twice as numerous in males than in 
females. Females appear to have the more vivid pinks, while those 
males even approximating the latter colors have reddish hues. 


2.—Amblema Plicata 


In this species, particular attention was paid to the prevailing 
hue of the iridescence at the posterior end, as the rest of the shell 
is whitish. The rusty spots common in this species were ignored. 

SIMPSON RIDGEWAY 
Iridescence—Bluish Pearl Blue, 
Grayish Lavender, Pale Verbena Violet 
Pale Vinaceous, Pale Salmon, 
White. 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Drainage and 
Lake Erie. (185 shells). 


eat Wate Men Gea) COLOKS! ho en A 44% 
(Chayishbayender and-alliedcolorsi:.2 sre a ees le ee 22% 
Bate awminaceous. and: alliedecolorss) 2.105 8 oo A ee a es 1.30% 
UN eas AED RSET ah gaat. WIR a lta, < SR ites Sa oae ae REALM e see AAP NEUE BNR Dr € 200K 5. 4% 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Drainage 
(107 shells). 


Hemmer bluewariey allied colar sis. 200 as ee ee 45% 
Crayicimwavenderrand allied colors: 25-2. 2. en ee ed ee ee 19% 
Pale Vinaceous and allied colors.....2002002022--eeeeeeeee Riemn M iM GAL! 36% 
Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Tributaries, etc. 
Alle’ny Alle'’ny Beaver Beaver Ohio 

Tribs. River Tribs. River River 

Pearl Blue and allied colors__..____.. Op ae Big pe ZOU ow apas. 33% 


Beare bitte; and allied) colorst ise: J 25.20 eee ee ee a aan 50% 
Pale Vierbenae Violet and allied) colors. 0.0. ee eee 33% 
Graver Wavenger atid allieducolors. 2.) te en eS oe 11% 


Pale Salmon 


* The small number of shells on which this and similar observations for 
other species is due to the fact that most of the shells were collected before 
Ortmann’s discovery that the sex of these animals is readily determined 
from cell structure. 


220 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Distribution in Lake Erie—Localities. 


Presque Isle ' Cedar La Plaisance 

' Bay Point Bay 
Pearl Blue and allied colors -....-.....2........--- SY Araneae TOOUG eee 20% 
Pale Ver. Violet and allied colors....._......... 37 Woah ne ee ee 
Paget UPmk. Viol. and ‘allied colors... 22) 5°) 07 oe eee eee 80% 
Pale Salmon and allied colors......222000.0-.---.- 6 pb ts Pe ie DO 


Deductions from Tables of Percentages and Plate IIT. 


Pearl blue is most largely represented in Lake Erie. Colors in 
the Upper Ohio tend to be grayish in-nature, those corresponding 
in L. Erie, more of a violet. 


In the Upper Ohio Drainage: 

Pearl blue is more prominent in the Allegheny River than in its 
tributaries, and is more abundant in the Beaver than in the 
Allegheny. The nacreous color apparently tends to acquire deeper 
tones in the lower stretches of both the Allegheny and the Shenago. 
Altho’ pearl blue is recorded at its lowest station, grayish lavender 
would be a composite shade characterizing shells from French 
Creek, where the pale verbena violet of the upper stretches fades to 
pearl blue lower down. A similar fading is seen in the Shenango, 
whose shells are more of a blue compared with its sister river, the 
Mahoning, where they tend to take on a lilac tinge. Perhaps shells 
really coming from the Mahoning were the ones of this species 
obtained in the Beaver River. In Slippery Rock Creek, the shells 
are pearl blue, in the Ohio River, pale grayish vinaceous. 

In Lake Erte: 

A bluish violet color characterizes the shells obtained at Cedar 
Point. This shade accompanied by pinkish violet is distinctive for 
Presque Isle, while pinkish violets are in the great majority at La 
Plaisance Bay. Examination of Pl. III shows more fully the 
variability at Presque Isle. 


Observation on Sex Correlative Coloration as Associated with Nacreous 
Color. (19 shells). 
Females appear to be prevailingly pearl blue, while the males are 
characterized by pale vinaceous colors. The amount of grayish 
lavender represented is equivalent in both. 


3.—Elliptio dilatatus 


SIMPSON RIDGEWAY 
Deep purple. Light Vinaceous Lilac, Light Vinaceous 
Purple, Deep Vinaceous, Deep Vinaceous 


¢ 


VARIATION IN NACREOUS COLOR OF NAIADES 2211 


Lavender, Deep Vinaceous Gray, Dark 
Vinaceous Gray. 

Salmon, Straw colored Pale Ochraceous Buff. 

White* Pearl Blue, white. 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Drainage and 
Lake Erie. (561 shells). 


Pearlebivenwithualed colors. ey ale) so Nill amie ee ee le eee Nae 18% 
Eient vassecous, ilac and allied’ colors ee 28% 
Mightrvinaceous: Purple and: allied\icolors22 22208 3 ee eee ee 27% 
Deep svanaceous Gray ‘and allied=colors 24) ee eee 20% 
Pales Ochraceous ‘But andi allied colors: 2.<-3.e 05% 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Drainage 
(509 shells). 


Reogimplicraid alli eds Colors eee ss. err eens Or ge se ee 11% 
MivktaVvinaceous ilac) atc: sallieds colors 2s. 5 tue 5 ahr oe lee ee pee 22% 
tehtaVvinaccous' Purple andeallied’colorse oe A ane 25% 
Bape rap wate) allaed. COlOts: sem 22 pee meee Ee ee 12% 
PatcsOchraccous htt, andnalliedycolorse:.. a ee es ee 6% 


Distribution of Colors in Upper Ohio Tributaries, ete. 


Alle’ny Alle’ny Mon'’g Mon'g Ohio Ohio Beaver Beaver 
Tribs. River Tribs. River Tribs. River Tribs. River 


Bearhebitie Meter is 2208 o 9 weer 7 fa 97 elt Ne TA Foe OHTA Ol 
ihe Vins ealac etes inno. 42:5. 27, 33 Ane 56 one sol, 
Might Vin. \Purple)ete::.37 %.-.35 %o.-14 %....60 %--..36 %.:.. 30%... 50% 1k % 


Ment veurple Drab Ti ieee TDN ee AGI we Lacan OF lie Reh Puakee 10. 722A, 
Distribution of Colors as a Whole in L. Erie. (52 shells).’ 
MigiteVvinaccois Purplerand allied colors = 25-3 Ses SS te eae eee 27% 
Peep Vvanaceous, lavender and allied colotse 229 23.) See es 30% 
Deepy Vinaceous, Gray and-allied colors#.. 220s) ee eee ae 23% 
Darkr Vanaceaus: Gray. and’ allied jcolors. is ee ee ae es 18% 


Distribution in Lake Erie—Localities. 


Presque La Plaisance 

Isle Bay 
Pree Via CeOlISMeTIT let. mana e cee eae ie el a ei 20 Gia Nae oe 20% 
Weep ew imareonse Wavenc else... se OT ee» yale or Lee 36 Gs ees 10% 
WecpreVattaceoncy Giese 5 tke esa ese ak a on BOO prs) ree 50% 
Darke Vinmaceous Grae Lewes oe ee ee ee LOS Gis see alo 20% 


Deductions from Tables of Percentages and Pl. III. 


Although pearl blue is represented in L. Erie, the percentage 
seems small. The colors of the Upper Ohio Drainage seem to be 
more of a purple lilac, while those of L.. Erie are more of a lavender 
gray. There is at least a distinct lightening of nacreous color in 
Lake Erie. 


*White was found to occur less than 1% in all the shells examined. 


= 


222 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


In the Upper Ohio Drainage: 

As a general thing the colors are lighter in the rivers than in the 
tributaries. This species is exceedingly variable with regard to 
nacre color. A general tendency to lighten in color may be observed 
coming down the Allegheny thus confirming Wilson and Clark’s 
and Utterback’s observations. It is true, however that at certain 
stations it appears to darken, but this result is from a small num- 
ber of shells. Such apparently also occurs in French Creek, but the 
shells of the Allegheny are lighter than those of French Creek at the 
nearest collecting point. Pearl blue is largely limited to the Al- 
legheny River and its tributaries. Nacreous colors, are lighter in the 
Monogahela than in its tributary, the Cheat. They also tend to 
lighten in the Ohio River, but in the Shenango at the headwaters 
they are deep vinaceous, (reddish purple), in hue, lower down 
becoming more purplish. Characteristic Stream Colors appear to be, 

Purple drab for Potato Cr. 

Light Purple Drab for Sandy Cr. 

Vinaceous colors for Cheat River. 

Light Vinaceous Purple drab in Neshannock Cr. 

Light reddish to light purples in the Mahoning, lower down 
becoming purplish lilac to slate purple. 

Vinaceous Gray is characteristic of the Ohio. 

In Lake Erie: 

Presque Isle stands out for its large amount of reddish purple 
shades, while La Plaisance Bay has grayish purple ones. The great 
variability of Presque Isle shells may again be noted. Those from 
other L. Erie localities than those given in L. Erie are so small that 
percentages are not given. 

In Chautauqua Lake the shells appear to be mainly white. 


Observation on Sex Correlative Coloration, etc. (15 shells). 
More males have a pearl blue nacre than females. They also 
have a larger percentage of lilac shades. Females seem to be 
characterized by a deeper purple color, and a greater number of 
lilac shades. 
4.—Pleurobema obliquum coccineum 


SIMPSON RIDGEWAY 
Rose-Pink Pale Vinaceous Pink, Light Ochraceous 
Salmon, Orange Pink. 
- Whitish-red* Pearl Blue, Venetian Pink, Light Pearl Blue, Burn Blue 


* Pure whites appear to be negligible among the shells I examined. 


< 


VARIATION IN NACREOUS COLOR OF NAIADES Popa 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Drainage and 
L. Erie. (263 shells). 
Beane litemariel yallie diteolors® Ys: tee vein x ieee AE eee eee 44% 


Palen inaccotisme td ke arid allreds colorseic te: ok F Se aoa ge ee 18% 
Mentetaatl writer ata tal em cGOlOrs see 2001s eu tly oe ely Ts a ke ooh 20% 
ie Ocktaceous Salmon and’ allied colors’. 2k, 8% 
Distribution of Colors in Upper Ohio Drainage (247 shells). 
Pera bine witt-athed colors it. oe so 48% 
Menetiatimb itis wwithy allied "COlOrserit meters ota es oe Ye Nee 30% 
ale Mittaccots (Pink ait, dived ‘calors.\!40.) 028 es he 14% 
Richt Ochraceotis) salmon jand allied: colores. a ee 8% 
Distribution of Colors in Upper Ohio Tributaries etc. 
; Alle'ny Alle’ny Beaver Beaver 
Tribs. River Tribs. River 
Pearl Blue and allied colors-___........... GR Gee ees 247 hel ae Pe Bopanna 46% 
Venetian Pink and allied colors... TO Oise eee a Oy eee 1B) Bip eens 38% 
Pale Vinaceous Pink and all col........7%.--.-.-.-- TOs eee 2 13 Opie ees 
(Light Ochraceous Salmon & all col... TAO po eee Tyee eee 2O Ge ee 15% . 
Distribution of Colors as a Whole in L. Erie, 
Pale ‘Vinaceous. Pile and Jaliiedcolors. 0.2 45% 
Pitts Sltiey ands allaedieolorsee t-te ee ne Dees Se es tee 33.5 
Meanee Pink and. aled ,COlLS «5410 eo OO ee 16% 
iieniebeat Blucvand vallied colors...: se eee ea ee 4% 
Distribution in L. Erie— Localities. . 
y Presque Isle La Plaisance 
Bay Bay 
PalemWVARACeOuss Pituk. HOC en tn agen legen ae rT OY pate ne Ms ne eae 
JESSE GSU ENS ey ere NII ae as Wels, Be SRI ak rao ME et eg OAL ar cee i OS, i UN Dh 88% 
AO oem en OUCIN nee ie ce ak tae Wha Beer 2 eed ee EYEE S 1 ee eta 
Ta jipeelay(oiy TE Care wed koa UOC WNC ey Cheha le dea SO MS SC ile Weyiiee Se A Ng 1S Nay AR RAR PR ON TELS Ng 


Deductions from Tables of Percentages and Pl. IIT. 


Pearl blue as such is more abundant in the Upper Ohio Drainage, 
but to explain this apparent discrepancy to the tendencies already 
observed, it may be pointed out that there are larger percentages 
of bluish colors in L. Erie than in the Upper Ohio, furthermore 
the more or less lilac shades of L. Erie shells show admixture with 
bluish tints. 

In the Upper Ohio Drainage: 

Pearl blues are found to greater extent in the rivers than in their 
tributaries, where the colors are pink and reddish. Fading out 
tendencies are observed in the Allegheny River and French Creek. 
At the nearest station to the Allegheny River in French Creek they 
are pinkish, while in the Allegheny itself they are grayish blue. 


224 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Characteristic stream colors appear to be, 

Pearl blue in the Loyalhanna, altho’ a few are pink. 

Pinks and blues are apparently equal in the Shenango, altho’ 
these colors are seen to merge to a light grayish blue violet, the 
pinks fading out. 

Pale flesh color in the Pymatuning with a Sea tone of deeper 
blues, (Plumbago blue). 

Pinks and blues seem equally distributed in Neshannock Creek. 

Pinkish colors in Slippery Rock Creek. 

TnL. Fone 

Lilac colors are characteristic at Presque Isle, Burn Blue at La 

Plaisance Bay. 


Observation on Sex Correlative Coloration, etc. (15 shells). 
Males possess more pearl blues, less salmon colors, and a tendency 
toward lilac colors not found in females. The latter have a pre- 
ponderance of vivid pinks. 
5.—Symphynota (Lasmigona) costata. 
Here closest attention was paid to the color of the nacre in the 
umbonal cavity, as apparently being the most variable. 


SIMPSON RIDGEWAY 
Whitish* Pearl Blue 
Straw colored Pale Pinkish Buff, Pale Ochraceous Buff. 


Sea-shell Pink, Pale Ochraceous Salmon 
Light Buff, Pale Pinkish Buff. 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Drainage and 
L. Erie. (68 shells). 


Pate Pialrsh WB rievete 6 Ue She cE 2 Se eee 27% 
Palen© chraceous) Bi is .ete so 7680 Po ys te, ee) ae a he a eee 23% 
wea: Shell Pinks ;@te selec lel be eg Ae Wie oes oa SAC ee ee Sh 16% 
Breaths Blite 88 a SO ee a ee iy Se Cae ee 16% 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Drainage and 
L,. Erie. (47 shells.) 


PalegPankish: \Btiis jetes os. le 0 oie ae ka a ene eee 36% 
Rearl sBlue; eteicc-c ade 2: 25 Sesh ke TNA ee) ees ee eS ee 23% 
Sea ‘Shell “Praler sete et EIR eae aa ok 2 eee ee ne La 17% 
Pale: ;Pinkish: Cinnamon, etch sa.) ae ee 2 oR ee See eee 10% 
Pale iGrayish 'Vinaceous:) =e ees eee ON ee eee eee 4% 
] Esl) -< OS) 1 Fab) 65,6 00 Rem Sine ee wee RE REO PEW TE ed Fie ey a Rens RP EN 2: 1 Ai EO pe ee! 10% 


*“Whitish’ practically negligible in any part of the shell. Pearl Blue is 
probably the real shade. 


> A ah whee ESS. 


VARIATION IN NACREOUS COLOR OF NAIADES 225 


sf 
Distribution of Colors in Upper Ohio Tributaries, etc. 
Allegheny Allegheny Beaver 
Tribs. River Tribs. 
Peale pinkish: Butt, ete: 2221 kate! TOO Ge See fake ek jig, ere eanee ied SSB. 28% 
Heat Biitemetex ee bel We ee DOO are EA Bh ae ee Ek 14% 
Seawolves etek eee: tee Sy ee he LOO pee Lea Le Tey pe eas eee 8% 
Pale Pink Cinnamon, etce...__............-- HS ee eee es U7 Vg ee 14% 
yamiciste Sih netCes 25 8 hs TO pan ce tee BO. a dedi. vA AMES sea Aone) 
Palenoalilon GbGs =e 110 19a Hee Ai ete SR GURNEE Fee EN Ee 21% 
Pale Ochraceous (Biff. =~. Fe TiO O/ga ge rere sk LAS, Ve Sake Seer 21% 
Wchcaceous Butt: 602 ee ee TO Ope tet a. Dh ee dee 2 ie enna 
Meemretstayisn Bite Violet. ete..5. 222) n ee SiO oe le ae een 
PaleeGravishiViilaceols; Cters oe 2. Bo a ee Bos eae eae eee 
Salheaveray Jeioniel it; SARWAN ONAM ARS UD Tie ons eas Steet ee are eee She ANS Meee nmi eee AB 
Distribution of Colors as a Whole in L. Erie. (21 shells). 
Palen Ochrqee ous politi, heLCeaee oa teeta ee Ae ee fe Sot ee ee ee 34% 
Baten Ochiacealisoalimotn et. eae ye pa ee a A ee 38% 
“LS SSDS RIT gS SAS 8 le OO EOP? ga Bia oe De OMe er cae aicsaer SORE es oS ee de 9% 
Err ilcicty “Esiatie Cte tt a ht So a a Re a ne a 
Distribution in L. Erie—Localities 
Presoue La Plaisance 
Isle Bay 
Pe wOChcACeOusW Bil, eters oe eee 1} fy Pe oe Ie 
Paley Ochraceous) Salm ony ete .2 2 he ee gig OF AAs re ieee aes 
U6 ELST STOUT Ss Aa Sean, A Ca Ae eNO a ae cee Poe LO Reems esd Ls 50% 
paleaeainersh ity, CCRC ee seas Pe en TL O75. ee ae 
ber Saline tty (OCC eae Sie mee ee ees Aine 2 Bd 5c eam apr os! 50% 
Pate Canmhamotm Pim! eteic 0 wes e bales aa NE 5k ON LE Re 
Baitralicers nus tr iter et Cs iin 3 ele. ania ae Ween 2 ey heh Ee Be sy G/M mh Bab ats iat: Fei 


Deductions from Tables of Percentages and PI. III. 


As previously noted, the greatest attention was paid in this 
species to the color of the umbonal cavity. Shell for shell, the blues 
seemed deeper in the rest of the nacre in L. Erie. altho’ more pearl 
blue as a color of the umbonal cavity is reported from the Upper 
Ohio. Buff and salmon colors preponderate in L. Erie, where in 
the Upper Ohio, the colors may be pearl blue or pinkish. . 
In the Upper Ohio Drainage: 

Shells lose their buff colors and become pink going down the 
Allegheny. This also occurs in French Creek, and seems to be the 
case also in the Monongahela River and possibly in the Shenango. 
As a general rule there seemed to be more purely pearl blue in the 


Allegheny Tribs. than in the river itself. Other characteristic 


stream colors, besides those shown on PI. IIII are, 
Ochraceous Buff in Quemahoning Cr. 


226 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Pale Pinkish Buff in French Cr. 
Pale Pinkish Buff in Mahoning River. 
Sea-shell Pink in Racoon Cr. 


In Lake Erie: 


Presque Isle apparently has a larger proportion of Salmon colors | 


than La Plaisance Bay. 


' Observation on Sex Correlative Coloration, etc. (5 shells). 


Pearl Blue preponderates in males. 
‘Females have redder colors, with a large proportion of Buff. 


6.—Anodonta grandis. 


SIMPSON RIDGEWAY. 
Bluish White Pearl Blue, Pale Grayish Blue Violet 
Tinted with Purple Vinaceous Pink, Pale Aniline Lilac. 
Cream Color Pale Pinkish Buff. 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Drainage and 
L. Erie. (119 shells ). 


erm PBL EGE. es oa, co ten OE te ees ce ee gee ea ee 40% 
Pale iowa yisn lee: Witolet. se Se a ee ee 15% 
Pale) rik rot th eo) ee a Se ee 33% 
WATTAGE IS Eiiillcee: et CS seer 0S oR pues SIN ROR eek Woes Ua ee ee 5% 
Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Drainage. (97 
shells.) 
earl Biier etc. 2 2:28 1 So A a oe eo 46% 
PalesGrayish> Blue Violet; ete. 2 ae PENH eRe SSOMAD se ENR 24% 
Mole sPrakcish: ait, etey in oe J ek eee 8% 
Winaceots ePink ete .icc. be. 25s ae) ea ae SE ele 10% 


Distribution in Upper Ohio Tributaries. 


Allegheng Beaver Monong. Tuscarawas 
. Tribs. Tribs. River River 
Pearls Blite feteis. ae eee TN SOIT EE AAA oe ae TOO % ee 100% 
Pale Grayish Blue Violet, etc........... BUA Aan aE as 19 hy Ae MPN Ue Ee 
Pale Pinkish) Buti. vete 2 teas OM Ges ae ee 25 Yo eb a oe ae 
Distribution of Colors as a Whole in L. Erie. (22 shells.) 

RearluBlite, .ete.o%: #200 se a ga eee Se ee eee 55% 
Pale Pinkish Bits ete. S00 <3 sy ee 15% 
Pale :\Grayish* Blue; Violet; etets:. eee ee ee 20% 
Palé “Aniline Palaci eter. 0 re eee ee eek ee eee 10% 


Deduction from Tables of Percentages and Pl. IIII. 


Pearl blue has a proportionally larger representation in L. Erie 
than in the Upper Ohio. L. Erie has additionally more pinkish and 


See gt ee ae ee 


» Irs, aS ee 


F 
Q 


VARIATION IN NACREOUS COLOR OF NAIADES 227 


buff colors. Lavenders and grays predominate in the Upper Ohio 
Drainage. 
In the Upper Ohio Drainage: 

In the headwaters of French Creek this shell is pearl blue, 
lower down becoming pale grayish blue violet. In the 
Shenango, it fades out from a pale pinkish cinnamon color in up- 
stream regions to pale grayish blue violet downstream. Fading out 
is also observed in the Crooked Creek Drainage. Characteristic 
stream colors are, 

Sea-shell pink in the Mahoning. Pearl blue in Slippery Rock and 
Racoon Creeks, Vinaceous pink in Sugar Creek, Pearl Blue in 
Tuscarawas River, Pale Grayish Blue Violet in the Maumee 
Drainage. 

Shells from Conneaut Lake resemble those of L. Erie to some 
extent in possessing a light pinkish lilac hue. 

In L. Ere: 
Characteristic hues as shown. 


Observation on Sex Correlative Coloration, etc. (8 shells). 


Males have a pearl blue or cream color. 
Females—pale grayish blue violet or pinkish. 


7.—Paraptera fragilis 


SIMPSON RIDGEWAY 
Faint Purplish Pale Pinkish Lilac, Pale Congo Pink 
Bluish Pearl Blue. 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Drainage and 
L. Erie. (58 shells). 


1 ECeYeTs Gh YD BY HOY Sy Mey of ceeet at AN RN CRE dB WL Re NN, ee tae eee POT eee | ba Wk 20% 
Pale Pinkish: Lilac, ete... 22.-.-2.-0201... ie Nias 2 SEE PNAC SG Feng Lye tae ES aR A 50% 
Pater Congo Pinks Gbeeee eae en ea EE he hee hele Booey 30% 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in the Upper Ohio Drainage 
(28 shells). 


SET A 8 2h OS) aU IO eo once ar NE ROR Glee da nL Ua em eRe RL ERI Bo 20% 
Pale einkiGhed lacs CL Cia mu sore ee oe ee Ve oe ae 40% 
CETL STS M MAN 85 > <i RA oy oS aT a ls RE Ble Oy Ras WR ORNs, erate ME dla Eagle 40% 
Distribution in Upper Ohio Tribs., etc. 

Allegheny Ohig 

River River 

Pearle Benne terol te teat ide Mago nate aN po te Alera maaan aL TN eta § 15% 
Pale beninkistenletlae eters eer el ec EP ea Ce ANN eke oe ae al 55% 


Pale (Cotten! Pink, ete. oe ee ee oo) AAU ATR er WAN ia Be 30% 


228 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in L. Erie (30 shells). 


Pearl Blue etn eon eee eee eee ee eta cela ba aaa adei aap LUee eee ae 33% 
Pale PinkishDalac, ete. ics sc er ass EVR ish SS ne AL 2 U 41% 
Pale’ Congo) Pink, ete..21.......02220..2.....2, CECA RENAE Nea ER Cary SA A AB Dy 20% 
Distribution in L. Erie—Localities. 
Presque La Plaisance 
Tsle ay 

ySCerhg Wal 34 Gy apt Hola eae Wea eet eae i Cee eo et ce Real sa 807g Oe eee 16% 
Pale “Pinkish :Tilac, etek ot ee ee a) SO pa eke Sean 50% 
Pale .Casivo! Pink, ete. ih oh eee asad etna Ok i pet eae Oa 33% 


Deductions from Tables of Percentages and Plate IIT. 


There is a greater percentage of pearl blue in L. Erie, and there 
are more reddish shells in the Upper Ohio Drainage. 
In the Upper Ohio Drainage: 

Less Pearl Blue and more of the reddish colors are present in the 
Allegheny River. Shades tending toward purplish predominate in 
the Ohio. Shells of this species lighten in color going down the 
Allegheny and Ohio, at least in the upper stretches of the latter. 
In Lake Erte: 

Presque Isle possesses more pearl blues and less pink than La 
Plaisance Bay. 


Observation on Sex Correlative Coloration, etc. (5 shells). 


The males appear to have lighter lilac and pinkish shades. 


8.—Proptera alata 


SIMPSON RIDGEWAY 
Coppery purple. Hydrangea Pink, Light Pinkish Lilac, Light 
Purplish Vinaceous, Light Russet Vinaceous, 
Light Purplish Lilac. 


Distribution of Color in Upper Ohio Drainage and Lake Erie as 
a Whole. (55 shells). 


Fiydranges. Pink). ete. eet ae, ie ete es el tld ec 27% 
Raght | Pinkish:) Tila, ete eye 15 Se OL Na Se a Re 34% 
laght Purplish  Vinaeceous, ete.) 0.2 oR eee ea 21% 
Taght ‘Russet. Vimaceous,) ete. i. ne Ee 16% 
Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Drainage. (24 
shells). 
Iydranigea, (Pinks ete. 2.0: ee Ta) Seas Na Seas ear ae 27% 
Richt Parplish: Vinaceaus, etc, .0:.005 0 acral 46% 
Tights Russet Vinaceots,, Cte ee yee eee Bec seen ee ee eae 24% 


Light | Pyrliqels | Dla ocooesocep men nces barman rte ease ee se vatican 3% 


SP eros 


x) ees 


LiFenteo) eee 


PLATE II.—FENTON on THE HACKBERRY STAGE. 


Gk. Fer Tep,-pen 


PLATE TIII.—FENTON on THE HACKBERRY STAGE 


bul ssawenoowuTey) serg ~-~o 


5 


Zw? ces a EH enm) 


oe ie ae | en ae 


pursg +04/0M 


peSBaol 


auevond Sei G@Ho>D 
med, = 


wazda7m ye) 


pudfAor # 

Fo Asoya'H 4 yi 
8 S 
c 


SF 
ry) 
iy a  Byo 9) 
eat 


wegvAn7 


we ctr ee fee ww a e+ Hh -—— 5 —— - — - — - — - — - > 
rs 94ue7 vaoavinvHd ! 
ao12s/2D 


! 
f£A10f SIMA: | 
| 
' 


WY OA Near Nl 


SHAVIVN JO SHIOXdS NIVLUHO JO WOOO SNOMAOWN NI NOILVIUVA NO MAINO—I FLV Td 


ee ee eer 


ee ee we ee 


GayaGISNOD S3ILTIVOO1 
ONIMOHS 


39VNIvyd OTHO daddfNn 
io dV W * 

| «\ 
aE 


gay oe 
si, (W 
cieeaapaiiived 
(y 
, a GAOGIE THT 
f pursue A4a1u 0617° ‘at aad 
tY 
{| S2vavesy Moy i 
Wag APL 4 (9) Pues mowmstam ) 6 
, el 6 
; ‘+ Se HOYUNASLIIGY Vg 
SA 9 9) 4 
6 RA jodobd OF 
eu 
2 Jd Sua ne PS Si0nry 1S) 
& A P72, 
oS Gi Yiwom eb pz7 Pus 
49 AS) nawpiaa 9, may 
sauder See t HH = 
oA » LouU0ne OY 
ne ee ( 
242 4 
7 4a; 42425 ) 4e0 bag 
puegytaey A 
wow, “at gon Vy S 2/2 grtv a 
ap/IsMe2edD ee fh s. Fe yanvad @ 
| hires By 9 28H a : 
Ey Neal 9 2 esdouss a7 2 Wo 
‘ H ae) 
2045 <= ay POSH //F7 
PL) “ung 


Ww 


‘SHAVIVN JO SHIOHdAS NIVLUAO JO WOTOO SNOMAOVN NI NOLLVISVA NO aHIaD 7 ALY Td 


Lota Of Wedowa OF & 
4 6 Gop Por re shay \ & 


» xo, __ - > — - 

a ee ae ea =, RET TN: 

) Yan be} 4e2aq> hay mn i Hegel 

“un / 

G3ay3dISNood S3JILTIVOO1 © geet ; | 
ON IMO H Ss = ots 

« 4 asa7wAvm 

39yNIVUd OIHO ¥3AddN \ a ay ee | 
3 y | 
S| O Jd V W “<\ ay HOS ja 2] D° PL a | 

Ayre | 

ze 2 uite oe ) 

GLOGETHZ | 
3 | 
Oe BES a ene Ny wbau40> | 
HOuUNAaSsiiIdl \ g | 
{ 
aN | 
poston, “he mon S 


Suort¢e-oOy 
o) 


4a0 02g 


Cue? ett 
= 5 WY, Uysnvad O\ 
ap/S 423472 Sa eer - 
“ ejdous/ a7) Ds US 
& 
fp Beeny/F 
42 


(77 2p 
+ ia wae f Euicorag 
D2 
US 2: yurd %224 74h? 2ERIAQ 


SG 
<a, we” 


O 


S//MlaLdSa ogy 
' 
‘ ° 

O Ol (OSHAO/D = { 

34 27 Bp oS 


064 buaysd 


1 
= 


Umoayzysowor 


0 Gem Of Sp OF 7, pond 
3) Awa 044205 4 yd? 


H 


A2 yey 
uot 


cS ayia saur7 


| 

, ayia uUPo4Q) 
pureg +04/0M Pr) | 
t 
i 
wpsodoll | 
| 


| 
eyod 

2 puvfAos 
AsowoH 


4S, 
me 


a) 
ne vauy > 


—— a eel 
- - 


gy4v7 vaonVL1nvHo 
wore/2@D 


3 N 


' 

! 

fal SQLs aey: | 
| 

' 


\ ‘ 


let 


VARIATION IN NACREOUS COLOR OF NAIADES 229 


Distributior in Upper Ohio Tributaries. 


Alle’ny Riv’ Monong. Riv. Ohio Riv. 

Light Purplish Vinaceous, etc.-......... GOO pee NN GOL Ne. 2h eee Ses 33% 

Light Russet Vinaceous, etc..__........-. BOW pom cay Nas IR AO ge a ae ec 33% 

Perivorances), Pink, eter... st. BOIS se is aN eA as BO 33% 
Distribution of Colors as a Whole in L. Erie (31 shells). 

Ne teie ea te cae rad eae we ee oe Se) 2 ee ee 25% 

Leer DEY a poy ISTE Os UE oh A) eae ae ae nC i Meme oe Memes CHEESE 3 50% 

VAG HMI A COOLMS ECG a2 8a22 08 celeste cM eh SS A he Us gh ieee 25% 

Distribution in L. Erie—Localities. 
La Plaisance Cedar Presque 
Bay Point Isle 

iyvdranves ePinks: ete.) 30 oh ae (7 (iene aha ieee ta 8 TOG eae 12% 

Light Purplish Vinaceous, etc......._.. ig Oars eae beg fos ToT foi eae, terrains 44% 

isiipebweplist lilacs (@terets. et ae hl Ae ee Do Ioihs o/h Ree 44% 


Deductions from Tables of Percentages and Pl. III. 

Lake Erie shells appear to be of a more uniform lilac hue, while 
there is a greater proportion of pinks and purples in the Upper Ohio 
Drainage. 

In the Upper Ohio Drainage: 

The nacreous color seems to be lighter in the Ohio than either 
the Allegheny or the Monongahela. Coppery purple, (Light Russet 
Vinaceous), is most prominent in the Monongahela. “A tendency 
to lighten going down stream is seen in the Allegheny. 

In Lake Erie: . 

La Plaisance Bay stands out for a greater proportion of pinks, 

Cedar Point for Lilac purple, and Presque Isle for dark purple colors. 


Observation on Sex Correlative Coloration, etc. (6 shells). 
Males—pinkish or lilac. 
Females—purple or russet. 
9.—Anodontoides ferrussacianus. 


Here the general tone of the nacre color—not merely the irides- 
scence—was considered. 


SIMPSON RIDGEWAY 
Bluish-white Lavender, Grayish Blue Violet, Pale Grayish 
Blue Violet 
Bluish Pearl Blue, Pale Aniline Lilac. 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in the Upper Ohio Drainage 
and Lake Erie. (69 shells). 
iced ce Reimar Pyne? pestle lee ah NS Soe Ne EN ee Ua ee ee al 26% 


230 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Pearl ‘Blue, sete yc. Ce ee ae ee Ae te ones Ow i 25% 
Mavender: ete ea ee Pe ol ee 23% 
Grayish Blue. Violet, :etc.2.2:5 SN se) ee ee ee 22% 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in the Upper Ohio Drainage. 
(45 shells). i 


Pearl *Blue,ete,-ve. 224 2 eho Pe Ee za ne 23% 
Pate Astiline \‘Drlac, ete: 2508) ae ee ee ee ee 20% 
Wa Venger, Gti a ge ee ae oes Eee at ai Le 22% 
Easht) Grayish ‘Blue. Violet, ete... oss) oo Se eee 28% 
Distribution of Colors in the Upper Ohio Tribs., etc. 
Allegheny Beaver 
Tribs. Tribs. 
earhvpliwve,* Cte n tf 2 aa at eee La TA Woot ee ee 20% 
Pple, anime: Talae: Ste.) ee ee ee co fe A A 15% 
Wavender:: Cte 2c. 036 oe) eA AE mn le 25% 
RisheGrayish bine) Violet; ete, foe ea ee 26% 3 oe 40% — 
Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Lake Erie. (24 shells) 
Pale FAniline (Tilac, sete os hel 6 et SOO Sa 9 Be 31% 
Peattepine, Cbel co oe ee es ee ee 25% 
PalesGrayish blue. Violet, sete 2 Si ee ee 19% 
Wavender Ctecs. ho eae Ne SO Deed AIR ae iie fy BL ere a 25% 
Distribution in L. Erie—Localities. 
Presque Maumee Conneaut 
River River Creek 
Pale Aniline Lilac, etc...........2.......-.. a Or ak Wr bana ae BOS a a eae 28% 
Pate Vine Btess wi Pee eek ee a Be OF y wae se 2h Of a) hee 14% 
Pale Grayish Blue Violet, etc........... ec Ae Aan AE BIS Er Ae se Wh tee 43% 
Wavender vere soy Moke Aoi Yah ee TOs sie Ns 25 Ge a ee 14% 


Deductions from Tables of Percentages and Pl. ITI. 


There are more pearl blue, lilac and their related colors in L 
Erie than in the Upper Ohio Drainage, but there are less of a 
lavender hue. 

In the Upper Ohio Drainage: 

Lilac colors appear to predominate in the Allegheny Tributaries 
as against lavender in the Beaver Tribs. Conneaut Creek draining 
into L. Erie possesses more pearl blue shells than either the Beaver, 
Shenango, or Allegheny Rivers. Descending French Creek, the 
nacre of the species appears to lighten. Pale grayish Blue Violet is 
characteristic of the French Creek, while Pearl Blue is more typical 
of the Shenango. 

In Lake Ente: 

Presque Isle stands out for lilac colors; the Maumee River 

which drains into it, possesses a great deal of lavender. 


[ 
i. 
z 
; 


VARIATION IN NACREOUS COLOR OF NAIADES 231 
J 
Observation on Sex Correlative Coloration, etc. (3 shells). 
Males tend toward lavender colors, females blue. In this species, 
as well as a few others dealt with, the numbers used hardly 
justify any definite conclusion as to the association of nacreous 


color with the sex of the animal. \ 
10.—Eurynia recta. 
SIMPSON RIDGEWAY 
Purple Light Pinkish Lilac, Light Purplish Vinaceous, 
Pale Congo Pink. 
Bluish White Pearl Blue 
Whitish White 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in the Upper Ohio Drainage 
and Lake Erie. (54 shells). 


Rear Blue ete... AF ANS EOE MRe Wn ek A Sr eee eh ul HOP Lh SIM gEnE A ae Anna sere ATL 33% 
Vii Aint En KEYES. eh Seek, SEM AR AE Ce A ees Sa IML Sk KARMA Oe AE esr obs 47,6 21% 
Peta lersitt (aes eters vn kit oat es APS Sl eee pala oe Le Revere 30% 
igi bil plish Vitis COMSs) EtCe ca i kao ee EN Os Se ee A 15% 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in the Upper Ohio Drainage 
(33 shells). 


jee JB GUWE) were) een ReneS GES RASA aO Nyhan aN) me SN bees. eg 2 ar an i edd Be COR Tbr 32% 
ON AICCVD HES CLS SAE eC Rg RW Sa eg ROMERO Se eof. 24% 
ei ouaeme era kas) e PilaG yc @t ee. 2 ee ay he A 1a SERN ee ae 23% 
Tee ME plish eVihia CEOS GlC 28 els LOE ga 2 a eee 21% 
Distribution of Colors in Upper Ohio Tributaries, etc. 
‘ Alleghney Alleghney Ohio Tuscarawas 
Trubs. River River River 
]P1 aia | ABW WS eR Nes OAL ar SA ae UR Oct BAL ene one ia he 36 gee ee 60% 
Vii Ss EMOTE OI SS Pe ON 2 ce PS Ela RP GOA i) ees DAI OTS ey wee BOG x ans oes 
iicht pPimkish’ Lilac. ete. Betas ZOO fae TOOG Reet ae 20% 
Light Purplish Vinaceous, ete.-..... SEE ey phe ee By wse cee) pW UE nO 20% 
Distribution of Colors as a Whole in’Lake Erie. (21 shells). 
AFUE Met ESCO Ih eee ae WA ad its OARS NE 20 ge ORR od ae. SE Pe ae 39% 
Hetoniiem erika Shee a Geter wees eu iat able ts Ree hives tei lade OA es 30% 
ain list VitttatCeous KEtC ior. ie fee ie fo late JE GRE a abe lara 21% 
Palem@onmonmiik, tet, nore et hi eile Wa aes ae Coe ese fe We 12% 


Distribution in Lake Erie—Localities. 


Cedar Point Pesque Isle 
Bea ringpliteyet@es 6 See eee bl Ak 5 AI aC yn ee ee OY 5-6 Nies Sue a 36% 
J EIGN 2,112 8) Bg IB eet ga 2 5 Ser ea St oa RR Rs Oe ATA i Nola iinet 34% 
Right buspishe Vinaceous, yete.i ki ye ee, iy y/o eee 20% 
Palew@ oie, me tikes rece: te thewe ie! oikes Yor oh UE Ek nl Sy ole atk ae Bele 10% 


Deductions from Tables of Percentages and PI. III. 
A greater amount of Pearl blue and light purple exists in Lake 


232 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Erie. White, in any abundance, is found most in the Upper Ohio 
Drainage. 


In the Upper Ohio Drainage: 

Pinkish colors predominate in the Allegheny Tributaries, white 
pearl blue in the river. The Ohio and Tuscarawas Rivers show the 
greatest percentage of Pearl Blue. A fading out is seen descending 
the Allegheny. Characteristic stream colors are, 

Light Pinkish Lilac in the Seana White in the Ohio. 


In Lake Ere: 

Where Cedar Point possesses more pearl blue, Presque Isle has 
more pinkish and purplish colors. 

In Chautauqua Lake the prevailing color is a vinaceous pink. 


Observation on Sex Correlative Coloration, etc. (33 shells). 


The nacre of the males seems to be prevailingly purplish; that 
of the females, pinkish. Pearl Blue is about evenly represented 
in both sexes. 


11.—Lampsilis luteola 


SIMPSON RIDGEWAY. 
Blue Pearl Blue 
Bluish White Pale Grayish Blue Violet, White 
Straw Colored, Pink Light Pinkish Lilac, Palé Rhodonite Pink. 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in the Peet Lhio Drainage and 
Lake Erie (289 shells). 


Tage. «Pitikishs Lilacs e662) 2.2: 2 ihe eh oe th Co el eee ee 35% 
PRarl WB lite Meteo. os. ee eee Se ae Se Nn a ce 13% 
Wihtitel weet co o.2 ee teers he Ae Se an | ne sa Se a 17% 
PalevGrayish #Bliue? Violet, ete. 32. 2s ee eee 35% 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Lhio Drainage 
(187 shells). 


Wight einrkish Wtlae siete: eae eee oP Ae eee ee 30% 
NWiltite; Het: 28 eh R hs 8 See 1) RS eS Se ee eee 14% 
Bearl Blie: sete: 822 a el ees Ue ae ENS hues ely ee eee ee 24% 
Pate .Grayish?:Blae Violet; sete 2.25) Ao ON See area ee 35% 


Distributixn in Upper Lhio Tribs., etc. 


Alle’ny Alle’ny Monong. Monong Ohio Beaver 


Tribs. River Tribs. River River Drainage 
Light’ Pinkish: Lilac,’ ete 22. 43 %.--:--40 %.--:--50 %p.2... 60%... 50%, ee 
Pale-Grayish Blue Wiolet; etc: 14.952 3309p SOU pe 31% 
PeanlBliie:tete.: ee ee LO pens GO ge ee ee ee ane Se 135 


VARIATION IN NACREOUS COLOR OF NAIADES 233 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Lake Erie (111 shells). 


ureRIMPEyITGs oh CLG emer ne eet oe ON Po OE ee et oe es a 41% 
AUNTS aD wy (EG ae Se a A ay ne ee cece ee NS aU en, Men cet Re 20% 
ibid ey VB Tia ke av Let bere. 12) CA ene NU pe ee eee Ae a gegen a RE Bie 
Pale hOGoniterrr tik wecGs. 2) -inegs oe ls Se ee Hs ae Is ae 12% 
Distribution in Lake Erie—Localities. 

La Plaisance Cedar Presque Maumee 

Bay Point Isle Drainage 

endanbiltie: wetete ooo seed ee TOM eee ZO ean ee: Pe Hagia east 8 20% 
WARIS), EA Cae SIR CAE ieee ame mane ei on enleae Bae 2 OU nen etree 16% 
eicthee eitikasitel tac eu. 6 ele ee BO peters DiC ee eee 215 G7 ten B30 
Pale Rhodonite Pink, etce_............... FY eee Nees Hes Fa 7 Ne SS BDU) eaten ee 31% 


Deductions from Tables of Percentages and Pl. ITI. 


Pearl Blue’as well as white is more abundant in L. Erie, but the 
Upper Ohio has more shades of Light Pinkish Lilac. Pink, however, 
is a color comprised to large extent in Lake Erie shells, while pale 
grayish blue violet is largely represented in the Ohio. 


In the Upper Oluo Drainage: 

Pinkish colors predominate in the Allegheny Tribs., but blues in 
the rivers. 

There is less pink in the Ohio than in the Monongahela, while 
white is not present in the tributaries of the latter. Pale Grayish 
Blue Violet seems characteristic of the Beaver Tribs. as a whole, 
while there is less pearl blue in the Ohio than in the Allegheny, but 
more white. A fading out is seen going down stream in the Alleg- 
heny, Monongahela, and Shenango Rivers as well as in the French 
Creek. Characteristic stream colors are; 

Light Pinkish Lilac to Pearl Blue in the Allegheny, Pale Grayish 
Blue Violet in French Creek, white with a Light Pinkish Lilac tinge 
in Conewango Creek. 


In Lake Erte: 


Light Pinkish Lilac predominates at La Plaisance- Bay, while a 
Lighter Pink represents Cedar Point. Presque Isle is apparently 
between the two with regard to color, in this respect resembling 
the Maumee Drainage. In this as well as in other species, character- 
istic colors not mentioned for any given locality are obtained from 
Plo TUT: 

Pale Persian Lilac is a typical color for shells from Conneaut 
Lake, while a more pinkish variety of this—pale pinkish lilac—is 


\ 
234 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


characteristic of Chautauqua Lake.* Greater uniformity of nacre 
color was found in this than in any other species, a fact somewhat 
associating itself with the ubiquitous distribution of the species. 


Observation on Sex Correlative Coloration, etc. (94 shells). 


Males—Pinkish lilac, and apparently a greater proportion of 
white. | 
Females—Pale grayish blue violet—slightly more pearl blue. 


12.—Lampsilis ovata 


SIMPSON RIDGEWAY 
Silvery White 
Bluish white Pearl blue, Pale Grayish Blue Violet 
Pink Light Pinkish Lilac, Pale Purplish Vinaceous. 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in the Upper Ohio Drainage 
and Lake Erie. (214 shells). se 


Pearle Bite, VOC. ie: sence ses yea RN 2s an TO Sasa es A eb ea 20% 
\1 {71 Br otha <8 8 Cea Aa AURORE Peet seins eon rrr aay /ee hs coupe 2. RUPE TE SS 20% 
iene Pinkish Walae) ‘ete Noe he ee ee ee 30% 


Pale.Grayish (Blue “Violet; “eb 2 he ee ee oe 11% 
Pale wPurplish Vinaceous; ete. 0 ees heh Nee ee ee ee cad 19% 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Drainage. 
(188 shells). 


Berl Mle et ee str omel a oF ached Gh OS SR ee ee 19% P. 
iicht iPimkash > Dalac; ete i: 2s) ol ee eS eee ee 25% % 
NWahitte sete: |t3 56 oS oN eS ae ee eae Se ee ee eee 19% | 
Pale Grayish Blue Violet, etc.-_-..................- Pere ia oat SEE 3 eS 19% & 
PalevPurplish “Vinaceous’, ete... See Se ee 18% ; 
Distribution in Upper Ohio Tribs., etc. 
Alle'ny  Alle'ny Ohio Ohio Beaver Beaver j 
Tribs. River River Tribs. River Tribs. t 
Pearl Blves) etens sess See ee. 20% 22.22%... 1AM 2 10% 35 Vg eee \ 
Tight Pinkish Lilac, etc..---...- 25 Of soe be BAN, oan Se ee 4%.-----40% £ 
VGC et ce Lt) eke wee Sec reat A 20 %i....22 Goce. 25 Jp. 13 Yo 10 pe etOee ; q 
Pale Grayish Blue Violet, etc.....17 %....-- D5 Vo 12%... 259. 0 On eg x 
Purplish Vinaceous, etc........... 19:% 2217 25 Yoel oe 7% % 
Distribution of Colors as a Whole in L. Erie, (26 shells). ‘ 
Peatl Blues ete: 3.2.2.2 e te eR ee eee 24% § 
Licht Pinkish ‘ilact eter -<: 5 > see ee ee oe 23% 
WWihite; Sete 8 ee a ag A Roe ee Se 22% 
a tas ko ae a 
* My observations on all lake specimens of this species correspond with 
those of Baker concerning it in Oneida Lake, N. Y. Baker, F. C., The ‘ 
Relation of Mollusks to Fish in Oneida Lake, Tech. Pub. No. 4. N. Y, 
State College of Forestry, Syracuse, 1916. p. 41. 


VARIATION IN NACREOUS COLOR OF NAIADES 235 
em ray ish HE Iter NHOLEL wo Cte 2 tts Ger he ee Tia 
Rem unpliGhiey tla ceousuneten see 5) Say ten te een woes ee 17% 

Distribution in Lake Erie—Localities, and Chautauqua Lake. 
La Plaisance Cedar Presque Chautaugua 

ay Point Isle Lake 
eat wee, etee) tig. ea PN Sabato Behe ey of A AO SU 40% 
ieee Prakash) Wilac, jetet 2). D5 as a Aare Soe i AO relates 35% 
iPaleyPimkish, Vinaceous, ete 2/1137 %..-.... Se ae eats Tigi oe tees 25% 
Pale Grayish Blue Violet, ete... OO dr es Te Ay ee Be od a 710 )y /paenten ble 94 he 


Deductions from Tables of Percentages and Pl. III. 


Pearl Blue and White are most abundant in L. Erie and there is 
less Pinkish Lilac or Purplish colors, as well as more Pale Grayish 
Blue Violet are most peculiar to the Upper Ohio drainage. 

In the Upper Ohio Drainage: , 

The rivers have more Pearl Blue and White than the tribs. but 
less Light Pinkish Lilac and less Pale Grayish Blue Violet. General 
shades of Pinks and Pearl Blues are about evenly distributed 
throughout this drainage. About the same percentage of blues 
exists in the Allegheny and Beaver Drainages, while White is most 
abundant in the Ohio,—apparently an outstanding exception to the 
general rule. Fading is seen going down stream in the Allegheny, 
Ohio, Shenango, and Little Beaver Rivers. Characteristic stream 
colors are best indicated in Pl. III. 

In Lake Ene: 

Here white and pearl blues are practically equivalent. Most of 
the Light Pinkish Lilac colors are at Presque Isle Bay; Pale Purplish 
Vinaceous in La Plaisance Bay; while Cedar Point has more . 
purplish colors than Presque Isle, it has less than La Plaisance Bay. 

Pearl Blue predominates in Chatauqua Lake. 


Observation on Sex. Correlative Coloration, etc. (84 shells). 


Males may either be white, pinkish lilac or pearl blue. 
Females are purplish vinaceous. 


VI.—ConcLUSIONS. 


1. In certain species, (as may be inferred from the table dealing 
with the distribution of colors-as a whole), there exists a wider 
range of variation of nacreous color than is indicated by standard 
specific descriptions. 

2. In practically all the species dealt with, a change in nacreous 


color is observed going down stream from the headwaters to the 


236 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


mouth. The usual tendency is for the nacreous color to considerably 
lighten or become bluish. 

3. The shells of L. Erie have a greater proportion of blues among 
them than the corresponding shells in the Upper Ohio Drainage. 
and Maumee Drainages. The shells of Conneaut and Chautauqua 
Lakes have the same relation. 

Other conclusions, not however as completely substantiated as 
those given above, but still so evident from the present data as to 
deserve mention are: 

1 Each drainage leaves its own imprint on the shells collected 
from it in the form at least of an associated peculiar tone of nacre 
color. (This has already been observed with regard to other physical 
characters). While the same ‘‘relative colors’? may be present in 
different drainages, these are usually distinguished when necessary 
by varying proportions of other colors. 

2. Asarule, the color distinction may be carried so far as to say 
tentatively at least, that certain shades of nacre color are charac- 
teristic of certain localities in a given body of water. While as ob- 
served in the chart, this is best observed in the case of Presque Isle 
shells, ample verification is obtainable in shells from the Upper 
Ohio Drainage. 

3. So far as we may consider results obtained from a small 
number of shells in many cases, sex correlative coloration seems to 
be associated with nacre color. 


VIII.—SUGGESTIONS AS TO CAUSES OF FAcTs. 


Introductory remarks embody the writers’ comments on the first 
of these conclusions. Any plausible explanation of the second would 
seem to be found in the physical and chemical conditions under 
which the shells live. A summary of the physical and chemical 
conditions present in the Upper Ohio Drainage and ‘L. Erie has 
been given. Perhaps that physical condition most applying to the 
problem of nacreous color is the warmer temperature of the water 
in the former, for it has been seen that as a rule, Upper Ohio shells 
possess more pigment than those of L. Erie. Pigment is the result 
of chemical reaction, and chemical reactions in general are increased 
by the amount of heat. 

Wilson and Clark, (18,.19) were inclined to associate with the 
fading out of the nacreous color of Ellipio an abundance of lime, 
and, (conversely), the want of humic acid in the lower stretches of 


VARIATION IN NACREOUS COLOR OF NAIADES 247 
the stream.’’ Humic acid’ seems to be an indefinite chemical term 
applied to several acid compounds having their origin in the decay 
of vegetable matter. It is commonly supposed to impart its straw 
colored to deeper hues to the streams in which it is found. Such a 
stream is the Shenango R. fed by Pymatuning Creek which in 
turn drains a swamp. For the reason that forests with their residual 
humus are, under present conditions at least, most abundant near 
the headwaters of streams, it may be reasonably supposed that 
Humic Acid, if any, is most abundant there. As an acid, it must 
tend to be neutralized later in those streams having an abundance 
of lime, (CaCO3), and consequently disappear, for analyses of the 
water in various parts of the Upper Drainage where the shells were 
collected (6,10), show that there is an increase in the amount of 
lime present and alkalinity in general going down stream, with a 
converse reduction, it may be assumed, of any acidity. Faussek, (2), 
in studies with marine pelecypods came to the conclusion that water 
containing acid promoted the formation of pigment, while he 
believed that light played no part in this process. List, (11), 
another observer was inclined to credit the importance of light as a 
factor in pigment formation. As the headwaters are freer from silt 
than those of the lower stretches, we have according to tiese in- 
vestigators, more ideal conditions for the production of pigment 
there than further down stream, where as a matter of fact it is less 
abundant. In this behaviour of nacreous color of Najades in up- 
stream regions we have a rough analogue to that of the reaction 
of litmus to acids snd alkalies. Further, the water of L. Erie differs 
from that of the Upper Ohio Drainage and its lower regions in 
possessing a greater amount of lime and general alkalinity, especially 
to note aiter any humic acid entering the lake has been neutralized. 
lL. Erie waters also contain certain chemicals such as magnesium 
sulfate and chloride, which are not found, at least in similar quantity, 
in the Upper Ohio Drainage. Now L. Erie shells have been found to 
have greater percentages of Blue. This corresponds with the re- 
action of litmus toward alkaline solutions. 

A second analogous example and one more closely related to the 
factors concerned in the case is the behavior of iron compounds 
toward CO2 (13). It is known that Humic Acid attacks the iron 
oxides, (Fe203) which color soil red or yellow, and reduces these 
compounds to ferrous oxide. Ferrous oxide then unites with the 
CO2 omnipresent in soil water, forming ferrous carbonate, a colorless 


238 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


compound. As the result of these interactions the ground beneath 
humus deposits is usually found bleached. Clays, originally red 
or yellow, may become black, green or blue from the organic matter 
contained and from the effects of this process. When clay is burned, 
the organic matter and ferrous carbonate contained is oxidized, 
and red brick is formed for whose red color the iron oxide is re- 
sponsible. Now analyses of the shells of 4 common species of 
Najades furnished through the courtesy of the Commissioner of 
Fisheries, Washington, D. C., show that the differences in composi- 
tion between them is greatest and most marked in the content of 
otganic matter, iron, alumina and phosphoric acid. The first three 
of these are important constituents of soil, and are known to be 
responsible for the colors of many minerals. The greater rapidity 
of current, rapids, etc., of the headwaters of streams makes for their 
greater oxygenation, and this available oxygen may so react with 
these minerals of the shell as to produce the deeper colors character- 
istic of the headwaters in a fashion corresponding to the processes 
described. Further down stream, silt and slow moving waters as 
well as other conditions may tend to inhibit the oxidative process, 
and, similarly there may follow a greater inclusion of organic matter 
in the shell, possibly from the silt itself, resulting in other than the 
red or yellowish colors allied to iron oxide. A relatively similar 
situation is found in L. Erie, which has less silt but lighter colored 
shells. The lighter colors of L. Erie shells may be closest related to 
the degree of alkalinity of the water. -As the natural conditions 
of the Upper Ohio Drainage are also largely similar to those of the 
streams draining into L. Erie, a similar explanation may be assumed 
for their colors. Another alternative hardly consistent with the 
above facts is that the concentration of humic acid toward the 
mouth of the stream becomes sufficient to bleach or lighten the 
colors whose basis is iron. The improbability of this latter becomes 
clearer when it be remembered that lime also increases in amount 
going down stream. A more reasonable explanation is that CO2 
whether of the soil water or released from combination by the 
interaction of humic acid and lime, attacks the ferric or ferrous 
oxide, already present in the shells and produces ferrous carbonate, 
which colorless compound may be responsible for the lightening 
of hues observed. Such an explanation at least embraces most of 
the physical and chemical conditions known, and is certainly applic- 
able to the many curious facts concerning the nacreous color known 


VARIATION IN NACREOUS COLOR OF NAIADES 239 


to experienced collectors. With regard to the part iron plays in the 
coloration of the shells of these animals, it is suggestively recalled 
that it is the basis of many animal and plant pigments such as 
haemoglobin, bilirubin, chlorophyll, etc. 

Speculations here may be unbridled as in other fields and the 
only thing to qualify it is experimental proof. It may be noted 
that in many organisms strong production of pigment has been 
considered evidence of progressive metabolism and sometimes 
associated with ‘“‘femaleness’’ in particular. In other organisms 
beside the Mollusca it has been also associated with amount of 
oxygen present, and under the physical conditions the waters of 
the Upper Ohio are as a whole better oxygenated than those of 
L. Erie. Some of the observations bear out in part observations on 
another group of the Mollusca, the Chitons, where Crozier, (1) 
has found a more brilliant coloring of the soft parts associated with 
the ‘“‘female’’ condition, believing it merely to be the result of a 
“metabolic accident.” From the evidence given, there may be 
reason to state that the nacreous “ground color”’ of shells, from 
which all colors are produced by modification, is a Pearl Blue 
or ‘‘whitish” hue. Dr. A. E. Ortman in an unpublished paper which 
confirms observations of several other investigators, has shown 
that the shells in the headwaters of streams are usually smaller 
and more compressed than the same species in the lower stretches, 
where they have become more highly inflated. Some factor in the 
environment may thus inhibit the full physical development of the 
shell in the headwaters, but its racial metabolism, evident in 
greater development down stream, may find an outlet in the 
production of pigment, a variation hardly as harmful to it as 
increase in size and inflation would be in the swift streams of the 
headwaters. Against the above we have the check of Koifoids 
observation, (9), that the plankton elements on which these 
creatures feed increase with the temperature, and are more abun- 
dant in the lower stretches of the stream where there is more silt, 
and where the shells are more highly inflated. Finally it must be 
remembered that in so far as outside conditions are concerned, the 
nacre throughout life is protected by the greater thickness of the 
shell. 

In the preceding, endeavor has been made to consider the more 
plausible factors responsible for variation in nacreous color among 
the Najades. If a theory of “progressive metabilism” in organisms 


240 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


be held accountable in any way for variation in the nacreous 
color of Najades, a factor of possible connection is that of the age 
of the mussels. In obtaining any light upon the relation of the 
nacreous color and the age of the animal, a difficulty which presents 
itself is the accurate determination of the latter. Isely* who has 
probably made the most extensive study of the growth of Fresh 
Water Mussels, states that ordinarily the prominent rings of 
the shell are presumably winter rings, (delayed growth), and 
therefore each may represent a year of the animals life. However, 
rings may develop as the result of unfavorable conditions such as 
water shrinkage, temporary stranding, etc., and at any time of 
the year. Moreover, the rate of growth is variable for individuals 
of a single species in the same stream apparently depending on 
conditions of food, oxygen etc. . . . Growth may also slow down 
after sexual maturity. All these unfavorable conditions probably 
act to some degree on shells in the Upper Ohio Drainage. However 
at the time the color data was recorded, the writer estimated the 
age of these and those from L. Erie by counting the rings of greatest 
prominence, which Isely indicates are presumably the winter rest 
rings. Here it may be remarked as,already shown elsewhere,(3), 
that the shells of L. Erie are under more stable conditions, and 
greater confidence may be placed in such a method of estimating 
the age of them. This latter fact was the basis of a check in the 
following procedure. 

There was only the task of rearranging the different recorded 
colors by classes of the estimated age, and tais being done to see 
whether association was evident between the recorded aues and the 
estimated age. As insufficient space prevents reproduction of the 
tabulations thus secured, it can only be stated that all of the colors 
of all species were found to be distributed through all ages rather 
than being peculiar of certain ones. Certain generalizations are 
worthy of note,{ that as a rule deeper colors in all species fade 


*Isely, F. B. ‘‘Experimental Study of Growth and Migration of Fresh 
Water Mussels” Bureau of Fisheries Document, 792 (1914) 


} Thus with age, (using terminology of Simpson); in Fusconaia, the 
percentage of whites and salmons increase, rose tints decrease; Amblema, 
the bluish colors tend toward lilac shades; salmon, straw, and white increase 
in Elliptio, purples become lighter as also in Propiera and Paraptera; the 
reds fade out in Pleurobema and the salmons and buff in Symphnota, when 
the pinkish hues become more prominent, Bluish white increases in Anodonta 


| 
: 


—_—e 


VARIATION IN NACREOUS COLOR OF NAIADES 241 


with age, most of them tending to revert back to the “pearl blue 
or whitish’’ ground color. Similar treatment of L. Erie shells apart 
from those of the Upper Ohio corroborate this finding. But to be 
considered with such a generalization, is the fact that very fre- 
quently large nos. of shells of different ages from the same locality 
show an almost uniform nacre color. 


IX. RELATIVE VARIATION IN NACREOUS COLOR IN THE SPECIES 
DEALT WITH. 

The shells were so unevenly distributed with regard to localities, 
that it was impossible to determine those places where the greatest 
amount of nacreous color took place. Some idea may be obtained 
from Pl. III. In an effort to make a balanced determination of the 
relative variability of nacreous color among them a-rough and 
arbitrary comparison was taken by dividing the number of “relative 
colors’ observed in each shell by the number of that species ex- 
amined. Rough as the writer feels his methods to have been in 
exploring this uncharted field, it seems that within the limits of 
this investigation that the larger number of shells is apparently 
associated with less variation in nacre color. At the same time, 
these results are hardly fair for those species represented by a 
small number of specimens. Results from this method show the 
relative variability of the shells to be as indicated in the following 
table. 


No. of Relative INGOT Mons Factor 

Colors Taken Shells Colculated 
i Puaee Voptdt | PEGE. hs fol tks oe Nh Pa) Chek ee eee Oe 542 Aes “aa 
By LEAD UA AOS TPNGN 7 epee be Deel eae MEL ie DO Mei we ge LIN 5 de as aoe 47 
rr mplera wy TaGtis i Nt be ata Bik ai een, Eek 5 ge See .40 
PME OOLUG ULI | GOGCLI a Vettes ls. he ay Gig aun te ee 2) ite eel gel Sv ob 1 .20 
emblem. plecatae ce) Vir ae i CUA ey ea ToS 5 Syke Ne eee arts 
6. Anodont ferrussactanus.........-..-..-------..-- See el CPN AS Ae a a7 
Pi ARON OIIE OFORdiss kl Soe iy ROU fe. alae 1D (0 ge ME NSO ts .16 
ui UsE One fiage ce MAE! ol 7 Tc ike We ave Yee ae 279 eiu Meee 14 
ORME P SILLS (OUCTU Nee Se 8s FEN 8 Meise WEE BAS ce Cl eee. 14 
TOM ENLU DEO OU GEOLU She AM ed Lia a ay GA See ela ne SOL: Leo rg 
TSN NUPNMITOL@ COSTAL. ee os ee 10 dee eer even Mee ke 68.) ae Nese a qe 
me Lampstts tuteola. eee 2010s) Anrage BBG ict anes .09 


A similar study of variation in Epidermal Color in the animals is expected 
to appear in a later number of this publication. 


and Anodontoides, while the purples tend to disappear. Eurynia, L. luteola, 
and L. ovaia appear to retain their vivid colors to later age than the rest 
of the species, but all of the latter tend to revert to ‘‘ bluish-white.”’ 


242 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


SOURCES OF ERROR. 


The Ridgeway Nomenclature was used carefully following 
directions given in it. It may well be urged that the sense of color 
is so varied in its development among huminity that results of 
this kind may not have the same significance for a great number of 
those interested in these problems. But the same criticism could 
be applied to the ornithologist who uses the Nomenclature. The 
writers confidence in his own observations is largely based on the 
fact that U.S. Acmy ‘ests have shown his sense of sight to be normal 
in every respect. 

It is also true that at times the mussels mipeate from place to 
place in the same stream and from the river into the tributary. 
_ Where a small number of shells were used in making a comparison, 
this might have some effect on the results obtained, but as the 
evidence of most observers is that migration is comparatively 
rare among them, this can have hardly any effect on the general 
impressions this paper has hoped to convey. 

Washington and Jefferson College, 

Washington, Pa. 
X.—LITERATURE CITED. 

1. Crozier, W. J. ‘‘Sex Correlative Coloration in Chiton tuberculatus.” 
Amer. Nat., Vol. LIV, 1920, p. 84. 

2. Faussek, V. ‘‘Uber die Anlagung des Pigments bei Mytzlus.”’ Zeit. f. 
wiss. Zool. Vol. 65, 1898. 

3. Grier, N. M. ‘‘On the Erosion and Thickness of Fresh Water Mussels.” 
Naut. 1920. 

4. Grier, N. M. ‘‘Sexual Dimorphism and Some of its Correlations in the 
Shells of Certain Species of Najades.’’ Amer. Mid. Nat., 1920, Vol. 6, p. 165. 

5. Grier, N. M. ‘‘ Morphological Features of Certain Mussel Shells of L. 
Erie compared with Corresponding Ones of the Upper Ohio Drainage. 
Annals of Carnegie Museum, 1920. 

6. Horton, A. H., Hall, M. R., Bolster, R. H., Leighton, M. D. “Surface 
Water Supply of the United States, 1907-08. Part III, Ohio River Basin, p. 


207) 355.47 

7. Israel, W. von. ‘‘Die Najaden des Weidegebietes, etc.’ Beilage zum 
Nachrichblatt Deutschen Malakozoologisches Gesellschaft, N. 4, 1914, p. 4. 

8. Jennings, O. E. ‘“‘A Botanical Survey of Presque Isle, Erie Co., Pa. 
‘“‘Annals Carnegie Museum, Vol. 5, 1909. 

9. Kofoid, C. S. ‘‘The Plankton of the Illinois River, 1894-99. Bull. III. 
State Lab. Nat. Hist. Vol. VI, no. 1, 1903. Ibid. Vol. VIII, 1908. 

10. Lewis, S. J. ‘‘Quality of Water in Upper Ohio Basin and at Erie, Pa.” 
Water Supply Paper 161, U.S. G. Survey. 

11. List, Th. ‘‘Uber die Einfluss des Lichtes auf die Ablagerung von 
Pigment,” Arch. f, Entwick, Mech. Vol. 8, 1899. 


bY 
ri 
Ms 
y 
5 
ir 


Fe 


DR. JOEL LUNELL 243 


12. Ortmann, A. E. ‘‘ The Alleghenian Divide and its Influence upon the 
Fresh Water Fauna. ‘‘ Proc. Amer. Phil. Society, Vol. LII, No. 210. p. 275, 
BOT, 305; 312; 3517 953° 

13. Pirrson, L. V. and Schubert, C. S. ‘‘A Textbook of Geology” 1917. 
Pp. 16x, - 

14. Ridgeway, Robt. ‘‘The Color Standards and Color Nomenclature.’’ 
Published by Mrs. J. Evelyn Ridgeway, 3447 Oakwood Terrace, N. W. 
Washington, D. C. 53 pl., 1115 named colors. 

15. Simpson, C.S. ‘‘A Descriptive Catalogue of the Najades.”’ Published 
by B. Walker. Detroit. 

16. Utterback, W. I. ‘‘ The Najades of Missouri’? Amer. Mid. Nat. Vol. 
JOO eta wloy oye 

17. Walker, Bryant. ‘‘The Unione Fauna of the Great Lakes.’ Nautilus, 
Vol. 27. 

18. Wilson, C. B. and Clark, H. ‘‘The Mussel Fauna of the Maumee 
River.’’ Report U. S. Bureau of Fisheries for 1911. 

19. Ibid. ‘‘ The Mussel Fauna of the Kankakee Basin.’’ U.S. Bureau of 
Fisheries Document, No. 758, 1912. 


Dr. Joel Lunell. 


A great loss to the science of taxonomical Botany was felt when 
Dr. Lunell passed away at Leeds, North Dakota, on Thursday, 
May 27, 1920. Living nearly all his life in a region which botan- 
ically was a fertile field for investigation scarcely worked up in a 
painstaking and orderly way, he brought to his avocation a 
love of nature, a clear discerning judgment of specific differences, 
and well trained classical education. He was born in an old castle, 
“Kalmar Fort,’ a beautiful place facing the Baltic Sea which 
was built about the year 1000. His early schooling was finished 
with unusual honors. His studies in medicine was finished at the 
great and historical University of Upsala where Linnaeus himself 
was professor over a century previous. The remarkably broad 
education in medicine, classics, natural science which he pos- 
sessed was augmented by a keen appreciative love of music as 
well as proficiency in modern languages. During his six years of 
study at Upsala he spent his vacation as tutor in latin and music. 
Among the books he wrote and translated about this time were 
some in branches as varied as‘the following. He published a 
Physicians’ Dietary Cook Book, and a Cook Book on Mushrooms, 
He translated into Swedish, his native tongue, from German, 
French, and English the following works. Physiologie de Got 


244 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


by Brillat, The Prince and the Pauper Savarin, I nnocents Abroaa, 
by Mark Twain, What Shali We Do? by Tschernyschevsky. After 
finishing at Upsala he touk a post graduate course at the Carolyn 
Institute at the University of Stockholm. In 1888 he came to 
America and became an associate to Dr. Fleisburg at St. Paul 
but longed for the frontier life of the new country and settled at 
Willow City, North Dakota, then a primeval town of a few board 
houses. Being the only physician in the whole county his zeal for 
his profession kept him so busy travelling around to help the sick 
that he was often eighteen to twenty hours without food. He was 
during these strenuous times also president of the village council, 
alderman, coroner, U. S. examining physician, and postmaster. 

Overwork forced him to relax for vacation from so many nu- 
merous pursuits; he left several times but always came back aftec 
a few months. In 1894 he came to Leeds where he held office as 
mayor, alderman and coroner besides his duties as physician. 

Dr. Lunell devoted his leisure time to the study of the flora of 
his region. He published some of his investigations in the Botanical 
Gazette and published several numbers of Contributions from the 
Leeds Herbarium. Most of his later writings appeared in the 
Midland Naturalist, notably a number of diagnoses of new species 
and a list of the plants of North Dakota. Unprejudiced by codes 
as a man of his broad classical training he throws aside any leaning 
to nomenclature codes of present expediency and adopted system 
of absolute priority of names for this list. He collected a large 
herbarium (30,000 plants) the specimens being remarkably well 
mounted, a collection which is scarcely without a peer in perfection 
of technique, exactness and completeness in every detail. The 
passing away of one whose love for nature was observation and 
whose pursuit of knowledge of the plants of his region was an un- 
selfish contribution to science leaves a gap that will be hard to fill. 
The following notice in the Leeds News of June 3, 1920, brings out 
other features of his life not already touched upon. 


A short time ago we were surprised to hear that Dr. J. Lunell was ill 


at his home and that his illness was considered serious. Always an active 
man and accustomed to be about daily it was hard to believe that we had 
seen him on the street one day and that he was seriously ill the next. Such, 
however, was the case. On Friday the news that he had passed away on 
Thursday night was quickly spread through the city. Another pioneer had 
passed to his reward. 

With the passing of Dr. Lunell this generation loses one of nature’s 


? wd - 
omicet alee Femail 


eg 


ies rer 


WATERFOWL IN NEBRASKA | 245 


noblemen. A lover of the great out-of-door and deeply interested in botany 
he mingled with flowers all his life, and the study of plants and music was 
his chief delight. His was a sensitive nature, easily hurt, but never did he 
allow hatred to enter his heart. Kind hearted and sympathetic, he felt 
deeply the pain and sorrow of those in trouble. Those who knew him best 
knew him as a man who followed Christ’s teachings in all that he did, and 
loved him for his kindly, sympathetic nature. 

Joel Lunell was born in Kalmar, Sweden, March 30th, 1851, and spent 
his boyhood days there. His father was Doctor of Theology and Philosophy 
and pastor of the Lutheran State Church, in which creed Joel Lunell was 
baptized. As he grew to manhood many hours were spent at the great pipe 
organ in the church and his knowledge of music gave him daily pleasure in 
later years. 

At the age of eighteen he entered the university at Upsala, Sweden, to 
study philosophy and medicine. 

He was married at Kalmar, Sweden, in 1884, to Miss Emma Swenson. 
In 1888 they came to America and settled at St. Paul where he was associated 
with Dr. Fleisburg. Later he moved to Willow City, where he practised his 
profession. In 1894 he moved his family to Leeds and has since made his 
home here. 

In the early days of his career he worked so unceasingly among the 
sick that his health was broken, but in spite of this fact he still carried on. 
During the flu epidemic of 1918 he did his bit with the other and younger 
physicians, attending cases night and day until the danger had passed. 

Besides keeping up his medical practice Dr. Lunell compiled a herb- 
arium of over 30,000 specimens of plant life, including plants from all over 
the world. During the past thirteen years he has written botanical articles 
for the American Midland Naturalist, published at Notre Dame, Indiana. 

Funeral services were held Monday afternoon from the Lutheran 
Church and interment made here. He is survived by his wife, six children 
and a brother. 

Fee CRA] 


“Waterfowl in Nebraska.” 


This very interesting and informing paper forms Part I. of 
Bulletin 794 of the U. S. Department of Agriculture. The following 
are the contents:—Introduction; Effect of Federal Protective 
Laws; Future of Waterfowl in the Sandhill Region; Natural 
Enemies; Hunting Grounds; Waterfowl Hunting in the Autumn 
of 1915; General Description of the Sandhill Region; Annotated 
List of Birds; Game Birds; Nongame Birds. 

Seldom have I enjoyed a more interesting article on bird life 
than the one under consideration. And an important element of 
this interest is the description of the Sandhill Region where Dr. 


246 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Oberholzer made his observations. I think this large and unique 
territory is comparatively unknown, at least to that portion of the 
community that is not especially devoted to the sportsman’s gun. 
But quite apart from the attraction that a hunter would naturally 
have for such a paradise of game birds, the Sandhill Region of 
Nebraska should be known to all Americans. There is probably | 
no other similar territory that can approach in their vast extent 
and unique character the Sandhills of Nebraska. 
As the contents of Dr. Oberholzer’s paper indicate, he has made 
a very careful study of the waterfowl of the Sandhill Region of 
Nebraska. The reading of his article quite makes the bird lover 
envy the writer the excellent opportunity he had to study waterfowl. 
Most observers, unless they live in a favorable place, near 
a quiet lake or river, can not become acquainted with water birds. 
This has been my own experience, and I often regret that my home 
is not located where the study of waterfowl is possible. Dr. Ober- 
holzer’s contribution is, then, of great interest to the student of 
general ornithology, and will, no doubt, be universally appreciated. 
A feature of Dr. Obecholzer’s article that calls for special mention 
is the manner of treating his subject. Not too technical for the 
general reader, and still of genuine value to the special student or 
the hunter, his paper is a model of attractive writing on orni- 
thology. The great detail (which shows minute observation) of 
the article can not be too highly commended. The author’s work 
has been so well done that the reader feels grateful to him for the 
knowledge and pleasure that were made possible by the perusal 
of this fine production. It is to be hoped that many more similar 
opportunities will be afforded Dr. Oberholzer to visit regions 
where waterfowl are abundant. This seems to be a phase of orni- 
thology in which the doctor should specialize, for his present 
paper points unmistakably to his ability to cultivate this field most 
profitably. 
BROTHER ALPHONSUS, C. 5S. C., 
Notre Dame, Indiana. 


BUFFALO 


Springfield 


ymilion 


PITTS BURGH 


Pik A Eee aT 
MAP OF LAKE ERIE AND ADJACENT REGIONS 
SHOWING LOCALITIES CONSIDERED 


CERTAIN 


PLATE II.—GRIER on VARIATION IN NACREOUS COLOR OF 


SPECIES OF NAIADES. 


(pit 


gE SGA EA SR ERE ET 
NOTE 


Contributions on general and midland natural 
history will be gladly received. Papers on botany 
and allied subjects, zoology, geology and_ physical 
geography, should be addressed’ to the editor. 

- Matters relating to advertisements are to be 
taken up with the secretary of the University. 

One hundred reprints of articles averaging 
eight pages or more will be furnished free of charge 
to contributors. More than one hundred separates can 
- be obtained at cost price of the extras. When articles 
‘consist of less than eight pages, a certain number ~ 
of copies of THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST in 
which the paper appeared will be supplied free, or 


ARR 


. 


5a RA RE 


J 


RU I VSR UR UC RUSS RR 


CF ae ae Fo ee oe ee ee eee Tee 


Publ} 
e the separate articles may, by arrangement with the 
a ~ editor, be kept until future papers average eight pages, 
#8 provided the contributions are sent in for the next 
a consecutive issue fo1 publication. Contributors of 
a articles: will receive a free subscription for the year 
a in which their paper appears. For further or other 
| . “information address oe 
a A THE Epiror, Notre Dame, Indiana. e 
se 1 tarzan aparece ui aa 
me . 
= 
‘ ‘ < 
a: 
= 
; 
& 
Z 


Gniversity of Notre Dame | 


NOTRE. DAME, INDIANA 


College of Arts and Letters. 


Departments of Ancient Classics, 
Modem Literature, History, 


Political Economy, _ Sociology,- 


Domestic Commerce, Foreign 


Commerce, Journalism, Library © 


Science. 


College of Science. 
Departments of Chemistry, 

Biology, . Pharmacy, 
Agriculture. 

College of Architecture. 


Construction, 


Physics, 


Departments of 
Design. 


Preparatory School. 


Variant Courses. 


College of Engineering. 


Departments of Civil Engineering, 
Mechanical Engineering, 


Electrical. Engineering, Chemical - 
Engineering, Mining Engineering, 


~ Industrial Engineering. 
College of Lat. . 


Colle ce of Fine Arts. 
Departments of Antistic Drawing, 


Painting, Cartooning, Instrumental 
Music, Vocal Music. - 


St. Edward Hall. 


For Young Boys.. 


Notre Dame is recognized by all educators, by the press and - 
by the public as a college whose work is of the same grade as 
that of the most highly endowed colleges or the best state univ- 


sities, 


influence in_ after life. 


The discipline is paternal, and aims at giving young men the 
fullest liberty consistent with earnest study and manly Christian 
reasonable. rates. 


character. _ Rooms at 


application. 


Address: ; 
THE ARE-GTS RAR 


NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


ee eae 6 Se oe Se ae ae ea ee 


Its atmosphere is strongly Catholic and no young man who 
has ever attended the University of Notre Dame can expe its 


Catalogue sent on 


{i 
1 
ay 


i: 
|| 
: 


‘VOL. VI. NOVEMBER, 1920 NWO. 22. 


, 


anetican MIDLAND 
NATURALIST 


Devoted to Natural History, Primarily 
that of the Prairie States 


Published by the University of Notre Dame, 


Notre Dame, Indiana 


/ 


J. A. NIEUWLAND, C.S.C., Ph. D., Sc. D., Editar _/ 


Ae alan Insthuti>™ 
i¢ 
y n 


/ JAN 28 1921 
CONTENTS . aa 


—& , sae? 
Variation in Epidermal Color of Certain Species of Naja es 
Inhabiting the Upper Ohio Drainage and their Corres- 


¥ 


9.” 


ponding Ones in L. Erie. N. M. Grier, Ph. D. 247 
Observations on Some Marine Plants of the Iowa Devon- 
ian, with Descriptions of New Genera and Species. 
Clement L. Webster, M. Sc. 286 
Birds Observed at Brookland, D. C. from Aug. 19 to Sept. 
7, 1920. Brother Alphonsus, C. S.C. 290 
PRICE $1.50 A YEAR SINGLE NUMBERS 30 CENTS 


FOREIGN, 6s. 6d. 


Entered as second-class matter at Notre Dame, Indiana. 
rate of postage provided for in section 1103, Act of October'3, 1917, 
authorized on July 3, 1918. 


THE UNIVERSITY PRESS, NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


Acceptance for mailing at special 


Back Numbers of “The American Midland Naturalist.” 


Vol. I.—(1909-1910) 293 p. Unbound 2 ee $2.00 
Vol. II.—(1911-1912). 330 pp. Unbound and exclusive of 3 Reprints 
to ‘be-bound iniend:of Voli noes ssa ee eee 2.00 
Inclusive of Three Reprints (see below). Extra_..._........--.-------------.----- 2.25 


Vol. III.—(1913-1914). 383 pp. Unbound, exclusive of Reprint No. 4. 
(See below). [Nos. 1, 2, 3, 7.) are scarce and nearly out of print, 


costine.50 cts; caches oboe bcs ae oe eo i ee 4.50 
Inclusive'of Reprint No. 4,/extracs sere eee he 
Vol. IV.—(i1015—1016):, Unbound ee ee ce eel 
Vol. V.==(f927—1918).. Unbound eke ee ye ee oe es Oe 
Total—$17.75 

Publications. 

Haun, W. Analytic Study of Faunal Changes in Indiana, 2 plates, 

IQIOA 27 PPL nee ee CS a iss 
GREENE, E. L. Leaflets of Botanical Observation and Criticism. 
2 ‘vols: Complete!) (roos—1912) 2 eee 6.00 

te 4 Cybele Columbiana, A series of Studies in Botany, 

chiefly North American. No. 1. (Other num- 
ers: to Follow.) hk ee Eee oe eee -75 

i Pittonia, A series of Papers Realting to Botany and 
Botanists,’5) vols. (1887-1905) 22 Se eee 14.00 

me Flora Franciscana, Parts I, II, III. [Part IV pub- 

lished long after the other parts, is quite 

unobtainable, as all copies not immediately 

distributed seem to have been lost in the San 
Francisco fire.] Price as published................ 2.00 

24 te Manual of the Botany of the Region of San Fran- 
cisco Bay (1894). Bound cloth. 2.00 
Witt ta ta se OE, a OR er 1.50 
(Price as published of latter)...........-------s---0-e0e-- 2.00 

UTTERBACK, W. I. Naiades of Missouri, 200 pp. 29 pl. and some text 
Pig wires oh Is BES BE Oe Le ea 175 
Reprints. 

RAFINESOUE, C..S)> Neogenyton:(9825) tee ee eee ee $i only 
i a The Natural Family of the Carexides (1840)_._..... .50 
nT uf Seadiography or 100 Genera of Ombelliferous 

Plantsfete.. (18460) Vere ie ee eee cave 1.50 


Monographie des Coquilles Bivalves et Fluvia- 
tiles de la Riviere Ohio. Remarques sur les 
Rapports Naturels des Genres Viscum, Samolus 
et Viburnum. -A Bruxelles (1820)...............-..- 1.50 
LEConvrE, J. B. Reprints of Monographs withou “ plates, $2.50; with 
42 photographic copies of unpublished plates 
(7x8), $25.00; with colored photographic plates...$37.50 
LECONTE, J. E. Two extra plates reproduced from originalsin N. Y. 
Bot. Garden. Colored, $1.50; uncolored.............. 1.0c 


_ The American Midland Naturalist 


AME, INDIANA ; oO 4nr- 
OF NOTRE DAME, NOTRE D ND A \ 9RQ 1091 
= JAIN GO 1241 


Yon ™S 


Ow. VI. NOVEMBER, 1920. NO: hia waset™ 
3 Variation in Epidermal Color of Certain Species of Najades Inhabiting 
; the Upper Ohio Drainage and their Corresponding Ones in L. Erie. 
7 s 
BY Ne Mic GRIBR, «PH.D. 
; —— 
| I.—INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM. 


This paper is a continuation of the study of the color problem 
in. certain species of Najades, first begun with an account of the 
variation in nacreous color in the same species. (4). Besides the 
major object as indicated in the title, now as previously an effort 


4 will be made to show how the standard scientific Color Nomen- 
clature of Ridgeway, (14), may be applied to the corresponding 
. descriptive characters of the species of Najades concerned. Again, 


as it has already been shown that changes in the morphological 
features of shells parallel changes in the accompanying physical 
conditions under which they are found, (1,2), effort will be made to 
show that in the epidermis of mussel shells, as well as in the nacre, 
changes in color which may-be similarly associated take place. 
The subject of the epidermal color of mussel shells does not 
seem to have been made the subject of extended investigation. 
v. Huber, (6), in studying some European and unrelated species 
remarks that the epidermis of river forms is generally brown, but 
at times a dirty green. Juveniles found in a subterranean canal 
were greenish in color,.becoming black with age. v. Sell (15) 
observed that the lake variety of Unio pictorum often had a green 
coloring, (or rays), posteriorly, which was lacking in river forms 
of the same species. v. Israel, (7), noted that the males of Unio 
crassus were often reddish, while the females were gray. Marshall, 
(9), states that ‘‘as a rule it may be said that the color of very 
young specimens when not affected by foreign substances in the 
water is a light or olive gray in the growing shell, gradually assuming 
the colors by which it is known in the adult state.” It is known 


248 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST ~ 


generally also that the shells of certain species at least blacken 
with age, but some effort has been made to ascribe this blackening | f 7 
in part to extraneous influences. Hay, (5), studied U. tumidus 
and U. pictorum from the Ouse and Foss, Rivers in England. The 
Foss river had the more natural conditions, a bottom of mud, 
abundant aquatic vegetation, a gentler current, and received less 
polluting material than the Ouse. Its shells were lustrous and with 
a bright nacre. The Ouse River was wider, had a superabundaace 
of mud in the bottom, and the shells in it were eroded, due either 
to the rapidity of the current or dissolved COz in the water. The 
shells from this stream were dark or dead brown in color, erosion 
of the epidermis was considerably advanced, and the pearliness of 
the nacre was dull, possibly because this stream received the 
greater abundance and variety of drainage material. Hey believed 
the differences in coloration observed to be due the amount of such 
substances received. We may add here in order the observations 
of two experienced students of the Najades; Messrs. Calvin Good- 
rich of Toledo, Ohio, and V. S. Frierson, Frierson, La., as kindly 
ous the writer in correspondence. 

“Shells of the same species vary in color of epidermis in different 
streaims, sometimes in the same stream under variations of environ- 
ment. For example, the shells in the pools of Roche de Boeuf 
rapids, Maumee River are rough and dull hued. They are most 
of them covered with limy deposits dnd blotched with some black 
material which after removal leaves the shells little improved in 
appearance. The Miami and Erie Canal, upon the bank above 5: 
these rapids, is fed from the Maumee 7 miles above. The shells 
of the canal are smooth, polished, often with a sheen like silk and 
lighter of color. The shells off Catawba Island, Ottawa Co., Ohio, 
are a bright, shining lot; those in La Plasaince bay, at the west 
end of the Lake, much dulled by comparison. The La Plaisance 
shells seem to be abraded by sand; those of Catawba Island es- 
caping this treatment.» On the north shore, many of the shells 
are stained with black and roughened with lime. Alge, limg, 
sewage, vegetable growths and mineral matter of one kind and 
another appear to affect the color of the epidermis. I suppose 
light has some share in the business. You have no doubt, noticed 
that the older specimens of the museums show a distinct modi- 
fication in color.” “There is near me a lake one quarter of a 
mile wide, two miles long, five to twenty feet deep. It is really 


:* J 


@ 


VARIATION IN EPIDERMAL COLOR OF NAJADES. 249 


the old bed of a stream defunct several years ago. But the small 
streams which feed this lake and which cease to flow during droughts 
both produce an abundant crop of Anodons. Now in the lake, these 
grow to a large size, much inflated, smooth, somewhat rayed, 
brightly colored. But in the pools of the headwaters, creeks ten 
to fifteen feet deep, thirty feet wide, covered with trees, full of 
decaying leaves and black mud, grow shells elongate, compressed, 
rough, black and hardly to be differentiated from Unio comptodon 
by its external appearance. Yet they are no doubt the same species, 
or no doubt frequently mother and daughter. This is environment.” 

Following the clues given in the foregoing, effort will be made in 


this paper to throw light on the following problems connected with 


the color of the epidermis in the species of Najades dealt with: 

1. In those species commonly assigned more than one epidermal 
color, to determine as far as possible the relative prevalence of each 
color in all the shells as a whole, and the difference between L. Erie 
and Upper Ohio shells in this regard. 

2. (a.) To ascertain whether any change in epidermal color takes 
place going down stream, both in the rivers and in their tributaries 
and to learn whether in any of the species a particular shade of the 
described epidermal color is peculiar to the body of water concerned. 

(b.) To study the prevalence and qualities of the rays of the 
epidermis under conditions indicated for this and the preceding problem. 

3. Asa partial check on problems one and two as well as for their 
own biological interest to show, (a) any relation existing between the 
epidermal colors and the estimated age of the animals; (b) any associa- 
tion of the epidermal colors with their sex. 


II.—List oF SpEciEsS USED. 


LAKE ERIE 
Fusconaja flava parvula, Grier 
Amblema. plicata, Say. 
Pleurobema obliquum pauperculum, 
Simpson 
Elliptio dilatatus sterkii, Grier 
Symphynota costata eriganensis, Grier 
Anodonta grandis footiana, Lea. 
Paraptera fragilis, Raf. 
Proptera alata, Say. 
Anodontoides ferrussacianus subcylin- 
‘dricus, Lea. 
Eurynia recta, Lamarck. 


UPPER OHIO DRAINAGE 
Fusconaja flava, Rafinesque. 
Amblema costata, Rafinesque. 
Pleurobema obliquum coccineum, Con- 

rad. 
Elliptio dilatatus, Raf. 


-Symphynota costata, Raf. 


Anodonta grandis, Say. 
Parapiera fragilis, Raf. 

Propiera alata, Say. 
Anodontoides ferussacianus, Lea. 


Eurynia recta latissima, Rafinesque. 


S50" - THE AMERICAN, MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Lampsilis luteola rosacea, Dekay. Lampsilis luteola, Lamarck. 
Lampsilis. ovata canadensis, Lea. Lampsilis ovata ventricosa, Lamarck. 

The accompanying map, and list of localities as given in Plate 
III showing collecting stations will give some idea of their distribution 
in the Upper Ohio Drainage and L. Erie. The material used was 
collected by Dr. A. E. Ortmann over a number of years, (1903-07), 
in Western Pennsylvania and L. Erie, or secured by him in smaller 
amount as exchanges. Dr. Ortmann, besides suggesting the value 
of an introductory study to the color problem in Najades, has done 
everything in his power to assist the investigation, for which 
data was obtained at the Carnegie Museum in Pittsburgh. I am 
indebted to Dr. W. J. Holland, Director, for the freest use of the 
Museum’s facilities in connection. 


IIlI.—PuysicaL CONDITIONS AND TYPE OF ‘MUSSEL FAUNA. 


The type of Mussel Fauna-has already been admirably treated 
in papers by Walker:(18) and Ortmann, (10-13 inclus.). These 
and the physical conditions concerned have already been sum- 
marized by the writer elsewhere (1); those for L. Erie being ably 
stated by Jennings, (8), and for the Upper Ohio Drainage in the 
Water Supply Papers of the U. S. Geological Survey.* At this 
point we may conveniently add Simpson’s observations on the 
type of Mussel Fauna concerned particularly with regard to the 
problem we are dealing with. (16). ‘‘Species from the Mississippi 
Valley are more richly colored internally and externally than those 
of any other part of the globe. . ... All the Mississippi Valley 
species of Najades that have entered the St. Lawrence or any 
part of the Atlantic Drainage area have become changed . . . the 
nacre losing its brilliancy; instead of the bright epidermis often 
painted beautifully with rays in wonderful patterns, rich greens, 
yellows, olives we have mostly dull, livid, ashy, rusty reddish 
or brownish exteriors.’”’ Simpson did not believe these changes 
were due in any measure to climate or colder water, for the shells 
reach a similar development elsewhere. He further remarks that 
the changes in form, size and coloring have led students to create 
new species and varieties for what were originally Mississippi 
Valley shells. For sake of convenience however, the outstanding 

* See Horton, T. H., Hall, M.R., Bolster, R. H. Leighton, M. D. “‘Surface 


Water Supply of the United States 1907-08. Part III Ohio River Basin, 
Pp. 29, 35, 47. Water Supply papers, U.S. G. §. - 


VARIATION IN EPIDERMAL COLOR OF NAJADES. — ~ 251 


points concerning the physical conditions are given in the following 


‘contrasting columns. 


LAKE ERIE 
Water colder than in Upper Ohio 
but with more even regulation of 
temperature. Currents much less rapid 


than in streams; less agitated, except 


by very moderate currents carrying 
but little sediment. Bottom of pebbles 
or sand or mixture of these depending 
on region of lake, with coarser sedi- 
ment derived from wear of land. 
Temperaiure conditions favor a more 
uniform production of food if in less 


UPPER OHIO DRAINAGE 

Waer warmer, but with greater 
extremes Of temperature to face. 
Streams more rapid than current of 
L. Erie; greater agitation, frequeni 
falls and rapids, short stretches of 
quiet poals. Rivers carry a load of 
debris moving quickly over the bottom 
which consists of mud, glacial fill, 
cobbles. Food conditions (due to 
extremes of temperature), are less 
stable, even if at times food is more 


abundance. Water is more highly abundant. 
alkaline than that of Upper Ohio 
Drainage. 


Walker, (18) observes that L. Erie shells as a whole have brighter, 


(clearer) colors than their fellows of the Upper Ohio Drainage, 


are exceptionally polished, and otherwise characterized in dis- 
tinction by their well developed lines of growth. 


IV.—METHOD. 


Befote attempting the study of the shells, the epidermis of each 
was lightly scrubbed with a moderately stiff brush to remove any 
sediment, etc., adhering to it. Care was taken not to injure the 
epidermis in any way. Shells so badly eroded that a positive 
determination of nacre color was impossible were ignored in further 
study. The method pursued in the study of variation in epidermal 
color was largely that used in the investigation of nacreous color. 
(4). Here as with the nacreous colors, the epidermal colors did not 
lend themselves to the determination of any well defined color 
pattern. The problem is even more complicated in the latter, 
since a large number of different colors may be represented in the 
epidermis, due either to inherent causes or as the result of the 
interaction, as we shall see is probable, with the environment. 
To simplify matters to a stage where the problem could be grappled 
with, at least two colors, obtained by comparison with the standard 
colors of Ridgeway (14), were recorded for each shell. Following 
the clue cited from Marshall’s paper, the first, (or primary), of these 
two colors was that, which by its lighter hues, distribution and 
relation to the other, (secondary) one taken was evidently the 


252 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


present if not the original (juvenile) ground color of the entire shell. 
In most cases this color was confined to the anterior and inferior» 
portions of the shell. The secondary color was that most evi- 
dent on the superior and posterior portions. If present at all, it 


was usually, but not always darker than the primary color from — 


which it was derived, and general observation showed that the 
regions of the shell where it was found, to be the place of transition 
from the primary color to it, whether to lighter or darker shades. 
Where there seemed to bé doubtful relationships between these two 
recorded colors, two or three additional ones were taken for the 
purpose of tracing genetic relationship in the sequence of color 
changes. The colors then judged most to match the Ridgeway 
Standard Colors were then written in figuring books opposite cal- 
culatings made for the morphological features of each shell. Only 
oue color was usually taken in consideration when effort was made 
to trace the sequence of change of color, but in view of the fact 


that color variation might be traceable as stated above to various . 


influences, it was thought well to possess data which would serve 
to balance the conclusions. In Pl. III, (whose synthesis is afterwards 
described), two colors are given, the first is the secondary color; 
where only one is given, it represents the sole color determinable. 
Further, as the specific descriptions given of some of the’ shells 
indicate that the umbo may be lighter colored than the rest of the 
shell, some confusion may arise when in carrying the writers scheme 
in mind, it is observed that in Pl. III some of the secondary colors 
are lighter than the primary ones, as obtained by the above pro- 
cedure. The general plan when the tables of distribution of color 
were prepared, was to give preference to that color most impressing 
the eye with its preponderance or vividness in the epidermis. 

The prevailing color then being alone taken into consideration 
for the calculations, tables were prepared in the following way. 
Where a large number of shells from one locality were concerned, 
it was the usual practice to group all shells of a closely similar epi- 
dermal color and compare as a whole with the shades given in 
Ridgeway. By this means a general or average hue was obtained, 
not accurate of course for every shell, but very convenient in 
determining the “‘relative colors’’ of the shells at that locality 
to ones near it, above or below in the particular body of water. 
As a rule these relative colors were taken from a fairly large number 
of shells, although a lack of material often compelled the use of 


- 


is 
~ 
e. 
t 
4 
2 
= 
> 


CF OE eee 
tw) 


ae 


eon Pe . 


2 es eS ae 


VARIATION IN EPIDERMAL COLOR OF NAJADES. 253 
smaller numbers. Against such treatment however was the check 
of a Separate color comparison for each shell. By means of this 
method, it was possible to determine for each species shades of 
epidermal color peculiar to the locality where the shells had been 
collected, and this being done, charts were prepared showing the 
sequence of color changes passing down stream, or the distribution 
in different parts of the same body of water. This data, in con- 
solidated form is presented in Pl. III. Even by this process of 
condensation, a very large number of colors was obtained for each 
species, making it imperative to simplify further in order that the 


- evidence for the relative prevalence of different epidermal colors 


in those species where more than one was described might be 
rendered more intelligible for report. Just as the systematist for 
rough descriptive purposes has picked out a number of the more 
prominent epidermal colors of each species, the writer, following 
largely Simpsons Descriptive Catalogue of the Naiades, (17), 
chose from the previously prepared charts the ten to thirty leading 
colors, (primary or secondary), in the epidermal colors of each 
species to which the large majority of the rest could be assigned. 
Percentages of these leading colors were then calculated for each 
species in the bodies of. water, drainages, groups of drainages in 
which they were found, as best seemed to throw light on the prob- 
lems to be attacked. While all recorded shades in a large number 
of cases would not conform to this treatment, they represent 
percentages in the extreme minority, and may be inferred to exist 
in those species where the tables of Distribution of Colors as a 
Whole does not add up to 100%. Strictly speaking, even this 
comparatively large number of ‘“‘leading colors’ could have been 
condensed to a smaller number, but the largernumber was necessary 
in order that certain close distinctions in the colors of the epidermis 
for the purposes of the investigation might be made, for example, 
between the colors of shells from a river and those from its tribu- 
taries. In the discussion of any particular body of water, however, 
the leading colors given, represent my reduction to lowest terms 
of the colors represented in it. 

Data on the sex of the animal, prevalence of rays, etc., were taken 
at the time color comparisons were made. So far as observations 
on epiderinal color as associated with the sex of the animal are 
concerned, the small number of shells on which they are based is 
explained by ‘the fact that the specimens were collected before Dr. 


254 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Ortmann’s discovery that the sex of the animal is readily deter- 
minable from the structure of the gills. In associating epidermal 
color with the estimated age of the animal, the latter was determined 
by counting the number of winter rings on the shell. As I have 
given elsewhere some discussion of the accuracy and inaccuracy 
of the results attending this method, (4), it need only be stated 
that the conclusion staken from the Upper Ohio shells were checked 
by similar ones from the L. Erie specimens, where this method of 
estimating the age is less objectionable. Moreover, the conclusions — 
are so general in character as not to be readily affected by mistakes 
in the age of a very small minority. Pressure of these observations, 
and also the fact that as a whole few differences could be observed 
in the texture of the epidermis of shells, lead me to disregard the 
latter character altogether. | 


V.—RESULTS. 


Each species is dealt with separately, there first being given in 
parallel columns: 

(a.) Descriptive material concerning epidermal color as taken 
from Simpson. 

(b.) The equivalent in the writers opinion of the Simpson 
Colors in terms of the Ridgeway Color Nomenclature. 

It is felt that by this arrangement and the inferences to be drawn 
from the names of the Ridgeway Colors themselves, it will be 
possible for the reader to sufficiently understand the terminology 
used as to convey the principles this paper hopes to make clear. 
Additionally the writer has endeavored to supplement this by 
the use of such generalized color terms as he could command. 
For the sake of greater clarity there are also given latterly in the 
Ridgeway column the peculiar shades of the L. Erie shells, although 
these are by the convenient and arbitrary arrangement adopted, 
but varieties of the hues given in the tables dealing with ‘‘ Dis- 
tribution of Colors as a Whole,’ in which effort is made to throw 
light upon the first problem stated. There then follow tables 
giving the relative distribution of epidermal colors in the Upper 
Ohio Drainage as a whole; and separately, the component drainages. 
The same is done for I. Erie and its various collecting stations. 
Additionally, remarks largely in explanation of Pl. III, (chart 
illustrating sequence of. epidermal color changes), and on the 
prevalence and quality of the rays of the, epidermis. The dis- 


VARIATION IN EPIDERMAL COLOR IN NAJADES: 255 


cussion of each species terminates with the evidence for association 
- of particular hues of the epidermis with the estimated age of Ee 


animal and its sex. . 
1.—Fusconaja flava 
SIMPSON RIDGEWAY ~ 
Brown Brownish Olive. 
: ‘Greenish Brown Ecru Olive, Yellowish Citrine 
= Brownish, Blackish, (when Bister, Dresden Brown, Sepia, 
a old) Carob Brown, Seal Brown. 
4 Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Drainage and 
; L. Erie. (275 shells). 
3 (SATS NESS ee aS BRS Oe rb he el eee Raase ROM URRY eal AE haa 40% 
é LEE ol a ead Ea A ARTE Wire cee a eRe Sa aOR a ae EAB MRR 20% 
: FEN EO NW MESTS) TACO 1 es er tes Bee eta ee ra een tel HE tn COs Rn ROE NE Ws Bs be ee | 20% 
Poparemeve tenets: 210-0 sete Mo Me oi ce oN ieee 10% 
£ Deere eran Hew e ee Hehe oN ae ee eee he ee se Mel 10% 
: ; Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Drainage. 
ss (225 shells). 
4 1 TES CKO Te 0 0 Wine ee agen ne ee a ee eS ene an EY ue teat ge se 40% 
. ister 2. = i ee aces Cache ett Rte a LEN tesa ie eh eRe Septet en ge) 20% 
ia TESCO hho i tW el! AC | Nig Sa is SSN 2 ee Be eu RM ie er er ae AMS LT. nk 20% 
E22 Se eS geal estar call sree aah Ne eae tae eee RANE DE BON Ae eB 10% 
EME MON Gre ee heh ep Seed 1) oer, eka Te in oly ee Coats Ye es Se 10% 
3 ' Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Tributaries, ete. 
2 Alle'ny Alle’‘ny Mon'g. Mon’'g. Ohio Ohio 
Tribs. River Tribs. River River Tribs. 
Wresden. Brows. Be <5 UGs.-022 OG. 20 Ae ee 
ISS RE SOI IP, Ogee aes ae rane eal Os PRG AREY, ae poli ine MaDe te. 20 Fp 50% 
SS Se ay ee Be ES ae NYO 2. 285, ye aie Sees 20°15) 20% 20 ae 
= Beemer ee 0) ands ss hee ee gy 2099.0 20% 2G YG 
SIBLE Cre 10 ee Meee ore Jee ere er Sere TE Mea 0) te aera rete Tain A ns SE AE 
Mellowisne: Citrings: 98) Sg 0 Se ee AO Of so clan he ee ae ee 25% 
PROMS BOLT ee aw eines See See tu SE eos 20 9p. AO pee Oye 25 U7 
Distribution of Colors as a Whole in L. Erie (50 shells). 
CSE Sa O07 BIT ig aE le os es ne a ar WR ee ea a SelM <P le OD a ee 30% 
: Bees yd Se Cs teed ra sent eu ome we RI NR le Sn 20% 
ea LO Walt= 4 co fests ep ES tt ccs RYE Ae ees oe aE oe ae 20% 
APES e es LO Wyle eee See Ie eS iy oe eS gg De Ue NG ae 20% 
Ecru Olive BAe AEA ap gy hh Me SP eee ah OE I ea nS Sa Ec elena MLS 10% 
Distribution in L. Erie,—localities. 
La Plaisance Cedar Presque Maumee 
Bay Point Isle Bay R.Drain 
; SATO) Oy] BY 0 Ni if I RPT: REN Feeepoee es Sea ae 1 Ae SSE OND GUN earner ima ik eee gear FS TenRaC 66% 
clowmastane trite, oa ee a Ps hy ane PaO ee aes 33% 
SSCEME LEGG Wc Ue ia Sel Oi sa nn A Sacer OR a Ra SS Me Eo NG Pa 2 ar ee ie 


256 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Dresden seo Pe a ted de eh ee Aa ee eee cn ae ed DE Os lak calm 
Beri Olives 2 eed See ee Py teal te ae PGi we Den os nee 
rarwamey - Olive Ss Fig 5 ore, ee ee ee GY eee SOU. 2ee Pps eiat  tntls =8 


Deductions from Tables of Percentages and Pl. III. 


Yellowish greens are more abundant in L. Erie than in the - 


Upper Ohio Drainage; the browms of L. Erie are of a reddish variety, 
those of the Upper Ohio darker, towards black. Generally, the 
shells of I. Erie are seen to be lighter in color. 
In the Upper Ohio Drainage. 

With few exceptions, the color of the epidermis is darker, in the 
rivers than in their tributaries, and darker at the lower stations of 
the latter than at the upper. This applies to both primary and 
secondary colors. At Crooked Creek, Creekside, the primary color 
is a sort of Greenish Olive, but lower down at Rosston, this is 
succeeded by a darker Yellowish Olive. The secondary colors 
has deepened to a Seal Brown, acquiring at a near station on the 
Allegheny, Kelley, a Cinnamon Brown, while the primary color 
has deepened to a Brownish Olive.* The same type of change 
may be traced down the latter stream, as well as from the tributaries 
of the Monongahela, Dunkard and 10 mi. Creeks to that body of 
water. As the Ohio River is approached, epidermal color becomes 
darker and darker. Some characteristic primary colors of streams 
are Brownish Olive for the Allegheny; Greenish Olive for Crooked 
Creek: . 

In L. Erie. ‘ 

The shells at Presque Isle have less Yellowish Green than those 
at La Plaisance Bay. Cedar Point is characterized by a large 
percentage of Tawney Olive colors, while the. Maumee River 
‘draining into L. Erie has an excessive proportion of brown among 
its shells. In this as well as in other species, different parts of the 
same collecting locality, such as the various parts of Presque Isle 
Bay, are apt to show a peculiarly distinctive epidermal color. 

_ Rays of Epiderms. 

According to Simpson, this: shell is faintly rayed in the young 
state. 29 of 275 shells had rays, mostly medium in size. My ob- 
servations indicated that they persisted in some until the 11th 
year. Raying was most abundant in specimens from the small 
rivers and creeks, rather than in the larger rivers and lakes. Their 
prevailing colors were olive, yellowish or darker green. 


* Names of Ridgeway Colors are capitalized in this paper. 


- 2 


ee oe es 


~ 


VARIATION IN EPIDERMAL COLOR IN NAJADES. 257 


Relation of Epidermal Color tc Estimated Age of Ammals. 


Young shells of this species in the Upper Ohio Drainage are 
mostly Yellowish Brown; in L. Erie, mostly Brownish Green. 
In the former.they become brownish or black rapidly as early as 
the 3rd and after the 5th—8th year, where in my material yellowish 
brown, was represented in only 1-8 of the shells. Yellowish brown 
and brown were nearly equally represented in L. Erie shells. No 
one color or group of colors seemed peculiar to a given age except 
the deep browns and blacks of old age or advanced maturity. 


Observation on Sex Correlative Coloration as Related to Epidermal 
Color. 

Older males are characterized by a Seal Brown color, younger 
by more of a greenish yellow. Females have larger proportions of 
more vivid Reddish Brown colors, while the younger ones tend 
toward Buffy Olive Colors. 


® 
2—Amblema costata 
SIMPSON RIDGEWAY 
Yellowish green Yellowish Olive. Yellowish Citrine, Dull 
Citrisie, 
Brown or blackish Bister, Mars Brown, Prouts Brown, Dresden 
Brown 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in. Upper Ohio Drainage and 
L. Erie (185 shells). 


BEC oO Lies COMET eee wie Naess IR eg fe age Ss Ts Rents ae 40% 
TEVASRECRS, “a SVC ip ale eek ee ie een a Seren AS RES I ro aENE eine With Bae ee Mente ne 20% 
Mars Brown.__....... SRG. ER oe Ea ale Fy eh fend een VEN ad Vey 2 ONY ee BREEN 20% 
Dresden Browne. Fh has, SE PRN ee TANS eat opt hE MT eh hi AUD A OUP RD 10% 
Jahiibae Uo eve VoR Se ns a kOe SR ee eee Tt Es BeMNeee. BOE BOR MED Ti RANE 5 Rpg 10% 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Drainage 
(107 shells). 


PLOWS POLO a besa a rans Pk AERA ha i s''  T  l 30% 
IUPUI AVAS EUs CC METAEIe eee a ata i AC eh iy le Oe 0 RS see tae SRR 20% 
TOMES G bev Bama ira ce weet are ee ee See ed IS ed eR es eR NO deen MRO SBP I Fa 20% 
DESISS ae ie dee Pant a NT oA ee ewe a ee we Reet eee oe aaa ee 20% 
Sian Ob Ihine een eek Ree Rls ableton bum pen ee ee WR Aas eee ee 10% 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Tributaries etc. 
Alle’ny Alle’ny Beaver Beaver Ohto 


Tribs. River Tribs. River River 
PLOMuauarO Wale fe ee Pe eg he et AG. GO 97 2 ae eS a a 
WellowisieGttriie: sen 5 es oe DOU pose ere Ve 7 aaa Lo) eee 
Dresden rowalle: ey estat oh em ee AOU ete FIN. TOGA Aon ete Ls 50% 
JESUS Sah ee pe ae oe a Rn RY 40% Oo ee oe 25% 
Ey iibinyee OUCHIING wane Re eke) ee oe Toe Se Nis Pan felis 


258 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in L. Erie. 


PLOUtS BLO Wie ocho SN se ee 30% 
Dull < Citrine 7s See ie Eee oe Pete orn ee ee ee 20%. 
'YVellowish™ Crtrime ccc ssc ee ee ee ee oe 20% 
Mars: Browne r.2: 25's ws esr cr Ce eet ee ter 3 cate 20% 
Vellowishl Olives. 2c. Sees ee Se eee ens eee 10% 
Distribution in L. Erie—Localities. 
La Plaisance Cedar Presque 
Bay Point Isle 

Proutsm@Browne eis So we Se ele Se ae SO Upiescetee tet vg) Wien Se ae 
PTI bA Ost Tee tee te ee Saat ae eel isis! Aes sage eh ie OV ka? ashe Sass 25% 
Vellowishr Citrine? ok = 6 Ss as ee ee ee DBO; ne a. eras 25% 
IVES PO Wiles te. Se teies tweet Oe Ae 365 Off ON a SATE eA, See 
Wellowish Oliver. 22 ein Rat ore tg: ae Tee ek eens SOU, ee 50% 


Deductions from Tables of Percentages and Pl. ITI. 


Yellowish and greenish hues are most abundant in L. Erie, 
showing that shells there have brighter colors. There are more 
buffy or darker colors in the Upper Ohio Drainage, where reddish 
browns are characteristic. 


In the Upper Ohio Drainage. 

We observe from the above tables that the darker browns are 
more abundant in the rivers, the lighter colors in the tributary 
streams. Primary and secondary colors are observed to darken 
descending the Allegheny, Shenango Rivers and French Creek. 
Characteristic stream colors for this and most of the species of 
shells dealt with are best given in Pl. III. In the tributaries the 
colors are usually greenish yellow hues. Characteristic stream colors 
are yellowish green. (Citrine), in the Allegheny, greener shades 
of Citrine in French Creek, buff varieties of this in the Shenango, 
olive varieties in the Mahoning. At the nearest approach of these 
streams to the Ohio the shells are found to blacken. 

In L. Ene. 

Presque Isle shells have yellow colors, La Plaisance Bay, brown. 

Those of Cedar Point are more of a Yellowish Olive. 


Rays of Epidermis. 
Simpson reports no rays for this species. 4 of 107 shells were 
rayed, persisting at least until the roth year. The rayed shells 
were L. Erie specimens. The prevailing color was Greenish Olive. 


Relation of Epidermal Color to Estimated Age of Animal. 
Juvenile shells are mostly yellowish in the Upper Ohio, those 


4 


5 hes 


Fé VARIATION IN EPIDERMAL COLOR OF NAJADES. 259 
N 


from L. Erie are green. L,. Erie shells have also a larger proportion 
of green with advancing age. Shells in both become black and 
brownish with age, but in L. Erie later than in the Upper Ohio. 
These old age colors appear at 4 years and are complete at 9. 
No one color or group of colors was found to be peculiar of any age. 


Observation on Sex-Correlative Coloration as Related to Epidermal 
Color (11 Shells.) 
Young males are of a Buffy Olive color, becoming reddish brown 
with age. Females in youth are of a Yellowish Olive hue, becoming 
brownish red with age and tending to blacken. 


% 
3.—Elliptio dilatatus 
Dull green, young shells Buffy Citrine, Yellowish Citrine 
Yellowish brown Bister, Warm Sepia, Dresden Brown, Ani- 
Darker, when old. line Black, Chestnut, Cinnamon. 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole i in Upper Ohio Drainage and 
L. Erie. (561 shells.) 


ITGSh sist Igoe ee I ie ae eM en ee ee eed fe Ee or eee ee 30% 
WN au ELE, SSIS TON IRE eR lek fli ee elie LOE Soe RE cr tie Pa ee EM ae SLE EL ASAE nc 20% 
ees dete Brow 12262 ees ot Stel See, Sher LS ROD tc SRAM, pp yg al BF 20% 
aan oot Peat 6 ae fs Pret Pe ats ee ee ot Re age 20% 
(a Taint 2 SRS SRR ee OE RR pec ke Gc Ne ae 10% 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in the Upper Ohio Drainage 
(509 shells). 


PBASteIe aa gereeatany ei 9e P O atln y M oe Se te ane Me Pee | isthe w aiatetas Oi. 20% 
Why eiteraans “Sy ejoa ic Sa eee St errs oe Beale Ns so ee a EL PN ey SM Ue Rea 20% 
reenter inies st eee se Ml Lhd erney AP a AL A ree Set OD 2 IN I Eee SiS 20% 
MinecdieiterO Wiles eee kee Ee Lh sey Gerling tcite ihe C8 (yok vides 2) ea aes 20% 
Steg TEN ORT TLS PIN pe eet te seo eRe Re ee RE I ROT Gn Stee SP ASE Sey eee 1 ONE 
TESE OMEN Gia OUR Sec Aaa Sng eh ae AU RELI LURES qe MRO rr eM AEE. ° 20% 
Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Tributaries etc. 
Alle'’ny Alle’ny Mon'g Mon’g Ohio Beaver Beaver 
Tribs. River Tribs. River River Tribs. River 
nS tenenas wenn ete a OPI AG OG) DROS elk@g Fjame 215 ee Te GEES aes 
Warr Sepia! 150522 2 DAG yest DOG piee MORO shes A Oe 2 iene 30% eet 25 Yo 
Dresden Brown___......... DEBT SEA OG rt tise 9 pes Vata Daas Pye) tomes Tyo eee 25% 
Pedly Brows. ioe net BOW err £25 70 Pana. ? ae DIB a i ee > 
Bro wilisiie Oliver sa Fe ete Te ey Ci as Oh Sia aie ole Bae SOU 
Distribution of Colors as a Whole in L. Erie (52 shells). 
esa itels Ove tie. es ee he eS ee a eee YS) es tee ss 20% 
cesar eee Es ronvuli ein ee es ene Se hd we Oe red Oe Ge ee eS Pa eee 20% 
~ Cinnamon Brown... SE ese ein tate ange ee tte ei ste GA 3 eee Sethe se Sa Ws Ears See 20% 
Vice Shia Gibeiiien. em. Beiet aa ie le veh e es em SE) Os) es Bs Bae 20% 


PNctat ead kone leahes pacha ttn. Wey Mod trey | bap prs ed DS me ee) he Cas 10% 


260 THE, AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST . . 


; » 
Distribution in L. Erie—Localities. 
La Plaisance Presque I. Chautaugua L. 


Chestnitt “Brow oe iss ase ee ee ee ew 25 meet 25% 
Dresden... btOwdl 22. siete eee ee eee ee PA) [ae ee Ae 215 OF, or nn een eee 
Cinnamon “Browne... eh eee ee 25 ges Eee oo Ue eee 25% 
VellowishC ririne.%: 11s.) Age $2 eee Ss ates SOGjEs ee ok Chen 7 tare 25% 
BrowirishwOlve so os ae i ea eae os ete ee 2507, a eee 25% 


Deductions from Tables of Percentages and Pl. III. 


L. Erie is seen to contain more yellow shells than the Upper 
Ohio Drainage, and its browns are of a lighter color. Black seems 
to be in a minority in the Upper Ohio Drainage. 

In the. Upper Ohio Drainage. 

Here we observe there is a greater percentage of dark colors in 
the rivers than in the tributaries. A general darkening may be 
observed descending the Allegheny—the primary color, originally 
of an olive hue assuring brownish and buffy hues, while the second- 
ary colors pass from light reddish brown shades to dark ones. 


A similar change may be observed in French Creek, the Shenango 


and Mahoning Rivers. A characteristic stream color of the latter 
is an olive shade; that of the Allegheny, a brown. For others 
see the combinations of primary and secondary colors presented 
presented on PI. III. 

Buffy primary colors characterize the Allegheny, Brownish Olive 
French Creek, Buffy Olive the Shenango, Olive the Mahoning. 


In L. Erie. 


La Plaisance Bay alone is represented by yellow colors to an - 


appreciable amount, those of Presque Isle are prevailingly brown. 

Chautauqua Lake stands out for the absence there of vivid 
reddish shades of brown. 

Rays of Epidermis 

Simpson—‘‘often faintly rayed in young. specimens’’—32 of 
509 shells were rayed. Rays may persist as late as the 14th year, 
and were most abundant in specimens from small rivers and 
creeks, were mostly medium in texture, and Greenish Olive was 
their most common color. 


Relation of Epidermal Color to Estimated Age of Animal. 


Dull green is more plentiful in the young of Upper Ohio shells, 
yellowish brown in those of L. Erie. Shells from the former darken 
rapidly after the 6th year, in the latter about the 8th. The mature 


a 


VARIATION IN EPIDERMAL COLOR OF NAJADES. 261 


or old dge colors of brown and black may begin at 3-4 years and 
be complete at 6. No one color or group of colors was found to be 
peculiar of any age. 


Observation on Sex-Correlative Coloration as Related to Epidermal 
Color. (15 shells). 


Males have a larger proportion of clear brown colors, young 
males are largely brownish olive. Females are represented by 
larger proportions of reddish browns, young females being Buffy 
Olive. 


4.—Pleurobema obliquum coccineum 


SIMPSON RIDGEWAY 
Tawney or yellowish green 
when young. Buffy Citrine 
Brownish Prouts Brown, Mummy Brown, Mars 
Brown, Aniline Black 
Reddish Brown Seal Brown, Warm Blackish Brown. 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Drainage and 
L. Erie (263 shells.) 


EATROURES PES LO IW il: cts seer eo an eae ew oe dee er, i Ae ol eae 30% 
Mummy Brown............. pola eA AE eer NE, Ran ee ne Wich MENT Re RI 30% 
Miaks “Browite 22 ot fo 5 Aiea PERM ty APs BG Re Be Pests NET gee gm Ae be wal 20% 
Tip yae OTGIit Ghee eae eene ewe fet ee Sohne ioe Da 5 Sey, eigen Rt ats 10% 
PEC REL LTO ates eet Ope Sr Tt 2 Nee oe Te Sor et dn pe ha eee 10% 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Drainage 
(247 shells). ~ 


ESCO PIES pubis Oly, Fuses eens Pas ee ete By So ee ee hg, | Ue a tees eee 30% 
IWIN Tay hO Walls a nee ae a ete ett ante tk Jeet Red) ME eles ee ASE ial aes 30% 
IMR TOW sn Gal Coe A Tae Pa DIO nT Or. Uwe iet POT Bre T Bet me Be 20% 
VBS aTs vA yh See a Pele tees A gt DO a Paes ea a eee, a 2 eNO ear eh eee eC 10% 
Jah sae TM ice BA ee yo Feo aa LN cs I Ed la Pk Dadi Ts BOM ARON See CIEE Nt Ly 10% 


Distribution of Color as a Whole in Upper Ohio Tributaries etc. 


Alleghney Alleghney Beaver Beaver _ Tusca. 


Tribs. seed Tribs. River River 
Praiis Browns... Bad OES ile eM De BO Goi Bae PA Ge a eo ine ek DO frce mae e 
WiniiMAT ype OW lt eS. eee yn ie 35% coun 50% ae 30% :.~-25' Te rath 75% 
IV (ZW SM Bh RCo 41 01 Somes et yee ROE aa ee SENS jo Naas oi a Din. Wy arees Di O/ wah ng tenes 
IRON ER yam Crit ee bo ke aca be eee eg aera me Eis 10% Thao \2g0 0! eae A pra BI au UT 
Je\catl aoe an By be KO) “<a U9 Oe p? Seok 5 Is ame PA Sas) Co alle ined Ke 2 

Distribution of Colors as a. Whole in L. Erie (16 shells). 

Warm Blackish Brown......... Egat SA Boe ig, ee RAN eee EN ee ARLE af 20% 
Cinamon- Browtlh ae 2 RGA peal te, cea ies ah em SEE esol bes ee Set a 20% 
naa ee Tike] means Cag ee Oe ree gma ewer, Ae De EE | te es SO ee 20% 


262 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Seal Brownie bee, REAM MORP RL ry!) ewe Vets ly SPE PEE WAU RS ey TEC Ca ZO oie 
Birtty + Citrine... oo ee A ee ee ee es A ee eee ae 10% 
Aniline Blac les 2 to.) tek. hoa NOR eae as se Se eee a ae 10% 
Distribution in L. Erie—Localities. 
La Plaisance Presque 
Bay Tsle 

Weasm blackish “Brow0: 2 2. See oie de ee a ee ee 50% 
CimmamoneBrowitte hla Fas Ie eee eee eee {oly (ener 2 
TEETH Gt Ae Or 8 hh of Mae Pitine Se oer eRe Le Dh REO, PSE, 5 INS ES i SO ee 25% 
Seas tO Wiles ees hes ee Re Ci ae a nee Ona seek eet penis ae ee 25. 


Deductions from Tables of Perceniages and Pl. III. 


Again we find that the shells of L. Erie have lighter browns and 
greater percentages of yellow. 


In the Upper Ohio Drainage 

The darkening of both primary and secondary colors, (Yellowish 
Olive and light browns to Brownish Olive and dark browns) is 
observed descending stream in the Allegheny Shenango, Mahoning 
Rivers and French Creek. In many cases the darkening in second- 
ary colors can only be traced from tributaries to rivers. Some 
characteristic primary stream colors are olive in the Allegheny, 
yellow or brownish olive in Crooked Creek, greenish or brownish 
yellow in the Shenango, Yellowish Olive in the Mahoning. _ 


In L. Ere. 

The shells of La Plaisance Bay are brownish yellow; those of 
Presque Isle are prevailingly blackish brown, like those of the 
Tuscarawas River in the Upper Ohio Drainage. 


Rays of Epidermts. 


ce ’ 


Simpson—‘‘shell rayed when young.” 27 of 247 shells were rayed. 
persisting in some cases until the 14th year. In quality, these 
were finest in the largest rivers, medium in the small rivers and 
creeks, where they were also more abundant. Prevailing color was 
Greenish Olive. 


Relation of Epidermal Color to Estimated Age of Animals. 


With age, shells become reddish brown in the Upper Ohio Drain- 
age. Data concerning L. Erie shells is fragmentary, but as a rule 
in both, brownish, tawney, and greenish hues decrease with age. 
Darkening occurs early, about the 4-5 year. Older shells are mostly 
reddish brown. No color or group of colors seemed peculiar to any 
given age. = 


AUIg [PYS Bag 


AVId TPYS vag 


yng ystyurg eyeq 


yng 
YystyUlg meq 


yng 
ysyug eyed 


VLIVLISOO 
VLONAHdUWAS 


SAD ae 


SNOSIBUIA YS] 


qrid 
ajding y1eqd 


ABI. 
snososvurA dsaq 


SnoOsoeUl A 
YstAeiry aed 


qeiq snosoeul A 


qeiq ading 


a[ding 
SNOVIEUTA YSI’T 


reaaet 
snosde1YIO Id 

JapudsAe’T 
ystAviy 


uOWeUUID 
ystyUrg Med 


AVI 
SNOIICUTA IIe 


I0jOD 
ysay aed 


JIPUIAB’T 
snosovul,A dsaq 


SNOIIEUI A 
YStAeiry a[eg 


aiding 
SNOSDPUTA YS] 


SOLVLV TIa 
OILdI 1TH 


Jel 
UvISIOg Ieq 


ang [ved 
en[q Ajivog 
ABIL) JETT 


anjq einuedmeg 
wed 


JJOIA on _ 
ystAvis) py BVT 


alee 
OSu0D 2%ed 
WNANIDDO9D 
vVWHaoNNa Id 


JIPUsA’T 
YystAeiyy 


JOPUdIAB’T 
YStsAeiyy 


VLVLSOO 
VW TaNV 


VAVW Ia 
vivNoosna 


Sinqsae’J “ID Yyoouueysan “1Z 


PART JoAvag 6L 


‘ed ‘IMO ]SSUTUOYRIL 
IA Suruoyeyy “gL. 


S}IOAOD JAR BurmoyRyy “LL 


TAH Jeary Surmoyey “9Lt 


or0quip sy 
IDARY Buruoyeypy “SL. 


O1gOQ YSInNqs}HAvaT 
aA Surmoyeypy “vl” 


youviqysey “ID YouuvysanN “CL. 


YOorqyseyy “ID YyoouueysaN “cL. 


YIIQ 12930 ‘of 
ssplig 1oqiey 
IAT os8uvusysg *69- 


DISeynd 
JIA OSuvusyS °8g: 


HOVNIVAG AXAIY AWHAVA 


NOILVOOT 


ISSNISIC] satvadc ou] ul JOO") SI0eK] jo uonee A jo osueyy peuted SUIAIT) Wey") 


yrry 


{ ing River 
avittsburgh 


ing River 
nboro 


ing River Hillville 


i Conkoa o 
ormacyuanesist 


-Connoquenessing Cr. 
Harmons 


Connoguenessing Cr. 
elienople 


, 6 (Cpamsqucuea(ng Cr. Ellwood 
‘ity 


& Brav2k Cx. DRAINace 


Little Beaver Cr. 


ttle Beaver Creck 
it. W. Branches 


Gane Partial Range 
TION 


pce 


of sai a Nacre Color in the Species 


esa 
tia 
Showing Association of enon Shades of Nacre Color with Certain Loesh 


ues: 


SPECIES 
PLEURODEMA INODONTA ANODONTOIDES = [ PARAPT } 
ss ERA OO 
COCCINEDM DILATATCS | COSTATA GRANDIS FERUSS. FRAGILIS | Meoenctarn | eR | LAMPsiiis LaMrsiLis 
Pale Conko Light Vinaceous | sa j_SOTROLA OVATA 
L Pearl Blue 
Light Grayish Pale Grayish Pale Pinkish |Light Pinkish Lilac 
Blue violet Vinaceous 1 [Fear Ries Ligie, | Rea 
: | Pale Pinkish | x a wees bet Blue Violet 
: Bee | 7 
Tale Pea cae | Sea Shell Pink | i ay! x 
a = Light Grayish | 
= a "Blue Vielet | Bite Wiskten 
ish Light Vinaceous | I By (iach Violet 
prea = Pale Purplish 
z i 
Pale vinaceous Purple Drab | Sea Shell Pink Diss et | Vinaceows > 
Shell Pink Pale 


\Grayish Blue Vi 


White 


Pale Grayish 
Blue Violet 


Vinaceous Drab } 


Campanula Blue | 


Pale Grayish 
Vinaceous 


Pale Pinkish Buff 


~ Light Pinkish 
Lilac 


White to Pale 
Aniline Lilac 


Pearl Blue = = 
Light Pinkish 
Lilac 


Pale Cinnamon Pale Pinkish Buff 


Brownish 
Pink i 


Vinaceous 


fi Salmon Color 


| | Pearl Blue | at 


Pearl Elue 


{ | White 
: | sine : Pinkish 


Vinaceous Lilac 


Vinaceous Lilac ig | 


ttle Beaver Creek 
annelton 


ttle Beaver Creek 
New Galilee 


Onto - Raver 


Raccoon Cr. New Sheflield 


—e 


Deeper Hermosa 


| Pale Pinkish Buff 


A 

| a] 

| _ Pearl Blue Pale 
: = \ Grayish Blue Violet 


Deep Vinaceous 
Lavender 


Pink 


Pearl Blue Light 
| _Pinkdas ile ¥ 


Pearl Blue Pal 
| Pinkish Lilac 


Light Purplish 
Vinaccous 


Sea Shell Pink Pale Grayish 


Blue Violet 


Vinaceous Gray Light Russet White to Pale 


Ohio River, Shippingsport Pale Grayish 
Vinaceous when ~ Vinaceous | Lilac 
‘Ohio River, Industry Pale Vinaceous Pearl Blue Pale Pale Vina- Light Purpli ; ——~ 
. inkish Li i Light Purplish White Pearl Blue to Light Pi ine 
; a, Gray : Pinkish Lilac ceous Lilac Vinaccous Pinkish Lilac ; Peart Dine oe 
ATT eau’ | sau aa a a \ ~ = 
95. Ohio River, Cook Ferry Pale Grayish Pearl Blue to Pale Laclia Pink 5 5 = 
a Vinaceous Light Pinkish Buff alee neni | ale ce eon Light Pinklslt 
[=e I - = : x } Lilac Blue Pe 
Pen HO. River Smith's Ferry / Purplish Lilac Pale Grayish Pale Purplish —— wai 
ae Blte Violet Vinaccous 
Lake Erie | = im 
— } 
97. La Plaisance Bay Mich Light Gray. Bl. Vio.) Light Pinkish Burn Blue Deep Vinaceous Light Buff, Pale | Pale Pinkish Hydr: P, ieht Plakiet —_ 
“i Light Flesh Pink Violet Gray Cinnamon’ Pink } Lilac y range hile esaricicse: Poe ree 1 
Cedar Point, Ohio Light Salmon Pearl Blue Vinaceous Laven- Peisl Blue Light Pinkish Pes ‘Rhodoni 5 
ie Seange ee : erie 3! earl Blue Pale fon Light Pinkish 
- —~ = a — a 
Vermi Ohio Pearl Blue Laclia Pink Pearl Blue 
. PREsQuE ISLE Deep Vinaceous | Pearl Blue 
“Lake Erie off Presque Isle Lavender | 
"Presque Isle Bay Beach ; Light Grayish Blue Pale Bluish Pal = 
Pools Vivlet Pearl Blue Lavender ale Rhodonite bey f 
Paul Blue Light Pinkish Pearl Blue 


Pond 
North Shore 


id West of Water Works 
Big Bend off Waterworks 


‘Big Bend, West End 
ig Bend, East End 


3S 


isery Bay 
Crystal Point 


Lilac 


Light Flesh 
Pink 


Dep Lavender 


Pale Rhodonite 
Pearl Blue 


Pink 


dht Pinkish 
lac 


Li 


"Violet 


~ | Vinaceous Lilac j 
| Pale Verbena Light Vinaceous Pale Ochraceous | Pal Aniline Lavender Pale Rhodonite Hydrangea Pink | Pearl Blue Lavender, Pearl | Light Pinkiah * 
Violet Purple Salmon | Lilac Pink Blue, Pale Lilac Lilac 
Deep Grayish Lav. Pale Vinaceous Dark Vinaceous Pale Ochraceous } Pale Aniline Pale Pinkish Light Purplish Pale Pinkish Lilac White Pearl Blue 
Pearl Blue Pink Gray Bufl = Lilac Lilac Vinaceous Pale Rhodonite Pine a 
Burn Blue Pale Pinkish Buff Pale Bluish Pale Vinaceous J 
Lavender Pink 


Pearl Blue 


Burn Blue 


White, Pale Pin! 


Pale Persian 
Lilac, Pearl Blue 


Pale Congo Pink 
Lilac 


Deep Vinaceous Pale Pinkish Buff 


Pearl Blue Pale 
Lay., Pearl Blue 


North Shore Crystal Point 
‘ DiessHoc Bend 


“A 
"Pools, L. Erie 


103. Port Colborne 


10. |. Port Dover 


Verbena Violet 
Light Salmon Pearl Blue 
5 Pearl Blue 
Pale Bluish 
‘ Lavender = 
RES eS, —————— 
Pearl Blue 
White to Light 
Pinkish Lilac 
Pale Aniline 
} Lilac 
| 


St. Mary's River 
eskiort Ohio 


ay Silver Gar 
liams Co., Ohio 


108. Maumee River Rapids 
aumee River 


Maumee River 
lan Co., Ohio 


je Grayish 
Violet 


_——————————— 
_ 
———————— 


——————————— 


(a Ee 


Grayish Lavender 


Pale Grayish 


Blue Violet 


| 


See 


, ' VARIATION IN EPIDERMAL COLOR OF NAJADES. 263 


Observation on Sex-Correlative Coloration as Related to Epidermal 
Color. (13 shells) 
Older males have warm reddish brown colors; in youth, lighter 
yellows and olives are representative. Females have a greater 
tendency to blacken, and have darker colors throughout life. 


5.-—Symphynota costata 


SIMPSON RIDGEWAY 
Yellowish Green Buffy Citrine 
Tawney Brownish Olive 
Brownish Bister, Chestnut, Mars Brown, Prouts 


Brown, Mummy Brown. 


Distribution of Colors in Upper Ohio Drainage and L. Erie 


(68 shells). . : 

TERS UST OO SIN A a oi ON eee ae i es No 20% 
Psrgpinvaaicstaun(®) lice anes Sauk» OP eee SEE eee orig es. es 20% 
TBSOUGTS , (Cites bra es 6 oe ee ee es eae ep ae 20% 
Teta teem aN Rae i as EY ee ae ea a as ee ae 20% 
TC eair gy TERT Cp Ses ss a So eo eR WL at ERIE 20% 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Drainage 
and L,. Erie (47 shells.) 


Digi SEP amen heme ated oe he an ee ef 4 sua feet Mea 30% 
Brownish (Nineteen eee OA PEL SCAT Rati. a ote MwA 20% 
BEST symn (Ohl v take aia VN i eee anna ALUN ele A # an hi We Rat te 20% 
Mummy Brown ............. SRE ee MEIN sible SON op be tas AB Dek YAN te le ea 20% 
NSIS ee Teene Bnd stn vn teal tile en here ee SEG ONE a Oe SSA AAS a IND aioe ot ona 10% 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio T tributaries ete. 


Alle’ny Alle’ny Ohio Monong Beaver 


: : Tribs. River River River Tribs. 
AYY/ felch Oe ASS (=) of ee ee ane Ua ee ae ge ee a ISG) Gye ONO une Sa Pai final ea mee 2 
Browash) Olives. 82 oe oe 16219 let) Seen 215 Ons ONG pen Rees 
Bitty Olivies =. ars wan 2 es SS ei Oey i We ee FOG. SOUG 4 25) pee 2a 
Mummy Brown... Gea Cath Poa. BY 2 ect eal G/L SUNN ME Te RNa NO 25% 
TENT Sie Loe UE IS PA ON AMEE PD Lace TDA G2 Olas Die NaN ML Ta 13% 
Distribution of Colors'as a Whole in L. Erie (21 shells). 
Si eitlayer Catia lesen tare yen oa y YEE Jo RIA ee UN ee CFLS sl EI en aN oe ae 40% 
KOs ibrar se va toy os ellie sed DEE lL aS ioe ltr lait Ee 4 rie a le 20% 
HASTA ERGO SU LS ae Re 2 lo DN RP Vea RET Sa PR GS UO SUR ee ra Mele ene 20% 
21: O CUS TO Wiles aes RRO ORC INN EL Seal Lays BES Se Ra 10% 
NW Tettrnnttasy areas OW weldioow eee Shue Pee, Care te Sams SA be Mikael UN Naan. Seine a 10% 
Distribution in L. Erie—Localities. 
La Plaisance Presque 
Bay Isle 
BES sina is Tei hee ee eet er rane oie en eet eee? ty hee nha eee Uae Dh beans oy 
(EINES ter teem ome Ws Onteniente eM Ul gino, Crneie See ea PAE fw Uman TUE 50% 


IN [rai Sprig FO Witlnaoeae 2 FASS ie Ear | ibe Sot ARENAS Tie LOA es DH rs Desh ea 8 25% 


——. 


SEV] ueisisg 4 | 
aed 93 aI ang | QF] 
peg | iT INT 
= | | Save | owes wiry | someVena | sna nea ee 
ond eed i ang besa | blige E39) } | - = 
} SROIIEIMIO aeq snoaseury daaq | INIA Bead | DPT amy seq ae dysmy Suing 
tee mom | A | | “ewig “1 Fuiumemsg ‘99 
ysturg 14207 proures | Seip, | | | 
OSSEIEPO ASd | Smoaeaiy aseq | yurg KeuayrgD ang preg | — 
— yajoray, ang rae } | | AIMASyIeTD sary oFumuays “So 
i! aed TAR aiding ung 
peensesoT A ; ie Pee JOSpuLM 212d snoaseut aqsrq | snosnius0 wNsty | Sinden lates ; ‘a 
5 : ' oduruagS “Ay oSunuays “tg — 
i WA anig s9pusacy ; = 
e — qsikerg aq2ry — -——- +. stioaany | = 
= = = = = - —- ithe == SS SS DWAUIAH “GaN OSuvuays “£9 y 
ae prad eigen 2 SO10EA 2716 5a Tk | 
ahd Dicioracoen | asceg 2 qrzq atding 38d IPAS uacisurel ieafyl OsumsgS 
f SET siya | _ fare xe 
WAT ania ead | 
- = - } i z | UMOYs[ENH ‘ony qdjopuyy “19 
sued aha a | | — 
g 4st Styutg 2eH “ ; 
| a = aries aTASoUYT “3924 ape “09 
}- } 
SOVNIVNC YSATY WSAVAG 
Aug | 
snoaseuty aeq | i 
APIOKA ON Yst iF SNOdDEUI A PITA 7 - pia ees" s ‘ 
PID AV ‘OCA, qassmy 34407 epqoT aed 
= | ‘ a | | quoMeypy “ary moO “SF 
| qua -| ee 
4uig essuespsy aiding Ont Pe 
j= a = — Suv pws SAL ai id 
| HOLA ANT YstAvIS) a 1 lis - AUT PLOT WAT ONO, et 
ra OF qriq a1ding | | 
= F = 5 Me | syodorso> “DAT OHO ‘98 
Dey ystqurg SEBIET SHODIEUL A DEV] snoaseury i | x a 
rT OF ay AN aed 01 YAN aug SnOaseUtA aed AVtd IPys | reg anig pswag bra | . 
= sari os os fo = -| He aI ystiotg vd | PeesE STAN UATE OO Bi | 
 auyruy [ra | | | houreumy — | . e 
tc: 3 {= ‘s FE | SHA 91% samy UD snag FS 
i +I — 
= ae. ae E { } SOVNIVAG AAATY ONO. 
SP ysiqur ep ysis in i 
TAY AN qyary OF ag SOSH NoTee sty nLC aquest 
oe al A ule | P A ystkesy req | _ BAT vpyetaonoyy LS — 
ec ae iRRTEERA OS | eee ; | ung “OD puVjazounyss\y 
oo Abs 2 a pea shalt SM hf E } - ysEutd aa } JAY BYE TUONO PT 
uomrtaur 
2 ol oc Sa ad eet i eal il Eee eee MONE Lg ait oa 
; qed IOLA oa 
at 4 -- 2 SUGeuE CE fat MUIQIIA MAIvd | JAN VPYWIUOHOWy “OF 
CAG Es I- 3 1 | u J 
ysiqurg 1440] Fi } womeuniy aTASUMID 
=. a{< A 3 ie 2 ale | qsiyata Md | 3M IN wy, “HF 
FOIA ONT 2 1 
YSstABr5 veg natkeroten | snooowOrA ’ 
- -——_ -| - ae | (3 4\- 3 :. 4 | ysidusg 910g ALY “Y9UD ON MT “Bh 
* ung { 
| IOLA Sanqsoudy, 

“OUT uvlsiag ated Ni al , elle Ysriuld eed TuaqiaA Id 4 ‘1m or ues ated é 
_ snoaarur, i mies | M 
ysthvsy aed 5 ale te ae Avi adoi olay | uoueS Wary OHM 4D paqund 

; |-- -| > 
snoaoeut\, yur snoaouuty Bune 2 
aS Ate p ang Led | Ng domes ysydang sry oom aiuvig avg ] asunig wary SOW UN “M Paryand 8 
Pekierua ajdang snoaa W | a 
eo Mone eed | i iy ATR MEL E i WaADEL WayD GOAnT wang “He 
oe bi ale i 4 ee HOVNIVAC, “A YUIYONONOTY — 
ee One ants ania i Va IPL) 
| bea oan | silt Led 18d Si BRE e nt , 
Seep ae = 4 = 
i ane snoaorut, o%} 
’ b Peo AA ysyding yay YW aaa 
i ante (oouss0QF MON) 
eae 2A = | aeod | Dany yinwuraTOy 
P a Ata SIWIN SHOVES: 
AW Ing snosse1y9Q snoaovulA Jy ArT TIUOWUUTIICY voy a 
ELIE t 7 
ae Peaq 03 ay AY apMIO HL "AIA MONA “OL 
y ; MOVNIVAC AMAL SVUENUEIM 
~ oun 1 He * see omy ustqurg | snoaseury | ee ee a laa Laan SNOVEUT AY OES JOOKA ONL AUT 
sturdy at 7 AMAT OF AIT YstAeI aed Aud ys | ustidang aay | ea TA SAETO MPAs OS OUI ey | 
} qeiq snoao : 
“Pury IEC 
Oe] yse{uta 0 VIOLA anieL : 
ayary OF aI AL ysixerg wavy apisyvas 
HOVNIVAC] XTTUD aXOOKD, 
Japusar’y VIOLA ONT Ae AVI Auld ayApoog 
07 ang zee ystdvig aeg = snoaseur, daaq Avuayeqg aed youd Aumoqey epavy “Se 
¥ SOVNIVE MAM ANTAL GIT 
i 
umoyodooy ‘yaax9 avdng “FE 
ne | = = le oe 
IOWA AUtad niet 4 
aug yng yshqurd ares uenaua A Leo IaVT (49949 at) MHA 
VIOLA ante OPT i VIOLA ang UT onl 
ystAvig aed UrISIag Id ystkeig aed Auld 14S BS snoaoeur, 34307 rod (19949, 
(ae g yur i WOLA anita snoaoeury ania ona 4 
oyuopoyy ered YStAeIg aeg ysyding Aapudae'y WYysVT Lead PNG ayn’T anwauUED 
———— Be 4 a = -| = “(= 
snovorul,. 
ysiydand a04S “AV ayvy nou 
a e ea 
JOPUIAR'T - 
snoaseut, daaqd 04S “AH 
ms | ‘ JJOrA anig ORT snoadeut\ 
qstéeig W43rT ysitard garT, yStU org, | 
‘ ysitumosg, 
, OPT ystyurg | PNT 1 
i Mar 1 cee ree : - auyiuy ated fa iia AppudAr’y 
|  ouyry uvisiag: ung 
| aq OF DTN anid Lead ystqurd ed Pe ay 
| JA1OLA ani ; x POA ONT ey aayinnayuor 
ysidviy aed Ystkess ajeq | . oy We = APT op ke 
etry 5 hw . a= . id eal 
ani QUINT st lor ania ant sfuudg api at 
ted At AY “AULT OF 93 AL ystheig 2yRIT Avuayrq) i udg s#puquied Re 
a a lis 5 =| ] 
? any ung DEI] snoa2 Auta IOLA | lee 
ie SESSA Wea snoasesy90 a[td “Pu 14a wonemsA | eee rPd peal! 
| > =| = -| - a | HOVNIVACL ANAS HON 
--| - - - am | | 7 
ti WIOLA INIA Hog ‘|[fAseuN, 
YstAeig atd | puog ‘AIIt 
= =| =. a ry 
ES 2 EIT + 
ystjding | f | é RUOAEN “ANT Get ye 
2 -|- | 
ei fe = anid Ayuayog “sary Auays 
snoareut, oe peag i ral | piel ahd |). 
BIT WSPiotd 209, 
M31 STAN yng woUleES Is anid Pd 
= = = = "| ond ona 
qurg peed Pad | 
DUNT ata aay AL osu05, = - : 
o 4 Fs Ong W307 | | 
x 0} INIA 1b } 4 =) 
z - = 4 DeIYT ania Avg wOmTeS 
snosounr, bine - ana fe at, SnoaseUrA Ie 
a ystiding 3437 W591 : ysryutg eyed snoaseur, 34307 peed 4 
- 2 : =| Tain eh a 7 s9purary Balorn anid 
WPIOLA MUL ania Lead ©: : ‘ . oaorm, daa ysteeig aed 
Tee aed OEINT ysryatd uM uvlsiog aed peed uom[es aed | snoaenrA d99q N 
= = 5 391A ani SENT 
= snopanut,, ant . sl ee en eee ysiknig 14887 muaqiaa aed 
mn “ |e eS aaret eee ee eee |e | - 
——— a a i —— ~ ~ -——- , GACT IF f 
a a Roucegice i= aeare 
ani eed ueisrd aed : 2 ! - ——— - | 
“UIT QUINT ent ' Bias 
ae ata anrprmy aed ystyurg yar ysuding 34507 ni = 7 
2 5 5 snoasrur 
é qsidang wT © 
= =| = SENT Bali: § 
| eee SnOS2eaL A ped 
: | ; a aiding snoz.ru SnosEUtA INI 
JOPUIAe'T ’ qstyata 1A 34307 ystkerg 1g9t7 
OVESTANY ania led 2 J 
- - | | SnOsDEur A Avig, snoaEn ania 
utq auop Sat ’ ystseig aed “yy ded eed 
¢ a eg al IO, 21 pemrene. tee 
qstkeig Fd qsrigid ed Fa 
= i | ee et 
STON INL a gsryuid ard SS nS 
SAzte SerT ystyetd : 
NOSES + SMOSSEOTA J 
QUIET SUIT ystamoig 
ystutd 34ST ysieatd 9507 > 7 
— a 2enT 
a ep usted SUT usta SnOSJEDIA 
3 Ped OF TAL - 
MISE 03 SL dass = —_——— | aidan 
yurq 9100p snosseni A 392!7 
“OM WET SBT Asta | es SS ee 
= ~ } nomyeS grid aidmd 2 
“ snoases>0 343!T eeu FT 
he | - a *Ly¥iVTIa _ "NID209 wivisod | 
yios1a7 vijay ¥LVIV srmpvea ‘saa 5 aoe pera ae aerated enone vivcosaa : 
SHUSER¥T VINASAS, vusiaowd vealavuva Saqd1OLNOGONY c -AHAKAS 


‘ sHIdads 


ESpEyG UlcH= jo WourIoe== hy SUUKCUG IP 


ae 


+a 


wjeoor] wreTOT) HALA 1o}O-) aIeNY JO 


Sea ae 


sorsadg atp ut 0102) ae Jo uoneLEA Jo 9BUPY 


aa == - Ee 4 


264 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Light colors, (Buffy Olive), are apparently equivalent in the 
Upper Ohio Drainage and L. Erie, but the browns are deeper hued 
in the latter, much as in the preceding species. 

In the Upper. Ohio Drainage. 

Shells from the rivers are darker than those from the tributaries. 
A partially incomplete series of darkening primary and secondary 
colors may be traced descending the Allegheny, Shenango, and 
Mahoning Rivers. This would be more complete had more material 
been available. Characteristic primary colors are Buffy ones for 
the Allegheny, Citrine for the Shenango. Due again to lack of 
material, there is no outstanding differences between the shells 
of the Monongahela and its Tributaries. Darkening of the epidermis 
occurs descending the Ohio. 

In L. Ene 

Presque Isle shells are distinguished from those of La Plaisance 
Bay by the abundance of browns, and the practical absence of 
yellow colors. 


Rays of Epidermts 
Simpson—‘‘often rayed.”’ 3 of 68 shells showed raying, in shells 


g-12 years of age, and persisting at least until that age. The 
prevailing color of rays was greenish olive. 


Relation of Epidermal Color to Estimated Age of Animal. 


With age, the Chestnut or dark colors become in the majority. 
Darkening may occur as early as the 7-9 year, and seems complete 
at 15. ‘‘Greenish’’ is always a minority color. Darkening occurs 
less rapidly in L. Erie, and the percentage of yellows apparently | 
increases with age in the Upper Ohio Drainage. Young shells were 
not plentiful among my material. 


Observation on Sex-Correlative Coloration as Associated with E pider- 
mal Color (6 shells). 


Within the limits of the small number of shells considered, the 
males stand out for blackish colors with age, and Buffy Olives in 
youth. Females had lighter browns than males, and young speci- 
mens were Brownish Olives. 


- VARIATION IN EPIDERMAL COLOR IN NAJADES. 265 


6.—Anodonta grandis 


SIMPSON RIDGEWAY 
Greenish brown Yellowish Olive, Olive Green 
Brownish green Brownish Olive, Ecru Olive 


Other Colors: 
Buffy Citrine, Varley Green, Straw 
Yellow, White. 
Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Drainage and 
L. Erie (119 shells). 


SBuRONGEMS] Ab TON iG ee De als a al Me ea A OR PR ee eo A 40% 
Se BAN CEN GE SUN UG Tig ges, et SRR Yer § 1 dD ae RD IR MR eg 0 eR Ce RPGR I PS 20% 
Olive Green. _.....: Rai eiNies peed (tae BWR Bees VI Pe EN eR 20% 
Terres CNTR Se ES 5 Rg a th ee ee ee 10% 
TS jusRtSy (CIMT a SPEARS eA Pte 5 Se a Phat 0 Ne ig ie ee cc ee Re 10% 

Distribution of Color as a Whole in Upper Ohio Drainage (97 
shells). 

SE INO Ginn OP TP ere Pag ot es eee a ae a 40% 
Orineeechee ewer ee aoe cee ane Spee ea ete = Jet ae ee ee 20% 
prenmas Olive: ae sie Yi bee te Lee ee ate Za aoe, ee 20% 
Sareea ue 0r na AR a LOR POR ye Ne ee ae 10% 
To ive G 7 SAP tai NS iad ttl eA RR a aR RR A ROR SIS cts he 10% 


Distribution of Colors in Opies Ohio Tributaries etc. 
Allegheny Beaver Mgnong. 


Tribs. Tribs. Tribs. 
Brownish Olive Yi Ler pa eo au roe RN ae AT 5OVaeao PA tele eee eee 
OlivisaG res nte 4 I e j) Va wet oemeotghs bic Mio Nt FPR Ns Di Opes sae 25% 
CC TBC OSeI OVC. tenes ce eee oT SE a, bie ST AD ICA Y A eens, ML Eee 2) 25% 
(LIE ea SMa See ear ae A Zi isihe Aaa gi Bis Of te eel ee 
SESE ACerS ae ie a Ao hea et a nee ieee TOs BU) doa ee 
BV ICCTirNER aE RON The enc wees See rms i tee ys a tt Ne Eee eae 50% 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole ined. Brie and by localities. 
Asa La Plaisance ‘Cedar Presque 


Whole Bay Point Isle 
MIRTLE Sk ee cone tt BO. AY epee 2 Oe 25% 
Ecru Olive. ct seh Ae aR eer Fa eioc t i ns BO Re ore ae BOG soe 25% 
Weimer: wise hese er a PY iy Aika MeO AGES OBER: FASC LE Eh 25% 
Baracew mY ClRONGS eek eye ee eB ho 1) ae RO Ggte e 25 ps 25% 
a tie ren Nee eg er Sot A aad DL), ee D5 gion ee, oe ee 


Deductions from Tables of Percentages and Pl. III. 

The L. Erie shells may be distinguished from those of the Upper 
Ohio by the abundance of yellowish and greenish yellow tints, those 
of the latter being Brownish or Yellowish Olive. 

In the Upper Ohio Drainage. 

A darkening descending the Allegheny was observed in the 

scanty material at hand. . This is more evident in French Creek 


266 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST - 


where an Olive hue is taken on, and to some extent is evident in 
the Shenango and the Mahoning Rivers. Characteristic primary 
colors are Yellowish Olive for the Shenango, and Varley, (bright) 
Green for the Mahoning. Shells from the Ohio are deeper in color 
than those from Raccoon Creek, a comparatively near tributary. 
The Allegheny Tribs. have the most Brownish Olive, the Monon- 
gahela Tribs. the most dark brown, greenish colors are most abun- 
dant in the Beaver Tribs. 


In Lake Erie 
Yellow colors predominate at La Plaisance Bay, Olive at Cedar 
Point and these are equivalent at Presque Isle. 


Rays of Epidermis 


Simpson—‘‘rarely faintly rayed, but showing 3 broad dark rays 
on the posterior slope.’’ Only a few specimens from creeks were 
noted. In these the rays were bright green and medium in texture. 
They were present at least until the 14th year. 


Relation of Epidermal Color to Estimated Age of Animal. 


In the Upper Ohio Drainage, Brownish rather than Yellowish 
Brown increases with age, but at old age, these colors seem to be 
equally prevalent. The old age colors of brown appear at 6-8 years 
in both groups of shells and may be complete at this age. L. 
Erie shells are mostly green at first. No colors seemed peculiar 
to any given age. i . 


Observation on Sex-Correlative Coloration as associated with Epider- 
mal Color. (8 shells) 


In this small number of shells,-males were distinguished by a 
preponderance of Olive colors; females ranged from yellowish 
green to brownish hues. 


7.—Paraptera fragilis 


SIMPSON RIDGEWAY 
Greenish yellow Olive Lake, Deep Colonial Buff, Yellowish 
Citrine. 
Pale Smoky brown Brownish Olive, Buffy Olive. 
Dark Colored Ecru Olive. 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Drainage and 
L. Erie (58 shells). 
Bert Olives. nce eet ee eee 30% 
Deepr Colonial Bath ee Ne see ane eee ee 20% 


* 


' 


VARIATION IN EPIDERMAL COLOR IN NAJADES. 267 
Parrett NOM Vier cee eS ek ee ee eee ea eae ee ee 20% 
CON OIL gai ele TES ihe RRS eR A Ee ee tone PRO 20% 
TRU? OUTING Se nt see Gore IOI SSS Na 8 NI ey chao Vena ea oe Seen AY EN 10% 


Distribution cf Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Drainage 
(28 shells). 


Absa rate Oty ceea eee ne Pee, KON een a wey Nae Tn NE Ls ek nN Sane 20% 
CHURS: Tbs) Wy SEED 1 a UT ee UN CAR Us 2G Ee ee Rt eae ee TURMNROR MRIS Det acids 20% 
Bronvaisa (OLN e.4 oct BE TOUS E.Mey Oe TAP ena Bn 2 Ashe bat selon eta 20% 
SFE Wrse Tyga) Lan eer aet 8 Sead teers on, A a Aen ae 20% 
Rises Nour roan GLEN eae nee rere Radiat ne eo es et Ee ap a ae 20% 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Tributaries, 


and River. 
Allegheny Ohio 


River River 

TE SIE OUT Te gOS SANT ane ORs RAL ON ka Ne Se OR AAT Ee REG es 2 od er 20% 

QUIN RSeTLFSN) Rf SUDA aS a Oe FR ok 20 La GE PR ee 2 Of ee eee 20% 

Bowailishts Oliver rr oo: et ae fi Rie eo depen ty SNe a de BOs) ae 40% 

EMU INV Gua: eat Meneses Ceveeee ae eee cn Sle RPEe eae heen ICTY (eR mi POBEE 

Rife lows ne hitless eee ee ee Aer TR FL are h ly She. bedi een ee eae 20% 
Distribution of Colors as a Whole in L. Erie (30 shells). 

Summa cigar | obi Waren eee 0 2 te ek hee Se te 30% 
OTE TS lei) thy Cx eeiee ented Vee Sie at ee Paes ee do ee 20% 
SAcerndos™ Oliveseeeye 1 nile ee kee, Ue ees Per ON gon eed Seas 8 a eee 20% 
Beeb: QUES a eee Ee Ie, AGATE 1s poh, tn eee Rea ies eee tee Ne 2e2OU 
GrayisheOlive:. 29. ORM GA certian cat tobe: Piha 1S SS Pe pe a a 10% 

Distribution of Colors in I,. Erie—Localities. » 

La Plaisance Cedar Presque {sle 
; Bay Point Bay 
Deep Colonial Buff sd, Be See Nga a) eal eye a hae 500je Eee 20% 
Bawls laa Oliv cl eeaee een Sie, SN Ae a ae Be OF Sas ee ate eee aes ioe 20% 
saccardos Olive... mit Res ee eet) Re erg ont Be Ofer one 20 a aaa 
[SESS OL SE ite a SO, ie eA eae ea pie Oe. wal tet ats ge, 2 eae 40% 
Le sseanN SUTTON Vie cement, nec eg ee Ea TS ee a BsiO 7) ete ieae aN 20% 


Deductions from Tables of Percentages and Pl. III. 


Shells from L. Erie are lighter than those from L. Erie although 
both possess many colors in common. Buff colors predominate in 
the former. 

In the Upper Ohio Drainage 

Shells darken, both primarily and secondarily in going down 
stream from the Allegheny to the Ohio. Olive Lake is a character- 
istic primary color for the former, Buffy Citrine for the latter. 

In Lake Erie 

Buff colors are in the lead at Cedar Point, Olive at Presque 

Isle, while Grayish Olive seems wanting at La Plaisance Bay. 


a 


268 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Rays of Epidermis 
Simpson ‘‘Often rayless, sometimes feebly rayed’’. 37 of 58 
shells were rayed, the oldest age being 13. The texture of these 
from the lake was prevailingly fine those of the rivers medium. 
The-most common color was a Dark. Green. 


Relation of Epidermal Colors to Estimated Age of Ammals. 


In youth, 1-2 of the shells are either Brown or Green. Most have 
become of a greenish hue about the 7th year. Green is more promi- 
nent in L. Erie shells. Old age colors may appear at 6, completely 
at 14 years. There appeared to be few if any completely dark 
colored specimens. No colors seemed to be peculiar to any givenage. 


Observation on Sex-Correlative Coloration as Associated with Epider- 
mal Color. (5 shells). 


In the small amount of L. Erie material only green colors seemed 


to characterize males, yellow, females. 


_8.—Proptera alata 


SIMPSON RIDGEWAY 
Brownish Mummy Brown, Buffy Brown, Bister, Light 
Blackish Brownish Olive 
Olive Green Buffy Citrine, Buffy Olive 
Reddish Dresden Brown. 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Drainage and 
L. Erie (55 shells). 


BTEC er een ar Be a aes ee Sh a are ay peepee see NE SO ee 30% 
Mitiminiy: Ser Ow! 22) er te ee Ae nn Bac ROI ee OO 20% 
Bait yao Wilk ne. os. eRe Sen Mee et eld CaN TUR CE 2 eee ent oo 20% 
IBS her so Mere 8S Se SS ire eee ee NE RR ea ete ca eo 20% 
Bugthy” Cpbriame. 0s ee eG Na Sle ahs ini ee eee Sn 10% 
Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Drainage (24 
shells). 
OTT P ccd eT a ae aE ee MRE CME i a eat Be a ea een 20% 
Mitniniy: Brown 2 oe Sill See Aer at that oe Spee Re oe Ve Nol. Sea oe 20% 
Privy Olives 00 pe eo eae sa Pe alee a cra ag ee 12209, 
Sa ae bal 5) ERs eee een ae PEE eke Seo oS ee Dh Ve aie eG Pe ere 20% 
WH AB EO WH so 3 St ee ag a Locate 9 ee re a eal ne 10% 
Saccardos: Waber ss. a. ee eee a se eee eee pe 10% 


Olaye’ sf Re eg ON tn) Sea CENA le ah 20% 
Miimimy > Browit2..2 Riko) ee Pee eS re ee eee ee 20% 
Burfhy-) Oliwes: shakeela OP Sh ds corn” A Nae eee eee Se ee ee 20% 


Pe ee eet ey ee 


© 5 Sites 


ye 


Se LS ge ees eee 


i a . . Ss -: ' ; y ae i : 


3/11 pOOD) 
ba) 


eee ts 1 ee tee Og, T——— aa SMD ed 
by Pe in sejogh — 1/2 NS 


VINVA TAS WN NA d ese 
Ero gsan7 cy o 
{ D// 10 8a OYE O 
Oped: 


NaadaImM 


M 


5 paving: 
oy 27 pi OS 


PUI tOSYAOs> 


06u buags 


Dy IOUeaaH 
UmMmoysawor 


opSo4oll “2 
© 
BImMmaACrIwW MT hues 
s6y1ade 
~” pate pone, 
AD -puojAos) 
AsaoywotH 


eae a See ee 
3467 vacavsnvHd | 
wot2/29 | 


LAI ef SIMA. 


3 N 


—— 


ql0adS NIVLUHO AO AO1OD TVNUACGIAH TO NOLLVIAVA NO Waid fav id 


‘SHaVIVN HOS 


oe oe 


| 
G3aysjadISNnood C7 WEL. 0 | > ! 
ONIMOHS : 
J9OVNIVYC OIHO HYy3addN | 
wom ev W BN | 
= oh BWWiNS Wao) >? | 
s+ 
tae by be | 
math. ; 
iP | 
Bur 4a:uo0b7* se 8 ‘ 
a Pa a | 
S2uBO/4 MAY : ; 
la WAog PL : (2p pues mow scam ) : Edie | 
sei . : oS ae | 
x HOUNG SLlild % 1 
° As | 
~\ aoe | 
| 
hagso pur f 


ZOYNIVYd OLHO y3addNn 


G3ayiaGIsSNo>D s3 TLTIVIOO1N 


ONIMOHS 


ao. ae WN 


ae ow Tes 
SY] W 
Swox4O4S 
& 
a 
ov 
Guin 
purus 49/0 06/7" Ce 
p 
As 
SouB37j74 MW z 
f~*, waoy =@PL 5 
< 
\ = 
2 res, < 
7 
° 
~\ 


esgorisy 


I 
(V) 
ig 
=) 
wo 
va) 
b 
id 
tH 
[ate a 
ay, 
darter 
g 
it) 
) 
S 
Ny 
g 
\) 


A 


2 
aia: 
Ai in<ouna OLY 


wacom eEp7 


Suor¢o, 
Yay Vv 


2122 sazes \\e 
OY, LU ysanvad @ 
QV wos 1Q4A90K oe P . 


VWdousa/a7Z 
S 7 / ®Z, 


igs 
42f “ng 
sno46sow > Sud uwvo, PYytO S 
me Jie . 
dus bur ssawenbouu0d surg *+OY4 
“aj iNpooD ay at = 55 Le : 4°94 OFA ancy 
76> ~Zo4 OW OH+/7 ~~ 


y Tiga WS 


'M Sojleg Byra ey: 
Lov 


a] 
qi rma | 
of br 9427S i Ae 
¥ v Ul 409vDpyy ~<a | 
49 bir gsoey we. " 
y 
| y | 
P1004 OG) 
ve! 
aoaid 3 
4 la WlIOLHYAOsD { 
oA &7 pu os 5 
064 bu ays Son 
ff - 
Ar uvarva ' 
eg +04/0M d DIP N UPa4D 7 
Pe Bbapeters 4. 
y o> 40 i 
of OM Of Spt fy sed 
S 4 O4420D “ry Wi? 
hla cio te) ) “m5 42g d 
Le, v 
Vi syne : 
opsouo | 
| 
Bmacvaw 
buasad | 
Sesgmes 
re gyorg | 
oe = 
puojac 
Asowz1H 
Sue? vocawinvHe ! 


fy SS) 


G3YSCISNOD sS3ILI1¥I071 XONIMOHS 


SNOIO3Y LN39Vfdv ONY JIY¥3 3IWvI 43O dVvW 
dS AY Sled 


Biota Cae ew, 
eg Vorst a> 


piaif burace 
--—- SG a) CoN 


VARIATION OF EPIDERMAL COLOR OF CERTAIN 


PLATE IIT.—GRIER on 


SPECIES OF NAJADES. 


VARIATION IN EPIDERMAL COLOR OF NAJADES. 269 


sAIBCUNTEGSy TRUE Ye) ENS IE SPE SUEDE flee i, CMT gm ticked Ce NR ae Ag nO EO se 20% 
SHEN URS TBM AYE tte Bek a al AR 8) RRR aL DR ae ON 10% 
DaccaRaos Wimpbere 0 >! ste ey: dah Pac ete) i Seen Neel ot DIR Ae a oe Bees 10 % 
Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Tributaries. 
Alle’ny Riv. Monong. Riv. Ohio Riv. 
OUR GR 25, oO 1 ENR SESS Sena Wd Sea Raieneosdg 8 Ad nee San ite ee Odo eS ee 2 On Se 3 a BO, 
DVintertnnny: Ss RO Withee uh et EE ve ay oh BO pie eee Lean O/ a ekelonS 8 AT abes 
Eerie vane @) ravi eaten tenant eee talgr a ot  el Ree ily ga A od a ah SE es 25% 
sitive mp lacks 200s) a ey iss 2 Mieke ily SUED tee Uh As RET oe PIU ERC Lea TEL 25% 
SVEGENE?. LBW FCO) (Ame ea sel Ae PRUE aad ae fea mnt) SAL ar Ma aii Le 25% 
NAeCrLGos sWimtibere 2. awe 8 es ae ee EBS N/a en AP AN eo a canes Ie oe eA 
Distribution of Colors as a Whole in L. Erie (31 shells). 
Light Brownish Olive_._........._.. De Rae INDE, JI RTA fia Die Mook es 9 Percale 30% 
ENtHEV ANNO TEEN eee Sent Nee Reb oer Le ean UA Be Os Re Ty Pe oot Mya 20% 
Bigthye Olivestis 8. sh highs tie NISMO A 2 hae Rona NE eee OLE A Ee aterm: yD Se 20% 
IMUTELaRVTN Ye IBA) ial tae Sree eo hs eran ek OR SN es ely een eS CRE NER seed te feet 20% 
HOES etiee STO Wille here ene eee wine Pa RL es ak ma Ot Te ots OG, 
Distribution in L. Erie—Localities 
Cedar Presque Maumee 
Point Isle River 
Piehtepirowmish Olive...) 2 oe 2s, Yas eeb pa Betas D5 Optsvar ee 
ER CiitinvgmOrtigine ws te eb WR es NS DE AOR StE A coke Din jy eee eee ae 25% 
EST itnnvan Olivieteee ce tS eee 1 Sctt Ea Aa SERINE DG ee te er Ta ae are Me 25% 
itv OWA cee 1 ope a Os Yas ae ANT, tested tee BOT te. ae es 25% 
DD ReCCOnmE RO Viieeasenees y ae <2 u® Tele Ne ees es ee D5 Os ie ie 25% 


Deductions from Tables of er ee and Pl. II. 


In this species also it is noted that the colors of the shells from 
the Upper Ohio Drainage are darker. The browns of L. Erie are 
of reddish hues, those from the Upper Ohio Drainage more blackish 
in nature. L. Erie has also a larger percentage of olive colors. 


In the Upper Ohio Drainage 

A darkening of colors from olive to brown may be traced down 
the Allegheny and in primary colors, (olive to brown), from the 
Monongahela into the Ohio. Darkening from Brown to Blackish 
is characteristic of a large part of the Ohio. Saccardos Umber 
would be a secondary color for the Allegheny; Buffy Olive for the 
Ohio. Other characteristic colors are indicated in the tables given 
above. 


In Lake Ene \ 

Here the shells possess a brownish olive not found in the shellé of 
the Maumee River which empties into it. Buffy Olive colors are 
peculiar to Cedar Point shells, while the deeper browns belong to 
Presque Isle shells. 


270 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Rays of Epidermis 
Simpson mentions no rays in this species. However 34 of 55 shells 
were found to be rayed, and rays persist at least until the 15th year. 
In this case, lake shells had coarser rays than those of the river, 
although there were a large number of fine rayed specimens in 
both. Light green was the prevailing color. 


Relation of Epidermal Color to Estimated Age of Amimal. 


The percentages of green colors tend to increase with age in 
both Upper Ohio and L. Erie, while brown, the other juvenile 
color, decreases with age. Color changes take place about the 12th- 
14th year, old age colors may appear as early as 10 years, more 
fully at 12. Blacks apparently decrease with age in the Upper 
Ohio, but this is based on fragmentary data. No color or — of 
colors seemed peculiar to any given age. 


Observation on Sex-Correlative Coloration as related to Epidermal 
Color. (5 shells). 


Males are more largely green, females brownish yellow. 


9.—Anodontoides ferussacianus 
SIMPSON RIDGEWAY 
Greenish Hellebore green; other colors: Buffy Olive 
Brownish Olive, Yellowish Olive, Deep Olive 
Isabella Color. 
Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Drainage and 
L. Erie (69 shells). 


aS TTL Wage) Mise aoe 2 ecient OEE Se ee. ee) Os, Nes Cee UR tr ets te ia iekn! 30% 
Brow hish VOlivek..o ea Rn aah te Saae DE ne ce eae 20% 
Yellowish Olive... PORE A, EY Saeki Ween ae ena Genes ee ta ar 20% 
DEep; Olivet Re. 55 wok Bor see ee eee eae Sie a al eae ee ae 20% 
OLIV C= oT Oe ee ee a gE a das se a ees ee 10% 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Drainage 
(45 shells. 


1 EST Sagal Oat 6 Gib 1 \ seen Mae AUR a S08 Barer aes Rai Ret Aaa em Lees 9k 2 30% 
BS EOMVEIIS HW OUIVEL soba ca teas Dacca Es St Starts ORR GAME oe Bw Bh eador af 08 Pen oen on Seen een 20% 
Pra trella | CORE... oxen ea See A ee es me ce 
Tellebore Greens. 22. ee 20% 
UMD TE OMNES. a ats cpm an ac ae ee ok et eI EO eee 10% 
Distribution, of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Tributaries etc. 
Alle'’ny Beaver 

Tribs. Tribs. 

Biviey Cer ine oh d Cee : Rie ei ak Ne a ee BO teens 20% 


Brawiishy Olive..30 to he a ha eae ae ae eed 2.60 Wp cua xe octeee BOYD 


| 


VARIATION IN EPIDERMAL COLOR OF NAJADES. oF 


Tae he (5) aye Sy ie tet ile enn tat RUIN ar 2 8 Seid Se Nadie eg Te 20% 
TRUSS over Cy eyes i a eee es ee a ee ee ee ab cates Retna gear 20% 
LEisaniy: (Oy bios aner  bor ol aint AE LSet Rc Rae etre Renae PI Cy (gle ae 20% 
Distribution of Colors as a Whole in L. Erie (24 shells). 
AES MeCN VERT LMS NO) [Mireeeeeee ss eeree, wee See, © ROT ee eS eek eee rene ee 309 
WirteSE tee ECO liee cores cers oie tae 2k AEE OR ed od ee 30 Yom 
DarallcnwisbeiOlnjes Verse cee 2 Una tas eee Py ary ol Pt ee sears Ta eee 20% 
CEO MO ter Ste wk FA er Bl eee Fel i eo ee ae ee 10% 
FRY eile tera re zp Say Sei a Wh eae ea I SO eet OE Sl pitti hs RAe SOF SAL 10% 


Distribution in I. Erie, with that in other localities to be- 
compared. 


i Presque Maumee Conneaut 

; Isle River Lake 
EO wiiniShOliveske. co ui nar We Ces Nas AO Ug ee ees SOU ee Se 
ies EUItihe tO Wil. 4 2 ne Ce ey een ote L DOGG hee ae ete ree 50% 
Wie ttowwyas ar leverce oe ae) A ele ee DS Of ei Toe) Nk Ne, es 
IDE OY COI NG Gi, Nae et Racial RAE. 0 ieee ee DOUp se Le eee o. 25 ae A eee 25% 
ellebore, Greene oe) eh 2 eed, rx hah PACE a as DOF es Nit eae Bee 25% 


Deductions from Tables of Percentages etc. 


Shells of L. Erie are olive or yellowish, whereas those of the 
Upper Ohio are brownish or buffy. 
‘In the Upper Ohio 

It is observed that shells become more buffy in color in the 
lower stretches of French Creek. A color change mostly toward 
_darker green colors is observed going down the Shenango. Shells 
darken from greenish colors in Padan and Pymatuning Creeks, 
to brownish colors where they enter the Shenango. Characteristic 
primary colors are Buffy Citrine in French Creek, Olive colors in 
the Shenango. As a whole the Allegheny Tribs. stand out for 
brownish colors; the Beaver for Olive, green, or yellow. 


In Lake Erie 

Presque Isle possesses colors not found in the Maumee which 
drains into L. Erie. Conneaut Lake as compared with L. Erie has 
yellowish rather than brownish epidermal! tints. 


Rays of Epidermis 
Simpson—‘‘often faintly rayed.’’ 34 of the 69 shells showed 
raying persisting at least until the 8th estimated year. Rays 
were distinctly medium in testure when compared with those of 
other species, and were most widely distributed in creeks. The 
prevailing color was Brownish Olive, and the oldest age recorded 
was 8 years. ' 


272 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Relation of Epidermal Colors to Estimated Age of Animals. 

Bluish green is most common in young shells, decreasing with 
age when the shells become brown, which may be an early as the 
4th or 5th year. Old age colors may appear completely at 6. A 
brownish deposit occurs on L. Erie shells of this and other species 
which at times is apt to confuse the observer as to the true color. 
No color or group of colors seemed peculiar to any given age. 


Observation on Sex-Correlative Coloration as associated with Epider- 
mal Color. (4 shells). 


Males—brownish or Yellowish Olive. 


Females—green. 
10.—Eurynia recta 
SIMPSON RIDGEWAY 
Black Bister T 
Olive Green Olive, Brownish Olive, Dark Greenish Olive 


Other colors noted: (browns) Warm Sepia, 
Snuff Brown, Mummy Brown. 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Drainage and 


(Cites ee a elim Re PS RP RMI AMES Pe apne Te Tee AS PANE A Le 30% 
Watt epian ich oS si 10) hc SR ee Sa eee See eee 20% 
SUAUBUEINS 5 10 11 16 0 eaeer SM a CEL EN Oye UR OE Ls wigs Math A ad ee 20% 
NEG fol eee 5 Cee eer Ce ane Me ae nRE ned Uomo eet Pema. ite OL ae SL Rie cet oe 20% 
Browilish. Olives ae) S00 oe ee a oe eka Cn ee 10% 
Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Drainage 
(33 shells). 
Mii iany PIE O WW tt te sa eon ees ee ed Ce ee ee 30% 
Oliver en Ba eee et Sige Pee > he Snes 20% 
SCTE VB Ey eis ae ea hee cee Le ny ee ee ee ee 20% 
Wiarti: Sepia. oer a el 0 ee ee ee ee 10% 
Brawatsh) Olives. Sse ee a PM al 0 a oa eae 10% 
Darki Greenish Olives 20es Sat eT ee ieee Re ee ee eee 10% 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Tributaries. 
Allegheny Allegheny Ohio Tuscarawas 


; Tribs. River River River 

Munimy (Browne Ae ee eee TOG Gs ee ee 2007. oe 
GOV ee ec aoe war SE ee eee 1 Shue Roel. a Ay es aaa 2.0 Yon eee 
Sn tril) “BOW ile cs) an ee ee AEE RO 6 Oana: Pee 2OOF: aie 
DV itn Ae 1 ee eee ek eR oe TO Ug PG pte 20 C7 cee 
Brownishe Oliv ee se Cr ee eee A AS) Seer ee D2 tee ZOO ee 50% 
Dark Greenish Ojive i ey ee 32 OB Tiki wae aa ee 50% 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in L. Erie—Localities. 
Chestawt 00 oe St ae ae eee Oe eh 220, 


VARIATION IN EPIDERMAL COLOR OF NAJADES. 23 


SUMMER IRS csc eke antes 2 ae ae eee a oe oe 20% 
Brownish Olive... wh, SEAS SOW IeY BS oa. TB Gi en CRM TAPERED (tan Uae cots 20% 
SEA Tetcd MNES Is NYC Vee ee en me Serr ne eee ne er ok LA RTS ee 20% 
Dog SUE g pee alle ede Le Gaal RG eel oil alae tea elas Rte ¢ ake Ral Mede! BAND tae emote 10% 
Peer etereciicd Olives crt lal et gy. ere a ea 10% 


Distribution of Colors in L. Erie—Localities. 
Cedar Point Presque Isle 


ROHIES Patt ee en eee Ee ae 2 ee oe ee Cea BRO ae og aes 16% 
(Cphisre, OYE) ie SANS Fear oie tat Se ee a ee Ba Oley re 33% 
TESCO TEMRS Ta QIN SUR ISI eo Milnes epic aee Bern, Aare MUU eee mee oe ere EO at sree 16% 
Raters ORES 0) Wg ee ee et ee Ie age ed Pn GO, gare es 16% 
EAA SHSIE ate WEG ce eaa raise oe Senos ern By Bre ped AT) nS Sl Ee eee ae 16% 


Deductions from Tables of Percentages, etc. 


Browns are in excess in the Upper Ohio as compared with L.— 
Erie. Olives and golden yellow hues are peculiar to L. Erie. 


In the Upper Ohio Drainage 

For a great part of the Allegheny’s course a darkening may be 
seen in the primary color from greenish to olive and brownish colors. 
The series from French Creek and the Ohio apparently do not 
conform to the general rule. More positive evidence can only be 
secured with a larger number of shells. Dark Citrine could be 
termed a characteristic primary color for the Ohio, Yellowish 
Citrine for French Creek. We may note at any rate, that the darker 
colors are more abundant in the tributaries than in the rivers and 
vice-versa, while browns are more abundant in the Ohio than in the 
Allegheny. 


In Lake Erie 


Browns are most numerous at Cedar Point, while Presque Isle 
has the larger proportions of black colors. 


Rays of Epidermis 


6 of 54 shells showed raying persisting until the 15th year. 
They were coarse in the specimens examined and appeared only 
in those from rivers. Their color was Greenish Olive, and the 
oldest age to which they persisted was 16 years. 


Relation of Epidermal Color to Estimated Age of Animals. 


Juveniles of this species are mostly green. Darkening may occur 
as early as 7 years and is complete at 14. No color or group of 
colors seems peculiar to any given age. 


274 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 
Observation on Sex-Correlative Coloration as related to Epidermal 
: Color. (45 shells). » ESE 

Males are Greenish-Olive in younger stages. Snuff Brown when 2 
old. Females are Brownish Olive when young, becoming darker 
blackish brown with age. : 

11.—Lampsilis luteola 

SIMPSON RIDGEWAY : 
Straw Colored Olive Lake $ 
Yellowish Buffy Olive 
Greenish yellow Ecru Olive 
Brown when old. Brownish Olive, Light Brownish Olive. 


Dristribution of Colors as a Whole in the Upper Ohio ‘Drainage 
and LI. Erie (289 shells). 


Browalish* Olives: 532i e Fee Se a er Ae eee es a ee ed eae 30%° 
Brera ies aoe Us Sar et wa iS yy Te OD rs neler aa eee re 20% 
Bitlet OLIVES wbe AO. eS AOR at 8 ocd iy kA oe es Oe a a 20% 
CUVEE aE sesh Soe Se TA re Re ee eee ares ae nee 20% 
BizhtVB row nishVOlives 2 4:10. ee eS coe et Ou. fi ee oy eee ere ee 10% 
_ Distribution of Colors as a Whole in the Upper Drainage (187 
shells). 1 - 
Birt PO IVe ati S00) ten Sane be eae rely) Pd SO EE | oT a 30% 
Silence! oe 205) re Paar ai re Se ee ee 20% . 
JEN aN THIS E NN Ol bh he ae Meee SECS S, SOROS SPRL © ANNE see AROS To 20% 
IEKGETE (O) Nig DS es ee ae a em Ae ater OR Cee a UNOS oe PMR Uy OBS eee 4 > 10% 
Torin cowwisia Clave he a aes ole ea 207% 7 ? 
Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Uap Ohio Tributaries ete. 
2 Alle’ny Alle’ny Monong. Monong. Ohio Beaver Beaver’ 3 
Tribs. River River Tribs. River River Tribs. 
BultysOuve.- 4.0 es: MY DRS RE Meted 25 %......25 %. 25 Yo. 50 gpa etoe s 
Olive bake eel bonr rl ay BQ EL SOU D.) O50 DOGS. tees ee eae ee 30% 
Brownish Glive Wy Fees Pi iets: ae INS OF ae, PAY mee NT ee ee 50% 1 
Berm Olivers a! oo eee ie 25 %......50 Ws 125 Yp--25 os 25 op eae 
Light Brownish Olive YB Seba dict UL elem Todo Wren SN EL ate Ula 25 Os Nee \ aoe 
Distribution of Gaiocs as a Whole in L. Erie (111 shells). . ! 
IMTS BB EOWA: nee Raa ae pI MEA Dae ieee eee eee 30% 
Olive na er ele: ey CFP ey BPE Ae 3 Ber a See i eee 20% 
Dark (Olive Baths) Poptart to oy) ee es P< aaeeyt SE eee ean 209% : 
Bitty Olives 2.5 e Mo ie Ae es) ae DSS a Or bo cl oinaee eee 20% 
Heri oOlive 2 Un es hove, ee a ee ee 10% 


Distribution of Colors in L. Erie—Localities. 


Conneaut La Plais- Presque Chau- Maumee 
Lake  sance Bay Isle tauqua L. River 


VARIATION IN EPIDERMAL COLOR IN NAJADES. 275 


ite VOlinere cist a bas ROS MOE ea OE Oy i Mee so Ae aot 
yer @ liver e rcs Serene toe ee Ea I Din Oe SE aaa ee 25 %....-.25 %p....--25%y 


Deductions from Tables of Percentages, etc. 

ly. Erie shells have greater proportions of Buffs and Yellows. 
Browns are more numerous in the Upper Ohio. 
In the. Upper Ohio Drainage 

Shells lose their green color and become more yellowish descend- 
ing the Allegheny. This is also mostly true of the French Creek, 
Crooked Creek, Shenango and Mahoning Rivers. The-distinction 
is not clear cut between the Monongahela River and its Tribs. 
but is in the case of the other rivers and their tributaries which 
~ as the tables of percentages show have yellow rather than greenish 
colors characteristic. Changes in secondary colors are also not 
well marked. This species and L. ovata do not readily darken in 
the river. Characteristic primary stream colors are Yellowish - 
Citrine for the Allegheny, Olive Lake for French Creek, Buffy 
Citrine for the Shenango, Light Brownish Olive for the Mahoning. 
In Lake Erie 

The Maumee River, (draining into L. Erie) as well as its near 
locality, La Plaisance Bay has a preponderance of buff colors. 
Presque Isle possesses more browns and olives. Chautauqua and 
Conneaut Lakes resemble Presque Isle in the distribution of color. 
| Rays of Epidermtis 

Simpson—‘‘Normally showing bright rays throughout.” 203 
of 289 shells were rayed. Fine rays were most abundant in L. Erie, 
coarser ones in the rivers, medium ones in creeks. ‘The oldest 
age to which they persisted was 24 years, although such an age 
estimated by counting the winter rings seems a little long fora 
color to persist in a mussel. Coarse rays were most abundant 
in male shells, fine in females. They. persisted in all ages of 
the animals. 


Relation of Epidermal Color to Estimated Age of Animals. 


Juveniles are Yellow or Greenish Yellow, percentages of the former 
decreasing, that of the latter increasing with age. Greenish Yellow 
is perhaps always the more abundant color. Browns and blacks 
appear as early as the estimated 1oth year in the Upper Ohio, 
and somewhat earlier in L. Erie. ‘“‘Old age’’ colors as a rule are 
not abundant in this or in the following species. No color or group 
of colors seemed peculiar to any given age. 


/ 


‘ 


276 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Observation on Sex-Correlative Coloration as Associated with Epider- 
mal C olor. (140 shells) 

Young males are yellow green with maturity becoming brownish 

green. Young females are Buffy Olive in color, with age becoming 


a greenish gold, (Olive Lake.) \ 
12—Lampsilis ovata 
SIMPSON RIDGEWAY 
Greenish Olive ochre 
Greenish yelléw Brownish Olive, Colonial Buff. 
Brownish Buffy Olive, Mars Brown, Bister, Saccardos 


Umber, Buffy Citrine, Ecru Olive. 
Distribution of Colors as a Whole in Upper Ohio Drainage and 
L. Erie (214 shells). 


Bort p@Oliver: S28. Uc Fates Se Ret AEC ds ee la ee 20% 
Baatiy Olivera = 8 a aa Sots 8 a Pee OE A oe ae et oo Sees ee 
DBecmmchvGlives -) 2. Soe. eee Meee) eee 20% 
COLO fas Ui! ess ere ie Seen Sas he pa ts Pe, ee a a 20% 
Brltiy tC resin] et se ee A NE ST Seah HOLY oa. Aed ey Ueto ee ee 20% 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in the Upper Ohio Drainage 
(188 shells). 


Bemioiy ets. 03.) Ft ee erie og OLE tee SORE eee. eae 20% 
IBatiiey,. Onivierert soc. $c mae He in ee ay 8 Ce Dip cna gd oe ie et alae 20% 
Olive SOCRTC eek oii ee ea ee ee ee ee 20% 
Ves AONE 8 ol I Re Ae epee ee Oe 20% 
552) 0S A el aie Ca RCI WAUIRER OB. cles ONE, alee esi nop Re mR IER YE Je 10% 
Naceard os gimmie Ne he aN SE SE DES TE ae Saree eee 10% 


Distribution of Colors as a Whole in the Upper Ohio Tributaries. 
Ally: All’y Ohio Ohio Beaver Beaver 
Tribs. River River Tribs. River Tribs. 


ere Olmert a soar y ees PO SCA et 25% 25 30% 2 BG OGe aoe 
Bitty Olive! Atel tak: Rien 3 26 2 25.Upe. 225 Void 20x 225 pee 
Olive Ochre............ Biter ce tenae 20%. «50 Wyk 25 Vp 20 Ye 5 one eae 
Brownisne Olive. 2.) Sie OR FN as eae ULE EN Fy OMe eae te 37% 
PSTSCet: seen: Atle be aera tee ae CH In eee ha NM PSS ML SIN Ne dah PEAS et A 12% 
Saecarwos Umber ea) Pes he Pees eh Ca asics ook ore aan 20% 2 
Distribution of Colors as a Whole in L. Erie (26 shells). 
oC olotita dk TBs > 3 eo so agp EE eas eet Se aed A eae 30% 
Baiiy: 2 OU inc eee ee eas re a han pe ee ee ee 30% 
Brows “Olver. os kote i ren ee el oe a ee 20% 
Bris Gy tines Os Ss 0 PR ee SIRE A PADRE GhE OES Te SMe ge eR 10% 
Mars tBrowini.t: att ab i bie Tine: oie De ete heen eee ee 10% 
Distribution in 1. Erie—localities, and Chautauqua Lake. 
La Plaisance Cedar Presque Chautauqua 
: Bay Point Isle Lake 
Colonial _Buff......2.... LA ny Seen, ee ee ROOD ss. ee 50 Gao SO Uji xs 


-VARIATION IN EPIDERMAL COLOR IN NAJADES. oy, 


ESeUiinvga Oe tees ee, ee Oe 2 des SG PSO a eames Die pe erg whoa st Pek 50% 
Browse Olives ess eC eT Te Ns OO Y ik une laa Anabaena hes Papo cae 2 ea 2G 
VBSB UT CG 0 See. ROE ae ee a NOt WS ane de 
RWB VAS, TESTO Nia ca Rau Oi Pane Ate S.C Mati ek eso ener resp a PNT YA EN DASE ees 
Meare wie Fs \fik eer eee nt we ek Pt Se ee Ne eee 25% 


Deductions from Tables of Percentages and Pl. IIf. 


Yellow and Yellow Green colors are prominentin L. Erie; browns 
in the Upper Ohio. * 
In the Upper Ohio Drainage 

A tendency to darken both in primary and secondary colors is 
seen descending the Allegheny—from yellowish to brownish or 
buff colors. This is the general change found also in the course 
of the Crooked and Neshannock Creeks; Ohio, Shenango and 
Mahoning Rivers. In most cases the shells of the tributaries will 
be found to have lighter colors than those of the main streams. Char- 
acteristic primary stream*colors are Olive Lake in the Allegheny, 
Isabella Color in the Ohio, Olive Ochre in the Shenango, Olive 
Yellow in the Mahoning, Buffy Citrine in the Little Beaver. 
tek. Erie : 

Yellows appear to be equally abundant at all the lake stations 
given, Hut these differ in their proportions of Buffy and Brownish 
Colors. Chautauqua Lake seems characterized by an abundance 
of the former. As was found with nacreous color, this and the last 


'named species show little variation in epidermal color. 


Rays of Epidermis 

Simpson: ‘‘Broad bright green rays, wanting in older shells.”’ 
140 of 180 shells were rayed. Coarse rays were most abundant in 
lake specimens, medium and fine rays in the rivers, with coarse 
and medium textures about equally divided in the creeks. Colors, 
yellow to dark green, with a tendency toward black in the Upper 
Ohio Drainage. Coarse and fine rays are most abundant in male 
shells; medium in female. 


Relation of Epidermal Color to Estimated Age of Animal. ° 
No juveniles were comprised in the material worked with. 
Green is most abundant in shells beneath 12 years of age. Greenish 
yellow appears to increase in older shells in both L. Erie and the 
Upper Ohio Drainages. Shells:may become brown or black as early 
as 11 years, although such colors are not abundant in either of the 


- Lampsiline shells possibly due to their more highly polished epi- 


278 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


~ 


dermis. No color or group of colors was found to be peculiar of any 
given age. 


Observation on Sex-Correlative Coloration as associated with Epider- 
mal Color. (106 shells). 


Greenish gold colors, (Olive Lake) appear to predominate in males. 


Less of green and more of brown are to be found in females. 


VI.—CoNCLUSIONS. 


1. In the species of Najades dealt with, there exists a wider 
range of variation of epidermal color than that indicated by 
standard specific descriptions. : 

2. In practically all the species dealt with, a decided change of 
epididermal color is obsirved going down stream from the head- 
waters to the mouth. The usual tendency is for the primary epider- 
mal, or ground color to darken from an Olive Green or Olive Gray 
shade to Brownish or Buffy Colors, and this darkening is true in 
part of all colors of the epidermis, whether due to inherent causes or 
to those associated more with environmental causes. Within the 
limits of the material dealt with, itis further recognized thata darken- 
ing of the epiderinis may occur with advanced maturity or oldvage, 
which is quite independent of the geographical locality, but such 
colors are always darkest in specimens from furthest down stream. 

3. The shells of L. Erie have in general lighter epidermal colors 
than those of the Upper Ohio and Maumee Drainages. Lighter 
yellows, browns and greens are more common among thein, and 
in this respect they resemble the smaller tributary streams of the 
Upper Ohio Drainage. The shells of Conneaut and Chautauqua 
Lakes have much the same relation as those of L. Erie. Other 
conclusions, not however as completely substantiated as those 
given above, but still sufficiently evident from the present data as 
to deserve mention are, 

4, Each drainage leaves its own imprint on the shells collected 
from it in the additional form of an associated or peculiar hue of 
epidermal color, as has already been shown with regard to nacreous 
and certain other physical characters of the shell. While the same 
general hue may be present in different drainages, these may be 
characteristically differentiated when necessary by the presence 
of varying proportions of other colors. 

5. Asarule, the color distinctions may be carried so far as to 


a 


VARIATION IN EPIDERMAL COLOR OF NAJADES. 279 


say tentatively at least that certain shades of epidermal color are 
characteristic even of different parts of a given locality. 

6. ‘The rays of the epidermis disappear with age and have in 
the limits of the material worked with, their widest ee 
is specimens from small rivers and creeks. 

7. With regard to the relation of epidermal color to the esti- 
mated age of the animals, it was found that no one color or group 
of colors was peculiar to a given age of the animals, except the 
yellowish or grayish colors of early youth, or the deep browns and 
blacks of old age and advanced maturity. : 

8. The epidermis of most species. shows clearly defined sex- 
correlative coloration. 


VII.—SUGGESTIONS AS TO CAUSES OF FacTs. 


Introductory rematks embody the writers comments on the 
first of these conclusions. In view of the evidence presented, the 
most plausible explanation of the second would seem to be found 
in the physical and chemical conditions under which the shells 
live. A summary of the more outstanding physical and chemical 
conditions in the Upper Ohio Drainage and L. Erie has been 
previously given. 

A physical condition which may seem closely related to the problem 
of epidermal color is the warmer temperature of the water in the 
former, for it has been shown that the shells from the Upper Ohio 
possess more pigment, pigment is the result of chemical reactions, 
and the degree of chemical reaction in general is increased by heat. 

It is readily comprehended that the problein of epidermal color is 
a more complicated one than that of nacreous color. The epidermis, 
protectory in function, is in direct contact with the environment, 
and is the recipient of all chemical and physical forces involved 
whereas the nacre, while probably the subject of all forces acting 
through solution, is probably interacted upon by relatively few 
physical forces. Ina previous paper it was shown that the ints 
of nacreous color lighten going down stream in the Upper Ohio 
Drainage, and that the nacre of L. Erie shells possesses lighter hues 
than those of the former. Suggested causes for these phenomena 
were, 

1. Presence of humic acid in the headwaters of streams, which 
with a greater amount of available light due to less amount of 
silt there, affords favorable cciditions for the production of pigment. 


280 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST . 


2. Reaction of humic acid upon the yellow or red Fe203 of the 
soil or of the water, resulting in its reduction to FeO, whence FeO 
by interaction with COz of soil water or environment becomes 
FeCO3, a whitish or yellowish compound.* It was additionallly 
pointed out that iron is a part of the composition of the mussel 
shell, and reasoning from the basis that it is known to be an im- 
portant constituent of animal and vegetable piginents, it was 
suggested that the deeper tints of nacreous color in the headwaters 
was due by some similar process to the inclusion of greater amounts 
of Fe203 in the shell, especially since the water in the tributaries 
has a greater degree of oxygenation (due to greater rapidity of the 
current), whence the transition from carbonate to ferric oxide might 
be affected. In L. Erie, the nacreous colors of shells seemed more 
closely related to the greater degree of alkalinity of the water. 

3. Further down stream, the reaction of the Humic acid upon 
the ever increasing amount of lime may produce COz2. This or 
other available CO2 may attact the iron oxides producing Fe2CO3. 
Under the conditions present, this latter compound may remain 
stable, since oxygenation, (slower current) is less, light is less due 
to increasing aimounts of silt, and organic matter is more. Now it 
is also known that organic matter at times may mask the red or 
yellow iron oxides in clay, giving the latter a bluish, greenish or 
bluish, greenish or even other colors. Provided then that Fe2CO3 
is the iron compound available downstream for mussel shells, and 
that there is a greater inclusion of organic matter at such localities, 
plausible explanation for the changes or fading out of nacreous 
color is found. 

Much of the above may be made to apply to the problem of 
epidermal color also when the following is born in mind. It has 
been shown that the change in epidermal color is opposite to that 
reported for nacreous color. Under the conditions, 2 groups of 
factors acting separately or jointly may produce such an effect, 
representing.as they do natural and unnatural environments of 
the shell. 

1. In connection with the natural group, it may be pointed out 
that the amount of silt as well as the darkening of the epidermis 
increases going down stream. Further, the mussel shell is subject 
to constant erosion from COz2 or other chemicals in the water 


*For a full discussion of Humic acid and its relation to iron compounds see 
Pirsson, L. F. and Schuchert, C. S., ‘‘A Textbook of Geology.” « 


Ee 


VARIATION IN EPIDERMAL COLOR OF NOJADES. 281 


and from the current itself, especially when the latter carries sus- 
pended matter. Darkening then might be due to the use of minute 
particles of the silt in the shell building activities of the animal or 
to their external deposition on the shell. This general proposition, 
that the silt is indirectly or indirectly responsible for the blackening 
of the shell, is borne out by the fact that in L. Erie where there is 
relatively less silt, the shells are lighter and clearer in epidermal 
colors. sit 

If we now endeavor to relate the facts stated to those seemingly 
furnishing a reasonable hypothesis for the change in nacreous 
color, we may tentatively suggest that shells are yellow or yellowish 
green upstream and in the tributaries on account of the yellow 
oxide of iron (Fe203) they may contain. Downstream the inclusion 
of greater amounts and variety of organic matter in the silt darkens 
them as organic matter darkens clay. That the degree of pigmenta- 
tion seems to depend largely on the environment colors. There 
appeared to be no regular sequence of development of epidermal ~ 
color beyond the fact that most shells are yellowish when young, 
and with age become blackish or brownish. A shell from a given 
locality may have old age colors when it is still comparatively 
young, while another locality may show shells retaining juvenile 
colors to an advanced maturity. We have also noted that shells 
darken with age in the tributaries and headwaters, that is, quite 
‘independent of their geographical locality. A fair reason is presented 
when we coinbine the time element with the factors stated above, 
and take into consideration the physical characters of the shells. 
While the water in the tributaries is swifter, erosion of the shells 
may be slowed down, for such characters as greater compression 
there, (as has been confirmed by many investigators) enable it to 
present less surface to the eroding waters, and while silt is present 
it is not in abundance and variety as is the case further down 
stream. If silt plays any part in the coloration of the epidermis, 
it is evident that a longer time will be required to affect the shell, 
and it follows, that age for age, colors will be lighter in the tribu- 
taries than further down stream. A convenient analogy here is 
that applying to the bark of certain trees. The cork will become 
black more quickly in an industrial community under the influence 
of smoke or chemicals in the air, than it will in the virgin forest, 
but ultimately it becomes black in either locality. As the shells 
were first thoroughly scrubbed before making color comparisons, 


282 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


it might be fairly assumed that any remaining coloration, making 
allowance for the possible effects of stream pollution was character- 
istic for the shell at the locality. Finally, the natural conditions 
of the Upper Ohio are also largely true of the streams draining 
into L. Erie, and similar explanations may be advanced for thé. 
shells living them. 

2. The pollution of streams by sewage and industrial wastes 
presents a most unnatural factor affecting the epiflermal color of 
shells.* While as Ortmann and Baker have independently pointed 
out, pollution from either source may be so extensive as to ulti- 
mately kill the animals, for the purposes of our problem we may 
only consider their possible relations to epidermal color. Sewage 
is largely organic matter and would seem first hand to be most 
largely concerned with the amount of silt in the stream. According 
to Prof. Earl Phelps of the U. S. Public Health Service, the in- 
dustrial wastes are largely sulfuric acid and sulfate of iron. Where 
the former chemical is present in sufficient abundance it would 
burn the organic matter, (conchiolin) of the shell black and thus 
be partly responsible for darker colors, while the sulfate of iron 
might form discoloring deposits. As it happens that the pollution 
of the water by these wastes increases going down stream, un- 
doubtedly some of the change of color indicated is due to it, at 
least in the lower stretches of the Allegheny and the Monongahela 
as conditions now stand. ‘This deposit of iron is frequently so 
tenacious as to require acid to dissolve it. 

The fact that each drainage leaves its own imprint on the shells 
collected from it is well known to experienced collectors. In wew 
of the data previously presented with regard to the great uniformity 
in epidermal color determinable at a given locality, such seems 
readily referable to peculiar stages in the development of the 
_environmental conditions outlined, Similarly, causes underlying 
conclusion 5 may be sought for. The rays of the epidermis may 
disappear with age on account of the darkening of the epidermis 
due to the causes suggested. The rays have their widest distribution 
in small rivers and creeks, where of course, silt is not in its greatest 
variety and abundance. ‘The conclusion as stated that age has no 
relation to a regular sequence of epidermal color change somewhat 
bears out the opinion ventured concerning the greater effect of the 


* The localities from which my material was collected gave evidence of 
pollution at the time, and a large number of them are now completely barren. 


© shee Pe” | eel 


w= =~ es ve” 


— aI. Se 


a ee a a 


. VARIATION IN EPIDERMAL COLOR IN NAJADES. 283 


environment in determining what the epidermal color shall be. 
In the case of brighter hues of nacreous colors in females, such a 
finding with regard to the epidermal color may also be safely re- 
garded as a “‘metabolic accident.” 


VIII.—RELATIVE VARIATION IN EPIDERMAL COLOR IN 
SPECIES DEALT WITH. 


The shells were so unevenly distributed with regard to localities 
that it was impossible to determine those places where the great- 
est ajnount of variation in epidermal color took place. Some idea 
may be obtained from Pl. III, when such is studied from the stand- 
point of any great body of water as a whole. In an effort to make a 
partially balanced determination of the relative variability of 
epidermal color among them, a rough and arbitrary comparison 
was taken by dividing the number of ‘“‘relative colors’’ observed 
in each shell by the number of that species examined. From 
this data, it seems that within’ the limits of this investi- 
gation that the larger number of shells is apparently associated 
with less variation in epidermal color. At the same time the results 
are hardly fair for those species represented by a small number of 
specimens. Results from this method show the relative varia- 
bility of the shells to be as indicated in the following table. The 
small numerals following the name of each species indicate its 
order in range of variation of nacreous color similarly determined. 
(4). and from it a convenient comparison of the relative variability 
of epidermis and nacre may be taken. 


Species No. Relative Colors taken No. of Shells  Facior Calculaied. 
1. Kurynia recta (1) 45 54 83 
2. Proptera alata (2) 42 55 .76 
3. Anodont. ferussacianus (6) 45 69 .65 
4. Paraptera fragilis (3) 33 58 56 
5. Anodonta grandis (7) 54 ' 119 3 
6. Symphynota costata (11) 31 6a55e 41 
7. Lampsilis ovata (9) 62 214 .28 
8. Amblema plicata (5) 59 185 127 
g. P. obliquum coccin. (4) 59 263 22 
10. Lampsilis luteola (12) 63 289 21 
11. Fusconaja flava (8) 42 275 ST 
12. Elliptio dilatatus (10) 65 561° a1 


If, in view of difficulties the reader will comprehend were en- 
countered in organizing this type of data, 2, (or in some cases 3) + 
ranks in the above table on Relative Variation of Color is allowed 


- 


' 284 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


for inaccuracy of color determination, it will be seen that variability. 
in epidermal color is closely associated with that of nacreous color. 


; SOURCES OF ERROR. ° 


The Ridgeway Color Nomenclature was used with careful con- 
sideration of the directions given in it. It may well be urged that 
the sense of color is so varied in its development among humanity 
that results of this kind may not have the same significance for all 
interested in such problems. But the same criticisin could be applied 
to the ornithologist who uses the Nomenclature continually. The 
writers confidence in his own observations is largely based on the 
fact that U. S. Army Tests have shown his vision to be normal in 
every way. A 

It is also true that at times, the mussels migrate from place to 
place in the same stream, and probably from the rivers into the 
tributaries. Where a small number of shells were used in making 
comparisons this might have some effect on the results obtained, 
but as the evidence of most observers is that migration is com- 
paratively rare among them, this can hardly have any effect on-the 
general impressions this paper hopes to convey, indeed, they might 
be held to account for discrepancies which will be observed here 
and there. Finally, pollution of streams by sewage, industrial 
waste, erosion by gravel and water etc., may be so extensive as to 
produce a color in some cases thoroughly unnatural to the animal. 
A check which covered most of these cases was the primary color 
taken which part being usually buried in the mud, would be more 
immune to such influences, and apt to show its truest tints. 


Washington and Jefferson College, 
Washington, Pa. 


1. Grier, N. M. ‘‘Morphological Features of Certain Mussel Shells of 
L. Erie Compared with Corresponding Ones of the Upper Drainage.’’ Annals 
Carnegie Museum, 1920. 

2. Ibid. ‘‘On the Erosion and Thickness of the Shells of the Fresh Water 
Mussels.” Nautilus, 1920. 

3. Ibid. ‘‘Sexual Dimorphism and Some of its Correlations in the Shells 
of Certain Species of Najades.’”’ Amer. Mid. Nat. Vol. 6, 1920. p. 165. 

4. Ibid. ‘Variation in Nacreous Color of Certain Species of Najades 
Inhabiting the Upper Ohio Drainage and their Corresponding Ones in L. 
Erie.’”?” Amer. Mid. Nat. 1920. . 


/ 


ea ee 


VARIATION IN EPIDERMAL COLOR IN NAJADES. 285 


5. Hey, W. C. ‘‘Fresh Water Mussels in the Ouse and Foss.” Journ. 
Conch. Vol. 3, No. 9, 1882. 


6. Huber, L. von. ‘‘Zur Naturgeschichted. Unionen.’’ Jahrbuch des 
Naturhistorischen Landes Museum V. Karnthen. Heft. 10, p. 155-57 1870. 


7. Israel, W. von. ‘‘Die Najadeen des Weidgebietes.’’ Beilage z. Nach- 
richsblatt d. Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft. No. 4, 1910, p. 4. 


8. Jennings, O. E. “A Botanical Survey of Presque Isle, Erie Co., Pa.’’- 
Annals Carnegie Museum, Vol. 5, 1909. 

g. Marshall, W. B. ‘‘Beaks of Unionidae Inhabiting the Vicinity of 
Albany N. Y.” Bull. N. Y. State Museum Nat. History, Vol. 2, No. 9. 

ro. Ortmann, A. E. ‘‘The Alleghenian Divide and its Influence upon 
the Fresh Water Fauna.’’ Proc. Amer. Philos. Society, Vol. LII. no. 210. p. 
275 301, -309, 312, 351; 353. ; 

11. Ibid. ‘‘Notes upon the Family and Genera of Najades.’’ Annals 
Carnegie Museum VIII, 1912. 


12. Ibid. ‘‘The Najades or Fresh Water Mussels of the Upper Tennessee 
Drainage with Notes on Synonomy and Distribution.’’ Proc. Amer. Philos. 
soc. Vol. 57,. 1918. . 
Mem. Car. Musem 


” 


13. Ibid. ‘‘ Monograph of Najades of Pennsylvania. 
Ve 1Ort..- VII To19, 

14. Ridgeway, Robt. ‘‘The Color Standards and Color Nomenclature.”’ 
Published by Mrs. J. Evelyn Ridgeway, 3447 Oakwood Terrace, N. W. 
Washington, D. C. 1914. 53 Pl. 1115 named colors. 


” 


15. Sell, H. von. ‘‘Biologische Beobachtungen an Najadeen.’’ Kopen- 
hagen. Archiv. f. Hydrobiologie und Planktonkunde, 1907-08. p. 129-188. ° 
16. Simpson, C.T. ‘‘On the Mississippi Valley Unionidae Found in the 
St. Lawrence and Atlantic Drainage Areas.’’ Amer. Nat. Vol. 30, p. 379, 
1896. 

“17. Ibid. ‘A Descriptive Catalogue of the Najades.’’ Published by 
B. Walker, Detroit. 

18. Walker, B. ‘“The Unione Fauna of the Great Lakes.’’ Nautilus, 

Mol.277; c 


- 


286 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Observations on Some Marine Plants of the lowa Devonian, with 
Descriptions of New Genera and Species. 


BY CLEMENT L. WEBSTER, M. SC. 


INTRODUCTION. 


In most divisions of the rocks of the Iowa Devonian, there occur 
at certain horizons from a few to great numbers of fossil marin®€ 
plants, nearly all of them apparently referable to the “‘seaweeds.”’ 
But little attention has thus far been paid to these most interesting 
forms of ancient plant life by the workers in this field, and but 
little reference to them has so far appeared in the literature of 
Iowa Devonian geology. 

So far as certainly known, not a single species of any of these 
plant forms occurring in the lower and middle Devonian of Iowa, 
appears in the upper Devonian or Hackberry group. In all these 
divisions varigus species of this or other class of plant life occur, 
and sometimes the strata are crowded with their fossil remains. 
One of these localities of special interest is that at Bloody Run in 
. Floyd County, where several genera and species occur in the rocks 
of the middle Devonian. Another horizon especially rich in these 
remains is that of the lower beds of the Upper Devonian or Hack- 
berry group, where certain strata are crowded with them. 

A critical study of these forms as they occur in the rocks of this 
age in Iowa, reveals much of special interest as certain of the ancient 
conditions existing at that time are revealed. A quite exhaustive 
study of these forms has for many years been conducted by me, and 
the results to be published in the form of a well illustrated report on 
them. But few if any of the forms found in the Iowa Devonian are 
with certainty known to occur in rocks elsewhere outside this region, 
and which adds great interest to this subject. 


MARINE FossiL PLANTS. 
Genus ZEARAMOSUS. N. Gen. 


Fossil sea plants or sea weeds, attaining a medium to quite 


large size; main plant occurring in quite large rounded dense 


bunches or clusters with short rounded heavy succulent stems more 
or less bifurcating. From this plant springs a peculiar long and 
heavy compound central stalk resembling somewhat in general 


Se + - > 


REPORT ON THE UNIOND& OF ST. JOSEPH RIVER. 287 


structure and appearance a ‘“‘bunch’”’ of celery; character of the 
termination of the middle portion of this central compound stalk 
is unknown having been broken away, but surrounding this central 
portion and springing from the base, are two or more heavy rounded 
succulent stalks 3!4—-5 inches or more in length terminated by 
3-4 large heavy elongated lobes giving to the same a unique appear- 
ance. : 


- 


Zearamosus elleria. N. Sp. on 


This species is based upon the new Genus Zearamosus, of this 

paper, which is perhaps a sufficient description of the species. 
It is gregarious in habit. This species covers the upper surface of a 
1-2 inch bed of hard limestone low down in the stratum at Bloody 
Run, Iowa, three miles southeast from Charles City. ‘There is 
considerable doubt as to just what sort of a sea plant or sea weed 
this may have been, as it appears to stand alone as to its peculiar 
form and structure. In this same stratum, both above and below 
this interesting horizon, great numbers of ‘‘fucoids’’ sometimes 
occur. i : 

This species is named in honor of Mrs. Ella E. Webster, who is 
the discoverer of this unique plant form. 

Now in the author’s collection. 

Buthotrephis thomasia. N. Sp. s 

Fossil plant composed of thick succulent stems springing from 
a common “root’’; stems branching; branches divergent; bi- 
furcating; from about half an inch to three-fourths inch in height; 
growing singly, or in dense bunches three to four inches in diameter, 
and often in places covering the surface of a certain thin bed of hard 
limestone. 

Position and locality: Central portion of the middle Devonian 
(“Cedar Valley’) at St. Ansger, West Mitchell, Osage,» Charles 
City, etc., in north-central Iowa. This is a prominent and really 
~ remarkable species of sea weed in the rocks. This species is named 
in honor of Mr. A. O. Thomas, Professor of Geology in the Iowa 
State University. 

Now in the author’s collection. 


288 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 


Genus GRACILERECTUS. N. Gen. 


Fossil sea plants or seaweeds, attaining a small to medium size; 
stems simple, succulent, cylindrical or sometimes compressed; 
broadly or sharply curved, but sometimes straight; g«nerally 
distantly branched, branches sometimes opposite; surface smooth 
or at times irregular; terminations sharp to rounded; root of medium 


size, flattened or subcircular, generally constricted above, surface 


smooth or marked by elongated elevations. 


Gracilerectus Hackberryensis. N. Sp. 


Stem of this seaweed simple, surface nearly even, cylindrical 
or sometimes compressed, surface smooth so far as known; broadly 
curved; distantly branched, branches sometimes opposite. ‘Ter- 
minations round to pointed. Diameter 1-4 to 3-4 inch; length 
apparently six inches to two feet or more. 

This fossil, in its usual aspect, presents the appearance of nu- 
merous linea stems, often extending half a foot to two feet or more 
in length, and always appears in the form of casts. 

Position and locality: Often crowding the strata of the lower 
portion of the Lower Hackberry Group (the lower part of Fenton’s 
‘““Cerrogordo Sub-stage’’; at Mason City, Iowa, and other points. 
So far as known this species is restricted to the Hackberry Group. 

Now in the author’s collection. 


Genus FRUTICRISTATUM. N. Gen. 


Stems of this seaweed rounded, not known to attain a greater 
diameter than one fourth inch or slightly more, stems terminated 
by a tuft of long, rounded succulent branches equal in diameter 
to the main stem, and these branches sometimes bifurcate; surface 
of main stem smooth, usually straight but somet‘mes bent. 


Fruticristatum iowense. N. Sp. 


Stems of this remarkable seaweed or ‘‘fucoid,’’ round, three- 
sixteenths to one-fourth inch or slightly more in diameter, three 
and a half to four or more inches in length. Stem terminated by a 
tuft of long, rounded succulent branches equal in diameter to the 
main stem. These branches sometimes bifurcate. Main stem 
smooth, usually straight but sometimes bent. 

The large slab of limestone before me-and whose upper face is 


road 


’ - , 
ae i ee ee a ve 


OBSERVATIONS ON SOME WARINE HLAFTS 289 


crowded with this really strange form, is so massed as to make a 
description of the species especially difficult, and may be somewhat 
modified when isolated forms are procured enabling this to be done. 
I know of no other fossil marine plant approaching this in form or 
general appearance. 

Position and locality: Covering the surface of a certain bed of 
hard limestone below the two nodular Stromatopora beds of the 
upper part of the middle Devonian (‘‘Cedar Valley’’), at Bloody 
Run, Floyd County, Iowa, and so far as known restricted to this 
horizon and locality. 

Now in the author’s collection. 


Fruticristatum noraense. N. Sp. at 


Stem of this seaweed or ‘“‘fucoid’’ small and slender; circular; 
broadly to sharply curved or bent; solitary; gradually and grace- 
fully tapering from the base; termination sharp to rounded; 
generally from one-eighth to one-fourth inch in diameter near the 
base; varying in length from ne and one half to six inches; surface 
apparently smooth; known only in the form of casts. 

Position and locality: Occurs in considerable numbers in narrow 
bands of crinoidal limestone at Nora Springs, Bumgardner’s quarry, 
at Rock Grove, at John Turner’s quarry, Rockford, and other 
localities in the north-central part of Iowa, in the central part of the 
middle Devonian. 2 

Now in the author’s collection. 


Fruticristatum pervetus. N. Sp. 


Stem compressed to sub-circular; strong and robust; quite 
strongly curved; surface uneven, and not otherwise marked; 
length unknown but apparently attaining six to eight inches; 
sending out strong lateral branches at intervals of an iach and a 
half; diameter six-eighth to three-fourths inch; root medium 
large, flattened or sub-circular, smooth or marked by elongated 
elevations, sharply constricted above; known only in the form of 
casts. 
Position and locality: Found associated almost everywhere with 
F. noraese, and is quite abundant. 

Now in the author’s collection. 


290 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST E Pais Pie 


Birds Observed at Brookland, D. C. from Aug. 19'to Sept. 7, 1920. 


BY BROTHER ALPHONSUS, C. S. C. 


When was About When was aes did it Byte Was it 
as 


NAME OF BIRD it first how it next ecome REMARKS 
seen? many? seen? common? seen? 

Blackbird, Red-winged No Records 
Bluebird Aug. 20 5 Aug. 2t Aug. 20 Sept. 5 Eight Records 
Bobolink Aug. 25 1 Aug. 26 Sept. 7 Seven records 
Cardinal Aug. 20 3- Aug. 21 -Aug. 20 Sept. 7 Sixteen records 
Catbird Aug. 20 1 Aug. 21 Aug. 20 Sept. 7 Fourteen records 
Chickadee Aug. 22 1 Aug. 25 Aug..25 Sept. 7 Seven records 
Cowbird No records 
Crow Aug. 20 4 Aug. 21 Aug. 20” Sépt.i 6 Thirteen records 
Cuckoo, Yellow-billed Aug. 27 1 Aug. 31 Sept.i 2 Three records 
Cuckoo, Black-billed No records 
Flicker Aug. 24 1 Aug. 25 Aug. 28 Sept. 6 Eleven records 
Flycatcher, Acadian No records 
Flycatcher, Crested Aug. 29 1 Sept. 2 Sept. 2 Two records 
Flycatcher, Least No records 
Flycatcher, Yellow-bellied -.No records 
Gnatcatcher No records 
Goldfinch ANT 2ES Oe ALES 7 Sept. 1 Six records 
Grackle, Purple Aug. 20 3 Aug. 21 Aug. 20 Sept. 6 Thirteen records 
srosbeak, Rose-breasted No records 
Hummingbird No records 
Jay, Blue Aug. 19 3 Aug. 20 Aug. 19 Sept.’ 7 Eighteen records 
Kingbird Aug. 22 1 Sept. 2 Sept. 2 Two records 
Martin, Purple Aug: 22° x Ag. “23 Aug. 2 Three records 
Meadowlark Aug. 20 3 Aug. 21 Aug. 22 Sept. 6 Five records 
Mockingbird Sept. 2 4 B One record 
Nighthawk @ No records 
Nuthatch, White-breasted Aug. 2 t Aug. 22 Aug. 23- Sept. 5 Nine records 
Oriole, Baltimore Aug. 21-2 Auge Aug. 27 Four records — 
Oriole, Orchard 3 No 1ecords 
Ovenbird Aug.*24 1 Ang ces Sept. 5 Five records 
Pewee, Wood Aug. 19. 3 Aug. 20 Aug. 19 Sept. 7. Eighteen records 
Phoebe Aug. 27 1 One record 
Redstart Aug: ro) -a. “Aziz. 2 Aug. 25 Sept. 6 Five records - 
Robin Aug. 19 3 Aug. 20 Aug. rg Sept. 6 Seventeen records 
Shrike, Loggerhead No records 
Sparrow, Chipping Aug. 22 3 Aug. 26 Aug. 26 Two records 
Sparrow, Field Aug..22 1 Aug. 27 Aug: 27 Two records 
Sparrow, Grasshopper Wo records 
Sparrow, Savanna No records 
Sparrow, Song Aug. 22 1 Aug. 22 Aug. 22 Sept. 5 Seven records 
Sparrow, Vesper No records 
Starling No records 
Swallow, Eaves Aug. 21 1 Aug. 22 Sept. 4 Four records 
Swift, Chimney Aug. 23° 4 Aug. 28 Sept.,1 Four records ” 
Tanager, Scarlet No records 
Thrasher, Brown Aug. 2t 1 Aug. 22 Sept. 3 Eight records 
Thrush, Wood Aug. 27. 3. Aug. 27 Aug. 31 Sept. 6 Five records 
‘Titmouse, Tufted Aug. 26 1 Aug. 31 Aug. 31 Sept. 5 Four records 
‘Towhee Aug. 21 1 Aug. 24 Aug. 2 Sept. 7 Ten records 
Vulture, Turkey t Fifteen records 
Vireo, Philadelphia Aug. 31) 1 One record 
Vireo, Red-eyed Aug. 20 6 Aug. 21 Aug. 20 Sept. 6 Fourteen records 
Vireo, Warbling No records 
Vireo, Yellow-throated Aug. 20 4 Aug. 21 Sept. 1 Six records 
Warbler,Blackthroated Green * No records 
Warbler, Canadian Aug. 31 1 One record 
Warbler, Connecticut Sept rics One record ¢ 
Warbler, Magnolia Septy 32 Sept. 4 Sept. 5 Four records 
Warbler, Black and White Aug. 24 1 Aug. 25 Aug. 31 ‘Three records 
Warbler, Pine Aug. 24 1 Aug. 25 Aug. 25 Sept. 3 “Three records 
Warbler, Yellow No records 2 : 
Waxwing, Cedar No records 
Whip-poor-will No records 
Woodpecker, Doway Aug. 21. 1 Aug. 25 Sept. 6 Five records 
Woodpecker, Hairy Aug. 27 . 1. Septs-2 Sept. 6 Three records 
Woodpecker, Red-headed Aug. 22 3 Aug. 26 Sept. 7 Eleven records 
Wren, House Aug. 20 1 Aug. 21 Aug. 21 Sepe. 2 Seven records 
Wren, Carolina No records 
Yellowthroat, Maryland Sept. 2 1 Sept. 32 Sept. 3 Two records 
Dove, Mourning > Several records 
Hawk, Sparrow Sept. Ws. ex One record 


INDEX 


PACE Vic see = Serge +e eee i ee 80 
MdSOLption. SElECh =. tt 159 
Aci platlaiisns, ce eee 162 
IBASOPUILOUG 8 es STR 
INCAS EIOTIG fot ke rest tie eM TRESS 163 
SULIT ada yes =. een Re 163 
PMO TOMEOKOM Ss. 2. 18 SE eer 207 
Mahamavelantss ©. «oo os eey LH 
JAN Go (2s SS ene ee i Rat Oh SP gk 79 
LSUG IDEM teed Ih (eae Seen rete ONE 128 


Basophilous adsorption... .-....... 159 
BaCtehia TON eps se See ee 161 
Bacteria adsorption.__.____4__--_--.-- 161 
1B 7ax6 lO) cece Wao ene oy MENS Se ca, hee a 122 
Teles SA VEO 20 eee ale aan enee ote RE AG 126 
: Sete) rite iS ia ilar nN i I 


1650510675; 09,, 103, 145; 


TAQ, 177, 208, 245, -290 

BMS LES ts Ofc eee ha ee etme ese e 98 
© 2 3 hANG Eyer on ena ita di esse aaieier fh DM 103 
Birds, November: 145 
IDeCE miei sree eee eee 149 

BGok Review... =.2-<.-.: 29, 245 
Biachuypiry lia: - seen es Elen 4I 
IBAMteniHiesk. 2. eee | 13 
‘ (Cabbage. mae 32 1 fs 14 
Clovesisulp. 2s he ee 13 
Mionmarchis: '. camer fo ae 13 
Mourning: Cloakeis)- ers 
Rotike-ob- =. eer A 14 
BirialowVioth:. Tee "| ee 120 
Buthotrephis Thomasia, n. s....__.. 287 
e ipilla Se 5 ERI np Pa 94 
Cabbage Butterfly. 13 
Case Making Moth 119 
Cardiophyllum 206 
Cerro Gordo Substage --183 
Chaimaemtorus..... Ae 2205, 
Chipping Sparrow. a pe: 


Chicory, Variation in... 0.6. 148 
Mlowets, 260 tee eee 149 
Tnyolicre: Soi ase 149 

Clover Sulp Butterfly 13 

Comimutata: =. 28 a oto eee Sa 61 

Cosnillat oo" Coc u oe ee Renee 207 

@nspidatear = so +2775 eee Manan 92 

(Giurtisetosa 2 4. a el ee 35 

Gricket; "Hiouse= "> ats ener nee 117 

DIALOG: 0% ee ae eee 162 

Devonian; lowa:-2'.. see esG 

Wecember Birds 1 as eee 149 

Whrhart, Genera of. 2202. “306 
Cardiophry lice ee 206 
Cornillase 5 Ss Sor oe eee 207 
Chaniaemorus] = 2S. Se 205 
FICC CO nia s ee ae ete rey 206 
LY POPIEV Si Se oe 2s ee 205 
elleporine. =o = seas 204 
Hy arophila: sey os 3 eee 203 
IGeUCOCOMA: 25.5 te eee 202 
DAH OS =e aL See 203 
IMStISCIS = ee dese see 203 
Monanthitint.- 23 206 
Phalocepholum. 22. ee 201 
Practi¢olas coi sera reer ree os 203 
Sty photrhiza 2 ee ee 204 
‘Tiphopetont2 2S eee 203 
‘Enichophylhttm: 2 ss eee 204 

Bntomostracases 5 ste eres 128 


Epidermal Colom vats. see 


Bield’ Spatrow:.-.:.-. 5. ae 54 
12) hin aed Cb Glee ee ee es ee III 
Bilig Pars elon 2 See re. aaa eee 20 

Noth? Dake. 5°. 5 sa riia eae 29 
Please. beta eet see ee ron 123 
Hlowers, Chicory <_< sso a 148 


4 


INDEX 
ing catchers ee So oe as FOr” SUCAStA se oe i Se eee ee 80 
TaN Ko (23 Padget ok Ny ark Mie a ARRAS pier 79. bakes rie Plankton. 142 
PCAC AL ee te Me eee Sag. TL ieereie i ee ne ee ie ae 122 
- LSS eh al SS a ea detie eae ea 70k Lanell (Dr. Joel 22s) Se ae eae 243 
i ECs] 0} 6 (6 ROR ee ae ge aE Soe 7. Avencocoma:: <1. Ieee ee 202 
GAS tas @ teeemenee nde 8 VEL Aedes SOL mnasewG ee el Wee Pv ae 203 
IPOD er: eet ee Oe eee 78 
Wood a $2.9 Maricens? 250 1! 203 
Vellow-bellied 80”. Marine Plants... os 286 
sie oso EN os eee 7S. +: Mangess laliaiin.- Ye ets 153 
Fossil, Plants Marine ee See eee 286 Metachromosia Wa Sth eR Ld. he oes Oe ree 160 
Fox Sparrow Sn eee 56 -Mexicana Mrubl ot eee 22 
Brutienstatum, mi. ‘gy 202 288 Mirage; (Prainie:... > eee eee 172 
TOWense S28 fe 288 Mourning Cloaks... 5 
WNordense, 118 62g ee sia 289° Monarchs... 2 20) 6 ee 13 
Pervetus, IES WS Soe cena re gees 289 Mosquitoes Sih 2 NG Ps, ee ae 113 
Moths: 527-25" eee ee LUO. an 
ereilodtal.. aire ee 63. ,Mionaathinin 2 ee eee _.206 
isoillora “ent tt ee ess be dighlenbergial.“ = “"9-" = ae 17 
Grasshopper, Sparrow.....-........-..--- 56 
CGraeierectus;-n. ge Se 283" -siNajadeste + = Sve eee eines 165 
Sex Din. 2 2 ie eee 165 
IIa GKDeGErVyensis; Te. Sise se 288 Naiades. eens ay 
Hackberry Stage. 180. Nacreous Color var... 2A 
North: Dakotatiloras. sees eee 29 
Nests; Birds 23. 2 ont See 177 
Insects n-ne een 13,111 November Birds, 2-0 145 
Batteriites: 22) te ete: 13 INiGraense dh sa ee e ee 289 
Clovercoulp x sy eS 13 
Sela, ings | a TE Go Rae "4 Owen Substage.... 2 Nee eee 186 
ERR TOMAR Cr wo 13 Obitilatry: <2 Oe ee 243 
Mourning Cloaks._--____-...... 15 
Route of... RSPR Cs iaite 1S Panicum: Lineare ee 49 
Household & Remedies._...........!111 Plant Gueyey.<. See. oe eee 29 
i 18: ' Plankton 204.02 ee ee ee 142 
Bedbug. — Laketitie.c... eee 142 
Beetle, Ham. 126 Sandusky Bay. 33-2 143 
Cricket, House. aay, Plants, <Alabama...2 27 eee 151 
Fleas Se CR ae Te AT 123°) -Pervetus, 4. Ss... See ee 289 
| fy TT aS Ae SS i ee 122, 125" pLoahe. ee +... rn ee 78 
Mosquitos... --------------------- 113 Phalocephaltnms-.. 2 ee 201 
Moth... LEO te TET ea nists 19 
Roaches bar aaa Pre Ie ae eee 116 Capillare.2- 2) ne ee ee 94 
“herimittes starts ee 125 Deewana ek 94 
Weevil nent fa) Polystachya, Muhl...__=2=_..-..91, 22 
Prairie; Mitage =... ee 72 
TIA D1 Cie ee a, ee De es "9.. Practicolac-...2965—..2eeeeee ee 203 


“s , IND? X 
TP SWe (SATA OSES an lee er ee eee AGE aaa pestiive Mn this ec ascent 20 
CLES ch pe a ae ee ba TPG oe etl uae aie ee tea 142 
bNe teresa eee wae PLE hae Sect ee 125 
Sandusky Bay Plankton_............ --143 Tiphogeton ak ae eee ae 205 
Sexual Dim. Najades._..............--.-- 165 LOTTCY 4 --nneenn nnn 84 
Selective Adsorption_............._-..--- 159 Eres PBI 
>... eae ae ‘ichoph yltwar 2.2210 ee eee 204 
a 35 Vesper Sparrow tie) ee 53 
Raireiinitmceeen se ran ee etn ee Sele yooh Ba 
Chipping Sa eMeewih Beau. >) Tk ee Pee 127 
10 lS a ie Oo ee ee 56 ‘«Waterfowl in Neb.’”’ Book Rev. 245 
ORS 18) 0] 0) eRe er 56 White Throated Sparrow... 55 
S(Ovi eo ee, Se eA Re, eee Sued sme, Wibite Crowned) 2s ers ee 56 
WESTER a Sal YE Saee Wood Pewee. 2 = oe eae 
Witte “chroateds. = eas 55 
Wihite\Grownedss2- 2 e522 56 Yellow Bellied Sparrow._.__...........- 80 
Meer as fe PM Be eT ees 55, 148 
Silver Hish sVieth 2... es 120 wZearamosus, Ng. 2 eee 286 
DUWMMOnMMRZ A= tek tee 204 Bilerias n., stn) See ee 287 


= bh cn al eg rl iiehahlehklehe ehertrc 


NOTE 


Contributions on general and midland natural 
history will be gladly received. Papers on botany 
and allied subjects, zoology, geology and physical 
geography, should be addressed to the editor. 

Matters relating to advertisements are to be 
taken up with the secretary of the University. 


| 
e 
One hundred reprints of articles averaging wl 
eight pages or more will be furnished free of charge ie 
to contributors. More than one hundred separates can : 
be obtained at cost price of the extras. When articles 
consist of less than eight pages, a certain number 
of copies of THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST in a 
which the paper appeared will be supplied free, or 
the separate articles may, by arrangement with the is 
editor, be kept until future papers average eight pages, a 
provided. the contributions are sent in for the next a 
consecutive issue for publication. Contributors of us 
articles will receive a free subscription for the year a 
in which their paper appears. For: further or other us 
information address a 
THE Epiror, Notre Dame, Indiana. 


tH 
i 
i 
in 
uF 


a 


oil 
in 
a 
1 SRSA SNe Srl one ro ean a oT eT STS TIA Sri ioTo o or ores Tororo Srloeieo Mian ny 


ue 


Fern Sr SRSA SORE SSN on aor) SO TSM en oreo ore Seo eT Deo TORT oR eT oRlerTS 


F FAAS 


Che 
Gniversity of Notre Dame 


NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


College of Arts and Letters. 


Departments of Ancient Classics, 


College of Engineering. 


Departments of Civil Engineering, 


Modern Literature, History, Mechanical Engineering, 
Political Economy, Sociology, Electrical Engineering, Chemical 
Domestic Commerce, Foreign Engineering, Mining Engineering, 
Commerce, Journalism, Library Industrial Engineering. 
Science. 

College of Science. 
Departments of Chemistry, . College of Lato. 
Physics, Biology, Pharmacy, 
Agriculture. Colle e of Sine Arts. 


College of Architecture. 


Departments of 
Design. 


Construction, 


Preparatory School. 


Variant Courses. 


Departments of Artistic Drawing, 
Painting, Cartooning, Instrumental 
Music, Vocal Music. 


St. Edward Hall. 


For Young Boys. 


Notre Dame is recognized by all educators, by the press and 
by the public as a college whose work is of the same grade as 
that of the most highly endowed colleges or the best state univ- 
sities. Its atmosphere is strongly Catholic and no young man who 
has ever attended the University of Notre Dame can escape its 
influence in after life. 


The discipline is paternal, and aims at giving young men the 
fullest liberty consistent with earnest study and manly Christian 
character. Rooms at reasonable rates. Catalogue sent on 


application. 
Address: 
DAE RE Gis RAs 


NOTRE DAME, INDIANA 


: 
| 


corr a 


252525252525 25e25e5e25e25e25 sg eS ee eee 


Sein aaa ald aaa. r 
S - . 


Thy hater i 
PAs a 


a. be 
ny 
“A = 


led a 
«cue =A, on. 


rie . 
I Miha, st 


tole be bien we RAAF RG IAA I. 
ack saan anata nea 
a ai) goo” abi {te or: iat te if 


7 a ‘ay, 
& 
Hen Anu snang ARs 


~ 


Miata, 


~~ 
vi “AAT isngs tla” Aa 
nn VY fade’, “\ 
apchheg ‘ 1 ay 
ranma Nig, S bil Y 
Sareea « Ar, i ” 


* ha 7 ™ TR Aa es SARA Aa a7 ae 3 Sets yy ’, A, a a ! Pe Rag 

Hin, eeric\ ty a f Ay Near ae Ohh, a4 Sates } ran 

a | ry a era a WT Lal | 

AN xs 14 Ra as - ae" RT| elie i rortiine “ays yAtaas gata Bes 4644), 
Nai, PP RRRO TTT | LO ise i hb j fii, Pa as, 

AA tala Lo A, Rese 4 

Naya, aot 
- .Aagpreae aA tt a -_ 9 . Wp 


aA “X01 | { ‘ 
“89 1 TTA ene Waa 
- 3 4 Ig 
TA a - Obs THT Lu 
wai aN ane CCuMAMAC Maes Ta Meaty : 
NN mae! | | ii) THTTTI VT Te PRET 
Speedie, oe pase \ AA 
1h Mel (aa | apAp t ° 
Bay a] Prva, 4 aha be ee 
seek, oa @anene sbesl AD NINL Lage edt Beep aeeh 
Sm aie hs, 22 i TTT BRA ane peers A) Ae Le oF SA Py, 
Ae TY ad ie am PrVolnin) YN PP RA Mana Me Ae Pre, 
“Ady, oR oo wal Dania =t 2 VL TET Ania. a, 
\a N Te EEPYSY | a7 Anshan, — OONS name we OO ape LA beg 2. e. ahaha. aa mat ean 


E ary ™ oro er ae Lae a EAS | 


Wan . N oe Z yn 7 ~= : 
Ltt abnaline N tnteroshs 
Pye MMOLE LAL wets auparee ne n 

9 : “Qana || Laas TL - AA | ~~ Laan a 


Aig wes Rant SOR VIaNerty Sia beth Gectrenaa.e lt 
pr WATT Lees > Be. 


* 
ce 2* 


RA ABABA an ~ 
Gay ng =m 5 aS ni a,_ w z Rite Bf & BR fie : >, a r_ £ 
a wy y a + GP eg ge ans et (= ; Ne 3 ' hia 
( Wiis: AA par ad AN ee wf A iy m™ 9g te <7*5 = 3 tore ay 


war? 


| Ve Te , & i cr 
spPan ashe rrr” Dee emote TCT THLE 


aananan- ph ; eS | 

A Onoe: _o he “y nmet WAAR ALR, | PG! Bans Pes 
Nay AOR pphaha ral % | mets ta,’« A “~, NN 

aes AWAY DL AE YO ihe : gras -- | bie 

Ary | PUTPEETELT Fe (Sox | apAp) *e 

a ere NS wn Pasa Leal 

tf See eee ssaanthe a et | \y ae Xs 
a. sa A. = § ag Se tek 

Ro Pt ae Aare, AN _LUTe 4 +d Ss 

pane er ennele el YAY Yo rae aaharn tn ce 
eal wy eleldlelil " eat 


ne a \4q a 
BT s9Aj-~" A) aa can blah Sac, 


‘ Aro gid. . yhiih din 
th \a 84 4B ae panna . ; 
im Wie 4 1 yer re | a 
dad eat pre Ween Pr. = ppl” aaa enn nas7 Aha aap sib ARS hae WL aa, 
Ny Fe : ty aay 
pier y Pll | nt aur” - 92899 ~. nae ANN r\ 1 le Ay Ss The LL Sb Lyye 
. VR ary t 294: ann phe ". ‘ oe : 
ii Pee Weebl CELL lane aie ben Vee Na 
POE te ete te eat mma =a. | eee TTT LL EP et 


rs] 
ul 
a 
< 
a 
a 
z 
o 
= 
=) 
= 
= 
7) 
z 
z 
< 
z 
° 
a 
x 
= 
= 
n 


3 9088 01204 5522 


apap ere nae an 


; a ala pond were | 


ee ae 


fl 


r jarani , esadte hol Og” z ran re r.* tidas, ater label il 
fian* MYA | delenit NOL "Lh Ey wn, iE as 
ert) aie : Hg Waa! || HAS tana a4 ,nacenhays 
Maha Maa: i Ley 1) LLL eee || rN i aT a al -. Aw, 
ado) BR -° ® Wii as 6 Tmo t Noe ~ ape” cia | - eet al , § ae 
vA ae 1 78 al: ’ Adhd] Saks WooaaSt, ms Lys AL Leese] 1 i ta 
O-» ARR AEERae oniatar Wale! tot dat Braet gt Tehegts Acae” "5 Cen Tae 0; fa, e @ * 
. Re a A Mm Edda | Tr 1 t et 
*haan PA r ui minga: as cite.” ae ort aah et lai pre UAT 
YaA-. - ie SRaaBass 5 ey ~* % "a Re op pets a Pes, 
Na paransaassed Ag Aaacagenann sata waeetty rte 0 SOD NNN DL BAAN GND ARIMA RS an Ae SA 
Ma x B92 THT OPE TITTY PR san, WM anaati CaP 
- Q. ae plma, Sele van ae ear Ana * : Aa | 
y+ aog gh enol Nate Mads. Aa’ RL ew ¥ aq Aa ue ya" 
4 4 o- Aap lol leh olan aN tae 454A Re l* ane Pc ¢ a @ 
WW, bicane ee eee an 7 re git Pane 
ALN TY. s ‘ AR ae! 3 
optics, ann Delt) eal oe Var 
ap- 4p “ap AAS vA vi it 
rea. Bhan Tony | 4 7 — i 
BOPP a- Nr yen Rope wish 
s are-erak Kis ‘h eecerT || 
: Isl OU al he a 
4 he. ype ‘ 
: Wy a Manan ~aNe Rhaneet 6 § MAP: atl 
te mA A- | iy ent inaaaa 
TTY Valarsane sp <A anes Le 
WAARIERAR) Renate Ra NSD TN pw 
Nae. bean.” tae va. a | (?’