Skip to main content

Full text of "Annual report of the Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station"

See other formats


UMASS/AMHERST 


2066  0333   2577  7 


r 


r 


LIBRARY 

OF  THE 


MASSACHUSETTS 

AGRICULTURAL 

COLLEGE 


SOURCE. AI 

43^ 

s 

M  - 

V 

73 
E3 

\-^\ 

tp.2. 


Ag 


f  -2 


1 


Public  Document 


No.  31 


THIRTIETH  ANNUAL  REPORT 


MASSACHUSETTS  AGRICULTURAL 
EXPERIMENT  STATION. 


Parts  I.  and  II., 


Being  Pakts  III.  and  IV.  of  the  Fifty-fifth  Annual  Repokt  of  the 
Massachusetts  Agricultueal  College. 


January,    1918. 


Ending  the  Thirtt-fifth  Year  from  the  Founding  op  the  State 
Agricultural  Experiment  Station. 


BOSTON: 

WRIGHT  &  POTTER  PRINTING  CO.,  STATE  PRINTERS, 

32  DERNE  STREET. 

1918. 


Public  Document  No.  31 

THIRTIETH  AMUAL  REPORT 

OF  THK 

MASSACHUSETTS  AGRICULTURAL 
EXPERIMENT  STATION. 


Parts  I.  and  II., 


Being  Parts  III.  and  IV.  of  the  Fifty-fifth  Annual  Report  of  the 
Massachusetts  Agricultural  College. 


January,    1918. 


Ending  the  Thirty-fifth  Year  from  the   Founding  of  the   State 
Agricultural  Experiment  Station. 


BOSTON: 

WRIGHT   &  POTTER  PRINTING  CO.,   STATE   PRINTERS, 

32  DERNE  STREET. 

1918. 


Publication  of  this  Document 

approved  by  the 
Supervisor  of  Administration. 


THIRTIETH  ANNUAL  REPORT 

OF  THE 

Massachusetts 
Agricultural  Experiment  Station. 


Part  I. 

REPORT   OF  THE  DIRECTOR  AND   OTHER  OFFICERS. 


Part  II. 

DETAILED   REPORT   OF   THE   EXPERIMENT   STATION. 


A  Record  of  the  Thirty-fifth  Year  from  the  Founding  of  the  State  Agricultural 

Experiment  Station. 


CONTENTS. 


Part  I. 

PAGE 

Officers  and  staff,     ...........  !« 

Report  of  the  director,     ........••  3o 

Administration,          .          .          .          .          .          ...          .          .          .  3o 

Station  staff 3o 

Maintenance,         ..........  5a 

Publications,          ..........  6a 

Mailing  lists,          ..........  7a 

Essentials  for  needed  development,      .......  8a 

Work  of  the  year,      ..........  9o 

Statements  of  expenditures  for  special  lines  of  work,     ....  Ha 

Fertilizer  law  account,    .  .  .  .  .  .  .  •  .11a 

Feed  law  account,           .........  12a 

Graves'  orchard,    ..........  13a 

Tillson  farm, 14a 

Cranberry  substation,     .........  14a 

Tobacco  investigations,            ........  16a 

Report  of  the  treasurer,   ..........  17a 

United  States  appropriations,     ........  17a 

State  appropriations,          .........  18a 

Report  of  the  department  of  agricultural  economics,    .....  19a 

Report  of  the  department  of  agriculture,    .......  21o 

Field  A,  or  the  nitrogen  experiment,    .......  21a 

Field  B,  comparison  of  muriate  and  high-grade  sulfate  of  potash,  .          .  23a 

Field  C,  chemical  fertilizers  and  manure  for  market-garden  crops,            .  24a 

Field  G,  comparison  of  potash  salts,    .......  26a 

Comparison  of  different  phosphates,    .......  28a 

North  corn  acre,        ..........  29a 

North  soil  test 29o 

South  soil  test, 30a 

Grass  plots,      ...........  31a 

Sulfate  of  ammonia  v.  nitrate  of  soda  as  a  top-dressing  for  permanent 

mowings,         ..........  32a 

Variety  test  work,     ..........  32a 

Report  of  the  department  of  botany,          .          .          .          .          .          .          .  33a 

Report  of  the  department  of  chemistry,      .......  39a 

Research  section,       ..........  39a 

Fertilizer  section,       ..........  41a 

Fertilizers  registered,      .          ...          .          .          .          .          .          .  41o 

Fertilizers  collected  and  analyzed,    .......  41a 

Other  activities  of  the  fertilizer  section,    ......  42a 

Vegetation  tests,    ..........  42a 


VI 


CONTENTS. 


Report  of  the  department  of  chemistry  —  concluded.  page 

Feed  and  dairy  section,      .........  43a 

The  feeding  stuffs  law,   .........  43o 

The  dairy  law,       ..........  44a 

Milk,  cream  and  feeds  for  free  examination,      .....  47a 

Water, 47a 

Testing  of  pure-bred  cows  for  advanced  registry,        ....  48a 

Numerical  summary  of  laboratory  work,      ......  50a 

Report  of  the  department  of  entomology,  .......  51o 

Report  of  the  department  of  horticulture,            ......  54a 

Report  of  the  department  of  microbiology,          ......  55a 

Report  of  the  department  of  poultry  husbandry,          .....  57a 

Egg  production,         .          .          .          .          .          .          .         • .          .          .  57a 

Student  work,            ..........  59a 

Report  of  the  department  of  veterinary  science,           .....  61a 

Testing  of  fowl  for  the  detection  of  bacillary  white  diarrhcea,          .          .  61a 

Investigations  relative  to  Bacteriujn  pullorum  infection,          .          .          .  62a 

The  value  of  anti-hog-cholera  serum  in  the  prevention  of  hog  cholera,     .  63a 


Part  II. 
Bulletin  173.    The  cost  of  distributing  milk  in  six  cities  and  towns  in 
sachusetts. 
Foreword,         .... 
Introduction,    .... 
The  problem,    .... 
Co-operative  investigation, 
Scope  of  the  investigation. 
Processing  costs  and  delivery  costs, 
Difficulties  in  obtaining  data. 
Analysis  of  costs, 

Investment, 

Depreciation  problems,  . 

Maintenance, 

Working  capital,    . 

Labor,  .... 

Costs  of  processing  and  delivering  summarized 
Costs  classified  by  size  and  kind  of  business, 
Investment  and  size  of  business. 
Percentage  analysis  of  costs. 
Comparative  costs  by  localities, 

Amherst  v.  Walpole, 

Haverhill  v.  Pittsfield,     . 

Springfield  v.  Worcester, 
The  producer  as  a  distributor,    . 
Cost  of  delivery  of  special  milk, 
Cost  of  collection  and  distribution  of 

Motor  truck  delivery,     . 
Cost  of  distribution  of  cream,     . 
Significant  facts  of  distribution,  showing  individual  variations. 

Some  obvious  disadvantages  of  competitive  distribution  of  milk 
Suggestions  for  improving  conditions,  .... 

Bulletin  174.     The  composition,  digestibility  and   feeding  value  of 
kins,  ......... 

Summary  of  the  results,     ....... 

Composition  of  the  pumpkin,      ...... 


Mas- 


wholesale  milk  in  cans. 


pump- 


55 
55,  56 
57-62 


CONTENTS. 


vu 


Bulletin  174  —  concluded.  page 

Digestibility  of  pumpkins,  .......  62-66 

Feeding  experiments  with  pumpkins,  ......  66,  67 

Feeding  pumpkins  to  milch  cows  at  this  station,         .  .  .  67-71 

Bulletin  175.     Mosaic  disease  of  tobacco,  .......       73 

Introduction,    ...........       73 

Historical  summary,  .........       74 

Names,    .  .  .  .  .  .  .  ■  •  .  .  .78 

Description  of  the  mosaic  disease  of  tobacco,         .....       78 

Occurrence,       ...........       80 

Economic  importance,        .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .81 

Infectious  nature  of  the  disease,  .  .  .  .  .  .  .81 

Contagious  nature  of  the  disease,         .......       82 

Pathological  anatomy,        .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .83 

Leaves,  ...........       83 

Stems, 84 

Roots, 85 

Fungi  and  the  mosaic  disease,     ........       85 

Bacteria  and  the  mosaic  disease,  .......       86 

Dissemination  agents,         .........       87 

Insects,  ...........       87 

Workmen,     ...........       88 

Seed, 89 

Fertilization  in  relation  to  mosaic  disease,    ......       90 

Effect  of  colored  light  on  mosaic  disease,      .  .  .  .  .  .91 

Experimental  data,         .........       93 

Biochemical  studies,  .........       96 

Enzyme  activities  in  healthy  and  diseased  plants,      .  .  .  .96 

Reaction  of  mosaic  sap  with  various  substances,         ....     105 

Probable  character  of  the  causal  agent,    .  .  .  .  .  .110 

Prevention  and  control,      .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .113 

Summary,  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .117 

Bulletin  176.    The  cause  of  the  injurious  effect  of  sulfate  of  ammonia  when 

used  as  a  fertilizer,  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .119 

Part  I.,  Chenaical  investigations,  .......      119 

Part  II.,  Water  cultures 125 

Conclusions,     ...........     134 

Bulletin  177.     Potato  plant  lice  and  their  control,       .....     135 

Economic  importance  of  the  pest,        .......     135 

Description  of  potato  plant  lice,  .......     136 

Manner  of  feeding  and  nature  of  injury,       ......      136 

Life  cycle  of  the  potato  plant  louse,    .......     137 

Control  measures,      ..........      138 

Practical  considerations  and  fundamentals  of  control,  .  .  .     138 

Efficiency  of  various  contact  insecticides  for  the  control  of  potato  lice,     139 
Discussion  of  results,       .........      140 

"Black  Leaf  40," 140 

"Black  Leaf  40"  and  Pyrox,  etc.,  ......     141 

"Nico-Fume"  liquid,  ........      141 

Fish-oil  or  whale-oil  soaps,  ........      142 

Kerosene  emulsion,      .........      142 

Miscible  or  soluble  oils,        ........      143 

Lime-sulfur,        ..........     143 

Spraying  apparatus,        .........     143 

Summary  of  control  measures,    ........     144 

Natural  agents  in  the  control  of  potato  plant  lice,  ....     145 

Acknowledgments,     ..........     146 


VIU 


CONTENTS. 


Bulletin  178.    The  European  corn  borer,  Pyrausta  nuhilalis  Hubner,  a  recently 
established  pest  in  Massachusetts,     . 
Discovery  and  identification, 
Description  of  the  insect,  .... 
European  history,     ..... 
Status  of  the  pest  in  eastern  Massachusetts, 

Importation,  ..... 

Present  distribution,       .... 

Food  plants,  ..... 

Importance,  ..... 

Character  of  injury,  .... 

Life  history  and  habits,      .... 
Control,  .  .  .  .  .  .  . 

Co-operation,         ..... 

Bulletin  179.    The  greenhouse  red  spider  attacking  cucumbers  and  methodi 
for  its  control,  .... 

Introduction,    ...... 

History  and  distribution,  .... 

Food  plants,     ...... 

Nature  of  injury  to  cucumbers, 

Economic  importance  of  the  pest  on  cucumbers, 

Life  history,      ...... 

Feeding  habits  and  dispersion,    . 

Natural  enemies,       ..... 

Introduction  to  experiments, 

Experiments  conducted  in  the  laboratory,    . 

Fumigation  experiments. 

Spraying  experiments,    .... 

Summary  of  materials  found  to  be  efficient  experimentally 
Experiments  conducted  in  commercial  greenhouses. 

Lemon  oil,    ........ 

Linseed  oil  emulsion,      ...... 

Conclusions  drawn  from  commercial  spraying  experiments 
Prevention,       ........ 

Control  measures,      .  .  . 

Preventive  measures,      ...... 

Repressive  measures,      ...... 

Control  of  red  spiders  attacking  other  crops, 
Summary,         ........ 

Bibliography,   ........ 

Bulletin  180.     Report  of  the  cranberry  substation  for  1916, 
Blueberry  culture,     ....... 

Weather  observations,        ...... 

Frost  protection,        ....... 

Fungous  diseases,      ....... 

Storage  tests,    ........ 

Tentative  practical  conclusions  based  on  the  results  of  the  storage  tests 
Resanding,        ...... 

Fertilizers,        ...... 

Insects,    ....... 

The  cranberry  rootworm, 

The  gypsy  moth,  ..... 

The  cranberry  tip  worm. 

The  black-head  fireworm, 

The  cranberry  fruit  worm. 
Bog  management,     ..... 


CONTENTS. 


IX 


Bulletin  180  —  concluded. 

Observations  on  the  spoilage  of  cranberries  due  to  lack  of  proper  ven- 
tilation :  — 
Introduction,    ...... 

Temperature  tests  in  open  and  closed  cans, 
Effect  of  carbon  dioxide  on  cranberries, 
Effect  of  different  relative  humidities  on  spoilage  due  to  carbon  dioxide, 
Relation  of  fungi  to  spoilage  due  to  carbon  dioxide. 
Effect  of  carbon  dioxide  on  fungi  in  the  berries,    . 
Bulletin  181.     Digestion  experiments  with  sheep, 
Introduction,    ..... 

Composition  of  feedstuff s  (per  cent.). 

Composition  of  feces  (per  cent.). 

Weight  of  animals  at  beginning  and  end  of  each  period,  and  average  daily 

water  consumed. 
Digestion  coefficients  of  basal  ration  used  in 
coefficients,     .... 

Computation  of  digestion  coefficients, 
Discussion  of  results, 
English  hay  —  basal, 
English  hay  and  gluten  feed  —  basal, 
English  hay,  potato  starch  and  Diamond 
Gluten  feed  —  present  experiments, 
Gluten  feed  —  earlier  experiments, 
Diamond  gluten  meal,    . 
English  hay  fed  with  wheat  gluten  flour 

gluten  flour). 
Corn  bran,    . 


Distillers'  grains,   . 

Feterita, 

Alfalfa, 

Roots  and  vegetables. 

Cabbage,  . 

Carrots,     . 

Mangels,  . 

Pumpkins, 

Turnips,    . 

Comparative  summary, 
Vegetable  ivory  meal,     . 
Vinegar  grains. 

New  Bedford  garbage  tankage. 
New  Bedford  pig  meal,  . 
Rowen,  ... 

Soy  bean  hay, 

Stevens'  "44"  Dairy  Ration, 
Sudan  grass. 
Sweet  clover, 
Complete  summary  of  the  averages  of  all  coefficients, 


the  computation  of  digestion 


gluten  meal  —  basal. 


(to  note  effect  of  the 


wheat 


2.35 
236 

237 
238 
238 
239 
241 
241 
242 
249 

256 

263 
265 
306 
307 
308 
309 
310 
311 
312 

314 
316 
317 
318 
319 
319 
319 
321 
322 
323 
324 
325 
325 
326 
327 
328 
328 
329 
329 
330 
333 
334 


IVIassachusetts  Agricultural  Experiment  Station. 


Trustees. 


OFFICERS    AND    STAFF. 

COMMITTEE. 

Charles  H.  Preston,  Chairman, 

.     Hathorne 

Wilfrid  Wheeler,   . 

.     Concord. 

Edmund  Mortimer,  . 

.     Grafton. 

Arthur  G.  Pollard, 

.     Lowell. 

Harold  L.  Frost, 

.     Arlington 

The  President  of  the  College,  ex  officio. 
The  Director  of  the  Station,  ex  officio. 


STATION   STAFF. 

Administration.  William  P.  Brooks,  >  Ph.D.,  Director. 

Fbed  W.  Morse,  ^  M.Sc,  Acting  Director. 
Joseph  B.  Lindsey,  Ph.D.,  Vice-Director. 
Fred  C.  Kenney,  Treasurer. 
Charles  R.  Green,  B.Agr.,  Librarian. 
Mrs.  Lucia  G.  Church,  Clerk. 
Miss  F.  Ethel  Felton,  A.B.,  Clerk. 


Agricultural 
Economics. 


Alexander  E.  Cance,  Ph.D.,  In  Charge  of  Department. 
Samuel  H.  DeVault,  A.M.,  Assistant. 


Agriculture. 


William  P.  Brooks,  Ph.D.,  Agriculturist. 
Henry  J.  Franklin,  Ph.D.,  In  Charge  of  Cranberry  Investi- 
gations. 
Edwin  F.  Gaskill,  B.Sc,  Assistant  Agriculturist. 
Robert  L.  Coffin,  Assistant. 


Botany. 


A.  Vincent  Osmun,  M.Sc,  Botanist. 

George  H.  Chapman,  Ph.D.,  Research  Physiologist. 

Paul  J.  Anderson,  Ph.D.,  Associate  Plant  Pathologist. 

Orton  L.  Clark,  B.Sc,  Assistant  Plant  Physiologist. 

W.  S.  Krout,  M.A.,  Field  Pathologist. 

Miss  Mae  F.  Holden,  B.Sc,  Curator. 

Miss  Ellen  L.  Welch,  A.B.,  Stenographer. 


On  leave  from  March  1 . 


-  Beginning  March  1. 


2  a  EXPERIMENT  STATION 

Entomologry.  Henrt  T.  Fbrnald,'  Ph.D.,  Entomologist. 

Burton  N.  Gates,  Ph.D.,  Apiariat. 
Arthur  I.  Bourne,  A.B.,  Assistant  Entomologist. 
Stuart  C.  Vinal,  M.Sc,  Assistant  Entomologist. 
Miaa  Bridie  E.  O'Donnell,  Clerk. 


[Jan. 


Horticulture.  Frank  A.  Wauoh,  M.Sc,  Horticulturist. 

Fred  C.  Sears,  M.Sc,  Pomologist. 
Jacob  K.  Shaw,  Ph.D.,  Research  Pomologist. 
Harold  F.  Tompson,  B.Sc,  Market  Gardener. 
Miss  Etheltn  Streeter,  Clerk. 

Meteorologry.  John  E.  Osthander,  A.M.,  C.E.,  Meteorologist. 

Microbiology.  Charles  E.  Marshall,  Ph.D.,  In  Charge  of  Department. 

Arao  Itano,  Ph.D..  Assistant  Professor  of  Microbiology. 
George  B.  Rat,  B.Sc,  Graduate  Assistant. 


Plant  and  Animal 
Chemistry. 


Joseph  B.  Lindset,  Ph.D.,  Chemist. 

Edward  B.  Holland,  Ph.D.,  Associate  Chemist  in  Charge 

(Research  Division). 
Fred  W.  Morse,  M.Sc,  Research  Chemist. 
Henri  D.  Haskins,  B.Sc,  Chemist  in  Charge  (Fertilizer 

Division). 
Philip  H.  Smith,  M.Sc,  Chemist  in  Charge  (Feed  and  Dairy 

Division). 
Lewell  S.  Walker,  B.Sc,  Assistant  Chemist. 
Carlbton  p.  Jones,  M.Sc,  Assistant  Chemist. 
Carlos  L.  Beals,  M.Sc,  Assistant  Chemist. 
James  P.  Buckley,  Jr.,  Assistant  Chemist. 
Windom  a.  Allen,  -  B.Sc,  Assistant  Chemist. 
John  B.  Smith,  -  B.Sc,  Assistant  Chemist. 
Robert  S.  Scull,  2  B.Sc,  Assistant  Chemist. 
Bernard  L.  Peables,  B.Sc,  Assistaiit  Chemist. 
James  T.  Howard,  Inspector. 
Harry  L.  Allen,  Assistant  in  Laboratory. 
James  R.  Alcock,  Assistant  in  Animal  Nutrition. 
Miss  Alice  M.  Howard,  Clerk. 
Miss  Rebecca  L.  Mellob,  Clerk. 


Poultry  Husbandry.  John  C.  Graham,  B.Sc,  In  Charge  of  Department. 
Hubert  D.  Goodale,  Ph.D.,  Research  Biologist. 
Miss  Grace  Macmullen,  B.A.,  Clerk. 
Miss  Elizabeth  E.  Mooney,  Clerk. 


Veterinary  Science. 


James  B.  Paige,  B.Sc,  D.V.S.,  Veterinarian. 

G.  Edward  Gage,  Ph.D.,  Associate  Professor  of  Animal 

Pathology. 
John  B.  Lentz,  2  V.M.D.,  Assistant. 


•  On  leave. 


-  On  leave  on  account  of  military  service. 


191S.]  PUBLIC   DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  3a 


REPORT   OF  THE  DIRECTOR. 


WM.  P.   BROOKS. 


ADMINISTRATION. 
Station  Staff. 

Most  of  the  changes  in  the  station  staff  during  the  past  year 
have  been  in  minor  positions.  Four  men  have  entered  the  mili- 
tary service.  To  these,  indefinite  leaves  of  absence  without 
salary  have  been  granted,  with  the  understanding  that  the  posi- 
tions given  up  will  be  open  to  them  when  they  are  honorably 
discharged  from  the  service.  These  men  were  all  doing  satis- 
factory work,  and  their  going  creates  vacancies  which  it  will  be 
difficult  to  fill.  In  very  especial  degree  is  this  true  of  Dr.  John 
B.  Lentz,  who  volunteered  for  the  veterinary  service  of  the 
army,  and  who  is  now  in  France.  For  nearly  two  years  Dr. 
Lentz  had  been  in  direct  charge  of  the  blood  test  work  for  the 
elimination  of  bacillary  white  diarrhoea,  and  in  this  position  had 
shown  a  spirit,  a  devotion  to  duty  and  a  degree  of  ability  which 
rendered  his  services  of  very  unusual  value. 

Dr.  F.  H.  Hesselink  van  Suchtelen,  who  was  engaged  in  an 
important  line  of  investigation  on  the  organic  matter  of  soils, 
resigned  his  position  in  the  department  of  microbiology  in 
August  to  accept  a  chair  in  one  of  the  leading  universities  of 
Holland,  his  native  country.  Dr.  Arao  Itano,  who  for  several 
years  has  been  an  assistant  in  the  department  of  microbiology, 
and  in  that  position  shown  marked  ability  as  an  investigator, 
has  been  made  assistant  professor  in  the  department,  and  will 
pursue  a  line  of  investigation  closely  related  to  that  undertaken 
by  Dr.  van  Suchtelen. 

The  staff  has  been  strengthened  during  the  year  by  the  addi- 
tion of  two  men  for  important  lines  of  work  not  previously 
adequately  cared  for. 


4a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 

W.  S.  Kroiit,  M.A.,  was  made  field  pathologist  in  April,  and 
will  devote  himself  mainly  to  investigations  of  crop  diseases  as 
they  occur  upon  the  farms  and  in  the  gardens  of  the  State. 
Mr.  Krout,  a  graduate  of  Ohio  State  University,  came  to  us 
from  the  New  Jersey  Agricultural  Experiment  Station  where  he 
had  shown  peculiar  fitness  for  the  line  of  work  he  is  to  follow 
in  this  State. 

Stuart  C.  Vinal,  M.Sc,  who  had  for  two  years  as  graduate 
assistant  done  valuable  investigational  work  in  entomology,  was 
made  full  assistant  in  the  department  in  September,  and  is  to 
give  his  entire  time  to  study  of  insect  problems. 

Both  Mr.  Krout  and  Mr.  Vinal  will  devote  a  considerable 
share  of  their  attention  to  the  problems  affecting  our  market- 
garden  interests. 

Other  changes  in  station  staff  require  no  special  comment, 
though  attention  is  called  to  the  fact  that  resignations  have  in 
the  majority  of  cases  been  due  to  the  offer  of  higher  salaries  in 
other  quarters.  The  salaries  paid  here,  in  subordinate  positions 
especially,  are  low,  and  unless  they  can  be  raised  it  will  be  in- 
creasingly difficult  to  retain  the  services  of  good  men. 

Appointments  and  resignations  of  graduate  assistants  are  not 
included  as  all  such  appointments  are  on  a  yearly  basis,  and 
while  one  or  two  reappointments,  where  conditions  warrant  and 
where  acceptable,  are  the  rule,  these  positions  at  best  are 
temporary.  The  following  is  a  complete  statement  of  all  other 
changes  during  the  year. 

Resig7iatio7iS. 
Miss  Marcella  C.  Curry,  A.B.,  Clerk,  Department  of  Poultry  Husbandry. 
Miss  Eleanor  Barker,  Clerk,  Department  of  Horticulture. 
Miss  Grace  B.  Nutting,  Ph.B.,  Curator,  Department  of  Botany. 
F.  H.  Hesselink  van  Suchtelen,  Ph.D.,  Associate  Professor  of  Microbiology. 
C.  Theodore  Buchholz,  V.M.D.,  Assistant,  Department  of  Veterinary 

>Science. 

Appointments. 

Miss  Grace  B.  Nutting,  Ph.B.,  Curator,  Department  of  Botany. 
Miss  Ellen  L.  Welch,  A.B.,  Stenographer,  Department  of  Botany. 
Robert  S.   Scull,  B.Sc,  Assistant,   Department  of  Plant  and  Animal 

Chemistry. 
Miss  Rachael  G.  Leslie,  Clerk,  Department  of  Poultry  Husbandry. 
W.  S.  Krout,  M.A.,  Field  Pathologist,  Department  of  Botany. 
Miss  Mae  F.  Holden,  B.Sc,  Curator,  Department  of  Botany. 


191S.]  PUBLIC   DOCLTMEXT  —  No.  31.  5a 

Samuel  H.  DeVault,  A.M.,  Assistant,  Department  of  Agricultural  Eco- 
nomics. 

Arao  Itano,  Ph.D.,  Assistant  Professor,  Department  of  Microbiology. 

Stuart  C.  Vinal,  M.Sc,  Assistant,  Department  of  Entomology. 

Miss  Ethelyn  Streeter,  Clerk,  Department  of  Horticulture. 

C.  Theodore  Buchholz,  V.M.D.,  Assistant,  Department  of  Veterinary 
Science. 

Bernard  L.  Peables,  B.Sc,  Assistant,  Department  of  Plant  and  Animal 
Chemistry. 

Leaves  of  Absence  on  Accoxint  of  Military  Service. 

John  B.  Lentz,  V.M.D.,  Assistant,  Department  of  Veterinary  Science, 
from  August  31. 

Robert  S.  Scull,  B.Sc,  Assistant,  Department  of  Plant  and  Animal  Chem- 
istry, from  September  11. 

Windom  A.  Allen,  B.Sc,  Assistant,  Department  of  Plant  and  Animal 
Chemistry,  from  September  16. 

John  B.  Smith,  B.Sc,  Assistant,  Department  of  Plant  and  Animal  Chem- 
istry, from  October  5. 

Maintenance. 
In  accordance  with  the  provision  by  the  Legislature  of  1912, 
the  amount  received  from  the  State  for  general  expenses  was 
$5,000  greater  than  last  year.  The  total  revenues  of  the  station 
were  not  quite  $4,500  larger  than  last  year,  as  there  were 
shrinkages  in  receipts  from  sales  of  crops  and  in  the  fees  ob- 
tained under  the  fertilizer  law.  The  total  revenues  are  shown 
in  the  following  table :  — 

Total  Revenue  for  the  Fiscal  Year,  Dec.  1,  1916,  to  Nov.  30,  1917. 

State  appropriation, $35,000  00 

Federal  appropriations :  — 

Hatch  fund, 15,000  00 

Adams  fund, 15,000  00 

Agricultural  department,  sales  and  labor,         ....  4,810  22 

Chemical  department,  sales,  cow  testing  and  analytical  work,  11,939  54 

Miscellaneous  receipts  from  various  departments,  ...  50  49 

Blood  tests, 560  31 

Fertilizer  law,        .        .        . 9,040  00 

Feed  law, 6,000  00 

Cranberry  substation, 3,172  02 

Graves'  orchard, 133  48 

Tillson  farm, 1,120  55 

Total, $101,826  61 


6  a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 

The  cost  of  executing  the  provisions  of  the  fertilizer  and  feed 
laws  was  $16,132.24,  which  left  for  the  general  work  of  the  sta- 
tion $85,694.37.  From  this  amount  there  was  required  in  round 
numbers  $12,000  for  the  cost  of  cow  testing,  standardizing  dairy 
apparatus,  making  water  analyses  and  performing  interdepart- 
ment  services,  thus  leaving  for  investigations  approximately 
$73,700,  which  was  about  $6,000  more  than  in  the  previous 
year.    The  treasurer's  report  will  be  found  on  pages  17a  and  18  a. 


Publication. 

The  list  of  publications  for  the  year  includes  nine  bulletins 
aggregating  335  pages  in  the  regular  series,  and  two  bulletins  in 
the  control  series  aggregating  94  pages.  The  arrangement  re- 
garding circulars,  which  was  mentioned  in  the  last  report,  re- 
sulted in  all  the  circulars  for  the  year  being  cared  for  by  the 
extension  service. 

Annxial  Report. 

Twenty-ninth  annual  report :  — 

Part    I.     Report  of  the  Director  and  Other  Officers;  92  pages. 

Part  II.     Detailed  Report  of  the  Experiment  Station;  307  pages  (being 

Bulletins  Nos.  168-172). 
Combined  Contents  and  Index,  Parts  I.  and  II.;  20  pages. 

Bulletins. 

No.  173.  The  Cost  of  Distributing  Milk  in  Six  Cities  and  Towns  in 
Massachusetts,  by  Alexander  E.  Cance  and  Richard  Hay 
Ferguson;  54  pages. 

No.  174.  The  Composition,  Digestibility  and  Feeding  Value  of  Pump- 
kins, by  J.  B.  Lindsey;  18  pages. 

No.  175.     Mosaic  Disease  of  Tobacco,  by  G.  H.  Chapman;  46  pages. 

No.  176.  The  Cause  of  the  Injurious  Effect  of  Sulfate  of  Ammonia  when 
used  as  a  Fertilizer,  by  R.  W.  Ruprecht  and  F.  W.  Morse; 
16  pages. 

No.  177.  Potato  Plant  Lice  and  their  Control,  by  W.  S.  Regan;  12 
pages. 

No.  178.  The  European  Corn  Borer,  Pyrausia  nuhilalis  Hiibner,  a 
recently  established  pest  in  Massachusetts,  by  S.  C.  Vinal; 
6  pages. 

No.  179.  The  Greenhouse  Red  Spider  attacking  Cucumbers  and  Meth- 
ods for  its  Control,  by  S.  C.  Vinal;  30  pages. 


1918.]  PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  la 

Xo.  ISO.  Report  of  the  Cranberry  Substation  for  1916,  by  H.  J.  Frank- 
lin, and  Observations  on  the  Spoilage  of  Cranberries  due  to 
Lack  of  Proper  Ventilation,  by  C.  L.  Shear  and  Neil  E. 
Stevens,  Pathologists,  and  B.  A.  Rudolph,  Scientific  Assist- 
ant, Fruit-Disease  Investigations,  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry, 
United  States  Department  of  Agriculture;  58  pages. 

No.  181.  Digestion  Experiments  with  Sheep,  by  J.  B.  Lindsey,  C.  L. 
Beals  and  P.  H.  Smith;  95  pages. 

Bullet ijis,  Control  Series. 

No.  7.    Inspection  of  Commercial  Feedstuffs,  by  P.  H.  Smith;  30  pages. 
No.  8.     Inspection  of  Commercial  Fertilizers,  by  H.  D.  Haskins;  64  pages. 

Meteorological  Reports. 
Twelve  numbers,  4  pages  each. 

Mailing  Lists. 
At  considerable  expense  for  time  and  labor  our  mailing  lists 
have  been  maintained  in  as  live  a  condition  as  possible,  and  at 
present  are  arranged  by  lists,  as  tabulated  below. 

Residents  of  Massachusetts  (general),      .        .        .        .        .        .  11,603 

Residents  of  other  States  (general), 1,549 

Residents  of  other  States  (technical  and  general) ,  .        .        .        .1 ,068 

Exchange  list, 249 

Massachusetts  libraries, 191 

Out-of-State  libraries, 251 

Massachusetts  agricultural  schools  and  departments,    ...  55 

Massachusetts  county  farm  bureaus, 12 

Massachusetts   Agricultural   College   and   Experiment   Station 

staffs, 101 

Beekeepers, 4,356 

Newspapers, 436 

Cranberry  growers, 1,398 

Meteorological, 385 

Feed  list, " 250 

Fertilizer  list, 86 

Massachusetts  milk  inspectors, 158 

Massachusetts  milk  dealers, 135 

Miscellaneous  special  lists, 254 

United  States  Department  of  Agriculture,  official  list,  .        .        .  3,602  ^ 

Total, 26,139  2 


'  Publications  are  not  as  a  rule  sent  to  all  on  this  list,  but  only  to  directors,  libraries  and 
specialists  likely  to  be  interested. 

2  Of  this  total,  314  foreign  addresses  are  included  under  different  lists. 


8a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 


ESSENTIALS  FOR  NEEDED  DEVELOPMENT. 

In  the  last  annual  report  there  was  presented  a  statement 
covering  the  more  essential  requirements  for  the  normal  devel- 
opment of  the  station  work  for  the  next  five  years,  which  was 
prepared  at  the  suggestion  of  the  Special  Commission  on  Agri- 
cultural Education  at  the  Massachusetts  Agricultural  College 
and  the  Development  of  the  Agricultural  Resources  of  the  Com- 
monwealth. Some  progress  has  been  made  during  the  year  in 
meeting  these  needs. 

Arrangements  have  been  completed  for  the  purchase  of  the 
Tillson  farm,  though  it  will  still  be  necessary  for  the  next  three 
years  for  the  station  to  pay  the  sum  agreed  upon  for  the  annual 
rent,  which,  however,  under  the  plan  adopted,  will  be  directly 
applied  toward  the  payment  of  the  purchase  price  which  will 
then  be  met  in  full. 

Two  lots  of  land  are  still  needed,  as  described  last  year,  viz., 
the  Tuxbury  land  which  is  leased  for  orchard  experiments,  and 
a  suitable  poultry  farm.  It  seems  necessary  to  present  again 
these  two  important  projects  for  development,  that  they  may 
be  kept  in  mind  by  the  followers  of  the  station's  work. 

The  Tuxbury  land  includes  a  total  area  of  about  30  acres,  of 
which  18  acres  are  now  leased  by  the  station,  and  the  remainder 
consists  of  sprout  land.  It  is  estimated  to  cost  now  about 
$12,000,  but  the  price  is  sure  to  increase.  A  large  part  of  the 
leased  land  is  planted  to  apple  orchard  for  the  experiment  with 
stock  and  cion  relationships.  The  trees  will  barely  have  reached 
the  period  of  most  profitable  production  at  the  expiration  of  the 
lease.  Ultimate  ownership  is  highly  desirable,  and  it  seems  the 
part  of  wisdom  to  acquire  the  property  at  as  early  a  date  as 
possible. 

The  area  desired  for  a  poultry  farm  is  about  60  acres,  and  it 
is  estimated  that  such  a  farm  will  cost  $8,000.  We  have  for 
some  years  been  compelled  to  lease  land  on  which  to  raise 
young  stock,  and  this  policy  is  quite  unsatisfactory. 

Building  needs  have  not  been  met  and  remain  as  described 
last  year,  viz.,  house,  barn  and  sheds  for  the  Tillson  farm, 
buildings  for  the  poultry  department,  an  addition  to  the  build- 


1918.]  PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  9a 

ing  at  the  cranberry  substation,  and  greenhouses  for  experi- 
mental work  at  the  market-garden  field  station. 

Important  additions  to  the  station  staff  made  during  the  year 
have  been  mentioned,  but  men  are  needed  to  take  up  addi- 
tional lines  of  work.  There  is  decided  need  for  experimental 
work  in  rural  engineering,  in  floriculture  and  in  forestry.  Pro- 
vision for  this  work  should  be  made  at  as  early  a  date  as 
possible.  Particularly  urgent  are  investigations  in  rural  en- 
gineering and  in  forestry.  There  will  be  required,  also,  mod- 
erate increases  in  salaries  for  a  considerable  number  of  those 
now  on  the  station  staff.  It  is  estimated  that  to  provide  for 
the  new  men  and  the  needed  increases  will  require  within  five 
years  an  addition  to  the  amount  now  available  for  salaries  of 
$40,000. 

Increases  for  annual  support  of  the  station  work  and  equip- 
ment were  quite  carefully  estimated  in  last  year's  report  and 
amounted  to  $30,000. 

WORK  OF  THE  YEAR. 

The  serious  situation  as  affecting  the  food  supply  due  to  the 
war  suggested  the  desirability  of  a  careful  consideration  of  the 
question  as  to  whether  lines  of  investigation  in  progress  should 
not  be  modified  and  new  ones  undertaken.  With  a  view  to 
getting  suggestions  from  individuals  who  it  was  believed  are  as 
well  qualified  to  make  such  suggestions  as  any  in  the  State,  a 
meeting  of  the  advisory  council,  composed  of  representatives  of 
the  various  agricultural  interests,  was  called  in  June,  The  in- 
vestigations in  progress  were  quite  comprehensively,  though  of 
nece^ity  briefly,  described,  after  which  opportunity  was  given 
for  discussion  and  suggestions.  If  we  may  judge  from  the  fact 
that  no  important  new  investigations  were  suggested,  it  would 
appear  that  the  scope  of  our  work  as  affecting  food  production 
and  distribution  was  regarded  by  the  members  of  the  council 
present  as  fairly  satisfactorily  covering  the  ground. 

During  the  past  year  we  have  undertaken  a  few  new  lines  of 
investigation.  In  connection  with  the  oranberrj'  substation  in 
Wareham  we  have  established  in  co-operation  with  the  Bureau 
of  Plant  Industry  of  the  United  States  Department  of  Agri- 


10  a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 

culture  a  plantation  of  swamp  blueberries,  with  a  view  to  in- 
vestigating the  possibilities  of  blueberry  culture. 

The  very  high  price  of  the  cereal  grains  has  indicated  the 
probability  that  under  existing  conditions  Massachusetts  may 
profitably  engage  in  the  production  of  these  grains  on  a  much 
more  extensive  scale  than  in  recent  years.  A  considerable  area 
on  the  Tillson  farm,  and  a  smaller  area  on  the  home  grounds  of 
the  station,  therefore,  are  being  used  for  the  trial  of  nine  differ- 
ent varieties  of  winter  wheat  and  a  new  variety  of  winter  rye 
and  of  winter  barley. 

The  chemical  department,  in  co-operation  with  several  other 
experiment  stations,  under  the  general  suggestive  leadership  of 
Dr.  H.  P.  Armsby,  is  beginning  a  series  of  experiments  to  de- 
termine the  minimum  protein  requirements  of  growing  animals. 
The  solution  of  this  problem  should  have  an  important  bearing 
upon  the  economy  of  meat  production. 

A  number  of  forage  crops  new  in  the  agriculture  of  the  State 
and  a  considerable  number  of  feeds  also  relatively  unknown 
have  been  under  investigation  as  regards  their  value  and  adapt- 
ability to  local  conditions. 

Important  investigations  which  should  throw  light  upon  the 
most  satisfactory  methods  of  feeding  horses  have  been  begun 
during  the  year.  In  these  investigations  the  digestibility  by 
horses  of  the  important  feeding  stuffs,  and  their  available  energy 
in  the  animal  economy,  will  be  determined. 

Experiments  having  indicated  the  superior  value  of  the  types 
of  rust-resistant  asparagus  produced  in  the  breeding  work  at 
Concord,  a  considerable  area  has  been  set  with  plants  of  the 
best  variety  for  the  purpose  of  producing  seed  in  such  quantities 
that  the  demand  of  growers  of  the  crop  for  the  new  variety 
may  be  met. 

As  the  probable  value  of  soy  beans  in  the  existing  and  pro- 
spective food  emergency  has  been  quite  generally  recognized,  it 
was  felt  that  there  would  be  a  large  demand  for  seed,  and  a  con- 
siderable area  on  the  Tillson  farm,  as  well  as  smaller  areas  on 
such  of  the  station  plots  as  could  be  used  for  the  purpose,  were 
planted  to  one  of  the  best  varieties. 

Fairly  satisfactory  progress  has  been  made  in  the  investiga- 


1918.]  PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  11a 

tion  into  the  causes  of  tobacco  sickness,  although  a  hail  storm 
of  exceptional  severity  did  much  damage  to  a  portion  of  the 
plots. 

The  control  work  of  the  station  has  received  the  usual  careful 
attention.  The  high  price  and  scarcity  of  fertilizers  seems  to 
have  suggested  unusual  activity  on  the  part  of  those  engaged  in 
the  production  and  sale  of  relatively  worthless  articles.  An 
energetic  campaign,  believed  to  have  been  quite  successful,  was 
carried  on  with  a  view  to  preventing  or  limiting  the  amount  of 
such  sales. 

The  reports  from  the  different  departments  of  station  work, 
summarizing  their  activities  for  the  year,  will  be  found  follow- 
ing the  treasurer's  report,  on  pages  17  a  and  18  a. 


STATEMENTS  OF  EXPENDITURES  FOR  SPECIAL  LINES  OF 

WORK. 

Fertilizer  Law  Account,  Dec.  1,  1916,  to  Nov.  30,  1917. 

Balance  Dec.  1,  1916, $859  81 

Total  fees, 9,040  00 

$9,899  81 

Expenditures. 

Chemicals, $269  52 

Apparatus, 275  08 

Salaries :  — 

Chemical  and  administrative,  .        $5,395  32 

Clerical, 520  00 

5,915  32 

Collection  expenses:  — 

Inspector's  salary,       .        .        .  $722  83 

Travel, 773  49 

Freight  and  express,   .        .        .  25  17 

1,521  49 

Laboratory  assistance, 164  97 

Official  travel, 64  32 

Gas, 133  01 

Office  supplies, 23  79 

Miscellaneous  supplies, 58  30 

Repairs, 12  89 


12  a  EXPERIMENT  STATION. 

Publication  and  mailing :  — 

Control  Bulletin  No.  6,      .        .  $870  20 

Fertilizer  law  circulars,      .       .  8  50 

Mailing, 31  05 

$909  75 

Laundry, 12  70 

Legal  services, 48  94 

Fertilizer  experiment :  — 

Fertilizers, ,      .        .        .  2  00 

Total, 5 

Balance  Dec.  1,  1917, 

Feed  Law  Account,  Dec.  1,  1916,  to  Nov.  30,  1917. 
Balance  on  hand  Dec.  1,  1916,     ....       $2,048  07 
State  appropriation, 6,000  00 


[Jan. 


),412  08 


:87  73 


5,048  07 


Expenditures. 


Salaries :  — 
Chemical, 
Clerical, 

Collection  expenses :  — 
Inspector's  salary, 
Inspector's  travel, 
Express  on  samples. 

Laboratory  assistance. 

Gas,  .... 

Apparatus, 

Chemicals, 

Office  supplies. 

Miscellaneous  travel. 

Telephone, 

Repairs,    . 

Miscellaneous  supplies. 

Laundry,  . 

Legal  expenses :  — 

Lawyer's  fees, 

Travel,  . 


52,861  30 
420  00 


$360  00 

337  55 

6  57 


$54  00 
27  35 


5,281  30 


704  12 
89  63 
35  13 
20  82 

222  52 

2  39 
59  07 
15  53 
11  91 
70  75 

3  62 


81  35 


191S.]  rUBLIC   DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  13a 

Feeding  experiment  with  horses :  — 

Salary, $300  00 

Repairs  to  building,    .       .       .  878  44 

Travel, 104  30 

Apparatus, 39  35 

SI  ,322  09 

Publication :  — 

Control  Bulletin  No.  5,      .       .  S781  20 
Addressing  envelopes  and  mail- 
ing,          18  33 

799  53 

Total, $6,719  76 

Balance  Dec.  1,  1917,     .        .        .        .        .        .        .        .      $1,328  31 

Graves'  Orchard,  Dec.  1,  1916,  to  Nov.  30,  1917. 
Apportionment, $700  00 

Expenditures. 
Hauling  and  spreading  manure,  mixing  fertilizers  and 

burning  brush, $21  05 

Pruning, 54  15 

Spraying  and  spray  materials, 50  67 

Harrowing, 30  90 

Thinning, 21  40 

Harvesting, 134  30 

Barrels,         .        .        .       .      ' 89  10 

Freight  on  barrels, 6  60 

Measuring  trees, 1  13 

Rent, 75  00 

Travel, 59  76 

Mowing  (1916), 2  00 

Care  of  bees,        ....;....  2  00 

Total, 548  06 

Balance  Dec.  1,  1917, $151  94 

Receipts. 

Barrels  (1916  bill), $29  70 

Apples  (1917  crop),i 103  78 

Total, $133  48 

1  Balance  of  crop  valued  at  $1,000. 


14  a 


EXPERIMENT  STATION. 


[Jan. 


TiLLSON  Farm,  Dec.  1,  1916,  to  Nov.  30,  1917. 


Expenditures. 


Receipts 


Apportionment , 

Rent, 

Taxes, 

Repairs,    . 

Travel, 

Apple  orchard:  — 

1916  crop, 

1917  crop, 
Corn, 
Grasslands:  — 

1916  crop, 

1917  crop, 
Pasture, 
Soy  beans. 
Squash,     . 
Tomatoes:  — 

1916  crop  (seed), 

1917  crop. 
Wheat, 

Totals, 


?3S5  00 
54  54 
12  50 
23  24 


123  62 

205  57 
302  97 

57  77 
289  17 

18  70 

30  00 
36  00 
44  77 


SI. 67 


81,400  00 
37  00 


13  75 
109  50 


466  48 
111  992 
150  00 

-1 

5  232 

180  40 
46  20 


S2,520  55 


1  Crop  not  yet  sold. 

-  Larger  part  of  crop  unsold. 


'  Winter  wheat  planted  in  the  fall  of  1917 


Cranberry  Substation,  Dec.  1,  1916,  to  Nov.  30,  1917. 
Receipts. 

Cranberries,  crop  of  1916, $1,734  66 

Cranberries,  crop  of  1917, 1,247  85 

United  States  Weather  Bureau,      ....  125  83 

Unneeded  apparatus  returned  and  sold,       .        .  63  68 


Bills  receivable  on  Dec.  1,  1917  (estimated). 
Cranberries  on  hand  Dec.  1,  1917  (estimated), 


Total  received  and  receivable, S4,200  02 


S3,172  02 
545  00 
483  00 


1918. 


PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31. 


15a 


Expenditures  —  Bog  Accoiint. 
Maintenance :  — 

Tools  and  similar  equipment  bought  or  re- 
paired,       Sll  58 

Oil  for  engine,  etc.  (gasoline,  kerosene,  lubri- 
cating),      180  25 

Pumping  labor, 31  88 

Mowing  of  upland, 57  61 

Weeding, 55  93 

Lumber  and  hardware, 3  91 

Raking  vines  after  picking,     ....  48  15 

Resanding  the  bog,  .        .        .        ...        .  226  43 

Miscellaneous  labor, 59  17 

Sundries, 4  40 

Harvesting :  — 

Picking  cranberries, $456  68 

Separating  cranl^erries, 38  37 

Screening  cranberries, 181  69 

Packing  cranberries  and  tending  screeners,  .  57  00 

Carting  cranberries, 30  39 

Coopering  and  mending  boxes,       ...  21  55 

Packing  materials  (barrels,  crates,  etc.),       .  214  76 

Contingent, 2  50 


Improvements :  — 
Building  roads, 


Expenditures  —  Experimental  Account 

Experimental  labor, 

Supplies  and  apparatus, 

Office  machines  and  appliances. 

Chemicals  (including  fertilizers  and  insecticides) 

Lumber, 

Traveling  expenses, 

Stenographer, 

Printing, 

Rental  of  dry  bog  for  season  of  1916,    . 
Blueberry  plantation :  — 

Sewer  pipe, 

Constructing  flume  and  pipe  line  for  irri 
gating  the  plantation,  .        .        .        . 

Transplanting  selected  wild  bushes, 

Plowing  and  harrowing,  .... 

Cultivating  and  hoeing,   .... 

Sundries, 


$19  78 


10  05 

20  81 

20  90 

5  35 

4  48 

579  31 


1,002  94 
9  30 

$1,691  55 

$1,031  98 
204  96 
22  69 
27  41 
60  25 
86  13 
116  32 
25  00 
60  00 


81  37 


16a 


EXPERIMENT  STATION. 


[Jan. 


Contingent :  — 

Freight  and  express, 
Telephone,         .... 

Fuel, 

Furnishings,       .... 
Books,  stationery  and  postage, 


Total, $1,836  94 


$20  75 

19  64 

31  50 

44  00 

4  94 

$120  83 

Summary  of  Disbursements. 

Disbursements  on  bog  account,      .... 
Disbursements  on  experimental  account, 

Total  disbursements, 


U,691  55 
1,836  94 


Tobacco  Investigations,  1917. 
Expenditures  {exclusive  of  Salaries). ''■ 


Fertilizers,^ 

Travel, 

Land  rental,' 

Extra  labor, 

Cartage, 

Photographic  work, 

Stakes, 

Total  cost, 


$408  46 

215  14 

110  00 

6  75 

7  75 

8  85 

2  16 

Materials  on  Hand. 
1 ,000  pounds  high-grade  sulfate  of  potash  at  $240,          $120  00 
Miscellaneous  fertilizers, 8  40 


J,528  49 


$759  11 


128  40 


Net  cost  of  investigations, $630  71 

Owing  to  illness  Director  Brooks  was  given  a  leave  of  absence 
from  March  1,  1918.  The  material  for  the  annual  report  had 
been  practically  all  written  but  not  assembled  and  arranged 
before  this  date. 

FRED  W.  MORSE, 

Acting  Director. 

1  Approximate  amount  for  salaries,  81,583.35. 

-  One  item  of  $4.31  was  not  paid  out  of  1917  apportionment. 

2  The  rate  of  rental  was  to  be  $40  per  acre  for  open  plots  and  $90  per  acre  for  shade  plots,  and 
this  item  would  be  $170;  but  for  1917  one  grower  donated  the  use  of  1  acre  of  land  and  another 
the  use  of  one-half  acre,  reducing  rental  by  560. 


191S.] 


PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31. 


17a 


REPORT  OF  THE  TREASURER. 


ANNUAL  REPORT 

Of  Fred  C.  Kenney,  Treasurer  of  the  Massachusetts  Agricul- 
tural "Experiment  Station  of  the  Massachusetts  Agricultur.\l 

COLLE    E,  for  the  YeAR  ENDING  JuNE   30,   1917. 


United  States  Appropriations,  1916-17. 

Hatch  Fund. 

Adams  Fund. 

Dr. 

To  receipts  from  the  Treasurer  of  the  United 

States,  as  per  appropriations  for  fiscal  year 

ended  June  30,  1917,  under  acts  of  Congress 

approved  March  2,  1887,  and  March  16, 1906, 

Cr. 
By  salaries, 

$15,000  00 
$15,000  00 

$15,000  00 
$15,000  00 

18  a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 


State  Appropriation,  1916-17. 

Cash  balance  brought  forward  from  last  fiscal  year,        .       .  $16,359  90 

Cash  received  from  State  Treasurer, 38,500  00 

fees, 9,641  81 

sales, 10,903  08 

miscellaneous, 12,418  39 

$87,823  18 

Cash  paid  for  salaries, $25,558  43 

labor,        .        .    • 22,912  62 

publications, 2,440  80 

postage  and  stationery, 1,971  85 

freight  and  express, 354  83 

heat,  light,  water  and  power,       ....  482  03 

chemicals  and  laboratory  supplies,     .        .       .  2,435  29 

seeds,  plants  and  sundry  supplies,      .        .        .  2,643  97 

fertilizer, 1,056  51 

feeding  stuffs, 1,670  01 

library, 685  23 

tools,  machinery  and  appliances,        .       .       .  787  95 

furniture  and  fixtures, 641  61 

scientific  apparatus  and  specimens,    .        .        .  546  74 

live  stock, 446  20 

traveling  expenses, 4,037  79 

contingent  expenses,      .        .        .  '    .        .        .  25  00 

buildings  and  land, 3,225  32 

balance, .  15,901  00 

Total, $87,823  18 


1918.1  PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  19a 


DEPARTMENT  OF  AGRICULTURAL 
ECONOMICS. 


ALEXANDER   E.  CANCE. 


The  work  of  the  department  this  year  has  been  prosecuted 
along  two  lines,  —  first,  the  regular  research  projects,  and 
second,  war  emergency  projects  requiring  immediate  attention 
and  less  thorough  inv^estigation. 

Regular  Projects. 
The  investigation  into  methods  and  cost  of  tobacco  market- 
ing has  been  continued  by  Mr.  S.  H.  DeVault,  research  assist- 
ant, and  is  being  rounded  into  shape.  As  an  incident  of  this 
investigation  he  has  been  asked  by  groups  of  farmers  to  present 
plans  for  some  marketing  organization  of  farmers,  by  means  of 
which  the  production  and  market  distribution  of  the  tobacco  of 
the  Connecticut  Valley  may  be  conducted  more  economically. 

Emergency  Projects. 

(a)  Census  of  Agricultural  Production.  —  The  department 
holds  that  any  intelligent  program  of  farm  production  must  be 
based  on  a  knowledge  of  the  agricultural  resources,  —  land  and 
equipment,  —  labor  and  previous  farm  practices.  There  are  no 
such  facts  available  by  towns  later  than  1905.  For  this  reason 
the  department  initiated  and  directed  such  a  census  in  Hamp- 
shire, Franklin,  Berkshire  and  Worcester  counties,  beginning 
early  in  April,  1917.  The  data  were  tabulated  at  the  college, 
and  copies  sent  to  the  county  farm  bureaus  and  the  public 
safety  committees  of  the  counties  and  of  each  town. 

(6)  Consumption  Survey.  —  A  survey  of  the  food  and  feed 
consumption  of  every  town  and  city  in  Hampshire  County  of 
5,000  or  over  population,  and  15  towns  and  cities  in  Hampden 
County,  was  undertaken  by  Mr.  DeVault  and  assistants  last 
spring.    The  purpose  was  to  ascertain  the  food  and  feed  needs 


20  a  EXPERDIEXT  STATION.  [Jan. 

of  the  people  as  determined  by  the  purchases  and  sales  of  re- 
tailers, wholesalers,  fruit  stands,  restaurants  and  bakeries, 
hotels,  boarding  houses  and  transportation  companies,  to  ascer- 
tain how  many  of  these  products  are  purchased  locally,  how 
many  are  shipped  in  and  what  is  the  amount  ordinarily  stored. 
The  survey  included  403  retail  stores,  37  hotels  and  boarding 
houses,  42  fruit  stands,  24  restaurants  and  lunch  counters,  and 

21  bakeries,  serving  144,000  people.  In  general,  it  was  found 
that  these  establishments  purchase  a  comparatively  small  per- 
centage of  local  products.  For  example,  only  8  per  cent,  of  the 
beans,  22  per  cent,  of  the  potatoes,  58  per  cent,  of  the  apples, 
33  per  cent,  of  the  eggs,  12  per  cent,  of  the  butter,  63  per  cent, 
of  the  milk,  32  per  cent,  of  the  cabbage  and  4§  per  cent,  of  the 
meats  handled  by  these  establishments  are  locally  produced. 
Using  the  detailed  data  of  this  investigation  it  is  possible  to  plan 
to  meet  the  needs  of  this  population  in  a  manner  somewhat 
more  economical  and  more  efficient  than  at  present,  and  prefer- 
ably by  the  production  and  use  of  local  products. 

The  data  have  been  partially  tabulated  and  interpreted,  and 
copies  have  been  sent  back  to  the  local  authorities  for  use  in 
their  food  campaign.  The  department  hopes  to  publish  the 
results  of  the  survey  this  year.  Only  lack  of  funds  has  pre- 
vented a  further  and  more  complete  study. 

(c)  Market  Milk  Investigation.  —  In  August,  1917,  the  de- 
partment of  agricultural  economics  was  asked  by  the  Boston 
Chamber  of  Commerce  and  the  Attorney-General  of  Massachu- 
setts to  undertake  an  investigation  of  the  distributing  costs  of 
twenty  or  more  milk  dealers  in  the  city  of  Boston,  to  the  end 
that  equitable  prices  for  producing  and  marketing  milk  might  be 
established.  Mr.  William  L.  Machmer  and  Mr.  Otto  F.  Wilkin- 
son of  the  college  staff  were  assigned  the  field  work  about 
September  1,  and  in  six  weeks  were  ready  to  make  a  prelimi- 
nary report  on  twenty  dealers  handling  approximately  12,600,000 
quarts  of  milk  and  cream  annually,  a  commendable  record  of 
efficiency  and  economy.  A  similar  investigation  of  another 
group  of  dealers  conducted  at  the  same  time  cost  the  State  five 
to  ten  times  more.  These  data  were  used  by  the  Federal  Dis- 
trict Milk  Commission  in  making  their  award.  The  depart- 
ment hopes  to  publish  the  data  as  a  supplement  to  Bulletin 
No.  173. 


1918.1  PUBLIC  DOCmiEXT  — No.  31.  21a 


DEPARTMENT  OF  AGRICULTURE. 


E.  F.  GASKILL. 


The  work  of  the  agricultural  department  has  been  continued 
during  the  past  year  along  the  same  general  lines  followed  in 
previous  years.  A  large  share  of  the  experimental  work  of  this 
department  has  to  do  with  the  study  of  different  phases  of  the 
question  of  soil  fertility.  This  necessitates  the  care  and  man- 
agement of  a  large  number  of  field  plots.  This  year  the  work 
has  involved  the  use  of  230  field  plots,  13  orchard  plots,  23 
pasture  plots,  143  closed  plots  and  432  pots  in  our  vegetation 
experiments. 

No  experimental  work  has  been  started  on  the  newly  acquired 
Tillson  farm,  as  the  buildings  there  are  not  suitable  for  storage. 
The  crops  grown  on  this  farm  this  year  were  "war  emergency 
crops"  and  hay.  Four  varieties  of  winter  wheat  were  sown  this 
fall  to  determine  whether  any  of  these  varieties  are  suitable  for 
this  section. 

The  supervision  of  the  field  work  on  the  Tuxbury  land,  on 
which  are  set  about  1,100  trees  to  be  used  for  experimental  work, 
also  comes  under  this  department. 

The  work  of  the  agricultural  department  as  set  forth  from 
year  to  year  in  the  annual  reports  may  be  considered  a  report 
of  progress.  No  attempt  is  made  to  report  in  full  all  the  ac- 
tivities of  the  department,  but  to  mention  only  a  few  of  the 
more  important  lines  of  investigation.  The  same  policy  will  be 
followed  this  year. 

Field  A,  or  the  Nitrogen  Experiment. 

The  experiment  has  been  continued  for  twenty-eight  years, 

and  has  had  for  its  object  the  determination  of  the  relative 

value  as  sources  of  nitrogen  of  barnyard  manure,  nitrate  of  soda, 

sulfate  of  ammonia  and  dried  blood;    also  the  effect  on  the  no- 


22  a 


EXPERIMENT  STATION. 


[Jan. 


nitrogen  plots  of  turning  under  the  roots  and  stubble  of  a 
leguminous  crop.  The  field  was  divided  in  1909,  and  half  of 
each  plot  received  an  application  of  lime  at  the  rate  of  2^  tons 
per  acre;  again,  in  1913,  the  same  half  of  each  plot  received  an 
application  of  lime  at  the  rate  of  2  tons  per  acre.  The  crops 
since  liming  have  been:  1909,  clover;  1910,  clover;  1911,  corn 
followed  by  clover;  1912,  corn  followed  by  clover;  1913,  Jap- 
anese millet;  1914,  oats,  grass  and  clover;  1915,  grass  and 
clover;   1916,  Japanese  millet. 

This   year   the   crop   was   Green   Mountain   potatoes.     The 
yields  on  the  different  plots  are  shown  in  the  following  table:  — 


Potatoes. 


Fertilizer. 

Ferti- 
lizer 
per 
Acre 
(Pounds). 

Yields  per  .\cre  (Bushels). 

Plot 

LIMED. 

fNLIMED. 

Large. 

Small. 

Total. 

Large. 

Small. 

Total. 

0 

.1 

I 

I 
e! 

[ 

'! 

r 
I 

»{ 

.ol 

[ 

Stable  manure, ' 

Nitrate  of  soda. 
Muriate  of  potash. 
Dissolved  boneblack. 

Nitrate  of  soda. 

Sulfate  of  potash-magnesia. 

Dissolved  boneblack. 

Dried  blood. 
Muriate  of  potash. 
Dissolved  boneblack. 

Sulfate  of  potash-magnesia, 
Dissolved  boneblack. 

Sulfate  of  ammonia, 
.Sulfate  of  potash-magnesia. 
Dissolved  boneblack. 

Sulfate  of  ammonia, 
Muriate  of  potash. 
Dissolved  boneblack. 

Muriate  of  potash. 
Dissolved  boneblack, 

Sulfate  of  ammonia. 
Muriate  of  potash. 
Dissolved  boneblack, 

Muriate  of  potash. 
Dissolved  boneblack. 

Dried  blood. 

Sulfate  of  potash-magnesia. 

Dissolved  boneblack. 

8,000 

290 'i 
150  ■ 
500  J 

290] 
300  \ 
500  J 

525] 
1.50  [ 
500  J 

300  1 
500] 

225] 
300  '• 
500  J 

225] 
150  \ 
500  J 

150  1 
500  J 

225] 
150 
500  J 

1501 
500/ 

525] 
300  !• 
500  J 

345.00 
333  33 

379.67 

328.67 
343.17 
310.67 

284.25 
300.42 
308.50 
292.17 
318.83 

27.67 
35.33 

34  33 

28.00 
16.67 
19.00 

24.00 
24.67 
21.33 
24.08 
31.67 

372.67 
368.67 

414.00 

356.67 
3.59.83 
329.67 

308.25 
325.08 
329.83 
316.25 
349.50 

227.33 

242.67 

299.00 

285.67 
256.33 
209.33 

227.67 
139  50 
200  17 
152.50 
271.67 

21.67 
21.00 

24.67 

16  67 
14.00 
15  83 

20.50 
22.00 
18.25 
19.17 
17.25 

249  00 
263 . 67 

323.67 

302  33 
270  33 
225.17 

248,17 
161  50 
218.42 
171  67 
288.92 

1  To  equalize  the  nitrogen,  phosphoric  acid  and  potash,  this  plot  received  in  addition  to  the 
manure:  — 

Nitrate  of  soda, 110  pounds  per  acre. 

Sulfate  of  potash-magnesia, 150  pounds  per  acre. 

Dissolved  boneblack 380  pounds  per  acre. 


1918.]  PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  23a 

The  tubers  were  examined  closely  for  scab  at  the  time  of  dig- 
ging. On  the  limed  area  of  all  plots  there  v\-ere  some  scabby 
tubers,  but  not  enough  to  seriously  affect  the  yield  of  merchant- 
able potatoes  except  on  plots  0  and  10.  On  plot  0  about  75  per 
cent,  of  the  potatoes  were  scabby,  and  on  plot  10  about  50  per 
cejit.  were  scabby.  On  the  unlimed  area  of  the  different  plots 
there  was  no  scab  at  all  except  on  plots  0  and  1.  On  these 
about  10  per  cent,  of  the  tubers  were  scabby.  The  tubers  on 
the  unlimed  areas  were  smaller,  smoother  and  of  better  quality 
than  those  on  the  limed  areas,  but  the  yield  was  greater  in  each 
case  on  the  limed  areas. 

Field  B,  Comparison  of  Muriate  and  High-grade  Sulfate 

OF  Potash. 

In  this  experiment,  which  has  continued  for  twenty-five  years, 
a  great  variety  of  crops  has  been  grown.  The  results  obtained 
under  our  climatic  and  soil  conditions  show  that  muriate  has 
proved  the  better  source  of  potash  for  the  following:  asparagus 
(eleven  years);  currants  (four  years);  mangels  (two  years); 
sugar  beets  (one  year);  corn,  ensilage  (one  year);  corn  stover 
(seven  years);  sweet  corn  stover  (one  year);  squashes  (three 
years);  carrots  (two  years);  onions  (two  years);  celery  (one 
year);  oat  hay  (one  year);  vetch  and  oats  (two  years);  and 
alfalfa  (one  year). 

The  high-grade  sulfate  has  proved  the  better  source  for  the 
following:  asparagus  (one  year);  blackberries  (eleven  years); 
raspberries  (eleven  years) ;  strawberries  (eleven  years) ;  rhubarb 
(twelve  years);  potatoes  (twelve  years);  corn,  grain  (eight 
years);  corn  stover  (one  year);  sweet  corn,  ears  (one  year); 
cabbages  (ten  years);  soy  beans  (five  years);  alfalfa  (four 
j^ears);  crimson  clover  (one  year);  medium  red  clover  (one 
year);  alsike  clover  (one  year);  common  red  and  alsike  clover 
(one  year);   and  mammoth  red  clover  (one  year). 

The  crops  grown  this  year  were:  alfalfa,  blackberries,  cur- 
rants, gooseberries,  mangels,  rhubarb,  raspberries  and  soy  beans. 
The  results  obtained  are  in  accordance  with  those  obtained  in 
previous  years,  with  the  exception  of  raspberries.  This  year  the 
better  yield  of  raspberries  was  obtained  on  the  muriate  plot. 


24  a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 

Field  C,  Chemical  Fertilizers  and  Manure  for  Market- 
garden  Crops. 
In  this  experiment,  which  has  continued  for  twenty-seven 
years,  we  have  grown  practically  all  of  the  market-garden  crops 
common  in  this  State.  The  object  of  the  experiment  has  been 
to  determine  the  effect  of  the  addition  to  manure  of  chemical 
fertilizers  for  these  crops;  also  to  compare  three  materials  as 
sources  of  nitrogen  and  two  as  sources  of  potash.  The  results 
obtained  this  year  are  shown  in  the  following  table :  — 


1918. 


PUBLIC  DOCIjTVIENT  — No.  31. 


25  a 


,- 

:c 

o 

lO 

o 

CO 

to 

o 

•«■ 

c; 

.§ 

-O 

■o 

I^ 

o 

to 

OO 

OD 

i      S 

o 

-^ 

X 

'c 

»— ' 

CO 

CO 

M 

CJ 

^ 

s 

a 

1       X 

z 

■d 

CO 

(M 

to 

■n 

■* 

GJ 

(T: 

o 

»c 

z 

s 

CO 

O 

CO 

<M 

CO 

CO 

O 

3 

"»f 

o 

t^ 

O 

CI 

>o 

0. 

o 

■* 

M* 

Tl 

M<_ 

t^ 

>a 

OO 

H 

co" 

1^ 

co' 

o" 

00~ 

oo" 

^ 

d 

•— < 

c^ 

c^ 

C>J 

» 

s 

3 

z 

p 

O 

t^ 

c-l 

lO 

CO 

C-J 

OS 

CO 

!r. 

■   o 

cc 

"*. 

t^ 

to 

L-i 

T-H 

a 

o 

c<r 

o 

•^* 

o" 

o 

C-" 

c^ 

z 

r- 

lO 

•* 

iO 

.    & 

i     0 

PH 

te 

H 

o 

CJ 

r^ 

"5 

2 

CO 

M< 

to 

o 

s 

o" 

o 

o' 

c^" 

cT 

°^_ 

Q 

^ 

00 

o 

o 

o 

o 

CO 

lO 

»c 

to 

o 

in 

C^I 

§ 

CD 

o 
o" 

co_ 

to_ 
o 

5C 

o 

tf 

to 

03 

OO 

t^ 

to 

1? 

00 

«o 

CO 

to 

•* 

-V 

CO 

CO 

i^ 

o 

ej  C 

50_ 

OO 

>o 

CO 

II 

^ 

o 

^ 

(^ 

(^ 

^ 

ud' 

■* 

to 

•o 

to 

•o 

S";^ 

"1 

•* 

o 

CO 

•^ 

OO 

o 

C-J 

Ol 

Ci 

00 

to 

CO 

t.  a 

t^ 

o_ 

o_ 

co_ 

c!   3 

to" 

co" 

t^ 

to" 

to" 

«)" 

tc 

M 

1 

■*  OO 

tooo 

ooo 

■♦  OO 

tooo 

ooo 

S^^i 

t^OC^ 

■*  oc^ 

OOM 

t^OCM 

•^  o  c^ 

CO  ^  CO 

CO^H  CO 

Tjl  rt  CO 

co^co 

eo-^co 

•*  — CO 

« 

s 

J 

s 

« 

w 

^ 

2     -S 

^ 

^ 

-r    -^ 

// 

^ 

a 

C3        o 

o 

c  jn^ 

^^ 

'^^ 

c  „-i2 

-d 

>  a 

ei  *  £ 

^■S-o 

-•S2 

-^s 

N 

iai 

oo'S 

o-o-S 

5-2  > 
ca.S'o 

O    OJ    > 

^  o  > 

■g.cS-O 

■a  .So 
^  n  M 

^^1 

SSI 

III 

i 

IIq 

g|5 

■n  3.2 
QSQ 

"3  "31^ 

glo 

PmQ 

. . - 

. . . 

^— ^-^ 

, ^ . 

o 

o 

'H 

c^ 

CO 

■* 

«o 

to 

p. 

26  a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 


Field  G,  Comparison  of  Potash  Salts. 
This  is  the  twentieth  year  of  the  experiment  which  has  had 
for  its  object  the  comparison  of  seven  different  materials  that 
may  be  used  as  sources  of  potash.  There  are  40  plots  in  all, 
including  5  check  or  no-potash  plots  and  5  plots  on  which 
each  of  the  different  potash  materials  are  used.  The  rate  of 
application  of  actual  potash  has  been  in  previous  years  135 
pounds  of  potassium  oxide  per  acre;  this  year  the  application 
was  reduced  to  75  pounds.  The  different  materials  furnishing 
potash  are:  kainit,  high-grade  sulfate  of  potash,  low-grade  sul- 
fate of  potash,  muriate  of  potash,  nitrate  of  potash,  carbonate 
of  potash  and  treater  dust.  All  plots  receive  annually  the  fol- 
lowing mixture  supplying  nitrogen  and  phosphoric  acid:  — 

Pounds 
per  Acre. 

Nitrate  of  soda,^ 250 

Tankage, 270 

Acid  phosphate, 360 

In  1915  all  plots  received  the  usual  application  of  nitrogen 
and  phosphoric  acid,  but  no  potash.  This  year  all  plots  re- 
ceived the  usual  application  of  nitrogen  and  phosphoric  acid, 
and  all  except  the  fourth  series  (plots  25-32)  received  the 
application  of  potash.  On  this  set  of  plots  the  potash  was 
omitted. 

The  crop  this  ,year  was  Early  Canada  Flint  corn,  which,  ow- 
ing to  the  late  season,  was  not  planted  until  June  22.  The 
yield  per  acre  of  the  different  plots  is  shown  in  the  following 
table :  — 

'  Plots  6,  14,  22,  30  and  38,  which  receive  nitrate  of  potash,  receive  only  enough  nitrate  of 
soda  to  make  up  the  deficiency  in  nitrate,  —  this  year,  108  pounds  per  acre. 


1918. 


PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31. 


27  a 


^ 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

S 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

00 

QC 

o 

to 

00 

o^ 

<m" 

•^ 

o 

vo" 

to 

lO 

tn 

■^ 

sJ: 

•c 

o 

t^ 

„ 

^ 

■«< 

r>. 

,^ 

0  S3 

CI 

=2 

CO 

_; 

uo 

lO 

t^ 

lO 

CO 

lO 

>o 

to 

U5 

UO 

rr 

> 

^ 

o 

n 

>o 

to 

Ci 

o 

E 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

■^ 

^ 

3   3 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

Q 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

■^_ 

<» 

to 

00 

00 

ckT 

CO 

CO 

CO 

-1." 

■^ 

CO- 

CO 

c 

„J. 

■* 

o 

OJ 

t^ 

^J 

C-J 

CO 

lO 

o 

to 

'T 

o 

•^ 

■^ 

>o 

w 

CO 

^ 

„ 

„ 

_ 

_ 

_ 

O 

« 

to 

t>. 

00 

05 

o 

^^ 

Ol 

E 

" 

'^ 

M 

N 

C-1 

CO 

CO 

CO 

^ 



|| 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

«- 

CO 

s 

CO 

to 

CO 

^-^ 

sj:    ■ 

o 

to 

o 

CO 

CO 

to 

o 

■* 

• 

urn's 

''t* 

00 

") 

C-J 

-« 

to 

CO 

CO 

^ 

■* 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

•^ 

^ 

*- 
» 

0 

t^ 

00 

05 

o 

CO 

^ 

'" 

" 

"■ 

C-1 

c^ 

c^^ 

?!, 

JP 

If 

2 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

'^ 

cc 

o 

to 

C^i 

to 

00_ 

o 

iC 

CO 

wT 

■*'■ 

-* 

TH" 

CO 

TjT 

« 

•—^ 

^- 

r* 

n 

—  ^ 

•^ 

3D 

o 

r^ 

r^ 

to 

00 

o 

^ 

0   3^ 

UO 

to 

CO 

s 

00 

ib 

o 

^■ 

_o 

CS 

o 

— 

■M 

CO 

M< 

•o 

to 

■■^ 

^ 

°   3 

§ 

o 
o 

§ 

o 
o 

o 
o 

o 
o 

o 

§ 

"^ 

to 

c^ 

C>1_ 

to_ 

00 

00_ 

CO 

•^ 

iO 

•^ 

io" 

•^ 

■* 

CO 

^^ 

-  ^ 

_ 

r^ 

„ 

1^ 

-.*< 

o 

-»< 

o 

0   3^ 

r^ 

Si 

w^ 

^ 

Ci 

^, 

CO 

o 

•o 

iO 

o 

to 

>o 

to 

to 

^ 

_o 

'^ 

C) 

CO 

•* 

>o 

to 

t^ 

CO 

^^ 

cT 

o 

< 

H 

C3 

0 

3 

"3 

^ 

o 

•a 

o 

3 

i1 
g. 
o 

2; 

'3 

■3 

3 

o 

C3 

o 

-a 
s 

H     L 

28  a 


EXPERIMENT  STATION, 


[Jan. 


Comparison  of  Different  Phosphates. 

This  experiment  was  begun  in  1897,  and  has  for  its  object  a 
comparison  of  ten  different  materials  that  may  be  used  as 
sources  of  phosphoric  acid.  The  data  for  the  first  eighteen  years 
of  the  experiment  were  published  in  Experiment  Station  Bulle- 
tin No.  162. 

The  materials  furnishing  phosphoric  acid  are  applied  in  suffi- 
cient quantity'  to  supply  96  pounds  per  acre  of  actual  phosphoric 
acid.  Each  plot  receives  an  annual  application  of  the  following 
mixture  furnishing  nitrogen  and  potash:  — 

Pounds 
per  Acre. 

High-grade  sulfate  of  potash, 160 

Nitrate  of  soda, 364 

Sulfate  of  ammonia, 100 

Hoof  meal,i 102 

The  crop  this  year  was  Medium  Green  soy  beans.  Owing  to 
an  early  frost  the  crop  did  not  yield  as  well  as  usual.  The  fol- 
lowing table  gives  the  results  obtained :  — 


(Soy  Beans  (Yields  per  Acre). 


Plot. 


Phosph.\te. 


Beans 
(Bushels). 


Straw 
(Pounds). 


No  phosphate, 
Arkansas  rock  phosphate, 
South  Carolina  rock, 
Florida  soft  rock,    . 

Slag 

Tennessee  rock, 
No  phosphate. 
Dissolved  boneblack, 
Raw  bone. 

Dissolved  bone  meal. 
Steamed  bone. 
Acid  phosphate, 
No  phosphate. 


16.66 
16.86 
13.00 
15.34 
18.48 
15.17 
17.86 
18.97 
18.55 
18.93 
17.69 
19.00 
18.58 


4,234 
4,222 
3,526 
3,750 
6,848 
3,640 
5,044 
5,060 
5,444 
5.062 
4,974 
4,498 
3,322 


1  Plots  9,  10  and  11,  which  receive  phosphoric  acid  in  some  form  of  bone,  receive  only  enough 
hoof  meal  to  equalize  the  organic  nitrogen. 


1918.1  PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  29o 


North  Corn  Acre. 

For  twenty-seven  years  there  have  been  under  comparison  on 
this  field  two  fertihzer  mixtures.  In  one,  the  percentage  of 
potash  is  high  and  that  of  phosphoric  acid  low;  in  the  other 
(which  represents  about  the  average  analysis  of  the  commercial 
corn  fertilizers  offered  on  our  markets)  the  percentage  of  phos- 
phoric acid  is  high  and  that  of  potash  low.  For  twenty-one 
years  the  rotation  on  this  field  has  been  two  years  grass  and 
two  years  corn.  The  seed  (a  mixture  of  timothy,  red  top  and 
clover)  has  usually  been  sown  in  the  standing  corn  the  latter 
part  of  July.  The  soil  has  not  had  the  benefit  of  a  green 
manure  crop  nor  an  application  of  manure  during  the  twenty- 
six  years  of  the  experiment.  The  turf  and  corn  stubble  which 
have  been  plowed  under  have  been  the  only  source  of  humus. 

This  year  potash  was  omitted  from  the  mixture  containing 
the  lower  amount  and  cut  down  in  the  mixture  containing  the 
larger  amount,  so  that  plots  1  and  3  this  year  received  no 
potash,  and  plots  2  and  4  received  potash  at  the  rate  of  160 
pounds  of  muriate  per  acre  instead  of  250  pounds  per  acre  as 
in  previous  years. 

The  crop  this  year  was  mixed  grass  and  clover.  The  results 
obtained  are  in  accordance  with  those  of  previous  years,  viz., 
the  combination  containing  the  larger  per  cent,  of  potash  gives 
the  larger  yield  of  hay. 

North  Soil  Test. 

This  is  the  twenty-eighth  year  of  this  experiment,  which  has 
for  its  object  a  study  of  the  effect  of  the  continued  use  of 
fertilizers  containing  single  plant-food  elements  and  different 
combinations  of  plant-food  elements  for  different  crops;  also 
the  effect  of  lime  added  to  each  fertilizer  under  comparison. 

The  west  half  of  each  plot  received  an  application  of  hydrated 
lime  at  the  rate  of  1  ton  per  acre  in  1899  and  again  in  1904,  and 
at  the  rate  of  one-half  ton  per  acre  in  1907.  In  1916,  2  tons 
per  acre  of  ground  limestone  were  applied. 

The  crop  this  year  was  cabbages.  The  following  table  gives 
the  yields  per  acre  and  the  fertilizer  schedule:  — 


30  a 


EXPERIMENT  STATION. 


[Jan. 


Cabbages. 


These  results  are  in  accordance  with  those  of  earlier  years 
when  a  crucifer  has  been  the  crop.  The  largest  yields  are  ob- 
tained where  the  mixtures  containing  phosphoric  acid  are  used> 
and  on  all  plots  except  where  the  phosphoric  acid  is  used  alone 
an  application  of  lime  increases  the  yield. 


South  Soil  Test. 

This  experiment  was  begun  in  1889,  and  has  for  its  object  a 
study  of  the  effect  of  the  continued  use  of  fertilizers  containing 
single  plant-food  elements  and  different  combinations  of  plant- 
food  elements  for  different  crops.  The  whole  field  received  an 
application  of  lime  at  the  rate  of  1  ton  per  a^re  in  1899  and 
again  in  1904,  at  the  rate  of  one-half  ton  per  acre  in  1907,  and 
of  ground  limestone  at  the  rate  of  2  tons  per  acre  in  1916. 

The  following  table  shows  the  yields  per  acre  of  corn  and 
stover  obtained  on  the  different  plots  in  1917  and  1915.     The 


1918. 


PUBLIC   DOCUMENT  —  No.  31. 


31a 


increase  in  yield  in  1917  over  that  in  1915  may  be  due  to  the 
fact  that  the  variety  grown  in  1917  was  Early  Canada,  and 
that  grown  in  1915  was  Longfellow;  or  it  may  be  due  to  the 
fact  that  a  crop  of  sweet  clover  was  plowed  under  in  the  spring 
of  1917;  or  it  may  be  due  to  a  combination  of  these  two  factors. 


Fertilizer 
per 

Yields  per  Acre. 

Plot. 

Fertilizer. 

1917. 1 

1915. = 

(Pounds). 

Corn 
(Bushels). 

Stover 
(Pounds). 

Corn 
(Bushels). 

Stover 
(Pounds). 

1 

Nitrate  of  soda, 

160 

34  2 

1,900 

22.86 

1,490 

2 

Dissolved  boneblack, 

320 

18.1 

1,600 

10.00 

760 

3 

No  fertilizer,  . 

- 

12.7 

2,400 

8.50 

615 

4 

Muriate  of  potash, 

160 

40,9 

3,300 

40.86 

1,980 

5 

Lime, 

800 

13  8 

1,700 

5.29 

635 

6 

No  fertilizer,  . 

- 

13.9 

1,500 

10.93 

720 

7 

Manure, 

30,000 

40.8 

5,200 

60.79 

3,520 

,.{ 

Nitrate  of  soda. 
Muriate  of  potash. 

160  \ 

160  1 

46.1 

3,500 

34  35 

3,385 

■■I 

Dissolved  boneblack. 
Muriate  of  potash. 

320  1 

160  1 

46  3 

3,300 

37.58 

3,250 

12 

No  fertilizer,  . 

- 

15  7 

2,100 

16.50 

960 

13 

Plaster,   . 

800 

21.7 

1,400 

10.92 

805 

f 
[ 

Nitrate  of  soda, 
Dissolved  boneblack. 
Muriate  of  potash. 

160  1 
320  :■ 

160  J 

36.0 

5,400 

35  15 

3,400 

'  After  plowing  under  a  crop  of  sweet  clover. 
•  Before  plowing  under  a  crop  of  sweet  clover. 

Grass  Plots. 
The  experiment  in  top-dressing  permanent  mowings  with 
different  materials  used  in  rotation  has  been  continued,  but 
owing  to  the  scarcity  of  potash  this  material  was  not  applied 
the  past  season.  In  the  following  table  will  be  found  the 
fertilizer  schedule  and  the  yields  per  acre  obtained  on  each  for 
this  vear :  — 


Fertilizers. 


Hay 

(Pounds). 


Rowen 
(Pounds) 


Total 
(Pounds). 


Barnyard  manure,  .... 

Bone  and  potash, '         .        .        .        . 
Slag  and  potash '  (earlier  ashes  plot),    . 


3,741 

2,718 
1,422 


1,487 

1,031 

907 


5,228 
3,749 
2,328 


'  No  potash  was  applied  in  1916  or  1917 


32  a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 

The  average  yields  to  date  under  the  three  systems  of  top- 
dressing  are :  — 

Pounds 
per  Acre. 

Wlien  top-dressed  with  manure, 6,006 

When  top-dressed  with  bone  and  potash, 5,824 

When  top-dressed  with  wood  ashes  (slag  and  potash  now  used) ,     .    5,496 

The  crop  this  year  before  cutting  gave  the  appearance  of  a 
large  yield,  but  the  weights  show  a  yield  smaller  than  the 
average  under  each  of  the  three  systems  of  manuring. 

Sulfate  of  Ammonia  v.  Nitrate  of  Soda  as  a  Top-dressing 
FOR  Permanent  Mowings. 
This  experiment  has  been  continued  for  ten  years,  and  has 
for  its  object  the  comparison  of  nitrate  of  soda  and  sulfate  of 
ammonia  as  a  top-dressing  for  permanent  mowings.  All  plots 
have  received  an  equal  application  of  potash  and  phosphoric 
acid.  Owing  to  the  scarcity  of  potash,  none  of  this  element  was 
applied  in  1916  or  1917.  With  favorable  weather  for  the  pro- 
duction of  hay  in  1916,  a  normal  crop  was  obtained.  In  1917, 
the  second  year  the  potash  was  omitted,  with  weather  un- 
favorable for  the  production  of  good  hay,  the  crop  fell  much 
below  the  normal. 

Variety  Test  Work. 

The  testing  of  different  varieties  of  potatoes,  alfalfa  and  soy 
beans  has  been  continued  during  the  past  year. 

The  statement  made  last  year  in  regard  to  the  relative  merits 
of  Grimm  and  Common  alfalfa  is  further  substantiated  by  the 
results  obtained  this  year,  viz.,  that  our  results  do  not  show  the 
Grimm  to  be  an}'  better  than  the  Common. 

During  the  past  three  years  we  have  had  under  comparison 
with  some  standard  varieties  several  seedling  potatoes.  None 
of  these  has  given  promise  of  being  any  better  than  the  stand- 
ard varieties. 

The  co-operative  work  with  the  United  States  Department  of 
Agriculture  in  testing  different  varieties  of  soy  beans  has  been 
continued. 

Nine  varieties  of  winter  wheat  were  sown  this  fall,  and  it  is 
planned  to  try  a  few  varieties  of  spring  wheat. 


1918.]  PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  33  a 


DEPARTMENT  OF  BOTANY. 


A.  VINCENT  OSMUN. 


The  activities  of  the  department  of  botany  during  the  last 
year  have  continued  mainly  along  two  lines,  viz.,  plant  pathol- 
ogy and  plant  physiology.  In  addition,  seed  work,  corre- 
spondence and  reorganization  of  the  mycological  collection  have 
demanded  increased  attention  on  the  part  of  the  staff. 

A  survey  of  the  season  of  1917  in  Massachusetts  indicates 
that,  on  the  whole,  conditions  were  somewhat  unfavorable  for 
the  development  of  parasitic  fungi.  A  late,  wet  spring,  followed 
by  a  period  of  drought,  checked  many  diseases  which  early  in 
the  season  had  threatened  serious  loss.  Occasional  short  periods 
of  high  humidity  were  usually  accompanied  by  high  tempera- 
tures, which  prevented  development  of  potato  late  blight,  and 
were  followed  by  unusually  bright  weather  not  favorable  to 
uninterrupted  development  of  other  diseases. 

Early  blight  of  potato  inflicted  more  than  the  usual  amount 
of  damage  before  being  checked  by  the  dry  weather  of  July. 
The  tendency  on  the  part  of  potato  growers  to  delay  the  first 
application  of  Bordeaux  mixture  was  responsible  for  much  of 
the  injury  from  this  source.  The  first  application,  when  the 
plants  are  not  over  6  to  8  inches  high,  is  one  of  the  most  im- 
portant in  the  spraying  schedule,  as  it  is  at  this  stage  more  than 
any  other  that  a  coating  of  the  fungicide  on  the  foliage  is 
needed  to  prevent  the  early  and  late  blight  fungi  from  obtain- 
ing a  start  in  the  tissues.  Late  blight  of  potato  was  severe  in 
the  island  counties  and  along  the  coast,  owing  to  the  continued 
high  humidity  throughout  the  season,  the  normal  condition  in 
that  part  of  the  State.  The  disease  was  present  at  scattered 
points  in  other  parts  of  the  State,  but  in  few  instances  was  in- 
jury to  the  vines  sufficient  to  cause  alarm.     Later,  however, 


34a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 

this  disease  caused  much  rotting  of  tubers,  owing  to  the  wet 
condition  of  the  soil,  and  the  loss  from  this  source  among  stored 
potatoes  has  been  heavy.  This  condition  is  likely  to  seriously 
affect  the  quality  of  seed  potatoes  next  spring.  Potato  scab 
was  more  prevalent  than  during  the  preceding  few  years,  per- 
haps in  part  because  of  the  greater  number  of  amateur  growers 
and  the  poor  "seed"  planted.  Rhizoctonia  of  potato,  though 
common,  did  relatively  little  damage.  "Seed"  disinfection  as 
partial  insurance  against  scab  and  Rhizoctonia  is  now  generally 
practiced  by  experienced  growers. 

Bean  anthracnose  was  everywhere  in  evidence  on  seedling 
plants  early  in  the  summer,  but  for  the  most  part,  owing  to  the 
dry  period  which  followed,  the  disease  did  not  progress,  and 
was  serious  on  the  pods  only  in  wet  locations  and  in  the  island 
counties.  Field  experiments  conducted  by  the  department  to 
determine  the  efficacy  of  various  fungicidal  spraying  materials 
against  this  disease  were  without  determinable  results  because 
of  failure  of  the  disease  to  develop.  Stem  and  root  rots  of 
beans,  caused  by  Fusarium  and  Rhizoctonia  were  of  more  fre- 
quent occurrence  than  usual,  especially  on  wet  and  sour  soils. 
These  diseases  present  control  problems  of  considerable  im- 
portance, and  should  receive  attention  in  the  near  future. 

The  onion  crop  suffered  from  a  Macrosporium  blight  of  the 
tops  and  Botrytis  and  bacterial  rot  of  the  bulbs,  all  of  which 
apparently  found  favorable  environment  in  the  hot,  wet  period 
of  August.  The  crop  continued  to  rot  badly  in  storage.  The 
plans  of  the  department  include  active  investigation  of  onion 
diseases  in  1918. 

Fruit  crops  were  as  a  rule  freer  than  usual  from  disease. 
Peach  leaf  curl  was,  however,  somewhat  more  abundant,  though 
usually  on  trees  not  receiving  a  dormant  spray.  It  is  hoped 
that  more  growers  in  this  State  will  adopt  the  practice  of  ap- 
plying the  dormant  spray  in  the  fall.  This  has  proved  success- 
ful where  tried,  and  has  several  advantages  over  early  spring 
spraying.  When  left  until  late  winter  or  early  spring  there  is 
always  danger  that  a  warm  period  may  send  the  leaf  curl 
fungus  into  the  bud  tissues  beyond  reach  of  the  fungicide,  and 
this  probably  explains  occasional  failures  to  control  the  disease 
by  dormant  spraying. 


1918.]  PUBLIC   DOCmiENT  — No.  31.  35  a 

Sweet  cherries  suffered  severely  from  brown  rot,  but  this 
disease  caused  little  damage  to  plums  and  peaches,  except  as  it 
followed  hail  injury,  when  the  loss  from  rotting  became  very 
heavy. 

Two  heavy  hail  storms,  one  in  the  latter  part  of  July,  the 
other  early  in  August,  seriously  damaged  fruit  and  tobacco  in 
the  Connecticut  Valley  and  vicinity. 

Apples  and  pears  suffered  comparatively  little  from  disease. 
Mcintosh  and  Fameuse  were,  in  some  orchards,  badly  scabbed. 
Our  observations  seem  to  indicate  that  there  are  individual 
cases  of  extreme  susceptibility  to  scab  among  trees  of  these 
varieties,  and  that  in  such  cases  the  usual  fungicidal  applica- 
tions are  insufficient  to  control  the  disease.  Bitter-pit  and 
fruit-spot  were  much  less  serious  than  in  1917,  although  both 
were  of  more  frequent  occurrence  than  usual. 

Truck  crop  growers  in  the  vicinity  of  Boston  were  heavy 
losers  from  downy  mildew  of  cucumbers,  which  was  severe  both 
under  glass  and  out  of  doors.  Preliminary  experimental  spray- 
ing of  greenhouse  cucumbers  for  the  control  of  this  disease  gave 
promising  results.    The  work  will  be  continued. 

Celery,  especially  the  Golden  Self-Blanching  variety,  was  al- 
most a  complete  failure  on  some  truck  crop  farms,  owing  to  the 
severity  of  crown-rot  and  heart-rot.  Growers  are  substituting 
other  varieties  because  of  the  susceptibility  of  this  variety  to 
these  bacterial  diseases.  However,  owing  to  the  desirable  quali- 
ties of  Golden  Self-Blanching,  an  effort  is  being  made,  through 
selection  of  resistant  plants,  to  develop  a  strain  of  this  variety 
immune  to  these  diseases.  Early  and  late  blight  of  celery  in- 
flicted but  slight  damage.  This  condition  made  very  uncertain 
and  unsatisfactory  the  results  obtained  from  spraying  with  a 
number  of  fungicides  on  experimental  plots  located  on  three 
truck  crop  farms.  This  experiment  will  be  repeated  in  1918 
with  some  modifications. 

Heavy  frost  in  September  sevci'ely  injured  many  crops.  A 
large  percentage  of  field  corn  failed  to  mature  properly,  and 
fodder  corn  was  greatly  reduced  in  feeding  value.  Injury  to 
beans  and  potatoes  was  relatively  small  in  most  sections. 

Although  a  record  number  of  reports  of  the  occurrence  of 
plant  diseases  in  the  State  was  received,  and  correspondence 


36  a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 

was  accordingly  heavier  than  usual,  this  cannot  be  interpreted 
as  indicating  an  abnormal  season.  It  is  explained,  rather,  by 
the  war-time  impetus  given  to  gardening  and  general  crop  pro- 
duction by  the  publicity  campaign  waged  in-  the  State  and 
throughout  the  country.  Many  reports  were  followed  up  only 
to  find  slight  and  isolated  outbreaks  of  diseases.  However,  an 
awakened  interest  is  indicated,  and  through  it  much  may  be 
accomplished  in  the  way  of  suppression  of  diseases  by  education 
of  the  public  in  the  use  of  known  methods  of  control. 

While  this  is  recognized  as  extension  work,  it  has  always  been 
conducted  by  the  station  staff  because  there  has  been  no  one 
specially  assigned  to  act  as  extension  plant  pathologist.  How- 
ever, on  November  1  Mr.  W.  L.  Doran  was  appointed  by  the 
United  States  Department  of  Agriculture  as  extension  specialist 
in  diseases  of  truck  crops,  to  work  in  co-operation  with  the  de- 
partment of  botany.  This  arrangement  will  relieve  station 
members  of  the  department  of  much  correspondence,  and  they 
should  hereafter  be  able  to  give  correspondingly  more  time  to 
research.  It  will  also  enlarge  the  usefulness  of  extension  work 
in  plant  pathology,  and  help  to  bring  the  department  into  closer 
touch  with  the  problems  of  a  larger  number  of  growers. 

The  possibilities  of  research  in  plant  pathology  have  been 
greatly  enlarged  by  the  addition  of  a  field  pathologist  to  the 
department  staff.  Formerly  the  amount  of  field  work  in  path- 
ological research  which  could  be  undertaken  has  been  small, 
owing  to  the  great  amount  of  other  work  required  of  the  de- 
partment. This  year  spraying  experiments  on  beans  and  celery 
were  conducted  in  Amherst  and  Arlington,  the  latter  in  co-op- 
eration with  the  market-garden  field  station.  In  addition,  in- 
vestigations on  diseases  of  lettuce  and  cucumbers  were  started 
in  the  greenhouses  of  several  truck  crop  growers  in  Arlington 
and  in  the  department  greenhouse  at  Amherst.  This  feature  of 
our  work  will  be  enlarged  the  coming  year. 

Extensive  research  on  a  new  canker  disease  of  roses,  caused 
by  the  fungus  Cylindrocladium  scoparium  Morg.,  has  been  under 
way  for  about  a  year,  and  results  will  be  ready  for  early  publica- 
tion. This  work  was  undertaken  at  the  request  of  one  of  the 
largest  growers  of  greenhouse  roses  in  New  England,  who  placed 
his  equipment  at  our  disposal  for  the  carrying  out  of  the  more 


191S.]  PUBLIC   DOCITINIENT  — No.  31.  37a 

practical  features  of  the  investigation.  It  is  believed  that  a 
satisfactory  means  of  controlling  the  disease  has  been  worked 
out. 

For  several  years  a  disease  of  lawn  grass,  which  is  evidenced 
by  the  dying  of  the  grass  in  round  areas  a  foot  or  more  in  diam- 
eter, has  been  under  observation.  Repeated  attempts  to  de- 
termine the  cause  of  this  trouble  had  failed  to  connect  any 
pathogenic  organism  with  it  until  last  summer,  when  our  efforts 
were  rewarded  by  the  isolation  of  a  fungus  which  we  have  since 
proved  to  be  the  causal  agent  of  the  disease.  The  fungus  proves 
to  be  an  unnamed  species  of  Sclerotium,  and  will  be  named  and 
described  in  a  later  publication.  Control  measures  are  under 
investigation. 

Investigations  on  rust  of  Antirrhinum,  a  serious  disease  of 
this  floral  crop  both  in  the  greenhouse  and  out  of  doors,  have 
established  a  method  of  control  under  glass,  and  results  will  be 
presented  for  publication  at  an  early  date. 

The  complete  results  of  the  investigations  on  mosaic  disease 
of  tobacco  were  published  in  a  bulletin  issued  during  the  year. 
On  the  completion  of  this  work  G.  H.  Chapman  was  assigned 
to  a  new  project  for  the  study  of  so-called  "tobacco-sick  soils," 
referred  to  in  our  last  annual  report.^  This  project  has  been 
established  on  an  experimental  basis.  Three  plots  for  study  of 
fertilizer  and  soil  reactions,  and  one  for  chemical  treatment  of 
soil  infected  with  the  root-rot  fungus  {Thielaxia  hasicola  (B.  & 
Br.)  Zoff),  were  conducted  during  last  summer.  Many  soil 
samples  have  been  taken  for  laboratory  tests  and  much  data 
gathered  on  various  factors.  Physiological  studies  of  Thielavia 
are  being  made  with  a  view  to  establishing  a  soil  reaction  favor- 
able to  the  development  of  tobacco  and  unfavorable  to  the 
fungus.  This  work  has  awakened  keen  interest  on  the  part  of 
tobacco  growers,  who  are  more  than  ever  looking  to  the  station 
for  help  in  solving  some  of  their  important  problems. 

The  project  for  the  study  of  the  response  of  plants  to  light, 
in  charge  of  O.  L.  Clark,  was  extended  to  include  field  work 
last  summer.  A  number  of  crops  were  grown  under  cloth  of 
different  textures  which  cut  off  varying  amounts  of  light,  with 
a  suitable  check  plot  in  the  open.    The  tents  were  so  designed 

>  Twenty-ninth  annual  report,  Mass.  Agr.  Expt.  Sta.,  1917,  p.  63o. 


38  a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 

as  to  insure  only  slight  variations  from  normal  of  temperature 
and  humidity.  Preliminary  results  indicate  that  much  of  value 
may  be  expected  from  this  feature  of  the  investigation.  In  the 
greenhouse  a  study  of  the  energy  of  assimilation  under  varying 
light  intensities  is  being  conducted.  A  method  of  obtaining  a 
measure  of  total  daily  light  also  is  under  experimentation. 
Fundamental  to  the  main  problem,  much  work  has  been  done 
in  the  laboratory  on  the  response  of  stomata  to  changes  in  light 
intensity  and  light  quality. 

The  number  of  seed  samples  received  for  purity  and  germina- 
tion tests  showed  an  increase  over  former  years,  and  more  than 
the  usual  number  of  tobacco  seed  was  sent  in  for  cleaning  and 
separation.  At  times  the  facilities  of  the  department  for  doing 
seed  work  have  been  taxed  to  the  limit,  and  should  the  work 
continue  to  grow,  additional  expenditures  for  equipment  and 
help  will  be  necessary. 

In  the  work  of  reorganizing  the  mycological  collection  more 
than  10,000  specimens  have  been  relabeled  and  placed  in  new 
packets  of  uniform  size.  Steel  cases  with  a  capacity  of  about 
9,000  packets  have  been  purchased.  In  order  to  house  the 
complete  collection  under  fireproof  conditions  about  three  more 
cases  should  be  provided.  The  herbarium  is  a  valuable  adjunct 
to  research  in  plant  pathology  and  mycology;  it  could  not  be 
replaced  if  destroyed,  and  should  be  effectually  guarded  against 
fire  and  vermin. 

In  collaboration  with  the  Plant  Disease  Survey  of  the  United 
States  Department  of  Agriculture,  a  survey  of  disease  conditions 
within  the  State  has  been  conducted  for  a  number  of  years. 
This  work  recently  has  been  reorganized  at  Washington,  and  its 
scope  and  usefulness  will  be  greatly  enlarged.  It  must  be 
looked  upon  as  forming  a  foundation  for  future  work  in  plant 
pathology^  and  should  be  given  the  hearty  support  of  the  sta- 
tion. The  writer  frequently  has  urged  the  importance  of  mak- 
ing the  disease  survey  a  regular  station  project,  and  it  is  hoped 
that  financial  as  well  as  moral  support  may  be  given  to  this 
work  in  the  future. 


1918.1  PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  39a 


DEPARTMENT  OF   CHEMISTRY. 


J.  B.  LINDSEY. 


The  work  of  this  department  is  divided  into  three  distinct 
sections,  —  research,  fertilizer,  and  feed  and  dairy. 

1.    Research  Section. 

(a)  During  the  past  year  Dr.  Lindsey  and  Mr.  Beals  have 
conducted  experiments  on  the  nutritive  value  of  alfalfa;  also 
considerable  digestion  work  with  sheep  has  been  completed, 
including  studies  of  the  digestibility  of  Sudan  grass,  vinegar 
grains,  alfalfa,  sweet  clover,  carrots  and  Schumacher's  Stock 
Feed.  Experiments  with  horses  on  the  digestibility  and  avail- 
able energy  in  alfalfa,  corn,  oats,  wheat  bran,  corn  bran,  brew- 
ers' grains,  and  in  rations  compounded  from  the  same,  have 
been  completed,  and  other  similar  trials  are  in  progress.  Studies 
on  the  growth  and  feeding  value  of  sweet  clover  and  of  Sudan 
grass  have  been  made. 

(6)  Dr.  Holland,  assisted  by  Mr.  Buckle}^  reports  that  the 
work  on  esterification  methods  for  determining  different  fatty 
acids  in  butter  fat  has  proved  more  successful  than  was  antici- 
pated. Instead  of  determining  only  lauric  acid  and  possibly 
myristic  acid  from  the  insoluble  acids  as  originally  planned,  it 
has  been  found  possible  to  determine  caproic,  caprylic,  capric, 
lauric  and  myristic  acids  quantitatively  from  the  butter  fat. 
The  method  is  practicable  and  promises  material  assistance 
in  dairy  studies.  A  detailed  account  of  the  work  has  been 
accepted  for  publication  in  the  "Journal  of  Agricultural  Re- 
search." 

A  report  has  been  prepared  for  publication  in  the  same  jour- 
nal on  the  effect  of  air,  light  and  moisture,  singly  and  in  com- 


40  a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 

bination,  on  olive  oil.  The  investigation  covered  a  period  of 
six  years,  and  furnished  information  of  particular  scientific  in- 
terest and  of  practical  value. 

Co-operative  work  with  the  department  of  entomology  on 
the  problem  "why  insecticides  burn"  has  been  more  extensive 
than  usual,  including  complete  analyses  and  solubility  tests  of 
a  commercial  sample  of  dry  lead  arsenate,  lead  arsenate  paste 
and  Paris  green,  and  the  preparation  of  calcium  arsenate.  In 
addition,  dry  lime  sulfur,  Stunga  meal  for  earth  worms,  and 
the  preparation  of  a  new  spray  material  for  combating  the  red 
spider  have  received  considerable  attention. 

The  dehydrating  action  of  lime  sulfur  has  been  investigated 
for  Dr.  Stone,  formerly  of  the  botanical  department,  the  heat 
of  combustion  made  of  various  samples  for  the  microbiological 
department,  analysis  made  and  wax  content  determined  of  bee 
moth  excrement  for  the  entomological  department,  and  analy- 
sis made  of  apple  syrup  for  the  horticultural  department. 

Miscellaneous  work  on  arsenicals  and  the  determination  of 
invert  and  sucrose  sugars  in  different  varieties  of  strawberries 
have  consumed  considerable  time. 

(c)  Messrs.  Morse  and  Jones  state  that  the  relations  between 
lime  and  soil  acidity  have  been  investigated  on  the  soils  of  the 
fertilizer  plots.  The  capacity  of  these  soils  to  absorb  calcium 
from  different  compounds,  as  well  as  the  absorption  of  other 
similar  bases,  has  been  studied.  The  residual  carbonate  of  lime 
existing  in  the  soils,  which  at  one  time  or  another  have  been 
dressed  with  lime,  has  been  determined.  The  true  acidity  or 
hydrogen  ion  concentration  of  water  solution  from  the  soils  has 
been  determined.  The  specific  effects  of  different  fertilizers 
used  for  years  on  the  same  plots  have  been  compared  in  the 
foregoing  investigations.  A  mass  of  data  has  been  accumulated 
that  is  exceedingly  difficult  to  reduce  to  practical  applications. 

The  composition  of  the  cranberry  and  its  relations  to  storage 
and  decay  of  the  fruit  has  occupied  the  time  of  one  of  us  since 
the  cranberry  harvest  this  fall.  A  study  of  the  composition  of 
the  berries,  month  by  month,  as  they  have  been  received  from 
storage,  has  been  pursued.  The  variations  in  composition  pro- 
duced by  storage  at  different  temperatures,  by  asph;s-xiation  in 
close  packages  and  by  decay  have  been  compared.    The  rate  of 


191S.]  PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  41a 

respiration  or  exhalation  of  carbon  dioxide  has  been  measured  as 
a  guide  to  the  rate  of  chemical  change  taking  place  in  the  fruit 
after  being  picked. 

The  latter  group  of  problems  was  taken  up  at  the  request  of 
the  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry  of  the  United  States  Department 
of  Agriculture,  and  will  necessarily  extend  into  next  year. 

The  soil  problems  must  also  continue  in  order  to  follow  up 
promising  leads  arising  from  this  year's  work. 

2.    Fertilizer  Section. 
The  work  of  the  fertilizer  section,  in  charge  of  Mr.  Haskins, 
with  Messrs.  Walker,  Allen  and  Scull  as  assistants,  may  be 
summarized  as  follows :  — 

(a)     Fertilizers  registered. 
During  the  season  of  1917,  100  manufacturers,  importers  and 
dealers  have  secured  certificates  for  the  sale  of  512  brands  of 
fertilizer,  fertilizing  materials  and  agricultural  limes.    They  are 
classed  as  follows :  — 

Complete  fertilizers, 175 

Ammoniated  superphosphates, 182 

Ground  bone,  tankage  and  dry  ground  fish, 54 

Wood  ashes, 4 

Chemicals  and  organic  nitrogen  compounds, 65 

Agricultural  limes, 32 


512 

(6)  Fertilizers  collected  and  analyzed. 
During  the  year  5,452  tons  of  fertilizer  were  sampled,  ne- 
cessitating the  sampling  of  12,801  sacks.  One  hundred  and 
thirty-six  towns  were  visited;  1,047  samples,  representing  441 
distinct  brands,  were  drawn  from  stock  found  in  the  possession 
of  360  different  agents  or  owners,  and  626  distinct  analyses 
were  made.  In  addition,  numerous  samples  of  materials  both 
single  and  mixed  were  officially  collected  and  analyzed  for 
farmers,  so  that  the  total  number  officially  collected  and  ex- 
amined was  as  follows:  — 


42a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 

Complete  fertilizers, 140 

Ammoniated  superphosphates, 198 

Ground  bone,  tankage  and  dry  ground  fish, 72 

Nitrogen  compounds, 99 

Phosphoric  acid  compounds, 28 

Wood  ashes, 31 

Lime  compounds, 34 


602 


Full  details  regarding  the  fertilizer  inspection  work  will  be 
found  in  Bulletin  No.  8,  Control  Series,  published  in  December, 
1917. 

(c)  Other  Activities  of  the  Fertilizer  Section. 
After  the  completion  of  the  fertilizer  inspection  work  an  op- 
portunity was  found  for  the  analysis  of  a  great  variety  of  ferti- 
lizing by-products  which  had  been  sent  to  the  laboratory  by 
farmers  and  farmers'  organizations;  also,  during  November, 
December,  January,  February  and  March,  much  co-operative 
analytical  work  was  done  on  some  of  the  problems  of  the  Agri- 
cultural Department,  particularly  with  reference  to  the  analy- 
sis of  crops  grown  in  certain  experiments  both  in  the  field  and 
with  pots.    They  may  be  briefly  summarized  as  follows:  — 

Weights,  dry  matter  and  duplicate  phosphoric  acid  determinations  on 

157  samples  of  rape. 
Weights,  dry  matter  and  duplicate  phosphoric  acid  determinations  on  54 

samples  of  millet  seed  and  straw. 
Weights  and  dry  matter  determinations  on  392  samples  of  millet  seed 
and  392  samples  of  millet  straw;  also  140  potash,  128  nitrogen  and 
22  phosphoric  acid  determinations  were  made  on  this  series. 
Thirty  samples  of  soil  and  subsoil  collected  in  various  sections  of  the 
State  have  been  analyzed  for  their  content  of  acid  soluble  potash  as 
well  as  for  their  mechanical  analyses. 
Five  hundred  and  sixteen  different  substances  have  been  received  and 
analyzed  for  farmers  and  the  various  departments  of  the  experiment 
station,  and  may  be  grouped  as  follows :  — 

Fertilizers  and  fertilizer  by-products, 198 

Lime  products, 22 

Soils  for  lime  requirements  and  organic  matter  tests,   .       .        .     289 
Soils  for  partial  analysis,  water  soluble  constituents,    ...         5 

516 


1918.]  PUBLIC  DOCmiENT  — No.  31.  43  a 

Time  has  been  found  for  co-operative  work  with  the  Associa- 
tion of  Official  Agricultural  Chemists,  Mr.  Haskins  serving  as 
referee  on  nitrogen  for  the  year. 

(d)     Vegetation  Tests. 

In  this  division  work  has  been  continued,  in  co-operation  with 
the  basic  slag  committee  of  the  Association  of  Official  Agri- 
cultural Chemists,  in  the  study  of  the  availability  of  phosphoric 
acid  in  basic  slag  phosphate.  The  work  this  season  was  for  the 
purpose  of  noting  the  residual  effect  of  the  different  phosphates 
used  during  the  preceding  year. 

One  series  of  pot  experiments  with  rape,  comprising  18  pots, 
has  been  completed  to  study  the  availability  of  phosphoric 
acid  in  apatite  and  barium  sulfide  (Barium-Phosphate). 

Another  series  with  millet,  comprising  10  pots,  has  been 
completed  to  study  the  crop-producing  power  of  Nature's 
Wonder  Mineral  Plant  Food,  a  ground  metamorphic  rock  which 
has  been  advertised  and  sold  under  different  names  to  a  greater 
or  less  extent  in  Massachusetts  for  several  years.  The  results 
have  not  been  published,  but  fully  substantiate  previous  ex- 
periments with  the  material  which  show  that  it  possesses  but 
little  value  as  a  source  of  plant  food. 

3.    Feed  and  Dairy  Section. 
A  summary  of  the  work  of  the  feed  and  dairy  section,  in 
charge  of  Mr.  Smith,  assisted  by  Messrs.  Beals,  Peables,  J.  B. 
Smith  and  J.  T.  Howard,  follows:  — 

(a)     The    Feeding    Stuffs    Law    (Acts    and    Resolves  for    1912, 

Chapter  527). 
During  the  past  year  1,082  samples  of  feeding  stuffs  were 
collected  at  140  places  of  business.  About  1,400  brands  have 
be^n  registered  and  permits  for  sale  issued.  Four  cases  have 
been  prosecuted  where  goods  ran  substantially  below  guarantee, 
and  one  case  for  failure  to  attach  guarantee  tags  as  required  by 
statute.  In  addition,  a  number  of  samples  have  been  drawn  for 
the  Federal  government,  and  action  is  still  pending.    Although 


44  a 


EXPERIMENT  STATION. 


[Jan. 


prices  have  ruled  high  and  actual  shortage  has  at  times  existed, 
goods  offered  have,  with  few  exceptions,  been  as  represented. 

For  the  purpose  of  uniformity  with  other  States  requiring 
registration  of  feeding  stuffs,  the  act  has  been  amended  so  as  to 
allow  registrations  to  run  with  the  calendar  year  instead  of  from 
September  1  to  September  1. 

The  results  of  the  year's  work  in  detail  can  be  found  in 
Bulletin  No.  7,  Control  Series. 

(6)     The  Dairy  Law  {Ads  and  Resolves  for  1912,  Chapter  218). 

(1)  Examination  for  Certificates.  —  Forty-seven  applicants 
have  been  examined  and  found  proficient. 

(2)  Inspection  of  Glassware.  —  Seven  thousand  five  hundred 
and  twenty-two  pieces  of  Babcock  glassware  have  been  tested 
for  accuracy,  of  which  8  were  condemned. 

Following  is  a  summary  of  the  last  seventeen  years:  — 


Year. 


Number  of 
Pieces  tested. 


Number  of 

Pieces 
condemned. 


Percentage 
condemned. 


1901, 
1902, 
1903, 
1904, 
1905, 
1906, 
1907, 
1908, 
1909, 
1910, 
1911, 
1912, 
1913, 
1914, 
1915, 
1916, 
1917, 

Totals, 


5,041 
2,344 
2,240 
2,026 
1,665 
2,457 
3,082 
2,713 
4,071 
4,047 
4,466 
6,056 
6,394 
6,336 
4,956 
5,184 
7,522 
70,600 


291 

56 

57 

200 

197 

763 

204 

33 

43 

41 

12 

27 

34 

18 

4 

5 

8 

1,993 


5.77 

2.40 

2.54 

9.87 

11.83 

31.05 

6.62 

1.22 

1.06 

1.01 

.27 

.45 

.53 

.28 

.08 

.10 

.11 

2.82' 


'  Average. 


1918.1 


PUBLIC  DOCmiENT  — No.  31. 


45  a 


(3)  Inspection  of  Machines  and  Apparatus.  —  During  the 
months  of  November  and  December,  Mr.  J.  T.  Howard,  the 
authorized  deputy,  inspected  the  machines  and  apparatus  in 
SS  milk  depots,  creameries  and  milk  inspection  laboratories. 
Three  machines  were  condemned  as  unfit  for  use,  and  minor 
repairs  ordered  in  several  others. 

Following  is  a  list  of  creameries,  milk  depots  and  milk  in- 
spectors' laboratories  visited  in  1917:  — 

1 .     Creameries. 


Location. 

Name. 

Manager  or  Proprietor. 

1.  Amherst, 

2.  Ashfield, 

3.  Belchertown, 

4.  Cummington, 

5.  Easthampton, 

6.  Monterey, 

7.  Northfield,     . 

8.  Shelburne,     . 

Amherst 

Ashfield  Co-operative, 
Belchertown  Co-operative, 
Cummington  Co-operative, 
Hampton  Co-operative,   . 
Berkshire  Hills  Co-operative,  . 
Northfield  Co-operative, 
Shelburne  Co-operative,  . 

R.  W.  Pease,  proprietor. 
Wm.  Hunter,  manager. 
M.  G.  Ward,  manager. 
D.  C.  Morey,  manager. 
W.  S.  Wilcox,  manager. 
F.  A.  Campbell,  manager. 
C.  C.  Stearns,  manager. 
W.  C.  Webber,  manager. 

2.     Milk  Depots. 


Location. 

Name. 

Manager. 

1.  Boston, 

2.  Boston, 

3.  Boston  (Dorchester), 

4.  Boston  (Charlestown), 

5.  Boston  (Charlestown), 

6.  Boston  (Forest  Hills), 

7.  Boston  (Dorchester), 

8.  Boston,      . 

9.  Boston,      . 

10.  Boston  (Charlestown), 

11.  Boston, 

12.  Boston  (Charlestown), 

13.  Boston  (Jamaica  Plain), 

14.  Cambridge, 

15.  Conway,    . 

Alden  Brothers  Branch, 

Boston  Jersey  Creamery,    . 

Elm  Farm  Milk  Company, 

H.  P.  Hood  &  Sons,    .... 

H.  P.  Hood  &  Sons,  No.  2, 

H.  P.  Hood  &  Sons,    .... 

Morgan  Brothers,         .... 

Oak  Grove  Farm 

Plymouth  Creamery  Company, 
Rockingham  Milk  Company, 
Turner  Centre  Dairying  Association, 
D.  Whiting  &  Sons,     .... 
Westwood  Farm  Milk  Company, 
C.  Brigham  &  Son,      .... 
H.  P.  Hood  &  Sons 

Wm.  Johnson. 
T.  P.  Grant. 
J.  K.  Knapp. 
N.  C.  Davis. 
N.  C.  Davis. 
N.  C.  Davis. 
A.  G.  Johnson. 
J.  Alden. 
W.  J.  Gardner. 
C.  A.  Bray. 
I.  L.  Smith. 
J.  K.  Whiting. 
V.  E.  Clem. 
J.  K.  Whiting. 
F.  E.  Burnett. 

46  a 


EXPERIMENT  STATION. 


[Jan. 


2.    Milk  De-pots  —  Concluded. 


Location. 

Name. 

Manager. 

16.  East  Watertown, 

Lyndonville  Creamery  Association,    . 

H.  A.  Smith. 

17.  Everett,    . 

Frank  E.  Boyd, 

F.  E.  Boyd. 

18.  Everett,    . 

Hampden  Creamery  Company, 

R.  T.  Mooney. 

19.  Lawrence, 

Jersey  Ice  Cream  Company, 

J.  N.  Gurdy. 

20.  Lawrence, 

Turner  Centre  Dairying  Association, 

F.  M.  Barr. 

21.  Lawrence, 

Willardale  Creamery,  .... 

F.  H.  Willard. 

22.  North  Adams, 

Ormsby  Farms, 

W.  E.  Penniman. 

23.  North  Egremont, 

Willowbrook  Dairy,     .... 

D.  Nanninga. 

24.  Sheffield,  , 

Willowbrook  Dairy,     .... 

F.  B.  Percy. 

25.  Shelburne  Falls, 

H.  P.  Hood  &  Sons 

R.  E.  Wetherbee. 

26.  Southborough, 

Deerfoot  Farms,           .... 

S.  H.  Howes. 

27.  Somerville, 

Seven  Oaks  Dairy  Company, 

A.  B.  Parker. 

28.  Somerville, 

Acton  Farms  Milk  Company,     . 

J.  Colgan. 

29.  Springfield, 

Tait  Brothers, 

H.  Tait. 

30.  Waltham, 

Manhattan  Creamery, 

A.  W.  Jenkins. 

31.  West  Lynn, 

H.  P.  Hood  &  Sons,    .... 

N.  C.  Davis. 

3.    Milk 

Inspectors. 

Location. 

Inspector. 

Location. 

Inspector. 

1.  Amesbury, 

J.  L.  Stewart. 

16.  Gardner,     . 

H.  0.  Knight. 

2.  Amherst,     . 

P.  H.  Smith. 

17.  Greenfield, 

G.  P.  Moore. 

3.  Attleboro,  . 

S.  Leiboff. 

18.  Haverhill,  . 

J.  A.  Ruel. 

4.  Barnstable, 

G.  T.  Mecarta. 

19.  Holyoke,     . 

D.  Hartnett. 

5.  Boston, 

J.  0.  Jordan. 

20.  Lawrence,  . 

J.  H.  Tobin. 

6.  Brockton,  . 

G.  E.  Boiling. 

21.  Lowell, 

M.  Marster. 

7.  Cambridge, 

W.  A.  Noonan. 

22.  Lynn, 

H.  P.  Bennett. 

8.  Chelsea,      . 

W.  S.  Walkley. 

23.  Maiden,       . 

J.  A.  Sanford. 

9.  Chicopee,    . 

C.  J.  O'Brien. 

24.  Millbury,     . 

F.  A.  Watkins. 

10.  CUnton,      . 

G.  L.  Chase. 

25.  New  Bedford, 

H.  B.  Hamilton. 

11.  Dedham,    . 

E.  Knobel. 

26.  Newton, 

A.  C.  Hudson. 

12.  Everett,      . 

E.  C.  Colby. 

27.  North  Adams, 

C.T.Quackenbush. 

13.  Fall  River. 

H.  Boisseau. 

28.  Northampton, 

G.  R.  Turner. 

14.  Fitchburg, 

J.  F.  Bresnahan. 

29.  Pittsfield,    . 

B.  M.  Collins. 

15.  Framingham, 

F.  S.  Dodson. 

30.  Plainville,   . 

J.  J.  Eiden. 

1918. 


PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31. 


47  a 


3.     Milk  Inspectors  —  Concluded. 


Location. 

Inspector. 

LoC.IlTION. 

Inspector. 

31.  Plymouth,  . 

W.  E.  Briggs. 

39.  Ware,  .... 

F.  E.  Marsh. 

32.  Revere, 

J.  E.  Lamb. 

40.  Watertown, 

L.  Simonds. 

33.  Salem, 

J.  J.  McGrath. 

4L  Wellesley,    . 

W.  A.  Berger. 

34.  Somerville, 

H.  E.  Bowman. 

42.  Westfield,     . 

W.  H.  Junkins. 

35.  South  Hadley,    . 

G.  F.  Beaudreau. 

43.  Winchendon, 

G.  W.  Stanbridge. 

36.  Springfield, 

S.  C.  Downs. 

44.  Woburn, 

D.  F.  Callahan. 

37.  Taunton,     . 

L.  C.  Tucker. 

45.  Worcester,    . 

G.  L.  Berg. 

38.  Waltham,    . 

G.  D.  Affleck. 

4.     Miscellaneous. 


Location. 

Name. 

Manager. 

1.  Boston, 

2.  Boston, 

3.  Greenfield 

4.  Springfield,          .... 

Walker-Gordon  Laboratory, 
Boston  Laboratories,  Inc.,  . 
Franklin  County  Farm  Bureau, 
Emerson  Laboratory, 

B.  W.  Nichols. 
L.  W.  Lee. 
Miss  M.  Howard. 
H.  C.  Emerson. 

(c)  Milk,  Cream  and  Feeds  for  Free  Examination. 
As  in  the  past  this  department  has  continued  to  analyze 
samples  of  milk,  cream  and  feeds  sent  by  residents  of  the  State 
where  circumstances  would  appear  to  warrant  this  procedure. 
Work  will  not  be  done,  however,  which  belongs  more  properly 
to  a  commercial  chemist.  During  the  year  202  samples  of 
feeding  stuffs,  744  samples  of  milk,  631  samples  of  cream,  3 
samples  of  ice  cream,  1  sample  of  condensed  milk,  and  2 
samples  of  vinegar  were  analyzed. 


(d)     Water. 

Sixty-six  samples  of  water  received  in  containers  furnished  by 

the  experiment  station  were  analyzed.     A  fee  of  $3  is  charged 

for  this  service,  and  application  for  the  analysis  must  be  made 

in  advance.     Of  the  samples  analyzed,  50  were  from  wells,  11 


48  a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 

from  springs,  4  from  ponds  or  brooks,  and  1  from  pond  ice. 
Water  from  public  supplies  is  not  analyzed,  they  being  under 
the  jurisdiction  of  the  State  Department  of  Health. 

(e)  Testing  of  Pure-bred  Cows  for  Advanced  Registry. 
Four  men  have  been  given  regular  employment  in  conducting 
yearly  tests  of  Jersey,  Guernsey,  Ayrshire,  Shorthorn  and 
Brown  Swiss  cows,  and  in  addition  extra  men  are  employed  as 
occasion  demands.  This  work  requires  the  presence  of  a  super- 
visor at  a  farm  for  at  least  two  days  each  month.  The  two-day 
test  period  forms  a  basis  for  computing  the  monthly  milk  and 
fat  yield  reported  by  the  breeders  direct  to  their  respective 
cattle  clubs.  Following  is  a  monthly  summary  of  the  work  for 
the  two-day  yearly  tests :  — 


1918. 


PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31. 


49  a 


-:3 

■^ 

to 

■* 

■* 

00 

00 

OS 

r* 

rf 

^ 

^ 

■.*< 

*.** 

■.J* 

■.»< 

-.?< 

s 

■.f* 

>o 

o 

c-i 

"£  c 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

„ 

rt 

^ 

^ 

_, 

„ 

rt 

1 

0  '- 

^  9 

!/}■*- 

a 

a 

£ 

=   » 

1 

> 

^   1 

to 

£■& 

Q 
K 

H« 

V 

X 

0 

to 

o 

» 

o 

to 

to 

to 

t^ 

•^ 

t- 

00 

t~ 

1 

« 

t-< 

a 

>. 

P3 

< 

S 

>, 

oo 

05 

05 

c» 

OS 

o 

o 

o 

o 

_ 

o 

en 

1 

» 

^—1 

£ 

a) 

1-5 

>. 

o 

m 

o 

o 

00 

I^ 

r^ 

t^ 

o 

C5 

a. 

C5 

1 

a 

C<5 

CO 

CO 

M 

M 

IM 

M 

C<1 

CO 

e<i 

% 

O 

~" 

?J 

in 

N 

«5 

o 

lO 

o 

CO 

■^ 

ci 

■^ 

to 

-.*< 

1^ 

UO 

CO 

0 

M 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

H 

•* 

_^ 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

-* 

tn 

I^ 

W5 

0  t 

^  o 

M  — 

H 

» 

K 

S  M 

1 

1 

1 

■* 

lO 

to 

t^ 

00 

CO 

M 

lO 

H 

l^ 

0? 

£■? 

S; 

pqcK 

0 

O 

b 

o 

c 

■JS 

o 

lO 

CO 

CI 

•^ 

CS 

o 

lO 

Ci 

o 

CO 

•* 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

•* 

>rt 

TJ< 

■o 

>c 

« 

o 

H 

Ul 

n 

>> 

s 

-J5 

D 

Z 

>. 

o 

p 

*H 

■o 

CO 

00 

o 

r^ 

00 

_■ 

■^ 

fs. 

o 

o 

M 

o 

m 

00 

r^ 

!>. 

•o 

30 

o 

►-5 

>, 

M 

o 

lO 

:o 

o 

Ci 

00 

o 

o 

cs 

-^1 

r^ 

r^ 

00 

2 

CO 

00 

o 

o 

C5 

o 

o 

t^ 

C<l 

M 

M 

«-) 

3 

m" 

O 

u 

L      t- 

ffi 

S  «"  °  ^  o 

00 

t^ 

o 

o 

CO 

- 

00 

t^ 

o 

t^ 

TO 

00 

1 

c 

ir0 

0       > 

3 

Z 

a 

H 

Z 

o 

tT 

u, 

* 

O 

c3 

^^ 

^ 

S 

B 

"5 
o 

i 

p 

4 

3 

C3 

< 

^ 

s 

c 

3 
•-5 

■-5 

3 

3 
< 

1 

o 

> 

o 

H 

50  a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 

The  Holstein  tests,  usually  based  on  a  seven  or  thirty  day 
period,  require  the  presence  of  a  supervisor  during  the  entire 
test.  It  is  becoming  increasingly  difficult  to  secure  men  for  this 
work,  as  it  does  not  warrant  continuous  employment.  During 
the  year  23  different  men  have  been  employed  in  these  shorter 
tests,  and  158  seven-day,  31  fourteen-day,  38  thirty-day,  and 
1  sixty-day  tests,  making  a  total  of  228,  have  been  completed. 
This  work  was  conducted  at  29  different  farms. 

4.  Numerical  Summary  of  Laboratory  Work,  December, 
1916,  TO  December,  1917. 

There  have  been  received  and  tested  66  samples  of  water, 
744  of  milk,  631  of  cream,  3  of  ice  cream,  1  of  oleomargarine, 
1  of  condensed  milk,  202  of  feedstuffs,  198  of  fertilizers  and 
fertilizer  by-products,  22  of  lime  products,  289  of  soils  for  lime 
requirements,  5  of  soils  for  water  soluble  matter,  2  tests  for 
arsenical  poisoning,  1  of  slum  gum,  2  of  vinegar,  1  of  coal,  8  of 
lime-sulfur,  2  of  arsenate  of  lead,  1  of  Paris  green,  2  of  fruit 
preserves,  14  of  strawberries  and  10  miscellaneous. 

The  fertilizers  officially  collected  numbered  1,047,  and  the 
cattle  feeds,  1,082.  There  have  also  been  tested,  in  connection 
with  experiments  in  progress  in  the  several  departments  of  the 
station,  266  samples  of  milk,  152  of  cattle  feeds,  50  of  faeces, 
8  of  urine,  157  of  rape,  838  of  millet  seed  or  straw,  and  30  of 
soils.  The  above  totals  5,835  samples,  and  does  not  include 
the  work  of  the  research  section  nor  that  required  by  the  dairy 
law. 


1918.1  PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  51a 


DEPARTMENT  OF  ENTOMOLOGY. 


A.  I.  BOURNE. 


The  u'ork  of  the  entomology  department  has  followed  in  gen- 
eral lines  similar  to  former  years. 

The  correspondence  has  called  for  a  much  larger  amount  of 
time  and  effort  than  usual.  Inquiries  relative  to  over  250  differ- 
ent insects,  as  well  as  many  questions  on  the  proper  use  of 
various  insecticides,  and  on  pests  other  than  insects,  were  re- 
ceived and  answered.  This  increase  was  to  be  expected,  in 
view  of  the  fact  that  an  unusually  large  number  of  persons 
throughout  the  State  were  taking  up  the  cultivation  of  small 
gardens,  many  for  the  first  time,  in  response  to  the  National 
Campaign  for  Food  Production.  As  a  consequence,  many  com- 
plaints were  received  and  information  requested  for  the  control 
of  the  most  common  of  our  insect  pests,  with  which  most  of  the 
experienced  growers  were  already  familiar,  and  concerning 
which  in  former  years  we  received  few,  if  any,  complaints.  It 
is  safe  to  state  that  during  the  months  of  June,  July  and  August 
the  bulk  of  the  daily  correspondence  was  doubled,  with  a  large 
increase  during  the  rest  of  the  season  over  former  years. 

Aside  from  the  more  common  insects  there  were  unusually 
severe  outbreaks  of  several  species  which  normally  are  of  little 
or  no  economic  importance. 

The  rose  chafer,  which  usually  causes  more  or  less  injury  to 
grapes  and  ornamental  stock,  such  as  roses,  etc.,  was  this  last 
season  present  in  very  large  numbers,  and  proved  a  serious  pest 
to  almost  all  garden  crops  as  well  as  to  young  fruit  trees. 

The  chrysanthemum  gall  midge,  a  pest  to  be  dreaded  by 
growers  of  greenhouse  chrysanthemums,  owing  to  the  enormous 
expense  necessary  to  eradicate  it  once  it  has  become  firmly 
established,  was  reported  from  several  points  in  the  State,  and 
caused  much  uneasiness  on  the  part  of  florists. 


52  a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 

The  potato  plant  louse,  normally  present  but  in  such  small 
numbers  that  it  can  be  entirely  ignored,  u'as  this  year  so  abun- 
dant and  caused  such  rapid  destruction  in  badly  infested  fields 
that  especial  attention  on  the  part  of  the  department  was  called 
for,  and  a  bulletin  delineating  its  habits  and  methods  for  its 
control  was  prepared  and  published. 

During  the  early  part  of  August  the  department  received 
numerous  reports  of  "greenish  caterpillars"  defoliating  forest 
and  shade  trees,  notably  maples  and  beeches,  from  towns  in 
Berkshire,  Franklin  and  Hampshire  counties.  Upon  a  careful 
survey  of  the  infested  region  the  injury  was  found  to  be  due 
principally  to  two  species,  —  larvse  of  the  two-lined  prominent 
moth  and  the  green-striped  maple  worm.  An  indication  of  the 
nature  and  extent  of  this  injury  may  be  gathered  from  the 
following  report:  "Individual  trees  were  often  completely 
stripped  of  foliage,  and,  in  some  localities,  the  woods  were  so 
denuded  that  it  appeared  like  late  fall,  when  half  to  two-thirds 
of  the  foliage  is  gone." 

Mention  may  here  be  made  of  several  species  of  somewhat 
less  importance,  from  an  economic  standpoint,  but  of  interest 
from  the  fact  that  they  had  not  been  reported  to  this  office  be- 
fore, or,  at  least,  not  as  occurring  in  numbers  enough  to  be  a 
source  of  danger.  In  this  class  belong  the  grape-vine  tomato 
gall  midge,  asparagus  miner,  parsnip  web-worm  and  celery  and 
parsnip  plant  louse.  These,  while  not  occurring  in  large  num- 
bers in  any  particular  region,  were  quite  generally  present 
throughout  the  State. 

Of  the  common  pests,  plant  lice  of  all  kinds,  the  squash-vine 
borer,  flea  beetles,  cabbage  worms  of  several  kinds  and  the 
potato  stalk  borer  were  present  in  large  numbers,  and  caused 
a  corresponding  amount  of  damage  to  crops. 

As  in  former  years,  numerous  species  brought  to  this  country 
from  abroad  on  imported  nursery  stock  were  sent  to  this  office 
by  the  inspectors  for  identification.  This  work,  while  calling 
for  considerable  expenditure  of  time,  is,  nevertheless,  of  value 
in  order  to  keep  the  department  in  touch  with  insects  which 
might,  if  they  once  became  established,  develop  into  serious 
pests.  An  instance  of  this  is  the  so-called  orange-tail  moth,  a 
European  species  closely  related  to  the  brown-tail  moth,  which 


1918.]  PUBLIC   DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  53a 

was  collected  by  the  inspectors  during  this  past  year  on  stock 
from  two  different  points  abroad. 

A  new  pest,  the  European  corn  borer,  which  from  present 
knowledge  is  capable  of  causing  severe  injury  to  the  corn  crop, 
was  this  season  found  to  be  firmly  established  in  the  district 
immediately  around  Boston.  Taking  into  consideration  the 
damage  to  corn  in  the  more  or  less  restricted  area  infested  dur- 
ing the  past  season,  we  can  readily  foresee  the  terrible  losses  it 
would  cause  should  it  ever  be  able  to  spread  to  the  large  corn 
fields  of  the  West.  A  study  of  the  nature  of  its  attack  and  life 
history,  together  with  a  survey  of  the  infested  region,  was 
undertaken,  and  a  preliminary  paper  giving  information  thus 
far  obtained  has  been  published.  More  extensive  work  is 
planned  for  the  coming  season. 

The  other  field  work  of  the  department  has  progressed  satis- 
factorily. A  bulletin  on  the  "Control  of  the  Red  Spider  in 
Greenhouses"  is  now  ready  for  publication.  Further  work  along 
the  line  of  cultural  methods  of  control  is  planned. 

The  experiments  on  the  study  of  the  causes  of  foliage  injury 
from  spraying  with  pure  insecticides  have  been  completed,  and 
have  progressed  well  with  the  use  of  the  commercial  materials. 

The  work  on  the  control  of  the  onion  fly  was  checked  some- 
what during  the  past  season  because  of  an  absence  of  the  insects 
in  the  experimental  plots  and  the  immediate  neighborhood. 

Nearly  all  of  the  other  lines  of  work  are  well  along  toward 
completion. 


54a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 


DEPARTMENT   OF   HORTICULTURE. 


FR.\XK  A.  WAUGH. 


During  the  year  two  new  projects  have  been  added  to  our  re- 
search program.  These  are  (a)  studies  in  peach  breeding  and 
(b)  critical  studies  of  tree  and  leaf  characters  in  varieties  of 
fruits,  especially  apples  and  peaches. 

"Work  has  been  practically  concluded  in  the  plant-breeding 
experiments  with  beans  and  peas,  and  an  early  publication  of 
results  is  contemplated.  Important  practical  results  have  been 
secured  in  the  orchard  management  experiments,  and  material 
is  being  prepared  for  publication  dealing  with  (a)  orchard  ren- 
ovation, (6)  soil  management  in  the  orchard  and  (c)  varieties 
of  fruits,  especially  apples. 

A  new  experimental  orchard  of  275  trees  has  been  planted  in 
the  town  of  Buckland  as  a  part  of  the  more  extended  research 
work  on  problems  of  reciprocal  influences  between  stock  and 
cion  in  graftage. 

Experimental  work  with  market-garden  crops  is  getting  under 
way  at  the  market-garden  field  station  in  North  Lexington,  and 
we  hope  that  this  line  of  work  will  soon  come  to  have  consider- 
able value  to  the  State.  Further  experimental  work  is  much 
needed  with  florists'  crops  and  with  small  fruits,  especially 
strawberries. 


1918.1  PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  55  a 


DEPARTMENT   OF   MICROBIOLOGY. 


CHARLES   E.  MARSHALL. 


The  regular  work  of  the  microbiology  department  of  the  ex- 
periment station  has  been  a  study  of  soil  fertility  under  the 
Adams  fund.  In  addition  to  this  there  has  been  a  limited  allow- 
ance for  milk  investigations.  The  department  has  also  received 
support  under  the  De  Laval  fund,  which  has  provided  resources 
for  the  study  of  milk  clarification. 

The  soil  studies  were  diligently  pursued  throughout  the  3'ear 
by  Dr.  F.  H.  H.  van  Suchtelen,  who  severed  his  connection 
with  this  institution  Sept.  1,  1917.  Dr.  van  Suchtelen,  how- 
ever, had  reached  the  point  where  he  had  formulated  certain 
directive  principles  which  will  be  a  great  aid  to  the  develop- 
ment and  continuance  of  the  problems  involved.  Dr.  A.  Itano 
was  appointed  to  take  up  the  work  where  Dr.  van  Suchtelen 
had  dropped  it,  and  has  been  pursuing  it  further  and  endeavor- 
ing to  carry  it  through  to  its  concrete  application.  In  this  work 
he  has  been  assisted  by  Mr.  George  B.  Ray, 

Before  Dr.  Itano  was  appointed  to  take  up  the  study  in  soil 
fertility  from  the  microbiological  standpoint  he  had  been  giving 
considerable  time  to  the  study  of  soy  bean  preparations  for 
human  food.  In  the  carrying  out  of  this  work  he  not  only- 
tested  out  the  work  that  had  been  done  prior  to  his  study,  but 
he  devised  several  new  formulae  which  possess  much  merit. 
The  result  of  his  efforts,  which  continued  over  about  four 
months,  has  been  published. 

Dr.  Itano,  with  the  assistance  of  Mr.  G.  B.  Ray  and  Mr. 
James  Neill,  has  prepared  cultures  of  nitrogen-gathering  bac- 
teria for  legumes,  and  Miss  Dondale  has  distributed  these  where 
requested.    The  number  ordered  may  be  of  interest:  — 


56  a 


EXPERIMENT  STATION, 


[Jan. 


For  alfalfa, 
For  red  clover,  . 
For  alsike  clover, 
For  sweet  clover, 
For  crimson  clover, 
For  field  beans, 
For  soy  beans,   . 
For  peas,     . 
For  cow  peas,    . 
For  vetch,  . 

Total,  . 


202 
17 

4 

13 

14 

366 

441 

80 

7 

28 


1,172 


The  laboratory  has  made  itself  useful  to  the  health  of  the 
community  through  many  tests  made  for  physicians  by  Dr. 
Itano. 

The  past  year  milk  studies  outside  of  milk  clarification  were 
suspended  for  emergency  food  investigations.  In  the  latter 
studies  it  has  been  aimed  principally  to  survey  the  situation  and 
gather  material  to  outline  the  plan  of  study  for  curtailing  loss 
in  the  canning  of  food.  In  this  undertaking  Mr.  E.  G.  Hood 
and  Mr.  G.  B.  Ray  have  given  most  generously  of  their  time, 
and  have  furnished  valuable  assistance.  At  the  time  of  writing 
this  report  we  are  planning  to  make  an  intensive  attack  upon 
the  problems  of  canning.  The  results  accumulated  thus  far  will 
simply  be  brought  together  in  connection  \\'ith  the  results  we 
hope  to  secure  in  the  future  work. 

Mr.  E.  G.  Hood  has  also  conducted  many  milk  determina- 
tions for  the  town  of  Amherst,  for  individuals  sending  in 
samples  and  for  dairy  exhibits.  He  has  tested  for  the  town  of 
Amherst  118  samples,  outside  material  sent  in,  32  samples,  milk 
in  dairy  exhibits,  .369  samples. 

The  De  Laval  studies  have  been  pursued  throughout  the  past 
year  by  these  graduate  assistants:  Mr.  E.  G.  Hood,  Mr.  R.  C. 
Avery  and  Mr.  S.  G.  INIutkekar.  Miss  Louise  Hompe,  Mr. 
H.  A.  Cheplin  and  Mr.  J.  E.  Martin  began  work  in  September. 
Of  these  men,  Mr.  Avery  enlisted  for  war  service  in  July,  INIr. 
Cheplin  in  November  and  Mr.  Martin  in  December.  Consider- 
ing the  difficulties  under  which  we  have  been  working,  decided 
progress  may  be  reported. 


191S.1  PUBLIC   DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  57a 


DEPARTMENT  OF  POULTRY  HUSBANDRY. 


H.  D.  GOODALE. 


Egg  Production. 

This  year's  flock  is  superior  to  last  year's  in  that  a  larger  pro- 
portion matured  earher,  with  a  corresponding  increase  in  flock 
production  early  in  the  season.  Thus  the  mean  October  pro- 
duction of  pullets  hatched  March  18  to  April  1  was  nearly  12 
eggs,  as  compared  with  -1  eggs  for  the  flock  of  corresponding 
age  a  year  ago  after  families  of  known  poor  producers  were 
excluded  from  the  latter. 

Although  production  in  the  high  strains  is  very  satisfactory, 
there  is  room  for  further  improvement,  especially  in  regard  to 
rate  of  production.  Now  that  a  satisfactory  degree  of  maturity 
has  been  reached  much  more  attention  will  be  paid  to  rate,  but 
slower  progress  may  be  expected  because  the  demand  for  space 
made  in  the  development  of  the  non-broody  strain  forces  us  to 
reduce  the  flock  of  high  winter  layers  to  one-third  its  present 
size. 

An  intensive  study  of  our  data  u'ith  relation  to  the  winter 
cycle  of  egg  production  was  made  during  the  year.  A  paper  em- 
bodying this  work  has  been  published.  It  was  concluded,  first, 
a  winter  cycle  is  a  definite  biological  entity,  best  recognized  in 
the  individual  by  a  pause  (usually  exceeding  ten  days  in  length, 
and  beginning  in  December,  January  or,  rarely,  February) 
following  an  egg-production  period  of  considerable  length; 
second,  monthly  rate  of  production  is  not  a  good  index  of  the 
winter  cycle;  third,  many  individuals  lack  the  winter  cycle  and 
lay  continuously  throughout  the  winter;  fourth,  this  cycle  is 
perhaps  a  recessive  Mendelian  character. 

Trap-nest  work  was  begun  last  fall  (1916)  on  Brown  Leghorns 
in  connection  with  the  work  on  broodiness.     Curiously  enough, 


58a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 

a  type  of  winter  egg  record  was  secured  from  many  individuals 
that  has  been  practically  absent  from  the  Rhode  Island  Reds, 
and  which  we  believe  corresponds  to  the  class  designated  as 
mediocre  producers  by  Pearl.  They  should  furnish  important 
corroborative  evidence  regarding  the  inheritance  of  fecundity. 

The  trap-nested  pullets  were  transferred  again  this  year  to 
roosting  sheds,  this  time  in  July.  We  find  this  method  a  satis- 
factory solution  for  the  problem  of  carrying  the  birds  through 
the  year  and  still  having  the  houses  ready  for  the  pullets  in 
September.  We  shall,  however,  make  the  transfer  in  June  the 
coming  season. 

The  flock  of  pullets  bred  for  absence  of  broodiness  numbers 
this  year  about  125  individuals.  In  addition,  we  have  retained 
40  non-broody  hens  for  breeding  purposes,  besides  a  number  of 
males  from  families  of  similar  breeding.  Among  the  families 
tested  last  season  was  one  in  which  the  ratio  of  broody  to  non- 
broody  individuals  was  1 :  3,  while  several  others  had  a  ratio 
of  1:1.  The  normal  ratio  for  our  flocks  is  19:1.  Unfortu- 
nately, the  exigencies  of  the  situation  have  resulted  in  reduced 
winter  egg  production.  However,  no  difficulties  are  anticipated 
in  eventually  bringing  this  strain  to  a  plane  equally  high  with 
that  secured  when  birds  are  bred  primarily  for  winter  produc- 
tion. 

As  a  part  of  the  work  on  broodiness  an  endeavor  is  being 
made  to  produce  a  strain  in  which  broodiness  shall  be  as  in- 
tensively developed  as  possible. 

Up  to  the  present  the  facilities  afforded  by  the  present  plant 
have  been  fairly  adequate  for  the  work  in  breeding  for  increased 
egg  production,  since  this  period  has  been  devoted  primarily  to 
a  study  of  the  problem  rather  than  to  an  attempt  to  breed  for 
increased  egg  production.  The  steps  that  must  be  taken  to 
secure  high  annual  production  are  perfectly  well  defined.  Briefly, 
they  involve  the  permanent  combination  in  one  strain  of  all 
those  factors,  e.g.,  non-broodiness,  high  rate,  etc.,  that  make  for 
high  production.  The  chance  of  securing  the  proper  combina- 
tion in  one  individual  is  directly  proportional  to  the  number  of 
individuals  studied.  It  is  probably  not  greater  than  1  in  5,000. 
But  since  the  genetic  composition  of  the  male  cannot  be  directly 
observed,  but  must  be  inferred  from  a  study  of  his  female  rela- 


191S.]  PUBLIC   DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  59a 

tives,  and  since  his  sisters  almost  always  differ  from  each  other 
in  several  points,  one  is  as  likely  as  not  to  select  a  male  cor- 
responding to  his  poorest  sister  as  to  his  best  one.  If,  however, 
numerous  matings  are  made  and  tested,  the  chances  of  mating 
good  males  to  good  females  is  increased  in  proportion  to  the 
number  of  matings  made.  Thus  the  length  of  the  job  of  pro- 
ducing a  strain  averaging  250  eggs  annually  depends  upon  the 
scale  on  which  operations  are  conducted. 

We  are  sometimes  asked  why  we  do  not  keep  our  layers  for 
more  than  one  year.  The  answer  is  that  the  pullets  require  all 
the  available  space.  Xow  the  annual  renewal  of  the  laying 
flock  is  a  large  item  on  a  commercial  plant,  and  absolutely 
necessary  with  available  strains  of  American  breeds.  However, 
there  seems  to  be  no  biological  barrier  in  the  way  of  securing  a 
strain  that  will  lay  heavily  year  after  year. 

The  accumulation  of  data  on  hatching  quality  of  eggs  is  being 
continued  as  a  part  of  routine  procedure,  but  it  has  been 
necessary  to  drop  the  attempt  —  as  a  separate  piece  of  work  — 
to  produce  a  strain  whose  eggs  all  hatch. 

The  policy  of  rearing  the  chicks  on  clean  ground,  well  isolated 
from  other  fowl,  has  continued  to  yield  splendid  results.  Al- 
though no  culling  whatever  was  practiced  during  the  growing 
season,  less  than  2  per  cent,  of  the  pullets  were  unfit  for  the 
laying  houses.  Moreover,  such  measures  of  isolation  as  it  has 
been  possible  to  maintain  have  thus  far  secured  freedom  from 
roup  among  the  experimental  pullets. 

It  has  been  determined  that  crossing  over  takes  place  in  the 
sex  chromosomes  of  the  male  fowl. 

Student  Work. 
Each  year  several  seniors  undertake  a  minor  problem  of  in- 
vestigation from  which  interesting  preliminary  results  appear. 
Thus  Mr.  Flint  found  that  winter  egg  production  in  Rhode 
Island  Reds  was  independent  of  temperature.  Mr.  Graham 
found  that  the  length  of  a  bird's  laying  period  was  the  best 
index  of  total  production,  although  the  time  at  which  a  bird 
began  laying  (maturity)  was  also  a  good  index.  On  the  other 
hand,  rate  of  production  during  the  spring  months  did  not  prove 
to  be  a  good  index,  contrary  to  the  report  of  another  station. 


60a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 

As  a  master's  thesis  Mr.  Stewart  made  a  study  of  the  rate  of 
growth  of  chicks  in  relation  to  time  of  hatching.  Individual 
weights  were  made  monthly  on  nearly  a  thousand  chicks.  Rate 
of  growth  diminishes  progressively  from  March  to  May  hatches. 
This  work  bears  directly  on  time  of  maturity  and  hence  on  egg 
production. 


1918.1  PUBLIC   DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  61a 


DEPARTMENT  OF  VETERINARY  SCIENCE. 


JAMES  B.  PAIGE. 


During  the  past  year,  in  addition  to  carrying  on  the  usual 
activities  involved  in  the  receipt  and  examination  of  specimens 
of  pathological  material  constantly  coming  in,  reporting  upon  the 
findings,  and  the  usual  correspondence  incident  to  the  work  of 
the  department  among  the  stock  owners  of  the  State,  there  have 
been  maintained  three  different  lines  of  control  and  investiga- 
tional work,  namely :  — 

1.  Testing  of  fowl  for  the  detection  of  bacillary  white  diar- 
rhoea. 

2.  Investigations  relative  to  Bacterium  pidloniin  infection. 

.3.  The  value  of  anti-hog  cholera  serum  in  the  prevention  of 
hog  cholera. 

1.  Testing  of  Fowl  for  the  Detection  of  Bacillary 
White  Diarrhoea. 

The  blood  testing  has  been  done  by  Dr.  J.  B.  Lentz,  Dr. 
C.  T.  Buchholz  and  Dr.  G.  E.  Gage.  It  was  carried  on  by  Dr. 
Lentz  until  July  1,  when  he  enlisted  in  the  national  service  for 
the  duration  of  the  war.  He  is  now  on  leave  of  absence.  Dr. 
Buchholz  took  charge  of  the  work  on  July  1,  continuing  with  it 
until  September  15,  when  he  resigned  from  the  department  to 
engage  in  general  veterinary  practice.  At  this  date  there  was 
a  suspension  of  the  testing  until  it  was  taken  up  by  Dr.  Gage 
on  October  22,  and  carried  on  throughout  the  remainder  of  the 
year. 

Notwithstanding  the  several  breaks  and  interruptions  in  the 
work  during  the  year  the  records  on  file  in  the  department  show 
that  there  were  collected  and  tested  blood  samples  from  13,531 


62  a  EXPERBIENT  STATION.  [Jan. 

birds.  These  birds  belonged  to  more  than  103  different  owners 
of  poultry  in  70  different  cities  and  towns  of  the  State.  The 
average  percentage  of  reactors  among  something  like  26,000 
birds  tested  since  the  routine  test  was  started  in  1915  has  been 
found  to  be  13.5  per  cent.  It  is  gratifying  to  note,  in  the  case 
of  the  second  application  of  the  test  to  flocks  previously  tested, 
in  which  more  than  half  the  birds  gave  a  strong  reaction,  that 
the  disease  bacillarv  white  diarrha^a  has  been  eradicated. 


2.     Investigations    relative    to    Bacterium    Pullorum 

Infection. 

The  investigations  relative  to  Bacterium  indlornm  infection 
have  been  in  charge  of  Dr.  G.  E.  Gage.  Regarding  these 
studies  he  reports,  under  date  of  November  22,  as  follows :  — 

The  work  bearing  on  the  specificity  of  Bacterium  puHonim 
antibodies,  with  special  reference  to  the  agglutinins,  has  been 
completed,  and  will  be  published  in  the  near  future.  The  re- 
sults furnish  data  for  a  comparison  of  the  B.  imUoruin  antibodies 
with  those  of  the  B.  coJi-B.  ti/phi-B.  dysenterae  group  of  agglu- 
tinins, and  also  data  for  discussion  concerning  the  diagnostic 
value  of  the  agglutination  test. 

The  problem  concerning  the  production  of  toxin  by  Bacterium 
pullorum  has  received  most  of  the  time  at  my  disposal  for  ex- 
periment station  work  during  the  past  year.  This  has  proven 
a  very  difficult  task  in  that  the  determination  of  a  uniform 
grade  of  toxin  has  been  hard  to  obtain.  Data,  however,  are  at 
hand  which  are  of  interest  in  Bacterium  pullorum  studies,  and 
will  be  ready  for  publication  some  time  this  fall.  They  will  be 
published  under  some  such  heading  as  "The  Toxicity  of 
B.  pullorum  Products." 

The  investigation  concerning  the  production  of  antibodies, 
with  special  reference  to  the  potency  and  rate  of  production, 
started  in  August,  1916,  is  now  being  continued  as  outlined  at 
that  time.  At  the  present  time  a  large  number  of  birds,  de- 
scendants of  especially  immunized  individuals,  are  on  experi- 
ment. Attempts  are  being  made  to  study  the  progeny  this  year 
to  determine  potency  and  rate  factors  of  the  agglutinins  elab- 
orated in  such  birds  descended  from  stock  known  to  have  defi- 


191S.]  PUBLIC   DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  63a 

nite  infection.  This  problem  has  a  direct  bearing  upon  the 
routine  work  of  testing  breeding  flocks  for  indications  of 
Bacterium  yullorum  infection. 

3.  The  Value  of  Anti-hog  Cholera  Serum  in  the  Pre- 
vention OF  Hog  Cholera. 
The  hog  cholera  investigations,  carried  on  by  the  writer,  are 
being  prosecuted  according  to  the  general  plans  outlined  in  an 
earlier  report.  They  have  for  their  object  the  determination  of 
the  value  of  anti-hog  cholera  serum  in  the  production  of  immu- 
nity for  the  prevention  of  hog  cholera,  the  best  methods  of  appli- 
cation, and  the  development,  potency  and  continuance  of 
inherited  immunity.  For  use  in  these  studies  a  herd  of  from 
75  to  150  pigs  is  kept  that  is  fed  largely  upon  raw  garbage 
collected  about  the  town. 


BULLETiJsr  :n"o.  its. 


DEPARTMENT  OF  AGRICULTURAL  ECONOMICS. 


THE   COST   OF   DISTRIBUTING   MILK   IN    SIX 
CITIES  AND  TOWNS  OF  MASSACHUSETTS.^ 


BY  ALEXANDER  E.  CANCE,  PROFESSOR  OF  AGRICULTURAL  ECONOMICS,  AND 
RICHARD  HAY  FERGUSON,  EXTENSION  PROFESSOR  OF  AGRICULTURAL 
ECONOMICS,  MASSACHUSETTS  AGRICULTURAL  COLLEGE,  CO-OPERATING 
WITH  OFFICE  OF  MARKETS,  UNITED  STATES  DEPARTMENT  OF  AGRI- 
CULTURE. 


Foreword. 


The  facts  presented  in  this  bulletin  show  that  the  cost  of  distributing 
retail  milk  by  more  than  80  distributors,  some  of  them  producers,  some 
of  them  dealers,  was  2.64  cents  a  quart  in  1914  and  1915.  It  cost  42 
distributors  in  Worcester  and  Springfield  2.79  cents  a  quart  on  the  average. 

These  costs  included  (1)  all  labor  costs  —  labor  hired,  labor  of  the 
members  of  the  family,  labor  of  the  operator  and  proprietor  in  preparing 
the  milk  for  dehvery,  and  delivering  it  (labor  made  up  more  than  half  of 
the  total  cost) ;  (2)  all  depreciation  or  replacement  costs  on  all  buildings, 
equipment  and  horses  used  in  preparation  or  delivery;  (3)  all  maintenance 
charges,  or  cost  of  upkeep  of  plant  and  equipment  —  repairs,  oU,  bottles, 
etc. ;  (4)  all  overhead  or  fixed  charges  and  all  supplies  used  but  once  — 
rent,  interest,  taxes,  insurance,  license,  soap,  caps,  light,  fuel,  stationery, 
bad  debts,  spoilage,  etc.  The  charges  made  were  adequate  and  the  figures 
obtained  mean  that,  according  to  the  accounts  and  statements  of  85  dis- 
tributors, the  average  milkman  in  1914  and  1915  was  able  to  pay  himself 
wages  and  interest  and  account  for  all  expenses  and  losses  when  he  received 
from  his  retail  customers  2.64  cents  more  than  he  paid  for  a  quart  of  milk 
delivered  at  his  plant;  or  2.79  cents  if  he  lived  in  Springfield  or  Worcester. 

'  Practically  all  of  the  data  for  this  bulletin  were  personally  collected  by  the  late  Professor 
Richard  Hay  Ferguson,  who  was  responsible  also  for  most  of  the  tabulations  and  for  much  of  the 
bulletin  in  its  present  form.    Mr.  Ferguson  died  Dec.  1,  1915.    This  bulletin  was  his  last  work. 


2  MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    173. 

Prices  have  risen  since  1915.  Labor  and  supplies  of  all  kinds  are  higher. 
Just  how  much  the  increase  has  been  cannot  be  stated  with  accuracy. 
Retail  food  prices  have  advanced  nearly  30  per  cent.  Perhaps  25  per  cent, 
will  fully  cover  the  advance  in  milk-distributing  costs. 

Assuming  the  increase  to  be  25  per  cent,  the  cost  of  retailing  milk  in  the 
fall  of  1916  would  probably  average  3.30  cents  per  quart  for  all  distributors 
here  cited  and  3.49  cents  per  quart  for  the  milkmen  investigated  in 
Springfield  and  Worcester.  The  authors  vnli  not,  however,  vouch  for 
these  figures.  Actual  present  costs  may  be  Wgher  or  lower  than  3.30 
cents  or  3.49  cents. 

Introduction. 

It  is  well  known  that  for  a  number  of  j^ears  the  price  of  milk  to  the 
consumer  has  been  increasing.  Not  long  ago  milk  was  retailed  at  6  cents 
a  quart,  whereas  to-day  the  price  is  9,  10  and,  in  many  instances,  11  cents. 
Producers  complain  that  notwitlistanding  the  increased  price  paid  by 
consumers  they  are,  at  the  prices  paid  to  them,  producing  milk  at  a  loss 
and  unless  some  change  is  made  whereby  they  can  get  a  fair  return  for 


fimherst 
Pittsfield  • 


Vorcester 
'Springfield 


-Lr-"^ 


Location  of  Cities  and  Towns  Covered  in  this  Investigation. 

their  product,  the  whole  dairy  industry  in  Massachusetts  is  doomed.  On 
the  other  hand  the  consumers  view  with  alarm  the  increase  in  price  and 
cannot  understand  why  they  must  pay  10  cents  a  quart  for  milk  when  the 
producer  is  receiving  but  4^  to  5|  cents  net. 

The  Problem. 

The  milk  question  has  many  phases  and  many  relations.  Some  of  these 
have  been  indicated  in  the  very  enlightening  bulletin  on  the  milk  situation 
in  New  England,  issued  in  June,  1915,  by  the  Boston  Chamber  of 
Commerce. 

The  Massachusetts  Agricultural  College,  in  its  outline  of  the  problem, 
has  recognized  three  important  lines  of  study  and  investigation: 


COST   OF   DISTRIBUTING   MILK.  6 

1.  The  cost  and  methods  of  production. 

2.  Collection  and  primary  transportation  of  milk  and  cream. 

3.  Methods  and  costs  of  distributing;  i.e.,  preparing  for  delivery  and 
delivering  milk  and  cream. 

Closely  related  ^^^th  all  tliree  is  the  problem  of  milk  inspection. 

Problems  1  and  2  are  quite  as  important  as  No.  3,  the  cost  of  distri- 
bution, but  this  prehminary  study  deals  mainly  with  distribution  and 
incidentally  with  transportation.  Several  studies  have  been  made  of  the 
cost  of  producing  milk  in  the  North  Atlantic  States  but,  in  the  authors' 
opinion,  none  of  these  deal  with  the  problem  of  milk  production  on  the 
typical  dairy  farms  of  New  England  in  a  detailed  and  thoroughgoing 
way  over  a  sufficiently  long  period.^  Comparatively  little  serious  work 
has  been  done  on  the  methods  and  cost  of  transporting  milk. 

Co-operative  Investigation. 

The  Department  of  Agricultural  Economics  of  the  Massachusetts  Agri- 
cultural College  and  the  Office  of  Markets  of  the  United  States  Depart- 
ment of  Agriculture  formulated  a  plan  for  making  an  accurate,  first-hand 
study  of  milk  distribution  in  a  number  of  Massachusetts  cities  and  towns, 
perhaps  the  first  study  of  its  kind  ever  organized. 

The  data  used  in  this  study  were  collected  by  agents  of  the  Department 
of  Agricultural  Economics  and  the  Office  of  Markets  during  the  fall  of  1914 
and  the  winter  of  1915.  Altogether,  rather  accurate  data  were  obtained 
from  85  distributors  of  milk,  each  of  whom  was  visited  from  one  to  several 
times  in  order  to  obtain  as  reliable  figures  as  possible.  Several  of  the 
tabulations  were  made  by  the  Federal  Office  of  Markets,  where  all  the 
figures  were  checked. 

Scope  of  the  Investigation. 

Recognizing  the  fact  that  the  cost  of  distribution  may  vary  according 
to  the  size  and  location  of  a  town  or  city,  as  well  as  with  the  size  and 
method  of  doing  business,  it  was  decided  to  investigate  three  groups  of 
towns. 

Amherst  and  Walpole,  each  having  a  population  approximating  5,000,  — 
the  former  a  college  town  in  the  Connecticut  valley  and  the  latter  an 
industrial  center  in  the  southeastern  part  of  the  State,  —  were  chosen  as 
typifying  small  town  conditions  in  different  parts  of  Massachusetts.  Both 
Amherst  and  Walpole  draw  their  supply  of  milk  from  the  immediate 

'  Hanvood,  P.  M.:  What  it  costs  to  produce  Milk  in  New  England.  Mass.  State  Bd.  of  Agr. 
Cir.  No.  9.  Boston,  Mass.,  1914.  Hopper,  H.  A.,  and  Robertson,  F.  E.:  The  Cost  of  Milk  Pro- 
duction. Cornell  University  in  co-operation  with  Jefferson  County  Farm  Bureau,  Bui.  No. 
357.  Ithaca,  N.  Y.,  1915.  Lindsey,  J.  B.:  Record  of  the  Station  Dairy  Herd  and  the  Cost  of 
Milk  Production.  Mass.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  Bui.  No.  145.  Amherst,  Mass.,  1913.  Rasmussen,  Fred: 
Cost  of  Milk  Production.  New  Hampshire  Coll.  and  Exp.  Sta.  Exp.  Bui.  No.  2.  Durham, 
N.  H.,  1913.  Thompson,  A.  L.:  Cost  of  producing  Milk  on  174  Farms  in  Delaware  County, 
N.  Y.  Cornell  Univ.  Bui.  No.  364.  Ithaca,  N.  Y.,  1915.  Trueman,  J.  M.:  Records  of  a  Dairy 
Herd  for  Five  Years.    Storrs  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  Bui.  No.  73.    Storrs,  Conn..  1912. 


4  MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    173. 

neighborhood.  The  greater  portion  of  Amherst's  milk  is  distributed  by 
dealers,  while  that  of  Walpole  is  marketed  by  the  producers  themselves. 

Haverhill  and  Pittsfield,  industrial  centers  of  approximately  30,000 
population  each  — the  former  in  the  northeastern  part  of  the  State,  in 
the  midst  of  good  dairy  farms  which  supply  the  requirements  of  the  city, 
and  the  latter  in  the  heart  of  the  Berkshires  in  western  Massachusetts 
surrounded  mainly  by  the  homes  of  summer  residents  and  drawing  its 
milk  supply  from  a  greater  distance  —  form  the  second  group. 

Springfield  and  Worcester,  commercial  and  manufacturing  cities  of  over 
100,000  population,  constitute  the  third  group,  the  one  located  in  the  Con- 
necticut valley,  where  the  land  is  given  over  chiefly  to  the  raising  of 
tobacco,  onions  and  other  intensive  crops,  while  the  other  is  situated  in 
the  center  of  Massachusetts'  best  dairjang  county.  Naturally,  in  Worces- 
ter and  Haverhill  a  rather  large  portion  of  the  milk  is  distributed  by  the 
producers  themselves.  In  some  cases  the  producers  distribute  not  only 
the  product  of  their  own  dairies  but  also  that  of  neighboring  farmers,  thus 
in  a  measure  becoming  middlemen. 


Table  I.  —  Firms  interviewed,  classified  by  Location  and  Quantity  of  Retail 
and  Wholesale  Milk,  Cream  and  Ski7n  Milk  handled  daily. 


T) 

^S 

m 

(H 

(_ 

"aS 

m 

^ 

3 

$ 

oco 

Place. 

1 
Q 

3 

3 

<y 

a 

03 

—  S    . 

"ca 

C?^ 

g 

° 

e<) 

J5 

'ti^ 

2  == 

j^ 

j^ 

o 

% 

*us 

H 

eo 

CO 

g 

O 

< 

K 

Amherst,     .... 

5 

3 

2 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

Walpole,      . 

5 

3 

2 

- 

- 

- 

~ 

- 

Haverhill,   . 

22 

4 

8 

7 

1 

- 

- 

2 

Pittsfield,    . 

12 

3 

3 

2 

3 

- 

1 

- 

Worcester,   . 

31 

4 

10 

10 

3 

2 

1 

1 

Springfield, 

11 

3 

2 

2 

3 

1 

- 

- 

Totals,  . 

86 

20 

27 

21 

10 

3 

2 

3 

Per  cent,  of  number, 

100 

23 

31 

24 

12 

3.5 

3 

3,5 

Routes, 

170 

22 

38 

42 

38 

25 

2 

3 

In  each  locality  sufficient  typical  distributors  were  interviewed  to  insure 
the  reliability  of  the  figures  and  the  representative  nature  of  the  facts. 
The  distributors  interviewed  and  the  volume  of  business  represented  were 
as  follows :  — 


COST   OF   DISTRIBUTING   MILK. 


Place. 


Distributors 
interviewed. 


Quarts 
of  Milk  and 

Cream 
distributed 

daily. 


Total 
Number  of 
Distributors 
in  Locality. 


Total  Quarts 

daily 
Distribution 
Estimates. 


Amherst, 
Walpole,  ■ 
Pittsfield, 
Haverhill,   . 
Worcester,   . 
Springfield, 


1,320 
1,409 

7,690 
10,828 
22,809 
10,149 


5 

5 
46 
40 
167 
110 


20,000 
75,000 
65,000 


In  Amherst,  Walpole,  Haverhill  and  Pittsfield  about  60  per  cent,  of  the 
total  milk  distributed  is  represented.  In  Springfield  there  are  approxi- 
mately 65,000  quarts  distributed  daily,  and  in  Worcester  75,000.  The 
figures  presented  include  approximately  16  per  cent,  of  the  Springfield 
distribution  and  30  per  cent,  of  that  in  Worcester. 

Some  idea  of  the  size  of  the  milk  business  in  Worcester  and  Springfield 
and  the  number  and  character  of  distributors  may  be  gained  from  Tables 
II.  and  III.  These  figures  were  obtained  in  April  and  September,  1916. 
It  is  interesting  that  Springfield  is  suppUed  from  694  sources,  the  milk 
passing  through  the  hands  of  608  distributors  handling  a  daily  average  of 
27  gallons  each.  The  average  milkman  in  Springfield  sells  118  gallons  of 
milk  and  cream  daily;   in  Worcester,  107  gallons. 


Table  II.  —  Springfield,  Sources,  Quantities  and  Methods  of  seairing  City 
Milk  and  Cream  Supply. 


Number. 

Approximate  Daily 
Quantities. 

Number 
of  City 

Sources  of  Supply. 

Milk 
(Gallons). 

Cream 
(Gallons). 

Dealers 
supplied 
directly. 

Producers  hauling  to  city, 
Individual  producers  shipping  to  city,  . 
Country  creameries  and  milk  stations,  . 
Farmers'  stations, 

15 

650 
24 
5 

1,025 
14,480 

25 
500 

- 

Totals 

694 

15,505^ 

525 

560 

6 


MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    173. 


o 


^ 


CO 


m 
< 


03 

lO 

o 

o 

"5 

o 

lO 

\n 

rs  c 

o 

o 

■So 

Oi 

^ 

00_ 

00 

o 

cc 

0=3 

03 

H^ 

e 

»o 

1 

o 

lA 

o 

•o 

lf5 

c^ 

■A 

£ 

CO 

lO 

^ 

O 

>J 

< 
a 

Q 

V. 

o 

1 

lO 

1 

1 

1 

1 

IC 

<Q 

'^r^ 

t- 

r^ 

03 

ss 

z 

u 

o 

d 

< 

•c 

O 

i^  . 

fa 

S-^ 

1 

1 

1 

o 

1 

1 

o 

o 

o--- 

o 

o 

» 

Is 

CO 

CO 

H 

^'^ 

n 

fe 

0 

iz; 

Id 

s 

g 

1 

1 

1 

1 

s 

'" 

N 

K 

o 

« 

■a 

CL, 

03 

<J 

•  S 

1 

1 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

t-^ 

o 

»o 

>o 

o 

3^5 

o 

o 

t^ 

t^ 

o_ 

03 '^ 

esT 

" 

Ui 

OS 

PM 

o 

ifi 

o 

o 

o 

o 

lO 

Id 

u^ 

00 

lO 

lO 

W5 

CO 

t^ 

s 

OS 

r* 

M 

^1 

CO 

o 

l-l 

■D          7J 

j^       a> 

in 

N 

t^ 

1 

1 

1 

■* 

a  o| 

M 

■^ 

^       « 

M     .     03 

£  m  b 

ift 

C<l 

115 

00 

o 

00 

oo 

t^ 

o 

o 

§ 

p^^ 

:z:®-5 

ai 

« 

o 

El 

D 

n 

« 

H 

03 

0) 

G 

Q 

2 

\4 

i 

hj 

*s 

a 

i 

s 

b 

1 

T3 

O 

$ 

§ 

a? 

Ui 

03 

a 

O 

:;3 

8 

m 

<! 

1 

.2 

"3 

.2 

03 

o 

1      « 

o 

"3 

i 
i 

C3 

s 

"a 
o 
Eh 

COST    OF   DISTRIBUTING   MILK. 


s 


SI. 


-is 


h3 


E  o2 
3      q 


12;   P 


fi   o 


8 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    173. 


Pkocessing  Costs  and  Delivery  Costs. 

The  costs  of  distributing  milk  fall  naturally  into  two  classes  —  prepa- 
ration for  delivery  or  processing,  and  delivery  to  customers.  The  trans- 
portation of  milk  from  the  producer  to  the  dealer  is  an  additional  item 
of  expense,  but  usually  the  producer  deUvers  his  milk  to  the  dealer.  In 
this  study  the  transportation  cost  has  not  been  considered.  The  anal3''sis 
of  costs  begins  with  the  preparation  of  the  milk  for  dehvery  and  ends 
with  the  collection  of  monej''  from  customers. 

Simple  as  this  analysis  appears,  a  number  of  items  cannot  well  be 


idlaA 


Distribution 


Balance 

lOO     ~ 


Cost  of  Distribution 

^    79     1 

franspontation       /  xlioo  * 


""Cost  ofTra  noportc  t  ion 


Farmer  Receives 
4ioo  + 


U  V 


When  the  consumer  pays  9  cents. 


charged  exclusively  either  to  preparation  or  to  delivery  —  administration 
and  clerical  expenses,  light,  telephone,  etc.;  insurance  and  taxes,  perhaps; 
slu-inkage,  spoilage  and  bad  debts.  In  the  summary  of  costs  these  have 
been  called  "overhead"  expenses;  usually  they  might  well  be  distributed 
between  processing  and  delivery. 

From  the  standpoint  of  health,  pure,  clean  milk  is  as  necessary  as  a  good 
water  supply.  Milk  just  drawn  from  a  healthy  cow  under  sanitary  con- 
ditions is  at  its  best,  and  could  it  reach  the  consumer  in  tliis  condition  it 
would  be  ideal.  To  preserve  it  and  to  overcome  the  bad  effects  of  un- 
healthy stock,  unsanitary  methods  and  conditions  in  the  barn  and  reduce 
to  a  minimum  the  unavoidable  deterioration  in  handling,  transit  and 
storage,  milk  has  to  be  "prepared"  for  the  customer.  This  preparation 
may  be  called  "processing,"  and,  so  far  as  the  distributors  interviewed 


COST   OF   DISTRIBUTING   MILK.  9 

were  concerned,  consists  cliiefly  in  cooling  the  milk  and  bottling,  i.e., 
wasliing,  filling  and  capping  the  bottles.  Milk  is  almost  universally  deliv- 
ered to  the  consumer  in  bottles;  in  fact,  only  one  instance  of  dipped 
milk  was  discovered;  this  was  in  Worcester. 

In  addition  to  this,  however,  some  of  the  larger  dealers  clarify  their  milk 
by  running  it  through  a  machine  which  removes  the  visible  dirt,  or  pas- 
teurize it  to  retard  bacterial  development.  This  materially  adds  to  the 
cost  of  processing.  Tables  II  and  III  show  that  only  a  minor  percentage 
of  the  milk  distributed  in  Springfield  is  pasteurized. 

In  Haverliill,  of  20  distributors  visited,  but  2  had  pasteurizers.  In 
Springfield  16  were  visited  and  but  1  had  a  pasteurizer  and  clarifier.  In 
Worcester  35  were  visited;  2  had  pasteurizers  and  2  others  possessed 
clarifiers.  Some  few  distributors  produced  milk  under  unusually  good  sani- 
tary conditions,  almost  always  keeping  the  bacterial  count  much  lower 
than  in  ordinary  milk.  This  they  called  "special"  milk,  and  maintained 
that  processing  other  than  cooling  and  bottling  was  unnecessary  and  that 
pasteurizing  was  more  likely  to  prove  harmful  than  helpful  to  their  trade. 
Under  ordinary  conditions  the  investment  in  processing  machinery  was 
very  small  indeed,  and  the  labor  involved  in  caring  for  the  milk  was  con- 
fined to  the  most  ordinary  precautions  to  prevent  souring. 

Difficulties  in  obtaining  Data. 

Many  difficulties  were  met  in  securing  the  necessary  data  to  determine 
the  cost  of  distribution.  Very  few  producers  or  dealers  kept  proper  books; 
in  fact,  any  sort  of  bookkeeping  was  the  exception  rather  than  the  rule. 
CompHcations  also  arose  when  the  producer  distributed  the  milk,  for  it 
was  difficult  to  separate  the  items  of  production  and  distribution,  the 
stable,  shed,  horse  and  harness  being  used  for  both.  In  many  cases,  there- 
fore, estimates  only  could  be  given,  but  great  care  was  taken  that  such 
estimates  should  cover  the  actual  cost.  The  figures  quoted  are  fairly 
accurate,  and  those  on  the  cost  of  distribution  of  "special"  milk  can  be 
relied  upon  in  every  detail,  since  most  fortunately  these  distributors  have 
kept  accurate  records  for  a  period  of  several  years. 

Mixed  Business.  —  The  greatest  problem,  however,  that  confronted  the 
investigators  arose  from  the  fact  that  in  almost  all  cases  the  distributors 
not  only  deliver  bottled  milk  directly  to  the  individual  consumer,  but 
deliver  wholesale  milk  both  in  bottles  and  in  cases  to  other  retailers  and 
restaurants  and  also  deliver  cream  both  wholesale  and  retail.  By  good 
fortune  figures  were  obtained  from  a  dealer  who  kept  accurate  cost  accounts 
and  dealt  entirely  in  wholesale  milk.  His  accounts  show  that  it  cost  him 
three-quarters  of  a  cent  (S0.0076)  per  quart  to  collect  his  milk  from  pro- 
ducers and  distribute  it  in  wholesale  quantities.  This  figure  is  not  appli- 
cable in  most  instances,  however,  for  the  reason  that  ordinarily  the  dis- 
tributor does  not  go  out  of  his  way  to  deliver  his  wholesale  milk;  that  is 
to  say,  liis  route  is  no  longer  and  his  apparent  costs  vary  but  little,  whether 
he  dehvers  retail  milk  only  or  adds  a  few  wholesale  deliveries.    Careful 


10  MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    173. 

thought  indicates  that  an  allowance  of  one-half  cent  per  quart  for  whole- 
sale milk  delivered  by  a  retail  dealer  covers  the  cost  of  this  service  in  most 
instances;  consequently  this  figure  has  been  uniformly  used. 

This  method  of  accounting,  which  very  evidently  lays  the  burden  of 
costs  on  the  retailed  milk  and  rather  arbitrarily  estabUshes  the  costs  of 
incidental  wholesale  distribution,  is  presented  with  full  recognition  of  its 
weakness  and  its  limitations.  It  does  not  mean  that  wholesale  milk  can  be 
delivered  at  this  cost,  nor  that  a  mixed  business  should  not  be  considered 
on  its  merits;  but  it  is  manifestly  unfair  to  assume  that  it  costs  as  much 
to  deliver  200  quarts  at  wholesale  to  two  customers  as  to  deliver  200  quarts 
at  retail  to  200  customers;  and,  since  three-fourths  of  the  quantity  is 
retailed  and  nine-tenths  of  the  equipment  is  for  retailing,  the  arbitrary 
figures  given  are  very  reasonable  interpretations  of  the  facts. 

The  same  question  arises  as  to  the  delivery  of  retail  cream.  Based 
somewhat  on  the  cost  of  delivering  retail  milk  and  estimating  filling,  cap- 
ping, boxing  and  icing,  loss  of  bottles  and  other  contingent  expenses,  a 
charge  of  3  cents  per  quart  is  deducted  for  its  distribution.  These  deduc- 
tions may  be  open  to  criticism  but  they  were  reached  after  making  full 
investigations  and  obtaining  the  opinions  of  many  distributors. 

Analysis  op  Costs. 

Cost  data  may  be  grouped  vmder  comparatively  few  heads :  — 

1.  Investment  in  land,  buildings,  horses  and  all  equipment  that  is 
more  or  less  permanent  in  its  nature. 

2.  Depreciation  on  buildings  and  equipment. 

3.  Maintenance  of  plant  and  equipment. 

4.  Circulating  capital,  i.e.,  current  operating  supplies  used  but  once  — 
fuel,  soap,  ice,  etc.;  and  "  overhead,"  i.e.,  fixed  charges,  rent,  insurance, 
taxes,  etc. 

5.  Labor. 

As  previously  noted  these  items  may  be  assigned  to  processing,  deUvery 
and  overhead  or  to  processing  and  delivery. 

Investment. 

Investment  includes  the  inventory  value  of  real  estate,  horses  and 
equipments  used  in  the  processing  or  delivery  of  milk  and  the  housing  of 
the  horses  and  equipment.  Depreciation  was  reckoned  on  aU  items  of 
investment  and  was  charged  for  one  year.  Some  specific  problems  may 
be  mentioned. 

Depreciation  Problems. 

Horses.  —  No  hard  and  fast  rule  was  followed  in  determining  the  depre- 
ciation of  horses.  It  was  asserted  by  many  that  a  horse  worth  $300  after 
giving  ten  years'  service  could  be  sold  for  $100;  after  five  years'  ser^^ce, 
for  $200,  thus  gi^^ng  an  annual  depreciation  in  each  case  of  $20.  Some 
distributors  affirmed  that  no  depreciation  of  horse  flesh  could  honestly  be 


COST   OF   DISTRIBUTING   MILK.  11 

charged,  since  they  usually  disposed  of  their  horses  after  three  or  four  years 
for  more  than  they  cost.  Other  animals  eighteen  and  twenty  years  of  age 
were  giving  good  ser\ice. 

Rate  of  Depreciation.  —  For  these  reasons  each  individual  case  was 
dealt  with  on  its  merits  under  this  general  formula:  first  cost  of  animal, 
less  the  selling  price  or  the  present  worth,  divided  by  number  of  years  of 
service  equals  the  annual  depreciation.  This  method  of  calculation  takes 
no  account  of  losses  by  death;  only  horses  now  in  service  are  considered. 
Where  such  losses  had  occurred  in  recent  years  some  allowance  was  made, 
however.  The  figures  obtained  show  that  the  depreciation  of  horse  flesh 
increased  in  proportion  to  the  size  of  the  town  or  city,  and  also  of  the  load 
hauled.  In  Amherst  and  Walpole  annual  horse  depreciation  averaged  7.5 
per  cent.      In  Worcester  the  average  was  9.5  per  cent. 

Buildiyigs.  —  To  compute  the  investment  in  buildings  and  the  necessary 
allowance  for  depreciation  was  also  a  source  of  some  difficulty.  In  Walpole 
and  Worcester  a  number  of  dairies  were  housed  in  basements,  some  in 
basements  of  residences.  Moreover,  the  majority  of  the  country  dairies 
visited  are  in  the  barn,  stable  or  shed,  a  partitioned  space  in  these  buildings 
being  all  that  is  considered  necessary  for  the  plant.  In  all  these  instances 
an  estimate  was  made  of  the  value  of  the  whole  building;  this  was  multi- 
plied by  the  fractional  space  occupied  by  the  milk  plant  and  to  this  was 
added  the  outlay  for  fitting  up  the  plant  itself.  When  the  valuation  was 
arrived  at,  3  per  cent.,  as  a  rule,  was  charged  off  for  depreciation;  2  per 
cent,  for  taxes  and  insurance;  and  5  per  cent,  for  interest.  This  may  be 
a  trifle  high,  but  in  some  cases  the  actual  charges  for  taxes  and  insurance 
were  more  than  2  per  cent. 

Equipment.  —  The  equipment  varied  exceedingly,  but  without  exception 
fairly  reliable  data  were  obtained.  No  arbitrary  rule  was  followed  in  com- 
puting the  depreciation,  since  each  individual  item  has  a  different  period 
of  service  and  these  periods  vary  with  the  different  plants  and  users. 
Many  distributors  had  experience  sufficient  to  enable  the  investigator  to 
arrive  at  a  fairly  exact  figure;  in  other  plants  estimates  were  necessary. 
In  a  number  of  cases  the  equipment  was  very  meager  and  the  methods 
employed  crude;  filling  bottles  by  hand,  heating  water  over  a  small  gas 
burner,  and  washing  bottles  by  hand  were  not  unusual.  Except  in  the  case 
of  the  large  dealers  in  the  cities  and  a  few  of  the  more  progressive  pro- 
ducers who  distribute,  live  steam  was  not  used  for  washing  or  sterilizing 
and  in  several  cases  the  heating  apparatus  was  entirely  inadequate. 

Harness.  —  The  almost  unanimous  opinion  was  that  the  life  of  a  set 
of  harness  costing  from  $35  to  $40  is  five  years,  provided  it  is  kept  in 
good  repair;  the  repairs  usually  amount  to  $5  a  year.  This  bears  out  the 
statement  of  harness  makers  that  harness  costs  $1  a  month. 

Wagons  and  Sleighs.  —  There  was  very  little  difference  of  opinion  re- 
garding the  upkeep  and  life  of  wagons  and  pungs.  The  price  of  wagons 
ranged  from  $175  to  $275,  with  a  Ufe  of  approximately  eight  years.  They 
are  usually  varnished  every  year  and  painted  and  overhauled  every  alter- 


12  MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    173. 

nate  year.    Pungs  or  sleighs  cost  an  average  of  S50  and  last  about  fifteen 
years,  very  little  being  spent  on  upkeep. 

Other  Equipment.  —  Boxes  worth  80  cents  to  $1.25  are  good  for  five 
years.  There  is  a  difference  of  opinion  as  to  the  relative  merits  of  the 
wooden  and  the  steel  boxes.  Five  complete  sets  of  cans  are  necessary 
for  the  average  dealer,  one  set  being  replaced  each  year.  This  item,  how- 
ever, should  be  charged  to  transportation  except  in  the  case  of  the  deUvery 
of  wholesale  milk. 

Maintenance. 

Maintenance  includes  the  expenditure  necessary  for  the  repair  and 
upkeep  of  the  buildings  and  equipment,  including  feed  of  horses  and  the 
loss  of  bottles  and  cans.  In  general,  the  outlay  necessary  to  maintain  the 
plant  in  working  order  is  maintenance.  Such  items  as  grease  and  oil, 
veterinary  service,  shoeing,  stable  sundries,  brushes,  brooms,  blankets, 
feed  bags,  carriers,  hose,  medicine,  paint  and  other  sundries  required  to 
keep  up  the  buildings  and  equipment  fall  under  this  head. 

Working  Capital. 

Working  capital  (or  overhead  and  current  supplies)  includes  such  items 
as  soap,  ice,  hght,  fuel,  stationery,  telephone,  rent,  insurance,  taxes, 
interest  on  investment,  spoilage,  surplus,  shrinkage  and  bad  bills.  It  was 
difficult  in  many  cases  to  separate  these  items,  spoilage  and  surplus  being 
included  by  some  in  shrinkage  and  by  others  in  bad  bills;  fuel  was  con- 
sumed for  other  purposes  than  the  dairy;  the  telephone  included  private 
use;  and  insurance,  taxes  and  water  rates  often  covered  the  residence  or 
buildings  used  for  other  purposes  in  addition  to  the  dairy.  Assessed  values 
and  tax  rates  vary  greatly,  but  in  general  2  per  cent,  of  the  actual  value 
was  allocated  to  taxes  and  insurance.  Insurance  averaged  about  I5  per 
cent,  for  three  years.  Interest  was  uniformly  computed  at  5  per  cent,  on 
the  entire  investment. 

Labor. 

Labor  is  classified  as  hired,  home  and  personal.  Home  labor  is  labor 
provided  by  members  of  the  family,  such  as  assistance  in  the  dairy  or  on 
the  milk  wagon,  but  more  often  in  keeping  the  books.  Usually  home 
labor  does  not  represent  an  expenditure,  but  is  charged  at  the  prevailing 
rates.  Personal  labor  is  the  labor  of  the  proprietor  himself  and  is  valued 
at  his  own  estimate,  never  less  than  25  cents  per  hoar.  In  no  case  was 
the  accepted  estimate  considered  excessive  or  below  a  reasonable  remun- 
eration. 
■  There  is  much  individual  variation  in  each  of  these  items,  especially 
among  the  producers  who  board  the  hired  help.  The  wages  paid  varied 
from  $25  to  $35  per  month  and  board;  the  estimates  for  board  vary  from 
$15  to  $30  per  month.  The  time,  too,  must  often  be  distributed  more  or 
less  unequally  and  arbitrarily  between  farm  work  and  the  preparation  and 
delivery  of  milk.  In  all  instances  these  adjustments  were  made  carefully, 
but  except  as  averages  they  cannot  be  considered  in  all  respects  infallible. 


Table  IV.  —  Summary  of  Total  Costs,  and  Cost  per  1,000  Quarts,  of  distributing  Milk  and  Cream  [Forty-two  Plants). 


Value  of  — 

Total. 

Horses. 

Milk 
Sheds. 

lee 
Houses. 

Stables. 

Boilers. 

Pumps. 

Tanks. 

Washers. 

Fillers. 

Pasteur- 

Clarifiers. 

Separators. 

Ice  Chests. 

Hameaaee. 

Wagons. 

PungB. 

Boxes. 

Cans. 

Office. 

Sundries. 

Per  1,000 
Quarts. 

Amount. 

Investment:  — 

Total 

Per  1,000  quarts, 

«37,913  00 
3  07 

(26,002  00 
2  16 

(7,320  00 
61 

(24,333  34 

(7,743  92 

(1,560  00 

(220  00 

(4,755  00 

(5,508  00 

(4,310  00 

(1,240  00 

(410  00 

(2,523  50       (6,121  00 
61 

(25,871  00 
2  15 

(6,731  00 
56 

(2,997  55 
25 

(2,629  70 
22 

(1,340  00 

(545  OO 

(14  15 

(170,154  01 

Depreciation:  — 

Total 

Per  1,000  quarts, 

»3,971  71 
33 

(780  06 
06 

(359  60 
03 

(730  00 

(764  58 

(150  00 

(16  00 

(481  00 

(509  73 

(407  33 

(116  00 

(41  00 

(203  73 

(1,372  93 
11 

(3,787  85 
31 

(397  56 
03 

(676  82 
05 

(376  29 
03 

(132  00 

(64  50 

(1*28 
4  56 

3  83 
12  77 

(15,338  69 

Repairs. 

Sundries. 

Shoeing. 

Feed. 

Carriers. 

Bottles.          Cans. 

Maintenance:  — 

(6,896  31 
58 

(3,788  31       (4,193  80 
31                  35 

(31,773  52 
2  64 

(184  67       (7,666  92          (493  85 
02                  63                  04 

54,897  41 

Per  1,000  quarts, 

Rent. 

Soap. 

Caps. 

Ice. 

Light  and 
Oil. 

Fuel. 

Stationery. 

Insurance 
and 
Taxes. 

Interest. 

Spoilage 

and 

Shrinkage. 

Bad  BiUs. 

Sundries. 

Circulating  capital:  — 

(3,324  00 
28 

(1,122  07 
09 

(2,519  19 
21 

(7,376  45 
61 

(1,578  39 
13 

(3,872  60 
32 

(1,934  45 
16 

(3,288  72 
27 

(8,326  21 
69 

(2,938  70 
24 

(6,560  52 
65 

(3,227  74 
27 

Per  1,000  quarts. 

Labor:  - 

153,597  45 

(22  44 

(269,902  50 

Milk  Distriddted. 


Retail:  — 

Daily  (quarts). 24.421,70 

Yearly  (quarts), 8,913,925.00 

Wholesale:  — 

Yearly  (quarts) 2,890,59500 

Yearly  (quarts) 222.344  00 

Total  yearly  ooat  of  retail  distribution $248,809.39 

Cost  per  quart  retail  distribution  (cents), 2.79 


Miles  travelled  daily,  retail, 
Cost  per  mile  (cents),  retail,    . 
Quarts  per  mile  daily,  retail,    . 
Quarts  per  customer  daily,  retail, 
Quarts  per  horse  daily,  retail,  . 
Miles  per  customer,  retail. 
Customers:  — 

Wholesale,      .... 

Retail,  .... 


5  s 


p     o 


<    H 


COST    OF    DISTRIBUTING    MILK.  13 


Costs  of  Processing  and  Delivering  summarized. 

Table  IV  is  an  itemized  summary  of  costs  tabulated  for  42  plants  in 
Springfield  and  Worcester.  Facts  obtained  in  these  cities  are  fairly  com- 
parable and  the  conclusions  are  quite  as  satisfactory  as  if  the  data  for 
all  six  localities  were  included  in  the  tabulations.  The  summary  represents 
an  annual  business  of  approximately  9,000,000  quarts  of  retail  milk, 
3,000,000  quarts  of  wholesale  milk  and  222,000  quarts  of  cream  out  of  a 
total  distribution  of  about  15,000,000  quarts  of  retail  milk,  4,700,000 
quarts  of  wholesale  milk  and  300,000  quarts  of  cream  —  or  about  60  per 
cent,  of  the  total  deliveries  considered  in  this  investigation.  The  milk  of 
these  42  distributors  was  dehvered  to  about  21,000  customers. 

The  total  investment  in  plants  and  equipments  amounts  to  about  I5 
cents  per  quart  of  milk  dehvered.  The  largest  investment  items  are  milk 
sheds,  horses  and  stables;  boilers  and  ice  houses  come  next  but  are  com- 
paratively insignificant. 

The  chief  items  of  depreciation  apply  to  horses,  wagons  and  harness. 
These  account  for  three-fifths  of  the  total  depreciation;  another  fifth  is 
assigned  to  milk  shed,  stable,  boxes,  cans  and  boiler.  By  ascertaining  the 
first  cost,  the  present  value  and  the  time  used,  most  of  the  items  of  depre- 
ciation are  easily  calculated. 

Nearly  $55,000  is  classified  under  maintenance.  More  than  three-fifths 
of  this  is  for  horse  feed  and  just  about  80  per  cent,  is  for  feed,  repairs 
and  horseshoeing.  Lost  bottles  and  cans  are  classified  as  maintenance 
and  make  up  most  of  the  remainder. 

Circulating  or  working  capital  is  here  used  to  include  overhead  and  fixed 
charges  and  supplies  which  are  destroyed  in  one  using.  The  largest  item 
is  interest  on  the  investment,  computed  at  5  per  cent.;  the  second  is  ice; 
and  the  third  is  bad  bills.  These  items,  with  rent,  insurance  and  taxes, 
fuel  and  loss  by  spoilage  and  shrinkage,  account  for  75  per  cent,  of  this 
charge.  Other  items  are  soap,  caps,  stationery,  light  and  oil.  Labor  of 
all  kinds  is  by  far  the  largest  item,  amounting  to  nearly  three-fifths  of 
the  entire  cost,  or  one  and  three-fifths  cents  per  quart  of  milk  retailed. 

The  average  cost  of  processing  and  retailing  milk  is  2.79  cents  per  quart 
for  an  average  daily  deUvery  of  175  quarts  of  retailed  milk  per  horse  the 
year  round.  This  cost  is  arrived  at  by  deducting  from  the  total  expenses 
one-half  cent  a  quart  for  the  wholesale  milk  distributed  and  3  cents  a 
quart  for  retail  cream. 


14 


MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    173. 


Table  V.  —  Cost  per  Quart  and  Percentage  of  Total  Cost  for  Deprecia- 
tion, Maintenance,  Circulating  Capital  and  Labor. 


Depreciation, 
Maintenance, 
Circulating  capital, 
Labor, 

Preparation, 
Delivery,  . 
Overhead,    . 


Percentage. 

5.69 
20.34 
17.06 
56.91 
100. 00 

27.19 

55.14 

17.67 

100.00 


Costs  classified  by  Size  and  Kind  of  Business, 

Perhaps  a  better  analysis  of  80  plants  is  presented  in  Table  VI.  In  this 
analysis  an  attempt  has  been  made  to  classify  the  distributors  by  size  of 
business  and  to  set  forth  the  items  of  cost  under  processing,  delivery  and 
overhead. 

Only  three  plants  do  a  business  exceeding  2,000  quarts  daily,  hence  the 
figures  for  these  must  be  used  with  caution.  Sixty  plants  do  a  mixed 
business,  about  three-fourths  retail  and  one-fourth  wholesale.  Twenty 
plants  deliver  retail  milk  only.  None  of  the  all-retail  plants  do  a  daily 
business  of  500  quarts.  They  are  of  one  and  two  wagon  capacity  and  so 
far  as  size  of  business  is  concerned  should  be  classified  with  the  "under 
500"  group. 

The  actual  per  quart  costs,  which  include  both  wholesale  and  retail  milk, 
run  from  about  L6  to  2.9  cents  per  quart.  The  discrepancy  between  per 
quart  costs  given  in  Tables  IV,  V  and  VI  is  accounted  for  by  the  fact  that 
in  Table  IV  only  42  firms  are  considered  and  the  cost  of  distributing  all 
wholesale  milk  is  computed  at  one-half  cent  per  quart. 

Plants  of  500  to  1,000  quarts  capacity  do  business  most  economically  — 
1.64  cents  a  quart  for  all  milk  delivered  and  2.05  cents  per  quart  for  miUc 
retailed.  These  costs  are  25  per  cent,  and  22  per  cent.,  respectively, 
below  the  average  of  all  the  plants  investigated  (2.21  cents  for  all  deliveries 
and  2.64  cents  for  retailed  milk).  Plants  of  1,000  to  2,000  quarts  dis- 
tribute for  1.82  and  2.23  cents  per  quart.  The  27  plants  of  less  than  500 
quarts  daily  capacity  average  2.04  and  2.66  cents  a  quart.  The  3  plants 
doing  a  mixed  business  of  more  than  2,000  quarts  daily  and  the  20 
exclusively  retail  plants  show  the  highest  per  quart  costs  for  retailing  — • 
2.92  and  2.93  cents  for  all  expenses. 


COST    OF    DISTRIBUTING    MILK.  15 

The  overhead  expense  is  the  smallest  item  and  in  reality  should  be  dis- 
tributed between  processing  and  delivery.  It  varies  from  12.3  to  18.9  per 
cent,  of  the  total  cost  in  mixed,  and  14.7  per  cent,  in  retail  business. 
This  item  seems  to  vary  directly  -nith  the  size  of  the  business,  i.e.,  with 
the  quantity  handled.  The  processing  expense  runs  from  24.7  to  31.8  per 
cent,  of  the  total.  In  general  this  expense  varies  inversely  with  the  quan- 
tity handled.  Delivery  costs  a  little  more  than  one-half  of  the  total, 
running  rather  uniformly  around  55  per  cent.  The  1,000  to  2,000  quart 
group  averaged  57.7  per  cent,  for  delivery  but  the  individual  variations 
are  wide.  On  the  whole  the  figures  show  comparatively  little  correlation 
between  costs  and  size  of  business. 

Investment  and  Size  of  Business. 

The  relation  between  size  of  business  and  average  total  amount  invested 
in  plant  and  equipment  is  of  interest.  The  tabulations  in  Table  VII.,  as 
might  be  expected,  show  a  consistent  correlation  between  investment  and 
size  of  business.  But  when  the  investment  per  1,000  quarts  of  milk  dis- 
tributed is  considered,  this  consistent  correlation  is  not  shown.  The  strik- 
ingly high  investment  ($22.61  per  1,000  quarts)  of  the  retail  dealers  is, 
perhaps,  rather  surprising  when  compared  with  an  investment  of  $4.30 
per  1,000  quarts  in  plants  during  a  mixed  business  of  the  same  size.  Enter- 
prises of  the  second  and  fourth  classes  have  also  a  very  high  investment 
ratio.  One  might  suppose  that  a  milk-distributing  plant  could  increase 
its  volume  of  business  by  corresponding  increase  in  plant,  but  an  increase 
from  an  average  of  360  quarts  per  day  to  an  average  of  710  quarts  a  day 
seems  to  multiply  the  total  investment  nearly  six  times,  whereas  men 
who  do  a  retail  business  exclusively  have  four  times  the  total  investment 
of  those  who  do  a  mixed  business  of  the  same  size. 


16 


MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    173. 


•—I 


.<=» 


H 

■f§ 

1*:; 

-^ 

b' 

e 

CO 

e 

2: 

f^ 

<w 

5* 

•-H 

•po 

T^ 

"2 

« 

!53 

so 

<i^ 

T3 

!C 

60 

CO 

^ 

^ 

5; 

A 

?! 

,H 

1*5 

g 

e 
^ 


^ 


n 

<! 


N  CO  C^        i-«  O 


>. 

IOCS 

03 

0 

Q 

'- 

>, 

-c. 

IM  -H 

s 

e 

< 

Ui         OS  05  O         -^i^ 


COC5  1-1        10 


oi      iftcqeo      00 

00      coosoo      ^-^ 

o 

to     eoust^      b-o 

CO        O-Ht^        Oi      • 
CO        »-iTj*cD        1— 


00        OO-***  ■^        CD  U5 

00        t*  tDi-i        iC  CO 

O 

CO         Q5  CO  ^D         CS  O 


t. 

la 

0 

<: 

0:3 

■oS 

J3  0 

<1 

■sw 

H 

B  S.! 


5  = 


_6 

!!§ 

S  2  9 

J"  B>  c  S 


i«  ICO      o»o 


10        CO  ^^  U3 


C^  OCO        05  O 
O— .0        -HO 


O        00000       CO  o 

o      *-i  -^^  o      coco 


00        -H  »JO  iO        -H 


CO  — eo      Otji 


-H  00  t>-co 

c<>  c^  cor^ 

-H  C^  00  Oi 

— I  cs  eooo 


g  Is 

°  a  a 
>.  ftrt 
«  o  C 

w  r^  o 
>  £?-5 
•J  ®  2 

H  ^  »._   . 

PT>  fe  0.0 

(^  3  IS 


»  3 


COST    OF    DISTRIBUTING    MILK. 


17 


C-1 

oo       -^ 

o 

1        ?i       c5 

o 

o      o 

r^  ooic  o  o  »o 

-*co 

OS        CO        CO 

oooocooo  ao 

CO  o 

TJI           Ci           C3 

■*oc«  ooooco 

CD  ■«*<  C^  W^  '-' 

CO       o       o 

CO      • 

lO 

o 

M> 

mi^Mr-t^oo 

CO         O         CJ 

COtO  O  O  O  CO 

CO  -3^ 
ICO 

O        ^        Ci 

if5  lO  o  (M  ^  cr> 

ooo 

o 

■»J<^MCOCl  CO  O 

o 

t^ 

CO 

«0 

6^ 

lO  CO  COi«b-iO 

t*         <N         CO 

MMOOOt^Ol 

C-)  CO 

cs       oo       <ri 

o 

^■*OOOCO 

■^      o      o 

in    • 

o 

OT— 1  Jq  «C^C^ 

r-^ 

o 

00  -^  0»0  Ci  "^ 

oo 

tr^       '^       ir> 

•<»<  Tf<  00  CO  >0  C^ 

C5         CD         O 

o 

lO  CO  00  — 1  1^  CO 

ooo 

(MOO 

C-J  ■>»<  CO  O  -^  CO 

!>. 

CO                          ^  ^H 

t^ 

w? 

2 

eootooo-*o 

Old 

-<tJ<-hOOOCO 

oc^ 

ooo 

1 

o 

OJ         C-) 

M  m  lo  CO  c<i  oo 

t~o 

■^      o      o 

CO  -^  ^  c^  w^  r) 

IM      • 

o 

CO 

«» 

«& 

■3    •-«    •  5-    • 

03        C3        S 

■S     -^     ^ 

b    ■  t.    .-g    . 

V      o      c 

>    >    s 

o      o      " 

^  -^  ■«  • 

g  §  1? 

>>■&'■?■ 

•  ^      •«— 1      •   CI      • 

t;      oj 

< 

■§•«>: 

.      b    . 

paration, 

eparation 

a!7  delive 
wholesale 

■i . 

C3  O 

>  • 
o 

cT      '^ 

a      o  o 

Lh 

verago  total   costs  for 

charges, 

otal  costs  per  quart  for 

charges, 

otal  costs  per  quart  for 

quart  for  milk  delivered 

VESTM 

ses:  — 
id  cleri 
station 
icense, 
lilage, 

3  ■ 
8  . 

Overhead  In 
Overhead  expeni 
Administration  an 
Light,  telephone,  i 
Insurance,  taxes,  1 
Shrinkage  and  spo 
Bad  accounts. 
Interest, 

"a 

IS 

IB 

s 

u 

<     H     H         11 

18         MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    173. 


PE.R.CnNTAQL5  Of  TOTAL  Co5T5    PER.  QuAUT 

BY  ^iZE  OP  Total  5u>3ine55 


m 


501- 

tooo 


176 


1001- 
^000 


A 


7.6 


/. 


Over 
aooo 


18.9 


;^6.9: 


147 


Del  (very 


Processing 


Overhead  CZH 


COST     OF    DISTRIBUTING    MILK. 


19 


Actual  Total  Lxpense  of  Milk 

DI5TR.15UTION  PER  QUAUT 


O0Z5 


fOOI- 
^000 


501- 
iOOO 


.0OZ9 


0032 


0\/er 
1000 


004-7 


roi: 


An. 

Retgi 


j00^3 


;>oo^ 


roi6 


IMi         \Mi'        i.saf         Z.H-S^       2.95^ 
Delivery  ■§     Processing    ^^      Overhead     [^D 


20 


MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    173. 


Table  VII.  —  Percentages  of  Total  Cost  per  Quart  of  Wholesale  and  Retail 
Milk  (80  Plants),  by  Size  or  Character  of  Business. 


I 
Under 

500 
Quarts. 

II 

500- 

1,000 

Quarts. 

III 

1,001- 

2,000 

Quarts. 

IV 

Over 

2,000 

Quarts. 

V 

All 
Retail. 

Average. 

Number  of  establishments, 

27 

20 

10 

3 

20 

- 

Total  cost 

SO  0204 

SO  0164 

SO  0182 

SO  0249 

SO  0293 

SO  0218 

Per  cent., 

100 

100 

100 

100 

100 

100 

Processing  expense. 

SO  0065 

SO  0046 

SO  0045 

SO  0067 

SO  0090 

SO  0064 

Per  cent., 

31.8 

28.1 

24.7 

26.9 

30.7 

29. » 

Delivery  expense, 

SO  0114 

SO  0089 

SO  0105 

SO  0135 

SO  0160 

SO  01214 

Per  cent.. 

55.9 

54.2 

57.7 

54.2 

54.6 

55.7 

Overhead  expense. 

SO  0025 

SO  0029 

SO  0032 

SO  0047 

SO  0043 

$0  00322 

Per  cent., 

12.3 

17.6 

17.6 

18.9 

14.7 

15.0 

Investment:  — 

Per  plant 

S566 

S3,325 

$5,279 

$20,594 

82,277 

- 

Per  1,000  quarts  milk  sold,      . 

4  30 

12  84 

9  51 

19  30 

22  61 

- 

Percentage  Analysis  of  Costs. 

The  cost  analj'sis  presented  in  Table  VIII  shows  the  importance  of  labor 
both  in  processing  and  delivery,  although  the  percentual  importance  varies 
greatly  with  the  size  of  the  business.  The  labor  item  differs  also  in  the 
major  processes  of  distribution.  The  relative  importance  of  the  labor  item 
in  the  fourth  group  is  the  striking  feature  —  70  per  cent,  of  the  processing 
expense  as  contrasted  with  a  maximum  of  59  per  cent,  and  a  minimum  of 
46§  per  cent,  in  the  other  groups.  The  labor  factor  in  delivery  costs  is 
more  uniform  but  even  here  the  labor  item  in  the  fourth  group  reaches 
the  maximum  —  61.9  per  cent. 

It  is  significant  that  the  labor  item  in  preparation  is  lowest  in  the  third 
and  the  all-retail  groups,  although  the  third  group  shows  an  actual  proc- 
essing cost  of  .45  cents,  and  the  all-retail  a  co.st  of  .90  cents  per  quart. 

The  principal  point  of  emphasis  in  the  overhead  analj^sis,  aside  from 
the  notable  variation  in  the  importance  of  the  various  items,  is  the  high 
percentage  of  shrinkage  and  spoilage  in  the  "over  2,000"  group.  Bad 
accounts  average  more  than  one-eighth  of  the  overhead  and,  curiously 
enough,  are  percentually  highest  in  Groups  I  and  II,  wliich  show  the 
lowest  actual  overhead.  The  interest  item,  of  course,  varies  with  the 
investment.  Its  percentual  importance  averages  from  about  9  per  cent, 
in  Group  I,  to  26.3  per  cent,  (three  times  as  much)  in  the  all-retail  group. 


COST   OF   DISTRIBUTING   MILK. 


21 


Table  VIIL  —  Percentages  of  Costs  in   Relation   to   Size   of  Business. 
Amounts  handled  and  Items  of  Expenses  classified  in  Groups. 


Percentages  accordinq  to  Size  or  Kind  of 
Business. 

I 

II 

ni 

IV 

V 

Number  of  quarts  sold  daily,     . 

Under 
500. 

500-1,000. 

1,001-2,000. 

Over 

2,000. 

All  Retail. 

Number  of  establishments. 

27 

20 

10 

3 

20 

Average  per  cent,  quarts  sold  daily:  — 

Wholesale, 

Retail 

28.4 
71.6 

26.1 
73.9 

23.6 
76.4 

17.6 

82.4 

100.0 

Preparation  expenses  in  per  cent,  of 
total. 

31.8 

28.1 

24.7 

26.9 

30.7 

Depreciation  and  maintenance, 

Supplies, 

Labor, 

8.1 
33.0 
58.9 

8.6 
34.7 
56.6 

14  3 

39.1 
46.6 

15.6 
14.2 
70.2 

18.9 
34.6 
46.5 

Delivery  expenses  in  per  cent,  of  total. 

55.9 

54.2 

57.7 

54.2 

54.6 

Depreciation  and  maintenance. 

Supplies, 

Labor, 

14.8 
25.7 
59.5 

17.8 
28.1 
54.1 

12.5 
26.1 
61.4 

12.8 
25.3 
61.9 

19.3 
24.1 
56.6 

Overhead  expenses  in  per  cent,  of  total, 

12.3 

17.6 

17.6 

18.9 

14.7 

Administrative  and  clerical  salaries, 
Light,  telephone,  stationery,    . 
Insurance,  taxes,  license, 
Shrinkage  and  spoilage,    . 

Bad  accounts 

Interest,    

49.8 
13.8 
4.6 
7.0 
16.1 
8.7 

43.0 
6.4 
5.1 
8.1 
15.5 
21.9 

48.2 
6.0 

12.0 
5.8 

13.0 

15.0 

28.6 
6.5 
12.5 
19.7 
12.3 
20.4 

37.8 
9.2 
6.6 
8.8 
11.3 
26.3 

Expenses  in  per  cent,  of  receipts:  — 

Preparation  or  processing, 

Delivery 

Overhead 

Total  expenses  in  per  cent,  of  receipts, 

7.9 
13.9 

2.9 
24.7 

5.8 
11.1 

3.4 
20.3 

5.0 
11.6 

3.3 
19.9 

8.4 
17.0 

5.7 
31.1 

9.4 
16.7 

4.3 
30.4 

22         MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    173. 

The  relation  of  costs  to  receipts  is  the  really  significant  fact  to  the 
distributor.  Costs  run  from  a  minimum  of  19.9  per  cent,  to  a  maximum 
of  31.1  per  cent,  of  total  receipts.  This  means  that  the  costs  of  the  all- 
retail  and  "over  2,000"  groups,  for  example,  absorb  30  to  31  per  cent, 
of  the  total  receipts,  a  portion  more  than  50  per  cent,  greater  than  the 
part  taken  by  the  second  and  third  groups. 

This  percentage  which  the  expenses  bear  to  receipts  may  be  called  the 
operating  ratio.  It  is  lowest  in  Groups  II  and  III  and  highest  in  Group 
IV.  The  lower  the  ratio  the  more  economical  the  operation  of  the  plant. 
The  operating  ratio  in  any  business  is  very  significant.  In  milk  distri- 
bution 20  per  cent,  is  probably  a  low  ratio  and  30  per  cent,  a  high  ratio, 
but  much  more  accounting  must  be  done  to  determine  this.  In  all  in- 
stances the  more  expensive  distribution  is  due  both  to  higher  processing 
and  higher  delivery  costs  and,  in  the  fourth  and  all-retail  groups  also 
to  higher  overhead  expenses. 

Comparative  Costs  by  Localities. 

Table  IX  presents  comparative  cost  data  by  towns.  In  these  figures 
no  attempt  has  been  made  to  separate  costs  into  processing  and  delivery. 
All  the  firms  operating  in  Amherst  and  Walpole  are  in  the  "500  quarts  or 
under"  class;  all  bat  three  of  the  Haverhill  and  Pittsfield  firms  are  dis- 
tributing less  than  1,000  quarts  per  day;  hence  the  firms  interviewed 
doing  a  daily  business  of  1,000  quarts  and  more  are  almost  all  in  Spring- 
field and  Worcester. 

The  data  show  plainly  the  greater  cost  per  quart  in  the  two  larger  cities, 
a  cost  which  is  seen  in  practically  all  items  entering  into  distribution. 
Few  conclusions  of  significance  as  regards  variations  by  localities  can  be 
drawn  from  the  figures  giving  total  locality  costs. 


COST   OF   DISTRIBUTING    MILK. 


23 


O 

ts 
s 
e 


0» 


O 


X 


n 
< 


CO 

o 

-i* 

o 

OO 

t~ 

■^ 

C<1 

c^ 

t— 

05 

"ri 

^H 

o 

!0 

.^ 

en 

oo 

-Cj 

O 

"3 

o 

CO 

o 

so 

M> 

CO 

U5 

o» 

* 

CO 

o 

M. 

00 

CM 

CO 

CO 

o 

s 

CO 

C-J 

o 

I^ 

05 

00 

■* 

CO 

^ 

t^ 

r^ 

z 

0. 

C<l 

■^ 

t-^ 

lO 

CS 

0 

'3 

in 

< 

5 

a 

« 

CO 

o 

lo 

o 

o 

o 

p. 

bfl 

CO 

o 

=o 

C^l 

a 

■^ 

CO 

o 

o 

•^ 

■^ 

^ 

C>l 

o 

o 

?4 

M 

s 

CO 

l« 

<M_ 

^ 

3 

^^ 

m 

CD 

J^ 

o 

C2 

O 

* 

o 

so 

b* 

o 

i 

■«** 

,_, 

Ira 

f>. 

in 

to 

O 

us 

CO 

-* 

o 

CO 

o 

■^ 

£3 

s 

o 

o 

00 

ia 

WD 

to 

o 

IM 

o 

to 

CO 

"rt 

c^ 

o 

CO 

o 

■<*< 

cr> 

-^ 

C5 

CO 

to 

00 

o 

00 

CO 

H 

lO 

N 

^ 

^ 

00 

^ 

«^ 

lO 

in 

^ 

o 

^ 

o 

C-, 

UO 

in 

IM 

o 

o 

0 

S 

^1 

o 

IM 

o 

M 

CO 

CO 

o 

o 

o 

00 

0 

0. 

o 

o 

CQ 

to 

IM 

■^ 

a 

c 

e@ 

*-< 

»-H 

c^ 

^^ 

W 

H 

z 

» 

o 

CD 

s 

o 

^t* 

s 

M 

o 

o 

:0 

o 

CO 

&! 

S 

o 

o 

1^ 

o 

M 

CO 

00 

12 
'3 

o 

o 

> 

im" 

t» 

"0 

00_ 

00 

Z 

«« 

?1 

CO 

n 

tj 

^ 

to 

m 

00 

o 

t^ 

0 

■^ 

CO 

•"J* 

0 

s 

3 

2; 

IB 

SI 

05 

M 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

0 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

0 

» 

1 

o 

o 

•^ 

(3, 

o 

CO 

cq 

■^ 

in 

to 

"3 

c^ 

CO 

00 

o 

CO 

> 

^ 

im" 

o 

cT 

" 

to 

2 

^ 

c 

H 

» 

0 

X 

H 

o 

2 

-3 

"o 

a> 

o 

ta 

o 

"a 

1 

o 
> 

0 

< 

^ 

w 

s 

CC 

^ 

24 


MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION    BULLETIN    173. 


&q 


CQ 


5 


O 


X 


< 


S      £ 

in 

m 

c 

M 

0 

-  I 

.a      a 

CO 

C  O  rt 

3       o 

Z    Q 

»o 

<» 

-.*< 

« 

CO 

CI 

^ 

00 

to 

0 

CO 

CO 

o 

00 

J^ 

,_, 

Ci 

Ci 

CO 

U 

CO 

0 

>o 

CO 

02 

0 

■^ 

°i 

0 

"3 

il 

0 

0 

^ 

CO 

in 

IC 

0 

CO 

o 

•-H 

.-^ 

H 

C5 

e<i 

00 

^ 

CO 

■>r 

0 

0 

0 

0 

-^ 

t^ 

t^ 

CO 

_, 

CJ 

00 

"a 

01 

0 

« 

00 

l« 

Ci 

CO 

o 

»o 

ta 

10 

00 

c^" 

^ 

H 

e<& 

CO 

CO 

«n 

00 

t^ 

03 

^ 

^ 

0 

»o 

0 

M< 

1 

c! 

0 

QO 

C 

CO 

-^ 

■0 

<o 

S 

t'^ 

o 

t-^ 

c^" 

o» 

CO 

(S 

« 

o 

n 

■< 

I-) 

0 

00 

0 

CO 

CO 

C) 

,_, 

C3 

CO 

m 

£ 

0 

CO 

^ 

>n 

o 

cT 

CO 

HH 

>*^ 

M 

•n 

^ 

ira 

0 

0 

t^ 

•^ 

u^ 

Ci 

•B 

y^ 

00 

CO 

-    _ 

00 

00 

0-. 

0 

£ 

■^ 

CO 

CO 

M" 

s 

ro 

»o 

ko" 

c; 

CO 

•«< 

iC 

a    ■ 

'is 

00 

j^ 

■.J* 

e<i 

»o 

00 

Tj< 

CO 

(M 

CO    ■ 

0 

0 

CO 

OJ 

■* 

^^ 

J,, 

,_, 

CD 

CO 

■^ 

cc 

00 

0 

eo_ 

in 

t-T 

ci" 

•^ 

Q^ 

CO 

Os" 

«^ 

C^ 

.5:0 

O 

d 

(M 

c<» 

■^ 

IC 

oc 

CO 

g 

s 

00 

■^ 

s 

,^ 

,^ 

CO 

■'J' 

CO 

co 

■<*< 

C5 

CO 

s 

10 

t^ 

CO 

CO 

^ 

c^ 

•o" 

0" 

OS 

10* 

e 

€(* 

CO 

■3 

S 

!Z 

^ 

0 

H 

« 

0 

|H 

• 

E" 

M 

0 

3" 

"« 

0 

0 

Ic 

u 

"3 

en 
B 

a 
cc 

< 

a 

> 

k. 

s 

1  ■ 

COST    OF    DISTRIBUTING    MILK. 


25 


C=5 


o 
H 


5 


(5) 

10 

tn 

05 

CO 

CO 

^ 

"as 

CO 

0 

0 

0 

e^i 

IM 

" 

" 

'" 

ij 

m  aj 

01 

00 

■>«< 

CO 

o> 

0 

1 

< 

sS 

t^ 

CO 

00 

H 

c^ 

M 

(M 

CO 

CM 

H 

3  I, 

rt 

ca 

6 

0 

CO 

CO 

eo 

CM 

CO 

0 
0 

1 

t- 

^ 

t^ 

■^ 

00 

t- 

0. 

qq 

S--^ 

M 

to 

0 

„ 

CO 

■*■ 

CO 

&  1-  tn 

0 

Ol 

0 

m 

Q 

(M 

(M 

CM 

CM 

CO 

CM 

CM 

0  S! 

|a| 

0 

|S 

ag 

^ 

m 

00 

05 

t- 

CO 

CO 

CO 

0 

ro 

0 

eo 

0 

0 

PS 

0 

«o 

CO 

01 

Oi 

f^ 

CM 

f^ 

0 

0 

-^ 

c^ 

CO 

t^ 

CO 

>o 

CO 

'oS 

t^ 

0 

■^ 

CO 

CO 

CM 

00" 

«» 

CO 

TJ* 

0 

10 

0) 

CO 

>^ 

tf 

s* 

0 

0 

tn 

Oi 

•n 

o> 

00 

•* 

CO 

eo 

^B 

Cl 

'— • 

>o 

«o 

00 

o" 

« 

cf 

t>r 

CO 

00" 

CO 

C-1 

eo 

02 

0 

CO 

d 

H 

55 

0 

Q 

0 

0 

m 

in 

P 

ij 

0 

0 

in 

c» 

■<    . 

s^"^ 

0 

c^ 

0 

eo 

c^ 

•0 

iV 

en 

10 

cT 

t>r 

CO 

^ 

s 

00 

Cl 

CO 

CM 

2 
0 

1  = 

^ 

t^ 

eo 

«5 

CO 

a 

0 

•0 

0 

•o 

0 

in 

in 

u 

la 

00 

00 

t^ 

^ 

00 

^3 

■* 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CM 

0 

a 

|1 

CO 

0 

^ 

0 

CO 

0 

CO 

■^ 

t^ 

00 

CO 

•* 

0 

s 

t^ 

Ui 

>Hg 

n 

ca 

CO 

«o 

S 

^ 

S 

S 

>J 

< 

0 

0 

0 

t~ 

t- 

0 

•«»< 

>,5 

0 

ci 

c^ 

00' 

oi 

ci 

^ 

IS 

0 

00 

eo 

0 

0 

o_ 

3 

>n 

°2 

^ 

^ 

00 

to 

00 

in* 

0 

" 

■^ 

z 

^ 

0 

Eh 

«: 

0 

t- 

H 

i-t 

0 

2 

0 

0 

ffi 

0 
"o 

1 

"3 

CC 
M 
C 

0. 

1 

0. 

i 

< 

^ 

K 

c 

^ 

26 


MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION    BULLETIN    173. 


Q 

H 


6q 


O 


2    O 


s 
c 


o 


g 
•^ 


X 


e3 


."3  d 

^ 

^ 

CO 

0 

c<> 

e^ 

.sfej-s 

ci 

t- 

^ 

0 

r* 

05 

s^^^s 

u 

s    s 

0 

r^ 

10 

CO 

CO 

CO 

•S^-2 

CO 

CO 

CO 

cog 

3      ? 

Z    Pi 

s? 

■3 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1  s 

10 

*o 

10 

•0 

c 

0  K 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

a 

°l 

g 

»  ^ 

^■^ 

_il5 

Ifl 

10 

in 

H 

"fl* 

■^ 

0 

=SJ 

' 

1 

g 

0 

0 

0 

0 

GO 

0 

00 

00 

0 

00 

"i 

0 

0 

= 

0 

0 

0 

ii 

0 

S 

i^ 

3§ 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

ira 

cq 

t^ 

CO 

s 

» 

j:  ca 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

72 

^- 

0 

0 

CO 

(^ 

<N 

r* 

•0 

0  — • 

^ 

CO 

to 

t^ 

M4 

CO 

Q 

^i 

'^ 

IM 

CO 

N 

U) 

> 

« 

H 

a 

0  . 

t^ 

*!** 

00 

0 

CO 

CO 

CO 

Ci 

0 

CO 

■^ 

Ch 

J3  03 

^- 

0 
H 

■ 

to 

t) 

0 

t^ 

■^ 

0 

0 

■J 

10 

10 

s_ 

CO 

t^ 

00 

0 

0 

^s» 

r^ 

c^" 

« 

^^ 

e>    . 

«o 

•^ 

•* 

0 

CO 

■^ 

a_u 

CO 

^ 

0 

t>. 

0 

gs 

U 

Q 

3   tM 

0 

00 

0 

PJ 

u 
J 

■^f 

CO 

>o 

•^ 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

> 
< 

|2 

» 

H 

:0 

>1 

u:> 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

H 

00 

■<}< 

iri 

^ 

f^ 

u^ 

-1 

'3 

10 

0 

in 

e<i 

S 

Q 

CO 

e^ 

0 

z 

^ 

0 

H 

« 

i- 

H 

i-t 

u 

2" 

2 

5 

0 

"3 

Id 

1 

U3 

'C 
0. 

J3 

c 

g 

"3 

cS 

0 

< 

^ 

>c 

^ 

COST   OF   DISTRIBUTING    MILK.  27 

The  comparative  analysis  of  costs,  including  both  processing  and 
delivery,  of  retailing  milk  by  cities  and  towois  is  exhibited  in  Table  X. 
Before  comparing  localities  it  may  be  well  to  note  that  by  far  the  most 
important  item  is  labor,  which  varies  from  one-half  to  more  than  two- 
thirds  of  the  whole  distributing  cost.  This  includes  only  man  labor, 
horse  labor  being  carried  in  the  other  items.  This  expense  is  greatest  in 
Springfield,  where  it  amounts  to  nearly  2  cents  a  quart,  and  lowest  in 
Haverhill,  where  it  is  scarcely  more  than  1  cent. 

Depreciation  is  the  smallest  charge,  and  runs  about  6  per  cent,  of  the 
total;  actually  it  is  lowest  in  Haverhill  and  highest  in  Springfield. 

Maintenance  and  circulating  capital  show  great  relative  variation. 
Both  are  relatively  and  actually  lowest  in  Amherst  and  actually  highest 
in  Worcester  and  Springfield.  The  two  charges  amount  to  .52  cents  a 
quart  in  Amherst,  .85  in  Walpole,  .88  in  Pittsfield,  .92  in  Haverhill,  1.03 
cents  in  Worcester  and  1.04  cents  in  Springfield.  In  general  these  items 
increase  with  the  size  of  the  town. 

Amherst  v.  Walpole. 

Amherst  seems  to  process  and  distribute  its  supply  of  milk  more  eco- 
nomically than  Walpole,  notwithstanding  the  labor  bill  is  slightly  higher. 
Omitting  cream,  our  figures  show  in  round  numbers  500,000  quarts  of 
wholesale  and  retail  milk  delivered  yearly  in  Walpole  and  471,000  in 
Amherst.  On  this  basis,  Walpole's  labor  costs  111.65  per  1,000  quarts, 
and  Amherst's  $11.87;  for  retailed  milk  the  labor  expense  is  .$12.58  per  1,000 
quarts  in  Walpole  and  .S13.69  in  Amherst.  Hired  help  is  a  little  cheaper 
and  more  plentiful  in  the  eastern  part  of  the  State,  though  the  personal 
labor  in  both  towns  was  computed  at  25  cents  per  hour.  The  time  occu- 
pied in  delivery  is  the  same,  though  the  average  milk  route  in  Walpole 
is  25  per  cent,  shorter.  Walpole  serves  more  customers  per  wagon,  180 
to  143  for  Amherst,  but  delivers  less  milk  per  customer. 

The  dealers  in  Amherst,  however,  expend  less  for  maintenance  and 
working  capital.  The  lower  maintenance  is  due  in  part  to  the  greater  load 
per  horse,  the  average  retail  load  per  horse  being  175  quarts,  in  contrast 
with  143  quarts  in  Walpole.  It  must  be  noted,  however,  that  Walpole 
hauls  more  per  wagon  —  including  wholesale  milk  and  cream,  234  quarts 
to  214  for  Amherst;  the  explanation  is  a  two-horse  wagon.  In  working 
capital  there  is  a  margin  of  .19  cents  per  quart  (43  per  cent,  less)  in  favor 
of  Amherst.  Table  X  shows  that  these  two  items  amount  to  nearly  40 
per  cent,  of  the  total  in  Walpole  as  compared  with  less  than  26  per  cent, 
in  Amherst. 

With  the  exception  of  the  items  stationery  and  shrinkage,  the  Amherst 
figures  for  circulating  capital  show  a  big  saving.  The  greater  stationery 
charge  is  accounted  for  by  the  use  of  tickets  by  several  of  the  Amherst 
dealers.  The  wisdom  of  this  expenditure  is  justified  by  the  small  loss  in 
bottles  and  a  minimum  loss  by  bad  debts.  It  cost  the  five  Walpole  dealers 
$340  a  year  for  bottles,  or  72  cents  per  1,000  quarts  of  retail  milk  delivered. 


28 


MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    173. 


■13 


C5 


1^ 


?i. 


O 


o 


,=C5. 


C3 


Q 


n 
< 


b< 

lo 

^^ 

o 

>o 

^ 

i  — 

»^ 

o 

ct^ 

w 

_^   C3 

o 

o 

C-l 

H 

03 

a^ 

o 

o 

° 

o 

o 

o 
«® 

1^ 

o 

f. 

^ 

o 

t^ 

o 

o 

^ 

S  c 

U5 

t-* 

lO 

e<i 

us 

" 

fc-    . 

o 

^j* 

oo 

C<l 

o 

G^  uJ 

<o 

>o 

00 

at: 

s 

00 

s 

O 

o 

CO 

"m  3 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

S 

OQ- 

o 

o 

fa 
o 

o 

e® 

e% 

g 

o 

o 

CO 

c^ 

o 

Cs 

u 

cu 

V  c 

«o 

oo 

«n 

o 

o 

03 

^a 

CO 

o 

^ 

o 

m 

IM 

J^ 

^ 

2  -J 

CO 

CO 

o 

0.x. 

n 

CO 

o 

O 

(M 

Q 

o 

O 

o 

o 

o 

^ 
H 

ii 

o 

s 

fa 

o 

in 

en 

o 

g 

£ 

00 
U5 

o 
o 

t>- 

c^ 

o 
o 

>o 

o 

t. 

OS 

t^ 

00 

o 

o 

S-w 

CO 

00 

a  b. 

** 

o 

00  3 

o 

o 

.J 

o 

o 

o 

3 

o 

r9a 

o 

o 

E 

> 

o 

»» 

C* 

o 

w 

o 

oo 

Q 

t^ 

CD 

M 

< 

K 

S  B 

to 

ci 

o 

O 

o 

(M 

<M 

U5 

o 

Ui 

oo 

r^ 

OO 

00 

o 

2  *; 

>o 

CO 

atl 

o 

s 

s 

m  3 

o 

o 

o 

O 

o 

r^a 

o 

o 

o 

O 

e» 

a» 

^ 

lO 

r>- 

^^ 

o 

*o 

^ 

Ci 

O 

o 

^ 

S  C 

o 

oo 

o 

■^ 

o 

lO 

o 

t. 

CO 

00 

t^ 

05 

^ 

9.-^ 

« 

■* 

a  b 

(M 

CO 

o 

O 

g 

"m    3 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

.^5 

o 

o 

« 

o 

«® 

99 

Ui 

a 

00 

o 

oo 

oo 

Q 

s 

o 

< 

O   3 

o 

M 

(M 

f. 

1 

^c3 

o 

"« 

■M 

0. 

c 

« 

OS 

.2 

g 

bfi 

.1 

.S 

1 

■.J 
3 

"3 

g 

c. 

Q 

'5 

COST   OF   DISTRIBUTING    MILK. 


29 


Five  Amherst  dealers  expend  $140.69  for  bottles,  or  37  cents  per  1,000 
quarts  of  retail  milk;  this  includes  one  dealer  who  does  not  use  tickets. 
EHminating  this  dealer  for  the  sake  of  accurate  comparison,  the  results 
may  be  presented  in  tabular  form,  as  follows:  — 


Number. 

Dis- 
tribute 

1,000 
Quarts. 

Expend  fob 
Bottles. 

Bad  Debts. 

Dealers  in  — 

Total. 

Per  1,000 
Quarts. 

Total. 

Per  1,000 
Quarts. 

Walpole, 

Amherst  using  tickets, 

5 

4 

470.5 
346.7 

$340  00 
133  40 

SO  72 
38 

S182 
31 

$0  40 
09 

It  is  significant  that  of  $82  reported  as  lost  through  bad  debts  by  Amherst 
distributors,  $51  were  reported  by  one  dealer  who  did  not  use  the  ticket 
system.  Comparing  the  figures  of  Amherst  and  Walpole  dealers  who  do 
and  who  do  not  use  tickets,  it  appears  that  where  five  Walpole  dealers 
using  no  tickets  suffer  by  bad  debts  a  loss  of  40  cents  per  1,000  quarts 
of  milk  sold  at  retail,  and  one  Amherst  dealer  loses  similarly  62  cents, 
the  four  Amherst  distributors  using  tickets  have  but  9  cents  of  bad  debts 
for  each  1,000  quarts  retailed. 

Under  the  ticket  sj^stem  the  cost  of  collection  is  somewhat  less,  but  since 
the  drivers  do  the  collecting  it  is  difficult  to  approximate  this  difference. 
Tickets,  of  course,  mean  cash  in  advance;  just  how  long  in  advance 
depends  on  the  price  of  milk,  and  the  amount  used  per  family,  since  tickets 
are  usually  sold  in  $1  strips.  The  price  per  quart  is  exactly  the  same, 
whether  the  customer  buys  tickets  in  advance  or  pays  in  currency  when 
the  milk  is  delivered. 

Ice  cost  Walpole  dealers  $1  per  1,000  quarts  ($0,001  per  quart)  of  milk, 
and  the  Amherst  dealers  80  cents  per  1,000  quarts  ($0.0008  per  quart). 


Haverhill  v.  PittsfielcL 

The  difference  in  the  figures  for  these  towns  is  not  marked.  Pittsfield 
expends  a  very  little  less  per  quart  for  maintenance  and  circulating  capital, 
but  this  is  more  than  offset  by  higher  labor  costs.  Labor  is  comparatively 
expensive,  due  to  the  competition  of  the  summer  homes  in  the  vicinity. 

Although  Haverhill  distributed  milk  at  a  lower  cost  per  quart  than  any 
of  the  four  cities,  it  was  not  at  the  expense  of  service,  but  rather  as  the 
result  of  the  low  labor  cost  coupled  with  the  number  of  quarts  delivered 
per  horse,  in  other  words,  by  getting  the  best  service  out  of  the  horse. 
Haverhill  averages  176.3  retail  quarts  per  day  per  horse,  while  Pittsfield 
averages  but  141.2  quarts  per  horse.  Moreover,  Pittsfield  distributors 
dehver  more  cream  and  wholesale  milk  per  route  to  a  smaller  number  of 
customers  than  do  Haverhill  milkmen  —  about  100  quarts  as  against 
75  for  Haverhill. 


30         MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    173. 

It  may  be  said  in  passing  that  the  milk  supplied  by  Haverhill  dealers 
is  exceptionally  pure  and  clean.  These  qualities  are  popularly  supposed 
to  be  expensive.  If  they  are,  Haverhill  dealers  have  met  the  increased  cost 
by  economies  elsewhere.  The  city's  entire  supply  comes  from  local  pro- 
ducers. Thus  any  impure  milk  can  be  at  once  traced  to  the  source  of 
supply  and  the  producer  of  exceptionally  clean  milk  be  quickly  recognized. 
Frequent  inspections  and  monthly  tests  by  a  competent  bacteriologist  are 
made.  The  methods  of  inspection  and  the  publication  of  the  results  of 
the  monthly  bacterial  analyses  have  educated  the  Haverhill  public  to 
appreciate  the  value  of  clean  milk  and  have  stimulated  a  healthy  rivalry 
among  the  producers  and  distributors.  Only  one  dealer  uses  a  pasteurizer 
and  he  is  the  only  distributor  who  purchases  milk  outside  an  8-mile  radius. 

Springfield  v.  Worcester. 

It  costs  the  Springfield  dealers  studied  16  per  cent,  more  than  Worcester 
dealers  to  distribute  retail  milk;  and  25  per  cent,  more  than  the  average 
of  all  dealers  investigated.  Except  in  the  amount  spent  for  maintenance, 
all  the  costs  of  distribution  are  lower  in  Worcester  than  in  Springfield. 
As  a  matter  of  fact,  differences  in  depreciation,  maintenance  and  overhead 
are  negligible.  The  labor  item  alone  requires  attention.  Worcester  has 
cheaper  labor  because  a  large  proportion  of  the  distributors  are  producers, 
and  farm  labor  at  $50  a  month  (cost  of  board  included)  is  much  lower  than 
labor  in  the  city.  In  addition  to  this,  a  fair  proportion  of  Worcester's 
milk  supply  is  distributed  by  foreign-born  dealers  who  value  their  services 
cheaply. 

A  short  time  ago  an  ordinance  was  passed  doing  away  with  basement 
dairies  in  Springfield.  This  has  been  productive  of  much  good,  although 
it  entails  considerable  expense.  Depreciation  has  naturally  increased  in 
this  city  but  without  a  corresponding  increase  in  maintenance. 


COST   OF    DISTRIBUTING    MILK. 


31 


-I 


O 
e 


13 


e 
I* 


I 

X 

H 

m 
< 


s 

s 

S 

s 

S 

0 

00 

tn 

?! 

o 

-* 

H 

««& 

eo 

N 

ig 

8 

o 

8 

g 

00 

c^ 

a 

^ 

en 

O 

•o 

c^ 

i>^ 

m 

Q^ 

c 

§ 

g 

o 
o 

g 

g 

_^ 

_ 

1 

«» 

i 

s 

s 

g 

g 

g 

a 

•o 

o 

o 

00 

§ 

'~' 

£S 

§ 

g 

^  S 

O 

^ 

a» 

o 

„ 

g 

o 

o 

V 

o 

o 

CS 

[I4 

a» 

s 

s 

o 

§ 

8 

_« 

g 

s 

K 

g 

m 

a» 

o 

(3 

CC 

e» 

s» 

o 

„ 

o 

gi 

^ 

s 

s 

g 

K 

«. 

:S-a 

8 

8 

8 

8 

o 

o 

1 

s» 

o 

g 

-r 

O 

o 

3 

o 

Q 

^ 

<c 

> 

o 

Ik 

eo 

CO 

n 

^^ 

o 

e 

3 

iz: 

K 

H 

n 

S 

D 

12; 

."5 

« 

_ 

5 

O 

■     H 

CM 

00 

-H            1 

'"' 

*"* 

cr 

o 

CO 

eo 

o 

o 

1^ 

6* 

e» 

8 

1 

1 

o 

o 

8 

O) 

^^ 

CO 

lO 

t^ 

»» 

«^ 

oo 

oo 

8 

DO 

eo 

t-^ 

<«^ 

»» 

8 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

m 

o 

^ 

o 

(_, 

o 

o 

' 

9» 

o 

o 

o 

g 

o 

IM 

M 

eo 

t- 

o 

«» 

§ 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

■k.i 

o 

•^ 

•o 

o 

t^ 

U5 

f^ 

V 

»» 

K 

Si. 

w 

1-4 

' 

g 

' 

1 

o 

SI 

g 

g 

8 

o 
o 

o 

a» 

8 

g 

8 

o 

« 

eo 

00 

«» 

«» 

(_, 

eo 

o 

o 

^1. 

o 

■^f 

o 

" 

g 

g 

e« 

eo 

eo 

CO 

- 

o 

e3 

o 

H 

oT 

N 

•"• 

32 


MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    173. 


o 


'« 
s 
e 


-I 


fc. 


Q   < 


.5» 


CQ 


55, 


a 


C5 
n 

e5 


» 

lO 

„ 

CO 

CO 

"^ 

,_, 

lO 

e2 

00 

g 

eo 

o 

U5 

CO 

en 

CI 

« 

^^ 

S 

«^ 

o 

o 

o 

o 

ai 

o 

o 

o 

o 

oo 

o 

lO 

t^ 

O 

« 

o 

CO 

o 

o 

o 

o 

lO 

^ 

^s 

:o 

o 

fe 

• 

e^ 

o 

o 

o 

o 

CM 

C<l 

*^ 

C^J 

o 

^ 

m 

o 

S 

Wl 

t^ 

^^ 

c^ 

o 

52 

-3 

C 

3 

m 

o 

o 

m 

o 

o 

o 

.^ 

o 

" 

<^ 

K 

K 

H 

n 

» 

Z 

B 

» 

O 

& 

Q 

C 

a 

Ph 

o 

H 

o 

C^l 

oo 

CO 

o 

in 

CO 
CO 

iia 

o 

rt 

(M 

CO 

C-1 

in 

eo 

•4^ 

O 

m 

o 

Cs 

o 

»o 

eo 

« 

in 

H 

es> 

^ 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

_o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

*t- 

I-, 

^f 

o 

in 

CO 

"3 

(M 

CO 

tfy 

5 

^ 

-J2 

■h 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

^ 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

s 

o 

m 

o 

o 

in 

CO 

<M 

in 

■3 

(6 

9& 

c3 

H 

d 

S2       M 

3       rt 

1 

1 

1 

1 

'^  ^  -^ 

3  «-C 

CB       ^ 

7D      . 

o 

lO 

rvi 

r* 

■Si 

W 

CO 

■* 

2 

3 

CO 

CI 

00 

t^ 

OO 

CM 

00 

^ 

CVl 

'"' 

2       • 

o 

o 

o 

o 

O 

in 

lO 

in 

o 

3-3  1 

o 

o 

^ 

fc-  C   X 

^ 

Ci 

3  3  =s 

2     h 

!» 

i-i 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

1  >i 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

c3  O 

o 

o 

o 

o 

CO 

^ 

(M 

■<** 

^   § 

e» 

•*J 

^ 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

•^ 

00 

o 

o 

00 

^3 

^t^ 

lO 

in 

^ 

^ 

e» 

o 

J^ 

in 

o 

in 

o 

o 

CO 

to 

CO 

CI 

00 

"3) 

e& 

O) 

«@ 

3 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

• 

o 

o 

^ 

o 

o 

•^ 

in 

t^ 

"^ 

s 

CO 

o 

o 

c» 

o 

00 

o 

CO 

o 

oo 

2 

CO 

lO 

r^ 

CO 

^^ 

c? 

<M 

t-- 

^ 

«« 

O 

o 

o 

O 

o 

o 

o 

o 

O 

o 

CI 

a 

o 

in 

o 

CO 

_H 

o 

v> 

^ 

m 

o 

o 

Q 

o 

o 

o 

o 

■S 

■^ 

1 

oo 

M* 

CO 

o 

•^ 

C) 

CI 

tfy 

c« 

^• 

(d 

a 

A 

3 

z 

m 

S3 

r3 

y 

t> 

,o 

Q 

H 

C5 

cT 

<£ 

CO 

(M 

COST   OF   DISTRIBUTING    MILK. 


33 


cq  11  to 


-H      N      — 


a  o  3 


i-i    o    o    rt 
o    u    -•    3    o 


34 


MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    173. 


o 
O 


c:^ 


s 


o 


S     P3 


•£ 


Q 

I 

I— J 
X 


o 

^ 

t^ 

s 

o 

C5 

o 

^ 

« 

U 

in 

0-. 

M 

M 

s 

6 

1 

^? 

o 

o 

o 

O 

„ 

o 

CO 

o 

o 

O 

o 

' 

lO 

o 

o 

00 

CO 

d 

o 

o 

in 

o 

o 

>o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

i£ 

o 

e© 

'^ 

lO 

^ 

m 

^ 

^ 

o 

o 

o 

a 

ira 

ira 

s 

^ 

■^ 

— 

fe 

M 

^ 

o 

O 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

Q 

c 

o 

o 

o 

o 

in 

in 

o 

*— ' 

^ 

^ 

o 

^ 

g  g 

o 

1 

O 

^ 

se 

j;, 

o 

o 

o 

C3-- 

^ 

Ph 

^ 

o 

o 

^ 

o 

o 

lo 

o 

_ 

fe 

^ 

y 

o 

CO 

^. 

^ 

o 

o 

"5 

s 

1 

CO 

CO 

— 

«^ 

^ 

^ 

^ 

t. 

_o 

o 
o 

lO 

o 

04 

CO 

o 
o 

1 

CQ 

■<i^ 

'"' 

TJ* 

e^ 

o 

o 

o 

X! 

^ 

^ 

o 

S 

^ 

o 

-    m 

o 

o 

g| 

s 

i 

"jS 

o 

o 

^TJ 

r::  oj 

S^ 

5 

o 
in 

es 

o 

o 

g 

Q 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

^ 

_- 

> 

03 

Oi 

CO 

0! 

IS 

o 

^^ 

m 

, 

a 

1^ 

^ 

CO 

<M 

•* 

IC 

c5 

K 

H 

n 

a 

b 

•z 

m 

__^ 

K 

rf 

o 

< 

H 

a 

r^ 

« 

CO 

00 

1— 1 

in 

o 

c^ 

s 

CO 

Q 

o 

' 

„ 

o 

o 

o 

o 

6% 

«» 

^ 

■  n 

in 

^ 

o 

OC' 

c^ 

o 

o 

■^ 

^H 

CO 

CO 

e^ 

^ 

^t* 

o 

,^ 

C-1 

CO 

^^ 

t^ 

CS| 

o 

c: 

c^ 

" 

^ 

o 

^ 

o 

o 

o 

o 

CO 

^ 

o 

CI 

" 

^? 

o 

o 

t^ 

f^ 

«» 

;_ 

' 

f^ 

g 

o 

o 

ro 

„ 

o 

o 

t^ 

o 

o 

o 

Q 

1^ 

a% 

€» 

Q 

o 

ro 

o 

lO 

CO 

o 

c^ 

o 

«> 

o 

o 

nl 

o 

o 

00 

»n 

Oi 

CO 

r>. 

CO 

e© 

o 

a* 

o 

o 

o 

o 

in 

Q 

,_, 

' 

^ 

^ 

^ 

o 

o 

^^ 

' 

,^ 

» 

^ 

«o 

o 

o> 

o 

c^ 

in 

CO 

o 

CO 

in 

^ 

»9 

■* 

CO 

2J 

^t 

•n 

00 

O 

H 

COST   OF    DISTRIBUTING    MILK. 


35 


00 

OJ 

s 

CO 

"n 

CO 

1^ 

w 

o 

^ 

'"t 

H 

M 

e^ 

o 

o 

CO 

§ 

ty 

^ 

O 

e« 

o 

(C 

o 

CM 

o 

to 

_ 

1 

'■' 

t^ 

CO 

e@ 

o 

o 

M* 

00 

•o 

t^ 

lO 

CO 

CO 

(^ 

CO 

o 

o 

M 

o 

o 

(M 

o 

CM 

J3 

IXi 

i 

o 

CO 

o 

o 

o 

05 

C*1 

c 

3 

s 

OQ 

o 

o 

2 

o 

m 

o 

in 

i 

CO 

CM 

CM 

eo 

« 

«^ 

K 

1       >^ 

0 

s 

D 

Z 

IE 

K 

» 

iJ 

< 

IB 

Q 

•3 

eo 

-7 

'^ 

CM 

lO 

o 

_ 

CO 

00 

o 

CO 

o 

o 

t^ 

*o 

c3 

en 

lO 

CO 

Ol 

o 

1 

C3 

o 

SS. 

OJ 

«o 

o_ 

co_ 

00 

«^ 

f" 

«^ 

m 

o 

CO 

o 

o 

o 

CO 

.2 

o 

o 

CO 

CM 

u 

r^ 

IC 

^ 

■a 

CO 

eo 

eo 

^ 

c 

6^ 

3 

» 

M 

K 

o 

<3 

CM 

o 

Q 

CM 

o 

o 

o 

o 

B 

o 

00 

o 

o 

CO 

o 

m 

o 

-a 

s© 

« 

"" 

00_ 

C3 

CO 

m        1* 

>o 

o 

o 

lO 

3        » 

HI 

lO 

o 

s 

' 

' 

CO 

Q 

CT) 

^ 

eo 

s 

CO 

w     ^ 

m 

>o 

■* 

Q 

^ 

00 

00 

"cQ 

CM 

■^ 

o 

t— 

o 

O 

^H 

CO 

t^ 

o 

CO 

*«4 

CM 

CO 

CM 

en 

c 

۩ 

^ 

'"' 

e© 

o 

C       m 

O 

o 

„ 

o 

o 

^^ 

iO 

•c 

'"' 

•n 

'— ' 

C3T3   O 

lo 

•^ 

»o 

00 

lO 

Ci 

t:  c  •< 

o 

o 

00 

3  CJ,=S 

CO 

00 

g     H 

^ 

o 

o 

(_, 

>o 

Q 

>o 

>. 

o 

o 

o 

■^ 

o 

■<J^ 

rt  S 

o 

»o 

o 

ira 

o 

^ 

^1 

>o 

t^ 

o 

■^ 

CO 

6© 

^ 

«i 

"^ 

o 

lO 

o 

o 

§ 

•o 

o 

CM 

o 

o 

<^< 

O 

o 

CO 

o 

t~ 

3 

»o 

CO 

o 

o 

CO 

fe 

CO 

o 

w 

o 

o 

J3 

lO 

^ 

o 

'"' 

o 

rj* 

o 

un 

^ 

,_t 

eo 

CM 

o 

CO 

Oi 

_M 

eo 

t^ 

CM 

s© 

CM 

'^ 

«» 

e 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

>o 

o 

>ffl 

O 

5£ 

Q 

Q 

CM 

LO 

CO 

Q5 

HH 

s 

CM 

»— ' 

CM 

CO 

o 

a% 

6 

s 

g 

00 

§ 

g 

CO 

CM 

o 

CO 

m 

^^ 

W5 

CO 

Tf< 

in 

&^ 

eo 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

ta 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

c. 

CO 

CM 

CO 

o 

00 

o 

CO 

T}< 

a© 

CM 

eo 

w 

«. 

o 

o 

o 

o 

c; 

o 

o 

o 

o 

S 

CO 

o 

CO 

00 

« 

6© 

N 

i 

(S 

K 

n 

' 

S 

D 

Z 

m 

"S 

kJ 

o 

< 

Q 

(r- 

CO 

^ 

•* 

CO 

oo" 

^^ 

^^ 

CM 

CM 

CM 

36 


MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION    BULLETIN    173. 


a 
o 
O 


i 


m  00  o  t^ 

O  CO  U3  00 

"*<  U5  O  OO 

l«  -^  TO  ■* 

CO  00  OO  CO 


13 


•i  £  x> 


^  f-H  C^» 


COST   OF   DISTRIBUTING    MILK. 


37 


^S 

>> 

1 

, 

1 

1 

1 

nii 

ao>* 

o 

1 

« 

o 

f^ 

o 

H 

.c 

U 

^ 

n 

p: 

H 

o 

o 

O 

a 

o 

(M 

00 

^ 

s 

S 

J 

< 

0 

< 

>i 

o 

o 

o 

O 

o 

cr 

Q 

C 

o 

c 

s» 

^i 

a 

,_i 

^H 

lO 

3 

(M 

»^ 

^ 

'^ 

« 

h 

^ 

t* 

N 

CO 

O 

cr? 

00 

c^ 

oo 

1 

t~ 

o 

»o 

t^ 

,_, 

c^ 

,^ 

W 

, 

o 

« 

eo 

(M 

o 

Hi 

!M 

O 

G    o 

^ 

.n 

«  2 

o 
o 

CO 

« 

<■?; 

ss 

»9 

d& 

c! 

m 

o 

CO 

CO 

^^ 

C<5 

00 

a-2 

(M 

(M 

1^ 

to 

lO 

CO 

Q 

(S 

» 

n 

S 

P 

'Z 

'is 

m 

P 

cj 

Q 

0 

> 

C3 

Pu, 

o 

0 

H 

> 

IS 

0 

0 

CO 

TP 

CO 

CO 

O 

-^ 

g 

« 

s 

» 

s 

& 

p 

u 

^ 

0.6 

CO 

rvi 

en 

w 

■^ 

eo 

^ 

gs 

o 

!p 

0 

^ 

^ 

CO 

o 

o 

" 

Ed 

>    , 

-<    I 

O 

m  cu 

>o 

lO 

CO 

Pd 

c^ 

t- 

»J 

S 

Q 

t: 

0 

0 

0 

Fi 

1 

0 

o 

S 

B. 

U 

Q 
Ed 

CO 

00 

— 

CO 

0 

o> 

00 

00 

lO 

0 

K 
H 

s 

O 

m 

CO 

„ 

CO 

^ 

0 

§ 

0 

0 

p 

CO 

0 

eo 

0 

C-) 

c 

K 

s 

Oi 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

O 

0 

O 

pi: 

^ 

en 

m 

■3 

10 

0 

05 

•.^ 

tf 

" 

CO 

CM 

S 

(B 

H 

n 

s 

p 

^: 

9J 

K 

. 

Ed 
O 

P 

S 

C3 

a> 

O 

> 

K 

Ph 

1 

1 

..H 

38  MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    173. 


o 


C3 


6    "3 


^^ 

in 

K 

<! 

J 

*<>» 

r^ 

cc 

Q  d 


'« 
s 

^ 


e 

A 


1^ 


n 
< 


-2£ 

_>> 

i 

r 

1 

' 

o 

o 

§gs 

<M 

CM 

m 

0'U>^ 

^ 

1 

o 

^ 

R 

R 

s 

CO 

a 

M 

e<i 

eo 

00 

H 

CO 

t^ 

n 

^ 

0 

o 

o 

lo 

iC 

o 

m 

« 

_^ 

r^ 

O 

^ 

C-l 

< 

>. 

o 

•n 

a 

o 

<y 

a 

lO 

to 

M 

m 

CO 

O 

to 

rt 

^ 

^ 

o 

6 

Ci 

CO 

r-- 

,_ 

'^1 

C-1 

00 

J 

o 

CO 

» 

'^ 

00 

CO 

H 

_ 

o 

o 

CS 

00 

1h 

CD 

in 

t^ 

30 

30 

■^ 

OJ 

eo 

c» 

C<l 

•» 

CO 

^^ 

CO 

30 

o 

■i       - 

o 

g.Sa 

c^ 

\n 

CO 

o 

o 

o 

lO 

o 

o   u 

^> 

«. 

r^ 

30 

1      . 

CO 

CO 

'-' 

li 

cc 

f^ 

C^l 

^  3 

^ 

, 

M 

^ 

« 

.2 

o 

o 

§0 

^ 

u 

''■i 

.s* 

CO 

Q 

«. 

PS 

» 

CO 

a 

D 

z 

m 

« 

Ed 

?f 

< 

> 

Q 

C3 

0 

o 

CO* 

oo" 

M 

(M 

^ 

H 

CO 

o 

C5 

CO 

> 

3 

tn 

s 

s 

o 

00 

CO 

g 

Xi 

o 

^ 

51 

0. 

CO 

i-O 

t^ 

— , 

_ 

o 

S 

U 

i-i 

00 

CD 

^ 

0 

a 

o 

o 

o 

o 

H 

3 

S    I 

U 

^3 

o 

J 

>> 

^^ 

S 

Q 

tl 

ro 

o 

1 

n 

■* 

o 

^ 

^~* 

-H 

-- 

— 

— 

— 

-■ 

a 

3 

O 

a 

n 

o 

30 

■^ 

o 

CO 

-^ 

CO 

c^ 

c^ 

■^ 

S 

S 

o 

o 

CD 

lO 

o 

o 

^, 

CI 

CO 

s 

o 

O 

o 

o 

S 

C 

s 

s 

a 

pi 

u 

C3 

>1 

lO 

oc 

o 

t^ 

« 

z 

LO 

t^ 

" 

t^ 

s 

B 

H 

a 

s 

Z 

cs 

='« 

H 
J 

<: 

> 

Q 

00 

0 

"3 

I 

^^ 

"^ 

C-1 

M 

COST   OF   DISTRIBUTING   MILK.  39 


The  Producer  as  a  Distributor  in  Comparison  with  the  Dealer. 

Any  comparison  of  costs  that  fails  to  recognize  the  difference  between 
the  business  of  the  producer  who  distributes  his  o\\'n  milk,  or  his  own  milk 
plus  some  purchased  from  his  neighbors,  and  the  dealer  who  buys  all  the 
milk  he  distributes,  is  surely  inadequate.  The  data  in  Tables  XI  and  XII 
are  inserted  to  exhibit  this  comparison  in  some  detail.  The  records  of 
four  producers  and  five  distributors  whose  cost  accounts  were  kept  with 
unusual  care  are  chosen  for  this  comparison.  As  usual  the  figures  on  cost 
per  quart  (Table  XI)  are  based  on  milk  sold  at  retail.  From  the  total  cost 
of  doing  business  3  cents  per  quart  were  deducted  for  retail  cream  sold 
and  one-half  cent  per  quart  for  milk  delivered  at  wholesale. 

The  most  striking  reflection  in  the  whole  comparison  is  the  great  differ- 
ence in  costs  as  between  individuals  whether  producers  or  dealers.  Pro- 
ducers' retailing  costs  run  from  2.51  to  1.67  cents  per  quart,  and  dealers' 
from  2.95  cents  to  less  than  half  that  much,  or  1.45  cents  per  quart.  Such 
wide  variations  between  individuals  indicate  the  fruitlessness  of  drawing 
any  but  the  most  general  conclusions  from  the  final  averages.  It  is  evident 
that  much  remains  to  be  done  in  the  study  of  economical  and  efficient 
methods  of  distribution  and  in  profitable  investment  in  equipment  and 
buildings. 

1.  According  to  these  figures,  the  average  producer  is  able  to  distribute 
retail  milk  more  cheaply,  it  costing  him  2  cents  per  quart  against  2.16  cents 
for  the  dealer.  An  anal3^sis  of  the  figures,  however,  shows  that  the  dealer's 
investment  is  about  12  per  cent,  greater  than  the  producer's  per  1,000 
quarts  of  milk  handled.  There  is  some  difference  in  maintenance,  but  on 
the  whole  this  is  in  favor  of  the  dealer. 

2.  The  labor  bill  of  the  average  dealer  is  noticeably  greater  per  quart, 
notwithstanding  he  is  near  his  market  and  saves  in  time.  This  is  indicated 
by  the  fact  that  the  dealer  retails  42  quarts  per  mile  to  the  producer's  20 
—  more  than  double.  The  dealer  almost  always  has  the  advantage  of 
shorter  delivery  routes.  The  producer  must  often  travel  several  miles 
from  his  farm  before  he  reaches  his  first  customer  and  retrace  this  distance 
after  his  load  has  been  delivered.  In  this  instance  the  producer  averaged 
12|  miles  per  wagon;   the  dealer,  only  6  miles  per  wagon. 

3.  The  producer  has  the  advantage  in  depreciation  and  working  capital. 
In  other  words,  the  dealer  invests  more  in  his  equipment  and  buildings, 
naturally  increasing  the  depreciation  and  circulating  capital  accounts. 
The  items  of  shrinkage  and  bad  bills  are  significant.  These  two  items  are 
the  most  important  of  the  overhead  costs  of  the  dealers  here  noted.  As 
a  whole  the  overhead  charges  and  current  supplies,  i.e.,  the  circulating 
capital,  of  the  dealers  per  1,000  quarts  handled  are  more  than  60  per  cent, 
higher  than  those  of  th'e  producers. 

4.  The  dealer  gives  better  service  in  pasteurizing  and  clarifying  and  his 
labor  account  is  also  somewhat  reduced  by  use  of  better  labor-saving  devices 
for  washing,  fiUing,  etc. 


40 


MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    173. 


O 


o 


•S 

w 

■^ 

q 

-7^ 

I' 

o 

CO 

*<:-i 
« 

g 

s 

Ct 

•^ 

« 

>  c 


1    § 


8 


cc 


O 


y. 


< 


•A 

$10,790 
4,222 
6,078 

5,989 
5,833 

13 
o 

Eh 

C^           CO           CO                          «           -H 

S     t2     g           S:     5 

^-      CD      «               *      " 

K 

C 

m 
< 

III 

M  O  C-.  t^  O 
Ci        oo        t^                     t~         — 

CM  ec  o  =^  ■* 
CO      N      po               m      n 

1; 

CO       CO       t^                  f^       cc 

O  C-l  O  TO  -W 
t-        OO         0_                     lO        CO 

ct"    m    c-r         cj 

H 
o 

< 

H 

g 

III 

s« 

"3 

•ff  OO  •.J'  -NO 
O         t^        »0                     -N         CO 

«»        «         <N 

0 

y 

go 
o 

S      o      f2               K      S 

cc  CO  -^  t-  00 
09                     '^ 

"3 

C7J  CC  O  CO  CO 
O  t^  05  CO  o 
00         CI         l-C                     O         CM 

o 

5 

a 

a 

Q 

2  s  g       g  ss 

CO        CM        lO                   CO        -w 

"d 
^ 

cc    c^    o          «a    fc 

CO       c/^       ^                o       o 

C^         cc        0C_                     CM         .-. 

H 
S 

> 

ill 

o      eo      i^              S      Er 

■.I*         ■.»•         Cl                     CO        CO 

co_  U5  CO  CM_  eo_ 
irj"     CO      CO               o      cc 

1 

O         Ci         O                     to        t^ 

CM      to      ■»<               —      ec 

■^        CO        t^                   CO        oo 

o"      in      c-r               ec 

pm5 

5^ 

g    S    S          S    5 

O)      «      e^               CM      — 

in  O  CO  ^  o 
Ci         ^         CO                     CO         CO 

o       o       o                o       t^ 

cc        O         CM                     <2         S 

•a.      CO      —              CO      CM 

-T     cc 

■    ■    ■    1 

i  :  .  ;l  :  ; 

r2      CO      ^<      Tf      ^      c^      c*5 

g     2     S     S      o     «     CM 
Q      6      d      6     Pi      d      6 

;z:    2:    P5         z    ^: 

COST   OF   DISTRIBUTING    MILK.  41 

One  must  bear  in  mind,  however,  that  the  expenses  of  collecting  the 
milk  are  not  charged  to  the  dealer.  The  above  figures  are  calculated 
from  the  time  the  milk  arrives  at  the  dairy  or  distributing  plant  until  it 
reaches  the  consumer,  the  cost  of  transportation  from  the  producer  to 
the  dealer's  plant,  including  freight  and  haulage  from  producer  to  shipping 
point  and  from  shipping  destination  to  milk  plant,  not  being  included, 
whereas  the  producer's  costs  include  haulage  to  the  city.  To  this  degree 
the  figures  are  not  comparable.  The  dealer  sometimes  collects  from  the 
producer,  sometimes  pays  a  higher  price  for  milk  delivered  at  his  plant, 
sometimes  paj^s  freight  charges.  Usually  the  difference  between  milk  col- 
lected by  the  dealer  and  milk  delivered  to  the  dealer  is  about  one-half 
cent  per  quart. 

When  milk  is  shipped  from  a  distance  it  is  usually  laid  down  at  the 
dealer's  plant  for  a  price  equal  to  or  less  than  the  local  producing  dis- 
tributor can  produce  it.  In  such  case  the  dealer  and  the  producer  who 
sells  his  o^Ti  milk  may  both  start  from  their  doors  with  loads  of  milk  equal 
in  value.  When  the  dealer  procures  local  milk  he  usually  pays  one-half 
cent  per  quart  more  for  it  if  brought  to  his  dairy. 

Further  analysis,  both  from  a  collective  and  an  individual  standpoint, 
indicates  that  the  variation  in  the  cost  of  distribution  is  related  closely  to 
the  number  of  quarts  delivered  per  horse  in  conjunction  with  the  quarts 
delivered  per  mile.  One  dealer  (No.  14)  with  three  horses  delivers  1,600 
quarts  daily  (including  500  quarts  of  wholesale  milk  in  cans).  Although 
his  mileage  per  horse  (8  miles)  is  higher  than  most  of  the  dealers,  his  ex- 
ceptionally heavy  delivery,  45.8  quarts  per  mile,  helps  to  bring  his  retail 
cost  down  to  1.45  cents  per  quart.  Of  the  producers,  No.  23  delivers  at 
less  cost  than  others  in  the  group,  although  his  mileage  is  15  per  horse; 
this  is  accounted  for  by  the  large  load  hauled  —  230  retail  quarts  per 
horse  —  and  his  comparatively  small  overhead  charges.  Producer  No.  9 
carries  520  quarts  on  two  wagons.  His  horse  load  is  good  and  his  delivery 
per  mile  (29.3  quarts),  retail  and  wholesale,  is  larger  than  any  other  pro- 
ducer in  the  group  —  in  fact,  nearly  50  per  cent,  above  the  average. 

Table  XII  will  repay  careful  study.  The  analysis  of  cost  per  1,000 
quarts  of  milk  delivered  daily  is  excellent  for  comparative  study  and 
reveals  very  striking  individual  variations.  No.  13,  who  uses  four  horses 
and  travels  IS  miles,  with  an  average  load  of  107  quarts  per  horse  to 
deliver  430  quarts  daily,  has  high  cost  items  in  all  respects.  His  labor 
and  working  capital  accounts  are  nearly  thrice  those  of  No.  14  and  his 
other  items  twice  as  great.  Dealer  No.  24  makes  up  for  his  high  invest- 
ment and  large  depreciation  and  overhead  costs  by  a  low  maintenance 
expense  and  a  small  labor  bill.  His  labor  charge  is  only  one-half  that  of 
No.  13,  and  S700  less  per  1,000  quarts  than  that  of  the  average  producer. 

The  efficiency  of  No.  14  has  been  noted  above.  His  economies  extend 
to  every  division  of  his  business.  His  labor  bill  is  extremely  small  and 
except  for  horse  feed  his  maintenance  costs  are  very  low. 


42 


MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION    BULLETIN    173. 


CO       <u 

^    CO 

O         !- 

O    2 

I.  I 

»— I      CO 

t— I 
>— I 

a 

n 
< 


o 

o 

n 

s 

M 

« 

>^ 

'^ 

K 

s 

Q 

o 

•< 

^ 

m 

Q 

« 

*i 

0 

O 

ci 

oo 

o 
H 

'^ 

>> 

o 

> 

BS 

Q 

s» 

0 

< 

c 
o 

^ 

*^ 

<M 

o 

s 

E 

00 

"" 

Ph 

M 

00 

to 

■-S  C3 

cs-;^ 

^ 

"3  & 
O   c3 

s 

.i:0 

6» 

1  ^ 

Sg 

'". 

«. 

C3 

£«■ 

C.-2 

Ift 

GO 

Q 

^ 

E 

o 

> 

a 

'-' 

d 

» 

J 

a 

Q 

d 

6 

Z 

z 

|u 


3  3 

CO 


C3i« 
3 

a 


ko 


■2 


Sa 


lil 


So 


z    z; 


z    z 


COST   OF   DISTRIBUTING   MILK.  43 


Cost  of  Delivery  of  Special  Milk. 

Fortunately  reliable  data  were  secured  from  four  distributors  who  had 
kept  accurate  accounts  for  a  number  of  years.  Two  of  these  produced 
and  distributed  what  they  termed  "special"  milk  —  unpasteurized,  but 
held  to  be  equal  in  purity  and  cleanliness  to  certified  milk.  The  term 
"special"  is  very  unsatisfactory.  There  is  no  standard  for  such  milk. 
Whether  the  term  means  anything  depends  on  the  producer  and  seller. 
Frequently  the  milk  is  of  excellent  quality.  In  these  instances  it  is  sold 
to  the  consumer  at  12  cents  per  quart.  This  "special"  milk  entails  extra 
care,  extra  labor  and  good  equipment  and  requires  a  special  market; 
moreover,  the  distributors  must  of  necessity  travel  far  to  dispose  of  their 
product.  Distributor  No.  1  traversed  47  miles  daily  to  dispose  of  350 
quarts  —  but  7.45  quarts  per  mile  traveled.  In  case  No.  2,  15  miles  were 
traveled  daily  to  dispose  of  83  quarts  of  "special"  milk,  19  quarts  of 
skimmed  milk,  and  4.9  quarts  of  cream;  disregarding  the  skimmed  milk, 
this  is  equal  to  5.86  quarts  of  "special"  milk  and  cream  per  mile  traveled. 

No.  1  has  much  higher  depreciation  and  maintenance  expense  than 
No.  2,  due  to  the  use  of  a  Ford  car  and  White  motor  truck.  The  extra 
cost,  however,  is  offset  by  the  reduced  cost  of  labor,  which  is  but  a  trifle 
more  than  a  third  that  of  No.  2  ($11.11  as  against  $31.42  per  1,000  quarts). 
At  least  twelve  hours  of  labor  were  saved  daily  at  15  cents  per  hour.  As 
in  the  case  of  distributors  of  market  milk,  the  same  conclusion  can  be 
drawn  from  the  above  figures,  namely,  economic  distribution  depends  on 
the  number  of  quarts  per  horse,  in  conjunction  with  the  quarts  per  mile. 

Cost  of  Collection  and  Distribution  of  Wholesale  Milk  in  Cans. 

These  figures  demonstrate  the  reasonableness  of  calculating  one-half 
cent  per  quart  for  the  cost  of  delivering  wholesale  milk,  as  we  have  done 
in  the  case  of  mixed  delivery  in  the  figures  given  in  the  previous  pages. 
In  this  plant  the  cost  was  a  little  more  than  three-fourths  of  a  cent  per 
quart  including  collection  from  producers.  Two  hours  daily  were  occu- 
pied by  a  man  and  two  horses  for  collecting  and  six  hours  for  delivery. 
It  is  contended,  however,  that  the  motor  truck  is  more  economical  for 
wholesale  delivery,  provided  the  truck  can  be  kept  fully  occupied  and  the 
location  will  permit  its  use  during  the  winter. 


44 


MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    173. 


Table   XIV. 


Investment. 


Depreciation. 


Maintenance. 


Buildings, 
Equipment, 
Horses, 
Totals, 


$1,280 
597 
600 


S38  40 
62  50 
65  00 


S70  50 


258  37 


82,477 


$165  90 


8328  87 


Circulating  capital:  — 

Ice $100  00 

Interest,      . 123  85 

Shrinkage, 86  68 

Other 91  20 

Total 

Labor 


Total  costs,  . 

Milk  handled:  — 

Daily  (quarts),  . 

Yearly  (quarts). 
Cost  per  quart  (cents), 
Cost  per  mile  (cents),   . 
Mileage'  — 

Collection, 

Delivery,    . 
Customers,     . 
Quarts  per  customer, 
Miles  per  customer. 
Quarts  per  mile,    . 
Quarts  per  horse,  . 


.  $401  73 
.  $803  00 
$1,699.50 


6000 
219,000 

.78 
24.00 

4 
15 
12 
50 

1.58 

31.60 

300 


Motor  Truck  Delivery. 

The  actual  cost  figures  of  motor  truck  milk  delivery  are  of  interest  in 
view  of  the  increasing  prevalence  of  these  vehicles.  Notice  that  the  per 
mile  cost  for  horse  delivery  as  given  above  is  24  cents  based  on  about  7,000 
miles  traveled  yearly.  The  costs  below  are  based  on  10,000  miles  annually. 
Under  ordinary  conditions  the  truck  equipment  would  deliver  the  milk 
on  the  above  route  in  four  hours,  one-half  the  time  taken  by  horses. 

The  operating  cost  of  a  motor  truck  suitable  for  distribution  of  whole- 
sale milk  or  of  "special  milk,"  where  the  haul  is  long  or  loads  are  heavy, 
is  given  below.  These  figures  apply  to  a  White  motor  truck,  three-quarters 
to  1  ton,  in  actual  operation  (1915)  by  a  producing  distributor  of  milk. 

Per  Mile. 

Gasoline, $0.0100 

Oil, 0016 

Grease,  waste,  etc.,  ..........         .0010 

Running  expenses,     ...........  0050 

Tires,  total  cost  per  set,  $175;   guaranteed  mileage,  5,000,      .  .  .  .0350 

Overhauling  and  painting  after  20,000  miles,  approximately  $350,  .  .  0175 

Interest  5  per  cent,  depreciation  20  per  cent,  on  an  investment  of  $2,250 

=$562.50  on  approximate  yearly  mileage  of  10,000,  .....  0562 
Insurance  (fire  11  per  cent.,  collision  2g  per  cent.)  on  $2,250  =  $96.18  on 

mileage  of  10,000, 0096 

Driver,  $850  per  year,  over  mileage  of  10,000,       ......  0850 

Total  cost  per  mile $0.2209 


COST   OF   DISTRIBUTING   MILK. 


45 


Cost  of  Distribution  of  Cream. 

The  distribution  of  cream  exclusively  is  analogous  to  the  distribution  of 
"special"  or  of  certified  milk,  excepting  that  the  cost  of  delivery  is  increased 
because  the  overhead  charges  are  high  in  comparison  with  the  quantity 
delivered.  Cream  from  dealers  who  delivered  a  small  quantity  of  cream 
to  their  regular  milk  customers  is  not  subject  to  this  high  overhead  charge 
and  need  not  be  considered  here.  Only  one  plant  delivering  cream  exclu- 
sively is  included  in  this  study.  A  summarized  statement  of  its  expenses 
is  presented  below.  These  figures  take  no  account  of  bottles  which  were 
paid  for  by  the  customers.  Notwithstanding  this  fact,  the  long  route  and 
small  daily  delivery  raises  the  cost  to  more  than  7.5  cents  (S0.0759)  per 
quart,  as  against  4.5  and  6.1  cents  for  retailing  "special"  milk. 


Summary  of  Costs  of  delivering  Cream  {One  Plant) . 
Depreciation,  ......... 

Maintenance,  ......... 

Circulating  capital,  ........ 

Labor,  .......... 

Total  yearly  cost,    ........ 


Cost  p«r  1,000  quarts  yearly, 

Cream  delivered  yearly  (quarts). 

Cream  delivered  daily  (six  days  a  week)  (quarts). 

Customers,   . 

Quarts  per  customer, 

Cost  per  quart  to  deliver, 

Miles  traveled, 

Cost  per  mile. 

Quarts  per  mile,     . 

Miles  per  customer. 

Customers  per  mile, 


$112  23 

543  25 

399  10 

1,155  90 

$2,210  48 

$75  91 

29,120 

93.3 

95 

.98 

$0.0759 

18 

$0.33 

5.18 

.19 

5.3 

Significant  Facts  of  Distribution  showing  Individual  Variations. 

Table  XV  is  an  attempt  to  exhibit  the  salient  facts  of  milk  delivery  by 
individual  milkmen.  Amherst  and  Walpole  distributors  are  not  included; 
wholesale  dealers  and  those  using  motor  trucks,  cream  and  skimmed-milk 
handlers  and  those  who  furnished  imperfect  data  are  also  omitted. 


46         MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    173. 


<5i  -5^ 


11 

C     ^ 


oq 


ZCi  -^ 

G:t 

-^^ 

S>  "^ 

r? 

a.  « 

»w 

S     cc 

c 

^'^  s 

o 

1   ^ 

r^ 

1 

H— . 

^  -S^ 

~ 

>^-g 

.O 

W  "«3 

2; 

►J     s- 

n 

•< 

H 

:;-       1 

£&S5 

00 

Quar 
cr  D 
hole 
d  Re 

1-,  o  t>.o 

"■ 

a 

o  aJ 

£3 

lO  t^o  t~ 

t- 

05  CC  O— ' 

c^ 

U» 

r^o^ 

=  ^S^ 

o      9- 

c 

-a  o 

s-g^i. 

o  ooo 

o 

ooc  ooo 

ca 

§2t:-§ 

w~i              T-H 

C3 

^ 

oinor- 

CO 

is 

CO 

o  a 

a  < 

&< 

J  E- 

[fj 

S  5 

_: 

OlOOO 

^H 

D 

it 

z- 

o 

-3 

g 

U5  .-4  ^  ut. 
0(N  C^4  -.*< 

? 

..H  ^^  .-*  1^ 

Oh 

T3 

c 

f.  < 

a 

■»■   B- 

a 

^ 

3 

'.d 

o 

-^s 

o 

e 

0 

a 

a 

5^ 

<-• 

« 

a 

s 

2 

< 

T* 

OO  OOOCCi 
00  C^  Tt<  *C -^  -^  I 


J  oo*c  o  o  o  o 
.  t-»  iC  t^  t~*  c^  o  <-> 


■rJ«tCOCCO(M.— '■— 't— QOCJOOfMO 


OOOOOOCMOOOOOOCO 
O»0OM40»OC^iC00TfOO(MO 


O-^tM^-^WCOCgN-^M^N^HC^ 


C0C0COC2OG000Q0a0C:>OCb0)C» 


COST   OF   DISTRIBUTING   MILK. 


47 


r- 1  ^  CO  ^ 


ec-^iOM      r- c<i  CO  lo  c^  c^  Tf  c^  04  ^ 


inooooooiftooooioooo 


r-         t-.  csi  ^ 


iOOOOCmrPOCCt^COOOOOC 


OOOOCO'»**CSOOOO<MOOQiO 
COOCIOO'-'COi.'^GOOtOiOCO^OCq 
e5iC'<rcO:SC^COCOOt-^COiOC^«M(M 


C^)c^*^^C^^i4,H'^t>>COC4C^]C^lMi-ii-^ 


00^-N^'-HC^C^C^CCCOCO-*rJ*'«et*-^ 


1,217 
690 
330 
500 
928 
257 

2,320 
320 
525 

1,654 
480 
431 
447 

I- 

mooot-t^iffloomNOt^in 

CO 

j;;2g2;32Jgg2S;g22 

•*ccoo>otoi»toooootooo 

o 

M— .— 1— .M  — (MCO  — C4iic4^ 

ooooooooooooo 

ooNooinoMOinooioo-.  cc 

Ol 

irsinoiMt^uicoooooeoo 

s 

,^  -Tji  CC  ■*  00  ^  0_CC  M  TT  CO  -^  CO 

1 

•"S-CMNNCOrtt^CqlMO— NIM 

-H,-.^t^C-10000CS--HOt^iCt^ 

*c»cir5ici^t^t>-r^QOoooooi03 

1 

C^C^C-JCqiMCsIC^IC^C^C^lMC^C^ 

M 

1 

1 

48 


MASS.    EXPERIMENT    STATION   BULLETIN    173. 


J 


CO       » 


•2  0» 


1   « 


60 


%> 


S5     ?i.^ 

H     CO     « 

"^  ^  -« 
I  -  i 

CD  i  2 
I  *^^ 

n 


Quarts 

per  Day, 

Wholesale 

and  Retail. 

675 
376 
834 
360 
324 
300 

1,315 
810 
451 
218 

3,392 
353 

CO 

E5 

1 

oinu5oe<iooooocroccr~ 

0 

~  eo  to  CO -^  iM  eo  S  i=i      co-h 

Quarts 
retailed  per 

Mile 
per  Wagon. 

15  0 
54.0 
56  3 
48.0 
26.8 
26.0 
41.5 
54  2 
14.6 
8.0 
35.7 
19  3 

g 

Miles 

traveled 

per  Wagon 

daily. 

OOOOOOU5000010 

r^ 

X 

<    . 
a  J 

0  5 

iJ  H 
C  W 

m 

H  H 
M  < 
■< 
D 

ooioooooor*ot^coio 

—1  (M  OJ  IM  (M  cq  M  (M  (M        ea— ■ 

0 

1 

300 
218 
450 
240 
268 
260 

1,080 

650 

440 

97 

3,146 
290 

0 
0 

Number 
of  Routes. 

IM«N««rtM<COe<l  — -HC^ 

I 

m 

H 

•0 

-3 

13 

Sg§-22?;?5SS?Sg 

1 

COCOeOCOC<5C<5COCOtOCOC<5CO 

c. 

3 
0 

a 

0 

■ 

c 
C 

SS 
H 

n 
s 

i 

< 

1,065 
152 
374 
306 
289 
107 
295 

0 

CO 

3S.9 
8.0 
16.7 
41.6 
18.7 
9  7 
9  3 

0 

59  1 
10.0 
30.8 
31.0 
22.0 
6.8 
11.6 

0 
0 

0000000 

CO  10  c^i  X)  -^  10  10 

0 
0 

i«  0  0  CO  00  M  0 

»o  «:>  r^  00  00  0  t^ 

s 

1,065 
150 
370 
186 
175 
102 
175 

CO 

CO  -H  1^  —  n  »-*  l-H 

1 

r     3.66 
3.68 

3.82 
4.47 
4.70 
5  34 
5  57 

1 

i 

Over  3.5 

I 

i^ 

si 

> 
-1; 

COST   OF   DISTRIBUTING    MILK.  49 

The  per  quart  costs  of  retail  delivery  of  the  66  distributors  considered 
are  approximately  as  follows:  — 

4,  or  6  per  cent.,  less  than  1.5  cents. 
14,  or  21  per  cent.,  between  1.5  and  2  cents. 
16,  or  24  per  cent.,  between  2  and  2.5  cents. 
13,  or  20  per  cent.,  between  2.5  and  3  cents. 
12,  or  18  per  cent.,  between  3  and  3.5  cents. 

7,  or  11  per  cent.,  over  3.5  cents. 

The  first  striking  observation  is  the  wide  variation  in  costs,  and  the 
comparatively  imiform  distribution  between  1.5  and  3.5  cents. 

The  second  is  the  fact  that  there  is  no  marked  correlation  between  costs 
and  size  of  business;  dealers  distributing  300  quarts  or  less  and  dealers 
distributing  more  than  1,000  quarts  daily  are  found  in  every  group  except 
the  first.  The  third  group  contains  as  many  dealers  handhng  less  than  500 
quarts  daily  as  any  group  and  more  dealers  handling  more  than  1,000 
quarts  daily  than  any  other  group. 

Third,  considered  by  groups,  the  cost  per  quart  of  retailing  increases 
and  the  size  of  the  retail  load  decreases  from  the  first  to  the  sixth  group. 
It  should  be  noted  that  the  high  average  retail  load  of  the  first  group  is 
due  to  one  dealer  whose  load  was  exceptionally  heavy. 

Fourth,  some  correlation  is  discernible  between  the  number  of  quarts 
retailed  per  mile  of  haul  and  the  cost  per  quart,  the  more  quarts  per  mUe 
the  less  the  cost;  but  the  correlation  is  not  consistent.  The  average 
delivery  for  Group  III  is  29.5  quarts  per  mile;  that  of  Group  V  is  30.9 
quarts  per  mile,  though  the  average  cost  per  quart  of  delivery  of  the  latter 
is  about  50  per  cent,  higher  than  the  former.  These  two  factors,  how- 
ever —  the  size  of  the  load  and  the  density  of  delivery  (quarts  per  mile) 
—  are  two  very  important  considerations  in  milk  delivery. 

Fifth,  the  individual  variations  in  the  number  of  quarts  retailed  per 
mile  per  wagon,  within  the  groups,  are  very  significant.  In  Group  I, 
for  example,  one  dealer  distributes  23  and  another  68  quarts  per  mile. 
In  Group  II  the  variations  run  from  15  to  70;  in  Group  III,  from  10  to 
70,  and  in  Group  V,  from  8  to  56  quarts  per  mile.  Under  these  condi- 
tions it  is  very  evident  that  the  costs  of  milk  delivery  must  vary  tre- 
mendously. 

Finally,  the  cost  of  delivery  is  closely  related  to  the  miles  traveled  per 
customer  (or,  inversely,  the  number  of  customers  per  mile),  running  from 
one-thirtieth  of  a  mile  between  dehveries  in  the  first  group  to  one-nine- 
teenth of  a  mile  in  the  sixth  group.  Nothing  more  strikingly  indicates 
the  individual  differences  in  delivery  conditions  than  the  customers  served 
per  mile  traveled.  The  first  group  contains  one  dealer  with  a  record  of  68 
customers  and  another  with  only  10  customers  a  mile.  The  third  group 
shows  variations  between  9  and  nearly  60  customers.  Group  V  has  one 
dealer  who  serves  62  customers  a  mile,  and  another  who  serves  less  than 
3.  The  significance  of  these  relationships  will  be  considered  under 
"Disadvantages  of  Competitive  Distribution." 


50  MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    173. 


Some  Obvious  Disadvantages  in  Competitive  Distribution  of  Milk. 

The  investigation  clearly  indicates  the  very  wide  diversity  of  costs  in 
the  retailing  of  milk.  At  the  same  time  the  milk-retailing  service  under 
competitive  conditions  is  fairly  satisfactory.  The  consumer  usually  gets 
his  milk  on  time  and  in  such  quantities  as  he  requires.  If  the  quaUty  of 
milk  delivered  by  one  dealer  is  not  satisfactory,  several  others  are  available. 
It  is  questionable,  however,  whether  the  consumer  does  not  pay  roundly 
for  this  competitive  service.  Several  economic  disadvantages  may  be 
indicated. 

1.  Overcapitalization.  —  The  great  majority  of  the  plants  visited  are  of 
one  or  two  wagon  capacity.  Eighty-four  per  cent,  of  them  deliver  1,000 
quarts  or  less  daily;  59  per  cent.,  500  quarts  or  less;  and  23  per  cent., 
300  or  less.  To  meet  the  demands  of  his  customers,  comply  with  the  milk 
regulations  and  compete  with  other  milkmen  the  progressive  dealer  in- 
stalls machinery  for  washing,  filling  and  capping  bottles,  clarifying,  pas- 
teurizing and  cooling  his  milk. 

One  recognizes  that  milk  is  highly  perishable  and  that  the  time  for 
the  processing  is  necessarily  short.  Some  dealers,  however,  have  installed 
pasteurizers  capable  of  disposing  of  400  gallons  per  hour,  although  their 
total  quantity  handled  is  but  900  quarts  per  day.  Some  have  bottle-fillers 
filling  12  bottles  at  once  when  handling  only  350  bottles  daily.  This  means 
running  the  plant  below  its  capacity.  A  few  dealers  have  buildings  or 
horses  and  wagons  much  more  ample  and  expensive  than  necessary.  In 
some  instances  the  total  investment  runs  to  1.5  cents  (S0.015)  a  quart 
sold  yearly,  whereas  the  average  investment  for  that  size  of  business  is 
less  than  one-half  cent  ($0.0043)  a  quart;  in  other  instances  the  invest- 
ment is  3.4  cents  a  quart  when  the  average  is  less  than  1  cent  (.SO. 0095) 
per  quart  for  plants  of  similar  capacity. 

2.  Small  Daily  Deliveries  per  Horse.  —  A  load  for  a  good  horse  over  a 
good  load  is  300  quarts  of  milk  in  bottles  but  the  investigation  disclosed 
the  fact  that  the  usual  load  is  much  less.  The  average  load  of  10  dis- 
tributors in  Springfield  is  216  quarts  per  horse  (307  per  wagon),  and  of 
28  Worcester  milkmen,  234.4  quarts  per  horse  (346.1  per  wagon),  including 
wholesale  milk  in  cans.  On  the  other  hand,  a  rather  large  percentage  of 
dealers  haul  300  quarts  or  more  per  wagon.  More  than  12  per  cent,  of 
the  milkmen  retail  15  quarts  or  less  per  mile  of  travel  in  contrast  to 
nearly  14  per  cent,  who  average  more  tlian  55  quarts  a  mile.  The  average 
delivery  is  about  32  quarts  per  mile  per  wagon.  That  the  size  of  load 
bears  a  direct  relation  to  the  cost  of  deUvery  is  shown  in  Table  XV. 

3.  Long  Hauls  are  usually  Uneconomical.  —  Several  instances  can  be 
cited  of  distributors  who  traveled  from  10  to  15  miles  to  retail  from  100 
to  200  quarts  of  milk.  When  the  distributor  is  a  long  distance  from  his 
market  or  when  the  distance  between  stops  is  great,  there  is  a  consider- 
able waste  both  in  man  and  horse  labor  through  lost  time.  This  is  some- 
what offset  by  the  drivers  making  their  daily  entries  during  these  intervals. 


COST   OF   DISTRIBUTING   MILK.  51 

More  than  20  per  cent,  of  the  routes  average  14  miles  long  and  almost 
half  of  them  average  13  miles. 

4.  Loss  of  Bottles.  —  In  Worcester  30  dealers,  delivering  15,809  quarts 
per  day,  claim  a  loss  of  $4,913.42  yearly  in  bottles.  Most  of  the  loss  in 
bottles  is  the  fault  of  consumers.  Bottles  are  frequently  unfit  for  service 
when  returned  and  many  dealers  state  that  they  destroy  such  bottles. 
Milk  bottles  are  handy  receptacles  during  preserving  season,  and  one 
dealer  told  of  a  housewife  who  proudly  exhibited  100  quart  bottles  filled 
with  preserves  and,  to  add  insult  to  injury,  asked  him  for  a  sufficient 
number  of  caps  to  cover  them. 

5.  Bad  Debts.  —  This  waste  is  common  to  all  businesses  which  extend 
credit  but  the  competitive  milk  dealer  suffers  more  than  ordinary  loss 
because  unscrupulous  persons  have  a  variety  of  methods  for  evading  the 
pajnnent  of  small  bills.  To  prevent  this  loss  many  dealers  make  special 
trips  for  collecting.  Bad  debts  cost  Springfield  and  Worcester  about  2^ 
per  cent,  of  all  costs  of  distribution.  These  losses  aggregate  $0.54  per 
1,000  quarts  in  Springfield  and  $0.82  per  1,000  quarts  in  Worcester.  The 
loss  depends  entirely  on  the  class  of  trade,  however,  and  no  comparisons 
or  general  conclusions  should  be  drawn  from  these  figures. 

6.  Shrinkage.  —  This  loss,  seemingly  insignificant,  amounts  to  a  con- 
siderable sum  in  the  course  of  a  year.  It  cannot,  however,  be  wholly 
charged  to  distribution,  as  a  certain  amount  is  lost  in  transportation 
through  carelessness  in  transit  and  leaky  and  dented  cans.  A  good  filling 
apparatus  reduces  this  loss  to  a  minimum  in  the  dairy  and  whatever  loss 
may  be  sustained  in  transit  is  probably  borne  by  the  producer  who  ships 
in  cans.  In  general  the  shipper  receives  payment  for  only  8  quarts  per 
can,  though  the  can  usually  contains  8j  to  8^  quarts. 

7.  Surplus  and  Spoilage.  —  This  item  is  considerable  in  all  towns  and 
cities  visited  and  it  is  one  of  the  great  and  ever-present  problems  which 
the  dealer  is  trying  to  overcome.  Three  factors  contribute  to  the  problem 
of  surplus  milk :  — 

(a)  Restaurants  and  lunch  counters  which  close  on  Sunday. 

(6)  Decreased  demand  owing  to  depopulation  of  cities  during  summer. 

(c)   Excessive  production  of  milk  at  certain  seasons. 

The  solution  of  the  first  factor  is  the  business  of  the  dealer.  But  to 
solve  the  question  of  decreased  consumption,  which  occurs  regularly  and 
covers  a  long  period,  and  of  overproduction  during  certain  months  of  the 
year  is  really  the  business  of  the  producer. 

Closely  alUed  to  shrinkage  and  surplus  is  spoilage.  Milk  which  cannot 
be  deUvered  at  once  is  very  likely  to  sour  and  so  become  a  total  loss. 
Naturally  this  waste  is  more  prevalent  dining  the  summer  at  the  time  of 
surplus  production.  The  producer  who  delivers  his  own  milk  can  some- 
times regulate  the  supply  by  producing  more  winter  milk,  by  feeding  some 
milk  to  calves  or  pigs,  or  he  may  be  able  to  sell  it  to  a  creamery.  The 
small  dealer  can  do  little  but  dump  the  surplus  into  the  sewer. 

In  the  aggregate  the  question  of  surplus  milk  is  a  big  one  which  many 


52  MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    173. 

dealers,  large  and  small,  have  wrestled  with  for  years  with  little  success. 
An  emergency  butter  and  cheese  factory  managed  co-operatively,  which 
will  utilize  part  of  the  existing  equipment  and  take  care  of  all  the  extra 
milk,  is,  perhaps,  the  best  suggestion.  Some  rehef  will  come  from  a  form 
of  contract  with  the  producers  which  pro\ddes  for  definite  variations  in 
supply.    At  best  there  will  always  be  a  loss  at  this  point. 

The  loss  sustamed  by  10  dealers  in  Springfield,  delivering  9,600  quarts 
wholesale  and  retail  daily,  amounted  to  Sl,661.50  per  year,  or  52  cents 
per  1,000  quarts  retailed  annually.  This  does  not  represent  the  whole 
value  of  the  milk;  it  was  disposed  of  at  the  above  loss. 

8.  Duplication  in  Routes.  — ^  The  economic  waste  through  duplication 
of  milk  routes  was  evidenfm  all  the  towns  and  cities  visited.  From  per- 
sonal observation,  at  an  apartment  house  containing  four  families,  three 
milkmen  called  to  deUver  4  quarts  of  milk;  at  another  fourth-floor  tene- 
ment three  different  milkmen  climb  four  flights  every  day  to  deUver  6 
pints  to  four  famiUes.  Between  the  hours  of  3  a.m.  and  7  a.m.  42  milk 
wagons  were  observed  to  pass  down  Bowdoin  Street,  Worcester;  only  one 
failed  to  deposit  milk  within  a  distance  of  400  yards  from  the  observer. 
Similar  conditions  were  found  in  all  the  other  towns  and  cities  \isited. 

In  Worcester  103  one-horse  milk  wagons  and  62  two-horse  wagons 
average  approximately  8^  miles  per  wagon  per  day;  the  64  Worcester 
retail  routes  considered  in  this  study  aggregate  565  miles,  8.83  miles  per 
route.  Eight  and  one-half  miles  is  probably  a  conservative  estimate  for 
approximately  265  milk  wagons  distributing  milk  daily  in  Worcester. 
The  total  pubUc  street  mileage  within  the  city  Hmits  is  220,  but  several 
miles  are  practically  unoccupied.  These  milk  wagons  cover  approxi- 
mately 2,250  miles  daily  to  supply  the  houses  on  less  than  220  miles  of 
streets.  Probably  they  travel  10  to  14  times  the  populated  street  mileage 
every  day.     -. 

Duplication  of  deUvery  routes  is  common  to  all  retail  business,  but  in 
large  cities  measures  have  been  taken  to  overcome  this  waste  through 
central  deUvery  agencies,  where  the  parcels  are  assembled,  sorted  and 
delivered  regularly.  The  system  has  proved  economical  but  the  objections 
to  this  method  for  the  deUvery  of  milk  are  too  serious  to  overcome,  except 
by  the  establishment  of  a  co-operative  milk  plant. 

9.  Another  economic  waste  generally  overlooked,  common  to  other 
commodities  as  well  as  milk,  is  shipping  to  other  markets  than  the  local 
one.  Why  should  Worcester,  the  center  of  one  of  the  finest  dairying 
sections,  draw  on  Maine  for  its  milk  supply,  when  milk  produced  in  the 
\icinity  of  Worcester  is  shipped  to  Boston?  Other  things  being  equal, 
the  local  market  is  the  best  market.  Long-distance  shipments  are  expen- 
sive to  some  one,  and  cause  shrinkage  and  deterioration  in  quality.  The 
producei;  in  Massachusetts  is  in  the  very  favorable  position  of  having  his 
market  at  his  very  door,  yet  he  frequently  seeks  one  further  afield  at 
necessarily  increased  cost  to  the  consumer  or  a  smaller  return  to  him. 


COST   OF   DISTRIBUTING   MILK.  53 


Suggestions   for  improving  Conditions. 

1.  Keeping  adequate  accounts  to  show  cost  of  operation  and  calling 
attention  to  wasteful  methods  and  inefficiencies.  A  little  study  will  show 
many  leaks  which  can  often  very  easily  be  stopped. 

2.  Standardizing  distribution.  The  data  indicate  the  need  of  deter- 
mining what  is  adequate  and  eflScient  equipment  for  a  500,  800  or  1,200 
quart  deUvery.  Is  a  two-horse  load  with  one  driver  and  a  helper  or  the 
one-man,  one-horse  unit  the  more  economical?  None  of  these  things 
has  been  worked  out. 

To  answer  these  questions  completely  means  standardizing  the  milk- 
distributing  business;  the  answer  will  indicate  means  of  eliminating  waste, 
lessening  costs  and  increasing  service.  Many  such  studies  as  this  must  be 
made  but  even  this  first  one  indicates  some  points  of  attack.  Not  only 
should  the  individual  distributor  study  his  business,  but  organizations  of 
distributors  should  be  formed  in  each  town  and  city  for  mutual  improve- 
ment and  the  discussion  of  points  of  economy,  and  for  agreement  on  some 
div-ision  of  territory  to  lessen  duplication  of  routes  and  to  protect  their 
mutual  interests. 

3.  The  introduction  of  the  ticket  system  to  lessen  collection  costs  and 
save  time  in  deUvery.  The  investigation  indicates  that  the  use  of  tickets 
tends  to  eliminate  loss  of  bottles  and  bad  accounts. 

4.  Large  daily  dehveries  per  horse  and  per  driver.  Several  progressive 
firms  in  cities  not  here  considered  give  a  bonus  to  the  driver  for  all  de- 
liveries and  collections,  and  a  commission  on  all  new  business  above  a 
certain  minimum.  This  makes  it  an  object  for  the  driver  to  increase  his 
sales,  stop  at  a  few  more  doors,  obtain  new  customers  and  climb  addi- 
tional stairs.  Long  hauls  from  farm  to  delivery  district  are  costly  and 
the  longer  the  initial  haul  the  more  milk  dehveries  necessary  in  order  that 
this  high  initial  cost  may  be  offset. 

5.  Co-operative  deUvery.  But,  after  all  is  said,  the  final  adequate  solu- 
tion of  milk  distribution  will  come  only  through  municipal  delivery  or 
the  organization  of  producing  distributors.  In  small  cities  and  towns  a 
co-operative  milk  plant,  owned  and  managed  by  dairymen,  is  very  feasible. 
One  plant  could  easily  process  and  deliver  the  necessary  2,500  to  10,000 
quarts  per  day  and  solve  most  if  not  all  of  the  problems  of  economical 
and  adequate  supply. 

6.  Central  milk  plants.  The  problem  of  milk  distribution  in  large 
cities  is  difficult  but  the  organization  of  the  small  milkmen  operating  in 
one  section  of  a  city  into  a  distributing  agency  would  cure  many  ills  and 
bring  about  cheaper  deUvery.  Organization  of  seUing  is  an  old  matter  to 
manufacturers  and  merchandisers  but  not  to  dairymen.  The  difficulties 
are  personal,  but  sometimes  personal  jealousies  and  suspicions  are  fatal 
to  progress  and  profits. 

The  solution  of  the  milk  problem  is  in  the  hands  of  the  milk  producers 
and  dealers.    If  they  have  sufficient  courage,  foresight,  perseverance  and 


54         MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    173. 

determination  to  organize  for  the  study  of  their  own  business  and  the 
efficient  disposal  of  their  own  product,  all  concerned  will  benefit. 

The  dairymen  supplying  a  large  percentage  of  the  milk  of  Erie,  Pa., 
have  owned  and  operated  their  own  plant  for  years.  They  handle  milk, 
cream  and  ice  cream  and  not  only  distribute  an  excellent  quality  of  milk 
at  low  cost,  but  turn  over  to  the  producer  a  much  larger  percentage  of 
the  consumer's  price  than  he  ordinarily  obtains.  Their  success  commends 
their  methods  to  the  attention  of  progressive  distributors. 

They  point  to  the  following  achievements :  (1)  a  pure  milk  supply  with 
an  amazingly  low  bacterial  count;  (2)  a  lower  price  than  in  many  other 
cities;  (3)  elimination  of  duplicate  routes,  resulting  in  (4)  large  deliveries 
per  horse  and  driver;  (5)  concentration  in  large  and  convenient  plants ; 
(6)  economical  disposal  of  surplus  milk  by  means  of  a  condensery  which 
the  association  operates;  (7)  better  wages  to  employees  and  (8)  satis- 
factory prices  to  the  producers;  (9)  practical  elimination  of  the  difficulties 
which  usually  arise  between  producer  and  dealer;  (10)  no  wasteful  com- 
petition and  (11)  not  a  cent  paid  either  in  interest  or  dividends  to  the 
original  shareholders;  (12)  every  cent  of  net  receipts  has  gone  to  the 
producers,  to  the  plant  or  to  a  reserve  fund. 

Not  only  this,  but  this  method  places  the  distribution  on  such  a  basis 
that  the  town  authorities  could  supervise  the  supply  at  a  minimimi  cost  by 
co-operating  with  other  towns  similarly  situated.  The  cost  of  upkeep  of 
a  laboratory  for  a  chemist  and  inspector  in  a  small  town  is  prohibitive 
at  present,  but  if  borne  jointly  by  several  towns  the  expense  would  be 
reduced  to  a  figure  well  within  their  means.  The  advantages  obtained  by 
milk  inspection  are  too  well  known  to  need  consideration  here. 


BULLETIE^   ^o.    174. 


DEPARTMENT    OF    CHEMISTRY. 


THE  COMPOSITION,  DIGESTIBILITY  AND 
FEEDING   VALUE   OF  PUMPKINS. 


BY   J.   B.   LINDSEY. 


SUMMAEY   OF   THE   RESULTS. 

1.  The  pumpkin  contains  some  17  per  cent,  of  shell,  73  per  cent,  of 
flesh,  and  9  to  10  per  cent,  of  seed  and  connecting  tissue.  It  is  a  watery 
fruit,  showing  extremes  of  84  to  91  per  cent.,  with  an  average  of  88  per 
cent. 

2.  The  whole  pumpkin  is  relatively  rich  in  ash;  the  seed  shows  notice- 
ably less  ash  than  the  remainder  of  the  fruit. 

On  the  basis  of  dry  matter,  the  entire  pumpkin  contains  rather  more 
total  protein  than  is  found  in  grains  and  roots.  It  also  contains  some  18 
per  cent,  of  total  sugars,  of  which  one-third  was  found  to  be  present  in 
the  form  of  cane  sugar.  The  fruit  minus  the  seeds  contains  nearly  43  per 
cent,  of  total  sugars,  which  explains  in  a  measure  its  desirability  as  a  hu- 
man food.  The  pumpkin  seeds  are  very  rich  in  fat,  and  are  composed 
substantially  of  one-third  fat,  one-third  protein  and  one-fifth  fiber,  the 
balance  being  carbohydrates  and  ash. 

3.  A  number  of  digestion  trials  were  made  with  sheep,  and  showed  the 
pumpkin  to  be  about  81  per  cent,  digestible.  On  substantially  the  same 
water  basis,  and  allowing  for  the  increased  food  value  of  the  fat,  the  pump- 
kin appears  to  have  about  20  per  cent,  greater  feeding  A'alue  than  mangels 
and  turnips. 

4.  Feeding  experiments  were  made  with  dairj'  cows,  substituting  in  the 
ration  30  pounds  of  cut  pumpkins  for  5  pounds  of  hay.  The  results  se- 
cured indicated  that  5  to  6  pounds  of  pumpkins  were  equal  in  food  value 
to  1  pound  of  hay.  The  Vermont  station  concluded  that  2|  pounds  of 
pumpkins  were  about  equal  to  1  pound  of  silage,  and  that  6|  pounds  were 
fully  equal  to  1  pound  of  hay.  On  plage  66  will  be  found  the  conclusions 
of  other  investigators. 


56  MASS.   EXPERIMENT    STATION    BULLETIN    174. 

The  pumpldii  Iiad  a  tendency  to  increase  temporarily  the  fat  percentage 
in  the  milk,  due  e^^dentIy  to  the  oil  contained  in  the  seed. 

5.  The  seeds  appeared  to  be  free  from  any  injurious  effects  upon  the 
animals  when  fed  in  the  amounts  found  in  the  entire  fruit,  contrary  to 
the  notion  prevalent  among  many  farmers.  In  foreign  countries  they  are 
often  dried  and  ground,  and  serve  as  a  very  nutritious  and  harmless  food, 
if  not  fed  in  too  large  amounts. 

6.  It  is  not  considered  good  econom}^  to  grow  pumpkins  exclusively  as 
a  food  for  either  cows  or  pigs,  because  of  their  high  water  content  and 
poor  keeping  quality.  For  the  latter  reason  it  is  advisable  to  feed  them 
in  the  late  fall  or  early  winter.  In  one  instance  a  yield  of  9  tons  is  reported 
when  they  were  grown  exclusively,  on  which  basis  they  would  jdeld  about 
2,000  pounds  of  actual  food  material  (digestible  organic  matter  plus  fat 
multipUed  by  2.2)  as  against  3,000  pounds  derived  from  corn.  Their 
place  in  the  farm  economy  seems  in  a  way  to  have  been  discovered 
by  the  farmer,  namely,  in  their  limited  cultivation  together  with  corn. 

7.  They  may  be  fed  cut  reasonably  fine  at  the  rate  of  30  to  possibly  50 
pounds  per  head  daily,  in  place  of  6  to  10  pounds  of  ha}',  in  addition  to 
hay  and  a  reasonable  amount  of  grain.  It  is  not  advised  to  feed  them 
with  other  watery  foods  such  as  roots  and  silage. 

They  also  may  be  fed  (cut  fine)  to  pigs,  mixed  with  a  combination  of 
equal  parts,  by  weight,  of  corn  meal  and  fine  wheat  middlings,  or  with  a 
mixture,  bj'  weight,  of  95  parts  corn  meal  and  5  parts  of  digester  tankage. 
It  is  doubtful  if  it  pays  to  cook  them.  If  fed  in  too  large  amounts  dailj"" 
they  furnish  too  much  bulk  but  insufficient  nutriment,  and  as  a  result 
the  animals  are  likely  to  lose  in  flesh. 


COMPOSITION,   ETC.,   OF   PUMPKINS.  57 


COMPOSITION    OF   THE  PUMPKIN. 

The  ordinary  field  pumpkin  {Cucurbita  pepo)  is  planted  more  or  less 
by  New  England  farmers,  frequently  in  the  field  with  corn.  It  is  used 
as  a  human  food,  particularly  for  pies,  and  is  also  fed  to  pigs  and  to  dairy 
and  beef  cattle. 

Ulbricht  and  Kosutany  ^  have  shown  that  in  twelve  different  varieties 
of  the  genus  Cucurbita  the  parts  were  present  in  the  following  propor- 
tions: — 

Per  cent. 

Shell 17 

Flesh, 73 

Seed, 2 

Seed  and  supporting  tissue,     .........       7 

The  pumpkin  is  a  watery  fruit.  We  have  found  variations  of  from 
84.08  to  91.18  per  cent.,  with  an  average  of  87.53  per  cent,  in  four  lots 
grown  on  two  farms  in  two  different  years.  In  the  pumpkin  minus  the 
seeds  and  connecting  tissue  variations  of  from  90  to  94  per  cent,  were 
noted,  with  an  average  of  92.78  per  cent.,  while  the  seeds  contained  from 
43  to  47  per  cent.  The  seeds,  it  will  be  noted,  were  much  less  watery  than 
the  other  portions  of  the  fruit.  It  was  noted  that  the  ripe  pumpkins 
without  the  seeds  contained  4  per  cent,  less  water  than  the  same  material 
less  mature.  The  riper  the  fruit  and  the  drier  the  autumn  the  higher  will 
be  the  percentage  of  dry  matter. 

Other  investigators,  including  Dahlin,^  Braconnet,^  Zeunak,^  Gerardin,^ 
Wanderleben,^  found  in  10  sorts  of  the  entire  fruit  extremes  of  from  85.8 
to  94.2  per  cent,  of  water,  with  an  average  of  90  per  cent.  Storer  and 
Lewis, 2  with  5  varieties,  noted  variations  of  from  84.3  to  94.6  per  cent., 
with  an  average  of  90.41  per  cent.  HiUs  ^  found  87.9  and  90.1  per  cent, 
in  two  lots  of  field  pumpkins. 

On  the  basis  of  the  natural  moisture  the  four  lots  of  the  fruit  examined 
by  us  tested  as  follows :  — 

•  Landw.  Versuchsstationen,  32,  p.  231. 

*  After  Ulbricht,  already  cited. 

'  Vermont  Experiment  Station,  fourteenth  report,  Appendix,  p.  iv.,  and  sixteenth  report, 
Appendix,  p.  iii. 


58 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    174. 


o 

o 

o 

Q 

oo 

3 

M 

bt 

a  „; 

eo 

eo 

1  = 

- 

" 

^^ 

o 

o 

.^ 

■^ 

■* 

C4 

■     fe 

tj  i< 

W2 

oo 
eo 

00 

to 

in 

:o 

u 

2 

OJ 

o 

OJ 

-9< 

00 

oo 

^ 

.~i 

^H 

M 

,-t 

,-H 

P^ 

mtn 

f^ 

J^ 

Hx 

^Z 

■■^ 

3  O 

o 

o 

hS 

" 

'- 

fe 

o  c 

■^"S 

•* 

t^ 

^£ 

>o 

^ 

o 

o 

<; 

u 

oo 

00 

00 

"S 

o 

C-I 

,_, 

to 

00 

^ 

00 

00 

00 

w 

J 

b 

s 

•< 

ca 

> 

< 

'-' 

c^ 

CO 

■^ 

$2. 


&Q 


05 


.32 

1.89 

.57 

eo 

05 

1.67 
2.60 
2.14 

•* 

lo      ■*      e<i 

t- 

3.26 
6.14 
3  43 

OO 
IN 

.98 

1.22 

.98 

o 

CO      eo      CO 

CO      oo      t- 

^ 

lO        05        CO 

■*      r-      CO 

(M 

.78 
1.63 
1.09 

t^ 

o      ^~      00 

lO        t^        CO 

l« 

CO      o      o 
CO       o       o 

S    8    S 

CI 

'-J'     cm"     eo 

< 

zo 


O 


1        1 

I 

1       1 

1 

5   s 

S5    2 

CO 

o 

CO        ■* 

CO         C<) 

O          -H 

o 

CO        t^ 

CO        -* 

o 

00       "5 

00 
CO 

0>        U5 

00 

CO      to 

J5 

C5 

o      o 
o      o 

CO        t^ 

o 
o 

US 

«        <N 

> 

< 

COMPOSITION,   ETC.,   OF   PUMPKINS. 


59 


6 

to 

•^ 

05 

(-1  ^ 

o 
■^ 

03 

-a 

S 
< 

4 

05 

o  a 
5| 

o 

W5 

^ 
< 

O 

o 

g 

< 

?5, 


C^ 


cq 


c/2 


O 


a^ 


-H      rt      ■>}>      e^ 


to      to      oo 


00      o      eo 


o    ^ 


60  MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    174. 

In  order  to  make  a  fairer  comparison  of  the  composition  of  the  dry 
material,  the  average  results,  as  shown  in  table  on  page  58,  have  been 
calculated  to  a  water-free  basis,  as  shown  in  table  on  page  59. 

The  whole  pumpkin  contains  rather  less  ash  than  carrots  or  mangels, 
although  it  is  much  richer  in  mineral  matter  than  the  ordinarj^  grains. 
The  seed  is  much  poorer  in  ash  than  the  other  portion  of  the  fruit.  The 
dry  matter  of  the  entire  pumpkin  contains  rather  more  total  protein 
than  roots  or  grain,  with  a  portion  of  it  in  the  amido  form.  The  seeds 
were  found  to  be  very  rich  in  true  protein.  The  fiber  content  of  the  fruit 
is  noticeably  higher  than  in  roots.  The  seeds  have  more  fiber  than  the 
other  portion,  due  to  the  tough  seed  coat.  Nearly  all  of  the  fat  is  con- 
tained in  the  seed,  the  analysis  of  the  two  samples  showing  an  average  of 
37.49  per  cent.  The  pumpkin  contains  large  amounts  of  sugars;  in  the 
entire  fruit  one  notes  nearly  18  per  cent.,  of  which  substantially  one-third 
is  in  the  form  of  cane  sugar,  while  in  the  portion  free  from  seeds  42.52  per 
cent,  total  sugars  are  noted.  While  sugar  was  not  determined  in  the 
seeds,  it  is  evident  that  they  contain  little,  being  made  up  chiefly  of 
protein,  fat  and  fiber. 

Ulbricht  ^  and  Hills  ^  made  analyses  of  the  ordinary  field  pumpkins,  and 
Zaitschek,'  of  the  so-called  giant  pumpkin  {Cucurhita  maxima),  with  the 
following  results:  — 

'  Already  cited. 

'  Verraont  Experiment  Station,  fourteenth  report,  Appendix,  p.  iv.,  and  sixteenth  report 
Appendix,  p.  iii. 

'  Landw.  Jahrbiicher  35,  p.  245. 


COMPOSITION,   ETC.,   OF   PUMPKINS. 


61 


>> 

b   • 

2PS 

s 

o 

^ 

c^ 

«5 

1 

I 

1 

oi 

•^ 

3 

lO 

CO 

»o 

1 

£ 

a 

05     • 

o 

O 

o 

o 

o 

tK 

■*. 

cn 

Ui 

,      '^ 

Ol 

1^ 

. 

) 

CO 

U5 

m           «^ 

Cfl 

oo 

00      to 

OO 

CO 

CO 

o 

1 

CO 

ira 

O       oa 

"* 

eo 

00 

■^ 

o 

o>      »ra 

C-J 

"5 

■* 

CO 

(N            f-H 

CO 

C<l 

M       g 

CO 

13 

3 

CJ 

en 

s  ^ 

CM 

U3 
00 

<M 

° 

^ 

,_, 

c^ 

•* 

-*  t^ 

CO 

1- 

N 

U5 

K 

H 

lO 

'^ 

« 

>a 

•< 

OS 

lO 

■* 

s  s 

05 

00 

,^ 

o 

C>] 

t^ 

»— ' 

TJ* 

d"c3 

' 

o 

U3 

O        CO 

CO 

tp 

>o 

<M 

»o 

"sS 

■* 

PM 

M 

eo 

C<J         lO 

C<1 

US 

3 

O 

>o 

O        CO 

Ol 

lO 

"a 

U5 

c<i 

s 

PL, 

O 

c^ 

a"      • 

CD 

Oi 

r* 

CO 

IM 

1 

1 

1 

See 
ess  S 

Dr 
Matt 

•<»< 

eo 

CO 

to 

" 

m 

Sd 

CO 

■* 

UJ 

CJ 

05 

t~ 

CO 

eo 

o 

^ 

•* 

t^ 

t)3 

M 

(M 

eo 

fi 

gw 

• 

s 

CB 

K 

m 

>> 

t^ 

_  '-  .- 

& 

2Pfe 

1 

•n 

CO 

1       "^ 

■o 

1 

I 

1 

tt> 

■^ 

CO 

fl.ti'S 

CO 

W2S 

li* 

2.-S 

05 

in 

eo 

t^ 

CO 

I 

I 

1 

s 

«M 

t-t 

lO 

II 

o> 

CO 

a 

C3 

M 

bO 

>. 

o 

•3 

_0 

1 

o 

'53 

"eS 

4> 

S 

o 

a 

a 

0, 

p. 

^ 

^ 

C3 

s 
1 

fe" 

0. 

f-l 

3 

•4-> 

ja 

3 

2    1 

13 

^ 

m 

fi 

>4 

03 

<Q 

"3 

^ 

< 

o 

H     fe 

w 

f^ 

Ph 

U 

62  MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    174. 

These  figures  agree  with  those  secured  in  this  laboraton-.  Thej'  show 
a  high  water  content  in  the  natural  fruit  and  a  relatively  high  percentage 
of  crude  protein.  The  seed  is  shown  to  be  particularly  rich  in  protein  and 
oil,  and  quite  low  in  carbohj^drate  matter. 


DIGESTIBILITY   OF   PUMPKINS. 

A  number  of  digestion  trials  were  made  in  two  successive  years,  using 
two  sheep  in  each  case.  The  pumpkins  were  fed  together  with  hay  and 
also  with  hay  and  gluten  feed  as  basal  rations.  The  entire  details  of  the 
experiment  will  be  pubhshed  elsewhere.  The  coefficients  of  digestibiHty 
only  are  given  in  the  table  on  page  63. 


COMPOSITION,   ETC.,   OF   PUMPKINS. 


63 


^ 

■«« 

«  a 

05 

t^ 

t^ 

o 

05 

CO 

o 

t^ 

CO 

CO 

«o 

to 

oi 

OO 

•^ 

^ 

o 

C5 

00 

o 

00 

00 

o 

o 

ip  o 

fe 

^ 

*^  ^-a^j" 

Extrac 

Mattel 

digeste 

Per  Cen 

■^ 

C^ 

■^ 

o 

o 

CO 

c^ 

CB 

s 

.-< 

QO 

■^ 

CO 

CO 

00 

^ 

00 

o 

CO 

o 

CO 

CO 

OO 

00 

02 

o 

^^ 

^ 

"3ti 

tn    0)    C 

•^ 

^ 

o 

O 

o 

eo 

Oi 

115 

CO 

»o 

■^ 

o 

:2  So 

fe.£P>- 

OJ 

«5 

CO 

b-i 

CO 

OO 

la 

00 

00 

•* 

^ 

eo 

s 

-^^ 

^ 

Crude 

Protein 

digested 

Percent. 

o 

o> 

o 

o 

CO 

o 

OO 

CO 

U5 

■^ 

CO 

t- 

CO 

CO 

CO 

00 

CO 

r- 

t^ 

' 

^ 

■Jti 

|s6 

c^ 

CO 

CO 

Oi 

lo 

cq 

U5 

o 

Ci 

o> 

o 

CO 

OO 

o 

-«< 

"^ 

CO 

o 

c^ 

OO 

CJ 

CO 

"3 

t>- 

CO 

CO 

■* 

t~ 

CO 

^   (V 

fe 

11^ 

1^., 

c^ 

M 

CO 

o 

,_, 

r- 

05 

00 

eo 

CO 

c^ 

00 

M< 

U5 

»o 

o 

^ 

OO 

OO 

UD 

»o 

o 

t^ 

00 

00 

OO 

t- 

t^ 

OO 

P"S 

.s   -^ 

i-Tsi 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

1 

g 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

S<2  2 

3      O 

o 

o_ 

o^ 

o 

<M 

M 

M 

^ 

" 

" 

cj 

PL,     ii 

c-s^ 

5-g 

1 

1 

1 

1 

o 

o 

e^j 

1 

3T3  cs 

•o 

—    0)    t. 

^^s 

■o--- 

<2S 

o 

o 

o 

o 

^ 

^ 

C>J 

1 

^s 

lO 

■o 

o 

o 

>o 

o 

U5 

•o 

•^ 

WS 

&0 

^1 

rH 

N 

rt 

IM 

M 

cq 

^ 

1 

« 

<! 

H 

>< 

<a 

2 

% 

■*" 

-^ 

«5 

»o 

W5 

lO 

« 

T 

Y 

T 

T 

1 

1 

V 

< 

M 

CO 

■* 

•* 

■* 

S 

s 

en 

2 

s 

2 

a, 
CO 


02 


CQ 


■^         OO 
O        CO 

1 

00      c.i 
o      o 

f2 

2 

«          CO 

CO       o 

CO 

iO        CO 
U5        C3 

OS 

CO        OO 

O        U3 

CO 

00 

o 

o_     o 

1 

1       1 

1 

o     o 

, 

—1        <M 

1 

T     T 

CO      eo 

0 

> 

< 

64         MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    174. 


One  notes  wider  variations  in  the  digestibility  of  the  different  ingredients 
by  the  two  sheep  than  are  desirable.  Thus,  there  are  extremes  of  from 
75.41  to  89.32  per  cent,  in  case  of  the  dry  matter;  67.20  to  83.63  per  cent. 
in  case  of  the  protein;  and  still  wider  variations  in  the  fiber. 

The  coefficients  for  the  pumpkins  minus  the  seeds  and  connecting  tissue 
are  much  higher,  and  indicate  that  if  the  seeds  had  been  removed  the 
animals  would  have  digested  practically  the  entire  fruit. 

Careful  observations  failed  to  note  any  whole  seeds  or  large  portions 
of  seeds  in  the  fseces.  It  seems  evident  that  in  case  of  sheep  No.  1  the 
pumpkins  must  have  exerted  a  favorable  influence  on  the  digestibility  of 
the  hay. 

Zaitschek  carried  out  digestion  experiments  on  the  Giant  pumpkin  with 
two  steers,  feeding  a  combination  of  hay  and  pumpkins.  His  results  are 
tabulated  below  in  addition  to  our  own  for  comparison. 


Source. 

Z  o 

P 

Is 

O 

J3 
< 

-a  o 

o 

.S 

'a 
o  o 

J 

s 

II 

Is 

o  3 
q 

>> 

Massachusetts  Station  (2  sheep),  . 
Zaitschek  (2  steers). 

8 
2 

80.7 
81.4 

82.3 

65.4 
72.6 

76.6 
70.3 

_ 

63.7 

61.0 
67.5 

88.7 
89.4 

91.6 
90.1 

68.7 

80.1 

In  spite  of  the  variations  in  results  secured  at  this  station  with  sheep, 
our  average  results  agree  surprisingly  well  with  those  secured  by  Zaitschek. 

Applying  the  digestion  coefficients  to  the  composition  of  the  pumpkin 
in  its  natural  state,  we  have  the  following  digestible  organic  nutrients 
in  2,000  pounds:  — 


COMPOSITION,   ETC.,   OF   PUMPKINS. 


65 


f2> 


6i 


lO        lO        CO 


(M        rt        IN        N 


00       oa       OO 


S      N      S      S 


:a     -a 


03       3 


66  MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    174. 

The  above  data  indicate  that  on  the  basis  of  substantially  the  same 
water  content,  2,000  pounds  of  pumpkins  contain  some  9  pounds  more  of 
digestible  crude  protein,  16  pounds  more  of  digestible  fiber,  43  pounds  less 
digestible  extract  matter,  and  some  27  pounds  more  digestible  fat  than  are 
contained  in  a  like  amount  of  mangels.  Mangels,  then,  are  richer  in  car- 
bohydrate matter,  but  less  rich  in  protein  and  particularly  in  fat  than  is 
the  pumpkin.  The  pumpkin  contains  more  digestible  protein  than  the 
ruta  baga,  about  the  same  amount  of  fiber,  rather  less  carbohydrate 
matter  and  noticeably  more  fat.  On  the  basis  of  total  digestible  nutrients, 
allowing  for  the  increased  energy  value  of  the  fat,  the  two  roots  appear 
to  have  about  20  per  cent,  less  feeding  value  than  the  same  weight  of 
pumpkin.  These  figures,  of  course,  cannot  be  taken  too  literally.  It  is 
doubtful  if  the  computation  of  net  energy  values  —  because  of  the  scan- 
tiness of  the  data  —  would  throw  any  additional  light  on  the  relative 
values  of  the  several  feeds. 


FEEDING   EXPERIMENTS  WITH   PUMPKINS. 

A  number  of  experiments  are  recorded  relative  to  the  value  of  pump- 
kins as  a  feed  for  cows  and  pigs.  Hills  ^  fed  three  cows  in  three  periods  of 
fifty-four  days  each  on  hay,  silage,  a  grain  mixture  and  pumpkins.  Dur- 
ing the  first  and  third  periods  the  cows  received  the  hay,  silage  and  grain, 
and  in  the  second  period,  hay,  silage,  grain  and  pumpkins.  Two  and  one- 
half  pounds  of  pumpkins  with  90.1  per  cent,  of  water  were  substituted 
for  1  pound  of  silage,  with  apparently  like  results. 

In  a  second  experiment  with  four  cows,  feeding  pumpkins  in  the  second 
of  three  periods  at  the  rate  of  40  pounds  per  cow  daily,  he  concluded  that 
6^  pounds  of  pumpkins  with  87.9  per  cent,  water  were  equal  to  1  pound 
of  hay. 

French  ^  fed  six  Berkshire  pigs  that  were  eight  months  of  age  on  a  ration 
of  wheat  shorts  and  field  pumpkins  (cooked)  with  the  seeds  removed. 
The  experiment  covered  five  periods  of  eighty-four  days  each,  and  in  the 
last  two  periods  the  pigs  consumed  an  average  each  of  26  pounds  of  pump- 
kins per  day.  The  average  daily  gain  in  live  weight  was  1.5  pounds,  and 
the  results  were  considered  quite  satisfactory. 

Burkett '  fed  several  lots  of  three  pigs  on  combinations  of  skim  milk, 
corn  meal  and  pumpkins  cooked  and  uncooked;  also  on  milk  and  raw 
pumpkins  versus  milk  and  corn  meal;  and  on  milk,  pumpkins  and  apples, 
half  and  half,  cooked,  versus  milk,  corn  meal  and  bran,  half  and  half. 
The  general  conclusion  was  that  cooking  did  not  increase  the  feeding 
value  of  pumpkins,  and  that  a  combination  of  skim  milk,  corn  meal  and 
pumpkins  gave  the  most  satisfactory  results. 

Pott  *  reports  that  in  England  pumpkins  are  quite  generally  fed  to  fat- 

»  Already  cited. 

*  Oregon  Experiment  Station,  Bui.  No.  53,  p.  22. 

*  New  Hampshire  Experiment  Station,  Bui.  No.  66. 

*  Handbuch  der  tierischen  Ernahrung,  etc.,  II.  Band,  pp.  424,  425. 


COMPOSITION,   ETC.,   OF   PUMPKINS. 


67 


tening  pigs,  together  with  ground  barley  and  beans;  also  to  milch  cows 
at  the  rate  of  25  to  over  100  pounds  daily,  cut  fine  and  mixed  with  cut 
straw;  and  to  fattening  cattle  as  high  as  100  pounds  daily,  preferably 
cooked.  Pumpkins  are  also  fed  in  Austria  to  cows,  fattening  cattle,  pigs 
and  horses.  Pott  states  that  the  claim  made  that  the  seeds  are  injurious 
is  without  foundation. 

Feeding  Pumpkins  to  Milch  Cows  at  this  Station. 

In  order  to  observe  the  effect  of  pumpkins  upon  the  quantity  and 
quality  of  milk  and  on  the  general  condition  of  the  animals,  two  grade 
Jersey  cows  were  selected  and  fed  with  30  pounds  each  of  pumpkins  daily, 
in  addition  to  hay  and  grain.    The  data  and  plan  are  as  follows :  — 

History  of  Cows. 


Name. 

Breed. 

Age 
(Years). 

Last  Calf 
dropped. 

Approx- 
imate 
Milk 
Yield 

(Pounds). 

Fat  (Per 
Cent.). 

Weight 
of  Cows 
(Pounds). 

Samantha, 
Red  III.. 

Grade  Jersey. 
Grade  Jersey. 

11 

9 

August  25 
August  11 

36.7 
23.5 

4.1 
3.9 

950 
910 

Plan  and  Duration  of  Experiment. 

The  two  cows  were  fed  in  three  distinct  periods  of  twenty-one  days 
each,  exclusive  of  the  preliminary  periods.  In  the  first  period  they  each 
received  a  ration  of  hay,  bran  and  cottonseed  meal  and  hominy  meal; 
in  the  second  period  the  same  ration,  excepting  that  5  pounds  of  the  hay 
were  replaced  by  30  pounds  of  the  pumpkins;  in  the  third  period  the 
ration  fed  was  the  same  as  in  the  first  period.  The  results  secured  in  the 
first  and  third  periods  were  averaged  and  compared  with  those  secured 
in  the  second.  Five  pounds  of  hay  were  therefore  compared  with  30 
pounds  of  pumpkins. 

Care  of  Animals.  —  The  animals  were  well  cared  for  and  turned  into 
a  barnyard  about  eight  to  nine  hours  each  day.  They  were  fed  twice 
daily;  the  hay  was  given  sometime  before  milking  and  the  grain  just 
before  milking,  while  in  the  morning  the  grain  was  given  just  before,  and 
the  hay  just  after,  milking.  Water  was  supplied  constantly  by  aid  of  a 
self -watering  device. 

Character  of  Feeds.  —  The  hay  and  grains  were  of  the  usual  good  qual- 
ity. The  pumpkins  were  grown  by  one  farmer  and  were  the  ordinary 
yellow  field  variety  of  different  sizes.    Most  of  them  were  ripe. 

Sampling  Feeds  and  Milk.  —  The  hay  was  sampled  at  the  beginning  and 
end  of  each  period  by  taking  forkfuls  of  the  daily  weighing,  running  the 


68         MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    174. 

same  through  a  power  cutter,  subsampling  and  placing  the  laboratory- 
samples  in  large  glass-stoppered  bottles  with  proper  markings.  The  grains 
were  sampled  daily  by  placing  definite  amounts  in  glass-stoppered  bottles, 
and  these  bottles  properly  labeled  were  brought  to  the  laboratory  at  the 
end  of  each  period. 

The  pumpkins  were  cut  into  small  pieces  before  being  fed. 

The  analytical  data  serving  for  the  digestion  experiment  also  served 
for  this  experiment. 

Analysis  of  the  Milk.  —  The  milk  of  each  cow  was  sampled  daily  for 
five  consecutive  days  of  the  last  two  weeks  of  each  period,  the  samples 
preserved  with  formahn,  and  the  five-day  composite  sample  tested  for 
sohds  and  fat. 

Weighing  the  Animals.  —  The  animals  were  weighed  for  tM^o  consecu- 
tive days  at  the  beginnmg  and  end  of  each  half  of  the  period  before  the 
afternoon  feeding. 

Analysis  of  Feedstuffs. 


Water. 


Ash. 


Protein. 


Fiber. 


Extract 
Matter. 


Fat. 


Hay,    . 
Bran,  . 

Cottonseed  meal, 
Hominy  meal,  . 
Pumpkins,  . 


11.34 
12.45 
8.81 
11.24 
84.77 


5.16 
6.47 
6.37 
2.05 
1.14 


5.14 
15.73 
41.63 
10.41 

2.50 


31.03 
10.27 
10.19 
4.48 
2.10 


45.57 
50.68 
25.91 
64.67 

7.77 


1.76 
4.40 
7.09 
7.15 
1.72 


Total  Feed  consumed  (Pounds). 
Average,  Periods  I.  and  III. 


Name. 

Hay. 

Bran. 

Cotton- 
seed Meal. 

Hominy 
Meal. 

Pump- 
kins. 

Red  III.. 

Samantha, 

378 
504 

63 

84 

42 
63 

42 
84 

- 

Period  II. 

Red  III., 

Samantha, 

273 
399 

63 

84 

42                    42 
63                    84 

630 
630 

COMPOSITION,   ETC.,   OF   PUMPKINS. 


69 


Daily  Feeds  consumed  (Pounds). 
Hay  -\-Grain  (Periods  I.  and  III.). 


Name. 

Hay. 

Bran. 

Cotton- 
seed Meal. 

Hominy 
Meal. 

Pump- 
kins. 

Red  III., 

Samantha 

18 
24 

3 
4 

2 
3 

2 
4 

- 

Hay+Grain+Pumpkins  (Period  II.). 

Red  III.. 

Samantha 

13 
19 

3 
4 

2 
3 

2 
4 

30 
30 

Estimated  Digestible  Nutrients  in  Daily  Rations. 
Hay-\-Grain  (Periods  I.  and  III.). 


Name. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Extract 
Matter. 

Fat. 

Total. 

Nutritive 
Ratio. 

Red  III 

Samantha 

1.73 
2.51 

3.60 
4.86 

7.63 
11.03 

.53 
.83 

13.49 
19.23 

1:7.2 
1:7.1 

Average,        .... 

2.12 

4.23 

9.33 

.68 

16.36 

- 

Hay  -\-Grain  +  Pumpkins 

(Period  II.). 

Red  III.,     . 

Samantha,  . 

2.16 
2.95 

3.05 
4.31 

8.31 
11.71 

.97 
1.27 

14.49 
20.24 

1:6.2 
1:6.4 

Average, 

2.55 

3.68 

10.01 

1.12 

'    17.36 

- 

The  above  nutrients  were  estimated  on  the  basis  of  actual  analysis  and 
the  appUcation  of  average  digestion  coefficients.  The  30  pounds  of  pump- 
kins fed  contained  1  pound  more  digestible  nutrients  than  5  pounds  of 
hay.  This  was  due  to  the  fact  that  the  pumpkins  had  rather  less  water 
than  was  expected,  and  that  they  contained  such  a  high  percentage  of 
digestible  matter.  On  the  basis  of  digestible  matter,  1  pound  of  hay  is 
equivalent  to  some  4|  pounds  of  pumpkins. 


70         MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    174. 


Weights  of  the  Animals  (Pounds). 


Red  III. 

Samantha. 

Period, 

I. 

III. 

II. 

I. 

III. 

U. 

Be^nning,           .... 
End 

915 
948 

930 
930 

905 

928 

1,095 
1,140 

1,153 
1,148 

1.095 
1,118 

Gain  or  loss, 

+33 

± 

+  23 
+  23 

+45              —5 

+23 

Average 

+  17 

+  20 

+23 

Gain  or  Loss  for  Both  Cows. 


Periods  I.  and  III.  (hay+grain)  =  37  pounds+. 
Period  II.  (hay+grain+pumpkins)  =  46  pounds+. 


There  seems  to  have  been  very  little  difference  in  the  changes  in  weight 
as  a  result  of  feeding  the  two  rations. 


Total  Yield  of  Milk  Products. 

Hay  -{-Grain  {Period  I.). 


Name  of  Cow. 

Total 

Milk 

(Pounds. 

Daily 
Milk 

(Aver- 
age). 

Total 

Solids 

(Pounds). 

Total 

Fat 

(Pounds). 

Average 

Per  Cent. 

Total 

Solids. 

Average 

Per  Cent. 

Fat. 

Red  III 

Samantha, 

364.4 
532.1 

17.4 
25.3 

47.88 
76.73 

17.49 
29.11 

13.14 
14.42 

4.80 
5.47 

Hay+Grain  (Period  III.). 

Red  III., 

Samantha 

301.6 
460.0 

14.4 
21.9 

42.07 
69.18 

16.47 
26.40 

13.95 
15.04 

5.46 
5.74 

Hay  ■\-Grain+ Pumpkins  {Period  II.). 

Red  III 

Samantha 

341.7 
495.3 

16.3 
23.6 

48.15 

76.08 

19.24 

29.87 

14.09 
15.36 

5.63 

6.03 

COMPOSITION,   ETC.,   OF   PUMPKINS. 


71 


Total  Yield  of  Milk  Products  —  Concluded. 

Hay  -\-Grain  {Average,  Periods  I.  and  III.). 


X.iME    OF   Cow. 

Total 

Milk 

(Pounds). 

Daily 
Milk 

(Aver- 
age). 

Total 

Solids 

(Pounds). 

Total 

Fat 

(Pounds). 

Average 

Per 

Cent. 

Total 

Solids. 

Average 

Per 

Cent. 

Fat. 

Average 
Per 

Cent. 

Solids 
not  Fat. 

Red  III., 

Samantha, 

333.0 
496.1 

15.9 
23.6 

45.09 
73.08 

17.08 

27.83 

13.54 
14.73 

5.13 
5.61 

8.41 
9.12 

Average,    . 

414.6 

19.7 

59.09 

22.46 

14.25 

5.42 

8.83 

Hay-\-Grain-\-Pumpkins  {Period  II.). 

Red  III 

Samantha, 

341.7 
495.3 

16.3 
23.6 

48.15 
76.08 

19.24 

29.87 

14.09 
15.36 

5.63 
6.03 

8.46 
9.33 

Average,    . 

418.5 

19.9 

62.12 

24.56 

14.84 

5.87 

8.97 

The  yield  of  milk  was  substantially  the  same  on  each  ration.  The  total 
solids  showed  an  increase  as  a  result  of  feeding  the  pumpkins,  and  this 
was  due  evidently  to  an  increase  in  the  percentage  of  fat  in  the  milk. 
Attention  has  been  called  to  the  fact  that  the  pumpkin  seeds  are  rich  in 
fat.  By  referring  to  the  average  daily  rations  consumed  (page  69)  it  may 
be  seen  that  the  ration  without  pumpkins  contained  .68  pound  daily  of 
digestible  crude  fat,  and  with  the  pumpkins  1.12  pounds,  the  excess  of  .44 
pound  of  pure  fat  being  derived  from  the  pumpkin  seeds.  This  additional 
food  fat  evidently  temporarily  increased  the  fat  in  the  milk. 

In  so  far  as  the  results  of  a  single  experiment  with  two  cows  are  concerned 
it  appears  that  6  pounds  of  pumpkins  fuUy  replaced  1  pound  of  hay.  On 
the  basis  of  digestible  nutrients  our  calculations  show  that  4|  pounds 
of  pumpkins  with  84.8  per  cent,  of  water  replaced  1  pound  of  hay  with 
11.34  per  cent,  of  water.  It  is  quite  possible  that  25  pounds  of  pump- 
kins would  have  replaced  5  pounds  of  hay  with  equal  results.  Because  of 
the  rather  wide  variations  in  the  moisture  content  of  the  fruit,  one  could 
say  only  on  the  basis  of  results  secured,  that  from  5  to  6  pounds  of  pump- 
kins were  equivalent  to  1  pound  of  first-class  cow  hay. 


BULLETI]^   l^o.    175. 


DEPARTMENT   OF   BOTANY. 


MOSAIC   DISEASE   OF   TOBACCO.^ 


BY  G.   H.    CHAPMAN. 


Introduction. 


The  observations  and  conclusions  reported  in  the  following  pages  are 
the  results  of  several  years  of  more  or  less  continuous  investigation  on 
the  part  of  the  writer,  and  deal  with  the  probable  causes,  occurrence, 
appearance  and  methods  of  control  of  this  well-known  disease  of  tobacco 
and  related  plants.  Enough  has  been  accomplished  so  that  it  is  believed 
wise  to  add  still  another  paper  to  the  already  long  list  of  literature  which 
has  been  pubUshed  on  this  disease.  During  the  time  in  which  these 
experiments  have  been  in  progress  much  new  literature  has  appeared 
dealing  with  this  subject,  some  of  which  has  helped  the  writer  by  verifying 
his  results  and  by  bringing  out  new  facts  concerning  the  disease;  but,  on 
the  other  hand,  some  of  the  work  appears  to  have  been  done  in  a  hasty 
manner,  and  possibly  erroneous  conclusions  drawn  in  some  cases,  thus 
adding  to  the  large  amount  of  confusing  subject-matter  which  has  to  do 
with  this  disease.  The  experiments  carried  on  by  the  writer  were  begun 
in  a  general  way  in  1907,  and  have  been  repeated  several  times  during  the 
years  subsequent  to  that  date,  new  lines  of  investigation  both  in  the 
field  and  laboratory  having  been  added  as  occasion  demanded.  Some 
considerable  time  has  been  spent  in  verifjdng  the  results  obtained  by  other 
recent  investigators,  and  an  attempt  has  been  made  to  gather  together  in 
a  broad,  general  way,  as  well  as  in  detail,  aU  the  reliable  information 
possible  about  this  interesting  disease,  as  well  as  to  bring  out  new  facts  in 
regard  to  it.  More  attention  has  been  given  to  the  biochemical  aspects 
of  the  problem  than  has  heretofore  been  done  by  investigators. 

>  Also  presented  in  part  to  the  faculty  of  the  graduate  school  of  the  Massachusetts  Agricultural 
College,  June,  1916,  as  a  major  thesis  in  partial  fulfillment  of  the  requirements  for  the  degree  of 
doctor  of  philosophy. 


74  MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    175. 


Historical  Summary. 

In  the  following  paragraphs  is  given  a  brief  r^sum^  of  the  more  important 
work  done  on  the  mosaic  disease  of  tobacco  up  to  the  present  time,  and 
as  an  excellent  critical  review  of  the  literature,  etc.,  up  to  1902  is  given  by 
A.  F.  Woods  1  in  his  work  on  the  subject,  the  same  is  quoted  in  full  below. 
He  states :  — 

Adolph  Mayer  ^  was  the  first  to  make  a  careful  study  of  the  trouble.  He  demon- 
strated that  it  could  not  be  caused  by  an  insuflfieient  supply  of  mineral  nutrients. 
He  found  as  much  nitrogen,  potassium  salts,  phosphates,  calcium  and  magnesium 
present  in  the  soils  and  plants  where  the  disease  occurred  as  in  the  soils  where  the 
disease  did  not  occur.  He  also  found  that  the  trouble  was  apparently  distributed 
over  the  field  without  regard  to  the  soil  conditions. 

Since  tobacco  requires  much  lime,  liming  the  soil  was  tried,  but  the  disease  was 
not  prevented  thereby.  Mayer  further  kept  hotbeds  in  some  cases  rather  moist, 
in  others  dry,  and  then  again,  richly  or  poorly  manured  with  nitrogen;  but  in  no 
case  could  he  determine  that  the  conditions  in  question  caused  the  disease.  He 
also  found  that  variations  in  the  temperature  of  the  hotbeds  apparently  had  no 
effect;  neither  did  crowding,  which  produced  partial  etiolation,  appear  to  have 
any  effect  on  the  disease.  Seeds  from  flowers  in  which  self-fertilization  was  pre- 
vented he  found  to  be  just  as  susceptible  to  the  disease  as  seeds  produced  without 
such  precautions,  but  on  the  soil  on  which  the  disease  had  once  appeared  it  was 
again  produced.  According  to  his  observation,  also,  the  trouble  was  not  often 
found  on  soil  used  for  the  first  time  for  tobacco.  He  further  proved  that  the 
juice  of  the  diseased  leaves  injected  with  the  juice  of  healthy  plants  did  not  develop 
the  disease.  He  was  not  able  to  produce  it  by  injecting  diseased  juice  into  other 
solanaceous  plants.  Where  the  diseased  juice  was  injected  into  tobacco  the  same 
trouble  developed  in  from  ten  to  eleven  days.  Heating  to  60°  C.  did  not  destroy 
the  infectious  substance;   at  65°  to  75°  it  was  attenuated,  and  at  80°  it  was  killed. 

After  Mayer  had  shown  the  absence  of  animal  and  fungous  parasites  he  sup- 
posed bacteria  to  be  the  cause  of  the  disease,  but  all  his  efforts  with  bacteria  cul- 
tivated from  the  surface  of  diseased  leaves,  and  also  with  different  mixtures  of 
bacteria,  failed  to  produce  it.  Nevertheless,  he  thought  that  there  must  be  certain 
pathogenic  bacteria  present  in  those  soils  in  which  the  disease  appeared,  and 
therefore  proposed  to  change  the  soil  in  the  hotbeds  and  to  devote  the  fields  where 
tobacco  had  been  cultivated  to  other  crops.  He  also  recommended  the  use  of 
mineral  rather  than  organic  manures. 

These  general  results  were  confirmed  by  several  subsequent  investigators.  Not, 
however,  till  Beijerinck'  took  hold  of  the  question  was  much  of  importance  added 
to  our  knowledge  of  the  malady.  He  proved  the  absence  of  bacteria  in  the  devel- 
opment of  the  disease.  He  showed  that  the  juice  of  the  plant  filtered  through 
Chamberland  filters,  while  remaining  perfectly  clear  and  free  from  bacteria,  still 
retained  the  power  of  infection.  A  small  drop  of  it  injected  hypodermically  into 
the  growing  bud  was  sufficient  to  give  the  plant  the  disease.  He  found  that  only 
dividing  (meristematic)  cells  can  become  diseased.  Diseased  tissue  kept  its  in- 
fectious qualities  even  after  drying,  and  retained  its  injurious  properties  in  the 

'  Woods,  A.  F.:  Observations  on  the  Mosaic  Disease  of  Tobacco.  U.  S.  D.  A.,  Bur.  Plant  Ind. , 
Bui.  No.  18  (1902). 

2  Mayer,  Adolph:  Uber  die  Mosaikkrankheit  des  Tabaks.  Landw.  Versuchsstation,  32: 
451-467  (1886).    Review  of  the  same  article  in  Journ.  of  Mycology,  7:  332-385  (1894). 

»  Beijerinck,  M.  W.:  Verhandelingcn  der  Koninklijke  Akademie  van  Wetenschappen  te 
Amsterdam.    Deel  6:  No.  5.    See  also  Centb.  f.  Bakt.,  Par.,  etc.,  II:  5:  27-33  (1899). 


MOSAIC   DISEASE    OF   TOBACCO.  75 

soil  during  the  winter.  Weak  solutions  of  formalin  did  not  kill  the  virus,  but 
heating  to  boiling  point  did.  Fresh,  unfiltered  juice  was  more  effective  than  an 
equal  amount  of  filtered  juice.  He  found  that  soil  around  diseased  plants  may 
infect  the  roots  of  healthy  plants,  but  he  did  not  determine  whether  direct  trans- 
ference is  possible  through  healthy  root  surfaces,  or  whether  insects,  by  injuring 
the  roots,  favored  infection.  He  defines  the  milder  form  of  the  disease  as  a  suffer- 
ing of  the  chlorophyll  bodies.  Later  a  general  disease  of  the  plasmatic  contents  of 
the  cells  sets  in. 

In  field  conditions  as  a  final  stage  the  swollen  green  areas  become  marked  with 
small  dead  spots,  but  these  did  not  appear  on  plants  grown  under  glass.  Under 
certain  conditions  he  observed  that  plants  apparently  recover  from  the  disease; 
i.e.,  the  new  growth  appeared  to  recover.  He  found  that  the  infective  material, 
whatever  it  might  be,  could  be  transported  through  considerable  distances  in  the 
plant,  but  could  cause  the  disease  only  in  the  dividing  cells.  He  assumed  the 
virus  to  be  a  non-corpuscular,  fluid-like  material,  which  had  the  power  of  growth 
when  in  contact,  in  a  sort  of  symbiotic  way,  with  the  growing  cells,  —  "a  living 
fluid  contagium." 

Shortly  after  Beijerinck's  paper,  Sturgis  ^  published  a  critical  review  of  the  work 
done  on  the  disease  up  to  that  time,  with  numerous  valuable  results  and  observa- 
tions made  in  Connecticut,  where  the  trouble  is  known  as  "calico"  or  "mottled 
top." 

The  results  obtained  by  Sturgis  and  observations  made  by  him  on 
tobacco  in  Connecticut  bore  out  the  statements  of  other  careful  and 
critical  workers,  and  greatly  cleared  up  the  field  for  further  investigation. 
He  came  to  the  conclusion  that  on  close,  clayey  soils  the  disease  may  be 
more  abundant  than  on  an  open,  porous  soil.  The  disease  is  not  conta- 
gious, but  he  could  not  state  definitely  as  to  its  infectiousness;  it  is  not 
caused  by  fungi,  nematodes  or  parasitic  insects,  and  the  facts  observed 
by  him  were  not  favorable  to  the  theory  of  bacterial  origin.  He  also 
came  to  the  conclusion  that  the  disease  is  not  inherent  in  the  seed,  and 
looked  upon  it  as  a  purely  physiological  trouble  brought  about  by  sudden 
interruptions  of  the  normal  plant  metabohsm.  Koning,  ^  in  his  work, 
verified  much  of  the  work  of  Beijerinck  and  Mayer,  and  Woods'  later 
verified  the  work  of  these  investigators  and  pointed  out  that  in  the 
diseased  leaves  there  was  an  excess  or  excessive  activity  on  the  part  of 
an  enzyme  belonging  to  the  oxidases,  and  that  the  power  of  oxidation  in 
the  cells  was  inversely  proportional  to  the  amount  of  chlorophyll  present, 
using  the  color  as  a  basis  of  comparison.  He  also  pointed  out  that  there 
was  a  marked  structural  difference  between  the  cells  of  the  dark  green 
and  light  green  areas,  and  proved  to  his  own  satisfaction  that  the  light 
green  areas  are  the  truly  diseased  portions,  a  fact  that  will  be  referred  to 
later  in  this  paper.  In  a  later  careful  investigation  of  the  disease  Woods  * 
arrived  at  the  following  conclusions,  which  were  a  great  stride  forward  in 
our  understanding  of  some  phases  of  this  baffling  disease.    He  states :  — • 

»  sturgis,  W.  A.:   Mosaic  Disease  of  Tobacco.    Conn.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  Rept.,  250-254  (1898). 
2  Koning,  C.  J.:    Die  Flecken  oder  Mosaikkrankheit  des  hollandischen  Tabaks.     Zeitschrift 
fur  Pflanzenkr.,  9:  65-80. 

'  Woods,  A.  F.:   Inhibiting  Action  of  Oxidase  on  Diastase.    Science,  n.  s..  No.  262,  17-19. 
«  Woods,  A.  F.,  loc.  cit. 


76         MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    175. 

The  disease  is  not  due  to  parasites  of  any  kind,  but  is  the  result  of  defective 
nutrition  of  the  young  di\ading  and  rapidly  growing  cells,  due  to  a  lack  of  elabo- 
rated nitrogenous  reserve  food  accompanied  by  an  abnormal  increase  in  the 
activity  of  oxidizing  enzymes  in  the  diseased  cells.  The  unusual  activity  of  the 
enzyme  prevents  the  proper  elaboration  of  the  reserve  food,  so  that  a  plant  once 
diseased  seldom  recovers.  On  the  decay  of  the  roots,  leaves  and  stems  of  both 
healthy  and  diseased  plants,  the  enzyme  in  question  is  liberated  and  remains  active 
in  the  soil.  The  enzyme  is  very  soluble  in  water  and  appears  to  pass  readily 
through  plant  membranes.  If  the  young  plants  take  it  up  in  sufficient  quantity 
to  reach  the  terminal  bud,  they  become  diseased  in  the  characteristic  way.  Under 
field  conditions  there  is  little  danger  from  infection  in  this  manner,  but  in  the 
seed  bed  the  danger  is  much  greater  on  account  of  the  greater  susceptibility  of  the 
young  plants  to  the  disease,  and  the  greater  amount  of  free  oxidizing  enzymes 
likely  to  be  in  the  soil  due  to  the  decay  of  the  roots  and  plants.  New  or  steam 
sterilized  soil  should  therefore  be  used  for  the  seed  bed. 

I  have  shown  that  transplanting,  especially  when  the  roots  are  injured,  may 
produce  the  disease.  Great  care  must,  therefore,  be  taken  not  to  injure  the  roots  in 
this  process  or  in  the  subsequent  cultivation,  or  to  check  the  growth  of  the  plants. 

There  is  evidence  that  rapid  growth,  caused  by  too  much  nitrogenous  maniu-e  or 
too  high  a  temperature,  is  favorable  to  the  disease.  Why  this  should  be  the  case 
has  not  been  determined.  It  is  probably  connected  with  the  manufacture  of 
reserve  nitrogen  by  the  cells  and  its  distribution  to  the  rapidly  growing  parts. 

Plants  grown  under  such  conditions  are  less  able  to  stand  successfully  marked 
variations  in  temperature  and  moister  conditions  of  soil  and  atmosphere.  Varia- 
tions of  this  kind  favor  the  development  of  the  disease  in  the  less  resistant  plants. 

Close,  clayey  soils,  packing  hard  after  rains  and  requiring  constant  tillage,  are 
not  favorable  to  the  even  growth  of  either  the  tops  or  roots  of  tobacco  plants.  In 
moist,  cloudy  weather  the  plants  will  grow  too  fast,  and  in  hot,  dry  weather  the 
soil  is  likely  to  bake,  checking  growth  and  making  probable  injury  to  the  roots  in 
cultivation.  Such  soils  are  very  favorable  to  the  development  of  the  mosaic 
disease,  as  pointed  out  by  Thaxter.  i  He  found  that  loosening  the  soil  by  liming 
and  giving  partial  shade,  thus  causing  a  more  even  condition  of  growth,  very 
greatly  reduced  the  disease. 

Crops  grown  under  cheesecloth  covers  protected  at  the  side  are  said  to  be  re- 
markably free  from  the  disease.  The  plants  make  a  steady  rapid  growth,  much 
greater  than  in  ordinary  field  culture.  .  .  . 

The  disease  is  not,  so  far  as  observed,  produced  by  a  lack  of  soil  nutrients,  though 
from  its  nature  we  would  expect  that  a  deficiency  of  nitrogen,  phosphoric  acid, 
lime  and  magnesia  might  favor  its  development.  Koning^  says  that  manuring 
with  kainit  and  Thomas  slag  diminishes  the  extent  of  the  disease.  Mayer,  Beijer- 
inck  and  other  investigators,  however,  agree  that  the  trouble  is  not  caused  by  the 
lack  of  any  soil  nutrients.  It  appears,  so  far  as  my  own  investigations  go,  that  the 
trouble  cannot  be  cured  by  giving  the  plants  additional  food  of  any  kind.  Over- 
feeding with  nitrogen  favors  the  development  of  the  disease,  and  there  is  some 
evidence  that  excess  of  nitrates  in  the  cells  may  cause  an  excessive  development 
of  the  ferments  that  cause  the  disease.  Very  slight  attacks  of  the  disease  known 
as  "mottled  top"  are  said  not  to  injure  the  quality  of  the  leaf  to  a  sufficient  extent 
to  be  noticeable  commercially,  though  they  may  be  less  elastic  and  have  a  poorer 
burn  and  aroma  than  healthy  leaves. 

Hunger,  ^  in  his  work  on  the  mosaic  of  Deli  tobacco,  verified  much  of 
the  work  of  previous  investigators,  and  later,  in  carefully  planned  and 

»  Thaxter:  Conn.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  Rept.,  Ill,  253  (1899). 
*  Koning,  C.  J.,  loc.  cit. 

»  Hunger,  F.  W.  T.:  De  Mozaiek-ziekte  bij  deli  Tabak.  Med.  s'Lands  Plantentium,  Batavaia. 
Deel  1:  63  (1903). 


MOSAIC   DISEASE   OF   TOBACCO.  77 

executed  experiments,^  proved  that  the  disease  was  not  contagious  but 
was  highly  infectious.  He  believed  that  it  could  be  carried  from  diseased 
to  healthy  leaves  simply  by  touching,  especially  in  the  case  of  the  young 
leaves,  a  fact  that  makes  it  necessary  for  the  workman  to  use  great  care 
when  looking  for  the  tobacco  bud  worms,  etc.,  in  the  buds.  He  was  of 
the  opinion  that  a  rupture  of  the  leaf  was  not  necessary  to  induce  the 
mosaic  disease  in  plants. 

Selby  2  a  year  later  showed  this  to  be  apparently  true  for  tobacco  grown 
in  Ohio,  and  Hunger's  statements  were  in  his  opinion  in  all  respects  con- 
firmed. He  also  reported  that  "Blossoms  of  various  plants  were  inocu- 
lated through  the  nectar  by  transmission  of  nectar  from  diseased  plants, 
as  by  insect  visitation.  A  slender  brush  of  horse  hair  was  used  for  this 
purpose.  No  evidences  of  the  disease  were  observed  as  a  result  of  this 
method." 

CUnton'  was  able  to  produce  the  trouble  on  tomatoes  by  inoculating 
with  juice  from  a  diseased  tobacco  plant  and  from  the  tomato  so  infected 
was  able  to  reproduce  the  disease  on  the  tobacco  again  by  inoculation 
from  the  tomato,  again  showing  the  infectious  nature  of  the  disease,  and 
that  the  troubles  on  the  tomato  and  tobacco  were  practically  identical. 
This  has  been  repeatedly  verified  by  the  writer  and  many  other  investi- 
gators. 

Jensen,*  in  his  work  on  the  disease,  came  to  the  conclusion  that  the 
right  way  to  get  at  the  methods  of  control  of  the  disease  was  by  experi- 
mentation to  obtain  a  resistant  strain  of  tobacco,  no  matter  what  the 
cause  of  the  disease  might  be,  and  he  carried  on  some  experiments  along 
these  lines.  As  yet  no  definite  results  have  been  reported  by  the  in- 
vestigators, but  the  time  has  probably  been  too  short  to  obtain  results. 

Lodewijks^  stated  that  by  subjecting  diseased  plants  to  different  col- 
ored lights  he  was  able  to  bring  about  a  cure  in  some  cases.    He  states:  — 

The  mosaic  disease  cannot  be  diminished  or  prevented  by  lessened  light  intensity. 
Neither  diffused  nor  colored  light  has  any  effect  on  the  disease  if  the  healthy  leaves 
are  not  able  to  function  in  normal  daylight.  Under  the  latter  condition,  however, 
diffused  light  exerts  a  retardation,  red  light  diminishes  the  trouble,  and  blue  light 
effects  a  cure.  All  the  results  may  then  be  explained  by  the  hypothesis  that  the 
virus  formation  diminishes  with  the  intensity  of  the  light,  while  in  the  healthy 
leaves,  through  the  action  of  the  virus,  an  anti-virus  is  formed,  the  action  of  which 
destroys  the  virus  (immunity  and  antitoxin  formation  in  the  case  of  animals).  .  . . 

Normally  in  the  metabolism  of  the  tobacco  plant  a  substance  is  formed,  the 
action  of  which  is  opposed  to  that  of  the  equally  normally  occurring  virus  of  mosaic 
disease,  perhaps  because  it  binds  itself  chemically  to  the  latter. 

•  Hunger,  F.  W.  T.:  Die  Verbreitung  der  Mosaikkrankheit  infolge  der  Behandlung  des  Tabaks. 
Centralbl.  f.  Bakt.  Par.,  etc.,  II:  11:  405-408  (1908). 

2  Selby.  A.  D.:  Tobacco  Disease.    Ohio  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  Bui.  No.  15,  88-95  (1904). 

•  Clinton,  G.  P.:  Notes  on  Fungous  Diseases,  etc.  Conn.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  Rept.,  1907-08,  857- 
858. 

•  Jensen,  H.:  Uber  die  Bekampfung  der  Mosaikkrankheit  der  Tabakpflanze.  Centralbl.  f. 
Bakt.  Par.,  etc.,  II:  15:  440^45  (1906). 

5  Lodewijka,  T.  A.,  Jr.:  Zur  Mosaikkrankheit  des  Tabaks.  Rec.  Trav.  bot.  Neerlandais, 
VII.  (1910). 


78         MASS.   EXPERIMENT    STATION   BULLETIN    175. 

Both  substances,  virus  and  anti-virus,  may  be  increased  by  external  factors  or 
conditions.  In  the  first  instance  the  plants  become  diseased  with  the  mosaic 
disease;  in  the  latter  an  immunity  against  the  disease  is  brought  about.  Decrease 
in  intensity  and  cure  occur  if  the  virus  formation  ceases  or  stops,  while  at  the  same 
time  the  formation  of  an  anti- virus  is  taking  place  normally  or  is  increased.  ^ 

A  discussion  of  Lodewijks'  work  is  to  be  found  later  in  this  paper. 

Allard^  in  a  recent  work  on  the  disease  states  that  from  the  results  of 
his  experiments  he  is  of  the  opinion  that  the  trouble  is  not  primarily 
ph3''siological  but  is  parasitic  in  nature,  but  he  is  unable  to  throw  any 
light  on  the  nature  of  the  parasite,  and  in  spite  of  the  conclusions  drawn  by 
him,  none  of  his  results,  at  least  in  so  far  as  the  writer  is  able  to  judge,  has 
in  any  way  weakened  the  theory  that  the  trouble  may  be  physiological  in 
nature;  and  some  of  his  results,  from  the  writer's  point  of  view,  seem  to 
substantiate  this  idea  of  a  physiological  agency.  Two  points  of  great 
interest  are  brought  out  by  him,  viz.,  the  mosaic  as  affecting  the  color 
of  the  corolla  by  blotching,  etc.,  and  the  carrying  of  the  disease  by  certain 
aphids.  These  points  have  not  been  noted  before.  In  the  following 
pages  some  of  his  work  mU  be  taken  up  in  detail  in  so  far  as  it  seems  to 
bear  out  or  refute  work  done  by  the  writer. 

It  may  be  seen  from  the  foregoing  r^sum^  that  the  theory  that  the  disease 
is  physiological  in  character  has  been  in  the  past  pretty  generally  accepted,, 
but  the  identification  of  the  ultimate  causes  producing  the  symptoms 
varies  widely  with  the  different  investigators.  The  writer's  conclusions- 
with  regard  to  this  point  are  taken  up  later  in  this  paper. 

Names. 

By  right  of  priority  the  term  "mosaic"  is  the  one  which  should  be 
applied  to  this  disease.  It  has,  however,  many  local  names,  and  these 
sometimes  are  applied  differently  to  the  different  manifestations  of  the 
sjTnptoms;  among  them  may  be  mentioned  the  following:  "calico," 
"brindle,"  "mongrel,"  "mottle-top,"  "string  leaf,"  "frenching,"  etc. 
Other  terms  have  also  been  used,  but  they  do  not  in  aU  cases  apply  to  the 
"mosaic"  alone,  hence  they  are  here  omitted.  The  term  "infectious 
chlorosis "  as  suggested  by  Clinton  is  perhaps  best  descriptive  of  diseases 
of  this  general  character,  with  "mosaic"  as  a  specific  type  under  this 
division,  there  being  many  other  infectious,  clilorotic  diseases  of  plants 
quite  distinct  from  the  mosaic  type. 

Description  op  the  Mosaic  Disease  of  Tobacco. 

Descriptions  of  the  mosaic  disease  of  tobacco  have  been  repeatedly 
presented,  and  the  disease  itself  is  so  well  known  that  there  is  little  need 
of  repetition  at  this  point,  but  a  brief  r^sum^  of  the  salient  characteristics 

»  Translation  from  abstract  of  Lodewijks'  paper  in  Bot.  Centralbl.,  114-518  (1910). 
'  Allard,  H.  A.:   Mosaic  Disease  of  Tobacco.    U.  S.  D.  A.,  n.  s.,  Bur.  Plant  Ind.,  Bui.  No.  40 
(1914). 


MOSAIC   DISEASE   OF   TOBACCO.  79 

of  the  disease  ■will  be  given  so  that  no  misunderstanding  may  arise,  as 
several  other  leaf  troubles  more  or  less  chlorotic  in  character  have  often 
been  confounded  with  the  true  "mosaic."  The  disease  may  show  on  the 
leaves  at  all  stages  of  the  growth,  from  the  seedling  to  the  mature  plant. 
It  is  often  difficult  in  seedlings  to  diagnose  the  trouble  definitely,  as 
the  slight  mottling  and  curl  of  the  leaves  may  be  due  to  other  factors. 
As  a  rule,  in  young  plants  the  leaf  is  rougher  and  a  permanent  mottling  is 
observed,  very  slight  in  character,  however,  and  not  to  be  confounded  with 
the  mottling  due  to  normal  metabolic  processes  which  occurs  under  certain 
conditions  of  growth.  As  the  disease  progresses,  however,  the  leaf  is 
found  to  be  divided  into  light  and  dark  green  areas;  in  mild  cases  there 
does  not  appear  to  be  any  marked  leaf  distortion,  and  the  light  green  areas 
sometimes  verge  on  the  yellow  in  color.  The  dark  green  areas  apparently 
deepen  in  color  with  the  intensity  of  the  disease,  and  in  extreme  cases  the 
leaf  is  much  distorted  and  the  dark  portions  appear  blister-like,  due  to 
their  more  rapid  growth.  The  leaves,  as  a  rule,  are  much  stiffer  and 
thicker  to  the  touch  than  are  the  normal  healthy  leaves.  Sometimes  in 
the  later  stages  of  the  disease  there  are  found  dry,  dead,  brown  patches  or 
spots  on  the  leaves,  sometimes  where  the  dark  green  areas  were  originally, 
but  more  often  the  light  green  portions  show  this  extreme  condition.  Both 
the  light  and  dark  areas  show  abnormalities  in  structure;  nevertheless, 
the  light  green  areas  are  the  more  truly  diseased  ones,  the  dark  green  areas 
presenting  different  characteristics,  and  although  showing  changes  in 
cell  arrangement,  etc.,  function  more  normally  in  many  respects.  Most 
investigators  have  held  that  the  light  green  areas  are  the  diseased  portions 
of  a  leaf,  but  some  have  been  of  the  opinion  that  the  dark  green  areas  are 
the  diseased  portions.  As  will  be  seen  from  the  writer's  experiments  the 
former  is  the  more  correct  view,  as  the  increase  in  color  intensity  and  the 
blistering  of  the  dark  green  areas  is  due  to  the  necessarily  increased  func- 
tioning thrown  on  these  portions  of  the  leaf. 

Occasionally  a  leaf  may  be  distorted  in  such  a  manner  as  to  present  the 
appearance  of  being  little  more  than  a  long  filament  consisting  principally 
of  midrib,  with  but  very  little  leaf  surface.  This  condition  has  been 
observed  by  the  writer  in  some  instances,  but  should  not  be  confounded 
with  a  similar  trouble  occurring  on  tobacco  in  certain  regions,  which  is  of 
an  unknown  character  but  which  is  not  the  true  mosaic  as  it  is  not  infec- 
tious. This  latter  trouble  has  been  noted  particularly  in  Java,  etc.,  as  is 
reported  by  Peters  ^  in  his  work  on  the  diseases  of  tobacco.  It  has  not 
been  observed  in  tobacco  fields  in  this  region  by  the  writer. 

It  is  thought  that  soil  and  moisture  conditions  are  responsible  at  least 
partially  for  this  disease. 

>  Peters,  L.:  Krankheiten  und  Beschadigung  des  Tabaks.  Mitteil.  aus  der  Kaiser.  Anstalt 
F.  Land-  u.  Forstwirtschaft.    Heft,  13:  64  (1912). 


80  MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    175. 


OCCUBRENCE. 

The  mosaic  disease  has  been  known  for  j^ears  both  in  Europe  and 
America,  and  may  be  said  to  be  present  everywhere  that  tobacco  is  grown. 
It  apparently  is  a  more  serious  disease  in  the  tropics  and  in  certain  parts 
of  Europe  than  it  is  in  this  country.  In  New  England  it  has  been  known 
for  some  time,  and,  although  present  to  a  certain  extent  each  year,  is  not 
of  such  great  economic  importance  as  in  some  other  locaUties.  In  Massa- 
chusetts it  is  found  practically  everywhere,  and  some  years  appears  to  be 
much  more  prevalent  over  widespread  areas  than  in  others.  As  a  rule, 
however,  the  disease  is  not  epidemic  in  character,  and  often  only  a  com- 
paratively few  plants  in  a  field  will  be  found  affected. 

On  certain  fields,  however,  —  and  these  most  often  are  such  as  have 
been  cropped  to  tobacco  for  many  years  without  the  practice  of  cover- 
cropping  or  rotation,  —  mosaic  disease  is  present  year  after  year,  and  a 
large  percentage  of  the  crop  is  always  badly  affected,  the  plants  beginning 
to  show  the  trouble  in  from  three  to  four  weeks  after  planting  in  the  field. 

The  prevalence  of  the  disease  in  the  field,  aside  from  the  special  cases 
above  noted,  is  apparently  related  in  some  way  to  conditions  in  the  field 
during  the  growing  season,  or  during  the  time  the  plants  are  in  the  seed 
bed.  There  is  no  question  that  a  large  percentage  of  the  infection  found 
in  the  field,  exclusive  of  that  appearing  on  the  sucker  growth  after  topping, 
or  due  to  infection  at  the  time  of  transplanting,  is  due  to  a  primary  infec- 
tion from  the  seed  bed. 

While  the  disease  as  a  rule  is  first  noticed  in  the  field  some  time  after 
transplanting,  very  often  the  seedlings  in  the  beds  are  affected.  This  is 
particularly  true  in  the  case  of  old  or  carelessly  treated  beds.  It  is  often 
very  difiicult  for  the  casual  observer  to  identify  the  disease  on  the  seedlings, 
as  the  macroscopic  or  visible  symptoms  are  eithel*  very  slight  or  lacking. 
In  this  way  many  plants  are  transplanted  to  the  field  by  workmen  without 
their  being  aware  that  they  are  diseased,  and  the  disease  becoming  more 
pronounced  in  the  later  stages  of  growth,  the  infection  is  laid  to  the  soil 
in  the  field,  when  in  reality  the  infected  soil  of  the  seed  bed  is  responsible 
and  not  the  field  soil.  As  has  been  stated,  the  closest  examination  of  the 
seedhngs  is  necessary  to  identify  the  trouble  in  the  seed  bed,  particularly 
in  mild  cases  of  infection. 

From  observations  made  repeatedly,  not  only  on  seed  beds  but  also 
experimentally  under  controlled  conditions  in  the  greenhouse  with  soils 
from  old  beds,  afterwards  transplanting  the  seedlings  to  soil  previously 
not  used  for  tobacco,  and  using  as  checks  healthy  plants  from  new  soil, 
the  writer  has  come  to  the  conclusion  that  at  least  80  per  cent,  of  our 
field  infections  come  from  the  seed  bed  and  do  not  originate  in  the  field  as 
is  commonly  supposed. 


MOSAIC   DISEASE   OF   TOBACCO. 


81 


Economic  Importance. 

It  is  very  difficult  to  estimate  the  loss  to  growers  due  to  mosaic  disease, 
as  the  prevalence  in  different  localities  varies  greatly,  as  also  does  the 
intensity  of  the  attack  in  different  seasons.  The  damage  resulting  from 
mosaic  disease  is  twofold:  first  the  plants  when  severely  attacked  are 
smaller  and  the  leaves  poorer  in  quality;  secondly,  the  buyer,  if  he  sees 
much  mosaic  in  a  field,  will  invariably  cut  the  price  a  few  cents  a  pound, 
as  the  leaves  affected  do  not  in  many  cases  make  a  valuable  wrapper  and 
are  much  poorer  in  quahty.  The  writer  has  observed  certain  fields  where 
the  loss  would  run  into  hundreds  of  dollars  from  this  cause  alone.  The 
amount  of  damage  done  by  late  mild  attacks  when  the  plants  are  maturing, 
or  appearing  on  the  sucker  growth  after  topping,  is  practically  negligible, 
and,  so  far  as  can  be  learned,  does  not  in  any  way  injure  the  commercial 
leaf.  It  is  always  well  to  clean  off  the  diseased  suckers,  however,  as  they 
present  a  very  ragged  appearance,  and  might  injure  the  sale  of  the  crop 
to  a  certain  extent.  There  is  no  question  but  that  during  certain  seasons 
the  loss  due  to  mosaic  is  quite  large,  but  an  exact  estimate  of  this  loss  is 
difficult  to  obtain,  owing  to  the  many  other  factors  involved. 

Infectious  Nature  of  the  Disease. 

That  the  mosaic  disease  is  very  infectious  is  well  known,  and  a  discus- 
sion of  the  detailed  experiments  on  this  point  is  not  necessary.  Experi- 
mentally it  has  been  repeatedly  shown  that  the  juice  from  all  parts  of  a 
diseased  plant  is  capable  of  transmitting  the  disease,  although  it  should 
be  stated  that  the  percentage  of  infection  obtained  from  the  root  extract 
is  considerably  lower  than  that  obtained  from  the  leaves.  A  few  of  the 
results  obtained  are  given  in  the  following  table,  however :  — 


Table  I,  —  Infectivity  of  the  Juice  from  Different  Parts  of  Diseased  Plants, 

August,  1909. 


Pabt  op  Diseased  Plant  used 
(Plants  fhom  Field). 

Number  of  Healthy  Seedlings 
inoculated. 

Number  of 
Plants  Dis- 
eased Three 
Weeks  after 
Inoculation. 

Leaves  showing  disease,         .  '     . 

CJontrol, 

Leaves  showing  disease, 

Control, 

Basal  leaves  (not  showing  disease), 

Control, 

Roots, 

Control, 

Roots 

10  (juice;  needle  pricks), 

10  (distilled  water;  needle  pricks), 

10  (insertion  of  tissue  into  veins), 

6  (insertion  of  healthy  tissue  into  veins), 
12  (juice;  needle  pricks), 

5  (distilled  water;  needle  pricks), 
21  (juice;  needle  pricks), 

7  (distilled  water;  needle  pricks), 
16  (insertion  of  tissue  into  veins). 

10 
9 

10 

1 
14 

6 

82  MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    175. 

Later  experiments  with  the  roots  of  other  diseased  plants  gave  similar 
low  results. 

It  is  a  very  easy  matter  to  infect  seedlings  at  the  time  of  transplanting, 
and  the  writer  has  repeatedly  seen  many  cases  in  the  field  which  could 
only  have  been  brought  about  by  such  infection.  It  is  only  necessary  to 
get  some  of  the  juice  from  the  diseased  plant  on  to  the  hands  to  transmit 
the  disease  by  handling  healthy  plants,  the  causal  agent  gaining  entrance 
through  the  broken  ends  of  roots,  leaf  hairs  or  broken  and  abraded  leaf 
areas.  In  some  of  the  experiments  conducted  relative  to  this  point,  a 
very  high  percentage  of  infection  has  been  obtained.  In  one  case  where 
the  juice  from  a  diseased  plant  was  very  thoroughly  rubbed  on  the  hands, 
and  40  healthy  seedlings  immediately  set,  no  care  being  used  to  guard 
against  bruising  the  leaves,  etc.,  31  plants  developed  the  disease  in  two 
weeks'  time.  In  another  experiment  where  62  seedlings  were  subjected  to 
the  same  treatment,  30  plants  developed  the  disease;  in  still  another, 
series  of  28  seedUngs,  21  developed  the  disease.  Controls  planted  at  the 
same  time,  handled  with  a  hand  rubbed  with  the  juice  of  a  healthy  leaf 
developed  the  mosaic  in  only  a  few  isolated  cases.  From  the  above  it 
can  easily  be  seen  that  great  care  should  be  exercised  in  the  matter  of 
handling  the  seedlings,  especially  diseased  seedlings. 

Contagious  Nature  of  the  Disease. 

In  spite  of  the  fact  that  it  is  held  by  some  investigators  that  the  mosaic 
disease  is  contagious,  the  wTiter  has  never  been  able  to  satisfactorily  dem- 
onstrate that  it  is.  Under  carefully  controlled  conditions  in  the  green- 
house, guarding  against  accidental  infection,  it  has  been  impossible  to 
demonstrate  the  contagious  nature  of  the  disease.  In  isolated  instances, 
indeed,  apparent  contagion  has  occurred,  but  it  is  believed  that  these 
cases  were  clue  to  accidental  infection,  as  the  percentage  was  so  low,  — 
less  than  2  per  cent.,  —  and  under  the  conditions  the  plants  were  subjected 
to,  such  as  contact,  spraying  of  the  juice  on  leaves,  etc.,  the  percentage 
should  have  been  much  higher  if  contagion  was  to  be  held  responsible. 

It  is  a  fact  that  it  is  only  necessary  to  break  or  rupture  the  trichomes  or 
hairs  on  the  leaf,  subsequently  spraying  with  diseased  juice,  to  obtain 
infection,  although  this  method  does  not  give  a  very  high  percentage. 
It  can  easily  be  seen  that  such  a  rupture  may  be  very  easily  brought 
about,  and  hence  apparent  contagion  occur.  As  is  stated  elsewhere  in 
this  paper,  insect  and  other  carriers  may  also  play  a  part  in  these  so- 
called  cases  of  contagion. 


MOSAIC   DISEASE    OF   TOBACCO.  83 


Pathological  Anatomy. 
Leaves. 

As  might  be  supposed,  there  are  great  differences  in  structure  between 
normal,  healthy  leaves  and  leaves  affected  with  the  mosaic  disease.  These 
differences  are  greatest,  naturally,  in  badly  diseased  leaves.  Woods  ^  was 
one  of  the  first  to  point  out  this  fact,  and  his  statements  have  been  re- 
peatedly verified  by  the  UTiter.  He  stated  that  the  hght  colored  areas 
were  not  normal,  and  that  "this  difference  consists  in  the  fact  that  in 
badly  diseased  plants  the  palisade  parenchyma  of  the  light  colored  areas 
is  not  developed  at  all.  All  the  tissue  between  the  upper  and  lower  epider- 
mis consists  of  a  spongy  or  respiratory  parenchyma  rather  more  closely 
packed  than  normal.  In  moderately  diseased  plants  the  palisade  paren- 
chyma of  the  light  area  is  greatly  modified.  Normally  the  palisade 
parenchyma  cells  of  a  healthy  plant  are  from  four  to  six  times  as  long  as 
broad.  In  a  moderately  diseased  plant,  however,  the  cells  are  nearly  as 
broad  as  they  are  long,  or  at  most,  not  more  than  twice  as  long  as  broad. 
As  a  rule,  the  modified  cells  of  the  leaf  pass  abruptly  into  the  normal  cells 
of  the  green  area." 

From  the  above  it  can  be  seen  that  Woods  was  of  the  opinion  that  the 
light  green  areas  were  abnormal  or  diseased,  and  that  the  dark  green 
areas  were  normal  and  healthy.  The  writer  in  his  observations  found 
this  to  be  true  in  general,  but  occasionally  the  dark  green  areas  showed  a 
more  closely  packed  parenchyma  than  in  normal  leaves,  and  always  the 
palisade  layer  was  well  developed  and  approached  the  normal  in  character. 
The  development  or  non-development  of  the  palisade  layer,  as  Woods 
hinted,  is  dependent  on  the  degree  of  severity  of  the  disease.  The  lighter 
the  attack  the  less  are  the  palisade  cells  and  parenchyma  tissue  altered, 
and  vice-versa.  This  the  writer  found  to  be  true  in  so  far  as  anatomical 
differences  were  concerned,  but  as  will  be  noted  later,  the  dark  green, 
apparently  normal,  healthy  tissue  contained  some  of  the  infective  agent  of 
the  disease. 

The  structure  of  the  dark  green  areas  varies  only  slightly  from  that  of 
the  normal  leaf,  with  the  few  exceptions  above  noted,  and  may  be  con- 
sidered normal  in  character.  The  writer  has  sectioned  many  leaves  in  all 
stages  of  disease,  and  these  structural  differences  have  always  been  found 
to  occur  in  the  manner  above  indicated.  These  differences  in  structure 
have  been  taken  up  more  or  less  in  detail,  as  some  investigators  have  held, 
and  still  hold,  that  the  dark  green  areas  are  the  part  diseased,  and  that 
the  light  green  areas  are  normal,  inasmuch  as  they  approach  the  normal 
leaf  in  color  in  many  cases,  most  probably  basing  their  assumption  on 
the  fact  that  the  dark  areas  form  blister-like  growths  and  are  sometimes 
darker  in  color  than  normal  leaves.     No  one  recently  appears  to  have 

>  Woods,  A.  F.:  Inhibiting  Action  of  Oxidase  on  Diastase.  Science,  n.  s.,  XI.,  No.  262,  17-19 
(1900). 


84         MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    175. 

investigated  the  structure  of  the  dark  and  light  areas  carefully  in  the  case 
of  the  tobacco,  except  Woods.  It  was  to  verify  Woods'  statements  that 
the  wTiter  took  up  this  phase  of  the  matter,  and  mention  will  again  be 
made  of  it  in  connection  with  the  biochemistry  of  the  leaf.  There  can 
be  no  doubt  as  to  the  correctness  of  Woods'  contention  that  the  light  green 
areas  are  abnormal  and  diseased;  but  that  the  dark  green  areas  are  not 
diseased,  at  least  in  certain  cases,  cannot  be  so  definitely  stated.  Their 
structure  may  be  somewhat  modified  by  the  increased  functioning  thrown 
on  the  healthy  cells.  On  the  other  hand,  it  is  fallacious  to  state  that  the 
light  green  are  the  healthy,  and  the  dark  green  are  the  diseased,  portions 
of  a  leaf. 

Plates  III.  and  IV.  show  three  cross  sections  from  leaves.  III.  showing 
the  cross  section  of  a  healthy  leaf;  IV,,  that  of  the  Hght  green  area  of  a 
diseased  leaf  and  of  a  dark  green  area  of  the  same  leaf.  It  wiU  be  noted 
that  the  paUsade  layer  is  practically  suppressed  in  IV.  (1),  or  the  Hght 
green  portion,  while  in  IV.  (2)  the  palisade  layer  approaches  the  normal 
in  character  except  for  a  closer  packing  of  cells  in  general.  Milder 
cases  of  diseased  leaves  vary  between  these  limits.  These  figures  are 
from  caynera  lucida  drawings  of  material  killed  and  fixed  in  medium  chrom- 
acetic  acid.  In  the  material  used  the  normal  leaf  section  is  somewhat 
thicker  than  those  of  the  diseased  leaf,  but  for  comparative  purposes  is 
perfectly  satisfactory. 

Stems. 
The  anatomical  differences  in  the  leaves  of  healthy  and  diseased  to- 
bacco plants  have  been  given  in  the  preceding  paragraphs,  and  as  it  was 
desired  to  carry  the  investigations  further  to  cover  the  entire  plant,  re- 
peated examinations  were  made  of  both  cross  sections  and  longi-sections 
of  stems  of  plants  in  various  stages  of  disease,  and  also  of  healthy,  normal 
plants  grown  both  in  the  field  and  greenhouse.  It  should  be  stated  at 
this  point  that  occasionally  the  writer  has  observed  on  the  stems  of  some 
badly  mosaicked  plants  a  mottling,  or,  rather,  a  streaking  of  the  stem,  a 
portion  of  which  would  be  darker  green  than  the  remainder,  and  this  is 
without  question  a  manifestation  of  the  mosaic  disease.  Sections  of  such 
stems,  however,  showed  absolutely  no  variation  in  structure  from  those  of 
normal  plants,  and  in  no  case,  although  the  examinations  covered  an 
extended  period  of  time,  was  it  possible  to  show  any  structural  difference 
between  the  stems  of  badly  diseased  mosaic  plants  and  those  of  healthy 
plants  of  the  same  age.  Examinations  of  the  stem  close  to  the  terminal 
apex  of  the  plant  revealed  the  same  conditions  as  those  of  other  parts  of 
the  stem.  No  differences  were  observable  except  in  the  matter  of  size  and 
arrangement  of  cells,  such  as  would  naturally  be  expected  when  we  take 
into  consideration  the  differences  in  size  and  development  of  the  stem  near 
the  terminal  apex  and  progressively  towards  the  base. 


PLATE  III. 


Section  through  normal  tobacco  leaf:  (a)  epidermis;   (6)  palisade  cells;  (c)  parenchyma  tissue. 


PLATE  IV. 


oooLfeDQQP^ 


Sections  through  mosaic-diseased  leaves.  (1)  Light  green  area:  (o)  epidermis;  (6)  palisade 
cells;  (c)  parenchyma  tissue.  (2)  Dark  green  area:  (a)  epidermis;  (6)  palisade  cells; 
(c)  parenchyma  tissue. 


MOSAIC   DISEASE    OF   TOBACCO.  85 


Roots. 

In  the  same  manner  roots  of  mosaicked  and  healthy  plants  were  ex- 
ammed  at  various  times  under  all  conditions  of  growth  and  severity  of 
disease,  and  in  every  case  the  root  structure  was  found  to  be  normal. 
Root  tips  from  healthy  and  diseased  plants  showed  absolutely  no  differ- 
ences in  structure.  It  might  be  anticipated  that,  as  the  disease  first  mani- 
fests itself  in  the  dividing  cells  of  the  leaves,  there  might  be  a  supple- 
mentary differentiation,  so  to  speak,  of  the  meristematic  tissue  at  the 
growing  point  of  the  root,  functioning  co-ordinately  with  that  of  the  aerial 
part  of  the  plant.  No  such  condition  was  observable,  however,  and,  so 
far  as  the  writer  has  been  able  to  find,  there  is  no  manifestation  of  local 
cell  disturbances  in  the  root  such  as  are  found  in  the  leaf  tissue. 

The  causal  agent  of  the  disease,  however,  as  has  previously  been  noted, 
is  without  question  present  in  all  parts  of  the  plant,  and  it  should  not  be 
stated  that  it  is  confined  to  those  parts  which  show  structural  variation. 

Fungi  and  the  Mosaic  Disease. 

Almost  from  the  first  it  has  been  established  that  no  fungi  are  asso- 
ciated with  the  cause  and  development  of  the  mosaic  disease  of  tobacco. 
In  no  ease  where  careful  work  has  been  conducted  under  conditions  elimina- 
ting the  possibility  of  accidental  infection  has  any  fungus  been  found 
associated  with  the  trouble.  Cultures  of  fungi  obtained  occasionally 
from  leaves  have  always  been  traceable  to  careless  manipulation  or  ex- 
ternal infection,  and  the  fungus  obtained  failed  to  infect  healthy  plants, 
no  matter  what  methods  of  inoculation  were  used. 

The  writer  has  occasionally  obtained  cultures  on  various  media  such  as 
oat  agar,  tobacco  leaf  agar  and  prune  agar,  from  the  tissue  of  the  so- 
called  "rusted"  spots  which  are  sometimes  a  late  manifestation  of  the 
last  stages  of  the  mosaic;  but,  as  with  previous  investigators,  it  was  found 
impossible  to  infect  healthy  plants  from  these  cultures,  either  by  needle 
pricks,  spraying,  or  inserting  the  fungus  into  incisions  in  the  leaf  or  stem. 

These  experiments  with  fungi  were  made  merely  to  demonstrate  to  the 
writer's  own  satisfaction  that  they  could  not  be  the  causative  agents  of 
the  disease,  as  there  might  be  a  possibihty  that  they  were  latent  in  the 
plant  during  the  earlier  stages  of  the  disease  and  only  developed  super- 
ficially during  the  later  stages. 

According  to  Jenkins  ^  and  others  these  rusted  spots  which  are  some- 
times observed  are  primarily  caused  by  a  drying  out  and  disintegration  of 
the  cell  tissue,  which  has  been  weakened  -by  the  disease  and  which  thus 
forms  a  suitable  medium,  under  favorable  conditions,  for  the  develop- 
ment of  secondary  fungi  and  micro-organisms.  This  view  is  also  held  by 
the  writer  as  a  result  of  observations  extending  over  a  series  of  years. 

»  Jenkins,  E.  H.:  Studies  on  the  Tobacco  Crop  of  Connecticut.  Conn.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  Bui. 
No.  180,  p.  56  (1914). 


86  MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    175. 


Bacteria  and  the  Mosaic  Disease. 

Among  the  manj'-  theories  advanced  regarding  the  cause  of  the  mosaic 
the  chief  one  for  some  time,  particularly  among  the  earlier  investigators, 
was  that  of  bacterial  infection  either  through  the  agency  of  infected  soil 
or  otherwise.  Mayer,  ^  in  his  rather  extended  study  of  the  disease,  came 
to  the  conclusion  that  it  was  caused  by  bacteria,  but  was  unable  to  isolate 
the  organism.  Prilleux  and  Delacroix ^  claimed  to  have  fovmd  an  organism 
associated  with  the  mosaicked  leaves,  but  their  descriptions  leave  one  in 
doubt  as  to  whether  they  were  working  with  the  true  mosaic  disease  or 
not.  It  is  very  probable  that  they  were  dealing  with  another  disease 
which  occurs  in  France,  but  which  is  somewhat  different  from  the  mosaic 
disease.  The  next  important  work  on  the  bacteria  supposedly  connected 
with  this  disease  was  done  by  Iwanowski.  *  He  isolated  several  organisms 
from  the  juice  of  diseased  leaves,  and  by  reinoculation  was  able  to  cause 
infection,  but  only  in  a  very  small  number  of  instances.  This  he  explains 
by  a  probable  attenuation  of  the  organism  when  grown  on  artificial  media. 
Hunger,  <  in  a  very  critical  review  of  the  bacterial  theory,  stated  that  he 
was  unable  in  any  way  to  substantiate  the  findings  of  Iwanowski,  and 
that  although  he  observed  certain  bodies  in  the  cells,  he  was  not  able  to 
classify  them  as  either  bacteria  or  plasmodia,  as  they  disappeared  after 
heating  with  phenol  chloral  hydrate,  while  the  rest  of  the  cell  contents 
were  unaffected.  More  recently  AUard^  has  advanced  the  opinion  as 
a  result  of  his  investigations  that  the  disease  is  parasitic  in  nature  but 
does  not  attempt  to  discuss  the  character  of  the  parasite,  and  apparently 
has  made  little  attempt  to  demonstrate  anatomically  the  presence  or 
absence  of  bacteria.  Hunger's  work  is  probably  the  most  satisfactory  of 
its  kind  along  this  line. 

The  writer  has  made  examinations  of  diseased  plants,  sectioning  leaves, 
stems  and  even  the  roots,  but  has  never  been  able  satisfactorily  to 
demonstrate  the  presence  of  bacteria  in  the  tissues.  In  this  work  a 
variety  of  stains  were  used,  cliief  of  which,  however,  were  Ziehl's  carbol 
fuchsin  and  Heidenhain's  iron  hsemotoxylin. 

It  is  to  be  noted  in  this  connection  that  all  investigators  have  apparently 
confined  their  studies  to  the  leaves  or  part  of  the  plant  in  which  the 
disease  showed  itself,  and  very  few  attempts,  if  any,  have  been  made  to 
study  the  question  of  the  possible  presence  of  bacteria  in  tissue  far  removed 
from  the  diseased  portions.    In  view  of  the  fact  that  the  juice  from  all 

»  Mayer,  A.:  Over  de  in  Nederland  dikwijk  voorkomende  Mozaikziekte  der  Tabak.  Land. 
Tijdschr.  (1885). 

»  Prilleux,  E.  E.  and  Delacroix,  G.:  Maladies  bacillaires  de  divers  v6g6taux.  Compt.  Rend. 
Acad.  Sci.  Paris,  118:  668-671  (1894). 

'  Iwanowski,  D.:  Uber  die  Mosaikkrankheit  der  Tabakspflanze,  Zeit.  f.  Pflanzenkrank,  13: 
1-41,  pi.  1-3  (1903). 

*  Hunger,  F.  W.  T.:  Untersuchungen  und  Betrachtungen  uber  die  Mosaikkrankheit  der 
Tabakspflanze.    Zeit.  f.  Pflanzenkrank,  15:  257-311  (1905). 

'  Allard,  H.  A.:  Mosaic  Disease  of  Tobacco.    U.  S.  D.  A.,  Bur.  Plant  Ind.  Bui.  No.  40  (1914). 


MOSAIC   DISEASE   OF   TOBACCO.  87 

parts  of  a  diseased  plant  will  cause  infection,  it  would  be  natural  to  sup- 
pose that  if  bacteria  were  the  causal  agent,  it  should  be  possible  to  demon- 
strate their  presence  in  the  different  parts  of  a  diseased  plant.  This  has 
never  been  done,  and  in  the  writer's  study  of  the  anatomy  of  diseased 
plants  it  has  never  been  possible  to  demonstrate  the  presence  of  bacteria 
in  the  different  tissues.  The  writer  has  many  times  attempted  to  obtain 
cultures  of  bacteria  from  diseased  tissue,  and  in  some  cases  cultures  of 
organisms  were  obtained  on  various  media,  but  they  proved  in  every  case 
to  be  secondary  in  character,  and  were  not  capable  of  reproducing  the 
disease.  In  the  Ught  of  all  later  investigations  the  evidence  points  over- 
whelmingly to  the  absence  of  bacteria,  in  the  present-day  sense  of  the 
term,  as  the  causal  agent  of  the  disease. 

Dissemination  Agents. 
Insects. 

The  fact  that  many  fungous  and  bacterial  diseases  are  often  transmitted 
by  insects,  as  well  as  other  agents,  has  been  long  known  and  thoroughly 
estabUshed,  but  until  Allard  {loc.  cit.)  called  attention  to  the  fact  that 
the  mosaic  disease  could  be  carried  by  aphids,  and  one  in  particular 
{Macrosiphum  tobaci  Perg.),  nothing  had  been  published  on  this  phase  of 
the  matter.  Allard  in  well-controlled  experiments  demonstrated  beyond 
a  reasonable  doubt  that  the  disease  was  so  communicated.  Clinton 
(loc.  cit.)  made  a  few  observations  on  the  infection  of  healthy  plants  by 
the  tobacco  horn  worms  which  had  been  feeding  on  diseased  leaves,  but 
was  unable  to  demonstrate  that  the  disease  could  be  so  transmitted  either 
by  the  excreta  ejected  by  the  worm  or  by  its  biting  and  feeding  on  the 
healthy  plants.  His  results  were  negative  in  the  few  experiments  made. 
Observations  made  in  the  field  during  the  progress  of  the  writer's  work 
have  not  shown  conclusively  that  the  disease  is  communicated  by  biting 
insects,  such  as  the  tobacco  horn  worm,  grasshoppers  and  a  small  black 
flea  beetle  of  more  or  less  common  occurrence  in  our  fields. 

Occasionally  aphids  have  been  found  infesting  the  leaves  of  tobacco  in 
our  fields,  but  so  far  as  could  be  judged  were  present  in  too  small  numbers 
to  be  active  agents  in  transmitting  the  trouble.  As  a  rule,  comparatively 
few  aphid  infestations  are  found  in  our  tobacco  fields. 

In  the  greenhouse  during  several  winters  tobacco  plants  grown  in  benches 
were  infested  with  white  fly,  and  it  was  at  first  feared  that  they  might 
carry  the  infection  from  diseased  to  healthy  plants  in  the  same  benches. 
This,  however,  was  not  the  case,  and  it  has  never  been  possible  to  demon- 
strate positively  that  the  white  fly  is  an  active  agent  in  the  spread  of  the 
disease.  This  insect  is,  of  course,  of  rare  occurrence  in  our  fields,  but 
may  possibly  do  damage  in  the  south.  It  apparently  feeds  and  breeds 
freely  under  greenhouse  conditions  on  the  underside  of  the  leaves. 

In  order  to  ascertain  more  definitely  the  possibility  of  infection  by  these 
insects,  adult  white  flies  from  badly  mosaicked  leaves  were  carefully  re- 


88         MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    175. 

moved  and  placed  on  the  underside  of  the  leaves  of  tobacco  plants,  en- 
closed in  a  small  cloth-covered  cage,  and  were  allowed  to  remain  on  the 
tobacco  leaves  of  the  plants  in  these  cages  for  four  days.  After  this 
length  of  time  the  plants  were  removed  from  the  cages  and  placed  on  a 
bench  at  some  distance  from  those  containing  mosaicked  plants  badly 
infested  with  white  fly.  On  none  of  the  plants  did  mosaic  develop.  The 
plants  were  later  placed  in  close  juxtaposition  to  those  in  the  original 
benches,  which,  as  indicated,  were  at  this  time  heavily  infested  with 
the  white  fly  and  badly  mosaicked,  but  although  the  plants  remained 
until  maturity,  no  cases  of  mosaic  developed  on  them  in  spite  of  a  heavy 
infestation  of  white  fly. 

The  writer's  observations  on  the  activities  of  aphids  as  carriers  of  in- 
fection have  not  been  so  extensive  as  in  the  case  of  the  white  fly,  as  only 
minor  infestations  of  the  former  occurred  in  the  greenhouses;  and  the 
indications  pointed  to  the  fact  that,  although  there  were  a  certain  number 
of  aphids  present  on  the  leaves  of  both  healthy  and  diseased  plants,  so  far 
as  was  observable  no  cases  of  infection  from  this  source  arose,  as  the 
mosaic  developed  only  on  an  average  of  1  case  out  of  30,  except  on  the 
plants  which  were  artificially  inoculated  with  the  juice  from  diseased 
leaves.  It  should  be  stated,  however,  that  aphids  present  in  the  green- 
house were  not  of  the  same  species  as  that  under  consideration  by  Allard, 
and  there  is  no  reason  to  doubt  the  accuracy  of  his  observations  on  the 
species  tabaci  Perg. 

The  question  of  insects  as  carriers  of  the  mosaic  disease  as  well  as  of 
many  other  diseases  is  still  open  to  discussion ;  and  it  may  be  that  in  the 
case  of  the  mosaic  a  very  heavy  infestation  of  aphids  is  necessary  to  bring 
about  a  successful  infection  of  healthy  plants,  as  the  amount  of  active 
infective  material  carried  by  such  insects  would  in  any  case  be  very  small, 
and  accumulative  effects  of  the  activities  of  several  insects  might  be 
necessary  to  introduce  a  sufficient  amount  of  the  active  principle  to  trans- 
mit the  disease. 

Workmen. 

It  has  been  shown  that  the  disease  is  highly  infectious  and  it  has  also 
.been  proved  repeatedly  by  many  investigators  that  it  is  very  easy  to 
transmit  the  disease  to  healthy  plants  at  the  time  of  transplanting.  A 
workman  handling  diseased  seedlings,  and  subsequently  healthy  ones, 
will  very  often  infect  them.  Several  instances  of  tliis  have  come  to  the 
writer's  attention,  every  other  plant  for  some  distance  in  a  row  developing 
mosaic  within  a  month  after  transplanting.  The  same  condition  has  also 
been  observed  by  Clinton  {loc.  cit.)  in  Cormecticut,  and  can  only  be  ex- 
plained by  the  fact  that  the  workman's  hands  were  infected  through 
handling  a  diseased  plant,  and  the  infection  then  transmitted  to  healthy 
ones,  the  causal  agent  being  introduced  through  broken  tissue  of  the 
leaves  or  roots  of  the  seedlings.  This  method  of  transmission  is  particu- 
larly striking  in  the  above  case,  as  the  same  individual  plants  every  other 
plant  in  a  row  when  working  the  ordinary  planter.     Of  course,  there 


MOSAIC    DISEASE    OF   TOBACCO.  89 

have  been  many  cases  where  every  plant  for  some  distance  in  a  row 
has  developed  mosaic,  but  this  might  be  explained  if  it  is  assumed  that 
both  workmen  had  handled  diseased  seedlings,  or  if  a  number  of  plants  in 
the  lot  were  diseased.  In  time,  the  causal  agent  becomes  so  attenuated 
that  infection  ceases,  and  the  remainder  of  the  row  remains  healthy. 
Experimentally,  this  method  of  transmission  has  also  been  shown  to  be 
possible,  and  a  high  percentage  of  infection  has  been  obtained.  In  one 
experiment,  after  thoroughly  rubbing  the  hands  with  the  tissue  of  a  dis- 
eased plant,  and  then  pulling  and  transplanting  healthy  seedlings,  over  80 
per  cent,  of  the  transplants  became  mosaicked  within  a  month.  Only  a 
relatively  small  number  of  seedlings  in  this  instance  were  treated  in 
this  way,  however,  the  total  being  28,  of  which  24  developed  mosaic 
symptoms  within  three  weeks. 

Another  manner  of  transmission  is  by  cultivation.  If  some  of  the  sap 
from  a  diseased  plant  comes  in  contact  with  the  tools,  etc.,  employed, 
there  is  a  possibility  that  the  infection  might  be  carried  to  healthy  plants 
by  this  means,  but  the  percentage  of  infection  of  this  character  is  probably 
very  low  in  actual  field  practice. 

The  workmen  when  budding  and  topping  are  very  often  carriers  of 
infection,  as  they  are  not  as  a  rule  careful  to  leave  untouched  the  plants 
showing  mosaic  symptoms  but  take  the  plants  as  they  come,  and  thus 
spread  the  disease  to  many  healthy  plants.  This  method  of  dissemina- 
tion has  been  very  often  observed,  and  perhaps  is  the  most  fruitful  source 
of  infection  in  the  field.  The  subsequent  new  growth  will  almost  in- 
variably be  mosaic  in  character,  as  will  also  the  suckers  developing  later. 
The  amount  of  damage  to  the  marketable  leaves,  however,  providing  the 
suckers  are  removed,  is  very  slight,  if  any,  and  cannot  be  said  to  injure 
the  leaf  in  any  way,  at  least  in  so  far  as  our  observations  bear  on  this 
point.  If  the  suckers  are  left,  however,  the  plants  present  a  ragged  ap- 
pearance, and  the  mosaic  on  the  suckers  is  quite  noticeable,  and  might 
injure  the  sale  of  the  crop  at  the  price  it  ought  to  conunand. 

Seed. 

The  causal  agent  is  not  carried  by  the  seed,  and  seed  from  mosaic 
plants  has  never  produced  a  larger  percentage  of  mosaicked  seedlings  than 
seed  collected  from  healthy  plants,  when  germinated  and  grown  under 
the  same  conditions.  It  is  difficult  to  conceive  of  this,  as  it  has  been 
shown  by  AUard  (loc.  cit.)  that  the  tissues  closely  enveloping  the  seed  in 
the  pod  are  capable  of  causing  infection;  but  the  writer  has  saved  seed 
from  badly  mosaicked  plants  for  three  successive  years,  and  the  seedlings 
from  such  seed  showed  no  signs  of  the  disease,  unless  infection  was  pro- 
duced artificially  through  some  external  agency. 

It  should  be  pointed  out,  however,  that  there  is  the  possibility  that  the 
vigor  of  the  seed  from  mosaicked  plants  may  be  less  than  that  from  healthy 
ones,  and  consequently  the  plants  developed  from  such  seeds,  being 
weaker,  might  be  more  susceptible  to  the  factors  active  in  the  production  of 


90 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    175. 


mosaic  symptoms.  It  is  impossible  to  make  a  definite  statement  on  this 
point,  however,  as  the  writer  has  not  been  able  to  gather  sufficient 
data  over  a  series  of  years  to  prove  or  disprove  it. 

Fertilization  in  Relation  to  Mosaic  Disease. 

It  has  been  repeatedly  shown  by  many  investigators  (see  historical 
summary)  that  a  lack  of  plant  food  alone  will  not  suffice  to  produce  the 
mosaic  disease,  and  the  writer  has  also,  in  connection  with  the  tomato, 
shown  that  an  excess  of  nitrogen,  potash,  phosphoric  acid  and  lime  will 
not  produce  nor  intensify  the  disease.  ^ 

The  same  has  been  found  to  be  true  for  tobacco.  In  our  experiments 
on  tobacco,  the  method  made  use  of  was  to  add  to  each  pot  the  proper 
amount  of  a  complete  tobacco  fertilizer  (in  this  case  applied  at  the  rate  of 
3,000  pounds  per  acre),  and  then  to  add  an  additional  amount  of  nitrogen, 
potash  and  phosphoric  acid  in  quickly  available  forms,  equal  to  that 
already  present.  No  mosaic  was  produced  in  any  case,  although  where 
the  amount  of  nitrogen  was  trebled  a  rather  pecuUar  malformation  of  the 
leaves  was  observed  which  at  first  sight  might  have  been  mistaken  for 
mosaic  sjonptoms.  All  inoculations  failed  to  take,  however,  and  the 
trouble  therefore  could  not  have  been  the  true  mosaic. 

It  has  been  held  that  liming  would  lessen  the  prevalence  of  the  disease, 
but  the  writer's  observations  and  experiments  do  not  bear  out  this  state- 
ment. Under  field  conditions  this  may  be  the  case  in  certain  seasons,  but 
continued  observations  from  year  to  year  on  heavily  limed  areas  show  no 
appreciable  lessening  of  the  number  of  mosaicked  plants.  Seedlings  and 
plants  grown  in  the  greenhouse  in  soil  kno^AOi  to  be  heavily  infected  in- 
dicated the  same  results,  as  also  did  the  work  on  new  soil  with  mosaicked 
seedlings.  Here  lime  was  applied  in  varying  amounts  at  the  rate  of  from 
500  to  6,000  pounds  per  acre.  No  appreciable  effect  on  the  mosaic  disease 
was  observable.    The  results  obtained  are  given  in  the  following  tables :  — 

Table  II.  —  Effect  of  Liming  on  Mosaic. 

[New  soil,  lime,  mosaicked  seedlings.] 


Lime  (Pounds  per  Acre). 


New  Soil  in 

Pots  (Number 

planted  with 

Mosaicked 

Seedlings). 


Number  of 
Plants  show- 
ing Recovery 
One  Month 
after  Planting. 


500,  . 
1,000,  . 
2,000,  . 
4,000,  . 
6,000,  . 
No  lime  (check), 


'  Twentieth  Annual  Report,  Mass.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  (1908),  p.  140. 


MOSAIC   DISEASE    OF   TOBACCO. 


91 


The  lime  was  applied  to  this  new  soil,  in  the  different  amounts  indicated, 
one  week  previous  to  the  setting  of  the  plants. 

No  appreciable  differences  were  observable  in  the  subsequent  growth  as 
regards  intensity  of  mosaic  symptoms,  all  the  plants  being  comparatively 
evenly  mosaicked.    There  was  not  a  single  case  of  recovery. 


Table  III.  —  Effect  of  Liming  on  Mosaic. 

[Infected  seed  bed  soil,  lime,  seed.] 


Lime  (Pounds  per  Ache). 


Per  Cent 

Infection 

(Seedlings 

Twelve  Weeks 

Old). 


500,  . 
1,000,  . 
2,000,  . 
4,000,  . 
6,000,  . 
No  lime  (check), 


12.0 
18.4 

9.8 
21.0 

8.6 
13.7 


The  lime  was  here  applied  to  a  soil  which  was  heavily  infected,  and  the 
seed  sowed  very  thinly  in  the  flats  containing  the  various  amounts  of  lime 
and  soil.  The  seedUngs  were  allowed  to  grow  in  the  fiats  until  they  were 
counted.  They  were  naturally  crowded  somewhat,  but  were  free  from 
insects  during  the  period  of  growth.  It  is  possible  that  some  infection 
may  have  occurred,  however,  but  there  are  very  strong  indications  that 
liming  had  no  beneficial  action  in  lessening  the  disease.  As  the  results 
are  so  variable  the  matter  cannot  be  considered  as  absolutely  settled,  but 
certainly  no  consistently  favorable  results  were  obtained  in  this  experi- 
ment from  the  use  of  lime. 


Effect  of  Colored  Light  on  Mosaic  Disease. 

In  connection  with  work  on  the  mosaic  disease  of  tobacco  it  had  long 
been  noted,  in  that  section  of  the  Connecticut  Valley  where  the  crop  was 
grown  under  shade,  that  the  plants  appeared  in  general  to  be  much  less 
affected  with  the  mosaic  disease  than  were  those  grown  in  the  open. 
This  fact  has  already  been  noted  by  Sturgis  ^  in  Connecticut.  Investi- 
gations were  outlined,  in  conjunction  with  other  work  on  this  disease 
already  under  way,  relative  to  a  study  of  the  effects  of  various  light 
conditions  on  the  intensification  or  reduction  of  the  disease.  While  the 
writer's  preliminary  work  was  in  progress,  Lodewijks  ^  published  a  paper 

'  Sturgis,  W.  C:  On  the  Effects,  on  Tobacco,  of  Shading  and  the  Application  of  Lime.  Conn. 
Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  Ann.  Rept.,  23,  252-261  (1899). 

'  Lodewijks,  J.  A.,  Jr.:  Zur  Mosaikkrankheit  dea  Tabaks.  Rec.  Trav.  Neerlandais,  Vol.  7, 
107-129  (1910). 


92         MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    175. 

on  the  effects  of  colored  light  on  mosaic-diseased  plants,  and  as  a 
result  of  his  experiments  stated  that  a  cure  was  effected  by  blue  light, 
red  light  diminished  the  disease,  and  suffused  light  checked  it  somewhat. 
In  brief,  his  methods  of  experimentation  and  conclusion  were  as  follows :  — 

The  diseased  leaves  of  a  plant  were  covered  with  a  cloth  hood  of  the 
desired  color,  of  a  sufficient  size  to  allow  ample  room  for  growth.  The 
apparently  healthy  basal  leaves  were  left  uncovered  and  exposed  to  the 
normal  daylight.  After  a  time  the  hoods  were  removed,  and  it  was  found 
that  in  the  case  of  the  plants  exposed  under  the  blue  hood  a  cure  was  ef- 
fected; those  exposed  under  a  red  hood  showed  a  diminution  in  the 
severity  of  the  disease;  and  in  the  case  of  plants  exposed  to  the  suffused 
light  alone  the  disease  was  somewhat  checked.  The  cloth  used  for  the 
red  and  blue  hoods  was  a  rather  coarse  cotton  material  similar  to  that  used 
for  making  flags. 

Several  investigators  had  noted  the  apparent  beneficial  effects  resulting 
from  growing  diseased  plants  in  suffused  light,  but  Lodewijks  was  the 
first  to  really  study  the  effects  produced  by  colored  light,  although  Bauer 
appears  to  have  made  some  observations  on  this  point.  As  in  no  case 
could  the  writer  find  that  Lodewijks  in  his  work  had  reinoculated  from  the 
apparently  cured  plants  to  healthy  ones,  to  prove  the  presence  or  absence 
of  the  causal  agent,  and  as  it  is  often  present  and  active  in  apparently 
healthy  leaves  of  diseased  plants,  as  has  been  shown  many  times,  it  was 
thought  necessary  to  settle  the  point  as  to  the  presence  or  absence  of  the 
causal  agent  in  plants  treated  as  in  Lodewijks'  work. 

Method.  —  The  method  of  treatment  of  diseased  plants  was  in  every 
way  similar  to  that  employed  by  Lodewijks  as  to  texture  of  cloth,  methods 
of  covering  the  plants,  etc.  The  cloth  covers  were  held  away  from  the 
plant  by  means  of  wire  hoops,  and  the  cloth  was  tied  around  the  stem  of 
the  plant  below  the  diseased  leaves.  Plate  V.  shows  a  hood  in  place  over 
a  field-grown  plant,  and  gives  a  clear  idea  of  the  arrangement  of  the  hoops, 
etc. 

The  cloth  used  was  a  coarse  grade  of  cotton,  and  the  colors  were  cad- 
mium orange,  ox-blood  red  and  indulin  blue.  ^ 

Plants  showing  well-developed  symptoms  of  the  mosaic  disease  were 
selected  for  the  experiment,  none  of  which  had  less  than  four  character- 
istically diseased  leaves,  the  lower  remaining  leaves  apparently  healthy. 
The  hoods  were  placed  over  the  diseased  leaves  as  above  noted,  and  left 
on  for  the  required  time,  in  most  of  the  ex-periments  twenty  to  thirty 
days.  At  the  end  of  this  period  the  hoods  were  removed  and  the  plants 
carefully  examined  for  visible  symptoms  of  the  disease.  Two  leaves  from 
the  upper  (i.e.,  the  part  under  the  hood)  portion  of  the  plant  were  removed 
under  absolutely  aseptic  conditions,  the  juice  expressed  and  healthy 
plants  inoculated  therewith  by  means  of  glass  capillaries  inserted  just 
below  the  terminal  leaflets.'  Control  inoculations  with  distilled  water  and 
boiled  juice  were  also  made  at  the  same  time.    The  plants,  after  the 

'  Ridgway,  Robert:  Color  Standards  and  Color  Nomenclature.    Washington,  D.  C.  (1912). 


PLATE  V. 


■■w 


^mk 


I'itTect  of  cidorcil  lislil  o"  inos;iic  (li^eatio;  allowing  iiietliod  of  ulUidiing  hoods  over  leaves. 


MOSAIC   DISEASE    OF   TOBACCO. 


93 


removal  of  the  leaves  above  mentioned,  were  allowed  to  grow  to  maturity 
under  normal  light  conditions. 

Most  of  the  experiments  were  carried  on  in  the  greenhouse,  where  tem- 
perature and  other  conditions  were  under  more  direct  control  than  in  the 
field,  although  field  experiments  later  repeated  gave  the  same  results,  but, 
of  course,  in  this  case  there  was  a  greater  chance  of  subsequent  infection 
through  careless  handling,  insect  attacks,  etc.  In  the  following  jjaragraphs 
are  tabulated  the  results  of  a  typical  series  of  experiments  relative  to  the 
effects  of  light  on  mosaicked  plants. 

Experimental  Data. 

Red  Cloth.  —  Three  plants  were  covered  with  the  red  cloth  hoods  for 
twenty  days.  The  covers  were  then  removed,  and  in  all  cases  visible 
symptoms  of  the  disease  were  stih  present,  although  the  color  variation 
between  light  and  dark  green  areas  was  not  so  marked  as  at  the  beginning 
of  the  experiment.  All  the  new  growth,  in  addition  to  the  leaves  diseased 
at  the  time  the  hoods  were  put  on,  also  showed  the  mottling  distinctly. 
A  week  after  the  hoods  were  removed  all  the  plants  still  showed  the 
disease  in  undiminished  severity. 

Healthy  plants  inoculated  with  the  juice  from  the  leaves  confined  under 
the  hood  became  diseased  in  from  nine  to  eighteen  days'  time.  Controls 
inoculated  in  the  same  manner  with  boiled  juice  from  the  same  leaves, 
and  with  distilled  sterile  water,  remained  with  very  few  exceptions 
healthy.  Table  IV.  gives  the  results  of  the  inoculation  experiments  in 
one  series. 


Table  IV.  —  Result  of  Inoculation  with  Juice  from  Plants  grown  under 

Red  Hoods. 


Plant  No. 


Number  of 
Healthy 

Plants  Inocu- 
lated with 
Juice  from 
Leaves  of 

Treated  Plant. 


Number  of 
Inoculated 
Plants  show- 
ing Mosaic  at 
the  End  of 
Eighteen 
Days. 


A-1. 
B-L 
C-1, 


Controls  inoculated  with  boiled  juice,  10;  diseased  in  eighteen  days,  1. 

Controls  inoculated  with  distilled,  sterile  water,  10;   diseased  in  eighteen  days,  0. 


From  the  above  results  it  may  be  seen  that  there  was  a  diminution  in 
the  color  variation  in  diseased  leaves ;  it  was  not  of  a  permanent  character, 
the  plants  all  showing  the  disease  in  undiminished  severity  again  after  a 
short  exposure  to  normal  daylight.  The  causal  agent  of  the  disease  was 
still  highly  infectious. 


94         MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    175. 

In  a  second  series  the  hoods  were  allowed  to  remain  over  the  plants 
for  thirty  days,  as  it  was  thought  that  a  twenty-day  exposure  might 
have  been  too  short,  but  no  appreciable  variation  in  the  results  was 
obtained  as  a  result  of  the  longer  treatment. 

Orange  Cloth.  —  In  this  series  two  plants  were  covered  with  orange 
hoods  for  a  period  of  thirty  days.  On  removing  the  covers  it  was  found 
that  the  visible  symptoms  of  the  disease  were,  if  anything,  intensified. 
The  growth  was  somewhat  more  spindling,  the  leaves  narrower,  and  the 
light  and  dark  green  areas  very  clearly  defined.  Infection  was  produced 
from  both  plants  by  inoculation  into  healthy  plants.  The  causal  agent 
was  very  active  and  highly  infectious. 

Bliie  Cloth.  —  The  diseased  parts  of  three  plants  were  covered  with  blue 
cloth  hoods,  as  in  the  preceding  experiments,  for  a  period  of  twenty-five 
days.  The  covers  were  then  removed  and  a  careful  examination  of  the 
leaves  made.  On  plants  A-2  and  B-2  no  visible  symptoms  of  the  mosaic 
disease  could  be  observed,  although  a  slight  tendency  towards  curling  was 
noticeable  on  a  few  of  the  leaves.  The  leaves  were  all  uniformly  light 
green  in  color,  and  aside  from  this,  appeared  normal.  Plant  C-2,  however, 
showed  on  two  leaves  a  slight  mottling.  Two  weeks  after  the  hoods  were 
removed,  plants  A-2  and  B-2  did  not  show  any  marked  symptoms  of  the 
mosaic  disease  other  than  a  faint  mottling  of  a  few  leaves,  not  sufiicient, 
however,  to  seriously  injure  the  leaf.  Plant  C-2  developed  mosaic 
again  in  the  same  length  of  time,  but  not  as  seriously  as  before  the 
treatment.  It  may  be  that  the  mottling  on  A-2  and  B-2  was  due  to 
the  maturing  of  the  plant,  although  tliis  mottling  is  usually  distinctive 
enough  to  be  readily  differentiated  from  that  caused  by  the  mosaic 
disease. 

Healthy  plants  inoculated  with  the  juice  of  leaves  from  plants  A-2, 
B-2  and  C-2  contracted  the  disease  almost  without  exception.  Controls 
inoculated  with  boiled  juice  failed  to  develop  the  disease.  Table  V  gives 
the  results  of  the  inoculations. 

Table  V.  —  Results  of  Inoculations  ivith  Juice  from  Plants  groion  under 

Blue  Hoods. 


Plant  No. 


Number  of 
Healthy 

Plants  Inocu- 
lated with 
Juice  from 
Leaves  of 

Treated  Plant. 


Number  of 
Inoculated 
Plants  show- 
ing Mosaic  at 
End  of 
Eighteen 
Days. 


A-2. 
B-2, 
C-2, 


Controls  inoculated  with  boiled  juice,  6;  diseased  in  eighteen  days,  0. 
Controls  inoculated  with  sterile  distilled  water,  6;  diseased  in  eighteen  days,  1. 


MOSAIC   DISEASE   OF   TOBACCO.  95 

The  above  results  show  that  when  blue  light  is  used  there  is  a  suppres- 
sion of  leaf  color  variation  more  or  less  permanent  in  character,  the 
treated  plants,  with  one  exception,  showing  no  typical  symptoms  of  the 
disease  for  at  least  two  weeks  subsequent  to  the  removal  of  the  hoods. 
It  cannot  be  said,  however,  that  the  disease  was  controlled,  as  inoculation 
of  healthy  plants  with  the  juice  from  these  leaves  produced  the  disease 
in  nearly  every  case. 

The  causal  agent  of  the  disease  was  still  very  active  in  the  apparently 
normal  fully  recovered  leaves,  and  was  highly  infectious. 

Discussion  of  Results.  —  The  results  of  these  experiments  do  not  agree 
entirely  with  those  obtained  by  Lodewijks,  particularly  in  the  case  of 
action  of  the  blue  light,  inasmuch  as  the  plants  covered  with  the  blue 
hoods,  although  showing  an  apparent  recovery  from  the  mosaic,  still 
contained  the  causal  agent  of  the  disease,  and  by  inoculation  with  the 
juice  expressed  from  these  plants  into  healthy  plants  the  disease  was 
again  produced  in  practically  all  cases.  It  should  be  noted  that  the 
visible  symptoms  of  the  disease  were  suppressed,  the  reason  for  which 
may  be  as  AUard  (loc.  cit.)  suggests  in  his  work  on  the  mosaic  disease  of 
tobacco.  He  states,  with  respect  to  Lodewijks'  observations,  "If  the 
malady  in  question  was  true  infectious  mosaic  disease,  one  is  inclined  to 
believe  that  covering  the  young  plants  temporarily  reduced  the  color 
contrasts  of  the  mottled  areas.  These  changes  may  have  led  Lodewijks 
to  conclude  that  a  partial  or  a  complete  cure  had  been  effected  in  his 
experiments." 

It  might  be  inferred  from  the  above  that  on  the  removal  of  the  hoods 
exposing  the  plants  to  normal  daylight,  they  would  soon  regain  the  color 
contrast,  but  this  is  not  entirely  so  in  the  case  of  the  blue  light,  as  has 
been  shown.  The  apparent  recovery,  therefore,  is  not  entirely  the  result 
of  a  suppression  of  color  contrast  due  to  the  action  of  blue  light  on  the 
leaves  as  suggested  by  Allard,  but  is  undoubtedly  so  in  part. 

It  is  evident  that  the  treatment  of  plants  as  above  recorded  does  not 
destroy  the  causal  agent  of  the  mosaic  disease,  whatever  may  be  its  char- 
acter, the  treated  leaves  apparently  still  containing  the  causal  agent,  very 
probably  in  the  same  manner  as  do  the  parts  of  a  plant  which  do  not  show 
visible  symptoms  of  the  disease,  as  the  stem,  lower  leaves,  roots,  etc.,  the 
juice  of  which  is  often  highly  infectious.  It  would  appear  from  the  re- 
sults that  the  new  terminal  growth  subsequent  to  the  removal  of  the 
hoods  would  develop  the  trouble,  and  this  was  the  case  in  plant  C-2,  but 
not  apparently  so  with  plants  A-2  and  B-2.  Lodewijks'  opinion,  therefore, 
that  in  the  plant  a  "virus"  and  "anti- virus"  are  present,  and  that  certain 
abnormal  conditions  cause  the  "virus"  to  be  produced  in  excess,  bringing 
about  a  mosaicked  appearance,  while  if  the  "anti- virus"  is  produced  in 
excess,  immunity  is  secured,  will  hardly  hold,  as  it  is  clearly  shown  that 
even  after  apparent  cure  the  causal  agent  is  present  and  active. 

It  is  significant  to  note  that  under  the  influence  of  blue  light  both 
assimilation  and  starch  formation  are  decreased,  thus  bringing  about  a 


96         MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    175. 

partial  starvation,  as  it  were,  not,  however,  serious  enough  to  reduce 
greatly  the  total  starch  formation  and  assunilation  of  the  whole  plant; 
while  at  the  same  time  the  chlorophyll  production  is  very  little  changed 
if  a  comparison  of  the  color  of  the  normal  and  treated  leaves  can  be  taken 
a,s  a  basis  of  such  a  comparison.  This  latter  fact  has  already  been  noted 
by  Lodewijks  in  his  work  on  the  disease. 

It  is,  therefore,  indicated  by  the  results  obtained  in  the  preceding  ex- 
periments that  the  different  colors  have  Httle  or  no  effect  on  the  causal 
agent  of  the  disease,  but  in  the  case  of  the  blue  there  is  a  strong  depres- 
sion of  the  macroscopic  sjmiptoms  of  the  disease. 

Biochemical  Studies. 
Enzyme  Activities  in  Healthy  and  Diseased  Plants. 

The  study  of  enzymes  in  relation  to  diseases,  particular!}'  those  of  a 
so-called  physiological  nature  has  not  been  extensively  gone  into  as  yet 
by  investigators,  but  it  is  believed  that  a  study  of  their  activities  and 
reactions  should  be  made,  not  only  in  the  case  of  physiological  troubles, 
but  also  those  caused  by  fungi  and  bacteria,  as  it  is  the  writer's  firm  behef 
that  the  activities  of  a  large  number  of  the  fungi,  and  their  effects  on  the 
respective  hosts,  are  in  a  great  measure  due  to  the  action  of  either  exo- 
enzymes  or  endoenzymes  produced  by  the  fungi  concerned.  There  is  a 
possibility  that  the  future  may  show  a  great  advance  in  the  study  of 
host  resistance,  etc.,  when  the  conditions  under  which  enzyme  activity 
in  fungi  and  bacteria  takes  place  are  better  known,  and  plants  may  pos- 
sibly be  bred  to  a  condition  of  producmg  either  a  sap  in  wliich  these 
activities  cannot  take  place,  or  will  produce  anti-enzymes  which  will 
inhibit  the  activities  of  the  enzymes  contained  in  the  respective  fungi. 

Although  many  have  made  a  study  of  this  disease,  very  few  have  con- 
cerned themselves  mth  the  question  of  the  enzj-nne  activities;  among 
the  first  to  make  mention  of  this  phase  of  the  question  was  Woods  {loc.  cit.), 
who  found  that  the  enzymes  designated  as  peroxidases  were  at  least  dif- 
fusable,  and  occurred  apparently  in  larger  amount  in  diseased  leaves  than 
in  healthy  ones;  also  that  their  action  was  t\\dce  as  strong  in  the  light 
green  areas  as  in  the  darker  portions  of  the  leaf.  Koning  {loc.  cit.),  as  a 
result  of  his  investigations,  came  to  the  conclusion  that  the  disease  was 
caused  by  a  certain  enzyme,  which  he  stated  to  be  oxidase,  and  the  action 
of  which  he  described.  He  beUeved  that  it  was  formed  in  the  plant  under 
certain  conditions.  HeintzeP  also  found  oxidizing  enzymes  present  which 
were  more  active,  if  not  present  in  greater  amounts,  in  diseased  plants 
than  in  the  normal  plants.  Woods  later  (1902),  in  his  work  on  the  mosaic 
disease,  verified  Ixis  former  observation,  and  stated  further  that  the 
diastase  activity  was  much  inhibited  in  the  case  of  diseased  plants.  He 
attributed  the  lessened  diastase  activitj^  to  the  presence  of  excessive 

«  Heintzel,  K.:  Contagiose  Pflanzenkrankheiten  ohne  Microben  mit  besonderer  Beriicksichti- 
gung  der  Mosaikkrankheit  der  Tabaksblatter.  Erlangen,  46  p.,  1  pi.  (Inaugural  Dissertation) 
(1900). 


MOSAIC   DISEASE    OF   TOBACCO.  97 

amounts  of  oxidizing  enzymes,  and  showed  experimentally  that  diastatic 
action  is  inhibited  by  the  presence  of  oxidizing  enzjanes.  This  is  the 
only  work  that  has  been  accomplished  up  to  the  present  time,  so  far  as 
relates  to  a  study  of  the  enzyme  activities  involved  in  this  disease.  Only 
two  enzymes  have  been  considered,  namely,  the  oxidase  a,nd  diastase, 
and  it  should  be  stated  that  in  the  light  of  later  developments  in  the  de- 
termination and  estimation  of  enzyme  preparations  and  activities  the 
results  obtained  in  some  cases  might  well  be  open  to  some  criticism. 

Loew,^  while  working  with  tobacco,  discovered  the  presence  of  an 
enzyme  which  he  called  catalase,  but  he  made  no  observations  relative  to 
its  activities  in  the  case  of  mosaic-diseased  plants.  The  results  of  the 
writer's  studies  on  enzyme  activities  of  healthy  and  mosaic  plants  are 
detailed  below. 

Method.  —  In  the  experiments  here  detailed  the  enzymes  under  dis- 
cussion were  studied,  in  so  far  as  was  possible,  (1)  with  regard  to  their 
presence  or  absence  in  (a)  leaves,  (b)  seems  and  (c)  roots  of  healthy  and 
diseased  plants  (this  was  considered  necessary,  as  it  has  been  found  that, 
irrespective  of  the  parts  showing  visible  symptoms  of  the  disease,  the  sap 
from  all  other  parts  also  is  capable  of  transmitting  the  trouble);  (2)  with 
regard  to  the  age  of  the  plant;  (3)  with  regard  to  the  growth  of  the  plant 
under  different  conditions.  These  will  be  discussed  in  detail  under  their 
respective  sections. 

The  methods  employed  for  the  estimation  were  for  the  most  part  those 
which  by  experience  have  been  found  satisfactory,  and  in  the  main  give 
quantitative  results;  in  some  cases  the  results  are  more  or  less  qualitative 
in  nature,  owing  to  our  present  insufficient  knowledge  of  the  methods  of 
isolation  and  action  of  the  enzyme  involved. 

It  should  be  stated  that  plants  used  in  the  experiments  were  both  field 
and  greenhouse  grown,  but  no  essential  differences  in  results  were  obtained 
from  the  two  series.  The  individual  experiments  will  not  be  given  in 
detail,  but  as  the  determinations  of  any  given  series  were  made  in  every 
case  in  the  same  manner,  only  average  results  with  the  maximum  and 
minimum  readings  will  be  given.  The  experiments  are,  however,  described 
in  sufficient  detail  to  enable  those  interested  to  follow  the  methods  em- 
ployed closely  enough  to  check  up  the  work  of  the  writer. 

Catalase  (leaves) .  —  A  comparison  was  made  of  the  catalase  activity 
of  healthy  and  diseased  leaves,  as  it  had  been  noted  as  earlj''  as  1908  by 
the  writer  that  there  was  apparently  a  great  difference  between  the  cat- 
alase activity  of  healthy  and  mosaic-diseased  tomato  leaves,  and  later 
the  same  was  foimd  to  be  true  in  the  case  of  tobacco.  At  that  time  only 
rough  determinations  were  made,  but  since  then  the  writer  has  made 
hundreds  of  determinations,  the  results  of  wliich  have  borne  out  the  ob- 
servations made  then,  and  indisputably  established  the  fact  that  there  is 
a  wide  difference  in  the  catalase  activity  of  healthy  and  diseased  leaves. 

1  Loew,  O.:  Catalase:  A  New  Enzyme  of  General  Occurrence,  with  Special  Reference  to  the 
Tobacco  Plant.     U.  S.  D.  A.,  Bur.  Plant  Ind.,  Bui.  No.  68  (1901). 


98  MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    175. 

In  all  the  experiments  freshly  collected  material  was  used,  and  the 
determinations  made  almost  immediately  after  collection.  The  usual  pro- 
cedure was  as  follows :  — 

A  weighed  amount  of  leaf  was  ground  thoroughly  with  a  weighed 
amount  of  acid-washed  sand  and  a  certain  volume  of  double  distilled  water, 
and  the  whole  washed  into  the  apparatus  with  sufficient  double  distilled 
water  to  bring  the  volume  up  to  the  standard  volume  used  in  the  particu- 
lar series  in  question.  This,  of  course,  gave  to  each  flask  a  standard  con- 
stant dilution  value.  To  this  mixture  was  then  added  a  hke  volume  of 
1  per  cent,  solution  of  Merck's  perhydrol,  thus  making  the  H2O2  concen- 
tration of  the  total  mixture  .5  per  cent.  The  amount  of  oxygen  liberated 
in  ten  minutes  was  arbitrarily  taken  as  the  measure  of  enzyme  activity. 
Several  different  forms  of  apparatus  were  used,  but  for  large  amounts  of 
leaf  any  ordinary  water  displacement  method  was  fotmd  to  be  very  sat- 
isfactory. (Care  should  be  exercised  where  this  mode  of  analysis  is  used, 
to  take  into  account  the  absorption  of  oxygen  by  the  water.)  In  making 
determinations  where  the  amount  of  material  was  very  small,  the  ap- 
paratus designed  by  Lohnis  for  use  in  milk  examinations  was  found  to  be 
more  convenient.  Practically  all  determinations  were  made  at  tempera- 
tures ranging  from  17°  to  23°  C.  The  action  of  the  catalase  is  much 
accelerated  by  shaking,  as  pointed  out  by  Loew,  and  each  test  was  shaken 
imder  exactly  similar  conditions  in  all  the  determinations  made.  It  was 
found  necessary  to  use  this  method  for  the  determination  of  the  catalase 
activity,  as  any  method  involving  titration,  such  as  the  permanganate 
method,  was  unsatisfactory,  due  to  the  reaction  of  certain  constituents 
in  the  tissue  with  the  reagents. 

Table  VI.  shows  the  relative  amounts  of  oxygen  developed  in  normal 
tobacco  leaves,  and  it  is  to  be  noted  that  the  catalase  of  the  dark  green 
leaves  was  much  more  active  than  that  of  the  light  green  leaves.  This 
was  found  to  hold  true,  to  a  certain  ex-tent,  for  light  and  dark  green  leaves 
even  on  the  same  plant.  The  basal  leaves  of  older  plants,  which  in  some 
cases  were  almost  mature,  and  of  a  lighter  color  than  the  middle  and  upper 
leaves,  developed  in  every  case  relatively  less  oxygen.  This  was  partic- 
ularly true  in  the  case  of  Havana  tobacco.  Broadleaf  did  not  show  such 
a  wide  divergence,  but  it  should  also  be  stated  that  in  the  Broadleaf  plants 
employed  in  the  determinations  the  basal  leaves  did  not  show  any  great 
color  difference. 

As  will  be  noted,  some  of  these  experiments  were  made  with  plants 
grown  under  field  conditions,  but  a  greater  number  were  made  with 
plants  grown  in  the  greenhouse,  under  control  conditions. 


MOSAIC   DISEASE    OF   TOBACCO. 


99 


^   9, 

.SOU 


"^ 

O  «a 

o          II 

«> 

S2  --' 

OS 

^^ 

5 

C 

r- 

« 

o 

g 

>   a 

Eh    2 


!z;q 


C  BS 

w  a 

Q  H 
I-  ^ 

oo 


So 

o 


S 


Ul      i>       M       tSI      ^      ^ 


w^MWis^w:? 


—   .s 


p33pp3qq3 


^        U3       t^        <-■ 


^->      1-t      a> 


^H  t^  l-H  Ci 


U)       611       bO 


bO       bO       bO 


KWWfqmmWWK 


<inOQHfeCW'-i 


100       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    175. 

These  results  show  that  the  catalase  activity  varies  somewhat  even  in 
healthy  plants,  dependent  upon  age  and  also,  apparently,  on  the  general 
condition  of  the  plant.  It  shows  clearly,  also,  that  in  plants  of  approxi- 
matelj^  the  same  age  the  catalase  activity  varies  somewhat  between  plants 
with  dark  green  leaves  and  those  with  light  green  leaves. 

Even  on  the  same  plant  this  holds  true,  as  can  be  seen  from  the  results 
tabulated  below. 


Table  VII.  —  Catalase  Activity  of  Light  and  Dark  Leaves  from  Same  Plant. 

[Plants  nearly  mature;  procedure  as  in  Table  VI.] 


Plant  No. 


Number  of 
Determina- 
tions. 


Light  Leaves, 
Cubic  Centi- 
meters of 
Oxygen 
developed 
(Average). 


Dark  Leaves, 
Cubic  Centi- 
meters of 
Oxygen 
developed 
(Average). 


Bi, 

Xii, 
104, 

Al7t 


51.8 
62.0 
71.4 
58.1 


119.8 
125.5 
93.7 
79.3 


An  examination  and  determination  of  the  catalase  activity  in  diseased 
leaves  shows  that  the  amount  of  oxygen  developed  is  relatively  much  less 
than  in  the  case  of  healthy  leaves.  In  the  table  below  are  given  some  of 
the  results  obtained  from  diseased  leaves.  In  these  experiments  the  leaf 
tissue  was  used  without  reference  to  the  light  and  dark  areas  of  the  in- 
dividual leaf.  It  is  significant  that  the  activity  is  very  much  less  than  in 
healthy  leaves.  All  the  plants  used  in  this  series  were  badly  diseased.  It 
should  be  stated  that  in  apparently  mild  cases  of  the  disease  the  variation 
from  the  normal  catalase  content  was  not  so  great.  The  results  shown 
here  can  hardly  be  compared  with  those  given  in  Table  VII.,  as  the  plants 
were  not  in  some  cases  of  the  same  age,  nor  were  they  grown  at  the  same 
time. 

Table  VIII.  —  Catalase  Activity)  in  Diseased  Leaves. 

[Plants  badly  diseased;  procedure  as  in  Table  VI.] 


Plant  No. 


Number  of 
Determina- 
tions. 


Cubic  Centi- 
meters of 
Oxygen 
developed 
(Average). 


Pe. 
R. 
3a. 

Ax,        • 
Total, 


47.2 
32.8 
54.5 
69.6 


51.0 


MOSAIC   DISEASE   OF   TOBACCO. 


101 


In  the  next  table  will  be  found  a  comparison  of  the  results  of  catalase 
activity  in  healthy  and  diseased  leaves  from  plants  grown  at  the  same 
time  and  under  identical  conditions.  The  plants  were  inoculated  artificially 
in  as  uniform  a  manner  as  possible. 


Table  IX.  —  Catalase  Activity  in  Leaves  of  Healthy  and  Diseased  Plants 

of  Same  Age. 

[Procedure  as  in  Table  VI.] 


Leaves. 


Number  of 
Determina- 
tions. 


Cubic  Centi- 
meters of 
Oxygen 
developed 
(Average). 


Diseased, 
Healthy, 


52.3 
119.0 


The  values  here  obtained  simply  substantiate  those  given  in  preceding 
tables,  but  in  addition  allow  of  a  direct  comparison. 

The  leaf  tissue  was  used  in  the  preceding  experiments  without  regard 
to  the  light  and  dark  green  patches  on  the  individual  leaf. 

It  was  thought  that  an  examination  of  the  light  and  dark  green  areas 
of  individual  leaves  of  mosaicked  plants  might  give  a  clue  as  to  whether 
the  activities  of  the  catalase  were  inhibited  in  one  or  both  of  these  areas 
in  comparison  with  a  leaf  from  a  healthy  plant  of  approximately  the  same 
age  and  color. 

It  was  found  that  the  catalase  activity  of  the  dark  green  areas  ap- 
proached that  of  the  normal  leaf  of  the  same  color,  while  the  catalase 
activity  of  the  light  green  areas  was  much  below  normal,  even  in  the  case 
of  a  Hght  green  normal  leaf  being  used  for  comparison.  The  values 
obtained  are  given  in  Table  X. 

Table  X.  —  Catalase  Activity  in  Diseased  Leaves. 

[Comparison  of  light  and  dark  green  areas;  procedure  as  in  Table  VI.] 


Series. 

Number  of 
Determina- 
tions. 

Cubic  Centimeters  of  Oxy- 
gen DEVELOPED   (AvERAGE). 

Light. 

Dark. 

X 

0 

21, 

4 
3 

8 

42.1 
37.0 
54.3 

73.6 

95.4 
103.0 

Diastase.  —  It  is  a  well-known  fact  that  diastase  is  intimately  con- 
nected with  metabolism  in  the  leaf  in  practically  all  clilorophyll-bearing 
plants,  as  well  as  in  many  of  the  fungi,  and  the  relations  of  the  activities 


102       MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    175. 

of  diastase  in  the  mosaic  disease  are  of  rather  significant  import,  as  can 
be  easily  shown.  It  was  pointed  out  several  years  ago  by  Woods  (loc.  cit.) 
that  the  action  of  oxidizing  enzymes  when  present  in  solutions  containing 
diastase  tended  greatly,  under  ordinary  conditions,  to  inhibit  the  activities 
of  the  diastase.  Turning  more  particularly  to  the  mosaic  disease,  he  made 
the  observation  that  in  the  cells  of  the  light  green  areas,  although  they 
formed  starch  practically  in  a  normal  manner,  so  far  as  could  be  observed 
the  starch  was  not  translocated,  and  that  in  the  morning  there  was  prac- 
tically as  much  starch  present  as  at  night,  which  is  not  the  case  in  a 
normally  functioning  leaf.  In  this  case  it  was  found  that  practically  all 
the  starch  disappeared  in  the  night  and  was  translocated. 

Recently  there  has  been  more  or  less  contention  as  to  the  exact  method 
of  action  of  diastase  on  starch,  and  within  the  last  two  or  three  years 
important  investigations  have  resulted  in  the  opinion,  substantiated  more 
or  less  in  detail,  that  the  diastase  of  the  older  writers  is  not  one  enzjmae 
alone,  but  is  made  up  of  at  least  two  components.  The. first  of  these 
breaks  down  the  starches  into,  or  as  far  as,  the  erjiihro-dextrine  and 
achro-dextrine  stage,  the  second  component  taking  up  the  action  from 
this  point  and  completely  hydrolizing  the  starch  to  the  sugar  compoimds 
which  are  found  to  be  present,  as  the  next  step  in  the  process  of  metabolism. 

It  was  in  the  Ught  of  these  investigations  that  the  writer  took  up  the 
question  of  the  diastase  activity  in  the  mosaic  disease,  and  it  was  found 
to  be  less  active  in  the  leaves  which  showed  severe  symptoms  of  the 
disease  than  in  those  which  showed  only  a  slight  trace.  There  was,  how- 
ever, apparently  a  greater  or  less  breaking  down  of  the  starch  in  all  the 
leaves  examined,  so  far  as  could  be  determined  by  the  colorimetric  methods, 
which,  although  not  altogether  satisfactory,  may  be  relied  upon  as  much 
as  any  of  the  present-known  methods  of  determination.  At  the  morning 
examinations  the  starch  did  not  in  some  cases  take  on  the  color  of  the 
normal  starch  in  the  healthy  leaves,  but  was  accompanied  by  a  yellow 
brown  to  a  reddish  or  violet  coloration,  dependent  somewhat  on  the 
strength  of  the  indicator  used.  The  strength  of  the  iodine  solution  used 
in  this  case  was  a  fiftieth  normal  iodine-potassium  iodide  solution.  This 
reaction  would  indicate  that  the  starch  to  a  certain  extent  had  been  acted 
upon  at  least  partially  by  the  diastatic  enzymes,  and  would  indicate  also 
that  it  was  possibly  the  first  of  the  components  above  mentioned  which 
was  more  active,  and  that  the  second  was  more  or  less  inliibited  in  its 
action.  In  the  normal  leaf,  of  course,  there  was  a  certain  amount  of  starch 
present  indicated  by  the  blue  coloration  of  the  granules.  The  amount 
was  slight,  however,  compared  to  that  in  the  diseased  leaves,  and  in  no 
case  was  there  any  of  the  brown  or  violet  color,  almost  complete  hydrolysis 
having  apparently  taken  place  very  rapidly.  This  would  indicate,  as 
pointed  out  by  Woods,  that  the  oxidizing  enzymes,  of  wliich  we  will 
make  mention,  and  which  are  present  in  excessively  large  amounts  in  the 
diseased  areas  of  the  leaf,  do  play  an  important  role  in  the  controlling 
or  inhibiting  of  the  activities  of  the  diastatic  enzymes,  but  not  on  the 


MOSAIC   DISEASE   OF   TOBACCO.  103 

diastase  in  the  old  conception  of  the  term.  Rather  it  might  be  said 
the  action  is  on  the  primary  enzyme  concerned  in  diasta  ic  activity,  if  the 
newer  concept  of  diastatic  activity  above  advanced  is  true,  as  it  would 
seem  to  be  from  the  unpublished  investigations  of  Roessler  of  the  Uni- 
versity of  Prague,  who  was  able  to  separate  by  salting  out  from  a  very 
carefully  prepared  solution  of  the  ordinary  diastase  at  least  two  compo- 
nents having  the  respective  actions  above  mentioned.  In  no  case,  as 
indicated  by  the  color  reaction  obtained,  did  we  get  a  complete  hydrol- 
ysis of  a  large  amount  of  starch,  the  process  only  being  carried  on,  ap- 
parently, as  has  been  indicated,  —  as  far  as  the  erythro-dextrine  and 
achro-dextrine  stage.  It  was  attempted  in  our  experiments  to  isolate 
or  rather  separate  out  diastase  in  a  more  or  less  pure  form  from  the  leaves 
of  healthy  and  diseased  plants,  and  although  certain  results  were  obtained, 
it  was  rather  a  difficult  matter,  as  in  the  writer's  experience  it  has  been 
found  that  diastase  is  one  of  the  most  difficult  of  the  enzymes  to  purify 
to  any  extent.  The  protective  colloids,  etc.,  during  the  purification  are 
separated  away  from  the  enzyme  aggregate,  and  the  purer  ferment  be- 
comes less  active.  The  reason  for  this  cannot  be  very  well  explained  at 
the  present,  but  it  is  the  experience  of  all  investigators  with  diastase  that 
this  is  a  fact.  However,  results  were  obtained  which  seemed  to  indicate 
that  the  diseased  leaves  contain  relatively  less  "diastase"  than  do  the 
normal  healthy  leaves. 

Chlorophyllase.  —  This  enzyme  has  been  found  to  be  always  present 
with  chlorophyll  in  amounts  directly  proportional  to  the  amount  of 
chlorophjdl  present,  and  according  to  Willstatter  and  Stoll^  does  not 
bring  about  an  hydrolysis  but  an  "alcoholysis," 

RCOOCsoHsa  —  C2H5OH  .  RCOOC2HS  —  C20H39OH 

in  the  presence  of  ethyl  alcohol.  It  forms  the  alcohol  phytol,  CooHsgOH, 
from  the  radical  in  the  presence  of  ethyl  alcohol  and  not  water  only. 

Ver}^  httle  is  known  about  its  action  in  the  plant  cell,  and  although  the 
writer  was  able  to  demonstrate  its  presence  in  both  healthy  and  diseased 
leaves,  no  quantitative  data  were  secured  as  to  its  relative  activity  in 
healthy  and  diseased  tissue.  Until  better  methods  are  worked  out  for 
its  purification  and  rapid  determination  it  would  be  futile  to  hazard  an 
opinion  in  regard  to  its  specific  action  in  the  ceUs  of  healthy  and  diseased 
leaves. 

Oxidases  and  Peroxidases.  —  Woods  (loc.  cit.)  was  one  of  the  first  to 
observe  that  in  mosaic-diseased  leaves  the  oxidase  activity  was  greatly 
increased.  Since  then  it  has  been  found  that  in  the  curly  dwarf  disease 
of  the  potato  and  sugar  beet  the  oxidase  activity  is  greatly  increased  in 
the  diseased  leaves  as  compared  with  that  of  the  normal.  These  two 
diseases  have  been  for  the  most  part  regarded  as  physiological,  and  it  is 

1  Willstatter  and  Stoll:  Unt.  uber  Chlorophyll  XI  und  XIII.  tjber  Chlorophyllasa.  Liebig's 
Ann.  der  Chemie.,  378.  18  (1910);  380,  148  (1911). 


104       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    175. 

a  significant  fact  that  this  excessive  activity  of  oxidizing  enzymes  has 
been  more  frequently  noted  in  diseases  of  this  character  than  in  those 
which  are  caused  by  bacteria  or  fungi.  The  reaction  of  the  host  is  ap- 
parently different  in  the  latter  case. 

Bunzel^  has  noted  that  the  oxidase  acti\dty  varies  with  the  age  of  the 
plant  in  the  curly  dwarf  disease  of  potato,  reaching  its  greatest  activity 
when  the  plant  growth  ceases. 

The  writer  has  also  found  this  to  be  true  for  tobacco  to  a  certain  extent, 
and  always  met  with  greater  activities  of  the  oxidases  as  the  leaves  were 
approaching  maturity.  This  was  marked  in  the  case  of  normal  plants, 
but  not  so  much  in  the  case  of  diseased  leaves. 

In  the  writer's  examinations  of  healthy  and  diseased  tissue  not  only 
qualitative  colorimetric  methods  were  emploj^ed,  but  also  a  simplified 
Bunzel's  oxidase  apparatus  was  made  use  of.  This  has  been  found  to  be 
the  most  satisfactory  method  for  the  quantitative  estimation  of  oxidase 
activity.^ 

A  few  of  the  quantitative  results  obtained  are  given  in  Table  XT. 

Table  XI.  —  Oxidase  Activity  in  Normal  and  Mosaic  Sap. 

[Manometer  readings  in  centimeters  of  mercury.    Bunzel  apparatus  mod.] 


Experiment. 

Time  in 
Minutes. 

Normal. 

Diseased. 

0 

0 

0 

30 

—0.60 

—0.80 

A 

60 

—1.09 

—1.23 

, 

75 

—1.12 

—1.29 

120 

—1.22 

—1.43 

0 

0 

0 

30 

-0.32 

—0.50 

B, 

60 

—0.80 

—0.70 

75 

—1.02 

—0.96 

120 

—0.92 

-1.21 

0 

0 

0 

C 

30 

-0.51 

—0.46 

75 

-0.63 

—0.88 

100 

-0.70 

—0.91 

It  will  be  noticed  that  the  mosaic  sap  is  higher  in  total  and  average  in  every  instance. 


For  the  qualitative  determinations  the  usual  guaiac  test  was  employed. 
The  guaiac  test  for  oxidases  and  peroxidases  is  too  well  known  to  require 

»  Bunzel,  H.  H. :  Oxidases  in  Healthy  and  Curly  Dwarf  Potatoes.  Jour.  Agr.  Research,  Vol. 
II.,  5,  373^04  (1914). 

2  Bunzel,  H.  H.:  The  Measurement  of  the  Oxidase  Content  of  Plant  Juices.  U.  S.  D.  A.,  Bur. 
Plant  Ind.,  Bui.  No.  238  (1912). 


MOSAIC   DISEASE    OF   TOBACCO.  105 

an  extended  explanation.  The  results  obtained  by  this  method  in  every 
case  showed  the  diseased  leaves  to  contain  much  more  oxidases  than  the 
healthy  ones  of  the  same  age;  this  was  also  true  for  peroxidases,  but  here, 
of  course,  the  reaction  with  guaiac  was  somewhat  masked  owing  to  the 
presence  of  the  oxidases  and  their  reaction. 

In  examinations  of  the  roots  of  healthy  and  diseased  plants  the  same 
condition  was  observable;  there  was  always  an  excessive  activity  of  the 
oxidizing  enzyme  to  be  noted. 

In  going  over  the  results  of  the  experiments  with  the  enzymes  in  ques- 
tion, the  main  point  brought  to  the  attention  is  that  there  is  in  all  diseased 
plants  an  excessive  activity  of  the  oxidizing  enzymes,  and  a  corresponding 
decrease  in  the  activity  of  the  diastatic  enzjnnes  and  catalase.  This  at 
least  indicates  a  very  much  disturbed  equiUbrium  and  a  consequent 
derangement  of  normal  function  on  the  part  of  the  cells.  Naturally  the 
ones  most  affected  by  this  disturbance  are  the  dividing  or  meristematic 
ceUs,  as  these  are  the  cells  upon  which  the  plant  is  dependent  for  its  sub- 
sequent growth,  and  any  deviation  from  the  normal  is  more  Ukely  to  be 
indicated  in  the  development  of  these  ceUs  than  in  those  of  the  other 
parts  of  the  plant.  Any  change  in  function  induced  here  will  leave  its 
imprint  to  a  greater  or  less  extent  on  the  cell  during  its  subsequent  exist- 
ence, hence  the  pecuUar  manifestations  of  the  disease  in  the  leaves. 

It  is  true  that  plants  attacked  by  parasites  sometimes  show  an  exces- 
sive activity  on  the  part  of  certain  enzymes,  but,  as  a  rule,  the  disturb- 
ance is  more  local  in  its  nature.  It  is  also  a  fact  that  malnutrition,  such 
as  partial  starvation,  drought,  etc.,  will  bring  about  an  excessive  produc- 
tion or  activity  of  the  oxidizing  enzj^mes  in  particular,  as  has  been  pointed 
out  by  Bunzel,  of  general  distribution  throughout  the  plant;  but  this, 
except  in  cases  of  maturing  plants,  changes  upon  restoration  of  normal 
conditions,  and  tends  to  become  normal. 


Reaction  of  Mosaic  Sap  with  Various  Substances. 

We  have  seen  that  the  enzymatic  activities  of  the  plant  are  very  much 
disturbed  in  disease;  also  that  it  has  been  impossible  to  demonstrate  the 
presence  of  any  forms  of  bacteria  or  fungi  either  in  the  tissues  themselves 
or  in  the  expressed  juice. 

It  is  a  fact,  as  shown  by  practically  all  investigations,  that  the  disease 
is  very  infectious.  This  fact  alone  in  the  minds  of  many  is  sufficient  to 
place  the  causative  agent  among  the  parasitic  organisms.  The  field, 
however,  is  limited  to  that  class  of  organisms  designated  as  "ultramicro- 
scopic"  organisms,  about  which  very  little  is  known,  and  in  the  case  of 
plant  diseases  not  even  a  semblance  of  the  demonstration  of  the  activities 
of  such  organisms  has  been  made. 

Owing  to  the  fact  that  the  enzyme  activities  are  much  changed,  as  has 
been  demonstrated  in  the  preceding  pages,  and  also  to  the  fact  that  not 
only  the  activities  of  the  oxidizing  enzymes  are  changed,  but  also  the 


106       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    175. 

activities  of  others;  it  was  believed  by  the  writer,  with  Woods  and  others, 
that  the  disease  might  be  physiological  in  nature,  particularly  in  so  far 
as  the  causal  agent,  not  being  a  living  organism  in  the  ordinary  conception 
of  the  word,  was  concerned. 

So  httle  is  known  about  the  action  of  the  so-called  ultramicroscopic 
organisms  that  it  is  an  open  question  in  the  writer's  mind  whether  this 
division  should  be  the  dumping  ground  for  all  infectious  diseases  about 
the  etiology  of  which  Uttle  or  nothing  is  loiown. 

It  is  conceivable  that  other  causes,  not  organic  in  nature,  may  be  able 
to  produce  the  manifestations  of  parasitism.  Under  this  type  of  infection 
would  be  included  infectious  diseases  caused  by  enzjnues  or  the  resultant 
product  of  the  activities  of  a  group  of  enzj-mes. 

Certain  reactions  of  the  juice  from  diseased  plants  tend  to  confirm  this 
view,  and  in  the  following  pages  are  given  the  results  obtained  by  the 
writer  and  other  investigators  relating  to  the  reactions  of  these  juices 
with  various  reagents. 

Drying.  —  It  has  been  shown  by  various  investigators  that  the  dried 
leaves  of  the  mosaic-diseased  plants  retain  their  infectious  quaUties  for 
a  long  time.  Beijerinck  and  Allard  found  that  diseased  leaves  were  capa- 
ble of  causing  infection  after  being  dried  for  periods  of  two  years  and 
eighteen  months,  respectively.  The  writer  has  used  material  three  years 
old,  and  obtained  infection  in  a  great  majority  of  cases.  The  results 
obtained  are  given  below. 


Table  XII.  —  Air-dried  Mosaic  Leaves,  fineUj  ground  and  macerated  with 
Cold,  Distilled  Water. 

[Leaves  (herbarium  specimens)  three  years  old.] 


Number  of 

Plants 
inoculated. 

Point  of  Inoculation. 

Number  of 

Plants 

infected. 

Per  Cent. 
Infection. 

10 
12 
7 
13 

Below  terminal  leaflets,          .... 

Main  stem  near  base 

Midribs  of  a  basal  leaf, 

Midribs  of  a  basal  leaf, 

10 
11 
.6 
12 

100 
91 
86 
90 

Filtration.  —  The  use  of  various  filters  such  as  the  Chamberland, 
Berkefeld  and  Kitasato  types,  as  a  means  for  the  separation  of  bacteria 
and  other  organisms  in  a  fluid,  has  been  widely  adopted  in  recent  years, 
and  more  recently  filters  possessing  different  sized  pores  have  been  used 
for  differential  diagnostic  purposes  in  work  on  the  so-called  "ultramicro- 
scopic" organisms,  enzjTnes  and  toxins.  While  these  methods  are  without 
doubt  of  importance,  it  should  always  be  borne  in  mind  that  to  obtain 
true  filtration  effects  comparatively  large  volumes  of  the  fluid  should 


MOSAIC   DISEASE    OF   TOBACCO.  107 

be  used,  otherwise  there  is  a  strong  possibility,  particularly  in  the  case 
of  enzymes,  that  instead  of  a  filtration  occurring  at  once,  a  large  amount 
of  certain  constituents  may  be  adsorbed  (dependent  on  the  nature  of 
the  filter),  and  that  true  filtration  may  not  take  place  until  compara- 
tively large  amounts  have  been  drawn  through  the  filter.  The  writer 
has  noted  this  particularly  in  work  with  enzymes,  many  of  which  are 
strongly  adsorbed  by  various  substances.  Aside  from  the  "ultramicro- 
scopic"  organisms,  however,  the  bacteria  cannot  pass  through  many 
of  these  filters. 

With  reference  to  the  causal  agent  in  mosaic  sap  it  has  been  found  that 
it  passes  through  both  the  Chamberland  and  Berkefeld  filters,  and  even 
the  finer  grade  of  Berkefeld  filter  allows  the  passage  of  the  causal  agent. 
Beijerinck  (loc.  cit.)  showed  that  the  juice  was  still  infectious  after  being 
passed  through  the  Chamberland  filter,  and  Allard  {loc.  cit.)  and  Chnton 
{loc.  cit.)  have  both  shown  that  the  juice  was  infectious  after  passage 
through  the  Berkefeld  (normal)  filter.  The  results  obtained  by  the 
writer  agree  with  these  observations,  and  also  the  juice  was  found  to  be 
infectious  after  passing  it  through  the  fine  Berkefeld  candle.  The  Kitasato 
filter  was  also  used,  and  here  positive  infection  was  also  obtained,  although 
the  percentage  was  small.  The  writer  attempted  to  repeat  these  experi- 
ments with  the  Kitasato  filter  during  the  past  year,  but  was  unable  to 
obtain  the  filter.  In  all  cases  relatively  large  amounts  of  the  sap  were 
used  after  filtration  through  paper. 

The  average  percentage  of  infection  obtained  with  each  filter  in  the 
writer's  experiments  was  as  follows :  — 

Per  Cent. 
Chamberland  (average  of  3  examinations,  1911),  .  .  .  .  .91.0 

Berkefeld  (normal;  average  of  5  examinations,  1911),  ....  63.0 

Berkefeld  (fine;  one  test  only,  1914) 47.0 

Kitasato  (average  of  2  examinations,  not  dated) ,  .  .  .  .  .  40 . 5 

The  work  with  the  fine  grade  of  Berkefeld  and  Kitasato  filters  should 
be  repeated,  but  there  are  suflacient  indications  to  warrant  the  insertion 
of  these  results  at  this  time. 

Resistance  to  Antiseptics.  —  The  writer  has  at  various  limes  treated 
filtered  and  unfiltered  juice  with  many  of  the  antiseptics  such  as  are 
commonly  used  to  prevent  bacterial  action. 

The  following  table  contains  the  data  and  results  obtained  in  one 
typical  series  of  experiments  of  this  character:  — 


108       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    175. 


Table  XIII. 


Antiseptic. 

Amount  of 

Sap  used 

(Cubic 

Centimeters). 

Period  of 
Treatment. 

Infection. 

Toluol  (2  c.  c.) 

10 

2  months. 

++ 

Toluol  (2  c.  c), 

10 

4  months. 

++ 

Chloroform  (saturated  at  beginning),     . 

10 

2  months. 

++ 

Chloroform  (in  excess) 

10 

2  months. 

- 

Chloroform  (saturated  at  beginning),      . 

10 

4  months. 

+ 

Chloroform  (in  excess), 

10 

3  days. 

-+ 

Thymol  (2  per  cent.), 

10 

2  months. 

+ 

Thymol  (2  percent.), 

10 

4  months. 

+ 

Ether  (saturated), 

10 

2  months. 

+ 

Ether  (saturated), 

10 

4  months. 

+ 

Formaldehyde  (1-4  H2O,  1  c.  c.  added), 

10 

2  months. 

- 

Formaldehyde  (1-4  H2O,  1  c.  c.  added),  . 

10 

10  days. 

- 

Carbolic  acid  (5  per  cent.,  10  c.  c.  added). 

10 

2  days. 

- 

Chloralhydrate  (H  nioL),         .... 

10 

2  days. 

- 

Chloralhydrate  (H  mol.),         .... 

10 

20  hours. 

— 

-|-+=very  infectious. 
+=infectious  (over  40  per  cent.). 


— +=one  or  two  cases  of  infection,  possibly  accidental. 
— =no  infection. 


From  the  preceding  table  it  may  be  seen  that  the  sap  containing  the 
causal  agent  of  the  disease  varies  greath^  in  its  reaction  to  so-called  anti- 
septics and  other  compounds.  The  writer^  has  already  pointed  out  in  a 
previous  publication  that  the  influence  of  certain  capillary  active  sub- 
stances on  enzymes  is  very  variable,  aside  from  the  specific  toxic  quahties 
of  certain  of  these  substances.  In  comparing  the  reaction  of  the  sap  con- 
taining the  causal  agent  to  certain  of  these  compounds  we  find  that  there 
is  a  similarity  of  reaction  to  that  shown  by  the  enzjmies.  In  the  paper 
above  cited  it  was  shown  that  those  compounds  which  changed  the  sur- 
face tension  had,  as  a  rule,  dependent  on  their  physical  properties  (hydro- 
colloidal  or  lipocolloidal),  a  certain  definite  effect  on  enzyme  activities. 

Taking  up  the  discussion  of  the  results  in  detail  we  find  in  toluol  a 
compound  which  is  not  soluble  in  water  to  any  great  extent,  and  hence, 
behaving  like  a  lipocolloid,  having  no  effect  on  the  action  of  the  causal 
agent  contained  in  the  sap.  Toluol,  as  a  rule,  has  a  more  or  less  definite 
inhibitory  action  on  living  organisms. 

Chloroform,  when  present  in  the  sap  not  to  exceed  saturation,  behaves 
also  like  a  lipocolloid,  as  it  is  only  very  slightly  soluble  in  the  water,  and 

1  Chapman,  George  H.:  The  influence  of  Certain  Capillary-Active  Substances  on  Enzyme 
Activity.    Internat.  Zeitschrift  fiir  Physik.-chem.  Biologic.,  I  Band,  5  u.  6  Heft  (1914). 


MOSAIC   DISEASE    OF   TOBACCO.  109 

we  find  in  this  case  that  the  activity  of  the  agent  is  not  destroj^ed.  Chloro- 
form in  excess,  however,  does  destroy  apparently  the  causal  agent  of  the 
disease.  It  is  noteworthy  that  this  action  of  cliloroform  exactly  parallels 
that  found  to  be  the  case  with  enzjones. 

Th^Tnol,  when  used  in  2  per  cent,  concentration  is  very  often  used  as  a 
preventive  to  bacterial  action,  and  also  prevents  the  growth  of  fungi. 
We  find,  however,  that  when  it  is  present  in  concentration  not  exceeding 
2  per  cent,  in  the  sap  the  causal  agent  still  possesses  its  infectious  qualities 
for  some  time. 

Ether  is  a  substance  which,  like  chloroform,  has  lipoid-hke  properties, 
but  which  has  a  definite  action  on  the  surface  tension,  lowering  it  con- 
siderably. Sap  containing  ether  to  the  saturation  point,  which  lowers  the 
surface  tension  from  1  to  about  .619,  was  still  infectious  four  months 
after  treatment,  although  the  percentage  of  infection  was  much  decreased. 

A  solution  of  the  sap  containing  approximately  .8  per  cent,  of  actual 
formaldehyde  was  very  injurious,  and  at  the  end  of  two  months  no  infec- 
tion was  obtained.  At  the  end  of  ten  days  in  one  experiment,  however, 
plants  were  inoculated  and  two  cases  of  mosaic  disease  developed  from  a 
series  of  eight  plants,  but  it  is  believed  that  this  may  possibly  have  been 
an  accidental  infection,  as  in  no  other  instance  was  infection  obtained. 
In  formaldehyde,  however,  we  have  a  compound  which  has  a  specific 
narcotic  action  on  certain  enzymes  aside  from  its  surface  activities. 

Where  carbolic  acid  was  added  to  a  solution  of  the  sap  the  active  prin- 
ciple was  apparently  destroyed. 

In  chloralhydrate  we  have  a  substance  very  soluble  in  water,  but  not 
possessing  any  relatively  great  surface  activity.  It  has,  however,  a  specific 
toxic  action  on  the  causal  agent  of  the  disease,  and  even  after  twenty 
hours  no  infection  was  obtained.  These  results  with  chloralhydrate  are 
in  complete  accord  with  those  obtained  in  the  enzyme  work  previously 
mentioned. 

Most  of  the  substances  used  in  the  above  experiments  possess  a  very 
definite  toxic  action  to  all  organisms,  particularly  bacteria  and  fungi. 
As  to  their  effect  on  the  so-caUed  ultramicroscopic  organisms  the  writer  is 
unable  to  state,  not  having  had  the  opportunity  of  working  with  so-caUed 
cultures  of  these  organisms.  The  paralleHsms  between  the  surface-ten- 
sion effects  of  these  substances  on  enzymes  and  on  the  sap  containing 
the  active  principle  of  the  mosaic  disease  are  very  striking. 

Having  shown  that  the  causal  agent  is  not  bacterial  or  fungous  in 
character,  we  must  eliminate  for  the  present  the  supposition  of  the  presence 
of  a  toxin  or  virus  in  the  pathologist's  conception  of  these  terms,  as  it  is 
usual  to  conceive  of  these  substances  as  being  either  the  product  of  an 
organism  or  the  activity  manifested  by  the  organism  itself.  As  to  the 
production  of  toxins  and  viruses  by  the  so-called  ultramicroscopic  organ- 
isms Httle  is  known.  Noguchi  was  the  first  to  apparently  demonstrate 
that  such  organisms  do  exist,  and  was  able  to  cultivate  an  organism 
obtained  from  the  brain  of  patients  suffering  from  infantile  paralysis. 


110       MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    175. 

However,  these  organisms  were  always  mixed  with  certain  bodies  probably 
of  a  protein  nature,  and  Noguchi,  himself,  so  far  has  been  unable  to  state 
absolutely  which  may  be  the  active  agent,  although  he  naturally  infers 
from  his  inoculation  experiments  that  the  organisms  found  must  be  the 
causative  agent  owing  to  the  extreme  infectious  character  of  the  disease. 
He,  however,  states  that  it  is  not  absolutely  clear  to  him  whether  the 
organism  alone  or  a  combination  of  this  organism  with  the  bodies  found 
in  culture  associated  with  it  are  capable  of  producing  infection.  He 
does  state,  however,  that  in  the  case  of  animal  pathology  no  such 
symbiotic  relationship  has  so  far  been  observed.  From  the  character  of 
his  statement,  however,  it  is  clearly  indicated  that  he  does  not  preclude 
the  possibihty  of  such  a  condition  arising. 

Probable  Character  of  the  Causal  Agent. 

The  question  as  to  the  exact  character  of  the  causal  agent  of  mosaic 
disease  has  been  an  extremely  interesting  one  to  investigators,  and  studies 
on  this  phase  of  the  problem  have  narrowed  the  field  by  the  eUmination 
from  consideration  of  fungi  and  bacteria,  as  has  previously  been  shown 
not  only  in  this  work,  but  also  by  many  other  investigators.  This  also 
precludes  the  presence  of  a  virus  or  a  toxin  resultant  from  the  activities 
of  such  organisms. 

This  leaves,  then,  for  consideration  as  the  causal  agent  an  "ultrami- 
croscopic"  or  "invisible"  organism  and  the  enzjonic  activities  in  their 
fullest  conception.  The  reactions  of  the  so-called  "ultramicroscopic" 
organisms  are  little  known  at  present,  and  about  the  only  grounds  for 
admitting  of  such  a  class  of  organisms  is  the  infection  factor,  and  possibly 
reproduction  to  a  certain  extent.  We  do  know,  however,  many  reactions 
of  the  class  of  substances  called  enzjones  and  toxins,  but  fundamentally 
the  differentiation  of  the  three  above  mentioned  is  difficult,  and  is  per- 
haps in  many  cases  impossible.  Working  with  filtered  sap  from  mosaic- 
diseased  plants,  we  get  the  following  results  in  comparison  with  reactions 
of  some  of  the  so-called  "ultramicroscopic"  organisms  and  toxins. 

Temperature.  —  The  sap  containing  the  causal  agent  of  mosaic  disease 
becomes  non-infectious;  in  other  words,  becomes  inactive  when  heated 
to  about  80°  C.  for  a  short  time.  It  is  reported  that  ultramicroscopic 
organisms  and  toxins  are  killed  or  rendered  inactive,  respectively,  by 
exposure  to  heat  for  any  length  of  time  at  temperatures  somewhat  below 
100°  C.  Enzymes  are  also  rendered  inactive  at  temperatures  somewhat 
below  100°  C.  All  three  react  practically  alike  as  regards  temperature. 
The  causal  agent  in  mosaic  sap,  as  maj^  be  seen,  is  also  rendered  inactive 
at  temperatures  below  100°  C. 

Size.  —  As  to  size,  nothing  can  be  definitely  stated,  but  it  is  a  fact  that 
the  ultramicroscopic  organisms,  enzj^mes  and  toxins  must  have  a  diameter 
of  less  than  .1  //,  otherwise  they  would  become  visible  under  the  higher 
powers  of  the  microscope.  In  no  case  has  it  been  possible  to  demonstrate 
the  presence  of  organisms  under  even  the  highest  powers  available. 


MOSAIC   DISEASE    OF   TOBACCO.  Ill 

Reaction  to  Antiseptics.  —  It  is  stated  that  the  ultramicroscopic  organ- 
isms are  not,  to  any  extent,  affected  by  the  ordinary  antiseptics,  and  the 
same  is  true  for  toxins  in  general.  On  the  other  hand,  enzymes  and  their 
activities  are  very  strongly  affected  by  the  substances  usually  made  use 
of  as  antiseptics,  and  this  is  found  to  be  true,  with  one  or  two  possible 
exceptions,  in  the  case  of  mosaic  sap.  It  has  been  shown  that  formalin, 
carbolic  acid,  chloralhydrate,  and  even  chloroform  in  excess,  will  inhibit 
the  activities  of  the  causal  agent  in  mosaic  sap,  while,  on  the  other  hand, 
such  substances  as  ether,  toluol,  thymol  and  chloroform  in  dilution  have 
little  or  no  effect.  While  all  three  classes  are  to  a  certain  extent  affected 
by  antiseptics  in  general,  the  enzyme  group  is  most  strongly  affected,  and 
in  the  case  of  the  mosaic  we  find  this  reaction;  also,  as  has  been  pointed 
out,  the  effect  of  substances  possessing  marked  surface-active  properties 
is,  in  the  case  of  mosaic  sap,  quite  analogous  to  that  of  these  substances 
on  enzymes.  It  had  been  hoped  to  carry  on  more  detailed  work  on  this 
point,  but  as  yet  no  opportunity  has  offered  to  take  up  this  phase  of  the 
matter.  AUard^  has  studied  the  effects  of  alcohol,  ether  and  other  sub- 
stances on  mosaic  sap,  and  an  interpretation  of  his  results,  with  particu- 
lar reference  to  the  surface-active  properties  of  the  substances  under  con- 
sideration by  him,  parallel  the  author's  findings  in  the  case  of  enzymes  to 
a  marked  degree.  It  is  believed  that  more  work  of  this  character  might 
throw  considerable  light  on  this  matter. 

Activity.  —  So  far  as  can  be  judged  from  laboratory  results  the  activity 
of  the  causal  agent  in  mosaic  sap  is  continuous,  and  as  this  holds  true  not 
only  for  organisms  but,  within  limits,  for  enzymes  and  toxins  as  well 
this  property  cannot  be  made  use  of  for  differential  purposes. 

"Koch's  Laws"  or  "Postulates,"  so  called,  are  followed  by  all  three  of 
the  classes  under  consideration,  and  the  same  is  true  in  the  case  of  mosaic 
disease;  the  causal  agent  obeys  these  laws,  and  might  well  be  placed  in 
any  one  of  the  classes  so  far  as  this  property  is  concerned. 

The  Kitasato  filter  has  been  used  by  some  as  a  means  of  separation  of 
"ultramicroscopic"  organisms  from  enzymes  and  toxins,  and  although 
the  arbitrary  use  of  any  one  filter  as  a  standard,  unless  the  size  of  pores, 
adsorption  properties,  thickness  of  walls,  etc.,  are  carefully  taken  into 
consideration,  may  be  open  to  question,  this  procedure  has  been  followed 
in  some  instances  in  animal  pathology,  and  it  has  been  found  that  the 
Kitasato  filter  held  back  the  organisms  and  that  no  infection  could  be 
obtained  from  the  filtrate.  In  the  case  of  the  mosaic  disease,  however,  we 
find  that  apparently,  as  has  been  previously  indicated  in  this  paper, 
where  large  volumes  are  used,  the  causal  agent  passes  through  the  Kitasato 
filter,  and  we  do  get  infection  from  the  filtrate. 

The  disease  is  infectious,  but  whether  the  infection  may  be  indefinitely 
transferred  through  several  plants  with  undiminished  virulence  is  open 
to  question.    On  some  varieties  of  tobacco  this  does  not  apparently  take 

1  Allard,  H.  A.:  Some  properties  of  the  virus  of  the  mosaic  disease  of  tobacco.  Journal  Agr. 
Research,  Vol.  VI.,  No.  17  (July,  1916). 


112       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    175. 

place,  but  so  far  as  the  writer's  observations  go  the  virulence  of  the 
causal  agent  is  not  lessened  appreciably.  This  property  is  one  of  the 
strongest  points  advanced  by  those  favoring  the  theory  of  the  presence 
of  a  definitely  organized  parasite  as  the  causal  agent  of  the  disease.  It 
is,  however,  entirely  possible  that  enzymes  or  similar  substances  intro- 
duced into  a  plant  even  in  extremely  small  quantities,  are  capable  of 
regeneration  of  a  certain  kind,  and  indeed  it  is  held  by  some  that  enzymes 
do  grow  and  even  reproduce  themselves  under  certain  conditions.  The 
difficulties  encountered  in  the  study  of  this  phase  of  enzyme  work  are 
very  great,  however,  and  it  is  questionable  if  such  statements  can  be  as 
yet  definitely  accepted. 

Organisms,  even  of  the  ultramicroscopic  class,  in  their  reactions  would 
not  follow  the  law  of  proportionaUty,  but  in  the  case  of  mosaic  sap  and 
its  reactions  we  find,  by  measuring  the  relative  activities  and  reactions 
of  the  enzjTnes  present  that  apparently  a  proportionality  of  reaction  for 
any  one  lot  of  sap  does  hold.  The  writer  has  very  often  found  in  the 
measurement  of  the  activities  of  the  catalase  and  oxidase  particularly 
that  not  only  a  fairly  definite  relation  exists  between  the  various  enzjTnes, 
but  that  reaction  of  any  one  is  dependent  on  the  amount  of  sap  used. 
Of  course,  here  we  are  deaUng  with  a  mixture,  and  it  may  be  open  to 
question  if  the  measurement  of  the  enzjone  activities  is  a  true  measure 
of  the  activities  of  the  causal  agent. 

The  whole  subject  of  the  differential  diagnosis  of  enzymes,  toxins  and 
ultramicroscopic  organisms  is  an  extremely  difficult  one,  and  no  sharpl}'' 
dividing  lines  can  properly  be  drawn  between  them.  It  would  appear  to 
the  writer  that  in  some  cases,  at  least,  it  is  entirely  dependent  on  the  view- 
point and  interpretation  of  the  investigator  as  to  the  class  to  which  certain 
diseases  should  properly  be  ascribed. 

The  factors  of  reproduction  and  infection,  as  ordinarily  understood, 
have  proved  a  stumbling  block  to  the  acceptance  of  the  idea  that  there 
may  be  other  forms  of  matter  aside  from  organisms  capable  of  reproducing 
a  disease,  but  there  is  in  reality  very  little  real  ground  for  taking  this 
attitude.  In  the  case  of  the  mosaic  disease  there  are  certainly  many  reac- 
tions which  will  not  allow  of  placing  the  causal  agent  in  the  class  of  ultra- 
microscopic organisms.  The  general  distribution  of  the  causal  agent  in 
a  diseased  plant,  its  exceedingly  localized  action  on  the  meristematic 
tissues,  this  action  being  apparently  confined  to  the  nascent  chlorophyll, 
the  non-uniformity  of  response  to  apparently  favorable  conditions  during 
any  one  season  even  on  one  field,  and  also  its  individualism  as  shown  by 
plants  growing  together  (one  often  diseased  and  the  other  not)  are  to  the 
wi'iter  indicative  of  something  of  a  different  character. 

It  is  also  possible  that  in  the  search  after  the  infinitesimal  the  fact 
that  a  highly  organized  plant  as  a  whole  may  react  in  the  same  manner 
as  some  of  the  simpler  organisms  has  been  overlooked.  It  is  as  a  rule  not 
the  presence  of  an  organism  alone  which  is  responsible  for  the  manifesta- 
tions of  disease,  but  the  products  of  the  metabolism  of  the  organism. 


MOSAIC   DISEASE   OF   TOBACCO.  113 

If  the  metabolic  processes  are  changed  ever  so  sHghtly,  due  to  any  stunu- 
lus,  far-reaching  effects  may  be  induced  throughout  the  organism,  and 
this  we  find  to  be  the  case  in  the  mosaic  disease,  and  the  writer  beUeves 
that  it  is  justifiable  to  look  upon  the  matter  in  this  light,  as  it  is  no  more 
h}T)othetical  than  the  concept  of  an  "ultramicroscopic"  parasite,  which, 
if  demonstrated  (and  no  amount  of  concentration  or  methods  of  culture 
have  indicated  in  any  way  the  presence  of  aggregates  or  colonies),  certainly 
would  become  visible  if  multiplication  occurred. 

Theoretically  is  it  possible  to  conceive  of  an  organism,  functioning  as 
such,  to  be  made  up  of  so  few  molecules  of  protein,  fat  and  carbohydrate 
that  it  would  be  impossible  to  demonstrate  its  presence?  If  so,  our  ideas 
of  relative  size  of  molecules  of  protein,  etc.,  must  be  changed. 

Prevention  and  Control. 

The  question  of  the  prevention  and  control  of  mosaic  disease  is  of  prime 
importance  to  the  grower,  entirely  aside  from  more  technical  considera- 
tions as  to  the  exact  cause  or  causes  of  the  disease,  and  it  is  believed  that 
with  reasonable  care  it  is  possible  for  the  grower  to  lessen  materially  the 
amount  of  mosaic  in  the  field. 

Many  recommendations  have  been  made  regarding  treatment  of  dis- 
eased plants  after  they  have  once  contracted  the  disease,  but  so  far  the 
writer  has  never  observed  a  plant  which,  once  attacked  by  the  disease, 
recovered  at  any  subsequent  period  of  its  growth.  On  the  other  hand, 
it  has  never  been  observed  that  the  disease  killed  a  plant,  at  least  in  this 
region. 

It  is  doubtful,  owing  to  the  character  of  the  disease,  if  it  can  ever  be 
entirely  eliminated  on  some  soils  and  under  certain  unfavorable  conditions 
occurring  during  some  seasons.  As  has  been  indicated  previously  there  is 
apparently  Uttle  or  no  relation  to  be  found  between  excess  or  lack  of  food 
materials  and  the  prevalence  of  the  mosaic.  It  has  been  in  some  instances 
stated  that  favorable  results  have  been  obtained  from  the  use  of  lime  in 
different  forms,  but  this  treatment  cannot  be  recommended  for  various 
reasons.  Experimentally  it  has  been  shown  that  heavy  liming  has  little 
or  no  effect  on  the  disease  once  a  plant  has  contracted  the  disease,  and 
even  when  applied  to  soils  from  old  beds  no  consistently  favorable  results 
have  been  obtained  (see  page  91).  Used  in  the  larger  quantities  it  might 
be  inferred  from  the  results  that  the  lime  apparently  did  exert  a  beneficial 
action,  but  to  apply  Hme  generally  in  such  amounts  would  be  folly,  as 
it  would  in  many  cases  bring  the  soil  to  a  comparatively  neutral  or  alka- 
hne  condition,  which  reaction  would  favor  the  development  of  root  rot, 
caused  by  the  fungus,  Thielavia,  and  this,  once  thoroughly  established, 
in  a  field  or  seed  bed,  is  much  more  injurious  to  tobacco  than  is  the  mosaic 
disease. 

As  has  been  pointed  out,  the  writer,  from  his  observations,  is  strongly 
of  the  opinion  that  much  of  the  field  infection  may  be  traced  to  the  seed 


114       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    175. 

bed,  and  as  a  rule  those  beds  which  have  long  been  used  or  carelessly 
handled  are  found  to  be  producers  of  mosaicked  seedlings  in  far  larger 
numbers  than  are  found  on  new  beds  or  on  beds  which  have  been  carefully 
steriUzed  either  by  steam  or  formalin. 

It  has  been  found  that  the  soils  of  old  beds  do  tend  to  produce  more 
mosaicked  plants  than  do  those  of  new  beds,  although  it  may  be  possible 
that  under  field  conditions  the  differences  in  amount  during  different 
seasons  may  vary.  Soils  brought  into  the  greenhouse  gave  the  following 
results: — 


Table  XIV.  —  Experiments  with  Soils  from  Old  and  New  Beds. 

[Seedlings  transplanted  in  sterilized  soil.] 


Soil. 


Number  of 

Seedlings 

transplanted. 


Number 
Diseased  Four 
Weeks  after 
Trans- 
planting. 


Diseased 
(Per  Cent.). 


SoU  A  (old  bed), 
Soa21  (old  bed). 
SoU  la,      . 
Soil  B  (new  bed), 
Soil  C  (new  bed), 


60 
43 
50 
30 
49 


75.0 
40.0 
40.0 
10.0 
4.0 


The  soil  from  the  old  beds  was  in  very  bad  condition  and  had  been 
very  carelessly  handled,  apparently. 

A  count  of  mosaicked  seedlings  left  in  these  old-bed  soils  six  weeks  after 
the  transplants  was  taken,  showing,  respectively,  an  infection  of  A,  43 
per  cent.;  21,  32  per  cent.;  la,  17  per  cent.;  B,  6  per  cent.;  and  C,  7+ 
per  cent. 

It  is  evident  that  some  of  the  seedlings  were  infected  during  trans- 
planting, probably  by  handling  diseased  seedUngs  and  then  healthy  ones, 
thus  transmitting  the  disease.  This  method  of  transmission  at  the  time 
of  transplanting  is  very  common,  as  has  been  pointed  out  repeatedly. 

It  has  been  shown  that  much  of  our  infection  may  originally  come  from 
the  seed  bed  as  a  result  of  the  soil  becoming  infected  for  any  reason.  The 
use  of  tobacco  stems  and  tobacco  water  has  also  been  found  by  many 
investigators  to  cause  infection.  The  amount  of  infection  resulting  from 
watering  beds  with  water  extract  of  diseased  stems  is,  however,  prob- 
lematical, and  it  is  not  believed  by  the  writer  that  this  is  an  important 
factor  in  mosaic  transmission,  especially  if  the  stems  are  steeped  in  hot 
water.  The  broken,  decaying  roots  of  diseased  plants  left  in  the  beds  also 
carry  the  causal  agent  of  the  disease  as  do  the  stems  of  diseased  plants, 
and  freezing  has  apparently  little  or  no  effect  on  it,  so  the  use  of  stems  on 
the  seed  bed  should  be  carefully  attended  to  in  order  not  to  apply  any 
from  diseased  plants.    Where  stems  and  tobacco  water  are  applied  year 


MOSAIC   DISEASE    OF   TOBACCO.  115 

after  j^ear  without  attention  to  this  point  the  bed  usually  becomes  more 
seriously  infected. 

One  of  the  cheapest  methods  for  the  control  of  this  disease  in  the  seed 
bed,  where  it  can  be  advantageously  carried  out,  is  to  change  the  location 
of  the  beds  to  soil  on  which  no  tobacco  has  been  grown,  and  to  avoid  the 
use  of  stems  and  tobacco  water.  Occasionally,  however,  some  sUght  in- 
fection will  occur  even  here,  but  as  a  rule  not  to  any  great  extent.  If 
proper  attention  is  paid  to  watering,  ventilation,  etc.,  little  trouble  of 
this  character  is  to  be  expected  in  new  seed  beds. 

It  has  been  shown  in  Connecticut  and  elsewhere  that  a  thorough  ster- 
ihzation  of  the  seed  bed  by  steam  at  a  boiler  pressure  of  from  70  to  90 
pounds  is  also  a  satisfactory  method  for  the  control  not  only  of  fungous 
diseases  but  weeds  also,  and  the  same  holds  true  for  the  mosaic  disease. 
The  writer  has  seen  this  tried  a  number  of  times  with  excellent  results 
where  the  above-mentioned  pressures  have  been  used.  Some  growers, 
however,  seem  to  be  of  the  opinion  that  the  prime  value  of  steaming  is  to 
kill  weed  seeds,  and  so  use  low  pressures.  While  low  pressures  will  kill 
weed  seeds,  it  is  questionable  if  they  will  sterilize  the  soil  sufficiently  to 
kill  the  spores  of  fungi  or  render  inactive  the  causal  agent  of  the  mosaic, 
although  under  laboratory  conditions  it  is  rendered  inactive  at  tempera- 
tures of  about  80°C,  equivalent  to  176°F.  In  some  of  our  experiments 
conducted  some  years  ago  it  was  strongly  indicated  that  improper  partial 
sterihzation  would  not  entirely  rid  the  soU  of  the  causal  agent  of  mosaic. 

It  might  be  stated  here  that,  in  many  cases  where  the  growers  have 
reported  failure  in  the  control  of  diseases  after  steam  sterihzation,  inquiry 
has  usually  brought  out  the  fact  that  too  low  pressure  was  used,  and  as 
a  result  thorough  sterihzation  was  not  obtained.  Another  source  of  fail- 
ure of  beds  after  sterihzation  with  steam,  under  high  pressure,  has  been 
that  the  grower  has  not  paid  sufficient  attention  to  watering.  This  mat- 
ter should  be  closely  attended  to,  as  a  sterilized  bed,  particularly  on  light 
soils,  dries  out  very  quickly,  and  needs  much  more  attention  than  is  usually 
given  a  bed  under  ordinary  conditions.  If  the  watering  is  neglected  there 
is  very  often  a  severe  checking  of  the  germination  of  the  seed,  and  in  some 
cases  a  partial  loss  of  the  bed. 

Formalin  sterihzation  may  also  be  used,  and  is  quite  as  satisfactory, 
especially  when  used  on  light  soils.  On  heavy  soils  it  is  not  quite  so  con- 
venient to  apply,  however.  Where  formaUn  is  used  the  beds  cannot  be 
sown  until  all  the  formalin  is  out  of  the  soil,  which  usually  takes  from  ten 
days  to  two  weeks.  This  very  often  is  too  long  a  delay,  particularly  where 
spring  sterilization  is  practiced. 

It  has  been  pointed  out  that  the  workmen  may  be  a  rather  important 
factor  in  transmitting  the  disease  (page  88),  and  in  cases  where  at  trans- 
planting time  diseased  seedlings  are  handled  it  has  been  recommended 
by  Clinton^  that  the  hands  be  thoroughly  washed  in  soap  and^water 

«  G.  P.  Clinton:  Chlorosis  of  Plants  with  special  reference  to  Calico  of  Tobacco.  Conn.  Agr. 
Exp.  Sta.  Rept.,  1914,  p.  417. 


116       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    175. 

before  again  handling  healthy  seedUngs.  If  these  precautions  are  taken, 
according  to  Clinton,  a  considerable  amount  of  mosaic  infection  will  be 
avoided  at  the  time  of  planting. 

It  has  been  repeatedly  shown  that  care  should  be  exercised  during 
early  cultivation  not  to  cut  the  roots  or  touch  broken  or  abraded  leaves 
of  plants  and  then  subsequently  touch  other  plants,  for  the  disease  is 
very  easily  transmitted  in  this  way,  as  the  fine  hairs  or  epidermis  may  be 
broken  and  infection  occur.  The  amount  of  infection  due  to  cultivation 
is,  however,  in  the  wi-iter's  opinion,  shght,  but  as  much  care  as  is  com- 
mensurate with  efficiency  should  be  exercised  by  the  workmen  during 
cultivation. 

The  advisability  of  the  removal  of  diseased  plants  is  open  to  question, 
and  on  the  whole  it  cannot  be  economically  recommended  unless  the 
plants  can  be  replaced  early  in  the  season.  As  has  been  previously  pointed 
out,  the  disease  may  be  carried  from  plant  to  plant  when  topping,  etc., 
and  the  subsequent  sucker  growth  will  become  mosaic.  At  tlus  time,  how- 
ever, the  commercial  leaves  are  of  such  size  that  their  value  will  not  be 
materially  impaired,  but  if  possible,  to  prevent  a  certain  amount  of  infec- 
tion, only  healthy  or  diseased  plants  should  be  topped  at  any  one  time. 
Of  course,  aU  suckers  developing  later,  diseased  or  otherwise,  should  sub- 
sequently be  removed  from  all  plants,  not  only  for  the  sake  of  the  com- 
mercial leaves,  but  to  prevent  a  ragged  looking  field,  giving  the  appear- 
ance of  a  large  amount  of  mosaic. 

It  has  been  very  difficult  to  associate  any  particular  type  of  soil  with 
general  occurrence  of  mosaic  disease,  but  on  the  whole,  from  data  gathered 
at  different  times,  the  heavier  types  of  soil  in  the  valley  appear  to  be  more 
generally  favorable  for  the  production  of  mosaic-diseased  plants.  This 
cannot  be  definitely  stated,  however,  as  the  data  are  complicated  by  the 
fact  that  in  some  cases,  on  both  heavy  and  light  soils,  the  condition  of 
the  SOU  as  regards  organic  matter  present  enters  into  the  question.  The 
writer  has  observed  that  on  many  heavy  soils  where  comparatively''  large 
amounts  of  organic  matter  are  present  during  certain  seasons,  in  com- 
parison with  similar  soils  deficient  in  organic  matter,  the  mosaic  is  much 
less.  To  a  certain  extent  this  holds  true  also  for  the  lighter  soils.  The 
exact  relation  existing  between  the  mosaic  disease  and  these  factors  is 
at  present  not  enough  studied  to  warrant  definite  conclusions,  but  Sturgis 
(loc.  cit.)  was  of  the  opinion  that  clayey  soils  were  favorable  to  its  pro- 
duction. It  is  a  significant  fact  that  many  of  our  tobacco  soils  are  some- 
what deficient  in  organic  matter,  however.  Well-cultivated  and  conse- 
quently well-aerated  soils  do  not  apparently  produce  as  many  mosaicked 
plants  as  those  which  are  not  well  cultivated. 

Another  factor  which  should  be  carefully  attended  to  is  that  of  the 
moisture  conditions  in  the  bed  at  the  time  the  plants  are  pulled.  It  should 
not  be  too  moist  nor  too  dry,  as  in  either  case  the  roots  are  apt  to  be 
broken  and  infection  from  handling  result  more  certainly  than  when  the 
plants  are  removed  with  a  minimum  of  root  injury. 


MOSAIC   DISEASE    OF   TOBACCO.  117 


Summary. 

1.  The  mosaic  disease  is  not  caused  by  fungi  or  bacteria.  It  has  never 
been  possible  to  demonstrate  the  presence  of  these  organisms  in  the  tis- 
sue of  any  part  of  the  plant. 

2.  The  disease  is  highly  infectious,  particularly  when  inoculated  into 
young  plants,  all  subsequent  growth  exhibiting  marked  symptoms. 

3.  The  disease  is  not  contagious. 

4.  Until  more  is  known  about  the  action  of  the  so-called  "ultramicro- 
scopic"  organisms,  the  disease  cannot  be  ascribed  to  an  organism  of  that 
class,  as  the  character  and  reactions  of  the  causal  agent  do  not  in  many 
respects  coincide  with  reactions  of  that  class  of  organisms. 

5.  Many  of  the  reactions  of  the  causal  agent  are  of  such  a  nature  as  to 
indicate  that  it  is  either  an  enzyme,  an  aggregate  of  enzymes,  or  the  prod- 
uct of  enzyme  activities. 

6.  The  enzyme  activities  of  diseased  plants  are  greatly  altered,  far  more 
than  is  usually  the  case  in  plants  which  are  attacked  by  pathogenic  fungi 
or  bacteria. 

7.  As  a  result  of  the  writer's  experiments,  it  is  believed  that  the  disease 
is  primarily  induced  by  a  disturbance  in  the  enzjone  activities  and  their 
relation  to  each  other,  due  to  abnormal  metabolism,  and  not  by  any 
parasite. 

8.  The  pathogenicity  of  a  disease  is  not  necessarily  a  proof  that  it  is  of 
parasitic  origin,  as  it  is  conceivable  that  similar  conditions  may  exist 
relative  to  enzjnue  activities,  although  the  extent  of  such  action  is  not 
known  at  present. 

9.  On  fields  where  the  mosaic  disease  is  prevalent,  the  primary  infec- 
tion can  usually  be  traced  to  the  seed  bed,  and  many  healthy  seedlings 
are  infected  by  the  workmen  when  setting  the  plants.  It  is  estimated 
that  about  80  per  cent,  of  the  infection  occurs  in  this  manner. 

10.  Owing  to  the  nature  of  the  disease  the  matter  of  absolute  preven- 
tion and  control  is  difficult,  but  with  careful  attention  to  details  of  ster- 
ilization of  the  seed  bed,  and  handling  of  the  plants  at  time  of  trans- 
planting, a  large  percentage  of  infection  may  be  avoided. 


BULLETIN  No.    176. 


DEPARTMENT   OF    CHEMISTRY. 


THE  CAUSE   OF  THE  INJURIOUS  EFFECT  OF 

SULFATE  OF  AMMONIA  WHEN  USED 

AS  A  FERTILIZER.^ 


BY  R.  W.  RUPRECHT  AND  F.  W.  MORSE. 


Part  I.  —  Chemical  Investigations. 

In  a  previous  report  ^  there  has  been  described  how  the  continued  use 
of  sulfate  of  ammonia  on  the  experiment  plots  called  "Field  A"  caused 
the  removal  of  lime  in  the  drainage  waters  in  the  form  of  calcium  sulfate, 
and  when  lime  was  not  present  in  sufficient  quantity  there  were  formed 
noticeable  amounts  of  aluminium  sulfate  and  iron  sulfate,  but  that  no 
accumulation  of  free  acid  could  be  found. 

Since  comparatively  little  material  had  been  published  on  the  forma- 
tion of  salts  of  aluminium  ard  iron  in  soils,  it  was  considered  advisable 
to  continue  the  investigations,  and  as  the  work  progressed  it  was  found 
that  soluble  manganese  salts  were  also  present  in  some  of  the  soils  to 
which  sulfate  of  ammonia  had  been  applied. 

The  present  bulletin  is  a  report  of  our  investigations  into  the  relations 
between  sulfate  of  ammonia  and  salts  of  aluminium,  iron  and  manganese, 
and  the  quantities  of  these  salts  which  will  injure  clover  seedUngs. 

Soils  from  plots  1,  6,  7  and  8  of  Field  A  were  used  to  determine  how 
freely  ammonium  sulfate  solutions  would  extract  manganese  from  them. 
The  soils  have  been  fully  described  in  Bulletin  No.  185,  but  for  con- 
venience the  fertilizers  used  on  these  four  plots  mil  be  described  here. 

Each  plot  received  dissolved  boneblack  at  the  rate  of  500  pounds  per 
acre,  and  muriate  of  potash  250  pounds  per  acre.  Plot  1  received  300 
pounds  of  nitrate  of  soda  per  acre;  plots  6  and  8  received  225  pounds  of 

1  The  work  reported  in  this  bulletin,  together  with  the  material  published  in  Buls.  Nos.  161 
and  165,  was  submitted  by  Mr.  Ruprecht  to  the  faculty  of  the  graduate  school  of  the  Massa- 
chusetts Agricultural  College  in  part  fulfillment  of  the  requirements  for  the  degree  of  doctor  of 
philosophy. 

2  Bui.  No.  165,  "The  Effect  of  Sulfate  of  Ammonia  on  Soil." 


120       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    176. 

sulfate  of  ammonia  per  acre;  and  plot  7  received  no  nitrogenous  fertilizer. 
In  1909,  and  again  in  1913,  hydrated  lime  was  applied  to  one-half  of  Field 
A,  crosswise  of  the  plots.  The  total  amount  in  the  two  dressings  was 
9,000  pounds  per  acre. 

The  ammonium  sulfate  solutions  were  used  in  the  manner  described  in 
Bulletin  No.  165,  viz.:  150  grams  of  air-dry  soil  were  placed  in  a  large 
flask  with  750  cubic  centimeters  solution  and  shaken  frequently  for  two 
hours.  The  solution  was  then  filtered  through  paper,  which  gave  a  clear 
filtrate  with  a  yellowish  tint. 

Manganese  was  determined  by  the  colorimetric  method  described  by 
Schreiner  and  Failyer,!  in  which  the  manganese  salts  are  oxidized  to 
permanganate  by  nitric  acid  and  lead  peroxide. 

The  strengths  of  the  solutions  were  tenth-normal  (N/10)  and  normal 
(N).  The  results  obtained  by  the  extracts  from  unUmed  soils  are  tabu- 
lated in  Table  I.,  together  with  the  amounts  of  iron  obtained  from  the 
same  soils  in  our  previous  work,  and  reported  on  page  81  of  Bulletin 
No.  165. 

Table  I.  —  Milligrams  Manganese  Oxide  {Mn-JD^  and  Iron  Oxide 
(Fe.jOg)  obtained  from  100  Grams  Air-dry  Soil  by  Ammonium  Sulfate 
Solution. 


Plot. 

Manganese  Oxide. 

Ikon  Oxide. 

N/10  Solution. 

N  Solution. 

N/10  Solution. 

N  Solution. 

1, 

6 

7, 

8 

Trace. 

.88 
Trace. 

.63 

.58 
1.52 
1.18 
1.45 

.40 
.46 
.43 
.89 

.79 

.51 

.50 

1.21 

The  stronger  solution  removed  much  more  manganese  than  the  weaker, 
but  not  in  proportion  to  its  strength.  The  fertilization  of  plots  6  and  8 
with  ammonium  sulfate  evidently  produced  some  manganese  compounds 
that  were  readily  soluble  in  the  solutions,  since  there  was  more  manganese 
obtained  from  those  plots  than  from  the  other  two. 

From  the  limed  soils  of  these  four  plots  there  was  removed  no  man- 
ganese by  N/10  or  N  solutions,  but  when  stronger  solutions  of  am- 
moniiim  sulfate  were  used  (2^  N  and  5  N),  traces  of  manganese  were 
found  in  the  soil  extracts.  This  would  appear  to  be  due  to  the  presence 
of  enough  ammonium  sulfate  in  the  concentrated  solutions  to  overcome 
the  lime  and  act  upon  the  manganese  in  the  soil. 

Since  iron  had  been  found  by  color  tests  to  be  generally  present  in  water 
extracts  from  the  unlimed  soils  of  Field  A,  while  aluminium  could  rarely 

»  Bui.  No.  31,  Bureau  of  Soils,  U.  S.  Dept.  Agr.,  1906. 


INJUEIOUS  EFFECT  OF  SULFATE   OF  AMMONIA. 


121 


be  detected  by  the  precipitation  test  with  ammonium  hydroxide,  it  was 
decided  to  try  larger  quantities  of  soil  and  larger  volumes  of  water,  which 
would  permit  subsequent  concentration  and  perhaps  yield  measurable 
quantities  of  these  elements  by  the  usual  analytical  methods. 

Eight  kilograms  of  air-dry  soil  were  put  in  a  percolation  jar,  the 
tubulure  of  wliich  was  covered  with  a  piece  of  linen  and  plugged  loosely 
with  glass  wool.  Enough  water  was  added  to  saturate  the  soil,  which 
was  then  left  in  the  wet  condition  for  two  days.  Water  was  then  added 
in  portions  of  1  liter  at  a  time,  each  of  which  ceased  dropping  from  the 
bottom  of  the  jar  before  another  was  added.  Eight  liters  were  thus  used, 
and  the  percolated  water  was  evaporated  in  a  porcelain  dish  on  the  water 
bath  until  the  volume  was  reduced  to  1  liter,  which  was  next  filtered 
tlii'ough  paper  and  finally  through  a  porcelain  filter  under  pressure,  as 
there  was  a  turbidity  which  paper  would  not  remove. 

The  clear  soil  extract  was  next  heated  and  made  slightly  alkahne  with 
ammonium  hydroxide.  A  copious  flocculent  precipitate  formed,  which 
was  collected  on  a  filter,  washed  and  then  analyzed.  When  the  filtrate 
was  further  heated  and  a  few  drops  of  ammonia  added,  a  second  precipi- 
tate, similar  to  the  first,  formed  and  was  also  analyzed.  The  two  pre- 
cipitates differed  but  little  in  composition,  and  the  results  obtained  were 
combined  in  .Table  II. 

Table  II.  —  Constituents  of  Precipitate  obtained  in  Concentrated  Soil  Ex- 
tract, expressed  as  Milligrams  in  100  Grams  of  Soil. 


Plot  1. 

Plot  6. 

Plot  8. 

Aluminium  oxide  (AhOs), 

Silica  (Si  O2), 

Manganese  oxide  (Mn304), 

Calcium  oxide  (Ca  0), 

.074 
.381 

None. 

1.955 

.152- 

.538 

1.596 

None. 

.105 
.835 
.362 
.225 

The  precipitate  was  found,  to  contain  but  a  trace  of  iron,  which  is  not 
tabulated  as  such,  but  is  really  included  in  the  aluminium  oxide.  The 
calcium  which  separated  in  the  ammonium  hydroxide  precipitate  was 
apparently  in  the  form  of  carbonate,  as  the  precipitate  from  the  extract 
of  plot  1  effervesced  vigorously  when  dissolved  in  hydrochloric  acid,  as 
the  first  step  in  analysis. 

There  is  a  striking  difference  between  the  precipitate  obtained  in  the 
soil  extract  from  plot  1  and  those  from  plots  6  and  8.  The  protective 
effect  of  nitrate  of  soda  on  the  calcium  in  the  soil  is  shown  in  contrast  to 
the  depleting  influence  of  ammonium  sulfate,  with  the  consequent  forma- 
tion of  salts  of  manganese  and  aluminium.  No  effort  was  made  to  esti- 
mate possible  calcium  or  manganese  not  precipitated  by  the  successive 
additions  of  ammonium  hydroxide. 


122       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    176. 

A  second  series  of  percolation  experiments  was  tried  in  which  but  1 
kilogram  of  soU  was  used,  and  proportionately  smaller  amounts  of  water 
were  percolated  through  it,  until  the  total  percolate  amounted  to  1  liter. 
The  percolate  was  filtered  through  porcelain  and  subsequently^  yielded  no 
precipitate  with  ammonium  hydroxide. 

Iron  and  manganese  were  both  found  and  determined  by  the  colori- 
metric  methods.  Both  limed  and  unlimed  soils  from  plots  1,  6,  7  and  8 
were  used  in  this  series.  All  the  extracts  yielded  colorimetric  tests  for 
iron,  but  only  those  from  the  unlimed  soils  showed  any  manganese.  The 
results  on  the  unlimed  soils  are  given  in  Table  III. 


Table   III.  —  Milligrams  Manganese  Oxide   (Mn-Oi)   and  Iron  Oxide 
{Fe^Ozj  removed  in  Water  from  100  Grams  of  Unlimed  Soil. 


Plot  1. 

Plot  6. 

Plot  7. 

Plot  8. 

Manganese  oxide,         .... 
Iron  oxide 

Trace. 
.04 

1.49 
.07 

.49 
.09 

.47 
.06 

The  amounts  of  manganese  from  the  soils  of  plots  1,  6  and  8  are  closely 
like  those  obtained  in  the  previous  series  with  8  kilograms  of  soil. 

The  iron  obtained  is  about  one-half  the  amount  of  aluminium  oxide 
tabulated  in  the  previous  series. 

There  were  in  the  laboratory  samples  of  soil  from  plots  5  and  6  which 
were  collected  four  years  before,  in  1912.  Plot  5  had  received  the  same 
amount  of  sulfate  of  ammonia  that  had  been  applied  to  plot  6.  Both 
samples  were  from  the  unlimed  halves  of  the  plots.  One  kilogram  of  each 
was  treated  as  in  the  previous  experiment.  The  exi-racts  showed  the 
presence  of  aluminium  and  iron,  but  were  most  striking  in  the  tests  for 
manganese.  Plot  5  yielded  2.36  mg.  Mn304,  and  plot  6  yielded  3.18 
mg.  Mn304,  from  100  grams  of  soil.  This  shows  that  the  formation 
of  salts  of  aluminium,  iron  and  manganese  by  ammonium  sulfate  was  as 
marked  four  years  ago  as  in  1916. 

All  these  experiments  showed  that  ammonium  suKate  persistently 
formed  soluble  salts  of  aluminium,  iron  and  manganese  in  the  soil  of 
Field  A. 

It  was  next  decided  to  secure  samples  of  soils  from  other  fields  that  had 
received  ammonium  sulfate  as  a  fertilizer  over  a  considerable  period  of 
time.  The  desired  soils  were  obtained  from  the  agricultural  experiment 
stations  of  Ohio  and  Rhode  Island  by  the  kindly  co-operation  of  Director 
Thorne  and  Director  Hartwell. 

The  soil  of  the  Ohio  experiment  field  is  a  rather  heavy  clay  loam.  The 
samples  were  taken  from  Section  C  of  the  continuous  five-year  rotation 
experiment  described  in  Circular  No.  144  of  the  Ohio  Agricultural  Experi- 
ment Station.    The  plots  selected  for  our  purpose  were  Nos.  8  and  24. 


INJURIOUS  EFFECT  OF  SULFATE   OF  AMMONIA.        123 

Since  1893  each  plot  had  received  acid  phosphate  and  muriate  of  potash, 
but  plot  S  had  not  received  any  nitrogenous  fertilizer,  while  plot  24  had 
been  dressed  with  sulfate  of  ammonia  at  the  rate  of  220  pounds  per  acre 
during  each  five-year  period.  One-half  of  each  plot  had  received  ground 
limestone  annually  at  the  rate  of  2  tons  per  acre  since  1908,  while  the  other 
half  had  received  none  during  that  period. 

The  plots  were  seeded  with  clover  at  the  time  the  soil  samples  were 
taken  in  the  fall  of  1915. 

In  a  letter  regarding  the  samples,  Director  Thome  said:  — 

For  several  years  there  has  been  practically  no  clover  on  the  unlimed  ammonium 
sulfate  plots  in  our  work.  There  are  occasionally  a  few  scattering  plants,  but 
probably  not  20  plants  on  the  twentieth-acre  plot.  .  .  .  When  ammonium  sulfate 
is  neutralized  ^vith  Hme  we  get  a  luxuriant  growth.  .  .  .  There  are  usually  at  the 
beginning  of  the  season  as  many  clover  plants  on  the  unlimed  as  on  the  limed 
land,  but  they  do  not  get  much  beyond  the  nutriment  furnished  by  the  seed,  and 
by  harvest  have  disappeared. 

The  soil  of  the  Rhode  Island  experiment  field  is  a  sandy  loam.  The 
samples  for  our  use  were  taken  from  the  permanent  plots  numbered  23, 
25  and  29,  which  have  been  repeatedly  described  in  the  annual  reports  of 
the  Rhode  Island  Agricultural  Experiment  Station. 

All  three  plots  have  received  acid  phosphate  and  muriate  of  potash 
smce  1893.  Plots  23  and  25  have  been  supplied  with  nitrogen  in  sulfate 
of  ammonia,  while  plot  29  has  had  nitrate  of  soda.  Plots  25  and  29  have 
at  irregular  intervals  received  apphcations  of  lime,  and  in  1915  all  three 
plots  received  a  dressing  of  it,  but  in  different  amounts.  Plot  23  received 
the  equivalent  of  500  pounds  calcium  oxide  per  acre,  plot  25  received  1,500 
pounds,  and  plot  29  received  1,000  pounds.  This  appHcation  of  500 
pounds  per  acre  on  plot  23  was  the  first  in  its  history,  and  was  made,  as 
Director  Hartwell  stated,  ".  .  .  because  it  was  becoming  so  very  unsuit- 
able for  crop  growth." 

The  soils  were  prepared  for  investigation  by  drying  them  at  a  moderate 
temperature,  and  then  sifting  them  through  a  coarse  screen  with  seven 
meshes  to  the  linear  inch,  which  is  the  same  treatment  that  was  used  with 
the  soils  from  Field  A. 

The  samples  from  Rhode  Island  were  used  in  percolation  experiments 
with  quantities  of  1  kilogram  of  soil  and  1  liter  of  percolated  water. 

The  clay  of  the  Ohio  soils  rendered  this  method  impracticable  because 
the  water  percolated  very  slowly.  The  Ohio  samples  were  accordingly 
put  in  stoppered  bottles,  with  twice  as  much  water  as  there  was  soil  by 
weight,  and  shaken  continuously  for  two  hours  in  a  machine.  The  solu- 
tions were  first  filtered  through  paper  and  finally  through  porcelain  filters. 

Aluminium,  iron  and  manganese  were  tested  for,  and  when  present  in 
measurable  quantities  their  amounts  were  determined. 

Aluminium  could  not  be  obtained  in  appreciable  quantity  from  any 
but  the  soil  from  plot  23  of  the  Rhode  Island  field.     No  manganese  was 


124       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    176. 

found  in  the  extracts  from  any  Rhode  Island  sample,  but  was  obtamed 
from  all  the  Ohio  samples.  Iron  was  extracted  from  all  but  the  more 
heavily  limed  soils. 


Table  IV.  —  Milligrams  of  Aluminium  Oxide  (AWs),  Iron  Oxide  (FeoOz), 
and  Manganese  Oxide  {Mn-iO^  removed  in  Water  jrom  100  Grams  of 
Soil. 

[Soils  representing  Ohio  and  Rhode  Island  experiments  with  ammonium  sulfate.) 


Ohio  plot  8,  limed, 
Ohio  plot  8,  unlimed, 
Ohio  plot  24,  limed, 
Ohio  plot  24,  unlimed, 
Rhode  Island  plot  23, 
Rhode  Island  plot  25, 
Rhode  Island  plot  29, 


Aluminium 
Oxide. 


Iron  Oxide. 


None. 
None. 
None. 
None. 

3 
None. 
None. 


Trace. 

.05 
None. 

.03 

.27 
Trace. 
None. 


Manganese 
Oxide. 


Trace. 

.16 

.03 

.64 
None. 
None. 
None. 


The  Oliio  soil  which  had  received  sulfate  of  ammonia  (plot  24)  without 
lime  gave  a  striking  reaction  for  soluble  manganese  salts  similar  to  our 
own  soils;  but  in  the  soils  from  Rhode  Island  the  sulfate  of  ammonia 
seemed  to  exert  its  influence  on  aluminium  and  iron  compounds  (plot  23). 

At  a  later  period  samples  of  soil  were  received  from  Prof.  F.  D.  Gardner 
of  Pennsylvania  State  College,  which  were  taken  from  different  plots  on 
the  permanent  experknent  field  at  that  institution.  The  soil  of  the  field 
is  a  clay  loam.    The  samples  were  taken  from  plots  31,  32  and  36. 

Plots  31  and  32  had  received  equal  amounts  of  dissolved  boneblack  and 
muriate  of  potash.  Plot  31  had  sulfate  of  ammonia  applied  at  the  rate 
of  240  pounds  per  acre  every  two  years,  while  plot  32  received  360  pounds 
per  acre  in  the  same  period.  Plot  36  received  no  fertiUzer.  This  treat- 
ment had  been  in  vogue  since  1885. 

One  kilogram  of  air-dry  soil  was  treated  with  water  by  the  percolation 
method. 

Plot  32  with  the  heavier  apphcation  of  ammonium  sulfate  jdelded  strik- 
ingly more  iron  and  a  little  more  manganese  than  plot  31. 

The  unfertilized  soil,  plot  36,  yielded  the  most  iron,  but  a  negligible 
amount  of  manganese. 


INJURIOUS  EFFECT  OF  SULFATE   OF  AMMONIA.         125 


Table  V.  —  Milligrams  of  Iron  Oxide   (FeJOz)   and  Manganese  Oxide 
(MnJJi)  removed  in  Water  from  100  Grams  of  Soil. 

[Soils  representing  Pennsylvania  experiments  with  sulfate  of  ammonia.] 


The  results  of  the  chemical  investigation  of  the  effect  of  sulfate  of  am- 
monia as  a  fertilizer  in  constant  use  on  soils  of  four  different  experiment 
fields  show  the  accompaniment  of  soluble  salts  of  either  aluminium,  iron 
or  manganese,  or  all  three  together,  in  the  absence  of  a  base  hke  hme.  In 
the  presence  of  calcium  carbonate,  water  has  removed  no  observable 
amounts  of  aluminium  or  manganese  salts,  and  bare  traces  of  iron  salts, 
indicating  that  Ume  either  reacts  with  the  ammonium  salt  promptly,  or 
subsequently  breaks  up  the  salts  of  aluminium  and  manganese,  and  also- 
iron  salts,  almost  completely. 

Part  II.  —  Water  Cultures. 

Our  investigation  of  the  effects  of  sulfate  of  ammonia  on  the  soils  of 
Field  A  included  in  its  progress  several  series  of  water  cultures  in  wluch 
seedlings  of  rye,  barley  and  clover  were  used  to  study  the  possibilities  of 
poisonous  effects  from  the  presence  of  soluble  substances  in  the  soils.  In 
the  earliest  series  there  were  used  water  extracts  made  from  soils  of  plots  1, 
6,  7  and  8  for  the  purpose  of  learning  whether  the  injurious  effect  of  am- 
monium sulfate  applied  to  the  soil  would  appear  in  the  solution  obtained 
from  the  soil. 

The  soil  extracts  were  prepared  in  sufficient  quantity  by  mixing  soil 
and  water  in  the  proportion  of  1  part  by  weight  of  soil  to  2  parts  of  water, 
shaking  frequently  during  a  period  of  two  hours,  and  then  allowing  the 
hquid  to  clear  by  settling.  The  water  extract  was  then  carefuUy  decanted 
from  the  soil.  A  part  of  this  extract  was  filtered  through  porcelain,  under 
pressure,  to  see  whether  the  poisonous  substances,  if  present  in  the  extract, 
were  colloidal  in  their  nature. 

Discs  of  paraffine,  reinforced  by  wire  gauze  and  punctured  with  numer- 
ous holes,  were  arranged  by  means  of  suitable  corks  to  float  on  a  basin  of 
water  flush  with  the  surface.  On  these  discs  the  seeds  were  moistened 
sufficiently  to  germinate,  and  their  radicles  then  penetrated  through  the 
holes  into  the  water  below.  The  plan  was  essentially  that  described  in 
Bulletin  No.  70,  Bureau  of  Soils. 

As  soon  as  the  seedlings  were  large  enough  for  the  purpose,  selected 
ones  were  transferred  to  wide-mouthed  bottles,  which  contained  the  soil 
extracts.    Each  bottle  contained  250  cubic  centimeters,  and  4  seedlings 


126       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    176. 

were  supported  in  each  one  tlxrough  notches  cut  in  the  cork  stopper.    The 
different  series  were  grouped  as  follows:  — 

Plot  1. 
Rye  Seedlings. 
Unlimed  soil,  unfiltered  extract. 
Unlimed  soil,  filtered  extract. 
Limed  soil,  unfiltered  extract. 
Limed  soil,  filtered  extract. 

Clover  Seedlings. 
Unlimed  soil,  unfiltered  extract. 
Unlimed  soil,  filtered  extract. 
Limed  soil,  unfiltered  extract. 
Limed  soil,  filtered  extract. 

The  same  arrangement  was  maintained  for  the  soils  of  plots  6,  7  and  8, 
and  each  extract  was  tested  in  three  different  bottles  with  a  total  of  12 
seedlings.  The  cultures  were  maintained  for  four  weeks,  at  the  end  of 
which  the  seedhngs  had  begun  to  wilt. 

Differences  in  the  seedUngs  were  noted  by  the  end  of  the  first  week. 
Those  growing  in  the  extracts  from  the  limed  soils  were  noticeably  better 
as  a  whole  than  those  in  extracts  from  unhmed  soils.  Rye  seedlings  in 
the  unhmed  extracts  had  reddish  stems  and  grew  less  rapidly.  Roots  of 
the  clover  seedUngs  in  unlimed  extracts  began  to  appear  stunted;  es- 
pecially so  in  the  unlimed  extracts  from  plots  6  and  8.  When  the  experi- 
ment was  discontinued  the  best  seedlings  had  developed  in  the  extracts 
from  the  limed  soils  of  plots  6  and  8,  while  the  poorest  plants  were  in  the 
extracts  from  the  unhmed  soils  of  the  same  two  plots.  The  roots  of  the 
clover  in  these  two  extracts  were  short  and  thick  and  lacked  branches. 
Filtered  extracts  produced  the  same  results  as  unfiltered  ones. 

A  lot  of  barley  seedUngs  was  next  used  in  the  unfiltered  soil  extracts. 
At  the  end  of  the  first  week  the  roots  in  the  unlimed  extract  from  plot  6 
began  to  look  stunted.  By  the  end  of  two  weeks  the  seedlings  in  aU  the 
unlimed  extracts  showed  a  tendency  to  wilt  and  the  tips  of  the  leaves 
turned  white.  At  the  end  of  the  fourth  week,  when  the  experiment  was 
stopped,  the  seedUngs  in  the  extracts  from  the  limed  soils  were  uniformly 
superior  to  those  in  the  extracts  from  the  unlimed.  The  poorest  seedUngs 
were  in  the  extract  from  the  unUmed  soil  of  plot  6. 

The  strikingly  inferior  growth  of  the  different  kinds  of  seedlings  in  the 
extracts  from  the  unlimed  soils  of  plots  6  and  8,  which  had  been  dressed 
with  ammonium  sulfate,  suggested  that  the  poisonous  effect  might  be  due 
to  sulfates  of  aluminium,  iron  or  manganese,  wliich  were  known  to  occur 
in  extracts  from  those  soils. 

More  culture  experiments  were  accordingly  tried  from  time  to  time,  in 
which  standard  nutrient  solutions  were  used  instead  of  soU  extracts.    Vari- 


INJUEIOUS  EFFECT  OF  SULFATE   OF  AMMONIA.       127 

ous  proportions  of  ferrous  sulfate  were  added  in  one  series,  aluminium 
sulfate  was  used  in  a  second  series  and  manganous  sulfate  in  a  tliird. 

The  standard  nutrient  solution  was  prepared  in  two  parts:  (a)  20.5 
grams  manganesium  sulfate  in  350  cubic  centimeters  of  water;  and  (6)  40 
grams  calcium  nitrate,  10  grams  potassium  nitrate,  20.56  grams  disodium 
phosphate  in  350  cubic  centimeters  of  water.  From  each  of  the  solutions 
(a)  and  (6)  were  taken  100  cubic  centimeters  and  added  to  9,800  cubic 
centimeters  of  water,  together  with  a  few  drops  of  ferric  chloride  solution. 
This  diluted  nutrient  solution  was  used  in  the  culture  bottles. 

Seedlings  of  red  clover  were  used  in  all  these  experiments  with  nutrient 
solutions,  because  clover  had  shown  the  greatest  susceptibility  to  the  soil 
influences  on  Field  A. 

The  experiments  with  sulfates  of  aluminium  and  iron  have  been  fully 
described  in  Bulletin  No.  161  of  this  station,  and  only  a  summary  of  the 
results  is  given  here. 

Effects  of  the  aluminium  and  iron  salts  began  to  show  by  the  end  of  the 
first  week,  in  stunted,  tliickened  roots,  followed  in  a  few  days  by  a  smaller 
groTviih  of  leaves,  when  compared  with  seedlings  in  the  check  nutrient 
solutions.  Cultures  with  43  parts  of  aluminium  in  a  million,  or  with 
only  44  parts  of  iron,  produced  these  effects,  while  in  the  higher  concen- 
trations employed  the  roots  were  killed.^ 

Calcium  hydrate  and  calcium  carbonate  added  to  the  bottles  contain- 
ing aluminium  or  iron  neutralized  their  injurious  effects  in  the  lower  con- 
centrations, but  were  ineffective  with  high  concentrations.  Calcium  sul- 
fate was  entirelj^  ineffective  as  an  antidote. 

The  poisonous  effects  of  the  salts  appeared  to  be  exerted  upon  the  tips 
or  growing  parts  of  the  roots.  The  rootlets  died  leaving  a  thick,  stubby 
taproot.  Microscopic  examinations  of  the  roots  by  Dr.  G.  H.  Chapman 
showed  the  cells  in  the  growing  parts  to  be  either  killed  or  arrested  in 
their  development. 

Photographs  of  the  clover  seedlings  which  were  published  in  Bulletin 
No.  161  are  reproduced  here  to  show  the  characteristic  effects  of  the 
poisonous  sulfates  of  aluminium  and  iron. 

Culture  experiments  in  which  manganous  sulfate  was  added  to  the 
nutrient  solutions  in  graduated  quantities  were  begun  after  it  had  been 
demonstrated  that  ammonium  sulfate  fertiUzation  was  accompanied  by 
soluble  manganese  salts  in  the  soils  to  which  no  lime  had  been  added. 

A  solution  of  manganous  sulfate,  MnS04.4  HoO,  was  prepared  of  Vio 
molecular  concentration,  and  measured  amounts  were  made  up  to  250 
cubic  centimeters  with  the  nutrient  solution.  Certain  bottles  received 
fine  calcium  carbonate  and  others  calcium  sulfate,  so  that  the  solutions  in 
those  bottles  were  approximately  saturated  with  the  calcium  salt. 

The  scheme  of  the  series  is  outlined  below. 

1  In  preparing  this  bulletin  it  has  been  noted  that  in  Bui.  No.  161,  by  an  unfortunate  error  in 
the  decimal  point,  all  figures  relating  to  parts  per  million  of  iron  in  the  nutrient  solutions  are  only 
one-tenth  as  large  as  they  should  be.  This  error  caused  iron  to  appear  much  more  toxic  than 
aluminium,  as  compared  in  the  tables  of  that  bulletin. 


128       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    176. 


1. 


No. 
No. 
No. 
No. 
No. 
No. 
No. 
No.  8. 
No.  9. 
No.  10. 
No.  11. 
No.  12. 
No.  13. 
No.  14. 
No.  15. 


Standard  nutrient  solution. 
With  calcium  carbonate. 
With  calcium  sulfate. 

With  40  parts  manganese  per  million  of  solution. 
With  40  parts  manganese  and  calcium  carbonate. 
With  40  parts  manganese  and  calcium  sulfate. 
With  100  parts  manganese  per  million  of  solution. 
With  100  parts  manganese  and  calcium  carbonate. 
With  100  parts  manganese  and  calcium  sulfate. 
With  200  parts  manganese  per  million  of  solution. 
With  200  parts  manganese  and  calcium  carbonate. 
With  200  parts  manganese  and  calcium  sulfate. 
With  300  parts  manganese  per  million  of  solution. 
With  300  parts  manganese  and  calcium  carbonate. 
With  300  parts  manganese  and  calcium  sulfate. 


The  experiment  was  conducted  outdoors  in  the  pot  yard  instead  of  in 
the  greenhouse,  the  seedUngs  being  put  under  cover  at  night  and  during 
inclement  weather.    The  experiment  was  continued  four  weeks. 

The  effect  of  the  manganese  was  noticed  after  the  first  week.  The 
seedlings  with  manganese  did  not  grow  as  fast  as  the  checks,  and  also 
began  to  show  chlorosis  of  the  leaves.  The  roots  did  not  have  a  stunted 
appearance  as  was  noticed  wten  iron  and  aluminium  salts  were  used,  but 
seemed  to  be  simply  underdeveloped.  Neither  the  presence  of  calcium 
carbonate  nor  calcium  sulfate  had  any  beneficial  effect.  In  some  cases 
the  calcium  carbonate  seemed  to  aggravate  the  toxicity  rather  than  alle- 
viate it.  When  the  experiment  was  discontinued  the  tops  in  the  most 
concentrated  manganese  solutions  had  died  and  those  in  the  most  dilute 
had  apparently  lost  all  their  chlorophyl. 

The  tops  and  roots  of  the  plants  were  dried  and  manganese  determina- 
tions were  made  on  them.  The  table  shows  the  amounts  of  manganese 
found  in  1  gram  of  oven-dried  samples. 


Table  VI.  —  Milligrams  of  Manganese  Oxide  {Mn^O^  in  1  Gram  of  Clover 

Plants. 


Standard, 
40  ppm  Mn, 
100  ppm  Mn, 
200  ppm  Mn, 
300  ppm  Mn, 


Roots. 

None. 
17.94 
58.80 
S3. 90 
75.31 


The  results  show  that  manganese  is  taken  up  by  the  plants  in  consider- 
able amounts  and  is  carried  into  the  tops.  Concentrations  above  100 
parts  of  manganese  per  million  of  solution  have  little  effect  in  increasing 


INJURIOUS  EFFECT  OF  SULFATE   OF  AMMONIA.       129 

the  amount  taken  up  by  the  plant.  While  some  manganese  is  carried 
into  the  tops,  most  of  it  remains  in  the  roots. 

In  order  to  determine  whether  calcium  carbonate  or  sulfate  had  any- 
beneficial  action  in  more  dilute  solutions  of  manganese  a  second  experi- 
ment was  undertaken.  In  this  series  10  parts  and  20  parts  of  manganese 
in  a  million  parts  of  nutrient  solution  were,  respectively,  compared  with 
the  standard  and  with  equal  amounts  of  manganese  supplemented  by 
calcium  carbonate  and  by  calcium  sulfate. 

At  the  end  of  three  weeks  all  the  seedlings  except  those  in  the  standard 
solution  showed  chlorosis  by  the  light  green  or  yellowish  color  of  the 
leaves.  The  more  dilute  manganese  still  had  a  detrimental  effect  on  the 
clover  plants,  but  not  so  marked  as  in  the  previous  experiments  with 
higher  concentrations.  Neither  of  the  calcium  compounds  exerted  any 
beneficial  effects,  but  as  in  the  first  experiment  seemed,  if  anything,  to 
increase  the  injury. 

A  third  series  of  cultures  was  conducted  during  the  winter  in  the  green- 
house, and  concentrations  of  from  10  parts  to  40  parts  of  manganese  per 
million  of  nutrient  solution  were  again  tried  with  and  without  calcium 
carbonate  added  to  the  solution.  Much  cloudy  weather  caused  an  in- 
ferior growth  of  the  clover  plants,  but  the  experiment  was  continued  four 
weeks,  and  at  the  end  there  was  the  same  chlorosis  of  the  leaves  when 
manganese  was  present.  Again,  calcium  carbonate  failed  to  prevent  the 
chlorosis  in  the  presence  of  manganese,  and  instead  apparently  increased  it. 

Masoni,^  Pugliese-  and  Aso^  have  found  that  iron  salts  seem  to  counter- 
act the  toxicitj^  of  manganese.  In  order  to  confirm  their  conclusions  one 
series  of  experiments  was  undertaken  using  a  combination  of  these  two 
salts,  another  series  using  manganese  plus  aluminium  salt,  and  still  another 
series  using  iron  and  aluminium  together. 

To  the  standard  nutrient  solution  were  added  20  parts  of  manganese 
and  2  different  quantities  of  aluminium,  21.6  parts  and  43  parts,  respec- 
tively, per  million  of  solution,  with  and  without  calcium  carbonate.  A 
similar  series  was  prepared  containing  22  and  44  parts  of  ii'on  per  miUion, 
respectively. 

All  the  solutions  containing  iron  produced  seedlings  with  darker  color 
than  the  rest.  The  roots  in  the  solutions  containing  aluminium  or  iron 
became  stunted  in  appearance  whether  calcium  carbonate  was  present  or 
not.  Manganese  and  aluminium  or  iron  had  no  apparent  antagonistic 
effects  when  present  together  in  a  nutrient  solution. 

TMs  toxicity  with  calcium  carbonate  is  unlike  the  results  reported  by 
McCool,^  who  found  that  calcium  chloride  would  counteract  the  toxicity 
of  manganese  to  a  marked  extent.  Tliis  may  be  due  to  the  difference  in 
the  solutions  and  seedlings  used,  as  he  used  manganese  claloride,  calcium 
chloride  and  Canada  field  peas. 

1  Staz.  Sper.  Agr.  Ital.  44  (1911),  p.  85;  Abs.  E.  S.  R.  26. 

2  Atti  R  1st  Incoragg.    Napoli  6  ser.  65  (1913),  p.  289;  Abs.  Chem.  Abs.  9,  p.  641. 

3  Bui.  Agr.  College,  Tokyo,  V.  p.  177. 

*  Cornell  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  Memoir  No.  2  (1913). 


130       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION    BULLETIN    176. 

Having  found  that  manganese  is  carried  up  into  the  tops  of  the  plants 
the  following  experiments  were  tried  to  determine  if  there  was  an  increase 
in  the  amount  of  manganese  in  the  tops  of  clover  grown  on  plots  where 
the  poor  vegetation  was  thought  to  be  due  to  manganese. 

The  first  crop  of  clover  analyzed  was  the  same  as  that  reported  in 
Bulletin  No.  161.  The  tops  only  were  analyzed,  and  the  results  were 
based  on  dry  matter. 


Table    VH.  —  Milligram  of  Manganese  Oxide  (MW3O4)  in  1  Ch-am  of 

Clover. 


Plot. 

Fertilizer. 

Limed  Soil. 

Unlimed  Soil. 

1 

Nitrate  of  soda,     .... 

Trace. 

.076 

5 

Sulfate  of  ammonia, 

.054 

.193 

6 

Sulfate  of  ammonia, 

.054 

.193 

7, 

None 

.031 

.114 

8 

Sulfate  of  ammonia, 

Trace. 

.171 

The  clover  from  the  limed  portions  of  the  plots  shows  very  Uttle  differ- 
ence between  the  different  plots.  The  plants  from  the  unlimed  portions 
show  a  marked  increase  of  manganese  in  those  plots  receiving  sulfate  of 
ammonia. 

In  the  spring  of  1915  samples  of  clover,  grass,  clover  roots,  and  grass 
roots  were  taken  from  the  limed  and  unlimed  portions  of  plot  5.^  From 
the  unlimed  end  two  samples  were  taken,  one  of  normal  looking  plants 
and  another  of  poor  plants.  The  plants  were  brought  into  the  laboratory 
and  the  roots  carefully  washed  free  of  soil,  especial  care  being  taken  not  to 
break  many  of  the  finer  roots.  The  tops  were  then  cut  from  the  roots, 
and  the  clover  separated  from  the  grass,  the  same  being  done  with  the 
roots.  They  were  then  dried  at  75  degrees  and  ground.  The  tops  were 
then  analyzed  for  iron,  manganese  and  silica.  The  roots  were  only  an- 
alyzed for  manganese  as  it  is  almost  impossible  to  wash  them  entirely  free 
from  soil  which  would  invalidate  the  results  fo'r  iron  and  silica. 

1  Plot  5  is  fertilized  as  follows:    (NH4)2S04,  dissolved  boneblack,  low-grade  sulfate  of  potash. 


INJURIOUS  EFFECT  OF  SULFATE   OF  AMMONIA.       131 


Table  VIII.  —  Composition  of  Clover  and  Grass  Tops  and  Roots,  in  Milli- 
grams per  1  Grayn  of  Dry  Sample. 


Iron  Oxide 
re203. 

Manganese 
Oxide 
Mn304. 

Silica 

Si02. 

Plot  5,  limed  clover  tops, 

.63 

Faint  trace. 

1.72 

Plot  5,  limed  grass, 

- 

.053 

19.25 

Plot  5,  unlimed  good  clover. 

1.14 

Trace. 

4.82 

Plot  5,  unlimed  good  grass,  . 

1.91 

.158 

26.64 

Plot  5,  unlimed  poor  clover. 

1.34 

.096 

5.36 

Plot  5,  unlimed  poor  grass,  . 

2.97 

.272 

57.35 

Plot  5,  limed  clover  roots,     . 

- 

Trace. 

- 

Plot  5,  limed  grass  roots. 

- 

.138 

- 

Plot  5,  unlimed  good  clover  roots. 

- 

.091 

- 

Plot  5,  unlimed  good  grass  roots. 

- 

.218 

- 

Plot  5,  unlimed  poor  clover  and  grass  roots. 

- 

.245 

- 

A  study  of  the  table  shows  that  the  manganese  is  taken  up  to  a  greater 
extent  by  the  poor  plants,  both  clover  and  grass,  than  by  the  good  plants. 
The  grass  seems  to  be  more  tolerant  than  the  clover,  much  more  being 
taken  up  than  by  the  clover.  The  results  would  also  seem  to  indicate 
that  the  manganese  was  not  evenly  distiibuted  throughout  the  plot,  but 
was  more  concentrated  in  spots.  As  it  was  rather  difficult  to  find  normal 
clover  on  the  plot  it  might  be  said  that  the  spots  of  better  plants  were 
the  places  of  smaller  amounts  of  manganese.  A  somewhat  similar  condi- 
tion has  been  found  by  Guthrie  and  Cohen  ^  on  a  golf  green. 

The  variations  in  the  iron  content  of  the  good  and  poor  plants  are  so 
small  as  to  come  within  the  limit  of  experimental  error.  The  increased 
amount  of  silica  in  the  poor  plants  is  probably  due  to  their  more  mature 
state. 

As  the  foregoing  experiments  with  manganese  salts  in  nutrient  solutions 
had  shown  that  calcium  carbonate  did  not  counteract  the  toxicity  of  the 
manganese,  while  in  the  field  an  application  of  lime  to  soil  supposedly 
infertile  because  of  the  presence  of  manganese  salts  corrected  the  toxicity, 
pot  cultures  were  started  to  determine  whether  calcium  carbonate  in 
the  soil  could  counteract  the  toxicity  of  manganese. 

The  soil  used  was  from  the  unlimed  end  of  plot  7  and  the  unlimed  end 
of  plot  6.  As  the  soil  from  the  unUmed  end  of  plot  6  already  contained  a 
large  amount  of  soluble  manganese  it  was  first  extracted  by  shaking  it 
for  two  hours  on  a  mechanical  shaker  with  a  volume  of  water  twice  that 
of  the  soU.  The  soil  was  then  air-dried  and  passed  through  the  large 
sieve  (7  holes  to  the  linear  inch). 


1  Agr.  Gaz.  New  South  Wales,  21  (1910). 


132       MASS.   EXPERIMENT    STATION    BULLETIN    176. 

Earthenware  pots  6  inches  in  diameter  and  5  inches  deep  were  used. 
Each  pot  was  filled  with  2  kilos  of  the  air-dried  soil.  The  lime  was  applied 
to  the  surface  and  thoroughly  worked  in.  The  manganese  sulfate  was 
applied  in  solution.  The  soil  was  kept  at  a  25  per  cent,  moisture  content. 
The  clover  seed  was  first  soaked  for  eight  hours  in  a  solution  of  calcium 
h\T)ocliloride,  and  then  seeded  on  the  surface  of  the  soil  and  pressed  into 
contact  with  it.  The  soil  was  then  covered  with  a  half-inch  layer  of 
washed  quartz  and  sand  to  act  as  a  mulch.  The  treatment  employed  is 
shown  in  the  table,  there  being  two  pots  in  each  treatment. 


The  Series  of  Pot  Cultures. 


Pot. 

Plots. 

Soil  Treatment. 

1 

2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 

Plot  6, 
Plot  6, 
Plot  6, 
Plot  6, 
Plot  6, 
Plot  6, 
Plot  7, 
Plot  7, 
Plot  7, 
Plot  7, 
Plot  7, 
Plot  7, 
Plot  7, 
Plot  7, 

None. 

2  tons  calcium  carbonate  per  acre. 

Extracted  with  water. 

Extracted,  and  2  tons  calcium  carbonate  per  acre. 

Extracted,  and  80  pounds  manganese  sulfate  per  acre. 

Extracted,  and  2  tons  calcium  carbonate  and  80  pounds  manganese 

sulfate  per  acre. 
None. 

2  tons  calcium  carbonate  per  acre. 

80  pounds  manganese  sulfate  per  acre. 

2  tons  calcium  carbonate  and  80  pounds  manganese  sulfate  per 

acre. 
100  pounds  manganese  sulfate  per  acre. 

2  tons  calcium  carbonate  and  100  pounds  manganese  sulfate  per 

acre. 
150  pounds  manganese  sulfate  per  acre. 

2  tons  calcium  carbonate  and  150  pounds  manganese  sulfate  per 
acre. 

The  seeds  were  planted  on  March  7  and  8,  and  began  to  show  above 
the  sand  on  the  9th,  and  most  of  them  had  sprouted  by  the  15th,  when 
all  the  pots  were  watered  for  the  first  time.  The  plants  came  up  rather 
unevenly,  and  some  replanting  was  necessary.  The  replanting  was  done 
with  seedhngs  sprouted  on  paraffine  plates.  On  April  3  all  the  pots  were 
thinned  to  25  plants.  The  poorest  pots  at  this  time  were  Nos.  3  and  5, 
the  extracted  soil  with  and  without  the  addition  of  manganese.  All  of 
the  pots  treated  with  manganese  sulfate  without  lime  were  poorer  than 
those  receiving  lime.  On  April  24  the  above  differences  were  even  more 
striking.  The  plants  on  No.  5  had  practically  all  died,  while  on  No.  6, 
where  calcium  carbonate  had  been  added,  they  made  a  small  growth.  AJl 
of  the  plants  on  the  extracted  soil  were  poorer  than  those  on  the  other 
pots.  The  extraction  had  probably  removed  most  of  the  soluble  nutri- 
ents. 

The  clover  was  weighed  in  both  the  green  and  dry  states,  with  the 


INJURIOUS  EFFECT  OF  SULFATE  OF  AMMONIA. 


133 


results  given  in  Table  IX.  The  crops  were  subsequently  analyzed  for 
total  nitrogen,  iron  oxide,  silica  and  manganese,  the  results  of  which  are 
shown  in  Table  X. 


Table  IX.  —  Gravis  of  Clover  obtained  frovi  Pot  Cultures. 


Pot. 


Treatment. 


Green  Weight. 

Dry  Weight 

8.15 

1.20 

22.55 

3.55 

7.00 

1.05 

11.03 

1.60 

5.88 

.70 

17.03 

2.50 

30.00 

4.10 

32.98 

4.65 

25.78 

3.30 

35.23 

4.60 

25.58 

3.00 

34.78 

4.80 

19.80 

2.40 

34.00 

4.95 

None, 

Calcium  carbonate,         .... 

Extracted  with  water 

Extracted,  and  calcium  carbonate, 
Extracted,  and  manganese  sulfate, 
Extracted,  and  calcium  and  manganese. 

None, 

Calcium  carbonate,         .... 
Manganese  sulfate  (80  pounds). 
Calcium  carbonate  and  manganese  sulfate, 
Manganese  sulfate  (100  pounds),    . 
Calcium  carbonate  and  manganese  sulfate. 
Manganese  sulfate  (150  pounds),    . 
Calcium  carbonate  and  manganese  sulfate. 


The  soil  from  plot  6  was  noticeably  inferior  in  productivity  to  that 
from  plot  7,  when  used  in  the  pots  as  well  as  in  the  field.  This  is  shown 
by  comparing  pot  1  with  pot  7  and  pot  2  with  pot  8. 

Extracting  the  soil  with  water  diminished  the  crop,  as  shown  in  pots  3 
and  4,  indicating  that  soluble  plant  food  was  removed  by  the  water, 
whether  toxins  were  removed  or  not. 

The  addition  of  manganese  sulfate  to  the  soil  produced  a  marked  de- 
pression in  yield  on  both  soils  when  unaccompanied  by  calcium  carbonate, 
while  the  employment  of  the  calcium  with  the  manganese  resulted  in 
each  instance  in  an  increase  of  crop  beyond  that  produced  by  the  calcium 
carbonate  alone.  These  results  are  in  accord  with  field  experiments  lately 
reported  by  Skinner  and  Reid.^ 

Chemical  analysis  of  the  clover  was  confined  to  the  crops  from  the  soil 
of  plot  7.  Manganese  was  found  to  increase  in  the  clover  tops  nearly  in 
proportion  to  the  quantities  added  to  the  soil.  The  presence  of  calcium 
carbonate  in  the  soil  did  not  prevent  the  absorption  of  the  manganese  to 
a  marked  extent;  therefore  it  would  seem  to  have  been  an  antidote  for 
the  poisonous  effect  of  the  manganese  within  the  plant. 

The  consistent  increase  of  the  percentage  of  nitrogen  in  the  crops 


I  "Action  of  Manganese  under  Acid  and  Neutral  Soil  Conditions,"  Bui.  No.  441,  U.  S.  Dept. 
Agr.,  1916. 


134       MASS.   EXPERIMENT    STATION   BULLETIN    176. 

treated  with  carbonate  of  lime  is  striking,  and  has  been  noted  before  in 
our  field  work,  and  reported  in  Bulletin  No.  161. 

There  is  a  singular  discordance  between  the  ill  results  obtained  -uith 
manganese  sulfate  and  calcium  carbonate  used  together  in  w^ater  cultures 
and  the  good  effects  produced  by  their  joint  action  in  experiments  with 
soil  cultures.  It  is  possible  that  in  solutions  the  greater  solubility  of 
manganese  sulfate  permitted  its  rapid  absorption  by  the  roots  in  compari- 
son with  the  intake  of  the  less  soluble  calcium  carbonate,  and  injurious 
results  were  produced  in  advance  of  any  possible  antidotal  effect  of  the 
calcium. 


Table  X.  —  Percentage  Composition  of  Dry  Clover  from  Pot  Cultures. 


Pot. 

Treatment. 

Nitrogen. 

Silica. 

Iron 
Oxide. 

Manganese, 
Parts  in 
1,000,000. 

7 
8 
9 

10 
11 
12 
13 
14 

None, 

Calcium  carbonate,      .... 
Manganese  sulfate  (80  pounds). 
Calcium  and  manganese,     . 
Manganese  sulfate  (100  pounds). 
Calcium  and  manganese,     . 
Manganese  sulfate  (150  pounds). 
Calcium  and  manganese,    . 

3.04 
3.25 
2.88 
3.73 
3.28 
3.71 
3.15 
3.54 

1.03 
1.24 

.71 
1.74 
1.00 
2.39 

.88 
2.38 

.14 
.16 
.17 
.24 
.20 
.29 
.19 
.26 

Trace. 

Trace. 

.345 

.345 
.640 
.599 
1.157 
.893 

The  roots  were  carefully  washed  free  of  soD,  dried  and  analyzed,  but 
the  quantities  were  very  small  and  determinations  could  not  be  made  in 
duplicate  in  most  instances;  therefore  the  figures  have  not  been  included 
here. 

Conclusions. 

The  positive  presence  of  soluble  salts  of  iron,  aluminium  and  manganese 
in  soils  which  have  been  repeatedly  dressed  with  ammonium  sulfate  with- 
out adding  lime;  the  formation  of  one  or  more  of  these  salts  in  soils  that 
were  extracted  with  solutions  of  ammonium  sulfate;  and  the  positively 
injurious  action  of  manganese  sulfate,  iron  sulfate  and  aluminium  sulfate 
on  seedUng  plants  in  water  cultures  and  pot  cultures  when  taken  together 
form  a  chain  of  facts  w^hich  clearly  indicates  that  the  injurious  effects  of 
sulfate  of  ammonia  when  used  freely  without  the  accompaniment  of  lime 
are  due  to  the  formation  of  these  soluble  salts  in  the  soils  of  the  fields  so 
dressed. 


BULLETIN   No.    177. 


DEPARTMENT   OF   ENTOMOLOGY. 


POTATO  PLANT  LICE  AND  THEIR  CONTROL. 


BY  W.  S.  EEGAN. 


Economic  Importance  op  the  Pest. 

Potato  plants  among  other  crops  have  suffered  severely  from  the- 
attacks  of  plant  lice  during  the  present  summer.  The  extent  of  injury- 
has  varied  considerably  according  to  the  infestation.  Some  potato 
patches  with  a  mild  infestation  have  shown  little  injury,  and  the  loss  in 
yield  from  this  source  will  be  negligible.  In  other  fields,  judging  from  the 
extent  to  which  the  tops  have  been  killed,  the  crop  will  suffer  a  loss  of 
from  10  to  50  per  cent.,  and  in  some  instances  the  destruction  has  been 
so  complete  that  it  will  hardly  pay  to  harvest  the  crop. 

The  potato  plant  louse  (Macrosiphum  solanifolii  Ashm.)  is  not  a  new 
insect  to  this  section,  but  conditions  appear  to  have  been  ideal  during  the 
spring  and  early  summer  for  its  multiplication  to  such  numbers  as  to 
cause  devastation  in  many  places  where  no  measures  were  taken  to  check 
it.  Nor  has  injury  by  this  pest  been  exceptional  in  Massachusetts  this 
season.  Reports  from  Connecticut,  New  York,  New  Jersey,  Maryland, 
Virginia  and  Ohio  indicate  that  the  potato  crop  of  these  States  has  suf- 
fered equally  as  much;  and  in  some  of  these  States,  in  addition  to  killing 
the  potato  plants  in  many  localities,  these  lice  were  becoming  dangerously 
abundant  on  tomatoes.  The  potato  crop  of  Maine  and  Canada  has  also 
been  severely  curtailed  during  some  years  in  the  past  due  to  these  pests. 

In  Massachusetts  injury  to  potato  plants  by  plant  lice  became  evident 
during  the  second  week  of  July,  and  rapidly  increased  in  severity  until 
the  latter  part  of  the  month  and  early  August,  when  no  progressive 
injury  could  be  noticed,  and  an  examination  of  previously  badly  infested 
fields  showed  these  insects  present  only  in  very  small  numbers,  and  cer- 
tainly not  numerous  enough  to  cause  further  material  injury  this  season. 

This  indicates  a  period  of  about  three  to  four  weeks'  time  when  the 
plajit  lice  are  dangerously  prevalent  upon  potato  plants,  and  reports 
from  other  sections,  as  well  as  the  past  history  of  outbreaks  of  this  pest, 
indicate  that  this  is  about  the  length  of  time,  dating  from  their  first  ap- 


136       MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    177. 

pearance  in  injurious  numbers,  \\hen  damage  by  these  insects  need  be 
feared.  During  this  brief  period  potato  fields  showed  injury  varying 
from  h'ttle  to  the  complete  destruction  of  the  plants.  Some  patches  were 
completely  free  from  infestation,  wliile  others  near  by,  apparently  no 
more  attractive,  were  badly  injured  or  destroyed  before  insecticidal  treat- 
ment could  be  applied. 

The  gradual  disappearance  of  the  plant  lice  from  the  potato  plants, 
usually  about  a  month  after  infestation  becomes  e%'ident,  has,  in  many 
cases,  been  the  salvation  of  the  crop.  This  disappearance  is  due  mainly 
to  natural  controlling  factors,  such  as  parasitic  and  predatory  enemies, 
weather  conditions  and  disease,  all  of  which  contribute  to  the  destruction 
of  myriads  of  these  insects,  and  to  a  natural  migration  of  the  plant  lice 
from  potato  plants  to  other  host  plants  during  the  latter  part  of  July 
a,nd  August.    These  factors  will  be  discussed  at  greater  length  later. 

Description  of  Potato  Plant  Lice. 

Potato  lice  are  yellowish  or  greenish  in  color,  with  an  occasional  pink 
form.  Some  are  furnished  with  vnngs  and  can  fly  readily,  while  others 
are  wingless  and  have  to  depend  upon  crawling  for  getting  about.  When 
full  grown  these  insects  are  no  larger  than  a  pin  head,  and  because  of  their 
color  and  small  size,  and  the  fact  that  they  occur  for  the  most  part  upon 
the  underside  of  the  leaves,  plants  may  be  badly  infested  and  considerable 
injury  result  before  their  presence  is  noticed. 

Manner  of  Feeding  and  Nature  op  Injury. 

Plant  lice  are  sucking  insects  and  obtain  their  food  by  inserting  a 
bristle-like  beak  into  the  host  plant,  from  which  the  juices  are  extracted. 
Thus  all  feeding  is  done  beneath  the  surface  and  'tvithin  the  tissues  of  the 
plant.  On  plants  badly  attacked  the  leaves  begin  to  turn  yellow,  curl  up, 
gradually  turn  brown  and  die.  Under  conditions  favoring  their  growth, 
an  attack  by  plant  lice  of  a  week  or  two  will  suflfice  to  kill  a  large  portion 
of  the  top  of  a  potato  plant,  and  the  development  of  the  tubers  must 
necessarily  be  affected  on  plants  thus  injured.  When  a  leaf  or  stem 
becomes  too  dry  to  afford  suitable  feeding  ground  the  plant  lice  crawl  to 
a  fresh  leaf,  or  migrate  to  other  plants  and  continue  their  injury. 

Where  plant  lice  are  abundant  enough  to  cause  apprehension,  the 
underside  of  the  leaves,  stems  and  blossom  stalks  will  be  covered  with 
these  tiny  creatures,  and  the  plants  become  covered  with  honey  dew,  a 
sticky  substance  excreted  by  these  insects.  This  honey  dew  is  often 
attacked  by  a  black  fungus,  which,  together  with  the  molted  skins  ad- 
hering to  the  sticky  surface,  gives  the  plants  an  unhealthy  appearance 
and  undoubtedly  interferes  with  proper  functioning. 

In  spite  of  its  minuteness,  the  beak  of  the  plant  louse  makes  a  wound 
which  furnishes  a  suitable  entrance  for  disease,  and  even  if  the  infesta- 
tion with  plant  lice  is  insufficient  to  injure  the  plants,  the  infection  with 
disease  thus  caused  may  entirely  ruin  the  crop. 


POTATO  PLANT  LICE   AND  THEIR   CONTROL.         137 


Life  Cycle  of  the  Potato  Louse. 

Numerous  observations  have  been  made  on  the  life  cycle  and  habits 
of  the  potato  louse  (Bulletin  No.  147,  Maine  Agricultural  Experiment 
Station),  but  many  important  details  are  yet  to  be  learned.  Infestation 
of  potato  plants  during  the  late  spring  and  early  summer  is  accomplished 
by  a  migration  of  the  plant  lice,  either  by  flight  or  by  crawling  from  neigh- 
boring vegetation.  These  new  arrivals  are  all  females,  and  begin  at  once 
to  feed  upon  the  sap  of  the  plants.  These  females  lay  no  eggs,  but  in  a 
short  time  produce  living  offspring,  which  are  the  first  of  a  long  series  of 
females,  and  these  likewise  in  the  course  of  eight  to  ten  days  produce 
living  young.  Plant  lice  are  prolific  breeders,  a  single  female  often  pro- 
ducing as  many  as  20  young  per  day.  It  is,  therefore,  not  astonishing 
that  they  should  multiply  so  rapidly  and  cause  such  devastation  in  a 
comparatively  short  time.  No  males  or  egg-laying  females  ever  occur 
upon  potato  plants.  The  first  few  generations  may  be  wingless,  or  at 
any  time  winged  individuals  may  appear  and  fly  away  to  seek  fresh 
plants  for  their  own  feeding  and  for  their  progeny,  thus  causing  a  more  or 
less  even  infestation  of  potato  fields. 

After  spending  a  few  weeks  or  months  upon  potato  plants,  winged 
individuals  called  "fall  migrants"  appear  and  leave  the  potato  plants 
for  winter  hosts,  —  plants  of  the  same  kind  as  those  from  which  the 
spring  migration  took  place  to  the  potatoes.  As  previously  stated,  the 
migration  to  the  winter  hosts  here  in  Massachusetts  takes  place  probably 
to  some  extent  during  the  latter  part  of  July,  but  mainly  during  August, 
the  exact  time,  however,  varying  according  to  seasonal  fluctuations  of 
temperature  and  moisture,  and  the  condition  of  the  potato  plants.  The 
early  drying  out  or  dying  of  the  potato  tops  will,  no  doubt,  hasten  the 
appearance  of  "fall  migrants,"  regardless  of  whether  the  drying  out  is 
•due  to  injury  by  the  plant  lice  or  to  other  factors. 

Observations  by  Miss  Edith  Patch,  State  Entomologist  of  Maine,  seem 
to  indicate  that  buckwheat  and  shepherd's  purse  are  among  the  winter 
hosts  sought  by  these  insects.  The  migration  to  the  winter  host  plants 
is  followed  by  the  production  of  winged  males  and  wingless,  egg-laying 
females.  These  females  lay  glistening  brownish  black  eggs  upon  the 
leaves  and  stalks,  and  in  this  stage  the  winter  is  passed. 

Control  Measures. 

Practical  Considerations  and  Fundamentals  of  Control. 

Under  the  topic  "Manner  of  Feeding  and  Nature  of  Injury,"  discussed 
on  an  earlier  page,  it  was  pointed  out  that  plant  lice  obtain  their  food  by 
piercing  the  host  plant  and  sucking  the  juices  from  within,  no  feeding 
being  done  on  the  outer  surface.  Therefore  any  poison,  such  as  arsenate 
of  lead  or  Paris  green,  which  is  sprayed  over  the  foliage  and  must  be 
eaten  in  order  to  be  effective,  would  be  absolutely  useless  against  plant 


138       MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    177. 

lice,  since  these  insects  pierce  beneath  the  poison  before  feeding  is  begun. 
Accordingly,  a  contact  insecticide,  a  material  which  kiUs  by  contact  with 
the  body,  is  required  to  deal  effectively  with  these  sucking  insects,  and 
satisfactory  results  with  an  insecticide  of  this  nature  can  be  expected  only 
when  application  is  absolutely  thorough.  Each  insect  must  he  hit  hy  the 
spray  in  order  to  be  killed.  Careless  work  will  merely  lead  to  a  waste  of 
material,  time  and  energy  and  to  a  continuation  of  the  infestation.  Such 
carelessness,  frequently  due  to  ignorance  of  the  essentials  of  appUcation 
rather  than  intent,  is  often  the  source  of  complaint  that  material  recom- 
mended for  the  control  of  plant  hce  is  ineffective.  Almost  invariably 
unsatisfactory  results  with  standard  contact  insecticides  are  attributable 
to  improper  appUcation.  Since  potato  lice  confine  then-  feeding  almost 
wholly  to  the  underside  of  the  leaves,  care  must  be  taken  to  direct  the 
spray  upward  so  that  the  underside  of  each  leaf  will  be  well  covered. 

To  apply  such  a  spray  before  the  infestation  reaches  the  distinctly 
dangerous  stage,  while  it  might  kill  many  of  the  scattered  plant  lice, 
might,  on  the  other  hand,  be  merely  a  waste  of  energy,  for  the  amount  of 
injury  which  the  plant  Hce  are  going  to  inflict  is  purely  problematical,  so 
many  elements  of  uncertainty  enter  in.  For  instance,  weather  conditions 
play  an  important  part  in  the  welfare  of  the  plant  lice.  Heavy  rains 
wash  these  deUcate  insects  from  the  plants,  and  cold  weather  retards 
their  increase.  Warm,  damp  weather  is  favorable  to  a  parasitic  fungous 
disease  which  may  destroy  the  plant  lice  over  large  areas.  Parasitic  and 
predatory  enemies,  when  conditions  are  favorable,  often  destroy  such 
numbers  of  the  plant  Uce,  even  after  considerable  injury  to  the  plants  is 
evident,  that  control  measures  are  superfluous.  Then,  too,  the  natural 
migration  of  the  plant  lice  from  potato  plants  to  the  winter  hosts  is  an 
element  of  some  uncertainty.  The  greater  amount  of  injury  may  be  com- 
pleted and  the  plant  lice  soon  be  ready  to  leave  the  potato  plants  for  the 
winter  hosts  before  injury  to  the  vines  is  extensive  enough  to  become 
particularly  noticeable.  At  this  time,  if  the  fact  were  known,  it  would 
hardly  appeal  to  the  average  grower  as  an  economical  proposition  to  insti- 
tute control  measures. 

All  of  these  factors  combine  to  make  the  matter  of  the  desirability  or 
necessity  of  artificial  control  measures  for  potato  plant  lice  often  a  diSi- 
cult  one  to  determine.  Furthermore,  it  has  been  the  observation  of  the 
writer  that  in  many  cases  where  control  measures  have  been  carried  out, 
particularly  where  improper  application  made  several  sprayings  necessary, 
more  actual  injury  was  done  the  plants  by  the  handling  and  trampling 
incidental  to  such  work  with  a  contact  insecticide  than,  it  is  probable  in 
most  cases,  the  plant  lice  would  have  inflicted  had  the  infestation  been 
allowed  to  run  its  course. 

One  appUcation  with  the  proper  material,  properly  applied  to  the  under- 
side of  the  foliage,  when  the  infestation  is  severe  enough  to  cause  evident 
wilting  of  the  leaves,  can  in  most  cases  be  made  economically  and  to 
advantage,  especially  if  injury  is  noticeable  before  the  early  part  of 


POTATO  PLANT  LICE  AND  THEIR  CONTROL.    139 

August,  when  the  infestation  is  more  likely  to  be  progressive  than  other- 
wise. This  is  especially  the  case  with  the  average  garden  potato  patch. 
Over  larger  areas  the  practicabiUtj'  of  applying  treatment  must  be  deter- 
mined by  the  severity  of  the  infestation,  its  seasonal  importance,  —  that 
is,  whether  it  is  Uable  to  be  progressive  or  is  past  the  dangerous  stage,  — 
accessibility,  available  apparatus,  etc. 

Reference  has  already  been  made  to  the  fact  that  the  winter  is  passed 
in  the  egg  stage  of  the  plant  louse  upon  such  plants  as  buckwheat,  shep- 
herd's purse  and  possibly  various  other  weeds.  On  this  account  "clean 
culture;"  the  destruction  by  burning  of  potato  vines,  weeds  and  other 
refuse  about  gardens  and  potato  fields  after  harvest,  unless  such  material 
is  composted;  the  burning  over  of  grassy  and  weedy  fields  in  the  vicinity 
of  potato  patches  in  the  late  fall  or  early  spring;  and  late  fall  plowing 
of  gardens  are  worthy  of  more  general  practice. 

The  increased  danger  to  the  potato  crop  from  "blight"  after  infesta- 
tion with  potato  lice  has  already  been  pointed  out.  This  should  em- 
phasize the  need  of  frequent  spraying  with  Bordeaux  mixture  or  similar 
fungicide  for  the  remainder  of  the  growing  season. 

Efficiency  of  Various  Contact  Insecticides  for  the  Control  of  Potato  Lice. 

During  the  early  part  of  July,  when  injury  by  potato  lice  began  to 
cause  considerable  apprehension,  many  conflicting  reports  were  received 
concerning  the  efficiency  of  different  contact  insecticides  recommended  for 
the  control  of  these  insects.  On  this  account,  as  well  as  from  the  fact 
that  the  demand  at  this  time  for  nicotine  sprays  so  exceeded  the  supply 
in  manj'  localities  that  it  was  impossible  to  obtain  this  material,  it  was 
thought  desirable  to  have  at  hand  some  more  definite  knowledge  con- 
cerning the  effectiveness  of  the  various  common  contact  sprays,  in  order 
to  be  better  able  to  recommend  a  substitute  where  any  material  desired 
was  unobtainable. 

With  this  end  in  view  a  badly  infested  potato  field,  already  showing 
severe  injury  to  the  tops,  due  to  the  sucking  of  the  plant  lice,  was  selected 
to  carry  out  these  trials,  which  were  conducted  by  Mr.  A.  I.  Bourne  of 
the  Massachusetts  Agricultural  Experiment  Station  staff  and  the  writer. 
All  plants  treated  were  thorouglily  drenched,  the  under  and  upper  sides  of 
the  foliage  aUke,  and  carefully  tagged,  check  plants  being  left  for  com- 
parisons. It  must  be  kept  in  mind  that  a  satisfactory  contact  insecticide 
combines  safety  and  efficiency  with  reasonable  cost.  It  must  be  strong 
enough  to  kill  the  insects  and  yet  not  injure  the  foUage  of  the  plant  to 
which  it  is  applied,  and  the  cost  of  appUcation  must  not  be  excessive.  It 
will  be  seen  from  the  following  report  on  these  experiments  that  only  a 
comparatively  few  dilutions  of  the  materials  tried  met  this  test.  It  was 
impossible,  in  most  cases,  to  make  a  very  accurate  estimate  of  the  per- 
centage of  plant  Uce  killed,  so  that  where  a  percentage  estimate  is  given 
it  is  intended  to  show  the  comparative  efficiency  of  the  various  insecti- 
cides tried,  and  is  at  best  only  roughly  approximate.    It  is  hardly  to  be 


140       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    177. 

expected  that  the  spraying  operations  of  the  average  grower  will  result  as 
successfully  as  those  reported  here,  where  all  possible  care  was  taken  to 
thoroughly  drench  the  plants. 

It  should  be  kept  in  mind,  however,  that  it  is  only  necessary  to  reduce 
the  numbers  of  the  plant  lice  75  per  cent,  or  more,  when  they  can  no 
longer  continue  an  aggressive  attack  that  will  result  in  serious  injurj^  but 
must  take,  figuratively  speaking,  a  defensive  position  against  their  ene- 
mies. The  parasitic  and  predatory  enemies  of  the  plant  lice  are  much 
more  resistant  to  contact  sprays  than  the  plant  lice  themselves,  and  in 
no  case  with  the  insecticides  used  where  the  plants  were  not  injured  were 
these  beneficial  insects  destroyed,  although  they  were  present  in  numbers 
when  application  was  made.  The  few  plant  Uce  which  escape  an  efficient 
spray  application  fall  ready  prey  to  these  enemies.  A  report  of  the  results 
of  these  tests  follows :  — 


Material  and  Dilution. 


Plant  Lice  killed. 


Injury  to  Plants. 


"Black  Leaf  40"  (1-400)  with  soap, 

"Black  Leaf  40"  (1-800)  with  soap, 

"Black  Leaf  40"  (1-800)  with  Pyrox,  no 

soap. 
"Black  Leaf  40"  (1-1,000)  with  soap, 

"Black  Leaf  40"  (1-1,600)  with  soap, 

"Nico-Fiime"  liquid  (1-750)  with  soap 

Fish-oil  soap  (1-6), 

Fish-oil  soap  (1-6), 

Fish-oil  soap  (1-8), 

Kerosene  emulsion  (1-9), 

Miscible  or  soluble  oil  (1-25) 

Miscible  or  soluble  oil  (1-40) 

Miscible  or  soluble  oil  (1-50) 

Miscible  or  soluble  oil  (1-64) 

Lime-sulfur,  34°  Beaum6  (1-22), 

Lime-sulfur,  34°  Beaum6  (1-43), 


99-100  per  cent., 

98-99  per  cent., 

98  per  cent., 

Not  over  75  per  cent., 

Ineffective,  few  killed, 

98  per  cent., 

98-99  per  cent., 

98  per  cent., 

Not  over  50  per  cent., 

90  per  cent., 

Perfect  kill. 

Perfect  kill, 

98-99  per  cent., 

98  per  cent.. 

Ineffective,  not  over  20  per  cent. 

Ineffective,        .        .        .        . 


No  in, 
No  in, 
No  in, 
No  in. 
No  in. 
No  in. 
No  in, 
No  in. 
No  in, 
No  in. 


|ury. 

jury. 

jury. 

iury. 

iury. 

jury. 

iury? 

iury. 

jury. 

iury. 
Plants  killed. 
Considerable  injury. 
Some  injury. 
Some  injury. 
Some  injury. 
No  injury. 


Discussion  of  Results. 

1.  "Black  Leaf  40."  —  This  material  is  perhaps  the  insecticide  most 
commonly  used  for  the  control  of  plant  lice,  but  any  of  the  other  nicotine 
preparations  of  a  similar  nature  now  on  the  market  should  give  satisfac- 
tory results.  It  is  a  concentrated  solution  of  nicotine  sulfate,  containing 
40  per  cent,  of  nicotine  by  weight.  It  was  tried  with  four  dilutions  — 
1-400,  1-800,  1-1,000,  and  1-1,600  — in  each  case,  with  the  addition  of 
soap  at  the  rate  of  2  pounds  to  50  gallons  of  the  diluted  "Black  Leaf  40." 
Both  ordinary  hard  laundry  soap  and  liquid  soap  were  used  with  similar 


POTATO  PLANT  LICE  AND  THEIR  CONTROL.    141 

results,  the  hard  soap  being  cut  into  small  pieces  and  dissolved  in  boiling 
water  before  adding  to  the  solution.  If  liquid  soap  is  used,  1  quart  should 
be  added  to  every  50  gallons  of  the  diluted  "Black  Leaf  40."  In  addition 
to  increasing  the  effectiveness  of  this  nicotine  preparation  the  soap  aids 
materially  as  a  spreader,  thus  insuring  a  more  uniform  coating  of  the 
foliage  and  a  more  perfect  "hit"  of  the  plant  lice. 

All  of  the  four  dilutions  tried  showed  no  foliage  injury,  but  only  the 
1-800  strength  met  the  test  of  reasonable  economy  and  efficiency.  This 
strength  showed  nearly  a  perfect  kill. 

The  dilution  1-800  reduced  to  practical  terms  is  as  follows:  — 

"Black  Leaf  40,"     ......     5  pint. 

Hard  soap,  dissolved  in  boiling  water,         .  .     2  pounds  (liquid  soap,  1  quart). 

Water,  ........     50  gallons. 

Reduction  to  a  small  amount  would  be  as  follows:  — 

"Black  Leaf  40,"  ........     IJ  teaspoonfuls. 

Hard  soap,  dissolved  in  boiling  water,     .  .  .  .  .     f  ounce. 

Water, .  .  .  .1  gallon. 

The  cost  of  this  spray  material  will  depend  mainly  upon  the  quantity 
of  the  "Black  Leaf  40,"  or  similar  nicotine  preparation,  purchased.  In 
an  amount  of  10  pounds,  which  diluted  as  recommended  (1-800)  would 
give  1,000  gallons  of  spray  mixture,  the  cost  amounts  to  but  little  over  1 
cent  per  gallon.  If  purchased  in  an  amount  as  small  as  an  ounce  the  cost 
is  increased  to  something  over  4  cents  a  gallon. 

2.  "Black  Leaf  40"  and  Pyrox,  etc.  —  The  question  has  frequently  been 
asked  as  to  whether  or  not  "Black  Leaf  40"  can  be  safely  combined  with 
Pyrox,  Bordo-lead  and  other  materials,  such  as  arsenate  of  lead  and 
Bordeaux  mixture,  thus  reducing  the  labor  involved  in  making  separate 
applications.  Pyrox  and  Bordo-lead  are  a  combination  of  an  arsenical 
and  a  fungicide,  and  are  used  for  the  control  of  leaf -eating  insects,  such  as 
the  potato  beetle,  and  fungous  diseases.  "Black  Leaf  40"  and  Pyrox 
or  Bordo-lead  can  be  safely  combined  with  equally  as  good  results  as  when 
these  materials  are  used  separately.  However,  soap  should  not  be  used 
with  such  a  combination,  and  should  never  be  used  in  any  combination 
containing  Vycox,  Bordo-lead  or  Bordeaux  mixture,  as  an  "incompatible 
mixture"  results.  "Black  Leaf  40,"  or  any  similar  nicotine  preparation, 
may  also  be  safely  combined  with  arsenate  of  lead  or  Bordeaux  mixture 
—  but  without  the  addition  of  soap. 

3.  "Nico-Fume"  Liquid.  —  This  material  is  somewhat  similar  to 
"Black  Leaf  40,"  being  a  nicotine  preparation  containing  40  per  cent, 
free  nicotine.  There  appears  to  be  little  or  no  difference  in  the  effective- 
ness of  these  two  materials,  and  since  the  "Nico-Fume"  liquid  is  the  more 
expensive,  it  is  suggested  merely  as  a  possible  substitute  in  case  the 
"Black  Leaf  40"  is  not  obtainable.  It  was  used  at  approximately  the 
same  strength  as  the  "Black  Leaf  40,"  and  with  the  addition  of  a  like 


142       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    177. 

amount  of  soap.  Combinations  of  "Nico-Fume"  liquid  with  other  in- 
secticides and  fungicides  can  be  made  with  the  same  restrictions  as  for 
"Black  Leaf  40." 

4.  Fish-oil  or  Whale-oil  Soaps.  —  These  soaps  have  long  been  used  for 
the  control  of  plant  lice.  Three  dilutions  were  tried,  —  1  pound  to  5 
gallons  of  water,  1  pound  to  6  gallons  of  water,  and  1  pound  to  8  gallons, 
the  soap  being  cut  up  into  small  pieces,  dissolved  in  boiling  water,  and 
diluted  with  cold  water  to  the  required  strength.  The  1-5  and  1-6 
strengths  showed  high  efficiency.  The  1-8  strength  was  unsatisfactory, 
not  more  than  half  of  the  plant  lice  being  killed.  There  was  some  sus- 
picion of  foliage  injury  at  the  1-5  strength,  but  this  was  not  extensive, 
and,  since  some  of  the  tops  had  been  killed  by  the  plant  lice,  this  point 
could  not  be  definitely  determined.  The  1-6  strength  proved  efficient  and 
showed  no  injury.  Used  at  this  strength  the  cost  of  fish-oil  or  whale-oil 
soap  spray  is  approximately  that  of  the  "Black  Leaf  40"  solution,  1-800; 
that  is,  less  than  2  cents  per  gallon  where  a  quantity  of  the  soap  to  the 
amount  of  5  pounds  or  more  is  purchased.  Since  the  amount  of  soap  to 
be  dissolved  in  case  the  fish-oil  or  whale-oil  soap  is  used  is  greater  than 
the  quantity  used  with  the  "Black  Leaf  40"  solution,  the  latter  is  perhaps 
somewhat  preferable  because  of  the  smaller  outlay  of  time  and  bother 
thus  involved.  These  soaps,  however,  furnish  an  excellent  substitute  in 
case  of  difficulty  in  obtaining  the  nicotine  preparation.  Pyrox,  Bordo- 
lead,  Bordeaux  mixture  or  similar  materials  should  never  be  used  with 
soap  of  any  kind. 

5.  Kerosene  Emulsion.  —  This  material  was  made  according  to  the  usual 
stock  formula,  as  follows :  — 

Hard  soap,      .  .  .  .       -  .  .  .J    pound  (liquid  soap,  J  pint). 

Water,   ........      1  gallon. 

Kerosene,        .......     2  gallons. 

The  soap  is  cut  into  small  pieces  and  dissolved  in  the  water,  which 
should  be  boiling.  The  soap  solution  is  then  poured  into  the  kerosene 
while  hot,  and  churned  back  and  forth  with  a  spray  pump  until  a  creamy 
mass  is  formed  and  no  free  oil  is  present.  This  can  usually  be  done  satis- 
factorily in  from  ten  to  fifteen  minutes.  The  emulsion  formed  is  a  stock 
solution,  which  should  be  diluted  at  the  rate  of  1  part  to  9  parts  of  water 
for  plant  lice. 

It  was  supposed  that  kerosene  emulsion,  a  standard  remedy  for  plant 
lice  and  other  soft-bodied  insects,  would  prove  highly  effective  against 
potato  lice,  but  the  trials  with  this  material  proved  disappointing,  as  not 
more  than  90  per  cent,  of  the  insects  were  killed.  This  indicates  an  effi- 
ciency for  kerosene  emulsion  considerably  less  than  that  of  the  "Black 
Leaf  40,"  1-800,  and  the  fish-oil  soap,  1-6.  Furthermore,  the  trouble  and 
time  involved  in  making  the  emulsion,  as  well  as  the  danger  of  foliage 
injury  when  this  material  is  improperly  made,  militate  against  its  use 
where  the  other  materials  referred  to  above  arc  obtainable.    The  cost  of 


POTATO  PLANT  LICE  AND  THEIR  CONTROL.         143 

the  kerosene  emulsion  per  gallon  of  the  diluted  spray  is  something  over  1 
cent,  or  approximately  the  same  as  for  the  "Black  Leaf  40"  and  the  fish- 
oil  soap  solutions. 

6.  Miscible  or  Soluble  Oils.  —  One  of  the  standard  commercial  brands  of 
miscible  oils  was  used  in  these  tests,  this  being  tried  with  four  dilutions,  — 
1-25,  1-40,  1-50  and  1-64.  This  material  in  all  four  dilutions  showed  a 
very  high  killing  efficiency,  but  even  at  the  greatest  dilution,  1-64,  showed 
distinct  oil  injury  to  the  potato  foliage.  In  justice  to  this  material,  how- 
ever, it  must  be  said  that  the  sample  experimented  with  was  not  perfect, 
as  there  was  some  free  oil  evident,  an  ever-present  danger,  nevertheless, 
with  this  material.  Time  did  not  permit  obtaining  a  fresh  sample  of  mis- 
cible oil,  so  that  this  material  must  be  placed  in  the  questionably  danger- 
ous class  until  further  experiments  prove  to  the  contrary.  The  cost  of 
this  material  is  less  than  that  of  any  of  the  other  insecticides  referred  to, 
and  obtained  in  any  quantity  would  amount  to  less  than  1  cent  per  gallon 
of  diluted  spray  material, 

7.  Lime-sulfur.  —  A  standard  commercial  brand  of  this  material,  hav- 
ing a  density  of  34  Beaum^,  was  used  in  these  tests.  Two  dilutions  were 
tried,  — 1-22,  which  is  about  twice  the  normal  strength  for  application 
to  foliage,  and  1-43,  which  is  about  the  usual  dilution  for  foliage  spray- 
ing. Even  at  the  1-22  strength  this  material  killed  only  a  comparatively 
small  number  of  plant  lice,  and  could  in  no  way  be  considered  an  effective 
aphidicide.  Furthermore,  at  this  strength  there  was  evident  foliage  in- 
jury shortly  after  application,  which  took  the  form  of  a  wilting  or  droop- 
ing of  the  plants.  The  next  day,  however,  the  plants  thus  injured  seemed 
to  have  entirely  recovered. 

Spraying  Apparatus. 

Satisfactory  spraying  outfits  for  applying  insecticides  are  equally  as 
important  as  efficient  spray  materials.  Ordinary  hand  atomizers  are  use- 
less, since  it  would  be  necessary  to  turn  over  every  plant  so  that  the  under- 
side of  the  leaves  could  be  reached.  Such  handling  would  probably  result 
in  as  much  injury  to  the  plants  as  the  plant  lice  would  be  likely  to  inflict. 
For  small  garden  potato  patches,  perhaps  up  to  a  quarter  of  an  acre,  a 
knapsack  or  compressed-air  spray  pump  will  prove  satisfactory.  These 
pumps  bold  from  3  to  5  gallons  of  spray,  but  the  frequent  need  of  refilling 
makes  them  less  desirable  for  use  where  larger  areas  are  to  be  treated. 
In  spraying  operations  involving  fairly  large  potato  fields  a  barrel  pump, 
traction  outfit,  power  sprayer  or  similar  apparatus  will  be  found  the  only 
practicable  thing. 

Regardless  of  the  type  of  pump  used,  an  extension  rod  and  an  under- 
spray  nozzle  at  a  right  angle  to  the  rod  are  essential  in  order  that  the 
underside  of  the  leaves  may  be  easily  reached.  For  a  knapsack  or  com- 
pressed-air pump  a  3  or  4  foot  extension  rod  of  iron  or  brass  is  perhaps 
most  convenient.  A  4  or  5  foot  length  of  iron  pipe  is,  perhaps,  most  satis- 
factory when  directing  the  spray  by  hand  from  a  barrel  pump,  power 


144      MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    177. 

sprayer  or  similar  apparatus,  but  numerous  combinations  of  rods  and 
nozzles  may  be  made  to  increase  the  spraying  area  or  the  number  of  rows 
treated  at  one  time.  In  the  case  of  traction  sprayers  or  other  direct  row- 
spraying  apparatus  the  common  inverted  T  method  is  ordinarily  used 
with  two  nozzles  attached  to  throw  spray  in  opposite  directions,  so  that 
two  rows  may  be  treated  from  each  T.  By  attaching  several  T's  to  the 
main  cross  rod,  so  that  the  T's  come  between  the  rows,  a  number  of  rows 
may  be  sprayed  simultaneously.  It  is  essential  with  such  apparatus  that 
the  T's  be  made  sufficiently  long  and  the  nozzles  attached  at  the  proper 
angle  to  thoroughly  drench  the  underside  of  the  foliage.  Work  with  such 
apparatus  must  be  done  slowly  if  satisfactory  results  are  to  be  expected. 
Some  growers  have  adopted  an  arrangement  with  traction  sprayers 
whereby  a  cross  piece,  located  a  short  distance  in  front  of  the  nozzles, 
tips  over  the  plants.  The  nozzles  are  directed  forward  and  downward  so 
that,  theoretically,  while  the  plants  are  thus  tipped  over,  the  underside  of 
the  leaves  are  covered  with  the  spray.  Not  only  is  the  efficiency  of  this 
method  open  to  doubt,  but  the  effect  upon  the  plants  of  such  treatment  is 
worthy  of  consideration. 

A  nozzle  giving  a  fine  mist  spray  is  essential.  The  disk  and  Vermorel 
are  two  types  of  nozzles  well  adapted  for  the  work.  The  disk  nozzle 
must  be  of  the  angle  form,  which  gives  a  suitable  underspray  at  a  right 
angle  to  the  rod,  and  covers  a  fairly  large  area,  being  on  this  account  pref- 
erable to  the  Vermorel  nozzle.  The  Vermorel  nozzle  cannot  be  purchased 
in  the  angle  form,  but  a  45°  elbow  can  be  obtained  or  a  bend  made  in  the 
extension  rod  to  overcome  this  difficulty.  It  is  fairly  well  adapted  for 
use  with  a  knapsack  or  compressed-air  pump. 

Where  a  considerable  length  of  hose  is  needed  it  is  desirable  to  have  this 
as  light  as  possible  in  order  to  faciUtate  handUng  among  the  rows  with 
the  least  possible  injury  to  the  plants.  One-fourth  inch  Meruco  tubing 
has  been  found  highly  satisfactory  for  this  purpose,  especially  for  the 
leading  hose.  Attachments  for  this  tubing  to  rubber  or  cotton  hose  of 
larger  size  can  be  readily  obtained.  Long-tail  hose  couplings  will  also  be 
found  advantageous  in  preventing  a  "blow-out"  where  pressure  of  any 
amount  is  used. 

Summary  of  Control  Measures. 

1.  Potato  plant  lice  can  be  readily  controlled  by  the  use  of  a  contact 
insecticide  of  "Black  Leaf  40"  or  similar  nicotine  preparation  at  the  rate 
of  1  part  of  this  material  to  800  parts  water,  with  the  addition  of  com- 
mon laundry  soap,  dissolved  in  boiling  water,  at  the  rate  of  2  pounds 
(liquid  or  soft  soap,  1  quart)  to  50  gallons  of  the  diluted  "Black  Leaf  40" 
solution.    The  formula  in  practical  terms  is  given  on  an  earlier  page. 

Fish-oil  or  whale-oil  soap  at  the  rate  of  1  pound  to  6  gallons  of  water  is 
about  equally  as  effective,  but  is  less  desirable  on  account  of  the  extra 
time  and  bother  involved  in  dissolving  larger  quantities  of  soap. 

"Black  Leaf  40"  can  be  combined  safely  with  Pyrox,  Bordo-lead,  Bor- 


POTATO  PLANT  LICE  AND  THEIR  CONTROL.    145 

deaux  mixture  or  arsenate  of  lead,  but  soap  should  be  omitted  when  such 
combinations  are  made.  These  combinations  are  equally  as  effective  as 
when  the  materials  are  used  separately. 

Kerosene  emulsion  is  not  highly  effective  against  potato  plant  lice,  and 
the  labor  involved  in  preparing  this  material  is  also  against  its  use. 

Tests  with  miscible  or  soluble  oils  seem  to  indicate  that  these  materials 
are  dangerous  to  use  upon  potato  foliage. 

Lime-sulfur  is  ineffective  for  the  control  of  potato  plant  lice  even  at 
double  the  ordinary  strength  used  upon  foliage. 

2.  Satisfactory  results  with  an  efficient  contact  spray  can  be  expected 
only  when  thorough  work  is  done.  Each  insect  must  be  hit  with  the  spray. 
Since  plant  lice  confine  their  work  almost  wholly  to  the  underside  of  the 
leaves,  the  spray  must  be  directed  upward  from  underneath  the  plants. 
An  angle  disk  nozzle  or  similar  underspray  nozzle  is  necessary  for  such 
work.  One  thorough  application  with  an  efficient  spray  should  control 
potato  plant  lice  so  that  a  second  treatment  will  be  unnecessary.  Too 
much  handling  or  trampling  about  the  plants  will  often  result  in  more 
injury  than  the  plant  lice  are  likely  to  cause. 

3.  The  practicability  of  applying  treatment  for  the  control  of  potato 
lice,  especially  over  large  areas,  must  be  determined  by  the  severity  of 
infestation,  its  seasonal  importance,  —  that  is,  whether  it  is  likely  to  be 
progressive  or  is  diminishing  in  severity,  —  accessibility,  available  appa- 
ratus, etc.  If  injury  to  the  plants  has  not  been  severe  enough  to  kill  por- 
tions of  the  tops  of  the  plants  to  an  evident  extent  before  the  1st  of 
August,  it  is  probable  that  the  injury  likely  to  be  done  will  not  exceed  the 
cost  of  applying  treatment.  When  severe  injury  is  noticeable  before  the 
1st  of  August,  a  thorough  treatment  should  be  made  at  once.  Application 
before  the  insects  are  present  in  numbers  will  be  merely  a  waste  of  time 
and  energy. 

4.  The  destruction  by  burning  of  potato  vines  after  harvest,  together 
with  all  weeds  and  other  refuse  about  gardens  and  potato  fields,  unless 
such  material  is  composted;  the  burning  over  of  grassy  and  weedy  fields 
in  the  vicinity  of  potato  patches  in  the  late  fall  or  early  spring;  and  late 
fall  plowing  of  gardens  are  methods  of  clean  culture  which  may  materially 
reduce  future  infestation. 

5.  Injury  by  potato  lice  renders  the  plants  more  susceptible  to  "blight," 
and  should  emphasize  the  need  for  frequent  sprays  with  Bordeaux  mixture. 

Natural  Agents  in  the  Control  op  Potato  Plant  Lice. 

Many  factors  contribute  to  a  natural  control  of  potato  lice;  in  fact,  to 
such  an  extent  that  during  most  seasons  in  the  past  their  injury  has  been 
unimportant  in  Massachusetts. 

Weather  conditions  rank  very  high  among  controlling  influences.  Cool 
or  wet  weather  offers  quite  a  decided  check  to  aphid  development,  and 
heavy  or  continuous  rains  undoubtedly  destroy  many  of  these  delicate 
insects. 


146       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    177. 

Among  the  predatory  enemies  of  plant  lice,  lady  beetles  and  their 
young,  and  the  larvae  of  syrphus  flies,  are  most  important.  Both  as 
adults  and  during  the  immature  stages,  lady  beetles  are  voracious  feeders 
upon  plant  lice  as  well  as  upon  other  tiny  insects.  The  average  person 
readily  recognizes  a  lady  beetle  and  knows  its  beneficial  habits,  but  the 
lady  beetle  young,  being  of  an  entirely  different  appearance,  are  often 
mistaken  for  injurious  forms  and  unfortunately  are  destroyed.  These 
young  vary  in  length  all  the  way  up  to  about  a  half  inch,  are  bluish  or 
blackish  in  color,  often  with  orange  spots  on  the  back,  and  resemble  very 
much  a  miniature  alligator  in  general  appearance.  They  crawl  about 
freely,  destroying  large  numbers  of  the  plant  lice.  The  syrphus  fly  young 
are  maggot-like  forms,  being  pointed  at  the  head  end  and  somewhat 
broader  behind,  and  are  of  variable  length  but  average  about  one-fourth 
of  an  inch.  These  are  ordinarily  orange,  greenish  or  whitish  in  color,  are 
very  sluggish,  but  destroy,  nevertheless,  numbers  of  the  plant  lice. 

Tiny,  almost  microscopic,  wasp-like  insects  also  aid  in  the  destruction 
of  plant  lice,  their  young  living  parasitically  in  the  bodies  of  these  pests. 

During  certain  seasons,  especially  when  there  is  an  abundance  of  warmth 
and  moisture,  a  fungous  parasite  attacks  these  plant  lice  and  destroys 
large  numbers.  In  some  localities  this  disease  has  been  credited  with 
having  practically  exterminated  the  plant  lice  after  they  had  become 
numerous  enough  to  menace  seriously  the  potato  crop. 

Acknowledgments. 

The  foregoing  is  not  presented  as  a  "distinct  contribution  to  scientific 
knowledge,"  but  is  merely  an  attempt  to  present  in  available  form  facts 
already  determined  by  others,  together  with  results  of  personal  observa- 
tions and  experience. 

The  writer  wishes  to  acknowledge  credit  to  Bulletin  No.  147,  Maine 
Agricultural  Experiment  Station,  for  certain  facts  and  suggestions  made 
use  of  in  this  paper;  and  is  indebted  to  Mr.  A.  I.  Bourne  of  the  Massa- 
chusetts Agricultural  Experiment  Station  staff  for  assistance  in  carrying 
out  the  insecticide  tests. 

The  work  has  been  carried  out  under  the  direct  supervision  of  Dr.  H.  T. 
Fernald,  whose  kind  co-operation  has  been  of  much  help. 


BULLETi:^r   ^o.    178. 


DEPARTMENT   OF  ENTOMOLOGY. 


THE  EUROPEAN  CORN  BORER, 

Pyrausta  nuhilalis  Hiibner, 

A  RECENTLY  ESTABLISHED  'PEST  IN  MASSACHUSETTS. 


BY  S.   C.   VINAL. 


Nearly  every  year  we  find  a  new  insect  pest  of  foreign  origin  has  become 
established  in  some  section  of  the  United  States.  To  the  long  list  of  Euro- 
pean pests  now  found  in  Massachusetts  this  article  adds  one  more,  — 
the  European  com  borer  or  corn  pyralid,  Pyrausta  nuhilalis  Hiibner, 
recently  established  in  the  vicinity  of  Boston,  Mass.  This  species  has 
long  been  recorded  as  one  of  the  most  serious  enemies  to  maize  culture  in 
Europe,  and  if  not  checked  may  in  time  become  a  very  serious  pest  to 
America's  great  corn  crop. 

Discovery  and  Identification. 

During  the  past  summer  the  writer  found  many  corn  plants  in  the 
vicinity  of  Boston,  Mass.,  being  tunneled  by  light  colored  caterpillars,  the 
identity  of  which  was  unknown.  During  July  nearly  every  infested  plant 
could  be  readily  detected,  having  its  tassel  broken  over  and  hanging  pen- 
dent just  above  the  first  two  or  three  spikes.  This  was  due  to  the  larval 
tunnels  in  the  pith  of  the  main  tassel  stalk  so  weakening  it  that  the  wind 
readily  blew  it  over. 

Early  in  August  moths  emerged  from  pupae  collected  in  the  field,  and 
having  Dr.  C.  H.  Fernald's  collection  of  both  native  and  exotic  moths 
available,  a  successful  attempt  was  made  to  determine  the  species.  Speci- 
mens of  both  male  and  female  pyralid  moths  which  corresponded  identi- 
cally to  those  obtained  from  infested  corn  stalks  in  eastern  Massachusetts 
were  found  in  his  European  collection.  These  were  determined  by  M. 
Ragonet,  a  French  lepidopterist,  and  were  labeled  Pyrausta  (Botys) 
nuhilalis  Hiibner.  Further  proof  of  the  identity  of  this  moth  was  obtained 
by  submitting  specimens  to  Mr.  H.  G.  Dyar  of  the  United  States  National 
Museum,  Washington,  D.  C,  who  determined  them  to  be  Pyrausta 
nuhilalis  Hiibner,  a  native  of  Europe. 


148       MASS.    EXPERIMENT  STATION   BULLETIN    178. 


Description  of  the  Insect. 

When  full  grown  the  larva  is  1  inch  in  length;  the  body  is  flesh-colored, 
often  somewhat  smoky  or  reddish  above,  while  the  head  is  flat  and  dark 
brown  in  color.  On  close  observation  a  transverse  row  of  four  hght 
colored  spots,  with  two  smaller  ones  immediately  behind  them,  can  be 
seen  on  each  abdominal  segment.  From  each  of  these  light  colored  areas 
a  short,  stout  spine  arises,  and  this  character  distinguishes  the  European 
com  borer  from  the  mature  caterpillar  of  the  potato  and  corn  stalk  borer 
(Papaipema  nitella  Gn.). 

The  female  moth  has  a  robust  body,  is  pale  yellow  in  color  and  has  a 
wing  expanse  of  a  little  over  1  inch.  The  outer  third  of  the  fore  wing  is 
traversed  by  two  serrated  lines  darker  than  the  rest  of  the  wing,  while  the 
hind  wings  are  light  yellow  in  color. 

The  male  moth  has  a  long,  slender  body,  is  slightly  smaller  in  wing  ex- 
panse, and  in  color  is  reddish  brown,  being  much  darker  than  the  female. 
Between  the  two  serrated  lines  mentioned  above  is  a  pale  yellow  streak, 
and  near  the  middle  of  the  fore  wing  are  two  small  yellowish  spots.  The 
hind  wings  are  grayish  and  crossed  by  a  broad  band  of  pale  yellow. 

European  History. 

Pyrausta  nubilalis  is  widely  distributed  in  Europe  and  Asia,  having 
been  reported  in  literature  as  occurring  in  Central  and  Southern  Europe, 
West  Central  and  Northern  Asia  and  Japan.  Its  food  plants  in  these 
widely  separated  localities  consist  of  corn  (except  fodder  corn),  hemp, 
hops,  millet  and  several  wild  grasses.  Corn  and  hop  plants  are  severely 
damaged  by  this  pest,  50  per  cent,  of  these  crops  being  destroyed  in  some 
sections  of  Central  Europe. 

Foreign  literature  contains  a  large  number  of  references  to  the  serious 
damage  caused  by  the  larvse  of  P.  nubilalis,  but  there  is  a  decided  lack  of 
literature  dealing  with  its  biology  and  control. 

Status  of  the  Pest  in  Eastern  Massachusetts. 
Importation. 

The  questions  naturally  arise  as  to  how,  when  and  where  the  European 
com  borer  was  introduced.  At  the  present  time  these  cannot  be  definitely 
answered,  but  a  few  deductive  conjectures  may  be  given. 

The  important  European  food  plants  of  P.  nubilalis  consist  of  corn, 
hemp,  hops  and  millet.  Of  these  the  only  food  plant  offering  ideal  condi- 
tions for  its  importation  is  hemp.  This  crop  is  grown  to  some  extent  in 
Southern  Europe,  and  probably  some  plants  hifested  by  larvffi  of  P. 
nubilalis  were  cut  and  shipped  during  the  fall  and  winter  months  to  a 
cordage  company  in  the  vicinity  of  Boston,  Mass.  These  plants  were  not 
used  immediately,  and  the  larvse  transformed  to  pupse  in  early  spring, 
and  soon  emerged  as  moths.     On  finding  corn  plants  growing  in  the 


THE  EUROPEAN  CORN  BORER.  149 

vicinity,  oviposition  took  place  and  the  European  corn  borer  became 
established. 

Early  sweet  corn  gro\\'Ti  in  market  gardens  10  to  12  miles  inland  has 
been  seriously  attacked  by  this  pest  for  the  past  three  or  four  years,  and 
from  this  we  might  infer  that  it  was  imported  about  1910. 

A  survey  of  eastern  Massachusetts  showed  that  some  towns  located  at 
the  mouth  of  the  Mystic  River  were  more  generally  infested  than  others. 
At  the  mouth  of  this  river  is  located  the  Charlestown  Navy  Yard,  which 
probably  has  one  of  the  largest  "rope  walks"  in  Eastern  United  States. 
Whether  the  European  corn  borer  was  first  introduced  at  the  Navy  Yard, 
or  at  some  cordage  company  located  on  the  opposite  bank  of  the  river,  it 
has  been  impossible  to  ascertain,  but  enough  has  been  written  to  show 
that  it  probably  was  first  estabUshed  in  this  vicinity. 

Present  Distribvtion. 
The  area  infested  by  the  European  corn  borer  in  Massachusetts  is 
approximately  100  square  miles  in  extent,  and  is  located  immediately 
north  and  northwest  of  the  city  of  Boston.  The  places  most  severely 
infested  during  the  past  season  were  Somerville,  Medford,  Maiden,  Everett, 
Chelsea,  Revere,  Lynn,  Saugus,  Melrose,  Stoneham,  Winchester,  Arling- 
ton, Belmont,  Cambridge,  Brookline  and  the  following  parts  of  Boston: 
South  Boston,  Brighton,  Roxbury  and  Dorchester. 

Food  Plants. 

At  the  present  time  sweet  corn  is  the  only  valuable  commercial  crop 
seriously  attacked  by  this  pest,  for  the  other  food  plants  —  hops,  hemp 
and  millet  ■ —  are  not  grown  within  the  infested  region  of  Massachusetts. 
The  most  commonly  infested  weeds  and  grasses  are  barnyard  grass 
{Echinochha  crus-galli  Beauv.),  pigweed  {Amaranthus  retrojlexus  L.)  and 
foxtail  grass  {Setaria  glauca  Beauv.).  Dahlia  stems  are  also  injured  by  the 
European  corn  borer.  The  moths  apparently  prefer  to  oviposit  on  corn, 
and  will  not  infest  weeds  and  grasses  unless  corn  plants  are  not  available 
in  sufficient  numbers. 

Importajice. 

Sweet  corn  is  practically  the  only  corn  grown  within  the  infested  area, 
and  the  amount  of  damage  caused  by  the  European  corn  borer  depends 
upon  whether  it  is  an  early  or  late  variety.  The  early  crop  of  sweet  corn 
is  picked  during  late  July  and  early  August,  and  by  reference  to  the  life 
history  it  will  be  seen  that  these  plants  are  subjected  to  the  attack  of  the 
first  brood  of  larvae  only.  The  late  corn,  however,  suffers  from  the  attack 
of  both  the  first  and  second  broods  of  larva?.  While  the  early  crop  may 
be  damaged  to  the  extent  of  10  to  20  per  cent.,  the  loss  to  late  corn  plant- 
ings may  be  as  high  as  75  to  80  per  cent.  This  higher  percentage  of 
damage  to  late  corn  is  caused  by  the  habit  of  the  small  second  brood 
larvae  of  boring  through  the  husk  and  tunneling  in  the  developing  ear, 
making  it  worthless  for  market. 


150       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION    BULLETIN   178. 


Character  of  Injury. 

With  the  exception  of  the  leaf  blades  the  whole  corn  plant  above  ground 
is  subject  to  the  attacks  of  these  voracious  caterpillars. 

The  larvse  after  emerging  from  the  egg  either  commence  feeding  on  the 
unopened  staminate  flowers  borne  by  the  tassel,  or  immediately  pierce  the 
sheath  near  its  junction  with  a  node.  Those  which  feed  on  the  tassel  bore 
a  hole  in  the  side  of  the  buds  and  feed  on  the  internal  succulent  parts. 
Soon  these  small  caterpillars  leave  the  tassel  buds  and  enter  the  tassel 
stalks,  or  terminal  internode,  where  they  tunnel  through  the  pith  and 
finally  complete  their  larval  life  in  this  internode.  These  tunnels  so 
weaken  the  terminal  internode  that  it  soon  becomes  broken  over,  a  t3T)e 
of  injury  which  is  especially  noticeable  on  the  early  com  crop.  It  is  quite 
evident  that  this  injury  indirectly  affects  the  formation  of  corn  on  the 
cob  by  destroying  the  pollen  necessary  for  fertilizing  the  com  silk. 

Those  larvse  which  do  not  feed  on  the  tassel  immediately  pierce  the 
sheath  surrounding  an  internode,  usually  where  the  edges  overlap  at  its 
junction  with  a  node.  Here  they  feed  on  the  internal  surface  of  the 
sheath,  excavating  a  groove  halfway  around  the  stalk,  and  then  bore 
directly  into  the  pith  where  they  form  long  winding  tunnels.  Whenever 
the  larvse  during  their  tunneling  operations  reach  a  node,  a  rather  large 
cavity  is  usually  formed.  From  this  cavity  the  larvae  sometimes  bore 
through  the  node,  but  more  often  they  turn  and  tunnel  in  the  opposite 
direction  in  the  originally  infested  internode.  At  the  termination  of  the 
feeding  period  nearly  all  of  the  central  portion  of  the  stalk  has  been  eaten, 
and  this  so  weakens  the  plant  that  a  strong  wind  is  likely  to  break  over  the 
stalk,  thus  completing  the  destruction  commenced  by  the  caterpillars. 

A  number  of  these  stalk-boring  larvse  very  often  attack  the  small  stalk 
or  pedicel  bearing  the  ear,  and  in  some  cases  may  bore  directly  through 
this  into  the  developing  ear.  This  injury  to  the  pedicel  causes  the  ear 
to  wither  and  die. 

The  most  serious  damage  to  the  crop  is  caused  by  the  large  percentage 
of  the  second  brood  larvse  which  immediately  enter  the  ear  after  hatching. 
The  injury  by  this  brood  to  the  corn  ear  is  very  similar  to  that  caused  by 
the  well-known  corn  ear  worm  (Chloridea  obsoleta  Fab.).  Besides  feeding 
on  the  kernels  in  a  similar  manner  to  the  corn  ear  worm,  the  European 
corn  borer  exhibits  characteristic  tunneling  habits  and  bores  through  the 
cob. 

Life  History  and  Habits. 

As  the  life  history  has  not  been  thoroughly  worked  out,  it  is  onlj^  pos- 
sible to  give  a  brief  r6sum6  of  it  at  the  present  time. 

There  are  two  broods  a  year  of  the  European  corn  borer.  Hibernation 
takes  place  as  full  grown  or  nearly  full  grown  larvae,  within  their  tunnels 
in  the  corn  stalks,  and  in  some  cases  in  the  cob.  These  larvae  pupate  in 
the  spring  and  emerge  as  moths,  probably  the  latter  part  of  May.  Soon 
after  emergence  the  females  begin  laying  eggs  on  the  corn  stalks,  and  in  a 


THE  EUROPEAN  CORN  BORER.         151 

few  days  these  hatch.  The  young  larvae  begin  feeding  at  once,  and  quickly' 
eat  their  -way  through  the  sheath  before  they  tunnel  in  the  main  stalk. 
On  reaching  maturity,  which  occurs  the  latter  part  of  July,  the  larvse 
clear  out  a  portion  of  the  burrow,  prepare  an  opening  through  which  the 
adults  can  escape,  and  after  spinning  a  thin  silken  partition  across  the  top 
and  bottom  of  this  cleared  space,  transform  to  pupse.  The  moths  emerge 
for  the  second  brood  in  about  two  weeks.  This  brood  of  larvse  becomes 
full  grown  by  late  fall,  but  does  not  transform  to  pup®  at  once  as  in  the 
first  brood.  Instead,  the  winter  is  passed  as  larvae  within  the  stalks, 
pupation  taking  place  the  following  spring. 

Control. 

From  the  brief  sketch  of  the  life  history  it  is  apparent  that  there  is  no 
hope  of  destroying  this  pest  during  the  summer  by  the  use  of  insecticides, 
since  all  of  its  transformations  take  place  within  the  plant.  Our  main 
hope  lies  in  the  possibility  of  establishing  a  system  of  cultural  methods 
which  will  enable  us  to  prevent  injury.  The  fact  that  the  winter  stage  is 
passed  in  the  food  plant  suggests  control  measures  which  should  result  in 
killing  the  great  majority  of  the  hibernating  insects.  These  measures,  if 
carefully  followed,  should  reduce  the  injury  of  the  following  season  ma- 
terially. 

1 .  Burning  the  Stalks  during  the  Fall  or  Wi7iter.  —  While  this  is  un- 
doubtedly one  of  the  most  effective  measures  for  the  destruction  of  the 
hibernating  insects  which  can  be  adopted,  it  is  somewhat  wasteful,  for  the 
stalks  are  valuable  either  for  feed  or  as  a  source  of  humus  so  necessary  for 
maintenance  of  fertility  and  texture  in  the  garden  soil.  Burning,  there- 
fore, is  inadvisable  when  other  effective  methods  can  be  used. 

2.  Burying  the  Stalks.  —  In  home  gardens  the  stalks  may  be  put  in 
trenches  and  covered  by  at  least  1  foot  of  soil.  In  larger  market  gardens 
the  stalks  may  be  placed  in  the  center  of  manure  piles  until  decomposed. 
In  some  cases  plowing  under  might  be  resorted  to,  but  the  work  must 
be  thorough  or  it  will  be  ineffective.  Any  stalks  left  on  the  surface  are 
likely  to  harbor  a  crop  of  borers  for  the  next  season.  If  corn  stalks  are 
distributed  over  the  land  and  then  cut  up  by  running  a  disk  harrow  over 
the  field  in  both  directions  it  should  be  possible  to  turn  them  practically 
all  under. 

It  should  be  clearly  understood  that  half-hearted  work  is  of  little  value. 
Occasional  stalks  which  it  may  seem  hardly  worth  the  trouble  to  clean  up 
are  likely  to  harbor  enough  borers  to  severely  infest  the  spring  crop. 

3.  Feeding  the  Stalks.  —  From  the  economic  point  of  view  this  is  the 
best  possible  means  of  destroying  the  hibernating  insects,  since  the  value 
of  the  stalks  for  fodder  is  not  materially  affected  by  the  presence  of  the 
insects,  and  if  properly  carried  out  this  method  must  result  in  the  destruc- 
tion of  practically  all  of  them.  Feeding  the  stalks  whole  will  be  relatively 
ineffective,  since  parts  not  eaten  by  the  animals  are  likely  to  harbor  in- 
sects.   Shredding  the  stalks,  whether  to  be  fed  green  or  dry,  must  greatly 


152       MASS.    EXPERIMENT  STATION  BULLETIN   178. 

reduce  the  chances  that  any  of  the  msects  will  survive.  Ensilage  by- 
ordinary  methods  must  prove  a  highly  effective  method  of  destroying  the 
insects  present  in  the  stems  or  other  parts  of  the  affected  plants,  for  it 
would  seem  to  be  in  the  last  degree  improbable  that  they  could  survive 
under  the  conditions  existing  in  the  silo. 

Co-operation. 

It  has  been  pointed  out  that  the  caterpillars  w^hich  survive  the  winter 
emerge  as  moths  which  ^y  freely  the  folio  »mg  spring.  Consideration  of 
this  fact  makes  it  apparent  that  no  method  of  control  can  be  even  fairly 
satisfactory  unless  all  those  cultivating  corn  in  an  infested  district  co- 
operate to  insure  as  far  as  may  be  possible  the  destruction  of  all  hiber- 
nating insects.  A  few  neglected  gardens  in  any  vicinity  may  harbor 
enough  borers  to  infest  a  wide  area. 

Measures  for  insuring  or  compelling  satisfactory  handling  of  all  infested 
material  are,  therefore,  very  necessary,  and,  while  the  desired  end  might 
possibly  be  obtained  by  local  organizations  of  farmers  and  gardeners  and 
vigorous  action,  it  seems  probable  that  the  matter  must  be  taken  in  hand 
by  the  State  or  Federal  government  if  the  insect  is  to  be  brought  under 
control. 


BULLETIN   No.   179. 


DEPARTMENT  OF  ENTOMOLOGY. 


THE  GREENHOUSE  RED  SPIDER  ATTACKING 

CUCUMBERS  AND  METHODS  FOR 

ITS  CONTROL. 

(Tetranychus  bimaculatus  Harvey.)     (Class,  Arachnida;   Order,  Acarina; 
Family,  Tetranychidcc.) 


BY   STUART   C.  VINAL. 


INTRODUCTION. 

The  minute  spimaing  mites,  commonly  called  red  spiders,  have  long 
been  known  as  among  the  most  troublesome  of  greenhouse  pests,  although 
they  also  cause  a  great  deal  of  damage  to  flowers,  vegetables  and  trees 
growing  out  of  doors.  A  greenhouse  affords  an  almost  ideal  environment 
for  the  development  and  rapid  multiplication  of  red  spiders,  and  as  a 
consequence  we  find  this  pest  taking  advantage  of  the  opportunity  offered 
and  doing  great  damage  to  many  of  the  principal  crops  grown  in  green- 
houses. 

The  production  of  vegetables  under  glass  is  an  expensive  process,  in- 
volving a  large  investment  of  capital  and  a  continual  expense- to  maintain 
such  an  establishment.  To  counterbalance  this  expense  the  value  of  the 
crop  must  be  proportionally  high,  and  anything  which  interferes  with 
the  fullest  development  of  the  plants  reduces  the  profits  materially. 

Without  doubt  the  common  red  spider  {Tetranychus  bimacidatus 
Harvey)  is  the  most  widely  distributed  and  destructive  pest  of  green- 
house cucumbers.  Nowhere  in  America  is  the  cucumber  forcing  industry 
more  highly  developed  than  in  the  market-garden  district  of  Boston, 
Mass.,  and  therefore  the  injury  caused  by  this  pest  assumes  its  greatest 
economic  importance  in  this  section. 

During  the  last  few  years  numerous  inquiries  have  been  received  by 
the  Massachusetts  Experiment  Station  from  market  gardeners  in  regard 
to  the  control  of  red  spiders  attacking  greenhouse  cucumbers.  Because 
of  the  lack  of  an  efficient  method  of  control  very  few  recommendations 


154       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    179. 

could  be  given,  and  in  many  cases  the  injury  by  these  mites  resulted  in 
serious  losses.  Thus  it  soon  became  evident  that  some  line  of  investiga- 
tion should  be  conducted  on  the  control  of  this  mite  attacking  greenhouse 
crops,  and  in  October,  1915,  this  problem  was  assigned  to  me. 

The  investigations  upon  which  this  paper  is  based  were  carried  on  under 
the  direct  supervision  of  Dr.  H.  T.  Fernald.  The  thanks  of  the  ^vTiter 
are  due  Dr.  H.  T.  Fernald,  Dr.  G.  C.  Crampton  and  Dr.  W.  S.  Regan  for 
their  interest  throughout  the  progress  of  the  work.  Acknowledgments 
are  also  due  the  chemistrj^  department  of  the  station  for  its  co-operation, 
expecially  to  Dr.  E.  B.  Holland  for  his  interest  and  careful  manufacture  of 
man}^  complicated  spray  materials  which  led  to  the  discovery  of  an  efficient 
control  for  the  greenhouse  red  spider.  The  writer  is  also  under  obligations 
to  Mr.  H.  F.  Tompson,  professor  of  market  gardening,  for  suggesting 
this  research  and  for  much  valuable  information  concerning  the  efficiency 
of  control  measures  when  used  in  commercial  houses.  To  Mr.  M.  E. 
Moore  of  Arlington  and  Mr.  J.  Winthrop  Stone  of  WatertoAvn  the  writer 
gratefully  acknowledges  his  indebtedness  for  their  kind  co-operation  in 
allowing  promising  materials  to  be  thoroughly  tested  on  a  commercial 
scale  in  their  greenhouses. 

As  this  paper  has  to  deal  primarily  with  the  control  of  the  greenhouse 
red  spider,  other  more  biological  phases  will  be  discussed  only  briefly, 
unless  they  have  a  direct  bearing  upon  control  measures. 

HISTORY  AND   DISTRIBUTION. 

The  greenhouse  red  spider  of  New  England  was  first  described  by 
Harvey  in  1893  as  Tetranychus  bimaculatus.  He  considered  it  distinct 
from  the  European  species  Tetranychus  telarius  Linn.,  and  later  workers 
have  failed  to  prove  conclusively  the  identity  of  these  species. 

The  first  account  of  serious  injury  caused  by  this  mite  in  the  United 
States  came  from  the  New  England  States,  where  it  caused  much  damage 
to  greenhouse  plants.  In  1855  a  mite,  since  described  by  Banks  as  T. 
gloveri,  but  now  known  as  T.  bimaculatus  Harvey,  was  reported  bv  Glover 
as  doing  injury  to  the  cotton  plants  of  the  south.  This  injury  increased 
in  importance,  and  in  1900  the  Bureau  of  Entomology,  United  States 
Department  of  Agriculture,  established  a  southern  laboratory  to  work  on 
the  control  of  this  pest.  With  the  development  of  greenhouses  in  the 
west  the  ravages  of  the  red  spider  soon  appeared  and  caused  serious 
damage  to  greenhouse  plants  as  well  as  to  many  cultivated  garden  plants 
and  fruit  trees.  A  closely  related  mite  has  long  been  a  serious  pest  of 
hop  plants  in  Europe;  therefore  it  is  not  surprising  that  our  species  of 
red  spider  assumes  a  great  importance  in  seriously  damaging  hop  fields 
both  in  the  east  and  far  west. 

The  red  spider,  therefore,  is  very  generally  distributed  throughout  the 
United  States,  extending  from  Maine  to  Florida  and  westward  to  Texas 
and  California,  only  a  few  States  in  the  western  arid  region  being  exempt 
from  the  ravages  of  this  pest. 


GREENHOUSE    RED    SPIDER.  155 


FOOD  PLANTS. 

Telranychus  bimaculatus  is  very  cosmopolitan  in  its  feeding  habits, 
having  been  listed  by  McGregor  as  feeding  on  183  species  of  plants, 
55  per  cent,  of  which  were  cultivated,  in  the  southeastern  part  of  the 
United  States.  Much  confusion  has  arisen  because  of  the  large  number 
of  host  plants  and  the  variability  in  color  of  mites  feeding  on  these  different 
plants.  New  species  have  been  described  based  upon  these  color  varia- 
tions, but  they  have  been  discarded  by  later  workers  as  synonymous. 

Under  New  England  conditions  of  climate  the  red  spider  as  a  rule  does 
not  seriously  damage  plants  except  those  which  are  usually  grown  in 
greenhouses.  A  few  exceptions  to  this  statement  may  occur  near  badly 
infested  greenhouses  or  during  very  dry  seasons.  As  this  paper  has  to 
deal  with  greenhouse  control,  only  those  plants  found  most  often  infested 
in,  and  in  the  vicinity  of,  greenhouses  will  be  enumerated. 

The  greenhouse  vegetables  most  subject  to  attack  are  (1)  cucumbers, 

(2)  egg  plants  and  (3)  tomatoes. 

Cucumbers  grown  under  glass  in  the  market-garden  district  of  Boston 
are  rarely  exempt  from  the  attacks  of  red  spiders.  These  plants  are  first 
attacked  when  only  two  leaves  have  unfolded,  and  injury  continues  until 
the  death  of  the  plant,  which  in  the  majority  of  cases  is  due  primarily  to 
the  removal  of  chlorophyll  from  its  leaves  by  the  mites.  Egg  plants, 
although  very  susceptible  to  attack,  are  not  generally  gro%vn  in  the  vicinity 
of  Boston.  Greenhouse  tomatoes  appear  to  be  practically  immune  from 
red  spider  injury  except  when  very  young.  Several  times  the  writer  has 
seen  a  greenhouse  containing  approximately  1,500  full-grown  cucumber 
plants,  with  a  row  of  tomatoes  planted  at  each  end  of  the  house.  The 
cucumber  plants  were  rapidly  dying  from  the  injuries  caused  by  millions 
of  red  spiders,  while  the  tomatoes  remained  unaffected.  This  was  an 
extremely  severe  infestation,  and  shows  to  what  extent  greenhouse  to- 
matoes are  immune.  Almost  all  weeds  found  in  infested  greenhouses 
harbor  mites,  and  if  not  destroyed  are  liable  to  infect  a  following  crop. 

The  greenhouse  flowers  subject  to  attack  are   (1)  roses,   (2)  violets, 

(3)  sweet  peas,  (4)  carnations,  (5)  chrysanthemums  and  (6)  many  others 
of  minor  importance. 

In  floriculture  perhaps  the  most  important  infestations  occur  on  roses 
and  violets,  with  sweet  peas,  carnations  and  chrysanthemums  next  in 
order.  Usually  a  very  large  number  of  widely  differing  plants  are  grown 
in  a  florist's  greenhouse,  and  many  of  these  will  become  more  or  less 
seriously  infested  by  the  migration  of  mites  from  one  or  more  of  the  above- 
mentioned  plants.  However,  these  infestations  are  usually  not  of  great 
importance. 

The  plants  in  the  vicinity  of  greenhouses  subject  to  attack  are  (1) 
beans,  (2)  egg  plants,  (3)  celery,  (4)  tomatoes,  (5)  strawberries,  (6)  clover, 
(7)  grasses  and  (8)  weeds. 

Plants  subject  to  attack  which  are  found  near  greenhouses  may  serve 


156       MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    179. 

as  sources  of  inside  infestation,  or  may  in  turn  become  infested  from 
plants  or  parts  of  plants  thrown  out  of  the  greenhouse  during  or  after  an 
infestation.  The  most  important  garden  crops  attacked  are  the  bean, 
egg  plant  and  celery.  Tomatoes  grown  out  of  doors  are  more  susceptible 
to  red  spider  injury  than  when  grown  in  greenhouses.  Strawberry  plants 
are  also  subject  to  attack,  but  usually  this  does  not  assume  great  im- 
portance under  New  England  climatic  conditions.  The  most  important 
plants,  as  far  as  the  greenhouse  man  is  concerned,  are  those  found  around 
most  greenhouses,  consisting  of  clover,  grasses  and  weeds,  as  these  are 
undoubtedly  important  factors  in  causing  inside  infestation. 

NATURE  OF  INJURY  TO  CUCUMBERS. 

The  first  signs  of  injury  appear  soon  after  the  plants  have  been  trans- 
planted in  the  greenhouse,  and  in  the  majority  of  cases  on  the  oldest, 
basal  leaves.  The  pests  usually  attack  the  leaves  of  a  cucumber  plant 
progressively;  that  is,  the  older,  basal  leaves  first  show  injury,  then  those 
just  above  are  attacked,  and  thus  the  ravages  of  the  pest  progress  upward 
as  the  plant  grows.  As  a  general  rule  very  young,  hairy  leaves  around 
the  terminal  shoot  are  exempt  from  attack  until  the  plant  becomes  very 
heavily  infested. 

The  injury  is  caused  by  the  puncturing  of  the  under  surface  of  the  leaf 
and  the  extraction  of  the  liquid  contents  of  the  leaf  cells  immediately  sur- 
rounding the  puncture,  which  results  in  a  very  characteristic  and  notice- 
able injury.  In  the  process  of  feeding,  the  green  chlorophyll  is  withdrawn, 
leaving  a  small  dead  area  which  soon  appears  on  the  upper  surface  of  the 
leaf  as  a  small  whitish  speck.  As  the  mites  continue  feeding,  the  removal 
of  chlorophyll  and  specking  increases  until  ultimately  the  leaf  becomes 
yellowish,  lifeless  and  useless  for  food  assimilation. 

The  characteristic  red  spider  injury  is  quite  easily  recognized,  even  in 
its  early  stages  of  development.  The  normal  leaf  is  opaque,  allowing 
no  light  to  pass  through  it,  while  around  hijured  areas  considerable  light 
passes  through  the  leaf  tissue,  due  to  the  lack  of  chlorophyll  in  this  vicinity. 
The  contrast  between  the  opaque  normal  leaf  tissue  and  the  lightness 
seen  around  affected  areas  is  especially  noticeable  when  the  cucumber 
plants  have  become  full-grown  and  have  leaves  and  terminal  shoots 
running  over  the  top  wires,  for  at  this  time  the  leaves  are  between  the 
source  of  light  and  the  observer  walking  beneath  them.  The  appearance 
on  the  upper  surface  of  the  minute,  pitted  dead  specks  or  spots,  usually 
arranged  in  clusters,  will  also  point  to  infested  areas. 

ECONOMIC  IMPORTANCE   QF  THE  PEST   ON  CUCUMBERS. 

The  damage  caused  by  red  spiders  in  cucumber  houses  varies  in  severity. 
The  factors  influencing  this  have  not  been  determined,  but  at  least  they 
are  very  complicated.  The  severest  injury  seems  to  occur  in  houses 
containing  a  light  sandy  soil,  while  houses  having  heavj^  soils  are  better 


GREENHOUSE   RED    SPIDER,  157 

able  to  withstand  the  attacks  of  this  pest.  Nearly  every  cucumber  grower 
in  the  Boston  district,  so  far  as  the  writer  has  been  able  to  determine,  is 
forced  to  fight  red  spiders  in  order  to  bring  his  crop  to  maturity.  In  many 
cases  whole  houses  of  j'oung  cucumber  plants  have  been  destroyed  with 
sulfur  fumes  because  the  mites  were  so  numerous  and  the  injuries  so 
severe  that  it  was  deemed  wise  by  the  grower  to  destroy  the  plants  and 
reset  the  house.  The  usual  methods  used  by  greenhouse  men  to  combat 
this  pest  consist  of  severe  pruning  of  infested  plants  and  spraying  with 
as  strong  a  stream  of  water  as  these  delicate  plants  will  stand,  repeating 
this  as  often  as  possible  without  allowing  mildew  to  seriously  injure  the 
leaves.  In  nearly  all  cases  the  mites  win  out  in  the  struggle  for  existence, 
and  shorten  the  life  of  a  cucumber  plant  over  one  month.  Under  normal 
conditions  the  plant  should  bear  a  large  amount  of  fruit  during  this  time. 
The  loss,  therefore,  to  cucumber  men  by  red  spider  infestation  is  due  to 
shortening  the  life  of  the  plant  during  its  productive  period. 

A  conservative  estimate  of  the  value  of  the  cucumber  crop  grown 
within  the  market-garden  district  of  Boston  is  Sl,500,000  per  season. 
The  cucumber  growers  suffer  a  loss  of  approximately  $150,000,  or  10  per 
cent,  of  the  whole  crop,  from  the  ravages  of  the  red  spider  alone.  Many 
individual  growers  have  estimated  their  loss  between  $2,000  and  $5,000 
annually. 

LIFE  HISTORY. 

An  examination  of  infested  cucumbers  will  reveal  the  presence  of  tiny 
transparent  eggs,  resembling  minute  dewdrops,  attached  to  the  under 
surface  of  a  leaf  or  interwoven  among  the  silvery  threads  which  the  mites 
are  capable  of  spinning.  In  developing  from  the  egg  to  the  adult  stage 
the  red  spider  follows  one  of  two  distinct  courses,  depending  on  the  sex. 

With  the  female  the  egg  hatches  in  about  four  or  five  days  to  a  tiny 
colorless,  six-legged  form  kno^vn  as  the  larva,  which  feeds  actively  for  a 
little  over  one  day.  At  the  end  of  this  time  the  larva  becomes  firmly 
attached  to  the  leaf  and  enters  a  quiescent  premolting  period  which  lasts 
for  one  day.  At  the  termination  of  this  time  the  skin  is  shed  and  there 
appears  an  eight-legged  form  called  the  primary  nymph  or  protonymph, 
which  feeds  for  approximately  one  day  and  then  enters  a  quiescent  pre- 
molting period.  The  duration  of  this  period  is  approximately  the  same  as 
that  of  the  larval  quiescent  stage.  From  this  premolting  period  there 
emerges  the  secondary  nymph  or  deutonyrnph,  which  is  probably  the 
most  voracious  of  the  immature  mites.  The  deutonymphal  stage  is 
divided  into  an  active  feeding  period  and  a  quiescent  period,  each  of 
which  requires  one  day  for  its  completion,  after  which  the  adult  female 
emerges  from  the  deutonymphal  molt.  For  the  development  from  egg 
to  adult  it  takes  seven  to  eight  days  under  favorable  conditions  of  tem- 
perature. (See  table  on  page  159.)  The  stages  of  the  female  red  spider 
and  their  duration  may  be  represented  as  follows :  — 

Tr„fr  ToT-n-a       Quiescent      Proto-        Quiescent        Deuto-       Quiescent       aj,  u  o 

iLgg.  l.arva.  j  nymph.  II.  nymph.  III.  "^^"'t  ?• 

-I 1 1 1r— i  I 1 


4-5  days.    1}^  days.      1  day.        IJ^  days.         IM  days.      IJ^  days.  1  day.       15-20  days. 


158       MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    179. 

Immediately  following  the  deutonymphal  molt  the  full-grown  female 
establishes  herself  upon  a  cucumber  leaf  and  feeds  for  about  two  or  three 
days  before  oviposition  takes  place.     During  this  short  period  it  mates 


^<^en7   U 


and  shows  a  tendency  to  migrate.  Following  this  period  for  about  eight 
to  ten  days  it  deposits  about  six  eggs  per  day,  thus  making  a  total  of 
fifty  to  sixty  eggs  laid  by  a  single  female.  The  average  duration  of  life 
of  the  adult  female  in  summer  is  about  two  weeks,  but  this  period  in- 
creases as  the  weather  becomes  colder. 

The  development  of  the  male  is  verj^  similar  to  that  of  the  female,  with 
the  exception  that  the  second  nymphal  stage  is  lacking.  The  other  stages, 
however,  require  a  little  longer  period  for  development,  so  that  the  time 
from  the  egg  to  the  adult  is  only  one  day  shorter  than  the  development 
of  the  female.  The  different  stages  of  development  and  the  length  of 
each  stage  of  the  male  red  spider  may  bo  represented  as  follows:  — 


Egg. 


Larva. 


Quiescent  I. 
-I  I 


Nymph. 


Quiescent  II.        Adult  (f. 


4-5  clays. 


days. 


134  days. 


days. 


IJ4  days. 


5-7  days. 


GREENHOUSE    RED    SPIDER. 


159 


Development  of  Female  Mite  from  Egg  to  Adult. 


Date. 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

1916. 

May  21,  a.m., 

P.M., 

Hatched. 

Hatched. 

Hatched. 

- 

May  22, 

A.M., 
P.M., 

Larva. 
Larva. 

Larva. 
Larva. 

Larva. 
Larva. 

Hatched. 
Larva. 

May  23, 

A.M., 
P.M., 

Quiescent  I. 
Quiescent  I. 

Larva. 
Quiescent  I. 

Quiescent  I. 
Quiescent  I. 

Larva. 
Quiescent  I. 

May  24, 

A.M., 
P.M., 

Molted. 
Protonymph. 

Quiescent  I. 
Molted. 

Molted. 
Protonymph. 

Quiescent  I. 
Molted. 

May  25, 

A.M., 
P.M., 

Protonymph. 
Quiescent  IL 

Protonymph. 
Protonymph. 

Protonymph. 
Quiescent  II. 

Protonymph. 
Protonymph. 

May  26, 

A.M., 
P.M., 

Quiescent  IL 
Molted. 

Quiescent  II. 
Molted. 

Molted.  • 
Deutonymph. 

Quiescent  II. 
Quiescent  II. 

May  27, 

A.M., 
P.M., 

Deutonymph. 
Quiescent  IIL 

Deutonymph. 
Deutonymph. 

Deutonymph. 
Quiescent  III. 

Molted. 
Deutonymph. 

May  28, 

A.M., 
P.M., 

Quiescent  III. 
Molted  (adult  5). 

Quiescent  III. 
Quiescent  III. 

Quiescent  III. 
Molted  (adult  9). 

Quiescent  III. 
Quiescent  III. 

May  29, 

A.M., 
P.M., 

- 

Molted  (adult  $). 

- 

Molted  (adult  ?). 

FEEDING  HABITS  AND   DISPERSION. 

A  mite  which  has  become  full-grown,  on  finding  a  suitable  spot  on  the 
under  surface  of  the  leaf,  settles  down  to  feed,  and  the  results  soon  become 
apparent  on  the  upper  surface.  At  first  this  injury  shows  as  a  few  small 
dead  or  corky  specks,  but  as  feeding  continues  these  few  are  added  to 
until  we  find  a  small  area  literally  made  up  of  them.  The  mite  also  im- 
mediately begins  to  lay  eggs,  which  soon  hatch  into  young  mites.  These, 
however,  usually  remain  feeding  in  the  immediate  vicinity  of  their  birth, 
thus  causing  more  or  less  concentrated  injury  at  different  points  on  the 
leaf  where  older  mites  have  established  themselves,  formmg  what  might 
be  termed  different  colonies.  As  these  colonies  increase  in  number  the 
feeding  areas  also  increase,  until  fi.nally  they  coalesce  and  cover  prac- 
tically the  whole  leaf.  This  is  now  absolutely  useless  to  the  plant  and 
worthless  as  a  food  supply  for  the  large  number  of  mites  which  inhabit  it, 
and  they  therefore  migrate  to  other  leaves.  This  migration  may  be  up 
the  plant  or  may  extend  to  the  next  plant,  provided  their  leaves  are  in 
contact.  This  new  plant  may  have  hitherto  escaped  injury  so  that  the 
basal  leaves  remain  uninjured,  while  an  infestation  occurs  part  way  up 
the  plant.  In  natural  dispersion  the  migration  is  nearly  always  by  full- 
grown  females  previous  to  the  egg-laying  period.  In  the  majority  of  cases 
dispersion  within  a  greenhouse  is  accomplished  wholly  by  natural  agencies. 

In  artificial  dispersion  the  most  important  factors  are  the  men  engaged 
in  pruning,  picking  or  "rolling  up"  cucumber  plants.  Thej^  pass  from 
an  infested  to  a  non-infested  plant,  but  carry  over  infestation  on  their 
clothing,  hands  or  tools.    This  means  of  dispersion  becomes  exceedingly 


160       MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    179. 

important  when  the  plants  have  become  so  badly  infested  that  webs 
have  been  spun  over  the  leaves,  as  the  pickers  passing  from  one  house  to 
another  carry  infestation  with  them.    . 

NATURAL  ENEMIES. 

Red  spiders  out  of  doors  have  a  very  large  number  of  enemies  be- 
longing to  widely  different  groups,  nine  groups  of  predacious  forms  em- 
bracing thirty-one  species  having  been  listed  (McGregor,  1917)  as  attack- 
ing the  red  spider.  Under  greenhouse  conditions,  however,  red  spiders  are 
exceptionally  free  from  enemies.  It  appears  that  the  red  spider  enemies 
are  unable  to  develop  in  the  high  temperatures  which  are  necessary  for 
most  greenhouse  crops.  In  cucumber  houses  the  wi'iter  has  repeatedly 
examined  infested  leaves  in  the  hope  that  some  enemy  would  be  found 
able  to  withstand  greenhouse  conditions  and  prove  useful  in  the  control 
of  this  mite,  but  these  examinations  have  proved  fruitless.  On  violets 
which  are  gro%vn  in  a  humid  atmosphere  and  at  a  low  temperature,  a  few 
predaceous  mites  belonging  to  the  order  Acarina,  family  Gamasidcc,  are 
very  beneficial. 

INTRODUCTION  TO   EXPERIMENTS. 

Before  taking  up  the  experiments  conducted  on  the  artificial  control 
of  red  spiders  a  few  facts  will  be  summarized  in  order  that  the  failure  of 
some  fumigants  and  sprays  may  be  better  understood. 

Cucumber  plants  grown  out  of  doors  are  very  delicate  and  susceptible 
to  injury  of  many  kinds,  while  those  grown  in  forcing  houses  are  much 
more  so.  Therefore  the  sprays  and  fumigants  which  can  be  used  with 
safety  to  the  foliage  are  very  few,  while  the  red  spiders  are  exceptionally 
hard  pests  to  combat.  These  two  opposing  factors  have  been  found 
extremely  hard  to  satisfy. 

Many  greenhouse  men  ask  the  following  question,  "Why  is  fumigation 
not  effective  in  controlling  red  spiders?"  It  has  been  known  for  many 
years  that  these  mites  are  very  resistant  to  fumigation  with  our  ordinary 
poisonous  gases,  such  as  tobacco  and  hydrocyanic  acid  gas.  To  explain 
this  peculiarity  we  must  contrast  the  respiratory  systems,  through  which 
all  poisonous  gases  act,  of  mites  and  insects.  The  latter  are  efficiently 
controlled,  while  only  a  very  few  of  the  former  succumb  to  such  treatment. 

In  insects  the  respiratory  system  is  composed  of  several  large  main 
air  tubes  which  repeatedly  divide,  forming  very  small  tubes  which  ramify 
into  all  parts  of  the  body.  This  system  of  tracheal  tubes  opens  to  the 
exterior  by  several  small  segmentally  arranged  openings  called  spiracles, 
and  through  these  the  poisonous  gas  enters  the  air  tubes,  which  conduct 
it  to  every  tissue  in  the  body,  and  produces  sudden  death. 

Although  the  tracheal  system  of  the  red  spider  is  better  developed  than 
in  most  mites,  it  is  far  simpler  than  in  the  majority  of  insects,  containing 
a  much  smaller  number  of  tubes. 


GREENHOUSE    RED    SPIDER.  161 

The  number  and  location  of  the  spiracles  in  red  spiders  have  not  been 
determined  because  of  their  minuteness,  but  they  are  probably  two  in 
number  and  are  situated  in  the  vicinity  of  the  head  region.  Therefore, 
although  the  red  spider  can  be  killed  by  fumigation  with  hydrocyanic 
acid  gas,  it  is  impossible  to  do  so  without  severely  damaging  plant  life, 
due  to  the  concentration  of  the  poisonous  gas  required. 

An  infested  plant  has  at  all  times  every  developmental  stage  of  the 
red  spider  on  its  leaves,  but  in  artificial  control  methods  we  need  to  con- 
sider only  three  general  stages. 

1.  Egg  Stage.  —  At  the  present  time  no  spray  is  known  which  will 
affect  this  stage  without  severely  injuring  the  plant. 

2.  Quiescent  Stage.  —  As  explained  under  the  life  history,  the  young 
larva?  on  hatching  feed  for  a  day,  and  then  settle  down  on  the  leaf  in  a 
premolting  or  quiescent  state  during  which  time  no  nourishment  is  taken. 
These  quiescent  mites  form  a  new  chitinous  layer  beneath  the  old  external 
skin  covering  of  the  preceding  stage.  Thus  during  this  period  a  red 
spider  has  two  chitinous  layers  covering  the  body  instead  of  the  normal 
one,  and  because  of  this  it  has  been  found  very  difficult  to  kill  by  contact 
sprays.  By  reference  to  the  life  history  it  will  be  seen  that  each  female 
mite  passes  through  three  of  these  quiescent  periods  before  reaching  the 
adult  state.  If  red  spiders  in  this  stage  of  development  are  not  killed  by 
the  spray  material  recommended  for  control,  it  will  be  almost  impossible 
to  eradicate  this  pest  unless  sprayings  are  conducted  daily. 

As  soon  as  the  spray  applied  to  an  infested  plant  has  evaporated,  the 
mites  will  be  found  inactive,  and  many  workers  have  concluded  that  all 
mites  above  the  egg  stage  have  been  killed.  However,  if  the  leaves  were 
kept  under  careful  observation  it  would  be  seen  that  many  of  the  mites 
quiescent  at  the  time  of  application  later  molt  and  establish  themselves. 
This  point  has  been  overlooked  by  former  workers  on  the  control  of  red 
spiders,  but  is  a  very  important  one. 

3.  Feeding  Stages.  —  A  large  number  of  spray  materials  efficiently 
control  mites  in  the  active  feeding  stages,  but  because  of  their  inefficient 
control  of  the  quiescent  stages  have  been  discarded. 


EXPERIMENTS  CONDUCTED  IN  THE  LABORATORY. 

Fumigation  Experiments. 

Several  fumigation  experiments  were  conducted  in  the  hope  that  some 
gas  might  be  found  effective  for  red  spiders  without  being  injurious  to 
cucumber  plants. 

(a)     Sulfur  Dioxide  (SO2). 

In  many  commercial  forcing  houses '  sulfur  is  burned  between  crops, 
in  order  to  rid  the  house  of  all  insects,  fungous  diseases  and  mites.  To 
prove  whether  this  was  an  efficient  method,  the  following  experiments 
were  performed. 


162       MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION    BULLETIN    179. 

Powdered  sulfur  was  burned  at  the  rate  of  one-quarter  of  a  i:)ound  per 
1,000  cubic  feet  of  space  in  a  tight  fumigating  box  containing  a  badly 
infested  plant.    After  twelve  hours'  fumigation  the  plant  was  removed. 

Results.  —  The  cucumber  plant  was  severely  injured  and  died.  All 
mites  were  killed,  those  quiescent  failed  to  molt  and  the  eggs  did  not 
hatch.  This  experiment  was  repeated  several  times  and  the  results 
checked  with  those  above. 

Fumigation  with  sulfur  dioxide  is  an  inexpensive  and  efficient  method 
of  ridding  an  infested  house  of  mites  between  crops. 

Painting  Sulfur  on  Steam  Pipes.  —  This  is  an  old  practice  of  florists  in 
combating  the  red  spider,  but  has  been  proved  beyond  a  doubt  to  be 
absolutely  worthless. 

(6)     Hydrogen  Sulfid  (HoS). 

Potassium  sulfid  (liver  of  sulfur)  dissolved  in  water  has  been  widely 
recommended  as  an  efficient  spray  for  controlling  red  spiders,  and  it  is 
claimed  that  its  efficiency  depends  upon  the  fact  that  it  combines  with 
the  carbon  dioxide  of  the  air,  forming  potassium  carbonate  and  hydrogen 
sulfid  according  to  the  following  formula:  — 

Monosulfid:  KsS  +  HiO  +  CO2  =  K2CO3  +  H2S. 
Polysulfid:    K2S5  +  H2O  +  CO2  =  K2CO3  +  H2S  +  4S. 

As  an  insecticide  it  is  claimed  that  this  sulfid  acts  by  virtue  of  its  caustic 
properties  and  the  hydrogen  sulfid  given  off  by  its  decomposition,  this 
gas  being  for  insects  almost  as  poisonous  as  hydrocyanic  acid  gas. 

To  determine  whether  hydrogen  sulfid  could  be  used  with  safety  to 
plants  and  still  be  effective  in  killing  red  spiders  the  following  experiment 
was  performed:  a  plant  infested  with  mites  was  placed  for  twelve  hours 
in  a  fumigating  box  containing  a  1  per  cent,  atmosphere  of  hydrogen 
sulfid. 

Results.  —  The  plant  was  severely  injured  and  died,  while  the  mites 
and  eggs  were  unaffected. 

(c)     Carbon  Bisulfid  (CS2). 

Experiments  using  carbon  bisulfid  at  the  rate  of  2  pounds  per  1,000 
cubic  feet  proved  to  be  inefficient  in  controlling  the  mites  even  after  a 
twelve-hour  fumigation.  The  plants  in  this  case  were  not  injured.  Carbon 
bisulfid  at  a  higher  rate  would  be  too  expensive  to  use  in  commercial 
houses,  and  therefore  further  experiments  were  discontinued. 

(d)     Benzene  or  Benzol  (CeHe). 

Early  in  the  experiments  on  the  control  of  red  spiders  it  was  found 
that  benzene  vapor  had  a  very  active  effect  upon  the  mites.  However, 
this  proved  to  be  only  a  temporary  stupefication,  and  mites  which  had 


GREENHOUSE   RED    SPIDER.  163 

been  removed  from  the  fumigating  box  containing  benzene  vapor  soon 
recovered  in  fresh  air.  The  expense  and  danger  accompanying  the  use 
of  benzene  precludes  its  use  on  a  commercial  scale. 

Nitrobenzene  and  para-dichlorobenzene  were  experimentally  used  as 
fumigants,  but  proved  to  be  as  unsatisfactory  as  benzene,  while  nitro- 
benzene severely  injured  foliage. 

Spraying  Experiments. 

At  present  the  only  kno\\ai  method  of  controlling  red  spiders  is  by 
the  use  of  sprays.  The  majority  of  these  act  as  adhesive  sprays,  while 
only  a  few  are  truly  contact  poisons. 

(a)     Water. 

Water  alone  has  been  found  very  useful  in  the  control  of  this  pest  on 
certain  plants,  such  as  the  carnation,  violet  and  rose.  The  usefulness 
of  a  water  spray  lies  in  the  fact  that  frequent  syringing  dislodges  many 
mites  from  the  leaves.  The  majority  of  these  fall  to  the  moist  ground 
and  become  permanently  pasted  into  the  mud.  Frequent  use  of  water 
also  prevents  the  formation  of  webs,  which  are  quite  necessary  as  a  means 
of  travel  and  dispersal  when  a  leaf  becomes  thickly  populated.  Although 
water  is  very  useful  in  controlling  these  mites  on  certain  plants,  others 
cannot  be  gro-uii  in  a  humid  atmosphere  without  being  seriously  attacked 
by  fungous  diseases,  and  this  is  especially  true  of  cucumber  plants.  The 
tenderness  of  the  forcing  house  cucumber  also  limits  the  usefulness  of  a 
strong  stream  of  water. 

(b)     Adhesive  Sprays. 

1.  Flour  Paste.  —  Perhaps  the  most  widely  known  and  thoroughly 
tried  adhesive  spray  is  flour  paste,  recommended  by  W.  B.  Parker  (1913) 
in  controlling  mites  attacking  hops  in  the  Sacramento  Valley,  Cal.  He 
found  that  flour  paste  made  according  to  the  following  formula  proved 
to  effectively  control  99  to  100  per  cent,  of  the  mites:  8  pounds  of  flour 
boiled  in  8  gallons  of  water  to  form  a  paste,  and  diluted  to  make  100 
gallons  of  spray. ^ 

In  order  to  obtain  an  accurate  estimate  of  the  effectiveness  of  ^his 
spray  when  used  on  cucumbers  the  following  experiment  was  performed: 
a  stock  solution  of  flour  paste  was  made  and  diluted  according  to  Parker's 
formula.    This  spray  was  applied  thoroughly  to  an  infested  plant. 

Results.  —  The  spraj''  has  excellent  spreading  qualities,  and  as  an 
adhesive  is  quite  efficient  in  controlling  all  mites  which  at  the  time  of 
sprajdng  are  actively  feeding.  However,  this  spray  does  not  affect  either 
the  hatching  of  the  eggs  or  the  emergence  of  the  mites  from  the  quiescent 
stages. 

>  In  a  recent  government  bulletin  McGregor  and  McDonough  recommend  the  use  of  laundry 
starch,  thus  simplifying  the  process  of  cooking  in  forming  the  stock  paste  solution. 


164       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    179. 

2.  Soap.  —  The  addition  of  soap  to  a  spray  material  increases  its 
spreading  qualities  and  at  the  same  time  adds  to  its  adhesive  properties. 
For  red  spider  control  soap  is  inefficient  as  a  contact  poison,  but  if  used 
in  fairly  concentrated  solutions  it  proves  to  be  an  excellent  adhesive 
spray. 

Ivory  soap  used  at  the  rate  of  1^  pounds  in  25  gallons  of  water  was 
tried  as  a  spray  and  found  to  be  as  effective  as  flour  paste  (8-8-100),  with 
the  advantage  of  being  much  easier  to  make  and  not  requiring  constant 
agitation. 

Results.  —  After  this  spray  has  been  applied  the  water  evaporates,  leav- 
ing a  brittle  film  of  soap  over  the  mites,  which  is  fairly  efficient  in  sticking 
these  pests  to  the  leaves.  However,  nearly  all  mites  which  are  in  the 
quiescent  stage  molt  and  establish  themselves,  and  quite  a  few  of  the 
actively  feeding  mites  are  able  to  break  the  brittle  film  of  soap  covering 
their  bodies  and  thus  become  liberated  to  feed  on  the  leaf  as  before.  The 
eggs  are  not  affected. 

A  common  brand  of  fish  oil  soap,  at  the  rate  of  1  pound  in  10  gallons 
of  water,  was  applied  to  mites  on  cucumbers.  The  efficiency  of  this  over 
ordinary  soap  proved  to  be  very  little,  if  any. 


(c)     Sulfur  and  Compounds  of  Sulfur. 

Sulfur  and  many  of  its  compounds  have  been  recommended  for  the 
control  of  red  spiders  attacking  varix)us  plants.  The  following  have 
been  tried  thoroughly,  but  have  proved,  for  the  most  part,  inefficient. 

1.  Dry  Sulfur.  —  In  southern  California,  where  the  temperature  is 
high,  dusting  plants  early  in  the  morning  so  that  the  dew  on  foliage 
will  cause  the  particles  of  sulfur  to  adhere  has  been  found  very»  suc- 
cessful, especially  upon  low-growing  plants.  The  use  of  resublimed 
or  flowers  of  sulfur  on  plants  which  are  not  prostrate  has  proved  very 
unsatisfactory  as  a  control  for  red  spiders.  Many  of  the  market  gardeners 
of  Boston  have  thoroughly  tried  out  this  method  without  any  material 
success.  Several  experiments  were  conducted,  but  dusting  did  not  seem 
to  affect  the  red  spiders  in  the  least,  even  though  the  temperature  was 
high. 

2.  Sulfur  as  a  Liquid  Spray.  —  This  spray  has  been  recommended  for 
controlling  red  spiders,  but  experimentally  proves  to  be  of  very  little 
value. 

3.  Sulfur  Compounds,  (a)  Potassium  Sulfid  (Liver  of  Sulfur)  KgS.  — 
This  spray  has  been  recommended  by  McGregor  as  being  very  effective 
in  controlling  red  spiders  attacking  cotton.  Using  3  pounds  of  potassium 
sulfid  to  100  gallons  of  water,  McGregor  found  that  100  per  cent,  of  the 
mites  on  cotton  were  killed  by  this  spray.  This  is  an  easily  prepared 
material  Vv'hich  may  be  applied  with  safety  to  foliage,  but  at  the  present 
time,  on  account  of  the  increasing  demand  for  potassium  salts  for  use  in 
the  manufacture  of  munitions  and  fertilizers,  this  is  very  difficult  to 


GREENHOUSE   RED    SPIDER.  165 

obtain,  while  the  price  is  rather  high.  In  using  this  material  on  cucumbers 
it  is  necessary  to  add  soap  to  the  solution  in  order  to  increase  its  spreading 
qualities. 

Results.  —  This  ^ray  proved  to  be  efficient  in  controlling  actively 
feeding  mites,  but  only  a  few  of  those  quiescent  failed  to  molt.  The  eggs 
were  not  affected. 

(b)  Calcium  Sulfid  (CaS2).  —  This  spray  proved  to  be  of  little  value 
as  it  killed  but  few  mites.  Soap  cannot  be  added  to  this  solution  as  it 
forms  an  insoluble  calcium  soap  which  is  precipitated.  Had  this  material 
proved  of  value  it  could  be  obtained  more  cheaply  in  lime-sulfur,  of  which 
it  is  a  constituent,  than  in  the  form  of  the  pure  white  calcium  sulfid. 

(c)  Sodium  Sidfid  (NajS).  —  To  determine  whether  a  substitute  for 
potassium  sulfid  could  be  obtained  by  the  use  of  sodium  sulfid,  a  spray 
was  made  by  the  following  formula:  — 

Pounds. 
Commercial  NaOH,  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  •     '^h 

Flowers  of  sulfur,    .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  •  .  .5 

After  solution  is  complete  add  water  to  make  100  gallons  of  spray. 

Results.  —  Although  this  spray  proved  to  be  as  effective  in  killing  all 
actively  feeding  mites  as  did  the  potassium  sulfid  solution,  its  effect  on  the 
quiescent  stages  was  materially  less.    The  eggs  were  not  injured. 

(d)  Sohible  Sulf^ir.  —  This  is  a  commercial  compound  made  up  prin- 
cipally of  sodium  sulfid,  and  as  a  spray  the  results  check  with  those  given 
above,  with  the  exception  that  this  spray  is  very  apt  to  injure  the  foliage. 

(e)  Barium  Sulfur  (B.  T.  S.).  —  This  material,  used  at  the  rate  of  3 
pounds  to  50  gallons  of  water,  is  not  injurious  to  foliage,  but  is  inefficient 
in  controlling  mites.  Soap  cannot  be  added,  as  it  forms  an  insoluble 
barium  soap. 

(/)  Lime-sidfur  and  Kico-jume  Liquid.  —  This  has  been  recommended 
as  a  spray  for  spider  mites  as  well  as  the  clover  mite  (Bryobia),  and  has 
the  f ollomng  composition :  — 

Lime-sulfur,  commercial  (quarts),       ........       2 

Nico-fimie  (pint),    ...........         i 

Water  (gallons),       ...........     25 

Results.  —  The  application  of  this  material  caused  considerable  injury 
to  the  cucumber  foliage,  while  it  was  only  fairly  efficient  in  controlling 
the  mites.  Several  greenhouse  men  have  sprayed  -with  dilute  lime-sulfur 
solution,  but  have  found  it  both  inefficient  in  controlling  these  pests  and 
injurious  to  the  foliage.  Nicotine  sprays  are  also  inefficient  when  used 
alone. 

(d)     Oil  Sprays. 

1.  Sprays  containing  Petroleum  Oils,  (a)  Arlington  Oil.  —  This  is  a 
chemically  miscible  oil  containing  approximately  90  per  cent,  petroleum 
oil.    Used  at  the  rate  of  1  part  oil  in  50  parts  of  water  it  was  found  effective 


166       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    179. 


in  controlling  aphids  and  thrips,  but  killed  only  50  per  cent,  of  the  actively- 
feeding  mites.  At  the  above  strength  this  spray  severely  injured  cucumber 
foliage,  and  even  when  diluted  to  1  part  oil  in  100  parts  of  water,  injury 
still  occurred.  ' 

(h)  Arlington  Oil  and  Black-Lea  J- J^O.  —  Formula:  oil,  1  part  to  125 
parts  of  water;  Black-Leaf-40,  1  part  to  2,000  parts  of  water.  This  com- 
bination spray  is  much  more  active  than  the  ingredients  used  separately, 
but  is  injurious  to  the  cucumber  foliage. 

(c)  Kerosene  Emulsion.  —  This  is  recommended  as  being  efficient  in 
controlling  red  spiders,  but  it  severely  injures  tender  foliage. 

2.  Sprays  containing  Vegetable  Oils,  (a)  Lemon  Oil.  —  This  is  manu- 
factured by  the  Lemon  Oil  Company,  Baltimore,  Md.,  and. is  at  present 
sold  at  $1.75  per  gallon  in  5-gallon  lots.  It  is  a  completely  saponified 
oil  soap,  and  is  guaranteed  to  contain  the  following  ingredients:  — 

Per  Cent. 
Soap,    .............        6 


Vegetable  oil, 
Potassium  carbonate, 
Terabenthine  (Turpentine?), 
Water  (not  over), 


3i 

5 

85 


Of  the  many  commercial  insecticides  used  experimentally  m  the  control 
of  red  spiders  this  proved  the  most  satisfactory. 

Results.  —  Used  at  the  strength  of  1  part  lemon  oil  in  20  parts  of  water, 
or  1  pint  in  2^  gallons  of  water,  it  killed  all  actively  feeding  mites,  as 
well  as  those  in  the  quiescent  stage,  without  injuring  the  foliage.  The 
eggs  are  not  materially  affected  by  this  spray.  If  young  potted  cucumber 
plants  are  dipped  in  the  above  mixture  some  injury  will  result  to  the 
terminal  growing  point,  but  if  the  plants  are  sprayed  this  injury  does  not 
occur. 

During  the  spring  and  summer  months  of  1916  this  spray  was  thoroughly 
tried  out  on  a  commercial  scale,  and  proved  to  be  very  satisfactory,  but 
its  expensiveness  precludes  its  free  use  as  a  general  spray  for  red  spiders. 

(b)  Experiments  on  the  Duplication  of  Lemon  Oil.  —  With  the  co- 
operation of  Dr.  E.  B.  Holland  of  the  Massachusetts  Agricultural  Experi- 
ment Station  a  number  of  spray  materials  were  made  in  order  to  deter- 
mine the  killing  agent  in  lemon  oil,  and  for  the  purpose  of  duplicating 
the  efficiency  of  this  oil  by  a  substitute  which  would  be  less  expensive. 
The  following  table  will  briefly  show  the  composition  of  these  mixtures 
and  their  relative  effectiveness  in  controlling  red  spiders:  — 


GREENHOUSE   RED    SPIDER. 


167 


o 

o 

O 

o 

n 

o 

o 

o 

O 

o 

00 

' 

' 

' 

CO 

M 

o 

>o 

o 

^^ 

o 

o 

^ 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

i 

1 

1 

ci 

cs 

1 

1 

1 

o 

"5 

o 

~ 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

lO 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

00 

( 

1 

1 

1 

to 

c^ 

1 

1 

1 

o 

lO 

1 

o 

QO 

1       " 

to 

o 
o 

•* 

^ 

t-" 

1 

1 

"" 

1 

1 

1 

«5 

1 

1 

a> 

1 

o 

o 

o 

o 

u> 

•« 

o 

o 

"O 

«s 

•* 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

•o 

1 

2 

a 

a 

IfO 

o 

o 

"5 

0 

o 

■o 

<M 

W5 

H 

u> 

1 

1 

t 

1 

I 

1 

1 

1 

X 

»-< 

■* 

IH 

M 

f— t 

■B 

o 

o 

o 

o 

O 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

"^ 

«i 

CO 

«i 

00 

" 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

lo 

o 

o 

■c 

o 

o 

m 

1 

(m' 

1 

1 

oj 

(m' 

1 

eo 

1 

ui 

1 

t6 

•^ 

•« 

o 

in 

o 

o 

•a 

lO 

c« 

1 

1 

1 

'^ 

^^ 

1 

1 

" 

1 

1 

a> 

'" 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

1 

1 

o 

1 

1 

•<»< 

t 

1 

•o 

i 

CO 

" 

C 

io 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

g  _ 

1 

1 

o 

1 

1 

1 

Its 

1 

1 

1 

o 

lO 

o 

CD 

lo 

ffO 

>o 

1 

►^ 

00 

^ 

^ 

C 

» 

o 

;h 

3 

1) 

'^ 

a 

o 

Uh 

CJ 

a 
o 

o 

3 

03 

i 

-0 

c 
8 

s 
3 
a 

1 

c 
3 

Q. 

03 

•1 

c 
a 

2 
>> 

JS 

o 
a 

o 

0) 
c3 
13 
O 

s 

© 

3 
'o 

i 

C 

3 

0) 

o 

3 

.s 

3 
'S 

> 

4j' 

s 
8 

« 

3 
0. 

O 

O. 

3 

J 

Q, 

uo 

is 
o 
c 

c 

tH 

CO 

t  «■ 

i 

o 

m 

B 
§3 

a 

1 

"3 
2     O 

c 
o 

s 

1-4 

B 

a 

1  i 
i  1 

M 

o 

o 

^ 

Q    w 

168       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    179. 

(c)  Linseed  Oil  Emulsion.  —  Thus,  out  of  nine  mixtures,  only  those- 
containing  linseed  oil  proved  at  all  promising.  Mixtures  7  and  8  were 
rather  poorly  saponified  (chemically),  while  9a  and  96  were  completely 
saponified;  but  7  and  8  proved  efficient,  while  9a  and  96  were  not.  This 
could  only  be  explained  by  the  fact  that  the  free  linseed  oil  was  really 
the  toxic  agent,  and  when  it  was  only  partly  saponified  there  remained 
some  free  linseed  oil  which  established  the  efficiency  of  the  spray.  Upon 
this  supposition  were  based  other  preparations  containing  linseed  oil 
mechanically  emulsified  in  a  solution  of  soap  in  water.  These  emulsions 
proved  to  be  efficient  when  a  1  per  cent,  oil  spraj^  was  used. 

Two  types  of  linseed  oil  emulsion  may  be  made,  depending  upon  the 
length  of  time  these  emulsions  are  to  be  retained  before  use. 

Experimentally  it  was  found  that  the  most  stable  stock  emulsion  could 
be  made  as  follows :  one-eighth  of  a  pound  of  Ivory  soap  (one-half  a  5-cent 
cake)  dissolved  in  a  pint  of  very  hot  water.  After  the  soap  is  completely 
in  solution  add  1  pint  of  cold  water  followed  by  the  addition  of  1  pint  of 
raw  linseed  oil.  The  oil  should  be  completely  emulsified  by  the  use  of  a 
bucket  pump.  This  solution  is  stable,  pro\dded  the  water  contained  in 
it  is  not  allowed  to  evaporate.  In  using  this  stock  emulsion,  especially 
after  it  has  been  kept  for  some  time,  it  is  best  to  mix  one  part  of  stock 
with  an  equal  volume  of  water  before  diluting  to  desired  strength.  One 
part  of  stock  emulsion  in  20  parts  of  water  proved  to  be  efficient  in  killing 
mites,  both  in  the  quiescent  and  feeding  stages. 

If  spraying  is  to  be  done  soon  after  mixing  thd  emulsion  it  is  best  to 
increase  the  amount  of  water  and  soap,  and  make  the  emulsion  as  follows: 
shave  6  ounces  of  Ivory  soap  (1|  5-cent  bars)  into  1  gallon  of  hot  water. 
Add  2  quarts  of  cold  water  to  cool  the  solution,  then  add  1  quart  of  raw 
linseed  oil  and  emulsify  with  a  bucket  pump.  This  emulsion,  used  at  the 
rate  of  1  part  in  9  parts  of  water,  is  very  efficient,  kilhng  quiescent  and 
feeding  mites  without  injury  to  leaf  tissue. 

Soy  bean  oil  substituted  for  linseed  oil  proves  to  be  efficient,  and  in 
some  localities  could  be  used  to  advantage. 

Action  of  Linseed  Oil  Einulsion  upon  Mites.  —  The  majority  of  oils  used 
as  insecticides  are  regarded  as  contact  poisons.  These  poisonous  oils 
are  supposed  to  enter  the  body  of  the  insect,  either  directly  through  the 
thin  membraneous  chitin  of  the  body  segments  or  by  entering  the  spiracles, 
where  they  immediately  pass  through  the  tracheal  lining  and  produce 
an  active  effect  upon  the  internal  structures  essential  to  the  life  of  the 
insect. 

In  a  previous  part  of  this  paper  it  has  been  showii  that  the  spiracles 
are  very  few,  —  probably  two  in  number,  —  and  that  the  body  of  a  red 
spider  is  covered  by  a  rather  thick  and  continuous  coating  of  chitin.  For 
these  reasons  sprays  which  prove  effective  in  killing  aphids  are  of  little 
value  when  applied  to  mite-infested  plants. 

Many  of  the  spray  materials  which  have  given  partial  success  in  con- 
trolling mites  have  a  marked  adhesive  action,  and  from  this  property 


GREENHOUSE    RED    SPIDER.  169 

linseed  oil  emulsion  derives  its  efficiency.  The  spray  as  made  (see  "Re- 
pressive Measures")  contains  the  amount  of  soap  necessary  to  hold  the 
oil  in  suspension  and  give  the  spray  material  excellent  spreading  qualities. 
Raw  linseed  oil  contains  two  types  of  oils,  —  (1)  drying  oil  and  (2)  resinous 
oil.  Upon  this  fact  is  based  its  usefulness  in  paints,  as  well  as  its  efficiency 
as  a  red  spider  spray. 

A  leaf  thoroughly  covered  by  the  spray  soon  becomes  dry,  the  water 
evaporating,  while  the  oil  and  soap  become  more  and  more  concentrated 
as  this  evaporation  continues.  Finally  there  is  formed  a  very  thin  layer 
of  oil  and  soap  which  gradually  settles  down  on  to  the  leaf  surface,  cover- 
ing all  mites  which  were  feeding  on  the  leaf  at  the  time  of  application. 
This  film  gradually  envelops  the  mite,  and  the  volatile  parts  of  the  linseed 
oil  are  given  off,  leaving  behind  a  resinous  or  waxy  oil  which  securely 
cements  the  legs  of  the  mite  to  itself  and  to  the  leaf.  Thus  the  mite  is 
helpless,  and  the  waxy  residue  of  the  linseed  oil  remains,  sticking  the  mite 
until  it  dies  of  starvation.  Without  doubt  some  of  its  effectiveness  may 
be  due  to  its  being  a  contact  poison,  but  its  most  important  quality  is  its 
adhesiveness. 

Summary  of  Materials  found  to  be  Efficient  Experimentally. 

No  fumigant  was  efficient  in  killing  red  spiders  without  severely  damag- 
ing cucumber  plants. 

Sulfur  burned  to  form  sulfur  dioxid  proved  to  be  very  effective  in 
killing  all  stages  of  mites.  Although  this  gas  is  deadly  to  plant  life,  its 
appUcation  as  a  fumigant  to  rid  empty  houses  of  all  mites  is  extremely 
useful. 

Many  spray  mixtures  proved  to  be  efficient  in  controlling  actively 
feeding  mites,  but  did  not  affect  those  in  the  quiescent  stages  of  develop- 
ment. For  the  control  of  all  stages  above  the  egg  stage  lemon  oil,  a  com- 
mercial product,  and  linseed  oil  emulsion  proved  to  be  the  most  satis- 
factory. Soapy  solutions  should  also  receive  some  attention  as  among 
the  most  readily  prepared  spray  materials,  although  their  efficiency  is 
only  temporary  and  treatment  must  be  repeated  often  in  order  to  control 
these  mites. 

EXPERIMENTS    CONDUCTED    IN   COMMERCIAL   GREEN- 
HOUSES. 

The  materials  found  to  be  most  efficient  in  the  laboratory  experiments 
were  applied  to  cucumber  plants  in  commercial  establishments  in  order 
to  determine  the  practicability  of  spraying  for  the  control  of  these  mites 
before  any  recommendations  were  made. 

It  was  found  impossible  for  the  writer  to  be  stationed  at  these  green- 
houses during  the  whole  spraying  period.  Therefore  the  efficiency  of 
these  sprays  under  commercial  conditions  has  been  determined  largely 
by  the  statements  of  the  growers,  checked  by  more  or  less  frequent  per- 
sonal observations. 


170       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    179. 


Lemon  Oil, 

The  fii-st  of  these  commercial  experiments  commenced  during  May, 
1916,  and  continued  until  the  middle  of  June.  Lemon  oil,  1  part  in  20 
parts  of  water,  was  thoroughly  tested  in  sev^eral  greenhouse^,  and  in  all 
cases  the  spray  proved  very  efficient,  provided  it  was  thoroughly  applied 
to  the  infested  plants.  At  the  time  the  first  commercial  applications 
were  made  the  plants  were  nearly  full-grown,  and  the  mites  were  at  that 
time  rapidly  spreading  through  the  houses.  All  that  could  be  expected 
of  this  spray  was  to  hold  the  red  spiders  in  check,  so  that  they  would  not 
materially  damage  the  whole  house  before  a  good  crop  of  cucumbers  had 
been  picked.  Owing  to  the  scarcity  of  labor  it  was  found  impossible  to 
apply  sprays  at  weekly  intervals,  and  therefore  the  results  were  not  as 
satisfactory  as  they  would  have  been  under  other  conditions.  However, 
these  sprayings  held  the  red  spiders  in  check  and  prolonged  the  life  of 
the  cucumber  plants,  which  would  have  died  early  in  the  season  had  no 
treatment  been  applied. 

In  several  instances  young  potted  cucumber  plants  were  dipped  in  a 
1  to  20  dilution  of  lemon  oil  as  they  were  being  set  in  the  greenhouse. 
This  prov^ed  to  be  injurious  to  the  succulent  leader,  although  the  leaves 
gave  no  indication  of  injury. 

Linseed  Oil  Emulsion. 

During  the  summer  of  1916  experimental  work  on  the  determination 
of  the  killing  property  of  lemon  oil  led  to  the  discovery  of  linseed  oil 
emulsion  and  its  efficiency  in  controlling  mites.  This  emulsion  has  re- 
ceived a  verj'"  thorough  trial  in  commercial  greenhouses  this  season  (1917), 
and  proves  to  be  satisfactory  in  many  respects.  The  ingredients  are 
always  at  hand,  the  initial  cost  is  low,  being  one-fourth  that  of  lemon 
oil,  and  the  method  of  preparation  is  simple. 

Experiment  No.  1. 

Early  in  the  spring  of  1917  this  spray  mixture  was  thoroughly  tested 
on  a  commercial  scale  in  greenhouses  located  in  Watertown,  Mass.  This 
range  is  naturally  divided  into  two  groups.  Group  I.  contained  the  oldest 
cucumber  plants  and  Group  IL  the  youngest.  It  was  decided  that  appli- 
cations should  be  made  to  the  youngest  plants,  although  they  were  really 
too  old  for  effective  spraying.  The  cucumber  plants  became  badly  in- 
fested in  the  seed-plant  house  before  being  set  out.  Therefore  this  in- 
festation became  serious  soon  after  the  plants  were  transplanted  to  the 
greenhouses.  Severe  pruning  was  resorted  to,  but  this  did  not  hold  the 
mites  in  check.  For  efficient  control,  these  plants  should  have  been 
thoroughly  sprayed  at  the  time  they  were  transplanted. 

Group  II.  consisted  of  three  greenhouses.  In  greenhouse  No.  1  the 
plants  were  very  heavily  infested,  and  were  5  feet  tall  at  the  time  of  the 


GREENHOUSE    RED    SPIDER.  171 

fii-st  application.  In  No.  2  the  plants  were  2|  feet  tall  and  generally 
infested,  although  not  sho\\ing  any  noticeable  injury  to  the  plants  from 
the  red  spider  attack.  In  No.  3  the  plants  were  4  feet  high  and  rather 
severely  infested.  In  each  of  these  houses  three  applications  were  made 
at  weekly  intervals. 

The  final  results  of  these  experiments  are  as  follows:  the  greenhouses 
of  Group  I.  were  not  sprayed,  and  though  the  plants  were  very  little 
older  than  those  in  Group  II.  they  died  from  the  red  spider  injury  after 
being  in  the  range  approximately  three  months.  In  Group  II.  the  plants 
were  sprayed  and  produced  fruit  for  over  a  month  longer  than  the  un- 
sprayed  plants  of  Group  I,  Houses  No.  1  and  No.  3  contained  such  large 
cucumber  plants  that  a  thorough  application  of  a  spray  was  found  im- 
possible, but  the  ravages  of  these  mites  were  checked  during  the  spraying 
period.  Although  a  complete  control  was  impossible,  the  productive  life 
of  the  crop  was  lengthened  approximately  one  month.  In  house  No.  2, 
containing  the  youngest  cucumber  plants  in  Group  II.,  the  control  was 
much  more  efficient,  primarily  because  the  plants  were  smaller  and  a 
thorough  spraying  could  be  given  them.  However,  even  these  plants 
were  too  large  to  insure  a  thorough  application  after  the  first  spraying. 

Experiment  No.  2. 

Further  tests  of  the  efficiency  of  linseed  oil  emulsion  were  made  in 
commercial  greenhouses  at  Arlington,  Mass.  In  this  establishment  all 
plants  were  infested  in  the  seed-plant  house  while  still  in  pots.  Soon  after 
they  were  set  in  the  greenhouses  the  first  spray  was  applied,  and  one  week 
later  the  second  application  was  made.  These  two  applications  were 
made  at  the  proper  time,  and  controlled  the  mites  so  effectually  that 
during  midsummer  some  of  these  houses  were  yielding  good  crops,  while 
only  a  few  scattered  plants  were  beginning  to  show  marked  red  spider 
injury.  At  approximately  the  same  time  in  former  years  the  plants  in 
these  houses  have  been  severely  infested  and  dying  from  the  ravages  of 
the  red  spider.  This  range  of  greenhouses  consists  of  twelve  large  houses, 
and  therefore  it  is  not  surprising  that  the  whole  establishment  could  not 
be  thoroughly  covered  each  week. 

An  excellent  demonstration  of  the  efficiency  of  linseed  oil  emulsion  was 
made  in  the  seed-plant  house.  As  stated  above,  when  the  cucumber 
plants  were  still  in  pots  in  this  house  they  were  noticeably  infested  by 
red  spiders.  The  grower,  knowing  that  this  house  contained  many  mites, 
determined  that  sprayings  should  be  given  with  special  care,  in  order  to 
eradicate  these  pests.  Soon  after  the  potted  plants  were  set  out  in  the 
seed-plant  house  the  first  application  was  given,  care  being  taken  to 
cover  thoroughly  all  the  leaf  surface.  One  week  after  this  the  second 
thorough  spraying  was  applied.  These  applications  were  made  so  thor- 
oughly that  very  few  if  any  mites  which  originally  infested  the  cucumber 
plants  survived,  and  the  plants  attained  full  growth  without  showing 
any  red  spider  injury. 


172       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    179. 


Conclusions  drawn  from  Commercial  Spraying  Experiments. 

Sprayings  conducted  on  bright,  sunny  days  with  a  rather  high  tem- 
perature in  the  greenhouse  resulted  in  slight  injury  to  the  edges  of  the 
leaves,  but  if  applications  were  made  on  cool,  cloudy  days  this  injury 
did  not  occur. 

For  a  thoroughly  efficient  control  at  least  three  applications  should  be 
given  the  cucumber  plants  at  weekly  intervals,  as  soon  after  they  have 
been  set  out  in  the  greenhouses  as  possible. 

PREVENTION. 

The  wTiter  has  been  unable  to  conduct  a  thorough  test  in  eliminating 
red  spiders  from  the  whole  range  by  cultural  methods,  because  it  was 
found  impossible  to  procure  an  establishment  which  would  serve  for  this 
purpose.  In  commercial  greenhouses  many  factors  enter  into  the  red 
spider  problem  which  cannot  be  solved  unless  a  suitable  range  is  found 
which  will  eliminate  these  confusing  factors  in  order  that  some  definite 
knowledge  may  be  gained  by  using  preventive  measures.  However, 
under  greenhouse  conditions,  it  is  the  writer's  firm  conviction  that  the 
red  spiders  can  be  totally  exterminated  from  commercial  ranges  by  clean 
culture,  both  within  and  outside  the  greenhouse.  It  is  hoped  that  some 
experimental  work  may  be  conducted  on  this  important  control  measure 
in  the  near  future.  , 

CONTROL  MEASURES. 

The  general  biology  and  development  of  experimental  and  commercial 
control  measures  have  already  been  discussed,  but  only  in  a  general  way. 
Under  this  heading  the  methods  used  for  the  prevention  and  repression 
of  red  spiders  will  be  taken  up  more  in  detail.  Having  established  the 
efficiency  of  the  repressive  measures,  only  the  preparation  and  application 
of  spray  materials  will  be  considered. 

Preventive  Measures. 

The  solution  of  the  red  spider  control  problem  in  cucumber  greenhouses 
should  be  accomplished  through  preventive  efforts  rather  than  by  re- 
pression, if  it  is  to  be  done  most  economically.  The  commercial  grower 
should  do  everything  possible  to  eliminate  these  pests,  both  within  and 
outside  his  greenhouses. 

In  the  majority  of  cases  cucumber  plants  are  infested  either  in  the 
plant  house  or  soon  after  they  have  been  set  out  in  the  greenhouse.  The 
origin  of  this  infestation  may  be  weeds  which  have  harbored  mites  through- 
out the  winter  inside  the  greenhouse,  or  weeds  and  grasses  immediately 
surrounding  the  house  at  the  base  of  which  the  mites  winter  over  and 
migrate  into  the  greenhouse  early  in  the  spring.    The  first  is  very  im- 


GREENHOUSE   RED    SPIDER.  173 

portant  when  plants  are  started  very  early  in  the  season,  while  the  second 
is  of  importance  only  after  the  warm  days  of  spring  have  started  these 
outside  weeds. 

Fumigation  of  Greenhouses  and  Equipynent  with  Sulfur  Fumes. 

Immediate!}^  before  setting  the  cucumber  plants  in  a  house,  and  before 
fumigation  is  begun,  all  boards  which  are  to  be  used  either  between  the 
cucumber  rows  or  to  make  "A"  trellises  should  be  taken  inside  the  green- 
house. Do  not  lay  the  boards  on  the  ground,  but  stand  them  against  the 
steam  pipes  or  in  some  similar  manner  to  allow  the  poisonous  gas  free 
access  to  all  parts.  Other  equipment  which  has  been  in  any  way  con- 
nected with  a  previous  infestation  and  is  to  be  used  during  the  cucumber 
season  should  also  be  placed  in  the  house  for  fumigation.  Do  not  intro- 
duce living  plants  until  after  a  thorough  fumigation  and  a  subsequent 
airing  of  the  houses,  as  sulfur  fumes  are  deadly  to  plant  life. 

In  fumigating,  each  house  should  be  tightly  closed  and  sulfur  used  at 
the  rate  of  one-third  of  a  pound  to  every  1,000  cubic  feet  of  space.  (In- 
crease to  one-half  pound  in  case  of  houses  that  are  not  fairly  tight.) 

Directions  for  Fumigation.  —  "Weigh  the  required  amount  of  sulfur  and 
di\ade  it  into  four  equal  parts  upon  pieces  of  paper.  This  is  about  the 
right  number  for  a  150-foot  house.  Metal  pans  with  plenty  of  breadth 
are  perhaps  the  best  containers  for  the  fumigating  operation.  First 
cover  the  bottom  of  each  pan  with  chips  that  have  been  soaked  in  kerosene, 
and  distribute  these  containers  at  various  points  through  the  house, 
placing  beside  each  the  sulfur  to  be  used.  When  all  is  in  readiness  set 
fire  to  the  chips,  and  when  these  are  burning  well  drop  in  the  sulfur.  Be 
certain  that  the  sulfur  has  ignited  and  then  withdraw  from  the  house. 
Allow  the  sulfur  fumes  to  act  for  at  least  twelve  hours  before  opening  the 
house.  This  fumigation  may  be  done  during  the  day  or  at  night,  accord- 
ing to  the  convenience  of  the  grower,  and  if  the  method  is  followed  out 
careful!)^  the  red  spiders  wall  be  completely  exterminated  within  the 
house. 

Special  attention  should  be  paid  to  the  house  in  which  potted  cucumbers 
are  to  be  grown,  and  fumigation  should  be  very  thorough,  for  in  many 
cases  the  seat  of  infestation  occurs  here.  At  the  conclusion  of  the  cu- 
cumber crop  in  the  late  summer  the  whole  house  should  be  fumigated  with 
sulfur  before  the  plants  have  died,  thus  preventing  the  borders  from 
becoming  infested  from  throw^n-out  cucumber  plants,  and  reducing  the 
number  of  red  spiders  which  would  otherwise  winter  over  and  attack  the 
next  cucumber  crop. 

Destroying  Outside  Sources  of  Infestation. 
The  next  problem  which  confronts  the  grower  is  to  eliminate  the  possi- 
bility of  infesting  the  houses  from  outside  sources.     Investigation  has 
shown  that  many  weeds  and  grasses,  often  found  around  greenhouses, 
serve  as  breeding  places  for  these  pests,  and  undoubtedly  are  the  source 


174       MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    179. 

of  inside  infestation.  In  the  fall  red  spiders  are  found  in  large  numbers 
on  these  grassy  borders,  and  being  capable  of  wintering  over  out  of  doors, 
it  follows  that  a  large  percentage  of  those  found  in  the  fall  will  also  be 
present  in  the  spring,  and  are  quite  certain  to  migrate  to  the  more  at- 
tractive cucumber  plants  within  the  greenhouse. 

Methods  of  Exterminating  Grassy  Borders. 

1.  The  border  for  at  least  10  feet  away  from  the  house  should  be  thor- 
oughly cultivated,  preventing  the  gro^^i.h  of  weeds  throughout  the  season. 

2.  Where  cultivation  is  not  practicable,  burning  the  border  may  be 
resorted  to. 

3.  If  neither  of  the  above  methods  can  be  employed,  kill  all  vegetation 
around  the  greenhouse  by  spraying  mth  sodium  arsenite  used  at  the  rate 
of  1  pound  to  20  gallons  of  water.  It  must  be  remembered,  however, 
that  sodium  arsenite  is  a  poison,  and  care  should  be  taken  to  prevent 
animals  from  grazing  on  treated  borders.    Eepeat  as  often  as  necessary. 

Elimination  of  Artificial  Dispersion. 

As  described  under  "Feeding  Habits  and  Dispersion,"  the  most  im- 
portant factors  in  artificial  dispersion  are  the  men  working  in  the  green- 
houses. The  grower  should  systematize,  as  far  as  it  is  practicable,  all 
work  which  must  be  done  in  his  houses  according  to  the  infestation;  for 
example,  in  two  greenhouses,  one  showing  red  spider  injury,  the  other 
apparently  free,  pruning  or  "rolling  up"  of  plants  should  first  be  done 
in  the  house  apparently  free  from  infestation,  and  later  in  the  infested 
house.  Also  in  picking  cucumbers,  the  young  houses  —  which  usually 
are  not  as  badly  infested  as  older  ones- — should  be  picked  first,  and 
older,  badly  infested  houses  last.  Special  care  should  be  exercised  not 
to  allow  the  men  who  have  finished  picking  in  a  badly  infested  house  to 
start  pruning  or  "rolling  up "  a  very  young  house.  Baskets  used  in  picking 
cucumbers  should  never  be  used  in  a  younger  house  as  a  receptacle  for 
pruned  parts  of  young  plants. 

The  wi'iter  realizes  that  these  recommendations  are  not  all  applicable 
under  commercial  conditions,  but  every  precaution  which  is  practicable 
should  be  taken  if  artificial  dispersion  and  infestation  are  to  be  reduced. 

Repressive  Measures. 

During  the  early  stages  of  infestation  it  is  frequently  found  advisable 
to  destroy  plants  which  are  found  to  be  badly  infested.  These  badly 
infested  plants  should  be  pulled  out  before  the  leaves  begin  to  die,  so  as 
to  prevent  dispersion  due  to  lack  of  food. 

If  a  few  leaves,  usually  near  the  ground,  are  badly  infested  the  pruning 
of  these  will  lessen  the  numbers  of  mites  materially.  In  all  cases,  whether 
a  plant  has  been  pulled  or  pruned,  the  red  spiders  on  these  leaves  should 
be  destroyed  by  burning.    Do  not  throw  them  outside  of  the  house,  but 


GREENHOUSE   RED    SPIDER.  175 

destroy  them  immediately,  thus  elimmating  the  chance  of  infesting  plants 
surrounding  the  greenhouse.  Pruning  is  especially  useful  when  judi- 
ciously applied  to  the  young  plants  in  a  greenhouse.  Such  pruning  should 
be  supplemented  by  spraying  for  a  thoroughly  efficient  control. 

Spraying. 

If  there  is  any  possibility  of  infestation,  spraying  should  commence 
soon  after  the  cucumber  plants  have  been  set  out  in  the  greenhouse.  If 
sprajdng  is  done  at  this  time  less  material  will  be  used,  and  a  very  thorough 
application  can  be  given  in  a  minimum  amount  of  time.  In  experiments 
conducted  in  commercial  greenhouses  it  Vv^as  found  that  red  spider  sprays 
applied  to  young  cucumber  plants  gave  very  satisfactory  results,  while 
on  older  plants  these  sprays  did  not  prove  as  efficient.  This  can  be  ex- 
plained by  the  fact  that  a  good-sized  cucumber  plant  has  a  large  amount 
of  leaf  surface  which  must  be  thoroughly  covered  by  the  contact  spray 
if  efficiency  is  to  be  expected.  This  is  economically  impossible  after  the 
plants  have  become  nearly  full-grown,  because  of  the  length  of  time  and 
amount  of  material  necessary  to  accomplish  it.  Early  sprajdng  will  con- 
trol red  spiders  at  a  minimum  expense  of  time,  labor  and  materials. 

Linseed  oil  emulsion  is  especially  adapted  for  use  in  commercial  green- 
houses on  a  rather  large  scale. 

If  only  a  few  plants  need  to  be  treated,  lemon  oil,  manufactured  by 
the  Lemon  Oil  Company,  Baltimore,  Md.,  may  be  purchased  at  nearly 
all  stores  carrying  insecticides.  This,  diluted  at  the  rate  of  1  part  in  20 
parts  of  water,  gives  a  very  eflacient  spray,  but  for  commercial  spraying 
this  material  is  too  expensive. 

Soapy  solutions  sprayed  upon  delicate  plants  on  several  successive 
days  prove  to  be  useful.  In  making  this  solution  a  high-grade  soap 
(Ivory  soap)  should  be  dissolved  at  the  rate  of  4  ounces  in  3  or  4  gallons 
of  water. 

Preparation  of  Linseed  Oil  Emulsion. 

(a)  The  necessary  articles  for  preparation  are  as  follows :  — 
L  Bucket  pump. 

2.  Container  or  mixing  tank.  This  should  hold  at  least  8  or  9  gallons. 
For  this  purpose  a  small  washtub  is  perhaps  the  most  available.  Pails 
may  be  used,  provided  the  materials  are  mixed  proportionally. 

3.  Ivory  soap. 

4.  Raw  linseed  oil. 

5.  Hot  water. 

(6)  The  following  proportions  of  materials  for  100  gallons  of  spray  are 
used : — 

1.  Five  gallons  of  hot  water. 

2.  One  and  one-half  pounds  of  Ivory  soap.  (Six  5-cent  cakes  or  three 
10-cent  cakes.) 

3.  One  gallon  of  raw  Unseed  oil. 


176       MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    179. 

(c)  Steps  in  the  preparation  of  stock  solution  follow:  — • 

1.  Put  the  required  amount  of  hot  water  in  the  container. 

2.  Shave  the  Ivory  soap  into  this  and  stir  until  completely  dissolved. 

3.  If  at  this  time  the  temperature  of  the  soap  solution  is  too  hot  for 
the  hand  to  bear,  dilute  with  1  gallon  of  cold  water  and  let  it  stand  until 
about  body  temperature  or  lukev/arm.  The  cooling  of  this  solution  is 
necessary  in  order  to  prepa-re  a  permanent  emulsion;  otherwise  the  oil 
will  come  to  the  surface  on  standing  ("see  No.  6).  It  also  prevents  the 
chemical  and  physical  Icilling  properties  of  the  linseed  oil  from  being 
changed  by  heat. 

4.  Add  slowly,  while  stirring  vigorously,  1  gallon  of  linseed  oil. 

5.  Completely  emulsify  by  using  the  bucket  pump.  Pump  the  emulsion 
from  the  container  through  the  pump  and  back  into  the  container  again, 
keeping  the  nozzle  below  the  surface  of  liquid.  Five  minutes'  vigorous 
pumping  should  completely  emulsify  this  solution. 

6.  Set  aside  for  a  few  minutes  while  preparing  spray  tank  in  order  to 
see  that  oil  does  not  come  to  the  surface. 

(.d)  The  following  are  directions  for  the  preparation  of  spray  tank  and 
spray :  — 

1.  Fill  the  100-gallon  spray  tank  about  one-half  full  of  water.  If  the 
water  used  is  too  cold,  upon  the  addition  of  the  stock  solution  the  soap 
will  solidify  into  small  lumps,  thus  spoiling  the  emulsion.  This  may  occur 
early  in  the  spring,  when  the  water  is  very  cold,  but  later  in  the  season 
ordinary  tap  water  may  he  used  without  danger  of  the  soap  solidifying 
on  the  addition  of  the  stock  solution. 

2.  Add  stock  solution  made  above.    (See  (c)  1,  2,  3,  4,  5,  6.) 

3.  Agitate.  (If  lumping  occurs,  the  addition  of  a  few  pails  of  hot 
water  will  remedy  this.) 

4.  Fill  the  100-gallon  spray  tank. 

Application  of  the  Spray. 

Outfits  and  Methods  of  Spraying.  — •  In  commercial  greenhouse  spraying 
either  a  barrel  pump  or  power  sprayer  should  be  employed,  the  latter 
being  the  more  economical,  provided  it  is  available  and  the  size  of  the 
establishment  warrants  its  use.  For  spraying  a  few  plants,  or  in  a  very 
small  greenhouse,  perhaps  the  most  satisfactory  outfit  consists  of  a  com- 
pressed air  sprayer. 

The  length  of  hose  necessary  in  spraying  cucumber  houses  depends 
upon  the  size  of  the  house  and  the  method  of  growing  cucumbers.  If 
the  vertical  trellis  system  is  used,  in  most  cases  it  is  best  to  have  the 
hose  of  sufficient  length  to  reach  from  the  sprayer  down  the  middle  aisle 
and  across  the  opposite  end  of  the  house,  thus  eliminating  the  necessity 
of  changing  the  spraj'^er  during  the  spraying  operations.  By  passing  in  a 
zigzag  manner  across  the  house  and  gradually  working  backward  the 
house  may  be  thoroughly  covered  in  the  least  amount  of  time.  If  cucum- 
bers are  grown  on  the  "A  "  trellis  system  the  man  sprajang  should  travel 


GREENHOUSE    RED    SPIDER.  177 

up  on  one  side  of  the  row  and  back  on  the  other.  In  either  case  a  boy 
should  be  employed  to  guide  the  hose,  so  that  it  will  not  injure  the  plants 
as  it  is  pulled  from  one  row  to  the  other. 

These  are  the  most  common  methods  of  spraying,  but  there  are  many 
modifications  which  the  grower  can  make  according  to  the  conditions 
surrounding  his  houses  and  the  manner  of  growing  his  plants. 

An  extension  rod  made  from  small  piping  with  an  elbowed  tip  or  angle 
nozzle  is  absolutely  necessary  for  thoroughness  in  spraying.  If  cucumber 
plants  are  grown  on  the  vertical  trellis  system  the  extension  rod  should 
be  about  2|  feet  in  length,  while  if  grown  on  the  "A"  trellis  system  the 
rod  should  be  4  feet  in  length,  as  this  will  allow  the  man  spraying  to  reach 
the  basal  leaves  of  the  plants  readily.  It  is  perhaps  more  satisfactory 
to  use  a  45°  angle  nozzle,  several  of  which  may  be  purchased  {e.g.,  Friend 
and  Simplex  angle  nozzles^,  thus  eliminating  the  necessity  of  a  separate 
elbow. 

Methods  of  Application.  —  From  the  fact  that  the  red  spider  as  a  rule 
passes  its  entire  existence  upon  the  under  surface  of  a  single  leaf,  early  in 
the  season,  when  the  plant  is  only  slightly  infested,  it  is  plainly  necessary 
in  spraying  to  cover  the  entire  under  side  of  every  leaf.  Special  attention 
should  be  paid  leaves  showing  typical  red  spider  injury,  especially  the 
lower  leaves  of  the  plant,  near  the  ground,  as  these  are  usually  most 
severely  infested.  To  facilitate  this  under-surface  spray  an  extension 
rod  with  an  elbow  tip  or  angle  nozzle  is  essential. 

The  pressure  necessary  in  power  spraying  varies  from  50  to  125  pounds, 
depending  upon  the  type  of  nozzle.  Do  not  allow  the  spray  to  bombard 
the  under  surface  of  the  leaf  if  a  coarse  nozzle  is  used.  As  this  Unseed 
oil  emulsion  is  a  contact  spray,  it  is  necessary  that  the  whole  under  surface 
of  a  leaf  should  be  covered  by  a  film  of  this  material.  If  the  spray  is 
deposited  on  the  leaf  in  fine  droplets  which  do  not  run  together,  this  can 
be  remedied  by  the  adjustment  of  the  pressure  until  they  unite  to  form 
a  film.  If  a  coarse  nozzle  is  used,  as  the  Simplex,  a  low  pressure  will  be 
required  for  film  formation,  while  with  a  fine  nozzle,  as  the  Friend,  a 
higher  pressure  will  be  necessary.  A  preference  should  be  given  the 
fine  nozzle  and  high  pressure,  as  this  is  less  apt  to  injure  the  leaves,  while 
it  proves  very  satisfactory  in  forming  the  film.  The  success  6r  failure  of 
the  spraying  depends  upon  this  film  formation  and  thorough  appUcation 
of  the  material. 

When  Applications  should  he  made.  —  In  general  greenhouse  practice 
spraying  on  bright  days  is  and  should  be  the  rule,  as  with  sunshine  there 
is  less  danger  that  conditions  favorable  for  disease  will  result.  In  the 
application  of  the  linseed  oil  emulsion,  however,  spraying  conducted  on 
sunny  days  with  a  rather  high  temperature  in  the  greenhouse  may  result 
in  a  slight  injury  to  the  edges  of  the  leaf,  while  if  spraying  is  done  on 
cool,  cloudy  daj'-s  no  injury  is  caused  by  the  apphcations.  Therefore,  as 
far  as  possible,  spraying  for  the  red  spider  should  be  done  on  cloudy  days 
when  the  temperature  in  the  house  is  not  over  80°.    The  injury  on  bright 


178       MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    179. 

days  has  never  been  serious,  but  should  be  eUminated  as  far  as  possible 
by  proper  management  of  greenhouse  temperature  and  the  selection  of 
suitable  days  for  spraying. 

In  order  to  effectively  control  red  spider  infestations,  at  least  three 
sprayings  given  at  weekly  intervals  are  necessary. 

The  first  spraying  should  usually  be  applied  one  week  after  the  plants 
have  been  set  in  the  greenhouse.  If  the  young  plants  show  mite  injury 
before  this  time  the  application  should  be  made  as  soon  as  possible. 
Usually  young  cucumber  plants  do  not  appear  to  be  affected  early  in  the 
season.  However,  on  closer  examination  it  will  be  found  that  the  majority 
of  these  plants  harbor  a  few  mites  which,  if  allowed  to  develop  unhin- 
dered, will  later  become  so  numerous,  and  the  plant  so  large  by  the  time 
injury  is  noticeable,  that  an  efficient  control  will  be  found  extremely 
difficult  and  expensive. 

Since  this  spray  does  not  destroy  red  spider  eggs  it  is  clear  that  a  second 
application  is  necessary  to  kill  the  individuals  which  were  eggs  at  the 
time  of  the  first  spraying.  This  should  be  applied  seven  to  eight  days 
after  the  first.  If  the  second  spray  is  not  applied  at  the  proper  time  it 
will  be  almost  impossible  to  control  these  pests,  for  many  mites  will 
have  become  adult  and  laid  eggs  unless  the  application  is  made  as  rec- 
ommended. 

Some  mites  are  sure  to  escape  the  first  and  second  sprayings,  and  there- 
fore a  third  application  must  be  given  in  order  to  kill  these  mites,  which 
if  not  controlled  will  rapidly  multiply  and  severely  injure  the  plants. 

As  previously  mentioned  in  the  discussion  of  the  "Economic  Im- 
portance of  the  Pest,"  the  loss  to  cucumber  growers  due  to  red  spider 
infestation  consists  in  shortening  the  life  of  the  plant  during  its  pro- 
ductive period.  It  is  absolutely  essential  that  these  three  sprayings  be 
made  as  directed,  otherwise  the  producing  period  of  the  plants  will  be 
reduced  at  least  one  month. 

Under  normal  conditions  the  few  mites  found  early  in  the  season  re- 
produce rapidly  until  finally  the  plant  becomes  seriously  affected  by 
the  injuries  caused  by  their  progeny,  and  usually  dies  before  producing 
a  full  crop.  If  the  mites  are  held  in  check  by  weekly  applications  early 
in  the  season  the  length  of  the  period  during  which  these  regular  applica- 
tions are  made  will  later  be  added  to  the  adult  life  of  the  plant.  The 
longer  the  spraying  period  the  longer  the  productive  life  of  the  cucumber 
plant. 

It  is  therefore  of  great  financial  importance  to  the  grower  to  see  that 
these  sprayings  are  thoroughly  applied  at  weekly  intervals  during  the 
early  life  of  the  crop. 

Cost  of  Spraying.  —  The  comparative  cost  of  100  gallons  of  spray 
containing  lemon  oil  and  linseed  oil  is  as  follows:  lemon  oil,  $8.75; 
linseed  oil  emulsion,  $1.50. 

If  sprayings  are  made  with  a  power  sprayer  it  will  take  a  man,  with  the 
help  of  a  boy,  approximately  three  hours  to  spray  thoroughly  a  green- 


GREENHOUSE    RED    SPIDER.  179 

house  containing  1,600  cucumber  plants  about  4  feet  high.  The  material 
used  ■ndll  amount  to  100  gallons.  Thus  the  cost  of  one  spraying  when 
the  plants  are  nearly  half  grown  is  approximatel}^  $3. 

Spray  materials,  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .     $1  50 

Man,  three  hours,  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .        1  00 

Boj',  three  hours,  ..........  50 


$3  00 


This  is  a  fair  estimate  of  the  cost  of  the  'third  sprajdng.  The  first  and 
second  sprajdngs  taken  together  should  cost  approximately  $3.  Thus, 
for  three  applications  of  linseed  oil  emulsion  to  1,600  plants,  the  invest- 
ment for  labor  and  materials  will  be  approximately  $6.  This  should  be 
considered  insurance  on  the  crop.  At  the  above  rate  the  cost  for  three 
applications  is  less  than  one-half  cent  per  plant. 

The  original  investment  for  spray  materials  and  labor  will  be  repaid 
many  times  over  by  prolonging  the  fruit-bearing  period  of  the  plants. 

CONTROL  OF  RED  SPIDERS  ATTACKING  OTHER  CROPS. 

Perhaps  a  few  words  relative  to  the  control  of  these  mites  attacking 
some  of  the  other  crops  will  prove  useful,  especially  to  florists.  Although 
the  writer  has  confined  most  of  his  attention  to  the  control  of  this  pest  on 
cucumbers,  it  is  reasonable  to  suppose  the  same  control  measures  will 
give  as  satisfactory  results  in  eliminating  this  pest  on  other  plants.  While 
this  is  true,  a  few  factors  must  be  thoroughly  understood  in  order  to 
procure  these  results. 

On  small  or  rather  smooth-leaved  plants,  such  as  the  violet,  rose, 
carnation,  sweet  pea  and  bean,  the  linseed  oil  emulsion  spray  as  used  on 
cucumbers  does  not  prove  as  satisfactory.  The  reason  for  this  is  that  the 
greater  part  of  the  spray  applied  to  these  plants  runs  off  the  leaf,  and  not 
enough  linseed  oil  is  deposited  on  the  mites  to  render  them  helpless.  To 
remedy  this  difficulty  the  stock  linseed  oil  emulsion  should  not  be  diluted 
as  much  as  recommended  for  cucumber  spraying.  In  some  cases  where 
very  delicate  plants  are  to  be  sprayed  the  same  dilution  may  be  made, 
but  the  solution  of  soap  should  be  stronger. 

In  spraying  cucumbers  a  1  per  cent,  linseed  oil  mixture  is  used.  On 
plants  such  as  the  violet  it  is  best  that  the  original  linseed  oil  stock  solution 
be  diluted  only  one-half  as  much,  making  a  2  per  cent,  linseed  oil  mixture 
and  a  more  concentrated  soap  solution. 

In  the  majority  of  cases  proper  experimentation  by  the  grower  will 
furnish  satisfactory  evidence  for  the  required  dilution  for  eflftciency  on  his 
special  crop. 

During  July  and  August,  1917,  the  WTiter  had  the  opportunity  of  thor- 
oughly testing  the  efficiency  of  this  2  per  cent,  linseed  oil  emulsion  for  the 
control  of  red  spiders  attacking  violets  in  the  field  at  Mr.  William  Sims' 
greenhouses,  Cliftondale,  Mass.    This  field  of  violets,  containing  about 


180       MASS.   EXPERIMENT    STATION   BULLETIN    179. 

100,000  plants,  was  sprayed,  using  a  power  sprayer,  three  times  between 
July  15  and  September  1.  The  object  of  this  spraying  was  not  to  rid  the 
plants  of  red  spiders,  although  this  undoubtedly  could  have  been  accom- 
plished, but  to  keep  their  numbers  so  reduced  during  the  dry  summer 
months  that  they  could  not  seriously  injure  the  new  and  tender  foliage 
or  kill  the  plants  as  they  had  done  in  previous  years. 

The  results  were  entirely  satisfactory,  and  the  violet  plants  were  kept 
practicall}'  free  from  these  pests.  Those  plants  rather  seriously  damaged 
before  spraying  began  regained  their  dark  green  foliage,  and  during  the 
middle  of  August  only  a  few  leaves  could  be  found  in  the  field  showing 
typical  red  spider  injury.  Thus  the  damage  caused  by  red  spiders  was 
reduced  to  a  minimum  by  spraying,  while  in  previous  years  and  under 
similar  conditions  they  had  practically  stripped  the  plants  of  their  foliage. 

The  difficulty  of  thoroughly  applying  a  spray  to  the  lower  surface  of 
the  leaves  of  a  low-growing  plant  is  well  recognized,  for  our  modern 
nozzles  are  not  adapted  to  this  type  of  spraying.  This  difficulty,  however, 
may  be  overcome  in  \dolet  spraying  bj^  the  use  of  a  simple  spray  nozzle 
consisting  of  a  "Skinner  System"  plug.  This  plug  is  often  used  in  green- 
houses, where  it  is  inserted  at  intervals  in  the  side  of  a  water  pipe.  Water 
passes  from  the  pipe  through  a  small  hole  in  the  center  of  the  plug,  and 
then  strikes  a  curved  lip  which  transforms  the  solid  stream  to  a  fine,  fan- 
like spray.  This  plug  is  placed  in  the  end  of  an  extension  rod  5  feet  in 
length,  made  from  one-eighth-inch  piping.  The  rod  is  then  bent  until 
the  fan-like  spray  travels  parallel  to  the  surface  of  the  ground.  This 
type  of  nozzle  proved  very  satisfactory,  and  could  be  held  close  to  the 
plant  without  injuring  the  leaves. 

SUMMARY. 

The  common  greenhouse  red  spider  (Tetranychus  bimaculatus  Harvey) 
is  very  generally  distributed  throughout  the  United  States,  extending 
from  Maine  to  Florida,  and  westward  to  Texas  and  California,  only  a 
few  States  in  the  western  arid  region  being  exempt  from  the  ravages  of 
this  pest. 

The  red  spider  is  very  cosmopolitan  in  its  feeding  habits.  In  market- 
garden  greenhouses  the  most  important  vegetable  attacked  is  the  cu- 
cumber. In  floriculture  greenhouses  the  rose,  violet,  sweet  pea,  carnation 
and  chrysanthemum  are  seriously  injured.  The  most  important  outside 
plants,  as  far  as  the  greenhouse  man  is  concerned,  are  those  found  around 
most  greenhouses,  consisting  of  clover,  grasses  and  weeds,  as  these  are 
undoubtedly  important  factors  in  causing  inside  infestation. 

It  is  estimated  that  the  annual  loss  to  cucumber  men  in  the  Boston 
market-garden  district,  due  to  red  spider  injury,  amounts  approximately 
to  1150,000,  or  10  per  cent,  of  the  whole  crop. 

Experimentation  on  the  control  of  this  mite  attacking  cucumbers  gave 
no  f umigant  which  could  be  used  with  safety  to  the  foliage.  Sulfur  burned 
to  form  sulfur  dioxide  proved  to  be  very  effective  in  killing  all  stages  of 


GREENHOUSE   RED    SPIDER.  181 

mites.  Although  this  gas  is  deadly  to  plant  life,  its  application  as  a 
fumigant  to  rid  empty  greenhouses  of  red  spiders  is  extremely  useful. 

Many  spray  mixtures  proved  to  be  efficient  in  controlling  actively 
feeding  mites,  but  did  not  affect  those  in  quiescent  stages  of  development. 
For  the  control  of  all  stages  above  the  egg  stage  linseed  oil  emulsion  proved 
to  be  the  most  satisfactory. 

The  control  of  the  red  spider  may  be  accomplished  by  combining  pre- 
ventive and  repressive  measures. 

Clean  culture,  or  the  eradication  of  weeds  and  plants  which  harbor 
mites  during  the  winter  period,  either  within  or  outside  the  greenhouse, 
is  by  far  the  most  vital  means  of  prevention  in  cucumber  greenhouses. 

Dispersion  within  the  greenhouse  may  be  hindered  bj^  destroying  plants 
or  parts  of  plants  which  harbor  the  initial  infestation. 

Applications  of  linseed  oil  emulsion  at  weekly  intervals  during  the 
early  life  of  the  plant  prove  very  effective  if  made  with  extreme  care. 
At  least  three  applications  must  be  made  for  an  efficient  control. 

By  checking  red  spider  infestation  early  in  the  season  the  producing 
period  of  the  plants  is  lengthened  approximately  one  month. 

BIBLIOGRAPHY. 

The  following  bibliography  includes  only  the  more  important  economic 
works  on  the  red  spider:  — 

Britton,  W.  E.,  1901.     "Common  Soap  as  an  Insecticide."    First  Rept.  State Ent., 

Conn.,  pp.  227,  278.    (Red  Spider  Remedy,  pp.  271-273.) 
Chittenden,  F.  H.,   1901.     "Some  Insects  Injurious  to  Violet,  Rose,  and  Other 

Ornamental  Plants."    Bull.  27,  n.  s..  Bur.  Ent.,  U.  S.  Dept.  Agri.    (The  Two- 
spotted  Red  Spider  and  Control,  pp.  35-42,  Figs.  9-14.) 
Chittenden,  F.  H.,   1909.     "The  Common  Red  Spider."     Ciro.  104,  Bur.  Ent., 

U.  S.  Dept.  Agri. 
Ewing,  H.  E.,   1914.     "The  Common  Red  Spider  or  Spider  Mite."     Bull.  121, 

Oregon  Agri.  Exp.  Sta.,  95  pp.,  30  figs. 
Fleet,  W.  J.,  1900.     "Some  Comparative  Trials  of  Insecticide  Pumps  in  Relation 

to  the  Treatment  of  Tea  Blights  and  Experiments  in  the  Treatment  of  Red 

Spider."    Indian  Mus.  Notes,  Vol.  IV.,  No.  3,  pp.  113-117. 
GiJlette,  C.  P.,   1889.     "The  Red  Spider."     Bull.  4,  Iowa  Agri.  Exp.  Sta.,  pp. 

183,  184.     (Greenhouse  Control.) 
Glover,  T.,  1855.     "Insects  Frequenting  the  Cotton  Plant."     Rept.  U.  S.  Comm. 

Patents,  Agri.,  pp.  64-119,  Pis.  VI-X.     (Reference  to  red  spiders,  p.  79.) 
Harvey,  F.  L.,  1892.     "The  Two-Spotted  Mite."     Annual  Rept.  Me.  Agri.  Exp. 

Sta.,  pp.  1.33-146,  PI.  III.     (Original  description  of  Tclranychus  himacu^atus 

Harvey.) 
Maynard,  S.  T.,  1889.     "Experiments  in  Heating  Greenhouses."    Bull.  4,  Hatch 

Exp.  Sta.,  Mass.  Agri.  College.     (Reference  on  control  of  red  spiders,  pp. 

14,  15.) 
McGregor,  E.  A.,  1912.     "The  Red  Spider  on  Cotton."     Circ.  150,  Bur.  Ent., 

U.  S.  Dept.  Agri.,  pp.  1-13,  5  figs. 
McGregor,  E.  A.,  1913.     "The  Red  Spider  on  Cotton."     Circ.  172,  Bur.  Ent., 

U.  S.  Dept.  Agri.,  pp.  1-22,  12  figs. 
McGregor,  E.  A.,   1914.     "Red  Spider  Control."     In  Journ.  Econ.  Ent.,   Vol. 

VII.,  No.  4,  pp.  324-326. 


182       MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BUI4LETIN    179. 

McGregor,  E.  A.,  1916.     "The  Red  Spider  on  Cotton  and  How  to  Control  It." 

Farmers'  Bull.  735,  Bur.  Ent.,  U.  S.  Dept.  Agri.,  12  pp.,  10  figs. 
McGregor,  E.  A.,  and  McDonough,  F.  L.,  1917.     "The  Red  Spider  on  Cotton." 

Bull.  416,  Bur.  Ent.,  U.  S.  Dept.  Agri.,  prof,  paper,  72  pp.,  numerous  figs. 
Morgan,  H.  A.,  1897.     "Observations  on  the  Cotton  Mite."     Bull.  48,  La.  Agri, 

Exp.  Sta.,  pp.  130-135. 
Parker,  W.  B.,  1913.     "The  Red  Spider  on  Hops  in  the  Sacramento  Valley  of 

California."    Bull.  117,  Bur.  Ent.,  U.  S.  Dept.  Agri.,  pp.  1-41,  6  pis.,  9  figs. 
Parker,  W.  B.,  1913.     "Flour  Paste  as  a  Control  for  Red  Spiders  and  as  a  Spreader 

for  Contact  Insecticides."     Circ.  166,  Bur.  Ent.,  U.  S.  Dept.  Agri.,  5  pp., 

2  figs. 
Perkins,  G.  H.,  1897.     "The  Red  Spider."     Rept.  of  Ent.,  10th  Ann.  Rept.  Vt. 

Agri.  Exp.  Sta.,  pp.  75-86,  Figs.  1-4. 
Quayle,  H.  J.,  1912.     "Red  Spiders  and  Mites  of  Citrus  Trees."    Bull.  234,  Cal. 

Agri.  Exp.  Sta.,  pp.  483-530,  Figs.  1-35. 
Quayle,  H.  J.,  1913.     "Some  Natiiral  Enemies  of  Spiders  and  Mites."     Journ. 

Econ.  Ent.,  Vol.  VI.,  pp.  85-88. 
Russell,  H.  M.,  1908.     "Experiments  for  the  Control  of  the  Red  Spider  in  Florida." 

Journ.  Econ.  Ent.,  Vol.  I.,  pp.  377-380. 
Sirrine,  F.  A.,  1900.     "Insects  Affecting  Carnations."     Amer.  Florist,  Vol.  XV., 

No.  613,  pp.  909-913,  6  pis.    (Red  Spiders  on  Carnations  and  Control,  p.  910.) 
Surface,  H.  A.,  1906.     "Mites  or  Red  Spiders  on  Leaves."     Pa.  Dept.  Agri.  Mo. 

Bull.,  Div.  Z06I.,  Vol.  IV.,  No.  3,  pp.  95,  96.     (Recommends  spraying  with 

potassium  sulfid.) 
Taylor,  W.,   1896.     "Notes  on  Destroying  Red  Spider."     Journ.  Hort.,  Ser.  3, 

Vol.  XXXIII. ,  No.  854,  pp.  440,  441. 
Titus,  E.  S.  G.,  1905.     "Red  Spider  on  Cotton."    Bull.  54,  Bur.  Ent.,  U.  S.  Dept. 

Agri.,  pp.  87,  88. 
Titus,  E.  S.  G.,  1905.     "The  Cotton  Red  Spider."    Circ.  65,  Bur.  Ent.,  U.  S.  Dept. 

Agri.,  5  pp.,  2  figs. 
Volck,  W.  H.,   1903.     "Sulfur  Sprays  for  Red  Spiders."     Bull.   154,  Cal.  Agri. 

Exp.  Sta.,  11  pp.,  3  figs. 
Volck,  W.  H.,  1913.     "The  Control  of  Red  Spiders."     Monthly  Bull.  State  Com. 

Hort.,  Cal.,  Vol.  2,  pp.  356-363. 
Webster,    F.    M.,    1899.     "The   Chinch   Bug.     Experiments   with   Insecticides." 

Bull.  106,  Ohio  Agri.  Exp.  Sta.,  pp.  235-256,  5  figs.    (Carbon  Bisulfid  against 

Red  Spider,  pp.  254,  255.) 
Weldon,  G.  P.,  1909.     "Two  Common  Orchard  Mites."     Bull.  152,  Colo.  Agri. 

Exp.  Sta.,  12  pp.,  7  figs. 
Weldon,  G.  P.,  1910.     "Life  History  Notes  and  Control  of  the  Common  Orchard 

Mites."    Journ.  Econ.  Ent.,  Vol.  III.,  No.  5,  pp.  430-434. 
Wilson,  H.  F.,  1911.     "Notes  on  the  Red  Spider  Attacking  Cotton  in  South  Caro- 
lina."   Journ.  Econ.  Ent.,  Vol.  IV.,  pp.  337-339. 
Woglum,  R.  S.,  1909.     "Fumigation  Investigations  in  California."    Bull.  79,  Bur. 

Ent.,  U.  S.  Dept.  Agri.,  73  pp.,  28  figs.     (Citrus  Red  Spider,  p.  11.) 
Woodworth,  C.  W.,  1902.     "The  Red  Spiders  of  Citrus  Trees."     Bull.  145,  Cal. 

Agri.  Exp.  Sta.,  19  pp.,  5  figs. 
Woodworth,  C.  W.,  1903.     "Entomology."     Univ.  Cal.  Agri.  Exp.   Sta.    Rept., 

1901-03,  pp.  104-110.    (Red  Spider  Remedies,  p.  105.) 
Worsham,  E.  L.,  1910.     "The  Cotton  Red  Spider."    Bull.  92,  Ga.  Agri.  Exp.  Sta., 

pp.  135-141,  5  colored  plates. 


BULLETI]^   l^o.    180. 


DEPARTMENT    OF    AGRICULTURE. 


REPORT  OF  THE  CRANBERRY    SUBSTATION 

FOR  1916. 


BY  H.  J.  FRANKLIN. 


The  investigations  were  mainly  along  the  lines  pursued  in  1915.  Many- 
storage  tests  were  conducted  mth  the  fruit,  the  description  and  results  of 
which  will  be  found  particularly  interesting. 

Blueberry  Culture. 

A  quarter  of  an  acre  was  planted  with  six  distinct  strains  of  specially 
selected  and  bred  swamp  blueberry  stock  provided  by  the  Bureau  of  Plant 
Industry  of  the  United  States  Department  of  Agriculture.  This  was  done 
under  the  direction  of  Prof.  Frederick  V.  Coville,  for  the  most  part  on 
August  3 1,  about  375  plants  being  set  out.  The  rows  were  8  feet  apart,  and 
the  plants  were  set  at  intervals  of  4  feet  in  the  row.  Most  of  these  plants 
made  some  gro\vi:h  during  the  fall,  and  seemed  in  good  condition  when 
winter  began.  A  check  row  of  unselected  stock,  taken  from  a  neighboring 
swamp  and  planted  on  May  18,  grew  well  during  the  summer.  Many  supe- 
rior wild  plants  were  selected  when  in  fruit  and  marked  for  planting  in  19 17 
as  an  additional  check.  It  is  hoped  that  the  selected  blueberry  may  prove 
a  satisfactory  substitute  for  cranberries  on  bogs  v/here  conditions  make  the 
growing  of  the  latter  fruit  unprofitable.  The  commercial  growing  of  the 
blueberry  may  also  develop  enough  to  compete  with  that  of  the  cranberry 
in  the  cultivation  of  swamp  soils,  and  thus  provide  a  new  industry  for 
Massachusetts. 

Weather  Observations. 

Weather  observations  were  made  as  in  previous  years,  thermometer 
readings  and  amounts  of  precipitation  being  telegraphed  daily  to  the  Bos- 
ton office  of  the  Weather  Bureau  during  the  periods  of  frost  danger,  and 
frost  conditions  being  telephoned  to  growers  on  cold  nights  when  asked 
for.    The  frost  damage  on  the  Cape  this  season  was  negligible. 


184       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    180. 

Beginning  with  the  second  decade  in  May,  wet  weather  prevailed  more 
or  less  until  about  the  1st  of  August,  culminating  on  July  24  in  an  all-day 
rain  in  which  4.20  inches  fell  at  the  station  bog  in  twenty-four  hours,  this, 
because  of  the  previous  saturation  of  the  ground,  causing  the  streams  to 
rise  so  much  that  the  bogs  located  in  considerable  watersheds  were  generally 
flooded  in  spite  of  all  efforts  to  keep  the  water  down.  It  was  estimated 
that  over  1,000  acres  of  bearing  bog  on  the  Cape,  either  in  or  a  little  past 
the  blooming  period,  were  entirely  submerged  in  this  way. 

The  wet  season  provided  unusual  chances  to  study  the  effects  of  water 
on  the  blossoms  and  small  berries.  As  a  rule,  the  bogs  bloomed  heavily, 
and  for  a  time  a  record-breaking  crop  was  expected,  but  an  unusually 
large  proportion  of  the  blossoms  failed  to  set  fruit.  This  failure  took  place 
especially  among  the  under  berries,  for  the  crop  turned  out  to  be  more 
"on  top"  than  usual.  Almost  no  berries  were  commonly  found  in  thick 
clumps  of  vines  where  the  blossoms  had  been  very  abundant,  while  in  thin 
vines  near  by  there  was  a  fair  amount  of  fruit.  These  conditions  were  gen- 
eral, though  less  so  on  bogs  that  either  had  no  winter-flowage  or  had  it 
taken  off  early.  The  wet  weather  evidently  caused  this  failure  of  the  set, 
though  it  is  hard  to  say  definitely  how  it  did  so.  The  rain  may  have  pre- 
vented a  proper  fertilization  of  the  flowers  either  by  washing  off  the  pollen 
or  by  preventing  bees  from  working  actively.  Perhaps  an  unusual  preva- 
lence of  fungous  diseases  induced  by  the  excessive  moisture  blasted  the 
blossoms. 

It  is  the  writer's  present  opinion,  based  on  general  observation  and  ex- 
perience, that  late  holding  of  the  winter-flowage  so  throws  the  blossoming 
period  out  of  its  normal  season  that  the  danger  of  its  meeting  unfavorable 
conditions  for  the  setting  of  the  fruit  is  usually  considerably  increased 
thereby. 

That  flooding  when  the  berries  are  small  is  dangerous  was  shown  by  the 
effects  observed  on  some  bogs  submerged  for  not  over  fifteen  hours  with 
the  blooming  period  past  and  crop  fully  set.  These  bogs  lost  half  their 
berries  in  spite  of  the  cloudy  weather  that  prevailed  when  the  water  was 
let  off  and  for  three  days  afterward.  The  largest  of  the  berries  injured 
under  these  circumstances  were  somewhat  over  a  quarter  of  an  inch  in 
diameter.  Many  of  the  larger  berries  on  some  bogs,  however,  endured 
submergence  two  or  three  days  without  apparent  injury. 

Frost  Protection. 

In  the  fall  of  1915  tests  with  new  tobacco  cloth,  used  in  various  ways  or 
a  bog  with  much  moss  under  the  vines,  showed  no  considerable  temperatuv'  • 
advantage. 

In  the  spring  of  1916  this  cloth  was  tried  on  a  bog  that  was  fairly     e:; 
sanded  and  with  only  a  little  moss.    Green  registering  thermometers     '^'' 
used  in  all  the  tests.    Under  one  thickness  of  cloth  spread  on  the 
they  showed  a  higher  minimum  temperature  than  thermometers  r 
ered,  —  by  3  degrees  in  some  cases,  though  the  usual  difference  38 


REPORT   OF   CRANBERRY   SUBSTATION   FOR    1916.       185 

than  2  degrees.  Two  thicknesses  spread  on  the  vines  raised  the  minimum 
temperature  from  3|  to  5  degrees,  according  to  wind  conditions,  above 
that  over  the  unprotected  bog.  One  thickness  supported  on  wires  about 
hip  high  gave  a  medium  advantage  as  compared  with  the  single  and 
double  thicknesses  spread  on  the  vines. 

In  the  fall  these  tests  were  continued  on  patches  of  unpicked  vines  on 
the  station  bog,  and  a  maximum  advantage  of  about  3  degrees  with  a 
single  thickness  and  of  6  degrees  with  a  double  one  was  obtained.  More- 
over, this  advantage  continued  after  the  vines  had  been  covered  with  the 
cloth  continuously  day  and  night  for  nineteen  days  in  a  test  begun  Sep- 
tember 25  and  ended  October  14. 

The  experience  with  this  cloth  justifies  the  following  conclusions:  — 

(a)  This  protection  is  not  satisfactory  on  bogs  with  much  moss  under 
the  vines  because  of  the  reduced  radiation  on  such  bogs. 

(b)  Good  secondhand  cloth  is  so  hard  to  get  that  its  use  is  not  practi- 
cable. 

(c)  One  thickness  of  new  cloth  is  not  enough  when  spread  on  the  vines. 

(d)  The  difficulties  and  expense  of  wire  supports  prohibit  their  use. 

(e)  With  two  thicknesses  spread  on  the  vines,  the  protection  is  proba- 
bly sufficient  for  most  of  the  Cape  bogs,  and  this  seems  the  best  way  to  use 
it.  It  is  too  bulky  to  handle  easily  on  large  areas,  but  it  may  be  left  on  a 
bog  continuously  during  quite  a  long  cold  period  without  reducing  the 
protection  afforded. 

(/)  It  is  better  to  protect  with  water  if  it  can  be  done  at  reasonable 
expense. 

Howes  ^  berries  that  had  undergone  various  low  temperatures  were 
picked  and  examined  on  November  15,  as  follows:  — 

1.  Of  433  berries  that  had  endured  a  temperature  of  15^°  F.,  375  were 
entirely  sound  and  58  were  soft.  Eighteen  of  the  latter  showed  unmis- 
takably that  they  had  decayed  from  fungous  disease,  leaving  only  40,  or 
9.64  per  cent.,  that  could  have  been  softened  by  frost;  and  perhaps  even 
this  figure  should  be  reduced  on  account  of  fungous  rot  that  could  not  be 
distinguished. 

2.  Of  442  berries  that  had  undergone  a  temperature  of  13|°  F.,  340  were 
sound  and  102  soft.  Of  the  latter,  26  showed  that  they  had  rotted  because 
of  fungous  diseases,  this  leaving  76,  or  18.27  per  cent.,  that  might  have 
been  frosted. 

3.  Of  444  berries  exposed  to  a  temperature  of  9°  F.,  200  seemed  entirely 
sound,  244  being  soft.  Twenty  of  the  latter  evidently  had  been  softened 
by  diseases,  leaving  only  224,  or  52.83  per  cent.,  that  could  have  been  hurt 
by  frost. 

•  This  variety  has  been  called  "Late  Howe"  in  previous  reports  of  the  cranberry  substation. 
The  writer  is  informed  that  it  was  first  taken  from  the  wild,  and  cultivated  by  the  late  James  P. 
Howes  of  East  Dennis,  Howes  being  a  common  family  name  in  that  part  of  Cape  Cod.  As 
"  Howe"  is  evidently  a  corruption,  and  as  "late"  is  superfluous,  all  the  varieties  that  have  been 
called  "Howe"  being  late,  the  name  Howes  is  considered  more  appropriate  and  is  therefore  used 
in  this  report. 


186       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    180. 

The  temperatures  here  recorded  were  taken  with  Green  minimum  regis- 
tering thermometers  hung  just  over  the  vines  bearing  the  berries.  The 
fruit  was  well  colored  when  it  underwent  these  temperatures. 

Several  tests  in  both  1915  and  1916  showed  that  the  temperature  at 
which  freezing  begins  among  ripened  Early  Black  or  Howes  cranberries 
is  at  or  slightly  above  22°  F.,  no  softening  resulting  from  exposure  to  23°. 

The  records  of  minimum  temperatures  at  the  station  bog  from  1911  to 
1916,  inclusive,  show  that  no  temperature  low  enough  to  harm  well-colored 
berries  appreciably  occurred  in  any  picking  season  of  those  six  years. 

The  results  of  these  investigations  show  that,  for  bogs  in  warm  or  aver- 
age locations  that  are  flooded  by  pumping,  it  is  unprofitable  in  the  long 
run  to  try  to  protect  well-colored  berries  from  frost,  especially  if  the  crop 
is  light. 

Fungous  Diseases. 

These  investigations  were  conducted,  as  in  previous  years,  in  co-opera- 
tion with  the  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry  of  the  United  States  Department 
of  Agriculture,  Dr.  C.  L.  Shear  and  his  assistant,  Dr.  Neil  E.  Stevens, 
visiting  the  Cape  several  times  during  the  season,  the  latter  spending  sev- 
eral weeks  at  the  station,  and  both  giving  sustained  and  aggressive  atten- 
tion to  the  more  technical  side  of  the  work  during  a  considerable  period  in 
the  growing  season  and  throughout  the  fall  and  early  winter. 

Table  1  is  the  season's  record  of  the  principal  Bordeaux  mixture  spraying 
plots,  experiments  with  which  have  been  described  in  previous  reports. 
None  of  these  plots  were  treated  this  year,  but  the  record  is  included  here 
to  show  the  effects  on  the  1916  crop  of  the  spraying  done  in  former  years. 
Plots  A,  B,  C,  D  and  E  were  all  sprayed  in  1911,  1912  and  1913.  The 
treatment  was  continued  on  plots  A,  B  and  D  in  1914,  but  was  stopped 
on  C  and  E.  It  was  further  continued  on  A  (entire  plot)  and  on  one-half  of 
B  and  one-half  of  D  in  1915.  Plots  15  and  "  1913"  were  sprayed  in  1913, 
1914  and  1915.  The  whole  of  plot  15  has  been  treated  with  a  complete 
mixture  of  commercial  fertilizers  for  several  years,  as  was  also  the  middle 
part  of  A  in  1913  and  1914.  All  the  plots  were  picked  with  scoops  as  hereto- 
fore. Where  two  checks  were  taken  they  were  laid  out  on  opposite  sides 
of  the  plot.  The  entire  sections  on  which  D  and  E  are  located,  being 
small,  were  used  as  checks.  The  fruit  used  in  the  storage  tests  was  stored, 
without  separating,  in  quart  cans  with  the  covers  on  tight,  but  not  sealed, 
the  berries  being  taken  by  hand  from  different  parts  of  the  picking  crates, 
all  the  crates  picked  being  thus  represented  in  the  cans  in  most  cases. 


REPORT   OF   CRANBERRY   SUBSTATION   FOR    1916.       187 


cent- 

e  of 

tten 

nd 

.rtly 

itten 

rries 

at 

id  of 

)rage 

eat. 

OS 

o 

cq 

« 

10 

t~ 

0 

^ 

00 

CO 

<?q 

00 

^ 

f^ 

cq 

CO 

in 

"5 
CO 

C<1 

CO 

CO 
00 

CO 

0 

•* 

5 

0 

00 
00 

•^ 

0 

N 

|^^°^^(§(S 

W^^ 

CO 

Ol 

M 

CO 

M 

O) 

•0 

■* 

Tji 

C-J 

CO 

s 

•>}< 

s 

■* 

n 

CO 

•<1< 

t~ 

t~ 

CJ 

eq 

■* 

•»j< 

0 

0 

00 

00 

M 

M 

cq 

> 

>■ 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

^ 

CJ 

y- 

u 

> 

> 

d 

0 

o 

o 

o 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

ll> 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

(U 

0 

^ 

z 

^ 

^ 

;z: 

'z 

•z. 

iz; 

;z: 

p 

P 

p 

p 

12: 

^ 

p 

p 

s 

3 

s 

s 

0 

s 

0 

0 

s 

B 

s 

0 

5 

S 

3 

B 

2 

^^ 

•^ 

•^ 

■^ 

■* 

t^ 

^^ 

t~ 

^ 

•^ 

O) 

C3 

05 

OS 

•^ 

^ 

CO 

eo 

% 

cq 

<M 

w 

C^l 

^ 

^ 

^ 

^J 

4J 

^ 

D. 

0, 

O4 

D* 

•^ 

p. 

0* 

& 

o 

u 

o 

0 

0 

0 

a 

u 

0 

0 

0> 

0 

0 

0 

V 

(1) 

o 

O 

O 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

tB 

m 

OT 

M 

0 

0 

CO 

CO 

Quan- 
tity of 
Fruit 
placed 

in 
Storage 

^? 

03 

t- 

00 

00 

o> 

00 

t^ 

00 

00 

00 

00 

CO 

CO 

00 

« 

CO 

CO 

Quan- 
tity of 

Fruit 

per 

Square 

Rod 

PQ    » 

CO 

M 

1(5 

0 

^ 

•* 

OJ 

00 

0 

t~ 

OS 

OS 

00 

CO 

1^ 

b- 

00 

t- 

CO 

00 

<3 

c» 

tr- 

<» 

00 

i> 

10 

OS 

OS 

t~ 

■^. 

CO 

"O   , 

«o.ie§-g 

t^ 

t^ 

CO 

0 

CO 

CO 

b- 

00 

CO 

CO 

0 

10 

00 

0 

CO 

t» 

<o 

CO 

CO 

CO 

00 

co 

t~ 

00 

00 

"5 

c^ 

00 

CJ 

00 

CO 

§  >.g-g  3 

JO 

CO 

lO 

ui 

•>lJ 

to 

t>; 

PJ 

ei 

^ 

ci 

0 

U5 

CO 

00 

ci 

^ 

oi 

o-igi^^S 

a> 

" 

""■ 

eo 

C<1 

CO 

o 

. 

•* 

•>!< 

■* 

•>s< 

b- 

t- 

t^ 

■* 

"* 

en 

OS 

CT> 

0 

■>»l 

•<ii 

eo 

eo 

^"S^d 

e;i 

<M 

Ol 

cj 

^-M  — 

P.S2 

•♦^ 

+j 

a 

0. 

P. 

a 

P< 

P. 

O 

t> 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

5? 

0 

0) 

0} 

0 

0 

0) 

V 

Ci 

o 

O 

O 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

m 

m 

CO 

CQ 

0 

0 

to 

03 

>> 

• 

• 

2 

M 

M 

M 

,M 

,il 

,ij 

0 

0 

0 

0 

t> 

0 

C3 

OS 

C3 

03 

03 

03 

C3 

> 

c 

c^ 

C3 

a 

^ 

^ 

« 

S 

n 

5 

^ 

. 

S 

S 

s 

s 

s 

s 

c4 

c3 

1h 

C3 

s 

i 

>> 

>, 

>) 

>, 

i 

I 

>, 

>, 

s 

^ 

^ 

& 

P^ 

Pm 

^ 

& 

^ 

T^ 

'n 

& 

^ 

'7^ 

o 

o 

o 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

ce 

C3 

03 

^ 

0 

0 

03 

^ 

w 

W 

w 

K 

§ 

s 

S 

w 

w 

K] 

W 

W 

w 

w 

a 

W 

w 

5   Cj    M 

-^S 

-2 

"2 

00 

00 

•><< 

•>*< 

t- 

t^ 

CO 

CO 

e<i 

CO 

0 

CO 

CO 

OS 

eo 

■<J" 

•^ 

a 

T3 

V  i 

, 

, 

, 

, 

■O 

, 

, 

go 

1 

Ah 

•73' 

-o" 

"d" 

•T3" 

•o 

-a 

M 

-0* 

13 

T3* 

13" 

-o 

gn  o 

0 

<u 

0 

0 

(U 

<a 

D< 

0 

0 

a> 

V 

V 

>. 

>. 

>. 

>. 

>. 

>. 

>. 

>. 

t». 

>, 

>. 

o32 

C3 

03 

03 

03 

cS 

03 

(4-1 

03 

03 

03 

03 

03 

52 

■B 

•a 

(-• 

r3 

M 

t4 

t-< 

ti 

-^ 

(H 

u 

b. 

T) 

u 

13 

Ui 

o 

<o 

0. 

P. 

J? 

0, 

0. 

c 

P. 

03 

P. 

P. 

P. 

p. 

9 

P. 

V 

>> 

>> 

00 

>> 

m 

m 

•^ 

m 

00 

>> 

on 

>> 

m 

^ 

s 

p. 

02 

jj 

03 
1 

.^ 

.^ 

<!> 

.^j 

2 
eg- 

2 
p, 

CO 

^ 

^ 

1 

1 

1 

1 

^ 

1 

0 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

. 

10 

OD 

0 

« 

• 

«n 

C3 

• 

"p. 

H 

u 

n 

10 

0 

u 

oa 

_g 

;2 

Plots  and 

1 

1 

.9 
13 

2 

13 

2 
p. 

n 

3 
8 

'-3 

'c3 

10 

P. 
"0 

_2 

73 

m 

^ 

g. 

§ 

3 

1 

3 

S 

^ 

T3 

"3 

■a 

1 

8 

0 

M 

u 

S 

• 

^ 

§ 

0) 

r  _ 

; 

Ji 

1 

.d 

^ 

03 

03 

M 

0 

.13 

^ 

eo 

CO 

>. 

if. 

0 

0. 

0. 

C^ 

V 

0 

03 

V 

s 

s 

h 

^ 

<; 

<! 

< 

< 

m 

M 

m 

d 

0 

Q 

p 

c4' 

H 

P. 

0 

188       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    180. 


CQ 


C!5 


fi. 


S  •S 


CIS 

fen 


^ 


►J 
m 
■< 
H 


Percent- 
age of 
Rotten 

and 
Partly 
Rotten 
Berries 

at 

End  of 

Storage 

Test. 

u? 

o 

CO 

o 
oi 

to 

CO 
CO 

00 

o 

t- 

r- 

Ui 

UJ 

^ 

p 

d 

a" 

d 

s 

03 

<3 

OS 

^ 

l-» 

l-» 

•-s 

M^ 

o 

O 

o 

o 

-M 

-tJ 

-*J 

CO 

CO 

c^ 

CVl 

c^ 

o 

•r" 

o 

a 
O 

ft 

Quan- 
tity of 
Fruit 
placed 

in 
Storage 

Test 
(Bush- 
els). ' 

CO 

■o< 

■* 

■* 

Quan- 
tity of 
Fruit 
per 
Square 

Rod 
(Bush- 
els). 

5S 

s 

S 

■»; 

t>- 

o 

.  .„       ^5    1 

s«-qS-s^ 

t^ 

eo 

"5 

o 

00 

3  >.2"3  343 

CO 

o 

>o 

CO 

a-Sf^^B" 

o 

eo 

eo 

CQ 

Ol 

m-C     . 

04 

c< 

"  OUi 

oSpii!  :r 

Q.S2 

u 

ti 

ft 
O 

& 

'ft 

O 

o 

M 

in 

^ 

• 

o 

Ai 

M 

c3 
> 

a 

a 

rt 

03 

« 

5 

1Z 

^ 

03 

03 

>, 

_>, 

fe 

f^ 

b 

Ui 

o 

C3 

03 

s 

S 

W 

w 

o    . 

^03*00 

■'S 

em 

2  St3 

^- 

CO 

00 

C<l 

a 

T3 

ft  b 

TS" 

•a" 

m  O 

V 

« 

>, 

>. 

"a 

a 

TS" 

g 

a> 

ft 

O 

ft 

©  '^ 

>. 

>. 

g 
^ 

o 

ft 

o 

S 

o 

S 

S 

_fl 

.9 

-2 

•< 

2 
ft 

g 

o 

o 

a 

t. 

1 

1 

i 

3 

^ 
^ 

a 

J3 

pq 

P3 

Q 

Q 

REPORT   OF    CRANBERRY   SUBSTATION   FOR    1916.       189 

The  table  shows  that  as  a  rule  the  areas  sprayed  in  1915  were  less  pro- 
ductive in  1916  than  their  untreated  checks,  and  that  the  fruit  from  these 
sprayed  areas  was  inferior  in  keeping  quality  in  all  cases  in  1916.  In  this 
connection  the  figures  given  for  plots  B  and  D  in  Table  2,  taken  from  the 
last  report  of  the  substation  (Bulletin  No.  168,  page  3),  are  of  interest. 

Judging  by  the  results  of  the  1915  and  1916  storage  tests  given  in 
Tables  1  and  2,  the  resistance  of  the  plants  to  the  attack  of  fungous  dis- 
eases had  been  weakened  by  the  injury  caused  by  Bordeaux  mixture 
described  in  previous  reports. 

Three  plots,  numbered,  respectively,  B.  L.  1,  B.  L.  2  and  B.  L.  3,  were 
sprayed  with  "Black-Leaf  40"  used  at  the  rate  of  1  part  to  400  parts  of 
water,  2  pounds  of  resin  fish-oil  soap  to  50  gallons  being  added  to  spread 
and  stick  the  spray,  on  the  dates  and  with  the  results  shown  in  Table  3. 
These  plots  and  their  checks  were  all  picked  with  scoops.  The  storage- 
test  fruit  was  stored,  without  separating,  in  quart  cans  with  covers  on 
tight  but  not  sealed,  the  berries  being  taken  by  hand  from  different  parts 
of  the  picking  crates,  all  the  crates  being  thus  represented. 

The  spray  evidently  did  not  much  affect  the  quantity  of  fruit,  and  the 
storage  tests  showed  no  fungicidal  value  for  it.  This  was  not  entirely  a 
fair  test,  as  all  the  sprayed  areas  had  been  treated  with  complete  commer- 
cial fertilizer  mixtures  in  1915,  but  the  impairment  in  keeping  quahty 
shown  by  the  sprayed  berries  as  compared  with  the  check  fruit  was  in  all': 
cases  greater  than  that  heretofore  found  by  the  writer  to  have  resulted' 
from  the  use  of  fertilizers.  Did  this  spray  have  a  harmful  effect  in  this; 
regard  in  some  way? 

Two  plots,  numbered  A.  L.  1  and  A.  L.  2,  were  sprayed  with  "Corona" 
arsenate  of  lead,  used  at  the  rate  of  3  pounds  to  50  gallons  of  water,  on  the- 
dates  and  with  the  results  shown  in  Table  4.  These  plots  and  their  checks 
were  picked  with  scoops,  and  the  storage-test  fruit  was  selected  and  stored 
in  the  same  way  as  that  of  the  "Black-Leaf  40"  plots. 


190       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    180. 


? 

CO 
CO 

s 


►-^ 


a^ 


s 

5 


.t 


CO 

s 


u  "  4jT3T3  43'C-e_i  ram 

t-MOcscJoSHaOf!: 


.9  a 

is  =« 


aSf-^SB" 


■2-2  g"? 


="2  >.  • 

C>.S  CQ  bD 
d£  D,-S 


<B  3  o3  M 


eo       OS        CO       00 


C^         C^         M 


Pi    Z    ^    ^    ^ 
o      o     o      o      o 


p 

CO        CO        tQ        lO 


TO       M       O       O       02       tZJ 


00        CO        CO        00        CD 


W        CO        CO 


CO        CO        us        U5        «0        CO 


CO        00        GO        O 


mm  .-mm 

>^    >?  i    I    >•    >> 

ca       cs  o       O       C3       ci 

W     W  K     K     W     W 


►J     tJ     hJ     vJ     kJ     iJ 

m   m   m'   m'   m'   m' 


REPORT   OF   CRANBERRY   SUBSTATION   FOR    1916.       191 


-^ 


c^ 


H 

W 
< 


Percent- 
age of 
Rotten 

and 
Partly 
Rotten 
Berries 
found  at 
End  of 
Storage 
Test. 

s; 

S3 

o 

o 

CM 

CO 

o 
o 

<o 

CO 

CO 

to 

o 

5 

CO 

« 

CO 

CO 

^ 

to 

lO 

U3 

CS 

c» 

OS 

CM 

N 

e^ 

CI 

CM 

CM 

■ii 

t^ 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

■S| 

o 

o 

0 

o 

o 

o 

^ 

:z; 

'^ 

^i 

^ 

^ 

ll 

2 

5 

2 

5 

o 

o 

lO 

lO 

to 

CO 

CO 

CO 

PM5 

M 

CT 

Ol 

CM 

cq 

m 

^j 

a 

a 

a 

a 

a 

a 

<a 

<» 

v 

a 

« 

o 

xa 

CQ 

w 

m 

CB 

m 

On       '^ 

1     tM              .FH      V                QQ 

Quan 
tity  o 
Fruit 
laced 
Storag 
Test 
Quart 

00 

oo 

00 

■^ 

cq 

CM 

II                     a-     - 

Quan- 
tity of 
Fruit 
Per 
Square 
Rod 
(Bush- 
els). 

<M 

« 

o 

o 

= 

o 

S 

"^ 

^^ 

"^ 

'^ 

•^ 

"^ 

■o  , 

co-tSS-S^ 

o 

t^ 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

to 

00 

■* 

o 

3^2"3j^ 

rt 

CO 

OJ 

oi 

to 

to 

Q,.;Sfe-m« 

'^ 

o 

. 

«ra 

"5 

•o 

_ 

^^ 

^ 

(M 

'^ 

'^. 

°^. 

1 

i 

1 

i 

% 

a 

02 

m 

02 

cc 

OQ 

m 

.« 

Ol 

o 

o?  >>    • 

(l).i3  03  M 

■^j3  fc  a 

Ul 

1 

1 

bb 

1 

C3EJ  ft-" 

pHco 

3 

3 
<1 

« 

- 

o  o  g  M 

b!) 

1 

1 

bi) 

1 

1 

■cs  g  a-S 

3 

3 

POJM 

-< 

< 

.« 

00 

oo 

O-H'  >>    . 

M 

CM 

Date 

Firs 

Spra: 

ing 

3 

1 

1 

s 

3 

1-5 

1 

' 

<D     . 

^   ^^^ 

S  c3  tn 

£  §■« 

o 

<o 

o 

OS 

to 

to 

^i« 

>, 

2 

•c 

^ 

M 

.i<i 

rM 

.M 

M 

C3 

o 

u 

o 

o 

o 

> 

a 

CD 

C3 

03 

c3 

a 

p-:^ 

S 

s 

s 

S 

s 

m 

_>. 

>. 

>t 

>. 

>. 

>. 

Ut 

'u 

Ih 

"^ 

Tk 

'^ 

ca 

cU 

03 

<A 

si 

W 

w 

w 

w 

W 

H 

oi 

t<s 

^ 

u 

» 

H 

o 

^ 

^ 

^ 

^ 

*"• 

« 

^H 

W 

-g 

-g 

■g 

•< 

(1> 

a> 

eJ 

S 

V 

.« 

.a 

j3 

^ 

1 

i4 

o 

3 

i4 

3 

3 

O 

<i 

'^ 

'^ 

<i 

CM 

e^ 

"o 

>4 

>4 

O- 

h4 

a 

< 

< 

s 

< 

< 

192       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION    BULLETIN    180. 

The  table  shows  little  if  any  increase  in  yield  from  this  treatment.  The 
berries  of  both  plots,  however,  showed  a  rather  remarkable  improvement 
in  keeping  quality  over  the  fruit  of  the  unsprayed  checks,  especially  when 
the  small  number  and  lateness  of  the  treatments  are  considered.  In  both 
cases  the  two  checks  were  laid  out  on  opposite  sides  of  the  plot. 

While  these  tests  are  not  enough  to  prove  a  fungicidal  value  for  arsenate 
of  lead  in  the  treatment  of  any  cranberry  disease,  their  results  are  sugges- 
tive. It  should  be  recalled  in  this  connection  that  this  insecticide  is  a  well- 
proved  treatment  for  apple  scab.  Dr.  Shear  found  that  most  of  the  rot 
in  Early  Black  berries  produced  by  the  station  bog  this  year  was  due  to 
anthracnose,  a  disease  caused  by  a  fungus  known  to  science  as  Glomerella 
rufomaculans  vaccinii  Shear. 

To  test  further  the  possibility  of  controlling  fungous  diseases  by  putting 
copper  sulfate  in  the  flowage,  experimental  flooding  sections  23  and  27  of 
the  station  bog  were  treated,  as  in  1915,  with  this  chemical  in  the  June 
reflow  at  the  rate  of  1  part  to  50,000  parts  of  water  (1  pound  in  6,250  gal- 
lons). The  treatment  was  applied  June  14  after  the  sections  had  been 
completely  submerged  for  twelve  hours,  and  the  water  was  then  held 
thirty  hours  longer.  Even  distribution  of  the  chemical  was  obtained  by 
pulling  it  around  in  a  sack  in  the  water  as  it  dissolved.  The  areas  thus 
treated  showed  no  definite  advantage  either  in  the  quantity  or  the  keeping 
quality  of  the  fruit,  as  compared  with  the  untreated  flooding  sections 
adjoining  them. 

It  seemed  to  be  the  general  opinion  among  the  Cape  growers  that  cran- 
berries as  a  rule  kept  distinctly  better  than  usual  this  year  in  spite  of  the 
wet  weather  in  the  first  half  of  the  growing  season. 

The  hypertrophy  of  the  tender  vegetative  shoots,  frequently  called 
"false  blossom"  by  the  growers,  and  for  which  Dr.  Shear  has  suggested 
the  name  "rose  bloom,"  was  unusually  abundant  on  the  station  bog 
this  season.  It  has  been  thought  that  the  moisture  conditions  attending 
late  holding  of  the  winter-flowage,  excessive  reflowage,  deficient  drainage 
or  excessive  and  continual  rainfall  greatly  favor  the  development  of  the 
fungus  {Exobasidium  oxycocci  Rostr.)  which  causes  this  disease.  The  late 
holding  of  the  winter-flowage  in  both  1915  and  1916  in  conjunction  with  the 
very  rainy  season  may,  therefore,  partly  explain  its  prevalence  on  the  bog. 

An  unusual  occurrence  with  this  disease  was  its  attack  on  the  blossoms, 
its  effects  hitherto,  so  far  as  observed,  being  confined  to  the  leafy  shoots. 
As  estimated  from  3  to  4  per  cent,  of  the  Howes  blossoms  on  the  station 
bog  were  conspicuouslj^  deformed  by  the  disease  between  July  20  and 
August  1,  when  this  effect  was  most  marked.  An  occasional  Early  Black 
flower  was  also  affected.  A  few  of  the  small  berries  were  somewhat 
swollen  and  discolored  by  the  disease,  and  covered  with  the  spores  of  the 
fungus.  That  this  attack  on  the  flowers  and  small  berries  probably  was 
due  mainly  to  the  prolonged  spell  of  wet  weather  was  shown  by  the  prompt 
disappearance  of  the  disease  on  both  blossoms  and  vines  when  the  wet 
season  ended. 


REPORT   OF   CRANBERRY   SUBSTATION   FOR    1916.       193 

Dr.  Shear  has  recently  published  a  valuable  paper  ^  on  the  false  blossom 
disease  that  does  so  much  harm  in  Wisconsin  and  has  heretofore  been 
reported  *  as  having  been  introduced  into  Massachusetts  and  New  Jersey. 

Storage  Tests. 

The  description  of  all  these  experiments  that  seemed  to  give  results  of 
much  interest  are  arranged  in  the  groups  listed  below.  Those  in  group 
No.  1  were  planned  by  the  writer  and  conducted  by  Prof.  F.  W.  Morse, 
research  chemist  of  the  Massachusetts  Agricultural  Experiment  Station. 
Group  No.  2  was  planned  and  carried  out  by  Dr.  N.  E,  Stevens.  Nos.  4, 
6  (c),  7,  10  and  13  were  planned  and  conducted  by  the  writer.  Nos.  3,  5, 
6  (a)  and  (b),  8  and  11  were  planned  by  Drs.  Shear  and  Stevens,  and  were 
carried  out  by  them  co-operatively  with  the  writer.  No.  12  was  planned 
and  conducted  co-operatively  by  Dr.  Stevens  and  the  writer. 

Some  of  the  tests  were  conducted  with  berries  in  quart  cans,  with  covers 
on  tight  but  not  sealed,  and  others  with  fruit  in  bushel  picking  crates 
stored  in  carefully  arranged  stacks.  A  comparison  of  the  percentages  of 
decay  found  in  the  crates  and  the  cans  shows  strikingly  the  harmful  effect 
of  the  lack  of  ventilation  in  the  latter,  this  being  so  great  that  it  perhaps 
invalidates  the  results  of  the  can  tests. 

In  all  the  tests,  except  those  of  groups  1,  2,  9,  11  and  13,  the  fruit  was 
examined  by  cup  samples  by  the  screeners  emploj^ed  at  the  station  during 
the  fall,  under  the  writer's  supervision,  the  inspector's  cup  of  the  New 
England  Cranberry  Sales  Company  being  used  for  sampling.  The  Sales 
Company's  hand  grader  was  used  to  facilitate  the  work.  All  the  berries 
stored  in  cans  were  included  in  samples  and  examined. 

The  "nine-sample"  method  was  largely  used  in  examining  the  crates. 
In  this  method  nine  samples  from  each  crate  were  counted,  one  being  taken 
from  the  top  or  surface  berries  at  each  end;  one  from  the  surface  berries 
at  the  middle;  one  from  the  berries  halfway  between  the  top  and  bottom 
at  each  end;  one  from  the  very  center;  one  from  the  very  bottom  at  each 
end;  and  one  from  the  bottom  at  the  middle. 

The  "seven-sample"  method  was  used  in  examining  some  of  the  crated 
berries,  and  the  wTiter  thinks  this  method  is  as  satisfactory  as  any  likely 
to  be  devised  for  determining  the  condition  of  berries  thus  stored,  consid- 
erable defects  in  the  other  methods  so  far  employed  having  been  discovered. 
In  this  method  seven  samples  from  each  crate  were  examined,  one  being 
taken  from  the  surface  berries  of  each  half  of  the  crate  halfway  between  the 
middle  and  the  end;  one  from  each  half  of  the  crate  halfway  between  the 
top  and  the  bottom  and  halfway  between  the  center  and  the  end;  one 
from  the  very  center;  'and  one  from  the  very  bottom  of  each  half  of  the 
crate  halfway  between  the  middle  and  end. 

All  the  tests  except  those  of  the  first,  second,  eleventh  and  thirteenth 

>  False  Blossom  of  the  Cultivated  Cranberry,  Bui.  No.  444,  U.  S.  Dept.  Agr.,  November,  1916. 
«  Bui.  No.  160,  Mass.  Agr.  Expt.  Sta.,  1915,  pp.  99  and  100,  and  Bui.  No.  168,  Mass.  Agr.  Expt. 
Sta.,  1916,  p.  5. 


194       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    180. 

groups  were  conducted  in  the  basement  of  the  station  screenhouse,  this 
having  a  floor  and  walls  of  concrete  and  providing  fairlj'-  even  temperatures. 

A  Friez  hygro-thermograph  provided  by  the  Bureau  of  Plant  Industry 
and  kept  in  the  storage  room  during  most  of  the  period  when  the  tests 
were  in  progress  gave  the  following  temperature  and  humidity  records:  — 

Between  September  29  and  October  1  the  temperature  fell  from  77°  F. 
to  60°  F.  Between  October  1  and  October  5  it  ranged  between  61°  and 
54°.  As  the  mainspring  of  the  hj^gro -thermograph  clock  broke  on  October 
5  the  records  were  discontinued  until  October  25.  Beginning  on  that 
date  the  ranges  in  temperature  by  weeks  were  as  follows:  October  25  to 
November  1,  from  57°  to  53°;  November  1  to  November  8,  from  53°  to 
47°;  November  8  to  November  15,  from  51°  to  44°;  November  15  to 
November  22,  from  47°  to  38°;  November  22  to  November  29,  from  51° 
to  38°;  November  29  to  December  6,  from  51°  to  43°;  December  6  to 
December  13,  from  49°  to  40°;  December  13  to  December  20,  from  42° 
to  29°;  December  20  to  December  24,  from  41°  to  34°. 

Between  September  29  and  October  5  the  relative  humidity  ranged  from 
95  to  59  per  cent.,  and  was  subject  to  much  influence  from  frequent  open- 
ing of  the  storage  room.  Beginning  with  October  25  the  ranges  in  relative 
humidity  by  weeks  were  as  follows:  October  25  to  November  1,  from  85 
to  72  per  cent.;  November  1  to  November  8,  from  85  to  69  per  cent.; 
November  8  to  November  15,  from  85  to  60  per  cent.;  November  15  to 
November  22,  from  73  to  60  per  cent.;  November  22  to  November  29, 
from  86  to  53  per  cent.;  November  29  to  December  6,  from  75  to  46  per 
cent.;  December  6  to  December  13,  from  71  to  50  per  cent.;  December 
13  to  December  20,  from  72  to  53  per  cent.;  December  20  to  December 
24,  from  79  to  55  per  cent. 

The  storage  room  was  kept  tightly  closed  from  October  25  to  December 
24,  except  as  the  making  of  observations  made  entrance  necessary.  In 
spite  of  this,  the  fluctuations  in  relative  humidity  were  marked  and  rapid, 
it  evidently  being  influenced  much  more  by  outside  weather  conditions 
than  by  the  stored  berries. 

The  storage  tests  conducted  fall  conveniently  into  groups,  as  follows :  — 

1.  Weight  Shrinkage  of  Sound  Cranberries  in  Storage  is  due  largely,  if  not 
entirely,  to  Losses  Incidental  to  the  Process  of  Respiration,  not  to  Loss  of 
Water  by  Evaporation.  —  To  determine  this.  Professor  Morse  weighed  and 
analyzed  different  lots  of  Howes  berries,  obtained  from  the  same  source, 
on  various  dates  and  with  results  as  shown  in  Table  5.  Professor  Morse 
provides  the  following  data  concerning  this  work:  — 

The  cranberries  were  received  at  the  chemical  laboratory  the  first  week  in  De- 
cember. 

On  December  8,  eight  approximately  equal  lots  of  carefully  selected  sound  berries 
were  weighed  into  glass  jars.  The  mouths  of  the  jars  were  covered  with  a  thin 
filter  paper  held  in  place  by  rubber  bands,  and  they  were  inverted  in  a  slat-bottomed 
box  and  placed  in  a  cool  closet,  the  temperature  of  which  ranged  between  35°  and 
60°  F. 


REPORT   OF   CRANBERRY   SUBSTATION   FOR    1916.       195 

The  berries  were  put  into  jars  to  prevent  too  free  circulation  of  air,  and  the  jars 
were  inverted  to  permit  the  heavy  carbon  dioxide  gas  to  diffuse  through  the  filter 
paper  and  escape.  Beginning  December  16,  and  thereafter  at  fortnightly  intervals, 
a  jar  was  removed  from  the  closet.  The  contents  were  weighed,  rotten  berries 
were  picked  out  and  weighed,  and  a  sample  of  sound  berries  was  used  for  an  esti- 
mation of  the  actual  dry  matter  in  the  fruits. 

Each  successive  date  showed  more  and  more  decayed  fruit,  and  on  March  17 
the  last  two  jars  were  removed  together,  because  it  seemed  useless  to  continue  the 
experiment  further. 


Table  5.  ■ —  Analyses  of  Cranberries.  —  Dry-Matter  Content  at  End   oj 
Various  Periods  of  Storage. 


Lot. 

Weight 
Decem- 
ber 8 
(Grams). 

Date 
reweighed 

and 
analyzed. 

Weight 

after 
Keeping 
(Grams). 

Loss 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Dry 

Matter 

in  Sound 

Fruit 

(Per 
Gent.). 

Weight 

of 

Rotten 

Fruit 

(Grams). 

A. 
B, 

c, 

D, 
E, 
F, 
G, 
H, 

153.4 
156.8 
158.1 
158.5 
158.6 
161.3 
161.7 
164.9 

Dec.  16 
Jan.     2 
Jan.   16 
Feb.    2 
Feb.  16 
Mar.    3 
Mar.  17 
Mar.  17 

152.7 
154.9 
154.7 
153.8 
152.8 
154.5 
153.2 
157.0 

1.2 
2.1 
2.9 
3.6 

4.2 
5.2 
4.7 

12.12 
12.14 
11.87 
11.94 
11.94 
12.02 
11.82 

25.4 
44.7 
67.6 
70.0 
85.3 
92.7 
89.0 

Professor  Morse  remarks  concerning  these  results  as  follows :  — 

The  loss  in  weight  is  due  partly  to  the  shrinkage  in  the  decayed  berries,  which 
is  caused  by  decomposition  and  evaporation. 

The  sound  fruit  showed  a  small  but  positive  diminution  in  dry  matter  after  the 
first  fortnight,  but  not  an  increasing  one.  Only  by  weighing  individual  berries 
could  it  be  positively  determined  how  much  the  cranberry  loses  in  weight  while 
yet  sound.  The  small  shrinkage  in  proportion  of  dry  matter  indicates  that  respi- 
ratory destruction  occurs,  as  in  apples,  pears,  etc. 


2.  Temperature  of  Berries  lohen  picked.  —  These  investigations  were  not 
storage  tests,  strictly  speaking,  but  as  their  results  bear  on  the  matter  of 
cooling  previous  to  storage  they  are  included  here. 

Air  temperatures  and  temperatures  taken  among  berries  in  crates  as 
soon  as  they  were  filled  by  pickers  were  recorded  by  Dr.  Stevens,  as  shown 
in  Table  6. 


196      MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    180. 


Table  6.  —  Temperatures  of  Cranberries  when  picked  compared  with  Air 

Temperatures. 


Boa  WHERE 

Temperatures 
were  taken. 

Date,  and 
Condition  of 
the  Weather 

when  the 

Temperatures 

were  taken. 

Variety  of 
Berries. 

Hour  of 

Day 
Tempera- 
tures were 
taken. 

Air 
Temper- 
ature in 
Shade. 

Temper- 
ature of 
Berries 
when 
picked 
(taken  at 
Center  of 
Picking 
Crate). 

Station, 

Oct.  3,  clear  and 

Howes,     . 

7.30  A.M. 

49°  F. 

49°  F. 

sunny. 

8.30  A.M. 

60°  F. 

62°  F, 

9.00  A.M. 

62°  F. 

64°  F. 

9.20  A.M. 

62°  F. 

68°  F. 

9.40  A.M. 

63°  F. 

75°  F. 

10.40  A.M. 

70°  F. 

79°  F. 

11.00  A.M. 

70°  F. 

79°  F. 

11.30  A.M. 

71°  F. 

81°  F. 

11.55  A.M. 

71°  F. 

81°  F. 

2.15  P.M. 

70°  F. 

75°  F. 

2.55  P.M. 

70°  F. 

74°  F. 

3.00  P.M. 

70°  F. 

73°  F. 

Station, 

Sept.   20,   bright 
sun. 

Early  Black,    . 

11.10  A.M. 

66°  F. 

81°  F. 

3.30  P.M. 

64°  F. 

70°  F. 

4.30  P.M. 

61°  F. 

65°  F. 

Station, 

Sept.   18,     . 

Early  Black,    . 

11.15  A.M. 

75°  F. 

84°  F. 

12.45  P.M. 

74°  F. 

85°  F. 

1.30  P.M. 

74°  F. 

82°  F. 

3  40  P.M. 

67°  F. 

72°  F. 

Station, 

Sept. -23,    . 

Early  Black,   . 

9.30  A.M. 

75°  F. 

80°  F. 

11.30  A.M. 

76°  F. 

87°  F. 

11.45  A.M. 

76°  F. 

89°  F. 

Old  Colony  bog.  South 
Dennis,  Mass. 

Sept.  22,    . 

Early  Black,   . 

11.30  A.M. 

73°  F. 

86°  F. 

11.45  A.M. 

73°  F. 

89°  F. 

3.00  P.M. 

73°  F. 

86°  F. 

KEPORT   OF   CRANBERRY   SUBSTATION   FOR    1916.       197 

These  records  show  that  under  ordinary  harvesting  conditions  cranber- 
ries attain  high  temperatures  on  the  vines.  It  has  been  found  that  with 
the  crate  containers  commonly  used  these  temperatures  do  not  change 
rapidly  unless  the  berries  are  placed  in  very  cool  storage  after  they  are 
picked. 

The  difference  between  the  temperature  of  the  air  and  that  of  the  ber- 
ries when  picked  is  greatest  when  the  sun  is  highest,  and  is  least  early  in 
the  morning  and  late  in  the  afternoon.  Tests  with  green  and  ripe  berries 
in  small  glass  containers  failed  to  show  any  appreciable  difference  between 
berries  of  different  colors. 

3.  Hand-'picking  v.  Scoop-picking  as  affecting  Keeping  Quality.  —  Two 
series  of  tests  come  under  this  head,  as  follows :  — 

(a)  Twelve  parallel  and  adjacent  strips  of  Early  Black  vines,  each  ap- 
proximately 50  feet  long  by  5^  feet  wide,  were  picked  in  alternation  with 
scoops  and  by  hand  on  September  18,  a  single  full  crate  being  obtained 
from  each  strip.  In  the  hand-picking,  each  man  was  allowed  to  follow  his 
own  method,  and  a  great  difference  was  observed  in  the  ways  in  which 
they  did  the  work,  some  tearing  the  berries  from  the  vines  with  their  fingers 
used  much  like  scoop-teeth,  and  some  picking  individual  berries  much  as 
strawberries  are  commonly  gathered.  Six  of  the  crates,  three  hand-picked 
and  three  scoop-picked,  were  placed  in  the  storage  room  at  once,  the  rest 
being  left  in  the  sun  on  the  bog  for  several  hours.  Test  No.  1  of  Table  7 
completes  the  record  of  these  tests. 

(6)  Twelve  crates  of  Howes  berries,  picked  by  hand  and  with  scoops 
in  alternation,  as  in  the  first  series  of  tests,  from  an  equal  number  of  nar- 
row parallel  and  adjacent  strips  of  vines,  were  handled  as  indicated  in  test 
No.  2,  of  Table  7. 

The  averages  of  the  table  show  that  the  scooped  berries  kept  slightly 
better  than  the  hand-picked  ones  in  both  series  of  tests.  All  this  fruit  was 
stored  as  it  came  from  the  bog  without  cleaning  in  any  way.  The  crates 
were  examined  by  the  "nine-sample"  method  in  determining  the  rot  per- 
centages. 


198       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    180. 


I 


I 


Pi. 

w 

^ 

g 

o 

o 

f^ 

bq 

■ri 

5^ 

s 

53 

a> 

C3> 

fa< 

^ 

§* 

g 

-« 

■4) 

!D 

r^ 

k 

ts 

e:) 

S> 

Oj 

5j 

ss 

s 

^ 

R' 

o 

^ 

e 

-< 

>^ 

^ 

^ 

^ 

Ct> 

-^ 

?; 

a 

^•, 

.^ 


CQ 


I 

I 


a 


JJ  O  (D 


>.s 


ii  bc o  <a  ':i  o  o  ^  a  Or, 


H    C    ^    O 


b  03  2 


'      2  =''S 


Htj-"  E  5j  a 

a)  fj  o  t^JS-S 


lol 


o  o 


"fls 


M  u 

•o.S 

■3,9 

13 '0< 


00  •-H 


b- OS  as  00  00  00      »0(Mcoi^gooo 

Cl  C<i  ^^  M  <M  Cq        CS  C<l  C^  C^  C^  C^ 


O   O   O    t>   I 


O    O   O   I 


POPOQQ  PPQPQQ 

oooooo  oo^o^p 

00  OO  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  CO  00 

O,  a  0<  0<  O.  O.  O.  0<  d  0<  Q.  0< 


pLi  C£<  piH  [:<  [z,  p:^      pLH  pL,  [is;,  p:<  l£<  pL( 

(MOOd^^-^        (MOO<M^^^^ 

oot^t^oooooo      oot^t^oooooo 


s  s  s  s  s  a    s  s  s  a  a  s 

OlOOOOO        W5l«0000 


Eq  fc,  pt(  fe  (i,  pt,       pii  plH  Cl,  pn  pq  pc< 

C^OOfM-^-^C^I         (MO0*MTt<»CCl 
00  It- t^  00  00  03        OOt^t^QOOOQO 


a  a  s  a  a  a    a  a  a  s  a  a 

CU  B<'  a.'  •<  <!  »;        ^  U  ^  <  -i.  B<' 
»0  O  »0  1/5  C3  »0        O  "O  lO  O  lO  O 


1-t  C<I  CO  **  »0  «0        *-IC^C0^W3O 


3        ij 


3        di 


lO  rt 


CO  t^oo  »-<  CO  r 


UOOUOU    UOC)UUU 


_o  00005 

CO  CO  CO  CO  CO  CO 


o^  ©2  o  o 

CO  CO  CO  CO  CO  CO 


fsHpLipLipiHpupq 

»-H  ^^  ■<**  CO  =0  Ift 


00  00  t~.  t~  t— t>.       OOOOt 


pn  pL,  li(  pt,  piH  pc< 
^^  ^  CO  :OeO»^ 


a  .  a  a  a  a 
«i  a  (C  fc  o<'  B<' 

oooooo 


a  .  a  a  a  a 

<i  a   b  p.*  CU  B^ 

oooooo 


pq  pL<  p£<  pL<  pE4  Pq 
1— (  •—<  ^  OS  OS  1/3 


pL,  p£|  pq  PlH  P^  pC( 

T-H  ^  coos  OS  CO 


a  a  a  a  s  a 

«!  <)■  ^  -i.  -itu 
10  »C  "^  o  »o  o 


a  a  a  s  a  a 

^  <j  a.'  <!  ^'  bh' 


•-H  cq  CO  ■*  in  CO     >-i  <m  co -^  "5  co 


3  *J 


REPORT   OF   CRANBERRY   SUBSTATION   FOR    1916.       199 

In  partial  confirmation  of  the  evidence  presented  above,  that  scoop- 
picking  is  not  especially  harmful  to  the  keeping  quahty  of  cranberries,  a 
recital  of  the  experience  with  14  bushel  crates  of  Early  Black  berries 
picked  with  scoops  in  two  different  ways  from  narrow  alternating  par- 
allel and  adjacent  strips  of  vines  is  here  included.  In  picking  seven  of 
these  crates  the  scoops  were  allowed  to  fill  to  a  considerable  extent  as  usual 
before  emptjang,  the  berries  churning  back  and  forth  as  they  accumulated. 
With  the  other  boxes  the  berries  were  not  allowed  to  collect  as  they  were 
picked,  but  were  poured  out  of  the  scoops  after  each  pull  through  the 
vines.  The  results  of  the  storage  of  this  fruit  are  shown  in  Table  8.  The 
churned  berries  kept  as  well  as  the  unchurned.  The  crates  were  examined 
by  the  "nine-sample"  method. 

Table  8.  —  Picking   Test.  —  The  Scoop-churning  of  Berries  during  the 
Process  of  Picking  does  not  m.aterially  affect  Keeping  Qualitij. 


Percent- 

age of 

Quan- 

Date ex- 

Rotten 

Date 

amined 

and 

How  Berries 

■WERE   SCOOPED. 

picked 
and 

tity 
stored 
(Bush- 
els). 

How  stored. 

to  de- 
termine 

Partly 
Rotten 

stored. 

Rot  Per- 

Berries 

centage. 

found  at 

End  of 

Test. 

With  churning, 

Oct.  8 

7 

Unseparated,  in  picking  crates,    . 

Dec.  19 

29.51 

Without  churning,    . 

Oct.  8 

7 

Unseparated,  in  picking  crates,    . 

Dec.  19 

29.64 

4.  Relative  Keeping  Quality  of  the  Upper  and  Under  Berries  of  the  Vi7ies. 
—  The  three  tests  to  determine  this  were  carried  out  as  indicated  by 
Table  9,  the  results  showing  rather  conclusively  that  the  berries  most 
exposed  to  sun  and  wind  during  their  gro-ni^h  are  considerably  better 
keepers  than  those  produced  under  the  protection  of  the  vines.  Moreover, 
the  top  berries  were  much  more  highly  colored  and  averaged  considerably 
larger  in  size  than  the  others  when  picked. 

These  berries  were  all  picked  by  hand  under  the  supervision  of  the 
writer,  who  did  much  of  the  work  himself.  They  were  stored  in  quart 
cans. 


200       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    180. 


Table  9.  —  Upper  and  Under  Berries  compared  as  to  Keeping  Quality. 


Percent- 

age of 

Quan- 

Rotten 

tity 

and 

Test 
No. 

Variety. 

Berries. 

Date 
picked. 

placed 

in 
Storage 

Test 
(Quarts). 

Period  of 
Storage  Test. 

Partly 
Rotten 
Berries 
found  at 
End  of 
Storage 
Test. 

Only  sound  upper 

Sept.  30 

6 

Sept.  30  to  Dec. 

2 

31.55 

1,    . 

Early  Black,    . 

berries. 
Only  sound  under 
berries. 

Sept.  30 

6 

Sept.  30  to  Dec. 

2 

38.83 

Only  sound  upper 

Oct.      6 

14 

Oct.     6  to  Nov. 

20 

28.74 

2.    . 

Early  Black,  .   | 

berries. 
Only  sound  under 
berries. 

Oct.     6 

12 

Oct.     6  to  Nov. 

21 

37.93 

•Only  sound  upper 

Oct.    13 

6 

Oct.    13  to  Dec. 

9 

15.49 

8,    . 

Howes,      .     .   < 

berries. 
Only  sound  under 
berries. 

Oct.    13 

6 

Oct.    13  to  Dec. 

9 

18.44 

It  seems  to  be  the  general  experience  with  Cape  Cod  bogs  that  late 
holding  of  the  winter-flowage  improves  the  keeping  quality  of  the  berries. 
As  the  writer  has  observed  that  late  holding  of  the  water  frequently  re- 
duces the  quantity  of  under  berries  as  compared  with  the  amount  of  fruit 
produced  in  the  tops  of  the  vines,  the  results  of  these  tests  may  partly 
explain  this  improvement.  They  also  suggest  that  the  generally  recog- 
nized good  comparative  keeping  quality  of  the  1916  crop  may  have  been 
due  largely  to  the  very  general  failure  of  the  under  berries  to  set  in  their 
usual  abundance. 

The  deeper  the  scoops  are  run  through  the  vines  in  picking,  the  greater 
the  proportion  of  under  berries  that  are  gathered  and  the  greater,  also, 
the  quantity  of  unattached  cranberry  leaves  and  sand  that  gets  mixed 
with  the  fruit.  On  account  of  the  inferior  keeping  quality  of  the  under 
berries  here  shown,  and  because  of  the  harm  done  by  admixtures  of  loose 
leaves  proved  by  tests  described  below  (No.  7;  page  206),  the  desirability 
of  closely  scooping  berries  that  are  to  be  stored  long  is  rendered  doubtful. 

5.  Housing  promptly  v.  Leaving  Crates  of  Berries  in  the  Sun  on  the  Bog, 
as  affecting  Cranberry  Keeping.  —  Eight  series  of  tests  were  carried  out  in 
this  connection,  four  with  Early  Black  and  four  with  Howes  fruit.  Four 
of  these  were  conducted  in  connection  with  the  picking  experiments 
described  above  (No.  3,  page  197),  Table  7  showing  their  arrangement 
and  results.  Dr.  Stevens  took  all  the  temperatures  given  in  this  table 
with  chemical  thermometers,  their  bulbs  being  plunged  to  the  centers  of 
the  crates.  At  8  a.m.,  September  19,  the  temperatures  of  the  twelve  boxes 
of  Early  Black  berries  ranged  from  68°  to  70°  F.,  and  at  8  a.m.,  September 
20,  they  ranged  from  61°  to  62°,  from  which  there  was  little  change  for 
several  days  after. 


REPORT   OF   CRANBERRY   SUBSTATION   FOR    1916.      201 

The  records  in  Table  7  show  that  as  a  rule  the  temperature  of  berries 
left  in  crates  on  the  bog  exposed  to  the  sun  for  several  hours  did  not  change 
more  than  3  degrees.  The  temperatures  of  some  of  these  crates  were  taken 
every  thirty  minutes  from  the  time  they  were  picked  until  they  were 
housed,  almost  no  variation  being  discovered  until  very  near  the  latter 
time.  The  averages  of  percentages  given  in  the  table  indicate  that  the 
Early  Black  berries  housed  at  once  kept  somewhat  better  than  those  left 
on  the  bog,  whereas  these  results  with  the  Howes  fruit  were  reversed.  This 
difference  in  the  storage  of  the  two  varieties  corresponded  with  the  differ- 
ence in  the  average  temperatures  of  the  different  lots  when  housed,  the 
Early  Black  berries  housed  at  once  averaging  to  have  lower  temperatures 
when  placed  in  storage  than  did  those  left  on  the  bog,  whereas  the  Howes 
fruit  housed  at  once  had  a  somewhat  higher  average  temperature  when 
stored  than  did  that  left  on  the  bog. 

The  four  other  experiments  under  this  head  were  carried  out  in  connec- 
tion vnth  some  of  the  tests  of  the  effect  of  wetness  on  cranberry  keeping 
described  below  (No.  6  (a),  page  201),  Table  10  exhibiting  their  arrange- 
ment and  results.  As  in  the  first  four  series  of  tests,  Dr.  Stevens  took  all 
the  temperatures  with  chemical  thermometers  at  the  centers  of  the  crates. 
It  was  partly  cloudy  all  day  the  day  that  the  Early  Black  berries  used  in 
these  tests  were  picked.  The  averages  of  percentages  in  the  table  show 
that  with  both  varieties  the  wet  berries  kept  better  after  having  been  left 
on  the  bog,  whereas  the  dry  ones  kept  better  when  housed  at  once. 

On  the  whole,  the  results  of  these  tests  were  inconclusive,  though  they 
failed  to  show  much  harm  to  the  keeping  quality  resulting  from  leaving 
the  crated  fruit  on  the  bog  for  several  hours  under  ordinary  harvesting  and 
storage  conditions. 

6.  Wet  and  Dry  Cranberries  compared  as  to  Keeping.  —  Three  series  of 
tests  come  under  this  head,  as  follows :  — 

(a)  An  area  60  feet  square  laid  out  on  Early  Black  vines  on  the  station 
bog  was  divided  into  equal  parts  by  lines  running  diagonally  between  the 
corners.  Two  of  the  opposite  triangles  thus  formed  were  scooped  while  the 
berries  were  wet  with  dew,  the  other  two  being  left  until  they  were  dry. 
The  ways  in  which  these  berries  were  tested  and  the  results  obtained  are 
shown  in  test  No.  1  of  Table  10. 

(6)  An  area  100  by  30  feet  laid  out  on  Howes  vines  on  the  station  bog 
was  divided  into  triangles  by  diagonal  lines  between  the  corners.  Two 
opposite  triangles  were  picked  with  scoops  while  the  vines  were  more  or 
less  wet  with  dew,  and  the  other  two  when  they  were  dry.  The  manner  of 
testing  this  fruit  and  the  results  obtained  with  it  are  shown  in  test  No.  2 
of  Table  10. 


202       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    180. 


O 


g 
S 
^ 


oq 


'TS      > 


^ 

^ 


M 
O 
H 


H  S  &  O 


, i§    .ace 

O    g   O   tl-^   « 


oQ.2 
W     ft 


.31 


53 


O  "^  »0  C<|  Tf  eo  Csl  eo  e»5  eo  CO -H 

f— CO  00 -.J*  lO  00  00  CO  CO  ;0  C^  CO 

CD  r^  »0  t^ -^  *0  CO  »0  i^  ^H  <M  CO 

COCOCOCOCOCO  t-iC^MC^O^C^I 


3  CD  iO  CO  CD  CO 


o  o  c  o  u  o 


o  «  o  o  o 


o  o  o  o  o  p 
oooooo 


o  o  o  o  o  o 
,  _      oooooo 

I  C^         C^  C^  O  Csl  C^  <M 


a  o.  o.  o.  D.  fie 

a)  fl>  o  0  ©  QJ 


MMtOMtCCC 


pL|  [il  t^  pLi  {J:4  PM         fL,  EL4  pLH  (;^  [i^  [x, 

C<1C<JCO(M(MCO        ^-^H  —  OiOCS 
CO  CD  CO  CO  CO  CO        00  C>0  00  t^  t^  t^ 


s  s  s  s  s  s 

<!  <!  y  s<"  cC  pi 

lO  ^'^  *A  o  o  o 


S  S  S  »  g  g 

-<  -d  -<  c  g  Q 


-^---i!<-i; 


h  pM  (^  (^  f>H  p:-(  fiihf^f^fl^f^ 

CD  CO  CD  »0  lO  CO  00  00  00  00  00  00 

g  S  S  S  S  S  S  S  g  s  s  s 

10»0<3000  OcriOCiOO 

-H  —  coocseo  coeocococoeo 

oooooo  -^-irt— ;,-;-^ 


.-<  C<I  CO  ■»*<  »0  CO        ^HC^COTt<l«CO 


o 

lO 

CO 

e-> 

§ 

OS 

S5 

•o 

U5 

=! 

=5 

CO 

t^  00  oo  CO  ^^  CO 

■*COCOCDOO 

oo  CO  Tt<  **  c<»  o      II 

CO  ^  b—  Oi  CO  CO 

0(M 

—  OK5U5 

•*>0«OlfflcOU5 

«0 -*  U5  CO  U5  •<< 

«„„„„«     II 

O  O  t)  o  o  o 

CJ    Q    O'    A)    O    CJ 

QPQPPQ 

oooooo 

<v  0^  o  a;  o  o 
QQQQQQ 

23S5 

o  o 

55 

5552 

CO  CO  CO  CO  CO  CO 

CO  CO  CO  CO  CO  CO 

o  o  t>  o  o  o 

oooooo 

oooooo 

faPLn'liH'fefeP^' 

pLipLipLip^'p^'pli 

Oi  CO  CO  CO  CO  CO 
coco  CO  t^  t^  t^ 

t~  t^  Ir- 1^  t~  «-- 

s  s  s  s  s  a 

s  s  a  a  s  a 

■<•<:•«!  ft. 

0.  ft. 

-!  <: 

-<  0.   ft.  ft. 

OlCIrt  OO  o 
CO  — -"OOO 

oooooo 
oooooo 

S) 

O  0  05^^'^ 

OOO'*  •*■>»" 

.... 

•S 

pL|  fe  fe  tH  pH  pL, 

p=;p:;cL,cnc:,ct,  II 

^ 

O  CO  CO  00  CD  rt* 

r^l:^I>.t^ 

Qi 

- 

s  s  s  s  a  s 

a  a  a  a  a  a    1 1 

■«;-<!■«;•« 

■<  < 

<  < 

<<<< 

X5000IOO 
C-1  O  O  C<1  —  o 

s§s§§g 

Od  C^  03  ^  OS  o^ 

ooooo — , 

'« 

^ 

-H  eq  CO  ■>*<  W5  CO 

-H«co-*>oeo 

■        II 

a 
o 

"S 

o 

o 

a 
o 

.2 

o 

o 

3 

o 

a 

o 

2 

1  1 

1 

Q 

CO 

CO 

d 

Q 

CO 

o 

1 

1 

REPORT   OF    CRANBERRY    SUBSTATION   FOR    1916.      203 

The  averages  of  percentages  in  the  table  show  that  the  berries  stored 
wet  rotted  more  than  those  stored  dry  in  both  series  of  tests.  The  wet 
berries  in  the  second  series  were  more  nearly  dry  when  picked  than  were 
those  of  the  &st  series,  this  apparently  accounting  for  the  smaller  differ- 
ence in  the  average  amounts  of  rot  that  developed  in  the  two  lots  of  Howes 
fruit.  The  wet  berries  left  on  the  bog  were  perhaps  dried  a  good  deal,  as 
compared  with  those  housed  at  once,  by  the  high  temperatures  and  free 
circulation  of  the  open  air,  this  perhaps  explaining  their  better  keeping. 

All  the  berries  in  these  tests  were  stored  in  bushel  picking  crates  as  they 
came  from  the  bog,  without  cleaning  in  any  way.  Their  rot  percentages 
W'ere  determined  by  the  "nine-sample"  method. 

(c)  The  two  tests  in  the  third  series  are  fully  explained  by  Table  11. 
The  wet  berries  in  these  tests  were  considerably  wetter  than  those  in  either 
of  the  first  two  series,  the  moisture  being  that  of  a  very  heavy  dew.  All 
the  crates  were  stored  as  soon  as  the  berries  were  picked.  The  tempera- 
tures given  in  the  table  were  taken  by  the  WTiter  when  the  fruit  was 
housed,  chemical  thermometers  being  plunged  to  the  centers  of  the  crates. 
When  the  four  crates  picked  on  October  4  were  stored,  the  temperature  of 
those  picked  the  night  before  was  50°  F.  The  temperatures  of  the  wet 
and  dry  picked  berries  did  not  become  equalized  in  storage  until  some 
time  during  the  night  of  October  6  and  7. 

All  this  fruit  was  stored  without  cleaning.  The  crates  were  examined 
by  the  "nine-sample"  method. 


204       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    180. 


O 


^ 
Cq 


1  aci?     ^    . 

Percental 

of  Rotte 

and  Part 

Rotten 

Berries 

found  a 

End  of 

Storage 

Test. 

00 
CO 

Si' 

r^ 

■^ 

s 

*. 

CO 

CO 

to 

to 

bO 

c3 

k4 

d 

« 

ej 

_o 

o 

Q 

o 

co«- 

Q 

Q 

Q 

Q 

is 

0 

p 

o 

o 

-4^ 

« 

•«»< 

eo 

■* 

.2 

o 

O 

o 

O 

O 

T3 

o 

to 

(D 

u 

o 

(U 

ffi 

O 

o 

^ 

"S 

03 

"S 

"S 

CO 

t4 

Lh 

U 

O 

u 

o 

u 

o 

60 

M 

M 

tc 

C 

fl 

C 

.5 

/3 

13 

!5 

3 

o 

o 

o 

'3. 

'o. 

'S. 

'S 

13 

a 

c 

e 

t-i 

'"' 

HH 

a  "o  .1^  -fl   • 

3>.2§^ 

cq 

N 

M 

e<i 

aisfeM'" 

mper- 
are  at 
'hich 
eked. 

CO 

00 

eS^^-5. 

« 

t^ 

CO 

>> 

o 

s 

>. 

1-1 

p 

b 

Q 

o 

(U 

> 

> 

•6 

■d 

■d 

-d 

o 

o 

s> 

o 

p. 

a 

0. 

a 

8 

s 

CO 

m 

CO 

^ 

S 

S 

s 

S 

Q-d 

b 

Cl, 

p<' 

b 

<«  <u 

o 

,_t 

o 

,.^ 

o-?. 

t-.2 
2  i^i" 

2 

5 

2 

5 

o 

o 

c^ 

C5 

c^ 

X 

""* 

•'^ 

3'S 

M 

•«J< 

CO 

•* 

cS.« 

0-1 

O 

o 

o 

O 

o 

o 

o 

H 

H 

» 

K 

. 

. 

■< 

^ 

^ 

> 

§ 

J 

5 

S 

. 

. 

_>> 

>> 

s 

s 

'II 

T^ 

s 

» 

e3 

C3 

o 

o 

w 

w 

w 

w 

M 

-< 

p?" 

< 

-3j 

m 

n 

^ 

H^l 

" 

(M 

REPORT   OF    CRANBERRY   SUBSTATION   FOR    1916.      205 


Percentage 

of  Rotten 

and  Partly 

Rotten 

Berries 

found  at 

End  of 

Storage 

Test. 

■^         IM 

o 

S      o 
aj      00 

t^ 

— 1       o 

eo 

s 

■* 

eo 

to 

e«j      o 
CO      eo 

o> 

U5 

- 

o     o 

oo 

lO 

OS 

o 

T3 

s 

3 

73* 

tJ     ~ 

tJ 

IS 

a 
.2 

s  1 

s 

1     8 

o 

£ 

i 

1  ^ 

s 

1     ^ 

> 
? 

> 

% 

O       IS 

<D 

^          <D 

OJ 

5        ffl 

_ffl 

o 

'■B 

c3 

a        — ' 

C8       -=• 

*-■        -, 

t-< 

t^ 

a 

§    f 

CO        cS 

o 

S    "o 

o 

1      o 

>     -a 

o 

o 

6 

c 

c 

"g 

"e8 

i 

"          § 

_^ 

S,      ft 

ft 

i? 

.1 

ft 
ft 

CO 

_>; 

t 

03        m 

"d 
o 

1  1 

"5 
o 

> 

t.1 

"3 
o 

a 

© 

<£ 

OT 

(U 

CO 

o 

m 

•s  .a 

a     > 

.g 
1 

a      a 

i 

■ffl 
a 

1 

a 

i 

J3      M 

M 

J3      43 

_d 

J3 

:S     5 

ja 

ja 

^ 

.^ 

g      g 

g 

g      ^ 

g 

■^ 

g     g 

g 

^ 

■^ 

g 

Quan- 
tity of 
Fruit 
placed 

in 
Storage 
(Bush- 
els). 

^        tX 

eo 

eo      eo 

eo 

eo 

eo      eo 

^ 

•   eo 

eo 

eo 

d 
2 

-H          N 

M 

o      eo 

■* 

M 

eq      eo 

•* 

^ 

« 

eo 

o 

hJ 

.^ ^^ , 



. 

, 

. 



*P 

3 

02 

oo 

oo 

ea 

00 

O 

§ 

§ 

g 

-§ 

Q 

p 

Q 

Q 

1 

5 

s 

5 

S 

Pli 

ft 
o 

OS 

CO 

us 

1 

O 

o 

CB 

u: 

t^ 

(M 

Q  «  fe  2 

ft 

(U 

CO 

1 

1 

1 

C) 

» 

H 

m 

H 

e> 

a 

M 

tf 

« 

§ 

g 

s 

5 

i 

03 

IH 

>> 

>> 

<J) 

1 

o 

|l 

e<r 

eo 

■* 

.S  J3 

<D     ® 

ri     n     W 


-s  a  a 


£    S    d 


b  <=" 


JJ    <»    d  "£ 

T?     iv^     S     2 


'ii 


206       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    180. 

The  table  shows  that  the  results  of  this  test  stronglj^  confirmed  those 
of  the  first  two,  giving  striking  evidence  of  the  harmful  effect  of  excessive 
moisture  among  cranberries  in  storage. 

7.  Effects  of  Admixtures  of  Vines  and  Leaves  on  Cranberry  Keeping.  — 
The  four  series  of  tests  in  this  connection  were  carried  out  as  show^n  in 
Table  12.  The  fruit  was  picked  with  scoops  and  was  stored  in  bushel 
picking  crates.    The  crates  were  examined  by  the  "nine-sample"  method. 

The  table  shows  that  these  tests  gave  convincing  evidence  of  the  harm- 
ful effect  of  an  admixture  of  unattached  cranberry  leaves  in  the  storage  of 
the  fruit.  They  also  indicated  that  the  berries  keep  as  well  with  the  ad- 
mixture of  vines  and  leaves  attached,  commonly  obtained  in  scooping, 
as  any  way.  The  entire  removal  of  the  vines  and  leaves,  aside  from  the 
injury  done  in  the  process,  however,  seems  to  do  no  harm. 

8.  Berries  separated  with  Hay  den  and  with  White  Machines  and  Berries 
screened  xvithoxd  separating  compared  as  to  Keeping  Quality.  —  The  berries 
used  in  these  two  series  of  tests  were  handled  throughout  in  the  same  way. 
The  three  lots  of  fruit  in  each  series  came  from  the  same  source,  individual 
crates  of  berries  as  they  came  from  the  bog  being  divided  as  evenly  as  pos- 
sible into  three  separate  parts  by  successive  pourings  into  barrels  to  pro- 
duce them,  care  being  taken  to  handle  the  berries  of  the  different  lots  as 
nearly  alike  as  possible.  As  there  was  no  White  separator  in  working 
order  in  East  Wareham  at  the  time,  all  this  fruit  was  carted  in  open  barrels 
in  a  farm  wagon  (without  springs)  to  the  Makepeace  screenhouse  at 
Wareham,  two  of  the  lots  of  each  series  being  there  run  through  Hayden 
and  White  separators,  respectively.  The  berries  were  received  into  barrels 
from  both  the  Hayden  and  the  White  machines,  those  of  the  fii'st  box  (the 
"good"  box)  also  being  used  in  the  test  in  the  case  of  the  former.  The 
berries  of  all  the  lots  were  carted  back  in  the  open  barrels  to  the  station 
screenhouse,  where  they  were  hand-screened,  the  fruit  in  all  cases  being 
received  into  picking  crates  placed  close  to  the  mouths  of  the  screens  and 
being  stored  in  those  crates.  The  arrangement  and  results  of  these  tests 
are  shown  in  Table  13.  The  "nine-sample"  method  was  used  in  examining 
the  crates. 


REPORT   OF    CRANBERRY    SUBSTATION   FOR    1016.       207 


Is^c^-a 

■2  :g  b  S  CO  o  M^- 

■>j« 

o 

CO 

U5 

■* 

m 

IN 

eo 

^ 

05 

<n 

^ 

^ 

e 

I 

^ 

a> 

e 

0 

s. 

a 

C<2 

!»>■ 

-S 

0)   hi) 

si 

a 

C3 

c^ 

C) 

c^ 

C^ 

c^ 

S 

T3 

T! 

T) 

T! 

T3 

(< 

a 

(3 

a 

C 

13 

<i> 

0) 

c4 

C8 

c3 

c3 

03 

^ 

p 

cq* 

g 

O 

g 

O 

o 

^ 

6 

5J 

o 

cj 

o 

6 

i^ 

o 

a) 

o 

V 

Q 

P 

p 

p 

p 

P 

' 

TS 

CO 

!0 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

«  a) 

cq 

■4^ 

(M 

<M 

<N 

a 

T^ 

Q| 

o 

o 

o 

O 

o 

"c 

O 

O 

O 

O 

o 

O 

s~ 

(D 

e 

A 

"5 

lO 

«5 

•o 

^ 

a>   1  T3 

cq 

c< 

^ 

§t| 

1 

^ 

_^J 

1 

^ 

^• 

O 

u 

u 

o 

5^ 

C3 

O 

O 

o 

O 

•c^ 

jS 

C3 

« 

CO 

. 

^ 

.^ 

-a 

TS 

0) 

Qi 

j^ 

g 

T) 

a 

■B 

« 

V 

01 

2 

u 

|3 
(1> 

1 

-i 

£ 

a) 

V 

a 

a 

fl 

r  -> 

03 

cj 

-o 

03 

T3 

"3 

J3 

a 

03 

-a 

a 

03 

o 

o 

1 
o 

O 

a 

03 

>> 
o 

c 

03 
O 

T) 

t4 

^ 

g 

1 

oi 
t 

2 

•2 

a 

o 
g 

03 

2 

a 

m 

ft 

§* 

M 

0) 

o 

1 

S 

.■§ 

•o 

13 

.■§ 

^ 

03 

03 

2 

3 

OS 

<» 

^ 

W 

W 

^ 

W 

W 

^ 

•2 

,^  .a»    . 

;si 

■* 

■* 

■* 

■* 

■* 

•* 

>— 1 

CO 

H 

n 

11 

H 

K 
•< 
> 

i 

o 

1 

208       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    180. 

The  figures  of  the  table  indicate  that,  in  both  tests,  the  White  machine 
apparently  affected  the  keeping  qualities  of  the  fruit  about  the  same  as  did 
the  Hayden.  This  result  is  surprising,  and  must  be  verified  by  future 
experiments.  The  difference  in  the  tendency  to  rot  between  the  separated 
and  unseparated  berries  was  not  as  great  as  in  last  year's  tests.  This  may 
have  been  partly  due  to  the  injury  that  all  the  lots  of  fruit  probably  re- 
ceived in  the  carting,  this  perhaps  partly  hiding  the  real  difference  in  the 
damage  done  by  the  various  methods  of  cleaning. 

9.  The  Injury  to  the  Keeping  Quality  of  Cranberries  caused  by  Separators 
employing  the  Bouncing  Principle  and  by  the  Drop  in  the  Barrel.  —  That 
this  varies  greatly  with  different  lots  of  berries  was  indicated  by  the  results 
of  half  a  dozen  minor  experiments  conducted  by  Dr.  Stevens.  The  range 
in  the  increase  of  decay  caused  by  these  factors  in  these  tests  was  from 
about  14  to  about  127  per  cent. 

A  new  arrangement  devised  bj'-  the  writer  for  preventing  the  barrel  in- 
jury, for  use  both  in  screening  and  in  connection  -with  separators,  works 
well  mechanically  and  promises  to  be  generally  satisfactory,  though  no 
storage  tests  have  been  conducted  to  determine  the  degree  of  its  effective- 
ness. This  device  is  on  exhibition  at  the  offices  of  the  New  England  Cran- 
berry Sales  Company,  Middleborough,  Mass.,  and  the  J.  J.  Beaton 
Growers'  Agency,  Wareham,  Mass.,  and  it  also  may  be  seen  at  the  station 
screenhouse  at  East  Wareham  at  any  time  during  the  cranberry  season. 

10.  The  Effect  of  Grading  on  the  Keeping  of  Cranberries.  —  The  two  fol- 
lowing series  of  tests  come  under  this  head :  — 

(a)  Two  lots  of  Early  Black  berries  picked  in  the  same  location  on  the 
station  bog  were  treated  as  shown  in  Table  14.  To  make  sure  of  their 
being  well  cleaned  they  were  run  through  a  Hayden  separator  twice  imme- 
diatel}^  before  they  were  stored.  Onlj^  the  berries  going  into  the  separator 
barrels  were  used  in  the  test.  Neither  lot  was  hand-screened.  They  were 
stored  in  bushel  picking  crates  of  the  same  dimensions  and  construction. 
The  Hayden  grader  was  used.  A  board  was  in  the  grader  frame  in  place 
of  the  grader  while  the  second  lot  was  run  through.  The  spacing  of  the 
grader,  fourteen  thirty-seconds  of  an  inch,  was  wider  than  that  commonly 
used,  and  it  took  out  from  a  fifth  to  a  quarter  of  the  entire  quantity  of 
berries  put  through  the  separator  while  it  was  in  use. 


REPORT   OF   CRANBERRY    SUBSTATION   FOR    1916.      209 


©  0  «  S  o  a> 

&C3  o  o_:h 

C5 

uo 

to 

IM 

;s 

f^   (S«   ^ 

o^ 

•^  o    . 

O  g^   M 

2S-2  a 

"a 

"a 

■^ 

S  S  * 

£ 

g 

C3 
i 

e 

W"0 

£3 

c 

z 

2 

^ 

^ 

^§s°^ 

m 

00 

Nlll 

■* 

N 

s> 

;:^ 

s 

1 

^aoWS 

s 

O        w 

.^ 

CO 

03 

f^ 

r* 

,-'*^ 

bO 

N 

N 

E~H 

§^ 

;h 

6 

d 

o 

a> 

IS 

."H 

Q 

Q 

2' 

o 

o 

o 

cC 

-1^ 

<N 

cc 

•^ 

'C 

^ 

o 

O 

o 

(» 

fO 

s 

.4^ 

^ 

CO 

CO 

"^ 

§ffl§g§ 

cs 

c?o  ftSB 

?; 

02 

*C-i 

fl. 

o1^ 

.S  !r<ja 
S  ^  o 

k 
g 

Zti 

1 

o 

ftgC 

C35 

5- 

^ 

o 

"5^ 

o 

-a 

I5J 

& 

C3 

1    ■ 

0) 

13 
73 

In 
tD 

1— ( 

J3 

03 

1 

H 

^ 

fe 

m 

•s-^ 

^ 

^ 

< 

31 

:2; 

" 

N 

H 

"Sj3  O 

-^ 

-^ 

a^^ 

c^ 

-2^ 

C) 

P^l 

o 

o-o 

« 

ji  o 

C3^ 

_^ 

«•! 

o 
O 

210       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    180. 

The  figures  of  the  table  show  that  the  closely  graded  berries  kept  con- 
siderably better  than  the  ungraded  ones,  there  being  nearly  22  per  cent, 
more  rot  among  the  latter  at  the  close  of  the  test.  The  cup-counts  were 
taken  with  the  inspectors'  cup  of  the  New  England  Cranberry  Sales  Com- 
pany. 

(b)  Two  lots  of  Howes  berries  were  obtained  for  this  series  of  tests  by 
dividing  boxes  of  fruit,  just  as  they  had  been  stored  when  they  came  from 
the  bog  on  October  7,  into  equal  parts  by  alternate  dippings  with  a  quart 
measure.  They  were  put  through  a  Hayden  separator,  with  the  upper  set 
of  bounce-boards  set  at  the  middle  notch,  on  December  26.  A  board  five- 
eighths  of  an  inch  thick  was  kept  in  the  grader  frame  in  place  of  the  grader 
while  the  second  lot  was  run  through.  The  grader  took  out  about  a  quarter 
of  the  quantity  of  berries  separated  while  it  was  in  use.  Only  the  berries 
that  went  into  the  barrels  from  the  separator  were  used.  They  were  poured 
from  the  barrels  into  boxes  and  were  taken  into  the  warm  screening  room 
a  box  at  a  time,  so  that  they  might  undergo  a  high  temperature  no  longer 
than  necessary  during  the  screening.  Both  lots  were  carefully  screened  at 
the  same  time  on  December  29,  the  berries  being  run  into  picking  crates 
placed  close  to  the  mouths  of  the  screens.  They  were  carefully  shaken 
down  and  stored  in  these  crates  at  once.  The  arrangement  and  results  of 
these  tests  are  shown  by  Table  15. 

It  will  be  seen  that  after  a  winter  storage  of  nearly  ten  weeks  almost  32 
per  cent,  more  berries  showed  rot  among  the  ungraded  fruit  than  among 
that  which  had  been  closely  graded.  At  no  time  during  the  test  did  the 
temperature  of  the  storage  room  range  more  than  8°  above  the  freezing 
point  of  water,  and  for  considerable  periods  it  ran  more  or  less  below  it. 
The  cup-counts  given  in  the  table  were  taken,  as  in  the  first  series  of  tests, 
with  the  Sales  Company's  cup. 

While  it  cannot  safely  be  said  that  the  results  of  these  tests  prove  that 
grading  improves  the  keeping  of  cranberries,  they  bring  out  a  point  of 
much  importance.  Closely  graded  berries,  being  larger  and  more  uniform 
in  size,  are  much  more  desirable  in  appearance  than  ungraded  ones.  If 
they  also  keep  better,  the  advisability  of  preparing  them  for  market  in  this 
way  as  a  means  of  inducing  greater  consumption  is  much  confirmed.  If 
close  grading  were  generally  practiced  it  could  be  made  a  powerful  factor 
in  properly  controlling  the  cranberry  market,  for,  while  it  tended  strongly 
to  increase  consumption  on  one  hand,  it  would  in  a  sense  cut  down 
production  on  the  other.  In  the  writer's  opinion  it  would  be  the  best  possi- 
ble means  for  dealing  with  overproduction,  for  if  any  part  of  a  crop  had  to 
be  throwTi  away  it  would  be  only  the  berries  of  inferior  size  or  qua]it3\ 

The  results  of  these  grading  tests  are  entirely  in  line  with  last  year's 
findings  of  the  writer,  in  the  study  of  ventilation  as  affecting  cranberry 
keeping,  and  with  those  brought  out  by  Dr.  Shear  and  his  collaborators 
in  their  paper  published  as  a  part  of  this  bulletin.  The  small  berries  as 
well  as  the  leaves,  conclusive  experiments  with  which  are  described  above 
(No.  7,  page  206),  might  be  expected  to  check  ventilation,  not  only  by 


REPORT   OF   CRANBERRY   SUBSTATION   FOR    1916.      211 


CO 


^ 


5ti 


< 


Percentage 

of  Rotten 

and  Partly 

Rotten 

Berries 

found  at 

End  of 

Storage  Test. 

22.0 
17.6 
20.2 
21.9 

20.41 

27.0 
33.2 
26.5 
24.8 
23  0 

o 

Average 
Cup-count 
of  Berries 

at  End 

of  Storage 

Test. 

95.3 
96.7 
95.0 
97.1 

96.0' 

04.9 
06.6 
03.6 
08.1 
06  3 

"5 

J5 

— i(Mco-a<                    .-is^ioo-*"? 

Method  of 
Examination  to 

determine 
Rot  Percentage. 

Seven-sample, 
Seven-sample, 

H 

a 
s 
s 

"o 

T3 

.9 

'u 

Dec.  29  to  Mar.  7, 
Dec.  29  to  Mar.  7, 

Quantity 
of  Berries 
placed  in 
Storage  Test 
(Bushels). 

•*                                                          U9 

"i 
o  . 

'S 

J3 
.S 

1 

Whether  graded 

OR  NOT. 

Graded, 
Not  graded,  . 

o  ° 

- 

C'j' 

212       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    180. 

mechanically  reducing  the  spaces  for  the  passage  of  air  and  gases  among 
the  fruit,  but  also  by  themselves  using  up  oxygen  and  giving  off  additional 
carbon  dioxide,  in  this  way  being  especially  harmful. 

11.  The  Relative  Effect  of  Barrel  and  Crate  Containers  on  Cranberry 
Keeping  in  Shipments.  —  Three  lots  of  Early  Black  and  two  lots  of  Howes 
berries,  each  lot  consisting  of  a  barrel  and  two  half-barrel  crates,  made  up 
an  experimental  shipment  to  determine  this.  All  the  berries  of  each  lot 
came  from  the  same  place  on  the  station  bog,  the  different  lots  being 
picked  in  various  locations,  the  Early  Black  on  October  2  and  the  Howes 
on  October  5.  All  five  lots  were  run  through  a  Hayden  separator  and 
screened  on  November  7.  On  account  of  difficulties  encountered  in  ar- 
ranging for  shipping  this  fruit  with  other  berries  in  a  carload,  it  was  then 
kept  in  open  barrels,  all  of  which  were  nearly  full,  until  November  17, 
when  it  was  packed  for  shipment.  The  berries  shipped  in  barrels  were 
packed  in  the  usual  way,  whUe  the  crated  fruit  was  placed  in  4-quart 
baskets  like  those  used  as  containers  for  strawberries.^  All  the  lots  were 
left  in  the  packed  condition  in  a  cold  room  until  November  20,  when  they 
were  carted  in  a  farm  wagon  (without  springs)  from  East  Wareham  to 
Tremont  Station.  They  were  kept  in  the  railroad  freight-house  over  night 
and  placed  in  different  parts  of  a  car  on  top  of  a  carload  of  other  berries 
the  next  morning.  The  car  left  Tremont  November  21  and  arrived  in 
Washington,  D.  C,  on  Saturday,  November  25.  They  were  there  left  in 
the  freight-house  until  the  folloAving  Monday  morning.  They  were  then 
taken  to  Arlington  Farm  and  stored  at  a  temperature  of  about  50°  F, 
until  December  9.  The  barrels  and  crates  were  opened  and  stored  in  a 
laboratory,  the  temperature  of  which  varied  from  60°  to  85°  F.,  from 
Decem.ber  9  until  December  14  and  15,  when  they  were  sampled  and 
examined,  as  follows:  — 

(a)  The  eight  following  samples  were  taken  from  each  barrel:  — 

Nos.  1  and  2,  two  quarts  near  the  top,  just  below  the  layer  crushed  in 
heading,  —  distinguished  in  Table  16  by  the  word  "top." 

No.  3,  one  quart  taken  a  quarter  of  the  distance  down  from  the  top,  — 
indicated  by  "J". 

Nos.  4  and  5,  two  quarts  taken  near  the  middle,  — marked  "V'- 

No.  6,  one  quart  taken  from  three-quarters  of  the  distance  from  the  top 
toward  the  bottom,  —  designated  as  "f  ". 

Nos.  7  and  8,  two  quarts  from  near  the  bottom,  —  distinguished  as 
"bottom." 

The  berries  were  dipped  out  of  the  barrels  down  to  the  parts  sampled, 
the  samples  being  taken  from  all  parts  of  the  surface  of  the  fruit  exposed  by 
the  dipping,  except  within  2  inches  of  the  staves. 

(6)  Four  1-quart  samples  were  taken  from  each  crate  of  each  lot  at 
various  places  in  the  crate,  so  as  to  make  up  as  fair  an  average  as  possible, 
each  sample  representing  different  baskets. 

•  The  crates  and  baskets  were  furnished  through  the  courtesy  of  Mr.  J.  J.  Beaton  of  Wareham, 
Mass. 


REPORT   OF   CRANBERRY   SUBSTATION   FOR    1916.      213 


,  .„  a     >,  a  jj 


I  «M  a       >i  a  ^  a>  03 

>  S5  oJ  «3  q  S  c  s 


>7  S  o  S  a  9 


OS  -<**  lo  o  od  oo  od  c<i 

^  C<»  ^  ^  T-i  f-t  ^  c* 


osc4oooooicao5i^ 


r*cocO'-<ooooo5 

C0CO-^-^T*<  •<**-.}<  CO 


OSCOOf-tcDOMO 


r^03C«ow3Tt<ooc« 
cccocDco^cocor* 


t^coos^ 


►^  ?^  "^  =3  03  q  S  fl  S 


t^  s  o  o  fl  g 


c<iGMc^e^eoc^«c^ 


■<  CO  OS  t^  CO  lO  O  CO 

3  00  (M  O  lO  (M  .-I  ^ 


i-iOit--OiC^CO'^C^ 
(MtMOOt^-^ifCOOOS 

cocococococo-^co 


Cq»H«i*<^t^O0NCO 
0»OiOON»-HCO-^ 


COTf^OCOOOCqOlt^ 
*OOOt-»O^COCDt>- 


cot>.»-ir-.coco»02J 


,  .^  a      >i  c3  s° 


^^p-      PUP5PQ.S* 


»5  ®  o  S  ci  « 


^HiftCOOOO^H^CO 


-<t<OCSCDC<lOii-ioo 

Mco-^coco-^-^co 


C^C^CqcOCOC^iMC^ 


-HMC<HOOO<OC*<iO 
COt^i-"Ot^f*COO 


^H  -^  ^H   !>-.  .-H  ^- O  "^  O 

T-H  CO  <M  CO  Oi  CO  "(J*  »0  lO 


GOeoosiOcoc^'^uti 
oso>GOicr^ooc^c« 
cococ^cococ^coco 


OcO»OOI^'^t^Oi 

co-^ocooi^oios 
co-^-^-^co^coco 


ao5T3:35-n|o. 


3  t-  3  E:-^  d 

►7  S  o  oj  d  S 


^-oco■*J*c<^coM<c^ 
■<*J«Dcococo'c2o6co 


lO'^-HOtCb-cDOS 

oc^i--<aicoco«-»o 


U^G0Ot^03C0t>-00 
OOOS-^OSOtM'l^eO 

cococococococcco 


OS  CO  ^Hosoo  cocoes 

Csj^^^.4cO'-hO> 

6*5  coco  cow  cocoes 


(M-^OOf-H^HCOcD 
CSQO^-iCOC^CSt^tD 


OS  -H-^cDt 


OSOOOiCOOOCOO 
CO  ^  ^  CO  ^  CO  CO  ^ 


©«<D*Jd(-+^h 


^  ^5  c3^«3  9  ©  d  S 


d  (-•  3  d  "*^  d 

•7   ^  O  ©   d   I 


■^lO-^^Htoeoeoo 

oOGO^oseocoift^ 
coco-^co^-^coco 


COCO-'J'T-H'^it^C^IOSiO 


b*t*oc^'— <as»oiO 
cocococococacoco 


t^'^W^COO'^COCO 

cDOscOt^OS-HOSk/i 
<MC<IC^<MC^COC^C^ 


uo  r^  t^  .-H -H  c^  o  OS  th 

^  Tj*  <:0  C^  »0  t-*  OS  CO -^ 

1^-  ,-,  ^   ^  ,-(  ,-1  .-I  T-l  .-H 


'^-HiC'MOiftCO'«*< 
OOOSOi-i^hOC^ 


^is:^;- 


o_o 

o  o 


g-H(MMT»>iO!Ot»Q0 


a 

C3 

CD 

,  I I 

a ° 

a  ^ 

i  - 

°° o 

® H 

•3  '-H  C>f  CO -^lO  CO  t^od 

o 


.s.s 

bO-M 


CO  P_^ 

oQ  a 

.2  a  • 

-Q  m    • 

03 

"o^    - 

o'i,  © 

o  a)  o 

Ph 


214       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    180. 

The  sampling  was  done  by  Dr.  Stevens.  The  results  of  his  examina- 
tions are  given  in  Table  16.  They  show  that  the  crated  fruit  was  in  much 
better  condition  than  that  in  barrels  in  all  the  lots,  especially  those  of  the 
Howes  variety. 

The  results  of  these  tests  accord  with  the  conclusions  given  in  last  year's 
report  (pages  23  and  24)  regarding  the  use  of  crates  instead  of  barrels  as 
shipping  containers  for  cranberries.  These  results  were  confirmed  by 
those  obtained  with  shipments  of  berries  from  another  bog  to  Portland, 
Me.,  made  by  Dr.  Stevens,  but  not  described  here. 

12.  The  Relative  DevelopmeJit  of  Decay  in  Different  Periods  of  the  Storage 
Season.  —  The  four  series  of  tests  to  determine  this  were  conducted  as 
follows :  — 

(a)  On  September  22,  20  quart  cans  were  filled  with  entirely  sound  ber- 
ries from  each  of  7  half-filled  crates  of  Early  Black  fruit  picked  at  the 
same  time  in  the  same  general  location  on  the  station  bog  three  days 
before.  This  fruit  was  stored  at  once,  and  the  different  20-can  lots  were 
examined  one  after  another  at  intervals  of  two  weeks. 

(6)  On  October  4,  10  quart  cans  were  filled  with  sound  berries  from 
each  of  12  half-filled  crates  of  Howes  fruit  picked  at  the  same  time  and  in 
the  same  place  on  the  station  bog  the  day  before.  These  cans  were  stored 
at  once,  and  the  different  10-can  lots  were  examined  one  after  another  at 
weekly  intervals. 

(c)  Quart  cans  were  filled  with  sound  Early  Black  fruit  in  lots  of  10, 
from  each  of  13  half-filled  crates  successively,  at  weekly  intervals  from 
September  20  to  December  13,  inclusive,  the  berries  all  having  been 
picked  at  the  same  time  and  in  the  same  general  location  on  the  station 
bog  on  September  19.  The  cans  of  each  lot  were  stored  as  soon  as  filled 
and  were  examined  at  the  end  of  a  two-week  storage. 

(d)  Quart  cans  were  filled  with  sound  Howes  fruit  in  lots  of  10,  from 
each  of  1 1  half-filled  crates  successively,  at  weekly  intervals  from  October 
4  to  December  13,  inclusive,  the  berries  all  having  been  picked  at  the  same 
time  and  in  the  same  location  on  the  station  bog  on  October  3.  The  cans 
of  each  lot  were  stored  as  soon  as  filled  and  were  examined  at  the  end  of  a 
two-week  storage. 

The  arrangement  and  results  of  all  these  series  of  tests  are  given  in 
order  in  Table  17.  They  failed  to  show  any  distinct  difference  in  the  rate 
of  rot  development  in  the  various  periods  of  the  storage  season,  this  general 
result  differing  from  that  of  last  year's  experiment  ^  in  this  connection.. 
The  WTiter  now  thinks  that  the  handling  of  the  berries  in  selecting  them 
for  these  tests,  and  their  lack  of  ventilation  in  the  tightly  covered  cans,, 
may  have  so  affected  their  keeping  as  to  hide  different  results  that  perhaps 
would  have  been  obtained  under  more  normal  storage  conditions.  The 
description  of  the  tests  is  included  here  for  its  possible  value  in  making 
future  comparisons,  and  as  a  record  of  work  done.  Further  experiments 
along  this  line  should  be  tried. 

1  Bui.  No.  168,  Mass.  Agr.  Expt.  Sta.,  1916,  p.  18. 


REPORT   OF   CRANBERRY   SUBSTATION   FOR    1916.      215 


Table  17.  —  Rot   Development  among  Cranberries   stored  in  Tin  Cans 
in  Different  Periods  of  the  Storage  Season. 


Test  and  Variety. 

Quan- 
tity of 
Berries 

used 
(Quarts). 

Date 
stored. 

Date  ex- 
amined 
to  deter- 
mine 
Rot  Per- 
centage. 

Total 
Number 

of 
Berries. 

Number 
of  Rot- 
ten and 
Partly 
Rotten 
Berries 
when  ex- 
amined 

after 
Storage. 

Percent- 
age of 
Rotten 

and 
Partly 
Rotten 
Berries 

found  at 
End  of 
Storage. 

(o),  Early  Black, 

20 

Sept.  22 

Oct.     6 

11,415 

450 

3.94 

20 

Sept.  22 

Oct.    20 

11,641 

1,516 

13.02 

20 

Sept.  22 

Nov.    3 

11,506 

3,069 

26.67 

20 

Sept.  22 

Nov.  17 

11,630 

4,167 

35.83 

20 

Sept.  22 

Dec.     1 

11,781 

5,118 

43.44 

20 

Sept.  22 

Dec.  15 

11,599 

6,316 

54.45 

20 

Sept.  22 

Dec.  29 

11,412 

6,532 

57.24 

(6),  Howes, 

10 

Oct.     4 

Oct.    11 

4,903 

71 

1.45 

10 

Oct.     4 

Oct.    18 

4,905 

100 

2.04 

10 

Oct.     4 

Oct.    25 

4,960 

228 

4.60 

10 

Oct.     4 

Nov.    1 

4,961 

418 

8.43 

10 

Oct.     4 

Nov.    8 

4,888 

503 

10.29 

10 

Oct.     4 

Nov.  15 

4,981 

776 

15.58 

10 

Oct.     4 

Nov.  22 

4,948 

860 

17.38 

10 

Oct.     4 

Nov.  29 

4,877 

939 

19.25 

10 

Oct.     4 

Dec.     6 

4,894 

1,147 

23.44 

10 

Oct.     4 

Dec.  13 

5,029 

1,494 

29.71 

10 

Oct.     4 

Dec.  20 

4,821 

1,353 

28.06 

10 

Oct.     4 

Dec.  27 

4,845 

1,553 

32.05 

(c),  Early  Black, 

10 

Sept.  20 

Oct.     4 

5,779 

301 

5.21 

10 

Sept.  27 

Oct.    11 

5,530 

308 

5.57 

10 

Oct.     4 

Oct.    18 

5,602 

137 

2.45 

10 

Oct.    11 

Oct.    25 

5,782 

222 

3.24 

10 

Oct.    18 

Nov.    1 

5,441 

240 

4.41 

10 

Oct.    25 

Nov.    8 

5,363 

140 

2.61 

10 

Nov.    1 

Nov.  15 

5,379 

201 

3.74 

10 

Nov.    8 

Nov.  22 

5,487 

220 

4.01 

10 

Nov.  16 

Nov.  30 

5,693 

295 

5.18 

10 

Nov.  22 

Dec.     6 

5,684 

315 

5.54 

10 

Nov.  29 

Dec.  13 

5,510 

307 

5.57 

10 

Dec.     6 

Dec.  20 

5,763 

304 

5.28 

10 

Dec.  13 

Dec.  27 

6,513 

476 

8.63 

216       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    180. 


Table  17.  —  Rot  Development  among  Cranberries  stored  in  Tin   Cans 
in  Different  Periods  of  the  Storage  Season  —  Concluded. 


Number 

Percent- 

of Rot- 

age of 

Quan- 
tity of 
Berries 

used 
(Quarts). 

Date  ex- 

ten and 

Rotten 

amined 

Total 

Partly 

and 

Test  and  Vabiety. 

Date 
stored. 

to  deter- 
mine 

Number 
of 

Rotten 
Berries 

Partly 
Rotten 

Rot  Per- 

Berries. 

when  ex- 

Berries 

centage. 

amined 

found  at 

after 

End  of 

Storage. 

Storage. 

(d),  Howes, 

10 

Oct.      4 

Oct.    18 

4.643 

118 

2.54 

10 

Oct.    11 

Oct.    25 

4,730 

104 

2.20 

10 

Oct.    18 

Nov.    1 

4,908 

191 

3.89 

10 

Oct.    25 

Nov.    8 

4,570 

117 

2.56 

10 

Nov.    1 

Nov.  15 

4,546 

103 

2.27 

10 

Nov.    8 

Nov.  22 

4,633 

129 

2.78 

10 

Nov.  15 

Nov.  29 

4,808 

116 

2.41 

10 

Nov.  23 

Dec.     7 

4,747 

112 

2.36 

10 

Nov.  29 

Dec.  13 

4,915 

145 

2.95 

10 

Dec.     6 

Dec.  20 

4.943 

155 

3.14 

10 

Dec.  13 

Dec.  27 

4,849 

142 

2.93 

I 

13.  Inciibaior  Test  of  Keeping  Quality  of  Cranberries.  —  A  few  lots  of 
Early  Black  berries  were  moistened  and  tested  as  to  their  keeping  quality  in 
quart  cans,  ■with  the  covers  on  tight  but  not  sealed,  in  a  chicken  incubator 
run  at  a  temperature  of  80°  F.  The  results  seemed  to  show  that  the  rela- 
tive keeping  quality  of  cranberries  can  be  determined  in  this  way  in  a 
period  of  about  forty-eight  hours. 


Tentative  Practical  Conclusions  based  on  the  Results  of  the  Storage  Tests. 

1.  Cranberries  should  not  be  picked  wet. 

2.  Scoop-picking  is  not  particularly  harmful  to  keeping  quality. 

3.  Deep  scooping  is  likely  to  affect  cranberrry  keeping  adversely  be- 
cause it  gathers  maximum  amounts  of  under  berries,  loose  leaves  and  sand, 
these  materials  being  harmful  in  storage. 

4.  Cranberries  left  in  the  sun  on  the  bog  for  a  good  part  of  the  day 
during  picking  seem  to  keep  about  as  well  as  those  housed  at  once,  under 
average  storage-house  conditions.  There  might  be  a  great  difference  in 
this  regard,  however,  if  cooler  storage  were  practiced,  for  the  relatively 
high  temperature  usually  had  by  the  berries  when  they  are  picked  proba- 
bly has  a  hurtful  effect,  hence  the  sooner  they  are  cooled  the  better. 

5.  Lack  of  sufficient  ventilation  affects  cranberry  keeping  adversely, 
apparently  by  interfering  with  the  process  of  respiration,  not  by  prevent- 


REPORT   OF   CRANBERRY   SUBSTATION   FOR    1916.      217 

ing  the  evaporation  of  moisture,  as  suggested  in  last  year's  report  (pages 
6  to  17).  Cranberries,  like  other  fruits,  are  living,  breathing  organisms 
when  picked,  and  must  take  in  oxj^gen  and  give  off  carbon  dioxide  freely 
to  'continue  their  Hfe  processes.  They  may  do  this  for  several  months 
after  they  are  taken  from  the  vines.  Lack  of  ventilation  probably  affects 
them  in  much  the  same  way  that  smothering  does  an  animal,  —  by  per- 
mitting the  accumulation  of  the  carbon  dioxide  gas  given  oft'  by  their 
tissues  and  thus  reducing  their  supply  of  oxygen.  The  harmful  effect 
of  the  carbon  dioxide  appears  to  be  prett}^  well  demonstrated  by  the 
experiments  described  by  Dr.  Shear  and  his  associates  in  another  part 
of  this  bulletin  (page  237).  This  gas  appears  to  collect  in  injurious  quan- 
tities among  cranberries,  both  in  storage  and  shipment,  because  of  the 
closeness  with  which  the  fruit  packs  together  and  of  the  size  of  the  con- 
tainers used. 

As  has  been  so  splendidly  demonstrated  with  apples,^  the  rapidity  of 
the  life  processes  in  fruits  varies  directly  with  temperature,  much  more 
carbon  dioxide  being  given  off  at  high  than  at  low  temperatures.  While 
cranberries  may  not  behave  exactly  as  apples  do,  it  seems  to  follow  that 
low  temperatures  are  important  to  cranberry  keeping  both  in  storage  and 
shipment,  for  with  such  temperatures  the  need  of  ventilation  is  probably 
less. 

The  general  problem  divides  itself  naturally  into  two  parts,  as  follows :  — 

(a)  Storage  previous  to  Shipment  —  Low  temperatures,  because  of  their 
retarding  effect  on  the  process  of  respiration  and  on  the  growth  of  rot- 
producing  fungi,  seem  most  important.  The  storage  house,  therefore, 
probably  should  be  constructed  and  managed  to  maintain  such  tempera- 
tures, without  resorting  to  artificial  cold  storage,  at  as  little  expense  as 
possible.  This  in  turn,  however,  is  likely  in  practice  to  depend  largely  on 
arrangements  for  free  but  controllable  ventilation.  If,  as  the  results  of 
the  experiments  described  by  Dr.  Shear  and  his  collaborators  on  page  238 
seem  to  tend  to  show,  a  damp  atmosphere  does  not  injure  the  keeping  of 
this  fruit,  the  thorough  ventilating  of  the  storage  room  during  the  night 
and  on  cold  days  would  be  the  cheapest  means  of  obtaining  low  tempera- 
tures, and  they  probably  should  be  maintained  as  far  as  possible  by  the 
use  of  dead-air  spaces  in  the  walls.  To  combine  satisfactory  arrangements 
for  free  but  controllable  ventilation  and  for  effective  heat  insulation  at  a 
reasonable  expense  is  probably,  therefore,  the  main  problem  to  be  solved 
by  future  builders  of  cranberry  storage  houses.  Artificial  cold  storage  for 
cranberries  has  not  been  investigated  much  yet,  and  therefore  is  not  con- 
sidered here. 

(b)  Preparation  for  Shipment.  —  While  a  low  temperature  is  still  prob- 
ably desirable  for  cranberries  after  they  leave  the  producer,  this  factor, 
except  as  it  may  be  utilized  by  cooling  previous  to  shipment  or  by  shipping 
in  refrigerator  cars,  is  largely  out  of  his  control.    He  should,  therefore, 

>  F.  W.  Morse,  Bui.  No.  135,  New  Hampshire  Agr.  Expt.  Sta.,  1908,  and  Journal  of  the  Ameri- 
can Chemical  Society,  Vol.  30,  No.  5,  1908. 


218       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    180. 

make  the  most  of  careful  handling  of  the  fruit  in  packing  and  of  proper 
ventilation  for  it  while  in  transit  and  in  the  market.  The  latter  seems  to 
call  especially  for  close  grading  and  for  the  use  of  as  small  and  open  con- 
tainers as  practicable. 

6.  The  separator  problem  is  still  unsolved. 

Resanding. 

The  year's  experience  with  the  plots,  results  with  which  have  been  dis- 
cussed in  previous  reports,  is  shown  in  Table  18.  The  check  areas  were  in 
each  case  laid  out  adjacent  to  and  on  opposite  sides  of  the  plot.  All  the 
plots  and  checks  were  picked  with  scoops.  The  storage-test  berries  were 
selected  by  handfuls  from  different  parts  of  the  crates  as  they  came  from 
the  bog  and  put  in  quart  cans,  each  can  representing  one  crate.  The  cans 
were  stored  with  covers  on  tight  but  not  sealed. 

This,  the  sisventh  year  since  resanding  was  discontinued  on  plots  0  and 
V,  is  the  first  one  except  1913  in  which  their  yield  has  been  noticeably 
reduced  as  compared  with  that  of  the  checks.  Throughout  the  season 
these  unsanded  plots  presented  a  marked  contrast  to  the  surrounding  bog 
which  was  resanded  in  1912  and  1914,  their  vines  being  comparatively 
very  thin  and  sickly  in  appearance. 


REPORT   OF   CRANBERRY   SUBSTATION   FOR    1916.      219 


si 


1^ 

C3 

CO 

<» 
(5^ 


05 


i 


n 

e2 


Percent- 
age of 
Rotten 

and 
Partly 
Rotten 
Berriea 

found  at 

End  of 

Storage 

Test. 

t0-Ht000OT)<0»00M00l««C<Il0t^l«00t" 

<D 

s 

.2 

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 

S2SSS$SS2SS3B2S2SS 

ftanaaaaaa  a  a  a  a  a  a-s  -s"  *; 

Quantity 

placed 

in  Storage 

Test 
(Quarts). 

000000000000000000000000000000000000 

Quantity 

of 

Fruit  per 

Square 

Rod 

(Bushels). 

COOOOOOCO-^OOOICDOSOOOt-iO^tPOS*^ 

Quantity 
of  Fruit 
obtained 
(Bush- 
els). 

COCOOCOCOO^<OC^tOC^iO^H4000r^cOCO 

OOCOOSOQOCOOOO'IMC^'^COOSCOCO^HOCO 

p. 

I^t^l.,t~COC0tOtOQ0000000iO>n>O'*Tlllll 

a  a  a  a  a  a  a  a  a  a  a  a  a  a  a-s  -s  -K 
iMaacBajMMascBCBwajccmajaiOOO 

-a 

a 

C3 

a 

o 

Not  since  November,  1909, 

Spring  of  1912  and  fall  of  1914,    . 

Spring  of  1912  and  fall  of  1914,    . 

Spring  of  1912  and  fall  of  1914,    . 

Not  since  November,  1909, 

Fall  of  1911  and  fall  of  1914, 

Fall  of  1911  and  fall  of  1914, 

Fallof  1911  and  fall  of  1914, 

Yearly  in  the  fall,  1911  to  1915,  inclusive. 

Fall  of  1911  and  fall  of  1914, 

Fall  of  1911  and  fall  of  1914, 

Fallof  1911  and  fall  of  1914, 

Yearly  in  the  fall,  1911  to  1915,  inclusive, 

Fallof  1911  and  fall  of  1914, 

Fall  of  1911  and  fall  of  1914, 

Yearly  in  the  fall,  1911  to  1915,  inclusive, 

Fall  of  1911  and  fall  of  1914, 

Fall  of  1911  and  fall  of  1914, 

C3 
> 

^^^^C3^c3^tic3^^c3^^ 

SSmSSSSSmSSSSSm  -^-^- 

III  1^  1^  "j^  T^  "C  "t^  T1 1- 'u  T^  1^  "u  1^  1^  5  £  £ 

c8c3do3oic3cJaJcJo3o3oScjc3  ca  O  O  O 

§ 

o 

a 
o 

a 
< 

ChcJco      C?e?co      -^ccieo      .-km      ^cJ 

^^^       ^MM       .^•^■^       ^^       JiJi 
■  o  o  o    ■  o  o  «    •  o  o  o    •  o  o    •  o  o 
oil*      <D<ua)      22S      22      «<» 
^j3ja     MJiJS     -S-S-S     '?'^     -dJa 
333    333    SSS-    &3.    SS 

>■*>>>  o"o  o  o  ;z;"^;  15  ;z;  rttf  « tH*EH  Eh 

220       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    180. 


Summary  of  Table  18. 


Plots  and 
Checks. 

Total 

Area 

(Square 

Rods). 

When  resanded. 

Total 
Quantity 
of  Fruit 

picked 
(Bushels). 

Average 

Quantity 

of  Fruit 

per  Square 

Rod 
(Bushels). 

Average 
Percentage 
of  Rotten 
and  Partly 

Rotten 
Berries  at 

End  of 

Storage 
Test. 

Plots  0  and  V, 
Checks  0  and  V,    . 
Plots  N,  R  and  T,  . 
Checks  N,  R  and  T, 

18 

27 
56 

Not  since  November,  1909, 

Twice  since  1909, 

Yearly  in  the  fall,  1911  to 

1915,  inclusive. 
Twice  since  1909, 

16.66 
64.73 
32.55 
77.87 

.93 
1.31 
1.21 
1.39 

58.61 
49.38 
32.10 
29.70 

The  keeping  qualities  of  the  fruit  of  the  sanding  plots  and  their  checks 
were  determined  by  storage  tests  each  year  from  1912  to  1916,  inclusive. 
The  results  of  these  tests  and  their  averages  are  given  in  the  following 
table :  — 


REPORT   OF   CRANBERRY   SUBSTATION   FOR    1916.      221 


P, 


e 


I 


<D 

to 

CO 

^_^ 

CO 

o 

o 

(M 

M 

o 

ui 

^ 

OJ 

■^ 

to 

OS 

o 

14 

o 

•«1< 

CO 

ca 

d 

d 

s 

CO 

c 

"^ 

c 

M 

M 

O, 

e<) 

n 

to 

lO 

CO 

o 

CO 

UO 

Cd 

^ 

«5 

CO 

c^" 

o 

•<JI 

lO 

d 

lO 

d 

o  -; 

S 

o 

"5 

U3 

■* 

►.  S 

<M 

CI 

m 

Ol 

,_, 

o 

CO 

"5 

CO 

"5 

in 

CO 

03 

CO 

o> 

oo 
d 

CO 

CO 
CO 

P^  ■< 

?3 

C^ 

cq 

»-H 

M 

»-l 

-<M 

o» 

CO 

•* 

t^ 

_^ 

„ 

^ 

^ 

■* 

CO 

^  S; 

^ 

"5 

Oi 

CO 

•« 

to 

m 

lO 

t- 

H  O 

o^ 

d 

CO 

t^ 

^ 

■^ 

a> 

■* 

■* 

od 

CO 

o  » 

ii 

(M 

CJ 

CO 

(M 

c^ 

e<i 

»-4 

tfW 

b  H 

lO 

o 

o 

o 

lO 

Tji 

o 

o 

»o 

o 

O  «! 

CO 

t^ 

M 

■* 

CO 

(M 

o 

<M 

t-: 

■* 

QQ 

Ok 

d 

^ 

o> 

od 

00 

d 

d 

■* 

od 

d 

H 

^ 

■>»< 

M 

CJ 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

e^ 

O 

TS 

13 

T3 

H 

o 

«fl 

o 

o 

o 

B 

(D 

u 

t^ 

CO 

o> 

u* 

u 

K 

C4 

03 

1 

a 

1 

03 

t 

cq 
^ 

d 

00 

d 

-*J 

s 

cq 

-2 

m 

01 

o 

O 

O 

IS 

Z 

^ 

. 

. 

<D 

<o 

. 

o 

> 

> 

_> 

, 

^ 

, 

1 

§ 

3 

. 

O 

o 

_a 

_a 

_fl 

« 

>o 

lo 

d" 

■^ 

13 

05 

•* 

Ol 

■^ 

ca 

■* 

OS 

■* 

■§ 

«« 

o> 

s 

s 

o 

en 

o 

o> 

a 

O 

C3 

s 

3 

O 

Ol 

o 

en 

O 

s 

o 

t-t 

'— ; 

'— * 

— * 

»-* 

—* 

d 

"B 

03 

03 

03 

a 

a) 

a 

03 

^ 

•T3 

•2 

T3 

.2 

■a 

.2 

T! 

o» 

05 

a 

a 

a 

a 

o 

S 

O 

03 

s 

03 

03 

.a 

03 

'"' 

*"• 

_, 

"^^ 

^ 

■*^ 

^ 

"*^ 

*^ 

s 

s 

05 

.2 

en 

_fl 

05 

.9 

<j> 

o 

a 

M 

«4-l 

_>. 

*«-< 

_>. 

44-1 

_>, 

t*H 

"3 

.s 

tn 

O 

o 

0 

o 

'o 

O 
I? 

? 
fe 

"5 

? 
fe 

;S 

1^ 

S'^ 

•* 

^ 

t^ 

2 

•^ 

< 

S-a 

o 

o 

o» 

CM 

o» 

o 

c» 

o> 

O 

CO 

oo 

>. 

^ 

M 

^ 

^ 

^ 

M 

^'' 

^" 

: 

o 

c> 

u 

o 

o 

o 

. 

^ 

C3 

a 

j2 

_a 

OJ 

03 

03 

1 

s 

s 

« 

S 

S 

s 

s 

« 

> 

m 

>> 

_>. 

_>. 

_>. 

>. 

^ 

^ 

^ 

p 

't^ 

^ 

'fr^ 

u< 

'n 

u 

^ 

(H 

is 

S3 

C3 

C3 

C3 

^ 

03 

03 

03 

o 

o 

w 

H 

W 

W 

w 

w 

W 

W 

M 

S! 

X 

• 

• 

M 

o 

H 

H 

O 

* 

q 

* 

' 

* 

.< 

. 

. 

^ 

^ 

- 

(D 

J 

!3 

• 

1 

• 

J3 

■ 

.3 

H 

o 

o 

O 

o 

o 

o 

0) 

o 

o 

2 

o 

ij 

^ 

XI 

^ 

, 

.g 

^ 

^ 

CL, 

^ 

3 

V 

V 

3 

> 

> 

d 

O 

;? 

:2; 

« 

rt 

H 

H 

222       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    180. 


Fertilizers. 

The  season's  results  with  the  station  bog  fertiUzer  plots  are  given  in 
Table  20.  The  area  of  each  plot,  as  stated  in  the  report  for  1912,  is  8 
square  rods,  and  the  variety  of  berries  tested  is  the  Early  Black.  The 
plots  are  on  a  peat  bog  with  a  covering  of  sand  ranging  from  6  to  8  inches 
in  thickness. 


Table  20.  —  Fertilizer   Plots   in   1916.       Yield   and   Relative   Keeping 

Quality  of  Berries. 


Plot. 

Fertilizer  used. 

Date 
treated 
in  1916. 

Date 
picked. 

Quan- 
tity of 
Berries 
pro- 
duced 
(Bush- 
els). 

Quan- 
tity of 
Berries 

in 
Storage 

Test 
(Quarts). 

Date 
Stored 
Berries 
were  ex- 
amined 
to  de- 
termine 

Rot 
Percent- 
age. 

Percent- 
age of 
Rotten 

and 
Partly 
Rotten 
Berries 

found  at 
End  of 
Storage 
Test. 

1 

0.    , 

_ 

Sept.  22 

10.67 

8' 

Dec.    4 

46.86 

2 

N,    . 

June  24 

Sept.  22 

9.33 

8 

Dee.   4 

50.21 

3 

P.    . 

June  24 

Sept.  22 

9.00 

8 

Dec.   4 

45.90 

4 

K,    . 

June  24 

Sept.  22 

9.60 

8 

Dec.    4 

53.78 

5 

0,      . 

- 

Sept.  22 

9.20 

8 

Dec.    4 

49.61 

6 

NP, 

June  24 

Sept.  22 

6.33 

8 

Dec.    5 

57.64 

7 

NK. 

June  24 

Sept.  22 

6.60 

8 

Dec.    5 

56.33 

8 

PK, 

June  26 

Sept.  22 

8.00 

8 

Dec.    7 

49.00 

9 

0,      . 

- 

Sept.  22 

9.00 

8 

Dec.    7 

45.14 

10 

NPK, 

June  27 

Sept.  22 

6.88 

8 

Dec.    7 

43.80 

23 

Peats, 

- 

Sept.  22 

8.00 

8 

Dec.    9 

39.39 

11 

NPKL, 

June  27 

Sept.  23 

2.86 

8 

Dec.    7 

59.07 

12 

NPKcl, 

June  27 

Sept.  23 

6.00 

8 

Dec.    7 

50.98 

13 

0,      . 

- 

Sept.  23 

7.67 

8 

Dec.   8 

41.12 

14 

Ni.PK. 

June  26 

Sept.  23 

5.50 

8 

Dec.   8 

55.84 

15' 

NaPK, 

June  26 

Sept.  23 

4.52 

12 

Dec.   8 

63.10 

16 

NKPi,, 

June  26 

Sept.  23 

7.20 

8 

Deo.   8 

55.81 

17 

0.      . 

- 

Sept.  23 

9.33 

8 

Deo.   8 

39.87 

18 

NKP2. 

June  26 

Sept.  23 

8.33 

8 

Deo.   8 

47.36 

19 

NPKii. 

June  26 

Sept.  23 

7.75 

8 

Deo.   8 

53.08 

20 

NPKo." 

June  26 

Sept.  23 

9.00 

8 

Dec.   8 

59.94 

21 

0,      . 

- 

Sept.  23 

10.33 

8 

Dec.   8 

49.63 

*■  The  storage-test  berries  from  each  plot  were  stored,  without  being  run  through  a  separator 
or  otherwise  cleaned,  in  quart  cans  on  the  day  they  were  picked,  each  can  being  filled  with 
handfuls  of  fruit  taken  from  different  parts  of  a  separate  picking  crate,  its  contents  thus  rep- 
resenting as  fairly  as  possible  the  contents  of  the  crate  as  it  came  from  the  bog.  The  covers 
of  the  cans  fitted  tightly  during  the  storage,  but  were  not  sealed. 

»  Leaf  mold  worked  into  a  condition  in  which  it  could  be  spread  easily  with  a  shovel. 

•  The  figures  for  plot  15  are  probably  misleading,  as  half  of  that  plot  was  used  in  spraying  tests 
with  Bordeaux  mixture  in  1913,  1914  and  1915,  and  certain  effects  of  that  treatment  may  have 
remained  in  1916;  though,  if  the  whole  plot  had  yielded  at  the  same  rate  as  did  the  portion 
that  never  had  been  sprayed,  it  would  have  produced  only  5.33  bushels.  The  rot  percentage 
given  for  this  plot  is  an  average  of  the  percentages  obtained  in  the  tests  of  the  fruit  of  the  sprayed 
and  the  unsprayed  parts. 


REPORT   OF   CRANBERRY   SUBSTATION   FOR    1916.      223 

Plots  1,  5,  9,  13,  17  and  21  are  all  untreated  checks.  The  meanings  of 
the  symbols  used  in  the  table  are  as  follows :  — 

0=  Nothing. 

N  =100  pounds  nitrate  of  soda  per  acre. 

P  =400  pounds  acid  phosphate  per  acre. 

K  =200  pounds  high-grade  sulfate  of  potash  per  acre. 

L  =  1  ton  of  (slaked)  lime  per  acre. 

Kcl  =200  pounds  muriate  of  potash  per  acre. 

Niii  =150  pounds  nitrate  of  soda  per  acre. 

Ni  =200  pounds  nitrate  of  soda  per  acre. 

Pi  J  =600  pounds  acid  phosphate  per  acre. 

Pj  =800  pounds  acid  phosphate  per  acre. 

In  combination  they  mean,  for  example,  as  follows:  N2PK  =  200 
pounds  of  nitrate  of  soda  +  400  pounds  of  acid  phosphate  +  200  pounds 
of  high-grade  sulfate  of  potash  per  acre. 

As  the  table  shows,  the  fruit  of  the  fertilized  areas  this  season  was,  as 
a  rule,  much  inferior  in  both  quantity  and  keeping  quality  to  that  of  the 
checks,  this  being  especially  marked  with  the  plots  treated  with  lime  and 
with  the  maximum  amount  of  nitrate  of  soda.  Considering  aU  the  expe- 
rience with  these  plots  since  they  were  started  in  1911,  it  is  the  writer's 
judgment  that,  in  general,  whatever  slight  advantage  in  yield  has  been 
gained  by  the  use  of  the  fertilizers  has  been  balanced  by  the  cost  of  the 
treatment,  the  deterioration  in  the  quality  of  the  fruit  and  the  greater 
cost  of  picking  due  to  the  increased  vine  growth. 

Insects. 
The  Cranberry  Rootworm  {Rhabdopterus  picipes  (Oliv.)). 

The  rearing  of  the  beetles  definitely  identified  the  infestation  by  the 
cranberry  rootworm  {Rhabdopterus  picipes  (Oliv.))  tentatively  recorded  in 
last  year's  report  (pages  32  and  33).  By  the  beginning  of  winter  the  grubs 
of  this  insect  nearly  complete  their  growth.  They  are  then,  except  the 
head,  for  the  most  part  nearly  white  in  color  and  somewhat  over  a  quarter 
of  an  inch  long.  They  hibernate  without  growing  larger.  They  do  some 
feeding  in  the  spring  and  change  into  pupae  in  June.  No  beetles  of  the 
infestation  under  observation  had  yet  emerged  on  June  30,  this  season,  a 
collection  of  the  insects  taken  that  day  consisting  of  4  grubs  and  32  pupee. 
One  beetle  was  found  on  July  1,  and  during  the  following  two  weeks  they 
practically  all  came  out,  the  period  of  most  rapid  emergence  extending 
from  the  3d  to  the  11th  of  the  month. 

It  was  anticipated  that  the  adults  might  feed  freely  on  the  cranberry 
foliage,  and  at  the  writer's  suggestion  an  arsenical  spray  was  applied  to  the 
infested  area  on  July  3  and  repeated  on  the  11th  and  18th.  In  the  first 
two  applications,  2\  pounds  of  "Corona"  arsenate  of  lead  and  1  heaping 
teaspoonful  of  white  arsenic  to  40  gallons  of  water  were  used.  For  the  last 
treatment  the  mixture  was  the  same,  except  that  the  arsenic  was  increased 


224       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    180. 

to  1^  teaspoonfuls'  to  40  gallons.  The  writer  suggested  only  the  arsenate 
of  lead,  fearing  arsenic  would  do  harm.  The  latter  was  added  by  the  fore- 
man of  the  bog  to  do  a  thorough  job,  and  fortunately  no  injury  resulted. 

The  wTiter  visited  the  bog  on  July  20  and  found  dead  rootworm  beetles 
in  large  numbers  under  the  vines,  most  of  them  being  in  a  dry  and  brittle 
condition.  Only  a  very  few  were  crawling  about.  The  cranberry  foHage 
on  the  infested  area  showed  that  the  beetles  had  fed  freely  upon  it.  As  6  of 
15  beetles,  collected  July  11  and  kept  at  the  station  screenhouse,  were  still 
active  on  the  26th,  the  condition  of  those  found  on  the  bog  on  the  20th 
seemed  to  indicate  that  the  spraying  had  been  effective.  This  bog  was 
kept  under  observation  until  the  end  of  the  season,  and  no  evidence  of  the 
continued  presence  of  the  pest  was  discovered,  it  having  been  practically 
exterminated  by  the  treatment. 

Prof.  H.  B.  Scammell  has  published  a  valuable  bulletin  on  this  insect.^ 

The  Gypsy  Moth  {Porthetria  dispar  L.). 

Several  quarts  of  egg  masses  were  collected  from  trees  late  in  December, 
1915,  and  early  in  January,  1916,  and  divided  into  lots  of  about  a  half  quart 
each,  two  of  these  being  put  in  cans  ^\ith  moist  sand  in  the  bottom  and 
placed  in  the  basement  of  the  station  screenhouse  for  checks,  the  others 
being  enclosed  in  cloth  netting  sacks  and  submerged  for  the  winter  in  3 
feet  of  water  in  a  pond. 

The  eggs  of  the  check  lots  hatched  almost  perfectly.  The  dates  on  which 
the  various  submerged  lots  were  taken  from  the  water,  and  the  ^Titer's 
estimates  of  the  percentages  of  eggs  that  hatched,  were  as  follows:  lot  1, 
April  2,  25  per  cent.;  lot  2,  April  18,  20  per  cent.;  lot  3,  April  23,  18  per 
cent.;  lot  4,  May  1,  25  per  cent.;  lot  5,  May  5,  20  per  cent.;  lot  6,  May 
13,  20  per  cent.;  lot  7,  May  24,  5  per  cent.  The  submergence  did  not 
seem  to  kill  the  eggs  as  readily  in  these  tests  as  in  those  reported  last  j'-ear. 
This  may  have  been  due  to  the  unseasonable  coldness  of  the  spring  this 
season,  which  probably  caused  the  water  in  the  pond  to  warm  up  more 
slowly  than  usual. 

On  May  29,  59  gypsy-moth  caterpillars  from  one-eighth  to  five-six- 
teenths of  an  inch  long  were  submerged  on  the  leaves  of  an  oak  branch 
just  as  they  were  taken  from  the  woods,  in  8  inches  of  water  in  a  washtub. 
All  but  3  of  the  worms  clung  to  the  branch  and  went  down  into  the 
water  with  it.  At  the  end  of  a  forty-three-hour  submergence,  8  floated 
on  the  surface,  4  had  sunk  to  the  bottom  of  the  tub,  and  47  still  clung 
to  the  leaves.  These  worms  were  watched  for  two  days  after  the  close 
of  the  test,  but  only  1  of  the  59  showed  any  sign  of  life. 

On  May  31,  50  caterpillars  from  one-quarter  to  five-sixteenths  of  an 
inch  long  were  submerged,  as  before,  on  the  leaves  of  an  oak  branch  in  9 
inches  of  water.  All  these  worms  clung  to  the  leaves  tenaciously  when 
submerged.    After  twenty-two  hours  in  the  water,  2  floated  on  the  surface, 

>  The  Cranberry  Rootworm,  Bui.  No.  263,  U.  S.  Dept.  Agr.,  1915. 


REPORT   OF   CRANBERRY   SUBSTATION   FOR    1916.      225 

3  had  sunk  to  the  bottom,  and  45  still  clung  to  the  leaves.  They  were 
then  taken  from  the  water,  and  \^ithin  seven  hours  26  had  nearly  or  en- 
tirely recovered. 

On  June  1,  152  worms  from  one-quarter  to  three-eighths  of  an  inch  long 
were  submerged  on  the  leaves  of  an  oak  branch,  as  before,  in  9  inches  of 
water.  After  thirty-eight  and  one-half  hours  of  submergence,  46  floated 
on  the  water,  most  of  them  being  alive  and  active,  40  had  sunk  to  the 
bottom,  and  66  still  clung  to  the  leaves.  Those  clinging  to  the  branch 
were  then  taken  from  the  water  and  watched,  and  only  a  few  ever  showed 
any  sign  of  recovery.  As  a  rule,  the  worms  that  came  to  the  surface  of 
the  water  were  among  the  largest  of  those  submerged,  as  was  also  the 
case  in  later  tests,  descriptions  of  which  are  not  included  here. 

The  results  of  these  experiments  and  of  observations  of  bog  flooding 
operations,  in  which  the  small  gypsy  caterpillars  behaved  similarly,  have 
led  the  writer  to  the  folio-wing  conclusions :  — 

1.  That  reflowing  for  this  insect  Tvill  be  most  satisfactory  if  done  while 
the  worms  are  small  and  probably  before  the  largest  are  more  than  five- 
sixteenths  of  an  inch  long.  The  sooner  it  is  done  after  the  eggs  are  all 
hatched  the  less  will  be  the  damage  from  the  feeding  of  the  worms  and 
the  less  the  trouble  from  their  floating  ashore  alive,  as  it  is  evidently  the 
habit  of  the  very  young  caterpillars  to  cling  to  their  support  when  sub- 
merged. 

2.  To  be  entirely  effective,  even  when  the  worms  are  small,  a  flowage 
must  probably  be  held  nearly  forty  hours. 

Mr.  C.  W.  Minott  of  the  Bureau  of  Entomology  of  the  United  States 
Department  of  Agriculture  conducted  some  interesting  investigations 
during  May  and  June,  1916,  concerning  the  wind-spread  of  gypsy-moth 
caterpillars  on  cranberry  bogs.  With  his  permission  the  following  con- 
densed account  of  these  studies  is  given  here :  — 

Two  bogs  in  Carver,  Mass.,  were  selected  for  experiments  on  wind  dispersion, 
namely.  Muddy  Pond  bog,  containing  about  100  acres,  and  John's  Pond  bog,  con- 
taining about  44  acres  (including  pond).  Six  screens  made  of  cotton  cloth  tacked 
to  a  frame  in  two  sections,  each  being  3  by  10  feet,  were  set  up  horizontally  just 
above  the  tops  of  the  vines  at  various  distances  from  the  neighboring  woodlands. 
Each  screen  contained  60  square  feet  of  cloth  upon  which  "  tanglefoot  "  was  applied. 
Daily  examinations  of  each  screen  were  made  and  data  were  taken  concerning  the 
temperature  and  the  direction  and  velocity  of  the  wind  during  the  dispersion  period. 

The  screens  were  located  on  the  bogs  at  various  distances,  ranging  from  400  to 
1,200  feet,  from  woodland  infestations.  From  one  screen,  located  600  feet  from 
infested  woodland  on  the  northwest  and  900  feet  on  the  west,  62  small  caterpillars 
were  removed  during  the  season,  or  slightly  more  than  1  to  the  square  foot.  A 
total  of  143  small  worms  was  wind-borne  on  to  the  six  screens,  which  indicated 
that  an  average  of  about  17,000  per  acre  blew  on  to  the  bogs.  The  infestations 
around  these  bogs  are  as  yet  only  medium  in  extent,  this  showing  what  may  be 
expected  when  the  surroundings  of  bogs  become  thickly  infested.  ^ 

1  Collins,  C.  W.:  Methods  used  in  determining  Wind  Dispersion  of  the  Gipsy  Moth  and  Some 
Other  Insects,  Journal  of  Economic  Entomology,  Vol.  10,  p.  174,  1917. 


226       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    180. 


The  Cranberry  Tip  Worm  {Dasyneura  vaccinii  Smith  ^) . 

The  season's  observations  of  the  effect  of  resanding  on  the  abundance 
of  this  pest  sustained  the  conclusions  heretofore  reported. 

One  species  of  Chalcidid  (Tetrastichus  sp.  2)  and,  two  of  Proctotrypid 
(Aphanogmiis  sp.  ^  and  Ceraphron  sp. ')  parasites  were  reared  from  the 
larVse  of  the  last  brood  after  they  had  encased  themselves  in  their  cocoons 
this  season.  Two  of  these  {Tetrastichus  sp.and  Aphanogmns  sp.)  emerged  in 
only  small  numbers,  but  the  Ceraphron  species  had  infested  a  large,  though 
undetermined,  majority  of  the  maggots  collected  by  the  writer,  and  its 
adults  kept  coming  out  from  August  9  to  September  14,  inclusive,  their 
period  of  most  rapid  emergence  being  from  August  12  to  August  22. 

The  eggs  of  the  tip  worm  are  not  "white"  as  they  have  been  described.* 
They  are  watery  translucent  in  appearance,  with  scattered  pinkish  pig- 
ment, and  are  about  one-third  of  a  millimeter  long.  They  are  elongate, 
usually  slightly  curved  from  end  to  end,  with  rounded  and  sHghtly  nar- 
rowed ends  and  without  noticeable  surface  markings. 

The  Black-Head  Fireworm  {Rhopohota  vacciniana  (Pack.)). 

Prof.  H.  B.  Scammell,  in  cranberry  insect  investigations  in  New  Jersey 
for  the  Bureau  of  Entomology,  had  much  success  last  year  in  treating 
both  broods  of  this  insect  in  the  worm  stage  with  a  form  of  nicotine  sulfate 
known  as  "Black- Leaf  40."  He  used  1  part  of  this  insecticide  to  400  parts 
water,  and  added  resin  fish-oil  soap  at  the  rate  of  2  pounds  to  50  gallons 
to  make  the  spray  spread  and  stick.  When  the  writer  saw  the  plots 
Professor  Scammell  had  treated  in  this  way,  they  were  green  and  had  a 
fair  amount  of  fruit,  whereas  the  surrounding  bog,  and  even  plots  sprayed 
with  arsenate  of  lead,  had  been  turned  brown  by  the  insect  and  bore  prac- 
tically no  crop. 

The  writer  tried  this  treatment  against  the  first  brood  on  two  large 
plots  this  season,  and  while  it  failed  to  control  the  insect  entirely,  it 
checked  it  so  much  that  the  plots  remained  green  while  the  surrounding 
bog  was  turned  rather  browm,  the  contrast  being  striking. 

This  insecticide  must  be  tested  further  before  it  can  be  said  at  what 
strength  it  should  be  used  or  how  many  times  it  should  be  applied  to  either 
brood.  At  the  strength  in  which  it  has  so  far  been  tested  it  is  a  rather 
expensive  treatment,  costing  about  %7  per  acre  per  apphcation.  It  may  be 
found,  however,  that  weaker  mixtures  suffice.  At  any  rate,  this  treatment 
stands  at  present  as  the  only  really  effective  method  of  controUing  the 
first  brood  of  this  insect,  burning  and  flooding  excepted,  and  in  spite  of  its 
expense  it  will,  therefore,  find  favor  in  the  management  of  many  bogs. 
Two,  and  perhaps  three,  applications  for  the  first  brood  are  advisable. 

>  Bui.  No.  175  of  the  New  York  State  Museum,  p.  151. 
2  Determined  by  Mr.  A.  A.  Girault  of  the  Bureau  of  Entomology. 
'  Determined  by  Mr.  J.  C.  Crawford  of  the  Bureau  of  Entomology. 

*  Smith,  J.  B.:  Insects  Injurious  in  Cranberry  Culture,  Farmers'  Bulletin  No.  178,  U.  S.  Dept, 
Agr.,  1903,  p.  19. 


REPORT   OF   CRANBERRY   SUBSTATION   FOR    1916.      227 

As  a  treatment  for  the  second  brood,  it  may  have  to  compete  with  arsenate 
of  lead,  for  there  is  danger  of  injuring  tender  foUage,  and  especially  blos- 
soms, in  spraying  with  any  contact  insecticide,  and  arsenate  of  lead  is  far 
more  effective  with  the  second  brood  than  with  the  first.  Proper  treatment 
of  the  first  brood  with  "Black-Leaf  40"  may  check  the  pest  so  well  that 
a  thorough  treatment  of  the  second  brood  will  not  be  so  necessary  as  it  is 
at  present.  In  any  case,  not  more  than  one  application  of  "Black- Leaf 
40"  for  the  second  brood  is  likely  to  be  desirable. 

The  writer  gave  some  cranberry  uprights  sprayed  with  "Black-Leaf  40" 
to  some  gypsy-moth  caterpillars,  providing  another  lot  with  unsprayed 
vines  as  a  check.  The  latter  were  eaten  much  more  freely  than  the  former. 
This  suggests  that  the  effectiveness  of  this  insecticide  may  be  partly  due 
to  a  deterrent  property. 

The  second  brood  of  the  fireworm  did  less  damage  than  usual  this  sea- 
son, and  less  than  might  have  been  expected  from  the  abundance  of  the 
first  brood.    The  wet  season  seemed  to  check  it  strongly  somehow. 

The  Cranberry  Fruit  Worm  {Mineola  vaccinii  (Riley)). 

This  insect  did  the  least  injury  this  season  of  any  year  in  the  writer's 
experience.  It  has  not  been  less  prevalent  since  1903.  We  have  no  relia- 
ble information  concerning  its  abundance  in  years  previous  to  1904. 

The  writer  has  tried  to  determine,  as  far  as  possible,  the  relative  abun- 
dance of  this  pest  in  the  various  cranberry-growing  regions.  It  is  most 
harmful  on  Cape  Cod  and  in  Wisconsin,  being  far  less  troublesome  in 
New  Jersey,  the  amount  of  injury  on  dry  bogs  (without  winter-flowage) 
in  the  latter  section,  when  the  writer  was  there  in  1915,  being  about  the 
same  as  that  on  the  flowed  bogs  of  the  Cape  in  the  same  season.  It  does 
about  the  same  damage  on  Long  Island  and  Nantucket  as  in  New  Jersey, 
being  far  less  prevalent  there  than  on  Cape  Cod.  It  appears  to  be  almost 
if  not  entirely,  unknown  on  the  Pacific  coast  of  Oregon  and  Washington. 

It  will  be  seen  that  this  insect  is  not  usually  very  troublesome  except  in 
the  regions  with  comparatively  cold  and  dry  climates,  a  heavier  total  precipi- 
tation as  well  as  a  higher  average  temperature  being  characteristic  of  the 
warmer  sections.  One  might  expect  from  this  that  any  variation  in  the  Cape 
Cod  climate  toward  that  of  the  ivarmer  regions  woidd  be  likely  to  tend  to 
reduce  the  pest,  whereas  any  variation  in  the  opposite  direction  would  be 
likely  to  lend  to  make  it  mare  abundant. 

Cape  Cod  Data  appear  to  strongly  substantiate  this  Conclusion.  —  The 
season  of  1905  was  the  worst  on  record  for  fruit-worm  injury.  The  Cape 
had  a  lower  mean  temperature  in  1904  than  in  any  subsequent  year  up  to 
the  present  time,  and  in  1905  had  a  smaller  total  precipitation  than  in  any 
year  since,  in  spite  of  the  fact  that  the  rainfall  in  all  the  last  five  months 
of  the  year  except  October  was  heavy.  Of  the  severity  of  the  winters 
1903-04  and  1904-05,  the  Annual  Summary  of  the  New  England  Section 
of  the  Climate  and  Crop  Service  of  the  Weather  Bureau  for  1905  (page  3) 
remarks  as  follows:  — 


228       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    180. 

February  —  the  last  of  the  winter  months,  with  its  remarkably  low  temperature 
record  —  completes  one  of  the  coldest  winters  of  oflficial  record.  At  Boston  the 
mean  temperature  for  the  three  months,  December,  January  and  February,  1904-05, 
24.8  degrees,  is  the  lowest  for  the  winter  months  since  1871,  excepting  24.4  degrees 
in  1903-04,  and  24.5  degrees  in  1873-74.  The  winter  for  New  England,  as  a  whole, 
was  the  coldest  since  the  establishment  of  the  weather  service  of  this  section  in 
1884.  The  mean  temperature  was  17.9  degrees,  and  the  next  lowest  is  18  degrees 
for  the  winter,  1903-04. 

As  far  as  the  "WTiter  can  determine,  the  greatest  reductions  in  fruit-worm 
activity  in  recent  years,  aside  from  that  of  this  season,  occurred  in  1906 
and  1913.  The  records  of  the  Weather  Bureau  show  that  the  total  pre- 
cipitation of  1906  on  the  Cape  was  the  greatest  of  any  year  since  1904, 
May,  June  and  July  being  especially  wet  months.  The  winter  of  1905-06 
was  mostly  an  open  one.  Both  temperature  and  precipitation  ran  abnor- 
mally high  throughout  the  greater  part  of  the  period  beginning  with 
October,  1912,  and  ending  May  1,  1913,  the  winter  being  very  open. 
As  affecting  the  abundance  of  the  pest  in  1916,  it  should  be  noted  that 
September,  1915,  was  a  month  of  record  high  temperatures  for  its  season, 
that  the  winter  1915-16  was  mostly  very  open,  and  that  the  first  half  of 
this  growing  season  was  very  wet  throughout. 

In  the  latter  part  of  May  the  WTiter  covered  large  numbers  of  fruit 
worms  in  their  cocoons,  in  quart  cans  partly  filled  with  moist  sand,  with 
different  measured  and  uniform  depths  of  sand  ranging  from  three-six- 
teenths of  an  inch  to  a  full  inch,  and  made  records  of  the  subsequent 
emergence  of  the  adult  insects.  Unfortunately,  no  check  of  worms  not 
covered  with  any  sand  was  kept  for  comparison,  but,  judging  from  the^ 
freedom  with  which  the  parasites  and  moths  emerged  through  three- six- 
teenths, one-fourth,  three-eighths,  one-half,  five-eighths,  two-thirds  and 
even  three-fourths  inch  depths,  it  appears  that  resanding  as  commonly 
done  does  not  much  affect  the  abundance  of  either  the  fruit  worm  or  its 
worm  parasites.  The  full  inch  covering  of  sand  seemed  to  smother  most 
of  the  moths  and  parasites,  though  a  few  of  both  came  out  even  from  that 
depth. 

The  writer  liberated  a  number  of  apparently  female  moths  from  a  boat 
on  a  pond  on  July  25,  and  three  of  them  were  seen  to  fly  to  the  shore,  a 
measured  distance  of  about  272  feet,  in  a  single  flight,  a  toy  balloon  being 
anchored  in  the  pond  at  their  point  of  departure  to  measure  from,  and  the 
measuring  being  done  with  twine.  This  demonstration  of  this  insect's 
powers  of  flight  is  of  interest  in  connection  with  the  speculation  concerning 
the  annual  infestation  of  bogs  from  surrounding  uplands  and  from  neigh- 
boring bogs. 

Fruit-worm  eggs  showed  a  range  in  Chalcidid  (Trichogramma  minuta) 
parasitism  of  from  about  25  to  75  per  cent,  on  diy  bogs  and  from  none  to 
about  75  per  cent,  on  those  with  winter  flowage  this  year.  This  parasite 
was  not  found  at  all  on  half  the  flowed  bogs  examined,  more  than  a  quarter 
of  the  eggs  showing  its  presence  on  only  3  out  of  30  such  bogs.    It  appeared 


REPORT   OF   CRANBERRY   SUBSTATION   FOR    1916.      229 

to  be  entirelj^  absent  on  some  flowed  bogs  on  which  it  infested  from  76  to 
89  per  cent,  of  the  eggs  in  1915.  Its  great  reduction  on  the  flowed  bogs 
ma}'  have  been  due  to  the  long  period  of  wet  weather  in  the  first  half  of 
the  groAnng  season. 

The  Braconid  (Phanerotovia  franklini  ^  Gahan)  parasitism  was  found  to 
range  from  24  to  about  55  per  cent,  on  dry  bogs  (without  winter -flowage) 
and  from  none  to  about  33  per  cent,  on  flowed  ones.  On  one  bog  which 
had  the  -ninter-flowage  held  until  May  25,  24  per  cent,  of  the  fruit  worms 
were  infested  mth  this  parasite,  and  on  another,  bared  of  the  winter  water 
on  May  14,  21  per  cent,  were  infested,  these  figures  indicating  that  moder- 
ately late  holding  of  the  flowage  perhaps  does  not  reduce  this  parasite  in 
proportion  to  its  host  as  seriously  as  was  suggested  by  the  writer  in  last 
year's  report  (page  40.)  It  should  be  stated  in  this  connection  that  the 
percentages  of  Phanerotovia  and  Pristomeridia  parasitism  given  in  this 
and  previous  reports  only  show  the  amounts  of  these  parasitisms  among 
the  worms  at  work  in  the  berries  when  the  examinations  were  made,  and 
indicate  the  parasitism  of  the  entire  season  only  in  a  very  rough  way.  It 
was  discovered  this  year  that  the  parasitized  worms  leave  the  berries 
somewhat  sooner  than  the  unparasitized  ones,  examinations  made  toward 
the  end  of  the  pest's  period  of  activity  showing  greatly  reduced  percentages 
for  the  worm  parasitism  as  compared  with  those  made  earher.  Worms 
from  the  same  location  on  one  bog  showed  percentages  of  Phanerotoma 
parasitism  on  different  dates,  as  follows:  September  3,  33.3  per  cent.; 
September  6,  40  per  cent.;  September  13,  2.3  per  cent.  The  percentages 
of  Pristomeridia  parasitism  found  in  this  same  location  were  as  follows: 
September  3,  5.5  per  cent.;  September  6,  6.6  per  cent.;  September  13,  0. 

Pristomeridia  agilis  ^  was  very  scarce  this  year,  the  percentage  of,  its 
parasitism  being  found  to  range  from  none  to  5|  on  flowed  bogs  and  from 
4^  to  about  10  on  strictly  dry  ones. 

The  examinations  by  which  the  percentages  of  Phanerotoma  and  Pristo- 
meridia parasitism  given  in  this  and  previous  reports  were  determined 
were  made  by  crushing  fruit  worms  between  glass  slides  in  such  a  way  as 
to  expel  their  viscera  through  the  anal  opening,  the  parasite  larva,  when 
present,  apparently  always  being  ejected  with  them  and  being  found 
easily  with  a  good  hand  lens. 

A  number  of  eggs  deposited  at  the  same  time  by  Phanerotoma  females 
under  observation  in  eggs  laid  by  fruit-worm  moths  in  confinement  where 
they  were  secluded  from  parasites,  and  subsequentlj''  kept  in  closed  bottles, 
were  examined  with  a  microscope  successively  at  various  times  after  depo- 
sition. None  of  these  parasite  eggs  examined  after  either  thirty-six  or 
forty-two  hours  showed  any  sign  of  hatching.  Two  of  three  examined  at 
the  end  of  forty-six  hours  had  hatched,  but  the  larvse  showed  no  sign  of 
life.    After  forty-nine  hours  all  the  eggs  had  hatched,  and  some  of  the 

1  This  parasite,  called  Phanerotoma  tibialis  in  the  writer's  previous  reports,  has  recently  been 
described  as  new  to  science,  and  given  the  name  here  used,  by  Mr.  A.  B.  Gahan  of  the  Bureau  of 
Entomology.    Cf.  Proc.  U.  S.  Nat.  Mus.,  Vol.  53,  1917,  p.  200. 

*  The  exact  identity  of  the  species  is  still  in  doubt. 


230       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    180. 

larvae  moved  their  mouth  parts  considerably.  The  weather  was  cool 
during  the  entire  period  (July  29  and  30)  in  which  this  investigation  was 
in  progress,  the  maximum  temperature  in  the  sun  at  the  station  bog 
being  80°  F.  and  the  minimum  bog  temperature  being  40°. 

Cocoons  of  parasitized  fruit  worms  are  usually  much  smaller  and  more 
delicate  than  those  of  unparasitized  ones. 

Submergence  tests  were  conducted  with  fruit  worms  in  their  cocoons, 
as  follows:  — 

1.  Six  small  cheesecloth  sacks,  each  containing  20  cocoons,  were  sub- 
merged to  a  depth  of  2  feet  in  a  pond  at  10.30  a.m.,  September  14.  They 
were  all  taken  from  the  water  and  examined  in  the  afternoon  of  September 
26,  and  all  the  worms  were  found  dead,  a  majority  of  them  being  partly 
decomposed.  Most  of  them  had  left  their  cocoons  and  were  on  the  inside 
of  the  sacks. 

2.  Three  lots  of  cocoons  of  20  each  were  submerged  in  cheesecloth  sacks 
to  a  depth  of  2  feet  in  a  pond  at  9  a.m.,  September  30.  These  were  all  taken 
from  the  water  and  examined  between  11  a.m.  and  1  p.m.,  October  12.  All 
the  worms  were  found  dead,  most  of  them  being  more  or  less  decomposed. 
About  half  had  left  their  cocoons  and  were  clinging  to  the  inside  of  the 
sacks. 

3.  Two  cheesecloth  sacks,  each  containing  20  cocoons,  were  submerged 
in  2  feet  of  water  in  a  pond  at  3  p.m.,  October  12.  These  sacks  were  taken 
out  and  examined  at  5  p.m.,  October  24.  Most  of  the  worms  were  found 
dead  and  more  or  less  decomposed,  as  in  the  previous  tests,  but  7  were 
alive  in  one  sack  and  2  in  the  other. 

4.  Two  cheesecloth  sacks,  each  containing  20  cocoons,  were  submerged 
to  a  depth  of  2  feet  in  a  pond  at  8  a.m.,  October  25.  They  were  taken  out 
and  examined  on  November  6,  17  being  found  alive  in  one  sack  and  8  in 
the  other. 

In  all  these  tests  the  sacks  were  of  the  same  material,  were  tied  up  and 
submerged  in  the  same  way,  to  the  same  depth  in  the  same  place  and  for 
practically  the  same  length  of  time.  It  will  be  seen  that  as  the  season 
advanced  the  submergence  had  much  less  effect  on  the  worms.  As  the 
pond  grew  colder  fast  while  these  tests  were  in  progress  their  results  sug- 
gested that  the  temperature  of  the  water  largely  determined  its  effect. 

At  1  p.m.,  Jan.  3,  1917,  a  weighted  cheesecloth  sack,  containing  15  fruit 
worms  in  their  cocoons,  was  placed  in  the  bottom  of  each  of  two  1-quart 
cans  full  of  water,  the  water  being  at  a  temperature  of  59^°  F.,  and  the 
cans,  with  their  covers  on  tight,  were  placed  in  a  chicken  incubator  to- 
gether with  Green  maximum  and  minimum  registering  thermometers,  the 
incubator  being  set  to  run  at  a  temperature  of  60°  F.  As  a  check  on  these 
cans,  two  similar  cans  containing  similar  lots  of  fruit  worms  were  placed 
in  a  pail  of  water  at  the  same  time,  the  temperature  of  the  water  in  the 
cans  and  in  the  pail  around  them  being  about  35°  F.  The  pail,  together 
with  maximum  and  minimum  registering  thermometers,  was  placed  in  a 
barrel  the  temperature  of  the  air  in  which  was  about  37°  F.  The  barrel 
was  headed  up  and  buried  in  hay  to  keep  its  contents  at  an  even  tempera- 


REPORT   OF   CRANBERRY   SUBSTATION   FOR    1916.      231 

ture.  The  cocoons  in  both  the  incubator  and  the  barrel  were  taken  from 
the  water  at  9  p.m.,  January  15,  and  were  examined  the  next  day  in  a  warm 
room.  All  but  9  of  the  30  worms  that  had  been  in  the  incubator  were  dead, 
whereas  all  but  3  of  the  30  from  the  pail  were  alive.  Those  taken  from  the 
pail  were  as  a  rule  very  lively  after  they  got  warmed  up,  most  of  them 
crawling  actively.  On  the  other  hand,  none  of  those  from  the  incubator 
became  active,  the  live  ones  showing  they  were  so  only  when  prodded  con- 
siderably, their  movements  even  then  being  very  sluggish.  None  of  the 
dead  worms  had  begun  to  decompose.  The  temperature  of  the  incubator 
was  shown  by  the  thermometers  to  have  ranged  from  52°  to  66°  F.  during 
the  test.  The  temperature  of  the  water  in  the  cans  kept  in  it  was  57°  F. 
at  the  end  of  the  test,  and  had  probably  averaged  a  little  under  60°.  The 
temperature  in  the  barrel  had  ranged  from  31°  to  39^°  F.,  that  of  the 
water  in  the  pail  being  35°  at  the  end  of  the  test. 

This  incubator  and  pail  experiment  was  duplicated  by  a  test  carried  out 
similarly  in  all  details,  except  that  vaseline  bottles  of  3^-ounce  capacity, 
with  tightly  inserted  cork  stoppers,  were  used  instead  of  the  cans,  the 
cocoons  being  submerged  at  noon,  Jan.  29,  1917,  and  being  taken  from 
the  water  at  3  p.m.,  February  13.  Of  the  30  worms  kept  in  the  incubator 
16  were  dead  and  14  aHve  at  the  end  of  the  test,  while  of  the  30  tested  in 
the  pail  27  were  alive  and  only  3  dead.  Moreover,  the  live  worms  fromi 
the  bottles  in  the  pail  were  much  more  active  after  they  got  warmed  up> 
than  were  those  from  the  incubator.  None  of  the  dead  worms  had  begun 
to  decompose  noticeably.  In  this  test  the  temperature  in  the  barrel  ranged! 
from  32°  to  36°  F.  The  incubator  got  out  of  order  twice,  —  on  the  seventhi 
and  tenth  days  of  the  test,  —  its  temperature  the  first  time  falling  to  40° 
and  the  second  to  33°  F.  With  these  exceptions  it  ran  between  52°  and. 
62°,  and  probably  averaged  about  56°. 

Many  of  the  cocoons  used  in  these  tests  were  carefully  opened  under- 
water at  the  end  of  the  submergence,  and,  while  they  were  all  found  to  be 
largely  filled  with  water,  none  were  without  a  little  air  or  gas,  this  indi- 
cating that  the  findings  in  this  regard  previously  reported  by  the  writer  ^ 
were  not  quite  accurate,  the  former  examinations  apparently  not  having 
been  sufficiently  careful. 

The  results  of  these  experiments  seem  to  prove  that  the  effect  of  sub- 
mergence of  the  worms  in  their  cocoons  depends  largely,  if  not  principally, 
upon  the  temperature  of  the  water,  and  they  suggest  that  a  flowage  after 
picking,  if  it  is  begun  before  October  1  and  continued  for  twelve  or  possibly 
even  ten  days,  may  control  this  insect  as  well  as  late  holding  of  the  winter- 
flowage  usually  does.  It  may  be  said  that  such  a  flooding  would  interfere 
with  harvesting,  but  as  late  picking  is  usually  a  result  of  late  holding  of  the 
previous  winter-flowage,  and  as  late  holding  is  most  commonly  practiced 
as  a  treatment  for  the  fruit  worm,  this  objection  does  not  seem  valid. 
Flooding  practiced  annually  after  picking  would  probably  have  a  much 
less  harmful  effect  on  a  bog  than  late  holding  of  the  winter-flowage  every 
year  has. 

»  Bui.  No.  160,  Mass.  Agr.  Expt.  Sta.,  1915,  p.  113. 


232       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    180. 


Bog  Management. 

Prof.  H.  B.  Scammell  has  recently  reported  '  a  destructive  visitation  of 
the  fall  army  worm  (Laphygma  jrugi-perda  S.  &  A.)  this  year  on  widely 
separated  cranberry  bogs  in  New  Jersey  following  closely,  and  evidently 
somehow  caused  by,  the  removal  of  the  winter-flowage  in  mid-July.  This 
insect  feeds  on  a  variety  of  plants,  but  has  not  heretofore  been  known  as  a 
cranberry  pest.  As  its  frequent  outbreaks,  which  start  in  the  southern 
States,  sometimes  reach  as  far  north  as  Canada,  by  the  spreading  of  the 
successive  broods  of  strong-flying  moths,  in  a  single  season,  though  it  is 
unable  to  endure  the  winter  in  the  north,  there  is  gi'ound  for  fearing  that 
midsummer  removal  of  the  winter-flowage  may  more  or  less  regularly 
invite  serious  trouble  from  this  insect  on  Cape  Cod  as  well  as  in  New  Jer- 
sey. This  unexpected  development  must  be  regarded  as  a  possible  com- 
plication in  connection  with  certain  phases  of  the  biennial  cropping  system 
suggested  by  the  writer  in  last  year's  report  (page  46). 

Late  holding  of  a  deep  winter-flowage  is  sometimes  dangerous.  This 
flowage  was  started  off  from  a  bog  in  Assonet,  Mass.,  on  June  10,  its  with- 
drawal being  completed  on  the  11th.  When  the  writer  visited  this  bog  on 
June  30  the  vines  seemed  completely  dead  where  the  flowage  had  been 
deepest  (5  feet  deep),  whereas  they  showed  no  injury,  aside  from  the  re- 
tarded seasonal  development  of  growth,  where  the  water  had  been  shal- 
lowest (2  feet  deep),  their  leaves  having  been  well  retained  and  appearing 
green  and  healthy.  Where  the  water  had  been  deepest  the  leaves  were  all 
off,  the  buds  at  the  tips  of  the  uprights  were  gone,  and  the  vines  were 
brittle  and  showed  no  green  in  the  break  when  broken  off.  There  was  a 
complete  gradation  from  this  condition  to  that  where  the  flowage  had  been 
shallowest,  corresponding  with  the  variation  in  elevation. 

Part  of  the  vines  on  this  bog  were  set  out  in  the  spring  of  1914,  and  part 
in  the  spring  of  1915,  strips  of  both  plantings  running  from  the  lowest  to 
the  highest  parts  of  the  bog.  The  writer  is  informed  by  the  manager  that 
the  one-year  sets  where  the  flowage  was  deep  finally  recovered  somewhat, 
but  that  the  two-year  plantings  were  killed  entirely. 

A  large  bog  in  Rochester,  Mass.,  the  winter-flowage  of  which  ranged  in 
depth  from  4  feet  to  nothing,  had  this  flowage  held  until  May  31  this  sea- 
son. This  is  an  old  bog,  with  vines  well  established.  Where  the  water  was 
deepest  the  leaves  all  came  off,  leaving  the  uprights  alive  but  bearing  only 
the  terminal  bud.  On  the  other  hand,  there  was  no  abnormal  falling  of 
the  leaves  where  the  water  was  shallow.  As  on  the  Assonet  bog,  there  was 
a  complete  gradation  in  the  injury  corresponding  with  the  variation  in  the 
depth  of  the  flowage. 

A  new  60-acre  bog  at  Assonet,  Mass.,  was  flowed  on  the  night  of  May  31, 
the  vines  being  completely  submerged  for  forty-eight  hours,  the  water 
ranging  from  3  feet  to  a  few  inches  in  depth,  and  averaging  about  2|  feet. 

»  Proc.  47th  Ann.  Meet,  of  the  Amer.  Cranb.  Grow.  Assoc,  p.  11,  January,  1917. 


REPORT   OF   CRANBERRY   SUBSTATION   FOR    1916.      233 

The  flooding  and  draining  were  done  entirely  at  night.  A  few  days  later 
the  writer's  attention  was  called  to  an  injury  that  had  resulted.  He 
visited  the  bog  and  found  the  buds  and  even  the  tops  of  the  new  growth  of 
the  uprights  on  parts  of  it  seriously  hurt.  The  injury  was  mainly  on  the 
central  portion  of  the  bog,  and  centered  around  a  large  pile  of  ashes  left 
from  the  burning  of  stumps  and  brush  when  it  was  built.  Vines  at  con- 
siderable distances  from  this  pile  showed  at  most  but  slight  injury,  except 
in  a  streak  parallel  to  the  end  of  the  dike  toward  which  the  wind  had  blown 
during  the  flooding.  Leaves  of  bushes  which  had  hung  down  into  or  stood 
in  the  water  of  the  reflow,  around  the  margin  of  the  bog,  showed  a  marked 
and  unusual  burning  injury,  and  they  bore  traces  of  a  white  powder  which 
appeared  to  be  ash  that  had  floated  in  the  water  from  the  pile  at  the  cen- 
ter of  the  bog.  The  situation  as  a  whole  led  all  those  who  observed  it  to 
conclude  that  the  ash  pile  had  caused  the  trouble.  The  pile  was  estimated 
to  be  2^  feet  deep  over  an  area  25  feet  square  and  about  6  inches  deep  over 
another  area  75  feet  square.  Piles  of  ashes  on  bogs  are  probably  danger- 
ous because  of  the  lye  leached  from  them.  Many  unaccountable  spots 
where  vines  refuse  to  grow  thriftily  on  bogs  may  be  the  result  of  effects 
remaining  from  ashes  left  from  the  burning  of  brush  piles.  It  is  well  known 
that  alkalies  in  the  soil  are  inimical  to  cranberry  growth. 

A  portable  sectional  bridge  devised  by  the  writer  for  use  in  carting  ber- 
ries across  bog  ditches  proved  valuable  at  the  station  bog  this  year.  With 
its  help  it  was  easy  to  cart  berries  without  killing  the  vines  in  tracks  by 
repeated  passages  of  the  wheels  over  the  same  ground.  A  light  truck 
probably  could  be  used  to  great  advantage  with  this  bridge,  though  the 
writer  has  tried  only  a  horse  and  wagon  with  it  so  far.  At  any  rate,  it  will 
make  it  possible  to  much  reduce  the  present  expense  of  removing  berries 
from  bogs.  It  may  be  seen  at  the  station  bog  at  any  time  during  the  cran- 
berry season. 

With  many  Cape  Cod  bogs  a  desirable  reduction  in  the  cost  of  resanding 
could  probably  be  effected  by  the  development  of  a  sanding  rim  around  the 
margin. '  With  such  a  rim  the  sand  for  any  part  of  the  bog  could  always 
be  brought  from  the  nearest  point.  The  rim  should  be  wide  enough  for  a 
good  roadway,  and  it  should  be  built  level  with  the  bog  surface,  so  that 
it  may  serve  as  a  sanitary  catch-basin  for  floating  berries  and  leaves.  If, 
as  the  results  of  some  of  the  writer's  storage  ex-periments  seem  to  indicate, 
the  berries  from  the  marginal  portion  of  a  bog,  other  conditions  being  the 
same,  are  usually  of  poorer  keeping  quality  than  those  from  the  center, 
the  condition  may  naturally  be  laid  to  the  continual  deposition  of  diseased 
cranberry  material  floating  on  the  surface  of  repeated  flowages  and  wafted 
to  the  margin  by  the  wind.  Thus  the  possible  value  of  a  marginal  catch- 
basin  as  suggested  becomes  evident.  The  sanding  rim  would  also  have 
some  value  as  fire  protection  for  a  bog. 

As  the  sanding  rim  becomes  sufficiently  widened  by  the  removal  of 
sand  in  repeated  resandings,  the  bog  can  be  gradually  enlarged  by  planting 


234       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    180. 

on  the  inner  side  of  the  rim,  this  increase  in  property  being  mostly  clear 
gain. 

The  sanding  rim  can  be  constructed  most  advantageously  when  a 
bog  is  built.  Its  development  after  the,  bog  is  planted  is  attended  with 
some  difficulties.  Among  these  the  extra  cost  of  turfing  the  upland  adja- 
cent to  the  bog,  and  the  liability  in  resanding  of  seeding  the  bog  more  or 
less  with  certain  troublesome  weeds,  should  be  especially  considered. 


OBSERVATIONS  ON  THE  SPOILAGE  OF  CRAN- 
BERRIES DUE  TO  LACK  OF  PROPER 
VENTILATION. 


by  c.  l.  shear  and  neil  e.  stevens,  pathologists,  and  b.  a.  rudolph, 
scientific  assistant,  fruit-disease  investigations,  bureau  of 
plant  industry.  

Introduction. 

The  injuryto  cranberries  due  to  keeping  them  in  tightly  closed  packages 
was  brought  strikingly  to  the  writers'  attention  during  temperature  tests 
conducted  in  the  fall  of  1916.  Uniform  samples  of  Early  Black  cranberries 
from  bogs  near  Wareham,  Mass.,  were  put  up  in  pound  coffee  cans  and  sent 
to  Washington  by  mail.  There  they  were  placed  in  the  constant  tempera- 
ture apparatus  used  by  Drs.  Brooks  and  Cooley  of  this  office,  and  described 
by  them  in  their  recent  paper. ^ 

One  can  from  each  lot  was  placed  at  each  of  the  following  temperatures: 
Centigrade,  0,  5,  10,  15  and  20  degrees  (equal  to  32,  41,  50,  59  and  68  de- 
grees Fahrenheit).  They  were  kept  at  these  temperatures  from  early  in 
September  until  about  the  middle  of  November.  When  the  berries  were 
removed  from  the  cans  and  sorted,  it  was  found  that  spoilage  at  the  lower 
temperatures  had  been  much  greater  than  the  previous  experience  of  the 
writers  had  led  them  to  beHeve  could  be  due  to  fungi  alone.  Many  of 
the  spoiled  berries  had  a  peculiar  lusterless  appearance,  and  were  of  a 
uniform  dull  red  color  differing  both  from  normal  and  from  typical 
rotten  berries. 

Among  various  factors  considered  as  possible  causes  of  this  condition 
the  excessive  accumulation  of  carbon  dioxide  seemed  the  most  probable. 
The  work  of  F.  W.  Morse,^  Gore  '  and  others  has  proven  that  large  amounts 
of  this  gas  are  given  off  in  the  respiration  of  various  fruits,  while  the  studies 
of  Fulton  *  indicate  that  the  spoiling  of  strawberries  and  raspberries  which 
he  noted  in  tight  packages  is  due  to  the  accumulation  of  carbon  dioxide. 
Fulton  foimd  that  if  strawberries  were  kept  in  tightly  closed  bottles  for 

1  Brooks,  Charles,  and  Cooley,  J.  S.:  Temperature  Relations  of  Apple-rot  Fungi.  Journal  of 
Agricultural  Research,  8,  139-163,  1917. 

'  Morse,  Fred  W.:  Effect  of  Temperature  on  the  Respiration  of  Apples.  Jour.  Amer.  Chem. 
Soc,  30,  876-881,  1908. 

'  Gore,  H.  C:  Studies  on  Fruit  Respiration,  U.  S.  Dept.  Agr.,  Bur.  of  Chem.,  Bui.  No.  142, 
1911. 

*  Fulton,  S.  H.:  The  Cold  Storage  of  Small  Fruits,  U.  S.  Dept.  Agr.,  Bur.  of  Plant  Indus., 
Bui.  No.  108,  1907. 


236       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    180. 

three  days  the  oxygen  of  the  air  was  practically  exhausted,  and  more  than 
35  per  cent,  by  volume  of  carbon  dioxide  had  accumulated.  Under  these 
conditions,  as  well  as  in  cartons  tightly  wrapped,  "The  fruit  softened  and 
had  the  characteristic  bad  flavor  of  fruit  confined  in  an  atmosphere  of 
carbon  dioxide"  (3,  p.  22). 

Dr.  Charles  Brooks  and  Dr.  E.  M.  Harvey  of  this  ofl&ce,  who  have  sepa- 
rately studied  storage  conditions  in  apples  and  other  fruits,  examined  the 
cranberries  referred  to  and  were  of  the  opinion  that  the  condition  might 
very  likely  be  due  to  the  accumulation  of  an  excessive  amount  of  carbon 
dioxide.  Although  it  was  then  too  late  in  the  season  (November  20)  to 
undertake  a  thorough  investigation  of  the  subject,  preliminary  tests  were 
made  which  gave  results  of  considerable  interest. 

Temperature  Tests  in  Open  and  Closed  Cans. 

In  order  to  compare  directly  the  keeping  of  cranberries  in  open  and 
closed  cans,  uniform  lots  of  sound  berries  were  divided,  one  portion  being 
placed  in  tightly  closed  cans,  and  the  other  portion  in  similar  cans  with  the 
covers  removed.  The  result  of  one  of  these  tests,  which  is  typical  of  sev- 
eral, is  given  in  the  following  tables :  — 

Temperature  Tests  on  Howes  from  State  Bog,  Massachusetts,  beginning 

November  21,  ending  December  16. 

Closed  Cans. 


Tempebatuhb  in  Degrees  C. 


Sound. 


Spoiled. 


Spoiled 
(Per  Cent.). 


20. 

15, 

10, 

5. 

0, 


328 
357 

444 
472 
483 


172 
147 
67 
29 
20 


34.5 

29.5 
13.0 
6.5 
4.0 


Open  Cans. 


20, 

15, 

10, 

S, 

0, 


It  will  be  noted  that  in  all  cases  the  amount  of  spoilage  is  greater  in  the 
closed  cans  than  in  the  open  cans. 


REPORT   OF   CRANBERRY    SUBSTATION   FOR    1916.      237 


Effect  of  Carbon  Dioxide  on  Cranberries. 

Several  series  of  tests  were  made  in  which  cranberries  from  various 
sources  (Early  Blacks  and  Howes  from  Massachusetts,  and  Howes  from 
New  Jersey)  were  kept  for  short  periods  in  an  atmosphere  of  nearly  pure 
carbon  dioxide.  It  was  noticed  in  each  case  that  at  the  end  of  three  days 
practically  a]]  the  berries  in  the  carbon  dioxide  were  spoiled,  whereas  ber- 
ries from  the  same  lots  kept  in  similar  containers  with  air  showed  very 
little  rot  even  at  the  end  of  two  weeks. 

The  berries  which  had  been  kept  in  an  atmosphere  of  carbon  dioxide 
had  the  peculiar  uniform  duU,  lusterless,  red  color  which  had  been  noticed 
in  many  of  the  berries  which  had  spoiled  in  closed  cans.  On  sectioning 
these  berries  it  was  found  that  the  tissue  of  the  berry,  which  is  white  in  a 
normal  berry,  had  taken  on  the  same  uniform  red  color.  Berries  which 
have  been  treated  in  this  manner  have  a  peculiar,  bitter  taste,  which  is  very 
characteristic.  They  are  no  longer  firm,  as  in  the  sound  fruit,  nor  elastic 
to  the  touch  as  in  rotten  fruit,  but  have  become  flaccid.  The  same  effect 
on  the  berries  was  readily  produced  by  sealing  up  a  quantity  in  an  air- 
tight container,  and  allowing  them  to  remain  at  room  temperature  for  a 
week. 

That  this  injurious  effect  is  produced  by  the  accumulation  of  carbon 
dioxide  is  indicated  by  preliminary  tests  made  in  December,  1916.  Equal 
quantities  of  sound  Early  Blacks  or  Howes  were  put  in  similar  containers 
(Hempel  desiccators).  One  of  these  desiccators  was  filled  with  carbon 
dioxide,  the  other  two  contained  air,  but  the  upper  portion  of  one  of  them 
was  filled  with  a  saturated  solution  of  potassium  hydroxide,  which  would 
absorb  the  carbon  dioxide  almost  as  fast  as  given  off  by  the  berries.  The 
berries  in  the  fii'st  lot  were  thus  exposed  to  an  atmosphere  of  carbon 
dioxide  throughout  the  test;  those  in  the  second  lot  were  exposed  to  air 
containing  practically  no  carbon  dioxide;  and  those  in  the  third  to  an  at- 
mosphere in  which  the  carbon  dioxide  given  off  in  respiration  was  allowed 
to  accumulate.  The  results  of  one  of  these  tests  which  was  typical  of  all 
are  given  in  the  following  table :  — 


Conditions  under  which  Berries 

Condition  of  Berries  at  End  op  Test. 

WERE   KEPT. 

Sound. 

Spoiled. 

Spoiled 
(Per  Cent.). 

C02 

Air  exposed  to  water, 

Air  exposed  to  KOH  solution, 

35 
56 
45 

34 
39 
19 

60 
40 
29 

It  will  be  noted  that  the  amount  of  spoilage,  including  rot  due  to  fungi, 
is  greatest  in  the  berries  exposed  to  carbon  dioxide  and  least  in  the  con- 
tainer from  which  this  gas  was  removed,  which  apparently  indicates  that  a 
large  portion  of  the  spoilage  was  due  to  the  carbon  dioxide. 


238       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    180. 


Effect   of   Different   relative   Humidities   on   Spoilage   due   to 
Carbon  Dioxide. 

Most  of  the  tests  described  above  had  been  made  in  atmospheres  having 
relatively  high  moisture  content.  In  order  to  determine  whether  the  hu- 
midity of  the  air  in  any  way  influenced  the  spoilage,  a  series  of  tests  was 
run  in  which  sound  cranberries  of  the  Howes  variety  were  kept  in  tightly 
sealed  Hempel  desiccators  which  were  maintained  at  constant  humidity 
by  sulfuric  acid  solutions  of  different  densities.  This  method  has  been 
described  by  one  of  the  writers  in  an  earlier  paper.^  AU  these  tests  were 
made  at  a  temperature  of  about  24°  C. 

Chambers  having  relative  humidities  of  100  per  cent,  (saturated  atmos- 
phere), 75  per  cent.,  50  per  cent.,  25  per  cent,  and  approximately  0  per 
cent,  were  used,  and  so  far  as  could  be  detected  by  careful  observation 
there  was  no  difference  in  the  rate  of  spoilage  at  the  different  humidities. 

Relation  of  Fungi  to  Spoilage  due  to  Carbon  Dioxide. 

It  is  of  course  possible  that  one  effect  of  accumulation  of  carbon  diox  j 
at  least  in  small  amounts,  may  be  to  make  the  berries  more  susceptible  to 
the  attacks  of  fungi.    It  seems  certain,  however,  that  the  injury  to  the  fruit 
is  in  many  cases  wholly  independent  of  the  action  of  fungi. 

On  March  13,  1917,  we  received  from  Dr.  Franklin  a  box  of  Pride  cran- 
berries taken  from  a  crate  of  fruit  which  had  been  kept  in  storage  in  the 
basement  of  the  screenhouse  at  the  State  experimental  bog  at  East  Ware- 
ham.  These  were  taken  to  represent  the  average  condition  of  the  spoiled 
fruit  at  the  time.  This  lot  contained  271  berries.  They  were  carefully 
sorted,  and  195  were  somewhat  softened  and  flaccid,  having  much  less  resil- 
iency than  the  rotten  fruit,  in  which  the  tissues  are  more  or  less  destroyed 
by  the  growth  of  fungi.  They  had  the  same  general  appearance  as  berries 
treated  with  carbon  dioxide,  and  their  condition  was  believed  to  be  due 
to  the  time  and  manner  in  which  they  had  been  kept  rather  than  to  fungous 
disease.  Fifty  of  these  berries  were  taken  at  random  and  cultures  made  by 
transplanting  the  bulk  of  the  pulp  from  the  cranberries,  the  skin  being  re- 
moved. Of  these  cultures,  but  2,  or  4  per  cent.,  produced  fungi.  Assum- 
ing that  this  represents  the  average  number  affected  with  fungous  disease, 
deducting  4  per  cent,  from  the  total,  195,  would  leave  187  presumably 
free  from  fungous  disease.  Cultures  were  also  made  from  the  tissue  of  the 
remaining  76,  which  had  more  the  appearance  and  character  of  fruit  at- 
tacked b}^  fungi.  The  results  of  these  cultures  showed,  however,  that  49 
of  these  berries  were  apparently  destroyed  by  some  other  cause  than  fun- 
gous disease,  thus  making  a  total  of  236  out  of  271,  or  87  per  cent.,  not 
destroyed  by  fungi  but  presumably  by  the  period  and  conditions  of 
storage  since  picking. 

'  Stevens,  Neil  E.:  A  Method  for  studying  the  Humidity  Relations  of  Fungi  in  Culture. 
Phytopathology,  6,  428^32,  1916. 


REPORT   OF   CRANBERRY   SUBSTATION   FOR    1916.      239 

From  a  sample  of  cranberries  of  the  cherry  variety  taken  July  2,  1917, 
at  Madrid,  Me.,  which  had  been  kept  in  the  cellar  of  a  house  all  winter, 
50  softened  berries  were  chosen  at  random  and  cultures  were  made  from 
their  pulp,  as  described  above.  Twenty  of  these  berries,  or  40  per  cent., 
jielded  the  end-rot  fungus,  while  22  berries,  or  44  per  cent.,  showed  no 
fungi,  and  were  presumably  destroyed  by  the  other  causes  discussed  in 
this  paper. 

Effect  of  Carbon  Dioxide  on  Fungi  in  the  Berries. 

That  carbon  dioxide  in  high  concentrations  injures  fungi  in  the  cran- 
berries as  well  as  the  berries  themselves  is  indicated  by  a  test  in  which  equal 
numbers  of  rotten  cranberries  from  a  single  lot  were  placed  in  similar  ves- 
sels, one  of  which  was  filled  with  carbon  dioxide  and  the  other  left  open. 
At  the  end  of  one  week  transfers  of  tissue  were  made  from  each  berry.  Of 
the  berries  which  had  been  kept  in  an  atmosphere  of  carbon  dioxide  70 
per  cent,  contained  no  viable  fungi  and  the  others  yielded  Penicillium,  or 
the  end-rot  fungus.  Of  the  berries  kept  in  the  open  vessel  only  15  per 
cent,  contained  no  living  fungi,  and  the  others  yielded  fungi  of  six  different 
species. 

The  rate  at  which  carbon  dioxide  is  given  off  by  cranberries  in  storage 
and  the  variation  of  this  rate  with  temperature,  the  concentration  of  the 
gas  necessary  to  cause  injury,  and  the  concentration  which  occurs  under 
storage  conditions,  have  not  been  determined,  and  further  investigations 
on  this  line  are  planned.  It  seems  very  probable  from  the  facts  now  in 
hand,  however,  that  this  spoilage  is  a  considerable  factor  in  the  loss  during 
storage,  and  throws  new  light  on  the  results  of  Dr.  Franklin,  ^  which  indi- 
cate the  importance  of  ventilation,  as  well  as  on  this  year's  results  in 
shipping  cranberries  in  tight  as  compared  with  ventilated  packages. 

1  Franklin,  H.  J.:  Report  of  Cranberry  Substation  for  1915,  Mass.  Agr.  Expt.  Sta.,  Bui.  No. 
168,  1916. 


BULLETIN   No.    181, 


DEPARTMENT  OF   CHEMISTRY. 


DIGESTION  EXPERIMENTS  WITH  SHEEP. 


J.   B,   LINDSEY,    C.   L.   BEALS   AND   P.   H.   SMITH.' 


Introduction, 


The  digestion  experiments  reported  in  this  bulletin  were  made  during 
a  number  of  years,  beginning  with  the  autumn  of  1912.  They  include 
portions  of  Series  XVIII.  and  XIX.  and  all  of  Series  XX.,  XXI.  and  XXII., 
with  the  exception  of  one  experiment  in  Series  XXII.  Each  series  in- 
cludes a  period  of  time  between  the  early  autumn  and  the  following  spring. 
A  few  of  the  results  have  been  given  in  other  publications. 

The  basal  ration  in  the  majority  of  cases  was  English  hay,  or  English 
hay  and  gluten  feed. 

The  usual  method  of  conducting  the  tests  was  employed,  and  has  been 
fully  described  elsewhere.  ^ 

The  composition  of  the  feeds  tested  in  the  several  series  is  presented  in 
the  tabulation  known  as  Table  I.,  which  is  arranged  alphabetically. 

Table  II.  is  arranged  by  series,  beginning  with  Series  XVIII.  It  con- 
tains the  average  amount  of  feces  excreted  daily  by  each  sheep,  the  weight 
of  one-tenth  of  the  feces  in  air-dry  condition,  the  percentage  of  dry  mat- 
ter in  the  air-dry  feces,  and  the  composition  of  the  dry  matter. 

Table  III.  contains  the  weight  of  the  animals  at  the  beginning  and  end 
of  each  digestion  period,  and  the  average  amount  of  water  consumed  daily. 

In  Table  IV.  will  be  found  the  digestion  coefficients  of  basal  rations  used 
in  the  computations  which  follow  in  Table  V.  This  table,  headed  "Com- 
putation of  Digestion  Coefficients,"  presents  the  detailed  data  of  each 
trial,  together  with  the  resulting  coefficients.  Following  the  complete 
data  will  be  found  a  summary  of  the  coefficients  secured  for  each  material, 
together  with  a  discussion  of  the  results. 

Table  VI.  gives  an  average  of  the  coefficients  secured  for  each  feed 
tested. 

It  may  be  stated  that  the  period  in  nearly  all  cases  extended  over  four- 
teen days,  the  first  seven  of  which  were  preliminary,  the  collecting  of  the 
feces  being  made  on  the  last  seven.  Ten  grams  of  salt  were  fed  each  sheep 
dailj^  and  water  ad  libitum.  The  sheep  were  grade  Shropshires,  as  nearly 
as  possible  of  the  same  age  and  weight. 

1  Mr.  Smith  and  Mr.  Beak  did  the  larger  part  of  the  analytical  work  and  the  tabulations;  the 
work  at  the  feeding  barn  was  carried  out  by  Mr.  J.  R.  Alcock. 

2  Eleventh  report  of  the  Mass.  State  Agri.  Exp.  Sta.,  pp.  146-149  (1893). 


242       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN   181. 


U 
K 


P 

E-i 
cc 
Q 

W 
P^ 

O 

;< 

o 

CO 

o 

PL, 

o 
O 


o 

o 

■<f 

00 

s 

f 

03 

o> 

■o< 

o 

o 

C-4 

TT 

■* 

t^ 

<M 

<M 

«n 

o> 

CO 

■<)< 

eo 

•* 

TJ< 

0           -4^ 

■tf,"^   X 

to 

lO 

m 

t^ 

to 

■<»> 

Z    W 

to 

P5 

K 

ui 

Ol 

^ 

(M 

_ 

o 

o 

o 

C-) 

t^ 

H 

S 

■^ 

CO 

C^J 

t^ 

^ 

f^ 

CO 

'  ^ 

-^ 

^ 

CO 

d 

^ 

,_t 

00 

00 

OS 

00 

<; 

(:^ 

CO 

cc 

1—1 

'— ' 

--« 

•— ' 

s 

£ 

Q 

C 

r-y 

-1 

^ 

in 

o 

CO 

•* 

to 

eo 

■* 

o 

m 

00 

05 

to 

CO 

£ 

N 

O 

to 

o 

o 

in 

>» 

o 

w 

^^ 

in 

CO 

00 

oo 

CO 

OO 

CO 

'— ' 

<^ 

o 

to 

00 

•* 

C4 

00 

o 

OS 

,^ 

,_H 

IM 

,—1 

,_, 

,_, 

(M 

>>B 

to 

to 

1^ 

t^ 

p| 

•53  0 

^ 

05 

o 

05 

(-> 

CO 

Oi 

en 

00 

00 

00 

a 

•p^ 

■"^ 

H 

03 

fi) 

3 

fe 

o 
c 

3 
O 

■a 

o 

C 
o 

s 

f 

2 

1 

c 

1 

'3 

.^ 

01 

ft 

U) 

&^ 

13 

"w 

-a 

-c 

c 

o 

o 

C3 

i" 

5 

C3 

i 

^ 

C3 

-2 

O) 

-2 

iJ 

© 

B 

c 

c 

c 

s 

13 

o 

2 

2 

a 

13 

•5 

■■5 

u 

3 

3 

3 

3 

-t; 

< 

u 

u 

o 

U 

u 

o 

o 

u 

p 

(-1 

t. 

O 

o 

O 

O 

. 

o 

K5 

00 

00 

CI 

CO 

t^ 

in 

•<»■ 

•o 

CI 

p^ 

j_; 

^ 

^• 

,_• 

X 

X 

y. 

X 

;^' 

><! 

p 

^" 

>i 

« 

>< 

X 

t< 

(— H 

« 

>-» 

> 

« 

X 

>^ 

'y, 

« 

><! 

i< 

'y. 

M 

X 

f^ 

cc 

>< 

X 

DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH   SHEEP. 


243 


C» 

CO 

CO 

CO 

Oi 

CO 

o 

•V 

•^ 

1~ 

*^ 

TJ' 

■* 

•>»< 

■* 

■* 

■* 

e<i 

(M 

CO 

c^ 

CO 

CO 

CO 

r^ 

'-^ 

CO 

CO 

o 

c^ 

l^ 

•— " 

(^ 

Ci 

_^ 

C5 

lo 

>o 

•o 

•o 

o 

•o 

-<t* 

■»t* 

•^ 

r^ 

CO 

CO 

CO 

00 

IC 

c^ 

•* 

'— ' 

CO 

00 

00 

00 

w 

00 

00 

00 

t^ 

t~ 

t^ 

CO 

M 

CO 

n 

m 

" 

Oi 

C5 

r^ 

Ol 

»o 

•«*« 

•— " 

o 

00 

^^ 

^ 

1^ 

t^ 

00 

1^ 

^ 

o 

<M 

c^ 

■o< 

■^ 

■* 

■^ 

■^ 

CO 

o 

05 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

M 

CO 

oo 

o 

c^ 

^- 

•-' 

CO 

•* 

•^ 

CO 

■^ 

'— ' 

CO 

>o 

c^ 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

lO 

o 

>o 

CO 

CO 

^ 

CO 

o 

•^ 

o 

LO 

o 

t^ 

1^ 

^H 

^^ 

^H 

^H 

_ 

^H 

,-H 

^H 

■^ 

_l 

_ 

Ci 

o 

C5 

Ci 

00 

oo 

00 

'^ 

-o 

-73 

■a 

73 

■v 

C 

c 

a 

a 

a 

a 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

s 

a 

e 

a 

fi 

a 

ct 

c! 

a 

« 

8 

tt 

0 

p 

tt 

2 

s 

s 

^ 

-r; 

r^ 

•n 

Tl 

T! 

•c 

Tl 

-^ 

Xl 

TJ 

"0 

■73 

OJ 

cS 

C3 

cfl 

rt 

ci 

.2 

.2 

.22 

.2 

a 

bd 
C 

a 

a 

•2 

o 

0) 

•2 

>2 

tt) 

« 

>2 

(U 

.2 

ti 

ti 

a 

G 

6 

s 

a 

c 

C 

e 

c 

a 

c 

c 

a 

fi 

a 

a 

S 

a 

a 

a 

a 

a 

W 

W 

fei 

(i 

^ 

>. 

>> 

>> 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

O 

O 

a 

a 

a 

o 

a 

O 

O 

o 

a 

O 

O 

a 

O 

O 

O 

O 

K 

K 

M 

K 

CO 

■I' 

>o 

o 

= 

CO 

■rt* 

- 

CO 

CO 

- 

2 

o 

- 

2 

lO 

CO 

t^ 

CO 

^ 

o 

CO 

X.    XI    k^    ^-1 


244       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN   181. 


K 


t3 

H 
H 

O 

z 
o 


o 

o 


o 

oo 

o 

c3 

to 

c^ 

<M 

^J* 

-^ 

C<J 

CO 

CO 

CM 

to 

CM 

lO 

•— < 

(M 

M 

(M 

CJ 

CO 

CO 

M 

i      *J 

lO 

CO 

00 

o 

o 

o 

ira 

t^ 

-* 

o 

CM 

a 

00 

>f3 

t'" 

•^ 

_, 

,_, 

^, 

c:> 

_ 

CM 

CM 

^^ 

,^ 

^^ 

,_, 

_, 

U5 

o 

>o 

>o 

115 

ira 

■* 

•o 

o 

lO 

m 

lO 

»o 

o 

lO 

g    w 

< 

fQ 

« 

ij 

(^ 

o 

■* 

oo 

o 

■* 

CO 

CO 

M 

f^ 

to 

CO 

oo 

o 

o 

o 

H 

«( 

fe 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

s 

12 

P 

C3 

IM 

<M 

tn 

CO 

CO 

o 

to 

CO 

CM 

.M 

CO 

rv, 

^" 

t-- 

t^ 

t^ 

00 

t~ 

t^ 

CO 

o 

CO 

CO 

lO 

to 

CO 

to 

to 

•o 

-S 

oo 

Wl 

t^ 

o 

t^ 

o 

< 

to 

«o 

>o 

o 

U5 

lO 

lO 

UO 

in> 

U5 

lO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

w 

to 

CD 

fc.       ? 

b-2«^*^ 

r* 

N 

o 

tfi 

a> 

00 

t~ 

QC 

00 

00 

00 

oo 

oo 

oo 

00 

00 

CO 

a 

K) 

H 

fe 

S 

2 

x 

s 

3 

2 

3 

la 

2 

2 

2 

3 

J3 

2 

2 

s 

.a 

■Ji 

;S 

.a 

s 

.a 

3 

.a 

■Ji 

.a 

.a 

.a 

.a 

.a 

.3 

."J 

to 

bO 

bO 

U) 

bD 

bO 

hfl 

a 

a 

a 

13 

d 

a 

a 

a 

13 

a 

a 

a 

a 

a 

ti 

& 

y 

a 

y 

& 

ti 

& 

a 

H 

^ 

s 

& 

e. 

w 

B 

e 

>. 

^ 

>. 

>. 

>. 

>. 

>, 

>> 

>> 

>. 

>, 

>, 

>. 

>. 

>, 

>, 

>t 

0) 

a 

(8 

(II 

St 

ea 

01 

01 

si 

01 

Bl 

C3 

cS 

<fl 

(H 

rt 

a 

w 

« 

m 

w 

w 

a 

w 

W 

w 

a 

w 

a 

w 

w 

w 

a 

■6 

.2 

•^ 

<N 

CO 

■* 

•o 

CO 

■^ 

00 

en 

o 

-< 

rt 

CO 

■* 

>o 

■-I 

CM 

Ph 

s 

^• 

>< 

ki 

« 

« 

X 

x' 

(-i 

>< 

«■ 

><■ 

X 

><■ 

Ixj 

X 

X 

>i 

X 

« 

© 

> 

X 

« 

>^ 

>< 

><! 

><! 

>^ 

X 

>^ 

X 

X 

X 

X 

1^ 

Kl 

>< 

DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS  WITH   SHEEP. 


245 


o 

M 

C5 

t~- 

CO 

« 

o 

to 

s 

° 

^ 

s 

W5 

CO 

00 

00 

00 

0 

■* 

0 
T 

esi 

CO 

s 

CO 

s 

CO 

CO 

CO 

o 

CO 

o 

g 

oi 

o 

s 

CO 

o 

W5 

0 

U5 

0 
0 

0 

CO 

CO 

0 

10 

■**< 
•* 

-* 

CO 

CO 

00 

o 
eo 

CO 
CO 

CO 

o 

CO 

o 
eo 

CO 

CO 

CO 

eo 

CO 

o 
eo 

CO 

eo 

CO 

5 

CO 

CO 
CO 

CO 
CO 

eo 
eo 

eo 

SI 

eo 

?J 

" 

oo 

CO 
00 

t- 

CO 
t-- 

00 

in 
oo 

t^ 

o 

CO 

OS 
CO 

S 

05 

0 

0 

CO 

t--^ 

OS 

0 

s 

cs 

o 

o 

o 
to 

CO 
CO 

o 

CO 

CO 

CO 
CO 

CO 
CO 

o 
oo 

CD 

CO 
CO 

o 

CO 

CO 

02 

CO 

CO 

CO 

05 
CO 

00 

CO 

00 

CO 

0 
0 

CO 

CI 
CO 

CO 

oi 
00 

Oi 

00 

CO 

OS 

O 

o 

02 

CO 

00 

C-l 

00 

0 

§8 

10 

00 

00 

■^ 

g 

s 

8 

0 

00 
00 

eo 

OS 

00 

c 

e 
>> 

c! 

K 

.2 
a 

B 
>> 

.a 

i 

•3c 

13 

13 

a 

e 
1 

2 

.2 

•a 

13 

B 

1 

■3} 

% 

a 
B 

3 

1 

B 

J3 

"ti 

8 
>> 

CO 

K 

2 

an 

13 

B 
>. 

tn 

2 

"3) 

B 

1 

B 

"3) 

B 

B 

"31 

c 

B 

J3 

"3] 

13 

B 

% 

B 

"31 

a 

8 

2 

"3) 

c 

B 

"3) 

c 

B 

C 

8 

a 

CO 

^ 

«o 

CO 

t^ 

00 

05 

o 

" 

£3 

22 

■^ 

" 

c^ 

eo 

^ 

10 

CO 

- 

00 

Ci 

0 

>< 

1^ 

>< 

>< 

x 
>< 

X' 
X 

X 
X 

X 

X 
X 

X 
X 

X 
X 

X 
X 

X 
X 

X 
X 

X 
X 

X 
X 

X 
X 

X 
X 

246       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN   181. 


O 


H 

Q 

o 
o 


o 


o 

to 

o 

to 

00 

to 

C5 

t^ 

t^ 

>o 

■^ 

■^ 

(^ 

C<l 

c^ 

(M 

M 

(M 

(M 

(M 

<M 

C-J 

■M 

a     ^j 

Si,  „  « 

to 

•o 

to 

C^ 

i« 

CO 

gss 

>o 

■* 

to 

to 

CO 

lO 

o 

o 

in 

■* 

■^ 

•^ 

•* 

■* 

Ml 

•* 

•* 

■* 

m 

•«< 

00 

oo 

ffi 

g   w 

ID 

< 

« 

« 

;- 

■* 

„ 

S 

J 

•^ 

>ra 

o 

CQ 

OS 

•» 

CO 

CO 

OS 

oo 

,^ 

_ 

^^ 

_ 

C<l 

CM 

CI 

< 

fo 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

S 

B 

Q 

c 

^ 

o 

^ 

o 

«5 

U5 

tn 

00 

lO 

OS 

»"' 

«< 

oo 

00 

00 

CO 

OO 

t^ 

CO 

to 

t^ 

>o 

to 

■o 

>v^ 

o 

o 

o 

to 

03 

<5i 

00 

00 

00 

00 

00 

OS 

Q 

H 

H 

(SH 

s 

3 

-a 

A 

^ 

i 

S" 

2 

s 

s 

-C 

"a 

^ 

S' 

^ 

M 

bll 

Ml 

bl 

til 

bC 

M 

611 

bn 

M 

bn 

br 

s 

c 

c 

c 

a 

C 

n 

c 

S 

a 

a 

c 

e 

n 

a 

ti 

w 

fei 

tt 

W 

& 

ti 

y 

B 

^ 

e 

a 

B 

B 

e 

a; 
bj) 

c 

"o 

>. 

>> 

>, 

>, 

>) 

>. 

>, 

>, 

>, 

>, 

>. 

>> 

>, 

>, 

>, 

c 

03 

« 

C3 

C3 

cfl 

d 

a 

d 

a 

d 

fl 

rt 

d 

d 

d 

d 

ffi 

K 

w 

ffi 

K 

a 

a 

W 

w 

W 

w 

w 

M 

W 

W 

»=5 

% 

-d 

in 

C5 

01 

fe 

J 
1 

><1 

>'1 

s 
« 

>< 
>< 

>5 

>< 

X 

^ 

X 

>< 

>< 
>< 

>< 

>< 
X 

X 
X 

> 

> 

DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH    SHEEP. 


247 


!D 

OO 

CO 

o 

r^ 

« 

CO 

ITS 

•^ 

'-0 

•^ 

1(5 

kC 

CO 

s 

o 

o 

'- 

o 

CO 

■>1< 

CO 

r- 

a> 

CO 

o 

o 

CO 

>o 

CO 

o 

o 

o 

lO 

t^ 

>o 

t^ 

I^ 

-Tt< 

^H 

00 

t^ 

o 

o 

o 

o 

(^ 

(^ 

o 

05 

r^ 

O^ 

lo 

■^ 

lo 

■* 

•* 

o 

o 

o 

^ 

o 

o 

■^ 

•^ 

■^ 

CO 

•»4* 

•cf 

CO 

05 

CO 

"5 

OO 

00 

00 

en 

CO 

CO 

00 

OO 

CO 

CO 

o 

'- 

to 

CO 

Tf 

ira 

OO 

CO 

!M 

1^ 

CO 

CO 

CO 

S? 

CO 

CO 

« 

o 

t^ 

*"♦ 

t^ 

>o 

00 

•^f 

•<j* 

c^ 

CO 

^ 

CO 

-• 

•* 

115 

M< 

CO 

— 

CO 

■-' 

^ 

"-^ 

K5 

'- 

■* 

o 

o 

CO 

PI 

CO 

t^ 

o 

o 

f- 

00 

00 

CO 

>o 

US 

CO 

CO 

o 

C5 

tf^ 

00 

t^ 

In, 

t^ 

00 

OO 

CO 

CO 

t^ 

05 

b- 

e<i 

C<1 

t^ 

00 

■* 

•^ 

t^ 

w 

t^ 

o 

o 

o 

^^ 

,^ 

CO 

« 

^^ 

o 

00 

o 

OS 

(^ 

t-^ 

^^ 

f^ 

o> 

r>- 

00 

o 

o3 

n 

/»: 

o 

a 

> 

Cl 

C8 

^ 

rt 

a 

01 

d 

a 

» 

a 

M 

-73 

2 

a 

^ 

2 

£ 

Q 

>> 

■  >. 

>, 

>, 

a 

e 

a 

. 

o 

"o 

'o 

?> 

?> 

'o 

Ul 

"O 

-s 

■o 

T) 

bO 

? 

Ti 

03 

OS 

t3 

c3 

Cl 

d 

C3 

■* 

'" 

"""^ 

^ 

3 

-73 

c 

a 

c 

c 

s 

fl 

K 

K 

K 

H 

K 

H 

: 

OS 

'd 

03 

f1 

f. 

e 

pa 

O) 

« 

a 

3 
Ph 

.a 

a 

a 

a 

a 

3 

1 

J3 

^ 
£ 

^ 

w 

s 

J3 

0! 

J3 

a 
1 

bo 

C 

03 

-0 
3 

bC 

a 

03 
3 

bC 

bl) 

a 

03 
3 

bl) 

a 

C3 
73 

3 
«2 

bl 

a 

C3 
T3 
3 

oo 

■^ 

<0 

C-J 

CO 

■rs 

t^ 

o 

c^ 

•ra 

CO 

t^ 

X 

X 

><i 

X 

>< 

>< 

,_; 

X 

X 

><i 

X 

Hi 

X 

hH* 

^ 

^ 

l_l 

„. 

„. 

^ 

X 

>^ 

XI 

><1 

>^ 

X 

X 

y. 

X 

^ 

k^ 

« 

X 

XI 

X 
X 

X 
X 

X 

248       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 


O 


o 

p? 


02 

O 
H 

O 

;? 

o 


o 

ft, 

o 
O 


<o 

o 

o 

C5 

o 

en 

CO 

00 

lO 

d 
fe 

CO 

-^ 

CO 

^ 

eo 

o 

l^ 

iO 

TJ- 

f^ 

CO 

co 

CO 

?      -^ 

S*,,  -s    " 

lO 

CO 

CO 

00 

o 

tn 

-.tl 

SP  S  =s 

•"-f 

o 

CO 

CO 

O     gj      tH 

eo 

CO 

00 

•o 

CO 

o 

o 

-m"-   X 

M 

00 

00 

00 

o 

in 

05 

g     W 

M 
< 

« 

« 

(,• 

o 

oo 

CB 

_, 

f. 

C5 

C<I 

t^ 

>n 

CO 

C5 

I: 

•2 

CO 

r* 

Oi 

.-' 

o 

o 

o 

e-1 

t^ 

*"; 

•"1 

« 

o 

O 

t^ 

oo 

00 

<s 

O 

^ 

E 

CO 

w 

c^ 

C^ 

-^ 

>; 

P 

.S 

o 

00 

•* 

Ci 

=-, 

o> 

CO 

o 

cq 

'o 

CO 

•o 

00 

o 

CO 

l« 

..^ 

o 

oi 

CO 

■* 

lO 

o 

o 

I. 

0-. 

o 

00 

Ph 

o 

o 

o 

oo 

o 

o 

j: 

U5 

o 

CO 

00 

t^ 

00_ 

CO 

•o 

>o 

■< 

OJ 

■* 

M 

e^ 

•a 

>.2 

«   . 

Irt 

o 

05 

CO 

co 

CO 

us 

o 

(M 

CO 

toJ3  +^ 

1« 

lO 

t^ 

o 

05 

o 

CO 

eq 

e^ 

«o 

S  ° 

■^ 

CO 

■^ 

t^ 

<3J 

Ol 

OJ 

CJ 

oo 

OS 

00 

Oi 

o 

<n 

a 

tT 

H 

3 

3 

02 

'^ 

H 

5 

o 

o 

fa 

<U 

ta 

ta 

'a 

a 

03 

a 

a 
a 

a 

C3 

? 

f* 

,c 

A 

t-> 

t4 

^ 

J 

bD 

Ul 

bO 

"i 

•3 

"3 

.2 

^ 

.C 

J3 

^ 

<1> 

0) 

ffi 

s 

"S 

J3 

M 

60 

bU 

s 

a 

a 

E 

E 

.2 

2 

js 

2 

b 

^ 

>> 

« 

o 

(3 

c 

fl 

o 

o 

o 

c 

.S 

o 
> 

to 

1 

_2 

3 

0) 

2 

<s> 

'3 

o 

"o 

s- 

"m 

'tis 

"m 

3 

3 

3 

u 

^ 

c3 

03 

_g 

C3 

c3 

1 

1 

"3 

3 

03 

C5 

to 

4) 

bo 
a) 

tV 
^ 

bO 

c 

1" 

(K 

cc 

H 

^ 

^ 

^ 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

o 

«s 

■<)< 

o 

»o 

CO 

CO 

C-. 

o 

c 

P^ 

X 

>< 

X 
X 

X 
X 

.2 
1 

X 

X 
X 

> 
X 

X 

X 

X 

>< 

X! 

X 
X 

DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH    SHEEP. 


249 


Eh 
O 


O 

o 


o 
O 


fa 
< 


•rt* 

CD 

eo 

in 

^ 

CO 

■^ 

to 

*'• 

CM 

t^ 

■>»> 

»rt 

^ 

•* 

•* 

■* 

« 

« 

eo 

eo 

eo 

CO 

eo 

eo 

eo 

eo 

a     -J 

00 

OS 

CM 

m 

„ 

o 

^^ 

m 

(M 

OO 

o 

O 

!>. 

to 

C'l 

w 

CO 

CO 

CM 

eo 

to 

to 

to 

U5 

ITS 

eo 

TJ« 

^ 

■* 

^ 

■^ 

•^ 

•^ 

Tl< 

-^ 

■<t< 

■* 

■* 

■* 

■w 

IK 

< 

g     W 

a 

o 

OO 

o 

■* 

CM 

o 

s 

o 

CM 

ira 

«o 

to 

o 

o 

.s 

CM 

^^ 

CO 

o 

00 

t„ 

to 

t%. 

o 

to 

OO 

fe 

CM 

CM 

CM 

CM 

IS 

0 

d 

s 

^ 

CM 

to 

Ss 

to 

>o 

02 

•* 

eo 

o 

CM 

(>> 

eo 

CM 

C^ 

CM 

C-1 

— 

CM 

o 

CM 

CI 

»H 

o 

CM 

.-1 

^^ 

•■* 

■  ' 

'■^ 

^^ 

'  ^ 

'  ' 

'  ^ 

'    ' 

'  ' 

'  ' 

*"" 

■    ' 

'  ' 

•"• 

*"* 

FU 

.n 

M 

>o 

00 

CO 

UO 

J^ 

1^ 

eo 

CM 

CM 

r- 

t^ 

CO 

eo 

•— ' 

eo 

.*< 

< 

tS 

•* 

Sh 

CM 

OO 

t^ 

•^ 

CO 

eo 

CO 

C5 

o 

" 

o 

^ 

CM 

Dry 

Matter 

in 
Air-dry 
Feces. 

o 

05 

O 

00 

t~ 

OS 

o 

t^ 

OS 

eo 

■o 

to 

00 

■* 

ira 

OO 

05 

lO 

U5 

« 

■* 

lO 

in 

CM 

CJ 

eo 

eo 

eo 

o 

Oi 

i:Ssl'S 

^ 

^ 

O 

o 

CO 

o 

lO 

-* 

00 

U5 

O 

o 

a> 

<r> 

^ 

■o 

OS 

lO 

OO 

CO 

to 

lO 

to 

eo 

to 

•o 

o 

On 

ten 

Fee 

Air- 

(Gra 

03 

t>. 

o 

CM 

C>1 

!51 

._) 

Oa 

CM 

CO 

a;          ^ 

Averag 
Daily 
Feces 

(Grams 

^ 

o» 

CO 

•* 

^ 

■* 

00 

■* 

_ 

o 

o 

W5 

^^ 

CO 

CM 

O 

CO 

CM 

eo 

^ 

eo 

eo 

■* 

O 

eo 

CO 

T3 

'^ 

t> 

O 

o 

H 

Fi 

a> 

^ 

^ 

J3 

J2 

re 

1 

-a 

J3 

1 

1 

r/3 

i 

■€ 

1 

1 

"3 

C3 

^ 

^ 

^ 

<0 

o 

0, 

a 

R 

a 

a 

Q. 

a 

^ 

X! 

.iJ 

X2 

a 

a 

d 

d 

a 

s 

d 
0. 

cS 

ci 

a 

3 

S 

S 

U 

o 

B 

a 

60 

bC 

-3 

-r) 

T5 

Tl 

■O 

TJ 

T> 

-rt 

-rt 

•a 

^ 

-n 

T3 

T3 

C 

e 

d 

a 

n 

a 

C 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

ci 

«3 

« 

03 

a 

ej 

Oj 

03 

03 

>i 

>> 

>. 

>. 

>. 

>, 

>. 

>i 

>> 

>, 

>i 

>, 

>. 

> 

>1 

>> 

C5 

01 

01 

C3 

ci 

a 

01 

C3 

ot 

oi 

03 

ea 

OS 

cr 

(S 

cj 

J= 

JS 

-C 

.a 

.d 

•a 

J5 

J3 

JS 

JS 

J3 

.d 

J3 

.d 

J3 

J3 

J3 

JS 

J= 

^ 

4= 

-a 

.a 

.d 

j= 

J3 

J3 

J3 

JS 

J3 

J3 

.a 

"Si 

Tn 

"bb 

Tfi 

Tn 

"hn 

"3) 

"ui 

"m 

"3 

"bl) 

"b 

"bi 

"bb 

C 

a 

a 

d 

a 

c 

e 

d 

d 

c 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

w 

W 

w 

W 

d 

.    o 

> 

> 

-• 

s 

- 

1— t 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

«■ 

s 

-■ 

a 

tc 

_o 

to 

CO 

-* 

■«f 

IC 

O 

to 

to 

l>. 

>- 

CM 

CM 

eo 

eo 

■* 

^ 

fS 

g 

H 

y 

H-i 

B 

B 

HH 

H 

B 

s 

ti 

>< 

X" 

x' 

>< 

x' 

>< 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

>• 

K* 

> 

> 

> 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X. 

^ 

X 

X 

y. 

X 

k^ 

^<! 

x: 

X 

250       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 


O 


O 

w 

o 

z 
o 


o 


o 

* 

>n 

o 

CO 

\n 

o 

CO 

00 

(M 

lO 

"1 

rv) 

to 

to 

t^ 

^ 

C5 

"rf 

r* 

o 

.  00 

■^ 

00 

ib 

l-O 

CO 

^'. 

CJ 

m 

CO 

CO 

•.** 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

■^ 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

•«< 

so 

c^a 

•^ 

■.f 

C^l 

~ 

o 

CO 

to 

o 

r^ 

CM 

CO 

to 

^ 

lO 

t^ 

M  o  a 

o 

o 

C-. 

CO 

CM 

CO 

in 

CO 

cs 

r* 

"* 

5  £  2 

•o 

to 

^ 

CO 

•^ 

C^l 

CM 

CO 

r^ 

,^ 

ira 

ira 

r- 

ira 

_; 

o 

r-^ 

tf) 

■^ 

"^ 

•^ 

•.** 

-.** 

■*r 

•^ 

■^ 

•.»' 

^j< 

'**' 

■.S' 

19' 

m 

•* 

g     W 

H 
» 
H 

CO 

■^ 

00 

o 

oo 

00 

CM 

>o 

M" 

05 

to 

CO 

cs 

^M 

o 

CO 

to 

CS 

CO 

oo 

r^ 

O 

CO 

CM 

o 

CO 

to 

CO 

o 

XI 

i-'S 

u? 

oo 

oo 

lO 

oo 

CO 

to 

C5 

o 

OO 

00 

00 

00 

IC 

t^ 

to 

5 

s 

<M 

CJ 

CJ 

c^ 

CM 

e-j 

(M 

C-J 

C-l 

CO 

CM 

CM 

CM 

CM 

CM 

CM 

CM 

S 

1- 

_C 

O 

o 

00 

o 

N 

■*#< 

O 

>o 

-!)< 

^ 

U5 

CM 

O 

o 

■* 

O 

~ 

'o 

to 

to 

to 

•■^ 

o 

CO 

o 

00 

OS 

lO 

o 

o 

>o 

•i* 

c^ 

c-i 

CM 

_i 

CM 

—• 

o 

C5 

CO 

CM 

—^ 

CO 

— i 

J, 

CO 

u 

Ph 

o 

^ 

in 

^ 

>c 

^ 

^ 

■V 

oo 

00 

^ 

00 

^ 

^ 

1^ 

~ 

rj 

cc 

CO 

•^ 

to 

o 

CM 

to 

o 

o 

o 

CO 

00 

cs 

■* 

.-• 

CO 

o 

oi 

o 

^ 

•>»> 

■<»< 

IC 

"5 

cs 

o 

00 

o 

00 

00 

j^ 

r~ 

cs 

"i; 

U4 

>>  . 

o 

o 

o 

t^ 

CO 

•* 

(^ 

o 

CM 

CO 

lO 

o 

to 

-a  g 

"5 

o 

oo 

■"! 

Cs 

t>. 

o 

00 

■^ 

CO 

■* 

S 

o 

Q  03  — 

•* 

•^ 

"5 

■^ 

>o 

M^ 

in 

ira 

ira 

"5 

lO 

tri 

"5 

•.** 

^j< 

^9* 

^f^ 

o 

Oi 

o 

o 

o 

Ci 

o 

en 

Oi 

o 

OS 

OS 

S 

cs 

CS 

>i'm 

o 

^ 

CO 

o 

^ 

a> 

to 

•^ 

^ 

o 

^ 

•V 

CM 

CO 

CM 

^ 

o 

i5i 

■SS 

o 

CO 

o 

00 

CO 

o 

o 

•^ 

CO 

CO 

o 

■«j« 

•^ 

t^ 

TJ< 

o 

T 

r- 

c  c  g 

V  s 

m 

■* 

lO 

c-i 

ci 

o 

_^ 

o 

ci 

_; 

CO 

Tf< 

r^ 

*** 

cs 

CO 

CO 

<s 

M 

C^l 

CO 

CM 

s 

o 

^ 

g-&«s 

O 

CO 

■*f 

CO 

to 

CO 

CO 

^^ 

00 

■^ 

00 

00 

00 

t-- 

in 

OS 

o  s  g  g 

00 

o 

W5 

« 

oo 

o 

o 

o 

in 

oo 

"5 

lO 

lO 

-a< 

m 

(M 

CO 

■^ 

CO 

in 

^Qfeo 

M 

cS 

bC 

"3 

"cs 

_o 

c; 

o 

g 

s 

"S 

>> 

>> 

•3 

t-l 

o 
> 

o 
> 

1 

B 

03 

a 

1 

H 

■a 
s 

o 

o 

1 
1 

3 

o 

"« 

'o 

a 

a 

c 
S 

03 

o 

a 

S 

_[-. 

J3 

2 

"bi 

"bi 

"S 

w 

> 

> 

C 

c 

"o 

"o 

rs 

13 

■V 

_3 

o 

0) 

a 

03 

c 

a 

•6 

03 

c 
2 

a 
3 

a 

U) 

J3 

J3 

J3 

1 

>2 

J 

1 

o. 

0. 

g 

o 

1 

o3 
to 

.a 

a 

a 

1 

3 
0. 

3 
0. 

1 

1h 

^ 

g 

o 

c3 

1 

a 

8 

8 

"bi 

"3 
"3) 

3 

"Si 

c 

C3 

3 

C 
03 

s 

c 

03 

1 

a 

o 

a 

C3 

•a 

03 

s 

5? 

^ 

>> 

>> 

>. 

>i 

>. 

>. 

S^ 

>> 

>> 

>, 

>, 

>^ 

>, 

>, 

>, 

03 

03 

ej 

OS 

c4 

e3 

C3 

C3 

cS 

03 

cj 

C3 

03 

o3 

03 

03 

s 

.£3 

Xi 

JS 

.a 

.fl 

^ 

-a 

JS 

J= 

^ 

J3 

-C 

-C 

-C3 

J= 

"S 

.a 

.a 

"S 

"m 

J3 

.£ 

JS 

-s 

J3 

■S 

:§ 

J= 

^ 

^ 

•S 

Ji 

•  ^ 

.■ii 

tsD 

ui 

60 

bD 

bO 

bt 

M 

tc 

"bi 

bD 

bc 

M 

bt 

b« 

bl 

"3) 

bc 

a 

ca 

13 

S 

a 

C 

C 

a 

f3 

fl 

c 

C 

C 

C 

c 

a 

W 

W 

W 

W 

w 

W 

W 

W 

H 

w 

w 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

<0 

> 

> 

"• 

a 

"• 

s 

-• 

M 

> 

> 

a 

> 

> 

>■ 

hH 

s 

> 

JS 

t» 

• 

_o 

l!5 

m 

to 

o 

t- 

t- 

00 

00 

cs 

o 

o 

O 

— 

C3 

CO 

CO 

-t* 

(£ 

o 

y. 

y. 

'A 

x' 

Ixj 

y 

y 

K^' 

y 

X 

><i 

d 

d 

d 

X 

y 

d 

t-H 

/J 

x 

y 

y. 

y 

ki 

y 

y 

>< 

y 

><) 

y 

>< 

>< 

>^ 

y 

y 

>< 

DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH    SHEEP. 


251 


CS    00    «D    GO    ^O 


CO   CO   CO 


CO   00 
■^   CO 


^     Tt*     CO     '-H 


-H    00   OO    -H 


c^   «*<   ■^ 


CO   lo   CO   <r> 


OO    Oi   lO    C^ 


00    OO    OO    lO 
CO    CO    lO    Tt< 


iC   CO   CO 


»0   00   CO   eq    W5   CO 


00   c^   «:o 


r^   O   ^ 


CO   CO   »ra   oo   Oi 


CS   C^   M   c^   c^ 


CO   -^   O   ^ 


CO   CO   (M    M 


o 

"5 

o 

o 

-**< 

^ 

o 

^ 

rr, 

00 

lO 

o 

o 

ira 

t^ 

s 

lo 

~ 

- 

" 

O 

o 

2 

2 

s 

« 

eo 

e^ 

^ 

^ 

o> 

o 

02 

o 

= 

o 

"^ 

- 

- 

O   OO    CO 


OS   CO   CO   CO 


w   00   c^   ca 


-H     »H     OJ 


lO   ■^    C^    lO 


C^iOcDiOiCcOCsOCS^ 


O^        O         C3         C) 


e<i      e^      00      CO      ift      OS      lo 


»o       »o       lO 


CD        CO        CO 

m      in      ui 


O'— '^^COCOOOiOcOcDt'-i-HO'^r-OOOOO 
000005C^O^»C«— i'»t«OsC^OCOOOC^OO 


lO         CO         i-r 


GO         OO         00         CD 


OS        CS        UD        o 


CO         U?         CO         CO         ^         CO 


■^         "*<         CO         »J3 


-S     3 


2    s    a 


S     £ 


bC       bC       bC       to 


GJ         ^         43 


bO        bC       bO        bfi        bO        b£ 


bO       bC        bC        bJ3 


a 

H     W     W     W     H     W     W 

w   w 

W 

WWWWWHWH 

WWW 

> 

>  >  "  s  -  s  - 

H-t         HH 

•^ 

"s>>^>>5: 

>;  >  > 

lOiO^H^HiMiMCOCO 


■ft^         O         lO        CO        b* 


00        00        oo 


252       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 


O 


O 


o 
O 


r.1 

-, 

tn 

ro 

o 

LO 

t— 

CT 

CO 

UO 

C3 

CO 

to 

-»** 

»o 

00 

o 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

<M 

o) 

CO 

eo 

CO 

CO 

■<»< 

■w 

CO 

■^ 

eo 

-* 

■<J< 

•w 

eo 

to 

J^ 

eo 

IM 

o 

C3 

o 

^ 

2£l 

Ci 

t^ 

c^ 

CO 

CO 

oo 

C5 

to 

-^ 

O 

to 

•^ 

■^ 

■* 

■^ 

Tt« 

•^ 

■^ 

•*f 

03 

■< 

g    K 

•< 

u 

O 

OS 

o 

lO 

o 

eo 

o 

>o 

o 

o> 

CO 

CO 

CO 

■* 

oo 

^ 

tM 

t>. 

CO 

f,. 

to 

E 

<M 

(N 

(N 

CI 

CO 

CO 

CM 

CO 

CN 

CJ 

a 

.n 

^ 

o 

"5 

•* 

oo 

02 

to 

'-' 

CO 

Oi 

CO 

o 

00 

•* 

•* 

o 

OJ 

05 

S 

>o 

CO 

C5 

o 

CO 

CO 

T 

o 

— 

o 

o 

^; 

^ 

a> 

Ph 

to 

to 

^ 

c» 

^ 

-V1 

o 

CO 

-9< 

a> 

o 

eo 

o 

•* 

oo 

lO 

'—I 

oo 

oo 

■^ 

'-I 

oo 

05 

lO 

to 

to 

«> 

00 

05 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

._, 

•>}< 

eo 

o 

<; 

e<5 

•X< 

<M 

CO 

.n 

l« 

CO 

CO 

to 

o 

lO 

1« 

lO 

s 

C'l 

CM 

o 

C5 

C5 

OS 

3! 

o 

r. 

CO 

o 

„ 

Oa 

CO 

„ 

itSg-sa 

oo 

o 

to 

»— < 

a 

c^ 

C-. 

to 

CI 

eo 

^^ 

oSfe:^5 

'^ 

CO 

" 

CO 

l^sl 

C-1 

c^ 

to 

o 

CO 

fe-3§g 

>0fe5 

C3 

rt 

d 

s 

£ 

E 

i^ 

a 

bH 

M 

M 

fc- 

a 

a 

t 

a 

C. 

ft 

>> 

>, 

>> 

■c 

-T) 

o 

n 

o 

o 

O 

> 

> 

> 

-3 

o 

a 

01 

m 

5; 

K 

f4 

m 

o 

u 

3 

u 
3 

1 

s 

J2 

0? 

o 

o 

bO 

hn 

b(l 

H 

z 

1^5 

w 

53 

>• 

> 

>• 

fa 

CS 

C3 

■n 

_3 
"3) 

(U 

a 

C3 

Tl 

•a 
a 

C3 

-3 

-o" 

1 

1 

_ffl 

1 

1 

<1> 

a 

a 

a 

a 

a 

0) 

J3 

A 

s 

a 
a) 

a 

1 

3 

"3) 

"3) 

"3) 

3 

"3) 

"3) 

ti: 

3 

3 

3 

Tl 

Ti 

3 

3 

3 

■n 

Tl 

■n 

"0 

TS 

-^ 

bO 

M 

"3) 

a 

a 

C3 

u> 

60 

bO 

a 

03 

a 

c3 

a 

03 

a 

C3 

a 

03 

a 

C3 

>. 

>. 

>i 

>. 

>. 

>1 

>. 

>■ 

>> 

>, 

>, 

>1 

>1 

>, 

>, 

>1 

m 

03 

o 

oj 

o 

03 

a 

n 

OS 

o3 

-c 

M 

^ 

A 

-a 

JH 

^ 

.£3 

^ 

^ 

J3 

-a 

j3 

.a 

X 

ja 

^ 

J3 

M 

J3 

A 

ji 

ja 

J3 

J3 

J= 

J3 

-a 

j= 

-a 

r- 

.2 

.2 

;a 

•2 

.2 

.2 

M 

oo 

Ul 

60 

M 

M 

hi) 

bn 

M 

bn 

bl) 

61) 

6(1 

bl) 

bn 

bC 

fi 

C 

a 

a 

a 

a 

a 

a 

a 

a 

a 

a 

a 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

w 

w 

W 

W 

W 

w 

W 

t 

.a 

CO 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

>■ 

> 

> 

> 

>■ 

> 

> 

> 

> 

o 

o 

O 

— 

— 

— 

Cl 

M 

CO 

CO 

CO 

■* 

T»* 

•* 

— 

-^ 

— 

C-l 

P^ 

s 

X 

t^ 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

x" 

X' 

>< 

X' 

X 
X 

HH 

X 
X 

X 
X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

>< 

X 

X 

X 

>< 

X 

X 

DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH    SHEEP. 


253 


OO-TfOCOMC-lQOCO 


*0   C^   t^   00 


lO   ■^   CI   eci 


r-   ic   ko 


CO   eo   CO   ci   t^   t^ 


00   CO   oo 


t-    C^    iC    <M 


iM    f-H    lO   CO   CO   »0   ^ 


Ci   1-1    lO   CO   Oi 


oc^CMcqcococsjca 


CO       c^       »o 


Ci         T-^        O         ^H 


O        CO        CO 


oo        00        Tt* 


r-«         1--         r-« 


cocoeooico-^coioco 


oo         CO        to        00 


lOOCO'-HlOmOCS 
CJiOiOCDOiCiCOOO 


OOOCO'^WSCOC^OS 


^ 

s 

s 

00 

00 

O 

to 

US 

o 

t- 

oa 

o 

N 

(M 

■^ 

^ 

^44 

in 

Ol 

Oi 

a> 

05 

en 

03 

OS 

O 

o» 

1^ 

to 

to 

o 

,^ 

lO 

•* 

00 

M< 

to 

o 

r>l 

OO 

J^ 

M 

CQ 

to 

cn 

^ 

to 

■"X 

OO 

t>- 

•«< 

lO 

»« 

U5 

■^ 

o 

CO 

,-1 

m 

o 

O 

to 

IM 

IM 

C5  Cfl  00  OO 
C^  ^H  t^  (M 
f-        CO       »0        W3 


Ca        CO       C^        C<I        lO        CO        CO 


CO       00        CO       OS 


CO        C^        C^        W3        to 


i— '        en        cc        CO 


(M        00        CO 


»0       CO      *o       to      to 


C3 

o3 

rt 

g 

S 

H 

•        >> 

>. 

>> 

O 

o 

o 

> 

> 

> 

o 

ffi 

o 

<a 

d 

id 

fc- 

,    -i 

J2 
C3 

£3 

a 

o 

to 

_3 

^ 

_3 

.        > 

>■ 

> 

Tl 

TS 

•n 

a 

-2 

3 

c3 

a 

C3 

C3 

C3 

ca 

^ 

^ 

,a 

-o 

13 

•7-1 

M 

o 

t; 

<l> 

c 

e 

a 

-« 

O 

o 

o 

rs 

s 

0 

d 

■a 

o 

o 

o 

tl) 

U) 

U) 

0. 

u 

0. 

>)      >> 

>. 

>. 

& 

>• 

& 

>. 

:3     73      5       0 


S       S       S 


s  s  s 

^     «  P  c 

o    B  S  S 

^    2  .3  3 

T^.           Kfl  fcft  Kfl 


CQ 

« 

m 

ii 

& 

s 

o 

<u 

Z 

iz; 

^ 

j3     ^     ^     .a 


Tc    "to    "m    "m    "3    "Si    "bb    "Sb    ""    '^"    '^"    '^"    '^-    '^"    ~"    ""     ""    '^"    '^-    "^^    '^-    '^" 


M        ht       M       M 


WWWHHWWHWHWWWWW 


"     > 


^        jj.       w 


>  c 


^    >    >    ><    X 


X    f^    > 


CO        CO        CO 


lO        lO        to        CD        CO         ?0 


00        00        00 


y,   y,   y.   X   X   X   X   X   X   X   X   X   X   X   X   X   y.   X   y.   y.   X   y, 

X    X    X    X    X    X    X    X    X    X    X    X    X    X    X    X    X    X    X    X    X    X 


254       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 


'13 


o 


w 
O 

P-l 


o 
O 


to 

05 

^ 

(M 

c^ 

^ 

IM 

1^ 

a 

CI 

Ift 

W5 

o 

"* 

■»• 

■* 

TO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

'  ■* 

CO 

eo 

^^ 

IM 

(M 

c    *; 

2£i 

CO 

in 

o 

OS 

C>J 

t- 

oo 

•o 

■.*• 

n 

CO 

IN 

<M 

^ 

CO 

o 

^H 

tn 

lO 

CO 

CO 

o 

Ci 

f„ 

•* 

•* 

■* 

•* 

«* 

■» 

■* 

■* 

f 

■* 

■* 

•* 

P3 

g    W 

« 

Oi 

CO 

o= 

CS 

._! 

o> 

05 

C5 

r^ 

f^ 

r.. 

lO 

'"' 

*-" 

CO 

^ 

r- 

H 

e-i 

,_, 

,_, 

,M 

OO 

OJ 

05 

,_, 

o> 

•^ 

to 

CO 

!>. 

•< 

1* 

'•"' 

'•"' 

(.^ 

(M 

iM 

CO 

IM 

ct 

IM 

IM 

(M 

P 

d 

in 

to 

•^ 

^ 

05 

-r 

»— ' 

CO 

o 

"^ 

p 

^ 

S 

tr> 

t^ 

<= 

o 

O 

o 

— 

C>1 

— 

o 

C<1 

CO 

C^ 

o 

-- 

CO 

^ 

t^ 

t^ 

^ 

^ 

o 

•* 

OO 

(N 

OS 

t^ 

oo 

ro 

to 

o 

00 

o 

^ 

'"^ 

■>1< 

CO 

CO 

00 

< 

■^ 

2 

•rt 

■* 

M 

CO 

C^ 

CO 

CO 

2 

•^ 

" 

•^ 

CO 

2 

00 

o 

o 

>'-2^ 

f^rn- 

o 

<M 

05 

M 

t^ 

•>*l 

O 

o 

o 

eo 

"s 

<f^ 

o. 

en 

" 

en 

ro 

^"^ 

oo 

t^ 

„ 

^^ 

o 

r^l 

to 

^ 

_ 

^ 

i^i-ss 

CO 

cc 

o 

c  e  S 

.'.  ? 

o 

C3 

M< 

-^ 

•c 

to 

oo 

t^ 

^ 

^ 

^ 

<s 

" 

CO 

" 

CO 

CO 

" 

o 

--i 

^i?si 

CO 

to 

m 

OS 

oo 

o 

>c 

— . 

^ 

ffi^  g  g 

o 

cf 

a 

to 

^ 

H 

"S 

1 

T3 

a 

> 

> 

i 

s 

1 

^ 

C3 

s 

C3 

o 

o 

u 

bll 

tn 

6fl 

tn 

til 

a) 

c 

T3 
S 

^ 

^ 

a 

03 

ej 

c 

03 

3 
03 

3 

3 
03 

13 

•B 

-; 

-^ 

c 

C3 

'< 

i* 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

M 

bC 

^ 
3 

3 

C/J 

Ui 

C/J 

C/J 

«.> 

;/. 

-c 

-— 

■n 

13 

IS 

-o 

^ 

H 

T1 

-^ 

c 

fi 

Ul 

bH 

a 

C 

c 

a 

C 

3 

3 

3 

C3 

03 

03 

03 

03 

es 

C3 

03 

C3 

CS 

>. 

>> 

>. 

>> 

>, 

>, 

>, 

>. 

>, 

>. 

>> 

>> 

>1 

>, 

>, 

>, 

>, 

T. 

rt 

c! 

C3 

C3 

C3 

C3 

C3 

08 

fe 

x: 

J3 

*C 

^ 

^ 

ji 

J3 

Xi 

A 

J3 

j= 

J3 

^ 

J= 

J= 

j= 

-C 

-C 

^ 

J3 

J3 

J3 

J3 

J3 

J3 

j: 

^ 

^ 

j2 

,a 

^ 

^ 

2 

» 

cfi 

tn 

"1 

"1 

r/i 

V] 

M 

Ti 

3 

Ml 

hi) 

t>(l 

ill 

bll 

M 

tJI 

b(l 

M 

fed 

bn 

c 

C 

C 

C 

fi 

a 

C 

13 

C 

C 

C 

c 

3 

c 

a 

3 

W 

W 

w 

W 

w 

w 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

w 

w 

W 

W 

w 

w 

73 

d 

^ 

M 

►> 

H^ 

„• 

„• 

> 

> 

H- i 

>■ 

,_; 

> 

>■ 

> 

X 

X 

X 

S 

X 

J2 

X 

X 

13 

O 

^ 

^ 

« 

CO 

CO 

CO 

•^ 

•* 

•-1 

•-I 

M 

(M 

CO 

CO 

■* 

TC 

CO 

(U 

^ 

1^ 

>< 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 
X 

X 
X 

Oi 

X 

X 

X 

k^ 

X 

Xi 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH    SHEEP. 


255 


Cl         — *        O         u^ 


CO        CO        CT>        lO 


OO        CO        "M 


t^ 

<M 

00 

CO 

•o< 

o 

00 

o 

O) 

^ 

CO 

oo 

>o 

CO 

CM 

A 

CO 

o 

t^ 

o 

CO 

« 

CO 

<M 

CO 

IM 

CO 

CO 

(M 

C^ 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

o 

"* 

CO 

CO 

CO 

^ 

-f. 

o 

^ 

^ 

o 

„ 

s 

C*l 

OS 

J^ 

^ 

s 

CO 

o 

o 

CO 

UO 

CM 

•o 

t^ 

l>^ 

t^ 

QO 

oo 

C5 

oo 

t- 

t^ 

CO 

t,^ 

t^ 

CM 

CM 

^ 

Tl" 

•* 

^ 

~ 

•«< 

•ai 

■>*< 

o 

■^ 

M. 

^ 

(N 

t^ 

>o 

^ 

^ 

^ 

^ 

f 

.n 

ro 

•* 

lo 

CO 

■* 

l— < 

ira 

.-t 

OS 

t^ 

t^ 

CO 

Lf^ 

CO 

■»f 

CM 

cc 

(S. 

■"f 

■* 

CM 

CM 

CO 

cq 

^ 

w 

e^ 

t^ 

M 

05 

^ 

^ 

■O" 

o 

o 

CO 

CO 

CM 

M 

CO 

•* 

■<»1 

•* 

o 

o 

2 

CO 

"^ 

CO 

2 

(M 

05 

o 

«n 

o 

o 

o 

^ 

^ 

- 

" 

^ 

o 

<M 

o 

e-) 

CO 

o 

e^ 

o 

o 

o 

CO 

N 

<M 

o 

OS 

rn 

CO 

00 

'— ' 

•<»< 

■* 

■>!< 

c^ 

•^ 

t^ 

CO 

O 

o 

o 

o 

o 

a> 

OS 

05 

o 

o 

^ 

00 

05 

OS 

OS 

oo 

00 

CO 

CO 

^ 

o 

^^ 

^ 

•* 

^ 

rs. 

^ 

o 

00 

en 

o 

»— ' 

•* 

CO 

oo 

oo 

■o 

CM 

oo 

•>* 

^ 

'^ 

M^ 

CO 

1^ 

^^ 

o 

«n 

Oi 

Oi 

OS 

OS 

OS 

CO 

_ 

t^ 

i>- 

r. 

-p 

f^ 

f^ 

,^ 

f^ 

f^ 

^ 

CO 

CO 

Cs 

r^ 

o 

oo 

OS 

t^ 

CO 

UO 

CO 

00 

»c 

•o 

o 

oo 

O 

,— , 

00 

oo 

CO 

t^ 

o 

o 

CO 

t>. 

CO 

CO 

K5 

« 

CO 

c^ 

<M 

CM 

CO 

CO 

CM 

CM 

C-1 

CM 

CO^^CMOS^hCMCOOS 


-H     CO     —     t^ 


«    Pi 


Q  p 


"— ;    hfihflhJDbfl'bJb'bb'ti^^    c3'tll'bfl'^'c3    ^ 


(i>  pS  rf: 


CO   CO   c» 

K 

W  K  H 

H 

W 

w 

w 

^ 

<    w 

w 

^ 

^ 

« 

tf 

S  ?  c 
02  CO  W 

w 

^'  ^  i 

> 

>  d  ^" 

>■ 

> 

> 

> 

>■ 

^'  s" 

i^ 

i-i 
>< 

« 

l>    l-i   M 

d   X   s;^ 

>^ 

00   oo   O   OS 


O     i-H     ^ 


IM    iM    CO   CC 


rt<    lO    lO   to   O   !>•   r— 


256       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 


Q 
W 

03 

;?, 
o 
o 

«■ 


O 

« 


Q 
O 

S 
P4 

a 

O 

o 

Q 

:?; 

Q 
<! 

o 

S 
cq 


[=< 
o 

Eh 

» 
O 

3 


8-g 

0 

0 

0 

^ 

0 

10 

t^ 

0 

0 

t^ 

ira 

U5 

0 

te 

^ 

00 

^ 

CI 

,_, 

^; 

0Q&; 

'"' 

•-' 

•-H 

'-' 

»— t 

^H 

f— < 

*-» 

y-f 

T-i 

& 

o 

1| 

0 

0 

"5 

0 

0 

0 

0 

in 

0 

r^ 

10 

W 

"2 

00 

■* 

CO 

'^ 

C^ 

0 

,_, 

C5 

_, 

,^ 

00 

1^ 

" 

CO 

CO 

to 

>o 

<M 

•* 

U5 

CO 

co 

^ 

«fn 

J2 

0 

>o 

§ 

0 

0 

g 

•0 

t>. 

10 

D 

II 

£? 

«— « 

0 

OS 

^ 

^^ 

y^ 

^^ 

0 

o> 

00 

O 

" 

CO 

r- 

to 

CO 

to 

CO 

CO 

» 

z 

0 

0 

in 

0 

0 

0 

U5 

0 

0 

»c 

0 

0 

0 

0 

C<l 

10 

0 

■^ 

0 

0 

E| 

0 

» 

^ 

S 

CO 

CO 

to 

to 

CO 

10 

^ 

J2 

n 

TS  i   . 

i"i 

C5 

0 

s 

305 

CO 

CO 

CO 

•0 

Tj< 

1^ 

iU 

<M 

e<> 

CS 

s 

>> 

-- 

> 

> 

> 

0 

0 

m 

i= 

r\ 

» 

— 

^ 

"m 

j: 

J3 

-0 

s? 

Fzh 

•^ 

"rt 

0 

> 

C3 

■2 

■K 

7, 

0 

S 

^ 

^ 

J= 

rn 

n 

-S 

m 

m 

■3 
C 

1 

1 
^ 

0 

J2 

0 

^ 

^ 

C 

a 

'S 

.2* 

'S 

c 
0 

0 

"5. 

-a: 

a 
B 
3 
a 

-3 

03 

rt 

03 

Clt 

3 

3 

a 

S 

S 

0 

§ 

0 

B 

B 

to 

bC 

•o 

•a 

•S 

T3 

■c 

"0 

T1 

T) 

•a 

TH 

T) 

T3 

TS 

13 

3 

c 

c 

e 

0 

e 

a 

C3 

fl 

s 

e 

S 

13 

c 

a 

ce 

« 

C3 

rt 

c3 

ca 

C3 

OS 

C3 

0!S 

03 

03 

CJ 

>i 

>i 

>, 

>, 

>, 

>. 

>> 

>, 

>i 

>, 

>, 

>, 

>, 

>. 

>> 

>. 

c3 

rt 

c3 

03 

3! 

03 

C3 

03 

ja 

>c 

J3 

-0 

^ 

^ 

^ 

^ 

J= 

J3 

J3 

^ 

^ 

-^ 

-C 

j= 

^ 

JS 

j: 

-s 

^ 
m 

J3 

j: 

j: 

"m 

"S 

tn 

•m 

,C 

-s 

J3 

bfl 

tn 

bl) 

u 

Ml 

bl) 

bl) 

btl 

U) 

bll 

bl) 

e 

C 

c 

a 

a 

c 

e 

C 

a 

c 

C 

C 

C 

C 

a 

c 

S 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

w 

W 

W 

W 

W 

w 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

d 
0 

> 

►> 

^• 

j:^' 

^ 

H 

>■ 

> 

>■ 

> 

> 

> 

"• 

H 

i-< 

s 

> 

M 

1 

m 

CO 

^ 

■^ 

0 

0 

0 

0 

t. 

t~ 

<M 

M 

CO 

CO 

•* 

•«i< 

LO 

S 

« 

H 

« 

«• 

-H 

HH 

^ 

a 

t^ 

«• 

>< 

>< 

>< 

X 

X 

><i 

X 

'C 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

><! 

K< 

>< 

X 

><1 

X 

>< 

!» 

« 

^ 

^ 

X 

>< 

X 

>^ 

>< 

^, 

>^. 

DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH   SHEEP. 


257 


lO 

g 

in 

o 

o 

lO 

o 

o 

Lf? 

o 

o 

o 

o 

^ 

t^ 

^^ 

M 

lO 

fcO 

,_, 

t- 

OJ 

t~ 

■^ 

OS 

t- 

oo 

CO 

CO 

t^ 

t~ 

_ 

•* 

00 

o 

CO 

n 

eo 

« 

CO 

CO 

o 

lO 

U5 

o 

UO 

o 

\o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

tn 

»o 

o 

o 

ira 

ira 

o 

t^ 

y^ 

CO 

00 

oo 

CO 

CO 

o 

00 

OS 

C4 

t- 

CO 

o 

CO 

oo 

•* 

OS 

o 

CO 

CO 

•^ 

eo 

-* 

■* 

n 

•* 

CO 

UO 

CO 

'- 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

t^ 

lO 

>o 

o 

o 

o 

Oi 

c^ 

CO 

^H 

_, 

f^ 

CO 

s 

OS 

o 

p 

■>)< 

M 

■* 

■* 

-^ 

-^ 

" 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

lO 

o 

o 

o 

>o 

o 

Ifl 

l« 

o 

o 

40 

o 

,_, 

OS 

CO 

,_, 

lO 

t^ 

oo 

o 

,_( 

CO 

n 

■«< 

m> 

■<»< 

n 

■«»< 

CO 

CO 

in 

00 

t-- 

00 

CO 

CO 

Ci        CO        O        lO 


'^ 

•»< 

r- 

<M 

^ 

•^ 

S3     i5 

—1     t- 

s 

CO 

■»< 

t^ 

■* 

•* 

w 

5 

o      t^ 

o      - 

CO 

^         CO 

■«" 

N 

<M 

3 

bfi 

eS 

a 

a 

:3 

& 

- 

_j 

^. 

•n 

o 

03 

Cl 

si 

> 

r\ 

a 

a 

a 

d 

3 

rt 

^ 

^ 

a 

^ 

^ 

© 

o 

3 

3 

1 

o 

O 

o 

bl) 

•_^ 

>• 

a 

a 

o 

o 

•o 

T1 

-n 

3 

3 

c: 

,a 

j: 

a 

G 

3 

A 

^ 

. 

^ 

9 

s 

^ 

^ 

e8 

3* 

3* 
c« 

■g 

-s 

s 

3 

3 

t- 

iH 

ft 

ft 

F 

S 

ft 

^ 

H 

m 

m 

g 

3 

^ 

<p 

« 

g 

a 

3 
ft 

a 

0. 

•^ 

S 

g    • 

.    5 

s 

2 

2 

R 

_3 

"Si 

_3 

3 
•       ft 

bOblbllbCbil&llbtbDbDbllbllbCbCbCbObObC 


bC       hC       hO       bC 


a     W     H     W     K 


s   > 


in    >>>'-'    s 


IQ         CO         CO 


lO        W5        1-t        ^H         CS|         M 


258       MASS.   EXPERIMENT    STATION   BULLETIN    181. 


Q 

H 

m 

o 
o 

« 

<; 

P 

H 
O 

Q 

12: 


Q 

o 

« 

<     . 
•^   ^ 

II 

Q 
<J 

O 
g 

o 
w 

a: 


55 

<! 
o 


-0 

-• 

o 

O 

o 

o 

5: 

CO 

'J' 

■o 

ira 

-* 

^ 

-<** 

00 

!z: 

C/J 

*"• 

""I 

^^ 

•"• 

^^ 

•-' 

P 

o 

a 

J3 

o 

?i 

I>- 

>o 

<M 

W 

s 

(i. 

^ 

'- 

CO 

(M 

•* 

\n 

■^ 

00 

^ 

Q 

"2 

o 

IM 

o 

CKI 

lO 

g 

•  >-< 

1^ 

t^ 

c^ 

Oi 

00 

^^ 

r^ 

^^ 

c^l 

CO 

^ 

•^ 

•o 

CO 

•* 

or 

Oi 

CQ 

'^ 

^^ 

^^ 

'^ 

" 

'"' 

'^ 

'"' 

^^ 

■"■ 

'^ 

" 

O 

a 

1 

-.J 

o 

o 

o 

lO 

■O 

>o 

lO 

>o 

o 

o 

o 

lO 

"hb 

o 
to 

o 

ci 

T»; 

o 

CO 

o 

CO 

o 

ci 

lO 

^ 

'J" 

H 

■s 

'-^ 

'"' 

*"* 

^^ 

•^ 

'"I 

•"• 

*■* 

•  ' 

'"' 

l— < 

r-i 

m 

bH  (- 

|J 

1  ■ 

s 

•o 

■* 

C5 

CO 

50 

S 

11 

c<r 

<N 

M 

"*- 

"5 

-b^ 

o 

0/ 

a 

13 

3 

a 

s 

« 

3 

a< 

-a 

,^ 

^ 

-M 

T 

' 

wi" 

a 

0. 

0. 

ft 

5= 

e 

a 

S 

O 

a 

o 

fe 

:3 

3 

3 
D. 

ft 

>i 

C8 

c 

c 

•3 
3 

3 

-c 

■c 

?. 

-3 

■73 
3 

T3 
3 

3 

S 

3 

c 

03 

03 

03 

■B 

-d 

T3 

•o 

<4-. 

C3 

m 

m 

- 

S 

S 

S 

S 

£> 

3 

^ 

o 

o 

S^ 

« 

a 

c: 

C 

3 

3 

3 

?? 

u 

Si 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

T) 

■n 

13 

Tl 

•rt 

-D 

•n 

3 

3 

-3 

bC 

6D 

bl 

bC 

3 
03 

3 
03 

3 
C3 

3 
03 

3 
03 

3 
03 

3 
03 

b£ 

"bi 

bC 

>, 

>i 

>. 

>. 

>. 

>. 

>> 

>> 

>. 

>> 

>i 

>^ 

>. 

>i 

>, 

c! 

n 

<A 

OS 

oj 

a 

d 

C3 

03 

£3 

03 

C3 

03 

CS 

^ 

r^ 

A 

^ 

^ 

A 

J3 

J= 

J3 

A 

-C 

^ 

-C 

^ 

^ 

Xi 

^ 

^ 

X. 

J= 

J2 

-3 

^ 

-3 

^ 

^ 

J3 

^ 

J3 

bC 

bO 

bfl 

br 

bn 

Ml 

b^ 

bn 

Ml 

bC 

bC 

bC 

bl 

bl 

bD 

W 

a 

S 

C 

fl 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

W 

W 

w 

W 

W 

w 

w 

w 

w 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

w 

W 

W 

d 

j_; 

,_■ 

j_; 

^• 

^ 

,_; 

> 

> 

,_• 

t> 

>■ 

^■ 

>• 

HH 

^ 

^ 

> 

■d 

M 

n 

■* 

■* 

■o 

•o 

t^ 

oo 

oo 

o 

o 

Cs 

o 

o 

0) 

Ai 

i 

X 

)< 

1^' 

^-i 

X 

X 

X 

>< 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

'A 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

o 

UJ 

DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH   SHEEP. 


259 


s 

it5 

K5 

o 

»o 

■n 

o 

lO 

in 

i>- 

C~ 

O 

»o 

(M 

c^ 

to 

2 

s 

s 

OO 

§ 

OS 
CO 

CO 

50 

o 

'%3 

"5 

•ra 

t^ 

i 

g 

S 

s 

oo 

§ 

00 

oo 

s 

IN 

CO 

g 

O 

■« 

«o 

O 

o 

o 

o 

o 

«? 

o 

o 

o 

o 

Ol 

ira 

U5 

o 

o 

c^ 

CI 

if3 

lO 

J^ 

t-- 

(^ 

^^ 

c^ 

00 

r-.. 

■* 

■* 

•* 

Oi 

,—1 

t^ 

0<3 

■>«< 

^H 

^ 

o 

o 

>o 

o 

in 

•o 

m 

o 

« 

c^ 

o 

o 

t^ 

o 

o 

o 

iO 

<M 

t^ 

J^ 

, 

J^ 

^^ 

CO 

CO 

lO 

^ 

o 

!>. 

oo 

S 

•* 

00 

,—1 

tc 

•^ 

W2 

Oi 

a> 

t^ 

U5 

lO 

ira 

ira 

'^ 

o 

O 

lO 

o 

o 

o 

>o 

« 

o 

o 

in 

w 

t^ 

o 

»o 

(M 

•O 

o 

o 

c^ 

t~" 

w 

f^ 

T-< 

f^ 

00 

1^ 

to 

lO 

CO 

CO 

m 

Ca 

o 

oo 

■«< 

CO 

<Si 

o 

t^ 

■^ 

to 

o 

>n 

■f 

ITS 

to 

'" 

oo 

CD 

o 

oo 

CO 

o 

IM 

s 

iC 

oo 

Oi 

cs 

r* 

CO 

cc 

»o 

n 

^ 

•»J< 

IM 

■* 

cc 

~?. 

'c^ 

1! 

F 

01 

u) 

01 

C3 

01 

03 

tc 

hD 

bC 

a 

a 

a 

a 

a 

a 

c 

^ 

- 

>> 

b 

b 

>> 

>> 

>> 

. 

. 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

03 

Oi 

o 

O 

s 

_> 

_^ 

_> 

_> 

_> 

_> 

p 

R 

P 

o 

0) 

(S 

'■i 

-g 

^ 

•s 

03 

J5 

OJ 

. 

2 

3 

2 

> 

^ 

% 

<!> 

« 

a> 

-s 

a) 

'% 

3 

3 

3 

3 

bC 

Z 

^; 

iz; 

^ 

> 

>■ 

> 

^ 

> 

tn 

•B 

T- 

c 
■a 

a 

03 

-2 

_3 

-2 

_3 

0 
03 

•a 

-rt 

03 

s 

1 
a 

a 

1 

-2 

-3 
a) 

3 
03 
1-1 

•a 
a 

03 

13 
C 
03 

1-1 

_3 

3 
03 

3 
03 

Xi 

3 
c3 

1 

a> 

OJ 

a 

c 

a 

c 

C 

ffi 

c 

13 

^ 
S 

^ 

& 

a 

(U 

a 

a 

3 

_3 

"St 

3 

-a 

_3 
"bi) 

_3 

a 

3 

a 

1 

O 

1 

3 

3 

3 

T! 

T) 

7) 

3 

3 

T) 

-rt 

13 

T3 

T3 

13 

3 

3 

3 

13 

O 
Q. 

a 

O 

M 

bS 

■3) 

03 

03 

•a 

"m 

M 

03 

03 

§ 

03 

Cl 

S 

"3) 

611 

60 

3 

01 

>> 

>. 

>, 

>) 

P>> 

>, 

>, 

>. 

>, 

>, 

>, 

>, 

>. 

>. 

>, 

>, 

>. 

>. 

>> 

>. 

>, 

>. 

>i 

ci 

cs 

03 

03 

a 

03 

03 

03 

03 

ja 

^ 

J5 

^ 

^ 

^ 

j3 

J3 

,C 

J3 

^ 

J3 

,a 

JS 

j: 

,C 

J5 

J3 

JS 

J3 

^ 

^ 

^ 

-C 

X 

J3 

J3 

J3 

^ 

J3 

^ 

X 

J3 

-a 

J3 

^ 

xs 

M 

^ 

J3 

^ 

M 

-3 

60 

61) 

6(1 

6n 

tn 

61) 

6(1 

6(1 

60 

6(1 

6(1 

6(1 

6(1 

6(1 

Ul 

6(1 

6(1 

6(1 

60 

c 

e 

a 

c 

a 

c 

c 

B 

« 

e 

e 

3 

C 

a 

C 

a 

fl 

« 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

W 

W 

U 

W 

W 

W 

W 

w 

w 

w 

W 

w 

N 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

w 

w 

W 

> 

> 

> 

^ 

>■ 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

hH 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

hH 

> 

> 

> 

> 

>• 

l-H 

:: 

- 

- 

SJ 

2 

M 

M 

n 

rt< 

■* 

■* 

- 

- 

- 

^ 

o. 

CO 

oo 

M 

^ 

in 

in 

in 

X 

X 

^ 
X 

^ 
>< 

>< 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 
X 

X 
X 

X 
X 

l-H 

u 

X 

X 
X 

X 
X 

u 

X 

Pi 

X 
X 

X 
X 

260       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181, 


Q 

O 
< 


o 

K 

a 
Ph 

a 
o 


H  -e 


o    s 

Q 
!z; 
<! 

O 

o 

H 

cq 


15 

o 


T3 

o 

o 

0 

0 

*n 

0 

0 

10 

10 

•0 

LO 

0 

^ 

0 

CJ= 

§ 

o 

o 

a 

0 

0 

(M 

(M 

t^ 

0 

C<l 

0 

00 

bC 

CO 

^ 

CO 

CO 

•^ 

0 

si 

C<5 

t-^ 

N 

0 

<si 

CO 

0 

s* 

CO 

CO 

Q 

'S 

lO 

M 

s 

M 

10 

00 

r~ 

t^ 

CO 

c<t 

00 

CI 

Z 

02 

^ 

"^ 

'^ 

'^ 

'"' 

^^ 

^~* 

'^ 

'^ 

*"* 

'^ 

^^ 

*"* 

& 

O 

- 

Q 

^ 

o 

o 

G> 

0 

0 

^ 

0 

0 

0 

0 

Irt 

0 

10 

« 

0 

0 

0 

03 

-jS 

to 

o 

0 

0 

WO 

in 

0 

0 

N 

0 

0 

0 

I- 

bO 

eo 

CO 

oo 

^ 

r~- 

0 

00 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

C» 

<m' 

ai 

1< 

CO 

CO 

s 

s 

§ 

g 

l« 

>o 

00 

CO 

CO 

t-* 

CO 

00 

'N 

CO 

^ 

^ 

o 

p 
o 

■0 

^j 

o 

»o 

>c 

10 

0 

»o 

0 

>o 

0 

UO 

10 

l-O 

in 

■0 

0 

0 

0 

as: 

o 

S 

s 

lO 

«o 

ira 

t^ 

« 

c^ 

CJ 

0 

10 

0 

8" 

£• 

CO 

c^ 

^ 

IC 

c^ 

<i 

0 

oi 

CO 

^ 

C5 

0 

c^ 

c 

CO 

CO 

^ 

tg 

s 

S 

^ 

M 

00 

CO 

t^ 

CO 

c^ 

CO 

■* 

^ 

- 

- 

0 

— 

g 

s 

2 

^ 

o 

o 

o 

0 

0 

W5 

»0 

0 

10 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

u 

^ 

s 

«5 

o 

0 

t>. 

e-1 

10 

t^ 

0 

>ra 

0 

10 

o 

0 

1^ 

in 

1. 

bC 

r^ 

^ 

oo 

f^ 

•^i^ 

0 

^ 

CO 

CO 

c^ 

0 

CO 

CO 

0 

si 

CO 

£? 

3 

E 

1 

»o 

0 

C<l 

CO 

CO 

CO 

'^ 

'^ 

t>- 

2 

^ 

c^ 

^ 

c^ 

m 

(0 

-5 

Ci 

CO 

CO 

•# 

00 

00 

00 

0 

jS 

0 

s 

ci  a 

S'~' 

05 

m 

<rs 

C5 

<M 

fe 

00 

0 

M" 

ca 

i 

o 

3 
O 

oo 

O 

o_ 

- 

CO 

0 

CO 

0 

l« 

-" 

- 

00 

^- 

t^ 

S- 

e<r 

u 

ro 

C 

C 

C 

'i 

■g 

■3 

hO 

bi 

Ml 

C3 

C3 

c 

03 

_S 

1 

- 

a 

0 

bO 

7^ 

1 

3 

a 

c 

03 

C3 

C8 

0 

0 

0 

"c 

a 

C! 

^ 

■0 

s 

u 

0 

c« 

03 

03 

•^ 

■« 

■a 

Tl 

•w 

-a 

•^ 

C! 

c 

a 

C 

s 

? 

■73 

t3 

es 

c3 

a 

C3 

03 

t4 
0 

0 

t4 
0 

c3 

c3 

c3 

03 

? 

S 

■5 

■5 

"B 

O 

o 

0 

ffl 

& 

0 

0 

0 

0 

s 

H 

s 

s 

•s 

s 

E 

H 

« 

pa 

^ 

uT 

-3 

» 

c 

c 

c 

c 

c 

s 

^ 

^ 

^ 

3 

3 

3 

© 

a> 

0 

» 

0 

^ 

0 

0 

S 

0 

0 

p^ 

^ 

_3 

^ 

3 

^ 

*i 

^ 

•z 

12: 

a 

"a 

"3) 

"bi 

"S 

"bb 

"3 

"bb 

•v 

T} 

T) 

p 

•B 

^■■ 

J3" 

J= 

j£ 

js" 

j£ 

a 

c3 

a 

c3 

3 

ti 

0 

0 

1 

3 

g 

IM 

s 

£ 

2 

S 

t3 

13 

13 

"bb 

"bb 

13 

^ 

03 

s 

c3 

ea 

03 

Ol 

*^ 

■^ 

•w 

<s 

•2 

0 

03 

c3 

0 

0 

tn 

CO 

© 

<u 

o 

o 

0 

0 

0 

0 

c 

c 

C 

s: 

3 

3 

— 

"S 

rt 

1 

1 

0 

(U 

-2 

» 

"Si 

"tb 

2 

5 
o 

o 

0 

0 

0 

0 

"3 

3 

"3 

13 

a 

03 

13 
C 
03 

■B 

"C 

3 

a 

ft 

a 

a 

ft 

ft 

■3) 

"Si 

"bb 

s 

5 

"3) 

>i 

>; 

>; 

t^ 

>, 

t^ 

!^ 

>, 

>i 

>, 

>J 

>> 

>> 

>> 

>. 

>. 

^ 

s 

C3 

a 

es 

03 

03 

C3 

as 

ci 

03 

03 

03 

C« 

03 

C3 

cj 

C3 

J3 

.£; 

M 

-H 

■C 

J3 

J3 

Ji 

J3 

J= 

Si 

S3 

-a 

^ 

H 

si 

« 

J3 

^ 

X. 

J3 

JS 

,i3 

"S 

J= 

"3 

"m 

"S 

"m 

-C 

"m 

J3 

■7 

"m 

•  S 

'bb 

bH 

bC 

bi) 

"3) 

bO 

bC 

bD 

bO 

U) 

bO 

bO 

bt 

bO 

tD 

bD 

to 

e 

a 

C 

S 

c 

a 

a 

a 

fl 

a 

n 

C 

c 

S 

C 

s 

a 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

H 

W 

W 

W 

W 

H 

W 

W 

f^ 

W 

d 

>■ 

> 

> 

>■ 

> 

> 

>■ 

> 

X 

X 

X 

>' 

> 

> 

> 

> 

-C 

m 

-3 

o 

to 

o 

CO 

t^ 

t~ 

t^ 

00 

CO 

00 

0 

05 

05 

0 

0 

- 

-H 

C^l 

hH 

hH 

hH 

^. 

hH 

^ 

^. 

^. 

^ 

„. 

„. 

i 

>< 

>< 

>< 

X 

1^ 

>< 

>^ 

x 

>< 

X 

><! 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

"S 

X 

X 

><! 

M 

X 

X 

X 

M 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

!» 

DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH   SHEEP.  261 


§ 

o 

■o 

o 

o 

«ra 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

>n 

o 

•15 

o 

O 

§ 

«o 

o 

<M 

•o 

o 

«5 

^ 

[^ 

_< 

r>. 

o 

c^ 

o^ 

wo 

CO 

t^ 

Cl 

t^ 

^H 

CO 

o 

(5) 

00 

•^ 

•^ 

■^ 

o 

o 

o 

o 

in 

•o 

o 

o 

K5 

"5 

r- 

(N 

ira 

lO 

o 

o 

UO 

"5 

t^ 

<M 

(M 

1^ 

cc 

f^ 

,^ 

o 

o 

^^ 

00 

o> 

>o 

^ 

oo 

CO 

r^ 

o 

•* 

,^ 

o 

CO 

IM 

iO 

CO 

-* 

CO 

•* 

00 

■o 

■* 

o 

o 

tfl 

o 

in 

"0 

m 

lO 

o 

O 

o 

1(5 

t^ 

C<l 

lO 

o 

C<1 

»o 

c^ 

oo 

o 

oo 

f^ 

lO 

^ 

oo 

CO 

00 

CO 

CO 

05 

o 

t^ 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

"5 

« 

o 

o 

f^ 

lO 

lO 

lO 

»o 

lo 

lO 

o 

t* 

t>- 

o 

U5 

o 

00 

o 

C<l 

t^ 

lO 

,_, 

5! 

00 

■* 

U2 

o 

CM 

t-. 

lO 

00 

CO 

M 

M 

CJ 

<M 

o 

(M 

b- 

00 

in 

03 

^ 

o 

»— " 

oo 

00 

o 

»— ' 

CO 

o 

CO 

C-) 

<M 

CM 

CO 

CM 

cf 

^      ^        b£       bC 


CO      W       M      CO 


§    s 


.2     .2     .2     .2     .3     .2     .S     .2     .2     .2     .2     .2     .2     .2      o      =i      g      s     .2     .2     .2     .2     .2 
'ti'5)'ii'3)'3i'3)     bo'ab'iib'M'Hb'bo'M'M'a     is     -v     13     '3i'3)'3i'3)'m 

WaHWHWWHWWWBWWcomccaiWWWWH 


„.  >-*      f^      t-i      ?S      i-l      ?S      K^      t-i      *->      r^      l-H      1^      *-* 


COCOCO'^-*}*»-l*-(CMCMCOCO 


><    r^-    ><    '^    >^    >^    y,    y^    i^^    y^    i^^    i^    ^^    ^    i^    X    X    X    X    X    X    X    X 


262       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 


o 

K 
> 

Q 


o 

« 
a 


o 

o  ^ 

Q  ?: 
H  ^ 
a 
< 

5 

z 

o 


!? 
< 


a 


»0    iC    lO    UD 


lO   W5   "5   lO 


lO   »c   »o 


■rt    CO    ^ 


OO    »0    OS 


00   03   OO   Oi   00 


CQ 


cc^ 


^H     t>-     CO     40     CD 

O    CO    Oi    00    05 


00   CO    eO    00 


00    00   fM    CO 


—<      n      ■^ 


(M    "-I    -^ 


«   « 


Q  Q 


Hww<;-sjww-j;<; 


m  CO  H  H 


a  s  s  s  tn  >^ 


ki  :^  ^ 


X  5  K 


O   »-«    -^ 


(N    (M    CO   CO 


»ft   »o   <:o 


DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH    SHEEP. 


263 


O 

O 


a. 

o 
CJ 

a 
K 
H 


o 


< 

< 
Q 

1 

P-, 

"" 

> 

Y^ 

i 

- 

^ 

t-H 

X 

- 

>■ 

i> 

> 

ki 

-3  " 
gX 

- 

a 

02 

w 

Hj 

d 

d 

d 

M 

d 

X 

1^ 

x^ 

X 

X 

X 

X 
X 

O 

CO 

> 

> 

>^ 

1 

>< 

X 

>< 

>^ 

X 

X 

x 

X 

CO 

O 

f^ 

1 

c» 

t^ 

CO 

CO 

oo 

Ci 

k-O 

o 

f.. 

CO 

QO 

i^ 

■<Ji 

■^ 

CO 

•^ 

•o 

lO 

Tti 

lO 

-^ 

■^ 

■cl< 

-S 

IE 

«• 

_>. 

s  ^ 

r^ 

r^ 

rvi 

Q 

CO 

CO 

o 

C-1 

CO 

■M 

in 

lO 

„ 

0 

_ 

.(3 

o 

o 

to 

CD 

o 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

**■   X 

.    d 

z 

W 

m    0 
d    g 

<»  Xi 

g    0 

o 

o 

c^ 

1 

(M 

CO 

•^ 

?0 

frH      ^^ 

^ 

t^ 

o 

o 

O 

o 

CO 

o 

CO 

t^ 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

0.  2 

E 

^     03 

c 

3 

o 

^ 

i« 

CI 

, 

,^ 

ira 

00 

'M 

^ 

-rH 

o 

■^ 

,_, 

eo 

05 

Q       ^ 

to 

o 

o 

lO 

»o 

•o 

CO 

i-O 

CO 

'(I 

■* 

CO 

■s  " 

£ 

.2  "oj 

I.S 

•-C 

.^ 

CO 

oo 

1 

C-l 

.^ 

^J 

CO 

CO 

LO 

o 

o 

r^ 

y^ 

05 

§1 

< 

CO 

•^ 

« 

(M 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

OO 

■^ 

■<s^ 

eo 

0;     c3 

So  "S 

03     i" 

m     C 

Eh' 

>     0 

iH  is 

in 

>o 

o 

o 

o 

c» 

CO 

o 

■* 

f. 

CO 

C^l 

C5 

f. 

t^ 

<    0 

o 

>o 

CO 

lO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

10 

10 

0 

M     ^ 

1^ 

c 

o 

^ 

"tl 

•T3 

— r 

■d 

-: 

■X 

-6 

C 

a> 

01 

o 

0 

cS 

0) 

o 

o 

3 

0 

^' 

o 

j= 

rt 

s 

2 

c 

d 

a> 

p 

o 

0 

H 

c3 

^ 

3 

_3 

"5 

^ 

_d 

/v> 

a 

"m 

"m 

Ti 

■3 

"Si 

J 

-e 

-d 

^ 

-^ 

■c 

<: 

o 

fl 

c 

c 

3 

d 

o 

03 

03 

03 

03 

03 

^ 

m 

>> 

t^ 

>; 

X 

^ 

>> 

>. 

>> 

>. 

>> 

>, 

>> 

>, 

>. 

>. 

ca 

C3 

c« 

03 

c3 

c3 

c3 

03 

C3 

03 

s 

e3 

03 

-C 

X. 

A 

_g 

J= 

A 

J= 

A 

J2 

JS 

A 

A 

j:2 

J3 

Xi 

J= 

-C, 

_-J2 

j2 

A 

^ 

^ 

^ 

A 

^ 

X. 

.22 

ro 

.2 

m 

.2 

M 

c3  2 

.2 

.2 

w 

.2 

•  2 

.2 

.2 

.^ 

c 

Ml 

M 

M 

■«) 

M 

it 

bD 

M 

bO 

bO 

M 

so 

M 

M 

C 

C 

a 

o 

ci 

C 

e 

d 

a 

C 

a 

c 

OJ    S 

H 

w 

W 

O 

W 

W 

w 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

W 

•^'"   CO 

1— I 

> 

1 

^ 

^ 

r 

^ 

^' 

d  d 

c« 
> 

> 

> 

H 

> 

> 

0.  c 

d 

2 

J" 

> 

h- 1 

> 

> 

m" 

kJ 

•d 

5 

-3 
c 

cS 

> 

-a 
d 

03 

■a 

3 

<m"  n 
in  >r3 

d    6 

d    d 

M 

-a 

a 

e8 

HH 

1 

. 

03 

i 

c 

> 

> 

3 

> 

> 

«• 

> 

«' 

> 

> 

> 

> 

t-H 

> 

> 

> 

^  2 

"3  3 

CO 

PQ  CQ 

_; 

-- 

CO 

0    0 

1 

>o 

C3 

c3 

-«•" 

oo" 

3 

10 

-a 

00 

-0 

"    =* 

53 

CO 

o 

o 

50 

N 

C3 

3 

1 

^_ 

=-1 

d 

03 

d 

03 

■* 

CO 

CM 

^ 

in 

M 

CO 

•^ 

0 

" 

"^ 

eo 

_0J 

w 

^ 

X 

X 

X 

>^ 

d 

X 

>^' 

X 

X 

X 

X 

k^ 

►> 

t— 1 

V 

»> 

•> 

^v^ 

^j^ 

('I 

/s 

> 

> 

t^ 

p. 

><! 

'A 

>< 

X 

/i 

/1 

ri 

ri 

ri 

X 

X 

•Ji 

><: 

X 

264       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 


O 


O 

o 

o 


o 

<; 

H 
Ell 

o 
O 


-«1 


CQ 


o 

U 

o 

H 

o 


__ 

« 

-<; 

.2 

K 

►-'         C 

Pi 

1=! 

S 

•"^ 

2 

Q 

1 

Pi 

i> 

x; 

,_• 

h-!        M 

i_; 

^ 

,_; 

K-I 

„• 

P 
O 

k1 

1 

XI 

)— 1 

X! 
X! 

1— 1 

XI 
X! 

>< 

X 

3: 

1 

0      — . 

0 

>o 

« 

CO 

CO        iC 

10 

tP 

-* 

■* 

C      -w" 

(U         o 

C>1 

0 

CI         -^ 

>o 

0 

CO 

0 

0 

0 

0 

t^ 

0 

CO 

CO 

CO 

-!-=■■"  X 

S   K 

CO 

1 

00         CO 

in 

0 

00 

CO 

J2 

^ 

CO        CO 

CO 

E 

a 

(U 

-i* 

1 

CO        CO 

00 

o 

-T 

t^      10 

t^ 

«5 

~II5 

Tt< 

>o 

S 

Ph 

JS 

CO 

1 

■^       r- 

00 

00 

U5 

CO 

< 

^         CO 

CO 

■* 

-;t< 

^ 

C 

>>  * 

lO       0 

(M 

00 

05 

P| 

«o 

0 

t^         "O 

•^ 

CO 

CD 

10 

>c 

^ 

_^ 

M 

c 

ci 

0 

J= 

.2 

5-] 

O 

c? 

c 

0 

H 

(S 

"cj 

"m 

03 

a  •■ 

C3 

m 

>> 

r^ 

>. .  >> 

>. 

>, 

>; 

!^ 

>> 

C3 

0 

C3--  03 

C« 

03 

c3 

03 

Cj 

A 

-g^ 

-a 

A 

A 

A 

J3 

X. 

■fi  £-« 

.a 

A 

A 

J3 

^ 

^ 

;3  fl:3 

:S 

a 

;3 

■^ 

.S 

"hi 

"So  o3"3i 

"3) 

bD 

bO 

bH 

"3} 

C 

0 

c  *^  c 

c 

fl 

a 

a 

a 

W 

0 

W     H 

W 

w 

W 

W 

W 

1 

r     J 

J 

>     > 

_ 

. 

r 

H 

c, 

-3      "S 

'    . 

,_J 

^ 

>< 

X 

> 

> 

^3 

M 

J 

1 

>       > 

13 

§ 

c 

03 

a 

oi 

> 

>       >■ 

> 

> 

xi 

1— 1 

X 

* 

-d 

»-H 

_o 

CO 

c 

Ph 

"2     "c 

13 
C 

C3 

C3 
0 

c-f 

rj. 

ITS 

0     S 

"^ 

OS 

,— 1 

»-4 

I-I 

>< 

X! 
XI 

>< 

>< 

DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH   SHEEP. 


265 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients. 

Series  XVIII.,  Mangels,  Period  3. 

Sheep  V. 


Item. 

< 

a 
2 

0* 

a 

■    0- 

t 

5  a 

4J 

400  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
1,400  grams  mangels  fed. 

347.00 
228.76 

19.67 
13.57 

34.25 
12.03 

109.51 
13.63 

174.24 
188.89 

9.33 
.64 

Amount  consumed, 

Minus  159.94  grams  feces  excreted, 

575.76 
151.42 

33.24 
23.98 

46.28 
19.06 

123.14 
35.67 

363.13 
65.43 

9.97 

7.28 

Amount  digested,  .... 
Minus  hay  digested. 

424.34 
225.55 

9.26 
9.05 

27.22 
22.26 

87.47 
73.37 

297.70 
116.76 

2.69 
4.29 

Mangels  digested 

Per  cent,  digested. 

198.79 

86.90 

.21 
1.55 

4.96 
41.21 

14.10 
103.45 

180.94 
95.79 

- 

Sheep  VI. 

Amount  consumed  as  above, 
Minus  155.50  grams  feces  excreted, 

575.76 
147.21 

33.24 
21.73 

46.26 
17.86 

123.14 
35.62 

363.13 
64.49 

9.97 
7.51 

Amount  digested,  .... 
Minus  hay  digested. 

428.55 
225.55 

11.51 
9.05 

28.42 
22.26 

87.52 
73.37 

298.64 
116.76 

2  46 
4.29 

Mangels  digested 

Per  cent,  digested, 

203.00 
88.74 

2.46 
18.12 

6.16 
51.18 

14.15 
103.81 

181.88 
96.29 

~ 

Average  per  cent,  digested,     . 

87.82 

9.84 

46.20 

103.73 

96.04 

- 

Series  XVIII.,  Cabbage  (Heads),  Period  4, 
Sheep  I. 


400  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
1,600  grams  cabbage  (heads)  fed,  . 

357.40 
154.56 

18.80 
12.70 

33.06 
27.79 

111.97 
15.21 

184.06 
97.02 

9.51 
1.84 

Amount  consumed, 

Minus  131.90  grams  feces  excreted. 

511.96 
125.34 

31.50 
15.44 

60.85 
17.08 

127.18 
29.82 

281 .08 
57.67 

11.35 
5.33 

Amount  digested 

Miniis  hay  digested, 

386.62 
232.31 

16.06 
5.83 

43.77 
20.17 

97.36 

78.38 

223.41 
123.32 

6.02 
5.04 

Cabbage  digested. 
Per  cent,  digested. 

154.31 
99.84 

10.23 
80.55 

23.60 
84.92 

18.98 
124.79 

100.09 
103.16 

.98 
53.26 

266       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  —  Continued. 

Series  XVIII.,  Cabbage  (Heads),  Period  4  —  Concluded. 

Sheep  II. 


Item. 

J3 
< 

a 
'S 

1 

u 

o 

£ 

Co 

as 

.11 

Amount  consumed  as  above. 
Minus  138.19  grams  feces  excreted, 

511.96 
131.56 

31.50 
16.27 

60.85 
16.64 

127.18 
33.63 

281.08 
59.30 

11.35 

5.72 

Amount  digested, 

Minus  hay  digested, 

380.40 
232.31 

15.23 
5.83 

44.21 
20.17 

93.55 
78.38 

221.78 
123.32 

5.63 
5.04 

Cabbage  digested,           ..... 
Per  cent,  digested, 

148.09 
95.81 

9.40 
74.02 

24.04 
86.51 

15.17 
99.74 

98.46 
101.48 

.59 
32.07 

Average  per  cent,  digested. 

97.83 

77.29 

85.72 

112.32 

102.32 

42.67 

Series  XVIII.,  Cabbage  (Leaves),  Period  5. 
Sheep  I. 


400  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
1,200  grams  cabbage  fleaves)  fed. 
Amount  consumed. 
Minus  186.23  grams  feces  excreted. 
Amount  digested,  .... 
Minus  hay  digested, 
Cabbage  digested. 
Per  cent,  digested, 


355.20 
228.60 


583.80 
177.27 


406.53 
230.88 


175.65 
76.84 


20.32 
33.12 


53.44 
32.00 


21.44 
6.30 


15.14 
45.71 


33.64 
27.29 


60.93 
22.21 


38.72 
20.52 


18.20 
66.69 


111.82 
29.99 


141.81 
39.35 


102.46 
78.27 


24.19 

80.66 


179.08 
132.69 


311.77 
75.84 


235.93 
119.98 


115.95 

87.38 


10.34 
5.51 


15.85 
7.87 


7.98 
5.48 


2.50 
45.37 


Sheep  II. 


Amount  consumed  as  above. 

583 .80 

53.44 

60.93 

141.81 

311.77 

15.85 

Minus  199.50  grams  feces  excreted. 

189.72 

32.46 

23.79 

40.81 

83.91 

8.75 

Amount  digested 

394.08 

20.98 

37.14 

101.00 

227.86 

7.10 

Minus  hay  digested, 

230.88 

6.30 

20.52 

78.27 

119.98 

5.48 

Cabbage  digested, 

163.20 

14.68 

16.62 

22.73 

107.88 

1.62 

Per  cent,  digested, 

71.39 

44.23 

60.90 

75.79 

81.30 

29.40 

Average  per  cent,  digested,     . 

74.12 

44.97 

63.80 

78.23 

84.34 

37.39 

DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH   SHEEP. 


267 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  —  Continued. 

Series  XVIII.,  Mangels,  Period  6. 

Sheep  V. 


Item. 


400  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
1,800  grains  mangels  fed, 
Amount  consumed, 
Minus  179.45  grams  feces  excreted. 
Amount  digested,  .        .        .        . 
Minus  hay  digested ,       .        .        . 
Mangels  digested,  .        .        .        . 
Per  cent,  digested. 


355:68 
312.84 


23.23 
19.65 


33.40 
20.08 


115.06 
21.30 


174.67 
251 .00 


668.52 
170.08 


42.88 
24.07 


53.48 
22.06 


136.36 
40.19 


425.67 
74.20 


498.44 
231.19 


18.81 
10.69 


31.42 
21,71 


96.17 
77.09 


351.47 
117.03 


267.25 
85.43 


8.12 
41.31 


9.71 
48.36 


19.08 
89.58 


234.44 
93.40 


9.32 

.81 


10.13 
9.56 


.57 
4.29 


Sheep  VI. 


Amount  consumed  as  above. 
Minus  173.44  grams  feces  excreted. 
Amount  consumed. 
Minus  hay  digested. 
Mangels  digested,  . 
Per  cent,  digested. 

Average  per  cent,  digested. 


668.52 
164.54 


503.98 
231.19 


272.79 
87.20 


81.32 


42.88 
21.90 


20.98 
10.69 


10.29 
52.36 


46.84 


53.48 
19.12 


34.36 
21.71 


12.65 
63.00 


55.68 


136.36 
41.10 


95.26 
77.09 


18.17 
85.31 


87.45 


425.67 
73.52 


352.15 
117.03 


235.12 
93.67 


93.58 


10.13 
8.90 


1.23 
4  29 


Series  XVIII.,  Turnips  (Swedish),  Period  7. 
Sheep  V. 


400  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 

356.28 

23.12 

33.21 

111.41 

179.03 

9.51 

1,600  grams  turnips  fed,         .... 

220.64 

16.17 

21.14 

24.25 

157.34 

1.74 

Amount  consumed, 

576.92 

39.29 

54.35 

135.66 

336.37 

11.25 

Minus  156.48  grams  feces  excreted. 

149.45 

19.70 

17.93 

39.74 

66.19 

5.89 

Amount  digested, 

427.47 

19.59 

36.42 

95.92 

270.18 

5.36 

Minus  hay  digested, 

231 .58 

10.64 

21.59 

74.64 

119.95 

4.37 

Turnips  digested, 

195.89 

8.95 

14.83 

21.28 

150.23 

.99 

Per  cent,  digested, 

88.78 

55.34 

70.15 

87.75 

95.48 

56.90 

268       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  —  Continued. 

Series  XVIII.,  Turnips  (Swedish),  Period  7  —  Concluded. 
Sheep  VI. 


Item. 

Q 

J3 
< 

a 

'B 

2 

p- 

S 

a  o 

2t? 

.tea 

rt 

fe 

Amount  consumed  as  above, 
Minus  155.75  grams  feces  excreted, 

•576.92 
148.59 

39.29 
20.34 

54.35 
15.62 

135.66 
42,70 

336.37 
64.37 

11.25 
5.56 

Amount  digested 

Minus  hay  digested, 

428.33 
231.58 

18.95 
10.64 

38.73 
21.59 

92.96 
74.64 

272.00 
119.95 

5.69 
4.37 

Turnips  digested, 

Per  cent,  digested, 

196.75 
89.17 

8.31 
51.38 

17.14 

81.08 

18,32 
75,55 

152.05 
96.64 

1.32 
75.86 

Average  per  cent,  digested. 

88.98 

53.36 

75.62 

81.65 

96.06 

66.38 

Series  XIX.,  English  Hay  and  Gluten  Feed,  ^Gluten  Feed,  Period  2. 

Sheep  V. 


550  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
150  grams  gluten  feed  fed. 

484.11 
134.33 

28.22 
1.41 

46.09 
37.40 

152.01 
11.75 

246.80 
77.62 

10.99 
6.15 

Amount  consumed. 

Minus  226.53  grams  feces  excreted. 

618.44 
209.47 

29.63 
19.38 

83.49 
26.79 

163.76 
57.86 

324.42 
97.92 

17.14 
7.52 

Amount  digested,  .... 
Minus  hay  digested, 

408.97 
285.62 

10.25 
7.90 

56.70 
23.97 

105.90 
94.25 

226.50 
153.02 

9.62 
5.16 

Gluten  feed  digested,     . 
Per  cent,  ration  digested. 

123.35 
66.13 

2.35 
34.59 

32.73 
67.91 

11.65 
64.67 

73.48 
69.82 

4.46 
56.13 

Per  cent,  gluten  feed  digested. 

91.80 

167.00 

87.60 

99.00 

94.70 

72.50 

Sheep  VI. 


Amount  consumed  as  above. 
Minus  223  grams  feces  excreted,     . 

618.44 
206.48 

29.63 
21.62 

83.49 
26.06 

163.76 
54.70 

324.42 
96.65 

17.14 

7.45 

Amount  digested, 

Minus  hay  digested, 

411.96 
285.62 

8.01 
7.90 

57.43 
23.97 

109.06 
94.25 

227,77 
153.02 

9.69 
5.16 

Gluten  feed  digested, 

Per  cent,  ration  digested,       .         .         .         . 

126.34 
66.61 

.11 
27.03 

33.46 
68.79 

14.81 
66.60 

74.75 
70.21 

4.53 
56.53 

Per  cent,  gluten  feed  digested. 

94.70 

.78 

89.50 

126.00 

96.30 

73.60 

Average  per  cent,  gluten  feed  digested,   . 

93.25 

83.89 

88.50 

112.50 

95.50 

73.05 

Average  per  cent,  ration  digested,  . 

66.37 

30.81 

68.35 

65.64 

70.02 

56.33 

DIGESTION    EXPERIMENTS   WITH    SHEEP. 


269 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  —  Continued. 

Series  XIX.,  English  Hay,  Period  3. 

Sheep  I. 


Item. 

Q 

< 

o 
Cm 

E 

0/ 

O  -JJ 

2: 

800  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
Minus  296.19  grams  feces  excreted. 

696.00 
279.99 

40.79 
32.39 

65.77 
33.49 

215.34 
75.71 

358.51 

128.80 

15.59 
9.60 

English  hay  digested 

Per  cent,  digested, 

416.01 
59.77 

8.40 
20.59 

32.28 
49.08 

139.63 
64.84 

229.71 
64.07 

5.99 
38.42 

Sheep  II. 


800  grams  English  hay  fed 

Minus  315.10  grams  feces  excreted. 

696.00 

294.78 

40.79 
31.04 

65.77 
30.83 

215.34 
88.43 

358.51 
134.84 

15.59 
9.64 

English  hay  digested, 

Per  cent,  digested, 

401 .22 
57.65 

9.75 
23.90 

34.94 
53.12 

126.91 
58.93 

223.67 
62.39 

5.95 
38.17 

Average  per  cent,  digested,     . 

58.71 

22.25 

51.10 

61.89 

63.23 

38.30 

Series  XIX.,  Pumpkins  (Seeds  removed).  Period  4. 
Sheep  I. 


500  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
2,000  grams  pumpkins  fed,    . 

437.35 
108.40 

25.85 
9.55 

41.20 
14.89 

137.68 
18.79 

222.04 
62.39 

10.58 
2.78 

Amount  consumed. 

Minus  180.47  grams  feces  excreted. 

545.75 
169.30 

35.40 

19.67 

56.09 
21.30 

156.47 
45.27 

284.43 
76.54 

13.36 
6.52 

Amount  digested,  .... 
Minus  hay  digested, 

376.45 
258.04 

15.73 
5.69 

34.79 
21.01 

111.20 
85.36 

207.89 
139.89 

6.84 
4.02 

Pumpkins  digested, 
Per  cent,  digested. 

118.41 
109.23 

10.04 
105.13 

13.78 
92.55 

25.84 
137.52 

68.00 
108.99 

2.82 
101.44 

Sheep  II. 


Amount  consumed  as  above. 
Minus  198.05  grams  feces  excreted. 

545.75 
185.99 

35.40 
24.03 

56.09 
21.09 

156.47 
53.23 

284.43 
80.63 

13.36 
7.01 

Amount  digested, 

Minus  hay  digested, 

359.76 
258.04 

11.37 
5.69 

35.00 
21.01 

103.24 
85.36 

203.80 
139.89 

6.35 
4.02 

Pumpkins  digested, 

Per  cent,  digested, 

101.72 
93.84 

5.68 
59.48 

13.99 
93.96 

17.88 
95.16 

63.91 
102.44 

2.33 
83.81 

Average  per  cent,  digested,     . 

101.54 

82.31 

93.26 

116.34 

105.72 

92.63 

270       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 

Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  —  Continued. 

Series  XIX.,  Vegetable  Ivory  Meal,  Period  5. 

Sheep  V. 


Item. 

<u 
03 

>> 

0 

< 

B 
'S 

1 

C 

as 

1 

550  grams  English  hay  fed,    .... 

150  grams  gluten  feed  fed 

200  grams  vegetable  ivory  meal  fed, 

484.28 
134.90 
174.72 

28.14 
1.50 
2.39 

45.67 
36.37 
10.52 

153.52 
11.74 
12.27 

245.91 
79.97 
148.33 

11.04 
5.32 
1.21 

Amount  consumed, 

Minus  252.10  grams  feces  excreted. 

793.90 
237.73 

32.03 
21.78 

92.56 
37.09 

177.53 
61.71 

474.21 
107.74 

17.57 
9.41 

Amount  digested 

Minus  English  hay  and  gluten  feed  digested. 

556.17 
408.66 

10.25 
9.19 

55.47 
55.79 

115.82 
109.07 

366.47 
228.12 

8.16 
9.16 

Vegetable  ivory  meal  digested. 

Per  cent,  digested, 

147.51 
84.43 

1.06 
44.35 

- 

6.75 
55.01 

138.35 
93.27 

- 

Sheep  VI. 


Amount  consumed  as  above, 
Minus  241.94  grams  feces  excreted, 

793.90 
228.63 

32.03 

22.41 

92.56 
33.61 

177.53 
57.93 

474.21 
106.82 

17.57 
7.86 

Amount  digested, 

Minus  English  hay  and  gluten  feed  digested. 

565.27 
408.66 

9.62 
9.19 

58.95 
55.79 

119.60 
109.07 

367.39 
228.12 

9.71 
9.16 

Vegetable  ivory  meal  digested. 

Per  cent,  digested, 

156.61 
89.63 

.43 
17.99 

3.16 
30.04 

10.53 

85.82 

139.27 
93.89 

.55 
45.45 

Average  per  cent,  digested,     . 

87.03 

31.17 

30.04 

70.42 

93.58 

45.451 

Series  XIX.,  Pumpkins  (Entire),  Period  6. 
Sheep  I. 


650  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
2,000  grams  pumpkins  fed,    . 

483.29 
176.20 

26.82 
13.39 

43.50 
31.22 

151.46 
29.71 

248.51 
76.01 

13.00 
25.87 

Amount  consumed. 

Minus  253.33  grams  feces  excreted. 

659.49 
240.66 

40.21 
25.63 

74.72 
30.52 

181.17 
69.51 

324.52 
105.98 

38.87 
9.02 

Amount  digested 

Minus  hay  digested. 

418.83 
285.14 

14.58 
5.90 

44.20 
22.19 

111.66 
93.91 

218.54 
156.56 

29.85 
4.94 

Pumpkins  digested, 
Per  cent,  digested, 

133.69 
75.87 

8.68 
64.82 

22.01 
70.50 

17.75 
59.74 

61.98 
81.54 

24.91 
96.29 

'  One  sheep  only. 


DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH   SHEEP. 


271 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  —  Continued. 

Series  XIX.,  Pumpkins  (Entire),  Period  6  —  Concluded. 

Sheep  II. 


Item. 

o 

a 
S 
2 

"St 

a>  c3 

£ 

Amount  consumed  as  above, 
Minus  228.69  grams  feces  excreted, 

659.49 
216.96 

40.21 

25.75 

74.72 
27.34 

181.17 
61.62 

324.52 
93.38 

38.87 
8.87 

Amount  digested 

Minus  hay  digested, 

442.53 
285.14 

14.46 
5.90 

47.38 
22.19 

119.55 
93.91 

231.14 
156.56 

30.00 
4.94 

Pumpkins  digested, 

Fer  cent,  digested, 

157.39 
89.32 

8.56 
63.93 

25.19 
80.69 

25.64 
86.30 

74.58 
98.12 

25.06 
96.87 

Average  per  cent,  digested,     . 

82.60 

64.38 

75.60 

73.02 

89.83 

96.58 

Series  XIX.,  Cabbage  (Whole),  Period  7. 
Sheep  I. 


450  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
1,600  grams  cabbage  fed. 

398.57 
187.68 

22.16 
22.90 

32.48 
40.95 

126.86 
19.33 

207.42 
100.90 

9.65 
3.60 

Amount  consumed. 

Minus  192.77  grams  feces  excreted. 

586.25 
183.40 

45.06 
26.50 

73.43 
22.23 

146.19 
46.36 

308.32 
81.29 

13.25 
7.02 

Amount  digested,  .... 
Minus  hay  digested, 

402.85 
235.16 

18.56 

4.88 

51.20 
16.56 

99.83 
78.65 

227.03 
130.67 

6.23 
3.67 

Cabbage  digested. 
Per  cent,  digested, 

167.69 
89.35 

13.68 
59.74 

34.64 
84.59 

21.18 
109.57 

96.36 
95.50 

2.56 
71.11 

Sheep  II. 


Amount  consumed  as  above. 
Minus  200.09  grams  feces  excreted, 

586.25 
189.95 

45.06 

27.77 

73.43 
20.97 

146.19 
53.53 

308.32 
80.56 

13.25 
7.12 

Amount  digested 

Minus  hay  digested 

396.30 
233.98 

17.29 
4.88 

52.46 
16.56 

92.66 
78.65 

227.76 
130.67 

6.13 
3.67 

Cabbage  digested, 

Per  cent,  digested, 

162.32 
86.49 

12.41 
54.19 

35.90 
87.67 

14.01 

72.48 

97.09 
96.22 

2.46 
68.33 

Average  per  cent,  digested,      . 

87.92 

56.97 

86.13 

91.03 

95.86 

69.72 

272       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 


Table  V.  • —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  —  Continued. 

Series  XIX.,  Carrots,  Period  8. 
Sheep  I. 


Item. 

u 

< 

a 
S 
2 

o 

li 

.t2H 

fcl 

500  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
1,500  grams  carrots  fed, 

443.75 

188.10 

25.43 
16.10 

36.08 
15.05 

153.80 

15.52 

218.41 
139.27 

10.03 
2.16 

Amount  consumed. 

Minus  211.46  grams  feces  excreted, 

631.85 
202.45 

41.53 
30.55 

51.13 
24.90 

169.32 
53.49 

357.68 
86.85 

12.19 
6.66 

Amount  digested 

Minus  hay  digested, 

449.40 
261.81 

10.98 
5.59 

26.23 
18.40 

115.83 
95.36 

270.83 
137.60 

5.53 
3.81 

Carrots  digested 

Per  cent,  digested, 

167.59 
89.10 

5.39 
33.48 

7.83 
52.03 

20.47 
131.89 

133.23 
95.66 

1.72 
79.63 

Sheep  II. 


Amount  consxmaed  as  above. 
Minus  194.84  grams  feces  excreted. 

631.85 
186.79 

41.53 

28.47 

51.13 
21.01 

169.32 
49.97 

357.68 
80.93 

12.19 
6.41 

Amount  digested 

Miniis  hay  digested, 

445.06 
261.81 

13.06 
5.59 

30.12 
18.40 

119.35 
95.36 

276.75 
137.60 

5.78 
3.81 

Carrots  digested, 

Per  cent,  digested, 

183.25 
94.42 

7.47 
46.40 

11.72 

77.87 

23.99 
154.57 

139.15 
99.91 

1.97 
91.20 

Average  per  cent,  digested. 

93.26 

39.94 

64.95 

143.23 

97.79 

85.42 

Series  XIX.,  English  Hay,  Period  9. 
Sheep  V. 


800  grams  English  hay  fed 

Minus  294.67  grams  feces  excreted,  ■ 

710.00 
279.97 

40.75 
27.10 

60.49 
28.11 

221.66 
81.30 

363.53 
133.44 

23.57 
10.02 

Hay  digested 

Per  cent,  digested, 

430.03 
60.57 

13.65 
33.50 

32.38 
53.53 

140.36 
63.32 

230.09 
63.29 

13.55 
57.49 

Sheep  VI. 


800  grams  English  bay  fed 

Minus  317.10  grams  feces  excreted. 

710.00 
301.56 

40.75 
27.38 

60.49 

29.58 

221.66 
91.64 

363.53 
142.35 

23.57 
10.61 

Hay  digested, 

Per  cent,  digested, 

408.44 
57.53 

13.37 
32.81 

30.91 
51.10 

130.02 
58.66 

221.18 
60.84 

12.96 
54.99 

Average  per  cent,  digested,     . 

59.05 

33.16 

52.32 

60.99 

62.07 

56.24 

DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH   SHEEP. 


273 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  —  Continued. 

Series  XIX.,  English  Hay,  Potato  Starch  and  Gluten  Meal  (Diamond),  — 
Gluten  Meal  (Diamond),  Period  10. 

Sheep  III. 


Item. 

>> 

Q 

< 

a 
'S 
o 

M 
PL, 

o  -g 

300  grams  English  hay  fed,    .... 

125  grams  potato  starch  fed, 

100  grams  gluten  meal  (Diamond)  fed. 

270.81 
113.23 
94.40 

15.60 

.81 

20.50 
42.47 

86.85 
2.04 

141.55 
113.23 
47.37 

6.31 
1.71 

Amount  consumed 

Minus  132.41  grams  feces  excreted. 

478.44 
127.01 

16.41 
10.88 

62.97 
16.70 

88.89 
35.89 

302.15 

58.27 

8.02 
5.27 

Amount  digested, 

Minus  hay  and  starch  (100  per  cent. )  digested. 

351.43 
273.01 

5.53 
4.37 

46.27 
10.66 

53.00 
53.85 

243.88 
200.99 

2.75 
2.96 

Gluten  meal  (Diamond)  digested. 

Per  cent,  ration  digested 

78.42 
73.45 

1.16 
33.70 

35.61 
73.48 

59.62 

42.89 
80.71 

34.29 

Per  cent,  gluten  meal  (Diamond)  digested,  . 

83.07 

143.20 

83.85 

- 

90.54 

- 

Sheep  IV. 


Amount  consumed  as  above. 
Minus  147.44  grams  feces  excreted. 

478.44 
141.26 

16.41 
14.24 

62.97 
18.25 

88.89 
39.64 

302.15 
63.73 

8.02 
5.40 

Amount  digested, 

Minus  hay  and  starch  (100  per  cent.)  digested. 

337.18 
273.01 

2.17 
4.37 

44.72 
10.66 

49.25 
53.85 

238.42 
200.99 

2.62 
2.75 

Gluten  meal  (Diamond)  digested. 

Per  cent,  ration  digested,       .... 

64.17 
70.47 

13.22 

34.06 
71.02 

55.41 

37.43 
78.91 

32.67 

Per  cent,  gluten  meal  (Diamond)  digested,  . 

68.00 

- 

80.00 

- 

79.00 

- 

Average  per  cent,  ration  digested,  . 

71.96 

23.46 

72.25 

57.52 

79.81 

33.48 

Average  per  cent,  gluten  meal  (Diamond) 
digested. 

75.54 

71.60 

81.93 

- 

84.77 

- 

274       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  —  Continued. 

Series  XIX.,  English  Hay,  Potato  Starch  and  Gluten  Meal  (Diamond),  — 
Gluten  Meal  (Diamond),  Period  11. 

Sheep  IV. 


Item. 

>> 
Q 

< 

as 

St? 

400  grams  English  hay  fed,    .... 

125  grams  potato  starch  fed, 

125  grams  gluten  meal  (Diamond)  fed, 

369.40 
112.80 
117.25 

20.91 
1.34 

25.93 
52.52 

118.47 
2.16 

195.37 
112.80 
58.86 

8.72 
2.37 

Amount  consumed, 

Minus  174.32  grams  feces  excreted. 

599.45 
166.84 

22.25 
14.70 

78.45 
19.60 

120.63 
47.37 

367.03 
79.30 

11.09 
5.87 

Amount  digested 

Minus  hay  and  starch  (100  per  cent.)  digested, 

432.61 
330.75 

7.55 
5.85 

58.85 
13.48 

73.26 
73.45 

287.73 
233.93 

5.22 
4.10 

Gluten  meal  (Diamond)  digested, 

Per  cent,  ration  digested 

101.86 
72.17 

1.70 
33.93 

45.37 
75.02 

60.73 

53.80 
78.39 

1.12 
47.07 

Per  cent,  gluten  meal  (Diamond)  digested,  . 

86.90 

127.00 

86.40 

- 

91.40 

47.30 

Series  XIX.,  Distillers'  Grains  (Corn),  Period  12. 
Sheep  IV. 


400  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 

125  grams  gluten  meal  fed,     . 

125  grams  potato  starch  fed, 

200  grams  distillers*  grains  fed, 

Amount  consumed. 

Minus  240.66  grams  feces  excreted. 

Amount  digested,  .... 

Minus  hay,  potato  starch  and  gluten  meal 
digested. 

Distillers'  grains  digested,      .... 

Per  cent,  digested, 


359.00 
117.51 
113.49 
187.72 


777.72 
229.42 


548.30 
424.80 


123.50 
65.79 


21.72 
1.57 


3.44 


26.73 
20.35 


6.38 
7.92 


26.42 
'52.87 


55.28 


134.57 
31.20 


103.37 
59.44 


43.93 

79.47 


115.10 
2.36 


23.69 


141.15 
65.64 


75.51 
71.65 


3.86 
16.29 


184.99 
58.44 

113.49 
86.73 


443.65 
104.06 


339.59 
278.40 


61.19 
70.55 


10.77 
2.27 


18.58 


31.62 
8.17 


23.45 
6.13 


17.32 
93.22 


DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH   SHEEP. 


275 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficient- — Continued. 

Series  XIX.,  Corn  Bran,  Period  13. 
Sheep  I. 


Item. 

u 

Q 

< 

'53 
1 

St? 

2 

1 

400  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
350  grams  corn  bran  fed, 

363.48 
316.47 

22.28 
2.72 

25.52 
16:52 

119.33 

45.89 

188.21 
247.32 

8.14 
4.02 

Amount  consumed, 

Minus  191.02  grams  feces  excreted. 

679.95 
180.42 

25.00 
14.38 

42.04 
20.82 

165.22 
45.39 

435.63 
93.77 

12.16 
6.05 

Amount  digested 

Minus  hay  digested. 

499.53 
214.45 

10.62 
4.90 

21.22 
13.02 

119.83 
73.98 

341.76 
118.57 

6.10 
3.09 

Corn  bran  digested, 
Per  cent,  digested. 

285.08 
90.08 

5.72 
210.29 

8.20 
49.64 

45.85 
99.91 

223.19 
90.24 

3.01 

74.88 

Sheep  II. 


Amount  consumed  aa  above. 
Minus  234.41  grams  feces  excreted 
Amount  digested,  . 
Minus  hay  digested, 
Corn  bran  digested. 
Per  cent,  digested, 

Average  per  cent,  digested. 


679.95 
221.52 


458.43 
214.45 


243.98 
77.09 


83.59 


25.00 

16.59 


8.41 
4.90 


3.51 
129.04 


169.67 


42.04 
24.72 


17.32 
13.02 


4.30 
26.03 


37.84 


165.22 
60.54 


104.68 
73.98 


30.70 
66.90 


83.41 


435.53 
112.43 


323.10 
118.57 


204.53 
82.70 


86.47 


12.16 

7.24 


4.92 
3.09 


1.83 
45.52 


60.20 


Series  XIX.,  Gluten  Feed,  Period  14. 
Sheep  V. 


650  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
150  grams  gluten  feed  fed. 

584.68 
135.78 

35.14 
1.29 

48.47 
37.92 

184.47 
12.65 

300.93 
77.21 

15.67 
6.71 

Amount  consumed. 

Minus  237.30  grams  feces  excreted. 

720.46 
223.20 

36.43 
20.47 

86.39 
29.04 

197.12 
58.17 

378.14 
105.94 

22.38 
9.58 

Amount  digested,  .... 
Minus  hay  digested, 

497.26 
344.96 

15.96 
11.60 

57.35 
25.20 

138.95 
112.53 

272.20 
186.58 

12.80 

8.78 

Gluten  feed  digested,     . 
Per  cent,  digested. 

152.30 
112.09 

4.36 
337.98 

32.15 

84.78 

26.42 

208.85 

85.62 
110.89 

4.02 
59.91 

276       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  —  Continued. 

Series  XIX.,  Gluten  Feed,  Period  14  —  Concluded. 

Sheep  VI. 


Item. 

'3 
a. 

E 

o 

M  1- 

o  -g 

's 
fe 

Amount  consumed  as  above. 
Minus  262.21  grams  feces  excreted, 

720.46 
247.05 

36.43 
21.49 

86.39 
27.18 

197.12 
69.87 

378.14 
118.50 

22.38 
10.01 

Amount  digested 

Minus  hay  digested, 

473.41 
344.96 

14.94 
11.60 

59.21 
25.20 

127.25 
112.53 

259.64 
186.58 

12.37 

8.78 

Gluten  feed  digested, 

Per  cent,  digested, 

128.45 
94.54 

3.34 
258.91 

34.01 
89.69 

14.72 
116.36 

73.06 
94.63 

3.59 
53.50 

Average  per  cent,  digested, 

103.32 

298.45 

87.24 

162.61 

102.76 

56.71 

Serie.s  XIX.,  English  Hay  and  Gluten  Feed,  —  Gluten  Feed,  Period  15. 

Sheep  V. 


650  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 

125  grams  gluten  feed  fed. 

Amount  consumed. 

Minus  246.94  grams  feces  excreted. 

Amount  digested,  .         .         .         . 

Minus  hay  digested. 

Gluten  feed  digested,     . 

Per  cent,  ration  digested, 

Per  cent,  gluten  feed  digested. 


587.73 
113.59 


701.32 
233.51 


467.81 
346.76 


121.05 
66.70 


106.57 


33.62 
2.61 


36.23 

20.88 


15.35 
11.09 


4.26 
42.45 


163.22 


44.26 
29.35 


73.61 
26.34 


47.27 
23.02 


24.25 
64.22 


82.62 


185.02 
9.28 


194.30 
65.36 


128.94 
112.86 


16.08 
66.36 


173.28 


311.90 
66.97 


378.87 
112.55 


266.32 
193.38 


72.94 
70.29 


108.91 


12.93 
5.38 


18.31 

8.38 


9.93 
7.24 


2.69 
54.23 


50.00 


Sheep  VI. 

Amount  consumed  as  above. 
Minus  280.06  grams  feces  excreted. 

701.32 
264.94 

36.23 
21.75 

73.61 
29.67 

194.30 
77.04 

378.87 
127.00 

18.31 
9.48 

Amount  digested,  .... 
Minus  hay  digested. 

436.38 
346.76 

14.48 
11.09 

43.94 
23.02 

117.26 
112.86 

251.87 
193.38 

8.83 
'  7.24 

Gluten  feed  digested,     . 
Per  cent,  ration  digested. 

89.62 
62.22 

3.39 
39.97 

20.92 
59.69 

4.40 
60.35 

58.49 
66.48 

1.59 
48.23 

Per  cent,  gluten  feed  digested, 

78.90 

129.89 

71.28 

47.41 

87.34 

29.55 

Average  per  cent,  ration  digested. 

64.46 

41.21 

61.96 

63.36 

68.39 

51.23 

Average  per  cent,  gluten  feed  diges 

ted,  . 

92.74 

146.56 

76.95 

110.35 

98.13 

39.78 

DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH   SHEEP. 


277 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients 

Series  XX.,  English  Hay,  Period  1. 
Sheep  I. 


Continued. 


Item. 

u 

% 

>> 

u 

Q 

j3 
< 

a 
'S 

o 

u 

o 

s 

a) 

a  o 
o  -g 

fa 

800  grams  English  hay  fed 

Minus  281.27  grams  feces  excreted, 

737.36 
260.32 

44.32 
26.73 

53.24 
26.16 

239.13 
70.75 

381.94 
126.89 

18.73 
9.79 

English  hay  digested, 

Per  cent,  digested, 

477.04 
64.70 

17.59 
39.69 

27.08 
50.86 

168.38 
70.41 

255.05 
66.78 

8.94 
48.67 

Sheep  II. 


800  grams  EngUsh  hay  fed,    .... 
Minus  291.37  grams  feces  excreted, 

737.36 
269.63 

44.32 
27.93 

53.24 
26.42 

239.13 
75.74 

381.94 
129.62 

18.73 
9.92 

English  hay  digested 

Per  cent,  digested, 

467.73 
63.43 

16.39 
36.98 

26.82 
50.38 

163.39 
68.33 

252.32 
66.06 

8.81 
47.96 

Average  per  cent,  digested. 

64.07 

38.34 

50.62 

69.62 

66.42 

48.32 

Series  XX.,  Pumpkins  (Entire),  Period  2. 
Sheep  I. 


500  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
2,000  grams  pumpkins  fed,     . 

449.50 
268.40 

27.96 
20.94 

30.66 
38.03 

145.10 
34.92 

231.62 
145.63 

14.16 

28.88 

Amount  consumed. 

Minus  223.14  grams  feces  excreted. 

717.90 
211.14 

48.90 
23.42 

68.69 
27.03 

180.02 
57.13 

377.25 
93.09 

43.04 
10.47 

Amount  digested,  .... 
Minus  hay  digested, 

506.76 
287.68 

25.48 
10.62 

41.66 
15.84 

122.89 
100.12 

284.16 
152.87 

32.57 
6.79 

Pumpkins  digested. 
Per  cent,  digested, 

219.08 
81.62 

14.86 
70.96 

25.82 
67.89 

22.77 
65.20 

131.29 
90.84 

25.78 
89.27 

Sheep  II. 


Amount  consumed  as  above, 
Minus  203.70  grams  feces  excreted, 

717.90 
193.41 

48.90 
25.09 

68.69 
23.87 

180.02 
50.71 

377.25 
83.99 

43.04 
9.75 

Amount  digested 

Minus  hay  digested 

524.49 

287.68 

23.81 
10.62 

44.82 
15.84 

129.31 
100.12 

293.26 

152.87 

33.29 
6.79 

Pumpkins  digested 

Per  cent,  digested, 

236.81 
88.23 

13.19 
62.99 

28.98 
76.20 

29.19 
83.59 

140.39 
96.40 

26.50 
91.76 

Average  per  cent,  digested. 

84.93 

66.98 

72.05 

74.39 

93.62 

90.52 





278        MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 


Table  V.  ■ —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  —  Coyitinued. 

Series  XX.,  Pumpkins  (Entire),  Period  3. 
Sheep  I. 


Item. 

u 

Is 

Q 

< 

'53 

1 

o 

fe 

550  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
150  grams  gluten  feed  fed,      . 
1,200  grams  pxunpkins  fed,     . 

495.00 
136.65 
191.04 

30.15 
2.51 

13.87 

36.23 
34.91 
29.94 

159.09 
11.30 
27.49 

256.96 

81.58 
98.90 

12.57 

6.35 

20.84 

Amount  consumed, 

Minus  248.90  grams  feces  excreted. 

822.69 
236.31 

46.53 
25.62 

101.08 
30.51 

197.88 
62.06 

437.44 
108.34 

39.76 
9.78 

Amount  digested,  .... 
Minus  hay  and  gluten  feed  digested. 

586.38 
435.84 

20.91 
11.43 

70.57 
45.53 

135.82 
122.68 

329.10 
243.75 

29.98 
11.62 

Pumpkins  digested, 
Per  cent,  digested. 

150.54 
78.80 

9.48 
68.35 

25.04 
83.63 

13.14 

47.80 

85.35 
86.30 

18.36 
88.10 

Sheep  II. 


Amount  consumed  as  above, 
Mintis  255.64  grams  feces  excreted, 

81,2.69 
242.78 

46.53 
28.19 

101.08 
30.83 

197.88 
62.49 

437.44 
110.78 

39.76 
10.49 

Amount  digested 

Minus  hay  and  gluten  feed  digested,    . 

579.91 
435.84 

18.34 
11.43 

70.25 
45.63 

135.39 
122.68 

326.66 
243.75 

29.27 
11.62 

Pumpkins  digested 

Per  cent,  digested, 

144.07 
75.41 

6.91 
49.82 

24.72 
82.57 

12.71 
46.23 

82.91 
83.83 

17.65 
84.69 

Average  per  cent,  digested. 

77.11 

59.09 

83.10 

47.02 

85.07 

86.40 

Series  XX.,  Pumpkins  (Entire),  Period  4. 
Sheep  I. 


412  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
112  grams  gluten  feed  fed,     . 
2,000  grams  pumpkins  fed,    . 

373.07 
102.73 
234.40 

22.72 
2.09 
10.48 

27.42 
26.56 
34.81 

120.99 

8.49 

36.87 

190.86 
60.82 
113.24 

11.08 
4.77 
30.00 

Amount  consumed. 

Minus  216.87  grams  feces  excreted. 

710.20 
201.77 

44.29 
20.62 

88.79 
28.20 

166.35 
58.93 

364.92 
88.79 

45.85 
8.23 

Amount  digested 

Minus  hay  and  gluten  feed  digested. 

505.43 
328.30 

23.67 
8.68 

60.59 
34.55 

107.42 
93.23 

276.13 
181.21 

37.62 
9.35 

Pumpkins  digested. 
Per  cent,  digested, 

177.13 
75.57 

14.99 
76.95 

26.04 
74.81 

14.19 
38.49 

94.92 
83.82 

28.27 
94.23 

DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH   SHEEP. 


279 


Table  V.  ■ —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  —  Continued. 

Series  XX.,  English  Hay  and  Gluten  Feed,  —  Gluten  Feed,  Period  5. 

Sheep  I. 


Item. 

<0 

p 

ji 
< 

0 

o 

a  o 

550  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
150  grams  gluten  feed  fed,      . 

497.86 
136.71 

29.92 
2.67 

43.21 
36.54 

159.22 
11.39 

251.62 
79.82 

13.89 
6.29 

Amount  consumed,        .        .        .  t 
Minus  197.54  grams  feces  excreted, 

634.57 
188.22 

32.59 
19.20 

79.75 
26.76 

170.61 
44.16 

331.44 
90.14 

20.18 
7.96 

Amount  digested 

Minus  hay  digested. 

446.35 
318.63 

13.39 
11.87 

52.99 
22.04 

126.45 
109.86 

241.30 
166.07 

12.22 
6.71 

Gluten  feed  digested,     . 
Per  cent,  ration  digested. 

127.72 
70.34 

2.02 
41.09 

30.95 
66.45 

16.59 
74.12 

75.23 
72.80 

5.51 
60.56 

Per  cent,  gluten  feed  digested, 

93.42 

75.66 

84.70 

145.65 

94.25 

87.60 

Sheep  II. 


Amount  consumed  as  above. 
Minus  221.18  grams  feces  excreted. 

634.57 
211.36 

32.59      79.75 
23.19       30.77 

170.61 
51.87 

331.44 
97.12 

20.18 
8.41 

Amount  digested 

Minus  hay  digested, 

423.21 
318.63 

9.40 
11.37 

48.98 
22.04 

118.74 
109.86 

234.32 
166.07 

11.77 
6.71 

Gluten  feed  digested,     . 
Per  cent,  ration  digested, 

104.58 
66.69 

28.84 

26.94 
61.42 

8.88 
69.60 

68.25 
70.70 

5.06 
58.33 

Per  cent,  gluten  feed  digested. 

76.50 

- 

73.73 

77.96 

85.50 

80.45 

Average  per  cent,  ration  digested, 

68.52 

34.97 

63.94 

71.86 

71.75 

59.45 

Average  per  cent,  gluten  feed  diges 

ted,  . 

84.96 

75.66' 

79.22 

111.81 

89.88 

84.03 

Series  XX.,  English  Hay,  Period  6. 
Sheep  IV. 


800  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 

. 

717.84 

44.22 

53.41 

230.28 

272.99 

16.94 

Minus  300.50  grams  feces  excreted. 

288.33 

25.63 

27.59 

84.97 

139.85 

10.29 

Amount  digested 

429.51 

18.59 

25.82 

145.31 

233.14 

6.65 

Per  cent,  digested, 

60.08 

42.04 

48.34 

63.10 

62.51 

39.26 

1  One 

sheep  on 

Jy. 

280       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 


Table  V.  —  Computation 
Series  XX 


OF  Digestion  Coefficients 
,  Soy  Bean  Hay,  Period  7. 
Sheep  V. 


Continued. 


Item. 


400  grams  English  hay  fed, 

Minus  29.03  grams  waste, 

Amount  consumed, 

400  grams  soy  bean  hay  fed. 

Minus  55.1  grams  waste. 

Amount  soy  bean  hay  fed, 

Amount  consumed, 

Minus  284.68  grams  feces  excreted 

Amount  digested,  . 

Minus  hay  digested. 

Amount  soy  bean  hay  digested. 

Per  cent,  digested. 


367.68 
27.24 


340.44 


353.08 
51.00 


302.08 


642.52 
270.13 


372.39 
214.48 


157.91 
52.27 


22.39 
1.64 


20.75 


23.41 
2.77 


20.64 


41.39 
30.69 


10.70 
8.30 


2.40 
11.63 


26.95 

1.74 

25.21 


56.00 
3.76 


52.24 


77.45 
27.80 


49.65 
12.61 


37.04 
70.90 


120.19 
9.57 


110.62 


123.15 
22.93 


210.84 

87.25 


123.59 
74.12 


49.47 
49.36 


189.51 
13.86 


175.65 


143.21 
21.13 


122.08 


297.73 
116.69 


181.04 
114.17 


66.87 
54.78 


8.64 
.43 


8.21 


7.31 
.41 


15.11 
7.70 


7.41 
3.69 


3.72 
53.91 


Sheei)  VI. 


400  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
400  grams  soy  bean  hay  fed. 
Amount  consumed. 
Minus  287.90  grams  feces  excreted. 

Amount  digested 

Minus  hay  digested. 
Soy  bean  hay  digested. 
Per  cent,  digested, 

Average  per  cent,  digested. 


367.68 
353.08 


720.76 
273.65 


447.11 
231.64 


215.47 
61.03 


56.65 


22.39 
23.41 


45.80 
29.99 


15.81 
8.96 


6.85 

29.26 


20.45       74. 


26.95 
56.00 


82.95 
25.31 


57.64 
13.48 


44.16 

78.86 


120.19 
123.15 


243.34 
94.16 


149.18 
80.53 


68.65 
55.75 


52.56 


189.51 
143.21 


332.72 
116.86 


215.86 
123.18 


92.68 
64.72 


59.75 


8.64 
7.31 


15.95 
7.33 


8.62 
3.89 


4.73 
64.71 


59.31 


Series  XX.,  Carrots,  Period  8. 
Sheep  IV. 


500  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
1^500  grams  carrots  fed. 
Amount  consumed. 
Minus  228.61  grams  feces  excreted. 

Amount  digested 

Minus  hay  digested. 

Carrots  digested,    .        .        .        . 

Per  cent,  digested, 


449.85 
196.95 


646.80 
216.81 


429.99 
283.41 


146.58 
74.42 


30.23 
20.31 


50.54 
28.25 


22.29 
12.09 


10.20 
50.22 


35.72 

22.12 
57.84 
22.79 


35.05 
17.86 


17.19 
77.71 


146.34 
17.39 


163.73 
58.69 


105.04 
98.05 


6.99 
40.19 


225.95 
135.12 


361.07 
98.39 


262.68 
146.87 


115.81 
85.71 


11.61 
2.01 


13.62 


4.93 
5.22 


DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS    WITH    SHEEP. 


281 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients 
Series  XX.,  Carrots,  Period  8  —  Concluded. 
Sheep  V. 


Continued. 


Item. 

Q 

JS 

< 

c 
"S 
o 

II 

C3 

Amount  consumed  as  above, 
Minus  200.63  grams  feces  excreted, 

646.80 
190.44 

50.54 
25.27 

57.84 
21.10 

163.73 
47.95 

361.07 

88.24 

13.62 

7.88 

Amount  digested, 

Minus  hay  digested 

456.36 

283.41 

25.27 
12.09 

36.74 
17.86 

115.78 
98.05 

272.83 
146.87 

6.74 
5.22 

Carrots  digested 

Per  cent,  digested, 

172.95 
87.81 

13.18 
64.89 

18.88 
85.35 

17.73 
101.96 

125.96 
93.22 

.52 

25.87 

Sheep  VI. 


Amount  consumed  as  above. 
Minus  208.06  grams  feces  excreted, 

646.80 
198.49 

50.54 
29.56 

57.84 
20.84 

163.73 
51.41 

361.07 

88.48 

13.62 
8.20 

Amount  digested 

Minus  hay  digested 

448.31 
283.41 

20.98 
12.09 

37.00 
17.86 

112.32 
98.0  ; 

272.59 
146.87 

5.42 
5.22 

Carrots  digested, 

Per  cent,  digested, 

164.90 
83.73 

8.89 
43.77 

19.14 
86.53 

14.27 
82.06 

125.72 
93.04 

.20 
9.95 

Average  per  cent,  digested,     . 

81.99 

52.96 

83.20 

74.74 

90.66 

17.91 > 

Series  XX.,  Carrots,  Period  9. 
Sheep  IV. 


550  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
150  grams  gluten  feed  fed, 
1,000  grams  carrots  fed. 

497.04 
137.03 
114.00 

30.97 
3.04 
11.18 

37.78 
36.41 
12.67 

151.30 
10.63 
9.69 

263.72 
80.36 
79.22 

13.27 
6.59 
1.24 

Amount  consumed. 

Minus  250.91  grams  feces  excreted, 

748.07 
240.07 

45.19 
27.03 

86.86 
28.28 

171.62 
59.30 

423.30 
116.31 

21.10 
9.15 

Amount  digested 

Minus  hay  and  gluten  feed  digested. 

508.00 
393.12 

18.16 
9.86 

58.58 
47.48 

112.32 
103.64 

306.99 
223.65 

11.95 
9.^ 

Carrots  digested 

Per  cent,  digested, 

114.88 
100.70 

8.30 

74.24 

11.10 
87.61 

8.68 
89.68 

83.34 
105.20 

2.02 
162.90 

Two  sheep  only. 


282       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients 
Series  XX.,  Carrots,  Period  9  —  Concluded. 
Sheep  V. 


Continued. 


Item. 

1 

>> 

Q 

< 

a 

2 

o 

1   . 
Co 

II 

2 

1 

Amount  consumed  as  above. 
Minus  233.76  grams  feces  excreted, 

748.07 
222.94 

45.19 
25.06 

86.86 
25.95 

171.62 
53.57 

423.30 
109.73 

21.10 
8.63 

Amount  digested, 

Minus  hay  and  gluten  feed  digested,    . 

525.13 
393.12 

20.13 
9.86 

60.91 
47.48 

118.05 
103.64 

313.57 
223.65 

12.47 
9.93 

Carrots  digested 

Per  cent,  digested,          .        .        .     i    . 

132.01 
115.80 

10.27 
91.86 

13.43 
106.00 

14.41 
143.71 

89.92 
113.51 

2.54 
204.84 

Sheep  VI. 


Amount  consumed  as  above. 

748.07 

45.19 

86.86 

171.62 

423.30 

21.10 

Minus  210.84  grams  feces  excreted, 

200.99 

24.58 

23.17 

48.84 

96.06 

8.34 

Amount  digested, 

547.08 

20.61 

63.69 

122.78 

327.24 

12.76 

Minus  hay  and  gluten  feed  digested,    . 

393.12 

9.86 

47.48 

103.64 

223.65 

9.93 

Carrots  digested 

153.96 

10.75 

16.21 

19.14 

103.59 

2.83 

Per  cent,  digested, 

135.05 

96.15 

127.94 

197.52 

130.76 

228.23 

Average  per  cent,  digested, 

113.85 

87.42 

107.18 

145.27 

116.49 

198.66 

Series  XX.,  English  Hay,  Period  10. 
Sheep  VII. 


600  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
Minus  244.84  grams  feces  excreted. 

Amount  digested 

Per  cent,  digested, 


546.00 
235.85 


310.15 
56.80 


35.65 
20.42 


15.23 

42.72 


44.50 
21.25 


23.25 
52.25 


174.83 
70.68 


104.15 
59.57 


277.37 
115.74 


161.63 
58.27 


13.65 
7.76 


5.89 
43.15 


Sheep  VIII 

• 

600  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
Minus  228.90  grams  feces  excreted. 

. 

546.00 
220.06 

35.65 
19.89 

44.50 
21.04 

174.83 
65.67 

277.37 
105.52 

13.65 
7.94 

Amount  digested,  .... 
Per  cent,  digested,          ... 

325.94 
59.70 

15.76 
44.21 

23.46 
52.72 

109.16 
62.44 

171.85 
61.96 

5.71 
41.83 

Average  per  cent,  digested,     . 

58.25 

43.47 

52.49 

61.01 

60.12 

42.49 

DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH    SHEEP. 


283 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  • —  Continued. 

Series  XX.,  New  Bedford  Pig  Meal,  Period  11. 

Sheep  IV. 


Item. 

Q 

< 

a 

S 

o 

It 

as 

1 

550  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 

150  grams  gluten  feed  fed, 

200  grams  New  Bedford  pig  meal  fed. 

455.35 
137.18 
182.40 

30.96 

2.96 

35.84 

39.02 
34.94 
43.03 

146.35 
11.48 
16.69 

227.64 
81.46 
80.80 

11.38 
6.34 
6.04 

Amount  consumed. 

Minus  295.87  grams  feces  excreted. 

774.93 
281.73 

69.76 
42.71 

116.99 

40.68 

174.52 
70.43 

389.90 
121.09 

23.76 
6.82 

Amount  digested 

Minus  hay  and  gluten  feed  digested, 

493.20 
367.37 

27.05 
9.84 

76.31 
47.33 

104.09 
101.01 

268.81 
200.92 

16.94 
8.86 

New  Bedford  pig  meal  digested,   . 
Per  cent,  digested. 

125.83 
68.99 

17.21 
48.02 

28.98 
67.35 

3.08 
18.45 

67.89 
84.02 

8.08 
133.77 

Sheep  VI. 


Amount  consumed  as  above. 
Minus  295.20  grams  feces  excreted, 

774.93 
281.18 

69.76 
45.24 

116.99 
38.94 

174.52 
69.14 

389.90 
121.59 

23.76 

6.27 

Amount  digested, 

Minvis  hay  and  gluten  feed  digested,    . 

493.75 
367.37 

24.52 
9.84 

78.05 
47.33 

105.38 
101.01 

268.31 
200.92 

17.49 
8.86 

New  Bedford  pig  meal  digested,  . 

Per  cent,  digested, 

126.38 
69.29 

14.68 
40.96 

30.72 
71.39 

4.37 

26.18 

67.39 
83.40 

8.63 
142.88 

Average  per  cent,  digested,     . 

69.14 

44.49 

69.37 

22.32 

83.71 

138.33 

Series  XX.,  English  Hat  and  Wheat  Gluten  Flour,  Period  12.  i 
Sheep  VII. 


600  grams  English  hay  fed,    .... 

554.70 

37.00 

39.77 

173.73 

289.00 

15.20 

40  grams  wheat  gluten  fed,    .... 

36.66 

.32 

33.88 

.04 

2.28 

.14 

Amount  consumed 

591.36 

37.32 

73,65 

173.77 

291.28 

15.34 

Jlinus  238.80  grams  feces  excreted. 

227.70 

19.17 

22.72 

66.08 

111.53 

8.20 

Amount  digested 

363.66 

18.15 

50.93 

107.69 

179.75 

7.l"4 

Minus  wheat  gluten  (assumed  to  be  all  di- 
gested). 

36.66 

.32 

33.88 

.04 

2.28 

.14 

Hay  digested, 

327.00 

17.83 

17,05 

107.65 

177.47 

7.00 

Per  cent,  digested, 

58.95 

48.19 

42.87 

61.96 

61.44 

46.05 

'  To  note  effect  of  wheat  gluten  flour. 


284       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  —  Continued. 

Series  XX.,  English  Hay  and  Wheat  Gluten  Flour,  Period  12  —  Concluded. 

Sheep  VIII. 


Item. 

C 
o 

Q 

< 

a 
2 

Oh 

s 

o 

It 

2: 

Amount  consumed  as  above, 
Minus  235.59  grams  feces  excreted, 

591.36 
224.59 

37.32 
19.81 

73.65 
23.96 

173.77 
62.80 

291.38 
110.11 

15.34 
7.91 

Amount  digested, 

Minus  wheat  gluten  (assumed  to  be  all  di- 
gested). 

366.77 
36.66 

17.51 
.32 

49.69 
33.88 

110.97 
.04 

181.17 
2.28 

7.43 
.14 

Hay  digested 

Per  cent,  digested, 

330.11 
59.51 

17.19 
46.46 

15.81 
39.75 

110.93 
63.85 

178.89 
61.90 

7.29 
47.96 

Average  per  cent,  digested,     . 

59.23 

47.33 

41.31 

62.91 

61.99 

47.01 

Series  XX.,  Vegetable  Ivory  Meal,  Period  13. 
Sheep  IV. 


500  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
150  grams  gluten  feed  fed,      . 
200  grams  vegetable  ivory  meal  fed. 

460.10 
137.70 
182.50 

29.45 
2.96 
2.17 

33.59 

35.58 

8.61 

148.24 
11.31 
15.09 

237.46 
81.72 
155.22 

11.36 
6.13 
1.41 

Amount  consumed, 

Miniis  263.03  grams  feces  excreted. 

780.30 
248.69 

34.58 
23.80 

77.78 
32.60 

174.64 
61.05 

474.40 
121.64 

18.90 
9.60 

Amount  digested 

Minus  hay  and  gluten  feed  digested. 

531.61 
370.64 

10.78 
9.40 

45.18 
44.27 

113.59 
102.11 

352.76 
207.47 

9.30 
8.75 

Vegetable  ivory  meal  digested. 
Per  cent,  digested. 

160.97 
.88.20 

1.38 
63.59 

.91 
10.57 

11.48 
76.08 

145.28 
93.60 

.55 
39.01 

Sheep  V. 


Amount  consumed  as  above, 

780.30 

34.58 

77.78 

174.64 

474.40 

18.90 

Minus  242.74  grams  feces  excreted. 

229.05 

23.14 

30.53 

54.35 

111.73 

9.30 

Amount  digested, 

551.25 

11.44 

47.25 

120.29 

362.67 

9.60 

Minus  hay  and  gluten  feed  digested,    . 

370.64 

9.40 

44.27 

102.11 

207:47 

8.75 

Vegetable  ivory  meal  digested. 

180.61 

2.04 

2.98 

18.18 

155.20 

.85 

Per  cent,  digested, 

98.96 

94.01 

34.61 

120.48 

99.99 

60.28 

DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH    SHEEP. 


285 


Table  V.  —  CoiMputation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  —  Continued. 

Series  XX.,  Vegetable  Ivory  Meal,  Period  13  —  Concluded. 
Sheep  VI. 


Item. 

Is 
Q 

< 

c 
2 

PL, 

C  o 

1 

Amount  consumed  as  above. 
Minus  237.89  grams  feces  excreted. 

780.30 
224.04 

34.58 
24.22 

77.78 
28.92 

174.64 
53.03 

474.40 
108.17 

18.90 
9.70 

Amount  digested 

Minus  hay  and  gluten  feed  digested,    . 

556.26 
370.64 

10.36 
9.40 

48.86 
44.27 

121.61 
102.11 

366.23 
207.47 

9.20 

8.75 

Vegetable  ivory  meal  digested, 

Per  cent,  digested, 

185.62 
101.71 

.96 
44.24 

3.59 
41.70 

19.50 
129.22 

158.76 
102.28 

.45 
31.91 

Average  per  cent,  digested. 

96.29 

67.28 

28.96 

108.59 

98.62 

43.73 

Series  XX.,  English  Hay  .\nd  Gluten  Feed,  —  Gluten  Feed,  Period  14. 

Sheep  IV. 


550  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
150  grams  gluten  feed  fed. 

509.41 
138.14 

31.94 
2.94 

35.40 
37.45 

165.25 
11.81 

263.63 
79.74 

13.19 
6.20 

.\mount  consumed. 

Minus  271  grams  feces  excreted. 

647.55 
257.02 

34.88 
25.42 

72.85 
26.63 

177.06 
70.22 

343.37 
125.24 

19.39 
9.51 

Amount  digested,  . 
Minus  hay  digested. 

390.53 
320.93 

9.46 
12.78 

46.22 
17.70 

106.84 
110.72 

218.13 
171.36 

9.88 
5.94 

Gluten  feed  digested,     . 
Per  cent,  ration  digested. 

69.60 
60.31 

27.12 

28.52 
63.45 

60.34 

46.77 
63.53 

3.94 
50.95 

Per  cent,  gluten  feed  digested. 

50.38 

- 

76.15 

- 

58.65 

63.55 

Sheep  V. 


Amount  consumed  as  above, 
!Minus  250.96  grams  feces  excreted. 

647.55 
238.11 

34.88 
24.76 

72.85 
26.22 

177.06 
60.22 

343.37 
116.58 

19.39 
10.33 

Amount  digested, 

Minus  hay  digested 

409.44 
320.93 

10.12 
12.78 

46.63 
17.70 

116.84 
110.72 

226.79 
171.36 

9.06 
5.94 

Gluten  feed  digested 

Per  cent,  ration  digested,       .... 

88.51 
63.23 

29.01 

28.93 
64.01 

6.12 
65.99 

55.43 
66.05 

3.12 
46.73 

Per  cent,  gluten  feed  digested. 

64.07 

- 

77.25 

51.82 

69.51 

50.32 

286       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  —  Continued. 

Series  XX.,  English  Hay  and  Gluten  Feed,  —  Gluten  Feed,  —  Period  14  - 

Concluded. 

Sheep  VI. 


Item. 

la 

m 

<: 

n 

s 

as 

1 

Amount  consumed  as  above, 
Minus  246.79  grams  feces  excreted, 

647.55 
234.80 

34.88 
23.74 

72.85 
25.71 

177.06 
60.34 

343.37 
115.69 

19.39 
9.32 

Amount  digested,  .... 
Minus  hay  digested. 

412.75 
320.93 

11.14 
12.78 

47.14 
17.70 

116.72 
110.72 

227.68 
171.36 

10.07 
5.94 

Gluten  feed  digested,     . 
Per  cent,  ration  digested. 

91.82 
63.74 

31.94 

29.44 
64.71 

6.00 
65.92 

56.32 
66.31 

4.13 
51.93 

Per  cent,  gluten  feed  digested. 

66.47 

78.61 

50.80 

70.63 

66.01 

Average  per  cent,  ration  digested. 

62.43 

29.36 

64.06 

64.08 

65.30 

49.87 

Average  per  cent,  gluten  feed  diges 

ted,  . 

60.31 

- 

77.34 

51.311 

66.26 

60.16 

Series  XXI.,  English  Hay  and  Gluten  Feed,  —  Gluten  Feed,  Period  1. 

Sheep  IV. 


550  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
150  grams  gluten  feed  fed,     . 

491.43 
135.48 

33.96 
4.55 

37.10 
38.33 

157.55 
10.07 

248.91 
80.08 

13.91 
2.45 

Amount  consumed, 

Minus  236.19  grams  feces  excreted 

626.91 
219.61 

38.51 
26.27 

75.43 
23.85 

167.62 
57.80 

328.99 
102.86 

16.36 
8.83 

Amount  digested,  . 
Minus  hay  digested. 

407.30 
280.12 

12.24 
12.90 

51.58 
15.95 

109.82 
96.11 

226.13 
149.35 

7.53 
5.98 

Gluten  feed  digested,     . 
Per  cent,  ration  digested. 

127.18 
64.97 

31.78 

35.63 
68.38 

13.71 
65.52 

76.78 
68.73 

1.55 
46.03 

Per  cent,  gluten  feed  digested. 

93.87 

- 

92.96 

136.00 

95.88 

63.27 

Sheep  V. 


550  grams   minus   1.86   grams   waste 

548.14  grams  English  hay  fed. 
150  grams  gluten  feed  fed. 

equal 

s 

489.76 
135.48 

33.84 
4.55 

36.98 
38.33 

157.02 
10.07 

248.06 
80.08 

13.86 
2.45 

Amount  consumed. 

Minus  222.51  grams  feces  excreted. 

625.24 
206.82 

38.39 
29.24 

75.31 
23.70 

167.09 
52.64 

328.14 
92.72 

16.31 

8.52 

Amount  digested,  .... 
Minus  hay  digested. 

418.42 
279.16 

9.15 
12.86 

51.61 
15.90 

114.45 
95.78 

235.42 
148.84 

7.79 
5.96 

Gluten  feed  digested,     . 
Per  cent,  ration  digested. 

139.26 
66.92 

23.83 

35.71 
68.53 

18.67 
68.50 

86.58 
71.74 

1.83 
47.76 

Per  cent,  gluten  feed  digested. 

102.79 

- 

93.16 

185.00 

108.12 

74.69 

Two  sheep  only. 


DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH   SHEEP. 


287 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  - 

Series  XXI.,  English  Hat  and  Gluten  Feed,  —  Gluten  Feed, 

Concluded. 

Sheep  VI. 


Continued. 
-  Pebiod  1  - 


Item. 

< 

a 
1 

C 
o 

^ 

S 

a  o 

<D  03 

2 

fS 

Amount  consumed  as  for  Sheep  IV., 
Minus  211.77  grams  feces  excreted, 

626.91 
195.55 

38.51 
25.99 

75.43 
22.37 

167.62 
48.50 

328.99 
90.38 

16.36 
8.31 

Amount  digested 

Minus  hay  digested. 

431.36 
280.12 

12.52 
12.90 

53.06 
15.95 

119.12 
96.11 

238.61 
149.35 

8.05 
5.98 

Gluten  feed  digested,     . 
Per  cent,  ration  digested. 

151.24 
68.81 

32.51 

37.11 

70.34 

23.01 

71.07 

89.26 
72.53 

2.07 
49.21 

Per  cent,  gluten  feed  digested, 

111.63 

- 

96.82 

228.00 

111.46       84.49 

Average  per  cent,  ration  digested. 

66.90 

29.37 

69.08 

68.36 

71.00       47.67 

Average  per  cent,  gluten  feed  diges 

ed. 

102.76 

- 

94.31 

183.00 

105.15  1    74.15 

Series  XXI.,  English  PIay,  Period  2. 
Sheep  VII. 


700  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
Minus  301.12  grams  feces  excreted. 

Amount  digested 

Per  cent,  digested. 


623.84 
281.40 


342.44 
54.89 


43.11 
30.93 


12.18 
28.25 


47.10 
27.32 


19.78 
42.00 


200.01 
82.25 


315.97 
130.74 


117.76     185.23 
58.88       58.62 


17.65 
10.16 


7.49 
42.44 


Sheep  VIII. 


700  grams  English  hay  fed,    .... 
Minus  256.07  grams  feces  excreted. 

623.84 
238.91 

43.11 
26.88 

47.10 

25.87 

200.01 
63.88 

315.97 
112.51 

17.65 
9.77 

Amount  digested, 

Per  cent,  digested, 

384.93 
61.70 

16.23 
37.65 

21.33 
45.08 

136.13 
68.06 

203.46 
64.39 

7.88 
44.65 

Average  per  cent,  digested,      . 

58.30 

32.95 

43.54 

63.47 

61.51 

43.55 

288       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  —  Continued. 

Series  XXI.,  Vegetable  Ivory  Meal,  Period  3. 

Sheep  IV. 


Item. 


fa 


550  grams  English  hay  fed 

150  grams  gluten  feed  fed,      .... 

200  grams  minusl.86  grams  waste  equals  198.14 
grams  vegetable  ivory  meal  fed. 

Amount  consumed, 

Minus  258.16  grams  feces  excreted, 

Amount  digested,  .... 

Minus  hay  and  gluten  feed  digested. 

Vegetable  ivory  meal  digested, 

Per  cent,  digested. 


486.20 
135.66 
176.54 


798.40 
243.01 


555.39 
416.65 


138.74 
78.59 


32.48 
4.73 
2.10 


36.51 

38.05 

9.41 


158.21 
9.90 
15.45 


39.31 
24.45 


83.97 
32.37 


183.56 
61.36 


14.86 
10.79 


51.60 
51.45 


122.20 
114.31 


4.07 
193.81 


.15 
1.59 


7.89 
51.07 


245.05 
80.55 
146.83 


472.43 
115.26 


357.17 
231.18 


125.99 
85.81 


13.95 
2.43 
2.75 


19.13 
9.57 


9.56 

7.86 


1.70 
61.82 


Sheep  V. 


550  grams  minus  .7  gram  waste  equals  549.3 

grams  English  hay  fed. 
150  grams  gluten  feed  fed 

485.58 
135.66 

32.44 
4.73 

36.47 
38.05 

158.01 
9.90 

244.72 
80.55 

13.94 
2.43 

200  grams   minus    1.43  grams  waste  equals 
198.57  grams  vegetable  ivory  meal  fed. 

176.93 

2.11 

9.43 

15.48 

147.15 

2.76 

Amount  consumed, 

798.17 

39.28 

83.95 

183.39 

472.42 

19.13 

Minus  253.24  grams  feces  excreted. 

238.55 

33.64 

32.08 

53.72 

109.14 

9.97 

Amount  digested, 

559.62 

5.64 

51.87 

129.67 

363.28 

9.16 

Minus  hay  and  gluten  feed  digested,    . 

416.23 

10.78 

51.42 

114.18 

230.94 

7.86 

Vegetable  ivory  meal  digested, 

143.39 

- 

.45 

15.49 

132.34 

1.30 

Per  cent,  digested, 

81.04 

- 

4.77 

100.06 

89.94 

47.10 

Sheep  VI. 


550  grams  English  hay  fed,    .... 

486.20 

32.48 

36.51 

158.21 

245.05 

13.95 

150  grams  gluten  feed  fed,      .... 

135.66 

4.73 

38.05 

9.90 

80.55 

2.43 

200  grams  minus  1.57  grams  equals  198.43 
grams  vegetable  ivory  meal  fed. 

176.81 

2.10 

9.42 

15.47 

147.06 

2.76 

Amount  consumed, 

798.67 

39.31 

83.98 

183.58 

472.66 

19.14 

Miniis  248.26  grams  feces  excreted, 

233.44 

26.61 

31.96 

58.99 

106.22 

9.66 

Amount  digested 

565.23 

12.70 

52.02 

124.59 

366.44 

9.48 

Minus  hay  and  gluten  feed  digested,    . 

416.65 

10.79 

51.45 

114.31 

231.18 

7.86 

Vegetable  ivory  meal  digested, 

148.58 

1.91 

.57 

10.28 

135.26 

1.62 

Per  cent,  digested, 

84.03 

90.95 

6.04 

66.45 

91.98 

58.70 

Average  per  cent,  digested, 
1 

81.22 

142.38 > 

4.13 

72.53 

89.24 

55.87 

>  Two  sheep  only. 


DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH   SHEEP. 


289 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  —  Continued. 

Series  XXI.,  English  Hay  and  Wheat  Gluten  Flour,  Period  4.  i 

Sheep  VII. 


Item. 

< 

s 

p-i 

.a 

1 

700  grams  English  hay  fed,    .... 
40  grams  wheat  gluten  fed 

621.95 
37.18 

40.99 
.29 

47.21 
34.51 

203.19 
.03 

312.77 
2.20 

17.79 
.15 

Amount  consumed, 

Minus  293.60  grams  feces  excreted. 

659.13 

278.48 

41.28 
26.20 

81.72 

25.84 

203.22 
84.71 

314.97 
131.70 

17.94 
10.03 

Amount  digested, 

Minus  40  grams  wheat  gluten  (assumed  to  be 
all  digested). 

380.65 
37.18 

15.08 
.29 

55.88 
34.51 

118.51 
.03 

183.27 
2.20 

7.91 
.15 

English  hay  digested, 

Per  cent,  digested,          .        .        .        . 

343.47 
55.22 

14.79 
36.08 

21.37 
45.27 

118.48 
58.31 

181.07 
57.89 

7.76 
43.62 

Series  XXI.,  English  Hay,  Potato  Starch  and  Gluten  Meal  (Di.amond),  — 
Gluten  Meal  (Diamond),  Period  5. 

Sheep  IV. 


300  grams  English  hay  fed,    .... 

125  grams  potato  starch  fed, 

100  grams  gluten  meal  (Diamond)  fed. 

269.61 
111.95 
90.97 

18.52 
1.03 

20.03 
41.06 

91.05 

1.87 

132.95 
111.95 
45.46 

7.06 
1.55 

Amount  consumed, 

Minus  135.77  grams  feces  excreted. 

472.53 
126.67 

19.55 
15.76 

61.09 
17.64 

92.92 
33.21 

290.36 
56.23 

8.61 

5.83 

Amount  digested, 

Minus  hay  and  starch  (100  per  cent.)  digested. 

343.86 
265.62 

3.79 
6.85 

43.45 
8.61 

59.71 
55.54 

234.13         2.78 
191.72         3.03 

Gluten  meal  (Diamond)  digested. 

Per  cent,  ration  digested,       .... 

78.24 
72.77 

19.38 

34.84 
71.12 

4.17 
64.26 

42.41 
80.63 

32.29 

Per  cent,  gluten  meal  (Diamond)  digested,  . 

86.00 

- 

84.80 

- 

93.30 

Sheep  V. 


Amount  consumed  as  above. 
Minus  113.25  grams  feces  excreted. 

472.53 
107.36 

19.55 
17.71 

61.09 
15.07 

92.92 
23.48 

290.36 
46.02 

8.61 
5.08 

Amount  digested, 

Minus  hay  and  starch  (100  per  cent.)  digested, 

365.17 
265.62 

1.84 
6.85 

46.02 
8.61 

69.44 
55.54 

244.34 
191.72 

3.53 
3.03 

Gluten  meal  (Diamond)  digested. 

Per  cent,  ration  digested,       .... 

99.55 

77.28 
109.40 

9.41 

37.41 
75.33 

13.90 
74.73 

52.62 
84.15 

..50 
41.00 

Per  cent,  gluten  meal  (Diamond)  digested,  . 

- 

91.20 

- 

120.10 

32.25 

1  To  note  effect  of  wheat  gluten  flour. 


290       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  —  Continued. 

Series  XXI.,  English  Hat,  Potato  Starch  and  Gluten  Meal  (Diamond), - 
Gluten  Meal  (Diamond),  Period  5  —  Concluded. 

Sheep  VI. 


Item. 

o 

Q 

< 

2 

u 

1 

11 

.11 

i 

Amount  consumed  as  above. 
Minus  132.14  grams  feces  excreted, 

472.53 
125.27 

19.55 
16.95 

61.09 
17.15 

92.92 
31.17 

290.36 
54.46 

8.61 
5.54 

Amount  digested, 

Minus  hay  and  starch  (100  per  cent.)  digested. 

347.26 
265.62 

2.60 
6.85 

43.94 
8.61 

61.75 
55.54 

235.90 
191.72 

3.07 
3.03 

Gluten  meal  (Diamond)  digested, 

Per  cent,  ration  digested 

81.64 
73.49 

13.30 

35.33 
71.93 

6.21 
66.46 

44.18 
81.24 

35.66 

Per  cent,  gluten  meal  (Diamond)  digested,  . 

89.70 

- 

86.00 

- 

97.20 

- 

Average  per  cent,  ration  digested,  . 

74.51 

14.03 

72.79 

68.48 

82.01 

36.32 

Average  per  cent,  gluten  meal  (Diamond) 
digested. 

95.03 

- 

87.33 

- 

70.20 

32.25' 

Series  XXI.,  Distillers'  Grains,  Period  6. 
Sheep  IV. 


300  grams  English  hay  fed,    .... 

269.25 

17.91 

20.11 

89.42 

135.32 

6.49 

125  grams  potato  starch  fed. 

112.84 

- 

- 

- 

112.84 

- 

100  grams  gluten  meal  (Diamond)  fed. 

91.06 

1.06 

41.09 

2.03 

45.17 

1.71 

200  grams  distillers'  grains  fed. 

193.74 

4.48 

51.15 

28.50 

91.40 

18.21 

Ajnount  consumed, 

666.89 

23.45 

112.35 

119.95 

384.73 

26.41 

Minus  196.28  grams  feces  excreted, 

186.29 

17.90 

28.15 

45.25 

,86.46 

8.53 

Amount  digested, 

480.60 

5.55 

84.20 

74.70 

298 .27 

17.88 

Minus  basal  ration  digested. 

354.86 

2.66 

44.68 

62.19 

240.53 

2.95 

Distillers'  grains  digested,      .... 

125.74 

2.89 

39.52 

12.51 

57.74 

14.93 

Per  cent,  digested, 

64.88 

64.51 

77.26 

43.89 

63.17 

81.99 

Sheep  V. 


Amount  consumed  as  above. 

666.89 

23.45 

112.35 

119.95 

384.73 

26.41 

Minus  190.84  grams  feces  excreted, 

181.18 

19.84 

29.70 

39.90 

83.30 

8.44 

Amount  digested 

485.71 

3.61 

82.65 

80.05 

301.43 

17.97 

Minus  basal  ration  digested, 

354.86 

2.66 

44.68 

62.19 

240.53 

2.95 

Distillers'  grains  digested,      .... 

130.85 

.95 

37.97 

17.86 

60.90 

15.02 

Per  cent,  digested, 

67.54 

21.21 

74.23 

62.67 

66.63 

82.48 

'  One  sheep  only. 


DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH    SHEEP. 


291 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  —  Continued. 

Series  XXI.,  Distillers'  Grains,  Period  6  —  Concluded. 
Sheep  VI. 


Item. 

Q 

J3 

a 
o 

Ah 

.11 

i 

Amount  consumed  as  above, 
Minus  189.96  grams  feces  excreted. 

666.89 
180.41 

23.45 
19.75 

112.35 

28.16 

119.95 
42.09 

384.73 
80.99 

26.41 
9.42 

Amount  digested, 

Minus  basal  ration  digested. 

486.48 
354.86 

3.70 
2.66 

84.19 
44.68 

77.86 
62.19 

303.74 
240.53 

16.99 
2.95 

Distillers'  grains  digested,     .... 
Per  cent,  digested, 

131.62 
67.94 

1.04 

23.21 

39.51 

77.24 

15.67 
54.98 

63.21 
69.16 

14.04 
77.10 

Average  per  cent,  digested,     . 

66.79 

36.31 

76.24 

53.85 

66.32 

80.52 

Series  XXI.,  Corn  Bran,  Period  7. 
Sheep  IV. 


300  grams  English  hay  fed 

271.41 

18.40 

19.24 

87.20 

140.06 

6.51 

125  grams  potato  starch  fed, 

109.78 

- 

109.78 

- 

100  grams  gluten  meal  fed,    . 

91.55 

.88 

40.81 

1.85 

46.50 

1.51 

200  grams  corn  bran  fed. 

180.48 

2.35 

15.38 

23.84 

134.49 

4.42 

Amount  consumed. 

653.22 

21.63 

75.43 

112.89 

430.83 

12.44 

Minus  164.70  grams  feces  excreted. 

157.47 

14.74 

22.55 

36.25 

77.19 

6.74 

Amount  digested,  .... 

495.75 

6.89 

52.88 

76.64 

353.64 

5.70 

Minus  basal  ration  digested, 

354.56 
141.19 

2.70 

43.84 

60.55 

243.00 

2.89 

Corn  bran  digested, 

4.19 

9.04 

16.09 

110.64 

2.81 

Per  cent,  digested. 

78.23 

178.29 

58.78 

67.49 

82.27 

63.57 

Sheep  V. 


Amount  consumed  as  above. 

653.22 

21.63 

75.43 

112.89 

430.83 

12.44 

Minus  157.82  grams  feces  excreted, 

150.86 

14.92 

28.12 

29.43 

71.72 

6.67 

Amount  digested 

502.36 

6.71 

47.31 

83.46 

359.11 

5.77 

Minus  basal  ration  digested. 

354.56 

2.70 

43.89 

60.55 

243.00 

2.89 

Corn  bran  digested 

147.80 

4.01 

3.47 

22.91 

116.11 

2.88 

Per  cent,  digested, 

81.89 

170.63 

22.56 

96.10 

86.33 

65.16 

292       MASS.   EXPERIMENT    STATION    BULLETIN    181. 


Table  V.  ■ —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  —  Continued. 

Series  XXI.,  Corn  Bran,  Period  7  —  Concluded. 

Sheep  VI. 


Item. 

a 
>> 

P 

to 

< 

a 
1 

Oh 

S  O 

2 

Amount  consumed  as  above, 
Minus  169.38  grams  feces  excreted, 

653.22 
162.10 

21.63 
18.75 

75.43 
22.08 

112.89 
40.61 

430.83 
74.58 

12.44 
6.08 

Amount  digested 

Minus  basal  ration  digested, 

491.12 
354.56 

2.88 
2.70 

53.35 
43.84 

72.28 
60.55 

356.25 
243.00 

6.36 

2.89 

Corn  bran  digested 

Per  cent,  digested, 

136.56 
75.66 

.18 
7.66 

9.51 
61.83 

11.73 
49.20 

113.25 
84.21 

3.47 
78.51 

Average  per  cent,  digested, 

78.59 

152.19 

47.72 

70.93 

84.27 

69.08 

Series  XXI.,  New  Bedford  Garb.\ge  Tankage,  Period  8. 
Sheep  IV.  ^ 


550  grams  English  hay  fed,    .... 

150  grams  gluten  feed  fed 

150 grams  New  Bedford  garbage  tankage  fed. 

497.86 
136.58 
137.21 

34.65 
4.67 
21.57 

36.19 
38.05 
30.21 

167.93 
9.97 
13.27 

246.00 
81.53 
69.87 

13.09 
2.36 
2.29 

Amount  consumed, 

Minus  286.48  grams  feces  excreted. 

771.65 
272.18 

60.89 
35.87 

104.45 
42.98 

191.17 
67.58 

397.40 
117.31 

17.74 
8.44 

Amount  digested 

Minus  basal  ration  digested. 

499.47 
425.07 

25.02 
11.40 

61.47 
51.23 

123.59 
120.97 

280.09 
232.55 

9.30 
7.42 

New  Bedford  garbage  tankage  digested. 
Per  cent,  digested, 

74.40 
54.22 

13.62 
63.14 

10.24 
33.90 

2.62 
19.74 

47.54 
68.04 

1.88 
82.09 

Sheep  V. 


550  grams  English  hay  fed,    .... 
Minus  29.28  grams  waste  hay, 

497.86 
26.36 

34.65 
1.83 

36.19 
1.88 

167.93 
8.76 

246.00 
13.27 

13.09 
.62 

English  hay  consumed,           .... 

150  grams  gluten  feed  fed,      . 

150  grams  New  Bedford  garbage  tankage  fed. 

471.50 
136.58 
137.21 

32.82 
4.67 
21.57 

34.31 
38.05 
30.21 

159.17 
9.97 
13.27 

232.73 
81.53 
69.87 

12.47 
2.36 
2.29 

Amount  consumed 

Minus  244.60  grams  feces  excreted. 

745.29 
231.78 

59.06 
32.43 

102.57 
43.57 

182.41 
48.05 

384.13 
100.10 

17.12 
7.63 

Amount  digested, 

Minus  basal  ration  digested. 

513.51 
407.41 

26.63 
10.87 

59.00 
49.93 

134.36 
115.02 

284.03 
223.12 

9.49 
7.12 

New  Bedford  garbage  tankage  digested. 
Per  cent,  digested, 

106.10 
77.33 

15.76 
73.06 

9.07 
30.02 

19.34 
145.80 

60.91 

87.18 

2.37 
103.48 

1  Exclutle  d  from  average. 


DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH   SHEEP. 


293 


Table  Y.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  —  Continued. 
Series  XXI.,  New  Bedford  Garbage  Tankage,  Period  8  —  Coyiduded. 

Sheep  VI. 


Item. 

o 

Q 

J3 
< 

'S 
o 

M  •- 

St? 
2: 

1 

Amount  consumed  as  for  Sheep  IV.,     . 
Minus  247.68  grams  feces  excreted, 

771.65 
235.27 

60.89 
33.48 

104.45 
39.57 

191.17 
54.70 

397.40 
100.56 

17.74 
6.96 

Amount  digested 

Minus  basal  ration  digested, 

536.38 
425.07 

27.41 
11.40 

64.88 
51.23 

136.47 
120.97 

296.84 
232.55 

10.78 
7.42 

New  Bedford  garbage  tankage  digested. 
Per  cent,  digested, 

111.31 
81.12 

16.01 
74.22 

13.65 
45.18 

15.50 
116.80 

64.29 
92.01 

3.36 
147.00 

Average  per  cent,  digested, 

79.22 

73.64 

37.60 

131.30 

89.60 

125.24 

Series  XXI.,  English  Hay,  Period  9. 
Sheep  IX. 


600  grams  English  hay  fed,    .... 

533.40 

37.66 

39.95 

172.66 

268.89 

14.24 

Minus  14.24  grams  waste 

14.01 

1.29 

.90 

4.64 

6.87 

.31 

Amount  consumed, 

519.39 

36.37 

39.05 

168.02 

262.02 

13.93 

Minus  228.28  grams  feces  excreted. 

217.07 

21.73 

22.58 

62.75 

102.56 

7.45 

English  hay  digested 

302.32 

14.64 

16.47 

105.27 

159.46 

6.48 

Per  cent,  digested, 

58.21 

40.25 

42.18 

62.65 

60.86 

46.52 

Sheep  X. 


600  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
Minus  244.22  grams  feces  excreted, 
English  hay  digested,     . 
Per  cent,  digested, 


533.40 

37.66 

39.95 

172.66 

268.89 

232.72 

21.29 

21.25 

70.17 

111.59 

300.68 

16.37 

18.70 

102.49 

157.30 

56.37 

43.47 

46.81 

59.36 

58.50 

14.24 

8.42 


5.82 
40.87 


Sheep  XI. 


600  grams  English  hay  fed,    .... 
Minus  2.43  grams  waste,         .... 

533.40 
2.36 

37.66 
.27 

39.95 
.09 

172.66 
.85 

268.89 
1.12 

14.24 
.03 

English  hay  consumed,          .... 
Minus  257.55  grams  feces  excreted. 

531.04 
245.24 
285.80 
53.82 

37.39 
23.13 

39.86 
23.89 

171.81 
74.80 

267.77 
114.79 

14.21 
8.63 

English  hay  digested 

Per  cent,  digested, 

14.26 
38.14 

15.97 
40.07 

97.01 
56.46 

152.98 
57.13 

5.58 
39.27 

Average  per  cent,  digested. 

56.13 

40.62 

43.02 

59.49 

58.83 

42.22 

294       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    ISl. 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  —  Continued. 

Series  XXI.,  English  Hay  and  Wheat  Gluten  Flour,  Period  10.* 

Sheep  IV. 


Item. 

>> 
Q 

2 
'S 
o 

o 
.a 

% 
f^ 

800  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
Minus  60.57  grams  waste, 
English  hay  consumed, 

714.96 
60.57 
654.39 

49.55 

4.20 

45.35_ 

52.26 

4.43 

47.83 

235.29 

19.93 

215.36 

359.20 

30.43 

328.77 

18.66 
1.58 
17.08 

50  grams  wheat  gluten  fed,    . 
Minus  34.71  grams  waste, 
Wheat  gluten  consumed, 

47.48 
34.71 
12.77 

.42 
.31 
.11 

42.35 
30.95 
11.40 

.04 
.03 
.01 

3.88 
2.84 
1.04 

.79 
.58 
.21 

Amount  consumed. 

Minus  264.12  grams  feces  excreted. 

667.16 
252.60 

45.46 
24.30 

59.23 
25.51 

215.37 
74.01 

329.81 
118.27 

17.29 
10.51 

Amount  digested 

Minus  wheat  gluten  digested, 

414.56 
12.77 

21.16 
.11 

33.72 
11.40 

141.36 
.01 

211.54 
1.04 

6.78 
.21 

English  hay  digested,     . 
Per  cent,  digested. 

401.79 
61.40 

21.05 

46.42 

22.32 
46.67 

141.35 
65.63 

210.50 
64.03 

6.57 
38.47 

Sheep  VI. 


800  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
50  grams  wheat  gluten  fed,    . 

714.96 

47.48 

49.55 
.42 

52.26 
42.35 

235.29 
.04 

359.20 
3.88 

18.66 
.79 

Amount  consumed, 

Minus  288.47  gram.s  feces  excreted. 

762.44 
275.89 

49.97 
27.56 

94.61 
28.14 

235.33 
77.17 

363.08 
131.65 

19.45 
11.37 

Anaount  digested 

Minus  wheat  gluten  digested, 

486.55 
47.48 

22.41 
.42 

66.47 
42.35 

158.16 
.04 

231.43 

3. 88 

8.08 
.79 

EngUsh  hay  digested,     . 
Per  cent,  digested, 

439.07 
61.41 

21.99 
44.38 

24.12 
46.15 

158.12 
67.20 

227.55 
63.35 

7.29 
39.07 

Average  per  cent,  digested. 

61.41 

45.40 

46.41 

66.42 

63.69 

38.77 

i ,      ......     .....     ..       -         .3 

To  note  effect  of  wheat  gluten  flour. 


DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH   SHEEP. 


295 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  —  Continued. 

Series  XXI.,  English  Hay  and  Gluten  Feed,  —  Gluten  Feed,  Period  11. 

Sheep  V. 


Item. 

Q 

< 

.9 
o 

o 

2; 

550  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
150  grams  gluten  feed  fed,      . 

499.40 
137.31 

42.65 
4.63 

50.94 
38.57 

152.27 
10.50 

240.01 
81.10 

13.53 
2.51 

Amount  consumed, 

Minus  198.58  grams  feces  excreted, 

636.71 

187.88 

47.28 
28.13 

89.51 
26.55 

162.77 
42.63 

321.11 
82.38 

16.04 
8.19 

Amount  digested 

Minus  hay  digested. 

448.83 
294.65 

19.15 
15.78 

62.96 
27.00 

120.14 
95.93 

238.73 
153.60 

7.85 
6.90 

Gluten  feed  digested,     . 
Per  cent,  ration  digested, 

154.18 
70.49 

3.37 
40.50 

35.96 
70.34 

24.21 
73.81 

85.13 
74.35 

.95 
48.94 

Per  cent,  gluten  feed  digested. 

112.30 

73.00 

93.20 

231.00 

105.00 

38.00 

Sheep  VI. 


Amount  consumed  as  above. 
Minus  193.37  grams  feces  excreted, 

636.71 
183.55 

47.28 
30.78 

89.51 
25.79 

162.77 
39.61 

321.11 
79.50 

16.04 
7.87 

Amount  digested,  .... 
Minus  hay  digested. 

453.16 
294.65 

16.50 
15.78 

63.72 
27.00 

123.16 
95.93 

241.61 
153.60 

8.17 
6.90 

Gluten  feed  digested,     . 
Per  cent,  ration  digested. 

158.51 
71.17 

.72 
34.90 

36.72 
71.19 

27.23 
75:67 

88.01 
75.24 

1.27 
50.94 

Per  cent,  gluten  feed  digested. 

115.40 

15.00 

95.10 

259.00 

108.50 

51.00 

Average  per  cent,  ration  digested. 

70.83 

37.70 

70.77 

74.74 

74.80 

49.94 

Average  per  cent,  gluten  feed  diges 

ed. 

113.85 

44.00 

94.15 

245.00 

106.75 

44.50 

Series  XXI.,  Feterita,  Period  12. 
Sheep  V. 


550  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
150  grams  gluten  feed  fed,      . 
200  grams  feterita  fed,    . 

495.94 
137.25 
179.18 

41.96 
4.68 
3.23 

47.86 
38.35 
23.71 

151.61 
10.14 
2.51 

240.97 
81.94 
143.75 

13.54 
2.14 
5.98 

Amount  consumed. 

Minus  244.74  grams  feces  excreted. 

812.37 
229.57 

49.87 
35.51 

109.92 
35.72 

164.26 
49.56 

466.66 
98.59 

21.66 
10.19 

Amount  digested,  .... 
Minus  hay  and  gluten  feed  digested. 

582.80 
449.56 

14.36 
17.72 

74.20 
61.21 

114.70 
121.31 

368.07 
242.18 

11.47 
7.84 

Feterita  digested 

Per  cent,  digested. 

133.24 
74.36 

- 

12.99 
54.79 

- 

125.89 
87.58 

3.63 
60.70 

296       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  • —  Continued. 
Series  XXI.,  Feterita,  Period  12  —  Concluded. 
Sheep  VI. 


Item. 

a 

■J 
p 

C 

1 

S   X 

Is 

i 

Amount  consumed. as  above, 
Minus  243.61  grams  feces  excreted. 

812.37 
228.55 

49.87 
32.25 

109.92 
39.63 

164.26 
48.43 

466.66 
97.57 

21.66 
10.67 

Amount  digested, 

Minus  hay  and  gluten  feed  digested,     . 

583.82 
449.56 

17.62 

17.72 

70.29 
61.21 

115.83 
121.31 

396.09 
242.18 

10.99 

7.84 

Feterita  digested 

Per  cent,  digested, 

134.26 
74.93 

~ 

9.08 
38.30 

~ 

126.91 
88.29 

3.15 
52.68 

Average  per  cent,  digested. 

74.65 

- 

46.55 

- 

87.94 

56.69 

Series  XXI.,  English  Hay,  Period  13. 
Sheep  XII. 


700  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
Minus  259.31  grams  feces  excreted, 
English  hay  digested,     . 
Per  cent,  digested. 


634.55 

52.48 

57.87 

197.09 

309.85 

243.98 

31.96 

26.15 

68.39 

109.38 

390.57 

20.52 

31.72 

128.70 

200.47 

60.69 

39.10 

54.81 

65.30 

64.70 

17.26 
8.10 


9.16 
53.07 


Sheep  XIII. 


700  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 

Minus  6.43  grams  waste, 

Amount  consiuned, 

Minus  266.30  grams  feces  excreted 

English  hay  digested,     . 

Per  cent,  digested, 


634.55 
6.23 


628.32 
250.38 


377.94 
60.15 


52.48 
.38 


52.10 
33.40 


18.70 
35.89 


57.87 
.27 


57.60 
26.49 


31.11 
54.01 


197.09 
2.54 


194.55 
72.71 


121.84 
62.63 


309.85 
2.98 


306.87 
108.97 


197.90 
64.49 


17.26 
.06 


17.20 
8.81 


8.39 
48.78 


Sheep  XIV. 


700  grams  English  hay  fed 

Minus  280.22  grams  feces  excreted. 

634.55 
263.60 

52.48 
33.95 

57.87 
28.42 

197.09 
76.73 

309.85 
115.91 

17.26 
8.59 

English  hay  digested 

Per  cent,  digested, 

370.95 
57.64 

18.53 
35.31 

29.45 
50.89 

120.36 
61.07 

193.94 
62.59 

8.67 
50.23 

Average  per  cent,  digested, 

59.49 

36.77 

53.24 

63.00 

63.93 

50.69 

DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   AVITH   SHEEP. 


297 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  ■ —  Continued. 

Series  XXI.,  Sweet  Clover  (Green),  Period  14. 

Sheep  IV. 


Item. 

"S 

>> 

Q 

< 

c 
"3 
g 

s 

St. 
■z 

500  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
1,600  grams  sweet  clover. 

442.15 
264.80 

35.81 
25.31 

39.93 
45.89 

138.13 
89.50 

216.17 
96.53 

12.11 

7.57 

Amount  consumed. 

Minus  302.46  grams  feces  excreted. 

706.95 
274.48 

61.12 
35.74 

85.82 
30.11 

227.63 
86.41 

312.70 
112.50 

19.68 
9.72 

Amount  digested,  .... 
Minus  hay  digested. 

432.47 
260.87 

25.38 
13.25 

55.71 
21.16 

141.22 
87.02 

200.20 
138.35 

9.96 
6.18 

Sweet  clover  digested,    . 
Per  cent,  digested, 

171.60 
64.80 

12.13 
47.93 

34.55 
75.29 

54.20 
60.56 

61.85 
64.07 

3.78 
49.91 

Sheep  VI. 


1,600  grams  sweet  clover  fed. 

Minus  26.14  grams  waste,       .... 

264.80 
24.94 

25.31 

2.27 

45.89 
2.47 

89.50 
11.78 

96.53 
8.11 

7.57 
.31 

Sweet  clover  consumed,         .... 
500  grams  English  hay  consumed. 

239.86 
442.15 

23.04 
35.81 

43.42 
39.93 

77.72 
138.13 

88.42 
216.17 

7.26 
12.11 

Amount  consumed, 

Minus  270.07  grams  feces  excreted, 

682.01 
245.33 
436.68 
260.87 

58.85 
34.32 

83.35 
28.07 

215.85 
72.59 

304.59 
100.81 

19.37 
9.54 

Amount  digested 

Minus  hay  digested, 

24.53 
13.25 

55.28 
21.16 

143.26 
87.02 

203.78 
138.35 

9.83 
6.18 

Sweet  clover  digested, 

Per  cent,  digested, 

175.81 
73.30 

11.28 
48.96 

34.12 

78.58 

56.24 
72.36 

65.43 
74.00 

3.65 
50.28 

Average  per  cent,  digested. 

69.05 

48.45 

76.94 

66.46 

69.04 

50.10 

Series  XXII.,  Sudan  Grass  (Green,  Second  Crop),  Period  1. 
Sheep'lV. 


500  grams  English  hay  fed 

433.50 

33.42 

39.75 

131.31 

218.05 

10.97 

1,600  grams  Sudan  grass  (green,  fourth  cut- 
ting) fed. 

367.00 

24.44 

44.29 

104.79 

190.67 

11.81 

Amount  consumed, 

809.50 

57.86 

84.04 

236.10 

408.72 

22.78 

Minus  316.87  grams  feces  excreted, 

294.78 

39.71 

35.93 

72.78 

135.72 

10.64 

Amount  digested 

514.72 

18.15 

48.11 

163.32 

273.00 

12.14 

Minus  hay  digested 

268.77 

9.36 

20.27 

90.60 

143.91 

4.52 

Sudan  grass  digested, 

245.95 

8.79 

27.84 

72.72 

129.09 

7.64 

Per  cent,  digested, 

65.41 

37.97 

62.86 

69.40 

67.70 

64.69 

298       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN   181. 


Table  V.  • —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  —  Continued. 
Sehies  XXII.,  Sudan  Grass  (Green,  Second  Crop),  Period  1  —  Concluded. 

Sheep  VI. 


Item. 

0 

"4, 
< 

.S 
o 

§1 

M  J- 

i 

Amount  consumed  as  above, 
Minus  318.78  grams  feces  excreted, 

809.50 
295.99 

57.86 
42.56 

84.04 
33.62 

236.10 

72.75 

408.72 
135.68 

22.78 
11.37 

Amount  digested 

Minus  hay  digested, 

513.51 
268.77 

15.30 
9.36 

50.42 
20.27 

163.35 
90.60 

273.04 
143.91 

11.41 
4.50 

Sudan  grass  digested 

Per  cent,  digested, 

244.74 
65.09 

5.94 
24.30 

30.15 
68.07 

72.75 
69.42 

129.13 
67.69 

6.91 
58.51 

Average  per  cent,  digested, 

65.25 

30.14 

65.47 

69.41 

67.70 

61.60 

Series  XXII.,  English  Hay,  Period  2. 
Sheep  IV. 


800  grams  English  hay  fed,    .... 
Minus  285.59  grams  feces  excreted. 

685.36 
265.88 

52.02 
36.77 

59.28 
27.49 

218.84     337.75 
70.96     120.34 

17.48 
10.32 

English  hay  digested 

Per  cent,  digested, 

419.48 
61.21 

15.25 
29.31 

31.79 
53.63 

147.88 
67.57 

217.41 
64.37 

7.16 
40.96 

Sheep  VI. 


Amount  consumed  as  above. 
Minus  276.71  grams  feces  excreted. 

685.36 
256.90 

52.02 
38.18 

59.28 
30.85 

218.84 
65.18 

337.75 
112.32 

17.48 
10.38 

English  hay  digested, 

Per  cent,  digested, 

428.46 
62.52 

13.84 
26.61 

28.43 
47.96 

153.66 
70.21 

225.43 
66.75 

7.10 
40.62 

Average  per  cent,  digested,     . 

61.87 

27.96 

50.80 

68.89 

65.56 

40.79 

Series  XXII.,  Sudan  Grass  (Dry,  Second  Crop),  Period  3. 
Sheep  IV. 


400  grams  English  hay  fed,    .... 

353.00 

28.45 

33.43 

107.49 

174.63 

9.00 

500  grams  Sudan  grass  (dry,  fourth  cutting) 
fed. 

390.60 

33.55 

53.00 

129.99 

167.68 

6.37 

Amount  consumed, 

743.60 

62.00 

86.43 

237.48 

342.31 

15.37 

Minus  309.29  grams  feces  excreted, 

290.42 

38.92 

38.57 

67.61 

135.92 

9.41 

Amount  digested, 

453.18 

23.08 

47.86 

169.87 

*206.39 

5.96 

Minus  hay  digested 

218.86 

7.96 

17.05 

74.17 

115.26 

3.69 

Sudan  grass  digested 

234.32 

15.12 

30.81 

95.70 

91.13 

2.27 

Per  cent,  digested, 

59.99 

45.07 

58.13 

73.62 

54.35 

35.63 

DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH   SHEEP. 


299 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  —  Continued. 

Series  XXII.,  Sudan  Grass  (Dry,  Second  Crop),  Period  3  —  Concluded. 

Sheep  VI. 


Item. 

o 

Q 

< 

2 

O 

2 
a  2 

P. 

1 

Amount  consumed  as  above, 
Minus  313.86  grams  feces  excreted. 

743.00 
292.83 

62.00 
40.53 

86.43 
36.84 

237.48 
68.73 

342.31 
137.31 

15.37 
9.43 

Amount  digested, 

Minus  hay  digested, 

450.77 
218.86 

21.47 
7.96 

49.59 
17.05 

168.75 
74.17 

205.00 
115.26 

5.94 
3.69 

Sudan  grass  digested 

Per  cent,  digested, 

321.91 
59.37 

13.51 
40.27 

32.54 
61.40 

94.58 
72.76 

89.74 
53.52 

2.25 
35.32 

Average  per  cent,  digested. 

59.68 

42.67 

59.77 

73.19 

53.94 

35.48 

Series  XXII.,  Sudan  Gr.-^.ss  (First  Crop,  Third  Cutting),  Period  4. 

Sheep  IX. 


700  grams  Sudan  grass  (third  cutting,  dry) 

fed. 
Minus  270.21  grams  feces  excreted, 

Sudan'grass  digested 

Per  cent,  digested, 


616.00 
258.02 


357.98 
58.11 


45.40 
21.11 


24.29 
53.50 


73.24 
27.56 


45.68 
62.37 


220.47 
74.23 


146.24 
66.33 


268.02 
130.04 


137.98 
51.48 


8.87 
5.08 


3.79 
42.73 


Sheep  XI. 


700  grams  Sudan  grass  (third  cutting,  dry) 

fed. 
Minus  292.87  grams  feces  excreted, 

616.00 
278.93 

45.40 
26.22 

73.24 
30.96 

220.47 
77.60 

268.02 
138.32 

8.87 
5.80 

Sudan  grass  digested 

Per  cent,  digested, 

337.07 
54.72 

19.18 

42.25 

42.28 
47.73 

142.87 
64.80 

129.70 
48.39 

3.07 
34.61 

Average  per  cent,  digested,     . 

56.42 

47.88 

60.05 

65.57 

49.94 

38.67 

Series  XXII.,  Sudan  Grass  (First  Crop,  Second  Cutting),  Period  6. 

Sheep  IX. 


700  grams  Sudan  grass  (second  cutting,  dry) 

fed. 
Minus  266.71  grams  feces  excreted. 

616.49 
251.56 

59.61 
26.54 

95.49 
34.03 

205.41 
64.90 

246.53 
119.29 

9.433 
6.79' 

Sudan  grass  digested, 

364.93 

33.07 

61.46 

140.51 

127.24 

2.64 

Per  cent,  digested, 

59.19 

55.48 

64.36 

68.40 

51.57 

28.00 

[                                                                                                : 

300       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 


Table  V.  —  Computation'  of  Digestion  Coefficients  —  Continued. 
Series  XXII.,  Sudan  Grass  (First  Crop,  First  Cutting),  Period  7. 

Sheep  XI. 


Item. 

o 
la 

P 

< 

'S 
p 

o  -^ 

.■sa 

1 

700  grams  Sudan  grass  (first  cutting,  dry)  fed, 
Minus  5.57  grams  of  waste,    .... 

615.44 
5.23 

61.97 
.69 

88.93 
.49 

204.33 
2.15 

250.73 
1.84 

9.48 
.05 

Amount  consumed, 

Minus  283.26  grams  feces  excrete  1, 

610.21 
266.94 

61.28 
27.01 

88.44 
38.36 

202.18 
67.96 

248.89 
126.34 

9.43 
7.26 

Sudan  grass  (first  cutting)  digested, 

Per  cent,  digested, 

343.27 
56.25 

34.27 
55.92 

50.08 
56.63 

134.22 
66.38 

122.55 
49.24 

2.17 
23.  dl 

Sheep  XII. 


700  grams  Sudan  grass  (first  cutting,  dry)  fed. 
Minus  94.43  grams  of  waste,  .... 

615.44 
81.92 

61.97 
10.78 

88.93 
9.72 

204 . 33 
29.42 

250.73 
31.09 

9.48 
.91 

Amount  consumed, 

Minus  253.21  grams  feces  excreted, 

533.52 
239.33 

51.19 

24.87 

79.21 
35.47 

174.91 
58.73 

219.64 
112.58 

8.57 
7.68 

Sudan  grass  (first  cutting)  digested. 
Per  cent,  digested,          .        . 

294.19 
55.14 

26.32 
51.42 

43.74 

55.22 

116.18 
66.42 

107.06' 

48.74 

.89 
10.38 

Sheep  XIII. 


700  grams  Sudan  grass  (first  cutting,  dry)  fed. 
Minus  278.76  grams  feces  excreted. 

615.44 
263.73 

61.97 
26.69 

88.93 
37,50 

204.33 
67.80 

250.73 
124.11 

9.48 
7.62 

Sudan  grass  (first  cutting)  digested, 

Per  cent,  digested, 

351.71 
57.15 

35.28 
56.93 

51.43 
57.83 

136.53 

66.82 

126.62 
50.51 

1.86 
19.62 

Average  per  cent,  digested,      . 

56.18 

54.76 

56.56 

66.54 

49.50 

17.67 

Series  XXII.,  English  H-vy,  Period  S. 
Sheep  IV. 


800  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
Minus  295.57  grams  feces  excreted, 
English  hay  digested,     . 
Per  cent,  digested. 


719.36 
279.11 


440.25 
61.20 


49.28 
29.20 


20.08 
40.75 


59.35 
29.50 


29  85 
50.30 


236.60 
77.65 


158.95 
67.18 


357.23 
133.42 


223.81 
62.65 


16.90 
9.35 


7.55 
44.67 


DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH    SHEEP. 


301 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion*  Coefficients  —  Continued. 

Series  XXII.,  English  Hay,  Period  S  —  Concluded. 

Sheep  VI. 


Item. 

< 

'S 
2 

o 

It 
.t;W 

s 
fe 

800  grams  English  hay  fed 

Minus  282.37  grams  feces  excreted. 

719.33 
266.70 

49.28 
28.51 

59.35 

28.86 

236.60 
72.62 

357.23 
127.51 

16.90 
9.20 

English  hay  digested, 

Per  cent,  digested, 

442.66 
61.54 

20.77 
42.15 

30.49 
51.37 

163.98 
69.31 

229.72 
64.31 

7.70 
45.56 

Average  per  cent,  digested. 

61.37 

41.45 

50.84 

68.25 

63.48 

45.12 

Series  XXII.,  Vinegar  Grains,  Period  9. 
Sheep  IX. 


250  grams  vinegar  grains  fed, 
550  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 

230.55 
495.72 

5.79 
35.59 

47.40 
41.49 

46.41 
167.55 

116.01 
239.18 

14.94 
11.90 

Amount  consumed. 

Minus  309.94  grams  feces  excreted, 

726.27 
297.60 

41.38 
27.14 

88.89 
37.91 

213.96 
78.21 

355.19 
145.44 

26.84 
8.90 

Amount  digested 

Minus  English  hay  digested, 

428.67 
302.39 

14.24 
14.59 

50.98 
21.16 

135.75 
113.93 

209.75 
150.68 

17.94 
5  36 

Vinegar  grains  digested, 
Per  cent,  digested. 

126.28 
54.77 

- 

29.82 
62.91 

21.82 
47.02 

59.07 
50.92 

12.58 
84.20 

Sheep  XI. 


Amount  consumed  as  above, 
Minus  318.83  grams  feces  excreted. 

726.27 
297.05 

41.38 
29.11 

88.89 
39.63 

213.96 
76.55 

355.19 
143.45 

26.84 
8.32 

Amount  digested, 

Minus  English  hay  digested. 

429.22 
302.39 

12.27 
14  59 

49.26 
21.16 

137.41 
113.93 

211.74 
150.68 

18.52 
5.36 

Vinegar  grains  digested,          .... 
Per  cent,  digested, 

126.83 
55.01 

: 

28.10 
59.28 

23.48 
50.59 

61.06 
52.63 

13.16 

88.08 

Average  per  cent,  digested,      . 

54.89 

- 

61.10 

48.80 

51.77 

86.14 

302       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 


Table  V.  • —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  —  Continued. 

Series  XXII.,  Vinegar  Grains,  Period  10. 

Sheep  IV. 


Item. 

o 
C3 

p 

.a 

< 

's 

E 

t-l 

+3 

250  grams  vinegar  grains  fed, 
550  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 

231.33 
495.00 

5.95 
36.23 

46.77 
43.07 

46.54 
159.10 

116.45 
244.33 

15.61 
12.18 

Amount  consumed, 

Minus  285.43  grams  feces  excreted. 

726.33 
272.59 

42.18 
25.60 

89.84 
35.38 

205.64 
69.10 

360.78 
143.14 

27.79 
8.37 

Amount  digested,  .... 
Minus  English  hay  digested, 

453.74 
301.95 

16.58 
14.85 

54.46 
21.97 

136.54 
108.19 

217.64 
153.93 

19.42 
5.48 

Vinegar  grains  digested. 
Per  cent,  digested, 

151.79 
65.60 

1.73 
29.08 

32.49 
69.47 

28.35 
60.92 

63.71 
54.71 

13.94 
89.30 

Sheep  VI. 


Amount  consumed  as  above, 
Minus  281.57  grams  feces  excreted. 

726.33 

268.28 

42.18 
28.97 

89.84 
37.00 

205.64 
63.07 

360.78 
130.46 

27.79 

8.77 

Amount  digested 

Minus  English  hay  digested, 

458.05 
301.95 

13.21 
14.85 

52.84 
21.97 

142.57 
108.19 

230.32 
153.93 

19.02 
5.48 

Vinegar  grains  digested,          .... 
Per  cent,  digested, 

156.10 
67.48 

- 

30.87 
66.00 

34.38 

73.87 

76.39 
65.60 

13.54 
86.70 

Average  per  cent,  digested, 

66.54 

29.081 

67.74 

67.40 

59.66 

88.00 

Series  XXII.,  Stevens'  "44"  Dairy  Ration,  Period  11. 
Sheep  IV. 


250  grams  of  Stevens'  "44"  Dairy  Ration  fed, 
550  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
Amount  consumed, 
Minus  269.57  grams  feces  excreted. 
Amount  digested,  .... 
Minus  English  hay  digested, 
Stevens'  "44"  Dairy  Ration  digested 
Per  cent,  digested, 


227.65 
499.13 


726.78 
257.14 


469.64 
304.47 


165.17 
72.55 


9.49 
33.69 


43.18 
26.90 


16.28 
13.81 


2.47 
26.03 


61.35 
41.08 


102.43 
31.09 


71.34 
20.95 


50.39 
82.14 


29.32 
164.56 


193.88 


125.20 
111.90 


13.30 
45.36 


112.82 
247.47 


360.29 
122.50 


237.79 
155.90 


81.89 
72.58 


14.66, 
12.33 


26.99 
7.97 


19.02 
5.55 


13.47 
91.88 


1  One  sheep  only. 


DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH   SHEEP. 


303 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  —  Continued. 
Series  XXII.,  Stevens'    "44"  Dairy  Ration,  Period  11  —  Concluded. 

Sheep  VI. 


Item. 

Q 

< 

.s 

'S 
o 

S 

Amount  consumed  as  above, 
Minus  277.79  grams  feces  excreted, 

726.78 
266.18 

43.18 
30.93 

102.43 
34.10'' 

193.88 

65.85 

360.29 
126.28 

26.99 
9.02 

Amount  digested, 

Minus  English  hay  digested. 

460.60 
304.47 

12.25 
13.81 

68.33 
20.95 

128.03 
111.90 

234.01 
155.90 

15.97 
6.55 

Stevens'  "44"  Dairy  Ration  digested, 

Per  cent,  digested, 

156.13 

68.58 

~ 

47.38 
77.23 

16.13 
55.01 

78.11 
69.23 

10.42 
71.08 

Average  per  cent,  digested. 

70.57 

26.03' 

79.69 

50.19 

70.91 

81.48 

Series  XXII.,  New  York  Alfalfa  (Third  Cutting),  Period  2. 
Sheep  IV. 


800  grams  New  York  alfalfa  (third  cutting) 

fed. 
Minus  306.21  grams  feces  excreted. 


Alfalfa  digested, 
Per  cent,  digested. 


700.96 

42.27 

105.92 

248.28 

291.11 

293.69 

24.73 

28.43 

131.78 

97.59 

407.27 

17.54 

77.49 

116.50 

193.52 

58.10 

41.50 

73.16 

46.92 

66.48 

13  39 
11.16 


2.23 
16.66 


Sheep  VI. 


800  grams  New  York  alfalfa  (third  cutting) 

fed. 
Minus  4.57  grams  waste,         .... 

700.96 

42.27 

105.92 

248.28 

291.11 

13.39 

4.14 

.17 

.27 

2.19 

1.47 

.03 

Amount  consumed 

696.82 

42.10 

105.65 

246.09 

289.64 

13.36 

Minus  330.53  grams  feces  excreted. 

315.33 

30.27 

33.61 

134.99 

105.13 

11.32 

Alfalfa  digested 

381.49 

11.83 

20.04 

111.10 

184.51 

2.04 

Per  cent,  digested, 

54.75 

28.10 

68.19 

45.15 

63.70 

15.27 

Average  per  cent,  digested,      . 

56.43 

34.80 

70.68 

46.04 

65.09 

15.97 

Series  XXII.,  English  Hay,  Period  13. 
Sheep  XII. 


700  grams  English  hay  fed,    .... 

636.09 

45.73 

51.78 

211.56 

311.81 

15.20 

Minus  268.70  grams  feces  excreted. 

256.15 

23.54 

24.23 

78.46 

121.20 

8.68 

English  hay  digested, 

379.94 

22.19 

27.55 

133.10 

190.61 

6.52 

Per  cent,  digested, 

59.73 

48.52 

53.20 

62.91 

61.13 

41.89 

1  One  sheep  only. 


304       MASS.   EXPERIMENT    STATION    BULLETIN    181. 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  ■ —  Continued. 

Series  XXII.,  English  Hay,  Period  13  —  Concluded. 

Sheep  XIII. 


Item. 

S 

03 
P 

< 

c 

■J 
o 

.11 
2; 

1 

700  (minus  1.67  grams  waste)  equals  698.33 

grams  English  hay  fed. 
Minus  281.36  grams  feces  excreted. 

634.57 
266.79 

45.63 
25.43 

51.65 
26.68 

211.06 
80.12 

311.07 
125.87 

15.17 
8.70 

English  hay  digested, 

Per  cent,  digested, 

357.78 
57.96 

20.20 
44.27 

24.97 
48.37 

130.94 
72.04 

185.20 
57.54 

6.47 
42.65 

Average  per  cent,  digested, 

58.85 

46.40 

50.77 

62.48 

60.34 

42.77 

Series  XXII.,  New  York  Alf.\l,fa  (Third  Cutting),  Period  14. 
Sheep  XII. 


700  grams  New  York  alfalfa  (third  cutting) 

fed. 
Minus  269.07  grams  feces  excreted. 

638.75 
257.96 

44.37 
22.13 

99.45 
27.42 

221.65 
114.64 

260.10 
84.59 

13  16 
9.18 

Alfalfa  digested, 

Per  cent,  digested, 

380.79 
59.61 

22.26 
50.15 

72.03 
72.43 

107.01 
48.28 

175.51 
67.48 

3.98 
30.24 

Sheep  XIII. 


700  grams  New  York  alfalfa  (third  cutting) 

fed. 
Minus  277.50  grams  feces  excreted. 

638.75 
265.04 

44.37 
21.89 

99.45 
26.53 

221.65 
121.39 

260.10 
86.32 

13.16 
8.91 

Alfalfa  digested 

Per  cent,  digested, 

373.71 
58.50 

22.50 
50.68 

72.92 
73.32 

100.26 
45.23 

173.78 
66.81 

4.25 
32.29 

Average  per  cent,  digested. 

59.06 

50.42 

72.88 

46.76 

67.15 

31.26 

Series  XXII.,  Rowen,  Period  15. 
Sheep  XII. 


700  grams  rowen  fed. 

Minus  259.10  grams  feces  excreted, 

Rowen  digested 

Per  cent,  digested. 


636.09 

51.65 

82.88 

179.06 

300.80 

249.25 

33.97 

32.83 

57.08 

110.19 

386.84 

17.68 

50.05 

121.98 

190.61 

60.81 

34.23 

60  39 

68.12 

63  37 

21.69. 
15.18 


6.51 
30.01 


Sheep  XIII 

700  grams  rowen  fed. 

Minus  257.74  grams  feces  excreted. 

636.09 
247.04 

51.65 
33.18 

82.88 
32.93 

179.06 
57.17 

300.80 
109.56 

21.69 
14.20 

Rowen  digested,     .... 
Per  cent,  digested. 

389.05 
61.16 

18.47 
35.76 

49.95 
60.27 

121.89 
68.08 

191.24 
63  57 

7.49 
34  53 

Average  per  cent,  digested. 

60.99 

35.00 

60.33 

68.10 

63  47 

32.27 

DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH   SHEEP. 


305 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  —  Continued. 

Series  XXII.,  Sweet  Clover  (Green),  Period  16. 

Sheep  IX. 


Item. 

u 

Q 

■i 
< 

I 

E 

0) 

P  o 
hS  >- 

.11 

1 

400  grams  English  hay  fed,    . 
1,600  grams  sweet  clover  fed, 

359.48 
232.00 

25.92 
10.67 

32.57 
49.79 

109.03 
62.13 

182.04 
101.52 

9.92 
7.89 

Amount  consumed. 

Minus  246.07  grams  feces  excreted 

591.48 
228.30 

36.59 
27.36 

82.36 

28.67 

171.16 
72.71 

283.56 
107.38 

17.81 
9.94 

Amount  digested,  . 
Minus  hay  digested. 

363.18 
208.50 

9.23 
11.66 

53.69 
15.63 

98.45 
68.89 

176.18 
109.22 

7.87 
4.46 

Sweet  clover  digested,    . 

Per  cent,  sweet  clover  digested, 

154.68 
66.67 

- 

38.06 
76.44 

29.56 
47.60 

60.96 
65.96 

3.41 
43.22 

Shee-p  XI. 


Amount  consumed  as  above. 

591.48 

36.59 

82.36 

171.16 

283.56 

17.81 

Minus  231.36  grams  feces  excreted, 

214.52 

24.89 

25.91 

69.78 

102.26 

8.51 

Amount  digested, 

376.96 

11.70 

56.45 

101.38 

181.30 

9.30 

Minus  hay  digested, 

208.50 

11.66 

15.63 

68.89 

109.22 

4.46 

Sweet  clover  digested, 

168.46 

.04 

40.82 

32.49 

72.08 

4.84 

Per  cent,  sweet  clover  digested,     . 

72.61 

.03 

81.98 

52.29 

71.00 

61.34 

Average  per  cent,  sweet  clover  digested, 

69.64 

.03 

79.21 

49.95 

68.48 

52.28 

Series  XXII.,  Sudan  Grass  (Green),  Period  17. 
Sheep  XII. 


400  grams  English  hay  fed 

352.28 

24.69 

30.79 

117.63 

169.27 

9.90 

1,600  grams  Sudan  grass  (green,  first  cutting) 

313.28 

22.49 

44.58 

95.02 

136.43 

14.75 

Amount  consumed 

665.56 

47.18 

75.37 

212.65 

305.70 

24.65 

Minus  235.01  grams  feces  excreted, 

215.74 

16.27 

24.18 

58.53 

109.14 

7.62 

Amount  digested 

449.82 

30.91 

51.19 

154.12 

196.56 

17.03 

Minus  hay  digested 

207.85 

11.36 

15.70 

72.93 

101.56 

4.26 

Sudan  grass  (green,  first  cutting)  digested,  . 

241.97 

19.55 

35.49 

81.19 

95.00 

12.77 

Per  cent.  Sudan  grass  (green,  first  cutting) 
digested. 

77.23 

86.93 

79.61 

85.45 

69.63 

86.57 

306       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 


Table  V.  —  Computation  of  Digestion  Coefficients  —  Concluded. 

Series  XXII.,  Sudan  Grass  (Green),  Period  17  —  Concluded. 

Sheep  XIII. 


Item. 

1 

>> 

U 

P 

< 

1 

Amount  consumed  as  above, 
Minus  253.04  grams  feces  excreted. 

665.56 
235.78 

47.18 
26.83 

75.37 
24.38 

212.65 
65.90 

305.70 
110.13 

24.65 
8.54 

Amount  digested, 

Minus  hay  digested, 

429.78 
207.85 

20.35 
11.36 

50.99 
15.70 

146.75 
72.93 

195.57 
101.56 

16.11 
4.26 

Sudan  grass  (green,  first  cutting)  digested,   . 

Per  cent.  Sudan  grass  (green,  first  cutting) 
digested. 

221.93 
70.84 

8.99 
39.96 

35.29 
79.16 

73.82 
77.69 

94.01 
68.97 

11.85 
80.34 

Average  per  cent.  Sudan  grass  (green, 
first  cutting)  digested. 

74.04 

63.45 

79.38 

81.57 

69.30 

83.46 

Discussion  of  the  Results. 

Having  presented  in  the  foregoing  pages  a  statement  of  the  general 
purpose  of  these  experiments,  an  explanation  of  the  tables,  and  the  data 
of  the  composition  of  the  feeds  and  feces,  as  well  as  the  detailed  data 
of  the  experiments,  including  the  computation  of  the  digestion  coefficients, 
it  is  intended  in  the  pages  which  follow  to  state  briefly  the  general  character 
of  each  feed,  summarize  the  coefficients  secured,  and  draw  such  conclu- 
sions as  the  results  indicate. 

In  noting  the  variations  which  occur  when  the  same  feed  is  fed  to 
different  sheep,  the  fact  must  not  be  lost  sight  of  that  digestibility  is 
made  up  of  a  number  of  processes.  Armsby  states  the  matter  clearly 
when  he  says  "digestibility  in  ruminants  is  a  very  complex  affair, 
depending  on  many  factors;  ...  it  may  be  characterized  as  a  series  of 
fermentations  effected  in  part  by  a  variety  of  organized  ferments,  and 
in  part  by  enzymes  secreted  by  the  digestive  organs  or  contained  in  the 
feed  itself.  Changes  in  the  composition  of  the  contents  of  the  digestive 
tract,  or  in  the  rapidity  with  which  they  move  forward  through  it,  can 
hardly  fail  to  influence  in  a  variety  of  ways  the  course  of  these  fermenta- 
tions, and  it  seems,  on  the  whole,  rather  surprising  that  they  go  forward 
as  rapidly  as  they  do." 


DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH   SHEEP. 


307 


Simimanj  of  Coefficients  of  English  Hay 

—  Basal. 

Lot. 

Series. 

Period. 

Sheep. 

Dry 

Matter. 

Ash. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Nitrogen- 
free 
Extract. 

Fat. 

1 

XIX. 

3 

I. 

59.77 

20.59 

49.08 

64.84 

64.07 

38.42 

1 

XIX. 

3 

II. 

57.65 

23.90 

53.12 

58.93 

62.39 

38.17 

1 

XIX. 

9 

V. 

60.57 

33.50 

53.53 

63.32 

63.29 

57.47 

1 

XIX. 

9 

VI. 

57,53 

32.81 

51.10 

58.66 

60.84 

54.99 

Average, 

58.88 

27.70 

51.71 

61.45 

62.72 

47.26 

2 

XX. 

1 

I. 

64.70 

39.69 

50.86 

70.41 

66.78 

84.67 

2 

XX. 

1 

II. 

63.43 

36.98 

50.38 

68.33 

66.06 

47.96 

2 

XX. 

6 

IV. 

60.08 

42.04 

48.34 

63.10 

62.51 

39.26 

2 

XX. 

10 

VII. 

56.80 

42.70 

52.25 

59.57 

58.27 

43.15 

2 

XX. 

10 

VIII. 

59.70 

44.21 

52.72 

62.44 

61.96 

41.83 

Average, 

60.94 

41.12 

50.91 

64.77 

63.12 

51.39 

3 

XXI. 

2 

VII. 

54.89 

28.25 

42.00 

58.88 

58.62 

42.44 

3 

XXI. 

2 

VIII. 

61.70 

37.65 

45.08 

68.06 

64.39 

44.65 

3 

XXI. 

9 

IX. 

58.21 

40.25 

42.18 

62.65 

60.86 

46.52 

3 

XXI. 

,9 

X. 

56.37 

43.47 

46.81 

59.36 

58.50 

40.87 

3 

XXI. 

9 

XI. 

53.82 

38.14 

40.07 

56.46 

57.13 

39.27 

Average 

57.00 

37.55 

43.23 

61.08 

59.90 

42.71 

4 

XXI. 

13 

XII. 

60.69 

39.10 

54.81 

65.30 

64.70 

53.07 

4 

XXI. 

13 

XIII. 

60.15 

35.89 

54.01    • 

62.63 

64.49 

48.78 

4 

XXI. 

13 

XIV. 

57.64 

35.31 

50.89 

61.07 

62.59 

50.23 

4 

XXII. 

2 

IV. 

61.21 

29.31 

53.63 

67.57 

64.37 

40.96 

4 

XXII. 

2 

VI. 

62.52 

26  61 

47.96 

70.21 

66.75 

40.62 

Average, 

60.44 

31.24 

52.26 

65.36 

64.58 

46.73 

5 

XXII. 

8 

IV. 

61.20 

40.75 

50.30 

67.18 

62.65 

44.67 

5 

XXII. 

8 

VI. 

61.54 

42.15 

51.37 

69.31 

64.31 

45.56 

5 

XXII. 

13 

XII. 

59.73 

48.52 

53.20 

62.91 

61.13 

41.89 

5 

XXII. 

13 

XIII. 

57.96 

44.27 

48.37 

72.04 

57.54 

42.65 

Average, 

60.11 

43.92 

50.81 

67.86 

61.41 

43.69 

Grand  average 

59.47 

36.31 

49.78 

64.10 

62.35 

46.34 

308       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 

Five  distinct  lots  of  hay  were  used  in  these  experiments.  The  hay  was 
cut  when  in  bloom  from  an  old  mowing,  and  was  composed  largely  of 
Kentucky  blue  grass  {Poa  pratensis)  and  sweet  vernal  grass  (Anthoxan- 
thum  odoratum)  with  an  admixture  of  more  or  less  clover.  The  results, 
on  the  whole,  are  reasonably  uniform,  although  one  notes  occasional 
variations,  particularly  in  the  fiber  and  also  in  the  protein,  due  evidently 
to  the  individuality  and  perhaps  to  particular  condition  of  the  sheep. 

The  last  two  lots  were  evidently  of  somewhat  better  quality,  or  per- 
haps cut  a  little  earlier  than  the  first  two,  for  they  showed  a  somewhat 
superior  digestibility.  All  five  lots  were  more  fully  digested  than  is 
timothy  hay.  Note  that  the  fiber  in  the  hay  has  a  digestibility  slightly 
above  the  extract  matter.    This  is  characteristic  of  many  coarse  feeds. 


Summary  of  Coefficients  of  English  Hay  and  Gluten  Feed 

—  Basal. 

Lot. 

Series. 

Period. 

Sheep. 

Dry 

Matter. 

Ash. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Nitrogen- 
free 
Extract. 

Hay. 

Gluten 
Feed. 

Fat. 

1 

1 

XIX. 

2 

V. 

66.13 

34.59 

67.91 

64.67 

69.82 

56.13 

1 

1 

XIX. 

2 

VI. 

66.61 

27.03 

68.79 

66.60 

70.21 

56.53 

1 

2 

XIX. 

15 

V. 

66.70 

42.45 

64.22 

66.36 

70.29 

54.23 

1 

2 

XIX. 

15 

VI. 

66.22 

39.97 

59.69 

60.35 

66.48 

48.23 

2 

2 

XX. 

5 

I. 

70.34 

41.09 

66.45 

74.12 

72.80 

60.56 

2 

2 

XX. 

5 

II. 

66.69 

28.84 

61.42 

69.60 

70.70 

58.33 

2 

2 

XX. 

14 

IV. 

60.31 

27.12 

63.45 

60.34 

63.53 

50.95 

2 

2 

XX. 

14 

V. 

63.23 

29.01 

64.01 

65.99 

66.05 

46.73 

2 

2 

XX. 

14 

VI. 

63.74 

31.94 

64.71 

65.92 

66.31 

51.93 

3 

3 

XXI. 

1 

IV. 

64.97 

31.78 

68.38 

65.52 

68.73 

46.03 

3 

3 

XXI. 

•  1 

V. 

66.92 

23.83 

68.53 

68.50 

71.74 

47.76 

3 

3 

XXI. 

1 

VI. 

68.81 

32.51 

70.34 

71.07 

72.53 

49.21 

4 

3 

XXI. 

11 

V. 

70.49 

40.50 

70.34 

73.81 

74.35 

48.94 

4 

3 

XXI. 

11 

VI. 

71.17 

34.90 

71.19 

75.67 

75.24 

50.94 

Average, 

66.59 

33.25 

66.39 

67.75 

69.91 

51.89 

In  many  cases  it  was  thought  wise  to  use  a  basal  ration  composed  of 
English  hay  and  gluten  feed  in  order  to  secure  a  combination  better 
balanced  as  regards  protein  and  carbohydrates  than  is  hay.  Gluten  feed 
was  selected  to  be  used  with  the  hay  because  it  contained  a  moderate 
amount  of  protein  and  is  usually  quite  fully  digested.  In  Series  XIX.  a 
combination  of  650  grams  of  hay  and  125  grams  of  gluten  feed  mas  used, 
and  in  the  other  cases  550  grams  of  hay  and  150  grams  of  gluten 
feed. 


DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH   SHEEP. 


309 


The  results  of  Period  14,  Series  XX.,  are  rather  surprising,  and  in  a 
way  hardly  to  be  explained,  being  noticeably  below  Series  XXI.,  Periods 
1  and  11,  which  are  reasonably  uniform.  They  will  be  discussed  further 
in  considering  the  digestibility  of  gluten  feed.  Series  XIX.,  Period  15, 
has  more  hay  in  proportion  to  gluten  feed,  and  the  coefficients  are  some- 
what below  the  other  series,  with  the  exceptions  mentioned. 


Summary  of  Coeffi,cients  of  English  Hay,  Potato  Starch  and  Diamond  Gluten 

Meal  —  Basal. 


Lot. 

Series. 

Period. 

Sheep. 

Dry 

Matter. 

Ash. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Nitrogen- 
free 
Extract. 

Hay. 

Starch 

and 
Gluten. 

Fat. 

1 

XIX. 

10 

III. 

73.45 

33.70 

73.48 

59.62 

80.71 

34.29 

1 

XIX. 

10 

IV. 

70.47 

13.22 

71.02 

55.41 

78.91 

32.67 

1 

XIX. 

11 

IV. 

72.17 

33.93 

75.02 

60.73 

78.39 

47.07 

2 

XXI. 

5 

IV. 

72.77 

19.38 

71.12 

64.26 

80.63 

32.29 

2 

XXI. 

5 

V. 

77.28 

9.41 

75.33 

74.73 

84.15 

41.00 

2 

1 

XXI. 

5 

VI. 

73.49 

13.30 

71.93 

66.46 

81.24 

35.66 

Average 

73.27 

20.16 

72.98 

63.54 

80.67 

37.16 

In  order  to  study  the  digestibility  of  fiber  in  distillers'  grains  and  corn 
bran,  a  basal  ration  composed  of  a  limited  amount  of  hay  plus  potato 
st':irch  and  Diamond  gluten  meal  was  used.  This  ration  naturally  con- 
tained but  little  fiber,  and  would  permit  the  intestinal  juices  and  ferments 
to  exert  their  maximum  effect  upon  the  fiber  of  the  two  by-products. 

Sheep  IV.  in  Series  XIX.  received  100  grams  more  hay  and  25  grams 
more  gluten  meal  daily  in  the  combination  than  did  the  other  three  sheep. 
The  coefficients  of  this  basal  ration  are  fairly  uniform,  excepting  that 
Sheep  V.  appeared  to  have  digested  noticeably  more  of  the  ration  than 
did  the  other  sheep. 


310       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 


Summary  of  Coefficients  of  Gluten  Feed  {Present  Experiments). 

Series. 

Period. 

Sheep. 

Brand. 

Dry 
Matter. 

Ash. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Nitrogen- 
free 

Extract. 

Fat. 

XIX. 

2 

V. 

- 

91.80 

167.00 

87.50 

99.00 

94.70 

72.50 

XIX. 

2 

VI. 

- 

94.70 

- 

89.50 

126.00 

96.30 

73.60 

XIX. 

14 

V. 

- 

112.09 

337.98 

84.78 

208.85 

110.89 

59.91 

XIX. 

14 

VI. 

- 

94.54 

258.91 

89.69 

116.36 

94.63 

53.50 

XIX. 

15 

V. 

Clinton 

106.57 

163.22 

82.62 

173.28 

108.91 

50.00 

XIX. 

15 

VI. 

Clinton 

78.90 

129.89 

71.28 

47.41 

87.34 

29.55 

XX. 

5 

I. 

Clinton 

93.42 

75,66 

84.70 

145.65 

94.25 

87.60 

XX. 

5 

II. 

Clinton 

76.50 

- 

73.73 

77.96 

85.50 

80.45 

XX. 

14 

IV. 

Clinton 

50.38 

- 

76.15 

- 

58.65 

63.55 

XX. 

14 

V. 

Clinton 

64.07 

-■ 

77.25 

51.82 

69.51 

50.32 

XX. 

14 

VI. 

Clinton 

66.47 

- 

78.61 

50.80 

70.63 

66.01 

XXI. 

1 

IV. 

Buffalo 

93.87 

- 

92.96 

136.00 

95.88 

63.27 

XXI. 

1 

V. 

Buffalo 

102.79 

- 

93.16 

185.00 

108.12 

74.69 

XXI. 

1 

VI. 

Buffalo 

111.63 

- 

96.82 

228.00 

111.46 

84,49 

XXI. 

11 

V. 

Buffalo 

112.30 

73.00 

93.20 

231.00 

105.00 

38.00 

XXI. 

11 

VI. 

Buffalo 

115.40 

15.00 

95.10 

259.00 

108.50 

51.00 

Average,         ..... 

91.59 

- 

85.44 

142.41 

93.77 

64.41 

The  gluten  feed  represented  in  these  trials  comprised  three  different 
lots  of  the  same  general  type  of  chemical  composition.  It  contained 
approximately  9  per  cent,  of  water;  and  in  dry  matter  the  ash  varied  from 
.95  to  3.49  per  cent.,  the  protein  from  25.47  to  28.29  per  cent.,  the  fiber 
from  7.30  to  8.70  per  cent.,  the  extract  matter  from  56.86  to  59.70  per 
cent.,  and  the  fat  from  1.56  to  4.94  per  cent.  In  general  appearance  the 
three  samples  resembled  each  other  closely.  The  variations  in  percentage 
of  ash  and  fat  indicated  some  little  difference  in  the  manufacturing  process, 
but  not  sufficient  to  warrant  any  noticeable  variations  in  the  digestibility 
of  the  several  lots.  In  fact,  the  gluten  feed  used  in  Series  XIX.,  Periods 
2  and  14,  and  the  same  series,  Period  15,  were  two  different  lots,  and  yet 
they  resemble  each  other  closely  in  digestibility. 

Here  follow  the  results  of  a  number  of  early  experiments.  The  process 
of  manufacture  was  somewhat  different,  more  of  the  germ  being  retained 
resulting  in  a  higher  fat  percentage.  The  ash  also  was  not  much  over 
1  per  cent,  because  the  evaporated  steep  water  was  not  added.  Eather 
wide  variations  are  noted  as  in  the  later  experiments. 


DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH   SHEEP. 


311 


Sununary  of  Earlier  Work  with  Gluten  Feed. 
Digestion  Coefficients. 


Year. 

Series. 

Period. 

Sheep. 

Dry 

Matter. 

Ash. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Nitrogen- 
free 
Extract. 

Fat. 

1893 

- 

2 

II. 

75.53 

- 

85.97 

39.92 

78.44 

82.25 

1893 

- 

2 

IV. 

80.44 

- 

83.94 

46.28 

84.37 

80.58 

1894 

- 

5 

III. 

89.35 

- 

88.69 

94.69 

88.93 

92.74 

1894 

- 

5 

IV. 

91.11 

- 

88.88 

104.56 

89.76 

95.61 

1896 

- 

- 

- 

87.00 

- 

86.00 

77.00 

90.00 

81.00 

1906 

- 

8 

IV. 

93.78 

78.07 

89.26 

123.46 

93.42 

75.70 

1906 

- 

8 

V. 

97.83 

98.67 

92.91 

128.92 

97.03 

79.68 

1909 

XI. 

7 

IV. 

92.25 

85.05 

90.02 

107.23 

92.30 

76.29 

1909 

XI. 

7 

V. 

99.24 

93.69 

92.22 

153.69 

97.98 

77.29 

1909 

XII. 

4 

IV. 

94.58 

- 

91.22 

127.83 

96.09 

77.09 

1909 

XII. 

4 

V. 

95.18 

- 

89.65 

146.29 

97.60 

57.82 

1909 

XII. 

14 

II. 

75.30 

- 

68.83 

63.62 

83.32 

67.06 

.     1909 

XIV. 

3 

I. 

99.18 

77.54 

87.31 

134.91 

103.30 

97.79 

1909 

XIV. 

3 

II. 

90.98 

34.40 

83.32 

119.00 

99.04 

81.26 

1909 

XIV. 

5 

III. 

85.81 

51.15 

81.84 

81.74 

94.04 

79.46 

1909 

XIV. 

5 

IV. 

101.55 

64.83 

88.58 

147.10 

108.24 

84.21 

Average  Results. 


Present  experiments, 
EarUer  experiments, 


91.59 
90.57 


85.44 
86.79 


142.41 
106.01 


93.77 
93.36 


64.41 
80.36 


Averages  are  rot  particularly  satisfactory,  especially  when  the  figures 
from  which  they  are  made  up  vary  widely  among  themselves.  The  fore- 
going averages  show,  however,  the  gluten  feed  to  have  a  high  digestibility. 

A  study  of  the  numerous  results  brings  out  at  least  two  striking  facts. 
In  the  first  place,  in  some  experiments  the  coefficients  are  very  much 
higher  than  in  others.  Thus,  Series  XX.,  Period  14,  gave  results  very 
noticeably  below  the  others. 

It  is  the  belief  of  the  writer,  however,  that  at  least  a  part  of  the  varia- 
tion is  due  to  the  lessened  activity  of  the  digestive  processes,  ever  though 
such  a  condition  may  not  be  indicated  by  any  outward  signs.  The 
changing  from  one  ration  to  another  may  also  change  the  mtestinal  flora. 

In  the  second  place,  it  is  observed  that  in  a  number  of  instances  the 
gluten  feed  appears  to  be  over  100  per  cent,  digestible.  It  seems  reason- 
able to  assume  that  this  is  due  to  its  favorable  effect  in  increasing  the 


312       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 


digestibility  of  the  hay;  this  condition  was  particularly  pronounced  in 
case  of  the  fiber  and  to  a  lesser  extent  in  the  extract  matter,  and  is  in 
accord  with  the  accepted  teaching  of  the  favorable  influence  of  a  protein 
concentrate  on  the  fiber  and  extract  matter  of  a  basal  ration  ha\ang  a 
wide  nutritive  ratio. 

The  digestibility  of  the  protein  varied  in  proportion  to  the  digestibility 
of  the  extract  matter,  and  is  shown  to  be  quite  well  utilized.  The  fat 
show^ed  wide  variations,  due  in  part  to  the  small  amount  present,  and  in 
part  to  other  causes.  The  ash  content  of  gluten  feed  is  not  large,  and  in 
most  cases  more  ash  was  excreted  from  the  total  ration  than  was  con- 
tained in  the  gluten  feed  fed,  so  that  coefficients  for  this  ingredient  cannot 
be  deduced. 

Average  Coefficients  for  All  Results. 

Different  lots, 7 

Number  of  single  trials,        .........  32 

Dry  matter 91.08 

Ash, 

Protein 86. 12 

Fiber 124.21 

Nitrogen-free  extract,  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .93.57 

Fat 72.39 


The  average  results  for  all  samples  indicate  very  clearly  that  gluten 
feed  is  a  highly  digestible  nitrogenous  concentrate,  and  that  in  all  prob- 
ability it  exerts  a  favorable  influence  upon  the  digestibility  of  a  basal 
ration  having  a  wide  nutritive  ratio. 

Summanj  of  Coefficients  for  Diamond  Gluten  Meal. 


Series. 

Period. 

Sheep. 

Dry 

Matter. 

Ash. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Nitrogen- 
free 
Extract. 

Fat. 

XIX 

XIX 

XIX 

XXI 

XXI 

XXI 

10 
10 
11 
5 
5 
5 

IV. 
III.  I 
IV. 
IV. 
V.i 
VI. 

83 
68 
87 
86 
109 
90 

143 
127 

83.8 
80.0 
86.4 
84.8 
91.2 
86.0 

100 
100 
100 

90.5 
79.0 
91.4 
93.3 
120.1 
97.2 

47.3 

Average,  I 

Average  of  previous  results  (8), 

86 
87 

- 

85.0 
88.0 

100 

93.0 
88.0 

93.0 

«  Results  from  Sheep  III.  and  V.  omitted  from  average. 


A  combination  of  300  to  400  grams  of  hay,  125  grams'of  potato  starch, 
and  100  to  125  grams  of  Diamond  gluten  meal  were  fed  as  a  basal  ration 
in  order  to  study  the  digestibility  of  distillers'  dried   grains  and  corn 


DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH    SHEEP. 


313 


bran.  It  seemed  worth  while  in  this  connection  to  get  at  the  digestibility 
of  the  Diamond  gUiten  meal.  In  order  to  accomplish  this  the  digestion 
coefficients  found  for  the  hay  were  applied  to  the  hay  consumed,  and  to 
the  resulting  product  was  added  the  amount  of  starch  consumed,  which 
was  assumed  to  be  entirely  digested.  The  sum  of  the  hay  and  starch 
digested  was  taken  from  the  total  amount  digested,  and  the  remainder 
represented  the  gluten  meal  digested.  The  coefficients  used  for  the  hay 
in  case  of  Series  XIX.  represented  an  average  of  those  secured  by  using 
the  results  from  Sheep  I.,  II.,  V.  and  VI.,  all  of  which  agreed  closely. 
Those  used  in  Series  XXI.  were  the  average  of  those  for  Sheep  VII.,  VIII., 
IX.,  X.  and  XI.,  as  IV.,  V.  and  VI.  had  not  been  used  in  getting  the 
digestibility  of  this  lot  of  ha5^  The  coefficients  for  the  hay  were  as 
follows :  — 


Series. 

Dry 
Matter. 

Ash. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Nitrogen- 
free 
Extract. 

Fat. 

XIX 

XXI., 

59 
57 

2S 
37 

52 
43 

62 
61 

62 
60 

47 
45 

The  nutritive  ratio  of  the  basal  ration  in  Series  XIX.  averaged  1:6.5 
and  in  Series  XXI.,  1:6.8. 

In  passing,  attention  is  called  to  the  fact  that  the  ash,  fiber  and  fat 
content  of  gluten  meal  are  quite  low,  showing  less  than  2  per  cent,  of 
each  on  a  dry-matter  basis,  and  the  coefficients  secured  were,  as  might 
be  expected,  of  uncertain  value,  although  it  is  reasonable  to  assume  that 
these  several  constituents  were  quite  fully  digested. 

The  content  of  protein  and  extract  matter,  on  the  other  hand,  on  the 
basis  of  dry  matter,  was  45  and  50  per  cent.,  respectively,  showing  this 
feedstuff  to  be  made  of  these  two  food  groups  in  nearly  equal  proportions. 

A  study  of  the  coefficients  secured  shows  some  "uade  variations.  Sheep 
III.,  Series  XIX.,  for  some  reason  gave  quite  low  results,  and  in  Series 
XXL,  Sheep  V  gave  results  considerably  above  the  others.  In  making 
the  average,  therefore,  it  seemed  "wise  to  omit  the  coefficients  obtained 
with  these  two  sheep.  The  results  show  the  gluten  meal  to  have  a  high 
digestibility;  in  fact,  it  is  believed  that  if  a  method  sufficiently  accurate 
were  available  it  could  be  shown  that  the  meal  was  practically  all  utilized. 

The  coefficients  given  for  previous  results  represent  eight  single  trials 
with  four  different  lots,  and  were  secured  a  number  of  years  ago  with 
gluten  meal  made  by  a  little  different  process  and  averaging  40  per  cent, 
protein  and  54  per  cent,  extract  matter  in  dry  matter.  The  latter  co- 
efficients are  ia  substantial  accord  with  those  recently  secured. 


314       MASS.   EXPERIMENT    STATION    BULLETIN    181. 


Summary  of  Coefficients  showing  Effect  of  High-grade  Wheat  Gluten  Flour 
upon  Digestibility  of  Hay. 


i 

o 
Ph 

0. 
o 

Dry 

Matter. 

Ash. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Extract 
Matter. 

Fat. 

.i 

1 

3 

.a 
1 

3 
O 

1 

3 
O 

1 

.a 
1 

3 
O 

.a 

1 

3 
O 

1 

3 

o 

XX. 
XX. 

10  and  12, 
10  and  12, 

VII. 
VIII. 

59  57 

60  60 

48 
46 

43 

44 

43 
40 

52 
53 

62       60 
64       62 

61 
62 

58 
62 

46 
48 

43 
42 

Average, 

;    59 

58 

47 

43 

41 

52 

63       61 

62 

60 

47 

42 

The  object  of  this  trial  was  to  observe  the  effect  of  a  high-grade  wheat 
gluten  flour,  composed  largely  of  protein,  upon  the  digestibility  of  the 
hay.  In  the  hay  experiment  600  grams  were  fed  to  each  of  two  sheep, 
and  in  the  experiment  immediately  following  40  grams  of  the  gluten  were 
added  to  the  hay. 

The  hay  contained  in  dry  matter  6.66  per  cent,  ash,  8.36  protein, 
32.08  fiber,  50.40  extract  matter  and  2.50  fat,  and  had  a  nutritive  ratio 
of  1:12.  The  wheat  gluten  contained  in  dry  matter  .86  per  cent,  ash, 
92.41  protein,  .11  fiber,  6.23  extract  matter  and  .39  fat,  being  nearly  pure 
gluten  meal,  with  traces  of  ash,  fiber  and  fat,  and  a  small  amount  of  ex- 
tract matter.  The  nutritive  ratio  of  the  hay-gluten  mixture  was  1:6. 
A  study  of  the  comparative  coefficients  of  the  hay  when  fed  with  and  with- 
out the  gluten  —  assuming  the  gluten  to  have  been  entirely  digested  — • 
indicates  that  the  latter  improved  the  digestibility  of  the  hay  slightly, 
particularly  the  fiber,  extract  matter  and  fat.  The  protein,  on  the  other 
hand,  showed  an  apparent  lessened  digestibility,  due  perhaps  to  the  fact 
that  the  protein  of  the  gluten  was  not  completely  assimilated. 

Applying  the  coefficients  secured  for  the  hay  when  fed  by  itself  to  the 
same  hay  fed  in  combination  with  wheat  gluten,  and  subtracting  the  result 
from  the  total  amount  of  hay  plus  gluten  digested,  we  find  that  in  case 
of  one  sheep  47.48  grams,  and  in  case  of  the  other,  33.95  grams,  were 
digested  against  36.36  grams  fed.  This  indicates  that  in  one  case  at 
least  the  gluten  was  not  only  fully  digested  but  improved  somewhat  the 
digestibility  of  the  hay. 


DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH   SHEEP. 


315 


Summary  of  Coefficients  showing  Effect  of  High-grade  Wheat  Gluten  Flour 
wpon  Digestibility  of  Hay  —  Continued. 


o 

Dry 

Matter. 

Ash. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Extract 

Matter. 

Fat. 

1 

^ 
1 

■3 
1 

1 

■a 
1 

0 

1 

-a 
■♦J 

3 
0 

-a 

1 

0 

1 

"3 
1 

1 

XXI. 

41 

VII. 

55 

55 

36 

28 

45 

42 

58 

59 

58 

59 

44 

42 

1  In  case  of  hay  alone,  period  2. 

This  experiment  was  with  a  new  lot  of  hay,  testing  in  dry  matter  6.59 
per  cent,  ash,  7.59  per  cent,  protein,  32.67  per  cent,  fiber,  50.29  per  cent, 
extract  matter  and  2.86  per  cent,  fat,  and  having  a  nutritive  .ratio  of 
about  1:17,  being  very  wide.  The  wheat  gluten  was  the  same  as  the  lot 
previously  fed,  and  the  combination  of  700  grams  hay  and  40  grams 
wheat  gluten  had  a  nutritive  ratio  of  1:5.7.  In  other  words,  the  addition 
of  40  grams  of  gluten  to  700  grams  of  hay  produced  a  much  narrower 
ration  than  if  the  hay  had  been  fed  by  itself.  A  study  of  the  coefficients 
shows  no  particular  improvement  in  the  digestibility  of  the  hay  as  a 
result  of  adding  the  gluten,  although  such  an  improvement  was  antici- 
pated. 

Applying  the  coefficients  secured  for  the  hay  when  fed  by  itself  to  the 
same  hay  fed  in  combination  with  wheat  gluten,  and  subtracting  the 
result  from  the  total  amount  of  hay  plus  gluten  digested,  we  have  38.58 
grams  of  gluten  digested  as  against  37.18  grams  fed,  showing  the  gluten 
to  have  been  completely  digested. 


Summary  of  Coefficients  showing  Effect  of  High-grade  Wheat  Gluten  Flour 
upon  Digestibility  of  Hay  —  Concluded. 


13 

.2 
o 

CD 

Dry 

Matter. 

Ash. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Extract 
Matter. 

Fat. 

1 

M 
1 

3 
o 
-a 

1 

o 

M 
1 

O 

1 

0 

.a 
1 

o 

.a 

1 

.a 

3 
o 

XXI. 
XXI. 

101 
10  ^ 

IV. 
VI. 

61 
61 

57 
57 

46 
44 

37 
37 

47 
46 

43 
43 

66 
67 

61 
61 

64 
63 

60 
60 

38 
39 

45 
45 

Average, 

Average  of  all  trials  (5), 

61  1    57 
58       57 

45 
43 

37 
36 

46 
44 

43 

46 

66 
62 

61 

61 

63 
61 

60 
60 

38 
43 

45 
43 

I   In  case  of  hay  alone,  periods  2  and  9. 


316       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 

The  hay  was  the  same  as  fed  in  the  former  trial;  the  gluten  was  a  new 
lot,  but  did  not  vary  in  composition  much  from  the  previous  sample  used. 

Unfortunately,  Sheep  IV,  and  VI.  were  not  used  in  testing  the  digesti- 
bility of  the  hay,  and  the  coefficients  represent  the  average  obtained  by 
using  Sheep  VII.,  VIII.,  IX.,  X.  and  XI.  It  is  evident  in  this  trial  that 
the  gluten  did  improve  the  digestibility  of  the  hay  somewhat,  particularly 
the  fiber  and  extract  matter. 

Experiments  by  numerous  investigators  ^  have  shown  that  when  a 
ration  containing  considerable  starch,  and  having  a  nutritive  ratio  of 
1 :12  or  more,  is  fed  to  ruminants  more  or  less  of  the  starch  is  found  in  the 
feces,  and  if  to  this  ration  a  protein  concentrate  is  added  the  starch  dis- 
appears, and  the  digestion  coefficients,  not  only  of  the  extract  matter 
but  also  of  the  fiber,  are  improved.  In  our  own  case  the  addition  of  a 
small  amount  of  a  very  rich  protein  food  to  hay  improved  the  digestibility 
of  the  latter,  but  not  in  as  marked  a  way  as  was  expected. 


Suvimary  of  Coefficients  of  Corn  Bran. 


Series. 

Period. 

Sheep. 

Dry 

Matter. 

Ash. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Nitrogen- 
free 
Extract. 

Fat. 

XIX 

XIX 

XXI 

XXI 

XXI 

13 
13 

7 
7 
7 

I. 

II. 
IV. 

V. 
VI. 

90.08 
77.09 
78.23 
81.89 
75.66 

210.29 
129.04 

49.64 
26.03 
58.78 
22.56 
61.83 

99.91 
66.90 
67.49 
96.10 
49.20 

90.24 
82.70 
82.27 
86.33 
84.21 

74.88 
45.52 
63.57 
65.16 
78.51 

Average 

Average  of  previous  trials  (2), 
Average  of  all  previous  trials  (6), 

80.59 

71 

71 

- 

43,77 

55 

60 

75.92 

65 

71 

85.15 

75 

80 

65.53 

83 

80 

The  com  bran  represents  the  hull  or  skin  of  the  kernel,  together  with 
pieces  of  broken  germ  and  more  or  less  of  the  starchy  i^ortion  which  it 
is  not  possible  to  separate  by  mechanical  means.  It  is  often  found  in 
the  markets  of  Massachusetts,  and  has  been  offered  at  a  very  reasonable 
price.  In  dry  matter  it  contained  1.08  per  cent,  ash,  6.87  per  cent,  protein, 
13.86  per  cent,  fiber,  76.33  per  cent,  extract  matter  and  1.86  per  cent, 
fat.  While  low  in  ash  and  protein,  its  fiber  content  is  not  excessive,  and 
it  is  quite  rich  in  extract  matter. 

The  hay-gluten  meal-starch  combination  served  as  the  basal  ration. 
For  some  reason  Sheep  I.,  as  indicated  by  the  digestion  coefficients,  ap- 
peared to  have  utilized  the  bran  quite  fully.  The  results  secured  with 
the  other  sheep  were  as  uniform  as  was  to  be  expected,  although  Shee]) 
II.  and  V.  apparently  made  less  use  of  the  protein,  while  the  latter  sheep 
gave  a  high  coefficient  for  the  fiber. 


1  See  brief  r6sum6  in  Die  Ernahrung  d.  landw.  Natzthiere,  by  Kellner,  sixth  ed.,  pp.  53,  54. 


DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   "WITH   SHEEP. 


317 


The  results  are  higher  than  those  formerly  secured  by  us,  where  the 
corn  bran  was  fed  together  with  hay,  excepting  those  for  protein  and  fat. 
It  is  evident  that  the  fiber  is  quite  well  digested,  much  more  so  than  that 
contained  in  wheat  and  oats.  Comparing  the  corn  bran  with  corn  meal 
on  the  basis  of  net  energy  values  it  is  found  that  if  corn  meal  is  placed 
at  100  corn  bran  equals  82. 


Summary  of  Coefficients  of  Distillers'  Grains. 


Sekies. 

Period. 

Sheep. 

Dry 
Matter. 

Ash. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Nitrogen- 
free 
Extract. 

Fat. 

XIX 

XXI.,    . 

XXI 

XXI 

12 
6 
6 
6 

IV. 

IV. 

V. 

VI. 

65.79 
64.88 
67.54 
67.94 

64.51 
21.21 
23.21 

79.47 
77.26 
74.23 
77.24 

16.21 
43.89 
62.67 
54.98 

70.55 
63.17 
66.63 
69.16 

93.22 
81.99 
82.48 
77.10 

Average, 

Average  of  all  pre^-ious  trials  for 

corn  grains  (17). 
Average  of  all  previous  trials  for 

rye  grains  (2). 

66.54 

79 

58 

36.31 

77.05 

73 

59 

44.44 
95 

67.38 

81 

67 

83.70 
95 

84 

The  object  of  this  experiment  was  to  study  particularly  the  digestibility 
of  the  fiber.  For  this  purpose  the  grains  were  added  to  the  hay-Diamond- 
gluten-meal-starch  basal  ration,  which  was  quite  low  in  that  ingredient. 

Distillers'  grains  represent  the  residues  from  the  manufacture  of  dis- 
tilled spirits.  Those  containing  a  high  protein  percentage  are  derived 
largely  from  corn.  On  the  basis  of  10  per  cent,  water  the  two  samples 
contained  26.51  and  23.76  per  cent,  of  protein,  and  may  be  considered  of 
fair  quality.  The  best  grades  usually  contain  30  or  more  per  cent,  of 
protein.  On  the  dry  matter  basis  the  average  of  the  two  samples  con- 
tained 2.07  per  cent,  ash,  27.92  per  cent,  protein,  13.67  per  cent,  fiber, 
46.69  per  cent,  extract  matter  and  9.65  per  cent.  fat. 

In  the  present  experiments  variations  are  observed  in  the  percentages 
of  the  several  ingredients  digested.  It  is  rather  surprising  that  such 
differences  occur  in  the  percentages  of  fiber  digested.  It  is  evident,  in 
spite  of  the  low  fiber  content  of  the  basal  ration,  that  the  sheep  did  not 
utilize  the  fiber  from  the  distillers'  grains  very  well,  which  indicates  that 
other  grains  than  corn  were  used  in  the  mash.  Previous  trials  with  corn 
grains  showed  higher  coefficients  for  the  total  dry  matter  and  for  the 
extract  matter  and  fat  (see  above),  while  the  coefficients  for  the  fiber 
were  believed  to  have  been  too  high.  It  seems  probable  that  in  the 
former  trials,  where  the  distillers'  grains  were  fed  with  hay,  the  addition 
of  the  former  increased  the  digestibility  of  the  hay  fiber.  It  is  believed 
that  the  extent  of  the  digestibility  of  distillers'  grains  will  depend  upon 


318       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 

the  kind  of  grains  composing  the  mash.  If  much  rye,  barley  and  wheat 
are  used  the  coefficients,  especially  those  for  fiber,  will  be  lower  than 
when  corn  is  the  predominating  grain. 


Sianmary  of  Coefficients  of  Feterita. 


Series. 

Period. 

Sheep. 

Dry 
Matter. 

Ash. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Nitrogen- 
free 
Extract. 

Fat. 

XXl.,    . 

12 

V. 

74.36 

- 

54.79 

- 

87.58 

60.70 

XXI 

12 

VI. 

74.65 

- 

46.55 

- 

87.94 

56.69 

Average, 

74.51 

- 

50.67 

- 

87.58 

60.70 

Texas  Station,  i   . 

88.99 

- 

90.03 

50.00 

96.60 

74.52 

Corn  for  comparison  (12),  . 

90 

- 

74 

57 

94 

93 

Feterita,  or  Sudan  durra,  is  one  of  the  grain  sorghums,  which  include 
also  Kafir,  milo,  durra  and  kaoliang.  According  to  Morrison  "it  has 
slender  stems  carrying  more  leaves  than  milo  but  less  than  kafir,  and 
erect  heads  bearing  flattened  seeds.  Over  much  of  the  drier  western 
portion  of  the  gram  sorghum  belt  these  crops  are  more  sure,  and  even 
on  good  soil  return  larger  yields  than  corn."  It  has  been  stated  that 
the  average  crop  is  25  bushels  per  acre,  with  a  maximum  of  80  bushels 
(56  pounds)  for  feterita.  The  sample  tested  by  us  came  from  a  carload 
received  by  an  eastern  grain  dealer,  and  contained  10.41  per  cent,  water. 
Its  dry  matter  consisted  of  1.80  per  cent,  ash,  13.23  per  cent,  protein, 
1.40  per  cent,  fiber,  80.23  per  cent,  extract  matter  and  3.34  per  cent, 
fat.  In  chemical  composition  it  resembles  corn,  being  a  little  higher  in 
protein  and  lower  in  fat.  Hay  and  gluten  feed  served  as  a  basal  ration, 
and  the  feterita  constituted  30  per  cent,  of  the  total  ration.  The  results 
of  the  trial  agree  closely.  It  is  surprising,  however,  that  in  total  dry 
matter  the  coefficients  fall  so  much  below  corn.  Neither  the  protein  nor 
the  fat  appear  to  be  as  well  digested;  the  extract  matter,  however,  ap- 
proaches in  digestibility  that  contained  in  corn.  Corn  contains  sub- 
stantially 85.7  pounds  of  digestible  organic  nutrients  in  100,  and  on  the 
basis  of  our  results  feterita  contains  71.06  pounds,  thus  indicating  that 
the  latter  has  only  83  per  cent,  of  the  nutritive  value  of  corn.  There 
are  no  data  from  which  to  compute  its  net  energy  value.  It  is  doubtful, 
however,  if  such  data  would  show  any  wide  variations  from  that  secured 
as  a  result  of  digestion  data.  Further  experiments  with  the  feterita 
should  be  made,  however,  before  drawing  positive  conclusions. ^ 

1  See  note  2. 

*  Since  the  above  was  written,  Fraps  of  the  Texas  Station,  Bui.  No.  203,  reports  results  with 
this  grain  showing  higher  digestion  coefficients  than  those  secured  by  ourselves.  These  co- 
efficients are  inserted  above,  together  with  our  own. 


DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH    SHEEP. 


319 


Summary  of  Coefficients  of  Alfalfa. 

Series. 

Period. 

Sheep. 

Dry 

Matter. 

Ash. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Nitrogen- 
free 
Extract. 

Fat. 

XXII 

12 

IV. 

58.10 

41.50 

73.16 

46.92 

66.48 

16.66 

XXII 

12 

VI. 

54.75 

28.10 

68.19 

45.15 

63.70 

15.27 

XXII.,  . 

14 

XII. 

59.61 

50.15 

72.43 

48.28 

67.48 

30.24 

XXII.,  . 

14 

XIIJ. 

58.50 

50.68 

73.32 

45.23 

66.81 

32.29 

Average, 

.... 

57.74 

42.61 

71.78 

46.40 

66.12 

23.62 

Average  all  previous  trials  third 

cutting  (6). 
Average  all  previous  trials  (109),  . 

58 
60 

44 
50 

70 
71 

40 
43 

70 
72 

42 
38 

The  alfalfa  was  quite  free  from  foreign  material.  It  represented  the 
third  cutting,  and  was  grown  in  the  State  of  New  York.  It  averaged  in 
drj'-  matter  6.49  per  cent,  ash,  15.34  per  cent,  crude  protein,  35.06  per 
cent,  fiber,  41.13  per  cent,  extract  matter  and  1.98  per  cent,  crude  fat. 
The  results  are  satisfactory  and  are  quite  uniform  with  those  previously 
secured.  The  fiber  in  alfalfa  hay  has  relatively  a  low,  and  the  protein  a 
high,  digestibility. 

Roots  and  Vegetables. 

It  is  generally  assumed  that  roots  and  vegetables  are  quite  fully  di- 
gested by  animals.  Relatively  few  digestion  trials  have  been  made  to 
determine  the  rate  of  digestibility  and  to  note  the  effect,  if  any,  of  such 
materials  upon  the  digestibility  of  feeds  with  which  they  are  fed. 


(a)  Cabbages. 

The  whole  cabbage,  the  head  minus  the  outside  leaves,  and  the  leaves 
themselves  were  analyzed  and  digestion  experiments  carried  out.  The 
whole  cabbage  contained  88.27  per  cent,  water,  and  its  dry  matter  con- 
sisted of  12.20  per  cent,  ash,  21.82  per  cent,  protein,  10.30  per  cent,  fiber, 
53.76  per  cent,  extract  matter  and  1.92  per  cent.  fat. 

The  heads  minus  leaves  contained  90.34  per  cent,  water,  and  the  dry 
matter  consisted  of  8.22  per  cent,  ash,  17.98  per  cent,  protein,  9.84  per 
cent,  fiber,  62.77  per  cent,  extract  matter  and  1.19  per  cent.  fat. 

The  outside  leaves  contained  80.95  per  cent,  water,  and  the  dry  matter 
consisted  of  14.49  per  cent,  ash,  11.94  per  cent,  protein,  13.12  per  cent, 
fiber,  58.04  per  cent,  extract  matter  and  2.41  per  cent.  fat.  The  exterior 
leaves  contained  about  twice  as  much  dry  matter  as  the  heads. 

Cabbage  is  rich  in  protein,  —  in  fact,  considerably  richer  than  the 
legumes,  —  on  an  equal  moisture  basis.  It  is  rich  also  in  ash,  particularly 
the  leaves,  which  may  have  been  due  in  part  to  the  adherence  of  soil 
particles.    The  percentages  of  fiber  and  fat  are  relatively  low. 


320       MASS.   EXPERIMENT    STATION   BULLETIN    181. 

The  cabbage  was  fed  in  combination  with  hay,  and  con.stituted  25  to  34 
per  cent,  of  tlie  dry  matter  of  the  total  rations,  the  latter  having  nutritive 
ratios  of  from  1 :6.6  to  1 :9. 


Suminartj  of  Coefficients  for  Cabbage. 
Whole  Cabbage. 


Series. 

Period. 

Sheep. 

Dry 

Matter. 

Ash. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Nitrogen- 
free 
Extract. 

Fat. 

XIX 

XIX 

7 
7 

I. 

II. 

89.35 
86.49 

59.74 
54.19 

84.59 

87.67 

109.57 

72.48 

95.50 
96.22 

71.11 
68.33 

Average, 

87.92 

56.97 

86.13 

91.03 

95.86 

69.72 

Heads  Minus  Leaves. 


XVIII., 
XVIII., 

4 
4 

I. 
II. 

99.84 
95.81 

80.55 
74.02 

84.92       124.79 
C8.15        99.74 

103.16 
101.48 

53.23 
32.07 

Average, 

97.83 

77.29 

76.54 

112.27 

102.32 

42.67 

Leaves. 


XVIII.,         .        .             6 
XVIII.,         .        .             5 

I. 
II. 

76.84 
71.39 

45.71 
44.23 

66.69 
60.90 

80.66 
75.79 

87.38 
81.30 

45.37 
29.40 

Average 

74.12 

44.97 

63  .«0 

78.23 

84.34 

37.39 

The  whole  cabbage  was  quite  well  digested,  with  an  average  dry  matter 
percentage  in  case  of  the  two  sheep  of  88  per  cent.  The  fiber  averaged 
91  per  cent,  digestible,  showing  in  case  at  least  of  one  of  the  sheep  that  it 
had  improved  the  digestibility  of  the  fiber  in  the  hay.  The  extract 
matter  also  had  a  high  digestibility  (96  per  cent.). 

The  heads  proved  rather  more  digestible  than  the  whole  cabbage, 
namely,  98  per  cent.,  the  protein  77  per  cent.,  and  both  the  fiber  and 
extract  matter  over  100  per  cent.  It  seems  evident  that  the  cabbage 
exercised  a  beneficial  effect  upon  the  hay  with  which  it  was  fed. 

The  leaves  did  not  prove  as  digestible  as  the  center,  although  one 
notes  that  the  dry  matter  averaged  74  per  cent,  digestible,  the  protein 
64  per  cent.,  the  fiber  78  per  cent,  and  the  extract  matter  84  per  cent. 

The  whole  cabbage,  head  minus  leaves,  and  leaves  would  contain  of 
digestible  organic  matter,  on  the  basis  of  our  data,  in  2,000  pounds,  the 
following:  — 


DIGESTION    EXPERIMENTS    WITH    SHEEP. 


321 


Water 

(Per 

Cent.). 


Protein 
(Pounds). 


Fiber        I^^Vter*         ^^' 
(Pound8).!(Matt^^  (Pounds) 


Total 
Fat  X  2.2 
(Pounds). 


Nutritive 
Ratio. 


Whole  cabbage,  . 

Head, 

Leaves, 


88.3 
90.3 
81.0 


43.88 
26.73 
29.02 


21.92 
19.32 
38.80 


120.74 
123.20 
185.24 


3.12 
1.17 
3.38 


193.40 
171.82 
260.50 


1:3.4 
1:5.4 
1:8.0 


Because  of  the  less  moisture  content  the  leaves  show  a  larger  amount  of 
total  organic  nutrients  than  either  the  total  cabbage  or  the  interior.  On 
the  basis  of  88.3  per  cent,  water,  —  that  found  in  the  whole  cabbage,  — 
the  interior  shows  207.2  and  the  leaves  160.4  pounds  of  digestible  organic 
nutrients  per  ton.  The  whole  cabbage,  head  and  leaves,  have  the  following 
relative  values  based  upon  digestible  organic  nutrients  and  natural 
moisture,  or  an  equivalent  moisture  content  of  88.3  per  cent.:  — 


Equal 

Moisture 

Basis. 


Whole  cabbage, 
Head,  . 
Leaves, 


100 
106 
83 


(b)  Carrots. 
Summary  of  Coefficients  of  Carrots. 


Series. 

Period. 

Sheep. 

Dry 

Matter. 

Ash.      Protein. 

Fiber. 

Nitrogen- 
free 
Extract. 

Fat. 

XIX.. 

XIX., 

XX., 

XX., 

XX.. 

XX., 

XX., 

XX., 

8 
8 
8 
8 
8 
9 
9 
9 

I. 

II. 
IV. 

v. 

VL 

rv. 

V. 
VI. 

89.10 
94.42 
74.42 
87.81 
83.73 
100.70 
115.80 
135.05 

33.48 
46.40 
50.22 
64.89 
43.77 
74.24 
91.86 
96.15 

52.03 

77.87 
77.71 
85.35 
86.53 
87.61 
106.00 
127.94 

131.89 
154.59 
40.19 
101.96 
82.06 
89.58 
148.71 
197.52 

95.66 
99.91 
85.71 
93.22 
93.04 
105.20 
113.51 
130.76 

79.63 
91.20 

25.87 

9.95 

162.90 

204.34 

228.23 

Average, 

100.95 

64.40 

89.05 

129.47 

104.75 

114.66 

Two  different  lots  of  carrots  were  fed.  They  averaged  87.64  per  cent, 
water,  and  in  dry  matter  contained  9.56  per  cent,  ash,  10.11  per  cent, 
protein,  8.53  per  cent,  fiber,  70.71  per  cent,  extract  matter  and  1.09  per 


322       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION    BULLETIN    181. 

cent.  fat.  They  are  low  in  protein,  fiber  and  fat,  and  quite  high  in  ash 
and  in  extract  matter. 

In  the  first  and  second  experiments  they  were  fed  in  combination  with 
hay,  and  constituted  about  30  per  cent,  of  the  total  dry  matter  which 
had  a  nutritive  ratio  of  1 :10  to  1 :13.6.  In  the  third  experiment  they  were 
fed  together  with  hay  and  gluten  feed,  and  composed  about  15  per  cent, 
of  the  dry  matter  of  the  ration,  which  had  a  nutritive  ratio  of  1 :7.6.  Sheep 
IV,  in  Series  XX.,  Period  8,  showed  such  a  low  rate  of  digestibility  that 
the  results  were  not  included  in  the  average.  With  this  exception  the 
coefficients  resulting  from  the  hay  and  carrot  combination  agree  reasonably 
well,  and  show  88.76  per  cent,  of  the  dry  matter  to  have  been  digested. 
The  protein  and  extract  matter  are  also  shown  to  have  been  quite  well 
assimilated.  The  fat  is  so  small  in  amount  that  the  results  have  no 
particular  meaning.  In  most  cases  a  high  fiber  digestibility  is  observed; 
in  fact,  more  was  apparently  digested  than  was  consumed. 

Where  the  carrots  were  fed  with  hay  and  gluten  feed  more  of  the  dry 
matter  was  apparently  digested  than  was  fed.  Thus  one  observes  co- 
efficients of  117  for  the  dry  matter,  107  protein,  145  fiber  and  116  extract 
matter.  This,  it  is  believed,  was  due  to  the  coefficients  used  for  the 
digestibility  of  the  basal  ration,  composed  of  hay  and  gluten  feed.  These 
coefficients  for  some  reason  averaged  only  62.43  for  the  dry  matter,  as 
against  68.4,  the  average  for  all  of  the  other  experiments.  If,  however, 
one  uses  the  average  figure  of  68.4,  the  coefficients  for  the  dry  matter  of 
the  carrots  vary  from  67.4  to  101.66. 

The  coefficients  as  a  whole  indicate  that  carrots  were  quite  fully  utilized, 
and  that  they  seemed  to  improve  the  digestibility  of  the  basal  ration  with 
which  they  were  fed.     It  is  proposed  to  study  this  matter  more  fully. 

(c)  Mangels. 
Summary  of  Coefficients  of  Mangels. 


Series. 

Period.      Sheep. 

Dry 

Matter. 

Ash. 

Protein.     Fiber. 

Nitrogen- 
free 
Extract. 

Fat. 

XVIII., 
XVIII., 
XVIII., 
XVIII.. 

3 
3 
6 
6 

V. 
VI. 

V. 
VI. 

86.90 
88.74 
85.43 
87.20 

1.55 
18.12 
41.31 
52.36 

41.21 
51.18 
48.36 
63.00 

103.45 
103.81 
89.58 
85.31 

95.79 
96.29 
93.40 
93.67 

- 

Average 

Average  of  all  previous  trials  (6), 

87.07 
84 

30.58 

50.94 
59 

95.54 

78 

94.76 
94 

- 

Four  single  trials  were  carried  out  with  one  lot  of  mangels  which  con- 
tained 83.10  per  cent,  of  water,  — ^less  than  is  found  usually  in  this  root. 
In  the  dry  matter  there  was  6.10  per  cent,  ash,  5.84  per  cent,  protein, 


DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH   SHEEP. 


323 


6.3S  per  cent,  fiber,  81.40  per  cent,  extract  matter  and  .28  per  cent.  fat. 
The  mangels  were  very  low  in  protein,  fiber  and  fat,  and  high  in  extract 
matter.  They  were  fed  in  combination  with  hay  only,  and  constituted 
from  40  to  about  47  per  cent,  of  the  total  dry  matter  of  the  combined 
ration,  which  had  a  nutritive  ratio  of  1:11  to  1:13.  The  coefficients  are 
quite  satisfactory,  showing  the  dry  matter  to  be  87,  the  protein  51  and 
the  fiber  and  extract  matter  95  per  cent,  digested.  It  is  possible  that 
the  mangels  improved  the  digestibility  of  the  hay  somewhat,  but  it  is 
regretted  that  they  were  not  fed  also  with  a  combination  of  hay  and  a 
protein  concentrate  in  order  to  note  if  they  would  not  have  had  a  more 
pronounced  effect. 

(d)  Pumpkins. 
Summary  of  Coefficierds  of  Entire  Pumpkins. 


Series. 

Period. 

Sheep. 

Dry 

Matter. 

Ash. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Nitrogen- 
free 
Extract. 

Fat. 

XIX., 

XIX.. 

XX., 

XX., 

XX., 

XX., 

XX., 

6 
6 
2 
2 
3 
3 
4 

I. 
II. 

I. 
II. 

I. 
II. 

I. 

7.5.87 
89.32 
81.62 
88.23 
78.80 
75.41 
75.57 

64.82 
63.93 
70.96 
62.99 
68.35 
49.82 
76.91 

70.50 

80.69 
67.89 
76.20 
83.63 

82.57 
74.81 

59.74 
86.30 
65.20 
83.59 
47.80 
46.23 
38.49 

81.54 
98.12 
90.84 
96.40 
86.30 
83.83 
83.82 

96.29 
96.87 
89.27 
91.76 
88.10 
84.69 
94.23 

Average 

80.69  j      65.40 

76.61 

61.05 

88.69 

91.60 

F 

*umpkins  minus  Seeds  and  Connecting  Tissue. 

XIX 

XIX 

4 
4 

I. 
II. 

109.23       105.13 
93.84         59.48 

92.55 
93.96 

137.52 
95.16 

108.99       101.44 
102.44         83.81 

Average 101.54 

82.31 

93.26 

116.34 

105.72 

92.63 

Two  lots  of  pumpkins,  grown  on  two  different  farms  in  successive  years, 
were  used.  One  lot  was  tested  whole,  and  also  without  the  seeds  and 
connecting  tissue.  The  whole  pumpkins  averaged  87.53  per  cent,  water, 
and  the  dry  matter  contained  7.74  per  cent,  ash,  15.60  per  cent,  protein, 
15  per  cent,  fiber,  49.37  per  cent,  extract  matter  and  12.29  per  cent.  fat. 
The  edible  portion  contained  94.58  per  cent,  water,  and  its  dry  matter 
consisted  of  8.81  per  cent,  ash,  13.74  per  cent,  protein,  17.33  per  cent, 
fiber,  57.56  per  cent,  extract  matter  and  2.56  per  cent.  fat. 

Wider  variations  occur  in  the  digestibility  of  the  different  ingredients 
by  the  two  sheep  than  are  desirable.     In  case  of  Series  XX.,  Periods  3 


324       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 


and  4,  where  the  pumpkins  were  fed  with  a  basal  ration  of  hay  and  gluten 
feed,  the  coefficients  for  the  fiber,  extract  matter  and  fat  appear  to  be  lower 
than  when  the  basal  ration  consisted  of  hay  only.  One  would  expect 
contrary  results,  for  the  combination  of  hay  and  pumpkins  had  a  nutritive 
ratio  of  1:9  to  1:11,  and  the  hay,  gluten  feed  and  pumpkins  a  ratio  of 
approximately  1:7.5.  The  lower  digestibility  of  the  pumpkins  in  the 
hay-gluten-feed-pumpkin  ration  may  have  been  caused  by  the  extra 
amount  of  total  dry  matter  fed  (approximately  100  grams  daily). 

The  coefficients  for  the  pumpkins  minus  the  seeds  are  considerably 
higher,  and,  so  far  as  one  is  able  to  judge  from  the  results,  indicate  that 
the  pumpkins  had  a  favorable  effect  upon  the  digestibility  of  the  hay. 
When  the  entire  fruit  was  fed  no  seeds  or  parts  of  seeds  were  found  in  the 
feces. 

In  general,  it  may  be  said  that  th^  entire  pumpkins  appear  to  be  fairly 
well  digested,  but  not  quite  as  fully  as  are  mangels,  turnips  and  carrots. 
Their  relative  feeding  values  will  depend  considerably  upon  their  content 
of  dry  matter.  The  large  percentage  of  fat  in  the  pumpkin  tends  to 
increase  slightly  its  feeding  value  pound  for  pound  over  most  of  the  root 
crops. 

(e)  Turnips. 
Summary  of  Coefficients  of  Turnips. 


Series. 

Period. 

Sheep. 

Dry 

Matter. 

Ash. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Nitrogen- 
free 
Extract. 

Fat. 

XVIII.. 
XVIII.. 

7 
7 

V. 
VI. 

88.78 
89.17 

55.34 
51.38 

70.15 
81.08 

87.75 
75.55 

95.48 
96.64 

56.90 
75.86 

Average, 

88.98 

53.36 

75.62 

81.65 

96.06 

66.38 

One  lot  only  of  Swedish  turnips  was  tested,  which  contained  86.21  per 
cent,  water;  the  dry  matter  tested  7.33  per  cent,  ash,  9.58  per  cent, 
protein,  10.99  per  cent,  fiber,  71.31  per  cent,  extract  matter  and  .79  per 
cent.  fat.  They  were  rather  richer  in  protein  and  fiber  than  mangels, 
and  somewhat  lower  in  carbohydrate  matter.  At  the  same  time  they 
may  be  regarded  as  carbohydrate  in  character.  They  were  fed  together 
with  hay,  and  constituted  38  per  cent,  of  the  total  ration,  which  had  a 
nutritive  ratio  of  1 :10.4.  The  results  with  the  two  sheep  agree  very  closely, 
the  sheep  digesting  89  per  cent,  of  the  dry  matter,  76  per  cent,  of  the  pro- 
tein, 82  per  cent,  of  the  fiber  and  96  per  cent,  of  the  starchy  matter. 


DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH   SHEEP. 


325 


Comparative  Summary  of  Coefficients  for  Roots  and  Vegetables. 


Digestion  Coefficients. 

Digestible  Or- 

Water 

(Per 

Cent.). 

ganic  Nu- 

Dry 
Matter. 

Ash. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Nitrogen- 
free 
Extract. 

Fat. 

trients  in  2,000 

Pounds 
(Basis,  88  Per 
Cent.  Water). 

Whole  cabbage, 

88 

88 

57 

86 

91 

96 

70 

193 

Carrots,    . 

88 

101 

64 

89 

129 

105 

115 

233 

Mangels,  . 

83 

87 

31 

51 

96 

95 

- 

196 

Turnips,  . 

86 

89 

53 

76 

82 

96 

66 

204 

Pumpkins, 

88 

81 

65 

77 

61 

89 

92 

212 

The  total  dry  matter  of  the  carrots  appears  to  be  more  fully  digestible 
and  the  dry  matter  of  the  pumpkin  less  digestible  than  that  of  the  mangels, 
turnips  and  cabbage,  the  coeflBcients  of  which  are  quite  uniform.  The 
protein  shows  a  high  and  uniform  digestibility  excepting  that  contained 
in  the  mangels.  The  fiber  —  excepting  in  the  pumpkins,  with  its  hard 
shell  and  seed  covering  —  is  shown  to  be  quite  well  digested,  as  is  also  the 
extract  matter.  The  fat  is  not  of  much  consequence  excepting  in  the 
pumpkin,  which  contains  over  12  per  cent,  with  a  high  digestion  coefiicient. 
On  a  uniform  moisture  basis  of  88  per  cent.,  the  total  digestible  organic 
nutrients  (including  the  fat  multiplied  by  2.2)  do  not  vary  widely  from 
each  other,  with  the  exception  of  the  carrots,  which  merit  further  study. 


Summary  of  Coefficients  of  Vegetable  Ivory  Meal. 


Sehies. 

Period. 

Sheep. 

Dry 

Matter. 

Ash. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Nitrogen - 

free 
Extract. 

Fat. 

XIX.,    . 

5 

V. 

84.43 

44.35 

- 

55.01 

93.27 

- 

XIX., 

5 

VI. 

89.63 

17.99 

30.04 

85.82 

93.89 

45.45 

XX.. 

13 

IV. 

88.20 

63.59 

10.57 

76.08 

93.60 

39.01 

XX., 

13 

V. 

98.96 

94.01 

34.61 

120.48 

99.99 

60.28 

XX., 

13 

VI. 

101.71 

44.24 

41.70 

129.22 

102.28 

31.91 

XXI., 

3 

IV. 

78.59 

193.81 

1.59 

51.07 

85.81 

61.82 

XXI., 

3 

V. 

81.04 

- 

4.77 

100.06 

89.94 

47.10 

XXL, 

3 

VI. 

84.03 

90.95 

6.04 

66.45 

91.98 

58.70 

Average, 

. 

88.33 

78.42 

18.47 

85.52 

93.84 

49.18 

Corn  meal  for  comparison, 

88 

- 

67 

- 

92 

90 

326       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 

This  material  represents  the  sawdust  or  shavings  from  the  vegetable 
ivory,  or  the  corozo  nut  {Phytelephas  niacrocarpa).  A  complete  report 
on  its  composition,  digestibility  and  feeding  value  has  been  published 
elsewhere.  1  The  details  of  the  several  digestion  tests,  however,  were  not 
given.  The  nut  is  used  in  the  manufacture  of  buttons  and  similar  ma- 
terials; the  residue  is  practically  tasteless  and  of  a  tough,  horny  nature. 
Animals  will  not  eat  it  when  fed  by  itself,  but  usually  consume  it  readily 
if  mixed  with  one  or  more  grains.  It  averaged  in  composition  10.76  per 
cent,  water,  and  in  dry  matter  1.25  per  cent,  ash,  5.36  per  cent,  crude 
protein,  8.01  per  cent,  fiber,  84.37  per  cent,  extract  matter  and  1.01  per 
cent.  fat.  Its  extract  or  carbohydrate  matter  is  nearly  all  in  the  form  of 
mannan,  yielding  mannose  on  hydrolysis. 

The  material  in  all  cases  was  fed  with  550  grams  of  hay  and  150  grams 
of  gluten  feed  as  a  basal  ration,  and  constituted  some  30  per  cent,  of  the 
total  ration. 

A  glance  at  the  results  show  that  the  coefficients  secured  in  Period  13 
(hitherto  unpublished)  are  noticeably  above  the  others.  This  is  believed 
to  have  been  caused  by  the  use  of  the  coefficients  secured  for  a  basal  ration 
of  hay  and  gluten  feed,  which  gave  62  as  the  digestibility  of  the  dry  matter 
as  against  66  for  the  basal  ration  of  hay  and  gluten  feed  employed  in  the 
other  e.xperiments.  The  average  of  the  coefficients  secured  in  Periods  5 
and  3  (as  published)  gave  84  for  the  dry  matter  and  92  for  the  extract 
matter,  and  are  believed  to  be  more  nearly  correct. 

The  coefficients  secured  for  the  protein,  fiber  and  fat  are  not  surprising, 
in  view  of  the  smallness  of  the  amounts  present  in  the  ivory  meal  in  com- 
parison with  the  total  amounts  of  these  ingredients  consumed.  The 
larger  part  of  the  ivory  meal  consists  of  carbohydrate  matter,  and  it  was 
quite  well  digested.  How  the  mannan  was  decomposed  in  the  digestive 
tract  is  not  clear;  it  was  found,  however,  to  have  largely  disappeared  in 
the  feces.  The  ivory  meal  evidently  is  as  fully  digested  as  corn  meal,  and 
our  published  results  of  experiments  with  dairy  animals  demonstrate  it  to 
have  considerable  nutritive  value. 


Summary  of  Coefficients  of  Vinegar  Grains. 


Series. 

Period. 

Sheep. 

Dry 

Matter. 

Ash. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Nitrogen - 

free 
Extract. 

Fat. 

XXII 

XXII 

XXII 

XXII 

9 
9 

10 
10 

IX. 
XI. 

IV. 
VI. 

54.77 
55.01 
65.60 
67.48 

29.08 

62.91 
59.28 
69.47 
66.00 

47.02 
50.59 
60.92 
73.87 

50.92 
52.63 
54.71 
65.60 

84.20 
88.08 
89.30 
68.70 

Average 

Dried  brewers'  grains  for  comparison 
(5). 

60.70 
61 

- 

64.42 

81 

58.10 

49 

55.97 
57 

82.57 
89 

1  Beals  and  Lindsey:  Journal  of  Agricultural  Research,  Vol.  VII.,  No.  7. 


DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH    SHEEP. 


327 


Vinegar  grains  were  put  out  by  the  Fleischmann  Company,  Chicago, 
and  represent  the  residue  in  the  manufacture  of  yeast,  or  possibly  of 
yeast  and  distilled  liquors.  They  tested  7.63  per  cent,  water,  and  the 
dry  matter  contained  2.54  per  cent,  ash,  20.39  per  cent,  protein,  20.12 
per  cent,  fiber,  50.33  per  cent,  extract  matter  and  6.62  per  cent.  fat.  They 
were  fed  together  with  hay  to  four  sheep.  For  some  reason  Sheep  IX.  and 
XI.  did  not  digest  them  as  well  as  did  Sheep  IV.  and  VI.  The  average 
results  from  the  four  sheep  show  that  in  total  digestible  matter,  fiber  and 
extract  they  compare  well  with  dried  brewers'  grains,  although  the  pro- 
tein of  the  latter  is  more  completely  utilized.  They  are  certainly  an 
addition  to  our  supply  of  protein  concentrates,  and  can  be  used  in  the 
grain  ration  in  a  similar  way  to  dried  brewers'  grains. 

Summary  of  Coefficients  of  New  Bedford  Garbage  Tankage. 


Series. 

Period. 

Sheep. 

Dry 

Matter. 

Ash. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Nitrogen- 
free 
Extract. 

Fat. 

XXL,    . 
XXL,    .        . 
XXL,    . 

8 
8 
8 

IV.  1 

V. 

VI. 

54.22 
77.33 
81.12 

63.14 
73  06 
74.22 

33.90 
30.02 
45.18 

145.8 
116.8 

68.04 
87.18 
92.01 

100.0 
147.0 

Average, 

79.22 

73.64 

37.6 

131.3 

89.6 

123.5 

1  Excluded  from  average. 


This  tankage  represents  the  garbage  collected  in  the  city  of  New  Bed- 
ford which  was  treated  by  the  so-called  Cobwell  process.  Briefly  stated, 
the  method  of  treatment  consists  in  removing,  so  far  as  possible,  from  the 
material  as  received,  all  glass,  tin  cans,  banana  and  orange  peel,  after  which 
the  residue  is  placed  in  large  iron  tanks  and  treated  with  benzine  to  re- 
move the  fat,  which  process  also  takes  out  the  larger  part  of  the  water. 
It  is  then  run  over  conveyors,  and  any  other  objectionable  material  is 
removed,  after  which  it  is  ground. 

The  tankage  contained  8.53  per  cent,  water,  and  in  dry  matter  15.72 
per  cent,  ash,  22.02  per  cent,  protein,  9.67  per  cent,  fiber,  50.92  per  cent, 
extract  matter  and  1.67  per  cent.  fat.  It  was  in  good  mechanical  con- 
dition, was  fed  with  hay  and  gluten  feed,  and  constituted  about  18  per 
cent,  of  the  ration,  which  had  a  nutritive  ratio  of  1 :7. 

Sheep  IV.  digested  the  tankage  poorly,  and  it  has  seemed  wise  to 
exclude  the  coefficients  from  the  average  of  those  secured  with  the  other 
two  sheep. 

The  protein  was  not  well  digested,  which  indicated  its  inferiority  as 
compared  with  material  derived  from  slaughterhouses.  This  was  con- 
firmed by  subjecting  the  tankage  to  the  action  of  the  alkaline  permanganate 
method  for  determining  nitrogen  availability,  and  the  securing  of  an 


328       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 

availability  coefficient  of  44.66.  Any  nitrogenous  matter  testing  below 
50  by  this  method  is  considered  of  poor  quality.  The  extract  matter  was 
quite  well  utilized,  and  likewise  the  small  amount  of  fat.  The  fiber  for 
some  reason  appeared  to  be  completely  digested,  which  is  not  probable. 
The  non-nitrogenous  matter  of  the  tankage  was  quite  well  utilized, 
but  the  protein  is  likelj''  to  prove  inferior  to  the  better  grades  of  animal  or 
vegetable  nitrogenous  concentrates. 


Summary  of  Coefficients  of  New  Bedford  Pig  Meal. 


Series. 

Period. 

Sheep. 

Dry 

Matter. 

Ash. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Nitrogen- 
free 
Extract. 

Fat. 

XX.,     . 

XX 

11 
11 

IV. 
VI. 

68.99 
69.29 

48.02 
40.96 

67.35 
71.39 

18.45 
26.18 

84.02 
83.40 

133.77 

142.88 

Average 

69.14 

44.49        69.37        22.32 

83.71 

138.33 

This  material  according  to  the  manufacturers  was  composed  of  73  per 
cent,  garbage  tankage,  18  per  cent,  standard  middlings,  7  per  cent,  pre- 
pared, molasses  feed  and  2  per  cent,  linseed  meal.  It  tested  8.80  per  cent, 
water,  and  the  dry  material  consisted  of  19.65  per  cent,  ash,  23.59  per 
cent,  protein,  9.15  per  cent,  fiber,  44.30  per  cent,  extract  matter  and  3.31 
per  cent.  fat. 

The  sheep  digested  the  entire  mixture  fairly  well.  Evidently  the 
addition  of  the  vegetable  concentrates  improved  the  digestibility  of  the 
total  protein  in  the  mixture.  The  fiber  was  poorly  digested,  but  the 
extract  matter  and  particularly  the  fat  showed  high  coefficients. 

It  is  quite  reasonable  to  assume  that  garbage  tankage  is  likely  to  vary 
considerably  in  quality. 


Summary  of  Coefficients  of  Rowen. 


Series. 

Period. 

Sheep. 

Dry 

Matter. 

Ash.      Protein. 

Nitrogen- 
Fiber,         free           Fat. 
Extract. 

XXII 

XXII 

15 
15 

XII. 
XIII. 

60.81 
61.16 

34.23 

35.76 

60.39 
60.27 

68.12 
68.08 

63.37 
63.57 

30.01 
34.53 

Average, 

Average  previous  trials  (12), 

60.99 
65 

34.40 

60.33 
70 

68.10 
66 

63.47 
65 

32.27 
47 

Rowen  represents  the  second  gro\vth  of  meadows,  and  contains  in 
addition  to  the  grasses  a  considerable  admixture  of  clover.  The  samples 
tested  contained  9.13  per  cent,  of  water,  and  in  dry  matter  showed  7.19 


DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH    SHEEP. 


329 


per  cent,  ash,  8.14  per  cent,  protein,  49.02  per  cent,  extract  matter,  2.39 
per  cent,  fat  and  33.2G  per  cent,  fiber.  While  of  satisfactory  appearance 
it  was  inferior  in  composition  to  the  average,  which  has  been  shown  to 
test  11.4  per  cent,  protein  and  24.1  per  cent,  fiber  on  a  14  per  cent,  water 
basis. 

The  digestion  tests  agree  exceedingly  well,  but  confirm  the  analysis, 
showing  it  to  be  rather  less  digestible  than  the  average  of  previous  trials. 


Summary  of  Coefficients  of  Soy  Bean  Hay. 


Series. 

Period. 

Sheep. 

Dry 

Matter. 

Ash. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Nitrogen- 
free 
Extract. 

Fat. 

XX 

XX 

7 
7 

V. 
VI. 

52.27 
61.03 

11.63 
29.26 

70.90 

78.86 

49.36 
55.75 

54.78 
64.72 

53.91 
64.71 

Average, 

Average  previous  trials  (4), 

56.65 
60 

20.44 

74.88 
73 

52.56 
57 

59.75 
64 

59.31 
44 

The  medium  green  soy  beans  were  grown  upon  the  station  grounds, 
and  were  cut  to  put  in  the  silo  about  the  middle  of  September.  They  had 
not  suflSciently  matured  to  warrant  their  use  as  a  seed  crop.  At  the  time 
of  making  the  test  the  hay  contained  11.73  per  cent,  of  water,  and,  on  a 
dry  matter  basis,  6.63  per  cent,  ash,  15.86  per  cent,  protein,  34.88  per  cent, 
fiber,  40.56  per  cent,  extract  matter  and  2.07  per  cent.  fat.  The  tough, 
fibrous  nature  of  the  straw  is  in  evidence  in  the  high  fiber  content  of  the 
hay.  Sheep  V.  was  not  able  to  digest  the  hay  as  well  as  Sheep  VI.  The 
results  for  the  latter  sheep  agree  fairly  well  with  the  average  of  the  four 
other  trials  reported. 

With  the  exception  of  the  protein  the  ingredients  in  soy  bean  hay  appear 
to  be  about  equal  in  digestibility  to  those  contained  in  average  English 
hay.  The  higher  digestibility  of  the  protein  is  due  to  the  presence  of  the 
beans.  It  is  believed  soy  beans  should  be  ensiled  with  com  rather  than 
made  into  hay. 


Summary  of  Coefficients  of  Stevens'  "44-"  Dairy  Ration. 


Series. 

Period. 

Sheep. 

Dry 

Matter. 

Ash. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Nitrogen- 
free 
Extract. 

Fat. 

XXII.,  . 

XXII 

11 
11 

IV. 

VI. 

72.55 

68.58 

26.03 

82.14 
77.23 

45.36 
55.01 

72.58 
69.23 

91.88 
71.08 

Average, 

70.57 

26.03 

79.69 

50.19 

70.91 

81.48 

330       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 


The  Stevens'  "44"  Dairy  Ration  is  one  of  the  numerous  proprietary- 
dairy  rations  offered  in  Massachusetts  markets.  It  is  claimed  to  be  a 
mixture  of  a  great  variety  of  the  most  desirable  grains  and  by-products. 

It  had  8.94  per  cent,  water,  and  in  dry  matter  4.17  per  cent,  ash, 
26.95  per  cent,  protein,  12.88  per  cent,  fiber,  49.56  per  cent,  extract  matter 
and  6.44  per  cent.  fat.  Its  high  fiber  content  indicated  the  presence  of 
some  unsatisfactory  material,  and  this  was  confirmed  by  the  digestion  test. 

The  mixture  proved  to  be  fairly  well  digested,  but  not  equal  in  total 
digestibility  to  mixtures  of  bran,  cottonseed  meal,  gluten  feed  and  corn 
or  hominy  meal.  The  fiber  digestibility  was  considerably  below  that 
secured  for  hay,  whUe  the  extract  matter  was  below  what  one  would 
expect  in  high-grade  material.  The  protein,  on  the  other  hand,  was 
quite  well  digested. 

Digestibility  of  Svdav  Grass. 

This  grass  {Andwpoqon  sorghum  var.)  was  introduced  into  the  United 
States  in  1909,  and  has  been  tried  at  this  station  for  a  number  of  years. 
A  full  report  on  its  merits  will  be  given  elsewhere.  The  green  material 
contained  from  76.5  to  80.42  per  cent,  of  ^\ater  when  cut,  and  the  hay 
averaged  14.47  per  cent,  of  water.  On  the  basis  of  dry  matter  the  two 
samples  of  green  material  averaged  6.84  per  cent,  ash,  13  per  cent,  crude 
protein,  29.10  per  cent,  fiber,  47.13  per  cent,  extract  matter  and  3.93  per 
cent.  fat.  The  hay  averaged  in  drj-  matter  8.93  per  cent,  ash,  13.85 
per  cent,  crude  protein,  33.85  per  cent,  fiber,  41.80  per  cent,  extract 
matter  and  1.53  per  cent.  fat.  The  green  material  was  fed  with  English 
hay,  and  the  ration  had  a  nutritive  ratio  of  1:8.3.  The  Sudan  hay  in 
three  out  of  four  experiments  was  fed  exclusively,  and  had  a  nutritive 
ratio  of  1 :5.7. 

Summary  of  Coefficients  of  Sudan  Grass. 


Series. 

Period. 

Sheep. 

Condition  of  Grass. 

Dry 

Matter. 

Ash. 

Pro- 
tein. 

Fiber. 

Extract 
Matter. 

Fat. 

XXII. 
XXII. 

17 
17 

XII. 
XIII. 

Green,    first    crop 

(heading). 
Green,    first    crop 

(heading). 

77.23 
70.84 

86.93 
39.96 

79.61 
79.16 

85.45 
77.97 

.  69.63 
68.97 

86.59 
80.34 

Average 

74.04 

63.45 

79.39 

81.71 

69.30 

83.47 

XXII. 
XXII. 

1 
1 

IV. 
VI. 

Green,  second  crop, 
Green.second  crop, 

65.41 
65.09 

37.97 
24.30 

62.86 
68.07 

69.40 
69.42 

67.70 
67.69 

64.69 
58.51 

Average, 

65.25 

31.14 

65.47 

69.41 

67.70 

61.60 

XXII. 
XXII. 

3 
3 

IV 

VI. 

Dry,  second  crop,  . 
Dry,  second  crop. 

59.99 
59.37 

45.07 
40.27 

58.13       73.62 
61.40       72.76 

54.35 
53.52 

35.63 
35.32 

Average 

59.68 

42.67 

59.77 

73.19 

53.94 

35.48 

DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH    SHEEP. 


331 


In  Period  17,  first  crop,  Sheep  XII.  digested  the  material  rather  better 
than  Sheep  XIII. 

In  Period  1  the  green  material,  second  crop,  scarcely  in  head,  was  cut 
and  fed  in  September.  At  the  same  time,  some  of  it  was  made  into  hay 
and  fed  later.  The  total  dry  matter  of  the  hay  was  over  4  per  cent,  less 
digestible  than  the  same  material  fed  green.  Strange  to  say,  the  fiber 
showed  a  somewhat  higher  digestibilitj^  in  the  hay,  while  the  extract 
matter  was  noticeably  less  digestible.  As  might  have  been  expected, 
the  fat  (ether  extract)  showed  a  lower  digestibility  in  the  hay,  due  probably 
to  the  fact  that  the  sheep  were  able  more  thoroughly  to  extract  such  sub- 
stances out  of  the  green  plant.  For  some  reason  the  sheep  digested  the 
second  crop  (green)  less  fully  than  they  did  the  first.  The  latter  was  cut 
in  1917,  and  the  former  in  September,  1916.  Whether  the  lessened 
digestibility  was  due  to  the  climatic  variations  prevailing  in  two  different 
years,  or  because  a  second  growth  was  actually  not  as  digestible  as  the 
first,  it  is  not  possible  to  say.  The  average  of  the  coefficients  of  the  two 
lots  of  green  Sudan  grass  follows,  together  with  green  barnyard  millet, 
sorghum  and  corn  for  comparison. 


Average  Coefficients  for 

Comparison. 

Number 

of 

Different 

Lots. 

Single 
Trials. 

Dry 

Matter. 

Ash. 

Pro- 
tein. 

Fiber. 

Extract 
Matter. 

Fat. 

Sudan  grass, 

Barnyard  millet  (blossom), 
Sorghum  (past  blossom),  . 
Corn  fodder  (dent)  milk,  . 

2 
3 

2 

7 

4 
6 
4 
17 

69.64 
70.00 
65  00 
70.00 

47.30 
56.00 
42.00 
39.00 

72.42 
65  00 
44.00 
62.00 

75.56 
73.00 
55.00 
64.00 

68.50 
71.00 
73.00 
77.00 

72.54 
58.00 
64.00 
76.00 

The  above  comparison  indicates  that  Sudan  grass  in  digestibility  is 
fully  equal  to  other  important  green  feeds. 


Summary  of  Coefficients  of  Sudan  Hay. 


Nitro- 

Series. 

Period. 

Sheep. 

Character  of  Hay. 

Dry 

Matter. 

Ash. 

Pro- 
tein. 

Fiber. 

gen-free 
Ex- 
tract. 

Fat. 

XXII. 

7 

IX. 

Before  heading,  first 

56.25 

55.92 

56.63 

66.38 

49.24 

23.01 

XXII. 

7 

XII. 

Before  heading,  first 

55.14 

51.42 

55.22 

66.42 

48.74 

10.38 

XXII. 

7 

XIII. 

crop. 
Before  heading,  first 
crop. 

57.15 

56.93 

57.83 

66.82 

50.51 

19.62 

Average, 

56.18 

54.76 

56.56 

66.54 

49.50 

17.67 

332       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 


Summary  of  Coefficients  of  Sudan  Hay  —  Concluded. 


Series. 

Period. 

Sheep. 

Character  of  Hay.      ^^^ 

Ash. 

Pro- 
tein. 

Nitro- 
Fiber,  g^^-ff « 
tract. 

Fat. 

XXII. 
XXII. 
XXII. 

6 

4 
4 

IX. 
IX. 
XI. 

Heading,  first  crop. 

Full  blossom,    first 

crop. 
Full   blossom,   first 

crop. 

59.19 
68.11 

54.72 

55.48 
53.50 
42.25 

64.36 
62.37 
47.73 

68.40 
66.33 
64.80 

51.57 
51.48 
48.39 

28.00 
42.73 
34.61 

Average, 

56.42 

47.88 

55.05 

65.57 

49.94 

38.67 

XXII. 
XXII. 

3 
3 

IV. 
VI. 

Heading,  second 

crop. 
Heading,  second 

crop. 

59.99 
59.37 

45.07 
40.27 

58.13 
61.40 

73.62 
72.76 

54.35 
53.52 

35.63 
35.32 

Average 

Average  of  all  of  above,      .... 

59.68 
57.49 

42.67 
50.11 

59.77     73.19 
57.96     68.19 

53.94 
50.98 

35.48 

28.66 

Results  at  Texas  Experiment  Station. 


Series. 

Period. 

Sheep. 

Character  of  Hay. 

Dry 

Matter. 

Ash. 

Pro- 
tein. 

Fiber. 

Nitro- 
gen-free 
Ex- 
tract. 

Fat. 

_ 

39 
60 
62 
73 

Iand2 
land  2 
land2 
land2 

Headed,  . 

Full  tassel. 

Headed,  blooming,. 

Late,    mixed    with 
crab  grass. 

- 

30.00 
23.50 
15.00 
32.20 

17.70 
58.30 
64.20 
57.30 

63.10 

58.60 
60.20 
62.80 

57.60 
41.80 
52.60 
59.60 

48.70 
45.20 
61.10 
61.10 

Average, 

Timothy  hay,  for  comparison 

Barnyard  millet,  well  headed,  .... 

55 
57 

24.80 
39.00 
63.00 

49.40 
48.00 
64.00 

61.20 
50.00 
62.00 

52.90 
62.00 
52.00 

54.00 
50.00 
46.00 

In  the  above  trials  an  effort  was  made  to  note  the  digestibility  of  Sudan 
grass  cut  at  successive  stages  of  growth.  The  results  do  not  indicate  any- 
particular  difference.  The  second  cutting  of  hay  appeared  to  be  more 
digestible  than  the  first.  Whether  this  would  hold  true  in  all  cases  is  of 
course  not  estabUshed.  It  is  just  thfe  opposite  from  the  results  secured 
with  the  green  Sudan  grass.  The  probability  is  that  much  will  depend 
upon  the  climatic  conditions  prevailing  during  gro^vth.  If  the  weather 
should  be  warm,  with  plenty  of  sunlight  and  moisture,  it  is  possible  that 
the  second  growth  would  fully  equal  and  perhaps  exceed  the  first  growi;h 
in  digestibility. 


DIGESTION   EXPERIMENTS   WITH    SHEEP. 


333 


Results  recently  reported'  from  the  Texas  Experiment  Station  are 
somewhat  below  those  secured  by  us,  at  least  in  case  of  the  fiber.  If  one 
should  eliminate  the  protein  coefficient  of  Period  39  the  remaining  protein 
coefficients  would  be  some  two  points  above  the  Massachusetts  figure. 

In  all  of  the  trials  one  notes  particularly  the  high  digestibility  of  the 
fiber  and  the  low  coefficients  secured  for  the  extract  matter  and  fat. 
This  holds  true  also  for  the  millet.  The  digestibility  of  Sudan  grass  is 
shown  to  be  above  that  for  timothy,  and  equal  to  barnyard  millet.  The 
difficulty  in  curing  satisfactorily  the  coarse  grasses,  of  which  Sudan  and 
millet  are  examples,  render  them  less  satisfactory  for  hay  than  that  ob- 
tained from  the  finer  grasses. 

Digestibility  of  Siveet  Clover. 

Sweet  clover  (Melilotus  Alba)  is  a  biennial  legume  found  quite  widely 
distributed  in  southern  Canada  and  the  United  States.  The  two  samples 
used  were  grown  on  the  experiment  station  grounds.  The  clover  was  fed 
green  to  the  sheep,  beginning  about  June  12  and  ending  June  26,  At  the 
close  of  the  trials  the  clover  was  budding  to  early  blossom,  and  the  lower 
portion  of  the  stalks  was  woody.  The  two  samples  averaged  84.50  per 
cent,  of  water,  and  in  dry  matter  contained  7.08  per  cent,  ash,  19.40  per 
cent,  protein,  30.29  per  cent,  fiber,  40.10  per  cent,  extract  matter  and  3.13 
per  cent.  ash.  The  green  clover  was  fed  with  hay,  and  the  rations  had  an 
average  nutritive  ratio  of  1 :6.4. 


Summary  of  Coefficients  of  Sweet  Clover 

Nitro- 

Series. 

Period. 

Sheep. 

Condition  of  Clover. 

Dry 
Matter. 

Ash. 

Pro- 
tein. 

Fiber. 

gen-free 
Ex- 
tract. 

Fat. 

XXI. 

14 

IV. 

Early  blossom, 

64.80 

47.93 

75.29 

60.56 

64.07 

49.91 

XXI. 

14 

VI. 

Early  blossom, 

73.30 

48.96 

78.58 

78.58 

74.00 

50.28 

Average 

69.05 

48.44 

76.93 

69.57 

69.03 

50.10 

XXII. 

16 

IX. 

Budding, 

66.67 

- 

76.44 

47.60 

.  65.96 

43.22 

XXII. 

16 

XI. 

Budding, 

72.61 

- 

81.98 

62.29 

71.00 

61.34 

Average 

69.64 

- 

79.21 

49.95 

68.48 

52.28 

Average  of  both  samples,    .... 

69.45 

48.45 

78.07 

59.76 

68.76 

51.19 

Alfalfa'  for  comparison, 

61.00 

- 

74.00 

42.00 

72.00 

38.00 

Clover'  for  comparison, 

66.00 

- 

67.00 

53.00 

78.00 

65.00 

'  Bulletin  No.  203,  1916. 


'  Henry  and  Morrison. 


334       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    181. 


s 

weet  Clover  Hay,  Wyoming  Stai 

ion,  Bulletin 

No.  78. 

Series. 

Period. 

Sheep. 

Condition  of  Clover. 

Dry 
Matter. 

Ash. 

Pro- 
tein. 

Fiber. 

Nitro- 
gen-free   p  . 
Ex-        *^'^- 
tract. 

- 

XIV. 

1.2,3 

Rank,  late  cut, 

60.88 

65.79 

75.46 

33.63 

72.04 

30.94 

Alfalfa '  hay  for  comparison,    .... 
Clover  1  hay  for  comparison,    .... 

60.00 
62.00 

45.00 
58.00 

74.00 
61.00 

46.00 
53.00 

70.00 
68.00 

28.00 
54.00 

1  Massachusetts  Station. 

Sheep  IV.  in  Series  XXI.,  and  Sheep  IX.  in  Series  XXII.  did  not  seem 
able  to  digest  the  clover  as  well  as  the  other  two  sheep.  The  slight 
variation  in  the  stage  of  gro\vth  of  the  clover  appeared  to  be  without 
influence  on  its  digestibility.  The  young  sheep  IX.  and  XI.  did  not 
digest  the  fiber  as  well  as  did  the  old  sheep  IV.  and  VI.  Sweet  clover  cut 
previous  to  blooming  appeared  to  be  quite  well  utilized,  and  showed 
rather  higher  coefficients  than  those  for  alfalfa  or  clover  cut  in  bloom.  The 
results  of  the  Wyoming  Station  with  sweet  clover  hay  cut  at  an  advanced 
stage  of  growth  indicate  that  with  the  exception  of  the  fiber  it  is  as  fully 
digestible  as  either  alfalfa  or  clover  hay. 


Table  VI.  —  Complete  Summary  of  the  Averages  of  All  Coeffi- 
cients, ARRANGED  ALPHABETICALLY. 


Ration. 

Niunber 

of 
Single 
Trials. 

Dry 

Matter. 

Ash. 

Pro- 
tein. 

Fiber. 

Nitro- 
gen-free 
Ex- 
tract. 

Fat. 

Alfalfa 

4 

57.74 

42  61 

71.78 

46.40 

66.12 

23.62 

Cabbage  (entire),    . 

2 

87.92 

56.97 

86.13 

91.03 

95.86 

69.72 

Cabbage  (heads),    . 

2 

97.83 

77.29 

76.54 

112.27 

102.32 

42.67 

Cabbage  (leaves),    . 

2 

74.12 

44.97 

63.80 

78.23 

84.34 

37.39 

Carrots,  . 

8 

100.95 

64.40 

89  05 

129.47 

104.75 

114.66 

Corn  bran. 

5 

80.59 

- 

43.77 

75.92 

85.15 

65.53 

Distillers'  grains,     . 

4 

66.54 

36.31 

77.05 

44.44 

67.38 

83.70 

English  hay  —  basal. 

23 

59.47 

36.31 

49.78 

64.10 

62.35 

46.34 

English  hay  and  gluten  feed — basal 

14 

66.59 

33.25 

66.39 

67.75 

69.91 

51.89 

English  hay,  potato  starch  anc 
gluten  meal  (Diamond)  —  basal 

English  hay  and  wheat  gluten  floui 
(to  note  effect  of  the  flour). 

Feterita,           .... 

6 
5 
2 

73.27 
58.00 
74.51 

20.16 
43.00 

72.98 
44.00 
50.67 

63.54 
62.00 

80.67 
61.00 

87.76 

37.16 
43.00 
58.70 

Gluten  feed,    .... 

16 

91.59 

152.58 

85.44 

142  41 

93  77 

64.41 

DIGESTION    EXPERIMENTS    WITH    SHEEP. 


335 


Table  VI.  —  Complete  Summary  of  the  Averages  of  All  Coeffi- 
cients, ARRANGED  ALPHABETICALLY  —  Concluded. 


Ration. 

Number 

of 
Single 
Trials. 

Dry 

Matter. 

Ash. 

Pro- 
tein. 

Fiber. 

Nitro- 
gen-free 
Ex- 
tract. 

Fat. 

Gluten  meal  (Diamond), ' 

6 

86.00 

- 

85  00 

100.00 

93.00 

- 

Mangels, 

4 

87.07 

30.58 

50.94 

95.54 

94.76 

- 

New  Bedford  garbage  tankage, 

3 

79.22 

73.64 

37.60 

131.30 

89.60 

123  50 

New  Bedford  pig  meal,  . 

2 

69.14 

44.49 

69.37 

22.32 

83.71 

138.33 

Pumpkins  (entire). 

7 

80.69 

65  40 

76.61 

61.05 

88.69 

91.60 

Pumpkins  (seeds  removed),  . 

2 

101.54 

82.31 

93.26 

116.34 

105.72 

92.63 

Rowen, 

2 

60.99 

34.40 

60.33 

68.10 

63.47 

32.27 

Soy  bean  hay,         .... 

2 

56.65 

20.44 

74.88 

52.56 

59.75 

59.31 

Stevens'  "44"  Dairy  Ration, 

2 

70.57 

26.03 

79.69 

50.19 

70.91 

81.48 

Sudan  grass  (green). 

4 

69.64 

47.30 

72.42 

75.56 

68.50 

72.54 

Sudan  hay 

8 

57.49 

50.11 

57.96 

68.19 

50.98 

28.66 

Sweet  clover  (green), 

4 

69.45 

48.45 

78.07 

57.76 

68.76 

51.19 

Turnips, 

2 

88.98 

53  36 

75.62 

81.65 

96.06 

66.38 

Vegetable  ivory  meal, 

8 

88.33 

78.42 

18.47 

85.52 

93.84 

49.18 

Vinegar  grains 

4 

60.70 

- 

64.42 

58.10 

55  97 

82.57 

1  See  page  312. 


INDEX. 


INDEX. 


PAGE 

Advanced  registry,  testing  of  pure-bred  cows  for,         .  ,  .  .  .     48a 

Agricultural  production,  census  of,     .......  .     19a 

Alfalfa,  digestion  coefficients,    .........     319 

Antirrhinum,  rust  on,       ..........     37a 

Bacillary  white  diarrhoea,  testing  of  fowl  for,       ......     61a 

Bacterium  jndlorum  infection,  investigations  relative  to,        .  .  .  .     62a 

Barium-Phosphate,  vegetation  tests  with,  ......     43o 

Bean  diseases,  anthracnose,       .........     34a 

Stem  and  root  rots,  ..........     34a 

Beans,  spraying  experiments  with,     .......       34a,  36a 

Blueberry  culture  at  the  cranberry  substation,    ......     183 

Bulletin  No.  173.     The  cost  of  distributing  milk  in  six  cities  and  towns  in 

Massachusetts,     .........         1 

Bulletin  No.  174.     The    composition,    digestibility    and    feeding    value    of 
pumpkins,   .......... 

Bulletin  No.  175.     Mosaic  disease  of  tobacco,     ...... 

Bulletin  No.  176.     The  cause  of  the  injurious  effect  of  sulfate  of  ammonia 
when  used  as  a  fertilizer,        ....... 

Bulletin  No.  177.     Potato  plant  lice  and  their  control,  .... 

Bulletin  No.  178.     The  European  corn  borer,  Pyrausta  nubilalis  Hilbner,  a 
recently  established  pest  in  Massachusetts,      .... 

Bulletin  No.  179.     The   greenhouse   red    spider   attacking   cucumbers,    and 
methods  for  its  control,  ....... 

Bulletin  No.  180.     Report  of  the  cranberry  substation  for  1916;    and  ob- 
servations on  the  spoilage  of  cranberries  due  to  lack  of  proper 
ventilation,  .... 

Bulletin  No.  181.     Digestion  experiments  with  sheep. 
Butter  fat,  determination  of  fatty  acids, 
Cabbages,  digestion  coefficients. 
Carrots,  digestion  coefficients,  . 
Celery  diseases,        .... 

Spraying  experiments. 
Chemical  work,  numerical  summary. 
Chrysanthemum  gall  midge. 
Control  work,  .... 

Dairy  law,         .... 

Feeding  stuffs  law,    . 
Feed  law  account. 
Fertilizer  law,  .... 

Fertilizer  account, 
Corn  borer,  European, 

Character  of  injury  by. 
Control,  ..... 

Necessity  for  co-operation. 
Description,      .... 

Discovery  and  identification. 
History  in  Europe,     . 


5.5 

73 


119 
135 


147 


153 


183 
241 
39a 
319 
321 
36a 
36a 
50a 
51a 
11a 
44a 
43a 
12a 
41a 
11a 
147 
150 
151 
152 
148 
147 
148 


340 


INDEX. 


Corn  borer —  Concluded. 

In  Massachusetts,  food  plants, 
Importance, 
Importation, 
Present  distribution. 
Life  history  and  habits. 
Corn  bran,  digestion  coefficients. 
Cost  of  distributing  milk  in  six  cities  and  towns  in  Massachusetts, 
Cows,  pure-bred,  testing  for  advanced  registry,  ..... 

Cranberries,  observations  on  the  spoilage  of,  due  to  lack  of  proper  ventila- 
tion,  .......... 

Effect  of  carbon  dioxide  on  cranberries,        ..... 

Effect  of  carbon  dioxide  on  fungi  in  the  berries,    .... 

Effect  of  different  relative  humidities  on  .spoilage  due  to  carbon  dioxide 

Relation  of  fungi  to  spoilage  due  to  carbon  dioxide. 

Temperature  tests  in  open  and  closed  cans,  .... 

Cranberry,  composition  of,  and  its  relations  to  storage  and  decay. 
Cranberry  substation,  Wareham,  accounts. 

Report  for  1916 

Blueberry  culture. 
Bog  management. 

Injury  to  bogs  by  fall  army  worm. 
Injury  to  bogs  from  late  holding  of  winter  flowage. 
Portable  bridge  for  carting  berries  across  bog  ditches, 
Sanding  rim,  value  of. 
Fertilizers,     .  .  . 

Frost  protection,    . 

Temperature  at  which  freezing  of  ripened  berries  begins. 
Fungous  diseases,  ..... 

Control  by  use  of  copper  sulfate  in  the  flowage 
"False  blossom,"         ..... 

Spraying,  effects  of,     . 

With  arsenate  of  lead,      .  . 

With  Black-Leaf  40  and  resin  fish-oil  soap. 
With  Bordeaux  mixture. 
Insects,  black-head  fireworm, 
Cranberry  fruit  worm. 
Parasitism, 
Submergence  tests, 
Cranberry  rootworm, 
Cranberry  tip  worm,  . 
Gyp.sy  moth, 
Resanding,    . 
Storage  tests. 

Berries  separated  with  Hayden  and  with  White  machines  and  berries 

screened  without  separating  compared  as  to  keeping  quality, 
Effect  of  admixtures  of  vines  and  leaves  on  keeping. 
Effect  of  grading  on  the  keeping  of  cranberries, 
Hand-picking  v.  scoop-picking  as  affecting  keeping  quality. 
Housing  promptly  v.  leaving  crates  in  the  sun  on  the  bog  as  affect 
ing  keeping,  ........ 

Humidity  records,       ........ 

Incubator  test  of  keeping  quality  of  cranberries,     . 

Injury   to    keeping   quality   caused    by   separators   employing    the 

bouncing  principle  and  by  the  drop  in  the  barrel. 
Relative  development  of  decay  in  different  periods  of  the  storage 
season, 


P.\GE 

149 
149 
148 
149 
150 
316 
1 
48a 

235 
237 
239 
238 
238 
236 
40a 
14a 
183 
183 
232 
232 
232 
233 
233 
222 
184 
186 
186 
192 
192 
186 
191 
190 
187 
226 
227 
228 
230 
223 
226 
224 
218 
193 

206 
206 
208 
197 

200 
194 
216 

208 

214 


INDEX. 


341 


l^ranberry  substation  —  Concluded. 
Report  for  1916  —  Concluded. 

Storage  tests  —  Concluded.  page 

Relative  effect  of  barrel  and  crate  containers  on  cranberry  keeping 
in  shipments,        ...... 

Relative  keeping  quality  of  upper  and  under  berries, 
Temperature  of  berries  when  picked, 
Temperature  records,  ..... 

Tentative  practical  conclusions  based  on  results  of  the  storage  tests. 
Preparation  for  shipment. 
Storage  previous  to  shipment,  . 
Weight  shrinkage  in  storage. 

Wet  and  dry  cranberries  compared  as  to  keeping. 
Weather  observations,    ..... 

Creameries  visited  in  1917,        ..... 

Cucumbers,  the  greenhouse  red  spider  attacking, 
Cultures  for  legumes,        ...... 

Dairy  law,  examination  for  certificates, 

Inspection  of  glassware,      ..... 

Inspection  of  machines  and  apparatus, 
Diamond  gluten  meal,  digestion  coefficients. 

Diamond  gluten  meal,  potato  starch  and  English  hay,  digestion  coefficients. 
Digestion  experiments  with  sheep,     ...... 

Digestion  coefficients  of  basal  rations,  .... 

Digestion  coefficients,  complete  summary,  arranged  alphabetically 
Computation  of,    .......  . 

Discussion  of  results  with  summaries  of  coefficients. 
Alfalfa, 
Cabbages, 
Carrots, 
Corn  bran,    . 
Diamond  gluten  meal, 

Diamond  gluten  meal,  English  hay  and  potato  starch  (basal), 
Distillers'  grains,     ........ 

English  hay  (basal),         ....... 

English  hay  and  gluten  feed  (basal),  .... 

English  hay,  potato  starch  and  Diamond  gluten  meal  (basal), 
Feterita,        ......... 

Garbage  tankage.  New  Bedford,       .  .  .  .        '  . 

Gluten  feed,  earlier  experiments,      ..... 

Present  experiments,  ....... 

Gluten  feed  and  English  hay  (basal),        .... 

Mangels,        ......... 

Pig  meal.  New  Bedford,  ...... 

Potato  starch,  English  hay  and  Diamond  gluten  meal  (basal). 
Pumpkins,  entire,  ....... 

Minus  seeds  and  connecting  tissue,        .... 

Roots  and  vegetables,  comparative  summary  of  coefficients, 

Rowen, 

Soy  bean  hay. 


Stevens  "44"  Dairy  Ration, 

Sudan  grass, 

Sudan  hay,    . 

Sweet  clover, 

Turnips, 

Vegetable  ivory  meal, 

Vinegar  grains, 


212 
199 
195 
194 
216 
217 
217 
194 
201 
183 
45a 
153 
55a 
44a 
44a 
45a 
312 
309 
39a,  241 
.  263 
.  335 
.  265 
.  306 
.  319 
.  319 
.  321 
.  316 
.  312 
.  309 
.  317 
.  307 
.  308 
.  309 
.  318 
.  327 
.  311 
.  310 
.  308 
.  322 
.  328 
.  309 
.  323 
.  323 
.  325 
.  328 
.  329 
.  329 
.  330 
.  331 
.  333 
.  324 
.  325 
.  326 


342 


INDEX. 


Digestion  experiments  with  sheep  —  Concluded.  page 

Feces,  composition  of,         ........          .  249 

Feedstuffs,  composition,     .          .          .          ,          .          .          .          .          .  242 

Water  consumed,       ..........  256 

Weight  of  animals,    ..........  256 

Wheat  gluten  flour,  effect  of,  on  digestibility  of  hay,     ....  314 

Distillers'  grains,  digestion  coefficients,       .......  317 

Egg  production,       ...........  57a 

Broodiness,       ...........  58a 

Hatching  quality  of  eggs,  .........  59a 

Raising  chicks  on  clean  ground,            .......  59a 

Winter  cycle  of,         .........          .  57a 

European  corn  borer,        .........       53a,  147 

Feeding  stuffs  law,  change  in,   .          .          .          .          .          .          .          .          .  44a 

Feed  law  account,   ...........  12a 

Fertilizer  experiments,  Barium-Phosphate,           ......  43a 

Chemical. fertilizers  and  manure  for  market-garden  crops  (Field  C),         .  24a 

Comparison  of  muriate  and  high-grade  sulfate  of  potash  (Field  B),          .  23a 

Comparison  of  phosphates,          ........  28a 

Comparison  of  potash  salts  (Field  G),           .          .          .          .          .          .  26a 

Cranberry  substation,         .........  222 

Fertilizers  for  corn,  comparison  (North  Corn  Acre),       ....  29a 

Nature's  Wonder  Mineral  Plant  Food,  vegetation  tests  with,           .          .  43a 

Nitrogen  experiments  (Field  A),           .......  21a 

Soil  tests 29a,  30a 

Sulfate  of  ammonia  v.  nitrate  of  soda  as  a  top-dressing  for  hay,      .          .  32a 

Yields  of  hay  with  different  top-dressings  (Grass  Plots),          .          .          .  31a 

Fertilizer  law  account,      .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .11a 

Fertilizers  collected  and  analyzed,      ........  41a 

Registered,        ...........  41a 

Feterita,  digestion  coefficients,            ........  318 

Food  and  feed  consumption,  survey  of,       ......          .  19a 

Frost  injury  to  crops,        ..........  35a 

Fruit  crop  diseases,  apple  scab,           ........  35a 

Brown  rot,        ...........  35a 

Peach  leaf  curl,          .          .          .          .          .          .          .          .          .          .  34a 

Fruits,  tree  and  leaf  characters  in  varieties  of ,     .          .          .          .          .          .  54a 

Garbage  tankage,  New  Bedford,  digestion  coefficients,           ....  327 

Gluten  feed,  digestion  coefficients,     .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .310 

Gluten  feed  and  English  hay,  digestion  coefficients,      .....  308 

Gluten  meal.  Diamond,  digestion  coefficients,      ......  312 

Graves'  Orchard  account,          .          .          .          .          .          ...          .          .  13a 

Green-striped  maple  worm  injuring  foliage,          ......  52a 

Hay,  English,  digestion  coefficients,  ........  307 

Hay,  English,  and  gluten  feed,  digestion  coefficients,   .....  308 

Hay,    English,    potato    starch    and    Diamond    gluten   meal,    digestion    co- 
efficients,    ..........  309 

Hay,  sulfate  of  ammonia  v.  nitrate  of  soda  as  a  top-dressing  for,  .          .          .  32a 

Hay,  yields  with  different  top-dressings,     .......  31a 

Hog  cholera,  value  of  anti-hog  cholera  serum  in  the  prevention  of,         .          .  63a 

Insecticides,  chemical  work  with,       ........  40a 

Insects  common  in  1917,            .........  52a 

Chrysanthemum  gall  midge,        ........  51a 

Cranberry,         ...........  223 

European  corn  borer,  .  .  .  .  .  .  .       53a,  147 

Green-striped  maple  worm,  injuring  foliage,           .....  52a 

Onion  fly,  control,     ..........  52a 

Potato  plant  louse,    .  ,  ,  ,         ;  .  .  .  .       52a,  135 


INDEX. 


343 


Insects  common  in  1917  —  Concluded. 

Red  spider,  greenhouse,      ....... 

Rose  chafer,      ......... 

Two-lined  prominent  moth,  larvae  of,  .... 

Inspection  of  imported  nursery  stock,         ..... 

Ivory  meal,  vegetable,  digestion  coefficients,        .... 

Lawn  grass,  disease  of,      .......  . 

Legumes,  cultures  for,       ........ 

Light,  response  of  plants  to,      ....... 

Lime  and  soil  acidity,  relations  between,    ..... 

Mailing  lists,  ......... 

Mangels,  digestion  coefficients,  ...... 

Market-garden  crops,  chemical  fertilizers  and  manure  for  (Field  C), 
Yields  per  acre,  1917,  ....... 

Market-garden  field  station,  experimental  work  started. 

Market  milk  investigation,        ....... 

Marketing  investigations,  cost  of  milk  distribution. 

Tobacco,  ......... 

Milk,  cost  of  distributing  in  six  cities  and  towns  in  Massachusetts, 
Cost  of  collection  and  distribution  of  wholesale  milk  in  cans. 

Motor  truck  delivery. 
Cost  of  delivery  of  special  milk, 
Cost  of  distribution  of  cream. 
Costs,  analysis  of,      . 

Capital,  working,  .... 

Depreciation,  .... 

Buildings,  .... 

Equipment,         .... 

Harness,    ..... 

Horses,      ..... 

Wagons  and  sleighs,    . 
Investment,  .... 

Labor,  ..... 

Maintenance,  .... 

Costs  by  localities,    .... 

Amherst  v.  Walpole, 
Haverhill  v.  Pittsfield,     . 
Springfield  v.  Worcester, 
Costs  classified  by  size  and  kind  of  business. 
Costs,  difficulty  of  obtaining  data, 

percentage  analysis  in  relation  to  size  of  business. 
Cream,  cost  of  distributing. 
Disadvantages  of  competitive  distribution, 
Bad  debts,    ..... 

Duplication  in  routes,     . 

Long  hauls  uneconomical, 

Long-distance  shipments, 

Loss  of  bottles,       .... 

Overcapitalization, 

Shrinkage,     ..... 

Small  deliveries  per  horse. 
Surplus  and  spoilage. 
Distribution  by  producer  and  by  dealer  compared. 
Individual  variations  in  cost  of  distributing. 
Investigation,  scope  of,       . 

Investment  and  size  of  business,  relation  between. 
Processing  and  delivery  costs,     .... 

Summary,     ....... 


PAGE 

153 

51a 

52a 

52a 

325 

37a 

55a 

37a 

40a 

7a 

322 

24a 

25a 

54a 

20a 

1 

19a 

1 

43 

44 

43 

45 

10 

12 

10 

11 

11 

11 

10 

11 

10 

12 

12 

22 

27 

29 

30 

14 

9 

20 

45 

50 

51 

52 

50 

52 

51 

50 

51 

50 

51 

39 

45 

3 

15 

8 

13 


344 


INDEX. 


Milk  —  Concluded. 

Suggestions  for  improvement, 
Accounts, 

Central  milk  plants, 
Co-operative  delivery,    . 
Large  deliveries  per  horse. 
Standardizing  distribution. 
Ticket  system. 
Milk  depots  visited  in  1917, 
Inspectors  visited  in  1917, 
Market,  investigations, 
Studies  in,         . 
Mosaic  disease  of  tobacco, 
Bacteria  in  relation  to, 
Biochemical  studies. 

Causal  agent,  probable  character  of. 
Activity,    . 
Size, 

Temperature,  effect  on. 
Enzyme  activities  in  healthy  and  diseased  plants, 
Catalase,   . 
Chlorophyllase, 
Diastase,   . 

Oxidases  and  peroxidases. 
Mosaic  sap,  reaction  of,  with  various  substances. 
Drying, 
Filtration, 

Resistance  to  antiseptics. 
Contagious  nature  of. 
Control,  prevention  and,    . 
Description, 
Dissemination  agents, 
Insects, 

Seed,    .... 
Workmen, 
Economic  importance, 
Fertilization  in  relation  to. 
Fungi  in  relation  to. 
Historical  summary, 
Infection  from  seedbed, 
Infectious  nature  of. 
Light,  colored,  effect  on,    . 
Experiments  at  this  station. 
Discussion  of  results. 
With  blue  cloth. 
With  orange  cloth. 
With  red  cloth, 
Work  of  Lodewijks, 
Lime,  effect  on, 
Occurrence, 
Pathological  anatomy, 
Leaves, 
Roots, 
Stems, 
Prevention  and  control, 
Care  in  handling,  . 


PAGE 

53 

53 

53 

53 

53 

53 

53 

45a 

46a 

20a 

56a 

73 

86 

96 

110 

111 

110 

110 

96 

97 

103 

101 

103 

105 

106 

106 

107 

82 

113, 

78 ' 

87 

87 

89 

88 

81 

90 

85 

74 

80 

81 

91 

92 

95 

91 

94 

93 

91 

90 

80 

83 

83 

85 

84 

113 

116 


INDEX. 


o4o 


Mosiac  disease  of  tobacco  —  Concluded. 
Prevention  and  control  —  Concluded 
Seedbed,  changing  location  of, 
Seedbed  sterilization, 
With  formalin,    . 
With  steam, 
Summary,         .  .  .  . 

Mycological  collection,  reorganization  of 
Nature's  Wonder  Mineral  Plant  Food,  vegetation  test 
Needs  for  development  of  station, 
Nitrogen  experiment  (Field  A), 

Yields  per  acre,  1917, 
Olive  oil,  effect  of  air,  light  and  moisture. 
Onion  diseases,         ..... 
Fly,  control  of,  .... 

Orchard,  experimental,  started  in  Buckland, 
Peach  breeding,  studies  in,         . 
Phosphates,  comparison  of,        . 

Yields  per  acre,  1917, 
Pig  meal.  New  Bedford,  digestion  coefficients, 
Plant  disease  survey,         .... 
Plant  diseases,  prevalence  in  1917, 

Apple  scab,       ..... 
Bean  anthracnose,     .... 

Stem  and  root  rot, 
Brown  rot,        .  .  .  .  . 

Celery  blight,  ..... 
Crown  rot,  ..... 
Root  rot,       .  .  .  .  . 

Cranberry,  fungous  diseases  of,  . 
Lawn  grass,  disease  of,        . 
Mildew  of  cucumbers, 
Mosaic  disease  of  tobacco, 
Onion  blight,    . 

Root  rot. 
Peach  leaf  curl, 
Potato  blight,  . 
Rhizoctonia, 
Scab,    . 
Rose  canker,     . 
Rust  on  Antirrhinum, 
Plants,  response  to  light, 
Potash,  comparison  of  muriate  and  high-grade  sulfate 
Salts,  comparison  of  (Field  G), 
Yields  per  acre,  1917, 
Potato  diseases  in  1917,    . 
Potato  plant  lice  and  their  control. 
Control  measures, 

Summary, 
Control,  natural  agents  in, 
Description, 
Economic  importance, 
Life  cycle. 
Nature  of  injury, 
Period  of  injury, 
Spraying  apparatus  for, 


with, 


(Field  B), 


PAGE 
115 
115 

115 
115 
117 
38a 
4.3a 
8a 
21a 
22a 
39a 
34a 
52a 
54a 
54a 
28a 
28a 
328 
38a 

33a,  35a 
35a 
34a 
34a 
35a 
35a 
35a 
35a 
186 
37a 
35a 
73 
34a 
34a 
34a 
33a 
34a 
34a 
36a 
37a 
37a 
23a 
26a 
27a 
33a 
135 
137 
144 

138,  145 
136 
135 
137 
136 
135 
143 


346 


INDEX. 


Potato  plant  lice  and  their  control  —  Concluded. 

PAGE 

Trials  of  contact  insecticides  for  the  control  of,     .          .          .          . 

139 

Black-leaf  40 

.     140 

Black-leaf  40  and  Pyrox,          .          . 

.     141 

Fish-oil  or  whale-oil  soaps,       ....... 

.     142 

Kerosene  emulsion,          ........ 

.     142 

Lime-sulfur,            ......... 

.     143 

Miscible  or  soluble  oils,            ....... 

.     143 

Nico-fume  liquid,             ........ 

.     141 

Potato  plant  louse,  prevalence  in  1917,       ...... 

52a 

Potato  starch,  English  hay  and  Diamond  gluten  meal,  digestion  coefficients 

309 

Publications  in  1917,         .          .          .          .          .          ... 

.       6a 

Pumpkins,  composition,  digestibility  and  feeding  value. 

.       55 

Composition  of,          ........          . 

.       57 

Digestibility  of,          ........          . 

.       62 

Feeding  experiments  with,           .          .          .          . 

.       66 

Feeding  to  milch  cows,       ........ 

.       67 

Summary,          .......... 

.       55 

Pumpkins,  digestion  coefficients,  ........ 

.     323 

.     147 

Red  spider,  greenhouse,    ......... 

.     153 

Bibliography,    .......... 

181 

Enemies,            .......... 

160 

Food  plants,     .......... 

155 

History  and  distribution,   .          .          .          .          .          . 

.     154 

Summary,          .......... 

180 

Red  spider,  greenhouse,  attacking  cucumbers,     ..... 

153 

Control  measures,      ......... 

172 

Preventive,   .......... 

172 

Artificial  dispersion,  elimination  of,        ....          . 

174 

Destruction  of  outside  sources  of  infestation. 

173 

Grass  borders,  methods  of  exterminating,  .... 

174 

Fumigation,        ......... 

173 

174 

Spraying,  .......... 

175 

178 

Linseed  oil  emulsion,  preparation  of,            .... 

175 

Methods 

176 

Outfits, 

176 

Time  of  applications,        ....... 

177 

Dispersion,  artificial,           ........ 

159 

Natural,         .......... 

159 

Economic  importance,        ........ 

156 

Feeding  habits,           ......... 

159 

Fumigation  experiments,    ........ 

161 

Benzene  or  benzol,           ........ 

162 

Carbon  bisulfid,     ......... 

162 

162 

Sulfur  dioxide,        .......... 

161 

Life  history,      ........... 

157 

Materials  efficient  for  control,  summary,      ...... 

169 

Nature  of  injury,       .......... 

156 

Prevention,       ........... 

172 

Spraying  experiments  in  commercial  greenhouses,           .          .          .          . 

169 

Conclusions,            .......... 

172 

Lemon  oil,     .......... 

170 

Linseed  oil  emulsion,       ........ 

170 

INDEX. 


347 


Red  spider,  greenhouse,  attacking  cucumbers  —  Concluded 
Spraying  experiments  in  the  laboratory. 
Adhesive  sprays,  flour  paste,  . 

Soap,  ..... 

Oil  sprays :  — 

Petroleum,  Arlington  oil, 

Arlington  oil  and  Black-leaf  40, 
Kerosene  emulsion. 
Vegetable,  lemon  oil,  . 

Experiments  on  duplication  of  lemon  oil. 
Linseed  oil  emulsion. 
Action  on  mites. 
Sulfur  and  compounds  of  sulfur. 
Barium  sulfur,    .... 
Calcium  sulfid,   .... 
Lime-sulfur  and  Nico-fume  liquid. 
Potassium  sulfid. 
Sodium  sulfid,    . 
Sulfur,  drj% 
Sulfur,  liquid. 
Sulfur,  soluble,  . 
Water, 
Red  spider,  greenhouse,  attacking  other  crops, 

Violets,    . 
Report  of  director. 

Treasurer, 
Reports  of  departments :  — 
Agricultural  economics. 
Agriculture, 
Botany,   . 
Chemistry, 
Entomology,     . 
Horticulture,    . 
Microbiology,   . 
Poultry  husbandry,  . 
Veterinary  science,    . 
Roots  and  vegetables,  comparative  digestion  coefficients, 
Rose  canker,  control  of,    . 
Chafer,  a  serious  pest, 
Rowen,  digestion  coefficients,    . 
Seeds,  purity  and  germination  tests, 
Sheep,  digestion  experiments  with, 
Soil  fertility,  studies  in,    . 

Tests,       .... 

Yield  of  cabbage,  1917  (North  Soil  Test), 
Yields  of  corn,  1915  and  1917  (South  Soil  Test) 
Soy  bean  hay,  digestion  coefficients. 
Station:  — 

Essentials  for  needed  development, 
Buildings, 

Land,  poultry  farm, 
Tillson  farm, 
Tuxbury  land,    . 
Men  for  new  lines  of  work. 
Maintenance,   . 

Staff 

Changes  in,  . 


PAGE 

163 
163 

164 

165 
166 
166 
166 
166 
168 
168 
164 
165 
165 
165 
164 
165 
164 
164 
165 
163 
179 
179 
3a 
17a 

19a 
21a 
33a 
39a 
51a 
54a 
55a 
57a 
61a 
325 
36a 
51a 
328 
38a 
241 
55a 
29a,  30a 
30a 
31a 
329 

8a 


8a 
9a 
5a 
la 
3a 


348 


INDEX. 


Station  —  Conchided. 
Work  of  the  year, 

Asparagus,  rust-resistant, 
Control  work, 
New  lines  of  work, 
Blueberry  culture, 
Experiments  in  feeding  horses. 
Experiments  to  determine  minimum  protein  requirements  of 

ing  animals,  ..... 

Experiments  with  small  grains  in  Massachusetts, 
Investigation  of  forage  crops  new  to  Massachusetts, 
Soy  beans  grown  for  seed, 
Tobacco  sickness,  progress  in  the  study  of, 
Stevens  "44"  Dairy  Ration, 
Storage  of  cranberries, 
Sudan  grass,  digestion  coefficients, 
Sudan  hay,  digestion  coefficients, 
Sulfate  of  ammonia,  cause  of  injurious  efTect,  when  used  as  a  fertilizer. 
Chemical  investigations, 
Soil  used.  Field  A, 
.Ohio, 

Pennsylvania,     . 
Rhode  Island,     . 
Composition  of  roots  and  tops  of  grass  and  clover  from  Field  A, 
Pot  cultures  with  soils  from  Field  A,  . 
Water  cultures,  extracts  from  soils  of  Field  A, 
Standard  nutrient  solutions,    . 
Survey  of  food  and  feed  consumption. 
Sweet  clover,  digestion  coefficients,    . 
Tillson  Farm  account. 
Tobacco  investigations,  account, 
Marketing  investigations. 
Mosaic  disease  of. 
Tobacco-sick  soils,  study  of. 
Trees,  injury  by  insects,  . 
Truck  crop  diseases. 

Extension  specialist  in. 
Turnips,  digestion  coefficients. 

Two-lined  prominent  moth,  larvae  of,  injuring  foliage. 
Variety  test  work,  alfalfa. 
Potatoes, 

Soy  beans,         ..... 
Winter  wheat,  .... 

Vegetable  ivory  meal,  digestion  coefficients, 
Vegetation  tests,      ..... 
Vinegar  grains,  digestion  coefficients. 
Water,  analysis  of,  .... 

Wheat  gluten  flour,  effect  of,  on  digestibility  of  hay, 
Work  of  the  year  1917,     ..... 


PAGE 

9a 

10a 

11a 

9a 

9a 

10a 


grow- 


Public  Document 


No.  31 


THIRTY-FIRST  ANNUAL  REPORT 

OK  THE 

MASSACHUSETTS  AGRICULTURAL 
EXPERIMENT   STATION 


Parts  I  and  II 


Being    Parts   III  and    IV    of   the    Fifty-sixth    Annual   Report 
OF  THE  Massachusetts  Agricultural  College 


January.    1919 


Ending  the  Thirty-sixth  Year  from  the  Founding  of  the  State 
Agricultural  Experiment  Station 


BOSTON 
WRIGHT  &  POTTER  PRINTING  CO.,  STATE  PRINTERS 
32   DERNE   STREET 
1919 


I 


Public  Document 


No.  31 


THIRTY-FIRST  ANNUAL  REPORT 

OF  THE 

MASSACHUSETTS  AGRICULTURAL 
EXPERIMENT   STATION 


Parts  I  and  II 


Being    Parts    III   and    IV    of    the    Fifty-sixth    Annual   Report 
OF  THE  Massachusetts  Agricultural  College 


January,   1919 


Ending  the  Thirty-sixth  Year  from  the  Founding  of  the  State 
Agricultural  Experiment  Station 


BOSTON 
WRIGHT   &   POTTER  PRINTING   CO.,  STATE  PRINTERS 
32   DERNE   STREET 
1919 


Publication  of  this  Document 

approved  by  the 
Supervisor  of  Administration. 


THIRTY-FIRST  ANNUAL  REPORT 

OF  THE 

Massachusetts 
Agricultural  Experiment  Station. 


Part  I. 

REPORT    OF  THE  DIRECTOR  AND   OTHER    OFFICERS. 


Part  II. 

DETAILED   REPORT   OF  THE  EXPERIMENT  STATION. 


A  Record  of  the  Thirty-sixth  Year  from  the  Founding  of  the  State  AGRictrLruEAL 

Experiment  Station. 


CONTENTS. 


Part  I. 

Officers  and  staff,     . 
Report  of  the  director, 
Report  of  the  treasurer,    . 

United  States  appropriations, 

State  appropriations. 
Report  of  the  department  of  agricultural  economics, 
Report  of  the  department  of  agriculture,    . 

Top-dressing  permanent  mowings, 
Report  of  the  department  of  botany. 
Report  of  the  department  of  chemistry, 

Research  section,       ..... 

Fertilizer  section,       ..... 

Feed  and  dairy  section,      .... 

Numerical  summary  of  laboratory  work. 
Report  of  the  department  of  entomology,  . 
Report  of  the  department  of  horticulture. 

Work  in  pomology,    ..... 

Work  at  the  market-garden  field  station. 
Report  of  the  department  of  microbiology. 
Report  of  the  department  of  poultry  husbandry. 
Report  of  the  department  of  veterinary  science, 

Blood  test  of  fowls,   ..... 

Bacterium  pullorum  studies, 

Hog  cholera  investigations. 


PAGE 

la 
3a 
10a 
10a 
11a 
12a 
13a 
14a 
20a 
27a 
27o 
29a 
32a 
38a 
39a 
Ma 
44a 
46a 
48a 
50a 
52a 
53a 
55a 
55a 


Part  II, 

Bulletin  No.  182.    Soy  beans  as  human  food,      ..... 

Bulletin  No.  183.    Rose  canker  and  its  control,  .... 

Bulletin  No.  184.     Late  dormant  versus  delayed  dormant  or  green  tip  treat- 
ment for  the  control  of  apple  aphids,       ...... 

Bulletin  No.  185.    Inheritance  of  seed  coat  color  in  garden  beans, 

Bulletin  No.  186:  — 

Part    I.     The  composition,  digestibility  and  feeding  value  of  alfalfa, 
Part  II.     The  value  of  corn  bran  for  milk  production. 

Bulletin  No.  187.    The  clarification  of  milk,        ..... 

Bulletin  No.  188.    The  nutrition  of  the  horse,     ..... 


1 
11 

47 
59 

105 
142 
155 
243 


IVIassachusetts  Agricultural  Experiment  Station. 


OFFICERS  AND  STAFF. 


Trustees. 


COMMITTEE. 

Charles  H.  Pheston,  Chairman, 
Wilfrid  Wheeler, 
Edmund  Mortimer, 
Arthur  G.  Pollard, 
Harold  L.  Frost, 

The  President  of  the  College,  ex  officio 
The  Director  of  the  Station,  ex  officio 


Hathorne. 

Concord. 

Grafton. 

Lowell. 

Arlington. 


STATION  STAFF. 

Administration.  Fred  W.  Morse,  M.Sc,  Acting  Director. 

Joseph  B.  Lindsey,  Ph.D.,  Vice-Director. 
Fred  C.  Kenney,  Treasurer. 
Charles  R.  Green,  B.Agr.,  Librarian. 
Mrs.  Lucia  G.  Church,  Clerk. 
Miss  F.  Ethel  Felton,  A.B.,  Clerk. 


Agricultural 
Economics. 


Alexander  E.  Cance,  Ph.D.,  In  Charge  of  Department. 


Agriculture. 


Consulting  Agriculturist. 

In  Charge  of  Cranberry  Investi- 


WiLLiAM  P,  Brooks,  Ph.D. 
Henry  J.  Franklin,  Ph.D. 

gations. 
Edwin  F.  Gaskill,  B.Sc,  Assistant  Agriculturist 
Robert  L.  Coffin,  Assistant. 


Botany. 


A.  Vincent  Osmun,  M.Sc,  Botanist. 

George  H.  Chapman,  Ph.D.,  Research  Physiologist. 

Paul  J.  Anderson,  Ph.D.,  Associate  Plant  Pathologist. 

Orton  L.  Clark,  B.Sc,  Assistant  Plant  Physiologist. 

Webster  S.  Krout,  M.A.,  Field  Pathologist. 

Mrs.  S.  W.  Wheeler,  B.Sc,  Curator. 

Miss  Ellen  L.  Welch,  A.B.,  Clerk. 


2a  EXPERIMENT  STATION. 

Entomolcgy.  Henry  T.  Fernald,  Ph.D.,  Entomologist. 

Arthur  I.  Bourne,  A.B.,  Assistant  Entomologist. 
Miss  Bridie  E.  O'Donnell,  Clerk. 


[Jan. 


Borticultvire.  Frank  A.  Waugh.i  M.Sc,  Horticulturist. 

Fred  C.  Sears,  M.Sc,  Pomologist. 
Jacob  K.  Shaw,  -'  Ph.D.,  Research  Pomologist. 
Harold  F.  Tompson,  B.Sc,  Market  Gardener. 
Miss  Etheltn  Streeter,  Clerk. 


Meteorology. 
Microbiology. 


John  E.  Ostrander,  A.M.,  C.E.,  Meteorologist. 


Charles  E.  Marshall,  Ph.D.,  In  Charge  of  Department. 
Arao  Itano,  Ph.D.,  Assistant  Professor  of  Microbiology. 


Plant  and  Animal 
Chemistry. 


Joseph  B.  Lindsey,  Ph.D.,  Chemist. 

Edward  B.  Holland,  Ph.D.,  Associate  Chemist  in  Charge 

(Research  Division). 
Fred  W.  Morse,  M.Sc,  Research  Chemist. 
Henri  D.   Haskins,   B.Sc,   Chemist  in  Charge   {Fertilizer 

Division) . 
Philip  H.  Smith,  M.Sc,  Chemist  in  Charge  {Feed  and  Dairy 

D  ivision) . 
Lewell  S.  Walker,  B.Sc,  Assistayit  Chemist. 
Carleton  p.  Jones,  M.Sc,  Assistant  Chemist. 
Carlos  L.  Beals,  M.Sc,  Assistant  Chemist. 
John  B.  Smith,  '  B.Sc,  Assisia7U  Chemist. 
Robert  S.  Scull,  ^  B.Sc,  Assistant  Chemist. 
Harold  B.  Pierce,  B.Sc,  Assistant  Chemist. 
Miss  Esther  S.  Mixer,  B.A.,  Assista?it  Chemist. 
James  T.  Howard,  Inspector. 
Harry  L.  Allen,  Assistant  in  Laboratory. 
James  R.  Alcock,  Assistant  in  Animal  Nutrition. 
Miss  Alice  M.  Howard,  Clerk. 
Miss  Rebecca  L.  Mellor,  Clerk. 


Poultry  Husbandry.  John  C.  Graham,  B.Sc,  In  Charge  of  Department. 
Hubert  D.  Goodale,  Ph.D.,  Research  Biologist. 
Mrs.  Nettie  A.  Gilmore,  Clerk. 
Miss  Ruby  Sanborn,  Clerk. 


Veterinary  Science.    James  B.  Paige,  B.Sc,  D.V.S.,  Veterinarian. 

G.  Edward  Gage,  *  Ph.D.,  Associate  Professor  of  Animal 

Pathology. 
John  B.  Lentz,  '  V.M.D.,  Assistant. 


'  On  leave  on  account  of  military  service. 


On  leave. 


1919.1  PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  3a 


REPORT   OF   THE   DIRECTOR. 


FRED    W.   MORSE,   ACTING   DIRECTOR. 


The  most  noteworthy  happening  in  the  affairs  of  the  experi- 
ment station  was  the  leave  of  absence  and  subsequent  resigna- 
tion of  its  director,  Dr.  WilHam  P.  Brooks,  who  had  adminis- 
tered its  affairs  since  1906.  On  account  of  ill  health  he  felt 
obliged  to  accept  a  leave  of  absence  March  1,  and  later  re- 
quested to  be  relieved  of  the  director's  responsibilities,  which 
was  done  Oct.  1,  1918.  Dr.  Brooks  has  not  retired  from  the 
service  of  the  experiment  station,  but  as  consulting  agriculturist 
will  continue  to  give  it  the  benefit  of  his  wealth  of  experience 
and  knowledge. 

The  work  of  the  experiment  station  was  noticeably  handi- 
capped during  the  year  by  the  departure,  one  after  another, 
of  members  of  the  staff  for  war  service.  It  was  only  right  that 
those  members  should  be  assured  of  their  positions  upon  the 
completion  of  their  war  service,  but  it  was  found  impracticable 
to  secure  other  workers  to  take  their  places  temporarily,  so  the 
completion  of  some  investigations  was  necessarily  postponed. 
In  one  permanent  and  two  temporary  positions  women  have 
been  employed  in  the  place  of  men,  with  complete  satisfaction; 
but  as  a  rule  college  women  do  not  prefer  scientific  studies,  and 
the  number  of  women  trained  for  our  lines  of  work  is  very 
limited. 

Leaves  of  Absence. 
H.  T.  Fernald,  Ph.D.,  Entomologist,  Dec.  1,  1917,  to  April  30,  1918. 
Wrn.  P.  Brooks,  Ph.D.,  Director,  ill  health,  March  1  to  September  30. 
J.  K.  Shaw,  Ph.D.,  Research  Pomologist,  Sept.  1,  1918,  to  Feb.  28,  1919. 

Leaves  of  Absence  on  Account  of  War  Service. 

John  B.  Lentz,  V.M.D.,  Assistant,  Department  of  Veterinary  Science, 

from  Aug.  31,  1917. 
Robert  S.   Scull,  B.Sc,  Assistant,   Department   of  Plant   and  Animal 

Chemistry,  from  Sept.  11, 1917. 


4a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 

Windom  A.  Allen,  B.Sc,  Assistant,  Department  of  Plant  and  Animal 
Chemistry,  from  Sept.  16,  1917. 

John  B.  Smith,  B.Sc,  Assistant,  Department  of  Plant  and  Animal  Chemis- 
try, from  Oct.  5,  1917. 

G.  Edward  Gage,  Ph.D.,  Associate  Professor  of  Animal  Pathology,  from 
Feb.  1,  1918. 

George  B.  Ray,  B.Sc,  Graduate  Assistant,  Department  of  Microbiology^ 
from  August,  1918. 

Frank  A.  Waugh,  M.Sc,  Horticulturist,  from  Aug.  1,  1918. 

Resignations. 
Miss  Rachael  G.  Leslie,  Clerk,  Department  of  Poultry  Husbandry. 
James  P.  Buckley,  Jr.,  Assistant,   Department  of  Plant  and  Animal 

Chemistry. 
Bernard  L.  Peables,  B.Sc,  Assistant,  Department  of  Plant  and  Animal 

Chemistry. 
Miss  Elizabeth  E.  Mooney,  Clerk,  Department  of  Poultry  Husbandry. 
Samuel  H,   DeVault,    A.M.,    Assistant,    Department    of    Agricultural 

Economics. 
Miss  Grace  MacMullen,  B.A.,  Clerk,  Department  of  Poultry  Husbandry. 
Burton  L.  Gates,  Ph.D.,  Apiarist. 
Wm.  P.  Brooks,  Ph.D.,  Director. 

Appointments. 
Miss  Elizabeth  E.  Mooney,  Clerk,  Department  of  Poultry  Husbandry. 
Harold  B.  Pierce,  B.Sc,  Assistant,  Department  of  Plant  and  Animal 

Chemistry. 
Mrs.  Nettie  A.  Gilmore,  Clerk,  Department  of  Poultry  Husbandry. 
Miss  Esther  S.  Mixer,  B.A.,  Assistant,  Department  of  Plant  and  Animal 

Chemistry. 
Miss  Ruby  Sanborn,  Clerk,  Department  of  Poultry  Husbandry. 

Temporary  Appointments. 

Miss  Mary  Garvey,  Assistant,  Department  of  Plant  and  Animal  Chemis- 
try, May  1  to  July  31. 

Miss  Margaret  Scoville,  Assistant,  Department  of  Microbiology',  July 
1  to  August  31. 

The  work  of  the  experiment  station  is  intended  to  be  the 
pursuit  of  different  lines  of  scientific  investigation  and  what- 
ever inspection  or  control  duties  it  may  have  assigned  to  it 
by  legislative  statutes.  There  are  always  calls  for  advice  and 
information,  however,  which  the  members  of  our  staff  can  give 
and   do  give,   since  it  is  impracticable  to  limit   ourselves   ab- 


1919.]  PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  3L  5a 

solutely  to  the  two  lines  of  work  mentioned,  as  will  be  noted 
in  the  reports  of  the  different  departments.  The  publications 
of  the  experiment  station  are  confined  to  the  primary  lines  of 
work  of  its  staff*,  and  the  list  for  1918  follows: — ■ 

Annual  Report. 
Thirtieth  annual  report :  — 

Part    1.     Report  of  the  Director  and  Other  Officers;  84  pages. 

Part  II.     Detailed  Report  of  the  Experiment  Station,  being  Bulletins 

Nos.  173-181;  348  pages. 
Combined  Contents  and  Index,  Parts  1.  and  II.;  24  pages. 

Bulletins. 

No.  182.     Soy  Beans  as  Human  Food,  by  Arao  Itano;  10  pages. 

No.  183.     Rose  Canker  and  its  Control,  by  P.  J.  Anderson;  36  pages. 

No.  184.  Late  Dormant  verstis  Delayed  Dormant  or  Green  Tip  Treat- 
ment for  the  Control  of  Apple  Aphids,  by  W.  S.  Regan;  12 
pages. 

No.  185.  Inheritance  of  Seed  Coat  Color  in  Garden  Beans,  by  J.  K. 
Shaw  and  J.  B.  Norton;  46  pages. 

No.  186.  I.  The  Composition,  Digestibility  and  Feeding  Value  of 
Alfalfa;  II.  The  Value  of  Corn  Bran  for  Milk  Production, 
by  J.  B.  Lindsey  and  C.  L.  Beals;  50  pages. 

No.  187.  Clarification  of  Milk,  by  C.  E.  Marshall  and  E.  G.  Hood, 
together  with  Lieut.  R.  C.  Avery,  S.  G.  Mutkekar,  Lieut. 
William  L.  Payne,  Mary  L.  Chase,  Harry  L.  Cheplin,  Louise 
Hompe,  John  E.  Martin,  Conrad  H.  Lieber,  James  Neill, 
Louis  P.  Hastings,  John  Yesair  and  Lieut.  E.  L.  Davies; 
88  pages. 

No.  188.     The  Nutrition  of  the  Horse,  by  J.  B.  Lindsey;  22  pages. 

Bulletins,  Control  Series. 
No.      9.     Inspection  of  Commercial  Fertilizers,  by  H.  D.  Haskins,  L.  S. 

Walker  and  H.  B.  Pierce;  76  pages. 
No.    10.     Inspection  of  Commercial  Feedstuffs,  by  P.  H.  Smith;  Grain 

Rations  for  Dairy  Stock,  by  J.  B.  Lindsey;  24  pages. 

Meteorological  Reports. 
Twelve  numbers,  4  pages  each. 

While  most  of  the  farmers  of  the  State  pursue  a  diversified 
agriculture,  there  are  numerous  special  lines  with  problems  that 
are  unrelated  to  other  lines      Therefore  some  of  our  bulletins 


6  a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 

are  mailed  only  to  the  specialists  who  may  be  directly  interested 
in  them.  A  system  of  popular  presentation  of  all  the  work  of 
the  experiment  station  would  be  desirable,  but  it  is  difficult 
to  work  out. 

The  past  year  has  been  the  first  under  the  new  relationship 
between  this  institution  and  the  State,  and  there  have  been 
found  both  advantages  and  disadvantages  under  the  arrange- 
ment. It  may  seem  unreasonable  to  dwell  in  detail  on  the 
disadvantages,  but  it  is  done  to  call  attention  to  certain  regula- 
tions which  may  handicap  the  efficiency  of  the  experiment 
station.  It  is  now  necessary  to  include  in  the  annual  budget 
all  the  requirements  of  the  station  for  men  and  equipment  for 
the  ensuing  fiscal  A'ear,  so  that  it  may  be  approved  b}^  the 
Legislature.  Should  an  important  problem  arise  in  the  course 
of  the  year,  neither  specialist  nor  special  apparatus  could  be 
procured  for  its  solution,  and  the  experiment  station  could  not 
undertake  its  investigation  until  a  new  budget  could  be  ap- 
proved by  the  next  Legislature,  unless  the  problem  came  within 
the  scope  of  its  present  staff  and  equipment. 

The  cranberry  substation  had  an  exceptionally  prosperous 
year.  The  crop  was  one  of  the  largest  exer  secured  from  the 
bog,  and  the  prices  were  very  high.  The  receipts  under  the 
new  conditions  must  be  remitted  to  the  State  Treasurer.  The 
financial  statement  for  the  year  follows :  — 

Cranberry  Substation,  Dec.  1,  1917,  to  Nov.  30,  1918. 
Receipts. 
Cranberries,  crop  of  1917,    .  ... 

Cranberries,  crop  of  1918,    .... 
United  States  Weather  Bureau,    . 
Miscellaneous  receipts,         .... 

Bills  receivable  on  Dec.  1,  1918  (estimated), 
Cranberries  on  hand  Dec.  1,  1918  (estimated). 

Total  received  and  receivable, $9,720  20 

Expenditures  —  Bog  Account. 

Maintenance, $839  03 

Harvesting, 2,924  32 

$3,763  35 


$1,158  52 

4,919  36 

136  67 

5  65 

$6,220  20 

1,800  00 

1,700  00 

1919.1 


PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  3L 


7a 


Expenditures  — 

Experimental  Account. 

Blueberry  plantation, 

S90  92 

Labor,       .... 

817  07 

Maintenance,     . 

499  86 

Office  maintenance,     . 

310  94 

Travel,      .... 

223  23 

L,942  02 


Total  exi^enditures. 


55,705  37 


The  inspection  of  fertilizers  and  of  feeding  stuffs  has  been 
reported  in  detail  in  Control  Bulletins  Nos.  9  and  ]0.  The 
financial  statements  for  the  two  inspections  are  given  here. 
It  will  be  noted  that  the  fertilizer  inspection  cost  nearly  $2,000 
more  than  was  received  for  registration  fees  from  the  manu- 
facturers. To  remedy  this  situation  the  fertilizer  law  was 
amended  by  the  Legislature  of  1918  by  imposing  a  supplemen- 
tary fee  of  6  cents  per  ton  on  the  amount  of  fertilizer  sold 
during  the  year,  which  is  expected  to  raise  sufficient  additional 
revenue  to  insure  an  adequate  inspection.  The  text  of  the 
amendment  is  given  in  Control  Bulletin  No.  9. 


Fertilizer  Law  Account,  Dec.  1,  1917,  to  Nov.  30,  1918. 


Balance  Dec.  1,  1917, 

1559  41 

Total  fees. 

Expenditures. 

7,007  50 

Apparatus, 

$331  11 

Chemicals, 

291  73 

Collection  expenses:  — 

Inspector's  salary,  . 

$854  33 

Travel,  .         .         .         . 

652  52 

Freight  and  express. 

26  57 

1,533  42 
110  06 

Gas, 

Labor, 

60  24 

Laundry,  . 

5  29 

Miscellaneous  supplies. 

34  01 

Office  supplies,  . 

38  32 

Publication:  — 

Bulletin  No.  8, 

$670  80 

Circular, 

15  60 

Mailing, 

.4  40 

Aon  en 

$7,566  91 


8a 


EXPERIMENT  STATION. 


[Jan. 


Repairs,    .... 
Salaries :  — 

Chemical, 

Clerical, 

Telephone, 

Travel,  miscellaneous, 

Total, 

Overdraft  Dec.  1,  1918, 


$5  63 


$5,521  99 
660  50 

6,182  49 

16  67 

182  40 

.  $9,482  17 

.  $1,915  26 

Feed  Law  Account,  Dec.  1,  1917,  to  Nov.  30,  1918. 
Balance  on  hand,  Dec.  1,  1917,    .  .  .  $1,328  50 

State  appropriation,    .  .  .  .  .  6,000  00 


^328  50 


Apparatus, 
Chemicals, 
Collection  expenses :  — 

Inspector's  salary,  . 

Travel,  . 

Express, 

Furniture  and  fixtures. 
Gas, 
Labor, 
Laundry,  . 
Legal  advice, 
Travel,  . 


Miscellaneous  supplies, 
Office  supplies,  . 
Publication :  — ■ 

Bulletin  No.  9, 

Mailing, 

Repairs,    . 

Salaries :  — 
Chemical, 
Clerical, 

Travel,  miscellaneous, 


Expenditures. 


$511  66 

796  47 

20  36 


$25  00 
18  09 


$330  10 
7  00 


5,044  15 
557  50 


$75  14 
384  27 


1,328  49 

52  75 

61  31 

75  39 

10  99 

43  09 

75  68 

54  03 

337  10 
5  35 


3,601  65 
53  08 


1919. 


PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31. 


9a 


Feeding  experiments:  — 

Apparatus, 

$195  59 

Feedstuffs, 

54  40 

Livestock, 

25  00 

Remodeling  barns,  . 

405  14 

Salaries, 

88  33 

Total, 

Balance  Dec.  1,  1918, 

$768  46 


),926  78 


$401  72 


The  financial  report  of  the  treasurer  and  the  reports  of  the 
heads  of  departments  are  appended. 


FRED   W.   MORSE, 

Acting  Director. 


10  a 


EXPERIMENT  STATION. 


[Jan. 


REPORT   OF  THE  TREASURER. 


ANNUAL  REPORT 

Of  Fred  C.  Kenney,  Treasurer  of  the  JVIassachusetts  Agricul- 
tural Experiment  Station  of  the  Massachusetts  Agricultural 
College,  for  the  Year  ending  June  30,  1918. 

United  States  A])2)ropriaiions,  1917-18. 


Hatch  Fund. 


Adams  Fund. 


Dr. 

To  receipts  from  the  Treasurer  of  the  United 
States,  as  per  appropriations  for  fiscal  year 
ended  June  30,  1918,  under  acts  of  Congress 
approved  March  2,  1SS7,  and  March  16,  1906, 

Cr. 

By  salaries, $14,913  95 

Chemicals  and  laboratory  sup- 
plies,     42  05 

Seeds,  plants  and   sundry  sup- 
plies,     34  00 

Labor, 10  00 


By  salaries, S14,529  96 

Fertilizer,       .               .        /      .  78  29 
Seeds,  plants   and   sundry  sup- 
plies,  . 33  23 

Labor, 358  52 


$15,000  00 


$15,000  00 


$15,000  00 


$15,000  00 


1919.1 


PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31. 


11a 


State  Appropriation,  1917-18. 
Cash  balance  brought  forward  from  last  fiscal  year, 
Cash  received  from  State  Treasurer,   . 

fees,    . 

sales,  . 

miscellaneous, 


$15,901  00 

46,000  00 

10,638  10 

9,448  87 

3,651  37 


.$85,639  34 

Cash  paid  for  salaries,        ...... 

$21,349  02 

labor,           ...... 

24,558  56 

publications,         .          .          .         .      "  . 

505  88 

postage  and  stationery. 

1,266  08 

freight  and  express,     .  . 

330  09 

heat,  light,  water  and  power. 

433  07 

chemicals  and  laboratory  supplies. 

1,383  72 

seeds,  plants  and  sundry  supplies,  . 

2,493  67 

fertilizer,      ...... 

1,442  22 

feeding  stuffs,       ..... 

1,760  54 

library,         ...... 

413  94 

tools,  machinery  and  appliances,     . 

355  04 

furniture  and  fixtures,  .... 

472  38 

scientific  apparatus  and  specimens, 

289  42 

live  stock,    ...... 

191  72 

traveling  expenses,         .... 

3,797  22 

contingent  expenses,      .... 

25  00 

buildings  and  land,        .... 

1,636  85 

balance,       ...... 

22,934  92 

Total, 


55,639  34 


12  a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 


DEPARTMENT   OF  AGRICULTURAL 
ECONOMICS. 


LORIAN    P.    JEFFERSON. 


The  work  of  the  department  of  agricultural  economics  has 
been  along  two  lines.  During  the  early  part  of  the  year  Mr. 
S.  H.  DeVault,  research  assistant  in  the  department,  continued 
his  study  of  the  supply  and  distribution  of  cigar-leaf  tobacco 
in  the  Connecticut  valley.  The  preparation  of  his  monograph 
on  the  subject  was  nearing  completion  when  he  resigned,  June 
1,  1918,  and  went  into  the  army.  The  monograph  is  being 
completed  by  other  members  of  the  department,  and  it  is 
expected  that  it  will  soon  be  ready  for  publication. 

A  study  of  food  distribution  in  the  city  of  Holyoke  is  now 
under  way,  the  field  work  being  done  by  Mr.  D.  W.  Sawtelle, 
instructor  in  agricultural  economics,  and  Mr.  A.  S.  Thurston, 
who  has  been  temporarily  secured  as  assistant  in  the  depart- 
ment. The  study  has  included  such  questions  as  the  area 
which  receives  the  bulk  of  its  supplies  through  Holyoke;  the 
methods  and  facilities  of  transportation  of  foods  into  the  city 
and  reshipments  to  other  markets;  the  sources  of  supply  of 
foods  consumed  in  the  city;  the  community  market  as  a 
method  of  distribution;  the  place  of  hucksters  in  local  market- 
ing of  foods;  and,  specifically,  the  milk  supply  of  the  city, 
the  feed  business  and  local  slaughtering  of  live  stock.  Some 
interesting  charts  are  being  prepared  for  use  in  the  monograph 
which  is  to  embody  the  findings  of  this  study. 


1919.1  PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  13a 


DEPARTMENT   OF  AGRICULTURE. 


E.    F.    GASKILL. 


The  experimental  work  of  this  department  has  been  con- 
tinued along  the  same  general  lines  as  previously  reported. 
The  study  of  different  phases  of  the  question  of  soil  fertility 
has  required  about  the  same  number  of  field  plots. 

The  crop  on  Field  A  (the  nitrogen  experiment)  was  corn, 
and  the  results  are  in  close  agreement  with  those  obtained 
in  previous  years. 

On  the  potash  field  (Field  G)  the  crop  was  soy  beans,  and  as 
in  previous  years  the  crop  did  not  show  any  striking  response 
to  potash. 

Potatoes  were  grown  on  the  phosphate  field,  and  while  the 
yield  was  only  fair  on  most  of  the  plots,  yet,  as  has  usually 
been  the  case  with  this  crop,  the  better  yields  were  obtained 
on  the  plots  receiving  the  quickly  available  phosphates. 

The  north  corn  acre  gave  on  the  average  about  23^  tons  of 
hay  per  acre  but,  owing  to  the  drought,  no  rowen  crop. 

On  Field  B,  where  muriate  and  sulfate  of  potash  are  com- 
pared, the  various  crops  this  year  gave  results  in  close  agree- 
ment with  those  of  previous  years. 

The  orchard  work  has  been  continued  as  in  previous  years, 
with  the  exception  of  that  at  the  Graves'  Orchard,  which  was 
discontinued  because  of  the  expiration  of  the  lease  of  the 
orchard . 

As  a  result  of  our  work  in  testing  different  varieties  of  soy 
beans,  we  have  three  varieties  of  yellow  beans,  which  have 
not  yet  been  named,  which  give  promise  of  being  very  useful 
in  this  State.  None  of  these  varieties,  however,  yields  as  well 
as  our  Medium  Green  variety.  It  is  believed  these  yellow 
varieties  will  be  found  the  better  varieties  for  some  of  the  more 
elevated  areas  where  the  growing  season  is  not  as  long  as  it 
is  here  in  Amherst. 


14  a 


EXPERIMENT  STATION. 


[Jan. 


An  attempt  was  made  to  learn  something  about  the  varieties 
of  winter  wheat  best  adapted  to  this  section.  Nine  different 
varieties  were  sown  the  previous  fall  and  came  through  the 
winter  in  splendid  shape.  The  varieties  and  their  yields  are 
shown  in  the  following  table:  — 


Source. 

YiELD.s  PER  Acre. 

Variety. 

Grain 
(Bushels). 

Straw 
(Pounds). 

Red  Rock, 
Poole, 
Red  Cross, 
Minnesota  Reliable, 
Turkey  Red,      . 
Ohio  8106,  . 
Gladden,    .        .    , 
Trumbull, 
Portage, 

Michigan,  Agricultural  College,  East  Lansing,  . 
Indiana,  Edgar  Logan,  Goshen, 
Indiana,  Harry  Greene,  Goshen, 

Illinois,  Agricultural  Experiment  Station,   Ur- 

bana. 
Illinois,  Agricultural  Experiment  Station,  Ur- 

bana. 
Ohio,  A.  S.  Booco,  Jeffersonville, 

Ohio,  Agricultural  Experiment  Station,  Wooster, 

Ohio,  Agricultural  Experiment  Station,  Wooster, 

Ohio,  Agricultural  Experiment  Station,  Wooster, 

35.8 
34.5 
34.1 
35.1 
37.6 
30.0 
31.5 
41.9 
40.4 

2,975 
2,625 
2,450 
3,500 
3,500 
2,800 
4,200 
3,500 
2,800 

Three   varieties   of   spring   wheat   were   also   sown,    but   the 
yields  were  very  unsatisfactory.  , 


Top-dressing  Permanent  Mowings. 

An  experiment  to  determine  the  effect  of  applying  annually 
different  manures  on  grassland  was  begun  in  1886  by  the  late 
Dr.  Goessmann,  and,  with  certain  changes  in  the  arrangement 
of  plots  and  modifications  of  the  fertilizer  schedule,  has  been 
continued  under  the  direction  of  Dr.  Brooks  until  the  present 
time.  Results  from  year  to  year  have  been  published  by  Dr. 
Goessmann  and  later  by  Dr.  Brooks  in  the  annual  reports  of 
the  experiment  station,  but  no  attempt  has  been  made  to  bring 
all  the  data  together  in  one  article.  Believing  that  the  experi- 
ment has  continued  long  enough  to  show  the  value  of  such  a 
system  of  top-dressing  permanent  mowings,  and  wishing  to 
make  certain  changes  in  the  fertilizer  schedule,  it  is  thought 
an  opportune  time  to  review  the  whole  experiment  and  bring 
the  data  together. 

The  experiment  consisted  of  two  periods,  the  first  beginning 


1919.]  PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  15  a 

in  1886  and  continuing  through  1892:  the  second  beginning 
in  1892  and  continuing  through  1918.  The  field  used  in  both 
periods  consists  of  9.6  acres,  and  Hes  on  the  east  side  of  the 
pubUc  highway.  It  is  divided  into  a  north  and  a  south  field 
by  a  road  leading  from  the  highway  to  other  fields  beyond  the 
mowing,  while  an  open  ditch  at  right  angles  to  the  road  divides 
it  into  east  and  west  sections.  Previous  to  1886  this  area  was 
an  old  worn-out  mowing  covered  with  a  w^orthless  growth  on 
the  more  elevated  portions  and  a  growth  of  sedges  on  the 
lower  portions.  The  work  of  tile  draining  the  area  and  pre- 
paring the  seed  bed  is  described  in  detail  by  Dr.  Goessmann 
in  the  eighth  and  ninth  annual  reports  of  the  Massachusetts 
State  Experiment  Station. 

During  the  first  part  of  the  experiment  a  study  was  made  of 
the  effect  of  top-dressing  permanent  mowings  with  manure, 
bone  and  potash  and  ashes  where  each  material  was  used  on 
the  same  plot  year  after  year.  The  yields  on  the  different  plots 
for  the  years  1889  through  1892  are  given  in  the  eighth,  ninth 
and  tenth  reports  of  the  Massachusetts  State  Experiment 
Station.  The  average  yield  of  hay  and  rowen  on  the  entire 
area  for  the  year  1889  was  3.67  tons  per  acre;  for  the  year 
1892,  3.39  tons  per  acre. 

In  1893  the  plots  were  rearranged  and  the  following  fertilizer 
schedule  adopted :  — 


Plot. 

Fertilizer. 

Per  Acre. 

1 

2 

3 

Wood  ashes  (ton), 

Manure  (tons), 

Fine-ground  steamed  bone  (pounds),  . 

Muriate  of  potash  (pounds),          .... 

1 

8 

600 

200 

The  fertilizers  were  used  in  rotation  as  a  top-dressing;  that 
is,  the  plot  that  this  year  received  manure  will  next  year  receive 
wood  ashes,  and  the  plot  receiving  the  bone  meal  and  potash 
mixture  will  next  year  receive  manure,  etc.  Under  this  system 
there  is  one  plot  each  year  top-dressed  with  manure,  one  top- 
dressed  with  bone  meal  and  potash,  and  one  top-dressed  with 
ashes. 


16  a 


EXPERIMENT  STATION. 


[Jan. 


In  addition  to  the  regular  application  of  fertilizers,  nitrate 
of  soda  at  the  rate  of  150  pounds  per  acre  was  added  two 
different  years  to  note  its  effect  on  both  the  hay  and  rowen 
crops.  The  increase  in  the  rowen  crop  due  to  this  treatment 
was  approximately  600  pounds  per  acre. 

That  part  of  plot  3  lying  east  of  the  ditch  was  plowed  in 
1900,  and  in  1901  and  1902  it  was  planted  with  a  cultivated 
crop.  After  the  removal  of  the  hay  crop  in  1902,  that  portion 
of  plot  3  west  of  the  ditch  and  that  portion  of  plots  1  and  2 
east  of  the  ditch  were  plowed.  After  harrowing  several  times, 
all  plowed  portions  were  reseeded.  At  this  time  plots  1  and  2 
east  of  the  ditch  were  subdivided  into  a  north  and  a  south 
half,  and  two  different  mixtures  of  grass  seed  sown.  On  the 
north  half  of  each  plot  was  sown  a  mixture  known  as  the  fescue 
mixture,  and  made  up  as  follows:  — 


Timothy,    . 
Red  top. 
Red  clover, 
Alsike  clover, 
Kentucky  blue  grass, 
Meadow  fescue,  . 
Tall  fescue. 


Pounds 
per  Acre. 

6 


On  the  south  half  of  each  was  sown  the  timothy  mixture, 
made  up  as  follows:  — 

Pounds 
per  Acre. 

Timothy,     ...........  18 

Red  top,     ...........  8 

Red  clover,           ..........  5 

Alsike  clover,       ..........  4 


These  two  mixtures  are  compared  in  Table  V. 

Plot  3  was  reseeded  with  the  timothy  mixture. 

A  few  variations  in  the  fertilizer  schedule  are  noted.  In 
1912  the  application  of  ashes  was  discontinued,  and  a  mixture 
of  basic  slag  and  muriate  of  potash  substituted.  In  1916,  1917 
and  1918  no  potash  was  applied,  and  in  1918  the  slag  was 
omitted. 

The  present  system  of  applying  fertilizers  in  rotation  has 
been  in  practice  twenty-six  years.     Some  portion  of  each  plot 


1919.1 


PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31. 


17a 


has  been  in  grass  each  year.  All  plots,  with  the  exception  of 
that  portion  of  plots  1  and  2  west  of  the  ditch,  have  been 
reseeded  once. 

The  results  for  this  year  (1918)  represent  the  yields  on  plots 
a  portion  of  which  have  been  continuously  in  grass  for  thirty 
years,  and  a  portion  of  which  have  been  continuously  in  grass 
for  sixteen  years. 

Table  I.  —  Yields  per  Acre  under  the  Three  Systems  of  Top-dressing, 

1918  (Pounds). 


Fertilizers. 

Hay. 

Rowen. 

Total. 

Barnyard  manure, 

Bone  and  potash,  1 

Slag  and  potash,! 

2,193 
3,157 
3,444 

1,203 

323 

1,285 

3,396 
3,480 
4,728 

! 

1  No  potash  was  applied  in  1916,  1917  and  1918,  and  no  slag  in  1918. 

The  average  yield  for  the  entire  area  this  year  was  3,976 
pounds. 

Since  1915  it  has  been  necessary  to  omit  the  potash  three 
years  and  the  slag  one  year;  therefore  a  better  idea  of  the 
merits  of  the  system  may  be  obtained  by  considering  the 
yields  up  to  that  time. 

Table  II.  —  Yields  j^er  Acre  under  the  Three  Systems  of  Top-dressing 

(Pounds). 


Fertilizers. 

1915. 

Average, 

Hay. 

Rowen. 

TotaL 

1893-1915. 

Barnyard  manure,      .... 

Bone  and  potash 

Wood  ashes,! 

3,519 
3,231 
4,399 

2,172 
2,320 
2,704 

5,691 
5,551 
7.103 

6,007 
5,898 
5,610 

!  Beginning  in  1912  a  mixture  of  slag  and  potash  has  been  substituted  for  the  wood  ashes. 


The  different  items  entering  into  the  cost  of  the  production 
of  hay  vary  greatly  on  different  farms.  The  figures  given  in 
Table  III.  represent  the  average  prices  of  fertilizer  on  the 
farm  and  of  hay  in  the  barn  in  Amherst.     The  figures  in  the 


18  a 


EXPERIMENT  STATION, 


[Jan. 


column  "Increase  due  to  the  use  of  fertilizers"  are  obtained 
by  subtracting  2,000  pounds  from  the  preceding  column, 
"Yield  per  acre  of  hay  and  rowen."  It  is  generally  considered 
by  all  who  are  familiar  with  this  field  that  it  would  produce 
better  than  one  ton  per  acre  of  hay  and  rowen  without  any 
fertilizer.  Wishing  to  be  on  the  conservative  side,  it  was 
assumed  that  this  area  w^ould  produce  one  ton  per  acre  without 
any  fertilizer;  and  therefore  the  figures  in  this  column,  2,000 
pounds  less  than  the  total  product  of  hay  and  rowen,  are 
assumed  to  represent  the  increase  due  to  the  use  of  fertilizer. 
The  labor  of  harvesting  the  crop  has  not  been  considered  in 
the  following  table.  This  item  will  vary  greatly  on  different 
farms,  but  must  be  considered  in  judging  the  real  economy 
of  any  scheme  of  fertilization. 

Table  III.  —  Increase  in  Yield  due  to  the  Use  of  Fertilizer.  —  Its  Value 

arid  Cost. 


Year. 


Fertilizers. 


Hay  and 

Rowen 

(Average 

Yields  per 

Acre). 


Increase 
due  to  Use 

of 
Fertilizers. 

Value  of 
Increase. 

1,933 

$17  40 

2,846 

25  61 

2,610 

23  49 

3,079 

27  71 

4,234 

38  11 

Cost  of 
Fertilizers 

and 
Applica- 
tion. 


1911 


1912 


1913 


1915 


Manure, 

Bone  and  potash 

Ashes, 

Manure, 

Bone  and  potash 

Slag  and  potash 

Manure, 

Bone  and  potash 

Slag  and  potash 

Manure, 

Bone  and  potash 

Slag  and  potash 

Maniire, 

Bone  and  potash 

Slag  and  potash 


3,933 


4,846 


4,610 


6,079 


$15  67 


15  20 


15  20 


15  20 


15  20 


The  area  of  plot  1  is  3.97  acres;  of  plot  2,  2.59  acres;  and 
of  plot  3,  3  acres;  and  it  undoubtedly  will  be  asked  whether 
the  soil  is  of  uniform  character,  and  whether  all  three  plots 
are  equally  well  suited  for  the  production  of  hay.  In  Table  IV. 
are  presented  data  for  a  period  of  twenty-three  years  (1896- 
1918)  in  answer  to  this  question. 


1919. 


PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31. 


19  a 


Table  IV.  — Fertilizers  Used  and  Average  Yields  -per  Acre  on  Each  Plot 
for  Twenty-three  Years. 


Number  of  Years  fertilized  with  — 

Hay  and 
Rowen 

(Average 
Yields 

per  Acre). 

Plot. 

Manure. 

Bone 
and  Pot- 
ash. 

Ashes. 

Slag 
and  Pot- 
ash. 

Bone. 

Slag. 

Noth- 
ing. 

1,  .        .        . 

2,  .        .        . 

3,  .        .        . 

8 
8 

7 

6 

7 

7 

5 
5 
6 

2 
1 
1 

1 
1 
1 

1 
1 

1 

5,872.5 
5,435.0 
5,487.5 

Considering  the  average  yields  per  acre  on  the  different  plots, 
there  does  not  appear  to  be  any  difference  that  could  be  said 
to  be  due  to  unequal  soil  or  moisture  conditions. 


Table  V.  —  Comparison  of  Yields  of  Timothy  and  Fescue  Mixtures. 


Year. 


Hat  and  Rov/en  (Yields 
PER  Acre,  Pounds). 


1903,  . 

1904,  . 

1905,  . 

1906,  . 

1907,  . 

1908,  . 

1909,  . 

1910,  . 

1911,  . 

1912,  . 

1913,  . 

1914,  . 

1915,  . 
Average, 

I       ■  Z=. 


The  timothy  mixture  gave  the  better  yield  the  first  year  after 
seeding;  since  then  the  fescue  mixture  has  given  the  larger 
crop.  At  the  present  time  there  is  very  little  timothy  on  either 
plot,  it  having  been  replaced  very  largely  by  blue  grass.  The 
fescue  mixture  would  seem  to  be  the  better  of  the  two  for  use 
on  fields  of  this  character,  which  are  to  be  kept  in  grass  a 
number  of  years. 


20  a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 


DEPARTMENT   OF  BOTANY. 


A.   VINCENT   OSMUN. 


The  work  of  the  department  during  the  last  year  has  followed 
along  lines  indicated  in  previous  reports.  Satisfactory  progress 
has  been  made  on  old  and  new  projects,  although  war  con- 
ditions and  the  unusual  weather  of  the  last  growing  season, 
which  brought  many  calls  into  the  field,  interrupted  and  often 
seriously  interfered  with  orderly  and  consistent  attention  to 
regular,  projected  research.  War  emergency  projects  of  various 
organizations  and  agencies  received  attention  from  members 
of  the  staff.  In  general,  the  benefits  from  work  of  this  sort 
have  not  appeared  proportionate  to  the  time  and  expense 
involved.  A  large  part  of  such  activities  are  properly  ex- 
tension work,  and  should  not  be  confused,  as  was  often  the 
case,  with  the  research  functions  of  the  experiment  station. 
Much  of  the  so-called  co-operative  war  emergency  work  be- 
tween outside  agencies  and  State  men  was  too  hurriedly  and 
loosely  organized  to  be  effective,  and  often  it  seemed  ill-advised 
from  the  start.  In  perspective  it  appears  that  proper  use  of 
State  forces  would  have  been  more  effective  and  efficient  in 
accomplishing  certain  ends.  However,  the  important  work  of 
the  department  was  kept  to  the  fore,  and  the  interference  of 
transient  outside  activities  with  regular  projects  was  minimized 
as  much  as  possible. 

Investigations  having  as  their  object  the  control  of  lettuce 
drop,  a  disease  caused  by  Sclerotinia  lihertiana,  have  been  under 
way  for  several  years.  Control  measures  have  been  tried  out 
in  the  department  greenhouse  and  on  a  commercial  scale  in  large 
lettuce  houses  in  Arlington.  Eminently  satisfactory  results 
have  been  obtained  from  repeated  trials.  In  addition  to  green- 
house work  on  this  disease  fundamental  study  of  the  causal 
fungus  has  been  conducted  in  the  laboratory.     A  bulletin  em- 


1919.]  PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  21a 

bodying  the  results  of  this  work  should  be  ready  for  early 
publication. 

Mr.  Clark's  study  of  light  in  relation  to  plant  growth  was 
again  carried  to  the  field  last  summer,  with  striking  results. 
The  unique  tents  which  provide  varying  light  intensities  for 
the  growing  crops  which  they  screen  have  proven  very  satis- 
factory for  this  work.  Laboratory  studies  in  connection  with 
this  project  have  continued. 

At  the  suggestion  of  Dr.  Neil  E.  Stevens  of  the  Bureau  of 
Plant  Industry,  United  States  Department  of  Agriculture, 
certain  physiological  studies  in  connection  with  the  problem  of 
controlling  decay  of  ripe  strawberries  were  undertaken  last 
summer.  A  large  amount  of  laboratory  work  has  been  done  by 
Mr.  Clark,  and  this  will  be  continued  next  season. 

The  work  under  the  general  project  for  investigation  of  so- 
called  tobacco  sick  soils,  in  charge  of  Dr.  Chapman,  has  pro- 
ceeded in  accordance  with  plans  previously  outlined.  Impor- 
tant results  have  been  obtained  both  in  the  laboratory  and  in 
the  field.  This  work  is  becoming  increasingly  valuable  to  the 
tobacco  growers,  and  they,  in  turn,  have  shown  their  apprecia- 
tion of  it.  In  connection  with  this  project  a  study  of  meteoro- 
logical factors  in  relation  to  the  tobacco  crop  has  been  made, 
and  the  data  gathered  are  practically  ready  for  publication. 

Experimental  spraying  of  celery  for  the  control  of  early  and 
late  blights,  conducted  by  Mr.  Krout,  has  continued  through 
two  seasons.  This  work  has  been  done  on  plots  laid  out  as 
parts  of  commercial  fields  in  the  eastern  part  of  the  State  and 
at  the  market-garden  field  station.  Data  already  obtained 
indicate  that  an  efficient  method  of  control  is  at  hand.  Another 
season's  work  on  this  project  should  provide  sufficient  results  on 
which  to  base  definite  conclusions  and  recommendations  which 
can  be  adopted  by  growers. 

The  project  for  investigation  of  onion  diseases  is  referred  to 
elsewhere  in  this  report. 

The  growing  season  of  1918  was  preceded  by  a  winter  notable 
for  its  severity.  Periods  of  extreme  cold  caused  unprecedented 
winter  injury  and  killing  of  trees  and  shrubs.  Scarcely  any 
species  escaped  entirely,  and  some  native  species  of  trees  which 
have   remained    hardy   through   previous   winters   were    killed 


22  a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 

outright.  The  peach  crop  was  almost  a  total  failure  on  account 
of  fruit  buds  being  killed,  and  many  peach  orchards  suffered 
heavily  from  killing  back  of  wood  and  death  of  trees.  Many 
trees  and  shrubs  which  were  only  partially  killed  or  injured 
by  the  winter  conditions  failed  to  recuperate  on  account  of  the 
unfavorable  growing  conditions  which  prevailed  throughout 
the  following  summer.  The  month  of  June  was  abnormally 
cold,  and  vegetation  was  checked  to  a  considerable  degree. 
Late  in  the  month  killing  frosts  occurred  on  two  days,  causing 
a  large  amount  of  damage  to  garden  and  truck  crops,  especially 
in  the  eastern  part  of  the  State.  A  long  period  of  drought, 
extending  through  June,  July  and  August,  occasionally  broken 
by  rainfall  insufficient  to  compensate  for  the  extreme  dryness, 
caused  vegetation  to  suffer  severely.  To  the  weather  conditions 
may  be  attributed  much  of  the  trouble  which  interfered  with 
crop  development.  Potatoes  especially  were  seriously  affected. 
So  unusual  and  general  was  the  injury  to  potatoes  that  the 
time  of  the  pathologists  was  severely  taxed  by  calls  to  the  field. 
After  a  State-wide  investigation  it  became  evident  that  potatoes 
were  suffering  from  a  combination  of  conditions  which  were 
often  so  complicated  as  to  make  diagnosis  most  difficult  and 
frequently  uncertain.  In  general,  however,  two  distinct  types 
of  injury  usually  resulting  in  early  death  of  the  vines  were 
apparent.  Careful  study  in  field  and  laboratory  convinced  the 
writer  that  these  were  due  directly  or  indirectly  to  drought  and 
to  a  fungus  of  the  genus  Phoma.  The  potato  is  very  susceptible 
to  lack  of  moisture,  and  where  planted  on  light  soil  or  on  hill- 
sides the  crop  suffered,  as  a  rule,  in  proportion  to  the  drying 
out  of  the  soil.  Premature  yellowing,  wilting  and  dying  of  the 
vines  were  the  marked  characteristics  of  this  trouble.  It  seems 
doubtful  if  it  was  in  any  way  associated  with  the  type  of 
fertilizer  used,  although  it  was  perhaps  less  severe  in  a  few 
cases  where  stable  manure  was  employed.  This,  however,  is 
attributable  to  the  better  water-holding  capacity  of  soil  con- 
taining abundant  organic  matter.  Absence  of  potash  in  com- 
mercial fertilizers  has  been  advanced  by  some  investigators 
as  one  factor  responsible  for  this  condition.  In  the  course  of 
our  field  investigations  we  found  a  number  of  plots  where 
potash  in  the  usual  amounts  had  been  applied,  but  with  no 


1919.]  PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  23  a 

apparent  diminution  of  the  trouble  as  a  result.  Irish  Cobblers 
and  Green  Mountains  were  about  equally  affected  by  this 
trouble,  but  the  former,  an  earlier  variety,  usually  succumbed 
first.  Dibble's  Russet  was  noted  as  especially  resistant  to 
drought  conditions. 

The  presence  of  the  fungus  Phoma  in  a  large  number  of  fields 
throughout  the  State,  the  typical  stem  lesions  caused  by  the 
fungus,  and  the  uniformity  with  which  these  appeared  under 
certain  conditions,  furnish  strong  evidence  that  this  so-called 
disease  was  responsible  for  a  considerable  amount  of  damage  to 
the  potato  crop  last  season.  Laboratory  tests,  not  yet  com- 
pleted, indicate  that  the  fungus  is  at  least  mildly  parasitic 
under  conditions  of  moisture.  After  examination  of  a  few 
fields  in  which  Phoma  was  in  evidence,  it  became  apparent 
that  the  injury  from  the  fungus  was  practically  limited  to  low- 
lying  areas,  usually  of  rather  heavy  moisture-holding  soil. 
Where  a  field  consisted  of  both  high  and  low  land  there  was 
a  gradual  diminution  of  the  trouble  along  the  upward  slope, 
and  often  a  merging  into  the  trouble  previously  attributed  to 
drought.  At  a  distance  Phoma  infected  plants  are  yellow  and 
stunted  in  appearance.  This  condition  is  followed  by  wilting 
and  dying  of  the  tops.  Such  plants  invariably  show  conspicuous 
brown  lesions  on  the  stem,  and  these  often  in  combination  form 
a  complete  girdle.  Typical  Phoma  pycnidia  appear  on  the  older 
lesions.  Pure  cultures  of  the  fungus  were  obtained  from  which 
inoculation  experiments  are  in  progress.  The  present  incom- 
plete knowledge  of  this  fungus  makes  impossible  any  definite 
conclusions  as  to  whether  Phoma  may  be  considered  a  serious 
destructive  parasite  of  the  potato.  However,  preliminary 
studies  in  the  field  and  laboratory  and  careful  observations 
incline  us  strongly  to  the  opinion  that  the  Phoma  disease  of 
potato  will  not,  under  normal  seasonal  conditions,  prove  of  any 
consequence.  We  believe  the  weather  to  be  a  prime  contribut- 
ing factor  in  the  parasitism  of  the  fungus,  and  that  the  disease 
need  not  be  considered  in  the  general  schedule  of  treatment 
for  diseases  of  this  crop. 

Mosaic  disease  and  leaf  roll  of  potato  were  unusually  preva- 
lent and  severe.  Few  fields  of  the  Green  Mountain  type  were 
free  from  mosaic,  and  a  rather  careful  survey  indicates  that 


24  a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 

the  average  for  the  State  was  above  20  per  cent  of  diseased 
plants.  As  high  as  80  per  cent  was  noted.  The  estimated 
reduction  of  yield  due  to  mosaic  is  from  10  to  80  per  cent. 
Leaf  roll  was  more  frequently  observed  on  Irish  Cobblers. 
These  and  certain  other  so-called  degeneration  diseases  are 
communicable  through  the  tubers.  They  are,  as  a  rule,  more 
abundant  where  home-grown  ''seed,"  or  "seed"  from  one  to 
several -generations  from  the  north,  are  used.  While  northern- 
grown  potatoes  are  by  no  means  free  from  these  diseases,  it  is 
apparent  that  climatic  conditions  in  Massachusetts  tend  to 
increase  them.  Except  in  the  higher  regions  of  the  State, 
progressive  increase  of  these  diseases  and  consequent  degenera- 
tion invariably  attend  attempts  to  grow  potatoes  from  the 
same  stock  year  after  year.  As  the  production  of  suitable 
seed  potatoes  in  our  higher  altitudes  is  inadequate  to  the 
demands  of  the  entire  State,  it  is  evident  that  if  the  potato 
yield  of  the  State  is  to  be  increased  or  even  maintained  growers 
must  depend  largely  on  northern-grown  ''seed."  Only  properly 
inspected  and  certified  "seed"  should  be  accepted,  because 
many  northern  fields  are  badly  infected  with  tuber-communi- 
cated diseases.  A  movement  has  been  initiated  through  the 
extension  service,  to  promote  and  encourage  the  practice  of 
planting  only  good  "seed"  potatoes.  General  adoption  of  this 
practice  would  result  in  much  benefit  to-  the  potato  growers, 
and  would  increase  the  State's  total  production  without  in- 
creasing the  area  devoted  to  the  crop.  An  effort  also  will  be 
made  to  have  non-susceptible  varieties  substituted  for  the 
Green  Mountain  type. 

The  more  common  potato  diseases  were  by  no  means  entirely 
absent  last  season,  although  the  troubles  above  discussed  were 
responsible  for  a  large  part  of  the  losses  previous  to  harvesting 
the  crop.  In  July  early  blight  was  rather  severe  in  some  fields, 
but  the  ravages  of  this  disease  were  checked  by  the  drought. 
Late  blight  was  present  in  many  fields,  but  the  outbreak  was 
light  and  little  damage  in  the  field  resulted.  However,  heavy 
rainfall  in  September,  before  the  bulk  of  the  crop  was  harvested 
and  stored,  gave  the  fungus  of  this  disease  a  start  in  the  tubers, 
and  the  result  has  been  heavy  losses  in  storage. 

The  wet  weather  of  September   also  proved  detrimental  to 


1919.]  PUBLIC   DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  25  a 

the  onion  crop.  Those  onions  which  went  into  storage  prior 
to  that  time  have  for  the  most  part  kept  in  prime  condition. 
In  many  fields,  however,  the  crop  was  pulled  and  allowed  to 
remain  on  the  ground  throughout  the  rainy  period,  and  during, 
that  time  a  serious  bacterial  rot  was  started,  which  since  has 
ruined  large  quantities  of  onions  in  storehouses.  Neck  rot, 
which  ordinarily  is  common  among  stored  onions,  has  been 
negligible  in  amount  this  year.  Owing  to  this  condition  the 
department's  investigation  of  onion  diseases  has  been  confined, 
for  the  most  part,  to  this  bacterial  rot  and  studies  in  the  coatrol 
of  smut.    Field  plots  are  planned  for  the  season  of  1919. 

It  is  worthy  of  note  that  serious  outbreaks  of  ''white  pickle," 
a  form  of  cucumber  mosaic  which  causes  stunting  and  de- 
formity of  cucumber  fruit,  occurred  at  several  points,  both 
out  of  doors  and  in  greenhouses.  This  is  a  physiological  disease 
related  to  mosaic  of  tobacco,  potato,  tomato  and  other  plants. 
Knowledge  of  the  disease  is  incomplete,  but  it  has  been  shown 
that  it  may  be  transmitted  through  the  agency  of  plant  lice 
and  possibly  other  insects,  and  that  control  measures  must 
include  insect  eradication  and  destruction  of  diseased  plants. 
The  disease  will  be  kept  under  observation,  and  it  may  become 
worth  while  to  institute  investigations  of  its  nature  and  control. 

In  addition  to  project  work,  many  activities  have  engaged 
the  attention  of  the  department  staff.  The  usual  amount  of 
seed  work,  examination  and  diagnosis  of  diseased  plant  ma- 
terials, identification  of  weeds  and  other  plants,  and  corre- 
spondence dealing  with  a  variety  of  subjects  are  some  of  the 
things  which  demanded  a  goodly  share  of  time.  The  appoint- 
ment of  an  extension  plant  pathologist,  noted  in  our  last 
annual  report,  has  relieved  the  writer  of  a  large  part  of  the 
responsibility  involved  in  correspondence  concerning  plant 
diseases,  and  at  the  same  time  this  feature  of  our  work  has 
greatly  increased.  The  plant  disease  survey  has  required  more 
attention  than  in  past  years,  and  several  members  of  the  staff 
were  appointed  assistant  collaborators  in  this  work  with  the 
Bureau  of  Plant  Industry. 

The  work  of  overhauling  and  cataloguing  the  mycological 
collection  has  been  completed  by  the  curator,  and  now  awaits 
the  purchase  of  additional  steel  cases  in  order  that  the  work 


26  a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 

of  filing  may  be  brought  to  completion.  It  is  hoped  that  this 
may  be  realized  the  present  year.  The  value  of  the  collection 
has  been  greatly  enhanced  through  the  easy  accessibility  which 
its  reorganization  has  brought  about,  and  it  now  stands  as  one 
of  the  chief  assets  of  the  department.  Mrs.  Wheeler  and  her 
predecessor,  Miss  Grace  B.  Nutting,  deserve  much  credit  for 
the  excellent  work  which  they  have  done  on  this  valuable 
collection. 


1919.1  PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  27  a 


DEPARTMENT  OF  CHEMISTRY. 


J.    B.    LINDSEY. 


It  is  customary  to  outline  briefly  the  work  accomplished  and 
in  progress  in  this  department  each  year.  The  following  report 
is  presented  for  1918. 

1.    Research  Section. 

Work  on  the  chemistry  of  butter  fat  has  been  continued.  A 
study  of  the  composition  of  the  fat  produced  by  four  cows  has 
been  partially  completed,  and  further  studies  along  the  same 
line  are  in  progress  to  ascertain  the  limits  of  variation  during 
different  stages  of  lactation. 

Considerable  time  has  been  devoted  to  preparation  of  work 
for  publication,  and  two  articles  have  appeared  in  the  ''Journal 
of  Agricultural  Research,"  one  relating  to  improved  methods  by 
esterification  for  the  determination  of  caproic,  caprylic,  capric, 
lauric  and  myristic  acids,  and  another  on  the  influence  of  air, 
light  and  moisture  on  the  stability  of  olive  oil.  The  observa- 
tions on  the  latter  subject  have  covered  a  period  of  six  years. 

In  co-operation  with  the  department  of  entomology,  a  pure 
crystalline  acid  calcium  arsenate  (CaHAs04.H20)  was  pre- 
pared in  quantity,  and  has  been  employed  in  experimental 
work.  A  description  of  the  method  of  preparation  has  been 
published  in  the  "Journal  of  Economic  Entomology." 

A  study  of  the  comparative  effects  of  sulfate  and  muriate  of 
potash  on  the  soil  of  Field  B  has  been  completed,  and  has 
resulted  in  the  finding  of  no  appreciable  differences  in  the 
chemical  properties  of  the  two  different  fertilizer  plots. 

A  preliminary  study  has  been  undertaken  of  the  changes 
which  occur  when  cranberries  are  stored.  It  has  been  found 
that  the  sugars  were  the  principal  group  of  constituents  affected, 


28  a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 

they  being  used  in  the  respiration  of  the  fruit.  Measurements 
of  the  rate  of  exhalation  of  carbon  dioxide  by  the  fruit  showed 
that  it  followed  the  law  of  acceleration  of  chemical  action  with 
rise  in  temperature.  Further  studies  on  a  number  of  varieties 
are  in  progress. 

Studies  of  the  residual  effects  of  liming  the  different  plots  of 
Field  A  to  which  various  fertilizers  have  been  applied  for  a 
series  of  years  has  shown  that  the  true  acidity  remains  nearly 
constant  for  several  years,  although  the  lime  content  steadily 
decreases.  Ammonium  sulfate  accelerates  the  leaching  of 
calcium,  while  nitrate  of  soda  serves  to  lessen  such  an  effect. 
Ammonium  sulfate  produces  a  noticeably  higher  hydrogen  ion 
concentration  in  the  soil  moisture  than  any  other  common 
fertilizer   material. 

An  experiment  in  the  protein  requirement  of  growing  calves 
has  been  in  progress  at  the  request  of  the  agricultural  committee 
of  the  Council  of  National  Defense.  The  experiment  was  begun 
in  January,  1918,  with  eight  calves,  and  was  completed  in 
July.  Four  of  the  calves  received  the  high,  and  four  the  low, 
protein  diet.  A  number  of  digestion  experiments  were  made 
as  the  experiment  progressed.  The  tabulated  data  showed  that 
the  calves  on  the  high  protein  diet  made  a  slightly  better 
growth  than  those  on  the  low  protein  diet,  although  observa- 
tions failed  to  detect  any  differences.  The  experiment  is  now 
being  repeated. 

Digestion  and  metabolizable  energy  experiments  with  horses 
have  been  in  progress  during  five  months  of  each  year 
since  1916,  and  the  following  feedstuffs  studied:  English  hay, 
alfalfa,  corn  bran,  wheat  bran,  brewers'  grains,  corn  meal, 
whole  corn,  and  rations  composed  of  corn,  oats,  bran  and 
brewers'  grains.  It  is  hoped  that  sufficient  data  will  soon  be 
accumulated  to  warrant  the  publication  of  a  bulletin  on  the 
subject. 

Digestion  trials  have  been  completed  with  sheep  on  velvet 
bean  meal,  carrots,  barley  screenings,  and  a  number  of  pro- 
prietary feed  mixtures.  The  results  will  be  published  as  soon 
as  circumstances  warrant. 

Two  experiments  have  been  completed  with  corn  bran  as  a 
component  of  a  grain  mixture  for  dairy  cows.     The  results  of 


1919. 


PUBLIC   DOCUMENT  — No.  31. 


29  a 


these  experiments,  together  with   those  on  alfalfa  and  rowen, 
are  now  in  press. 

Forage  crop  observations  are  continued  from  year  to  year. 
Observations  with  sweet  clover  and  Sudan  grass  confirmed 
previous  conclusions.  We  succeeded  the  past  year  in  getting  a 
second  growth  of  sweet  clover  by  cutting  just  before  the  first 
growth  began  to  bud.  The  second  growth  failed  for  two  pre- 
ceding years,  possibly  because  the  first  cutting  was  delayed 
a  little  too  long.  We  fail  to  see  any  use  for  this  crop  except 
as  a  soil  renovator.  One  crop  yearly  is  about  all  that  can 
be  secured.  Sudan  grass  proves  an  addition  to  our  list  of 
green  crops,  but  the  writer  fails  to  see  any  distinct  advantage 
to  it  over  barnyard  millet.  It  needs  hot  weather  for  its  de- 
velopment, and  the  seed  which  has  been  purchased  of  the  most 
reliable  dealers  has  not  proved  very  satisfactory.  A  rather 
better  second  crop  can  be  secured  than  with  barnyard  millet 
if  the  months  of  July  and  August  are  quite  warm. 

2.    Fertilizer  Section. 
The  work  of  the  fertilizer  section,  in  charge  of  Mr.  Haskins 
with  Messrs.  Walker  and  Pierce  as  assistants,  may  be  sum- 
marized as  follows:  — 

(a)     Fertilizers  registered. 
During    the    season    of    1918,    93    manufacturers,    importers 
and  dealers  have  registered  for  sale  408  brands  of  fertilizer, 
fertilizing  materials  and  agricultural  limes.     They  are  classed 
as  follows:  — 


Complete  fertilizers,   ..... 

123 

Ammoniated  superphosphates, 

163 

Ground  bone,  tankage  and  dry  ground  fish,  . 

37 

Wood  ashes,       ...... 

4 

Chemicals  and  organic  nitrogen  compounds, 

51 

Agricultural  limes,      ..... 

29 

Ground  rock,     ...... 

1 

408 


30  a 


EXPERIMENT  STATION. 


[Jan. 


(6)  Fertilizers  collected  and  analyzed. 
The  collection  comprised  981  samples  representing  380  dis- 
tinct brands.  In  making  this  collection  111  towns  and  322 
different  agents  were  visited;  17,784  sacks  were  sampled, 
representing  9,086  tons  of  fertilizer.  Six  hundred  and  eighteen 
analyses  have  been  made  during  the  year's  inspection,  al- 
though only  596  of  these  were  published  in  the  fertilizer 
bulletin.  The  analyses  not  published  were  largely  private 
fornxulas  not  offered  for  sale  and  not  registered,  but  were 
officially  collected.  The  registered  brands  analyzed  are  as 
follows:  — 


Brands. 


Complete  fertilizers,    ..... 

Ammoniated  superphosphates,  . 

Ground  bone,  tankage  and  dry  ground  fish, 

Nitrogen  compounds,  .... 

Phosphoric  acid  and  potash  compounds,   . 
Wood  ashes,  ...... 

Lime  compounds,        ..... 

Totals 


133 

108 

214 

151 

53 

35 

70 

24 

39 

25 

52 

4 

35 

25 

596 


372 


On  July  1,  1918,  a  new  supplementary  fertilizer  act  went 
into  effect.  Its  principal  features  are  provisions  for  the  col- 
lection of  a  6-cent  tonnage  fee  which  is  supplementary  to  the 
usual  registration  fee.  It  provides  somewhat  greater  freedom 
to  the  executive  in  prescribing  and  enforcing  such  rules  and 
regulations  as  may  be  necessary  to  the  smooth  working  of  the 
act,  and  defines  certain  conditions  in  composition  of  the  fer- 
tilizer product  which  must  be  fulfilled  or  registration  may  be 
refused.  The  full  text  of  the  act,  as  well  as  complete  details 
regarding  the  fertilizer  inspection  work,  will  be  found  in 
Bulletin  No.  9,  Control  Series,  published  in  October,  1918. 


(c)     Further  Work  of  the  Fertilizer  Section. 
Time  has  been  found  during  the  season,  when  it  would  not 
interfere  with   the  regular  fertilizer  inspection   work,   for   the 
analysis  of  the  usual  variety  of  fertilizing  by-products  forwarded 


1919.]  PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  31a 

by  farmers.  During  the  winter  months  the  usual  co-operative 
analytical  work  has  been  accomplished  for  the  agricultural 
department  to  complete  studies  both  in  the  field  and  in  pots. 
This  work  may  be  summarized  briefly  as  follows:  — 

Dry  matter  and  nitrogen  determinations  and  complete  ash  analysis  in 

duplicate  on  5  samples  of  corn  grain  and  5  samples  of  corn  stover. 
Dry  matter,  nitrogen,  potassium  oxide  and  sodium  oxide  determinations 

in  duplicate  on  5  samples  of  corn  cob. 
Dry  matter  and  nitrogen  determinations  and  ash  analysis  in  duplicate 

on  IS  samples  of  cabbage. 
Dry  matter  determinations  on  7  samples  of  cabbage. 
Dry  matter,  nitrogen  and  potassium  oxide  determinations  in  duplicate 

on  10  samples  of  strawberries. 
Weights  and  dry  matter  determinations  on  264  samples  each  of  millet 

seed  and  straw. 
Weights,  dry  matter  and  duplicate  nitrogen  determinations  on  57  samples 

each  of  millet  seed  and  straw. 
Weights,  dry  matter,  nitrogen  and  potassium  oxide  determinations  in 

duplicate  on  60  samples  of  miUet  seed  and  straw. 
Weights,  dry  matter,  nitrogen,  potassium  oxide  and  phosphoric  acid 

determinations  in  duplicate  on  12  samples  each  of  millet  seed  and 

straw. 
Weights,  dry  matter,  nitrogen  and  phosphoric  acid  determinations  in 

duplicate  on  12  samples  of  millet  seed  and  straw. 

Two  hundred  and  seventy-four  different  substances  have 
been  received  and  analyzed  for  farmers  and  various  depart- 
ments of  the  experiment  station,  and  may  be  grouped  as 
follows:  — 

Fertilizers  and  fertilizer  by-products,    ......     149 

Lime  products,  .........        3 

Soils  for  lime  requirements  and  organic  matter  tests,      .         .         .     122 


274 


(d)     Vegetation  Tests. 

A  pot  experiment  has  been  conducted  with  millet,  compris- 
ing 12  pots,  to  study  the  effect  of  a  mixture  of  peat,  phosphate 
rock  and  lime  treated  with  bacteria  by  a  patented  process. 

A  field  experiment  with  corn,  comprising  15  one-fortieth 
acre  plots,  has  been  conducted  to  study  the  value  of  a  ground 
rock  known  as  Nature's  Plant  Food,  and  also  a  mixture  of 


32  a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 

apatite  and  barium  sulfide,  known    as  Barium-Phosphate,   as 
sources  of  plant  food. 

Co-operative  field  experiments  have  also  been  conducted  by 
county  agricultural  agents  in  four  different  parts  of  the  State 
with  a  variety  of  crops,  and  an  experiment  with  carrots  has 
been  conducted  on  the  experiment  station  grounds  to  study 
the  value  of  Nature's  Plant  Food  as  a  fertilizer.  The  dry 
matter  determinations  on  these  crops  have  not  as  yet  been 
completed. 

3.    Feed  and  Dairy  Section. 

(a)     The  Feeding  Stuffs  Law  (Ads  and  Resolves  for  1912, 
Chapter  527). 

During  the  past  year  176  dealers  located  in  108  different 
towns  were  visited  at  least  once,  and  about  1,200  samples  of 
feeding  stuffs  W'ere  collected  and  analyzed.  One  thousand, 
two  hundred  and  forty-six  brands  of  feeding  stuffs  were  regis- 
tered for  sale,  not  all  of  which,  however,  were  found  by  the 
inspectors. 

It  is  to  the  credit  of  the  manufacturers  and  dealers  that  few 
violations  of  the  feeding  stuffs  law  came  to  our  attention, 
even  under  the  unfavorable  conditions  due  to  the  war.  Early 
in  the  year  one  dealer  was  prosecuted  and  found  guilty  for 
selling  a  so-called  meat  scrap  decidedly  below  guarantee. 

Further  details  regarding  the  feeding  stuffs  inspection  will 
be  found  in  Bulletin  No.  10,  Control  Series. 

(6)     The  Dairy  Law  {Acts  and  Resolves  for  1912,  Chapter  218). 

(1)  Examination  for  Certificates. — Twenty  applicants  have 
been  examined  and  found  proficient. 

(2)  Inspection  of  Glassware.  —  Three  thousand,  one  hundred 
and  twenty  pieces  of  Babcock  glassware  have  been  tested 
for  accuracy,  of  which  10  were  condemned. 

Following  is  a  summary  for  the  last  eighteen  years:  — 


1919.1 


PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31. 


33  a 


Year. 


Number  of 
Pieces  tested. 


Number  of 

Pieces 
condemned. 


Percentage 
condemned. 


1901, 
1902, 
1903, 
1904, 
1905, 
1906, 
1907, 
1908, 
1909, 
1910, 
1911, 
1912, 
1913, 
1914, 
1915, 
1916, 
1917, 
1918, 

Totals, 


5,041 
2,344 
2,240 
2,026 
1,665 
2,457 
3,082 
2,713 
4,071 
4,047 
4,466 
6,056 
6,394 
6,336 
4,956 
5,184 
7,522 
3,120 


291 

56 

57 

200 

197 

763 

204 

33 

43 

41 

12 

27 

34 

18 

4 

5 


5.77 

2.40 

2.54 

9.87 

11.83 

31.05 

6.62 

1.22 

1.06 

1.01 

.27 

.45 

.53 

.28 

.08 

.10 

.11 

.32 


73,720 


2,003 


(3)  Inspection  of  Machines  and  Apparatus.  —  During  the 
months  of  November  and  December,  Mr.  J.  T.  Howard,  the 
authorized  deputy,  inspected  the  machines  and  apparatus 
in  82  milk  depots,  creameries  and  milk  inspection  laboratories. 
One  machine  was  condemned,  and  minor  repairs  ordered  in 
several  others. 

FolloW'ing  is  a  list  of  creameries,  milk  depots  and  milk 
inspectors'  laboratories  visited  in  1918. 

1.     Creameries. 


Location. 

Name. 

Manager  or  Proprietor. 

1. 

Amherst,     .... 

Amherst, 

R.  W.  Pease,  proprietor. 

2. 

Ashfield 

Ashfield  Co-operative, 

Wm.  Hunter,  manager. 

3. 

Cummington,     . 

Cummington  Co-operative, 

D.  C.  Morey,  manager. 

4. 

Easthampton,     . 

Hampton  Co-operative, 

W.  S.  Wilcox,  manager. 

5. 

Monterey, 

Berkshire  Hills  Co-operative, 

F.  A.  Campbell,  manager. 

6. 

Northfield, 

Northfield  Co-operative,     . 

C.  C.  Stearns,  manager. 

7 

Shelburne, 

Shelburne  Co-operative, 

W.  C.  Webber,  manager. 

34  a 


EXPERIMENT  STATION. 


[Jan. 


2.     Milk  Depots. 


Location. 

Name. 

Manager. 

1.  Boston 

Alden  Brothers  Branch, 

VVm.  Johnson. 

2.  Boston  (Dorchester), 

Elm  Farm  Milk  Company, 

J.  K.  Knapp. 

3.  Boston,      . 

T.  P.  Grant  Company, 

T.  P.  Grant. 

4.  Boston  (Charlestown), 

H.  P.  Hood  &  Sons 

N.  C.  Davis. 

5.  Boston  (Charlestown), 

H.  P.  Hood  &  Sons,  No.  2, 

N.  C.  Davis. 

6.  Boston  (Dorchester), 

Morgan  Brothers,         .... 

A.  G.  Johnson. 

7.  Boston, 

Oak  Grove  Farm,         .... 

J.  Alden. 

8.  Boston,      . 

Plymouth  Creamery  Company, 

VV.  J.  Gardner. 

9.  Boston  (Charlestown), 

Rockingham  Milk  Company, 

C.  A.  Bray. 

10.  Boston  (Charlestown), 

Turner  Center  Dairying  Association, 

I.  L.  Smith. 

11.  Boston  (Charlestown), 

D.  Whiting  &  Sons,     .... 

J.  K.  Whiting. 

12.  Boston  (Jamaica  Plain), 

Westwood  Farm  Milk  Company, 

V.  E.  Clem. 

13.  Cambridge, 

C.  Brigham  &  Son 

J.  K.  Whiting. 

14.  Conway,    . 

H.  P.  Hood  &  Sons 

W.  E.  Roberts. 

15.  East  Watertown, 

Lyndonville  Creamery  Association,    . 

H.  A.  Smith. 

16.  Everett,     . 

Frank  E.  Boyd 

F.  E.  Boyd. 

17.  Everett,     . 

Hampden  Creamery  Company, 

R.  T.  Mooney. 

18.  Lawrence, 

Jersey  Ice  Cream  Company, 

J.  N.  Gurdy. 

19.  Lawrence, 

Turner  Centre  Dairying  Association, 

F.  M.  Barr. 

20.  Lawrence, 

VVillardale  Creamery 

F.  H.  Willard. 

21.  North  Egremont, 

Willowbrook  Dairy,     .... 

D.  Nanninga. 

22.  Sheffield,  . 

Willowbrook  Dairy,     .... 

F.  B.  Percy. 

23.  Shelburne  Falls. 

H.  P.  Hood  &  Sons,    . 

R.  E.  Wetherbee. 

24.  Southborough,  . 

Deerfoot  Farms,           .... 

S.  H.  Howes. 

25.  Somerville, 

Seven  Oaks  Dairy  Company, 

A.  B.  Parker. 

26.  Somerville, 

Acton  Farms  Milk  Company,     . 

T.  Colgan. 

27.  Springfield, 

Tait  Brothers 

H.  Tait. 

28.  Waltham,  . 

Manhattan  Creamery, 

A.  W.  Jenkins. 

29.  West  Lynn, 

H.  P.  Hood  &  Sons 

N.  C.  Davis. 

1919. 


PUBLIC   DOCUMENT  — No.  31. 


35  a 


S.     Milk  hispectms. 


Location. 


1.  Amesbury, 

2.  Amherst,    . 

3.  Arlington, 

4.  Attleboro,  . 

5.  Barnstable, 

6.  Boston, 

7.  Brockton,  . 

8.  Cambridge, 

9.  Chelsea, 

10.  Chicopee,  . 

11.  Clinton,      . 

12.  Dedham,    . 

13.  Everett, 

14.  Fall  River, 

15.  Fitchburg, 

16.  Framingham, 

17.  Gardner,    . 

18.  Greenfield, 

19.  Haverhill, 

20.  Holyoke,    . 

21.  Lawrence,  . 

22.  Lowell, 

23.  Lynn, 


Inspector. 


J.  L.  Stewart. 
P.  H.  Smith. 
A.  Bain. 

P.  C.  Blatchford. 
G.  T.  Mecarta. 
J.  O.  Jordan. 
G.  E.  Boiling. 
VV.  A.  Noonan. 
W.  S.  Walkley. 

C.  J.  O'Brien. 
P.  S.  Grady. 

E.  Knobel. 
E.G.  Colby. 
H.  Boisseau. 

J.  F.  Bresnahan. 

F.  S.  Dodson. 
H.  O.  Knight. 

G.  P.  Moore. 
J.  A.  Ruel. 

D.  Hartnett. 
J.  H.  Tobin. 
M.  Marster. 
H.  P.  Bennett. 


Location. 


24.  Maiden,     . 

25.  Millbury, 

26.  New  Bedford, 

27.  Newton,  . 

28.  North  Adams, 

29.  Northampton, 

30.  Pittsfield, 

31.  Plain ville, 

32.  Plymouth, 

33.  Revere,     . 

34.  Salem, 

35.  Somerville, 

36.  South  Hadley, 

37.  Springfield, 

38.  Taunton, 

39.  Waltham, 

40.  Ware, 

41.  Watertown, 

42.  Wellesley, 

43.  Westfield, 

44.  Winchendon, 

45.  Woburn,   . 

46.  Worcester, 


Inspector. 


J.  A.  Sanford. 

F.  A.  Watkins. 
H.  B.  Hamilton. 

A.  C.  Hudson. 

C.  T.  Quackenbush. 

G.  R.  Turner. 

B.  M.  Collins. 
J.  J.  Eiden. 
W.  E.  Briggs. 
J.  E.  Lamb. 

J.  J.  McGrath. 
H.  E.  Bowman. 
G.  F.  Beaudreau. 
S.  C.  Downs. 
L.  C.  Tucker. 
G.  D.  Affleck. 

F.  E.  Marsh. 
L.  Simonds. 
W.  A.  Berger. 
H.  F.  Moody. 

G.  W.  Stanbridge. 

D.  F.  Callahan. 
G.  L.  Berg. 


4.     Miscellaneous. 


L0C.\^TI0N. 

Name. 

Manager. 

1.  Boston, 

2.  Boston 

Walker-Gordon  Laboratory, 
Boston  Laboratories,  Inc.,  . 

B.  W.  Nichols. 
J.  E.  Oslin. 

(c)  Water. 
Fifty  samples  of  water  received  in  containers  furnished  by 
the  experiment  station  were  analyzed.  A  fee  of  $3  is  charged 
for  this  service,  and  application  for  the  analysis  must  be  made 
in  advance.  Water  from  public  supplies  is  not  analyzed, 
being  under  the  jurisdiction  of  the  State  Department  of 
Health. 


36  a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 


(d)     Other  Work. 

In  connection  with  the  work  required  under  the  preceding 
headings  this  department  has  continued  to  analyze  samples 
of  milk,  cream  and  feeds  sent  by  residents  of  the  State  where 
circumstances  would  appear  to  warrant  the  procedure.  Work 
is  not  done,  however,  which  belongs  more  properly  to  a  com- 
mercial chemist.  During  the  year  226  feeds,  543  milks,  430 
creams,  1  condensed  milk  and  26  vinegars  have  been  analj^zed. 
One  hundred  and  forty-five  feeds  and  163  samples  of  milk 
have  been  analyzed  in  connection  with  feeding  experiments 
conducted  by  the  experiment  station. 

Seventy-three  moisture  tests  on  corn  have  also  been  made 
for  the  purpose  of  determining  yield  on  a  uniform  basis  for 
corn  contests  conducted  by  the  State  Department  of  Agricul- 
ture and  the  Massachusetts  Society  for  the  Promotion  of 
Agriculture. 

An  investigation  was  also  conducted  to  determine  the  most 
accurate  method  for  determining  butter  fat  in  condensed  milk 
and  ice  cream. 

Work  included  under  this  heading  supplements  the  work 
required  under  the  feed  and  dairy  laws,  and  can  be  done  at 
such  a  time  as  to  keep  equipment  and  staff  utilized  during  the 
entire  year. 

(e)  Testing  of  Pure-bred  Cows  for  Advanced  Registry. 
Four  men  have  been  given  regular  employment  in  conduct- 
ing yearly  tests  of  Jersey,  Guernsey,  Ayrshire  and  Shorthorn 
cows,  and,  in  addition,  extra  men  are  employed  as  occasion 
demands.  This  work  requires  the  presence  of  a  supervisor 
at  a  farm  for  at  least  two  days  each  month.  The  two-day 
test  period  forms  a  basis  for  computing  the  monthly  milk 
and  fat  yield  reported  by  the  breeders  direct  to  their  respective 
cattle  clubs.  This  work  is  done  at  cost,  and  the  funds  re- 
ceived kept  in  separate  account  by  the  experiment  station 
treasurer.  As  the  work  must  be  self-supporting,  breeders  are 
required  to  pay  for  tests  before  papers  are  forwarded  to  tfie 
cattle  clubs.  Following  is  a  monthly  summary  of  the  work 
for  the  two-day  yearly  tests:  — 


1919. 


PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31. 


37  a 


-ii 
% 


0^ 


O 

t^ 

00 

CO 

-t* 

t^ 

^ 

•V 

•w 

-* 

■^ 

•^ 

•^ 

■^ 

rr 

^ 

M* 

•^ 

»o 

^H 

"S  c 

„ 

^ 

^ 

^ 

^^ 

^ 

^ 

,^ 

^ 

^^ 

1 

1 

, 

a 

Q 

E4 

fri 

t-t 

2 

C3     • 

&  2 

1 

1 

I 

1 

I 

1 

I 

1 

1 

1 

1 

> 

a; 

2& 

KM 

g 

O 

oo 

00 

00 

00 

00 

t- 

t^ 

00 

Ol 

t^ 

O 

o 

1 

K 

t^ 

H 

>> 

n 

< 

s 

>, 

c^ 

03 

en 

02 

CO 

o 

o 

Oi 

o 

ci 

o 

02 

1 

<a 

.-H 

u, 

o 

>-5 

>> 

CO 

ro 

02 

o 

00 

en 

oo 

CO 

1^ 

j^ 

CO 

(^ 

1 

c 

(M 

IM 

Oi 

Oi 

© 

3 

O 

"3 

lO 

o 

r^ 

f 

>« 

»o 

(M 

CO 

■<»• 

t^ 

t^ 

CO 

r- 

>-o 

CO 

CO 

o 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

co 

CO 

CO 

CO 

!N 

CI 

^ 

H 

■<s^ 

t-    ^ 

(M 

lO 

o 

C-J 

oo 

CO 

t^ 

OS 

1 

1 

(M 

(M 

(M 

C^ 

CI 

CM 

ec 

-2| 

<M 

d 

» 

tc 

m 

H 

C  _; 

&  2 

2S 

« 

CO 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

i 

1 

1 

1 

1 

o 

o 

pqw 

O 

O 

£ 

C-J 

O! 

CO 

o 

« 

^ 

o 

t^ 

t^ 

t^ 

c^ 

t^ 

•o 

CO 

CO 

CO 

» 

;h 

00 

B 

>> 

< 

>. 

oo 

C5 

•* 

OO 

cn 

CO 

>o 

00 

>0 

^ 

o 

»o 

CO 

t^ 

CO 

t^ 

00 

OJ 

o 

00- 

CO 

£ 

o 

© 

1-3 

t~ 

Ol 

CO 

o 

>o 

lO 

CO 

in 

o 

^^ 

o 

00 

OS 

a 

t^ 

QO 

o 

05 

00 

t- 

CO 

t^ 

■o 

ii 

o 

o 

3 

cq' 

a 

«  S 

::  O 

E  3 

CO    ^^    OJ 

CO 

a> 

o 

00 

^ 

•^ 

CO 

00 

«o 

CO 

"O 

C! 

1 

VlSO 

Whol 
Pa 
Tin 

3M 

ta 

o 

o 

_. 

. 

i 

01 

£ 

S 

J2 

1 
p 

3 

i-s 

2 

03 

c 

1-3 

3 

1-3 

3 

3 
< 

s 

ft 

1 

O 

Xi 

i 

> 
o 

3 

o 

38a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 

The  Holstein  tests,  usually  based  on  a  seven  or  thirty  day 
period,  require  the  presence  of  a  supervisor  during  the  entire 
test.  During  the  year  25  different  men  have  been  employed 
in  these  short  tests,  and  160  seven-day,  25  fourteen-day  and 
42  thirty-day  tests,  making  a  total  of  227,  have  been  com- 
pleted.   This  work  was  conducted  at  23  different  farms. 

4.  NuMEKicAL  Summary  of  Laboratory  Work,  December, 
1917,  to  December,  1918. 

There  have  been  received  and  tested  50  samples  of  water, 
543  of  milk,  430  of  cream,  1  of  condensed  milk,  3  of  butter, 
226  of  feedstuff's,  149  of  fertilizer,  122  of  soil,  3  of  lime  prod- 
ucts, 2  of  organic  substances  for  arsenic,  26  of  vinegar,  1  of 
coal,  2  of  arsenate  of  lead,  73  moisture  tests  on  corn  for  corn 
contests,  and  4  miscellaneous. 

The  fertilizer  control  work  involved  the  collection  of  981 
samples,  and  the  feed  control,  1,200  samples.  There  have 
also  been  examined,  in  connection  with  experiments  made  by 
the  diff'erent  departments  of  the  station,  163  samples  of  milk; 
145  of  cattle  feed;  44  of  feces  and  35  of  urine;  mineral  analyses 
on  5  samples  each  of  corn  grain,  stover  and  cob,  on  18  samples 
of  cabbages,  and  on  10  samples  of  strawberries;  weights  and 
dry  matter  determinations  on  264  samples  each  of  millet 
straw  and  seed;  weights,  dry  matter  and  nitrogen  determina- 
tions on  57  samples  each  of  millet  seed  and  straw;  weights, 
dry  matter  and  nitrogen  determinations  and  partial  mineral 
analyses  on  144  samples  each  of  millet  seed  and  straw.  The 
above  totals  5,175  samples,  and  does  not  include  the  work  of 
the  research  section,  cow  testing  or  the  dairy  law. 


1919.1  PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  39a 


DEPARTMENT  OF  ENTOMOLOGY. 


H.    T.    FERNALD   AND    A.    I.    BOURNE. 


During  1918  the  attention  of  the  workers  in  this  department 
Avas  largely  taken  up  with  the  continuation  of  investigations 
already  under  way,  and  in  the  attempt  to  solve  problems  of 
immediate  importance.  During  the  absence  on  leave  (till 
May  1)  of  the  head  of  the  department,  the  direction  and  execu- 
tion of  the  work  was  in  charge  of  Mr.  Bourne,  who  conducted 
it  in  a  most  satisfactory  way.  The  death  of  Mr.  S.  C.  Vinal 
in  September  put  an  end  to  further  work  on  the  European 
corn  borer  by  the  station.  The  results  of  that  work  are 
referred  to  later  in  this  report.  His  death  has  been  a  serious 
blow  to  the  progress  of  the  work  of  this  department,  for  he 
was  a  man  of  great  promise,  and  the  researches  he  had  already 
made  were  of  much  value.  No  steps  have  thus  far  been  taken 
to  fill  his  position. 

Correspondence  during  the  year  has  been  larger  than  usual, 
and  requests  to  visit  different  places  for  personal  inspection 
and  advice  as  to  the  treatment  of  insects  present  have  been 
many.  These  visits  have  been  to  gardens,  orchards,  city 
parks  and  other  places  in  various  parts  of  the  State,  and  have 
covered  a  wide  range  of  insects.  Telephone  calls  for  advice 
have  also  been  very  numerous,  and  with  the  correspondence 
and  inspections  have  taken  much  time.  The  assignment  of 
Mr.  Q.  S.  Lowry  to  this  State  as  a  United  States  Extension 
Service  agent  has,  to  some  extent,  relieved  the  station  staff 
of  this  work,  but  there  were  periods  when  every  one  was 
occupied  in  these  lines  for  days  at  a  time.  Demonstrational 
work  on  the  control  of  particular  insect  pests  was  frequently 
requested,  and  a  number  of  demonstrations  were  made  during 
the  season.  Several  houses  were  fumigated  with  hydrocyanic 
acid  gas,  at  the  request  of  their  owners,  for  relief  from  various 
household  pests. 


40  a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 

A  plot  of  land  conveniently  located  near  the  laboratory 
was  obtained  last  spring  for  use  as  a  garden,  and  here  the 
various  garden  pests  were  studied  and  methods  for  their 
control  tested  under  conditions  which  could  be  determined 
and  to  some  extent  regulated.  The  results  were  so  satisfactory 
that  this  w^ork  will  be  continued. 

Tests  of  the  standard  insecticides  to  determine  their  action 
and  the  causes  of  burning  of  foliage  have  been  continued.  Pure 
materials  have  been  tested  until  we  know  what  to  expect 
from  them.  Commercial  brands  are  now  being  tried  in  the 
same  way.  The  past  year  has  shown  that  arsenite  of  lime 
cannot  be  safely  recommended  for  use  under  conditions  such 
as  usually  are  present  with  the  sprayer,  too  many  precautions 
being  required  to  obtain  safety.  Further  study  of  this  sub- 
stance has,  therefore,  been  discontinued,  and  arsenate  of  lime 
has  been  taken  up  in  its  place. 

Work  on  the  digger  wasps  as  parasites  has  made  good 
progress,  but  a  topic  of  this  nature  demands  either  the  entire 
attention  of  the  worker,  or  a  long  period  before  final  results 
can  be  expected.  The  former  not  being  possible  here  under 
existing  conditions,  no  results  are  as  yet  ready  to  report. 

The  study  of  the  European  corn  borer  was  begun  in  1917 
by  the  late  Mr.  S.  C.  Vinal,  who  continued  it  till  his  death 
in  September,  1918.  The  records  and  observations  he  made 
have  been  brought  together  by  Mr.  D.  J.  Caffrey  of  the 
United  States  Bureau  of  Entomology,  who  was  also  working 
on  some  phases  of  the  problem  under  a  co-operative  agreement 
between  the  station  and  the  bureau,  and  are  now  ready  for 
publication. 

Investigations  as  to  methods  for  controlling  the  onion 
maggot,  continued  from  previous  years,  were  practically 
limited  in  1918  to  tests  of  the  success  of  traps  in  catching 
the  adult  flies.  Six  traps  were  placed  in  an  area  of  about 
one-fourth  of  an  acre,  and  during  the  months  of  INIay  and 
June  about  48,000  flies  were  captured,  about  4,500  of  which 
were  those  of  the  onion  maggot.  While  it  cannot  be  claimed 
that  these  flies  were  taken  before,  rather  than  after,  their 
eggs  had  been  laid,  the  fact  that  this  field  was  practically 
free   from    the   maggots   may    have   some   significance   in   this 


1919.]  PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  41a 

connection.      These  experiments  will  be  continued    and    elabo- 
rated. 

Observations  to  determine  the  existence  and,  if  present,  the 
importance  of  a  second  brood  of  the  codling  moth  in  Massa- 
chusetts have  been  made  for  a  number  of  years.  The  con- 
clusion had  about  been  reached  that  no  second  brood  is  present 
in  more  than  a  few  scattered  individuals.  Last  summer, 
however,  a  brood  of  considerable  size  was  noted,  and  it  has 
been  decided  to  carry  these  observations  further. 

For  ten  years  the  dates  of  appearance  of  the  young  of 
several  of  the  common  scale  insects  have  been  recorded  in 
the  hope  that  the  range  in  this  time,  even  in  the  most  widely 
different  seasons,  would  not  be  so  great  as  to  prevent  the 
fixation  of  a  date  for  treatment  to  be  given  them.  A  study 
of  the  results  has  now  finally  destroyed  this  hope,  but  has 
unexpectedly  pointed  out  a  new  aspect  of  the  subject  which 
may  lead  to  equally  desirable  results  though  in  a  totally 
different  way.  This  subject,  therefore,  is  being  continued, 
to  obtain  more  data  for  use  with  the  new  basis  of  research. 

At  the  request  of  the  Food  Administration,  tests  of  a  material 
known  as  Nature's  Plant  Food  were  made  to  ascertain  its 
value,  if  any,  as  an  insecticide  and  also  as  an  insect  repellent. 
About  20  tests  were  made  with  this  substance  on  7  different 
kinds  of  insects,  both  under  laboratory  and  field  conditions, 
with  check  tests  in  all  cases.  The  evidence  obtained  from 
these  experiments  was  that  the  material  is  not  an  insecticide. 
As  a  repellent,  it  was  compared  with  ground  limestone  and 
sifted  road  dust.  The  tests  indicated  that  its  value  as  a 
repellent  is  no  greater  and  no  less  than  that  of  any  other 
inert  substance  of  equal  fineness  and  adhesiveness  and  applied 
in  the  same  amounts.  Where  these  factors  are  equal,  the 
selection  of  the  material  to  use  should  be  entirely  on  the  basis 
of  cost. 

Several  ''proprietary  insecticides"  of  unknown  value  have 
been  tested  during  the  year.  Kling  Kill  Insecticide,  put  out 
by  the  Commercial  Chemical  Company,  St.  Paul,  Minn.,  and 
claimed  by  its  manufacturers  to  incorporate  several  new  and 
radical  ideas  in  insecticide  manufacture,  was  given  some  atten- 
tion.    The  absence  of  copper  and  lead  from  its  composition 


42a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 

seemed  to  make  it  particularly  worth  testing,  these  substances 
being  at  the  time  so  costly  because  of  war  conditions.  It 
proved  to  be  a  very  slow  poison  even  when  larvae  had  eaten 
very  freely  of  sprayed  leaves,  requiring  about  twice  as  long 
to  become  effective  as  a  standard  arsenate  of  lead.  On  the 
other  hand,  it  appeared  to  be  slightly  repellent  to  young 
larvfe.  When  applied  at  the  minimum  strength  recommended 
by  the  manufacturers,  leaf  injury,  even  on  mature  leaves, 
always  followed;  when  applied  at  an  increased  strength  to 
obtain  killing  efficiency  equal  to  that  of  a  standard  spray, 
the  burning  became  so  serious  that  its  use  was  out  of  the 
ciuestion. 

The  scarcity  of  nicotine  sulfate  (fiorty  per  cent)  in  some 
parts  of  the  State  during  the  time  when  the  potato  aphis  was 
abundant  led  to  the  use  of  many  substances  as  substitutes. 
Among  these  was  sulpho-napthol  (now  spelled  Sylpho-Nathol), 
which  was  frequently  used  and  sometimes  highly  recommended. 
To  ascertain  whether  this  material  had  any  real  value  for 
this  purpose  a  series  of  tests  was  made,  both  in  the  laboratory 
and  in  the  garden.  The  results  indicate  that,  to  be  of  any 
value  against  plant  lice,  Sylpho-Nathol  must  be  used  as  strong 
as  13^  fluid  ounces  per  gallon  of  water.  At  this  strength, 
however,  burning  of  the  leaves  always  occurred,  and  though 
the  plants  often  recovered  and  made  new  growth,  the  check 
they  suffered  was  as  great  as  would  have  been  produced  by 
the  plant  lice  unless  these  were  unusually  abundant. 

Plant  Lice  Killer,  manufactured  by  the  Sterling  Chemical 
Company,  was  also  tested  to  some  extent,  though  not  available 
until  rather  late  in  the  season  for  complete  data,  the  object 
being  to  determine  the  best  dilution  for  aphid  control  and  its 
value  for  this  purpose.  Considerable  difficulty  was  met  with 
in  preparing  the  material  for  use,  owing  to  its  oily  nature, 
and,  when  prepared,  constant  agitation  was  necessary  to 
keep  it  from  separating  out  of  the  mixture.  It  was  found, 
however,  when  properly  mixed  and  maintained,  to  be  a  very 
effective  material  for  use  with  aphids,  —  proportions  of  1 
to  15  and  1  to  20  of  water  killing  practically  all  the  insects 
reached,  and  1  to  30  killing  about  90  per  cent  of  them.  On 
foliage,  the  strength  of  1  to  15  injured  only  the  most  tender 


1919.]  PUBLIC   DOCUMFAT  — No.  31.  43a 

leaves,  though  twelve  types  were  tested,  including  most  of 
the  common  garden  plants  and  several  kinds  of  trees.  When 
applied  at  1  to  20  no  injury  to  any  foliage  was  observed. 

In  such  tests  as  here  reported  for  Kling  Kill  Insecticide, 
Sylpho-Nathol,  Nature's  Plant  Food  and  Plant  Lice  Killer, 
attention  should  be  called  to  the  fact  that  tests  of  any  material 
made  during  only  one  season,  and,  of  course,  on  a  relatively 
small  scale,  should  not  be  regarded  as  conclusive,  but  merely 
as  indicating  the  probable  value  of  the  material.  Frequently, 
too,  manufacturers,  after  the  tests  of  one  season,  change  or 
modify  their  formulas  so  that  tests  another  year  might  give 
different  results  for  this  reason. 

A  series  of  parallel  tests  was  conducted  during  the  summer 
of  1918  with  home-made  Bordeaux  mixture,  Pyrox  and  Insecto, 
to  determine  their  value  against  potato  pests.  Nicotine 
sulfate  40  per  cent  in  1  to  800  dilution  was  added  to  each  of 
these  during  the  potato  plant  louse  period  of  activity.  The 
Insecto  had  rather  poor  suspension  ciualities  as  compared 
with  the  other  two,  giving  poor  distribution  on  the  plants, 
and  frequently  clogging  the  nozzle.  The  best  distribution 
was  obtained  with  the  home-made  Bordeaux,  but  Pyrox  was 
not  far  behind  in  this  regard.  The  flea  beetles  were  well 
controlled  by  all  three  materials,  and  the  nicotine  sulfate 
combined  without  difficulty  with  them  all  and  was  efficient 
against  the  plant  lice.  Although  not  entomological  in  nature, 
it  may  be  stated  that  the  rows  to  which  the  home-made 
Bordeaux  was  applied  kept  green  and  alive  the  longest  and 
produced  the  largest  crop;    those  treated  with  Pyrox,  next. 


44  a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 


DEPARTMENT   OF   HORTICULTURE. 


J.    K.    SHAW   AND    H.    F.    TOMPSON. 


Work  in  Pomology. 

Dr.  Shaw  makes  the  following  report  of  the  work  in 
pomology :  — 

Investigation  work  in  this  department  has  proceeded  along 
lines  previously  laid  down.  Absence  on  sabbatical  leave  from 
September  1  and  the  lack  of  a  graduate  assistant  have  reduced 
the  amount  of  work  done  during  the  year,  but  with  the  return 
of  normal  conditions  this  will  be  soon  regained. 

Work  on  the  plant  breeding  project  was  practically  con- 
cluded with  the  publication  of  Bulletin  No.  185,  on  "The 
Inheritance  of  Seed  Coat  Color  in  Garden  Beans."  There 
are  other  data  on  hand  which  may,  on  study,  be  deemed  worthy 
of  publication. 

Observations  on  local  variations  in  temperature  were  con- 
tinued by  the  transfer  of  the  equipment  from  eastern  Hampden 
County  to  stations  in  Amherst  and  vicinity. 

The  root  and  scion  orchard  continued  to  make  fair  growth, 
and  should  yield  data  of  increasing  interest  and  value.  A 
reserve  stock  of  trees  for  replacing  any  that  may  die  is  being 
maintained.  Data  on  the  propagation  of  known  roots  of 
trees  will  be  available  for  publication  the  coming  spring. 

An  orchard  of  100  trees  for  future  use  in  the  peach  breeding 
project  was  planted,  but  no  actual  breeding  work  was  possible, 
owing  to  the  destruction  of  the  buds  by  severe  cold.  Prospects 
are  now  favorable  for  active  work  the  coming  season. 

Owing  to  lack  of  assistance  little  was  done  on  the  variety 
study  project,  but  active  work  will  be  undertaken  the  coming 
year. 

In  the  pruning  experiment  a  few  trees  of  the  Baldwin, 
Rhode  Island  Greening  and  King  varieties  were  killed  back 
by  the  severe  cold,  but  all  such  trees  have  started  up  anew, 


1919.]  PUBLIC   DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  45a 

and  the  type  of  pruning  designed  for  them  may  be  again 
applied.  Most  of  the  trees  made  an  excellent  growth,  and 
the  effects  of  the  different  methods  of  pruning  are  beginning 
to  appear. 

The  extreme  cold  of  the  winter  of  1917-18  is  without  prece- 
dent, and  we  may  hope  that  it  will  not  occur  again  for  many 
years.  Lower  minimum  temperatures  have  occurred,  but  the 
number  of  extremely  cold  days  greatly  exceeded  that  of  any 
other  winter  on  record.  The  records  of  the  meteorological 
department  show  twenty-three  days  with  a  temperature  of 
zero  or  lower;  of  these,  twelve  were  — 10°  or  lower  and 
4  were  — 15°  or  lower,  while  the  minimum  of  — 22.5°  occurred 
on  both  Dec.  30,  1917,  and  Feb.  2,  1918.  Severe  cold  began 
about  December  10  and  continued  almost  without  interruption 
until  February  24. 

Such  severe  weather  must  cause  great  damage  to  the  fruit 
interests.  The  peach  crop  was  practically  all  destroyed 
throughout  the  State,  and  there  was  considerable  injury  to 
the  trees.  Many  Baldwin  apple  trees  were  killed  outright 
or  severely  injured,  and  there  was  more  or  less  damage  to 
other  varieties.  As  is  always  the  case  when  there  is  general 
winterkilling,  there  was  great  variation  in  the  amount  of 
damage  done.  While  the  factors  involved  in  winterkilling 
are  very  complex,  certain  of  them  may  be  quite  clearly  seen. 

1.  The  Location  of  the  Trees.  — Those  located  on  low 
ground  without  free  outlet  for  cold  air,  and  w'ith  extensive 
hillsides  or  plateaus  above  offering  conditions  which  favor 
the  cooling  of  the  air,  show  more  damage  than  trees  located 
where  air  drainage  is  good. 

2.  The  Variety.  —  Bakhvin,  Gravenstein,  King  and  Rhode 
Island'  Greening  were  among  the  varieties  suffering  most. 
Oldenburg,  Wealthy,  Mcintosh,  Yellow  Transparent,  Northern 
Spy  and  Ben  Davis  are  some  of  the  varieties  rarely  injured. 

3.  The  Condition  of  the  Tree.  —  Lack  of  vigor  due  to  neglect, 
poor  soil  conditions  or  the  production  of  a  heavy  crop  in  the 
season  of  1917  rendered  the  tree  more  susceptible  to  injury. 
Often  in  young  orchards,  trees  of  excessive  vigor,  which  had 
grown  late  in  the  fall  and  failed  to  ripen  their  wood,  were, 
badly  damaged. 


46  a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 

4.  In  some  cases  young  trees  of  comparatively  hardy  varieties 
suffered  from  root  killing.  These  trees  started  to  leaf  out 
in  the  normal  manner,  but  soon  ceased  growth  and  died. 
Evidently  the  seedling  root  was  less  hardy  than  the  top  and 
thus  more  easily  injured.  This  sort  of  injury  was  most  common 
in  the  eastern  part  of  the  State,  where  there  was  little  or  no 
snow  on  the  ground. 

The  enumeration  of  these  conditions  favoring  injury  sug- 
gests the  remedies.  Greater  care  should  be  exercised  in  choos- 
ing sites  that  have  free  outlet  below  for  cold  air,  and  not 
too  great  expanse  of  hillsides  above  from  which  cold  air  can 
flow  down  upon  the  orchard.  We  cannot  afford  to  discard 
the  Baldwin  nor  perhaps  the  other  rather  tender  varieties, 
but  we  can  take  all  possible  precautions  to  avoid  injury. 
Good  orchard  care,  to  secure  vigorous  but  not  excessive 
growth  and  thorough  ripening  in  the  fall,  is  desirable  from 
all  points  of  view.  Root  injury  is  not  extensive  in  Massa- 
chusetts, but  in  those  parts  of  the  State  where  the  snow 
covering  is  likely  to  be  light  it  may  be  worth  while  with 
hardy  varieties  to  plant  one-year  trees,  and  put  them  deep 
enough  so  they  may  root  from  the  scion. 

Work  at  the  Market-garden  Field  Station. 

Mr,  H.  F.  Tompson  makes  the  following  report  of  the  work 
at  the  market-garden  field  station  in  North  Lexington:  — 

During  the  first  full  year  of  the  market-garden  field  station 
the  following  projects  have  been  started :  — 

1.  Limited  variety  test  to  show  the  comparative  qualities 
of  leading  standard  varieties  of  the  common  garden  vegetables, 
to  compare  with  them  certain  new  or  improved  sources  pre- 
sented to  the  trade. 

2.  The  establishment  of  a  one-fourth  acre  plot  of  Martha 
Washington  asparagus. 

3.  The  beginning  of  a  ten-year  experiment  to  determine 
the  value  of  green  manure  as  compared  with  stable  manure 
and  a  standard  commercial  fertilizer  on  a  variety  of  vegetable 
crops  grown  in  regular  rotation. 

4.  Test  of  the  efficiency  of  the  tar  felt  discs  in  the  control 
of  the  cabbage  root  maggot  on  the  early  crop. 


1919.]  PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  47  a 

5.  Test  of  spray  mixture  in  the  control  of  early  blight  on 
Golden  Self-Blanching  Celery,  carried  on  in  co-operation  with 
the  department  of  plant  pathology  and  reported  by  them. 

6.  Special  test  of  twelve  leading  varieties  of  celery,  carried 
on  in  co-operation  with  experiment  stations  in  New  Hampshire, 
Connecticut  and  Rhode  Island,  to  determine  the  best  varieties 
for  market  in  the  respective  States. 

7.  Test  of  bush  beans  to  compare  the  freedom  from  disease 
of  seed  grown  in  the  irrigated  section  of  the  West  and  in 
Louisiana. 

8.  Production  of  seed  from  parsnips,  onions,  carrots,  beets 
and  spinach. 

9.  Test  of  Nature's  Plant  Food  on  beans  and  spinach. 
Several  other  minor  experiments  have  been  under  way,  as, 

for  instance,  the  growing  of  celery  4,  5  and  6  inches  apart  in 
the  row  to  learn  the  most  profitable  distance  for  setting;  the 
test  of  varieties  of  lettuce  for  frost  resistance;  the  planting 
of  spinach  of  several  varieties  to  winter  over,  to  test  hardiness. 


48  a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 


DEPARTMENT  OF  MICROBIOLOGY. 


CHARLES   E.    MARSHALL. 


Investigations  in  the  department  of  microbiology  during 
the  past  year  have  been  confined  to  two  lines  of  work,  —  the 
canning  of  food  and  a  study  of  milk  clarification.  On  account 
of  the  w^ar  situation  the  soil  investigations  were  suspended 
until  normal  conditions  are  resumed. 

While  we  have  secured  many  satisfactory  results  from  our 
canning  investigations,  nevertheless  the  work  has  been  left 
incomplete  because  of  the  changes  in  our  staff  due  largely 
to  the  demands  of  war  service  elsewhere.  It  is  our  hope  that 
we  may  resume  this  work  with  canning  as  opportunity  and 
facilities  offer. 

One  portion  of  the  clarification  investigation  has  been  com- 
pleted and  is  now  issuing  in  bulletin  form.  The  other  portion 
is  still  under  way. 

The  publications  of  the  department  for  the  past  year  may  be 
listed  as  follows:  — 

"Soy  Beans  as  Human  Food."    A.  llano.    Mass.  Exp.  Sta.  Bulletin  No. 

182.    March,  1918. 
"A  Method  for  the  Counting  of  Certain  Protozoa  in  the  Soil."    A.  Itano 

and  G.  B.  Ray.    Soil  Sci.,  1918,  Vol.  V.,  pp.  303-310. 
"Clarification  of  Milk."    C.  E.  Marshall  and  E.  G.  Hood.    Mass.  Exp. 

Sta.  Bulletin  No.  187,  November,  1918. 

The  analytical  work  of  the  laboratory  has  been  heavy  during 
the  past  year,  and  may  be  cited  as  follows:  — 

Milk  samples, 1,095 

Physicians'  specimens,     ........        136 

Water  specimens,    .........  6 


1919.1 


PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31. 


49  a 


Also,  in  accordance  with  our  practice,  we  have  distributed 
legume  cultures  where  requested.     The  number  follows:  — 


For  alfalfa, 
For  soy  beans, 
For  beans, 
For  peas,  . 
For  cow  peas. 
For  white  clover. 
For  red  clover,  . 
For  sweet  clover, 
For  alsike  clover. 
For  crimson  clover, 
For  vetch, 


98 

96 

110 

60 

3 

4 

20 

12 

12 

2 

3 


Total, 


420 


50a  EXPERBIEXT  STATION.  [Jan. 


DEPARTMENT  OF  POULTRY  HUSBANDRY. 


H.   D.    GOODALE. 


Improvement  in  egg  production  continues  steadily.  Pullets 
laying  200  or  more  eggs  have  become  very  common.  More- 
over, many  birds  continue  to  lay  for  several  weeks  after  the 
completion  of  the  three  hundred  and  sixty-five  day  period. 
The  average  production  of  the  high  lines  (269  birds)  is  nearly 
three  dozen  eggs  more  than  the  average  flock  production  in 
1915-16. 

Eliminating  Broodiness.  —  Starting  with  foundation  stock 
that  was  extremely  broody,  a  strain  of  Rhode  Island  Reds 
has  been  established  that  is  almost  as  free  from  broodiness 
as  White  Leghorns.  In  the  original  flock,  87  per  cent  became 
broody,  with  an  average  of  4.9  broody  periods  for  each  broody 
hen.  In  the  non-broody  line  of  Reds,  19.8  per  cent  became 
broody,  with  an  average  of  1.9  times  broody.  Corresponding 
figures  for  the  Leghorns  at  the  Storrs  Contest,  fifth  report, 
are  13.6  per  cent  broody,  with  an  average  of  1.3  broody 
periods  per  bird. 

Fortune  has  favored  us,  and  the  quick  establishment  of  a 
non-broody  line  of  high  producers  seems  assured  through  the 
appearance  of  non-broody  males  in  the  high  lines. 

One  of  the  most  important  results  of  this  year's  work  is 
the  proof  that  high  winter  production  descends  directly  from 
mother  to  daughter;  at  least,  this  is  true  for  the  Rhode 
Island  Reds,  since  the  offspring  of  high-producing  Rhode 
Island  Red  females  by  a  Cornish  male  (poor  winter  layers) 
were  high  producers. 

The  isolation  method  of  rearing  chicks  continues  to  give 
the  same  fine  results,  as  always.  Roup  and  colds  can  be 
prevented  as  long  as  an  unbroken  quarantine  is  maintained. 


1919.]  PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  51a 

A  technical  study  of  the  mode  of  inheritance  of  winter  egg 
production  has  been  completed,  and  the  results  are  in  course 
of  publication.     This  study  deals  with  the  following  points:  — 

1.  The  applicability  of  Pearl's  explanation  to  our  data.  This  is  demon- 
strated. 

2.  The  develo]3ment  of  another  explanation. 

3.  The  applicability  of  this  explanation  to  the  data.  This  is  demon- 
strated, and  the  points  of  its  superiority  over  Pearl's  explanation  pointed 
out. 

4.  Proof  that  both  explanations  have  weaknesses,  which  makes  neces- 
sary a  state  of  suspended  judgment  in  regard  to  their  validity. 

5.  Methods  of  proof  for  future  use  are  presented. 

Another  study,  also  in  press,  has  demonstrated  that  the 
so-called  interstitial  cells  of  the  hen's  ovary  are  probably 
eosinophilic  leucocytes. 


52  a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 


DEPARTMENT    OF    VETERINARY    SCIENCE. 


JAMES   B.    PAIGE. 


The  policies  adopted  several  years  ago  for  the  conduct  of 
the  work  in  the  veterinary  department  have  been  adhered 
to  during  the  past  year  in  so  far  as  the  unusual  conditions 
of  war  have  permitted.  Two  lines  of  work  of  an  experimental 
character  have  been  considerably  disturbed  by  war  conditions. 
These  are  referred  to  in  detail  below. 

As  usual  there  has  been  received  in  the  department  a  large 
number  of  letters  from  stock  owners  throughout  the  State 
asking  for  information  regarding  the  cause  and  nature  of 
diseases  that  have  appeared  among  their  domestic  animals, 
together  with  requests  for  suggestions  as  to  the  treatment  and 
suppression  of  the  same.  In  every  instance  these  communica- 
tions have  been  answered  by  letter,  and,  in  many  instances, 
bulletins  from  one  source  or  another  have  been  sent,  giving 
more  detailed  information  than  could  be  furnished  by  letter. 

In  addition  to  the  correspondence  referred  to  above  there 
has  come  to  the  department  about  the  usual  number  of  speci- 
mens from  sick  or  dead  animals,  with  a  request  that  an  exami- 
nation be  made  of  the  material  for  purposes  of  diagnosis  and 
the  suggestion  of  a  line  of  treatment  for  the  cure  of  the  disease 
or  the  prevention  of  its  spread  to  other  animals  on  the  farm. 
In  most  instances  the  examination  of  this  material  has  enabled 
us  to  give  to  the  stock  owner  information  that  has  been  of 
distinct  benefit  to  him  in  dealing  with  the  particular  disease 
in  question.  It  will  be  understood,  of  course,  that  in  some 
instances,  on  account  of  the  selection  of  the  specimen  for 
examination  by  the  layman  not  familiar  with  pathological 
conditions,  the  preservation  and  packing  of  the  same  for 
transportation,    delays   in    transportation    and    consequent   de- 


1919.J  PUBLIC  DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  53 « 

composition,  some  of  the  material  received  has  been  in  such 
condition  that  an  examination  could  give  no  satisfactory  data 
for  a  report  or  advice  to  the  stock  owner.  In  every  instance, 
however,  after  the  specimen  has  been  received  and  examined, 
a  detailed  report  in  the  form  of  a  personal  communication 
has  been  forwarded  to  the  party  from  whom  the  specimen 
has  come. 

The  examination  of  specimens  from  the  stock  owners  has 
been  of  value  not  alone  to  those  from  whom  the  materials 
have  come,  but  also  to  the  students  taking  courses  in  the 
department,  for  they  are  thus  enabled  to  study  specimens  of 
diseased  tissue  which  it  might  be  difficult  to  obtain  in  such 
abundance  and  variety  by  any  other  means. 

For  several  years  prior  to  February,  1918,  the  department 
staff  has  been  engaged  in  three  different  lines  of  work,  two 
of  which  were  strictly  experimental  in  their  nature,  and  the 
third,  a  control  measure  for  the  suppression  and  elimination 
of  a  disease  of  poultry.  With  the  development  of  war  con- 
ditions in  1917  and  1918  it  became  necessary  to  suspend  the 
control  work  and  one  line  of  experimental  study.  The  emer- 
gency conditions  due  to  the  war  have  also  seriously  interfered 
with  the  prosecution  of  the  second  line  of  investigational  work. 

Blood  Test  of  Fow^ls. 
From  February,  1915,  to  February,  1918,  there  has  been 
carried  on  by  the  department  a  line  of  control  work  for  the 
suppression  and  elimination  of  bacillary  white  diarrhea  in 
fowls.  Blood  samples  have  been  collected  from  flocks  of 
fowls  in  nearly  one  hundred  towns  of  the  State.  These  have 
been  brought  to  the  veterinary  laboratory  and  used  for  making 
the  agglutination  test  for  the  diagnosis  of  bacillary  white 
diarrhea.  Upon  the  completion  of  the  test  a  report  has  been 
sent  to  the  owner  of  the  birds  from  which  the  blood  samples 
were  taken,  and  detailed  information  given  for  the  subsequent 
treatment  of  the  flock  in  order  to  eliminate  the  diseased  birds 
and  to  protect  the  healthy  individuals  from  infection.  During 
the  three  years  that  the  work  has  been  in  progress  there  have 
been  about  35,000  birds  tested,  with  the  most  satisfactory 
results  from  the  disease  suppression  point  of  view. 


54  a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan. 

For  a  period  of  about  a  year  and  a  half  prior  to  July,  1917, 
Dr.  J.  B.  Lentz  was  in  charge  of  the  blood-test  work.  On 
the  above  date  he  was  granted  an  indefinite  leave  of  absence 
to  enable  him  to  enlist  in  the  national  service.  After  a  time 
spent  in  several  different  military  camps  in  this  country  he 
was  sent  overseas  for  service  in  veterinary  lines  of  work, 
with  the  rank  of  captain.  At  the  present  writing  he  is  still 
in  service  overseas. 

In  order  to  continue  the  testing,  Dr.  C.  T.  Buchholz  was 
secured  to  begin  work  on  July  1,  1917.  He  carried  on  the 
work  very  suc^cessfully  for  a  period  of  about  two  and  one-half 
months,  when  he  resigned  to  accept  a  position  as  a  veterinary 
practitioner  in  his  home  State  of  Pennsylvania. 

After  a  brief  suspension  of  the  work  following  the  retirement 
of  Dr.  Buchholz,  it  was  resumed  in  October,  1917,  by  Dr.  G. 
E.  Gage,  associate  professor  of  animal  pathology.  It  was 
carried  along  by  him  until  Feb.  1,  1918,  when  he  was  given  an 
indefinite  leave  of  absence  to  enable  him  to  enter  the  military 
service  of  the  country.  As  a  member  of  the  Yale  Medical 
Unit  he  has  been  overseas  for  several  months  in  charge  of 
certain  lines  of  pathological  and  serological  work  connected 
with  the  service.  n 

With  the  retirement  of  Dr.  Gage  it  again  became  necessary 
to  suspend  the  testing  of  birds.  It  was  hoped  that  the  sus- 
pension would  be  only  temporary,  contingent  upon  securing 
the  services  of  a  suitably  trained  pathologist  and  bacteriologist 
to  enable  us  to  again  resume  it.  After  prolonged  search  it 
was  found  impossible  to  find  a  pathologist  and  bacteriologist 
outside  the  service  who  was  willing  to  vacate  the  position  he 
then  held  to  accept  a  temporary  appointment  in  the  veterinary 
department  to  engage  in  this  control  work.  On  this  account 
we  have  not  been  able  to  do  the  testing  that  we  had  hoped  to 
do  prior  to  the  coming  of  the  present  hatching  season. 

When  the  work  was  suspended  in  February  of  1918,  a  circu- 
lar letter  was  addressed  to  every  poultryman  and  applicant 
for  the  test  who  had  had  birds  tested,  advising  that  there 
would  probably  be  a  suspension  of  the  work,  and  suggesting 
the  advisability  of  his  keeping  his  tested  stock  for  the  hatching 
reason  of  1919.     Where  this  has  been  done   the  poultrymen 


1919.]  rUBLIC   DOCUMENT  — No.  31.  55a 

who  had  stock  tested  in  1917  or  1918  are  experiencing  but 
little  trouble  in  securing  sufficient  eggs  from  healthy  birds  to 
meet  their  requirements  for  hatching  the  present  season. 

With  the  return  of  either  Dr.  Gage  or  Dr.  Lentz  to  the 
department,  it  is  expected  that  the  fowl  testing  will  be  resumed. 

Bacterium  Pullorum  Studies. 
In    an    earlier   report   the   following    studies   relative   to    B. 
puUorum  by  Dr.  Gage  were  outlined:  — 

1.  Bacterium  pullorum  infection. 

2.  A  comparison  of  the  antibodies  of  B.  pullorum  with  those  of  the 
B.  coli-B.  iyphi-B.  dysentera'  group  of  agglutinins. 

3.  The  toxicity  of  B.  pulloruvi  products. 

These  several  studies  were  incomplete  in  February,  1918, 
when  Dr.  Gage  left  the  department  for  service  in  the  army. 
The  data  have  been  preserved,  and  the  work  will  be  completed 
and  details  published  upon  his  return.  It  is  to  be  hoped  that 
the  completed  projects  may  throw  some  light  upon  the  manner 
in  which  bacillary  white  diarrhea  is  spread  among  chicks  and 
adult  birds,  and  possibly  give  us  a  simpler  and  shorter  method 
for  making  the  blood  test  without  a  sacrifice  of  the  accuracy 
which  is  characteristic  of  the  present  complicated  method. 

Hog  Cholera  Investigations. 

The  studies  now  being  made  by  the  writer  relative  to  the 
prevention  of  hog  cholera  by  the  use  of  anti-hog  cholera 
serum,  and  the  endurance  of  the  acquired  immunity  to  the 
disease  possessed  by  pigs  born  of  mothers  that  are  either 
naturally  immune  or  have  been  made  so  b}^  the  simultaneous 
treatment  with  serum  and  virus,  have  been  continued  through- 
out the  year,  use  having  been  made  of  a  herd  of  from  75  to 
150  pigs  that  are  fed  largely  upon  raw  garbage  for  purposes 
of  experimentation. 

In  carrying  on  these  investigations  several  difficulties  have 
been  encountered  that  have  interfered  with  the  work  to  a 
greater  or  less  extent.  The  most  important  of  these  has  been 
the  securing  of  a  suitable  supply  of  serum  and  virus  for  the 


56  a  EXPERIMENT  STATION.  [Jan.  1919. 

treatment  of  the  young  pigs.  The  firm  from  which  the  supply 
was  obtained  up  to  the  present  year  has  devoted  so  much 
time  and  attention  to  the  preparation  of  the  various  biological 
products  used  in  the  army  for  the  treatment  of  the  soldiers 
that  it  became  necessary  for  them  to  discontinue  the  manu- 
facture and  distribution  of  some  of  their  biological  products 
for  the  treatment  and  prevention  of  disease  of  domestic  ani- 
mals. This  has  been  a  serious  handicap  in  the  hog  cholera 
studies  that  are  being  carried  on  in  the  department,  because 
of  the  fact  that  it  has  no  longer  been  possible  to  obtain  the 
same  series  of  preparations  that  have  been  used  in  the  earlier 
investigation,  and  which  it  was  hoped  could  be  continued  to 
the  completion  of  the  experiment. 


BULLETIN   No.    182. 


DEPARTMENT  OP  MICROBIOLOGY. 


SOY  BEANS  {GLYCINE HISPIDA)  AS  HUMAN  FOOD. 


BY  ARAO   ITANO. 


INTRODUCTION. 


For  centuries  the  importance  of  soy  beans  as  human  food  has  been 
well  known  in  oriental  countries.  Kellner/  Atwater  2  and  others^  bear 
testimony  to  this  importance  by  their  studies  of  the  chemical  composi- 
tion, digestion  and  assimilation.  Soy  beans  have  furnished  the  chief 
source  of  protein  to  the  people  of  Japan  and  China;  they  are  in  universal 
use,  and  have  played  the  role  of  meat  and  milk  for  these  nations.  A  lack 
of  animals,  the  economic  conditions  and  religious  rites  have  all  had  their 
influence  in  making  soy  beans  the  leading  protein  food  crop  in  this,  one 
of  the  most  densely  populated  sections  of  the  globe.  Although  a  great 
favorite  and  very  important,  the  position  of  the  white  bean  of  the  United 
States  is  scarcely  comparable  with  the  conspicuous  place  occupied  by  the 
soy  bean  in  these  eastern  countries.  It  is  the  richest,  cheapest  and  most 
productive  of  all  legumes,  and  is  prepared  by  nearly  as  many  methods  for 
human  consumption  as  cow's  milk. 

At  this  particular  time,  when  this  country  as  well  as  others  is  searching 
out  economical  food  and  food  production,  it  may  be  well  to  inquire  into 
this  article  of  food  and  its  methods  of  preparation  for  humans,  for  it  is 
doubtless  one  of  the  most  promising  in  sight. 

This  being  a  popular  presentation,  the  technical  and  theoretical  dis- 
cussions of  the  subject  will  be  held  for  future  treatment.  Not  only  from 
the  standpoint  of  food  supply,  but  also  from  the  standpoint  of  nitrogen 
supply  to  the  soil  and  industrial  uses,  the  soy  bean  occupies  a  very  im- 
portant place. 

1  O.  Kellner:  U.  S.  Dept.  Com.,  Bur.  For.  and  Dom.  Com.,  Special  Agents  Series,  No.  84, 
Pt.  I.,  35. 

2  W.  O.  Atwater:  Farmers'  Bull.  No.  142,  1902,  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agr. 

3  The  Japanese  investigations.  Bulletins  from  College  of  Agriculture,  Tokyo  and  Sapporo, 
Japan. 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    182. 


CHEMICAL  COMPOSITION  AND  DIGESTIBILITY. 

Table  I.  —  Chemical  Composition  of  Dry,  Ri-pened  Soy  Beans. ^ 


Soy  Beans  from  — 


China. 


Hungary. 


France. 


United 
States  of 
America 
(Goess- 
mann). 


Japan. 


Crude  protein,     . 

Fat,      . 

Crude  fiber. 

Starch, 

Ash,      . 

Other  organic  matter, 


38.69 
17.87 
12.69 
3.49 
5.39 
21.01 


31.21 
18.29 
12.78 
3.51 
5.63 
28.09 


34.92 
15.53 
12.81 
3.53 
5.97 
26.53 


33.36 
21.89 


5.35 
34.18 


42.05 
20.46 
4.53 

4.19 

28.82 


Table  I.  plainly  indicates  the  very  high  percentage  of  protein,  31.21  to 
42.05  per  cent.,  and  of  fat,  15.53  to  21.89  per  cent.,  which  compares  with 
beef  (round  steak),  containing  an  average  of  19  per  cent,  proteins  and 
12.8  per  cent.  fats. 

While  it  is  a  well-estabUshed  fact  that  these  substances,  namely,  pro- 
teins and  fats,  are  essential  materials  in  animal  nutrition,  the  results  of 
recent  investigations  indicate  that  individual  proteins  differ  in  their 
digestibility  and  nutritive  value,  and  that  this  difference  is  due  to  the 
particular  amino  acids  which  they  jield  upon  hydrolysis.  The  interpre- 
tation, however,  of  such  experimental  results  as  have  been  thus  far  secured 
"is  somewhat  confused.  In  case  of  the  soy  beans,  the  digestibility  of  the 
crude  protein  and  fat  is  estimated  at  somewhere  between  65  and  92  per 
cent.,  and  70  and  80  per  cent.,  respectively,  by  the  different  investigators, 
such  as  Oshima,^  Kellner  ^  and  others.  Although  these  figures  may  not 
necessarily  be  indicative  of  actual  food  value,  the  relative  merit  of  the 
soy  bean  as  human  food  is  very  significant. 

The  author  feels  that  there  is  still  much  to  determine  in  the  case  of 
vegetable  and  animal  proteins,  and  that  we  have  not  3'et  reached  the 
stage  in  our  knowledge  where  definite  recommendations  can  be  made. 
Prauswitz'^  conception,  one  of  many,  may  have  some  bearing  in  the  case 
of  this  particular  food,  for  the  preparation  of  soy  beans  does  seem  to  have 
a  distinctive  effect  upon  their  digestive  and  assimilative  values.  It  is 
possible  that  the  fundamental  differences  in  the  nature  of  the  nutrients, 
or  proteins,  may  be  disregarded.  The  long-continued,  successful  use  of 
soy  beans  in  oriental  countries,  over  two  thousand  years,  cannot  be  con- 
sidered Hghtly  in  scientific  interpretation. 

>  M.  Inouye:   Bull.  2,  209,  1894-97,  College  of  Agriculture,  Tokyo,  Japan. 

2  K.  Oshima:   Bull.  159,  p.  191,  1905,  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agr.,  Office  of  Exp.  Sta. 

3  O.  Kellner:  U.  S.  Dept.  Com.,  Bur.  For.  and  Dom.  Com.,  Special  Agents  Series,  No.  84, 
Pt.  I.,  p.  35. 

«  Prauswitz:  Ztschr.  Biol.,  35  (1897),  p.  335. 


SOY    BEANS    AS    HUMAN    FOOD.  6 

HUMAN  FOOD  PREPARED  FROM  SOY  BEANS. 

The  various*food  articles  prepared  from  soy  beans  which  are  known  to 
the  author  are  named  below  (names  in  parentheses  indicate  the  Japanese 
name) :  — 

1.  Soy  bean  milk  (toniu). 

Ordinary  method  employed  in  Japan. 

Toniu  from  the  soy  bean  meal. 

Author's  method. 

Synthetic  toniu. 

Condensed. 

Evaporated  (yuba). 

2.  Soy  bean  curd  (tofu). 

Fresh  tofu. 

Frozen  tofu  (kori  tofu). 

Fried  tofu  (abura-age). 

3.  Baked  beans. 

4.  Boiled  beans. 

5.  Roasted  beans. 

6.  Powdered  beans. 

Roasted. 
Raw. 

7.  Green  beans. 

8.  Soy  bean  pulp  (kara). 

9.  Fermented  boiled  beans  (natto). 

10.  Ripened  vegetable  cheese  (miso). 

11.  Soy  bean  sauce  (shojna). 

12.  Vegetable  butter  and  ice  cream. 

13.  Oil  (table  use). 

14.  Lard  (cooking). 

Soy  Bean  Milk  (Toniu). 

The  author  suggests  a  Japanese  term,  toniu,  meaning  milk  from  beans, 
to  designate  the  hquid  preparation  from  soy  beans,  the  so-called  "milk" 
from  soy  beans,  to  avoid  confusion  of  terms.  The  toniu  may  be  prepared 
by  any  one  of  the  following  processes,  varying  somewhat  in  quality  and, 
accordingly,  adaptation  to  use. 

The  Ordinary  Method  employed  in  Japan. 

1.  Soak  the  beans  in  water  for  twelve  hours  at  room  temperature, 
changing  the  water  frequently. 

2.  Grind  the  beans  to  a  fine  smooth  paste  by  means  of  a  grinder,  prefer- 
ably a  millstone,  adding  water  to  the  ground  mass  from  time  to  time, 
to  the  amount  of  three  times  the  bulk  of  beans. 

3.  Boil  the  mass  to  foaming  for  one  hour. 

4.  Strain  through  fine  cheesecloth.  The  strained  fluid  should  be  white 
and  opaque. 

Note.  —  The  toniu  thus  prepared  resembles  cow's  milk.  This  is  indi- 
cated in  Table  II.     Upon  standing,  fat  globules  separate  out  on  the 


4  MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    182. 

surface.  After  standing  several  days  souring  takes  place  as  in  cow's 
milk.  It  can  be  used  very  satisfactorilj^  for  various  family  foods,  as  in 
the  preparing  of  bread,  cake,  vegetable  stews,  soups,  chocolate,  candies, 
etc.  It  has  a  sHght  vegetable  flavor  which  may  be  objectionable  to  some 
people  for  drinking  purposes,  although  it  is  used  to  a  considerable  extent 
in  oriental  countries. 


Table  II.  —  Composition  of  Soy  Bean  Milk  compared  with  Coiv's  Milk 

(Per  Cent.)} 


Water, 

Albuminoids,       ....... 

Fat 

Fiber, 

Ash 

Non-nitrogenous  extract  including  carbohydrates. 
Milk  sugar, 


Cow's  Milk. 

86.08 
4.00 
3.05 

.70 

5.00 


Table  II.  indicates '  the  similarity  in  composition  between  toniu  and 
cow's  milk. 

Toniu  from  the  Soy  Bean  Meal} 

1.  Add  water  to  the  amount  of  five  times  the  bulk  of  the  bean  meal. 

2.  Let  it  stand  for  twelve  hours  at  room  temperature., 

3.  Boil  it  to  foaming  for  one  hour. 

4.  Strain  through  fine  cheesecloth.  The  strained  fluid  should  be  white 
and  opaque. 

Author's  Method. 

1.  Add  water  to  the  amount  of  five  times  the  bulk  of  the  bean  meal. 

2.  Inoculate  the  content  with  B.  coli  and  with  B.  lactis  osrogenes  as 
used  in  salt  rising  bread. 

3.  Let  it  stand  for  sixteen  hours  at  room  temperature. 

4.  Boil  to  foaming  for  one  hour. 

5.  Filter  through  fine  cheesecloth. 

6.  Add  table  salt  to  the  amount  of  one-half  teaspoonful  per  quart. 
The  addition  of  5  per  cent,  milk  sugar  (lactose)  improves  the  taste,  and 
may  be  desirable  unless  the  milk  is  intended  for  diabetic  patients. 

1  M.  Inouye:  Bull.  2,  212,  1894-97,  College  of  Agriculture,  Tokyo,  Japan. 

2  The  soy  bean  meal  may  be  obtained  by  grinding  the  beans  in  a  wheat  flour  mill;  a  fine  cofifee 
mill  works  satisfactorily  also.  This  preparation  may  be  used  in  the  same  manner  as  the  previous 
product. 


SOY   BEANS   AS   HUMAN   FOOD.  5 

Note.  —  The  advantage  of  tliis  method  over  the  others  may  be  sum- 
marized as  follows :  — 

1.  Elimination  of  disagreeable  flavor. 

2.  Adjustment  of  taste. 

3.  Reducing  the  probability  of  flatulence  in  the  alimentary  canal. 

4.  Adaptability  as  a  liquid  food  for  diabetic  patients. 

The  results  of  further  investigation  of  the  method  and  also  of  its  nutri- 
tive value  are  withheld  for  the  present. 

Synthetic  Toniu. 
Toniu  of  very  high  quality,  which  resembles  cow's  milk  very  closely  in 
composition,  can  be  produced  through  both  chemical  and  biological 
means;  in  fact,  the  author  has  been  informed  that  this  end  has  been 
accomplished  in  one  of  the  London  chemical  laboratories.  The  author, 
however,  doubts  its  practicabiUty  for  domestic  use. 

Condensed  Soy  Bean  Milk  {Condensed  Toniu). ^ 

1.  Add  4  grams  of  dipotassium  phosphate  and  600  grams  of  cane  sugar 
to  4  liters  of  soy  bean  milk. 

2.  Concentrate  the  solution  in  vacuo  to  a  very  thick  liquid. 

Note.  —  It  can  be  used  like  condensed  cow's  milk  for  the  preparation 
of  chocolate,  etc.  It  gives  an  agreeable  taste,  but  has  a  very  feeble  odor 
of  raw  beans. 

Evaporated  Soy  Bean  Milk  (Yuba). 

1.  Boil  the  soy  bean  milk  until  a  film  is  formed  on  the  surface. 

2.  Collect  the  film  and  cut  it  in  any  shape  desired. 

Note.  —  The  film  consists  of  coagulated  albuminoids  and  fat.  It  may 
be  used  as  an  article  of  food,  cooked  in  soup,  etc. 


Table  III. 


Soy  Bean  Curd  (Tofu). 
Chemical  Composition  of  Some  Preparations  {Per  Cent.) 


Water. 

Protein. 

Fat. 

Carbo- 
hydrate,?. 

Ash. 

Fresh  tofu, 

Frozen  tofu,          

Fried  tofu, 

Tofu  cake  (kara),         .... 
Yuba, 

88.11 
18.72 
57.40 
84.49 
18.31 

6.29 
48.65 
21.96 

5.28 
49.65 

3.38 
28.65 
18.72 

1.58 
18.00 

1.64 

2.33 

.57 

8.04 

11.82 

.58 
1.65 
1.35 

.66 
2.22 

Table  III.  indicates  the  chemical  composition  of  various  preparations 
from  soy  bean  milk.     The  digestibihty  of  the  nutrients  in  tofu  has  been 

1  T.  Katayama:  Bull.  7,  113,  1906-08,  College  of  Agriculture,  Tokyo.  Japan. 

2  K.  Oshima:  Bull.  159,  28,  1905,  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agr.,  Office  of  Exp.  Sta 


6  MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    182. 

found  to  be  as  high  as  95  per  cent,  for  protein,  95  per  cent,  for  fat,  and 
99  per  cent,  for  carbohj^drates.^  Thus  the  composition  and  the  digesti- 
bihty  of  tofu  estabhsh  it  as  a  very  nutritive  food  substance. 

The  methods  of  preparation  of  these  articles  will  be  given  in  the  follow- 
ing pages. 

Fresh  Curd  (Tofu). 

1.  Prepare  the  soy  bean  milk  either  from  whole  beans  or  from  bean 
meal  as  described  pre\'iously. 

2.  Add  2  per  cent,  of  any  one  of  the  following  substances  while  it  is 
hot,  stirring  constantly :  — 

(a)  Mother  liquid  of  sea  salt.^ 

(b)  Magnesium  and  calcium  chloride  solution.^ 

(c)  Saturated  solution  of  alum.^ 

(d)  Vinegar.^ 

3.  Filter  off  the  liquid. 

4.  Press  the  precipitate  in  a  wooden  frame. 

5.  Let  the  pressed  curd  float  in  a  large  quantity  of  fresh  cold  water 
in  order  to  free  the  coagulum  from  chemicals  added. 

Note.  —  In  Japan  tofu  is  prepared  and  sold  in  the  market  as  baked 
goods  are  in  this  country.  Its  preparation  may  be  too  involved  for  the 
domestic  kitchen.  Among  the  coagulants  the  mother  liquid  of  sea  salt 
and  the  magnesium  mixture  are  preferred  to  the  others  because  the 
excess  of  these  substances  is  almost  completely  removed  by  immersing  in 
cold  water. 

Frozen  Tofu  {Kori  Tofu). 

1.  Cut  the  fresh  tofu  into  small  pieces. 

2.  Subject  the  pieces  to  freezing. 

3.  Dry  in  vacuo  after  freezing. 

Note.  —  The  product  thus  prepared  can  be  preserved  for  years  and 
transported  very  easily.  Freezing  hastens  the  removal  of  water.  The 
final  product  is  porous  and  can  be  eaten  in  soups. 

Fried  Tofu  (Abura-age). 

1.  Cut  the  frozen  tofu  into  the  desired  size. 

2.  Fry  it  in  rape-seed  oil,  sesame-seed  oil,  or  in  a  large  quantity  of  lard 
until  the  surface  becomes  brown. 

Note.  —  It  makes  a  very  palatable,  rich  food,  and  may  be  eaten  like 
fried  egg  or  meat,  or  in  soup. 

'  When  eaten  with  rice. 
-  This  is  commonly  used. 

3  Mix  the  saturated  solution  of  magnesium  and  calcium  chloride  in  proportion  of  4  : 1.  (The 
author's  recommendation.) 

*  Recommendation  of  the  author. 

*  Recommendation  of  the  author;  ordinary  table  vinegar. 


SOY   BEANS   AS   HUMAN   FOOD. 


Baked  Beans. 

1.  Soak  the  beans,  suspended  in  a  cloth  bag,  in  a  large  quantity  of  hot 
water  over  night.  (Soaking  for  twenty-four  hours  in  cold  water  which 
is  changed  occasionally  will  give  the  same  result.) 

2.  Change  the  water,  when  hot  water  is  applied,  in  the  morning  and  an 
hour  or  two  before  cooking. 

3.  Add  1  teaspoonful  of  soda  per  quart  of  beans  and  boil  until  the  beans 
become  soft. 

4.  Bake  like  other  beans. 

Note.  —  The  characteristic  strong  flavor  of  the  beans  is  removed  by 
soaking  before  cooking;  the  addition  of  soda  makes  the  beans  soft.  Cook- 
ing with  salt  pork,  potatoes,  onions,  molasses  and  other  substances  makes 
the  beans  more  palatable  to  some  tastes. 

Boiled  Beans. 

Treat  the  beans  as  in  the  case  of  the  baked  beans,  and  boil  them  in 
a  double  boiler  four  to  five  hours  until  they  become  soft. 

Note.  —  The  addition  of  any  one  of  the  articles  recommended  for  use 
with  the  baked  beans  may  make  the  beans  more  agreeable  to  some  people. 

Roasted  Beans. 

1.  Roasting  can  be  done  either  in  an  oven  or  in  an  ordinary  corn  popper. 

2.  Roast  until  the  skin  of  the  bean  is  burst  by  popping. 

Note.  —  The  beans  can  be  kept  soft  by  immersing  them  in  a  syrup 
while  thej^  are  hot.     Thus  very  wholesome  candy  is  prepared. 

Powdered  Beans. 

Roasted. 

1.  Roast  as  in  the  roasted  beans. 

2.  Let  them  stand  until  cool  to  harden  them. 

3.  Grind  them  in  a  coffee  mill  or  any  other  suitable  grinder. 

Note.  —  The  powder  can  be  used  as  salad  dressing  or  cooked  with 
cookies  like  peanuts  and  other  nuts,  or  employed  as  a  substitute  for  coffee. 

Raw  (Soy  Bean  Meal). 

Grind  the  raw  beans  to  a  fine  powder. 

Note.  —  One  part  of  bean  meal  mixed  with  4  parts  of  wheat  flour  in 
bread  makes  a  quite  palatable  bread,  which  is  very  nutritious;  it  is  also 
used  for  biscuit,  muffins,  etc.  Bread  made  of  soy  bean  meal  alone  is 
recommended  for  diabetic  patients,  as  it  contains  only  very  small  amounts 
of  starch,  sugar  and  dextrin.  ^ 

1  A.  L.  Winton:  Conn.  State  Exp.  Sta.  Rept.,  30,  153-165,  1906. 


8  MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    182. 


Green  Beans. 

1.  Pick  them  when  the  beans  are  three-fourths  to  full  grown. 

2.  Boil  them  in  salt  water. 

3.  Discard  the  pods. 

4.  Serve  the  beans  with  butter  or  milk. 

Note.  —  The  pods  are  tough  and  they  can  be  removed  easily  on 
boiling. 

Soy  Bean  Pulp  (Kara). 

1 .  This  is  the  residue  after  the  milk  is  extracted  in  the  process  of  prep- 
aration of  so.y  bean  milk. 

2.  Cooked  like  any  other  vegetable  with  proper  seasoning. 

Note.  —  Makes  a  very  rich  dish;  an  addition  of  green  onions,  cabbage 
or  parsnip  may  improve  it. 

Fermented  Boiled  Beans  (Natto). 

1.  Boil  beans  for  five  hours. 

2.  Wrap  inside  of  a  straw  bundle. 

3.  Smoke  them  in  a  closed  cellar  by  building  a  wood  fire  and  closing 
the  door. 

4.  Let  them  ferment  in  a  warm,  moist  atmosphere  at  40°  C.  for  twenty- 
four  hours. 

Note.  —  In  making  the  bundle  rice  straw  is  preferred.  This  may  not 
be  suited  to  American  palates  on  account  of  its  peculiar  flavor,  which  is 
due  to  the  ripening  protein.  This  recipe  may  also  be  undesirable  on 
account  of  the  difficulties  involved  in  the  process. 

Table  IV.  — Chemical  Composition  of  Natto  {Per  Cent.).''- 

Nitrogen  proteids,  ..........    4.033 

Nitrogen  of  amides,        ..........    1.892 

Nitrogen  of  peptone,     ..........    1.617 

Total  nitrogen, 7.542 

The  relatively  high  percentage  of  total  nitrogen  may  be  due  to  the  loss 
of  carbon  as  carbon  dioxide  during  the  fermentation. 

Ripened  Vegetable  Cheese  ^  (Miso). 

1.  Preparation  of  "mother  miso,"  or  koji.^ 

2.  Steam  soy  beans  for  twenty-four  hours. 

3.  Rub  into  a  thick,  uniform  paste. 

1  K.  Yabe:  Bull.  Vol.  2,  72,  1894-97,  College  of  Agriculture,  Tokyo,  Japan. 

2  Koji  used  for  manufacturing  miso  is  similar  to  that  used  in  making  sak6,  —  Japanese  rice 
wine.  It  consists  of  barley  or  rice  with  a  culture  of  certain  forms  of  fungi,  chiefly  Aspergillus 
oryzse.    It  contains  diastatic,  inverting  and  proteolytic  ferments. 


SOY   BEANS   AS   HUMAN   FOOD. 


9 


4.  Add  proper  amount  *  of  koji,  salt  and  water. 

5.'  ]\Iix  well  and  store  in  a  vat  at  15°  to  20°  C. 

6.  Let  it  ferment  for  a  certain  period  of  time  according  to  the  variety 
of  miso. 

Note.  —  Preparation  of  miso  at  home  is  not  easily  done  because  of  the 
complexity  of  the  technic,  although  it  is  very  often  practiced  in  Japan. 
Koji  is  sold  in  Japan  on  the  market  from  special  factories.  It  can  be 
used  very  extensively  for  preparing  soups,  cooking  vegetables,  making 
sandwiches,  etc.  Different  kinds  of  miso  are  produced  through  the  use 
of  different  manipulations  and  components. 

Table  V.  —  Composition  of  Red  and  White  Miso  {Per  Cent.)? 


^ 

S! 

•^ 

^_j 

J- 

3 

s 

O 

J^ 

CB     . 

Q 

J. 

"S 

i 

>> 

Q 

id 

c 
'S 

2 

fa 

~  6 

s 

3 

5 

."p 
1^ 

o 

s 
e 

o 

U 

< 

Is 

0 

White  miso,  . 

59.27 

89.78 

22.13 

10.18 

5.10 

1.09 

6.31 

8.32 

.95 

5.99 

7.70 

Red  miso, 

50.16 

48.66 

32.28 

12.48 

6.46 

2.31 

2.72 

10.40 

1.18 

10.84 

12.40 

Table  V.  indicates  a  high  percentage  of  substance  soluble  in  cold  water. 
This  fact  makes  it  very  convenient  material  to  be  used  in  soups.  A 
trace  of  alcohol  is  present  also. 


Soy  Bean  Sauce  (Shoyu). 

1.  One  part  each  of  beans,  wheat  and  common  salt  and  2  parts  of  water 
are  used. 

2.  Roast  and  pulverize  wheat. 

3.  Steam  and  mash  the  beans  as  in  case  of  miso.     Cool  to  40°  C. 

4.  Add  powdered  wheat  in  the  proportion  of  70  parts  of  the  caked 
beans  to  30  parts  of  the  wheat  by  weight.     Mash  and  mix  thoroughly. 

5.  Add  spores  of  Aspergillus  oryzoe,  then  mix.  Spread  upon  wooden 
vessels  or  trays,  about  3  liters  per  tray.  The  trays  are  stacked  away  in 
a  cellar  where  the  temperature  is  kept  somewhat  above  40°  C.  (After 
twenty  to  twenty-five  hours,  the  mycelium  of  the  fungus  will  be  found; 
evolution  of  CO2  and  heat  is  observed  as  the  fermentation  proceeds; 
after  about  six  days  the  growth  of  the  fungus  is  completed,  and  an  abund- 
ance of  yellowish  spores,  "perithecia,"  is  present.  The  temperature  is 
kept  approximately  at  27°  to  28°  C.)  Dry  the  material  and  grind.  This 
is  the  shoyu-koji. 

6.  Heat  the  required  amount  of  water  and  salt  to  115°  to  118°  C. 
Cool  to  room  temperature. 

*  The  amount  to  be  added  varies  according  to  the  kind  of  miso  desired. 
2  K.  Oshima:  Loc.  Cit.  p.  30. 


10 


MASS.    EXPERIMENT    STATION    BULLETIN    182. 


7.  Mix  shoyu-koji  with  the  salt  solution. 

8.  Allow  the  mixture  to  ferment  in  casks  for  one  to  two  years  with 
frequent  stirring. 

9.  On  the  completion  of  fermentation,  filter  and  press. 

10.  Allow  filtrate  to  settle  for  two  or  three  days. 

11.  Remove  the  clear  supernatant  liquid  and  heat  it  at  70°  to  100°  C. 
in  a  double  boiler  from  two  to  three  hours. 

12.  To  improve  the  taste  it  is  common  to  add  a  certain  quantity  of 
sugar  or  sweet  sak6  during  the  heating  process. 

Note.  —  This  sauce  is  mainly  manufactured  in  zymo  factories  in  Japan, 
for  its  preparation  at  home  is  too  difficult.  It  is  a  thick,  dark  brown 
liquid  and  used  extensively  in  Japan  and  China.  It  may  be  used  in 
American  kitchens  for  soups,  gravies  and  vegetable  stews,  and  makes  a 
good  substitute  for  Worcestershire  sauce  or  any  other  table  sauce.  It 
has  very  slight  food  value,  but  its  merit  lies  in  its  flavor,  which  seems 
to  sharpen  the  appetite  and  accelerate  the  digestive  functions.^ 

Table  \l.  — Chemical  Composition  of  Shoyu  (Per  Cent.)^ 


NUMBEB 

Specific 
Gravity. 

Water. 

Protein.3 

Carbohydbate. 

Free 
Acid, 
mostly 
Lactic. 

Ash. 

Com- 
mon 
Salt. 

Phos- 
phoric 
Acid. 

OF 

Sample. 

Glucose. 

Dextrin. 

1,  .       . 

2,  .       . 

3,  .       . 

1.185 
1.190 
1.208 

62.39 
62.82 
60.58 

9.28 
9.53 
9.15 

2.70 
3.33 

5.85 

.69 

.69 

1.43 

1.18 

1.33 

.92 

18.48 
18.70 
20.14 

16.03 
15.67 
17.47 

.53 
.51 

.46 

Vegetable  Butter,  Ice  Cream,  Oil  (Table  Use)  and  Lard  (Cooking)  . 

The  manufacture  of  these  articles  from  soy  beans  needs  further  in- 
vestigation. To  say  anything  further  concerning  their  economical  and 
industrial  importance  at  the  present  time  would  be  premature. 


1  Pawlow:  The  Work  of  the  Digestive  Glands,  London,  1902. 

2  K.  Oshima:  Bull.  159,  32,  1905,  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agr.,  Office  of  Exp.  Sta. 

3  Consists  of  soluble  albumin,  peptone  and  further  cleavage  products.    Eisei  Shiken  Jho: 
Bull.  Imp.  Sanit.  Lab.,  Tokyo,  No.  8,  35,  1897. 


BULLETIN   No.   183. 


DEPARTMENT   OF  BOTANY. 


ROSE  CANKER  AND  ITS  CONTROL/ 


BY   P.  J.  ANDERSON. 


INTRODUCTION. 

Rose  canker  is  a  serious  disease  of  greenhouse  roses  which  was  first 
described  in  1917.  It  has  probably  been  long  prevalent  in  America,  but 
has  escaped  notice  largely  on  account  of  its  obspure  symptoms  and  con- 
sequent difficulty  of  diagnosis.  Its  ravages  were  formerly  assigned  to 
other  causes  or  left  unexplained.  Rose  growers  who  first  brought  it  to 
the  attention  of  this  station  in  November,  1916,  stated  that  they  had 
been  suffering  severe  losses  for  at  least  four  years.  After  conditions  in 
the  rose  houses  had  been  investigated,  the  situation  was  considered  so 
serious  that  work  was  immediately  begun  to  determine  more  of  the  nature 
of  the  disease,  and  especially  to  find  a  remedy  for  it.  The  investigation 
was  started  in  co-operation  with  L.  M.  Massey,  pathologist  of  the  Ameri- 
can Rose  Societj^,  who  first  observed  the  disease  two  months  before  this, 
and  had  already  decided  that  its  seriousness  warranted  a  thorough  inves- 
tigation. Research  at  the  Massachusetts  station  has  been  largely  confined 
to  determination  of  the  best  methods  of  controlling  the  disease  and  inves- 
tigation of  such  facts  in  the  life  history  of  the  causal  fungus  as  have  a 
direct  bearing  on  control  measures.  Massey  undertook  investigation  of 
other  phases  of  the  disease,  and  has  recently  published  his  results  (1917). 
A  successful  method  of  control  has  been  evolved  and  is  presented  in  this 
bulletin,  but  it  is  hoped  that,  as  a  result  of  long-term  experiments  now  in 
progress  in  commercial  houses,  this  method  will  be  improved  and,  pos- 
sibly, other  easier  methods  found.  However,  since  this  will  require  a 
number  of  years,  the  present  method  is  published  in  order  that  rose 
growers  who  are  troubled  with  the  disease  may  have  the  benefit  of  all 
that  we  already  know  about  canker  and  its  control. 

1  The  writer  is  greatly  indebted  to  Prof.  A.  Vincent  Osmun,  head  of  the  department  of  botany 
at  this  station,  for  much  valuable  assistance,  suggestions  and  criticism  of  the  manuscript  of  this 
bulletin. 


12  MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    183. 

Only  roses  under  glass  are  known  to  be  affected.  Some  varieties,  e.g., 
Hoosier  Beauty,  are  more  susceptible  than  others,  but  there  is  yet  no 
evidence  that  any  are  immune.  Massey  (1917)  observed  the  disease  on 
Hoosier  Beauty,  Ophelia,  Hadley,  Russell,  Sunburst,  American  Beauty 
and  many  seedlings.  It  has  been  reported  only  from  the  northern  and 
eastern  United  States,  but  closer  observation  will  probably  show  that 
it  has  a  much  wider  range. 

SYMPTOMS. 

The  disease  is  most  easily  recognized  by  brown  dead  areas  (cankers) 
in  the  bark  of  the  stems.  These  are  more  frequent  and  larger  at  the 
crown  than  higher  up,  but  any  part  of  the  stem  or  branches  may  be  at- 
tacked. Crown  cankers  may  be  below  the  surface,  just  at  the  surface, 
or,  more  often,  extending  up  the  stem,  sometimes  several  inches  (Plate  I., 
Fig.  1).  They  may  be  confined  to  one  side  or  may  girdle  the  stem.  The 
young  canker  is  blue-black  or  purplish  in  color  and  smooth,  but  as  it 
becomes  older  the  part  above  ground  becomes  reddish  brown,  dry,  hard 
and  cracked  longitudinally.  The  margin  is  definite,  and  the  dead  area 
becomes  sunken.  Frequently  the  part  of  the  stem  immediately  above 
the  canker  is  swollen  (Plate  II.).  When  the  subterranean  part  of  the 
canker  becomes  old  it  fs  soaked  and  "punky,"  and  the  bark  may  be 
rubbed  off  between  the  thumb  and  forefinger,  or  it  may  rot  away  entirely 
(Plate  I.,  Fig.  1).  Sometimes  a  callus  is  formed  around  the  edge  of  the 
canker. 

Two  types  of  cankers  occur  on  the  stem  and  branches  higher  up.  The 
larger  ones  start  from  wounds,  especially  the  stubs  which  are  left  after 
the  blossoms  are  cut  (Plate  I.,  Fig.  2).  Cankers  from  these  stubs  run 
back  down  the  stems.  The  canker  may  stop  at  the  first  live  branch 
below,  but  very  commonly  it  continues  to  progress  downward,  and  each 
successive  branch  dies  as  it  is  encircled  by  the  descending  canker.  Can- 
kers may  also  start  from  other  wounds  besides  cut  stubs.  They  are 
usually  oval  in  outline  and  may  be  several  inches  long.  The  second  type 
of  aerial  canker  does  not  originate  with  wounds,  but  starts  directly  in 
the  healthy  green  bark.  First,  small  round  purple  areas  appear,  some- 
times singly  but  more  often  in  groups.  As  these  increase  in  size  the  cen- 
ters become  light  brown  and  the  margins  remain  dark,  giving  a  "bird's- 
eye"  effect.  When  they  occur  in  groups  they  coalesce  and  form  large 
irregular  dead  areas  in  which,  however,  the  individual  cankers  may  still 
be  distinguished  for  some  time  (Plate  III.,  Fig.  2). 

The  depth  of  the  canker  varies,  depending  on  such  factors  as  the  age 
of  the  part  attacked,  size  of  the  infection  court,  environmental  condi- 
tions and  probably  others.  This  is  particularly  a  disease  of  the  bark, 
and  commonly  the  discolored  area  will  be  located  outside  the  cambium 
entirely.  But  in  more  severe  cankers  it  may  extend  to,  or  entirely  through, 
the  pith.  If  the  shoot  is  young  and  has  not  yet  hardened,  the  canker  goes 
deeper  and  the  entire  shoot  dies.     This  is  frequently  evidenced  in  the 


PLATE  I. 


Fig.  1 .  —  Old  canker  running  up  from  the  crown. 
Fig.  2.  —  Canker  running  down  from  a  cut  atub. 


PLATE  II. 


Canker  on  a  lateral  branch  showing  hypertrophy. 


PLATE   III. 


Fig.  1.  —  Canker  resulting  from  coalescence  of  a  number  of  small  ones  from  stomatal  infections. 
Fig.  2.  —  Five  cankers  on  a  single  stem. 


ROSE    CANKER   AND    ITS    CONTROL.  13 

sudden  wilting  and  dying  of  shoots  which  have  grown  up  rapidly  from 
below  the  surface  of  the  ground.    Older  shoots  are  rarely  killed  outright. 

Only  occasionally  have  we  seen  entire  plants  killed  by  this  disease. 
One,  several  or  all  of  the  shoots  of  a  plant  may  be  attacked.  Dead  "  brush  " 
and  dead  small  shoots  are  usually  much  in  evidence  in  affected  houses. 
The  seriousness  of  the  disease,  however,  lies  not  in  the  number  of  plants 
killed  but  in  the  fact  that  affected  plants  are  small  and  weaker,  resulting  in 
diminished  yields  of  inferior  roses.  The  diseased  plants  cannot  be  forced, 
no  matter  how  much  fertilizer  is  applied  and  how  well  they  are  cultivated. 
New  shoots  do  not  grow  from  beneath  the  surface  of  the  soil,  but  all 
come  from  the  tops.  These  latter  symptoms  are  the  ones  which  the 
florist  usually  notices  first,  and,  in  fact,  may  be  the  only  ones  he  notices. 

Diagnosis  of  this  disease  is  rendered  difficult  by  two  natural  develop- 
ments in  the  life  of  the  rose  plant  which  may  easily  be  confused  with 
disease:  (1)  Many  varieties  of  roses  naturally  turn  black  at  the  crown 
very  early;  this,  however,  is  a  superficial  blackening,  and  rarely  runs 
up  much  above  the  surface  of  the  ground.  (2)  The  bark  of  all  rose  stems 
cracks  with  age,  especially  at  the  base,  just  as  the  bark  of  trees  does. 
These  two  developments  often  resemble  canker  so  closely  that  even 
one  experienced  in  diagnosis  may  be  misled. 

DESCRIPTION    OF   THE    CAUSAL    FUNGUS. 

Rose  canker  is  produced  by  the  parasitic  growth  of  a  fungus,  Cylin- 
drocladium  scoparium  Morg.,  within  the  tissues  of  the  host  (rose  plant). 
Previous  to  1917  this  fungus  had  not  been  reported  as  a  parasite.  It  was 
first  found  in  Ohio  by  Morgan  (1892)  growing  on  an  old  pod  of  the  honey 
locust  {Gleditsia  triacanthus  L.).  Seven  years  later  it  was  reported  again 
by  Ellis  and  Everhart  (1900)  as  growing  on  dead  leaves  of  the  papaw 
tree  {Asimina  triloba  Dunal),  and  described  as  a  new  species,  Diplocladium 
cylitidrosporum  E.  and  E.;  but  a  study  of  the  type  materials  of  the  two 
species  by  Massey  showed  them  to  be  the  same.  As  far  as  the  literature 
shows,  these  are  the  only  times  that  the  organism  had  been  observed  up 
to  1916,  and  both  times  as  a  saprophyte. 

The  body  of  the  fungus  is  composed  of  (1)  mycelium,  (2)  sclerotia, 
(3)  sporophores  (conidiophores),  and  (4)  spores  (conidia).  These  four 
parts,  or  organs,  of  the  fungus  are  here  described  separately. 

Mycelium. 

The  mycelium  is  the  part  of  the  parasite  which  lives  inside  the  tissues 
of  the  rose  stem.  It  is  composed  of  many  microscopically  slender,  branch- 
ing, tubular  threads  (hyphoe)  which  grow  in  every  direction  through  the 
host  cells  for  the  purpose  of  securing  nourishment  from  them  for  the 
fungus.  Incidentally,  in  this  process,  the  cells  are  killed  and  turn  brown, 
thus  producing  the  canker.  The  hypha?  are  4  to  6  "  in  diameter,  and  are 
divided  by  cross-walls  (septa)  into  cells  5  to  20  times  as  long  as  their 


14 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    183. 


Fig. 


-Old  mycelium,  showing 
chlamydospores. 


diameter.  The  manner  of  branching  and  septation  is  shown  in  Fig.  1. 
When  the  myceUum  is  young  the  walls  are  thin  and  not  constricted,  or, 
at  most,  only  slightly  constricted,  at  the  septa.  The  contents  consist 
of  homogeneous  protoplasm.  Both  the  walls  and  contents  are  colorless, 
and  when  seen  in 
mass,  in  pure  cul- 
ture, look  like  white 
cotton.  But  when 
the  mycelium  be- 
comes older  it  be- 
comes brown,  the 
hypha?  are  gnarled 
and  twisted,  deeply 
constricted  at  the 
septa,  the  cells  short 
and  oval  or  globose, 
giving  one  the  im- 
pression   of    strings 

Fig.  1.- Young  mycelium    of     beads     (Fig.     2). 

from  culture.  The  cells  now  con- 

tain large  drops  of 
reserve  food,  and  the  walls  are  thick.  These  cells  are  probably  more 
resistant  to  adverse  conditions,  and  serve  to  carrj^  the  fungus  through 
unfavorable  periods.  They  may  be  called  chlamydospores.  Their  diam- 
eter is  much  greater  than  that  of  the  ordinary  hyphse,  as  indicated^by 
the  figures. 

SCLEROTIA. 

Sometimes  the  surface  of  old  cankers  is  dotted  over  vnth  minute  shining 
black  pimples  (Plate  II.).    They  are  usually  not  much  larger  than  a  pin 

point  and  never  as  large  as  a  pin  head. 
To  the  naked  ej'e  they  look  like  pycnidia, 
but  microscopic  examination  always 
proves  them  to  be  sterile  balls  of  thick- 
walled  pseudoparenchymatous  fungous 
cells  (typical  sclerotia) .  Thej^  are  directly 
under  the  epidermis,  but  this  does  not 
obscure  their  shining  black  prominence. 
In  certain  culture  media  they  are  pro- 
duced in  great  abundance.  The  cells  are 
much  like  the  chlamydospores;  in  fact, 
the  sclerotia  seem  to  be  only  a  further 
development  of  the  chlamydospore-forming  hypha*,  and  all  gradations 
between  the  two  maj'  be  found.  Their  function  is  probably  the  same 
as  that  of  the  chlamydospores.  A  thin  cross-section  of  one  is  shown  in 
Fig.  3. 


Fig.  3.  —  Thin  section  through  a 
sclerotiuni. 


ROSE  CANKER  AND  ITS  CONTROL. 


15 


Fig.  4.  —  Tuft  of  conidiophores 
on  a  dead  rose  stem. 


CONIDIOPHORES. 

The  conidia,  or  ordinary  spores,  —  as  distinguished  from  the  chlam- 
ydospores,  —  are  borne  on  special  upright  branches,  —  conidiophores. 
These  are  produced  in  great  abundance  in  artificial  culture,  but  are 
rarely  seen  on  the  cankers.  The  writer  has  found  them  occasionally  just 
at  the  surface  of  the  ground  on  young  shoots 
recently  killed  by  the  pathogene.  But  in 
badly  infested  rose  beds  which  are  kept  wet 
they  are  produced  in  great  abundance  on 
dead  shoots  and  parts  of  the  rose  plants 
which  are  cut  off  and  left  to  decay  on  the 
ground  under  the  bushes.  To  the  naked  eye 
the  dead  shoots  seem  to  be  dusted  over  in 
patches  with  a  white  powder.  Under  a 
strong  hand  lens  —  or  better,  a  binocular 
microscope  —  each  particle  of  this  white 
powder  is  seen  to  be  composed  of  a  tuft  of 

slender-stalked  "brooms"  with  glistening  white  heads.  One  of  these 
tufts  is  shown  in  Fig.  4.  Each  httle  broom  is  a  conidiophore  with  its 
mass  of  conidia  on  the  apex.  The  number  of  conidiophores  in  a  tuft 
varies  from  5  to  40,  or  more.  No  de- 
tails, further  than  shown  by  Fig.  4,  can 
be  made  out 
under  the  bin- 
oculars. Under 
the  compound 
microscope, 
however,  it  is 
possible  to  de- 
termine accu- 
rately the  struc- 
ture of  these 
little  brooms. 
Examined  in 
the  dry  condi- 
tion they  ap- 
pear as  in  Fig. 
5,  where  the 
conidia  are 
cemented  to- 
gether into  a  solid  head.  But  when  mounted  in  water  the  cement 
which  holds  them  together  dissolves,  many  of  them  float  away,  and 
the  head  becomes  loose  as  represented  in  Fig.  6.  The  main  stem  of  the 
conidiophore  may  be  unbranched  up  to  just  below  the  conidia,  as  repre- 
sented by  Fig.  5,  or  it  may  show  one  or  more  monopodial  branches  at 


Fig.  5. — Conidiophores  and 
conidia  as  seen  in  a  dry 
condition. 


Fig.  6.  —  Conidiopliores  as  seen  when 
mounted  in  water,  many  of  the  conidia 
washed  away. 


16 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    183. 


various  heights.  The  spores  are  frequently  borne  on  lateral  branches 
of  this  stem  (Fig.  6),  while  the  main  stem  is  continued  upward  and 
terminates  in  an  enlarged  club.  The  ultimate  branchlets,  and  one  or 
two  series  below  them,  are  usually  in  threes,  as  shown  in  Fig.  5,  but 
twos  are  not  uncommon.  In  regard  to  the  dimensions  of  the  co- 
nidiophore,  Morgan  (1892)  writes:  "the  fertile  hyphaj  have  a  simple 
septate  stem  5  to  7  /^  in  thickness,  and  are  dissolved  above  into  a  level- 
topped  cyme  of  branches;  their  height,  exclusive  of  the  spores  which 
easily  fall  off,  is  125  to  150  z'."  Ellis  and  Everhart  (1900)  give  the  di- 
mensions as  50-110  X  5-6  //.  In  pure 
culture  the  writer  has  found  them  taller 
than  the  above  measurements;  an  average 
of  50  conidiophores  grown  on  potato  agar 
gave  291  ^t,  and  the  diameter  of  the  stalk, 
6.6.  fi. 

CONIDIA. 

The   conidia  are 

long,       cylindrical, 

obtuse  at  each  end, 

hyaline,     divided 

into   2    cells  by   a 

septum    at    the 

center  (Fig.  7).  The 

contents  are  at  first 

homogeneous,    but 

later    show    vacu- 
oles   or    oil    drops 

(Fig.  8).  Morgan 
(1892)  gives  the  dimensions  as  40-50  x  4  //  at  the  apex,  and  3  /^  at  the 
base;  Ellis  and  Everhart  (1900),  40-50x4-5/^;  Massey  (1917),  36-55  x 
3.3-4.51  fi,  with  an  average  of  48.3  x  4.13 /i.  The  writer  found  the  aver- 
age of  50  on  a  young  potato  agar  culture  to  be  48.8  x  5.1^;  50  on  a 
two-months'  culture,  39.2  x  4.03//;  50  produced  on  a  pod  of  Gleditsia, 
41x4.1/^. 

LIFE  HISTORY  OF  THE  FUNGUS. 

Before  any  measure  of  control  could  be  intelligenth^  attempted  it 
was  first  necessary  to  become  intimately  acquainted  with  the  life  history 
of  the  causal  organism  (the  pathogene) .  In  the  studies  which  are  recorded 
below  most  attention  was  directed  to  those  points  which  appeared  to 
have  a  direct  connection  with  control.  Nevertheless,  in  order  to  become 
familiar  with  the  entire  life  cycle,  certain  phases  of  development  which 
have  no  obvious  connection  had  to  be  investigated.  For  convenience  in 
discussion,  the  life  history  is  treated  under  three  heads :  — 

1.  Germination  of  the  spores. 

2.  Parasitic  life  of  the  fungus  (pathogenesis). 

3.  Saprophytic  life  of  the  fungus. 


Fig.  7. —  Germinating  conidia. 


Fig.  8.  —  Old  conidia. 


ROSE    CANKER   AND    ITS   CONTROL.  17 


Germination  of  the  Spores. 

The  life  cycle  begins  with  germination  of  the  spores.  The  first  essential 
condition  for  germination  is  the  presence  of  water.  Spores  never  ger- 
minate except  when  they  are  directly  in  water.  A  moist  atmosphere  is 
not  sufficient.  Germination  takes  place  through  the  production  of  one 
or  more  tubes  from  each  of  the  two  cells  of  the  spore.  Usually  the  tubes- 
do  not  start  at  the  same  time;  one  in  each  cell  begins  to  grow,  and  this 
is  later  followed  by  another.  Four  germ  tubes  to  each  spore  is  the  most 
frequent  condition,  but  there  may  be  more  or  fewer.  The  tubes  may 
come  out  from  any  place  on  the  surface  of  the  spores,  as  illustrated  in 
Fig.  7.  They  elongate  very  rapidly  at  laboratory  temperatures,  quickly 
develop  septa,  branch  repeatedly  and  soon  a  mycelium  is  produced. 

The  brown  thick-walled  cells  of  the  mycelium,  which  we  have  called 
chlamydospores,  germinate  by  the  production  of  slender  hyaline  germ 
tubes  similar  to  those  of  the  conidia  and  under  the  same  conditions. 
Other  detached  cells  of  the  mycelium  also  possess  the  power  of  germina- 
tion. Especially  is  it  common  to  see  germ  tubes  arising  from  the  cells  of 
the  main  stem  of  the  conidiophore  when  detached  and  kept  in  water. 
Such  germ  tubes  usually  arise  from  the  end  walls  of  the  cells,  and  may 
grow  directly  through  one  or  more  old  cells  before  emerging. 

Temperature  Relations. 
The  relation  of  temperature  to  germination  of  spores  was  studied 
carefully  in  the  hope  of  evolving  some  method  of  control  by  keeping  the 
rose  houses  at  temperatures  which  are  unfavorable  for  germination  and 
thus  retarding  progress  of  the  disease.  The  general  effect  of  variation 
of  temperature  and  the  maximum,  minimum  and  optimum  temperature 
for  germination  were  determined  by  the  following  method :  — 

Method.  —  Viable  spores  from  a  young,  pure  culture  were  transferred  to  a  drop 
of  water  in  the  center  of  a  glass  slide.  The  slide  was  supported  on  two  short  glass 
rods  in  a  Petri  dish,  used  as  a  moist  chamber.  A  few  drops  of  water  placed  in 
the  bottom  of  the  dish  kept  the  air  humid  and  prevented  drying  out  of  the  drop 
containing  the  spores.  The  Petri  dish  was  then  kept  at  the  desired  constant  tem- 
perature in  incubator,  refrigerator  or  constant  temperature  room.  Observations 
were  taken  and  percentages  of  germination  counted  at  regular  intervals.  No  figures 
are  based  on  the  results  from  a  single  slide.  Each  result  tabulated  represents  the 
average  of  several  slides.  Tests  at  high  or  low  temperatures  were  controlled  by 
duplicates  at  ordinary  room  temperatures. 


The  results  of  the  tests  are  summarized  in  Table  I. 


18 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    183. 


Table  I.  —  Effect  of  Temperature  Variation  on  Spore  Gerrnvnation . 


Temperature,  Centigrade 

(Degrees). 

Period  before  starting  to 
germinate  (Hours). 

Percentage  of  Germina- 
tion in  24  Hours. 

5 

- 

0 

S-9,  . 

24 

1  (2  per  cent,  in  48  hours). 

12,     . 

5 

95 

15,     . 
17,     . 

Not  observed  before  7  hours,  when 

about  20  per  cent,  had  started. 

4-5 

95 
95 

20,     . 

4i 

95 

22-23, 

3-4 

95 

25-26, 

2-3J 

95 

28,     . 
30,     . 

Not    observed    before    6i   hours, 

when  95  per  cent,  had  germinated. 

6^ 

95 
95 

31,     . 

6i 

70 

33.5, 

6i 

21  (Erratic  and  abnormal) 

36,     . 

4 

70 

37.5, 

- 

0 

40,     . 

' 

- 

0 

It  is  apparent  from  these  tests  that  spores  germinate  at  any  tempera- 
ture between  8°  and  36°  C.  Between  12°  and  30°  the  percentage  of 
germination  was  almost  total,  ranging  from  95  to  100  per  cent,  (all 
marked  95  per  cent,  in  the  table).  Within  these  limits  there  was  prac- 
tically no  variation  of  percentage  due  to  temperature.  In  other  words, 
if  the  optimum  temperature  is  to  be  determined  by  percentage  germina- 
tion alone,  it  is  very  wide.  Below  12°  the  percentage  drops  off  rapidly 
until  at  8°  to  9°  we  get  but  1  per  cent,  in  twenty-four  hours.  Germina- 
tion ceases  altogether  below  this.  Between  the  temperatures  of  31°  and 
36°  it  is  difficult  to  express  the  effects  of  temperature  in  percentages. 
Not  only  is  germination  erratic,  varying  greatly  in  slides  apparently 
treated  alike,  but  it  may  also  be  so  abnormal  that  it  is  difficult  to  de- 
termine just  what  constitutes  germination.  The  spores  assume  peculiar 
shapes  by  the  development  of  knobs  or,  more  commonly,  globose  swellings 
twice  the  diameter  of  the  spores.  These  vary  in  number  and  location, 
but  most  frequently  they  are  on  the  ends  of  the  spores.  Very  slender 
unbranched  germ  tubes  may  grow  for  a  time  from  these.  The  percentage 
of  spores  affected  does  not  gradually  diminish  to  form  a  regular  curve. 
Thus,  in  one  test  at  36°,  70  per  cent,  were  affected  in  this  way.  But 
at  37.5°  there  was  no  germination  or  change  in  the  spores  which  could 
be  detected  with  the  microscope.  The  effect  of  temperature  v£.riation 
is  more  apparent  in  the  tivie  required  for  germination  to  begin  than  in 


ROSE    CANKER   AND    ITS   CONTROL.  19 

the  final  percentage  of  germination.  In  this  respect  there  is  a  rather 
regular  curve.  The  optimum  is  at  about  25°,  where  germination  begins  in 
two  to  three  and  one-half  hours.  At  12°  it  required  five  hours,  and  at  S° 
no  germination  was  apparent  until  after  twenty-four  hours.  The  fact  that 
spores  do  not  germinate  at  a  certain  temperature  does  not  mean  that 
they  are  dead.  Spores  kept  for  two  daj's  at  5°  showed  not  the  least  indi- 
cation of  germination,  but  when  brought  back  to  ordinary  room  tem- 
peratures they  quickly  germinated  to  over  95  per  cent.  Experiments 
to  be  described  later  show  that  spores  may  be  kept  for  long  periods  at 
temperatures  both  lower  and  higher  than  indicated  in  this  table  and 
still  retain  their  viability. 

Apparently  there  is  little  opportunity  for  retarding  the  progress  of  the 
disease  by  maintaining  temperatures  in  the  house,  unfavorable  to  the 
fungus,  because  the  optimum  temperature  for  spore  germination  is  ap- 
proximately the  same  as  the  optimum  for  growing  roses.  The  latitude 
of  the  germination  optimum  is  also  unfavorable  to  such  a  method  of 
control. 

Effect  of  freezing  the  Spores. 

It  is  a  well-known  fact  that  the  spores  —  especially  the  conidia  —  of 
many  fungi  are  quickly  killed  by  freezing,  and  this  weakness  may  be 
utilized  in  checking  disease.  The  purpose  of  the  present  investigation 
was  to  determine  whether  the  spores  of  Cylindrocladium  can  be  killed  by 
freezing,  and  if  so,  how  much  exposure  is  required.  Two  methods  were 
used. 

First  Method.  —  Petri  dishes  containing  young  cultures  with  abundance  of  spores 
were  exposed  to  out-of-door  temperatures  of  — 3°  to  - — 10°C.  Checks  were  first 
made  at  room  temperatures  to  test  the  viability  of  the  spores.  Spores  were  re- 
moved from  the  frozen  plates  at  regular  intervals  and  put  to  germinate  in  moist 
chambers  at  ordinary  room  temperatures,  as  described  above  in  spore  germination 
tests.    By  this  method  the  spores  were  dry  when  frozen. 

After  about  two  hours  the  percentage  of  germination  began  to  decline; 
in  eight  hours  it  had  fallen  to  10  per  cent.;  in  twelve  hours,  to  less  than 
1  per  cent.;  and  at  the  end  of  fourteen  hours  there  was  no  germination 
whatever.    All  checks  germinated  95  per  cent. 

Second  Method.  —  Spores  were  transferred  from  plates  along  with  a  portion  of 
the  agar  to  drops  of  water  on  slides.  All  was  macerated  until  the  spores  were  well 
distributed  through  the  water.  They  were  immediately  put  outside  to  freeze  and 
one  slide  brought  into  the  laboratory  at  the  end  of  each  hour  and  tested  for  ger- 
mination. 

The  results  were  very  similar  to  those  obtained  by  the  first  method. 
Freezing  for  one  hour  seemed  not  to  affect  them  at  all;  in  two  hours  the 
percentage  dropped  to  from  75  to  80  per  cent.;  in  three  hours,  to  30  per 
cent.;  in  six  and  one  half  hours,  to  25  per  cent.;  in  ten  hours,  to  1  per 
cent.    From  1  to  2  per  cent,  germinated  even  after  exposures  of  twenty- 


20  MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    183. 

four  hours,  but  these  were  spores  in  the  center  of  the  drop  of  water,  or 
directly  in  the  agar,  which  seemed  to  give  them  some  protection.  There 
was  no  germination  whatever  after  thirty-six  hours. 

The  first  method  more  nearly  approximates  natural  conditions,  but 
under  any  conditions  we  may  safely  draw  the  conclusion  from  these 
experiments  that  all  spores  are  killed  by  freezing  during  thirty-six  hours. 

Thermal  Death  Point  of  Spores. 
Investigation  of  this  point  was  undertaken  with  a  view  to  the  possi- 
bility of  sterilization  by  heat.  Thermal  death  point  is  defined  as  the 
lowest  temperature  at  which  an  organism  is  killed  by  an  exposure  for  ten 
minutes.  Since  tliis  point  might  be  different  for  spores  than  for  mycelium, 
each  was  tried  separately. 

Method.  —  Spores  from  a  young  culture  immersed  in  a  drop  of  water  were  placed 
in  a  thin  pipette  tube,  sealed  at  one  end  and  covered  with  a  rubber  cap  at  the 
other.  The  tubes  were  then  dropped  into  vessels  of  water  kept  at  the  desired 
temperature.  Each  vessel  was  supplied  with  a  thermometer,  and  could  be  iieated 
by  a  Bunsen  burner  when  necessary.  After  ten  minutes  the  tubes  were  removed, 
the  sealed  end  filed  off,  and  the  spores  forced  out  through  it  on  to  a  glass  slide 
by  pressing  the  rubber  cap  at  the  other  end.  The  slides  were  then  put  in  moist 
chambers  as  previously  described  in  germination  tests.  These  were  kept  at  ordi- 
nary laboratory  temperatures.  Temperatures  at  intervals  of  1°,  from  40°  to  55°, 
were  tried.    All  tests  were  made  in  duplicate  several  times. 

Up  to  and  including  46°  the  spores  did  not  seem  to  be  affected  by  ten- 
minute  exposures.  Above  this  the  percentage  remaining  alive  declined 
very  rapidly  to  the  absolute  thermal  death  point  of  49°,  At  this  tem- 
perature none  ever  germinated. 

It  was  also  found  that  spores  can  be  killed  at  lower  temperatures  than 
49°  by  exposing  them  for  longer  periods.  In  some  previous  experiments  it 
had  been  determined  that  they  are  killed  by  an  exposure  to  37.5°  for 
twenty-four  hours.  At  42°  they  are  killed  in  two  hours.  To  determine 
the  efTect  of  varying  the  period  of  exposure  at  a  given  temperature,  40° 
was  selected  as  a  standard,  and  spores  exposed  (in  drops  of  water  on 
slides  in  Petri  dishes)  during  periods  differing  by  intervals  of  one  hour. 
They  were  then  brought  back  to  room  temperature  and  tested  as  above. 
The  results  of  this  series  are  given  in  Table  II. 


ROSE    CANKER   AND   ITS   CONTROL. 


21 


Table  II.  —  Germination  of  Spores  after  Exposure  to  a  Temperature  of 

40°  C. 


Period  of  Exposure  (Hours). 


Time  required 
after  Removal  to  Room 

Temperature  before 
beginning  to  germinate. 


Percentage  of 
Germination  after 
24  Hours  at  Room 

Temperature 
(20-24°  C). 


9,  12,  14,  18,  20, 


95  per  cent,  in   3J   hours. 

Not  observed  sooner. 
2J  hours.    Just  starting. 

3  hours.    Just  starting. 

60  per  cent,  after  5  hours. 

At    least    longer    than    4 

hours. 
1  per  cent,  in  7  hours. 

At    least    longer    than    6 
hours. 


Over  95 

Over  95 

Over  95 

Over  95 

50 

3 

0  5 

0 

0 


It  will  be  noticed  that  the  longer  the  period  of  exposure,  the  longer  the 
time  required  for  germination  after  being  removed  to  room  temperature. 
There  was  no  decrease  in  the  percentage  of  germination  until  after  four 
hours.  From  this  point  it  dropped  rapidly  to  less  than  1  per  cent,  in 
six  and  one-half  hours,  and  no  germination  whatever  after  seven  and  one- 
half  hours. 

Effect  of  Desiccation  on  the  Spores. 

The  length  of  time  during  which  spores  are  able  to  live  in  a  dry  condi- 
tion may  have  an  important  bearing  on  dissemination  of  a  fungus  and 
spread  of  a  disease.  Neither  the  thinness  of  the  walls  nor  character  of  the 
spore  contents  of  Cylindrocladium  would  lead  one  to  expect  great  lon- 
gevity. The  following  method  was  used  to  determine  longevity  at 
ordinary  room  humidity :  — 

Method.  —  The  lids  of  Petri  dishe.s,  containing  pure  cultures  of  Cylindrocladium 
with  abundance  of  conidia,  were  lifted  enough  to  allow  the  thin  film  of  agar  to 
become  hard  and  dry  within  a  day  or  two.  At  intervals  of  one  day  spores  were 
transferred  from  these  dishes  to  drops  of  water  on  slides  in  Petri  dishes,  as  pre- 
viously described  for  other  germination  tests.  The  percentages  of  germination 
were  determined  after  the  spores  were  kept  in  moist  chambers  for  twenty-four 
hours.  All  checks  —  made  from  the  cultures  before  tilting  the  lids  —  germinated 
to  over  95  per  cent.  Several  hundred  spores  were  transferred  for  each  test.  Three 
different  Petri  dish  cultures  were  used  at  different  times. 


In  every  trial  the  percentage  of  germination  began  to  decline  after 
twenty-four  hours.  In  two  days  it  had  dropped  to  25  per  cent.;  in  five 
days,  to  10  per  cent.  After  ten  days  not  more  than  1  per  cent,  germinated, 
and  in  no  case  was  any  germination  observed  after  drying  for  fifteen  days. 


22  MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    183. 

The  longevity  of  conidia,  then,  appears  to  be  very  limited  when  kept 
in  a  dry  condition.  When  the  atmosphere  is  kept  ver_y  humid  they  live 
longer,  at  least  several  weeks,  but  no  careful  investigation  has  been 
undertaken  to  determine  just  how  long  with  each  degree  of  humidity. 
If  water  stands  on  them,  even  in  the  culture  dish,  they  germinate  and 
then  quickly  die  if  dried  out  at  once. 

Parasitic  Life  of  the  Fungus. 
Pathogenicity. 
In  order  to  prove  that  an  organism  is  the  causal  factor  of  a  certain 
disease  there  are  four  requirements  —  called  the  four  rules  of  proof  — 
which  pathologists  all  agree  must  be  fulfilled.  These  are:  (1)  find  the 
organism  constantly  associated  with  the  disease;  (2)  isolate  the  organism, 
grow  and  study  it  in  pure  cultures;  (3)  produce  the  disease  again  by 
inoculation  from  these  pure  cultures;  (4)  reisolate  the  organism  and  prove 
by  culture  its  identity  with  the  organism  which  was  first  found.  These 
four  rules  were  complied  with  by  Massey  (1917),  and  the  pathogenicity 
of  Cylindrocladium  scoparium  established.  The  present  writer  has  also 
given  the  four  rules  repeated  test,  and  obtained  results  similar  to  those 
of  Massey.  These  experiments  are  not  described  in  detail  here,  but 
only  certain  notes  on  each  of  the  four  steps  recorded. 

1.  Constant  association  of  the  pathogene  with  the  canker  is  not  so 
easy  to  establish  as  in  most  fungous  diseases  because  the  fungus  can  rarely 
be  seen  with  the  naked  eye  on  cankers  in  rose  houses.  Nevertheless,  the 
writer  has  occasionally  been  able  to  find  a  white  band  of  conidia  around 
cankers  on  young  shoots  just  at  the  surface  of  the  ground.  Almost  always 
when  a  canker  is  kept  in  a  moist  chamber  for  twenty-four  hours  or  longer 
the  mycelium  grows  out  as  long,  straight,  white  hypha^,  which  can  readily 
be  recognized  as  peculiar  to  Cyhndrocladium  by  one  who  has  become 
acquainted  with  the  appearance  of  this  fungus.  Also,  after  a  few  days 
in  the  moist  chamber,  conidia  usually  begin  to  develop  on  the  surface. 
The  presence  of  the  pathogene  in  old  cankers  is  also  often  betrayed  bj' 
sclerotia,  —  small,  flat,  shining  black  specks  just  under  the  epidermis. 
Yet  the  writer  has  often  found  cankers  in  which  the  organism  could  not 
be  determined  in  any  of  the  above  ways.  There  seems  to  be  only  one 
absolutely  sure  way  of  determining  association  of  the  pathogene  in  all 
cases,  and  that  is  by  making  isolations,  which  is  really  a  part  of  the  sec- 
ond rule  of  proof. 

2.  The  following  has  been  found  the  most  satisfactory  method  of 
isolation :  — 

Method.  —  The  surface  of  the  canker  is  first  sponged  with  mercuric  chloride 
1-1,000.  Scalpels  and  steel  needles  are  kept  in  a  jar  of  95  per  cent,  alcohol.  The 
epidermis,  or  at  least  a  thin  outer  layer  of  the  canker,  is  then  peeled  off  with  a 
scalpel  from  which  the  alcohol  has  been  burned  over  a  Bunsen.  Another  scalpel 
sterilized  in  the  same  way  is  used  to  cut  out  a  portion  of  the  peeled  canker.    It  is 


ROSE  CANKER  AND  ITS  CONTROL.         23 

then  removed  -with  a  flamed  needle  to  a  flask  of  sterile  water,  washed,  and  trans- 
ferred to  a  potato  agar  slant  —  or  somcthnes  poured  plates  are  used.  One  or  two 
drops  of  lactic  acid  are  added  to  the  tube  of  agar  when  slanted.  The  acid  not  only 
prevents  growth  of  bacteria,  but  also  seems  to  make  the  medium  more  favorable 
for  the  growth  of  Cylindrocladium.  Occasionally  other  agars,  such  as  corn  meal, 
oat,  lima  bean,  Czapek's  and  Cook's  No.  2,  have  been  successfully  used,  and  there 
is  no  objection  to  them.  The  almost  constant  use  of  potato  agar  in  the  present 
investigation  is  due  more  to  habit  and  convenience  than  to  any  advantage  over 
other  media.  In  the  case  of  small  initial  cankers  the  epidermis  was  not  peeled 
off.  The  mj'celium  grows  up  into  the  air  and  into  the  agar  very  quickly,  and  after 
some  experience  one  is  able  with  the  naked  eye  to  distinguish  within  twenty-four 
hours  the  growth  of  Cylindrocladium  from  that  of  other  fungi  he  is  apt  to  meet 
with  on  roses.  But  if  there  is  any  doubt,  he  has  but  to  wait  another  day  or  two, 
and  spores  are  produced  by  which  this  fungus  can  be  absolutely  identified. 

Other  methods  of  isolation  besides  tissue  transfers  have  been  successfully  used. 
Where  spores  are  present,  or  where  they  have  been  developed  in  moist  chambers, 
cultures  are  very  easily  made  by  touching  them  with  the  tip  of  a  sterile  platinum 
needle,  —  first  thrusting  the  needle  into  the  agar  so  that  more  spores  will  adhere,  — 
and  then  transferring  to  agar  slants.  When  the  sclerotia  were  first  discovered  on 
the  cankers  there  was  some  question  as  to  their  connection  with  Cylindrocladium. 
Some  of  them  were  picked  out  under  the  binoculars  with  a  sterile  needle,  freed 
from  all  clinging  rose  tissue,  washed  in  sterile  water,  and  transferred  to  agar  plates. 
In  this  way,  also,  pure  cultures  were  obtained. 

By  the  first  method  described,  the  organism  has  been  isolated  in  pure 
culture  from  hundreds  of  tj'pical  cankers.  In  order  to  determine  the  very 
youngest  stages,  a  number  of  stems  showing  the  little  round  lesions  (de- 
scribed under  "Symptoms");  from  the  size  of  a  pin  point  to  several 
millimeters  in  diameter,  were  brought  into  the  laboratory,  washed  merely 
with  sterile  water,  and  transfers  made  as  above.  Pure  cultures  were 
obtained  from  even  the  smallest  of  them. 

The  relation  of  the  pathogene  to  dead  stubs  was  also  determined  in 
this  way.  After  the  flower  is  cut,  one  or  more  shoots  quickly  grow  out 
from  below  the  cut  end  of  the  stem.  The  topmost  one,  however,  is  usually 
some  distance  below  the  cut  surface,  and  a  viseless  stub  is  left  from  1  inch 
to  3  or  4  inches  long.  This  stub  usually  dies  slowly  from  the  apex  back 
to  the  first  branch,  where  it  is  apt  to  stop.  When  the  canker  disease  is 
prevalent  in  the  house,  however,  the  dying  frequently  does  not  stop  at 
the  first  shoot  but  continues  down  the  stem,  and  the  shoots  die  as  they 
are  encircled  by  the  descending  dead  area.  Frequentlj'  the  fruiting  bodies 
of  various  species  of  fungi,  such  as  Pestalozzia,  Phoma,  etc.,  can  be  found 
on  these  stubs,  but  in  other  cases  no  spores  could  be  found.  A  large 
number  of  them  were  collected  from  a  house  knowTi  to  be  infested,  and 
transfers  made.  Cylindrocladium  was  obtained  from  over  half  of  them. 
After  they  were  found  to  be  infested  in  some  cases,  more  attention  was 
directed  to  them  and  the  sclerotia  frequently  observed.  It  was  from 
these  sclerotia  that  the  pure  cultures  mentioned  above  were  obtained. 

Study  of  the  fungus  in  pure  culture  will  be  described  later. 

3.  Plants  were  inoculated  in  four  different  ways:  — 


24  MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    183. 

Methods  of  Inoculation.  —  (a)  Stems  wounded,  inoculated  with  agar  in  which 
the  fungus  was  growing,  kept  moist  several  days  with  moist  cotton,  ih)  Same  as 
(a),  but  the  plants  not  wounded,  (c)  Wounded,  spores  sprayed  over  the  plants 
with  an  atomizer,  and  kept  for  several  days  under  a  bell  jar.  {d)  Same  as  (c), 
but  plants  not  wounded.  All  these  methods  were  controlled  by  checks  treated  in 
the  same  way  except  for  applying  the  fungus. 

Typical  cankers  were  produced  by  all  four  methods  of  inoculation. 
The  shortest  incubation  period  —  time  between  inoculation  and  first 
appearance  of  symptoms  —  was  four  days  on  the  wounded  plants  and 
five  days  on  the  unwounded  ones.  The  rate  of  development  of  the  canker 
after  it  first  appears  varies  greatly.  On  some  plants  which  were  first 
wounded  and  kept  under  bell  jars  the  cankers  were  over  a  centimeter 
across  in  two  weeks,  but  if  the  bell  jars  were  removed  and  the  humidity 
of  the  air  diminished,  the  cankers  grew  very  slowly.  Small  aerial  cankers 
usually  soon  stop  growing  altogether  unless  several  of  them  occur  close  to- 
gether, or  unless  they  are  kept  very  moist.  Crown  cankers  grow  more 
rapidly  than  cankers  higher  up,  but  their  rate  of  growth  becomes  de- 
cidedly slower  as  they  advance  above  the  surface  of  the  soil. 

4.  Reisolations  were  very  readily  made  from  a  number  of  the  cankers 
produced  by  artificial  inoculation.  The  fungus  was  obtained  in  pure 
culture,  and  easily  identified  by  its  cultural  and  morphological  characters 
as  Cylindrocladium  scoyarium. 

Infection  Court. 
The  artificial  inoculations  described  above  indicate  that  a  wound  is 
not  necessary  for  infection.  All  observations  indicate,  however,  that  a 
wound  is  a  very  favorable  infection  court.  A  great  many  of  the  basal 
cankers  start  from  the  union  of  stock  and  scion;  aerial  cankers  from  the 
cut  surfaces  of  stubs  and  from  various  bruises  made  by  tools,  etc.  Even 
where  no  wound  appeared,  it  seemed  possible  that  there  might  be  small 
wounds  not  readily  visible  to  the  naked  eye.  In  order  to  determine 
whether  such  was  the  case,  and  if  not,  to  determine  whether  any  natural 
openings  in  the  epidermis  serve  as  infection  courts,  artificial  inoculations 
were  made  by  spraying  spores  with  an  atomizer  on  what,  as  far  as  could 
be  seen  with  the  naked  eye,  seemed  to  be  perfectly  healthy  stems.  As 
soon  as  cankers  began  to  appear  they  were  cut  out,  fixed,  imbedded  in 
paraffin,  cut  into  serial  sections  and  stained.  Twenty-four  cankers 
varying  from  the  size  of  a  pin  point  to  2  millimeters  in  diameter  were 
used  and  cut  serially  to  a  thickness  of  8  n-.  In  no  case  was  any  wound 
through  the  epidermis  discovered.  But  in  every  case  a  stomate  was 
located  directly  at  or  very  near  the  center  of  the  canker.  In  the  larger 
cankers  there  were  several  stomates,  and  it  was  not  always  possible  to 
determine  the  point  of  entry.  In  the  smaller  ones,  however,  only  one 
was  present,  and  it  was  always  appfoximately  at  the  center.  A  number 
of  infections  were  also  discovered  which  were  so  small  that  they  had  not 


ROSE  CANKER  AND  ITS  CONTROL.         25 

been  seen  when  the  material  was  fixed.    In  some  cases  the  affected  cells 
extended  no  farther  than  5  or  6  rows  below  the  stomate. 

There  does  not  seem  to  be  any  reasonable  doubt  that  the  stomates 
serve  as  infection  courts,  and  that  the  little  round  lesions  on  the  smooth 
stems  are  largely  the  result  of  these  stomatal  infections. 

The  Mycelium  in  the  Host  Tissues. 
In  order  to  follow  the  course  of  the  mj'celium  after  it  has  entered  the 
rose  stem,  and  to  determine  its  effect  on  the  host  tissues,  cankers  in  every 
stage  of  development,  from  that  where  they  are  not  yet  visible  to  the 
naked  eye  up  to  the  old,  fully  developed  lesion,  were  sectioned,  stained 
and  studied. 

Method.  —  The  mycelium  is  very  difficult  to  follow  in  unstained  sections,  but 
after  some  experimenting  a  simple  taethod  of  treatment  was  found  by  which  the 
mycelium  could  be  very  distinctly  differentiated  in  the  host  cells.  Cankers  were 
fixed  in  Gilson's  fluid,  dehydrated  gradually,  and  cut  with  a  slide  microtome  from 
95  per  cent,  alcohol,  i  The  sections  were  then  stained  one  minute  in  a  saturated 
solution  of  safranin  in  95  per  cent,  alcohol,  excess  safranin  removed  by  trans- 
ferring to  95  per  cent,  alcohol  for  one  minute,  stained  one  minute  in  1  per  cent, 
gentian  violet  in  clove  oil,  and  cleared  in  clove  oil,  the  oil  washed  out  with  xylol 
and  the  sections  mounted  in  balsam.  This  method  is  very  rapid  and  any  number 
of  sections  can  be  stained  at  one  time. 

Before  describing  the  behavior  of  the  mycelium  in  the  tissues  it  will 
first  be  necessary  to  review  briefly  the  structure  of  a  normal  rose  stem. 
Fig.  9  represents  a  cross-section  of  a  stem  of  about  the  age  when  cankers 
are  most  frequent. 

Normal  Structure  of  the  Stem.  —  On  cutting  through  a  rose  stem  with 
a  knife,  one  very  readily  notices  that  it  is  composed  of  three  distinct 
parts,  (1)  a  rather  succulent  outer  cylinder  of  bark,  (2)  a  central  soft 
white  pith,  and  (3)  a  hard  cylinder  of  wood  between  the  two.  The  cell 
elements  which  occur  in  each  of  these  will  be  enumerated  in  order,  be- 
ginning with  the  outside. 

First,  the  stem  is  covered  with  a  smooth,  thin,  waterproof  coat,  —  the 
cuticle.  Just  beneath  this  is  the  one  layer  of  rather  flat  cells  composing 
the  epidermis.  Next  in  order  are  three  or  four  layers  of  cells  with  heavy 
walls  and  no  intercellular  spaces.  This  is  the  collenchyma.  The  cuticle, 
epidermis  and  collenchyma  form  an  air-tight,  water-tight  covering  of 
the  stem,  uninterrupted  except  by  the  stomates.  These  microscopic 
breathing  pores,  which  are  not  so  numerous  on  the  stem  as  in  the  leaves, 
are  guarded  and  strengthened  on  either  side  by  crescent-shaped  pro- 
jecting cells.  The  structure  of  the  stomate  can  best  be  understood  by 
reference  to  the  figure.  It  will  be  noticed  that  there  is  a  free  passage 
between  the  guard  cells  into  the  stomatal  cavity  beneath,  and  from  here 
to  the  loose,  thin-walled  cells  of  the  next  underlying  tissue,  the  chloren- 

1  Very  small  cankers  were  imbedded  in  paraffin,  sectioned  and  stained  in  the  usual  way;  but 
for  larger  cankers  this  was  found  to  be  unnecessary,  and  a  long  and  tedious  process. 


26 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    183. 


chj-ma.  Except  under  the  stomates,  where  it  is  thicker,  the  chlorenchyma 
is  composed  of  three  or  four  layers  of  cells  containing  around  the  inside 
of  the  walls  the  green  chloroplasts  which  give  the  color  to  the  bark.  Next 
in  order  are  the  large  thin-walled  cells  of  the  inner  cortex,  the  lowermost 


EPIDERffllS 


Fig.  9.  —  Transection  of  a  healthy  rose  stem. 


of  which  contain  abundant  starch  grains  in  storage.  Next  there  are 
areas  of  angular,  very  thick-walled  cells,  the  bast  fibers.  The  walls  are 
so  thick  that  there  is  hardly  any  opening  (lumen)  through  the  center. 
In  longisection  these  are  seen  to  be  shaped  like  long,  sharp-pointed  pencils, 
with  the  sharp  ends  overlapping.    Their  function  is  to  give  rigidity  and 


ROSE    CANKER   AND    ITS   CONTROL.  27 

strength.  The  areas  of  bast  fibers  do  not  form  a  complete  cylinder,  but 
the  inner  cortex  tissue  runs  down  between  them.  Just  under  each  bast 
area  there  is  a  region  of  tissue  called  phloem.  It  contains  long  tubes 
(sieve  tubes)  through  which  the  elaborated  plant  food  passes  down  through 
the  stem  from  the  leaves.  Each  sieve  tube  is  accompanied  by  a  line  of 
small  slender  cells  (companion  cells),  which  appear  in  transection  as 
though  they  were  cut  out  of  the  corners  of  the  sieve  tubes.  The  remain- 
ing cells  of  the  phloem  are  box-like  cells  called  phloem  parenchyma.  The 
phloem  is  bounded  below  by  the  cylinder  of  thin  flat  cells,  the  cambium, 
which  marks  the  line  of  cleavage  between  the  bark  and  wood. 

The  wood,  or  xjdem,  is  composed  mostly  of  four  kinds  of  cells:  (1) 
Box-like  parenchyma  cells  which  compose  the  broad  medullary  rays  as 
well  as  the  narrow  rays  one  cell  in  width.  (2)  Long  tubes  of  large  diam- 
eter (trachesB)  through  which  the  water  mainly  passes  from  the  roots 
to  the  parts  above.  The  walls  are  strengthened  by  spiral  or  annular 
thickenings.  (3)  Vertically  elongated  cells  (tracheids)  of  smaller  diameter 
and  thicker  walls,  also  water  carriers.  These  make  up  the  greater  portion 
of  the  wood.  (4)  Wood  fibers,  somewhat  smaller  in  diameter,  with  thick 
walls  and  long  tapering  points.  They  cannot  be  distinguished  from  the 
tracheids  in  transection.  Although  the  walls  of  all  the  xylem  elements 
are  heavy,  they  are  all  marked  with  pits  so  that  liquids  have  only  a  thin 
membrane  through  which  they  must  pass  to  go  from  one  cell  to  the  next. 

The  pith  (not  shown  in  the  figure)  is  composed  of  cells  of  only  one 
kind,  large  or  small,  somewhat  isodiametric  (parenchyma).  The  walls 
are  very  thin. 

Path  of  the  Mycelium.  —  The  germ  tube,  when  it  attacks  the  host,  is 
very  slender  and  easily  passes  between  the  guard  cells  down  into  the 
stomatal  cavity.  It  could  then  readily  pass  between  the  loose  cells  of 
the  chlorenchyma  and  inner  cortex,  but  it  does  not  choose  to  progress 
this  way.  Only  rarely  has  the  mycelium  been  seen  progressing  for  any 
considerable  distance  between  the  cells,  but  it  immediately  passes  into 
the  cells  by  means  of  holes  which  it  is  able  to  dissolve  through  the  walls. 
From  this  time  on  the  mj^celium  is  entirely  intracellular  except  for  the 
short  distances  through  which  it  sometimes  passes  from  one  cell  to  an- 
other. It  branches  profuselj^,  but  the  host 
cells  do  not  become  filled  with  mycelium. 
Rarely  are  more  than  one  or  two  strands 
seen  in  a  single  cell,  except  in  very  old 
cankers.  It  is  very  slender  and  delicate 
at  first,  but  in  age  becomes  brown  and 
takes  on  the  various  cell  forms  previously 
described  for  the  mycelium.  It  seems  to 
prefer  the  starch  storage  cells  of  the  inner      ^'''-  lO-- Young  mycelium  in 

,    .  ,  ,  , .  .  the  cells  of  the  inner  cortex. 

cortex,  and  m  cankers  of  medmm  age  is 

always  found  most  abundantly  in  these  cells  (Fig.  10).     However,  the 

other  cells  are  not  immune.     Mycelium  may  be  found  quite  abundantly 


28  MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    183. 

ill  the  collenchyma,  the  hea\y  walls  of  which  seem  to  offer  no  resistance 
whatever  to  the  progress  of  the  invader.  Occasionally  it  has  been  found 
even  in  the  epidermal  cells.  The  first  bar  to  its  inward  progress  is  the 
area  of  bast  fibers.  It  does  not  pass  through  these  at  once,  but  in  verj^ 
old  cankers  it  has  been  observed  even  in  the  bast  fibers.  There  is,  how- 
ever, an  eas3^  path  between  the  bast  areas  through  the  flaring  outer  ends 

of  the  medullary  rays,  which  do  not  stop  at 
the    cambium   but   extend    up   between  the 
phloem  areas.      From    here   the  hj^pha?  can 
easily  pass  laterally  into  the  phloem.     Pass- 
ing down  into  the  X3dem  elements  the  invader 
finds  its  progress  made   much  easier  bj'  the 
presence  of  pits  in  all  the  walls.     It  does  not 
confine  itself  to  the  medullary  rays,  but  passes 
Fig.  11.  — Mycelium  in  the      laterally  into  the  other  elements.    The  mj'- 
ceiis  of  the  medullary  rays.       celium  has  been  found   in   every  element  of 
the  xylem,  least  of  all,  however,  in  the  wood 
fibers.     Often  in  old  cankers  the  tracheae  may  be  found  almost  clogged 
with  mycelium,  frequently  in  the  form  of  chlamydospores.    The  method 
by  which  it  passes  through  the  walls  is  shown  in  Fig.  11.     From  the 
xylem  it  passes  down  into  the  pith,  where  it  finds  progress  easy  through 
the  thin  walls. 

Effect  on  the  Host  Cells.  —  All  of  the  cankers  do  not  extend  to  the  pith. 
A  great  many  of  them,  for  some  unexplained  reason,  never  go  deeper  than 
the  bark.  The  fact  that  the  affected  plants  stop  growing,  and  do  not 
send  up  any  more  shoots  from  below  the  cankers,  is  probably  due  to 
destruction  of  the  phloem,  which  prevents  any  food  passing  down  to 
the  lower  stem  or  roots.  The  cells  somewhat  in  advance  of  the  invading 
hypha;  first  become  filled  with  a  brown,  finely  granular  substance  which 
gradually  becomes  coarser  and  later  mostly  disappears,  possibly  being 
used  by  the  parasite,  and  the  cells  are  left  almost  empty.  The  starch, 
nuclei  and  chloroplasts  also  disappear.  The  walls  are  not  affected  except 
for  the  holes  through  which  the  hyphge  pass.  The  whole  effect  on  the 
host  seems  to  be  entire  disorganization  of  the  cell  contents.  There  is  no 
hyperplasia,  hypertrophy  or  other  abnormal  cell  change  in  the  canker. 
To  be  sure,  there  is  often  a  swelling  just  above  the  canker,  which  is  pro- 
duced by  an  increase  both  in  the  size  and  number  of  cells  of  the  inner 
cortex.  This  is,  however,  probably  due  to  the  amount  of  elaborated  food 
which  is  stopped  here  because  it  cannot  now  continue  downward  on  its 
normal  course.  As  the  canker  becomes  older,  the  cells  of  the  bark  col- 
lapse, being  now  empty.  The  cracks  which  then  appear  in  the  bark  may 
be  due  to  the  contraction  of  the  dying  tissue,  or  to  the  expansion  of  the 
growing  stem,  or  both.  The  cells  of  the  xylem  and  pith  do  not  collapse, 
but  the  affected  tissues  turn  brown. 


ROSE    CANKER   AND    ITS   CONTROL.  29 


Saprophytic  Life  of  the  Fungus. 

Early  in^this  investigation  it  was  discovered  that  the  canker  pathogene 
does  not  necessarily  live  all  the  time  on  the  rose  plant,  but  that  it  is  also 
a  natural  inhabitant  of  the  soil.  This  was  first  proved  by  isolating  it 
under  sterile  conditions  from  soil  4  and  5  inches  below  the  surface  in 
the  rose  beds.  Then  it  was  found  that  when  sterilized  soil  is  inoculated 
the  mycelium  spreads  rapidly  through  it  and  lives  and  grows  normally 
there  for  a  long  time.  Since  these  pure  cultures  in  soil  have  been  used 
rather  extensively  in  this  investigation,  the  method  of  making  them  is 
described  here  and  omitted  in  all  future  references. 

Method.  —  Milk  bottles  of  1  quart  capacity  were  used.  Thirty-three  cubic 
inches  of  rose  soil,  moisteued  until  muddy,  was  put  in  each  bottle.  The  mouth  of 
the  bottle  was  then  plugged  with  cotton  and  the  whole  sterilized  in  an  autoclave. 
After  it  was  cool  it  was  inoculated  by  transferring  a  small  bit  of  agar  containing 
mycelium  to  the  surface  of  the  soil.  Soil  so  treated  becomes  entirely  infested  in 
twelve  to  twenty-one  days  at  ordinary  room  temperature. 

Longevity  of  Mycelium  in  the  Soil. 
Before  undertaking  control  measures  it  was  very  essential  to  know 
whether  the  fungus  lives  indefinitely  in  the  soil,  or  whether  it  starves  out 
and  dies  when  the  rose  plant  is  not  present  to  furnish  nourishment.  On 
March  27,  1917,  eight  milk  bottles  of  soil  were  inoculated.  At  the  end  of 
every  month  clods  of  soil  were  transferred  from  these  bottles  to  acidified 
agar  plates.  It  has  been  found  that  when  soil  particles  containing  living 
mA'celium  are  transferred  to  agar  plates  the  mycelium  begins  to  grow  out 
on  to  the  agar  within  twenty-four  hours,  and  in  a  few  days  produces 
spores  by  which  it  can  be  definitely  identified.  The  soil  bottles  were 
kept  in  a  dry  culture  room.  No  water  was  added  to  them,  but  the  soil 
is  still  somewhat  moist  at  this  writing.  One  year  from  the  date  of  inocu- 
lation every  plate  isolation  gave  pure  cultures  of  Cylindrocladium.  There 
seems  to  be  no  doubt,  then,  that  it  will  live  for  a  year  at  least,  and  prob- 
ably indefinitely,  in  the  soil  without  the  rose  plant  being  present. 

Growth  on  Other  Substrata. 
The  longevity  of  the  mycelium  may  possibly  be  increased  by  passing 
a  part  of  its  existence  on  substrata  other  than  the  living  rose  plant  and 
the  soil.  The  abundant  growth  and  production  of  spores  on  dead  and 
decaying  rose  twigs  on  the  soil  has  previously  been  referred  to.  Dead 
rose  leaves  were  sterilized  and  inoculated  with  spores  in  moist  chambers, 
and  it  was  found  that  the  mycelium  grows  luxuriantly  and  produces  some 
spores  on  them.  Pods  of  the  honey  locust  and  leaves  of  the  papaw 
tree  —  substrata  on  which  the  fungus  was  previously  reported  —  were 
inoculated  in  the  same  way.  The  fungus  grew  normally  on  both,  produc- 
ing spores  in  great  abundance  on  the  pods,  and  less  abundantly  on  the 
leaves.    The  great  variety  of  artificial  media  on  which  it  can  be  made  to 


30         MASS.  EXPERIMENT    STATION   BULLETIN    183. 

grow  in  the  laboratory  also  indicates  a  wide  range  in  feeding  habits. 
Other  kinds  of  decaying  vegetable  matter  in  the  soil  were  not  tried,  but 
it  would  not  be  surprising  if  it  were  found  capable  of  hving  on  a  great 
number  of  them. 

Depth  of  Penetration  of  the  Soil. 
In  the  soil  isolation  tests  the  fungus  was  not  found  below  5  inches,  but 
this  was  not  conclusive,  since  the  method  of  isolation  proved  not  to  be 
entirely  satisfactory,  and  only  a  few  isolations  were  made.  The  soil  in 
the  milk  bottles  was  never  more  than  4  inches  deep,  but  the  fungus  grew 
as  luxuriantly  at  that  depth  as  at  the  surface  of  the  ground.  In  order 
to  test  its  ability  to  penetrate  to  greater  depth,  glazed  drain  tiles  2  feet 
long  were  closed  at  the  bottom  with  an  inch  of  cement,  filled  with  soil, 
plugged  with  cotton  at  the  top  and  sterilized.  The  soil  was  then  inocu- 
lated on  the  surface.  Holes  had  been  drilled  at  regular  intervals  through 
the  side  of  the  tiles.  These  were  corked,  and  after  the  whole  was  steri- 
lized the  corks  were  made  air-tight  and  water-tight  by  covering  them 
with  melted  paraffin.  In  order  to  determine  whether  the  fungus  had 
penetrated  to  a  certain  depth  a  cork  at  that  depth  was  removed,  a  portion 
of  the  soil  next  to  it  transferred  to  an  agar  plate,  and  the  hole  immedi- 
ately made  tight  again,  all  operations  being  carried  out  under  aseptic 
conditions.  Unfortunately  the  soil  became  dry  too  quickly,  due  to  the 
large  opening  at  the  top,  and  it  was  found  necessary  to  pour  more  water 
on  to  the  top  of  the  soil.  At  this  writing  the  fungus  is  growing  through- 
out the  entire  depth  of  soil  in  the  tiles,  and  has  been  isolated  from  the 
lowest  holes,  almost  2  feet  below  the  surface.  Whether  it  was  washed 
down  by  the  water  or  grew  down  naturally  is  not  certain,  but  at  present 
the  fungus  is  growing  normally  in  every  particle  of  soil  2  feet  below  the 
surface.  If  it  could  be  washed  down  by  the  water  in  the  tiles,  there  is 
no  reason  why  it  should  not  be  washed  down  by  water  in  the  rose  houses. 
Judging  from  these  results,  and  what  is  known  about  the  penetration  of 
other  soil  fungi,  there  seems  to  be  no  reason  for  doubting  that  the  myce- 
lium may  exist  several  feet  below  the  surface,  depending  to  some  extent 
on  the  character  of  the  soil. 

Rate  of  Grouih  of  the  Mycelium. 
The  rapidity  with  which  mycelium  grows  through  soil  is  dependent 
on  the  temperature.  The  optimum,  maximum  and  minimum  tempera- 
tures for  growth  were  determined  for  the  purpose  of  finding  which  tem- 
peratures in  the  greenhouse  are  favorable  and  which  unfavorable  to 
the  spread  of  the  fungus. 

Method.  —  When  the  milk  bottles  of  infested  soil  are  kept  in  a  dark  place  the 
progress  of  the  white  mycelium  downward  can  be  readily  observed  through  the 
sides  of  the  bottles.  A  number  of  bottles  were  inoculated,  and  when  the  mycelium 
was  well  started  downward  the  limit  was  marked  accurately  by  blue  pencil  lines 
around  the  bottles.     The  bottles  were  then  placed  simultaneously  in  incubators, 


ROSE  CANKER  AND  ITS  CONTROL. 


31 


ice  boxes  and  constant  temperature  rooms,  wherever  a  constant  temperature  could 
be  maintained  for  a  week  at  a  time.  A  new  line  was  drawn  at  the  end  of  every 
forty-eight  hours. 

The  results  of  this  test  are  tabulated  in  Table  III.  An  examination 
of  this  table  shows  that  the  optimum  temperature  for  growth  is  26  to 
27°  C,  the  minimum  is  just  above  8.5°,  and  the  maximum  between  30° 
and  32°.  At  the  optimum,  the  mycelium  grows  at  a  rate  of  approxi- 
mately three-fourths  of  a  centimeter  per  day;  in  other  words,  it  requires 
about  forty  days  for  the  mycelium  to  grow  through  1  foot  of  soil.  The 
results  ofTer  little  hope  of  maintaining  in  the  greenhouse  a  temperature 
very  unfavorable  to  the  growth  of  the  fungus. 

Table  III.  —  Effect  of  Temperature  VariatioJi  on  Rate  of  Mycelial  Growth 

in  Soil. 


Temperature,  Centigrade  (Degrees). 


Number  of 
Measurements. 


Daily  Growth 
in  Centimeters. 


5, 

8.5, 

14, 

16, 

21-22, 

23-25, 

25, 

25-26, 

25.5-26.5 

26-27, 

30, 

32-3o, 

37.5, 


10 

10 

20 

150 

170 

170 

130 

90 

30 

25 

40 

30 

10 


Effect  of  freezing  the  Mycelium . 
It  is  very  important  to  know  whether  soil  can  safely  be  used  in  the 
benches  after  being  frozen  out  of  doors.    The  following  tests  were  made 
to  determine  this  point :  — 

Method.  —  Eight  bottles,  each  containing  33  cubic  inches  of  soil,  were  plugged, 
sterilized  and  inoculated  with  Cylindrocladium.  After  seven  months  the  soil  was 
thoroughly  infested  with  the  fungus,  and  probably  contained  all  modifications 
of  the  mycelium  which  ever  occur  in  the  soil.  Transfers  were  made  and  the  fungus 
in  all  found  to  be  alive.  Thap,  before  the  ground  froze  in  November,  four  of  the 
bottles  were  exposed  outside,  one  on  top  of  the  ground,  one  just  under  the  surface, 
one  6  inches  down,  and  one  a  foot  below  the  surface.  The  other  four  were  kept  in 
the  laboratory  for  controls.  Some  of  these  bottles  were  brought  in  each  month  of 
the  winter  to  see  whether  the  fungus  was  still  alive. 


32  MASS,   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    183. 

The  last  test  was  made  May  10,  after  the  bottles  had  experienced  the 
coldest  winter  on  record  in  jSIassachusetts.  The  fungus  was  still  living 
in  the  soil.  Apparently,  then,  soil  cannot  be  made  safe  by  exposing  it 
during  the  winter  out  of  doors. 

Thermal  Death  Point  of  Mycelmm. 
Anticipating  soil  sterilization  by  heat,  the  thermal  death  point  for 
the  mycelium  was  determined. 

Method.  —  The  same  method  was  used  as  for  determination  of  the  thermal 
death  point  of  spores,  except  that  bits  of  agar  containing  mycelium  were  inserted 
into  the  sealed  tubes,  and  after  exposure  for  ten  minutes  to  the  desired  temperature 
were  transferred  to  sterile  agar  plates.  If  the  mycelium  was  still  alive  it  quickly 
began  to  spread  to  the  agar.  Temperatures  between  42°  and  55°  C  at  intervals  of 
1°  were  tested. 

Up  to  and  including  48°  the  treatment  seemed  to  have  no  effect  on  the 
mycelium.  At  49°  it  was  sometimes  killed  and  sometimes  not.  It  never 
grew  after  ten  minutes'  exposure  to  50°.  We  may  therefore  consider  50° 
the  thermal  death  point.  It  will  be  noticed  that  the  thermal  death  points 
of  mycelium  and  spores  differ  by  only  1  degree.  The  mycelium  tested 
contained,  besides  the  ordinary  white  mycelium,  also  the  dark  bodies 
with  thick  walls  which  we  have  called  chlamydospores  and  sclerotia. 
As  was  the  case  with  spores,  so  also  the  mycelium  may  be  killed  by  a 
longer  exposure  to  a  lower  temperature.  Based  on  an  exposure  during 
one  hour,  the  thermal  death  point  was  found  to  be  48°. 

DISSEMINATION. 

In  deciding  on  a  method  of  controlling  a  disease  it  is  of  prime  impor- 
tance to  find  out  how  the  pathogene  is  spread  about,  where  it  comes 
from,  how  it  reaches  the  host.  In  the  present  case  a  threefold  question 
is  involved:  (1)  How  did  the  fungus  get  into  rose  houses  in  the  first 
place?  (2)  How  is  it  spread  from  the  houses  of  one  rose  grower  to  those 
of  another?  (3)  On  the  premises  of  a  single  grower,  how  does  it  pass 
from  house  to  house,  bench  to  bench,  or  plant  to  plant?  In  the  light 
of  what  has  been  learned  concerning  the  life  history  and  habits  of  the 
pathogene,  we  may  undertake  to  answer  these  three  questions. 

1.    Original  Source  of  the  Pathogene. 

The  fungus,  from  all  that  is  known  of  its  past  history,  is  a  native  of 
America.  Since  it  has  been  reported  but  a  few  times,  it  probably  is  not 
very  common  out  of  doors.  As  greenhouse  roses  are  grown  in  the  section 
of  the  country  where  it  has  been  reported,  it  would  not  be  far-fetched 
to  imagine  the  fungus  being  carried  into  rose  houses  with  rotted  leaves, 
where  it  was  able  to  adapt  itself  to  parasitic  life  on  the  rose.  It  is  not 
necessary  to  assume,  then,  that  this  is  an  imported  pathogene.    Early 


ROSE    CANKER   AND    ITS    CONTROL.  33 

in  the  course  of  the  investigation  it  was  suspected  that  it  might  have 
been  brought  over  from  Europe  on  Manetti  stocks,  which  are  used  almost 
exchisively  by  rose  growers  for  gi-afting.  The  Manetti  is  moderately 
susceptible  to  the  disease,  as  may  be  readily  determined  by  examination 
of  Manetti  shoots  coming  from  below  the  graft  in  a  badly  diseased  house. 
Pure  cultures  have  frequently  been  made  from  these  shoots.  Massey 
(1917)  also  made  infection  experiments  and  found  Manetti  roses  suscepti- 
ble. In  the  course  of  these  investigations  hundreds  of  Manetti  stocks 
from  Scotland  were  examined  for  lesions,  numerous  tissue  plants  were 
made,  hundreds  more  were  kept  in  moist  chambers  to  bring  out  the 
fungus,  and  thousands  of  them  watched  carefully  for  a  year  after  being 
planted  in  sterilized  soil  in  order  to  see  whether  the  disease  developed. 
All  results  were  negative,  and  up  to  the  present  we  have  no  reason  to 
suspect  that  the  fungus  is  being  imported  on  Manetti  stock.  It  would 
be  very  helpful  if  we  knew  how  widely  the  fungus  is  distributed  over 
this  country  in  its  natural  state,  and  whether  it  is  being  carried  into  the 
houses  again  and  again.  Various  investigators  have  worked  on  the 
fungous  flora  of  the  soil  and  published  lists  of  species  isolated,  but  none 
of  them  mentions  Cylindrocladium.  This  may  indicate  that  it  is  only 
local  in  its  distribution,  or  may  be  due  merely  to  difficulties  of  isolating 
it.  There  seems  to  be  little  doubt  that  it  infests  the  soil  about  rose 
houses  where  the  disease  occurs  and  where  infested  soil  has  been  dumped 
out. 

2.    Spread  from  One  Grower  to  Another. 

Plants  are  continually  being  sent  from  one  grower  to  another.  Small 
cankers  on  these  would  be  overlooked  even  if  the  sender  was  familiar 
with  the  disease.  Not  only  could  the  mycelium  be  sent  in  the  plant 
itself,  but  particles  of  soil  adhering  to  the  plants  could  easily  carry  it. 
It  has  been  proved  by  laboratory  tests  that  infested  particles  of  soil 
may  be  kept  dry  for  at  least  three  months,  and  probably  longer,  without 
killing  the  mycelium.  The  disease  may  be  spread  in  other  ways,  but 
this  one  would  be  sufficient  to  account  for  the  present  known  distribution. 

3.    Local  Dissemination. 

There  are  a  number  of  ways  in  which  the  fungus  spreads  from  one 
part  of  a  house  to  another,  or  from  one  plant  to  another,  (a)  It  may 
grow  for  long  distances  through  the  soil  and  enter  the  plant  below  the 
surface  of  the  soil.  That  infection  can  take  place  in  this  way  has  been 
repeatedly  proved  by  setting  clean  plants  in  infested  soil  and  thus  pro- 
ducing the  disease  on  them.  (6)  If  the  fungus  is  in  the  potting  soil  it  would 
be  effectually  distributed  in  the  beds  when  the  plants  were  transplanted 
to  them,  (c)  Where  "own-root"  plants  are  grown  the  soil  in  the  cutting 
bench  maj^  be  infested,  and  the  disease  is  then  carried  with  the  cuttings 
when  they  are  planted  in  the  benches,  (d)  It  is  easily  carried  from  one 
part  of  the  house  to  another  on  tools,  clothes  and  shoes  of  workmen. 


34  MASS.   EXPERIMENT    STATION    BULLETIN    183. 

(e)  Insects,  centipedes  and  worms  carry  the  spores,  as  has  been  proved 
in  the  laboratory  by  permitting  them  to  pass  over  sterile  plates  after 
being  on  dead  twigs  bearing  spores.  (/)  The  water  used  in  watering  the 
plants  is  usually  driven  from  the  nozzle  with  enough  force  to  splash  spores 
and  bits  of  mj^celium  from  the  soil  or  debris  on  the  ground  up  to  the 
stems.  Probably  most  of  the  stomatal  infections  above  ground  are 
started  in  this  way. 

The  spores  of  many  fungi  are  so  light  that  they  float  around  in  the 
air  and  are  wafted  about  by  very  light  air  currents.  It  does  not  seem 
likely  that  the  spores  of  Cylindrocladium  are  carried  about  to  any  great 
extent  in  this  way.  They  are  bound  together  in  solid  heads  of  spores, 
which  are  probably  too  heavy  for  currents  of  air  such  as  usually  occur 
in  rose  houses.  That  they  can  be  dislodged  and  blown  some  distance 
by  strong  air  currents  was  proved  in  the  laboratory  by  passing  a  strong 
current  of  air  from  a  fan  over  spores  growing  on  a  dead  rose  stem,  and 
exposing  agar  plates  1,  2  and  3  feet  away.  Colonies  of  the  fungus  devel- 
oped on  all  of  them,  but  it  is  hardly  probal^le  that  so  strong  an  air  current 
would  normall}^  occur  in  rose  houses.  They  could  also  be  blown  about 
on  dust  particles,  but  the  soil  in  rose  houses  is  rarely  permitted  to  become 
dry  enough  to  form  dust. 

OCCURRENCE    OF    TWO    SPECIES    OF    CYLINDROCLADIUM 

ON  ROSES. 

During  these  investigations  a  second  species  of  Cylindrocladium  has 
frequently  been  isolated.  It  was  first  taken  from  the  roots  of  a  plant 
which  had  typical  cankers  on  the  crown.  Later  it  was  secured  a  number 
of  times  from  crowns  and  from  dead  areas  of  the  plant  above  the  ground. 
It  was  commonly  isolated  directly  from  the  soil  in  the  rose  beds,  from 
the  surface  to  S  inches  down.  Except  for  its  size,  it  resembles  C.  scoparium 
so  closely  that  the  writer  was  at  first  inclined  to  consider  it  but  a  dwarf 
variety  of  that  species.  The  spores  are  only  about  one-third  as  large 
as  those  of  C.  scoparium.  Although  numerous  isolations  have  been 
made,  no  transition  forms  between  the  two  have  been  found.  The  small 
form  has  been  grown  through  many  generations  in  culture,  and  has 
remained  constant  on  all  media. 

Infection  experiments  were  carried  out,  but  all  attempts  to  produce 
the  disease  by  the  same  inoculation  methods  as  were  used  for  the  larger 
form  gave  only  negative  results.  The  fungus  grows  and  produces  spores 
on  the  dead  tissue  about  wounds  and  on  cut  stubs,  but  seems  to  lack 
ability  to  spread  to  healthy  tissue.  The  small  form  then  appears  to  be  a 
saprophyte,  while  the  larger  one  is  a  parasite. 

In  order  to  determine  whether  there  are  cultural  differences  by  which 
they  could  easily  be  distinguished,  the  two  forms  were  grown  simul- 
taneously on  five  standard  culture  media.  They  show  very  marked 
diagnostic  differences.     Such  differences  in  morphology,  pathogenicity 


ROSE  CANKER  AND  ITS  CONTROL. 


35 


and  cultural  characters  are  certainly  marked  enough  to  be  considered 
specific  rather  than  varietal.  Since  no  species  of  Cylindrocladium  other 
than  C.  scoparium  has  been  described,  a  new  name,  Cylhidrocladium 
parnnn,  is  proposed  for  this  small  form. 

The  morphological  differences  and  the  cultural  characters  and  differ- 
ences of  the  two  species  are  given  in  parallel  columns  below. 

Morphological  Characters. 

Since  some  morphological  characters  vary  somewhat  with  the  condi- 
tions under  which  they  are  grown,  all  measurements  given  below  were 
taken  from  potato  agar  plates  grown  sinmltaneously  under  the  same 
conditions,  and  each  is  the  average  of  fifty  measurements. 


C.  scoparium. 
Size  of  spores,  48.8  x  5.1  f^. 
Height  of  conidiophore,  291  fi. 
Diameter  of  conidiophore  stalk,  6.6  /^. 


C.  parvum. 
Size  of  spores,  16.8  x  2.5  /u. 
Height  of  conidiophore,  130  fi. 
Diameter  of  conidiophore  stalk,  4.25  /^. 


Cultural  Characters. 

Most  soil  fungi  can  easily  be  grown  on  a  great  variety  of  artificial 
media.  The  characters  of  the  colony  differ  markedly  with  the  medium 
used,  and  very  frequently  species  of  fungi,  like  bacteria,  can  be  distin- 
guished more  easily  by  macroscopic  cultural  characters  than  by  micro- 
scopic morphological  characters.  Obviously,  to  grow  each  fungus  on 
all  the  possible  media,  or  even  a  great  number  of  them,  would  be  almost 
an  endless  task.  Five  common  media,  all  easy  of  preparation,  have  there- 
fore been  adopted  by  the  writer  as  standard  for  all  diagnostic  work. 
These  five  are  (1)  potato  agar  (ace.  Thom.  Bui.  82  U.  S.  D.  A.,  Bureau 
of  An.  Industry);  (2)  sugar  potato  agar  (the  same  as  the  potato  agar 
except  for  addition  of  3  per  cent,  of  cane  sugar);  (3)  gelatin  (150  grams 
gold  label  to  a  liter  of  water);  (4)  sugar  gelatin  (same  as  above  with 
addition  of  3  per  cent,  of  cane  sugar) ;  (5)  Czapek's  synthetic  agar  (ace. 
Waksman  in  Soil  Sc.  2:  113).  Petri  dishes,  each  with  a  single  colony 
started  at  the  center,  were  used.  They  were  kept  in  the  diffused  light  of 
the  laboratory  at  the  ordinary  laboratory  temperature. 

Every  reference  to  a  color  in  the  description  below  refers  to  the  color 
given  under  that  name  in  Ridgway's  "Color  Standards  and  Nomencla- 
ture," 1912.  Color  "in  reverse"  in  these  descriptions  refers  to  the  color 
of  the  colony  when  examined  from  the  bottom  of  the  dish.  This  color 
may  be  due  to  (1)  a  pigment  in  the  medium  itself  (extra-cellular),  (2) 
intracellular  pigments  {i.e.,  the  natural  color  of  the  mycelium),  or  (3) 
very  frequently  it  is  due  to  a  combination  of  the  two.  Sometimes  a  dis- 
tinction is  made  between  them,  but  for  diagnostic  work  such  a  distinction 
usually  adds  difficulty  instead  of  simplifying  determination.  Most 
emphasis  is  placed  on  those  characters  which  appear  within  the  first 


36 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    183. 


week  after  the  colony  is  made.  If  one  has  to  wait  two  or  three  weeks  or 
longer  for  a  character  to  appear,  the  long  waiting  makes  diagnosis  tedious, 
and  one  of  the  principal  purposes  of  this  method  of  diagnosis  is  defeated. 
The  more  important  characters  for  distinguishing  these  two  species  are 
italicized.    Many  minor  distinguishing  characters  are  not  mentioned. 


Potato  Agar. 


C.  scoparium. 
Growth  only  moderately  good. 
Starts  with  abundant,  perfectly  white, 
raised,  aerial  mycelium,  but  soon  falls 
flat  at  the  center,  which  becomes  cov- 
ered with  spores  after  two  or  three 
days.  Always  more  or  less  aerial 
mycelium  out  toward  the  margin,  which 
is  rather  coarse  and  tow-like.  Not  a 
decided  color  in  reverse  during  the  first 
week,  but  a  dilute  cream  color  to  buff. 
At  the  end  of  the  second  week  it  turns 
to  avellaneous  or  wood  brown,  and 
after  three  weeks  still  darker,  Rood's 
brown.  Margin  of  colony  crenulafe  or 
wavy. 


C.  parvum. 
Only  moderately  good  growth.  My- 
celium finer  and  denser  than  C.  sco- 
parium, perfectly  white.  Spores  pro- 
duced in  great  abundance.  The  edge 
entirely  throughout  its  growth  remains 
very  even  and  forms  a  perfectly  round 
colony.  Practically  no  color  —  possibly 
a  very  faint  buff  —  develops  in  reverse 
even  after  three  weeks'  growth. 


Sugar  Potato  Ag.^r. 


C.  scoparium. 
Very  rank  growth,  abundance  of 
spores,  entire  plate  covered  in  two 
weeks.  Dense  opaque  color  appears  in 
reverse  after  three  days;  vinaceous 
purple  to  hcematite  red  at  the  edge,  dark- 
ening to  russet  or  chocolate  at  the  center. 
At  the  end  of  a  week  a  large  central  area 
appears  almost  black,  but  examined  more 
closely  shows  various  shades  of  reddish 
brown,  chestnut  and  bay.  Entire  reverse 
opaque  after  two  weeks.  The  brown 
color  is  due  to  the  extremely  abundant 
production  of  sclerotia  and  chlamy- 
dospores  on  this  agar. 


C.  parvum. 
Rank,  white  growth  of  a  very  much 
finer  texture  than  C.  scoparium.  Abun- 
dant production  of  spores.  Color  in 
reverse,  ivhite,  or  at  most,  only  cream 
color  at  end  of  one  week.  This  is  one  of 
the  best  diagnostic  characters.  At  the 
end  of  two  weeks  it  has  passed  through 
gray  and  drab  gray  to  a  clear  wood 
brown,  with  minute  patches  of  army 
brown  here  and  there  which  show 
chlamydospores  under  microscope.  The 
red-brown  colors  of  C.  scoparium  never 
appear. 


Gelatin. 


C.  scoparium, 
very   poor,    consisting 


Growth  very  poor,  consisting  of  a 
thin  covering  of  coarse  radiating  hj-phae. 
Very  few  spores.  Stops  growing  after 
about  ten  days.  Gelatin  turned  to  a 
watery  liquid  which  at  the  end  of  a 
week  is  orange  rufous,  but  gradually 
turns  darker  to  Sanford's  brown.  Lique- 
faction extends  some  distance  beyond 
the  margin  of  the  colony. 


C.  parvum. 
very    scanty, 


Growth  very  scanty,  so  much  so 
that  it  is  necessary  to  look  at  the  plate 
against  a  black  background  to  see  it 
at  all  during  first  week.  Gelatin  lique- 
fied. No  color  at  first,  but  becomes 
dilute  old  gold  by  end  of  second  week. 
This  medium  is  hardly  suitable  for  dis- 
tinguishing the  two. 


ROSE    CANKER   AND    ITS    CONTROL. 


37 


Sugar  Gelatin. 


C.  scoparium. 
Rank  growth  of  coarse  radiating 
aerial  mj-celium,  but  few  spores.  Gela- 
tin liquefied.  After  about  four  days  a 
striking  brilliant  carmine  color  begins 
to  appear  in  reverse,  due  to  a  pigment  in 
the  gelatin.  This  gradually  spreads  to 
the  whole  plate  and  becomes  darker,  an 
ox-blood  red.  This  is  probably  the  best 
diagnostic  cultural  character  for  this 
species.  The  mycelium  covers  the 
plate  in  ten  days. 


C.  parvum. 
Fine  tangled  aerial  mycelium  and 
more  abundant  spore  production  than 
for  C.  scoparium.  Gelatin  liquefied. 
Covers  entire  plate  in  two  weeks.  At 
the  end  of  a  week  the  colonies  vary  from 
Mars  yellow  to  raw  sienna  in  reverse, 
and  at  the  end  of  two  weeks  have  darkened 
to  amber  brown  and  Mars  yellow.  The 
color  during  the  entire  development  of 
the  colony  is  in  strong  contrast  to  the 
carmine  and  ox-blood  of  C.  scoparium. 


Czapek's  Agar. 


C.  scoparium. 
Growth  moderately  good,  aerial 
mycelium  thin.  Spores  abundant.  At 
the  end  of  a  week  the  colors  in  reverse 
are  much  the  same  as  for  potato  agar,  — 
claret  brown,  russet  or  amber,  with  a 
brick-red  color  suffused  through  it.  At 
the  end  of  two  weeks  the  center  is  prac- 
tically black,  fading  through  broivn  and 
red  tints  toward  the  margin.  The  red 
color  is  due  to  a  pigment  in  the  me- 
dium; the  brown,  to  the  chlamydo- 
spores  and  sclerotia.    Irregular  edge. 


C.  parvum,. 
Finer  and  denser  aerial  growth  of 
mycelium.  During  the  first  week  the 
reverse  remains  pearly  white;  later  it 
changes  to  dilute  wood  brown,  then  Rood's 
brown  and  at  the  end  of  two  weeks  ap- 
proaches Natal  brown.  None  of  the 
red  tints  of  C.  scoparium  ever  appear. 
Margin  much  more  even  than  that  of 
C.  scoparium.  Abundant  production 
of  spores  in  distinct  concentric  zones. 


Latin  Description  of  Cylindrocladium  parvum. 

Cylindrocladium  parvum  n.  sp.  Album  effusum;  conidiophoris 
erectis,  base  simplicibus,  apice  ternate  vel  dichotomice  ramosis,  130  x  4-^5fj-; 
conidiis  cylindraciis,  medio  obscure  1-septatis,  hyalinis,  16.8  x  2.5/^. 

Hab.  in  caulibus  emortuis  et  radicibus  rosarum  et  in  humo,  Massachu- 
setts in  A^ner.  bor.  —  Simile  C.  scopario. 


CONTROL. 

Every  method  used  in  the  control  of  an}'  fungous  disease  is  an  appli- 
cation of  one  of  four  principles:  (1)  exclusion  of  the  fungus,  (2)  eradica- 
tion of  the  fungus,  (3)  protection  of  the  host,  or  (4)  immunization  of  the 
host.  Although  practically  all  the  work  of  the  present  investigation 
has  been  on  the  second  of  these  principles,  there  are  possibilities  of  using 
all  four  of  them  in  the  control  of  rose  canker.  These  four  are  first  con- 
sidered separately  below  in  the  order  named,  and  finally  a  general  scheme 
of  treatment  is  recommended. 


38  MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    183. 


Exclusion  of  the  Pathogexe. 

By  exclusion  we  mean  preventing  a  fungus  from  entering  a  given 
territory  in  the  first  place,  whether  this  territory  be  a  country,  a  State, 
a  region  or  only  one  rose  house.  Since  this  disease  seems  to  be  pretty 
generally  distributed  over  the  country  already  it  is  obviously  impossible 
to  exclude  it  from  the  United  States,  and  probably  from  any  particular 
State  or  section.  But  it  is  entirely  possible  to  exclude  it  from  the  house 
of  a  rose  grower  who  finds  that  none  of  his  plants  are  already  affected, 
or  where  new  houses  are  being  erected  at  some  distance  from  old  ones. 
The  whole  practice,  then,  consists  of  taking  every  possible  precaution 
against  carrying  any  diseased  stocks,  cuttings  or  infested  soil  into  the 
house.  Every  plant  brought  in  should  be  carefully  examined,  and,  if 
there  are  any  suspicious  cankers  in  the  bark,  it  should  be  discarded.  All 
new  plants  and  cuttings  should  be  taken  whenever  possible  only  from 
houses  known  to  be  free  from  the  disease. 


Eradication  of  the  Pathogene. 

By  eradication  we  mean  the  absolute  destruction  or  removal  of  the 
fungus  from  the  rose  beds  or  from  the  whole  house,  so  that  it  is  no  longer 
present  in  the  plants  or  in  the  soil,  pots,  debris,  manure  or  anywhere 
else  from  which  it  can  return  to  the  plants.  The  practice  of  this  method 
is  of  course  necessary  only  when  it  has  been  impossible  to  exclude  the 
pathogene  and  it  has  become  established  in  the  house.  Up  to  the  present 
this  has  proved  to  be  the  most  successful  principle  applied  to  controlling 
canker. 

The  ultimate  aim  is  to  eradicate  the  fungus  from  the  plant  itself,  but 
the  application  of  direct  methods,  such  as  excision  of  cankers,  pruning 
of?  of  dead  parts,  or  even  absolute  destruction  of  entire  plants  when 
cankers  are  found  on  them,  is  altogether  useless  because  the  soil  all  about 
the  plants  is  infested.  From  the  soil  the  fungus  can  grow  back  into 
the  roses  as  fast  as  it  can  be  cut  out.  Spraying  or  dusting  is  of  course 
useless,  also,  because  no  fungicide  can  reach  the  mycelium  in  the  inner 
tissues  of  the  plant;  and  also  it  is  not  possible  to  cover  the  parts  of  the 
plant  below  the  surface  of  the  ground  where  infection  commonly  occurs. 
Obviously,  then,  eradication  resolves  itself  into  destruction  of  the  path- 
ogene in  the  soil;  in  other  words,  soil  disinfection.  Of  the  various  methods 
of  disinfecting  soil  only  two  have  appeared  to  be  at  all  practicable:  (1) 
by  heat,  and  (2)  application  of  chemicals.  Freezing,  as  previously  men- 
tioned, is  not  effective.  Desiccation  would  take  entirely  too  long.  Other 
methods  are  either  too  expensive  or  too  difficult  of  application.  In  the 
course  of  the  present  investigation  both  heat  and  chemicals  have  been 
successfully  used. 


ROSE  CANKER  AND  ITS  CONTROL.         39 


Disinfection  by  Chemicals.  Laboratory  Tests. 
Some  of  the  chemicals  which  have  been  used  in  the  past  for  disin- 
fecting soil  for  the  control  of  other  fungous  diseases  are  formaldehyde, 
sulfuric  acid,  copper  sulfate,  sulfur,  lime-sulfur.  The  results  obtained 
by  the  use  of  these  same  chemicals  for  other  fungi  could  not  be  used 
directly  in  the  present  investigation  because  every  fungus .  differs  in  its 
resistance  to  a  given  chemical.  It  was  first  necessary  to  determine  what 
concentration  and  what  quantity  of  solution  per  cubic  foot  was  needed 
to  kill  the  fungus.  These  facts  could  be  determined  more  accurately 
and  conveniently  in  the  laboratory  than  in  the  greenhouse.  The  method 
used  in  all  these  tests  was  as  follows :  — 

Method.  —  Milk  bottles,  each  containing  33  cubic  inches  of  soil,  were  steam 
sterilized  and  inoculated  from  pure  cultures  of  the  fungus.  When  the  soil  was 
entirely  infested  (requiring  from  twelve  days  to  three  weeks)  it  was  stirred  into 
a  loose  condition  with  a  sterile  glass  rod,  and  the  proper  amount  of  chemical  in 
solution,  at  the  strength  to  be  tested,  poured  in  under  aseptic  conditions.  Since 
the  soil  did  not  dry  out  as  rapidly  in  these  bottles  as  it  would  under  natural  con- 
ditions in  the  greenhouse,  it  was  emptied  into  sterilized  porous  flowerpots  after  a 
few  hours.  It  was  found  after  several  trials  that  the  pots  dried  out  too  rapidly 
if  left  in  the  open  laboratory.  Thereafter  they  were  covered  with  bell  jars  which 
were  tilted  enough  to  allow  free  circulation  of  air  beneath  them,  and  the  length  of 
the  drying  process  could  then  be  regulated.  After  eight  to  ten  days  in  the  pots, 
clods  of  the  soil  were  transferred  from  various  portions  of  the  pots  to  sterile  agar 
plates.  If  the  fungus  was  still  alive  it  spread  to  the  agar;  otherwise  there  was* no 
growth  whatever  from  the  clods.  At  first,  the  solutions  were  applied  at  the  rate  of 
1  gallon  to  the  cubic  foot  of  earth.  Afterwards,  2  gallons  per  cubic  foot  were  used. 
When  dry  chemicals,  such  as  sulfur,  were  tested  the  required  amount  was  thor- 
oughly stirred  into  the  infested  soil  of  the  bottles  with  a  sterile  rod  and  no  water 
added. 


Formaldehyde.  —  First  tests  were  at  the  rate  of  1  gallon  per  cubic  foot 
at  the  following  concentrations:  1-500  (1  part  of  commercial  formalde- 
hyde to  500  parts  of  water),  1-400,  1-300,  1-200  and  1-100.  None  of 
these  concentrations  gave  complete  success.  On  the  transfers  from  the 
last  two,  however,  only  a  few  of  the  clods  contained  living  mycelium. 
This  indicated  a  lack  of  complete  penetration  by  the  solution.  In  the 
next  series  of  tests  the  same  concentrations  at  the  rate  of  2  gallons  per 
cubic  foot  were  used.  The  1-100  and  1-200  then  gave  absolute  control, 
while  the  1-300  usually  did;  but  occasionally  a  single  clod  developed  a 
mj'celium  on  the  agar.  The  death  point  concentration  lies  somewhere 
between  1-200  and  1-300.  But  to  be  well  within  the  margin  of  safety, 
1-200  (1  pint  of  commercial  formaldehj^de  solution  to  25  gallons  of  water) 
was  decided  upon  as  the  best  strength  to  use  in  the  greenhouse. 

Sidfiiric  Acid.  —  This  chemical  has  been  successfully  used  in  the  past 
in  the  control,  particularly,  of  certain  root  diseases  of  nursery  trees.  At 
the  rate  of  2  gallons  per  cubic  foot,  concentrations  of  1,  2,  3,  4,  5  and  8 
per  cent,  were  used.    The  5  per  cent,  solution  killed  most  of  the  mj^celium. 


40         MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    183. 

but  not  all  of  it.  The  8  per  cent,  killed  all  of  it.  The  death  point  con- 
centration lies  between  5  and  8  per  cent.,  but  such  a  high  concentration 
is  hardly  practicable  in  the  rose  house,  and  the  exact  point  was  not  de- 
termined. 

Copper  Sulfate.  —  Concentrations  of  1,  2,  3,  4,  5  and  10  per  cent,  were 
used  at  the  rate  of  2  gallons  per  cubic  foot.  The  5  per  cent,  seemed 
hardly  to  check  the  fungus,  but  10  per  cent,  proved  entirely  effective. 
Such  a  high  concentration  seemed  prohibitive  for  application  to  soil,  and 
no  more  accurate  determination  was  made. 

Lime-sulfur.  —  This  mixture  proved  to  be  worthless,  even  when  applied 
at  a  concentration  of  1  part  of  commercial  product  (32°  Baume)  to  10 
gallons  of  water,  and  at  the  rate  of  2  gallons  per  cubic  foot. 

Dry  Sulfur.  —  Finely  ground  suKur  flour  was  added  to  the  soil  and 
thoroughly  stirred  in.  First,  10  grams  per  bottle  were  used,  and  when 
that  proved  to  be  ineffective  10  grams  more  were  added,  etc.  All  results 
were  negative,  even  up  to  the  rate  of  7  pounds  of  sulfur  to  a  cubic  foot 
of  soil.  This  test  was  performed  at  a  laboratory  temperature  of  19°  to 
24°  C.  Perhaps  if  higher  temperatures  had  been  used  the  sulfur  would 
have  been  more  effective.  Dry  sulfur  seems  to  be  worthless  at  the  tem- 
peratures tested. 

Soot.  —  There  is  an  idea  prevalent  among  florists  that  soot  has  fungi- 
cidal value,  but  plant  pathologists  seem  never  to  have  made  any  extensive 
experiments  with  it.  The  same  method  and  rates  as  for  dry  sulfur  were 
tried.  At  the  rate  of  4  pounds  per  cubic  foot  soot  did  not  kill  the  fungus, 
but  at  the  rate  of  7  pounds  no  growth  of  the  pathogene  occurred. 

Of  all  the  chemicals  tried,  formaldehyde  seemed  to  be  the  only  one 
which  would  give  control  at  concentrations  which  could  safely  be  used 
on  the  soil. 

Greenhouse  Tests  with  Formaldehyde. 
The  greenhouse  tests  on  the  use  of  formaldehyde  were  begun  before 
the  laboratory  tests  were  completed,  and  at  a  time  when  it  appeared 
that  a  concentration  weaker  than  1  pint  to  25  gallons  would  be  sufficient. 
As  a  result,  the  tests  on  a  large  scale  were  made  with  a  concentration  of 
about  1  pint  to  40  gallons,  but,  on  the  other  hand,  more  solution  was 
applied  per  unit  of  soil.  Two  houses,  each  capable  of  growing  more  than 
1,000  rose  plants,  were  thoroughly  soaked  with  the  solution.  One  of 
the  houses  contained  raised  benches;  the  other,  ground  beds.  Both  had 
previously  grown  diseased  roses.  The  soil  was  replaced  by  soil  from 
outside  the  houses  before  sterilization.  In  the  light  of  what  we  now  know 
of  the  habits  of  Cylindrocladium,  it  is  safe  to  assume  that  this  soil  was 
infested,  because  soil  from  the  benches  in  previous  years  had  been  thrown 
out  near  it.  After  soaking  the  soil  thoroughly  the  houses  were  closed. 
Fumes  of  formaldehyde  were  so  strong  in  the  closed  houses  that  it  was 
not  possible  to  remain  in  them.  After  the  soil  had  dried  sufficiently  both 
houses  were  planted  with  roses  which  had  been  potted  in  soil  sterilized 


ROSE  CANKER  AND  ITS  CONTROL.         41 

with  steam,  and  which  had  been  kept  under  conditions  as  sterile  as  pos- 
sible. Three  months  after  planting,  no  disease  had  appeared  in  either 
house.  Soon  afterward  it  began  to  appear  in  the  house  with  the  ground 
beds,  and  gradually  increased  until,  almost  a  year  after  planting,  it  was 
generalh'  prevalent  throughout  the  house.  In  the  bench  house,  however, 
no  disease  has  as  yet  been  found,  although  plant-to-plant  inspections 
have  been  made  frequently  throughout  the  year.  The  fact  that  a  con- 
centration of  formaldehj'de  weaker  than  1  pint  to  25  gallons  controlled 
the  disease  in  the  bench  house  is  probably  due  to  the  longer  action  of  the 
more  concentrated  fumes,  and  probabh',  also,  partly  to  the  greater 
amount  of  the  solution  applied.  The  lack  of  control  in  the  ground  bed 
house  can  be  easily  explained  in  the  light  of  our  studies  on  the  depth  of 
penetration  of  the  mycelium  in  the  soil.  The  surface  soil  was  disin- 
fected, but  it  was  not  possible  to  disinfect  it  down  as  far  as  the  mycelium 
grows.  After  the  formaldehj-de  had  evaporated  the  deep  mycelium 
began  to  grow  upward,  and  during  that  period  the  plants  remained 
healthy;  but,  after  the  mycelium  had  grown  up  to  the  surface  again, 
the  cankers  began  to  appear  and  the  roses  became  as  badly  affected  as 
before  the  house  was  treated.  Two  conclusions  may  be  drawn  from 
this  experiment:  (1)  the  soil  can  be  disinfected  effectively  by  the  use 
of  formaldehyde,  and  (2)  ground  beds  cannot  be  sterilized  by  this  method. 


Disinfection  by  Heat.     Laboratory  Tests. 

The  feasibility  of  destroying  any  fungus  bj'  application  of  heat  to 
the  soil  manifestly  depends,  first  of  all,  on  the  thermal  death  point  of 
all  stages  of  that  fungus.  As  has  previously  been  described,  this  point 
for  Cylindrocladium  was  found  to  be  50°  C.  This  comparatively  low  death 
point  indicated  that  the  soil  could  be  readily  disinfected  by  steaming, 
because  a  temperature  much  higher  than  50°  C.  can  be  easily  obtained 
by  the  use  of  steam. 

Time  required  to  disinfect  Soil  by  steaming.  —  This  was  further  confirmed 
by  the  following  tests :  — 

Method.  —  Sterile  Petri  dishes  were  filled  with  soil  which  was  thoroughly  in- 
fested with  mycelium.  After  removing  the  lids  they  were  subjected  to  steam  at 
a  temperature  of  90°  to  95°  in  an  Arnold  sterilizer  for  the  desired  length  of  time. 
The  lids  were  then  replaced  and  the  soil  allowed  to  cool,  when  clods  of  it  were 
transferred  to  agar  plates  as  described  above.  Exposures  of  five,  ten,  fifteen,  twenty 
and  thirty  minutes  were  tried. 

No  mycelium  appeared  on  any  of  the  transfers,  even  after  five  min- 
utes' exposure.  Shorter  periods  of  exposure  were  not  tried  because  of 
the  uncertainty  of  securing  penetration  by  steam  in  less  than  five  minutes. 
But,  to  determine  what  effect  shorter  exposures  would  have  on  mycelium, 
tests  were  made  by  the  sealed  tube  method  described  for  thermal  death 
point  tests.  In  these  tests  the  mycelium  was  killed  in  less  than  one 
minute  when  exposed  to  a  temperature  of  95°  C. 


42  MASS.   EXPERIMENT    STATION    BULLETIN    183. 

From  these  tests  we  may  conclude  that  soil  can  be  disinfected  by  steam 
in  less  than  a  minute  if  penetration  is  obtained.  Apparently  effective- 
ness is  limited  only  by  the  time  required  for  the  steam  to  penetrate  every 
particle  of  the  soil. 

Greenhouse  Tests  of  Disinfection  by  Heat. 

Heat  may  be  applied  to  the  soil  by  steam  or  by  hot  water.  The  first 
method  has  been  in  use  in  the  greenhouses  for  the  disinfection  of  the 
soil  used  in  potting  since  the  beginning  of  this  investigation.  Perforated 
steam  pipes  were  laid  a  foot  apart  in  a  large  pit.  Soil  a  foot  deep  or  more 
was  piled  over  them  and  the  steam  turned  into  the  pipes.  Burlap  or  other 
coverings  may  be  used  to  cover  the  soil  and  make  it  retain  more  of  the 
steam.  Soil  thermometers  were  used  to  determine  the  temperature. 
It  is  only  necessary  to  keep  the  temperature  above  50°  C.  for  ten  min- 
utes. A  higher  temperature,  of  course,  makes  for  additional  safetj'. 
The  one  or  two  hours  of  heating  frequently  recommended  for  other 
diseases  is  onh^  wasted  time  and  expense,  being  entirely  unnecessary  for 
this  fungus.  Thousands  of  plants  have  been  potted  in  soil  disinfected 
in  this  way  during  the  last  j'ear,  and  canker  has  never  appeared  on  any 
of  them.  No  doubt  other  methods  of  steam  disinfection,  such  as  the 
inverted  pan  method,  would  be  equally  effective.  Either  method  could 
probably  be  used  just  as  effectively  on  the  benches,  but  the  formalde- 
hyde treatment  is  efficient,  and  quicker  and  easier  of  application. 

If  there  is  any  reason  to  suspect  the  presence  of  the  fungus  in  the 
manure  which  is  used  to  mulch  the  beds  it  may  be  disinfected  in  the  same 
way  as  the  potting  soil.  Soil  for  the  cutting  bench  may  also  be  treated 
in  the  same  way. 

The  second  method  of  applying  heat  —  by  the  use  of  boiling  water  — 
is  now  being  tested.  It  should  be  just  as  effective  as  steam,  and  at  the 
same  time  much  more  rapid.  The  boiling  water  is  forced  through  the 
water  pipes  ordinarily  used  in  the  house,  and  is  applied  to  the  soil  through 
a  hose  with  a  long  nozzle  and  a  handle  which  will  not  become  heated. 
The  water  should  be  applied  until  a  thermometer  inserted  into  the  soil 
at  anj^  point  and  at  any  depth  registers  above  50°  C.  Higher  temperatures 
make  for  additional  safety.  This  method  has  the  disadvantage  of 
leaving  the  soil  in  poorer  condition  for  working.  The  hot-water 
method  is  still  in  the  experimental  stage,  and  is  not  far  enough  along 
to  warrant  any  recommendations. 

Disinfection  of  Pots,  Tools,  etc. 
In  starting  new  houses  with  clean  plants  and  clean  soil,  it  is  very  es- 
sential that  everything  which  is  used  should  be  free  from  any  form  of 
inoculum.  The  first  danger  is  from  pots  which  have  been  previously 
used,  and  which  are  apt  to  contain  mycelium  or  spores  in  the  particles 
of  earth  which  still  cling  to  them.    They  can  be  sterilized  by  immersing 


ROSE    CANKER   AND    ITS   CONTROL.  43 

in  boiling  water  for  ten  minutes.  Steaming  is  just  as  effective.  The 
method  used  is  simply  a  matter  of  convenience. 

Usually  a  grower,  when  he  finds  disease  in  his  houses,  finds  it  imprac- 
ticable to  destroy  all  his  roses  and  start  all  over  again.  Therefore  he 
retains  some  of  his  old  houses  and  starts  disinfection  operations  on  one 
or  more,  from  which  he  has  removed  all  the  plants.  This  inevitably 
results  in  the  constant  danger  of  carrying  some  infested  soil  or  parts  of 
plants  from  the  infested  to  the  clean  houses.  Every  possible  precaution 
should  be  taken  to  guard  against  this,  because  a  failure  here  means  that 
the  work  must  all  be  done  again.  All  sorts  of  tools  offer  an  easy  means 
of  conveying  the  inoculum.  Whenever  possible  an  entirely  different 
set  of  tools  should  be  used  in  the  clean  houses,  and  no  tools  from  the 
other  houses  brought  in  under  any  conditions.  But,  if  this  is  not  possible, 
the  next  best  alternative  is  to  sterilize  the  tools  before  bringing  them  in. 
The  method  of  sterilizing  them  is  not  so  important  as  thoroughness. 
They  may  be  dipped  in  boiling  water,  steamed,  or  a  barrel  of  Bordeaux 
mixture  or  formaldehyde  —  preferably  stronger  than  1  pint  to  25  gallons 
in  this  case  —  may  be  used  for  soaking  the  tools. 

It  may  be  necessary  to  sterilize  other  things  besides  pots  and  tools, 
e.g.,  boots  and  clothes  of  workmen.  Every  grower,  after  learning  the 
habits  of  the  pathogene,  must  decide  for  himself  on  the  best  way,  under 
his  own  conditions,  of  keeping  his  houses  clean. 


Protection  of  the  Host. 

By  protection  we  mean  the  placing  of  a  barrier  between  a  plant  and 
a  pathogene  which  would  otherwise  attack  it  and  cause  disease.  This 
is  well  exemplified  in  the  extensively  used  practice  of  spraying  plants, 
the  fungicide  forming  a  poison  barrier  through  which  the  fungus  cannot 
penetrate.  The  humicolous  habit  and  underground  method  of  attack 
of  the  canker  fungus  seem  to  preclude  any  hope  of  important  benefit  from 
spraying.  There  is  one  place  in  the  propagation  of  roses,  however,  where 
a  fungicidal  covering  might  be  beneficial.  Scions  and  cuttings  should, 
whenever  possible,  be  taken  from  houses  known  to  be  clean.  If  they 
are  taken  from  houses  in  which  the  disease  occurs  there  is  always  a 
possibility  of  spores  being  lodged  on  them,  even  where  lesions  have  not 
as  yet  appeared.  To  either  wash  o&  ahd  kill  these  spores  or,  at  least,  to 
prevent  germination  where  they  are,  it  has  been  the  practice  during  this 
investigation  to  dip  all  such  cuttings  in  a  fungicide  before  grafting  or 
planting. 

Comparative  Value  of  Different  Fungicidal  Coverings. 
In  order  to  find  the  best  fungicide  to  use  for  dipping,  and  also  to  secure 
data  for  use  in  case  spraying  should  be  found  advisable  at  any  time,  the 
comparative  value  of  a  number  of  fungicides  was  tested  in  the  laboratory. 


44  MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    183. 

Method.  —  Glass  slides  were  sprayed  with  the  fungicide  to  be  tested  and  per- 
mitted to  dry  for  varying  periods  of  time.  Then  spores  of  the  fungus  in  a  drop  of 
water  were  transferred  to  the  center  of  the  sprayed  slide,  which  was  then  kept 
in  a  moist  chamber  for  twenty-four  hours.  Checks  on  unsprayed  slides  were 
always  made  at  the  same  time.  Percentages  of  germination  were  counted  at  the 
end  of  twenty-four  hours,  and  observations  were  taken  for  several  days  to  see  if 
there  was  any  further  development;  but  none  of  the  results  in  these  tests  were 
modified  by  later  observations.  When  a  dry  fungicide  was  used  it  was  dusted  on 
to  the  slide  without  water.    All  checks  in  these  tests  germinated  over  95  per  cent. 

Lime-sulfur.  ■ —  Concentrations  of  1-10,  1-30  and  1-50  commercial 
lime-sulfur  solution  were  used.  The  1-50  concentration  proved  to  be 
useless  from  the  start.  The  1-30  seemed  to  check  germination  at  first, 
but  after  it  had  been  on  the  slide  four  or  five  days  over  50  per  cent,  of 
the  spores  germinated.  The  1-10  concentration  entirely  prevented 
germination  when  fresh,  but  after  a  week  the  control  was  erratic,  with 
over  50  per  cent,  germination  on  some  of  the  slides.  Commercial  lime- 
sulfur  seems  to  be  useless  for  control  of  this  fungus. 

Dry  Sulfur  Flour.  —  Slides  were  very  heavily  dusted  and  the  germina- 
tion tests  made  at  about  25°  C.  The  presence  of  the  sulfur  had  no  effect 
whatever  on  the  spores.  They  germinated  just  as  well  as  the  checks. 
Dry  sulfur  appears  to  be  even  less  effective  than  the  lime-sulfur. 

Ammoniacal  Copper  Carbonate.  —  This  fungicide  prevented  germina- 
tion twenty-four  hours  after  being  dried,  but  when  tried  a  week  later  was 
only  25  per  cent,  efficient.    This  would  hardly  be  a  safe  fungicide. 

Lime.  —  Milk  of  lime  sprayed  on  the  slides  from  an  atomizer  pre- 
vented germination  from  the  first,  and  was  just  as  effective  as  Bordeaux. 
Milk  of  lime  is  not  suitable  for  dipping  cuttings.  The  lime  test  was 
made  with  a  different  end  in  view. 

Bordeaux  Mixture.  —  This  fungicide  was  made  up  at  a  strength  of 
4-4-50.  Germination  tests  were  made  every  day  for  twenty-one  days 
after  the  slides  were  sprayed.  No  germination  occurred  in  any  of  these 
tests.  These  fungicidal  tests  clearly  indicate  Bordeaux  mixture  as  the 
most  suitable  solution  for  dipping  cuttings. 


Treatment  of  the  Walks  in  the  House. 
Undoubtedly  the  walks  between  the  benches  of  a  house  which  has 
previously  grown  diseased  roses  are  infested  with  the  pathogene.  One 
could  easily  think  of  a  great  many  ways  in  which  small  particles  of  soil 
from  the  walks  could  be  carried  into  the  benches.  It  is  therefore  necessary 
either  to  keep  the  fungus  killed  out  of  the  surface  of  the  walks  by  repeated 
applications  of  some  fungicide  or  to  cover  the  walks  with  some  sub- 
stance which  will  be  a  barrier  through  which  it  cannot  pass  up  to  the 
benches.  In  the  beginning  of  this  investigation  the  walks  were  kept 
sterile  by  frequent  applications  of  formaldehyde.  This  proved  unsatis- 
factory because  the  fumes  of  formaldehyde  often  injure  the  roses,  pro- 
ducing dead  spots  on  the  leaves.     This  was  abandoned  and  a  search 


ROSE    CANKER   AND    ITS   CONTROL.  45 

begun  for  something  more  suitable.  Up  to  the  present,  lime  gives  the 
best  promise  of  making  a  satisfactorj'  barrier.  Sterile  bottle  tests  show 
that  the  mycelium  will  not  grow  in  soil  containing  air-slaked  lime  at 
the  rate  of  I5  pounds  per  cubic  foot.  Neither  will  spores  germinate  in 
the  presence  of  lime.  Until  something  more  satisfactory  is  found  it  is 
recommended  that  all  walks  in  the  houses  be  kept  covered  with  lime. 
Not  only  will  this  furnish  an  effective  barrier  to  the  fungus  coming  up 
from  below,  but  it  will  also  prevent  growth  of  spores  and  other  inocula 
brought  in  from  other  houses  on  the  shoes  of  workmen  and  visitors. 


Immunization  of  the  Host. 

By  immunization  we  mean  either  the  development  of  varieties  of  roses 
which  are  immune,  —  at  least  highly  resistant,  —  or  rendering  them 
immune  by  injection  or  feeding  through  the  roots  with  some  chemical. 
No  work  has  been  done  along  either  of  these  lines  in  regard  to  rose  canker. 
From  the  first  it  has  been  noticed  that  some  varieties  of  roses  are  more 
susceptible  than  others.  No  doubt  in  the  course  of  time  desirable  varieties 
will  be  found  or  developed  which  will  not  suffer  from  canker.  How  soon 
that  will  be  no  one  can  predict.  A  rose  breeder  of  wide  national  reputa- 
tion told  the  writer  that  he  had  spent  most  of  his  life  producing  four  or 
five  varieties  of  roses.  It  is  a  long  process,  and  until  such  varieties  are 
developed  it  will  be  necessary  to  resort  to  such  emergency  measures  as 
have  been  described  in  this  bulletin. 


Summary  of  Control  Measures. 

In  the  light  of  all  that  we  know  about  rose  canker  and  its  causal  path- 
ogene  the  following  measures  are  recommended  for  its  control :  — 

1.  Carefully  inspect  the  rose  house  to  see  if  canker  is  present.  If 
not,  employ  every  means  to  prevent  its  entering,  —  import  as  few  roses 
as  possible  from  other  houses;  examine  carefully  every  plant  brought  in; 
reject  any  with  suspicious  dead  areas  in  the  bark. 

2.  If  it  is  present  on  the  roses  it  cannot  be  eradicated  from  the  infected 
plants.  The  only  hope  lies  in  starting  new  plants  from  clean  cuttings  in 
clean  soil,  and  guarding  against  infection  at  every  step  in  the  plant's 
development. 

3.  Dip  the  cuttings  in  Bordeaux  mixture. 

4.  Sterilize  the  pots  by  dipping  for  ten  minutes  in  boiling  water. 

5.  Sterilize  the  potting  soil  and  cutting  bench  soil  by  steaming  to  a 
temperature  of  over  50°  C.  for  ten  minutes  or  more.  Suspected  manure 
should  be  treated  in  the  same  way. 

6.  Use  raised  benches,  not  ground  beds. 

7.  Remove  old  soil  if  diseased  roses  have  been  grown  in  it,  and  soak 
the  benches  thoroughly  with  (1)  formaldehyde  at  the  rate  of  1  pint  to 
25  gallons,  or  (2)  boiling  water. 


46  MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    183. 

8.  Sterilize  the  bench  soil  by  one  of  these  two  methods.  If  formalde- 
hyde is  used,  apply  at  the  rate  of  2  gallons  per  cubic  foot.  If  boiling 
water  is  used,  apply  until  every  part  of  the  soil  is  heated  above  50°  C. 

9.  Use  a  different  set  of  tools  in  the  clean  house,  or  sterilize  all  tools 
before  bringing  them  in. 

10.  Keep  the  walks  in  all  houses  covered  with  lime. 


LITERATURE  CITED. 

Morgan,  A.  P.,  1892.  "Two  New  Genera  of  Hyphomycetes."  Bot.  Gaz.  17: 
190-192. 

Ellis,  J.  B.,  and  Everhart,  B.  M.,  1900.  "New  Species  of  Fungi  from  Various 
Localities,  with  Notes  on  Some  Published  Species."  Btil.  Tor.  Bot.  Club  27: 
49-64. 

Massey,  L.  M.,  1917.  "The  Crown  Canker  Disease  of  the  Rose."  Phytopathol- 
ogy 7:  408^17. 


BULLETIN  No.    184. 


DEPARTMENT  OF  ENTOMOLOGY. 


LATE  DORMANT  VERSUS  DELAYED  DOR- 
MANT OR  GREEN  TIP  TREATMENT  FOR 
THE  CONTROL  OF  APPLE  APHIDS. 


BY  W.  S.  REGAN. 


In  carrying  on  field  experiments  during  the  summer  of  1917  for  the 
control  of  potato  plant  lice,  commercial  Ume-sulfur  solution,  among 
other  materials,  was  tested  as  to  its  effectiveness.  Although  this  was 
used  at  the  rate  of  1  gallon  to  22  gallons  of  water,  about  twice  the  ordinary- 
summer  strength,  and  in  spite  of  the  fact  that  every  precaution  was 
taken  to  drench  thoroughly  all  parts  of  the  plants,  the  percentage  of 
plant  lice  killed  was  so  small,  under  10  per  cent.,  that  it  could  in  no  way 
be  considered  of  value  as  an  aphidicide  at  a  strength  safe  to  use  upon 
potato  foliage. 

Object  of  Comparative  Tests. 

The  results  of  these  tests  led  the  writer  to  question  just  how  effective 
the  usual  dormant  strength,  1  to  8,  of  Hme-sulfur  would  prove  against 
apple  aphids  when  apphed  at  the  delayed  dormant  period,  just  after  the 
eggs  have  hatched.  With  a  view  to  determining  this  point,  a  number  of 
tests  have  been  carried  out  during  the  past  several  weeks.  In  these 
experiments  commercial  lime-sulfur  solution  was  used  alone  and  in  com- 
bination with  nicotine  sulfate,  and  several  brands  of  proprietary  mis- 
cible  oils  were  also  tried  out  in  comparison.  Tests  were  also  made  to 
determine  the  effect  of  lime-sulfur  and  miscible  oils  upon  the  unhatched 
eggs. 

Delayed  Dormant  Period  indicative  of  Complete  Hatching  of 

Aphid  Eggs. 

Remarks  might  be  prefaced  here  by  the  statement  that  the  term 

dormant  is  taken  to  mean  the  condition  of  the  buds  in  the  winter  or 

early  spring  before  they  begin  to  swell.    By  late  dormant  is  meant  the 

swollen  condition  of  the  buds  at  the  time  just  before  they  spht  open,  or 


48  MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    184. 

in  other  words  just  before  the  buds  show  the  least  bit  of  green.  This 
condition  would  normally  be  reached  during  the  early  part  of  April  in 
Massachusetts.  The  term  delayed  dormant  is  applied  to  that  period  in 
the  development  of  the  cluster  buds  and  foliage  when  they  have  ex- 
panded from  a  quarter  to  a  half  inch. 

It  is  more  or  less  axiomatic  that  the  hatching  of  the  aphid  eggs  is  about 
coincident  with  the  first  splitting  of  the  apple  buds,  and  that  by  the 
time  the  buds  have  expanded  from  a  quarter  to  a  half  inch,  the  delaj^ed 
dormant  period,  practically  all  of  the  eggs  have  hatched  and  the  young 
plant  hce  have  migrated  to  the  new  growth  for  food.  Observations 
have  confirmed  this.  Twigs  brought  in  from  the  field  and  examined  on 
April  17  had  numerous  plant  lice  eggs  upon  them,  but  none  of  these 
had  hatched.  The  buds  were  in  the  late  dormant  condition.  Twigs 
brought  in  on  April  19  were  found  to  have  a  few  newly  hatched  individ- 
uals, which  had  migrated  to  those  buds  just  beginning  to  expand  and 
show  the  least  bit  of  green  available  for  feeding  purposes.  From  the 
19th  to  the  24th  of  April,  newly  hatched  aphids  appeared  in  increasing 
numbers.  After  the  latter  date  only  a  few  new  indi\dduals  appeared, 
which  could  be  readily  determined  by  their  size.  It  is  evident  from  this 
that  under  favorable  weather  conditions  such  as  existed  during  the 
period  mentioned  the  time  of  maximum  emergence  is  rather  brief.  The 
presence  of  a  few  newly  hatched  individuals  on  some  of  the  twigs  on 
May  1  indicated  that  a  small  number  of  belated  aphids  were  still  hatching 
from  the  eggs,  but  in  no  case  observed  had  the  foliage  expanded  beyond 
about  half  an  inch  before  hatching  was  completed.  No  viviparously 
produced  aphids  were  in  evidence  at  this  time. 

Object  of  Delayed  Dormant  Spraying. 

In  the  past  the  practice  of  sprajdng  with  lime-suKur  for  the  control  of 
San  Jose  scale  has  been  confined  for  the  most  part  to  the  dormant  or  late 
dormant  season.  Comparatively  recently,  however,  the  practice  of  de- 
layed dormant  spraying  with  lime-sulfur  has  been  quite  generally  advo- 
cated, based  on  the  assumption  that  such  treatment  is  fully  as  effective 
as  dormant  or  late  dormant  season  applications  against  the  San  Jos6  scale, 
and  that  apple  plant  lice  in  their  active  stages  would  offer  less  resistance 
to  this  insecticide  than  the  unhatched  eggs.  In  other  words,  it  is  beUeved 
by  some  that  a  delayed  application  of  lime-sulfur  at  full  dormant-season 
strength,  just  after  the  buds  have  split  open  and  have  expanded  perhaps 
not  over  half  an  inch,  will  control  the  San  Jos6  scale,  and  to  quite  an 
extent  the  apple  plant  lice  as  well.  Applications  at  this  time,  practice 
has  shown,  can  be  made  with  little  or  no  eventual  injury  to  the  foUage. 
Our  tests,  so  far  as  the  efficiency  of  the  delayed  applications  of  lime- 
sulfur  in  controlling  plant  lice  is  concerned,  have  by  no  means  borne  out 
this  conclusion.  From  the  standpoint  of  the  fungicidal  value  of  lime- 
sulfur,  delayed  dormant  applications  appear  to  have  some  advantage 
over  those  of  the  dormant  season. 


TREATMENT    FOR    CONTROL    OF   APPLE    APHIDS.      49 

On  the  other  hand  it  has  been  recognized  by  some  that  only  by  the 
addition  of  nicotine  sulfate  to  the  lime-sulfur  solution,  when  this  is  ap- 
plied as  a  delayed  dormant  spray,  can  the  aphids  be  satisfactorily  con- 
trolled. This  would  indicate  that  the  nicotine  sulfate  is  mainly  respon- 
sible for  the  control  of  the  plant  lice,  and  that  the  only  reason  for  delaying 
the  lime-sulfur  treatment  and  combining  it  with  nicotine  sulfate  is  to 
make  necessary  only  one  application  instead  of  two.  Then,  too,  some 
advocate  the  addition  of  an  arsenical  to  the  above  combination,  at  the 
delayed  dormant  period,  for  the  control  of  bud  moth,  case  bearers,  etc., 
making  possible,  theoretically  at  least,  by  this  insecticide  combination 
the  control  of  San  Jos6  scale,  apple  aphids  and  certain  foliage  feeders  by 
one  application. 

Comparative  Tests  for  the   Destruction  of  Aphid  Eggs  under 
Laboratory  Conditions. 

The  first  tests  were  made  for  the  purpose  of  determining  the  com- 
parative efficiency  of  lime-sulfur  solution  and  miscible  oils  against  the 
unhatched  aphid  eggs.  The  lime-sulfur  was  a  fresh  sample  of  a  com- 
mercial concentrate,  having  a  density  of  34°  Beaum^.  This  was  used  at 
the  strength  recommended  upon  the  container  for  dormant  appUcations, 
1  to  8.  Two  proprietary  miscible  oils  were  tested,  these  being  diluted 
1  to  15,  the  usual  dormant-season  strength.  Although  both  samples 
were  fresh  from  the  manufacturers,  one  was  evidently  imperfect  as  there 
was  some  free  oil  present.  In  the  tests,  however,  this  imperfect  sample 
showed  to  less  advantage  in  destrojdng  the  eggs  than  the  well-prepared 
sample,  a  rather  unexpected  outcome,  perhaps,  in  view  of  the  presence 
of  free  oil.  These  tests,  as  in  the  case  of  those  following  in  which  the  aim 
was  to  determine  the  comparative  killing  efficiency,  were  carried  out  in 
the  laboratory,  where  careful  counts  could  be  made  and  results  checked. 
Dipping  the  infested  apple  twigs  was  resorted  to  rather  than  spraj'ing, 
in  order  to  insure  uniformity  of  treatment,  as  by  the  latter  method  any 
variability  of  application  might  lead  to  an  improper  interpretation.  On 
examination,  shortly  after  the  infested  twigs  were  brought  in  from  the 
field,  it  was  impossible  to  make  any  estimate  of  the  probable  number  of 
eggs  that  would  hatch,  since  a  large  percentage  of  the  eggs  were  apparently 
dead  from  some  cause,  as  indicated  by  their  shriveled  condition.  Twigs 
of  as  nearly  the  same  size  and  degree  of  infestation  as  possible  were  se- 
lected for  insecticide  treatment  and  check,  the  average  length  of  the 
twigs  being  about  8  inches.  No  definite  percentage  of  efficiency  can  be 
given  for  the  tests  against  the  eggs.  The  results  should  be  taken  as 
merely  comparative  and  in  the  way  of  a  generaUzation,  and  are  perhaps 
in  need  of  further  verification  both  in  the  laboratory  and  under  field  con- 
ditions. The  tests  against  the  unhatched  eggs  were  begun  when  the 
buds  were  in  the  late  dormant  condition  and  at  such  a  short  time  before 
hatching  occurred  that  it  was  impossible  to  carry  out  verification  checks. 
The  results  are  given  in  the  following  table :  — 


50 


MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    184. 


Comparative  Efficiency  of  Lime-Sulfur  ar^d  Miscihle  Oils  against  Apple 
Aphid  Eggs  in  the  Late  Dormant  Period  under  Laboratory  Condi- 
tions. 


Material  and 
Dilution. 

Hatch  on  Treated 
Twigs. 

Hatch  on  Check. 

Injury  to 
Twigs. 

Lime-sulfur,  1  to  8,  . 
Miscible  oi!  A,  1  to  15, 
Miscible  oil  B,  1  to  15,      . 

No   hatching  on  three 

twigs. 
Thirty-eix  eggs  hatched 

on  three  twigs. 
Seven  eggs  hatched  on 

three  twigs. 

Twenty-nine  eggs  hatched. 
Twenty-four  eggs  hatched, 
Fifty-four  eggs  hatched,    . 

No  injury. 
No  injury. 
No  injury. 

Discussion  of  Results. 

Wliile  these  results  can  hardly  be  accepted  as  conclusive,  for  the  reasons 
given  above,  it  seems  evident  that  lime-sulfur  thoroughly  applied  at  the 
late  dormant  period  is  highly  effective  under  favorable  conditions  in 
destroying  the  aphid  eggs,  and  is  certainly  more  efficient  against  this 
stage  of  the  insect  than  miscible  oils.  Of  course,  in  dipping  the  twigs  it 
is  to  be  expected  that  better  results  would  be  obtained  than  in  the  ordinary 
practice  of  orchard  spraying,  and  it  is  also  true  that  under  field  conditions, 
as  will  be  pointed  out  under  the  topic  "Action  of  Lime-sulfur  and  Miscible 
Oils  upon  the  Aphid  Eggs,"  discussed  later,  the  intervention  of  rain 
between  the  time  of  application  and  the  normal  hatching  period  might 
alter  results  to  a  marked  degree.  This  may  account  to  some  extent  for 
the  frequent  ineffective  control  of  apple  aphids  by  the  dormant  or  late 
dormant  season  lime-sulfur  treatment,  with  which  absolute  thoroughness 
is  practically  impossible  under  field  conditions,  and  which  has  also  the 
added  element  of  uncertainty  of  results  due  to  the  meteorological  factor 
just  mentioned.  The  hatching  of  a  comparatively  small  number  of  eggs 
that  have  survived  treatment  might  result  in  quite  a  severe  infestation 
before  the  season  is  far  advanced.  There  is  also  to  be  considered  the 
possibilit}^  of  reinfestation  from  other  sources  by  migrants  in  the  case  of 
the  green  apple  aphis.  The  destruction  of  the  eggs  or  suppression  of  the 
stem  mothers  in  the  spring  does  not  always  guarantee  freedom  from 
these  insects  during  midsummer,  when  supplementary  treatments  are 
sometimes  desirable  or  necessary.  The  miscible  oils  do  not  appear  to  be 
very  effective  against  the  aphid  eggs,  even  with  absolute  thoroughness  of 
application;  and  it  is  probable  that  a  sufficient  number  of  eggs  would 
withstand  the  treatment,  to  produce  a  severe  infestation  later  in  the 
season,  unless  other  measures  were  taken  for  control. 

Action  of  Lime-sidfur  and  Miscible  Oils  upon  the  Aphid  Eggs.  —  Obser- 
vations as  to  the  killing  power  of  the  lime-sulfur  against  the  aphid  eggs 
indicate  that  the  effectiveness  of  this  material  is  due  mainlj'  to  a  me- 
chanical action.  On  twigs  examined  after  dipping,  it  was  noticed  that  as 
the  lime-sulfur  dried  it  tended  to  stick  down  the  eggs  and  mat  the  twig 


1 


TREATMENT   FOR   CONTROL   OF   APPLE    APHIDS.       51 

pubescence  over  them  in  such  a  manner  that  the  deUcate  insects  were 
apparentl.v  unable  to  force  their  way  from  the  eggs.  This  fact  —  that 
the  action  of  Hme-sulfur  against  the  unhatched  eggs  appears  to  be  mainly 
mechanical  —  presents  an  element  of  great  uncertainty  concerning  results 
that  would  obtain  under  field  conditions.  For  instance,  the  occurrence 
of  a  rain  between  the  time  of  application  and  the  normal  hatching  time 
for  the  eggs  might  alter  results  to  a  great  extent,  as  many  of  the  eggs 
which  are  stuck  down  and  potentially  unable  to  hatch  would  probably 
thus  be  liberated,  so  that  hatching  might  result.  This  contingency 
emphasizes  the  desirability  of  making  the  application  of  the  lime-sulfur 
at  the  late  dormant  period  if  success  against  the  aphid  eggs  is  aimed  at, 
in  order  to  make  the  space  of  time  between  treatment  and  the  normal 
hatching  period  as  brief  as  possible,  and  to  eliminate  any  unfavorable 
meteorological  factors  that  might  lessen  the  efficiency.  As  will  be  shown 
later  the  various  elements  that  combine  to  make  aphid  control  by  lime- 
sulfur  treatment  against  the  eggs  during  the  dormant  or  late  dormant 
periods  a  matter  of  much  uncertainty,  as  compared  with  other  practices 
discussed  later,  miUtate  against  its  use  at  either  of  these  periods,  unless 
no  other  treatment  against  the  aphids  is  intended,  in  which  case  the  late 
dormant  treatment  should  give  the  most  satisfactory  results.  No  such 
mechanical  action  was  evident  in  the  case  of  the  miscible  oils,  so  that 
whatever  killing  of  the  eggs  may  have  resulted  from  the  use  of  these 
insecticides  was  undoubtedly  of  a  chemical  nature. 

COMPAEATIVE   TeSTS   FOR  THE   DESTRUCTION   OF   THE   LiVING  ApPLE 

Aphids. 

These  tests  were  made  against  living  apple  aphids  on  twigs  whose 
foliage  showed  varying  degrees  of  expansion  from  just  after  the  splitting 
open  of  the  buds,  the  real  delayed  dormant  period,  up  to  a  development 
of  three-fourths  of  an  inch  or  more,  the  latter  being  tested  mainly  to 
determine  the  extent  of  foliage  injury  Jikely  to  result  from  the  treatment. 
Full  dormant-season  strength  of  lime-sulfur  and  miscible  oils  was  used 
and  this  same  strength  of  lime-sulfur  in  combination  with  nicotine  sul- 
fate, observations  being  made  both  as  to  their  killing  power  and  their 
effect  upon  the  foliage.  Careful  counts  were  made  of  the  number  of 
living  plant  lice  present  upon  the  twigs  before  and  after  the  dipping 
treatment,  and  from  this  the  killing  efficiency  of  each  material  could  be 
readilv  estimated.    The  results  follow :  — 


52 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    184. 


.«  "^ 


^ 
^ 


O 


• 

>>^ 

C    ?    CJ 

„ 

eo 

lO 

M 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

=  .£o 

OJ 

CJ 

05 

C5 

o 

o 

o 

o 

Q 

o 

o 

o 

o 

~  « 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

WE  S 

— ' 

Wfe 

6 

S' 

^ 

>. 

C3 

Ui 

;:2 

s 

3 

O 

fe 

'c 

_c 

C 

>, 

^ 

_2 

^ 

>, 

>^ 

© 

^ 

^ 

>, 

^ 

>, 

>, 

o 

u 

^ 

s 

cd 

^ 

k< 

k^ 

c3 

tH 

u 

tH 

3 

3 

3 

_3 

3 

_3 

_3 

3 

_3 

3 

3 

|c 

]e 

is 

'c 

"a 

2 

is 

|c 

is 

'c 

is 

is 

^ 

£ 

5 

^ 

.S 

,3 

J= 

j: 

.i3 

S 

_bl) 

_M 

c 

_M 

.£f 

.Sf 

C 

_M 

_M 

.£P 

_M 

.£P 

bi 

o 

o 

CB 

t» 

O 

W 

cc 

M 

U 

CB 

W 

IB 

oo 

CO 

in 

c 

S 

0. 

C 

c 

c 

c 

e" 

c" 

c 

c 

o 

q; 

a> 

o 

o 

O' 

o 

tt) 

o 

'© 

ft 

ft 

ft 

ft 

ft 

ft 

ft 

ft 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

0 

o 

o 

0) 

0 

0< 

_d 

_e 

a 

a 

_c 

c" 

fi" 
ft 

c" 
o 
ft 

c 

.S 

© 
ft 

_c 

■s 

o 

:i 

V-i" 

\N 

5 

-\ 

o 

o 

o 

:i 

^ 

o 

:J 

pa 

a 

5 

5 

S 

S 

o 

_d 

.S 

.s 

o 

2 

6 

2 

5 

^ 

^ 

:s; 

:jr 

s 

S 

5 

5 

:?; 

:s5; 

5 

y: 

_j 

o 

S 

g 

t.  2 

„ 

CO 

(M 

CO 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

> 

lO 

t>- 

O 

►J 

»? 

5  « 
^2 

b. 

a 

H 

O 

s 

0. 

< 

,.,0 

n 

£  2 

CO 

00 

<M 

W5 

lO 

05 

00 

•* 

■.«< 

o 

00 

O 

M 

U5 

•* 

lO 

N 

es 

eo 

N 

IS 

H 

bb 

" 

■g 

< 

ffl 

o 

Q 

< 

P5 

o 

a 

W 

< 

< 

CO 

U 

H 

o 

o 

g 

o 

00 

s 

§ 

s 

s 

s 

5 

o 

s 

55 

.-t 

.-1 

^.M 

^^ 

O 

qT 

OJ 

01 

a 

o 

H 

-ij 

•^ 

p 

c€ 

5 

"S 

•^ 

3 

>J 

Q 

"B 

3 

3 

3 

3 

00 

m 

m 

m 

ai 

o 

» 

O 

<a 

© 

Q 

c 

g 

C 

C 

C 

>; 

•^ 

■^ 

*^ 

1 

1 

8 

8 

o 

c 

s 

c 

S 

'a 

5 

■d 

T5 

-d 

-0 

■« 

w 

■< 

C9 

a 

03 

a 

C3 

Ui 

U) 

U5 

u> 

00 

00 

oo" 

00 

00 

00 

oo" 

oo" 

oo" 

O 

2 

2 

s 

o 

_0 

_o 

s 

_0 

o 

2 

5 

s 

< 

n 

m" 

PQ 

s 

^ 

SI 

■B 

c 

3 

3 

•B 

_3 

"o 

'3 

"S 

■© 

1 

"a 

"5 

3 

"3 

"3 

"s 

"3 

3 

<P 

a 

.2 

.2 

s 

^ 

V 

t 

? 

2 

£ 

i 

3 
'S 
.2 

3 

3 
1 

3 

s 

S 

fi 

B 

1 

a 

a 

S 

3 

3 

3 

2 

3 

Ij 

2 

2 

2 

;^ 

1 

S 

1 

TREATMENT  FOR   CONTROL   OF   APPLE   APHIDS.       53 


Discussion  of  Results. 

Efficiency  of  Lime-sulfur  against  the  Aphids.  —  It  is  evident  from  the 
foregoing  that  Ume-sulfur  alone  appUed  at  the  delayed  dormant  period 
even  at  full  dormant-season  strength  is  practically  worthless  in  con- 
trolling apple  aphids.  Actual  count  shows  this  material  to  be  under  10 
per  cent,  efficient,  and  in  every  case  the  delicate,  recently  hatched  aphids 
were  the  onlj^  ones  affected.  In  addition  to  those  killed,  a  few  were  more 
or  less  permanently  incapacitated,  judging  from  their  feeble  condition, 
but  even  if  these  were  included  in  the  "kill,"  it  would  alter  the  results 
given  only  slightly.  The  count  to  determine  the  number  of  plant  hce 
killed  was  made  at  later  periods  of  the  day  on  which  treatment  was 
applied  and  on  subsequent  daj-s  until  all  deaths  due  to  the  treatment 
could  be  checked  up.  It  should  be  kept  in  mind  that  all  the  twigs  were 
thoroughly  dipped  and  that  the  ordinary  orchard  spraying  would  prob- 
ably be  even  less  effective,  unless  perhaps  the  apphcation  of  the  spray 
under  pressure  might  possibly  dislodge  some  of  the  plant  Uce  and  thus 
counterbalance  the  less  thorough  application.  Observations  made  after 
treatment  showed  that  the  older  plant  lice  were  apparently  unaffected 
and  were  quietly  feeding,  except  where  the  coating  or  drying  out  of  the 
buds  by  the  lime-sulfur  made  it  necessary  for  them  to  seek  suitable  feed- 
ing places  elsewhere. 

Action  of  Lime-sulfur  upon  the  Aphids.  —  The  action  of  the  lime-sulfur 
upon  the  j'oung  plant  lice,  the  only  stage  of  the  active  insects  against 
which  it  appears  to  have  any  particular  effect,  seems  to  be  mainly  me- 
chanical, in  that  it  sticks  these  delicate  young  to  the  twigs  in  such  a 
manner  that  death  is  probably  the  result  of  starvation.  Death  occurred 
very  slowly  in  some  cases,  since  the  insects  were  often  found  feebly 
struggling  to  liberate  themselves  several  hours  after  the  treatment. 

Foliage  Injury  by  Lime-sulfur.  —  The  effect  of  the  lime-sulfur  upon  the 
opening  foliage  was  noted  both  in  the  laboratory  and  upon  field-sprayed 
trees,  where  more  rehable  data  of  this  nature  could  be  obtained.  While 
a  number  of  elements  may  enter  in  to  affect  results,  such  as  the  variety 
of  apple,  weather  conditions,  pressure  under  which  the  apphcation  is 
made,  etc.,  our  tests  showed  that  little  or  no  eventual  injury  results  from 
the  use  of  dormant-season  strength  lime-sulfur  where  the  buds  have  not 
expanded  beyond  a  half  inch.  Upon  sprayed  trees,  where  expansion 
beyond  this  point  had  occurred,  injury  was  more  evident,  but  even  on 
treated  trees,  with  the  foliage  out  three-fourths  of  an  inch  to  an  inch  or 
more,  an  examination  several  weeks  after  application  showed  Httle  other 
than  tip  injury  in  most  cases.  It  seems  advisable,  however,  from  the 
standpoint  of  thoroughness  if  for  no  other  reason,  to  confine  such  spray- 
ing within  the  delayed  dormant  period.  It  was  noted  that  the  long 
pubescence  on  foliage  that  had  expanded  to  about  half  an  inch,  but  had 
not  unfolded  to  any  extent,  appeared  to  shed  the  lime-suLfur  readily  or 
absorb  it  only  in  occasional  spots,  which  resulted  in  injury  at  these 


54  MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    184. 

points;  whereas  the  shorter,  matted  pubescence  of  the  bark  and  bud 
scales  absorbed  it  readily,  and  on  this  account  more  injury  was  often 
caused  to  those  buds  just  splitting  open  than  to  those  slightly  more 
advanced. 

Efficiency  of  Lime-sulfur  and  Nicotine  sulfate  combined  against  the 
Aphids.  —  Previous  tests  have  shown  that  nicotine  sulfate  at  the  dilu- 
tion 1  to  800  is  practically  a  perfect  aphidicide.  The  addition  of  lime- 
sulfur  probably  increases  its  efficiency  very  little,  so  that  the  only  logical 
reason  for  the  use  of  this  combination  at  the  delayed  donnant  period  is 
for  the  purpose  of  saving  labor  by  combining  two  operations  —  the  San 
Jose  scale  treatment  and  aphid  treatment  —  in  one.  Laboratory  tests 
where  absolute  thoroughness  of  application  by  dipping  was  possible 
showed  this  combination  to  be  100  per  cent,  effective.  The  effectiveness 
of  this  combination  under  field  conditions  would  depend  mainly  on 
thoroughness  of  application. 

Action  of  the  Lime-sulfur-nicotine  sulfate  Combination  wpon  the  Aphids. 
• — As  already  indicated  the  action  of  lime-sulfur  in  killing  the  aphids 
appears  to  be  mainly  mechanical,  —  by  sticking  them  to  the  plant  so 
that  in  most  cases  death  is  probably  the  result  of  starvation.  The  action 
of  the  nicotine  sulfate  in  killing  the  aphids  is  rather  slow,  requiring  from 
about  half  an  hour  to  twenty-four  hours  or  more  for  different  individuals. 
Immediately  after  the  dipping  there  was  no  evidence  that  the  treatment 
had  any  effect  upon  the  aphids.  In  about  fifteen  minutes,  however, 
considerable  restlessness  was  apparent  and  inside  of  half  an  hour  a  num- 
ber of  the  plant  lice  had  begun  to  drop  from  the  twigs,  some  being  pre- 
cipitated rather  forcefully  as  if  from  strong  muscular  contraction.  These 
lay  struggling  feebly  but  unable  to  crawl,  gradually  becoming  dark 
colored  and  motionless.  Those  plant  lice  that  survived  the  treatment  for 
a  number  of  hours  appeared  after  a  few  hours  to  be  paralyzed  and  in- 
capable of  either  locomotion  or  feeding,  but  were  feebly  moving  their 
legs  and  antennae  and  excreting  honey  dew  in  abnormally  large  amounts. 
An  examination  of  the  twigs  forty-eight  hours  after  treatment  showed  all 
the  plant  lice  to  be  dead.  The  fact  that  nicotine  sulfate  kills  rather 
slowly  may  account  for  the  occasional  reports  that  this  material  is  in- 
effective against  plant  lice.  Examination  of  treated  plants  shortly  after 
application  might  readily  lead  to  this  conclusion,  but  if  sufficient  time  is 
allowed  before  examination  there  will  be  no  question  as  to  its  effective- 
ness. 

Foliage  Injury  by  the  Lime-sulfur-nicotine-sidfate  Combination.  —  A 
comparison  of  the  effects  from  the  use  of  full  dormant-season  strength 
lime-sulfur  alone  and  in  combination  with  nicotine  sulfate  on  apple  foli- 
age in  various  stages  of  development  from  the  first  splitting  of  the  buds 
to  a  development  of  an  inch  or  more  showed  no  noticeable  difference. 
Even  at  the  latter  period  of  development  the  amount  of  foliage  injury 
was  not  serious. 


TREATMENT   FOR   CONTROL   OF   APPLE    APHIDS.       55 

Efficiency  of  Miscible  Oils  against  the  Aphids.  —  Tests  against  the  living 
aphids  with  two  brands  of  proprietary  miscible  oils  showed  a  killing 
efficiency  of  100  per  cent,  for  each  of  these. 

Action  of  Miscible  Oils  upon  the  Aphids.  —  The  killing  action  of  miscible 
oils  upon  the  aphids  seems  to  be  almost  instantaneous.  In  fact  on  twigs 
examined  shortly  after  dipping  no  movement  of  the  aphids  could  be 
noticed.    The  action  is  evidently  of  a  strictly  chemical  nature. 

Foliage  Injury  by  Miscible  Oils.  —  While  spraying  with  miscible  oils 
for  the  control  of  San  Jos6  scale  is  usually  confined  to  the  dormant  or 
late  dormant  season,  our  tests  would  indicate  that  this  material,  if  perfect, 
can  be  used  at  full  dormant-season  strength  during  the  delayed  dormant 
period  with  no  more  injurj'  to  the  foliage  than  results  from  the  use  of 
lime-sulfur.  At  this  period  in  tests  conducted  both  in  the  laboratory  and 
in  the  field  onty  sHght  tip  injury  resulted;  but  where  the  fohage  had 
developed  to  three-fourths  of  an  inch  or  more,  the  injury  from  the  use  of 
the  miscible  oils  seemed  to  be  shghtly  greater  than  that  resulting  from 
the  lime-sulfur  treatment.  Even  this  was  not  serious  and  was  readily 
overcome  as  the  season  advanced.  From  the  foregoing  it  is  evident  that 
where  the  use  of  miscible  oils  for  orchard  sprajdng  is  practiced  the  most 
economical  time  for  application  is  during  the  delaj^ed  dormant  period, 
when  one  application  will  serve  for  both  the  San  Jos6  scale  treatment  and 
aphid  control. 

Conclusions. 

1.  The  delayed  dormant  period  is  usually  indicative  of  the  complete 
hatching  of  apple  aphid  eggs.  At  this  time  the  buds  have  expanded 
from  a  quarter  to  a  half  inch. 

2.  Lime-sulfur  solution  at  full  dormant-season  strength  is  less  than 
10  per  cent,  effective  against  the  living  aphids  when  applied  at  the  de- 
layed dormant  period. 

3.  Lime-sulfur  applied  at  the  late  dormant  period,  before  the  buds 
split  open  and  just  before  the  hatching  of  the  aphid  eggs,  appears  to  be 
highly  effective,  under  favorable  conditions,  in  destroying  the  eggs,  but 
the  elements  of  thoroughness  of  application  and  unfavorable  meteoro- 
logical conditions  present  such  unoertainty  as  to  results  that  this  treat- 
ment can  hardly  be  recommended  as  an  effective  control. 

4.  If  lime-sulfur  is  to  be  used  as  a  control  for  San  Jose  scale  and  no 
special  treatment  for  apple  aphids  is  to  be  made  later,  best  results  against 
aphids,  if  present,  are  likely  to  be  obtained  by  a  late  dormant-season 
application  just  before  the  eggs  hatch.  Treatment  at  this  time  should 
also  be  thoroughly  effective  against  the  scale. 

5.  The  appUcation  of  the  lime-sulfur  (1  to  8)  and  nicotine  sulfate 
(i  to  800)  combination  applied  at  the  delayed  dormant  period  gives 
practicallj^  a  perfect  control  for  apple  aphids  and  makes  unnecessary  a 
separate  earher  appHcation  of  lime-sulfur  for  San  Jose  scale.    The  per- 


56  MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN   184. 

centage  of  efficiency  will  depend  mainly  upon  thoroughness  of  applica- 
tion. 

6.  The  ordinary  dormant-season  treatment  of  apple  orchards  with 
miscible  oil  against  San  Jose  scale,  if  applied  thoroughly  at  the  delayed 
dormant  period,  should  result  in  practically  a  perfect  control  of  apple 
aphids  also. 

7.  Delayed  dormant  appUcations  of  full  dormant-season  strength  hme- 
sulfur,  lime-sulfur  and  nicotine  sulfate  combined,  and  miscible  oils,  if 
perfect,  can  be  made  without  material  injury  to  apple  foliage.  Even 
when  the  foliage  is  considerably  more  advanced,  little  severe  injury 
usually  results.  This  fact,  if  taken  into  account,  might  make  unnecessary 
separate  appUcations  for  early  and  late  budding  varieties.  As  the  foliage 
becomes  more  advanced,  however,  the  success  of  the  treatment  involves 
greater  difficulty,  since  the  aphids  are  very  difficult  to  reach  when  they 
have  the  spreading  leaves  for  protection. 

8.  The  action  of  lime-sulfur  in  destroying  both  the  aphid  eggs  and 
living  insects  appears  to  be  mainly  mechanical,  by  sticking  them  to  the 
twigs. 

9.  The  action  of  nicotine  sulfate  in  killing  the  living  aphids  is  slow, 
requiring  from  about  half  an  hour  to  twenty-four  hours  or  more  for  different 
individuals.    Death  appears  to  be  due  to  paralysis. 

10.  Miscible  oils  are  practically  instantaneous  in  their  killing  action 
against  the  Hving  aphids.    The  action  is  probably  of  a  chemical  nature. 

Acknowledgments.  <, 

The  writer  is  greatly  indebted  to  Mr.  A.  I.  Bourne  of  the  Massachu- 
setts Agricultural  Experiment  Station  staff  for  assistance  in  carrying  out 
the  insecticide  tests,  and  to  Dr.  H.  T.  Fernald  for  his  kind  suggestions 
and  assistance. 

Bibliography. 

1908.     Gillette,  C.  P.,  and  Taylor,  E.  P.     "Orchard  Plant  Lice  and  Their  Reme- 
dies."    Bulletin  134,  Colorado  Agricultural  Experiment  Station. 

1910.  Wallace,  E.     "Spray  Injury  Induced  by  Lime-sulfur  Preparations."     Bul- 

letin 288,  Cornell  University  Agricultural  Experiment  Station. 

1911.  Shafer,  G.  D.     "How  Contact  Insecticides  Kill."     Technical  Bulletin  11, 

Michigan  Agricultural  Experiment  Station. 

1914.  Tartar,  H.  V.    "On  the  Valuation  of  Lime-sulfur  as  an  Insecticide."    Journal 

of  Economic  Entomology,  Vol.  VII.,  p.  463. 

1915.  Parrott,  P.  J.,  and  Hodgkiss,  H.  E.    "The  Status  of  Spraying  Practices  for 

the  Control  of  Plant  Lice  in  Apple  Orchards."    Bulletin  402,  New  York 
Agricultural  Experiment  Station,  Geneva,  N.  Y. 

1915.  Shafer,  G.  D.     "How  Contact  Insecticides  Kill."     Technical  Bulletin  21, 

Michigan  Agricultural  Experiment  Station. 

1916.  Mclndoo,  N.  E.    "Effects  of  Nicotine  as  an  Insecticide."    Journal  of  Agri- 

cultural Research,  Vol.  VII.,  No.  3,  p.  89,  United  States  Department  of 
Agriculture. 


TREATMENT   FOR   CONTROL   OF    APPLE    APHIDS.      57 

1916.  Parrott,  P.  J.,  Hodgkiss,  H.  E.,  and  Lathrop,  F.  H.     "Apple  Aphids  and 

Their  Control."     Bulletin  415,  New  York  Agricultural  Experiment  Sta- 
tion, Geneva,  N.  Y. 

1917.  Quaintance,  A.  L.,  and  Baker,  A.  C.    "Aphids  Injurious  to  Orchard  Fruits, 

Currant,  Gooseberry  and  Grape."     Farmers'  Bulletin  804,  United  States 
Department  of  Agriculture. 

1917.  Parrott,  P.  J.,  Hodgkiss,  H.  E.,  and  Lathrop,  F.  H.     "Plant  Lice  Injurious 

to  Apple  Orchards"  (II.).    Bulletin  4.31,  New  York  Agricultural  Experi- 
ment Station,  Geneva,  N.  Y. 

1918.  Thayer,  P.     "Delayed  Applications  of  Lime-sulphur."     Monthly  Bulletin, 

Ohio  Agricultural  Experiment  Station,  Vol.  III.,  No.  3,  p.  82. 


BULLETIN  ]Sro.  185. 


DEPARTMENT   OF  HORTICULTURE. 


THE    INHERITANCE    OF   SEED    COAT    COLOR 
IN    GARDEN   BEANS. 


BY  J.   K,   SHAW  AND  JOHN  B.   NORTON. 


Introduction. 


Investigation  of  inheritance  in  garden  beans  at  this  station  was  begun 
in  1907  by  Mr.  C.  S.  Pomeroy,  then  assistant  horticulturist,  who  made 
several  crosses  during  that  summer  and  grew  the  Fi  generation  in  1908. 
Additional  crosses  were  made  during  the  same  summer.  In  the  fall  of 
1908  this  crossed  seed  and  that  of  the  Fi  generation  above  referred  to  fell 
into  the  hands  of  the  senior  writer,  who  has  been  responsible  for  the  con- 
duct of  the  investigations  since.  In  the  summer  of  1913  the  junior  author 
came  into  the  work  and  has  since  borne  a  large  share.  During  all  this 
time  Prof.  F.  A.  Waugh  has  had  general  supervision,  and  his  helpful 
criticisms  and  suggestions  made  from  time  to  time  are  gratefully  ac- 
knov/ledged. 

Review  of  Literature. 

A  number  of  investigators  have  given  time  to  the  study  of  the  in- 
heritance of  seed  coat  color  in  beans.  Mendel  (1)  after  his  classical  experi- 
ments with  peas  gave  some  attention  to  beans,  but  he  discovered  little 
beyond  the  fact  that  he  had  here  a  more  complex  problem  than  that  pre- 
sented by  peas,  and  he  was  not  able  to  apply  the  simple  3:1  formula  to 
explain  his  results. 

Emerson  (2)  made  many  crosses  of  different  horticultural  varieties,  and 
observed  among  other  things  the  behavior  of  seed  coat  color.  He  con- 
sidered that  the  mottled  offspring  exliibited  characters  not  visible  in  either 
parent.  In  a  later  paper  (3)  the  same  author  gives  the  numbers  of  seeds 
resulting  from  a  cross  of  a  dark  brown  and  a  yellow  brown,  and  from  a 
cross  of  a  black  and  a  white  variety.  The  results  of  these  crosses  were 
similar  to  those  of  Burpee  Stringless,  Giant  Stringless,  Challenge  Black 
Wax  and  White  Marrow. 


60         MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    185. 

Further  investigation  showed  Emerson  that  the  theory  of  mosaics 
could  not  explain  the  behavior  of  mottled  beans  resulting  from  crosses  of 
non-mottled  parents,  and  he  advanced  (4)  a  theory  suggested  by  Shull, 
which  supposed  one  factor  was  responsible  for  mottling  in  fixed  races  and 
a  different  factor  responsible  for  mottling  in  heterozygous  forms  mentioned 
above,  which  is  visible  in  heterozygous  individuals  only. 

In  another  paper  (5)  Emerson  discusses  this  theory,  and  develops 
another  theory  suggested  by  Spillman,  which  supposes  mottling  to  be 
due  to  two  factors  which  may  exist  separately  in  the  heterozygous  mottled 
forms  or  coupled  in  those  forms  which  breed  true  to  the  mottled  characters. 
By  this  theory  the  facts  reported  in  the  present  paper  may  be  explained. 

Tschermak  carried  on  numerous  investigations  of  the  inheritance  of 
seed  coat  color  in  beans  along  with  others  with  stocks  and  peas.  In  his 
most  recent  paper  (22)  he  analyzes  his  results,  and  is  able  to  account  for 
most  of  them  in  a  satisfactory  fashion  by  means  of  simple  Mendelian 
factors. 

Shull  (17)  advanced  the  hypothesis  of  the  appearance  of  the  mottling 
factor  only  in  heterozygous  individuals  referred  to  above. 

Kajanus  (13)  reports  investigations  of  the  inheritance  of  colors  and  color 
patterns  in  garden  beans,  especially  of  the  behavior  of  a  violet  marbled 
type  of  mottling  due  apparently  to  distinct  factors.  He  reports  also  on 
the  chemical  nature  of  the  pigments  involved. 

Jarvis  (11)  and  Tracy  (19)  have  given  excellent  descriptions  and  a  quite 
stable  nomenclature  of  common  bean  varieties,  and  Freeman  (7)  describes 
several  types  of  the  Mexican  frijoles  and  teparies,  P.  acutifolnis  var. 
latifolius. 

Methods. 

At  first,  commercial  seed  procured  from  the  trade  was  used,  but  begin- 
ning in  1909  steps  were  taken  to  breed  pure  races,  and  earlier  crosses  made 
with  plants  grown  from  commercial  seed  were,  so  far  as  possible,  repeated. 
Evidence  indicated  that  a  few  of  these  earlier  parents  were  probably 
hybrids,  and  such  crosses  have  been  ignored  in  the  consideration  of  results. 
In  all  cases  the  plants  used  for  crossing  have  been  externally  true  to  type, 
but  as  will  appear  later,  it  is  probable  that  in  some  varieties  two  or  more 
races  have  been  encountered.  In  such  cases  no  external  differences  have 
been  observed  in  the  parent  plants,  though  their  behavior  on  crossing 
revealed  different  genetic  composition. 

In  making  the  crosses  the  procedure  of  Emerson  has  been  generally 
followed;  that  is,  emasculation  and  pollination  have  been  performed  in 
one  operation.  This  method  has  given  sometimes  30  per  cent,  or  more  of 
successful  attempts,  and  at  other  times  a  very  low  percentage  of  successes. 
This  is  probably  due  in  part  to  unfavorable  environmental  conditions,  and 
in  part  to  variations  in  the  procedure,  —  usually  the  selection  of  a  female 
blossom  that  was  not  sufficiently  mature.  In  a  few  cases  the  resulting 
plants  have  been  like  the  female  parent,  indicating  that  self-fertilization 


SEED    COAT   COLOR   IN   GARDEN   BEANS.  61 

had  taken  place  before  the  foreign  pollen  was  introduced,  or  at  least  before 
it  could  take  effect.  Some  of  the  crossing  was  done  in  the  field  and  some 
in  the  greenhouse  during  the  winter.  In  the  latter  case  the  blossoms  were 
not  covered,  while  in  the  former  a  one-fourth  pound  manilla  bag  was  tied 
tightly  ov'er  the  flower  stalk  for  five  or  six  days,  after  which  it  was  torn 
open,  and,  if  the  attempt  seemed  successful,  left  to  indicate  the  seed  pod 
at  the  time  of  harvest. 

In  all  cases  four  generations  from  the  cross  have  been  grown.  In  each 
generation  except  the  fourth  a  certain  number  of  plants  chosen  more  or 
less  at  random  have  been  self-fertilized  by  enclosing  them  during  the 
blossoming  period  in  cheesecloth  or,  in  a  few  cases,  waxed  paper  sacks. 
Neither  of  these  is  satisfactory.  Both  weaken  the  plant,  the  waxed  paper 
sacks  more  than  the  cheesecloth  ones.  It  has  been  the  invariable  observa- 
tion that  there  is  a  progressive  weakening  of  the  plants  through  the  four 
generations.  First  generation  crosses  are  invariably  strong,  vigorous 
plants,  often  seemingly  more  vigorous  than  the  parent  varieties,  while  the 
fourth  generation  plants  are  decidedly  weak  and  unproductive.  Whether 
this  is  due  to  the  repeated  self-fertilization  or  to  the  weakening  effect  of 
covering  the  plants  does  not  appear.  Possibly  both  have  contributed  to 
the  result  observed. 

The  blossoms  have  been  more  or  less  infested  with  thrips.  None  have 
been  observed  on  covered  plants,  but  it  is  entirely  possible  that  there 
may  have  been  cases  of  such  infestation,  and  that  in  rare  cases  a  grain  of 
foreign  pollen  was  introduced  in  the  blossom  of  a  plant  supposed  to  be 
self-fertilized.  A  few  irregularities  that  may  have  been  due  to  such  a 
cause  have  been  observed.  Nevertheless,  the  probability  that  such  cases 
are  extremely  rare  is  indicated  by  a  number  of  considerations.  Bean 
blossoms  are  commonly  self-fertilized  before  they  open,  and,  according 
to  our  observation,  thrips  does  not  infest  unopened  buds.  The  pollen- 
carrying  ability  of  thrips  cannot  be  large,  and  it  appears  that  it  does 
not  commonly  enter  beneath  the  bags,  or  it  would  have  been  observed 
in  the  many  examinations  of  the  covered  plants.  And  finally,  cases 
arousing  suspicion  of  the  entrance  of  foreign  pollen  are  extremely  rare. 

Recording  Data. 
The  method  of  securing  records  of  the  plants  has  been  previously 
described  (16).  It  consists,  essentially,  in  assigning  to  the  expression  of 
each  supposed  Mendelian  character  a  special  letter  designation.  The 
plants  have  been  examined  for  blossom  color,  pod  color,  and  for  seed 
coat  color.  This  involves  going  over  the  plants  not  less  than  three  times, 
and  in  most  cases  two  examinations  have  been  made  for  each  character, 
involving  examination  of  the  plants  six  times.  In  order  to  identify  the 
individual  plants,  each  is  assigned  a  number  in  order.  The  seeds  are 
planted  about  6  inches  apart,  and  a  small  tag  bearing  its  number  is  early 
attached  to  every  fifth  plant.    Thus,  in  order  to  ascertain  the  number  of 


62 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    185. 


any  plant,  one  has  to  examine  only  a  very  few  plants  along  the  row  before 
finding  one  bearing  a  tag  with  its  number.  Wlien  any  plant  is  self-fertilized 
the  fact  is  noted  on  the  card  along  with  the  rest  of  the  record  for  that 
plant.  A  record  of  J:he  original  crosses  is  kept  so  that  one  may  trace 
readily  the  ancestry  of  any  individual  plant  back  to  the  original  parents. 

As  soon  as  the  seed  was  well  matured  a  Sngle  bean  from  each  plant 
representative  of  those  on  that  plant  has  been  selected  and  preserved. 
Unfortunately  mice  gained  access  to  a  portion  of  these  seed  samples  and 
destroyed  many  of  them.  Still,  samples  representing  a  majority  of  the 
plants  grown  escaped  destruction  and  are  available  for  examination. 
Many  of  the  pigments  found  in  the  seed  coats  are  subject  to  change  with 
age,  and  due  allowance  must  be  made  in  the  study  of  old  seed. 

It  has  been  said  that  an  attempt  was  made  in  recording  observations 
to  designate  the  expression  of  each  independent  character  by  a  separate 
letter.  The  letter  used,  the  color  which  each  stands  for,  and  the  name 
of  a  variety  bearing  each  color  character  are  as  follows :  — 


Seed  Coat  Color. 

A. 

White, 

B. 

Buff, 

C. 

Yellow,      . 

D. 

Medium  or  bright  red 

E. 

Dark  or  purplish  red, 

F. 

Coffee  brown,     . 

G. 

Black, 

H. 

Olive, 

L. 

Eyedness, 

O. 

Dark  mottled,    . 

P. 

Light  mottled,    . 

Flower. 

A. 

White, 

B. 

Light  pink, 

C. 

Pink, 

D. 

Crimson,   . 

E. 

Waxy  pink. 

Found  in  — 
Davis  Wax. 
Blue  Pod  Butter. 
Giant  Stringless. 
Red  Valentine. 
Mohawk. 
Burpee  Stringless. 
Challenge  Black  Wax. 
Certain  crosses. 
All  eyed  beans. 
Red  Valentine. 
Golden  Carmine. 


All  white  and  eyed  sorts. 
Burpee  Stringless. 
All  black  seed  sorts. 
Blue  Pod  Butter. 
Certain  crosses. 


The  first  eight  letters  stand  for  separate  and  quite  distinct  colors,  most 
of  which  may  be  found  in  one  or  more  of  the  varieties  used.  The  color  H 
does  not  appear  in  any  of  the  varieties  used,  but  does  appear  in  several 
of  the  crosses.  Attempts  have  been  made  to  distinguish  different  eye 
sizes  in  eyed  beans.  There  is  no  doubt  that  eye  size  is  inherited,  but  the 
data  secured  do  not  appear  clear  and  definite  enough  to  warrant  any 
positive  conclusions;  therefore  only  a  brief  general  report  on  different 
eye  sizes  is  made. 

Mottled  beans  are  of  two  distinct  kinds,  —  one,  designated  as  "dark 
mottled,"  includes  those  sorts  where  the  darker  color  or  colors  predomi- 
nate, of  which  there  are  many  varieties  other  than  Red  Valentine,  the 


SEED  COAT  COLOR  IN  GARDEN  BEANS. 


63 


one  cited;  the  other,  called  "light  mottled/'  includes  those  varieties  of 
the  Horticultural  type.  The  different  blossom  colors  have  been  more 
fully  explained  in  a  previous  publication  (15). 


Varieties  used. 

During  the  eight  years  that  the  investigations  have  been  in  progress 
twenty-one  varieties  have  been  used  in  the  crosses  yielding  results  deemed 
worthy  of  consideration.  A  few  others  have  been  used  in  a  very  limited 
way.  Including  reciprocals,  more  than  120  different  crosses  have  been 
made,  some  of  which  have  been  repeated  two  or  three  times. 

The  principal  varieties  used,  their  blossom  and  seed  coat  color,  and  the 
letters  used  to  designate  them,  are  as  follows :  — 


Variety. 

Blossom. 

Seed  Coat. 

Color. 

Letter. 

Color. 

Letter. 

Black  Valentine,     . 

Pink 

C 

Black 

G 

Blue  Pod  Butter,    . 

Crimson, 

D 

Buff 

B 

Bountiful, 

Pink,    . 

C 

Greenish  buff, 

B 

Burpee  Kidney, 

White,  . 

A 

Red  mottled  eye. 

EOL 

Burpee  Stringless,  . 

Light  pink,  . 

B 

Coffee  brown. 

F 

Challenge  Black  Wax,     . 

Pink,    . 

C 

Black 

G 

Creaseback,     . 

White,  . 

A 

White 

A 

Currie,     .         .         .         . 

Pink,    . 

C 

Black 

G 

Davis  Wax, 

White.  . 

A 

White 

A 

German  Black  Wax, 

Pink,    . 

C 

Black 

G 

Giant  Stringless,     . 

Light  pink,  . 

B 

Yellow, 

C 

Golden  Carmine,    . 

Light  pink. 

B 

Light  mottled,     . 

EP 

Golden  Eyed  Wax, 

White,  . 

A 

Yellow  eyed, 

CL 

Keeney  Rustless,    . 

White,  . 

A 

Dark  red  eyed  mottled, 

EOL 

Longfellow, 

Light  pink. 

B 

Red  mottled. 

DO 

Low  Champion, 

Light  pink,  . 

D 

Red 

D 

Mohawk, 

Light  pink, 

B 

Dark  red  mottled. 

EO 

Prolific  Black  Wax, 

Pink,    . 

C 

Black 

G 

Red  Valentine, 

White,  . 

A 

Red  mottled. 

DO 

Wardwell, 

White,  . 

A 

Dark  red  mottled  eye. 

EOL 

Warren,   .        .        .        . 

Light  pink,  . 

B 

Dark  red,     . 

E 

Warwick, 

Light  pink,  . 

B 

Red  mottled, 

DO 

White  Marrow, 

White,  . 

A 

White 

A 

The  nomenclature  is  according  to  Jarvis  (11),  and  for  a  full  description 
of  the  several  varieties  the  reader  is  referred  to  his  paper  or  that  of  Tracy 
(19). 


64         MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    185. 

An  examination  of  the  above  table  reveals  several  more  or  less  constant 
correlations  between  blossom  color  and  seed  coat  color.  All  white  or 
eyed  beans  are  accompanied  by  white  blossoms.  So  far  as  the  knowledge 
of  the  writers  goes  this  is  always  true,  unless  it  may  be  in  some  cases  of 
eyed  beans,  when  the  eye  is  unusually  large.  With  this  reservation  no 
certain  exceptions  have  been  observed  among  either  commercial  varieties 
or  the  crosses  made.  With  the  exception  of  Red  Valentine,  all  totally 
pigmented  or  mottled  beans  show  more  or  less  color  in  the  blossom.  A 
few  plants  in  certain  lots  of  Red  Valentine  have  shown  slight  color  in  the 
blossom,  while  in  other  lots  a  careful  examination  showed  no  colored 
flowers.  As  is  shown  later,  more  than  one  strain  of  Red  Valentine  has  been 
encountered,  and  this  may  account  for  the  occasional  appearance  of 
slightly  tinged  flowers.  There  are  a  number  of  commercial  varieties 
having  pigmented  seeds  and  white  flowers. 

In  these  varieties  black  beans  and  pink  flowers  alwaj^s  go  together,  and 
this  seems  to  be  generally  the  case  among  commercial  varieties  whether 
the  bean  is  solid  black  or  black  mottled,  unless  the  mottling  is  confined  to 
a  distinct  e3^e.  Our  records  show  a  number  of  instances  where  a  black  or 
black  mottled  bean  is  said  to  have  been  accompanied  by  a  white  flower, 
but  such  cases  are  very  few  among  manj'  where  the  flower  is  pink,  and 
we  are  inclined  to  ascribe  them  to  erroneous  observations,  usually  of  blos- 
som color.  Certain  pigmentation  of  the  plant  as  a  whole  seems  to  accom- 
pany certain  blossom  colors.  The  crimson  flower  of  Blue  Pod  Butter  is 
alwaj^s  accompanied  by  a  deep  purplish  coloration  of  the  entire  plant.  It 
is  probable  that  the  factor  producing  the  pink  flower  and  black  coloration 
in  the  seed  coat  always  causes  also  fine  purplish  lines  on  the  stems  and 
possibly  a  darker  foliage  than  is  found  in  non-pigmented  plants. 

Pod  color  is  undoubtedly  independent  of  other  coloration  of  the  plant, 
except  that  green  podded  plants  have  slightly  darker  green  foliage  than 
wax  podded  varieties. 

The  purplish  coloration  characteristic  of  the  foliage  of  Blue  Pod  Butter, 
found  also  in  crosses  when  it  is  one  of  the  parents,  extends  to  the  seed  pods 
whether  they  are  green  podded  or  wax  podded.  In  many  cases  a  more  or 
less  obscure  reddish  or  crimson  splashing  appears  on  the  outside  of  the 
seed  pod.  This  is  frequently,  but  apparentlj^  not  always,  associated  with 
mottled  seeds.  It  is  clearly  seen  in  varieties  of  the  Horticultural  class. 
Often  it  does  not  show  until  the  pod  is  about  to  ripen,  and  disappears 
with  complete  maturity.  On  account  of  these  facts  it  has  been  found  dif- 
ficult to  secure  accurate  data  bearing  on  the  genetic  behavior  of  this 
character.  Moreover,  our  attention  has  been  directed  more  especially  to 
other  characters.  Our  observations  indicate  that  it  is  a  character  worthy 
of  more  careful  study  directed  especially  upon  this  point. 

As  has  been  previously  intimated,  the  inheritance  of  pigmentation  in 
beans  is  exceedingly  complicated.  Many  independent  factors  are  involved, 
and  through  various  interrelations  of  these,  varied  colors  and  color  pat- 
terns are  produced.  These  colors  and  color  patterns  are  not  limited  in 
number  to  the  letter  designations  given.    To  put  it  in  another  way,  many 


SEED  COAT  COLOR  IN  GARDEN  BEANS.      65 

of  the  letters  have  been  used  to  designate  more  than  one  color,  or  colors, 
of  different  genetic  origin,  but  alwaj^s  similar  colors,  and  usually  those 
that  on  first  encountering  we  could  not  certainly  differentiate.  For  ex- 
ample, the  B  seed  colors  of  Blue  Pod  Butter  and  Bountiful  are  similar 
in  appearance,  but  of  entirely  different  genetic  constitution,  and  can  be 
with  some  difficulty  distinguished  from  each  other  in  the  field.  It  has 
been  the  aim  to  use  a  given  letter  within  a  given  cross  always  for  the  same 
color  character,  and  it  is  thought  that  this  has  been  usually  successful. 

The  appearance  of  pigment  in  the  seed  coat  of  beans  is  usually  the  ex- 
pression of  a  complex  factor  or  the  concurrence  of  several  factors.  In  the 
absence  of  any  one  of  the  elements  of  this  factor  complex  the  beans  are 
unpigmented.  If  this  be  the  case,  crosses  of  non-pigmented  beans  may 
give  rise  to  pigmented  offspring.  One  such  cross  has  been  encountered  in 
this  work,  that  of  Davis  Wax  X  Michigan  White  Wax.  This  does  not 
signify  that  such  crosses  are  rare,  for  only  three  have  been  made  in  the 
course  of  this  work,  the  other  two,  Creaseback  X  Burpee's  Fordhook 
Favorite,  and  Wliite  Marrow  X  Burpee  White  Wax,  yielding  only  non- 
pigmented  offspring.  As  previously  reported,  numerous  crosses  of  plants 
bearing  white  flowers  have  given  rise  to  plants  with  pigmented  flowers, 
but  all  these  have  been  accompanied  by  pigmented  seeds.  Had  the  pos- 
sible results  from  intercrossing  non-pigmented  beans  been  realized  from 
the  first  a  much  larger  number  of  such  crosses  would  have  been  attempted. 

Crosses  of  Pigmented  with  Non-pigmented  Beans, 

We  have  a  white-coated  bean  whenever  one  or  more  elements  of  the 
factor  complex  for  pigmentation  are  absent,  and  crosses  of  such  plants 
with  pigmented  plants  have  shown  dominance  of  pigmentation.  The  pro- 
portions of  pigmented  and  non-pigmented  beans  in  the  F2  generation 
have  been  approximately  3:1,  yet  most  crosses  show  departures  from  this 
ratio  that,  in  view  of  the  large  numbers  involved,  may  be  significant. 
These  results  are  shown  in  Table  I.  In  some  crosses  there  is  an  excess  of 
pigmented  beans  and  in  others  a  deficiency.  We  have  been  unable  to 
settle  upon  any  theory  that  will  explain  in  detail  these  seeming  irregu- 
larities. If  the  non-pigmented  parent  lacks  more  than  one  element  of 
the  pigment  complex  an  excess  of  non-pigmented  beans  in  F2  would 
result,  —  an  explanation  of  the  observed  excess  of  white  beans  that  may 
or  may  not  be  correct.  It  is  possible  that  the  excess  of  pigmented  beans 
might  be  explained  on  the  basis  of  a  complex  pigmentation  factor  were  it 
thoroughly  understood,  but  we  are  unable  at  present  to  offer  adequate 
explanation  of  all  the  departures  from  a  3:1  ratio  that  have  been  observed. 

Some  of  the  crosses  involving  Creaseback  show  very  great  departures 
from  a  3:1  ratio.  In  97a  and  331a  the  number  of  white  beans  is  very  few. 
Both  these  must  be  crosses,  for  Creaseback  is  a  pole  bean,  and  pole  beans 
have  appeared  in  considerable  numbers  in  97a,  and  most  of  the  beans  in 
331a  were  entirely  unhke  Warwick,  the  female  parent.  This  behavior  of 
Creaseback  will  be  more  fully  discussed  later. 


66 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    185. 


Table  I.  —  Crosses  of  Pigmented  rvi 

,h  Non-Tpigmented  Beans. 

Cross 
No. 

Parent  Varieties. 

F2. 

Fa  and  F4  (Pig- 
mented 
Parents  only). 

33 

Blue  Pod  Butter  (P)  X  White  Marrow  (\V),  . 

Pigmented. 

77 

W^ite. 
35 

Pigmented. 
410 

White. 
157 

34 

White  Marrow  (W)  X  Blue  Pod  Butter  (P),  . 

57 

23 

87 

38 

Totals 

134 

58 

497 

195 

Ratios, 

2.31 

2.55 

/ 

67 

Burpee  Stringless  (P)  X  White  Marrow  (W).  . 

54 

17 

302 
68 

93 

68 

White  Marrow  (W)  X  Burpee  Stringless  (P),  . 

46 

14 

175 

61 

Totals, 

100 

31 

477 

154 

Ratios, 

s.n 

3.10 

1 

129 

Currie  (P)  X  White  Marrow  (W),    . 

122 

49 

1.59 
57 

59 

Ratios 

249 

2.70 

/ 

184 

White  Marrow  (W)  X  German  Black  Wax  (P), 

84 

32 

22 
3 

6 

Ratios 

Z.6S 

3.67 

/ 

230 

White  Marrow  (W)  X  Golden  Carmine  (P),  . 

12 

13 
110 

3 

Ratios, 

1.71 

Jf.33 

/ 

249 

Golden  Eyed  Wax  (P)  X  White  Marrow  (W), 

118 

36 

185 
70 

56 

250 

White  Marrow  (W)  X  Golden  Eyed  Wax  (P), 

18 

129 
63 

27 

Totals 

136 

40 

314 

83 

Ratios 

S.iO 

3.78 

1 

268 

White  Marrow  (W)  X  Keeney  Rustless  (P),  . 

14 

81 
18 

21 

Ratios, 

2.00 

I 

3.86 

1 

298 

White  Marrow  (W)  X  Prolific  Black  Wax  (P),  . 

33 

11 

63 

28 

Ratios, 

3.00 

2.25 

) 

309 

Red  Valentine  (P)  X  White  Marrow  (W), 

71 

22 

66 

88 

34 

310 

White  Marrow  (W)  X  Red  Valentine  (P),       . 

33 

9 

56 

28 

17 

Totals 

104 

33 

122 

51 

Ratios 

3.15 

/ 

2.39 

/ 

31 

Blue  Pod  Butter  (P)  X  Creaseback  (W), 

144 

65 

520 

134 

32a 

Creaseback  (W)  X  Blue  Pod  Butter  (P), 

5 

3 

26 
11 

1 

32 

Creaseback  (W)  X  Blue  Pod  Butter  (P), 

73 

30 

155 

49 

Ratios 

2.1,3 

/ 

3.16 

/ 

97 

Challenge  Black  Wax  (P)  X  Creaseback  (W), 

145 

37 

238 
136 

65 

Ratios 

3.92 

1 

S.66 

/ 

97o 

Challenge  Black  Wax  (P)  X  Creaseback  (W), 

101 

1 

29 
60 

2 

247 

Golden  Eyed  Wax  (P)  X  Creaseback  (W),      . 

10 

3 

65 
97 

19 

Ratios 

3.33 

/ 

S.i2 

/ 

296 

Creaseback  (W)  X  Prolific  Black  Wax  (P),     . 

2Q 

17 

- 

- 

Ratios, 

1.53 

/ 

- 

- 

SEED  COAT  COLOR  IN  GARDEN  BEANS. 


67 


Table  I.  —  Crosses  of  Pigmented  ivith  Non-jngmented  Beans  —  Concluded. 


Cross 
No. 


Parent  Varieties. 


F2. 


F3  and  F4  (Pig- 
mented 
Parents  only). 


331 

331a 

332 


Warwick  (P)  X  Creaseback  (W), 

Warwick  (P)  X  Creaseback  (W), 

Creaseback  (W)  X  Warwick  (P), 

Totals  (omitting  331a), 

Ratios 

Challenge  Black  Wax  (P)  X  Davis  Wax  ( 
Ratios, 


m, 


Pigmented.  White. 
30  9 


38 
48 
78 
S. 
243 


Pigmented.  White. 

7 
27 
131 
104 


103 
110 


242 
329 


The  Inheritance  of  Pigment  Patterns. 

The  disposition  of  pigments  over  the  surface  of  the  bean  may  be  even, 
in  which  case  we  call  it  self-colored;  or  the  pigments  may  be  irregularly 
disposed,  revealing  the  separate  colors  in  short  stripes  or  splashes,  when 
we  have  a  mottled  bean.  The  mottling  or  the  self-color  may  be  limited 
to  a  more  or  less  well-defined  area  around  the  hilum,  giving  us  an  eyed 
bean.  These  tw^o  pigment  patterns,  mottling  and  eyedness,  will  be 
separately  considered. 

Mottlmg. 

There  are  many  varieties  of  beans  with  mottled  seeds.  The  colors 
involved  are  various,  and  the  type  of  mottling  differs  in  different  varieties. 
The  inheritance  of  the  various  colors  is  dealt  with  in  a  later  section.  The 
various  types  of  mottling  are  without  difficulty  separated  into  two  classes, 
—  a  light  mottling  shown  in  various  varieties  of  the  Horticultural  class, 
and  a  dark  mottling  shown  by  Red  Valentine,  Refugee  and  many  others. 
Many  crosses  involving  both  types  of  mottling  have  been  made,  and  the 
mottling  always  breeds  true.  There  are  also  many  crosses  where  only 
non-mottled  parents  have  yielded  mottled  beans,  both  of  the  light  and 
dark  mottled  types.  But  in  no  case  have  these  mottled  beans  bred  true. 
This  is  in  accord  with  other  investigations,  and  a  theory  to  account  for 
the  facts  has  been  set  forth  by  Emerson  (4)  on  the  suggestion  of  Spillman. 
This  theory  supposes  that  mottling  is  brought  about  by  two  factors, 

Y  and  Z,  which  are  coupled  in  the  case  of  true-breeding  mottled  varieties, 
but  may  be  separately  borne  by  distinct  varieties,  and  in  such  cases  are 
inherited  independently.     Individuals  from  such  crosses  bearing  both 

Y  and  Z  are  mottled  and  always  heterozygous,  while  those  bearing  either 
one  are  not  mottled.  Whether  or  not  this  is  the  final  and  complete  ex- 
planation of  mottling  in  beans,  it  serves  to  exi^lain  the  results  thus  far 
obtained. 

The  following  crosses  of  mottled  beans  have  bred  true,  yielding  only 
mottled  progeny:  — 


68 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    185. 


Cross 
No. 


Parent  Varieties. 


Total 

Number  of 

Progeny. 


215 

258 
262 
273 
274 


Golden  Carmine  X  Mohawk, 
Red  Valentine  X  Keeney  Rustless, 
Wardwell  X  Keeney  Rustless, 
Mohawk  X  Red  Valentine,  . 
Red  Valentine  X  Mohawk,  . 


77 
109 
168 

78 
281 


Golden  Carmine  is  of  the  light  mottled  type,  and  Keeney  Rustless  and 
Wardwell  are  mottled-eyed  beans;  all  the  others  are  of  the  common 
dark  mottled  type. 

Table  II.  shows  the  results  of  crossing  mottled  and  self-colored  varieties. 
In  all  such  crosses  the  Fi  generation  has  yielded  only  mottled  beans. 
The  r2  generation  has  been  composed  of  mottled  and  self-colored  beans 
in  proportions  approximating  3:1,  though  rather  wide  departures  will  be 
noted.  These  departures  are  subject  to  the  same  comments  as  those  in 
crosses  of  pigmented  and  non-pigmented  beans  shown  in  Table  I.  All 
extracted  self-colored  beans  have  bred  true  and  mottled  beans  have 
proved  homozygous  in  mottling  in  some  cases  and  heterozygous  in  others, 
as  shown  in  the  table.  None  of  the  mottled  varieties  in  this  table  are  of 
the  light  or  Horticultural  type.  Wardwell  and  Keeney  Rustless  have 
mottled  eyes.  Golden  Eyed  Wax  has  a  self-colored  eye,  while  the  other 
self-colored  varieties  are  totally  pigmented  and  of  various  colors. 

Table  II.  —  Crosses  of  Mottled  until  Self-colored  Beans. 


Cross 
No. 

Parent  Varieties. 

Fi. 

F3  and  Fj. 

19 

Blue  Pod  Butter  (S)  X  Mohawk  (M),   . 

Mottled. 
8 

Self. 

Mottled. 
55 
43 

Self. 
21 

20 

Mohawk  fM)  X  Blue  Pod  Butter  (S),   . 

7 

1 

- 

Totals 

15 

55 

21 

Ratios, 

S.75 

2.62 

:      / 

23 

Blue  Pod  Butter  (S)  X  Red  Valentine  (M), 

23 

26 
15 

9 

Ratios, 

3.29 

2.89 

:      1 

29 

Blue  Pod  Butter  (S)  X  Warwick  (M),  . 

38 

10 

90 
157 

37 

30 

Warwick  (M)  X  Blue  Pod  Butter  (S),   . 

106 

51 

16 
109 

3 

Totals,       . 

144 

61 

106 

40 

Ratios 

2.3G 

2.65 

:      / 

54 

Mohawk  (M)  X  Burpee  Stringless  (S), 

24 

54 

- 

57 

Burpee  Stringless  (S)  X  Red  Valentine  (M), 

32 

13 

82 
8 

24 

58 

Red  Valentine  (M)  X  Burpee  Stringless  (S), 

63 

30 

180 
127 

31 

Totals 

95 

43 

262 

55 

Ratios, 

2. SI 

:      / 

4.76 

:      / 

SEED  COAT  COLOR  IN  GARDEN  BEANS. 


69 


Table  II.  —  Crosses   of  Mottled   with   Self-colored   Beans  —  Concluded. 


Parent  Varieties. 


Fa. 


F3  and  F4. 


Challenge  Black  Wax  (S)  X  Warwick  (M),    . 

Ratios, 

Currie  (S)  X  Mohawk  (M) 

Mohawk  (M)  X  Currie  (S) 

Totals, 

Ratios, 

Currie  (S)  X  Red  Valentine  (M), 
Red  Valentine  (M)  X  Currie  (S), 

Totals 

Ratios, 

Giant  Stringless  (S)  X  Mohawk  (M),    . 
Mohawk  (M)  X  Giant  Stringless  (S),    . 

Totals,       ....... 

Ratios,      ....... 

Giant  Stringless  (S)  X  Red  Valentine  (M), 
Red  Valentine  (M)  X  Giant  Stringless  (S), 

Totals,       ....... 

Ratios, 

Prolific  Black  Wax  (S)  X  Red  Valentine  (M), 
Red  Valentine  (M)  X  Prolific  Black  Wax  (S), 

Totals, 

Ratios,      ....... 

Blue  Pod  Butter  (S)  X  Refugee  (M),    . 

Ratios,      ....... 

Blue  Pod  Butter  (S)  X  Wardwell  (M), 
Wardwell  (M)  X  Blue  Pod  Butter  (S), 

Totals 

Ratios, 

Burpee  Stringless  (S)  X  Wardwell  (M), 

Ratios,      ....... 

Giant  Stringless  (S)  X  Keeney  Rustless  (M), 

Ratios,      ....... 

Giant  Stringless  (S)  X  Wardwell  (M),  . 

Ratios,      ....... 

Wardwell  (M)  X  Golden  Eyed  Wax  (S), 

Ratios,       ....... 

Longfellow  (M)  X  Golden  Eyed  Wax  (S),     . 

Ratios,       ....... 


Mottled. 
34 


158 
20 
178 


116 
287 
403 


27 
180 
207 


10 
35 
45 

3.75 


15 

2.14 
4 

4.00 
42 
2.00 


Self. 
13 

1 

41 

6 

47 

1 

50 

151 

201 

1 

2 

2 

4 

1 

9 

5 

14 

1 

14 

75 

89 


4 
2.00 


Mottled. 
136 
179 
3.61 

68 
12 
26 


117 
201 
77 
176 
194 


54 
53 
107 


95 
122 
136 

72 
231 


23 
12 
1.64 

94 

56 

78 
111 
172 


11 

9 
5.50 

43 
41 

3.31 

81 
55 


44 
18 
2.31 

3 

19 
1.00 


Self. 
52 

/ 
34 

7 
41 

1 
46 
19 
65 

/ 

7 
23 
30 

1 
36 
22 
58 

/ 
28 
47 
75 

1 
14 

/ 
28 
30 
58 

1 

2 

1 
13 

/ 
34 

1 
19 

/ 

3 

1 


70 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION    BULLETIN    185. 


In  cross  54,  Mohawk  X  Burpee  Stringless,  in  the  F3  and  F4  genera- 
tions, 54  plants  jdelcled  only  mottled  beans.  This  is  explained  by  the 
fact  that  only  two  parent  plants  were  involved,  and  both  happened  to  be 
homozygous  for  mottling. 

In  Table  III.  are  shown  the  results  obtained  from  crosses  of  mottled 
and  white  varieties.  In  all  such  crosses  the  Fi  beans  have  been  mottled,, 
and  all  extracted  whites  have  bred  true.  Extracted  self-colored  beans 
have  sometimes  bred  true  and  sometimes  yielded  self-colored  and  white 
in  approximately  a  3:1  ratio,  never  mottled  beans.  As  shown  in  the 
table,  the  usual  result  in  F2  seems  to  be  a  9:3:4  proportion. 


Table  III.  —  Crosses  of  Mottled  with  White  Beans. 


Cross 
No 

Parent  Varieties. 

F2. 

F3    AND   F4 

(Mottled  Par- 
ents only). 

M. 

S. 

W. 

M. 

11 

18 

7 

1 
149 
45 
81 
17 

5 

28 
14 
15 
8 
10 
18 
6 
9 

121 
16 

124 
5 
19 

S. 

W. 

141 

230 

309 

309o 

310 

327 

366 

331 
33I0 

332 

Davis  Wax  (W)  X  Keeney  Rustless  (M), 
White  Marrow  (W)  X  Golden  Carmine  (M),    . 
Red  Valentine  (M)  X  White  Marrow  (W), 
Red  Valentine  (M)  X  White  Marrow  (W), 
White  Marrow  (W)  X  Red  Valentine  (M), 

Ward  well  (M)  X  White  Marrow  (M), 

White  Marrow  (W)  X  Burpee  Kidney  (M),      . 

Warwick  (M)  X  Creaseback  (W),      . 
Warwick  (M)  X  Creaseback  (W),      . 

Creaseback  (W)  X  Warwick  (M),      . 

17 
11 
82 
38 
16 

32 
6 

5 

8 

8 

5 
22 

7 

1 

2 

25 
24 

12 

2 

7 

34 

13 

9 

5 

3 

8 
1 

3 

2 
101 

5 
21 
36 

3 

4 
3 

11 
10 
29 

3 

2 

3 

26 

6 
10 
6 

13 
3 

3 

8 

3 

6 
37 
14 

Cross  141,  Davis  Wax  X  Keeney  Rustless,  jdelded  no  self-colored 
beans.  It  will  be  shown  later  that  Davis  carries  the  coupled  factors  YZ, 
and  as  soon  as  pigment  is  introduced  yields  mottled  beans.  This  being 
true,  and  Keeney  Rustless  also  bearing  YZ,  no  self-colored  beans  can 
appear.  In  cross  309  it  is  evident  that  two  strains  of  White  Marrow 
are  involved,  the  one  in  309a  being  like  Davis  Wax  in  bearing  the 
coupled  YZ,  and  the  other  strain  only  one  of  these  factors,  thus  permitting 
the  appearance  of  self-colored  beans.  In  crosses  331  and  332  there  are 
certain  irregularities  due  to  Creaseback  that  will  be  discussed  later. 

Most  of  our  crosses  among  self-colored  beans  have  yielded  only  self- 
colored  progeny,  no  mottled  or  white  beans  appearing.  A  list  of  such 
crosses  follows:  — 


SEED  COAT  COLOR  IN  GARDEN  BEANS, 


71 


Cross 
No. 

Parent  Varieties. 

Total 
Number  of 

Progeny. 

43 

Burpee  Stringless  (S)  X  German  Black  Wax  (S) 

419 

44 

German  Black  Wax  (S)  X  Burpee  Stringless  (S), 

437 

50 

Golden  Eyed  Wax  (E)  X  Burpee  Stringless  (S), 

410 

55 

Burpee  Stringless  (S)  X  Prolific  Black  Wax  (S), 

75 

81 

Challenge  Black  Wax  (S)  X  Golden  Eyed  Wax  (E), 

459 

87 

Challenge  Black  Wax  (S)  X  Prolific  Black  Wax  (S), 

- 

112 

Golden  Eyed  Wax  (E)  X  Currie  (S),   .... 

879 

189 

Giant  Stringless  (S)  X  Golden  Eved  Wax  (E),   . 

266 

190 

Golden  Eyed  Wax  (E)  X  Giant  Stringless  (S),   . 

213 

237 

Golden  Eyed  Wax  (E)  X  Prolific  Black  Wax  (S), 

419 

346 

Black  Valentine  (S)  X  Prolific  Black  Wax  (S),    . 

108 

349 

Blue  Pod  Butter  (S)  X  Warren  (S),     . 

18 

350 

Bountiful  (S)  X  German  Black  Wax  (S),    . 

11 

351 

Bountiful  (S)  X  Prolific  Black  Wax  (S),      . 

75 

354 

German  Black  Wax  (S)  X  Bountiful  (S),    . 

81 

362 

Prolific  Black  Wax  (S)  X  Bountiful  (S) 

56 

Crosses  of  a  number  of  self-colored  varieties  have  yielded  only  mottled 
individuals  in  Fi,  and  mottled  and  self-colored  individuals  in  Fo,  in  what 
seems  to  be  roughly  a  1:1  proportion.    These  are  shown  in  Table  IV. 


Table  IV.  —  Crosses  of  Self-colorsd  Varieties  yielding  Mottled  Progeny. 


Cross 
No. 

Parent  Varieties. 

F2. 

Fs   AND   F4 

(Mottled  Par- 
ents only). 

M. 

S. 

M. 

S. 

1 

Blue  Pod  Butter  X  Burpee  Stringless,     . 

159 

146 

165 

170 

2 

Burpee  Stringless  X  Blue  Pod  Butter,      . 

78 

88 

28 

22 

Totals 

237 

234 

193 

192 

3 

Blue  Pod  Butter  X  Challenge  Black  Wax, 

36 

39 

25 

30 

4 

Challenge  Black  Wax  X  Blue  Pod  Butter, 

92 

125 

38 

28 

Totals, 

128 

164 

63 

58 

5 

Blue  Pod  Butter  X  German  Black  Wax, 

7 

16 

8 

5 

6 

German  Black  Wax  X  Blue  Pod  Butter, 

48 

27 

26 

35 

Totals, 

55 

43 

34 

40 

11 

Blue  Pod  Butter  X  Giant  Stringless, 

2 

1 

11 

12 

12 

Giant  Stringless  X  Blue  Pod  Butter, 

26 

51 

20 

32 

Totals 

28 

52 

31 

54 

15 

Blue  Pod  Butter  X  Golden  Eyed  Wax, 

20 

22 

10 

11 

16 

Golden  Eyed  Wax  X  Blue  Pod  Butter, 

25 

32 

43 

42 

Totals 

45 

54 

53 

53 

21 

Blue  Pod  Butter  X  Prolific  Black  Wax, 

69 

59 

27 

42 

22 

Prolific  Black  Wax  X  Blue  Pod  Butter, 

84 

91 

39 

51 

Totals 

153 

150 

66 

93 

343 

Low  Champion  X  Blue  Pod  Butter, 

36 

26 

38 

48 

72 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    185. 


Extracted  self-colored  individuals  have  bred  true,  and  no  unpigmented 
beans  have  appeared.  We  may  note  at  this  point  that  Blue  Pod  Butter 
is  one  of  the  parents  of  all  these  crosses.  The  explanation  of  this  is 
that  Blue  Pod  Butter  is  the  only  self-colored  bean  bearing  the  factor  Y, 
all  other  self-colored  varieties  carrying  the  other  factor  for  mottling, 
designated  as  Z;  and  as,  according  to  Emerson's  theory,  mottling  can 
result  only  when  Y  and  Z  are  both  present,  the  variety  named  is 
the  only  self-colored  variety  that  can  produce  mottling  when  crossed 
with  the  other  self-colored  variety  used.  While  the  proportion  1:1  is 
held  quite  closely  when  the  total  numbers  of  reciprocal  crosses  are  con- 
sidered, it  may  be  noted  that  in  all  cases  except  the  crosses  involving  Blue 
Pod  Butter  with  Golden  Eyed  Wax  and  Challenge  Black  Wax  there  is  an 
alternate  preponderance  of  mottled  and  self-colored  beans  in  the  two 
members  of  the  reciprocal  crosses,  a  fact  that  may  have  a  significance, 
or  be  onlv  a  chance  occurrence. 


Table  V.  —  Crosses  of  Self-colored  with  White  Beans  yielding  Mottled 

Progeny. 


F3 

AND 

F4 

F2. 

(Mottled 

Par- 

Cross 
No. 

Parent  Varieties. 

ENTS  only). 

M. 

S. 

W. 

M. 

s. 

W. 

7 

Blue  Pod  Butter  (S)  X  Davis  Wax  (W),  . 

14 

3 

6 

36 
19 
18 

- 

21 

8 

Davis  Wax  (W)  X  Blue  Pod  Butter  (S),  . 

38 

13 

16 

9 

12 

40 

13 

8 

3 

33a 

Blue  Pod  Butter  (S)  X  White  Marrow  (W),     . 

-, 

41 

24 

- 

33 

Blue  Pod  Butter  (S)  X  White  Marrow  (W),     . 

74 

17 

22 

93 
82 
135 

12 

23 

60 

145 

34 

White  Marrow  (W)  X  Blue  Pod  Butter  (S).     . 

40 

17 

23 

21 
47 
31 

85 

9 

7 

8 
22 

67 

Burpee  Stringless  (S)  X  White  Marrow  (W),    . 

38 

16 

17 

124 
102 
11 
23 

48 
5 

38 
34 

68 

White  Marrow  (W)  X  Burpee  Stringless  (S),    . 

35 

11 

14 

100 
59 
11 

19 

23 

73 

Challenge  Black  Wax  (S)  X  Davis  Wax  (W),  . 

182 

68 

84 

72 

32 

40 

209 

29 

28 
6 

129 

Currie  (S)  X  White  Marrow  (W),      . 

63 

58 

49 

35 
9 
3 

31 
12 

30 

184 

White  Marrow  (W)  X  German  Black  Wax  (S), 

59 

19 

32 

17 

3 

49 

J 

4 

249 

Golden  Eyed  Wax  (S)  X  White  Marrow  (W),  . 

40 

22 

23 

14 

18 

52 

15 

28 

250 

White  Marrow  (W)  X  Golden  Eyed  Wax  (S),  . 

12 

6 

4 

21 
53 
14 

8 

9 
12 

298 

White  Marrow  (W)  X  Prolific  Black  Wax  (S),  . 

19 

14 

11 

10 

20 

4 

2 

6 
4 

SEED  COAT  COLOR  IN  GARDEN  BEANS. 


73 


At  least  two  of  the  white  varieties  used  in  this  work,  Davis  Wax  and 
White  Marrow,  seem  to  carry  the  factors  for  mottUng,  and  in  most  cases 
they  have  jielded  in  F2  mottled,  self-colored  and  white  beans  in  what  is 
probabI,y  a  9:3:4  ratio.  Crosses  with  these  varieties  are  shown  in  Table 
V.  All  extracted  whites  have  bred  true,  and  extracted  self-colored  beans 
have  either  bred  true  or  yielded  self-colored  and  mottled  beans  in  approxi- 
mately a  3:1  ratio.  In  several  cases  mottled  beans  have  been  extracted 
which  bred  true,  thus  indicating  that  in  some  cases  at  least  both  Davis 
and  Wliite  Marrow  carry  both  Y  and  Z ;  that  is,  they  are  really  mottled 
beans  lacking  pigment.  In  cross  33a  no  mottled  beans  appear,  probably 
because  Blue  Pod  Butter  and  the  particular  strain  of  Wliite  Marrow 
involved  carry  the  same  mottling  factor,  and  both  likewise  lack  the  other 
one.  It  is  certain  that  a  different  plant  of  Wliite  Marrow  was  used  and 
one  from  a  commercial  stock,  while  in  33  and  34,  individuals  of  a  selfed 
strain  were  used,  and  this  strain  was  not  derived  from  the  plant  used  in 
33a. 

In  the  cross  of  Golden  Eyed  Wax  X  Wliite  Marrow  (Table  V.)  the 
behavior  as  regards  mottling  is  as  expected  from  the  above  considera- 
tions. In  another  cross  of  what  were  supposed  to  be  the  same  varieties 
no  white  beans  appeared.  The  behavior  of  the  progeny  was  exactly 
what  would  be  expected  of  a  cross  of  Golden  Eyed  Wax  X  Warwick. 
Warwick  and  White  Marrow  were  grown  next  to  each  other  in  the  row, 
thus  making  it  easy  to  make  an  error  in  obtaining  blossoms.  We  are 
therefore  inclined  to  believe  that  the  irregularity  was  due  to  such  an 
error  in  pollination. 

According  to  Emerson's  theory  of  mottling  all  mottled  varieties  have 
the  constitution  PYZ  in  which  formula  P  indicates  the  factor  for  pig- 
mentation and  YZ  the  coupled  factors  for  mottling.  Non-mottled  pig- 
mented beans  can  have  only  one  of  these  factors  bearing  either  PYz  or 
PyZ.  White  beans  may  be  either  pYZ,  pYz  or  pyZ.  The  possible  re- 
sults of  intercrossing  these  types  of  beans  are  as  follows :  — 


Case  No 

Cross  Constitution. 

Color  of  Beans. 

Proportion  of 

Mottled,  Self  and 

White  in  F2. 

M. 

S. 

w. 

1, 

2. 
3, 
4, 
5, 
6, 
7, 
8. 

PYZ  X  PYz, 
PYZ  X  PyZ, 
PYZ  X  Pyz, 
PYZ  X  pYZ,       . 
PYZ  X  pYz, 
PYZ  X  pyZ, 
PYZ  X  pyz. 
PYz  X  PyZ, 

m  X  s,    . 
m  X  s,   . 
m  X  s,   . 
m  X  w, 
m  X  w, 
m  X  w, 
m  X  w, 
s  X  s, 

3 
3 
3 
3 
9 
9 
9 
2 

1 

1 
1 

3 
3 
3 
2 

1 
4 
4 
4 

74 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    185. 


Case  No 

Cross  Constitution. 

Color  of  Beans. 

Proportion  of 

Mottled,  Self,  and 

White  in  Fa. 

M. 

S. 

W. 

9,  . 

10,  . 

11,  . 

12,  . 

13,  . 

14,  . 

15,  . 

16,  . 

17,  . 

18,  . 

19,  . 

20,  . 

21,  . 

22,  . 

PYz  X  Pyz, 
PYz  X  pYZ, 
PYz  X  pYz, 
PYzJXtpyZ. 
PYz  Xfpyz, 
PyZ  X  Pyz, 
PyZ  X  pYZ, 
PyZ  X  pYz, 
PyZ  X  pyZ, 
PyZ  X  pyz, 
Pyz  X  pYZ, 
Pyz  X  pYz, 
Pyz  X  pyZ, 
Pyz  X  pyz, 

s  X  s,     . 
s  X  w,    . 
s  X  w,    . 
s  X  w,    . 
s  X  w,    . 
s  X  s,     . 
s  X  w,    . 

8  X  W,     . 

s  X  w,    . 
s  X  w,    . 
s  X  w,    . 
s  X  w,    . 
s  X  w,    . 
sXw.    . 

9 
6 

9 
6 

9 

4 
3 
3 
6 
3 
4 
3 
6 
3 
3 
3 
3 
3 
3 

The  results  secured  in  the  work  here  reported  can  be  quite  satisfactorily 
explained  on  the  above  theory.  All  crosses  of  mottled  beans  have  yielded 
only  mottled  beans,  as  shown  on  pages  67  and  68. 

Some  crosses  of  self-colored  beans  have  yielded  mottled  progeny. 
(See  Table  IV.)  In  most  such  crosses  Blue  Pod  Butter  is  one  of  the 
parents.  If  it  has  the  constitution  PYz  then  the  other  members  of  the 
crosses  must  be  PyZ.  Self-colored  beans  of  either  of  the  above  types, 
when  crossed  with  mottled  beans,  have  yielded  mottled  and  self-colored 
beans  in  the  proportion  of  approximately  3:1,  as  shown  in  Table  II. 

The  mottling  factors  of  white  beans  are  not  so  readily  determined, 
and  there  seems  to  have  been  more  than  one  strain  of  some  of  the  white 
varieties  used.  Davis  Wax  seems  always  to  carry  the  coupled  factors 
YZ.  (See  Tables  III.  and  V.)  It  is  probable  that  there  are  three  strains 
of  White  Marrow,  as  follows :  — 


Constitution. 

Found  in  Crosses  — 

pYZ 

pyZ 

pYz 

33,  34  (case  10),  67,  68,  129,  184,  249,  250,  298  (case  15), 
309a  (case  4). 
230,  309,  310,  366  (case  6). 

.33a  (case  11). 

Crosses  involving  Creasehack.  —  In  crosses  involving  Creaseback  the 
beans  in  F]  have  always  been  black  or  nearlj^  so.  In  the  cross  with  Chal- 
lenge Black  Wax  the  beans  were  nearly  black,  but  with  faint  signs  of 


SEED  COAT  COLOR  IN  GARDEN  BEANS. 


75 


mottling.  In  later  generations  black  beans  predominate,  with  some 
signs  of  indistinct  mottling  in  some  cases.  The  occasional  appearance  of 
mottling  suggests  that  one  or  both  raottUng  factors  are  carried  by  Crease- 
back.  The  fact  that  mottling  appears  with  Blue  Pod  Butter  which  in 
all  other  crosses  seems  to  carry  the  Y  only,  and  with  Challenge  Black 
Wax  which  carries  the  Z,  indicates  that  Creaseback  must  carry  both 
Y  and  Z,  or  that  more  than  one  strain  has  been  used.  If  coupled  factors 
are  present  there  should  appear  beans  breeding  true  to  the  mottled 
character.  No  such  cases  have  been  clearly  shown.  If  we  assume  that 
the  appearance  of  solid  or  nearly  solid  black  beans  is  due  to  the  presence 
of  an  additional  factor  X,  which  renders  the  black  color  epistatic  to 
mottling,  we  have  a  hypothesis  that  is  fairly  well  supported  by  the  limited 
data  available.    These  data  are  shown  in  Table  VI.    Crosses  31  and  32 


Table  VI.  —  Crosses  involving  Creaseback. 


Parent  Varieties. 

Fs   AND   F4. 

Cross 
No. 

F2. 

MOTTLED 
PARENTS. 

SELF 
PARENTS. 

M. 

S. 
101 

5 

42 

71 

150 
38 
52 

113 

10 
22 

W. 
53 

3 

12 

30 

42 

1 
36 

4 
15 

M. 

9 

S. 
7 

W. 
3 

M. 

4 

1 

12 
1 

4 
6 
9 
5 

54 
11 
10 

1 

5 
2 

S. 

59 

279 

217 

28 

11 

26 

134 

117 

8 

9 

160 

155 

14 

10 

2 

3 

44 

123 

3 
9 

14 
132 

43 

76 
4 

26 

W. 

31 

32 
31o 

32o 

97 

97a 

976 

•    97c 

247 
296 

Blue  Pod  Butter  X  Creaseback,      . 

Creaseback  X  Blue  Pod  Butter, 
Blue  Pod  Butter  X  Creaseback, 

Creaseback  X  Blue  Pod  Butter, 

Challenge  Black  Wax  X  Creaseback, 
Challenge  Black  Wax  X  Creaseback, 
Challenge  Black  Wax  X  Creaseback, 

Challenge  Black  Wax  X  Creaseback, 

Golden  Eyed  Wax  X  Creaseback,    . 
Creaseback  X  Prolific  Black  Wax,  . 

6 

8 

8 
8 

30 

22 

78 

1 

6 

18 

2 

3 

37 

1 
1 

33 
3 

3 
17 

1 

were  among  the  earlier  crosses  made,  and  while  no  individual  records  of 
mottled  beans  in  r2  were  kept,  it  is  evident  that  mottling  did  occur,  but 
it  was  very  faint  and  nearly  obscured  by  black  in  most  cases.  There 
were  a  few  dark  mottled  beans,  however,  and  one  of  these  being  selfed 
gave  the  proportions  of  mottled,  self-colored  and  white  beans  shown  in 
the  table.  In  crosses  31  and  32,  Table  VI.,  Creaseback  may  have  the 
formula  yZ,  for  in  this  case,  assuming  the  presence  of  X  in  Creaseback 


76 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    185. 


and  a  formula  of  Yz  for  Blue  Pod  Butter,  we  should  get  a  proportion  of 
6  mottled,  42  self-colored,  and  16  white,  which  proportion  is  rather  closely 
approximated  in  both  crosses  31  and  32.  The  crosses  with  Challenge 
Black  Wax  seem  to  present  different  combinations  of  characters.  Number 
97  was  one  of  the  early  crosses,  and  the  obscure  mottling  earlier  referred 
to  appeared,  but  no  record  was  preserved.  Cross  97c  was  made  later 
when  the  appearance  of  mottling  was  more  clearly  appreciated,  and  these 
two  may  be  of  the  same  nature.  Crosses  97o  and  976  are  probably  alike, 
and  the  failure  of  any  white  seeded  beans  to  appear  in  97a  due  to  chance. 
We  are  unable  to  explain  the  small  proportion  of  white  beans,  unless  it 
may  be  on  the  basis  of  difference  in  the  pigment  complex  earlier  referred 
to. 

In  cross  247,  Golden  Eyed  Wax  X  Creaseback,  no  mottled  beans  are 
recorded  in  F2,  but  in  later  generations  obscurely  mottled  beans  do  appear, 
and  it  is  not  impossible  that  a  closer  study  of  the  r2  generation  would  have 
revealed  their  presence.  Unfortunately  these  samples  are  among  those 
destroyed. 

This  variety  is  worth  further  study  and  a  full  comprehension  of  its 
behavior,  and  the  reasons  therefor  would  probably  throw  much  light  on 
the  inheritance  of  pigmentation,  not  only  in  beans  but  in  a  general  way. 

Another  variety  that  apparently  behaves  in  a  similar  way  is  Crystal 
Wax.  Owen^  reports  that  crossed  with  Round  Pod  Kidney  (Brittle  Wax) 
there  appeared  in  Fj  colored  and  dark  mottled,  nearly  black  beans,  and 
the  F2  plants  were  10  mottled,  24  self-colored  and  10  white,  nearly  all  of 
the  self-colored  seeds  being  black. 

Mottling  Patterns. 
Among  the  commercial  varieties  of  mottled  beans  two  prevailing  types 
of  mottling  are  evident.  Both  show  as  a  ground  color  a  sort  of  buff  or 
ecru.  In  the  darker  mottling,  represented  by  Red  Valentine  and  Refugee, 
this  color  prevails  over  only  a  small  part  of  the  seed,  while  in  the  lighter, 
represented  by  varieties  of  the  Horticultural  class,  it  covers  three-fourths 
or  more  of  the  surface.  Some  evidence  indicating  that  this  buff  color  is 
the  same  thing  in  both  light  and  dark  mottled  beans  will  be  presented 
later.  When  crossed,  the  darker  type  of  mottling  seems  to  behave  as  a 
simple  dominant  in  the  single  cross  that  has  been  made. 


Table  VII.  —  Light  and  Dark  Mottling. 


Parent  Varieties. 

F2. 

F3   AND   F4. 

Cross 
No. 

0  Parents. 

0  Parents. 

0. 

0. 

0. 

0. 

0. 

215 

Golden  Carmine  (0)  X  Mohawk  (0),  . 

1 

1 

33 
6 

10 

21 

'  Report  N.  J.  Experiment  Station,  1906,  p.  456. 


SEED  COAT  COLOR  IN  GARDEN  BEANS. 


77 


In  the  above  table  and  the  one  following,  0  represents  the  dark  or  Red 
Valentine  type  of  mottling,  and  o  the  Hght  or  Horticultural  type. 

The  behaiaor  of  "Wliite  Marrow  and  Davis  Wax  in  crosses  with  colored 
beans  indicates  that  both  these  varieties  possess  one  or  both  of  the  factors 
for  mottling,  as  has  already  been  shown  (page  73).  There  is  no  evidence 
that  the  factor,  O,  for  dark  mottling  is  present  in  either  variety.  Crosses 
of  these  two  varieties  with  Blue  Pod  Butter  (Table  V.)  yield  no  dark  mot- 
tled beans,  indicating  that  Blue  Pod  Butter  does  not  possess  the  0  factor. 
Therefore  Blue  Pod  Butter  may  be  described  as  PYzo,  and  the  two  white 
varieties  as  pyZo  or  pYZo.  All  dark  mottled  varieties  may  be  described 
as  PYZO.  All  other  pigmented  self-colored  sorts  used  in  these  experiments 
may  be  described  as  PyZO,  except  Warren,  which  is  probably  like  Blue 
Pod  Butter  so  far  as  mottling  factors  are  concerned. 

The  results  of  crossing  Wliite  Marrow  and  Davis  Wax  with  a  number 
of  pigmented  varieties  are  shown  in  Table  VIII.    A  study  of  the  results 

Table  VIII.  —  Mottling  Factors  in  White  Beans. 


Parent  Varieties. 

Fa  AND  Fi. 

Cross 
No. 

F2. 

0  Parents. 

o  Par- 
ents. 

S  Par- 
ents. 

O. 

0. 

S. 

W. 

0. 

22 

25 
4 

21 
3 
3 

30 

12 

5 
16 
51 
17 
18 
25 

1 

3 

5 

46 

27 

19 

4 

9 

7 

2 

6 

29 

17 
5 

0. 

4 
11 

7 
2 

3 

6 

1 

25 

5 

17 

0 
0 
2 
13 
18 

3 

4 
14 
4 

S. 

9 

23 
2 

30 
9 
6 

18 

4 
4 
5 

23 
9 

11 

3 

10 

2 
2 

W. 

16 

2 
2 
14 

2 

3 

29 

9 

6 
0 
0 

28 

6 

1 

3 

16 

7 
1 

o. 

7 
107 
19 
33 

9 

126 

94 

18 
11 
15 

21 
209 

61 
28 
38 
30 

W. 

22 
11 

2 

39 

30 

5 

3 

16 
11 

S. 

4 
3 

5 
21 

11 

52 

28 

78 

13 
5 

84 
55 

45 

38 
52 

W. 

230 

309 

368 

327 
327a 
141 
67 

68 

184 

73 

249 
250 

White  Marrow  (W)  X  Golden 

Carmine  (M). 
Red  Valentine    (M)   X  White 
Marrow  (W). 

White  Marrow  (W)  X  Burpee 
Kidney  (M). 

Ward  well  (M)  X  White  Mar- 
row (W). 

Ward  well  (M)  X  White  Mar- 
row (W). 

Davis  Wax  (W)  X  Keeney 
Rustless  (M). 

Burpee  Stringless  (S)  X  White. 
Marrow  (W). 

White  Marrow  (W)  X  Burpee 
Stringless  (S). 

White  Marrow  (W)  X  German 
Black  Wax  (S). 

Challenge  Black   Wax    (S)   X 
Davis  Wax  (W). 

Golden  Eyed  Wax  (S)  X  White 

Marrow  (W). 
White  Marrow  (W)  X  Golden 

Eyed  Wax  (S). 

33 

6 

10 
17 
14 
39 

23 

42 

141 

20 
8 

11 
9 

4 
4 
9 

12 

17 

51 

26 
5 

5 

2 

2 

16 
12 
19 
68 

22 
6 

7 
13 

3 

4 
2 
2 
17 

14 

32 
84 

33 
4 

1 

2 
4 

21 

27 

5 

34 

26 

7 

here  shown  indicates  that  the  factor  O  just  described  is  associated  with 
the  Z  mottling  factor.  If  this  be  the  case,  on  crossing  a  colored  bean 
PyZO  with  a  white  bean  pYZo  we  should  get  in  F2  a  proportion  of  six 


78         MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    185. 

dark  mottled,  three  light  mottled,  three  self-colored,  and  four  white,  which 
is  in  harmony  with  the  results  shown  in  the  table.  No  dark  mottled  beans 
could  breed  true,  and  no  extracted  light  mottled  beans  could  jdeld  self- 
colored  offspring. 

In  cross  230  Golden  Carmine,  which  must  be,  according  to  the  fore- 
going hypothesis,  of  the  constitution  PYZo,  when  crossed  with  White 
Marrow  yields  no  dark  mottled  beans,  but  does  yield  self-colored  beans. 
White  Marrow  must  therefore  be  pyZo,  and  the  proportion  in  F2  one  of 
9:3:4.  The  self-colored  beans  in  F3  and  F4  are  from  the  heterozygote 
parents,  and  are  not,  like  the  other  light  mottled  beans,  extracted  from  the 
heterozygote.  In  cross  309a  no  self-colored  beans  are  produced.  Red 
Valentine  must,  from  its  appearance,  be  PYZO,  and  Wliite  Marrow  must 
be  pYZo,  The  theoretical  F2  proportion  —  9  dark  mottled,  3  hght  mot- 
tled and  4  white  —  is  closely  approximated.  In  cross  366  Burpee  Kidney 
is  like  Red  Valentine  and  Wliite  Marrow  pyZo  as  in  cross  230,  the  non- 
appearance of  light  mottled  beans  in  F2  being  due  to  small  numbers.  In 
cross  327  Wardwell,  a  bean  with  a  dark  mottled  eye,  when  crossed  with 
White  Marrow  yields  no  light  mottled  beans,  while  in  327a  light  mottled 
beans  appear,  but  no  self-colored  ones.  This  can  be  explained  on  the 
assumption  that  in  cross  327  the  White  Marrow  plant  used  was  of  the  pyZo 
strain,  while  in  327a  a  plant  of  the  constitution  pYZo  was  used. 

In  cross  141,  Davis  Wax  X  Keeney  Rustless,  no  self-colored  beans  are 
produced,  and  as  in  all  other  crosses  of  Davis  Wax  it  has  the  formula 
pYZo,  while  Keeney  is  PYZO. 

In  crosses  67  and  68  Burpee  Stringless  must  be  PyZO  and  White  Mar- 
row pYZo.  On  the  assumption  that  the  O  and  Z  factors  are  associated  or 
coupled,  the  failure  of  light  mottled  progeny  to  appear  in  the  proportion 
18:0:6:9  must  be  due  to  the  small  numbers  involved,  and  this  lot  belong 
properly  on  the  second  hne  above,  it  being  of  the  same  constitution  as 
the  F2  heterozygote.  Similar  cases  are  found  in  crosses  181  and  73.  The 
appearance  of  a  single  self-colored  plant  from  a  light  mottled  parent  in 
cross  68  is  unexplained  unless  it  be  a  stray  plant.  Such  a  plant  undoubtedly 
did  appear  in  a  lot  all  of  which  were  supposed  to  be  from  a  light  mottled 
parent  plant.  It  is  not  thought  that  these  seeming  irregularities  are  suf- 
ficient to  throw  serious  doubt  upon  the  general  theory  of  the  inheritance 
of  types  of  mottling,  but  they  are  recorded  in  order  to  fully  present  the 
facts  as  they  have  appeared. 

Besides  the  tj-pes  of  motthng  here  discussed  a  wholly  different  type  has 
been  encountered  in  certain  crosses  involving  White  Marrow.  This  is  a 
fine  marbling  or  cloudy  mottling,  bluish,  brownish  or  bluish  black  in  color. 
It  is  similar  to  that  shown  by  the  variety  Cut  Short.  Data  bearing  on  this 
are  limited.  In  a  cross  of  Prolific  Black  Wax  X  White  Marrow  this  type 
of  mottling  appeared,  sometimes  covering  the  whole  bean  and  sometimes 
confined  to  a  limited  area,  giving  an  eyed  bean.  Three  plants  with  this 
type  of  mottling  yield  the  parent  type  and  white  in  the  numbers  of  6:9, 
20:4  and  5:1,  respectively.  They  have  been  extracted  from  both  self- 
colored  and  dark  mottled  parents. 


SEED  COAT  COLOR  IN  GARDEN  BEANS.      79 


The  Behavior  of  Eyedness. 

In  many  varieties  of  pigmented  beans  the  pigment  is  centered  around  the 
hilum,  producing  the  eyed  bean.  The  eye  may  be  restricted  to  a  very 
small  area  near  the  hilum,  or  it  may  extend  over  nearly  the  entire  bean,  and 
in  some  varieties  there  are  found  detached  circular  spots  on  the  dorsal 
or  lateral  portion  of  the  bean.  In  most  if  not  all  such  cases  the  pigmented 
area  around  the  hilum  is  large.  Leopard  Wax  is  a  variety  of  this  sort.  The 
pigments  and  different  types  of  mottling  found  in  totally  pigmented  beans 
may  occur  in  any  size  or  type  of  eye.  In  most  cases  the  edge  of  the  pig- 
mented area  is  not  sharply  defined,  but  in  others  it  is  clear-cut  and  definite. 
No  varieties  with  this  sharply  defined  edge  have  been  used  in  the  crosses 
here  reported,  but  they  have  been  extracted  from  certain  of  the  crosses. 

The  behavior  of  crosses  of  totally  pigmented  and  eyed  beans  made  in 
the  course  of  this  work  is  shown  in  Table  IX.  It  closely  resembles  that 
of  a  monohybrid,  but  the  proportions  in  the  r2  generation  are  somewhat 
at  variance  with  the  expectation.  The  total  number  of  plants  in  F2  is 
1705,  and  the  ratio  3.9:1.  Nearly  all  crosses  show  an  excess  of 
totally  pigmented  beans.  The  progeny  of  heterozygous  parent  plants  in 
F3  and  F4,  totaling  2,069,  show  a  ratio  of  3.02:1.  Why  this  difference  in 
the  behavior  in  heterozj^gous  plants  occurs,  it  is  impossible  to  explain  at 
present.  We  can  only  repeat  the  suggestion  made  with  reference  to  results 
shown  in  previous  tables  (page  65).  All  extracted  eyed  beans  have  bred 
true,  and  in  all  cases  the  beans  of  the  Fi  generation  have  been  totally 
pigmented. 

In  Table  X.  are  shown  the  results  of  crosses  of  eyed  and  white  beans. 
In  all  these  crosses  totally  pigmented  beans  are  produced  in  Fi.  In  the 
F2  generation  totally  pigmented,  eyed  and  white  beans  are  produced  in 
the  proportions  shown.  It  is  probable  that  these  plants  are  of  four  classes 
and  may  yield  all  three  tj^es,  totally  pigmented  and  eyed,  totally  pig- 
mented and  white,  or  they  may  be  homozygous  for  total  pigmentation. 
Eyed  beans  may  be  pure  or  may  yield  eyed  and  white. 

These  results  are  in  harmony  with  the  conclusions  of  Emerson  (5)  and 
Tschermak  (22),  and  indicate  that  total  pigmentation  is  dependent  upon 
two  characters,  —  P  for  pigmentation  and  T,  which  spreads  the  pigment 
over  the  entire  bean,  and  the  absence  of  which,  Pt,  causes  an  eyed  bean. 

As  has  been  the  experience  of  previous  experimenters  we  have  found 
no  beans  with  the  formula  pt.  However,  we  have  used  only  five  white 
seeded  sorts,  and  only  three  pi  these  at  all  extensively.  The  white  beans 
extracted  from  an  eyed  parent  in  crosses  249,  268  and  327  should  be  of 
this  constitution,  and  should  yield  no  totally  pigmented  beans  on  crossing 
with  an  eyed  form.  Unfortunately,  none  of  these  few  white  seeded  plants 
were  self-fertiUzed  or  retained  for  seed,  making  it  impossible  to  test  this 
theory.  » 

The  fact  that  eye  sizes  differ  has  been  mentioned.  While  too  few 
accurate  data  have  been  collected  in  the  course  of  these  experiments  to 
make  any  definite  report,  it  is  evident  that  these  eye  sizes  are  inherited 


80  MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    185. 


Table  IX.  —  Crosses  of  Eyed  with  Self-colored  Beans. 


Cross 
No. 


Parent  Varieties. 


Fa. 


Fs  and  F4 

(Totally  Pigmented 

Parents). 


16 


50 


190 


237 


112 


240 


191 


258 


27 


28 


201 


Blue  Pod  Butter  X  Golden  Eyed  Wax,  . 

Ratios 

Golden  Eyed  Wax  X  Blue  Pod  Butter,  . 

Ratios 

Golden  Eyed  Wax  X  Burpee  Stringless, 

Ratios,        ...... 

Giant  Stringless  X  Golden  Eyed  Wax,   . 

Ratios,        ...... 

Golden  Eyed  Wax  X  Giant  Stringless,  . 

Ratios 

Golden  Eyed  Wax  X  Prolific  Black  Wax, 

Ratios, 

Challenge  Black  Wax  X  Golden  Eyed  Wi 

Ratios,         ...... 

Currie  X  Golden  Eyed  Wax, 

Ratios 

Red  Valentine  X  Golden  Eyed  Wax,      . 

Ratios, 

Golden  Eyed  Wax  X  Red  Valentine,      . 

Ratios 

Keeney  Rustless  X  Burpee  Stringless,    . 

Ratios,        ...... 

Giant  Stringless  X  Keeney  Rustless, 

Ratios,         ...... 

Red  Valentine  X  Keeney  Rustless, 

Ratios, 

Bl^e  Pod  Butter  X  Wardwell, 

Ratios 

Wardwell  X  Blue  Pod  Butter, 

Ratios, 

Burpee  Stringless  X  Wardwell, 

Ratios, 

Giant  Stringless  X  Wardwell, 

Ratios, 


Totally 
Pigmented.  Eyed 
41 


6.9 
117 


31 

7.7 
110 

3.9 
42 


87 

3.3 
157 

3.7 
186 

3.5 
191 

4.8 
256 

6.3 
14 

4-7 

5 

15 
7.5 

4 

4-0 

39 
3.3 
25 


35 


28 


26 


40 


48 


43 


Totally 
Pigmented.  Eyed 
79  3" 

65 

S.l  : 

200 


125 
154 


103 
93 

3. 

79 
80 
3. 

225 

130 

3. 

70 
192 

2. 

114 
36 

3. 

60 

4. 

59 

55 

6. 

54 
26 


13 
131 


123 
104 


S.7 


53 

8 
6. 

120 

42 

3. 


38 


34 


26 


74 


38 


25 


46 


35 


SEED  COAT  COLOR  IN  GARDEN  BEANS. 


81 


in  definite  proportions.  Larger  eye  sizes  show  more  tendency  to  break 
up  than  smaller  ones.  It  is  probable  that  the  formula  Pt  above  referred 
to  should  be  taken  to  indicate  the  smallest  eye  size  observed,  and  that 

Table  X.  —  Crosses  of  Eyed  with  White  Beans. 


F2. 

Fs   AND   F4. 

TOTALLY          1 

PIGMENTED       1 

PARENTS.         1 

Parent  Varieties. 

No. 

M 

M 

Ph-O 

S-a 

>,^ 

>,^ 

t3 

<u 

•B 

a> 

■0 

» 

\ 

^B 

>. 

IS 

^6 

>. 

J3 

>> 

la 

S3 

H 

w 

e= 

H 

w 

es 

W 

ts 

W 

141 

Davis  Wax  X  Keeney  Rustless, 

17 

1 

2 

45 
14 

4 
5 

18 

- 

- 

- 

247 

Golden  Eyed  Wax  X  Creaseback,   . 

9 

1 

4 

45 
68 
3 
4 

4 
20 

18 

1 

12 

249 

Golden  Eyed  Wax  X  White  Marrow, 

51 

17 

23 

19 

9 

133 

11 

5 
4 

12 

44 

12 
10 

3 

250 

White  Marrow  X  Golden  Eyed  Wax, 

15 

3 

4 

62 

4 

25 

31 
6 

21 

8 

56 

268 

White  Marrow  X  Keeney  Rustless,  . 

4 

8 

7 

26 

7 
18 

6 

9 
2 

39 

9 

327 

Wardwell  X  White  Marrow,     . 

25 

9 

5 

22 
23 

4 

5 

7 
7 

20 
21 

9 

6 

the  larger  eye  sizes  are  due  to  the  presence  of  other  factors.  If  there  are 
two  additional  factors  for  eye  size  they  could  yield  four  homozygous 
eye  sizes,  and  there  are  without  doubt  at  least  that  number  known. 
There  could  be  also  four  heterozygous  forms  which  might  exhibit  other 
sizes.    Thus  the  following  formulae  may  express  various  eye  sizes:  — ■ 


Formula. 

Eye  Size. 

Found  in  — 

Ptrs, 

PtRs 

PtrS. 

PtRS 

Very  small  eye,         .... 

Small  eye 

Medium  eye, 

Large  eye 

Maule  Butter. 
Golden  Eyed  Wax. 
Keeney  Rustless. 
Leopard. 

Of  course  the  characters  R  and  S  could  be  carried  by  any  totally  pig- 
mented bean,  but  could  not  appear  until  a  cross  with  some  eyed  form  was 
made. 


82 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    185. 


The  Inheritance  of  Pigments. 

Thus  far  we  have  dealt  with  the  inheritance  of  pigment  patterns  without 
reference  to  the  particular  colors  involved.  All  the  pigment  patterns 
studied  carry  many  different  colors.  So  far  as  we  have  been  able  to  see, 
there  is  no  relation  between  the  behavior  of  pigment  patterns  and  the 
pigments  themselves.  We  will  now  consider  the  manner  in  which  the 
several  pigments  behave  in  inheritance. 

It  is  evident  that  there  are  two  classes  of  pigments  found  in  the  varieties 
of  colored  beans  used  in  these  experiments.  One  class  appears  as  some 
shade  of  red  or  purplish  red,  and  is  found  in  Red  Valentine,  Golden 
Carmine,  Mohawk  and  similar  colored  varieties.  This  pigment  is  readily 
soluble  in  water,  as  shown  by  laboratory  tests  and  indicated  by  the  readi- 
ness with  which  such  seeds  fade  when  exposed  to  the  action  of  dew  and 
rain  in  the  field.  The  light  reds,  such  as  Red  Valentine,  take  on  the 
purplish  color  when  treated  with  alkali,  and  the  purplish  reds  of  Mohawk 
change  to  a  bright  red  in  acid  solutions.  The  former  are  unchanged  in 
acid  solutions  and  the  latter  in  alkaline  solutions.    These  reactions  indi- 


Table  XI.  —  Crosses  of  Blue  Pod  Butter  ivith  other  Self-colored  Varieties. 


Cross 

Parent  Vabieties. 

Fi. 

F3   AND   F4  (Va- 
rious Colored 
Parents  only). 

No. 

Various 
Other 
Colors. 

B. 

Various 
Other 
Colors. 

B. 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

9 

10 

11 

12 

21 

22 

15 

16 

352 

3431 
347/ 

349 

Blue  Pod  Butter  X  Burpee  Stringless, 
Burpee  Stringless  X  Blue  Pod  Butter, 
Blue  Pod  Butter  X  Challenge  Black  Wax,  . 
Challenge  Black  Wax  X  Blue  Pod  Butter,  . 
Blue  Pod  Butter  X  Currie,  .... 

Currie  X  Blue  Pod  Butter 

Blue  Pod  Butter  X  German  Black  Wax,     . 
German  Black  Wax  X  Blue  Pod  Butter,     . 
Blue  Pod  Butter  X  Giant  Stringless,  . 
Giant  Stringless  X  Blue  Pod  Butter,  . 
Blue  Pod  Butter  X  Prolific  Black  Wax, 
Prolific  Black  Wax  X  Blue  Pod  Butter, 
Blue  Pod  Butter  X  Golden  Eyed  Wax, 
Golden  Eyed  Wax  X  Blue  Pod  Butter, 
Brittle  Wax  X  Blue  Pod  Butter, 

Blue  Pod  Butter  X  Low  Champion,    . 

Blue  Pod  Butter  X  Warren, 

176 

116 

57 

174 

25 

71 

10 

63 

8 

45 

123 

101 

35 

37 

5 

44 

1 

56 
40 
18 
53 

7 
11 

6 
12 

1 
30 
48 
34 
14 
20 

1 
12 

2 

231 
156 
37 
95' 
33 
43 
51 
98 
3 
38 
87 
134 
31 

45 
23 
30 
38 

82 
236 
26 
51 
18 
23 
66 
90 
5 

50 
106 

68 
22 
22 
20 
2 
26 

15 
15 

26 
10 

7 
22 
3 

26 

SEED  COAT  COLOR  IN  GARDEN  BEANS. 


83 


cate  that  this  pigment  is  anthocyan.  In  order  to  distinguish  this  from 
the  other  series  it  is  called  the  red  series. 

The  other  class  of  pigments  encountered  in  this  work  shows  itself  in 
the  various  shades  of  j'ellow,  coffee  brown  and  black  seen  in  Giant  String- 
less,  Burpee  Stringless  and  all  the  Black  Wax  varieties.  This  pigment 
does  not  fade  in  the  field,  and  seems  only  slightly  soluble,  or  possibly  in- 
soluble, in  water,  but  dissolves  in  alcohol  and  alkalies.  Not  enough  work 
has  been  done  with  it  to  determine  its  identity,  and  this  series  of  colors  is 
referred  to  in  this  paper  as  the  yellow-black  series. 

The  variety  Blue  Pod  Butter  is,  as  previously  explained,  different  from 
most  other  varieties  in  seed  coat  color  and  in  other  characters  as  well. 
The  flower  is  deeper  colored  than  any  other  variety  and  the  whole  plant 
deeply  tinged  with  purple.  The  seed  is  of  ecru  or  buff  color,  not  seen  in 
other  self-colored  varieties  except  Bountiful,  which  is  similar.  This  buff 
color  is  of  the  same  appearance  as  the  ground  color  in  all  mottled  beans. 

In  Table  XI.  are  shown  the  results  of  crosses  of  Blue  Pod  Butter  with 
other  varieties  of  various  solid  colors.  In  all  these  crosses  the  Fi  genera- 
tion shows  no  self-colored  buff  beans,  but  all  are  mottled.  In  F2  we  get 
a  proportion  of  1  buff  or  B  bean  to  3  of  various  other  colors.  In  all  cases 
the  extracted  buff  beans  have  bred  true  to  seed  color,  and  also  they  carry 
the  deeply  colored  flowers  and  purplish  foliage  of  Blue  Pod  Butter.  Of 
the  beans  shown  in  the  colunm  headed  "various  other  colors"  in  F2, 
one-fourth  are  of  solid  color  and  yield  only  solid  colored  beans  in  F3  and 
F4,  while  three-fourths  are  mottled  and  break  up  in  F3  in  the  same  manner 
as  do  the  Fi  plants.  In  no  case  has  a  soUd  colored  bean  jaelded  a  buff  bean 
like  those  borne  by  Blue  Pod  Butter.    In  Table  XII.  are  shown  crosses 


Table  XII.  —  Crosses  of  Blue  Pod  Butter  with  Mottled  Varieties. 


Cross 

F2. 

Fa    AND    F4    (Va- 
rious Colored 
Parents  only). 

No. 

Various 
Other 
Colors. 

B. 

Various 
Other 
Colors. 

B. 

23 
29 
30 
19 
20 
27 
28 

Blue  Pod  Butter  X  Red  Valentine, 
Blue  Pod  Butter  X  Warwick,       . 
Warwick  X  Blue  Pod  Butter, 
Blue  Pod  Butter  X  Mohawk, 
Mohawk  X  Blue  Pod  Butter, 
Blue  Pod  Butter  X  Wardwell,      . 
Wardwell  X  Blue  Pod  Butter,      . 

23 
39 
105 
9 
7 
5 
33 

7 

10 
51 
1 
4 
4 
10 

26 
15 
106 
230 
16 
92 
14 
52 

16 

130 

7 

87 
103 

17 

45 

3 

6 

27 
32 

of  Blue  Pod  Butter  with  mottled  beans.    Their  behavior  is  similar  to  the 
crosses  shown  in  Table  XI.,  except  that  homozygous  mottled  beans 


84         MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    185. 

appear.  These  facts  suggest  that  Blue  Pod  Butter  lacks  some  factor 
possessed  by  the  other  varieties,  and,  furthermore,  that  it  is  associated 
•with  a  mottling  factor.  We  have  called  this  factor  M.  We  have  already 
adopted  the  explanation  of  the  phenomenon  of  mottling  by  assuming  a 
formula  for  Blue  Pod  Butter  of  PTYz,  —  that  is,  Blue  Pod  Butter  lacks 
one  of  the  mottling  factors,  Z,  while  the  other  varieties  shown  in  Table 
XI.  have  this  factor  Z.  Blue  Pod  Butter,  then,  lacks  both  Z  and  M, 
while  all  the  other  varieties  carry  these  factors.  We  can  then  express 
the  constitution  of  Blue  Pod  Butter  by  the  formula  PTYzmo,  and  Burpee 
Stringless,  for  example,  by  PTyZMO,  and  the  evidence  is  that  Z  and  M 
are  always  associated,  or  that  we  have  another  case  of  apparently  perfect 
gametic  coupling.  The  varieties  other  than  Blue  Pod  Butter  must  possess 
additional  determining  factors  for  the  various  colors  exhibited.  These 
will  be  dealt  with  later. 

It  has  been  said  that  we  have  two  series  of  pigments  in  beans,  —  one 
bearing  the  red  series,  eAddently  anthocyan,  and  the  other  what  we  have 
called  the  yellow-black  series.  The  crosses  given  in  Table  XL,  excepting 
343,  347  and  349,  are  of  the  latter  nature,  while  these  two  crosses  and 
three  in  Table  XII.  are  crosses  with  varieties  exhibiting  colors  of  the  red 
series.  These  behave  like  those  given  in  the  previous  table  so  far  as  the 
relation  of  their  colors  to  the  B  of  Blue  Pod  Butter  is  concerned. 

If  we  assume  that  it  is  the  factor  just  discussed  that  is  the  determining 
element  for  the  class  of  pigment  borne,  and  assume,  further,  that  there 
are  two  of  these  pigment  modifiers,  one  of  which,  M,  brings  about  the 
formation  of  the  yellow-black  pigments,  and  the  other,  which  we  may  call 
M',  the  formation  of  those  of  the  red  or  anthocyan  series,  we  have  a  theory 
that  seems  to  explain  the  facts  alreadj^  presented  and  others  shown  later 
as  well. 

The  production  of  a  totally  pigmented  bean,  then,  rests  on  the  presence 
of  several  factors.  First,  we  must  have  P,  in  the  absence  of  which  we  have 
a  white  bean;  second,  T,  in  the  absence  of  which  the  bean  has  an  eye; 
third,  the  presence  of  M  or  M',  the  former  causing  beans  of  the  j'^ellow- 
black  series,  and  the  latter,  pigment  of  the  red  series.  If  neither  or  only 
one  of  the  mottling  factors  Y  and  Z  are  present  the  bean  is  self-colored, 
while  if  both  are  present  a  mottled  bean  results.  If  P  and  T  are  present 
and  M  and  M'  absent,  the  bean  is  buff-colored,  shown  in  Blue  Pod  Butter 
and  the  lighter  shades  in  mottled  beans.  All  colored  varieties  used  in  these 
experiments  carry  Y  or  Z  or  both;  and  the  factor  M  or  M'  or  both  are, 
when  present,  always  associated  Tvith  the  factor  Z. 

The  Behavior  of  the  Yellow-Black  Determiners. 
When  the  factors  P,  T  and  M  are  present,  a  buff  or  ecru  colored  bean 
is  produced.  The  presence  of  certain  additional  factors  modifies  this  to 
the  various  colors  of  the  yellow-black  series.  These  colors  are  black, 
designated  by  G;  coffee  brown,  designated  by  F;  yellow,  designated  by 
C;  and  a  possible  light  brown  or  olive  brown,  designated  by  H.    The  first- 


I 


SEED  COAT  COLOR  IN  GARDEN  BEANS. 


85 


named  color,  G,  is  found  in  all  black  wax  beans;  the  second,  F,  in  Burpee 
Stringless;  and  the  third,  C,  in  Giant  Stringless  and  Golden  Eyed  Wax. 
The  color  H  is  of  a  somewhat  uncertain  nature  and  our  records  are  doubt- 
less somewhat  confused.  It  is  probable  that  more  than  one  character  has 
been  recorded  as  H.  There  is  reason  to  believe  that  additional  determiners 
of  this  series  may  exist,  but  our  data  are  too  fragmentary  to  afford  a  basis 
for  any  positive  assertions.    In  Table  XIII.  are  shown  the  results  of  cross- 

Table  XIII.  —  Crosses  of  Varieties  carrying  Yellow-hrown  Determiners. 


Pabent  Varieties. 

Fi. 

Fs   AND    F4. 

Cross 
No. 

F2. 

G 

Parents. 

F  Par- 
ents. 

C  Par- 
ents. 

G. 

F. 

C. 

G. 

F. 

C. 

F. 

C. 

C. 

190 
50 
81 

43 
44 

Golden  Eyed   Wax    (C)    X   Giant 

Stringless  (C). 
Golden  Eyed  Wax   (C)   X  Burpee 

Stringless  (F). 
Challenge  Black  Wax  (G)  X  Golden 

Eyed  Wax  (C). 

Burpee  Stringless  (F)  X  Challenge 

Black  Wax  (G). 
Challenge  Black  Wax  (G)  X  Burpee 

Stringless  (F). 

C 

F 
G 

G 
G 

34 

84 

55 

24 
2 

14 
17 

all 
9 
16 

5 

22 
14 
51 

124 
180 
101 

3 

6 

17 

63 

3 
8 

44 
156 
21 

86 

57 

23 

7 

71 

ing  several  varieties  carrying  yellow-brown  determiners.  Golden  Eyed 
Wax  X  Giant  Stringless  yields  only  yellow  beans  like  the  parental  vari- 
eties. In  cross  50,  a  yellow  (C)  by  coffee  brown  (F),  we  get  apparently  a 
simple  monohybrid,  the  two  varieties  differing  in  that  only  Burpee  String- 
less possesses  the  determiner  F.  In  all  crosses  involving  Challenge  Black 
Wax  the  Fi  seeds  were  black.  In  cross  81  Challenge  Black  Wax  must 
carry  G  and  F,  for  coffee  brown  beans  like  those  of  Burpee  Stringless  were 
extracted  in  F2  and  later  generations.  It  probably  carries  also  the  j^ellow 
determiner  C,  for  no  beans  lacking  all  three  determiners  appeared.  In 
the  F2  generation  the  proportions  should  be  12:3:1,  assuming  that  F  is 
epistatic  to  C  and  G  epistatic  to  F.  The  proportions  on  record  are  34:2:16. 
There  is  reason  to  believe  that  some  of  the  plants  recorded  as  C  were  really 
F.  The  progeny  of  one  C  plant  were  mostly  F.  Usually  it  is  not  difficult 
to  distinguish  the  two  colors,  but  in  this  case  it  is  probable  that  some  errors 
were  made.  In  crosses  43  and  44  we  probably  have  a  monohybrid,  the 
Challenge  Black  Wax  carrying  the  determiner  G  which  is  lacking  in 
Burpee  Stringless.    Both  carry  the  F  and  C  determiners. 

Following  the  notation  used,  the  formulae  for  these  varieties  seem  to 
be  as  follows :  — 

Golden  Eyed  Wax PtyZMm'OgfC 

Giant  Stringless PTyZMm'OgfC 

Burpee  Stringless, PTyZMm'OgFC 

Challenge  Black  Wax, PTyZMm'OGFC 


86  MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    185. 

In  Table  XIV.  are  shown  the  results  of  crossing  Burpee  Stringless  and 
Golden  Eyed  Wax  with  two  other  black  wax  varieties,  —  ProUfic  Black 
Wax  and  Currie.  These  crosses  differ  from  those  shown  in  the  preceding 
table  in  that  two  new  colors  designated  as  H  and  B  make  their  appearance 
in  relatively  small  numbers. 

Burpee  Stringless  carries  the  yellow-black  modifier  M  and  the  deter- 
miners F  for  coffee  brown,  and  C  for  yellow.  Prolific  Black  Wax  probably 
carries  the  F  and  possibly  C,  though  other  crosses  of  this  variety  seem 
to  show  that  it  lacks  C,  in  which  case  its  non-appearance  here  may  be 
explained  by  the  small  numbers  involved.  It  also  carries  the  black  de- 
terminer G  and  possibly  another  one,  H,  for  olive  brown,  though  the  be- 
ha\aor  of  this  color  is  not  at  all  well  understood. 

In  other  crosses  of  this  table  buff-colored  beans  (B)  appear.  According 
to  our  hypothesis  this  can  occur  only  when  the  modifier  M  is  absent,  or, 
if  present,  only  when  all  determiners  are  absent.  In  these  varieties  M  is 
present,  therefore  they  must  carry  no  determiner  in  common.  Golden 
Eyed  Wax  carries  the  determiner  C,  and  this  must  be  absent  in  the  vari- 
eties Currie  and  Prolific  Black  Wax.  The  absence  of  B  beans  from  the 
Fj  generation  may  easily  be  due  to  the  small  number  involved. 

In  one  cross  of  Golden  Eyed  Wax  with  Currie,  H  beans  appear,  while 
in  the  other  none  are  recorded.  This  may  be  due  to  the  absence  of  a  de- 
terminer for  H  in  the  strain  of  Currie  involved.  As  elsewhere  stated  the 
behavior  of  the  type  recorded  as  H  is  uncertain  and  not  well  understood. 
The  data  presented  in  Table  XIV.  indicate  the  formulae  for  Currie  of 
PTyZMm'OGFc,  with  the  possible  additional  determiner  H,  and  for 
Prolific  Black  Wax,  of  PTyZMm'GFc  and  possibly  the  H  in  addition. 
The  latter  may  carry  also  the  determiner  C,  preventing  the  appearance  of 
buff  beans,  but  as  other  crosses  indicate  that  it  does  not  carry  C,  it  is 
regarded  as  more  probable  that  the  absence  of  B  beans  is  due  to  the  small 
numbers  involved. 

In  Table  XV.  are  shown  the  results  of  the  crosses  of  Blue  Pod  Butter 
with  Burpee  Stringless  (coffee  brown),  and  with  two  yellow  seeded  sorts. 
All  these  crosses  but  one  give  black  mottled  beans  in  Fi.  While  none  of 
the  mottled  beans  breed  true  in  later  generations,  as  has  been  already 
explained,  there  have  been  many  cases  where  solid  black  beans  have  bred 
true.  The  appearance  of  these  black  beans  is  explained  on  the  hypothesis 
that  Blue  Pod  Butter  carries  the  black  determiner  G,  but  does  not  have 
the  yellow-black  modifier  M,  and  the  lack  of  this  prevents  the  G  determiner 
from  acting.  On  crossing  with  a  variety  carrying  M,  the  G  takes  effect, 
producing  a  black  or  black  mottled  bean.  In  cross  16a  no  black  beans 
appear.  It  is  probable  that  another  strain  of  Blue  Pod  Butter  which 
lacked  the  G  determiner  was  used  in  this  cross.  It  must  have  carried  the 
determiner  F,  for  F  is  always  epistatic  to  C,  and  could  not  be  carried  by 
Golden  Eyed  Wax.  No  B  beans  appear  in  Fo,  owing,  doubtless,  to  the 
small  numbers,  for  they  do  come  out  in  later  generations  as  extractives 
from  F  parents,  and  some  of  them  breed  true. 


SEED    COAT   COLOR   IN    GARDEN   BEANS. 


87 


I 

> 

I— I 

X 

< 


«■ 

1         <N 

COM 

1 

2; 

O  w 

P5 

d 

1          CDOO 

>o 

1 

to 

«■ 

If                                     1                                     1 

w 

1    -H      1 

1 

1 

W 

K 

<: 

P-( 

d 

1               1 

00 

1 

Q 

&H 

P^ 

o>       -^t 

t~ 

1 

[i? 

fq 

I          (M        00 

1    IM 

■ 

W 

1            1 

M-H 

rt             (NO 

CO 

PS 

«1 

d 

1         OiO 

■W«|--rt 

1   «       t^ 

(ll 

O 

t^" 

y-<          1   e-J        CO 

N 

O        COrt               00 

M                                          -H 

d 

Tj*  ■«*  CO  oa  cc  CO  CO 

ro>o  —< 

•OOCO^-^CO-^COC^-^J* 

r-irt      <>)  ec-* 

COOO.-(          >0— ITjlTjl 

t5 

«■ 

>«        1 

CO 

- 

d 

1          CO 

CO 

CO 

p^' 

(N         O 

CO 

o 

es 

c^ 

d 

t~       tN. 

o 

o 

« 

■* 

(S 

o   o 

o 

o 

o      • 

o 

X 

s 

1       • 

&: 

^ 

to 

'o 

cd 

w 

rf       'T' 

s  s 

a 

3 

o        0> 

.2 

< 
> 

o      :3 

S 

t4 

£   u 

O 

t^ 

H 

X5     *^ 

>1 

><i 

fa     S 

o 

O 

Pi 

i  s 

^ 

g 

"Si    — 

c     ^ 

^ 

^ 

13 

Ti 

.S       o 

o 

0) 

-S      >> 

>. 

>) 

OQ      W 

w 

W 

o      a 

c 

a 

Q>          o 

a    T3 

2 

2 

fcH     »— t 

3        O 

"o 

"3 

«     O 

o 

O 

¥ 

C3 

lO         — c 

- 

CO 

88         MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    185. 


ft; 


o; 

o 


O 


> 

w 
hi 

B 
<! 
H 


fog 

m 

O                                 <M 

1       1       1 

O 

■ 

n 

c3                 ' 

O          1         lO 

CO 

1 

1 

6 

5:S 

S52  '     S 

—  m 

«, 

1 

m 

.100        (MIO        — <t^ 

1       n        1 

1 

1 

1 

a 

< 

K 

W 

OOr).(N               ^                 1            1             1             1                         1                               1 

d 

"5                                    1                   1             1            1            1                         1                               1 

fa 

1                .-HOOC^IMHIMI            1            1            {                         1                                1 

00 
H 

< 

P5 

t~        ■*                        1 

1         1         1 

1 

CO 

K 

00—        C^                1 

1         1         1 

tS* 

1 

u 

1    CMO        00           1 

1        r        1 

i 

1 

fa 

fa' 

cq-*-*totoo    1 

1        1        1 

« 

10  05 

K 

•< 

Ph 

O 

pq 

CO                                  (N 

>0         M         ■* 

1    (MCO-* 

] 

W 

1                     1 

1             1          rtCJ     1 

■* 

1 

u 

1      — ■*          1 

«•*  1        1 

- 

CJ     1    lO 

1 

fa' 

O          -*                          -H 

f       1       i 

.ICO 

■*  1       n 

1 

d 

-H      ooi«co      ma 

CO                   »o             00 

tooooor^cooocotOrt 

CO(M  ^^Oi  W5    1 

fS 

pa 

<o                        o 

>0                                  -"Jl 

r-l         ■*         O 

- 

00 

1 

W 

•o                            •*              1          1          1          i                     1                          1 

d 

M<                       a> 

C^        C^        CO 

lO 

t>. 

-' 

fa' 

m                       o 

1          1        o 

- 

co 

Ira 

d 

(N                                  S 

CO        ■<»<        t^ 

■* 

OS 

1 

fe 

o             o 

o  o   o 

o 

c 

fa 

■a 

Burpee  String- 
Blue  Pod  But- 

iant  Stringless, 
Blue  Pod  But- 
ue  Pod  Butter, 

T3 

fa 

a 
O 

3 

pa 

•a 

3 

s 

"3 

pa 

(2 

3 

5 

Blue  Pod  Butter  X 
less. 

Burpee  Stringless  X 
ter. 

Blue  Pod  Butter  X  G 

Giant  Stringless  X 

ter. 
Giant  Stringless  X  B 

"3 

P3 

T3 

5 

>1 

1 

Si 

fa 
fl 

o    . 

"W  is 

o 

><5 

X 
C3 

» 

fa 

a 

<s     . 

o 

8  o 

6^ 

ri                   N 

;-        C.        ^ 

S 

CO 

a 

CO 

I 


SEED  COAT  COLOR  IN  GARDEN  BEANS.      89 

Beans  classified  as  H  appear  in  Fg  in  the  crosses  with  Burpee  Stringless 
only,  but  they  do  appear  scatteringly  in  later  generations  of  most  of  the 
other  crosses.  Too  small  numbers  are  involved  to  determine  its  nature 
and  relations.  It  is  not  always  easy  to  separate  the  several  colors  F,  C  and 
H  in  making  field  observations.  These  colors  seem  to  develop  in  the  ripen- 
ing beans  somewhat  in  order  of  their  epistasis,  the  olive  H  first,  and  so  on 
up  to  the  coffee  brown,  and  even  black,  provided  determiners  for  these 
higher  colors  are  present.  The  fact  that  several  selfed  plants  recorded  as 
H  gave  rise  to  offspring  made  up  partially  or  wholly  of  F  beans  in  crosses 
1  and  2  raises  the  suspicion  that  these  parent  plants  really  carried  the 
determiner  F,  but  for  some  reason  failed  to  develop  their  true  color.  Pos- 
sibly the  weakening  effect  of  covering  the  plant,  which  has  been  already 
discussed,  may  have  had  this  effect. 

The  yellow  color  C  is  more  positively  determined  in  the  field,  and  the 
records  seem  clear.  Extracted  C  beans  either  breed  true  or  yield  B  beans 
in  the  proportions  3C:1B.  According  to  our  hypothesis  there  might  be  a 
9:7  proportion  in  cases  like  this  when  the  heterozygote  is  a  hybrid,  as 
Mc  mC.  Such  a  heterozygote  would  be  yellow,  and  would  yield  9  yellow 
to  7  buff.  No  such  proportion  is  approached  among  the  offspring  of 
G  parents,  but  in  the  other  columns  are  shown  a  few  cases  that  approach 
such  a  proportion.  Their  number  is  too  few  to  be  sure  whether  they  are 
9:7  or  3:1  proportions.  The  total  numbers  of  such  offspring  in  the  table 
are  172  G,  F,  H  and  C  beans  to  73  buff.  This  is  a  considerable  excess  of 
buff  beans,  and  supports  the  idea  that  some  of  these  proportions  are 
really  9 :7.  If  such  cases  do  occur  the  buff  beans  would  be  of  three  kinds, 
some  lacking  the  modifier  M,  some  the  determiner  and  some  lacking 
both.  This  raises  the  question  whether  these  can  be  distinguished  from 
each  other.  While  this  cannot  be  answered  positively,  we  are  quite  sure 
that  more  than  one  kind  of  buff  beans  does  appear.  Some  further  evidence 
will  be  presented  on  this  point  in  connection  with  a  discussion  of  the 
relations  between  seed  coat  and  flower  colors. 

In  Table  IV.  are  shown  the  results  of  crossing  self-colored  varieties 
where  mottled  progeny  resulted.  This  showed  equal  numbers  of  self- 
colored  and  mottled  beans,  in  harmony  with  the  hypothesis  of  Emerson. 
In  Table  XVI,  are  shown  those  crosses  which  involve  Blue  Pod  Butter 
and  black  wax  varieties,  separating  the  self-colored  beans  into  black  and 
buff.  These  appear  in  approximately  equal  numbers  and  both  breed 
true.  It  was  early  observed  that  buff  beans  generally  bred  true  in  all 
crosses,  and  comparatively  few  were  planted.  This  accounts  for  the 
small  numbers  given  in  the  right-hand  column  of  the  table.  Our  records 
show  some  half  dozen  plants  scattered  through  the  several  crosses  that 
were  called  smoky  black  or  brown.  None  of  them  were  self-fertilized, 
and  it  is  impossible  to  say  whether  they  represented  types  that  appear  in 
very  small  proportion,  whether  they  were  mutations,  or  whether  they  were 
the  result  of  environmental  conditions.  We  are  inclined  to  attribute  them 
to  the  last-named  influence.     If  the  constitution  of  Blue  Pod  Butter  is 


90 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    185. 


represented  by  the  formula  PTYzmG,  and  that  of  the  black  wax  varieties 
by  PTyZMG,  either  or  both  having  possible  additional  hypostatic  de- 
terminers, we  have  in  effect  a  simple  monohybrid  based  on  the  presence 
or  absence  of  the  modifier  M  with  its  accompanying  mottling  factor  Z. 
This  gives  a  proportion  3M:lm.  Two  of  the  plants  carrying  the  modifier 
are  heterozygous  and  mottled,  while  one  is  homozygous  and  is  solid 
black.  Inasmuch  as  Y  and  Z  are  confined  to  different  gametes,  according 
to  Emerson's  hypothesis,  no  zygote  PTyzm  is  possible.  Thus  we  have  the 
theoretical  proportion  1  black,  2  mottled,  1  buff,  which  is  borne  out  by 
the  facts  presented  in  the  table. 

Table  XVI.  —  Crosses  of  Blue  Pod  Butter  with  Black  Wax   Varieties. 


Parent  Varieties. 

Fi. 

F2. 

Fs  AND  F4. 

Cross 

GBO 

G  Par- 

B Par- 

No. 

Parents. 

ents. 

ents. 

G. 

GBO. 

B. 

G. 

GBO. 

B. 

G. 

B. 

3 

Blue  Pod  Butter  X  Chal- 
lenge Black  Wax. 

GEO 

21 

36 

18 

6 

25 

29 

53 

- 

4 

Challenge  Black  Wax  X  Blue 
Pod  Butter. 

GBO 

64 

110 

53 

11 

29 

14 

71 

8 

5 

Blue  Pod  Butter  X  Currie,  . 

GBO 

5 

20 

7 

2 

2 

1 

37 

- 

6 

Currie  X  Blue  Pod  Butter,  . 

GBO 

23 

33 

13 

28 

64 

26 

134 

- 

9 

Blue  Pod  Butter  X  German 
Black  Wax. 

GBO 

6 

4 

6 

- 

- 

- 

21 

- 

10 

German  Black  Wax  X  Blue 
Pod  Butter. 

GBO 

15 

47 

12 

11 

25 

15 

23 

- 

21 

Blue  Pod  Butter  X  Prolific 
Black  Wax. 

GBO 

48 

73 

48 

27 

52 

26 

253 

43 

22 

Prolific  Black  Wax  X  Blue 
Pod  Butter. 

GBO 

31 

70 

34 

45 

81 

46 

68 

70 

The  variety  Bountiful  has  seeds  that  bear  some  resemblance  to  those 
of  Blue  Pod  Butter.  They  have  been  recorded  bj^  the  same  symbol,  B. 
The  flowers  are  pink  instead  of  crimson,  and  the  plants  do  not  show  the 
marked  purplish  tinge.  It  has  been  used  in  crossing  to  a  limited  extent 
only.  In  Table  XVII.  are  tabulated  the  results  of  crosses  with  two  black 
wax  varieties.  From  the  results  of  other  crosses  we  have  assigned  to  the 
black  wax  varieties  the  black,  brown  and,  in  some  cases  at  least,  the 
yellow  determiner.  In  these  crosses  with  Bountiful  all  these  colors  appear 
as  well  as  the  H  color,  the  behavior  of  which  we  do  not  clearly  under- 
stand. This  indicates  that  Bountiful  does  not  possess  any  of  these  de- 
terminers. Buff-colored  beans  appear  only  in  small  numbers,  indicating 
that  it  does  not  lack  the  modifier  M.  If  we  assign  to  Bountiful  the  formula 
PTyZMgfc,  and  to  the  black  wax  varieties  the  formula  PTyZMGFC, 
the  results  of  crossing  would  be  in  harmony  with  the  limited  data  shown 
in  Table  XVII. 


SEED  COAT  COLOR  IN  GARDEN  BEANS. 


91 


cq 


O 


^ 


PQ 

< 


IS     • 

«■ 

1 

1                <o            1 

«  w 

^ 

i 

« 

w 

CO 

1                         1                   1 

P^ 

o 

'^ 

W 

1 

1                         1                00 

fe 

P3 

1 

1              1           1 

tM 

aj 

0 

% 

w 

•^ 

«rt          1           1 

z 

f^ 

U 

>o 

— I-H  «5           1                   ( 

fi< 

•*                     «                 1 

PQ 

tc 

w 

H 

-< 

u 

(1, 
O 

(in" 

1               1     CO-H             1                       1 

^^ 

r^t>.c^^fc'^J«oec)Oi 

d 

(M 

ffl 

,                ^^           ^^ 

E^ 

w 

d 

-' 

-H                     1                 1 

M                       1                   1 

fe 

to                     t^              CM 

o 

fe 

a 

o        o      o 

o 

£        o      m 

oi 

^ 
^ 

titiful 

Wax 

tiful 

H 
1 

5 

Bou 

lack 
Boun 

> 
H 

a 
a 
B 

n 

ax  (G)  X 

Prolific  E 

X  (G)X 

a 

X 

^         x;      1 

fL, 

£ 
3 

an  Black 

tiful  (B) 
So  Black 

a 

S             c        — 

3 

£             3-3 

o 

P3 

o         m       cu 

« 

lO                     W3               CO 

r^Z 

C<5 

CO                     CO               CO 

U 

92 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    185. 


The  Behavior  of  the  Determiners  of  the  Red  Series. 
According  to  the  hypothesis  already  presented  (see  page  82),  some 
varieties  carry  a  modifier  which  gives  rise  to  a  series  of  colors  different 
from  the  yellow-black  series  just  considered.  Only  two  members  of  this 
series  have  been  clearly  recognized  in  this  work,  —  one  a  dark  or  purplish 
red  designated  by  E,  seen  in  Mohawk,  and  a  lighter  red  seen  in  Red 
Valentine  which  we  have  called  D.  Beans  of  the  darker  shade  are  changed 
to  the  lighter  on  immersing  in  acid  solutions,  and  a  reversal  of  this  is  seen 
on  treatment  with  a  solution  of  potassium  hydrate.  The  darker  alkaline 
color  seems  to  be  dominant,  and  the  limited  data  presented  in  Table 
XVIII.  indicate  that  crosses  of  these  determiners  behave  as  a  simple 

Table  XVIII.  —  Crosses  of  Light  Red  with  Dark  Red  Varieties. 


Parent  Varieties. 

Fi. 

F3   AND   F4. 

Cross 
No. 

F2. 

E  Parents. 

D  Par- 
ents. 

E. 

D. 

E. 

D. 

D. 

215 
258 

Golden  Carmine  X  Mohawk, 
Red  Valentine  X  Keeney  Rustless, 

E 

2 
26 

9 

81 

16 
26 

7 

62 

monohybrid.  As  no  light  red  beans  appear  in  cross  215,  both  Golden 
Carmine  and  Mohawk  must  carry  the  factor  E.  No  signs  of  a  buff- 
colored  bean  have  appeared  in  cross  258,  therefore  it  is  assumed  that 
both  Red  Valentine  and  Keeney  Rustless  carry  the  factor  D,  while  the 
latter  variety  carries  the  factor  for  the  purplish  red  determiner  E,  which 
is  lacking  in  Red  Valentine. 

The  relations  of  Blue  Pod  Butter  and  the  several  varieties  of  the  yellow- 
black  series  have  already  been  discussed.  Table  XIX.  shows  in  a  similar 
way  the  relations  of  Blue  Pod  Butter  and  varieties  of  the  red  series.  The 
hypothesis  of  the  "red"  modifier  M'  as  necessary  for  the  expression  of 
these  colors  has  already  been  advanced.  Upon  this  hypothesis  and  that 
of  the  two  determiners  E  and  D  the  facts  shown  in  the  table  can  be  fairly 
well  explained,  though  a  few  cases  are  rather  difficult  of  explanation. 
Blue  Pod  Butter  carries  the  determiner  E  but  lacks  the  modifier  M'. 
When  this  is  supplied  by  crossing  with  Red  Valentine,  Low  Champion  or 
Warwick,  dark  red  E  beans  appear  in  dominant  proportions.  For  some 
reason  the  Fi  beans  in  the  Warwick  crosses  appear  to  have  been  lighter  in 
color,  and  were  recorded  as  light  red,  or  D.  In  later  generations  undoubted 
dark  red  beans  appear.  WTiether  this  is  due  to  some  environmental 
influence  or  to  an  unknown  genetic  influence  cannot  be  stated.  This 
has  been  recorded  in  two  different  years,  and  can  hardly  be  an  error  of 
observation. 


SEED  COAT  COLOR  IN  GARDEN  BEANS. 


93 


Table  XIX.  —  Crosses  of  Blue  Pod  Butter  with   Varieties  of  the  Red 

Series. 


Fa 

AND   F4. 

Fs. 

Cross 

Parent  Vahieties. 

Fi. 

E  Parents. 

D  Par- 

No. 

ents. 

E. 
16 

D. 

7 

B. 

7 

E. 
26 

D. 

B. 

17 

D. 

B. 

23 

Blue  Pod  Butter  (B)  X  Red  Valen- 

Dark red 

_ 

tine  (D). 

16 

343  \ 
347/ 

Blue  Pod  Butter  (B)  X  Low  Cham- 

Dark red 

30 

14 

12 

7 

4 

7 

30 

16 

pion  (D). 

y 

17 

57 

7 

3 

11 

29 

Blue  Pod  Butter  (B)  X  Warwick  (D), 

Light  red 

26 

13 

10 

17 

9 

98 

39 

5 
29 

7 
3 

63 

64 

29 

30 

Warwick  (D)  X  Blue  Pod  Butter  (B), 

Light  red 

75 

30 

51 

44 

16 

- 

28 

- 

19 

Blue  Pod  Butter  (B)  X  Mohawk  (E), 

Dark  red 

8 

1 

1 

10 
16 

4 

6 

36 

- 

20 

Mohawk  (E)  X  Blue  Pod  Butter  (B), 

Dark  red 

6 

1 

4 

- 

- 

- 

- 

27 

Blue  Pod  Butter  (B)  X  Wardwell  (E), 

Dark  red 

5 

- 

4 

34 

78 
4 

7 
3 

8 
18 

11 

1 

28 

Wardwell  (E)  X  Blue  Pod  Butter  (B), 

Dark  red 

25 

8 

10 

28 
46 
49 
43 

13 
16 

21 
11 

39 

The  Interrelations  of  the  Yellow-black  and  Red  Series, 
All  the  varieties  showing  pigments  of  the  red  series  are  mottled  beans 
with  the  exception  of  Warren,  and  Warren  has  not  been  crossed  with 
varieties  of  the  yellow-black  series.  Therefore  all  crosses  between  red 
and  yellow-black  varieties  shown  in  Table  XX.  are  mottled  in  the  &st 
generation.  Owing  to  this  fact  the  colors  of  both  series  may  usually  be 
seen  on  examination  of  the  Fi  beans.  It  is  possible  to  separate  the  beans 
of  the  F2  generation  into  three  classes,  as  shown  in  the  table.  The  yellow- 
brown  beans  are  partly  self-colored  and  partly  mottled,  showing  only 
yellow-brown  or  black,  as  the  case  may  be.  A  larger  number  are  mottled, 
showing  these  colors  and  also  light  or  dark  red,  or  both.  A  third  class 
shows  only  red,  and  these  are  always  mottled.  No  solid  red  bean  of  any 
shade  of  color  has  ever  appeared  from  the  crosses  shown  in  Table  XX. 
All  plants  listed  in  the  yellow-black  column  breed  true  to  these  colors, 
and  the  same  is  true  of  those  belonging  to  the  class  of  red  beans.  Those 
in  the  middle  column  break  up  exactly  like  the  Fi  generation.  These 
facts  are  shown  in  the  columns  under  F3  and  F4. 

In  crosses  198,  119,  191,  194,  115  and  52,  buff  beans  appear  in  small 
numbers  in  F3  and  F4,  but  none  have  been  observed  in  the  F2  generation. 
In  the  other  crosses  more  have  been  observed.  If  the  parent  varieties 
possess  a  determiner  in  common  the  chances  of  a  buff  bean  appearing 
would  be  small,  and  this  may  explain  their  absence.    Probably  if  the 


94 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    185. 


numbers  involved  were  larger  they  would  appear  in  many  crosses  where 
they  are  not  shown. 

According  to  the  hypotheses  already  advanced,  these  crosses  involve 
varieties  whose  constitution  may  be  expressed  by  PYZmM'  X  PyZMm', 
each  variety  possessing  one  or  more  determiners  in  addition.  The  mottled 
beans  of  the  yellow-black  series,  appearing  from  these  crosses,  are  the 
heterozygotes  lacking  the  determiners  E  and  D.  No  such  beans  have 
bred  true. 

Table  XX.  —  Crosses  of  Varieties  of  the  Yellow-black  loith  the  Red  Series. 


Parent  Varieties. 

Fa   AND   F4. 

Cross 
No. 

F2. 

y-b-|-r  Parents. 

y-b  Par- 
ents. 

tPar- 

ents. 

y-b. 

y-b-fr. 

r. 

y-b. 

y-b-fr. 

r. 

y-b. 

r. 

240 

239 

198 

57 

58 

288 
119 
95 
201 

191 
193 
194 
115 

116 
52 

Golden  Eyed  Wax  (y-b)  X  Red 

Valentine  (r). 
Red  Valentine  (r)  X  Golden 

Eyed  Wax  (y-b). 
Red    Valentine    (r)    X    Giant 

Stringless  (y-b). 
Burpee  Stringless  (y-b)  X  Red 

Valentine  (r). 
Red  Valentine  (r)  X  Burpee 

Stringless  (y-b). 

Red  Valentine  (r)  X  Prolific 
Black  Wax  (y-b). 

Currie  (y-b)  X  Red  Valen- 
tine (r). 

Challenge  Black  Wax  (y-b)  X 
Warwick  (r). 

Giant  Stringless  (y-b)  X  Ward- 
well  (r). 

Giant  Stringless  (y-b)  X 
Keeney  Rustless  (r). 

Giant  Stringless  (y-b)  X  Mo- 
hawk (r). 

Mohawk  (r)  X  Giant  String- 
less (y-b). 

Currie  (y-b)  X  Mohawk  (r),    . 

Mohawk  (r)  X  Currie  (y-b),    . 

Keeney  Rustless  (r)  X  Burpee 
Stringless  (y-b). 

12 
5 

20 

10 
21 
13 
20 

1 

2 

2 

49 

8 
3 

36 
20 

55 

15 
36 
14 
33 

3 

6 

5 

90 

19 
6 

15 

10 

8 

5 
17 

2 
11 

1 

6 

8 

32 

9 

2 

12 

8 

18 

20 

25 
12 
13 
10 

11 
3 
3 

23 
11 

7 
9 

17 

27 

11 
16 
15 
2 

7 

16 
12 
41 
11 

44 

17 
9 

5 

7 

32 
14 
13 

18 

4 

49 

10 

10 
U 

11 

16 
6 
4 

7 

16 
29 

10 

11 

2 

8 

6 

9 

1 

13 

6 
6 

2 

3 

80 

41 
25 
102 

202 

117 
36 

85 

24 
30 

72 

15 

76 

26 

5 

37 
15 

8 
25 

A  detailed  study  of  the  records  of  the  progeny  of  crosses  like  those 
shown  in  Table  XX.,  giving  consideration  to  the  manifestation  of  the 
various  pigments,  leads  to  conclusions  already  advanced  in  the  discussion 
of  the  crosses  belonging  within  each  series  (page  84).  Some  five  or  six 
varieties  of  red  mottled  beans  have  been  crossed  with  a  similar  number 
belonging  to  the  yellow-black  series.  The  results  do  not  lend  themselves 
readily  to  tabular  presentation,  therefore  they  are  dealt  with  in  a  text 
discussion.    These  facts  are  in  addition  to  those  shown  in  Table  XX. 

Red  Valentine  crossed  with  Golden  Eyed  Wax  yields  buff  beans  in 


SEED  COAT  COLOR  IN  GARDEN  BEANS.      95 

small  numbers,  indicating  that  these  parents  possess  no  determiners  in 
common.  One  plant  with  red  mottled  beans  yielded  in  the  next  genera- 
tion red  mottled  and  buif  beans  in  the  proportion  of  3:1,  indicating  that 
the  parent  plant  was  heterozygous  for  the  factors  M  and  D.  Red  Valen- 
tine X  Giant  Stringless  gives  results  of  the  same  nature,  and  they  indi- 
cate the  same  constitution  as  that  of  Golden  Eyed  Wax.  In  one  cross  of 
these  two  varieties,  dark  red  and  even  black  beans  appeared.  This  is  so 
contrary  to  the  usual  exjierience  that  it  is  thought  they  are  due  to  acci- 
dental crossing  in  the  field,  or  some  other  accident  of  similar  nature. 

In  crosses  of  Red  Valentine  with  Burpee  Stringless  we  have  coffee 
brown,  yellow  and  light  red  mottled  beans,  as  would  be  expected  from 
the  formulae  already  advanced.  Buff  beans  also  appear  in  small  numbers, 
indicating  that  these  two  varieties  have  no  determiner  in  common.  Dark 
red  mottled  beans  appear  in  numbers  greater  than  those  of  light  red 
mottled  beans,  and  so  distributed  as  to  make  it  doubtful  if  they  are  the 
result  of  accident.  Their  presence  can  be  explained  on  the  supposition 
that  Burpee  Stringless  carries  the  determiner  E.  Small  numbers  of  olive- 
brown,  or  H,  beans  appear  as  in  other  similar  crosses.  The  constitution 
indicated  for  Burpee  Stringless  is  PTyZMm'FCEd,  which  is  in  harmony 
with  the  one  previously  advanced. 

Dark  red  mottled  beans  have  been  extracted  from  crosses  of  Red 
Valentine  with  Prolific  Black  Wax,  indicating  that  Prolific  Black  Wax 
carries  the  alkaline  determiner  E.  This  type,  self-fertilized,  yields  dark 
red  mottled  and  light  red  mottled  beans  in  the  proportion  25:12,  probably 
a  simple  3:1  ratio.  Buff  beans  also  appear  in  small  numbers,  indicating 
that  these  two  sorts  have  no  determiner  in  common.  Coffee  brown,  or 
F,  beans  appear  in  considerable  numbers,  and  when  selfed  sometimes 
breed  true,  or  may  yield  yellow  (C),  buff  (B)  and  olive-brown  (H)  beans 
in  proportions  subordinate  to  the  coffee  brown.  In  this  as  in  other  crosses 
involving  Red  Valentine,  the  parent  type,  light  red  mottled,  always 
breeds  true  when  extracted. 

Warwick  has  a  coat  color  apparently  very  similar  to  or  identical  with 
Red  Valentine.  The  blossom  color  is  light  pink,  while  the  usual  strains 
of  Red  Valentine  are  white.  This  indicates  a  different  pigmentation  for 
the  two  varieties,  which  may  or  may  not  affect  the  color  of  the  seed  coat. 
When  crossed  with  Challenge  Black  Wax,  Warwick  gives  in  the  Fi  genera- 
tion a  mottled  bean  showing  black  and  red  similar  to  those  where  Red 
Valentine  is  involved.  In  later  generations  there  is  a  greater  complexity 
among  the  mottled  beans.  Coffee-brown  and  yellow  beans  are  extracted, 
also  the  buff,  or  B  beans,  all  in  rather  small  numbers.  These  solid-colored 
beans  all  breed  true  or  yield  other  hypostatic  or  recessive  colors  in  com- 
paratively simple  proportions.  Among  the  mottled  beans  various  shades 
of  black,  violet,  brown,  red  and  yellow  may  be  seen,  and  in  addition  the 
buff  color  always  showing  in  mottled  beans.  Beans  of  these  complex 
colors  segregate  into  self-colored  beans  or  mottled  beans  of  less  complex 
natures.    We  have  observed  no  case  where  a  mottled  bean  showing  colors 


96         MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    185. 

of  both  the  red  and  yellow-black  series  has  bred  true.  From  crosses 
similar  to  the  one  just  discussed  we  have  extracted  black  mottled  beans 
similar  to  Refugee  that  have  bred  true,  though  not  in  large  numbers. 

Mohawk  has  a  seed  coat  color  somewhat  similar  to  Red  Valentine  and 
Warwick,  but  the  red  color  is  darker  and  is  changed  to  a  bright  red  by- 
acid  solutions.  It  is  assumed  to  carry  the  alkaline  modifier  E.  When 
crossed  with  Giant  Stringless  it  yields  in  r2  numerous  plants  with  coffee- 
brown  beans,  indicating  that  Mohawk  carries  the  determiner  F.  When 
crossed  with  Burpee  Stringless  no  yellow  beans  appear,  for  both  these 
varieties  carry  F,  and  the  hypostatic  yellow  color  cannot  appear. 

Keeney  Rustless  crossed  with  Burpee  Stringless  yields  many  black  beans. 
This  may  be  explained  by  assuming  that  Keeney  Rustless  carries  the  black 
determiner  G  but  not  the  modifier  M,  which  prevents  the  appearance  of 
the  black  color.  It  does  carry  M'  and  E,  and  is  therefore  a  dark  red  bean. 
Burpee  Stringless  supplies  the  modifier  M  which  with  the  determiner  G 
brings  forth  the  black  color.  The  cross  Keeney  Rustless  X  Burpee  String- 
less may  be  expressed  by  PmM'GfcED  X  PMm'gFC.  It  is  probable  that 
Burpee  Stringless  carries  an  E  also.  Buff-colored  beans  appear  in  this 
cross,  indicating  a  lack  of  common  determiners. 

Wardwell  crossed  with  Giant  Stringless  and  Burpee  Stringless  yields 
progenies  similar  to  those  resulting  from  a  cross  of  the  latter  two  varieties 
with  Mohawk  so  far  as  pigments  are  concerned.  Both  Mohawk  and 
Wardwell  carry  the  determiner  F,  but  it  is  not  expressed  owing  to  the  lack 
of  the  modifier  M.  "When  this  is  supplied  by  Giant  Stringless  or  Burpee 
Stringless  coffee-brown  flecks  appear  in  the  mottled  beans,  and  various 
types  of  mottled  beans  and  both  mottled  and  self-colored  beans  of  the 
yellow-black  series  may  be  isolated. 

Crosses  involving  CreasebacJc. 

In  Table  VI.  were  presented  the  manifestation  of  color  patterns  in 
crosses  of  Creaseback  with  Blue  Pod  Butter  and  Challenge  Black  Wax.  In 
Table  XXI.  are  shown  the  same  crosses,  giving  the  proportion  of  plants 
exhibiting  the  various  seed  coat  pigments  involved.  In  the  discussion  of 
Table  VI.  (page  74)  it  was  brought  out  that  Creaseback  must  carry  the 
determiner  G,  and  its  formula  according  to  the  hypotheses  followed  is 
pyZMG.  As  soon  as  the  factor  for  pigment  is  introduced  by  Blue  Pod 
Butter,  which  may  be  assumed  to  have  here  the  formula  PYzmG,  black 
beans  appear  making  up  all  the  Fj  generation,  and  in  F2  there  follows  what 
is  probably  a  9 :3 :4  proportion  with  the  buff  of  Blue  Pod  Butter  and  white. 
The  exact  proportion  is  9.21:2.55:4.31  when  all  lots  sho-^ving  the  three 
colors  are  combined.  Where  black  seed  parent  plants  show  only  buff  or 
white  progeny  besides  black,  and  where  buff  seed  parent  plants  yield 
white  seeded  progeny,  there  is  evidently  a  simple  3:1  proportion. 

In  cross  97,  Challenge  Black  Wax  X  Creaseback,  there  is  evidently  a 
simple  3 : 1  proportion  based  on  the  presence  or  absence  of  the  factor  for 
pigmentation.    Cross  97  as  tabulated  is  derived  in  part  from  a  cross  made 


SEED  COAT  COLOR  IN  GARDEN  BEANS. 


97 


in  1909  and  in  part  from  a  cross  made  in  1911,  which  exhibited  similar 
behavior.  In  the  1911  cross  there  were  four  Fj  plants,  two  of  which  gave 
the  progeny  just  referred  to,  and  the  other  two  gave  the  progeny  shown 
in  cross  97a.  Why  these  show  such  a  different  proportion  we  do  not  know, 
for  97a  must  have  been  a  successful  cross,  as  proved  by  the  appearance 
of  pole  beans  in  normal  proportions.  It  may  be  that  the  pollen  grains 
were  not  of  the  same  constitution,  or  possibly  stray  pollen  grains  carry- 
ing only  black  were  involved  in  the  F^  generation.  The  facts  are  here 
presented  in  the  hope  that  they  may  be  suggestive  to  some  other 
investigator. 

Table  XXI.  —  Crosses  involving  Creaseback. 


F2. 

F3  AND   F4. 

Cross 

Parent  Varieties. 

fi. 

G  Parents. 

B  Par- 

No. 

ents. 

G. 

Ill 

B. 
33 

A. 
65 

G. 

155 

B. 
46 

A. 

67 

B. 

61 

A. 

31 

Blue  Pod  Butter  X  Creaseback, 

G 

21 

118 

33 

131 

34 

119 

32 

Creaseback  X  Blue  Pod  Butter, 

G 

55 

13 

33 

66 
75 
103 
65 

14 
31 

16 
22 

97 

Challenge  Black  Wax  X  Creaseback, 

G 

295 

- 

79 

269 
136 

- 

75 

- 

- 

97a 

Challenge  Black  Wax  X  Creaseback, 

G 

101 

1 

29 
60 

2 

" 

Crosses  of  other  varieties  with  Creaseback  are  not  shown  in  the  table 
because  the  results  were  complicated  and  somewhat  uncertain.  With 
Golden  Eyed  Wax  the  Fi  generation  gave  only  black  beans,  and  in  F2, 
10  black  to  3  white.  In  F3  and  F4  there  appeared  also  coffee-brown  (F) 
and  yellow  (C)  seeded  plants  in  moderate  numbers.  One  coffee-brown 
plant  bred  true  in  the  9  progeny  grown. 

When  crossed  with  Warwick  the  results  were  complicated  beyond  hope 
of  comprehension.  In  the  cross  Creaseback  X  Warwick  the  Fi  generation 
is  recorded  as  black  with  faint  signs  of  mottling,  while  in  the  reciprocal, 
which  may  have  involved  a  different  strain  of  the  parent  varieties,  the 
Fi  beans  were  distinctly  mottled,  showing  many  distinct  shades  of  pig- 
ments. Apparently  about  all  the  pigments  of  both  the  red  and  yellow- 
black  series  were  involved. 

The  behavior  of  the  pigments  in  these  reciprocal  crosses  does  afford 
some  further  evidence  bearing  on  the  hypothesis  of  a  factor  discussed  on 
page  75  and  there  called  X.  One  strain  of  Warwick  X  Creaseback  gives 
the  expected  number  of  white  beans,  the  ratio  being  24  self-colored,  5 
mottled  and  9  white.  Another  strain  yields  no  white  beans  but  gives  30 
self-colored  and  7  mottled  in  both  cases,  approximately  four  times  as 


98 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    185. 


many  self-colored  as  mottled.  If  there  is  a  factor  X  in  Creaseback  which 
inhibits  the  expression  of  mottling  as  previously  suggested,  the  following 
gametes  should  be  formed:  PYZX,  pYZX,  PyZX,  pyZX,  PYZx,  pYZx, 
PyZx,  pyZx.  The  zygotes  formed  would  yield  9  mottled  without  X,  27 
withX;  12  self-colored  and  16  white.  The  27  "mottled"  beans  with  X 
do  not  show  mottling,  making  a  to^al  of  39  self-colored,  9  mottled  and 
16  white,  or  nearly  four  times  as  many  self-colored  as  mottled.  Of  the 
mottled  beans  6  should  show  colors  of  both  series,  and  3  those  of  the  red 
series  only,  which  are  the  actual  numbers  shown  in  the  F2  generation  of 
this  cross. 

Crosses  involving  Davis  Wax. 
As  has  already  been  shown,  Davis  Wax,  a  non-pigmented  bean,  carries 
factors  for  light  mottling  which  appear  as  soon  as  pigment  is  supplied. 
When  crossed  with  Blue  Pod  Butter  the  Fi  generation  is  light  mottled, 
like  beans  of  the  Horticultural  group.  In  F2  there  are  produced  light  mot- 
tled, buff  and  white  beans  in  the  proportion,  presumably,  of  9:3:4.  In 
later  generations  these  behave  as  shown  in  Table  XXII.    It  is  possible 

Table  XXII.  —  Crosses  involving  Davis  Wax. 


Cross 
No. 

Parent  Varieties. 

Fi. 

Fo. 

F3   AND   F4 

(BEP  Parents). 

BEP. 

B. 

A. 

BEP. 

B. 

A. 

7 
8 

Blue  Pod  Butter  X  Davis  Wax,    . 
Davis  Wax  X  Blue  Pod  Butter,    . 

BEP 
BEP 

14 
38 

3 
16 

6 

22 

50 

17 

49 

8 

53 

0 
10 
3 

18 

12 
16 

to  derive  from  this  cross  light  mottled  races  that  breed  true  as  well  as 
the  parent  types,  as  is  shown  in  the  table.  No  black  beans  appear,  as  the 
modifier  M  is  not  present. 

Among  these  light  mottled  progeny  there  appear  some  plants  that 
produce  what  seem  to  be  bud  sports,  in  which  the  darker  reddish  color 
predominates  over  the  surface  of  the  bean.  These  may  appear  as  single 
pods  or  as  branches  bearing  several  pods,  and  rarely  a  portion  only  of 
the  beans  in  a  single  pod  is  affected.  If  these  dark  mottled  beans  are 
planted  they  breed  true  to  seed  coat  color,  while  the  plants  with  light 
mottled  seed  may  breed  true  in  this  character,  or  may  give  rise  to  plants 
bearing  bud  sports  as  before.  Limited  observations  suggest  that  these 
sporting  plants  exist  in  definite  proportions.  The  fact  that  such  plants 
have  appeared  so  often  in  the  breeding  work  here  reported,  and  that  dark 
mottled  beans  are  frequently  seen  in  seed  of  varieties  of  the  Horticultural 
type  offered  for  sale,  suggests  that  this  peculiarity  of  bud  sporting  is  a 


SEED  COAT  COLOR  IN  GARDEN  BEANS.      99 

frequent  and  possibly  a  constant  character  of  beans  of  this  class.  At 
any  rate,  we  have  here  a  peculiarity  which  would  doubtless  yield  interest- 
ing results  on  further  and  more  specific  investigation. 

Reciprocal  crosses  of  Challenge  Black  Wax  and  Davis  Wax  yielded 
complicated  progenies.  Dark  mottled  beans  appear  because  the  former 
variety  carries  the  factor  O  for  dark  mottling,  which  acts  with  YZ  from 
Da^^s  Wax  to  bring  about  this  result.  Challenge  Black  Wax  carries  the 
modifier  M,  and  Davis  Wax  brings  in  M',  so  that  we  get  beans  of  both 
the  yellow-black  and  red  series.  Owing  to  the  complicated  nature  of  the 
progeny  of  this  cross  it  is  not  shown  in  tabular  form. 

Crosses  involving  White  Marrow. 

The  only  other  white  variety  that  has  been  used  at  all  extensively  is 
White  Marrow.  The  color  pattern  factors  are  rather  complex,  and  the 
pigment  factors  much  more  so.  Owing  to  this  the  crosses  of  White  Marrow 
with  the  several  varieties  used  will  be  taken  up  one  by  one.  Apparently 
White  Marrow  carries  several  pigment  modifiers  and  determiners  in  a 
latent  condition,  owing  to  the  absence  of  the  pigmentation  factor  P. 
When  it  is  crossed  with  another  variety  carrying  P,  and  perhaps  several 
additional  modifiers  and  determiners,  we  have  very  many  classes  of 
beans  which  are,  extremely  difficult  to  segregate. 

Crosses  of  White  Marrow  and  Blue  Pod  Butter.  —  Three  crosses  of  these 
varieties  have  been  made,  including  reciprocals.  As  previously  indicated 
(page  73),  the  Fi  beans  have  light  red  (D)  stripes  and  splashes  on  the 
usual  buff  (B)  ground  color.  In  the  next  generation  these  split  up,  show- 
ing, in  addition  to  the  two  colors  mentioned  and  the  parent  forms,  con- 
siderable numbers  of  coffee-brown  (F)  and  yellow  (C)  beans.  No  black 
beans  have  appeared  in  this  cross,  a  fact  that  may  be  explained  on  the 
hypothesis  that  the  particular  strain  of  Blue  Pod  Butter  used  lacked  the 
factor  G. 

We  have  been  led  to  conclude  that  Blue  Pod  Butter  lacked  both  modifiers 
M  and  M'.  The  appearance  of  both  series  of  colors  in  the  progeny  of  this 
cross  leads  to  the  conclusion  that  White  Marrow  carries  both  modifiers 
in  an  inactive  state,  owing  to  the  lack  of  the  factor  P.  When  both  are 
present  the  M'  is  epistatic  to  M,  and  the  beans  are  classified  as  of  the 
red  series. 

Beans  showing  the  dark  red  color  have  yielded  in  some  cases  only  the 
parent  color  (E),  and  in  other  cases  various  combinations  of  dark  red 
(E),  light  red  (D),  yellow  (C),  buff  (B)  and  white,  but  we  have  no  record 
of  coffee-brown  beans  (F)  from  this  parentage,  though  they  do  appear  in 
small  numbers  from  light  red  (D)  parents.  Yellow  (C)  parent  plants 
yield  progeny  of  similar  color,  and,  in  addition,  buff  (B)  or  white  or  both 
in  subordinate  numbers.  In  a  few  cases  our  records  show  light  red  (D) 
beans  in  small  numbers,  which  occurrences  are  difficult  to  explain.  They 
are  rather  too  frequent  to  be  mere  accidents.  Further  investigation 
should  lead  to  interesting  results. 


100       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    185. 

Crosses  of  White  Marrow  with  Golden  Eyed  Wax.  —  The  progeny  of  this 
cross  are  less  complicated  than  others  having  White  Marrow  in  the 
parentage.  The  first  generation  beans,  being  mottled,  show  both  yellow 
and  red  splashes.  Those  of  the  F2  generation,  showing  only  yellow  either 
in  solid  color  or  mottling,  either  breed  true  or  yield  white  beans  in  the 
expected  ratio.  Among  some  three  hundred  plants  the  records  show  two 
buff  (B)  seeded  plants.  These  are  probably  accidental  strangers,  yet  they 
may  be  a  definite  class  occurring  in  smaU  numbers;  if  so,  no  explanation 
of  their  occurrence  can  be  presented. 

Crosses  of  White  Marrow  with  Burpee  Stringless.  —  Other  crosses  have 
shown  that  Burpee  Stringless  has  a  constitution  similar  to  Golden  Eyed 
Wax,  with  the  addition  of  the  determiner  F,  making  the  bean  coffee 
brown.  The  beans  of  the  Fi  generation  were  of  a  yellow-ohve  mottled 
color.  In  the  next  generation  a  variety  of  colors  appeared  among  the 
mottled  beans,  —  coffee  brown,  yellow,  olive,  chocolate  brown  and  red. 
In  later  generations  these  differentiated  clearly  into  the  coffee  brown  of 
Burpee  Stringless,  yellow  (C),  light  red  (D),  buff  (B)  and  white.  Self- 
colored  coffee-brown  seeds  have  given  all  brown,  brown  and  yellow,  brown 
and  white,  and  mixed  progeny  including  all  three  types.  Light  red, 
hght  mottled  seeds  have  bred  true,  and  have  yielded  white  seeded  plants 
in  the  usual  proportion  of  3:1. 

Crosses  of  White  Marrow  with  German  Black  Wax.  —  The  results  of  this 
cross  are  similar  to  the  previous  one  with  the  addition  of  the  epistatic 
black  (G).  There  is  the  same  confusion  of  colors  in  the  Fi  generation, 
but  on  further  segregation  they  separate  into  black,  coffee  brown,  yeUow 
and  white.  The  light  red  also  appears  and  apparently  dark  red  (E)  also, 
though  in  small  numbers. 

We  have  no  case  where  a  parent  plant  of  this  color  has  been  bred.  One 
yellow  seeded  plant,  being  selfed,  yielded  yellow  and  white  in  a  3:1  pro- 
portion, and  one  solid  black  of  the  F2  generation  yielded  a  mixture  of 
black  and  coffee  brown. 

Crosses  of  White  Marrow  with  Red  Valentine.  —  This  cross  differs  from 
those  just  considered  in  that  Red  Valentine  belongs  to  the  red  series. 
There  are  red,  black  or  brown  beans  appearing,  but  j^ellow  does  appear  in 
many  of  the  mottled  beans.  One  plant  of  mostly  sohd  yellow  beans  pro- 
duced a  progeny  of  yellow  and  light  red  mottled  beans,  the  former  in 
larger  numbers.  There  is  a  tendency  to  produce  the  dark  mottled  bud 
sports  referred  to  on  page  98.  There  are  other  complications  in  this  cross, 
some  of  which  can  be  explained  only  on  the  supposition  that  the  White 
Marrow  plant  used  as  a  parent  was  heterozygous  in  its  nature.  This 
might  well  be,  for  so  long  as  the  factor  P  is  absent  the  pigment  modifiers 
and  determiners  might  be  interchanged  without  the  external  appearancfe 
being  changed. 


SEED  COAT  COLOR  IN  GARDEN  BEANS. 


101 


The  Genetic  Constitution  of  the  Varieties  used. 

In  the  following  table  is  given  the  genetic  constitution  as  indicated  by 
the  investigations  here  reported.  It  is  not  asserted  that  these  are  correct 
in  ail  cases,  even  should  the  general  hypotheses  here  presented  prove 
sound.  Moreover,  there  are  doubtless  in  a  given  variety  different  strains 
of  indistinguishable  external  appearances,  especially  among  the  non- 
pigmented  varieties. 


Blue  Pod  Butter, 

Bountiful,     . 
Burpee  Stringless, 
Challenge  Black  Wax, 

Creaseback, 

Currie, 

Davis  Wax, 

German  Black  Wax, 

Giant  Stringless,   . 

Golden  Carmine,  . 

Golden  Eyed  Wax, 

Keeney  Rustless,  . 

Longfellow, 

Low  Champion,    . 

Mohawk, 

ProUfic  Black  Wax, 

Red  Valentine, 

Wardwell,     . 

Warren, 
Warwick, 

White  Marrow, 


PTYzmm'oGfcHEd 

PTYzmm'oGFcHEd 

PTYzmm'ogFcHED 

PtYZmM'OgFCHED 

PTyZMm'OgFChEd 

PTyZMm'OGFChED 

pTYZMm'OXG 

pTyZMm'oXGFCHED 

PTyZMm'OGFcH 

PTyZMm'OGfCHED 

PTyZMm'OGfCHeD 

pTYZmM'oged 

PTyZMm'OGFCHED 

PTyZMm'OgfChEd 

PTYZmM'ogfchEd 

PtyZMm'OgfChed 

PtYZmM'OGfcHED 

PT  YZm  M'  Ogf  cheD 

PTyZmM'OeD 

PTYZmM'OgFcHED 

PTyZMm'OGFcHE 

PTYZmM'OgfcheD 

PTYZmM'OgfcHeD 

PTYZmM'OgfCheD 

PtYZmM'OgFcHED 

PTYzmM'ED 

PTYZmM'OgfcHeD 

pTYZMM'ogfCheD 

pTyZMM'ogfChedpTYz 

pTyZMM'ogfCheD 


The  significance  of  the  letters  is  as  follows :  — 

P  is  the  factor  for  pigmentation,  without  which  the  bean  is  white.  Pre- 
sumably this  factor  is  the  one  causing  the  production  of  the  basic  chro- 
mogen. 

T  is  the  factor  for  totality  of  pigmentation,  without  which  the  bean  is 
an  eyed  bean  if  P  is  present. 

Y  and  Z  are  the  factors  for  mottling,  which  are  coupled  in  mottled  vari- 
eties but  may  exist  separately  in  non-mottled  varieties,  and  if  brought 
together  in  crossing  give  mottled  beans  which  break  up  in  later  generations. 

M  and  M'  are  the  two  modifiers,  M  giving  rise  to  the  beans  of  the  yellow- 
black  series  and  M'  to  those  of  the  red  series.    They  doubtless  represent 


102       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    185. 

one  of  the  enzymes  that  are  beUeved  to  be  necessary  for  the  production 
of  sap  colors  in  plants. 

O  is  the  factor  for  dark  mottling  in  mottled  beans,  in  the  absence  of 
which  we  have  the  light  mottled  type  of  the  Horticultural  class,  provided 
P,  Y  and  Z  are  all  present. 

X  represents  a  blackening  factor  found  only  in  Creaseback. 

The  remaining  letters  of  the  formula  are  the  determiners  which  in  the 
presence  of  other  necessary  factors  determine  the  color  of  the  seed  coat. 
The  significance  of  the  colors  is  as  follows:  G,  black;  F,  coffee  brown; 
C,  yellow;  E,  dark  red;  D,  light  red  (see  page  84). 

Summary. 

It  is  evident  from  these  and  other  investigations  that  the  inheritance  of 
seed  coat  color  in  beans  is  very  comphcated,  and  difficult  to  explain  fully 
and  satisfactorily.  The  problems  involved  are  interesting,  and  the  plants 
convenient  to  handle  for  purposes  of  investigation.  They  provide  excel- 
lent material  for  the  fruitful  investigation  of  Mendelian  inheritance. 

In  this  work  21  varieties  have  been  used  in  making  over  120  different 
crosses,  involving  more  than  40,000  plants.  The  work  continued  over  a 
period  of  eight  years. 

There  are  certain  correlations  in  the  pigmentation  of  the  plant.  All 
white  or  eyed  beans  are  accompanied  by  white  flowers;  all  black  or  black 
mottled  beans  by  dark  pink  flowers.  Mottled  beans,  other  than  black 
mottled  beans  and  those  of  various  yellow  and  brown  colors,  are  usually 
accompanied  by  Hght  pink  flowers. 

In  a  general  way  the  crosses  of  pigmented  and  white  beans  show  a  3:1 
ratio,  but  there  are  some  rather  wide  departures  which  may  or  may  not 
be  of  genetic  significance. 

The  inheritance  of  mottling  may  be  explained  by  the  double  factor 
hypothesis  of  Emerson  and  Spillman.  Crosses  of  two  mottled  varieties 
have  in  all  cases  given  only  mottled  progeny.  Crosses  of  mottled  and 
self-colored  varieties  have  yielded  mottled  beans  in  Fj,  and  the  parent 
types  in  a  3:1  ratio  in  F2.  Crosses  of  mottled  and  white  varieties  have 
given  mottled  beans  in  Fi,  and  usually  mottled,  self-colored  and  white  in 
a  9:3:4  proportion  in  F2. 

In  most  cases  crosses  of  two  self-colored  varieties  have  given  only  self- 
colored  progeny.  The  principal  exceptional  variety  is  Blue  Pod  Butter, 
which,  when  crossed  with  most  self-colored  varieties,  yields  mottled 
progeny  none  of  which  breed  true  to  the  mottled  character.  White  vari- 
eties may  carry  the  character  for  mottling,  which  can  show  itself  only 
after  crossing  with  a  pigmented  sort.  Creaseback  is  peculiar  in  that  it 
seems  to  carry  factors  for  mottling  and  an  additional  factor  causing  a 
blackenmg  which  nearly  or  quite  obscures  the  mottled  pattern. 

There  are  two  types  of  mottling,  —  the  dark,  seen  in  Red  Valentine  and 
Refugee  and  many  others,  and  the  light,  seen  in  varieties  of  the  Horticul- 
tural class.    The  former  behaves  towards  the  latter  as  a  simple  dominant. 


SEED  COAT  COLOR  IN  GARDEN  BEANS.     103 

Apparently  the  factor  for  the  dark  motthng  is  associated  with  one  of  the 
mottling  factors.  "Wliite  beans  may  jdeld  light  mottled  beans,  but  none 
have  yielded  dark  mottled  beans. 

There  is  evidently  needed  to  produce  a  totally  pigmented  bean  a  factor 
for  total  pigmentation.  If  it  is  absent  when  the  factor  for  pigmentation 
is  present  we  have  an  eyed  bean.  Eye  size  is  evidently  governed  by  one 
or  more  factors,  but  these  investigations  do  not  afford  definite  data  regard- 
ing their  relations. 

Pigment  patterns  and  pigment  colors  are  controlled  by  distinct  factors. 
According  to  the  hypothesis  presented  in  this  paper,  any  color  shown  in 
a  bean  seed  is,  in  most  cases,  dependent  on  three  or  more  factors.  The 
basic  factor  for  pigmentation  may  be  modified  into  either  one  of  two 
series,  —  one  including  the  various  yellows,  browns  and  black;  and  the 
other,  different  shades  of  red.  The  third  factor,  called  a  determiner,  finally 
determines  what  the  color  is  to  be.  In  some  cases  the  determiners  bring 
about  the  color  through  causing  an  alkaline  or  acid  condition.  Possibly 
in  some  cases  the  color  is  determined  by  the  degree  of  acidity  or  alkalinity. 

The  two  modifiers  discovered  are  apparently  associated  with  one  of 
the  mottling  factors,  but  the  determiners  are  free  and  independent,  though 
standing  often  in  an  epistatic  or  hypostatic  relation  to  one  another. 

Bibliography. 

1.  Bateson,  W.    1902.    Mendel's  Principles  of  Heredity,  p.  78.    Cambridge. 

2.  Emerson,  R.  A.     1902.     Preliminary  Account  of  Variation  in  Bean  Hybrids. 

In  Nebr.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  15th  Ann.  Rpt.,  pp.  30-43. 

3.  .    1904.    Heredity  in  Bean  Hybrids.     In  Nebr.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  17th  Ann. 

Rpt.,  pp.  33-68. 

4.  .    1909.    Factors  for  Mottling  in  Beans.     In  Ann.  Rpt.  Amer.  Breeders' 

Assoc,  Vol.  5,  pp.  368-376. 

5.  .     1909.    Inheritanceof  Color  in  the  Seeds  of  the  Common  Bean.    In  Nebr. 

Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  22d  Ann.  Rpt.,  pp.  67-101. 

6.  .     1914.    The  Inheritance  of  a  Recurring  Somatic  Variation  in  Variegated 

Ears  of  Maize.    Nebr.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  Research  Bui.  4. 

7.  Freeman,  G.  F.     1912.    Southwestern  Beans  and  Teparies.    Ariz.  Agr.  Exp. 

Sta.  Bui.  68. 

8.  Halsted,  B.  D.    1905.    Notes  upon  Bean  Crosses.    In  N.  J.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  26th 

Ann.  Rpt.,  pp.  478-480. 

9.  .     1906.    Experiments  with  Bush  Beans.    In  N.  J.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  27th  Ann. 

Rpt.,  pp.  454-466. 

10.  .     1907.    Experiments  with  Bush  Beans.    In  N.  J.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  28th  Ann. 

Rpt.,  pp.  340-343. 

11.  Jarvis,  C.  D.     1908.    American  Varieties  of  Beans.    N.  Y.  Cornell  Agr.  Exp. 

Sta.  Bui.  260. 

12.  JoHANNSEN,  W.    1908.     Uber  Knospenmutation  bei  Phaseolus.     In  Zeitschrift 

fvir  Induktive  Abstammung  und  Vererbungslehre,  Band  1,  p.  1. 

13.  Kajanus,  Birger.     1914.     Zur  Genetik  der  Samen  von  Phaseolus  vulgaris. 

In  Zeitschrift  fiir  Pflanzenzuchtung,  Band  2,  p.  378. 

14.  Mann,  Albert.     1914.     Coloration  of  the  Seed  Coat  of  Cow  Peas.     In  Jour. 

Agr.  Research,  Vol.  2,  pp.  33-56. 

15.  Shaw,  J.  K.      1913.     The  Inheritance  of  Blossom  Color  in  Beans.     In  Mass. 

Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  25th  Ann.  Rpt.,  pp.  182-203. 


104       MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    185. 

16.  Shaw,  J.  K.    1911.    A  System  of  recording  Mendelian  Observations.    In  Amer. 

Nat.  Vol.  45,  p.  701. 

17.  Shull,  G.  H.    1907.    The  Significance  of  Latent  Characters.    In  Science,  Vol. 

25,  pp.  792-794. 

18.  .    1908.    A  New  Mendelian  Ratio  and  Several  Types  of  Latency.    In  Amer. 

Nat.  Vol.  42,  p.  433. 

19.  Tracy,  W.  W.,  Jr.     1907.    American  Varieties  of  Garden  Beans.    U.  S.  Dept. 

Agr.  Bur.  Plant  Indus.  Bui.  109. 

20.  TscHERMAK,  E.  VON.    1901.    Wcitere  Beitrage  iiber  Verschiedenwerthigkeit  der 

Merkmale  bei  Kreuzung  von  Erbsen  und  Bohnen.    In  Zeitschrift  fiir  das  land- 
wirthschaftliche  Versuchswesen  in  Oesterreich.    Band  4,  pp.  641-731. 

21.  .     1904.     Weitere  Kreuzungsstudien  an  Erbsen,  Levkojen  und  Bohnen. 

In  Zeitschrift  fiir  das  landwirthschaftliche  Versuchswesen  in  Oesterreich. 
Band  7,  pp.  533-638. 

22.  .     1912.     Bastardierungsversuche  an  Levkojen,  Erbsen  und  Bohnen  mit 

Riicksicht  auf  die  Faktorenlehre.    In  Zeitschrift  fiir  Induktive  Abstammung 
und  Vererbungslehre,  Band  7,  pp.  81-234. 


BULLETI]^   No.    186. 


DEPARTMENT    OF   CHEMISTRY. 


Part    I . 


THE   COMPOSITION,   DIGESTIBILITY  AND 
FEEDING   VALUE   OF   ALFALFA. 


BY  J.  B.   LINDSEY  AND   C.   L.  BEALS. 


SUMMARY  AND  SUGGESTIONS. 

1.  Green  aKalfa  contains  from  70  to  80  per  cent,  of  water,  2  to  2.5  per 
cent,  of  ash,  2.9  to  4.7  per  cent,  of  protein,  4.2  to  12.8  per  cent,  of 
fiber,  7.98  to  11.3  per  cent,  of  extract  or  starchy  matter,  and  not  over  1 
per  cent,  of  fatty  matter. 

2.  Alfalfa  hay  of  good  quality  should  average  about  14  per  cent,  of 
water,  and  on  this  basis  will  contain  some  7  to  9  per  cent,  of  ash,  13  to  14.5 
per  cent,  of  protein,^  27  to  33  per  cent,  of  fiber,  33  to  36  per  cent,  of  starchy 
matter  and  1.5  to  2  per  cent,  of  fat.  The  earlier  it  is  cut  the  less  fiber 
and  the  more  ash  and  protein  it  wiU  contain, 

3.  Alfalfa  resembles  red  clover  quite  closely  in  chemical  composition, 
although  it  is  like!}''  to  be  slightly  lower  in  protein  and  starchy  matter. 
Both  alfalfa  and  clover  contain  considerably  more  protein  and  less  fiber 
and  extract  matter  than  do  the  cereals  and  grasses. 

4.  A  complete  chemical  study  of  the  different  food  groups  composing 
the  alfalfa  has  not  been  made.  In  early  blossom  an  average  of  71.1  per 
cent,  of  its  total  nitrogen  has  been  found  to  exist  as  true  protein,  and  28.9 
per  cent,  as  non-albuminoid  nitrogen.  One  sample  has  shown  10.17  per 
cent,  in  the  form  of  amino  acids,  and  fully  88  per  cent,  as  true  protein. 
In  the  carbohydrate  group  from  3.9  to  16.8  per  cent,  of  pentosans,  and 
as  high  as  4.71  per  cent,  of  galactan,  have  been  found. 

5.  Alfalfa,  red  clover  and  timothy  hay  contain  about  the  same  amount 
of  digestible  organic  nutrients  in  1  ton  (950  to  970  pounds) ;  while  rowen 
averages  1,028  pounds,  or  8  per  cent,  more;  and  gluten  feed,  1,556  pounds, 
or  64  per  cent.  more. 

1  Cut  before  bloom,  alfalfa  may  contain  20  per  cent,  protein. 


106       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    186. 

6.  Comparing  these  several  feeds,  however,  on  the  basis  of  net  energy- 
values,  as  suggested  by  Armsby,  one  finds  red  clover  to  have  13  per  cent, 
more  energy  value,  timothy  hay  and  rowen  20  per  cent,  more,  and  gluten 
feed  160  per  cent.  more.  This  lessened  energy  value  of  the  alfalfa  has  been 
shown  to  be  due  to  its  causing  an  increased  metabolism  in  the  animal 
organism. 

7.  In  case  of  an  average  of  three  experiments  (I,  II  and  III)  with  cows, 
the  dry  matter  in  a  ration  composed  of  alfalfa,  beet  pulp  and  corn  meal 
produced  substantially  as  large  a  yield  of  milk  and  milk  ingredients  as 
did  a  like  amount  of  dry  matter  in  one  composed  of  first-cut  mixed  hay, 
beet  pulp  and  corn  gluten  products.  The  alfalfa  seemed  to  act  as  a  slight 
stimulus  to  production.  In  these  experiments  alfalfa  and  hay  each  fur- 
nished about  71  per  cent,  of  the  total  dry  food  of  the  rations. 

8.  The  animals  showed  a  total  gain  in  live  weight  of  13  poimds  on  the 
alfalfa  ration,  and  481  pounds  on  the  hay  ration,  indicating  that  the  less 
energy  value  of  the  alfalfa  might  have  been  responsible  for  this  difference. 

9.  The  protein  contained  in  the  alfalfa,  beet  pulp  and  corn  meal  ration, 
of  which  78.2  per  cent,  was  from  alfalfa,  seemed  to  be  fully  as  effective  in 
the  formation  of  normal  milk  as  did  the  protein  contained  in  the  hay,  beet 
pulp  and  corn  gluten  ration. 

10.  The  diuretic  effect  of  the  alfalfa  appeared  to  be  without  influence 
in  lessening  the  yield  of  milk  and  milk  ingredients. 

11.  In  case  of  the  average  of  two  experiments  (IV  and  V),  alfalfa  proved 
slightly  superior  to  rowen  in  the  volume  of  milk  produced.  The  difference, 
however  (4.2  per  cent,  on  the  basis  of  equal  amounts  of  dry  matter  in  the 
two  rations),  was  not  sufficient  to  warrant  any  marked  claim  of  superior- 
ity. This  slight  stimulating  effect  may  be  due  to  the  superiority  of  the 
protein  contained  in  the  alfalfa. 

12.  The  fat  percentage  in  the  milk  produced  on  the  alfalfa  ration  did 
not  keep  pace  with  the  increased  milk  yield,  for  a  like  amount  of  dry 
matter  in  the  alfalfa  and  rowen  rations  produced  a  like  amount  of  milk 
fat. 

13.  The  herd  made  a  total  gain  in  live  weight  of  16  pounds  on  the 
alfalfa  ration,  and  lost  a  total  of  24  pounds  on  the  rowen  ration,  differ- 
ences not  sufficient  to  warrant  any  particular  conclusion. 

14.  A  good  quality  of  rowen  appears  to  be  nearly  as  satisfactory  a 
source  of,  roughage  for  milk  production  as  a  like  amount  of  a  similar 
quality  of  alfalfa. 

15.  One  experiment  (VI)  showed  that  a  ration  composed  of  one-half 
first-cut  hay  and  one-half  alfalfa,  together  with  a  little  wheat  bran  and 
corn-and-cob  meal,  gave  as  satisfactory  results  as  one  consisting  of  first- 
cut  hay,  wheat  bran,  corn-and-cob  meal  and  gluten  feed.  The  former 
ration  contained  substantially  home-grown  products,  and  would  render  it 
unnecessary  to  purchase  grain,  the  alfalfa  furnishing  the  necessary  extra 
protein  required,  and  the  corn-and-cob  meal  the  necessary  extra  digesti- 
ble matter. 

16.  One  experiment  (VII)  indicated  that  reasonably  good  results  can 


FEEDING  VALUE  OF  ALFALFA.         107 

be  secured  from  a  roughage  ration  composed  of  two-thirds  alfalfa  and  one- 
third  corn  stover,  together  with  a  grain  ration  of  corn-and-cob  meal.  If 
the  stover  is  well  cured  and  kept  under  cover  it  will  give  more  satisfactory 
results  than  if  left  in  the  open  during  the  winter.  The  yield  of  milk,  how- 
ever, on  such  a  ration  would  not  be  quite  equal  to  the  yield  on  one  com- 
posed of  first-cut  hay  and  a  grain  mixture  of  equal  parts  of  wheat  bran, 
corn-and-cob  meal  and  gluten  feed. 

17.  Too  high  an  estimate  should  not  be  put  upon  the  alfalfa,  for  while 
studies  at  this  station  and  elsewhere  have  shown  it  to  contain  more  pro- 
tein than  most  other  sources  of  roughage,  and  to  equal  wheat  bran  in 
feeding  value,  it  is  quite  inferior  as  a  source  of  energy  or  fat  production 
to  most  of  the  concentrates. 

18.  In  the  light  of  our  present  knowledge  it  is  preferable,  particularly 
in  the  eastern  states,  not  to  use  alfalfa  as  the  entire  source  of  roughage 
for  milk  production,  but  to  feed  one-half  alfalfa  and  one-half  hay,  or  two- 
thirds  alfalfa  and  one-third  corn  stover,  or  10  to  15  pounds  of  alfalfa  and 
1  bushel  of  silage  daily.  Such  combinations,  together  with  a  grain  ration 
of  70  to  80  per  cent,  corn-and-cob  meal,  and  20  to  30  per  cent,  wheat 
bran  or  oats  or  barley,  ought  to  give  quite  satisfactory  results. 

INTRODUCTION. 

In  the  year  1914  this  station  published  Bulletin  No.  154,  entitled  "Al- 
falfa," which  related  primarily  to  the  growing  of  the  crop  in  Massachu- 
setts, based  upon  the  results  of  home  and  co-operative  experiments.  It 
included  specific  directions  for  the  general  management  of  the  crop. 

The  present  bulletin  summarizes  the  analyses  and  digestion  trials  made 
with  alfalfa,  both  at  this  station  and  elsewhere,  and  presents  the  results 
of  seven  feeding  experiments  relative  to  its  effect  on  milk  production  and 
its  place  in  the  dairy  ration. 

Alfalfa  belongs  to  the  same  family  of  plants  as  the  clover,  pea  and  bean. 
The  family  name  is  Leguminosa,  and  these  plants  are  usually  spoken  of 
as  legumes.  It  has  been  cultivated  both  in  Asia  and  Europe  for  a  long 
time,  being  known  in  Germany  and  France  under  the  name  of  Luzerne. 
It  has  been  grown  with  great  success  in  California  and  in  the  hot  semi- 
arid  regions  of  the  southwestern  portions  of  our  country.  Of  late  years  it 
has  been  cultivated  with  success  in  the  northwestern  States,  and  more 
recently  it  has  been  grown  with  considerable  success  in  different  portions 
of  the  Middle  Atlantic  and  New  England  States.  It  is  an  especially  deep- 
rooted  perennial,  and  needs,  among  other  things,  a  well-drained  soil  hav- 
ing a  water  table  several  feet  below  the  surface,  and  an  abundance  of  lime. 

THE  CHEMICAL  COMPOSITION  OF  ALFALFA  AND  RED 

CLOVER. 

The  composition  of  these  plants  will  vary  more  or  less,  depending  upon 
the  stage  of  growth  at  which  they  are  cut,  and  whether  the  material  is 
derived  from  the  first,  second  or  third  cutting.    The  analysis  of  medium 


108       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    186. 

red  clover  is  used  for  comparison.  In  order  to  make  the  analyses  com- 
parable, they  have  been  brought  (in  case  of  the  green  samples)  to  sub- 
stantially a  like  water  basis.  In  case  of  the  hays,  a  uniform  moisture 
content  of  14  per  cent,  has  been  employed. 


Table  I.  —  Chemical  Composition  of  Green  Alfalfa  and  Red  Clover. 


Num- 
ber of 
Analy- 
ses. 

Water 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Crude 
Ash 
(Per 

Cent.). 

Crude 
Protein 

(Per 
Cent.). 

Crude 

Fiber 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Extract 

or 
Starchy 
Matter 

(Per 
Cent.). 

Crude 
Fat 
(Per 

Cent.). 

Alfalfa,  average, '  . 
Alfalfa,  average,'  . 

Clover,  average, '  . 
Clover,  average,'  . 

Alfalfa,  before  bloom, ' 
Clover,  before  bloom,' 

Alfalfa,  in  bloom,' 
Clover,  in  bloom, ' 
Clover,  in  bloom,' 

Alfalfa,  in  seed,'   ., 
Clover,  in  seed,'    . 

r-    .  '■ 

143 
6 

85 
13 

11 
2 

27 

36 

3 

6 
2 

74.7 
74.7 

73.8 
73.8 

80.1 
80.0 

74.1 

72.5 
72.5 

70.2 
70.2 

2.4 
2.0 

2.1 
2.4 

2.3 
2.1 

2.5 
2.0 
2.5 

2.2 
2.7 

4.5 
3.4 

4.1 
4.1 

4.7 
3.6 

4.4 
4.1 
4.6 

2.9 
4.5 

7.0 

7.8 

7.3 
7.5 

4.2 
4.7 

7.8 
8.2 
7.9 

12.8 
8.6 

10.4 
11.5 

11.7 
11.5 

7.9 
9.0 

10.4 
12.1 
11.8 

11.3 
13.1 

1.0 
.5 

1.0 
.8 

.8 
.6 

.8 
1.1 

.8 

.6 

.8 

Table  II.  —  Chemical  Composition  of  Alfalfa  Hay  {Red  Clover  Hay  for 

Comparison). 


Num- 
ber of 
Analy- 
ses. 


Water 

(Per 

Cent.). 


Crude 
Ash 
(Per 

Cent.). 


Crude 
Protein 

(Per 
Cent.). 


Crude 

Fiber 

(Per 

Cent.). 


Ejrtract 

or 
Starchy 
Matter 

(Per 
Cent.). 


Crude 
Fat 
(Per 

Cent.). 


Alfalfa,  average, '  . 
Clover,  average, '  . 
Clover,  average,'  . 

Alfalfa,  first  cutting, '  . 
Alfalfa,  first  cutting,'  . 
Alfalfa,  second  cutting, ' 
Alfalfa,  second  cutting,' 
Alfalfa,  third  cutting, ' 

Alfalfa,  before  bloom,' 
Clover,  before  bloom, ' 
Clover,  before  bloom,' 

Alfalfa,  in  bloom, ' 
Clover,  in  bloom,' 

Alfalfa,  in  seed,  >   . 


250 
76 
15 

46 
3 

33 
1 

17 

11 

2 
1 

31 
1 


8.1 
7.0 

7.8 

8.3 
6.7 
8.3 
5.8 
9.0 

9.2 
6.9 
9.6 

9.3 

7.7 

6.7 


14.0 
12.6 
13.5 

13.1 

14.5 
13.6 
13.2 
13.8 

20.2 
17.9 
15.3 

13.9 
13.2 

11.7 


26.6 
25.2 
24.6 

29.0 
27.5 
29.6 
32.7 
26.8 

18.8 
17.6 
24.4 

28.1 
25.7 

26.5 


35.1 
38.1 
37.6 

34.0 
35.8 
32.9 
33.2 
34.7 

33.9 
40.1 
35.0 

33.0 
37.8 

38.7 


2.2 
3.1 
2.5 

1.6 
1.5 
1.6 
1.1 
1.7 

3.9 
3.5 
1.7 

1.7 
1.6 


A  study  of  the  analyses  of  both  the  alfalfa  and  clover  shows  that  these 
plants  resemble  each  other  closely  in  general  chemical  composition.    They 

'  Feeds  and  Feeding,  15th  edition,  1915,  Henry  &  Morrison. 

'  Analyses  made  at  the  Massachusetts  Agricultural  Experiment  Station. 


FEEDING  VALUE  OF  ALFALFA. 


109 


contain  considerably  more  protein  than  do  the  cereals  and  grasses,  and 
less  fiber  and  extract  matter.  If  anything,  the  alfalfa  is  likely  to  be 
slightly  richer  in  protein  than  the  clover,  and  to  contain  a  little  more 
extract  matter.  Much,  however,  depends  upon  the  exact  stage  of  growth, 
the  season  and  the  soil  on  which  the  crops  are  grown.  ^ 

THE  DIGESTIBILITY  OF  ALFALFA  HAY. 

The  general  statement  may  be  made  that  a  food  is  valuable  at  least  in 
so  far  as  the  animal  can  digest  and  assimilate  it.  A  large  number  of 
digestion  trials,  principally  with  sheep,  are  on  record,  of  which  the  fol- 
lowing is  a  summary:  — 


Table  III.  —  Coefficients  of  Digestibility  of  Alfalfa  Hay  {Other  Feeds  for 

Comparison) . 


Num- 
ber of 
Single 
Trials. 

Dry 

Matter 

(Per 
Cent.). 

Crude 
Ash 
(Per 

Cent.). 

Crude 
Protein 

(Per 
Cent.). 

Crude 

Fiber 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Extract 

or 
Starchy 
Matter 

(Per 
Cent.). 

Crude 
Fat 
(Per 

Cent.). 

Alfalfa,  average,  2  . 
Clover,  red,  average,' 

109 

25 

60 
59 

50' 
86' 

71 
59 

43 
64 

72 
66 

38 
57 

Alfalfa,  first  cutting,'   . 
Alfalfa,  second  cutting,' 
Alfalfa,  third  cutting,' 

53 

21 

6 

59 
62 
58 

54 » 
52' 
442 

67 
76 
70 

42 
44 
40 

72 
74 
70 

38 
40 
42 

Alfalfa,  bud  to  bloom,' 
Clover,  in  bloom,' 

74 
4 

60 
62 

58 

70 
62 

43 
53 

72 
68 

39 
54 

Corn  fodder,  dent,  mature  for 
comparison,' 

30 

66 

23 

45 

63 

73 

70 

Timothy,  average  for  com- 
parison,'    .... 

58 

55 

39 

48 

50 

62 

50 

Rowen  (largely  of  grasses),'  . 

12 

65 

- 

70 

66 

65 

47 

In  making  a  study  of  the  above  summary  one  notes,  in  case  of  the 
average  results,  that  the  digestibility  of  the  dry  matter  of  the  alfalfa  is 
about  the  same  as  of  the  clover.  The  crude  protein  of  the  alfalfa  is  no- 
ticeably more  digestible  than  that  of  the  clover  (12  per  cent,  more),  while 

1  As  alfalfa  begins  to  blossom,  its  nitrogen  content  has  been  found  to  consist  of  71.1  per  cent,  of 
true  protein  and  28.9  per  cent,  of  so-called  amids,  although  variations  from  these  averages  are  pro- 
nounced (Mentzel  u.  Lengerke's  Kalendar).  Hart  et  als..  Research  Bulletin  No.  33,  Wisconsin 
Experiment  Station,  found  in  a  sample  .31  per  cent,  of  its  nitrogen  in  the  form  of  ammonia,  1.03 
per  cent,  as  an  acid  amid,  and  10.17  per  cent,  as  amino  acids;  the  remainder,  88.49  per  cent.,  existed 
as  true  protein.  Headden,  in  Bulletin  No.  124,  Colorado  Experiment  Station,  gives  a  considerable 
amount  of  data  on  the  chemistry  of  alfalfa,  recognizing  sucrose,  glucose  and  starch,  2.89  per  cent, 
of  galactanand  from  11.44  to  13.38  per  cent,  of  pentosans.  Pott  (Handbuch  d.  thier.  Ernahrung 
II  Band  p.  55)  reports  from  13.9  to  16.8  per  cent,  of  pentosans.  Lindsey  and  Holland  found  4.71 
per  cent,  of  galactan  in  the  alfalfa  seed. 

'  Feeds  and  Feeding,  15th  edition,  1915,  Henry  &  Morrison. 

»  Lindsey's  compilation,  twenty-third  report  of  the  Massachusetts  Agricultural  Experiment 
Station,  1911.  "'""  "-.-—  -*  "  ........w  .^  ..u..  a  i,-^cuu>^  ■ 


110       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    186. 

the  crude  fiber  shows  a  lower  digestibility  (11  per  cent.  less).  The  extract 
matter  of  the  alfalfa  is  more  digestible  than  that  of  the  clover. 

The  second  cutting  of  alfalfa  hay  appears  to  be  more  digestible  than 
the  first  and  third  cuttings,  which  are  nearly  equal  in  digestibility. 

Comparing  alfalfa  in  bloom  with  clover  in  bloom,  one  notes  the  same 
differences  as  in  the  average  analyses  of  all  samples :  namely,  that  in  case 
of  the  alfalfa  the  crude  protein  and  extract  matter  are  more  digestible, 
and  the  crude  fiber  less  digestible,  than  in  the  clover  hay. 

A  comparison  of  our  own  results  tells  substantially  the  same  story,  as 
the  following  data  show:  — 


Table  IV.  —  Coefficients  of  Digestibility  of  Alfalfa  and  Clover  Hays  {Our 

Results) , 


Exrtact 

Num- 

Dry 

Crude 

Crude 

Crude 

or 

Crude 

ber  of 

Matter 

Ash 

Protein 

Fiber 

Starchy 

Fat 

Single 

(Per 

(Per 

(Per 

(Per 

Matter 

(Per 

Trials. 

Cent.). 

Cent.). 

Cent.). 

Cent.). 

(Per 
Cent.). 

Cent.). 

Alfalfa  hay, 

6 

60 

45 

74 

46 

70 

28 

Clover  hay,   .... 

4 

62 

58 

61 

53 

68 

54 

In  comparing  the  total  digestibility  of  alfalfa  hay  with  that  of  other 
feeds  we  have  the  following  figures:  alfalfa  and  clover,  about  60  per  cent.; 
timothy,  55  per  cent.;  rowen  (largely  of  grasses),  65  per  cent.;  dent  corn 
fodder,  66  per  cent.  It  is  evident,  therefore,  that  in  point  of  digestibility 
alfalfa  and  clover  are  rather  more  digestible  than  timothy  hay,  but  less 
digestible  than  mature  corn  fodder  or  well-cured  rowen. 

Applying  the  average  digestion  coefficients  to  the  average  analyses  of 
the  several  feeds,  we  have  the  following  digestible  nutrients  for  1  ton :  — 


Table  V.  —  Digestible  Nutrients  in  One  Ton. 


Crude 

Protein 

(Pounds). 

Crude 

Fiber 

(Pounds). 

Extract 

Matter 

(Pounds). 

Crude 

Fat 

(Pounds). 

Total 
Nutri- 
ents 
(Pounds). 

Relative 
Diges- 
tion 

Values; 

Alfalfa 
=^100. 

Relative' 

Net 

Energy 

Values; 

Alfalfa 

=  100. 

Alfalfa.       . 

199 

229 

505 

17 

950 

100 

100 

Red  clover. 

149 

272 

503 

35 

959 

101 

113 

Timothy  hay, 

60 

330 

550 

30 

970 

102 

126 

Rowen, 

158 

318 

524 

28 

1,028 

108 

120 « 

Gluten  feed,* 

446 

110 

948 

52 

1,556 

164 

260 

I  T.in 

dsey's  calc 

ulations. 

«  For 

compariso 

a. 

FEEDING  VALUE  OF  ALFALFA.         Ill 

One  notes  that  of  the  several  coarse  fodders,  alfalfa  furnishes  by  far 
the  most  digestible  protein.  Thus,  timothy  hay  yields  only  60  pounds, 
clover  and  rowen  149  and  158  pounds,  and  alfalfa  substantially  200 
pounds  in  a  ton.  Alfalfa  furnishes  the  largest  amount  of  protein  of  any 
of  the  more  common  and  useful  coarse  fodders.  In  case,  however,  of  the 
total  digestible  nutrients,  one  notes  but  little  difference  between  the 
timothy,  clover  and  alfalfa.  Rowen  yields  8  per  cent,  more,  while  such 
a  concentrate  as  gluten  feed  contains  64  per  cent,  more,  than  alfalfa. 
Total  digestible  matter,  however,  is  not  the  most  satisfactory  unit  of 
measure  of  the  energy  value  of  feedstuffs. 

The  unit  known  as  net  energy,  obtained  by  deducting  from  the  total 
energy  in  the  feed  the  energy  losses  in  feces,  urine  and  heat  radiated,  is 
the  best  known  method  of  comparison.  On  this  basis  Armsby's  method 
of  calculation,  as  indicated  in  the  last  column  of  the  table,  shows  red  clover 
to  have  13  per  cent,  more  net  energy  value  than  alfalfa,  timothy  hay  26 
per  cent.,  rowen  20  per  cent.,  and  gluten  feed  160  per  cent.  While  experi- 
ments conducted  with  the  aid  of  the  respiration  calorimeter  demonstrate 
these  differences,  it  may  be  difficult  to  show  such  noticeable  variations 
with  the  aid  of  ordinary  feeding  experiments. 


FEEDING  EXPERIMENTS  WITH  ALFALFA. 

Experiments  I,  II  and  III. 

Alfalfa,  Beet  Pulp  and  Corn  Meal  v.  Hay,  Beet  Pulp  and  Corn  Gluten 
Products  for  Milk  Production. 

The  three  experiments  immediately  following  were  made  by  the  re- 
versal method  with  two  groups  of  six  and  one  group  of  eight  cows. 

The  objects  of  the  several  experiments  were:  — 

1.  To  compare  the  effect  of  the  dry  matter  and  the  protein  in  the  two 
rations  on  the  yield  of  mUk  and  milk  ingredients,  and  on  the  gain  or  loss 
in  weight. 

2.  To  see  if  the  protein  derived  largely  from  alfalfa  was  as  satisfactory 
for  milk  production  as  that  secured  largely  from  corn  by-products. 

3.  To  note  if  the  diuretic  effect  of  the  alfalfa  caused  any  noticeable 
milk  shrinkage.^ 

4.  To  observe  the  possible  adverse  effect  on  milk  production  of  the 
increased  metabolism,  caused  by  the  alfalfa. 

The  rations  were  designated  as  the  alfalfa  and  hay  rations.  The  former 
consisted  of  alfalfa  as  the  total  roughage,  plus  beet  pulp  and  corn  meal; 
the  latter,  of  hay  as  the  roughage,  plus  beet  pulp,  gluten  feed  and  gluten 
meal.  The  affalfa  ration  naturally  derived  its  protein  largely  from  al- 
falfa, while  in  the  hay  ration  a  large  part  of  the  protein  came  from  the 
gluten  products.  The  digestible  nutrients  in  each  ration  should  be  about 
the  same. 

^  Research  Bulletin  No.  33,  Wisconsin  Experiment  Station, 


112       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    186. 


Table  VI.  —  History  of  Cows. 

Experiment  I. 


Cows. 

Breed. 

Age 
(Years). 

Last  Calf 
dropped. 

Served. 

Milk 
Yield, 
Begin- 
ning of 
Trial 
(Pounds). 

Samantha  II,    . 
Cecile  II,  . 
Betty  III, 
Fancy  III, 
Betty  II.  . 
IdaSII,       . 

Grade  Holstein, 
Pure  Jersey,    . 
Grade  Ayrshire, 
Grade  Jersey, 
Grade  Ayrshire, 
Pure  Jersey,    . 

7 
3 
3 
8 
10 
3 

Oct.   31.1915 
Nov.  11,  1915 
Sept.  14,  1915 
Feb.  24,  1916 
Aug.  31,  1915 
Jan.   29,  1916 

Dec.  27,  1915 
Jan.    13,  1916 

Apr.     3,  1916 
Jan.    18,  1916 
Mar.  16,  1916 

40 
17 
22 
29 
21 
25 

Experiment  II. 


Colantha, 

Grade  Holstein, 

3 

June  19, 1916 

Sept.  15,  1916 

23 

Mary, 

Grade  Holstein, 

6 

Sept.    1, 1916 

- 

31 

Samantha  II,    . 

Grade  Holstein, 

7 

Aug.  14,  1916 

Dec.  27,  1916 

32 

Samantha  III, 

Grade  Holstein, 

3 

Aug.  6,  1916 

Oct.   30,  1916 

23 

Red  III,    . 

Grade  Jersey, 

11 

Aug.  18.  1916 

Nov.  12,  1916 

31 

White, 

Grade  Holstein, 

7 

Aug.  27, 1916 

Nov.  17,  1916 

41 

Experiment  III. 


Cecile  II,  . 
Betty  II,  . 
Samantha  II, 
Colantha, 
Red  IV,    . 
Ida  II,       . 
White, 
Samantha  III, 


Grade  Jersey, 
Grade  Ayrshire, 
Grade  Holstein, 
Grade  Holstein, 
Grade  Jersey, 
Pure  Jersey,     . 
Grade  Holstein, 
Grade  Holstein, 


Oct. 

14, 

1916 

Oct. 

25, 

1916 

Aug. 

14, 

1916 

June  19, 

1916 

Sept 

26. 

1916 

Dec. 

27, 

1916 

Aug. 

27, 

1916 

Aug. 

6, 

1916 

Jan. 

16, 

1917 

Apr. 

16, 

1917 

Nov 

7, 

1916 

Oct. 

20, 

1916 

Feb. 

28, 

1917 

Feb. 

15, 

1917 

Oct. 

27, 

1916 

18 
29 
25 
20 
21 
26 
27 
19 


FEEDING  VALUE  OF  ALFALFA. 


113 


Table  VII.  —  Duration  of  Experiments. 
Experiment  I. 


Dates. 

Hay-ration  Cows. 

Alfalfa-ration  Cows. 

Length 

of 
Period 
(Weeks). 

Apr.  10  through  May  14, 1916, 
May  26  through  June  29;  1916, 

Samantha  II,   Cecile   II, 

Betty  III. 
Fanny    III,    Betty    II, 

Ida  II. 

Fancy    III,    Betty    II, 

Ida  II. 
Samantha  II,    Cecile   II, 

Betty  III. 

5 
5 

Experiment  II. 

Oct.  20  through  Nov.  23, 1916, 

Dec.  4,  1916,  through  Jan.  7, 
1917. 

Colantha,  Mary,  Saman- 
tha II. 

Samantha  III,   Red  III, 
White. 

Samantha  III,   Red  III, 
White. 

Colantha,  Mary,  Saman- 
tha II. 

5 
5 

Experiment  III. 

Jan.  29  through  Mar.  4,  1917, 
Mar.  15  through  Apr.  18, 1917, 

Cecile  II,  Betty  II,   Sa- 
mantha II,  Colantha. 

Red   IV,   Ida   II,   White, 
Samantha  III. 

Red  IV.  Ida  II,  White, 
Samantha  III. 

Cecile  II,   Betty  II,  Sa- 
mantha II,  Colantha. 

5 
5 

Care  of  Animals.  —  The  animals  were  well  cared  for  in  all  cases,  and 
turned  into  a  barnyard  from  four  to  nine  hours  daily,  depending  upon  the 
weather  conditions.  They  were  fed  twice  daily;  the  hay  was  given  some 
time  before  milking,  and  the  grain  just  before  milking  in  the  afternoon, 
while  in  the  morning  the  grain  was  given  just  before  and  the  hay  just 
after  milking.  Water  was  supplied  constantly  by  the  aid  of  a  self-watering 
device.  During  the  winter' the  barn  wings  were  kept  at  a  temperature  of 
about  50°  F.  with  the  aid  of  steam  heat. 

Character  of  Feeds.  —  The  hay  was  of  mixed  grasses  with  some  clover, 
cut  upon  the  station  farm.  An  effort  was  made  to  have  it  of  as  uniform 
quality  as  possible  in  each  experiment.  The  alfalfa  in  the  first  experiment 
was  said  to  be  second  cutting,  grown  in  Michigan.  It  was  bright,  leafy 
and  sweet,  but  rather  coarse.  In  the  second  experiment  about  one-third 
of  the  alfalfa  was  from  the  same  source,  and  two-thirds  were  second  and 
third  cutting  grown  upon  the  station  farm.  In  the  third  experiment  it  was 
third  cutting  grown  upon  the  college  farm. 

The  beet  pulp  in  the  first  and  second  experiments  was  molasses  beet 
pulp,  and  in  the  third  experiment,  plain  dried  pulp,  —  all  of  good  quality. 

The  gluten  feed  and  Diamond  gluten  meal  were  of  the  usual  satisfactory 
quality.  The  same  may  be  said  of  the  corn  meal,  except  that  it  was  rather 
moist,  and  it  was  necessary  to  purchase  it  in  small  amounts  to  prevent 
heating. 


114       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    186. 

Sampling  Feeds  and  Milk.  —  The  hays  were  sampled  at  the  beginning, 
middle  and  end  of  each  half  of  the  trial  by  taking  forkfuls  of  the  daily 
weighings,  running  same  through  a  power  cutter,  sub-sampling  and  placing 
the  laboratory  samples  in  large  glass-stoppered  bottles;  these  bottles  prop- 
erly labeled  were  brought  to  the  laboratory  immediately.  The  grains 
were  sampled  daily  by  placing  definite  amounts  in  glass-stoppered  bot- 
tles, properly  labeled,  and  brought  to  the  laboratory  at  the  end  of  each 
half  of  the  trial.  Dry  matter  determinations  were  made  and  samples  pre- 
pared for  complete  analysis.  The  milk  was  sampled  for  five  consecutive 
days  in  each  week,  preserved  with  formalin,  and  the  composite  analyzed 
for  total  solids  and  for  fat  by  the  Babcock  method,  and  for  nitrogen.  The 
method  of  sampling  consisted  in  mixing  the  milk  as  soon  as  drawn  with 
the  aid  of  a  perforated  tin  disk  attached  to  the  end  of  a  stout  tin  handle, 
by  moving  the  same  up  and  down  gently  for  a  number  of  times,  and  then 
taking  out  a  definite  amount  with  a  small  long-handled  tin  dipper. 


Table  VIII.  - 

-  Analyses 

of  Feeds  (P 

er  Cent.). 

Feed. 

Water. 

Dry  Matter. 

Ex; 

peri- 
ment. 

Ash. 

Crude 
Pro- 
tein. 

True 
Pro- 
tein. 

Fiber. 

Ex- 
tract 
Mat- 
ter. 

Fat. 

I 

Hay,     .        .        . 

11.62-13.15 

8.02 

9.13 

7.37 

35.07 

46.27 

2.61 

II 

Hay,     . 

11.22-11.67 

6.34 

8.10 

7.20 

35.19 

48.12 

2.25 

III 

Hay.     . 

10.25-11.04 

6.46 

8.42 

7.35 

34.06 

48.66 

2.40 

I 

Alfalfa. 

12.85-15.16 

7.24 

14.93 

11.40 

41.22 

35.14 

1.47 

II 

j  Alfalfa  (old). 

12.65-14.18 

7.22 

15.31 

11.12 

40.56 

36.52 

1.39 

[Alfalfa  (new), 

12.43-12.81 

7.92 

17.41 

14.04 

31.42 

41.42 

1.83 

III 

Alfalfa, 

11.21-11.79 

7.16 

14.89 

11.83 

35.75 

40.05 

2.15 

I 

Beet  pulp.    . 

11.40-11.98 

4.41 

10.40 

7.65 

17.72 

66.86 

.61 

II 

Beet  pulp,    . 

12.23-12.76 

4.09 

10.31 

- 

18.24 

66.73 

.63 

III 

Beet  pulp,    . 

10.21-13.53 

2.79 

11.02 

- 

21.22 

64.28 

.69 

I 

Gluten  feed, 

8.41-10.85 

5.11 

30.08 

21.39 

7.13 

54.95 

2.73 

II 

Gluten  feed. 

10.25-11.63 

4.82 

30.99 

- 

7.13 

54.64 

2.42 

III 

Gluten  feed. 

9.47-  9.72 

6.00 

31.54 

- 

8.03 

53.36 

2.07 

I 

Gluten  meal. 

8.61-  8.96 

.87 

48.78 

46.23 

1.46 

47.95 

.94 

II 

Gluten  meal, 

9.26-  9.88 

1.20 

49.38 

- 

1.63 

46.88 

.91 

III 

Gluten  meal, 

8.32-  8.67 

1.04 

50.50 

- 

1.76 

45.74 

.96 

I 

Corn  meal,  . 

14.53-16.40 

1.70 

10.34 

9.52 

1.72 

82.61 

3.63 

II 

Corn  meal,  . 

13.27-13.64 

1.51 

10.37 

- 

2.62 

81.42 

4.08 

III 

Corn  meal,  . 

11.53-11.65 

1.32 

10.49 

- 

2.51 

81.76 

3.93 

FEEDING  VALUE  OF  ALFALFA. 


115 


The  analytical  data  are  expressed  in  dry  matter  because  of  variations 
in  moisture.  From  an  analytical  standpoint  the  hays  resemble  each  other 
closely;  the  same  may  be  said  of  the  alfalfa,  except  that  the  sample  in 
the  third  experiment  contained  somewhat  less  fiber.  The  albuminoid 
matter  was  determined  by  the  Stutzer  method,  which  includes  both  the 
amino  acids  and  the  acid  amids.  In  view  of  the  fact  that  the  amino  acids 
are  supposed  to  be  valuable  in  protein  sjoithesis,  the  Stutzer  method  of 
separation  is  not  held  to  be  of  as  much  importance  as  formerly.  The  hay 
contained  14.5  per  cent,  and  the  alfalfa  22.64  per  cent,  of  its  nitrogen 
in  the  non-albuminoid  form. 

The  beet  pulp  used  in  the  third  experiment  showed  rather  more  fiber 
and  a  little  less  extract  matter,  because  of  the  lack  of  the  molasses. 

The  several  lots  of  the  different  grains  were  quite  uniform  in  character. 
The  one  sample  of  gluten  feed  on  which  a  non-albuminoid  nitrogen  test 
was  made  showed  some  29  per  cent,  of  this  ingredient,  indicating  the  ad- 
dition of  considerable  "steep  water"  in  its  manufacture. 

Table  IX.  —  Average  Daily  Ration  consumed  per  Cow  {Pounds). 
Experiment  I. 


Num- 
ber of 
Cows. 


Character 
OF  Ration. 


Alfalfa. 


Hay. 


Beet 
Pulp. 


Gluten 
Feed. 


Gluten 
Meal. 


Corn 
Meal. 


Alfalfa, 


Hay, 


16.47-24.50 
18.96 


16.00-24.00 
18.77 


4.00-5.00 
4.17 


4.00-5.00 
4.17 


3.31-7.75 
4.55 


.00-6.00 
1.83 


1.00-3  00 
2.33 


Experiment  II. 


Alfalfa, 
Hay, 


19.14-22.83 
20.65 


17.77-22.00 
19.96 


3.00-5.00 
3.67 


3.00-5.00 
3.67 


.75-3.8 
1.73 


0.00-4.00 
3.17 


4.00-6.00 
5.13 


Experiment  III. 


Alfalfa, 
Hay, 


16.00-22.00 
20.63 


15.69-22.00 
20.36 


3.00-4.00 
3.13 


3.00-4.00 
3.13 


.00-2/00 
.75 


2.67-4.50 
3.39 


3.09-5.16 
4.32 


The  reason  for  presenting  the  above  concise  tables  is  to  give  the  inter- 
ested student  an  idea  of  the  amounts  fed  daily  in  the  two  different  rations, 


116       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    186. 

and  to  emphasize  their  uniformity.  In  the  first  experiment  more  corn 
meal  was  fed  than  gluten  products,  because  of  its  larger  moisture 
content. 


Table  X.  —  Estimated  Dry  and  Digestible  Nutrients  in  Average  Daily 

Rations  (Pounds). 

Experiment  I. 


Dry 
Matter. 

Digestible  Nutrients. 

Character  op 
Ration. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Extract 
Matter. 

Fat. 

Total. 

Nutri- 
tive. 
Ratio. 

Alfalfa,      . 
Hay. 

23.82 
23.93 

2.23 
2.44 

3.37 
4.09 

9.28 
8.48 

.22 
.27 

15.10 
15.28 

1:5.9 
1  :5.4 

Experiment  II. 


Alfalfa, 
Hay, 


25.64 
25.31 


2.66 
2.67 


3.28 
4.29 


10.08 
9.09 


16.27 
16.30 


1  :5.2 
1  :5.2 


Experiment  III. 


Alfalfa, 
Hay, 


24.84 
24.72 


2.39 
2.61 


3.28 
4.23 


9.76 
8.65 


15.71 
15.74 


1  :5.7 
1  :5.1 


The  above  data  were  secured  by  applying  average  digestion  coefficients 
to  the  analyses  of  the  several  feeds,  and  multiplying  by  the  amounts 
of  dry  matter  consumed  daily.  It  is  at  best  but  an  estimate.  It  serves, 
however,  to  give  the  reader  an  idea  of  the  uniformity  of  the  two  rations, 
in  so  far  as  digestible  nutrients  and  nutritive  ratio  are  concerned. 


FEEDING  VALUE  OF  ALFALFA. 


117 


1 .  The  effect  of  the  total  dry  matter  contained  in  the  two  separate  rations, 
and  aUo  the  effect  of  the  dry  matter  in  the  hay  and  in  the  alfalfa  upon  the 
yield  of  milk  and  milk  ingredients. 

Table  XI.  —  Total  Dry  Matter  consumed  in  Each  Feed  and  in  the  Com- 
plete Ration  {Pounds). 
Experiment  I. 


rS 

Alfalfa. 

Hay. 

Beet 
Pulp.  » 

Gluten 
Feed. 

Gluten 
Meal. 

Corn 

Meal. 

Total. 

s 

a 
Is 

3 

6 

3 

6 

'3 

1 

i 

3 

(V 

r 

o 

i 

OJ<J 

p 

d 
o 

a 

•B 

6 

3,421 

16.29 

3,455 

16.45 

773 

3.68 

349 

1.67 

447 

2.13 

809 

3.85 

5,003 

5,024 

Experiment  II. 

6 

3,775    17.99 

3,711 

17.69 

675 

3.21 

325 

1.54 

602 

.87 

930 

4.44 

5,380 

5,313 

Experiment  III. 

8 

5,116 

18.26 

5.093 

18.20 

777 

2.76 

190 

.68 

866 

3.09 

1,071 

3.82 

6,964 

6,926 

Totals. 

12,312 

- 

12,259 

- 

2,225 

- 

864 

- 

1,915 

- 

2,810 

- 

17.347 

17,263 

I  Beet  pulp  was  fed  in  each  half  of  each  trial  in  substantially  like  amounts. 


A  study  of  Table  XI  indicates  that  the  total  dry  matter  consumed  in 
each  ration  was  substantially  the  same,  the  most  noticeable  variation 
being  in  Experiment  II.  The  total  dry  matter  consumed  in  the  three 
experiments  was  nearly  the  same,  differing  by  only  about  one-half  per 
cent. 

The  dry  matter  consumed  in  the  form  of  alfalfa  and  in  hay  in  the  three 
experiments  (12,312  pounds  and  12,259  pounds)  likewise  shows  a  varia- 
tion of  substantially  only  one-half  per  cent. 


118       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    186. 


Table  XII.  —  Total  Milk  and  Milk  Ingredients  produced. 
Experiment  I. 


Num- 
ber 
of 

Cows. 

Character'^of 
Ration.^ 

Milk 
pro- 
duced 
(Pounds). 

Solids 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Solids 
(Pounds). 

Fat 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Fat 
(Pounds). 

Nitro- 
gen 
(Per 

Cent.). 

Nitro- 

sen 

(Pounds). 

6 
6 

Alfalfa,  . 
Hay.      . 

4,916 
4,870 

12.78 
13.47 

628.1 
655.9 

4.21 
4.73 

206.6 
230.5 

.51 
.54 

25.10 
26.38 

Experiment  II. 

6 
6 

Alfalfa,  . 
Hay,      . 

4,856 
4,776 

13.21 
13.20 

641.5 
630.5 

4.57 
4.53 

222.1 
216.3 

.54 
.54 

26.42 
25.61 

Experiment  III. 

8 
8 

Alfalfa,  . 
Hay,      . 

0,094 
6,087 

14.04          855.6 
14.18          862.9 

5.02 
5.10 

306.2 
310.4 

.59 
.60 

35.73 
36.46 

Totals. 

Alfalfa,  ,        .        .       15,866 
Hay,      .        .        .       15,733 

13.34 
13.62 

2,125.2 
2,149.3 

4.60 
4.79 

734.9 
757.2 

.55 
.56 

87.25 
88.45 

. —                                          ._,..,                                                     , 

Table  XII  shows  that  in  Experiment  I  the  milk  yield  favored  the  al- 
falfa ration  by  about  1  per  cent.,  while  in  the  second  experiment  the  dif- 
ference was  about  2  per  cent.  In  the  third  experiment  the  difference  was 
very  slight,  —  only  7  pounds.  The  total  of  the  three  experiments  gives  a 
yield  of  15,866  pounds  for  the  alfalfa  ration,  and  15,733  pounds  for  the 
hay  ration,  a  difference  of  about  nine-tenths  of  1  per  cent,  in  favor  of 
the  alfalfa. 

In  Experiment  I,  for  some  reason,  the  yields  of  total  solids  and  total 
fat  were  noticeably  greater  (4.4  and  11.1  per  cent.)  on  the  hay  ration. 
These  results,  however,  were  not  made  emphatic  by  the  two  other  experi- 
ments; hence  one  is  in  no  way  justified  in  assuming  that  the  alfalfa  in- 
fluenced the  milk  composition,  A  definite  amount  of  dry  matter,  there- 
fore, in  each  of  the  rations  produced  substantially  the  same  results  in  the 
yield  of  milk  and  milk  ingredients.  One  sees  that  the  alfalfa  stimulated 
slightly  the  yield  of  milk  without  correspondingly  increasing  the  solids. 


FEEDING  VALUE  OF  ALFALFA. 


119 


Table  XIII.  —  Gain  or  Loss  in  Live  Weight  (Pounds). 


Gain. 

Loss. 

Net. 

Experiment. 

Alfalfa 
Ration. 

Hay 
Ration. 

Alfalfa 
Ration. 

Hay 
Ration. 

Alfalfa 
Ration. 

Hay 
Ration. 

I 

II 

Ill, 

105 
63 
26 

292 
60 
136 

73 

108 

7 

+105 
—10 
—82 

+292 
+53 
+136 

Totals, 

- 

- 

- 

+13 

+481 

i: i^_ 

^ 

In  Experiment  I,  when  several  of  the  animals  were  somewhat  advanced 
in  the  milking  period,  each  herd  showed  an  increase  in  live  weight.  In 
Experiment  II  the  cows  were  comparatively  fresh  and  not  as  much  gain 
was  noted;  in  this  experiment  the  alfalfa  ration  produced  a  slight  de- 
crease in  the  weight  of  the  herd.  In  Experiment  III,  conducted  during 
the  winter  and  early  spring,  a  decrease  was  also  noted  when  the  alfalfa 
ration  was  fed.  It  may  be  remarked  that  in  each  experiment  it  was  our 
object  to  feed  slightly  less  nutrients  than  calculations  showed  to  be  neces- 
sary to  maintain  weight  and  to  meet  the  demands  for  milk,  so  that  the 
full  effect  of  each  ration  would  be  felt.  It  seems  evident  that  while  the 
alfalfa  and  corn  meal  ration  fully  maintained  the  milk  yield,  it  was 
not  as  effective  in  increasing  the  live  weight  as  was  the  hay  and  gluten 
ration. 

S.  The  effect  of  different  forms  of  protein  on  the  yield  and  character  of  the 
milk. 


Table  XIV.  —  Protein  consumed  in  the  Feeds  and  Rations  (Pounds). 


Alfalfa. 

Hay. 

Beet 
Pulp.i 

Gluten 
Products. 

Corn 
Meal. 

TOTAiS. 

Experiment. 

Alfalfa 
Ration. 

Hay 
Ration. 

I 

II,       ...        . 
Ill 

510.8 
631.2 
761.8 

315.4 
306.0 
428.8 

80.4 
69.6 
85.6 

323.0 
398.0 
497.2 

83.7 
06.4 
112.3 

674.9 
797.2 
959.7 

718.8 

773.6 

1,011.6 

Totals, 

_.    ..... 

1,903.8 

1,050.2 

235.6 

1,218.2 

292.4 

2,431.8 

2,504.0 

3 

1  Beet  pulp  was  fed  in  each  half  of  each  experiment  in  substantially  like  amounts. 


120       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION    BULLETIN    186. 


Table  XV.  —  Protein  Found  in  the  Milk  (Pounds). 


Experiment. 

I 

II 

Ill 

Totals 


558.8 


In  case  of  the  alfalfa  ration,  the  total  amount  of  protein  consumed 
in  the  three  experiments  was  2,431.8  pounds,  of  which  1,903.8  pounds,  or 
78.2  per  cent.,  came  from  the  alfalfa,  and  528  pounds,  or  21.7  per  cent., 
came  from  the  beet  pulp  and  corn  meal.  In  the  hay  ration,  of  the  total 
of  2,504  pounds  consumed,  1,050.2  pounds,  or  41.9  per  cent.,  came  from 
the  hay,  and  1,453.6  pounds,  or  58.1  per  cent.,  came  from  the  beet  pulp 
and  corn  gluten  products. 

The  total  protein  in  the  milk  (N  X  6.25)  produced  by  the  alfalfa  ration 
was  545.3  pounds,  and  by  the  hay  ration  558.8  pounds,  showing  that  the 
alfalfa  ration,  in  which  78.2  per  cent,  of  the  protein  was  derived  from 
alfalfa,  produced  as  much  milk  protein  and  substantially  as  much  milk 
solids  as  did  the  hay  ration;  or,  in  other  words,  that  the  protein  of  the 
alfalfa  was  fully  as  satisfactory  a  source  of  protein  for  milk  formation  as 
was  that  in  the  hay  and  corn  gluten.  An  objection  might  be  raised  to 
this  conclusion  because  528  pounds  of  protein  (21.7  per  cent,  of  the  total 
amount  fed)  was  derived  from  beet  pulp  and  corn  meal,  and  this  amount 
of  protein  was  nearly  equal  to  the  amount  produced  in  the  milk.  It  must 
be  remembered,  however,  that  of  the  528  pounds,  scarcely  two-thirds 
would  be  digestible  and  hence  available  for  milk  production.  Although 
it  is  quite  possible  that  the  protein  from  the  beet  pulp  and  corn  meal  was 
also  utilized  for  the  formation  of  the  nitrogenous  matter  in  the  milk,  it  is 
fairly  safe  to  conclude  that  the  alfalfa  protein  proved  fully  as  satisfactory 
a  source  for  milk  formation  as  did  that  contained  in  the  hay  and  corn 
gluten  products.  Hart  and  Humphrey^  have  more  completely  demon- 
strated this  by  feeding  to  two  cows  a  ration  composed  of  alfalfa  and 
starch,  and  they  found  that  the  protein  in  the  alfalfa  was  equal  to  that 
contained  in  a  ration  composed  entirely  of  corn  products. 


3.  The  diuretic  effect  of  the  alfalfa. 

The  same  authors  have  shown  in  two  experiments  with  two  cows  that 
the  substitution  of  alfalfa  in  place  of  corn  products  caused  a  marked  in- 
crease in  the  excretion  of  urine  and  a  shrinkage  in  the  milk  yield,  in  some 
cases  amounting  to  substantially  25  per  cent. 

>  Loc.  cit. 


FEEDING  VALUE  OF  ALFALFA. 


121 


Because  of  the  number  of  cows  involved,  it  was  not  practicable  to. 
determine  the  urine  output  nor  the  water  drunk.  On  the  basis,  however, 
of  the  voliune  of  milk  as  well  as  the  total  solids  yielded,  as  stated  in  Table 
XII,  it  did  not  appear  in  the  five  weeks'  period  that  the  alfalfa  exerted 
any  adverse  effect.  A  study  of  the  daily  records  of  individual  cows,  espe- 
cially during  the  transition  period  from  the  hay  to  the  alfalfa  ration,  con- 
firms this  conclusion.  In  fact,  the  alfalfa  seemed  to  act  as  a  slight  stimulus 
to  production.  Whether  this  was  due  to  the  favorable  character  of  the 
proteins  or  to  other  causes  is  not  clear. 

4.  The  influence  of  the  increased  metabolism  caused  by  the  alfalfa  on  the 
yield  of  milk  and  on  live  weight. 

Armsby^  has  shown  that  by  increasing  the  metabolism  alfalfa  is  de- 
cidedly inferior  as  a  source  of  energy  to  timothy  hay,  in  the  proportion  of 
34.1  to  48.63  therms  of  net  energy  per  100  pounds  of  dry  mattter;  i.e.,  a 
decrease  of  some  30  per  cent.^  Inasmuch  as  the  dry  matter  in  alfalfa  and 
in  hay  comprised  some  71  per  cent,  of  the  total  dry  matter  contained  in 
each  of  the  two  rations,  it  would  seem  as  though  the  influence  of  the 
increased  metabolism  caused  by  the  alfalfa  would  be  noticeable,  even 
though  the  hay  was  not  what  might  be  classed  as  timothy.  The  yields 
of  mUk  and  milk  solids  fail  to  show  any  unfavorable  effect  of  this  factor. 
Only  in  the  case  of  the  live  weight  (Table  XIII)  produced  does  one  notice 
a  possible  adverse  effect  of  the  alfalfa,  which  might  be  attributed  to  its 
inferior  energy  value. 

Additional  Experimental  Data. 

Table  XVI.  —  Total  Rations  Consumed  by  Each  Cow  (Pounds). 

Experiment  I. 


Cows. 


Alfalfa. 


Hay. 


Beet 
Pulp.s 


Corn 
Meal. 


Gluten 
Feed. 


Gluten 
Meal. 


Fancy  III,  . 
Betty  II,  . 
Ida  II, 

Samantha  II, 
Cecile  II,     . 
Betty  III,    . 


735.0 
609.5 
611.0 
857.5 
576.5 
589.5 


714.5 
604.5 
602.5 
840.0 
560.0 
620.5 


140 
140 
140 
175 
140 
140 


151.0 
151.0 
151.0 
271.0 
116.0 
116.0 


35.00 
52.50 
52.50 
210.00 
35.00 


105.0 

87.5 
87.5 
35.0 
70.0 
■105.0 


1  The  Nutrition  of  Farm  Animals,  pp.  660,  663. 

2  Most  other  hays  (mixtures  of  grasses)  are  also  shown  to  be  quite  superior  to  alfalfa  as  a  source 
of  energy. 

'  The  same  amount  fed  in  each  half. 


122       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    186. 


Table  XVI.  —  Total  Rations  Consumed  by  Each  Cow 
Experiment  II. 


Concluded. 


Cows. 

Alfalfa. 

Hay. 

Beet 
Pulp. 

Corn 
Meal. 

Gluten 
Feed. 

Gluten 

Meal. 

Samantha  III,     .... 

735.0 

700.0 

105 

175.0 

26.25 

140.0 

Red  III 

700.0 

665.0 

140 

140.0 

135.64 

- 

White, 

799.0 

770.0 

140 

210.0 

96.25 

105.0 

Colantha, 

697.0 

700.0 

105 

183.8 

35.00 

140.0 

Mary, 

670.0 

622.0 

105 

183.8 

35.00 

140.0 

Samantha  II,       ...        . 

735.0 

735.0 

175 

183.8 

35.00 

140.0 

Experiment  III. 


Red  IV, 

700.0 

688.0 

105 

144.5 

35.00 

93.5 

Ida  II, 

700.0 

700.0 

105 

144.5 

35.00 

105.0 

White, 

770.0 

770.0 

105 

162.1 

- 

157.5 

Samantha  III, 

770.0 

770.0 

105 

144,5 

- 

137.0 

Cecile  II,     . 

560.0 

549.0 

140 

108.2 

- 

105.0 

Betty  II,      . 

770.0 

727.0 

105 

180.6 

70.00 

105.0 

Samantha  II, 

735.0 

731.0 

105 

180.6 

70.00 

105.0 

Colantha,    . 

770.0 

765.0 

105 

144.5 

- 

140.0 

Table  XVII.  —  Changes  in  Live  Weight  (Pounds). 
Experiment  I. 


Cows. 

Fancy  III, 

Betty  II 

Ida  II, 

Samantha  II,       . 

Cecile  II, 

Betty  III 

Totals, 


FEEDING  VALUE  OF  ALFALFA. 


123 


Table  XVII.  —  Changes  in  Live  Weight  (Pounds) 
Experiment  II. 


Cows. 

Samantha  III,     .         . 

Red  III 

White 

Colantha 

Mary, 

Samantha  II 

Totals 


Concluded. 


Experiment  III. 


Red  IV,       . 
Ida  II, 
White, 

Samantha  III, 
Cecils  II,     . 
Betty  II,      . 
Samantha  II, 
Colantha,    . 
Totals,  . 


Table  XVIII.  —  Yield  of  Milk  and  Milk  Ingredients. 
Experiment  I. 
Alfalfa  Ration. 


Cows. 

Milk 
(Pounds). 

Solids 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Solids 
(Pounds). 

Fat 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Fat 
(Pounds). 

Nitro- 
gen 
(Per 

Cent.). 

Nitro- 
gen 
(Pounds). 

Fancy  III, 
Betty  II,     . 
Ida  II, 
Samantha  II, 
Cecile  II,    . 
Betty  III,  . 

1,044.4 
687.2 
791.0 

1,186.0 
549.7 
656.2 

11.97 
12.96 
13.45 
12.33 
14.42 
12.52 

125.01 
89.06 
106.39 
146.23 
79.27 
82.16 

3.82 
4.32 
4.68 
3.85 
5.06 
4.04 

39.89 
29.69 
37.02 
45.66 
27.81 
26.51 

.46 
.53 
.51 
.50 
.61 
.51 

4.80 
3.64 
4.03 
5.93 
3.35 
3.35 

Totals, 

4,914.5 

- 

628.12 

- 

206.58 

- 

25.10 

124       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    186. 


Table  XVIII.  —  Yield  of  Milk  and  Milk  Ingredients  —  Continued. 

Experiment  I.  —  Concluded. 

Hay  Ration. 


Cows. 

Milk 
(Pounds). 

Solids 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Solids 
(Pounds). 

Fat 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Fat 
(Pounds). 

Nitro- 
gen 
(Per 

Cent.). 

Nitro- 
gen 
(Pounds). 

Fancy  III, 

Betty  II,    . 

Ida  II,         ... 

Samantha  II, 

Cecilell,    . 

Betty  III,  . 

992.7 
631.3 
670.5 
1,280.3 
581.0 
714.2 

12.77 
13.82 
14.38 
12.79 
14.95 
13.28 

126.77 
87.25 
96.42 

163.75 
86.86 
94.85 

4.36 
4.95 
5.26 
4.36 
5.56 
4.56 

43.28 
31.25 
35.27 
55.82 
32.30 
32.57 

.50 
.56 
.58 
.51 
.62 
.54 

4.96 
3.54 
3.89 
6.53 
3.60 
3.86 

Totals, 

4,870.0 

- 

655.90 

- 

230.49 

- 

26.38 

Experiment  II. 
Alfalfa  Ration. 


Samantha  III,    . 

630.1 

14.00 

88.21 

4.75 

29.92 

.59 

3.72 

Red  III,     . 

847.2 

13.12 

111.15 

4.82 

40.84 

.52 

4.41 

White, 

953.1 

12.54 

119.52 

4.48 

42.70 

.52 

4.96 

Colantha,    . 

689.8 

13.10 

90.36 

4.19 

28.90 

.55 

3.79 

Mary, 

874.8 

12.71 

111.19 

4.10 

35.86 

.50 

4.35 

Samantha  II,      . 

861.0 

14.06 

121.06 

5.10 

43.91 

.60 

5.17 

Totals, 

4,856.0 

- 

641.49 

- 

222.14 

- 

26.42 

Hay  Ration. 


Samantha  III,    . 

621.7 

14.09 

87.60 

4.72 

29.34 

.60 

3.73 

Red  III,      . 

631.5 

13.51 

85.32 

5.00 

31.58 

.55 

3.47 

White, 

954.7 

12.75 

121.72 

4.45 

42.48 

.53 

5.06 

Colantha,    . 

709.1 

13.03 

92.40 

4.25 

30.14 

.54 

3.83 

Mary, 

955.2 

12.58 

120.18 

4.21 

40.21 

.46 

4.39 

Samantha  II, 

903.9 

13.64 

123.29 

4.71 

42.57 

.59 

5.33 

Totals, 

4,776.1 

- 

630.49 

- 

216.32 

25.61 

FEEDING  VALUE  OF  ALFALFA. 


125 


Table  XVIII.  —  Yield  of  Milk  and  Milk  Ingredients 
Experiment  III. 
Alfalfa  Ration. 


Concluded. 


Cows. 

Milk  . 
(Pounds). 

Solids 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Solids 
(Pounds). 

Fat 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Fat 
(Pounds) . 

Nitro- 
gen 
(Per 

Cent.). 

Nitro- 

gen- 

(Pounds). 

Red  IV.      . 
Ida  II, 
White, 

Samantha  III, 
Cecilell,    . 
Betty  II,     . 
Samantha  II, 
Colantha,    . 

775.0 
877.0 
865.4 
648.1 
597.6 
950.3 
711.2 
669.3 

14.54 
14.41 
13.13 
13.94 
15.50 
13.87 
13.76 
13.48 

112.69 
129.38 
113.63 
90.35 
92.63 
131.81 
97.86 
90.22 

5.44 
5.40 
4.73 
4.72 
6.03 
4.89 
4.65 
4.42 

42.16 
47.36 
40.93 
30.59 
36.04 
46.47 
33.07 
29.58 

.60 
.57 
.54 
.61 
.64 
.57 
.61 
.58 

4.65 
5.00 
4.67 
3.95 
3.82 
5.42 
4.34 
3.88 

Totals, 

6,093.9 

- 

855.57 

- 

306.20 

- 

35.73 

Hay  Ration. 


Red  IV,      . 

738.2 

14.72 

108.66 

5.43 

40.08 

.62 

4.58 

Ida  II, 

756.2 

15.05 

113.81 

5.75 

43.48 

.61 

4.61 

White, 

883.9 

13.45 

118.88 

4.83 

42.69 

.58 

5.13 

Samantha  III, 

662.8 

14.31 

94.85 

4.88 

32.35 

.61 

4.04 

Cecilell,    . 

583.1 

15.15 

88.34 

5.72 

33.35 

.63 

3.67 

Betty  II,     . 

899.2 

14.25 

128.13 

5.22 

46.94 

.59 

5.31 

Samantha  II, 

893.8 

13.55 

121.11 

4.74 

42.40 

.59 

5.30 

Colantha,   . 

670.0 

13.30 

89.11 

4.34 

20.08 

.57 

3.82 

Totals, 

6,087.2 

- 

862.89 

- 

310.37 

- 

36.46 

Experiments  IV  and  V. 
Alfalfa  V.  Rowen  for  Milk  Production. 
The  claims  made  for  alfalfa  as  a  coarse  fodder  par  excellence  for  milk 
production  led  us  to  compare  the  same  with  the  second  cutting  of  grass 
known  as  rowen. 

Two  experiments  were  conducted  with  four  cows  each  by  the  reversal 
method.  The  methods  followed  in  the  experiments,  such  as  care  of  cows, 
sampling  of  feeds  and  milk,  are  the  same  as  those  described  in  previous 
experiments  of  a  similar  nature. 


126       MASS.    EXPEEIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    186. 


O 


t5 
I 

I— I 

X! 


^  a 

4,73 
6.43 
5.25 
3.90 

Milk 

Yield, 

Beginning 

of  Trial 

(Pounds). 

OO        rt        ,-(        lO 
CO        (M        (M        <M 

to  ca 

■S  3 

6i 

o      o      >o      >o 
o      ira      CO      >o 

03          1>-          03          C5 

> 

Oct.    27,  1916 

Si 

Jan.    10,  1917 
Sept.  19,  1916 
Aug.   IS,  1916 
Sept.    1,  1916 

00        tX        — 1        to 

Grade  Jersey 

Grade  Jersey, 

Grade  Holstein, 

to 

}f 
o 
O 

Fancy  III, 

Red  III 

cs       ir3       Ci 


OO         rt         rt 


t^      r^      t-      r^ 


O      O      M      P 


ph   a   o   o 


•-I  M  >        . 

iS  >>  "  s 

■§  I  I  ^ 

o  w  Pi  2    U 


FEEDING  VALUE  OF  ALFALFA. 


127 


Table  XX.  —  Duration  of  Experiments. 
Experiment  IV. 


Dates. 

Rowen-ration  Cows. 

Alfalfa-ration  Cows. 

Length 

of 
Period 
(Weeks). 

Feb.  26  through  April  1,  1917,     . 
April  12  through  May  16,  1917,    . 

Mary,  Red  III,.     . 
Fancy  III,  Peggy, 

Fancy  III,  Peggy, 
Mary.  Red  III,      . 

5 
5 

Experiment  V. 


April  26  through  May  23,  1917, 
June  3  through  June  30,  1917, 


Red  IV,  Ida  II,     . 
Cecile  II,  Betty  II, 


Cecile  II,  Betty  II, 
Red  IV,  Ida  II,     . 


Character  of  Feeds.  —  The  rowen  represented  the  second  cutting  of 
grass.  It  was  well  cured  and  in  good  condition,  but  it  did  not  show  a 
digestibility  equal  to  the  average,  as  the  results  stated  below  will  show. 
The  alfalfa  was  of  good  quality;  it  was  grown  in  New  York  State,  and 
while  rather  coarse  was  said  to  be  third  cutting.  The  corn  meal  and  bran 
were  of  the  usual  good  quality. 


Table  XXI.  —  Coefficients  of  Digestibility  secured  for  Rowen  and  Alfalfa. 


Trials. 

Dry 

Matter. 

Ash. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Extract 
Matter. 

Fat. 

Rowen 

Average  {previous  trials). 

Alfalfa 

Average  (previous  trials,  third 
cutting). 

2 

12 
4 
6 

61 
65 
58 
5S 

34 

43 
44 

60 
70 
72 
70 

68 
66 
46 
40 

63 
65 
66 
70 

32 
47 
24 
42 

It  will  be  noted  that  the  digestibility  of  the  protein  in  the  rowen  was 
noticeably  below  the  average.  The  alfalfa  coefficients  agreed  well  with 
the  average  results  of  other  trials. 

The  protein  in  the  rowen  showed  a  digestibility  inferior  to  that  of  the 
protein  in  the  alfalfa,  while  the  fiber  in  the  alfalfa  was  noticeably  less 
digestible  than  the  fiber  in  the  rowen.  The  low  digestibility  of  the  fiber 
in  the  alfalfa  is  characteristic  of  the  plant. 


128       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    186. 


Table  XXII.  —  Analyses  of  Feeds  (Per  Cent.). 


Water. 

Dry  Matter. 

Ex; 
peri- 
ment. 

Feed. 

Ash. 

Crude 
Pro- 
tein. 

True 
Pro- 
tein. 

Fiber. 

Ex- 
tract 
Mat- 
ter. 

Fat. 

IV 

Rowen,         .... 

10.29-11.13 

8.87 

12.59 

10.05 

28.57 

45.93 

4.04 

V 

Rowen, 

9.08-10.96 

7.66 

11.99 

10.48 

26.33 

50.36 

3.66 

Average, 

- 

8.27 

12.29 

10.27 

27.45 

48.15 

3.85 

IV 

Alfalfa, 

11.84-12.17 

7.21 

15  58 

12.59 

33,13 

41.89 

2.19 

V 

Alfalfa, 

11.58-11.87 

7.05 

16.29 

13.16 

29.65 

44.68 

2.33 

Average, 

- 

7.13 

15.94 

12.88 

31.39 

43.29 

2.26 

IV 

Grain  mixture,  i 

12.23-12.65 

3.32 

12.60 

- 

5.10 

74.50 

4.48 

V 

Grain  mixture, ' 

13.07-13.18 

3.43 

13.02 

- 

5.24 

74.80 

3.51 

1  The  grain  mixture  consisted  of  30  per  cent,  bran  and  70  per  cent,  corn  meal. 

Applying  the  digestion  coefficients  secured  by  our  experiments  to  the 
analyses  of  rowen  and  alfalfa,  the  following  amounts  of  organic  nutrients 
are  found  to  be  digestible  in  2,000  pounds  of  dry  matter. 


Tablk   XXIII.  —  Digestible   Organic   Nutrients   in   2,000   Pounds    Dry 

Matter  (Pounds). 


Feed. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Extract 
Matter. 

Fat. 

1 

Totals. 

Rowen, 

Alfalfa 

I 

147.48 
229.54 

373.32 

288.72 

606.69 
571.43 

24.64 
10.85 

1,152.13 
1.100.61 

The  alfalfa  furnished  82.06  pounds  more  of  digestible  crude  protein 
than  did  the  rowen,  but  less  digestible  fiber  and  extract  matter,  and 
rather  less  total  digestible  organic  nutrients.  While  the  rowen  contains 
noticeably  less  digestible  protein,  the  above  computation  indicates  that 
it  should  prove  approximately  as  valuable  for  milk  production  as  alfalfa. 


FEEDING  VALUE  OF  ALFALFA. 


129 


Table  XXIV.  —  Total  Rations  consumed  by  Each  Cow  (Pounds). 
Experiment  IV. 


Rowen. 

Alfalfa. 

Grain  Mixture. 

C0W3. 

Rowen 
Ration. 

Alfalfa 
Ration. 

Mary 

626 

610 

210 

210 

Red  III 

663 

665 

195 

210 

Fancy  III 

768 

770 

350 

350 

Peggy 

630 

630 

210 

210 

Totals 

2,687 

2,675 

965 

980 

Experiment  V. 


Red  IV 

Ida  II 

Cecile  II 

Betty  II 

Totals 

Totals  (both  experiments), 


504 
504 
476 


2,072 
4,759 


504 
504 
476 
578 


2,062 
4,737 


168 
168 
196 
224 


756 
1,721 


168 
168 
196 
224 


756 
1,736 


The  totals  show  that  in  the  two  experiments  substantially  like  amounts 
of  rowen  or  alfalfa  and  grain  were  fed. 


Table  XXV.  —  Total  Dry  Matter  consumed  in  Each  Feed  (Pounds). 


Experiment. 

Rowen. 

Alfalfa. 

Grain  Mixture. 

Rowen 
Ration. 

Alfalfa 
Ration. 

IV 

2,401 
1,864 

2,354 

1,828 

845 
657 

857 

V 

657 

Totals, 

4,265 

4,182 

1,502 

1,514 

About  2  per  cent,  more  dry  matter  in  the  form  of  rowen  was  fed  than 
in  alfalfa,  while  the  dry  matter  in  the  form  of  grain  was  about  the  same. 
If  the  rowen  was  equal  to  the  alfalfa,  one  would  expect  fully  as  good 
results  in  milk  yield  and  live  weight. 


130       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    186. 


Table  XXVI.  —  Gain  or  Loss  in  Live  Weight  (Pounds). 


Gain. 

Loss. 

Net. 

Experiment. 

Rowen 
Ration. 

Alfalfa 
Ration. 

Rowen 
Ration. 

Alfalfa 
Ration. 

Rowen 
Ration. 

Alfalfa 
Ration. 

IV 

V,     .        .        .        . 

26 
5 

10 
59 

18 
37 

30 
0 

+8 
—32 

—20 
+36 

Totals, 

•- 

- 

- 

- 

-24 

+16 

There  appeared  to  be  a  slight  gain  on  the  alfalfa  and  a  slight  loss  on 
the  rowen  ration. 


Table  XXVII.  —  Yield  of  Milk  and  Milk  Ingredients. 

Experiment  IV. 

Rouxn  Ration. 


Cows. 

Milk 
(Pounds). 

Solids 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Solids 
(Pounds). 

Fat 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Fat 
(Pounds). 

Nitro- 
gen 
(Per 

Cent.). 

Nitro- 
gen 
(Pounds). 

Mary, 
Red  III,    . 
Fancy  III, 
Peggy, 

770.2 

596.1 

1,132.9 

609.0 

12.62 
14.26 
13.34 
15.51 

97.20 
85.00 
151.13 
94.46 

4.17 
5.52 
4.89 
6.23 

32.12 
32.90 
55.40 
38.25 

.52 
.61 
.49 
.62 

4.01 
3.64 
5.55 
3.78 

Totals, 

3,108.2 

13.761 

427.79 

5.10' 

158.67 

.551 

16.98 

Alfalfa  Ration. 


Mary, 

737.4 

12.51 

92.25 

3.94 

29.05 

.51 

3.76 

Red  III,    . 

608.3 

13.42 

81  63 

5.01 

30.48 

.59 

3.59 

Fancy  III, 

1,272.1 

13.03 

165.75 

4.47 

56.86 

.53 

6.74 

Peggy. 

650.7 

15.43 

100.40 

6.36 

41.38 

.63 

4.10 

Totals, 

3,268.5 

13.46' 

440.03 

4.821 

157.77 

.561 

18.19 

Experiment  V. 
Rowen  Ration. 


Red  IV,    . 

638.4 

15.13 

81.46 

5.91 

31.82 

.59 

3.18. 

Ida  II.      . 

555.6 

14.75 

81.95 

5.74 

31.89 

.57 

3.17 

Cecile  II,  . 

478.3 

15.14 

72.41 

5.69 

27.22 

.62 

2.97 

Betty  II,  . 

727.1 

13.39 

97.36 

4.42 

32.14 

.50 

3.64 

Totals, 

2,299.4 

14.491 

333.18 

5.351 

123.07 

.561 

12.96 

1  Average  percentages  obtained  by  dividing  total  pounds  of  solids,  etc.,  by  total  pounds  of 
milk. 


FEEDING  VALUE  OF  ALFALFA. 


131 


Table  XXVII.  —  Yield  of  Milk  and  Milk  Ingredients  —  Concluded. 

Alfalfa  Ration. 


Cows. 

Milk 
(Pounds). 

Solids 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Solids 
(Pounds). 

Fat 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Fat 
(Pounds). 

Nitro- 
gen 
(Per 

Cent.). 

Nitro- 
gen 
(Pounds). 

Red  IV,    . 
Ida  II,       . 
Cecile  II,  . 
Betty  II,  . 

554.4 
540.2 
490.7 
714.6 

14.26 
14.04 
15.26 
13.69 

79.06 

75.84 
74.88 
97.83 

5.03 
5.03 
5.93 
4.87 

27.89 
27.17 
29.10 
34.80 

.59 
.56 
.59 
.56 

3.27 
3.03 
2.89 
4.00 

Totals, 
Totals  rowen, 
Totals  alfalfa. 

2,299  9 
5,407.6 
5,568.4 

14.24' 

327.61 
760.97 
767.64 

5.17' 

118.96 

281.74 
278.73 

.57' 

13,19 
29.94 
31.38 

I                                                                                                                                                                    1 

1  Average  percentages  obtained  by  dividing  total  pounds  of  solids,  etc.,  by  total  pounds  of 
milk. 

In  Experiment  IV  the  alfalfa  ration  apparently  increased  the  yield  of 
milk  5.2  per  cent.,  while  in  Experiment  V  the  yield  was  the  same  on  each 
ration.  The  total  yield  for  both  experiments  was  5,407.6  pounds  on  the 
rowen,  and  5,568.4  pounds  on  the  alfalfa,  or  an  increase  of  3  per  cent,  in 
favor  of  the  alfalfa.  The  rowen  ration  produced  a  total  yield  of  760.97 
pounds  of  solids  as  against  767.64  pounds  for  the  alfalfa;  the  total  jdeld 
of  fat  was  28L74  pounds  on  the  rowen  ration,  and  278.73  pounds  on  the 
alfaKa;  the  yield  of  nitrogen  was  29.94  pounds  on  the  rowen  ration,  and 
31.38  pounds  on  the  alfalfa. 

The  following  table  shows  the  amount  of  milk  and  mUk  ingredients  pro- 
duced by  100  pounds  of  dry  matter  derived  from  each  of  the  two  rations:  — 


Table  XXVIII.  —  Milk  and  Milk  Ingredients  proditced  by  100  Pounds 
of  Dry  Matter  {Pounds). 


Ration. 

Milk. 

Solids. 

Fat. 

Rowen, 

Alfalfa 

93.77 
97.76 

13.19 

13.48 

4.89 
4.89 

In  case  of  the  volume  of  milk,  and  to  a  less  degree  in  case  of  the  total 
solids,  the  yields  were  rather  in  favor  of  the  alfalfa  ration.  The  fat  per- 
centage, on  the  other  hand,  did  not  keep  pace  with  the  increase  in  the 
milk  yield.  Note  (Table  XXVII)  that  in  Experiment  IV,  with  the  rowen 
ration,  the  percentage  was  5.1  as  against  4.82  for  the  alfalfa  ration;  and 
in  Experiment  V,  5.35  for  the  rowen  ration  as  against  5.17  for  the  alfalfa 
ration.    The  per  cent,  of  solids  not  fat  was  substantially  the  same  in  each 


132       MASS.    EXPERIMENT    STATION   BULLETIN    186. 


experiment,  namely,  8.66  against  8.64  in  the  fourth,  and  9.14  against  9.07 
in  the  fifth.  On  the  basis  of  dry  matter,  the  fat  yield  was  the  same  with 
each  ration. 

Experiment  VI. 

Alfalfa,  English  Hay  and  Grain  v.  English  Hay  and  Grain  for  Milk  Pro- 

dxiction. 

The  object  of  this  particular  experiment  with  milch  cows  was  to  compare 
the  feeding  value  of  a  ration  composed  of  equal  parts  of  alfalfa  and  Eng- 
Ush  hay,  corn-and-cob  meal  and  a  little  bran  (mostly  home-grown  products) 
with  that  of  one  consisting  of  EngUsh  hay,  bran,  corn-and-cob  meal  and 
gluten  feed,  in  order  to  see  whether  reasonably  satisfactory  results  could 
not  be  secured  from  the  use  of  alfalfa  as  a  considerable  source  of  protein, 
in  place  of  purchased  protein  in  the  form  of  bran  and  gluten  feed. 

Plan  of  the  Experiment.  —  Eight  cows  which  had  calved  during  the  late 
summer  and  autumn  were  divided  into  two  groups  of  four  each  and  fed 
by  the  reversal  method.  One  group  of  four  received  the  so-called  alfalfa 
ration  at  the  same  time  the  other  four  were  receiving  the  EngUsh  hay  and 
purchased  grain  ration.  In  the  second  half  of  the  trial  the  feeding  was 
reversed. 


Table  XXIX 

.  —  History  of  Cows. 

Cows. 

Breed. 

Age 

(Years). 

Last  Calf 
dropped. 

Served. 

Milk 
Yield, 
Begin- 
ning of 
Trial 
(Pounds). 

Samantha 
Fancy  II, 
Samantha 
Cecile, 
Red  III, 
Daisy  II, 
Ida,  . 
Betty  II, 

II, 

Grade  Holstein, 
Grade  Jersey, 
Grade  Holstein, 
Pure  Jersey,    . 
Grade  Jersey, 
Grade  Jersey, 
Pure  Jersey,    . 
Grade  Ayrshire, 

8 
4 
2 
6 
6 
2 
4 
4 

Sept.  23,  1911 
Oct.    28,  1911 
Nov.    1,  1911 
Nov.  21,  1911 
Sept.  23,  1911 
Nov.  17,  1911 
Nov.  16,  1911 
Nov.    9,  1911 

Nov.":  7,  1911 
Dec.  10,  1911 
Dec.  10,  1911 
Mar.   12,  1912 
Nov.    6,  1911 
Mar.  25,  1912 
Feb.  24,  1912 
Jan.     8,  1912 

28.1 
30.6 
28.9 
23.7 
20.2 
28.0 
31.1 

I : -   . . 

Table  XXX.  —  Duration  of  Experiment. 


D.4TES. 

Alfalfa-ration  Cows. 

English  Hay-ration  Cows. 

Length 

of 
Period 
(Weeks). 

Dec.  28,  1911,  through  Jan. 

24,  1912. 
Feb.  9  through  Mar.  7,  1912, 

'      '- 

Samantha,  Fancy  II,  Sa- 
mantha II,  Cecile. 

Red  III,  Daisy  II,  Ida, 
Betty  II. 

Red  III,  Daisy  II,  Ida. 
Betty  II. 

Samantha,  Fancy  II,  Sa- 
mantha II,  Cecile. 

4 
4 

FEEDING  VALUE  OF  ALFALFA. 


133 


An  interval  of  fifteen  days  was  allowed  between  the  two  periods  of  the 
experiment. 

Character  of  Feeds.  —  The  hay  was  fine  and  of  fair  quaUty,  coming  from 
a  meadow  that  had  been  in  grass  for  a  number  of  years.  The  alfalfa  was 
grown  upon  the  college  grounds,  and  was  of  excellent  quality.  The  corn- 
and-cob  meal  was  excellent,  and  the  bran  and  gluten  feed  of  average 
qualit3\ 

The  method  of  care  and  feeding,  weighing  of  the  animals  and  samphng 
of  the  feeds  and  milk  were  the  same  as  previously  described. 


Table  XXXI.  - 

Analyses  of  Feeds  (Per  Cent.). 

Feed. 

Water. 

Ash. 

Crude 
Pro- 
tein. 

True 
Pro- 
tein. 

Fiber. 

Ex- 
tract 
Matter. 

Fat. 

Totals. 

Alfalfa  (farm). 

11.20 

7.25 

15.66 

11.79 

28.62 

35.54 

1.73 

100 

Alfalfa  (experiment  station),  . 

10.14 

7.88 

16.85 

13.79 

24.86 

38.89 

1.38 

100 

English  hay 

9.49 

5.58 

8.63 

7.74 

28.45 

45.64 

2.21 

100 

Wheat  bran,    .... 

12.43 

6.02 

15.46 

- 

9.68 

52.04 

4.37 

100 

Corn-and-cob  meal. 

16.04 

1.28 

8.27 

- 

4.38 

66.92 

3.11 

100 

Gluten  feed,   .... 

9.97 

.82 

25.74 

- 

6.64 

53.37 

3.46 

100 

Table  XXXII.  — •  Total  Rations  consumed  by  Each  Cow  (Pounds). 
Alfalfa  Ration. 


Cow.s. 


Hay. 


Alfalfa. 


Bran. 


Corn-and- 
cob  Meal. 


Gluten 
Feed. 


Samantha,   . 
Fancy  II, 
Samantha  II, 
Cecile, 
Red  III,       . 
Daisy  II, 
Ida,       . 
Betty  II,       . 
Totals,   . 


336 

326 

280 

278 

336 

336 

308 

304 

336 

329 

224 

224 

280 

280 

308 

298 

2,408 


2,375 


448 


196 
140 
168 
168 
140 
140 
168 
168 


1,288 


134       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    186. 


Table  XXXII.  —  Total  Rations  consumed  by  Each  Cow  (Pounds)  —  Con- 
cluded. 

English  Hay  Ration. 


Cows. 


Samantha,    . 
Fancy  II, 
Samantha  II, 
Cecile, 
Red  III,       . 
Daisy  II, 
Ida.      . 
Betty  II,      . 
Totals,  . 


Hay. 


663 
5S3 
663 
586 
762 
442 
594 
604 


,767 


Alfalfa. 


Bran. 


448 


Corn-and- 
cob  Meal. 


616 


Gluten 
Feed. 


112 
84 

112 
84 
56 
56 
84 
84 


672 


Table  XXXIII.  —  Average  Daily  Ration  consumed  per  Cow  (Pounds). 


Character  of  Ration. 

Hay. 

Alfalfa. 

•Rnn          Corn-and- 
^'^'»°-         cob  Meal. 

Gluten 
Feed. 

Alfalfa 

English  hay,         .... 

10.7 
21.3 

10.6 

2 
2 

•5.8 
2.8 

3 

1 

The  above  tables  show  that  the  average  cow  on  the  aKalfa  ration  con- 
sumed 10.6  pounds  of  aKaKa  and  10.7  pounds  of  hay,  or  21.3  pounds  of 
roughage,  and  in  addition,  2  pounds  of  bran  and  5.8  pounds  of  corn-and- 
cob  meal;  while  on  the  hay  ration  the  average  cow  ate  21.3  pounds  of 
hay,  2  pounds  of  bran,  2.8  pounds  of  corn-and-cob  meal  and  3  pounds  of 
gluten  feed.  Different  cows  naturally  varied  from  this  average,  depending 
upon  their  individual  requirements.  It  was  a  comparison  of  ration  against 
ration,  and  not  one  single  feedstuff  against  another.  If  similar  rations 
were  used  by  a  dairjonan,  in  case  of  the  hay  ration  he  would  be  obliged 
to  purchase  2  pounds  of  bran  and  3  pounds  of  gluten  feed  for  each  animal; 
he  could  produce  the  hay  and  the  corn-and-cob  meal  upon  the  farm.  In 
case  of  the  alfalfa  ration  he  would  find  it  necessary  to  purchase  only  the 
2  pounds  of  bran  daily,  and  he  could  grow  the  remainder  of  the  ration. 
In  fact,  the  animals  probably  would  do  about  as  well  if  the  bran  were 
omitted  and  the  corn-and-cob  meal  correspondingly  increased. 


FEEDING  VALUE  OF  ALFALFA. 


135 


Table  XXXIV.  —  Estimated  Dry  and  Digestible  Nutrients  in  Average 
Daily  Rations  (Pounds). 


Character  of 
Ration. 

Dry 
Matter. 

Digestible  Organic  Nutrients. 

Nutri- 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Extract 
Matter. 

Fat. 

Total. 

tive 
Ratio. 

Alfalfa.      . 
English  hay, 

25.78 
26.09 

2.30 
2.07 

3.32 
3.95 

9.98 
9.76 

.41 
.46 

16.01 
16.24 

1  :6.17 
1  :7.11 

The  above  results  were  calculated  from  actual  analyses  and  average 
digestion  coefficients.  The  two  rations  do  not  vary  greatly  from  each 
other;  the  total  digestible  nutrients  are  about  the  same  and  Ukewise  the 
extract  matter.  The  amount  of  digestible  fiber  in  the  hay  ration  is  a  httle 
higher  and  the  protein  a  httle  lower.  The  daily  protein  consumption  is 
somewhat  higher  in  the  alfalfa  ration.  One  would  expect  substantially 
similar  results  from  the  two  rations.  Of  the  2.3  pounds  of  digestible  pro- 
tein in  the  alfalfa  ration,  L28  pounds,  or  55.8  per  cent.,  was  from  the 
alfalfa  hay,  and  the  balance  of  1.02  pounds  from  the  hay  and  grain.  In 
the  hay  ration  L05  pounds,  or  nearly  50  per  cent.,  of  the  protein  was  from 
the  hay,  and  the  balance  of  1.02  pounds  from  the  grain. 


Table  XXXV.  —  Gain  or  Loss  in  Live  Weight  (Pounds). 
Alfalfa  Ration. 


03 

c3 

M 

ja 

•3 

Q 

■a 

1 

a 
1 

a 

C3 

3 

Beginning,   .... 

827 

677 

777 

873 

805 

726 

1,062 

930 

- 

End 

815 

675 

772 

880 

783 

708 

1,030 

900 

- 

Gain  or  loss. 

—12 

—2 

— 5 

+7 

—22 

—18 

—32 

-30 

—114 

English 

Hay 

Ration. 

Beginning,   .... 
End 

860 
832 

675 
657 

827 
761 

895 
890 

777 
793 

725 
720 

1,068 
1,040 

942 
925 

- 

Gain  or  loss. 

—28 

—18 

—66 

—5 

+16 

—5 

—28 

—17 

-151 

'                                                                                                                                                                   ' 

The  cows  lost  somewhat  in  weight  on  both  rations. 


136       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    186. 


Table  XXXVI.  —  Yield  of  Milk  and  Milk  Ingredients. 

Alfalfa  Ration. 


Cows. 

Total 

Milk 

(Pounds). 

Daily 

Milk 

(Pounds). 

Solids 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Solids 
(Pounds). 

Fat  (Per 
Cent.). 

Fat 
(Pounds). 

Samantha, 

702.2 

25.07 

15.96 

112.07 

6.25 

43.89 

Fancy  II,  . 

667.0 

23.82 

13.23 

88.24 

4.73 

31.55 

Samantha  II, 

829.9 

29.64 

13.28 

110.21 

4.48 

37.18 

Cecile, 

762.8 

27.24 

13.64 

104.05 

4.85 

37.00 

Red  III,     . 

664.6 

23.73 

13.60 

90.39 

5.24 

34.83 

Daisy  II,   . 

516.6 

18.45 

14.15 

73.10 

4.93 

25.47 

Ida,    . 

655.6 

23.41 

14.59 

95.65 

5.67 

37.17 

Betty  II,    . 

741.4 

26.48 

13.41 

99.42 

4.52 

33.51 

Totals, 

5,540.1 

24.73 

13.96' 

773.13 

5.06' 

280.60 

English,  Hay  Ration. 


Samantha, 

766.9 

27.39 

14.79 

113.42 

5.69 

43.64 

Fancy  II,  . 

641.5 

22.91 

13.49 

86.54 

4.81 

30.86 

Samantha  II, 

841.1 

30.04 

13.28 

111.70 

4.41 

37.09 

Cecile, 

663.4 

23.69 

13.81 

91.62 

5.08 

33.70 

Red  III.     . 

632.7 

22.60 

13.68 

86.55 

5.39 

34.10 

Daisy  II,    . 

547.3 

19.55 

13.56 

74.21 

4.65 

25.45 

Ida,    . 

720.0 

25.71 

14.43 

103  90 

5.78 

41.62 

Betty  II,    . 

788.6 

28.16 

13.74 

108.35 

4.91 

38.72 

Totals, 

6,601.5 

25.00 

13.86' 

776.29 

5.09' 

285.18 

!._...'                                                                                                                                                                                    1 

I  Average  percentages  obtained  by  dividing  total  pounds  of  solids  and  of  fat  by  total  pounds 
of  milk. 


Table  XXXVII.  —  Average  Composition  of  the  Milk  (Per  Cent.). 


Chabacter  of  Ration. 


Total  Solids. 


Fat. 


Alfalfa, 
English  hay. 


13.96 
13.86 


5.06 
5.09 


FEEDING  VALUE  OF  ALFALFA. 


137 


Table  XXXVIII.  —  Dry  and  Digestible  Matter  required  for  Maintenance 
and  to  produce  Milk  and  Milk  Ingredients  (Pounds). 


Dry  Matter. 

Digestible  Nutrients. 

Character  of 
Ration. 

100 

Pounds 

Milk. 

1  Pound 
Solids. 

1  Pound 
Fat. 

100 

Pounds 

Milk. 

1  Pound 
Solids. 

1  Pound 
Fat. 

Alfalfa 

English  hay,     . 

104.24 
104.33 

7.47 
7.56 

20.57 
20.49 

64.73 
64.94 

4.64 
4.69 

12.78 
12.76 

The  tables  showing  the  yield  of  milk  and  milk  ingredients,  the  com- 
position of  the  milk  and  the  dry  and  digestible  matter  required  to  pro- 
duce milk  all  point  to  the  fact  that  the  two  rations  were  equally  effective. 
Only  in  case  of  live  weight  were  the  results  rather  against  the  hay  ration. 

Experiment  VII. 

Alfalfa,  Corn  Stover,  Corn-and-cob  Meal  and  Bran  v.  English  Hay,  Corn- 
and-cob  Meal,  Gluten  Feed  and  Bran  for  Milk  Production. 

In  Experiment  VI  the  feeding  effect  of  a  ration  composed  of  one-half 
English  hay,  one-half  alfalfa,  together  with  a  large  amount  of  corn-and- 
cob  meal  and  a  little  bran,  was  compared  with  a  ration  of  English  hay, 
corn-and-cob  meal,  gluten  feed  and  bran. 

In  the  present  experiment  (VII)  a  ration  composed  of  alfaKa,  cut  corn 
stover  and  a  large  amount  of  corn-and-cob  meal  with  a  small  amount  of 
bran  was  compared  with  a  ration  of  English  hay  and  substantially  Uke 
amounts  of  corn-and-cob  meal,  gluten  feed  and  bran. 

The  question  to  be  answered  is,  "Can  the  farmer  by  growing  alfalfa 
and  corn  get  along  without  purchasing  grain?" 

Plan.  —  Eight  cows  were  used  and  fed  by  the  usual  reversal  method. 
Because  the  cows  calved  at  diiYerent  times  the  eight  animals  were  not  all 
fed  between  the  same  dates,  but  in  groups  of  two. 

Table  XXXIX.  —  History  of  Cows. 


Cows. 

Breed. 

Age 
(Years). 

Last  Calf 
dropped. 

Served. 

Milk 
Yield, 
Begin- 
ning of 
Trial 
(Pounds). 

Samantha 
Red  III, 
Betty, 
Betty  II, 
Amy, 
Amy  II, 
Samantha 
Red  III, 

Grade  Holstein, 
Grade  Jersey, 
Grade  Jersey, 
Grade  Ayrshire, 
Pure  Jersey,    . 
Pure  Jersey,    . 
Grade  Holstein, 
Grade  Jersey, 

10 
8 
9 
6 
6 
4 

10 
8 

Aug.  26,  1913 
Aug.  23,  1913 
Nov.  23,  1913 
Oct.    18,  1913 
Dec.     9,  1913 
Dec.  17,  1913 
Aug.  26,  1913 
Aug.  23,  1913 

Nov.  19,  1913 
Nov.    2,  1913 
Apr.   13,  1914 
Jan.     9,  1914 
Mar.  14,  1914 
Jan.    30,  1914 
Nov.  19,  1914 
Nov.    2,  1913 

19.4 
24.5 
29.3 
26.4 
30.1 
24.1 
21.0 
20.5 

138       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    186. 


Table  XL.  —  Duration  of  Experiment. 


Dates. 


Alfalfa,  Corn  Stover, 
Corn-and-cob  Meal 
and  Bran  Ration 
Govt's. 


English  Hay,  Corn- 
and-cob  Meal,  Glu- 
ten Feed  and  Bran 
Ration  Cows. 


Length 

of 
Period 
(Weeks). 


Nov.  19  through  Dec.  23,  1913, 
Jan.  3  through  Feb.  6,  1914,       . 
Dec.  24,  1913,  through  Jan.  27,  1914, 
Feb.  6  through  Mar.  12,  1914, 
Jan.  21  through  Feb.  24,  1914, 
Mar.  4  through  Apr.  7,  1914, 
Feb.  28  through  Apr.  3,  1914, 
Apr.  11  through  May  15,  1914, 
[ 


Samantha, 
Red  III, 
Betty  II, 
Betty, 
Amy  II, 
Amy, 
Samantha, 
Red  III, 


Red  III, 
Samantha, 
Betty, 
Betty  II, 
Amy, 
Amy  II, 
Red  III, 
Samantha, 


The  care  and  feeding  of  the  animals,  time  of  weighing  and  method  of 
sampUng  feeds  and  milk  were  the  same  as  in  the  previous  trial. 

Character  of  Feeds.  —  The  hay  was  of  quite  satisfactory  quahty,  tim- 
othy predominating;  the  alfalfa  hay  was  also  of  average  quaUty.  The 
corn  stover  was  stooked  out  of  doors,  and  was  subject  to  weather  condi- 
tions. The  corn-and-cob  meal  was  made  from  corn  grown  upon  the 
station  grounds,  while  the  bran  and  gluten  feed  were  purchased. 


Table  XLI.  — 

Analyses 

of  Feeds  {Per  Cent.). 

Feed. 

Water. 

Ash. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Extract 
Matter. 

Fat. 

English  hay. 

11.30 

6.04 

9.32 

29.09 

42.50 

2.06 

Alfalfa  hay. 

11.90 

6.56 

14.45 

27.99 

36.95 

2.04 

Corn  stover. 

33.15 

4.44 

5.96 

23.24 

32.47 

.88 

Grain  mixture,  . 

11.16 

2.92 

17.09 

7.76 

57.32 

3.91 

Bran,          .... 

11.54 

5.89 

15.58 

10.47 

51.27 

4.80 

Corn-and-cob  meal, 

[ 

12.74 

1.33 

7.94 

5.30 

69.16 

3.27 

Table  XLII.  —  Total  Rations  consumed  (Pounds). 

English 
Hay. 

Alfalfa 
Hay. 

Corn 
Stover. 

Grain 
Mixture. 

Bran. 

Corn-and- 
cob  Meal. 

English  hay  ration  totals,  . 
Alfalfa  ration  totals,   . 

t 

5,873 

4,143            1,966 

2,240 

684 

1,559 

-3 

FEEDING  VALUE  OF  ALFALFA. 


139 


Table  XLIII.  —  Average  Daily  Ration  consumed  per 

Cow  {Pc 

unds). 

Character  of  Ration. 

English 
Hay. 

Alfalfa 
Hay. 

Corn 
Stover. 

Grain 
Mixture. 

Bran. 

Corn-and- 
cob  Meal. 

English  hay, 

Alfalfa 

21 

14.8 

7 

8 

2.44 

5.57 

The  "grain  mixture"  was  composed  of  a  mixture,  by  weight,  of  30 
parts  wheat  bran,  35  parts  gluten  feed  and  35  parts  corn-and-cob  meal. 

The  above  tabulations  show  that  a  ration  composed  of  hay  and  a  grain 
mixture  was  compared  with  a  ration  of  alfalfa,  some  corn  stover,  a  large 
amount  of  corn-and-cob  meal  and  a  rather  limited  amount  of  bran.  On 
the  basis  of  dry  matter,  the  alfalfa  ration  contained  80  per  cent,  alfalfa 
and  20  per  cent,  corn  stover. 

In  case  of  the  grains,  65  per  cent,  of  the  amount  fed  with  the  English 
hay  would  have  to  be  purchased,  and  only  30  per  cent,  of  that  fed  with 
the  alfalfa. 


Table  XLIV.  —  Estimated  Digestible  Nutrients  in  Average  Daily  Rations 

(Pounds) . 


Character  of  Ration. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Extract 
Matter. 

Fat. 

Total. 

English  hay 

Alfalfa 

1.89 
2.25 

4.32 
3.18 

9.08 
9.54 

.44 
.38 

15.73 
15.35 

;                                                                                                                                                                                         ] 

The  alfalfa  ration  furnished  rather  more  digestible  protein  than  the 
English  hay  ration,  although  it  is  believed  the  latter  ration  contained  all 
that  was  needed  by  the  animals.  The  English  hay  ration,  as  nearly  as 
can  be  estimated,  contained  rather  more  total  digestible  nutrients  than 
the  alfalfa  ration.  This  was  due  to  the  rather  high  moisture  content  of 
the  corn  stover  .fed  as  a  portion  of  the  alfalfa  ration.  On  the  basis  of 
digestible  nutrients,  one  would  expect  slightly  better  returns  from  the 
English  hay  ration. 

Table  XLV.  —  Gain  or  Loss  in  Live  Weight  (Pounds). 
English  Hay  Ration. 


C3 

03 

^ 

^ 

C3 

-a 

>> 

o 

a 

a 

a 

-% 

1 

O 

m 

Ph 

n 

pq 

< 

< 

m 

tf 

H 

Beginning 

1,137, 

045 

870 

907 

727 

830 

1,122 

955 

- 

End 

1,147 

960 

892 

903 

727 

785 

1,170 

955 

- 

Gain  or  loss, 

+10 

+  15 

+22 

-4 

I±: 

-45 

+48 

ris 

+46 

140       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    186. 

Table  XLV.  —  Gain  or  Loss  in  Live  Weight  (Pounds)  —  Concluded. 

Alfalfa  Ration. 


— — 

d 

ca 

XI 

■  : 

.a 

a 

Cj 

>, 

>> 

B 

e 

E 

T3 
? 

p 

m 

« 

n 

m 

< 

< 

w 

P^ 

H 

Beginning 

1.090 

905 

867 

870 

713 

770 

1,075 

970 

- 

End 

1,167 

915 

850 

860 

700 

734 

1,075 

975 

- 

Gain  or  loss, 

ti 

—23 

+  10 

—17 

—10 

—13 

—36 

± 

+5 

—84 

"■■-1 

It  is  evident  that  the  cows  gained  slightly  on  the  hay  and  grain  ration 
and  lost  somewhat  on  the  alfalfa,  corn  stover  and  grain  ration.  Cow 
Amy  was  not  in  very  good  condition  and  lost  noticeably  in  weight  during 
both  feeding  periods. 


Table  XLVI.  —  Yield  of  Milk  and  Milk  Ingredients. 
English  Hay  Ration. 


Cows. 

Total 

Milk 

(Pounds). 

Daily 

Milk 

(Pounds). 

Solids 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Solids 
(Pounds). 

Fat  (Per 
Cent.). 

Fat 
(Pounds). 

Red  III 

705.8 

21.9 

13.61 

104.23 

4.85 

37.14 

Samantha, 

768.0 

21.9 

15.73 

120.81 

5.75 

44.16 

Betty, 

998.3 

28.5 

13.84 

138.16 

4.71 

47.02 

Betty  II,    . 

1,000.2 

28.6 

13.90 

139.03 

4.73 

47.31 

Amy, 

972.9 

27.8 

13.81 

134,36 

5.09 

49.52 

Amy  II, 

727.4 

20.8 

15.15 

110.20 

5.77 

41.97 

Red  III,     . 

713.2 

20.4 

14.28 

101.84 

5.30 

37.80 

Samantha, 

762.3 

21.8 

14.82 

112.97 

5.33 

40.63 

Totals, 

6.708.1 

24.0' 

14.33' 

961.60 

5.151 

345.55 

Alfalfa  Ration. 


Red  III 

740.5 

21.2 

14.40 

106.63 

5.52 

40.88 

Samantha, 

658.1 

18.8 

15.54 

102.27 

5.96 

39.22 

Betty, 

837.4 

23.9 

13.51 

113.13 

4.69 

39.27 

Betty  II,    . 

970.1 

27.7 

14.17 

137.46 

4.92 

47.73 

Amy, 

835.4 

23.9 

13.87 

115.87 

5.10 

42.61 

Amy  II,      . 

789.2 

22.6 

14.89 

117.51 

5.59 

44.12 

Red  III,     . 

637.4 

18.2 

13.96 

88.98 

5.19 

33.08 

Samantha, 

691.5 

19.8 

14.98 

103.60 

5.37 

37.13 

Totals, 

6,159.6 

22.01 

14.37' 

885.45 

5.26' 

324.04 

•  Average. 


FEEDING  VALUE  OF  ALFALFA.  141 

It  is  very  evident  that  the  hay  and  grain  ration  gave  noticeably  larger 
returns  of  milk  and  milk  ingredients  than  did  the  alfalfa  ration.  The 
alfalfa  ration  produced  8.2  per  cent,  less  milk  and  8.6  per  cent,  less  milk 
solids  than  did  the  English  hay  ration. 

The  writer  is  convinced  that  the  milk  shrinkage  on  the  alfalfa  ration 
was  due  largely  to  the  corn  stover.  While  of  good  quality  it  was  stooked 
out  of  doors  and  brought  to  the  barn  every  few  days  and  cut  fine  before 
being  fed.  It  varied  considerably  in  moisture  content,  depending  upon 
the  weather.  If  the  stover  had  been  brought  from  the  field  in  November 
and  stored  under  cover,  in  all  probability  more  satisfactory  results  would 
have  been  secured. 


142       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    186. 


Part    II. 

THE  VALUE  OF  CORN  BRAN  FOR  MILK 
PRODUCTION. 


Summary  and  Suggestions. 

1.  Corn  bran  contains  noticeably  less  ash,  protein  and  fat,  and  some- 
what more  extract  or  starchy  matter,  than  does  wheat  bran. 

2.  Digestion  experiments  with  sheep  recently  made  at  this  station 
showed  that  80  per  cent,  of  its  dry  matter  was  digestible  as  against  66  per 
cent,  for  wheat  bran. 

3.  A  definite  amount  of  dry  matter  contained  in  a  ration  composed  of 
hay,  gluten  feed,  ground  oats,  cottonseed  meal  and  corn  bran  produced, 
in  an  average  of  two  experiments,  substantially  as  much  milk  and  rnilk 
ingredients  as  a  like  amount  of  dry  matter  in  a  ration  composed  of  hay, 
gluten  feed,  ground  oats,  cottonseed  meal  and  wheat  bran. 

4.  The  gains  in  live  weight  were  about  the  same  on  each  ration. 

5.  Corn  bran,  if  properly  combined  in  a  grain  ration,  is  likely  to  give 
as  satisfactory  returns  as  wheat  bran.  It  may  constitute  30  per  cent,  of 
the  ration,  together  with  30  per  cent,  cottonseed  or  linseed  meal,  20  per 
cent,  corn  or  hominy  meal,  and  20  per  cent,  gi-ound  oats;  or  a  ration 
may  be  combined  consisting  of  40  per  cent,  corn  bran,  20  per  cent,  gluten 
feed,  20  per  cent,  cottonseed  or  linseed  meal,  and  20  per  cent,  ground  oats 
or  barley.  A  combination  of  corn  bran,  gluten  feed  and  corn  meal  would 
not  be  satisfactory  because  of  a  deficiency  in  ash,  and  because  aU  three 
constituents  would  be  derived  from  corn. 

The  Experiment  in  Detail. 

What  Corn  Bran  is.  —  Corn  bran  is  the  hull  or  skin  of  the  corn  kernel, 
together  with  a  small  amount  of  the  germ,  and  the  starchy  portion  which 
it  is  impossible  to  separate  out  in  the  process  of^  manufacture  of  various 
corn  products,  such  as  starch  and  glucose.  The'  bran  thus  obtained  was 
formerly  dried  and  sold  by  itself,  but  at  present  it  is  more  often  sold  as  a 
constituent  of  hominy  feed  or  proprietary  mixed  feeds,  or  is  mixed  with 
corn  gluten  as  a  component  of  gluten  feed.  It  is  still  sometimes  found  in 
the  markets  of  Massachusetts,  and  has  been  offered  at  a  reasonable  price. 
It  has  been  shown,  by  means  of  experiments'  conducted  at  various  times, 

1  Massachusetts  Experiment  Station  Bulletin  No.  181,  p.  316. 


VALUE  OF  CORN  BRAN  FOR  MILK  PRODUCTION.   143 

to  be  well  digested  by  ruminants ;  its  energy  value  as  compared  with  corn 
meal  at  100  is  equal  to  82.  In  the  minds  of  many  feeders  corn  bran  is 
considered  a  quite  inferior  product,  and  at  best  of  doubtful  feeding  value. 
Method  of  conducting  the  Ex'periment.  —  In  order  to  demonstrate  its 
value  two  feeding  experiments  with  cows  were  carried  out  at  this  station 
during  1917  and  1918.  In  one  case  six  and  in  the  other  eight  cows  were 
fed  by  the  reversal  method,  for  two  periods  of  five  weeks  each,  on  a  basal 
ration  of  hay,  gluten  feed,  ground  oats  and  cottonseed  meal.^  Half  of 
the  cows  in  each  case  received  in  addition  4  pounds  of  corn  bran  during 
the  first  periods  of  the  experiments,  while  the  other  half  received  a  like 
amount  of  wheat  bran.  In  the  second  periods  the  corn  and  wheat  brans 
were  interchanged.  At  the  outset  the  cows  used  in  each  experiment  were 
as  carefully  mated  in  regard  to  yield  of  milk  and  period  of  lactation  as 
possible,  so  that  the  two  herds  receiving  the  different  rations  would  vary 
in  general  performance  but  very  little.  Their  names  and  arrangement 
may  be  found  in  Tables  I  and  II. 

1  A  little  cottonseed  meal  was  added  to  each  ration  in  the  second  experiment  in  order  to  insure 
against  the  possible  ill  effect  of  having  too  great  a  proportion  of  the  grains  derived  from  corn  in 
the  corn  bran  half  of  the  trial. 


144      MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    186. 


t— ( 

CO       H 


-®--^ 

^ri- 

S 

g 

8 

o 

o 

g 

'S,'? 

^ 

^o 

o 

M'^s 

rs'a  0 

spg 

I? 

Z 

PU 

Z 

0 

il 

lO 

o 

K 

S 

o 

^ 

o 

o 

:ss 

^ 

^ 

^(S 

13 

1 

. 

. 

I 

. 

> 

Ul 

' 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

t- 

r^ 

t- 

r^ 

t> 

b- 

«4-l         . 

OS 

OS 

"S"? 

*-t 

.-H 

oS. 

m 

^ 

-w  a 

m  o 

►3-S 

bt 

bn 

>. 

>, 

btl 

>. 

3 

P 

q 

3 

3 

-< 

->; 

"-3 

>-> 

< 

f-s 

bi  d 

'^>^ 

•w" 

rt 

a 

c 

a 

a 

b" 

>> 

OJ 

!i! 

.iS 

Fh 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

►i^ 

W 

K 

W 

w 

w 

IS 

o 

o 

o> 

<s> 

a> 

•o 

■o 

•o 

-0 

T3 

T3 

OJ 

at 

01 

el 

01 

0) 

o 

O 

O 

o 

o 

o 

is 

o 

O 

> 

d 

'-' 

e3 

es 

.c 

M 

J3 

R 

n 

13 

a 

§ 

.2 

Fl 

g 

«"" 

^ 

W 

U 

u 

w 

CQ     1 

o 

o 

o 

u» 

o 

o 

ir> 

•* 

■^ 

■* 

•* 

■* 

to 

■* 

•* 

o> 

00 

OS 

to 

N 

c^ 

(M 

IM 

<N 

O 

t>. 

" 

^ 

t^ 

OO 

OO 

t^ 

t. 

^ 

1 

o> 

o> 

OS 

OS 

OS 

OS 

OS 

CD 

00 

«o 

oT 

oo" 

CO 

c^T 

•"* 

'"• 

1 

1 

> 
o 

fl' 

a' 

> 

o 

O 

t. 

t^ 

t^ 

r^ 

t~ 

t^ 

t^ 

t^ 

OS 

o> 

2 

OS 

OS 

OS 

OS 

OS 

M 

(M 

" 

«,- 

CO 

Os" 

to 

CO 

>. 

bi) 

>. 

bi 

bii 

>s 

P 

•3 

1-5 

3 

3 

"-5 

Q 

3 
< 

3 

3 

"-5 

•^ 

■«" 

■* 

CO 

OS 

t>. 

00 

CO 

fl 

s 

c 

>. 

s 

>. 

>> 

?< 

•^ 

K 

K 

K 

1-5 

►i^ 

K 

w 

o 

<D 

o 

V 

ffl 

<a 

<B 

a> 

TS 

-d 

■r) 

"d 

T3 

-a 

T3 

-B 

Si 

01 

o! 

o3 

C3 

01 

01 

d 

o 

O 

O 

O 

o 

O 

o 

a 

> 

G 

j3 

.q 

> 

13 

13 

S 

o 

>> 

01 

fl 

"a 

P 

ts 

« 

O 

CB 

^ 

Ph 

M 

d  u 

VALUE  OF  CORN  BRAN  FOR  MILK  PRODUCTION.   145 

As  in  all  feeding  experiments,  a  sufficient  preliminary  period  was  al- 
lowed at  the  beginning  of  each  trial  for  the  cows  to  become  accustomed 
to  the  rations,  and  for  their  alimentary  tracts  to  become  emptied  of  what- 
ever food  they  may  previously  have  been  receiving.  For  the  same  reason 
a  transitional  period  was  allowed  between  the  two  halves  of  each  experi- 
ment. These  periods  were  of  at  least  ten  days'  duration.  The  exact 
dates  are  given  in  Table  II. 

The  amounts  of  hay  and  grains  fed  the  various  cows  daily  were  care- 
fully calculated  for  each  animal,  on  the  basis  of  its  milk  and  maintenance 
requirements,^  and  from  personal  knowledge  of  the  particular  animal's 
appetite. 

The  general  care  and  management  of  the  animals,  as  well  as  the  methods 
of  sampling  milk,  hay  and  grain,  were  similar  to  those  already  described 
in  the  foregoing  experiments.  The  hay  which  was  used  in  the  rations 
was  raised  on  the  experiment  station  farm,  and  was  of  average  uniformity 
and  good  quality.  All  the  grains  were  of  standard  quality.  The  daily 
and  total  amount  of  each  feed  per  cow  may  be  found  in  the  following 
table,  as  well  as  the  average  and  total  amounts  per  herd:  — 

'  T.  L.  Haeker,  Minnesota  Bulletin  No.  140,  p.  56. 


146       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    186. 


1 


1 


e:^ 


e2 


>> 

n 

•a 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

0  s 

« 

^S 

O 

t^ 

>, 

■<)< 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o> 

^ 

>o 

o 

•< 

si 

C-q 

J^ 

o 

p 

S5 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

O 

1 

o 

H 

■* 

Q 

>, 

S 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

to 

^^ 

H 

Q 

•* 

■* 

,^ 

CO 

CO 

CO 

P^ 

15 

» 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

73 

o 

to 

o 

o 

o 

t.. 

ta 

ui 

CO 

ta 

o 

o 

a 

H 

"^ 

z 

!^ 

< 

■s 

K 

m 

p 

■< 

P4 

•« 

1 

n 

&: 

^ 

>> 

•a 

s 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

05 

^ 

o 

o 

o 

o 

•< 

CO 

^ 

' 

a 

p 

00 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

oo 

1 

js 

eo 

Tj* 

•^ 

CO 

o 

^ 



^ 

o 

!^ 

e> 

o 

o 

o 

o 

•d 

CD 

^^ 

00 

,_« 

IM 

,_, 

o 

5 

P 

O 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

"3 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

s 

s 

s 

115 

s 

lO 

s 

H 

•o 

00 

<o 

t^ 

■*" 

^ 

> 

o 

A 

^ 

j3 

>> 

a 

d 

0 

01 

C3 

13 

bS 

ej 

a 

Fi 

a 

o 

u 

fe 

UJ 

u 

u 

w 

cw 

00 

a 

t- 

o 

*"' 

a 

M 

^ 

n 

> 

-0 

'4. 

3 

o 

Q 

1 

4 

> 
< 

s 

oo 

f2 

o 

o 

p 

1 

1 

1 

' 

1        1        1        1 

o 

o 

o 

cq 

CI 

OI 

^~* 

o 

o 

o 

lO 

f^ 

00 

CO 

o 

o 

o 

<r> 

lO 

o 

o 

o 

'"' 

CO 

CO 

CO 

o 

o 

o 

o 

US 

o 

o 

o 

c^ 

to 

lO 

to 

lO 

o 

o 

o 

"^ 

•* 

•>1< 

■* 

•»J" 

o 

o 

o 

•* 

■* 

' 

• 

1 

1 

1 

1 

o 

o 

o 

o> 

,^ 

C<l 

,_, 

to 

c» 

c<« 

M 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

t^ 

U3 

i-T 

> 

' 

HH 

• 

. 

a 

OS 

JS 

ja 

a 

a 

a 

o3 

ctl 

mI 

o 

u 

m 

M 

PLI 

on 

f. 

o> 

^ 

C4 

1 

> 

.a 

o 

tin 

iz; 

3 

o 

1 

^ 

o 

t^ 

s 

00 

^ 

o 

o 

p 

VALUE   OF   CORN  BRAN  FOR  MILK  PRODUCTION.      147 


1       1 

1       1 

1       1 

1       1 

o     o 

lO       o 

■  i 

g      § 

o      o 

U5        O 
b-       O 

o 
o 

§ 

eo 

■>J<            T)l 

1      ■* 

s  s 

O          1 

1        1 

1       1 

1       1 

1        1 

24.00 
18.00 

'  1 

o      o 
o      o 

o      o 

OO        CO 

o 
m 

1  i  .  . 
s  1 

So.. 

^ 

o 

lO 

o 

lO 

'~* 

eo 

'^ 

'^ 

"^ 

eo 

'"' 

'^ 

""" 

^^ 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

»o 

o 

U5 

o 

c^ 

U5 

C^l 

•o 

lO 

o 

o 

o 

O 

o 

o 

o 

"5 

o 

o 

o 

•o 

N 

(M 

" 

(M 

« 

'"' 

CJ 

•^ 

^ 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

U5 

lo 

o 

tr> 

t^ 

N 

"5 

' 

00 

^^ 

00 

eo 

00 

« 

lO 

o 

o 

§ 

o 

§ 

CO 

'"' 

^~* 

'"' 

eo 

eo 

*"' 

o 

u? 

<M 

c^ 

C^l 

lO 

"5 

eo 

— 

o 

u 

e 

1       1       1       1       1       1       1       I 
1       1       1       1       1       1       1       1 

1       1 

1       1 

O 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

■* 

■* 

tK 

■* 

■* 

•* 

-* 

•<1< 

M* 

« 

oq 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

1 

.<> 

■^ 

"rj* 

-^ 

v. 

*"* 

■  ' 

'  ' 

'  ' 

'  ' 

'    ' 

'   ' 

*  ' 

""1 

o 

'"' 

o 

M. 

CO 

o 

o 

o 

o 

at 

<M 

M 

o 

o 

CO 

' 

o 

C<l 

<M 

o 

o 

o 

in 

^ 

^ 

lO 

o 

o 

o 

lO 

■^ 

o 

o 

lO 

C^l 

o 

' 

CO 

'^ 

^^ 

O 

lO 

h-J" 

> 

. 

e« 

ei 

^^ 

rt 

l-l 

^ 

M 

.4 

> 

^ 

a 

a 

(31 

a 

>> 
o 

a 

>. 

^ 

d 

•B 

03 

fi 

H 

M 

f1 

cS 

« 

u 

Oi 

w 

1^ 

Ph 

W 

U 

00 

CD 

o 

ti 

>. 

g 

^ 

J 

3 

2 

o 

J3 

Xi 

«^ 

o 

o 

> 

H 

< 

•s 

s. 

Cc 

< 

«      .2 


jS         ^ 


— <  tn 


ot 

w 

."? 

•a 

-o 

«3 

H 

a 

■a 

g  -Q  ^ 


>, 

"3 
3 

fe 

1 

d 
^ 

S 

03 

o 

c 

a 

eo 

3 

g 

O 

4) 

a 

o 

i; 

J3 

i: 

a 

-0 

a 

'"' 

^ 

.2 

Oi 

Q. 

T3 

is 

O 

^ 

3 

o 

U 

•71 

n 

s 

0) 

e^4 

148       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    186. 


-d 

3 


O 


0^ 


-^ 

s 
e 


o 
O 

>> 

3.00 
1.50 
1.00 
1.00 
3.00 
1.50 
1.50 
1.50 

>n 

"o 

10        (M         10        »0        »C        M         (M        C5 

o»oeocooioo*o 

0 

m 

H 
■< 

O 

Q 

z 

o 

« 

Q 

oooooooo 

100«0>0"5000 

'       3 

i 

e2 

oooooooo 

»00»0»010000 

§       , 

t^int^cqt^oioo 

•0 

0 

a 

O 

P 

000                        00 
0      *o      0                        10      »o 

1   5 

"3 
1 

0      S      0                        S      § 
tri      ci      ta                       <^      CO 

CO        C3        0                                  10         iO 

0 

CO 

J5 

H 

1              ■*! 

"3 

oooooooo 

0               1 

^ 

„„^„«rtrt« 

-^ 

S5 
< 
« 

pq 

iz 
« 
o 
O 

■3 
P 

1       1       1       1       1       1       1       1 

1                 1 

"3 
"0 

1      1      t      1      1      1      1      1 

1                 1 

-■J 

"3 
P 

tocot-otoooo 
t-r-ootoOJooo 

0      «o      eo      03      o»      e<i      e^'      —i 

■              0 

oooooocio 

COCDiOOcoO^O 
cOOtOuDGOOOW^ 

0 

CO 

^      1 

00 
W5 

1 

CS      S"     3      0      «      0      3      § 

fePnCOOWOoDCO 

c 

n 

il 
< 
3 

00 

"-I                                       o» 
eq                                 0 

■a            ^ 
i            1 

1 

■i             s 

'0     > 

VALUE  OF  CORN  BRAN  FOR  MILK  PRODUCTION.   149 


Table  III.  —  Analyses  of  Feeds  {Per  Cent.). 
Experiment  I. 


Average 
Mois- 
ture. » 

Dry 

Matter.  > 

Dry  Matter. 

Feed. 

Ash. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Extract 
Matter. 

Fat. 

Hay 

Corn  bran. 
Wheat  bran, 
Gluten  feed. 
Ground  oats. 

/    11.63 
1    10.252 

f    12.90 
I    11.81 

1    11.33 
\   10.97 

f    10.44 
\   10.30 

1    11.16 
I   10.23 

88.37 
89.752 

87.10 
88.19 

88.67 
89.03 

89.56 
89.70 

88.84 
89.77 

1     6.35 
1     1.05 
1     7.13 

j     4.72 
1     3.88 

8.28 
7.76 
17.23 
30.52 
11.52 

32.39 
11.79 
10.23 
7.13 
11.67 

50.32 
78.19 
60.90 
54.78 
67.71 

2.66 
1.21 
4.51 

2.85 
5.22 

Experiment  II. 


Hay,  .... 

11.34 
10.58 

88.66 
89.42 

5.88 

7.83 

33.68 

50.35 

2.26 

Corn  bran. 

12.62 
11.59 

•  87.38 
88.41 

1.31 

7.36 

12.62 

77.36 

1.35 

Wheat  bran, 

11.55 
11.99 

88.45 
88.01 

7.05 

16.31 

11.25 

59.90 

5.49 

Gluten  feed. 

9.42 
9.29 

90.58 
90.71 

3.87 

29.66 

8.17 

55.49 

2.81 

Ground  oats. 

10.66 
10.39 

89.34 
89.61 

3.72 

11.99 

n.88 

66.91 

5.60 

Cottonseed  meal. 

9.60 
9.11 

90.40 
90.89 

6.23 

38.64 

13.10 

34.77 

7.26 

1  The  two  figures  in  each  case  represent  the  average  of  three  samples  taken  in  each  half  of  the 
trials. 

^  In  case  of  cows  Samantha  IV  and  Colantha  II  special  samples  of  hay  had  to  be  taken  during 
the  second  half  of  the  experiment  for  moisture  determinations,  and  the  figures  derived  are  as 
follows:  Samantha  IV,  moisture  10.38,  dry  matter  89.62;  Colantha  II,  moisture  9.86,  dry  mat- 
ter 90.14. 

The  variations  in  composition  of  the  hay  and  grain  used  were  com- 
paratively slight.  The  average  analyses  of  the  corn  and  wheat  brans 
used  in  the  two  experiments  compare  as  follows  on  the  dry-matter  basis :  — 


Table  IV.  —  Average  Analyses  of  the  Corn  and  Wheat  Brans  {Per  Cent.). 


Ash. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Extract 
Matter. 

Fat. 

Corn  bran, 

Wheat  bran,         .... 

r— ■ — -.-'-^  '-^   -    ' -—^ 

1.18 
7.09 

7.56 
16.77 

12.20 
10.74 

77.78 
60.40 

1.28 
5.00 

150      MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    186. 

Wheat  bran  contains  more  ash,  protein  and  fat,  and  noticeably  less 
extract  or  starchy  matter,  than  does  the  corn  bran.  In  using  corn  bran 
as  a  component  of  a  dairy  ration  these  differences,  particularly  the  ash 
and  protein,  would  have  to  be  given  consideration. 

By  applying  the  percentages  of  dry  matter  of  the  various  feeds  as  given 
in  Table  III  to  the  amounts  fed  (Table  II),  the  amounts  of  dry  matter 
fed  can  easily  be  obtained.  Only  the  totals  for  the  herds  and  the  aver- 
age per  animal  for  each  herd  are  given  in  Table  V. 


Table  V.  —  Total  Amount  and  Average  Daily  Amount  of  Dry  Matter 
consumed  (Pounds). 

Experiment  I. 
Corn  Bran  Ration. 


• 

Hay. 

Corn 
Bran. 

Wheat 
Bran. 

Gluten 
Feed. 

Ground 
Oats. 

Cotton- 
seed 
Meal. 

Total 

Daily  average,   . 

3,834 
18.26 

733 
3.50 

- 

593 
2.83 

374 

1.78 

- 

Wheat  Bran  Ration. 

Total,         .... 
Daily  average,   . 

3,840 
18.26 

747 
3.55 

596 
2.84 

375 
1.79 

- 

ExPERrMENT    II. 

Car?}  Bran  Ration. 

Total 

Daily  average,   . 

5,155 
18.42 

984 
3.52 

- 

333 

1.19 

444 
1.59 

470 
1.68 

Wheat  Bran  Ration. 

Total,         .... 
Daily  average,   . 

5,153 
18.41 

- 

988 
3.53 

333 
1.19 

444 
1.59 

469 
1.68 

During  the  two  experiments  the  total  amount  of  dry  matter  consumed 
by  the  cows  receiving  the  corn  bran  ration  was  12,920  pounds,  while  the 
cows  receiving  the  wheat  bran  ration  consumed  substantially  the  same, 
or  12,945  pounds.  Of  these  totals,  1,717  pounds  represented  corn  bran 
and  1,735  pounds  wheat  bran.  For  convenience  the  average  daily  amounts 
of  dry  matter  consumed  per  cow  in  the  two  rations  of  both  experiments 
are  here  tabulated. 


VALUE  OF  CORN  BRAN  FOR  MILK  PRODUCTION.   151 


Table  VI.  —  Average  Daily  Aviount  of  Dry  Matter  consumed  per  Cow 

(Pounds). 


Ration. 

Hay. 

Corn 
Bran. 

Wheat 
Bran. 

Gluten 
Feed. 

Ground 
Oats. 

Cotton- 
seed 
Meal.  I 

Corn  bran, 

Wheat  bran, 

18.34 
18.34 

3.51 

3.54 

2.01 
2.02 

1.73 
1.74 

1.59 
1.59 

An  application  of  the  percentage  composition  of  each  feed  as  given  in 
Table  III  to  the  above  figures  would  give  the  amounts  of  protein,  fat, 
fiber,  etc.,  each  ration  contained,  and  this  in  turn  multiplied  by  average 
digestion  coefficients-  would  give  the  approximate  digestible  nutrients  in 
each  ration. 


Table  VII.  —  Estimated  Dry  and  Digestible  Nxdrients  in  Average  Daily 

Rations  {Pounds). 


Dry 

Matter. 

Digestible  Nutrients. 

Nutri- 

Character of 
Ration. 

Protein. 

Fiber. 

Extract 
Matter. 

Fat. 

Total. 

tive 
Ratio.' 

Corn  bran, 
Wheat  bran, 

26.39 
26.42 

1 

1.92 

2.23 

4.12 
4.01 

9.75 
9.16 

.44 

.52 

16.23 
15.92 

1  :7.72 

1  :6.40 

.     ...   ,      3 

It  wdll  be  seen  that  the  dry  and  digestible  matter  consumed  in  each 
ration  was  almost  identical.  The  digestible  protein  contained  in  the  corn 
bran  ration  was  some  14  per  cent,  less  than  that  in  the  wheat  bran  ration. 
It  is  believed,  however,  that  a  surplus  remained  after  making  the  usual 
allowance  for  maintenance  and  milk  requirements. 

'  Used  in  Experiment  II  only. 

'  Coefficients  used  were  the  results  of  determinations  made  with  sheep.  Lack  of  space  pro- 
hibited printing  them  here. 

'  Fat  taken  to  equal  2.2  times  carbohydrates. 


152       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION    BULLETIN    186. 


Table  VIII.  —  Yield  of  Milk  and  Milk  Ingredients. 


Experiment  I. 
Corn  Bran  Ration. 


Dates. 

Cows. 

Milk 
(Pounds). 

Solids 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Solids 
(Pounds). 

Fat 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Fat 
(Pounds). 

Oct.  24  through  Nov.  27, 
1917. 

Dec.  8,  1917,  through  Jan. 
11,  1918. 

Peggy, 

Samantha  II, 
Colantha  II, 
Colantha,    . 
Samantha  III,    . 
Samantha  IV, '  . 

559.7 
981.7 
797.6 
633.0 
691.4 
896.9 

16,20 
12.99 
13.12 
12.63 
13.82 
12.93 

90.67 
127.52 
104.65 
79.95 
95.55 
116.00 

6.95 
4.61 
4.43 
4.11 
4.90 
4.18 

38.90 
45.26 
35  33 
26.02 
33.88 
37.60 

Totals, 
Average,'  . 

4,560.3 

13.47 

614.34 

4.76 

216.89 

Wheat  Bran  Ration. 


Oct.  24  through  Nov.  27, 
1917. 

Colantha,    . 
Samantha  III,    . 

601.2 
699.4 

12.45 
13.56 

74.85 
94.84 

4.19 
4.89 

25.19 
34.20 

Samantha  IV,     . 

837.4 

12.59 

105.43 

4.15 

34.75 

Dec.  8,  1917,  through  Jan. 
11,  1918. 

Peggy, 
Samantha  II, 

605.6 
1,058.1 

16.17 
13.01 

97.93 
137.66 

6.80 
4.53 

41.18 
47.93 

Colantha  II, '      . 

871.6 

13.12 

114.35 

4.33 

37.74 

Totals, 

4,673.3 

625.06 

- 

220.99 

Average,  2  . 

- 

13.38 

4.73 

- 

Experiment  II. 
Corn  Bran  Ration. 


Feb.  20  through  Mar.  26, 
1918. 

Red  IV,      . 
Colantha,   . 

945.1 
584.8 

13.65 
12.63 

129.01 
73.86 

5.07 
4.03 

47.92 
23.57 

Samantha  III,    . 

672.4 

13.68 

91.98 

4.66 

31.33 

Samantha  IV,     . 

851.3 

12.82 

109.14 

4.10 

34.90 

Apr.  6  through  May  10, 
1918. 

Fancy  III, 
Peggy, 

889.0 
496.9 

12.42 
15.28 

110.41 
75.93 

4.35 
6.21 

38.67 
30.86 

Samantha  II, 

886.6 

12.91 

111.46 

4.43 

39.28 

Colantha  II, 

675.9 

13.67 

92.40 

4.59 

31.02 

Totals, 

6,002.0 

- 

797.19 

- 

277.55 

Average,'  . 

r 

- 

13.28 

- 

4.62 

- 

1  See  footnote,  Table  II. 

2  Average  obtained  by  dividing  total  pounds  of  solids  and  fat  by  total  pounds  of  milk. 


VALUE  OF  CORN  BRAN  FOR  MILK  PRODUCTION.   153 


Experiment  II  —  Concluded. 
Wheat  Bran  Ration. 


Dates. 

Cows. 

Milk         ^^^^ 
(Pounds),   ci^^^) 

Solids 
(Pounds). 

Fat 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Fat 
(Pounds). 

Feb.  20  through  Mar.  26, 
1918. 

Apr.  6  through  May  10, 
1918. 

Fancy  III, 
Peggy, 
Samantha  II, 
Colantha  II, 
Red  IV,      . 
Colantha,    . 
Samantha  III,    . 
Samantha  IV,     . 

933  3 
552.0 
1,004.8 
765.8 
832.8 
463.9 
633.9 
828.9 

12.61 
15.20 
12.84 
13  33 
13.68 
12.99 
13.63 
12.78 

117.69 
83.90 
129.02 
102.08 
113.93 
60.26 
86.40 
105.93 

4.42 
6.24 
4.36 
4  31 
5.02 
4.36 
4.78 
4.18 

41.25 
34.44 
43.81 
33.01 
41.81 
20.23 
30  30 
34.65 

Totals, 
Average,!  , 

6,015.4 

13.29 

799.21 

4.65 

279.50 

'  Average  obtained  by  dividing  total  pounds  of  solids  and  fat  by  total  pounds  of  milk. 

The  total  milk  produced  in  the  two  experiments  on  the  corn  bran 
ration  was  10,562.3  pounds,  and  10,688.7  pounds  on  the  wheat  bran  ra- 
tion, an  increase  of  1.19  per  cent,  in  favor  of  the  latter.  The  total  solids 
produced  on  the  corn  bran  ration  amounted  to  1,411.5  pounds  as  against 
1,424.3  pounds  for  the  wheat  bran.  The  corn  bran  ration  produced  494.4 
pounds  of  fat  as  against  500.5  pounds  on  the  wheat  bran  ration,  an  in- 
crease of  1.3  per  cent. 

Table  IX.  —  Gain  or  Loss  in  Live  Weight  (Pounds). 


Ration. 

Experiment  I. 

Experiment  II. 

Totals. 

»    Gain. 

Loss. 

Gain. 

Loss. 

Corn  bran,          .... 
Wheat  bran,        .... 

93 
91 

32 

8 

86 
106 

18 
50 

+  129    J 

i 

+  139    4 

A  slight  gain  was  made  on  each  ration. 


BULLETIIsr  I^o.  18T 


DEPARTMENT    OF    MICROBIOLOGY. 


CLARIFICATION  OF  MILK. 


Part    I 


I.    INTRODUCTION. 

The  Significance  op  the  Clarifier. 

The  use  of  the  clarifier  has  been  an  outgrowth  of  the  employment  of 
the  "separator"  in  an  attempt  to  clarify  or  purify  milk.  Since  the  func- 
tion of  the  "separator"  is  to  remove  the  fat  from  milk,  the  addition  of  a 
new  function  to  this  machine  presented  complications  not  easily  overcome 
in  a  single  machine,  for  as  improvement  takes  place  in  the  primary  purpose 
of  the  separator,  retrogression  may  be  instituted  in  the  secondary,  as  in 
this  case,  —  the  clarification  or  purification  of  milk.  The  separation  of 
fat  from  milk  is  not  desired  in  clarification,  yet  it  is  desirable  to  accomplish 
what  the  separator  also  succeeds  in  doing  in  part,  —  the  removal  of  for- 
eign and  unwholesome  elements  so  far  as  this  is  possible.  A  single- 
purposed  machine  is  susceptible  of  higher  development  simply  because 
it  does  not  have  to  compromise  with  other  and  foreign  purposes.  Ac- 
cordingly, there  is  good  reason,  as  a  basis,  for  endeavoring  to  perfect  a 
machine  which  wUI  perform  the  single  function  of  clarification  in  its 
highest  degree. 

What  is  Clarification? 

It  is  the  work  of  this  comparatively  new  machine,  known  as  a  clarifier, 
which  has  been  subjected  to  careful  study  in  this  laboratory.  Its  func- 
tion, not  its  mechanism,  has  been  studied. 

Milk  is  poured  into  the  machine  from  which  it  emerges  as  milk.  In  its 
passage  through  it  has  lost  that  substance  which  adheres  to  the  bowl  of 
the  machine,  —  the  slime.  The  problem  before  us,  therefore,  takes  this 
form :  What  is  the  slime,  and  in  its  removal  from  milk  has  it  improved  or 
injured  the  milk?  The  fullest  answer  which  can  be  given  at  this  time  is 
the  substance  of  this  continued  thesis.  The  categorical  reply  to  this 
question  cannot  be  given  till  the  close  of  this  laboratory's  studies,  which, 


156       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 

it  is  to  be  hoped,  may  eventually  have  fairly  covered  the  field  compre- 
hensively as  well  as  quite  intensively. 

The  present  attitude  toward  the  clarifier  is  reflected  by  the  Commission 
on  Milk  Standards^  wliich  offers  a  status  on  clarification.  Summing  up 
the  points  bearing  upon  milk  purification  by  the  clarifier  are  found  these 
views :  — 

Favorable :  — 

(a)  It  removes  visible  dirt. 

(b)  It  removes  inflammatory  products,  including  many  of  the  causative  germs. 

(c)  It  performs  the  work  of  the  strainer,  but  in  a  much  more  efficient  manner. 

Against :  — 

(a)  It  removes  visible  dirt,  but  not  all  disease-producing  germs,  and  hence  mis- 
leads the  consumer  as  to  the  real  purity  of  the  milk. 

(6)  It  does  not  remove  urine  or  the  soluble  portion  of  feces;    nevertheless  the 
milk  appears  clean. 

(c)   It  adds  another  process  requiring  the  handling  of  the  milk,  complicating  the 
situation. 
/    (c?)  It  largely  destroys  the  value  of  the  dirt  test,  though  no  more  so  than  good 
straining. 

(e)    It  breaks  up  clumps  of  bacteria  and  distributes  them  through  the  milk. 

(/)    The  exact  nature  of  the  material  removed  is  not  yet  fully  understood. 

The  essence  of  the  above  assertions  is  found  in  the  bewildering  effect 
it  produces  on  the  mind  of  a  critical  reader,  for  it  both  asserts  and 
does  not  assert.  When  the  summary  concludes  thus:  "The  exact  nature 
of  the  material  removed  is  not  j^et  fully  understood,"  it  neutrahzes  the 
first  effect  produced  and  causes  a  fog  to  settle  on  the  rather  precocious 
opinions  preceding.  It  is  unfortunate  that  the  reader  is  left  to  speculate 
concerning  the  realities  which  actually  lie  submerged  beneath  this  opales- 
cent atmosphere.  It  is  fitting,  therefore,  to  analj^ze  these  statements,  not 
exhaustively,  but  a  little  more  closely,  just  for  the  purpose  of  indicating 
their  looseness. 

Putting  several  of  these  statements  together,  the  thought  is  thrown 
into  one  or  two  channels:  — 

(a)  It  removes  visible  dirt. 

(6)   It  performs  the  work  of  a  strainer,  but  in  a  much  more  efficient  manner. 

(c)  It  removes  visible  dirt,  but  not  all  disease-producing  germs,  and  hence  mis- 
leads the  consumer  as  to  the  real  purity  of  the  milk. 

(d)  It  largely  destroys  the  value  of  the  dirt  test,  though  no  more  so  than  good 
straining. 

In  other  words,  it  removes  visible  dirt  more  effectively  than  any  strainer. 
"Confusing  the  consumer,"  "the  total  elimination  of  organisms,"  and 
"the  effect  on  a  test"  have  no  relation  to  its  claim.  It  may  be  said,  too, 
that  straining  of  milk  must  be  as  reprehensible  in  misleading  the  consumer 
as  clarifying,  for  does  it  not  prepare  the  consumer  for  a  more  sightly 
product?  Yet  straining  is  upheld.  The  authors  feel  confident  that  such 
assertions  as  the  above  will  mislead  the  reader. 

1  U.  S.  PubUc  Health  Service,  Public  Health  Reports,  Vol.  2,  No.  7,  p.  17. 


CLARIFICATION   OF   MILK.  157 

Again,  "it  does  not  remove  all  the  disease-producing  organisms." 
It  would  be  a  rare  centrifuging  machine  which  would  claim  such  a  func- 
tion as  eliminating  all  pathogenic  micro-organisms,  in  the  light  of  what  is 
known  about  centrifuging  out  such  forms.  Selective  elimination  of  this 
nature  savors  of  the  superhuman  at  present,  and  implies  more  than  is 
possible.     The  clarifier  is  the  product  of  human  effort. 

"It  destroys  the  value  of  the  dirt  test."  This  is  rated  as  an  unfavorable 
quality,  yet  is  considered  favorable  in  the  case  of  straining.  One  might 
ask  whether  it  is  desirable  to  remove  as  much  dirt  as  possible,  or  allow  it 
to  remain  simply  to  make  the  dirt  test,  occasionally  applied,  effective? 

If  the  authors  were  to  sum  up  these  statements  as  they  stand,  they 
must  conclude  that  the  clarifier  is  a  far  more  efficient  strainer,  which  is 
allowed,  apparently,  than  any  now  in  use. 

A  criticism  of  the  clarifier,  very  peculiar  because  of  its  subtle  nature,  is 
introduced :  — 

"  (6)  It  does  not  remove  urine  or  the  soluble  portion  of  feces;  neverthe- 
less the  milk  appears  clean."  The  implication  here  is  far-reaching,  for 
the  reader  might  think  that  there  is  such  a  machine  or  device,  on  the  one 
hand  or  on  the  other,  and  that  such  a  claim  is  made  for  the  clarifier  or  a 
centrifuge.  Why  such  an  assertion  is  left  in  its  baldness  for  lay  readers  to 
digest  the  writers  cannot  understand.  Does  any  device  accomplish  it, 
does  even  pasteurization  of  milk,  which  is  a  sort  of  panacea  advocated  by 
this  commission  for  all  milk  trouble,  overcome  what  is  intimated?  That 
such  products  exist  even  in  the  best  of  milk,  in  an  infinitesimal  degree, 
cannot  be  denied,  but  it  seems  a  strange  assertion  in  connection  with  a 
review  of  clarification.     Why  not  explain? 

Here  is  another  very  interesting  assertion  (this  is  properly  made): 
"(e)  It  breaks  up  clumps  of  bacteria  and  distributes  them  through  the 
milk."  This  is  well-founded,  but  what  is  the  result?  The  need  of  an 
answer  to  this  is  apparent  and  it  should  accompany  the  statement. 
Does  the  commission  know?  In  a  general  way,  how  often  is  such  a 
reason  given? 

"(c)  It  adds  another  process  requiring  the  handling  of  the  milk,  com- 
plicating the  situation."  Here,  too,  is  one  of  those  statements  which  are 
so  commonly  brought  forth  to  "clinch"  an  argument.  Has  man  ever 
hesitated  to  utilize  a  new  device,  when  such  a  device,  so  far  as  he  can  de- 
termine, improves  the  product,  even  if  it  does  entail  a  new  movement? 
It  corresponds  very  closely  with  the  exclamation  of  a  certain  writer  who 
had  done  no  particular  work  with  the  clarifier,  and  who  closed  his  review 
with,  "What  next?" 

The  authors  have  perhaps  colored  this  very  brief  analysis  too  highly 
by  specific  selections,  but  not  without  a  purpose.  They  have  not  even 
done  it  to  criticize,  although  criticism  may  be  merited  in  a  way.  The 
object  has  been  to  bring  conspicuously  before  the  reader  the  confused 
condition  of  minds  and  the  lack  of  knowledge  as  well  as  the  existence  of 
certain  substrata  of  prejudice  relevant  to  a  new  device  (the  clarifier) 


158       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 

designed  to  meet  a  specific  demand  which  had  been  fostered  by  the  fre- 
quent use  of  another  device  (the  separator)  for  clarification. 

On  the  other  hand,  criticism  could  be  easily  framed  from  a  review  of 
literature  of  manufacturing  firms  which  has  for  its  purpose  the  setting 
forth  of  the  merits  of  the  clarifier.  Wliile  the  specific  statements  have 
a  modicum  of  truth  and  a  basis  in  fact,  the  reader  is  left  to  deduce  a 
quantitative  estimate  which  is  very  misleading.  There  exists  a  sinister 
purpose  beneath  the  surface  which  is  not  commendable.  How,  for  in- 
stance, is  the  reader  to  gather  the  significance  of  a  photograph  of  slime 
deposit  when  he  knows  nothing  about  its  relation  to  the  milk?  Is  he  to 
infer  that  milk  which  may  be  highly  infectious  to  man  is  rendered  safe 
when  passed  through  a  clarifier?  Such  a  statement  and  many  others,  by 
inference,  are  highly  reprehensible,  and  should  not  be  tolerated  by  in- 
telhgent  men.  If  the  clarifier  cannot  prove  its  value  per  se,  then  it  is  rightly 
questioned  and  should  be  weighed  in  the  balance  of  exacting  scrutiny. 
Let  this  new  contribution  be  judged  by  its  work  stated  in  concrete  and 
sane  speech.  It  is  only  fair  to  the  public  to  have  sanitarians  and  manu- 
facturers alike  deal  frankly  and  honestly  with  such  matters  as  clarification. 

Such  statements  need  study,  and  some  of  them  should  not  have  been 
written  before  a  careful  investigation  had  been  made. 

Clarification  aims  to  assist  in  the  purification  of  milk.  Does  it  do  it 
or  does  it  not,  and  to  what  degree?  This  is  the  definite  goal  toward  which 
the  work  of  this  laboratory  has  been  directed.  At  the  start  it  is  frankly 
allowed  that  the  best  way  to  secure  pure  milk  is  to  have  a  sound  cow  and 
obtain  the  milk  free  from  dirt  and  disease  contamination.  This  is  a 
recommendation  difficult  to  execute.  Human  knowledge  and  performance 
are  weak.  It  seems  impracticable  to  many  minds.  The  clarifier  is 
offered  as  a  means  to  assist  in  accomplishing  what  man  as  a  machine  fails 
to  do.  The  performance  of  the  clarifier  is  bound  up  in  what  is  re- 
moved in  the  slime,  and  in  how  the  removal  of  this  slime  affects  the  milk 
from  which  it  has  been  eliminated. 

II.    SLIME. 

Slime  is  that  material  which  is  removed  from  the  milk  during  the  process 
of  clarification,  and  which  adheres  to  the  bowl  of  the  clarifier.  It  consists, 
speaking  in  a  general  manner,  of  the  so-called  leucocytes  or  epithelial 
cells  of  milk,  or  corpuscular  elements  of  milk,  so-called  fibrin  which  exists 
in  milk  in  the  form  of  microscopic  shreds,  traces  of  casein,  traces  of  fat, 
traces  of  milk  sugar,  inflammatory  products  such  as  garget  at  times, 
bacteria,  yeasts,  molds  which  succeed  in  entering  the  milk,  and  the  in- 
soluble dirt  which  may  be  present  in  the  milk,  or  other  foreign  insoluble 
particles  which  may  find  their  way  into  the  milk,  —  in  short,  anything 
which  may  be  suspended  and  not  in  solution  in  milk  and  which  will  respond 
to  centrifugalization.^ 

1  A  clarifier  is  a  centrifuge,  accordingly  these  terms  are  employed  interchangeably  as  well  as 
centrifugalization  and  clarification. 


CLARIFICATION  OF  MILK.  159 

These  substances  which  make  up  the  slime  will  be  subjected  to  individual 
scrutiny  as  progress  is  made. 

Amount  of  Slime  removed. 

The  amount  of  slime  removed  by  the  clarifier  depends  upon  many 
factors,  as  may  be  guessed  from  its  component  parts.  Besides  the  in- 
fluence of  the  constituents  of  milk,  temperature,  acidity  or  age  of  milk, 
individuality  of  the  cow,  the  condition  of  the  machine,  the  number  of 
revolutions  of  the  bowl,  and  probably  many  other  factors  determine  the 
amount  of  slime  within  its  total  limitations  or  the  amount  which  is  possible 
within  a  given  amount  of  milk.  Then,  too,  as  clarification  proceeds,  the 
character  —  perhaps  more  specifically  and  accurately  the  consistency  — 
of  the  slime  changes,  which  is  doubtless  attributable  to  the  mechanical 
action  of  the  clarifier. 

Determination  of  the  Weight  of  Slime. 
As  a  rule,  in  literature  moist  weight  is  employed  to  report  the  amount 
of  slime.  If  conditions  were  identical  when  clarifjdng,  the  clarifiers  the 
same,  the  amount  of  milk  passed  of  the  same  measurement,  then  possibly 
a  fairly  representative  lot  of  determinations  could  be  established.  This 
seems  very  difficult,  however,  as  will  be  gathered  later.  Owing  to  this 
fluctuation  in  the  moisture  content,  it  is  essential  that  the  moisture  be 
eliminated  to  constant  weight  before  comparisons  can  be  satisfactorily 
made  and  a  true  interpretation  of  the  amount  estabhshed.  For  many 
purposes  this  additional  labor  may  be  avoided  and  the  moist  weight  will 
serve.  Accordingly,  it  was  found  desirable  early  in  the  work  to  establish 
the  variatiouo  in  the  determinations  of  the  amount  of  slime  from  different 
sources,  since  difficulty  was  met  in  the  interpretation  of  results  when  based 
upon  moist  weight  alone.  The  determinations  furnished  are  based  on 
clarification  of  milk  at  the  same  temperature,  the  same  mUk  and  the  same 
age  of  milk,  the  use  of  the  same  machine,  the  same  number  of  revolu- 
tions per  minute, — in  short,  the  same  methods  and  procedures  throughout. 
It  is  therefore  a  test  of  methods  and  procedures,  and  has  its  very  im- 
portant bearing  upon  slitne  determination.  The  weights  are  always  re- 
corded as  moist  or  dry  weight. 


160       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 


Table  I.  —  A  Determination  of  the  Weight  of  Slime  under  Moist  and  Dry 

Conditions. 

[Thirty  pounds  of  milk  used  for  each  sample;  milk  was  held  at  70°  F.J 


Number 
of  Test. 

Slime. 

Sample. 

MOIST  WEIGHT  IN  — 

DRY   WEIGHT  IN  — . 

Grams. 

Per  Cent, 
of  MUk. 

Grams. 

Per  Cent, 
of  MUk. 

I 

1 

2 

6.7100 
6.5905 

.049 
.048 

1.6217 
1.6017 

.011 
.011 

II, 

1 
2 

5.6425 
5.7036 

.041 
.041 

1.3136 
1.3836 

.009 
.010 

Ill 

1 
2 

6.7544 
6.4483 

.049 
.047 

1.6317 
1.5180 

.011 
.011 

IV 

1 

2 

4.4049 
4.0133 

.032 
.029 

1.1150 
.9540 

.008 
.007 

V 

1 
2 

4.8775 
4.6215 

.035 
.033 

1.1551 
1.2510 

.008 
.009 

VI 

1 
2 

5.1382 
5.0012 

.037 
.036 

1.3598 
1.2746 

.009 
.009 

VII 

1 
2 
3 
4 

5.8314 
6.4810 
4.8073 
4.3109 

.042 
.047 
.035 
.031 

1.3770 

1.6286 

1.0482 

.9965 

.010 
.011 
.007 
.007 

VIII 

1 
2 

6.6093 
6.7741 

.048 
.049 

1.5088 
1.6839 

.011 
.012 

IX 

1 
2 

5.8910 
6.0158 

.043 
.044 

1.4629 
1.4715 

.010 
.010 

X 

1 
2 
3 
4 

4.5792 
4.2663 
4.8683 
4.5678 

.033 
.031 
.035 
.033 

1.1793 
1.0558 
1.2783 
1.1552 

.008 
.007 
.009 
.008 

XI 

1 
2 
3 
4 

6.2538 
6.0309 
6.1542 
6.0529 

.045 
.044 
.045 
.044 

1.5084 
1.4379 
1.4725 
1.4218 

.008 
.010 
.010 
.010 

XII 

1 
2 

5.3230 
5.3092 

.039 
.038 

1.2436 
1.2552 

.009 
.009 

XIII 

1 

2 
3 

4.6834 
4.6892 
4.7127 

.034 
.034 
.034 

1.2756 
1.2417 
1.2526 

.009 
.009 
.009 

XIV 

1 
2 
3 

4.6806 
4.7212 
4.6300 

.034 

■       .034 

.034 

1.2756 
1.2526 
1.3900 

.009 
.009 
.010 

XV 

1 
2 

7.1353 
7.0018 

.052 
.051 

1.9734 
1.9546 

.014 
.014 

XVI, 

1 
2 

7.0210 
7.1330 

.051 
.052 

1.9232 
2.0017 

.014 
.014 

XVII, 

1 

2 

5.8702 
5.8702 

.043 
.043 

1.3654 
1.3821 

.010 
.010 

Literature  is  quite  consistent  in  the  amount  of  slime  given  off  in  clarifica- 
tion. The  necessity  for  constant  weight  is  evident  from  the  preceding 
table  if  exact  determinations  for  comparison  are  to  be  made. 


CLARIFICATION  OF   MILK. 


161 


The  Dctenninations  of  Others.  —  Bahlman'  says  the  weight  of  material 
deposited  in  the  clarifier  from  725  gallons  of  milk  was  2|  pounds.  As  an 
average,  then,  1  gallon  of  milk  jdelded  1.6  grams  of  moist  sludge  (.044  per 
cent.)  equivalent  to  .6  gram  (.01  per  cent.)  of  dried  material. 

In  his  "Studies  on  the  Clarification  of  Milk,"  Hammer^  gives  the  follow- 
ing amounts  of  slime  secured  from  different  lots  of  milk:  • — 

Table   II.  —  Amounts  of  Slime  obtained  from  Different   Lots  of  Milk 

{Hammer) . 


Pounds  of 

Milk 
Clarified. 

Amount  of 

Slime 

Deposited 

in  Cubic 

Centimeters. ' 

Per  Cent, 
of  Slime 
Removed. 

Pounds  of 

Milk 
Clarified. 

Amount  of 

Slime 

Deposited 

in  Cubic 

Centimeters. ' 

Per  Cent. 

of  Slime 

Removed. 

635 

70 

.024 

953 

65 

.015 

837 

125 

.032 

1,249 

125 

.022 

725 

90 

.027 

1,147 

250 

.048 

1,150 

70 

.013 

1,356 

125 

.020 

918 

70 

.016 

1,241 

100 

.017 

1,169 

45 

.008 

There  has  been  contributed  to  this  theme  the  experience  of  Mcln- 
erney:*  — 


Table  III.  —  Amowwi  of  Slime  obtained  from  Different  Quantities  of  Milk 

{Mclnerney). 


Experiment. 


Milk  used 
(Ounces). 


Slime 
obtained 
(Ounces). 


Per 

Cent,  of 

Slime. 


1, 
2, 
3, 

4, 
6. 
6, 
7, 


82,964 
87,680 
88,960 
89,088 
84,480 
84,480 
84,480 


5.64 
7.65 
6.98 
6.49 
6.80 
12.62 
8.25 
6.45 


.0063 
.0092 
.0080 
.0073 
.0076 
.0149 
.0091 
.0076 


»  Bahlman,  Clarence:  Milk  Clarifiers.    Am.  Jour,  of  Public  Health,  1916,  Vol.  VI,  No.  8,  p.  856. 
»  Hammer,- B.  W.:   Agricultural  Experiment  Station,  Iowa  State  College  of  Agriculture  and 
Mechanic  Arts.     Research  Bulletin  No.  28,  January,  1916. 

•  This  appears  to  be  moist  slime  measiu-ed  in  cubic  centimeters. 

*  Mclnerney,  T.  J.:   Clarification  of  Milk.    Cornell  University  Agricultural  Experiment  Sta- 
tion.   Bulletin  No.  389,  April,  1917,  p.  496. 


162       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 

The  author  states:  "After  all  the  milk  had  been  passed  through,  the 
machine  was  taken  apart  and  the  amount  of  slime  deposited  on  the  walls 
was  carefully  removed,  placed  in  a  bottle,  and  weighed."  He  does  not 
say  whether  it  is  moist  weight  or  dry  weight. 

It  is  apropos  that  the  extensive  work  of  Lieutenant  Davies^  be  in- 
serted here,  inasmuch  as  it  contributes  very  suggestive  data.  The  authors 
present  it  exactly  as  it  was  found.  The  results  secured  furnish  informa- 
tion upon  slime-yield  nowhere  else  to  be  found, and  it  has  these  advantages: 
The  amount  of  slime  is  measured  from  milk  of  individual  cows,  and  where 
it  has  been  possible  to  point  out  abnormaUties  this  has  been  done.  In  the 
interpretation  of  Lieutenant  Da  vies'  results  it  will  be  well  to  keep  in  mind 
that  very  small  amounts  of  milk  were  used,  which  usually  leads  to  a  high 
percentage  of  moisture  in  the  slime;  that  the  weight  is  moist  weight  which 
is  subject  to  great  fluctuation;  and  that  the  diagnosis  of  abnormaUties 
appears  crude  because  no  intimate  study  has  been  made.  Yet  these  data 
are  far  more  suggestive  of  what  is  involved  in  the  process  of  clarification, 
so  far  as  sUme  production  is  concerned,  than  can  be  gleaned  from  almost 
any  other  source. 

Clarification  of  Certified  Milk  (Da vies). 
Methods. 

De  Laval  Clarifier  No.  95  was  used  in  this  work,  its  capacity  being  well 
suited  for  the  work,  the  quantities  of  mUk  from  each  cow  being  very  variable 
and  usually  small.  In  place  of  the  tank  suppUed  with  the  clarifier  a  funnel 
was  fitted  so  that  given  quantities  could  be  easily  measured.  At  the  same 
time  there  was  the  advantage  that  every  bit  of  milk  could  be  passed  through 
the  bowl  without  rinsing  with  water;  also  no  particles  of  dirt  could  remain  on 
the  side.  While  the  latter  was  of  no  consequence  with  the  certified  milk,  it 
does  make  a  difference  with  the  ordinary  market  milk. 

Three  bowls  were  used;  this  allowed  plenty  of  time  for  washing  and  steriliz- 
ing them.  The  bowl  shell  was  weighed  while  quite  dry  before  the  test.  The 
milk  was  clarified  immediately  after  being  drawn,  4  quarts  being  used  where 
possible;  if  less  than  4  quarts,  then  all  the  milk  was  clarified.  The  bowl  was 
allowed  to  run  down  itself,  any  attempt  to  stop  it  quickly  seemed  to  shake 
the  sUme  film  off  on  to  the  discs,  and  weighing  was  impossible.  The  bowl  was 
wiped  dry  and  weighed;  the  amount  of  slime  was  calculated  in  per  cent,  of 
milk  clarified. 

The  cows  were  tested  as  often  as  circumstances  would  allow.  No  attempt 
was  made  to  keep  any  definite  order,  it  being  found  best  to  test  whenever  the 

1  Lieut.  E.  L.  Davies  was  connected  with  this  department  as  a  graduate  assistant  at  the  time 
this  work  was  done.  It  was,  however,  executed  independently  of  this  bulletin  and  as  a  minor 
thesis.  He  was  majoring  in  microbiology  and  pursuing  dairying  as  one  of  his  minors  in  his 
graduate  work.  He  became  restless  when  the  war  opened  and  tried  many  times  to  enter  the 
Canadian  service,  but  was  refused  on  account  of  physical  disability.  He  was  invited  by  Prof. 
Dan  H.  Jones  of  the  Ontario  Agricultural  College  to  become  a  member  of  the  bacteriological  staff. 
Remaining  there  for  a  period,  and  removing  his  physical  disability  at  the  same  time,  he  again 
became  restless  for  active  service.  He  was  accepted  into  the  officers'  school.  After  several 
months  of  training  on  this  side,  together  with  local  service,  he  was  sent  to  France.  He  experienced 
active  service  in  the  trenches  at  once.  Within  six  weeks  he  was  shot  down  by  Germans  whom  he 
was  making  prisoners. 


CLARIFICATION   OF   MILK. 


163 


milk  and  clarifier  were  ready  together;  in  this  way  no  inconvenience  due  to 
waiting  was  caused  the  milker. 

In  the  table  on  pages  163-175  the  breed  of  the  cow  is  designated  by  the  initial 
letter  of  the  breed,  a  prefix  "R"  designating  "registered,"  prefix  "G"  desig- 
nating "grade."     Example,  G.  G.,  —  Grade  Guernsey. 

Ages  are  given  in  years  and  months  approximately.  Weeks  in  lactation 
calculated  from  the  first  week  of  lactation. 

Number  of  tests  made,  440,  with  74  different  cows. 

1  cow  tested  11  times. 

1  cow  tested  10  times. 

5  cows  Rested  9  times. 
14  cows  tested  8  times. 
13  cows  tested  7  times. 
12  cows  tested  8  times. 

9  cows  tested  5  times. 

6  cows  tested  4  times. 
6  cows  tested  3  times. 
5  cows  tested  twice. 

2  cows  tested  once. 

Sixty-five,  or  14.7  per  cent.,  showed  bloody  slime.  Seventy-four,  or  16.8 
per  cent.,  gave  .1  per  cent.  sUme  or  over.  Average  sUme  for  440  tests, 
.067  per  cent. 


Cow. 

Date. 

Weeks 
in  Lac- 
tation. 

Milk 
(Pounds). 

Slime 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Remarks. 

No.  1.    R.  J.,  age,  12  years, 
6  months. 

June  16 
July     1 

12 
14 

13.9 
12.5 

.090 
.195 

Bloody. 

July     8 

15 

12.2 

.070 

July     9 

15 

13.3 

.060 

July  18 

16 

12.0 

.065 

July  21 

16 

11.0 

.145 

Bloody. 

July  28 

18 

12.5 

.100 

Bloody. 

Aug.    3 

19 

12.0 

.055 

No.  19.    G.  H.,  age,  11  years, 

June  20 

35 

12.5 

.115 

June  24 
June  25 
July  10 

35 
35 
37 

9.5 
10.7 
9.5 

.340 
.187 
.030 

Very    swollen    udder, 

slime  bloody. 
Swelling  nearly  gone, 

bloody. 

July  22 

39 

8.7 

.060 

July  29 
July  30 

40 
40 

6.3 
5.3 

.215 
.105 

Swollen    udder,    slime 

pussy  and  bloody. 
Swollen  udder. 

Aug.  10 

41 

7.0 

.065 

Bloody. 

No.  21.    G.  H.,  age,  2  years, 
8  months. 

June    9 
June  16 

20 
21 

8.0 
7.4 

.095 
.040 

June  23 

22 

7.4 

.020 

164      MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 


Cow. 


Date. 


Weeks 


Milk 


Slime 


in  Lac-    /p",,^„\        (Per 
tation.     (Pounds),     ^ent.). 


Remarks. 


No.  21 — Continued. 


No.  22.    G.  H.,  age,  14  years, 


No.  23.    G.  J., 
7  months. 


age,  2  years. 


No.  24.    G.  J.,  age,  9  years. 


No.  26.    G.  A.,  age,  3  years, 
4  months. 


No.  48.    R.  A.,  age,  8  years, 
4  months. 


July  6 

July  20 

July  23 

July  31 

June  18 
June  19 
June  20 
July  3 
July  6 
July  24 

June  9 
June  16 
June  26 
July  8 
July  29 

June  11 
June  17 
June  30 
July  1 
July  31 
Aug.  10 

June  9 
June  26 
July  6 
July  8 
July  13 
July  27 
July  29 
Aug.    6 

June  16 
June  24 
June  30 
July  3 
July  10 
July  14 
July  20 


24 
26 
26 
27 


18 
19 
20 
22 
24 

2 
3 
5 
5 
9 
10 

55 
57 
58 
58 
60 
61 
61 
62 

14 
15 
16 
16 
17 
17 
18 


7.4 

.925 

6.8 

.015 

6.8 

.060 

7.3 

.045 

11.0 

.295 

14.8 

.292 

14.0 

.180 

16.0 

.110 

17.9 

.130 

17.1 

.015 

11.3 

.052 

10.5 

.030 

10.7 

.080 

9.9 

.050 

9.6 

.075 

16.5 

.115 

15.0 

.035 

14.8 

.065 

13.3 

.045 

13.8 

.095 

13.2 

.025 

9.0 

.065 

8.2 

.050 

7.9 

.035 

7.2 

.045 

6.4 

.095 

7.8 

.060 

8.1 

.055 

6.8 

.010 

15.8 

.090 

16.0 

.062 

15.7 

.075 

14.0 

.090 

14.9 

.150 

12.6 

.095 

14.2 

.235 

First  milking. 


No  trouble. 


Sore  teat. 

Bloody. 
No  trouble. 


Swollen  udder. 

Swollen  udder. 

Slime    bloody,    udder 
swollen  badly. 


CLARIFICATION   OF  MILK. 


165 


Cow. 

Date. 

Weeks 
in  Lac- 
tation. 

Milk 
(Pounds). 

Slime 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Remarks. 

No.  48  —  Continued. 

July  23 

18 

13.7 

.080 

July  31 

19 

13.2 

.020 

Aug.    8 

20 

13.6 

.020 

No.  52.    R.  J.,  age,  6  years, 
3  months. 

June  16 
June  23 

13 
14 

11.1 
10.2 

.075 
.035 

June  26 

14 

11.4 

.025 

July     1 

15 

10.5 

.025 

July  23 

18 

10.4 

.075 

Aug.    1 

19 

10.6 

.065 

Aug.    3 

19 

11.1 

.070 

No.  56.    G.  J.,  age,  6  years, 
6  months. 

June    9 
June  19 

6 

7 

15.4 
11.8 

.060 
.295 

June  20 

7 

12.5 

.070 

June  25 

8 

12.5 

.047 

1 

July     1 

9 

12.2 

.055 

« 

July  20 

12 

11.6 

.055 

July  28 

13 

10.2 

.075 

' 

Aug.    6 

14 

11.0 

.020 

No.  54.    G.  J.,  age, 

June    9 

30 

7.0 

.165 

Bloody. 

June  18 

31 

6.0 

.095 

June  26 

32 

7.0 

.055 

July     1 

33 

7.1 

.050 

July  20 

36 

8.5 

.025 

July  27 

37 

7.9 

.045 

Aug.    1 

37 

6.2 

.030 

Aug.  10 

38 

3.2 

.110 

No.  59.    G.  H.,  age,  13  years. 

June  20 

30 

6.5 

.055 

June  25 

30 

10.5 

.075 

July     6 

32 

11.1 

.045 

July   18 

33 

10.0 

.050 

July  24 

34 

10.0 

.065 

Bloody. 

July  30 

35 

10.3 

.035 

Aug.    8 

36 

10.7 

.085 

No.  60.    G.  H.,  age,  12  years. 

June  15 

32 

7.8 

.160 

Hind  quarter  sore. 

June  24 

33 

7.3 

.085 

Bloody. 

July     1 

34 

5.8 

.095 

Pus  like. 

166 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN   187. 


■  Cow. 

Date. 

Weeks 
in  Lac- 
tation. 

Milk 
(Pounds). 

Slime 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Remarks. 

No.  60  — Continued. 

July  13 

36 

5.2 

.070 

July  22 

37 

3.8 

.045 

July  31 

38 

5.0 

.100 

Bloody. 

No.  82.    G.  H.,  age,  11  years, 

July    3 

- 

11.0 

.385 

First  milking. 

July    4 

- 

12.2 

.260 

July  21 

3 

15.8 

.030 

July  28 

4 

17.1 

.060 

Aug.    8 

6 

15.1 

.085 

No.  63.    G.  S.,  age,  10  years, 

June    8 

23 

13.5 

.100 

June  18 

24 

12.4 

.080 

June  24 

25 

12.8 

.040 

Bloody. 

July   10 

27 

11.7 

.065 

No.  64.    G.  S.,  age,  10  years. 

June    8 

40 

3.8 

.138 

June  15 

41 

3.6 

.140 

• 
No.  66.    G.  H.,  age,  11  years. 

June  11 

48 

9.5 

.085 

June  17 

49 

8.8 

.060 

July     1 

51 

11.4 

.045 

July  18 

53 

8.8 

.080 

July  19 

53 

9.2 

.095 

July  28 

54 

8.5 

.085 

Bloody. 

No.  68.    G.  G.,  age,  5  years, 
1  month. 

June  11 
June  23 

32 
33 

8.0 
8.7 

.085 
.070 

Bloody. 

July     7 

36 

7.2 

.060 

July  22 

38 

7.0 

.040 

Aug.    1 

39 

6.5 

.055 

No.  69.    G.  H.,  age,  4  years, 
8  monthS; 

June  17 
July     1 

10 
12 

19.4 
18.2 

.140 
.032 

July     7 

13 

19.2 

.105 

Bloody. 

July   14 

14 

17.2 

.060 

July  20 
July  30 

15 

16 

18.0 
16.8 

.115 

.105 

Bloody,  swollen 

ter. 
Bloody. 

quar- 

No.  71.    G.  H.,  age, 

June    8 

47 

20.8 

.050 

June  12 

47 

17.4 

.070 

June  18 

48 

16.0 

.065 

June  23 

49 

15.3 

.070 

CLARIFICATION    OF   MILK. 


167 


Cow. 

Date. 

Weeks 
in  Lac- 
tation. 

Milk 
(Pounds) 

Slime 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Remarks. 

No.  71  — Continued. 

July     9 

51 

15.0 

.015 

July  13 

51 

18.8 

.060 

July  21 

52 

14.8 

.080 

July  29 

64 

11.9 

.065 

Aug.    6 

55 

15.1 

.020 

No.  72.    R.  G.,  age,  6  years, 
9  months. 

June  11 
June  17 

45 
46 

6.0 
6.0 

.070 
.140 

June  26 

47 

5.0 

.026 

July     7 

49 

7.7 

.075 

No.  75.    G.  G.,  age, . 

June    9 

19 

13.5 

.110 

Bloody,  sore  teat. 

June  10 

19 

13.5 

.100 

June  15 

20 

11.0 

.060 

June  25 

21 

10.0 

.060 

July     3 

22 

10.0 

.065 

July  22 

25 

8.4 

.055 

July  28 

26 

9.4 

.070 

Aug.  10 

28 

5.6 

.025 

No.  76.    G.  G.,  age, 

June  10 

18 

13.5 

.085 

Sore  teat. 

June  19 

19 

13.6 

.100 

Sore  teat. 

June  26 

20 

10.5 

.040 

July     1 

21 

10.1 

.105 

Sore  quarter  and  teat. 

July-    7 

22 

9.5 

.050 

July  20 

24 

9.0 

.090 

July  28 

25 

8.8 

.085 

Aug.    3 

25 

8.5 

.090 

No.  77.    R.  J.,  age,  4  years, 
9  months. 

June  12 
June  16 

50 
50 

7.8 
9.3 

.035 
.065 

June  25 

52 

8.0 

.035 

July     3 

53 

9.5 

.050 

July  21 

55 

14.8 

.055 

July  28 

56 

8.1 

.045 

No.  78.    G.  G.,  age, . 

June  23 

- 

14.8 

.065 

July     7 

- 

12.2 

.040 

July  21 

T 

12.0 

.065 

July  29 

- 

11.1 

.015 

168 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN   187. 


Cow. 

Date. 

Weeks 
in  Lac- 
tation. 

Milk 
(Pounds). 

Slime 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Remarks. 

No.  80.    R.  A.,  age,  5  years, 
2  months. 

June  24 
July    3 

- 

9.5 
8.9 

.025 
.040 

July     8 

- 

8.5 

.055 

July  13 

- 

6.5 

.020 

July  20 

- 

7.5 

.040 

July  30 

- 

8.0 

.050 

No.  82.    G.  G.,  age, . 

June  10 

- 

15.1 

.105 

Bloody. 

June  17 

- 

12.2 

-..  .065 

June  23 

- 

11.0 

.115 

Sore  teat. 

July    3 

- 

11.0 

.075 

July    9 

- 

10.0 

.060 

July  21 

- 

8.5 

.085 

July  29 

- 

10.1 

.070 

Aug.    3 

- 

10.0 

.080 

Bloody. 

No.  84.    G.  A.,  age,  6  years, 
4  months. 

June  10 
June  19 

21 

22 

8.7 
6.7 

.075 
.040 

June  25 

23 

5.0 

.071 

July    3 

24 

6.1 

.080 

July  10 

25 

6.0 

.060 

No.  88.    G.  H.,  age,  5  years, 
6  months. 

June  11 
June  20 

31 
32 

8.0 
7.0 

.090 
.080 

June  30 

33 

6.0 

.030 

July     3 

34 

5.2 

.056 

July     8 

35 

4.5 

.046 

No.  93.    G.  H.,  age, . 

June  19 

5 

10.2 

.085 

June  30 

6 

9.3 

.027 

July  13 

8 

8.5 

.065 

July  21 

9 

11.2 

.055 

July  31 

11 

8.4 

.055 

Aug.    6 

12 

7.5 

.035 

No.  94.    G.  H.,  age,  10  years. 

June    9 

14 

19.3 

.145 

June  15 

15 

16.2 

.085 

June  23 

16 

16.0 

.085 

July     6 

18 

13.5 

.045 

July     9 

18 

13.5 

.050 

July  14 

19 

15.1 

.050 

CLAEIFICATION   OF   MILK. 


169 


Cow. 


Date. 


Weeks 
in  Lac- 
tation. 


Milk 
(Pounds). 


Slime 

(Per 

Cent.). 


Remarks. 


No.  91  —  Continued. 


No.  97.    G.  H.,  age,  10  years, 


No.  101.    R.  A.,  age,  5  years, 
6  months. 


No.  102.    G.  A.,  age,  10  years, 
2  months. 


No.  103.    R.  A.,  age,  11  years, 
4  months. 


No.  104,  R.  A.,  age  11  years,    . 


No.  105.    G.  J.,  age,  3  years, 
9  months. 


No.  106.    G.  H.,  age,  4  years. 


July  24 
July  29 
Aug.    6 

June  30 
July  3 
July  8 
July  20 

June  10 
June  18 
July  1 
July  7 
July  10 
July  21 
Aug.  3 
Aug.    8 

June  12 
June  26 
July  10 
July  23 
July  31 

July  18 
July  30 
Aug.   .3 

June    8 

June  12 
June  25 
July  1 
July  9 
July  21 
July  30 

June  19 
June  30 
July  21 
July  29 
Aug.    3 


18 
20 
21 
22 
24 
25 

12 
13 
16 
18 
18 


14.4 
11.6 
13.0 

12.0 
10.8 
10.4 
11.0 

10.2 
16.3 
13.8 
10.5 
14.0 
14.0 
10.0 
10.0 

20.8 
19.2 
18.8 
17.5 
17.5 

14.4 
14.8 
14.3 

8.5 

6.5 
7.5 

7.8 
7.4 
6.8 
7.5 

14.8 
14.4 
14.2 
12.6 
13.4 


.060 
.050 
.040 

.055 
.060 
.055 
.035 

.020 
.035 
.065 
.085 
.085 
.055 
.065 
.060 

.190 
.280 
.105 
,095 
.100 

.045 
.060 
.090 

.070 

.045 
.030 
.010 
.035 
.020 
.010 

.035 
.080 
.020 
.020 
.055 


Bloody. 


Bloody. 
Bloody. 
Bloody. 
Bloody. 
Bloody. 


Bloody. 


170         MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN   187. 


Cow. 

Date. 

Weeks 
in  Lac- 
tation. 

Milk 
(Pounds). 

Slime 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Remarks. 

No.  107.    G.  H.,  age,  3  years, 
8  months. 

June  15 
June  30 

18 
20 

9.2 
10.7 

.095 
.040 

July     3 

20 

10.5 

.060 

July     9 

21 

10.0 

.015 

Bloody. 

July  27 

24 

10.3 

.095 

Bloody. 

July  28 

24 

9.4 

.010 

Aug.    8 

25 

9.0 

.045 

No.  108.    R.  H.,  age,  3  years, 
10  months. 

June  17 
June  19 

27 
27 

14.5 
14.5 

.070 
.035 

June  24 

28 

13.5 

.060 

Bloody. 

July     1 

29 

13.5 

.055 

July     7 

30 

12.0 

.105 

Bloody,  quarter 
swoUen. 

July  14 

31 

12.3 

.015 

July  18 

31 

11.0 

.055 

July  27 

32 

11.0 

.055 

Aug.    1 

32 

11.5 

.045 

Aug.    6 

33 

11.2 

.055 

No.  110.    R.  H.,  age  5  years, 
4  months. 

June  17 
June  23 

33 
34 

12.3 
10.0 

.055 
.070 

July     1 

35 

10.2 

.045 

July     7 

36 

10.4 

.     .100 

July  27 

38 

11.8 

.055 

July  28 

39 

8.8 

.080 

Aug.    6 

40 

8.5 

.095 

Bloody. 

No.  111.    G.  H.,  age, . 

July  23 

- 

12.0 

.100 

Bloody. 

Aug.    3 

- 

9.0 

.085 

Bloody. 

No.  112 ,    G.  H.,  age,  3  years. 

July  13 

- 

8.8 

.055 

July   23 

- 

10.7 

.055 

July  29 

- 

10.0 

.080 

Aug.    8 

- 

10.5 

.050 

No.  113.    R.  J.,  age,  4  years, 
5  months. 

June  25 
June  26 

- 

5.0 
5.0 

.165 
.095 

First  milking. 

June  30 

1 

10.3 

.125 

Bloody. 

July     7 

2 

10.8 

.060 

Bloody. 

July  14 

3 

12.2 

.030 

July  27 

5 

12.4 

.040 

CLARIFICATION   OF   MILK. 


171 


Cow. 

Date. 

Weeks 
in  Lac- 
tation. 

Milk 
(Poimds). 

Slime 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Remarks. 

No.  113  — Coniinuffd. 

July  29 

' 

11.3 

.065 

July  30 

6 

10.8 

.125 

Bloody. 

No.  115.    G.  H.,  age, . 

July  13 

- 

10.3 

.020 

July  31 

- 

11.5 

.005 

Aug.    3 

- 

13.8 

.120 

Bloody. 

No.  116.    R.  H.,  age,  5  years. 

June  11 

100 

7.0 

.150 

June  15 

100 

7.6 

.052 

July  11 

103 

7.0 

.075 

July  19 

104 

7.8 

.075 

July  24 

106 

6.5 

.045 

July  29 

107 

6.0 

.090 

July  31 

107 

6.3 

.050 

Aug.  10 

108 

5.8 

.045 

No.  117.    G.  H.,  age,  3  years, 
11  months. 

June  12 
June  30 

33 
35 

11.3 
12.0 

.077 
.075 

Bloody. 

July  20 

38 

12.8 

.055 

July  31 

39 

13.6 

.040 

Aug.    6 

40 

11.7 

.060 

No.  118.    G.  J.,  age,  5  years,  . 

June  16 

30 

10.8 

.045 

June  26 

31 

10.3 

.030 

July     7 

33 

9.7 

.020 

July  23 

35 

7.2 

.035 

July  28 

36 

8.5 

.035 

No.  119.    G.  H.,  age,  5  years, 
2  months. 

June  15 
June  26 

35 
36 

9.8 
9.8 

.107 
.075 

Sore  teat. 

July  18 

39 

7.8 

.040 

July  19 

39 

7.5 

.060 

Aug.    1 

41 

6.8 

.080 

Aug.  10 

42 

6.2 

.055 

No.  120.    G.  G.,  age, . 

July  24 

- 

10.6 

.055 

Bloody. 

Aug.    1 

- 

10.1 

.090 

Aug.    8 

- 

13.1 

.070 

No.  125.    R.  H.,  age,  7  years, 
6  months. 

June  11 
June  16 

33 
33 

18.5 
19.0 

.127 
.235 

June  17 

33 

18.5 

.205 

172 


MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 


Cow. 

Date. 

Weeks 
in  Lac- 
tation. 

Milk 
(Pounds). 

Slime 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Remarks. 

No.  125  — Continued. 

June  18 

34 

19.0 

.155 

No   trouble   found   at 
any   time   with   this 

June  19 

34 

18.0 

.147 

cow. 

' 

June  20 

34 

20.0 

.155 

June  24 

35 

17.9 

.185 

July     1 

36 

16.4 

.185 

July    8 

37 

14.7 

.235 

July  13 

37 

12.9 

.100 

July  22 

39 

15.3 

.120 

No.  127.    G.  S.,  age, . 

June  12 

43 

13.5 

.110 

Bloody. 

June  19 

44 

13.1 

.065 

June  30 

45 

12.5 

.065 

July    3 

46 

12.5 

.090 

July  13 

47 

12.4 

.115 

July  18 

48 

12.0 

.105 

July  21 

48 

12.0 

.070 

July  29 

49 

12.5 

.080 

Aug.  10 

50 

12.0 

.055 

No.  130.    G.  H.,  age,  4  years, 
2  months. 

June  18 
June  25 

25 
26 

14.8 
13.2 

.077 
.055 

July     1 

27 

12.2   ' 

.065 

July     6 

27 

10.8 

.100 

July  13 

28 

11.0 

.125 

Bloody,  udder  swollen. 

July  23 

29 

11.3 

.085 

July  28 

30 

11.5 

.090 

No.  131.    G.  H.,  age, . 

June  26 

- 

14.5 

.115 

Bloody,  sore  teat. 

July     7 

- 

16.5 

.070 

July  22 

- 

15.6 

.060 

July  30 

- 

12.0 

.060 

No.  133.    G.  A.,  age,  4  years, 
3  months. 

June  11 
June  16 

15 
15 

15.0 
14.5 

.027 
.060 

June  23 

17 

11.3 

.055 

July     7 

18 

12.1 

.060 

July  21 

20 

11.0 

.095 

Bloody. 

July  29 

21 

11.5 

.046 

Aug.    6 

22 

10.8 

.030 

Bloody. 

CLARIFICATION   OF   MILK. 


173 


Cow. 

Date. 

Weeks 
in  Lac- 
tation. 

Milk 
(Pounds). 

Slime 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Remarks. 

No.  134.    R.  A.,  age,  3  years, 
11  months. 

June  15 
June  20 

•  55 
55 

6.5 
6.5 

.080 
.035 

June  24 

56 

5.0 

.060 

No.  135.    G.  H.,  age, . 

July  24 

- 

7.5 

.090 

July  28 

- 

8.4 

.130 

Cow  sick. 

Aug.    8 

- 

11.0 

.095 

Bloody. 

No.  136.    G.  H.,  age, . 

July  23 

- 

9.2 

.140 

Aug.    6 

- 

14.2 

.070 

No.  141.    G.  A.,  age,  2  years, 
10  months. 

June  12 
June  18 

20 
21 

9.8 
9.8 

.095 
.075 

June  24 

22 

9.6 

.015 

July     8 

23 

8.5 

.0,55 

July     9 

23 

8.6 

.045 

July   13 

24 

7.0 

.025 

July  27 

26 

7.6 

.035 

July  29 

26 

8.6 

.045 

Aug.  10 

27 

8.8 

.055 

No.  143.    G.  H.,  age,  3  years, 
10  months. 

June  12 
June  15 

8 
8 

9.4 

8.7 

.075 
.075 

Bloody. 

June  26 

10 

7.5 

.105 

July     9 

12 

6.5 

.010 

July   11 

12 

5.8 

.070 

Aug.  10 

12 

6.5 

.050 

No.  144.    R.  A.,  age,  3  years, 
6  months. 

June  10 
June  17 

35 
36 

9.6 
9.7 

.105 
.020 

Bloody. 

July     6 

38 

8.8 

.020 

July     8 

38 

7.6 

.045 

July  13 

39 

8.5 

.080 

July  29 

41 

7.6 

.035 

Aug.  10 

42 

8.1 

.055 

No.  147.    G.  A.,  age,  3  years, 
9  months. 

June  20 
June  23 

40 
40 

5.8 

.040 
.050 

July     3 

42 

5.0 

.076 

Bloody. 

July     8 

42 

5.0 

.085 

July  22 

44 

3.8 

.105 

174 


MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN   187. 


Cow. 

Date. 

Weeks 
in  Lac- 
tation. 

Milk 
(Pounds). 

Slime 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Remarks. 

No.  m— Continued. 

July  27 

45 

2.8 

.030 

July  31 

45 

4.3 

.090 

Two  milkings. 

No.  148.    R.  A.,  age,  2  years, 
10  months. 

June    8 
June    9 

28 
28 

10.0 
10.0 

.072 
.080 

Very    bloody,     udder 
bruised. 

June  10 

28 

10.0 

.085 

Bloody. 

June  20 

29 

9.5 

.045 

June  24 

30 

9.4 

.095 

Bloody. 

July     3 

31 

7.5 

.070 

July  23 

34 

5.9 

.045 

July  31 

35 

4.9 

.075 

Aug.    3 

35 

5.3 

.035 

No.  149.    R.  A.,  age,  2  years, 
11  months. 

June  19 
June  23 

25 
25 

8.2 
7.6 

.052 
.050 

July     6 

27 

6.9 

.055 

July  14 

28 

5.6 

.055 

July  20 

29 

7.2 

.025 

Aug.    1 

30 

6.1 

.050 

Aug.    6 

31 

6.5 

.015 

Aug.    8 

31 

6.5 

.030 

Blood 

No.  150.    R.  G.,  age,  3  years, 
4  months. 

June  18 
June  25 

38 
39 

8.0 
7.3 

.080 
.070 

July     6 

40 

7.0 

.055 

July   18 

42 

6.0 

.030 

July  22 

42 

6.2 

.060 

July  28 

43 

6.0 

.060 

No.  152.    R.  H.,  age,  2  years, 
8  months. 

June    9 

20 

11.5 

.080 

Bloody. 

June  24 

22 

9.8 

.027 

July     6 

24 

8.8 

.010 

July     9 

24 

9.0 

.055 

July  20 

26 

9.7 

.050 

July  24 

26 

9.3 

.080 

Bloody. 

July  30 

27 

9.2 

.050 

Aug.    3 

27 

10.4 

.020 

No.  153.    G.  A.,  age,  3  years, 
4  months. 

June    6 
June  18 

28 
29 

14.1 
11.4 

.057 
.070 

June  26 

30 

11.8 

.085 

CLAEIFICATION   OF   MILK. 


175 


Cow. 

Date. 

Weeks 
in  Lac- 
tation. 

Milk 
(Pounds). 

Slime 
(Per 
Cent.) 

Remarks. 

No.  153  — Continued. 

July     3 

31 

11.3 

.075 

July    8 

32 

10.4 

.020 

July  21 

34 

11.0 

.010 

July  30 

35 

9.8 

.025 

No.  81.    R.  A.,  age,  5  years, 
1  month. 

June  12 

58 

2.5 

.106 

No.  154.    R.  G.,  age,  2  years, 
9  months. 

June  11 
July     6 

15 

18 

8.0 

7.8 

.085 
.040 

Bloody. 

July     9 

19 

7.6 

.040 

July   23 

21 

7.0 

.045 

July  30 

22 

7.0 

.055 

Aug.    3 

22 

6.0 

.070 

No.  "B."    G.  G.,  age, . 

Jime  10 

- 

8.4 

.095 

June  19 

- 

10.6 

.012 

July     3 

- 

9.0 

.045 

July  14 

- 

9.0 

.045 

July  22 
July  31 

- 

9.5 
8.6 

.105 
.015 

Bloody,    swollen 
der. 

ud- 

Aug.  10 

8.0 

.080 

Bloody. 

No.  "B."    G.  G.,  age, •  . 

June  10 

- 

9.3 

.042 

June  18 

- 

11.5 

.040 

June  25 

- 

11.1 

.015 

Bloody. 

July     7 

- 

10.9 

.050 

July  21 

- 

10.5 

.060 

Aug.    1 

- 

10.0 

.015 

No.  28 

Aug.    6 

- 

19.1 

.065 

Aug.    8 

- 

17.9 

.055 

Fresh  milking. 

From  the  figures  in  the  preceding  table  conclusions  may  be  drawn  which 
will  more  or  less  summarize  the  results.  It  was  found  difficult  to  take  figures 
for  illustrations  which  were  not  influenced  by  some  factor  other  than  that 
under  discussion. 

1.  Different  individuals  vary  greatly  in  the  amount  of  slime  given,  even 
when  apparently  perfectly  normal  conditions  exist.  The  following  averages 
of  individuals  illustrate  this :  — 

Per  Cent. 

No.  125,         .  .  .' 168 

No.  107 .051 

No.  115 048 

No.    64, 139 


176 


MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 


2.  The  individuals  vary  greatly  in  the  amount  of  slime  given  at  different 
milkings;  in  successive  tests  No.  107  gave  .095,  .04,  .015  and  .095  per  cent. 
No.  26  varied  even  more,  from  .095  to  .01  per  cent. 

3.  A  few  cows  seem  to  be  fairly  constant  in  the  amount  of  sUme.  Nos.  125 
and  118  illustrate  this  very  clearly. 

4.  The  amoimt  of  sUme  is  affected  by  sore  teats  and  diseased  or  bruised 
udder.  No.  "B"  averages  .056  per  cent,  for  two  successive  tests,  the  follow- 
ing test  she  gave  .105  per  cent.  On  inquiry  of  the  milker  it  was  found  that 
the  cow's  udder  was  bruised.     Nos.  48,  75,  76,  108,  also  illustrate  this. 

5.  It  cannot  be  said  that  large  amounts  of  sUme  indicate  sore  or  diseased 
udder.  No.  125  in  eleven  tests  never  gave  less  than  .1  per  cent.,  and  no 
trouble  could  be  found.  Nos.  16  and  94  both  gave  very  high  tests,  but  without 
apparent  cause. 

6.  The  presence  of  blood  in  the  sUme  cannot  be  said  to  indicate  a  diseased 
udder  in  so  far -as  close  examination  would  reveal.  Bloody  sUme  is  not  con- 
fined to  cows  giving  high  amounts  of  sUme. 

7.  The  period  of  lactation  does  have  an  influence.  Cows  just  freshened 
give  a  high  per  cent,  of  shme;  it  is  often  continued  for  several  weeks.  In 
late  lactation  the  tendency  seems  to  be  to  give  a  high  per  cent.,  yet  this  does 
not  always  hold  good.  Many  of  the  tests  given  in  the  table  show  that  cows 
which  have  been  milking  for  a  long  period  give  very  small  amoimts  of  slime. 

8.  The  relation  between  amount  of  milk  secreted  and  sUme  is  in  no  way 
clear;  it  is  doubtful  if  there  is  any  such  relation. 

The  Determinations  of  this  Laboratory. — To  Lieutenant  Da  vies'  data  may 
be  advantageously  added  further  determinations  of  slime  from  different 
breeds  and  individual  cows,  together  with  a  few  determinations  made  upon 
cormnercial  milk  from  different  sources.  One  of  the  significant  things 
which  comes  to  light  in  these  determinations,  which  were  made  incidental 
to  other  work,  is  the  tendency  to  remain  more  or  less  constant  over  succes- 
sive days.    This  does  not  appear  in  Lieutenant  Davies'  work. 

Table  IV.  —  Amount  of  Slime  from  Different  Breeds. 

Certified  Milk. 

[Five  pounds  of  milk  used.] 


Cow. 


Breed 


Condition. 


Slime  (Dry  Weight  in  Grams). 


53 

77 
78 
72 
85 

100 
30 

127 


Jersey, 

Jersey, 

Guernsey, 

Guernsey, 

Ayrshire, 

Ayrshire, 

Holstein, 

Shorthorn, 


Normal,  . 
Normal,    . 

Abnormal, 
Normal,  . 
Normal,  . 
Normal,  . 
Abnormal, 


.2041 

.1732 

.26931 

.2590' 

.3387' 

.2588 

.2646 

.3650 

.2435' 

.2800' 

.2882 

.3710 

.2928 

.3266 

- 

3.8232 

1.2086' 

.5963' 

.4917' 

.5055' 

.5984 

.4342" 

.4567' 

.5058' 

.4974' 

.6171 

.7494' 

.7207' 

.9793' 

.6715' 

.2492 

.2506 

.3390 

,  .3111 

.3462 

.2020 

1.7008 

1.1392 

1.0180 

1.1713' 

.2140' 


1.3065' 


1  Weights  made  on  successive  days. 


CLARIFICATION   OF   MILK. 


177 


Table  IV.  —  Amount  of  Slime  from  Different  Breeds  —  Concluded. 

Commercial  Milk} 
[Ten  pounds  of  milk  used.] 


Slime  (Dry  Weight  in  Grams). 


Cole,  . 

Adams, 
Farm, 


1 . 14080 
.80275 
.84500 


1.1881 
.7946 
.8305 


1.2210 
.8231 
.9834 


1.0141 


1 . 1385 


1.1423 


From  the  above  study  it  will  be  gathered  that  the  amount  of  slime  from 
cows  of  the  same  breed  and  different  breeds  is  subject  to  great  variation, 
but  the  daily  production  from  a  cow  or  from  a  herd,  when  determined  on 
successive  days,  appears  to  be  quite  uniform. 

Effect  of  Temperature  upon  the  Amount  of  Slime. 
The  temperature  of  the  milk  at  the  time  of  clarifying  exerts  some  in- 
fluence upon  the  amount,  as  is  illustrated  in  the  accompanying  tables. 
The  cause  of  this  is  not  patent  unless  it  may  be  due  to  the  coalescence  of 
colloidal  particles,  thus  diminishing  the  extent  of  surface  of  the  combined 
particles  and  increasing  the  effect  of  the  centrifugalizing  forces. 

Table  V.  —  Effect  of  Temperature  on  Amount  of  Slime  Removed. 

[Twenty  pounds  of  commercial  milk  used  in  each  test.] 


Sample. 

Temperature 
(Degrees  F.). 

Slime  (Grams, 
Dry  Weight, 
in  Duplicate). 

I,       . 

55 

1.9812 
1.9474 

75 

,      1.9664 
1.9353 

100 

1.9888 

- 

1.9800 

n,   . 

• 

55 

2.0181 
2.1736 

75 

2.3984 
2.4226 

100 

2.6228 
2.5358 

Ill,  . 

55 
75 

1  1897 

1.3322 

95 

1.5948 

IV,  . 

55 

1.2342 
1.2679 

75 

1.3168 
1.3786 

95 

1 . 1244 
1.2300 

V,     . 

55 

.9631 

75 

1.0524 

95 

1.4778 

*  "Commercial"  and  "market"  as  applied  to  milk  are  used  interchangeably,  meaning  the 
ordinary  milk  that  is  sold. 


178         MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 


Table  V.  —  Effect  of  Temperature  on  Amount  of  Slime  Removed  —  Con- 
cluded. 


Sample. 


Temperatiire 
(Degrees  F.). 


Slime  (Grams, 
Dry  Weight, 
in  Duplicate). 


VI, 


VII, 


VIII, 


IX, 


X, 


1.4493 
1.7300 
1.6632 
1.6493 

.4210 
.3735 
.4485 
.5093 
.6140 
.5840 

1.0643 
1.0433 
1.0366 
1.1601 
1.3069 
1.3357 

.9360 

.9282 

1.0009 

.9667 

1.0092 

1.0050 

.9849 
1.0345 
1.0545 
1.1404 
1.1468 
1.2180 


Table  VI.  —  Effect  of  Higher  Temperatures  on  Amount  of  Slime  Removed 
{Commercial  Milk). 


Sample. 

90°  F. 

110"  F. 

125°  F. 

140°  F. 

Held 

90°  F.  for 

Three 

Hours. 

I 

II 

.9097 
1.0545 

1.1783 
1.2691 

1.3367 
1.3358 

1.6268 
1.6804 

1.1385 
1.1423 

Influence  of  Time  and  Acidity  upon  the  Amount  of  Slime. 
That  the  elements  of  time  and  acidity  operate  with  temperature  became 
evident  as  the  work  proceeded.    It  is  illustrated  in  the  table  below. 


CLARIFICATION    OF   MILK. 


179 


Table  VII.  —  Effect  of  Time  and  Temperature  on  Amount  of  Slime 

Removed. 

[A  single  sample  of  commercial  milk  was  used  in  this  test.] 


Time. 


Temperature 
(Degrees  F.). 


Grams  (Moist 
Weight). 


At  once, 
24  hours, 
48  hours. 

At  once, 
24  hours, 
48  hours, 
72  hours, 
90  hours. 

At  once, 
24  hours, 
48  hours, 
72  hours. 


1.1015 
1.1219 
1.2715 

1.3034 
1.2732 
1.0384 
1.3680 
1.93301 

1.2085 
1.4677 
1.6412 
1.9322 


1  High  acidity. 

Discussion.  —  It  is  readily  deducible  from  the  above  evidence  that  the 
amount  of  shme  differs  widely  when  secured  from  the  milk  of  the  same 
cow,  from  milk  of  different  individual  cows,  and  from  mixed  milks,  whether 
the  mixed  milks  have  the  same  origin  or  not.  It  is  also  manifest  from  the 
work  of  this  laboratory  that  samples  from  the  same  milk  when  clarified 
under  the  same  conditions  yield  practically  the  same  amount  of  slime. 
It  follows,  therefore,  that  the  causes  for  these  variations  must  be  found  in 
the  condition  of  the  animal,  the  conditions  which  surround  the  manipula- 
tion of  the  milk,  and  the  conditions  w^hich  are  involved  in  the  clarification. 

From  Lieutenant  Davies'  investigations  it  seems  clear  that  with  the 
beginning  of  the  period  of  lactation  there  is  a  great  increase  of  slime. 
This  may  be  attributable  to  the  colostral  milk  in  which  colostral  cells  are 
numerous.  Evidence  also  seems  to  point  directly  to  inflammatory  con- 
ditions of  the  udder  as  a  cause  of  increase;  garget  and  other  products  of 
inflammation  and  germ  action  within  the  udder  are  common,  probably 
much  more  so  than  is  usually  recognized.  As  high  as  20  per  cent.'  has 
been  given  as  the  average  appearance  of  garget  in  milch  cows.  This  does 
not  seem  unreasonable  when  one  reflects  on  the  sensitive  nature  of  the 
mammary  gland,  and  the  injuries  to  udders  so  frequently  encountered  by 
milkers,  giving  rise  to  restricted  or  general  mastitis.  Doubtless  the 
variability  in  cell-content  must  influence  the  amount  of  slime  to  a  con- 
siderable extent.  This  may  or  may  not  be  associated  with  inflammatory 
processes.  The  so-called  fibrin  may  be  a  variable  quantity.  These  are 
matters  which  we  shall  treat  in  greater  detail  later. 

Whether  milk  is  dirty  or  clean,  whether  many  micro-organisms  are 
present  or  not,  whether  it  is  fresh  from  the  cow  or  has  stood  for  some  time, 
whether  it  has  been  held  at  a  low  or  high  temperature,  are  all  in  some  way 
related  to  the  variation  in  the  amount  of  slime  obtained. 

Again,  the  clarifier  itself  and  the  manner  of  manipulation  have  a  de- 


«  Ernst,  W.:  Milk  Hygiene,  translated  by  Mohler  and  Eichorn,  p.  85. 


180         MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 

cided  influence  upon  the  slime  produced.  Whether  the  machine  is  run 
at  high  speed  or  low  speed,  whether  the  temperature  of  the  milk  is  high  or 
low,  whether  the  machine  has  passed  quantities  of  milk  or  only  a  small 
amount,  whether  it  is  one  size  or  another  and  whether  it  is  one  make  or 
another,  —  all  exert  a  modif  jang  influence  on  the  amount  of  slime  thrown 
out. 

If,  for  instance,  the  amount  removed  when  it  is  greater  in  one  case  than 
in  another  is  to  the  credit  and  efiiciency  of  the  machine,  wiU  depend  on 
whether  the  material  so  removed  is  dirt  or  some  normal  content,  as 
leucocytes.  However,  it  would  seem  that  in  the  light  of  the  primary 
purpose  of  a  clarifier  the  greater  the  amount  of  slime  removed  the  better. 
This  will  have  to  be  passed  over,  however,  for  it  has  not  been  the  object 
of  the  writers  to  test  the  efficiency  of  clarifiers  of  different  manufacturers, 
or  even  the  different  makes  of  a  single  manufacturer.  This  has  been 
studiously  avoided. 

Food  Value  of  Slime, 

The  average  amount  of  slime  estimated  in  terms  of  the  entire  milk  is  less 
than  five  one-hundredths  of  1  per  cent.  This  weight  includes  foreign 
elements,  as  dirt,  hairs  and  such  other  materials  as  are  likely  to  find  their 
way  into  the  milk.  Only  the  normal  elements,  as  the  so-caUed  leucocytes, 
the  so-called  fibrin,  fat  and  casein,  can  in  any  sense  be  regarded  as  possess- 
ing food  value.  Inasmuch  as  the  3|  per  cent,  of  fat  and  the  3  per  cent, 
of  casein  existing  in  slime  (see  analyses  below)  represent  only  3^  and  3  per 
cent,  of  five  one-hundredths  per  cent,  of  the  milk,  in  other  words,  .00175 
and  .0015  per  cent,  of  the  milk,  the  conclusion  of  analysts,  that  the 
food  value  of  slime  is  neghgible,  is  warranted.  There  is  interest  attached, 
however,  to  the  seeming  fact  that  the  protein  not  only  comes  from 
the  casein  that  is  thrown  out,  as  suggested  by  Mclnerney,  but  that  it 
takes  the  form  of  purin  bodies,  too,  as  suggested  by  North.  The  fat  also 
appears  not  only  to  be  the  fat  of  milk  but,  as  Bahlman  states,  the  fat  of 
epithelial  cells  and  other  detritus.  Evidently  the  cellular  elements  fur- 
nish a  recognizable  source  of  some  of  the  material  or  substances  found  in 
the  slime;  hence,  when  taken  together  with  the  large  number  of  corpus- 
cular elements  eliminated  in  the  slime  which  will  be  shown  later,  they 
cannot  be  overlooked  in  the  interpretation  of  milk  clarification.  This 
raises  a  question  at  once,  which,  so  far  as  the  authors  are  aware,  has  not 
been  answered:  Do  these  cellular  elements  in  any  manner  contain  a  con- 
stituent or  constituents  which  contribute  to  nutrition?  The  work  of' 
McCoUum  and  Davis, ^  McCoUum,  Simmonds  and  Pitz,^  Osborne  and 
Mendel,^  Hopkins  and  Neville,*  and  others  suggests  the  possibihty  that 

1  McCollum,  E.  v.,  and  Davis,  M.:  The  Nature  of  Dietary  Deficiencies  of  Rice.  Journal  of 
Biol.  Chem.,  1915,  Vol.  XXIII.,  p.  181. 

2  McCollum,  E.  v.,  Simmonds,  E.  V.,  and  Pitz,  W.:  The  Relation  of  the  Unidentified  Dietary 
Factors,  the  Fat-soluble  A  and  Water-soluble  B,  of  the  Diet  to  the  Growth-promoting  Properties 
of  Milk.    Jour,  of  Biol.  Chem.,  1916,  Vol.  XXVII.,  No.  1,  p.  33. 

3  Osborne,  T.  B.,  and  Mendel,  L.  B.:  Milk  as  a  Source  of  Water-soluble  Vitamine.  Jour,  of 
Biol.  Chem.,  1918,  Vol.  XXXIV.,  No.  3,  p.  537. 

«  Hopkins,  F.  G.,  and  Neville,  A.:  A  Note  concerning  the  Influence  of  Diets  upon  Growth. 
Biochem.  Jour.,  1913.  Vol.  VII.,  p.  97. 


CLARIFICATION    OF   MILK. 


181 


in  these  corpuscular  elements  there  may  exist  what  may  be  called  nutri- 
tional activators,  or  bodies  which  in  very  small  quantities  are  essential  to 
body  maintenance. 

Chemical  Analyses  of  Clarifier  Slime. 
Analysis  by  Bahbnan.  * 


Protein  (nitrogen  x  6.38) , 

Fat.     . 

Milk  sugar, 

Crude  fiber, 

Silica, 

Oxide  of  iron. 

Oxide  of  alumina, 

Calcium  phosphate, 

Potassiunl  phosphate. 

Sodium  and  potassium  chloride. 


Per  Cent. 

67.9 

3.4 

7.8 

2.2 

3.8 

.5 

.6 

3.6 

6.2 

.1 


Undetermined, 


96.1 
3.9 


100.0 


Analysis  by  Mclnerney.  * 


ExPERIME^fT. 

Fat  (Per 
Cent.). 

Water 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Total 

Solids 

(Per 

Cent.). 

Ash  (Per 
Cent.). 

Nitro- 
gen (Per 
Cent.). 

Casein 

(Per 
Cent.). 

1, 

2, 
3. 
4, 
6, 
6, 
7, 
8, 

4.0 
5.0 
3.4 
3.2 
4.0 
5.0 
3.7 
4.0 

70.13 
71.86 
70.04 
69.92 
75.50 
71.01 
71.35 
70.87 

29.87 
28.14 
29.96 
30.08 
24.50 
28.99 
28.65 
29.13 

4.17 
2.73 
3.81 
3.00 
2.74 
3.36 
2.59 
2.83 

.43 
.23 
.71 
.14 
.31 
.10 
.49 
.27 

2.74 
1.46 
4.52 

.89 
1.97 

.63 
3.12 
1.72 

A^ 

revag 

B| 

4.0 

71.33 

28.67 

3.15 

.33 

2.13 

Analysis  by  North. ' 


Per  Cent. 
Total  solids,     ..............       30 

Fat,         .  .  .       ' .3 

Ash,        ...............'  3 

Nitrogenous  organic  compounds,  ..........       24 


»  Bahlman,  Clarence:  Milk  Clarifiers.  Am.  Jour.  Pub.  Health,  1916,  Vol.  VI,  No.  8, 
pp.  855,  856. 

»  Mclnerney,  T.  J.:  Clarification  of  Milk,  Cornell  University  Agricultural  Experiment  Station. 
Bulletin  No.  389,  AprU,  1917,  p.  499. 

»  North,  Charles  E.:  The  Creamery  and  Milk  Plant  Monthly,  Vol.  II,  No.  1,  p.  19. 


182 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 


We  may  conclude  for  the  present,  at  least,  that  the  slime  cast  out  by  the 
clarifier  has  no  nutritional  significance,  for  in  amount  it  is  negligible  and 
in  quality  value  there  exist  no  definite  data. 

This  laboratory  has  concerned  itself  with  some  determinations  of  fat  in 
sUme  to  ascertain  whether  breed  or  amount  of  slime  affected  the  per  cent, 
of  fat  present.  No  relation  can  be  seen  by  the  authors.  The  following 
tables  will  contribute  information  which  makes  this  conclusion  reason- 
able: — 


Table  VIII.  —  Determination  of  Fat  in  Slime  from  Different  Breeds. 


Cow. 

Breed. 

Weight 

of 
Slime 
(Dry). 

Per 
Cent. 

of 
Fat. 

Weight 

of 
Slime 
(Dry). 

Per 

Cent. 

of 

Fat. 

Weight 

of 
Slime 
(Dry). 

Per 

Cent. 

of 

Fat. 

Weight 

of 
Slime 
(Dry). 

Per 

Cent. 

of 

Fat. 

53 

Jersey,   . 

.2041 

4.3 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

77 

Jersey,    . 

.2588 

6.5 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

78 

Guernsey, 

'    . 

.2928 

5.0 

.3939 

4.9 

- 

- 

- 

- 

72 

Guernsey, 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

85 

Ayrshire, 

.5984 

3.9 

.4342 

3.8 

.4567 

3.9 

.5058 

3.8 

100 

Ayrshire, 

.7494 

3.5 

.7207 

3.6 

.9793 

3.6 

- 

- 

30 

Holstein, 

.3390 

3.5 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

127 

Shorthorn, 

1.7008 

3.5 

1.1713 

3.6 

1.3065 

3.5 

- 

- 

Likewise  no  relation  can  be  established  between  total  solids  of  the  cow's 
milk  and  the  slime  produced. 


Table  IX.  —  Determination   of   Total  Solids    in   Slime  from   Different 

Cows. 


Cow  127. 

Cow  72. 

Cow  100. 

Cow  85. 

Cow  53. 

Weight 

of 
Slime 
(Dry). 

Per 

Cent. 

of 
Solids. 

Weight 

of 
Slime 
(Dry). 

Per 

Cent. 

of 
Solids. 

Weight 

of 
Slime 
(Dry). 

Per 
Cent. 

of 
Solids. 

Weight 

of 
Slime 
(Dry). 

Per 
Cent. 

of 
Solids. 

Weight 

of 
Slime 
(Dry). 

Per 

Cent. 

of 
Solids. 

1.1713 

12.22 

.2472 

12.75 

.7207 

12.20 

.4567 

12.31 

.2693 

12.55 

1.3065 

11 

97 

.2740 

12.50 

.9793 

11.78 

.5058 

12.42 

.2590 

12.90 

1.1940 

11 

80 

.2245 

12.08 

.6715 

11.60 

.4974 

12.45 

- 

- 

1.0472 

11 

51 

.2317 

12.45 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

.8930 

11 

85 

.2962 

12.49 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

1.6843 

11 

86 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

1.3548 

11 

90 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

CLARIFICATION   OF   MILK. 


183 


The  same  holds  true  when  these  determinations  are  followed  over 
several  successive  daj^s.  Possibly  the  differences  are  so  small  that  they 
do  not  become  sufficiently  evident  against  the  fluctuations  in  the  amount 
of  slime  eliminated.  - 

Table  X,  —  Determination  of  Total  Solids  in  Slime  over  Successive  Days 


Thurs- 
day. 

Fri- 
day. 

Satur- 
day. 

Sun- 
day. 

Mon- 
day. 

Tues- 
day. 

Betty  III:  — 
Forenoon,     . 

Afternoon,    . 

Red  IV:  — 
,  Forenoon,     . 

Afternoon,    . 

Weight  of  slime  (dry), 
Per  cent,  of  solids, 
Weight  of  slime  (dry), 
Per  cent,  of  solids,     . 

Weight  of  slime  (dry). 
Per  cent,  of  solids. 
Weight  of  slime  (dry), 
Per  cent,  of  solids,     . 

.1440 
14.6400 

.4385 

.1289 
12.1290 

.1043 
13.7300 

.4607 
14.0900 

.4970 
14.4900 

.2064 
13.2800 

.1551 
13.0800 

.4452 

13.9500 

.4205 

.0941 
12.9900 

.1127 
13.6600 

.4418 
13.5700 

.4113 
13.5000 

.1127 
12.9800 

13.7300 

.1082 
12.7800 

.4455 
14.0200 

Leucocttes  (so-called)  in  Slime. 

That  the  clarifier  throws  out  of  the  milk  a  large  proportion  of  the  so- 
called  leucocytes  is  the  testimony  from  various  sources.  The  number 
eliminated,  moreover,  is  usually  determined  by  the  examination  of  milk' 
before  and  after  clarification.  It  is  desirable,  therefore,  to  treat  this 
particular  subject  more  fully  in  connection  with  other  corpuscular  ele- 
ments under  the  discussion  of  mUk.  Determinations,  however,  which 
have  been  made  from  slime  directly  are  quite  Umited  because  of  the  great 
possibility  of  error  and  the  difficulties  involved,  but  are  helpful  in  arriving 
at  a  knowledge  of  the  clarifier  situation.  Hammer  ^  has  estimated  as 
many  as  830,000,000  to  1,120,000,000  per  cubic  centimeter  of  moist  slime. 

The  estimates  of  this  laboratory  are  based  on  certified  and  market  milk 
and  upon  individual  cow's  nulk.  The  authors  do  not  deem  this  method  as 
accurate  as  the  determination  of  leucocytes  in  milk  before  and  after 
clarification.  This  attempt  at  determination  does  indicate  forcibly  that 
the  cellular  elements  of  milk  make  up  a  no  mean  portion  of  the  total  slime 
eliminated. 

1  Hammer,  B.  W.:  Agricultural  Experiment  Station,  Iowa  State  College  of  Agriculture  and 
Mechanic  Arts.    Research  Bulletin  No.  28,  January,  1916. 


184         MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 


Table  XI. 

—  Leucocytes  'per  Gram  in  Slime  from 

Certified  Milk. 

Sample. 

Cow. 

Number 
per  Gram. 

Sample. 

Cow. 

Number 
per  Gram. 

1,      .        .        .        . 

33 

104,000,000 

14,      . 

56 

90,000,000 

2, 

77 

19,500,000 

15, 

77 

- 

3, 

33 

72,800,000 

16, 

24 

20,000,000 

4, 

77 

62,400,000 

17, 

33 

420,000,000 

5, 

77 

20,500,000 

18, 

62 

670,000,000 

6, 

146 

30,900,000 

19, 

146 

200,000,000 

7, 

33 

40,000,000 

20, 

77 

330,000,000 

8, 

77 

32,000,000 

21, 

56 

442,000,000 

9. 

33 

28,000,000 

22, 

24 

390,000,000 

10, 

77 

24,500,000 

23, 

62 

80,000,000 

11, 

33 

70,000,000 

24, 

62  and  33 

300,000,000 

12, 

62 

- 

25, 

62  and  33 

600,000,000 

13, 

146 

3,000,000 

Note.  —  The  slime  was  macerated  in  a  definite  quantity  of  physiological  solution  and  the 
cells  determined  in  the  suspension.  All  cells,  however,  are  not  released  from  the  slime  by  this 
method. 


Table  XII.  —  Leucocytes  per  Gram  in  Slime  from  Commercial  Milk. 


Sample. 


Number 
per  Gram. 


300,000,000 
400,000,000 
200,000,000 


Savplb. 


Number 
per  Gram. 


350,000,000 
270,000,000 
420,000,000 


Note.  —  This  slime  was  treated  in  the  same  manner  as  in  the  case  of  certified  milk. 

Further  discussion  of  this  subject  will  be  deferred  to  the  discussion  of 
corpuscular  elements  of  milk,  on  page  196. 


The  Fibkin  (so-called)  in  Slime: 

The  constituent  of  milk  which  has  been  designated  as  fibrin  because  it 
responds  to  the  methods  of  staining  fibrin  is  approximately  completely 
removed,  as  wiU  be  gathered  from  the  tables  given  later  (see  page  202). 


CLARIFICATION    OF   MILK. 


185 


Table  XIII.  —  Presence  of  Fibrin  in 

Slimes  from 

Certified  Milk. 

Sample. 

Cow. 

Fibrin. 

Sample. 

Cow. 

Fibrin. 

1 

33 

*+ 

14 

56 

+        , 

2. 

77 

+ 

15, 

77 

+ 

3, 

33 

+ 

16. 

24 

+ 

4, 

77 

+ 

17, 

33 

+ 

5, 

77 

+ 

18, 

62 

+ 

6, 

146 

+ 

19, 

146 

+ 

7, 

33 

+ 

20, 

77 

+ 

8, 

77 

+ 

21, 

56 

+ 

9, 

33 

+ 

22, 

24 

+ 

10, 

77 

+ 

23, 

" 

62 

+ 

11. 

33 

+ 

24, 

33  and  62 

+ 

12, 

62 

+ 

25, 

33  and  62 

+ 

13, 

146 

+ 

The  Dirt  in  Slime. 

By  dirt  is  meant  those  extraneous  substances  which  find  their  way  into 
milk  from  without,  or  after  the  milk  has  left  the  udder.  All  milks,  whether 
certified  or  ordinary  market  milk,  contain  some  dirt.  It  appears,  however, 
in  different  quantities  in  different  milks,  and  the  amount  present  in  a  gen- 
eral way  corresponds  closely  to  the  grade  of  the  milk. 

An  analysis  of  the  dirt  found  in  or  gaining  entrance  to  milk  has  resulted 
in  the  recognition  of  definite  substances  associated  with  the  cow,  stable, 
milker  or  utensils.  Some  of  the  materials  are  feces,  dust,  hairs,  straw, 
hay,  epithelial  cells,  —  in  short  any  loose  material  on  the  cow  or  easily 
detached  from  the  cow,  the  milker,  the  stall;  substances  floating  in  the 
air  as  the  result  of  stirring  hay  or  bedding  or  any  dusty  articles  in  the 
stable;  material  adherent  to  the  pail;  and  other  foreign  matter  reaching 
the  milk  through  flies,  straining,  etc. 

In  this  particular  connection  our  interests  center  in  what  the  clarifier 
may  do  toward  undoing  what  has  been  done  in  milking  and  handling  milk. 
During  the  process  of  milking,  as  a  rule,  the  dirt  is  added;  then  an  effort 
is  made  to  remove  it  by  straining  and  render  it  harmless  by  pasteuriza- 
tion. The  clarifier  is  now  added  as  a  means  to  assist  in  the  removal  of 
dirt. 

It  is  evident  that  the  clarifier  as  a  centrifuge  cannot  remove  that  portion 
of  the  dirt  which  goes  into  solution.  No  centrifuge  can  do  this  as  long  as 
the  solution  diffuses  throughout  the  whole  mass;  accordingly,  this  should 
not  be  charged  against  the  machine,  because  it  is  beyond  the  reach  of 
any  present  practical  device,  mechanical  or  otherwise. 


186         MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 

Table  XIV.  —  Does  an  Increase  in  Dirt  Mean  an  Increase  in  Bacteria 
in  Clarified  Milk  and  Water? 

1.  Determine  by  adding  definite  quantities  of  dirt  to  water,  and  esti- 
mate number  of  bacteria  per  cubic  centimeter  before  and  after  clarifica- 
tion. 


Bacteria  per  Cubic 
Centimeter. 

Before. 

After. 

Sample  I,  .5000  gram  in  1  liter, 

Sample  II,  .5000  gram  in  1  liter, 

Sample  III,  .2000  gram  in  I  liter 

Sample  IV,  .1000  gram  in  I  liter, 

30,000 
40,000 
30,000 
10,000 

40,000 
50,000 

20,000 
10,000 

2.  Determine  by  adding  similar  quantities  of  dirt  to  milk,  estimating 
the  number  of  bacteria  per  cubic  centimeter  before  and  after  clarification. 

Adding  .5000  Gram  of  Dirt  to  Milk   Containing    100,000,000  Bacteria  per  Cubic 

Centimeter. 


Bacteria  per  Cubic 
Centimeter. 

Before. 

After. 

Sample  I,     .        .         .                 

Sample  II, 

160,000,000 
225,000,000 

75,000,000 
175,000,000 

Adding  .2000  Gram   of  Dirt   to  Milk    Containing   15,000,000    Bacteria   per  Cubic 

Centimeter. 


Sample  III, 


50,000,000 


8,000,000 


Adding  .1000   Gram   of  Dirt   to   Milk   Containing   22,000,000   Bacteria-  per  Cubic 

Centimeter. 


Sample  IV, 


40,000,000  30,000,000 


A  determination  of  the  solubility  of  dirt  was  undertaken  to  set  before 
the  reader  just  the  nature  of  the  dirt  problem.  The  first  series  of  deter- 
minations was  made  by  placing  a  combination  of  dry  manure,  curryings 
and  dust  of  definite  weight,  which  might  get  into  milk  easily,  into  water 
as  a  menstruum,  then  the  suspension  and  solution  were  filtered  or  clarified. 
Later,  milk  was  employed  as  a  menstruum  in  place  of  water. 


CLAEIFICATION    OF   MILK.  187 

Table  XV.  — •  Determinations  of  Solubility  of  Dirt..    InsohMe  Dirt  Re- 
moved by  Filtration. 

No.  1.  Grams. 

Weight  of  dirt  added  to  500  cubic  centimeters  of  water,    .......  1049 

Weight  of  dirt  recovered,        ...........     .0889 

Weight  of  dirt  entering  solution,      ..........      .0160 

Per  cent,  of  soluble  dirt,  16. 

No.  2. 
Weight  of  dirt  added  to  500  cubic  centimeters  of  water,    .......  1000 

Weight  of  dirt  recovered,        ...........      .0798 

Weight  of  dirt  entering  solution,      ..........      .0202 

Per  cent,  of  soluble  dirt,  20. 

No.  3. 
Weight  of  dirt  added  to  500  cubic  centimeters  of  water,    ......     .2031 

Weight  of  dirt  recovered,        ............  1700 

Weight  of  dirt  entering  solution,      ..........      .3310 

Per  cent,  of  soluble  dirt,  12. 

Table  XVI.  —  Determinations  of  Solubility  of  Dirt.    Insoluble  Dirt  Re- 
moved by  Clarification. 

No.  1.  Grams. 

Dirt  added  in  1 ,000  cubic  centimeters  of  water,  ........  5000 

Dirt  recovered  from  clarifier,  ..........      .4210 

Dirt  lost  as  soluble,        ............     .0786 

Per  cent,  entering  solution,  15. 

No.  2. 
Dirt  added  in  1,000  cubic  centimeters  of  water,        .......     .5000 

Dirt  recovered  from  clarifier,  ..........     .4210 

Dirt  lost  as  soluble 0786 

Per  cent,  entering  solution,  16. 

Dry  manure  is  evidently  more  soluble  than  the  dirt  used  in  the  preced- 
ing tests. 

Table  XVII.  —  Determinations  of  the  Solubility  of  Dry  Manure  in  Water. 

No.  1.  Grams. 

Manure  (dry)  added  to  1,000  cubic  centimeters  of  water,  .  .  .  .  .     .2000 

Manure  recovered,         .............  1535 

Manure  entering  solution,       ...........     .0465 

Per  cent,  of  solubility,  23.3. 

No.  2. 
Manure  (dry)  added  to  1,000  cubic  centimeters  of  water,  .....     .2000 

Manure  recovered,  .............  1520 

Manure  entering  solution,       ...........     .0480 

Per  cent,  of  solubility,  24. 

No.  3. 
Manure  (dry)  added  to  1,000  cubic  centimeters  of  water,  .....     .2000 

Manure  recovered,         .............  1501 

Manure  entering  solution,       ...........     .0499 

Per  cent,  of  solubility,  24.5. 


188         MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN   187. 

An  attempt  to  add  dirt  to  certified  milk  and  recover  or  determine  it 
after  passing  the  clarifier  was  undertaken  by  the  method  of  differences. 
This,  however,  is  subject  to  the  error  in  clarifying  the  same  sample  of  milk 
in  two  lots;  the  possibility  of  such  error  can  be  ascertained  by  consulting 
page  160.  Even  though  the  same  conditions  are  observed  throughout  as 
considered  previously,  except  the  addition  of  dirt,  the  error  resulting  in 
clarification  is  real,  and  the  method  of  differences  here  used  cannot  be 
accepted  as  absolute.  So  difficult  is  it  to  extract  dirt  from  slime  and  weigh 
it  that  the  results  must  be  considered  as  indicative  only. 

If,  for  instance,  an  addition  of  a  solvent  to  the  slime  for  releasing  the 
dirt  is  made,  the  solution  of  the  dirt  is  increased.  When  1  per  cent,  of 
KOH  is  added  to  dry  manure  the  per  cent,  of  solution  goes  to  28.5,  32.5 
and  32,  instead  of  24  and  24.5,  as  in  the  case  of  water. 

To  illustrate  the  results  obtained  by  the  addition  of  about  .2000  to 
.5000  gram  of  dirt  to  one  liter  of  milk,  the  following  determinations  are 
given :  — 

Table  XVIII.  —  Solvbility  of  Dirt  in  Milk. 

No.  1.'  Grams. 

Slime  from  1  liter  of  normal  milk,           .          .          .          .          .          .          .          .          .  2 .  2504 

Slime  from  1  liter  of  normal  milk  +  .5000  gram  dirt 2.9123 

Difference  representing  dirt  recovered,  .........  .6619 

No.  2. 

Slime  from  1  liter  of  normal  milk,           .          .          .          .          .          .          .          .          .  1 .  1276 

Slime  from  1  liter  of  normal  milk  +  .5044  gram  dirt,        ......  1.5519 

Difference  representing  dirt  recovered,  .........  .4243 

No.  3. 

Slime  from  1  liter  of  normal  milk,           .........  1.7432 

Slime  from  1  liter  of  normal  milk  +  .2000  gram  dirt,         ......  1.9340 

Difference  representing  dirt  recovered,  .          .          .          .          .           .          .          .          .  .  1908 

I  In  this  case  the  difference  represents  more  dirt  than  was  added. 

In  the  above  samples  the  certified  milk  or  normal  milk  represented  the 
minimum  amount  of  dirt  present  in  milk;  accordingly,  it  doubtless  had 
little  effect  on  the  results  obtained.  While  it  is  unjustifiable  to  say  that 
the  amounts  recovered  from  the  slime,  after  the  milk  has  had  added  a 
definite  amount  of  dirt  and  has  been  through  a  clarifier,  indicate  the  effi- 
ciency of  the  clarifier  in  removal  of  dirt,  it  is  justifiable  to  infer  that  a 
portion  of  the  insoluble  part  is  removed.  A  lack  of  exact  methods,  as 
heretofore  hinted,  by  which  dirt  is  separated  from  the  remainder  of  the 
slime  precludes  drawing  more  definite  conclusions  or  giving  more  satis- 
factory data. 

The  removal  of  dirt  has  been  approached  from  another  angle,  which  will 
help  in  understanding  the  nature  of  dirt  in  milk  in  its  relation  to  clarifica- 
tion. In  one  instance  5  pints  of  commercial  milk  were  passed  through 
the  Wisconsin  Sediment  Tester,  using  individual  discs  of  cotton  for  each 
pint.  The  milk  was  then  allowed  to  pass  directly  into  the  clarifier  receiv- 
ing can  and  clarified  immediately.  The  slime  eUminated  by  the  clarifica- 
tion was  tested  by  macerating  the  slime  and  centrif  uging.    Visible  amounts 


CLARIFICATION   OF   MILK. 


189 


of  dirt  were  present  in  the  bottom  of  the  tubes.  From  this  one  gathers 
that  the  clarifier  still  removes  dirt  after  the  milk  has  been  passed  through 
the  cotton  disc  of  the  Wisconsin  Cotton  Disc  or  Sediment  Tester. 

In  another  instance  this  trial  was  made  with  2  pints  of  commercial 
milk.  Dirt  was  recognized  after  submitting  the  milk  to  the  same  pro- 
cedures as  above.    Evidences  of  dirt  appeared  on  the  clarifier  bowl  also. 

A  little  different  form  of  experimentation  was  then  adopted  to  demon- 
strate the  efficiency  of  the  clarifier  in  removing  insoluble  dirt.  Definite 
quantities  of  milk  were  run  through  the  clarifier;  a  sample  of  clarified 
milk  was  taken  from  time  to  time,  centrifuged  and  examined  for  dirt. 
Table  XIX  gives  the  results  of  this  experiment. 


Table  XIX.  —  Efficiency  of  Clarifier  in  Eliminating  Dirt. 

[All  samples  of  milk  showed  presence  of  dirt  before  clarification.    Claimed  maximum  efficiency 

of  clarifier,  45  pounds.] 


Lot. 

Pounds  of 
MUk. 

Centrifuge    Test. 

I, 

10 

No  dirt  observable. 

20 

No  dirt  observable. 

30 

No  dirt  observable. 

40 

No  dirt  observable. 

50 

Slight  trace  observable. 

60 

Slight  trace  observable. 

70 

Slight  trace  observable. 

80 

More  dirt  observable. 

II, 

20 

No  dirt  observable. 

40 

No  dirt  observable. 

60 

Slight  trace  observable. 

80 

Slight  trace  observable. 

Ill 

20 

No  dirt  observable. 

40 

No  dirt  observable. 

60 

Slight  trace  observable. 

80 

Slight  trace  observable. 

IV.i 

10 

No  dirt  observable. 

20 

SUght  trace  observable. 

30 

Slight  trace  observable. 

40 

More  dirt  observable. 

50 

More  dirt  observable. 

60 

More  dirt  observable. 

70 

Original  dirt  observable. 

80 

Original  dirt  observable. 

1  Sawdust  was  present. 


190         MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 

It  is  legitimate  to  claim  that  the  cotton  disc  in  the  Wisconsin  Sediment 
Tester  is  as  good  a  strainer  as  is  employed,  but  it  is  not  wholly  efficient. 
The  clarifier  removes  insoluble  dirt  which  has  not  been  removed  by  the 
tester.  Again,  the  clarifier  removes  insoluble  dirt  to  such  an  extent  when 
running  within  its  prescribed  limitations  that  it  is  impossible  to  detect 
it  by  any  methods  used  by  the  investigators.  Of  course,  dirt  which  has 
gone  into  solution  is  beyond  reclamation.  It  is  doubtless  true  that  the 
clarifier  is  the  most  efficient  strainer  known  when  the  specific  gravity  of 
the  dirt  is  not  lighter  than  the  milk.  It  practically  removes  all  insoluble 
dirt. 

MiCRO-OKGANISMS  IN   SlIME.  ^ 

It  is  possible  to  study  the  number  of  micro-organisms  in  the  slime 
eliminated  from  milk  as  well  as  the  number  of  micro-organisms  before  and 
after  clarification.  It  would  be  better  to  use  the  slime  in  this  determina- 
tion were  it  feasible  to  release  the  micro-organisms  from  the  slime,  since 
in  the  determination  before  and  after  clarification  colonization  with  its 
difficulties  interferes  to  such  an  extent  as  to  vitiate  the  results. 

To  demonstrate  this  difficulty  in  the  release  of  micro-organisms  from 
slime,  and  at  the  same  time  to  indicate  the  micro-organisms  eliminated 
from  milk  which  do  not  reveal  themselves  in  the  counts  before  and  after 
clarification,  the  following  tables  are  introduced.  In  these  efforts  it  is 
doubtful  whether  50  per  cent,  have  been  made  available  for  counting. 


CLAEIFICATION    OF   MILK. 


191 


cq 


SJ 

^ 

^ 

-v 

^ 

CO 

■^ 

-^l 

■§ 

'r^ 

s 

&5 


^ 
^ 


m 

a 

o 

o 

1 

1 

0 

o 

o 

0 

O 

Ol 

CO 

> 

t 

« 

M 

<3 

a 

g 

Fm 

.2 

o 

§ 

1 

0 
0 

1 

o 

Oi 

■w 

M 

^ 

o 

Pm 

CQ 

CJ 

o 

o 

0 

1 

0 

.2 

o 

o 

t^ 

0 

o 

"5 

1— t 

(2 

00 

A. 

S 

<ii 

c;^ 

c3 

o 

o 

0 

0 

1 

o 

o 

o 

1(5 

0 

o 

lO 

01 

0 

'■g 

ci 

,-r 

^ 

o 

Pm 

fq 

0 

o 

o 

CS 

1 

0 

.o 

o 

o 

00 

<o 

o 

o 

00 

,_; 

^ 

•o 

■* 

T^ 

o 

H 

PW 

>:) 

;u 

S 

< 

02 

a 
.9 

o 

o 

0 

1 

o 

03 

0 

o 

o 

0 

0 

t^ 

"5 

TjT 

^ 

of 

o 

^ 

pq 

C3 

o 

o 

«3 

1 

0 

.9 

o 

o 

0 

o 

<M_ 

00 

QO 

w 

o 

of 

PL, 

CM 

^ 

-li 

0 

o 

o 

0 

o 

o 

o 

a> 

0 

o 

0 

't. 

N 

rt 

^ 

CO 

o 

PL( 

a 

3 

t^ 

© 

0 

T3 

c3       '-^ 

® 

a  1 
^    a 

.a 

0 

cS      -^ 

0 

1  i 
■3  .2 

2 

0 

1  1 

s 

0. 

•— <  u 

C3         0 

TJ 

"  1  3 

0 

a 

■s 

.9 

(^ 
1 

1 

1 

0  3  03 

td 

0 

£3 

'3 

^ 

^003 

a 

"3 

C8 

2 

^■s  ^ 

a 

2 

■3 

03 

Q.  13    "» 

0 

3 
0 

.S9& 

ill 

C3 

a 
0 

a 

;i3 

0 

"3 

a 

fl 

0  M  0 

0 

u 

8 

8 

0 

a'°a 

a 

3 

B 

"m 

25S 

.a  0 

s 

g 

^ 

'S 

0 

a 

0 

&: 

M 

192        MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN   187. 


o 
O 


oq 


s 

.^ 

(y^ 

s 

w 

? 

.§ 

a 

^ 

*s^ 

^ 

^ 


X 
X 
w 
n 


ca 

0 

0 

>o 

1 

0 

.2 

0 

00 

0 

0 

0 

^J1 

0 

■Sm 

0 

0 

• 

0 

>' 

.0 

0 

>o 

^- 

t~ 

S 

C3 

0 

0 

•^ 

0 

1 

0 

0 

0 

t^ 

0 

^ 

0 

0 

0 

CQ 

'■2<i 

0 

0 

^ 

0 

£ 

10 

0 

ta 

1^ 

0 

M 

'^ 

CT 

'"' 

§ 

0 

g 

S 

1 

0 
0 

0 

> 

§ 

§ 

.-i 

0 
■^ 

H 
•J 

M 

PL4 

a 

C3 

0 

0 

cq 

0 

1 

0 

f2 

0 

t^ 

to 

0 

0 
0 

o> 

0 
0 

0 

0 

00 

CM 

fl 

0 

0 

01 

1 

0 

0 

0 

0 

M* 

0 

0 

0 

e-1 

0 

1-J 

r 

0 

0 

' 

0 

0 

10 

l-l 

0 

M 

g 

N 

e<r 

"* 

a 
0 

0 

0 

OS 

0 

1 

s 

0 

0 

00 

0 

<! 

0 

0 

0 

K) 

r" 

<=> 

0 

0 

^ 

0 

0 

0 

<m" 

im" 

'^ 

1 

§ 

0 

0 

•* 

, 

0 

0 

0 

to 

0 

0 

0 

t>. 

0 

^ 

■Em' 

0 

s 

0 

» 

(S 

<z> 

C<J 

CO 

PL. 

3 

C3 

0 

0 

«o 

0 

1 

0 

0 

0 

00 

0 

<! 

0 

0 

o» 

0 

02 

'■S<i 

Q 

0 

10 

0 

<M 

t> 

(§ 

" 

13 

0 

0 

<M 

1 

0 

.2 

0 

e<3 

0 

0 

to 

0 

'■H« 

0 

0 

in 

0 

ea 

0 

to 

H 

(S 

"* 

<N 

^ 

&4 

s 

n 

0 

0 

>o 

0 

1 

0 

0 

0 

00 

0 

0 

0 

to 

0 

'■S< 

0 

0 

0 

0 

o> 

0 

0 

(2 

M 

0 

-.J 

a 

3 

M 

<0 

0 

"i  ^ 

0 

a  1 
■S   1 

a 
•43 

4) 

e3      t3 

W 

.2     0 

0 

3 

3     .S 

0 

1     -§ 

s 

0 

3 

«     S3 

•a 

^    3 

0 

c 

-M 

.0 

P" 

0  1^ 

03 

0 

•g,  1   0 
»2id  ^ 

■§ 

1 

U3 

■c 

.3 

§ 

1 
g 

C3 

«-^J=l 

M 

•3 
0 

a 
© 

a 

s 

g  §  ® 

13 

s 

a 
8 

8 

8 

0 

S'Sg 

g 

g 

fi 

i 

1     ^ 

fc 

fe 

■3 

a 

0 

0 

&: 

CLARIFICATION   OF   MILK. 


193 


Table  XXI.  —  Releasing  of  Micro-organisms  from  Slime. 

Certified  Milk. 
[One  liter  employed  for  each  sample.] 


Bacteria  per 

Cubic 

Centimeter 

in  Milk. 

Bacteria  per  Cubic  Centimeter  — 

Sample. 

In  First 
Suspension. 

In  Second 
Suspension. 

In  Third 
Suspension. 

Before  clarification 

10,000 

5.000 

500 

200 

After  clarification, 

10.000 

3,000 

200 

100 

Before  clarification, 

15,000 

4,000 

1,000 

100 

After  clarification, 

10,000 

1,000 

500 

100 

Before  clarification, 

2,500 

2.000 

1,500 

150 

After  clarification, 

2,300 

1.700 

500 

200 

Before  clarification. 

14.000 

4,200 

2,500 

_i 

After  clarification. 

12,000 

3,000 

1,000 

-I 

Before  clarification. 

4,000 

2,000 

500 

200 

After  clarification, 

6,000 

2,000 

300 

100 

Before  clarification, 

15,000 

1,500 

1,100 

300 

After  clarification. 

18,000 

1.000 

500 

200 

Before  clarification. 

500 

800 

400 

40 

After  clarification. 

600 

2,000 

300 

10 

'  Less  than  100. 


Commercial  Milk. 


Bacteria 
per  Cubic 
Cen- 
timeter 
in  Milk. 

Weight 

of 
Slime 
from 
Milk. 

First  Suspension. 

Second  Suspension. 

Sample. 

Bacteria 
per  Cubic 

Cen- 
timeter. 

Weight 

of 
Slime. 

Bacteria 
per  Cubic 

Cen- 
timeter. 

Weight 
Slime. 

Before  clarification,   . 
After  clarification,     . 

Before  clarification,  . 
After  clarification, 

Before  clarification,   . 
After  clarification,     . 

400,000 
350,000 

75,000 
50,000 

320,000 
280,000 

.9150 

i     .9910 

.8940 

40,000 
17,000 

20,000 
25,000 

75,000 
40,000 

•     .0300 

.0340 

1     .0450 

16,000 
1,000 

1,000 
6,000 

I     .0200 
.0130 

194 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 


Table  XX  points  out  that,  when  the  slime  is  built  up  to  the  same  amount 
as  the  original  milk  from  wliich  it  has  been  obtained  by  means  of  sterile 
physiological  salt  solution,  the  number  of  organisms  recovered  when 
agitated  may  be  even  more  than  in  the  original  determination  in  the  milk 
before  clarification.  It  further  shows  that  agitation  has  a  decided  effect 
in  releasing  the  micro-organisms  probably  from  both  the  slime  and  colonies, 
but,  on  the  other  hand,  it  doubtless  falls  very  much  short  in  its  purpose. 

Table  XXI  reveals  the  effect  of  repeated  maceration  and  agitation  upon 
the  releasing  of  micro-organisms  from  slime. 

Both  tables  seem  to  reveal  the  fact  that  estimates  made  from  milk  before 
and  after  clarification  have  little  value. 

To  bring  out  the  results  obtained  by  other  laboratories  and  by  this 
laboratory  in  efforts  to  count  organisms  in  sHme,  it  is  pertinent  to  insert 
the  following  tables,  but  these  should  be  interpreted  in  the  light  of  the 
preceding  attempts  to  release  the  micro-organisms.  No  other  conclusion 
can  be  drawn  from  these  figures  than  the  most  conspicuous  failure  to" 
determine  the  number  of  micro-organisms  in  slime,  and  yet  this  is  the 
most  reliable  approach  available  at  the  present  time.  The  values  secured 
by  repeated  macerations  and  suspensions  are  far  in  advance  of  any  other 
determinations  of  micro-organisms. 

Some  of  Hammer's  findings  are  as  follows:  — 


Table  XXII.  — 

Micro-organisms  Found  in  Slime  (Hammer). 

Pounds  of 

Milk 
Clarified. 

Slime 
(Cubic  Cen- 
timeter). 

Bacteria 
per  Cubic 

Centimeter 
of  Slime. 

Pounds  of 

Milk 
Clarified. 

Slime 
(Cubic  Cen- 
timeter). 

Bacteria 
per  Cubic 
Centimeter 

of  Slime. 

635 
837 
725 

1,150 
918 

1,169 

70 
125 
90 
70 
70 
45 

38,000,000 
830,000,000 
31,000,000 
1,445,000,000 
710,000,000 
790,000,000 

953 
1,249 
1,147 
1,356 
1,241 

65 
125 
250 
125 
100 

675,000,000 
860,000,000 
435,000,000 
278,000,000 
680,000,000 

CLARIFICATION   OF   MILK. 


195 


Table  XXIII.  —  An  Attempt  to  Estimate  the  Ntmiber  of  Bacteria  in  the 
Slime  Removed  from  Certified  Milk  as  Produced  by  Individual  Cows. 


Sample. 

Cow. 

Number  of 
Bacteria 

per  Gram 

of  Moist 

Slime. 

Sample. 

Cow. 

Number  of 
Bacteria 

per  Gram 

of  Moist 

Slime. 

1,      .        .        .        . 

33 

570,000 

20 

77 

650,000 

2. 

77 

300,000 

21, 

56 

290,000 

3, 

33 

30,000 

22, 

24 

110,000 

4, 

77 

20,000 

23, 

62 

145,000 

5, 

77 

430,000 

24, 

62  and  33 

17,000 

6, 

146 

68,000 

25, 

62  and  33 

550,000 

7, 

33 

50,000 

26, 

33 

360,000 

8. 

77 

33,000 

27, 

77 

200,000 

9, 

33 

90,000 

28, 

33 

152,000 

10, 

77 

52,000 

29, 

77 

300,000 

11, 

33 

50,000 

30, 

33 

100,000 

12, 

62 

- 

31, 

77 

150,000 

13, 

146 

45,000 

32. 

33 

100,000 

14, 

56 

540,000 

33, 

77 

500,000 

15, 

77 

- 

34, 

33 

200,000 

16, 

24 

220,000 

35, 

77 

100,000 

17, 

33 

60,000 

36, 

33 

570,000 

18, 

1          62 

110,000 

37, 

77 

300,000 

19. 

146 

580,000 

Table  XXIV.  • —  An  Attempt  to  Estimate  the  Number  of  Bacteria  in  the 
Slime  Removed  in  Market  Milk. 


Sampl?!. 


Number  of 

Bacteria 
per  Grain  of 
Moist  Slime. 


.  750,000,000 
15,000,000 
26,000,000 
25,000,000 
900,000 
60,000,000 
50,000,000 
6,000,000 


Sample. 


10, 
11, 
12, 
13, 
14, 
15, 


Number  of 

Bacteria 
per  Gram  of 
Moist  Slime. 


35,000,000 
1,500,000 
4,200,000 
4,500,000 
3,200,000 
2,800,000 
4,000,000 


196 


MASS.-  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187 


The  results  of  counting  the  micro-organisms  in  sHme  are  therefore  un- 
satisfactory, yet  it  is  evident  that  very  large  numbers  are  imbedded  in  it, 
sufficient  at  times,  so  far  as  the  tables  are  concerned,  to  overthrow  the 
counts  obtained  in  milk  before  and  after  clarification.  It  is  only  through 
the  study  of  the  micro-organisms  in  slime,  and  the  suspension  of  specific 
organisms  which  will  be  given  later,  that  any  adequate  notion  of  what 
occurs  in  this  respect  is  obtained. 

For  purposes  of  illustrating  the  operation  of  the  clarifier  in  the  action 
on  micro-organisms,  the  following  table  is  furnished.  Other  than  this 
little  significance  is  to  be  given  to  results  shown. 

Table  XXV.  —  Bacteria  per  Gram  of  Moist  Slime  in  the  Three  Seeming 

Layers. 


Sample  VI. 


Sample  IX. 


Sample  XII. 


Bottom 


Middle 


Top 


(Direct, 
Plate, 
f  Direct, 
I  Plate, 
f  Direct, 
1  Plate, 


30,000,000 
1,500,000 

30,000,000 
1,100,000 

30,000,000 
7,000,000 


350,000,000 
200,000,000 
450,000,000 
200,000,000 
600,000,000 
160,000,000 


50,000,000 
24,000,000 
45,000,000 
12,000,000 
42,000,000 
118,000,000 


III.    MILK. 

When  milk  is  subjected  to  clarification  slime  is  removed.  What  com- 
poses slime  and  what  its  significance  is  has  been  considered  in  the  forego- 
ing discussion.  Apparently  the  nutritional  value  of  milk  has  not  been 
materially  altered  so  far  as  can  be  determined  at  present;  corpuscular 
elements  have  been  removed,  suspended  dirt  has  been  eliminated,  micro- 
organisms have  been  thrown  out  in  large  numbers.  These,  however, 
have  been  determined  through  the  slime.  It  now  remains  to  study  the 
modifications  of  milk  itself,  including,  as  it  does  under  natural  circum- 
stances, all  of  these  elements. 

Corpuscular  Elements  op  Milk. 

The  so-called  leucocytes  are  very  greatly  reduced  in  numbers  by  clari- 
fication. This  will  be  established  bj'-  attached  data.  Whether  this  re- 
moval has  any  particular  meaning  per  se  other  than  demonstrating  the 
efficiency  of  the  clarifier  under  normal  or  abnormal  conditions  cannot  be 
stated  positively  in  the  light  of  our  present  knowledge.  However,  the  large 
numbers  present  in  inflammatory  processes  of  the  udder  have  a  significance 
from  the  standpoint  of  toxic  products  and  pathogenic  micro-organisms, 
and  accordingly  may  be  considered  objectionable.  The  thought,  too, 
of  enormous  numbers  existing  in  milk  due  to  inflammation,  whether 
local  or  general,  is  reprehensible  in  the  same  way  that  visible  dirt  affects 
the  value.    Nevertheless,  in  normal  milk  large  numbers  are  found,  but 


CLAEIFICATION   OF   MILK. 


197 


whether  they  possess  any  inherent  qualities  as  food  value  or  other 
significance  cannot  at  the  present  time  be  satisfactorily  interpreted. 

The  removal  of  leucocytes  or  other  corpuscular  elements,  as  colostral 
cells,  from  milk  bears  directly  upon  the  interpretation  of  the  efficiency  of 
clarification,  in  that  such  products  as  garget,  etc.,  are  removed,  and, 
further,  a  measure  is  established. 

The  determinations  made  by  the  Biochemical  Laboratory  of  Boston, 
quoted  by  Parker,^  by  Hammer, ^  and  by  this  laboratory,  are  therefore 
appended  to  illustrate  the  above  views. 


Table  XXVI. — Effect  of  Clarifying  Milk  on  Cell  Counts  {Boston  Biochem- 
ical Laboratory). 

Machine  A  working  at  6,000  Revolutions  per  Minute. 


Date. 

Minutes 
Elapsed 

after 
Starting 
the  Run. 

Tempera- 
ture 
of  Milk  at 
Sampling 

(De- 
grees F.). 

Average 

Number  of 

Cells  per 

Field  in 

Unclarified 

Milk. 

Average 
Number  of 
Cells  per 
Field  in 
Clarified 
Milk. 

May  14,  1915 

5 

80 

17.0 

9.0 

25 

80 

12.0 

8.0 

35 

85 

17.0 

4.0 

45 

72 

17.0 

4  0 

47 

74 

- 

13.0 

May  18,  1915, 

20 

80 

4.0 

2.2 

50 

82 

4.3 

2.3 

65 

78 

13.0 

3.4 

75 

78 

8.0 

2.4 

85 

83 

6.3 

1.2 

120 

75 

3.2 

2.3 

May  19,  1915 

20 

76 

13.6 

6.0 

50 

74 

6.8 

5.4 

60 

106 

8.0 

4.0 

115 

96 

7.0 

5.0 

May  20,  1915 

20 

98 

7.0 

4.0 

50 

74 

6.7 

4.3 

80 

80" 

27.6 

10.5 

90 

88 

20.2 

12.6 

100 

78 

18.2 

12.0 

110 

72 

19.0 

5.0 

115 

78 

17.0 

1.0 

1  Parker,  H.  N.:  The  City  Milk  Supply,  1917,  pp.  257,  258. 

2  Hammer,  B.  W.:   Agricultural  Experiment  Station,  Iowa  State  College  of  Agriculture  and 
Mechanical  Arts.    Research  Bulletin  No.  28. 


198         MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 


Table  XXVI.  —  Effect  of  Clarifying  Milk  on  Cell  Counts  —  Concluded. 

Machine  B  working  at  5,400  Revolutions  per  Minute. 


Date. 

Minutes 
Elapsed 

after 
Starting 
the  Run. 

Tempera- 
ture 
of  Milk  at 
Sampling 

grees  F.). 

Average 

Number  of 

Cells  per 

Field  in 

Unclarified 

Milk. 

Average 
Number  of 
Cells  per 
Field  in 
Clarified 
Milk. 

May  14,  1915, 

5 

78 

11,0 

3.0 

25 

79 

82.0 

2.0 

35 

85 

9.0 

5.0 

45 

84 

9.0 

1.0 

May  17,  1915 

20 

94 

8.0 

6.0 

60 

88 

11.0 

9.0 

75 

92 

17.0 

5.0 

80 

88 

4.0 

4.0 

85 

88 

4.0 

2.0 

90 

90 

24.0 

4.0 

May  19,  1915 

20 

92 

5.7 

1.1 

50 

88 

7.2 

3.8 

60 

90 

6.8 

3.0 

65 

94 

5.6 

2.2 

May  21,  1915 

20 

86 

14.5 

14.0 

50 

74 

14.0 

13.0 

70 

78 

13.0 

11.0 

85 

80 

14.7 

11.8 

95 

80 

19.0 

17.0 

105 

72 

22.0 

19.0  , 

CLARIFICATION    OF   MILK. 


199 


Table  XXVII.  —  Cells  per  Cubic  Centimeter  before  and  after  Clarification 

{Hammer) . 


Temperature  of  Milk. 


Number  of 

Cells  per 

Cubic 

Centimeter 

before 
Clarification. 


Number  of 

Cells  per 

Cubic 

Centimeter 

after 
Clarification. 


Per  Cent. 

of  Cells 

thrown  out. 


58, 

56, 
68, 
55, 
46, 
43, 
41, 
51, 
44, 
54, 
54, 
50, 
61, 
43, 
60, 
46, 
48. 
^48, 
48, 
68. 
67, 
64, 
60, 
54, 
60, 
66, 
59, 
52, 
59, 
73, 
70, 


266,000 
120,000 
441,000 
572,000 
407,000 
390,000 
171,000 
258,000 
276,000 
376,000 
177,000 
293,000 
448,000 
303,000 
426,000 
276,000 
156,000 
208,000 
832,000 
198,000 
484,000 
610,000 
282,000 
405,000 
216,000 
442,000 
209,000 
301,000 
281,000 
367,000 
182,000 
209,000 
184,000 
230,000 


206,000 

52,000 
290,000 
259,000 
227,000 
247,000 

93,000 
116,000 
220,000 
193,000 

95,000 
265,000 
140,000 
197,000 
274,000 
202,000 

93,000 
159,000 
226,000 

90,000 
378,000 
489,000 
152,000 
145,000 
186,000 
244,000 
158,000 
203,000 
216,000 
302,000 
169,000 
110,000 
102,000 
135,000 


23 
57 
34 
55 
44 
37 
46 
55 
20 
49 
46 
10 
69 
35 
36 
27 
40 
24 
73 
55 
22 
20 
46 
64 
14 
45 
24 
33 
23 
18 
7 
47 
45 
41 


200         MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 


Table  XXMI.  —  Cells  per  Cubic  Centimeter  before  and  after  Clarification 
(Hammer)  —  Concluded. 


Temperature  of  Milk. 


Number  of 

Cells  per 

Cubic 

Centimeter 

before 
Clarification. 


Number  of 

Cells  per 

Cubic 

Centimeter 

after 
Clarification. 


Per  Cent. 

of  Cells 

thrown  out. 


159,000 
324,000 
205,000 
308,000 
258,000 
218,000 
287,000 
267,000 
146,000 
196,000 
216,000 
288,000 
253,000 
220,000 
194,000 
120,000 
393.000 
421,000 


73,000 
173,000 

95,000 
157,000 
129,000 
112,000 
206,000 
184,000 

61,000 
131,000 

89,000 
•149,000 
132,000 
140,000 
140,000 

95,000 
212,000 
316,000 


Average, 


297,481 


177,442 


54 
47 
54 
49 
50 
49 
28 
31 
58 
33 
59 
48 
48 
36 
28 
21 
46 
25 


39 


Table  XXVIII.  —  Leucocytes  per  Cubic  Centimeter  in  Certified  Milk  be- 
fore and  after  Clarification. 


Sample  No.                                Cow. 

Before. 

After. 

Per  Cent. 
Reduction. 

1 

33 

455,000 

65,000 

85 

2 

77 

26,000 

11,000 

58 

3 

33 

494,000 

56,000 

88 

4 

77 

440,000 

234,000 

46 

5 

77 

208,000 

30,000 

85 

6 

146 

117,000 

13,000 

88 

7 

33 

182,000 

19,000 

89 

8 

77 

141,000 

11,000 

92 

9 

33 

174,000 

23,000 

86 

CLARIFICATION   OF   MILK. 


201 


Table  XX^'III.  —  Leucocytes  per  Cubic  Centimeter  in  Certified  Milk  before 
and  after  Clarification  —  Concluded. 


Sample  No. 


Cow. 


Before. 


After. 


Per  Cent. 
Reduction. 


10, 
11, 
12, 
13, 
14, 
15, 
16, 
17, 
18. 
19, 
20, 
21, 
22, 
23, 
24, 
25, 


77 

33 

62 
146 

56 

77 

24 

33 

62 
146 

77 

56 

24 

62 
62  and  33 
62  and  33 


163,000 

260,000 

150,000" 

81,000 

340,000 

31,000 

97,000 

520,000 

80,000 

55,000 

21,000 

364,000 

260,000 

200,000 

370,000 

200,000 


21,000 
21,000 
13,000 
17,000 
35,000 
13,000 
17,000 
190,000 
26,000 
13,000 
7,000 
39,000 
26,000 
25,000 
52,000 
20,000 


Table  XXIX.  —  Leucocytes  per  Cubic  Centimeter  in  Commercial  Milk 
before  and  after  Clarification. 


Sample  No. 


Before. 


After. 


Per  Cent. 
Reduction. 


1, 
2, 
3, 

4, 
5, 
6, 


250,000 
230,000 
130,000 
200,000 
290,000 
400,000 


65,000 
30,000 
12,000 
20,000 
50,000 
30,000 


The  tables  furnish  an  understanding  of  the  leucocytic  situation  in 
clarification.  If  nothing  else  is  to  be  attributed  to  the  ejection  of  cellular 
elements,  it  can  be  safely  said  that  the  clarifier  does  perform  its  function 
very  satisfactorily  in  removing  normal  corpuscular  elements,  and,  farther, 
should  there  be  accumulations  or  aggregations  due  to  inflammatory 
conditions,  it  doubtless  eliminates  every  particle  of  this  heavier  suspended 
mass,  inasmuch  as  the  surface  is  reduced  and  its  power  to  remain  sus- 
pended long  in  the  milk  destroyed.    What  is  gained  by  this  act  is  to  be 


202 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 


estimated  by  the  general  understanding  that,  so  far  as  possible,  all  traces 
of  inflammatory  products  should  be  removed  from  milk.  This  is  to  be 
done  whether  any  tangible  reason  can  be  given  or  not  at  present;  it  is 
the  consensus  of  opinion  that  at  times,  at  least,  these  products  are  dan- 
gerous, especially  the  micro-organisms  giving  rise  to  them. 

The  Fibrin  (so-called)  in  Milk. 

A  substance  which  has  been  designated  as  fibrin  is  visible  in  milk  when 
treated  with  a  fibrin  staining  process.  This  is  ahnost  invariably  removed 
by  clarification.  It  cannot  be  our  purpose  to  assign  to  this  particular 
substance  any  role  other  than  existence,  in  accordance  with  results  of 
staining.  That  such  results  are  obtainable  can  be  best  verified  by  actual 
trial. 


Table  XXX.  —  Presence  of  Fibrin  in  Certified  Milk  hejwe  and  after 

Clarification. 


Sample  No. 


Cow. 


Before. 


After. 


1, 

2. 

3. 

4, 

5. 

6, 

7, 

8, 

9. 

10, 

11, 

12, 

13, 

14, 

15, 

16, 

17, 

18, 

19, 

20, 

21, 

22, 

23, 

24, 

25. 


33 

77 
33 
77 
77 
146 
33 


33 

62 
146 

56 

77 

24       ■ 

33 

62 
146 

56 

24 

62 
33  and  62 
33  and  62 


CLAEIFICATION   OF   MILK. 


203 


Table  XXXI.  —  Presence  of  Fibrin  in  Covimercial  Milk  before  and  after 

Clarification. 


Sample  No. 

Before. 

After. 

Sample  No. 

Before. 

After. 

1, 

+ 

— 

4, 

— 

— 

2, 

+ 

+ 

5, 

- 

— 

3, 

— 

— 

6, 

+ 

- 

MiCRO-OEGANISMS   IN   MiLK. 

This  particular  aspect  of  the  work  seems  to  be  the  most  popular  for 
testing  the  efficiency  of  the  clarifier,  and  yet  it  has  a  faulty  basis  which  is 
not  always  considered  in  conclusions.  Microbial  counts  may  tell  a  very 
misleading  falsehood  unless  the  full  story  is  told  and  the  conditions  are 
fully  understood. 

Several  contributions  have  been  made  upon  the  removal  or  non-removal 
of  bacteria  by  the  clarifier.  Dr.  J.  Arthur  McClintock  ^  divided  clarifiers 
into  three  types,  — A,  B  and  C. 

Out  of  26  tests  made  with  type  A,  he  obtained  a  reduction  of  29.7  to 
55.1  per  cent. 

Out  of  22  tests  made  with  type  B,  he  obtained  a  reduction  of  — 3.5  to 

29.8  per  cent.    Only  two  instances  of  increase  occurred  among  the  22 
tests.    These  account  for  the  — 3.5  per  cent. 

Out  of  12  tests  made  with  type  C,  he  obtained  a  reduction  of  — 631  to 

35.9  per  cent.    Only  in  one  instance  among  these  12  tests  did  he  have  an 
increase,  which  alone  accounts  for  the  — 631  per  cent. 

These  results  are  so  different  from  those  which  follow  that  the  reviewer 
hesitates  to  accept  them  without  further  data,  and  does  not  feel  at  liberty 
to  accord  with  the  deductions  from  his  study  of  the  different  types  of 
clarifiers.  There  must  be  influences  at  work  which  the  writer  failed  to 
record. 

There  may  be  gleaned  an  astounding  statement  from  A.  J.  Hinkelmann,- 
in  which  he  says:  "I  have  found  that  the  pathogenic  bacteria  commonly 
met  with  are  precipitated  much  more  readily  than  are  the  non-pathogenic." 
Such  selective  power  on  the  part  of  the  clarifier  almost  bespeaks  super- 
human capacity.  It  also  indicates  that  if  an  organism  is  pathogenic 
(which,  of  course,  has  onlj;-  restricted  application,  depending  upon  species 
of  animal  affected  and  other  conditions)  it  possesses  a  distinctive  specific 
gravity.  This  scarcely  seems  credible,  although  it  can  be  understood 
that  some  organisms  are  heavier  than  others.     The  division,  however, 

1  McClintock,  J.  Arthur:  An  Investigation  of  Clarification  of  Milk.  The  Milk  Trade  Journal, 
1916,  Vol.  IV,  No.  6,  p.  10. 

-  Hinkelmann,  A.  J.:  Micro-organic  Weight.  Reprint  from  the  Illinois  Medical  Journal, 
issue  of  March,  191G. 


204 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 


can  scarcely  be  made  from  pathogenesis  alone,  if  present  knowledge  has 
any  weight.  More  may  be  said  concerning  this  later,  in  connection  with 
some  evidence  which  the  authors  may  wish  to  furnish. 

A  table  furnished   by  W.  A.  Stocking^  illustrates  results  commonly 
obtained  with  commercial  milk. 


Table  XXXII.  —  Effect  of  a  Centrifugal  Clarijier  xipon  the  Germ-content 
of  Milk  (Stocking). 


Bacteria 
Sample  No.                               before 

Clarifying. 

Bacteria 

after 

Clarifying. 

Numerical 
Increase. 

Per  Cent. 
Increase. 

1, 

2, 

3, 

4, 

5, 

6,000 

15,000 

60,000 

133,000 

370,000 

9,000 

22,000 

156,000 

197,000 

643,000 

3,000 

7,000 

96,000 

64,000 

273,000 

50 
46 
160 

48 
73 

The  seemingly  universal  increase  given  bj^  Stocking  is  not  borne  out 
by  other  workers  who  furnish  extended  studies.  The  explanation  for 
this  may  be  found  in  the  character  of  the  milk  used. 

Parker  quotes  the  findings  of  the  Biochemical  Laboratory  of  Boston.- 

1  Marshall,  C.  E.:  Microbiology,  1917,  p.  390. 

2  Parker,  H.  N.:  The  City  Milk  Supply,  pp.  257,  258. 


CLARIFICATION    OF    MILK. 


205 


Table  XXXIII.  —  Effect  of   Clarifying  Milk  on  the   Bacterial    Count 
{Biochemical  Laboratory). 

Machine  A,  working  at  0,000  Revolutions  per  Minute. 


Date. 

Bacteria 

per  Cubic 

Centimeter 

in  Un- 

clarified 

Milk. 

Bacteria 

per  Cubic 

Centimeter 

in 

Clarified 

Milk. 

Numerical 
Increase. ' 

Per  Cent. 
Increase. ' 

May  14,1915 

1,700,000 

1,900,000 

200,000 

12 

1,250,000 

920,000 

—330,000 

-26 

950,000 

1,500,000 

550,000 

58 

780,000 

1,200,000 

420,000 

54 

- 

1,330,000 

- 

- 

Average 

1,170,000 

1,370,000 

200,000 

17 

May  18,  1915 

360,000 

360,000 

0 

0 

710,000 

880,000 

170,000 

24 

950,000 

960,000 

10,000 

1 

800,000 

980,000 

180,000 

23 

750,000 

850,000 

100,000 

13 

900,000 

1,080,000 

180,000 

20 

Average 

745,0002 

851,6662 

76,666 

10 

May  19,  1915 

1,350,000 

1,220,000 

—130,000 

—9 

1,600.000 

1,300,000 

—300,000 

—19 

850,000 

420,000 

—430,000 

-50 

950,000 

500,000 

-^50,000 

—47 

Average, 

1,187,5002 

860,000 

—327,500 

—27 

May  20,  1915, 

410,000 

270,000 

—140,000 

—34 

230,000 

190,000 

-40,000 

—17 

600,000 

580,000 

—20,000 

—3 

860,000 

1,000,000 

140,000 

16 

660,000 

500,000 

—160,000 

—24 

650,000 

700,000 

50,000 

7 

750,000 

610,000 

—140,000 

—18 

Average, 

594,285 

550,000 

—44,285 

—7 

'  This  column  added  by  the  authors. 


2  Corrected  from  table. 


206         MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN   187. 


Table  XXXIY.  —  Effect  of  Clarifying  Milk  on  the  Bacterial  Count  (Bio- 
chemical Laboratory). 

Machine  B,  working  at  6,400  Revolutions  per  Minute. 


Date. 

Bacteria 

per  Cubic 

Centimeter 

in  Un- 

clarified 

Milk. 

Bacteria 

per  Cubic 

Centimeter 

in 

Clarified 

Milk. 

Numerical 
Increaae. ' 

Per  Cent. 
Increase. ' 

May  14,  1915, 

1,100,000 

650,000 

—450,000 

—40 

1,030,000 

820,000 

—210,000 

—20 

600,000 

1,010,000 

410,000 

68 

450,000 

900,000 

450,000 

100 

Average 

795,0002 

845,000 

50,000 

6 

May  17,  1915, 

1,070,000 

580,000 

—490,000 

—45 

780,000 

980,000 

200,000 

25 

800,000 

950,000 

150,000 

19 

1,150,000 

780,000 

—370,000 

-32 

850,000 

750,000 

-100,000 

-12 

900.000 

1,400,000 

500,000 

55 

Average, 

925,000 

906,666 

—18,334 

—2 

May  19,  1915 

900,000 

800.000 

—100,000 

-11 

1,110,000 

910,000 

—200,000 

—18 

780,000 

660,000 

—120,000 

—15 

870,000 

930,000 

60,000 

7 

Average, 

915,000 

825,000 

—90,000 

—10 

May  21,  1915 

200,000 

180,000 

—20,000 

—10 

90,000 

130,000 

40,000 

44 

280,000 

240.000 

—40,000 

—14 

130,000 

170,000 

40,000 

30 

550,000 

750,000 

200,000 

36 

760,000 

820.000 

60,000 

8 

Average,        .         .     ^  . 

335,000 

381,666 

46,666 

14 

1  This  column  added  by  the  authors. 


'  Corrected  from  table. 


In  this  table  it  will  be  noted  that  there  are  cases  of  increase  and  cases 
of  decrease  in  the  number  of  bacteria.  In  this  particular  this  work  is  at 
variance  with  the  conclusions  drawn  from  Stocking's  table. 


CLARIFICATION    OF   MILK. 


207 


Clarence  Bahlman^  made  eight  tests  of  market  milk  in  which  he  finds 
an  average  increase  of  27  per  cent. 


Table  XXXV.  —  Effect  of  Clarifying  Milk  on  the  Microbial   Count 

(Bahlman). 


Test  No. 


1. 
2, 
3, 
4, 

5, 
6, 
7, 

8, 

Average 


Bacteria  per  Cubic 
Centimeter. 


Raw. 


630,000 

900,000 

1,400,000 

455,000 

418,000 

3,150,000 

2,160,000 

1,380,000 


1,312,000 


Clarified. 


750,000 

980,000 

1,800,000 

730,000 

580,000 

4,005,000 

2,800,000 

1,720,000 


1,670,000 


Per  Cent. 
Increase 


Bacteria. 


19 
9 
28 
60 
30 
27 
30 
25 


27 


These  results  correspond  closely  with  those  contributed  by  Stocking. 
All  tests  have  shown  an  increase  in  numbers. 

From  Hammer  2  are  gathered  some  modifications  which  give  the  nu- 
merical increase  and  decrease  of  micro-organisms  in  milks  containing' 
germ-contents  within  certain  limitations. 

•  Bahlman,  Clarence:    Milk  Clarifiers.    Amer.  Jour,  of  Pub.  Health,  1916,  Vol.  VI,  No.  8. 
'  Hammer,  B.  W.:   Studies  on  the  Clarification  of  Milk.    Iowa  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.,  1916.    Bulletin 
No.  28. 


208         MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 


Table  XXXVI.  —  Bacteria  per  Cubic  Centimeter  before  and  after  Clari- 
fication {Hammer) . 

[Original  count  under  100,000  per  cubic  centimeter.] 


Bacteria 
per  Cubic 
Centimeter 

before 
Clarification. 

Bacteria 
per  Cubic 
Centimeter 

after 
Clarification. 

Per  Cent. 
Change  in 
Number. 

Bacteria 
per  Cubic 
Centimeter 

before 
Clarification. 

Bacteria 
per  Cubic 
Centimeter 

after 
Clarification. 

Per  Cent. 
Change  in 
Number. 

61,500 

58,500 

— 5 

12,700 

13,450 

6 

70,000 

61,000 

—13 

25,800 

26,300 

2 

48,000 

71,500 

49 

22,200 

23,800 

7 

19,530 

20,400 

4 

24,850 

20,250 

—19 

41,000 

41,000 

0 

8,200 

7,950 

—3 

11,650 

15,850 

36 

6,700 

6,700 

0 

83,000 

98,500 

19 

63,000 

78,000 

24 

20,250 

15,400 

-24 

30,500 

46,500 

52 

35,500 

31,500 

—11 

97,000 

78,000 

—20 

91,500 

95,500 

4 

45,500 

51,000 

12 

67,500 

70,500 

4 

22,500 

26,700 

19 

38,000 

35,000 

—8 

16,250 

17,300 

6 

61,000 

62,000 

2 

19,150 

20.000 

4 

56,500 

46,500 

—18 

7,150 

9,250 

29 

35,500 

126,500 

256 

8,300 

7,000 

—16 

24,500 

24,500 

0' 

75,500 

111,000 

47 

24,500 

24,500 

0 

73,500 

149,500 

103 

18,500 

53,000 

186 

15,000 

28,500 

90 

48,500 

43,000 

—11 

37,500 

35,000 

— 7 

32,500 

36,000 

11 

48,500 

63,500 

31 

19,050 

20,150 

6 

71,500 

147,500 

106 

42,000 

41,000 

—2 

36,500 

50,000 

37 

7,900 

6,500 

—18 

26,000 

53,500 

106 

5,700 

6,150 

8 

97,500 

132,000 

35 

18,450 

24,400 

32 

59,000 

63,000 

7 

9,900 

11,100 

12 

1  Corrected  from  table. 


CLARIFICATION   OF   MILK. 


209 


Table  XXX^'II. — Bacteria  per  Cubic  Centimeter  before  and  after  Clari- 
fication {Hammer) . 

[Original  count  from  100,000  to  500,000  per  cubic  centimeter.] 


Bacteria 
per  Cubic 
Centimeter 

before 
Clarification. 

Bacteria 
per  Cubic 
Centimeter 

after 
Clarification. 

Per  Cent. 

Change  in 

Number. 

Bacteria 
per  Cubic 
Centimeter 

before 
Clarification. 

Bacteria 
per  Cubic 
Centimeter 

after 
Clarification. 

Per  Cent. 
Change  in 
Number. 

257,000 

247,000 

—4 

450,000 

345,000 

-23 

227,000 

219,000 

—4 

460,000 

435,000 

—5 

179,500 

150,500 

—16 

190,000 

392,000 

106 

226,000 

233,500 

3 

365,000 

450,000 

23 

142,500 

139,000 

—2 

105,000 

141,000 

34 

107,000 

117,000 

9 

141,500 

177,000 

25 

128,000 

121,000 

—5 

142,500 

194,000 

36 

111,000 

101,000 

-9 

460,000 

605,000 

32 

101,000 

64,500 

—36 

430,000 

1,235,000 

187 

131,000 

149,500 

14 

340,000 

495,000 

46 

400,000 

450,000 

12 

390,000 

540,000 

38 

480,000 

560,000 

17 

260,000 

400,000 

54 

233,000 

320,000 

37 

179,000 

238,000 

33 

260,000 

435,000 

67 

Table  XXXVIII.  —  Bacteria  per  Cubic  Centimeter  before  and  after  Clari- 
fication (Hammer). 

[Original  count  over  500,000  per  cubic  centimeter.] 


Bacteria 
per  Cubic 
Centimeter 

before 
Clarification. 

Bacteria 
per  Cubic 
Centimeter 

after 
Clarification. 

Per  Cent. 
Change  in 
Number. 

Bacteria 
per  Cubic 
Centimeter 

before 
Clarification. 

Bacteria 
per  Cubic 
Centimeter 

after 
Clarification. 

Per  Cent. 
Change  in 
Number. 

1,185,000 

1,470,000 

24 

970,000 

705,000 

—27 

5,450,000 

5,700,000 

5 

580,000 

655,000 

13 

1,885,000 

1,800,000 

—5 

645,000 

385,000 

-40 

1,050,000 

1,095,000 

4 

2,385,000 

2,985,000 

25 

2,110,000 

2,265,000 

7 

765,000 

1,275,000 

67 

960,000 

1,080,000 

12 

1,590,000 

1,870,000 

18 

550,000 

1,110,000 

102 

545,000 

785,000 

44 

Fifty-one  comparisons  were  made  on  samples  showing  less  than  100,000 
organisms  per  cubic  centimeter.  In  3  cases  (6  per  cent.)  the  bacterial  content 
before  and  after  clarification  was  the  same;  in  14  cases  (27  per  cent.)  there  was 
a  decrease  during  clarification  varying  from  2  to  24  per  cent.,  and  averaging 


210         MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 

12  per  cent.;  while  in  the  remaining  34  cases  (67  per  cent.)  there  was  an  in- 
crease during  clarification  varying  from  2  to  256  per  cent,  and  averaging  41 
per  cent.  If  the  total  51  samples  are  considered  there  was  an  average  in- 
crease of  24  per  cent. 

Twenty-seven  comparisons  were  made  on  samples  containing  from  100,000 
to  500,000  bacteria  per  cubic  centimeter  in  the  unclarified  milk;  9  comparisons 
(33  per  cent.)  showed  a  decrease  during  clarification  varying  from  2  to  36  per 
cent,  and  averaging  12  per  cent.,  while  18  comparisons  (67  per  cent.)  showed 
increases  varying  from  3  to  187  per  cent,  and  averaging  43  per  cent.  Con- 
sidering all  of  the  samples  there  was  an  average  increase  of  25  per  cent. 

Fourteen  comparisons  were  made  on  samples  containing  more  than  500,000 
bacteria  per  cubic  centimeter  in  the  unclarified  milk;  only  3  comparisons 
(21  per  cent.)  showed  a  decrease  during  clarification,  1  of  5,  1  of  27,  and  1  of 
40  per  cent,  (averaging  24  per  cent.),  while  11  comparisons  (79  per  cent.) 
showed  increases  varying  from  4  to  102  per  cent,  and  averaging  29  per  cent. 
There  was  an  average  increase  of  18  per  cent,  when  the  total  14  samples  are 
considered. 

The  number  of  samples  of  milk  under  100,000  bacteria  per  cubic  centi- 
meter does  not  show  a  larger  percentage  of  decreased  counts  than  the 
samples  between  100,000  and  500,000  bacteria  per  cubic  centimeter;  in 
fact,  the  milk  samples  of  over  500,000  bacteria  showed  a  less  increase  than 
the  samples  with  a  lower  number  of  organisms.  All  the  samples  were 
market  milk  samples;  accordingly,  the  histories  of  the  samples  are  un- 
known. This  makes  it  difficult  to  draw  any  specific  conclusions. 
Hammer's  work  is,  however,  very  interesting  in  cormection  with  the 
results  of  this  laboratory,  which  will  be  furnished  later. 

A  general  critical  review  of  the  clarifier  tests  has  been  written  by  Prof. 
E.  G.  Hastings  for  the  Journal  of  the  American  Medical  Association  for 
March  24,  1917.  His  conclusion  intimates  that  the  clarifier  may  not  be 
a  progressive  step  in  the  purification  of  milk.  This  is  a  somewhat  hasty 
conclusion  without  his  having  investigated  the  results  of  its  action  a 
little  more  closely.  Too  much  is  superficially  apparent  in  its  action  to 
turn  it  aside  with  the  w^ave  of  the  hand  and  the  cynical  remark,  "What 
next?"  An  extended  acquaintance  with  the  machine  and  its  operations 
will  at  least  suggest  very  subtle  problems,  perhaps  much  more  illuminat- 
ing if  solved  than  any  which  have  been  attacked  thus  far,  and  causes  one 
to  speculate  about  milk  questions  which  have  been  heretofore  untouched 
or  remotely  surveyed.  From  time  to  time  these  suggestions  will  be 
hinted  at  in  the  text. 


CLARIFICATION    OF   MILK. 


211 


T,  J.  Mclnerney^  has  contributed  the  following  table,  which  indicates 
the  effect  of  clarification  upon  the  bacterial  count  in  fresh  and  old  milk:  — 


Table  XXXIX.  —  Effect  of  Clarification  on  the  Bacterial  Content  of 
Fresh  Milk  (Mclnerney). 


Bactehia  per  Cubic 
Centimeter  — 

Increase  — 

EXPEPIMENT. 

In 

Unclarified 

Milk. 

In 

Clarified 
Milk. 

Per  Cubic 
Centimeter. 

Per  Cent. 

1, 

700 

1,600 

900 

128.57 

2, 

2,300 

2,400 

100 

43.48 

3, 

641 

1,825 

1,184 

184.71 

4, 

1,250 

2,483 

1,233 

98.64 

5. 

563 

2,900 

2,337 

415.10 

6, 

1,400 

1,475 

75 

5.36 

7, 

525, 

1,100 

575 

109.52 

8, 

6,000 

9,000 

3,000 

50.00 

9, 

10,000 

30,000 

20,000 

200.00 

10. 

■■ 

1,100 

1,400 

300 

27.27 

11. 

5,000 

10,000 

5,000 

100.00 

12, 

4,000 

4,000 

0 

- 

13, 

4,500 

18,000 

13,500 

300.00 

14, 

3,600 

5,000 

1,400 

38.39 

15, 

2,100 

2,600 

500 

23.81 

16, 

3,650 

5,550 

1,900 

52.05 

17, 

7,000 

20,000 

13,000 

185.71 

18, 

5,480 

12,125 

6,645 

121.26 

19, 

10,000 

13,000 

3,000 

30.00 

20, 

11,320 

13,600 

2,280 

20.14 

21, 

4,280 

8,000 

3,720 

86.91 

22, 

4,600 

4,250 

—350 

- 

23, 

1.600 

4,100 

2,500 

156.25 

24, 

15,000 

22,000 

7,000 

46.67 

25, 

53,000 

71,500 

18,500 

34.90 

26,       . 

60,000 

156,000 

96,000 

160.00 

27,       . 

5,675 

5,775 

100 

1.76 

28, 

10,200 

11,000 

800 

7.84 

Av 

erage 

• 

8,410 

15,739 

7,329 

87.15 

»  Mclnerney,  T.  J.:   Clarification  of  Milk.    Cornell  University  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.,  1917.    Bulletin 

No.  389. 


212         MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 


Table  XL.  —  Effect  of  Clarification  on  the  Bacterial  Content  of  Old  and 

Dirty  Milk  (Mchierney). 


Bacteria  per  Cubic 
Centimeter  — 

Increase  — 

Experiment. 

In 

Unclarified 

Milk. 

In 

Clarified 

Milk. 

Per  Cubic 

Centimeter. 

Per  Cent. 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

830,000 

40,000 

494,000 

133,500 

15,000,000 

37,800,000 

1,500,000 

370,000 

600,000 

55,000 

19,000,000 

248,000 

558,750 

190,000 

83,400,000 

1,590,000 

4,420,000 

13,900,000 

110,000 

6,400,000 

197,500 

30,000,000 

40,000,000 

3,200,000 

643,000 

1,300,000 

175,000 

160,000,000 

425,000 

1,863,300 

237,000 

91,030,000 

1,831,000 

5,700,000 

13,070,000 

70,000 

5,906,000 

64,000 

15,000,000 

2,200,000 

1,700,000 

273,000 

700,000 

120,000 

141,000,000 

177,000 

1,304,550 

47,000 

7,630,000 

241,000 

1,280,000 

1,574.70 

175.00 

1,195.55 

47.94 

100.00 

5.82 

113.33 

73.78 

116.67 

218.18 

742.10 

71.37 

233.48 

'      24.74 

9.15 

15.16 

28.96 

Average, 

9,778,191 

21,000,694 

11,222,503 

114.77 

CLARIFICATION   OF   MILK. 


213 


James  M.  Sherman^  has  also  furnished  his  results  of  the  bacterial 
counts  before  and  after  clarification. 


Table  XLI.  —  Effect  of  Clarification   on  the  Bacterial  Count  of  Milk 

(Sherman). 


Test  No. 


1. 

2, 

3, 

4, 

5, 

6. 

7, 

8, 

», 

10,  .  .  . 
11, 
12, 
13, 
14, 
15, 
16, 
17, 
18, 
19, 
20, 
21, 
22, 
23, 
24, 

Average, 


Bacteria  pek  Cubic 
Centimeter  — 

Machine. 

Before 
Clarification. 

After 
Clarification. 

A 

3,700 

6,100 

A 

3,800 

6,300 

A 

5,500 

8,500 

A 

2,900 

6,300 

A 

4,200 

6.200 

A 

4,100 

6.200 

A 

3,400 

7,400 

A 

3,900 

6,100 

A 

3,400 

4,900 

A 

3,000 

4,900 

A 

3,200 

6,800 

A 

4,300 

9,600 

B 

3,300 

5,600 

B 

5,900 

7,300 

B 

9,300 

13,800 

B 

4,800 

7,600 

B 

1,800 

3,100 

B 

2,500 

3,300 

B 

2,900 

3,700 

B 

11,400 

13,400 

B 

4,300 

6,400 

B 

3,600 

4,500 

B 

10,300 

13,400 

B 

7,800 

9,300 

- 

4,720 

7,120 

Again  there  is  the  decided  increase  of  micro-organisms  following  clari- 
fication. 

Although  realizing  that  the  usual  interpretation  of  microbial  counts  in 
this  connection  has  no  basis  in  actual  truth,  and  there  can  be  no  increase 
because  the  milk  passes  through  the  clarifier  so  quickly  that  there  is  no 


1  Sherman,  James  M.:    Bacteriological  Tests  of  Milk  Clarifier.    Jour,  of  Dairy  Science,  1917, 
Vol.  I,  No.  3,  p.  272. 


214         MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN   187. 

time  for  multiplication,  and,  further,  in  the  slime  large  masses  of  organ- 
isms are  found,  this  laboratory  has  felt  it  desirable,  nevertheless,  to 
undertake  the  determination  of  the  number  of  organisms  in  milk  before 
and  after  clarification,  not  so  much  for  the  purpose  of  contributing  to 
what  has  already  been  given,  but  rather  for  the  piu-pose  of  knowing  what- 
is  really  involved  in  the  determination  and  what  interpretation  of  the 
results  obtained  may  be  given.  Since  the  operation  of  clarifying  is  so 
short,  it  is  difficult  to  believe  that  any  multiplication  takes  place,  as  has 
already  been  stated  above.  If  none  takes  place  then  it  must  be  a  dis- 
ruption in  colonies,  which  leads  the  student  to  wonder  whether  there  is 
greater  efficiency  in  micro-organisms  liberated  from  a  disrupted  colony  as 
compared  with  the  same  organisms  imbedded  in  the  colony.  This  will 
appear  later. 

The  authors'  studies  were  carried  out  under  the  following  conditions :  — 

The  clarifier  used  was  No.  98  De  Laval.  It  was  run  by  a  ^-horsepower 
motor  at  uniform  speed  of  7,200  to  7,300  revolutions  per  minute.  The 
temperature  was  maintained  at  60°  C.  when  clarifying.  As  soon  as  the 
machine  reached  full  speed  the  milk  was  passed  tlirough.  The  bowls, 
discs,  etc.,  were  sterilized  in  an  autoclave  at  15  pounds  pressure  for  thirty 
minutes.  The  milk  both  before  and  after  clarification  was  thoroughly 
mixed  prior  to  taking  the  samples,  which  were  placed  in  sterile  flasks. 

In  the  case  of  certified  milk,  the  milk  was  obtained  from  the  milker  in 
the  "certified"  stable;  in  the  case  of  the  commercial  milk,  from  the 
receiving  room  of  the  college  dairy.  The  commercial  milk  came  from  the 
farmers  in  the  vicinity  of  the  college,  and  was  not  above  the  average 
commercial  milk.  It  doubtless  reached  the  clarifier  sooner  than  it  would 
had  it  been  sent  to  a  city  from  Amherst,  then  clarified  after  reaching  the 
city. 

For  estimating  the  number  of  bacteria  in  mUk,  the  Standard  Methods 
of  the  American  Public  Health  Association  were  employed.  An  effort 
was  made  to  adhere  to  these  methods  in  all  of  our  work  so  far  as 
feasible. 

A  determination  of  the  number  of  bacteria  cast  out  by  the  clarifier  into 
the  slime  has  been  undertaken  both  by  a  direct  count,  mathematical  cal-r 
culation,  and  by  repeated  maceration  and  clarification.  Methods  and 
discussion  will  be  reserved  until  after  some  facts  have  been  placed  before 
the  reader. 


CLARIFICATION   OF   MILK. 


215 


Table  XLII,  —  Bacteria  in  Certified  Milk  from  Individual  Cows  before  and 

after  Clarification. 


Sample  No. 


Cow. 


Number  of 

Organisms 

in  1  Cubic 

Centimeter 

of  Un- 

clarified 

Milk. 


Number  of 

Organisms 

in  1  Cubic 

Centimeter 

of 

Clarified 

Milk. 


Per  Cent. 
Increase. 


1, 

2, 

3, 

4, 

5. 

6, 

7, 

8, 

«. 

10, 

11. 

12, 

13, 

14, 

15, 

16. 

17, 

18, 

19, 

20, 

21. 

22, 

23. 

24, 

25, 

26, 

27, 

28. 

29, 

30, 

31, 

32, 

33, 


33 

77 

33 

77 

77 
146 

33 

77 

33 

77 

33 

62 
146 

56 

77 

24 

33 

62 
146 

77 

56 

24 

62 
62  and  33 
62  and  33 

33 

77 

33 

77 

33 

77 

33 

77 


5,000 
1,100 
4,000 
2,000 
1,100 
1,700 
4,000 
1,600 
12,000 
9,000 
4,000 
4,000 
1,500 
3,800 
11,000 
3,600 

100 

500 
1,000 
2,000 
4,000 
1,900 
2,000 

100 
5,000 
1,700 
1,500 
1,300 
1,000 
3,000 

800 
1,800 
1,500 


2,000 

800 

3,000 

2,000 

1,000 

3,000 

2,200 

5,000 

6,000 

8,000 

3,000 

1,100 

1,200 

5,000 

9,000 

1,200 

500 

400 

1,200 

800 

1,000 

1,100 

600 

200 

6,000 

1,000 

500 

2,000 

1,000 

1,500 

1,300 

600 

1,000 


—60 
—27 
—25 

—9 

76 
—45 
212 
—50 
—11 
—25 
—72 
—20 

31 

—18 

—66 

400 

—20 

20 
—60 
—75 
—42 
—70 
100 

20 
—41 
—66 

53 

—50 

62 

—66 

—33 


216         MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 

Table  XLII.  —  Bacteria  in  Certified  Milk  from  Individual  Cows  before 
and  after  Clarification  —  Concluded. 


Number  of 

Number  of 

Organisms 

Organisms 

in  1  Cubic 

in  1  Cubic 

Per  Cent. 
Increase. 

Sample  No. 

Cow. 

Centimeter 
of  Un- 

Centimeter- 
of 

clarified 

Clarified 

Milk. 

Milk. 

34 

33 

700 

1,900 

171 

35 

77 

700 

5,000 

614 

36 

33 

5,000 

2,000 

—60 

37 

77 

1,100 

800 

—27 

Table  XLIII. — Bacteria  in  Commercial  Milk  before  and  after  Clarification. 


Sample  No. 


Number  of 

Bacteria  in 

1  Cubic 

Centimeter  of 

Unclarified 

Milk. 


Number  of 
Bacteria  in 

1  Cubic 

Centimeter 

of  Clarified 

Milk. 


Per  Cent. 
Increase. 


1, 

2, 
3, 
4, 
5. 
6, 
7, 
8, 
9, 
10, 
11, 
12, 
13, 
14, 
15, 


250,000 
100,000 
75,000 
20,000 
5,000 
125,000 
130,000 
25,000 
20,000 
350,000 
30,000 
40,000 
30,000 
10,000 
16,000 


900,000 

200,000 
65,000 
50,000 
12,000 
70,000 

400,000 
48,000 
35,000 

250,000 
40,000 
50,000 
20,000 
10,000 
33,000 


260 

100 

—13 

150 

14 

—44 

207 

92 

75 

—28 

33 

25 

—33 

106 


The  following  superficial  and  provisional  conclusions  may  be  drawn 
from  these  tables :  — 

1.  In  the  case  of  fresh  certified  milk  about  70  per  cent,  of  the  tests  give 
an  increase  in  bacterial  content  in  unclarified  milk  over  the  same  milk 
clarified.    This  leaves  30  per  cent,  showing  an  increase  after  clarification. 

2.  In  the  case  of  commercial  milk  about  85  to  90  per  cent,  show  an 


CLARIFICATION    OF   MILK.  217 

increase  in  the  bacterial  content  after  clarification  over  the  same  milk 
unclarified. 

3.  The  slime  sediment  reveals  a  deposit  of  bacteria  which  of  com-se 
must  come  out  of  the  milk  undergoing  clarification  (see  page  190). 

There  seems  to  be  a  tendency,  which  is  not  universal  because  the  milk 
from  different  cows  varies  so,  for  milk  at  the  time  of  milking  (70  per  cent, 
of  the  cases)  to  undergo  a  reduction  in  the  number  of  bacteria  after  clari- 
fication as  revealed  by  plating,  while  milk  which  stands  increases  in  its 
number  of  bacteria  after  clarification  in  direct  proportion  to  the  time  that 
it  is  permitted  to  stand  before  clarification. 

This  would  indicate  that  fresh  certified  milk  is  freer  from  colonies  and 
has  a  greater  number  of  single  organisms,  and  these  single  bacteria  are 
thrown  out  with  the  slime  (see  "Slime,"  page  195),  in  some  cases  to  a 
considerable  extent.  In  certain  instances,  however,  colonies  have  formed 
and  are  disrupted,  thus  increasing  the  bacterial  content  of  certified  clari- 
fied milk  (30  per  cent,  of  the  cases). 

The  commercial  milk  appears  to  admit  of  so  much  colonizing  with  the 
subsequent  disruption  by  the  clarifier  that  a  high  percentage  (85  to  90 
per  cent.)  of  samples  will  give  an  increased  number  of  bacteria  after  clari- 
fication. Since  a  large  number  of  bacteria  is  found  in  the  slitne,  and 
there  is  little  opportunity  for  multiplication  during  the  process  of  clari- 
fication, the  increase  in  the  number  of  bacteria  is  only  apparent  and  not 
real. 

Thus  far  we  are  substantially  in  accord  with  the  report  of  the  Biochem- 
ical Laboratory  of  Boston,  Hammer  and  Bahlman.  Assuming  that  micro- 
organisms have  no  time  to  multiply,  it  follows  that  although  a  count- 
increase  is  evidenced  by  the  plating  method,  the  number  is  actually 
reduced  by  those  appearing  in  the  slime. 

Serial  Counts  of  Micro-organisms  in  Clarified  and  Unclarified  Milk  over  a 

Period  of  Time. 
Together  with  the  single  bacterial  counts  of  milk  before  and  after  clarifi- 
cation should  be  considered  two-hour  counts  of  milk,  certified  and  market, 
unclarified  and  clarified,  extending  over  seventy-two  hours.  This  study 
will  give  a  more  precise  knowledge  of  the  effect  of  clarification  upon  the 
germ-content  of  milk  in  spite  of  the  errors  creeping  in  from  colonization 
and  plating.  It  will  be  seen  at  once  that  the  graphs  depict  a  situation  not 
revealed  by  the  single  count  before  and  after  clarification,  and  they  corre- 
spond more  closely  with  actual  experience.  This  taken  together  with, 
other  factors,  as  the  character  of  fermentation  resulting  from  clarification 
(see  page  240),  has  great  significance. 


218 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 


I 


29 

)00 

W 

) 

~" 

~ 

;o 

)09 

)00 

) 

OF 

RTl 

KIT 

n  N 

Till 

_5 

)00 

)02 

3 

2 

500 

300 

3 

' 

2 

}0Q 

300 

3 

; 

5P9 

JOO 

) 

1 

)00 

w 

} 

fiOO 

)O0 

5 

/, 

100 

}00 

) 

> 

/ 

■^"^ 

1 

SO 

M 

) 

/ 

<: 

/ 

:io 

m 

5 

', 

/ 

/ 

9 

300 

3 

/ 

/ 

? 

500 

) 

1 

/ 

/' 

6 

)99 

) 

1 

1 

I 

• 
/ 

r 

500 

} 

I 

• 

7 

)00 

D 

1 

1 

/ 

• 

$ 

SCO 

^ 

1 

i 

$ 

)oo 

1 

j 

( 

/ 

e 

J^ 

500 

[) 

1   1 

f 

I 

)oq 

D 

1 

/ 

a 

4 

50Q 

3 

/ 

/ 

e 

4 

)00 

? 

\ 

/ 

/ 

5 

3 

iOO 

3 

/ 

1 

2 

100 

3 

/ 

• 
1 

2 

iOO 

■) 

/   / 

• 
f 

Z 

aoo 

■) 

/    1 

1500 

3 

) 

/ 

/ 

_1500 

■) 

/ 

1' 

— 

90O 

3 

/ 

'. 

poo 

3 

J 

\ 

/ 

70\T 

■) 

y 

f  1 

\\ 

N 

^-^ 

] 

^00 

? 

1 

1 

\^ 

/ 

7 

tJOO 

3 

* 
1 

1 

• 
1 

^ 

^na 

3 

y 

^ 

^ 

y 

V 

■1 

• 

^7* 

? 

/ 

/' 

r 

r 

^\ 

/ 

\i^' 

In 

■if 

ed 

HI 

i 

— 

CCf, 

3 

N 

^ 

V 

/ 

■^ 

OT 

T\ 

'!?< 

U 

Ik 

1— 

>— < 

nn 

^ 

i.-^ 

/^ 

m 

ri 

Iw 

M 

TV- 

\ 

BJ 

id  : 

ilil 

le 

-■ 

-- 

I 

> 

1- 

\ 

1  ] 

3   1 

?   1 

4  1 

5  1 

B   f 

)  '' 

2   ?. 

4  ? 

R  Z 

!   7, 

R  4 

3  4 

i  4 

3  & 

\  6 

3    7 

J 

Ho 

urs 

\i 

PI 

it! 

«« 

_ 

CLARIFICATION   OF   MILK. 


219 


'20 

ooo 

300 

0 

n 

"" 

"^ 

~ 

IC 

00? 

r 
1000 

9 

_, 

OJ 

^l 

f;^ 

p  ^^ 

w 

__ 

£ 

000 

000 

0 

S 

600 

BOO 

0 

£ 

900 

poo 

9 

; 

M^ 

09C 

0 

y 

] 

00( 

poo 

0 

/ 

»c 

9O0 

0 

J0< 

Ooo 

0 

•  — H 

6C 

000 

0 

IC 

OOC! 

0 

-- 

1 

';i 

c 

OOCI 

0 

'i 

f 

6<M 

0 

'1 

« 

OOfl 

0 

|| 

5M 

0 

ir 

f 

opt 

0 

;r 

0 

1. 

i 

00( 

0 

i( 

1 

so! 

0 

I- 

i 

1 

00( 

0 

/ 

• 
1 

a 

^ 

S0( 

0 

y 

1 

1 

t 

< 

ope 

0 

/ 

/ 

• 

1 

i 

soi; 

0 

/ 

; 

• 
1 

00( 

0 

/ 

• 

1 

50^ 

0 

\ 

■00^ 

0 

1 

: 

^0( 

0 

/ 

• 
/ 

; 

OOC 

0 

; 

i?Q( 

0 

; 

/ 

80! 

0 

1 

/ 

ym 

0 

/ 

/ 

fiCX 

0 

y 

f 

/ 

50< 

0 

/ 

/ 

/ 

W 

0 

^ 

Y^ 

/ 

.irx 

n 

y 

■V 

V 



s 

• 

/ 

/ 

nif 

ipi 

ifi 

B(1 

MH 

Ir 

2CK 

0 

-- 

y 

\ 

/ 

\ 

-  IL 

/ 

' 

/ 

• 

Clf 

rW 

1fMl 

Ml 

IK 

, 

10< 

0 

^ 

-. 

"*»«, 

^ 

/■ 

_, 

- 

/ 

r!if 

r1l 

Iftfl 

M1 

Ik 

0 

ai 

d  £ 

lin 

e 

-- 

-- 

, 

} 

( 

1 

)     1 

>  1 

i  1 

1  1 

B  2 

)  2 

Z  2 

I  2 

B  3 

;  3 

;  4 

)  4 

1  4 

3  & 

I  6 

)   7 

1 

L 

HO 

urs 

of 

PI 

stl 

ag 

220         MASS.  EXPEEIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 


?.{ 

nfx 

nn< 

0 

K 

00( 

OCX 

0 

_ 

CI 

jit: 

FU 

D  S 

111 

.. 

OCK 

OCX 

0 

5P< 

n^>( 

0 

fO0( 

OCX 

0 

/ 

.^0( 

00< 

fo 

'/ 

001 

00( 

0 

'/' 

50( 

00(10 

/ 

/. 

ICX 

ooAo 

/ 

;/ 

5( 

00(10 

< 

1 

V 

OOlJO 

^ 

> 

^oio 

'l 

350< 

10 

1 

»0 

K) 

'1 

rscx 

iQ 

'J 

?nci 

0 

II 

f.50 

X) 

ll 

,on 

10 

'■ 

i50 

10 

I 

c 

iOO 

)0 

V 

« 

tSQ^Q 

'1 

c 

tOOIK) 

;< 

e 

5501 » 

1  \ 

:60^0 

1 

MOpO 

/ 

I 

LSOOO 

'     / 

1 

lOOpO 

/■ 

9000 

1 

80 

0 

/ 

70)0 

/ 

[ 

60*0 

/ 

50)0 

( 

1 

40)0 

(  / 

-1 

30)0 

'/ 

1     V 

nclai 

ifl 

ed 

Mi  3 

t 



20'ffl_ 

/ 

V. 

s 

;/ 

-^ 

'/ 

r, 

Isril 

ifidUij 

in 

^ 

,_ 

10)0 

~^ 

xy- 

-^ 

.N 

X 

?^ 

-'^ 

c 

l?jrU 

iedj  Mj 

lU 

0 

r 

—  i— 

'— 

1"   > 

— 

ai 

d  aim 

e 

— 

-- 

1 

!> 

. 

f 

i 

i   Ip  1 

:  1 

I  a 

i   1 

!  a>  a 

;  2 

I   2 

!  3 

>   3. 

40  4^ 

,   4 

>. 

r    6 

»   7 

; 

[ 

•  1 

1 

_ 

1 

Ho 

ITS 

of 

Pliti 

>« 

1 

CLAEIFICATION    OF   MILK. 


221 


?Q 

XIO 

r- 

r 

f— 

10 

)00 

?00 

) 

. 

-  C 

ER1 

IFI 

ED 

Mil 

?c  ■ 

_ 

• 

5 

)00 

1)00 

) 

2 

iOO 

DOO 

D 

/ 

( 

2 

)0Q 

)00 

D 

/ 

/ 

• 

1 

;oo 

»0 

D 

/ 

•V 

1 

)W 

W 

D 

^ 

' 

/ 

/ 

500 

X)0 

D 

/ 

.^/ 

LOO 

DOO 

1 

/ 

Z 

/ 

^ 

DOO 

D 

' 

J 

7 

- 

10 

DOO 

D 

/ 

1  . 

9 

300 

D 

,' 

1 

8 

500 

3 

1 

1 

1 

e 

DOO 

3 

1 

7 

^00 

3 

/ 

7 

300 

3 

1 

6 

500 

3 

1 

t 

6 

000 

0 

'  1 

F- 

5 

500 

3 

'  / 

i- 

5 

000 

0 

1 

T 

4 

fjOO 

D 

/ 

1 

4 

000 

[) 

/ 

1 

a 

500 

0 

/ 

)00 

3 

*^ 

^ 

/" 

\ 

/ 

.^ 

2 

500 

3 

y 

y' 

'' 

300 

3 

(' 

V 

\ 

1 

500 

5 

; 

/ 

7^ 

" 

'~~ 

N 

^ 

[/ 

1 

DOO 

0 

/ 

/ 

\ 

^ 

'\ 

r 

900 

D 

'/ 

80C 

D 

'/ 

70(| 

D 

w 

BOO 

D 

I 

500 

0 

ij 

40C 

0 

?X)r 

3 

rrtif' 

Inr 

Ki 

B(i 

Mil 

K 



^ 

20C 

D 

Cli 

Tit 

r<f)is 

Mi 

IK 

^ 

inr 

0 

Dlfl 

rif 

ifii? 

Ml 

Ih- 

0 

and 

31 

ime 

-- 

•- 

c 

f 

f 

1 

0   1 

2   1 

■3.   1 

6   1 

S  i 

0   5 

2  2 

1  2 

Q  2 

2  : 

5  4 

D  4 

i  4 

3  5 

i  6 

)   7 

2 

Ho 

ur! 

0^ 

PD 

its 

ng 

J 

222         MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN   187. 


2( 

00( 

00< 

0 

1( 

00( 

00( 

0 

^. 

CI 

3?r 

FII 

•D  1 

lit 

_. 

00( 

00( 

0 

D0< 

00( 

o 

00( 

00( 

K) 

■ 

50( 

OCX 

0 

00( 

00( 

0 

50( 

00( 

0 

ao( 

00( 

0 

5< 

00! 

0 

K 

on( 

0 

/ 

00( 

0 

' 

^ 

50( 

0 

/ 

• 

100( 

() 

/ 

?50( 

0 

/ 

(■OO! 

0 

/ 

/  / 

>5n( 

0 

/ 

^00( 

10 

/  1 

r 

t. 

ff;o( 

lO 

, 

//' 

c 

.00( 

10 

/ 

% 

■501 

lO 

^i 

« 

K)0( 

lO 

/ 

,1 

0 

ir.o< 

10 

I 

iOO( 

10 

/ 

I 

;r)U( 

lO 

/ 

1 

• 

:0Q 

lO 

.^^ 

f 

50 

)0 

/ 

.00 

10 

/ 

90 

It) 

// 

• 

80 

)0 

7 

70 

lO 

/ 

1 

/ 

60 

»0 

i  / 

y 

/' 

/ 

50 

lO 

\ 

' 

\ 

^ 

/ 

/ 

/ 

40 

lO 

\ 

/ 

\ 

J 

A 

/\ 

X 

- 

• 

.^0( 

lO 

L 

-/ 

— 

7 

■^^ 

k 

/ 

I?n 

la 

ifl 

Hd 

Mi 

K 

20 

)0 

\ 

/ 

"s. 

/ 

* 

'— 

r.if 

r| 

!<"<; 

M 

n 

, 

1 

10 

lO 

-^ 

^ 

rif 

r1 

ific 

M 

IK 

0 

ai 

d  5 

lln 

;e 

-- 

-- 

) 

. 

I 

i 

1  1 

0  1 

2  1 

4   1 

6   1 

8  2 

5   2 

2  2 

\  i 

3  ; 

:   3 

5  4 

3  4 

i  4 

3  5 

1   6 

D    7 

2 

He 

ura 

^ 

PI 

3ti 

!!fj 

1 

_J 

CLARIFICATION    OF   MILK. 


223 


P< 

)00i 

•OP! 

0 

r 

[— 

4< 

OOi 

llOOl 

0 

_, 

C( 

MWi 

:rc 

AL 

MI. 

K  ■ 

_ 

)G0 

OOi 

0 

21 

^00 

,<00l 

0 

"Tl 

^ 

K 

^00( 

oo( 

0 

/ 

7 

■^ 

/ 

0^ 

/^: 

?* 

?00 

^00! 

0 

/j 

/ 

"^ 

?00( 

00( 

0 

llf 

joa 

WCI 

0 

/ 

V 

**  -^ 

11 

-OOi 

00( 

0 

// 

\^ 

/t 

^0 

^OOi 

0 

^/ 

/ 

\^ 

/H 

isoi 

)00{ 

0 

/ 

V 

v 

'L 

'^ 

\ 

1  ' 

• 

iOO 

)00l 

)0 

^/ 

N 

/^ 

(.50 

)30: 

;o 

|.oo 

)00l 

)0 

w 

50 

)00 

w 

/ 

f 

40 

)00 

)0 

it 

SO 

)Q0 

)o 

// 

20 

)00i 

^0 

^ 

7 

10 

(OOi 

>0 

c 
i 

, 

5 

)00 

)0 

V 

1 

X>Q 

)0 

fi 

)00 

)0 

2 

iSO 

)0 

JOO 

)0 

?50 

)0 

?00 

)0 

i50 

10 

;co 

)0 

;:'0 

)0 

500 

JO 

rf,0 

)0 

WO 

)0 

550 

)0 

500 

10 

',r>o 

K) 

Jnc 

Lar 

Lfi 

id 

ai 

c 



200 

)0 

na 

if 

ierl 

Mi 

\y. 

,_ 

,_ 

, 

lf>0 

)0 

;iai 

•}f 

.ed 

Mi 

L)S 

100 

)0 

an 

i  S 

LiK 



-- 

1 

. 

: 

; 

1  1 

)  1 

;  1 

t  1 

>  1 

i  H 

)  2 

:  2 

,   2 

i  3 

;  3 

>   4 

)  t^ 

4 

3  5 

I  6 

)   7 

> 

Ho 

ars 

of 

PI 

iti 

12 

224 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 


50 

WO 

^oo 

3 

r~ 

40 

wo 

boo 

) 

_ 

-  C 

3MM 

iSC 

Ui 

Ml 

JC 

_ 

^0 

)00 

)00 

> 

20 

)00 

)00 

3 

10 

)00 

)00 

) 

a 

)00 

100 

3 

6 

100 

100 

3 

5 

)00 

)00 

) 

4 

)00 

)00 

3 

3 

)C0 

)00 

3 

, 

iOO 

lOO 

1 

£ 

)00 

)00 

3 

1 

■)00 

;Q0 

3 

/ 

1 

)00 

)0C 

3 

/ 

iOO 

100 

3 

y^ 

V 

/ 

^00 

)00 

3 

/ 

/ 

\\ 

J_ 

^00 

)r;0 

3 

/ 

/ 

I 

200 

)rx) 

/ 

• 

/ 

r 

« 

"^ 

LOO 

)00 

3 

^ 

,' 

^ 

f 

50 

)0() 

3 

^^ 

^.^ 

'" 

c 

10 

100 

■) 

^ 

.^ 

'  / 

<: 

9 

)00 

) 

y 

/ 

^ 

8 

500 

3 

\ 

/ 

a 

300 

3 

y 

M 

^ 

7 

500 

3 

\ 

/« 

7 

300 

3 

\ 

!• 

6 

500 

3 

\ 

jl 

6 

^00 

:> 

\ 

\ 

n 

5 

500 

3 

/ 

^ 

V 

"i 

• 
1 

f? 

SQQ 

} 

^ 

^ 

A 

• 

4 

wc 

) 

\ 

/ 

''' 

1 

4 

000 

) 

^ 

k 

/ 

K 

500 

3 

• 

• 

/ 

:^ 

000 

0 

/ 

s 

• 

\ 

/ 

g 

500 

3 

,/ 

/i 

/ 

Vn 

:1a 

rif 

led 

Mi 

Ik 

_ 

(300 

) 

TT 

>« 

< 

•'d 

CI 

iri 

fie 

L  M 

.lie 

.-. 

1 

500 

3 

s 

y 

f)l 

iri 

np' 

i  ivr 

llf 

3 

OOP 

9 

a 

Id 

Jlii 

la 

-- 

-- 

C 

< 

^ 

( 

1 

3  1 

J  1 

1 1 

- 1 

i  2 

3   E 

2  2 

I  ^ 

i  5 

:  3 

?  4 

3  4J 

k   4 

3  5 

I  6 

)  7 

> 

Ho 

ITS 

of 

PI 

Iti 

ig 

_ 

CLARIFICATION   OF   MILK. 


225 


5 

00 

OCi 

0 

-_ 

"■" 

— 

-1. 

ooc 

OOi 

0 

- 

cc 

um 

EC] 

AL 

Mil 

K  - 

- 

5( 

oc 

OOC 

0 

2l 

cot 

OOC 

0 

IC 

ooc 

ooc 

0 

ooc 

occ 

0 

t 

ooc 

wc 

0 

/, 

ooc 

ooc 

0 

• 

V 

/ 

.t:: 

\l 

,-«' 

/ 

/( 

i 

oo; 

ooc 

0 

/ 

k 

^ 

— 

- 

^ 

/ 

• 

i 

// 

'/ 

Vv 

ooc 

ooc 

0 

/ 

\\ 

/  . 

- 

~., 

i\ 

• 

r:: 

-7^ 

^ 

-^ 

50< 

ooc; 

0 

/ 

^1 

;/ 

"~" 

" 

\ 

/ 

ooc 

ooc 

0 

// 

/ 

501 

ooc 

0 

\l 

ooc 

00! 

0 

.' 

/-^ 

5o; 

ooc 

0 

.y 

40. 

'00( 

0 

^ 

y-. 

*  / 

30C 

ooc 

0 

t 

20( 

ooc 

0 

y 

t- 

lOC 

001 

10 

- 

5( 

i00» 

lO 

t 

IC 

Q0( 

lO 

c 

ooc 

0 

a 

r,g, 

0 

ooc 

0 

'50( 

0 

raoi 

0 

( 

50C 

0 

• 

( 

0U< 

0 

1 

50< 

0 

ooc 

0 

f?0( 

0 

occ 

0 

fiOl 

0 

001 

r> 

' 

50( 

0 

Tint 

la: 

if 

©4 

Mi: 

y. 

00 

0 

01' 

ri- 

w 

M 

lie 

^_ 



, 

Bn 

)0 

ov 

r1l 

Im 

M 

llr 

00( 

0 

ai 

d: 

lil 

le 

-• 

— 

( 

: 

, 

t- 

1  1 

1  1 

Z  1 

\  \ 

;  1 

?  2 

t)  2 

2  2 

V  2 

8  S 

I  3 

>  4 

[>  -l 

t  4 

!  5 

3r  6 

3   7 

> 

Ho 

ars 

of 

PI 

ati 

ag- 

226         MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN   187. 


^ 

Ot)(, 

091; 

0 

— 

-1 

r— 

f- 

4( 

OCX. 

OCX 

0 

-  c 

Tua 

w, 

\AL 

HI 

J( 

_ 

W 

10  oc 

ooc 

10 

?s 

05! 

w 

0 

)( 

lOo; 

ooc 

p 

1 

gcx 

W( 

0 

ooc 

ooc 

0 

OCX 

ooc 

0 

QC; 

no; 

0 

fin( 

no: 

n 

(iOl 

Ofh 

0 

^ 

ow 

lii»( 

0 

/ 

r>g<j 

og( 

0 

/' 

y 

no( 

00( 

0 

V 

no' 

■ifini 

10 

/) 

■y 

^ 

4«( 

no( 

?0 

^ 

\/ 

/ 

30( 

|)00i 

0 

//A 

o 

?0( 

iO0( 

0 

//!/ 

" 

101 

if)ni 

^0 

/ 

/ 

1 

0 

■' 

■oni 

0 

/ 

/ 

« 

1001 

^0 

■ 

■=. 

srt: 

rr 

r:^ 

1 

4 

K}() 

10 

/ 

f 

S 

•fiCl 

m 

/ 

/ 

i 

m\ 

>Q 

/ 

.^ 

.— 

— 

'^ 

TiO 

HI 

/ 

/ 

• 

"on 

10 

// 

/ 

i'iO 

10 

'  / 

/ 

>on 

10 

/ 

/ 

• 

'ffi 

?0 

/ 

iOO 

Ift 

; 

, 

t'iO 

X) 

/ 

V 

V 

- 

/ 

W0< 

10 

/ 

s 

/ 

f 

/^ 

A 

,/ 

)r>n 

w 

' 

/ 

,x 

f 

mo 

Kl 

J 

,•• 

'"iO 

10 

/ 

,— 

\, 

y 

U" 

;:^a 

•if 

.ed 

i«i- 

k 

iOO 

)0 

/ 

r 

m 

"IfH 

1   M 

llr 

^ 

, 

\'\(Y 

10 

f 

/ 

n 

n 

'1H 

1   M 

llr 

100 

10 

y 

aj 

Id 

bi 

>a 

-1 

— 

) 

t 

1  a 

)  1 

J  1 

\  1 

\  1 

)  2 

)  S 

:  2 

It  s 

)  S 

;  !t 

1  4 

f  41 

,  ft 

•  & 

-  e< 

7 

. 

_ 

Eo 

ITS 

of 

Pli 

iti 

>« 

CLARIFICATION   OF   MILK. 


227 


SO 

WO 

)W 

J 

1 

"" 

^^ 

■■" 

w 

»0 

)0(? 

) 

- 

C( 

Wl\ 

£C 

Ah 

MUK  - 

_ 

30 

)00 

300 

i 

20300 

)00 

) 

10 

300 

)00 

) 

/ 

J=^ 

a 

)00 

300 

) 

y 

; 

§ 

)W 

JOO 

) 

jf 

J 

. 

DOQ 

noo 

J 

' 

4 

9M 

poo 

> 

f 

( 

3 

DOO 

)00 

) 

/ 

/ 

2 

sw 

)09 

y 

/ 

2 

sop 

poo 

) 

/ 

">. 

> 

/ 

1 

m 

)0(} 

> 

__ 

/ 

/ 

1 

aov 

JOO 

/ 

— 1 

' 

iOO 

)W 

) 

fcwr 

f^ 

■^ 

^ 

/ 

■^ 

\ 

_■ 

MO 

)00 

) 

r  ■ 

'— 

r- 

*~ 

iOO 

aoo 

1 

c 

soo 

iflfi 

n 

/ 

i 

W) 

3OO0 

^, 

^' 

p 

w 

?w 

p 

L./ 

^ 

T^ 

^ 

f 

a 

;<? 

ooo 

) 

^ 

>.< 

y^ 

0 

9 

300 

) 

S 

9 

W 

) 

e 

BOO 

_z 

iOO 

) 

7)23! 

) 

sBoo! 

^JOOj 

) 

5>00 

) 

_&ia2 

1 

4  SCO 

) 

4)00 

3 

fion^ 

) 

? 

1 
poo( 

? 

ia 

it 

jkL 

m' 

jt_ 

2 

^00 

) 

<3X 

rt 

n* 

V 

Vf, 

p— 

1 

)00< 

> 

r,i 

irt 

Im 

II 

\t 

1 

)^^| 

« 

Id  ! 

liJ 

m 

1 — 

f\ 

' 

i 

^ 

1   1 

?  1 

1 1 

i  1 

R  ? 

\\  7 

'  ?, 

ft  7. 

f1  :i 

',   .1 

1  4 

)  4 

I  4 

•)  R 

i  <) 

?  f 

! 

HO 

vca 

of 

£ 

tn. 

« 

L_- 

The  conclusion  may  be  drawn  from  these  graphs  that  there  is  no  great 
distinction  to  be  made  between  clarified  and  unclarified  milk  so  far  as 
bacterial  counts  are  concerned.  Yet  when  the  character  of  change  is 
contrasted,  microbial  influences  are  patent  as  between  the  unclarified  and 
clarified  samples. 

Incidental  questions  having  more  or  less  relation  to  the  previous  dis- 
cussion may  arise.  Some  of  these  questions  have  been  anticipated  in  our 
work,  and  have  been  added  as  illuminative  material. 


228 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 


Table  XLFV.  —  A  Determination  of  the  Niimher  of  Bacteria  per  Cubic 
Centimeter  in  Clarified  and  Unclarified  Commercial  Milk  Held  at  14°  C. 
and  Plated  at  Intervals  of  Twenty-four  Hours. 


Test. 

Sample. 

At  Once. 

24  Hours. 

48  Hours. 

72  Hours. 

I.   . 

Before  clarification. 
After  clarification. 

3,600,000 
2,600,000 

1,750,000 
3,100,000 

5,600,000 
5,200,000 

250,000,000 
250,000,000 

II, 

Before  clarification, 
After  clarification, 

36,000 
34,000 

800,000 
525,000 

67,100,000 
50,600,000 

80,000,000 
40,000,000 

III, 

Before  clarification, 
After  clarification, 

3,600 
2,100 

- 

4,100,000 
3,700,000 

7,500,000 
15,000,000 

IV, 

Before  clarification. 
After  clarification. 

28,000 
39,000 

9,958,000 
9,950,000 

210,000,000 
220,000,000 

350,000,000 
400,000,000 

V.  . 

Before  clarification. 
After  clarification, 

2,500 
2,350 

2,300 
3,200 

230,000 
190,000 

25,000,000 
39,000,000 

VI, 

Before  clarification. 
After  clarification. 

7,750,000 
6,340,000 

40,000,000 
27,400,000 

539,000,000 
465,000,000 

752,000,000 
441,000,000 

VII, 

Before  clarification. 
After  clarification, 

4,000,000 
2,740.000 

14.600,000 
19,600.000 

201,000,000 
209,000,000 

400,000,000 
187,000,000 

VIII.      . 

Before  clarification. 
After  clarification. 

500,000 
450,000 

20,400,000 
13,500,000 

120,000,000 
160,000,000 

237,000,000 
135,000,000 

IX, 

Before  clarification, 
After  clarification, 

330,000 
240,000 

14,500,000 
10,000.000 

41,200,000 
40,000,000 

166,000,000 
100,000,000 

X, 

Before  clarification,    . 
After  clarification. 

4,500,000 
4,000,000 

21,200,000 
19,200,000 

340,000,000 
210,000,000 

750,000,000 
450,000,000 

XI, 

Before  clarification. 
After  clarification, 

1,500,000 
1.200.000 

20,000,000 
25,000,000 

500,000,000 
420,000,000 

650,000,000 
560.000.000 

Table  XLV.  —  A  Determination  of  the  Number  of  Bacteria  per  Cubic  Centi- 
meter in  Clarified  and  Unclarified  Certified  Milk  Held  at  10°  C.  and 
Plated  at  Intervals  of  Twenty-four  Hours. 


Test. 

Sample. 

At  Once. 

24  Hours. 

48  Hours. 

I 

Before  clarification. 
After  clarification,  . 

940 
580 

1.000 
1,050 

900 
600 

II, 

Before  clarification. 
After  clarification.  . 

1,450 
4,200 

2,200 
3,700 

2.400 
4,600 

Ill 

Before  clarification, 
After  clarification,  . 

1,800 
2,600 

1,740 
2,500 

2,000 
3,200 

IV 

Before  clarification, 
After  clarification.  . 

980 
810 

1,150 
860 

1,000 
650 

V 

Before  clarification, 
After  clarification,  . 

1,400 
i;200 

1.100 
1.750 

1.000 
1,200 

VI 

Before  clarification, 
After  clarification,  . 

4,000 
3,000 

4,000 
3,100 

4,300 
2,500 

VII 

Before  clarification, 
After  clarification,  . 

5,000 
4,000 

4,700 
5,000 

2.300 
1,400 

vni 

Before  clarification. 
After  clarification.  . 

3,000 
4,100 

2,300 
2.000 

3.500 
2,500 

CLARIFICATION    OF   MILK. 


229 


Incidentally  only,  it  is  interesting  to  note  the  effect  of  repeated  clari- 
fication upon  the  same  sample.  From  this  it  may  be  seen  that  neither 
the  slime  nor  bacteria  are  removed  to  such  an  extent  that  repeated  clari- 
fication will  not  eliminate  more  bacteria  and  more  slime. 


Table  XLVI.  —  Effect  of  Repeated  Clarification  on  Bacterial  Count  of 
Same  Sample  of  Market  Milk. 


Bac- 
teria 
per 
Cubic 
Centi- 
meter 

in 
Milk. 

Weight 

of 
Slime 

in 
Grams. 

Second 
Clarification. 

Third 
Clarification. 

Fourth 
Clarification. 

>  . 

Bac- 
teria 
per 
Cubic 

Centi- 
meter. 

Weight 

of 
Slime 

in 
Grams. 

Bac- 
teria 
per 
Cubic 
Centi- 
meter. 

Weight 

of 
Slime 

in 
Grams. 

Bac- 
teria 
per 
Cubic 
Centi- 
meter. 

Weight 

of 
Slime 

in 
Grains. 

Before  clarification,  . 
After  clarification,    . 

Before  clarification,  . 
After  clarification,    . 

Before  clarification,  . 
After  clarification,    . 

50,000 
70,000 

7,000 
17,000 

25,000 
18,000 

3.122 
2.091 
3.265 

74,000 
48,000 

25,000 
11,000 

9,000 
22,000 

1.379 
1.002 
1.315 

48,000 
40,000 

11,000 
22,000 

1.236 
.927 
.865 

40,000 

.925 

In  connection  with  the  singlfe  and  serial  bacterial  counts  it  will  be 
pertinent  to  study  also  the  effect  of  clarification  upon  specific  organisms 
in  different  substances,  for  in  this  manner  a  possibility  is  furnished  of 
gaining  some  adequate  notion  of  how  the  clarifier  acts  in  centrifuging  out 
certain  types  of  organisms. 

Table  XLVII.  —  Effect  of  Clarification  on  Pure  Cultures  of  Bacteria. 

B.  suhtilis. 


Suspended  in  • 


Before 
Clarification. 


After 
Clarification. 


Result 

or  Per  Cent. 

Removed. 


First  Test. 

Water 

Broth  (A.  P.  H.  A.),    .        . 
Skimmed  milk,    . 

Second  Test. 

Water, 

Broth  (A.  P.  H.  A.),  . 
Skimmed  milk,    . 
Whole  milk, 


105,000 
95,000 
107,000 

75,000 
90,000 
95,000 
92,000 


7,000 
15,000 
48,000 

2,000 
18,000 
25,000 
56,000 


93.3 
84.3 
55.2 

97.0 
80.0 
74.0 
40.0 


230         MASS.  EXPEEIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN   187. 


Table  XLVII.  —  Effect  of  Clarification  on  Pure  Cultures  of 
Bacteria  —  Continued. 

B.  colt. 


Suspended  in  — 


Before 
Clarification. 


After 
Clarification. 


Result 

or  Per  Cent. 

Removed. 


First  Test. 
Water, 

Broth  (A.  P.  H.  A.),  . 

Skimmed  milk,    . 

Whole  milk, 


Second  Test. 
Water 

Broth  (A.  P.  H.  A.),  . 

Skimmed  milk,   . 

Whole  milk. 


480,000 
465,000 
495,000 
530,000 

370,000 
395,000 
315,000 
400,000 


118,000 
115,000 
375,000 
320,000 

90,000 
135,000 
215,000 
280,000 


76 
75 
28 
40 

76 
66 
31 
30 


B.  cyanogenes. 


Water, 


20,000 


7,000 


65 


B.  megatherium. 


Water, 


10,000 


3,000 


B.  subtilia. 


Water,  . 

Gum  tragic- water. 


70,000 
70,000 


10,000 
55,000 


B.  subtilis. 


Specific 
Gravity. 

Suspended  in  — 

Before 
Clarification. 

After 
Clarification. 

Per  Cent. 
Removed. 

1.000 
1.003 
1.005 
1.009 

Water 

Water+1  per  cent,  gelatin,     . 
Water+2  per  cent,  gelatin, 
Water+4  per  cent,  gelatin,     . 

100,000 
138,000 
110,000 
120,000 

5,000 
25,000 
40.000 
48,000 

95 
82 
64 
60 

B.  subtilis. 


1.000 

Water 

65,000 

3,000 

95 

1.003 

Water+l  per  cent,  sucrose,    . 

116,000 

5.000 

94 

1.011 

Water+3  per  cent,  sucrose,     . 

126,000 

13,000 

89 

1.023 

Water+6  per  cent,  sucrose,     . 

95,000 

12,000 

87 

1.026 

Water+8  per  cent,  sucrose,     . 

103,000 

18,000 

83 

CLARIFICATION   OF   MILK. 


231 


Table  XLVII.  —  Effect  of  Clarification   on  Pure  Cultures  of 
Bacteria  —  Continued. 


Streptococcus 

pyogenes. 

Suspended  in  — 

Before 
Clarification. 

After 
Clarification. 

Per  Cent. 
Removed. 

First  Test. 

Salt  solution, 

2,120,000 

370,000 

83 

Whey  solution. 

1,750,000 

550,000 

68 

Certified  milk, 

Second  Teat. 

2,600,000 

2,100,000 

19 

Salt  solution, 

2.370,000 

345,000 

85 

Whey  solution. 

2,000,000 

850,000 

69 

Certified  milk, 

Third  Test. 

1,900,000 

1,870,000 

16 

Salt  solution. 



2,000,000 

450,000 

77 

Whey  solution, 

1,750,000 

700,000 

60 

Certified  milk. 

1,400,000 

1,000,000 

27 

Staphylococcus  albus. 


Salt  solution, 
Whey  solution, 
Certified  milk, 

Salt  solution, 
Whey  solution, 
Certified  milk, 

Salt  solution. 
Whey  solution, 
Certified  milk, 


First  Test. 


Second  Teat. 


Third  Teat. 


130,000 

10,000 

91 

175,000 

44,000 

75 

705,000 

285,000 

59 

800,000 

44,000 

94 

420,000 

143,000 

66 

870,000 

460,000 

47 

1,200,000 

180,000 

93 

400,000 

82,000 

79 

950.000 

540,000 

43 

232 


MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 


Table  XL VII.  —  Effect  of  Clarification  on  Pure  Cultures  of 
Bacteria  —  Continued. 

B.  prodigiosus. 


Suspended  in  • 


Before 
Clarification. 


After 
Clarification. 


Per  Cent. 
Removed. 


First  Test. 
Salt  solution, 
Whey  solution,     . 
Certified  milk,     . 

Second  Test. 
Salt  solution. 
Whey  solution,     . 
Certified  milk,     . 

Third  Test. 
Salt  solution. 
Whey  solution,     . 
Certified  milk,     . 


700,000 

400,000 

1,350,000 

3,100,000 
2,290,000 
3,400,000 

830,000 
2,000,000 
1,970,000 


230,000 

170,000 

1,100,000 

840,000 
1,250,000 
2,600,000 

220,000 
1,400,000 
1,370,000 


67 

57 
18 

72 
45 
22 

73 
30 
30 


B.  tumescens. 


Salt  solution. 
Whey  solution, 
Certified  milk. 

Salt  solution. 
Whey  solution. 
Certified  milk. 


Salt  solution. 
Whey  solution. 
Certified  mUk, 


First  Test. 


Second  Test. 


Third  Test. 


CLARIFICATION   OF   MILK. 


233 


Table  XLVII.  —  Effect  of  Clarification   on  Pure    Cultures  of 
Bacteria  —  Concluded. 


B.  noli. 


Suspended  in  — 


Before 
Claxification. 

After 
Clarification. 

Per  Cent. 
Removed 

6.200,000 

1,230,000 

80 

4,590,000 

4,300,000 

6 

5,510,000 

4,355,000 

21 

2,800,000 

440,000 

84 

1,800,000 

1,600,000 

11 

2,800,000 

2,590,000 

7 

1,300,000 

440,000 

66 

1,650,000 

1,270,000 

23 

2,895,000 

2,750,000 

5 

First  Test. 
Salt  solution. 

Whey  solution,     . 

Certified  milk, 

Second  Test. 
Salt  solution, 

Whey  solution,     . 

Certified  milk, 

Third  Test. 
Salt  solution. 

Whey  solution,     . 

Certified  milk,     . 


Streptococcus  lacticus. 


First  Teat. 
Salt  solution. 

Whey  solution,     . 

Certified  milk. 

Second  Test. 
Salt  solution, 

Whey  solution,     . 

Certified  milk,     . 

Third  Test. 
Salt  solution. 

Whey  solution,     . 

Certified  milk, 


4,500,000 
3,500,000 
1,000,000 

700,000 
720,000 
600,000 

400,000 

430,000 

1,060,000 


1,500,000 

1,300,000 

800,000 

120,000 

60,000 

540,000 

35,000 

70,000 

600,000 


66 
63 
20 

82 
91 
10 

91 
82 
43 


Note.  —  1.  Salt  Solution.  —  Prepared  by  adding  8.5  grams  of  sodium  chloride  to  1,000  cubic 
centimeters  of  distilled  water.    Sterilized  by  autoclaving  at  15  pounds  for  thirty  minutes. 

2.  Whey  Solution.  —  Prepared  from  whey  secured  from  the  college  dairy.  Egg  albumin  was 
added  to  the  whey,  and  heated  for  two  hours  in  the  flowing  steam.  It  was  then  filtered  clear 
through  filter  paper.    To  this  was  added  1  per  cent,  of  bacto-gelatin  and  sterilized  intermittently. 

3.  Certified  Milk.  —  Fresh  certified  milk  secured  from  the  college  herd. 

4.  In  each  of  the  experiments  1,000  cubic  centimeters  of  the  material  was  employed.  The  pure 
culture  under  test  was  added  directly  from  a  twenty-four-hour  mOk  or  broth  culture,  after  the 
quantity  of  culture  to  be  used  had  been  determined. 

5.  The  specific  gravity  and  viscosity  of  the  whey  menstruum  were  approximately  that  of  cer- 
tified milk,  as  determined  by  preliminary  experiments  with  pyknometer  and  viscosimeter. 

6.  Room  temperature  in  which  experiments  were  conducted  varied  from  19*  to  23°  C,  so  that 
clarification  was  conducted  within  this  range  of  temperature. 


234 


MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 


Table  XL VIII.  —  Effect  of  Clarification  on  Pure  Cultures  of  Molds  and 

Yeasts. 

Ehizopus  nigricans  spores. 


Before  Clarification. 

After  Clarification. 

Test  No. 

100  Dilution. 

100  Dilution. 

1,000 
Dilution. 

1 

2 
3 

10,  or  1,000  per  cubic  centimeter, 
30,  or  3,000  per  cubic  centimeter, 

11,  or  1,100  per  cubic  centimeter, 

1,  or  100  per  cubic  centimeter, 

Sterile,! 

Sterile, 

Sterile. 
Sterile. 
Sterile. 

Penicillium  glaucum  spores. 


1 

10,  or  1,000  per  cubic  centimeter, 

Sterile 

SterUe. 

2 

40,  or  4,000  per  cubic  centimeter. 

1,  or  100  per  cubic  centimeter. 

Sterile. 

3 

20,  or  2,000  per  cubic  centimeter. 

2,  or  200  per  cubic  centimeter. 

Sterile. 

Oidiuni  lactis  spores.  * 


Before  Clarification. 

After  Clarification. 

Test  No. 

1,000  Dilution. 

100  Dilution. 

1,000 
Dilution. 

1 
2 
3 

14,  or  14,000  per  cubic  centimeter,    . 
24,  or  24,000  per  cubic  centimeter,    . 
11,  or  11,000  per  cubic  centimeter,    . 

Sterile, 

4,  or  400  per  cubic  centimeter, 
X,  or  100  per  cubic  centimeter, 

Sterile. 
Sterile. 
Sterile. 

Saccha'romyces  cerevisicB. 


1 

200,  or  200,000  per  cubic  centimeter. 

1,  or  100  per  cubic  centimeter. 

Sterile. 

2 

370,  or  370,000  per  cubic  centimeter. 

1,  or  100  per  cubic  centimeter. 

SterUe. 

3 

120,  or  120,000  per  cubic  centimeter, 

3,  or  300  per  cubic  centimeter. 

Sterile. 

Aspergillus  niger  spores. 


1 

16,  or  16,000  per  cubic  centimeter,    . 

6,  or  600  per  cubic  centimeter. 

Sterile. 

2 

7,  or  7,000  per  cubic  centimeter. 

4,  or  400  per  cubic  centimeter. 

Sterile. 

3 

5,  or  5,000  per  cubic  centimeter. 

1,  or  100  per  cubic  centimeter. 

SterUe. 

Note.  —  Molds  were  grown  in  pure  culture;  spores  were  swept  up  with  sterile  filter  paper  and 
introduced  into  1,000  cubic  centimeters  of  sterile  milk.  After  thorough  agitation  mUk  was  clari- 
fied under  sterile  conditions.    Counts  were  made  immediately  before  and  after. 

Cultures  of  Saccharomyces  cerevisice  were  grown  on  wort  medium  at  room  temperature  for  three 
days;  5  cubic  centimeters  of  the  culture  were  inoculated  directly  into  1,000  cubic  centimeters  of 
SterUe  milk.  After  thorough  agitation,  milk  was  clarified  under  sterile  conditions.  Counts  were 
made  immediately  before  and  after. 

1  "Sterile"  means  that  no  colonies  appeared  when  plates  were  made  of  the  dUutions  indicated. 
«  Oidium  was  grown  directly  in  sterUe  milk  at  room  temperature  for  three  days,  untU  small 
colonies  appeared  on  surface. 


CLARIFICATION   OF   MILK. 


235 


Table  XLIX.  —  Effect  of  Three  Clarifications  on  Pure  Cultures. 


Streptococcus  pyogenes. 


Suspended  in  — 

First 
Clarification. 

Second 
Clarification. 

Third 
Clarification. 

Per 
Cent. 

Re- 
moved. 

Before. 

After. 

Before. 

After. 

Before. 

After. 

First  Test. 

Salt  solution, 

2,120,000 

370,000 

370,000 

80,000 

80,000 

14,000 

99 

Whey  solution,    . 

1,750,000 

550,000 

550,000 

250,000 

250,000 

75,000 

95 

Certified  milk,     . 

2,600,000 

2,100,000 

2,100,000 

- 

- 

800,000 

69 

Second  Test. 

Salt  solution, 

2,370,000 

345,000 

345.000 

78,000 

78,000 

15,500 

99 

Whey  solution,    . 

2,000,000 

850,000 

850,000 

325,000 

325,000 

100.000 

95 

Certified  milk,     . 

1,900,000 

1,870,000 

1,870,000 

1,200,000 

1,200,000 

900,000 

52 

Third  Test. 

Salt  solution. 

2,000,000 

450,000 

450,000 

95,000 

95,000 

22,500 

98 

Whey  solution,    . 

1,750,000 

700,000 

700,000 

370,000 

370,000 

110,000 

93 

Certified  milk,     . 

1,400,000 

1,000,000 

1,000,000 

600,000 

600.000 

400,000 

71 

Staphylococcus  albus. 


First  Test. 

Salt  solution, 

130,000 

10,000 

10,000 

1,200 

1,200 

100 

99 

Whey  solution,    . 

175,000 

44,000 

44.000 

7,500 

7,500 

1.600 

99 

Certified  milk,     . 

705,000 

285.000 

285.000 

147.000 

147,000 

56,000 

92 

Second  Test. 

Salt  solution, 

800,000 

44,000 

44.000 

3,300 

3,300 

200 

99 

Whey  solution,    . 

420,000 

143,000 

143.000 

31,000 

31,000 

3.600 

99 

Certified  milk,     . 

870,000 

460,000 

460.000 

260,000 

260,000 

126,000 

85 

Third  Test. 

Salt  solution. 

350,000 

31,000 

31,000 

1.500 

1,500 

100 

99 

Whey  solution,    . 

400,000 

82,000 

82,000 

21.000 

21,000 

4,000 

99 

Certified  milk,     . 

950,000 

540,000 

540,000 

350.000 

350.000 

75,000 

92 

236 


MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 


Table  XLIX.  —  Effect  of  Three  Clarifications  on  Pure  Cultures  — 

Continued. 

B.  tumescens. 


Suspended  in  — 

First 
Clarification. 

Second 
Clarification. 

Third 
Clarification. 

Per 
Cent. 

Before. 

After. 

Before. 

After. 

Before. 

After. 

Re- 
moved. 

First  Test. 

Salt  solution, 

31,000 

20,000 

20,000 

1,000 

1,000 

70 

99 

Whey  solution,    . 

20,000 

2,000 

2,000 

6,000 

6,000 

60 

99 

Certified  milk,     . 

33,000 

70,000 

70,000 

8,400 

8,400 

4,100 

87 

Second  Test. 

Salt  solution, 

22,500 

3,000 

3,000 

1,000 

1,000 

550 

93 

Whey  solution,     . 

13,000 

6,000 

6,000 

500 

500 

150 

98 

Certified  milk,     . 

32,000 

10,000 

10,000 

2,500 

2,500 

1,300 

96 

Third  Test. 

Salt  solution. 

40,000 

3,000 

3,000 

750 

750 

200 

99 

Whey  solution,    . 

20,000 

5,000 

5,000 

600 

600 

500 

97 

Certified  milk,     . 

77,000 

16,000 

16,000 

4,800 

4,800 

2,400 

97 

B.  coli. 


First  Test. 

Salt  solution, 

6,200,000 

1,230,000 

1,230,000 

350,000 

350,000 

90,000 

98 

Whey  solution,    . 

4,590,000 

4,300,000 

4,300,000 

1,850,000 

1,850,000 

660.000 

83 

Certified  milk,     . 

5,510,000 

4,355,000 

4,355,000 

4,000,000 

4,000,000 

3,625,000 

32 

Second  Test. 

Salt  solution, 

2,800,000 

440,000 

440,000 

210,000 

210,000 

50,000 

98 

Whey  solution,    . 

2,775,000 

2.375,000 

2,375,000 

1,130,000 

1,130,000 

430,000 

84 

Certified  milk,     . 

2,800,000 

2,590,000 

2,590,000 

2,400,000 

2,400,000 

1,900,000 

32 

Third  Test. 

Salt  solution. 

1,300.000 

440,000 

440,000 

62,000 

62,000 

26,000 

93 

Whey  solution,    . 

1,650,000 

1,270,000 

1,270,000 

620,000 

620,000 

320,000 

80 

Certified  milk,     . 

,  870,000 

1,700,000 

1,700,000 

950,000 

950,000 

750,000 

14 

CLARIFICATION   OF   MILK. 


237 


Table  XLIX.  —  Effect  of  Three  Clarifications  on  Pure  Cultures  — 

Concluded. 

B.  prodigiosiis. 


Suspended  in  — 

First 
Clarification. 

Second 
Clarification. 

Third 
Clarification. 

Per 
Cent. 

Before. 

After. 

Before. 

After. 

Before. 

After. 

Re- 
moved. 

First  Test. 

Salt  solution, 

144,000 

14,000 

14,000 

13,000 

13,000 

1,600 

91 

Whey  solution,     . 

153,000 

99,000 

99,000 

24,100 

24,100 

15,000 

90 

Certified  milk,     . 

1,100,000 

1,100,000 

1,100,000 

600,000 

600,000 

420,000 

61 

Second  Test. 

Salt  solution, 

700,000 

230,000 

230,000 

82,000 

82,000 

17,000 

97 

Whey  solution,    . 

400,000 

170,000 

170,000 

90,000 

90,000 

47,000 

88 

Certified  mUk,     . 

1,350,000. 

1,100,000 

1,100,000 

800,000 

800,000 

550,000 

59 

Third  Test. 

Salt  solution. 

830,000 

220,000 

220,000 

75,000 

75,000 

30,000 

96 

Whey  solution,    . 

2,000,000 

1,400,000 

1,400,000 

630,000 

630,000 

340,000 

83 

Certified  milk,     . 

1,970,000 

1,370,000 

1,370,000 

1,312,000 

1,312,000 

796,000 

59 

Streptococcus  lacticus. 


First  Test. 

Salt  solution, 

4,500,000 

1,500,000 

1,500,000 

375,000 

375,000 

125,000 

97 

Whey  solution,    . 

3,500,000 

1,300,000 

1,300,000 

1,000,000 

1,000,000 

400,000 

88 

Certified  milk,     . 

1,000,000 

800,000 

800,000 

360,000 

360,000 

300,000 

70 

Second  Test. 

Salt  solution. 

700,000 

120,000 

120,000 

36,000 

36,000 

8,400 

98 

Whey  solution,    . 

720,000 

60,000 

60,000 

20,000 

20,000 

1,500 

99 

Certified  milk,     . 

600,000 

540,000 

540,000 

300,000 

300,000 

80,000 

86 

Third  Test. 

Salt  solution, 

400,000 

35,000 

35,000 

12,000 

12,000 

1,200 

99 

Whey  solution,    . 

430,000 

70,000 

70,000 

40,000 

40,000 

10,000 

97 

Certified  milk,     . 

1,060,000 

600,000 

600,000 

60,000 

60,000 

50,000 

95 

238         MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 


Table  L.  —  Streptococci  Suspended   in  Milk  Subjected  to  Clarification. 

I.    Bacterial    count   of   whole   milk  J  Before  clarification,  33,000 1  , 

before  adding  streptococci.         ^After  clarification,  16,000  J 


Bacterial    count    of    same    milk  /Before  clarification,  29,000,000 
after  adding  streptococci 


;  /Before  clarification,  29,000,000  \„^  ,    . 

S  .  ,         ,      ,.  „^  „,^„  ^„„  ^24  per  cent,  mcrease. 

\After  clarification,     36,000,000  J       ^ 

II.    Bacterial   count   of   whole    milk  J  Before  clarification,  75,000  1..  ^    . 

/  >60  per  cent,  mcrease. 

before  adding  streptococci.        (_  After  clarification,  120,000  J 

Bacterial    count    of    same    milk  /Before  clarification,     2,000,000  \ 


after  adding  streptococci.  \After  clarification,       3,700,000/ 


80  per  cent,  increase. 


Colonization  of  Bacteria  in  Milk. 

Little  can  be  stated  with  any  degree  of  assurance  eoncerning  colouiza- 
tion  of  bacteria  in  milk.  That  colonization  occurs,  and  that  the  degree  of 
colonization  is  irregular  in  different  milks,  can  be  attested  in  several  ways. 
One  of  these  methods  is  set  forth  in  what  might  be  wisely  designated  as 
the  provisional  conclusions  offered  by  many  of  the  workers  who  have 
determined  the  number  of  bacteria  before  and  after  clarifying,  assuming 
that  the  increased  count  is  due  to  the  breaking  up  of  the  colonies  formed. 
This  is,  of  course,  indirect  evidence,  and  must  be  regarded  as  tentative 
until  something  more  direct  can  be  provided.  Little  is  known  of  a  definite 
character  concerning  what  bacteria  will  do  in  this  respect,  so  that  any 
conclusions  based  upon  this  precarious  factor  may  go  far  astray.  Knowl- 
edge of  exact  value  upon  this  subject  is  almost  entirely  lacking.  Again, 
the  tendency  of  bacteria  to  grow  into  colonies  is  daily  recognized,  and  yet 
there  are  conditions  of  cultures  which  do  not  favor  such  developments. 
What  can  be  said  about  milk,  and  to  what  extent  does  the  colony  vitiate 
our  crude  plating  methods  and  our  comfortable  conclusions  based  on 
them?  This  is  important  and  is  made  conspicuous  by  a  shroud  of 
ignorance. 

Efficiency  of  the  Individual  Organism  Free  and  in  Colony. 

This  leads  to  the  next  step,  which  is  also  of  significance.  Does  the 
individual  organism  in  a  colony  exercise  the  same  degree  of  physiological 
efficiency  as  when  the  organism  is  alone  and  acting  in  an  individual  role? 
We  are  told  by  Mclnerney^  that  bacteria  increased  more  rapidly  in 
unclarified  than  in  clarified  milk,  yet  a  greater  degree  of  change,  as  the 
production  of  acid,  is  recorded  in  the  milk  influenced  by  clarification  than 
in  the  check  culture  unclarified  and  uninfluenced.  This  also  occurs  in  a 
pure  culture  of  lactic  bacteria  when  shaken.  This  suggests,  possibly, 
that  per  individual  the  clarified  culture  is  doing  greater  work.  What 
values  shall  be  attached  to  the  individual  germ  free  as  against  the 
same  germ  in  a  colony?    This  we  must  know  if  we  are  going  to  interpret 

1  Mclnerney,  T.  J.:  Clarification  of  Milk.  Cornell  Univ.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  Bulletin  No.  389, 
April,  1917. 


CLARIFICATION   OF   MILK.  239 

milk  clarification,  provided  the  present  explanation  which  accounts  for 
the  increased  number  of  bacteria  after  clarification  is  tenable.  At  present 
our  knowledge  is  too  restricted  to  draw  stable  conclusions. 

Other  Considerations. 

Centrifugal  force  has  been  repeatedly  and  commonly  employed  to  eject 
micro-organisms  when  in  suspension,  which  is  the  case  in  hand.  Its 
values  for  this  purpose  are  in  a  very  general  way  understood.  From  the 
largest  micro-organism  with  limited  surface  as  compared  with  its  content, 
to  the  minutest  with  its  extensive  surface  as  compared  with  its  content, 
there  seems  to  exist  a  gradation  in  effectiveness.  In  other  words,  the 
large  organisms  are  easily  ejected,  while  the  minutest  are  with  difficulty 
cast  out.  In  the  case  of  some  of  the  invisible  viruses  the  capacity  to 
produce  disease  is  not  reduced  materially  by  centrifugalization.  In  the 
foregoing  tables  it  is  apparent  that  the  larger  micro-organisms,  as  the 
spores  of  Oidium  ladis  and  the  cells  of  Sacch.  cerevisice,  respond  readily 
to  centrifugal  force,  while  such  organisms  as  B.  prodigiosus  respond 
poorly.  Likewise,  colonies  seemingly  act  as  large  and  small  cells.  Again, 
it  is  well  known  that  micro-organisms  contain  a  variable  amount  of  fat, 
as  B.  tuberculosis.  Fat  is  easily  determined,  too,  in  varying  amounts  in 
mold  and  yeast  cells  when  subjected  to  certain  conditions  of  growth. 
The  presence  of  fat  must  influence  the  specific  gravity  of  cells,  which  in 
turn  is  closely  related  to  results  from  centrifugalization.  The  age  of 
a  microbial  cell,  or  the  stage  of  development,  is  also  bound  up  with  its 
specific  gravity,  due  probably  to  the  degradative  changes  taking  place. 
This  is  easily  seen  in  the  development  of  a  culture  when  the  old  cells 
settle  to  the  bottom. 

It  is  verj^  evident  from  physical  laws  that  the  material  in  which  micro- 
organisms are  suspended  has  a  very  important  and  peculiar  influence  in 
their  sedimentation  by  mechanical  force.  Milk,  with  its  higher  specific 
gravity  and  viscosity,  acts  as  a  deterrent  in  the  removal  of  micro- 
organisms by  centrifugalization,  as  is  clearly  evidenced  by  the  preceding 
tables  for  specific  organisms.  In  spite  of  deterrent  influences  referred  to, 
micro-organisms  are  removed  from  milk  in  as  large  quantities  as  75  per 
cent,  and  over.  Inasmuch  as  the  plate  colony-counts  probably  represent 
colonies  removed  from  milk,  the  percentage  may  rise  much  higher.  The 
results  presented  in  the  preceding  tables,  in  which  the  work  of  the  clarifier 
upon  specific  organisms  is  shown,  have  an  illuminating  bearing  on  the 
action  of  the  clarifier  in  its  practical  application  to  market  milk. 

In  considering  micro-organisms  in  milk  it  is  necessary  to  remember 
the  "ebb  and  flow"  of  species.  All  who  are  students  of  milk  have 
learned  that  in  the  course  of  fermentation-development  certain  types 
of  micro-organisms  in  milk  gradually  reach  the  crest  of  their  growth 
then  gradually  decline  in  numbers,  as  the  rise  and  fall  in  numbers  of  the 
many  species  which  are  present  in  fresh  milk,  and  which  practically  dis- 


240         MASS.   EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    187. 

appear  as  conditions  change.  This  is  also  discernible  in  the  ascendency 
and  decline  of  the  lactic  group  followed  by  other  types  wliich  appear  and 
disappear,  leading  finally  to  complete  decomposition  of  the  milk.  This 
"special  growth-curve"  which  appears  when  conditions  are  favorable  is 
a  factor  in  clarification,  for  by  this  mechanical  act  the  conditions  for 
microbial  development  are  apparently  somewhat  altered,  and  accordingly 
there  is  resulting  a  more  or  less  kaleidoscopic  change.  It  follows,  there- 
fore, that  an  additional  factor  to  those  already  controlling  the  stages  of 
alteration  or  fermentation  in  milk  has  been  introduced,  naturally  yielding 
somewhat  different  changes  in  the  course  of  milk  fermentation. 

The  removal  of  large  numbers  of  bacteria  by  clarification,  as  has  been 
established,  must  exert  some  influence  upon  the  changes  which  take  place 
in  the  clarified  milk.  Especially  will  this  be  true  if  the  types  which  yield 
more  readily  to  centrifugalization  are  cast  out  in  large  numbers  and  the 
types  which  seem  to  respond  but  poorly  remain  behind.  The  balance 
of  growth  equilibrium  is  disturbed.  When  conditions  of  growth  are  so 
complex  as  in  milk,  it  can  at  once  be  surmised  that  owing  to  the  great 
variation  in  the  germ-content  of  milk,  both  in  numbers  and  kinds,  the 
results  must  be  widely  different.  It  seems  that  there  ought  to  be  evidence 
which  will  correlate  this  great  change  in  germ-content  with  alterations  in 
clarified  milk  as  different  from  unclarified.  It  will  not  be  possible  to 
furnish  all  of  our  data  at  the  present  writing.  Only  such  evidence  as  has 
led  us  into  a  more  intimate  study  of  these  changes  will  be  given. 

When  unclarified  and  clarified  milk  of  the  same  original  sample  is 
permitted  to  stand  for  some  time  at  low  temperature  (15°  C),  so  that  the 
fermentation  changes  appearing  do  not  rush  by  unnoticed,  \dsible  altera- 
tions are  evident.  The  precipitated  casein  resulting  from  such  a  fer- 
mentation may  be  collected  then  on  a  sterilized  filter  paper,  and,  after 
covering  carefully,  allowed  to  stand  at  ordinary  temperatures  for  some 
time.  The  difference  in  the  fermentation  changes  of  the  unclarified  and 
clarified  milk  casein  is  usually  strikingly  manifest.  This  demonstrates 
that  in  the  unclarified  milk  and  casein  there  exist  organisms  which  pre- 
ponderate over  those  in  the  clarified  milk  and  casein.  Hence  the  clarifier 
has  ejected  certain  types  of  organisms  in  sufficient  numbers  to  control 
the  character  of  the  fermentation  in  the  clarified  milk  and  casein.  Whether 
these  changes  can  be  explained  by  the  elimination  of  Oidium  lactis  and 
other  molds  and  yeasts  (see  page  234)  cannot  be  definitely  stated  at 
present. 

These  observations  have  induced  us  into  undertaking  to  demonstrate 
the  factors  involved  in  these  differences.  To  this  task  our  energies  have 
been  directed,  and  some  of  the  data  are  at  present  available,  but  it  is 
felt  that  the  answer  should  be  given  as  a  single  answer  and  as  completely 
as  possible. 


CLARIFICATION    OF   MILK.  241 


IV.     SUMMARY. 

1.  It  is  evident  that  our  present  knowledge  of  clarification  does  not 
enable  us  to  reach  a  scientific  interpretation. 

2.  An  intimate  study  of  clarification  not  only  reveals  facts  which  assist 
in  its  understanding,  but  also  leads  us  into  depths  beyond  our  reach.  It 
is  constantly  presenting  suggestions  concerning  milk  investigations  which 
have  not  been  considered  heretofore  through  established  channels.  A 
fertile  field  for  research  is  opened. 

3.  The  slime  eliminated  and  the  comparison  of  the  clarified  milk  with 
the  unclarified  seem  to  offer,  at  the  present  time,  the  best  approach  to 
the  study  of  clarification. 

4.  The  amount  of  slime  eliminated  from  milk  is  variable,  and  dependent 
upon  — 

The  condition  of  the  cow,  whether  normal  or  abnormal. 

The  period  of  lactation. 

The  age  or  freshness  of  the  milk. 

The  acidity  of  the  milk. 

The  temperature  at  the  time  of  clarifying. 

The  amount  of  corpuscular  elements. 

The  amount  of  insoluble  dirt  in  the  milk. 

5.  The  food  value  removed  from  milk  through  the  elimination  of  slime 
may  be  disregarded,  unless  there  are  contained  within  some  of  the  ele- 
ments of  the  slime  nutritional  activators,  as  the  so-called  vitamines, 
which  seems  improbable. 

6.  Masses  of  cells  are  thrown  out  in  the  slime.  This  is  especially  em- 
phasized when  any  inflammation  exists  in  the  udder.  Garget,  existing  as 
it  does  in  ropy,  tenacious  form,  is  completely  ejected.  What  significance 
is  to  be  attached  to  normal  cells,  so  far  as  the  authors  are  concerned, 
cannot  be  stated  from  our  present  knowledge. 

7.  A  fibrinous  material  responding  to  fibrin  stains  is  practically  wholly 
eliminated  from  milk  in  clarification. 

8.  Practically  all  insoluble  dirt  is  removed  in  clarification.  The  clari- 
fier  is  the  most  effective  strainer  employed  in  the  diary.  Its  efficiency 
in  this  respect  is  greater  than  that  of  the  cotton  filters  of  the  Wisconsin 
Sedimentation  Tester.  Dirt  in  solution,  of  course,  is  not  subject  to  the 
action  of  a  centrifuge  or  clarifier,  inasmuch  as  it  diffuses  throughout  the 
whole  mass. 

9.  Micro-organisms  are  found  in  large  numbers  —  yes,  in  masses  —  in 
the  slime.  These  come  from  the  milk,  since  there  is  no  other  source,  and 
there  is  not  suflScient  time  to  multiply  while  passing  through  the  clarifier. 
In  certified  milk  there  is  also  a  reduction  shown  after  clarification,  as 
revealed  by  the  plating  method.  In  market  milk  the  number  is  usually 
increased  after  clarification,  as  revealed  by  the  plating  method.  This  is 
doubtless  due  to  the  disruption  of  colonies.  Besides  the  above  evidence 
there  are  the  results  of  repeated  clarification  of  milk  and  pure  cultures, 


242        MASS.  EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN   187. 

the  action  of  clarification  upon  pure  cultures,  and  the  results  secured  by 
direct  counts,  —  all  of  which  testify  to  the  elimination  of  micro-organisms 
by  the  clarifier  in  no  small  degree.  No  differentiation  between  pathogens 
and  non-pathogens  can  be  made.  The  larger  the  micro-organisms,  speak- 
ing generally,  the  greater  the  proportion  cast  out. 

10.  Frequently,  yes, commonly,  the  action  of  the  clarifier  upon  the  micro- 
organisms is  so  significant  as  to  alter  their  respective  power  or  capacity 
for  change  in  the  mUk.  This  is  easily  detectable  by  the  appearance  of 
clarified  and  unclarified  samples  when  observed  from  day  to  day  over  a 
period  of  time.  It  is  also  readily  determined  by  filtering  out  the  curd, 
when  formed,  upon  filter  paper,  and  allowing  it  to  undergo  fermentation 
for  a  few  days  under  proper  conditions. 

In  Part  II  we  shall  consider  this  alteration  in  clarified  milk  as  com- 
pared with  unclarified  milk.  The  work  has  progressed  to  a  point  that 
it  is  safe  and  only  fair  to  say  that  an  intimate  study  is  confirming  the 
general  statements  above. 


BULLETII^  ^o.    188. 


DEPARTMENT    OF   CHEMISTRY. 


THE   NUTRITION  OF  THE  HORSE. 


BY  J.  B.  LINDSEY. 


Part  I 


SOME  RESULTS  OF  IMPORTANT  INVESTIGATIONS. 
A.    Early  Investigations. 

Much  work  has  been  done,  especially  in  Europe,  concerning  the  prin- 
ciples which  underlie  the  nutrition  of  the  horse,  and  many  experiments 
made  to  test  the  practical  application  of  the  knowledge  secured.  Among 
the  Europeans  who  have  studied  these  matters  most  thoroughly  may  be 
mentioned  Boussingault ;  Baudement;  Sanson;  Grandeau,  LeClerc,  Bal- 
lancey  and  Alikan;  Lavalard;  Muntz  and  Gerard;  Wolff  and  Kellner; 
Zuntz,  Hagermann  and  Lehmann.  In  the  United  States  many  experiments 
have  been  made  concerning  the  most  suitable  feeds  and  feed  combinations 
for  horses.  Worthy  of  especial  mention  is  the  one  conducted  by  McCam- 
bell  of  the  Kansas  Experiment  Station  ^  with  the  government  horses  at 
Fort  Riley. 

The  early  investigations  were  based  largely  on  the  analysis  and  digesti- 
bility of  the  feeds  fed  and  the  relation  of  digestible  nutrients  to  mainte- 
nance and  work  performed.  Some  of  the  more  important  conclusions,  in- 
cluding particularly  the  modifications  of  rations  and  methods  of  feeding 
are  mentioned  below. 

1.  Of  the  total  food  consumed,  ^  is  needed  for  maintenance  in  a  state  of  repose, 

^  for  bodily  repair,  and  ^  for  work  performed;  or  ^^  for  maintenance 
in  repose  and  ^z  for  bodily  repair  and  work.     (Grandeau-Lavalard.) 

2.  Work  of  Grandeau  and  his  associates,  1882-94. 

(a)  Maize  was  utilized  in  varying  proportions  with  oats,  depending  upon  the 

time  of  year  and  relative  cost. 
(6)  Straw  was  gradually  substituted  for  hay,  followed  finally  by  the  complete 

removal  of  the  hay. 
(c)  Beans  were  fed  in  place  of  brewery  by-products. 

«  Bui.  No.  186,  Kans.  Exp.  Sta. 


244       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    188. 

(d)  Limited  amounts  of  oil  cakes  were  used  in  the  ration. 

(e)  The  nutritive  ratio  was  widened  from  1:  4.5  to  1:  7.1. 

(/)  Glucose  was  found  to  be  completely  digested;   starch,  from  76  to  98  per 
cent. ;  cellulose  that  could  be  hydrolyzed,  from  40  to  68  per  cent. ;  and 
crude  cellulose,  from  32  to  58  per  cent. 
(g)  The  average  horse  of  1,000  pounds  needed  for  — 

Maintenance,  at  rest,  .76  pound  of  digestible  protein  plus  8.8  pounds  of 
carbohj'drates  (including  fat  multiplied  by  2.4)  which  contains  15,000 
to  16,000  calories  and  has  a  nutritive  ratio  of  1: 10  to  1:  11. 

Maintenance  and  repair,  1  pound  digestible  protein  plus  9.9  pounds  di- 
gestible carbohydrates  (including  fat  multiplied  by  2.4)  which  con- 
tains 20,000  calories  and  has  a  nutritive  ratio  of  1:10. 

Light  Work,  1.3  pounds  digestible  protein  and  11.6  pounds  digestible 
carbohydrates  (including  fat  multiplied  by  2.4)  which  contains  some 
25,000  calories  having  a  nutritive  ratio  of  1:7.  This  amount  is  suf- 
ficient for  horses  doing  500,000  kilogrammeters  of  work  daily. 

3.  Experiments  in  the  French  army. 

The  following  nutrients  were  found  to  be  needed  per  1,000  pounds  of  live 
weight  as  a  result  of  experiments  made  by  military  officers  on  French 
army  horses  in  1887-89,  the  ration  being  composed  largely  of  oats 
and  hay: — 

Time  of  peace,  1.1  pounds  digestible  protein  plus  10.8  pounds  digestible  car- 
bohydrates, having  a  nutritive  ratio  of  1:9. 

Time  of  war,  1.35  pounds  digestible  protein  plus  10.8  pounds  digestible  car- 
bohydrates; nutritive  ratio  of  1:8. 

4.  Lavalard  found  that  omnibus  and  hack  horses  needed  1.45  pounds  digestible 

protein  plus  10.4  pounds  digestible  carbohydrates;  nutritive  ratio  of 
1 :  7  per  1,000  pounds  live  weight. 

5.  A  few  of  Wolff's  conclusions  may  be  mentioned  (1876-85). ' 

(a)  For  maintenance  of  a  1,100-pound  horse  on  hay  alone,  23.1  pounds  were 
required  containing  1.26  pounds  of  digestible  protein  and  9.25  pounds 
of  total  digestible  organic  nutrients,  with  a  nutritive  ratio  of  1:  6.3. 

(6)  An  average  day's  work  for  a  farm  or  draft  horse  of  1,100  pounds,  in  good 
condition,  is  2,000,000  kilogrammeters,  which  requires  5.09  pounds 
of  digestible  nutrients  plus  9.25  pounds  for  maintenance,  or  a  total 
of  14.34  pounds  containing  1.90  pounds  protein  and  having  a  ratio 
of  1:6.6. 

(c)  When  fed  an  average  quantity  of  hay  exclusively,  a  1,100-pound  horse 

cannot  take  over  26.4  pounds,  and  can  do  but  little  work  on  such  a 
diet.  The  addition  of  some  clover  hay  enables  the  horse  to  do  about 
one-fourth  of  a  day's  work,  while  if  given  a  full  diet  of  alfalfa,  26 
pounds,  the  horse  is  able  to  do  fully  one-half  an  average  day's  work. 

(d)  The  ordinary  food  for  the  work  horse  is  like  amounts  of  hay  and  oats  (13 

pounds  of  hay  and  13  pounds  of  oats  for  a  1,100-pound  horse).  The 
proportions  of  each  can  be  varied,  depending  upon  the  amount  of  the 
work  required. 

(e)  The  carbohydrates  furnish  the  chief  source  of  heat  and  energy  for  the 

horse. 

(/)  One  kilo  of  oats  (2.2  pounds)  added  to  a  work  ration  enabled  the  horse  to 
do  substantially  530,400  kilogrammeters  more  of  work,  and  1  kilo  of 
maize,  700,000  kilogrammeters.  Maize  proved  a  very  satisfactory 
food  to  improve  the  weight  and  appearance  of  the  horse. 

(g)  The  horse  bean  when  fed  in  an  amount  not  exceeding  2  pounds  daily 
proved  quite  satisfactory  as  a  source  of  increased  protein  in  the  ration, 
but  as  a  source  of  energy  it  hardly  equaled  oats. 


1  Grundlagen  f.  d.  rationelle  Futterung  des  Pferdes,  1886. 


THE   NUTRITION   OF   THE   HORSE.  245 

The  above  results  and  others  that  could  be  cited  were  based  largely 
upon  digestible  nutrients  in  the  foods  fed  and  their  relation  to  work  per- 
formed, and  did  not  take  into  consideration  the  energy  expended  in  digest- 
ing the  different  kinds  of  feeds  resulting  in  the  loss  of  varying  amounts 
of  heat,  nor  the  heat  radiation  resulting  from  the  increased  metabolism 
caused  by  certain  feedstuffs. 

B.    Recent  Investigations  and  the  Application  of  Calorimetbt. 

The  development  and  application  of  calorimetry,  and  its  use  in  studying 
the  intake  and  outgo  of  energy,  has  proved  of  great  help  in  increasing  our 
knowledge  of  the  principles  of  nutrition  and  the  nutritive  value  of  animal 
feeds.  The  following  calorimetric  units  and  methods  are  employed  in 
measuring  the  utilization  of  energy :  — 

(a)  The  Calorie.  —  The  heat  which  is  given  off  by  a  food  when  combined 
with  or  burned  in  oxygen  is  the  measiu-e  of  its  total  energy.  The  unit  of 
■energy  is  termed  the  calorie,  and  represents  the  amount  of  heat  required 
to  raise  1  kilogram  of  water  1°  C.  (Armsby  has  recently  introduced  the 
term  therm,  or  larger  unit,  meaning  the  amount  of  heat  necessary  to  raise 
1,000  kilograms  of  water  1°  C.)  According  to  Stohman,  Berthelot  and 
Ilubner  the  heat  units,  or  number  of  calories,  in  1  gram  of  protein  or  car- 
bohydrates are  4.1,  and  in  fat,  9.3,  and  the  total  energy  of  a  food  is  the 
amounts  of  protein  and  carbohydrates  multiplied  by  4.1,  and  of  fat  mul- 
tiplied by  9.3. 

(6)  The  Kilogr ammeter.  —  This  represents  the  mechanical  equivalent  of 
a  definite  amount  of  heat,  and  is  equal  to  the  energy  required  to  raise  1 
kilogram  of  water  1  meter  high. 

A  calorie  of  heat  is  equivalent  in  mechanical  energy  to  that  required  to 
raise  427  kilograms  1  meter  high  (or  427  kilogramme ters),  and  this  unit 
is  called  kilogram-calorie. 

To  convert  digestible  protein,  carbohydrates  and  fat  into  kilogram- 
meters,  multiply  the  grams  of  protein  or  carbohydrates  by  4.1,  and  the 
fat  by  9.3,  and  these  products  by  427. 

(c)  The  Respiratory  Quotient.  —  The  relation  of  the  oxygen  consumed 
to  the  carbon  dioxide  given  off  has  been  termed  by  Pfliiger  the  respiratory 
quotient,  and  is  determined  by  dividing  the  volume  of  the  carbon  dioxide 
by  the  volume  of  oxygen. 

In  case  of  carbohydrates,  glycogen,  starch  and  sugar,  the  coefficient  is 
equal  to  1;  in  case  of  albuminoids,  .729;  ^  of  fat,  .700;  and  of  alcohol,  .666. 

An  animal  in  a  state  of  repose  consumes  a  definite  amount  of  oxygen 
in  the  breaking  up  or  burning  of  the  food,  and  gives  off  a  definite  amount 
of  carbon  dioxide,  the  measurement  of  which  forms  a  basis  for  the  food 
required  for  maintenance.  The  consumption  of  oxygen  and  the  exhala- 
tion of  carbon  dioxide  are  rapidly  increased  the  moment  any  work  is  per- 
formed.   This  method  has  been  used  with  the  horse  by  introducing  tubes 

*  After  Lavalard,  already  cited,  p.  123;  according  to  Kellner,  p.  75,  .765. 


246       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    188. 

into  the  trachea  and  measuring  at  intervals  the  intake  and  outgo  of  the 
respiratory  gases. 

(d)  The  Respiration  Calorimeter.  —  The  apparatus  consists  of  an  air- 
tight room  in  which  the  animal  is  placed  for  different  periods  of  time,  and, 
in  addition  to  collecting  the  feces  and  urine,  the  carbon  dioxide  exhaled 
and  the  heat  radiated  are  accurately  measured.  It  has  been  employed 
particularly  in  nutrition  experiments  with  man,  neat  cattle,  dogs  and  even 
smaller  animals. 

An  illustration  of  the  value  of  the  calorimetric  method  over  chemical  an- 
alysis and  digestibility  may  be  cited  in  the  experiment  conducted  by  Wolff, 
who  found  that  a  horse  weighing  500  kilograms  (1,100  pounds)  required 
6  kilos  of  oats  and  6  kilos  of  hay,  equivalent  to  5,547  grams  of  digestible 
organic  nutrients  (minus  fiber),  to  keep  him  in  a  state  of  maintenance  and 
to  enable  him  to  perform  1,450,000  kilogrammeters  of  work.  Of  these 
nutrients  3,551  grams  were  necessary  for  maintenance,  leaving  1,996  grams 
available  for  work.  This  amount  —  1,996  grams  —  is  equivalent  to 
3,478,030  kilogrammeters  of  work  (1,996  multiplied  by  4.1  calories  equals 
81,836  calories,  which,  multiplied  by  425,  equals  3,478,030),  whereas  the 
work  actually  performed  was  1,450,000  kilogrammeters,  or  41.7  per  cent. 
Even  this  percentage  was  found  by  other  experimenters  to  be  too  high, 
and  is  explained  on  the  ground  that  the  horse  was  particularly  accustomed 
to  such  work.  Ziintz  and  Lehmann,  by  the  use  of  the  respiratory  quotient, 
found  that  the  percentage  of  similar  work  in  relation  to  digestible  nutrients 
was  reduced  to  26  per  cent.,  and  Laulonie,  by  the  same  method,  secured 
22  per  cent.  In  other  words,  after  the  maintenance  requirement  is  satis- 
fied, the  horse  seems  to  be  able  to  make  use  of  about  25  per  cent,  of  the 
remaining  energy  in  the  form  of  a  definite  kind  of  work  (net  efficiency  of 
the  animal,  Armsby). 

It  has  been  found  further  by  Ziintz  and  Hagermann,  in  an  extended 
series  of  experiments,  that  the  net  efficiency  of  food  in  case  of  the  horse 
varies  widely,  depending  upon  the  character  of  the  work  performed.  Thus, 
in  case  of  walking  without  a  load,  the  average  efficiency  was  35  per  cent.; 
in  different  grades  of  ascent,  at  a  walk  without  a  load,  from  33.7  to  36.2  per 
cent.;  and  with  a  load,  22.7  per  cent.  In  case  of  work  at  a  slow  trot  with- 
out a  load  the  net  efficiency  was  31.96  per  cent.,  and  with  a  load,  from  23.4 
to  31.7  pet"  cent.  On  the  basis  of  these  studies  formulas  have  been  worked 
out  for  the  amount  of  food  required  for  definite  kinds  of  work,  but  it  is 
hardly  practicable  to  employ  them  under  conditions  ordinarily  prevailing. 

By  this  method  of  procedure  Ziintz  has  determined  the  net  energy  value 
of  a  number  of  foods  for  the  horse,  and  the  results  have  led  to  a  reduction 
in  the  amount  of  coarse  food  supplied,  and  an  increase  in  the  amount  of 
concentrates,  thus  requiring  the  animal  to  expend  less  energy  in  mastica- 
tion and  digestion,  and  to  care  for  less  inert  matter  in  the  intestinal  tract. 
A  former  ration  for  the  bus  horses  of  Paris,  composed  of  oats,  corn,  beans, 
bran,  hay  and  straw,  contained  18.5  kilos  of  dry  matter,  while  a  ration 
based  on  the  results  of  recent  investigations,  composed  of  oats,  corn,  beans. 


THE    NUTRITION   OF   THE   HORSE. 


247 


molasses  and  chopped  straw,  contained  only  12.5  kilos  of  dry  matter,  and 
proved  to  be  less  cumbersome,  furnished  a  like  amount  of  energy,  caused 
less  digestion  disturbances  and  was  more  economical, 

C.    Summary  of  Investigations, 

The  many  investigations  made,  some  of  which  have  been  mentioned, 
have  led  to  a  number  of  important  practical  deductions  concerning  the 
nutrition  of  the  horse  which  are  stated  below. 

1.  Horses  need  a  definite  amount  of  nutrients  per  1,000  pounds  of  live 
weight  for  maintenance,  and  an  extra  quantity  for  work.  This  amount 
depends  upon  the  size  and  temperament  of  the  horse  and  the  character 
and  extent  of  the  work  performed. 

2.  In  addition  to  the  data  already  presented,  the  following  recent  state- 
ments by  Kellner  and  Armsby  concerning  the  nutrients  and  energy  re- 
quirements of  the  horse  are  worthy  of  especial  mention :  — 


Far  Horses  of  1,000  Pounds'  Live  Weight  {Kellner). 


Light  Work. 


Medium 
Work. 


Hard  Work. 


Dry  matter  (pounds), 

Protein, 

Pat,    .        .        ... 

Carbohydrates,  . 

Total  (fat  X  2.2), 

Starch  equivalent. 


18-23 

1.0 

.4 

9.8 

11.7 

9.2 


21-26 

1.4 

.6 

11.3 

14.0 

11.6 


23-28 

2.0 

.8 

13.7 

17.5 

15.0 


For  Horses  of  1,000  Pounds'  Live  Weight  (Armsby). 


Light  Work 
(2  Hours). 


Medium 

Work 
(4  Hours). 


Hard  Work 
(8  Hours). 


Digestible  protein. 
Net  energy  (therms). 


1.0 
7.6 


1.4 
11.1 


2.0 
18.2 


Armsby  adopts  Kellner's  protein  standards  and  substitutes  therms  of 
energy  for  the  customary  fat  and  carbohydrates,  or  starch  equivalent.  He 
bases  his  knowledge  of  therms  of  net  energy  in  feeding  stuffs  ^  utilized  by 
horses  largely  on  the  work  done  by  Ziintz  and  Hagermarm.  The  feeding 
stuffs  used  by  these  experimenters  were  comparatively  few  in  number, 

3,  Fat  should  not  be  supplied  to  horses  to  a  greater  extent  than  is 
recommended  for  dairy  animals,  and  1  pound  per  1,000  pounds  of  live 
weight  should  be  regarded  as  the  extreme  amount. 


1  The  Nutrition  of  Farm  Animals,  by  H.  P.  Armsby,  p.  721. 


248       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   ^TATION   BULLETIN    188. 

4.  The  proportion  which  the  protein  of  the  food  should  bear  to  the  car- 
bohydrates and  fat  (nutritive  ratio)  has  been  a  matter  of  considerable 
study  and  dispute.  The  International  Congress  of  Nutrition  ^  in  1900  dis- 
cussed the  matter  and  concluded  that  a  relation  of  1 : 6  to  1 : 7  was  the  most 
suitable.  Lavalard  ^  states,  as  a  result  of  his  experiments,  that  1 : 6  to  1:9 
are  permissible  and  satisfactory.  Kellner^  states  that  for  horses  doing 
work  at  a  walk  a  ratio  of  1 :  10  is  allowable,  but  that  for  hard  work,  and 
especially  work  done  at  a  trot,  a  ratio  of  1:  7  is  preferable,  because  in  such 
cases  extra  protein  is  needed  to  furnish  maximum  amounts  of  blood  in 
order  to  carry  the  oxygen  required  for  the  rapid  breaking  down  of  the  food 
material. 

5.  Experience  has  taught  feeders,  especially  in  European  countries, 
that  it  is  advisable  to  crush  the  coarse  grains  before  feeding,  and  to  cut 
the  roughage  and  make  a  mixture  of  the  two.  The  cut  roughage  aids  in 
absorbing  any  moist  feeds,  particularly  molasses,  and  also  serves  as  a 
distributor  of  the  heavy  concentrates. 

6.  French  investigators  have  reconunended  the  substituting  of  corn, 
barley,  rye,  oil  cakes,  sugar  and  molasses  for  oats,  and  the  reducing  of  the 
coarse  fodders  to  a  minimum,  particularly  for  hard-worked  horses,  —  as 
low  in  some  cases  as  6  pounds  daily  per  1,000  pounds  live  weight. 

7.  Cut  straw  has  been  highly  recommended  in  place  of  hay  because  it 
is  cheaper,  is  less  likely  to  cause  colic,  contains  less  foreign  material  than 
hay,  and  serves  as  an  excellent  medium  for  the  distribution  of  the  grain. 

8.  A  mixture  which  the  French  authority,  Lavalard,  recpmmends  con- 
sists of  8  pounds  of  oats,  9  pounds  of  corn,  1  pound  of  beans,  5  pounds  of 
molassine  meal,  and  7  pounds  of  chopped  straw.  This  mixture  contains, 
of  digestible  nutrients,  1.7  pounds  protein,  .47  pound  fat,  11.52  pounds 
carbohydrates,  27.5  pounds  total  dry  matter,  and  27,712  calories  of  energy 
and  is  sufficient  for  hard-worked  horses  of  1,100  pounds  weight. 

9.  For  roughage  the  coarser  hays,  including  alfalfa  and  clover,  are  recom- 
mended, also  oat,  wheat  and  barley  straws. 

10.  Kellner  recommends  also  as  satisfactory  concentrates,  in  addition 
to  the  cereals  (excepting  wheat),  linseed,  cocoanut  and  palm  nut  meal  in 
amounts  not  exceeding  1  to  2  pounds  daily.  He  states  that  corn,  small 
amounts  of  brewers'  grains,  rice  and  linseed  meals  can  be  used  in  order 
to  reduce  the  amount  of  oats  to  a  minimum. 

11.  In  the  United  States  relatively  large  amounts  of  corn  are  fed,  while 
on  the  Pacific  coast  barley  of  good  quality  predominates.  In  the  semi- 
arid  regions  Kaffir  corn  and  alfalfa  have  been  used  satisfactorily,  particu- 
larly the  latter. 

12.  The  amount  of  water  required  daily  depends  upon  the  size  of  the 
animal,  the  work  performed,  and  the  time  of  year.  The  time  of  watering 
—  whether  before  or  after  feeding  —  is  a  matter  of  minor  importance. 
Horses  become  accustomed  to  both  methods,  and  care  should  be  taken 
to  avoid  sudden  changes  from  the  accustomed  method. 

1  L' Alimentation  du  Cheval,  pp.  100,  101 

»  Die  Ernahrxing  d.  landw.  NQtzthiere,  Sechste  Auflage,  p.  455. 


THE    NUTRITION   OF   THE   HORSE.  249 

13.  Horses  are,  as  a  rule,  of  a  nervous  temperament,  and  it  is  advisable 
to  avoid  anything  that  will  prove  a -source  of  irritation  to  the  intestines, 
and  that  will  induce  extra  water  consumption.  Inferior  fodder,  especially 
moldy  stuff,  should  never  be  fed. 

D.    Books  on  Horse  Nutrition. 

The  Nutrition  of  Farm  Animals,  Armsby.      Chapter  XIV.      Published   by  the 

Macmillan  Company,  New  York,  1917. 
The  Productive  Feeding  of  Farm  Animals,  Woll.    Chapter  XXIV.    Published  by 

J.  B.  Lippincott  Companj%  Philadelphia,  1915. 
Productive  Horse  Husbandry,  Gay.     Published    by  J.  B.  Lippincott   Company, 

Philadelphia,  1914. 
Feeds  and  Feeding,  Henry  &  Morrison.    Chapters  XVIII,  XIX,  XX.    Published  by 

the  Henry  &  Morrison  Company,  Madison,  Wis.,  1915. 
A  Digest  of  Recent  Experiments  on  Horse  Feeding,  Langworthy.     United  States 

Department  of  Agriculture,  Office  of  Experiment  Stations,  Bulletin  No.  125,  1903. 
Die  Ernahrung  d.  Landw.  Niitzthiere,  Kellner,  Sixth  Edition,  Part  III,  Chapter  V. 

Published  by  Paul  Paray,  Berlin,  1912. 
Grundlagen  f .  d.  rationelle  FUtterung  des  Pferdes,  Wolff.    Published  by  Paul  Paray, 

Berlin,  1886. 
L'Alimentation  du  Cheval,  Lavalard.    Published  at  Librarie  Agricole  de  la  Maison 

Rustique,  Paris,  1912. 
Le  Cheval,  Lavalard.    Published  by  Librarie  De  Firmin  Didot  et  Cie,  Paris,  1888. 
Les  Aliments  du  Cheval,  Duchambre  et  Curot.    Published  by  Asselin  et  Houzeau, 

Paris,  1903. 


250       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    188. 


Part  II. 


FEEDING  TRIALS  WITH  HORSES. 

Results  and  Suggestions. 

(a)     Alfalfa  for  Horses. 

1.  On  the  basis  of  1,000  pounds'  live  weight,  a  ration  composed  of  1.7 
pounds  of  oats,  6.8  pounds  of  corn  and  8.5  pounds  of  alfalfa  hay  did  not 
prove  sufficient  for  horses  doing  reasonably  hard  farm  work  (Kansas 
ration). 

2.  Fed  such  a  ration  the  horses  appeared  quite  restless  and  nervous, 
and  lost  in  live  weight,  indicating  insufficient  food  and  possibly  an  unfavor- 
able action  of  the  alfalfa  upon  the  nervous  system, 

3.  An  increase  of  10  per  cent,  in  the  above  ration  checked  the  loss  of 
live  weight,  but  not  the  restless,  hungry  condition. 

4.  The  substitution  of  a  timothy  hay  mixture  for  a  portion  of  the  al- 
falfa seemed  to  check  in  a  measure  the  restless  condition  of  the  horses. 

5.  During  the  fall  months  the  same  grain  ration  was  maintained,  but 
timothy  hay  was  substituted  for  all  of  the  alfalfa.  The  horses  fully  main- 
tained their  weights  and  appeared  quieter  than  when  the  alfalfa  ration 
was  fed.  This  may  have  been  due  in  part,  at  least,  to  the  fact  that  less 
work  was  required  daily  than  in  the  early  part  of  the  season. 

6.  A  combination  of  one-fifth  oats  and  four-iifths  corn,  together  with 
a  mixture  of  one-half  alfalfa  and  one-half  timothy,  is  likely  to  prove  more 
satisfactory  than  a  ration  in  which  alfalfa  constitutes  the  entire  roughage. 

7.  A  combination  of  one-third  oats  and  two-thirds  corn  and  timothy 
hay  appears  to  be  quite  satisfactory,  and  furnishes  sufficient  protein  for 
horses  doing  ordinary  work.  Only  when  quite  hard  work  is  required  is  it 
necessary  to  increase  the  protein  by  feeding  alfalfa  or  a  small  amount  of 
a  protein  concentrate.  In  such  cases  the  roughage  should  be  reduced  and 
the  amount  of  grain  increased. 

(6)     Brewers'  Dried  Grains  for  Horses. 
Brewers'  grains,  when  prepared  from  perfectly  fresh  material,  may 
constitute  from  15  to  25  per  cent,  of  the  daily  grain  ration  for  horses,  and 
may  replace  a  like  amount  of  oats. 

(c)     Velvet  Bean  Feed  for  Horses. 
1.  Velvet  bean  feed  represents  the  ground  bean  and  pods  of  a  tropical 
legume. 


THE    NUTRITION   OF   THE    HORSE.  251 

2.  At  this  station  a  ration  composed  of  oats,  corn,  wheat  bran  and  20 
per  cent,  velvet  bean  feed  was  fed  to  two  farm  horses  for  a  period  of  three 
months,  and  gave  quite  satisfactory  results. 

3.  Wliile  it  would  be  possible  to  increase  the  amount  of  this  feed  in  the 
mixture,  it  would  hardly  be  advisable  because  the  pods  render  the  feed 
less  digestible  than  corn. 

4.  Some  lots  have  been  found  upon  the  market  more  or  less  moldy,  due 
to  imperfect  drying.  •  Such  material  is  quite  unfit  for  horses.  Care  should 
be  taken  to  feed  only  well-dried,  sweet  material. 

(d)     Linseed  Meal  for  Horses. 

1.  During  a  period  of  two  months  the  horses  received  a  ration  of  oats, 
corn  and  7  per  cent,  linseed  meal.  They  ate  the  mixture  readily  and  ap- 
peared in  excellent  condition  during  the  entire  time. 

2.  It  is  preferable  in  feeding  this  material  to  have  the  other  grains  with 
which  it  is  mixed  at  least  coarsely  ground,  otherwise  the  linseed  meal 
separates  out  and  is  not  likely  to  be  eaten  as  readily.  The  addition  of  5 
to  7  per  cent,  of  linseed  meal  to  the  grain  ration  for  hard- worked  horses 
should  prove  very  helpful. 


(e)  Rations  for  Work  Horses. 
The  amount  of  roughage  fed  may  vary  between  1  and  IJ  pounds  daily 
per  100  pounds'  live  weight.  Alfalfa  may  constitute  one-half  of  the 
roughage.  The  amount  of  grain  to  be  fed  will  depend,  naturally,  upon 
the  character  and  amount  of  the  work  performed.  From  1  to  1.4  pounds 
daily  per  100  pounds  of  live  weight  should  prove  sufficient  under  most 
conditions. 

I.  IV.  • 

100  pounds  of  oats.  125  pounds  of  brewers'  dried  grains. 

400  pounds  of  corn.  100  pounds  of  oats. 

5  hay  and  i  alfalfa.  225  pounds  of  corn. 

50  pounds  of  wheat  bran. 

Timothy  or  mixed  hay. 
II. 
100  pounds  of  oats.  *  • 

200  pounds  of  corn.  100  pounds  of  velvet  bean  feed. 

Timothy  or  mixed  hay.  150  pounds  of  oats. 

200  pounds  of  corn. 

50  pounds  of  wheat  bran. 
III.  Timothy  or  mixed  hay. 

100  pounds  of  brewers'  dried  grains. 

150  pounds  of  oats.  *^I- 

200  pounds  of  corn.  100  pounds  of  oats. 

50  pounds  of  wheat  bran.  180  pounds  of  corn. 

Timothy  or  mixed  hay.  20  pounds  of  linseed  meal. 

Timothy  or  mixed  hay. 


252       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    188. 

Hominy  meal  or  crushed  barley  may  be  fed  in  place  of  one-half  of  the 
cracked  or  whole  corn  if  desired.  Molasses  may  constitute  10  per  cent, 
of  the  grain  mixture.  It  may  be  diluted  somewhat  with  water  and  mixed 
with  the  grain.  It  aids  in  preventing  colic.  Inferior  hay  —  weedy  or 
moldy  —  and  musty  grain  are  to  be  avoided  as  causes  of  digestion  dis- 
turbances, 

A.    Alfalfa  for  Horses. 

The  Kansas  Experiment  Station/  co-operating  with  the  United  States 
Department  of  Agriculture,  conducted  a  series  of  experiments  in  the  feeding 
of  work  horses,  using  the  artillery  horses  at  Fort  Riley  (937  in  all),  with 
an  average  weight  of  1,165  pounds.  The  work  performed  was  called  rapid 
light  draft,  and  consisted  of  marching  and  drilling,  drawing  heavy  wagons 
and  guns  often  at  a  trot  or  gallop.  Among  the  many  rations  tried  was  one 
composed,  on  the  basis  of  1,000  pounds  of  live  weight,  of  6.8  pounds  of 
corn,  1.7  pounds  of  oats  and  8.5  pounds  of  alfalfa  hay,  which  contained, 
according  to  calculations  made  by  the  experimenters,  the  following  di- 
gestible nutrients :  — 


Kansas  Ration. 

Protein,     .... 

.       1 . 655 

Carbohydrates, 

8.720 

Fat,            .... 

.408 

Total  (fat  X  2.2), 

.     11.270 

Nutritive  ratio, 

.  1:5.800 

The  aKalfa  experiment  was  conducted  with  17  horses  for  one  hundred 
and  forty  days,  and  during  the  test  the  horses  showed  an  average  gain  of 
25.6  pounds  per  head.  It  was  stated  that  they  showed  no  signs  of  short- 
ness of  wind,  softness,  lack  of  endurance,  laxative  effect  or  excessive 
urination.  The  amount  of  grain  was  reduced  19  per  cent,  and  the 
amount  of  hay  30  per  cent,  from  that  consumed  in  a  check  ration  of 
prairie  hay  and  oats.  The  observers  explain  the  satisfactory  results  on 
the  ground  that  a  small  amount  of  alfalfa  hay  was  fed  with  a  relatively 
large  amount  of  corn,  a  combination  requiring  a  minimum  amount  of 
energy  for  its  digestion. 

The  1,000-pound  horse,  working  eight  hours  daily,  requires,  according 
to  Armsby  et  als.,"^  2  pounds  of  digestible  crude  protein  and  18.2  therms  of 
net  energy.  The  horses  in  the  Kansas  alfalfa  ration  received  1.67  pounds 
of  digestible  crude  protein  and  13.41  therms  of  net  energy. 

On  the  basis  of  digestible  matter  the  following  comparison  can  be  made 
of  nutrients  required  per  1,000  pounds'  live  weight  for  medium  to  hard 
work:  — 

'  Bui.  No.  186. 

'  The  Nutrition  of  Farm  Animals,  p.  711. 


THE    NUTRITION    OF   THE   HORSE. 


253 


Authority.                          Protein. 

Carbo-           -p^, 
hydrates.         ^''*- 

Total 

(Fat  X  2.2). 

Nutritive 
Ratio. 

Alfalfa  ration, 

Lavalard's  standard  for  comparison, 
Grandeau's  standard  for  comparison, 
Kellner's  standard  for  comparison,  *  . 
Kellner's  standard  for  comparison,  2  . 

1.655 
1.330 
1.920 
1.600 
2.170 

8.721 
11.170 
10.920 
12.500 
13.700 

.408 

.400 
.600 
.800 

11.26 
12.50 
12.83 
14.20 
15.87 

1  :5.8 
1  :8.3 
1  :5.7 
1  :7.9 
1  :6.3 

1  Medium  work. 


2  Hard  work. 


It  appears  that  while  the  Kansas  ration  contained  ample  protein  on 
the  basis  of  accepted  standards,  it  was  deficient  in  total  digestible  nutri- 
ents and  in  therms  of  net  energy.  It  seems  to  have  been  successful  for 
the  army  horses  doing  the  regular  work  required  of  them,  but  it  is  doubt- 
ful to  the  wTiter  if  it  would  prove  sufficient  in  amount  for  horses  doing 
medium  to  hard  farm  work. 


Experimental. 
In  order  to  test  the  efficiency  of  this  ration,  two  young  western  horses 
designated  as  Tom  and  Joe,  which  were  purchased  the  winter  previous, 
and  which  had  been  doing  farm  work  during  the  spring  and  summer,  were 
placed,  Sept.  11,  1916,  on  the  Kansas  ration.  Tom  received  2f  pounds  of 
oats,  9|  pounds  of  cracked  corn  and  12  pounds  of  alfalfa  hay,  and  Joe 
received  2\  pounds  of  oats,  9  pounds  of  cracked  corn  and  11  pounds  of 
alfalfa.  The  hay  fed  for  the  first  three  weeks  was  grown  upon  the  station 
grounds,  Vv^as  fine,  but  mixed  with  more  or  less  foreign  grasses.  On  Octo- 
ber 6  it  was  replaced  with  a  coarser  but  better  grade,  this  second  cutting 
said  to  have  been  grown  in  Michigan.  The  ration  was  fed  in  three  por- 
tions daily,  and  the  horses  weighed  on  each  Monday  morning  before  feed- 
ing and  watering. 

Weights. 


Tom. 


Joe. 


September  17, 
September  24, 
October  1,  . 
October  8,  . 
October  15,  . 
October  22,  . 
October  29,  . 
November  6, 
November  13, 


1,415 

1,305 

1,415 

1,295 

1,415 

1,29Q 

1.425 

1,285 

1,405 

1.285 

1,410 

1,285 

1,400 

1,280 

1,415 

1,310 

1,425 

1.335 

254       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    188. 


Although,  as  has  been  previously  shown,  this  ration  was  deficient  in 
both  total  digestible  nutrients  and  therms  of  net  energy,  the  horses  held 
their  weights,  due  in  all  probability  to  the  light  work  performed  during 
the  autumn  months.  They  appeared  hungry  and  very  restless,  the  latter 
condition,  in  the  opinion  of  the  writer,  being  in  part  at  least,  a  result  of 
the  influence  of  the  alfalfa  upon  the  nervous  system. 

Beginning  in  the  spring  of  1917  the  two  horses  which  had  been  used  on 
digestion  experiments  the  preceding  winter  were  worked  on  the  farm  and 
fed  the  Kansas  alfalfa  ration.  On  the  basis  of  live  weight  Tom  received 
daily  2f  pounds  of  oats,  10|  pounds  of  cracked  corn  and  12  pounds  of  al- 
falfa, and  Joe  received  2|  pounds  of  oats,  9  pounds,  14'  ounces  of  corn  and 
11  pounds  of  alfalfa. 

Weights. 


Tom. 


Joe. 


April  23, 
April  30, 
May  7, 
May  14, 
May  21, 
May  28, 
June  4, 


1,390 

1,310 

1,390 

1,280 

1,390 

1,290 

1,400 

1,295 

1,380 

1,285 

1,370 

1,275 

1,370 

1,260 

It  was  necessary  to  work  them  lightly  during  the  first  month.  As  the 
work  was  increased  in  amount  they  began  to  show  a  gradual  loss  in  weight 
and  to  appear  very  nervous  and  hungry.  Because  of  such  conditions,  and 
of  the  additional  spring  work  required  of  them,  the  ration  was  increased 
10  per  cent.  June  4,  Tom  receiving  13.2  pounds  of  alfalfa,  3  pounds  of  oats 
and  11.5  pounds  of  corn,  and  Joe  receiving  12.1  pounds  of  alfalfa,  2.7 
pound  of  oats  and  10.9  pounds  of  corn. 


Weights. 


Tom. 


Joe. 


June  11, 
June  18, 
June  25, 
July  2, 
July  9, 
July  16, 


1,390 

1,275 

1,400 

1,280 

1,400 

1,275 

1,410 

1,270 

1,420 

1,270 

1,430 

1.300 

THE    NUTRITION   OF   THE   HORSE. 


255 


These  rations  contained  the  following  pounds  of  digestible  nutrients 
and  therms  of  net  energy :  — 


Protein. 

Carbo- 
hydrates. 

Fat. 

Total 
(Fat  X  2.2). 

Therms. 

Fed. 

Required. 

Tom,        .... 
Joe,          .... 
Grandeau  standard. 

2.56 
2.37 
2.69 

14.02 
13.05 

.59 
.54 

17.80 
16.60 
17.96 

22.21 
20.72 

25.48 
23.66 

In  so  far  as  weights  and  digestible  nutrients  were  concerned,  the  horses 
appeared  to  have  received  sufficient  food  for  the  work  they  were  doing. 
The  therms  fed  fell  below  the  standard  theoretically  required,  which  leads 
one  to  question  whether  this  standard  is  not  too  high.  The  horses  still 
appeared  rather  restless  and  hungry,  although  they  performed  their  daily 
task  in  a  more  satisfactory  way.  Beginning  July  16  the  ration  was  modi- 
fied by  reducing  the  amount  of  alfalfa  fed  daily  to  each  horse  to  10  pounds, 
and  adding  6  pounds  of  timothy  mixture  to  Tom's  ration  and  5  pounds  to 
Joe's  ration,  the  grain  remaining  as  in  the  ration  preceding.  The  object 
of  the  change  was  to  attempt  to  reduce  the  restless  action  manifested  by 
the  horses,  which  in  a  measure  was  successful,  and  their  weights  were 
maintained. 

Weights. 


Tom. 


Joe. 


July  16, 

July  23, 
July  30, 
August  6, 
August  13,    . 
August  20,    . 
August  27,     . 
September  3, 


1,430 

1,300 

1,430 

1,300 

1,415 

1,270 

1,410 

1,270 

1,410 

1,280 

1,420 

1,300 

1,410 

1,270 

1,410 

1,300 

Beginning  September  4,  hay  was  substituted  for  the  entire  amount  of 
alfalfa,  the  grain  ration  remaining  constant.  The  calculated  digestible 
nutrients  and  weights  of  the  horses  follow:  — 


256       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    188. 


1 

cm' 

X 

d 

1 

Thebms. 

E 

In 

o 

1 

i 

■a 
'3 

Tom, 

1.87 

2.85 

13.36 

.52 

19.22 

1  :9.3 

20.00 

25.48 

Joe,     ..... 

1.70 

2.66 

12.55 

.47 

17.94 

1  :9.5 

18.80 

23.66 

Grandeau's  standard  (1,400- 
pound  horse). 

Lavalard's  standard  (1,400- 
pound  horse). 

2.69 
1.86 

- 

- 

17.96 
17.20 

- 

- 

- 

TFez^Ais. 


Joe. 


September  10, 
September  17, 
September  24, 
October  1,    . 
October  8,    . 
October  15,  . 
October  22,  . 
October  29,  . 


1,300 
1,310 
1,275 
1,290 
1,300 
1,330 
1,320 
1,295 


The  weights  were  well  maintained,  indicating  that  for  the  work  per- 
formed sufficient  nutriment  was  being  supplied.  The  work  was  rather 
irregular  during  this  period,  and  may  be  considered  as  light. 

The  combination  of  hay,  corn  and  oats  evidently  was  sufficient  in  total 
digestible  nutrients,  but  rather  deficient  in  protein,  according  to  Grandeau, 
for  horses  doing  moderate  work.  The  therms  of  energy  were  noticeably 
below  the  standard.  The  ration  conformed  more  closely  to  that  set  by 
Lavalard,  who  accepts  one  with  less  protein  and  a  wider  nutritive  ratio 
than  other  investigators.  It  is  well  known  that  horses  keep  in  good  con- 
dition and  do  satisfactory  work  on  rations  composed  of  hay,  corn  and  oats. 
It  seems  probable,  therefore,  that  only  in  case  of  quite  hard  work  is  it 
desirable  to  increase  the  protein  requirement  above  the  amount  furnished 
by  such  a  combination.  Less  corn  and  more  oats,  i.e.,  rather  more  pro- 
tein and  less  starch,  or  a  somewhat  narrower  ration,  is  desirable  in  the 
warm  summer  months. 

While  recognizing  the  large  number  of  horses  in  the  Kansas  experiment 
and  the  satisfactory  results  secured,  on  the  basis  of  our  own  observations 
and  the  accepted  feeding  standards  it  seems  to  the  writer  that  the  amounts 
of  the  several  feeds  are  not  likely  to  be  sufficient,  nor  the  combination 


THE   NUTRITION   OF   THE    HORSE. 


257 


particularly  satisfactory,  for  most  work  horses.  It  is  believed  that  for 
each  100  pounds  of  live  weight  a  pound  of  roughage  is  a  reasonable  allow- 
ance, and  that  one-half  of  this  roughage  may  consist  to  good  advantage 
of  alfalfa,  and  the  balance  of  a  timothy  mixture. 

B.    Brewers'  Dried  Gr.'^ixs  for  Horses. 

Brewers'  dried  grains,  the  residue  of  the  beer  breweries,  contain  from 
20  to  28  per  cent,  of  protein,  13  to  17  per  cent,  of  fiber,  5  to  7  per  cent, 
of  fat,  and  from  40  to  46  per  cent,  of  extract  matter.  They  contain  more 
protein,  fat  and  fibre  than  oats,  some  14  to  20  per  cent,  less  extract  mat- 
ter, and  possess  about  15  per  cent,  less  net  energy  value.  Voorhees  ^  of 
the  New  Jersey  station,  as  a  result  of  feeding  trials,  stated,  "  That  on  the 
whole  a  pound  of  dried  brewers'  grains  was  quite  as  useful  as  a  pound  of 
oats  in  a  ration  for  work  horses."  Foreign  investigators  have  stated  that 
they  can  replace  one-half  of  the  oat  ration.  In  New  England,  while  they 
have  been  used  more  or  less,  one  fails  to  learn  of  their  general  employ- 
ment as  a  part  of  the  daily  ration.  If  used  especially  for  horses,  it  is  quite 
important  that  they  be  dried  before  being  allowed  to  sour  or  decompose. 

This  station  has  fed  them  as  a  component  of  horse  rations  with  satis- 
factory results.  The  same  two  horses  that  were  used  in  the  alfalfa  experi- 
ment were  employed.  They  did  moderate  farm  work  which  consisted 
principally  of  plowing,  harrowing  and  teaming. 

Ration  I. 
5  pounds  of  ground  oats. 
3  pounds  of  brewers'  grains. 
8  pounds  of  cracked  corn. 
2  pounds  of  wheat  bran. 
15  pounds  of  timothy  mixture. 

The  ration  contained  the  following  digestible  nutrients  in  pounds  and 
net  energy  value  in  therms  on  the  basis  of  1,000  pounds  of  live  weight:  — 


Atjthoritt. 

Protein. 

Total 
(Fat  X  2.2). 

Nutritive 
Ratio. 

Therms. 

Brewers'  dried  grain  ration,     .... 
Kellner's  standard  (moderate  work), 
Lavalard's  standard  (moderate  work),   . 
Grandeau's  standard  (moderate  work), 

1.76 
1.40 
1.33 
1.92 

12.00 
12.62 
12.50 
12.83 

1  :5.9 
1  :8.0 
1  :8.3 
1  :7.9 

15.1 

The  above  comparisons  indicate  that  the  ration  fed  contained  sub- 
stantially sufficient  digestible  protein  and  total  nutrients.  The  horses 
were  weighed  weekly  in  the  morning,  before  feeding  and  watering. 

»  Bui.  No.  92,  N.  J.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta. 


258       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION    BULLETIN    188. 


Weights. 


Tom. 


Joe. 


May  22. 
May  29, 
June  5, 
June  12, 
June  19, 


1,400 

1,240 

1,400 

1,280 

1,400 

1,275 

1,425 

1,285 

1,425 

1,290 

It  seemed  evident  that  for  the  work  performed  the  horses  were  receiving 
sufficient  nutrients  to  keep  them  in  normal  condition,  although  they  did 
not  materially  add  to  their  weight. 

Ration  II. 
On  June  19  the  ration  was  modified  slightly  by  replacing  2  pounds  of 
the  oats  with  2  pounds  of  the  brewers'  grains,  thus  increasing  the  protein 
slightly,  while  the  total  nutrients  received  were  nearly  the  same. 

Weights. 


Tom. 


Joe. 


June  26, 
July  3, 
July  10, 
July  17. 


1,420 

1,260 

1,415 

1,250 

1,420 

1,240 

1,400 

1,240 

During  this  period  there  seemed  to  be  a  slight  loss  in  weight.  Whether 
this  was  due  to  the  warm  weather  or  to  the  modification  of  the  ration  is 
not  clear. 

Ration  III. 

On  July  17  the  horses  were  put  back  on  to  Ration  I  and  continued 
until  August  14. 

Weights. 


Tom. 


Joe. 


July  24, 

July  31, 
August  7, 
August  14, 


1,420 

1,300 

1,415 

1,270 

1,410 

1,285 

1,405 

1,270 

Slight  shrinkages  in  weight  were  noted. 


THE    NUTRITION    OF   THE   HORSE. 


259 


Ration  IV. 

On  August  14,  because  the  horses  were  doing  somewhat  less  work,  Ra- 
tion I  was  reduced  1  pound  each  of  oats  and  cracked  corn. 

Weights. 


August  21,  . 
August  28,  . 
September  4, 
September  11, 


Joe. 

1,305 
1,310 
1,265 
1,295 


It  will  be  seen  that  the  rations  fed  the  two  horses  from  about  the  middle 
of  May  until  September  11  contained  from  3  to  5  pounds  of  the  brewers' 
grains  out  of  a  total  of  18  pounds  of  grain  (or  from  17  to  28  per  cent.)-  At 
the  beginning  the  horses  weighed  1,400  and  1,240  pounds,  respectively, 
and  at  the  close,  1,435  and  1,295  pounds.  During  this  time  variations  in 
weight  were  noted,  due  perhaps  partly  to  increase  or  decrease  in  work,  and 
partly  to  weather  conditions.  The  horses  kept  in  uniformly  good  condition 
throughout  the  season,  indicating  that  the  brewers'  grains  in  the  amounts 
fed  exerted  no  adverse  effect  upon  them. 

The  writer  is  inclined  to  favor  Rations  I  and  II  as  satisfactory  combina- 
tions, especiallj''  if  the  brewers'  grains  can  be  purchased  for  less  than  the 
oats.  It  is  not  advisable  under  most  conditions  to  include  too  large  an 
amount  of  brewers'  grains  in  the  ration,  for  the  reason  that  they  will  fur- 
nish too  much  protein  and  not  sufficient  digestible  matter. 


C.    Velvet  Bean  Feed  for  Horses. 

The  velvet  bean,  of  which  there  are  many  varieties,  is  a  tropical  legume 
and  is  grown  largely  in  Florida,  Alabama  and  Mississippi.  It  needs  a 
long  season  for  its  maturity  and  is  rarely  grown  north  of  Savannah.  It  is 
a  rank  grower,  the  vines  trailing  on  the  ground  to  a  length  of  from  15  to 
75  feet;  they  are  difficult  to  secure  for  hay,  and  have  been  used  largely 
for  grazing.  It  is  now  more  common  to  pick  the  best  of  the  beans  and  use 
them  without  hulling  for  cattle,  or  hulled  as  a  food  for  pigs.  Machinery 
has  been  devised  for  drying  and  grinding  the  unhuUed  beans,  thus  pro- 
ducing the  velvet  bean  feed,  and  it  is  said  that  the  industry  is  increasing 
rapidly. 


260       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    188. 


Analysis  and  Digestibility  of  Velvet  Bean  Feed  {Bean  and  Hulls). 


Composition.!     ^?^ 


Pounds 

Digestible 

in  2,000. 


Water,    . 
Ash, 
Protein, 
Fiber,     . 
Extract  matter. 
Fat, 

Total,       . 


12.00 
5.11 
16.80 
12.85 
49.00 
4.24 


100.00 


32.7 
252.0 
161.9 
833.0 

68. 7 


1,348.3 


In  chemical  composition  the  feed  does  not  vary  greatly  from  wheat 
bran,  except  that  it  has  rather  more  fiber  derived  from  the  bean  pods.  It 
contains  about  175  pounds  more  digestible  organic  nutrients  per  ton  than 
bran,  and  should  have  a  somewhat  greater  feeding  value. 

The  present  spring  the  experiment  station  fed  it  as  a  component  of  a 
ration  to  the  two  station  horses  which  were  being  used  on  general  farm 
work  and  which  had  been  employed  in  digestion  experiments  the  previous 
winter. 

Ration  I. 

Ration  I,  which  we  began  feeding  in  May,  was  composed  of  a  mixture 


of  — 

Oats, 

Corn, 

Velvet  bean  feed, 

Wheat  bran,   . 


Pounds. 
.  100 
.  160 
.  40 
40 


The  velvet  bean  feed  constituted  11.7  per  cent,  of  the  ration.  The 
horses  ate  the  ration  freely,  Tom  receiving  18  pounds  and  Joe  17  pounds 
daily,  in  addition  to  15  pounds  of  hay. 

Ration  II. 

On  June  8  the  ration  was  modified  bj''  increasing  the  velvet  bean  feed  to 
60  pounds  and  decreasing  the  corn  to  140  pounds  in  the  mixture. 

The  velvet  bean  constituted  nearly  18  per  cent,  of  the  mixture,  and  each 
horse  received  a  little  over  3  pounds  a  day.  The  weights  of  the  horses 
follow :  — 


Tofn. 


Joe. 


June  3, 
June  10, 
June  17, 
June  24, 


1.395 
1,345 
1.370 
1,400 


1,280 
1,245 
1,265 
1,285 


THE    NUTRITION   OF   THE   HORSE. 


261 


During  this  period  these  horses  were  working  eight  to  nine  hours  daily 
for  51  days  each  week,  doing  plowing,  harrowing  and  similar  farm  work. 
They  maintained  their  live  weight,  but  were  not  in  as  good  flesh  as  was 
desired. 

Ration  III. 

On  June  24  the  hay  was  increased  to  18  pounds  daily,  and  so  continued 
until  July  15,  for  the  reason  that  they  acted  rather  hungry,  and  it  was 
thought  a  little  more  bulk  would  render  them  more  contented. 

Weights. 


July  1, 
Julys, 
July  15, 


Joe. 

1,270 
1,300 
1,300 


The  work  during  the  above  time  was  of  about  the  same  character,  but 
on  the  whole  not  as  difficult  as  during  June.  The  live  weight  appeared  to 
be  maintained,  but  apparently  did  not  increase. 

Ration  IV. 
On  July  15  the  grain  mixture  was  increased  to  20  pounds  for  Tom  and 
19  pounds  for  Joe,  in  addition  to  the  18  pounds  of  hay,  and  so  maintained 
until  September  1. 

Weights. 


Tom. 


Joe. 


July  22, 
July  29, 
August  5, 
August  12,    . 
August  19,    . 
August  26,    . 
September  2, 


1,400 

1,300 

1,390 

1.290 

1,410 

1,320 

1,395 

1.320 

1,400 

1,320 

1,405 

1,325 

During  the  above  period  Tom  appeared  stationary  and  Joe  increased 
about  25  pounds  in  weight.  Tom  is  a  long-bodied,  long-legged  horse  and. 
not  as  compact  of  build  as  is  Joe.  In  spite  of  the  fact  that  the  live  weight 
was  not  substantially  increased,  the  horses  appeared  in  better  condition 
than  in  the  early  summer.  The  horses  were  quite  fully  employed  during 
August  in  harrowing,  plowing  and  drawing  manure. 

The  estimated  pounds  of  nutrients  and  therms  of  energy  contained  in 
the  daily  ration  on  the  basis  of  1,400  pounds  live  weight  follow:  — 


262       MASS.    EXPERIMENT   STATION   BULLETIN    188. 


Protein. 


Total 
(Fat  X  2.2). 


Nutri- 
tive 
Ratio. 


Therms 
fed. 


Therms 

needed 

(Armsby). 


Feeds:  — 
15  pounds  hay  +  18  pounds  grain  equals 
18  pounds  hay  +  20  pounds  grain  equals 

Authority:  — 

Kellner's     standard     for     comparison 

(moderate  work). 
Kellner's     standard     for     comparison 

(hard  work). 
Lavalard's    standard    for    comparison 

(moderate  work). 
Grandeau's    standard    for    comparison 

(moderate  work). 


2.43 
2  76 

2.00 
2.80 
1.86 
2.20 


20.37 
23. 37 

17.70 
24.50 
18.10 
17.96 


1  :  7  4 
1  :  7.4 


8.0 
7.7 
8.3 
7.9 


20.40 
23.00 


25.5 
25.5 


It  is  believed  that  15  pounds  of  hay  and  18  pounds  of  grain,  of  which 
velvet  bean  feed  constituted  some  3  pounds,  were  sufficient  for  the  work 
the  horses  did  from  week  to  week.  It  is  possible  that  during  a  few  days, 
or  for  a  week  at  a  time,  the  nutrients  were  not  sufficient.  The  other  ration, 
consisting  of  18  pounds  of  hay  and  20  pounds  of  grain,  probably  was  more 
than  was  needed. 

The  horses  ate  the  ration,  of  which  velvet  bean  feed  comprised  some  18 
per  cent-,  continuously  for  over  three  months,  and  the  results  were  in 
every  way  satisfactory. 


D.    Linseed  Meal  as  a  Grain  Supplement  for  Horses. 

Beginning  September  1  the  two  horses  Torft  and  Joe  were  fed  a  grain 
ration  composed  by  weight  of  100  pounds  of  whole  oats,  160  pounds  of 
whole  corn,  and  30  pounds  of  old  process  linseed  meal.  Tom  received 
daily  20  pounds  of  the  mixture  and  Joe  19  pounds,  in  addition  to  18 
pounds  of  hay.  This  ration  was  continued  until  September  28,  when  it 
was  slightly  modified  by  decreasing  the  linseed  meal  to  20  pounds  in  the 
mixture,  or  about  7  per  cent.  The  reason  for  the  reduction  was  that  the 
linseed  did  not  mix  evenly  with  the  corn  and  oats,  owing  to  the  fact  that 
they  were  not  ground  or  crushed;  hence  considerable  would  separate  out 
and  the  horses  were  inclined  to  leave  a  little.  Horses  do  not  seem  to  care 
particularly  for  the  linseed  if  fed  unmixed,  but  will  eat  a  reasonable  amount 
readily  if  constituting  a  part  of  a  mixture.  This  ration  was  continued 
until  November  11.  The  horses  did  regular  farm  work  during  this  j^eriod, 
but  did  not  average  as  many  hours  daily  as  earlier  in  the  season,  and  the 
work  would  be  considered  only  moderate. 


THE    NUTRITION   OF   THE   HORSE. 


263 


Weights. 


Tom. 


Joe. 


September  2, 
September  9, 
September  16, 
September  23, 
September  30, 
October  7, 
October  14,  . 
October  21,  . 
October  28,  . 
November  4, 
November  11, 


1,405 
1,395 
1,405 
1,435 
1,445 
1,450 
1,440 
1,425 
1,415 
1.410 
1,425 


1,325 
1,315 
1,330 
1,345 
1,350 
1,370 
1,340 
1,340 
1,340 
1,350 
1,360 


Digestible  Nutrients  in  Ration  {Pounds). 

Protein. 

Total 
(Fat  X  2.2). 

Nutritive 
Ratio. 

18  pounds  hay  +  20  pounds  grain  equals 
Kellner's  standard  (hard  work). 

3.11 

2.80 

24.04 
24.50 

1  :6.7 
1  :  7.7 

On  the  basis  of  the  calculated  digestible  nutrients  it  is  evident  that  tlie 
horses  were  receiving  all  the  food  necessary  for  eight  hours  of  hard  work 
daily.  The  work  actually  performed  could  only  be  called  moderate,  which 
explains  to  an  extent  the  gain  in  live  weight.  It  is  believed  that  the  addi- 
tion of  5  to  10  per  cent,  of  linseed  meal  to  a  grain  ration  composed  of  one 
or  more  cereals  will  prove  helpful,  especially  to  hard-worked  horses,  and 
will  be  eaten  without  trouble. 


INDEX. 


INDEX 


PAGE 

Advanced  registrj',  testing  of  pure-bred  cows  for,         .....     36a 

Alfalfa,  composition,  digestibility  and  feeding  value,    .....      105 

Chemical  composition  of  alfalfa  and  red  clover,     .....      107 

Digestibilitj'  of  alfalfa  hay, .109 

Feeding  experiments  with  alfalfa,  .  .  .111 

Alfalfa  a.  rowen  for  milk  production  (experiments  4  and  5),  125 

Alfalfa,  beet  pulp  and  corn  meal  v.  hay,  beet  pulp   and   corn  gluten 

(experiments  1,  2  and  3),        .  .  .  .111 

Diuretic  elTect  of  the  alfalfa,  .......     120 

Effect  of  different  forms  of  protein  on  yield  and  character  of  milk,      119 
Effect  of  dry  matter  in  the  two  ration.s  on  yield  of  milk  and  milk 

ingredients,  .117 

Influence  of  increased  metabolism  caused  by  the  alfalfa  on  yield  of 

milk  and  live  weight,  .  .  .121 

Alfalfa,   corn   stover,    corn-and-cob  meal   and    bran   r.    English   hay, 
corn-and-cob  meal,  gluten  feed  and  bran  for  milk  production, 
(experiment  7),     .  .  .  .  .  .137 

Alfalfa,  English  hay  and  grain  v.  English  hay  and  grain  for  milk  pro- 
duction (experiment  6),  .  .  .  .  .  .  132 

Summary  and  suggestions,  ........      105 

Alfalfa  for  horse.s, 250,  252 

Aphids,  apple,  control  of,  .........       47 

Bibliography,    .  .  .  .  .  ...  •  .  .56 

Conclusions,      ...........       55 

Definition  of  terms,  ..........       47 

Delayed  dormant,  .........       48 

Dormant,       .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .47 

Late  dormant,  .  .  .  .  .  .      •    .  .  .47 

Delayed  dormant  spraying,  object,      .......       48 

Eggs,  laboratory  tests  for  destruction  of,      .  .  .  .  ■  .49 

Eggs,  period  of  hatching,    .........       48 

Lime-sulfur,  action  upon  aphid  eggs,   .......       50 

Action  upon  living  aphids,       ........       53 

Foliage  injury,        ..........        53 

Lime-sulfur  and  nicotine  slilfate,  action  upon  aphids,     .  .  .  .54 

Foliage  injury,  ..........       54 

Miscible  oils,  action  upon  aphid  eggs,  ......       51 

Action  upon  living  aphids,       ........       55 

Foliage  injury,        .  .        "  .  .  .  .  .  -  .55 

Object  of  comparative  tests,        ........       47 

Apple  aphids,  control  of,  .  .  .  •        .  .  •  •  •  .47 

Asparagus,  Martha  Washington,         .  ...  .  .  •  •  •     46a 

Bacillary  white  diarrhcea,  testing  fowl.s  for,  ......     53a 


268 


INDEX. 


Bacterimn  pullorum  studies,       ..... 

Beans,  inheritance  of  seed-coat  color. 

Bibliography,    ....... 

Blossom  color  and  seed-coat  color,  correlation  between 
Crosses  of  pigmented  with  non-pigmented  beans. 
Literature,  review  of,  .  .  . 

Methods  of  recording  data. 
Methods  used  in  the  investigation. 
Pigment  in  beans  due  to  a  complex  factor, 
Pigment  patterns,  inheritance  of, 
Eyedness,      ..... 

Crosses  of  eyed  with  self-colored  beans 
Crosses  of  eyed  with  white  beans. 
Eye  size,    ..... 

Factors  for,     . 
Mottling,  crosses  of  mottled  beans. 

Crosses  of  mottled  with  self-colored  beans 
Crosses  of  mottled  with  white  beans,     . 
Crosses  of  self-colored  beans  yielding  mottled  progeny, 
Crosses  of  self-colored  beans  yielding  only  self-colored  progeny, 
Crosses   of   self-colored   beans  with   white   beans   yield 
progeny,      ..... 

Dark  mottling,  ..... 

Factor  determining  pattern. 

Factors,     ...... 

Light  mottling,  .... 

Pigments,  inheritance  of,    . 

Crosses  of  Blue  Pod  Butter,  factors  involved. 
With  beans  of  the  red  series, 
With  beans  of  the  yellow-black  series,  . 
With  mottled  varieties. 
With  other  self-colored  varieties. 
Crosses  of  Bountiful  with  black  wax  varieties 
Crosses  involving  Creaseback, 
Crosses  involving  Davis  Wax, 
Crosses  involving  White  Marrow,     . 
Red  determiners,  behavior  of. 
Red  series,     ...... 

Yellow-black  and  red  series,  interrelations. 
Yellow-black  determiners,  behavior  of, 
Yellow-black  series,         .... 

Summary,  ...... 

Varieties  used  in  the  investigation. 

Genetic  constitution  of,  ... 

Bordeaux  mixture,  value  as  an  insecticide. 
Brewers'  dried  grains  for  horses. 
Bulletin  No.  182.     Soy  beans  as  human  food,     . 
Bulletin  No.  18-3.     Rose  canker  and  its  control, 
Bulletin  No.  184.     Late  dormant  v.  delayed  dormant  or  gr 

for  the  control  of  apple  aphids. 
Bulletin  No.  185.     The  inheritance  of  seed-coat  color  in  gar 
Bulletin  No.  186:  — 

Part  I.     The  composition,  digestibility  and  feeding  value  of  alfalfa 
Part  II.     The  value  of  corn  bran  for  milk  production, 
Bulletin  No.  187.     Clarification  of  milk,     ...... 


mottled 


een  tip  treatment 


den  beans. 


P.\GE 

55a 
59 

103 
64 
65 
59 
61 
60 
65 
67 
79 
80 
81 
79 
81 
68 
68 
70 
71 
71 


72 
76 
77 
73 
67,  76 
82 
84 
92 
86 
83 
82 
90 


98 

99 

92 

82 

93 

84 

83 

102 

63 

101 

43a 

250,  257 

1 


11 

47 
59 

105 
142 
155 


INDEX. 


269 


Bulletin  Xo.  ISS.     The  nutrition  of  the  horse, 

Butter  fat,  chemistry  of,  ... 

Cabbage  root  maggot,  experiment.s  in  control  of 

Calves,  protein  requirements  of, 

Canning  investigations,    . 

Celery  blight,  .... 

Spraying  experiments. 
Chemical  work,  numerical  summary, 
Clarification  of  milk. 
Codling  moth,  .... 

Color  in  garden  beans,  inheritance  of. 
Composition  of  alfalfa. 
Control  work,  .... 

Dairy  law,         .... 

Feeding  stuffs  law,    . 
Feed  law  account. 

Fertilizer  law,  .... 
Fertilizer  law  account,    . 
Corn  bran  as  a  feed  for  dairy  cows,   . 

Compared  with  wheat  bran  for  milk  production 

Summary  and  suggestions, 

WTiat  corn  bran  is,    . 
Cows,  pure-bred,  testing  for  advanced  registry. 
Cows,  value  of  corn  bran  in  ration,    . 
Cranberries,  chemical  changes  in  storage 
Cranberry  substation,  accounts, 
Cucumber  mosaic  or  "white  pickle," 
Dairy  law,  examination  for  certificates. 

Inspection  of  glassware. 

Inspection  of  machines  and  apparatus 
Digestibility  of  alfalfa  hay. 
Digestion  experiments  with  calves,     . 

With  horses,      .... 

With  sheep,      .... 
Digger  wasps,  .  .  ... 

Director,  resignation  of,  . 
Egg  production,       .... 
European  cprn  borer, 
Feed  law  account,    .... 
Feeding  experiments  with  cows,  alfalfa. 

Corn  bran,        .... 
Feeding  experiments  with  horses, 
Feeding  stuffs  inspection. 
Feeding  trials: 

Alfalfa, 

Kansas  experiments, 
Massachusetts  experiments,     . 

Brewers'  dried  grains. 

Linseed  meal  as  a  grain  supplement, 

Rations  for  work  horses,  etc.. 
Fertilizer  experiments,  Barium-Phosphate, 

Comparison  of  muriate  and  high-grade  sulfate  of 

Comparison  of  phosphates, 

Comparison  of  potash  salts  (Field  G), 

Fertilizers  for  corn  (North  Corn  Acre), 


potash  (Field  B) 


PAGE 

243 

27a 

46a 

28a 

48a 

21a 

21a 

,47a 

38a 

48a 

,  155 

41a 

59 

108 

7a 

32a 

32a 

8a 

29a 

7a 

28a 

142 

142 

143 

142 

142 

36a 

28a 

142 

27a 

6a 

25a 

32a 

32a 

33a 

109 

28a 

28a 

28a 

40a 

3a 

50a 

40a 

8a 

111 

142 

250 

32a 

250 

252 

252 

253 

250 

257 

251 

262 

251 

32a 

13a 

13a 

13a 

13a 

270 


INDEX. 


Fertilizer  experiments  —  Concluded. 

Green  manures  v.  stable  manure  for  vegetables, 
Nature's  Plant  Food,  .... 

Nitrogen  experiment  (Field  A), 

Orchard,  ...... 

Prepared  peat,  ..... 

Top-dressing  permanent  mowings  (Grass  Plots), 
Fertilizer  inspection,  ..... 

Fertilizer  law  account,      ..... 

Fertilizer  law,  supplementary,  .... 

Food  distribution  in  Holyoke,  study  of. 
Forage  crop  observations,  Sudan  grass, 

Sweet  clover,    ...... 

Grass  Plots,  comparison  of  timothy  and  fescue  mixtur 
Experiments  in  top-dressing  permanent  mowings 
Hog  cholera  investigations,        .... 

Horse,  nutrition  of,  ..... 

Books,      ....... 

Feeding  trials,  alfalfa,         -  . 

Brewers'  dried  grains,     .... 

Kansas  experiments,        .... 

Linseed  meal  as  a  grain  sui)i)lement, 
Massachusetts  experiments,     . 
Rations  for  work  hor.ses, 
Results,  ...... 

Velvet  bean  meal,  .... 

Investigations,  application  of  calorimetry,    . 

Early, 

Recent,  ...... 

Sxmimary,      ...... 

Horses,  digestion  and  energy  experiments  with, 
Inheritance  of  seed-coat  color  in  garden  beans,    . 
Insecticides,  tests,  arsenite  of  lime, 
Bordeaux  mixture,  home-made, 
Insecto,    .... 

Kling  Kill  Insecticide, 
Nature's  Plant  Food, 
Plant  Lice  Killer, 
Pyrox,      .... 

Sylpho-Nathol, 
Insecto,  value  as  an  in.secticide. 
Insects,  cabbage  root  maggots. 
Codling  moth. 
Digger  wa.sps,  . 
European  corn  borer. 
Onion  maggot, 
Scale  insects, 
"Kling  Kill  Insecticide,  VQ,lue  of, 
Legumes,  culture  for. 
Lettuce  drop. 

Light,  relation  to  plant  growth, 
Linseed  meal  for  horses,   . 
Market-garden  field  station. 
Milk,  clarification  of, 

Clarifier,  significance  of,     . 
Corpuscular  elements  of  milk, 


PAGE 

.     46a 

.31a,  47a 

.     13a 

.     13a 

.     31a 

.     14a 

.     29a 

.       7a 

.     30a 

.      12a 

.     29a 

.     29a 

16a,  19a 

14a 

.     55a 

.     243 

.     249 

250,  252 

250,  257 
.     252 

251,  262 
.  253 
.  251 
.     250 

250,  259 

.  245 

.  243 

.  245 

.  247 

.  28rt 

.  59 

.  40a 

.  43a 

.  43a 

.  41a 

.  41a 

.  42a 

.  43a 

.  42a 

.  43a 

.  46a 

.  41a 

.  40a 

.  40o 

.  40a 

.  41a 

.  41a 

.  49a 

.  20a 

.  21a 

251,  262 

.  46a 

48o,  155 

.  155 

.  196 


INDFA'. 


271 


Milk— Co  ltd  inh  (I. 

Development  of  niicro-orguiiisins  in  chirifiecl  ;uk1  unclurified  milU 
Effect  of  clarification  on  fermentation  changes  of  milk, 
On  micro-organisms  in  certified  and  commercial  milk, 
On  nmiiber  of  micro-organisms  in  milk, 
On  pure  cultures,  .... 
Effect  of  repeated  clarification  on  bacterial 
Effect  of  temperatme  on  clarification. 
Effect  of  three  clarifications  on  pure  cultures 
Fibrin  (so-called)  in  milk, 
Micro-organisms  in  milk,    . 
Milk,  colonization  of  bacteria  in. 

Efficiency  of  individual  organi.-^ms  free  and  in  colony. 
Slime,  amount  removed. 

Clarification  of  certified  milk  (Davies), 

Methods, 

Effect  of  temperature  on. 
Slime,  definition,        .... 
Dirt  in, 

Fibrin  (so-called)  in. 
Food  value  of,        . 
Leucocytes  (so-called)  in. 
Micro-organisms  in. 
Summary,  ..... 

Milk  production,  alfalfa  and  corn  v.  purchased  grain. 

Corn  bran,  value  for. 
Mowings,  top-dressing  for  (Grass  Plots),    . 
Mycological  collection,     .... 
Nature's  Plant  Food,  as  a  fertilizer,  . 

As  an  insecticide,       .... 
Nitrogen  experiment  (Field  A), 
Nutrition  of  the  horse,      .... 
Onion  diseases,  bacterial  rot,     . 

Smut, 

Onion  maggot,  ..... 

Orchard,  fertilizer  experiments. 
Peach-breeding  experiments. 
Pruning  experiments. 
Root  and  scion  experiments. 
Winterkilling,   ..... 
Peach-breeding  orchard,  .... 
Phosphates,  comparison  of,        . 
Plant  diseases,  celery  blight. 

Cucumber  mosaic  or  "white  pickle,"  . 
Lettuce  drop,  ..... 
Onion,  bacterial  rot, 

Smut, 

Potato,  early  blight. 

Late  blight,  ..... 
Leaf  roll,  ..... 
Mosaic,  ..... 

Phoma  disease,       .... 
Rose  canker,     ..... 
Strawberries,  decay. 
Plant  growth,  relation  of  light  to. 
Plant  Lice  Killer,  value  of,        . 


PAGE 

217 
239 
214 
2().S 
229 
229 
228 
237 
202 
203 
238 
238 
159 
162 
162 
177 
158 
185 
184 
180 
183 
190 
241 
137 
142 
14« 
25« 
(,  47a 
41a 
1.3a 
243 
25a 
25a 
40a 
13a 
44a 
44a 
44a 
45a 
44a 
13a 
21a 
25a 
20a 
25a 
25a 
24a 
24a 
24a 
23a 
23a 
11 
21a 
21a 
42a 


272 


INDEX. 


Potash,  comparison  of  muriate  and  high-grrade  sulfate  (Field  B), 
Potash  salts,  comparison  of  (Field  G), 
Potato  diseases,  early  blight, 
Late  blight, 
Leaf  roll, 
Mosaic,    . 
Phoma  disease, 
Potato  diseases  due  to  poor  seed. 
Potato  injury  due  to  drought,  . 
Poultry,  elimination  of  broodiness, 

Inheritance  of  winter  egg  production, 
Pruning  experiment, 
Publications  in  1918, 

Chemistry  department. 
Microbiology  department, 
Pyrox,  value  of. 
Rations  for  work  horses. 
Report  of  director, 

Treasurer, 
Reports  of  departments,  agricultural  economies. 
Agriculture, 
Botany,   . 
Chemistry, 
Entomology,     . 
Horticulture,    . 
Microbiology,  . 
Poultry  husbandry,   . 
Veterinary  science,    . 
Rose  canker  and  its  control, 
Causal  fungus,  description, 
Chlamydospores,    . 
Conidia, 
Conidiophores, 
Mycelium,     . 
Sclerotia, 
Causal  fungus,  life  history. 
Germination  of  the  spores. 

Effect  of  desiccation  on  the  spores. 
Effect  of  freezing  the  spores, 
Temperature  relations. 
Thermal  death  point  of  spores, 
Parasitic  life  of  the  fungus. 
Infection  court, 
Mycelium  in  the  host  tissues. 
Effect  on  host  cells. 
Normal  structure  of  stem, 
Path  of  myceliimi. 
Pathogenicity,    . 
Saprophytic  life  of  the  fungus. 
Depth  of  penetration  of  the  soil, 
Effect  of  freezing  the  mycelium. 
Growth  on  other  substrata. 
Longevity  of  mycelium  in  soil. 
Rate  of  growth  of  mycelium. 
Thermal  death  point  of  mycelium, 


INDEX. 


273 


Rose  canker  and  its  control  —  Concluded. 
Control,  ..... 
Eradication  of  the  pathogene, 
Disinfection  of  pots,  tools,  etc., 
Disinfection  of  soil  by  chemicals. 
Greenhouse  tests,     . 
Laboratory  tests, 
Disinfection  of  soil  by  heat, 
Greenhouse  tests,     . 
Laboratory  tests,     . 
Exclusion  of  the  pathogene,     . 
Immunization  of  the  host. 
Protection  of  the  host,    . 

Fungicidal  coverings,  comparative  value  of. 
Treatment  of  the  walks  in  the  house. 
Summary,     ..... 
Cylindrocladium,  two  species  compared. 
Cultural  characters, 
Morphological  characters. 
Dissemination, 

Local,  ..... 
Original  source  of  the  pathogene, 
Spread  from  one  grower  to  another, 
Efifect  on  the  plants. 
Literature  cited, 
Symptoms, 
Scale  insects. 
Seed  production. 

Seed-coat  color  in  garden  beans,  inheritance  of. 
Soils  of  Field  A,  study  of  residual  effects  of  limini 
Soils  of  Field  B,  study  of  comparative  eiTects  of  sulfate 
Soy  beans  as  human  food, 
Baked  beans,    . 
Boiled  beans,    . 

Chemical  composition  and  digestibility. 
Fermented  boiled  beans  (natto), 
,    Green  beans,     .... 
Powdered  beans. 
Ripened  vegetable  cheese  (miso), 
Roasted  beans, 
Soy  bean  curd  (tofu), 
Soy  bean  milk  (toniu). 
Soy  bean  pulp  (kara). 
Soy  bean  sauce  (shoyu),     . 
Vegetable  butter,  ice  cream,  oil  and  lard. 
Soy  beans,  varieties. 
Station  staff,  ..... 

Changes  in,       . 
Station,  State  control  of. 

Work  affected  by  the  war. 
Strawberries,  decay  of,      . 
Sudan  grass  as  a  forage  crop,    . 
Sweet  clover  as  a  forage  crop,  . 
Sylpho-Nathol,  value  as  an  insecticide. 
Tobacco,  supply  and  distribution. 
Tobacco-sick  soils,  study  of. 


and  miu^iate  of  potash 


7 

5 

3 

8 

9 

10 

13a 

la 

3rt 

6a 

3a,  20a,  48a,  53a 
21a 
29a 
29a 
42a 
12a 
21a 


PAGE 

37 
38 
42 
39 
40 
39 
41 
42 
41 
38 
45 
43 
43 
44 
45 
34 
35 
35 
32 
33 
32 
33 
13 
46 
12 
41a 
47a 
59 
28o 
27o 
1 
7 


274 


INDEX. 


Variety  tests,  bush  boans, 

Celery,     .... 

Garden  vegetables,    . 

Soy  beans, 

Spring  wheat,   . 

Winter  wheat. 
Velvet  bean  feed  for  horses, 
Water  analysis, 
Weather  of  1918,  as  affecting  crops, 

Orchards, 
Wheat,  spring, 

Winter,    .... 
Wheat  bran,  compared  with  corn  bran  for  milk  production 
W'interkilling  of  fruit  trees,        .  . 


PAGE 

.  47a 
47a 
.  46a 
.  1.3a 
.  14a 
.  14a 

250,  259 
.  35a 
.  21a 
.  45a 
.  14a 
.  14a 

142,  143 
45a 


^