Skip to main content

Full text of "Australian garden history : journal of the Australian Garden History Society"

See other formats


HISTORY 



Va/e Margaret Darling 
j7ze Vision Splendid' 
Queensland conference 


JOURNAL OFTHE AUSTRALIAN GARDEN HISTORY SOCIETY 



r Ssiz] 











"Mjk 

jVtWjt ^MCHiik 

wpd 



Al. ^AUA^ 

GARDEN 

HISTORY 

SOCIETY 

Patron 

Sue Ebury - Countess ofWilton 

Executive Officer 

Jackie Courmadias 

Publication 

Australian Garden History, official 
journal of the Australian Garden 
History Society, is published four 
times a year 

Editors 

Christina Dyson 
Richard Aitken 

editor@gardenhistorysociety.org.au 
8 Eastern Place, Hawthorn East, 
Victoria, 3 1 23 

Enquiries 

TollFree 1 800 678 446 
Phone 03 9650 5043 
Fax 03 9650 8470 

Email 

i nfo@gard en historysociety.org.au 

Website 

www.gard e n h i sto r ysoc i ety. org.au 

Postal Address 

AGHS, Gate Lodge 
1 00 Birdwood Avenue 
Melbourne Victoria 3004 

Subscriptions (GST INCLUSIVE) 


For I year 
Single $67 

Family $92 

Corporate $2 1 5 
Youth $22 


(UNDER 25 YEARS OF AGE) 
Non-profit organisations $92 

Advertising Rates 

1/8 page $ 1 32 
(2+ issues$l2l each) 

I /4 page $220 
(2+ issues$l98 each) 

1/2 page $330 
(2+ issues$275 each) 

Full page $550 
(2+ issues$495 each) 

Inserts $440 

for Australia-wide mailing 

Pro-rata for state-wide mailing 

Editorial Advisory Committee 

CONVENOR 
Christine Reid 

MEMBERS 
Glenn Cooke 
Timothy Hubbard 
Colleen Morris 
Prue Slatyer 
John Viska 


ISSN 1033-3673 


NATIONAL MANAGEMENT 
COMMITTEE 

John Dwyer (Chairman) 

Ray Choate (Vice Chairman) 
Lynne Walker (Secretary) 

Kathy Wright (Treasurer) 

Elected Members 

John Dwyer 
Trisha Dixon Burkitt 
Stuart Read 
Jan Schapper 
John Viska 
Lynne Walker 
Kathy Wright 

State Representatives 

ACT Nancy Clarke 
NSW Eleanor Dartnall 
QLD John Taylor 
SA Richard Nolan 
WA Caroline Grant 
VIC Pamela jellie 
TAS Mike Evans 

BRANCH CONTACTS 

ACT/Monaro/Riverina 

Tony Byrne 
PO Box I 630 
Canberra ACT 260 1 
to ny by r n e@efrect. net.au 

Queensland 

John Taylor 
I I joynt St 

Hamilton QLD 4007 
Phone: 07 3862 4284 
jht@hotkey.net.au 

South Australia 

Ray Choate 
Barr Smith Library 
University of Adelaide 
Adelaide SA 5005 
Phone: 08 8303 4064 
ray.choate@adelaide.edu.au 

Southern Highlands 

Eleanor Dartnall 

478 Argyle Street 

Moss Vale NSW 2577 

Phone: 02 4869 I 825 

eleanor@dartnalladvisors.com.au 

Sydney & Northern NSW 

Stuart Read 

Phone: 02 9873 8554 (w) 
stuart.read@planning.nsw.gov.au 

Tasmania 

Elizabeth Kerry 
PO Box 89, Richmond, TAS 
Phone: (03) 6260 4216 
liz.kerry@keypoint.com.au 

Victoria 

Pamela Jellie 
5 Claremont Cres 
CanterburyVIC3l26 
pdjellie@hotmail.com 

Western Australia 

Caroline Grant 
9A Grange Street 
Claremont WA 
chhgrant@yahoo.com 



Villa Gamberaia from Edith Wharton’s Italian Villas and their Gardens 
(1904) — see co-editor Christina Dyson’s 'Notes from a hillside villa’ 
on page 25. 


Cover: Photographer Simon Griffiths has extensively documented 
Margaret Darling’s garden at Woomargama over several years and 
here we see a quintessential image of the rose garden with rolling 
paddocks and hills beyond. An appreciation of Margaret’s life and 
her support for the Australian Garden History Society — penned by 
friend and colleague Peter Watts — is on page 4. 


2 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 


Architecture Branch Library, The University of Melbourne 



From the chair 

John Dwyer 


Let me begin with thanks on behalf of the Soeiety as a whole to the Tasmanian 
Braneh for the most sueeessful 2010 eonferenee at Launeeston, whieh was 
thoroughly enjoyed by the members fortunate enough to attend it. For some 
members this was the first AGHS eonferenee they had attended, and they 
have been lavish in their praise. I am eonfident that future eonferenees will 
maintain and even improve upon this high standard. It was very pleasing that 
the Tasmanian Braneh agreed to inerease the numbers from 200 to 250 to ease 
the number of members disappointed that they eould not attend, and that Mai 
Paul took the initiative to plan an alternative optional day to avoid many more 
being disappointed. 

This brings me to the question of numbers at future eonferenees, whieh the 
National Management Committee has eare fully eonsidered at several meetings. 
It is always unfortunate when we are unable to provide a plaee at our national 
eonferenee for all of the members wishing to attend. In reeent years this has 
beeome a pressing problem. Some have expressed the view that our eonferenee 
should be large enough for all members to attend. But a eonferenee for 2000 
delegates would be both unwieldy and laeking in eollegiate spirit. Garden 
visits as an integral part of the program would be impossible for numbers of 
that order. The praetiealities of the size of eonferenee venues — partieularly 
outside major eities — and the number of delegates who ean be taken on garden 
visits, require that our eonferenees be smaller than that. Prudent fmaneial 
management means that we should plan for eonferenees whieh will be fully or 
nearly fully booked, and avoid the wasted eost of empty seats. Many members 
have argued that we would lose a great deal if we signifieantly enlarged our 
eonferenees. 

Where a larger venue is available, we are moving eautiously towards a larger 
eonferenee. Our plan for the eonferenee at Ballarat in 2012 is for 300 delegates. 
If we eontinue to have to turn members away, we may eonsider some further 
inerease for later eonferenees at Armidale, NSW (2013) and in Western 
Australia (2014). 

For the 2011 eonferenee at historie Maryborough (Qld), whieh is not a large 
town, we are limited to a maximum of 200 delegates by what is available at 
the venue and by way of aeeommodation. Bookings for the Optional Day are, 
unfortunately, limited to 150 people; the Pre-Conferenee Tour to 60 people; 
and the Post-Conferenee Tour to 60 people. It remains to be seen whether this 
eonferenee will be as popular as reeent eonferenees have been, but we will not 
have the ability to inerease numbers as we did in Launeeston. You will have 
the best ehanee of seeuring a plaee if you book early, but unfortunately some 
may again be disappointed. 

A booking form for the 2011 Annual National Conferenee — to be held in 

August — is enelosed with this journal. 


Contents 

Vale Margaret Florenee 
Darling AM (1923-2010) 

PETER WATTS 
4 

Finding Netherby and its 
custodian Robert Pulleine 
CAS MIDDLEMIS 
6 

Margaret Floekton: botanieal 
artist 

PAMELA BELL 
12 

‘The Vision Splendid’ 

Conference Summary 
DEBORAH MALOR 
Engaging with the designed 
landscape 
JANE LENNON 
16 

32nd Annual National 
Conference, Maryborough, 
Queensland, 19-22 August 2011 
21 

Victory for Mawallok—andfor 
the protection of historic gardens 
PETER WATTS 
23 

Notes from a hillside villa: 
Revisiting Villa Gamberaia 
CHRISTINA DYSON 

25 

Review essay: Plants from old 

catalogues 

STUART READ 

26 

For the bookshelf 

28 

Recently released 

29 

Jottanda 

30 

Dialogue 

31 

Society news 

32 

Diary dates 

33 

Western Australian landscape 
forum 

CAROLINE GRANT 
35 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 


3 


Vale Margaret Florence Darling AM 
(lo May 1923-6 November 2010) 

Peter Watts 


With the passing of Margaret Darling, the 
Australian Garden History Society has lost one 
of its greatest supporters. Margaret served the 
AGHS as both Chair of its National Management 
Committee (1990—99) and Patron (1999—2006). 

At her memorial service at St John’s Anglican 
Church, Toorak, on 16 November 2010, one of 
her grandchildren was quoted as saying ‘she was a 
classic and just got better with age’. 

With the passing of 
Margaret Darling, the 
Australian Garden History Society 
has lost one of its 
greatest supporters 

Margaret Anderson was born in 1923 and attended 
St Catherine’s, Toorak, a school with which she 
maintained a lifelong association. She was accepted 
to study architecture at the Melbourne Technical 
College (after the war renamed Royal Melbourne 
Institute of Technology), but war intervened and 
she joined the Women’s Royal Australian Naval 
Service (WRANS), working in signal code breaking. 
She married L. Gordon Darling in 1945 (dissolved 
1989) and while managing a growing family of four 
children developed a growing interest and active 
involvement in the conservation of the historic 
environment. She was a very active Councillor of 
the National Trust of Australia (Victoria) from 1966 
to 1990, serving as President from 1979—82 and 
then as a Vice-President. In 1991 she became a 
Member of the Order of Australia in recognition of 
her service to the Trust. 

But Margaret was not just one to sit at the board 
table. And she was certainly not one to squander her 
privileged personal circumstances. I recall her, on 
many occasions, lugging heavy boxes of merchandise 
around the National Trust headquarters at Como 
that were destined for the highly profitable 



Margaret Darling pictured in 1 980 during her presidency of the 
National Trust of Australia (Victoria) — it was at this time Margaret 
offered the support of the Trust in hosting the first Garden History 
Conference (at its Toorak property lllawarra) and in the subsequent 
founding of the Australian Garden History Society. 

National Trust Women’s Committee shop which she 
managed — as a volunteer. Through the Women’s 
Committee Margaret published the wonderful 
garden books of her close friend, and AGHS 
benefactor, Joan Law-Smith. I recall her infectious 
enthusiasm when she read my manuscript The 
Gardens of Edna Walling dsadi wanted immediately 
to publish it. Typical of Margaret there was no 
contract, but a firm ‘understanding’. That was her 
way — minimum fuss, maximum return. In truth 
Margaret could have been a highly successful and 
wily commercial publisher. 

Margaret was President of the Victorian National 
Trust at the time it hosted the conference at which 
the Australian Garden History Society was born 
and she offered wise counsel on the development 
of our constitution. As its author I recall her advice: 


4 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 


National Trust of Australia (Victoria) 


‘Keep it short and sweet or there will be too much to 
challenge’ — such wise words. Margaret later served 
the AGHS with distinction, as Chair of the NMC, 
and subsequently as Patron. No matter what her 
role Margaret lead with wisdom, graciousness, and 
enormous energy. 

When Margaret took the Chair of the Society 
in 1990 it was emerging from a difficult period. 
Jocelyn Mitchell had expertly and determinedly 
guided the organisation back to health after a 
particularly difficult time and the NMC was 
looking for someone who could provide a steadying 
influence and consolidate the gains that had 
been made under Jocelyn’s chairmanship. We 
could not have done better than Margaret. She 
combined an unusual set of skills — understanding 
the peculiarities of a voluntary conservation 
organisation, respecting the academic and cultural 
dimension that underpinned the AGHS, and 
knowing that hard work and time were needed to 
do the job well. Equally she knew the importance 
of the bottom line and together with the Treasurer, 
Robin Lewarne, nurtured the Society’s finances. 
Margaret had a keen eye for a column of figures 
and she kept a tight rein on the financial and 
administrative aspects of the Society, finishing her 
term with the AGHS in fine shape. Committee 
meetings in her elegant apartment overlooking 
Melbourne’s Royal Botanic Gardens were lively 
and decisively lead, and always fun. 

Margaret combined an unusual 
set of skills — understanding 
the peculiarities of a voluntary 
conservation organisation, respecting 
the academic and cultural dimension 
that underpinned the AGHS, and 
knowing that hard work and time 
were needed to do the job well 

Margaret’s generosity knew no bounds. As Chair she 
regularly attended AGHS events all over Australia. 
Each year, quietly and at her own expense, she 
visited the state whose task it was to host the next 
annual national conference. She vetted each garden 
to be visited, the conference programme, and the 
venue, and used her formidable skills in tact and 
diplomacy to ensure that everything would meet her 
high standards. 


It was Margaret who suggested, then arranged 
for, Joan Eaw-Smith to bequeath her book. 

Kindred Spirits^ to the AGHS. The Kindred Spirits 
Eund, as it became known, now stands at over 
$150,000. What a wonderful gift that has been, 
allowing the Society to foster, in a very tangible 
way, some of its scholarly, literary, and artistic 
interests. Margaret too, without any fanfare, made 
significant financial contributions to the Society. 

In an act of great generosity she matched the 
AGHS contribution to the development of The 
Oxford Companion to Australian Gardens. Richard 
Aitken, in his Acknowledgements, noted that 
‘without it the Companion would surely never 
have come to fruition’. 

Ihe garden at Woomargama 
was her great passion ... 
an affair of the head and the he art ^ 

Margaret may have gone but Woomargama remains. 
Here, in southern New South Wales, Margaret had 
gardened since acquiring the property in 1965. Her 
son, Michael, noted at Margaret’s memorial service 
‘the garden at Woomargama was her great passion 
...an affair of the head and the heart ... and it was 
fitting that it was at its peak when she died, a living 
“floral tribute’”. Woomargama was a metaphor for 
Margaret — elegant, controlled, intellectual, civilised, 
visionary, and the result of deep knowledge and 
hard labour. It was not without whimsy too. As her 
daughter, Clare, noted ‘the cartridges were kept 
with the hankies’. That was very Margaret. 

Margaret Darling will be remembered with great 
affection and deep gratitude by all associated with 
the Australian Garden History Society. 


Peter Watts AM is a former Chairman of the 
Australian Garden History Society National 
Management Committee. 

An obituary for Margaret Darling, by Lynne Cairncross, 
was published in the Sydney Morning Herald on 
13 December and in The Age on 27 December 2010. 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 


5 


Courtesy Michael Treloar 


Finding Netherby and its custodian 

Robert Pulleine 

Cas Middlemis 


The spirited polymath Robert Pulleine (1869-1935) was an acknowledged 
specialist in botany and anthropology as well as a highly respected medical doctor 
Pulleine’s endeavours benefited the Adelaide community and also institutions internationally 


Robert Pulleine of Netherby 

Pulleine Street, in the Adelaide suburb of Netherby, 
is a wistful echo and reminder of the exceptional 
man for whom it was named. Dr Robert Henry 
Pulleine. It is easy to imagine from our twenty-first 
century perspective that we have the priority on 
communication and travel, but almost loo years 
ago, Pulleine was in touch with experts worldwide 
in his fields of interest and passion. He travelled 
extensively to increase his knowledge and augment 
his notable plant collection which focused on cacti 
and other succulents. Pulleine excelled in a wide 
variety of fields and, maybe more importantly, 
shared his scholarship with others. 



Pulleine’s bookplate encapsulated his polymathic interests in the 
worlds of science, anthropology, and natural history. 


Robert Pulleine moved to Adelaide with his 
family in i88i, aged 13. In 1892 he attended the 
University of Adelaide to study medicine. He 
moved to Sydney to complete his degree and then 
began working at Sydney’s Prince Alfred Hospital. 
He married an Adelaide woman, Ethel Williams, 
in 1899 and the couple initially settled in Gympie, 
Queensland, before moving to Adelaide in 1905. 
The Pulleines spent a year overseas in Germany 
where Robert worked in an eye clinic at Gottingen 
University, Dr Pulleine returned to Adelaide in 
1907 and established a medical practice with two 
partners. He was well regarded in this field. 



Portrait of R.H. Pulleine, c. 1 930 


6 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 


Pulleine Family Collection held by DiTostevin 




Dr Pulleine and his family lived 
in a house called Netherby. 

The house had been 
built in the late 1840s, 
with a number of 
owners prior to the 
Pulleines. One 
owner, Sir William 
Morgan, was 
Premier of South 
Australia for 
nearly three years 
from September 
1878, and Netherby 
saw many official 
functions during that 
time. The grounds had 1 1 
acres of orangery and vineyards. 

Morgan was, according to one 
newspaper article, an expert on citrus fruits and 
opened up a spring with a plentiful water supply 
for the ‘orange and lemon trees of every variety’.^ 
The subsequent owner, keen on maintaining the 
established orchards, added a gardener’s cottage. 
After that the property passed into the hands of the 
Bank of New South Wales. There was a series of 
caretakers and a few other owners until 1913, when 
Dr Pulleine and his family moved in. Ethel also 
gave birth to their fifth child in that year. 

By 1931 Dr Pulleine was known to have the 
best collection of succulents in South Australia, 
comprising almost 800 varieties. One writer 
commented that ‘notwithstanding his [medical] 
practice he takes a big interest in his wonderful 
garden, in ornithology and anthropology and yet he 
never seems to be in a hurry. How I envy him his 
calm temperament!’^ 


William Tibb its, Netherby House, Netherby, South Australia, c. 1 896. 
[Art Gallery of South Australia (893P6); Presented by the family of Dr R.H. 
Pulleine, 1989] 

related to his botanical interests. 

Fortunately a number of excellent black and white 
images document the garden, some taken at the 
time the property was acquired in 1913, others in 
the early 1930s, and an aerial photograph in 1936. 
These images can transport the viewer to that point, 
the day the shutter clicked. Any lack of colour only 
serves to highlight the layout and foliage variations. 

An attractive long and wide drive ending in a large 
loop took the visitor to the house though a rich 
selection of plant species. Large clumps of dense 
shrubs along the driveway created a green wall 


The Netherby garden 

The structured or formal part of the garden at 
Netherby during Pulleine’s time was about one sixth 
of the property. It fanned out westwards from the 
house and included the main drive. The rest of the 
land was mostly hedged orchards and open land with 
overgrown areas containing large pine tree groves, or 
the ‘Wild Part’ as the grandchildren called it. John 
Noble recalled that this area was the backdrop for 
their childhood games. 3 When the wind blew though 
the pine trees it added a wonderful soundscape. The 
orchards, to the north of the property, contained 
citrus and olive trees. It would appear that much 
of the garden structure at Netherby had been 
established prior to Pulleine’s arrival. But significantly 
he augmented it with an extensive plant collection 


Detail of 1 936 RAAF aerial photograph (north to top of photo) 
showing Netherby 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 


7 


United Photo & Graphic Services (image 885/4255-936) 




Pulleine Family Collection held by Carolyn Semple Pulleine Family Collection held by Carolyn Semple 



Netherby at the time the Pulleine family took up residence, c. 1 9 1 3- 1 4. 


and added a sense of mystery to what lay beyond. 

In neighbouring sections of the driveway shrubs 
were used giving a more open feel. A stand of trees 
(possibly conifers) was mirrored across the drive. 

The lower limbs were removed and they were under 
planted with low shrubs interspersed with strappy 
plants. Close to the house, a rock border added 
formality to the driveway and a similar treatment 
was used to divide the formal plant beds. Large 
rocks also littered the beds creating a naturalistic 
scene. The top section of the loop, close to the 
house, had a lawn area for children to play. Just a 
short distance behind the house. Brown Hill could 
be seen. Rising just 300 metres it was a perfect. 


lightly treed backdrop. One visitor commented 
that this ‘old-fashioned’ garden with its trees and 
shrubs and quaint-looking cacti and euphorbia was 
a delight to visit. Robert Pulleine did not do all 
the physical gardening although he was involved. 
According to the family, three gardeners were 
employed although two were very old. 

Pulleine’s botanical interests 

Sadly both the garden and the house at Netherby 
are long gone, with numerous houses filling 
the landscape where the Pulleine children and 
grandchildren used to play. But the story does not 
end there as Robert Pulleine’s diverse botanical 



At the end of one of the 
garden beds, standing like a 
proud sentinel, was a five- 
foot Carnegiea gigantea 
that Pulleine had managed 
to safely transport from 
Arizona. Whilst in America 
visiting the Boyce Thompson 
arboretum with a friend, 
Pulleine had been allowed 
to 'chose and pack the best 
medium specimen we could 
find in an afternoon'. He 
commented in a letter to 
Arthur Hill (director of the 
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew) 
in 1931 that 'my specimen 
unpacked without a single 
broken spine and now after 
nearly two years is showing 
quick growth."* Adelaide’s 
climate proved very suitable 
for such plants. 


8 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 



Pulleine Family Collection held by Carolyn Semple 



An interesting garden feature of Netherby was its large Oriental-influenced rustic gate (for vehicular traffic) of bamboo and bark-stripped 
branches. This photograph was taken around 1 9 1 3 so it is uncertain if the gate was installed by Robert Pulleine, although his grandson, John 
Noble, recalled that the interior furnishings at Netherby were largely oriental style including framed kimono cloths, screens and 'many cabinets 
full of mysterious ebony, jade and ivory objects, charms, figurines [and] opium weights.'^ 


interests were wide-ranging. In 1907 he brought to 
the attention of authorities the potential danger of 
fruit fly to South Australia, having seen the damage 
caused in Queensland. He noted that introduction 
could be ‘as simple as a piece of affected fruit 
brought over by passengers and perhaps thrown out 
the window of a train in orchard country.’ Today all 
interstate travellers to South Australia are asked to 
heed fruit fly protection measures. 

In 1909 Robert Pulleine established the South 
Australian Botanical Club which regularly held its 
meetings in his medical rooms on North Terrace. 
Amongst the members and regular attendees was 
botanist John Black, author of The Naturalised Flora 
of South Australia (1909) and the later multi-volume 
The Flora of South Australia. He was considered 
to be the best systematic botanist in the state for 
almost fifty years. Another member was Dr E. 
Angas Johnson, a governor and benefactor of the 
Adelaide Botanic Garden, who published a number 
of papers on the history of plants. Club members 
discussed a wide range of issues including fodder 
feed, the disappearance of indigenous plants on 
the Adelaide plains, the merits and disadvantages 
of growing of spineless cactus, and the value to 
medicine of Australian plant species. 

In 1916 Pulleine questioned why the state 
government was suddenly interested in the Botanic 
Garden appointments after being unconcerned 
about the Garden previously, both in its structure 
and funding. He was questioning the government 


appointee for the position of director, suggesting 
that first-class men had been shut out of the process. 
He supported the board of governors as they 
maintained a determined attitude with regard to 
the appointment of a successor to director Maurice 
Holtze. Pulleine was very keen to establish a 
herbarium within the Botanic Garden but suggested 
that the government and the public were inclined 
to look upon a botanist simply as a sort of herbalist. 
He keenly defended botanists saying that botany 
was ‘next to mathematics and was the most exact of 
sciences’. ‘During the last 200 years especially since 
Linnaeus’, he added, ‘it had received the attention 
of men of the highest calibre and greatest intellect.’^ 

Robert Pulleine also had a passion for Australian 
flora. He went on a number of excursions inland 
and interstate to broaden his knowledge on 
diverse growing environments. He collected many 
samples, sending them to botanical institutions 
in Australia and overseas. The State Herbarium 
of South Australia has over 100 specimens listed 
under Pulleine’s name. These specimens had been 
collected between 1905 and 1932 from the Gawler 
Ranges, Flinders Ranges, and Innamincka in 
South Australia; Broken Hill and Menindee Lake 
in New South Wales; the Macdonnell Ranges in 
the Northern Territory; Herberton in Queensland; 
and around the south-west of Western Australia. 

The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, received 
several parcels of plants between 1916 and 1931. 

In 1926 Pulleine’s daughter visited the director 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 


9 


Pulleine Family Collection held by Libby and Jim Smith 



Gravel paths led the 
visitor around formal 
island beds in front of the 
house. Located within 
the large driveway loop, 
these beds were densely 
crowded with plants, 
succulents interlaced with 
ground covers. 


at the Gardens in Kew ‘with a small collection of 
ephemeral plants ... and a few odds and ends’. 
One parcel in 1931 from Robert Pulleine was 
acknowledged by Kew’s director, Arthur Hill, 
who commented ‘I note that you intend visiting 
Central Australia again in August, and I shall be 


very pleased to receive any specimens that you 
may collect then. Material from South Australia 
would also be very welcome for the Herbarium.’^ 
The Royal Botanic Garden, Sydney, also holds 
over 140 of Pulleine’s specimens. A new species of 
mesembryanthemum, Carpobrotus pulleinei (now 


10 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 


known, after numerous revisions, as Sarcozona 
praecox)^ from the Gawler Ranges was named after 
him along with six other species of animals and 
plants. Apparently after propagating some arid-zone 
plants Pulleine would post the seedlings to outback 
teachers to plant in school gardens.® 

Robert Pulleine was often in touch with individuals 
in numerous countries seeking to enhance his plant 
collections. These included Dr O. Burchard of the 
Canary Isles, Dr O. Luckhoff of Cape Town, Ernst 
Rusch of South West Africa, Dr Carl Diner, Mrs 
van der Dijl and Louis Vogts of South Africa, Alain 
White of United States of America, and Dr Cravely 
of Madras. In 1932 Pulleine was photographing 
his numerous euphorbias and hoping to bring out 
a monograph on them from a photographic view 
point. Interestingly it appears he was using one of 
Douglas Mawson’s cameras for this work. The Royal 
Botanic Cardens, Kew, sent a parcel of euphorbia 
to Pulleine in August 1932. Although the content is 
not confirmed, it possibly included Arabian and East 
African varieties of euphorbia, which had eluded 
Pulleine to date. 

During its 1933—34 session Robert Pulleine 
presented a paper to the South Australian Branch 
of the Royal Ceographical Society of Australasia 
entitled ‘The botanical colonisation of the Adelaide 
Plains’. Published in 1935, this still provides a useful 
overview of Adelaide’s early plant development 
focusing on some of the key players and plants. 

REFERENCES 

1 Sunday Mail, 9 June 1928, p.13. 

2 Adelaide Advertiser, 17 December 1931, p.i6. 

3 Jim Smith (comp.), A Pulleine Family Story: from 
Yorkshire to New Zealand and Australia, The Author, 
Tuross Head, NSW, 2000, p.io6. 

4 Correspondence from Dr Robert Pulleine to Sir 
Arthur Hill, 15 June 1931, Held by Royal Botanic 
Gardens, Kew. 

5 Jim Smith (comp.), A Pulleine Family Story: From 
Yorkshire to New Zealand and Australia, p.io8. 

6 Adelaide Advertiser, 1 5 July 1 9 1 6, p. 1 1 . 

7 Correspondence from Sir Arthur Hill to Dr Robert 
Pulleine 4 August 1931. Held by Royal Botanic 
Gardens, Kew. 

8 Australian Dictionary of Biography online edition 
http:/ / adbonline.anu.edu. au/biogs/Ai 103 i6b.htm 

9 R. Pulleine, The Botanical Colonisation of the Adelaide 
Plains, SA Branch of the Royal Geographical Society, 
Adelaide, 1935, p.6i. 


Under a section on fruit trees Pulleine comments 
that ‘It could be stated without fear of contradiction 
that no city and community in the world is so famed 
in regard to variety, abundance, and quality of 
its temperate and citrus fruits as Adelaide and its 
vicinity. ’9 Peaches, according to Pulleine’s article, 
found their way to Adelaide via Sydney’s Darling 
Nursery in 1836. So it was interesting to find this 
comment by Arthur Hill in a letter to Pulleine in 
1931: ‘I have not forgotten your kind present of 
peaches to help me on my journey to Melbourne’. 

Envoi 

Dr Robert Pulleine died in 1935, aged 66. He was a 
dynamic character who ‘showed unfailing kindness to 
all with whom he was associated’. He was connected 
with many scientific societies and boards during 
his lifetime including medical, anthropological 
(although not detailed in this article, his work on 
Tasmanians and their stone culture, was noteworthy), 
geographical, and botanical. He held various and 
numerous official positions within these organisations. 
He travelled to conferences and presented papers. 
Although is it difficult to portray the scope of the 
intellect of this passionate and creative individual in 
the short compass of an article and despite the fact 
that the garden and home at Netherby no longer 
exist. Dr Robert Pulleine has left behind myriad ideas 
and aspirations on which can reflect. 


Thanks to members of the Pulleine family 
including Carolyn Semple, Di Tostevin, and 
Libby & Jim Smith; Cate Parkinson for her 
initial research on the subject; the support from 
Garrick Hill and its director Richard Heathcote; 
Judy Blood, Royal Botanic Gardens, Sydney; 
Hannah Jenkinson, Royal Botanic Garden, Kew; 
and Peter Guffley. 

Netherby features in the exhibition ‘Lost 
Gardens of Adelaide’, on show at Garrick Hill 
Historic House and Garden until the end of 
Lebruary 2011 — see <www.carrickhill.sa.gov.au> 
for further details. 


Gas Middlemis is co-author and publisher of Flung 
Out to Dry: Gilbert Toyne’s classic Australian clothes hoist 
which chronicles the rich, little known, and intriguing 
history of an Australian icon, <www.clotheshoist.com> 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 


11 




Margaret Flockton: botanical artist 


Pamela Bell 


The shy but very hard working and intelligent Margaret Flocl<ton (I 861-1953), was 
the first botanical artist employed by the Sydney Botanic Gardens, where she worked 
with the director Joseph Henry Maiden for twenty-six years. 


Margaret Flockton arrived in Sydney in the early 
1880S with her family. She had been born in Sussex 
on 29 September 1861 into a family of amateur 
and some professional artists. Her father had work 
hung at London’s Royal Academy and other family 
members were amateur painters.^ She was educated 
at the free art training school at Cardiff Library and 
Museum. The school was a branch of the South 
Kensington National Art Training Schools, one of 
many established by the British government where 
teachers who were graduates of South Kensington 
gave classes in drawing, painting, sculpture, 
engraving, and lithography for which rigid 
examinations were held. According to family history 
Flockton was also a student at Miss Gann’s Life 
School in Bloomsbury — this too was a branch of 
the South Kensington schools. It may be that there 
she came into contact with the teacher of botanical 
drawing Christopher Dresser, who subsequently 
became an influential ceramic, wallpaper, and 
textile designer. 

In Sydney, Miss Flockton found work with 
publishers and printing companies Gibbs, Shallard 
& Go. and S.T. Leigh. In 1895 she opened her own 
studio at 3 Victoria Arcade, Castlereagh Street, 
Sydney, where she gave classes in painting.^ She 
also became a member of the Royal Art Society, 
where she exhibited oil and watercolour paintings 
every year in company with Sidney Long, Arthur 
Streeton, Tom Roberts, and other notable artists. In 
1895 she exhibited seven paintings of flowers and 
one still life, of which her ‘Waratahs’ was bought by 
the Art Gallery of New South Wales. The Royal Art 
Society selected some of her paintings for inclusion 
in an album presented to Queen Victoria (which 
included works by W. Lister Lister, A.H. Fullwood, 
W.G. Piguenit, and Ethel Stevens). Her painting of 
two dead parrots was also included in the Australian 
Federation Album presented to the Duke and 
Duchess of York in 1901 — this album remains in 


Australia. 1901 was the last year in which Flockton 
exhibited at the Royal Art Society and thereafter 
she gave up painting in favour of a professional life 
as a scientific botanical artist at the Sydney Botanic 
Gardens. 

In 1901, Joseph Henry Maiden, the energetic 
director of the Sydney Botanic Gardens was only 
able to employ Margaret Flockton part time, 
but he was so impressed with her work that he 
persuaded the government that he needed more 
funds to employ her full time. ‘She is a gifted artist 
and lithographer besides possessing good botanical 


ym.CLj Fujii, NSW. Kl. » 



Margaret Flockton’s drawings of White Honeysuckle’ (Banksia 
integrifolia) published in J.H. Maiden's Forest Flora of New South Wales 
(vol. I, 1904, plate 29). 

Facing page: Each of Margaret Flocicton’s published botanical 
drawings was preceded by painstakingly accurate drawings, 
often with water-coloured washes or highlights and occasionally 
undertaken over a lengthy period of time, such as this 'Opuntia 
bergeriana’ (now Opuntia elatior) painted during 1908-1 I. 


12 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 


Royal Botanic Gardens, Sydney 



^ ^ ‘ T ft. 

^ in - 

Cm> xxfci*^ jfvi' uJk^ f*^ 

feiC ptiU /2 Jtxt^ fu^i ^ 


Royal Botanic Gardens, Sydney 





Left and opposite: Margaret 
Flockton’s paintings were 
widely reproduced as 
postcards and in a booklet 
Australian Wild Flowers 
( 1 908) — ^this popular 
illustration of'Christmas 
Bells and Fern' (Bland fordia 
nobilis and Blechnum 
cartilagineum), painted in 
1 900, featured in bothi. 
[Private collection] 



knowledge’ Maiden wrote to the Under Secretary. ^ 
By the time she retired from the Gardens in 1927 
Flockton was earning the very respectable sum 
of £300 per annum. Maiden knew what he was 
doing — here was a highly trained commercial artist, 
who was also a trained lithographer. 


Margaret Flockton was employed at the Sydney 
Botanic Gardens from 1901 to 1927. She was the 
first botanical artist to be employed full time for a 
herbarium in Australia. Flockton’s line drawings 
were reproduced as lithographs, which she made 
herself. This was unusual, as most artists relied 
on others to produce lithographs for publication 
of their art work. Moreover, according to Norman 
Hall, she was the only female lithographic artist 
in Australia at that date .5 

When Maiden employed Flockton, he had 
already embarked on two major projects: T/ie 
Forest Flora of New South (1903— 24), 77 
parts in 8 volumes, and A Critical Revision of 
the Genus Fucalyptus (1903—33), 75 parts in 
8 volumes. By the time the Genus Fucalyptus 
project was complete, Margaret Flockton had 
contributed 308 detailed images. Each drawing 
showed up to 45 separate depictions of leaves, 
stems, buds, flowers, seed pods, and seeds. All 
were exquisitely drawn, with some seeds and 
leaves, for example, shown from different angles. 
All her drawings were arranged into clearly 
balanced and pleasing designs thanks to her 
extensive training in drawing and design. She 
then translated these images into lithographs 
ready for printing. 

At the same time. Maiden was working on a 
second project, the Forest Flora, which like the 
Genus Fucalyptus, was published in sections by 
the Government Printer, William Applegate 
Gullick. This work contained 295 images, 235 
of which were by Margaret Flockton while the 
remaining 60 images were drawn by E.A. King 
under Flockton’s supervision. This work contains 


14 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 



a diverse group of 
plants, many with 
lush-looking blooms, 
graceful sweeping 
branches, leaves, 
and distinctive seed 
pods. The images 
from the Forest 
Flora are perhaps 
more decorative 
than the eucalypts 
due to the nature 
of the specimens. 

All are shown in 
graceful and exquisite 
detail. The patience 
and skill required 
to produce these 
outstanding images, 
and then to translate 
them into lithographs is 
astonishing. Although 
many of the Flockton 
drawings survive, unfortunately there are only very 
few coloured works. These are held by the Royal 
Botanic Gardens Herbarium and Library in Sydney. 

Over the years of Flockton ’s employment at 
the Sydney Botanic Gardens, Maiden gradually 
acknowledged the enormous contribution she had 
made to his publications. In the introduction to the 
first volume of the Genus Fucalyptus^ she is merely 
referred to as the ‘artist’ although by the end of the 
final volume Maiden acknowledged; 

the help I have received from Miss Margaret 
Flockton ... [which] is immense, and it speaks for 
itself. She is practically a joint author. Her drawings 
are alike beautiful and artistic, and the botanist will 
appreciate them because of their fidelity to nature 
... [which has] sometimes brought out a hitherto 
unsuspected point. 

In Volume 7 he wrote of his hope that ‘selections 
from the beautiful drawings of Miss M. Flockton 
will be found in every school throughout the 
Commonwealth’. Likewise in the conclusion 
of Volume 8 of Forest Flora, Maiden wrote ‘It is 
impossible to say what proportion (a very large 
share) of the credit of the work pertains to my 
esteemed colleague. Miss Margaret Flockton ... 
who has supervised the whole of the illustrations, 
and who has drawn and lithographed the vast 


majority of them.’ Again in Volume 8 of the Genus 
Fucalyptus (1933) we read that many of Flockton ’s 
images of eucalypts were made from observation of 
seedlings raised in pots at the Gardens, as Maiden 
said, through gazing at them again and again. 
Besides being used for publication Flockton’s 
drawings were shown ‘before Sydney Scientific 
Societies’, presumably at lectures. Joseph Maiden 
also honoured Miss Flockton by naming new 
species after her: Ole aria flocktoniae, Fucalyptus 
flocktoniae Acacia flocktoniaem 1909, 19 ii, 

and 1916 respectively. 

Both the publications discussed here are in constant 
use by students of botany, to such an extent that 
the University of Sydney has published both in 
their entirety, complete with Flockton’s illustrations, 
in the SETIS electronic book section of the 
University of Sydney Library so that these elegant 
and informative drawings are available, not only to 
students and botanists but also to the general public.^ 

Among many other projects that Flockton worked 
on with Maiden was the research done at the 
Botanic Gardens on the prickly pear, which became 
a threat to agriculture throughout Australia. 

Continued on page 32 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 


15 



'The Vision Splendid': 

31st Annual National Conference, 
Launceston, 5-8 November 2010 

Deborah Malor and Jane Lennon 


Conference summary 

Recording and memory are such subjective matters. 
Entering the wonderfully rich Victorian atmosphere 
of Launceston’s Albert Hall on the first morning 
of the conference, I was immediately drawn to the 
striking mirror by craftsman Peter Colenette on 
display. John Hawkins reminded us of that mirror in 
his talk, referring to its use of treasured Tasmanian 
timbers, the design incorporating Tasmanian 
birds on the brink of extinction, and — against the 
odds of plantation monocultures and ecological 
change outpacing that of adaptation — the mirror’s 
iconographic tree of life. The mirror has watched 
over this conference. 

The mirror draws on the idea of ‘The Vision 
Splendid’, the conference theme, in the words of 
William Wordsworth (from ‘Ode: Intimations of 
Immortality from Recollections of Early Childhood’: 
1807) and of A.B. Paterson (‘Clancy of the 
Overflow’: 1889). This is an important dichotomy, 
the English romantic, the Australian balladeer. Yes, 
at the times they were writing, both Wordsworth 
and Paterson were nostalgic for the past, but in 
different ways. In their poems, they are also looking 
forward, to their countries being inhabited in ways 
almost unimaginable to them. Only that there was 
a future, was understood. But the aesthetic, the 
visual sensibility that informed each one’s vision, is 
of an old country and a new, each writer aware of 
his changing environment. Wordsworth’s England 
was being irrevocably changed by the forces of 
industrialisation and, yes, of tourism. (Wordsworth 
continually complained about the traffic jams to 
the Lake District on summer weekends). Paterson 
was lamenting closer settlement, the demise of 
the squatter, the increasing control of the ‘long 
paddock’, the retreat to the cities (‘doubt he’d 
suit the office’, he quipped of Clancy). He saw the 
impact on the land of what already had occurred 
over the previous century, and there was the 
recognition of not just the fact of continual change 


under the pressure of a humanity bent on an 
evangelical view of progress, but humanity’s belief 
in the rightness of that vision of progress. 

Wordsworth and Paterson wrote across the period 
that informed our forefathers’ view of this land, 
and its subsequent colonisation, the eighteenth and 
nineteenth centuries. Underneath all that romantic 
stuff, they were activists, revolutionaries, rebels 
against the view of progress at all cost. Wordsworth 
and Paterson have looked in the mirror. They have 
not only viewed themselves, and their recent past, 
but they have looked further back, and attempted 
to imagine, to envision, what the deep past may 
have been. Another vision splendid. Of course, 
they cannot inhabit that past — the past is, indeed, 
a foreign country, as Lowenthal reminded us. 

But, like us, they might have thought to use that 
envisioning for a better future. 

The odd couple that is Wordsworth and Paterson 
set the tone for some of the issues raised or 
tacitly recognised at this conference. There have 
been moments of conflict, ambivalence, of great 
questions, comparisons that have not been odious, 
but have been used to activate ideas. I’ll comment 
very briefly on some of these issues. 

Power: In art and photography, just as in the 
cause of empire and colonisation, there is the 
conquistador view (a term clearly borrowed from the 
Spanish conquest of the Americas) — a view that 
is possession, owning what one surveys, naming 
it (probably for somewhere in Britain, or for your 
family ‘back home’). The newcomers to this island, 
Tasmania, saw the vision splendid, the Aboriginal 
fire-controlled landscape before them, set about 
mapping it, controlling the experience of the land 
through inhabitation, shepherding, then fencing, 
walls, enclosures, compounds. Keeping out and 
keeping in. The British or European language of 
power has been symbolised in hard landscaping that 
allows the running of beasts, the planting of crops. 


16 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 



and manufactury of all kinds. But that language of 
power is heard most in the public buildings, houses, 
and gardens of its settler societies. 

Economics: Once the driving force of colonisation, 
economics has continued control of the door to 
exploitation of the land; the driver of destruction of 
buildings, their curtilages, of trees and their cultural 
context, of the species of birds and animals that 
existed in a natural ecology; of the conditions in 
which plants may survive without a regular dose of 
chemicals or the importation of water that deprives 
others less powerful of that resource. Economics is 
the rationale for manipulating environments without 
acknowledgement of a wider ecology, both through 
actions and inertia. It is, of course, the raison d’etre 
of many planning departments and local authorities. 

Aesthetics: Otherwise known as the ability to 
recognise beauty, and to recreate it in that image. 

A number of speakers and property owners 
have recognised the hard decisions of satisfying 
personal taste or the allure of past styles, and the 
reality of gardening today, with the imperatives 
of working with climate change and in otherwise 
difficult conditions, some of which are economic, 
of course. I sympathise, indeed, empathise, 
somewhat illogically. I drool over books of Arts 
and Crafts gardens while waging battle against 
ivy and blackbirds on a 6o x 6o foot block in 
suburban Launceston; on our Mole Creek farm, 
the shrubbery is mowed indiscriminately by 
wallabies and topiaried by the occasional poddy 
lamb. The spring creek that borders the garden, 
fenced and re vegetated courtesy of a National 
Resource Management grant, is now so clogged with 
watercress since cattle no longer graze and pug its 
banks that I could probably redress the overdraft 
by supplying every restaurant in the state with this 
green, peppery invader. The ability to look afresh at 


a site and recognise its changing potential can only 
come about by looking in the mirror and recognising 
that a broader understanding of aesthetics, an 
historically and culturally informed extension of 
taste, must come into play, in concert with the 
practicalities of managing a landscape. 

Time: I have a personal peeve about the idea of the 
‘timeless’ garden (with apologies to Trisha Dixon 
and the many others who evoke this particular 
vision). What I have found often tacitly recognised 
in both the lectures and field trips is that time is a 
major issue for gardens, landscapes, trees, and their 
place in the broader landscape, built or otherwise. 
Time is integral to how we understand these places, 
whose histories we are attempting to retrieve or 
to bring to notice. We don’t all work on the same 
time. Tree time is not our time. The experience of 
human time is now more compressed, more intense, 
than ever. In the last few days we have looked at 
sites of great longevity, but with recent gardens, 
perhaps punctuated by the occasional venerable 
tree. It is clear that history is not about time, but is 
simply a series of markers of time ... periodisation. 
This understanding has huge implications for a 
garden history society. To lay out a new garden 
on a site of early non-Indigenous settlement 
should not be about historical re-creationism — no 
ball-and-chain gardeners, please — but about an 
emerging environmental responsibility, that is, to 
the environment in which you already operate, and 
the one you will create in the making of a garden. 

It is not about the romantic notion of inhabiting an 
imagined past, but about the equally romantic notion 
of a better future for that site. 

So, my final issue is history itself As we listened to 
talks ranging from the broadest historical brushstrokes 
to the tiniest isolated detail of a birdsong or a flower, it 
became clear to me that this society for garden history 







The Great Western Tiers — Kooparoona Niarato local Aboriginal people — form a dynamic backdrop to the Chudleigh Valley. 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 


17 


Jane Lennon 


attracts both the Wordsworthians and the Patersonians, 
those who nostalgically sniff the roses and those who 
see the past as worth recording, even as it rushes away. 
Garden historians are dealing with a most ephemeral 
of histories. We can look at garden plans, scan plant 
lists, identify the remains of hard landscaping, but 
it is most difficult to understand how a garden was 
used. Even the grandest gardens do not easily give 
up to us the information about how people lived in 
them, in the past. Of the simpler gardens of farm or 
suburb, almost nothing remains to tell us of how the 
vast majority of the population of settler societies 
lived. Population change and movement — through 
aspiration or desperation — sees the loss of cultural 
memory, the loss of a language for what I see as the 
most important aspect of gardens of the past: how we 
were when in them. Lucky is a family with a raconteur 
such as Kenneth von Bibra who can translate that past 
experience for us. Yet, as I said earlier, recording and 
memory are such subjective matters. 

We have been reminded many times over the 
duration of the conference, of the need to read the 
landscape, but this takes skill, knowledge, and 
imagination. It is about being open to possibilities. 

It is looking at how history has given us what we 
have in the here and now. It is gut feeling and 
access to a large database of information that had, 
until that very moment, seemed trivial. Much like 
gardening. Look in the mirror, and ask yourself: 


Should I place that here? Now? In this climate? 

In this place? Is there a better way? How will my 
actions be reflected in the future when they will be 
others’ history? 

But to conclude. Both Wordsworth and Paterson 
brought to us a vision splendid that is in the hands 
of youth — Wordsworth’s Youth ‘still as Nature’s 
priest’ ; Paterson’s Clancy an individual in harmony 
with the bush through which he moves. As youth, 
they look forward, into the future. Simultaneously, 
they are the future. Now, I don’t really want to 
comment on the demographic of this intellectual 
community, the Australian Garden History Society, 
but I must say this. We are simply custodians — this 
has been made clear in every talk we have heard, 
every garden we have visited, every young sapling 
we have seen, these protected from predators 
introduced and indigenous by a range of tree 
guards so varied and ingenious that they could be 
the subject of a book. So, consider the gardens of 
your children, your grandchildren. Think. Protect. 
Record. Act. That is what this conference has been 
about, in this special place, Tasmania. Reflect on 
the mirror of the self, the tree of life, and keep your 
vision splendid. 

Dr Deborah Malor is Graduate Research 

Coordinator, in the School of Visual & Performing Arts 

at the University of Tasmania. 


Reflections on the designed landscape 


We were invited to examine Governor Lachlan 
Macquarie’s ‘Vision Splendid’ two centuries on: 
‘the grand view and noble picturesque landscape 
that presented themselves on our first coming 
in sight of Launceston and the three rivers and 
fertile plains and lofty mountains by which they 
are bounded, were highly gratifying and truly 
sublime’ — and so it remains. 

Stimulating morning lectures were followed by 
bus tours through the rich cultural landscape, the 
most English corner of Australia with its hawthorn 
hedges, narrow lanes, stone fences, and Georgian 
houses surrounded by walled gardens and treed 
parks. European settlers occupied the fertile 
valleys along the principal rivers north of the 
dramatic rising walls of the Great Western Tiers. 
They found relatively treeless valleys, the result 
of centuries of firing by Aborigines to maintain 
hunting areas. 


Conflict or ‘collision with the natives’ inevitably 
followed the occupation of their hunting areas and 
grasslands, and the fortified stone barn complex 
at Old Wesley Dale in the Ghudleigh Valley built 
by Lieutenant Travers Hartley Vaughan between 
1829 1834 is an obvious testament to this 

period when the property was known as Native Hut 
Corner. Richard Dry’s estate of over 30,000 acres 
near Westbury was commenced in the 1820s and 
named Quamby, an Aboriginal name meaning ‘a 
camping place’ or ‘place of rest’. As Henry Reynolds 
reminded us in question time after his lecture, ‘the 
settler had to be self aware . . . steel yourself to what 
you were doing or go home’. In the 1850s Quamby 
was described as ‘very prettily situated in a large 
and well laid out park with handsome trees’ and in 
1887 there was a garden of ii acres. The main drive 
of nearly two kilometres still has large trees from 
the 1850s plantings — maritime pine, oaks, coastal 


18 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 


redwood, poplars, ash, and elms — and hawthorn 
hedges; our stroll along it in the mid-afternoon pale 
sunshine could have been in England. 

This was further reinforced by our visit to nearby 
Exton which was settled in 1820. Extensive 
hawthorn hedges bordered one-chain-wide laneways 
seemingly stretching to the Tiers and enclosing rich 
working farmland. Poplars, oaks, and elms bordered 
the main drive leading to the double storey house 
built in the 1840s. 

Captain Rolland of Port Macquarie fame explored 
the Ghudleigh valley in 1823 named its 
features; Gog and Magog, after the gate keepers 
to Paradise, for the high ground at the entrance to 
the valley; he gave his name to the highest peak 
at the end of the valley and called the next peaks 
Claude, after the great Erench landscape painter, 
and Van Dyke, after the portrait painter. By the 
end of the 1820s land grants were given for this 
valley and Native Hut Corner and Bentley were 
taken up. Native Hut Corner as we have noted 
became Wesley Dale in 1834 when Henry Reed 
purchased it. Reed’s estate extended over 6500 acres 
employing 84 people at its peak in the 1870s, with 
the home farm of approximately 2500 acres and 
the balance leased to tenant farmers. In 1873 Reed 
commissioned the construction of a grand residence, 
known then as Mountain Villa, and outbuildings 
(including a stone granary, coach house, and chapel), 
and used it as a summer house for holidays from 
his Eaunceston mansion Mount Pleasant. A giant 
macrocarpa hedge to the east of the house is the 
chief garden relic of this era, although eighty per 
cent of it has been removed. As the house was 
unoccupied from the 1930s until 1998 this hedge 
protected it from the elements and intruders. 


New beech and oak trees have been planted and 
a large fowl yard added interest for the garden 
visitors. At Old Wesley Dale a new garden was 
commenced by the Scotts in 2001 to the west of the 
fortified barn and features a terrace garden, walled 
kitchen garden, hedges (including box honeysuckle 
sculpted as an elephant hedge), and a ha ha between 
the stock paddock and garden. 

Similarly Bentley is an old estate from 1829 
by 1851 it had six miles of hawthorn hedges which 
are such a feature of its landscape today. The 
1879 homestead extended and modified forms 
the centre of the garden which now encompasses 
three lakes beyond the beautiful walls of local 
stone commissioned by John and Robyn Hawkins. 
Dolerite sculptures in the garden add close focal 
interest in a landscape designed to enhance the 
dramatic views to Captain Rolland’s mountain peaks. 

At Perth on the South Esk River the Gibson family 
still farm some 5000 acres including the estate 
of Scone surrounding Eskleigh homestead and 
the adjoining Native Point over the river. David 
Gibson, a former convict from Perth, Scotland, was 
given the ferry rights over the river by Macquarie 
on his 1821 tour and from there amassed his 
estate. His grandson William built Eskleigh in the 
1870s planting the trees that are a feature today; 
cedars, redwoods, maritime pines, Douglas and 
true firs, alternating with English deciduous trees. 
Restoration of trees along the drive into Eskleigh 
is a project of the Tasmanian branch of AGHS. 

Also in Perth is The Jolly Parmer Inn built in 1826 
with a two-storey brick stable. It had five old trees 
remaining in 1974 — plum, walnut, an ash, and two 
sycamores — but since then a superb garden with 
many shade-loving species under oaks, laurels. 



The conifers of Eskleigh, at Perth, form a living testament to keynote speaker Gwenda Sheridan’s paper The conifer connection’. 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 


19 


birches, almonds, and hazelnuts has been developed 
and a walled vegetable garden. 

The optional excursion on Monday cemented ‘the 
Vision Splendid’. We visited Mount Pleasant (i86os) 
in the company of Kenneth von Bibra, Henry Reed’s 
great grandson, seeing the hilltop estate complete 
with chapel and tomb ground and mature trees — a 
tree commemorating the AGHS visit was planted. A 
working sheep farm, Dunedin first granted in 1804, 
was visited. It has been in the Scott family since 
1878 and the current owner renovated the garden 
from 1973 again removing 28 huge, overshadowing 
macrocarpas and hedging the remainder for wind 
protection while developing a sweeping garden with 
wide beds including magnolias, chestnuts, birch, 
sorbus, dogwoods in gorgeous pink flower, maples, 
elderberries, and underplanting of euphorbias, 
hellebores, peonies, hostas, lily of the valley, and 
fritilarias. These are grown from seed in three 
glasshouses. The rare, eclectic botanical collection 
presented a harmonious garden but is was also 
pleasing to see over the garden wall that the cultural 
landscape sweeping down to the river valley still was 
pastoral in character. 

We lunched at Evandale in a large timber hall with 
beautiful roof trusses — originally part of Fallgrove 
estate, it was donated to the people of Evandale for 
their agricultural show held on this site from 1869 
until 1980. Warwick Oakman presented an excellent 
lecture on John Glover, whose bronze statue stands 
outside the hall in Falls Park. 

But the highlight was then travelling to Mills 
Plains nestled in the valley below Ben Eomond and 
stopping at the spot depicted in Glover’s painting 
of ‘My Harvest Home’ — the same flats, cattle, and 
outline of wooded hills. Eittle had changed in 175 
years except for a World War I memorial pine tree 
on the distinctive Pinner’s Peak. At Patterdale, 
Glover’s home farm, his son’s ‘Annotated panoramic 
plan of “Patterdale” farm’ (1835) — constructed 
with a Claude glass and camera obscura — allowed 
for accurate topographical reproduction of house, 
garden, and outbuildings. The beds from 1835 
with their associated earthworks, paths, boundary 
fence, gates, and sight lines survive intact and 
complete. Eucalypts depicted in these paintings 
remain as mature and over mature trees in the 
landscape, especially the distinctive manna/ 
ribbon gum pattern. This place is of extraordinary 
cultural significance to Australian painting and 
garden-making due to its intactness and purity in 
still presenting Glover’s art and landscape intent, 
its rarity in escaping later redevelopment, and for 


its record of continuity from the earliest colonial 
settlement. Without statutory heritage protection, 
the current owner is preserving the painter’s vale 
by joining Patterdale and Nile Farm into one farm 
in excess of 10,000 acres, rotating crops, removing 
weeds from watercourses, and replanting recent 
small logging areas. We visited Glover’s grave (1849) 
at the Nile Chapel, a beautifully simple Greek 
Revival structure said to have been designed by 
Glover. It sits solemnly in the landscape below 
ancient manna gums at Deddington. 

The final visit was to Dalness where the two-storey 
brick house, gardens, and curtilage are substantially 
as set out in the 1830s and now feature the exotic 
oaks, cedars, bunya pine, and other trees. The 
entrance drive, hawthorn hedges, century old fruit 
trees, and parkland have been renovated so that 
the setting is maintained. The owners, Mackinnon 
family, are the seventh generation providing a rare 
unbroken 190-year chain of ownership. 

Macquarie i 'Vision Splendid^ 
has survived: we are simply its 
current custodians 

National cultural values are protected through the 
National Heritage Fist, as occurred in 2008 with 
Woolmers and Brickendon, but these are the 
only two such landscapes protected in Tasmania. 
Many properties we visited are on the Tasmanian 
Heritage Register. It is both the passion for and 
love of these cultural landscapes by old families and 
newcomers with the means and appreciation that 
have maintained this heritage. The introduction 
of extensive poppy fields and eucalypt plantations 
needs to be carefully designed to sit in the 
landscape. Freeways and housing estates could 
bisect and/or otherwise sever the cultural links and 
sightlines of these colonial estates. There is no State 
planning policy to protect these cultural landscapes, 
no local historic tree register. Design guidelines, 
discussion, awareness-raising, further historical 
research, and financial grants for restoration of 
landscape elements like hedges, and willing workers 
under supervision are needed. Macquarie’s ‘Vision 
Splendid’ has survived: we are simply its current 
custodians and must make the next generation 
aware of this extraordinary inheritance and help 
equip them to protect and husband it. 

Dr Jane L. Lennon AM is a Brisbane-based heritage 
consultant with long experience in the assessment and 
management of designed landscapes. 


20 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 


32nd Annual National Conference, 
Maryborough, Queensland, 
19-22 August 2011 


Maryborough is the location for the Australian 
Garden History Society 32nd Annual National 
Conference, to be held from 19 to 22 August 2011. 
This beautiful city, on the banks of the Mary River, 
is about three hours north of Brisbane by car. The 
city has many fine nineteenth century buildings, 
reflecting its importance during the period 1850 to 
1900 when it was a busy port and an entry point 
for immigrants to Queensland. Since then it has 
continued as a regional centre sustained by sugar, 
timber, and heavy engineering. 

The climate is sub-tropical (the Tropic of 
Capricorn runs through Rockhampton, about 
300km north of Maryborough) and so the gardens 
contain palms, crotons, cordylines, and many other 
plants with coloured foliage. The buildings have 
verandahs and hoods over the windows to exclude 
the heat and light. 

Queensland’s climate differs from the southern 
states — it is hot, humid, and wet in summer, and 


pleasantly cool and dry in winter. Settlers quickly 
adapted their houses to these conditions and to the 
building materials to hand, in most places timber. 

Gardening was difficult, due to the need to grow 
plants that were not familiar to people from Europe, 
and the heat and rapid growth made maintenance 
difficult, leading to simplicity in design and the 
selection of hardy plants. Rapid growth can be 
followed by rapid decay, and untended gardens are 
quickly overgrown. Buildings too, especially those of 
timber, are attacked by rot and termites in the hot, 
wet climate, so good design and maintenance are 
essential if they are to last a century or more. 

There are gardens of interest in towns and in the 
countryside which are worthy of inspection and 
study. The conference will visit domestic gardens 
in Maryborough both large and small, and there 
will be opportunities to experience the ‘timber and 
tin’ housing style of colonial and later Queenslander 
houses. The conference will also take you into the 



Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 


21 



Maryborough hinterland to visit some cattle station 
homesteads and gardens which tourists usually do 
not see. 

The conference will be organised into three 
mornings of papers and three afternoons of garden 
visits, plus the optional day. The papers will be 
delivered in the Brolga Theatre, a large modern 
conference venue on a beautiful site overlooking the 
Mary River and next to Queens Park. 

On the first day the papers will explore 
Maryborough’s history and environment. Elaine 
Brown will tell the story of the region’s settlement: 
export of meat and wool from the hinterland, the 
gold rush at Gympie, immigration, sugar, and 
timber industries, and Walkers Engineering works. 
Malcolm Wegener and Jane Eennon will present 
the cultural landscapes of the sugar industry and 
Eraser Island respectively, and a garden owner 
will introduce some of the places we will see on 
the garden tours — some of the grand houses and 
gardens sited on the high bank of the River, and 
Queens Park, one of ten Queens Parks created in 
Queensland in the 1870s and 1880s. 

On Saturday morning Jerry Goleby- Williams will 
be the first speaker in a session which will explore 
how Europeans adapted to the land and the climate, 
especially in their gardens, but also in the design 
of their houses. Don Watson will describe the 
evolution of the Queenslander house and Stuart 
Read will tell the story of John Came Bidwill (for 


whom the Bunya pine. Araucaria bidwillii, was 
named), who lived and worked at Maryborough. 
Catherine Chambers will cover the social history 
of the domestication of the macadamia nut, which 
grows wild in the nearby ranges. Ken Brooks will 
talk about the role of Brennan and Geraghty’s store 
in supplying plants to Maryborough gardeners in the 
nineteenth century — this store is a National Trust 
property which we will visit in the afternoon. 

Sunday’s papers will start with Jeannie Sim 
discussing garden writing in Queensland, followed 
by Anne De Eisle talking about the restoration of 
Baddow Elouse and its garden, which we will visit in 
the afternoon. The remaining papers will be about 
garden plants — Bernadette Turner on Eangbecker’s 
Nursery, one of the largest nurseries in Queensland; 
Michael and Kyleigh Simpson on some old garden 
plants that are well suited to the drier future we 
face; and Glenn Cooke on Vida Eahey and her 
choice of species in her paintings of flowers. In 
the afternoon we will also visit Brooklyn House at 
Howard, 30km north of Maryborough, which has an 
engaging history and a reconstructed garden. 

Monday’s optional day programme will take us into 
the hinterland to see the gardens and homesteads of 
three cattle properties, and a flying visit to Broweena, 
an old sawmilling village. Catering will be by the 
property owners so expect country hospitality and 
cooking. The Queensland Branch looks forward to 
welcoming you to Maryborough in August. 

Fraser Island 

If you are coming to Maryborough it is easy to go 
on to visit Eraser Island, with its World Heritage 
listed sand hills, forests, lakes, and beaches. The 
Society has negotiated a tour for members after 
the conference with Kingfisher Bay Resort on 
Eraser Island. Travel by bus or your car from 
Maryborough to River Heads on the morning 
of Tuesday 23 August and catch the ferry to 
Kingfisher Resort. The tour includes whale 
watching on Hervey Bay and a trip to the tall 
trees, Wanggoolba Greek, Eake McKenzie, the 
ocean beach, and the wreck of the Maheno. The 
price includes all travel, accommodation, tours 
and meals (except for one lunch). 


A booking form for the 2011 Annual National 
Conference is enclosed with this journal — book 
early to avoid disappointment. 


22 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 



Victory for Mawallok— and for the 
protection of historic gardens 

Peter Watts 


In April— May last year a Panel Hearing was 
established by the Victorian Minister for Planning 
under the Planning and Environment Act 1987 to 
advise him about the proposed Stockyard Hill Wind 
Farm, 35 km west of Ballarat in Victoria’s Western 
District. The proposal was for 242 wind turbines 
over 156 sq km of rural land. 

One of the key issues was the impact the proposed 
wind farm would have on the northerly vista from 
Mawallok homestead. Somewhere between 20 and 
34 turbines, depending on the viewing point in the 
garden, had the potential to impact the view. These 
turbines were proposed to be a staggering 135m tall — 
or the approximate height of a 35 storey building. 

Mawallok is a significant house and garden, the 
latter designed by William Guilfoyle in 1909. 
Guilfoyle’s plan for the garden survives and shows 
very clearly that the main organising principle 


around which the garden was created was the 
northerly vista to the Pyrenees Ranges, and in 
particular Mount Cole, about 20 km to the north. As 
a consequence there was a groundswell of support 
to try and protect the vista critical to this important 
homestead and garden. Mawallok has a particular 
Australian Garden History Society connection 
having been opened a number of times for the 
Society and also having been the home to the first 
AGHS Alembership Officer, Alathea Russell, and 
later to AGHS Chair, Jocelyn Mitchell. 

A number of people gave expert evidence or 
oral presentations about this matter at the Panel 
Hearing. Those arguing in favour of the removal 
of all turbines in the primary vista included John 
Dwyer QC in his capacity as Chair of the AGHS, 
John Patrick, Dr Harriet Edquist, Bryce Raworth, 
and myself We argued very strongly that the garden 



This digital photographic simulation demonstrates the effect which the proposed wind turbines might have had on the on the vista from 
Mawallok garden. 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 


23 


Courtesy Scenic Spectrums Pty Ltd 



was of such importance, in a national context, that it 
deserved to have the vista preserved unencumbered 
by wind turbines. 

In my own evidence I described the view as 
sublime, admitting this was a term I would rarely 
use to describe an Australian garden. 

John Dwyer, on behalf of the AGHS, noted in his 
submission that: 

This vista is the key element of Guiljoyle’s design, 
enhanced by the addition of the lake, itself a 
landscape element very much in the Guilfoyle 
manner, with similarities to the lake in the Royal 
Botanic Gardens Melbourne . The garden forms 
part of and looks out over a significant cultural 
landscape. Properly understood, the vista is part of 
the designed landscape constituted by the garden. The 
landscape values are of national significance. 

He further noted that: 

The AGHS is, of course, not opposed to wind farms . 
It recognises that society must become less dependent 
on coal-fired power generation wind farms, and 
that wind farms are an important, perhaps even 
necessary development. But wind farms should be 
appropriately sited. It is simply not appropriate 
to allow wind towers to be imposed as a dominant 
feature into a significant cultural landscape. The 
Panel should do what it can to ensure that the impact 
on Mawallok is minimised. 

The Panel completed its report in August 2010 
and in late October the Minister advised he had 
accepted its recommendations in relation to 
Mawallok. This requires that ‘the 20 turbines visible 
within the central viewing cone from the Mawallok 
northern terrace be required to be deleted’. 

Whilst we would have preferred the turbines to 
have been removed from view from all parts of the 
garden (rather than just from the sightlines from the 


main terrace), it was, nevertheless, a very significant 
concession. 

In the words of the Panel: 

It is our view that the importance of the Mawallok 
house and garden and the nature and severity of the 
erosion of the cultural significance of the place are 
such that on balance this outweighs the benefits to the 
community of the development of those wind turbines 
which could have been seen in the central view 
from the Mawallok terrace and in particular their 
contribution to renewable energy. 

This represents a huge victory for Mawallok. It had 
been argued that, despite the fact that Mawallok 
itself had heritage protection, this protection did not 
extend beyond its boundaries. Critically the Panel 
noted: 

We arc conscious that the area affected by the view 
is not included in any heritage control itself ... 

We are not troubled by the absence of a statutory 
control over the vista, however. Gonsideration of 
the effects of use and development on one site upon 
another site is a fundamental element of planning 
decision-making and is supported in this case 
by the decision guidelines relevant to wind farm 
projects referring to the effects on views and vistas 
as well as cultural heritage. 

This has created an important precedent. It will 
henceforth be much harder to argue that vistas from 
important historic gardens can be ignored by those 
proposing major infrastructure developments. This 
represents a very significant victory, not just for 
Mawallok, but for the conservation of important 
historic gardens across Australia. 

Peter Watts AM is a former Chairman of the Australian 
Garden History Society National Management 
Committee and author of the first comprehensive survey 
of Victoria’s historic gardens (1980). 


Mawallok wind-turbine victory 

Jocelyn Mitchell writes thanking the Australian Garden History Society for its support in the fight to 
remove wind turbines from the Mawallok garden vista. ‘Both John Dwyer for the National Management 
Committee and Pamela Jellie for the Victorian Branch made written submissions and John additionally 
made a submission before the Panel Hearing. It is clear from the panel report that John’s oral submission 
made an impact on the panel and so was a significant input into its decision. A large number of AGHS 
members also made personal written submissions and my family would like to thank them all. My son 
and his wife will carry on the maintenance of the Mawallok garden, and, I am happy to say, will continue 
to share it with garden lovers and the community. Heartfelt thanks to you all.’ 


24 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 


Notes from a hillside villa 


Revisiting Villa Gamberaia 

This morning I had the pleasure of pouring over a 
beautiful folio edition of Giuseppe Zocchi’s Udute 
delle ville della Toscana, e altri luoghi della Toscana 
(1744) in the Bibliotecca Berenson — leather bound, 
gold embossed, marbled endpapers, delicious. I was 
seeking the view of Villa Gamberaia reproduced on 
the villa’s entry ticket, one of fifty popular prints of 
Tuscan villas made from Zocchi’s drawings. Such 
books were essential reading for any eighteenth- or 
nineteenth-century visitor on the Grand Tour. 

Early twentieth-century, English-speaking travellers 
on the other hand might have gathered inspiration 
from elegant works such as Edith Wharton’s Italian 
Villas and their Gardens { igog), the two-volume 
Country Eife publication The Gardens of Italy 
(1905) with photographs by Charles Eatham and 
descriptions by Evelyn March Phillips, or Geoffrey 
Jellicoe and John Shepherd’s Italian Gardens of the 
Renaissance with several later editions) and 
their Gardens and Design (1927). 

Two twenty-first century publications have greatly 
enhanced my recent visits to the Villa Gamberaia, 
both edited by historian of the Renaissance, Patricia 
J. Osmond. Both critically consider the same subject 
matter yet offer different treatment relative to 
the research they present. The first. Revisiting the 
Gamberaia (2004), introduced me to eighteenth- 
century prints and the twentieth century works 
about the Gamberaia. The second is a special issue 
of Studies in the History of Gardens and Designed 
Landscapes (2002) focused on the Villa Gamberaia. 

Revisiting offers a richly textured portrait of the 
garden at the Gamberaia and a historiography of its 
reception from the turn of the nineteenth century 
to the 1 970s. A collection of visitors’ impressions, 
observations, photographs, and drawings, with 
each essay and author contextualised by Osmond, 
the book is also a rather wonderful example of 
interpretation. It brings to life the wider socio- 
cultural context of a much-admired garden and the 
fascination it held for a selection of its notable visitors 
and neighbours. These members of an expatriate 
Anglo-Elorentine community — ‘the well read and the 
well bred’ as Katie Campbell neatly put it in Paradise 
of Exiles: the Anglo-American gardens of Florence 
(2009) — were linked by a shared passion for writing, 
acquiring art, cultivating gardens, entertaining, the 



pursuit of a country life of ease, and a desire (and the 
means) to escape the modern world. Eucky them ! 
Other visitors included professionals and students 
of architecture as well as the emerging academic 
discipline and profession of landscape architecture — 
Henry V. Hubbard, publishing in Eandscape 
Architecture in 1915, and Jellicoe and Shepherd, 
among them — whose works and, as a result, the Villa 
Gamberaia have since occupied an important place 
in studies of the history of gardens and designed 
landscapes, including in Australia. 

The special issue of Studies on the other hand 
brought to light then-new research on the Villa 
Gamberaia, from the iconography of its statuary, to 
the reception of the garden by significant historical 
figures, and the wider influence of the garden 
on landscape design in North America. While 
perhaps the suite of resources across both these 
volumes might not be available for every significant 
historic garden, the special issue of Studies offers 
a constructive reminder about being open to the 
prospect of new material coming to light — and 
acknowledging the potential for this material to be 
diverse and fragmentary in nature — no matter how 
seemingly well-studied, and the value of questioning 
received histories and opinions. 

So, as I continue my informal studies in Italian 
garden history, I plan to follow Georgina Masson’s 
advice in Italian Gardens {igbi) and revisit the 
Villa Gamberaia on a misty April day, ‘when the 
fresh spring green provides the perfect foil for the 
brilliance of the tulips, and again in the height of 
summer with the pink oleander blossom silhouetted 
against the brilliant blue sky’. 

Christina Dyson 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 


25 


Christina Dyson 



Review essay 


Plants from old catalogues 

Sooner or later garden historians want to know 
answers to questions about plant availability: What 
plants were available when? What should I replant 
about my 1930s cottage/ 1850s homestead? Much is 
available in contemporary accounts, published and 
unpublished, but three recent Australian sources 
make this task much easier to tackle. These are 
the August 2010— launched Hortus Camdenensis 
prepared by Colin Mills; the Colonial Plant 
Database, prepared by Colleen Morris and Tony 
Rodd; and the 2009 book by Margaret Brookes and 
Richard Barley, Plants Listed in Nursery Catalogues 
in Victoria 18^^— i88g. 

Hortus Camdenensis is an illustrated online 
catalogue of nearly 3300 plants grown by Sir William 
Macarthur at Camden Park, south-west of Sydney, 
between ^.1820 and 1861. It is by no means a 
finished project: Colin Mills has worked on it for the 
last decade and his research will continue. Emphasis 
is on ‘illustrated’ — this website has luscious images 
from (among other sources) Curtis’s Botanical 
Magazine depicting contemporary horticultural 
introductions and releases which caused a stir. These 
are so sharp they’re still exciting. 

Mills has patiently compiled this wonderful resource 
using the extensive Camden Park records of plants 
stocked and sold from its renowned nursery from 
about 1840, and from garden records (including 
letters, diaries, and notebooks) of the Macarthur 
family from the 1820s onwards concerning other 
plants in the extensive garden. These include Cape 
bulbs and coral trees first hybridised at Camden — 
some of if not Australia’s earliest hybridised garden 
plants (see, for instance, Richard Clough’s article 
‘Mr Bidwill’s Erythrina’, in AGH, 3 (4), 1992). Also 
on the website are notes regarding nomenclature 
(much changed since the 1820s); influential people 
such as gardener Edmund Blake; essays by Mills, 
for example on laying out an orchard in colonial 
Australia, wine growing and production at Camden 
Park, gesneriads, gloxinias, and fuchsias; and many 
references (including many copyright-free images 
which allow this Hortus to be so ‘visual’). The 
database is at <www.hortuscamden.com> and is 
hosted by Colin Mills and Nick Caldwell. 

The broader Colonial Plants Database contains 
over 11,000 plants available pre-1860 in New 
South Welsh nurseries or key gardens. Available at 


<www.hht.net.au/research/coloniaLplants> this 
website is hosted by the Historic Houses Trust of 
New South Wales. Key sources include primary 
documentation relating to Sydney Botanic Gardens, 
Alexander Macleay’s extensive Elizabeth Bay 
garden, the nursery at Camden Park, and the 
commercial Sydney nurseries of John Baptist, the 
Shepherd family (Darling Nursery), and Michael 
Guilfoyle (Exotic Nurseries). I use this source every 
week — it allows rapid answers to questions such as: 
‘When did weeping willows get to Australia?’, ‘What 
conifers were available in the 1840s?’, or ‘Which 
persimmon or pear was for sale in the 1850s?’ How 
delicious to find that today’s dreaded lantana dates 
from 1839 in Macleay’s garden, camphor laurels 
were sent to Sydney’s botanic garden in 1827, 
raspberries were enjoyed by Mrs Macarthur in 1816, 
Pinus canariensis was for sale in 1 845 from Camden 
Park, and so on. Clues are rapidly coming to mind 
about who was donating plants, seeds, or cuttings 
to whom: dates of introduction or cultivation giver 
clearer ideas of links — interstate and local. 

Clues are rapidly coming to mind about 
who was donating plants , seeds, or 
cuttings to whom 

This database is also a work-in-progress — 
progressive checking of listings occurs against 
original sources, editorial additions (such as historical 
and taxonomic notes) are systematically being 
made, and where possible botanical illustrations 
from contemporary publications are being included. 
When this is complete, further listings will be added 
from time to time. Vegetables and esculent plants 
are current gaps and priorities. This depends on 
additional research and editing being completed 
and checked. Only a portion, for example, of the 
Guilfoyle catalogue has been added. Similarly, 
listings from John Baptist’s nursery, ‘The Market 
Garden’, Bourke Street, Sydney (1861), and 
Macleay’s horticultural notebooks have only been 
partially completed. 

Victoria too is well served in this area. A sell-out when 
it was first published in 1992, Margaret Brookes and 
Richard Barley’s Plants Listed in Nursery Catalogues 
in Victoria i8§§— i88g has been recently republished 
(2009) by the Garden Plant Conservation Association 
of Australia. This substantial, spirally bound book 
(ISBN 978 o 646 50551 o) lists plants sold by a 


26 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 



range of key nurseries (numbering 23 in all) 
including Kardinia, Victoria Seed Warehouse, 
Royal Nurseries (Hawthorn), and the St 
Kilda Nurseries (Brunnings) — others such as 
JJ. Rule (1855) add depth. The focus is on 
the ornamental garden rather than on food 
plants of the kitchen garden and agriculture. 
Much updating of botanical nomenclature 
has been since the 1992 edition, which itself 
offered a wonderful list of synonyms and such 
careful checking and cross-referencing is a 
feature of this publication. It is both salutary 
and rather discouraging to note whole pages 
of ‘lost’ cultivars of petunias, pelargonia, 
roses, bouvardias, fuchsias, and ferns. Fashion 
has a lot to answer for today: the selection at 
Woolworths or Runnings is a pale shadow of 
our horticultural smorgasbord of a century or 
century-and-a-half ago. Go ponder! 

Using these regularly — in conjunction with 
Margaret Hibbert’s wonderful, out-of-print 
but still useful The Aussie Plant Finder (which 
contains an A— Z of plant species and of 
nurseries growing them) or the NSW Heritage 
Branch’s Sources of Old-fashioned Plants 
list (available online at <www.heritage.nsw. 
gov.au/06_subnav_ 1 0.htm> and compiled by 
your reviewer) — means that much can be 
understood and still, to some extent, much can 
be sourced and re-grown, ensuring authenticity 
and past richness is available today. Make use 
of these and chase a copy of both books. 

Of course these point up the usefulness of 
compiling parallel guides for other states. In 
Tasmania, Gwenda Sheridan’s work on the 
Royal Society of Van Diemen’s Land and 
the Launceston Horticultural Society show 
the riches of these societies’ records. Botanic 
gardens and early nurseries in Queensland, 
South Australia, and Western Australia offer 
similar potential — if ready volunteers emerge. 

Stuart Read AM is a landscape architect, 
horticulturist, and historian with particular 
interests in the origins and movement of plants 
around the globe. Trained in New Zealand, he 
finds old gardens more interesting than new 
ones, and full of useful lessons. 


Margaret Brookes and Richard Barley’s Plants 
Listed in Nursery Catalogues in Victoria i 8 yy— 
i 88 g (2009) is available for purchase via the 
AGHS website for $30. 



R Renaissance 

Tours 


GARDENS, art 
CULTURE 

AROUND THE WORLD 


A SELECTION OF OUR 2011 TOURS: 


FOR DETAILED INFORMATION CALL 1300 121 095 
OR VISIT www.renaissancetours.com.au 


GREAT GARDENS 
OF SCOTLAND 


WEST COAST & SKYE 


INVERNESS & HIGHLANDS 
ABERDEENSHIRE 
EDINBURGH & GLASGOW 


Discover some of the world's most 
famous gardens at the peak of the 
summer bloom. Plus Scottish 
history, heritage and hospitality. 


04-20 April 2011 


CHINA IN THE 
SPRING 

SHANGHAI & NANJING 
SUZHOU & HANGZHOU 
YELLOW MOUNTAINS 
BEIJING 

A thorough exploration of Chinese 
gardens combined with the many 
wonders of this extraordinary 
country, ancient and modern. 


12-30 May 2011 


FROM THE VENETOI^ M|S^v 
TO VIENNA ^ 

ITALY CROATIA - 1 

SLOVENIA AUSTRIA L K H 

Gardens, villas, art, music, food and -^ 2 - ’ 

wine! From Italy to Austria with ^ Lv - -s 

Holly Kerr Forsyth via the Adriatic s ' 

Riviera and the Julian Alps. 

Photo courtesy Holly Kerr Forsyth 




June 2011 (15 days) 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 


27 






For the bookshelf 


Alison Halliday & Joanne Hambrett,A Passion for 

Place: gardens of the Blue Mountains, Bloomings 

Books, Melbourne, 20 10 (ISBN 9781876473778): 

242pp, hardback, RRP $59.96 

(available from the AGHS for $44 plus postage 

<www,gardenhistorysociety,org,au>) 

This fine new book, realised with the support of the 
Australian Garden History Society, celebrates what 
is arguably the finest group of private gardens in 
New South Wales, with a major public one (Mount 
Tomah Botanic Garden) alongside. 

The three mountain tops — Wilson, Irvine, and 
Tomah — can be distantly glimpsed from Sydney, 
part of the Blue Mountains to the west. Favoured 
from the 1870s onwards as cool mountain retreats 
from the heat of a Sydney summer, they were much 
more than that: places of rich soil, better rainfall, 
and real elevation, where plants requiring conscious 
seasonal change could thrive. 

The first settlers at Mount Wilson — who included 
my in-law. Judge Matthew Henry Stephen — were 
also entranced by the lush native forest that densely 
covered the land, but quickly decided that they 
needed to make their own mark, ‘civilising’ the 
clearings around their houses with gravelled paths 
and tiled borders, shrubs clipped to resemble plum 
puddings, and the residual tree ferns entwined with 
ivy to suggest strange bottle-like shapes. 

Almost immediately, a serious commitment to 
advanced horticulture came to the fore. It was a 
time of the sophisticated amateur, so connections 
with the Sydney Botanic Gardens and prominent 
plant hunters were used to gain rare and unusual 
plants which continue to give these mountain 
gardens a special status. 

we hear individual voices and points 
of view, and these give a wonderful 
personal dimension to the story 

On reflection, it seems remarkable that this is 
the first significant book on this topic. Alison 
Halliday and Jo Hambrett’s depth of research 
over many years means that this is an invaluable 
record. Thoughtful introductions by Peter Valder 
and Peter Watts set the scene, and Ian Brown’s 
remarkable photographs convey the exquisite 
nuances of the general landscape, and of each 


garden. Garden photography is a very special 
craft, and I don’t believe these images could be 
bettered. Another aspect of the book I particularly 
like is the quotations from the garden owners. 
Through these we hear individual voices and 
points of view, and these give a wonderful personal 
dimension to the story. 

Deep-down, real gardeners are almost universally 
good people, pleased to share their pleasures and 
successes with others. This comes across in the 
book, where virtually everyone — doubtless charmed 
and cajoled by Alison and Jo — were generous with 
input and access. They have concentrated on the 
focal points for, in truth, the gardens of the Blue 
Mountains are rather more numerous and far-flung. 

Deep-down, real gardeners are 
almost universally good people, 
pleased to share their pleasures and 
successes with others 

The book also represents an expression of the 
growth of interest in serious gardening and garden 
design over the past 35 years. I have fond memories 
of working with Bruce Mackenzie in 1970, when 
his was the only full-time landscape design office in 
Sydney, and I also recall the wonderful, modest but 
real, financial support provided by Dame Elisabeth 
Murdoch which enabled the Australian Garden 
History Society to get properly established. 

Splendid entities such as this collection of fine 
gardens only survive through ongoing private 
enthusiasms and vigilance. Part of the wonder of 
these mountaintops is that they remain remote 
and have never been allowed to be suburbanised. 
Hopefully the wild terrain and the extensive 
National Parks will help preserve the special nature 
of the place. 

This book confirms the splendid qualities of these 
three mountains and their gardens. A Passion for 
Place represents a bench-mark in Australian garden 
history for books covering regional gardens. 

Howard Tanner 

Howard Tanner, a Sydney architect, was an early 
Chairman of the Australian Garden History Society 
and wrote on the gardens of Mount Wilson in his book 
The Great Gardens of Australia (1976). 


28 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 



Recently released 


Myles Baldwin, Ruro/Austro//an Gardens, Murdoch 

Books, Millers Point, NSW, 2010 (ISBN 

978 1 74 1 964707): 288 pp, hardback, RRP $89.95 

Many old favourites in this survey along with some 
less well-known treats, all beautifully photographed 
by Simon Griffiths. Whilst the bounds of historical 
knowledge are rarely challenged here, Baldwin’s 
breezy prose and deft garden selections have plenty 
of potential for future garden historians, capturing 
a snapshot of early twenty-first century concerns 
amongst a diverse group of highly motivated, rural 
Australian gardeners.. 

Tony Hall, The Life and Death of the Australian 
Backyard, CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood,Vic., 

2010 (ISBN 9780643098169): I76pp, paperback, 
RRP $69.95 

The Australian backyard is taken for granted — its 
historical origins here treated succinctly — yet this 
environmental and sociological survey demonstrates 
that its form, functions, traditions, and meanings 
are under threat, its size shrinking (dramatically 
demonstrated with aerial photographs) and its role 
changing. Hall challenges our planning systems and 
offers suggestions for future policy directions that 
acknowledge the backyard’s significance. 

Rebecca Jones, Green Harvest: a history of organic 
farming and gardening in Australia, CSIRO Publishing, 
Collingwood,Vic., 2010 (ISBN 9780643098374): 
208pp, paperback, RRP $49.95 

Commencing with the coalescence of interest in 
the 1 940s of Australian growers in organic farming 
and gardening methods, the author groups her raw 
material around four themes — ‘Soil’, ‘Chemical 
free’, ‘Ecological wellbeing’, and ‘Back to the 
Land’. With a focus on personal stories rather than 
public perceptions, each theme is represented by 
a case study (from post-war farmer Harold White 
to contemporary gardening author Jackie French). 
Imaginatively researched and lucidly presented. 

Michael Pearson & Jane Lennon, Pastoral Australia: 
fortunes, failures & hard yakka; a historical overview 
1788-1967, CSIRO Publishing in association 
with the Department of the Environment, 

Water, Heritage and the Arts and the Australian 
Heritage Council, Collingwood, Vic., 2010 (ISBN 
9780643096998): 232 pp, paperback, RRP $69.95 

Australia’s garden history and her pastoral history 
have enjoyed a long association, with the fortunes 
of the latter impressing strongly on the former; 
both thrived on water, settled land, and favourable 


seasons. Pearson and Lennon — both experienced 
heritage consultants — have undertaken a great 
service in this thematic history, synthesising a vast 
range of material in a comprehensive and truly 
national framework. 

Libby Robin, Chris Dickman, & Mandy Martin 
(eds). Desert Channels: the impulse to conserve, 

CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Vic., 20 1 0 
(ISBN 9780643097490): 352pp, hardback, 

RRP $59.95 

This detailed survey brings together the work 
of a large and diverse group of researchers, 
managers, and custodians, all working towards the 
conservation of a harsh landscape at the south- 
west corner of Queensland, one of channels and 
flood plains juxtaposed with immense sand dunes, 
distant physically and mentally from the populous 
eastern seaboard. The reader is left with a sense of 
inherent complexity but also of hope for enhanced 
understanding and prudent stewardship. 

Clare A.P.Willsdon, /mpress/on/st Gardens, published 
by National Galleries of Scotland, Edinburgh, 

2010 (ISBN): available directly from the Retail 
Department, National Galleries of Scotland 
<retail@nationalgalleries.org> for £20 postage 
inclusive (please mention Australian Garden History 
to take advantage of this offer) 

Based on a touring exhibition of the same name, this 
beautifully illustrated book showcases Impressionist 
garden paintings from the 1870s— 1910s (with a 
selection of earlier and later works for context). 
Although a strong art history case is presented 
for the ‘Impressionist garden’, this book perhaps 
unwittingly reinforces the need for further 
garden history scholarship in a neglected area — 
internationally as well as for an Australian context. 

John Wrigley & Murray Fagg, Eucalypts: a celebration, 
Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest, NSW, 2010 (ISBN 
978 1 74 1 759242): 352 pp, hardback, RRP $65 

There’s a lot to like about this book from two 
doyens of Australian flora: accessible presentation, 
lively text, crystal-clear images, concisely presented 
botanical information (sensibly grouped in an 
appendix), and wide-ranging enquiry. The cultural 
history presented is largely a story of appropriation 
across a diverse spectrum, although the history of 
garden usage presented here is diffuse, perhaps due 
to the paucity of detailed research on this critical 
question in Australian garden history. 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 


29 



Jottanda 


Australian convict sites 

Eleven Australian convict sites have recently 
been collectively inscribed as a cultural site on 
the World Heritage List by the United Nations 
Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization 
(UNESCO). Intended to represent Australia’s 
convict heritage, the listing includes several gardens 
and designed landscapes associated with convict 
activities, including Old Government House and 
Domain (within Parramatta Park), Port Arthur 
historic site (including the Commandant’s garden), 
the Tasmanian estates Brickendon and Woolmers, 
Kingston and Arthur’s Vale historic area on Norfolk 
Island, and Hyde Park Barracks (including the 
forecourt and barrack yard). Vigilance is needed, 
though, in the face of development pressures which 
could adversely affect these outstanding significant 
sites or their contexts, 
whc.unesco.org/en/list 

Documenting Hallgreen 

In addition to organising the very successful 
Launceston conference, AGHS Tasmanian 
Branch members have also been investigating and 
documenting the significant garden of Hallgreen at 
New Norfolk. Read about this fascinating project 
in the latest issue of Tasmania 40° Souths 58 
(Spring 2010). 
www.fortysouth.com.au 

NSW Heritage Volunteer Awards 

Congratulations to recipients of the recent New 
South Wales Heritage Volunteer Awards. Amongst 
those whose work involved garden and landscape 
history we might enumerate Dr James Broadbent, 
well known for his research and his work in 
conserving Cox’s Cottage at Mulgoa; Emma Brooks- 
Maher, a tireless worker in the recognition and 
protection of Haberfield, Australia’s seminal garden 
suburb; Kath Smith, a valued volunteer for the 
Eriends of Eagan Park; Long Swamp Cemetery 
Volunteers, whose dedicated work 50km south 
of Bathurst has transformed this once-neglected 
cemetery; the Bodalla 150 Committee, whose work 
celebrates the sesqui-centenary of Thomas Mort’s 
model dairy farm and village; and Penelope Pike, a 
deeply committed and active volunteer at Eryldene. 
Penny is an AGHS member and gave a collective 
speech on behalf of all recipients, making a plea for 
additional ‘small grant’ fund allocations by state and 
local government bodies.). 


Historic Gardens of Perth 

In May 2011 the Western Australian Branch of 
the Australian Garden History Society will hold a 
photographic exhibition ‘Historic Gardens of Perth’ 
in the ground floor exhibition space of the Perth 
Town Hall. The exhibition will run from 13 to 24 
May. 

‘Historic Gardens of Perth’ will cover a selection 
of Perth gardens including plant nurseries, market 
gardens, private pleasure gardens and public 
parks, most of them within the city precinct. By 
highlighting many largely unknown gardens, the 
exhibition will provide an overview of horticultural 
practice and changing trends that resulted from 
the growth and development of the city. As well 
as showcasing private gardens, it will look at the 
role played by key public official and municipal 
gardeners, who, in guiding plant selection and 
garden design, laid the foundations of many current 
city streetscapes. 

The exhibition, which is being funded by the WA 
Branch and the AGHS National Management 
Committee, with generous assistance from the City 
of Perth, will promote the importance of parks 
and gardens in the history of Perth. Much of the 
supporting research and material of this significant 
part of the city’s cultural heritage has not been 
viewed by the broader public, and will be brought 
together for the first time. Held to commemorate 
the twenty-first anniversary of the WA Branch, the 
exhibition aims to raise awareness of the role and 
work of the Society in the local community, and 
will draw on the research and curatorial expertise of 
John Viska, Lisa Williams, Elizabeth Hof, Gillian 
Lilleyman, and Ruth Morgan. 

After the exhibition closes, research and graphic 
display material will be donated to the local studies 
collection at the City of Perth Library, expanding 
and extending the material’s accessibility to the 
general public. 

Curious Colony 

Due to popular demand the exhibition ‘Curious 
Colony’, curated by Newcastle Region Art Gallery 
(catalogue reviewed in our last issue), is now on 
view in Sydney at the S.H. Ervin Gallery until 
20 Eebruary 2011. 
www.nationaltrust.com.au 


30 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 



Lorrie Lawrence (1938-2010) 

Victorian Branch members were saddened to learn 
recently of the death of Irma Lorraine Lawrence. 
Better known to all as Lorrie, she was a keen AGHS 
member with professional interests in garden design 
and journalism. Her life and career are summarised 
in Anne Latreille’s obituary, published in The Age, 

28 December 2010. 

Bellfield photographs 

In the recent article on Bellfield by Carol Liston 
{AGH 22 (i), 2010), we were pleased to include 

Dialogue 

Leach’s leaf morphology exposed 

Richard Nolan writes from Adelaide following our 
editorial on Sam Leach’s painting Proposal for a 
Landscaped Cosmos {AGH, 22 (i), 2010): ‘I am 
undertaking university studies for my graduate 
diploma in art history, and am also professional 
horticulturist, having had a career spanning twenty 
five years with Botanic Gardens of Adelaide. 

My immediate impression of Leach’s painting was 
that it was atypically Australian. While the habit 
and bark characteristics of the deciduous tree 
depicted may have been similar to the Southern 
beeches {Nothofagus sp.) with distribution from 
Tasmania to South America, the leaf structure 
and shape in his painting are not those of beeches 
{Fagus and Nothofagus spp.) but that of European 
oak {Quercus sp.) a genus confined to the northern 
hemisphere. 

While beeches and oaks are in the same botanical 
family Fagaceae, it is obvious to me that Leach 
has copied the oak leaf structure directly from 
the seventeenth-century Dutch landscape work 
by Adam Pynacker, Any art critic or judge unless 
botanically trained or self taught may not pick 
up the subtleties in the different leaf structure 
and morphology between northern and southern 
hemisphere flora, whereas I can ! The mountainous 
landscape in Leach’s painting could at a glance be 
representative of Tasmania, but the vegetation 
depicted is definitely not Australian. 

Deciduous beech {Fagus sp.) and oak, both 
deciduous and evergreen {Quercus sp.) occur 
across North America, Europe, Asia, and Japan, 
while Southern beech, mostly evergreen and 


some photographs taken by Daphne Kingston of the 
property in the late 1990s. The co-editors apologise 
that the image with the spiky agave on page 8 was 
mis-credited and should also have acknowledged 
Daphne Kingston. We thank Stuart Read for 
reminding us of the value and breadth of artist 
and author Daphne Kingston’s work in recording 
aspects of western Sydney’s disappearing cultural 
heritage — in particular slab farm buildings and 
other vernacular architecture across the Cumberland 
Plain — much of which might otherwise have 
disappeared from the record. 


semi-deciduous {Nothofagus sp.) occur in Chile, New 
Zealand, Tasmania, Victoria, and New South Wales. 
A single evergreen species Nothofagus moorei is 
found in northern NSW and southern Queensland. 

The best known of the Southern beeches 
in Australia is the myrtle beech {Nothofagus 
cunninghamii), so named because of its small, glossy, 
myrtle-shaped, evergreen leaves. One species in 
Tasmania is the much shorter and but shrubbier, 
less common, deciduous Nothofagus gunnii, locally 
known as ‘Tanglefoot’, 

Thomas Shepherd’s sons 

Richard Clough writes from Sydney: ‘I enjoyed the 
July— September issue of the journal especially Carol 
Eiston’s article. Shepherd’s two eldest sons came 
with the party [i.e. to New Zealand in 1825 
then to Sydney two years later] and were still about 
when he drew up his will. It would be interesting to 
find out what happened to them. He was, or rather 
appears to have been, unusually hard on them. 
There must be some story worth unearthing.’ 

Blue Gum 

A number of interstate members have expressed 
interest in obtaining copies of Blue Gum, the 
newsletter of the Tasmanian Branch of the 
Australian Garden History Society. Blue Gum 
incorporates articles as well as programme 
information and is produced in quality hard copy. 

It is not on the web, but we plan to include a list 
of contents of the AGHS web site. Copies can 
be obtained for a small fee to cover production 
and postage ($5) by contacting Ivan Saltmarsh at 
<ivanof@bigpond.com> or (03) 6227 8515. 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 


31 



Society news 


Subscriptions 

Although the National Management Committee 
never likes to increase membership fees, the cost 
of membership has not increased since 2007. 
Membership fees cover the cost of producing 
our wonderful journal but only a portion of 
administration costs and we rely on profits from 
conferences and tours to top up the cost of 
administration. We do need to keep abreast of 
the rise of the costs over the past three years and 
therefore revised fees recently set by the NMG are 
listed on page 2. 

Your AGHS membership also supports the 
important advocacy and research work this 
respected organisation does on behalf of garden 


history in Australia at both a national and branch 
level. Members enjoy receiving and reading the 
journal and having the opportunity to attend 
stimulating national conferences and tours, and the 
many and varied informative and social activities, all 
of which the NMC and all local branches strive to 
provide for members. 

Packers for last journal 

Thanks to those who assisted with packing our last 
issue of the journal: Diana Ellerton, Fran and Mai 
Paul, Anna Howe, Pamela Jellie, Jane Johnson, 
Rosemary Kiellerup, Laura Lewis, Sandra Torpey, 
Georgina Whitehead. 


Continued from page 15 


Flockton made several hundred quarto drawings 
of Opuntia species from the plantation at the 
Botanic Gardens, Sydney. Fourteen articles on 
the opuntia, illustrated with her fold-out coloured 
plates, were published in the Agricultural Gazette of 
New South Wales (1911 — 17). Flockton was invited 
to contribute botanical drawings to other projects 
outside the Gardens, in Queensland, the Northern 
Territory, and Victoria. She was, for example, one 
of a group of botanical illustrators employed to 
work in conjunction with Dr Ethel McLennan, the 
distinguished plant scientist at the University of 
Melbourne.^ She also painted wildflower borders 
for studies of butterflies in Dr Riches in his Scenic 
Gems of Australia. Another private endeavour was 
her book of a series of twelve paintings of Australian 
Wild Flowers published by the New South Wales 
Bookstall Company in 1908. These images were 
subsequently published as lithographs and postcards 
in five or more formats for the next decade. An 
unpublished album of delicate illustrations of lichen 
is held by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Sydney. After 
her retirement, Margaret Flockton wrote a series of 
children’s stories, which although unpublished are 
now held by Sydney’s Mitchell Library. 

The name Margaret Flockton, once known to 
only a few people outside the Sydney Botanic 
Gardens, has now become widely known throughout 
the world, thanks to the international Margaret 
Flockton Award for Scientific Botanical Illustration, 
an award initiated by botanical artists at the 


Royal Botanic Gardens, Sydney. She is also justly 
acclaimed throughout the world of scientific botanic 
illustrators, artists, collectors, and plant lovers 
and her published botanical drawings remain an 
important resource for all lovers of Australian flora. 


REFERENCES 

1 For information on the Flockton family I am indebted 
to Louise Wilson’s unpublished manuscript on her 
family history. 

2 ‘Margaret Lilian Flockton’, Dictionary of Australian 
Artists Online <www.daao.org.au>, accessed i/i/i i. 

3 J.H. Maiden to Under Secretary, 24 August 1909, 
letter book A17, Royal Botanic Gardens, Sydney. 

4 Helen Hewson, yoo Years of Botanical Illustration., 
CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Vic., 1999, p.i6o. 

5 Norman Hall, Botanists of the Eucalyptus^ CSIRO, 
Melbourne, 1978 (quoted in Hewson). 

6 The Sydney Electronic Text and Image Service <http:// 
setis . library, usyd . edu . au/ oztexts/botany. html>, 
accessed i/i/ii. 

7 Joan Kerr (ed.), Heritage: the national women’s art book. 
Craftsman House, Roseville East, NSW, 1995, p.178. 


Pamela Bell is an art historian. After teaching art 
history at the University of New South Wales she 
became the first Curator of the University of Sydney 
Art Collection where she also reinstated and ran the 
University of Sydney Art Gallery. She is now an 
independent curator and art valuer. 


32 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 




Diary dates^ 


FEBRUARY 20 1 1 

Exploring Government House grounds 

Victoria 
Tuesday 8 

An escorted walk and talk in the Government House 
grounds, followed by a BYO picnic tea. Meet at the 
gates in Government House Drive (Melway 2F, K 1 1) 
at 6pm. 

Soil fungi and microbial action 

Sydney and Northern NSW 
Thursday 10 

Biologist Dr Peter McGee will speak about revitalising 
degraded soils, for instance those in ex-industrial 
sites becoming public parks. 6pm for 6.30— 8.30pm, 
Annie Wyatt Room, National Tmst Centre. Cost: 

$20 members, $30 non-members. Bookings essential. 
For bookings and enquiries contact Jeanne Villani on 
(02) 9997 5995 orjeanne@villani.com 

New Holland from a botanical 
perspective 

West Australia 
Friday 11 

Lecture by Dr Michael McCarthy entitled ‘The 
Exploration of New Holland: a botanical perspective’. 
Details to be confirmed. For information contact 
Caroline Grant via email on chhgrant@yahoo.com 

Historic garden visits 

Tasmania 
Sunday 20 

Historic garden visits including Marlbrook near 
Pontville. Details to be confirmed. For further 
information contact Liz Kerry via email on 
liz.kerry@keypoint.com.au 

Morning talk for armchair travellers 

Victoria 
Thursday 24 

Committee members will share their garden discoveries 
on their travels in 2010. Kathy Wright visited 27 small 
gardens in public spaces in New York, Pamela Jellie 
took a tour of Frank Lloyd Wright’s Fallingwater in 
Pennsylvania, and John Dwyer, whilst in the UK, 
visited Snowshill Manor and a Baroque garden in the 
Cotswolds. roam. Domain House, Dallas Brooks Drive, 
South Yarra. Cost: gold coin donation. 


MARCH 20 1 1 

The Resource of Landscape forum 

West Australia 
Saturday 12 

Landscape forum at The University Club of Western 
Australia, entitled ‘The Resource of Landscape’, 
which will include a presentation by Richard Aitken 
on ‘The Garden of Ideas’. Details to be confirmed. 

For information contact Caroline Grant via email on 
chhgrant@yahoo.com 

Flora of Sydney's Cumberland Plain 

Sydney and Northern NSW 
Wednesday 16 

Talk by ecologist Dr Doug Benson on the diverse 
and threatened flora of Sydney’s Cumberland Plain, 
which he has documented over two decades and 
which is facing both habitat loss and some revival. 

6pm for 6. 30-8. 30pm, Annie Wyatt Room, National 
Trust Centre. Cost: $20 members, $30 non-members. 
Bookings essential. For bookings and enquiries contact 
Jeanne Villani on (02) 9997 5995 orjeanne@villani.com 

The Garden of Ideas 

Queensland 
Sunday 20 

Lecture by author and curator Richard Aitken 
showcasing the touring exhibition ‘The Garden of 
Ideas’. Date, venue, and other details to be advised to 
branch members closer to the event. 

Tour of the Bulla and Sunbury region 

Victoria 
Sunday 20 

Bus tour of the Bulla/Sunbury region, which will 
include a visit to Woodlands Homestead, the Alister 
Clark Memorial Rose Garden, and Rupertswood 
Mansion. 9am, Victorian Arts Centre, St Kilda Road, 
Melbourne. Cost: $85. Booking details are included on 
a flyer enclosed with the journal. 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 


33 












Gould's book of plants 

Victoria 
Thursday 24 

A lecture on Gould’s book of plants by Associate 
Professor Hamish Maxwell-Stewart and Eleanor Cave. 
This lecture enthralled members at the Launceston 
Conference so we are pleased to have it presented 
again in Melbourne. 6pm for 6.30pm lecture in 
Mueller Hall, The Herbarium, Birdwood Ave., 

South Yarra. Cost: $15 members, $20 non-members, 

$5 students with student card. Enquiries to Pamela 
Jellie (03) 9836 1881. 

APRIL 201 1 

Historic qardens around Campbell 
Town 

Tasmania 

Early April (to be confirmed) 

Historic gardens and houses will be visited in the 
Campbell Town area, including Rosedale. Details to be 
confirmed. Eor further information contact Liz Kerry 
via email on liz.kerry@keypoint.com.au 

Kokoda Track Memorial walk 

Sydney and Northern NSW 
Sunday 3 

Walk among the ambitious plantings and memorials 
commemorating Australian WWII service men and 
women in Papua New Guinea, on the Kokoda Track 
Memorial walk. Bedlam Bay Park, Concord West. 
2-4pm, meeting place to be advised on booking. Cost: 
$15 members, $25 non-members. Bookings essential. 
Eor bookings and enquiries contact Jeanne Villani on 
(02) 9997 5995 orjeanne@villani.com 

Cottesloe Civic Centre 

West Australia 
Sunday 10 

Talk by Ann Eorma on the Landscape Management 
Plan for the Cottesloe Civic Centre. Details to be 
confirmed. Eor information contact Caroline Grant via 
email on chhgrant@yahoo.com 

MAY 201 1 

The Garden of Ideas 

ACT /Monaro /Riverina 
Thursday 12 

Lecture by author and curator Richard Aitken 
showcasing the touring exhibition ‘The Garden of 
Ideas’. Venue: National Library of Australia; time and 
other details to be advised to branch members closer to 
the event. 


Historic Gardens of Perth exhibition 

West Australia 

Wednesday 11-Wednesday 25 
This exhibition featuring early Perth gardens will be 
held in the foyer of the Perth Town Hall. Details to be 
confirmed closer to the date. Lor information contact 
Caroline Grant via email on chhgrant@yahoo.com 

Historic Gardens of Perth exhibition 
opening 

West Australia 
Friday 13 

Historic Gardens of Perth exhibition opening at 
Perth Town Hall. Other details to be confirmed. 

Lor information contact Caroline Grant via email on 
chhgrant@yahoo.com 

Birchgrove walk 

Sydney and Northern NSW 
Saturday 21 

Discover Mort Park and Ballast Point Park (both 
former industrial sites, now two contrasting modern 
harbour-side parks), and a couple of enchanting private 
gardens in very diverse locations. 2— 5pm, meeting 
place advised on booking. Cost: $15 members, $25 
non-members. Bookings essential. Lor bookings and 
enquiries contact Jeanne Villani on (02) 9997 5995 or 
jeanne@villani.com 

JUNE 201 1 

Hawkesbury disappearing agriculture 
day 

Sydney and Northern NSW 
Sunday 19 

Discover UWS Richmond Campus’s Secret Garden and 
Lederation era grounds on this self-drive afternoon tour 
of Hawkesbury Harvest (farm gate) and Hawkesbury 
Artists’ trails. 10.30— 5pm, meeting place to be advised 
on booking. Cost: to be advised. Bookings essential. 

Lor bookings and enquiries contact Jeanne Villani on 
(02) 9997 5995 orjeanne@villani.com 

Winter lecture 

Victoria 
Sunday 19 

Diana Snape will talk on the history of the use of 
Australian native plants in garden design and by garden 
designers, many of whom are known to her, who 
have promoted the use of native plants in designed 
landscapes. 6pm for 6.30pm, Mueller Hall, The 
Herbarium, Birdwood Ave., South Yarra. Cost: $15 
members, $20 non-members, $5 students with student 
card. Enquiries to Pamela Jellie (03) 9836 1881 


34 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 












‘Understanding Place: the resource of 
landscape', Western Australian forum, 
Saturday, 12 March 2011 

Caroline Grant 


Longstanding member John Viska recalls that 
the Western Australian Branch of the Australian 
Garden History Society was formed over 20 years 
ago, around the time of Australia’s bicentennial 
celebrations, and when John Sales (gardens advisor 
to the English National Trust) toured Australia. To 
celebrate its twenty-first birthday, an exhibition of 
early gardens of Western Australia has been planned 
with sponsorship from the City of Perth and the 
AGHS National Management Committee. ‘Historic 
Gardens of Perth’ will run from 11—25 May 2011 at 
the Perth Town Hall. 

At the same time that the WA Branch was planning 
this exhibition, development pressure on Perth — 
resulting from the minerals boom — was building. 
New plans have created renewed concern about 
the Swan River foreshore and conservation of the 
historic plantings there. Our Society’s website states: 

Formed in igSo, the Australian Garden History 
Society brings together people united by an 
appreciation of and concern for our parks, gardens 
and cultural landscapes as part of Australia’s 


heritage. The Society promotes knowledge of 
historic gardens and research into their history. 

It aims to examine gardens and gardening in 
their widest social, historic, literary, artistic and 
scientific context. 

It could be argued that gardening in its widest sense 
involves the treatment of whole landscapes. Feelings 
about the broader landscape in Western Australia 
were piqued recently, for instance, when a coal mine 
was proposed for the Margaret River region. The 
mine would rely on road transport of coal through 
the vineyards to Bunbury for shipping, and many 
local people are concerned about the effect of the 
proposed mine on the water supply as well as the 
amenity of the area. If Western Australia had a 
sound landscape assessment system it is unlikely a 
coal mine would be proposed for a landscape with 
important scenic values, high economic values 
(in terms of the wine produced), and the tourism 
revenue that the area generates. The proposed mine 
lies within the town’s water catchment, with all the 
implications for surface water collection, interference 



These two views of Kings Park, Perth (above and overleaf), encapsulate both the beauty and management challenges of designed landscapes — if 
such well-known landscapes pose dilemmas for planners, how much more crucial are the myriad decisions about lesser-known places often 
made in the absence of any rigorous planning assessment. 


Australian Garden History V0I.22 N0.3 January/February/March 2011 


35 


Caroline Grant 



with aquifers, and subsidence, that a coal mine 
brings. Concerns about landscape protection have 
been voiced by the National Trust and other 
amenity groups in Western Australia including the 
Guildford Society. 

In September 2010 Heritage Victoria ran a 
landscape forum supported by representatives from 
the AGHS and Australia ICOMOS, and AGHS 
Chairman John Dwyer has subsequently offered 
national support to hold such an event in Western 
Australia. The National Trust of WA has offered 
support while Juliet Ramsay, chair of the National 
Scientific Committee of Cultural Landscapes and 
Cultural Routes committee of Australia ICOMOS, 
also offered her services. 

The landscape forum, ‘Understanding Place: the 
resource of landscape’, to be held in Perth on 
Saturday, 12 March 2011, will be opened by the 
Vice-Chancellor of Western Australia and eminent 
agricultural scientist Professor Alan Robson. The 
forum’s objective is to create a multi-disciplinary 
setting in which the concept of landscape can be 
discussed, and issues relating to Western Australia’s 
landscapes aired. A range of presenters and 
audience participants with experience in considering 
landscapes in a broad sense will be invited, to 


help draw together a common set of values and 
meanings. As the population of the state grows 
and concentrates in the south west, and as housing 
subdivisions and infrastructure infiltrate agricultural 
areas, state planning initiatives and private 
property rights are increasingly likely to conflict. 
From a democratic point of view, it is important to 
share information and perspectives to inform the 
landscape management process. 

Simon Lang and Marion Blackwell will inform 
the audience about the natural history of Western 
Australia; its geology, soils, and its special flora. Craig 
Burton, Stuart Read, Juliet Ramsay, and Richard 
Aitken will explore case studies and ideas elsewhere 
in Australia which have dealt with natural history. 
Aboriginal occupation, layers of European history, 
heritage significance, and the political aspects of these 
cases (including World Heritage listing). We will also 
hear from Stephanie Clegg, Tara Cherrie, and Ruth 
Morgan discussing local issues. 

Apart from AGHS members and National Trust 
members, it is hoped to draw an audience from 
local government and the general public, including 
farmers, land developers, and concerned individuals. 
Updated information will be posted on the AGHS 
website regularly. 



AUSTRALIAN 


GARDEN 

HISTORY 


Mission Statement 

The Australian Garden History Society is the leader in concern for and conservation of significant cultural 
landscapes and historic gardens through committed, relevant and sustainable action. 


Phone: 03 9650 5043 ■ ToIIfree: 1800 678 446 ■ www.gardenhistorysociety.org.au